Slashdot Mirror


Classic Star Wars Trilogy Finally on DVD

chinton writes "From starwars.com: 'In response to overwhelming demand, Lucasfilm Ltd. and Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment will release attractively priced individual two-disc releases of Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi. Each release includes the 2004 digitally remastered version of the movie, as well as the original theatrical edition of the film. That means you'll be able to enjoy Star Wars as it first appeared in 1977, Empire in 1980, and Jedi in 1983.'"

673 comments

  1. All I want to know is by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    is the nipple still intact?

    1. Re:All I want to know is by tommertron · · Score: 0

      What nipple? Give us a link!

      --
      Random rants about technology: http://technorants.blogspot.com
    2. Re:All I want to know is by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Informative

      He's probably referring to Jabba's slave dancer's wardrobe malfunction, in ROTJ, just before he flushes her down the drain.

    3. Re:All I want to know is by hkgroove · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dunno, we'll have to find out. My VHS copies are dying. There is still good in you, George, I can feel it!

    4. Re:All I want to know is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My VHS copies are dying

      And I can finally get rid of my laser disc player! the OT was the only remaining movie that I haven't replaced on DVD yet.

      Then I'll have to start over in HD.

    5. Re:All I want to know is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you go:
      http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=8&t=7387

      Enjoy, Jabba The Wuss.

    6. Re:All I want to know is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to your room, you should be ashamed of yourself for watching episodes 1-3 and not 4-6!

    7. Re:All I want to know is by ffrinch · · Score: 4, Informative
  2. In response to overwhelming demand ... by tomhudson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who are these people and when can we shoot^Wmedicate them?

    1. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by aug24 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry, in this modern world, you can't shoot *first* unless you're the baddy...

      You'll have to wait till the SW fans try to shoot you and miss.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just put some scapegoat in a Jedi coat and have him charge you with a light sabre to have an excuse to round 'em up and slaughter them. Worked well before.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You'll have to wait till the SW fans try to shoot you and miss."

      Don't panic. It sounds tougher than it really is. You can get right up in their face and they'll STILL miss.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by shreevatsa · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're acting like George Lucas, insisting that one needs an excuse (Lucas's official line is that Han shooting Greedo first makes him seem cold and heartless, nevermind the fact that Greedo had a gun pointed at him, and besides, "cold and heartless" is how we like Han, anyway). To counter that lame line, someone put together this page: Top 10 Other Things that Han Shot that Didn't Shoot at Him First.

      To the GP — your thoughts about Han and Greedo might be slightly altered after you see this alternate version ;)

    5. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't panic. It sounds tougher than it really is. You can get right up in their face and they'll STILL miss.

      So Dick Cheney isn't a Star Wars fan, I presume.

    6. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      It is not me.

      I still have my Laser Disk verison. Both Original and Remastered!

    7. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You comedy impaired fuckwit, the ^W thing hasn't been funny since about 2000.

    8. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful
      When I revealed that I (a) bought the 2004 versions and (b) liked them... a lot, there were people I knew who didn't want to talk to me, and I got some barbed comments against the notion in my journal.

      There are a lot of people who have a particular memory of how things were, and want that memory respected. I think, in all seriousness, there's only one serious flaw in the 2004 remakes, the whole Han-on-Jabba's-tail thing. The Han and Greedo shoot each other simultaneously is, really, nothing. It doesn't matter. It would never have been an issue, nor changed anyone's view of Han as a character, had it been that way in 1977. It only matters because it's a change, and because it replaced an even bigger change in the (awful) 1990s releases. For the most part, the 2004 versions fixed the ugliness of the 1990s versions. The CGI is fixed. There are no serious characterization issues (beyond Jabba's tail.)

      I think this release is a good thing. There are people who'll watch both and will say "1977's for me, it's the real deal, I'm never going to like anything else", and there are others who'll watch both and say "You know, now I've seen it, I don't think my fears about the 2004 version are realised." We'll see.

      Hopefully the number of valueless idiots who keep comparing Lucas's wish to keep his movies true to his vision to an act of terrible violence perpetuating largely against women will dwindle too. There's no excuse any more for it.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are these people and when can we shoot^Wmedicate them?

      They're called cineasts and they demanded to have the unwrecked versions on DVD.

    10. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      ... and Spaceballs is still better entertainment value, and stands the test of time better than, Star Wars.

      Which would YOU rather watch - a rerun of a 29-year-old movie, or Spaceballs 2?

      People are going to buy this because the either:

      1. want to complete their "collection"
      2. want to relive being 30 years younger for a few hours
    11. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by nelsonal · · Score: 0

      So you don't like grits, huh?

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    12. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Chelloveck · · Score: 1
      You're acting like George Lucas, insisting that one needs an excuse (Lucas's official line is that Han shooting Greedo first makes him seem cold and heartless, nevermind the fact that Greedo had a gun pointed at him, and besides, "cold and heartless" is how we like Han, anyway).

      That's the thing that really bothered me about the change. Lucas, after the other movies came out, didn't want Han to seem cold and heartless at the beginning when we see later that he's not such a bad guy. You know, most people call that "character development" and consider it a good thing. You want him to seem cold and heartless up front; that makes it so much better when he saves the day.

      But what do I know, I'm just an engineer, not Cinematic Master...

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    13. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by sk8dork · · Score: 1

      i wasnt even born until the 3rd one came out...my reasoning is that the originals _were_, in fact, better.

      --
      ...all cock-blockery aside...
    14. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 4, Funny

      3. I don't remember seeing Episodes IV through VI (I was more into Star Trek as a kid) and I'd like to pick them up to find out what happens with this whole Darth Vader guy from Episode III that I just watched last week for the first time. Does he ever figure out he has two kids? Will he make up with Obi Wan? Whatever happened to the Jedi order? Did it die off or are there still Jedi out there? What about Yoda? Whatever happens to him? I think I'm officially hooked on this whole Star Wars thing and I'm dying to know how it all turns out so I'll be sure to pick up these DVDs. For example, whatever happens to Jar Jar Binks after Episode III? Hopefully Episode IV will clear that up.

    15. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Q. Who shot first?
      A. Who cares, as long as you're not the one with a hole in you.

      Considering that Lucas' "original vision" was for a 9 or 12-story saga ...
      http://www.themovieblog.com/archives/2004/09/mark_ hamill_spills_some_dirt_on_star_wars_episodes_7_8_ and_9.html
      http://www.epinions.com/content_4057571460

      ... I guess the force left him ...

      Not to take away from what he's done in terms of pop culture, but it would have been better if he'd stuck to the original idea. The first two episodes of the prequil smack of trying to recapture the ET franchise.

    16. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by optimus2861 · · Score: 1
      There are no serious characterization issues (beyond Jabba's tail.)

      There are more problems with that scene than stepping on Jabba's tail. The whole scene just plain shouldn't be there. One, the dialog is effectively a rehash of everything that was said in the Han/Greedo conversation -- because when Han/Jabba got cut all the relevant information was moved into the Han/Greedo scene (in fact the line "Even I get boarded sometimes," was edited into Han/Greedo from Han/Jabba -- note Han is off-screen in Han/Greedo when he says it). Two, the Millenium Falcon is seen in the background, ruining its proper introduction when Luke first sees it ("What a piece of junk!"). Three, seeing Jabba here really undercuts his threat to Han -- Han takes on Luke & Obi-Wan as passengers to earn the money to pay Jabba off, he says in Empire that if he doesn't pay off Jabba he's a dead man, and when we finally see Jabba in Jedi he's got Han strung up as a piece of artwork. Stepping on the tail just compounds this undercut. Throw in a pointless Boba Fett cameo and the total uselessness of the scene is complete.

    17. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Darned, that has to be the funniest thing I've read in a while.

    18. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      And then there's a totally different set of people hwo, upon seeing the remastered versions for the first time go: "What the fuck is all the fuss about?". It's not that the originals are sacred or anything, it's just that the remastered version didn't do anything particularly new or groundbreaking.

      The originals work, and I'm glad they're bringing them out, won't have to rely on my torrents of the original LDs...

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    19. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by B_Realll · · Score: 1
      It would never have been an issue, nor changed anyone's view of Han as a character, had it been that way in 1977

      If Lucas had originally had Han shooting second, but changed it to him shooting first there would have still been purists upset. It is not a minor thing to change a character's entire arc. The reason the actual change is so bad IMO, is that it was made in the name of political correctness. Look at the hoopla over changing the ESRB rating of Oblivion in the news lately. I don't know about you, but I'll be damned if I let the PC police make changes to a major staple of my childhood (by proxy through Lucas or otherwise). That's my $.02 anyway.

      --
      now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb.
    20. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I agree. I was refering to the entire scene as "Jabba's tail", largely because that's the worst aspect of the whole thing, but I'm bewildered that Lucas thinks it's a remotely useful scene to begin with.

      I suspect this was one of those things where you film something, and get it in your head you want to include it, without ever stepping back and asking yourself "Why?" Had the SFX been available in 1977 to complete it, I wonder if Lucas would have kept it after seeing it in the early cuts of the movie at an early stage.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    21. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by dfung · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hilarious!

      My favorite "pointless thing that you notice" in the original Star Wars was when Obi-wan tells Luke after the jawa vehicle attack "These blast points are too accurate for anyone but Imperial stormtroopers." Those troopers basically didn't hit anything they were aiming at for the next 2 movies/6 years!

      I too have the laserdisc versions both of the original commercial release and the remastered edition. Lucase wants our money. How long can it be before the "super-original" version comes out where the scrolling text starts with "Star Wars" instead of "Episode IV:A New Hope"? Now that would be something!

    22. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Or... 3. had held off on buying the original trilogy until such a version was released.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    23. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I disagree. It changed Han Solo quite a bit as a character to shoot first vs be shot at and react. Plus the CGI arm they inserted looks obvious and stupid to me.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    24. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if they're bragging that they have WMD to the whole world. idiot

    25. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      ... but now you've got to debate ... do you wait some more for the hd-dvd/blu-ray edition?

    26. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "How long can it be before the "super-original" version comes out where the scrolling text starts with "Star Wars" instead of "Episode IV:A New Hope"? Now that would be something!"

      Well, the article said it would be 'the original theatrical versions'...if that were the case, then the scrolling text 'should' be the original one?

      You're right..that really would be kind of cool....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    27. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely correct and very insightful.

    28. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by jafac · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I've had this argument with both my 18 year old son, and my 12 year old son.

      All I know is: I can FINALLY show the original to them, and they will FINALLY agree that I'm right - Han Shot First - and that's the way it *should* be. It's the natural order of things.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    29. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      It's pretty pathetic that Lucas doesn't understand the characters he allegedly created.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    30. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For a lot of people, Han Solo made Star Wars. I really don't care about the Jedi, good vs. evil, all that rehashed crap... the cool part is a cocky, badass smuggler with a cobbled-together tin can of a spaceship living on the frontier. Han's the only remotely interesting character in all six films aside from Obi-Wan, Lando, and a couple of minor players.

      As a similar change, what if we edited it so that in the Emperor's room at the very end, Vader attacks first instead of Luke striking out in anger. That sorta changes the mood of the whole scene and Luke's entire character. Same thing with Han allowing Greedo to get a shot off at point blank range, and also Greedo somehow missing from two feet away.

    31. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Dick Cheney is actually more like Darth Sidious. Except he picked Jar Jar for his apprentice.

    32. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      You haven't seen Cheney without his mask?

    33. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by solive1 · · Score: 1

      Don't give Lucas any ideas... before you know it we'll have IV - VI "Super Special" Edition with Jar Jar thrown in.

    34. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Uncle+Rummy · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the next version will be the original theatrical release with Dolby 5.1 / DTS enhanced sound. Then, he'll release the full digitally remastered versions with the plot edits stripped out. That'll keep the pipeline full for the next 5 years or so.

    35. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      In the 2004 version, Han and Greedo shoot each other at once: Greedo doesn't shoot first. It was the nineties version where Greedo shot first. Had the 90s version not come out, I don't think the change would have been seen as significant.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    36. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Having read a second person think I'm suggesting there's no difference between Han shooting first and Greedo shooting first, I reread my comment. Other than a complete, and deliberate, decision to ignore what I wrote, possibly in the belief that there are no changes between the nineties version and 2004 version, I cannot fathom how anyone would think:
      The Han and Greedo shoot each other simultaneously is, really, nothing. It doesn't matter. It would never have been an issue, nor changed anyone's view of Han as a character, had it been that way in 1977.
      can be characterised as refering to a change where Han can "be shot at and react". In the 2004 version, they shoot simultaneously. While one can complain "That's not how it was originally", there is nothing about that scene that fundamentally changes Han's character from the original in 1977.
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    37. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by B_Realll · · Score: 1

      I agree that the change wouldn't have been as significant. However, the 2004 version is still an insult. Instead of making amends for his colossal lack of judgement, Lucas negotiated by changing the timing. This scene, as well as the Jabba scene are two of the worst examples of CG to ever grace the screen. It is salt in the wound to leave this crap in there. As they say, a teaspoon of sewage in a barrel of soup gives you a barrel of sewage.

      --
      now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb.
    38. re: in response to overwhelming demand ... by ed.han · · Score: 1

      but what do i know, i'm just an engineer, not cinematic master.

      c'mon, if he released these earlier, you know we wouldn't all be thinking:

      [waves hand]

      "this is not the cinematic master you're looking for."

      ed

    39. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by obender · · Score: 2, Funny
      What about Yoda? Whatever happens to him?

      Details here

    40. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Anonymous+Coward+Gra · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Also Jabba comes off as a bit of a wuss and not the badass he was in Return of the Jedi.

    41. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      the cool part is a cocky, badass smuggler with a cobbled-together tin can of a spaceship living on the frontier.

      Hence, the success of Firefly.

      Joss Whedon is my master now.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    42. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Hell no. I couldn't care less about HD-DVD or Blu-ray, or any other standards bodies who can't be fucked working out a deal to ensure cross-compatibility.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    43. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Han and Greedo shoot each other simultaneously is, really, nothing.

      Wrong. In the real world, he who shoots first lives, he who throws the first punch wins the fight. Han needs to know this, see the problem coming, and solve it by shooting first. Else, he's not Han, he's just a dumb smuggler.

      Having Han react is like having Ender not kill people.

    44. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to point out that I'm not the creator of this animation. It's copyrighted by b3ta.com. Thanks.

  3. DVD by gentimjs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Didnt george lucas come out years back with some rhetoric about how DVD was tehsux and lucasfilm would only pump out VCDs or some shit like that? .. yeah .. good plan ..

    1. Re:DVD by Gord · · Score: 5, Informative

      Didn't he also say something along the lines of 'The only version that exists now is the version in my head and that's the special edition remakes' and that original versions would never be re-released?

    2. Re:DVD by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Sometimes we all get underwhelmed by technology, whether it be 640kb of memory, or things closer to home:

      Apple releases iPod
      Posted by CmdrTaco on 18:20 23rd October, 2001
      from the well-thats-not-very-exciting dept.
      The BrownFury writes "At an invitation only event Apple has released their new MP3 player called the iPod. iPod is the size of a deck of cards. 2.4" wide by 4" tall by .78" thick 6.5 ounces. 5 GB HDD, 10 hr battery life, charged via FireWire. Works as a firewire drive as well. Works in conjunctions with iTunes 2. Here are Live updates". No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

      Now, I wonder if taco has changed his views since?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:DVD by Tekzel · · Score: 1

      Not sure about him, but I still think the iPod is lame. Granted, the major reason is it is so trendy, but nevermind. Of course having to use itunes to deal with it is big reason #2. I recently (I guess a couple of months ago now)bought a Creative Zen Vision:M instead, and have never looked back. Love my Zen.

    4. Re:DVD by Silmeria · · Score: 0, Interesting

      That was laserdisc and he was a big backer of it. Coincidentally, before this decision by Lucasarts to release classic star wars on DVD the best version of that release you could get was on Laserdisc. Owners of the laserdisc version aren't gonna be happy with this news as the resale prices are gonna drop like a stone.

    5. Re:DVD by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I think he said that the special editions weren't going to be made available on video as well.

    6. Re:DVD by koweja · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps, he still thinks the original iPod was lame, but likes the newer ones. It's not like it isn't a bit different now that it was 5 years ago.

    7. Re:DVD by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


      He did say that, but then his pizza budget hit an all-time high so he decided to milk this withered udder one more time. Until the release on BluRay and HD-DVD are available, that is.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    8. Re:DVD by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      But he was right about this one ;=)

    9. Re:DVD by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      I agree, never really liked the iPod the only thing it's got going for it is it's interface (hey, Apple is just good at UI). Past that I find the over dependence on iTunes a burden more then a blessing, no replaceable battery, and outside of music it doesn't do anything particularly well.

      Just because something is trendy or popular doesn't mean it's not LAME. I think teenage girls who carry around small dogs is LAME despite that fact that it is popular and trendy.

    10. Re:DVD by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the fact its on laserdisk will maintain the price.

      Its like holding onto old wax recordings, the disks themselves are a piece of history - its a bonus that theres movies on them.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    11. Re:DVD by IcarusMoth · · Score: 1

      I still agree with him, I bought a Nomad Jukebox, in march '01, and damn it if I'm not still happy with it. The interface upgrades, playlists on the fly, upgradable hard drive, removeable batteries, barring being dropped into an ocean or run over by a city bus, this machine could last forever. Nomad > iPod

    12. Re:DVD by j_snare · · Score: 1

      Yes, but notice "Lucasfilm Ltd. and Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment will release".

      Lucas complained that he wasn't going to put the millions in, but Fox determined that if you put a few millions in, you can get quite a few more millions back on this one. So then Fox sends Greedo over, and Lucas knows what a twitchy finger Greedo has... And Lucas doesn't want to have to repaint...

    13. Re:DVD by zuzzabuzz · · Score: 1

      Aren't laser discs better fidelity? I haven't seen one in a long time, but they were pretty large (like an LP). I don't know what clever compression techniques were in use back then, but it surely wasn't mpeg2.

      DVDs are okay, but the mpeg encoding can sure leave a lot of artifacts when the color range is not wide (skies, darkness, fog).

      --
      -buzz
    14. Re:DVD by zonker · · Score: 0

      laserdiscs have analog video and at first only uncompressed pcm audio. however dolby digital and dts became available on laserdisc later on. there is evidence that a properly mastered laserdisc played on a high quality laserdisc player will have superior sound to a properly mastered dvd played on a high quality dvd player (dvd dts audio being close to but still not as good as the pcm, laserdisc dd or dts).

      the picture quality though suffers greatly on laserdisc due to limited resolution and the analog video among other factors.

      btw, laserdisc doesn't support anamorphic video, the best it can do is fullscreen or letterbox which limits the overall video quality as it lacks the resolution of a true anamorphic source.

      here's some info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laserdisc

    15. Re:DVD by posterlogo · · Score: 1

      I think that's what he wanted to say. Man, someone with such disdain for fans should not be supported. Therefore I will only buy Indiana Jones trilogy and Star Wars (ORIGINAL) trilogy DVDs. And nothing else by him. Yeah.

    16. Re:DVD by Rude-Boy · · Score: 1

      "...and outside of music it doesn't do anything particularly well. "

      Tell me about it, the job it did washing my car sucked!

    17. Re:DVD by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Laserdiscs are uncompressed. You get a nice SD analog signal. dvds look much sharper to me, plus you don't have to flip them after 50 minutes.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    18. Re:DVD by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Aren't laser discs better fidelity? I haven't seen one in a long time, but they were pretty large (like an LP). I don't know what clever compression techniques were in use back then, but it surely wasn't mpeg2.

      Wikipedia says LaserDisc used analog video: "[W]ith a Laserdisc, the pits and lands are created using frequency modulation of an analog signal, with the frequency carrier encoded using pulse-width modulation." It goes on to say that they could store either analog audio or digital audio in various formats, but video appears to have been analog only.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    19. Re:DVD by admdrew · · Score: 1

      It also functions horribly as a baseball. They handle poorly when hit with a bat.

      Sidenote: your friends will be slightly unhappy if you borrow their iPod then bring it back in multiple (unworking) pieces.

    20. Re:DVD by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Do they make a 60GB Vision:M yet?

    21. Re:DVD by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      The interface upgrades, playlists on the fly

      iPod does both of these things. However, it is far more fragile than a Nomad Jukebox. Smaller, too, however.

    22. Re:DVD by DesireCampbell · · Score: 2, Informative

      He also once said films don't need special visual effects to be ood - and that they distracted the audience from the story.

      Of course he was talking about colour - but he changed his view real quick.

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    23. Re:DVD by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      LD is commonly held to have higher quality than DVD, and I agree wholeheartedly. No compression means no compression artifacting. The audio can be analog, PCM, or AC3, so the audio is just as good as DVD, barring DTS.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:DVD by Lobo42 · · Score: 1

      Ooooh, and those cute lil' Artoo-Detto M&M Figurines, but only because they're candy related. And maybe a book, but only the Timothy Zahn ones, because that's kinda like not supporting Lucas. And the THX-1138 DVD because, c'mon, that's a CLASSIC. But that's it! I draw the line right there! No more supporting Lucas!

    25. Re:DVD by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Thanks, I learned something. Never knew they could have AC3.

      I miss my LD player, although I sold it at the right time. Right before the local laserdiscery went belly-up. Netflix would be $100/month if they had to ship those monoliths.

      I actually had both DVD and LD hooked up to the same TV for a while. DVD looked sharper to me, LD had smoother motion and better gradients. My only serious complaint about LD was disc flipping and the occasional 3 or 4 sided movie.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    26. Re:DVD by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, there is such a thing as a LD player that plays 2 discs, 2 sides. I just have one that plays 1 disc, 2 sides, so I only have to "flip" when a movie is more than 1 disc. I've also seen a player that was 1 disc 2 sides, PLUS it was a CD/DVD carousel player, but it was like a thousand bucks and it was well into the modern age. My LD player cost someone a thousand dollars long long ago, but I got it for $35 at the Santa Cruz flea market. It had an Audioslave CD in it too, so I got an extra good deal :) (It's an old panasonic with optical digital audio out and one of those badass remotes with a jog wheel on it.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:DVD by Urchlay · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > Therefore I will only buy ... Star Wars (ORIGINAL) trilogy DVDs.

      I bought mine a year ago. Bootleg? Yes. But I had been waiting for a long time, and Lucas sounded like he meant it... so I don't feel bad about paying for a bootleg DVD (transferred from the laserdisc edition, very nice quality).

      How many times will I pay for the same movie? Let's see...

      1. Half-price kids' tickets to all 3 movies when I was a kid
      2. Bought original trilogy on VHS (pre-special edition). The tapes wore out from repeated viewing over the years.
      3. Full-price adult tickets to all 3 movies when they were re-released in the 1990s. Saw each movie at least twice, except Jedi (sorry, I hate Ewoks).
      4. Bought special edition trilogy on VHS (actually, this was a gift for someone else)

      So I've already paid for these movies approximately 4 times each. I don't feel the least bit bad about owning a bootleg, at this point.

    28. Re:DVD by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      So then Fox sends Greedo over, and Lucas knows what a twitchy finger Greedo has... And Lucas doesn't want to have to repaint...

      Then what happened? Lucas shot first?

    29. Re:DVD by Thorkytel+Ant-Head · · Score: 1

      You know what? Why don't you all take off your cynical hats for one day and just be happy. I, along with millions of other Star Wars fans, have wanted the original theatrical versions to be available on DVD for quite some time now, and for years people have given Lucas crap about not releasing them. And now, when he finally decides to release them...people like you are giving him crap about it. Please, just stop. I'm happy, and I'm willing to give Lucas credit for doing the right thing in this case. So please, everyone, just be happy for one day, okay? Thanks.

    30. Re:DVD by Thorkytel+Ant-Head · · Score: 1

      In fact, laserdiscs do have artifacting. True, they are not MPEG-2 compressed, so they do not have MPEG-2 compression artifacts. However, they are NTSC, and therefore suffer from the artifacts inherent to the format, such as limited resolution in the blue colorspace, having the signals for chroma and luminance mixed together, and so on. DVDs are not NTSC, and therefore do not suffer from those NTSC artifacts.

    31. Re:DVD by funfail · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm unhappy with the release, but the whining is because he already knew that he'd release them on DVD when he said he wouldn't. If he had actually meant not to release DVDs and then seen the right thing, nobody would complain.

    32. Re:DVD by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      iPod does both of these things. However, it is far more fragile than a Nomad Jukebox.

      How so. Both my 4th gen and my Mini have survived a dozen drops to concrete from my clumbsy ass. The Nano's have survived being run over by cars and dropped out car windows at 55 mph. iPod's are far from fragile.

    33. Re:DVD by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      iPod does both of these things

      The new ones do. I bought my iPod in 2003 (i.e. 2 years after the GP bought their Nomad), and although it has some firmware upgrades, it doesn't do the on-the-fly playlists thing.

      Which is not to say I don't like the iPod. I've never used a Nomad, but the odds are that I won't like the UI, etc. Mainly because I haven't liked the UI on any other mp3 player I've ever tried. Plus, it's a Creative product, and they wouldn't know good UI design if you shoved their hideously bloated 70Mb sound driver downloads up their ass.

    34. Re:DVD by Thorkytel+Ant-Head · · Score: 1

      How do you know what he originally meant? So you know exactly what he was thinking years ago when he said he would never release the original versions.

      Nice try. You don't know what he was thinking then, and neither does anyone else. He's been saying for years that the new versions were the only versions he would release, so it seems likely that this is, as he said, a response to the demand from fans. Maybe he had a change of heart; I don't know. But in this case, I'm willing to give him credit for doing the right thing.

      But go ahead and feel free to be cynical, and get mad at Lucas because of what you have telepathically deduced about his intentions.

    35. Re:DVD by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Just a minor point. LucasArts is the videogame arm of the company and LucasFilm is the movie arm.

    36. Re:DVD by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      ...and my iPod has dozens of scratches from the one week i didn't have a 3rd-party case yet, even though i was using the included slipcover.

      sorry man, i like my iPod but it isn't as sturdy as the Nomad jukebox. Especially not that old discman-sized one, which i believe is the one the GP poster was talking about. that thing is a tank. of course, have fun slipping it in your pocket, but that's the trade-off.

    37. Re:DVD by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      And you might have a point if Nomad's couldn't be scratched. However, they can, so you don't.

    38. Re:DVD by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Anything CAN be scratched (well, almost anything). What matters is how easy it is. The coating of a Nomad is way tougher than that of an iPod - perhaps not an iPod Mini, however, those seem to be the toughest iPods in terms of scratches or impact damage.

      Have you ever owned or even held a Nomad? Especially one of those first gen ones? They are so huge, there is so much plastic and metal between the drive and any dangers... those things are indestructable. Seriously, they are literally the size of a large discman.

      That said, I have an iPod, not a Nomad, so it's not like I'm campaigning for the Nomad, which I don't think they even make anymore, so it's a moot point anyway.

  4. What is it now? by secondsun · · Score: 4, Funny

    So wouldn't this be the re-re-re-re-re-rerelease?

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
    1. Re:What is it now? by The+Walking+Dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Next will be the Blu-ray/HD-DVD releases. Then it will be the Star Wars 3D releases. I lucked out on episodes 4, 5, and 6 - I bought all three of them on DVD in China for $3.

      This reminds me of Game Boy. As soon as I buy one, they come out with a new one, or make a slight improvement. Just bought a DS? Here comes the DS Lite on June 11th. I feel like a sucker, but I buy them anyway. Marketing schemes suck, but high quality entertainment makes it acceptable. Hopefully I'm in China in 2030 so I can get a deal on the Holographic Edition of Star Wars episodes 7, 8, and 9.

