Slashdot Mirror


Affordable and Safe Data Protection Practices?

cfreeze asks: "With the recent fire at the University of Twente, I started to think 'Are the steps I'm taking to backup my home network sufficient?'. The first thing going through my mind was the need to mail a set of recent backup discs to a family member. I feel this is a good first step, but due to the distances involved it may prove to be impractical. The second was a small hidden personal safe that is fireproof. What steps are you taking?" If you are interested in truly protecting your data, you have to realize that making backups is just a start. Next comes protecting those backups from floods, fires, and other catastrophes that might occur. What do you do to protect your backups?

583 comments

  1. the safe may be fireproof by phliver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but can the storage format your putting your data on stand up to the heat?

    1. Re:the safe may be fireproof by ChazeFroy · · Score: 5, Informative

      The submitter of this story should take a look at the ISO 17799 standard (formerly the British Standard 7799) for data security.

      As for backups, best practices suggests that you keep one on site and one off site. The off site location should be at least 6.5 miles from the site. This distance was calculated throughout the years as insurance companies assessed damage caused by widespread natural disasters (hurricanes, floods) and the area that was impacted by them.

    2. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Yohahn · · Score: 2

      My understanding is that WORM drives will work in some of these cases as there is more of an Etching going on..

      I've heard that canceled checks can be archived on these.

    3. Re:the safe may be fireproof by photon317 · · Score: 3, Informative


      While 6.5 miles may meet some statistical standard for insurers, it's not really sufficient in the individual company's case when planning to survive large natural disasters or civil disorder (or whatever else you haven't though of).

      As an example from a large telco I worked for - data from Omaha, NE was offsited to Washington and vice-versa. Cross-country like that is your best bet.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    4. Re:the safe may be fireproof by n1ywb · · Score: 1
      At a company I used to work for we stored our DAT data backups inside firesafe boxes inside firesafe safes. There was about 6 inches of material between the DATs and the air outside the safe. Supposedly they would protect the tapes for up to an hour in a 3000 degree fire or something like that.


      Once a week we sent a backup home with the CEO.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    5. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Funny
      Cross-country like that is your best bet.

      I think companies in Monaco and the Vatican will prefer the 6.5 mile rule of thumb.
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    6. Re:the safe may be fireproof by pkiguruman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since most safes are designed to keep the temperature below that which will damage paper, I just uuencode all of my data and print it all up. Now I just need some more $$$ for a few more safes. (that paper really takes up a lot of space, maybe I should use BOTH sides of it.)

    7. Re:the safe may be fireproof by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      Quote the poster:
      data from Omaha, NE was offsited to Washington and vice-versa. Cross-country like that is your best bet.

      Quote the article:
      'Are the steps I'm taking to backup my home network sufficient?'

      Cross-country might be overkill... ;)

    8. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      While 6.5 miles may meet some statistical standard for insurers, it's not really sufficient in the individual company's case when planning to survive large natural disasters or civil disorder (or whatever else you haven't though of).

      As an example from a large telco I worked for - data from Omaha, NE was offsited to Washington and vice-versa. Cross-country like that is your best bet.


      Even better, if aliens come and destroy all the major cities, there's no way in hell they're going to bother with Omaha, NE.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    9. Re:the safe may be fireproof by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      I keep one copy of the important stuff, data, configs, apps and the like at work. The OS, I can always download when the insurance kicks in for the PCs and laptops.

    10. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that you can not see the standard without giving them cash. do you work for them?

    11. Re:the safe may be fireproof by buffy · · Score: 2
      can the storage format your putting your data on stand up to the heat?

      Rather than just looking for a standard Office Depot fireproof safe, you need to get a "media" rated fireproof safe. The same manufacturers make them, but you probably won't see it on shelves. I had to order them, and had them delivered.

      Lately, I've been using a safe-deposit box at my bank to store my home backups. That seems to be a decent solution.

    12. Re:the safe may be fireproof by photon317 · · Score: 2


      Actually, some of the reasoning behind the Omaha location is along those lines in a way. Omaha is a great location for a stable datacenter. Low population density, cheap land, no political uprisings to speak of, no nearby coasts, no major wartime targets, etc, etc.... All in all it's a great place to build a mammoth highly-redundant datacenter, it just sucks trying to find good people willing to work out there (or even travel out there from time to time like I had to).

      Our Omaha datacenter was very top notch by the way Designed to withstand tornado hits, heavy flooding, other random disasters. Security system (including external motion sensors and cameras) monitored locally and remotely in Dallas in realtime - one floor on ground level full of computer equipment on a 4 foot raised floor, and three underground floors housing the cooling, the generators, and the battery systems. Onsite deisel tanks to last days, 7 generators (5 needed, 2 for redundancy I believe), the bottom floor (batteries) designed with a 2 inch dip in the floor and a special rubber coating so that if all the battery acid leaked out it would be contained, etc... etc... Crazy over-engineering. The 4 foot raised floor is a geek's dream to work in. You can just hop down in there and work comformtably.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    13. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I'm in SoCal; my backups are in Nova Scotia. (And you think I'm kidding!) If there's a disaster here, how long will it take the dogsled to deliver my archives? :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    14. Re:the safe may be fireproof by stygar · · Score: 1

      Probably not much longer than it takes the cowboys on horseback that you send the backups up here with:)

    15. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Reziac · · Score: 2

      You mean they were supposed to RIDE? Oh dear! :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems the ISO17799 standard costs quite a bit to take a look at. Is it really worthwile to home users?

