Slashdot Mirror


Abit's New Motherboard Lays On The Ports

An enthusiastic reader submits: "Possibly the most innovative motherboard to be released in years, Abit's MAX series intends to dive headfirst into the next generation of computing, leaving legacy ports behind in their dust. Hardcoreware.net has the first full review of this board, which has support for 10 USB devices and 12 (YES, 12) IDE devices." I wish it had even more built-in USB ports, but six is a good start.

657 comments

  1. IDE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I want SCSI.

    1. Re:IDE? by Zenjive · · Score: 1

      Why is that off-topic?
      It's not my AC post, btw, but 12 IDE? Seriously, if I needed more than 4, I'd go for SCSI, maybe leave the cdrom on IDE.

      --


      A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with. - Tennessee Williams
    2. Re:IDE? by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      It really depends on your needs.

      Fast, cheap, (pretty) reliable.

      http://www.bedford.smythco.com/storage/

      43Megs/sec write, 128 Megs/sec read. 1.9TB. With IDE. 1/3rd the cost of SCSI. We built two of them for extra reliability and still saved money over SCSI. Even if a whole unit fails, we are still up and running.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:IDE? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Oh, the reason the benchmarks on the page are slower than the ones quoted here was because of a kernel layer issue in 2.4.17 that was fixed in 2.4.18. It was causing a bottleneck.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:IDE? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Who is the butt wipe that moderated this offtopic? I too want SCSI for forkin' out loud!

  2. Funny.... by z84976 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And after all these years, i'm just NOW finally finding a need for more than the standard two serial ports! (x10 controller, ups, smartcard device, etc)

    1. Re:Funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any fairly modern device will use USB for those things instead of serial ports.

    2. Re:Funny.... by east_bay_pete · · Score: 1

      You can buy a Serial->USB adapter.

      Serial ports are no longer necessary, even if you have serial devices.

    3. Re:Funny.... by AmPz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A PC without RS232 ?! Now, the RS232 is probably the industrys most common interface. It's clean, it's simple, it's fast (using proper interrupts, compared to USB style). They claim that this board is aimed at the geek market. Ok... Let me ask one thing... the USB interface, is it amined at the geek market? Noo, it's supposed to simlify things for non geeks. Geeks work closer to the research at university's and the industry. You wount find USB in either places. Geeks use real ports, like the RS232, RS485 (a great multidrop interface that supports up to 10Mbit and 1km long wires!, and is as cheap and simple as RS232, but sadly enough it is only used in the industry) I consider myself fairly geeky, I'am a hardware designer and embedded software programmer. Ths USB is a insanely complex interface software wise, it consumes lot's of CPU power since it lacks DMA support (everything except USB and the floppy has DMA theese days), and it sucks at realtime applications (anyone with a USB mouse knows that). I don't want this board. And I'd advise anyone against buying it, since it lacks proper ports. The only ones that might want this board are OEM's (everything integrated, and only USB ports so that stupid users don't get confused by all the ports) Oh... Yes... There is another niche.. It might get the warez server market because of all the IDE chanels.

    4. Re:Funny.... by z84976 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's the kicker.... with $5 worth of parts from Radio Shack and an afternoon's ingenuity (even for a non-programming geek), you can still do something USEFUL with rs232c. Gotta love it. Try that with USB.

    5. Re:Funny.... by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why not just get a "USB TO SERIAL CONVERTER DB25M", its even supported under linux. I wanted to do this for a bbs, but the price per unit 45 bux was a little expensive.

    6. Re:Funny.... by AmPz · · Score: 1

      Exactly! The RS232 is clean and simple. I really don't understand why they introduced the PS/2 mouse interface at all... The RS232 is perfectly capable of handling any mouse with any refreshrate. Only thing I can think of is the lack of a built in power supply in the RS232 port (might be a problem for power hungry optical mice). But if that's the only problem, why not make a extended RS232 interface? As for the paralell port, well... in EPP or ECP mode it's actually sometimes faster than USB 1.0 And it's really easy to work with.

    7. Re:Funny.... by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not? Let's repeat your parent post, but with your suggestion added:

      "Here's the kicker.... with $5 worth of parts from Radio Shack, a $45 converter for each serial port you need, and an afternoon's ingenuity (even for a non-programming geek), you can still do something USEFUL with rs232c. Gotta love it. Try that with USB"

      I don't want to spend $150 or whatever on a motherboard, and then spend another $50 for basic functionality. I'm sure Abit knows their target market, and I'm sure I'm not in it.

      -Paul

    8. Re:Funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good points, but what do you mean by "anyone with a USB mouse knows that"? I have one and it works just as good as a PS2 one. Same with my USB joystick. If there is a difference, you're the only one I've heard that can tell.

      Have you ever actually used a USB input device, or are you just spouting off nonsense based on a bias against newer easier to use technology?

    9. Re:Funny.... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      I dont have a need for rs232 on my workstation, thou I do need it on my ppp/firewall box. The only rs232 connection I had was a modem, and not that I use ethernet no need for it. Plus there are alot of USB modems on the market.

    10. Re:Funny.... by VAXman · · Score: 2

      Now, the RS232 is probably the industrys most common interface.

      I'd say Ethernet is probably more universal. But they're close.

      It's clean, it's simple, it's fast (using proper interrupts, compared to USB style).

      Now, this I disagree with. About 10 years ago, a computer store guy let me borrow book which was called, jokingly as he said, "RS-232 Made Simple". That book was something like 1000 pages of pure RS-232 hairiness. Anything but simple! I have more headaches with RS-232 than any other hardware. Every system has its own proprietary interface (isn't that what RS-232 is supposed to solve?!) and you have to make some weird custom cable for each configuration you want.

    11. Re:Funny.... by Erik+Fish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amen, my brother!

      I've been hating on USB ever since it came out and gotten lots of funny looks for it from so-called performance junkies but the fact is it DOES hog CPU time that could be better put to use rendering my graphics.

      The drawback you didn't mention was the fact that built-in peripherals are an extremely Bad Thing. What happens when Abit stops making drivers? What if their drivers suck ass from the beginning? Give me name-brand components and plenty of slots to put them in, thankyouverymuch.

    12. Re:Funny.... by p0d · · Score: 1

      Serial ports are still used if you have the Martin LightJockey DMX lighting control software installed and use the 2532 interface, which goes in through the serial port....basically LJ sucks without a 2532, so it's kind of a necessity. Though LJ doesn't need the latest and greatest PC for operation, I've seen it run just fine on a P-II 333.

    13. Re:Funny.... by marko123 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What do you mean, "it lacks DMA support?" My Dad uses DMA to get his assembly language microphone drivers to work better with USB.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    14. Re:Funny.... by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      For any of us doing embedded development, legacy ports are a MUST. Most emulators and eval boards use at least the serial port, if not both the serial port AND the parallel port. Hell, I had to buy a card to add a couple more RS232 ports to my PC because the two on my motherboard weren't enough. Oh well, hopefully the other manufacturers won't be dropping those ports too soon.

      BTW, did anyone look at those benchmarks? They weren't impressive. Why would anyone shell out the cash for that board?

    15. Re:Funny.... by TummyX · · Score: 2

      So go out and by a USB -> RS232 adapter.

    16. Re:Funny.... by IronChef · · Score: 2

      But those gadgets require drivers... ugh. That link you gave mentioned Windows XP drivers -- in beta even. Blech. I'd prefer to keep some old fashioned serial ports around for geek stuff. GPS, police scanner, ham radio, smart card stuff, old Palm Pilots, Philips Pronto, and a mess of other projects I am eying. I could easily use 5 serial ports.

    17. Re:Funny.... by fyonn · · Score: 1

      if you don't like the onboard components then disable them and buy your own, seems simple enough.

      dave

    18. Re:Funny.... by andrewscraig · · Score: 1

      Great idea...until you run out of PCI slots - this board only has Three! So I replace the sound card with a SoundBlaster Audigy, drop in a SCSI card so that my ZIP drive will work. If I needed to replace both the Firewire and Ethernet for whatever reason I'm SOL. My m/b at home has a few features like onboard sound, but I disabled them, and live off the 6 PCI slots that it has instead. Flexibility is definately a good thing!

    19. Re:Funny.... by bjb · · Score: 1
      What bothers me more is that I just bought a new Dell Dimension 4400 recently, and found that the machine has only 1 RS232 port on the back! Ok, so I have a relatively useless Winmodem built into the machine (don't need it; but do these things even take up a COM port?), but I DO have a few RS232 devices lying around like a Palm Pilot, Blackberry, a REAL modem (USRobotics v.Everything), Firecracker interface, ad-nauseum.


      So if the argument is the interrupts, etc.. the lack of ISA slots eliminates most of the IRQ problems, no? I believe PCI and USB only swallow one each.


      Oh, my hardware-fu is fading these days...

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    20. Re:Funny.... by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Well, since all FireWire is OHCI-compliant, no need for drivers, the OS will support any compiant card, The Ethernet is a generic RTL8129/8139 Chip, which is supported natively by any OS, same thing for the USB ports, so the only thing is the Audio and HighPoint RAID controller, both of which are supported by the chip manufacturer in question. Personally the only thing that would be going into the slots for me are a Pro-Audio card, Second Ethernet and SCSI (Because IDE RAID blows chunks for mor than 1 drive per channel), so what do I care about only 3 slots, I don't need any more.There is no real problem with onboard stuff these days.

      The Crazy Finn

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    21. Re:Funny.... by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Try that with USB.

      Well, the cable is more than $5, but USB cable would serve very well as a garrote.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    22. Re:Funny.... by fyonn · · Score: 1

      flexibility is a good thing, but whats flexible here is the market. it's nice to see the PC world making an attempt at leaving legacy stuff behind. now perhaps if abit had left off some a usb controller or an ide controller or two then perhaps you could have some PCI slots, but how many PCI slots do even abit's target market use?

      okay, lets see, you'll need a gfx card but that lives on agp. sound card is likely, thats one slot down, ethernet? well, I think most ppl will be happy to use the onboard, it's a 10/100 afaik and perhaps others might perform better, but who'll notice? scsi, this is more likely that ethernet imho.

      what else are ppl likely to want to put in? not too much and there is a spare slot. now I'm not saying it is perfect for everyone, but thats true of every motherboard. they all have their quirk's that don't suit someone but I think abit have done alright here. it's a departure from the norm but thats good. otherwise we'd all be using intel boards.

      if it doesn't suit, get a different one, but I don;t think it should be bashed just becasue it doesn't suit *you*. it's ncie to see something different and it may well be the way everyone goes in time.

      I would have been interested if they had tested the board with 12 drives plugged in as well as a pair of firewire devices and all 10 usb ports being filled with bus powered zip 250's all whirring in unison, with a power sucking 3d gfx card in of course, could it take the power drain?

      dave

    23. Re:Funny.... by decoydog · · Score: 1

      unless this is the only motherboard available in the world I don't see where you have an issue. You choose what you need. I don't see anyone going ape-sh!t about an AMD motherboard when they use an Intel CPU.

    24. Re:Funny.... by farnham · · Score: 1

      Dude...
      THis thign has four channel RAID. I think you're most likely going to be happy with four raided drives, and four other periphials. Hell, you could have six ide components each with it's own channel. So what are you complaining about?
      Do you REALLY want to buy harddrives that cost three times as much?
      I wish you luck

      --
      pending committee review
    25. Re:Funny.... by realnowhereman · · Score: 1
      Agreed, my legacy ports are used for
      • PIC development
      • 8051 development
      • Z80 development
      • AVR development
      • Rabbit development
      • My gameboy programmable cartridge
      • Talking to my Nokia phone
      • Null modem cable for developing embedded software using a simulator
      I think I'm with you on this one.
      --
      Carpe Daemon
    26. Re:Funny.... by marko123 · · Score: 1

      Why is that funny? It's true :)
      Wanna feel powerless?
      Get out-geeked by your parents.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  3. Wow! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2, Funny

    With 12 IDE ports, it has nearly as much capacity as my 2-channel SCSI card!

    Hope you enjoy IRQ-sharing...

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Wow! by cwebster · · Score: 1

      support for 12 IDE devices == 6 IDE ports.

      overkill imho, if you want that many drives, scsi is the way to go.

    2. Re:Wow! by ergo98 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why would SCSI be the way to go? This argument has played out dozens of times, but given that IDE controllers are proven, extremely fast, and a dime a dozen, and IDE hardware can be had extremely cost effectively, I'll stick with IDE thanks (despite the hip elusive performance promise of SCSI).

    3. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because even 2 IDE drives on a chain is trouble.

    4. Re:Wow! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

      Actually, I also recommend 3ware cards if you have a lot of cheap IDE disks and can't afford to lose data. You can put together a terabyte of RAID 5 disk with 8 IDE drives and one 6810.

      I also recommend backups. Lots and lots of backups.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    5. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My IDE beats your stinking SCSI or FC any day of the week! With all the money I saved, I can buy 4x the number of drives, and on this board I can put one on each channel, stripe 'em and get almost as much actual throughput as that SCSI does without loading my CPU as well! Hmm, strike that, I'll stick with a real motherboard with a real SCSI controller.

    6. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Given that the argument has played out "dozens" (as you put it) of times, why do you think real computing shops use SCSI, and idiots raised on the IBM PC as the brilliance of design think that IDE can't be surpassed.

    7. Re:Wow! by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "but given that IDE controllers are proven, extremely fast, "
      SCSI is also proven, and even faster.

      "and a dime a dozen"
      I am going to assume your talking about drives because you can get a UWide SCSI controller that supports 15 devices for about 25 bucks.

      yes, SCSI disks are more expensive, but a Corvette is more expensive then a camero. you get what you pay for.

      Your performance is really going to take a hit if you start loading up the IDE channels. The SCSI performance is not elusive, its proven. I have a cr-rw and a dvd player and 2 hardisks and I can play DVD, burn a cd, and run a compile in the background. My CPU usage hardly rises.
      As far as RAID goes, you can RAID SCSI as well.

      I suggest you try programming to both, then tell me which one is better.

      but hey, you want to use broken SCSI.... i mean, IDE drive, no skin off my nose.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Wow! by ergo98 · · Score: 0

      Who exactly said that "IDE can't be surpassed"? Jesus, hop off the soapbox preacher because you're sadly misdirected: My point is that simply saying "SCSI GOOD! IDE BAD!" is pathetic and ridiculous, and indeed in the workstation/desktop market SCSI has largely disappeared because it simply doesn't prove out to be superior in real world situations. And somehow, maybe I'm crazy, I really don't think that "real computing shops" are looking at getting a couple of these Abit boards to replace their servers, and given that we're talking about the Abit board, hence it isn't contextually relevant.

    9. Re:Wow! by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hence the value of having multiple controllers : Each then has a dedicated pipe to the controller all to themselves, which is a superb reason to have more than the standard 2 controllers (so your CD-R, each of two hard drives, and DVD-ROM drive can all have their own controller).

    10. Re:Wow! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      overkill imho, if you want that many drives, scsi is the way to go.

      Depends what you want that many drives for... Besides, firewire is just as good, as far as usefulness vs. price.

    11. Re:Wow! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Insightful
      This argument has played out dozens of times, but given that IDE controllers are
      • proven - which is why they're used in high-availability, fault-tolerant servers the world over-- oh, wait. That's SCSI. Can you hot-swap IDE? Without voiding your warranty?
      • extremely fast - which is why the best-performing hard drives are IDE-- oh, wait, they're SCSI, too. For a fun experiment to do in your spare time, find me a 15k RPM IDE drive. Wait, no, find me just a 10k one. Oh, wait, no, find me simply a 7200 RPM IDE drive with 8MB of cache onboard.
      • and a dime a dozen - Okay, you've got me, there.
      • and IDE hardware can be had extremely cost effectively - It may be cheap, but is it cost-effective?

      I'll stick with IDE thanks (despite the hip elusive performance promise of SCSI)

      A promise which it makes good on. IDE fulfills the "cheap", and, sometimes the "good" of "cheap, good, and fast. Pick any two." SCSI fulfills "good" and "fast". You really do get what you pay for.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    12. Re:Wow! by Evil_Furby · · Score: 0

      http://www.westerndigital.com/products/products.as p?DriveID=27 There's your 7200RPM 8MB Cache IDE drive.

      --
      OH NOES! TEH INTARWEB IS BORKEN!
    13. Re:Wow! by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2
      Can you hot-swap IDE? Without voiding your warranty?


      I have read of people hot swapping the IDE drive of an X-Box in order to have the X-Box unlock the drive and then swap it to their computer so they can hack it.

      I also personally once had a CD-ROM drive that was so old (before there were good standards) if it was plugged in it would totally freeze my motherboard. Now I can't say if the drive was harmed or not but I had a bit of fun pluggin in the drive, freezing my computer, and then unplugging it and my computer unfroze, and the IDE controller on the motherboard wasn't hurt...

      I don't know about warranties though... Who needs 'em?

      Tim
      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    14. Re:Wow! by z84976 · · Score: 2

      Two channel scsi? I assume here you mean 2 channel SCSI-1. All "modern" wider scsi implementations will give you room for 15 devices. Of course, there's always relics like my old three narrow-channel adaptec (21 device total) which was sold to me BRAND new very cheaply some years ago because it was "only supported under novell." Heh. Novell and Linux, suckers...

    15. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope you enjoy IRQ-sharing...

      Two of the ports are via the southbridge, like just about every other pc motherboard on the planet. The other 4 are from a single controller chip on board. So, ignoring your phobia of sharing IRQs, it's going to come out to the same number of lines as your SCSI card would. The SCSI premium is just too steep for anything aimed at any kind of mass-consumer market.

    16. Re:Wow! by shuffle40 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually you can hot swap any drive. You must disconnect the signal before the power, though. That is why hot swappable drives have a special interface with the signal pins shorter than the power pins. Doing this properly does NOT void warranty!

      C'mon, if you are going to geek out and trump the performance of SCSI, get the facts straight!

      I agree with the original poster. That is not to say SCSI can't outperform IDE. But where is the pricepoint? IDE is catching up, and for the cost, I would say is already there. You need the best of the best, go with SCSI. You need a fast drive at a decent price, look IDE.

      It also helps that today's PC's have oodles of processor left over to help out w/IDE bus transfers. Obviously that influences my statements above too. If that wern't the case, the I/O handling that SCSI does would be invaluable, as it once was. I remember how many coasters I made on my first IDE burner...

    17. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes but you can't just say that you spend more money for 1 SCSI than 1 IDE drive and that the savings go no where because that money could be put into other things to improve the overall performance.

      SCSI drives come out at a faster speed because the market demands more of them. There's no technical reason why SCSI drives come out at faster speeds than IDE.

      Now I use IDE (a Baracudda 3), because I'm a home user and it doesn't really matter to me. SCSI users do have a better technology but they're uniformly awful at stating general-purpose benchmarks between IDE and SCSI.

    18. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up the recent discussion on the kernel dev list where people who _really_ understand IDE concluded that you can not hotswap it.

    19. Re:Wow! by archmedes5 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the complete, utter rats nest six ide cables (even rolled) will form. You can fill a chain of 15 scsi device with 2 (possibly one) cable(s).

      Irq's aren't quite the problem they used to be, though, especially on newer single proc motherboards where an apic (24 irqs rather then 16) is included and is likely to be active in the NT series (NT, 2000, XP) and linux operating systems.

      SCSI is built to be hotswappable.

      I admit that SCSI can be a royal pain in the ass to set up though.

      I can't see anyone using IDE in a mission critical situation high capacity server though, although It would perfect for makeing a homebased server.

    20. Re:Wow! by packeteer · · Score: 1

      how often do you use your corvette anyway??? how many roads near you have a 140mph speed limit??? my point is that you dont very often need SCSI... as for programming it is VERY cheap to cimply get a bunch of ram and create a ramdisk... do you use more than 2 gigs at once programming... not really... is it cheap for 2 gigs of ram... yes... so if you use scsi fine... but what if you dont want to clutter up your computer with all those cables... maybe your into pc mods... maybe you want EVERYTHING onboard... this mobo is for you... i know i chose the K7S5A cause it has enough onboard that i dont need extra cables... makes it real easy to install some fans and overclock my cpu... also notice how far the agp is away from the pci cards... this will make it so you could put a freakin cpu fan on your videocard if you wanted... this thing looks to physically be an overclocking beast

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    21. Re:Wow! by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Hence the value of having multiple controllers

      Most of which are useless since IDE cables over 18" are out of spec and therefore generally unreliable. With cables that short it can become a nightmare fitting more than 5 or 6 drives in a system (I've tried and failed in my full tower case -- fortunately I had SCSI CD burners so I just moved the IDE stuff to the lower bays).

      Not to mention that having 7 drive cables hanging about your system make it very unwieldly to work inside.

      With SCSI you get cables long enough to stretch to the top of the tallest full tower case, and with 7 drives on one cable you don't end up with a rat's nest of cables.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    22. Re:Wow! by Sunda666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SCSI rocks, but until they charge a decent price for a SCSI drive (read: close to the one of a decent ATA133 7200RPM), i will stay away from it. God dammit, I can buy a 80GB ide drive for the price of a 18GB SCSI one. Something is wrong here.

      --


      ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
    23. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just hit the nail on the preverbial head. Most computers don't have alot of PCI expansion, and if they do, it's 33mhz/32bit. Throw another cart on there for your seperate controllers, ethernet, sound, and on 98% of the consumer boards, you have *no* expansion left. So, with my fairly standard SCSI card, I can put 14 devices to use (who needs over 7 anyway, except for big workstations and servers--applications which will really benefit from SCSI anyway)

      The one exception I have against this rule are some of those 8port IDE switched RAID controllers. They are damn fast, and have 66/64 interfaces. *shrug*

    24. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say you'll need a warranty when you fry your harddrive from hot swapping it...

    25. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, all these posters claiming scsi is the greatest thing since sliced bread. It all depends on your problem domain.

      I work in a GIS shop where we deal with groups of hundreds of 250 to 800MB images (each) at one time.

      #1 issue that that our data is essentially accessed sequentially (or in huge blocks).

      The IT department decided to go out and purchase Fiber channel arrays and got about .5T out of the deal, price at about 10k. These are hooked up to dual 1GHz P3 systems using some serverworks mobo, again at a VERY substantial price point. Problem is that even with that, with 64b 66MHz cards the max xfer rate they're seeing is 70MB/s.

      What's sad is that I have in my development area also dual P3's with asus mobos and IDE raids and quantum drives. I'm actualy getting slightly better throughput than the fiber channel system, with a full system expenditure (with drives) of about $1500.

      Of course for the type of processing we do, almost purely sequential transfer, the SCSI advantage pretty much disappears.

      Another point about the cheapness of IDE raids: They may be slower than the SCSI ones, but I can afford to upgrade all my mass storage 4 times and still come out cheaper, and probably iteration 3 will blow the crap out the aging (but very expensive) SCSI solution.

    26. Re:Wow! by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh, wait, no, find me simply a 7200 RPM IDE drive with 8MB of cache onboard.

      While I agree that SCSI is better for servers, I can satisfy this request:

      Western Digital Caviar Special Edition 7200 Hard Drive WD1000JB

    27. Re:Wow! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Can you hot-swap IDE? Without voiding your warranty?
      Yup. Here is a hot-swap IDE drive caddy. Read the manual PDF file, and it will tell you on page 2 that it you can hot-swap drives with it.
    28. Re:Wow! by ShavenGoat · · Score: 1
      To add to your list of valid points:

      Most IDE disks have a warranty of 1 or 3 years. I have seen SCSI drives with 7 year warranties. Talk about backing up your product. Your drive will outlive your computer's useful lifetime.

    29. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude hate to say it but THEY LIE (they neglect to mention the very specialized, impossible to find and more expensive controllers needed to hot plug it safely, cant with a normal IDE)

      -c@

    30. Re:Wow! by cb0y · · Score: 0

      if scsi of 1999 was HIGH END cool/best, then todays IDE beats 1999 SCSI. So why bag IDE?

      8x 120GIG for IDE is cheaper. The platters for ide/scsi drives are identical.

    31. Re:Wow! by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      for the average, run of the mill, non-slashdot running (aka database server) geek, 2MB of cache is PLENTY. what you want to be looking at is primarily seek time, and secondly data burst transfer, THEN sustained, then wether or not it has more than 2 MB of cache.

      if you want to hear yourself think - maxtor has a 160 GB drive (ide) that runs at 5400 rpm, but only has 2 MB cache. western digital makes a line of 100 gb and 120 gb drives, that come in 2 MB and 8 MB cache sizes. i recently bought a 100 GB 2MB cache, which is plenty fast. The only time cache over about 3 or 4 MB comes in handy is on A) webservers, or B) sql-type database servers.there's a reason why people don't buy SCSI hardware for their 31337 ha>0r system - nobody needs it - ATA 100/133 is cheap, and 2/3rds the speed of SCSI for 90% of their needs.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    32. Re:Wow! by omen · · Score: 1
      Oh, wait, no, find me simply a 7200 RPM IDE drive with 8MB of cache onboard.
      WESTERN DIGITAL "SPECIAL EDITION" 120GB 7200RPM EIDE HARD DRIVE MODEL # WD1200JB .

      Available from Newegg for $210.00. Great numbers on Storage Review.

    33. Re:Wow! by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      so if you use scsi fine... but what if you dont want to clutter up your computer with all those cables... maybe your into pc mods

      You'll actually need more cables to hook up a bunch of IDE drives than to hook up a bunch of SCSI drives. IDE will only support two drives per channel, while narrow SCSI can support up to seven and wide SCSI handles up to 15 drives.

      As for riced-out PCs, I won't go there. Case cutouts and neon lights look as ridiculous on PCs as "powered by Foo" stickers, huge-ass spoilers, and fire extinguishers on the A-post look on small, underpowered cars.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    34. Re:Wow! by old7 · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait, no, find me simply a 7200 RPM IDE drive with 8MB of cache onboard.

      Take a look at the Western Digital 120 GB 7200 RPM IDE drive WITH 8MB of cache...

      On the other hand I do agree wholeheartly that SCSI is the way to go for fault tolerent server applications.

    35. Re:Wow! by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I admit that SCSI can be a royal pain in the ass to set up though.

      Where does this myth come from? SCSI is only marginally more difficult to get running than IDE:

      • Make sure every device has a unique ID.
      • Make sure termination is enabled only at the ends of the chain.
      • Make sure at least one device supplies termination power (most SCSI cards do, but some of the cheaper ones don't).
      • For maximum performance, don't mix LVD and SE devices (your LVD devices will more than likely support faster signaling rates than a single-ended interface can deliver).

      I've used SCSI devices for 12 years (started with a hard drive for my Apple IIe), and I've never run into the difficulties that some people mention.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    36. Re:Wow! by gorilla · · Score: 2
      • Make sure you sacrifice a virgin goat
    37. Re:Wow! by shuffle40 · · Score: 1

      Better hurry and tell all those people who have been successfully doing it for years this! Trust an AC to throw out a statement like that!

    38. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, retard. I point you to a reference where the issue is discussed in detail by electrical engineers and people who write IDE drivers and even sit on the fucking ATA Committees, and "shuffle40 (User #5gazillion)" dismisses it because I'm AC and his cousin Al down at the trailerpark did it once with his Gateway 2000 and nothing happened. Have fun with your ghetto hardware, kid.

    39. Re:Wow! by darc · · Score: 1

      As to the cost ratio, it really is ridiculous. SCSI drives, no matter how fast, are not made of gold. To price an 18gb scsi against a 80gb ide is just crazy. If you compare the costs, you can hook up a 7 drive (10gb disks) ide raid stripe set that will surely out perform an equivelant 100gb scsi drive.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
  4. Huh? by BrianGa · · Score: 1

    "Hardcoreware.net has the first full review of this board, which has support for 10 USB devices" "I wish it had even more built-in USB ports, but six is a good start." Am I missing something?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I missing something?

      Yes, reading the article is what you are missing.

    2. Re:Huh? by shyster · · Score: 1, Troll
      "Hardcoreware.net has the first full review of this board, which has support for 10 USB devices" "I wish it had even more built-in USB ports, but six is a good start." Am I missing something?

      Yeah, the legendary Slashdot editor's inattentiveness. This is nothing new, so move along.

    3. Re:Huh? by gregfortune · · Score: 2

      Yup, read the article. 4 of the 10 are internal.

    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize that there are jsut 6 built into the motherboard, and that the rest are available as USB headers where you can connect ports that are mounted in the front of the case or rear slots, right?

    5. Re:Huh? by robkore · · Score: 1
      "Hardcoreware.net has the first full review of this board, which has support for 10 USB devices" "I wish it had even more built-in USB ports, but six is a good start." Am I missing something?

      You are missing that link in the submission above which points to the explanation. From the article:

      Notice the complete lack of legacy ports - this includes PS/2, ATA, serial, parallel, the whole shebang! Instead, we get 4 USB 1.1 ports, 2 USB 2.0 ports, a pair of IEEE1394 FireWire ports, full analog 5.1 audio out, digital audio out, and a LAN connector.


      The site is getting sluggish now, so take my word for it.
    6. Re:Huh? by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 2

      What I don't get is the use of the word "devices". I thought you could put like 10 devices on a single USB port, assuming there's enough juice to power them all?

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    7. Re:Huh? by JesseL · · Score: 2

      I thinks it actually somthing like 127 or 255 devices per USB port. It's hard to imagine what you'd do with that many devices sharing 11Mbps though...

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    8. Re:Huh? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Note that some of the ports support USB 2.0, which is 480Mbps rather than 12. That's acceptably fast enough for most things, especially if you plug your slow stuff into the USB 1.1 ports.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    9. Re:Huh? by Johannes · · Score: 2, Informative

      127 devices per USB bus. This thing has atleast 3 busses.

      The USB 1.1 bus is 11Mbps (per bus), whereas the USB 2.0 bus is 480Mbps.

    10. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anybody know the max devices for iee1394 bus by chance?

      IIRC, transfer speeds are something like
      1394.A. = 400mbps at 4.5 meters
      1394.B. = 3.2gps at 100 meters

      secondly can somebody give an educated guess as to why firewire has not been used much for a hard drive interface?

  5. Sweet! by theVitViper · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I don't need all 5 of those Promise ATA contollers I've got!

  6. Just in case the site gets /.ed by 56ker · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's the first page: The Next Generation of motherboards...?

    Never has the announcement of a motherboard created as much buzz around the PC hardware enthusiast community as the Abit "MAX" series of motherboards (something tells me they really wanted to call it "Matrix" instead). This line of boards, available on both Athlon and Pentium 4 platforms, is Abit's attempt at taking motherboards one step into the next generation, leaving things like legacy ports in its dust.


    Windows 2000/XP/ME only. Win98 users need not apply.

    How significant is this step though? If you've been paying attention to the hype surrounding these boards, you might think that it is a giant leap for motherboard kind. We're going to find out if this is the case, or if the MAX series is rather a baby step.

    Giant leap or baby step, one thing is for certain, the AT7, Abit's first board in the MAX lineup, is definitely one of the most unique boards you'll see today. The AT7 uses the newest, fastest chipset for the Athlon platform, VIA's KT333. KT333 supports most of the newest features you'll need, such as native ATA/133 hard drives, onboard 5.1 audio with digital output, support for DDR333 SDRAM, and more. Abit takes that one step further, and adds a ton of integrated components intended for the next generation of computing. This includes both FireWire AND USB2.0 controller, a 4 channel ATA/133 RAID adapter (making for an unprecedented support of 10 ATA drives onboard), onboard 10/100 LAN, and MediaXP support. These would all be excellent useful addons for most boards, but that's where the MAX series is different - these aren't just addons for the motherboard, they actually replace all legacy parts on the board. Have a look!

    This is definitely the most unique ATX rear panel I've ever seen on a consumer board. Notice the complete lack of legacy ports - this includes PS/2, ATA, serial, parallel, the whole shebang! Instead, we get 4 USB 1.1 ports, 2 USB 2.0 ports, a pair of IEEE1394 FireWire ports, full analog 5.1 audio out, digital audio out, and a LAN connector. This is what really sets the MAX boards apart. It is FINALLY time to get rid of that old Dexxa ball mouse that came with your first SVGA card. While you're at it, toss out that old Dot Matrix printer, and even the $13 keyboard with the ASDFJKL: keys completely rubbed off! Abit steps into a new era of computing with the MAX boards

    There are some other noticeable differences in the board layout. First off, you are only going to get 3 PCI slots. This is because most of the peripherals that would use a PCI slot, such as the Ethernet adapter and sound card, are already onboard. Personally I've never used more than 3 PCI slots, and with this board, not a single slot it used. Yep, 3 should definitely be enough.

