Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 5.10 "Breezy Badger" Released

An anonymous reader writes "Ubuntu 5.10 "Breezy Badger" has been released! Direct links for the US install iso or the US install torrent file." Update: 10/13 18:08 GMT by Z : Linux.com has a look at the release, in-depth.

417 comments

  1. released ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... or leaked?

    1. Re:released ... by ggvaidya · · Score: 4, Funny

      And it's not just the OS itself ... I've heard from certain "sources" that the source code for the entire operating system can be downloaded from them evil BitTorrent programs!

      Honest monopolists everywhere are cringing in their sleep ... somebody turn on the **AA-signal, quick!

    2. Re:released ... by paulwallen · · Score: 0

      Same thing:)

      'Leaked' for proprietary, 'Released' for Open Sourse.

    3. Re:released ... by TetryonX · · Score: 1

      Leaked implies unintentional. This by all means is intentional.

      Microsoft, whether or not they are releasing or leaking snapshots of Vista out, cannot say that they have released a copy of Vista out. That would imply that they would have to support the current operating system right now, even though it is in the development stage. If a business got ahold of a released version of Vista, and somehow were licencedly-entitled to do so, if they had a problem, microsoft would HAVE TO fix the problem, if that is part of their current support contract. However, since Microsoft has called it a leak, or at least will do so, businesses or other people who have support contracts with microsoft may receive support for the product until the product is actually released, but they are under no obligation to do so.

      --
      [!] No, I can't see my comments. They are not worthy of +3 moderation.
    4. Re:released ... by TetryonX · · Score: 1

      Eh... I probably should have mentioned that the second part of the message was to address all flamers who will be like "zomg like m$ r3le4sed/l3aked v1sta".

      Just attempting to prevent further leakage of the Vista topic into this one.

      --
      [!] No, I can't see my comments. They are not worthy of +3 moderation.
    5. Re:released ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No offense, but clearly, you are lacking in that ever important sixth sense.

      You know, the humor one.

    6. Re:released ... by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      Escaped.

    7. Re:released ... by laklare · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you need help.

    8. Re:released ... by laklare · · Score: 1

      That's hilarious!

    9. Re:released ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does "Breezy Badger" sound as stupid in African languages as it does in English?
      Dumb/cutesy names are among the barriers to LOTD, and "Breezy Badger" is worthy of a punch to the throat.

    10. Re:released ... by TetryonX · · Score: 1

      I know it was a joke, but it was an incredibly stupid joke.
      This 6th sense of yours must be broke. Joking or not, the parent to the post I made originally was stupid and should have been withheld.

      --
      [!] No, I can't see my comments. They are not worthy of +3 moderation.
    11. Re:released ... by alc6379 · · Score: 1

      Lemme just jump in with a "Me too" on this one. The only thing that kept me from installing the last release is that I thought "Hoary Hedgehog" sounded like a rodent with loose morals.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    12. Re:released ... by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1

      That's the reason I haven't tried it out yet, the IMO, awful names.

  2. Why do we love Ubuntu by Your+Anus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK. I give. What is so amazing about Ubuntu? Do they compile thier stuff with special options or have some whiz-bang installation program?

    --

    In the USA, we like stuff watered down, like beer, television, and freedom.
    1. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by shadowknot · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nothing really special about it when compared to Debian except that it seems to form a more focused and complete desktop installation. I must admit though, whenever I have installed it it's been perfect for use as a desktop machine for just browsing the web/checking email etc. Wouldn't install it for development though. On the subject of the install it's just a (very very) slightly streamlined version of the stock Debian NCURSES installer.

    2. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by bmsleight · · Score: 1
      It just works. I've installed Breezy and of all ther Operating Systems I have ever installed it wins by a mile.

      Problems: None

      Boring when things just work.

    3. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Enahs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Neither. The amazing thing about Ubuntu is that stuff just works, usually with little to no wankery.

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
    4. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ubuntu is Linux for Human Beings, not Linux That Uses Very Optimized Compile Options For That Extra 0.1% Performance.

      It does the big things (technical stuff) right, and the "small" things (smoothness of UI, user experience out-of-the-box) right. It has Ubuntu Manifesto that emphasizes the "human touch" and general friendliness towards others (also "small" things).

    5. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by cloudmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It should be noted that "stuff" includes a nice, functional desktop with programs and associations and sound and a whole bunch of "just use it" kind of feel. On most hardware, it's really impressive how well it manages to just make everything work - especially when one's used to "the old days" (I first installed Slackware circa 1995 - things like X and sound didn't really "just work"). Even today, though, it does a better job of post-install stuff working on more machines than Windows, IMHO.

    6. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the front page - "Ubuntu" is an ancient African word, meaning "humanity to others". Ubuntu also means "I am what I am because of who we all are". The Ubuntu Linux distribution brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the software world.

      So if this is like the "we" as in slashdot crowd, it will yell at you every time you enter a command based on a presumption most of the time. It will also disregard and kill -9 commands that it feels are not in line with it's own agenda with the 'moddown' process. Also, if you run a query it will give you about 100 pages of data that may contain about 2 entries relevant to your | grep.

      Maybe they should rethink this statement....

    7. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Marc+D.M. · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you've used Debian, you'll understand why we like apt-get and synaptic. If you haven't, I say try it out for a week, and see if you go back.

      I originally arrived at the Ubuntu party back when "Warty Warthog" was the tune everyone danced to. I stepped in fresh from the Suse 9.0 party after being thrown out by bad Gnome support.

      When I arrived (after installing WW on a 3rd partition), I was greeted by a desktop that had all the gnome/mac-ish looking fonts and everything seemed to be just SIMPLE. No need to wade through 2000 menus to figure what is already installed. And no more YAST.

      Configuring the Synaptic thingy was easier this time than any previous experiences getting yast or yum/rpm to download packages and their dependencies. The closest I got to that on Suse was red-carpet/rug.

      Ignoring all the hype (as hard as it is), I use Ubuntu because it works (like everyone else says).

      I currently use Ubuntu "Hoary" as my main OS in daily work. I've been using it since the day it released. To upgrade I opened synaptic, changed the repository distribution labels from warty to hoary, hit save, hit the reload button, then click "mark all upgrades". After applying the selection, I switched workspace and went back to what I was doing before.

    8. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by emj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would say that ubuntu is perfect for developing, it leaves all the stupid configuring to the people who spend their life doing it and let us ordinary programmers not care about things those insignifaicant things. Since it commesout so often it's very seldom that you don't have an development library that you need, it somehow always seems to make it into the next version at just exatcly the right time.

      Now Ubunutu isn't very good on installing games, if you want to do that go with Gentoo which IMHO actally has the best installation procedures for commercial games (demos).

    9. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by elebrin · · Score: 5, Informative

      - Ubuntu is nice due it's quick install.
        - Features also tend to work immidately: I spent three months trying to get a TV tuner working in various Redhat/Fedora Core releases and it never worked properly.
        - The ubuntuguide is another great plus: it is possible to know very little about setting up a linux box, and get Ubuntu doing what you want it to quickly.
        - Debian package management (no more difficult then gentoo package management, without having to wait for it to compile)
        - 1 install CD instead of 3 to 6
        - A great community that makes this a distro one that anyone can eisily download, install, and set up; it is ideal for people who want to migrate, or even for more experenced people who don't want to spend 65% of their time maintaining the computer and the rest actually using it for work or play or whatever.

      Now, if they had mplayer packaged such that it installed, and played DVDs correctly without as much effort (i.e. getting the source from the developers and manually compiling it, not that this is difficult, but it should be unneccessary), I would be happier.

      --
      Think for yourself. Question Authority.
    10. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by WinDOOR · · Score: 1

      I've been using Suse because it's the only distro I've had any luck with. I'm a windows guy trying to learn Linux but have some sort of ADD that keeps me from succussecfully making my way through a linux manual. (self diagnosis) I went to distrowatch on a whim last night (never been there) and saw the link to ubuntu. I said lets give it a shot and downloaded it. Fired up the test box and threw the disk in. What do you know, it just installed with little fanfare and only one disk, kind of like a standard xp/2000 install. Simple options to configure. It just worked on a shuttle box that both Suse and Fedora had problems installing on. The default installation is perfect for your casual user.
      I've heard the Debian guys talking about apt, but have never had luck getting a Debian install going. (my fault not Debian) But the apt interface works so much better than rpm. (which I had no luck with also) I downloaded and installed Thunderbird via Apt and it loaded right up. I had to restart the computer get it to show on the menu though. I think I've found my distro to learn on.

    11. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't install it for development though.

      Why not?

    12. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by NicolaiBSD · · Score: 2, Funny

      The naked people artwork, obviously!

    13. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by zxnos · · Score: 1
      It just works.

      the last release didnt 'just work' on my notebook. keyboard doesnt always work, -it was funny, i typed my username durig setup then i couldnt type the password!- no wifi, oftentimes compressed files are reported as being empty, system slows the longer it is up. perhaps it is becuase i am using the x64 version. anyway, going to give this new release a shot.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    14. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit of a Gentoo zealot (mostly because I run servers on older hardware (read:400-600mhz G3s, G4s, PentiumIII)), and I love Gentoo's package manager.

      I kept hearing about this ubuntu thing and my curiosity was finally sparked when I couldn't get Gentoo to boot on this old-ass PCG-505tx Vaio laptop I found in the trash. Mandrake and Debian wouldn't boot, either, so I tried out Ubuntu. Ubunto's install disk booted without a hitch, but the LiveCD just hung (even when I disabled APIC).

      the install was pretty damned good. It had several options. Server or linux, and standard or advanced installs for each. I tried the advanced, but some of the options were a little over my head (especially since I have no clue about the ins and outs of this stupid vaio).

      Once installed, everything worked great. 64mb of RAM and a slow HD don't really help the gnome performance (I've never used gnome before... I'm a KDE cat, myself... or more frequently, blackbox.), and it's a little slow to do even the simplest things. xorg was misconfigured at first, though. I had to fiddle with the xorg.conf to get it to use the right resolution.

      The only problem is that I can't get my PCMCIA ethernet card to work. It loads the modules and mii-tool communicates with it. ifconfig sets up, but the system isn't receiving packets. since I can't get online, or even on the network, I can't comment on ubuntu's package manager, but I believe it uses dpkg.

      another cool thing is that I plugged in a USB thumb drive which has my ssh private key on it and some other misc crap, and ubuntu saw it and mounted it without a hitch. pretty damn impressive.

      I generally don't use linux on the desktop unless I'm doing serious development, but if I did, I think I'd use ubuntu.

      wow, that totally sounds like a testimonial advert. sheesh.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    15. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by SnowDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People are much better off with ubuntu for transgaming IMHO. Things just work. That's nice. I futzed around with Gentoo on the desktop for months and even have it on a server. I wont be doing that again. It's always nice when you emerge -u system and networking completely breaks on a production server :/ Of course it was fixed in 10 minutes, but still very uncool.

      Gentoo *can* offer much better performance, however, most people that install Gentoo will never get a system more optimized or even as optimized as the default Ubuntu install will - or, if they do, they spent *huge* amounts of time trying to get things to work. Gentoo was a fun learning experience, but it is not a serious desktop or server distro.

    16. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by jc42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It just works.

      Not here. I have a several-years-old Dell box with an old RH installed, wasn't using it for much, so I decided to try Ubuntu. It seemed to be installing ok (though it's hard to spot error messages when they scroll off the top too fast to read). But when it settled down, all I got was a brownish-green screen with a typical pointer arrowhead in the center. That's all. It doesn't respond to anything on the keyboard, and the mouse doesn't move the arrow.

      This is with the "live" CD. I also tried the "install" CD. This did demo that the keyboard and mouse work with Ubuntu, as I could use both of them during the prelim parts of the install. I got as far as the part about partitioning the disk, and can't get past that. It insists that I partition the disk, but nothing it shows me makes any sense. No info about the disk that it wants partitioned, and no matter what I select, it just leads back to that first screen about disk partitioning. After a few times around each path back to that screen, I gave up.

      I suspect that they could use some filling out in their online troubleshooting stuff. I don't seem to find anything saying what to do when it behaves the way I see.

      One thing curious is its remark that it won't repartition if there's already a linux installed. There is one installed, the old RH system. But it keeps insisting that I do some sort of partitioning, and won't advance past that point, not even if I tell it to accept the partitions. That just bounces me back to the first page about partitioning.

      Anyone have a pointer to clues about installing it over an existing linux installation? Any way to say "wipe the disk and start from scratch"?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    17. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Aim+Here · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The major innovation of Ubuntu is that it has pictures of bright-eyed bushy-tailed cute young things holding hands and smiling at the camera on the homepage, after a few refreshing glasses of kool-aid, no doubt. Most Linux-based companies are very reticent about putting pictures of their userbase on the advertising propaganda, for very good reasons

      The Ubuntu folks seem to have have a similar corporate attitude to that Reiser dude or perhaps the MySQL people in their more touchy-feely moments, which may appeal to you, if you're the type of person who falls for bland and meaningless corporate platitudes written on glossy corporate brochures. Each to their own, I suppose

      Otherwise, it's just a friendly debian-based distro...

    18. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Mjlner · · Score: 3, Informative
      "OK. I give. What is so amazing about Ubuntu? Do they compile thier stuff with special options or have some whiz-bang installation program?"

      It seems to me that you're not familiar with Debian. (?) Debian is a Linux distro which has often been praised for having very good software package tools, ie. tools you use to install software packages. Debian's APT was the first really good package tool, which is nowadays mimicked by eg. Fedora's Yum, but APT is still very popular and holds it's own against the alternatives. (APT is also available for Fedora, which IMO proves it's worth and popularity.)

      The long standing problem with Debian, however, has been a very slow release cycle for the stable branch, meaning that if you want to use the newest and coolest software, you need to use the testing or the unstable branch. Many users are reluctant to use these branches, because you can easily break your system by installing software versions that do not mix together well. Eg. installing a new version of a library (DLL) might break several software packages dependant on an earlier version of that library.

      Ubuntu leverages all the benefits of APT, but eliminates the problem with long release cycles by having two releases per year, enabling you to use the newest and hottest versions of all your favourite software. You don't need to wait for a new version to come out for longer than six months. This only in the rare case that the new version is released just after the latest Ubuntu release.

      Upgrading to the newest version of Ubuntu is also quite easy. You edit a config file to refer to the newest release, issue the commands apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade and Bob's your uncle! Editing a config file might not be everybody's cup of tea, but I think there might bee GUI tools for this. I don't know, because I have no problems with config files.

      --
      Lemon curry???
    19. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try using the x86-64/AMD64/EM64T version. I have no such issues here. Anyway, I didn't know there was a port to this weird x64 thing ;-)

    20. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by CoderBob · · Score: 2

      Don't you mean on their homepage?

    21. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I dunno - I use Ubuntu for testing my installer for Oolite-Linux, and it seems pretty trouble free with both the Autopackage installer and home-rolled tarball installer. I don't see anything unusual about Ubuntu that would result in significant breakage.

    22. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Aim+Here · · Score: 1

      Gah, I do indeed. Thanks for that.

    23. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by qkslvrwolf · · Score: 1

      sweet! its not just me! thank god! I'm having to reinstall because I can't log in to the bloody box..my keyboard won't work at all! Does it really work to use the em64? Can I install that from some kind of safe mode?

      --
      Or have you only comfort...that stealthy thing that enters the house and guest then becomes host, then master - KG
    24. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by steevc · · Score: 0

      Until about 4 months ago I was playing with Knoppix and haviong a few issues with things like sound. I then tried Hoary (5.04) and things got better. I still needed to tweak some files to get it all working.

      Application install has been very easy. Everything I wanted just works, apart from Wine, but I may have been expecting too much of it. Some hardware is unsupported (webcam totally, printer partially), but I don't think any other distro does better on those.

      I'll be upgrading to Breezy in the next week.

    25. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by arkanes · · Score: 1

      I prefer Ubuntu, but when I used Fedora, I couldn't live without apt4rpm. It really smoothes out the difference between apt/rpm. One advantage was that much software (thats not in repositories) is packaged for Fedora, but .debs for Ubuntu are much rarer. So you kinda get the best of both worlds there.

    26. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by noahm · · Score: 4, Informative
      OK. I give. What is so amazing about Ubuntu? Do they compile thier stuff with special options or have some whiz-bang installation program?

      The thing I love about Ubuntu (actually Kubuntu; I much prefer KDE) is that it takes this great framework provided by Debian and actually uses it. That is, for example, when you plug in a USB storage device, you don't worry about where it's going to show up in /dev or where to mount it or what groups you need to be in in order to access it. It Just Works, with the file manager opening up a window on you desktop showing the contents of the drive. Debian has all the necessary bits to do things like this, too, but none if it Just Works by default.

      It's just a really really well integrated system that works well. Somebody (Tim O'Reilley?) said that MacOS X made computing fun again. To me, (K)Ubuntu makes computing fun again.

      noah

    27. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Waltre · · Score: 2, Informative

      " Any way to say "wipe the disk and start from scratch"?"

      I believe it gives you an option: Erase entire disk (hda...info), or manually edit partition table.

      You want the first option.

      See this osdir screenshot

      These fancy RH installs have messed with your mind :).

