Slashdot Mirror


One Million AOL discs to be returned to AOL

nicedream writes "Two guys from California are trying to give AOL a taste of its own medicine. They're asking people to send them AOL discs, and they're going to drop them off at the company's doorstep once they collect 1 million discs. My favorite quote: "We're going to AOL and say, 'You've got mail"." seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours. A million people do *that* and I bet they'd stop filling our mailboxes with the landfill of tomorrow.

654 comments

  1. Old? by no_nicks_available · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember this from a year ago....

    1. Re:Old? by igottheloot · · Score: 5, Funny

      in a related story, all your base are still belong to us.

    2. Re:Old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I remember it from a 'The Register' story earlier today. Slashdot, as usual, just repeats stories from other better news sites.

    3. Re:Old? by grayantimatter · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This is definately old news. Some bad re-hash going on here....

    4. Re:Old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you probably have too much time on your hands. I pity the creeps that actually sit up at all hours of the night looking for double-posts older than a year.

    5. Re:Old? by TheEnglishPatient · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Must be the weather . . . .

      BBC Radio 4 put out a very old story about Micro$oft on the news this morning. You can read about here
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/27688.htm l
      (the Register)

      N

    6. Re:Old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course there are some people who can remember things that happened longer than five minutes ago. Perhaps you should lay off the beer and focus on leaving some brain cells for future use. You should also note that slashdot has a search feature for its old articles.

    7. Re:Old? by s.fontinalis · · Score: 1

      Try about 5 years (the first time I saw their website!)

    8. Re:Old? by destinyland · · Score: 3, Insightful
      CNN is owned by AOL.

      Think about it....

      ---
      Destiny-land.

      The happiest blog on earth.

    9. Re:Old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a news digest...are you just figuring that out now, AC?

    10. Re:Old? by RustyTaco · · Score: 1

      Well, they have too. Those "better news sites" don't allow you the freedom to troll.

      - RustyTaco

    11. Re:Old? by bkocik · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My only question is, how do they plan to get anywhere near the front door of headquarters?

      If you go past the guard shacks without permission, I'm pretty sure you get arrested.

  2. Humanitarian aid by bytesmythe · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems like if they're going to go through that much effort, they should send them to countries where there is a desperate shortage of drink coasters.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
    1. Re:Humanitarian aid by ReverendRyan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or they could sell them to the military... If you throw a cd at someone, it can hurt. And if it hits a wall, it shatters and sends shrapnel everywhere... Imagine if you designed some sort of rubberband-based launcher for it ;)

    2. Re:Humanitarian aid by dirtkilla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I find that CD's really don't make good coasters. That little hole in the middle allows moisture to reach the surface of whatever it's sitting on. Let's rename them from "Coasters" to "Wow put it in the microwave for 5 seconds".

    3. Re:Humanitarian aid by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

      Ok, you've been playing entirely too much Revolution X. ;)

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    4. Re:Humanitarian aid by worthb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My kids have these guns that shoot foam "flying saucer" disks. They are battery powered and use a spinning wheel inside to launch the disks. I'd love to see something like that for cd's!

      --
      "the universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle" - Stapp's Law
    5. Re:Humanitarian aid by co_fisha · · Score: 4, Funny

      I put tape over the little hole. Works great.

    6. Re:Humanitarian aid by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      CDs can be deadly weapons! Remember Hellraiser III?

    7. Re:Humanitarian aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try attaching a CD to a Dremel...

      10000 rpm and set it loose (with a long object).

      FUN FUN as it crashed down the hallway...

      PS Dont do this if you like the appearance of your walls you will have to repaint....

    8. Re:Humanitarian aid by PhxBlue · · Score: 2

      It's probably already occurred to some to try this; but glass weapons are outlawed by the Geneva Convention. Ironically, nukes aren't.

      Though it's hard to say which is worse. I think I'd rather be nuked just once than bombarded with a million AOL CDs.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    9. Re:Humanitarian aid by gorilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      CD's are plastic.

    10. Re:Humanitarian aid by DrMaurer · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of that Dolf Lundgren movie "We Come in Peace," where the bad guy has this gun that shoots this CD like thing and it chops off arms or legs. Yeah, I know, it was magnetically propelled, but still. Maybe there's enough metal in the pressed CDs.

      Anyone else seen this movie?

      Anyone at all?

      Anyone?

      Beuller?

      --
      Dan
    11. Re:Humanitarian aid by screwballicus · · Score: 2

      Also, if you break off a 90-or-so degree piece of the CD, what remains is a section with a hole in the middle for your index finger and a sharp edge pointing outward from either side. Kind of what you'd get if Klingons engaged in thumb wars.

    12. Re:Humanitarian aid by clem · · Score: 4, Funny

      CDs can be deadly weapons! Remember Hellraiser III?

      Regrettably, yes.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    13. Re:Humanitarian aid by Snowdog668 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obligatory User Friendly link:

      http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=2000101 5

      Hey, *I* think it's funny...

      --
      I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
    14. Re:Humanitarian aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't flashing metal objects in a microwave do damage to the appliance itself? A microwave oven sends waves at whatever we put in. The waves are set such that water molecules absorb them very well, changing the radiation energy into heat energy. Metal will absorb microwaves, but it will not change the radiation energy into heat energy. The metal re-emits the radiation energy: very much like visible light reflecting from the metal coating of a mirror. More and more radiation energy is added to the oven, but none gets absorbed. Eventually the amount of radiation energy is great enough to cause sparks to fly, possibly causing a fire. http://newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy00/phy00256.h tm

    15. Re:Humanitarian aid by bytesmythe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, I have. In fact, I think of that movie every time I consider using a CD as a frisbee.

      "I come in peace."
      "You go in pieces."

      Ahhh... classic scriptwriting.

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
    16. Re:Humanitarian aid by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Funny
      CDs can be deadly weapons! Remember Hellraiser III?
      That's nothing next to Neil Diamond!!!
    17. Re:Humanitarian aid by theperplepigg · · Score: 1
      i'd have to agree here. back before buffer overrun protection, i had a collection of about 30 or so "coasters" at one time. they make horrible coasters, though, and if you leave a drink on it too long, the cd can actually stick to your coffee table or wherever, making it much much worse than having no coaster at all. they are fun to microwave, though (don't use your own microwave, use the public dorm microwave or something). also, a friend of mine had his ceiling lined with various coasters (aol, bad burns, very old ms works/office cds, whatever)...flash some strobing colored lights on it, and it looks damn cool. and, of course, you can always sharpen the edges up and use them like ninja stars. good for annoying little sisters, annoying neighbors, and the cat. or start up a league of CD golf. all these uses, and people refer to them by the one option that is the least useful.

      --paul

      --
      -- Every time you kill a kitten, God masturbates.
    18. Re:Humanitarian aid by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2

      Actually CDs which have been laminated make excellent coasters. My roommate's girlfriend printed up a bunch of Anime CD-Rs which we use around the appartment, they work very well.

    19. Re:Humanitarian aid by iceT · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention that the sweat from the glass just puddles up on the CD, and then drips on you when you drink from the glass/can/bottle.

      Now, if we could find a surplus of clock mechanisms, we could send clocks to those poor nations...

      --
      -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
    20. Re:Humanitarian aid by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 1

      Dang AOL! Can't even make good coasters.

    21. Re:Humanitarian aid by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised no one mentioned the game Tribes!

      One of the most used weapons there is the Disk Launcher!

      --
      ^_^
    22. Re:Humanitarian aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CD's what?

    23. Re:Humanitarian aid by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      oh my god. how did this get modded up so high.... do people not know they're plastic? jesus christ. no offense to the original poster, though... you were just correcting the guy... but who the hell would waste mod points on that?

      --
      sig - .
    24. Re:Humanitarian aid by gorilla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm wondering that myself.

    25. Re:Humanitarian aid by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      people as dumb as the person you corrected, I guess. It has already been proven that they exist on slashdot :)

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    26. Re:Humanitarian aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude - about your sig: not clever; not funny.

    27. Re:Humanitarian aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your problem is condensation at the hole in the center, moisture condenses there, and when it evaperates and condenses again it forms a seal between the cd and the sufface of the table.

    28. Re:Humanitarian aid by Surak · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe there's enough metal in the pressed CDs.

      Consider the metal pressed into CDs is aluminum, and therefore not affected by magnets, um, no.

    29. Re:Humanitarian aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But maybe if there was *enough* aluminum.

    30. Re:Humanitarian aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what they call "appropriate technology." Kind of like the hamster powered radios.

    31. Re:Humanitarian aid by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Funny
      That's nothing next to Neil Diamond!!!
      Or Celine Dion.

      Once again, on behalf of all of Canada, I am sorry.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    32. Re:Humanitarian aid by danimrich · · Score: 1

      I remember reading something about the maximum possible speed for CD-ROM drives. Basically, if one would spin the CD at like 50-70x, it would disintegrate, destroying everything around it.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    33. Re:Humanitarian aid by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      Another great use for the AOL CDs is for shooting skeet. A few years back my dad and I went out in the country and decided to shoot some skeet. I brought along 20 or so AOL CDs to see how well it would actually work. It's such a great joy to see AOL CDs blow to pieces thanks to a shotgun. It's good clean geek fun.

    34. Re:Humanitarian aid by Borg#9 · · Score: 1

      I knew someone once who made a gun that fired cd's. It looked like a larger version of the toy that fires little disks. The gun could embed a cd 1/2" - 1" in a wall from 10 feet away.

      --
      Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball
    35. Re:Humanitarian aid by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Not me. Sounds kinda like Oddbit's hat.

      I say we launch 'em all into orbit over Siberia, where they can reflect sunlight down and turn it into a tropical paradise.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    36. Re:Humanitarian aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      "User Friendly...funny"

      You're alone.

    37. Re:Humanitarian aid by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of the pirate ship story and then I recalled a story on the radio about Captain Kidd. Kidd was a bucaneer, and I beleive that he once stole a ship full of china plates. When other bucaneers came looking for Kidd, to collect the bounty placed on him and his ship, he used the china for ammo to shred the sails of the other ship. I'm not sure where this is going, but I just had to say something about it, beeing that there are already about 600+ posts here. Well, anyways I thought it funny, if not off topic. I'm not sure if The History channel is done filming The Ship. Maybe those AOL CD collectors could send them some CDs to fire from their cannon.

    38. Re:Humanitarian aid by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Or the Beatles!!!

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    39. Re:Humanitarian aid by Blkdeath · · Score: 2
      Or the Beatles!!!
      No, sorry, the Beatles didn't come from Canada.
      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    40. Re:Humanitarian aid by evilviper · · Score: 2

      But then you've doubled the cost of your coaster...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    41. Re:Humanitarian aid by n9hmg · · Score: 2

      well, ok... the metal is not affected by magnetic fields, but the electrons in it are. you go whirling a magnetic field around one of those, and the induced currents will make it act like a magnet itself. This is how the speedometer in older american automobiles worked. there was a bar magnet spun by a flexible cable shaft from the output shaft of the transmission, which was thus proportional to wheel speed. This bar magnet sat inside an ALUMINUM cup, which was mounted in a spiral spring, like the balance wheel of a mechanical wristwatch. it created a torque in the cup, proportional to the speed of the magnet, not affected by temperature, humidity, etc..
      It would not be very efficient, especially as a lot of the energy transferred would be thermal (I*I*R) instead of kinetic, but I wonder whether one could get the timing and rates proper to cause the cd to rip itself apart at the same instant that it evaporates, thus creating a low, flat disk of flaming destruction, maybe 10 feet in diameter.

    42. Re:Humanitarian aid by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      is Phtalocyanine carcinogenic?

      We could just build a huge microwave laser...
      and... well .. screw that .. we get some sharks .. with frickin lasers! .. and aim them at a huge pile of cd's ...

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
  3. AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They pay a lot of money to the post office, and this money helps keep the cost of regular mail, that you and I send, cheaper. If AOL stops, and other companies stop, we'll all end up paying more for our mail. So, I say, keep sending the discs!

    1. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But what about what it costs tax payers for landfills? It's a "pay me now or pay me later" situation. And I, for one, would rather pay a little more postage than the alternative.

    2. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It costs a lot less to discard or recycle the discs. They can be melted down and made into other things.

    3. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by AngryPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't say definitively that you are wrong, but I don't think the postal service is a greatly profitable industry. I don't think there is a considerable profit margin for waht they mail. AOL ships these things bulk rate which is a reduction from standard mailing. The labor cost to process all these has to eat up a large portion of what they charge. i don't know... I'm not confident is helps the rest of the US population with postal costs. It does keep more postal workers in jobs, however.

    4. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by krugdm · · Score: 1, Troll

      But if they aren't being sent, then they don't need to be processed through the post office, which would save money and keep costs down as well.

      Plus, with people not signing up for AOL, that's less access to email and more people writing snail mail, so there's your revenue source right back again.

    5. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by pcardoso · · Score: 4, Informative

      but how much more expensive will it get? how often do you use regular mail anyway to offset the inconvenience of having your mailbox full of marketing crap?

      in my country we have some special spam-filter stickers provided by the mail service saying "no unsolicited bulk mail" and it is against the law to drop anything not directly mailed to the mail box recipient. In my building most of the mail boxes have these stickers. Some smartasses still leave something there once in a while, but the amount of trash drops to almost nothing. When I go and check the mail I either have something for me or I don't. No more sorting out useless crap.

      And as mentioned in another post, most of these cds will be buried in a landfill or incinerated. Help the environment, help reduce useless crap.

    6. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by corz · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Postal have gone up more rapidly since AOL started sending these disks out than any other period in time?

    7. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The costs AOL pay cover the costs of the actual sending, PLUS the Post Office makes a profit that they can then use to keep other rates lower.

      People can still get AOL through other means, or another ISP. They advertise on TV quite a bit. Why should the Post Office cut themselves out of the advertising money?

    8. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL gets a highly reduced rate for their bulk mailings. if they paid full price for postage they'd be bankrupt

    9. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correlation does not equal causation, but nice try.

    10. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thats BS.

      Mail was never much more expensive *before* AOL CDs started soming in. If anything it causes more overhead. An increase in volume through the mail system with mail that very vey few people would actually want.

      There would be less overhead if AOL would stop sending out so many CDs. The post office would have that much less to worry about.

      You know what I do everytime I go to the mailbox and there is spam mail in my slot - I stick it in the Outgoing mail slot.

      One time I walked up to the mailbox when the mailman was busy stuffing it full of crap. I asked him if he would please just not put that stuff in my mail box. He said that there is only one way for him to stop putting such mail that is addressed to "So & So OR Current Resident" and other spammings such as the coupon newspapers and pizza offers - get a P.O. Box.

      PMBs are apparently the only thing where there is regulation limiting the unsolicited mailings that are allowed.

    11. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are very incorrect.

      first class letters subsidize the cost of bulk mail.

      the bulk mail rates are incredibly cheap that it costs more to deliver it, thats why postal rates go up.

      the postal rates that are going up are NOT the bulk rates either, just the first class average single bill payment/letter mail.

      so everytime you recieve an AOL disc/Citibank offer, you helped pay for it, by mailing ANYTHING first class

    12. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bulk mail is cheaper because it's pre-processed, but that doesn't mean they don't make a profit off of it.

    13. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a lot" is two words. you wouldn't say "alittle", would you?

    14. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Postal have gone up more rapidly since AOL started sending these disks out than any other period in time?"

      The scientific process in action, folks.

    15. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are losing money, they make it up on first class stamps.

      get over it the post office screws individuals by subsidizing the cost of bulk mail to the first class prices.

    16. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by crawling_chaos · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It depends on how much of the Post Office is tied up in fixed costs. Unfortunately, much of the Post Office's expenses are fixed. Carriers can only cover so much distance, and a small post office still needs to be staffed, even if the mail volume drops by 50%.

      The orignal poster is correct. Bulk mail is about the only thing keeping the price of a First Class stamp under $2.00.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    17. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by suss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah... you wouldn't want to pay a few cents more for your mail to get rid of all this garbage.
      After all, there's probably a spot somewhere that isnt a landfill yet.

      How long does it take for a cd to dissolve anyway?

    18. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and how many people actually recycle them?

    19. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Plutor · · Score: 2

      I dont even remember the last time I sent or received anything (besides spam) by USPS. Things I buy online are sent UPS/FedEx. I pay my bills online. I send email to friends and family (or -- GASP -- call them). The US Postal Service could increase the cost of a stamp to ten trillion dollars for all I care.

    20. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah -- the price of mail has been SO STABLE since AOL started
      sending out those cds a few years ago. Anybody still remember when
      stamps cost less than a quarter???

    21. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by billcopc · · Score: 1

      The reason he can't be stopped from pimping your mailbox full of spam is because the post office gets PAID to do that. When you get a P.O. box, you're PAYING for that box, so they can give you a break because they're making money with you already.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    22. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      Well if it's saving me money in postage rates then atleast make it worth my while and have the CD be blank so I can recycle it. You can put your own CD label on it AOL but also include a blank space for me to write in the label as well. :)

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    23. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh stop it.

    24. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They pay a lot of money to the post office, and this money helps keep the cost of regular mail, that you and I send, cheaper. If AOL stops, and other companies stop, we'll all end up paying more for our mail. So, I say, keep sending the discs!

      Wrong, dumbass. It costs the post office a bundle to sort, handle, and distribute all those discs. I doubt they're taking a loss, but the post office is making less money than they make when people send USEFUL items through the mail.

      DUMBASS!

    25. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Astrorunner · · Score: 2

      Shiiiit. I've had two P.O. boxes and I've received literally 10 times as much crap there than at home. Once a box has been used for a couple years, the address makes its way to quite a few mailing lists :(

    26. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he is right. The US Post Office relies very heavily on bulk mail. Do you think they make more money from your Aunt Tilly's annual Christmas letter or AOL's millions of discs?

    27. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have it backwards moron. You only pay 37 cents for a piece of mail because of the bulk mailings of junk mail. Bulk rate is cheaper because it is presorted. I am also not sure how 37 cents is screwing anybody. I can't even get a cup of coffee for 37 cents.

    28. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzzt...Wrong!

      That would only hold true if the US Postal Service was a for-profit business. However, the USPS gets government subsidies to cover some of the costs of delivering the mail. So the cost of delivering each piece of mail is actually *higher* than the price paid to deliver it. The extra cost comes out of our taxes.

      Therefore, AOL sending millions of CD's is actually costing us tax money and forcing the USPS to raise the price of stamps.

    29. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many morons's like you are going to post this shit. They get cheaper rates because the mail is presorted. In other words it doesn't haven't to go through human hands first like you chicken scratched addressed label does. Why don't you and the other idiots go ask your postman. If you didn't get junkmail your postal rate would be along the same lines as priority mail is now.

    30. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2, Funny

      " "a lot" is two words. you wouldn't say "alittle", would you?"

      Loosen up on the language corrections- go on live alittle !

      graspee

    31. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you are wrong asshole. Bulk mail is cheaper because it is "presorted." In other words the post office doesn't have to sort and handle the mail as much as a regular letter. It also uses bar coded addresses. As for distrubution but last I checked the mailman comes past my house whether he has one piece of mail or ten pieces. There is no incremental cost for that disc. Maybe you should go ask your teacher or mom before you post.

    32. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea how bulk mailings work, do you?

    33. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually the US postal service is nearly break even. They get relatively little money from the tax payers. You can go dig through their site for financial statements but I am too busy right this second to do it. Also he is absolutely right about bulk subsidizing regular mail.

    34. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congress created the Postal Service as a profit-neutral semi-agency/semi-business thing. They are supposed to break even. They can do this by charging for a profit on some services, and losing money on others. They are partially tax-supported, but the eventual goal is to get them totally self-sufficient.

    35. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      They pay a lot of money to the post office, and this money helps keep the cost of regular mail, that you and I send, cheaper.

      Two problems I immediately notice with your theory are as follows:

      1. The more they mail, the more it will cost the PO.
      2. They may get a discount.
      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    36. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this is because mail volume in general has gone down because of e-mail, electronic payments etc. Less volume means less postage but not less mailmen. Therefore you have to increase the price to make up for the lower income since the Post Office operates fairly independant of the Government. What a weird coincidence that e-mail became popular during the same people that AOL started up? Now that belongs on Ripley's.

    37. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      PhysicsGenius, are you posting anonymously now?

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    38. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by dissy · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Funny, AOL has been sending CDs for years and the postal service has also been raising their prices for years as well...

    39. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by KurdtX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, the reason postage is getting more expensive is email. Spammers who used to be dumping millions in to smail can now do so far cheaper over email, so they can send you mail every day for a year for less than it would have cost to send you one smail.

      If you actually think about for a sec before using your gut-level reaction to AOL spam, you would realize that it costs the same amount of money to send a postman to every house no matter how much mail he is carrying (yes, I know...). Without spam, they wouldn't have a reason to come to your house every day, and would likely cut back to say, once a week or whatever depending on how many people are actually sending you stuff. Then if something got in a few minutes after he left, you'd have to wait a full week to get it (would you want to wait that long for your Maxim?) because no one is paying him to come by every day. Honestly, the only time I send stuff in the mail is the holidays (1/year), or to backwater places that don't do electronic commerce (rare), or when my physical signature is required.

      And really, is paying an extra ~20c killing you that much?

      --

      Kurdt
      I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
    40. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lesson for you about Bulk Mail from US Postal Service:

      What Are Bulk Rates?

      The Postal Service offers discounts for bulk mailings because you do some of the work that otherwise would have to be done by the Postal Service (for example, sorting the mail by ZIP Code or transporting the mail to a different postal facility). Everyone benefits from this "worksharing." Mailers make an investment in time and technology, and the Postal Service's costs are reduced and you pay less postage.

      In order to mail at bulk rates, you need to:

      Get a mailing permit (permission to mail) and pay an annual mailing fee.
      Pay postage using one of several convenient methods: precanceled stamps, postage meter, or permit imprint.
      Make smart choices about the size, shape, and weight of your mailpiece.
      Ensure that your addresses are accurate.
      Presort the mailpieces (separate or sort your mail by ZIP Codes).
      Take your mail to the post office where you hold your mailing permit.

      The choices you make can result in significant postage savings. Click here for a discussion about the postage rates you'll pay.

    41. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey sissy. Read the other 10 posts telling you why you are wrong. One even explains why rates have gone up in the time that AOL has been around. Also, please note that posting at +1 is a privledge that should not be wielded lightly. Only post at +1 when you are making an intelligent meaningful statement and not trolling.

    42. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more they mail, the more it will cost the PO.

      And the more income the post office receives. Read the post above about why the get a discount. It is a lot easier for the Post Office to deliver presorted bulk mail then regular mail. The post office for years has been saying how Bulk mail subsidizes regular mail. Without bulk mail why would the mailman come to your house everyday?

    43. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "I don't think there is a considerable profit margin for waht they mail. AOL ships these things bulk rate which is a reduction from standard mailing."

      The more proper term for "bulk rate" nowadays is "presorted," which is why their postage is cheaper than our one-piece first class mailings (they sort so the USPS doesn't have to).

      That's the only break they get (unless they do drop shipments, which involves mailing them from post offices close to the destination). It's the same break you and I could get if we went to our local post offices and paid $150 for a presorted mail permit.

      "The labor cost to process all these has to eat up a large portion of what they charge."

      AOL is doing a good deal of the Postal Service's labor themselves by presorting it. It's called work sharing, which I've heard (but can't confirm) is something unique to the USPS as compared to other post offices.

      "i don't know... I'm not confident is helps the rest of the US population with postal costs."

      The larger the volume of mail to be moved, the more justification the USPS has for faster but more expensive sorting and delivery equipment. The occasional birthday card to your grandmother is not justification for the USPS to invest in high-speed OCR machines, barcode printers, 18-wheel trucks, airplanes, ships, etc. AOL CDs are.

      And as for postage rates, we live in the third largest country in the world and yet we have amongst the lowest postage rates among industrialized nations. Most Europeans, for example, have to pay the equivalent of $0.50 or $0.60 to mail what what we pay $0.37 for. And that $0.37 will get your letter from Puerto Rico to Guam.

      No, I'm not a postal worker, I've just been learning way too much information as I prepare to print up several thousand letters to voters in my district.

    44. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Murrow · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you didn't get junkmail your postal rate would be along the same lines as priority mail is now.

      Documentation please? I've done some google searching and have found no references to real cost analysis numbers regarding this issue.