    2. Re:What is it now? by LupusCanis · · Score: 1

      You know, you don't have to always get the new version... There's no reason why you need to get Star Wars for the (presumably third) time on HD-DVD or Blu-ray, when they come out on there, at the end of the day, they're the same set of movies, and why would you want to buy it again twice, even if it is in higher definition? I'm sure as hell not upgrading to HD-DVD for all my DVDs! I'm hoping that HD-DVD/Blu-ray adoption is slow actually, I don't think that we need the exodus to a new format that we had from VHS to DVD again, the improvements simply aren't as dramatic. Then again, some people actually bought UMDs so, I suppose that people will buy the same product any number of times... Incidentally, the same applies with the DS, though the DS Lite is cool, anyone who already has a DS who buys it is a tool.

  5. If only by Oldsmobile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If only they could now release episodes one through three with remastered versions that don't feature lousy acting, shallow characters and crappy plots.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    1. Re:If only by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sorry, computer tech and digital art ain't THAT good yet.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:If only by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If only they could now release episodes one through three with remastered versions that don't feature lousy acting, shallow characters and crappy plots.

      Episode 3 was actually pretty good. It had plenty of action, but enough slow parts that tied the story together and developed the characters. It was dark and evil, definitely had a consistent and welcome theme throughout. I don't know which of the 6 movies is the best, but Episode 3 is a strong contender in my mind.

      Episodes 1 and 2 left a lot to be desired, but thanks to the fast forward function of my DVD player, really aren't all that bad. No more frolicking in the meadow, no more talk of midichlorians, etc.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    3. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You want a dvd of credit sequences?

    4. Re:If only by cultrhetor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One could say the same thing about the "classic" trilogy. You were just younger and less discerning when it came out. George Lucas writes the world's worst dialogue. The movies were all meant to be comic-book style fantasies: not shakespeare.

      --
      "Tu fui, ego eris" - Virgil
    5. Re:If only by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yes... But first they'll have to do that for the other three films.

    6. Re:If only by halivar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but at least they didn't have Bea Arthur as a singing cantina owner. Some things do improve with time. That said, I definitely think Harvey Corman could have played a good Sith.

    7. Re:If only by koweja · · Score: 1

      The only problems with Ep 3 were that it took all of three seconds for him to turn to the dark side and the fact that none of the Jedi (save Yoda) seem to have sense a galatic conspiracy against them. Aside from that I found the movie to be entertaining enough, though it still lacked the epic feel of the first three.

      Ep 2 was okay, not great but watchable. I still can't bring myself to watch Ep. 1 anymore, and not just because of Jar-Jar (enough shows and movies have dumb characters that I'm used to it) or the half hour pod race (FF FTW). Something about little kids being heroes in an adult world like that annoys me. Seems too Home Alone-ish to me.

    8. Re:If only by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sure, the dialogue in EP4-6 was terrible, but at least you cared about the characters and what happened to them. At least they were exciting.

      EP1&2 (not seen 3) are CGI-fests with badly written stories about characters that you cannot form any interest with.

      If people were just forgiving of films because they were kids, we'd have sp.editions of Battle Beyond the Stars and The Black Hole.

    9. Re:If only by mobiux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly!!!!!
      It's the kids that ruin sequels.
      Look at The Mummy. I really liked the first one.
      So i decided to take the family to the 2nd. That god damn kid ruined the entire thing.
      Hollywood thinks that if a movie does well, making a sequel and putting an obnoxious 9 year old to bring in the kid audience must make everything even better.

      Lucas was one of the first to try this, with those god-damn Ewoks.
      He just perfected it with Ep.1

      I am waiting for a Fight Club 2 with kids beating up each other and a pg-13 rating to finally bring about the apocalypse .

    10. Re:If only by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Kid killed it for me too. If they cast the same role as a sarcastic 14 year old, it would all have been okay. All the stupid things he says, delivered with withering sarcasm, would have been cool.

      And frankly, even a 8 year old, or whatever he's supposed to be, would be hard pressed to deliver lines like "Ooops" and "Yippee!" with anything other than sarcasm in mind.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    11. Re:If only by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1
      Let's not forget "Space Raiders" which even recycled footage from Battle Beyond the Stars.

      P.S. less of the Black Hole bashing please ;-) Yes, the robots were a bit cheesy (except maximillian) but the rest of it was a genuinely well-executed moody sci-fi thriller, with a brilliant cast.

      And totally off on a tangent, what is with everyone thinking TRON is shit? It's totally unique in concept and execution, again with a brilliant cast, exquisite visuals, ok some of the computer metaphors are kind of clunky but eliminating that, its a stone cold classic and a landmark in cinema history.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    12. Re:If only by grasshoppa · · Score: 2

      Episode 3 was actually pretty good.

      In what sense? Piss poor acting. Not just from Hayden ( who seems to operate in that mode ), but from everyone. Even my man Jackson. Shallow story, poor execution of what little plot they had. Cheesy Darth Vader scene, characters breaking from the mold they set in the previous two films.

      I'll give you an example of that last one; Pademe losing her will to live? Here is a strong woman who has an almost limitless well of compassion in her ( think about her comments about being a part of the government for her people ), who is having two babies. And because her husband tries to kill her, she loses her will to live.

      Bullshit.

      I won't even go into how she changed from a strong character to a whiny housewife between 2 and 3.

      The only thing 3 had going for it was Force and saber fights, but even in that #1 has it beat.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    13. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think acting == dialogue, then you obviously have a very poor understanding of film. And if you thinkg the ACTING of the prequels compares with the original Star Wars, then you're just an idiot.

    14. Re:If only by neuromancer2701 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you check out IMDB, Lucas just came up with the Story, which he is good at, for V and VI. I think IV is the weakest of the orginal three but it was so revolutionary that people look past the flaws. V and VI were directed and Written(screeplay) by different people that did not happen with I,II,III. Lucas is just terrible at writing dialog. V and VI maybe a little cheese but Han is just so funny. The story and dialog was just all messed up in I,II,III that I think I liked the Matrix Trilogy better, but that is just me. Way to much CGI, Matrix and LotR trilogies did a better job of combining CGI with real sets, How do you interact with something that is not there or when you are just talking to someone in front of Green screen and have no context/environment to act in.

      Matrix > III best vs best
      Reloaded > II
      Revolutions == I worst vs worst
      Advantage
      Keanu

      Han Solo: Hey, Your Worship, I'm only trying to help.
      Princess Leia: Would you please stop calling me that?
      Han Solo: Sure, Leia.
      Princess Leia: Oh, you make it so difficult sometimes.
      Han Solo: I do, I really do. You could be a little nicer, though. Come on, admit it. Sometimes you think I'm all right.
      Princess Leia: Occasionally maybe... when you aren't acting like a scoundrel.
      Han Solo: [laughs] Scoundrel? Scoundrel? I like the sound of that.
      [Han takes her hand and starts to massage it]

      --
      "If you like Battlestar Galactica, you're probably a huge nerd." -Stephen Colbert
    15. Re:If only by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Personally, I think that Tron is shit. As a concept, it's a great idea, technically groundbreaking, but it's poorly executed. It needed more work on the script, and perhaps needed to be a bit darker. In a better Disney period, it could have been a lot better.

      Disney could remake it as a great movie. They've got the rights. They've just got some great people on scripts and computers.

    16. Re:If only by Ansonmont · · Score: 1

      goes the child wookie's toy under the heel of the Storm Trooper...

    17. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you thinkg the ACTING of the prequels compares with the original Star Wars, then you're just an idiot.

      He/she never said that though, so spare your insults...

    18. Re:If only by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      EP IV is a regular action film, not a million miles away from old entertainment starring Errol Flynn.

      But, it's a really well executed action film, and completely gripping from the moment that the imperial star destroyer appears on the screen. But underlying the fact that it looked like nothing else before is that you watch it and get interested in the story.

      Toy Story, The Matrix and Star Wars are nothing without the story. The technology, in all cases created a visual impact, but they also had strong stories.

    19. Re:If only by thebdj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You obviously have no kids. Women get pretty moody while pregnant and can change lots. But further into that degree, it wasn't Anakin/Vader trying to kill her that caused her to lose the will to live, it was his turn to the dark side and the vicious creature he turned into because he wanted to "save her." She realized the monster he had become and this is why she lost her will to live. It goes much, much deeper then you are even putting into it.

      As for acting, has it ever been that good throughout any of the SW movies? The actors in the original trilogy mostly fell into obscurity. The only one who had much of a career post SW was Harrison Ford. They actually used more established actors in the new trilogy, but you still had a lot of poor acting, which I would attribute more to poor direction then I would to poor actors.

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    20. Re:If only by vitamins · · Score: 1

      I've had this argument with a fellow Star Wars fanatic who feels that once Anakin turned the Dark Side controlled him completely. While that maybe in keeping with the Jedi way of thinking it really doesn't make sense to anyone who isn't a religious zealot.
      br>The plot I envisioned watching the preview was Anakin turning on Obi Wan first, since they had so much history together and a precedent for icy exchanges, then getting tossed in the lava which would make anyone snap. It also ties in a lot better with Obi Wan blaming himself, Vader blaming him, etc. That is the only way I could see someone going from good to bad like that.

    21. Re:If only by thebdj · · Score: 1

      Actually since early 2005 (I think), there has been talk of Disney doing a Tron remake.

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    22. Re:If only by finkployd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But further into that degree, it wasn't Anakin/Vader trying to kill her that caused her to lose the will to live, it was his turn to the dark side and the vicious creature he turned into because he wanted to "save her." She realized the monster he had become and this is why she lost her will to live. It goes much, much deeper then you are even putting into it.

      Oh no it doesn't, it is a lame plot no matter how much anyone tries to rationalize it.

      Anakin is driven to the dark side by a desire to save her (from a bad dream he had for that matter), then he almost kills her. Real believable. Then he wakes up as Vader and is all concerned about her again.

      Also Padme was portrayed as a strong woman in the first two. If you think any mother (let alone a strong, independent one) is going to just lose her will to live and abandon her kids because her husband turnes into a bad guy then YOU obviously don't have kids. Alternatively, Padme is a complete and total spinless wuss and it was actually her decoy who was all brave, strong, and acting as her in all scenes in the movies one and two.

      Finkployd

    23. Re:If only by Eccles · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you heard someone quote from 1-3?

      Now, when's the last time you heard someone quote from 4-6? "I find your lack of faith disturbing," for example, comes in handy many times.

      The originals may have had cheesy dialog, but it was fun, playful dialog. The only time I can remember the prequel achieving anything like the same effect is "We came to rescue you." "Good job." in Ep 2.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    24. Re:If only by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      George Lucas writes terrible dialogue, but he was very fortunate to get actors (and directors) who were capable of working around that.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    25. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how is a pod-racer who's never even finished a race, "An accomplished pilot". Obiwan told Luke Anakin was an accomplished pilot before they met.

    26. Re:If only by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      People keep saying that, but I dunno... I've had people who never saw the originals watch all 6 and they say that the original 3 had more of a sense of fun, made more sense, and were generally better movies.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    27. Re:If only by thebdj · · Score: 1

      From a bad dream? Did you miss this whole Jedi have visions thing? I mean throughout Ep II they talk about his "nightmares" about his mother and guess what she was suffering and in pain and eventually died. The same thing winds up happenening to Padme. You see he lost his mother and was hell bent on trying to save her. He tries to kill her because he thought she betrayed him by bringing Obi Wan there. He had let his anger consume him, and this anger is what drove him to react in such a manner.

      There is more to it then just Anakin turning into a bad guy. Seriously, he goes from Jedi to slaughtering children. He goes from loving Padme to trying to kill her. Eventhough they use the expression, "lost the will to live", it doesn't mean she is simply weak. She was nearly killed by Anakin before he stopped. There is a lot more to it then some of you are thinking. Also, you pretty much know she has to die when the trilogy starts. I need only point you to the original trilogy for lines that lead you to that conclusion.

      Finally, I really wish people would stop bashing these movies because it is the "hip thing" to do. I mean all I see is the same two or three reasons re-hashed over and over. The thoughts aren't even well worked out usually. I mean I know this movies aren't artistic masterpieces, but putting together an argument against it takes at least some effort.

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    28. Re:If only by Rydia · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because angry, ambitious people NEVER hurt people that are close to them. They certainly never fly into a fit of rage at an apparnent betrayal and try to hurt them. I mean, you'd think that they'd come up with something like "in the heat of passion" categorizations for violent crimes if people did THAT.

      That's why DAs offices never have ridiculously overburdened domestic violence divisions.

    29. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People bash the movies because they were bad. There isn't a fan club they all have membership to. The only perplexing thing is that they ever thought the original movies were good. Other than for the visual and special effects of the time, they had nothing going for them. The acting was bad, the story was a mentally retarded bastardization of Dune, and if pubescent males weren't so drawn to phallic weapons and spaceships we wouldn't even be having this discussion. The problem you really have is that you're an overzealous wanker. Maybe you've seen that in one of your visions.

    30. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now come on. How can you top dialogue like:

          Around the prisoners, a perimeter, create!

      You just can't make shit like that up.

    31. Re:If only by bsane · · Score: 2

      How about:

      "Hold me like you did by the lake on Naboo."

      That's a timeless classic that I've heard quoted a lot.

      Of course its a joke about how crappy the move was... the audience even laughed when she said it.

    32. Re:If only by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      And totally off on a tangent, what is with everyone thinking TRON is shit?
      i liked it, but i still want to know what the hell was the point of the gridbugs
    33. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ep 3 had lots of problems. The ones that get me were the gratuitous inclusion of Chewbaca, and Yoda bouncing around with a light-saber.

    34. Re:If only by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      The only one who had much of a career post SW was Harrison Ford.
      Alec Guinness only because he was at the end of a career, and Carrie Fischer had a good bit of career trouble due to alcohol/drug problems
    35. Re:If only by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      From a bad dream? Did you miss this whole Jedi have visions thing?

      You just gave me an idea. What if in reediting Episodes 1 and 2 you not only trim the pod race and cut out Jar-Jar and the midichloroform and insert second-long flashes forward from Episode 3 as visions little Annie has. That could kick up the tension a bit and defuse the "cute kid" movie ruination.

      Prime times would be scenes where you might go "Awww" to suddenly change it to "Aaaah!"

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    36. Re:If only by Goo.cc · · Score: 2

      I don't think it was just the dialog that was the problem, especially with EP1. Personally, my problems with EP1 are three things:

      1. Anakin is too young
      2. Jar Jar
      3. Midochlorians ('nuff said)

      Number one is a big deal for me. I think Lucas should have made Anakin about the same age as Luke was when we first see him in EP3 (for allegorical reasons if nothing else). Not only would the pod racing scene have been more believable, Lucas could have introduced a sexual attraction between Anakin and Padme which also would have made their getting together in EP2 more believable.

      I didn't have much of a problem with Jar Jar existing but his character really doesn't have a purpose off of Naboo.

    37. Re:If only by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

      And featuring Don Knots as the wacky Jedi Temple landlord, Mar So So McFurley.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    38. Re:If only by Mr+Pippin · · Score: 1

      And Tim Conway would have made a great droid. Hey, Lyle Wagner would have made a great Jedi, too!
      I think we've already been down this line of casting with "Space Balls".
      Then again, that wasn't that great, either. It seems all of Mel Brooks greatest films were all films he started out NOT wanting to do.

    39. Re:If only by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I quite often quote 'Well, from my perspective you're evil' (often substituting evil for something more relevant). Dialogue like that need repeating so people remember it if they are considering letting Lucas near a script in the future.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    40. Re:If only by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "...Carrie Fischer had a good bit of career trouble due to alcohol/drug problems..."

      And let's face it...she did NOT age very well at all....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    41. Re:If only by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      Yeah i thought that, also they kind of look like drawings rather than CGI.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    42. Re:If only by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Shh! No pointing out the gaping plot holes!

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    43. Re:If only by 3nd32 · · Score: 1

      NOOOOOOOOO!!!

      </darth>

    44. Re:If only by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Number one is a big deal for me. I think Lucas should have made Anakin about the same age as Luke was when we first see him in EP3 (for allegorical reasons if nothing else).

      But, if Anakin had been older, he'd propably done the same thing as Luke did, namely, ran save his mother as soon as he felt she was in trouble, thus preventing her from dying and keeping himself from getting obsessed about the matter, thus keeping him from falling to the Dark Side.

      If Anakin had been older before being indoctrinated as a Jedi, he'd been able to use his common sense, which would had kept the Empire from being born in the first place. And you can't have people acting rationally, that would remove all the drama.

      Not only would the pod racing scene have been more believable, Lucas could have introduced a sexual attraction between Anakin and Padme which also would have made their getting together in EP2 more believable.

      To be fair, one is a senator too busy trying not to get murdered to date, and the other is Jedi forbidden to have any attachments to anyone; of course they are going to take the bait the first chance they get, and of course it is going to be very awkward.

      Midichlorians were a bad idea, but kinda understandable; they needed some way to show that Anakin has more potential than anyone, and almost any kind of Force-measuring device would have been just as cheesy as midichlorians were.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    45. Re:If only by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      I didn't have much of a problem with Jar Jar existing but his character really doesn't have a purpose off of Naboo.

      Well he was the one that put palpatine in power by demanding a vote of no confidence on the previous guy in charge. Plus that makes it more fun (to me) that the annoying character (although I didn't think he was as bad as some people here make out) screws up royally and ends up being used and helps build the empire!

    46. Re:If only by deinol · · Score: 1

      Oh no it doesn't, it is a lame plot no matter how much anyone tries to rationalize it.

      And here I thought it was lame because of this:

      Leia: "Luke, what's wrong?"
      Luke Skywalker: "Leia, do you remember your mother, your REAL mother?"
      Leia: "Just a little bit. She died when I was very young."
      Luke Skywalker: "What do you remember?"
      Leia: "Just images, really. Feelings."
      Luke Skywalker: "Tell me."
      Leia: "She was very beautiful. Kind, but sad. Why are you asking me this?"
      Luke Skywalker: "I have no memory of my mother. I never knew her."

      --
      Got Apathy?
    47. Re:If only by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      I think #3 was the best of the prequels, but it still lacked the whole friendship theme that tied the original three together. No buddy-buddy stuff. No Han and Luke rushing in to save Leia, no Han and Lando, no Han and Leia bickering. Come to think of it, the trouble with the prequels is, no Han Solo.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    48. Re:If only by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      16K Ram Pack wrote

      Personally, I think that Tron is shit. As a concept, it's a great idea, technically groundbreaking, but it's poorly executed. It needed more work on the script, and perhaps needed to be a bit darker. In a better Disney period, it could have been a lot better.

      Disney could remake it as a great movie. They've got the rights. They've just got some great people on scripts and computers.

      I've always thought that TRON's problem is that it came out at a time before most people were familiar with computers. That prevented many viewers from getting some of the references in the movie.

      On the subject of remakes and sequels to TRON: A sequel has already been produced in the form of a video game, TRON 2.0 (it was originally to be called TRON - Killer Ap). It features the son of Alan Bradley (TRON's user in the movie) named Jet Bradley who is also pulled into the computer world.

      Also, in April 2006 a comic book was released by SLG named TRON. It is a continuation of both the movie and the video game and features a recap on the first page that briefly relates what happened in the movie, the video game, and what happened the characters before the comic book started. The first issue is quite good and it was written by Landry Walker and Eric Jones (both credited as Data Entry), and drawn by Louie De Martinis (credited as Pixels).

      Finally, another series that could be considered a continuation or companion to TRON is ReBoot. It is an excellent series that also takes place in a computer world. I see it as what TRON might have been like if it had been done in the 1990s. In fact, Bob in ReBoot comes across as a very TRON-like character.

    49. Re:If only by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      The only problems with Ep 3 were that it took all of three seconds for him to turn to the dark side

      Ummm, I know you probably weren't paying attention to eps 1 & 2, but Anakin had been falling to the darkside for much longer than that. Betraying Mace Windu was just the final straw. There was no turning back from that point. NEXT!

      ...and the fact that none of the Jedi (save Yoda) seem to have sense a galatic conspiracy against them

      Again, you weren't paying attention. In Eps 2 & 3, there were no less than five mentions of the Dark Side clouding the Jedi's ability to see through the force.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    50. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Padme moved for the vote of no confidence, and Jar Jar voted to give the chancellor Emergency Powers

    51. Re:If only by Kitsune818 · · Score: 1

      "And because her husband tries to kill her, she loses her will to live."

      I didn't see it that way at all. I saw her death as directly caused by Anakin, who was in such a blind rage (perhaps "controlled by the dark side" is a better way to put it) that he killed her for siding with the Jedi and didn't even realize it until the Emperor told him what he had done. Hence the "NooOoooooOooo!"

      I never saw her as week..

      What I found confusing is that later on Vader doesn't seem to know Leia is his daughter, yet he knows Luke is his son.

    52. Re:If only by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      hmm... OK so it's been a while since I watched them. They both helped make the empire then.

    53. Re:If only by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1

      Mark Hamil's on-screen career hasn't done too well, but he's got a great career going as a voice actor; he's damn good at it too. According to Wil Wheaton it's good, steady work once you get your foot in the door.

      --
      We apologize for the inconvenience.
    54. Re:If only by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      Midichlorians were a bad idea, but kinda understandable; they needed some way to show that Anakin has more potential than anyone, and almost any kind of Force-measuring device would have been just as cheesy as midichlorians were.

      They also fed into Palpatine's revelation en Ep3. Anakin was created by the midichlorians. Was this 'the will of the Force', or Sith manipulation? Or both?

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    55. Re:If only by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm noted.

      I'm specifically referring to a situation where someone was SO freaked out about the possibility of harm coming to someone that they would do everything, including drop, what like 10 years or so, of strict training, morals, everything and become what they have trained to fear most. Then after doing all that to ensure somoene's safety, try to kill them. You would think Jedi would have some kind of psych evaluation or something...

      Finkployd

    56. Re:If only by finkployd · · Score: 1

      the story was a mentally retarded bastardization of Dune

      Can you expand on that at all, because I just do not see it. I suppose you could make the argument that the force is very slightly similar to the weirding way (only the elevated fighting aspect of it) but that is a huge stretch. The only obvious similarities are that both involve a desert planet and space travel.

      Seems kind of insulting to Dune to indicate that Star Wars derived ANYTHING from it.

    57. Re:If only by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      Luke was being trained in the Force, and was actively using it, where Lea was not. Also, the fact that his first encounter with Vader was around the same time as Vader runs into Obi-wan again would have gotten him thinking about it. And, of course, Luke kept his surname.

      He knew of Lea as a pollitical figure, and suspected her of being a traitor, but I doubt that he spent any time questioning her parentage.

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    58. Re:If only by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      What I found confusing is that later on Vader doesn't seem to know Leia is his daughter, yet he knows Luke is his son.

      Simple enough explanation: At end of Ep. 3, he's told that Padme and the baby died because of him. He didn't know there were twins...apparently despite a pangalactic civilization and hyperadvanced technology, their obstetrics technology is in the dark ages.

      Also, it's Episode V (or between IV and V) that he learns that the pilot who destroyed the Death Star was named Luke Skywalker...I guess Obi-Wan was hoping Darth Vader would never make the connection........ ...whereas Leia's last name was Organa.

      Still, you'd think a "force-sensitive" would be able to know these sorts of things, especially about their own children.

      BAH. Enough over-analyzing Star Wars. Can't believe I've stooped to this! :P

    59. Re:If only by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Yep, we need a flashforward of the first viewing of Vader's black Vader outfit in thirty years to be heard saying "Noooooo!!!!" in Eps 1 and 2 also.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    60. Re:If only by Mr+Pippin · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, maybe they could have ONE more sequel.

      Anakin's mom is out doing the laundry when a flash of light appears, and a silvery vehicle appears and glides to the ground near her.
      Suddenly, the door of the vehicle opens upwards, and an old balding man with long hair leaps out wearing metalic glasses. He runs up to her and proceeds to tell her that a calamity of untold proportions will occur that only she can resolve.
      When asked just WHERE they are going, he exclaims "Back to the future!"
      "Why!", she questions? What have I done in the future?"
      "It's not YOU! It's YOUR KID! SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE ABOUT ANAKIN!!"

      [GROAN!]

    61. Re:If only by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Velorum is the name, I believe.

    62. Re:If only by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      Would anyone argue with Lord Vader even if he wasn't right? ;) Just look at that General guy who got choked (ok I suck at the names!)

    63. Re:If only by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1

      What annoyed me was the fact that Anakin became Darth Vader so quickly. I mean, it was like a quick extreme makeover.

      When I saw the first three films, I was under the impression that Vader took like ten or twenty years to s-l-o-w-l-y become eviller and eviller and in the process of evilzing lost a few limbs here and there and eventually had to get the breathign apparatus, perhaps going through several stages too.

      --
      Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    64. Re:If only by SEE · · Score: 1

      The analysis of the droid was that she lost her will to live, yes. Why are you taking that at face value? What does that droid know of the Force?

      Instead, think of Vader dying, drawing on the dark side of the Force to try to live. Think of Padme, still loving Anakin and selflessly hoping that he lives. Remember the ability of the Force to forge connections between people. Imagine Padme, knowing her children are safe with people she trusts, sacrificing her own life out of compassion to save her husband. Imagine Vader, hardened by the Dark Side, drawing on the life-force that's available in his anger at dying, without a care as to its source, in a twisted reversal of the legend of Darth Plaugeis.

      In short, imagine that Sidious told Vader the exact and literal truth -- "I'm afraid she died. ... it seems in your anger, you killed her."

    65. Re:If only by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget about James Earl Jones. He's done pretty well too.

      And I personally think Mark Hamill kicked ass as cockknocker in Jay and Silent Bob...

      Billy Dee Williams didn't do too bad after his role as Lando either...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    66. Re:If only by jefe7777 · · Score: 1

      Same with Scrappy Doo, he ruined everything.

      He needed a blanket party.

    67. Re:If only by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1
      That's a little cheesy, but it doesn't come within ten orders of magnitude of the sheer horror of everyone's favorite Episode III dialog:

      Anakin: "You're so beautiful."
      Padmé: "It's because I'm so in love."
      Anakin: "No. It's because I'm so in love with you."

      No movie containing that a conversation like that can ever be taken seriously.
      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    68. Re:If only by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that perhaps you might have a problem with children in general?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    69. Re:If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the lousy lighting? Half the scenes need a major gamma correction...

    70. Re:If only by jwlidtnet · · Score: 1

      He didn't know there were twins...apparently despite a pangalactic civilization and hyperadvanced technology, their obstetrics technology is in the dark ages.

      Oh, too true. I always found that to be kinda curious.

    71. Re:If only by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you think any mother (let alone a strong, independent one) is going to just lose her will to live and abandon her kids because her husband turnes into a bad guy then YOU obviously don't have kids.

      1. See "post-partum depression."
      2. Sometimes people just flip out and do wacky shit, like put their kids in the car and drive it into a lake.
      3. We are just animals. People tend to forget this. It's fairly common in the animal kingdom that some animals will kill and often even eat their young when conditions become too poor to support them. Not sure if this really applies to humans, but it probably does.
      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    72. Re:If only by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that he might have a point? Most child actors can't act, they're chosen because they're cute. Including that kid in Episode 1, who couldn't act his way out of a nutsack (with apologies to Stone and Parker.) Putting a kid in a sequel because you think you need a kid is no different from putting jar-jar binks in episode 1 because you think you need a moronic character that appeals (somehow) to children. Lucas thoughtfully did both in episode 1, of course...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    73. Re:If only by finkployd · · Score: 1

      You are right, there are expcetions for everything. That said, it was still really kinda strange/abnormal/unexpected/unexplained in the context of the movie.