    28. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      I haven't updated it yet (got some stuff running ATM under Fedora I wanna get finished first), but Ubuntu's one of the 4 distros on this machine (Yoper, FC4 & RH9 are the others). And I totally agree, apt and Synaptic are GREAT. I use apt for 99% of my FC4 updates, though I haven't tried to do a dist-update with it (too much weirdness on that partition). I'll schedule a cron job tonite to do the update when nobody else is on the LAN. (grin)

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    29. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I first installed Slackware circa 1995 - things like X and sound didn't really "just work"

      I most recently installed slackware three months ago, and things like X and sound still don't "just work." But that's Slack - it's for people who know how they need to set up their box, and *really* don't want their Linux distro getting in the way of them doing that. Yeah, I'm lookin' at you, Red Hat.

    30. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by dcroxton · · Score: 1

      You got a t.v. tuner working in Ubuntu? How? I recently got a PVR-250, and I had to go through about a dozen steps to download and install the ivtv module and the firmware, and mine still doesn't work. I'm hoping this latest release might actually include ivtv by default...

      --
      Sincerely, Derek

      A curious little blog
    31. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by xtracto · · Score: 1, Troll

      Nothing really special about it when compared to Debian

      Uhhhh, is this true for Debian?

      And ?

      Hehe, I loved the Mandriva (former Mandrake ) one

      Or what about Red Hat?

      Or for Linuxp-anti-SCO zealots: Caldera

      You can see others at nanocrew

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    32. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by nazsco · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better marketing then those distros for filty hippies

    33. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      I was a KDE convert (and probably still am), but I gave Ubuntu a spin after I was annoyed by Fedora 3 + amarok (probably not fedora's fault). Anyway, after some fidling with my sound cards (I have an extra audigy 2 card) it works, even wine - double clicking in nautilus of a windows .exe starts the app corectly, after I manually told it to open exes with wine.
      Anyway, Ubuntu got me to replace my daily windows desktop with the gnome desktop and become, in the process, a (sometimes unhappy) gnome user. I have kde installed, but 3.4.2 has some bugs related to the way the panels work, and I felt in love with the way gnome's desktop resembles macos.
      Some things that I don't appreciate about gnome and wish that they could take some cues from kde: the gnome start menu "swallows" applications, meaning I only get to see 1/4 of all the menu entries I have in KDE, network transparency is not working well (not all the apps are integrated with it), and after I've added some network "places", I get asked by keyring all the time about the password, because it wants to connect to those places, even when I open a file open dialog. I've done the same thing with KDE and I get a smarter behaviour.
      And one more thing :) xcomgmgr is really nice. Too bad that it's kind of buggy (it crashes on different ocasions) and I can't get the movies to work with it (although I didn't really try).

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    34. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by robbkidd · · Score: 1
      What is so amazing about Ubuntu?
      It is Debian, in many peoples' opinion an amazing distribution on its own, with a bit more desktop polish.
    35. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Assuming the Ubuntu installer is anything like the Debian one, this is what you do:

      Wait for the installer to ask you a question, but do not answer it. Switch to another screen {ctrl + alt + f2}. Hit return a few times until you get a shell prompt.

      You can now run fdisk {unfortunately, it'll be like the Slackware one and not the old Debian one}, nuke the original partitions, and reboot the installer with a clean HDD.

      If you find that fdisk shows no disks, you have a problem; you will have to find a distro that does boot on that system, work out what driver is required for the HDD, and compile just that one module against the same kernel as the one on the install CD. Save it to a USB storage device {a digital camera is as good as anything} and just make sure that it's plugged into the target computer next time you boot up.

      If, on startup, you get LI and no more, you can also use your Debian or Ubuntu disk. Same procedure, but do fdisk -l to see what partitions are there. Do mkdir /recovery and mount whatever you think is likely to be the root partition on /recovery {nb, it's using devfs, so your paths will be like /dev/scsi/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 as opposed to /dev/sda1}. Next, cat /recovery/etc/fstab and mount anything else necessary under /recovery. Finally chroot /recovery -- and you are now running the kernel off the CD with the userland on your old system. Run /sbin/lilo, let it do its bit about adding images. Press ctrl + D to exit the chroot {this is important}, then type poweroff to shut the system down.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    36. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by orasio · · Score: 1

      Hm..........
      X and sound are hardware issues. It depends strongly on the way you buy hardware.
      My personal experience is that the three SuSE desktops I had at work didn't get correctly configured by Sax2, and I needed to manually edit the XF86Config . On Slackware, I had to run xorgcfg, and when I bought the NVidia card, run its installer, but at least I didn't have to edit the xorg.conf file myself. Not that I fear that file, but I just wanted to show that YMMV when talking about hardware support.
      About sound, I had the same experience. Maybe it's SuSE that has too bad hardware support, but I was surprised by Slackware 9.1 hardware support. My webcam was plug-and-play. The very old TV capture card, too. Well, I needed to install xawtv. But with hardware, I was pleasantly suprised.

    37. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by OneSeventeen · · Score: 1

      After trying gentoo, slackware, debian, mandrake/mandriva, and suse, I finally tried out Ubuntu. While most of my systems dual booted windows and linux, my new laptop boots only Ubuntu, because it has all the features of debian, but a friendly user community and a desktop/marketing strategy geared towards the end user. (that's me... not a kernel hacker, not a C developer fluent in perl, an end user trying to check his mail)

      And along the same lines of other users, things just work (for the most part).

      I am downloading 5.10 now, but I'm running 5.04 on my wide-screen laptop with fully functioning wireless networking, sound, touchpad, and 1280x800 screen resolution. (Wireless involved installing a proprietary driver, but that was freely available from the manufacturer's website.) Another interesting note is that under 64-bit windows XP I could never get sound to work, even after trying various 64-bit drivers from the manufacturer. Yet 64-bit Ubuntu was able to use the sound card right out of the box!

      I would also like to mention that for $100 I can submit up to 10 incedents within a year and have them solve the issue for me. I have never had to use the support, but they do offer it, and much cheaper than what our existing operating systems at my work charge. (we pay around $150 per issue on our windows network)

      Plus, isn't that a cool and simple logo?

      --
      "Now the trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed." -C.S. Lewis
    38. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by KrisW · · Score: 1

      I guess we know which distro the people who modded you down use...

      --


      "Think you can take me? Go ahead on. It's your move." --Joe Don Baker in Final Justice
    39. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by saskboy · · Score: 1

      " It just works. "

      It didn't for me, at least the 5.06 version didn't I mean. I have an ATI card though, and I've had bad luck installing most other linux systems, so maybe it's my computer, and not the suckines of the OS install routine. Most linux distros hang upon an installation attempt on my AMD 1800+ with an ATI 8500DV Radeon AIW.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    40. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Orgazmus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I run a couple of low cost webservers on gentoo, and its really nice when you get it right. Steep learning curve tho.
      I also use it on my primary desktop and on my work-laptop, and it is a joy compared to many other distros. But im leaning towards trying ubuntu on my laptop now. If gentoo didnt take so much time to get right, it would be easier to just try it.
      If you are willing to spend some extra time working with your system instead of using all your time working on it, gentoo is really nice.
      If you want a good, stable and featureful linuxdesktop RIGHT NOW!!(+!!x10^25), ubuntu is a fine choice.

      Everyone have their preferences, but blowing off gentoo as a unusable desktop distro because you did not like it is a bit rude. There are many people who use it that way, and we like it :)

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    41. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Certain packages can only be distributed in source code form for licencing reasons; mplayer is one of them {LAME and PINE also spring to mind}. Though it should be possible to build a deb file so as to include dependencies for the compilation environment itself and everything that mplayer depends upon {so the compilation is certain to proceed cleanly}; put the source code somewhere sane; and perform the actual compilation step from within the post-install script.

      This would finally make compiling from source as easy as installing a binary package.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    42. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by xtracto · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hahaha mods, what are you smoking?? my comment was meant to be FUN. Insightful?

      I think the Metamoderation should allow to mod moderations as FUN lol

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    43. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      The long standing problem with Debian, however, has been a very slow release cycle for the stable branch...

      Actually, it's not a problem, it's a feature. Try running thousands (even hundreds!) of debian servers and having to upgrade every 6 months. Bah! I think not. Every three years, with security updates in between is actually a godsend. Hope the different perspective gives you some insight...

    44. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to restart the computer get it to show on the menu though.

      You can restart x without rebooting by hitting ctrl+alt+backspace.

    45. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I just upgraded a slack box a few weeks ago (though the initial install was actually done 449 days ago, according to uptime). With new Slack (or, more specifically, new X) there are nice tools that can do the configuration for you. Try running "X -configure" sometime - that's much easier in most cases than building an xf86config by hand (or running xf86config, which was essentially the same thing). PCI-based sound cards are popular and relatively easy to configure now - there's no digging around for what interrupt your ISA card is using, and then trying to figure out where exactly the parameters for the module are located. So, while there's still setup required for Slack which is easier than before - it's still impressive to me that Ubuntu (and similar) do all of that "magically".

      Never mind what a pain it was to download Slack on about seven million floppy disks... :)

    46. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Ashish+Kulkarni · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Check out Automatix (Automated GUI installation script) posted on the EasyUbuntu forum. It installs all the nice-to-have extra software automatically. It's been updated to this release, and the number of posts has increased dramatically since I downloaded it this morning!! A list of what it does (copied from the post): Capabilities: 1) Installs multimedia codecs 2) Installs all Firefox plugins (java, flash, etc) (except Adobe reader and mplayer) 3) Modifies ALSA, OSS and ESD confs for duplex sound (solves most audio related probs on Ubuntu) 4) Adds midi capability to your Ubuntu box (NEW) 5) Installs RAR and ACE archive support 6) Installs skype 7) Installs Acrobat reader 7 and firefox plugin for the same. 8) Installs Gnomebaker (CD/DVD burning s/w for GNOME) 9) Installs gftp (FTP client for GNOME with ssh capability) 10) Configures Ctrl-Alt-Del to start up Gnome System Monitor (aka Windows) 11) Disables powernowd on laptops when they are plugged in 12) Installs DC++ and Limewire (file sharing progs) 13) Installs multimedia editors (Audacity (audio), Kino (video), EasyTag (ID3)) 14) Installs CD (goobox) and DVD (dvdrip) rippers 15) Installs Mplayer and mplayerplug-in version 3.05 for Firefox 16) Installs totem-xine, VLC and Beep Media Player (with docklet) 17) Installs Opera Browser 18) Installs Debian Menu (shows all installed applications) 19) Installs Bittornado and Azureus (Bittorrent clients) 20) Installs Avidemux 21) Enables Prelinking 22) Enables Numlock on (turns numlock on Gnome startup) 23) Installs Programming Tools (Anjuta (C/C++ IDE), Bluefish (HTML editor) and Screem (Web Development Env.)) 24) Gamepads (Makes USB gamepads work) 25) Totem and Mozplugger (Totem embedded with mozplugger) 26) GnomePPP (Graphical Dial up connection tool) (NEW)

    47. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Catskul · · Score: 1
      Dude, I think you have a backwards view of features.

      What you said is like saying:
      "Microsoft not patching security holes is a feature not a bug. See, it would be really expensive for them to provide timely patches"


      You are really s-m-r-t.
      --

      Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    48. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      X and sound are hardware issues. It depends strongly on the way you buy hardware.

      Not in this case. Knoppix autodetected my hardware; Slackware didn't try. Do I care? Not much. I set it up myeslf, recompiled the kernel, edited the xorg.conf, and away we go.

      I should have been more specific. Linux supports the hardware (between the kernel for sound and xorg.conf for X). Slackware doesn't spend effort bothering to autodetect them. It assumes you can do that yourself. I'm mostly OK with that assessment.

    49. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Try running "X -configure" sometime - that's much easier in most cases than building an xf86config by hand (or running xf86config, which was essentially the same thing).

      Cool, I'll try that. For some reason, I've always had luck with XF86Config, so I've never bothered looking for other ways. I presume this is an xorg thing? Those guys kick ass.

      Never mind what a pain it was to download Slack on about seven million floppy disks... :)

      Do I even want to ask why you did that? :)

    50. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Huh? Where you been? All moderators at /. see everything as "Insightful", much like a robot replaying monkey_sniff_finger.mpg at databank cell 0xFFFF0E12. They actually had to _hire_ one guy specifically for the "Funny" moderations here, a consultant so to speak. He's just on the shitter right now reading the funny pages...

    51. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Informative

      Difference being that with Debian Stable, they backport the security fixes. You are guaranteed that a security fix touches nothing else. And you are more or less guaranteed that it won't break anything.
      The same can't be said about MS service packs

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    52. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by rebelcan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the part of the problem with Linux. If you have to go through all that just to get Linux to install, how is "the average computer user" ( ie, your grandma ) going to be able to install Linux?

      I'm not saying that Microsoft is a better choice ( use Linux at home, Debian/unstable ), but Linux still has a few things that need to be fixed before it's truly desktop-ready.

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    53. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Catskul · · Score: 1

      I think I had missed the grandparents point... I thought he was saying it was hard to keep the Debian mirrors up to date when they keep releasing.

      --

      Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    54. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by JayAEU · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother! Debian's "slow" release cycle is actually what makes it so smooth, because this way there is no need to rush things out the door just because some marketing schedule says so.

      I honestly hope that they stick to what they've been doing so far: Release an updated distro when it is ready!

      In addition, I'm also very happy about the fact that I don't have to upgrade our servers twice a year. Running apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade is all I need to do once a week to stay on the updated side of things.

    55. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Digz · · Score: 1

      Umm... We were too poor to buy CD-ROMs back then? :)

      --
      SYS 64738
    56. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your answer to why debian is good is apt?

      and that ubuntu having apt too, plus more current packages is why it's great?

      well hell you just described a bazillion other distros that have more current packages and you guess it, apt too.

      perhaps you should try again.

    57. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      - 1 install CD instead of 3 to 6

      Except that my Ubuntu box is at home and can get dial-up *if* I run a telephone extension cord halfway through the house, whereas at work I have highspeed connection and can burn CDs.

      How do I get the extra packages which are not included on the single install CD? I can download the .deb's, and simply transfer them, but I'd need to laboriously look up all of the dependencies to make sure I had all the required packages.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    58. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, those botnets must be a lot easier manage once you've cracked those systems using the "The Debian Way"

      in all seriousness, i'd like to see some verifiable documentation of any human that singlehandedly manages thousands or hundreds of debian servers.

      i think you're lying.

    59. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by nutshell42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is there finally a way to change your monitor settings without using a text editor? Every Ubuntu I've tried set my monitor to some safe settings which meant unusable 60Hz (WinXP OTOH auto-detects the correct settings, SuSE gives me a dialog where I can choose vendor and model).

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    60. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by SilvergunSuperman · · Score: 1

      I really think the only reason Windows is "ready to use out of the box" is that modern hardware is designed with Windows in mind. M$ forces the hardware manufacturers to do things "the Microsoft way" through market bullying tactics. In many ways, my ubuntu installation worked as well out of the box as any Windows XP installation ever has on my machine. And for the record, even m$ products don't work right out of the box for "the average computer user." I did microsoft tech support for a long time, and I can tell you that many "average users" (ie, shouldnt own a computer) are not happy with an OS installation process no matter how easy it is. For my money, Ubuntu does everything it should for a desktop system and gets most of it right.

    61. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC becouse I am moding this, To refreash the Gnome menu simply type killall gnome-panel in a terminal.

    62. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Umm, I think you're putting words in my (post) there. I never claimed to run them singlehandedly. Actually, I never claimed to run any at all! Debian, however, is about the only OS I would consider running single handedly after 100+. That + rdist, cfengine and maybe some other goodies. See you at LISA!

    63. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      It may just be an xorg thing, but I thought Xfree was doing it too. Either way, the xorg X server can basically configure itself, kindof like an extension of the X -probeonly thing from before. Run it as root and it spits out a nicely formatted xorg.conf in ~root/, with comments and everything. It's seriously cool.

      And as far as floppies - CD burners didn't exist at the time, and it was either that or get a Walnut Creek CD mirror. Of course, since I didn't know about the CDs and didn't have a CD drive in the machine anyway (but I *did* have a box of 100 pre-formattted floppies and a crasy awesome 56K dialup connetion)... You kids now and your good documentation + readily-available information, you know nothing of my trials. :) I actually built KDE beta 1 on that the P233 I had at the time. There's something that I'd call easy on Gentoo...

    64. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VLC is actually way better than mplayer for playing DVD's. VLC actually supports the menus and such. With mplayer you have to screw around manually selecting the right track and audio stream, subtitles, and all that kind of crap. VLC "just works".

      Don't get me wrong, I use mplayer for everything else, just not for playing DVD's.

    65. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Nope; I've never seen that screen. I do see a screen with
            [!!] Partition disks
      across the top. But it doesn't present me with the choise of erasing the disk. It only allows me to "Manually edit partition table" and "".

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    66. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by kabz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Installing Windows is a total pain in the ass. Especially trying to get drivers installed. Don't get me started on the antics I had to get a wireless card running in an old Duron machine with XP Pro. Literally, it wouldn't work until you got the driver to blue screen. Then you had to reboot and 'race' to switch off the driver before it could bluescreen, and let windows start managing the card.

      People use Windows because it COMES PRE-INSTALLED.

      If people had to install a retail version of Windows, then install net card drivers, scanner drivers etc., GNU/Linux would have a much better chance on the desktop.

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    67. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by kaens · · Score: 1

      If you had thousands of servers running Debian, and they were running it just fine, and Debian (theoretically) released every six months....why would you even bother upgrading them just because a new Debian came out? It's not like you would actually have to.