      I've also heard that the DMA's pet senators have forbidden the Post Office from doing this sort of audit. But, I have been unable to find a reference for this claim too.

      My gut feeling is that the lack of easily available hard numbers means the general public wouldn't like the current situation.

      I've asked this question before in some spam discussions here. Surely someone out there can drive google better than I, or find another resource to get some hard numbers rather than just parroting what they've heard...?
    45. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by handsome+devil · · Score: 1

      can anyone really say that their monthly stamp budget is putting them in the poorhouse? god, i spend probably a total of $3.00 a year on stamps. who cares?

    46. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by ari_j · · Score: 2

      Then why is the cost of stamps a prime number of cents? Why do they always change the price of stamps to make them multiples of the most annoying primes? I hate carrying change, and therefore I try to buy things in dollar increments. How many dollars do I have to spend to come out even on buying stamps? c = $(lcm(100,p)/100) For prime p, gcd(p,100) = 1, that's c = $p. For "annoyingly almost prime" p, gcd(p,100) couldjustaswellequal 1, it's not much better. (34-cent stamps --> c = $17) Why can't we go back to 25-cent stamps, which give c = $1? Or even 50-cent stamps, for that matter. Or at least multiples of 5, for crying out loud!

    47. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An intelligent, well-researched, and properly spelled post. I would vote for you just based on that.

    48. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well common sense can be your guide also. Think of it this way. How much regular stamped mail do you get? Maybe one or two pieces a week? Now do you think that the post office could send the mailmen to your house everyday if they only made 74 cents a week on you? They rely on companies like AOL to spend millions of dollars to send out presorted, bar-coded mail to you. The most labor intensive part of postal work is the sorting. Read some of the other posts here for more enlightment.

    49. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is 32 and 34 prime numbers? Would you rather the post office go from 25 to 50? Do you really buy stamps individually anyway? I usually buy mine in a book.

    50. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly the post office actually loses money every year. If AOL stops shipping their discs then the post office will lose less money, which is a good thing.

    51. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by ezraj · · Score: 4, Informative

      Our town recycles CDs, and you can, too, through greendisk.com.

    52. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Murrow · · Score: 1
      How many houses could a single delivery person serve if he only had to stop twice a week at each house to deliver a single 37 cent envelope?

      I average a bill a day, a magazine a week, a couple professional related newsletters a week, plus monthly statements from my IRA, my 401K, my bank account, etc. My wife gets a similar volume. Much of this may be sent bulk rate, but none of it is junk. I easily get twice as much noise as I do signal. (We've been in our house just over a year... you should see the volumes that my parents get after 30 years in the same house).

      The most labor intensive part of postal work is the sorting.

      When the driver pulls up at my house he only stops briefly because he has all my mail already in one bundle. That means that he has spent the time to break open that stack of AOL discs and distribute them to everyone's bundles (do they still use large pigeon holes for this level of sorting?) Then he has to do the same with the Earthlink discs, and the MSN discs, and the occasional real mail. I don't see any difference in the processing time for my local delivery person.

      Read some of the other posts here for more enlightment.

      I've read the rest of the discussion here. Proof through assertion doesn't impress me.

    53. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Informative
      "Mail was never much more expensive *before* AOL CDs started soming in."

      Perhaps, but I doubt you can argue against the idea that AOL CDs help keep postage rates low. Why else are we able to send an ounce at $0.37 when the average European has to pay closer to $0.60? For mail within a country not much larger than a typical US state?

      Economy of scale is a wonderful thing.

      "If anything it causes more overhead."

      A million AOL CDs mailed at once causes less overhead than a million people sending a greeting card. In order for AOL to take advantage of presorted mail rates, they have to presort their mail. Part of the $0.37 we pay for a first class mail stamp pays for sorting and barcoding as well as delivery, while AOL does most their own sorting and barcoding, mailing the CDs already sorted in their own trays.

      A single CD mailed at first class rates:
      $0.37

      A single CD mailed at presorted rate (which doesn't automatically include features built into first class like "return to sender" or "forward to new address" and doesn't require the stamps to be cancelled as with first class), presorted by area distribution center (pretty much the first two digits of the ZIP code):
      $0.268

      Same as above, only sorted by first three digits of ZIP code:
      $0.248

      Sorted by area distribution center, pre-barcoded and address electronically verified:
      $0.219

      And the prices keep on dropping as AOL does more and more of the labor themselves, all the way down to $0.12 if AOL
      1. sorts by carrier route (ZIP+4, more or less)
      2. verifies the existence of all addresses electronically
      3. barcodes the addresses themselves
      4. mails a copy of the mailing to each and every address on the carrier routes ("postal patron" means they don't have to figure out which boxes get one and which don't)
      5. inserts the CDs into the mail stream at the destination post offices themselves
      Now, then, who has more overhead?

      "An increase in volume through the mail system with mail that very vey few people would actually want."

      An increase that justifies the USPS paying for faster (but more expensive) sorting and delivery equipment. If the only people sending mail were the average person sending a single letter or card a week, there wouldn't be any reason (or money) for the USPS to do anything but manual sorting.

      "I asked him if he would please just not put that stuff in my mail box. He said... get a PO Box"

      What were you expecting? Guess what: the cost of delivering advertising to your mailbox is 100% paid for (by law) by the sender. This isn't e-mail we're talking about here. If the disagreement is between you and the sender, and the sender is the only paying customer between the both of you, why should any business listen to anybody but the person paying them money?

      No, I'm not a postal employee, I'm just learning this as I prepare to send out 11,400+ letters to some of the voters in my district.
    54. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Read my entire comment, you illiterate son of a bitch. 37, the current price, is very much a prime number. 32 and 34 share only 2 and 1 of 100's prime divisors, respectively, and are thus annoying. And yes, I'd rather the post office go from 25 to 50. Or at least to 30, 35, 40, 45, and then 50. I do happen to buy individual stamps, indeed, and rarely buy more than 2 at a time, mostly because I usually send things certified mail anyhow, and stamps are no good for that.

    55. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

      That's either trolling at its finest or /. readers *and* moderators don't have a shadow of a sense of humor.

      C'mon people, the parent must be +x Funny, it's not to be taken seriously - gosh, look at all the replies...

    56. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Funny
      Correlation does not equal causation, but nice try.

      Maybe he works for the RIAA?

    57. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Murrow · · Score: 1

      How much regular stamped mail do you get? Maybe one or two pieces a week? Now do you think that the post office could send the mailmen to your house everyday if they only made 74 cents a week on you?

      Try reversing this. What would it cost AOL to fund a postal service whose only job was to deliver their AOL disks? Bet its more than they're paying now! So "obviously" our first class stamps are subsidizing them.

      Oh, or is this perhaps too complex an issue for "common sense" to clarify. Do we perhaps need real numbers and a real audit to understand all the different fixed and variable costs?

    58. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Dudio · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of data available at here, including audited quarterly and annual financial statements and Revenue, Pieces and Weight reports, which provide statistics for revenue, total weight and number of pieces for every class and subclass of mail. Someone with the time and interest should be able to put together an interesting analysis of the situation based on this data. Unfortunately, I am not that person, so you're on your own.

      However, I will engage in a bit of largely unsubstantiated conjecture. Take a look at the discussion in this part (pdf) of the 2001 annual report. Note how they point out that 1.7 million new addresses were introduced over the year, and go on to mention costs associated with servicing these new addresses ($600 million a year for new facility space alone). They also mention that falling volume makes it more difficult to meet the costs of the increasing network of addresses. This suggests that at current volume, USPS costs are predominately fixed costs, meaning that volume increases have a net positive effect on profitability.

      Overall, what I get from this is that the fixed costs largely derive from the size of the network of deliverable addresses, and regular first-class mail and bulk mail each contribute more or less equally towards those fixed costs relative to volume. This means that no side is subsidizing the other; it's really a symbiotic relationship in which costs are reduced for all sides by the existence of a shared delivery network.

    59. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would seem like a troll if it weren't true. Junk mail is why the mailman comes to your door every day and why you can send letters from Florida to Alaska for 37 cents.

    60. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No

    61. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are assuming that the Post Office loses money every year on Bulk Mail specifically. The truth is that is where they make their money. AOL does all of the work and the Post Office just puts it in a bag and delivers it where they weer going anyway. AOL and other junk mail senders stop and the post will lose less money only after raising stamp prices to $2.

    62. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did read your comment and your complaint really has nothing to do with prime numbers. You just want stamp prices to be a multiple of 5. It is not me that is illiterate, it is you that sucks at math.

    63. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try reversing this. What would it cost AOL to fund a postal service whose only job was to deliver their AOL disks? Bet its more than they're paying now! So "obviously" our first class stamps are subsidizing them.

      That might be the worst counter argument ever. Of course it would cost AOL more but that doesn't prove anything. It would still cost them a lot less per piece for them to send out their bulk mailing then it would be for me to send out my one piece of mail. I am not sure what part is not getting through to you since to me it is pretty simple. AOL is doing some of the work of the post office (sorting and verifying addresses) and therefore is getting a price discount. I think perhap you read too many of those postal service conspiracy sites. Here's a hint for you. Most of those guys haven't a clue what they are talking about. Read some of the posts from the guy running for Congress.

    64. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many houses could a single delivery person serve if he only had to stop twice a week at each house to deliver a single 37 cent envelope?

      The same amount as he would if he had ten envelope to deliver. The mailman has a route. He has to go by your house whether you have mail or not. Did you ever wonder what that flag on your mailbox is for? That's to tell the mailman you don't have any outgoing mail. He has drive by the mailbox to see that. As long as he sticks to that route it will take just as long whether he is delivering you one piece or ten.

      When the driver pulls up at my house he only stops briefly because he has all my mail already in one bundle.

      Not all post offices do that. Mine for one doesn't. I think that is a matter of your mailman and post office. Either way, the sorting at the end is paid for by AOL's postage. If they didn't want to pay for that they could just put Resident and have it go to everybody.

      Then he has to do the same with the Earthlink discs, and the MSN discs, and the occasional real mail. I don't see any difference in the processing time for my local delivery person.

      Exactly, it takes him just as long to do your mail whether you got disks from AOL or not. Was this a realization on your part at the end?

    65. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by LafinJack · · Score: 1

      No offense, but based on "candidate information" I've recieved in the past (especially for the current election going on), that stuff isn't any better than AOL discs content-wise. :)

      --
      we are building a religion
      a limited edition
      we are now accepting callers
      for these pendant key chains
    66. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Dudio · · Score: 1

      I don't see any difference in the processing time for my local delivery person.

      But that's only one small piece of the sortation that is required to provide end-to-end postal delivery service. The postal system is a hierarchical structure of large regional sortation/distribution facilities and local post offices, with an intermediate level or two (e.g. primary post office for a city/large neighborhood/whatever). Mail entering the system gets sorted at each level on its way up to a regional facility (sorry for the lack of correct terminology - it's been a few years since I worked with direct mail people). At the regional facility, it is sorted in order to route it to the correct peer-level facility, and then it gets sorted again at every level on the way down to the destination local post office. The mail carrier who owns the route to which the destination address belongs has his workload increased according to the volume on his route, but he is merely the last step of a huge sortation and distribution system.

    67. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some advice for you. Don't go to your local train station and hand out flyers and shake hands in the morning. I had some guy running for State Supreme Court this morning and it is just plain annoying. I don't want to shake your hand and I don't want your pamphlet. I just want to get on my train and head to work. I also have to say that 99.9% of these guys are Democrats. I am not sure if that is because I live in a heavily Republican area (and thus Democrats need to work the streets) or if Democrats are just scoping out potential "interns."

    68. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, their shit is pre-sorted. My letter to Aunt Tilly is pre-sorted, too.

    69. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by ari_j · · Score: 1

      When did I ever claim that anything other than 37 is prime? As to my complaint: it's about the divisibility of a whole number of dollars by the price of a stamp, which is entirely based on which prime numbers are divisors of 100 and the price of a stamp. Go ask your local high school if you can sit in on an Algebra class or something, and then check out their offerings in English grammar, because you're lacking in both areas pretty severely here.

    70. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Bizaff · · Score: 1

      Because the board that sets the cost of USPS postage (which is not made up of USPS employees, btw) probably thinks (correctly) that it's more of a pain for Joe Schmo to go buy A stamp when it's not a round number of cents.

      I hate stuff that sucks.

    71. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 seconds. Haven't you seen the microwave trick?

    72. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by len_harms · · Score: 1

      However that argument that it scales is inane. Here is why. It takes people to put that junk in my box. 'Well he is coming by anyway'. Not necessarily. Here is why. I have seen MANY times when I have no mail (it does happen) the driver just drives on by my house. Instead of 30 seconds in front of my house fiddling with the box and his car window. No work was done for me other than (hmm none for him). No sorting. No shipping. No routing. No dropping off. Nada. People cost money.

      This is a goverment service. Not a busness. It should be minimum scale. It should serve the public. Instead it is trying to make itself bigger. Which is not what Economy of scale is about. You make yourself bigger so you can do more, and cost less, and pass the savings onto your customer. However with your view of economy of scale it is you get bigger and now you can charge more. The rate went UP remember.

      If a driver had 3 houses out of a hundred to deliver to would he stop at all hundred? No he would wizz by and hit the 3. But with most bulk mailings it hits ALL 100 houses. Plus a couple extras, that are not sorted right (my house gets all the extras). So now what took a half hour to do now takes 2 hours.

      Scale that out to a whole town. Suddenly you MUST hire more people just to get to all the houses in 1 day. Not to mention the sorting that happens at the dock even if it is presorted down to the neighborhood. The driver then has to spend even MORE time digging out of 2 or more boxes of mail instead of 1.

      Also IF you look at the rates you can see it specificaly set up to HELP companies and not the little guy. The little guy is what the system is FOR. Not to cut a break for people willing to do some of the leg work. That sorting machines do already...

      In the past 2 weeks I have got 5 letters that were for me that were bills. The rest of the PILE was junk mail. I didnt pay for it I dont want it. All I do is throw it away. I dont even read it. Why send it to me? How is this helping me? How many people throw it out? How much landfill (of which is always filling up) does this waste? Oh yes this is good for the comunity.

      Probably my most favorite advertisment is inside my bills. Great not only do I own you money you are trying to soak me for more with some junk I dont want (TRASH).

    73. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Guppy06 · · Score: 2
      "It takes people to put that junk in my box."

      Your NIC has to decide whether a particular frame on the wire is going to your node or not. Does the fact that no frames are going to your particular node at this exact time make the job of a core router appreciably easier?

      The "economy of scale" comes through in the fact that it's cheaper for the USPS to send your mail guy to your address even when he has no mail than it is to send him out on special trips to your address only when there is mail. Talking about the "30 seconds wasted" is like talking about the extra electricity your computer has to use to read the MAC on a frame that isn't destined for your computer.

      "No work was done for me other than (hmm none for him)."

      And he's the only one working on getting mail to your mailbox?

      The economy of scale comes into play in the fact that, while there may not be mail for you, there is always mail going to your zone, always mail going to your ZIP code, always mail going to your street, etc... If something is going to you, it gets tossed onto a truck that is already going in your direction anyway. They don't have to pay the extra money involved in a "special trip" to your mailbox. A good metaphor is taking the bus instead of a taxi.

      Back to the networking analogy, they can keep your network in the route cache instead of having to go through a labor-intensive route table look-up.

      "This is a goverment service. Not a busness."

      It's been closer to the other way around since the 1970's or so. Postage moves your mail, not taxes.

      "It should be minimum scale. It should serve the public."

      Make up your mind. Small scale, or a scale large enough to be useful to the public?

      "The rate went UP remember."

      So has inflation and the price of gas. What's your point? We still have among the lowest postage rates in the industrialized world.

      In the US, $0.37 will move a one ounce letter from any US address to any US address. $0.37 from San Juan to Guam. $0.37 from Point Barrow to Pago Pago. And that's before we get into APO/FPO addresses.

      In Austria, as an example, a 20 gram (0.71 oz.) letter costs the equivalent of $0.50. That will get your letter from Austria to... Austria. Alright, it will also get you to other European countries, but it certainly won't move your letter through different hemispheres.

      An airmail letter from the US to Austria costs $0.80. An airmail letter from Austria to the US costs the equivalent of $1.06.

      " If a driver had 3 houses out of a hundred to deliver to would he stop at all hundred? No he would wizz by and hit the 3"

      If a driver only had 3 houses out of a hundred for days or weeks, would he bother going out every day, or would he wait until he had a decent amount? He keeps going out every day because it's usually more like 97 houses out of 100 that have mail.

      Economy of scale: There is enough mail that it is cheaper for them to maintain a regularly scheduled route than to make repeated "special trips."

      "So now what took a half hour to do now takes 2 hours."

      You assume he'd still be coming out every day as opposed to cutting back to weekly or bi-monthly trips.

      "Scale that out to a whole town. Suddenly you MUST hire more people just to get to all the houses in 1 day."

      And the postage from all those mailings mean suddenly you can afford to hire people to go to all those houses each and every day. If you want to mail something out, you can put it in your curbside mailbox and know it will be picked up today instead of "some time next week."

      "Not to mention the sorting that happens at the dock even if it is presorted down to the neighborhood."

      The stuff I'll be sending out Monday is sorted down to the carrier route. The letters in each carrier route are in the exact order the delivery person drives past the addresses. That's why I'll be paying $0.139 for each of those mailings instead of $0.164. If it's being sorted at the dock, that sorting has been paid for in the postage.

      Besides, why sort at the dock when the volume of mailings lets you afford high-speed OCR equipment to sort the mail at centrallized facilities before it even gets to its destination? Even back when OCR was an "emerging technology?"

      "Also IF you look at the rates you can see it specificaly set up to HELP companies and not the little guy."

      They're there to help anybody and everybody who happens to mail out more than 200 things at one time (a limit that makes having customers do their own pre-sorting worth the effort). There's no difference between the fees paid by the individual and the corporation. If anybody is being helped by the rates, it's the non-profit organizations that get very preferential pricing. Which wouldn't happen if the USPS couldn't afford to give them a break, which brings us back to "economy of scale."

      If you want to compare apples to apples, pre-sorted first class mail (which requires mailings of 500+) saves a "whopping" 1.8 cents per letter or post card.

      "That sorting machines do already..."

      You missed it by a mile.
      1. Sorting machines cost money and consume time (and time=money).
      2. It costs USPS money to sort mail.
      3. Money is paid for by postage.
      4. Mailer X does his own sorting.
      5. USPS saves money by not sorting presorted mail.
      6. Money is saved, passed on to Mailer X through lower postage.
      The USPS sorting machines are there for the little guy who can't be bothered to sort their own mail and/or don't have the time and resources to do his own sorting.

      "Why send it to me?"

      A broadcast is easier (cheaper) to do than a multicast.

      "How is this helping me?"

      It pays for the sorting machines the "little guy" uses without having to use them.

      "How much landfill (of which is always filling up) does this waste?"

      Depends on local recycling programs.

      When you buy something made from recycled paper, it usually says "X% recycled content, Y% post-consumer content." X-Y (which is usually bigger than Y) comes from non-consumer sources, like the USPS eliminating presorted standard mail that can't be delivered.

      Oh, by the way, your bills by law must be mailed at the higher first class rates. They're getting that miniscule 1.8 cent savings I mentioned earlier.
    74. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i say use e-mail

    75. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      At one time the USPS was #6 (in revenues) for all companies, just below Ford, GM and Exxon et.al.

    76. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by delphi125 · · Score: 3, Informative
      the average European has to pay closer to $0.60

      Where on earth do you get your information? The Euro is close to the dollar (1 USD = 1.02933 EUR), and in Holland stamps cost 0.39; virtually the same as in the USA. A sample from http://www.atms.ch/rates/: GB 27p (about 43 cents), Ireland 0.41, Belgium 0.42, Greece 0.45, France 0.46, Germany 0.56, Italy 0.62 (but 0.41 available), Spain 0.25, Portugal 0.27 normal (but 0.43 available, Azul is express I expect).

    77. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by pyite · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've been alive for 17 years and gas prices have steadily risen for the past 17 years.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    78. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      WOW. what an incredibly long, pointless argument. is everyone's ego that big? wait, these are computer geeks I'm talking about. (I post as AC because, like a true computer geek, I am too lazy to register.) according to this link (that's usps.custhelp.com):
      Question

      Does First-Class Mail still subsidize junk mail?

      Answer

      We don't use the "J-word." If you are asking does First-Class Mail subsidize advertising mail, the answer is no. It never has, and it can't by law. Each class of mail pays its own way.

      that answers both sides of the subsidizing question, from the source that knows best. you can question whether or not this is completely truthful, and you can (continue to) debate whether or not our own personal first-class letters are delivered faster for the new technology afforded by the increase in volume due to bulk unsolicited commercial mail. maybe it costs a little less to deliver your letter faster. but as one poster said, you pay for it eventually. think of the impact on the environment. it costs money to recycle, people. not like the vast majority of these CDs (or other pieces of junk mail) are being recycled. even if they were, and even if AOL Time Warner were paying for it, that is no substitute for conservation. Reduce; when you can't do that, reuse; when you can't do that, recycle.

      "We are in a great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate. Either is in such a predicament as the man who was earnest to be introduced to a distinguished deaf woman, but when he was presented, and one end of her ear trumpet was put into his hand, had nothing to say. As if the main object were to talk fast and not to talk sensibly." -- Henry David Thoreau, Walden

    79. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and spammers pay a lot of money for their internet accounts, helping to keep the cost of your account down.

      (Pause)

      Now, wait a minute....

    80. Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money by len_harms · · Score: 1


      Your NIC has to decide whether a particular frame on the wire is going to your node or not. Does the fact that no frames are going to your particular node at this exact time make the job of a core router appreciably easier?

      Actually yes it does. Less trafic means LESS work for the router. And there is no 1 router in the list. There are usually 20-30 routers involved. That means OTHER trafic can get through more efficiently. This is why denal of service attacks are so effective. You can swamp out real useful trafic with bogus traffic. Even route lookuptables COST. Everything has a cost. There is no FREE.

      The NIC card in your example is more like the local mail office. The OS is me. If my OS is not worying about extra junk (the nic card snags it and doesnt tell the os), then it does not take away from my tasks at hand.


      And he's the only one working on getting mail to your mailbox?

      At the moment he is sitting with his little whitemobile in front of my house. YES he is the ONLY person working on getting the mail to me. You are confusing economy of scale with delegation of work.

      Economy of scale is the fact that if I BUILD 1000 items it may (not neccesarily) cost less than if I build 1000 1 off's. That a postal delivery system is able TO scale is not economy of scale. The postal system MUST grow in order for you to move more volume given NO technological advances. Growth = People. People = Money. Money has to come from somewhere. It comes from stamps. Stamps cost me and everyone else money. Let me use your network example again. Lets say I want to move a 20 meg file now. But before I was moving a 10 meg file. But I want it in the same amount of time. In order to do that I will need more hardware. That cost money. Also in Econ terms the network is a one time fixed cost. However the dude to run the network and make sure it works thats a recurring cost. The people to deliver mail is a recurring cost. Minimizing recurring costs is a good way to get that economy of scale you talk about. But in order to move volume you MUST have more people to move the stuff.

      Make up your mind. Small scale, or a scale large enough to be useful to the public?

      Why can it not be BOTH usefull and small? Does goverment have to be LARGE in order to be usefull?

      So has inflation and the price of gas. What's your point? We still have among the lowest postage rates in the industrialized world

      Yet the rate did not go up at the same rate as inflation. It went beyond it. Unless the inflation rate was 9%? Also I was not compairing to other countries. We are not THEM. Why do we always compair ourselves to them? Sure it may not be fair to them. But they need to talk to their goverments about that...

      If a driver only had 3 houses out of a hundred for days or weeks, would he bother going out every day, or would he wait until he had a decent amount? He keeps going out every day because it's usually more like 97 houses out of 100 that have mail.

      EXACTLY what I was talking about. But most of those 97 will be what the recipients call junk. Now if he was making 'special' trip for a neighborhood. He would probably be staggering it with other neighborhoods. Yet if he must stop at every house. They will have to put in a driver to get the OTHER neighborhood. The reason they drive by everyday is not because they are being nice. It is because if they dont get rid of it it piles up. LARGE amounts of it. They MUST get rid of it because they do not have the room to store it for any length of time. The only way they can get rid of it is to deliver it. If there was less they could hold more.