      Finkployd

    74. Re:If only by Lobo42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, there are lots of "classic" lines that I quote:

      "Good call, my young Padawan!"

      "Around the survivors, a perimeter create!"

      "So uncivilized."

      "I saw him....KILLING YOUNGLINGS!"

      "They all sense it, why can't you?"

      "It's all Obi-Wan's fault!"

      In one sense, these are all jokes about the movies...but aren't you doing the same thing when you say "I find your lack of faith disturbing?"

    75. Re:If only by Anonymous+Coward+Gra · · Score: 1

      Agree completely about Padme. The whole giving up on life thing is just stupid and out of character.

    76. Re:If only by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 2

      That's pretty much been my stance on the whole "prequel" mess. Lucas was pretty good at a general "story", but when it came to writing, directing and producing he was just total ass.

      I don't think you can blame the terrible acting on the actors alone. I've seen most of them in other roles where they excelled. You can't blame the poor dialog delivery on the actors. It's all the director's fault. His job is to decide if the actors are performing as they should. It's his call whether or not a scene is finished. I personally think Lucas was too busy daydreaming about how many awesome special effects he would be adding to the scene later to worry about this silly "actors". The end result was a set of really crappy movies.

      I remember all the TV specials in the 80s about the miniatures, puppeteers and animatronics that Lucasfilm used to make the films. Those were fascinating. Nowadays all you get is some bullcrap about some warehouse filled with 5000 computers that spent 6 months rendering a movie with an impossible palette of colors. Booooooooooooooring. CGI is just too damned impersonal. Bring back the stunt men, makeup artists and elaborate sets. Burn your green screens.

    77. Re:If only by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

      The most pathetic part is that no one in the entire Jedi order thought to go back save this little boy's mother from slavery once they got to Coruscant. Guess Obi-wan forgot to make a note in his jedi palm pilot.

    78. Re:If only by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      The "chosen one of prophecy" has a vision that the love of his life will die giving birth to his children. He does what he can to prevent it. At some point, some evil dude offers to bring her back to life. He has a twin son and daughter, both of whom inherit his special abilities. But unfortunately the woman dies.

      That describes both Episode III and Dune Messiah.

      How about this... The son of the "chosen one" searches out his father. He manages to get his father to understand a better way. His father sacrifices himself helping his son. In the end a tyrant is killed.

      That's Return of the Jedi or Children of Dune.

      Now lets run down the list:
      Dune ~ Tattooine
      Lasguns ~ Blasters
      Gurney Halek ~ Han Solo
      Voice ~ Jedi mind trick
      Sardaukar ~ Storm Troopers
      Fremen ~ Sand People
      Leto II ~ Jabba
      Harvester ~ Sand Crawler
      Tleilaxu ~ Cloners
      Chrysknife ~ Light Saber
      Sarlac Pit ~ Sand Worm

      Pretty much everything from the Star Wars movies have an equivalent in the Dune books (except for robots, of course). Some things Lucas did make a lot cooler, ie. light sabers are cooler than chrysknives (although a knife made from the tooth of a sandworm is pretty cool too), the Jedi mind trick is cooler than the voice (although that may be because Alec Guiness delivered it so well), and Han Solo is cooler than Gurney Halek (but that may be because Harrison Ford is cooler than Patrick Stewart). But in all the other comparisons Dune wins.

      Also note that when they made the original Star Wars, Jabba was supposed to be a human, but was changed to his worm like appearance for RotJ. God Emperor of Dune was published in 1981. Maybe that was a coincidence.

    79. Re:If only by Mignon · · Score: 1
      The only time I can remember the prequel achieving anything like the same effect is "We came to rescue you." "Good job." in Ep 2.

      These aren't the quotes you're looking for.

    80. Re:If only by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      All of your quotes have padawan, or youngling, or yoda speak or the name of a character. If it weren't for that, I wouldn't know what movie they were from. Quotes from the original trilogy are great because they are recognisable without any clues and make great comebacks...

      "I'm not sure..." "I find your lack of faith disturbing"

      "that was lucky" "In my experience there's no such thing as luck"

      "the odds are..." "never tell me the odds"

    81. Re:If only by dcam · · Score: 1

      I tried the:

      Anakin: You are so... beautiful.
      Padmé: It's only because I'm so in love.
      Anakin: No, it's because I'm so in love with you.

      But my wife wouldn't play along. In fact she hit me.

      --
      meh
    82. Re:If only by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      drop, what like 10 years or so, of strict training, morals, everything

      "A Jedi's strength flows from the Force, but beware the Dark Side. For once you start down that dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will!"

      I had the impression that Anakin had gotten some Dark Side momentum going, so it made enough sense to me.

    83. Re:If only by Thorkytel+Ant-Head · · Score: 1

      Have you never been in love? Love makes you say some pretty cheesy things, and often you say them knowing that they are cheesy, because it's the only way you can express what you're feeling. Watch the scene again: The characters have this playful banter back and forth, and it's kind of a little game of seeing who can top the other one. It is intentionally cheesy, which is why is rings true.

      Of course, I suppose you might not realize that, since your RealDoll doesn't talk.

    84. Re:If only by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1
      "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" and "The Princess Bride" are among my favorite movies, so I'm certainly not opposed to sappy stuff. But that "Star Wars III" scene is absolutely the worst writing ever put on film, and I will not apologize for that opinion.

      Of course, I suppose you might not realize that, since your RealDoll doesn't talk.

      Hitting below the belt, are we? Fine, two can play at that game...

      Of course, I suppose you might think that banter like this is normal, having learned all your sweet talking from your mom.
      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    85. Re:If only by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      If only they could now release episodes one through three with remastered versions that don't feature lousy acting, shallow characters and crappy plots.

      Okay, but I'd settle for George Lucas' head on a silver platter, delivered to my door by singing telegram.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    86. Re:If only by Thorkytel+Ant-Head · · Score: 1

      Dune ~ Tattooine: both desert planets. Check. Lasguns ~ Blasters: I can't believe that Star Wars stole the idea of laser guns, which were of course invented by Frank Herbert. Gurney Halek ~ Han Solo: Remember how in Star Wars, Han Solo was a noble soldier who is fiercely loyal to the royal family, and how he never looks out for himself? Voice ~ Jedi mind trick: Frank Herbert also invented the concept of telepathy. Sardaukar ~ Storm Troopers: Yes, I can't imagine where Lucas would have gotten the idea of an army of ruthlessly-loyal soldiers called "storm troopers."Since there are no historical precedents for such a concept, it must have come from Dune. Herbert, on the other hand, generated the idea out of thin air. Fremen ~ Sand People: Remember in Episode III where Anakin Skywalker, the Chosen One, trained with the Sand People, then enlisted their help to overthrow the Empire? Chrysknife ~ Light Saber: Yes, a knife is very similar to a glowing energy sword, in that they can both be used to cut things. And of course, a lightsaber is nothing at all like a samurai sword, wielded by highly-trained individuals with their own code of honor. No, it's much more like a dagger. Sarlac Pit ~ Sand Worm: Remember in Return of the Jedi, when Luke rode the Sarlacc Pit, then led the Sand People to overthrow the Empire? Face it: Star Wars is similar to Dune on a purely superficial level, and that is only because they both draw from the same common mythology that has been around for thousands of years. Wow, Paul Atreides is the "Chosen One,"who is prophesied to return and free his people. Later, he dies. That describes both Dune and The New Testament. In fact, I see many similarities between the two: Dune: Egypt Fremen: Jews Muad'Dib: Jesus Crysknife: Sword Jedi Mind Trick: Walking On Water Gurney Halleck: Peter Sand Worm: Uh...the Pharisees? Yeah, I think that's right. I can't believe all the similarities between Dune and the Bible. Both have a main character who is the Chosen One, does some things, has conflicts, and later dies. It's so blatant. I can't believe that King James person ripped off Frank Herbert!

    87. Re:If only by Thorkytel+Ant-Head · · Score: 1

      Dune ~ Tattooine: both desert planets. Check.

      Lasguns ~ Blasters: I can't believe that Star Wars stole the idea of laser guns, which were of course invented by Frank Herbert.

      Gurney Halek ~ Han Solo: Remember how in Star Wars, Han Solo was a noble soldier who is fiercely loyal to the royal family, and how he never looks out for himself?

      Voice ~ Jedi mind trick: Frank Herbert also invented the concept of telepathy.

      Sardaukar ~ Storm Troopers: Yes, I can't imagine where Lucas would have gotten the idea of an army of ruthlessly-loyal soldiers called "storm troopers."Since there are no historical precedents for such a concept, it must have come from Dune. Herbert, on the other hand, generated the idea out of thin air.

      Fremen ~ Sand People: Remember in Episode III where Anakin Skywalker, the Chosen One, trained with the Sand People, then enlisted their help to overthrow the Empire?

      Chrysknife ~ Light Saber: Yes, a knife is very similar to a glowing energy sword, in that they can both be used to cut things. And of course, a lightsaber is nothing at all like a samurai sword, wielded by highly-trained individuals with their own code of honor. No, it's much more like a dagger.

      Sarlac Pit ~ Sand Worm: Remember in Return of the Jedi, when Luke rode the Sarlacc Pit, then led the Sand People to overthrow the Empire?

      Face it: Star Wars is similar to Dune on a purely superficial level, and that is only because they both draw from the same common mythology that has been around for thousands of years. Wow, Paul Atreides is the "Chosen One,"who is prophesied to return and free his people. Later, he dies. That describes both Dune and The New Testament. In fact, I see many similarities between the two:

      Dune: Egypt

      Fremen: Jews

      Muad'Dib: Jesus

      Crysknife: Sword

      Jedi Mind Trick: Walking On Water

      Gurney Halleck: Peter

      Sand Worm: Uh...the Pharisees? Yeah, I think that's right.

      I can't believe all the similarities between Dune and the Bible. Both have a main character who is the Chosen One, does some things, has conflicts, and later dies. It's so blatant. I can't believe that King James person ripped off Frank Herbert!

    88. Re:If only by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      But my wife wouldn't play along. In fact she hit me.

      Then I hope you nailed her with a right cross to the jaw.

    89. Re:If only by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      I don't think he choked any Generals. Admirals and Captains yes, but the only Imperial General that I can recall is Veers in the AT-AT on Hoth, and he did his job well enough not to be choke slammed.

    90. Re:If only by Scudsucker · · Score: 1
      utting a kid in a sequel because you think you need a kid is no different from putting jar-jar binks in episode 1 because you think you need a moronic character that appeals (somehow) to children. Lucas thoughtfully did both in episode 1, of course...

      Which is totally unecessary, of course, and is a point Lucas's defenders always miss. Ep 1 did not need Jar Jar to bring the kiddies to the movie, that was already a given. It is perfectly possible to make a movie that appeals to kids without scaring the crap out of them, AND not piss off/nausiate adults at the same time. Willow or Narnia would be good examples of this.

    91. Re:If only by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      And totally off on a tangent, what is with everyone thinking TRON is shit?

      Maybe it's to do with that dumb 'binary digit' character that actually has 3 states instead of 2?

      Such a rookie mistake.

    92. Re:If only by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Or one of my favourites: "I can arrange that!"

    93. Re:If only by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      Yes, that always seemed obvious to me. Seeing as how they had been banging on about the dark side of the force for FIVE FILMS, and was a MAJOR THEME of the story, you'd think some people would say "Hey, maybe Anakin's not in control of himself, and the dark side is amplifying his emotions and causing him to act outside his character."

      But no, guess it was just you and me.

    94. Re:If only by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      I'll just hand in my geek card then :(

    95. Re:If only by neuromancer2701 · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what I feel, It just amazed me that the Wachowski built a whole highway to do the car chase in Reloaded. When you have so much CGI, it is hard to believe that you are really in a Fantasy world. Doku(the actor) is 60-some years old I don't believe for one instance that he could pull off that CGI flip at the begining of III.

      --
      "If you like Battlestar Galactica, you're probably a huge nerd." -Stephen Colbert
    96. Re:If only by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Shh! No pointing out the gaping plot holes!

      Yeah, or we'll be here all day.. :P

    97. Re:If only by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      I'll just hand in my geek card then :(

      Pfft. If I were a real Star Wars card carrying geek, I could have not only told you who got whacked, but the names of the actors who played the Admirals/Captains in question.

      For example, my sister is friends with a guy who has a whole room dedicated to Star Wars in his basement. She was giving him crap for knowing the names of all the Ewoks you see in ROTJ, when she said, "well at least you don't know the names of all the actors who played all the Ewoks. He started to look very sheepish and a little red in the face.

  6. Who shot first? by booch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is it truly the original? Did Han shoot first?

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    1. Re:Who shot first? by iamjoltman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know if you're being serious, but the answer is yes. That is probably one of the prime factors people think of in terms of original vs SE, and if they claimed it was the original and didn't have that, they would just be shooting themselves in the foot. But I guess the foot would have to shoot at them first, missing horribly.
      Anyway, one of the first images you see at starwars.com says
      This September: Original Unaltered Trilogy on DVD
      See Han Solo shoot first

    2. Re:Who shot first? by Megane · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not truly the original if it says "A NEW HOPE" in the title. But it's close enough.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Who shot first? by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      This September: Original Unaltered Trilogy on DVD
      See Han Solo shoot first


      Rated M for extreme violence with a laser gun towards alien species.

    4. Re:Who shot first? by redtape · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this is the original, Han doesn't shoot "first" since, in the original, Greedo NEVER shot!

    5. Re:Who shot first? by GundamFan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's just silly... the whole point of "shoting first" is to kill the other guy before he shots you.

      So yes he shot first but he also shot last.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    6. Re:Who shot first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a new twist where Jabba the Hut shoots first and than Han goes guns a blazing while the GI Joe theme plays. It was the original vision that just wasn't possible with special effects of the time.

    7. Re:Who shot first? by brian0918 · · Score: 1, Funny

      "That's just silly... the whole point of "shoting first" is to kill the other guy before he shots you."

      It sounds like George W. Bush is a fan of the original theatrical release.

    8. Re:Who shot first? by CptNerd · · Score: 1


      Actually, in '77 it didn't have anything but "Star Wars" in the title. I don't even remember it in the "scoller" text until the re-release before "Empire".

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    9. Re:Who shot first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, NERD.

    10. Re:Who shot first? by alumshubby · · Score: 1

      That's the way I remembered it too -- Greedo never got a shot off; Han gutshot him under the table. One round expended.

      --
      "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    11. Re:Who shot first? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Bah, "a new hope" this and that...
      It's not really original unless the story revolves around the Starkiller, son of the suns. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    12. Re:Who shot first? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      With this debate about who should shoot first or who didn't shoot or who should've been shooting, an outsider would imagine you'd be directing a porn movie. :-p

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    13. Re:Who shot first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No no, this is the ORIGINAL original where Aalderan shot first.

      That poor little station was just defending itself. Especially after being insulted and called a moon.

    14. Re:Who shot first? by dswensen · · Score: 2, Informative

      TFA seems to have been edited from last night, but last night it read:

      See the title crawl to Star Wars before it was known as Episode IV; see the pioneering, if dated, motion control model work on the attack on the Death Star; groove to Lapti Nek or the Ewok Celebration song like you did when you were a kid; and yes, see Han Solo shoot first.

    15. Re:Who shot first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

    16. Re:Who shot first? by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If this is the original, Han doesn't shoot "first" since, in the original, Greedo NEVER shot!

      That's because Greedo was so coked up at the time. If you look at the original print, Greedo had a white powdery ring around his nose. That's one thing that was digitally changed in the SEs.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    17. Re:Who shot first? by edwdig · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Greedo didn't shoot, but he was sitting there with a gun pointed at Han saying "I'm going to kill you."

      Han killing Greedo before Greedo can get a shot off doesn't make Han a bad ass, it just makes Greedo an idiot.

    18. Re:Who shot first? by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

      Yes. "Episode IV: A New Hope" was added to the opening crawl for the '81 re-release. It wasn't present in the 1977 original.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    19. Re:Who shot first? by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Indeed, any serious bounty hunter should've said, "Hands on the table, palms down or I shoot."

    20. Re:Who shot first? by mph · · Score: 1
      if they claimed it was the original and didn't have that, they would just be shooting themselves in the foot.
      The foot shot first.
    21. Re:Who shot first? by nih · · Score: 1

      dunno, but we will find out when the HD version ships, or has he said that will 'never be released' either?

      --
      I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
    22. Re:Who shot first? by soft_guy · · Score: 0, Troll

      It sounds like George W. Bush is a fan of the original theatrical release.

      When did Bush ever shoot anyone first? That guy is a total punk. He was too much coward to go to Vietnam. He let China ram our spy plane that was in international waters and capture our people and hold them hostage and then he apologized to them. Then he let 9/11 happen. Then we go to war in Iraq and basically lose. Then Iran starts pushing us around because they know Bush is even bigger chump than Jimmy Carter.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    23. Re:Who shot first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not who shot first its whos ON first..silly 40 year olds in moms basements

      in other news george lucas died today and anyone who didnt really give a shit got to breathe a sigh of relief that his dream of star wars dorks taking over the world will never come to be.

    24. Re:Who shot first? by xmuskrat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't quite remember if that's true or not. I might have been coked up at the time.

      --
      activestudios web design
    25. Re:Who shot first? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Then we go to war in Iraq and basically lose.

      But Iraq was a smashing success, from a certain point of view.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    26. Re:Who shot first? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Indeed, any serious bounty hunter should've said, "Hands on the table, palms down or I shoot."

      Any serious bounty hunter who's going to shoot you and collect the reward for your carcass from a local gangster isn't going to warn you, he's going to shoot you from behind and collect the reward.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    27. Re:Who shot first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in Soviet Russia, Han shot Greedo

    28. Re:Who shot first? by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Yeah he did, but unfortunately, Alderaan also shot first which kind of ruined the plot of all 3 movies... :P

    29. Re:Who shot first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my "original original" bootleg from ~1980 the X-Wing fighters didn't have little red glowing engines in back, visible (or not) during the formation flying scenes between the Yavin moon and the Death Star. All of the so-called "original" DVDs I've seen have them.

      Yes, I'm a geek. I memorized the entire dialoge and recited it in 8th grade homeroom with another geek friend. I've sort-of out-grown that but can't help myself to this day when the movie comes on. . .drives my wife batty :-)

      T.

  7. Release to Theatres for Every Generation by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know, there's something undeniably good about Episodes IV, V & VI.

    Especially when you see it on the big screen. Unfortunately, I was born in 1982 meaning that I wasn't quite to the point of being able to go see it in theatres when it was released. But the special edition releases changed all that--though the changes George Lucas made did leave me feeling kind of hollow (wtf, Han?).

    I would think that the mass turn out to see the special edition movies would be proof enough that releasing the originals to theatres every ten years would be profitable. In fact, I would conjecture that releasing it every ten years would give everyone the chance to see it at an early age and be beneficial to the Star Wars franchise. I know Lucas wouldn't be able to resist changing parts of it but hopefully he'll be preoccupied with destroying the Indiana Jones Trilogy by then.

    I did notice that Mr. Lucas isn't cited once in this article and instead we hear from Jim Ward who is perhaps actually interested in what the fans have to say as they are providing his paycheck.

    If you were to ask me on any day of the week, "Would you like to go see one of the Star Wars movies on the big screen?" You bet I would. It's immeasurably better than the utter drek that's in theatres now. Oftentimes my friends propose we go see a movie only to discover that there is nothing but pure crap. What does Lucasfilm have that so few movies today lack? Timelessness--the ability to surpass the aging of the film and the advances in technology that every movie today uses.

    While it's true I'm a fan of Star Wars so my opinion might be biased, I've never found anyone who's outright hated it.

    Well, I got original separate movies for my birthday at a young age, the VHS set of this trilogy when I was about 15, I bought the special edition DVDs in wide screen format a couple years ago and now it looks like I'll be purchasing yet another copy of these movies. Boy, Lucasfilm sure has my number.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Bromskloss · · Score: 1
      though the changes George Lucas made did leave me feeling kind of hollow (wtf, Han?).
      Pleas educate me. What was that all about?
      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    2. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's referring to who shot first in the cantina.

      This article was brought to you from the Han-shoots-first-again department afterall.

    3. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by the_duke_of_hazzard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "While it's true I'm a fan of Star Wars so my opinion might be biased, I've never found anyone who's outright hated it. " I hated it. Although I'm 30 I first watched IV in the cinema in the late nineties. I was bored by the barely-existent plot, the generally poor acting. Only Ford and Guinness made it worth watching. I would have walked out otherwise.

    4. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Scratched · · Score: 1

      it looks like I'll be purchasing yet another copy of these movies. Boy, Lucasfilm sure has my number.

      Don't give in to hollywood's remarketing schemes. Wait until they release all 6 Star Wars moves on DVD in a set (or HD-DVD/Blu-Ray at this rate) and buy them all at once. That's what I'm going to do. I own IV, V, & VI on VHS from when they were digitally remastered before they added scenes. I'm going to wait until all 6 are available in one big box set since I'm sure that it'll happen some day. Until then, I can wait a while and save my money.

    5. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you were to ask me on any day of the week, "Would you like to go see one of the Star Wars movies on the big screen?" You bet I would.

      Actually, that is what I did in 77, 80, and 83. Which is what I thought

      That means you'll be able to enjoy Star Wars as it first appeared in 1977, Empire in 1980, and Jedi in 1983.

      meant.

      I haven't read the FA yet. But I'm wondering how "original" these are. Personally, I liked all of the remastering and cleanups they did to the special addition ones. I liked the introduction of Jabba in IV. The _only_ thing that disgusted me about the remakes was the Han Solo/Greedo thing. That was BS.

    6. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by curecollector · · Score: 1

      I don't see why they aren't planning a theatrical re-releade - it's a no brainer. Look at Hollywood these days - remake, remake, sequel, remake. Why not more re-releases (not just of Star Wars, but of the classic Disney movies, or the Wizard of Oz)? Trifling production costs (the films have already been made and paid for many times over) + mass popular appeal = big profit margin. I'd rather see the original trilogy or something like Snow White on the big screen than an unecessary remake of "The Warriors" (wtf?), "Miami Vice" or "The Dukes of Hazard".

    7. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      They cropped a lot of incidental violence, as part of Lucas's conversion to namby pambyism. Like a lot of people who get shot, actually "fell down" in the original version. He hacked out a few frames around a lot of the shot people, to "lower the impact" of some nameless badguy getting whacked.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    8. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1
      "Don't give in to hollywood's remarketing schemes. Wait until they release all 6 Star Wars moves on DVD in a set (or HD-DVD/Blu-Ray at this rate) and buy them all at once. That's what I'm going to do. I own IV, V, & VI on VHS from when they were digitally remastered before they added scenes. I'm going to wait until all 6 are available in one big box set since I'm sure that it'll happen some day. Until then, I can wait a while and save my money."
      And then, Lucas decides to make 7, 8, and 9. All fall before Lucas. Some fall early, some fall late but everyone will BUY, BUY, BUY.
    9. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I'm reparenting to your post, but sort of responding to the guy who referred to your the_duke_of_hazzard userid.

      I went to the theatre to see Star Wars when it first came out, I was in college at the time. My basic thought was, kind of fun, but it's really a swashbuckler, not science fiction.

      It took until 2001: A Space Odyssey to get away from aerodynamic, winged spaceships that made noise in space. Star Wars kept spaceships "lumpy", but really tacked on technobabble rather than function. For a fighter that takes off from a planet, I guess maybe wings would be acceptable, but making banked turns in space isn't. Nor is noise, except in a cockpit shot.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    10. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      I got the Executor Ltd Ed. Tin Box set of the original trilogy on VHS with extras on a seperate tape plus script books for 80GBP before the special editions came out. It's the last time i bought any star wars film, until now! i know they'll release another version, but i really want to watch nice clean remastered star wars without the unconvincing CGI spoiling the mood.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    11. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by fprintf · · Score: 1

      Um, didn't 2001 come out in the 60's? Not sure of your timeline of "it took until" unless you really meant 2010.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    12. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Reverberant · · Score: 1
      But I'm wondering how "original" these are.

      Very original - as in no "Episode IV" in the Star Wars opening crawl.

    13. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banked turns help even in space because the acceleration on the pilot and passengers is mostly downward into the seat. Not that I don't agree with you: Star Wars is fantasy not science fiction.

    14. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Won't argue with G effects on the people. It's just that in space, you can't use aerodynamic forces on the wings to do a banked turn. To do a tight, accelerating turn, your main thrust has to be pointed approximately directly away from the centerpoint of the turn. I say approximately because most of your acceleration will be radial, with the leftover for tangential.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    15. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Either 1968 or 1969, so I'm showing my age. Prior to 2001, spaceships in movies were all aerodynamic, had wings, etc. They also spent practically all of their time spewing flames (or other force-glow) out the back end, instead of mostly coasting between spurts of acceleration.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    16. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Star Wars isn't a sci-fi movie, or even a "space" movie for that matter. It is an action/serial movie with some great "war movie" type dogfights thrown in. When Lucas tried to develop the "romance" part of the stroy is when it all starts to go south...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    17. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mean hey, it's not like it's rocket science or anything...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    18. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by 7grain · · Score: 1


      ...but hopefully he'll be preoccupied with destroying the Indiana Jones Trilogy by then.

      Already been done. It was called "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom." And the third one wasn't much to write home about, either.

    19. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by LqqkOut · · Score: 1

      To me this wouldn't be much different than the innumerable midnight "Rocky Horror Picture Show" screenings. There's a huge fan and nostalgia base that attends those events and I for one would be happy to pay for my younger siblings (and kids when I have them) to go to Star Wars night.

      --

      -- In Soviet Russia, radio listens to YOU!

    20. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by fbjon · · Score: 1

      What? I think the third movie is better than the first, it's much more intense and fun to watch. The first one is good and interesting, but is a bit slow sometimes. And I don't mean slow-down-to-build-character, but a this-is-an-older-movie kind of slow.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    21. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Kelson · · Score: 1

      re-releases...of the classic Disney movies

      Disney used to have a standard 7-year cycle on which they would re-release their major cartoons. The idea was that 7 years was just the right amount of time to get an entirely new generation of kids in the target audience. When I was growing up in the 1980s, I saw more classic Disney movies in the theater than new ones.

      The schedule has slackened a bit recently, though.

      I think the most recent regular re-release was The Little Mermaid in 1997 (8 years from the original release, and nothing since). There was also an IMAX re-release of Beauty and the Beast in 2002 (11 years), in which they added an extra song, "Human Again," that had been written for the movie, but didn't get used until they put together the Broadway version.

      I don't know why Disney stopped re-releasing their films, but the timing coincides suspiciously with the appearance of direct-to-video sequels.

    22. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You weren't disgusted by han solo stepping on a very slightly levitating and less-real-looking-than-the-puppet CG Jabba, and not getting turned into a grease spot by his several attendant bodyguards? Hand in your geek card please, kthx.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by ao_coder · · Score: 1

      They also changed some of the soundtrack (I noticed this at the end of 6 at least). I agree though that blacker space, more impressive lasers, and less cheezy computer consoles were a welcome addition. I just objected to the additional and modified scenes. They were uniformly bad calls IMO. Now if only they'd release the original bladerunner on dvd... Even though I seem to be one of three people on the planet that think that the director's cut totally ruined the film noire tone of the original.