    17. Re:the safe may be fireproof by jweatherley · · Score: 2

      I suspect that the Vatican has got back up copies of the bible in off site locations. Monaco on the other hand may be in trouble...

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    18. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      no major wartime targets

      Wrong. Omaha has more telephone switching centers than any city in the nation and has been a national telephone center for decades Those phone services which make it a nice place for a data center also make it a target.

    19. Re:the safe may be fireproof by friscolr · · Score: 2
      Even better, if aliens come and destroy all the major cities, there's no way in hell they're going to bother with Omaha, NE.

      Omaha, NE is real close to where SAC operated back in the day. what's the name of the air force base there? i belive Bush flew there during 9/11.

      Had the Cold War gone hot, Omaha would have been well within the affected area of a number of nukes. Then again, Washignton would have been, too. Better to keep docs in Your Big City, and then in some Nowheresville.

      if you ever drive through NE, check out the SAC museum, off of I-80 in between Omaha and Lincoln (my photos of the musuem). it has a number of beautiful aircraft as well as a lot of historical information. Not nearly as large as the Dayton Museum (my photos), but still worth the stop.

    20. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Those phone services which make it a nice place for a data center also make it a target


      as if SAC weren't enough.

  2. Keep my backups at work by MeerCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I keep my home backups at work, and vice versa... works for me...

    --
    I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    1. Re:Keep my backups at work by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2

      But what if you get fired? (in this slow economy, that is much more probable than having sth physical happening to your backup media...)

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    2. Re:Keep my backups at work by MeerCat · · Score: 2

      Well I bring them home when I get handed the black bag (the real problem is that I keep about 50-100 books at work too) and I usually start a new job the next day... ;^)

      The advantage of them being at work is that I know I have quick access, the office is quite physically secure and has fire protection, and I'm regularly reminded how old the last "offsite backup" is... whereas "mail them to a family member" - maybe not...

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    3. Re:Keep my backups at work by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      Then you still have your copy at home. Then only case that this wouldn't work is if your home computer died the same day you got fired (which is possible if you took your anger out on your system, I guess). :)

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Keep my backups at work by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then you play the little exhange game. Your data for my data. You want your shady finacial records, I want my porn. Or is it the other way around?

    5. Re:Keep my backups at work by MeerCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was going to say that my karma is excellent so this wouldn't happen, but I see my original comment has been modded down already, so pardon me for a moment while I go hide my latest backups under the garden shed...

      I wish there was "no sig" checkbox on submission

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    6. Re:Keep my backups at work by Desco · · Score: 1

      Set up a small, secure server on your mom's computer. She'll never notice the ftp server running, and hopefully she'll never notice the missing 8 gig.

    7. Re:Keep my backups at work by MeerCat · · Score: 2


      Yeah, but she doesn't appreciate my taste in pr0n.

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    8. Re:Keep my backups at work by timeOday · · Score: 2

      Even if they didn't let you clean out your desk (which would surely constitute theft) it really woudn't matter, unless you got fired AND your home backups AND primary storage were destroyed all at the same time. Now that would be very unlucky indeed.

    9. Re:Keep my backups at work by fstanchina · · Score: 1

      Just get a fireproof safe which is large enough to hold your data and yourself.

  3. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I back them up of course.

  4. Data Back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Back up your data by posting it in slashdot comments. Sure it might have NOTHING to do with the story but who cares people poost goatcx.se links too.

    ALso FP

    1. Re:Data Back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't that the original intention of usenet? :-P

  5. Firesafe not good for data... by drywater · · Score: 1

    Although I do it anyway, most tapes and CDs will melt inside a firesafe in a fire.

    1. Re:Firesafe not good for data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


      I have a large safe, and I put several of the cheap small safes inside it with data and paper documents. The rating on safes is how long it takes the interior to reach paper combustion temps... (451f) That is 1.5 hours at 1600f for the large safe. The small safes are rated at 1h at 700 deg. If my house burns longer than the approx 2-3hrs it will take to heat up the little ones , then I have a problem.

    2. Re:Firesafe not good for data... by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Informative

      You, sir, are a dork.

      If your house burns down, it will burn all night and into the next day.

      And for what you spent on all those safes, you could easily rent an insured safety deposit box at your local bank.

      Of course, you know, that means going outside.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Firesafe not good for data... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > And for what you spent on all those safes, you could easily rent
      > an insured safety deposit box at your local bank.
      That's decent for frequent backups (because if it's too inconvenient to
      get them there you won't take them), but periodically you should send
      a backup to someplace more distant, by which I mean not in the same
      city.