    Despite having all the next-gen high performance capabilities, SCSI is still absent. This proves that while the AT7 is a very high end board, it is still targeted to the consumer market. Thanks, Abit!

    1. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by 56ker · · Score: 1

      Oh that was my get out clause you see. Anyway my karma's already 33 so I'm hardly doing it for the karma.

    2. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it did, so this was the only way I was able to read it.

    3. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the second page: Got Storage?

      Have a look at the vast number of ATA connectors - 6 channels! The yellow connectors are for the Highpoint ATA/133 RAID controller (which works perfectly fine in non-RAID mode). The two higher up on the board are the natively controlled IDE channels, also supporting ATA/133. This makes for an amazing 12 possible drives without the use of a single PCI slot!

      Below the RAID channels you'll see a floppy adapter, one of the lingering legacy ports still found on this generation of MAX boards... I personally don't use a floppy drive anymore, but it will be necessary to use a floppy if you plan on installing Windows XP on a drive controlled by the Highpoint IDE. How ironic!

      Besides what I've mentioned, and the fact that there are 4 RAM slots (up to three 1GB sticks may be used at a time with non-registered RAM, four if you are using registered), the layout is pretty much standard ATX fare. There are a couple nasty layout problems though, which I'll get to later in the review.

      In addition to the 6 USB ports on the ATX rear panel (4 USB1.1 and 2 USB2.0), there are onboard connectors for 4 more USB 2.0 connectors, for a total of 10 devices! There is also an extra output for one more IEEE1394 port. The IEEE1394 controller used by the AT7 is capable of full speed 400mb/sec. So no matter what interface your advanced external peripherals are going to use, Abit definitely has you covered with the AT7.

      Once again, Abit gets unique with the AT7, this time with the bundle. Included are a set of nifty black IDE cables (3 IDE cables, 1 floppy cable). This is a great way to have some nice looking custom IDE cables without worrying about using rounded cables (IDE cables are flat for a reason you know!). Also included are a set of cable tie-downs, to aide in keeping your PC nice and tidy inside. This is a great little bundle for a motherboard! A custom ATX rear panel plate is also included of course; the one that came with your case is now officially outdated. You also get one PCI plate USB adapter, to be used on one of the USB2.0 outputs on the motherboard. I would have liked to see a pair of these, in addition to another firewire adapter, since the board supports it. Unfortunately, you're going to have to get your own this time.

      MediaXP

      One significant absence in our package (I believe Abit is going to make it an option for some retail packages) is a MediaXP panel! MediaXP is one of the great steps forward with the MAX series. Basically, it adds integrated support for various portable media, including Smart Media, Compact Flash, and even Sony's Memory Stick. MediaXP also includes headphone and microphone jacks, SPDIF ports, and 2 USB ports! It is expected that most cases will start using MediaXP panels, rather than their own Mickey Mouse panels you see now. It is already beginning to look like the MAX is taking the PC a step in the right direction...

    4. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by sheetsda · · Score: 3, Insightful
      There are some other noticeable differences in the board layout. First off, you are only going to get 3 PCI slots. This is because most of the peripherals that would use a PCI slot, such as the Ethernet adapter and sound card, are already onboard. Personally I've never used more than 3 PCI slots, and with this board, not a single slot it used. Yep, 3 should definitely be enough.

      Ouch. I was loving this board until I read that. I hate integrated components. If they die, or if something faster/cooler/better comes out that doesn't leave me enough slots to upgrade, so I have to replace the motherboard. Sorry Abit, you lost my business right there.

    5. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 1
      Here's the first page: The Next Generation of motherboards...?
      Ok, bye, bye karma, but have you guys ever heard of copyright? I know we're a bunch of mp3 rippin, open-source codin, GPL copyleft luvin Linux geeks, but I think the author's copyright should be respected. Just like when I open-source my code and my copyleft should be respected.

      PK

    6. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by pangloss · · Score: 2

      yeah, and i got to page 9 of 10 before their server stopped responding :P
      just ten more seconds and i would have finished loading the last page. f*ing slashdotters :P

      anyway, here's page nine for those of you who only got to page 8. this is the "gripes"/shortcomings page. maybe someone can post pg. 10 :P

      --

      The Sound Card

      Abit chose to use VIA's next gen onboard 5.1 sound card, dubbed "Avance". It looks good on paper, being a 5.1 AC97 sound chip, with digital capabilities. Abit certainly makes use of some of the digital capabilities by putting a TOSlink Out adapter on the board, allowing you to make a digital connection to an external decoder for movies, or to a digital set of speakers. TOSlink In looks like it might be an option, but wasn't on our board.

      I have noticed that more and more board manufacturers are shying away from VIA's onboard sound as their integrated option, and going for third party options such as those by C-Media or even Creative Labs. There may be many reasons for this, and I think I may have found a few of them...

      First off, let's have a quick look at performance, using ZD's Audio WinBench 99. We are only looking at the 44 kHz tests, and only those using 32 hardware voices; basically the most demanding situations possible.

      Test A - DirectSound 44.1 kHz, 16 bit, Static, 32 Voices
      Test B - DirectSound 44.1 kHz, 16 bit, Streaming, 32 Voices
      Test C - DirectSound 3D 44.1 kHz, 16 bit, Static, 32 Voices
      Test D - DirectSound 3D 44.1 kHz, 16 bit, Streaming, 32 Voices

      Remember on this test, Lower = better. Now I am not going to go nuts and say this will give seriously hinder your performance, in fact I went through some game benchmarks with sound turned off and on, and performance differences were negligible. However it is worth noting that in the most stressful situations, the VIA onboard sound isn't quite up to the task compared to a solution like C-Media, which Shuttle has recently switched to.

      One more nasty issue I have with the sound card regards, I think, the drivers. During testing, we used a Philips MMS306 5.1 speaker set. We connected the speakers to the jacks just like on any sound card, and the sounds seemed to be coming from the wrong speakers... I used the alternate setting, using Line-In for the Centre/Woofer channel, and Line-Out for the Rear channels, and everything worked fine. It seems kind of silly that Abit ditched a parallel port to make room for some speaker outputs that are completely useless.

      The Layout

      If you have a keen eye, you might have noticed a glaring issue with the layout design of the board... I saved this for the rant page...

      That's right, the 'clip' end, where you would normally try to install the heatsink, is on the TOP of the board. When installed in a regular sized case, such as 17" or 18", it will likely be impossible to install or uninstall a heatsink - you will need to take the motherboard right out of the case if you don't have a full removable tray!

      I have seen a few boards do this before, and it always seems to be a mistake... I have no idea why Abit would consciously choose to design their board like this - it seems to go right against their usual support for the hardware community...

      If your other eye is just as keen as the first one, perhaps you noticed this:

      That's right, the memory slots are extremely close to the AGP slot, making ram installation pretty difficult with a video card installed. This is a very minor concern however, and I am not going to make much noise about this. After all, you could easily use DIMM3 and/or DIMM4 if you only have one or two stick of memory (of course even these will likely be blocked by a GeForce 4 Ti4400 or Ti4600, but then again, most memory slots will be in all likelihood). Also, most boards with 4 DIMMs tend to have this problem. It may be worth mentioning that the Shuttle AK35GTR doesn't have this problem though...

      With those rather minor gripes out of the way, let's get to the final conclusion!

    7. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Who cares about copyright when you're after karma? joke - ok? :0) Anyway I was the one who posted page 1 on the basis that I thought it would get /.ed - as the whole article is about 10 pages I'm quite within my rights to copy that much.

    8. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by elmegil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Giving up PS/2 as "legacy" is pretty much insane. There is no reasonably priced KVM switch that does BOTH USB and PS/2, and I'm not getting USB for my 486 firewall any time soon. PS/2 has PLENTY of life left in it, no matter what one mfr thinks.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    9. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by RandomCoil · · Score: 1

      By the same reasoning I suppose you think ISA still has a lot of life in it, since you can't very well put a _PCI_ network card in your 486.

      And surely the serial and parallel ports must be kept forever; god forbid the motherboard industry should invoke the wrath of case-modders around the world with their ph3ars0me LCD-hack projects (yes, my mockery of the hacks comes out of case-envy).

      Sorry to rag on you, but to suggest that it's "insane" to dump PS/2 due to the miniscule number of consumers who need cheap KVM switches seems a little silly. Personally I'm more concerned about linux support for the various peripherals -- which is also probably of relatively little concern to Abit.

    10. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Cuthalion · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are a lot of people who don't use KVM switches. Perhaps this motherboard may be useful to them.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    11. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Ozan · · Score: 2, Funny

      man telnet

    12. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ppetrakis · · Score: 1

      it doesnt have too (kvm). You can go with a nice USB KVM and pick up those little ps/2 to usb adapters as needed. It's not like they dont come with every USB mouse you buy. They cant be more than $10 each.

      Peter

      --
      www.alphalinux.org
    13. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just use the ones that came with your mouse.... I have 6 now, and I bought refurbbed keyboards and mice even.

    14. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ChadN · · Score: 2

      There are cheap dongles that allow you to attach your USB mouse to a PS/2 port, and I'm assuming they work for keyboards as well. Besides the Belkin OmniView Soho KVM switches DO allow mixing USB and PS/2 computers on the switch, and they can be found at reasonable prices.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    15. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by daniel_isaacs · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Umm, yeah. I see myself upgrading my 100Mb home network sometime soon. . .

      And better than 5.1 channel sound? Sure, but how many people really care about that?

      Right now my 5 slots are occupied by a NIC (taken care of) a Live! (taken care of) a 1394 (taken care of) a 2940U2W (down to two slots) and an IDE RAID card (taken care of).

      Hmm. Seems as though I have room to grow. Besides, we replace computers every two years anyway. You might have to upgrade the 1394 by then. But not much else. Jesus, I'd sell my soul for 10 USB ports.

      --
      - Dan I.
    16. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can get you those ports, i'll throw in an extra 20% more free, and i'll let you put them on your desktop!! no more messing around behind the computer to plug things in. and you'll have status lights as well!

      Contact me at satan@we_have_usb_hubs.com

    17. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Johannes · · Score: 1

      Those aren't USB to PS/2 convertors. They just allow you to connect a device which has been specifically designed to work over either port.

      Those aren't the devices you think they are.

    18. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >man telnet

      man r00tm3n0w

    19. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by dk379 · · Score: 1

      Of course your firewall needs a mouse connected to operate properly.

      The only drawback I see is lack of true serial port. Printers nowadays come with dual usb-and-parallel or just usb, and new mouse and keyboard can be had cheaply. (Or you can just use old 486 box as a print server.)

      But serial ports... there are convertors to usb, but they usually run around $50 a piece. A viable option would be to use multi-port serial
      board; alas, those usually come in ISA flavor, unless you want to spend $500.

    20. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Arandir · · Score: 2

      I have no problems with a PS/2-less motherboard, so long as the BIOS can detect and use my USB keyboard, and pass on the keystrokes transparently to the OS. You see, I don't use Windows. Nor do I use any of the fancy Linux distros that include every possible driver in the boot image. I need the keyboard when I install an OS, so I need the keyboard to work before the OS is installed. It's sort of a chicken-and-egg problem.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    21. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ChadN · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's an important clarificaton. I simply meant that he could get a USB keyboard and mouse (designed to work for PS/2 as well), use a KVM switch, and then use the adapter to plug into the 386 box. Although, actually, the switch probably only controls one USB port, and it may not be possible to break that into both a keyboard and mouse PS/2 connection (and the devices themselves might get confused by the switching... hmmmm).

      On the other hand, there are and will be plenty of motherboards that support PS/2, so I personally wouldn't be to bothered. I recently bought a PS/2 KVM switch, rather than a USB, and I expect I'll be using it for a long while.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    22. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      "KEYBOARD AND MOUSE CONVERTER PS2 TO USB" works just fine on KVMs.

    23. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      man ssh.


      nobody uses telnet nowadays.

    24. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe :)

    25. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      I just went to Kmart. Three 4 port USB hubs, total... $89.97.

      My soul is assessed at a slightly higher value.

    26. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by elmegil · · Score: 1

      The "converters" only work with dual purpose mice. That works on the INPUT side (using one right now actually) but not on the output to the 486.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    27. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by elmegil · · Score: 1

      may not need a mouse, but it bloody well needs a monitor and a keyboard ya think?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    28. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by John+Ineson · · Score: 1
      The whole first page.

      Just in case it gets /.ed

      Score: 5

      /. moderators never cease to amaze

    29. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by oznet · · Score: 1

      I have several 486 boards with PCI slots... ???

      I get your point though, I just had to comment on the 486/PCI thing.

      Macs seem to work fine without "lagacy" ports... no floppy drive even.

    30. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      You're not getting this motherboard for your 486 firewall either, I hope.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    31. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ddstreet · · Score: 1
      I need the keyboard when I install an OS, so I need the keyboard to work before the OS is installed.

      All recent (i.e. with built-in USB) motherboards do have BIOS USB keyboard support. All USB keyboard support the HID keyboard specification which is (relatively) easy to hardcode into BIOS.

      However, if you add a USB card to a motherboard without built-in USB ports, you're probably SOL.

    32. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I have a VIA onbord chipset, and yes, it sucks. I've actually put my old AWE 64 back into my computer rather than listen to the computer version of Rice Krispies.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    33. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea that, plus it is useless to plus into my KVM switch. Can't use it... Useless board for my setup..

    34. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, dude! Step into a new era of computing by throwing away that keyboard and replacing it with a new one with mushier keys and a different connector! I can't wait 'til the games take advantage of this exciting technological breakthrough!

    35. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by tswinzig · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sorry Abit, you lost my business right there.

      Gee, I hope they can survive.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    36. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      You realize they make other motherboards with PS/2 slots, right? Just because they have a non-legacy motherboard doesn't mean you have to buy it, or that they're phasing out all other boards. They're not stupid, just cutting-edge.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    37. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 3, Redundant

      I hate integrated components. If they die, or if something faster/cooler/better comes out that doesn't leave me enough slots to upgrade...

      Let's say you put in an Audigy in place of on-board sound.

      And a PCI gigabit Ethernet NIC instead of the on-board 10/100.

      And a GeForce4 in the AGP 4x slot.

      You still have 10 USB ports, two firewire ports, 6 IDE headers (for 12 devices). You can put anything you want in that final PCI slot. Unless you're building a server or a videa-editing center with multiple PCI cards, you're going to be hard pressed to find a way to obsolete this board in the next 48 months.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    38. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Windows 2000/XP/ME only. Win98 users need not apply.... onboard sound...

      OK, forget about this board. It smells of planned obsolescence. The extra IDE slots are the bait. Almost everything else is a hook. What if I want to install DOS on this board. OK, probably not, but just knowing that I can is nice. Wintel boxes are nice because they are backwards compatable and give you a choice of what cards to use. If I wanted onboard everything and was never going to swap out or uprade, I'd get an iMac. Then of course there is the question that every /.er *must* ask: Did MS have a hand in making this not work with earlier versions of Windows?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    39. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by marko123 · · Score: 1

      Does mfr mean "muthaf*ka?" That would be cool.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    40. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by DuranDuran · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Sorry Abit, you lost my business right there.

      ...and in other news today, Abit has said that they will cancel production of their new MAX motherboard line due to the comments of one "Sheetsda" on slashdot.org.

      "We were hoping we could please everyone with this move", said an Abit spokesman, "but it turns out we really read the market totally wrong. Sheetsda's comment, however offhand, has really shaken us".

      Abit are said to be in talks with Sheetsda to work out what he wants.

      DD

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
    41. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 2

      Let's see...

      MPEG-2 decoder/encoder, 1 slot
      Video I/O, 1 slot
      Video I/O, 1 slot
      Video I/O, 1 slotAudigy, 1 slot

      Hmm.. yep, amateur videa editing does it. And just imagine what it takes for high-end... But then, all high-end video editing is done with Linux on alphas, or IRIX on mips.

    42. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is that this is really expensive. Why do you need integrated systems if you're upgrading your computer. Just move the ISDN, ethernet, soundcard, memory, harddrives and peripherals to your newbought computer. That is the cost-effective solution. Not buying an expensive motherboard which doesn't let you do this. This may be great for newbies with lots of cash and no regard of the hardware they run. They want it easy, but for geeks, this is just flashy gadget with no real use.

    43. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      doesn't the geforce 4 have on-board MPEG-2 decoder/encoder? this mobo has 2 firewire ports, plus it has a second, unused 1394 bus on the mobo. that's 4 video/data I/O, and daisy-chainable up to 126 devices total (63 devices * 2 busses). add a 10/100/1000 card and you STILL have a slot open for that RS-232 card.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    44. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by kneeo · · Score: 1

      what's wrong with ps/2?

      I know its old, so? Is that where your bottleneck is? Are the sectary's of the world saying "damn ps/2 keyboard! I could crank out more papers if I had usb"

      If it's money thing, I can understand. It maybe cheaper put usb on the mobo, than to put usb AND ps/2..ok :)

    45. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dummy moderator, -1 Redundant is for people who are posting stuff that has already been posted by others, or who have not read the article and are being morons.

      -1 Overrated was looking for, you buffoon. I hope your karma takes a hit in meta-moderation.

      (SIGH) Back to 49 I guess... (End whine)

    46. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      man ssh

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    47. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      You're not getting this motherboard for your 486 firewall either, I hope.

      I think what he was saying is that his 486 has no USB ports, and this new board has no PS/2 ports, and so he can't operate both with his present KVM switch.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    48. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by elmegil · · Score: 1

      If my environment were all unix, that'd be wonderful. It's not. Don't care to bother finding a way to run ssh on my windows game box. Thank you for playing.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    49. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by elmegil · · Score: 1

      That's exactly my point. What moron at ABit decided that PS/2 was dead? 'Cos that's what they say, effectively, in the page about this MB.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    50. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Arandir · · Score: 1

      So I can use the keyboard without configuring USB in the OS?

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    51. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      They don't work for keyboards, unfortunately, or at least the one that came with my logitech mouse doesn't. I assume they're a commodity item.

    52. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Giving up PS/2 as "legacy" is pretty much insane. There is no reasonably priced KVM switch that does BOTH USB and PS/2, and I'm not getting USB for my 486 firewall any time soon.

      IBM model M keyboards also tend to not work too well when plugged into USB ports (read: they don't work at all). Most of the newer keyboards feel like they have mush under the keys.

      (There might well be USB-to-PS/2 converters available...but that would seem to be a kludge. Ditto for USB-to-serial and USB-to-parallel...is it really that big a deal to keep the two PS/2 ports, two serial ports, and one parallel port that belong on every computer?)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    53. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Macs seem to work fine without "lagacy" ports... no floppy drive even.

      That only happend because Steve Jobs cranked up his Reality Distortion Field® to full power. I understand that more than a few people grumbled about losing their ADB and SCSI ports.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    54. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ameoba · · Score: 2

      ...and there never will be cheap USB KVMs until there's enough hardware out there requiring USB KVMs to create a market for them.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    55. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      Well, you weren't asking, but puTTY is a freakin' great SSH client for windows. It's small, light, and generally great.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    56. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by plastik55 · · Score: 1

      Erm. "Hub" ain't "Port." Ports get full bandwidth. Hubs split it.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  7. Makes you wonder by abdulla · · Score: 1

    What will the usefulness of 12 IDE ports be? Anyone who needs that much hard drives will be using SCSI, and its not Serial ATA, could anyone explain why this is useful to me?

    1. Re:Makes you wonder by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What will the usefulness of 12 IDE ports be? Anyone who needs that much hard drives will be using SCSI

      I'd love it. Every time I buy more hard drive space, I have to toss another drive from my box (dvd-rom + cdrw + 2 hd's). I'm working on a nice little pile, currently 10 and 20gb drives at the top. That kind of space is nothing to sniff at. It'd be nice to just pop them in, it's the space I want, not the marginal increase in access time or transfer rate.

      SCSI costs more, always has, always will. I shouldn't need to spend the extra $hundreds just to be able to use a few drives at once, hence the need for boards like this. Of course, the mobo probably costs a small fortune, but if a LOT were like this, then my point would make more sense :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:Makes you wonder by TheMatt · · Score: 2

      My guess is 4 channels are RAID. So you could have 8 drives in a RAID setup. The other two channels are normal IDE for CD/DVD drives, Zip, etc. If you look at the pics, it looks like 4 RAID ports and 2 normal IDE ports.

      --

      Fortran programmer...oh yeah. Array math for life!

    3. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do biological systems modeling. I've got about 500 GB of disk space on my work computer (8 x 60 GB and 1 x 15 GB). I can generate maybe 1 MB of data per second. I can process at most 10 MB of data per second. I don't need ATA-66 much less SCSI. Using IDE saved several thousand dollars that went to more important things (like more CPUs to do the processing with).

    4. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Price. 4 raid-0'd IDE drives will beat or equal a top-speed SCSI drive for a MUCH lower price. As capacities go up, so does the disparity. $2000 for 120 GB anyone? No? Nobody wants to pay that for their Counter-Strike box? No one? OK, how about 4 30 GB drives at the same speed for $250?

    5. Re:Makes you wonder by shyster · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What will the usefulness of 12 IDE ports be? Anyone who needs that much hard drives will be using SCSI, and its not Serial ATA, could anyone explain why this is useful to me?

      According to the cut and paste job above ( Most importantly, IDE RAID...which rocks. With IDE drives, RAID lives up to it's name: Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks. True, no hot swap, and they're not as fast as SCSI, but for a consumer board (and even non-mission-critical low-end servers), IDE-RAID is the way to go.

      Then, there's the advantage of not having to put an older ATA/66 drive on the same channel as an ATA/133 drive. Or, to be able to split up your CD-ROM drive and your CD-RW to make disc to disc copying faster and more reliable. Or, put your swap drive on a different channel (and RAID it!) to give it more bandwidth.

      I can think of many more uses for 5 IDE channels (assuming 2 ports to a channel) than I can for 6 USB ports (wouldn't a USB hub be just as effective), or for 2 Firewire ports (let's see...DV camera, and...uh...)

    6. Re:Makes you wonder by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What about the money you throw away everytime you have to lose a hard drive?

      "marginal increase in access time or transfer rate. "
      the difference between the newest IDE and the newest SCSI is far more then marginal. And God help you if you want to access more then 2 devices at a time.

      If you don't believe me, go ahead and compare a 3.9 ms SCSI drive to a 3.9ms IDE drive..oh wait, they don't exist.

      As someone who has written low levely IDE and SCSI code, I can assure there are many benifits with SCSI then the access time.
      The cosr isn't that much higher, and if there were a lot of mobos manufactured with SCSI, there would be no price difference.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just buy an extra ATA controller then, and keep your 'old' drives?

    8. Re:Makes you wonder by SHiFTY1000 · · Score: 1

      It has IDE RAID onboard, thats why. IDE RAID is pretty damn useful, with todays fast IDE drives, it can nearly match scsi speed-wise (RAID 0). However there is no redundancy (the R in RAID) It can also be used for drive mirroring(RAID 1). For example, if you are building a ghetto server or have a lot of very important data on your machine. I think this is a great idea; however scsi still rocks the house (if you can afford it)

    9. Re:Makes you wonder by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Extra hundreds? Where are you buying your computer parts? I just bought a brand new, shrink wrapped Ultra Wide SCSI adapter for $25. It supports 15 SCSI devices, any number of which can be internal or external. And it only uses one IRQ.

    10. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you look at the pics, it looks like 4 RAID ports and 2 normal IDE ports.

      No, you dolt, pictures cannot tell you whether an IDE port is RAID or not. You tell these things not by looking at the board and divining its configuration, but by looking at the specs.

    11. Re:Makes you wonder by r00tdenied · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, I think he was referring to the price of the disks themselves. a 40 GB SCSI hard disk is at about $400, but the same size IDE drive is only $80. So what if the adapters are cheap? Its the drives that are expensive.

      --
      Platinum Networks Hosting www.platinum-networks.com
    12. Re:Makes you wonder by geekoid · · Score: 2

      RAID SCSI doesn't rock? Why does a consumer even need raid? if you are serious enough about HD speed to learn RAID, then you should be going SCSI. really, this is just an expensice way to try to get the advantages of SCSI.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Makes you wonder by majorero · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually with certain drive kits, IDE can be made to be hot swappable. Do a google search of hot swap and ide and check it out.

    14. Re:Makes you wonder by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Here here.

      Most geeks will argue that SCSI gives you much greater access time, and you're wasting all the irqs with ide.

      True, and true.

      But does it matter...? Seriously. This is a motherboard targeted for home use. Power home use, but still, home desktop use. It's not going to do database lookups, or web services. It's going to probably play games (load data once per map) or download mp3's (prolly via dsl/cable @~300kps).

      Space matters, cost matters, ease of use matters. IDE trounces SCSI in the later 2 (sorry, picking between incompatable SCSI versions is not ease of use) (pricewatch: ide 75gb $138 scsi 73.5 gb $443)

      Save SCSI for the NOC.

    15. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article doesn't say "12 IDE ports".

      The article says 12 IDE devices. That is six channels, two devices per channel.

      What is wrong with you people? Can't you read?

    16. Re:Makes you wonder by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Bitch, bitch, bitch...

      He's not running a datacenter. He's probably just storing stuff on his home PC.

      SCSI vs. IDE, the SCSI always has and always will cost more than IDE when comparing capacities.

      Is SCSI faster? Hell yes, I've done U160 RAID installations and it kicks ass over IDE. But for 36GB of (blindingly fast) space, it cost $1300 (500$/drive and $300 card).

      So yeah, if SCSI were more common it would cost less. But it isn't, so it does.

    17. Re:Makes you wonder by SandSpider · · Score: 1
      or for 2 Firewire ports (let's see...DV camera, and...uh...)

      ...an external Firewire hard drive, which may or may not be an iPod.


      =Brian

      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    18. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As per usual, geekoid, you're completely detached from reality.

    19. Re:Makes you wonder by freakinPsycho · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, there's not much difference in price.. really..

      Check out pricewatch, here's a sample:

      ~40 gig
      Scsi: $124
      IDE: $54

      ~80 gig
      scsi: $443
      IDE: $90

      160 gig IDE: $197
      $180 gig SCSI: $999

      Nope, not much price difference there.

      I want a lot of storage space, so I bought a mobo with onboard raid. This is not so that I can quickly access a large amount of information, but so that I have somewhere to store all kinds of crap (MP3's, etc).

      I also use the extra IDE slots so that I can have more stuff in there (DVD rom, cd-jutebox, CD-RW, windows drive, BSD drive, etc).

      I'm not going for speed, I'm going for bulk. So yeah, I could upgrade to SCSI. I'd spend a crap-load of money and not really gain anything, since I don't do anything that is IO heavy. Everything I do is CPU/Memory heavy. SCSI doesn't help me there.

      SCSI has its place, but I don't need it. I'm happy with my ability to stick a bunch of IDE drives into my computer and play with it like that. I have a board with 4 IDE channels, 2 1/2 of which I use. I don't need SCSI.

      --
      "All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening."
      - Alexandar Woolcot
    20. Re:Makes you wonder by virtual_mps · · Score: 1

      Um, have you noticed how expensive tape backup units are? The only practical way for people to protect themselves from drive failure is to raid. It's not speed, it's redundancy. I've raided my home system ever since a (scsi) drive failure took out a (luckily unimportant) partition. I've also gone ide because the scsi upgrades were just too expensive.

    21. Re:Makes you wonder by Akumapwr · · Score: 1

      The fastest drive is a Seagate 18gb 15k RPM 3.7MS drive. Currently less than $200 on pricewatch.com

      A controller can be had on ebay for less than $60 (2940uw2) 80mb/sec.

      So that's $260 for an 18gb drive that blows away ever IDE hard drive in existence and for a long while. Yeah, my 160gb IDE can go UP to 45mb/sec but as anyone knows, data rate is only have as important as ACCESS TIME.

      With WinXP/Linux/whatever installed with a ton of games, you still would NOT fill an 18gb drive.

      What about all those Mp3s? Movies? Archived stuff? That's what IDE is for get a nice slow 80gb drive for less than $100.

      Don't fool yourself there is nothing close to SCSI. I have studied this area for MANY years a single scsi drive will destroy an IDE drive anyday just because of the access time.

      Whatever crack these review sites are on, I don't know. It must be some good stuff, because when I install an OS any these drives the scsi drive BLOWS away the IDE. Q3 loads in less than 2sec's. I've tried tons of different machines, not to mention SCSI drives come with a 5 year warranty... Wonder why?

    22. Re:Makes you wonder by threephaseboy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, FW CD-RW's, using another computer in FW disk mode.. oh wait I forgot this isnt a mac.

      --
      .
    23. Re:Makes you wonder by metatruk · · Score: 1
      With IDE drives, RAID lives up to it's name: Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks.

      Actually, RAID is "redundant array of independent disks."
      It used to be "redundant array of inexpensive disks" back in 1988 when the acronym first appeared. Since then, the RAID Advisory Board has since substituted "Independent" for "Inexpensive".
    24. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have the seagate 15k drive why would you pair it with an LVD controller? Why not pair it with a 160 controller? That will raise the price. Everything is price/performance ratio.

      I do agree though, that SCSI does blow IDE away, but for my home machine, I'll take IDE's performance based on it's price over SCSI. For the datacenter, no way in hell.

    25. Re:Makes you wonder by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the difference between the newest IDE and the newest SCSI is far more then marginal.

      That's right,- at least if you are talking about the price tag.

      188 GB SCSI: $999,-
      160 GB IDE: 197,-

      And God help you if you want to access more then 2 devices at a time.

      Exactly why it is nice to have a board with more than 2 IDE controllers. As long as you hook all devices to their own controller, there's no problem accessing more than 2 devices, which you should know, I know as someone who just finished writing a UltraDMA driver for a custom OS.

      If you don't believe me, go ahead and compare a 3.9 ms SCSI drive to a 3.9ms IDE drive..oh wait, they don't exist.

      And this is where a RAID controller kicks in.

      So take your SCSI elitism and buy your drive for 5 times what it should cost. All the best.

    26. Re:Makes you wonder by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      "With WinXP/Linux/whatever installed with a ton of games, you still would NOT fill an 18gb drive."

      Bullshit. I know someone (worked on his computer) that filled a 40 GB drive with just Win98 and games. Yeah, he has a ton of games, but he still filled it up.

      Access time, transfer rate, number of drives per channel, yeah, SCSI blows IDE away completely. Cost per GB, no f'ing way. You said it yourself, $260 for 18 GB SCSI. $100 for 80 GB IDE. And how fast of access do you need? My 7200 RPM Maxtor seems to access files quite fast thank you. It may not be 3.7 ms, but I don't need that either. I'm running a gaming machine, not a datacenter. Hell, even with the photo editing and video conversions I do, SCSI wouldn't do shit for me. I need space and CPU power, both of which I have, not access time.

    27. Re:Makes you wonder by lost_it · · Score: 1
      The cosr[sic] isn't that much higher [for SCSI over IDE]

      Please tell me where you shop. I have a SCSI adapter in my computer (it came with the last prebuilt desktop that I bought), and I know SCSI is better, and I wanted more space, so I priced SCSI drives. I checked outpost.com, and here are the prices that I found:

      The most expensive IDE hard drive: Caviar 100GB EIDE Ultra/ATA100 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive - Retail

      Similarly priced SCSI drives don't get above 18GB (check here)

      I realize that outpost.com probably doesn't have the cheapest prices. But wherever you find cheaper SCSI drives, you'll find cheaper IDE drives. If you can prove me wrong, please reply; I'd love to have more SCSI drives.

    28. Re:Makes you wonder by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Should have spent an extra $20, and got a fibrer channel adapter on ebay.

      It supports 127 devices without getting fancy, and 65,000 or so, if you have the cash for decent FC hubs or switches.

      $1 per gig, for smaller drives. Some hubs are under $300 on ebay. 200mps of bandwidth. You can use STP cat5.

      I am to you, what you are to these weenies getting hardons over IDE... I am Ubergeek.