      --
      The best lack all convictions, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. -Yeats, The Second Coming
    24. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Anonymous+Coward+Gra · · Score: 1

      Make it 4 people then, cause I prefer the original Blade Runner also.

    25. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by smaffei · · Score: 1

      Yes..

      Also, a few of the Imperial officers / techs smoked a bit more when short in the original Star Wars. I remember that because I thought that was really cool when I was a kid.

      --
      Sure, Windows PCs dominate the market. But so do cheap toupees.
  8. Awesome by squarooticus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I bought the four disc DVD set when it came out, but that POS is hitting half.com when I get my hands on this. Finally, no Jabba, no "whoosh!" at Alderaan, no ring of fire when the Death Star explodes, no interruption of the wonderful "Hyperspace" piece at the end of Empire, and...

    HAN FIRES FIRST!

    --
    [ home ]
    1. Re:Awesome by curecollector · · Score: 1

      no Jabba

      Yes! I am surprised that more people haven't bitched about this - and even then, it's always because of how he appears (small, mobile, making goofy facial expressions, etc, etc) and never that the conversation with him is damn near the same conversation Han had with Greedo just a minute before.

      It always struck me as a bit hypocritical on the part of GL, when I'd hear his commentaries re: deleted scenes (how he always wanted to add the scene, but felt it extraneous or redundant, etc.) and then he'd go add all sorts of other extraneous, redundant footage, marketing them as "enhancements".

      Don't get me wrong - I find his motives for going back and reworking the originals admirable. I just think the execution was poor, IMHO.

    2. Re:Awesome by PMuse · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm impressed. I had assumed when LucasFilm released the last of the films on DVD that the only way for them to milk more money out of us was to release a 6-movie boxed set (probably in 4Q 2006). How wrong I was. Clearly, their schwartz is bigger than mine.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    3. Re:Awesome by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      There is only 1 good addition to the special editions - the sound was improved. All the new scenes did what exactly? Padded a film out.

      If it's not there to help tell the story better, to give more depth to characters, then don't add it in.

    4. Re:Awesome by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      no Jabba

      Yes! I am surprised that more people haven't bitched about this - and even then, it's always because of how he appears (small, mobile, making goofy facial expressions, etc, etc) and never that the conversation with him is damn near the same conversation Han had with Greedo just a minute before


      Here's what bothered me about that scene. Imagine you're the biggest crime boss in the galaxy. You're chewing out some underling that just cost you a lot of money. And he steps on your tail! Don't you think you'd do a little more than give a quick squeal?
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    5. Re:Awesome by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the good ol' fashioned sarlac pit! The stupid flytrap tentacles were way less scary than the original leathery tendrils coming out of a gaping desert mouth.

    6. Re:Awesome by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      And after having watched the godlike 4 min. shorter edition, you will finally enter Geek Nirvana and live happily ever after? :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    7. Re:Awesome by sootman · · Score: 1

      Lucas is an evil genius. This was probably his plan all along. I bet he's been watching sales of the trilogy and they probably hit 10 per month so now he comes out and says "OK, here you go." At least I won't have to run out to buy them on the first day, though. The thing is, I wish he'd go halfway and release a perfectly cleaned up version but without the extras. Remove the slugs from the Emperor's face, get rid of the mattes around the ships, etc. (You know, the things he didn't even fix for the most recent version.) He doesn't even have to tweak things like the shadow under the landspeeder--things that 'could look better'--just fix the things that are actually *wrong.*

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    8. Re:Awesome by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      There is only 1 good addition to the special editions - the sound was improved.

      I disagree, some scenes were also recreated and touched up. Some of these recreations were much needed in order to keep the film credible under current standards. There are many subtle changes you wouldn't even notice them had it not been for a side to side viewing of the originals and the new versions.

      Take a look at the following article, which describes some of these changes:

      http://www.dvdactive.com/editorial/articles/star-w ars-the-changes-part-one

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    9. Re:Awesome by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      Back then Jabba wasn't a big crime boss. He was lower down on the rung, nicer, smaller, more gentle. As hutts gain more power and influence they grow larger and meaner; you can tell that, in Return of the Jedi, Han tries to bargain with Jabba just like he always did, but Jabba will have none of that. While Han's been gone in ANH and TESB, Jabba got big, bad, and mean.

      So what I'm trying to say is that it was entirely intentional that Jabba was laid back in that scene. It was cut for budget purposes; if it had been in the original release and you saw it BEFORE you saw RotJ, instead of saying "that's stupid, Jabba's acting nice" you would have thought "wow, in a few years this Jabba guy turned into a jerk."

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    10. Re:Awesome by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Maybe you would have thought that, but I sure wouldn't have. For more realistic rises to power in a similar framework check out the Godfather (the book mostly, the movie if necessary).

      So now explain why Jabba was big in Episode I, small in Episode IV, and then big in Episode VI.

    11. Re:Awesome by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Goes to show - I hadn't even noticed most of those enhancements. Then again, I first went aged 8, and the 2nd time I was about 28.

    12. Re:Awesome by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      I think comparing Star Wars to The Godfather in terms of realistic depiction of crime bosses is one of the least productive uses of our time.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    13. Re:Awesome by Mindwarp · · Score: 1

      So now explain why Jabba was big in Episode I, small in Episode IV, and then big in Episode VI.

      I'm going to go with the Atkins diet followed by middle-age spread.

      --
      The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
    14. Re:Awesome by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      In general, I too am happy that I will be able to watch the originals as they were released 20 years ago. I still treasure my VHS versions of the films, and even downloaded the Laser original versions out there on the Torrents. This definitely is a good move by Mr. Lucas.

      To top it all, this edition will be released along with the Lego Starwars II game sequel. My kid totally digs this game. September is a month to be looked forward too.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    15. Re:Awesome by isomeme · · Score: 1
      Yes! I am surprised that more people haven't bitched about this - and even then, it's always because of how he appears (small, mobile, making goofy facial expressions, etc, etc) and never that the conversation with him is damn near the same conversation Han had with Greedo just a minute before.
      I'm with you on this. It's so obvious that what we're seeing is the result of a last-minute script rewrite in the origional where the dialog with Jabba was reassigned to Greedo. And then Lucas thought nobody would care that the same dialog gets used in the very next scene in his reissued version.

      I lost interest in the reissued version at that point; if Lucas doesn't care about it, why should I?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    16. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the scene was originally shot Jabba was intended to be humanoid, not a slug. Solo is just walking around a man. The scene was scrapped because making Jabba the slug mobile wouldn't be realistic. The scene was pointless other than to add 30sec to Empire and to allow ILM to master CGI for the prequels.

    17. Re:Awesome by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, there are some beautiful effects shots that I'll miss from the special editions that I do think added a nice amount of atmosphere.. the cloud city wide shots, a few of the Millenium Falcon shots from Episode 4, the X-Wing squadron from the same episode. Unfortunately, many redone effects shots also stand out a little too much from the rest of the movie in quality so as a whole they detract, even if they individually look very nice. And some shots seemed pretty pointless, designed only to draw attention to themselves (the reptiles on Tattoine).

      When the Special Edition for Star Trek: The Motion Picture was being created, effects shots were touched up and added because the original movie was never really finished. Bob Wise made a smart decision when he said he wanted all the new effects shots for the movie to look like they could have been created in 1979.. there were some CG Enterprise shots, but they looked like they fit in with the rest of the movie effects. Those shots did not call attention to themselves.

      What I'm happiest about: the original Return of the Jedi ending! I have a strong dislike for the 'new' end celebration theme (not that the original was great by any means).

    18. Re:Awesome by the_wesman · · Score: 1

      NOT awesome - or maybe awesome, depending on how hardcore you are - I want the original cut of the film in terms of the scenes, dialog, CGI, who-shot-whom, no jabba, etc. BUT, with a modern 5.1 uber surround mix for my phat-ass home theatre (pronounced: the-ate-ur) - they're pushing it out here as the original film with the original stereo "dolby" (pronounced: lame*) surround...

      *please note that I have nothing against, dolby, thomas dolby or rock albums mixed in dubly - you just can't get a real exciting surround mix from a stereo source no matter what yer damn entertainment center does

      --
      calling all destroyers
    19. Re:Awesome by VWJedi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you sure Jabba was in Episode I? I just remember references to "the Hutts". Several of them (of various sizes) appear on screen at the pod race. Do they ever specify which (if any) of them are Jabba?

    20. Re:Awesome by Kelson · · Score: 1

      the conversation with him is damn near the same conversation Han had with Greedo just a minute before.

      That actually was my biggest problem with the way they restored the scene. It just doesn't add anything to the movie.

      I always figured that back in 1977, when they realized they couldn't use the Jabba scene, they worked the most important bits of info into the Greedo scene. Maybe they shot pick-ups, maybe they just wrote new subtitles for Greedo. For the Special Edition, since they wanted to restore the scene with Jabba, they had two ways they could do so *and* use it to enhance the movie:

      1. Change Greedo's dialogue so that Jabba's isn't redundant.
      2. Change Jabba's dialogue and edit the footage so that it isn't redundant.

      They don't have to worry about lip-syncing Greedo or Jabba. And they were animating Jabba from scratch, so they could do whatever they wanted. The only thing that would be a pain to change would be the footage of Han -- getting Harrison Ford to dub some dialogue, getting the animators to lip-sync the visuals like Contact did with Pres. Clinton -- and even that could be rearranged.

      Instead, the scene they put in is virtually identical to the scene I remember seeing in one of those making-of specials, except that it had a CGI giant slug speaking Huttese instead of a guy in a mangy fur coat speaking English.

    21. Re:Awesome by thepotoo · · Score: 1
      Don't you think you'd do a little more than give a quick squeal?

      Not if you didn't have the stock footage for it. What were they going to do? Bring back a 20-years-older Ford to be killed by Jabba? What, leave the scene out altogether? Impossible! Every pice of stock footage must be used! Lucas demands it!

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    22. Re:Awesome by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      The thing I liked in the originals was how you always hear about Jabba the Hutt in ANH and Empire, and Han just builds him up, but you never see him until ROTJ. It's always nice when they talk up a character like that, leaving you wondering who and what he is before finally showing him.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    23. Re:Awesome by Kelson · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much what I figured when I watched the Special Edition. He was a small-time boss when Han was working for him, then became big-time over the 2-3 years leading up to Return of the Jedi. Though I figured the weight gain was just Jabba getting older.

      Then Episode I came out, with a full-sized, powerful Jabba at the pod race, destroying that theory...

      (It also needs to be kept in mind that the tail-stepping wasn't in the original verion of the scene. They just came up with it as a way to reconcile the fact that Han walked around the stand-in with the fact that the later design for Jabba had a tail. Hey, why cut two seconds when you can come up with a technically fun but plotwise-dubious challenge instead!)

    24. Re:Awesome by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I suggest you sell it now so that A) you already have the money when the new set comes out and B) so that someone who hasn't heard that a better set is coming out will actually buy it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, at the Pod race, Jabba was there with a couple other Hutts.

    26. Re:Awesome by VWJedi · · Score: 1

      I don't have time to rewatch it right now (plus all my DVDs are packed up in a box), but I recall getting the impression that "the big Hutt" was not Jabba.

    27. Re:Awesome by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      While you may have gotten that impression, it was wrong. Sorry.

      Jabba the Hutt presides over the Boonta Eve Podrace.

    28. Re:Awesome by VWJedi · · Score: 1
      I stand corrected. The script (http://www.imsdb.com/scripts/Star-Wars-The-Phanto m-Menace.html) says "Jabba the Hutt", but the only dialogue that mentions the name is in Huttese.

      I guess I need to practice my Huttese.

  9. BASTARDS! by aborchers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I should have known they'd eventually cave to milk another buck out of me. I never would have bought the redux trilogy if I'd believed this was coming. Sad thing is, I know I'll buy them...

    --
    Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    1. Re:BASTARDS! by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I absolutely refused to buy the previous versions, and now it looks like my patience has paid off! Sorry you had to waste all your hard-earned cash on garbage, but good things come to those who wait. Now, are these available in wide-screen/letterbox format?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:BASTARDS! by aborchers · · Score: 1

      I'm not among the redux haters, so I don't mind that I bought those versions. I'm just miffed that I have to re-buy them to get the originals!

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:BASTARDS! by SpiritGod21 · · Score: 1

      Ditto =(

    4. Re:BASTARDS! by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Same here. I have the originals (well, IV and V) on VHS, and will be buying these. I ALMOST bought the 2004 releases on DVD, but stopped myself at the last minute, and am glad I did.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    5. Re:BASTARDS! by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lucas releases Star Wars Trilogy on DVD!

      Slashdot: You suck! We don't want Han to shoot first! Gives us the original version, not the Special Edition!

      Lucas releases Classic Star Wars Trilogy on DVD!

      Slashdot: You suck! I... uh... asked for this a year ago.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    6. Re:BASTARDS! by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      Lucas: Okay, these VHS tapes? Yeah, last time we'll ever be releasing Star Wars. Evar. Hate DVDs.

      Fans: WTF. Oh well, sure, I'll buy them. Even though they're that special edition crap. Can't we just get the original version?

      Lucas: No they are perfect now as only I can make them. And, oh wait, OLO changed my mind. They're out on DVD now. Still Special Edition though.

      Fans: Can't you give us a regular edition?

      Lucas: Naw, never gonna happen. This is my SPECIAL ORIGINAL VISION.

      Fans: Grrr... okay.

      Lucas: Hahahaha you suckers. I need more money. Now I'm going to release the original version on DVD again.

    7. Re:BASTARDS! by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Not just special edition, specialer updated to fit better with the crappy prequels edition. So now we have Hayden Christensen showing up as the ghost Anakin and Ian McDiarmid plays the emperor for his holo in Empire. Also, IIRC, they made Han shoot slightly faster in this one so while he still shoots after Greedo, it's a little bit more reasonable.

    8. Re:BASTARDS! by aborchers · · Score: 1

      I think you miss my point. I probably would have bought both editions and been happy, but why do I now have to re-buy the redux bundled with the original version?

      BTW, the market for the used copies of the redux trilogy just went down the toilet. I'll credit them with brilliant fan-screwing strategy.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    9. Re:BASTARDS! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Put it on half.com or ebay now. Most people won't have heard of this yet. I doubt even a quarter of the people who are in the market for the SW trilogy read slashdot, but it could be close to that :D

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. The almighty dollar by viking099 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, now we know that even someone like George Lucas can be influenced by the promise of a ton of money. Well... probably not Lucas himself but all the people who can influence him.

    So now we'll have the opportunity to purchase yet another copy, bringing some people up to 5 seperate copies of the same set of movies.

    That's pretty impressive.

    1. Re:The almighty dollar by TrickFred · · Score: 1

      Only 5?

      - original VHS release
      - original betamax release
      - 1995 THX VHS release
      - 1997 Special Edition fullscreen VHS release
      - 1997 Special Edition widescreen VHS release
      - laserdisc releases
      - first DVD release
      - this DVD release ...and I'm sure I'm missing one or two...

    2. Re:The almighty dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I like the movies I think I'll stick with the original version that I have on VHS. I'm tired of spending more money on the same movie just beacuse they are trying to milk it.

    3. Re:The almighty dollar by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Well, now we know that even someone like George Lucas can be influenced by the promise of a ton of money.

      You realise that only now? I thought that was the only reason the Ewoks appeared in 1983. Cutesy furry merchandise.

    4. Re:The almighty dollar by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      You do realize the whole reason for Jar Jar was that Paul Allen bet him ten million USD that he wouldn't put a completely stupid main character into Episode I.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  11. Can he do that? by twoshortplanks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seem to remember back when they were selling the original films on VHS in the UK shortly before the remastered version came out the advertising said that this was the last chance to buy this version of the film.

    --
    -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    1. Re:Can he do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can George Lucas lie to his fanbase? Easily and often, if it means more money to him.

    2. Re:Can he do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they can, after all it was the list chance to buy the orginal film they just didnt mention it was the last chance to buy it on VHS and it would eventually be re-released on DVD and any other format they decide to sell it on in the future.

      Saying that I have bought the trilogy 4 times already (Original VHS, Remastered Audio VHS, "Special Edition" VHS and the current DVDs) I dont suppose another will really hurt although I may wait for the near enveitable HD versions.

    3. Re:Can he do that? by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I wonder if they can after having announced this...
      Maybe they'll hire actors and cut together a new edition, calling it the original one. :-p

      Seriously, the only thing that claim would tell me is that:
      1. We don't plan to release the original one in more editions => this is your last chance.
      2. We changed our minds.
      3. Profit.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:Can he do that? by alanQuatermain · · Score: 1

      I had all those -- the remastered, cleaned-up copies of the original releases? The quote wasn't that this was the last chance to purchase the films, it was this was likely their last chance to clean up and remaster the original negatives. The reason being, the negatives were so badly degraded by this point that if they had waited a few years more, they wouldn't have been able to 'rescue' as much as they had-- we'd have been stuck a dodgy faded version for all time.

      -Q

    5. Re:Can he do that? by maxume · · Score: 1

      It seems that they could simply point to VHS and DVD as different versions.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Can he do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they truly said that, in advertisements, sue them. No, I'm serious. That's false advertisement. Even if there was some very, very minor detail that says otherwise, c'mon. The UK is a common law country. You still have a chance. Can't do it alone? Class action. Either way, while I have never fallen victim for something like this, I am sick and tired of "this is your LAST CHANCE" style false advertisement. I don't think it's a marketing ploy, I think it's down right lying. Don't you?

    7. Re:Can he do that? by steevo.com · · Score: 1

      Stan: You can't just come to a Civil War reenactment dressed up like General Lee, fatass!

      Cartman: Oh, really? I'm pretty sure I just did.

    8. Re:Can he do that? by ZOmegaZ · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for them to re-release Stargate. They said mine was the Ultimate Edition, dangit! If they release it again, it's just the PENULTIMATE edition, and I want my money back! Plus punitive damages, of course. Who's up for a class-action lawsuit?

    9. Re:Can he do that? by eldimo · · Score: 1

      I clearly remembered seeing "Last time to buy this version on VHS". At that time, I just started buying DVDs. So I realized that they meant that there was a chance that the original edition would be available at DVD in some future.

    10. Re:Can he do that? by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

      But this is a -different- version of the original version of the film. If the info we have is accurate, then this new edition will be much closer to the true original releases - down to things like the original Star Wars crawl (no "Ep. 4").

      So the versions that were incrementally altered over the years before the special editions aren't the same version.

      It's hair-splitting for sure, but there you have it. We can never again buy the 1994(?) version of the film, our current options are 2005 or 1977.

      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  12. Oh my Lord... by SStrungis · · Score: 1

    There goes half the fodder for Star Wars flamewars. No more Han shoots first...No more recasted Boba Fett...Aiiigh!
    Frist p0zt?

  13. As you wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally I get to hear the real voice for Boba Fett again: "As you wish." :) Rejoice Star Wars fans! :)

    1. Re:As you wish by 21st+Century+Peon · · Score: 1

      That wasn't Boba Fett - it was Westley!

      --
      "Knowledge, sir, should be free to all!"
      ~Harcourt Fenton Mudd
  14. WTF? 1977? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Everyone knows what the real classic star wars is ;-)

    On a slightly more serious note, I think these guys can give up now...

    And on a completely different note, please do not buy this download a high quality torrent instead. Seriously, I remember seeing TV ads for episodes 4-6 before the remastered edition came out saying "Last Chance to buy the trilogy." This was a lie then (as we got the remastered trilogy) and a bigger lie now. Tsk. Lucas has made enough money here allready.

    Oh, also checkout original cantina footage (not only does hans shoot first, but greedo has an english accent)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:WTF? 1977? by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      I'm buying it because it's the product I want. The people who should feel bad are the ones who knew the previous releases were butchered and paid for them anyways.

    2. Re:WTF? 1977? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
      And on a completely different note, please do not buy this download a high quality torrent instead.

      Thus proving the validity of this story.

      Just because you think Lucas has made enough money doesn't justify stealing his works. I'm presuming you feel it's acceptable to fill your tank with gas and drive off without paying because the oil companies have made enough money.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:WTF? 1977? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thus proving the validity of this story.

      Gosh, one poster on /. proves the validity of of an extremely speculative study?

      You're easy to make an impression on!

      Just because you think Lucas has made enough money doesn't justify stealing his works.

      No - I think that something that is thirty years old belongs in the public domain & the continual extensions of copyright is unjustly impoverishing the public domain.

      I'm presuming you feel it's acceptable to fill your tank with gas and drive off without paying because the oil companies have made enough money.

      I'm presuming you love to make childish analogies & enjoy projecting your prejudices on other's behavior. Let me explain it for you.

      Taking Petrol deprives the petrol station of petrol, they can't sell the petrol you've taken to anyone else.

      Copying a 20-30 year old work does not deprive the artist of that work. They've had plenty of opportunity to sell it & can continue to sell it.

      Yes, many people will argue the latter case is bad - but anyone who believes it is the direct equivalent of the former is.... well... let just say I think your world outlook is probably simplistic (at best).

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:WTF? 1977? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
      let just say I think your world outlook is probably simplistic (at best).

      No, yours is the simplistic one. You apparently believe that an artist should voluntarily give up work that they created to satisfy your desire to get something for nothing.

      While I am no fan of the nonsensical extensions of trademarks, patents, copyright and related matters, the fact of the matter is that Lucas created the work, Lucas produced the work and in most of the cases, Lucas distributed the work. He's the one who put in the effort to do all this so he should be rewarded for it. If you think 30 years is long enough then you create some cinematic masterpiece, make your billions for 30 years then you release it into the wild for the public. You have that right. Just as Lucas has the right to not release it.

      As far as the gas analogy, it is perfectly valid. You are depriving Lucas, and everyone else who gets a cut, of money. It doesn't matter that the work is in digitial form, which is nebulous, compared to oil, which is physical, the fact remains you are still taking something which isn't yours to begin with and not compensating the person who produced the work. Therefore, you are stealing.

      And yes, showing one example does validate the study. It only takes one. Your statement proves what the study, no matter how biased it may be, says is happening. Piracy is causing the loss of revenue to studios because people like you think it's acceptable to not compensate someone for their work.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:WTF? 1977? by Digi-John · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Copying a 20-30 year old work does not deprive the artist of that work. They've had plenty of opportunity to sell it & can continue to sell it.

      If our copyright terms hadn't been extended so many times, the movies could very well be in the public domain already; Lucas could keep selling them, but others would be free to distribute them as they please.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    6. Re:WTF? 1977? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      You apparently believe that an artist should voluntarily give up work that they created to satisfy your desire to get something for nothing.

      Nope, I believe it's fine to copy something thirty years old. I didn't say the artist had to do anything.

      As far as the gas analogy, it is perfectly valid.

      No its not. In one case you deprive the owner of the object you take, in the other case, you don't deprive the owner of the object you copy.

      I've seen Star Wars ep1 20+ times (at least five times in the cinema), on TV, rental vhs & rental dvd. I'm not going to buy it again (nor am I going to download it). If I did download it however, how would this cause Lucas harm?

      There is no moral equivilance between stealing a physical item & copying a creative work.

      And yes, showing one example does validate the study. It only takes one.

      You didn't say validate the study - you said proves the validity of the study. There is a huge difference.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    7. Re:WTF? 1977? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      "No its not. In one case you deprive the owner of the object you take, in the other case, you don't deprive the owner of the object you copy."

      I'm going to disagree.

      If you were to steal gasoline, you have deprived the owner of the money he would receive from the sale of the gasoline because the value of the gasoline to the owner is in the money he would make reselling it. So you have deprived the owner of the value of that object.

      The value of an object is defined by the person who owns it. A photograph of my parents may only be worth ten cents based upon the value of the paper and inks but, to me, it is priceless. The value of a one cent screw may be considerably more if it keeps the bookshelf from falling apart. And the value of a tanker of gasoline to a gas station owner may be $10,000--the profit he would make from selling that gasoline as well as sodas, snack food, etc. to people who came to his store to buy gasoline and "pick up a few things."

      Thus, by copying the work, you have deprived the owner of the value of the work as the owner sees it--namely, the cash he can make from selling it.

    8. Re:WTF? 1977? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      I'm going to disagree too.

      In your photograph & screw examples - how are you deprived if someone copies said screw or photograph? You still have the priceless photo of your parents, you still have the screw holding up your shelf.

      Thus, by copying the work, you have deprived the owner of the value of the work as the owner sees it--namely, the cash he can make from selling it.

      For how long? You make it sound like a natural right, rather then a government mandated monopoly.

      Remember - I was advocating people copy a 30 year old work, that has made its owner a lot of money - not wholesale breaking of copyright across the board.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    9. Re:WTF? 1977? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      "In your photograph & screw examples - how are you deprived if someone copies said screw or photograph? You still have the priceless photo of your parents, you still have the screw holding up your shelf."

      Agreed. I have not lost any of the value of the objects to me if you copy them. I still have the priceless photo and the shelf is still hanging.

      You'll notice that I keep emphasizing that word--value. If the value of an object is that I can resell it for something I might value more--say, money--then by copying it you have deprived me of the value of that object.

      "For how long? You make it sound like a natural right, rather then a government mandated monopoly."

      Well, arguably, as the owner, it would continue as long as it provides value to me. If that means my entire life, then I think that's reasonable. So if I got to define the law, I would make it such that the owner can continue to make money for the remainder of their life, but it cannot be transfered to kids, siblings, etc. If I write a beautiful song and die the next day, I get bupkus and so do my kids.

      That's my opinion on how it should work.

      "I was advocating people copy a 30 year old work, that has made its owner a lot of money - not wholesale breaking of copyright across the board."

      Why not copy a 15 year-old work that has made it's owner a lot of money. Why not copy a ten year-old work that has made it's owner a lot of money. Or a 3 year-old work? Or a 6 month-old work? And who decides what is a "lot of money"? Personally, I think a million dollars is a lot of money. There are people who consider a million dollars to be pocket change. Who should decide what is "a lot of money"--the person who wants the object? Don't you think that person might be a tad biased? While the person who owns the object is also biased, the market will at least straighten them out.

      This is one reason I usually go with the opinion that it is stealing and not copyright violation. Enzo Ferrari made a bunch of money selling Ferrari sports cars. If I go to the factory, grab a freshly completed car, and drive off with it, I have stolen it. If I left him the "cost" of the car--ie, the cost of all the components--it would still be stealing. As the owner of the car, Enzo defines what the value of the car is. I don't get to tell him what the value of the car is--or, more accurately, I get to tell him whether his concept of the value and my concept of the value match by buying or not buying the car.

      Therefore George Lucas--as the owner of "Star Wars"--gets to decide the value of it. If he decides the value is zero and releases it to the public domain, that is his right. He could do that, too. But he won't while he can still get money for it--something he values. Which is his right, as the owner, to do. You may not like it, you may not agree with his choices, but that doesn't give you license to break whatever law you want to call it (theft or copyright violation).

    10. Re:WTF? 1977? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Aaaah, right - I understand now.

      Well, arguably, as the owner, it would continue as long as it provides value to me. If that means my entire life, then I think that's reasonable.

      Your one of the people who think copyright is a natural right - one that soley benefits the 'owner'.

      You do not believe it is (was or should be) a government mandated limited monopoly, designed to benefit society as a whole.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  15. Awesome! by Jeian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It pissed me off to no end when I got the original trilogy on DVD, and they'd replaced the ghost of the "old" Anakin Skywalker with the ghost of the "young" Anakin Skywalker at the end of RotJ.