    68. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      Personally I had no problem, but I bought old refurbished hardware. Find yourself an old WinTV capture card, those are well supported. Just apt-get install tvtime, and away you go.

    69. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by pajama · · Score: 1

      APT should take care of dependencies. Read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptGetHowTo

      For example:
      apt-get install apache2

      Will install Apache 2 and ALL its dependencies.

      Or you could also try Synaptic:
      https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SynapticHowto

      If you want to avoid package downloading, you could try the DVD version:
      http://www.ubuntu.com/download/


      Ricardo Arguello

    70. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by saskboy · · Score: 1

      It works for me now I'm pleased to say. I don't know if I noticed it before, but there are boot options that involve typing:
      linux noapci nolapci or something like that, and then the install proceeded to work. I'm writing this comment now from Firefox in Ubuntu. Gaim is working as is my sound, network, and apparently my video card. I'm pretty pleased right now. It even offered to update to the latest security patches as soon as I started, and installed without trouble.

      Now I just have to configure the bootloader to load Windows by default, and I'm back in business.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    71. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      That's the part of the problem with Linux. If you have to go through all that just to get Linux to install, how is "the average computer user" ( ie, your grandma ) going to be able to install Linux?
      Try this experiment. Get a complete n00b to install Linux on one PC and Windows on another. See which one they thought was easier. Get another complete n00b to do the same test the other way around, just to make sure it's nothing to do with the order in which the tasks were attempted.

      If they both think Windows was easier, I will be very surprised.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    72. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      Quick install? Errr, no. It took me half an hour to do a one-cd install of Ubuntu, the exact same time I did a dvd install of Mandriva 2006. And Mandriva installed a shitload more software. I like Ubuntu but it's not really "fast to install".

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    73. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by anethema · · Score: 1

      The new screen resolution tool works flawlessly and is i'd say easier to use than windows xp's screen adjustment tools.

      Just pick your res and refresh, hit ok. Done.

      In hoary i just got some not supporting RandR error..but breezy works fantastic.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    74. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      You've missed the point: my Ubuntu box is not on line. I need to download all of the required packages, burn them to CD or write them to memory stick, and sneakernet them to my home computer.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    75. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by stunami · · Score: 0

      Burn the packages to your CD. Burn the CD and go home. Then on your home Ubuntu machine, in Synaptic goto Edit -> Add CDROM That should add the packages so you can install them easily via Synaptic. HTH

    76. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by AigariusDebian · · Score: 1

      apt-cache is the answer.

    77. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      Let me clarify what I said. I'm not saying that the Windows install will be easier for EVERYONE. With some of the newer distrobutions of Linux, installing Linux might be easier for a n00b. I guess it depends on the person.

      Part of the problem is yes, Windows comes by default on most machines that people buy right now, and yes, there is still a lot of hardware that is Windows-oriented.

      But if a user has to go to a command line at ANY point in an install of Linux, something isn't right. Yes, there are drivers for Windows that will be a bitch and a pain to install. But you can still get a mostly working Windows install without them. You might not have internet access, or only have a 640x480 resolution on your monitor, but at least you have a working computer. Don't get me wrong, if someone has trouble with any part of a Linux install, I'll gladly take over and fix it, just so they don't have to use Windows. But the fact that they need my help in the first place is the part that needs some work. The installer should be able to figure out all that fdisk stuff the grandparent was talking about and either hide it from the user and just do it, or ask the user what they want to do ( difference between 'quick' and 'custom' install? ).

      Just for example, I recently just ran 'apt-get upgrade' on my (debian) computer to update xorg and fluxbox. I have an NVidia card, so upgrading xorg overwrote the NVidia GLX driver. When I turned on my computer the next day, it couldn't start the X server. After a quick reinstall of the driver on the command line, I was back up and running. But to figure out what was wrong, I had to reboot the computer into single user mode, figure out what was wrong by going through the X server error log, and then reinstall the driver. How many average computer users are going to be able to figure that out when their "phancy graphical stuff" stops working? Keep in mind, I had to reboot because when the X server borked on me, it froze the keyboard ( couldn't even ctrl-alt-del my way out ).

      I love Linux. It just still needs some work, that's all.

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    78. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by overlordmead · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link...

      As a new user in the Linux world it took a while to compile the tools listed above, resolve the dependancies(little there was thanks to aptitude), all while remembering to "sudo" all my command-line stuff.

      A simple script like this could do alot for Ubuntu's out-of-the-cd functionability.

      I look forward to running it on the half-dozen fresh installs I've prescribed as cures for the common M$ product. //The Overlord

      --
      Think Gnole-ish, not prole-ish
    79. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      I just solved this problem. Applications -> System Tools -> Configuration Editor -> desktop -> gnome -> screen. You can take it from there.

      However I found it detected things fine for me. If you change monitors you will probably want to reboot, though.

      Jeremy

  3. Live cd ? USB/Flash stick version ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    would be nice

    1. Re:Live cd ? USB/Flash stick version ? by Swampy0007 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, if you insist on the livecds... Here is the x86 livecd or torrent. Here is the PowerPC livecd or torrent. Here is the AMD64 version and the torrent. Happy now?

  4. Thank GOD. by Enahs · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe in a month or two, people will stop bursting into #ubuntu and #kubuntu IRC channels asking "is Breezy released yet?" Now we can look forward to people bitching about the stability of, erm, whatever the new unstable version is. :-}

    --
    Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
    1. Re:Thank GOD. by TetryonX · · Score: 1

      That would be Dapper Drake.
      Too bad Ubuntu's servers are taking a beating right now. Update manager is crying in pain because half of the repositories I had listed aren't responding anymore.

      --
      [!] No, I can't see my comments. They are not worthy of +3 moderation.
    2. Re:Thank GOD. by mordors9 · · Score: 1

      I can't wait to see you on #ubuntu and ask if dapper drake has been released yet ;-)

    3. Re:Thank GOD. by Jessta · · Score: 1

      does anyone know if Dapper has been released?
      any idea of when it might be?

      --
      ...and that is all I have to say about that.
      http://jessta.id.au
    4. Re:Thank GOD. by xenocide2 · · Score: 1
      Too bad Ubuntu's servers are taking a beating right now. Update manager is crying in pain because half of the repositories I had listed aren't responding anymore.


      Which is why, combined with the inevitable release mistakes, I usually wait a week or two before upgrading. As nifty as open betas are, they arent likely to expose the same hardware and package combo problems as I use. But once it's "released" there almost has to be somebody using Ubuntu in a similar manner to myself. So I wait for all the Day 1 bugs to appear, and watch them get workarounds and fixes. Then I upgrade ;).
      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    5. Re:Thank GOD. by richardablitt · · Score: 1

      The developement version will be started almost immediately, so you can update your sources from Hoary/Breezy to Dapper. The final release will be in April 06, since they're every 6 months.

  5. Something to do while downloading the ISO by cciRRus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You might wanna read the review on Ubuntu 5.10 Breezy Badger, while you download the ISO.

    --
    w00t
  6. Wake me up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wake me up when the "Acneous Aardvark" version comes out, ok?

    1. Re:Wake me up. by xs650 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to wait for Farty Ferret.

    2. Re:Wake me up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still waiting for "Waskally Wabbit".

    3. Re:Wake me up. by timothykaine · · Score: 1

      Procrastinating Platypus - The REAL "slack"ware ;-)

  7. Kubuntu is also out. by JabberWokky · · Score: 5, Informative
    It would be nice to amend the post to note that this means that Kubuntu "Breezy Badger" is also available. They are, after all, a matched set:

    http://www.kubuntu.org/download.php

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    1. Re:Kubuntu is also out. by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ditto for Edubuntu. I mentiod both, and a list of new feature highligts, in my submission, which got rejected. It would be nice if editors could add a reason for rejecting posts; it could help submitters write better stories in the future.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:Kubuntu is also out. by JabberWokky · · Score: 0, Redundant
      That's right -- and this is also the first release of Edubuntu, which makes it even more newsworthy.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:Kubuntu is also out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      It would be nice if editors could add a reason for rejecting posts

      Some popular reasons include:

      • Too many informative links.
        Most Slashdotters can only handle failing to read one article at a time, or two at most. Expecting them to fail to follow five or six links in one article would be unfair.
      • Too early.
        It's not fair to slashdot a site before other people have had a chance to read it. Therefore, articles referencing events that happened less than a week ago will typically be rejected. This is "news for nerds", not "news as it happens", guys.
      • Unfamiliar material.
        Slashdotters don't want to read about new things all the time; they enjoy revisiting old favourites, too, sometimes as often as three times a day. The Slashdot editorial policy is based around satisfying this need.


      ...you know, I wish I thought I was joking.
    4. Re:Kubuntu is also out. by zojakownith · · Score: 0
      this is kind of off topic, but hey i have bad karma already 8p

      ive been using windows all my life and i am going to try out linux on my spare box, im either going to use ubuntu or kubuntu but im not sure which. I believe the only difference between the two is that one uses KDE and one uses gnome for its GUI.

      My question is, which one is better, gnome or kde? Does one "just work" and the other not? Does one of them have more powerful features?

      --
      I have bad karma....

      Open source is heavenly, Microsoft is the devil, SCO is going to hell

  8. Upgrading by cloudmaster · · Score: 4, Informative

    The poster forgot the <a href="bash:apt-get update;apt-get dist-upgrade">direct upgrade link</a>. :)

    BTW, if you're looking for an easy to set up LTSP-based distro, Ubuntu's a good choice (IMHO).  The release candidates have been very good improvements over 5.04 - mostly in terms of (lots of) more subtle polish type things.

    1. Re:Upgrading by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      very good improvements over 5.04 - mostly in terms of (lots of) more subtle polish type things.

      Thanks, but I'm not Polish. :P

      What's a LTSP-based distro? Is that the terminal end of a dumb terminal? And why is Ubuntu particularly good for this, over Debian for instance? Sorry, but the website isn't very helpful ...

    2. Re:Upgrading by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I meant a distro that provided LTSP stuff - Ubuntu finally has a nice, easy-to-use setup for an LTSP server and client. Given Ubuntu's strong tie with Debian, though, it's likely that Debian could be just as easy. When you use an Ubuntu server you get clients that work like Ubuntu, though - they get that same, nicely integrated desktop. You could always do the same thing by setting up LTSP or similar yourself, and having the display manager answer XDMCP broadcasts, etc - but all it takes on the most recent Ubuntu is installing the ltsp-server (and ltsp-server-utils, if you don't already have DHCP, tftp, etc) package and running "ltsp-build-client". I was impressed at how easily that worked, having set up diskless machines both with and without LTSP before.

      There's apparently a minimal-like install option (other than "server") that sets an Ubuntu machine up as a client as well, in the event there's no netboot support or something like that, but I haven't tried that route or really looked into it.

      And you don't need to have ancestors in Poland to appreciate the polish. :)

    3. Re:Upgrading by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      And you don't need to have ancestors in Poland to appreciate the polish. :)

      Point taken, and thanks for the quick run-through :).

    4. Re:Upgrading by akeyes · · Score: 1

      eh... you forgot sudo

    5. Re:Upgrading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thought it said "LISP" based distro.

      Almost had a heart attack

    6. Re:Upgrading by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I figured the user was browsing with a root-enabled firefox, ala "sudo firefox".

    7. Re:Upgrading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a troll - that's funny! Sigh.

  9. So, when will ubuntuguide.org be updated? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That site rocks. Got almost everything I could want set up very nicely. I probably won't even move up to 5.10 until Ubuntuguide is updated.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:So, when will ubuntuguide.org be updated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new breezy guide is actually included in the help documentation. I have not found the same guide online yet tho.

    2. Re:So, when will ubuntuguide.org be updated? by anethema · · Score: 2, Informative

      For breezy they have made a faq based on ubuntu guide, but for breezy.

      http://doc.ubuntu.com/gnome/faqi386/C/

      All the ubuntuguide goodness, just kept up-to-date :D

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    3. Re:So, when will ubuntuguide.org be updated? by TravisWatkins · · Score: 1

      ubuntuguide.org is absolute crap. It tells you to do things without explaining what you're doing or warning you of any issues you might have. For example, it used to tell you (until hoary-extras filled the gap and we complained) to enable the marillat debian repository to get libdvdcss and such which caused upgrade issues and conflicts between package versions.

      We get many people in the #ubuntu IRC channel who have followed this guide and broken things badly.

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
    4. Re:So, when will ubuntuguide.org be updated? by netdur · · Score: 1

      System > Help > Ubuntu 5.10 Starter Guide

      --
      "Steve Jobs invented the world" -- Bill W. GATES
  10. Don't like brown? by Marc+D.M. · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're not a big fan of the Ubuntu brown default theme, check out the Blended metacity theme and the nuoveXT icon set. They definetly add a 2005.10 (modern day) feel to the system.

    Go Ubuntu!
    1. Re:Don't like brown? by doubledoh · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to say thanks. Those themes are awesome. Thanks also for introducing me to http://gnome-look.org/ as well. Never really cared much about how the OS looks...but if I can impress friends...they might be more inclined to give ubuntu a try.

      --
      I think, therefore I doh.
    2. Re:Don't like brown? by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

      thanks from me as well. I didn't realize how complete that icon set was. really nice.

    3. Re:Don't like brown? by d0c0m0 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I like the gperfection2 suite which also includes xmms and firefox skins. Clear, usable and minimalist.

    4. Re:Don't like brown? by ethx1 · · Score: 1

      Great links. Thanks

  11. Upgrade working? by B5_geek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will apt-get dist-upgrade update me to breezy or do I need to adjust my repos?
    OR is a fresh install needed because of the gcc4.0 update?

    what command can I type to see exactly what 'version' I am using right now?

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:Upgrade working? by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure about ubuntu, but I'm pretty sure you don't need a new install given that ubuntu is based on Debian SID. You know, when I first installed Sid, packages were compiled with gcc 2.95. Then Debian team changed their default compiler to gcc 3.2 then 3.3 then 4.0. I've never had to reinstall Debian at all, just apt-get update && apt-get upgrade. I've been using sid for more than three years now.

    2. Re:Upgrade working? by DoddyUK · · Score: 2, Informative

      Will apt-get dist-upgrade update me to breezy or do I need to adjust my repos?

      I adjusted my repos to Breezy (as opposed to Hoary) to be sure, although sudo apt-get dist-upgrade works fine for me. However, there's no repository for Breezy Backports yet, so leave your backports repo as Hoary.

      I'm sure the guys at Ubuntu would have figured that a fresh install would have given their users serious headaches (especially with a system as customised as mine).

      --
      Some think the Internet is a bad thing. I just think that AOL is a bad thing.
    3. Re:Upgrade working? by gers0667 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you apt.sources file is fairly stock, then just change every reference of "hoary" to "breezy"...

      Then, just run sudo apt-get update, followed by sudo apt-get dist-upgrade. This takes a while, but once it is done, reboot to the new kernel and you are at breezy.

    4. Re:Upgrade working? by a.different.perspect · · Score: 2, Informative

      Open /etc/apt/sources.list and replace the instances of "hoary" with "breezy". Then run sudo apt-get dist-upgrade. A big download later, and viola!

    5. Re:Upgrade working? by pyite · · Score: 1

      Before the 'sudo apt-get dist-upgrade,' 'sudo apt-get update' should be run.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    6. Re:Upgrade working? by TetryonX · · Score: 1

      Just a slight warning:
      Many people had issues with dist-upgrading during the preview stage.
      For the most part it should work, but if you play a lot in universe/multiverse, be careful. Many packages can break (eclipse for one was somewhat problematic).
      apt-get remove eclipse-sdk, after the update, apt-get install eclipse-platform seemed to work for me.

      --
      [!] No, I can't see my comments. They are not worthy of +3 moderation.
    7. Re:Upgrade working? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Read the upgrade instructions on the Ubuntu wiki

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    8. Re:Upgrade working? by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      This should set off warning bells. "Linux for Human Beings" requires hacking text files to upgrade.

      Meanwhile, do you know how I got my SP2 on Windows? It grabbed it and installed it automatically all through GUI. Of course, it broke half my settings and fscked up some drivers, so that demonstrates how crappy MS software actually is at implementation...

      but my point is UI. The fact is that even the most user-friendly *nix distro _still_ isn't safe for Grandma.

    9. Re:Upgrade working? by cortana · · Score: 1

      If you're scared of the command line then just use Synaptic?

    10. Re:Upgrade working? by Knuckles · · Score: 4, Informative

      Read the instructions. You can fire up the GUI app named Synaptic, click "Repositories", "Edit", change "Hoary" to "Breezy", click OK, click "Mark Upgrades". No cmd line involved.

      Plus, in this case you don't simply apply an SP, you upgrade the whole OS and all applications. There's nothing even remotely comparable in Windows.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    11. Re:Upgrade working? by arodland · · Score: 1
      By recommendation of those in the know (and my own personal experience) I'd suggest replacing that process with
      1. edit sources.list
      2. aptitude update
      3. aptitude dist-upgrade

      It really does do a better job of making sure that dependencies won't break, and when doing a dist-upgrade you need that ability more than ever.
    12. Re:Upgrade working? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I had an openoffice.org2 release candidate installed and the dist-upgrade choked on overwriting files in it. I just did dpkg --remove for each of the colliding packages, apt-get install -f to take care of the partially installed packages, and apt-get dist-upgrade again to set things on their way. I just thought I'd mention this, because this is a fairly common failure mode of apt. I still love apt, but this kind of common breakage really needs to be handled better.