    29. Re:Makes you wonder by shyster · · Score: 2
      RAID SCSI doesn't rock? Why does a consumer even need raid?

      Of course RAID SCSI rocks! The price is outrageous for the performance, however. And consumers don't need the added reliability of a SCSI drive, or hot swap, RAID 5, etc. But, since the HDD is still the slowest part of a modern system, it only makes sense to increase the performance of it.

      if you are serious enough about HD speed to learn RAID, then you should be going SCSI.

      Learn RAID? What's there to learn? We're not talking rocket science or programming here....Increases speed, can increase reliability, does away with different drive letters for smallish drives...what's not to love?

      really, this is just an expensice way to try to get the advantages of SCSI.

      No, SCSI is just an expensive way to get the advantages of IDE-RAID. SCSI RAID is an extremely expensive way to blow some serious cash. In a consumer environment, at least. SCSI in midrange servers is, IMO, a requirement.

    30. Re:Makes you wonder by shyster · · Score: 2
      Um, have you noticed how expensive tape backup units are? The only practical way for people to protect themselves from drive failure is to raid. It's not speed, it's redundancy. I've raided my home system ever since a (scsi) drive failure took out a (luckily unimportant) partition. I've also gone ide because the scsi upgrades were just too expensive.

      Good point. TBU's are pretty outrageous, especially when you start looking at backing up today's monstrous hard drives to a single tape (or autoloader). IDE tape drives are more reasonably priced, though. I can't say I'd recommend them though. They're a good bit slower and more prone to failure than SCSI units, in my experience.

      Lucky for me, I get to keep old TBU's from customers. :) I use 1 DDS-2 (10/20GB) and 1 DDS-3 (12/24GB) SCSI TBU's to back myself up, so I can use RAID for performance and still not worry too much.

    31. Re:Makes you wonder by archen · · Score: 1

      Actually at work I dragged out a bunch of old computer hardware (literally covered in a layer of dirt/dust) and came out with two somewhat dated SCSI drives, and an ancient SCSI adapter. It still sort of floors me how the two drives manage to outperform my 7200rpm IDE that I had been using in the computer previously. All in all, I think I'd rather buy SCSI because there a lot more quality control. IDE drives seem to be spit out in mass quantities and die in droves. In contrast I've never actually seen a SCSI drive die (ever). I'm sure it happens, and some people have their stories, but I'd just rather invest a bit more money on something I have confidence in.

    32. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure filled my 15gb pretty quick, but not as quick as the 4gb scsi i got at the same time for twice the price. I had to slap a reconditioned FULL HEIGHT 5 1/4" 9gb scsi drive in there. It sounds like it has a diesel engine in it. It was comperable in price to a NEW ide drive. IDE is for consumers, SCSI is for servers, and apparently people with too much money to give to vendors.

    33. Re:Makes you wonder by Octorian · · Score: 1

      I've had SCSI drives die, but only crappy ones.
      One that failed was an old Compaq rebranded Seagate 4GB, and the others were IBM "DHFS" model 1GB-2GB drives. But then again, these are old and crappy models.

      All my other SCSI drives work just fine and dandy :) Heck, that even includes this one model of SCSI drive that's over 10 years old (it's 3.5" half-height, and comes from 400MB-2GB) and made by IBM. If those things survive the first decade, they're gonna survive the next one :)

      I have stopped trusting cheap IDE disks when I care, though... When you run as much equipment personally as I do, you notice things. Just yesterday, the 1.5 year old IBM IDE system disk in my file server started failing. Well, it's getting replaced by a nice 10krpm 18.2GB SCSI disk next week :) (thank goodness I use RAID for my important data)

    34. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 160 IS a LVD

    35. Re:Makes you wonder by freeweed · · Score: 2

      as posted in a reply below:

      pricewatch: ide 75gb $138 scsi 73.5 gb $443

      nuff said in my books.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    36. Re:Makes you wonder by Chas · · Score: 1

      What about the money you throw away everytime you have to lose a hard drive?

      Are you saying nobody EVER loses a SCSI drive?

      Additionally, WHAT "lose a hard drive"?

      I have disks in some of my systems that are 7-8 years old. No bad sectors. No physical problems. Nada.

      the difference between the newest IDE and the newest SCSI is far more then marginal. And God elp you if you want to access more than 2 devices at a time.

      Hence things like IDE RAID. Not to mention IDE drives with larger caches.

      compare a 3.9 ms SCSI drive to a 3.9ms IDE drive

      Tell me you're really and truly going to miss 5 thousandths of a second. Especially on a drive with an 8MB cache.

      And exactly how many $200 120GB SCSI drives can you find?

      Sure, you can get 10K and 15K SCSI disks. But 15K drives pretty much top out at 36GB right now and 10K drives top out at 73GB. Not to mention they that the 15K 36GB and 10K 72GB start around $450.

      Anything larger (181.6GB drives are "speeding" along at 5400rpm and cost about $1000 a pop.

      Or are you going to tell me the cache of the SCSI disks is faster than the cache of the IDE disks?

      The cosr isn't that much higher, and if there were a lot of mobos manufactured with SCSI, there would be no price difference.

      For a decent SCSI adapter onboard? I kinda doubt that the cost difference wouldn't be significant, even with ubiquitous production. And the REAL cost difference isn't the controller itself. It's the DRIVES. Look at the prices

      While I acknowledge that SCSI IS the superior format here, I think you should at least acknowledge that IDE isn't nearly as bad as you're making it out to be.

      For most of the uses that this board will be put to, IDE is more than adequate.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    37. Re:Makes you wonder by abdulla · · Score: 1

      Well I guess I was always one of those few who tended to buy there time before buying another hard disk. I only recently bought a 60 GB, and i feel I won't buy another until Serial ATA is among us and strong.

    38. Re:Makes you wonder by cb0y · · Score: 0

      thats not the issue, you can buy scsi cards cheaply $50.

      THe problem is you wont find 120gig scsi drives for $170.

      http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduct.asp?submit =m anufactory&catalog=14&manufactory=1306&DEPA=1

      36GIG SCSI = $299

      No thankx

      Btw,

      Recording industry collects $1 million fine

      That's the message the recording industry hoped to send on Tuesday by announcing it had collected $1 million from a company that let employees swap songs on an internal server.

      http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/News/Details.asp ?R elatedID=2213

    39. Re:Makes you wonder by saintlupus · · Score: 2

      Actually, RAID is "redundant array of independent disks."

      Not to be confused with RASDA, the Randomly Accessed Shitty Drive Array. This term was coined a couple years ago by myself and some friends when we realized we all had three or four relatively low capacity drives in our systems because we were all too poor to buy new hardware.

      --saint

    40. Re:Makes you wonder by dylantech · · Score: 1

      If you get banished are you going to refuse and just kill yourself instead?

      --
      Now back to your regularly scheduled rant already in progress...
    41. Re:Makes you wonder by CrackerJackz · · Score: 1

      Raid 0, 1 or 5??? I have not found the manual for this board yet, but very few mobo's out there support ide raid level 5, and if you are touting the value of raid 0 for backups ... you going to be in for some fun :) since raid 0 exponentially increases your change of data loss due to drive failure ... raid 5 is the *only* way to go, if your truly paranoid (of have over 25 disks in a volume set) you can tack on an online spare drive as well...

    42. Re:Makes you wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a 2940U2W isn't an Ultra160 controller, and will not drive the Cheetah at its maximum speed.

    43. Re:Makes you wonder by virtual_mps · · Score: 1

      What on earth gives you that idea? raid 5 is no more reliable than raid 1 (which is usually supported by hardware raid units) and can actually be less so if you're paranoid and have more than two copies of the data in a raid 1 array. raid 1 can also be faster if you combine it with raid 0 with mirrored stripes or striped mirrors. The only downsides are that raid 1 can be somewhat slower than raid 5 for certain operations (though faster for others) and that it costs a bit more in disk space. FYI, many of the really large arrays (e.g., multiterrabyte arrays from emc or hitachi) prefer raid 1 to avoid the parity generation overhead, increase resync rate, and provide better degraded performance.

  8. Stability by Beliskner · · Score: 1
    Great, but is it stable? Everyone seems to go by "popular reputation".

    Well Pop quiz hotshot, if I'm the only geek in this area (ie. I don't live in California), where do I find out which board has a good reputation?

    --
    A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    1. Re:Stability by Fomhoire · · Score: 1

      Not if it is anything like my last three Abit boards.

    2. Re:Stability by mr_gerbik · · Score: 2

      What?? My KT7 is stable as a mofo'. Overclocks like a charm too. Never had a problem with it. (knock on wood)

    3. Re:Stability by Fomhoire · · Score: 1

      Don't knock too hard. I got the new and improved version of that, the KT7A, and I have had nothing but problems. I finally fixed it by replacing it with an Epox.

    4. Re:Stability by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      I've had some problems with an Intel board refusing to power down, even ignoring da big power switch (makes me think you will be assimilated). Anyway, RMA'd it but still didn't work. I'm thinking maybe the HD controller or GFX card is giving interference on the power rails or something. Weird.

      According to popular opinion I am a freak 'cos Intel boards are the most reliable on market... ?-)

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    5. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KT7 is the worst motherboard I've ever owned.

      It's a known buggy motherboard.

      I bought because of the integrated RAID controller, only problem is that it disconnects the USB hub, if you have something connected to the second channel. What a POS

    6. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Historically, Abit's boards have features up the wazoo but aren't the most stable mobo's available. The AT7 definitely meets the first point. I hope that they have gotten past the second.

    7. Re:Stability by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      By the Big Power Switch do you mean the one on your case or the one on your Power Supply?

      Only because, I don't care how Borg it is, there's no way it should be able to stay on when you turn the power supply off.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    8. Re:Stability by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 2

      indeed.

      I've sworn off Abit boards for the moment. but I'll give them credit where it's due, they REALLY do know how to lay out a board sensibly.

      If only they could build them properly too. :/

    9. Re:Stability by shepd · · Score: 1

      I suppose you don't own any of these then:

      - Diamond Stealth II G460
      - Leadtek WinFast TH
      - Aureal card (the motherboard is PHYSICALLY INCOMPATIBLE with this entire line of chips because the designer didn't bother to test them at all. So pathetic it's not even funny!)
      - GeForce 2 GTS or MX
      - ATI Radeon DDR
      - Voodoo 2
      - ATI 3D Rage 128
      - Matrox G400 or G200
      - Diamond Viper 770
      - Hercules 3D Prophet II PRO
      - Asus V7700 AGP
      - ATI 64 DDR
      - Voodoo 4500
      - Asus V3400
      - Matrox G450
      - Hercules Prophet 4500
      - GeForce 3 ti200
      - 1.4GHz Thunderbird (My favourite chip to stress test crappy mobos with)
      - Soundblaster Live
      - Soundblaster AWE32 ISA
      - Yamaha DS2416
      - Soundblaster AWE 64
      - Diamond M80
      - Terratec XFire 1024
      - Soundblaster PCI128/PCI64
      - Sonic Impact S90
      - Sonic Fury
      - Hercules GTXP
      - Gamesurround Fortissimo II
      - CMI8738-based soundcard
      - Soundblaster Audigy

      (granted, a lot of it is driver problems because a pile of driver versions are NOT compatible with this mobo, but physical incompatibilities are simply unacceptable)

      It's all here: FAQ

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:Stability by Beliskner · · Score: 1

      The one on the case. That's more firmware controlled I think or something like that.

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    11. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm... few problems there. Here's the list of cards (edited from yours) I've personally used and had no problems with on my KT7-RAID:

      - GeForce 2 GTS or MX
      - ATI 3D Rage 128
      - Diamond Viper 770
      - Soundblaster Live
      - Soundblaster AWE32 ISA
      - Soundblaster AWE 64
      - Soundblaster PCI128/PCI64
      - CMI8738-based soundcard

      Oh, and the absolutely flaky MiroVideo DC20 (not the normal DC10/30, the 20 is a strange one) MJPEG video-IO board will ONLY work on my KT7 with Win2k/XP... the other MSI K7TPro2-A I have chokes and dies when I feed it that card.

    12. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of those are only broken on the KT7A when you use certain drivers (as I mentioned).

      It's likely you're using newer drivers that have been redesigned to avoid the multitude of problems this motherboard causes.

  9. Re:Completely useless by linzeal · · Score: 1
    Um, pci cards are pretty cheap as well. I mean vid card for 5 dollars or 5 dollars, sound card for 5 dollars or 5 dollars...

    Most places won't stock cards under 5 bucks.

  10. IEE 1394 baby! by red5 · · Score: 1

    I't also has two IEE 1394(firewire|ilink) ports.
    This is very good. As there are 400mb a sec.
    Much faster then USB. 1394 is also point to point so logically you could have a DVcam plug directly into your 1394 Harddrive drive.
    Looks like I don't need a mac after all :)

    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
    1. Re:IEE 1394 baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Join The (Hopefully)Great Slashdot Blackout [slashdot.org] Apr 21-27

      If you don't click past the homepage, how will you know if it's working? I bet you look..

    2. Re:IEE 1394 baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the number of comments posted perhaps?

    3. Re:IEE 1394 baby! by PhuCknuT · · Score: 2, Informative

      It also has 2 usb2.0 ports, which are 480 mbps, faster than firewire.

    4. Re:IEE 1394 baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably missed the part about USB 2.0, which does 480 Mbps. You'll still probably find most camcorders still using firewire though.

    5. Re:IEE 1394 baby! by telstar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I still bet he looks...

    6. Re:IEE 1394 baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It claims to be faster, but it doesn't pan out that way in real world usage. Besides, Firewire is established while USB 2 is just superfluous.

    7. Re:IEE 1394 baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially since Microsoft is repugnant, and Linux is still trying to be OS X. Does Linux even recognise Firewire yet, and are there apps to use it?

  11. You too, idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6 are built in to the case, there are connectors for 4 more.

    1. Re:You too, idiot. by shyster · · Score: 1
      6 are built in to the case, there are connectors for 4 more.

      You're right. My bad. 6 + 4 equals...oh wait, it does equal 10! I guess I was right all along!

      BTW, they're just selling the motherboard, not the case.

    2. Re:You too, idiot. by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      BTW, they're just selling the motherboard, not the case.
      +1 - Zing!

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    3. Re:You too, idiot. by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      See what I mean? They really do need to make that a valid mod...

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
  12. Innovation? by Da+Penguin · · Score: 1
    >Abit's MAX series intends to dive headfirst into the next generation of computing, leaving legacy ports behind in their dust

    Hey that is pretty innovative, you usually don't see motherboards doing dives (although video cards have been known to take dives pretty often). Although I guess that this should have been expected with all the news about CPU water coolers and Underwater power generation.

  13. The abit website by young-earth · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those who are unaware, the Abit website is NOT www.abit.com; that reroutes you to motherboards.com. The site you want is www.abit-usa.com or www.abit.com.twinstead.

    1. Re:The abit website by staili · · Score: 1

      And once again we notice that domains don't work and we all should use search engines.

    2. Re:The abit website by Comen · · Score: 1

      The problem with thier website is why I will NEVER by another ABIT motherbord ever!
      I cant stand any tech company that dont maintain thier own website.
      Its slow, there is a USA site, I think www.abit-usa.com maybe? But I couldnt get any bios udates from either site, and its dont look like they keep up with it at all.
      I judge alot of hardware by the support I get and hardware updates I can download.

  14. Re:Completely useless by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    Wealthiest? Geekiest? While perhaps geeky, I currently have a USB printer, USB mouse, USB keyboard, USB joystick, USB webcam (for conferencing), USB steering wheel (F1 2000 CS is fantastic)...hrmm, that's all I can think of right now. I use a hub to be able to connect all of these, and I actually haven't bought anything new in about a year : This is all pretty old stuff.

  15. Re:Completely useless by NineNine · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I've got plenty of working ISA cards. TRUE geeks don't buy new hardware just because it's new. TRUE geeks keep working shit working. People who buy the latest and greatest the second it comes out are called wannabe's.

  16. New Abit motherboard, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it accept a SoundBlaster sound card without locking up at startup when the SB16 Emulation driver is loaded?

    1. Re:New Abit motherboard, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nevermind, page finally loaded. Comes with the same sound built-in that it took me a year to figure out how to get working on their KT7A-RAID board. Go ahead and mod down the previous to oblivion.

  17. ....more pics can be found here... by NYCEE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    check out this site for some pretty pictures of abits new board http://www.ocworkbench.com/2002/abit/at7/at7previe w1.htm

    1. Re:....more pics can be found here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me lazy, but I hate it when people spit out links without the HTML formatting. You expect me to go through the trouble of copying/pasting http://www.ocworkbench.com/2002/abit/at7/at7previe w1.htm into my location bar? Pfft.

      On a more serious note, though, at the rate that companies have been spewing out USB devices, I'm surprised that a mobo manufacturer hasn't taken the hint to give us more USB ports before this point in time. I've been resorting to just switching in/out USB devices all the time just to function (yes, this means that I am too lazy to use a USB hub, yet I'll swap mobo's without thinking about it).

      -Sou|cuttr

    2. Re:....more pics can be found here... by NYCEE · · Score: 1

      i got you the link, you do the copy and pasting. shit i got lazy too. why do you think i excluded the html formatting?

  18. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck are you talking about? ISA cards? Bleeding edge? You are comparing two extremes there - I bet you still have an AST RAMpage, don't you....

    This mainboard is virtually useless only if you're tighter than a fish's asshole.

  19. Wow 12 IDE's by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 2, Funny

    12 * 160 GB = is almost 2 TB!!!

    And the sound of a 747 taking of comes @ no extra charge!

    1. Re:Wow 12 IDE's by AstroJetson · · Score: 2

      And the sound of a 747 taking of comes @ no extra charge!

      Yup, and with an Athlon and a GeForce in there too, it can double as a weenie roaster.

      --
      Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
    2. Re:Wow 12 IDE's by red_dragon · · Score: 3, Funny
      Yup, and with an Athlon and a GeForce in there too, it can double as a weenie roaster.

      It's the perfect flight simulator box! Not only are the engine sounds simulated, but the engine exhaust heat is simulated too!

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    3. Re:Wow 12 IDE's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never used a barcuda ATA IV drive from seagate. Those things are dead quite.

    4. Re:Wow 12 IDE's by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but those don't exist in 160GB versions :(

    5. Re:Wow 12 IDE's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few calculations...

      Maxtor: 12*160GB = 1920GB = 1.875TB. $3,108
      Maxtor: 12*120GB = 1440GB = 1.406TB. $2,148
      IBM: 12*120GB = 1440GB = 1.406TB. $2,508
      Seagate: 12*80GB = 960GB = 0.937TB. $1,548
      Seagate: 12*60GB = 720GB = 0.703TB. $1,308
      Seagate: 12*40GB = 480GB = 1/2TB. $1,020
      Western Digital: 12*100 = 1200GB = 1.171TB. $2,064

      Maybe a few friends could chip in and we could buy our own terraserver. I'd definitely go for it.

    6. Re:Wow 12 IDE's by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 1

      Oh, you should look @ pricewatch,- 160GB for $197, that's $2364,- instead of $3108!!!

      Not bad! I'm building a terraserver myself to store all my DVDs(unmodified, so no loss of quality or extra stuff).

  20. I think they're smoking ABIT of crack over there.. by knownzero · · Score: 1

    How long has it been since USB came out and I STILL have problems not being able to get good driver support for it and they want to make it ALL USB? What about us Linux folks who don't use much USB because the drivers haven't been written yet? A lot of the bleeding edge people out there that they are marketing this to are using Linux, so they've effectively cut out that portion of their userbase already.

    --
    quod me nutrit me destruit
  21. Re:Completely useless by NineNine · · Score: 2, Redundant

    I don't even know what an AST Rampage is... All I know is I'm running a PII 250, and it works just fine. If you have to buy new parts because you can't make your old stuff work, sounds like you got some learning to do.

  22. Its not 12! by abdulla · · Score: 1

    Its 10: "...a 4 channel ATA/133 RAID adapter (making for an unprecedented support of 10 ATA drives onboard)..."

    1. Re:Its not 12! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Page 2 says 12.

    2. Re:Its not 12! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's twelve. There are another 2 on the Highpoint RAID controller that can be used in non-RAID mode.

    3. Re:Its not 12! by dchamp · · Score: 1

      Where do you get 10???

      Standard IDE 0 & 1 = 4 devices
      4 RAID controllers = 8 devices
      4 + 8 = 12.

      If you get to the /.'ed site, you can see the 2 standard IDE ports next to the memory slots, and the 4 IDE RAID ports at the bottom right.

      How many firewire HD's could you chain on? If you're desperate you could throw in some USB drives too. Talk about storage out the wazoo.

      This message brought to you by the number 12.

      -dc

    4. Re:Its not 12! by dsoltesz · · Score: 1
      The specs say:
      • 2 Channels of Bus Master IDE Ports supporting up to 4 Ultra DMA 33/66/100/133 devices
      • 4 Channels of Bus Master IDE Ports supporting up to 8 Ultra DMA 33/66/100/133 (RAID 0/1/1+0) devices
      That's 12 disks.

      There's also:

      • 4 USB 1.1 Connectors
      • On board VIA VT6202 USB 2.0 header for four extra USB channels
      • Three 1394a fully compliant cable ports at 100/200/400 megabits per second
  23. Re:Completely useless by /dev/trash · · Score: 1
    I don't even have a single USB device, and I still use ISA cards extensively because they'er so damn cheap.

    Just curious but where do you get ISA cards so cheaply?

  24. slots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    First off, you are only going to get 3 PCI slots. This is because most of the peripherals that would use a PCI slot, such as the Ethernet adapter and sound card, are already onboard. Personally I've never used more than 3 PCI slots, and with this board, not a single slot it used. Yep, 3 should definitely be enough.

    He should tell that to people who bitch about Apple towers only having 4 PCI slots considering Apple's had ethernet, firewire and usb built-in for years.

    1. Re:slots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention Apple includes Gigabit ethernet, non of this pansey 100base crap, on TiBooks and G4 towers anyway. Also, as a side note, Gigabit ethernet cards have been known to overload 33Mhz PCI interfaces, looks like Apple got it right integrating.

  25. ./ed by NYCEE · · Score: 1

    The site is now officially slashdoted!

    1. Re:./ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clever fellow.

    2. Re:./ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, ./ed?

      You forgot to chmod +x ed.

      Gee.

  26. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TRUE geeks have better things to do than watch their X Windows redraw. TRUE geeks like cool new stuff and it is high on their list of priorities to get it. Most people think of people who buy the latest and greatest lucky.

    People who bitch about people who get the latest and greatest and try and make a virtue out of their own poverty are called jealous.

  27. very odd... by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

    my fav MB is still the tyan thunder K7 with onboard dual scsi ultra 160. it has all the pins for more USB if you want, and the nature of USB itselfs lets you add on as you need it... there is no need to START with 10 ports.

    as for IDE, i thought they were getting rid of legacy support?!

    this seems worthless to me. in fact, i think i'll go get another thunder K7 on pricewatch just to show abit where they should be heading.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:very odd... by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      They couldn't exactly get rid of IDE just yet, especially considering that there aren't any comparable consumer-level technologies available yet. Firewire is the closest, but until drives are available with actual firewire interfaces, IDE won't stand a chance of going away.

      As well, does the Thunder K7 have support for USB 2.0? Obviously, you can add a card, but having all the ports for the latest and greatest is what this MB is about. Also, for someone like me, having that many USB ports is great. It means that I don't have to buy a USB hub or any extra parts or cards or anything. Every USB device I own, 1.1 or 2.0, will have its own spot on the motherboard, instead of the nice mixture of cards and hubs I have now. More than likely, this is the board that I'll use in my next system.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    2. Re:very odd... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      What makes scsi so expensive compared to IDE ? I am really ignorant of any significant reasons why a firewire drive, ide drive, or scsi drive would have different manuffacturing costs as the cost of the controller for each should be about the same in todays world of .15 and cheap ram.

    3. Re:very odd... by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I'm a pro sys admin. I have a usb device. Its a camera. I plug it in, download images and unplug it. It works great. What do I need 10 usb ports for again? What great usb hardware exists? I don't even like using my wireless keyboards on usb, they just work better on PS/2. And if USB 2.0 is so great why didn't Abit include 10 USB 2.0 ports? Isn't it backward compatible with USB 1.x?

    4. Re:very odd... by bonzoesc · · Score: 2

      Because people are willing to pay more for SCSI, and the manufacturers don't see a real business need to make them ass-cheap quite yet. That's a shame, because I only have money for IDE drives but I have a spare PCI slot beggin' for a SCSI controller to speed up my legal MP3 downloads of albums I already own on CD. Uh huh.

    5. Re:very odd... by T5 · · Score: 1

      I also love the Thunder K7, but it needs a couple of things. First off, that unique power supply need gripes me. They're hard to find and relatively expensive. Second, no USB 2.0 support. Third, the 64 bit PCI slots are only 33 MHz. The Tiger MPX, OTOH, has both 66 MHz 64 bit PCI slots and comes with an USB 2.0 card (the 760MPX is broken wrt its USB 1.1 capabilities).

      The Abit WA2A should give Tyan some much-needed competition in this arena.

    6. Re:very odd... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      What great usb hardware exists?

      I have three gamepads, two joysticks, a scanner, a mouse, and two digital cameras, all USB. I think my printer can talk USB too. I've considered getting USB rudder pedals, a steering wheel, and a graphics tablet also, and a PDA that talks USB.

      There's no reason a PS/2 wireless keyboard should work any better than a USB one.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    7. Re:very odd... by HalfFlat · · Score: 2

      For reference, the Tyan Tiger MPX board used to ship with a USB 1.1 card, not a USB 2.0 card.

      On the other hard, the latest revision of the board uses an updated version of the AMD chipset which resolves the bug, and thus has working on-board USB.

    8. Re:very odd... by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      There's no reason a PS/2 wireless keyboard should work any better than a USB one.

      In fact, there's plenty of reason that the USB one would work better than the PS/2 one. Case in point, my MS Natural Pro KB. It has both PS/2 and USB connectors. If you plug it into the PS/2 port, it comes up as a standard keyboard and you must install the IntelliPoint software in order for all the extras to work. However, plug it into the USB port and Windows autodetects the type of keyboard it is and installs support for the extra features automatically (at least under XP). For someone who uses the extra features a lot, not having to go through the hassle of installing software and rebooting and such is great--enough for me to choose the USB over PS/2, anyway.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  28. How about more firewire ports! by Ryu2 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It only has 2 firewire ports, which actually many motherboardss have these days.

    Not only is it the standard for digital video and still cameras nowadays, IEEE 1394 aka Firewire/iLink is rapidly eclipsing SCSI as the standard for high-speed external storage devices like hard drives and burners.

    Also, USB 2.0 is still not supported in Windows, but Firewire is.

    USB is nice, but more Firewire ports -- that would be appealing to me!

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:How about more firewire ports! by mozkill · · Score: 1

      most USB2.0 hardware comes with their own drivers... so YES... it is supported. its just that microsoft hasnt released their own generic drivers...

      mabye their waiting to see what sorts of drivers get developed, and then they will pounce and push everyone else out of the market... i dunno...

      --

      -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
    2. Re:How about more firewire ports! by Space+Coyote · · Score: 1
      What's nice about firewire devices is that they behave much better when you chain them together than USB 1/2 devices do, as they have much more sophisticated circuitry for handling multiple data streams coming in at once, with priority settings so your video input doesn't stop when you try to write something to an external HD. Very nice indeed.

      This is why Apple was able to go from 2 FW ports on the old iBook to just 1 on the newer ones with no trouble at all.

      --
      ___
      Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    3. Re:How about more firewire ports! by Pfhor · · Score: 2

      Actually, extra firewire ports are redundant, unless of course, you mean more firewire controllers... You can have 63 devices on a controller, you can daisy chain them without major performance issues (the only case of it not being the best idea to daisy chain em that I have heard of is when you are doing software raid, each drive on its own controller gives optimum performance).

      Considering that USB2.0 is a completely different ball park, which I know nothing about. BTW before people start saying that USB2.0 will kill firewire, remember that it is probably not going to appear in a major market anytime soon: Digital Video Cameras. Sony pretty much leads the pack in this, and the high end stuff has had them for a while (actually, before apple started the whole imovie thing).

      Still astonished that I would ever hear a pc review magazine say that 3 pci slots is not enough (after hearing them lambast apple for making machines with only 3. BTW, they have 4, 64bit, 33mhz pci slots now)

    4. Re:How about more firewire ports! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What "pc review magazine" said 3 PCI slots aren't enough? The /.'ed site says 3 is plenty... especially with 5.1 sound, USB 1 & 2, firewire, and 10/100 NIC integrated.

    5. Re:How about more firewire ports! by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      So are extra USB ports. Just buy a powered USB hub and you're done. You can have something like 90 USB devices on a controller (I'm sure performance sucks, but that's the spec I think).

    6. Re:How about more firewire ports! by virtual_mps · · Score: 1

      > Not only is it the standard for digital video
      > and still cameras nowadays, IEEE 1394 aka
      > Firewire/iLink is rapidly eclipsing SCSI as
      > the standard for high-speed external storage
      > devices like hard drives and burners.

      Ha! Despite the hype, firewire is ridiculously slower than scsi. I don't know how you can believe that it's replacing scsi for high-speed storage.

    7. Re:How about more firewire ports! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not what he said. idiot!!!!

  29. Re:Completely useless by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    P-II 250? What the heck is that? Do you mean a P2 266? Or was this some bastardized version of a Pentium Pro (though a PPro isn't a P2).

    Most people buy new parts because their old parts are, by comparison, junk. I have a big box full of old crap that never actually stopped working, but I think I'd rather have a nice new video card than a Trident 9440 just because it hasn't burned out yet.

  30. smartass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually it was JUST /.ed !

  31. Wait wait wait by sielwolf · · Score: 0, Troll

    IDE slots? 12? Please tell me this is a typo... or that there are 24 PCI slots. WTF would you use 12 IDE slots for that you wouldn't want to do with something a little more *ahem* modern?

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:Wait wait wait by r00tdenied · · Score: 1

      Whats wrong with you man! He didn't say slots he said IDE devices. e.g. hard drives. I would do anything to get my hands on this, it would be excellent for a kick ass linux server.

      --
      Platinum Networks Hosting www.platinum-networks.com
    2. Re:Wait wait wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imagine the being able to write a piece of a file to each of those drives at one time. My guess is hd bandwidth will go up significantly.. instead of ata133 it will seem like ata600 or something similar

    3. Re:Wait wait wait by jrwyant · · Score: 1

      ATA won't keep going up, and even if they did play with the electrical signalling to accomplish "ATA600", we're past the point of "diminshing returns": the set up of ATA cycles still required CPU-initiated Programed I/O "PIO" cycles, the write speed is capped at around 88MB/s, and the actual read data transfers are only at the 133MB/s. So, you're speeding up only one part of an overall ATA cycle, and as you speed that part up, it's overall significance drops. Hence the cheap-drive-industry move for Serial ATA (new electricals/drives, but using legacy software IDE drivers.)

    4. Re:Wait wait wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron. You are confusing _ISA_ _SLOTS_ witt _IDE_ _CHANNELS_.

      There are a TOTAL of 6 (SIX) IDE channels on the board, supporting up to two drives each, for a total of 12 drives supported.

      As far as modern, almost every consumer (or business) workstation sold today has IDE drives - SCSI is usually used only for servers (not that some uber-geeks dont uses SCSI in their workstations, its just not common)..

    5. Re:Wait wait wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article doesn't say "12 IDE slots". That doesn't make any sense. There is no such thing as an IDE "slot".

      The article says 12 IDE devices. That is six channels, two devices per channel.

    6. Re:Wait wait wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serial ATA.

      Buy a clue.

    7. Re:Wait wait wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of backwards compatability, that reminds me, don't all "IBM PCs" have to emulate the ISA Bus' DMA controller, IRQ controller (irq 2 for the cascaded 8259? :), Keyboard Controller (irq 1), Timer (irq 0) and Real-Time-Clock (irq 8)? Also, I've noticed on Windows 2000, if you look at the bus that the stock IDE interfaces use, it shows them to be on the ISA bus.