  16. Region 1 only? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is this coming out on Region 2 as well? Ah bollocks who cares i'll just get a region 1 copy.

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  17. Star Wars Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay! And just in time for Star Wars Day!

    May the Fourth be with you. :-D

  18. WTF is next? Script-on-DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like, where Obi-Wan shoots first?

  19. No thanks by MemoryDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am still waiting for the Jar Jar Binks edition. The one where the movies are done as they were meant to be, with Luke being replaced by Jar Jar Binks.

    1. Re:No thanks by powerlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am still waiting for the Jar Jar Binks edition. The one where the movies are done as they were meant to be, with Luke being replaced by Jar Jar Binks.

      You know ... that actually might explain a lot of the plot twists and acting style.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:No thanks by datafr0g · · Score: 0

      Jar Jar: "Leia, Yoousee mesa Sister!"

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    3. Re:No thanks by aug24 · · Score: 1

      "Wesa Luke Skywalker. Wesa here to rescue you!"

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    4. Re:No thanks by Megane · · Score: 1

      Darth Vader: "Jar Jar, meesa you father!"

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:No thanks by gclef · · Score: 1

      Nonono. Jar Jar was meant to be Boba Fett, but Lucas chickened out. See, at the big lightsabre duel at the end of episode III, Jar Jar was supposed to fall in the lava, disfiguring him so totally that he needed the suit to survive, and tearing away any hint of cheer from his personality. But, by episode II, Lucas had decided that this tragic arc of JarJar to Boba was too distracting from the tragic arc of Anakin to Darth, so he left it out. (The fact that people were cheering when they read that scene of the script may have influenced the decision as well.)

    6. Re:No thanks by BJH · · Score: 1

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!1!11!!one!

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    7. Re:No thanks by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that ;-)

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    8. Re:No thanks by ukemike · · Score: 1

      But meesa goin to the Tashi station to getsa some bombad power converters!

      --
      -- QED
    9. Re:No thanks by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Meow Skywalker?

      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  20. But will it include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Star Wars TV Christmas specical?

    (Google it if you don't know what I'm talking about)

    1. Re:But will it include... by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Don't google for it. Don't.

      The above referenced item is something I have fought long and hard to excise from my memory, and to date I have not succeeded. I am considering a lobotomy.

  21. Why is this news again? by Darkn3ss · · Score: 1

    Everyone who wanted to own it probably bit the bullet and bought the re-re-re-re-release already. Lucas is just proving how stupid americans are. You CAN take multiple bites from the same consumer with the same product (or even a lesser one).

    1. Re:Why is this news again? by Jeian · · Score: 1

      Lucas is just proving how stupid americans are.

      I'd define "stupidity" as something closer to "inability to discuss a simple subject without insulting people of a specific race/country/ethnicity/etc."

      "americans" should be capitalized, by the way.

    2. Re:Why is this news again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't deserve a capital letter.

    3. Re:Why is this news again? by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Multiple bites? I didn't buy any other releases of this, other than the pre-SE VHS of IV and V. I will buy this, because it is the product that I want. I saw that everyone was bitching about the special edition, re-releses, and so forth, and figured Lucas would see the money-making opportunity and exploit it. I was right, and I can buy this without feeling like a chump, since he is only getting my money from one DVD release.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    4. Re:Why is this news again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which are you, french or muslim?

    5. Re:Why is this news again? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I know a number of people at work who would buy it who didn't buy the special edition DVDs. For awhile it was popular to pass around homemade DVDs created from the Laserdisc version.

    6. Re:Why is this news again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You followed the same plan I did. I wasn't going to buy the DVDs because they weren't what I wanted. Now, I can get what I want. I win. Plan B was to buy an LD player and the laserdiscs OR get a divx of an LD copy. I was just too lazy to follow through with plan B.

    7. Re:Why is this news again? by Darkn3ss · · Score: 1

      I will capitalize a country's name if they deserve respect. I will do the same with a persons name if they deserve respect. Americans (look, it was capitalized, but only because it was the first word of a sentence) do not deserve respect after voting for bush twice...

  22. what happend with VHS? by jorgeu · · Score: 1

    obsolete? ;)

  23. I was so waiting for this news story! by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just so I could say "May the 4th be with you".

    *drumroll* *cymbals*

    Thank you, thank you, try the lobster.

    1. Re:I was so waiting for this news story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I also liked "revenge of the 5th" exthept for all theh thpesical effecth...

    2. Re:I was so waiting for this news story! by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Posted on Friday May 05, @12:16AM. You fail it. ;-)

    3. Re:I was so waiting for this news story! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      "It's a trap!"

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:I was so waiting for this news story! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Depends on your time-zone. Right now, it's still the 4th around the Pacific.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:I was so waiting for this news story! by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      "by forgotten_my_nick (802929) on Thursday May 04, @12:16PM (#15261203)"

      for yous in the other timezone you can have "Revenge of the 5th".

    6. Re:I was so waiting for this news story! by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Aha. I presumed the date shown on /. were the date at the servers, not local timezones. My bad. :-)

  24. Maybe we'll all be blessed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..when they introduce the "Star Wars Christmas Special" on DVD, so we can see it in all it's intended glory.

    All hail the Lucas empire!

  25. I felt a great disturbance in the Force... by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 5, Funny

    as if millions of hells had frozen over and were suddenly silenced.

  26. Attractively priced? by ksheka · · Score: 1

    Attractive to who?

    --
    alias uptime="echo '5:33pm up 22342352324 days, 6:28, 2124315623 users, load average: 2432.40, 12312.31, 123123.19'"
    1. Re:Attractively priced? by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      lucasfilm

  27. Nice to see by MImeKillEr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nice to see that they're relasing the original versions in the same boxes. Now I can show my kids the versions I saw, and not the "digitally enhanced" (read:bastardized) versions where they cut/rearranged scenes.

    See http://www.dvdactive.com/editorial/articles/star-w ars-the-changes-part-one.html for a listing of the changes between thr original Star Wars and the 2004 "digitally enhanced" version. No doubt, the DVD release will match those of 2004.

    I imagine he's bastardized Empire and Jedi as well.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:Nice to see by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just be sure to keep the remastered versions that come with them in a locked box where the kids can't reach.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    2. Re:Nice to see by szembek · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that link, I was just about to post a request for such information. I don't know if I've seen any of the remastered versions.

      --
      nothing
    3. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a similar link for those of us who hate IE and do not like Opera? /G

    4. Re:Nice to see by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "Nice to see that they're relasing the original versions in the same boxes. Now I can show my kids the versions I saw, and not the "digitally enhanced" (read:bastardized) versions where they cut/rearranged scenes."

      To which your kids will likely say "Hey Dad, this movie sucks! Look at the special effects, what crap! Where is my Harry Potter video??"

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    5. Re:Nice to see by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Your kids might not care.

      in fact, it's highly probable they'll think you're insane for getting worked up over a few changes.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    6. Re:Nice to see by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

      Yes, so your kids can look at you funny and wonder what dad is acting so crazy about. I prefer the originals too, but I haven't met anyone under 30 that gives a rip which version they watch: Originals or SEs. The changes just aren't a big deal to them. I've stopped trying to convince anyone else. I don't think the originals are "better" than the SEs. They're just the versions I prefer. When the discs come out, I'll take the SEs off the self and put them in the closet. In fact, I think I'll stick the prequels in there with them, since I don't watch those, either.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    7. Re:Nice to see by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      ...listing of the changes between thr original Star Wars and the 2004 "digitally enhanced" version.

      Well, actually Lucas was fiddling with it during the very first release, well before the special editions. My wife saw the original "Star Wars" (not "A New Hope") in the theater more than 100 times (yeah, she's almost as big a geek as me). There were two versions during that release. Her pet peeve was that they re-dubbed the actress who played Luke's aunt. The first version had the real actress' voice and the later release had...someone else's. And, the very first version had the audio from the other ships during the attack on the Death Star that sounded reasonably clear. Only in the later release was the "flanging" effect added. She's always thought that was pretty stupid. They have faster-than-light travel, but can't make a decent ship-to-ship radio?

      Anyway, she gets quite worked up about this. I saw it in the theater first run as well, but some 90 times less than her.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  28. RTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can understand not reading the article, but at least read the fookin summary man:

    Each release includes the 2004 digitally remastered version of the movie, as well as the original theatrical edition of the film

    1. Re:RTFS by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I get confused. If it includes the 2004, does that mean it includes Han shooting first (theatrical) or Han shooting simultaneously (DVD release)?

      IIRC, in the original version (also included), Greedo doesn't get a shot off.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  29. Proper music! by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    Hurrah! Now I can once again enjoy the ending of The Return of the Jedi with the proper, original, Ewok music. That really rocked compared to the wishy washy tat that replaced it.

    Altogether now.. dah, dah! dada da dah!

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Proper music! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yub Yub!

  30. We saw this coming, right? by sdo1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Come on. Let's not kid ourselves. As much as George likes to pretend he's taking the high ground and being true to his artistic vision (which annoyed me, but at least I could respect), we all knew this would come down to $$$$. In the grand scheme, it's a trivial amount of work to get these DVDs ready to go and the cost of production is trivial. This decision will bring in millions upon millions of dollars into Lucasfilm and there's no way they could turn that down.

    It has nothing to do with the pressure we collectively put on them. It has nothing to do with George caving on his desire to keep tweaking his movies.

    It has to do with bringing in more moolah. Just keep milking the cash cow.

    Um... and I... um.... well... I'll probably be first in line to squeeze the teet.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:We saw this coming, right? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Agree 100%.

      Which is why, someday, Disney will even re-relese Song of the South. There will be a bad quarter (or two, or three), they'll put the necessary caveats and warnings infront (e.g. do not seriously consider these historic portrayals, etc) and release it as a collector's edition for adults.

      At some point, the money is just too good. In recent years, even impossible-to-get movies like The Passenger have been re-released. The profit motive rules all.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:We saw this coming, right? by Nugget · · Score: 1

      And once you've bought this set, the rumors about the HD-DVD and/or BluRay release will begin.

    3. Re:We saw this coming, right? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Yah, but still can't buy Phantasm I/II/III in the US. Can buy Phantasm IV however. Over in the UK, you can get all four inside one of the floating silver spheres, but not a damn thing here in the US.

    4. Re:We saw this coming, right? by clontzman · · Score: 1

      Did they yank them off the market? I bought Phantasm 1 several years ago in a U.S. edition.

    5. Re:We saw this coming, right? by thepotoo · · Score: 1
      I'll probably be first in line to squeeze the teet.

      Um, this is slashdot. You won't be squeezing any teets. Ever. Sorry.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
  31. Lucas is a genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its incredible how these guys sell the same stuff again and again.
    I am glad I did not buy it before. But I'll surely get these versions.

  32. No need to cry .... by aepervius · · Score: 1

    ...over spilled milk. by now you should have long understood that a rewrite or new version of SW new ep 1-3 only belong to fantasy. frankly personaly re-release leave me cld. I would rather have new films like sequels.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:No need to cry .... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Funny

      No need to cry ...over spilled milk.

      Pfft. I only cry over spilled blue milk.

  33. YHBT (by the TV) HAND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Seriously, I remember seeing TV ads for episodes 4-6 before the remastered edition came out saying "Last Chance to buy the trilogy." This was a lie then (as we got the remastered trilogy) and a bigger lie now.

    This is why I don't bother to watch television: it's full of lies, and most of the lies are much more subtle than the one you mention. Television transmits the ideologies about strength (jocks not nerds), beauty (blonde not black), and goodness (rich not poor) all the while selling you things you probably would be better off without.

    And if I were to watch television, you can be damn sure I'm not going take an ad at face value.

  34. Pressure? by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

    This had nothing to do with pressure from the fans. As always, Lucas saw a way to make another buck and jumped at it.

    1. Re:Pressure? by Comboman · · Score: 1

      I'd like to think the fans had something to do with it http://www.originaltrilogy.com/. Of course, the many fan-produced DVD transfers of the laser disc version floating around the net could also have something to do with it as well.

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  35. Pricing and the MPAA by zaguar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are "attractively priced" at $200 so the MPAA can recoup the losses that occur when someone who buys the set makes a copy of each disk for individual usage, at 6 disks, $35 for each disk (conservative estimate by the MPAA), they lose $210 (What does the MPAA expect? A user to buy 2 copies?). The MPAA, in their generosity and wisdom, is prepared to accept losing $10 per sale, hence the price of $200

    --
    "Sure there's porn and piracy on the Web but there's probably a downside too."
  36. This was Palpatine's idea by sg3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I, for one, am happy with the remastered, remixed, redone versions. In fact, I think that Lucas should make even more random changes in the next versions. Like changing it so that when Itchy plays Scratchy's rib twice in succession, it makes three different tones!

    However, if Lucas wants to put out new DVDs, more power to him. However, you know what's funny? Sure, Lucas is releasing DVDs that have the original uncut versions of the OT on them. But note:

    Each release includes the 2004 digitally remastered version of the movie and, as bonus material, the theatrical edition of the film.

    If you absolutely have to have the original versions, you have to buy the Special Editions to get them. So if you've already bought the DVD collection, you get to buy it again. So the "OMG!!1! HAN DIDN'T SHOOT FIRST?? I'M SO BUMMED!!" crowd get to buy the version they hate *twice*.

    Sure, those consumers will put the other versions up for sale on Ebay as fast as possible. But by the time they sell, the Bluray/HD-DVD version comes out.

    The circle is now complete!
    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    1. Re:This was Palpatine's idea by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Wow. I'm glad I never bought the remastered edition, then!

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
  37. All is well by Donut2099 · · Score: 1

    The cycle of profit continues. And with extended copyright, Lucas' grandchildren can continue to re-release the same movies well into the next century.

  38. Next-gen DVD by The+Madd+Rapper · · Score: 1

    So did people who bought the 2004 DVDs going to buy it now then buy it again when it comes out on Blu-ray? For me it's worth the wait. But as others noted, Lucas is practically printing himself money.

    --
    That's the shit that feds me up
    1. Re:Next-gen DVD by PunkPig · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I thought. It is basically his last chance to release it on regular DVD..... to then relase it in a few years in HDDVD/Blueray. Yay money!

  39. Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by trellick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Personally ( and I know I might be in the minority here) I preferred the original theatrical release to the 'Director's Cut'.

    Mr Scott I have a lot of time for - but in this case, I have to disagree.

    1. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by iainl · · Score: 2, Informative

      A 3-version box of Blade Runner has been prepped by Warners (Theatrical, "Director's Cut" and an actual new cut by Ridley, rather than what was basically a workprint) for years now. But it's up to its proverbial neck in a legal quagmire, with no sign of a release. At this rate, I doubt it will appear on DVD at all, but make the jump to the next format.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      You're not in minority as far as I'm concerned. The Director's cut is bad, really bad. The new ending just ruined the whole atmosphere (along with all the other changed stuff).

    3. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know how right you are. The voice over added so much to that world. I've seen the released version (with the voice overs) and loved it. The first time my wife saw it, it was the re-released DVD without the voice overs. She was lost in the movie.

      Yes, I wish they would release the original on DVD. Sad thing is, I had it on LaserDisc, but my LaserDisc player broke and it was going to cost a forturne to repair it. So I sold the LaserDisc on E-bay. That was a sad day.

    4. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

      bah, the voice-overs were unnecessary, unless you were a complete moron who couldn't follow along without them, in which case you'll barely understand the meaning of the movie even with that much spoon-feeding anyway. The movie is far better without them, the mood carries across much better, among other things. They weren't supposed to be in there in the first place, they were only added because of pressure from moronic higher-ups who couldn't pay attention for more than a minute and follow the story. They aren't needed, and the movie has a much better, and intended, feel without them. I don't know how anyone could like the version with the voice-overs. But, I also don't know how anyone can like a TV show like CSI, but look how successful it is. Every episode of CSI: present mystery...present ending/answer very obviously several times while pretending as though you're only giving vague clues...present ending as though it is a huge surprise that you didn't already give away several times so the extremely retarded viewer thinks he figured it out. So insulting. Yet insanely popular. Go figure. While not exactly what the voice-overs in Blade Runner are doing, it's still another example of completely unnecessarily going overboard with narration/description. Since when did condescension become the welcome norm?

    5. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by Hungry+Admin · · Score: 1

      While I do enjoy listening to Homer Simpson having a conversation with his brain, that sort of thing is out of place in a movie like Blade Runner.

      Homer (thinking): "Okay, brain, I don't like you and you don't like me. Let's just take this exam so I can get back to killing you with beer."

      Homer's brain: "It's a DEAL!"

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because the people who mind don't matter, and the people who matter don't mind.
    6. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      Wow. How can you stand the first person narrative?

    7. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by pianophile · · Score: 1

      I preferred the original theatrical release

      I agree completely. The voiceovers, the happy ending, it's all good.

      Why? Because this is the version I saw and loved in '82. This is the version that became the cult video hit during the '80s. People complain about trivia like voiceovers, but if it weren't for the popularity of the original version, flaws and all, there would have been no Director's Cut(s), no talk of anniversary re-releases, etc. The original, un-fussed-with theatrical release is the only version that matters, IMHO.

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
    8. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      to me the voice overs gave it a more Film Noir type feel... Not necessary for the plot exactly, but giving the scenes some more atmosphere...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    9. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by wdawson · · Score: 0

      According to this page, there seems to be a good chance that what you're after will be available on DVD next year. Also, the director's cut that was released wasn't exactly true to it's description, and a "better director's cut" is to also be released with this collection.

    10. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original theatrical cut was released in Europe, and a DVD-R of it may be available on a major bittorrent site... not that I know for a fact it's there because I downloaded it or anything *COUGH*

      You know, after years of watching the Director's cut and thinking "Man the original theatrical cut was better" - I watched the original, and it's really not. Harrison Ford's narration is really half-assed (I don't know why I didn't remember that) and kind of spoils things, really. It's also not much less confusing - whenever I would show people the movie for the first time, I would always wish I had the original theatrical cut because people never seem to really understand the film if I show them the Director's Cut.

      Anyway. Yeah. Bittorrent.

  40. Dupe? by LoonyMike · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is this a regular ./ dupe, or did they actually release yet another edition?

  41. I'll buy that by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    but only if it comes as an interactive movie, and you get a blaster and a light sabre to creatively redesign Jar Jar's appearance.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  42. Re:Thank God for that by gadlaw · · Score: 1

    What he said. Now I'll actually buy the thing. I didn't buy the one they have out now since it's not Star Wars as I saw it. It's nice to have cooler explosions and all of that but it's not what I remember. It's not Star Wars and so it never got a penny of my money. About freaking time. Lucas would have been a fine tin horn dictator with his 'my way or the highway' mentality. Fortunately he's not that dictator and only lord over a few movies. It's stupid and arrogant of him to have tried to keep the original from us and it will forever leave a bad taste in my mouth.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  43. Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not possible to "enjoy Star Wars as it first appeared in 1977."

    Watching a DVD is NOT the same as watching projected film on a screen in a theatre.

    But the big problem is, I don't know of any safe way to erase, then subsequently restore, my memories of the past couple of decades so that I can see the film knowing nothing about the movie except a Time magazine review and a friend saying it was great.

    How can I watch the 1977 Star Wars without the burden of twenty-nine-years'-worth of accumulated "spoilers?."

    1. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by thryllkill · · Score: 0

      "How can I watch the 1977 Star Wars without the burden of twenty-nine-years'-worth of accumulated 'spoilers?.'"

      Drugs man, drugs.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

      "But the big problem is, I don't know of any safe way to erase, then subsequently restore, my memories of the past couple of decades "

      I just had a Slashdot moment.

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    3. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by maximthemagnificent · · Score: 1

      Spoilers? Spoiling what? The amazing plot twists? Like everyone being related? Oh please. Space opera. Better than Star Trek, but then what isn't?

    4. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by FurryFeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do what I did. Have a kid and raise him until he's around 8-9 years old. Get the original trilogy in DVD. Sit down on a Sunday afternoon and watch it with him. Relive the moment.

      Granted, my boy is only two right now, so my plan won't come to fruition for a few more years. Also, I don't know what to do whith the kid afterwards. Oh, those pesky details.

    5. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Do what I did. Have a kid and

      Whhhaaa... *head explodes!*

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      As it first appeared in 1977, I started crying halfway through and my mom had to carry me out. Of course I was like 7 months old...

      Few fans still remember a world without Star Wars. A copy of the Star Wars we grew up with is good enough.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    7. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1
      How can I watch the 1977 Star Wars without the burden of twenty-nine-years'-worth of accumulated "spoilers?."

      Watch it with a child who has never before seen it.

    8. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Try alcohol.
      After a while you'll only have a partial memory, and you'll build illogical bridges across the gaps. So the friend of yours in casu would have worked with Time Magazine, and you told him the film was great, upon which he built his review. You also once met Lucas, back when he was poor, and that time he wasn't fat, but an amiable feller who liked Guinness just as you.
      Then he made a movie and was rich. But he became rich before the movie, since the movie was finally released this year.

    9. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by Khomar · · Score: 1
      Watching a DVD is NOT the same as watching projected film on a screen in a theatre.

      No, it is better. I recently purchased a digital projector with component video, invited a bunch of friends over, made some popcorn and grabbed a pop from my fridge, and watched "The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe" on my 10 ft wide screen in my basement. I got to watch the movie with a crowd of people I knew and liked who didn't talk incessently during the movie. The picture was better than theater quality (no defects in the film), and I was able to control the volume. I was also able to choose the time and date for watching the film. I don't think I will ever go to a movie theater again.

      And now with the original Star Wars available... it might just be time for another viewing. :-)

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    10. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      It's not possible to "enjoy Star Wars as it first appeared in 1977."

      It certainly is. I do it in my memories. I will never forget the theatre audience cheering and applauding the movie. Or the fact that it was still playing in that same theater to good crowds a year after the original release.

    11. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I'm sure his little hands will be big enough to work one of the sewing machines in my basement. BTW, I babysit dirt cheap.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    12. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by macshome · · Score: 1

      My five year old daughter has been enjoying my copy of the Definitive Collection on LD with me. She's never seen the "Special" editions.

      And yes, there isn't much better than having your kids want to watch Star Wars and play video games with you.

    13. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 1

      8-9? By the time I was three years old I must have watched Star Wars 50 times. Granted I usually skipped to the Battle of Yavin and just watched that.

    14. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get nothing out of the movies? I mean, come on. It's right there in front of you.

      Send him to live with distant relatives. Then go take over the univesre. (Hope he doesn't try to come after you later.)

  44. So much for LD... by no_such_user · · Score: 1

    I suppose this means I can finally retire my laserdisc player. *sniff*... watching a movie just isn't the same anymore without the whirrrr of a 12" disc spinning.

  45. I can see it now . . . by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    Everyone complaining that "Han shot first" is doing the happy dance from the original end of Jedi.

  46. Don't get too proud of this technological terror by mrshowtime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lucas is essentially releasing a high grade dvd bootleg of the Uber 1993 Laserdisc release. The picture quality will be 1993 and the sound 2.0 stereo AND you still have to essentially re-buy the crappy 2004 release which comes in the same set. Lucas is such a cock. I know damn well he has perfect, unaltered, un-CGI'ed, versions of Star Wars; he has to have them. But, instead, he is pretending that they were somehow destroyed.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  47. Lucas' Holiday by mgblst · · Score: 1

    In other news, George Lucas returns from his holiday on December 31st.
     
    Any ideas on why the limited release?

    1. Re:Lucas' Holiday by iainl · · Score: 1

      Why? So those of us who don't feel a big rush to get this, on account of our laserdisc players still working, will feel pressured into getting them 'just in case'.

      On the other hand, now he's demonstrated his ability to give in on the issue, I'll be trying to hold off until I ineviatably buy them all over again on a high-def format.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  48. I want the ultra configurable version by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    Options:

    Han shoots first.
    Greedo shoots first.
    Both shoot at the same time.
    Greedo doesn't shoot.
    Han doesn't shoot. Greedo accidentally shoots himself.
    Nobody shoots. Greedo declares the life of a rogue is not for him, and goes off to enjoy the sunshine
    Jabba shoots first.

    1. Re:I want the ultra configurable version by warkda+rrior · · Score: 2, Funny

      When does Cowboy Neal shoot?

      --
      You need to install an RTFM interface.
    2. Re:I want the ultra configurable version by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Greedo admits his feelings to Han.

    3. Re:I want the ultra configurable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the option: Jar Jar falls on his ass and frickin lasers shoot out of it, blowing Greedo's head to pieces.

    4. Re:I want the ultra configurable version by 01101101 · · Score: 1

      Well now that you can play DVD's on most game consoles, they might as well make a version where you can use a light gun and shoot Greedo yourself. I'd buy that one.

    5. Re:I want the ultra configurable version by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      If you want Luke to join his father, turn to page 149.

      If you want Luke to jump off the ledge, turn to page 220.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    6. Re:I want the ultra configurable version by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

      How about, pop the DVD in your PS2 and use the game controller to make Han Solo dodge laser blasts - using the same advanced photographic manipulation algorithms used in the Special Edition, only now rendered in real-time thanks to the awesome power of the Emotion Engine.

      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
    7. Re:I want the ultra configurable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the Oliver Stone version where a faint puff of smoke appears from the nearby grassy knoll?
      And the version where Greedo pulls out two swords and makes an impressive display of whirling around before Han shoots him?

    8. Re:I want the ultra configurable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you want to turn Star Wars into the movie Clue... I like it!

    9. Re:I want the ultra configurable version by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'd pay extra if there was a menu option that would skip over the Ewoks entirely...

      Not to mention the original scrolling text in the theatrical release, and opening scene.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  49. This is great. by fixinah · · Score: 1

    Now you starwards-nerds can put yet another shitty collection of discs into your moms basement but do make sure to leave room for hd-dvd and blu-ray versions that will be hitting the market as soon as the sales for this collection of POS starts going down.

  50. and there was much rejoicing... by Churla · · Score: 1

    We had both the original VHS release , and the widescreen reworked release in my house. Both on VHS.

    My wife and I agreed that the prequels were such tripe that they were not worth buying. We had a reasonably new dog in the house. The original cut VHS tapes were a victim of that dogs house training phase, and it almost killed the dog. (Not eating the tapes, but my wifes reaction and near murderous rampage when seeing them destroyed)

    Now I will have something to put in her stocking for xmas and unfortunately give Lucas money in the process. Also, we will have truely educational and non watered down versions to show our yet to be born kids. (Same reason I have School House Rock on DVD with the unmolested "manifest destiny" track)

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  51. Halelujah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you so much 20th Century Fox and Mr. Lucas :*)

  52. Huh? by gentimjs · · Score: 1

    You mean to tell me Obi-Wan doesnt shoot first?
    WTF?!

  53. The Dukes of Hazzard? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny
    Since this is coming from a user with the ID "the_duke_of_hazzard," I don't think you're in any position to complain about plot.

    The Dukes of Hazzard had the worst cookie cutter plot lines ever. From the above link:
    The plot of a Dukes Of Hazzard episode is the least essential part of the script. Be creative in the structure of your episode, but adhere to the following rule: If the question "Is this the episode where Boss Hogg comes up with a crazy scheme to put the Dukes in jail or swindle honest folk, but in the end is foiled in part due to his own stupidity?" doesn't apply to your episode, you've got to go back to the drawing board. Remember: there is no "very special episode" where Uncle Jesse reveals that he can't read, or the Dukes learn a special lesson about teenage pregnancy. A "very special episode" of Dukes Of Hazzard is one that features the Oak Ridge Boys.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Dukes of Hazzard? by the_duke_of_hazzard · · Score: 2, Funny

      How very dare you! My PhD was in existential motifs in Dukes of Hazzard sub-plots. Those Duke boys never did mean no harm.