      Take for example the mail I got this week. 2 were things I needed (finacial, bills, ect). 6 were junk. Thats fairly typical. That means junk is outpacing useless by 300% this week.


      If you want to mail something out, you can put it in your curbside mailbox and know it will be picked up today instead of "some time next week."

      That is mearly a 'perk' of the fact they must drive by everyday to deliver large amounts of junk. Oh and great we get to hire another person. That means more money to pay that person with. Get enough of that 'we will just raise the rates again, hell with em' mentality. If you want a letter to go out today put it in a blue box. Learned that from my Uncle who works for the postal service. Why? It is not sorted at the local office. Its straight into the main local sorting center and straight to the next main sorting center by semi truck (MCA). If you put it in your mail box it will take an extra 2 days to get there. 1 day for pickup and 1 day for the sort that happens at the local office. Just putting the WHOLE zip code goes a long way also. Not just the 6 diget. The OCR can put it in the right local route faster. Instead of having a person that must look at it.

      saves a "whopping" 1.8 cents per letter or post card

      Apparently you dont consider that saved money. you consider it wasted money. With the rates as they are it would be cheeper at 500 not to sort them. It would cost you more than 5 dollars to sort them before hand. There is a difference when you start to talk 50000. You can pay a guy 100 bucks to sort it all and a corp would 'save' 400 bucks. Yet how does that help the normal guy like me? Who does a letter once and awhile. You say its subsidized. I say the system is self serving.

      Lets say I do 10 bills a month. The rate went up 3 cents. That is an extra 30 cents a month. And 3.60 per year. For me thats NOTHING. But for some people that is a whole meal or two for their family. The rate does not help the little guy.

      You missed it by a mile

      OH?
      1) A sorting machine can sort THOUSANDS of letters per hour. It does not get tired it does not sleep. It is always running. It cost aloooot less than a few hundred people that are sorting mail. They have them, fixed cost, done. They cost TONS less than people sorting mail. That is why they have em. The sorting machine is a fixed cost. Its costs will not rise or fall dramaticly. If the machine is costing more than people to sort. Unplug the thing and hire people in its place. If the ROI on that machine is not going to be there why was it purchased?
      2) They have these machines because usefull mail is outpacing junk mail by 300% at this household.
      3) Yes a tax. Tax's for many years were judged by the tax stamp. These days we call them stamps. A goverment stamp of aproval as it were. The 'newer' type taxs are just garnished right out of your check and you dont miss them (different story).
      4) So? He does this to take advantage of a rate scale. He would be stupid not to.
      5) USPS saves money. HA. They have set up a system that is self fullfilling. If you make the rate to send out advertisments cheaper. If you do a bit of leg work up front. You will save yourself some work. But you will end up delivering MORE things then you were before. They will then JUSTIFY rasing rates because volume has increased.
      6) The ONLY person in this deal that saves money is the person pre sorting large mailings. Again you need larger machines and more people to deal with this sort of thing. Sure its 'easier' to do but it creates MORE volume.
      7) The cd thing that AOL was doing from the 'parent' can NOT be sorted by machine because they use odd shaped mail. It must be handled by hand the whole way. Even IF they presort.

      A broadcast is easier (cheaper) to do than a multicast.

      To whom? To the sender maybe. Let me take your example to the email world. You send a email to 10000 people. Lets say .5% care. You have just wasted 9950 peoples time. You have also snorked 9950 peoples bw and wasted their money (time = money your 1 from above).

      You dont think for one second that people like getting this stuff do you?

      It pays for the sorting machines the "little guy" uses without having to use them

      The sorting machines are only in the bulk centers. They were paid for years ago. Their ongoing cost can not be THAT much. Your saying that a machine (or series of them) that let say sorts 10000 letters per hour costs an additional 3 cents per letter to sort. Or that the cost of that machine went up 300 dollars PER hour. Lets say of that 1 cent was sorting. Then it went up 100 dollars an hour. or 2400 dollars PER day. Just for that one machine.

      Depends on local recycling programs

      Your assuming everyone recycles. Your second assumption there IS a recycling system. Your third assumption is that the system takes junk mail. Mine does not. Newsprint, cans, bottles, 2-litter jugs, milk jugs ONLY. Any other sort of print gets tagged as extra and the recycler charges back to the local municipality that is running it for having to throw it out.

      They're getting that miniscule 1.8 cent savings I mentioned earlier

      I guess you consider saved money a waste of time. Just because it is 1.8 cents.

      The real problem is if you give a person a budget of 10000 this year, and they spend 9000 of it this year. Then give them a budget of 9000 the next year because of what they spent last year is self destructive. They will then overspend the year after that. Even though they only needed 9000. They will spend the 10000 to justify it. But after awhile they will NEED that 10000. But they are used to overspending so now they overspend what they were already overspending. So now they need 11000. Yet they could have gotten by with 9000 in the first place.

      like the USPS eliminating presorted standard mail that can't be delivered

      oh goodie another burden to take care of. So now not only do you have mail to deliver that no one really wants. You have mail that can not be delivered. So now you have to hire people JUST to pull that junk out and make sure its recycled (by law).

      IF however my rant doesnt convince you let your own words do it
      spam stuff

  4. Slogan for these guys by Johnso · · Score: 1

    You've got too much time on your hands.

    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    1. Re:Slogan for these guys by Stackis · · Score: 1
      "Too much time on your hands"

      Sounds like an old Styx song :)

      --

      "Look where we worship" -- Jim Morrison
  5. What a waste of effort! by wcbrown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ooo, that's really going to hurt AOL. I bet these guys get arrested for littering or AOL refuses the package.

    Or maybe AOL will rethink its number one marketing ploy (ubiquity) and go to something more subdued. Uh huh.

  6. I called them by Therlin · · Score: 5, Informative

    I called AOL and asked them to take me off their mailing list. They thought it was an odd request, and the agent didn't know what to do at first. After being put on hold for a couple of minutes they got down my information and told me that they'd take me off their list.

    To this day I have yet to receive an AOL CD in my mailbox.

    1. Re:I called them by mgessner · · Score: 5, Interesting

      On a somewhat related note, my Dad simply writes on the outside of the AOL disk mailer:

      "REFUSED DELIVERY - PLEASE REMOVE FROM MAILING LIST"

      AFAIK he has yet to receive another disk from AOL (he was getting several a *month* at one time).

      He's also dramatically cut down on the number of amount of other junk mail he gets.

      --
      "Sometimes the truth is stupid." - Lawrence, creator of Prime Intellect
    2. Re:I called them by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      So you've been missing out on all the free DVD cases? bummer.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    3. Re:I called them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      my favorite is "moved, no forwarding address"

      works well with telemarketers too, just tell them you just had the phone installed. (ie the number has been recycled already)

    4. Re:I called them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! AOL told me they couldn't take me off of their list, but they eventually did. PLEASE good people, this is only a small part of the junk mail problem. Return every business reply envelope that is mailed to you and call all the toll-free numbers on your junk mail asking to be removed from their list. If enough people did that, we would have less junk mail in our mailboxes. Thank you.

    5. Re:I called them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, ask them to wait a second while you describe in detail how they interrupted you in the bathroom while you were wiping your ass. They don't call back if they think you're a psycho sicko

    6. Re:I called them by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better than that - "cannot deliver - recipient deceased".

      A friend of mine in college wrote that on a letter he got from a pseudo-ex-girlfriend (pseudo because she was never actually dating him - just playing mind games).

    7. Re:I called them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the point of this is that you get removed from their database though. now when they sell that list to other telemarketers, your phone number is absent

    8. Re:I called them by vondo · · Score: 2

      The DVD cases are nice, but how do I get the adhesive from their stickers off?

      Recently mine have been coming in the tin boxes though. I don't know what to do with those.

    9. Re:I called them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than that - just throw it away.

    10. Re:I called them by TheEnglishPatient · · Score: 1

      In the UK you can get a solvent called "Sticky Stuff Remover" (also known as orange solvent by dentists 'cos that's what it smells like)
      N

    11. Re:I called them by macom · · Score: 1
      decapped for lameness filter ...."refused delivery - please remove form mailing list"

      I write "DECEASED" on junk mail and return it.

      omico--

    12. Re:I called them by JPelorat · · Score: 2

      Hot water (and/or soap) might do it.. I don't bother taking off the stickers... I use em to replace the crappy cases that EBGames puts their used Xbox games in, so it's not covering up a game title or anything.

      And the tin boxes make nice shooting targets, they don't shatter like the CDs.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    13. Re:I called them by 95_gst_al · · Score: 2, Funny

      im sure that works, but then they will resort to putting them in the bottom of your kids happy meal. look mommy/daddy i got a different colored flying saucer this time. its has the AOL 137.0 eninge this week.

      --
      When all else fails, piss on it. At least you will feel better in some kind of way.
    14. Re:I called them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    15. Re:I called them by leviramsey · · Score: 0, Troll

      That reminds me of the time I got a letter which said "Darling, I love you and I cannot live without you. Marry me or I will kill myself." I was a bit taken aback, until I checked the envelope. It was addressed to "Occupant".

    16. Re:I called them by Maxwell_E · · Score: 3, Insightful

      *koff* Tom Lehrer *koff*rippoff*koff*.

    17. Re:I called them by portnoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, if you're going to quote Tom Lehrer, you can at least say you're quoting Tom Lehrer.

    18. Re:I called them by mandelbaum · · Score: 5, Informative

      AOL CD's are sent presort standard and if you write refused/deceased/etc. on it and put it back in your mailbox, it will get recycled by the post office. I'm a letter carrier. No junk mail ever gets returned to the sender. See:

      http://pe.usps.gov/text/qsg/q015.htm

      Unless it has an endorsement, it's getting tossed.

      -aaron

    19. Re:I called them by GoRK · · Score: 2

      After you spend all that time to get the stickers off of it, you might want to consider that if you want to buy the same DVD cases, you can get them for 10 to 30 cents each...

    20. Re:I called them by Lepruhkawn · · Score: 2
      she was never actually dating him - just playing mind games

      When you are getting "good signs" from a female that you are interested in, remember that there is only ONE good sign: full frontal nudity.
      --
      Jesus saves....And takes 1/2 damage.
    21. Re:I called them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, thanks for the info, that's helpful to know. I actually LEARNED something in a slashdot comment for once. :)

    22. Re:I called them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GooGone is the shit.

    23. Re:I called them by cel4145 · · Score: 1

      this seems a better solution than the one then sending all the cd's to this guy. if one million people called aol in the next six months to be removed from their mailing lists, well, they'd definitely get the message :)

    24. Re:I called them by Denial+of+Cervix · · Score: 3, Interesting
      AOL CD's are sent presort standard and if you write refused/deceased/etc. on it and put it back in your mailbox, it will get recycled by the post office. I'm a letter carrier.

      I'm a recovering letter carrier... I recall seeing clerks at the carrier station spending hours recycling undeliverable AOL disks. Because the USPS has mandatory recycling for all UBBM (Undeliverable Bulk Business Mail - junk mail to endusers), someone gets to make $17/hour tearing the plastic shrinkwrap open, recycling the paper and discarding the disk and shrinkwrap. I swear the USPS must lose money on handling these things, especially as they're not easily automatable, unlike letter mail, which is sorted - with OCR - at 40-60,000 pieces per hour in one machine.

      DoC
      In almost seven years as a carrier, I wasn't bitten once. By a dog, anyway.

    25. Re:I called them by Wakkow · · Score: 2

      They just take them and include it in "Change of Address Confirmation" mailer. If you don't believe me, go move and change your address. You'll see what I mean.

    26. Re:I called them by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      not all discs come straight from aol, i'm always getting them with orders from MCM

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    27. Re:I called them by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      My reading of that piece indicates that you could get a "Return Service Requested" stamp, stamp that on the AOL CD, and then it would go back to them?

      I'm sure that it's probably illegal for one reason or another, but would this work?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    28. Re:I called them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ashtrays?

      candle wax runoff holders/protectrs?

      Coasters

  7. Wonderful by jhunsake · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I'm sure AOL won't give a damn. They'll just call a waste company and have picked up within an hour. That or have them repackaged and sent out...

    1. Re:Wonderful by myLobster · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the least AOL could do is publish their software on CD-RWs.

      --

      Ceci n'est pas une .sig
    2. Re:Wonderful by Johnso · · Score: 1
      Everyone jokes about repackaging the discs but there's almost no way they'd do this. It would probably cost thousands more than just producing a million fresh ones.

      I'm sure the production line for producing these is very efficient. Having to manually repackage them (or at worst, manually feed them into a repacking line) would be a waste of organizational time and man hourse. And they'd be getting a second-hand product.

      It's a funny thought (it would probably piss the two guys from California off) but there's almost no way.

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    3. Re:Wonderful by ReverendRyan · · Score: 1

      No, CD-RWs are cheap now... We need DVD+RWs... Those are damn expensive. Or prehaps they would let us choose :)

    4. Re:Wonderful by EvanED · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to mention, if you read the article, they scratch all the CDs so they can't be sent out.

    5. Re:Wonderful by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I think the least AOL could do is publish their software on CD-RWs.

      Ahh, remember the days of floppy disk magazine coverdisks? They always came in handy when you were running low on media...

      Same for musical cassette promos.

  8. But... by dalassa · · Score: 2

    Where will I get all my shiny coasters from now?

    --
    Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.
    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. Just download the latest version of Easy CD Creator and you'll have coasters coming out your ears :)

  9. How about just sending them back? by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Drop off a million discs in a truckload, and they'll just have someone on the maintenance staff cart them off. End of problem. But if you just mail each disc *back* to AOL, then they'll have to continually weed out all of the discs they get, possibly for years.

    1. Re:How about just sending them back? by yycs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any by doing this, you help keep down the cost of future postage as you just gave the US Post Office $370,000.

    2. Re:How about just sending them back? by akb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In general this is a good strategy for dealing with junk mail. Individual returns usually get you taken off the mailing list. It costs the post office more to send it back, if a large enough percentage of junk mail gets returned they'll raise the bulk rate for the junkers. And dealing with the returned mail costs the junkers as well. Just throwing junk out keeps their costs down.

    3. Re:How about just sending them back? by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

      I agree, I think that simply sending the discs back in the mail is a superior strategy. To this day, my father still sends all the junk mail he receives back to the sender in their own postage-paid envelopes. It might not reduce the volume of junk mail, but at least you can snicker as you stick it to them!

    4. Re:How about just sending them back? by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

      Yeah? Well, my father stuffs all the junkmail for a week into one or two business-reply-mail envelopes, and sends those back.

      Well, he used to. Now that we've moved, (actually creating an address in the process), we don't get much junk mail.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    5. Re:How about just sending them back? by alcohollins · · Score: 5, Informative

      Drop off a million discs in a truckload, and they'll just have someone on the maintenance staff cart them off. End of problem. But if you just mail each disc *back* to AOL, then they'll have to continually weed out all of the discs they get, possibly for years.

      Read their FAQ. Here's why:

      4. Why don't we just send our CDs right back to AOL ourselves?

      Quite frankly, AOL is unlikely to change their behavior without a large public demonstration of dissatisfaction. Getting some of their junk mail back each day will have little if any effect. However, receiving several truckloads of their CDs, all at once in broad daylight, with the media in full attendance, will have a larger impact. Note that AOL sends this stuff out as bulk mail - there's no return postage paid, so writing "Return To Sender" and throwing it back in the mail just makes more work for the Post Office (they have to pick them up and sort them out, then toss 'em in the garbage. AOL will not see that CD or pay any additional postage).

    6. Re:How about just sending them back? by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've been doing this for awhile myself. Every time I get some sort of junk mail, I rip it up and put it in the pre-paid return envelope. It may not do much, but its still a few cents more in costs for these companies. Now if I could just get enough people to follow suit...
      Unfortunatly, it seems to be too much of a hassle for most people. Come on, people, its a minute or two of your life, and if there are enough of us doing it, it might actually make a dent.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    7. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Better yet, mail them 10,000,000 high quality glossy photos of the goatse.cx guy. Disguise the letters as techsupport questions, or thank you notes (i.e. "How do I scan this photo here")

      The turnover rates for whoever checks the mail will skyrocket.

    8. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      writing "Return To Sender" and throwing it back in the mail just makes more work for the Post Office

      and we know how, er, touchy those post office employees can get. Best to just toss it and back slowly away.

    9. Re:How about just sending them back? by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Watch out one fine soul in Long Island was recently arrested for inciting panick for sending a brown envelope with newspaper ad clippings for the long island power authority along with his bill. Some idi^h^h^h person in their mail room thought it was an anthrax attack because he put lipa sucks on the outside. He was actually arrested and now has to pay a lawyer to defend himself. Not only that but when he went in to pick up his court summons they threw him in jail overnight on a 23 year old walking a dog without a leash violation!!!!! For more info see this article.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      3rd class mail doesn't get returned.

    11. Re:How about just sending them back? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      This is nothing. I get pieces of scrap wood or metal and fill the envelopes with those. I assume these postage-paid envelopes are charged based on weight, so the heavier you can make them, the better.

    12. Re:How about just sending them back? by 95_gst_al · · Score: 1

      i agree. send it back to them. i mean a million disk will be hard as hell to move off a truck before the cops show up, or security deals with them. it would take a few 18 wheelers to do this. they might be small, but when you put a few thousand in a box they get heavy real quick. yet, pack a million disk in a truck. more power to them. they are going to be unloading disks for a quiet a while!

      --
      When all else fails, piss on it. At least you will feel better in some kind of way.
    13. Re:How about just sending them back? by jez9999 · · Score: 0

      This point about sending the stuff back was addresses above. Apparently you CAN'T send them back (for free) - they will just be thrown away, costing AOL nothing, so sending back will do nothing. Wasted time.

    14. Re:How about just sending them back? by Shagg · · Score: 2

      This is nothing. I get pieces of scrap wood or metal and fill the envelopes with those. I assume these postage-paid envelopes are charged based on weight, so the heavier you can make them, the better.

      Tie the envelope to a brick. Yes, the USPS will actually deliver that and charge for it.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    15. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know those payment drop boxes at Time Warner cable offices? Drop your CD's in there!

    16. Re:How about just sending them back? by doobie · · Score: 3, Funny

      I do this all the time. I give them a note to please recycle it due to the fact my apartment complex does not have a recycling system. I used to fill the envelope with cheese that is just starting to mold, but due to Sept. 11th I decided to stop. In a few years I'll start doing that again. Chase Bank was the worst. They sent me a new thing every week for like a year. I even started putting rocks in it to increase the weight (and hopefully the cost to them). I was thinking glueing the envelope to a brick, but never tried it.

    17. Re:How about just sending them back? by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing with all of those annoying magazine inserts, I just send them back unfilled. I wonder if that'll be their next campaign.

    18. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and imagine the look on the guy's face when you go to get them mass-produced (unless you have the time and patience to print 10,000,000 copies yourself)....

    19. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, attach a brick to the sase.....

      IIRC the company has to pay the entire postage, regardless of the item.

    20. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Absolutely nothing prevents the future increase of postage, certainly not anything involving them getting extra income.

    21. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, those Chase Bank guys are gnarly. I get atleast one letter a week! Good idea, think i'll try it :)

    22. Re:How about just sending them back? by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      I actually put some sort of scrap metal in the envelope (from contrsuction sites). MUCH heavier and costlier to the junk mail senders.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    23. Re:How about just sending them back? by mlong · · Score: 2
      i agree. send it back to them. i mean a million disk will be hard as hell to move off a truck before the cops show up

      That's what a drunk truck is for. Maybe 10 seconds and you're done, and lots of CD's on the front door step. I of course do not advocate such things, merely stating how someone could do it :)

      --
      //m
    24. Re:How about just sending them back? by mlong · · Score: 2
      That's what a drunk truck is for. Maybe 10 seconds and you're done, and lots of CD's on the front door step. I of course do not advocate such things, merely stating how someone could do it :)

      Oh actually a dump truck would be better....

      --
      //m
    25. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've also been mad enough to attach the return envelope to a brick or fill it with as many rocks as possible. Hoping, that just maybe, they have to pay a bundle more in postage when it gets back to the sender.

      Don't know how much good it's done, but occasionally makes me feel good.

    26. Re:How about just sending them back? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "It may not do much, but its still a few cents more in costs for these companies."

      The funny thing is that business reply mail costs them more money than you putting a stamp on it. Basic BRM costs a grand total of $0.97 per envelope. It can get down to $0.348, but only after they barcode their own envelopes and shell out about $7800 a year.

    27. Re:How about just sending them back? by $lacker · · Score: 1

      Pfft You can do better than that
      Tape the pre-paid envelope to a brick and put it in the mailbox

      --


      This post is brought to you by the letters T and A, and the number 69
    28. Re:How about just sending them back? by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      "But if you just mail each disc *back* to AOL, then they'll have to continually weed out all of the discs they get, possibly for years." I've known the post office to be slow but not THAT slow.

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    29. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The funny thing is that business reply mail costs them more money than you putting a stamp on it

      Well, of course it does... if I put the stamp on it, it costs the company NOTHING !!!

    30. Re:How about just sending them back? by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1

      Tie the envelope to a brick. Yes, the USPS will actually deliver that and charge for it.

      According to This (pdf) the USPS just trashes them:

      When heavy items such as bricks, 2 x 4s, etc., are found in the mails with a BRM card or envelope
      pasted, stapled, or taped on them as an address label, the pieces should be treated as are other
      nonmailable items found loose in the mails. If the sender cannot be identified, the matter should be
      disposed of as waste. If the misused BRM card or envelope is affixed as an address label to a
      sealed parcel or container, the piece should be treated as dead mail. Please note that these
      procedures should be followed when a BRM card or a BRM envelope is attached to such heavy
      items. It is obvious in such cases that the piece is being used in a manner other than that intended
      by the distributor.


      It's probably more effective to be more subtle and send back the original shredded material as other posters have suggested.
    31. Re:How about just sending them back? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I was thinking glueing the envelope to a brick, but never tried it.

      I'm looking forward to doing that soon, thanks for the idea! :-)

    32. Re:How about just sending them back? by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 2

      I do this too, and usually I include some little Church of the SubGenius ads as well.

      --Rev. Tetsujin,
      First Mechanized Church of the Iron Yeti

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
    33. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell would you do that? Time Warner Cable is so distantly related to AOL that you would only be annoying people who already hate AOL.

    34. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Friday. I think you were just jumping the gun on the weekend when you will probably be drunk. Hopefully you will stay away from the truck though.

    35. Re:How about just sending them back? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2

      If your brick weighs more than one pound (grep for "Drop Off"), then you'll have to take it to the post office, thanks to Ted Kaczynski.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    36. Re:How about just sending them back? by operagost · · Score: 1

      And I thought you meant a drunk should be driving the truck. I had hilarious imaginings of some slob staggering out of the cab and puking on the security officer's shoes.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    37. Re:How about just sending them back? by gauche · · Score: 1
      Now if I could just get enough people to follow suit... Unfortunatly, it seems to be too much of a hassle for most people. Come on, people, its a minute or two of your life, and if there are enough of us doing it, it might actually make a dent.


      Um... There are starving people in much of the world. There are people who have never seen clean water. There are people who are dying of treatable diseases.


      I dislike junk mail just as much as the next person, and the environmental impact of things like mass-mailed CDs or four-color glossy adverts is ridiculous, but if you're trying to start a grassroots movement to make a dent in something, you could at least make it in the name of something other than convenience.


      There are greater evils than junk mail.

    38. Re:How about just sending them back? by akb · · Score: 2

      Not all junk mail is third class. Plus, even if the post office throws it away they still have to deal with it. If enough people make them deal with it they'll pass that on to the junkers.

    39. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes they deal with it by hiring more people to deal with it. Where do you think they get the money to do that?

    40. Re:How about just sending them back? by mlong · · Score: 2
      And I thought you meant a drunk should be driving the truck. I had hilarious imaginings of some slob staggering out of the cab and puking on the security officer's shoes.

      No I would never advocate drunk driving, especially with such a dangerous cargo. Those free hours add up you know.

      --
      //m
    41. Re:How about just sending them back? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I thought he meant getting a truckload of drunks to chuck the disks onto Steve Cases' lawn. Not that I would advocate such a thing of course. ;)

    42. Re:How about just sending them back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to point out that you didn't read the entire post, he goes on to say that BRM (Business Reply Mail- already paid by the business) costs more than a straight 1st class letter; about .$60 more.