      I'm a happy Breezy Badger now.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  12. Anyone can install Ubuntu... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but will you do it at the top of a mountain? Check out the Extreme Ubuntu Install Challenge!

    "On October 2, 2005, two good friends and I hiked up Middle Sugarloaf Mountain in the White Mountains region of New Hampshire. But this wasn't your typical hike; this hike had extreme geek value. For at the top of the mountain, I was going to install Ubuntu Breezy on my laptop.

    To my knowledge, no one has ever accomplished such a feat in history. Probably, this is because no one would want to. I'd like to change that. Ubuntu geeks of the world, I challenge you - where can you install Ubuntu in an extreme environment? Has Ubuntu ever been installed on a skyscraper window-washing scaffold? On an active volcano? While standing on your head the whole time? Just think of the possibilities!

    When you have a laptop, a mission, and no sense of social shame, anything is possible. What follows is one man's story of hardship and triumph, as he scales a mountain to install Ubuntu linux..."

    1. Re:Anyone can install Ubuntu... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      I bet that machine didn't have a RAID on a Sil 3112a controller. That is, unless you are beefy enough to take the laptop, a tent and a lot of supplies onto that mountain.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Anyone can install Ubuntu... by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
      For at the top of the mountain, I was going to install Ubuntu Breezy on my laptop.

      Didn't use wireless, didn't bring any Ogg-Vorbis. Lame.

      *ducks, runs for cover*

    3. Re:Anyone can install Ubuntu... by Chalex · · Score: 1

      Is that like Extreme Ironing?

    4. Re:Anyone can install Ubuntu... by gmuslera · · Score: 1
      Bah, if you want to do a really eXtreme installation, something that defy your abilities, common sense and really make you risk your life, try installing windows in a nuclear power plant.

      The real challenges are not in the top of a mountain but in yourself. How far you can go? What is the bigger risks you can take? Trying to play GTW with defense megacomputers are things of the past, move forward to the next challenges.

    5. Re:Anyone can install Ubuntu... by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1

      ...I installed it in my flat, which is an environmental health risk, if that counts...

    6. Re:Anyone can install Ubuntu... by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      You can walk beside a man for 50 years, but when you install ubuntu on his laptop while dangling him over a volcano...
       
      ...THEN you know the man.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    7. Re:Anyone can install Ubuntu... by alexander+m · · Score: 2, Funny

      and of course the great thing about doing that at the top of a mountain is nobody can say "man, that guy needs to get out more" ;-)

  13. diet is important by rishistar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let this be a lesson - Keep your badgers away from beans!!!

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
  14. this rocks by fak3r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ubuntu has become my main desktop and laptop (iBook) distro of choice, beating out Gentoo last year. I just did a fresh install of 5.10 Monday on the iBook, and it's just so nice. On the workstation we've been tracking Breezy for about a month now, and the polish just keeps coming. Can't wait till they move on Daper, an am especially excited about it being supported for so many years; you can just feel the momentium.

    Use whatever Linux distro you like, but if you're looking for one to change to, give this a shot, there's a reason there's so much good press about this company.

    1. Re:this rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a question. Why did you get an iBook if you were going to run Linux on it? iBook's are much more expensive than x86 laptops.

    2. Re:this rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are also of correspondingly higher quality. OS X is not the only reason to purchase Apple hardware,

    3. Re:this rocks by fak3r · · Score: 1

      yep, I've gotten this question numberous times, but when I bought my iBook 2 years ago I planned on dual booting OS X and Gentoo Linux. For me the iBook was the perfect form factor, small (12" screen), great battery life, integrated wireless (yes, I had that installed), good memory (maxed it out to 512M on purchse) and just asthetically a nice looking laptop. My job at the time required me to admin many *nix boxes (Sun, Linux, AIX) and since I was used to running Linux to control all of these, having them on the iBook was just natural. Then when I needed to work with Devs on their builds I could bring my laptop to their cube and work on the servers from there to rectify errors. I'd do the same at meetings; fix things while they were brought up in the meetings. Could I have done this with an IBM T21? Sure, but for me, the iBook was just more of what I wanted at that time. With a fresh Ubuntu install the iBook is my favorite thing to check email, surf with at night while I sit in my big comfy chair and sip on some wheat beer. Could I have gotten a pale ale instead? Sure, but I have my reasons. ;)

    4. Re:this rocks by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      The real question is, did you make the beer yourself? ;)

      (It is hard to find decent wheat beer around here

      J

  15. First Linux distro where... by josh2112 · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...everything "just works", the first time, without massive twiddling of configuration files. Or at least Hoary Hedgehog did. This is the Linux distro I recommend first and foremost (Eric, time to switch to Linux buddy!), and 5.10 will definitely be going on my box this weekend.

  16. Cool.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will I be able to just continue from the point I have been with the preview release? Anyone ran dist-upgrade and have it work yet??

    Ubuntu by FAR has been the BEST Linux distro for me. I just want to work on it I don't want to have to compile a bunch of crap (Gentoo anyone) or put up with RPM dependencies (SuSe, Fedora, Red Hat and Madriva). RPM based distros may have yum and apt now, but Debian based distros do it right.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Cool.... by endy64 · · Score: 1

      I did a dist-upgrade from Ubuntu 5.04 a month or two ago and have been updating it daily. I recall no problems and I suspect a dist-upgrade now should be completely painless. Good luck, Ubuntu 5.10 is a nice upgrade :)

    2. Re:Cool.... by peter_gzowski · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not to start a apt vs. rpm flamewar here, but I just wanted to stick in a note in defense of Mandriva, as someone who had tried the last Ubuntu release, and went back. First of all, I haven't put up with rpm dependency hell since learning how to use urpmi. Although I wish Mandriva (and the other rpm-based distros) would just switch to apt as a basis for package management, I do like the Mandriva GUI for urpmi much better than Synaptic. Also, I like the distributions which have central configuration utilities. The Mandriva Control Centre is far more complete and easy to use than either of the KDE or Gnome utilities. Also, WTF is up with Ubuntu not setting up a root password on installation?!? I know that I can do it once I'm up and running with 'sudo passwd' or something like this, but this really screwed with me for a bit. I like the whole 'service servicename start|stop|status' that Mandriva (and I'm sure others) have, which Ubuntu lacks. It does have '/etc/init.d/servicename start|stop', but it's not as consistent, for instance my adsl connection is still turned on and off with 'pon|poff something', if memory serves. Both are Java-friendly, which I like. I can't find the package list, and I can't remember if Ubuntu comes with Eclipse, but the new Mandriva betas come with an extensive list of open-source Java applications (Eclipse, Tomcat, Xerces, Ant, etc.). I could go on, but those are the main points.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
  17. Pentium 3 by Moby+Cock · · Score: 1

    I can get my hands on an 'old' P3 (about 1GHz) system for free. Would this distro be good? I've used mondern distros on older hardware before and I found they ran slow and I became frustrated with it.

    I appreciate any nuggets of wisdom.

    1. Re:Pentium 3 by josh2112 · · Score: 0

      I am running the previous version (5.04, Hoary Hedgehog) on a P3 800 MHz and it works quite nicely. One thing I would suggest is getting something 'lighter' than Gnome or KDE for the desktop. XFCE4 works great for me, has a modern look, but is small enough that it feels really snappy and responsive on old hardware. It's quite easy to install thru Synaptic.

    2. Re:Pentium 3 by mcewen98 · · Score: 1

      I use ubuntu on an Althon 1gz with 512mb's of ram and it seems fast enough for a basic web server running drupal, mythtv backed with a hauppauge tuner, file server, running azureus, etc.

      Gnome could be a bit snappier but it's still usable.

    3. Re:Pentium 3 by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      I can get my hands on an 'old' P3 (about 1GHz) system for free. Would this distro be good?

      I've got 5.04 running on a P3/450MHz, with 512MB RAM. Default stuff, Gnome and all. Works pretty darn well. Slower to boot than on my dual Athlon box, but runs nice and is pleasant for desktop stuff. Its the kids computer and they have fun with it.

      (If you don't want the old system, can you send it my way? :-> )

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    4. Re:Pentium 3 by Arsh79 · · Score: 1

      as long as you have a lot of RAM: in my office I'm working on a 800Mhz Duron with 738MB of ram (and of course "Breezy") and it runs great!

    5. Re:Pentium 3 by WWWWolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ::shocked that anyone would consider 1GHz computer inadequate for anything::

      I've ran a reasonably modern GNOME desktop on a P3-600MHz machine just smoothly without any problems, so I don't think you'll have any problems with a 1GHz machine. Unless you want to play Doom 3 or something.

      (I wouldn't consider even getting an operating system / GUI environment that needs whole gigahertz for itself. Would suck knowing that my 3000+ Athlon would chomp 1000 MHz just to run the OS =/ )

    6. Re:Pentium 3 by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I have a test machine which I use for Oolite-Linux testing (so I can be sure it'll run on a stock nothing-extra-added fresh build). It is a 1.0GHz P3 laptop with ATi Radeon Mobility graphics, from circa 2000/2001.

      It's absolutely fine with Ubuntu.

    7. Re:Pentium 3 by yotto · · Score: 1

      I'm running Ubuntu on a 266mhz p1 laptop, so your 1ghz p3 should do just fine.

    8. Re:Pentium 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am running Ubuntu, "Hoary" on a 233 Mhz Micron Laptop with 128mb RAM. It runs a little slow but very stable. Usable as well. I am also running "Hoary" on a 700Mhz PII with 128mb RAM which runs my server, Apache, MySQL, Mail, Webmin, Firewall, Nagios, and Webalizer just to name a few. It runs very well, incredible uptime but it will get bogged down if more than 10 people are trying to access and run queries at the same time.

    9. Re:Pentium 3 by tritonic · · Score: 1

      Lucky you! You'll want 256 MB RAM to run the full Gnome desktop, ideally. But with less you can always try something lighter like IceWM or XFCE. Enjoy Ubuntu.

    10. Re:Pentium 3 by paxmark1 · · Score: 1

      I am thinking of that for my 700mhz with 256 mb ram. Why is xfce4 better than say icewm. I googled the xfce page, does like like a good windowing system.

    11. Re:Pentium 3 by Digz · · Score: 1

      I run Hoary on a Pentium II 350 w/192 MB RAM at home, and it runs respectably... Nothing lighting quick, but very usable.. Your system should be more than sufficient..

      --
      SYS 64738
  18. Also just released... by going_the_2Rpi_way · · Score: 4, Informative

    Other linux flavours released in the last 24hrs include:

    Piebox Enterprise Linux 3-U6, 4-U2
    Frugalware Linux 0.3
    Damn Small Linux 2.0 RC1
    B2D Linux 20051011
    PHLAK Beta 1 "Littleboy"


    So why are the "-buntu" releases getting all the buzz? It's the animal names, isn't it? And is it pronounced OOBOONTOO (orangutan for overhyped) or YOU-BUNT-TOO (a veiled baseball reference)?

    ;)

    1. Re:Also just released... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
      So why are the "-buntu" releases getting all the buzz? It's the animal names, isn't it? And is it pronounced OOBOONTOO (orangutan for overhyped) or YOU-BUNT-TOO (a veiled baseball reference)?

      That's a pretty racist statement considering Ubuntu is an African word. Are you saying black people are like orangutans? Please take your ignorant attitude somewhere else.

    2. Re:Also just released... by Ride+Jib · · Score: 1

      It is pronounced ooboontoo. And there is so much hype about it simply because it is that much better than every other distro out there.

    3. Re:Also just released... by niteware · · Score: 5, Informative

      And is it pronounced OOBOONTOO (orangutan for overhyped) or YOU-BUNT-TOO (a veiled baseball reference)?

      Ubuntu, an African word from Zulu and Xhosa, is pronounced "oo-BOON-too".

    4. Re:Also just released... by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      How is your post off-topic?

      It seems to me that pointing out that there are also other linux distros releasing new versions is topical.

      I, for one, do NOT welcome our brainless, judgement-addled moderators...

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    5. Re:Also just released... by gmuslera · · Score: 1
      Maybe is not just "just" released, but in the last 7 days were also released new versions of Mandriva and SuSE. Could be interesting a comparision between those 3, not of the bundled packages, but what really makes a difference between them (installation, administration, distro-specific applications, hardware support, etc).

      Using SuSE 10 in this moment myself, and now having included the main difference it had with debian based distros (apt, not so big package list compared with debian, but at least bigger than what is bundled in the dvds) maybe people should change the point of view of what defines or makes different a distro.

    6. Re:Also just released... by JonJ · · Score: 1

      And there is so much hype about it simply because it is that much better than every other distro out there.
      Feel free to point out exactly what is so much better.

      --
      -- Linux user #369862
    7. Re:Also just released... by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Instead of requesting someone to summarize the previous 150 posts for your convenience, you might consider reading them yourself

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    8. Re:Also just released... by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Right, it wasn't OT, it was a troll

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    9. Re:Also just released... by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      I'll give you that it got people talking, yes.
      But the parent and a few other posters offered some good information about other distros current releases, so it's informative.
      Also, the puns are funny...

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    10. Re:Also just released... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu is a Zulu word. It has no direct translation into English. It is taken to mean the general spirit of caring for other people and thinking about life in terms of the the collective good of all people. See the Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu. It is fantastic that Mark Shuttleworth has put his money behind the project. When I lived in South Africa, the license cost of Windows + Office was equal to a month's salary as a college professor. The developing world desperately needs a reliable and easy to use alternative to M$.

  19. List of Mirrors by Znarl · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a list of updated mirrors as the main site is very slow.

    1. Re:List of Mirrors by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      For those of us on dialup, they'll send the CDs, via snailmail, through meatspace.

      Which is nice.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  20. A little late eh? by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 0
    Hmm, I downloaded 5.10 on Friday.. and it was the official release not a Release Canidate.

    Installed quite nicely.. and after some tricky googling.. I found the right information to setup X so that it would work with more than 640x480 res on my Toshiba Tecra laptop.

    The only issue left is that it did not recognise the wireless card I have installed.. so I can't put it on the network yet.

    1. Re:A little late eh? by ozamosi · · Score: 0

      No, you didn't. You either downloaded the release candidate (high probability), the preview release (low probability, a bit older), or the nightly build. The official release was less than 24 hours ago (I don't know what time it was/is at your place, so I can't say "today")

    2. Re:A little late eh? by samjam · · Score: 1

      Please post a link to the tecra stuff you found that helped so much, or just tell us what you had to do.

      Sam

    3. Re:A little late eh? by melandy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only issue left is that it did not recognise the wireless card I have installed.. so I can't put it on the network yet.

      I installed Ubuntu on an old laptop a few months ago, and also ran into trouble with the wireless card. Mine was a linksys, and they didn't have a driver for Linux. I was able to use the Windows driver on Ubuntu using NdisWrapper. Assuming you are having similar driver trouble, this may work for you too.

      IIRC, NdisWrapper was on the install cd (you might have to apt-get or synaptic it to get it on your HD), so you shouldn't have to download it (which is good, since your card doesn't work yet ;^).

      Here's a link to the project...
      http://ndiswrapper.sourceforge.net/

      Here's the install instructions on the wiki...
      http://ndiswrapper.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/index .php/Installation

      You'll also need the Windows driver for you card. You can get it off of the CD that came with it, or they are usually available from the manufacturer's website.

      Good luck,
      -m

  21. SuSe and Mandriva by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    I loaded OpenSuSe last week. Had troubles with Radeon and Centrino but usability was wonderful. A searchbox that highlights menu options...who would have thunk it. Loaded Mandriva lasst night and no real problems with video or Centrino though I had to manually configure wireless after install. But usability is horrible. I selected Firefox during install and they didn't even give me a menu icon or desktop icon for loading it. Same goes for other applications. So nifty menu search either. Might have to give Ubantu a try and see if anyone other than SuSe is trying to improve usability.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:SuSe and Mandriva by b100dian · · Score: 1

      According to folklore, the term thunk was coined by the developers of the Algol-60 programming language, who realized late one night that the data type of parameters could be known with a little forethought by the compiler. That is, by the time the compiler processed the parameters, it had already thought of (thunked) the data types. (http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/T/thunk.html)

      Is it that late at night for you to thunk that?:p

      --
      gtkaml.org
  22. Sweeeeett!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now all I need t odo is install Half Life 2 and OFfice 2003 e...rr. oh crap it doesn't work. Why the hell would I use this again?

    1. Re:Sweeeeett!!! by Swampy0007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      My friend, let me introduce you to Cedega and CrossOver Office. So what were you saying about Half-Life 2 and Microsoft Office not working again?

    2. Re:Sweeeeett!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm... he was saying that he would like to install Office 2k3, which doesn't run under Crossover at the moment.

      And before you flame me saying it does... read carefully. The mention of Office 2003 on Codeweavers homepage concerns it's roadmap, not current product.

      That being said... who gives a flying fuck about Half Assed 2? Want a real game? Install Ubuntu (or any distro) and learn about your equipment. No better game than that one. =)

    3. Re:Sweeeeett!!! by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Crossover office doesn't support office 2003. The latest is office xp. Not much of a big deal, but visio 2003 is pretty good.

    4. Re:Sweeeeett!!! by stickytar · · Score: 1

      I agree. What's the point of having an operating system that only runs some stuff when I can run most everything (plus Gnome) in Windows? Seriously though. We have been talking about Linux on the desktop for years and years and years.... Where are all the Linux desktop users?