    2. Re:The Dukes of Hazzard? by Rakarra · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Remember: there is no "very special episode" where Uncle Jesse reveals that he can't read, or the Dukes learn a special lesson about teenage pregnancy. A "very special episode" of Dukes Of Hazzard is one that features the Oak Ridge Boys.

      Honestly this is probably one of the Dukes of Hazzard's few strengths. Those "very special episodes" almost always fall flat in most dramatic shows, and especially fall flat in comedies. They're generally worthless, don't make you feel empathy for the characters, and too often involve blatant heartstrings-manipulation.

    3. Re:The Dukes of Hazzard? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Wow, that sure was a long-winded way of saying, "Bad guys come to town."

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  54. Twenty-nine years of forgotten spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How can I watch the 1977 Star Wars without the burden of twenty-nine-years'-worth of accumulated "spoilers?.""

    alzheimer's

  55. Since different releases are included. by antdude · · Score: 1

    Does this mean it will be using DVD's branching technology or will there actual separate movies on these two DVDs?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Since different releases are included. by tuffy · · Score: 1

      It sounds like seperate movies on each disc. Realistically, there isn't any other way to do it. The Special Editions are color-corrected differently than the Originals and have far too many changes (both small and large, including music cues) to make a branching version feasible.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  56. About time! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Wow. This is the only good news I've heard from the Ranch in over a decade.

    I just hope the theatrical releases are the cleaned-up and re-mastered versions they made in the mid-nineties. And I hope they're wide-screen!

    I don't complain about Lucas printing money. --Aside from movie tickets and a bunch of plastic toys I bought when I was seven years old, I've not paid money for a Lucasfilm product since the Young Indiana Jones tapes came out. --Though, they were dissappointing. They were dumbed down with the Old Indy clips which held the stories together cut out. Silly.

    I hope the DVD's don't suck. I'll wait for reviews before I buy. I still love Star Wars; I think it's a great story with an important message. I guess in the war of light and dark, such gambits as putting out a film, (like the last three), are going to be prone to attacks. --You can't have a cohesive message getting through! Might cause people to think a bit too much. Better to fry Lucas's brain from a distance with government rays or something. (I wouldn't put it past them. . .)


    -FL

    1. Re:About time! by Half+a+dent · · Score: 1

      Yep, Lucas will sell this edition on DVD to wring some more money from us before HD-DVD/Blu Ray take hold. Then "only ever" release the updated versions on HD/BR - until that income stream starts to dry up of course, then the unedited HD version... You all know the rest.

    2. Re:About time! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      Yep, Lucas will sell this edition on DVD to wring some more money from us before HD-DVD/Blu Ray take hold. Then "only ever" release the updated versions on HD/BR - until that income stream starts to dry up of course, then the unedited HD version... You all know the rest.

      Yeah, but once I have a DVD copy in my hands, I probably won't need another copy ever again. DIY computers are handy that way.


      -FL

  57. But I thought.... by cvd6262 · · Score: 4, Informative

    AP: Why not release both the originals and special editions on DVD?

    Lucas: The special edition, that's the one I wanted out there. The other movie, it's on VHS, if anybody wants it. ... I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore.

    Source (9/15/2004)

    --

    I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    1. Re:But I thought.... by jridley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well hell, if it doesn't exist, then he shouldn't mind if I make a few hundred copies and hand them out at conventions.
      As far as I can tell, the original trilogy had been the subject of more "labor of love" really well done fan DVD sets than anything else I can think of. I personally have three different DVD sets, all well done, some with nice extras and good menus.

      Honestly, I've already bought the original trilogy at least 3 times, once on CED videodisc (!), once on VHS, then again on VHS special edition (I recently put that box set on a "freebies" table at a convention and nobody took it). I'd probably buy the original series on DVD, but I'm not buying a combo original+SE copy; I wouldn't want anyone to think that I actually bought it because of the SE.

    2. Re:But I thought.... by Coldfinger · · Score: 1

      The ability to deny the existence of a movie is insignifcant next to the profitability of making all the fans buy the trilogy again for the fifth time.

    3. Re:But I thought.... by m50d · · Score: 2, Interesting
      to me, it doesn't really exist anymore.

      He's not saying it actually doesn't exist. He's saying he doesn't give a fuck about it. And you'll notice he's not promoting it. Seems the studio feels different. No contradiction.

      --
      I am trolling
    4. Re:But I thought.... by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 1

      You are a GOD.

      --
      My mom says I'm cool.
    5. Re:But I thought.... by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      I'm not buying a combo original+SE copy; I wouldn't want anyone to think that I actually bought it because of the SE.

      But if sales aren't good enough, they'll say: "See! Nobody wants that old junk any more -- we're never releasing again!"

  58. In response to overwhelming demand... by DrXym · · Score: 1

    ... Lucasfilm have just reissued Star Wars in another format YET AGAIN. George Lucas was seen to be crying all the way to the bank.

  59. thats' the worst idea since greedo shooting first! by everphilski · · Score: 1

    In the bar scene on Tatooine Han shot Greedo first in the original.

    In the remasters, Greedo shot Han first.

    Might not seem like much but some people made a big fuss about it (Holden McNeill in Kevin Smith's Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back says, "That's the worst idea since 'Greedo shooting first' ").

    Some other people aren't huge fans of some of the other edits but that's the big one

  60. What about Biggs at the beginning? by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know that the scenes were filmed, and I seem to remember seeing the scenes with Luke's friends in Anchorhead, where Biggs told him he was joining the rebellion (leaving Luke behind on Tattooine). Sure, it's 29 years ago, and I was only nine years old at the time, but I can still remember later reports saying that it was in the original theater release (and the first victim of George's redacting desires). It was one of those things that Lucas didn't want to do, but added because he was told just having the 'droids would remind people of THX 1138 in a bad way.

    I personally liked the scenes. It made it easier for the audience to feel Luke's feeling of being left behind while important things happened Elsewhere, and made Bigg's death in the trench more painful.

    1. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful, there are people who will jump at you and tell you that "you imagined seeing it" because it allegedly never left the cutting-room floor. Yes, the Star Wars picture book had images of the scene, but I too remember SEEING IT IN THE THEATRE back in 1977.

      Anytime I bring it up, people accuse me of "imaginging" it because it's "impossible." But I do remember it.

    3. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember at the beginning of Empire seeing a hooded man in Ben's hut working on something. They then waved and R2 turned up. The next scene was 3P0 and R2 going along to Jabba's palace.

      The reason I remember it is because I thought that the figure was Ben leaving something for Luke. When the lightsaber shot out of R2, I realised it was Luke made to look like Ben.

      Anyone else remember this?

    4. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Since this is a retro edition on DVD, you may just have figured out the accompanying DVD bonus content. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by MauMan · · Score: 1

      You stop that! I saw an interview with George Lucas where he said that scene was never even filmed much less was ever in any version of the film.

      It cannot exist! Stop posted evidence to the contrary!

      --
      ------- Code to try when you're bored: qsort( 0, UINT_MAX, sizeof( int* ), IntCompare );
    6. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by querist · · Score: 1

      Ah, you have also felt that disturbance in the Force.

      You too, my friend, saw the original R rated version (violence). The original verison in which my uncle went with me to the theatre during the day so I, as a 10 year old, could go see it.

      They stripped out a few scenes (including some slightly nastier scenes in the cantina) to bring it down to PG.

      Somehow, I doubt the DVDs will be the original, R rated version.

    7. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Loiosh-de-Taltos · · Score: 1
    8. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      This brings up a good point. There are several theatrical releases of Star Wars from a content perspective. You can check them some of the differences on IMDB. I thought I was crazy for years because I swore that Star Wars didn't have an "Episode IV" designation on it when I saw it in the theater. Turns out I was right. I don't remember the Biggs scene though.

    9. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I saw it about a half dozen times that summer and never saw that scene. In fact I just saw it for the first time on youtube today. It obviously was filmed, and I wouldn't be surprised if some audiences saw it. Remember, back then they used to do public screenings ahead of the official release of films and do additional edits based on audience feedback before the official release. Could you have seen one of those screenings, or perhaps seen a bootleg from one of those screenings sometime since then which included the scene?

    10. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Jabba had a palace on Hoth? Or did you mean Return of the Jedi?

    11. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Stuff like that makes you wonder just how much extra material was shot that never made it in...

      For all three of the original movies, there could be over an hour of stuff.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    12. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by jafac · · Score: 1

      I know that the scenes were filmed, and I seem to remember seeing the scenes with Luke's friends in Anchorhead, where Biggs told him he was joining the rebellion (leaving Luke behind on Tattooine).

      It's in the Howard Chaykin comic book version.

      God I'm such a geek.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    13. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by jafac · · Score: 1

      They stripped out a few scenes (including some slightly nastier scenes in the cantina) to bring it down to PG.

      Like the one where Han feels up a three-breasted whore?

      No wait - I'm thinking of another movie, aren't I?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    14. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by anticypher · · Score: 1

      The earlier Biggs scene was certainly in the version shown in San Francisco during the first week of release, because I remember seeing it. When I saw star wars later in the summer in another market (maybe San Diego), the Biggs scene was cut. I remember noting a few changes at the time, but close to 30 years has dimmed those memories. Watching the youtube clips does bring back memories of that bar scene.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    15. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man that made my day. thanks anonymous c!

    16. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bum. Aye, sorry.

    17. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Wow. Thanks a million. I'm absolutely baffled to finally see this. Thank you thank you!

    18. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was NEVER an R-rated version of the movie. In fact the movie's original rating was G. Lucas/Fox resubmitted the movie to the MPAA pointing out the mature themes that were in play in an effort to get the rating pushed up to PG from G, not down from R to PG. Fox and Lucas knew a G rating would kill an chance they had of recouping any money on the project since it would be percieved as a "kiddie movie".

      And, by the way, obviously the early Biggs scenes were shot, despite Lucas' affirmation's to the contrary, but they NEVER appeared in any "theatrical release cut" of the movie. Friends of mine who had a unique opportunity to see a pre-release cut (by virtue of having a father who was part of Fox's marketing department) insisted it WAS present in that pre-release.

    19. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Arandir · · Score: 1

      I remember that one too. I so it on the west coast, and everyone I know who remembers seeing it, saw it on the west coast. Were there more than one master print? Was it edited out before it reached the rest of the world?

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    20. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      Very cool, never saw that scene, and I saw Star Wars about a month after it was released.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    21. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      Why the hell was that scene deleted? Its not very long and it ties in perfectly with a bunch of other scenes.

      I've always wondered why luke wanted to join the academy. Why would he want to join the imperials? Now I realise that he was really looking to get contacts in the rebellion. It makes a lot more sense.

      Also, I always thought of Owen Lars as a Republic soldier who was disillusioned after the clone wars. Biggs saying that he could "hold off a whole colony of sand people with one blaster" kinda confirms that.

      Thanks for the link.

  61. 30 Years From Now by berenixium · · Score: 0

    Classic and Remastered together again... but with different cover art. SW is the Pepsi of SciFi - The choice of a (new) generation. :)

  62. Copyright - an honest question by XanC · · Score: 1

    If the Star Wars films were in the public domain by now, as it could easily be argued they "should" be, according to the original idea of copyright law, would we ever see releases on new and better formats?

    1. Re:Copyright - an honest question by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If the Star Wars films were in the public domain by now, as it could easily be argued they "should" be, according to the original idea of copyright law, would we ever see releases on new and better formats?

      Of course you would. You can buy DVDs of Charlie Chaplin's early comedies, which are in the public domain. At a bookshop you will find beautiful editions of many books in the public domain (eg, Shakespeare, Dickens, Melville...). The whole point of the public domain is that anyone can reuse them.

    2. Re:Copyright - an honest question by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If the Star Wars films were in the public domain by now, as it could easily be argued they "should" be, according to the original idea of copyright law, would we ever see releases on new and better formats?

      If Star War films were in the public domain, anyone who cared to could go through them frame by frame, cleaning up every last goof and sharpening the darn thing to ultra-high definition with modern filtering programs and polishing the results by hand while someone else worked on sound. Since SW is as popular as it is, several people propably would. So yes, you would by new and better versions, in all likely much better than anything available now.

      Hell, if SW was in public domain, anyone who wanted could make their own version of Ep1-3, as long as they didn't use material from "official" versions. Oh, and Lucas would have to be making new movies instead of rereleasing the same movies in new formats every few years. His movies would also face competition from "unofficial" versions, and thus would have to be made much better.

      More stuff cheaper and with better quality, that's what a world without copyrights (or a short copyright) would have. We really need to get rid of the damn thing. The Pirate Bay is a good start. Not that I'm advocating anyone to do anything illegal, and am only giving the link so that you know to avoid the place where you can get stuff for free.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  63. Boss Nass as Vader by miller701 · · Score: 1

    Now that would be funny: Boss Nass as Vader! And after he says the line he shakes his jowels and makes the "Bluh Bluh Bluh BLuh Bluh Bluh" sound. That, I would pay money for.

    1. Re:Boss Nass as Vader by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're the perfect match for Lucas' target audience. ;-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Boss Nass as Vader by miller701 · · Score: 1

      Maybe I shouldn't give George any ideas.

  64. Has Hell Frozen Over? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Wow, I never thought I'd see the day. Glad I "boycotted" the Special Edition DVD release - I'm sure I'll be snapping this version up when it is released. I guess money won out over Lucases claims that that he would never, ever, ever release the original version since the new (crappier) version was now the definitive Star Wars.

  65. Next-gen DVD-Patience, young skywalker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So did people who bought the 2004 DVDs going to buy it now then buy it again when it comes out on Blu-ray? For me it's worth the wait. But as others noted, Lucas is practically printing himself money."

    *sigh*

    1-Nothing made people buy those versions. In fact most knew the released versions were different and bought anyway. (I find it funny that the only ones not bitching are LD owners).

    2-There are parallels with this situation and video cards. If you are waiting for the card with the Final Fantasy rendering capability? You'll end up with no video card for many years. In other words, there will alays be something new on the horizon, but you have to make decisions based on NOW! Not on what might be done many years down the line. In the mean time enjoy your present-day purchases.*

    *Here's your word for today: Patience (aka the opposite of "instant gratification")

  66. And for those Ewok-haters among us by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    ...the third box (supposedly containing Return of the Jedi), will be empty, and still retain the original title Revenge of the Jedi.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  67. More cash for Lucas? by Maul · · Score: 1

    Fans: Original Star Wars on DVD... but something seems wrong about it. Crap, this is the remastered one in which Han doesn't shoot first, and other such travesties.

    Lucas: This DVD is my ORIGINAL vision, I'll never re-release the theatrical versions of the films.

    Fans: But we really would prefer the original version.

    Lucas: Nope, never going to do it.

    Fans: I guess it is better than nothing since the Dog ate my VHS tapes. *Buys DVD Set*

    Lucas: *Waits two Years* Hey guys, I decided I am going to re-release the old theatrical version of the original triliogy. For a couple hundred bucks, you can see Han shoot first again.

    Fans: Finally! Wait a second, we already bought your remastered DVD when you said you wouldn't do this! Now you want us to buy it again?

    Lucas: That's your problem, suckers!

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  68. theatre edits? by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

    so, I wonder if this means that they will be the versions that actually were shown in the theatres, of if they'll be the cuts that are on the original VHS releases?

  69. Brilliant! by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1, Redundant

    And I'll be the first to say

    May 4th be with you

    always

    1. Re:Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alwayth?

  70. Oh, you just reminded me by Maximilio · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Do you mean the idiotic sequence they inserted with Vader "going to his shuttle" where they couldn't even be bothered to hire James Earl Jones for 10 seconds of dialogue dubbing -- which additionally ruined the entire soundtrack by putting a dead-ass-dragging darth vader's theme in the middle of the escape from Bespin sequence?

    That one galled me more than Han shooting first, and it was mostly because there was so little reason for it to have been there -- I as a 10-year-old understood perfectly that Vader could have caught a shuttle to his star destroyer in the time allowed. I didn't have to fucking have it spelled out for me, and I especially didn't need to see it done so badly. I mean, there were maybe 2 or 3 things in all of the special editions that were done so well they were a pleasure to see -- the re-done Mos Eisley, and the liftoff of the Millenium Falcon from same, but they didn't clean up a lot of the obvious green blotches on the screen left over during the final battle scene, and almost all of the extras were in some way slopped in there. It's like we've got a clone of George Lucas monkeying with his films, because whatever touch he had in the '80's with filmmaking he's completely lost -- he thinks nothing of shattering the rhythm of a scene with gratutious special effects or fanboi money shots. This applies to the new films as well. It's like they were made by a different person.

    I still own the originals on laserdisc, but like a complete tool I will probably be buying these re-issues because the resolution is higher on DVD. And my LD player is broken and I can't think of a good reason to replace it.

    1. Re:Oh, you just reminded me by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      I haven't purchased a new copy since the THX remastered VHS tapes that came out just before the "special editions." I'm glad I held out too. (Although the amount I've historically spent on action figures probably counterbalances any imagined savings.)

      There was a lot I liked about the special editions. The updated space scenes and basically everything in background of Bespin was nice. I even liked the updated wampa monster. But seriously, why go to all that trouble of adding some awful new musical number in Jabba's palace and not even fix up the lightsabers in the first battle between Kenobi and Vader? It seemed so random.

      For every step forward there were two steps back. The Yani style Ewok song at the end and the new singers in Jabba's palace about did me in. And of course, the Greedo thing. Not only did it suck thematically, the action implementation sucked. The first shot looked so... I dunno. The scene was all bad. I haven't watched the DVD version, but I can't imagine they made it much better. The Jabba scene in IV, while cute, was totally unecessary and really never looked right or fit.

      The few parts I did see of the new DVD release were enough to turn me off. Boba Fett had this cool menacing voice. What did they replace it with? "G'day mate! I'm Boba Fett and today we're gonna be tracking the WILD HAN SOLO! He's a slippery little bugger, but he's no match for THE BOUNTY HUNTER!" I realize it was the voice from the dude that played Jango Fett but the voice over... I mean... you might as well have neutered Boba Fett.

      I wish I had the ability to cut my own with what I did like from the special edition with the original. Maybe I can with these DVDs.

      I haven't watched the originals since I saw the special editions in the theater. I'm gonna scoop these bad boys up pretty much as soon as they're available. It's a good day.

    2. Re:Oh, you just reminded me by The_Shadows · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular belief it is James Earl Jones voicing Vader in the strangely sounding scene where he calls to ready his Star Destroyer.

      Link!
      (scroll down to the audio changes)

      However, it was 20 years since he did Empire at that point. Plus, who knows what kind of shoddy job was done editing the sound in.

    3. Re:Oh, you just reminded me by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      "And my LD player is broken and I can't think of a good reason to replace it."

      to play various laserdiscs?

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    4. Re:Oh, you just reminded me by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Heh heh. Good one. I actually have not only a LD in my stereo system, but also a Super Beta deck. (AFAIK the video is no different from normal beta, but it supports PCM digital audio.) I have about ten LDs and maybe one beta tape, but I want to be able to play that stuff if it crops up. Plus, I have a Dazzle DV Bridge, so if I do come across some amazing legacy media that I can't find on DVD, I can always transfer it to a DivX file or something.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Oh, you just reminded me by Maximilio · · Score: 1
      Contrary to popular belief it is James Earl Jones voicing Vader in the strangely sounding scene where he calls to ready his Star Destroyer. Link! (scroll down to the audio changes) However, it was 20 years since he did Empire at that point. Plus, who knows what kind of shoddy job was done editing the sound in.

      No attribution is supplied for this assertion. I can damn well identify a voice, regardless of the age. It fucking does not sound like him at all. No technical explanation can possibly describe the voice not having the same timbre or pitch. What it sounds like is someone doing a very very bad imitation of Jones. And until given some kind of actual credible documentation otherwise I will continue to assume that is exactly the case.

    6. Re:Oh, you just reminded me by Maximilio · · Score: 1
      To tie myself to a chain of technology that is obsolete and will never progress any further? To buy a piece of equipment that cannot be repaired, and will be impossible to find parts and service for? For the sake of watching three movies?

      I actually have about 20 laserdiscs in my collection (I was stupid and bought it in about 1993, at the pre-dawn of the DVD age). But the ones that I really wanted to see I've already got DVD's for excepting Star Wars, and the special editions were almost good enough to be watchable that I decided not to go out and spend $50 or $75 on a piece of equipment for just those three movies.

      If these DVD's of the original versions aren't anything more than laserdisc rips, however, I may consider giving money to a pawnshop rather than George Lucas for the privledge of watching something I've already bought five or six times.

  71. Yeah yeah by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

    I'll try the lobster, but will you be here all week ?

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  72. Star Was "virgin" by debest · · Score: 1

    You know, I'm 35 years old (right in the heart of Star Wars fans' age demographic), and a geek as well. Nonetheless, I have not seen a single minute of any of the six movies. Not because I don't think I'll like them (I very likely will), but I just didn't have the access to them in the theatres or at home while I was young (very rural environment). Since then, I've been "holding out" until the right time to watch the series, and the time apparently has finally come!

    (Hey, maybe I can stretch this out another 5 years and hear all the "40 year old virgin" jokes!)

    In all seriousness, I do want to savour the experience as much as possible. I figure that I should watch the original releases in the order of their production (IV, V, VI, I, II, III). Anyone disagree?

    --
    Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    1. Re:Star Was "virgin" by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1
      But you know the spoiler moments - the important plot points, right? (Han **** first, Luke, I ** **** ******, etc)*?

      I have a friend who has never watched the Star Wars series, though he is a big geek. He's a Meg Ryan fan to boot. It's really incomprehensible.

    2. Re:Star Was "virgin" by debest · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know that Darth Vader is Luke's father. And from reading Slashdot, I know that Han shot first (shot who?), that Jar Jar Binks sucks, and that Natalie Portman has something to do with hot grits.

      Honestly, that is all I know about Star Wars.

      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    3. Re:Star Was "virgin" by pHatidic · · Score: 1

      Haha not too many people left with UIDs low enough to remember the Natalie Portman troll now adays.

    4. Re:Star Was "virgin" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless we just lurk for a long time first. A VERY long time in some cases.

  73. Please god, no... by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    Personally I thought it was an awful scene, and can understand exactly why it was cut. The original movie wasn't exactly the best acted or best-written ever made, but the Biggs scene was even worse.

  74. Cutting Edge Technology by joecynic · · Score: 1

    I suppose we'll be seeing the HD-DVD/Blu-Ray super-extra-special-re-release about the time someone figures out how to beam images directly into our minds. For a company that brags about being so on top of film technology, they always seem to be a step behing on the consumer media.

  75. Meet one now by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    While it's true I'm a fan of Star Wars so my opinion might be biased, I've never found anyone who's outright hated it.

    You have now.

    Shallow acting, lame, unimaginative plot. If you hadn't first seen it when you were a little kid you wouldn't care about it now.

    Star Wars junkies are just subconsiously nostalgic. It's psychology.

    1. Re:Meet one now by Captain+Zep · · Score: 1
      If you hadn't first seen it when you were a little kid you wouldn't care about it now.

      Maybe you're right. But a lot of us did, and we do. And that's why this is big news to us.

      If you hate it, fine. We can look forward to it, and you can continue to ignore it. Everyone's happy.

      Z.

    2. Re:Meet one now by nCnt++ · · Score: 1
      I'd love to take a poll of all the folks that *never* liked SW. I would bet most of them were north of driving age when they first saw it.

      There is something magical about a kid's imagination when they watch those old favorites. Lucas and Disney depend on it.

      Prove it to yourself, if you are in your thirties watch "Stand by Me" again. It's not nearly as moving now. And you'll be able to do the same thing with "Braveheart" in ten years.

      --
      Have you ever noticed the best /. comments are long and the best Chuck Norris jokes are short?
    3. Re:Meet one now by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Well, me and my father saw the orignal theatrical release of Star Wars back in '77 at least 4 times that I can remember - he did and still does think it is a great film. Of course he actually remembers watching Buck Rodgers and other serial/action type stuff from when he was a kid, so he may have been waxing nostalgic about that too...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    4. Re:Meet one now by Literaphile · · Score: 1
      Star Wars is a childhood thing for me too, and I still love it today. BUT...

      You're bang on... mostly. The plot may be unimaginative, but it works wonders! I do agree about the bad acting and general lameness at times.

      What gets is these days is when people complain about the acting and dialogue in the new trilogy. Let's face it, the dialogue in the original trilogy was just plain CHEESY! Not any better than the new stuff. It's just nostalgia (which I admit to fully buying into!).

      And, really, there's not much bad acting in the new trilogy, not any more than any other movie. Hayden Christensen is a little wooden at times but that's OK. And I still thought it was uber cool when Vader finally appeared at the end of episode three...

    5. Re:Meet one now by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Let's face it, the dialogue in the original trilogy was just plain CHEESY!

      Yep. I think it was Harrison Ford who reportedly said to Lucas, "You can write this #@$!, George, but you can't say it."

      Not any better than the new stuff.

      Actually, I'd disagree here. The old stuff was just as cheesy, but it had more life to it. Although that may have been as much in the delivery as in the writing.

      there's not much bad acting in the new trilogy, not any more than any other movie

      The new movies have taken a number of very good actors (Natalie Portman, Ewan McGregor, and by reports even Hayden Christensen) and somehow gotten sub-par acting out of them. Compare Han/Leia with Anakin/Amidala in the middle movies. Which pairing has more chemistry? Which relationship seems more natural, and which seems shoehorned in because the plot requires it?

      Even the space battles. As fascinating as it is to watch the details in the opening battle of Episode III, it doesn't have the emotional punch of the battle above Endor in Return of the Jedi.

      Personally, I blame the director. A New Hope was directed by a young George Lucas who was full of energy and passion. It was cheesy, but his exuberance brought you along for the ride. Empire and Jedi were directed by people who knew what they were doing. The sequels were directed by a George Lucas who had mellowed with age and, most importantly, had not directed a movie in 18 years.

      I think if Lucas had done everything else the same, but just let someone else direct the films, they would have turned out much better.

  76. only 2.0 audio, not the 5.1 from the LDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on how faithful to the theatrical release you want your SW, this DVD release isn't *quite* as good since it only has the original Dolby 2.0 audio and not the 5.1 sound track that was on the Star Wars: The Definitive Collection LD set.

    1. Re:only 2.0 audio, not the 5.1 from the LDs by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

      the original wasn't in 5.1, cuz there was no 5.1 yet. I thought SW was one of the first Dolby Stereo (Dolby System) movies, no? Not *the* first, but one of the first handful, and likely the biggest release to date anyway. It was very similar to what became Dolby Surround in the home. Left, Center, Right, and Surround channels matrixed into a stereo signal. According to this even the 6-track 70mm release was derived from the same four-channel mix that would, today, be considered 2.0 sound. So it would seem to me that the original theatrical release would indeed be 2.0, and not anything else.

  77. So screw the b*****ds by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
    I never would have bought the redux trilogy if I'd believed this was coming.