      > Of course, you know, that means going outside.
      Aack, we hates the yellow face, don't we my precious? Yes, we hates
      it. It burns us, scorches our eyeses, doesn't it? Yes, my precious,
      we don't like it at all, no my precious, nasssty yellow face...

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    4. Re:Firesafe not good for data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You sir, are a bigger, more pompous dork. Safe deposit boxes at banks are NOT insured. The bank has no way to know what's in them, no way to value the contents, and thus has no obligation to replace them if the bank burns down.

      If you don't believe me, try the FDIC:
      http://www.fdic.gov/consumers/consumer/info rmation /fdiciorn.html

    5. Re:Firesafe not good for data... by Excarnate · · Score: 3, Informative

      You, sir, are an ass.

      If your house burns down, it will burn for a short time until the fire department puts the fire out. And even if it takes time for the entire house to burn, the portion with the safe will likely be Real Hot for a relatively short time (per this informative FAQ).

      And your safe might not even be near the fire.

      And although a safety deposit box is a good idea for level 0 or level 1 backups, what is the point of it being insured wrt data storage?

      Next time you call someone names, know what you are talking about. And a "fireproof" safe can be a good part of an entire data safety plan.

      What bothers me about all the people stating "get a fireproof safe" is that NO ONE has said if the normal kind actually work (or not) for protecting media from a fire. One person said he heard horror stories, but that's it. Ref. the previous FAQ link.

      And please, if you get a "fireproof" safe, consider bolting it to something strong (e.g. cement in basement) because having someone steal your computer and your backups sucks!

      --
      .signature: No such file or directory
    6. Re:Firesafe not good for data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, safety deposit box is an excellent solution, which we use at work. You can rent a very large box at a local bank that will store about 100 12/24 GB DLT tapes for less than $100 CDN a year. They do not charge me for access (once a month I drop off tapes/pick up ones back in rotation).

    7. Re:Firesafe not good for data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're both dweebs. Saying "you sir" before the insult isn't witty, it's just stupid.

    8. Re:Firesafe not good for data... by fataugie · · Score: 1
      Safe deposit boxes at banks are NOT insured.

      You sir are an Anonymous Coward ('nuf said). So, just how do I go about getting my home owner's insurance to cover 2 yr's accumulation of p0rn? How would I value it?

      --

      WTF? Over?

  6. Online Backup by ishamael69 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not do online backup? Many companies offer this fairly cheaply...

    For instance NovaStor

    1. Re:Online Backup by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      Why pay for it? Just back up to your Slashdot Journal! :-)

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:Online Backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Open5. All opensource.

    3. Re:Online Backup by br0ck · · Score: 1

      Be wary of smaller companies. I was using x-drive to store a few valuable files like pictures and financials and I didn't get the emails that said that if you don't pay then your files will be gone. I'm using the 30 Mb free at http://briefcase.yahoo.com/ for now, although I bet they'll start charging soon.

    4. Re:Online Backup by Dratman · · Score: 1

      Offsite backup is crucial in case of natural disaster. Think of the WTC disaster. And with broadband access, backup over the internet is the best way to achieve offsite backup.

      If you have an ISP account including storage space, or have any other access to an offsite server, arrange for automatic FTP or NFS backup of critical data to that server. The backup can be done with commercial software such as Retrospect, which has an FTP option and does its own timed backups, or with free software such as cpdup, run from a nightly cron job. I use both.

      --
      Sigmund
    5. Re:Online Backup by DancingSword · · Score: 1
      --
      Messages to/for me ( in me journal )
    6. Re:Online Backup by mikehunt · · Score: 1

      Yeah right, and how much time is it going to take me to send the 5GB of data I need to backup over my pathetic 128Kb/s cable modem upstream channel?

      Remote backup is fine if you have huge amounts of bandwidth. For the rest of us, forget it!

    7. Re:Online Backup by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      If memory serves me well, it was Linus who said:
      Backup? Why don't you put your stuff on-line and let the rest of the world mirror it?

    8. Re:Online Backup by Grab · · Score: 2

      Best answer - if you're doing work at home, make it a GPL project. You can then get yourself a SourceForge account, which (a) provides a convenient point to distribute your work to the world, and (b) provides an unbeatable off-site backup of the project.

      Of course, this isn't much use for other stuff like the book you're writing or whatever, but it's a good solution for software/electronics projects.

      Grab.

  7. Three words: by cje · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Safety deposit box.

    Your bank should make these available to you for next to nothing, and you don't have to worry about buying your own safe and making sure that it's secure, fireproof, etc.

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
    1. Re:Three words: by tjanofsky · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While it may be safer than your house, keep in mind that banks usually do not insure safety deposit boxes, and they are often not liable if the box is destroyed (e.g., at the WTC).