      Please read an entire post before spouting off next time, please.

  10. I miss the floppies by Ainu · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least the floppies you could use them for something else.. how about a law that says that they can not use cd-r, only allow them to use cd-rw? Free cd-rw for us all!

    1. Re:I miss the floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my current Linux Boot floppy is a former AOL disk

    2. Re:I miss the floppies by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      They do (or did) come in those big plastic DVD cases - which are still 2 bucks apiece last time I saw empty ones on the shelves.

      I liberated the cases from everyone I knew to stick used (and homeless) ps2/xbox/gamecube games in.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:I miss the floppies by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      You could always hang the cds from the rear view mirror of your hotrod Hyundai Elantra. They're oh so stylish.

    4. Re:I miss the floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey that would match the coffe can muffler i use perfectly!

      does aol make yellow stickers too?

    5. Re:I miss the floppies by mechugena · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I still remember when Prodigy was giving out floppies. I created a macro that ran repeatedly overnight. My college mailroom must've hated constant deliveries of THOUSANDS of disks each week. But, it was a good money-making deal...peel the labels, format, sell to poor college students!

    6. Re:I miss the floppies by freeweed · · Score: 2

      I use the ones I get from AOL to store SegaCD games in. Seems fitting, somehow...

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  11. Here's some links by qurob · · Score: 5, Informative


    Various links for Slashdotites pleasure

    Haikus

    No More AOL CD's.com

    Fun things to do with AOL CD's

    1. Re:Here's some links by MatejC · · Score: 1

      Stamp art projects are the best way to recycle those AO-hell cd's. I am happy that they are sent to me. I even pick up extras at Sam's Club.

      Check out some cd art here:
      http://www.rubberstampsclub.com/tips/cd-pin s.html

      Cheers!

  12. 1 billion hours free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1 million disks * 1000 hours each = 1 billion hours free.

    Thats about 10 minutes for everybody on earth.

    1. Re:1 billion hours free. by docbrown42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      1 million disks * 1000 hours each = 1 billion hours free.

      Thats about 10 minutes for everybody on earth.


      It should be just enough time to close all the pop-up ads.

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
    2. Re:1 billion hours free. by VikingBerserker · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about spatial volume?

      Let's see, 1 million discs at 4 3/4" diameter, 1/16" thick... that's about 204 cubic feet of discs, assuming they're packed tightly.

      That's like filling a dump truck to about two feet thick, by my reckoning.

      I think AOL's getting off easy. I'd say we should try returning 1 BILLION discs. Then it would be harder for them to ignore.

    3. Re:1 billion hours free. by SB5 · · Score: 1
      1 million disks * 1000 hours each = 1 billion hours free.

      Thats about 10 minutes for everybody on earth.

      Obviously we are not talking about anything sexual related otherwise people would be interested and AOL's Ass would be very sore.
      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    4. Re:1 billion hours free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, according to your math there are only
      100 million humans on the planet earth...

      I think you need to check some of the latest cenus figures...

    5. Re:1 billion hours free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, according to your math there are only
      100 million humans on the planet earth...


      No, according to your math everyone would recieve 10 hours.

      According to his math there are 6 billion people in the world.

    6. Re:1 billion hours free. by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      Um.. you need to check YOUR math. 10 minutes, not 10 hours.

      10 minutes = 1/6 hour.

      1/6 hour / person * 6 billion people = 1 billion hours

    7. Re:1 billion hours free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 million disks * 1000 hours each = 1 billion hours free.
      = 1,000,000,000 hours

      Current population estimated as 6,250,605,490

      Time/person = 1,000,000,000 hours/6,250,605,490 people
      = 0.159984500958 hours/person
      = 9.59907005748 minutes/person

    8. Re:1 billion hours free. by Dannon · · Score: 2

      I can't get my mind off of the old analogy of a van full of data tapes travelling cross-country.

      Anyone care to do the math to figure out the bandwidth of one million (or billion) AOL disks travelling at highway speeds?

      --
      Good judgment comes from experience.
      Experience comes from bad judgment.
    9. Re:1 billion hours free. by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I can't get my mind off of the old analogy of a van full of data tapes travelling cross-country.

      Anyone care to do the math to figure out the bandwidth of one million (or billion) AOL disks travelling at highway speeds?

      Probably fairly low, given that the contents of all the CDs are identical (or nearly so). OTOH, it would be highly redundant storage...RAID would have nothing on it. :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    10. Re:1 billion hours free. by somethingwicked · · Score: 2
      (Finger to corner of mouth)

      "We'll hold them for ransom of ONE BILLION HOURS!!!"

      Looks around at unimpressed faces of his group.

      After all, One Billion AOL Hours are far less valuable than One Millions Dollars

      --

      ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    11. Re:1 billion hours free. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      1 million disks * 1000 hours each = 1 billion hours free.

      Well, the discs don't actually represent free hours. Anyone (with a checking account or credit card) can get the free hours with or without the disc.

      Also you figure if 1% forget to unsubscribe, that's $200,000 for AOL.

    12. Re:1 billion hours free. by Terralthra · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, such a calculation is difficult to make without making some assumptions, but here's a try....let's see here.

      They intend to bring 1,000,000 (1x10^6) AOL CDs from El Cerrito, CA, to AOL Corporate HQ in Dulles, Virginia. While the exact location in either city can not be determined, we'll do our best with just the cities. There are 2 El Cerritos in CA, one in Contra Costa County, one in Riverside County. We'll use the one in Contra Costa, just for fun.

      That's a distance of 2790.02 miles. Now, each AOL CD has a maximum data capacity of approximately 650 MB. Even if the CD is not "full", the whole CD is still being transferred and thus the whole data capacity counts.

      So, 650 MB X 1x10^6 = 6.5x10^8 MB. Let's do this in the standard kilobits/sec that most ISPs measure their bandwidth in, so 6.5x10^8 x 1024 to get KB, then x 8 to get Kb. 5.3248 x 10^12 Kb are being transferred.

      Now, I live in Northern California, where freeway speeds usually run about 85 mph, but for the sake of national averages, let's say they make an average of 65 mph. 65 mph over their 2790.02 mile trip is 42.92 hours.

      Dividing the total Kb by the hours, we get 1.2406 x 10^11 (rounded) Kb/hr. Divided by 60 minutes per hour, that's 2.0677 x 10^9 Kb/minute, once more for the seconds/minute, and we get 3.4462 x 10^7 Kb/sec.

      That's approximately 23,000 times as fast as my 1.5/384 DSL connection.


      --
      -Terralthra...
    13. Re:1 billion hours free. by operagost · · Score: 1

      But the latency sucks ass.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    14. Re:1 billion hours free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good work, Dannon. The more stupid and pointless the math problem, the quicker some dork is to impress us with his solution.

    15. Re:1 billion hours free. by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Contra Costa County is Correct !

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    16. Re:1 billion hours free. by trmj · · Score: 1

      But only for the first month.

      --
      Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    17. Re:1 billion hours free. by cappadocius · · Score: 1

      AOL and fast data rates? It'll be a first.

      --

      omnia tua castra sunt nobis

  13. Yeah, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're just bitter because AOL doesn't mail out CDRWs.

  14. and just like all junk mail by kraada · · Score: 1

    AOL will look at their "mail" and hit the "delete" key. Wouldn't you if someone sent you mail of 1 million scratched and useless cds?

  15. Or better yet: "Copy protect" it by indiigo · · Score: 2

    Take a thick black marker, and all along the edges, the inside, and the back of the disk, cover the disk in ink. This will uphold your right to "stay legal" and never copy a copyrighted work. The unexpected and delightful side effect is you cannot use the disk ever again, eiher.

    --
    fslg503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-86 8650 3-985-fdsg8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-9
  16. who/where by kguilber · · Score: 1

    So where do we find an address to send CDs? Nowhere do I see the website listed.

    1. Re:who/where by Rastor · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that seems to be par for slashdot these days.

      Google holds the answer, however:

      nomoreaolcds.com

    2. Re:who/where by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      It's in large, bold printon the main page of the website(http://www.nomoreaolcds.com/)

      No More AOL CDs!
      1601 Navellier St.
      El Cerrito CA, 94530
      U.S.A.

      -Slashdot Junky

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    3. Re:who/where by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Funny
      It's in large, bold printon the main page of the website(http://www.nomoreaolcds.com/) No More AOL CDs! 1601 Navellier St. El Cerrito CA, 94530 U.S.A.

      Irony or Insanity: a guy who's sick of getting AOL CDs says, "send me a million of them!"

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    4. Re:who/where by FuddChuckles · · Score: 1

      Anyone else think its funny that CNN, the child company of AOL/Time Warner, did not put the nomoreaolcds.com url in the story?

      -FC

    5. Re:who/where by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Irony or insane! I'd say both if that is his personal address, because he'll still get CDs long after he has moved onto some other cause. He should have acquired a PO box or mailbox at something like Mailboxes, Etc, so that it could be returned.

      Regardless, I admire his intention, his intent to make a point. Sure, AOL will dismiss it and have the 1,000,000 hauled off in a blink of an eye. It's the principal of the matter! What ever happen to principals!

      Later,
      -Slashdot Junky

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    6. Re:who/where by dsl · · Score: 0

      What happened to the principals? They're down at the high school, where they've always been.

      I'm not so much a spelling nazi; it's just the principle of the thing.

      --
      I refuse, on principle, to have a .sig.
  17. Slogan for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've got too much time on your hands: you are posting on Slashdot, after all.

    Same applies to me...

  18. No good to use hours by Kphrak · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know if this is still true (the last time I used AOL was about '94), but once you started using the free hours, AOL needed a credit card number. Just in case you, uh, go over the limit. What they didn't tell you is that if you did go over the limit, you wouldn't be notified; they just quietly started billing you. Then it was the devil's own work to try and get them to stop, and especially to get your CC out of their database.

    If this is all still the case, using your "free" hours is shooting yourself in the foot.

    --

    There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
    1. Re:No good to use hours by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      Sign up for a new CC and ask for a $100 or $500 limit. Go out and buy something, leaving yourself $1 on the card, and use it online ;-)

      The interest payments are worth the insurance :-)

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    2. Re:No good to use hours by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

      Keep in mind that as soon as AOL charges the CC, your credit rating takes a hit.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    3. Re:No good to use hours by mjgamble · · Score: 2, Informative

      American Express and Citibank both have a virtual account feature. You get a new temporary CC#. You can set the credit limit and duration (at least at Citibank you can). It is a very nice feature when buying from shady places. I think we can classify the AOL 1000 hour account as shady, don't you?

    4. Re:No good to use hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh.. You have to use the free hours in the first month.. The second month, it starts to cost regular AOL fees.

      Oh, and they dont want the CC _after_ youve used the hours, you have to give it to them FIRST.

      Oh, and some of their CD's now say 'NEW! No credit card required' - this is nothing new - if you dont have a CC you have to give them a check account # so they can take the money directly from you..

      AOL has long required either a CC, or your checking acct # for direct withdrawal, and they still do.

      Now what would be funny, would be to open a checking account with a few bucks, open an AOL account, then go and close the checking account the next day.. Then use the AOL account until it died. Of course, they'd probably send you to collections and report you to the credit agencies - which is their secondary reason for demanding one of those two payment methods up front - they can use them to track you down..

    5. Re:No good to use hours by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      Not if you mention to the CC company that they're not authorized to bill you. I've done that to some nice companies (like Bell and Columbia House) and both quit billing me right away; seems the CC companies get pretty pissed off about these things, and actually have clout with even large corp's.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    6. Re:No good to use hours by Myco · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you continue to use the credit card with a company after listing that company as unauthorized to bill the card, I'm pretty sure that qualifies as fraud.

    7. Re:No good to use hours by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

      From what I understand, you no longer need a credit card to start your trial. At least I remember hearing that on one of their insipid commercials.

    8. Re:No good to use hours by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      What they didn't tell you is that if you did go over the limit, you wouldn't be notified; they just quietly started billing you.

      They don't do this any more. In fact, last time I signed up I used way over the limit (by accident) and they didn't even notice.

    9. Re:No good to use hours by Algan · · Score: 1

      No good, most CC issuers will be happy to accept the transaction just to charge you over the limit fees.

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    10. Re:No good to use hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the fact that *they* might keep trying to bill to it doesn't mean that *you're* still using it.

    11. Re:No good to use hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "last time I signed up I used way over the limit (by accident)"

      The 'last time' you signed up? So you're a spammer, then? That would explain the 'accidental' use of more than 1000 hours of free trial.

    12. Re:No good to use hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about sign up for a credit card, use it to sign up to aol with, then cancel the card. Oops, the card is no longer valid... damn :(

      Or just use an existing card, and then call up your cc company and have them change your number and issue you a new card.

      -- gid0ze

    13. Re:No good to use hours by Myco · · Score: 2

      Unless they're billing you for charges you didn't accrue, I'd say you're still using it. It's deceptive.

  19. RETURN TO SENDER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the UK you can forward or return to sender for free (AFAIK - please correct me if I'm wrong) simply by writing the correct address on the letter and posting again, stating "forward to:" or "return to sender".
    Send em back to AOL!

    1. Re:RETURN TO SENDER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True in the US for "First Class" postage. But I'd be willing to bet the CDs are a "bulk" class.

  20. Strangely, some collect AOL discs like comic books by loggia · · Score: 4, Informative

    On the flip side, there are some strange people who collect the various thousands of different AOL discs, like people collect baseball cards or comic books.

    http://www.kcstar.com/item/pages/local.pat,local /3 accd753.723,.html

  21. hey i like those CDs... by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 2, Informative

    especially the ones that come with DVD cases or the CD cases.
    helps me store my burned VCDs, downloaded from Kazaa.

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    1. Re:hey i like those CDs... by CptNoSkill · · Score: 1

      Yea, remove the aol cover, and print out a new one for, say the new Red Hat 8.0. I downloaded it, and make a custom case using the junk^H^H^H 'promotional mail' AOL sends me..

  22. Here is the link to these guy's site by Drestin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why don't articles actually post the URL to the site?!

    http://www.nomoreaolcds.com/

    1. Re:Here is the link to these guy's site by floydigus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or put the url in an anchor () tag?

      --

      All things in moderation; including moderation

    2. Re:Here is the link to these guy's site by BornInASmallTown · · Score: 1
      Why don't commenters actually make the URL a link?

      http://www.nomoreaolcds.com/

    3. Re:Here is the link to these guy's site by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      Actually, the article does post a link to the site. Look at the link in the "Related" box on the CNN article's page.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    4. Re:Here is the link to these guy's site by echucker · · Score: 2

      Why don't articles actually post the URL to the site?!

      Perhaps because AOL is CNN's parent company, and they don't want to deal with the hassle? If you were the webmaster of PayPal, would you link to paypalsucks.com?

      Putting it in the sidebar as another poster mentioned is sufficient.

    5. Re:Here is the link to these guy's site by cetan · · Score: 1

      I would, but only if I was quitting or trying to get fired :)

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
  23. Ah yes. by Ted_Green · · Score: 1

    A plot for power.

    In America, first you get the CDs, then you get the power, then you get the women. ...or was that sugar?

  24. Postage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'll volunteer my companies Pitney Bowes postage meter if those guys want to mail them all back.

  25. The Address by FreshMeat-BWG · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mail all your unwanted AOL CDs to: No More AOL CDs! 1601 Navellier St. El Cerrito CA, 94530 U.S.A.

  26. It's a great effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just write on unopened package "Refused Return to Sender." Costs AOL 83 cents for everyone that comes back! Add it to the 22 cents it cost them to bulk mail it.

    They'll learn.

    1. Re:It's a great effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post office will not accept "Refused Return to Sender" bulk mail. They will tell you to throw it away if you do not want it. Try it sometime, if it works it is because you happen to have a nice postman who is simply going to throw it away for you. They will not return it to AOL.

  27. hit counter on their site by miltimj · · Score: 1, Funny

    On their website, they have a (worthless) hit counter..

    From the Perl FAQ:
    I still don't get locking. I just want to increment the number in the file. How can I do this?
    Didn't anyone ever tell you web-page hit counters were useless? They don't count number of hits, they're a waste of time, and they serve only to stroke the writer's vanity. It's better to pick a random number; they're more realistic.

    --
    "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
    1. Re:hit counter on their site by Tall_Rob · · Score: 1

      Why do you say they're useless? Not meaning to troll or flamebait; I'm genuinely curious. Don't they count page loads accurately? Thanks.

    2. Re:hit counter on their site by miltimj · · Score: 1

      Since I've already been slammed for being OT (though I meant to be a cross between insightful and funny, since their site is based on numbers anyway), I'll spare any explanation.

      Instead, I'll direct you to this rant/explanation.

      Basically, I can hit refresh all day and it records every one of those "hits"..

      --
      "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
    3. Re:hit counter on their site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not if it uses cookies...tool! Then you would just be wasting your time.

    4. Re:hit counter on their site by miltimj · · Score: 1

      Not if I turn cookies off..

      Then they'd be wasting their time trying to make me waste my time.. (and still racking up hits on their pathetic counter..)

      --
      "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
  28. This would have been a better story if... by earthloop · · Score: 1

    ...we didn't know about it until after the event. Now AOL are just going to watch out for these guys. Bit of a catch 22 though, how would they get 1M CDs without going public?

    1. Re:This would have been a better story if... by BeeShoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're going public? In this market? That's crazy!
      Anybody know what their ticker symbol is going to be? ;-)

  29. Actual Web Site by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2
    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  30. Wouldn't this actually help AOL... by Principito · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... by cutting down their costs of making the disks?

    --
    "Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle." -- Plato (427?-347? BC)
  31. last time I did AOL by bigpat · · Score: 2

    "seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours. A million people do *that* and I bet they'd stop filling our mailboxes with the landfill of tomorrow"

    Last time I used there free hours I spent 45 minutes on hold trying to cancel the service. And then they called me early on a Saturday Morning a week later asking if I missed AOL and wanted to come back.

    My advice, just use the damn disks turned upside down as shiny coasters and ignore AOL, it will eventually go away.

  32. Re:Strangely, some collect AOL discs like comic bo by Cousin+Dupree · · Score: 1

    I don't care much for the discs, but I do like those Altoid-style tins they come in lately. Keep 'em coming!

  33. US Postal Service by bstadil · · Score: 2
    Go to the local post office where they have a display of AOL disks and grab a few.

    It really bothers me that a quasi government institution advertise for AOL.

    It even looks like they are "approved" by USPS, as the boxes are sitting next to posters mentioning ability to check deliviry via Internet.

    That being said the box you get from AOL once a month or so is very sturdy and excellent to mail home made CD's to friends and family. Send the CD's back to AOL but keep the box. ;-)

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  34. I just use them as a free source of CD cases by starseeker · · Score: 3

    Or DVD on the better ones. My physics professor got a bunch of these for some reason, so I just scrape off or cover the annoying stickers and have a high quality cd case. I really think they must be getting the cases from the same place as the DVD people. They're even better than music cd style jewel cases since they don't crack as easily, and they're a heck of a lot better than those thin ones.

    If they really want to make a splash, why not collect the cases, devise some easy and cheap way to get the stickers off, and resell them by the crate? Making a profit off of junk mail - now THAT would be a story :-)

    --
    "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
    1. Re:I just use them as a free source of CD cases by foolish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, that's what they ARE trying to do! They are constantly in the search for re-use of the packaging, when it something other than shrinkwrap.

      The trouble with the DVD style cases is that the stickers can be hard to uniformly strip off, making it hard to convince people to take them/reuse them.

      IIRC, they've talked with movie rental places, used DVD/CD stores, and schools about giving them the cases, since they're just interested in the CDs themselves...

      All in all very pleasant fellows, looking for a creative way to apply the clue stick to a corporation that does'nt seem to get that sending multiple CDs to someone week after week is unlikely to make them sign up multiple times.

  35. What a thoughtless waste... by stienman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, they are asking 1 million people to spend upwards of 40 cents each to send a useless CD to them, then they are going to spend how much to deliver the truckload to AOL?

    Think about it, that's at least $400,000 dollars down the drain! Why not ask people to contribute $0.40 towards infrastructure costs in their area for public 802.11b hotspots. Tell them to mark any and all AOL mail "RETURN TO SENDER" and AOL will bear even greater costs, at no cost to the consumer.

    Egad, people, use your brains.

    Besides, AOL is going down the toilet anyway. Their shiny discs aren't going to be very useful to them after a few years as dialup dwindles, especially since broadband doesn't net them nearly as much profit as dialup once did. They're going to change their business model significantly over the next few years - it'll be interesting.

    But seriously, put your effort into providing free net access for everyone.

    -Adam

    1. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by ColdCuts · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Tell them to mark any and all AOL mail "RETURN TO SENDER" and AOL will bear even greater costs, at no cost to the consumer"

      Bulk mail is not returned to sender. You are simply creating more work for the postal workers.

    2. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by adamjone · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tell them to mark any and all AOL mail "RETURN TO SENDER" and AOL will bear even greater costs, at no cost to the consumer.

      Actually, that won't work. The CD's are shipped 4th class mail. If you mark it return to sender, the post office will return it to the earth. They even mention it in the FAQ

    3. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by c1pher · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tell them to mark any and all AOL mail "RETURN TO SENDER" and AOL will bear even greater costs, at no cost to the consumer."

      because unless return postage is garanteed by AOL for those mailings (which i don't believe is the case), the post office will just toss them in the trash.

      --
      The Adult Happy Meal - "I'm lovin' it!"
    4. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by f97tosc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not ask people to contribute $0.40 towards infrastructure costs in their area for public 802.11b hotspots.

      This sort of posts comes up pretty much every time somebody does something creative, funny and totally useless.

      It is entertainment. People like to spend some of their money on having fun, and this is such an example. Yes, it would be great if people stopped spending any money on pleasures and put it all into charities and infrastructure improvements ... or would it?

      I like the 'return to sender' idea, though. It is easier and quicker to do than finding a stamp and the address of these jokers.

      Tor

    5. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Think about it, that's at least $400,000 dollars down the drain!

      Absolutely! It's better we just spend some time talking about it on /.

      BTW, this guy got tired of getting AOL CDs in the mail. What will getting a million of them do to him?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    6. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by stienman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I realize that. However, if one million people did this the USPS would be none too pleased, and may require AOL to either pay for the additional trash, or use a different rate. It will cost the post office time, money, and space, and they will pass that back to AOL.

      Either way, it would be more trouble and more costly to AOL than delivering a million CDs on convenient string spindles to their doorstep. Chances are they'd mount them somewhere as a tribute to their fans who'd go to so much trouble.

      Now, if they were going to make art out of this then I'd understand, but I still think the same objectives could be accomplished more efficiently and more pointedly through other means.

      -Adam

    7. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by stienman · · Score: 2

      This sort of posts comes up pretty much every time somebody does something creative, funny and totally useless.

      I'm glad that you can classify my post - it must give you a warm fuzzy feeling knowing exactly where my opinions can go. :-)

      However, they are trying to make a point to AOL, and I was simply demonstrating that the point they are trying to make can be made more cheaply and expressively through other means. Furthermore, they can deal a real blow to AOL if they support public internet access.

      It does meet all the criteria as an 'artsy' concept, though. It's expensive, it's 'loud', and it will make very little real difference in the long run.

      -Adam

    8. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, how about getting MSN or Earthlink to donate postage-paid mailers for the things. $400k is a small price to pay for some negative publicity for one of their arch-rival. Hell, you can hardly even hire a PR firm employee to lie about switching to XP fo that kind of money!

    9. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by rhfrommn · · Score: 1

      Ummm, you realize in your sig if the price to performance ratio gives a divide by zero error, you are saying the PERFORMANCE is zero, not the price, right?

      --
      My motto is: Never give up - unless it's harder than you want it to be.
    10. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      The CD's are shipped 4th class mail.

      That may hold for the USA, but (despite their name), AOL is global. I'm sure there's a few countries where they have to pay for it...

    11. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 1

      You are. You are a poindexter who probably does not have the first clue about providing any sort of wireless network to anybody. So shut up and stop being a dork.

      Your wife and yourself are ugly and on the heavy side. Perhaps, you guys could get in to shape by learning how to dance and socialize with non poindexters.

      Thanks.
      DJ Firbee

      Have some balls and mod this up.