    Probably neither would I. But since I did, they won't get any more money out of me now. Sorry, I loved the originals as a kid, but for the same money I could have a box set of the latest series of 24, Lost, Battlestar Galactica, or a few other series of similar quality that have come out over the past couple of years. (OK, none of the above actually have their latest series out on DVD yet, but they will shortly.)

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  78. How many more..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So know I can have a DVD version of the un-edited versions on the shelf next to my DVD box set of the re-release versions next to my laser disk versions of the originals next to the TV released versions I taped back in the early 80s next to the VHS versions of the original re-release that I bought before I had a DVD player.

    CHECK PLEASE!

  79. So I become five whenever it comes on. So what? by clydemaxwell · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what does it, but when I watch the films I regress to that state of wonder and fantasy.
    I am a film snob but star wars still entertains me every time. Something nostalgic or timeless about it, I guess!

    --
    Browsing with classic discussion, noscript, at -1 and nested
    no hidden comments and I only mod UP
  80. Episode VII: Repackaging of the Clones by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Finally! Another way to donate to one of my favourite charities: The Lucas Family Inheritance

    I wonder if he will be re-releasing Star Wars in 3-D in the original, and altered formats?

    The money will never run out at this rate ;)

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  81. Now you can make your TRUE original DVDs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once I buy this, I am going to rip it, remove the new versions, and burn myself TRUE original DVDs. I don't want those P.O.S. new versions anywhere near my originals! And if the MPAA comes after me, they'll see who shoots first.

  82. HOLYGODAMSWEEEEEEET!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like the widescreen edition, but I'll take whatever it is they (Lucas) is dishing out.

    Still haven't bothered to see "Episode III" and I've been boycotting Hollywood for several years (by which, I infer that I have not even bothered to download the fucking movie). If this is the genuine article, I will lift my boycott long enough to buy the DVD, and then drop it right back down where it was.

    George, you've been blowing it out your ass since about 1988. This is the first god damn good decision you've made since then.

  83. Why 2004 versions? by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    I don't see why they are bundling the original trilogy with the 2004 SE versions. They are out there already. Anyone (that wants them) already has them. Hell, most people that want these original versions want them because they *don't* like the 2004 SE's!

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  84. Re:Maybe they ARE listening... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1
    Suffice to say it features two important characters, both holding guns...

    Actually, they're changing the guns to walkie-talkies.

    --
    Redundancy is good And also good.
  85. Public Domain - an honest statement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If the Star Wars films were in the public domain by now, as it could easily be argued they "should" be, according to the original idea of copyright law, would we ever see releases on new and better formats?"

    Actually no it wouldn't, even under original copyright. Copyright says nothing about what format should get released to the public domain, and Lucas could re-release a 2004 version that could get a new copyright because it's sufficiently different from the public domain version, aka a fork when code diverges due to licenses.

  86. golf clap by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

    *clap clap clap clap*

    --
    Send your spendthrift head of state this
  87. Dolby 2.0 audio? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    Each original theatrical version will feature Dolby 2.0 Surround sound, close-captioning, and subtitles in English, French and Spanish for their U.S. release.

    You've got to be kidding me. What's the point?

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Dolby 2.0 audio? by iainl · · Score: 1

      Dolby 5.1 was released in 1992. Care to explain how you're going to make "Original Theatrical version, withot any changes" sit with a 5.1 track?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:Dolby 2.0 audio? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      You remaster it? I mean this just seems like a bit of a tacked on thing to be honest. It's nice to get the original versions and all, but it's also sorta pointless if all it is is a DVD version of the VHS releases.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    3. Re:Dolby 2.0 audio? by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

      it's not, it's a dvd version of the theatrical releases. The vhs versions were different than the theatrical releases. Although it could very well be of the same edits as were on the vhs releases, but we won't know until they're out there I guess.

    4. Re:Dolby 2.0 audio? by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1
      it's also sorta pointless if all it is is a DVD version of the VHS releases

      These will be anamorphic. It makes a big difference if you have a widescreen TV.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    5. Re:Dolby 2.0 audio? by iainl · · Score: 1

      No, making the audio 5.1 is changing the audio mix. Sure, I'm in a minority by being quite so picky about it (though a large enough minority that the original Academy Award-winning mono track was restored for the second Jaws DVD), but why is changing the sound effects OK if re-doing the visuals isn't?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  88. About Time by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    For a company that makes really great 3D animation, the animation they inserted into 4,5,&6 was really horrible.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:About Time by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      I think they were practicing. Remember the goal was to work their way up to fully-digital human characters.

  89. OMG! Now I can buy them for the 7th time!! by mrfett · · Score: 2, Funny

    OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! Thank you George for milking me for my entire net worth!

    1. Re:OMG! Now I can buy them for the 7th time!! by Kris_B_04 · · Score: 1

      No kiddin.
      Lessee.
      I bought the vinyl soundtracks, I have them on VHS (both new and old versions) and then they finally realized that DVD was gonna hang around for a while, so now I have the newest version on DVD. *sigh* I figured I didn't need the old version on DVD too...

      Now, I'm just waiting for the prequel trilogy to come out in a special edition box and my entire set will be complete. Again.

      blah.
      Kris

      --
      Remember when Windows were washed, mice were trapped and UNIX guarded the harem?
  90. LaserDiscs by HeaththeGreat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now the value of my Star Wars LaserDiscs is going to plummet!

    1. Re:LaserDiscs by Paolo+DF · · Score: 1

      Wanna sell?

      --
      Pumbaa! I don't wonder; I know.
  91. Dumbasses by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1
    "This release will only be available for a limited time: from September 12th to December 31st."

    Is anyone really stupid enough to think this marketing tactic will work in the age of P2P? What the hell do they think is gonna happen on January 1st when net-savvy customers can't find the movie in the stores?

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  92. shouldn't RotJ be in THX like in the theatres?? by SpecialAgentXXX · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the THX technology first introduced in Return of the Jedi? According to the web sites I've read, they will be released in Dolby 2.0 just like in the theatres. I can see IV, and V in 2.0, but shouldn't VI be in THX?

    1. Re:shouldn't RotJ be in THX like in the theatres?? by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 2, Informative

      THX isn't an audio format, it is specifications for audio reproduction. It isn't 5.1, or 6.1, or 7.1, or any other digit.digit for that matter. THX is just a guarantee that it meets certain qualities. Nothing is "in THX." www.thx.com

    2. Re:shouldn't RotJ be in THX like in the theatres?? by Bullistic · · Score: 1

      THX is not a sound format, but a quality standard. Back then we were still a long way from dolby digital.

  93. Wooo! Another Star Wars release :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay! Another release of Star Wars! Woooo. I honestly cant wait until the original theatrical hdvd version, the original theatrical blu-ray version, the original theatrical umd version, the cg enhanced hdvd version, the cg enhanced blue-ray version, the cg enhanced umd version, the special extended theatrical hdvd version, the special extended theatrical blu-ray version, the special extended umd version, the special extended cg hdvd version, the special extended cg blue-ray version, the special extended cg umd version, the 16:10 widescreen holophonic sound original theatrical hdvd version, the 16:10 widescreen holophonic sound original theatrical blu-ray...

  94. Watch them in production order by edawstwin · · Score: 1

    Yes, watch them in production order. What good scenes there are in the prequels are given more weight when knowing what happens decades later.

    --
    I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
  95. Today is Star Wars Day! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today's Star Wars Day: May the Fourth (be with you).

  96. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was amazed to see this. I'm not a Star Wars fan, and the recent movies have made certain that I lost any hint of interest I might have ever had in Star Wars, but, those original movies were pretty decent -- especially for the time. I just assumed they would be on DVD because LucasFilm is kind of known for trying to be state of the art (that is kind of one of the key points of Star Wars...) To hear that they've had a huge potential audience that they just ignored is amazing though. Everybody else had already been putting old movies and even series onto DVDs since shortly after they came out because there's a huge market for that. All this could do was delay how long it took them to get the money off of it, loose the initial burst of fans rushing in if they had released, say, just before any one of the new movies (sales would have really spiked just before those, and an announcement and release just before any one of them would have driven the market wild.) But, hey, they don't need money anyway, right? They're just a business.

    Frankly, whoever was responsible for that little peice of marketing should be fired.

  97. Maybe i am alone on this but... by devilsbrigade · · Score: 1

    I don't really care for the "star wars universe". Lucas has long since ruined the story for me with his changes to the original movies, crappy prequel and in all a loss of the original heart of the story. I think the simpsons had it right when they made fun of the series, and George Lucas, haveing the AT AT break into senate...then sit down to wait his turn to speak. i have the original series on the remasted VHS...and i don't think i have watched it in years. Yes, when i was younger i loved stars wars...i had the ewok tree house too. But since i have gotten older i have realized how wooden, and how badly done the movies really are. I know i am not gonna win converts...but it just seems like anytime Lucas rereleases something from past decades, everyone is on his junk with how great it is. has anyone actually seen that THX movie? Yeeesh.

    1. Re:Maybe i am alone on this but... by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      I agree - it was OK at the time, but is now kind of cheesy.

  98. Trilogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought a trilogy was made up of three things, not two. Only Empire Strikes back and Return of the Jedi were mentioned. Is there some other official DVD release of the original A New Hope that I missed?

  99. Can you REALLY trust your memory? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have no idea whether or not this scene was in the original version of the film, which I did see when it came out. It's been too long for me to remember stuff like that. I can say that the human mind has an amazing ability to remember things that never happened. I worked with 2 guys a few years who both swore they saw on TV an episode of _You Bet Your Life_ with Groucho Marx where supposedly the following conversation took place:

    Groucho: Why do you have so many kids? (NOTE: the man is said to have had 9 kids or maybe more, depending on who tells the story.)
    Man: I love my wife.
    Groucho: Well, I love my cigar, but I take it out every now and then.

    I read some of a biography of Groucho and the author looked into this. He said that it NEVER happened on the TV show, but a conversation somewhat similar did happen in the early 1950s on Groucho's radio version of the show, which predated the TV version by some years. Interestingly enough, the incident did NOT happen on broadcast, but happened while the show was on a commercial break. If you look on the Internet, this whole story has been debunked at various sites, yet I had 2 guys who were very vehement that they saw this. I told one of them that there was no evidence anywhere to support his story and lots of evidence that it never happened and he basically said "I still remember seeing it."

    One of the guys used to tell stories about a couple of Soupy Sales shows he swears were broadcast nationally in the early 1960's that involved some jokes about 4 letter words. I did some research on the internet and these have been debunked, yet this guy swears he saw these episodes. Frankly, it makes no sense at all that this could even be true in that era of broadcast TV, but this guy was about ready to fight you if you suggested that it didn't really happen. Maybe you're right and it was in the film, but sometimes memory plays tricks on us.

    1. Re:Can you REALLY trust your memory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that this scene was in the Star Wars novel by George Lucas, so it's possible that people remembered it from there. I believe there was some sort of recreation on one of the old SW games from the 80s as well.

      That book also contained the story of the Darth Vader/Obi-Wan battle on the Lava planet, which was something every SW geek knew about, but very few could pin the source down.

  100. In the infamous words of Darth Vader... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    "The circle is now complete."

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  101. Bittersweet... by brucmack · · Score: 1

    If it really is the original version of the film, it'll be a bit of a bittersweet experience, because I doubt they'll spend all that much money on remastering it... The DVD re-release looks really really great, so if you can look beyond the edits, it's still a joy to watch. Will the original version look like shit in comparison?

    Anyway, this solidifies the fact that money trumps any artistic principles Lucas has/had, as if there were any doubt...

  102. Obligatory SWHS joke by zoeblade · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does Lucasfilm have that so few movies today lack? Timelessness

    Yep, Star Wars Holiday Special makes people cringe just as much today as it did when it first aired.

  103. Sigh... by Mayhem178 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know it's trendy to bash George Lucas and Star Wars and all, but I'm getting a little tired of hearing the same arguments against them over and over.

    "George Lucas makes a lot of money, therefore he's a sell-out and evil." Well, gee, I never would have guessed that a guy should expect to make money off a venture into which he has poured 32 years of his life and millions upon millions of dollars of his own money. And let's not forget that when he was first starting out, he fully expected failure. He produced ANH with the movie studios laughing in his face. Even the actors working for him thought it was a little silly.

    "George Lucas says one thing, then a few years later changes his mind." Such high standards! I know that something I said a few years ago sure doesn't hold much much water with me now. What do you expect him to do? Read the future?

    "Star Wars sucks!" Wonderful. It's great that you're outspoken and all. I don't think you're gonna be able to talk Lucas out of releasing this new box set, but you're welcome to try.


    So, we've had an original VHS release, a special edition release, and a DVD box set release of the original trilogy. So what if he wants to release the originals again on DVD? No one's forcing you to buy them. If it's really that big a deal to you to see the original cut vs. the remastered/re-edited versions, then buy them. If not, then don't. It's as simple as that. Don't put the blame at Lucas' doorstep.

    Me, personally, I'm probably going to hold out and see what the impending 6-DVD box set will be like. I already have the special edition VHS tapes and the remastered box set. If the 6-DVD box set doesn't include the original trilogy as it was before the special edition re-editing, then I'll just buy this set that coming soon.

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

  104. I actually like the 'enhanced' version by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I think the enhanced version is pretty cool. As it is aparent that there IS a signficiant difference to the original due to the lack of technology and money back in the seventies. However, I'd compile a reedit. Enhanced ANH,ESB,ROJ but with original Skywalker at the end of ROJ (that's gonna cost Lukas 10 years in hell anyway, I guess) and, of course, Han Solo shooting first.

    The Rest is really worth the tuneup. Mos Eisley more crowded, the one or other neat exterior, better Space and Death Star combat, etc ... all do the film some good imho.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  105. OriginalTrilogy.com by Tryfen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Come take a look at http://originaltrilogy.com/ - these are real fans who've taken the original Laserdiscs(!) and created DVDs with ALL the original content in them.

    Top stuff for any fan.

    --
    If a square is really a rhombus, why aren't all triangles purple?
    1. Re:OriginalTrilogy.com by Whyzzi · · Score: 1

      #3y dud3! W#3r3'$ 7#3 70rr3n7$?!

      --
      "BSD is about people pissing each other.." (Moid Vallat)
    2. Re:OriginalTrilogy.com by Solokron · · Score: 1

      Whoa! She is cute. I can see why the scene was cut though. Bigg's character acting is not exactly "stellar".

      --
      30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  106. Why stop there? by zoeblade · · Score: 1

    I'd personally love to see the version of Star Wars episode 4 that George Lucas showed to his friends before it had the music and special effects in it. For comedy value alone, it'd be great to hear someone shout "bang!" when Tarkin destroys a planet, hear Chewbacca proclaim "that old man's mad!" instead of growling, hear the voice of the person who played Darth Vader's body, as well as seeing all the cardboard cutout stormtroopers.

  107. HD-DVD Mr. Lucas? by hipsterdufus · · Score: 1

    While I would really like to have the theatrical version, I would LOVE to have an HD-DVD version of all the films. Since he shot in HD with a digital camera, the pictures should be stunning. While some bemoan the acting, there are some fine actors in the first three, so if one has to blame someone for bad acting, you should be leveling your criticism against the director.

  108. yet another rip by bermudatriangleoflov · · Score: 0

    is it just me, or is this just another attempt to rape the wallets of star wars loving geeks?

  109. What George Lucas is REALLY Saying... by benjleroy · · Score: 1

    I like Money, give me more money...

  110. Thanks, but no thanks by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    I bought a used laserdisc player and the complete trilogy (not the prequels!) for my birthday last year. Lucas, you won't be getting any more of my money. It's nice that you've seen the light finally (though more likely it's just that you've finally realized how many dollars you were turning down in the name of your idiotic "artistic vision and integrity". Sure, I may have to change disks in the middle of each movie, but at least I have the films as I remember them and without making your wallet even fatter.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  111. I just got around... by Mezz · · Score: 1

    ...to copying my VHS boxed set over to DVD. I can enjoy the new altered versions (well, except for the closing song at the end of ROTJ, wtf was that about, I like the Ewok celebration) but I like the original versions better.

    Hell, I was thinking about seeing if anyone wanted the originals on DVD...aw well, guess Lucas beat me to that one.

  112. Original + Remake by bilbravo · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who caught the fact that these are releases of the new versions on one disc, and the old version on another? So this is buying both movies... this isn't going to be cheap. I know it won't matter for fans, but I still think it's ridiculous. Just release the originals, nothing else, in one package.

  113. Don't buy right now...wait until by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1

    the ULTIMATE ULTRA Star Wars Pakcage for the ULTIMATE FAN -- LIMITED EDITION!!111!!

    Contents will include:
    DVD 1: SW 4 Original Version Unedited
    DVD 2: SW 5 Original Version Unedited
    DVD 3: SW 6 Original Version Unedited

    DVD 4: SW 4 Edited version with deleted scenes!!11
    DVD 5: SW 5 Edited version with deleted scenes!!11
    DVD 6: SW 6 Edited version with deleted scenes!!11

    DVD 7: SW 1 Original Version Unedited
    DVD 8: SW 2 Original Version Unedited
    DVD 9: SW 3 Original Version Unedited

    DVD 10: SW 1 Edited version with deleted scenes and additions!!11
    DVD 11: SW 2 Edited version with deleted scenes and additions!!11
    DVD 12: SW 3 Edited version with deleted scenes and additions!!11

    COMING OUT SOON:

    the ULTIMATE ULTRA Star Wars Pakcage for the ULTIMATE FAN -- LIMITED EDITION!!111!! with Gold DVD Disks and GOLD lettering + footage of the set as taped, including EXCLUSIVE interviews,where the cast ate, where they slept step by step on how to make ALL the star wars models JUST like the set did way back in 1977!! You wont want to miss this onE! this is a LIMITED Version of the already ULTRA LIMITED DVD collection that you have already come to love and enjoy while going broke!

  114. Re:Don't get too proud of this technological terro by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

    I think he can really claim this is 'how it was' when it's 2.0 surround - that's the best that was available at the time. If he remixed it to 5.1 (even if he didn't insert comedy head-bumping effects this time) it'd still be an 'improvement'.

    People asked for the original, that's what they're going to get. That said, I hope it's 'cleaned up' - remove artifacts and dust from the transfer...

    I'm so glad I didn't buy the special edition DVDs now - I can retire my bootleg copies of the 'originals' and get this instead.

    And not watch the special editions until they're re-released in 3D on HD-DVD/Blu-Ray/whatever :)

    Mark

    --
    Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
  115. But is it the ORIGINAL ORIGINAL New Hope by ShadeRF · · Score: 1

    But is it the original orignal A New Hope without that pesky Episode IV tag. I don't want my movie bastardized by another one of George's changes.

    1. Re:But is it the ORIGINAL ORIGINAL New Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to IMDB, the original original also features a slightly different audio track. However, I think you'll see that it's one of the two Empire Strikes Back-era re-releases.

      (The original version went through three audio tracks during its initial theatrical release, each one slightly different then the previous. Of these, the last two were modified to include 'Episode IV' for the release. Supposedly, the one that didn't get the Episode IV modification and re-release is the only release where the aunt's voice hasn't been dubbed over by another actress.)

  116. Good by Blisshead · · Score: 1

    about time. I want the same for Blade Runner now.

  117. Ummmm by GmAz · · Score: 1

    Isn't the classic star wars already on DVD? I mean, if not, then what do I own and watch on DVD?

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
  118. Lucas sees the light by SIGFPE · · Score: 1

    Copyright law was invented to encourage the dissemination of arts, not to allow artists to suppress them. Unfortunately it's hard to design copyright law in such a way that it doesn't rule out the possibility of the latter. I'm glad Lucas has seen the light and is now doing the right thing.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  119. What about all my other copies? by Astin · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, anybody want my 2 sets of LaserDisc copies of the original trilogy? The 3 individual movies, and the collectors set with the big ol' book about the series and its production.

    No, wait, I'm keeping those. Even if I do have to flip discs over and change them.

    Or how about the original VHS box set? Pre-THX version?

    The original trilogy DVD set with all the changes?

    I might even have the "turn the page when you hear the chime" records/tapes/books from when I was a kid. Could have a sticker book kicking around as well.

    Is ANYBODY surprised by this? The moment Lucas swore up and down that he'd never release the originals again, that they'd been destroyed, burned, eaten, crapped out and flushed, we all knew that they'd be out on DVD.

    --
    - In hell, treason is the work of angels.
  120. Lucas is a Fucking Asshole by sootman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    and I'd say that to his face. First of all, I really do believe that this has been his plan all along, at least since he saw the controversy surrounding the 1997 re-releases. Did you RTFA? "Lucasfilm Ltd. and Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment will release attractively priced individual two-disc releases of Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi. Each release includes the 2004 digitally remastered version of the movie and, as bonus material, the theatrical edition of the film." So it's not even a nice, neat little trilogy--you have to buy each two-disc set individually. Great--now I'll own two copies of the version I don't like. You know what? I think I'll give away both sets to people who don't care about the edits--that'll be two more sales Lucas doesn't get--and I'll only keep the original version only. I encourage everyone else to do the same.

    "This release will only be available for a limited time: from September 12th to December 31st." Why? What fucking purpose does it serve to only release it for less than 3 months? Is FHE getting out of the DVD-pressing business? You know, I think I just figured it out. I bet that fucker will charge $100 per episode. Lucas' accountants probably crunched the numbers and came up with the price that is the most 99% of all geeks would pay, and he'll make enough in 80 days to retire several times over--again. "Attractively priced" my ass. Attractive to him, maybe. If they're a penny less than $24.95 I'll eat the packaging.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  121. The classic saga by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ben Kenobi: For almost two decades the star wars movies were enjoyed by all. Before the dark times. Before the Edits.

    Luke Skywalker: How did the movies die?

    Ben Kenobi: A film producer named George Lucas, who was an idol of mine until he turned to evil, helped the industry change the scenes. He betrayed and murdered the Star Wars movies.

    ---------------------

    Darth Vader: "There is no escape. Don't make me edit you. Luke, you do not yet realize your importance. You've only begun to discover your power. Join me and I will edit your training. With our combined strength we can end this great film series and bring profit to the company"

    Luke Skywalker: "I'll never join you!"

    Darth Vader: "If you only knew the power of the Movie Business. Obi-Wan never told you what happened to the movies."

    Luke Skywalker: "He told me enough! He told me you killed him!"

    Darth Vader: "No. I am the movies."

    Luke Skywalker: "No. That's not true! That's impossible!"

    Darth Vader: "Search your feelings. You know it to be true."

    Luke Skywalker: "Noooooooo!"

    Darth Vader: "Luke, you can destroy the Movie Business. It has foreseen this. It is your destiny. Join me, and together we shall rule Hollywood as father and son. Come with me. It is the only way."

    ---------------

    Luke Skywalker: "Search your feelings, Lucas. You can't do this. I feel the conflict within you. Let go of your hate."

    Darth Vader: "It is too late for me, consumers. The Movie Business will show you the true nature of money. It is your master now."

    Luke Skywalker: "Then my movies are truly dead."

    -------------------

    Anakin Skywalker: "Luke, help me take these edits off."

    Luke Skywalker: "But you'll die."

    Anakin Skywalker: "Nothing can stop that now. Just for once, let me look on you with my original film."

    (Luke disconnects and releases the original films on dvd.)

    Anakin Skywalker: "Now, go my consumer. Leave me."

    Luke Skywalker: "I won't leave you here; I've got to save the movies!"

    Anakin Skywalker: "You already have, Luke. You were right, you were right about me. Tell your fellow consumers you were right..."

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:The classic saga by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      I like John Blunt's take on it better.

  122. DVD? Took you long enough. by soupforare · · Score: 1

    Hope you guys enjoy buying the movies for the fifth time.
    BTW, my laserdisc copy of the trilogy still works great~

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
  123. Re:Don't get too proud of this technological terro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it's the same as the laserdisc release, then the 2.0 dolby track is a dolby surround encoded one. I mastered out DVD copies from those laserdiscs a couple years back, decoded and re-encoded the soundtrack to 5.1. tough to get a stereo field out of a mono surround track :)

  124. Everyone forgets by DrugCheese · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the most important thing lost from the original 3.

    We'll finally be able to dance to the Yub Nub song at the end of Jedi again

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  125. But in the novelization, Jabba is there by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    in the hanger bay...

    I don't know if this was in the original script or not, but in the novel "Star Wars" (released before RotJ) Jabba does confront Han in the hanger bay. Of course, as described, he's completely different than the Jabba we see in RotJ, he's in some sort of a container of liquid. I distinctly remember that he is described as jumping up and spinning around in surprise, because he and his crew of thugs are facing the Falcon and he calls out "We've got you surrounded" and then Han says from behind him "If so, you're facing the wrong way."

    I don't remember the exact wording or author (a well-known Sci-Fi author... Alan Dean Foster?) and the book is at home, but the idea that Jabba confronts Han in the hanger bay is much older than the special editions.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:But in the novelization, Jabba is there by curecollector · · Score: 1

      Well, as I said the only thing that bothered me about it was that the conversation is too close to the one Han just had with Greedo. If anything, if they wanted to restore/finish the old Jabba scene, they should have just axed the exchange with Greedo, as they just ended up screwing that up. As it stands now, Han has the same conversation twice in the span of a couple of minutes.

  126. yub yub! by leland242 · · Score: 1

    Nice, the "yub yub" song will be back in rotj...

    1. Re:yub yub! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      you kid, but i always liked the yub yub song. And best of all, no Hayden Christianson at the end! The real Darth Vader is back!

  127. Bad Joke... by red_kenotic · · Score: 2, Funny

    May the forth... be with you

  128. Another version to buy? F.U. Lucas by Broken+Bottle · · Score: 1

    This is seriously ridiculous. How many times are they going to release these movies? How many definitive editions can we have? The demand for the "original versions" of these films has been there since the VIDEO TAPES of the updated editions were released. This isn't a suprise to Lucas. No more new movies = = slow dying revenue streams. This constantly taking advantage of his fans has to stop.

  129. 3 words by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Han shot first!

  130. I'm 35 and... by hummassa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    When I re-watch "Stand by Me" (or read King's Four Seasons) I feel moved. "Braveheart", I never thought very much of it; but almost every Stephen King-based story strikes me profoundly.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  131. grail by uberjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please, Please, this is supposed to be a happy occasion. Lets not bicker and argue about who killed who.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  132. Re:Don't get too proud of this technological terro by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    superhappyfun.com has the old Laserdisc releases available on DVD-R. As a bonus, you just might get a copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special.

  133. Digital Rights by zenwrench · · Score: 0

    I understand that this is America and we feel an urge to whack off copiously to free enterprise and all that ... but I'm seriously tired of feeling like the gravel in george lucas' drive way ... don't get me wrong, the guy has made some amazing movies, but could he try being just slightly less of a whore for a change?

    George baby, I get it already, star wars is nerd crack. You changed the landscape of nerd masterbation fantasies forever. And most true SW fans would love to relive the originals, esp. empire. And of course I, amoung you, want to see the originals again, sans all the CGI and other BS.

    And I will see these movies, but I swear by dagobah I won't buy them. Esp. if I have to buy the remasters along with them. George, conservation babe? Save a few trees here and there and bring your ewok constituents back into the fold.

    No I won't buy them. I pledge to you george, I will bootleg these movies. I won't distribute, but I will bootleg. And even after I've made good copies, I will bootleg some more. I will bootleg while making light saber sounds. I will bootleg while watching STTNG reruns on spike. I will bootleg just for the satisfaction of knowing there's a few less ounces of imported egyptian marble lining the bidet in your carribean summer home.

  134. Good price, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd gladly pay a bit more if they would sell it without Return of the Tedi.