      So even by removing the ISA bus Expansion slots and other external interfaces, the ISA bus (and it's quick and cheap design, as I think I may have seen Linus' and other's comments in the kernel code for the i386 core logic) and its stability problems will still remaine untill a new IRQ, DMA, RTC and timer "chips" are made. But that would kill DOS for sure and NT would need a new HAL (doesn't MS say that the HAL makes NT easy to port.. so should not be a problem) and Linux has been ported to, well.. enough said. :) So until that happens there will not be a "Legacy Free." Or maybe I'm wrong and IO-APIC fixes that...

  32. Not so many ports... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

    Given that it throws away all legacy ports, I'd say it's pretty short in USB ports.
    One ofr the keyboard. One for the mouse. One for the printer.
    So, that leaves you with exactly one USB port (I'm discounting the two USB 2.0 ones).
    When you throw away your old keyboard and mouse, keep around that old USB hub. You might need it.
    As for the three PCI slots: Video capture card, decent sound card, SCSI ports. There goes my scalability, I guess....

    1. Re:Not so many ports... by red5 · · Score: 2

      Given that it throws away all legacy ports, I'd say it's pretty short in USB ports. One ofr the keyboard. One for the mouse. One for the printer. So, that leaves you with exactly one USB port (I'm discounting the two USB 2.0 ones). When you throw away your old keyboard and mouse, keep around that old USB hub. You might need it. As for the three PCI slots: Video capture card, decent sound card, SCSI ports. There goes my scalability, I guess....

      Well the USB 2.0 ports are backwards compatible and the mouse can and should be chained from the keyboad so yes you have a lot of free ports.
      Most keyboards have two extra ports I use one for my mouse and one for my camera.

      As for the pci slots the onboard sound looks fine to me.
      It has optical ins for god sakes. What more do you want?
      It also has an onboard nic card and that saves you another slot.

      --
      I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
    2. Re:Not so many ports... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      onboard sound is traditionally, crap.
      I don't know why, it doesn't have to be. My SOYO DRAGON onboard sounds sucks hind tit.
      at least onboard nics have been getting better.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Not so many ports... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not that it applies to the abit board but nforce based boards have better sound than any consumer level card you can buy... and with digital out & optical in and 5.1 support it doesn't sound like it's a piece of crap (no pun intended)

  33. Re:Completely useless by macrom · · Score: 1

    Wrong. TRUE geeks buy hardware 'cause it's new and 'cause it lets you do more things faster. Maybe you wanna play Everquest on a machine with an ISA video card, but I'll keep my GeForce for fun gaming, thank you. And I don't feel like compiling my code and a 286, so my shiny new Pentium 4 will do nicely.

    People who hang onto stuff that's old and crusty and then sneer at people who want something modern are called packrats and old codgers.

  34. an issue to ponder by Angela+Lansbury · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The last time I bought one of their motherboards my man friend and I accidentally got it wet during a rousing round of watersports and it never worked correctly.

    --
    mass mounds of mctasty manchowder
  35. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed (Page 2) by xkenny13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    [Page 2 is also pretty interesting ... then it delves into BIOS screen shots and benchmarks]
    .
    .
    .

    Got Storage?

    Have a look at the vast number of ATA connectors - 6 channels! The yellow connectors are for the Highpoint ATA/133 RAID controller (which works perfectly fine in non-RAID mode). The two higher up on the board are the natively controlled IDE channels, also supporting ATA/133. This makes for an amazing 12 possible drives without the use of a single PCI slot!

    Below the RAID channels you'll see a floppy adapter, one of the lingering legacy ports still found on this generation of MAX boards... I personally don't use a floppy drive anymore, but it will be necessary to use a floppy if you plan on installing Windows XP on a drive controlled by the Highpoint IDE. How ironic!

    Besides what I've mentioned, and the fact that there are 4 RAM slots (up to three 1GB sticks may be used at a time with non-registered RAM, four if you are using registered), the layout is pretty much standard ATX fare. There are a couple nasty layout problems though, which I'll get to later in the review.

    In addition to the 6 USB ports on the ATX rear panel (4 USB1.1 and 2 USB2.0), there are onboard connectors for 4 more USB 2.0 connectors, for a total of 10 devices! There is also an extra output for one more IEEE1394 port. The IEEE1394 controller used by the AT7 is capable of full speed 400mb/sec. So no matter what interface your advanced external peripherals are going to use, Abit definitely has you covered with the AT7.

    Once again, Abit gets unique with the AT7, this time with the bundle. Included are a set of nifty black IDE cables (3 IDE cables, 1 floppy cable). This is a great way to have some nice looking custom IDE cables without worrying about using rounded cables (IDE cables are flat for a reason you know!). Also included are a set of cable tie-downs, to aide in keeping your PC nice and tidy inside. This is a great little bundle for a motherboard! A custom ATX rear panel plate is also included of course; the one that came with your case is now officially outdated. You also get one PCI plate USB adapter, to be used on one of the USB2.0 outputs on the motherboard. I would have liked to see a pair of these, in addition to another firewire adapter, since the board supports it. Unfortunately, you're going to have to get your own this time.

    MediaXP

    One significant absence in our package (I believe Abit is going to make it an option for some retail packages) is a MediaXP panel! MediaXP is one of the great steps forward with the MAX series. Basically, it adds integrated support for various portable media, including Smart Media, Compact Flash, and even Sony's Memory Stick. MediaXP also includes headphone and microphone jacks, SPDIF ports, and 2 USB ports! It is expected that most cases will start using MediaXP panels, rather than their own Mickey Mouse panels you see now. It is already beginning to look like the MAX is taking the PC a step in the right direction...

  36. USB Keyboard. by Rydian · · Score: 1

    Pretty cool that you would need a USB keyboard with this, now if I could only find one without those annoying windows keys, clicky keyboard would be even better.

    Sadly that's all thats holding me to using PS/2, the lack of a decent USB 101-key (not 104-key) clicky keyboard.

    --
    chown -R us. /base
    1. Re:USB Keyboard. by greenfly · · Score: 2

      I'm not understanding what's wrong with having extra keys on the keyboard. I have my windows keys mapped to Meta and Multi_key, and it's nice to map the windows key to pop up my enlightenment menu.

      I even mapped all of the new "internet" keys on the top of my keyboard, and have a few of the set for quick access to a terminal.

    2. Re:USB Keyboard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The problem is aesthetic, not functional. Some folks don't like advertisements on their shirts, cars, or keyboards. Frankly I think extending this opinion to consumer electronics is a losing battle: you've got SONY on your monitor and LINKSYS on your firewall and there's no changing that. I guess the primary difference is that you've got an advertisement for a product you not only haven't bought, but wouldn't recommend, when you have Windows keys on your keyboard.

      That was kinda rambly but I hope that illustrates what the problem can be.

    3. Re:USB Keyboard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the logo on the keyboard bothers you so much, buy a file and stop whining. I haven't looked at the keys on my keyboard for days, better worry about those logos.

    4. Re:USB Keyboard. by ljaguar · · Score: 1

      Actually there is a good solution to this.
      Sun Type 6 USB keyboard with such layout.

      I don't know how clicky they are, but they are beyond "no-windows". They are SUN.

      Can you say geek points?

      Until I can get my hand on one of them, I've got my (windows) keyboard mapped to Sun Type5 style. But I've heard of "Unix" style Type6 usb.

      Ones I've linked to have Sum Type5c layout (aka PC style with the bastardation of ctrl and esc)

      If you mod me offtopic, I will buy you the original reddish iMac.

    5. Re:USB Keyboard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using one of these Sun Type 6 USB Keyboards on a Windows box works great. In fact, that's what I'm using right now at work. Well, that and a Type-6 "Crossbow" Sub USB mouse.

      The odd thing is, the Sun meta key (the diamond key) actually works as a Windows key. Tap it once and up comes your start menu. Funky.

  37. Re:Completely useless by Elbereth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish motherboard manufacturers would stop integrating all this useless stuff. I don't want integrated sound, IDE RAID, or any of that other junk. I don't even particularly care for integrated IDE.

    Think of how much more stable the motherboards would be if there were less chips present and less IRQs being shared. Oh yeah, in theory PCI is supposed to share IRQs with no problem, but that doesn't mean it actually works out that way in practice.

    There wouldn't be much cost savings associated with getting rid of these functions, but spending $5 or $10 less on a product is always nice.

    And, no, sometimes you can't just turn these features off in the BIOS. Even worse, sometimes there's no way to reclaim the IRQs that are lost due to integrated functions! Check out some of the really bad implementations out there. It's a nightmare trying to make those poorly designed boards work. Abit is not known for their stability or great design, so I don't have much faith in this motherboard. Even if Asus made a board like this, I would have some trouble trusting it.

    Getting rid of the PS/2 ports is just asinine. They are an industry standard. USB sucks. PS/2 works.

  38. Re:Completely useless by JesseL · · Score: 2

    Just who do you expect is buying new motherboards? People hoping to drop in a replacement for the dead mobo in their XT? If you're happy with legacy ports and busses, nobody is forcing you to upgrade. For me, the next time I build a PC, I'd rather not have interrupts and physical space taken up by interfaces I haven't used in at least three years.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  39. Re:Completely useless by brer_rabbit · · Score: 5, Funny
    I've got plenty of working ISA cards. TRUE geeks don't buy new hardware just because it's new. TRUE geeks keep working shit working. People who buy the latest and greatest the second it comes out are called wannabe's.

    So, why exactly are you not only reading, but also posting, to Slashdot?

  40. Re:Completely useless by NineNine · · Score: 2

    TRUE geeks know how to get X Windows working without the latest and greatest.

    Poverty ain't the issue. It's the fact that any kid can go down to the local store and buy the latest shit every week. That's fucking lame. Get an old box working well, and that's fucking cool.

  41. Re:I think they're smoking ABIT of crack over ther by ergo98 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Most of the "Cutting edge" Linux crowd are busy crowing about how they still have their 486 running fine, and how a Athlon XP is far more power than any reasonable man should ever need, so get yerself a 386 damnit. I hardly think Abit is targetting the Linux crowd.

    As a "cutting edge" Windows user I have 6 USB devices connected to my PC right now (yup, it's Windows XP, though my cool factor is accomplished by saying that my webserver/firewall/NAT router is a FreeBSD box) and I have never had anything but good experiences with them.

  42. Re:Completely useless by AntiNorm · · Score: 5, Funny

    TRUE geeks buy hardware 'cause it's new and 'cause it lets you do more things faster.

    Actually, true geeks design their own hardware from the circuit level up.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  43. Stupid wast of space by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

    You want more USB ports, get a USB hub, they're cheap, their easy, and they work fine. I have 2 USB ports on my computer, one is broken, I got a 4 port USB hub, so now I can plug in my printer, scanner, CF/SM card reader, and my MP3 player. If I need more ports, I'll go get another hub, or a bigger (8 port) hub. USB has been designed this way so you wouldn't need that many ports on the computer.

    More firewire ports would be better. I've never seen a firewire hub, and if they are out there, they're probably expensive.

    1. Re:Stupid wast of space by bgarland · · Score: 1

      This good enought for ya?

      firewiredirect

      For example a 6-port powered FW hub is $70


      Ben

    2. Re:Stupid wast of space by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

      Yah, and my 4 port USB hub was only $12.. I would much rather have more firewire ports onboard, then USB ports.

    3. Re:Stupid wast of space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firewire is ment to be dasiy chained. For instance my CD burner has two ports on the back one for in and one for out.

    4. Re:Stupid wast of space by bmoore · · Score: 1

      So you have 2 USB ports, but only 1 works. Now add a USB keyboard to your mix. SCREWED! Why? Well, I don't remember the details, but from what I remember, USB keyboards need to be directly connected to the computer, and cannot go through a USB hub.

      Of course that could just be my particular keyboard. (Sun Type6 USB, on my x86 Linux Box)

    5. Re:Stupid wast of space by Sc00ter · · Score: 1

      Or you could get many of the fine USB keyboards out there that have built in USB hubs. Even the apple ones that come with the iMacs have another port (yes, it's for the mouse, but you could plug a hub into that)

    6. Re:Stupid wast of space by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

      Could be true for a possibly extra-magic "boot keyboard" (if the BIOS is set to do keyboard emulation), but that's certainly not true in general. I've sometimes amused myself by plugging in a cheap USB keyboard into my little 4-port USB hub, with the machine running, and just typing away on it. All without disconnecting my regular name brand PS/2 keyboard, of course. Oh, and that's under Linux, too, if anyone was still having doubts about USB capabilities there. Now, if only said name brand actually had a USB model available here... ;^)

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  44. ABIT's Media Sheet by svferris · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a link to ABIT's media sheet on the motherboard, which gives a good rundown of the new features of the board, as well as what they were thinking when designing it.

    ABIT MAX Media Sheet

  45. Odd URL... by seldolivaw · · Score: 1

    "Hardcoreware.net"? Are you sure this isn't porn spam?

    /.ed anyway, so it doesn't matter...

  46. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least I'll be learning something useful rather than 70's technology - and in that I include unix. Heh!

  47. Final result by QuodEratDemonstratum · · Score: 1
    • Abit's choice of onboard audio is questionable
    • Extremely high priced
    Final Score - 98%!


    So you need a second mortgage and a new sound card ... but it is still practically perfect?

    1. Re:Final result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention, they used a realtek onboard nic.. yuck

  48. Terabyte system for the masses? by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Interesting
    4 Channels on an integrated RAID controller? Lets see, with 8x 120GB drives, that gives you 960GB, at less than $2000 for the entire system (assuming this board will be less than $200). Not quite a terabyte, but if you moved to 8x 160GB drives, that gives you about 1.3TB, but makes it quite a bit more expensive.


    Not that you would _want_ to put 8 drives in a RAID 0 array. The chances of failure and total data loss are just too high. But it's cool that you can.


    12 friggin' IDE channels. The mind boggles. Perhaps I can finally use up all the bays in my full-size tower. It looks mighty pathetic with just my CDRW and a floppy.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by tcc · · Score: 2

      Thing is 4 Channels with IDE raid means 4 CHANNELS, if you put it Slave/master, even if you can stick up 8 drives, it won't go faster than it would with 4 drives as masters.

      If you are serious about buying 12 drives to make a datacenter or a half-decent raid, unless you go with old drives or buy a buttload of 20-40gigs for next to nothing, You'd probably have the budget to get a REAL raid card that does decent raid5 performance like a 3Ware 7810 (8 channels, 64 bits, 48bits LBA, all the goodies plus not limited to standard PCI 33mhz/32bits speed) And if you're a bit richer, maybe a 7850 (more cache for raid 5 performance), else there's always cheaper 6810 boards that run on a standard PCI bus, either way, it'll give you FAR better performance than this board.

      Of course, if it's to brag that your board can take 12 drives and want to connect your mom's 40megs and the brother's older 1gig drive and so on... that's another story

      --
      --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    2. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by bravehamster · · Score: 2, Funny
      I know that having 8 drive wouldn't make it go faster than 4 drives. Speed wasn't what I was talking about, merely being able to have a single logical drive over a terabyte. Hmm...terabyte...it just rolls off the tongue. Size, not speed. Because we all know that in the end, despite what the ladies say, size does matter ;)

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    3. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by neafevoc · · Score: 1
      12 friggin' IDE channels. The mind boggles. Perhaps I can finally use up all the bays in my full-size tower. It looks mighty pathetic with just my CDRW and a floppy.


      See, I'd like to do that too, but I think I'll wait until I see these boards with SerialATA. Just for the sake of neatness and air flow, you know? (My computer cooks with that AMD XP and nvidia chip in the summer time.)

      I also have another question to those who could answer it... is it possible to create a nice solution to utilize all these IDE channels outside the case?

      I'm sure I could drag a long IDE cable to some external case for HDD drives. But I don't want to just keep it hanging out of the case. (Are there plates that have these kind of connectors that go from internal to external?)

      Just curious.
    4. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by bravehamster · · Score: 1
      I'm not certain, but I think the maximum length for ATA100/133 cables is 18in, and ATA33/66 is 24 inches. So having an external container isn't gonna work for this. If you want a large number of cheap external IDE drives, they make SCSI>IDE containers that run a large number of IDE drives over an external SCSI link. Hot-swappable too, which is always neat if you can foot the bill.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    5. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      What is the maximium memory for the current AMD/Via/Sis chipsets ? Anyone? As accessing a terabyte constantly would be ass slow without a serious chunk of memory.

    6. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by neafevoc · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info.

      As I sort of mentioned before, I prefer the external hard drives when it comes to extra hard drives. (I'll always put the OS drive in the system... just 'cause) :)

      That's why I was thinking about getting some x9160 card and go through the external route.

      Of course, when *that* time comes, I'm not too sure what the specs for SerialATA will be.

    7. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not that you were going to rush out and set up your terabyte array, but here's a word of caution anyway. Terabyte filesystems aren't that common among Linux and FreeBSD users (which I know for sure; I'll bet NetBSD users aren't real interested, either...;-) That means they aren't well tested. Furthermore, there are limits to what is supported. For instance, the 160MB drives aren't supported in linux 2.4 yet, and filesystems have maximum sizes.

      Before anyone decides to invest heavily in a terabyte+ array thinking they'll access it as a single logical device, I recommend investing some time reading the linux kernel mailing list, or do similar reading for the OS of choice. Along with some friends, I've spent a lot of time looking at these issues lately, and there are a lot of "gotchas" for unwary users (which almost included us).

      -Paul Komarek

    8. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      depends on your mobo..some support up to 2 gig, but most 4 gigs. practically, most mobos include only 2 ddr slots (except this one) and gig sticks are hard to find, so 512*4=2 gigs cache. that's nothing.

    9. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by RennieScum · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they didn't *test* it. They didn't test the Highpoint, didn't test the IEEE 1394, used PC2100 memory...kinda lame test setup, huh? Do some DV captures onto yer 250GB RAID 5 setup and I'll consider it a good review!

      Hey, I still have yet to use the Highpoint on my KT7A...

      It looks like a solid board, and even for ~$200, it's worth it to not have to buy/config sound, ethernet, firewire so you can get right to overclocking. And with the absence of a jillion PCI cards means more room for custom cooling rigs and better airflow!

      --
      ...Time is the best teacher, unfortunately it kills all of its students.
    10. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by dufke · · Score: 1

      Of course, when *that* time comes, I'm not too sure what the specs for SerialATA will be.

      With the current trend, it will be able transfer 1Tb/s, at a maximum cable length of ONE inch. ;-)

      --
      __
      Comment submitted. There will be a delay before you understand what you posted.
    11. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      It's OK if you use XFS and software RAID.

      Last I checked, most people were having problems creating single non-raid block devices larger than 1TB, but I think that is mostly fixed, except for some overflows that cause numbers to be reported incorrectly. This means you have hardware RAID that makes a single sda or hda device that is larger than one TB. This can be avoided by breaking up the hardware RAID into multiple devices and using software raid on those. (use it to your advantage and implement RAID 10, or RAID 0 (software) over 5 (hardware))

      You are correct in that there are a lot of little gotchas. I built a Linux system at work with 1.9TB of space in an single md device using the XFS stock kernel with no extra patches though, so it isn't too bad.

      I was able to put EXT3 on it, but if you don't have 2 days to waste waiting for mkfs to finish, you need to tell it to only put one inode per 4 megs. This means that if most of your files will be less than 4 megs, you are going to run out of inodes before the file system is full.

      XFS has no such problem, and only takes a few seconds to mkfs, but takes a little longer to mount each time.

      It is definitely something that can be done at home, it's just not going to be quite as trivial as making a normal sized volume.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by CharlieO · · Score: 1

      Just to reinforce the previous comment I've personally seen a 36 drive 160GB raid array running stock RedHat 7.2

      So I think this means the kernel supports 160 drives.

      It was built as a large data store for Astronomical Data and provides around 5 terrabytes usable, cost around 15,000UKP. It runs an XFS file system because
      1) SGI has used it for a while and its stable and has a track record, unlike ReiserFS or EXT3 (Not that I make judgements on this, but if you are going to commit expensive data to the disks you want to be sure.
      2) It serves an environment of large SGI Origin machines and so integrates seemlessly.

      For the techies:

      - 36 160GB EIDE Maxtor Units in hot swap carriers for the array
      - 1 80GB EIDE Maxtor Unit for boot and host drive
      - one EIDE CDrom. (No Floppy :)
      - Twin Athlon DDR motherboard heavy on RAM
      - Twin Gigabit Ethernet cards into local backbone switch.
      - 4 3Ware EIDE hardware raid cards.[www.3ware.com]

      Config -
      The 3Ware cards provide a SCSI host adabpter to the OS, so they look like a single SCSI drive once they are configured.

      The CDrom and Boot/Host drive are on the Mothboard normal EIDE channels.

      Each 3ware card has eight drives in a Raid 5 configuration, each drive with a private EIDE channel (no slave drives here)

      The 4 3ware cards are then software raided as 4 SCSI devices.

      The array itself is split logically into volumes to make it easier to manage.

      By all accounts the biggest problem was threading 38 individual EIDE cables through the server case, and finding power supplies big enough to keep the disks and fans spinning.

      So this is possible right now, I've seen it from stock parts, it took around a working week to build (hardware and software) and it kicks butt :)

    13. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by rich22 · · Score: 3, Funny

      For instance, the 160MB drives aren't supported in linux 2.4 yet, and filesystems have maximum sizes.

      No wonder I can't get my 486sx/25 w/ 16mb of ram and a 160mb HDD to run this crazy Linux!!!

    14. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by TarpaKungs · · Score: 2, Informative
      Slight deviation of topic

      The parent post deserves a reply - not because I disagree (Paul is right to offer caution) but because I can add something here. Feel free to mod me offtopic.

      I can confirm that linux handles TB filesystems reliably in my limited experience

      Where I work (Imperial College, London) we have an online backup system consisting of 16 disks on a Chaparral RAID controller hanging off a cheap 1U Intel box. Using some perl I wrote in conbination with rsync, we pull copies of most data (shared group, sysadmin stuff, home dirs) onto this array - keeping a full copy and a week's worth of "reverse diffs" (files which have been updated, but I got rsync to kick them sideways rather than deleting them).

      Whole lot is NFS and samba exported so short term file recovery is DIY for the users (saves a *lot* of time).

      Anyway - here's the df -lk listing:

      Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
      /dev/vg00/lvexport1 1050132564 822295616 227836948 79% /export/recover

      You'll notice that I'm using LVM - which in itself has a 1TB limit on the size of a single logical volume (well right now it does on the version I'm using).

      Next version of my code will deal with pools of disk so I don't have to use LVM anymore. The filesystem is ext3 running on SuSE 7.2 with a locally patched build of 2.4.17.

      Approximately 3-5GB of files are moved every night and it has (fingers crossed) been very reliable.
      My advice would be to stick to ext3. Reiserfs I used at home and it was very reliable. But on 180 odd lab PCs we have, where Reiserfs is used on /, we have found that odd system crashes *can* sometimes result in null data or even randon data (extents from other files or off the free list) have ended up inside live files, like /etc/passwd, which isn't very convenient ;-)
      I've seem XFS leave files full of null data under similar circumstances. So I actually think, for the hack that it is, ext3 gives a certain warm feeling on those sorts of filesystems. Ext3 even on a system which was crashing due to a mixture of (older) kernel problems and flaky firmware on the RAID never lost anything (at least as far as we've noticed).

      So far so good. Your milage may vary of course. And do as Paul says - check the limits of the drives and the filesystems you are thinking of using.

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    15. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Highpoint works fine, both as a standard IDE controller, and as a RAID. Current 2.4 kernels have highpoint included, and you can boot off the RAID if you compile it in.

      I tested the hardware RAID, but speed was only slightly better than software RAID, so I run as a software RAID just to guarantee I can grab any old motherboard and get it back up if hardware ever fails.

    16. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palestines SUCK. Death to them all.

    17. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by mwillis · · Score: 2

      I'm curious if the configurer considered JBOD and software raid5?

      I have one of the cheapie 3ware cards (6400, $100 on sale). When configuring I read an interesting web page (Google cache) about using arrays of 6800's in JBOD mode (and letting the O/S do the RAID5 math.)

      The advantage to this is that if you have 32 drives, you have 31 drives worth of information and 1 drive of redundancy information. With four 8-drive cards, you get 1 raid5 checksum drive per sub-array and hence only 28 drives worth of information.

      Of course the 6xxx series has poor performance raid5 anyway, so software raid5 makes more sense.

    18. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Just remember, any PowerPC based Mac, which is just about any Mac made after 1994 with four digits in the model number or any of the Macs made after 1997 with no model number, running MacOS 7.5.5, which was released in 1996, or newer can use logical drives up to 2 TB.
      You would probably want to use MacOS 8.1 and HFS+ because if you use an older version of MacOS you will be forced to use HFS standard. Due to a limitation with HFS standard, with a 2TB volume the smallest file size would be 32MB. On a hypothetical 2TB HFS standard volume even if the file contained the letter "a" it would still be 32MB.
      On the other hand it would take a good deal of engineering and coding to even approach 2TB of storage on a 6200 which only has narrow SCSI, supports only one IDE drive and has only a 68030 PDS slot for expansion. Or for that matter why you would want to do it on a 6500 which at least has two PCI slots, but will not work with PCI to PCI bridge chips due to ROM bugs. The maximum amount of RAM the 6500 can use is 128 MB without some serious soldering and then even the theoretical max would be 192MB, not that I have ever heard of anyone doing this. I guess what I am saying is that the 6500 would make a poor choice for a server of a very large database .

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    19. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by WNight · · Score: 2

      A consideration is that you may want more parity drives. Most drives tend to die for a reason, such as a power surge, or when shut down. This means that you're more likely to see a couple drives go at once than you would be if they just died during normal operation. Because of this, RAID units actually tend to lose a few drives at once even if the MTBF suggests otherwise.

      So, if you have one 35+1 array, losing any two drives could kill it.

      If you have four 7+1 arrays RAID 0ed together and lose two drives, there's a 1/4 chance that both drives were on the same array, which would kill it.

      You could do four 6+2 arrays, but then you only get 3/4 of the space you paid for. That does take your safety margin to three disks, and only 1/16th of the time. That's probably safe enough to trust.

      But ideally you'd do one large 28+4 array, without much more loss of space than originally (7/8ths usable) and it could tolerate the loss of any four drives, regardless of location. But I don't think that's possible with these cards, given that each controls only eight drives.

      So you could do a software 3+1 RAID5 of four 7+1 arrays, which would tolerate the loss of any one array, which would happen 1/4 of the time with a two drive loss. But you're now back under the 3/4 usable space (21/32 actually) which starts to suck.

      Unfortunately, there just isn't a good way to do it with that many drives and hardware RAID 5 that only supports eight at a time.

    20. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      The problematic details to which I was referring occur at the filesystem level. I haven't seen anything suggesting that software or hardware RAID or linux's lvm layer isn't up to it (though it seems like I remember something vague about possible problems with FreeBSD's vinum). It's ext[23] and UFS that seem to have some issues with really large volumes. And even if there weren't any reports, building a terabyte+ filesystem puts you in a small class of users whose needs are not mainstream. The significance of this is the amount of debugging and fiddling you have to do, or stability problems you have to tolerate. Ask any linux/Alpha user what I mean. =-/

      Some posts here have suggested that many of the little gotchas have been taken care of, and also that XFS is doing a good job on really large filesystems. This is all good news. However, it is my opinion that until the new IDE stuff in linux 2.5 solidifies and is backported to 2.4 (or released in 2.6!), big filesystems on linux will have "issues" (even if they aren't bugs). I think the next FreeBSD release ought to clear up a lot of this stuff, too.

      What I'd really like is for Andre Hedrick to reply to my posts and prove me wrong!

      -Paul Komarek

    21. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      EXT does seem to not be designed with TB+ in mind. As I said, the file system creation is very slow with any more than one inode per 4 or 8 megs, taking up to 8 hours to complete. Also, fsck takes fscking forever.

      One of the things is that the IDE layer stuff doesn't matter with 3ware cards, because of the SCSI virtual interface they provide, so most of us terabyters are immune to those.

      I have seen people with promise type cards have major troubles getting tons of hdX type devices to work well.

      Your point is taken, there are issues a home user would not normally be exposed to, but that happens anytime a user goes off the beaten track.

      If it were trivial to build such large systems, it would be hard to impress your friends with it. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  49. Welcome Abit, seriously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple ditched legacy ports with the first iMac, four years ago.

    Intel followed Apple's lead and started promoting "Legacy free PCs" within a year of the iMac's release. Some PC integrators such as Compaq tried to follow suit, with products such as the iPaq legacy-free desktop (not to be confused with the iPaq handheld, which was a completely different kind of device and came later).

    Most legacy-free PC designs failed. Why is it so exciting that a board-maker has released a legacy-free board 4 years too late?

  50. Beware a gimmick... but Abit does some good stuff by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

    Novelty do it because we can is not for mission critical stuff... we all know it... and until the board is proven in combat that's what I'm taking this as... For instance the BP6 was rock solid for some people... mine never worked... but I now own two KT7A boards and you can't beat them up unless you threw them out the window. I for one hope this turns out to be one of their better boards... They've taken huge risks to please the geek population and as a result run my favorite machines... As for 12 IDE devices anyone know of a case that can cram that much into it?!

  51. Re:I think they're smoking ABIT of crack over ther by Kenshin · · Score: 1, Troll
    "What about us Linux folks who don't use much USB because the drivers haven't been written yet?"

    I know this is going to get trolled down, but you have two options:

    1) Buy a different motherboard. They sell more than one, you know.

    2) Use an OS that actually has *features*, instead of constantly bitching that your OS doesn't support hardware any newer than two years old.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  52. 3 PCI? by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ATM I have TV card, Sound Card, and NIC in my system; sure, this system's got on board NIC and sound, but so what? I have an SB Live that'll beat most on board stuff (well, maybe, I'm not a great fan of Live's anymore :), and needing another NIC isn't that unlikely; 3 is definately going to feel cramped.

    1. Re:3 PCI? by Kallahar · · Score: 2

      I've got a SBLive also, but it's now sitting in a box. I found that the Asus KT266E (I think) has an onboard sound card that sounds just as good as the live. IANAA (I am not an audiophile) though.

      Not THAT many people need dual nic's, most just connect dirrect or to a hub or DSL router.

      I run out of slots by having: SCSII controller, two extra video cards (three monitors).

      So yeah, even if they just added one more it would probably be nice, there's always more stuff to plug in that's cool :)

    2. Re:3 PCI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      uhm... it has onboard *digital out* for sound, it's pretty hard to make a digital signal sound bad since all the d/a is done off the board. I'd bet dollars to dimes that it'll sound just as good as a SBLive 5.1

    3. Re:3 PCI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to replace the onchip sound, why not go USB? SB's new Extigy (external Audigy) is USB and comes with all the features of the internal Audigy. I'm seriously considering it for my next audio system, and as a plus I could use it on my laptop.

    4. Re:3 PCI? by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      The system's also got optical outputs, so while it won't work for 3d-sound-enabled games, it'll do for just about anything else. It may not be an extigy, but it's not going to kill you to shelve the SB Live if you need the PCI slot. So you could get by with two PCI slots, if you had USB 2.0 and Firewire, couldn't you?
      I've got an Abit NV7-133R sitting in the box that comes with what is probably the same audio setup they talk about, sitting here by my desk. I'm still waiting for the case, so admittedly I have not listened to it, but if it is as I'm told it is, you won't complain. Mine has optical input and output, minijacks for mic and line-in and one each for front left/right, rear left/right, and center channel/subwoofer. I'm going to have to buy another set of speakers, because my SB Live Value card only does front/rear left/right, so I don't have a center channel. So you're down to your TV Card.
      Even though I'd rather not use their drivers for the sound card, I still hope your TV card's this: Creative's Video Blaster Digital VCR
      That TV card encodes mpeg-2 in real time, and you can schedule record times. I bought one of those and a couple of 80gb HDs I'm going to stipe together--the board's got built-in RAID via HighPoint HPT372! (And the thing was only $137 w/second day air!). I figure at 1.1mbps, I can fit over 300 hours of TV shows. Or if I figure out a way to convert to divx via a batch file, I might pull 500 hours. And then there're CDs.
      Did you ever just want to have your own library of TV at your fingertips? South Park, Saturday Night Live, Movies, MST3k(saturday mornings!!), MTV, a complete season of Broncos Football, whatever flips your cookie. And it's not even unethical. Total cost to me: $300 for TV card and HDs, plus CDRs, which are cheeeep.
      I'm building the full system for $900, Monitor and all, and it's got an Athlon XP 1800+ and GF2 video. while I could easily pay more for things such as an Extigy, it's not worth so much more money when these new motherboards are so good.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    5. Re:3 PCI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were an audiophile, the last thing you'd do is buy a Creative product. They're like the Wal-Mart of audio.