    12. Re:What a thoughtless waste... by revery · · Score: 1

      I realize that. However, if one million people did this the USPS would be none too pleased, and may require AOL to either pay for the additional trash, or use a different rate. It will cost the post office time, money, and space, and they will pass that back to AOL.

      No, they won't pass it back to AOL. AOL has already paid them for delivery and disposal, they can't recharge them, but they may raise their prices for everyone. The government doesn't stick it to a single vendor because of an increase in disposal costs, they factor that into their budget and they raise their prices to match. Do you really want 40 cent stamps?

  36. Its ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN is an AOL time warner company

  37. I wish... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    I wish someone would make a car that runs on these.

    I'm not about to add insult to my already injury by forking over postage to send this crap to these guys, even if that helped out the USPS (which it may actually not, depending how they manage to get into debt.)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:I wish... by frozenray · · Score: 1

      >I wish someone would make a car that runs on these.

      Well, there's this. The next step would be to make it run on AOL CDs.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  38. AOL Construction Kit by shoemakc · · Score: 4, Funny


    Turn those disks into something useful; Purchase the AOL Construction Kit?

    -Chris

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  39. Get on the ball Australia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You crazy Aussies have only sent in 37 CD's!

  40. They arent CDR's anyway by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Ive not seen a CDR from AOL yet.. never will since its cheaper to have them pressed..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:They arent CDR's anyway by caseyc · · Score: 1

      But, hey...even if they were "only" CDR and not CDRW...still not a total loss. Can't you still record data in another "session" on a CDR? Of course, it's not like that matters. They aren't either one. :(

  41. call up tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  42. oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, they are annoying but they are not as bad a Microsoft. What I would do is plaster the microsoft campus with AOL discs.

  43. As an aol user..... by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I think this is funny. But on the other hand, AOL in itself isn't bad. Yes they do send out too many free AOL CDs, but that is to get more users. As anyone ever looked at one of those CDs closely? It is both Mac and PC compatible. They are doing there best to get new uses.

    On the other hand, I have decided awhile ago to get a new email address because of all the spam that I get. "Unsecured Visa", "Congratulations...", and there are many other subject lines that are inapporaitate. When I check my aol account, its a habit to scan down through the subject lines and then the address of the sender, if I don't reconize the address or the subject is not interesting, it is automatically deleted.

    Pet peeve about the picture, AOL has released 8.0, why are they showing 7.0? AOL 8.0 on cd should be on its way to your house.

    1. Re:As an aol user..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a farkin nard. I hope this was some lame joke that I missed

  44. Return to sender? by alta · · Score: 1

    what about if we just wrote return to sender on each CD we get?

    Hell, I'm going to try that with all my junk mail for now on.

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  45. RTS them by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    So it doesn't cost money, while AOLs bulk rate goes up.

    1. Re:RTS them by RaboKrabekian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      AOl sends their CDs 4th class bulk, meaning that if you try to return to sender the post office just throws them away. AOL won't pay a dime.

      --
      "Moderate drinking can help prevent amputated limbs" -- Abigail Zuger, NYTimes, 12/31/02
    2. Re:RTS them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standard (i.e. bulk commercial) mail
      is not returned to the sender or forwarded, it
      is just 'wasted' by the post office, so your strategy would not work. If anything it's just creating more work for the mail carrier who has to
      deal with it. Certainly aol will not have to pay
      extra postage if you refuse the discs.

    3. Re:RTS them by rustycage · · Score: 1

      I'm confused. On a somewhat related note, my Dad simply writes on the outside of the AOL disk mailer: "REFUSED DELIVERY - PLEASE REMOVE FROM MAILING LIST" AFAIK he has yet to receive another disk from AOL (he was getting several a *month* at one time). He's also dramatically cut down on the number of amount of other junk mail he gets. vs. AOl sends their CDs 4th class bulk, meaning that if you try to return to sender the post office just throws them away. AOL won't pay a dime. Which is true? They can't both be.

      --
      No Sig For You
    4. Re:RTS them by Snover · · Score: 1

      So, then, if this worked, are you saying that it's actually the POST OFFICE that's doing the actual dirty business of maintaining a list of people to send out these discs to?

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
    5. Re:RTS them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that person is probably lying.

  46. Mean Spirited by twitter · · Score: 2
    So what's wrong with mailing software to people at no cost? I know, I know, better records keeping might help them cut down on the redundancy, but the concept is not evil.

    Evil is making an operating system based on planned obsolescence. I've got a whole file cabinet full of useless floppies and CDs that I actually paid for. They all came with stupid restrictive liceneses and died with the OS they were designed for. If it were not for free software, I would have replaced each and every one of those programs multiple times by now. Instead, I have Debian with free mirrors everywhere so CDs are almost useless.

    I encourage AOL to adopt the Debian distribution model for all of their software, but I'm not going to burden their landfill with my CDs. You might go to jail if you tried the same stupid stunt with lead sinkers. AOL's Mozilla project shows that they understand much and keeps them on my good side. No, you two don't get my CDs.

    Asside, is the AOL server package in Debian really all you need to be an AOL ISP?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Mean Spirited by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Evil is making an operating system based on planned obsolescence.

      Planned obsolescence is the American Way. We must keep people buying new things. We must make the "removing the shrink wrap" the peak ecstatic experience for the consumerist masses.

      And notice that when the economy headed south, Bush was urging us to do our patriotic duty by spending.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:Mean Spirited by thepanda · · Score: 1

      The AOL Server is a HTTP server... see www.aolserver.com.

  47. The CDs are NOT SPAM by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 1
    To me they are more like junk mail. They are a legitimate form of advertising and I don't like the attitude the guys have going out of their way to waste AOLs resources.

    I am a freelance web developer for small businesses. I have had several clients promise me significant amounts of work, but when it comes to a first "official" meeting they consistently "need to reschedule" for a variety of reasons. I consider myself reasonably flexible (especially when chasing big clients) but when they do this on a regular basis, it wastes my time that could be much better spent on legitimate clients. Anyway the point of this is that they are just trying to make a buck, so don't go out of your way to stop them for no good reason.

    -----
    click here and keep one of my clients happy

    1. Re:The CDs are NOT SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These guys AREN'T trying to waste AOL's resources. They say themselves that they only want to collect cds that are going to get thrown away otherwise. If the CD is going to be unwasted, they don't want it.

  48. It's a scam! by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    WAKE UP PEOPLE!
    They are going to use those one thousand free hours from 1 million discs to get themselves 1,000,000,000 free hours of AOL!

    Free AOL for them, their kids, grandkids and great-grandkids.

    I'm on to you bastards...



    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:It's a scam! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be more like a family curse... ;-)

    2. Re:It's a scam! by SebNukem · · Score: 1

      If you consider that there's at least one family member using AOL at any given time, they can stay connected for about 1150 centuries Lucky people.
      Exactly, they will run out of free hours in the year of 116157. At that time, they will have to run another story on Slashdot for another batch.

      Seb

    3. Re:It's a scam! by colerit · · Score: 1

      Not if you scratch the cd's yourself before you send them? since that's what they claim they are going to do anyways.

    4. Re:It's a scam! by sukotto · · Score: 1


      Unfortunately, they'll have to use all those hours in the first month.

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
  49. great targets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AOL CD's used to boot good shooting targets. The problem now is that at 25yds, most of the bullet go through the center hole... just kidding - I still blow them apart. Sad.

  50. I can see the end result now... by JooBYE · · Score: 0

    AOL takes the disks with a smile. Slaps a new postmark on it... RECYLED!

    I agree with the ending comment on the story. "seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours. A million people do *that* and I bet they'd stop filling our mailboxes with the landfill of tomorrow."

    Can't see it happening though...

  51. Send it to the executives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about figuring out the addresses of the AOL executives?

    And rather than collecting a million and deliver at once, just produce easily attached labels with those addresses - so that anybody can send them in that way. If you think it is annoying to get one disc a month, I bet they will dislike getting 10-100 per day.

  52. Some people like the discs by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1
    The discs are good for people who can't afford internet access. They just live off a 1000 free hours forever. AOL doesn't actually make money off of these people, but oh well.

    I don't think junk mail is that bad. Telemarketing is bad. Besides aren't the discs the most honest form of advertisement?

    AOL is novices, but that is an important niche that should be filled.

    1. Re:Some people like the discs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The 1000 hour deal only lasts for 45 days. Actually 1000 hours, if used 24 hours a day every day, would run out in under 42 days. Since most people don't tie up their phone line for 24 hours a day, you can bet most people aren't going to approach anywhere *near* 1000 hours before the 45 days is up, and they are quietly billed at the normal rate.

  53. do it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going to send the CD's back, send them back in the mail *postage due*. The post office wins and AOL loses. Everyone's happy.

  54. The spokesman by Fembot · · Score: 1

    "The spokesman did say that customers who aren't happy about getting the CDs can send them back so the company can recycle them." So what about all of us lot who arent customers, but are annoyed??? And what stops them from sending the CD on again instead of recycling it which is inefficiant?

  55. why doesn't AOL use a Linux distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gee - there's a lot of room left on a CD after copying on AOL's stuff...

    why not ask AOL to distribute Linux and OpenOffice and Mozilla on its CD?

    consumers then get free bonus software?

  56. Remember 'bisk poetry'? by piznut · · Score: 1

    waist to mutch
    it suck
    no good
    send to many bisk.
    mey and my friendz dident have stuf too do
    sew wee got a milyun cds and dropd tehm at AOLs boor

  57. I Miss the floppys.. by thumbtack · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least I could get some practical use out of them. A quick reformat and I was set. Ever since they started sending out shiny plastic discs, I have to actually buy a pack of floppys from time to time. (not that use that many). Maybe if they would send the CDs out on CD-RW.........

    1. Re:I Miss the floppys.. by Tar-Palantir · · Score: 1

      I agree! I used to have about 15 floppies of docs. This was, naturally, before CD writers were common. About 12 of those disks were reformatted, relabeled AOL disks. Family members gave me theirs, too, because I needed more disk space. :)

    2. Re:I Miss the floppys.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Floppys may be on the verge of extinction now, but I do wish they'd do those mass mailings using those nice dvd covers at least.

      That way, even though the cd gets junked I do get some use out of their spam :-)

    3. Re:I Miss the floppys.. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Maybe if they would send the CDs out on CD-RW.

      That would make a very good pro-enviornmental law to pass! Any polititions willing to take this up...? ;-)

  58. Bwahahaha! by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    I LOVE it! I hope they film it - I'd love to see their faces!

  59. Wow, the article even sounds like advertising! by ruiner13 · · Score: 1
    AOL is not the only company that sends out the free CDs, which entice customers with offers of over 1,000 hours of free Internet access. The marketing strategy also is used by AT&T, Earthlink and others.

    Doesn't AOL/Time Warner/Everything else own CNN? Did they have to put that blatant plug in?

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  60. A weird use by sawilson · · Score: 2

    I made a huge tracer gun "remember these things?"
    that had a gear that traveled along a rail with
    teeth on it, and had a slick incline based release
    system. It could fire one AOL cd fast enough to
    go through a cardboard box. I got bored with it
    and stopped work before I solved the problems
    with rapid reloading and charging. It was also
    woefully inaccurate much like the original tracer
    gun. The ammo was free though.

  61. But they're distributing mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand that AOL discs are a nuciance, but in reality they're somewhat promoting part of the open source community by using mozilla in their commercial product... in some way that indirectly promotes the practical and profitable uses for open source... a leader for the community... just don't take after their advertising tactics. It's great that the quality of open source products is good for commercial use and now we have the general public using them, how about a campaign that informs them of this?

  62. Stack 1,000,000 AOL CD's by qurob · · Score: 4, Informative


    1,000,000 AOL CD's would be a measely 50,000 feet.

    Just think, if they collected 302,860,800,000 AOL CD's they could stack them and it'd touch the moon!

  63. put it on CD-RWs and win the hearts of millions by mbourgon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...of geeks. I really wish AOL had put these on CD-Rs or CD-RWs... I think that if you make a buttload of them, it's probably doable. If, everytime you got an AOL disk, you knew you could put another 650 meg on it, would you throw it away? (Maybe). But you'd probably keep them around as spares.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    1. Re:put it on CD-RWs and win the hearts of millions by c1pher · · Score: 1

      considering the cost difference of extremely cheap mass produced pressed CD's versus CD-RW, a tight-wad corporation already going down the drain with their dying dial-up service, is hardly likely to do that anytime soon ;-)

      --
      The Adult Happy Meal - "I'm lovin' it!"
    2. Re:put it on CD-RWs and win the hearts of millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Customer:
      Thank you for your interest in AOL and the Time Warner brand. This disc has been shipped to you in a special CD-R format. If you have a cd burner, in addition to 1000 free hours, which you may spend on Gnutella or Kazaa to download free Time-Warner content, is an additional 600 megabytes of space for you to use in pirating Time-Warner's top-notch content.

      Thank you again for choosing AOL.

  64. 5 years ago... by JooBYE · · Score: 0

    I didn't mind it too much when they gave out floppies.
    At least you could reuse them.

  65. 1000 Hours by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favorite part of the 1000 free hours campaign was when they were offering 1000 free hours (to be used in one month).

    Hmmm... 31 x 24 = 744

    Wasn't long before they changed to 1000 free hours (to be used in 45 days).

    I guess MA101 isn't required for a Marketing major

  66. what I did by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 5, Funny

    I covered 55 aol disks with fondu fuel and burned them into one mass of metal. I know use it as a paperweight.

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    1. Re:what I did by LinuxGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok, I modded you up, but when I post this it will take away the point. Now, where can we find a pic of your sister?? :)

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:what I did by MyHair · · Score: 2

      I covered 55 aol disks with fondu fuel and burned them into one mass of metal.

      A CD = polycarbonate + Mylar film layer + printing ink/plastic/whatever

      Is there metal in Mylar? I did a quick Google search and several sites say it's a reflective plastic.

      55 burning CDs soudns like bad news. Kids, don't try this at home!

    3. Re:what I did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know use it as a paperweight The readers are sometimes worse then the editors :-)

    4. Re:what I did by otisaardvark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you REALLY want to see a picture of his sister, given his name is GoatSheepPig?

    5. Re:what I did by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      Why not? She couldn't possibly be worse than some of the girls I've ended up with after a night of heavy drinking. I almost signed up for AOL too.

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  67. slow by WhiteChocolate42 · · Score: 1

    So it's been what, a year now that these guys have been at it, and they've managed to collect 64,000 cds. At this rate, they'll be done in around 15 years. Whoopee. I'll be fairly surprised if in the year 2017 A) dial-up still exists, and B) CD-ROMs are still the media of choice for this crap.

  68. Skeet Shooting? by DSL-Admin · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should donate them to chairty and let the country folk use them for skeet practice with shotguns.. I know they make nice self destructing frisbees when you throw them hard enough... I actually have a 6.0 disc right here holding up my coffee cup....

  69. So... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2, Redundant

    What is stopping them from kindly taking the returned CDs and SENDING THEM BACK OUT? Are they destroying the CDs somehow?

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    1. Re:So... by beanyk · · Score: 1
      What is stopping them from kindly taking the returned CDs and SENDING THEM BACK OUT? Are they destroying the CDs somehow?


      Yes. RTFA -- second-last paragraph.
  70. 1025 hours.. by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1
    is 42 days, 17 hours... out of 45 days

    I guess they want you to use the remaining time to bath?

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  71. I've never gotten one! by xTown · · Score: 1

    I must be lucky or something, because I have never, ever, not once, received an AOL CD in the mail. Other people in my apartment building do--I see them set out for return all the time--but I never have.

    What they need to do with those million CDs is not to return them in bulk, but return them seriatim.

    1. Re:I've never gotten one! by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Not even AOL wants you? Hey, thanks. That really helps my self-esteem. :)

  72. Me too by Reziac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Back in the floppy era (when diskettes cost a buck apiece), whenever we ran out of good reliable disks, we'd call AOL and ask them to send us a set of install disks. Over the next year they'd send us a good double handful of Officially Blank disks. AOL's diskettes were always top quality!

    Now, whenever we run out of nifty DVD cases ... heh heh heh.

    Oh, and the CDs work great to chase away starlings and gophers -- just hang 'em where they'll twirl in the wind. Nice of AOL to print 'em in all those pretty colours.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  73. "No credit card needed" my backside! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the flaw with using the 1000 free hours, as suggested in the post: despite notice that a credit card is not needed on the AOL disks themselves, they refuse to let people sign on without a credit card unless they provide checking account information that allows them to pull directly out of your account.

    In essence, then, free != anonymous and easy.

  74. AOL disks and me... by waltc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I tried AOL for awhile back in 1995. Dropped it in 1996 and went to Earthlink because I realized I didn't need AOL--just access to the Internet. (Been on cable for the last couple of years.)

    At last count I had approaching 25 "come back to AOL disks." They do make good coasters, but I don't need 25 coasters...;) I continue to receive them on a regular basis.

    I've often wondered how much money AOL spends to send out these disks. Assuming a cost of $1 per disk, including postage (which might be low), AOL could be spending anywhere from $10M a year to $100M a year just sending out these disks and doing nothing else. Remarkable.

    I'd love to know the percentage of "hits" AOL gets on a mail-out like this. The company must certainly consider them successful as they've made no effort to cease and desist--just got another one a couple of weeks ago.

  75. What we should really do.. by override11 · · Score: 1

    Is get the address of the marketing director, and send them all to him / her. I bet THAT would stop it!! :)

    --
    No I didnt spell check this post...
    1. Re:What we should really do.. by xiaix · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Jan Brandt?

      --

      Have you read the Moderator Guidelines yet?

  76. Do the same thing with junk snail mail by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 5, Informative

    I saw an interesting e-mail the other day that proposed a solution to junk snail mail. Lots of companies send you junk mail with a postage-paid reply envelope, right? If you take that envelope and stuff it with unrelated junk mail from a different company, seal it up and send it on it's merry way, the junk mailer pays the postage TWICE (once to you, and again back to them), you force them to sort through their mailbox just like you do, and you help out the cash-strapped U.S. Postal Service at the same time.

    1. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by sehryan · · Score: 2

      I know people who have done that, except go to more extremes. Like stuffing a ziplock bag of speghetti in one, or taking it and taping it to a brick. I don't know if it actually goes, but its a funny idea.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    2. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by qurob · · Score: 1


      Lots of companies send you junk mail with a postage-paid reply envelope, right? If you take that envelope and stuff it with unrelated junk mail from a different company, seal it up and send it on it's merry way, the junk mailer pays the postage TWICE

      C'mon dude, I can barely pay my credit card bill, much less shell out 37 cents for a stamp. I like Business Reply Mail.

      I wholly support doing it to AOL, whilst helping out a worthy cause like the USPS.

    3. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by scrytch · · Score: 2

      I saw an interesting e-mail the other day that proposed a solution to junk snail mail. Lots of companies send you junk mail with a postage-paid reply envelope, right? If you take that envelope and stuff it with unrelated junk mail from a different company, seal it up and send it on it's merry way, the junk mailer pays the postage TWICE (once to you, and again back to them), you force them to sort through their mailbox just like you do, and you help out the cash-strapped U.S. Postal Service at the same time.

      This is a myth, usually of the "tape it to a brick" variety. If you make it go over the prepaid postage amount, they will simply trash it.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    4. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

      Like, dude, maybe you didn't read the "postage-paid envelope" part of my post. You don't pay a dime. The company that provides the POSTAGE-PAID envelope pays everything.

    5. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

      Easy solution: don't stuff too much back in the envelope. Maybe send some other company's credit card application or the like. Keep the weight the same as what they expect to receive and nobody will know the difference until they open it up. ;-)

    6. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by qurob · · Score: 1


      Lets say, Citibank starts getting thousands of these things. They might start NOT including postage paid envelopes.

    7. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

      Good point, but then they have to (possibly) deal with less business. Whatever the case, it's fun to send junk mail back to junk mailers!

    8. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by jred · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but if you can't afford 37 cents to return a CC app/bill, you probably shouldn't have a credit card.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    9. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      After my credit rating hit the shits, I started to get a whole lot more credit offers. Loans, credit cards etc. They don't make much money when you pay of the balance each month.

      I especially like the "get yourself out of dept with a loan, and why not put a little on top and get a holiday" ones.

    10. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Yup, the lose money as well because they pay someone to open them.

      Don't put nasty things in though. The person that opens them gets paid bugger-all, gets treated like shit and it isn't their fault. If anything, put in something that might make them smile!

    11. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or return the card that came with it, circle your name and address, and write "Remove from mailing list." on it.

    12. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by Rinikusu · · Score: 2

      You know, I keep hearing that "oh, he's just a paid person, following orders, it's not his fault" argument all the time...

      You know, all those Germans in WWII were "just following orders" at the point of a gun. In America, if you don't agree with the morality of the company you work for, you can quit and find another job.

      I don't buy "It's just my job" bullshit, although I hate my job, too. If the company in question found it hard to find workers, then they'd have to increase wages or start modifying their behavior to attract employees, even of the lowest type...

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    13. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Try letting your wife and kids go hungry for a few days and without warm clothing for a few months and see how adverse you are to taking a job at AOL if that is all that's available. Some people don't have a choice.

    14. Re:Do the same thing with junk snail mail by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Your comparing office workers to socially brainwashed nazi soldiers?

      The people working in these maildrops probably have limited visibility of the level of junk mail being sent out by their company, as well as having timed bathroom breaks.Cut them some slack, they gotta eat.

      The Nazi soldiers weren't motivated by someone pointing a gun at them, they were led to that course of action (war) by carefully crafted political propaganda. Much like the modern world, but anyway... ;-)

      (By the way, you're also able to quit your job in other countries, not just "In America")

  77. Good for decorating with by dlc915 · · Score: 1

    I'm not giving up the AOL discs I have recieved in the mail.
    I have found them instead, to be very usefully in helping me balance the feng shui in my dorm room.

    --
    I still haven't found the "any" key.
  78. I remember the good old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    AOL used to send me floppy disks - I got so many that I hardly ever had to actually buy blank disks.

    Unfortunately, the labels were really difficult to get off neatly, so I ended up just sticking address labels over them instead.

    Ahhh, good old days. Pity you can't do anything really useful with the CDs. Why don't they put the latest Linux kernel or some GNU programs on them as well, because the discs usually have loads of free space on them. That way, people would keep them around instead of throwing them away - and if they keep them, then there is more chance that they might actually use them...

  79. How does this help? by bdoliver · · Score: 1

    Always remember any press is a good thing, if they actually manage to do this it will generate loads of press. I'm not seeing how they are sticking it to them.

  80. 'Editors' by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

    Because the so-called 'Editors' don't actually do any editing. All they do is pick stories.

    What slashdot need is a couple of real editors who regard quality stories, lack of duplication etc as their top priority, and let CmdrTaco, Michael, Timothy et al can get back to what they're good at - the technical side of running /.

  81. Sugar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. If you have the Sugar, then you depose the monarchy, and then you apply for US statehood.

  82. DVD Case? by nuggz · · Score: 2

    Now, whenever we run out of nifty DVD cases ... heh heh heh.

    DVD cases, I get my AOL CD either shrink wrapped, or in a cardboard pouch, not a DVD case.

    I just bought a box of 100 CD envelopes (transparent face) for $5, thanks, I'll try and survive without AOL.

    1. Re:DVD Case? by athakur999 · · Score: 2

      I occasionally get AOL CD's in a nice little tin boxes. It's actually quite useful...

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    2. Re:DVD Case? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      You're getting ripped off :) Mine usually come in either the nifty tin box, or a nice plastic DVD case. I hardly ever get the naked shrinkwrapped package!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:DVD Case? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      CD envelopes are no replacement for DVD cases or jewel boxes.

      The DVD cases are especially useful for mailing CD-Rs to people. Every time I get an AOL cd in a DVD case, I open it, throw out the CD and all the crap, and keep the DVD case for just this purpose.

      I wish AOL would just send me empty DVD cases.

    4. Re:DVD Case? by foonie · · Score: 1

      I prefer paper CD cases. They work great for mailing CD-Rs, and you save on postage.

  83. Whats your problem with AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You act as if AOL wronged you in some way.

    My guess is that you signed up for AOL thinking it would be really fast internet service and have been peeved and embarrased ever since.

    Get over it.

  84. Million Modem march by bubblegoose · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours. A million people do *that* and I bet they'd stop filling our mailboxes with the landfill of tomorrow."

    How about we follow through on that idea? How about Monday October 28th at 8PM we dial in using the free hours and start downloading huge files, for as long as you can stand tying up your phone line. We can continue every night at 8 PM for the next 2 weeks.