    2. Re:Three words: by davidmcn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sure, they may not be insured, but odds are next to none that both the backup that you keep at your house, the current running version of things on your lan and your bank are ALL going to go the way of the dodo on the same day. And if your really concerned about that then keep 2 deposit boxes at different branches of your bank.

      --
      Memories become legend, Legend fades to myth, and even myth is forgotten by the time that age comes again.-Robert Jordan
    3. Re:Three words: by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 5, Informative
      keep in mind that banks usually do not insure safety deposit boxes,

      The idea is to keep two sets of backups: one onsite (i.e. at home), and another one at a remote location (i.e. at the bank).

      Even if the contents is not insured (what's the monetary value of your personal data anyways?), the probability that something happens both to your home and to your bank is quite slim.

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    4. Re:Three words: by Skjellifetti · · Score: 5, Informative

      The one problem you might have is if you die and your SO needs to get at the backups for some reason. Many (most) states require that the box be sealed on the death of one of the owners until the probate stuff is straightened out. This is the reason why you should not keep your will in your safety deposit box. Let the attorney keep it for you.

      Of course, having said all that, I'll admit that I back up my data to CDR and put the CD in the safety deposit box at the bank. The one thing those backups contain that might cause a problem for my wife is the MS Money backup.

    5. Re:Three words: by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      The one thing those backups contain that might cause a problem for my wife is the MS Money backup

      But this will only be a problem if :

      - you died in the fire along with the original copy (i.e. if you just had a heart attack she could still easily get to the original).

      - the safe deposit backup was the only one you kept. For things like financial info, you could easily keep a copy at work of give a copy to another family member, or give a copy to your wife to stash somewhere (probably her purse ;)

    6. Re:Three words: by Bald+Wookie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, they may not be insured, but odds are next to none that both the backup that you keep at your house, the current running version of things on your lan and your bank are ALL going to go the way of the dodo on the same day.

      Earthquake
      Tornado
      Flood
      Riots
      Nuke Blast
      Bio/Chem Attack
      Asteroid
      EMP Attack
      Bad Backups

      OK, so it's still not likely. Even just making the list I felt like a card carrying member of the Tinfoil Hat Cabal. Living in LA, I could see at least of three of those wiping out my data. Add a fourth if Jack Bauer can't stop that nuke.

      If you care about your data enough that you'd miss it if your town turned into a smoking hole, store a copy a few hundred km away for safekeeping.

    7. Re:Three words: by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is the reason why you should not keep your will in your safety deposit box.

      There is usually a provision for 'Will discovery'. One family member, usually the proposed executor/administrator, is allowed to go into the box to look for and retrieve the will. Life insurance policies as well. Nothing else may be removed, though, until after probate.
      IANAL, but I just had to go through this procedure.

    8. Re:Three words: by dildatron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey, man, if all/some that shit happens, the last thing I am going to fscking care about is my backups. I think I will be glad if I am alive, and go from there...

      What good are my financial backups if my bank is now a pile of rubble? :) (joke)

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    9. Re:Three words: by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      In the even of one of those happening, what is the chance that your data will be missed or even that anyone will be around to care its gone?

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    10. Re:Three words: by Hilleh · · Score: 1

      The one problem you might have is if you die and your SO needs to get at the backups for some reason. Technically, that's really not your problem anymore. ;)

    11. Re:Three words: by hyperizer · · Score: 2

      Safety deposit box.

      Yeah, but that would be a big pain in the ass if your data changed with any frequency. Getting a safety deposit box opened can be a time-consuming process. I can't imagine doing it weekly (or more often) just to swap out a set of backup tapes or CDs.

    12. Re:Three words: by zenofjazz · · Score: 1
      Sure, they may not be insured, but odds are next to none that both the backup that you keep at your house, the current running version of things on your lan and your bank are ALL going to go the way of the dodo on the same day.

      Earthquake
      Tornado
      Flood
      Riots
      Nuke Blast
      Bio/Chem Attack
      Asteroid
      EMP Attack
      Bad Backups

      Uhm.. A couple of those, how likely are you to survive, to care whether your data did?

      as for the rest, I try to keep the "important" data on my home LAN burned to CD, and typically have a copy kicking around my desk at work (reference copies are a good thing) as well as at home.

      This is a good thing(tm) because my Linux box at home died a horrible death last week... As soon as a new hard disk arrives, I rebuild the OS, and restore all the "mission critical" data from cd-rom.

      --
      -- All That's Evil in the Geek Space ... Allthatsevil.wordpress.com
    13. Re:Three words: by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      Um, maybe your wife could just not tell the bank that you're dead until after she cleans out the box? Or were you under the impression that they would "just know?"

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    14. Re:Three words: by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

      I second this. I kick off a 40gb DLT Cartridge about every month. I have a 'fireproof safe', but the tape would just melt in there. We have recently gotten a safety deposit box and started dropping our tapes there.