    6. Re:3 PCI? by wysoft · · Score: 1

      Yes, I don't understand why they just left three slots onboard and decided that it should be enough. Should it really be that hard to add a second PCI bridge so that there can be more than three PCI slots?

      --
      -- I'll cut you up so bad, you'll wish I'd never cut you up so bad!
    7. Re:3 PCI? by Akumapwr · · Score: 1

      PCI 1 = SCSI controller PCI 2 = Gigabit Ethernet PCI 3 = TV board/second video card PCI 4 = Possible Sound card Now here's the problem, I don't know one person who has ever gotten all these devices working together smoothly. Yeah seems likely but who do you know has 6 pci cards all working together?

    8. Re:3 PCI? by hendridm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the point is to upgrade with USB devices. NICs and video are available for USB. Perhaps not the best support yet, but I think they are try to pioneer a move toward more development of more non-PCI devices.

    9. Re:3 PCI? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      A bbs with analog modem multiplexers.

    10. Re:3 PCI? by Akumapwr · · Score: 1

      Noticed in the last message I put "All these devices working correctly". Yeah there are PCI extenders that have 20 slows, passive backplane ring a bell?

      Add some scsi, ethernet (IRQ busmaster devices) and your'll find yourself with a non-workable machine.

    11. Re:3 PCI? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      I am an audiophile. That's why I don't listen to music on computers. Not only can't you get truly good, uncompromising sound equipment in a small space filled with electrical noise (i.e. your computer), but computer fans wipe out significant audio detail.

      If you really care about sound, you have a special room for listening, and you won't have your PC in there. Why would anyone spend serious money on audio equipment, and then ruin the sound with computer fans, keyboard and mouse clicks? If you really care about sound, you focus on it while you listen -- that means you aren't surfing the web, writing code, and sending email.

      All of that said, I'm also a grad student and spend almost all day, every day writing code and sending email. So my "budget" audio equipment (NAD, because I can't afford the "real" stuff or the listening room to go with it) is in the same room as my computers. If I'm lucky (i.e. once a month), I'll have some time at the end of the day to turn the computers off and do some listening.

      -Paul Komarek

    12. Re:3 PCI? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I am an audiophile. That's why I don't listen to music on computers.

      That's funny. I always thought the definition of an audiophile was someone who listens to the equipment rather than the music. ;-)

      >If you really care about sound

      You buy some decent headphones.

      Don't take it too seriously, the fans are a little annoying when I'm listening to MP3s so I have a separate room with another amp in it, but I've given up the term "audiophile" when I relised it put me in the same class as people who buy BOSE. :)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    13. Re:3 PCI? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      "That's funny. I always thought the definition of an audiophile was someone who listens to the equipment rather than the music. ;-)"

      "but I've given up the term "audiophile" when I relised it put me in the same class as people who buy BOSE. :)"

      Now those are some funny quotes. =-) I only use the term "audiophile" when defending the interests of people with good ears. That said, it's probably better to buy season tickets for the best seats in the house, than to drop enormous sums of money on audio equipment.

      I helped a friend build a recording rig, and in the end we gave up on making it quiet and found good headphones. Someday, maybe, I'll try water cooling.

      -Paul Komarek

  53. Re:Completely useless by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want to congratulate the company on making a motherboard that is virtually useless to anybody who isn't bleeding edge. I don't even have a single USB device, and I still use ISA cards extensively because they'er so damn cheap.

    I used to do that. Then I decided that I'd rather not have to beat my head against a wall mucking with IRQ conflicts and port addresses to save $10.

    USB keyboards are dirt cheap. USB mice are dirt cheap. If you're shelling out for a new system in the first place, replacing keyboards and mice are a negligeable cost (and you'd want new ones regardless, so that you can still keep the old machine active).

    Graphics-wise, I'd have to be paid a lot of money to go back to using a graphics card obsolete enough to be ISA, even if all I'm doing is running a 2D desktop. Network-wise, PCI network cards are *almost* as dirt-cheap as your keyboard and mouse.

    In summary: If you're buying a new motherboard at all, you can afford to upgrade the peripherals.

  54. I like my peripherals, thanks. by SamIIs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quoth the review:
    It is FINALLY time to get rid of that old mouse... While you're at it, toss out that old Dot Matrix printer, and even the $13 keyboard with the ASDFJKL: keys completely rubbed off!

    Ya know, I really like my peripherals. I have a great Gateway Programmable keyboard that has built-in hardware macros (so it's not OS dependant) and a slick logitech trackball that fits my hand well. My printer is pretty crummy, but it has this great ability to turn text into physical paper, which is all I need.

    Having a motherboard which boasts of the ability to make me buy new hardware isn't quite what I'm looking for.

    Sam

    1. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a PS/2 to USB adapter. Looks like the PS/2 port is going to go away before my Model M does, so I'll eventually have to go that route.

    2. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by dimator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having a motherboard which boasts of the ability to make me buy new hardware isn't quite what I'm looking for.

      Well, I doubt it's really aimed at people with old peripherals. It's intended for new machines with new everything.

      And you can't really blame them for trying to cut off old technologies... someone had to start doing it, or we'd be using old standards forever. Remember the old, big, round keyboard adaptor? (I dont even remember what it was called.) If manufacturers never said "OK, enoughs enough, PS/2 or the highway from now on" we'd still be stuck with that crap. You got to make sacrifices if you want progress.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    3. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The port is the same albet a smaller size, nothinbg else has changed, Just have a look at the PS/2 (also known as mini-DIN) to 5 pin DIN converters. They are just a wire linking 1 pin to the equivilent.

    4. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by Arandir · · Score: 2

      Ditto. I have a Logitech Trackman with three, count them, three buttons. And no fscking scroll wheel! Nobody makes anything even close to this anymore.

      I'm with you. I'm not going to throw away my mouse, my laserjet, my UPS or my keyboard. I finally got an AGP video card, so I'm guessing I still have three months of life in it before someone comes up with another standard...

      p.s. If anyone has, or knows where I can get another of these trackballs new, let me know...

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    5. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by pennsol · · Score: 1

      FYI that would be a DIN 5 connector...i still have a few of those converters laying about just in case i come across a dinosour..:)

      --

      Just Limin' Mon

    6. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha my mouse has 1.6' more buttons than yours

    7. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by Erik+Fish · · Score: 1

      Good God, you're right! I almost forgot how much faster I was suddenly able to type after I switched to a PS/2 keyboard!

      I'm all for new things as long as they're really and truly better. Unfortunately DIN 5 connectors are (still) perfectly suitable and USB was intentionally designed by Intel to suck CPU.

    8. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by davros74 · · Score: 1

      I have one of those Gateway Anykey-124 Programmable keyboards and they rock. I wish I had this keyboard at work on my Sun.
      No one I've seen makes a keyboard like this anymore:
      Two complete sets of function keys, directional arrow keys
      with diagonals (in addition to numeric keypad), FULL sized
      enter key (the proper size), no windows keys (two-Alts and two-Ctrls, imagine that!), and can be fully remappable and macro programmable via EEPROM in the keyboard itself (and backed up to a file via a DOS program).

      I like this keyboard so much that I bought a few extras on eBay to put in my closet as backup for when this one bites the dust.

      I cannot stand any of the newer keyboards with windows keys and stupid internet/email keys that can only be programmed with Windows drivers to do nothing more fancy than open up IE or Outlook. I want a keyboard that I can program vim macros onto and those macros persist in Windows or Linux. It's also
      a Godsend to be able to put the left control key back where it is supposed to be, where the CAPS LOCK is. (Who actually uses CAPS LOCK anyway???)

    9. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by belroth · · Score: 1
      And it was really bright to make the keyboard and mouse connectors identical. If you're lucky there's a little picture next to the connector, or they're colour coded, but when you've got your head under a desk reaching for the back of the box that's not a lot of help....

      I know USB removes this problem but at work we can't use USB because NT doesn't. (I know, but I'm not the CTO)

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    10. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by Zocalo · · Score: 2
      I have one of those Gateway Anykey-124 Programmable keyboards and they rock. I wish I had this keyboard at work on my Sun. No one I've seen makes a keyboard like this anymore:

      Drifting slightly off topic, but geeks like their keyboards to do stuff instead of resorting to rodents, right? Cherry do some pretty cool keyboards for geeks, but the one I've linked to is the one I intend to replace my Gateway 124 with.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    11. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      DIN-5 was too big, realistically. You save a rather large bit of space by using a DIN-9 instead. This makes a huge difference in places where space is at a particular premium - notebooks and super-small form factor PCs.

      For the same matter USB uses less space than even DIN-9.

      I do want to smack IBM for (amongst many things regarding the PC) making the mouse and keyboard connector identical. At least they've been putting them in the same place relative to each other for the past few years.

      Now if the damn sound jacks would have meaningful, readable-while-under-the-desk labels so you don't jack the speakers into the wrong port.

    12. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by camt · · Score: 1

      I hate you! I had one of those awesome keyboards a long time ago, but it has since failed. I have beet stuck using my wireless Logitech one over since since last I checked Gateway does not make those keyboards. It was by FAR the cheapest hardware based macro keyboard on the market. Good tactile response too. Can I buy yours? =D

    13. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by Arandir · · Score: 1

      I don't need more buttons. Use the three button Trackman and you see why. It fits the human hand perfectly (no snickers from the peanut gallery!)

      The thumb rests on the trackball, where you have fine control, and each button is squarely situation under the natural position of the first three fingers. If it had so many buttons that I had to move a finger then that's too many buttons.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    14. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by smyle · · Score: 1
      My printer is pretty crummy, but it has this great ability to turn text into physical paper, which is all I need.

      I have one of those, too. It's a Smith-Corona and even has a built-in whiteout tape dispenser.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    15. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by smyle · · Score: 1
      ... that can only be programmed with Windows drivers to do nothing more fancy than open up IE or Outlook.

      I'm using one of those now. While I rarely use any of the other buttons, having a 'Mute' button on the keyboard is very nice when the phone rings.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    16. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by smyle · · Score: 1

      I've got a Focus 9001 at home I'm not using (which IIRC is the same thing). The calculator LCD is broke, but AFAIK the keyboard macros still work. It's just collecting dust now, but if you want it, e-mail me (seriously).

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

  55. Buy a hub by DeadBugs · · Score: 2

    "I wish it had even more built-in USB ports, but six is a good start"

    Am I the only one with so many wires connected to their PC that it looks like a plate of spaghetti? 4 ports is more than enough on the computer after that I found it's better to use a hub. I have one on the other desk where my printer and scanner are and one by the keyboard for my MP3 player and Digital Camera.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  56. Re:Completely useless by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1
    making a motherboard that is virtually useless to anybody who isn't bleeding edge. I don't even have a single USB device, and I still use ISA cards

    Oh Yes, USB and PCI are so "bleeding edge".

  57. Hm.. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    They say, that three PCI slots will be enough because all that stuff is onboard....okay. But, until the onboard 5.1 sound, and ethernet is everybit as good as what i get from my Soundblaster Live or 3Com NIC, I will continue to use those instead of onboard solutions. the support for so many USB and IDE devices is nice though

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  58. Perhaps market is ready. by moankey · · Score: 1

    Funny thing is Apple, of all companies, are always ahead of their time. They come out with a great idea but too radical for most people to accept. After about 1/2 a decade later its is mimicked and is wildly successful.

    One thing I am glad never took off was that whole translucent thing, I think I was the only one that thought it was annoyingly ugly.

  59. Re:Completely useless by underactive · · Score: 2, Funny

    ISA??! hey, the 1980's called... it wants its computer back. :-P

    --
    my other computer is your Windows(tm) box...
  60. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • TRUE geeks know how to get X Windows working without the latest and greatest.


    • Poverty ain't the issue. It's the fact that any kid can go down to the local store and buy the latest shit every week. That's fucking lame. Get an old box working well, and that's fucking cool.
    yeah, but why? If i don't need to make something work on old hard-ware (say, due to poverty), why cause myself extra headaches? Is it so I can lord it over other people about how L33T i am? That's fucking lame.
  61. Re:Completely useless by Grax · · Score: 1

    True geeks with money to burn have every computer they ever bought still operational and networked and they have the latest and greatest which they've hacked to be overclocked except that it requires the refrigeration unit from an old frigidaire to keep it cool.

    Actually, true geekdom isn't based on what hardware or software you have. It is what you do with it that counts.

  62. Re:Completely useless by ttyRazor · · Score: 1

    what rock have you been living under? The only reason ISA cards ae cheap is because they're OLD, and there's just as many cheap PCI cards floating around too. Probably even fewer, since there hasn't been a retail pc made with ISA slots in 2 or 3 years. Unless you consider minimum wage wealthy, I don't think you'll go broke on $12 sound cards and 100Mbps nics.

  63. Re:Completely useless by linzeal · · Score: 2
    Hahaha, lol.

    Mod parent up you wankers

  64. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bull.
    First off, my older machines don't need a keyboard and mouse, I run them remotly.
    second:
    Please tell me where I can gt a good 101 USB keyboards? something with a metal base that I can type on for 15+years? I am using the same keyboarsd, right now, that I was using 15 years ago.
    PLease stop telling people what they can afford, it is real annoying

  65. Re:USB Keyboard vs. clicky goodness by timothy · · Score: 1

    This is one of the things I like best about PS/2 ports -- my collection of decent, sturdy, clicky keyboards.

    However, there are USB PS/2 adapters; I don't have one for the PC yet, but since I've recently acquired a machine with no PS/2 ports, I guess I need one. My iMate though lets my clicky ADB northgate keyboard work great with my iBook and other modern Macs. And there are a few nice clickies made for USB, but probably nowadays all are 104 key.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  66. Are there motherboards with firewire onboard? by HarryLLee · · Score: 1

    I know this usb2 is supposed to do the same thing, but I'm invested in firewire devices.

    1. Re:Are there motherboards with firewire onboard? by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      This motherboard has firewire also.

  67. Why not W98? by ThePlague · · Score: 0

    Ok, maybe I missed it, but what about this board precludes 98? The USB 2.0 and Firewire?

  68. Re:Beware a gimmick... but Abit does some good stu by highcaffeine · · Score: 1
    As for 12 IDE devices anyone know of a case that can cram that much into it?!

    The two boxes sitting underneath the networking equipment in our network/server closet here at work. Sure, they're more expensive cube cases, but one actually has twelve drives in it. Linux and software RAID turns them in a great half terabyte (non-mission-critical) fileserver for the office.

  69. Re:Completely useless by un4given · · Score: 1

    TRUE geeks know how to get X Windows working without the latest and greatest.

    Actually, TRUE geeks know that it's not called X Windows...

  70. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goddammit! It's about time that someone stood up for the little geek! I'm tired of sitting at home for days, waiting for my 'make buildworld' to finish on my '386/25 with the Seagate 20MB RLL drive as the glow of my amber screen slowly flickers as it spits out the Slushdot webpage in Lynx via the full-length Hercules Graphics card. Ahhh, the good ole' days.

    This poster's name secretly replaced with Folgers Crystals

  71. No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 2

    Excuse me, but not having PS/2 keyboard/mouse ports is totally ridiculous: come on, I have a great old keyboard (first-gen MS natural, with the 'bigger' keys) that works perfectly and is not manifactured anymore and a great Logi mouse (forget the model, not manifactured anymore either) and I would have to throw them away just to use this M/B? No way!

    And let's not even talk about my laserjet printer (which works *great* but is, obviously, parallel).

    And what's the deal with no gameport connector (for MIDI)? Why should I pay twice for the onboard sound and for a creative card to hook up my MIDI gear? Not to mention some people that have hundreds of $$ invested in non-USB HOTAS setups.

    I don't like backwards compatibility at all costs, and I like the idea of having some firewire ports and some extra USB ones (even if IMHO USB hubs are a much better idea, I can connect/disconnect things on my desk instead of having to crawl behind the computer) but removing things like keyboard/mouse connectors and parallel ports goes really too far.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by X-Dopple · · Score: 1

      My Shuttle HOT-591P motherboard, which I got back in 1998, had no PS/2 slots. Instead, I was given an AT port and a serial port.

      I don't understand - why are PS/2 ports labeled as "legacy"? They do their job well enough - a fast typist will hardly tax a PS/2 port, PS/2 keyboards have been the standard since, oh, AT keyboards went out of style. PS/2 keyboards will also work in any OS as opposed to a USB keyboard (unless your BIOS has an option for 'legacy USB keyboard' support). Finally, the IBM Model M keyboard (that old clicky keyboard that's built like a tank) is made only for PS/2, which is a reason Apples are inferior :)

      Is it because of consumer idiocy? "Too many ports"? What?

      I will not upgrade to a SoundBlaster Audigy. Creative just dropped any incentive for me to upgrade by eliminating the game/MIDI port on the back of their card.

      Parallel ports can be faster than USB in some cases - my Micro Solutions 4x CD-RW is designed for a parallel port. In one mode, USB transfers SLOWER than an ECP/EPP parallel port does!

    2. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by curunir · · Score: 5, Interesting

      why are PS/2 ports labeled as "legacy"?

      Because USB does everything PS/2 does in a more flexable way. It's nice to be able to hook the mouse into my keyboard or the back of the computer or even into a USB hub. Computer makers like USB because it eliminates the need to color-code everything. With PS/2, the tech on the phone always has to think, "did this moron hook the keyboard into the mouse port?"

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    3. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by neafevoc · · Score: 1

      I will not upgrade to a SoundBlaster Audigy. Creative just dropped any incentive for me to upgrade by eliminating the game/MIDI port on the back of their card.

      I have an Audigy (EX to be exact). You're right, there is no Game/MIDI port on the back of their card. Instead, you use a dongle to get to the Game port.

      Of course, that's how my EX is (from Audigy to daughter card to box which also has the Game port).

    4. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by Kishar · · Score: 1

      I would suspect that PS/2 is being labeled as legacy because of what USB was supposed to be ... namely, Universal. It takes manufacturers to make moves like this one for legacy devices to go away. c.f. ISA, AT, etc.

    5. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of those things called Port Replicators? They are definitely the future. I picked one up but never used it, it gave you serial, parallel, PS/2 mouse, PS/2 keyboard, and more USB all from one USB port. Port replicators: USB hubs on stereoids.

    6. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was under the impression that a PS/2 keyboard/mouse uses less CPU cycles than a USB keyboard/mouse

    7. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      creative didn't do away with the midi port, it's an option now, simply a pin header on the card, not taking up any more of that valueable back panel space. it's all taken care of buddy, believe me, i am a proud owner of an sb audigy(best thing that ever happened to me).

    8. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you heard of those things called Port Replicators?

      Isn't that what Jesus was? A Port replicator? Get it? Port - it's a type of wine? Oh Jesus, you people are so slow.

      Thank you, I'll be here all week

    9. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by neonstz · · Score: 1
      With PS/2, the tech on the phone always has to think, "did this moron hook the keyboard into the mouse port?"

      I actually spent several days with just this problem. I had to install some software to 3 PC's sitting in a 19" rack with monitors, mice and keyboards placed a few meters away. The cables where hidden in the wall. For some reason I managed to switch the mouse and keyboard on one of the machines. The result was that Windows 2000 wouldn't boot. I thought it maybe had something to do with IDE-stuff and loading the boot sector, so I tried to change the bios settings and stuff like that. I even tried to install Windows 2000 from scratch (booting off the CDROM), but the installer stopped (I can't remember when, but I think it was before it copied data do the disk). The funny thing is that the keyboard worked fine in the BIOS, but not in Windows 2000.

    10. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked at a new computer (awesome parts - it cost over $2000, had the fastest xp cpu 2100+ on the market, a motherboard released last week, 1 gig or so of memory, 2 of 80gb seagate barracudas in a raid 0 configuration...one sweet machine) with an Audigy and there is a MIDI port, AT-style (DIN) on the Audigy drive. What's the problem?

    11. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by addaon · · Score: 2

      That's actually rather interesting. I accidentally plugged in everything backwards a few days ago (also a rack environment), and everything started up fine. When I noticed, several days later, the reversal, I went and checked the documentation... apparently the HP BIOS detects which port is being used for the mouse, and assigns the other to the keyboard, so you can do it either way. I can't imagine that the hardware to do this is too expensive, so I'm surprised more companies don't do it.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    12. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      With PS/2, the tech on the phone always has to think, "did this moron hook the keyboard into the mouse port?"

      I work tech support. I strongly disagree with this statement. We almost never get calls on PS/2 hardware unless the hardware is physically broken.

      USB, on the other hand, has produced no end of nightmares with FUBAR'd drivers and inexplicable compatability glitches.

      PS/2 is "legacy" all right, where legacy = mature. USB keyboards especially are a disaster waiting to happen. A PS/2 keyboard will just work, no matter what, even if the majority of the system gets hosed. USB requires too much high level OS support and gets knocked out *far* too easily to be truly reliable. Maybe someday, but it just isn't very mature technology yet, comparitively speaking.

    13. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are ps/2 to usb converters.

    14. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      are you sure?
      on my motherboard (abit BH6) I can plug the keyboard on the "color coded" ps/2 mouse connector, and the mouse on the ps/2 keyboard connector, and it works just fine...

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  72. mahgod! 12 ide channels! by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    Does anyone have a mirror of the article or even some photos of this board, the review seems to be slashdotted already. I can't wait to see how they managed to cram *12* ide connectors on the mobo! But very cool all the same. Funny thing about IDE, does anyone even use the lame-o "slave" drive on each chain? With all of the controllers/connectors on modern boards, I don't know anyone that doesn't just have a single "master" drive on each channel.

    Thankfully I work with FibreChannel and SCSI at work... but with 12 IDE channels on a single board, I think I could "suffer" with IDE!!!! Schweet!

    1. Re:mahgod! 12 ide channels! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There ARE NOT 12 IDE CONNECTORS.

      It supports 12 IDE devices. That means 6 channels, two devices per channel.

    2. Re:mahgod! 12 ide channels! by Kishar · · Score: 1

      12 devices (max) == 6 channels.

  73. Linux? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can anyone guess how successful a Linux installation would be on such a motherboard? (Without even a PS/2 keyboard port, I'm wondering if the RedHat installer would even talk to you, without a lot of hacking and customization.)

    Removing all legacy ports seems a bit silly, to me; it takes so little to provide serial and parallel ports, they're usually integrated into some other multi-purpose I/O chip these days anyway. Sure, don't bother to have the full port on the mother board (just hook up a ribbon cable to some pins, if you need to break out the port), and allow people to disable it. But completely removing it would limit it's utility to some folks. I picked up a little motherboard recently which had no ports mounted, but everything (VGA, serial, parallel, game, sound, etc.) could be hooked up via ribbon cable to a little breakout connector. Saved a lot of space on the motherboard, but still gave you the functionality you might need.

    (In fact, a lot of the same folks who would get excited about the built-in raid, are the same folks who still need serial ports to talk to routers and switches and stuff.)

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Linux? by Micah · · Score: 2

      I was wondering the same thing, but I'm pretty sure Red Hat's installer will use USB keyboards. IIRC a friend of mine installed 7.0 with a USB KB. And he's a Linux newbie!

      What I'm wondering about is the onboard video, sound, and ethernet. If that all works with Linux, this thing might be in my next box (of course, that could be a while, I'm still happy with my Athlon 700).

    2. Re:Linux? by jrwyant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most BIOSes (excluding recent AMD motherboards using the 760MP chipset, as their southbridge's USB 1.1 is broken) implement a USB software stack providing 'legacy' support (read: makes software think it's the old keyboard controller at the usual IO addresses/interrupt) until the OS boots loads its own USB 1.1/2.0 stack and enumerates the devices. It's one reason why the flash chips housing the "CMOS" programming keeps getting bigger: 4MB, then 8MB, ...

    3. Re:Linux? by Cyno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. Being one of those people that needs a serial port to communicate to routers and switches and servers and stuff I like my systems complete. If anything they should be expanding the number of serial ports and offering a custom connection similar to USB that splits into 4 or 8 or 16 ports. You can never have enough serial ports, even if you don't use them someone else can. But what really gets me is how they preach about cutting out the old legacy stuff and then offer both USB 1.x and 2.0. Why not just offer me 8 USB 2.0 ports? Who needs 1.x? And isn't 2.x backward compatible? This looks like its all marketting hype with no real technical thought being put behind it. I hope Abit can stick around a little while longer. I loved their overclockability and I have an older athlon motherboard that's excellent! But this new stuff makes me worry about that company. Heh, integrated a/v, when will they ever learn?

    4. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB keyboard should not be a problem - I did
      quite a few installs with USB keyboard only.
      USB,USB2.0 and firewire are supported by Linux.
      Abit releases its own Linux distro.

      Should be OK.

      Kubus

    5. Re:Linux? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      Looks like a normal Realtek Ethernet from the photos.

    6. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do a (non-interactive) kickstart install w/ another box serving NFS to it, that way you'll never have to touch the keyboard and/or mouse until the system is installed, at which time I'm sure you can hack a way...

    7. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is it possible that this is the *very* reason the board was created? Is it possible that Microsoft persuaded ABIT to create such a motherboard knowing that most Linux kernels do not natively support USB?

    8. Re:Linux? by Have+Blue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can drop legacy ports as a way of playing chicken with the hardware upgrade cycle. Apple gambled in this way when they shipped the iMac with only USB and Firewire ports; they won in that ADB, serial, and SCSI (except for the high end) devices were quickly abandoned and USB/Firewire took off. If the iMacs had been able to use legacy peripherals, USB would be dead in the water right now and Firewire would be a niche toy like fiber channel.

    9. Re:Linux? by Cardhore · · Score: 2

      FYI, Mandrake has had USB mouse & keyboard support in since 8.0 I believe, and it works better than Windows XP does. I used a USB keyboard in XP and half the time it doesn't find it, so you have to sit there unplugging and plugging the keyboard until it finds it.

    10. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      they won in that ADB, serial, and SCSI (except for the high end) devices were quickly abandoned and USB/Firewire took off.


      Yeah, that and the USB->Legacy converter market quintupled.

    11. Re:Linux? by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      Sure doesn't look like there's any onboard video in the one I'm looking at.

    12. Re:Linux? by j09824 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Removing all legacy ports seems a bit silly, to me; it takes so little to provide serial and parallel ports, they're usually integrated into some other multi-purpose I/O chip these days anyway. Sure, don't bother to have the full port on the mother board (just hook up a ribbon cable to some pins, if you need to break out the port), and allow people to disable it. But completely removing it would limit it's utility to some folks.

      I'm glad to see that stuff go. Configuration of legacy ports is a headache, and even just their presence on the motherboard is a potential pitfall. Furthermore, there is something good about making the life of people relying on them harder: it gives hardware and software vendors a reason to finally update their offerings to the new standards.

      If you really must have serial or parallel ports, USB-to-Serial and USB-to-Parallel cables work very well and are cheap.

      Can anyone guess how successful a Linux installation would be on such a motherboard? (Without even a PS/2 keyboard port, I'm wondering if the RedHat installer would even talk to you, without a lot of hacking and customization.)

      USB support is completely integrated into current Linux kernels; USB keyboards just work--there is nothing to do.

    13. Re:Linux? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      I'm glad I'm not the only one wondering why 4 serial ports isn't standard. And spaced far enough apart (or side by side) that you can use 2 25pin adapters simultaneously.

      -Paul Komarek

    14. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wait, they do

    15. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good insight on the 8 USB 2.0s there..I was wondering the same thing. If I understand correctly, USB 2 is provided on a separate chip while USB 1.0 comes from the KT333 chipset..it was there, so they might as well use it.

    16. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's why you boot up with it plugged in

    17. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's why USB is useless, because its exactly the same as it's PS/2 counterpart: doesn't hotplug well.

    18. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redhat installer works fine with usb only
      As with the rescue mode

      Mandrake installer works fine with usb only
      had troubles with rescue mode though.

      Gentoo installer works fine with usb only
      Rescue mode is fine as well, cause that is the installer :)

      From now on, im going to be using the Gentoo install disk as my rescue disk. Since it supports USB no troubles, and also supports XFS.

    19. Re:Linux? by fishebulb · · Score: 2

      ive had luck with hotplugging nonrequired deviced (webcam, visor) never tried keyboards and mice though.

    20. Re:Linux? by Wolfier · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This kind of motherboard is ideal, for OEM to make "iMac-like" "user-friendly" computers, and there is no doubt the market for this kind of motherboard will be huge. Think "set-top boxes with sealed cases".

      And...a lot of (say, more than 50% for sure) people prefer these treat-you-as-an-idiot style computers - because they ARE idiot, with respect to computers.

      I believe Abit will continue to make excellent motherboards for the rest of us. I won't be worrying too much.

    21. Re:Linux? by bzzzt · · Score: 1

      Can anyone guess how successful a Linux installation would be on such a motherboard? (Without even a PS/2 keyboard port, I'm wondering if the RedHat installer would even talk to you, without a lot of hacking and customization.)

      Red Hat Linux supports USB keyboards/mice since 7.0, so for at least a year. This includes the installer.

    22. Re:Linux? by jsoderba · · Score: 1

      There's no integrated video that I can see. On the other hand the onboard audio is deifinately weak. The C-Media chip a lot of other motherboards use is much better. Still, with optical out for the audio freaks and 5.1 analog to push most people's crappy "multimedia" speakers I guess it's satisfactory.

      It's not like this is their only KT333 board, anyway. If this doesn't fit your requirements, buy another model.

    23. Re:Linux? by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      If you really must have serial or parallel ports, USB-to-Serial and USB-to-Parallel cables work very well and are cheap.

      I've been wondering about these... how do they work? Do you connect it up and have a driver that intercepts all traffic to COMx and redirects it to the USB port?

      How well do they work? (Yes, I know, you said "very well" - but really, have you run into software that expects to talk to a serial port and won't work with a serialUSB connector?)

      Seriously hoping for a reply here. I have some software that doesn't like the serial ports on a couple boxes of mine, so if it'd connect to USB I'd be happier.

    24. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone guess how successful a Linux installation would be on such a motherboard? (Without even a PS/2 keyboard port, I'm wondering if the RedHat installer would even talk to you, without a lot of hacking and customization.)

      I believe the BIOS takes care of USB keyboards. Yesterday, when I was setting up a new refurbished computer, I had to enable USB keyboards in the BIOS.

      My old computer was a Gateway Flex ATX motherboard (*shudder*). It didn't have any PS/2 ports and came with 5 USB ports. The USB ports worked fine... The only thing with it was that either there was an air circulation problem (the case is very, very small) or there was a power supply problem, but components were failing left and right. Another thing that I didn't like about was that no decent PCI card would fit in it. That was just depressing.

      So my suggestion is, watch out for the quirks of the new ones, and sometimes they're not that different when compared with the old systems, unless it addresses some specific capabilities that you want.

    25. Re:Linux? by realnowhereman · · Score: 1

      I think you are about five years out of date. Exactly which "headache" are you talking about for configuring serial and parallel ports on a modern PC? The problems that seem to occur most as far as causing headaches is concerned is playing musical chairs with PCI cards until you get the configuration that works.

      I think the main benefit to throwing away these legacy ports will be to free up the four IRQs that are being gobbled up by serial/parallel/mouse and keyboard.

      I personally will be sad to see the serial ports go - I like my old and trusted RS232 connections. However, I can still buy PCI cards to supply them if I want them so roll on the revolution I say.

      The thing that worries me about USB connections primarily is that the higher bandwidth will be used as an excuse by modem manufacturers to make all the modems software - internal and external.

      --
      Carpe Daemon
    26. Re:Linux? by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      SuSE had no problem with my USB keyboard and mouse. I was suprised at that, actually, since the keyboard is an SGI and I had a hard time getting it to work in Windows.

      The one downside That I've noticed is that when KDE locks up I lose keyboard functionality, which forces me to hit the reset button instead of just killing X. Generally it's not that big of a deal, since (a) I'm rarely do anything with my computer that's actually important, and (b) I use reiserfs, but it does take some time to reboot and that's kind of annoying.