  135. Hit the suckers up again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it makes some sucker buy it all over again, Lucas is all for it.

    1. Re:Hit the suckers up again. by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      Maybe Peter Jackson can learn from Lucas. He could re-release Lord of the Rings with a few changes, then release it later on HD-DVDs. Then later, after all of the "Special Collectors Edition" and "Extra Special Collectors Edition - Directors Cut" haver been out awhile, release the original LOTR on HD-DVD in multiple various editions. He could be making money for years.

  136. Re:Don't get too proud of this technological terro by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

    That version will be released in a special 9-disc set sometime around 2011.

    --
    -David
  137. Pirates arrr cool by Bruzer · · Score: 1

    I have had a laser disc transfer to DVD of the original movies for years. I had to order them when I read that Lucas would never release the movies in their original format.

    Now the question is what do I do? Buy the new ones, or just keep my Mandolin knock off replicas?

    --
    "Tempt not a desperate man" - Willy S.
  138. it wasn't there when I saw it... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    I was young too. But I do remember the movie well. And it wasn't there.

    But these were older days for movies. Movies started on the coasts and worked their way across the country. It had been out for weeks before it came to Flint, Michigan. So it is possible it had been in early cuts and excised.

    But given the clip on youtube is incomplete. Given the unliklihood of an R version of a movie so obviously meant to appeal to young adults (on the "R" cut theory). And given how poor an intro to the movie this scene is. I'd guess it wasn't shown on there in the theatrical release.

    The acting sure sucks, I mean even in comparison to the regular acting in Star Wars.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  139. Not buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm not buying it. Fuck them if they want another penny out of me.

  140. Haha...critics by zerosix · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess you got to love all the critics out there! Geez, I mean I grew up watching Star wars video's and imagining AT-AT's destroying my neighborhood! I've seen the original, the SE, and the newer ones. Do I like everything that has been done with the series? No. But I have respect for George Lucas and his imagination. As a whole, the movies are damn good! I'd like to see anyone else come up with an anthology over such a timeline to match the cultic experience of Star Wars. Obviously, the newer movies weren't going to have the same effect as the older ones, but why should I shoot Mr. Lucas over that? Come on, cut the guy some slack...you all know you want to buy it anyway! :P

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. ~Albert Einstein
  141. So much for Final Video Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    "I am pleased that for the final video release of STAR WARS in its original version, we can present it with the best sound and picture quality yet available, thanks to THX Digital Mastering." - George Lucas, 1995
    Ru-roh George!
  142. I agree by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    The scene they added (by dubbing Han's Greedo conversation onto the scene) is too close in time to the Greedo scene. It's definitely noticable that Han is basically repeating himself.

    Too bad there wasn't a way to put the scene in with new dialog. As it is, I agree they should have left it out, I was just pointing out that the scene wasn't really new to the Special Editions. :-)

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:I agree by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      If you haven't had to explain the exact same thing to two different people, one right after the other, in the span of a few minutes, then you are not a software engineer.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  143. Please stand by... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    for a twenty-one gun salute.

  144. Theatrical version too? Oh hell yes! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Thank you George! You, or at least someone with decision-making power understood fan attachment to the originals. And, while the DVDs contain the re-edited versions, you're thrown us a bone and actually used DVD's ability to track across multiple versions to deliver the original as well.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  145. Sorry Lucas - I've owned these for FIVE YEARS by AudioEfex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry George. I bought bootleg copies (very nice bootlegs) a half a decade ago when you stated publicly that you would NEVER release these.

    Now that you've changed your mind, I'm not just going to run out and buy them. Why should I? I already have them. Sure, they may have a bit better video quality, but I'm refusing to give you my $ just because you realized you needed the cash and it meant more than your supposed "artistic integrity".

    Too little, too late. You had a good 15 years of me buying everything you put out (FS VHS, Widescreen VHS box set, Definitive Collection LD's, "face" CLV LD's)....but your attitude towards fans, in spite of this 11th hour reversal, just make me not care.

    I have no problem paying good money for great product, but conversely when someone like Lucas dicks fans over and over I have no problem going the bootleg/download route. I bet the BitTorrent sites will have it before it even comes out. :) And it's all Lucasfilms fault that I'm not giving them any more of my cash. I didn't buy the 2004 editions (raping the memory of dead actors by replacing them digitally was the limit for me), and I won't buy these.

    AE

  146. Blade Runner (theatrical edition) by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Now then, when do they release the original version of Blade Runner to DVD?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:Blade Runner (theatrical edition) by saddino · · Score: 1

      Just call up Harrison Ford in the middle of the night and listen to him mumble while watching the current DVD release; that's pretty close to the original.

    2. Re:Blade Runner (theatrical edition) by Aziraphale+Jasra · · Score: 1

      It's floating about on the torrent sites, and will be included with the special edition DVD (the one that's been completed for years but got caught in red tape, and may not see release for a very long time, if ever).

  147. Figures by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Damn it! And I wasted bandwidth downloading Laserdisc rips because Lucas insisted very emphatically that he will never, ever release the original unmolested films on DVD. Eh, I'll buy them anyhow.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  148. X0 edition by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, does this mean that those guys can stop the work they've done on the X0 laserdisc rips?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  149. Finally? by just_forget_it · · Score: 1

    The original films have been out on DVD for over a year now. This is just a new "Special special edition."

    1. Re:Finally? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 2, Informative

      "original" doesn't mean the first 3. original means han shoots first, no stupid cgi, no haydens ghost at the end, etc. the actual ORIGINAL theatrical releases

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  150. Ob. Police Squad by MikeMc · · Score: 1

    Sally: Then I guess I did shoot twice.

    http://www.xs4all.nl/~mrrob/policesquad/ps2.htm/

    --
    Marco...that was Portugese.
  151. Re:Don't get too proud of this technological terro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was very happy a few years ago to get my hands on DVD copies of the Laser Disc version.

    What I really want is the 6 movie set... or at least the New Trilogy set.

  152. Yep see them in the original order by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    I've heard other orders proposed, but I can't think of any that are significantly better than the original, while some are significantly worse.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  153. Yoda is the Jedi Measuring Device by Ahnteis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, it seems that pretty much ANY jedi can sense another jedi's strength. Why not just have Yoda et al say "hey! This one's teh strong!".

    1. Re:Yoda is the Jedi Measuring Device by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, it seems that pretty much ANY jedi can sense another jedi's strength. Why not just have Yoda et al say "hey! This one's teh strong!".

      Two reasons.

      First, it becomes impossible to show that Anakin's strongest ever. Sure, Yoda might say that Anakin's the strongest for 900 years, but beyond that, you need some sort of numerical indicator.

      And second, Lucas got the retroactive continuity syndrome. It seems to hit to every successfull author who returns to his old stories sooner or later. You start wondering if you couldn't refine some point a little, and before you know it, Takhisis has turned from the Dark Queen to a pathetic punch of neurosis who gets killed by an equally pathetic lovesick elf, the Valheru have stopped being the supreme threat from the past and become little more than puppets on a string, and oh yes, the Force has become something that a rodent (ysalamiri) can nullify and a cell organ (midichlorian) can influence.

      That's the most difficult part of writing stories and peeling onions: you have to know when to stop.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  154. Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money by kehren77 · · Score: 1

    nuff said...

  155. Temple of Doom by Kevbo · · Score: 1

    I thought that the introduction of "Short Round" in the Indiana Jones trilogy was not all that. There was a scene or two that made me groan, but for the most part, I thought he was pretty humorous for adults and children alike.
    Now, whether a director could get away with that kind of racial stereotyping (without hiding it under and alien's mask, that is) today is questionable.

    --
    In Vino Veritas
    1. Re:Temple of Doom by Kitsune818 · · Score: 1

      "Lady only here because she sleeping with director"

  156. Hear, hear by Pausanias · · Score: 1

    No pun intended, but I second that. That was actually the worst part of the "new release" changes for me---having to end the series without the Ewok music! ROTJ was the first movie I got to see in a theater, and it was my first experience with star wars... so that wacky "yum yum" music actually has a bit of nostalgia attached to it for me :)

  157. Han Solo for president! by argent · · Score: 1

    It could happen.

    Han Solo's opposed to the Evil Empire and he's definitely a free market type, so the Republicans should be 100% behind him. Now, remember, Star Wars was "A long time ago in a galaxy far far away", so after restoring him from carbonite (or whatever plot token is used to bring him to 21st Century America) his birthdate is way before the founding of the United States. That means that after Dubya grants him citizenship for sheer coolness, he wouldn't need a "Schwartznegger Amendment" to run for President.

    So, hey, even taking into account that he's fictional he's got at least as good a chance as Nader.

  158. No nice shiney boxset for "real" version of movie? by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

    I find it somewhat dissapointing that one cannot get the original theatrical release in a nice shiney boxset, but this is better than nothing.

    I guess my relatively restrained admiration of the films makes me somewhat out of place in this conversation anyway.

    --
    --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
  159. I have this to say about the "special editions" by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. The ability to destroy a movie is insignificant next to the power of the Force."

    with my apologies to Lord Vader.

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
    1. Re:I have this to say about the "special editions" by SithLordOfLanc · · Score: 1

      Gurk.
      "Apology Accepted."

  160. Star Wars Finally? by W4HTX · · Score: 2, Informative

    I hate to burst your bubble, but they released the 'box set' of all three of the Star Wars original Trilogy a good while back, 2 years ago just before Christmas I think. I have it on DVD, and while it does not contain the original theatrical release, who would really want that? It isn't anywhere near the quality of the digitized DVD version. So as to compare how good DVD is over film? What's the point, they've demonstrated that already!

  161. It's a trap! by binary+paladin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No. He's more machine now than man, twisted and evil.

    Seriously, this isn't about good in the least. Let me do some translating here. From TFA:

    "Over the years, a truly countless number of fans have told us that they would love to see and own the original version that they remember experiencing in theaters," said Jim Ward, President of LucasArts and Senior Vice President of Lucasfilm Ltd. "We returned to the Lucasfilm Archives to search exhaustively for source material that could be presented on DVD. This is something that we're very excited to be able to give to fans in response to their continuing enthusiasm for Star Wars."

    Like all PR machines, there's a certain amount of fudging that goes on, let me translate:

    "Over the years, a throng of vicious purists have told us that the so called 'improvements' suck balls. What they want to see is the original before we did more damage than repair. There was also a large number of nerds stationed outside George's house chanting, 'Han Shot First.'" said Jim Ward, President of LucasArts and Senior Vice President of Lucasfilm Ltd. "Pretty much, all we have to do is take the last VHS release before the special editions and prime it for DVD release. However, don't make the mistake that we're being altruistic to our fans in any way. The fact is, many of these weak willed nerds broke down and bought the first DVD release and now that their failure is complete, we can sock it to them with yet another release. George loves cash, what can we say? We double charge the weak and now even milk the cash out of the purists that were holding out."

    Dammit. Dammit. Dammit.

    1. Re:It's a trap! by Fred+Smythe · · Score: 1

      To this, I say: it's your own damn fault for buying it. Me, I took one look and said "Yeah, call me when the real trilogy comes out, instead of George Lucas's wank fantasy." And lookie here, it's gonna, so NOW they will get my money.

    2. Re:It's a trap! by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      good for you. i got the first dvd release as a freaking x-mas gift. i tried to hold out. i really did. damn parents who think they know what i want. gah!

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    3. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're exactly right. People want the originals. Lucas knew this but he put out the Special Edition first so they'd buy that knowing they'd purchase the originals later when they could. Now he's milked it for as long as he can but with HD-DVD on it's way he's got to release the originals now so he can cash in on them twice again in the near future.

      George Lucas has to be one of the greediest men alive!

    4. Re:It's a trap! by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      I didn't write it in this post, but I haven't purchased a copy since the THX remastered VHS came out just before the whole "Special Edition" fiasco. I only purchased those since my other copies were the ones my mom got me in the early 80s which had been watched WAY too many times by my little bother and me.

      I refused to buy the Special Editions. It looks like it's paying off for me too. (However, I still thought someone needed to properly translate the PR.)

  162. Your geek card is REVOKED by Elemenope · · Score: 1

    If you watch the movie carefully, Obi-Wan does NOT meet Anakin until after he has WON the pod race. Prior to that, all interaction with the stranded folks from Naboo was through Qwi-Gon, the Queen, and (ugh) Jar-Jar. Obi-Wan stayed behind on the ship to help with repairs. Since Anakin is the only human to EVER compete successfully, much less win, a pod-race (at six years old, no less), he is indeed a "great pilot" (not 'accomplished pilot').

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    1. Re:Your geek card is REVOKED by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Obi-Wan stayed behind on the ship to help with repairs.

      And to rescue Padme's double when she got kidnapped by the Hutts(?). Happened in one of the video games based on the movie.

  163. But by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    What about the 1997(?) remastered versions?

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  164. How long until this gets put on Amazon.com? by ysaric · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I'll add it to my wish list, although the price tag will likely be ridiculous. Better to spend the small sums on the tr47 bootleg DVD release.

    --
    Happy goldfish bowl to you.
  165. What about THX?!? by eMartin · · Score: 1

    I'm calling it now.

    They are going to put some crappy unremastered version onto this DVD as a bonus, and when people complain that their 1996 VHS version looks better, they will rerelease the THX version on the next DVD set.

  166. Glad I waited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the few times I've felt good about being too poor to run out and buy something... I never liked the "revised version" prefering my memories of the movies I saw in the theaters when they first came out. So I'll go and buy the original Star Wars and avoid all the others and save my bucks for my insanely expensive health insurance.

  167. The end is nigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am waiting for a Fight Club 2 with kids beating up each other and a pg-13 rating to finally bring about the apocalypse.

    Not only that, it's a musical.

  168. Blakes 7 better than Star Wars!!!! by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    Ever since the last 3 films and Lucas bastardizing the Original Trilogy I would have to say that the old BBC series Blakes 7 is far superior now. In Blakes 7 you got wobbly consoles and cheap ass special effects and spaceships made out of paper mache, but Kerr Avon always shot anyone who looked at him wrong pre-emptively and didn't need an excuse to shoot unlike post Lucas meddling Han Solo.

    You had a Freedom fighter, a Cold Hearted Rational Computer Expert, a Thief, a Smuggler, a guy a big as a Wookie but more understandable, a Telepath, and a ships cmputer and later on a "brain in a box" that was just as ruthless as the computer expert. And Blakes 7 came out the same year as Star Wars. Blake was a freedom fighter like Luke Skywalker, but he had to fight Servelan and the Federation and Servelan could kick the living shit outta anakin skywalker in high heels and look beutiful doing so. Plus the Liberator could easily outrun the Mill Falcon.

    Sadly Blakes 7 has become better than Star Wars ever since Lucas has Monkied around with it.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  169. HD/Blue Ray backers missed a "killer app" chance by ysaric · · Score: 1

    If either or both of the sponsors of the HD or Blue Ray DVD standards/manufacturers could have convinced George Lucas to hold off until players were really commercially available and for Lucas to only release this set on HD and/or Blue Ray DVD, that would have been a huge boost to those hardware manufacturers. An opportunity missed--I certainly would have bought one of those players earlier than I would have otherwise for the sake of an OT theatrical release DVD set.

    --
    Happy goldfish bowl to you.
  170. Re:Don't get too proud of this technological terro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a bonus, you just might get a copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special.

    You misspelled "divine retribution for copyright infringement."

  171. No, it's not the same by tilleyrw · · Score: 1

    In this version, Greedo shoots first.

    Without Han shooting first, in a preemptive strike, most of the tension (what there is) is removed and the scene exists just long enough to tug one out to future thoughts of Natalie Portman.

    --
    This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
  172. Truly Episode IV? by SoulMaster · · Score: 1

    So here is the REAL question... when the Original release hit the theaters, it didn't say "Episode IV" or "A New Hope" anywhere, not in the scroll text, not on the posters... it was just "Star Wars". The movie did so well, that Lucas decided to add that in in 1981, and release the "Episode IV: A New Hope" version once he realized that the budgets for his sequels were in the bag.

    So I ask you this:

    IV or no IV? If it's there, or says "A New Hope" anywhere, it STILL isn't the original.

    From IMDB Alternate versions for SW:

    When the original theatrical version was first released, it was simply titled Star Wars.The opening crawl was changed to "Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope" during the 1981 re-release. According to Sterling Hedgpeth, Lucasfilm film archivist: "I found a box with all the positive elements for the 'revised' opening crawl, and the assorted trim boxes are dated from October through December 1980. This, then, is consistent with the view that Episode IV: A New Hope was added for the first time to the opening crawl for the April 10, 1981 re-release."

  173. Re:thats' the worst idea since greedo shooting fir by Kelson · · Score: 1

    I think the main problems people have with it are:

    1. The stated reason was to make Han seem less cold-blooded...but under the circumstances, it was pretty clearly a shoot-or-be-shot situation. Particularly in a rough-and-tumble frontier town, it was self-defense.
    2. At that distance, how could Greedo possibly miss?

    So the change didn't improve anything (even for the stated purpose) and it makes less sense than the original version. It amounts to a self-Bowdlerization of the film, like Spielberg converting guns to walkie-talkies in the re-release of E.T.

  174. Sick of It by majorthomme · · Score: 1

    Lucas will burn in a special place in hell. The special effects, while revolutionary at the time, will probably make your eyes bleed in HD

  175. Next Stop, Terminator! by WillyPete · · Score: 1

    The "Collector's Edition" of Terminator (if you think T2 was better or T3 WASN'T a sick travesty, you should know better) editted the sound of Arnold's .45 so it sounds like it's got a suppressor on it, ruining the scene where he kills the first Sarah Conner.

    Han shot first, and Arnold's .45 is LOUD!

    --
    Shaw's Principle: Build a system even a fool could use, and only a fool would want to use it.
  176. this and that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, the thought Lucas revisiting the original series and adding embellishments to the films doesn't bug me. Any by embellishments I mean updating the original sfx shots to bring them in line with the prequel trilogies, particularly ep3. Should be relatively easy to do that, and it seems like Lucas thinks the idea of watching all six films in sequence is a good idea. However, the simplistic, low-tech space battle scenes in the original series are going to look awkward and pale when it's their turn to be viewed in sequence. Adding in extra ships, etc., to give the original series sfx shots their own sense of grandeur and spectacle wouldn't be a bad thing. Just don't screw with the Death Star trench footage at the end of ep6. Leave that alone.

    What I don't mean by embellishments are additions, alterations or distractions to the story itself. Examples of that would include the much maligned Solo/Gweedo alteration, or the addition of the uninformative, useless Solo/Jabba conversation where the falcon was docked. Just because you can do it doesn't mean you should.

  177. It wasn't the plot it was the SPECIAL EFFECTS by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, Lucas is no literary great. The plot of the original episodes is pretty thin. But what made it great was the (then) revolutionary special effects. Who's mouth didn't drop open when the huge empire ship first crawled across the big screen? Previously, you just didn't see sci-fi effects where you couldn't tell the ship was a pie plate on a string! I remember when it was shown in ONE theater for a YEAR (and this was a major metropolitan area) before it came out in the area--so expectations were high.

    It was great, Luke even drove a flying car of sorts.

    But the plot was classic: Orphaned boy goes off to seek adventure, meets wise man and a pirate, falls for princess (until he find she's his twin sister) and saves the universe.

    But 20 years later those thin plots (in the later films) are not going to work. The special effects are routine. Of course we're still going to be nostalgic about the first 3, but don't be surprised when your kids shrug and say, "What's the big deal?"

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
  178. George Lucas is a damned liar by Stoolio · · Score: 1

    Go to the book store and pick up a copy of "Splinter of the Minds Eye". Read the Forward George Lucas wrote. He talks about all the other prequels and sequels he planned to make... and compare that to his rantings a few years ago about "I never said it would be nine movies... I always knew Luke and Leia were brother and sister" He had some of his best people quit him while making Jedi because he took a hatchet to the original story so he could quit doing Star Wars and move on to other things. He even made the comment once that he could have directed Empire as well as Irwin Kershner. Is this why he ruined the end of Empire with that damned 'we needed to show Vader getting on his shuttle, flying to his Star Destroyer, getting off the shuttle as a reception committee is there to greet him so no one would be confused'? I don't listen to anything that comes out of that ego maniac's mouth anymore. George Lucas is just plain old full of shit.

  179. Threepio's cut scene by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    My LaserDisc has a scene with Threepio in the control room telling Ben, "artoo will try to make the precise location up here on the computer" or something and they flash through a bunch of 2d schematics on the screen. At least one other version I've seen has that version cut out. Does the "remake" have it?

    The LaserDisc jacket also talks about Ben saving Luke from the Jawas. Interesting, that.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  180. 2004 DVD fix? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I see that these classic versions are only available as a set with the 2004 DVD editions.

    I'm wondering, with the extra time they have had this time if they will take a bit of effort to fix the stuff-ups that occured the first time around. Mr "Three days and 600 Macs" Lowry Digital made some rather embarrasing cock-ups in the 2004 release.

    To name the top ones:

    1. Terrible lightsabre reproduction due to improperly calibrated colour correction. See First shot inside Millennium Falcon with Luke practising his sabre skills. His "fathers lightsabre" is green. Check out the ROTJ Luke/Vader battle. Vaders sabre changes from light pink to deep red continuously. I don't think Lowry grasped that irrespective of the ambient lighting a lightsabre always saturates the frame.

    2. Music in ANH has rear channels reversed. Note that doesn't mean the voices or FX are reversed, just the music. If your sound system is good enough to pick up where instruments are placed in the 'room' this channel reversal ruins the whole effect.

    3. Sound levels have been altered, with a bias towards FX. In the Battle of Yavin at some points the music is almost inaudiable.

    4. Not a Lowry issue, but please put back "You're lucky you don't taste too good" and "Bring my shuttle" in ESB. Lucas has said they had just grabbed the wrong archive tape at some point and gotten a different take so this one shouldn't be too hard if the archives are still intact.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  181. Kinda like this? by gibson042 · · Score: 1
  182. Now if we can just get a DVD or VHS version of ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... Who Framed Roger Rabbit with the Yosemite Sam speech uncensored.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  183. The DVDs by Trogre · · Score: 1

    There's .... too many of them!

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  184. Luke's Hat by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Isn't Luke's hat just like one of the goofy peasants in The Hidden Fortress? I can't seem to find a still online from the beginning, so I may be misremembering.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  185. Premptive Blaster Doctrine by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to watch Slashdotters support Han and bash the Preemptive War Doctrine all at once. Let the fun begin.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Premptive Blaster Doctrine by Zillatron · · Score: 1
      It's an issue of entertainment versus reality for me. I love my entertainment dark, twisted, and surprising. My reality can be so unimaginably boring that no one I love dies, needs an intervention, or falls desperately short of money for years and I just don't mind. To spice things up I can turn to my entertainment.

      Believable interpersonal evil is one of the most engaging things I experience in the realm of entertainment: Pedro the Lion opens a song with the lyrics

      Bloodstains on the carpet
      Bloodstains on my hands
      Drag her towards the kitchen
      so I can hide the evidence
      The scene they describe through the song and the reasons for it are specific, personal and seemingly real. The song is utterly gripping. I severly doubt David Bazan endorses murder as a method of keeping secrets, but the song is utterly gripping. A circumstance such as this in real life would be abominable.

      Han shooting first is satisfying and right. GWB shooting first makes me ill.

    2. Re:Premptive Blaster Doctrine by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      I can't wait to watch Slashdotters support Han and bash the Preemptive War Doctrine all at once. Let the fun begin.

      Why, since the two have nothing to do with eachother. If Han was a PNAC neocon, he'd be hunting down and killing anyone that looked like a bounty hunter before they could open their mouths.

  186. We have the technology by simplemachine · · Score: 1
    Once these DVD hit the shelfs some dedicated fan will create a fan version of the films. Now that all resources are available in digital format.
    Thats the version I am waiting for.

    Made to order Star Wars !
    I'll take the orginal release with extra battle of Yavin footage please.
  187. Wake me up.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when all six movies are released together. Of course, the price will probably be ludicrous.

  188. Re:Don't get too proud of this technological terro by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    I'm just glad to be able to buy them legally... I have the original trilogy as it was on DVD, in three different forms by way of Fan Preservation efforts. The quality is suprisingly good, and it's great to be able to enjoy them as they were, but I always wanted to really own them, to have a real copy of them. And now I can.

    Seeing as all the fan efforts are sourced largly from the same Laserdiscs anyways, this should at least be going right to the source they were mastered from, so a good generation better in quality.

    As for the Dolby 2.0 sound... That's how it was. I don't want him remastering it. I want to be able to SEE and HEAR it the way it was in 1977, to be able to ooh and ahh at what was accomplished in a SciFi film in the year of my birth. (it was made in 1976, so it matches with my birthyear, not the release year!).

    I'm excited.

    And I'm happy to be getting the 'redux' versions as well. I have no issue with directors making updates... As long as you can get the originals... and now we can, so I'm happy to have both.

    Hurray!

  189. BLASPHEMY! by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    Kind of expensive to buy a new set to just fix the Greedo thing, and perhaps restore the nipple.

    I'm actually glad that the Ewok dance number was removed in Jedi - I still think they were worse than Jar-Jar (DOUBLE BLASPHEMY), so I must be one of a handful that likes the remakes for the most part. (BURN THE BLASPHEMER!)

  190. Haw Haw, Joke's on you! by T_ConX · · Score: 1

    I'm so hardcore, I didn't even bother buying the bastardized original trilogy when it came out on DVD! I was pissed off THAT MUCH, and that was before I even heard they replaced Anakin's Force Ghost in RotJ...

    I resisted the temptation to give myself the Dark side... and now my foresight has rewarded me!

  191. I didn't like it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    too much talky. There's the old saying show don't tell. I don't know, it just seemed a lot like the kinda crap that eps I, II and III where full of (especially II). Pointless crap that belonged on the editing room floor. Still cool to see though.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  192. Re:Don't get too proud of this technological terro by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't you just evenly split the surround track between the two rear channels?

  193. Re:I want the Columbine version by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    Bah! I want the game version so that I - as Han Solo, of course - can enter the tavern, walk up to the bar, and then calmly shoot the bartender in the face. Then I can quckly shoot some innocent civilians as they stare at me in shock and disbelief, until some of the other "scum and villany" decide they should do something. At which time I would start shooting wildly at them as I duck for cover behind the bar. With any luck, I could get a crossfire going, and they would all be shooting each other until imperial stormtroopers start blasting their way in through the throng of escaping civilians choking the only exit.

    I could then ensure the deaths of Greedo, Obi Wan, Luke Skywalker, Chewbacca, that fucking band, as many stormtroopers as managed to force their way into the bar - and of course, myself - by cooking off a couple of thermal detonators and going sapper on the stormtroopers while screaming "may the force be with you, motherfuckers!"

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  194. The missing one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas: These are the releases you are looking for.

  195. Re:Don't get too proud of this technological terro by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    *LOL* Yeah, it _is_ that bad.

  196. Re:thats' the worst idea since greedo shooting fir by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

    1. The stated reason was to make Han seem less cold-blooded

    But it's good that he's cold-blooded at that point at least, it was him and chewwie out for themselves and their money and nobody else... show's character development throughout the trilogy when he begins to fight for someone other than just himself. (but we all know that)

  197. You are not human. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Very few things leave a lasting impression as seeing for the first time the starships on screen back then.

    Or the battle in the Death Star.

    Call it nostalgia, but that cinematic experience did not exist before Star Wars.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.