      It can be a bit of a hastle to drive across town for a tape to restore that one 15kb Word Document, but you are nine 9s (99.9999999%) closer to being garounteed of your data's safety. To combat that travel time, we have a 325GB RAID 5 NAS server used for local online archival with plans to buy more as needed. I just wish Dell would hurry up and start putting the 320GB Maxtor in those suckers (:

      As for personal backups ... burn a CD occationally and take it to work - stick it in your desk drawer. For work, onsite NAS and offsite tape.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    15. Re:Three words: by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      BAH too difficult for anyone to practically keep up to date.

      Why is everyone ignoring the most logical of offsite storage?? your work. you have a desk or locker or torture chamber there... keep a set there and that way updating your offsite copies is as effortless as taking a set to work.

      The best backup plans are effortless or horribly easy. I.E. I take the offsite-A home with me every friday, and my boss Takes Offsite-B to his home on wednesday. Yes, if we have our building explode... we will be behind by 2 days... Whoopde-doo... we have 99.95% of our company data intact.. plus we keep a CD-R monthly copy set offsite at the records storage.. we have 65 CD sets there to date.. and we are now starting the destruction process WITH the paperwork and data...

      make it effortless... if you have to make a trip to the bank... you wont do it very much.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:Three words: by derch · · Score: 1

      I was going to say I'm glad I live in an area w/o a record of natural disasters, then I noticed 'Bio/Chem Attack'... How exactly would that kill magnetic and optical media backups? The backups are more likely to survive an anthrax or nerve gas attack than I am.

      As far as the first four, I'm glad I live in a part of the US that isn't seismically active, has almost no severe weather, and is rural. The others, like other posters, fuck my backup, i'm glad to live.

    17. Re:Three words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the probability that something happens both to your home and to your bank is quite slim.

      s/b both to your home and to your bank, but leaving you and civilization unscathed.. is quite slime

    18. Re:Three words: by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I'm dead what do I care if the backups are unavailable until after probate. At that point I am pretty sure that backups fall into the "Somebody Else's Problem" category.

    19. Re:Three words: by ebh · · Score: 1
      Why is everyone ignoring the most logical of offsite storage?? your work.

      Because my employer is well within its rights to take anything of "mine" at work and search it. Even worse, consider having it read out in open court in case of a subpoena of all the company's "business records".

      My critical data is also highly confidential, like my financial records and my personal business correspondence. Locking it in a bank vault keeps it much farther from prying eyes than putting it in my desk drawer at work.

    20. Re:Three words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Where the hell is Grammar Nazi?!?

      Safe Deposit Box. Or even Safe-Deposit Box.

      Not Safety Deposit Box.

      Bugs me more than "irregardless" and incorrect use of their/there/they're. Don't get me started on its/it's.

    21. Re:Three words: by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2

      I would suggest that you read your employee handbook, especially the section entitled "No Expectation of Privacy" and then re-think whether or not you want your personal data locked up in a work-provided facility.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    22. Re:Three words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Safety deposit boxes are also nice since it may be a relatively long time before you can pick through the ruins of your home looking for a home safe.

      Also, you can keep pdf versions of your insurance and other documents as part of the backup which is a much nicer format since in the event of a disaster having searchable documents on the laptop you picked up overnight is very covenient indeed.

    23. Re:Three words: by pben · · Score: 1

      With Ashcroft and Poindexter on the loose do you think you have any privacy left? I bet that a business could get my credit card balance from other sources faster than I could pull it off a tape!

    24. Re:Three words: by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      Amanda does GPG. No one's reading anything aloud.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    25. Re:Three words: by joshuac · · Score: 2

      ---snip
      I would suggest that you read your employee handbook, especially the section entitled "No Expectation of Privacy" and then re-think whether or not you want your personal data locked up in a work-provided facility.

      ---snip

      If the critical backed up data (or the backup itself) is encrypted properly, who cares? Let 'em read it all they want :)

    26. Re:Three words: by Chris+Deckard · · Score: 1

      Think Andromeda Strain. Didn't it eat through some plastics?

      -Chris

    27. Re:Three words: by p-k4 · · Score: 1
      If this is a real concern then add them to your safe deposit box rental. Much like a bank account with multiple parties, it does not enter probate since it defaults to the other person.

      If you don't trust the person enough to have a key to your box then you shouldn't trust them on your network. :-)

      Now, if both you and your SO died, then you'd have a problem. But you of course have a will with a simultanous death clause.

      --
      Dean's Rule #45. The truth hurts for a moment. A lie hurts for a long time.
    28. Re:Three words: by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      I have, and you know what, it doesn't matter what you sign or what they tell you, your personal property is yours and they ARE NOT allowed to look at it for any reason. Can they come up to you and demand your wallet and rifle through it? Strip search you? search your car in their parking lot?

      anyone that would allow it is a complete idiot. your company is not allowed to trample your civil rights, no matter what they think.