      I suspect I could probably fix it by compiling a kernel with USB not a module, but I seem to be bad at compiling kernels. I've only ever compiled one that worked, and it had support for basically nothing.

      Yes, I know it's not that hard. I don't know what's wrong with me...

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  74. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > am using the same keyboarsd, right now, that I > was using 15 years ago.
    heh - you can tell by all the typographical errors....

  75. The venerable Mac by cluening · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know, Apple got rid of legacy ports a loooooong time ago (at least in computer-time). Of course, I am still a fan of legacy ports (where would all of my cool old hardware plug in?), but this doesn't seem groundbreaking on the grand scheme of things. Heck, Sun even went all USB on their SunRay appliances. Yeah, they aren't "real computers" but still. But, alas, the world is dominated by "innovation" from Intel and Micros~1, so until they do it, it hasn't been done. (like the "first optical mouse" that Micros~1 came up with a couple years ago - what do you call the optical Sun mouse I have that has "1992" stamped on the bottom of it?)

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
    1. Re:The venerable Mac by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

      "what do you call the optical Sun mouse I have that has "1992" stamped on the bottom of it?"

      I have one of those.. it requires a special mousepad to be used with it, and will only work on that mouse pad and nothing else. The MS optical mouse works on that, a normal mouse pad, a desk, your face, the cat, whatever you want. They are similar, but they are not the same. The MS optical mouse is much more useful and works better.

    2. Re:The venerable Mac by cluening · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you draw little dots on a piece of paper, it will kind of work on that too. :)

      --
      Posted from the wireless couch.
    3. Re:The venerable Mac by JFTaylor · · Score: 1

      There's even one older than that for Amigas called the Boing! optical mouse. It was neat for it's time, but it required a special mousepad too. Still, it was the ultimate in cool attached to your new A2000. :)

      --
      ---- James
    4. Re:The venerable Mac by El_Nofx · · Score: 1

      I don't know why pc makers don't follow and ditch legacy. I mean how long has the serial port been around? 15 years?

      I have a USB hub at home, that has two serial ports, one parallel port and 4 usb ports on it. I could use it to hook up to a new machine if I need legacy stuff, it only cost 40 bucks too. You can hook that right into a USB 2.0 port and have all your legacy needs taken care of.

      I like this mobo having both firewire and usb 2.0 though. Nifty stuff. I have had nothing but good luck with abit. I highly recommend the dual processor VP6, it works great. Add dual p3's to it, about a gig of ram and a strip set and you've got a really friggin fast machine.

      --
      It's not the OS it's the user that sucks. If it's user friendly, you get stupider people. - clinko
    5. Re:The venerable Mac by BeagleBoi · · Score: 1

      I call it a piece of shit, assuming it's one of those optical mice that require a special mousepad with little lines drawn on it. They're incredibly annoying to use, particularly when the mousepad angle changes.

      On the other hand, I admit that the idea of having a mousepad with the lines drawn logarithmically was pretty cool...

    6. Re:The venerable Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Sun Optical mouse requires that special mousepad, right? The MS (and Logitech) Optical mouse works on just about anything with a modicum of texture (desktop, couch armrest, pant leg, cat, etc).

    7. Re:The venerable Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I mean how long has the serial port been around? 15 years?"

      Longer than that. RS-232 has been around since the 1960s. Which in my book is an argument for keeping it -- it's the one comm standard that's never significantly changed.

    8. Re:The venerable Mac by 0x20 · · Score: 1

      Apple also provided their own USB keyboard and mouse and an OS that was completely compatible with their new port scheme. They're playing on a different field. They could make a computer that only accepts software written by gold pen on tree bark and call it "innovative" instead of "deviant."

  76. Re:Completely useless by digitalunity · · Score: 2

    That's completely asinine. If you are running a mobo with that poor of a design, maybe you need to start spending more money on your PC parts. Most boards will let you turn off integrated components AND reclaim their reserved interupts. I'm running an older Abit with a KT133A and a built-in HighPoint 100 Raid controller. I don't need the built-in raid functions so I disabled it. I have no problems using other cards on the interrupts, as I have the ability to manually select what each IRQ and DMA is allocated to. That's a good design. It's also rock solid, only crashes when I do something retarded like boot up Win98 :-0

    One thing you are right about, built-in components cost a lot of money. More than just 5 or 10 dollars. Look at high end dual proc boards; many times the only difference between them is a nice builting SCSI raid card and $100.

    USB doesn't suck, it's more flexible. It just requires more software support and it seems the Linux USB support isn't quite *there* yet.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  77. When Apple did this, they laughed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... when ABIT did it, they gave it a score of "98%".

    That said, I do want to point out a few things. While there are 10 USB ports, **many, many** more USB devices may be used per channel if you plug in some external USB hubs.

    Also worth noting, the board only has 3 PCI (vanilla 33 MHz, 32 bit) slots, though you do already get a lot of stuff onboard.

    IDE is provided via four "raid" channels and two "plain" channels. If you use a slave device on each channel, you can have up to ten IDE devices, but performance will suck. Fill up the onboard IDE slots and then invest in a nice IDE raid card when your needs grow. In my ancient PC I already have a 12x DVD-ROM, 24x CD-ROM (each on its own channel, "slave" sucks). Plus a stripe of two 80 GB 5400 RPM drives (storage) and a srtipe of two 60 GB 7400 ROM drives (boot/main).

    1. Re:When Apple did this, they laughed... by xdfgf · · Score: 0

      "Also worth noting, the board only has 3 PCI (vanilla 33 MHz, 32 bit) slots, though you do already get a lot of stuff onboard."

      This isn't a troll. Sort of offtopic though.

      What kind of devices use the 64bit slots?

    2. Re:When Apple did this, they laughed... by green+pizza · · Score: 2

      What kind of devices use the 64bit slots?

      64 bit is very handy when more than one PCI slot is sharing a PCI bus... most PC and Mac mobos only have one PCI bus, shared by 3-5 slots. GigE NICs, SCSI cards, lab/data acquisition boards, uncompressed HD video interface cards, etc... most high end, high-thruput PCI cards have 64-bit and/or 66 MHz options to take advantage of wider (64-bit) or faster (66 MHz) busses. Heard the buzz about PCI-X? Just a fancy name for 64-bit, 133 MHz PCI that's starting to become popular on server boards.

    3. Re:When Apple did this, they laughed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't 64-bit 133MHz PCI necessary for effective GigE?

  78. Apple has been doing this for yeats? by Dokushoka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this innovative when apple has been including all this stuff in their mobos for quite a while now?

    1. Re:Apple has been doing this for yeats? by msm1th · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but W.B. Yeats died in 1939, a few years before USB was invented.

    2. Re:Apple has been doing this for yeats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt. Sorry, I've never seen a Mac with 12 IDE channels. :P

    3. Re:Apple has been doing this for yeats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* Clueless.

      You need to get into the same mindset as the genious who thought up the one-click patent. Get with the program! Become enlightened.

      The innovative idea isn't having these ports. The innovation is having these ports and a x86 processor in the same product.

      Once you understand that, you'll realize why Windows 95's start button was innovative, why the look of its widgets was innovative, and why ATX machines being able to power themselves down is innovative.

      Hope this helps.

    4. Re:Apple has been doing this for yeats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that Apple includes gigabit ethernet on half the product line, and untill these PC motherboards ship with slots for 802.11b cards I will never own one, why should I waste one of those three PCI clots on a wireless card when i can get a mac with 4 PCI slots and not have to use one for it.

  79. your board by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

    the board you picked up with no ports and ribbion options. where did you get whats its name and how much

    1. Re:your board by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2
      the board you picked up with no ports and ribbion options. where did you get whats its name and how much
      It was actually sold as an upgrade card by PowerLeap, but it's an upgrade card that requires you disconnect power from your motherboard; the motherboard becomes just a holder for the new single board computer, in effect.

      So their reasoning for having the jumpered-out ports is a little different; so you can plumb in the upgrade card to an old PC. But the effect is good for those who choose to use it as a single board computer :-)

      The unit is pretty amazing; it has 3D graphics, sound, up to 1G memory, 1ghz procsesor, sound, game port, three serial, parallel, PS/2 mouse & keyboard, *four* USB, dual IDE, and probably some other goodies I'm forgetting. All on a PCI card sized unit.

      The pricing was very good; check out powerleap's store for details. (Mine was the 370S.)

      (Mine actually came with a broken CPU fan, but they assure me a new one is en-route.) I'll probably do up a review for /. once I get Linux fired up on it (and make a new newsworthy custom case for it; let's see, maybe popsicle sticks...)
      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  80. honestly... by greymond · · Score: 1

    for me to consider a new motherboard "innovative" it would have 1 1.1 usb and 1 2.0 usb (you can get hubs to extend them if needed) then it would have 68 and 80 pin scsi controllers on it (1 each) forget ide all together - then 1 firewire port - it would have the latest nvidia chipset or ari chipset card with all the extra connections on the board as well as the dlink 100/1ghz ethernet card onboard. it would also include a creative labs card onboard with all the rca and audio jacks available - then THAT would be the board of the future

    1. Re:honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, a board of your description would make me sit up and take notice. That would be an awesome board
      The Abit usb/ide board on the other hand is geared to the Best Buy bottom feeders. It is what they consider a hot MB.

  81. The REAL Hot Motherboard by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    While this looks nice in a sort of consumer way, I won't be buying one of these. 1 CPU, 4 memory slots and 3 PCI slots are about 1/2 of what I want for each of these key expansion busses.

    Instead, give me something like THIS.

  82. ... twelve ide devices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's that "new math".

    12 IDE devices total if lame-o "slave" devices are used.

    Slave devices are fine on Grandma's PII/400, but not on my God Box.

  83. Re:Completely useless by geekoid · · Score: 2

    no.
    A true geek plays quake, buys clothing from think geek, hangs out at /. and rant about MPAA while running out to watch LOTR.
    What you are sir, is a nerd.
    be proud, you actually know something about technology.

    It's sad that the term geek has lost all meaning, but thats what happens when something becomes "hip"

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  84. Re:Completely useless by geekoid · · Score: 2

    haha, you got me there. but believe me, my spelling would not improve with a new keyboard.
    I had to re-learn how to talk when I was 6, that screwed up my spelling forever.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  85. Remote administration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without serial ports are there any easy/cheap ways to remotely administrate this box via the Linux console?

  86. What about the case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they sell cases that can handle that many drives?

    SCSI has its downsides, but it's easier to hook up lots of drives because the SCSI world tends to support external drives better.

    1. Re:What about the case? by bravehamster · · Score: 1
      They have mid-size cases now that have 11 bays. Here's one. Almost all full size cases, like this one have 11 bays also. With that many drives, though, you'll want to get a larger pwr supply, like maybe 550W.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    2. Re:What about the case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better bet would be to buy one of the Chenbro cases at newegg. $155 w/o PS, can take 2 PS's in it, a nice double wide. We have one at work, it does duty as a mass CD reader. Not a bad case at all.

      http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduct.asp?submit =m anufactory&catalog=9&manufactory=1447&DEPA=1

  87. firewire TV card by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    Now if they would only make a firewire (HD)TV tuner card...

  88. Re:I think they're smoking ABIT of crack over ther by Bake · · Score: 2

    Well, us Linux folks had their usb mouse detected during their last installation of RedHat 7.2, so quit yer complaining get a newer kernel.
    Hell, I was even using a usb mouse _before_ the 2.4 series.

  89. No ps2 ports - for the love of god.... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

    I can almost see dropping a floppy drive, but a ps2 keyboard and mouse? I use a USB keyboard and mouse on my laptop, but it does take a fair bit more CPU cycles to use the USB version over the ps2. Mind you, a few seconds longer to boot weblogic is not a huge deal, but like those silly winmodems - why waste it on something like a keyboard and mouse? It is not like this board is headed for "almost embedded" solutions like the 170mmx170mm mainboards I plan to toss in my car.

  90. Re:Completely useless by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2

    Actually, true geeks photomask and etch their own silicon. Careful with the HF, now.

  91. Don't forget SCSI Ultra320 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the SCSI Ultra320 bus. That's 320 MB/s!! I think IDE maxes out at 40MB/s and the bus is shared so that's 40MB/s for all devices. SCSI kicks IDE's ass, no doubt about it.

    1. Re:Don't forget SCSI Ultra320 by jrwyant · · Score: 1

      For ATA133, writes can stream off of one drive at 133MB/s (if the chipset can support that...), with two drives you must time-division multiplex that (with significant CPU overhead, well, significant in relationship to the data transferred), but writes max out at around 88MB/s. (ATA100 and beyond were marketing ploys, as they're talking about reads only at that point.) The real issue is this: SCSI hosts and drives support tagged-command queuing, which ATA controllers/drives do not (generally.) That, coupled with CPU controlling overhead, and the low number of drives you can connect per controller, and the few types of devices supported, is what tends to sink ATA when compared to SCSI... :)

  92. Guess the posts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    50 percent will say "I am not throwing out my old hardware!!!"
    20 percent will say "Use a USB hub fool!"
    15 percent will say "There's not enough PCI slots"
    10 percent will say that Apple already does this.
    5 percent will say that Abit are smoking crack.

    you ppl r so predicatable

    1. Re:Guess the posts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well said. i was going to do a similar post but you beat me too it. good job.

    2. Re:Guess the posts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sure seems easy to predict after 100 posts have been etched in stone.

    3. Re:Guess the posts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u is l33t, eh mon?

    4. Re:Guess the posts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you of course you "predicted" this after reading 100 posts previous to yours, right?

      What's wrong with those issues you mentioned? Criticism like that keeps stuff balanced and flowing; who the hell are you, Mao?

  93. Translucent DID take off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The colored, translucent plastics of the iMac touched off (or added a lot of fire to) a design trend not only among other computer and electronics manufacturers but among all kinds of consumer products. I saw waste baskets, vacuum cleaners, even ceiling fans with colored translucent plastic pieces.

    So it certainly did take off, but like any other fashion trend, it eventually ended. Apple's current fashion is milky white plastic opposite grey or metallic parts, usually with a little clear plastic trim. I'm not sure if anyone else is copying this latest Apple fashion, though.

  94. this board isn't that good by smallblackdog · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's only got 3 PCI. Granted a whole heap of the hardware is integrated but there is more in life than sound, ethernet, firewire and USB. Wheres the AGP? This renders the card almost void for a whole host of people. USB? I don't think I'm the only one but I fucking hate it. It's so so so slow and still fairly incompatible with Linux. Linux, yeh, whats the word of compatibility with this board? The article says its only for Windows (excluding 98). SCSI. Why didn't they use that. Mmmm, It's like people took one look at it and ejaculated all over their pants. This board looks pretty much redundant. The page was /.ed before I read anything further than page 1 so some of my ramblings may be false. 'Just my two bits worth, worth'

    --
    Mod me down, fine with me, it's my real karma I try to keep up.
    1. Re:this board isn't that good by smallblackdog · · Score: 0

      my bad, it does have AGP (didn't see it on first view) but still, the other points stand.

      --
      Mod me down, fine with me, it's my real karma I try to keep up.
    2. Re:this board isn't that good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use USB in Linux just fine. What kernel are you using? How do you have it configured?

      USB HID (keyboard/mouse/joystick), USB mass storage (also used in many digicams), USB imaging devices, it's all there...

      Add devfs to the equation, and you're in heaven.

    3. Re:this board isn't that good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB Optical IntelliMouse Microsoft and USB Natural Keyboard of Microsoft work on my box..what's this FUD about "It's so so so slow and still fairly incompatible with Linux. " Sure 12Mbps is slow but USB2 is 480Mbps.

    4. Re:this board isn't that good by smallblackdog · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that USB 2.0 had 480Mbps bandwidth. Thats a darn site better than 12. I'm usin Mandrake 8.2. My USB printer and Mouse work but for the life of me I can't get my Alcatel Speedtouch USB modem to work in it. Any ideas?

      --
      Mod me down, fine with me, it's my real karma I try to keep up.
  95. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The floppy drive on most modern PCs uses DMA channel 6.

  96. No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by n6mod · · Score: 2

    This is really disappointing. Just when I thought I found the right board to replace the P2B-LS in my HTPC. But...

    Bzzzrt.

    I still need more than 3PCI slots, even with the cool I/O on this mobo.

    I need:
    HiPix Card (HD Tuner Card)
    Gig Ethernet (You try shuffling 16GB movies in HD around)
    SCSI (DDS-4 for offline storage of said HD movies)

    And it's full. No possibility of adding the next cool thing. I'd have to use an AIW if I wanted to use dScaler for DVDs, etc. etc.

    Seems like omitting SCSI and GigE were severe oversights.

    -Z

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    1. Re:No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because SCSI and gigabit ethernet are real consumer products.

    2. Re:No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Easy dont buy this motherboard. This motherboard has most of the stuff a home user would need online. But 3 PCI would be pushing it, but Since my 2 of my 3 PCI cards are Ethernet and Audio (SB Audigy), it does make sense.

    3. Re:No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by n6mod · · Score: 2

      SCSI is debatable in the consumer space, I agree.

      But the argument that 1000BaseTX isn't a consumer product is entirely specious. Macs have GigE, and they're always dissed as "consumer" machines around here.

      D-Link 1000BaseTX NIC's are $40 off the shelf. There's no good reason not to use a Gig chipset anymore.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    4. Re:No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the capability for 12 IDE devices is geared towards the average consumer.

    5. Re:No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, buy a Mac, get 4 PCI slots, and then yopu won't even have to use one for the gigabit, that would leave you with 2 spare slots, and you won't have to waste one on a wireless card.

    6. Re:No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by n6mod · · Score: 2

      I'd love to use the Mac, since that's where the rest of my video tools are hosted, but there's no driver support for any HDTV tuner that I know of.

      If you know of one, I'd love to know about it.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
  97. w00t!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As meatloaf sort of said, 1 out of 3 aint bad.

  98. MAX? by Zod000 · · Score: 1

    I find it rather amusing that this board is dubbed the Abit MAX when it seems to be lacking so much. SO say I order this wonderful new motherboard only to find that I have to replace my mouse, keyboard, printer and scanner or I can go buy the entire rack of USB adapters. No thanks Abit.

    --
    People seem much brighter once you light them on fire.
    1. Re:MAX? by soulflakes · · Score: 0

      Yeah!! Who needs fuel injection, power brakes or automatic transmissions for that matter?? Hell...who needs computers...we should have stuck with typewriters!!!

      PS/2 ports RULE!!

      Please! This board is not being targeted for use in servers. Like it or not, USB and Firewire are here to stay. Serial, parallel, ISA, token ring and coax networks are a thing of the past fellow geeks...deal with it now.

    2. Re:MAX? by Datafage · · Score: 1

      No board will make everyone happy, if you have all those old peripherals you're not on the cutting edge anyway, and the board isn't aimed at you, there are plenty of others to choose from. This is what I've been dreaming of.

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

  99. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then find me a "dirt cheap" wireless keyboard with
    integrated pointing device. The one I have now
    uses serial port and PS/2; they don't make it anymore! >:(

  100. Re:Completely useless by virtual_mps · · Score: 1

    Well, if you really really really can't live without your museum piece you could buy a ps2 to usb converter.

  101. More ports! More ports! by fm6 · · Score: 2
    I agree that this board seems to make a fetish of overkill. But you're not thinking things through when you assume that hubs are always a good substitute for ports.
    • Cables are a pain. Cutting back on them is a key USB feature. Hubs means extra cabling, especially if you have a lot of USB-powered devices, and thus need to get powered hubs.
    • Hubs share bandwidth, they don't create it. Suppose you own a half-dozen Rio Riots and want to download them all at once? (Unlikely scenario? What else would you do with a terabyte of disk space!)
    • Some storage devices don't work with shared ports. Or rather they work, but you risk scrambling them when another device grabs the port at a crucial moment.
    • There's something called "USB conflict" where the devices screw each other up because their manufacturers skimped on USB standard compliance. Usual workaround is to rearrange who shares with who -- a lot easier to do if you have more than the usual 2 ports.
    1. Re:More ports! More ports! by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      In other words, you need more ports to fix a shoddy component. That's the beauty of firewire (no, I wouldn't use it for a mouse, maybe for a printer and scanner), you don't have to deal with SHARED bandwidth or deal with a choked CPU.

    2. Re:More ports! More ports! by Johannes · · Score: 1

      "Grabs the port"? Do you understand how USB works?

      First off, it's a host controlled bus. The bus tells every device when it can speak. I wouldn't put it past a device to broken in this regard, but just speaking randomly won't matter if the host isn't expecting it (babble).

      USB is also fully protected with CRC. While not 160 bits of md5, it goes a long way to preventing corruption of data.

      If you have a situation where data is corrupted, because of the USB bus, I'd be surprised.

    3. Re:More ports! More ports! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hubs mean accessible cable points. I'd rather have one cable behind my computer, with the hub accessible, rather than 8 USB cords congealing behing my computer because everything is plugged into the MoBo. I would also feel more secure about my powered hub than with the MoBo "hub" as far as supplying power. If it's not enough, I buy a new hub. If the mobo doesn't supply enough power...

  102. Re:Completely useless by NMSpaz · · Score: 1

    Heh, I hope for your sake you're not describing an ABIT KA7, otherwise you'll see soon enough just how stable it is... I've never heard of a single one of those boards lasting even two years... (I've had 3 that didn't make it to one)

  103. Re:Completely useless by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

    Hey, if you can make your PII 250 work as good as my Athlon 1.4, THEN maybe I have some learning to do.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  104. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True geeks manufacture their own silicon to prevent imperfections. Or have I gone too far?

  105. Re:I think they're smoking ABIT of crack over ther by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    So go write some decent USB drivers for Linux, and GPL them so the non-coder g33ks can have some fun!

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  106. USB absolutely uses DMA by Johannes · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know where you're getting your information, but all 3 common USB host controllers (UHCI, OHCI and EHCI) use bus mastering DMA to transfer the data from the device to main memory.

    Go check the USB host controller specs for yourself.

    1. Re:USB absolutely uses DMA by AmPz · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I read about the USB standard when it was introduced. they cut the prices of the required hardware by excluding complicated stuff like DMA.

  107. Re:Completely useless by gerbache · · Score: 1

    Why does everyone keep calling this thing useless? This motherboard is made for -NEW- PCs. Why do people not seem to understand this? Most of the time, when buying a new PC, you think about things like "what peripherals will I need for this?". If you don't think about this sort of thing, you shouldn't be building a PC with this type of hardware in the first place, so, holy gods, you _don't buy this motherboard_!

    I hate to sound mean here, but I hardly see how a manufacturer pushing the edge of computing can be seen in the wrong for releasing -one- product in their entire bloody lineup that doesn't cater to the needs of people who are stuck in 1995. It seems pretty simple to me; if you are building a new computer and aren't planning on using any legacy technology (I'm not, for instance), then buy this type of board. If you do need legacy support, they and practically all the other manufacturer's are -still- making boards that will work quite nicely.

    Let's hear it for companies finally ditching legacy ports and moving to the future, carried by people who buy new computers.

  108. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's right - you're talking bullshit, linux will happily support usb, and firewire.

  109. Review has a lot of marketing cruft by piranha(jpl) · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This article seems sort of biased and heavy on the marketing hype. Here are my repsonses to a few notable things written in the article.

    Windows 2000/XP/ME only. Win98 users need not apply. [page 1; image caption]

    For what reasons is Windows 98 not supported? For the same reasons as Windows 98 won't run, will {Linux,{Free,Net,Open}BSD} be affected? They do not go into any detail on this whatsoever.

    It is FINALLY time to get rid of that old Dexxa ball mouse that came with your first SVGA card. While you're at it, toss out that old Dot Matrix printer, and even the $13 keyboard with the ASDFJKL: keys completely rubbed off! Abit steps into a new era of computing with the MAX boards. [page 1]

    What's wrong with my old ball mouse? It works. Why should PS/2 keyboards and mice be replaced by USB? It seems overkill, especially for keyboards, where things should always work, even if your OS is having problems seeing your USB controller. With USB, too many things can break, and leave your system in a hard-to-fix state. (Ever added 'usb-uhci' instead of 'usb-ohci' to /etc/modules, or equivalent? Many OSs don't have USB support in the installer; Debian doesn't at least, and I don't think any of the BSDs do. Does the BIOS emulate an AT interface for USB keyboards?) More importantly, new eras of computing have little to do with shedding "legacy" devices. New eras of computing are set in software ideology and design. Even as far as hardware goes, new eras of computing would be more akin to a next generation of processor, or a new archetecture in CPUs or busses enabling more than 16 IRQ lines. That last sentence seems very marketroid.

    Despite having all the next-gen high performance capabilities, SCSI is still absent. This proves that while the AT7 is a very high end board, it is still targeted to the consumer market. Thanks, Abit! [page 1; bottom]

    The "consumer" market doesn't use 12 IDE devices. The high-end hobbyist/server/gaming markets do. I think it's a shame they left out SCSI, which seems inconsistent with trying to shed "legacy devices". SCSI is great. Why are you thanking them?

    Included are a set of nifty black IDE cables ... This is a great way to have some nice looking custom IDE cables without worrying about using rounded cables (IDE cables are flat for a reason you know!). [page 2]

    I use rounded cables (that I make myself) to improve airflow and increase the ease of routing/positioning cables inside my cases. I don't care about how they look. And no, I didn't know of a reason IDE cables are flat, besides conventional manufacturing techniques in use. Too bad you don't explain why, because the first thing I'd do with these cables is use a razor blade to slice them into segments, and bunch the segments together with zip-ties, as I would any other flat cable.

    It is expected that most cases will start using MediaXP panels, rather than their own Mickey Mouse panels you see now. [page 2; bottom]

    Uh huh. I take it these MediaXP panels are specific to Abit and their licensees. How much are you being paid by Abit again?

    Gee, it sure looks like a big gain in performance, but this is like comparing dog poo to cat poo...
    Ugh I can't bear to look at that... Let's get to the OpenGL numbers...
    [page 6; bottom]

    Comparing "dog poo to cat poo"? Maybe you meant comparing apples and oranges. "Ugh"? The reviewer seems to have come straight from the AOL chat rooms... Okay, so I say "ugh" from time to time, but you don't use that word in a written review. That's fairly unprofessional.

    One more gripe, but somewhat offtopic: at the bottom of every page, I'm told to use IE 5+ and a 1024x768x32-bit screen. There is no excuse for bad web design that depends on a specific browser configuration like this. </pissyrant>

    1. Re:Review has a lot of marketing cruft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no, I didn't know of a reason IDE cables are flat, besides conventional manufacturing techniques in use

      A lot of people say that you get less crosstalk with ribbon cables. Some say twisting pairs together seems to solve this problem. I have no experience with these so I can't say for sure.

    2. Re:Review has a lot of marketing cruft by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I didn't know of a reason IDE cables are flat

      I do. Electrical requirements such as impedance matching and sheilding.

      IDE cables alternate Data and Ground for the same reasons as SCSI. It helps ensure a clean signal across the length of the cable without reflections. If you want a round IDE cable it should use some form of twisted pair cable (or at least be separated into even amounts of wires).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:Review has a lot of marketing cruft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what reasons is Windows 98 not supported? For the same reasons as Windows 98 won't run, will {Linux,{Free,Net,Open}BSD} be affected? They do not go into any detail on this whatsoever.

      Probably all the extra IDE ports. NT (and hence, Win2k/XP) maps IDE through its SCSI interface, so doesn't really care. 98 probably goes through the DOS bios, which in theory does support up to 4 IDE channels, but most BIOS only support 2 (IDE0 and IDE1). If you get an extra IDE interface card, it probably does NOT map them through IDE2 and IDE3...at least my ABit ATA-66 card didn't (which on the computer it is in, means that the 20GB drive isn't bootable, because it doesn't have any DOS drivers for the card and the BIOS for the computer thus can't see the drive).

    4. Re:Review has a lot of marketing cruft by AmPz · · Score: 1

      Twisted pairs does not solve the problem, the signals are unbalanced.
      Twisted pair wire is for balanced signals.
      IDE cables should be left flat, that's the only way to preserve signal quality.

      Why it does not support win98... might be because at least some versions of win98 has no USB support during setup (if I remember correctly).

  110. I'd agree... by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

    That there's some kind of happy stuff ingestion going on. It's not just at ABIT though. In the review they said:

    "you are only going to get 3 PCI slots. This is because most of the peripherals that would use a PCI slot, such as the Ethernet adapter and sound card, are already onboard. Personally I've never used more than 3 PCI slots, and with this board, not a single slot it used. Yep, 3 should definitely be enough."

    WHAT?! Only three?! I have a fairly decent board, one of the Microstar KT7 Turbo Ltd boards, and I'm using all six PCI slots. Granted, most people don't have extra video cards, TV Tuners, multiple SCSI controllers, additional sound, etc, but the fact of the matter is that anyone who would actually go for the all USB approach that isn't buying it in some OEM's computer would probably skip on this one. I'll admit that the addition of the IEEE1394 and USB 2.0 is neat, but in many regards, the board is simply crippled by having no legacy ports, and no real place to add them if you actually need such.

    I'm still wondering why it's a full sized board with only the three slots. I could at least justify its existence if it were micro-ATX, for it'd be useful to then actually USB things. Right now, it's just dumb.

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
    1. Re:I'd agree... by quinto2000 · · Score: 1
      I might be wrong, but IIRC, each of those internal peripherals is actually using the PCI bus. So, there is a limit to the bus bandwidth that they are probably taking into account.


      Effectively, it's as if you have those PCI slots already taken up.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
    2. Re:I'd agree... by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

      The entire point though is that I have access to the devices. I don't expect to pound everything all at once, but I don't have to play with cheap consumer USB devices to do things that I can use slightly higher quality add-in boards for. I also don't have to worry about losing access to the devices if someone trips over the cable connecting the device to the port. I like assemblies to actually stay together.

      --

      IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
      And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
  111. Sounds like a Mac by xixax · · Score: 2

    OK, this is a neat board, (10 EIDE devices and 6 USB!) but look at what the current Mac has had for a while:

    2 x Firewire
    4 x USB (2 on the keyboard)
    4 x PCI
    Modem
    Gigabit Ether
    Audio
    Video
    (Airport) (currently optional)

    See ADB or DB25 SCSI anyywhere there?

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
    1. Re:Sounds like a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I bought my Power Mac in 1999, and I have all that you listed. It's sad how far behind the PC side is.

  112. Re:Completely useless by threephaseboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to mention that I have yet to see a 10/100-base-T ISA ethernet card that could actually compete with a PCI card, and lets not forget 1000BT..

    --
    .
  113. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are wrong. Many USB devices are already cheaper than their ISA/PCI counterparts.

    USB 802.11b Addtron card: bought for $45
    cheapest IS/PCI 802.11b card ? At least $80

    What about flash card readers ? I bought USB
    one for $25. FDD/PCI start at $60.

    USB scanner I got for $20 from staples.
    If had to use ISA with SCSI it would be more expensive.

    I bought USB Linux-compatible Ethernet cards
    for $11.

    USB is very far from bleeding edge.
    And it works quite well with Linux though.
    You just have to be carefull what you buy.
    Check http://www.qbik.ch first.

    Kubus

  114. My review... by Lithium+Element · · Score: 1
    This is the stupidest board I've seen in a while. I mean how the hell am I supposed to connect my IBM PS/2 Model M keyboard? No, I won't buy a new, low quality keyboard that doesn't click. Also, why would I ever buy a USB mouse...? I guess all those USB ports would come in handy for the whole 0 USB devices I own.

    I'm not sure what Abit was smoking when they came up with this design...it just boggles the mind. I have a Palm cradle and an HP Deskjet which conveniently wouldn't work because they use "legacy" interfaces. Maybe all those IDE channels could come in handy...oh wait, or I could just continue to use SCSI.

    In conclusion, "legacy free" = a load of cheap integrated crap with no backwards compatibility in terms of hardware. Way to go Abit (whose products I once purchased)...if I actually owned an Athlon or a Pentium 4 I know what I wouldn't be buying in terms of a mainboard.