      --
      believing the big bang requires a certain amount of supernatural faith
    5. Re:Sweeeeett!!! by rngadam · · Score: 1

      We've been using CrossOver Office for almost a year in a corporate environment and I can tell you that the 7 people using it are constantly frustrated by high cpu usage, bugs, incompatibility, crashes of apps running with CrossOver Office. Using it is mostly hit and miss (opening documents usually ok, but actually editing them not so much).

      A very neat product with lots of potential but limited applicability in a serious work environment.

  23. Bloody amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > at the top of the mountain, I was going to install Ubuntu Breezy on my laptop

    Pah!
    Bloody amateurs

    Every geek worthy of the name has completed at least one lilo / linux install whilst pissed and/or stoned :-)

    1. Re:Bloody amateurs by KrisW · · Score: 1

      I know I have. More than once, in fact.

      --


      "Think you can take me? Go ahead on. It's your move." --Joe Don Baker in Final Justice
  24. Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by a.different.perspect · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm using it right now, and apart from a new splash screen that resembles the forums theme and the replacement of the GNOME foot with the Ubuntu logo in the top left corner, the most immediately obvious changes to the end user are the features introduced by GNOME 2.12. Namely, the menu editor, disks manager, clipboard daemon, Evince document viewer, drag-and-drop preview, type-ahead-find for Epiphany and GNOME's help browser, and so on. That stupid gedit focus bug is fixed. The switch from OpenOffice 1.1.3 to OpenOffice.org 2.0 (Beta 2) is a substantial one as well; xine 1.1 and AbiWord 1.1, unfortunately, were released too late Breezy's dev cycle and aren't included. Similarly, 5.10 has shipped with GStreamer 0.8, which is still unusable for video, so you'll want to install totem-xine over totem-gstreamer as soon as possible. Under the hood, Ubuntu is now using the 2.6.12 kernel, modular X.org and GCC 4.0.1. Ubuntu has also updated their ATI fglrx drivers to 8.16.20, which gives a significant performance boost (from crap to less crap) for those cursed with ATI cards.
     
    Overall, my end user impressions are that this is a worthy and welcome upgrade to my distribution of choice, but apparently I'm only really scratching the surface. According to the release notes, the major features of 5.10 are advanced thin client integration, an OEM installer, the Edubuntu project for deploying Ubuntu in schools, and Launchpad integration ("Launchpad.net is the new infrastructure that Ubuntu and its derivatives use for translation, bug tracking, sharing code patches, fixes and technical support."). So, in short, I like what I'm seeing, but what I haven't seen looks even better.

    1. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by qkslvrwolf · · Score: 1

      yeah, but its really annoying when you just spent all last night downloading the RC. Oh well. I'll just install it and hope that the update button catches any changes betwixt RC and release....

      --
      Or have you only comfort...that stealthy thing that enters the house and guest then becomes host, then master - KG
    2. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Waltre · · Score: 1

      Just run an apt-get dist update. That's the beauty of a Debian based distro.

    3. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by megabyte405 · · Score: 1

      > xine 1.1 and AbiWord 1.1, unfortunately, were released too late Breezy's dev cycle and aren't included.

      Well, there never was an AbiWord 1.1... However, the latest AbiWord 2.4.1 is included in Breezy, as of just a week or so ago - you may want to do another update and dist-upgrade and give it a shot!

      (Disclaimer - Yes, I'm a volunteer with the AbiWord folks)

      --
      I recognize people by their sigs. Is that a bad thing?
    4. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      You mean apt-get dist-upgrade?

    5. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by ninjaadmin · · Score: 2, Informative

      sudo apt-get update followed by sudo apt-get dist-upgrade Would probably work better.

    6. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      xine 1.1 and AbiWord 1.1, unfortunately, were released too late Breezy's dev cycle and aren't included. Similarly, 5.10 has shipped with GStreamer 0.8, which is still unusable for video, so you'll want to install totem-xine over totem-gstreamer as soon as possible.

      What the hell? What constitutes a 'release candidate' to the ubuntu people then? As opposed to debian, who release once every five years, ubuntu releases whether it's working or not?

    7. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by ninjaadmin · · Score: 0, Troll

      Even better when you remember the line breaks.

    8. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Waltre · · Score: 1

      meh, apt-get upgrade, apt-get dist update... sorry, trying to type too fast.

    9. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      meh, apt-get upgrade, apt-get dist update... sorry, trying to type too fast.

      Wanna try that one more time?

    10. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by GozzoMan · · Score: 1

      Mmmh... simpler: Synaptic! :)

      Yes, at the risk to pass as GUI luser, I rather say I love it.

    11. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by TravisWatkins · · Score: 3, Insightful

      His idea of "unusable for video" is "doesn't play all my proprietary crap". This is a plugin problem, not a gstreamer problem. Also, gstreamer does releases like GNOME and the kernel, odd numbers are unstable. 0.9 will be 0.10 when it's finished.

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
    12. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by TravisWatkins · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Namely, the menu editor, disks manager, clipboard daemon, Evince document viewer, drag-and-drop preview, type-ahead-find for Epiphany and GNOME's help browser, and so on."

      Actually, the menu editor is the one I wrote for Ubuntu. The GNOME one only lets you hide/unhide entries.

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
    13. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by megan_of_wutai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, I think he probably means it can't play the video without skipping like crazy and dying often, the performance is many times worse than mplayer or vlc (or I suppose xine, but I don't use that). This being totem-gstreamer.

      Totem-gstreamer also sucks for audio. From personal experience, playing ogg vorbis results in it dying with a nice little dialog box (GStreamer encountered a general resource error) if you use the cpu for anything else at the same time. (this being a 700mhz P3, entirely adequate for the media with any other OS/player)

      It's typical horrible gnome bloat :(. I use and enjoy gnome, but this really is a framework that isn't ready for general consumption.

    14. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by TravisWatkins · · Score: 1

      I guess I just haven't had any of those problems. Then again, I use vlc most of the time because it's what I used on Windows.

      "It's typical horrible gnome bloat :(. I use and enjoy gnome, but this really is a framework that isn't ready for general consumption."

      Well, this "GNOME bloat" is coming to a KDE install near you! ;)

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
    15. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by David+Gerard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it doesn't have modular X.Org - "X.org 6.8.2 with wider hardware support" (i.e., patches). X.Org 7.0 is still at RC0.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    16. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by megan_of_wutai · · Score: 1
      I guess I just haven't had any of those problems. Then again, I use vlc most of the time because it's what I used on Windows.

      Yes, well, sane people do use other stuff, but the fact that totem-gstreamer is the default media player, in the state it's in, is a serious cause for concern.

      Well, this "GNOME bloat" is coming to a KDE install near you! ;)

      I noticed when I tried out amarok, the other day, horrible :(. GStreamer + artssink, ultimate horror!

    17. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Actually it does have a modular xorg

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    18. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Henk+Postma · · Score: 1

      Don't forget beagle either. We finally have a good desktop search without checking out the code from CVS.

    19. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by thing12 · · Score: 1

      Sure, there are separate packages for all of the drivers. But I wouldn't exactly call it "modular" since you can't install one driver without installing all of them.

    20. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, I think he probably means it can't play the video without skipping like crazy and dying often, the performance is many times worse than mplayer or vlc (or I suppose xine, but I don't use that). This being totem-gstreamer.

      No, it just doesn't play video. At least nothing I've downloaded - ever. Granted I'm using the RC version that's been updated to current, but still, I had to install MPlayer separately to even play MPEG videos. That's really not good enough for a user-focused distro - no pr0n == no good! I really like Ubuntu in almost every other respect, but the "out of the box" video support isn't good enough.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    21. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      If you like a full-screen program, but don't want a GUI, you might also want to try aptitude.

    22. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      I noticed when I tried out amarok, the other day, horrible :(. GStreamer + artssink, ultimate horror!

      Very horrible. Thats why you use the xine backend :-)

      mmmm... amarok!

      now playing:
      amaroK - Do It Again by Steely Dan

    23. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Thanks for solving one of my top gnome complaints.

    24. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by megan_of_wutai · · Score: 1

      Oh dear, well that's your fault like the guy said.

      It's not like you want to use totem-gstreamer, but if you do, apt-get install gstreamer0.8-ffmpeg Maybe gstreamer0.8-plugins too while you're at it.

    25. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by megan_of_wutai · · Score: 1

      No, that's why I use mpd and alsa :).

    26. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

      He means modular at the source. FDO has been "autotooling" the monolithic tree for some time now. All those debs come from the same source tarball.

    27. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by kaens · · Score: 1

      I like using synaptic when I want to browse around what's available for me to install from the repositories...but when I know exactly what I want I would rather just use apt-get.

    28. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh, hello Amaranth :)

    29. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Sure you can

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    30. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      If the packages are there to make it work, they should be installed by default - video playback is an normal part of PC use now. I don't mind fixing this stuff, but many newbie users can't (or at least, they don't know where/how to ask for help).

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    31. Re:Um, released. Some impressions on the changes by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      Next time, do a bit of research. Many of us knew when the release date was and wouldn't have dreamed of downloading the RC the day beforehand. ;-)

      Oh and you could use a better internet connection too. :-)

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  25. Release page slow.. by David+McBride · · Score: 4, Informative

    The release page is running very slowly; the official Ubuntu Bittorrent tracker (complete with copies of the .torrent digests) is here: http://torrent.ubuntu.com:6969/

  26. Pay attention to Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay attention to Ubuntu. Its simplicity makes it the Linux distro which might "break out" and cause widespread Linux popularity for the masses: something that has not happened yet.

    One thing holding it back is the overall screen look, and the dumb animal names of the different releases: "Ubuntu? Oh, that must be that kid's computer thing based on the 'Lion King' movie, right?" They need to move beyond the mumpy meerkat and hirsute hyena names.

    1. Re:Pay attention to Ubuntu by jimmy_dean · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100% on all of your points. If they could just get a better theme that looks more clean and less childish and a better naming scheme, it could really compete with anything commercial vendors have out there (not to name any names or anything).

      --
      -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
    2. Re:Pay attention to Ubuntu by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The names like Breezy Badger are just code names (like Longhorn and Whistler were). In the corporate environment, it could just be called Ubuntu 5.10.

    3. Re:Pay attention to Ubuntu by rtrifts · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I very much agree with this. Let me tell you why.

      I'm not a linux fan. At all. I know the rest of you are and that's fine - but I like and use Windows XP. Linux is simply just not for me.

      That said, my wife got a Ubuntu disc (live and install duo) at her university and brought it home.

      We were having some dificulty on a system and as a rescue disc, we fired up Ubuntu the live CD.

      We were impressed. My wife ran it as her OS for a few months, but ultimately relented and switched back to windows. We simply run and play too many windows games for linux to be a real solution for us.

      We have installed it on an older laptop and have been impressed with it. We have passed on the discs to relatives who have difficulty retrieving files or who have "lost" their Windows XP install codes.

      So, coming from somone who really *doesn't like linux at all* - Ubuntu was easy to install, atractive, mostly easy to use and quite powerful out of the box with OpenOffice installed via default.

      I still don't use linux on my machines as there are too many Windows game dev issues I deal with on a daily basis. But if game dev was not a part of my life, I might be tempted to try it.

      So... hell yes - pay close attnetion to Ubuntu.

      --
      .Robert
    4. Re:Pay attention to Ubuntu by drazaelb · · Score: 1
      ...the dumb animal names of the different releases: "Ubuntu? Oh, that must be that kid's computer thing based on the 'Lion King' movie, right?" They need to move beyond the mumpy meerkat and hirsute hyena names.
      Because naming your releases after "Toy Story" is so much more professional than naming them after "The Lion King."
    5. Re:Pay attention to Ubuntu by PeteDotNu · · Score: 1

      That's cool. As you have discovered, Linux isn't intended to be a substitute for Windows - it's an alternative operating system. And a damn good one at that.

      --
      My other processor is big-endian.
    6. Re:Pay attention to Ubuntu by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1
      I totally agree with you. I WANTED to migrate to linux, but could never tolerate the absolute adherence to the command line to accomplish anything. If anyone here has ever noticed, I have ranted on and on several times about how the Linux community needed to come up with an OS that was easy to install, and operate. When I downloaded the live cd of Hoary I was impressed with it enough to download the install iso and put it on a spare hard drive and fire it up. It actually set up my network automatically BEFORE getting to the desktop, and began upgrading itself right there... BEFORE it even finished installing. I was amazed.

      Yes, it's different, and sure there may be a slight learning curve (if you are competent in Windows, you will find this to be pretty intuitive. YOu probably won't get lost easily), but I am totally sold on this. Streaming audio just like Winamp, Dvd player, cd burner you name it, it's got it, or can get it. And the synaptic package manager lets you just browse through and find stuff you want to install. Windows can't touch this at all.

      It's about time for me to kick out my windows, finally.

      --
      Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
    7. Re:Pay attention to Ubuntu by Devil · · Score: 1

      I'd say this sounds like one of the best compliments one could get: a Windows-lover and Linux-hater saying Ubuntu was nice. Thank you, sir!

    8. Re:Pay attention to Ubuntu by JThundley · · Score: 1

      Dude, you just said "solution". What problem are you trying to solve?

  27. Positioned for Education and Enterprise by stevenprentice · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think Ubuntu has a good future and now run it on my development workstation, laptop and server. But, what is more interesting are two big feature they added for Breezy that will make it easier for me to get my clients to consider switching over (including many commercial entities and a pro bono private school.)

    # Thin Client Integration: Ubuntu is the first distribution in the world to include deeply-integrated thin client technology. This allows you to deploy Ubuntu in large scale networked environments or, for example, in classrooms, with a lightweight Ubuntu image booting over the network. All Ubuntu management tools work for the thin client image as well as for the server.

    # OEM Installer Support This release of Ubuntu has special support for OEM hardware vendors. Ubuntu can be pre-installed and tested without configuring end user information. The user will be asked to complete that configuration (name, timezone and password) upon first startup.

    Think about it. If Canonical is successful in getting Ubuntu OEM'd with one of the bigger OEMs, this could be a huge success.

  28. Why is it so good? by xutopia · · Score: 5, Informative
    We always get that question whenever some story about Ubuntu comes out.

    • 1 CD (Freely sent to you by snail mail)
    • Most things are more stable than many other distributions yet is cutting edge
    • It is debian based which means that you can just send off one command to update everything
    • It looks nice

    Anything else you'd like to add?

    1. Re:Why is it so good? by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it's a fricken stable version of Debian Sid! That works flawlessly with my aluminum powerbook out of the box (5.04 didn't, I bugged many things, they fixed them ALL)! Use it!

    2. Re:Why is it so good? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      It looks nice


      Yeah, if you like brown. Lots of brown.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    3. Re:Why is it so good? by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

      I found installing it to be very simple, and using the Synaptic package manager for adding programs is unbelievably simple.

      --
      "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
    4. Re:Why is it so good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say the theme was inspired by Quake 2....

      Anyway, it's not ugly. Brown isn't my preference but I didn't really care enough to switch it...

    5. Re:Why is it so good? by meonkeys · · Score: 1

      I was quite impressed that after installing a few packages via synaptic I was able to compile and run C# program, something I found not-too-straightforward with Fedora Core.

      Packages to install first, including dependencies: monodevelop, libgdiplus

      Then, compile the code pasted here with mcs or monodevelop

      .
    6. Re:Why is it so good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only problem though is broadcom wifi doesn't work with linux yet. Otherwise my powerbook would run ubuntu as well.

  29. Release Theme Song by lbmouse · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  30. Next release... by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cunty Cat?

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Next release... by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      No, Dapper Drake, I believe. I'm waiting for Randy Rhino myself.

    2. Re:Next release... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I'll install Plushy Pussy everywhere, once it's released!

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Next release... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      No, "Pancake Bunny"

    4. Re:Next release... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      You do understand that the names are generally in the form of two words starting with the same character, right?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:Next release... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I've got my bets on Slippery Serpent.

    6. Re:Next release... by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

      'Alliteration' is the word you are looking for.

      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  31. MOD PARENT UP! by werewolf1031 · · Score: 1

    Those links are insanely useful. Already have one torrent rolling in at >150KB/sec. Hell, post 'em on /.'s front page for that matter! I know /. isn't entirely Linux-centric, but a huge chunk of users will appreciate seeing these all in one convenient place. At least give parent an Underrated or Interesting... throw the guy a frickin' bone, and do the rest of us a favor as well.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by vasqzr · · Score: 1


      They're on DistroWatch's front page.

      Here's a link to their Ubunto section:

      http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=02965#0

  32. SATA by cca93014 · · Score: 1

    Will it go straight onto an SATA drive?

    1. Re:SATA by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Will it go straight onto an SATA drive?

      Only if you have a floppy disk with the correct driver on it to hand during the install.

      Oh sorry! I was thinking of the easy to install, desktop-ready Windows XP for a minute then.

      In all seriousness, why would it not install on an SATA drive? The driver for your SATA controller is probably already builtin to the kernel.

    2. Re:SATA by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      Yes. I've got two SATA's and the installed detected them nicely. The only hardware problems I have are with my wireless card and monitor.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    3. Re:SATA by samjam · · Score: 1

      Previous release Hoary Hedgehog wen't straight onto my Dell M70 laptop which is sata; treats the drive as scsi, works like a treat.
      (Had to do a special kernel to avoid some scsi race conditions in 2.6.11 but there were nothing to do with sata, and is fixed in the breezy badger kernel (which I'm using now on HH))

      Sam

    4. Re:SATA by cca93014 · · Score: 1

      Last time I tried to install Ubuntu (about 4 months ago) it couldn't recognise my SATA controller (was on a fairly standard Abit NF7-S board...)