      And yes, I have stood up against management that way... they wanted to search cars in the parking lot.. I told them that if they even touch my car I'll sue them so fast and hard that they wouldnt be able to sit down for a week. It was funny because they called in an officer and asked the cop to open my car.. the cop said, " are you nuts? without a search warrant it's illegal." got in his car and left after screaming at my bosses boss about making false police reports and wasting city time. That guy didn't work there much longer after I had my lawyer file a legal complaint directly to the companies CEO..."

      your company can blow all the hot air they want... they can do crap and they know it... and you had better know it too.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    29. Re:Three words: by Sheridan · · Score: 1
      Bear in mind in that case you still need a safe offsite place somewhere to keep your private key in order to read the backups.

      Unless you are writing the key to the backup media as well and just relying on the passphrase protection of the key!

    30. Re:Three words: by p_trinli · · Score: 1

      The one thing those backups contain that might cause a problem for my wife is the MS Money backup.

      That and the hardcore pornography, of course.

    31. Re:Three words: by sowellfan · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of Y2K. At my church the pastor had referenced the Y2K problem since the beginning of 1999 (or before), talking about how folks needed to get financially stable and make prudent arrangements because of potentially tough times ahead. The funny part is that at a womens meeting, the pastors wife was trying to sell butane-powered hair curlers to the other ladies (in case the power died). I wasn't too worried about 9/11, but I got a kick out of thinking about those ladies trying to make sure that their hair was done up proper in the event that they found themselves in a post-apocalypse society (I'd think you'd want to be less attractive after the fall, so you'd be less likely to be raped by the rampaging gangs of the warlords).

    32. Re:Three words: by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2
      And yes, I have stood up against management that way.

      I'm suprised that you're still employed. As the lawyers have described it to me, it's perfectly OK for your employer to say, "OK, go collect your last paycheck then." If you work in an at-will state and are not under a Union contract, you're gone. No legal recourse whatsoever and a hell of a lot of explaining to do at your next job interview. You might even be unable to collect unemployment, since you were fired for cause (insubordination, to be precise).

      That also doesn't cover the situation where John Law walks in after hours and serves a warrant on your desk. With that statement in the book, your employer is legally covered when they say "go ahead." Again, you have no recourse, since you agreed the "no expectation of privacy" statement in hte handbook when you accepted a paycheck.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    33. Re:Three words: by sphealey · · Score: 2
      Hey, man, if all/some that shit happens, the last thing I am going to fscking care about is my backups. I think I will be glad if I am alive, and go from there...
      Respectfully, I would have to disagree. The day after the earthquake (I live a bit too close to the New Madrid fault in central North America) you will of course be busy seeing to your family, helping neighbors, making living arrangements, etc.

      But the day after the day after? People do survive disasters you know. Consider London during the Blitz - people lived and worked there throughout, actually increasing industrial production while the bombs fell around them. If you are a system administrator you have a responsibiity to your coworkers and fellow citizens to ensure that your organization can get back on its feet after a disaster, so people can get back to work and start to recover their lives and the economy in which they make their living.

      sPh

    34. Re:Three words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonderful fantasy world you live in. Where do you make up these stories? YOu must watch alot of Law and Order, after all,having all that time living in your parents basement.

      You probably sucked the cop off and swallowed his load, in exchange he didn't search your car.

    35. Re:Three words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh good idea dumbass, you must stink like a rotting sperm whale carcas since you have all that shit in your head instead of brains. Why the fuck would anyone bring their personal data and information to work? Read your terms of employment and you will see that they have the right to search your desk, files, computer, laptop, whatever, whenever they want.

      Yeah, I want my sensitive personal info where it can be taken without any notice. Fuckin idiot!

    36. Re:Three words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have, and you know what, it doesn't matter what you sign or what they tell you, your personal property is yours and they ARE NOT allowed to look at it for any reason.

      Yes, but you desk, computer, filing cabinet, laptop, etc is not yours-it's belongs to the company, and they can fucking do what they want with it, and afterhours too while you're jerkin your gerkin to pics of the Backstreet Boys in your parents basement.

      And yes, I have stood up against management that way... they wanted to search cars in the parking lot.. I told them that if they even touch my car I'll sue them so fast and hard that they wouldnt be able to sit down for a week.

      Brilliant! No they can't search your car, Ironside, it's your personal property. But are you gonna keep all your private stuff in your car, alongside your 12" black dildo collection?

      Do us a favor....wait until you finish grade school before taking about the real world.

    37. Re:Three words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right to work state... has right to work laws.. they CANNOT fire you for defending your rights.

      We have plenty of labor lawyers here that happily take on larger companies... espically for any kinds of employee rights.

      yes it is perfectly ok for them to tell you that... as it is perfectly ok for me to sue them for breach of contract, Harassment, and several other things that are nasty to deal with for companies.... espically when they get out in the public eye..

      Finally... it doesnt matter what I agree to or dont agree to. (my signed employee contract has several sections struck out by me) if it violates any state or federal laws... then it doesnt matter...

      Dammit people, why dont you have the balls to stand up for yourselves? employees are doing the employer a favor.... it's not the other way around... no matter what the self serving suits try to say.