    1. Re:My review... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use an adapter??????????? Uh yeah.

      http://www.infoaomori.ne.jp/DSC/product_usb_j.ht ml

    2. Re:My review... by pkesel · · Score: 1

      I have a Sony Clie (Palm like substitute) that syncs with a USB port, and a HP deskjet with a USB connection. And a USB mouse, digital camera, scanner, keyboard, and modem. Even my UPS has a USB connection. What do I have connected to the old-fashioned parallel or serial connection, or even PS/2 connector? NOTHING!

      In the mean time, I'm using four ATA hard drives, a CD-ROM drive, a CD-burner. I have an ide tape drive sitting here too. I also have a couple SCSI drives sitting here too, and guess what, they'd work on the new board with my PCI adapter!

      Stupid is as stupid does, and I'm doing the new board.

      --
      - Sig this!
    3. Re:My review... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I mean how the hell am I supposed to connect my IBM PS/2 Model M keyboard?"

      Use a cheapy adaptor, like the USB-PS/2 adaptor that came with my new mouse, I'm sure they make them to go from PS/2-USB.

    4. Re:My review... by IAmBlakeM · · Score: 1

      So don't buy the board, is it that hard?

      You use old hardware, why should NEW boards pander to your antiquation? USB is great. Plug in my printer, it's autoconfigured. Digital camera? Same. Webcam? Same. Mp3 player? Same.

      Why would you buy a USB mouse? Oh yeah, an optical USB mouse that works on any surface and never needs cleaning is such a PITA.

      SCSI is not for consumers. It's too expensive. Always has been, always will be.

      "Legacy free" = Realizing that most consumers looking to buy such a board are on the cutting edge of hardware and technology, not stuck in 80s.

    5. Re:My review... by Lithium+Element · · Score: 1
      So don't buy the board, is it that hard?
      I hope not...since I'm not going to buy it.

      You use old hardware, why should NEW boards pander to your antiquation?
      I don't know...backwards compatbility? You see, buying a new board doesn't necessarily imply building a completely new system with all new peripherals.

      Why would you buy a USB mouse? Oh yeah, an optical USB mouse that works on any surface and never needs cleaning is such a PITA.
      An optical PS/2 mouse requires just as little cleaning and it's supported without USB drivers (just needs a simple PS/2 port mouse driver)...neat eh?

      SCSI is not for consumers. It's too expensive. Always has been, always will be.
      Unfortunately...

      "Legacy free" = Realizing that most consumers looking to buy such a board are on the cutting edge of hardware and technology, not stuck in 80s.
      Actually, this machine (which has no USB or Firewire peripherals) doesn't contain any components from the 80s...though many of my other machines do. Having cutting edge hardware is fine, but I don't consider a "high speed" serial bus like USB to be the greatest thing since sliced bread. I mean, why not just stick those 2 simple PS/2 ports on there so that people can just use the same old PS/2 mice and keyboards?

      Let's not forget that parallel port printers are still plentiful and many people have the old serial Palm cradles around. I don't know about you, but I'm not a big fan of replacing all my peripherals to use a new board...especially my tough IBM Model M keyboards.

  115. Re:I think they're smoking ABIT of crack over ther by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there has never been anything bleeding edge about linux

  116. Re:Completely useless by bzbb · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, 120$ for a new ibm m-series is so cheap. I don't even know if they have them in usb. I don't like any other keyboard

    --
    The coffee god lives!
  117. Never something cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounded like a nice board till I read the words "integrated" and "3 pci".

    I want a board with at least 3 firewire and 4 usb. I want dual athlons and at least 6 pci. No ide though. Thats for the scsi card I would put in. I would think keeping the ps/2 would be good though...

  118. Magic bandwidth! by fm6 · · Score: 2
    you don't have to deal with SHARED bandwidth
    You mean two firewire devices on the same port don't share bandwidth? Amazing!
    1. Re:Magic bandwidth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You mean two firewire devices on the same port don't share bandwidth? Amazing!

      I think he means that you'd need well over 30 Firewire devices on one port to slow it down to anything near USB 1.0

  119. 10 USB devices, hrm. by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's funny, my motherboard can support 256 USB devices. I think what they mean as that the mobo has a build in hub.

    Most people won't use more then four or five USB devices. Whats really cool here is the firewire.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:10 USB devices, hrm. by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      No, the mobo has several built in USB controllers. Five to be exact.

      And I don't get why people are jonesing over so many built in ports either... put 2-4 on the back, a couple on the front, and then buy USB hubs as needed. You'll probably need the power boost anyway.

      Wish monitors still had USB built in (and there are some, but they're rare) - but price pressure and the slow acceptance of USB 2-3 years ago made that flop.

  120. Re:Completely useless by Arrgh · · Score: 1
    No, it's not completely useless to me. With my latest box, I've tried hard to remove all the legacy stuff (call it a fetish), and I've almost entirely succeeded:

    New:

    Mouse and Keyboard are USB, plugged into the "main" USB ports.

    Keyboard has two USB ports built-in, for ad hoc hot-plugging.

    Graphics tablet and joystick are plugged into one of those "extra" USB risers that came with the motherboard, an ABit KR7A-RAID.

    Legacy:

    Audio is still analog (stereo). Not for long.

    Unfortunately, our digital camera is ancient and only works with the serial port. So I could *almost* use the reviewed motherboard, but not quite.


    My buddy who does video editing would kill for six

  121. Re:Completely useless by Arrgh · · Score: 1

    Bugger it all... Continued:

    ...for six^W the ability to plug in six^Weight IDE RAID ports.

  122. Re:Completely useless by nosferatu-man · · Score: 2

    A $15 ps/2 -> usb dongle. Keep your old Model-M -- or, in my case, my $250 Kinesis Classic. PS/2 was a shitty stupid idea when it was introduced, and it's no less stupid now. I'm happy to see it go away.

    (jfb)

    --
    To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
  123. electronics enthuisist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just made learning electronics more difficult. There are numerous parts that rely on the serial or parallel ports because of their simplicity. I have yet to see a PICMicro programmer based on usb. Do they still make serial/parallel i/o cards for pc's that aren't based on extremely old ISA buses? In which case after the i/o card, decent sound card, etc this board seems to be pretty useless. Sounds like they included only 3 PCI to hide the fact that all the extra crude on the motherboard uses an insane amount of IRQs.

    1. Re:electronics enthuisist by Harumuka · · Score: 2

      BeyondLogic has information on programming USB. It's more difficult than serial, but if you really want to program serial/parallel it's a good idea to get a hold of a port replicator. I had one from PortSmith that turned a USB port into serial, parallel, and PS/2 ports. Worked great, I would have used it if I didn't have all this legacy junk on my system.

      --
      What do you think of MusicCity now?
  124. comment summary by syrinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) This board sucks! How am I supposed to connect my [10 year old piece of hardware] when there isn't a [PS2/Serial/Parallel/AT/ISA/Microchannel] [port/slot]?!?!? This can't POSSIBLY be for people building a new computer from the ground up, because, dammit, that's not what I do, so obviously no one else does either! And speaking of [10 year old piece of hardware], aren't I so 1337 for still using it? I thought so.

    2) [SCSI/IDE] rocks! [IDE/SCSI] sucks!

    3) Natalie Portman pours hot grits down my pants. Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  125. MediaXP? by RovingSlug · · Score: 2

    What exactly is it? I know the review briefly described it, but I was looking for something more detailed. Googling for "MediaXP" doesn't return any significant hits. What's up?

  126. Yesh. by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    USB is not the best way to run every device. PS2 style works much better for mice and keyboards. I have yet to use a USB printer. Homemade circuits are not easy to hook up to USB. Text terminals on USB?! Actually, the only thing I own that uses USB is my mouse, and I run it on a PS2 adapter.

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  127. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Odds are that his PCI slots work better than yours.

  128. Re:Beware a gimmick... but Abit does some good stu by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

    As for 12 IDE devices anyone know of a case that can cram that much into it?!

    Behold, the JCL Aluminum Server Case.

    http://www.lianli.com/11302001jcL_pc_case/jclpcc as e/new2001_11-12_pc_case/pc72SCA.html

  129. I'll Pay Extra for PS/2 by MBCook · · Score: 2

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I have tried many USB devices. I have a MS Intellimouse Explorer that can be USB or PS/2, and a MS Natural Keyboard Pro that can also be USB or PS/2. My grand master plan a while ago was to get rid of some of the legacy stuff in my PC so that I wouldn't have so many cables in the back, makeing it easier to make it look better, to unplug for upgrades, etc. Well, I tried it for about 1 day and went back to PS/2. Why? Because the thing I use my PC for more than anything else is gaming, and I could notice the delay in response between a USB keyboard and mouse and having them on the PS/2 ports, even when they were the only USB devices in the system. If I had the bios make them act like PS/2 devices, instead of windows, it was still noticeable. 100+ FPS in games like Quake 3 and Counter Strike is useless if your mouse/kb doesn't update fast or consistantly. Sure, when I need a mouse on my laptop, USB is great. When I need to borrow my mom's color ink jet instead of our network attached laser printer, it's great too. But when I need fast response time for killing that AWP whore, I'll take PS/2 any day. Frankly, I'm disappointed in USB, I'm still waiting for it to make my life easier.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:I'll Pay Extra for PS/2 by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Never mind gaming, such a lag from the mouse or keyboard in everyday use would drive me off my flip. I *notice* that sort of lag even in ordinary typing of text.

      And likewise, I just don't feel an overwhelming urge to replace all my peripherals ... SCSI scanner, parallel laserjet, Belkin KVM switch -- that's another $600+ right there. And if I want a dozen IDE drives, PCI RAID cards are about $30 each.

      I agree with those who've said yeah, it's consumer-cool for those who are buying all new from scratch, but it's not so great for the rest of us.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:I'll Pay Extra for PS/2 by DdJ · · Score: 1

      If you want to use PS/2 parts with this thing, no problem, *especially* if you already know you're willing to pay extra for it. Just get one of these:

      http://www.allusb.com/products/P11436.html

      It's a little pod full of legacy ports that you connect to your system via USB. They're generally targeted at laptops, but they'd be fine for this system. And you could hide the computer across the room and use a long cable with this thing to put your PS/2 ports right next to your monitor.

  130. Re:Completely useless by Cardhore · · Score: 2

    I agree with you. Often onboard sound chips cause problems with linux even though they can be turned off in the BIOS. It'd be nice to just have a motherboards with a bunch of pci ports and a bunch of usb ports.

  131. Re:Completely useless by TampaTim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And, no, sometimes you can't just turn these features off in the BIOS. Even worse, sometimes there's no way to reclaim the IRQs that are lost due to integrated functions! Check out some of the really bad implementations out there. It's a nightmare trying to make those poorly designed boards work.

    <RANT>
    I have to concur on this. My dad bought a Soyo K7V Dragon Plus! with onboard RAID. I configured the RAID and everything was working flawlessly until one day the RAID JUST STOPPED WORKING! It decided that the 2nd drive just was not connected. I wasted a whole weekend and lost a lot of data trying to get it working again. A week later my Dad noticed a little blurb in the documentation about not putting a SCSI card in PCI slot 2 because the IRQ on that slot is shared with the RAID. Well, there was no SCSI card in slot 2, but as it turns out the RAID broke(i didn't realize it at the time) right after I rearranged some PCI cards and ended up putting a FireWire card in slot 2. NICE F#$%#KING design, slot 2 is completly useless on that board if you are using RAID. What good are all these features if they don't WORK TOGETHER?
    </RANT>

  132. What we REALLY want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's kinda nice. But what I REALLY want is a MOBO with no integrated ANYTHING. Just IDE, USB, and a buttload of PCI slots (and 1 AGP slot)!!

    Let me choose my own Sound card / NIC / Video card / Modem, please!

    I bet $1 it has one of those damned 'shared memory' video cards. Nasty.

  133. This is a server, not a Gamerz box. by billstewart · · Score: 2
    Yes, you've got to use a USB keyboard and mouse instead of your current one, and you'll miss the grooves you've warning into the plastic obsessing on your favorite games, but you didn't buy a box with 12 IDE drives to use the for gaming! You bought it to be a server or movie production studio, or you bought it to build your own Tivo, and it's going to sit under the table and connect to your old machine by Ethernet or Wireless.

    Modern "legacy-free" computers work just fine with USB keyboards and mice, and if you don't like new mice, get a USB-to-serial converter to support your antique Logitech. The Firewire and USB2 mean you can plug in fast external devices, either inputs like video cameras or storage devices, and and as a bonus you can refill your MP3 player from the 3 YEARS OF CONTINUOUS MP3s it can hold :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:This is a server, not a Gamerz box. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you got me thinking..3 years = 3*360=1080 days*24=25920 hours*60=1555200 minutes*60=93312000 seconds. Assuming 192kbps, 93312000*192=17915904000kb/8=2239488000kB/1000=223 9488B/1024=2187M=2 gigs. Something went wrong there. 192kbps=24kB/s=24,000B/s. Oh forget it.

    2. Re:This is a server, not a Gamerz box. by bcaulf · · Score: 1

      You can do it in your head without a hitch if you use exponential notation. 192kbps = 2.4 x 10^4 bytes/sec. A day has 8.6 x 10^4 seconds. A year has 3.6 x 10^2 days. So neighborhood of 80 x 10^10 = 8 x 10^11 bytes/year. That's 800 gigs a year. The original poster was right, with the largest available drives you could have about 3 years of uninterrupted MP3s.

  134. Re:Completely useless by John+Ineson · · Score: 1
    Think of how much more stable the motherboards would be if there were less chips present and less IRQs being shared.
    "Duhhhh. PCChips use onboard stuff, and they're cheap, so it must be bad."

    Yeah, gee, putting the chips on different boards is going to help. We'll use the same architecture, but with longer traces, and copper contacts instead of solder joints. That figures.

  135. Re:Completely useless by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    If you had ever tried to build your own little hobbyist PCB shop, you'd either be laughing at how stupid your statement just sounded, or crying that it's out of your reach. Damn, what I wouldn't give, to be able to mask even 8k roms.

  136. Re:Completely useless by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

    I don't think so - I rather have intergrated components - as long as they work well (which in the case of my A7V-266E they do). For one thing it saves a whole lot of time and headache - because you know they tested it and its going to work most of the time.

    Not to mention this board - you can just buy it, plop a video card and a hard disk drive and your done - pc built :).

  137. Site /.'ed more info on motherboard by TampaTim · · Score: 1

    Click here for abit's info on the motherboard.

  138. Fan on the chipset by Cardhore · · Score: 2

    Wow, there's a fan on the KT333 chipset! I'd think with all the legacy stuff they removed, they wouldn't need a fan. The KT333 actually still has all the legacy functionality in it which might be why they need the fan.

  139. Why the PCI slots? by Animats · · Score: 2

    Most people don't use them, and they make the board and box far bigger. A no-slot version would be useful for a little-box-under-the-flatpanel-monitor form factor.

  140. Scary. by maikeru · · Score: 2, Funny

    An excerpt from Abit's MAX FAQ:

    WHAT IS MAX?

    Charlie, lead designer of the AT7: "I'm glad you asked me that. MAX is a mother board with a legacy-free device interface, maximized CPU performance and memory capacity, on-board LAN, 6 Channel Audio, USB 2.0 and IEEE1394a..."

    MAX: "Blah, blah, blah. Anybody can tell that by reading the specsheet! I'm more than a bunch of interfaces and memory slots! Without tooting my own horn, I'm everything anybody could possibly ever want in a computing system. I'm like the beautiful girlfriend you've always wanted who also cooks, cleans, mows the lawn, pays the bills AND lets you play CS all night-- if that's what you want."

    Charlie: "Well, I guess you could put it that way..."

    BUT WHY MAX?

    Charlie: "Good question. MAX fully utilizes system bandwidth and provides the best storage management currently available in a motherboard. Combine that with all the fully integrated extra features, and you have the ultimate integrated computer platform."

    MAX: "Charlie, We know that already. What people want to know is why would they want MAX. Well, the answer is, `cause I'll make your life easier, giving you more time to spend at the beach, or playing MOH: AA till your wrist seizes up and your brain melts."

    Charlie: "We didn't think of that whenwe included all the integrated extra features, but I suppose you're right."

    MAX: "Of course I'm right! I'm ABIT Engineered!"

    Charlie: "Before MAX interrupted me, I was going to mention that MAX users will have the best platform solution in the market, with the best design for users thanks to ABIT Engineering. Because MAX includes just about all the integrated features users will need in a motherboard, MAX is designed for now and the future."

    MAX: "That's right Charlie. I'm gonna be around for a long time...like Gandalf."



    All I can say is: Wow. That's the most horrible thing I've ever read.

  141. well, I do declare!!!!!!!!!! by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

    Wow, that reviewer guy likes exclamation points.

    I stopped reading after the second page, when I'd run out of fingers and toes to count them on.

    --
    I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
  142. The big prob with built-in stuff on the mobo... by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    I have an i810-based computer, and currently am using the on-board audio. Thing is, there is so much crosstalk from other devices on the motherboard like the IDE lines and so on that unless you are pumping high-volume sound around you still hear little subtle pings and hisses.

    I have heard that with the Nforce-based all-in-one motherboards the problem has pretty much been licked. However, I will not believe it until I hear it with my own ears.

    Meanwhile, I'm saving my pennies for an Audigy... unless Turtle Beach comes out with an audio card with a firewire port on it.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  143. Reclaiming interrupts? by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2
    What I want to know most is if you will be able to use this thing to reclaim interrupts which are usually used for PS/2 keyboard (IRQ2, I think), serial 1 (IRQ4) and 2 (IRQ3) and parallel port (often IRQ7).

    IRQ12, which is usually for the PS/2 Mouse, is probably the only interrupt that can be reclaimed. IRQ5 can probably be used by the on board sound.

    If you can't reclaim the resources, then dropping the connectors on the back is a step backwards, not a step forwards. And they probably can't reclaim the IRQ's because it would break compatibility with everything out there.

    Cryptnotic

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:Reclaiming interrupts? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      That's really an ironic question, considering IRQs were also supposed to be rendered obsolete some while back!! Didn't quite work out that way, did it? :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Reclaiming interrupts? by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      you can reclaim irq 3, 4, 7, and 12. Simply disable the device using them in the bios, and the irq becomes free. You can do this on any motherboard made in the last 5 years

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    3. Re:Reclaiming interrupts? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Not that you would really need to do so. This thing only has 3 PCI slots, and even assuming you install three non-compliant PCI devices that don't play well with others IRQ wise, you should still have plenty of room using 2/9, 10, 11.

      I don't think IRQs will be a problem, unless they designed the on board IDE ports so badly that they use tons of them in a non-shared sort of way.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Reclaiming interrupts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All modern boards should support APIC, so you have 255 IRQs.

      If this one doesn't, it ain't quite "legacy-free". If so, I'd take it back and get one that meets modern specs.

  144. No parallel port by Joel+Ironstone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think PC's lose their usefulness without paralle ports. If your trying to interface some simpel device you've made who wants to bother with USB interfaces and UARTs and stuff. Just read and write to the memory mapped parallel port. Its so easy! whay would I do with this?
    I suppose not buy it, but still. . .

  145. Re:Completely useless by T5 · · Score: 1

    I'd agree that there aren't a lot of supported USB devices for Linux yet (webcams in particular, due to lack of manufacturer openness about protocols), but to say that "Linux USB support isn't quite *there* yet" is a bit over the top.

    Sure, there have been some problems along the way with the hotplug code, but except for the now-rare occurance of a race condition due to autoloading dependent modules, I've had little to no problem with hotplugging.

    Keyboards and mice work with mini-HID drivers. The full-blown HID is pretty decent. Even some esoteric devices like USB multiport serial adapters from companies like keyspan work well.

  146. I do. by acoustix · · Score: 2

    AGP = TNT2
    PCI 1 - DVD decoder
    PCI 2 - Sound Card
    PCI 3 - Ultra ATA controller
    PCI 4 - Capture card
    PCI 5 - NIC
    PCI 6 - Modem

    All cards working fine, thank you very much. It's not hard to do. If you can't fill 6 PCI slots and get the cards working correctly then I would wonder about your actual computer knowledge.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:I do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not hard to do. If you can't fill 6 PCI slots and get the cards working correctly

      On how many systems have you gotten this to work? Getting ONE configuration to work is usually luck... The reality is that a lot of hardware has various 'soft' bugs like signal integrity issues.

  147. Abit KR7a Memory issues - May also by ghazban · · Score: 2

    The Abit KR7a with 4 RAM slots has ram issues which cause it to give memtest86 errors. This has been hypothesised to be caused by the non-standard amount of ram slots. This was a huge source of grief for me, and I eventually returned the board and had to get credit for the store. As this board also has 4 RAM slots, I would watch out for this board. I will never buy Abit products again because of their extremely high RMA rate.
    Please follow this link for details on the problem.

  148. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >"Duhhhh. PCChips use onboard stuff, and they're cheap, so it must be bad."
    >Yeah, gee, putting the chips on different boards is going to help. We'll use the same architecture, but with longer traces, and copper contacts instead of solder joints. That figures

    Yeah, but the average slashdot geek is too friggin' dumb to realise that PCChips is actually about 15 different companies (congratgulations on knowing that PC Chips is PC Crap, though!).

    Witness how idiots on slashdot constantly boost the ECS K7S5A. It's a PCCHIPS motherboard for crying out loud! You bought crap and you got lucky because you bought the only non-crap product from a manufacturer of pure CRAP. Don't tell me ECS is good until you either own it for a year or two, or buy another PCChips product (might I reccomend somthing with the Mega-TX+^2/Pro-Ultra-PC2500 chipset or something else purposely confusingly named that exists only because PC Chips is too cheap to even buy 3rd party chipsets?).

    Sorry, I just have to get that off my chest... Thanks for noticing how bad PC Chips is. :-)

  149. This isn't flamebait because dammit, it's TRUE... by MsGeek · · Score: 2
    http://www.lowendpc.com/

    Or if you want to see the true low-end hardcore:
    http://www.lowendmac.com/

    I have nothing but admiration for people who keep old machines alive, particularly when they spread their technological wealth around. Which reminds me: I will be decommissioning one of my machines soon. It was built in 1997 and was a real science experiment, hence the name it's held on my network, "Dexter." In fact, I brought the case cover to a comic convention and Genndy Tartakovsky drew his mad scientist character on it and autographed it for good measure.

    Dexter has been useful for all these years, and it's only because I have some new stuff coming in that I have to reluctantly decommission it. I'm keeping an eye out for a deserving new home for the thing. The scanner is going out the door too...it's an UMAX 600P and it is not supported in any OS beyond 98SE. SANE doesn't support it and UMAX doesn't make a 2K or XP driver for it either. It also barfs if connected to a computer with a processor that runs at or above 300MHz. Timing prob. Still works like a champ, too.

    This machine will be going to the Pacoima Community Center or somewhere else deserving.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  150. Re:Completely useless by shepd · · Score: 1

    >If you had ever tried to build your own little hobbyist PCB shop

    Mmmmm, the smell of Ferric Chloride and photo-resist in the morning.

    Can I puke now?

    I never once actually had a PCB come out right... Maybe I just suck too badly at it.

    Any tips? :-)

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  151. On a related note; by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

    Does anybody know of any GOOD front mount USB devices for a 5.25" bay? I DO NOT WANT one that includes a 5.25" to 3.5" adaptor, I have ENOUGH 3.5" bays in my full tower case, I just want to be able to plug in massive USB devices to the front of my computer. . . .

    Bleh.

    :(

    The ONLY solution to this problem that I have been able to figure out so far would be to mount a regular old USB hub in one of the bays with some screws and some very careful drilling into the Hub itself (I have found some Hubs that are of about the right size and would fit in a 5.25" bay just nicely) but this is far from optimal. . . .

    I mean WTF am I supposed to do with a shitpot load of USB ports AND NO DAMN WAY TO ACCESS THEM. Well except for from behind my case, but already I have WAAAY to many wires back there and it is a royal pain in the arse to have to reach back around behind my computer and try and grope for something remotly resembling a USB port to plug some device in to. . . . It would be nice to be able to actualy see the port. ^_^

    1. Re:On a related note; by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Does anybody know of any GOOD front mount USB devices for a 5.25" bay? I DO NOT WANT one that includes a 5.25" to 3.5" adaptor, I have ENOUGH 3.5" bays in my full tower case, I just want to be able to plug in massive USB devices to the front of my computer. . . .


      Hmmm... haven't had any luck on a quick search. If all else fails, I suppose you could nest a 3.5" USB device in the 5.25" one.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    2. Re:On a related note; by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Ugh, tell me about it, quick searchs are useless, it seems like NOBODY makes these!

      I mean the concept itself is simple enough, just take a regular USB hub, put on an adaptor for internal USB headers for it (you can buy those on the open market as it is) and put the thing in a box with the proper screwholes!

      The only issue is that the main potential purchaser of such devices would be the OEM market but OEMs do not typicaly run with cases that have a large number of unused 5.25" bays. :(

      Oh well, I guess I can always get a few more CD-ROM drives. . . . ^_^

  152. yeah, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two bp6's and a vp6 out of 8 Abit mobos in one year died on me.

  153. How about a BIOS revolution? by Wolfier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Argh. So many "legacy" ports got rid of...nice.
    Now, how about updating the bios, so that ALL the old ports are emulated? To the extent that DOS 5.0 will still install from scratch and run?

    Having a USB device is nice, but HARDWARE IS HARDWARE. They should function all by themselves with only the BIOS (think "safe mode"), and not only when some OS-supplied drivers are run.

    How else do people fix things when the drivers break?

    1. Re:How about a BIOS revolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not keep the ports and get rid of the 'legacy' 16-bit BIOS? Then DOS 5.0 won't even boot, so you don't need to worry about it.

      Hardware is hardware. And all PC hardware emulates some great IBM PC AT in the sky. That's the only reason the BIOS works.

    2. Re:How about a BIOS revolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But without a std BIOS interface, don't, say, non-USB OS's have trouble reading from a USB keyboard?

    3. Re:How about a BIOS revolution? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Upgrade to the next version of Windows.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:How about a BIOS revolution? by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      Why are you spending your $ on a new MB so you can run DOS5?

    5. Re:How about a BIOS revolution? by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      Getting rid of the "legacy" 16-bit BIOS gives you no benefit at all. The software's already there, and it costs nothing to put it there. It's only 256KB.

      The ability to treat your PC as some "great IBM PC AT in the sky" is essential in case something breaks, and you'll have something to fall onto - I'm assuming that the BIOS never breaks, which is often the case as they're burnt in Flash ROM, not written to some wimpy device like a hard drive. It is the assumption of Windows "safe mode".

      Which I really like to have on Linux - being able to fall back on the 16-bit BIOS-based "drivers" would be VERY useful for driver developers, and for hardware that a driver isn't written for yet.

      Isn't it great? I know if I want to I can make a DOS program that uses the GeForce3 pixel shaders - you just need to know about their register addresses and stuffs.

      ---------------
      Karma: 50. Please don't bother modding...

    6. Re:How about a BIOS revolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the cost is a bit higher than you suggest. PC AT register-compatibility is spread out across the cost of all components. But you are right that's probably not significant.

      I'll agree in the general principle of hardware abstraction, just disagree in the manner that's being done (16-bit, slow, ugly).

  154. Unless You'd Like the Added Peace of Mind of ECC by dmelomed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They claim they support ECC SDRAM, but they don't. Their motherboards run ECC SDRAM, but don't actually use the ECC hardware. See http://cr.yp.to/hardware/abit.html

  155. A warning to those wanting to use ECC SDRAM by dmelomed · · Score: 1

    They claim they support ECC SDRAM, but they don't. Their motherboards run ECC SDRAM, but don't actually use the ECC hardware. See http://cr.yp.to/hardware/abit.html

  156. c'mon, this is what they've all been promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Since ~1998, everone's been talking of eliminating all leagcy devices on the mobo, and the MAX seems like the first PC mobo to do that. The firewire brings it up to the level of the Mac (yes I like Macs AND PC's... got at problem?), the USB2 gives us that high-speed USB everyone's been talking about, the digital optical audio I/O gives us a real integrated sound solution, and the 12 ATA channels will allow me to use the other IDE drives I've accumulated throught my life (yes my life; first PC, a 286, at 3). As for Windoze 98 support, 98 sucks all ass anyway, even more than 2000 or XP.

    I personally will be getting one of these mobos as soon as I get up off of my 15-year-old geek ass and get a job. A leagcy free PC? Finally, the PC competes with the Mac.

  157. Re:Completely useless by Reziac · · Score: 2

    I *do* know what an AST Rampage is, and trust me, you're better off if you never have to find out! :)

    For the younger set, it was a memory card of the XT and 286 era, that with a matching driver provided an early version of EMS. In the days of memory chips socketed on the motherboard (generally 512k or 640k, but sometimes as much as 4mb), that's how you got beyond a given mobo's onboard memory limit. Most such cards were 8bit, tho high-end models were 16bit. They typically used very slow memory chips (up to 200ns).

    I have a BocaRAM card in my (t)rusty 286, to total a whopping 3 megs of RAM. :)

    And don't feel bad, I'm typing this on a lowly P233, and it works just fine too.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  158. Re:Completely useless by Reziac · · Score: 2

    [laughing] After reading this thread, I am REAL tempted to break out my XT (yes, I still own a working XT), install NetTamer on it, and post to Slashdot that way. :)

    To some degree, you're right -- the real test of geekdom is the ability to make stuff WORK, even old stuff if that's the current need. And sometimes the old stuff works BETTER -- but we've gotten used to the cranks of the new stuff and have forgotten how simple it was to merely move a jumper instead of argue with a PnP device that has weird ideas about what resources it wants to hog, and can't be taught different.

    To quote an old saw -- There are two kinds of fools: The first says "This is old, and therefore good." The second says "This is new, and therefore better."

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  159. Re:Completely useless by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    To be honest, I've yet to get one right. But ferric chloride is the scapegoat I'm using. That, and etchant tanks, seriously looking at building a spray etcher, with persulfate.

    Won't hurt when I have proper copper electroplating tanks, so that I can do real vias.

    Or a proper cnc drill.

    Or a laminator, so that I can do pretty soldermasks.

    Or a press, so that I can do multilayer.

    I just need to win the lottery, that's all.

  160. Re:Completely useless by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Amen. Geeks suck. I'm sick and tired of hearing about "geeks" who are great people because they can do drugs and get laid like all the other idiots on campus. I'd much rather be a sober nerd who can integrate the equations in the back of the book, and who gets married to the first woman he lays.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  161. No. of USB Ports overstated by gambit3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Overstated, because, even with 4 USB 1.1 ports, when you take out the PS/2 ports, then your mouse and keyboard will inevitably go into one of those, bringing the number down to 2.

  162. kernel compile time? by JDizzy · · Score: 2

    One thing I hate about these supposed hardware sites is the lack of kernel compile times. Lets face it GCC is the best benchmark tool ever made. Period the end, indisputable... you cannot argue that! Anyways... I sure would like to see a real benchmark site one of these days. I'm sure they exist, but I don't' see those listed on /. very much. I did notice the raid chip doesn't support level 5, but does support 0+1 raid.. and that actual faster, but more expensive to get into. Oh well... I guess we should all expect to replace our old serial keyboards with the new serial keyboards (aka USB, etc..). My SGI boxes at work all have USB terminal connects... when will the rest of the hardware world catch up?

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
  163. Don't like it? Don't buy it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Half the messages here are from people saying "they did it all wrong" or "I don't need all this integrated stuff". Fine. If you don't like it, don't buy it. There are about a million other motherboards with all the standard ports and lots of PCI slots. Why is everyone complaining just because someone decided to make something different? It's not like they're replacing all other models with this one.

  164. Re:Completely useless by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
    I am REAL tempted to break out my XT (yes, I still own a working XT)...

    I still own one of the original Compaq "luggables" -- serial #1555. It was originally built as a dual-floppy PC clone, then upgraded to an XT clone (a 10 megabyte hard drive, twice the size of the 5 MB drives in IBM XT's at the time).

    It still works. I occasionally pull it out of the closet and turn it on to show it to visitors. But, it has an early version of DOS with no networking at all.

  165. USB Mice by TellarHK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Honestly, I can't stand USB mice. I do like my USB keyboard, but every time I use the USB mouse under high load, my pointer gets laggy. To heck with that. I'd vastly prefer legacy for at least that -one- peripheral where the responsiveness of an interrupt driven input device is actually meaningful.