    5. Re:SATA by steveMa · · Score: 1

      I have the prior version running on a hardware SATA RAID array. No problems installing or running. Steve

    6. Re:SATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you filed a bug, right? =)

      On the serious side, I have had a bug report about problems with SATA drives in a couple months now, so I expect it will work. If not, please be clear whether it's failing at first install to see the drive at all, or whether it's failing after it reboots.

      http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/

      Tks,
      Jeff Bailey

  33. Weebl needs to make a new flash toon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Breezy breezy breezy breezy breezy breezy breezy breezy BADGER BADGER!

    http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/

    1. Re:Weebl needs to make a new flash toon by stud9920 · · Score: 0

      aw a snake a snake aw it's a snake, it's a...

  34. Question about the quality by codepunk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now for a usability question, can it play mp3's out of the box? Does it include
    all the movieplayer codecs? If not because they are patent encumbered or restricted give me a frigging button to press that will install support for these. Hell it would take fifteen minutes max to build a gdialog installer with python to do this crap for me.

    From the ubuntu web site

    "If you add the debian-marillat repository to your Ubuntu sources.list (use testing/main), you can use Synaptic or apt-get to install MPlayer, lame, and other tools to deal with non-free formats like DVD and MP3."

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:Question about the quality by uqbeachy · · Score: 1

      Can it install mp3 support, and other proprietary components out of the box? Nope - the reasons for this have already been discussed ad nauseum. However 'Easy Ubuntu' will install all these and more, with a GUI interface just like we love. The link is available off the forums at http://ubuntuforums.org/ - a direct link on Slashdot being a little mean... (hint- there's a link on the front page)

    2. Re:Question about the quality by BlowChunx · · Score: 1

      I think that line is out of date... If you enable the universe and multiverse repositories in your sources.list, you can install mplayer. (Of course, it may be the same package, just in a different place.)

    3. Re:Question about the quality by muszek · · Score: 4, Informative
      Easy Ubuntu and does that stuff and more:
      • Add extra repositories for installing a lot of additional software.
      • Install multimedia codecs for reading all videos, musics and DVDs.
      • Activate the "audio preview" feature in Nautilus.
      • Install the most needed Firefox plugins: Flash, Java, Real, videos. Adds Microsoft fonts, GNOME's Firefox buttons, officials Firefox icons.
      • Install archiving support for RAR and ACE.
      • Install the most used peer-to-peer softwares: aMule (a clone of eMule) and Azureus (for Bittorent).
      • Install the Skype voice-over-IP software. (Warning: at this time Skype is not packaged for Breezy so install don't work)
      • MSN: Install AMSN cvs with webcam support.
      • Num lock: Active the num lock at system startup.
      • Replace the GNOME foot logo with Ubuntu's logo.
      • Install the NVIDIA or ATI driver for 3D support.
      (copied from their site)
    4. Re:Question about the quality by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      Now for a usability question, can it play mp3's out of the box? Does it include all the movieplayer codecs? If not because they are patent encumbered or restricted give me a frigging button to press that will install support for these. Hell it would take fifteen minutes max to build a gdialog installer with python to do this crap for me.

      OK Mr. arrogant... if you reckon that it will only take 15 minutes to build a gdialog installer, then why the fsck haven't

      • YOU
      gotten off your @rse and done it then...
      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    5. Re:Question about the quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hint: !=
      • Re:Question about the quality by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

        If not because they are patent encumbered or restricted give me a frigging button to press that will install support for these.

        That's like asking the seller of water pipes "Well, if you can't give me drugs then give me a frigging map that'll tell me where to find it." There's such a thing as legal liability, and Ubuntu needs none of it. There's more than enough independent people willing to make that for them, there's no reason for them to endanger their project. Remember that unlike Debian or such there's someone with a decent bit of cash behind Ubuntu, and I'm sure they'd love to sue for it.

        --
        Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
      • Re:Question about the quality by SComps · · Score: 1
        if you reckon that it will only take 15 minutes to build a gdialog installer, then why the fsck haven't

        YOU
        gotten off your @rse and done it then...


        In the past I've brought this to people's attention and been moderated a troll, but because I am who I am, here I go again.

        While I *DO* agree this guy was being a real prick, you have continued the tradition and once again shown the level of arrogance found quite often (devs! don't get your panties in a bunch, I didn't say ALWAYS--quite often!) in the open source community. It's the whole "fix it yourself and contribute the patch" mentality. Yes, the original post was a clusterf**k of whining and crap, but the response was little more than the same.
      • Re:Question about the quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Except that the original guy said he *could* "fix it himself and contribute the patch". It wasn't like it was a non-developer ranting and raving: it was a developer stupidly ranting and raving.

    6. One CD? Wasn't Hoary Hedgehog 3? by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      With this announcement, I thought I would go grab the PPC DVD torrent and let the /. effect help me along. I never did get the Hoary Hedgehog DVD image because there never was a working peer for it.

      On the site it lists that combination DVD images have been released. I've checked, they aren't on the list. So has there been a maor spring cleaning or are they just going to release the DVD later so that I'll be stuck with 68% looking for peers...

      I really do like x86 Ubuntu and I'm glad that they have a PPC distro that gets updated at the same time, but so far I can't actually test it until I can download it.

    7. Because it Just Works by HawkinsD · · Score: 1

      I found a clapped-out old 600 MHz laptop with 256 Mb of RAM, running a weird AMD K6 processor.

      Ubuntu offers a "server" install option, which creates a stripped-down no-desktop server machine. After a few REALLY SIMPLE install commands like apt-get install apache2 , I had a fully-operational Web and file server, which I could put in a closet and administer via ssh.

      It just worked.

      --
      Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
      1. Re:Because it Just Works by poopdeville · · Score: 1

        It does? I've used Debian in that capacity for a little over a year now. I've occassionally tried Ubuntu but couldn't figure out how to pare the default installation down. Even knowing that, I'm not sure if I'd switch to Ubuntu. The Debian and Ubuntu apt repositories each have different strengths and weaknesses, but Debian "seems" to have more developer tools. And Fluxbox pwns Gnome. (I occassionally use my server box to watch video since it sees such a small load)

        --
        After all, I am strangely colored.
      2. Re:Because it Just Works by rebelcan · · Score: 1

        I agree with you 100% on Fluxbox. After dealing with the clunky-ness of Windows, I decided I wanted a very sparse, yet nice-looking WM. Hence, Fluxbox.

        Coupled with gDesklets, Fluxbox is the greatest thing I've come across for Linux ( yes, that's hyperbole ).

        --
        God is dead -- Nietzsche
        Nietzsche is dead -- God
        Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
      3. Re:Because it Just Works by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

        Hooray for Fluxbox!

        Tabs... They're not just for browsers!

        And it's nice and light for my 466MHz Thinkpad.

      4. Re:Because it Just Works by kaens · · Score: 1

        Hell, yes. Fluxbox is pure joy. It's like an orgasm in window-manager form.

      5. Re:Because it Just Works by bioglaze · · Score: 1

        I switched from GNOME to Fluxbox few days ago, and it's a great lightweight WM, but i cannot save window positions and sizes even if i check options from the window bar. Tabs are absolutely cool, now i don't need gnome-terminal which was one of the reasons i switched from XFCE to GNOME. Got to set up auto-mounting of usb stick and life gets easier. GNOME has a good feature that when you stick usb stick in, Nautilus opens a window showing its contents, but Fluxbox doesn't have anything like that :-(

        --
        Who is John Galt?
    8. Please mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the links :-)

    9. Do I need to upgrade by CKnight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or does my daily "apt-get update && apt-get -y upgrade" cron job bring me in line with the new release?

      1. Re:Do I need to upgrade by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

        I believe the proper command is "apt-get dist-upgrade". If that doesn't work, you might need to ask at a K/Ubuntu forum.

        --
        I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
      2. Re:Do I need to upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

        First, double-check you have ubuntu-desktop installed, otherwise some new packages might be left out.

        Then you need to change your sources.list. Instructions at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BreezyUpgradeNotes. Just search and replace hoary with breezy, really.

        Then you'll need to apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade (not upgrade, which won't install new dependent packages - you'll get a message saying some packages have been held back). Make sure you look at the list of packages it's going to remove, just in case. Then...wait, and you should probably reboot as well :-)

      3. Re:Do I need to upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        It's "apt-get dist-upgrade" homey.

      4. Re:Do I need to upgrade by CKnight · · Score: 1

        I was trying to ascertain if my regular "apt-get upgrade"s would keep my current version as up to date as the newest release as far as the package versions are concerned, or will I be missing out on something by not moving to the new version?

    10. I think I'll hang on for Windy Stoat by iBod · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or some other flatulent mammal.

    11. Official upgrade instructions by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 4, Informative

      For those upgrading from a previous release, instructions can be found on the official Ubuntu wiki.

      But yes, essentially "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade" is it.

      1. Re:Official upgrade instructions by tqft · · Score: 1

        any idea on how big the upgrade is? On 56k dialup makes a big difference.

        I don't mind 100 Mb (I can leave it running while at work and overnight), but much more than that is too much.

        --
        The Singularity is closer than you think
        Quant
      2. Re:Official upgrade instructions by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

        I pulled down about 500MB of stuff on the machine I just upgraded, IIRC (or rather, on the one that's presently upgrading) - there are 16 packages that aren't upgraded and the rest are (on my system). The good news is that you can run the command with -d and just download them over a period of a few evenings, then run the update later. I guess that's good news. OpenOffice is a somewhere around 100MB by itself, though, and when you throw in xorg as well... I'm pretty sure there are some extra packages on there.

        Oh heck, I'll check my basically default laptop. Just a sec...
        sudo perl -i.bak -ple's/hoary/breezy/g' /etc/apt/sources.list
        sudo apt-get update
        sudo apt-get dist-upgrade


        It says:
        745 upgraded, 262 newly installed, 30 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
        Need to get 117MB/532MB of archives.
        After unpacking 368MB of additional disk space will be used.


        You're in for over 100MB then, more than likely, since both of mine were over 500MB... :)

      3. Re:Official upgrade instructions by tqft · · Score: 1

        Thanks have ordered the cd.

        Have updated the wiki entry with size.

        https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BreezyUpgradeNotes

        Thanks

        --
        The Singularity is closer than you think
        Quant
    12. If you like K/Ubuntu... by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      ... because it's an easy-to-install Debian distro, you might want to check out Debian Pure. That's all it is, Debian with an easy install. Not dissing Ubuntu, not at all (no need to flame me, guys), but I've heard some say that's why they like it; they didn't know there's a real Debian out there that's just as easy to install.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    13. My experince with breezy has been great so far by dmouritsendk · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've been running the unstable/preview release for almost a month, and after resolving a minor DBUS problem i had right after upgrading, its been running extremely solid. The only noteworthy problem I've had is evince like to chrash when reloading/refreshing .dvi documents, this is really impressive for a unstable release IMHO.

      I've been using Ubuntu now for almost one year (I was seeking an open/free alternative to Gentoo), and since then it has become the only Linux flavor I run (well, that and debian for my server). Simply because it gives me the choice of choosing what I want to spend time on. Meaning, I'm not forced to read a multiple pages of documentation to get my digital camera to work, it just works when plugged in. And then if someday I'm like, "Hey, I wanna learn more about HAL/DBUS/whatever" I'm free to mess around with it.

      I know its like this with most distributions today, but since I'm a gnome user ubuntu is a perfect fit with their release schedule trying to follow the gnome one.

      The only remotely bad thing about Ubuntu is the documentation, not that the wiki isn't nice, its just no FreeBSD or Gentoo handbook ;-)

      1. Re:My experince with breezy has been great so far by kalioto · · Score: 1

        I downloaded the release candidate Monday and installed it on an IBM Thinkpad X-40 and am very impressed with hardware detection and overall ease of installation. As a lifelomg windows user, Ububtu makes the switch easy and a compelling case to use their distro as your primary OS. I've already been using GAIM and other open source alternates to popular applications, so the transition is relatively smooth.

    14. Ubuntu is also nice for older machines by helix_r · · Score: 1


      I have installed the base server on an old ibm 385XD laptop with 96Megs of ram. With ICEwm, it makes an excellent kitchen laptop-- perfect for email and recipe lookup.

      The nice thing about that was that I did not have a colossal hassle making it work. Everything I need can be piecewise installed and updated painlessly with synaptic.

    15. And for the older generation we have... by squoozer · · Score: 1

      ...wheezy badger.

      Thank you - leave tips at the door.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
      1. Re:And for the older generation we have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Hmmm, you apparently think we are leaving soon....
        Ok, you must know that your humor is poor. so Bad joke == no tips! :)

      2. Re:And for the older generation we have... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

        But it's Korean language only.

        --
        That is all.
    16. upgrade instructions... by clayasaurus · · Score: 2, Informative

      sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list

      replace all references of 'hoary' with 'breezy'

      sudo apt-get update
      sudo apt-get upgrade

      1. Re:upgrade instructions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        sudo apt-get upgrade

        Are you sure, i should do a "dist-upgrade" instead...

    17. Badgers???? by gstoddart · · Score: 1, Funny

      Badgers?

      We don' need no steenkin' badgers!

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
      1. Re:Badgers???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Holy crap, someone actually remembers UHF! Long live Raul's Wild Kingdom!

      2. Re:Badgers???? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

        Pop, goes the weasel...

        --
        Oh well, what the hell...
    18. Linux Theme? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Where can I download the KDE or GNOME theme so it looks as if I am running this?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
      1. Re:Linux Theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    19. Why LTSP? by xeno-cat · · Score: 1

      I can't figure out why people are so enamored with LTSP as a thin client solution. I have used it extensivley and find it to be horribly awkward, hard to package up, hard to manage, insecure and uses NFS for Gads sakes! I stumbled on Thinstation about a year ago and have not looked back.

      But please do tell me why everyone is so retarded for LTSP, maybe I'm missing something.

      Kind Regards

      --
      "A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us w
      1. Re:Why LTSP? by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

        Honestly, I agree with you as far as the PITA LTSP setup. Like I said somewhere once before, I've tried setting LTSP up several times in other environments, and it's a royal pain, chock full of inconvenient. :) The Ubuntu roll o fit's really nice, though, and hides all that crap. It literally took me about ten minutes (not counting the package downloading and installing that happens behind the scenes without user intervention) to get three machines up and running, one as a server and two as netboot clients. If you include the time it took to set up two VMWare virtual machines and install the Ubuntu server + one client (the third client was a physical machine booting from an Intel card), we're at about a half hour of sitting-in-front-of-the-computer to get three fully functional workstations. Additional machines just take an entry in dhcpd.conf, and that's only if you use dhcp "that way".

        Anyway, I don't particularly care if it's LTSP or something else - this is easy to set up and easy to maintain so far, and it coincidentally uses LTSP for its organization.

        As far as NFS, well, it's about the only network file system that can be used as a network root with Linux, right? I guess with the advent of initrds (not exactly new tech, but really just recently getting useful) I guess anything could be used - but a properly-tuned NFS server is pretty nice. Sure, I use CIFS a lot now, but that's mostly because I like the mapping control I can exert through samba, not because of any real performance gain. NFSv3 has "real" locks and nearly everythign supports it. NFSv4 is pretty close to stably replacing v3 now, and it uses stateful connections - which gets rid of several of the problems people had with UDP-based NFS implementations (and gets rid of the need to run a million daemons).

    20. What about International Mirrors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm South African, you insensitive clod!

    21. But ... but ... but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought wanking was good for you!

    22. Congratulations by viniciuscb · · Score: 1

      Congratulations to all ubuntu developers for the marvelous work!

    23. No more wankery!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I *like* wankery!

    24. Someone has to say it... by Bobb+Sledd · · Score: 1

      "Badgers!? Badgers!? We don't need no stinking badgers!"

      (breezy? phew! What's the next version called, "farty feline?")

      --
      "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye," "I am Bender. Please insert girder."
      1. Re:Someone has to say it... by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1

        I think it's Flatulent Farnsworth.

        --
        Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
    25. ACPI Support in Breezy by zepmaid · · Score: 1

      I've asked this question before....
      Does anyone know whether ACPI works in Breezy?? I installed Hoary on my Dell Inspiron 8200 and I couldn't get suspend to RAM working. I had to move back to Debian testing.

      1. Re:ACPI Support in Breezy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
        Does anyone know whether ACPI works in Breezy??
        It's a meaningless question, really; on some hardware, ACPI will work instantly and effortlessly. On others, it will work with some manual configuration. On others still, it won't work flawlessly, no matter what you do to it. Best to just try it yourself, really.
      2. Re:ACPI Support in Breezy by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

        It works great on my Fujitsu P-2046 - better than Gentoo did. I hadn't been able to suspend since I switched from using 2.4 kernels back in 2002. Ubuntu worked right out of the box, including suspend-to-disk (albeit software suspend, not bios, which I would prefer).

    26. They should do this like hurricanes... by StressGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

      First Acneous Aardvark
      then Breezy Badger
      Carnivorous Caterpillar
      Dapper Dog (or Dudley Do-Right?)
      Enigmatic Elephant
      Fantasy Fox
      Giggling Giraffe
      *Then* Hoary Hedgehog .etc.

      --
      A goal is a dream with a deadline
      1. Re:They should do this like hurricanes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Mark Shuttleworth has stated that in the future (after Dapper Drake maybe---I cannot remember) release names will be alphabetical.