    Do that for two weeks...what do you think that will do to the already floundering AOL?

    I know you must provide a CC # to sign up, we'll just have to ensure that we all cancel service within the first month. Anyone had experience cancelling AOL service? Is it hard?

    I'm sure most of us could find an old machine to do this on.

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
    1. Re:Million Modem march by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Submit this to slashdot as a story. Even if 10% of slashdotters joined in, that would be a HUGE number of calls.

    2. Re:Million Modem march by m.e.l.l.e.n.t.i.n.e · · Score: 1

      You don't need a credit card according to this ad on the AOL site.

      --

      Producer: NEXT!!
      Ralph Wiggum: Chicken necks
    3. Re:Million Modem march by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't automatically cancel - gotta call em and have one of their bitches try to talk you out of cancelling.

    4. Re:Million Modem march by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really willing to install that junk on a computer? I wouldn't wish such a thing on even a lowly 486

    5. Re:Million Modem march by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      I know you must provide a CC # to sign up . . .

      I think they started not requiring the CC #. I don't know, I've never dialed in, but I think their ads even tout that now.

    6. Re:Million Modem march by hajibaba · · Score: 1

      Well, if you don't have a CC# then you have to give them a checking account number (which they charge extra for). Or at least that's how it was a few months ago when my in-laws tried it.

    7. Re:Million Modem march by Natchswing · · Score: 1
      > Anyone had experience cancelling AOL service? Is it hard?

      Very. Jon Katz already had one article about it.

      Here's my story:

      --
      I called AOL to cancel my free subscription today. Being out in BFE stuck in a hotel room, it was nice to be able to get some sort of internet connection. However, now that I'm home I don't need it anymore.

      When I called AOL to cancel my account, I had to choose the "press 3 to try and cancel your subscription with us." I pressed three and sat on hold listening to advertisements until I got hung up on. After a second call and a second volley of advertisements I got a salesman that was eager to help me. He got my personal information and verified that I was the owner of the account I was trying to cancel.

      At that point the salesman began to ask me why I was canceling my AOL service. I don't mind answering a few minor questions, they have to ask them to better suit their service to customers. He asked about my home service. "Oh, you have DSL at home? So that highspeed is important to you? Have you looked into AOL's DSL service?" *insert sales pitch* "What do you use your home internet connection for?" *insert sales pitch* "Did you use the keyword feature of AOL?" *insert sales pitch* "Did you know that AOL allows you to create your own homepage?" *insert sales pitch* "Did you know that you can get music and videos through AOL by going to..." *insert sales pitch* "Have you tried using AOL at home?" *insert sales pitch* "Did you know that AOL offers a special section for broadband users..."

      At this point, just over 20 minutes on the phone with this guy, I finally hung up because I felt that I wasn't going to get the cancellation confirmation.
      --

      I finally faxed a request to AOL and then called the credit card company and reported the card lost so they'd cancel it. I got a call at work about a month later from AOL trying to get me to sign back up. Sheesh.

    8. Re:Million Modem march by doubtless · · Score: 2

      After moving to a new place and needed to go online desperately, I did use the free AOL hours.

      They either requires your CC#, or they will charge through your phone company directly and reflect on your phone bill.

      After a couple of weeks, it got on my nerve and I decided to cancel their service. The speed was decent, but I just can't stand the bloatware, and the inability to share the connection without using any 3rd party proxy. (AOL disabled the handy right click on connection, so you can't choose 'share this internet connection')

      The process was rather straight forward (u know, the usual automated maze until you can reach a rep), the rep asked me the reason, and I just told him I couldn't share the connection. The account was promptly cancelled, but if you try using the same account and password to login to AOL again, it _will_ work, and they will promptly reinstate your account, up to a month anyway. This mean that AOL will still store your CC# (if you provided one) for at least a month upon your canceling their service.

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
    9. Re:Million Modem march by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      How about Monday October 28th at 8PM we dial in using the free hours and start downloading huge files,

      Install Gentoo Linux. :-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  85. Re:Strangely, some collect AOL discs like comic bo by Reziac · · Score: 2

    I don't go that far, but I've found it behooves me to keep one of each different edition (they are not all the same binaries, even with the same version number) since you never know when some AOL-using client will need a reinstall and only ONE particular version gets along with their system. Easiest method is just save one of each different-coloured CD.

    We always checked the older versions (floppy and early CDROM) for nifty undocumented utilities, sometimes discovering files like findport.com (useful little modem detection program).

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  86. more effective by WhiteChocolate42 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be more effective to just stamp "return to sender" on the thing right when you get it? No postage fees. Personally, I've always enjoyed using them to play "Hallway Death Frisbee"- it's like dodgeball, but with more chaos and greater injury potential.

    1. Re:more effective by adamjone · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it would be just the same as if you threw it in the trash. AOL ships the CDs 4th class mail, which means that if you mark it return to sender, the USPS returns it to the earth.

    2. Re:more effective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points I would mod you up. =)

  87. AOL SPAM IS by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Supported by the USPO. My friend just changed his address, and in changing his address the Post Office sends you a "Welcome to your new Address" package thing. Inside of it was an AOL 1000 free hours disk - with "welcome to your new address" or some such slogan printed on it.

    Lame. I dont need the post office advertising my new address to companies (dont knwo if it actually does that though)

    But what if you changed email addresses or ISPs and the new ISP or email provider would then send you a welcome email, and you would also receive a bunch of other spam emails from spammers saying "Welcome to your new Email account. Get a bigger penis free by clicking here"

    I hope AOL eats it.

    1. Re:AOL SPAM IS by retro128 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is a good article about that.
      Anyone who's planning on moving soon (like me) could most definitely use some of this info.

      --
      -R
    2. Re:AOL SPAM IS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      If you submit a change of address for less than one year it is considerred temporary -- they will forward mail to you for the time selected.

      Make it "permanent" and they forward mail to you for 1 year, inform senders of your new address, AND put your old & new adddress into a database that is sold.

      To eliminate dead-tree spam make your change of address temporary -- for 364 days.

    3. Re:AOL SPAM IS by Snowdog668 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure that the USPS sells the addresses gained from Change of Address cards. How else do you explain the fact that when I move I get tons of junk mail properly addressed my new address months before I can get my regular bills and stuff straightened out? Another bit of 'proof', when I moved several years ago I didn't file a Change of Address card (my old address was at my mother's and I figured I could pick up mail there until all the important stuff followed). I very rarely had junkmail at that address and *never* had it the first few months I was there. My wife, who did file a change of address card, was swamped with junkmail within weeks.

      --
      I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
  88. I love it when AOL sends me these... by Mark+Garrett · · Score: 1
    A free DVD case and a free throwing disc? What's not to love about that?!

    Now back in the day when they were just sending out the discs*, that was less useful. There's only so much entertainment you can get out of throwing a CD around until it expoldes. However, with the DVD case thrown in, it's well worth the time involved in tearing the plastic off.

    * (Yes, that's after the day when they were sending out floppies, I know.)

  89. But will it matter? by wls · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a dumpster diver, let me say that when AOL used to send out floppy diskettes, that when they did a software update they just threw the old labeled and unlabeled media out by the thousands. I have boxes and boxes of rescued AOL floppies that I reformat when I need to pass out a small file over old media.

    Given that they treated reusable media with such discontempt, it only makes sense that they are already accustomed to disposing large quantities of non-reusable media.

    Will this action even be a blip on their radar? Probablly not, unless environmentalists and the media are dragged into the lot.

    1. Re:But will it matter? by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

      As a dumpster diver

      *sniff* *sniff*

      What's that smell?

    2. Re:But will it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to go diving into trash, that's your business. I have one suggestion, however. For several years now we have been playing with the concept of networking computers together for distribution of files. It works great!

    3. Re:But will it matter? by Fred+Tourette · · Score: 1

      "Will this action even be a blip on their radar? Probablly not, unless environmentalists and the media are dragged into the lot."

      Well there ya go. Here's where consolidation can come back and bite AOL-TW in the ass.

      On the one hand, we have _Time_ magazine going on the occasional "Be good to the earth" campaign (with ads for Ford Expeditions sprinkled throughout, but that's another irony), telling us how to recycle, produce less waste, etc.

      On the other hand, we have America Online, sending out tons (literally) of unwanted CD-ROMs which end up in landfills.

    4. Re:But will it matter? by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      Given that they treated reusable media with such discontempt

      I think you mean contempt.

      It's quite comment at computer fairs to get offers of 50 floppies for $5 and suchlike. Wen you get them home, you find they have old drivers on them.

      I've always assumed that the companies bulk-buy floppies from the manufacturer, who puts the data on them. It takes ages while to clear a floppy and put all-new data on it, and if you had to do 10,000 of them, it would take bloody hours... it simply doesn't make sense for a company to reuse floppies.

      Cheers,

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    5. Re:But will it matter? by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      Right.... Only the very small (usually shareware) operations would bother re-using a floppy disk.

      These days, it probably costs little more for a floppy disk than it does to print a single flyer on a piece of paper. The real cost is in the labor/time to format a disk or write data to them.

      I'm sure the biggest reason, truth be told, that someone like AOL would just throw out all their old disks is because the labels don't come off cleanly or easily. If the disks had no labels stuck to them, they could probably sell the whole lot to a company that would resell the bulk disks. (I remember ordering bulk floppies before that said they were "recycled" and "re-certified" to be error free.)

      Who wants to sit around and carefully peel away thousands of AOL labels from floppies though, to make them resellable?

  90. Wouldn't it be a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to have the individual users return the discs to AOL? AOL can easily ignore the one time dump of a million discs, but if they get'em on a continuing basis, it could be a tad irritating.

  91. I you really wanted to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I you really wanted to give AOL a taste of their own medicine, you could call them and say "Hey AOL, take me off your mailing list."

    Or you could waste countless hours proving how elite you think you are.

    Find a new battle losers; AOL never misrepresented that it was the EASIEST, not the most technosavvy.

  92. WOW! by omegakidd · · Score: 0

    I think I am going to go to stores that have piles upon piles of AOL cd's and take them all. Then I will send all of them to the people at http://www.nomoreaolcds.com/ . I could probably get about 500 cd's.

  93. Regular mail costs? Who cares? by ylikone · · Score: 1

    I haven't used "regular mail" in about 2 years now. The postal service is a thing of the past.

    --
    Meh.
  94. Using the free hours by -Nails- · · Score: 1

    seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours. A million people do *that* and I bet they'd stop filling our mailboxes with the landfill of tomorrow

    Many years ago before I knew better I used AOL's free hours to get myself started on using the internet. I used the free hours off of one disc and cancelled the account. A month or so later I did the same thing again, I didn't even use all of the free hours before I found a good local ISP and cancelled the account. AOL billed the credit card after the account was cancelled. We called them up and the cancelled the charges and happily billed us again the next month. After much hassle we finally got the situation resolved. If a million people got billed like I did, how much interest would AOL get before they refunded the credit cards?

    -Nails-

    1. Re:Using the free hours by glenstar · · Score: 1

      On a business trip one time I found myself without access to any dialup other than AOL. I signed up for the free account and cancelled the next week when I returned home. The bills kept coming from AOL. Every month they would bill and every month I would call Amex and have the bill removed. I finally, god's honest truth, cancelled the Amex card just to make it go away.

  95. And if you would like to participate by piznut · · Score: 1
    Here's the original website for these guys.


    http://www.nomoreaolcds.com/

  96. Repeat story... by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this a repeat story when Slashdot posted about it a couple years ago?

  97. regarding your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you want performance to price ratio, not price to performance (which would be 0 instead of divide by zero error)

  98. floppies by intermodal · · Score: 4, Funny

    I liked it when they sent me free floppies...those i could use for something more than my can of coke

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  99. My latest collection by Mailloop+Trooper · · Score: 1


    I used to do the coaster thing too. Really handy.

    But more recently I have started to treat them as a collection and keep them unopened. If you look, you'll notice a lot of variety and some of them are pretty cool.

    Imagine that, a collection that grows for free and delivered to my mailbox!

  100. Where to get them? by Pupp3tM · · Score: 2

    If you go to computer stores like CompUSA where they give out free AOL discs, you can ask them for boxes they have in the back (that's hundreds at a time). Ought to get you to a million quicker.

    --
    "Time is an illusion.
    Lunchtime doubly so."
    -Douglas Adams

    David Borowitz
  101. Better keep them in the basement by sympleko · · Score: 1

    According to these guys, a typical CD weighs 2/3 of an ounce.

    That means 10^6 CDs weigh nearly 41,6667 pounds.

    Extra credit: what's the minimum amount of space they would take up? Remember that they are round so this is harder than just calculating the volume.

    1. Re:Better keep them in the basement by Terralthra · · Score: 1

      Well, their diameter is approx. 4.7 in, pi*r^2 makes their top area approx. 17.34 in, * their height of 1/16 in = approx 1.08 in^3.

      And the method of holding them to take up the least amount of volume would be simply to stack them one on top of the other, for approx 1087390.5 in^3, or 627.19 ft^3.

      For comparison, if one were to put them in stacks of (random) 1600 and box them in rows and columns of said stacks, each column would be 8 and 1/3 feet tall, and there would be 625 of them. In a grid arrangement, 25x25, this would take up approximately 1380625 in^3, 798.97 ft^3.

      I'm sure one could be more efficent and work the grid out hexagonally, right? As it turns out, yes. An equilateral hexagonal pyramid containing and bounding a standard CD is approximately 1.1956 in^3 (you can check my math if you want), times the million = 1195656.1 in^3, or 691.93 ft^3. Not quite as good as one huge stack of them, but damn close, and a lot better than a horizontal/vertical grid.

      And yes, I seem to be happy to do math.


      --
      -Terralthra...
    2. Re:Better keep them in the basement by sympleko · · Score: 1

      Verr Naas. How tall is it then?

    3. Re:Better keep them in the basement by Terralthra · · Score: 1

      Well, 1,000,000 CDs x 1/16th in is about 5,208 feet tall. Bit hard to move without tipping over, I'd think.

      Counter-intuitively, perhaps, the height of the stack in either square or hex grids does not matter...a set of 6250 stacks of 160 CDs takes up the exact same volume (given rounding errors) as 625 stacks of 1600 CDs. Wasted volume is wasted volume.


      --
      -Terralthra...
    4. Re:Better keep them in the basement by sympleko · · Score: 1


      Well, 1,000,000 CDs x 1/16th in is about 5,208 feet tall. Bit hard to move without tipping over, I'd think.


      Yeah, that's roughly 4 times as tall as the tallest building on earth.

      Counter-intuitively, perhaps, the height of the stack in either square or hex grids does not matter...a set of 6250 stacks of 160 CDs takes up the exact same volume (given rounding errors) as 625 stacks of 1600 CDs. Wasted volume is wasted volume.

      I was just wondering about it given my original post -- can you fit this pyramid in your basement?
      Probably. I guess the volume problem is not as big as the weight problem.

      And now that we've beat this topic into the ground, I'm going home.

  102. Why stop at CDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got my self in the habit of ALWAYS sealing and sending back empty envelopes of all the credit company ads that offer "new, exciting credit limits".

    They pay the postage that way, plus I waste their time in having them open them empty envelopes ;)

    Wanna join me?

    1. Re:Why stop at CDs? by Kredal · · Score: 3

      why send the envelopes back empty? Stuff them with other junk mail or candy wrappers or whatever... make them pay even more.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  103. Helmet by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 1

    I use mine to coat my foil helmet with them. It works even better now. ;)

  104. More Creative Uses by dprior · · Score: 1

    I once got 18 AOL Discs in one day when I was living in my apartment at college. It wasn't that the postal worker got tired of sticking them in everyone's box and just shoved them in mine... they were all addressed to me. 18 in one Day and then 7 more 3 days later.

    My roomates and I were having a halloween party that week so we gave the first 25 people to show a nice new AOL CD in a DVD Case.

    How the hell did I get 25 CD's in one week??

  105. they slashdot users? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Perhaps this is the ultimate play for big-time Karma

    1. Re:they slashdot users? by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      Close, but: for the most possible Karmic experience, they would be emailing them to Redmond. :)

  106. Paging Craig Shergold by camusflage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Craig Shergold is seven years old and suffering from terminal cancer. It is his ambition to be included in the Guinness Book of Records for the largest number of AOL CD's ever collected by one person.
    Craig would be grateful if you could send all of your AOL CD's to the address below and also send the enclosed pages, including one of your own, to another ten companies.
    Obviously, speed is of the essence....
    Craig Shergold
    c/o Steve Case
    22000 AOL Way
    Dulles, VA 20166

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  107. Kinda funny by rsax · · Score: 1

    Anyone else find it amusing that this story is on cnn.com , part of the whole Time Warner (AOL) network? This is something I would have expected to see on msnbc.com instead. Oh well I agree with another /. poster here, rather than waste money and send the CD's to some other address it would be better to just write "Return to sender", return them straight to AOL instead and let them pick up the tab.

  108. AOL is sucks!what you can do with ther cd rom bisk by firehousefive · · Score: 1

    :cost to mutch :it suck :no good :send to many disk. :Me and my friends took a bisk and lit it on fire and froze it :slamed it angaisnt the boor.

  109. I like getting aol CDs.... by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    as long as they come in nice tins or other mailable cases. I'm always needing containers to mail CD's to my friends in.

    --
    I do security
  110. The flip side by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Funny

    So what you're saying is, we could stop receiving spam in our mailbox forever if we would just pay more for a stamp?

    I'M SOLD!

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  111. I don't mind them. by nooboob · · Score: 1

    Strip the cases of AOL markings (easy to do, as it's paper inserted behind plastic) and you have a hella sturdy black cd case, sturdier than the ones that come with cd-rs. yippee.

  112. Mozilla by rasterboy · · Score: 1

    Don't mess with AOL, cuz when you mess with AOL, you mess with Mozilla. Maybe they should put copies of Mozilla on every AOL CD? Who wouldn't appreciate getting Mozilla binaries on CD delivered to their house each month?

    --
    ...end of transmission...
  113. The URL? by colerit · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does anyone else think it's funny that this article (published by a subsidiary of AOL) doesn't give the URL of the website that they specifically mentioned?
    Well, I found it - http://www.nomoreaolcds.com

    so there =P

    1. Re:The URL? by Kredal · · Score: 2

      or AOL Keyword: nomoreaolcds

      Just trying to be helpful. (:

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    2. Re:The URL? by Kalgash · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did you happen to see the link in the little "Related" box on the bottom right hand side of the article? CNN.com's new style guide places all links for the story outside the main body text as they feel different coloured links distract from readability.

  114. "one million" is a big number. by NFW · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If they want to get this done in ten years, they will need to collect over 270 CDs per day, every day, for the next ten years. AOL may send out far more than that, but they will have a hard time getting that many people to play this game.

    I'll wager AOL gives up the CD campaign before they reach their mark, leaving these guys with a really big pile of CDs, and no campaign to protest.

    Don't get me wrong, I do think it's a neat idea, I just think they set their sights a couple orders of magnitude higher than is practical.

    --
    Build stuff. Stuff that walks, stuff that rolls, whatever.
    1. Re:"one million" is a big number. by YourGarbageMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the site they started on August 1st, 2001. So far they have collected ~64,000 cds. At that rate it should take them around 20 years.

      http://www.nomoreaolcds.com/

  115. Actually, it is there by RadioheadKid · · Score: 2

    Look to the right of the article in the Related box...

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  116. Consequences by doublem · · Score: 2

    48 hours after the CDs are returned to AOL, they will be recycled.

    One Million will receive the pre-owned CD.

    And the complaint calls will begin, and somoene at AOL will remember the line from the article that says:

    "McKenna and Lieberman scratch the CDs so they can't be sent out again and then they loop them on string"

    And AOL sends them out anyway.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Consequences by IamSorrow · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If you took the time to read the article you would have noticed that they score/cut the CD to prevent the media from being used again.

    2. Re:Consequences by doublem · · Score: 2

      If you'd read my post you'd know that I quoted the portion of the article where they say score the CD, and that I claimed tat AOL would get a slew of tech calls as a result of recycling damaged CDs.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  117. You, sir, are under arrest by nahdude812 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is illegal to publish plans for making weapons of mass destruction under the US Patriot Act. Please report to your local police station for incarceration.

    1. Re:You, sir, are under arrest by Parsa · · Score: 1

      "..Publish plans for making weapons of mass destruction..."

      Does this mean you can't publish how to make them? Or you can publish how you just can't publish what you're planning on doing with it?

      --
      Abiit, excessit, evasit, erupit.
    2. Re:You, sir, are under arrest by HappyCycling · · Score: 1, Funny

      >>>It is illegal to publish plans for making weapons of mass destruction under the US Patriot Act. Please report to your local police station for incarceration.>>> don't you mean incineration?

    3. Re:You, sir, are under arrest by Puk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>>It is illegal to publish plans for making weapons of mass destruction under the US Patriot Act. Please report to your local police station for incarceration.>>> don't you mean incineration?

      The moderation system needs a "+1 Scarily Appropriate".

      -Puk

    4. Re:You, sir, are under arrest by The_Guv'na · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please report to your local police station for incarceration.

      ...and some rubber glove love!

  118. Yawn by nugneant · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Something tells me this plan will fall through without anything being done...

    Not to mention, okay, collect AOL discs, send them back to AOL... hmm now, AOL now has 1 million discs which didn't reach new users. Hmmm... LET'S SEND THOSE PONIES RIGHT BACK UP! THANK YOU GENTS FOR THE SURPLUS!

    The entire thing just seems a bit pointless at best, counter productive at worst.

    Just my $0.02

    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LET'S SEND THOSE PONIES RIGHT BACK OUT! THANK YOU GENTS FOR THE SURPLUS

      teach me to /. right after getting up. murmurmurmurmurmurmur...where'z d' coffeeeeeee...ggggrrrrrrrrrr

    2. Re:Yawn by IamSorrow · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you took the time to read the article you would have noticed that they score the CD to prevent the media from being used again.

    3. Re:Yawn by nugneant · · Score: 1

      Do you think AOL would really care?

      It'd just acquaint new users even quicker to the famous AOL quality control standards!

  119. Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know if this is still true (the last time I used AOL was about '94), but once you started using the free hours, AOL needed a credit card number. Just in case you, uh, go over the limit. What they didn't tell you is that if you did go over the limit, you wouldn't be notified; they just quietly started billing you.

    Ah, gees, I feel so sorry for you. C'mon! This company is giving you free internet access and now you expect/demand them to send you a curtousy message when you're approaching the magic 1000 hours? I don't see why they are under any obligation to provide this warning service to you. Sure, it would be awfully sweet of them to do so. But, seriously, you should be able to determine after A FEW HOURS if you like the service or not! If you're trying to play some kind of game of getting as close to 1000 hours without going over then I would argue you're really taking advantage of them. Go ahead and do that if you want to 'stick it to the man' but don't be upset when the company doesn't provide warning services to allow you to screw them over more effectively. Gees, how hard is it to write down a log of how many hours on a piece of paper by the computer so you can keep track of this yourself? Accept some responsibility for your actions.

    Looking through the comments here I see a lot of "heh-heh, let's stick it to AOL" messages. Why do people hate AOL? Does anyone have a LEGITIMATE REASON for hating them? And I mean something more important than "I don't like getting those disks in the mail". There are lots of evil entities out there in the tech world. Does AOL really deserve to be place side by side with Microsoft et. al in the Technology Hall of Shame? AOL has been responsible for helping millions of people discover the internet.

    GMD

  120. Seriously, AOL CDs/Disks are sometimes useful by phorm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The CD's make decent coasters. If you have some acrylic paint you can paint 'em and they actually look quite cool. Getting a whole crapload of these in a month is annoying though. However, on to use #2

    My last AOL CD came with a rather nice thick plastic black case. This case is similar to the ones used with most DVD's. I wish they'd send me more CD's with these cases, as I tend to have a case shortage (buy my CD-R's in 50-packs) quite often. Take off the logo'ed AOL paper and these are great for putting discs in when I lend them to friends etc.

    AOL disks. The most useful things that AOL used to send. While I rarely use disks anymore, I used to have a small stack of post-AOL formatted diskettes.

    Can anyone tell me where I sign up for more free coasters/cases/disks, I'm running low again?

    p.s. AOL CD-holders were also nice for storing disks that you don't want people to pick up, few people open an AOL CD-case.