  166. Re:Completely useless by agallagh42 · · Score: 2

    Gotta love Asus. I had an MSI K7T266 Pro2 die on me after two months. Just replaced it with an Asus A7V333-R. Hopefully it'll last as long as my old P2B-S did (4 years and still going).

    This new asus is pretty sweet too. Most of the good parts of this Abit board (4 USB1.1, 4 USB2.0, 1 FireWire, 2 IDE, 2 IDE RAID, 5.1 sound), and still has 2 PS/2, 2 serial, 1 parallel, and 5 PCI slots.

    --
    Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
  167. Re:Completely useless by digitalunity · · Score: 2

    Actually, I think that is the board. I've had it for two or three years now. Works flawlessly. With updated Via 4in1 drivers for Win98, it works great under windows. Unfortunately, I'm bound to Windows because of work. I have to use SolidWorks and 3dStudio Max 4, both Windows only.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  168. Why have both USB 2.0 *and* 1.1?? by nobodyman · · Score: 1


    USB 2.0 is backwards compatible with 1.1, right? so Why have a mix of 2.0 and 1.1.?

    I'm sure the answer was that 1.1 ports are cheaper, but I would rather have 5 decent 2.0 ports than a mix.

    Can you physically plug a 2.0 device in a 1.1 port? If so, I can see people plugging in there new 40x usb 2.0 cd burners into the wrong port, wondering why they keep spitting out coasters.

  169. Re:Completely useless by digitalunity · · Score: 2

    Hotplugging is very important. It's one of the most touted features of USB. It works most of the time.

    My only really serious problem was getting my Epson 777 usb printer to work. I tried newsgroups, and getting support but I couldn't make it work. It's a nice printer, with built-in support for text. That's why I thought it was weird that it wouldn't work, because even set up as a generic text printer, it still wouldn't work. Oh well...

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  170. I think they fucked up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A motherboard with neither serial nor parallel ports, leaving modems, mice, printers and other peripherals out in the blue. I for one would never buy one, how the hell would I connect my (geee, ancient, centronic-only!) printer?. As a gamers platform, sure. But to actually use it for something but the coolness factor I need something more.

    Also, ten IDE devices when we all know that the only disks _not_ braking down within (or about) the warranty time is SCSI?! They can't be betting anything much on this board, more than the hype and coolness factor.

    Would _you_ depend in IDE disks for vital company data?

    /Mike

  171. Work Ethic by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I really don't understand why they introduced the PS/2 mouse interface at all..

    So that people would pay more attention when plugging in their mice and keyboards. In the old days, people just reached around and plugged 'em in by feel. This made computer guys look bad, because easy == lazy == bad.

    So they changed it so that your chances are a cointoss unless your turn the machine around and look at the damned colors or shine a light on it. Hard == hard working == good.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Work Ethic by Elm+Tree · · Score: 1

      Do you know how annoying this is on a group of rack-mounted servers?

  172. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job losing data on RAID. That's why it's called Redundant, because you're not supposed to use RAID 0.

  173. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way*-Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice being able to unplug a USB mouse then plug it back in and not be detected.

  174. Re:No ATAPI on Raid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people like to keep DVD/CD drives and CD-RW on separate channels. But the Highpoint Raid (4 channel) controller, is very shaky with optical devices.
    I also thought gamers loathed on-board sound and lan 'cause it sucked processor power from where it's needed.
    Lastly, Making the statement, "XP only" makes me shudder as much as the term "Winmodem".
    Legacy is the thing that makes bleeding edge stuff worth something when the wind changes.
    (Abit KR6A-RAID user)

  175. Re:Completely useless by torqer · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to expand on this just a bit. Not only are all the traces for the integrated chips on board... but the manufacturer can test it more thoroughly and more efficiently. They choose the NIC / Sound / IDE raid / whatever. They don't have to test it to see if 47 different NE2000 NICs work. And once it works, it works.

  176. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He may not be 100% right but he's no troll.

  177. The REAL problem is the use of a VIA chipset by Chas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    YES, VIA may have the best performance for the Athlon platform right now.

    And YES, the VIA chipset boards would be slightly cheaper than nForce boards with similar bells and whistles.

    But nobody, and I mean NOBODY but the true DIY masochists WILLINGLY put up with a VIA chipset!

    Their service history of the last few chipsets can't exactly be described as "rock solid" here.

    k around the hardware message boards for a while. Look at the people who are having problems with their Athlon-based systems. The top three problems are:

    1. User/Builder Error.
    2. Dead component
    3. Issues with a VIA chipset

    Now don't get me wrong. Other chipsets have their own issues as well. But how many of the chipset makes have the high running tally of problems that VIA has had?

    I, and many other builders, ESPECIALLY those building for other people's systems, would rather pay a little bit more, and settle for slightly lower performance than deal with a VIA product.

    VIA simply needs to work on improving their track record for a while before any serious builders are comfortable with them again.

    Fool me once, shame on you.

    Fool me twice, shame on ME!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:The REAL problem is the use of a VIA chipset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen brutha! I have had (about) 30 Intel chipset mobos in 10 or so years and maybe 5 via's. the Via's ALWAYS gave me crap, always little ass ache problems directly attributed to the chipset needed some special attention or just plain sucking.

      Dang Via chipsets! Dang them all to Heck!!

      (hehe, 'dang')

      -c@

    2. Re:The REAL problem is the use of a VIA chipset by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      Wish I had known about this myself sooner as I just spent many hours the last few days dealing with USB ports on an abit motherboard with an onboard VIA chipset which I couldn't get to talk properly to USB peripherals (Scanner, Modem). It was a strange problem as everything would seem to be OK yet the computer couldn't communicate reliably for any length of time with the USB peripherals. I had returned one scanner thinking it was the problem with that scanner's drivers (sorry, Staples). After an hour of phone tech support trying to get a USB scanner working with the usual reinstalls and registry munging (again, sorry to waste your time, Epson!), the tech suggested getting an USB card to replace the onboard VIA ones as nothing else seemed to work. Taking that advice (after finding out similar advice here http://www.osopinion.com/perl/story/16674.html and from related links there and trying other simple workarounds), I just bought a PCI USB card with an alternate chip set (NEC) to replace the onboard ones on the abit motherboard (KT7A-RAID). New card (SSIG USB 2.0 Adapter) works great and gives me USB 2.0 as well.

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  178. I can't find what I want. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
    Damnit, I can't find any 56k modems under either FireWire or USB 2.0.

    This motherboard sucks, I can't even connect to the internet with it. :)

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  179. They got rid of the wrongs stuff by line-bundle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They should have gotten rid of the floppy port and the IDE (use scsi).

    The board is not as big a leap as apple made in the iMac.

  180. This board is "the suck" by Erik+Fish · · Score: 1

    USB adapters for "legacy" devices can be flaky and just add another potential point of failure to your machine. USB itself was designed specifically by Intel to suck CPU and thus cause people to buy faster processors sooner than they otherwise would. From a performance perspective it's got to be one of the biggest scams in the computer industry and I refuse to participate. If for some bizzare reason in the future I need to use USB I'll find an old, cheap mobo and throw together a machine specifically for that purpose rather than waste cycles on my primary rig with such nonsense.

    Integrated peripherals are to be avoided at all cost. What do you do when you can't just unplug it? Disable it in the BIOS. What if disabling it in the BIOS doesn't really fully disable it? What if you can't get to the bios because your integrated video took a shit? What if you can't plug in another video card because the integrated video isn't disabled in the BIOS? No matter what, I *always* want the option of stripping my computer down to nothing but mobo and CPU with no worries about weather or not some major peripheral is TRULY out of the equation.

    Everybody seems to have forgotten that motherboard manufacturers tend to stop supporting their products long before companies like Creative Labs. What if the drivers for all these off-brand integrated peripherals are complete ass? What if they are good now but later on start sucking? What if they stop making updates in six months or updates take forever? I've seen all these things happen and more.

    Onboard peripherals get shitty support from their manufacturers because they are seen as "freebies". Even on Nvidia's latest motherboard the integrated GeForce isn't compatible with the standard Detonator drivers and updates are much slower in coming.

    Beyond all this, I don't enjoy looking like a fucking chump because I've got a shitload of redundant ports on the back of my machine that all go to disabled on-board components. Maybe that's a personal problem as for years I have associated this with shitty machines that say things like "Compaq" or "Packard Bell" on their cases (and within the past five years, shitty machines with *any* OEM brand I recognize on them).

  181. Re:Completely useless by Reziac · · Score: 2
    I still own one of the original Compaq "luggables" -- serial #1555. It was originally built as a dual-floppy PC clone, then upgraded to an XT clone (a 10 megabyte hard drive, twice the size of the 5 MB drives in IBM XT's at the time).

    Wow, that's just about a certifiable antique! And was probably a honkin' screamer in its day, too.

    I was trying to find my XT a good home (10MHz, 60mb of HD space, VGA -- Trident 8900 ISA cards work fine in an 8bit slot -- and it even knows the right year!) but just as well there were no takers -- while back I needed it to beta-test a fix-util for an old program that's still in wide use. And it's kinda cool to have at least one working system from every major hardware era, eh? :)

    I know a guy who still uses his old luggable CP/M machine, because he can't find a more-recent replacement for one particular program that he can't live without.

    Personally, I hate to throw out working hardware, no matter how outdated. Besides, old parts sometimes come in handy -- I support several folk with old machines and no money, and they're gradually using up my stock of ancient components. :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  182. Cost effective? Let's compare. by Chas · · Score: 4, Informative

    IDE

    160GB x 12 = 1920GB (1.920TB) (Due to HD reporting, it'll actually be about 1.788TB for real.)

    Disk System Price: $2400

    Options?

    1. The 160GB disks are only 5400rpm and have 2MB cache. Drop to 120GB disks and you can get a 7200rpm disk with 8MB of cache.
    2. Use the IDE RAID

    SCSI

    181.6 x 30 = 5448GB (5.448 TB) (Due to HD reporting, it'll actually be about 5.073TB for real.)

    Disk System Price: $30,230 (With DC controller.)

    Options?

    1. The 181.6GB disks are 7200rpm (albeit with 16MB cache). You can drop to the 72/73GB disks and get 10K and 15K disks for half than HALF the price. Even though said drives will probably only mount half the cache, the average seek times will be approximately HALF that of the higher capacity drive.
    2. Buy a DC SCSI >B>RAID controller instead of just a standard SCSI controller.

    Basically, it all REALLY depends on what you want to do with the system. That and take a look at any of the recent comparisons between SCSI and IDE drives (especially the aforementioned 120GB WesDig JB drives).

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  183. Non-legacy? What about IDE and floppy? by the_arrow · · Score: 1

    I thought that IDE was "legacy" by now? It's a shame SCSI disks still are so expensive.
    And what about the floppy controller? Can't be more legacy than that! It probably still can't handle anything else than PC-formated disks.

    --
    / The Arrow
    "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
  184. Obviously this sort of board ain't for you then! by Chas · · Score: 1

    I wish motherboard manufacturers would stop integrating all this useless stuff.

    So, because YOU don't use the stuff, manufacturers simply shouldn't produce ANY products built in this fashion? A bit self-centered there neh?

    I don't want integrated sound, IDE RAID, or any of that other junk. I don't even particularly care for integrated IDE.

    Plain and simple. BUY ANOTHER BOARD THEN!

    I know it sounds like I'm trolling. I'm not trying to really be abrasive (well, not TOO much). But you've got to understand, that simply because you're not in the market for a product like this doesn't mean there isn't a market for it. Unfortunately, there's a MASSIVE market for this kind of thing.

    Sure, I'd like a bare board with maximum PCI slots, an AGP slot, and pretty much NOTHING else as well. Then I COULD slap tons of SCSI equipment on there and not have to worry about it.

    The problem there is that most of the Big Names in commodity-class motherboards don't see a big enough market for it.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  185. Re:Completely useless by IAmBlakeM · · Score: 1

    ..then..don't..buy..it..

    USB works. I've never had a USB problem I couldn't easily fix.

    Why integrate things? Yeah, being able to essentially run your system from the board is SUCH a pain. Don't like integrated LAN and Audio? Turn them off in BIOS. That too much to ask? 9 seconds of your time?

    PS/2 is antiquated. Out with the old, in with the new. These boards aren't designed to be drop in replacements and work with your old hardware, they're designed for NEW systems.

  186. Sun optical mice by David+Jao · · Score: 1
    A bunch of people have already pointed out that today's optical mice don't need the special mousepad that the Sun optical mice needed.

    In my experience, another big thing going for the modern optical mice is that they're a hell of a lot lighter than the old Sun mice. I find it a lot more comfortable to mouse around all day with a light mouse than a heavy mouse.

  187. Optional Legacy by Bondolo · · Score: 1

    I agree that it should be 6 PCI slots, but beyond that, Abit should sell an addon $20 PCI card for the knuckle draggers that includes the PS/2 ports, a parallel and a 9 pin serial port.

    I don't want or need all those extra ports. Ethernet, USB, FireWire is already 2 too many it seems. Have you looked at a Sony VAIO laptop lately? Sheesh! Its got so many fricking ports, I'd bet most owners can't even tell you what they are all for.

    Useless, redundant mostly obsolete ports == bad.

    --
    -- "Most people prefer a popular myth to an unpopular truth"
  188. Abit's GPL violations by KjetilK · · Score: 2

    I just wondered if anybody knows more about what it came to with Abit's allegded GPL violations. And their Gentus Linux is dead isn't it?

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  189. Asus Makes boards with 6 usb ports by E1v!$ · · Score: 1

    It seems for the past year, Asus has been offering 6 usb ports on their top boards.

    Also 6 IDE? The current generation IDE drives (IBM/Maxtor) don't have the best track record. If I've enough data to put 10 spindles turning(minus 2 for removable media) I'll go scsi!

  190. And the point is.. ??? by trumpetplayer · · Score: 1

    So this is about a new expensive motherboard with no RS-232 (so I can't connect it to my mobile phone, to my self-programmed microcontrollers and so on) and will not allow me to use open OSs but only Windows. Plain weird, I think that this makes no fscking sense.

  191. Re:Cost effective? Let's compare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should include failure/replacement costs in your totals. Check the warrenties and MTBFs of the SCSI drives versus the IDE ones!

  192. Where's the H??? by rcs1000 · · Score: 2

    Quoth the review:
    It is FINALLY time to get rid of that old mouse... While you're at it, toss out that old Dot Matrix printer, and even the $13 keyboard with the ASDFJKL: keys completely rubbed off!

    Aaarggghhh. If your keyboard doesn't have an H, it's probably time to upgrade!

    --
    --- My dad's political betting
    1. Re:Where's the H??? by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      The H isn't a home key. asdf and jkl; are.

      If you were meaning to include other keys between the two, you forgot g too.

  193. Re:Completely useless by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    What's a motherboard to you? A RAM bank, CPU slot, anda PS/2 port so you can enter the programs to be run?

    You've just ranted about how you love 1993 motherboards. So, here's a tip: enjoy your 486. Nowadays, people can integrate extra functionality into a motherboard easily because the manufacturing process is so great. Granted, this has some bad effects (active cooling on the northbridge, usually by way of a cheap fan which fails after a couple months of serwice), but it's better overall for everyone.

    Business and most home users don't have to buy expensive cards with features they'll never use to get audio beyond the stupid PC speaker (do you not like how the PC speaker is on every system as well?). USB is a standard, and it's a well implemented standard which lets me easily swap devices around while going between my main work computer and whatever other computer's on the bench without an expensive KVM. Do that with PS/2 without frying some ports. Oops, PS/2's not hotplugable by design! Hov about firewire? Do you have having high speed tranfers? Do you prefer the slow and limited lpt ports instead? Or are those too "damned useless" and shouldn't also be integrated?

    Have you looked into a 1993 PC? A mess of cables from all the parts and port headers. A minimum of 4 expansion cards (NIC, sound, video, lpt/serial), and a cost more than any integrated board.

    USB is great. Firewire is great. Everything should be hotpluggable on a PC, like it is on a mainframe. It's easier to manage, and easier to fix. Open, large cases with well laid out boards and no nest of wires everywhere. It's a joy to work on.

    PS/2 ports just take up backplane space, ditto for the other legacy ports. Except for my main PC, I don't want to spend another 200$ to add sound when I can get a low-cost, general purpose, industry standard sound output from it with an onboard chip.

    If the market for such boards wasn't great, I'm sure that they wouldn't be out.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  194. Re:first YOSHINOYA post! by Iberian · · Score: 0

    Dude outside of Japan nobody knows about Yoshinoya.

  195. ...but no AGP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great board, but no AGP? No, thanks.

    1. Re:...but no AGP! by iainr · · Score: 1

      Oooh yeessss there iiissss

  196. It's pretty easy to drop legacy technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when you control only five percent of the market.

  197. Re:Completely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if people can afford this board, why have onboard sound and NIC? you can get all that for less then $100 and it will be better then that onboard crap

  198. Re:Completely useless by QuietRiot · · Score: 2
    Seems it might pay sometime to RTFM. You could have saved you and your dad a lot of time, trouble and data.....

    I know - Hindsight is usually pretty damn good - but it's a good point to be made - in general. Be farmiliar with what your dealing with in order to set it up and diagnose properly.

    True, sucky design, but you should have known.

  199. Re:Completely useless by cb0y · · Score: 0

    DOnt these modern boards have audio 'errors' on POST time, in english/chineese?

    "WARNING: slot2 sharing "

    256kb ROM of audio is enough, or 80kb text 2 speech synth, even C-64 could do it via 3000 line hex codes from a magazine in 87

  200. USB - firewire adaptor/hub? by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    USB uses ALOT of cpu usage... is there any sort of usb hub that connects to the computer via a firewire port? firewire deals with devices by itself - no cpu interaction required. by having a usb hub/router on firewire, the hub/router could deal with all that w/o using up precious cpu cycles.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:USB - firewire adaptor/hub? by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Now that would be something to see, a firewire keyboard and mouse.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  201. Re:Completely useless by Zathrus · · Score: 2

    Think of how much more stable the motherboards would be if there were less chips present and less IRQs being shared.

    Uh... you realize that most of the things you just whinged about are all on ONE chip, right? USB, IDE, and sound are all integrated into the south bridge of modern chipsets. The only thing you have to do is throw down traces (and maybe a few pots/resistors) to the physical connector.

    As for IRQ sharing - gee... funny thing there... serial, parallel, and PS/2 ports all take up a IRQ each. USB takes up one. Period. Of course, the flip side is that IDE still sucks up an IRQ per channel, so I doubt there's any less IRQ sharing going on with this particular board.

    And, no, sometimes you can't just turn these features off in the BIOS. Even worse, sometimes there's no way to reclaim the IRQs that are lost due to integrated functions! Check out some of the really bad implementations out there.

    So quit buying bad implementations and then whining about it. I have a variety of mobos from a variety of manufacturers (Abit, Asus, Gigabyte, Iwill) and they all work fine in this regard.

    Frankly, getting rid of legacy is good. If we could just be rid of the damn 16-bit BIOS things would be a whole lot better, at least in theory.

  202. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way*-Linux by Zathrus · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's so much better to unplug a PS/2 mouse, plug it back in, and have the entire system lock.

  203. where's the ISA by aglio412 · · Score: 1

    i'm not ashamed to admit this...in one of my boxes i still use an ISA SCSI card...

    1. Re:where's the ISA by Mr.Phil · · Score: 1

      ISA is going to be difficult if not impossible to get on any new motherboards. Of course, you can always get a 2940 PCI card very cheap, and get a huge increase in bandwidth over the PCI bus.

  204. On-board features by alexo · · Score: 1

    Which brings us to another topic.

    Many motherboards today include features that were traditionally used as add-on cards. IDE RAID controllers (usually HighPoint or Promise), sound, video, IEEE1394, etc.

    I'd like to hear your opinions on what can be considered decent (or even good) on-board solutions as compared price/feature/performance-wise to their add-on counterpats.

    Here's what I gathered so far:

    Integrated video: The concensus seems to be "don't bother".

    Integrated RAID: Several recommendations for HPT 372.

    Integrated sound: nForce, C-Media (which?) are OK. AC97 is junk.

    Thanks.

  205. x10 controller? by geekplus · · Score: 1

    Where can I get one? I've told those guys I have absolutely *no* use for a camera no matter how tiny!

  206. What? USB+PS/2 KVMs are NOT that expensive by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

    My Belkin F1DS104T disagrees with you. It has PS/2 inputs and four ports of PS/2 or USB (your choice per-port) goodness. It also supports 1600x1200 resolutions at 85Hz without blurring. Oh, yeah - I got it for about $130 from Pricewatch, and I'd consider that to be pretty reasonable for a very high quality piece of hardware that works perfectly 100% of the time.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  207. all about the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    making this piece of hardware that
    discards the "old" in favour of the
    new even when the old works fine is
    about genetating damand for the new.
    thankfully, we are in an informed and
    open market that knows that this is
    the case. so, such a product won't be
    an instant "hit" ... right ?

  208. linux support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Considering it does not support Win98 probably indicates it needs an OS that supports ACPI meaning that a plain Red Hat or SuSE install might not work.

    The lack of PS/2 ports will not cause any problems for Red Hat 7.1 and later (and probably not for SuSE either). I have been able to install using USB keyboard and mouse for a long time. As long as you don't connect them to the USB2 ports as those are not yet supported by Linux unless you go to a 2.5 kernel.

    But to say this is the ultimate systemboard... It only has 3 32bit/33Mhz PCI slots. The systems I normally work with have 64bit/66Mhz and some even 64bit/100MHz and 133MHz (PCI-X) slots.

    At the very least they could use 64bit/33MHz slots as they are 100% backward compatible with 32bit/33MHz (5v). For 66MHz and up you need 3.3v capable PCI cards.

    I know this is a limitation of the chipset used, and not Abit's fault. No consumer chipset has support for more then 32bit/33MHz. You need to to to Intel's 850 or ServerWorks chipsets for more.

    Also the memory interface of the Abit chip does not support interleaving. a decent server chipset supports this, doubling your memory throughput.

  209. Re:Completely useless by spitzcor · · Score: 1

    I may be speaking completely out of my rear end here but I can think of another reason to ditch the ISA stuff. I hear ISA is slow. Probably still runs at 8MHz for compatablities sake. Aren't the serial, parallel, and PS/2 ports all hung off the ISA bus. Getting rid of the ISA bus probably results in less device interrupts as well. Somebody with a clue have anything to add to this. I don't know my PCs as well as I used too.

    -spitzcor

  210. Aimed at the consumer market by JPriest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    4 RAID ATA/133's also non RAID capible and 2 standaed ATA/133. Hmm.. that's only 12 drives, the article said it's aimed at the consumer market because it uses ATA/133 instead of SCSI but who has a case that's going to hold 12 drives? On the plus side anyone that does use that many drives probably has most of the HDD's they've ever owned connectd to the motherboard, many of them before SCSI's time. That's where I think it makes sense to use ATA, no home user is going to go out and buy 12 SCSI drives and it's too early to have them laying around just yet. This does mark a nice milestone and I will someday soon enjoy running a quad RAID 0 system + my two CD drives. Now that the memory clock sppeed has bypassed AMD's FSB and many new chipsets are structured to run them out of sync you will see additional performance for DMA. It's good to see someone finding a use for it.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:Aimed at the consumer market by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      12 drives is unlikely, but 6? There are six connectors, and while you can connect two drives to each... connector... Only using one will offer you performance benefits. I have 2 HDs, a DVD and a CDRW, and I use my built-in RAID as well as the non-raid connectors, only I only use one driver per device. Be sure and get rounded cables tho, it gets busy in there real quick!

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    2. Re:Aimed at the consumer market by ameoba · · Score: 2

      High-end consumer market... Let's look at some possibilities here:

      For starters, if you want good performance out of an IDE system, you only put a single device on each channel. Bringing you to only 6 possible drives. 2 System drives in a RAID, on the HPT chip, DVD, CD-RW with 2 channels free. You could get a $BIGSIZE drive to store your MP3/pr0n collection, internal Zip, DVD burner, or whatever super-cool toy comes down the line 6mo from now.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  211. Re:I think they're smoking ABIT of crack over ther by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I'm missing something but I'm running Mandrake 8.2 with USB - mouse, keyboard, printer and scanner with no problems at all.

  212. It still has one legacy port by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    The floppy connector.

    Which, with all those IDE connectors would have been piss easy to dump.

    Afterall IDE floppy drives have been arround for at least 5 years (both the normal 1.4MB type & the 1.4MB/120MB supper floppy type), actually if you search hard enough on the web you can find 5.25" CD-ROM/floopy combo IDE drives (yes they don't just make em for laptops).

  213. Re:Completely useless by QuietRiot · · Score: 2
    This is an EXCELENT idea!!!! You must tell people about this. Drive a PC speaker directly - with a LED that indicates "there is an error somewhere - hook up your PC speaker to hear it." Would even work on a headless box!

    Wow!

  214. Re:What? USB+PS/2 KVMs are NOT that expensive by elmegil · · Score: 2

    The last Belkin KVM I owned was a PoS, I don't plan to spend money on them again. But thanks for the info; if they're doing it, certainly someone else will catch on.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  215. No, it doesn't look like it... by ddstreet · · Score: 1
    So I can use the keyboard without configuring USB in the OS?

    Short answer : not right now (based on results from my quick test).

    Long answer : What happens is, the BIOS (if configured to do so) takes control of the USB Host Controller and talks (in a very simplistic way) to any attached USB keyboard(s) and possibly mouse/mice. The BIOS re-routes all scancodes/mouse event to appear as if they were generated by a PS/2 keyboard/mouse.

    The BIOS continues to do this until the OS switches control of the USB Host Controller (the 'hand-off'). If the OS never switches control (e.g. DOS) then the USB keyboard will continue to appear to be a PS/2 keyboard. There is actually a decent description of this on M$'s website. And they have a detailed technical explanation (with pseudocode of course) of what goes on also. Note that I am almost positive that the Linux HCDs do not perform the hand-offs described there. Maybe I should add that. ;)

    However, I just tested this and it appears that Linux does the USB HC hand-off as soon as the kernel is loaded (for the 2.4 kernel, with my config, at least). I had USB as modules and rm -rf all the USB modules, so it shouldn't take over the USB HC...I'm guessing that it takes it over during PCI bus initialization, not USB initialization (I may be wrong here).

    So, no, you can't use a USB keyboard without native Linux OS support :(
    Unless, possibly, you disable PCI support. That might prevent Linux from taking over the USB Host Controller. Maybe. I'm guessing.

    The best option would be to enable USB and at a minimum the HID-Keyboard and Input-keyboard drivers. Then your kbd should work fine.

    I'm pretty sure that in older (2.2) kernels it didn't take over the USB HC...I know my USB mouse worked (via BIOS translation) up until the point I 'modprobe usbcore'...

    1. Re:No, it doesn't look like it... by Cuthalion · · Score: 1
      Here's my guess:

      The BIOS has a driver for USB keyboard. But if we enumerate all the OS's that use the BIOS instead of having native drivers, we get the following list:
      1. DOS
      So as soon as Linux starts using its 32 bit PS/2 driver instead of just using the crufty 16 bit software interrupt handlers that the BIOS installs, it stops reaping the rewards of the BIOS knowing more than it does.
      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
  216. Power and heat? by Airegin · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt that you can just plug 12 IDE hard drives without having power and heat generation problems with the regular computer case. If you want a mobo like that just so you can keep adding disks you're heading for trouble, unless you get a decent case with a super power supply. Power shortage can be a crashy experience.

    --
    Airegin
  217. Noooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean I have to pay $30 for an adapter for my $5, 10-year-old Model M keyboard and even then it STILL won't work?

    Whores.

  218. Re:Completely useless by NMSpaz · · Score: 1
    Well, I strongly advise checking to see if it's a KA7 or KA7-100. If so, check the bank of 16 capacitors next to the CPU slot, and see if they are leaking diaelectric (black crud spilled out onto the motherboard below them, and often on top as well). Also make sure that the tops of the caps are flat, and not starting to bow.

    I don't want to sound too paranoid, but although I love the KA7 in most respects, I'm 3 for 3 on having the capicators blow. Also, I'm nowhere near being alone in this.

    If your caps are leaky (JPCON is the brand of these suckers), start making backup plans-- either start saving for an upgrade, or buy some replacement caps.

  219. Re:Completely useless by ameoba · · Score: 2

    Oh how quickly you forget...

    having all of the STANDARD components that a VAST MAJORITY of computer users are going to be using integrated on the motherboard, with guaranteed compatability between them is a bad idea. I sure wanna go back to the days when NOTHING was built onto the motherboard and I had to go out and buy my serial/parallel/fdd/hdd controlers and add them onto the board.

    And what's the point in bringing up poor implimentations? Integrated hardware or not, you'll still have cut-rate crappy hardware, better to have it integrated so that you have some hope of it working together without catching on fire.

    And most integrated hardware these days is fine.. integrated audio is good enough for non-audiophiles. Integrated video good enough for those who aren't demanding gamers. Integrated IDE is good enough for those who don't want to run multi-TB databases. Integrated NICs are good enough unless you have the bandwidth to saturate a 100Mb connection.

    Notice a trend here? If the standard integrated componets aren't good enough for your needs you belong to a SMALL NICHE MARKET that has more demanding standards than the vast majority of users, and as such are going to need more expensive high-end hardware. I'm sure you'd like to live in a utopia where everyone had the very best in hardware, but I like being able to buy my father an $800 machine that's got more power than he'll ever need to use.

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  220. 10 IDE drives by antirename · · Score: 1

    Ok, so you've got this board in a full tower case with plenty of drive bays. But, you can only put two drives on one IDE cable. Now, you want to add some RAM or generally get to the board. That's a lot of plastic and wire in the damn way, if you ask me. Routing all those wires will be a bitch. Bet you couldn't find your sharpie to label those drives when you bolted them in... can you even see the master/slave jumpers when it's time to plug the cables back in? And even with the long IDE cables, snaking them around each other burns those inches in a hurry. Just my opinion.

  221. Re:Cost effective? Let's compare. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Sure. I'd simply have to replace all the disks in the IDE system twelve times over before I'd achieve the cost of the SCSI system.

    Do the SCSI disks last 12x as long?

    And what happens if none of the IDE disks break the bathtub curve (usually hardware fails either very early in it's lifetime or near the end of it)?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  222. Integration + Abit = bad by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm a hardware freak, but I'm personally sick of this integration craze. It's a pain in the fat ass and it drives prices up for nothing.

    I'd rather have a plain-jane board with the plain old ports, no onboard sound/video/lan/raid, but a dozen PCI slots (and two AGP), priced at 99$. Integration is good for your idiot uncle's web-surfing box because he will get all the castrated features he wants for a fraction of the price. Integration is bad for Billco the evil hardware freak because he ends up disabling all the onboard stuff anyway, because it _sucks_.

    Let me tick off the list:

    Onboard sound sucks for many reasons, mainly high CPU usage and poor sound quality.

    Onboard video sucks in terms of speed (they're usually PCI devices), and that shared memory thing is just stupid.

    Onboard Lan is sometimes OK, although in some cases you'll want a high-end adapter for better latency/throughput/wake-on-lan. I don't mind this one being integrated.

    Onboard raid works fine (and saves you a bundle), until you upgrade to a different motherboard. I learned this one too late, as I have an Abit KT7A-raid board (with Highpoint controller). It works great and the speed is excellent, but in a year or two when I upgrade to a DDR-based board, I'll have to spend another 50-60$ extra for the raid option. Had I bought a regular PCI-based Highpoint controller (or just used my old clunky Fasttrak), I could just take it from board to board.

    In all cases though, the worst part about integrated gadgets is the drivers. They're hardly maintained and they're always the source of instability in a system. I'd rather buy a PCI card that does the same work and rely on the actual manufacturer to provide drivers and bugfixes, rather than wait for my motherboard vendor to backport the updates to their BIOS or all-in-one driver set.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  223. Motherboards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the only solution is for some people to set up a new motherboard company run by geeks, for geeks! Maybe it would have to be non-profit and GPL its designs or something during beta stage...

  224. Why oh Why? by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Why do some people say, "This is probably offtopic but," then go on to make extremely interesting, relevent, and useful posts?

    I guess to make up for the idiots who post boring, irrelevent, and useless crap, and then whine at full volume when they're modded down.

    Now, this post is clearly offtopic! Let's see what happens...