      Besides.. this was over a year ago.. and we are union now because of the managements' idiot tactics that happened to be created by that one idiot manager. I am sure that my letter was only one of the straws... but it helped to break his back.

      Any company that tries any of that crap... needs to become unionized and shown who is boss....

      The workers are in charge... not the idiots who managed to get suits.

    38. Re:Three words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow you have no balls...

      you are such a pussy that you dont have the balls to post with your login...

      women must look completely butch next to you because you are such a pussy.

      a ball-less pussy that I can more than likeyl beat eaily not only mentially but physically.. you fat turd... get out of your parent's basement and get a job.... if you can fit out the door anymore...

  8. Fireproof safes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, beware that many safes that advertise fire resistence are NOT useful for protecting many forms of computer media (magnetic and/or optical) but are meant to keep paper from burning. Long before paper burns, most media will have long since expired (melted, etc.). Also look for one that's waterproof/resistent. It would be a bummer to have your stuff survive the fire, but not the subsequent fire dept.'s deluge.

  9. How many buildings must burn by Phronesis · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When I was in graduate school, I saw enough disasters (laboratory floods, thefts, etc.) that the watchword became, "How many buildings must burn down for me to lose my dissertation data?" Multiple complete backups in multiple distinct buildings, separated by large distances on the scale of a firebreak was the standard.

    One fellow, who was paranoid about the permanence of magnetic media, even kept a copy of his raw data on punch cards (cartons of them).

    1. Re:How many buildings must burn by Bald+Wookie · · Score: 3, Funny

      One fellow, who was paranoid about the permanence of magnetic media, even kept a copy of his raw data on punch cards (cartons of them).

      I put mine on Kazaa as [tmd]8mile.(ftf).ts.(1of2)_COMPLETE!!1!

      Who said P2P doesn't have substantial non-infringing uses?

    2. Re:How many buildings must burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genius. With the 1 between the !s and everything.

    3. Re:How many buildings must burn by habig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since my thesis experiment was in Italy but I was back in Indiana while writing up, I backed stuff up over the net to computers at the Italian lab, plus several different computers at IU. Each location was a mainframe (go VMS!) with its own IT professionals backing up those disks too.

      So, to lose my thesis, meteors would have to hit simultaneously on opposite sides of the world, at which point I'd have far larger problems than graduating :)

    4. Re:How many buildings must burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew a fellow who had a year or two of his life spent on research data for his thesis. It was on one (1) 9 track mag tape, and the operators mounted the wrong tape for writing one day...

    5. Re:How many buildings must burn by YoungHack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is why I kept a CVS archive of my dissertation
      (done in TeX) with always at least two current
      checkouts going, one at school and one at home.

      I got the advantage of data stored on more than
      one machine at all times, together with freedom
      from the fear that I might not be working on
      the right set of files since I had version control.

      BTW I totally recommend checking your TeX files
      into CVS. When my thesis advisor would tell
      me to make a large edit (i.e. rearrange Chp 2 in
      a completely different order) I had the courage
      to "dive right in". Without the comfort of
      knowing I could unroll a goof, the trepidation
      of a large change would have slowed me down
      immensely.

      At the very end, when I couldn't even stand to
      read my own writing any longer, I would just
      check the spelling of my "diffs" before checking
      in changes and make sure they made sense in
      context.

  10. Portable hard drive by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Plain and simple.. hard drives are cheaper.. the USB/Firewire enclosures usually add $80 USD to the cost though. Thing is, you can plop that in to your briefcase or bookbag and take it with ya. Another option I was looking into was USB drives.. still costly though.

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    1. Re:Portable hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Portable hard drive

      Fujitsu drives seem like the perfect choice...

    2. Re:Portable hard drive by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      and what happens when you drop it and it no longer works?

      cd/dvd/tape/punch cards; usually still work after being dropped

    3. Re:Portable hard drive by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

      Well.. as the hard drive is a backup device and not a primary device... it should be replacable.. as all backup media are. If you require a more permanent storage solution, go for a web based solution: http://www.xdrive.com

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    4. Re:Portable hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can plop that in to your briefcase or bookbag and take it with ya.
      So can the guy who mugs you/breaks into your car.

  11. Well... by RinkSpringer · · Score: 2

    I rarely back stuff up. I can MP3 my CD if I need to, and no one cares about pr0n anyway ... or do they?

    For the stuff I *want* to save, I usually store them somewhere on my homepage (it's neatly backed up in 2 locations), and I burn it on CD.

  12. safety deposit box at the bank by dreamt · · Score: 2

    I have a box at my local bank. I take a tape there every few weeks or so for my home machines. My father who works from home takes tapes there every week. Just have a set of tapes to rotate in to the bank every so often. Box is something like $35/year. Worth having for other non-computer valuables as well.

  13. My backup plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have everything important -- not everything, just everything IMPORTANT -- backed up to DVD+RW and stored in a fireproof safe in the basement.