    1. Re:Seriously, AOL CDs/Disks are sometimes useful by dipfan · · Score: 2, Funny

      p.s. AOL CD-holders were also nice for storing disks that you don't want people to pick up, few people open an AOL CD-case.

      Woah! Isn't there a bigger danger that people just throw them in the trash?

    2. Re:Seriously, AOL CDs/Disks are sometimes useful by Eamon+C · · Score: 1

      The stainless steel cases they send out are also very nice. I don't like carrying a CD-wallet-full of music with me, I by the thought of at once losing hundreds of dollars worth of music that took years to collect. AOL's stainless steel boxes comfortably hold four or five disks, and with the paint removed, they look very sharp.

    3. Re:Seriously, AOL CDs/Disks are sometimes useful by phorm · · Score: 1

      I've never seen the stainless steel case. Damn, now I really want to be on the list!

      Any possibility you could post or email a picture?

      The scary part is the amount of money they're throwing out there on fancy advertisement casings.

  121. Environmental charges? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't the unsolicited distribution of millions of plastic disks (CD's) be considered an environmentally toxic "dump"?

    I would think the inablity of these disks to biodegrade would be a more substantial hazard than almost any oil spill....

    -dano

  122. Plenty to go around by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1
    You can find 'em at your local US Post Office.

    You can find 'em in the checkout aisles at Home Depot, Lowe's, WalMart, Sam's Club, etc.

    I usually grab a bundle and chuck 'em in the trash bin on the way out.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:Plenty to go around by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      "Does M$ have a monopoly? Just look at your keyboard."

      Not my keyboard... It is 20 years old, made by IBM, weights more than my desk, and has a great cilcky feel.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

  123. and here is how . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  124. Collect BFAs by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Funny

    How can I go about collecting Big Fucking Slashdot Ads so I can return a million of them to the advertisers?

  125. Re:Strangely, some collect AOL discs like comic bo by kfuq · · Score: 1

    Yah... those altoid can looking tins make great bud stash cans !! |-)

    --
    iF yOu WAnT to C YOUr iP agaIn gAThEr tWO MilLIon dOLLArS IN Non - cONsEcuTivE TweNtY's AnD AWaiT FuRThER iNstrUctIoN
  126. non-AOL country offerings.. by newr00tic · · Score: 1

    Ok, the weirdest "phree-internet-now" incident I've encountered was when AOL shipped their "get online, free hours"-CDs to me who lives in Sweden (SE). As some of you might know; AOL can not be used within this country! This is a useless way to crap up their company budget..

    I can understand that their CDs are not removed from the cover of U.S. computer magazines sold here (to avoid the hassle it produces for the magazine publishers), but the blatant snailmailing of unaccesible stuff to other countries is quite sad..

    ps; If moderated at all, please file this post as "funny" and not "informative". Even though I was wrongly targeted for this AOL spam, I thought it was funny as hell at the same time..

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  127. Old news + Stupid by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    AOL sends out millions of discs every _Month_, trucking back a mere million discs is nothing but a waste of money. Especially when AOL just says 'Go Away'.
    Also take into account that this campaign to raise a million discs to send to AOL has been going on for YEARS. It just proves to AOL that their advertising is more effective than it is annoying.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  128. Ninja CDs! by Badmovies · · Score: 1

    I do not use them for coasters, but they make great throwing stars. Get a whole stack of them, burst into the workspace, and start dolling out flung death.

    Not recommended in china shops and try not to hit anyone in the face.

    --


    Andrew Borntreger
    Champion of cinematic disasters
  129. Re:Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL? by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AOL has been responsible for helping millions of people discover the internet.

    Just like Microsoft was responsible for helping millions of people discover PCs. In my opinion, AOL's product sucks, and those millions of people are dumber because of it. There are some good things about their service, but overall I think the internet as a community would be better off if AOL was simply an ISP rather than a content/software/advertising provider.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  130. Better idea... by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

    Use up the 1000 free hours first. You don't really need to use their service, just their access point. Next time I recieve an AOL disk, I'm giving Peng a whirl. Its a free Linux dialer using the AOL service. Not sure how good it is, I don't have an AOL disk handy.

    --
    -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
  131. Another good solution by BdosError · · Score: 2

    Get the government's attention. In Canada at least, mail to your Member of Parliament (federal representative) is free -- it doesn't require a stamp.

    Mail your AOL CDs (and other junk mail) to your MP. If they get enough, maybe they change the law.

    --
    Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
  132. Logistics by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Informative
    CD mass = ~15g.
    1,000,000 x 15g = 15,000 Kg
    15,000 Kg = ~ 16.5 Tons

    CD thickness = ~1mm, width = ~120mm
    1 stack = 1Km high.
    Stacked 3m high = 334 stacks (one with remainer), ~2m to a side

    Assuming I've done my math right, that's not going to fit any mailbox I've ever seen.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  133. AOL BISK POETRY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot one:

    http://www.mindspring.com/~lindellj/aol/scream/

    This is "Bisk Poetry", something inspired several years ago by a semi-literate post to alt.aol-sucks. VERY funny stuff. Just be careful not to hit your head "angaisnt the boor".

  134. AOL CDs = Art to Burn by TarPitt · · Score: 1
    Collect all the CDs. Make some sort of massive art work out of them - say a temple of greed, or a giant form of Steve Case.


    Take it to Black Rock Desert for the Burning Man Festival


    Burn it

    --
    If your children ever found out how lame you are, they'd murder you in your sleep
  135. College Internet by treegnome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, you don't need AOL's 1,000 free hours. I pay $35,000 a year for HIGH SPEED internet in my dorm room... then I get an education for free! What a deal!

  136. What I would do with them... by Alsee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always thought it would be cool to wallpaper my room with CDs (shiny side).

    The ultimate in geek sheik.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:What I would do with them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chic, dildo.

  137. Lame. by eatenn · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is lame. Who cares if AOL gets a big box of these things? "Hey, office bitch, go and throw that/those box(es) out." Problem solved.

    Find a mailing address for AOL and have people mail them to that address instead. Skip the middle-man. Have it on some significant date and make it a national holiday, preferably a Monday. I really hate Mondays.

    --
    "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
    1. Re:Lame. by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      Read the article before you make dumbass comments. They aren't mailing a box of them, they are delivering 1 million of them. Thats 17 tons of aol cds.

    2. Re:Lame. by eatenn · · Score: 1

      I repeat, "Office bitch, throw out all these AOL CDs." It'd be ten times more annoying if they're mailed seperately and over a long period of time, just like they do to us.

      And when you're calling someone a dumbass, don't post as Anonymous Coward, you anonymous coward.

      --
      "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
    3. Re:Lame. by IamSorrow · · Score: 1

      Ok Dumbass. Its not really that annoying to through out a few CD's a day, over at AOL i'm sure they have people who are paid minimum wage to clean up garbage. But on the other hand if they have to clean up 17 TONS of CD in one day, that becomes a logistical nightmare, assuming that they just dump the CD's in a pile(s). If we continue to save up, say 100,000 CD's and send them again and again eventually they will get the message.

    4. Re:Lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL will sue them for blocking access to their building. They will win too. You just wait.
      Oh, one last thing: you're a Dumbass too.

  138. AOL Disks For Experimentation by CognitiveFusion · · Score: 1

    I am experimenting with using waste CDs as an alternative to the common roofing shingle, and I have a few other ideas too... AOL is my largest contributor of raw materials! I sure would be sad to see those disks disappear altogether!

    --
    Fools ignore complexity; pragmatists suffer it; experts avoid it; geniuses remove it. ~A. Perlis
  139. missed opportunity by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    I am surprised that AOL competitors, like Earthlink, have not made fun of AOL disks in ads.

    For example, they could have a TV ad where the doorbell rings, and a guy in a bathrobe answers the door to see an AOL salesperson, who hands him an AOL disk.

    He says, "Thanks!, I'll put it over with the rest", and then show him place it onto a huge, tall pile of disks in the middle of the living room.

    Then the announcer says, "At Earthlink we spend your subsciption fee on better quality internet service, not silver christmas trees for Lance Statton."

    Well, you get the idea.

  140. Old by IVI4573R · · Score: 1

    These guys arn't the first who have come up with the idea. Check out http://www.nomoreaolcds.com. They are doing the same thing. I have even been collecting cds to send to them, have 300 already.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:Old by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      its the same guys.. did you read the linked article?

    2. Re:Old by IamSorrow · · Score: 1

      Ummm, I guess you didn't read the story at CNN, These are the same people that run www.nomoreaolcds.com, so these guys are the first who came up with the idea (or at least the first to actually start doing it) They currently have 64,346 CD collected, so just over 6.4% of the total required.

  141. AOL CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marketing like this is a desparate attempt by the larger ISPs to keep market share in the industry. AOL, Earthlink, etc. they all do this. Fact of the matter is, most serious geeks would rather have no net access than use AOL and their gated community ultra-gay gui interface. I would rather have NO net access than use AOL.

  142. It's called culture jamming... by drivers · · Score: 2

    specifically "detournement"... literally, to turn back. The act itself (depositing a bunch of useless media on the doorstep of AOL) is not necessarily meaningful... it is the fact that it says something about AOL's wasteful marketing tactics to everyone who participates in it or even hears about it. It takes their tactics and turns it against them. It could be coupled with some kind of media campaign to get the word out for maximum effectiveness, although I think their plan to get lots of people to send them disks IS a publicity campaign. It should work because the next time [possibily] millions of people get their next AOL cd they might actually think about it more than just "junk mail... toss it." It kind of forces people to ask "why?" Why does AOL keep sending these out at great expense to themselves? The best culture jams startle people into looking at something they took as mundane into something new. The detournement will work even if they never actually deliver the disks to AOL in the end.

  143. Use the 1000 free hours by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Funny

    seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours.

    Make a perl script that takes in the account number from the cd and automatically creates an account on AOL and logs in. Then the script should goto Google, search for the letter 'e' and then wget -r the Internet. You might want to send the output to /dev/null

    1. Re:Use the 1000 free hours by fritter · · Score: 3, Funny

      You might want to send the output to /dev/null

      Or stevecase@aol.com

      twice

  144. What ticks me off.. by JasonMaggini · · Score: 2, Interesting


    AOL sends out a lot of their discs in those nice plastic DVD cases (which I usually keep, tossing the CD and inserts).
    Warner Bros. DVD come in those cheap cardboard DVD cases.
    I'm not keeping the AOL CDs! Use the plastic cases for the movies! I wanna keep those!
    </RANT>

  145. Can someone write a script... by warpup · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could someone write a script that would log into AOL and use all 1000 hours of each of these disks? Since 1000 hours = 41.67 days you would need more than one computer making simultaneous connections to use all the time in one month. In my house I could dedicate 5 comps to the problem through a broadband router (would this count as a separate connection?) to use up all the time in 8 days 8 hours. If the script were written and posted to a popular website (example) I think that could go a long way to ending the free coaster flood.

    1. Re:Can someone write a script... by theperplepigg · · Score: 1
      i don't know if they changed it, but you used to be able to only have one screenname at one computer online at a time for an account. so, even though you can make like 7 screennames, only one of those could be online at once. therefore, i am pretty sure it would take you at least 1000 hours to use 1000 hours of aol time. plus, it seems like having more than one installation of aol on a computer caused screwy things to happen (and only one account per installation + guests). AND you have to use windows. this is not to say that scripts can't do it, you would just need x number of computers all running windows and all with a separate installation of aol (and prolly separate cc numbers?) speaking of which, i personally wouldn't want to put my CC # in a script, nor would it matter anyway, if i could only use it once.

      of course, you could always get a group of ninjas together with a truckload of aol cds, and a large amount of water-resistant glue, and go to aol headquarters and glue as many as possible to the side of the building at night (obviously, police would eventually be involved)...and remember to put the shiny side out so you blind all passer-bys the next day...making them even more disgusted with aol.

      or i could just be babbling, in order to escape working on my program....

      --paul

      --
      -- Every time you kill a kitten, God masturbates.
  146. Are you kidding!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Post Office gives bulk mailers like AOL a discount and then treats the mail the same way first class gets treated. If the USPS quit giving discounts to bulk mailers there would be less mail, fewer employees, fewer shipments, a leaner meaner postal service. The only reason they don't is because the postal worker unions would have a FIT. They need the volume.

    1. Re:Are you kidding!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can read the other six posts but I will post again anyway. Bulk mail is NOT handled like regular mail. It has strict guidelines it has to follow including being presorted and bar coded. Regular mail requires human intervention and relies on your sloppy hand writing. Since bulk mail is handled my machines there would no fewer employees if bulk mail stopped. The mailman is still going to deliver either way. The difference is you may have to pay about $2 for regular mail so that to justify sending the mailman to your house with one piece of mail.

  147. Math (was Re:Logistics) by Saib0t · · Score: 3, Informative
    15,000 Kg = ~ 16.5 Tons
    15 000Kg = 15 tons by definition. If you're talking metrics, talk metrics all the way...
    --

    One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
    1. Re:Math (was Re:Logistics) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the US mail does its math in english units.

    2. Re:Math (was Re:Logistics) by theperplepigg · · Score: 1
      15 000Kg = 15 tons by definition. If you're talking metrics, talk metrics all the way...

      i always thought a ton was 2000 lbs. does that mean a kilogram is exactly 2 lbs? --paul

      --
      -- Every time you kill a kitten, God masturbates.
    3. Re:Math (was Re:Logistics) by Snafoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, 15,000kg = 15 Tonnes = ~16.5Tons.

      If you're going to bitch about metricity, the least you can do is not to confuse the two systems.

      --
      - undoware.ca
    4. Re:Math (was Re:Logistics) by neur0maniak · · Score: 1

      Actually, a metric "ton" is properly labelled a "tonne" meaning 1,000Kg.

      The Imperial equivalent is either 2,000lbs in the U.S. or 2,240lbs in Britain.

      1,000Kg is about 2,205lbs.
      1Tonne is about 0.98 (british) Tons.

      But yeah, I agree with keeping metric if starting metric.

    5. Re:Math (was Re:Logistics) by Saib0t · · Score: 3, Informative
      i always thought a ton was 2000 lbs. does that mean a kilogram is exactly 2 lbs?
      And right you are, but we're not talking about the same ton. There are (at least) 3 tons. The metric, the US and the english one.

      The metric ton (also called tonne) is 1000 Kg (2204.623 pounds)
      The english ton (also refered to as the long ton) is 2240 pounds (1016.047 Kg)
      The US ton (also refered to as the short ton) is 2000 pounds (907.185 Kg)

      So no, the ton that is 2000 lb is not equal to 1000Kg, you thus can't say that 1Kg = 2lbs.

      --

      One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
    6. Re:Math (was Re:Logistics) by Saib0t · · Score: 3, Informative
      No, 15,000kg = 15 Tonnes = ~16.5Tons.
      If you're going to bitch about metricity, the least you can do is not to confuse the two systems.
      The metric ton is also refered to as tonne, you're right, but it is also a ton. The ton you are refering to is called the british ton or the long ton and is equal to 1016.047 Kg as opposed to the US ton or short ton which is 907.185 Kg. the metric ton (still called ton or tonne) is 1000Kg. the three are right.
      --

      One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
  148. AOL Could have saved some money by Cassanova · · Score: 1

    They should have just distributed a few fixed number CDs under GPL - the redistribution channels would taken over from there onwards and the cds would have spread not just all over the USA but even to the rest of the world..

  149. Re:Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my opinion, AOL's product sucks, and those millions of people are dumber because of it.

    Why should you give a fuck if they are dumber? The dumber they are, the smarter it makes you look. If people want to be dumb, it is their perogative.

  150. Put those account to use. by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

    seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours.

    Make a script that create an AOL account with each registration number on the cds. Then have every account generate and forward mail to every other account. Especially emails with large attachments. I sure AOL's systems will feel that.

  151. CNN by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anybody besides me find it odd that this story is being carrried by CNN? Who's going to be there to cover the story when the CDs are delivered? CNN?

    Something smells fishy about this...

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  152. AOL reminds me... by krinsh · · Score: 1

    of a girlfriend you once really cared for but now is a very annoying somebody. I get a 'come back to AOL' disc about once a quarter - and I used them for only a couple months in 1993, before I went back to real BBSes - and MUDs, and the beginnings of public Internet, etc. Rather than collect one million and send the truckload to them; one would think a greater form of civil disobedience would be to encourage everyone to not spend their own money - just write 'Return to Sender' on the kit and send it back. That actually costs them; since they have to pay postage both ways. I think if you get another after that you have a right to complain about unsolicted mail.

    --
    I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  153. High power CD burner???? by Nonillion · · Score: 0

    Maybe manufactures could come out with a high power cd burner to just simply over write the existing data. That way I could actually reuse the free disks they keep sending me, since they quit sending me floppys =(

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  154. Sounds like a nice idea... by DarkCobra555 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's give AOL 1000 free hours of finding out what to do with their own mailed-back discs...

  155. AOL Login/Password sever website? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

    Some folks have said (jokingly) it's all about getting 1Billion hours of free Internet. You don't really need the physical media, or at least only one copy not 1,000,000. What if everyone who got an AOL CD and was never going to use it, took their login for 1,000 hours free and posted to some website. Then folks could go there and download a new one an have continual free AOL.

    1. Re:AOL Login/Password sever website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can forgive you for not knowing that AOL requires a new credit card number (or, alternatively, a checking account number) to use those "free" hours. I had subscribed to AOL (POPs all over the country--great for conferences when you're in a hotel room with free local calls) and cancelled. Over a year later, I tried again, and had to use a different credit card number to activate the new coaster. This of course implies that they retain the previously used credit card number. Next time, I'll be using a one-time Private Payments number from American Express.

      ~~~

  156. Re:Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

    A few reasons:

    1) I am a computer tech by trade, and I have to clean up after AOL when their crappy software has munged a PC.
    2) It takes a everything short of a lawsuit to make them stop billing you.
    3) AOL does not introduce people to the Internet, it dumbs down the Internet, thereby hurting the users in the process. 90% of the AOL users I've had to deal with think their Web Browser is the "Internet". And after years of thinking this, it is almost impossible to get them to understand the truth.
    4) AOL harbors undesirable individuals much like certain middle eastern nations harbor militant terrorists. What's worse, with all the free 1000 hour disks floating about, individuals who mean ill to the 'Net at large can easily gain free access over and over to do more damage.
    5) The service is crap. But since most AOL users have been coddled for so long, they CAN'T learn to use anything else; they are stuck w/ sub par service...
    6) If I think of some more reasons (I know there's a few more)... I'll post another response... :P

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  157. Awesome! by greymond · · Score: 1

    The idea is hilarious, I just wish the article listed there website or an address where I could send them my cd's.

    In fact their idea gives me the idea of mailing out my creative endevours to all the junk mail offices that send me stuff.

  158. They won't make it through the gates. by nsushkin · · Score: 1

    I looked through those guy's FAQ and I didn't see an explanation how the trucks are supposed to get pass the gates (presuming AOL HQ is fenced)

    Also, isn't dumping tons of CDs on the street illegal?

  159. Re:Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL? by zemkai · · Score: 1
    overall I think the internet as a community would be better off if AOL was simply an ISP rather than a content/software/advertising provider

    As someone who was there when AOL started connecting to Usenet, allow me to say.

    No.

    More AOL content = less reason for AOL users to stray out onto the 'net at large...

    -ZK-

  160. that may backfire. by budalite · · Score: 2

    I imagine they make their money from advertising, not access. This idea could backfire. With my luck, using 1000 hrs w/o paying WOULD make them money. /.'ing their mail might not work. What do you do with the advertising you get in your mail? :{)||

  161. Please save them by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    What if when the smoke clears from the annihilation of life as we know it: the half cockroach/half human forms that rise from the ashes decide to use these AOL CD's as the basis for their new form of currency? That is why I am hoarding my precious few -- and will be laughing at you all on my way to the post apocolypic exchange center of the future.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  162. why not... by roybentley · · Score: 1

    just write "package refused: return to sender" on every aol cd you get and send it back to them? it's easier, and doesn't cost you any money.

  163. Return to Sender by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

    It would cost less if you hand out "return to sender" lables. Put their address on it so that will be the only purpose they are used for, which will also help in case they don't have a return address on the package.

    Physically bringing it to their doorstep is just asking for trouble anyway.

    --
    TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    1. Re:Return to Sender by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      read the faq on the site. you can't return that class of bulk mail to the sender.

    2. Re:Return to Sender by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      Well that stinks. What if it was drugs? Or a dead body? I don't want to have the responsibility to dispose of someone else's trash.

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
  164. I LIKE aol cds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They make great scarecrows. Tie them to strings and hang them from poles in your garden, the shiny reflectivity scares the birds off.

    Too bad they don't scare squirrels, too.

    Also too bad they stopped sending floppies, they were even more useful than the CDs!

  165. Homeowner Retalliation by ReadParse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I keep considering getting the people who live in our subdivision to do the same thing. All these clowns who think it's effective marketing (it ain't) to put a flier and some little rocks (for weight) in a baggy and throw it in my lawn, just ANYWHERE in my lawn, have another thing coming.

    I think it would be really cool to have everybody in my subdivision (96 houses) to contribute these offerings, and we can make weekend trips to the "advertisers" and throw them onto their property.

    RP

  166. How to get rid of junk mail (Yes, it's free) by Doug+Dante · · Score: 1
    Go to the DMA Mail Preferences Page

    Fill out the form.

    Press "Register by mail".

    Get a stamp and envelope, and mail it to this address (Also on the form).

    MAIL PREFERENCE SERVICE
    ATTN: DEPT: 6538045
    DIRECT MARKETING ASSOCIATION
    P.O. BOX 282
    CARMEL NY 10512

    Repeat in 5 years.

    Works well for me.

    --
    The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
  167. Keep sending discs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It helps stave off Microsoft's takeover of the ISP market.

  168. My contribution by bsDaemon · · Score: 2

    I took 217 of these CDs from a local CompUSA one night to get them out of circulation for one, and also incase i ever know 217 people that would want to come to my house and set cups down. Assuming that my parents havn't thrown them out since the last time I have been home from school, I'm sending them in.

  169. their homepage by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

    www.nomoreaolcds.com ...surprized that no other karma-whore did that yet. -D

  170. Not A Good Idea by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

    If these guys succeed, what's stopping AOL from re-packaging each CD and mailing it out again?

    1. Re:Not A Good Idea by MURL · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article?

      'McKenna and Lieberman scratch the CDs so they can't be sent out again and then they loop them on string'

      --
      --- Have you seen MURL?
    2. Re:Not A Good Idea by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

      Did you notice my sarcasm? :)

    3. Re:Not A Good Idea by forkboy · · Score: 2

      Sarcasm doesn't translate to text very well. Besides, I think you just didn't read the article and are ashamed that you got busted. ;)

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    4. Re:Not A Good Idea by bagsc · · Score: 1

      You have to hide the fact that you didn't read the article: find all the modded down peeps on the thread and read their mistakes. Its usually more informative and entertaining than the article.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    5. Re:Not A Good Idea by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

      Damn, you caught me. I can type "good" but can't read. Oh well... guess I have to go back to Hooked on Phonics.

  171. Here's the question by BreakWindows · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1,000,000 CD's is such an abundance that it will really piss off the multinational corporation...but this jackass has a nice, convenient place to store them in the meantime? Does he realize he has to have the million CD's sitting around annoying him, before giving them back to the company who is going to send them back out to us?

    Jackass..

    1. Re:Here's the question by nachoboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the faq.

      2. Where are you going to store all those CDs?

      One million CDs is about 17 tons (we've done our homework). They will be stored in our High-Tech Secure Storage Facility: MyBackYard(tm)

  172. a much more interesting use by bcboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seen at the Seventh Sense Fashion Show in Santa Cruz last year:

    http://www.sosaywe.com/cdgirls.htm

  173. how to block mail you don't want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    not quite true...there's a PO form you can fill out that interdicts specific companies/ppl from sending you mail.

    the original purpose was to stop pr0n junkmail to people who don't want it, but the PO itself has verified that this is the correct form to use to reject junkmail. the best part is that once notified, the offender has to pay a bigass fee ($500?) every subsequent time they violate it.

    the form num is: 1500 "Application for Listing and/or Prohibitory Order"

    http://www.usps.com/forms/_pdf/ps1500.pdf

    1. Re:how to block mail you don't want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you sure about that one? I downloaded the form and it seems to be pretty specific as to the mail it's blocking, wants a piece of offending mail, and requires the names of your children (of which I have none). *shrug* maybe I'm just not seeing a loophole.