      2. Re:They should do this like hurricanes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        I'm waiting for "Indignant Iguana".

      3. Re:They should do this like hurricanes... by Angstroem · · Score: 1

        ...so "Zealous Zebra" will be the last? :)

      4. Re:They should do this like hurricanes... by mandark1967 · · Score: 0, Funny

        I myself am waiting for the "Screwey SCO" release, which installs MySQL whether you want it or not, and asks you to deposit $699.99 everytime you log in.

        --
        Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
      5. Re:They should do this like hurricanes... by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

        ...so "Zealous Zebra" will be the last?

        well, last before Windows Vista arrives, at least.

      6. Re:They should do this like hurricanes... by Angstroem · · Score: 1

        You mean, of course, Windows Wista or Vindows Vista :)

      7. Re:They should do this like hurricanes... by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

        hahaha - nice!

    27. Obvious by NilObject · · Score: 1

      Why has no one made a "yo momma" joke about the code name yet? Come on, you perverts! Breezy Badger!

    28. mplayer does work by amias · · Score: 1

      sudo apt-cache search mplayer

      and choose one optimized for your architecture. There isn't a generic mplayer apt candidate.

      --
      [site]
    29. God... Where are the mod points I had yesterday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent down...

    30. In case you can't find it... by zootm · · Score: 1

      I think that mplayer is in the "multiverse" repository, if there's trouble there.

      I'm pretty sure it's in the swish new "Add Applications" menu though, to ease that.

    31. Distrowatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is slashdot acting like distrowatch and posting everytime a new linux release comes out? If they have to be fair they have to publicize other distros also otherwise this just aint fair!

      1. Re:Distrowatch by Wornstrom · · Score: 1

        Like who? Apple? Sun? Microsoft's "leaked" release got covered right before this article... Seems slashdot is quite fair about distro announcements, linux is just the flavor that has the most often releases, between all distros.

    32. useless for most of Asia by rngadam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, it is useless for most of Asia because CJK (Chinese Japanese Korean) input is broken:

      https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+sources/scim /+bug/2565

      The fonts are there, the localization strings are there, the keyboard LAYOUTS are there but the input server to transform romanized input (for example) to the Asian characters is not working. Particularly frustrating because Ubuntu has decided on not making it a core part (as it is in SuSE or RedHat) of the distro...

    33. VMWare/Oracle by wandazulu · · Score: 1

      Has anyone installed VMWare Workstation on Ubuntu? I use Fedora only 'cause VMWare works with it (albiet with patches). I much more prefer Ubuntu's method of getting apps and patches than RedHat's.

      Also, has anyone tried Oracle on it? I know you need to tell the installer to ignore the fact it's not a suse or redhat-based distro, but was there any other issues?

      1. Re:VMWare/Oracle by BenjyD · · Score: 1

        I'm typing this on Windows XP running in VMWare 4.5 on Ubuntu Breezy. It's perfectly stable with the normal vmware any-any-update patches applied , but I need to keep the Linux host at 100% CPU all the time or things start to go funny and slow in VMWare. If anyone knows why that is, please help me!

      2. Re:VMWare/Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        The latest version of VMWare worked for me with no tweaking required on Hoary (the previous Ubuntu release).

      3. Re:VMWare/Oracle by HBK-4G · · Score: 1

        Yes, you can. Check out http://www.ubuntuforums.org/ and do a search for VMWare. I've done it on Hoary Hedgehog and I'm sure someone has done so on the Breezy Badger as well.

    34. breezy is nice! works on mhy 800mhz pentium 3! by digitallysick · · Score: 1

      I have an old pentium 3 800mhz, breezy is nice, i like the new adept package feature alot, so i can see what all programs i dont have, or might want/need, to upgrade to breezy in terminal: --> sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list (edit your apt sources and replace references to hoary with breezy) --> sudo apt-get update --> sudo apt-get dist-upgrade

    35. Actually you'll want sudo apt-get dist-upgrade... by DFJA · · Score: 1

      Or it won't have quite the correct results.

      --
      43 - For those who require slightly more than the answer to life, the universe and everything.
    36. Don't know a lot about Linux do you? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      This is not like getting SP2. Security and updates are pretty simple in Ubuntu. You can do it with a GUI or automatically.
      This is like going from Windows 2000 to XP or from XP to Vista. Frankly updating Ubuntu is much easier than installing Vista. And yes I have done both.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    37. Personal Review of ubuntu by shadowdata · · Score: 0

      I been using ubuntu since warty and I have nothing but praise for it. Here are a few things that I like about it. 1) Clean and lean , just one disk , burn and install. 2) Synaptic , excellent excellent program. 3) Very useful guides and great channel #ubuntu on freenode. 4) Bleeding edge yet stable. 5) Fast bootup time Overall , I rate it as 9/10. I would prefer it to have a dvd version thats why I am not giving 10/10. :P

      --
      This is NOT a sig - billy
    38. Another resounding YES! by UncleRage · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I keep a Compaq Deskpro EN (1 GHz PIII, 512 MB, 20 GB HD) in the front of my shop as an open, public net device (well, with a donation jar on the SFF case ;) ). Two things I can tell you:

      1. It runs quick.

      2. It runs solid.

      On any given day, I get a host of questions (From How did you make Windows look like that? To How much does it cost?) and I've sold quite a few of them because of it (six to be exact). Almost everyone that's played with it loves it. And no one has ever said, "It feels sluggish."

      All that being said, I'm generally a Gentoo guy, but Ubuntu makes a great selling point for the newbie linux crowd (easy fellas, I'm not calling it a kiddie distro)-- easy install, simple (and timely) updates, fantastic device detection and a perfect mix of apps (even includes Krita w/ the Kubuntu desktop package). It's exactly what a novice PC user expects -- insert disk, reboot box, answer some basic questions and then use your computer.

      In fact, I'm picking up another lot of these little Deskpro ENs to sit below my gaming stations. Next month, I'll be hosting Linux "classes" so people realize that Linux can be a viable alternative.

      Sorry so long winded an answer for a simple question... but allow me to recap: Yes, a 1GHz PIII is more than enough muscle for 5.10.

      --
      #SickNotWeak
      1. Re:Another resounding YES! by value_added · · Score: 1

        I keep a Compaq Deskpro EN (1 GHz PIII, 512 MB, 20 GB HD) in the front of my shop as an open, public net device (well, with a donation jar on the SFF case ;) ). Two things I can tell you: ... Yes, a 1GHz PIII is more than enough muscle for 5.10.

        You can definitely go lower. There's a large number of Dell GX1 (450-550MHz PIII, 128MB ECC RAM, onboard NIC (PXE boot), sound and video) available on Craig's List or eBay for $50-100. You can install most any modern distro (latest Ubuntu, included) without a hitch and run Gnome or KDE just fine. Some extra RAM and a new and fast hard drive helps, of course, but in the end a perfectly good desktop machine for some wanting to run Linux, BSD, Win2K/XP or desktop, or interested in setting up a server or firewall on their network.

    39. Centrino Wirless with WPA? by mchallis · · Score: 1

      My biggest hassel with a Linux on the laptop is wireless support and especially WPA. How is 5.10's support for ipw2200 and WPA_supplicant?
      MC

      1. Re:Centrino Wirless with WPA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        sadly, I dont think there is one desktop oriented linux package out there with a GUI based WPA setup (including "enterprise" WPA flavors) that is anywhere near as easy as Windows or OS X... :P

    40. Re:One CD? Wasn't Hoary Hedgehog 3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu has always had only one install CD per architecture. They also have one live CD per architecture and one combination install/live DVD per architecture. Perhaps you thought three CDs because there were three architectures or because there are three different disc images, but unless you want both an install CD and a live CD, you only need to download one disc image.

    41. DVD Install Images by EAVY · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ubuntu 5.10 also provides images for installation from DVD. The DVD install image includes all supported packages, including those Not installed by default.

      The combined install/live DVD allows you either to install Ubuntu permanently on a computer, or (by entering 'live' at the boot prompt) to try Ubuntu without changing your computer at all. There are three editions available:

      Ubuntu 5.10 (Breezy Badger)

      Kubuntu 5.10 (Breezy Badger)

      Edubuntu 5.10 (Breezy Badger)

      Please download using Bittorrent if possible.

      --
      -- Eavy (: Linux Is Not UniX :)
    42. A SNAKE!! A SNAKE!! by joeslugg · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Un)official release song and dance here

      (Warning: Flash animation)

      1. Re:A SNAKE!! A SNAKE!! by DoktorSeven · · Score: 1
        ubuntu-5.10# apt-get install python

        AAH! A snake!! A snake!! Oh, it's a snake!
        Failed.
        ubuntu-5.10#
        --
        This is a sig. Deal with it.
    43. Microsoft takes a leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux takes a piss.

      I'l be DLing this tonight, w/ fingers crossed that it will actually work with my vid card. Not holding my breath, tho.

      Ahy can't ATI write some damned Linux drivers??

      1. Re:Microsoft takes a leak by thing12 · · Score: 1

        The fglrx drivers work fine -- and they're written by ATI.

    44. fwaa by geordieboy · · Score: 1

      I'm holding out for Ubuntu Luscious Beaver

      --
      The world is everything that is the case
    45. Details? by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      Okay, so I look through the headlines for stuff which interests me.
      And I find this. Ubuntu has been released. Great. Cool. But... ...what exactly *is* Ubuntu?

      How about writing this in here as well? How about simply telling us that "Ubuntu" Linux has released a new version?

      Instead, you're forcing me to RTFA, which doesn't interest me, increasing their server load...

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
      1. Re:Details? by ubernostrum · · Score: 1

        Let me help you by writing this up in a way you'll find useful:

        Today Ubuntu (Ubuntu is a distribution of Linux (Linux is a Free Software (Free Software is software (software is any program which runs on a computer (a computer, actually more properly an "electronic computer" or "digital computer" is an electronic device which performs programmable computational tasks)) which is licensed under the GNU GPL (the GNU (GNU's (GNU's (GNU's (GNU's (GNU's (GNU's (GNU's (GNU's (GNU's (GNU's (GNU's

        NO CARRIER

    46. 900MHz AMD Duron works well, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With 256M of RAM. Woot!

    47. ubuntu for ppc by Coyot3 · · Score: 1

      hi,

      its good to know that this new project continue up

      my post is not related directly with the subject, but with a "single" problem.

      i ordered Ubuntu CDs for ppc (power processors) because i've an iBook G4.when i try to run setup it crashes everytime when trying detect hardware definitions.

      i want to know if is or not a single problem or if someone has (or had) the same problem!

      best regards

      Paulo A. Silva

    48. Eek, repository is laggy. by jZnat · · Score: 1
      For those who already have Debian or Ubuntu, add this to your /etc/apt/sources.list file:
      # Ubuntu Breezy updates repository
      deb ftp://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ breezy-updates main restricted universe multiverse
      # Ubuntu Breezy main repository
      deb ftp://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ breezy universe main restricted multiverse
      # Ubuntu Breezy security updates repository
      deb ftp://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ breezy-security universe main restricted multiverse
      Now if only they'd make a symbolic link like the official Debian repositories do so that I wouldn't have to manually update my sources.list file each time, and maybe so that they could provide an unstable and testing repository or something. Be wary, however, that the Ubuntu FTP servers are slow as hell right now. :(
      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    49. All I ask... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 0

      I'm a Windows Joe user (or joe developer actually, but anyway), and all I want is a Linux whose desktop looks nearly identical to Windows XP, and has a control panel so i can configure stuff. I also want the sound to work with my ASUS NForce motherboard. How long till a windows-like Linux is written? (and released for free, that is, I already spent $200 in WinXP, why should I spend another $80 on a similar Linux?)

      I haven't been able to run XMMS at all, it always freezes.

      (I tested it with Hoary, but according to the reviews some of the issues haven't been fixed in Breezy).

      When I was posting my issues in the Ubuntu forum (or was it here?), someone from Ubuntu told me that Ubuntu wasn't ready for newbies, and recommended SUSE instead. It's very curious that one of the people in the Ubuntu team said more or less the same thing to a poster today: "Ubuntu is very overrated", and "the sound issues aren't solved in Ubuntu".

      So is this it? The most "user-friendly" linux is just a bunch of hype over a Debian distro? :(

      1. Re:All I ask... by bogidu · · Score: 1

        I feel the same way . . . I just want something that I can make the transition and just start working. Look into Vector SOHO version. I installed it and just started using it . . . . about six hours went by before I realized I hadn't switched back to my XP box.

      2. Re:All I ask... by Burz · · Score: 1

        Ubuntu isn't the most user-friendly Linux, because its still a work in progress. For years publications like PC Magazine and PC World have been giving that honor to Xandros (and Linspire at times). And I think they're right. It's also closely Debian-derrived and usable with the "Debian universe", and the Deluxe version lets you run a list of supported Windows apps via Crossover Office (a nice cushion-- I run DVD Shrink with it). You can get nice Linux-native stuff like Skype preconfigured with it. Hardware detection has always been its strength and I'd say today its definately in the top 3 in this respect. The Xandros File Manager is very Explorer-like and stable, with some bennies like CD-ripping and DVD burning.

        Xandros Open Circulation edition is available via Bittorrent.

        As powerful GUI environments go, Xandros was the first to autoconfigure USB devices, the first to logon to Windows Domains (and even create them!), the first with VPN and encrypted home folders, the first with anything approaching a usable printer setup, and many other boring-yet-crucial features that wouldn't give the average Slashdot Linux enthusiast much of a thrill.

        If you want an almost more-Windows-than-Windows environment, get the new SUSE v10 and install it with KDE. The Control Center dialogs are less elegant than Xandros, and even Windows XP, in that they have GOBS of powerful options dialogs. But they are still dialogs and "friendly" to a non-Unixy power-user. IMO it is a little weak on hardware detection and there's no APT. Their target is Windows power users and admins, so the slickness doesn't mean they'll knock off the rough edges to the extent Xandros does.

        Linspire itself is rather unorthodox: It defaults to root auto-logins (bad) and its package-naming will present more difficulties when you want to grab stuff from Debian. You also have to pay for access to much of the software repository, so its no coincidence that they've marginalized its compatability with Debian's.

        K/Ubuntu is very nice. What it can do, it does well after a couple iterations. And system configuration is at least elegant and approachable. But even by their own admission it needs about another year.

      3. Re:All I ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
        I'm a Windows Joe user (or joe developer actually, but anyway), and all I want is a Linux whose desktop looks nearly identical to Windows XP, and has a control panel so i can configure stuff. I also want the sound to work with my ASUS NForce motherboard. How long till a windows-like Linux is written? (and released for free, that is, I already spent $200 in WinXP, why should I spend another $80 on a similar Linux?)

        You ask for the moon and pretend like its nothing. Its HARD to make an XP copy. Thats not what Ubuntu is. Ubuntu is about making the best unique Linux. If all you want is a copy of XP, stick to XP.

    50. Ubuntu on Compaq Evo N410c by David+Gerard · · Score: 2, Insightful
      http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/n410c/

      My email address is in there for any additions and updates.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    51. Why not games? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I have been developing, playing games and writing papers on Ubuntu since their first release. It seems to do a nice job with that. All you have to do is to get the backports repository access then you have the access to all the Debian packages that includes many games.

      The obvious question of the grand(grand?)prent post as to why Ubuntu is so great, is not an easy one to explain, I guess one just has to try it. I have used Mandriva, SuSE, Fedora, Gentoo (waited 2 days for it to install!) Lycoris (before it was bought by Mandriva) and finally settled with Ubuntu. I guess things just seemed to work right out of the box or perhaps I like the openess and the message behind Ubuntu, or maybe both...

    52. Soundblaster Live 24-bit? by superdude72 · · Score: 1

      Does it autodetect Soundblaster Live 24-bit yet?

      I almost gave up on Ubuntu (actually, Kubuntu) over annoyance at having to find and install the module. How could a card possibly be more mainstream? It should just work. Dselect still keeps trying to overwrite my installation, even though I installed using dpkg. Haven't figured out how to install it with Kynaptic.

      I have been using off-and-on since 1998, and I'm beyond the point where I want to spend time futzing around with this stuff. I have things I want to do within Linux other than figure out how to get my hardware to work.

      1. Re:Soundblaster Live 24-bit? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

        They say Kubuntu is just Ubuntu with KDE but I use Ubuntu and ive used the ubuntu live cd on several pcs without any problems but if i use Kubuntu on the same pcs ill have problems (usually with it not detecting the sound card).. why not try Ubuntu?

        I prefer Ubuntu anyway, Kubuntu is too ugly for me.. but if you really want KDE just install it on ubuntu

        --
        [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    53. Mustelids! by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Farty Ferret
      Odiferous Otter
      Stinky Mink

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    54. Breaks Firefox by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I dist-upgrade'd to 5.10 a few days ago (to beat the Slashdotting of their servers), and it broke my Firefox font handling. For example, all the Slashdot homepage "From the xxx-yyy-zzz dept." subtitles (but not the variable xxx-yyy-zzz, somehow) are illegible, resembling greyed-out skinny elvish runes. As are the "Important Stuff" bullet point sentences below in the page in which I'm posting this message. If I select all the text by click/dragging the cursor, it appears, as well as "wiping" the illegible window with another foreground window. And what's strange is that Firefox run as root doesn't show this bug at all. The bug appears to manifest anywhere the "Serif" or "Sans Serif" fonts appear in Firefox, which can't be changed in its Preferences to another "standin" font. I've (laboriously) reinstalled my fonts, but no help, and dist-upgrade'ing again today (with some delays) hasn't fixed the problem.