    2. Re:how to block mail you don't want... by dsl · · Score: 0

      The wording on the form looks pretty specific, but the loophole is that YOU decide what mail is offensive to YOU.

      I've used it to stop getting AOL CDs, and to stop getting loan offers from CitiFinancial after they wouldn't take a phoned-in "Stop sending this shit to my wife, as I don't have one, and if I wouldn't marry anyone stupid enough to take a loan at 18.99% interest" for an answer. Got moderately confused looks from the postal clerk, but they processed both forms without complaint, and both problems have stopped completely for six months and counting.

      --
      I refuse, on principle, to have a .sig.
  174. AOL Disc Parties by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

    But AOL -- with 35 million subscribers worldwide -- uses the tactic most frequently. The AOL discs appear in magazines, at the movies, in the mail and at parties, but an AOL spokesman wouldn't say how many discs are sent out every year.

    Cool. I can start having AOL disc parties (kinda like Tupperware, 'cept different). I can showcase the different AOL CDs now flouting through the USPS. And tell people how they too can receive 4 discs in one day.

    We can have games, like name your favorite AOL customer service rep and pin the tail on Steve Case. And door prizes, we have to have door prizes... maybe AOL CDs from around the world.

    And cake, punch, and cookies... emmmm cookies.

  175. natural apartment lighting by Urox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've had no previous problem with using the cds as coasters (condensation only happened on the outside of the ring for me). However, that is not my main usage.

    I have, in fact, walked off with hundreds of them carefully swiped into a bag from various movie theatres, pharmacies, and book stores (the place where I usually see them in massive cartons full).

    Then I proceed to clear-tape them all together and reflect light into my apartment. My apartment gets light only from a single window and sliding glass door on one short side of the rectangle of the apartment. Since it faces south-east, it works rather well to reflect lots of light in.

    I'd actually like to do up the whole patio outside the sliding glass door (I've got about a third of it done) but that would involve swiping more handfuls of cds.

    --
    "Would you rather have a playstation addicted dork wearing a star wars t-shirt?"
  176. Let's have an AOL party! by kebr · · Score: 2, Funny

    "But AOL -- with 35 million subscribers worldwide -- uses the tactic most frequently. The AOL discs appear in magazines, at the movies, in the mail and at parties..."

    At *PARTIES* ?? Maybe all AOL/Time/Warner employess have to go to company-sponsored parties and get maketed to, like a tupperware party.

  177. seems like a better taste... by Dead_Smiley · · Score: 1
    seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours. A million people do *that* and I bet they'd stop filling our mailboxes with the landfill of tomorrow."

    I don't think I want to give them my credit card number just so I tie up my home phone line for 1000 hours.

    Nope, no thanks.

    --
    I know what the Internet is, what the hell is this Interweb business?!
  178. I'll take them by TomatoMan · · Score: 2

    I've been saving them for years. Someday I'm going to build a solar collector. Honest.

    --
    -- http://frobnosticate.com
  179. Another suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Why can't they take the CDs, try to put them in a skeet shooter, then launch them and use them as clay pigeons? You get target practice AND you get to take your anger out on an AOL product. Talk about killing two birds with one stone. :)

  180. Re:Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL? by rppp01 · · Score: 2

    I am not sure that bringing a pc or the internet to the desktop of every person out there is a good idea. We talk about how it is great to share information and get everyone into the 21st century with email and web sites and online banking and blah blah blah. But really, I know many people who use a computer, and the internet, and I am not so sure they wouldn't be better off without it. They are not only clumsy and clueless, but they don't seem to want to know how to use the computer. It is almost as if just having one is a status symbol. But attach a file in email? Uh huh, riiiiight. Plus, the market of users has caused a flood of poor software out there. This doesn't help matters at all. But it leads me to the age old question: do you dumb down the computer, or educate the user?

    Look at the automobile industry. While I admit that most have no clue how to work on one, they usually are reliable enough, and user friendly enough to get people where they need to go. But in order to use a car, they need to pass a test, and get certified. I don't suggest certifying computer users, but I think they should take some responsibility in learning about the computer that is so proudly sitting on that desk in the office or living room.

    AOL and Microsoft are the 'bad guys' for 2 reasons: size- which leads to the 2nd: they think they can get away with shodding software and shodding business practices. And as long as they do these things, and we have users who don't give a crap, they will be on my list of 'shitty software to not recommend to the user'. Especially AOL.

    my 2 cents.....out

    --
    They stuck me in an institution, said it was the only solution, to...protect me from the enemy, myself
  181. Huh, I never thought of that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'd hate to be the guy opening those envelopes thinking it's business time, and finding nothing but their shredded mailer. I think I'll do that from now on!

  182. It's mandatory, sorry... by Espectr0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... but:

    Can they make a beowulf cluster out of those million cd's? :)

    And also:
    1.-Send a million cd's to people that don't want them.
    2.-Very few people will use the service, but it will pay for costs plus a little income.
    3.-Profit!

    1. Re:It's mandatory, sorry... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

      I wish I moderator access I mod you back down to submission.

      Anyways you forgot a step before profit?

      3. ???
      4. Profit!

  183. Re:Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL? by jez9999 · · Score: 0

    I tried to un-install AOL from my dad's computer once, did it without asking him. :-) He went psycho, giving me stuff like 'I need my AOL!!!', 'Where's my AOL???'

    See, if people learnt to use REGULAR ISPs, they wouldn't become so dependent on one piece of software. Now he's been assimilated with it for life, like a Borg drone.

  184. don't sign up for free hours by jvj24601 · · Score: 1
    seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours. A million people do *that* and I bet they'd stop filling our mailboxes with the landfill of tomorrow.
    Are you kidding? A million people do that, and quarterly earning go through the roof. I can't count the number of family/friends who tried AOL for awhile but couldn't get the bastards to actually stop billing.
  185. AOL meets Martha Stewart... by TParkerDotNet · · Score: 2, Funny

    They make great wallpaper... when you put the silkscreen side down. I am wallpapering my studio with them. I still need plenty more, so send me some while you're at it: T. Parker P.O. Box 495 Gulfport, MS 39501-0495 :-)

  186. "CD's are plastic"... gets Informative; Score=4??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. Stupid Slashdot kids.

  187. There's nothing like a good ISP... by dark&stormynight · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and AOL is NOTHING LIKE a good ISP!

  188. I can't remember by crivens · · Score: 1

    I can't remember the last time that I received an AOL CD in the post. Mind, I only receive bills and adverts for local Pizza and Chinese restaurants anyway!

  189. Bizarre packaging by fanatic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I got my latest AOL coaster (CD) yesterday. It acually came in a metal container. Think of the tins that mints (such as penguin mints or Altoids) come in, but CD sized. I'm not an AOL user. Never have been. Why would they use such a wasteful container? It had to cost 3 times what the CD did - probably more.

    --
    "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
    1. Re:Bizarre packaging by Frobnicator · · Score: 2

      They've been out in the tins for a few months now. I just got my third one a few days ago. My two-year-old loves them.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    2. Re:Bizarre packaging by inKubus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because you can put your weed in it.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    3. Re:Bizarre packaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAH!!!

      that is EXACTLY what i did when i got one a few weeks ago.. lol!!

    4. Re:Bizarre packaging by Rinikusu · · Score: 2

      Man, that fucking tin container is COOL. :) I brillo-pad them down to just shiny aluminum and find alternative uses for them. I dunno what to do with the CD, though..

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  190. YEAH@ Free dvd case! by mekkab · · Score: 2

    Frequently the little spindle holder in the middle breaks-

    My wife ordered an exercise DVD (which is the killer app for DVD, nevermind crappy behind the scenes footage no one cares about! A la carte exercise selection, instantly fast forward past parts you don't want to do, its great!) and it came with the spindle holder broken.

    So- a quick change and now the old AOL dvd box does a great job of protecting DVD's I care about.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  191. You are all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are all LOSERS whining about a company that has been on the forefront of many battles you believe in. Grow up and Find a new battle.

  192. Send it Business Reply Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a hold of an AOL Business Reply Mail envelope or postcard. Make photocopies of it. Put 10 lbs of AOL CDs in a box. Tape one of the photocopies to the box. Dump it at your local post office. Rinse and repeat.

  193. Don't fall for AOL's free offering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours".

    I heard they get your credit card number and you will have a hard time trying to cancel. By the time you get it done, you had to pay a couple of months. It's a trap.

  194. Only one problem: by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

    When AOL realizes that ~ 50% of the cds returned are at least a year or two old they're going to think people actually keep the shit even if they don't plan to use it. Believe me, they'd much rather us throw it in a drawr than in the trash.

    OTOH, they may dump even more money into shipping cds and go bankrupt. In which case micros~1 will take over the internet and pretend they co-invented it with Al Gore.

    --
    Common sense is not so common.
  195. Pottery Barn by lostchicken · · Score: 3, Funny

    Reminds me of the time on Seinfeld that Kramer dumped a pile of Pottery Barn catalogs in front of the door to the store so that no one could get in.
    (I couldn't think of a Simpsons reference for /., so this had to do.)

    --
    -twb
  196. 101 uses for a dead cd by Observer · · Score: 2

    Google located a few droll suggestions for this.

    But, does anyone have any *serious* suggestions for economically viable ways to reuse the materials in provided-for-free CDs? They're not yet so ubiquitous as waste-paper or retail shopping bags, but in the places where they are widely distributed, the obvious uses of propping up short furniture legs, mounting on strings to scare birds away from ripe fruit, and amusing children with microwave-oven indoor firework displays must all have been reached long ago.

    1. Re:101 uses for a dead cd by sarah_the_librarian · · Score: 1

      Some of my favorite uses for junk CDs: 1. Prom Decorations (glue 2 together and you've got glitz and glamour galore) 2. Eye-catching decorations for a high school library (or an alternative to Ritalan for those select few..) 3. Signal mirrors for wilderness survival kits, lightweight and indestructible, also doubles as a camping pot lid when you wedge a stick in the middle. 4. To Do lists or Grocery lists (don't tell me I'm the only one who thinks its almost orgasmic to use a Sharpie on such a smooth, shiny surface) 5. Sturdy dividers for note cards or index cards 6. Pooper scoopers (hint: using a pair of pliers or tongs to hold the CD makes the experience more pleasant)

  197. Re:Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
    Why people hate AOL:
    • They force you to use their dialer, meaning you can't do simple dial-up networking sharing, auto-dialing. Other ISPs use these but still allow you to set up an (unsupported) PPP connection using standard tools
    • Said dialer software is full of adverts. AOL/Time Warner removed popup handling abilities from Netscape for this reason, I believe.
    • At one point, you had to use their own browser
    • It forces you to have Real Player installed (evil) and complains every time you dial in if you remove it
    • They ask for your credit card during the trail for verification etc then automatically start billing you without warning. Cancelling used to be difficult and often went "wrong".
    • You are paying over the odds because the service has great customer help, which is useless to techies. (I'd recommend it to non-techies for this reason tho)
    • They send junk mail. Lot's of it. Regularly. To the same people.
    • Said junk mail is not just recyclable paper, it's a cd-rom and a complete waste of resources and bad for environment as it needs to be disposed of in landfills.
    • Typically, lamers and newbies were on AOL. A large majority of HTML posts to usenet are from AOL and other anti-social net activites are common, hence the term AOLamer

    Just a few thoughts from the top of my head... ;-)

  198. You Have Crap by jcasey · · Score: 1

    Personally, I prefer to send back the return envelope with a little surprise - a smidgen of dog crap, a dead bug, etc... As far as the AOL CD's go, I used to use the free trial until it ran out, then switch to their competitor's free trail, and then switch back to AOL again - I went for years without paying for service - and they did'nt seem to mind either.

    --
    X
  199. AOL Free Stuff by cpuenvy · · Score: 1

    Years ago, before CD-ROMS became cheap, AOL would send out floppies with their software. We would take the floppies, format them, and voila... Free floppies.

    Then they started the CD's. Those instantly became high-risk frisbees or beer coasters in college.

    Now, these jerks are going to push their own agenda, which in turn is going to stop me from getting those neat little tins and all the other goodies AOL sends out at their users expense.

    Is nothing sacred?

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  200. The site by TheRedHorse · · Score: 1

    For those that didn't read the article, the 2 guys site is here

  201. Why? by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

    Why would you want AOL to stop sending free cds? Free cd cases! Especially the dvd style ones, they are nice :)

  202. Why direct our anger at AOL ... by kbielefe · · Score: 2, Funny

    when we know we all hate email spam even more? Where can I send my spam printouts for delivery?

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  203. I don't get anything in my mail... by bcc123 · · Score: 0
    I hear everybody bitching about getting too much junk mail, and I don't get any.

    I must be one of those bums that nobody want's to deal with :)

    Can't even get onto the "general consumer" list.

    Oh I'm so sad.

  204. noononono i want the aol cds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get the aol editions in the mail that come in DVD cases to store my games that come in cheap paper sleeves *cough* UT2K3 *coughs*

  205. DOS - the old fashioned way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everyone here at Slashdot should call up AOL, and request a free disc... everyday :)

  206. to /. or not to /. a site.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    Make up your mind, people. :P

    Either post a link in the article, thus dooming a poor web server somewhere, or do NOT post the link, leaving us to dig for it, but having a better chance of it actually being UP.

    I think they might have left the link off because of the fact that so many web servers have dropped off the net because of the /. effect. :P

  207. Re:Regular mail costs? Who cares? by operagost · · Score: 1

    So you pay all your bills electronically?

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  208. a waste by pyrrho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if you have THAT many of these things obviously you should bundle them in stacks of 100 and let your kids use them as fort making bricks!

    people that want to get back at AOL for snail spam (besides possibly wanting to go back to the hobby buffet for something a little more productive) should just put "return to sender", although IANAP (I am not a postman), I think that AOL would have to pay for that and it's a much more costly thing than the 100$ it will cost AOL to have a million CDs hauled from their lawn to the dump.

    --

    -pyrrho

  209. Thanks AOL for keeping postage cheap by salesgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    I love AOL for keeping the price of first class snail mail low... Thank you for picking up the slack for all of us that quit sending letters by snail mail. Now all I have to worry about is the USPS spending 2 Billion on changing their logo from a "stylized eagle" to a "stylized eagle"...

    Oh, yeah, if you give the CD's back, if AOL has any creativity, they'll just mail them out again and cut production costs!

    $G

    --
    -- $G
  210. Million people? by Osiris+Ani · · Score: 1
    seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours. A million people do *that* and I bet they'd stop filling our mailboxes with the landfill of tomorrow.
    Honestly, you don't really think a million AOL CDs equals a million people, do you? With the bulk of AOL CDs that get delivered through various methods (I think they come disguised as the toy surprise inside boxes of Cracker Jacks these days, too), 50,000 people starting from scratch could probably pull this off over the course of a couple of months without even coming close to breaking a sweat.
  211. I think there's a more charitable place to send to by io333 · · Score: 2

    This poor guy has been collecting disks since 1996. I think it's a more worthy cause!

  212. AOL CD's by mpost4 · · Score: 1

    I think I keep my aol cds, I have a nice set of coasters thanks to them (5 aol 2 ms 5 bad burned cds and 15 dell/hp "free" sorftware, from no name software companys)

  213. What The Hell!? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    I thought they were paper! You saved my chemistry grade! Thanks (karma whore).

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  214. Antisemitic and offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey fuckwad, my great-grandparents died at Belsen so why don't you stop offending the memory of millions of murdered people and pay attention to your fucking routers.

    Moron.

  215. This can take a little while by dacarr · · Score: 2
    These guys have been doing this for at least a year that I know of - I saw the data on this mailing list a while back. (Boy, Randy's gonna love me now.)

    When I first heard, they were well above 10000, but at the rate things are going it could take a few years - and with the trouble that America Online is reportedly in, they regretfully may not get the opportunity to bring in the sheaves, as it were.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  216. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I submitted this story about 3 months ago before CNN got ahold of it! :-P

  217. FUCK YOU, ERIK KROUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to hell, spammer Erik Krout.

  218. Either "funny" or just wrong by dfeist · · Score: 1

    The mod for the parent is wrong. you don't save anything by sending crap. at the very last, somebody has to pay it. so, "interesting" doesn't seem a good mod for the parent.

    --
    Unix makes easy tasks hard and hard tasks possible. Windows makes easy tasks easy and hard tasks $29.95.
  219. Hook 'em while they're young? by xlsior · · Score: 1

    A day after our first baby was born, we received a baby-package from the hospital -- Aside from the obligatory baby wipes, diaper samples, bottles, etc, the package also contained an AOL CD. Riiiiiight.

  220. Eat Bits, Jack Valenti by gelfling · · Score: 2

    I've always told people to simply email all their mp3's back to the RIAA since they believe we shouldn't own them.

  221. If AOL were smart (but they're not)... by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 3

    If AOL really wanted to have people waiting in eager anticipation of the mailman's arrival then they'd use CDRW media instead of stamped disks.

    This way, we'd all be getting something for our efforts -- even if we didn't want to join AOL.

    That's why I used to like it when they sent floppy disks instead of CDs.

  222. Doesn't work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My P.O. Box still gets junk mail addressed to chrrent resident... :-(

  223. fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wonder if these two guys left their addresses. they could very well end up getting them back from AOL.

  224. Free Roofing Shingles! by TheBillGates · · Score: 1

    If you cut those in half (made two semi-circles) you could use them instead of shingles for your house.

    Plus, it sure would keep the sun from heating up your house in the summer.

  225. clog their phonelines by sahmed · · Score: 1

    Perhaps a better way to sabotage AOL and send them a message is have a "dial-in hour" where everyone sets their computers to dial in and try to get an acct. It has a few effects. They pay for the 800 phone call, and it clogs up their phone lines.

    There must be some good humanitarian use for the disks. Like glueing them into flooring or something.

  226. Send CDs to Junk Mailers by TheBillGates · · Score: 1

    Put the AOL CDs in the business reply envelopes the junk mailers send you.

  227. This is a good idea. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2

    Instead of sending it to these two guys, why don't we just mail them to the homes of AOL executives by the thousands?

  228. Why Bother by tucay · · Score: 1

    AOL will just mail them out again.

  229. Here's a picture of their pile... by skookum · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a picture of their current heap from a couple of months ago, approximately 60,000 or so. As you would know if you read the article, they scratch them and then place them on strings for storage.

    Also, they've done their own calculations on exactly how much space and weight these will take up (even how many trucks they'll need when they cart them cross country to AOL HQ.)

    And finally, moderators, please do your duty and mod down all the retards (who obviously didn't read the article) who keep posting "Won't they just send the CDs back out?"

  230. Glitter, Indigo and Chilli Powder by grahamsz · · Score: 2

    Are just some of the great substances that you can add to their reply envelopes.

    Make sure that you put the required form back in the envelope along with one of the above mentioned substances - so they can whip the form out of the envelope for maximum effect.

    Glitter generally just sticks to everything (not just 4 yr olds) and also should screw up automated letter openers.

    Inidigo is a nice strong blue powder dye, perfectly harmless but again makes a mess.

    And well chilli powder should keep the office smelling like a taco hell.

  231. Would you like an AOL cd with that? by Stregone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has anyone else gotten an AOL cd with their peanuts on an airplane? I swear that is a moment I will never forget. I had to try really hard not to crack up laughing. I looked around and no one else seemed to see the humor in it...

  232. Kill two birds with one stone: by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

    Mail the discs back to AOL, ship them postage due and C.O.D., then either AOL will have to pay the post office again, OR the post office will refuse to ever take their CDs in mass mailing shipments...

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  233. In Canada.... by rocca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We're lucky that we don't get AOL marketing like this due to CD-use being illegal up North (I think it's because the silver coating freezes in the computers causing poisonous vapours?) but we occasionally still get the AOL floppies but not very often as it probably costs a lot of postage to deliver the 82 disks by sled to all 40,000 habitants, eh?

  234. Actually, that's a good point... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    What if, instead of returning them (or at least instead of scratching them), they got the ID or whatever off the disks, dump them into a database and establish a "free ISP" pool?

  235. Two words: by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "How about Monday October 28th at 8PM"

    Time zones.

    1. Re:Two words: by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1

      Local time - the idea is to tie up their modems, which are unlikely to be centralized.

      --
      ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
  236. Long-term project by PizzaFace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the project's inception on 8/1/01 to the last update on 10/15/02, they collected 64,346 CDs. At that rate of 4,438 CDs per month, they'll finish collecting 1,000,000 sometime in May of 2020.

    I'll check back around then for the Slashback.

  237. Coasters . . . by HawaiiPiglet · · Score: 1

    . . . that's right, CDs make great and colorful coasters so take them to your favorite bar but be sure to a double handful at home for your next wedding reception.

    --
    Those who would surrender freedom for security soon have neither.
  238. Money in thier mailbox by bxbaser · · Score: 1

    When I was in the cd industry we sold our printed metalized rejects for .10 cents each.
    Im sure the prices are way lower now, but not much work goes into calling the reclaim guy and having him pick up a ton or 2 of cd's.
    Easy money for them.

  239. PO Box and spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is only one way for him to stop putting such mail ... such as the coupon newspapers and pizza offers - get a P.O. Box.
    Nah, my PO Box gets it too. I asked the postmaster if they could not do that, and he said "if they pay to put it in your box, it goes in your box". Luckily, my PO branch has a large garbage can in the lobby. Wonder if they recycle?

  240. CompuServe cd's in NL.... by MonoSynth · · Score: 1, Informative

    I remember from a couple of years ago the flood of CompuServe cd's here in the Netherlands. With every computer-related magazine there was one, and with a subscription you had twelve after a year.

    Unfortunately (for them), they had a freepost mailbox, so there came initiatives to send the cd's in nice larger-than-envelope boxes by *registered* mail tot their freepost mailbox, one cd at a time. That way it costed them 8.50 guilders (4 euro/$) per sent-back cd. Since then I've never seen a CompuServe (or other spam) cd with a magazine :)

    Doesn't America have something like registered mail or freepost mailboxes?

  241. Mmmm, tinny by bagsc · · Score: 1

    I love these metal tins - I've gone on expeditions acquiring them from people and put all my cds in them. They are, as AOL indoubitably discovered, great at preventing cd damage. I was sick of having jewel cases in my bookbag getting cracked after an hour. The only trick, so far, has been that they open up after a couple dents, so use a rubber band with them. I hope AOL continues to squander their money making my life better through tins, CNN fighting Fox News, and widespread AIM (since they can't do so through content or service).

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  242. Re:Presorting by arangir · · Score: 1

    Well, I assure you that the USPS is not the only postal service in the world that have special conditions for presorted mail. My brother worked at CityMail (page in Swedish), who only do presorted mail.

    Admittedly, using them for your mailing won't help you reach US voters...

  243. Re:Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
    "Why do people hate AOL? Does anyone have a LEGITIMATE REASON for hating them? And I mean something more important than "I don't like getting those disks in the mail". There are lots of evil entities out there in the tech world. Does AOL really deserve to be place side by side with Microsoft et. al in the Technology Hall of Shame? AOL has been responsible for helping millions of people discover the internet."

    -They encourage parents to give up responsibility for their children's safety into the hands of parental controls in software.

    -They encourage parents to give up responsibility for helping their children with their education since "homework help is just a breeze on AOL"

    -Their business model depends on people no realising that they are out of free hours and are going to be charged unless they perform some frustrating and time-hungry tasks to cancel the service. Essentially, they depend on the users thinking they know the whole story when really, they don't until they are forced to pay more.

    -They give a misconception of 'the internet' to new users. Some people think that surfing aol:// addresses means they are on the internet.

    -They are an ecological menace. Most of the CDs they send out are trashed. Also, consider the waste put out to make the components of the CDs and electricity expended to make something which just fills our landfills faster.

    -They reward ignorance. They make it acceptable for you to know nothing about computers and be happy with it even though you are using them as an integral part of your life. (Please no automobile analogies.)

    -The stifle choice. Supposedly part of the big news for AOL 8 is that you can now choose between 8 welcome screens and change the colours of your AOL interface ... oooooh ....

  244. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Destiny is a good thing to accept when it's going your way. When it isn't,
    don't call it destiny; call it injustice, treachery, or simple bad luck.
    -- Joseph Heller, "God Knows"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...