      That whine isn't really the important Ubuntu point (though it's ruining my day). The important point is that this kind of major release shouldn't have that kind of bug. I'm running straight hoary dist-upgrade'd to breezy on its final release candidate (and then final release). Ubuntu, like any distro, is really a package QA release project. The entire job of the team is to ensure that it's releaseable when it's released. But this bug would make any nongeek flee Ubuntu, and maybe Linux, immediately, possibly never to return. I'm running it on a Dell Inspiron 8000, which sits on a lot of desktops (especially people who don't upgrade more than once in 5 years, who typically can't understand bugs like this). A professional distro shouldn't fail like that, especially in a way which leaves no answers. I posted the bug in even greater detail on Ubuntu forums - it's gotten dozens of looks, but no replies. I expect better from Ubuntu, because I hope it will become the wedge which takes over Desktop share from Windows. Not today.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    55. What kernel version are we at? by presarioD · · Score: 1

      Is ACPI fixed yet? I have currently frozen time at 2.6.8-1.521, last known kernel to implement ACPI properly on my laptop...

      --
      Yam, yam, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade
    56. 6.10?? by arhines · · Score: 1

      Has anyone else noticed that dowloading directly from the Ubuntu site gives you a file called "ubuntu-6.10..." rather than 5.10? If it weren't my favorite open source group, I would think this was a little fishy... Hm.

    57. Anyone got freenx working under breezy yet? by alyandon · · Score: 1

      I compiled the sources from http://debian.tu-bs.de/project/kanotix/unstable/ to create the .deb packages. After installation and configuration (nx user was added, local user was added to nx server allowed list, there are no ssh authentication problems), any attempts to connect via the nx client ultimately fail with no indication as to what went wrong.

      The indentical setup works on my Mandriva box so this is really making me scratch my head as to what could be going on.

    58. Pointers? by Pac · · Score: 1

      While downloading it, I am trying to determine what makes Edubuntu a better choice for a school environment (in order to be able to convince some schools admins I am in contact with to migrate from Windows) - specially, what features and packages are found in Edubuntu that would be required/nice to have in a school lab. Either I failed to find the links or their website is too incipient yet. Any pointers?

      1. Re:Pointers? by rusty0101 · · Score: 2, Informative

        You will have to do more research for yourself, however from having looked at educational distributions in the past, the primary goal is to set up a thin client based infrastructure that allows the school to deploy a large number of very low cost workstations, often without hard drives, that the students will use as their desktop. Memory, video card, sound card, keyboard, mouse, display and case. Possibly a CD and or floppy drive, though it would be unlikely to include a cdr/cdrw drive. Possibly a USB port, possibly not.

        This is then supported by one or two farily large servers that most of the applications are actually run on or at least from.

        Advantages for the school include the possiblity that they can just strip out the hard drives from systems that won't support the latest distribution of Windows, and effectively have zero or very low cost per workstation to move to Linux. A centralized account management structure where the school can insure that sutdents are only maintaining school related work in their storage folders, while providing an infrastructure that is disaster tolerant if they have implemented periodic backups of that online storage. If a vandal destroys a workstation you are not spending a day or more replacing it, updating all of the software with the current patches, etc, you simply replace it with an off the shelf spare, or pick up a bare bones system and put the appropriate network boot firmware on a network card if the bios does not already support booting off the network.

        User interface is usually either a X windows desktop, or possibly a vnc or other thin client desktop. It can even be rdesktop if you insist upon using a windows platform for some reason.

        All that said, I do not know what of it is included in Edubuntu.

        -Rusty

        --
        You never know...
    59. Why Go From Debian to Ubuntu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm seriously considering migrating away from Debian because some of their package maintainers don't update packages while making it difficult for other people to take over the responsibility.

      I primarily use Debian for servers because that is where it shines. But important server-related packages like vpopmail-bin are simply not getting updated:

      In Debian UNSTABLE, vpopmail-bin last updated on 10 Jun 2004 with version 5.4.4. There are 6 (six) new upstream-stable releases of vpopmail-bin that are being ignored by the maintainer. In fact, this 273 days old bug report complains about 5 (five) upstream-stable releases being ignored by the maintainer in the UNSTABLE branch, Pawel Wiecek (coven@debian.org):

      "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug= 290245"

      I wonder why Debian management doesn't implement automatic monitoring of package maintainers and their performance. In some cases, having no maintainer is probably better than having a bad maintainer. It shouldn't be hard to do given the infrastructure already in place. For example, the above maintainer's current status can be obtained by using a URL such as:

      http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint =coven@debian.org

      I'm seriously considering a switch to Ubuntu because of issues like this with more than one package that is important to me. I've never had any problems like this with FreeBSD but my hosting company only offers Linux distros (and great hosting companies are VERY hard to find so I'm not willing to switch just for that).

      I get the sense that Ubuntu is more practical than Debian for people that need to get shit done without all the power trips or license discrimination (for example, intentionally handling non-GPL licensed projects improperly in hopes that people migrate to or even startup competing GPL projects regardless of technical merits).

    60. So much for community - Breezy on Yom Kippur? by sweetnjguy29 · · Score: 1

      I found myself somewhat annoyed that Breezy was released on Yom Kippur, the most holy jewish holiday of the year. Many orthodox jewish ubuntu users won't be able to install Breezy until tomorrow. How rude!

      Honestly, I don't think there was any sort of ill-will or anti-semetic overtones...just a lack of forethought. But if ubuntu prides itself on being a community of humans who respects each other...then releasing a distro on a major jewish holiday where members of that faith can't work...is sorta...unthoughtful.

      1. Re:So much for community - Breezy on Yom Kippur? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

        Are you crazy? If we take all religions and other crackpot stuff into account, distros would only be able to release on 20 days per year or something. Seriously, if a distro released on a day that is a holiday for me, or simply on a day where I have something else to do, what's the problem with simply installing the next day?

        --
        "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    61. Please, put you bandwidth where you mouth is by Pac · · Score: 1

      I urge everybody here who thinks Bit Torrent is the best idea since Ethernet to download the iso images via torrent and leave their clients open until the share ratio is at least 100%. Remember, more people sharing means smaller download times for everybody (and incidentally, more instance of Bit Torrent being put to good, legal uses next time somebody asks).

      1. Re:Please, put you bandwidth where you mouth is by ethx1 · · Score: 1

        I'll do you one better. I set it to download before I left home from work, about 8 hours ago. One can only imagine what the share ratio will be whe I get back home. Now I am begining to wonder if I should have done that with a torrent that I knew would be hammered.

    62. linux.com zero knowledge review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't think that linux.com reviewer actually 'reviewed' anything.

      The server install provides a good base for setting up the packages you need for your server. You should be able to find all the packages you might want to run a file, Web, or mail server.

      Uhm... no. The "server" install in fact doesn't install any services at all (hell it doesn't even install perl). It also doesn't install any graphical desktop stuff. That of course means you can configure your server post-install to do only what you want (and lessen your security risk from running services you aren't aware of).

    63. Linux game dev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not be aware of this, but game development is good under Linux also. E.g. you have full NVidia driver support. Using SDL you can be cross-platform pretty easily (this is what Unreal Tournament uses). KDevelop is a good IDE.

      Now, if you want certain tools that are only available on Windows, that's another issue; but I find development to be much less frustrating in general on Linux because you can get the source for anything (except those NVidia drivers!). If you've been developing on Windows for a long time, you will have run into various Windows issues where the docs don't exist or don't match up with what the system actually does. Going to the source (kernel, C library, or otherwise) answers those questions.

      You also have good version control with good web integration (SVN, Mercurial, etc.), full 64-bit AND SMP support for years (makes a difference on the server side for games), and you can install compilers, IDEs, debuggers, and all the other dev tools without having to worry about licensing or purchasing.

      1. Re:Linux game dev by Devil · · Score: 1

        Well, yeah, but Linux gaming still doesn't hold a candle to Windows gaming. After all, they have DirectX; we have eighty-nine thousand different sound cores. I wish I were a developer, because if Linux could develop a solid competitor to DirectX, Microsoft would indeed be in (even more) dire trouble (than they are already).

    64. Server up in flames! by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Apparently every server I know of for grabbing the .torrent is on fire. Anyone have a a non /.'ed link to the live/install DVD torrent?

    65. Re:Root vs admin by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Something from that article the parent listed I really agree with:

      Experienced Linux users may find it odd that the Ubuntu installer does not prompt them for a root password. Instead of having a root user, Ubuntu uses the first normal user as the admin user. Instead of having root privileges all the time, however, Ubuntu uses sudo to manage system administration tasks. Mac users will recognize this behavior, since Mac OS X works essentially the same way. You can set up a root user if you need to, but this system works well for newer Linux users who may not be used to working as root.

      I found this odd when I installed Ubuntu for the first time too, but it seems logical not to have a root account by default for security reasons especially for people who aren't familiar with best practices.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    66. Just a few minor complaints... by mattotoole · · Score: 1

      I've been using Ubuntu for awhile, first the live CDs and now the hd-install version of Breezy. FWIW I started with the pre-release Breezy, but with the automatic updates I'm now using the latest official version. So far it's been great, but I have a few minor complaints. First, it's a slow on my 700 Mhz laptop w/ 384k -- slower than KDE or Windows on the same machine. Mozilla in particular is slow rendering tables, etc. But I like Ubuntu's desktop so much better overall that I don't care. Second, there's no convenient WiFi management tool, to scan and choose from available networks. The Networking applet will discover and connect to open networks, but it doesn't always work, nor will it always pick the one you want. Otherwise you have to find out the SSIDs ahead of time, create a connection in the Networking applet, and connect manually. Third, because of licensing issues, browser plugins and codecs have to be downloaded and installed separately. This is easy enough for technical users who know what they want, but non-technical users have to choose from a dizzying array of sound and video players, and codecs to go with them. Aaack! There's plenty of installation help at ubuntuguide.org, but more guidance about "the right setup" would be helpful. Fourth, burning a CD is confusing until you do it a few times. Fifth, for some weird reason, my HP printer wouldn't work, even though it was in the list of supported printers. I say weird because I've never had a printer problem with Linux. Finally, as with most Linux systems, suspend/hibernate is nonfunctional or flaky. OTOH, Ubuntu boots and shuts down faster than my Windows system wakes up or hibernates, so for me this is a non-issue. The only thing I need to suspend for is to swap a drive, but with floppies disappearing I never do this anymore anyway. I haven't thought too much about the security issues involved with relying on sudo instead of using a root account, but in practice it's very convenient for a single user machine. This is one thing that drives me nuts with Windows -- repeatedly logging in and out of regular and administrator accounts. So while a few things may be a pain, I have many more complaints about Windows than Ubuntu! --

    67. Re:Why do we love Ubuntu AND gentoo by fortunate_monk · · Score: 0

      I have had just about the opposite experience. Ubuntu was my introduction to linux with their first release and I enjoyed it. After using it for a few months, though, I found that there was so much going on that when something went wrong or I wanted to make a change I didn't know where to start. Enter gentoo. With gentoo I have built a desktop system that has everything I want (including gaming) with very little bloat. And by building that desktop I know far, far more about linux and the bones of my system. I still recomend Ubutnu to anyone making their first leap into using linux or who wants a solid full featured desktop on a more powerful machine, but gentoo offers a solid distro that will grow (and shrink) with you.

    68. Anyone: what PCI Wireless cards work natively? by boomgopher · · Score: 1

      I need to buy one, and I'd like to avoid the ndiswrapper stuff, and googling for chipsets, etc is taking forever.

      Anyone know a model that "just works" with Ubuntu?

      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
      1. Re:Anyone: what PCI Wireless cards work natively? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Under Ubuntu Linux 5.10 any card based on the rt2500 chipset will work right out of the box. I have 2 such devices one pci(for a desktop) and one pcmcia (for my laptop). You don't have to do anything special to set them up. The installer does not recognize the wireless nics at install time. So be sure to have an regular ethernet nic available so you can do the install time updates. Once you boot up into gnome for the first time, you will be able to configure and select your wireless devices via the gnome network manager flawlessly.

        I purchased both wireless nics from newegg. The rt2500 devices are usually under 30$.

        I use the GIGABYTE GN-WPKG wireless pci card, it is 20$ at newegg:

        http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16839121008

        here is the rt2500 project page:

        http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/wiki/index.php/Main _Page

        you can find a list of compatible hardware from there.

      2. Re:Anyone: what PCI Wireless cards work natively? by boomgopher · · Score: 1

        You're the man, thanks bud.

        --
        Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    69. Does Korean support work? by jrleek · · Score: 1

      On Hoary Hedgehog Korean support didn't work. In fact, if you even tried to add Korean as a keyboard layout, you got errors. So, does Korean work on Breezy Badger?

    70. http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/ by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Can't believe this is slashdot, more than 600 comments and I am the first to say BADGERBADGERBADGER

    71. There is little competition for Ubuntu by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      Sometimes people ask if Ubuntu is up to hype. But if you think about, Ubuntu has little competition. How many distros

      1- Are totally commited to freedom
      2- Have the sole purpose of helping the community*. Are the real deal, not a crippled version of the paid version (this is specially important, and one of the main causes of the other points)
      3- Are serious and professional (no RandomGeekPersonalDistro, please)
      4- Are focused on usability("Just works", marvelous default package selection, short release cycle with awesome QA, etc.) , good to newbies and experts.**
      5- Have great support both from vendors and an outstanding community*** ?

      Ubuntu found an almost unexplored market. Its no wonder it is so successful. There is great future for them.

      * Canonical being for-profit doesn't invallidate the point. Shuttlework has made clear that the money is secondary, Canonical won't yield huge profits and he doesn't expect it to make him any filthier rich than the already is. And the management of Ubuntu has flawlessly reflected this.

      ** The "just work" factor is one of the best, and I only don't say *the best* because I haven't tested everyhing out there. I mean excellent hardware support, tight and careful selection of default installed packages , very simple but efficient installer... even the menus are greatly organized. And of course, the usability and maintainability magic of apt and synaptic, now made even easier with the enhanced "Add Applications" tool. And the great release cycle, providing you the latest and greates without resorting to untested packages or compiling from source (still possible if you like but not necessarry). Their QA is amazingly good but still fits in a 6 month schedule. I could go on and on.

      *** Great community. Very helpful forums, great help on the web (like www.ubuntuguide.org), agile developers that fix bugs in a second (which is a pleasure to the geek reporting the bug, and stimulates him to report more). Canonical providing support and calling other companies to do the same is good too. All this and the efforts of Canonical to partner with vendors (the HP deal, the OEM installer...) suggest that there is great future for this distro. This distro is well regarded, see for example the partnership with HP and certain commercial programs having versions for Ubuntu when the distro was in its early days, and, well, all the hype around it.

      1. Re:There is little competition for Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Unless you can't follow directions, and don't know how to read a simple, couple page, hand-holding guide, take a look at Gentoo.

    72. I love Ubuntu... by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

      I love Ubuntu for the soothing warm earth toned theme... Sick of the neon blue-green crap. I love wool sweaters and hot cocoa too. Mmmmm... hot cocoa...

      --
      MadOgre.com
    73. Obligatory Sillines by Phreakiture · · Score: 1
      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    74. Free CDs by BlueCollarCamel · · Score: 1

      I've yet to read anyone posting about the fact they ship free CDs too. Not the free except for shipping crap, but actually at no direct financial cost to you. More info here: http://shipit.ubuntu.com/

      --
      1&1 - Cheap domain and web hosting.
    75. PPOE by kaens · · Score: 1

      So does PPOE work out of the box yet?

      1. Re:PPOE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Just type sudo pppoeconf in a shell and surf the web into the sunset

    76. Re:Root vs admin by arodland · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think it's pretty sensible. If you want to be able to log in as root, it's as simple as adding an ssh key or 'sudo passwd'. But of course there are some well-known advantages to never actually logging in as root.

    77. I'll get right on that by zurmikopa · · Score: 1

      *Puts surrounding nodes on the queue to explore*

      Oh wait, **AA, not A*.

      *Puts customers on the queue to sue*

    78. Bouncing Ballmer? [n/t] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nt

    79. Still reminds me of mini-skirts by NotZed · · Score: 1

      Despite comment being erased.

      Stupid yanks.

      --
      _ // `Thinking is an exercise to which all too few brains
      \\/ are accustomed' - First Lensman
    80. Kubuntu. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

      You do know that you can get Ubuntu with KDE, called Kubuntu, right?

      --
      Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
      1. Re:Kubuntu. by afd8856 · · Score: 1

        What's the difference to having Ubuntu+KDE installed?

        --
        I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    81. Dual-boot Windows and Ubuntu by 1336 · · Score: 1

      "We were impressed. My wife ran it as her OS for a few months, but ultimately relented and switched back to windows. We simply run and play too many windows games for linux to be a real solution for us."

      The simple solution would be to dual-boot; Windows for games and Ubuntu for everything else. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WindowsDualBootHowTo

      That's how I have my computer set up... but I'm not a gamer, so my Windows partition takes long naps (I boot Windows on Patch Tuesdays to make sure I'm up to date :)

    82. Re:Root vs admin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as simple as adding an ssh key or 'sudo passwd'.

      Those both modify the system disk, and needlessly. If all you want is to login as root, then "sudo su".