    I also have the house inspected regularly to make sure there's nothing that can CAUSE a fire, such as bad wiring. A lot of people skip this step.

    I'm not worried about losing my program settings or anything piddly like that. I'm worried about the artwork and novels and such that I could never replace under any circumstances.

    DVD+RW, BTW, has an estimated media life of 100 years, so I don't feel too bad about trusting my stuff to it.

  14. Not really "fireproof" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those little fireproof safes aren't really fireproof - not the cheap ones available at office supply stores anyway. In a big fire the interior of those small safes will get hot enough to ruin CDR or DVD backup media.

    I would suggest the following: store your data on disk in such a way that it is simple to backup, buy a DVD writer to blast the backup data to DVD media weekly (cheap, fast convenient), and store the backup DVDs away from your office - at home, out in the garage, in your car's glovebox, etc.

  15. CDRW monthly, network backups, firesafe by tyrelb · · Score: 1

    Hi!

    I run CDRW backups monthly for all important information -- documents, e-mail, etc. I do not backup software (i.e. Office, Windows, etc.).

    If I want to make a quick backup, I just ZIP a file and transfer it to the computer server 2 floors down (in the basement). I figure this will help in the case that my hard drive on my workstation fails.

    I also store important CDRW + CDRs in a fireproof safe. I store this in the basement, thinking that a fire will most likely start on the main or second floor -- and that fire will travel up instead of down (my knowledge of fire is not too good).

    I also used to run a script that would create backups on a daily basis, and copy files to ZIP or on the server. That way, if I ever had to go back and retrieve information from a specific day, I could.

    I have ALSO used cheap web hosting that had lots of disk space available and FTP'd files to their server. Probably not the most secure method, but could be cost-effective.

    1. Re:CDRW monthly, network backups, firesafe by Tassach · · Score: 2
      I have ALSO used cheap web hosting that had lots of disk space available and FTP'd files to their server. Probably not the most secure method, but could be cost-effective.
      If security is important, encrypt your backups prior to uploading them. Of course, a cheap web host service probably has no guarantees about reliability / availability / accuracy / etc. Service level agreements drive the cost up significantly.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    2. Re:CDRW monthly, network backups, firesafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once worked in a 14 story building in the heart of the city. One weekend, there was a fire on the seventh floor. Floors above were smoke-damaged. Floors below: water damage.
      We had a mini in our department. The cooling fans drew all sorts of soot onto all of the boards. It took three techs over three days to get it back to something workable, including component replacements.

      Basements are the first place to fill up with fire-fighting water.

    3. Re:CDRW monthly, network backups, firesafe by F452 · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to my setup. I have a 60GB drive on my 2nd floor workstation and another on a server in the basement. I keep these in synch as necessary. I backup my main data to CDRW every week (put in home safe), and bring CDRs to a safe deposit box every 6 months. (CDRWs every two months.) Oh, and most nights I copy the files that have changed since the weekly backup to a daily zip disk (one for each day).

      I feel pretty safe with this setup. As discussed in other threads, if my data gets totally wiped out somehow, I'll probably have bigger things to worry about.

  16. Protecting my backups by ralphus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I back everything up to large firewire hard drives on a rotating basis. I keep a set of near line that are in my house and turned off for emergency restores and then monthly copies offsite. Nothing fireproof or high security, just in another location where they aren't likely to get lost or stolen or to have both my house and the storage location both burn down at once. I have had one house fire in the past, even just the smoke from a small fire can do incredible damage to electronics (not to mention the rest of the house).

    I've found that the bigger problem for me is how the heck to find some backup solution that is cheap enough for home usage and doesn't just involve using multiple hard drives and can handle around 500 GB of data in a timely manner. I think that is a lost game

    --
    Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
    1. Re:Protecting my backups by jasonditz · · Score: 2

      Will a fireproof safe generally allow you to put a firewire harddrive in it? If so can you get a refund on the safe?

  17. What do you do to protect your backups? by GMontag · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do you do to protect your backups?

    I use the squirrel method, hiding my data on the drives of unsuspecting dupes all over the internet.

    Unfortunately, I can't remember where all of these bits are, so if my primary system gets messed up I am going to be dataless :(

    1. Re:What do you do to protect your backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dateless? /.

    2. Re:What do you do to protect your backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, if I meant "dateless" I would hide my backups in my pants ;-)

    3. Re:What do you do to protect your backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the world's largest collection of pr0n. I keep it on the hard drives of the world. Maybe you've seen it.

    4. Re:What do you do to protect your backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was almost my post, but I thought against it. Hope yooou are modded up.

      Montag

  18. My solution by Strog · · Score: 1

    I tend to post all my documents on discussion forums so I can retrieve them later.

    Most of the rest of the stuff is readily available for download (patches, pics, etc.). It real easy to replace mp3s that are missing the end of the song anyway. :-)

  19. Fire at the University of Twente by Slycee · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's nothing compared to what happened to the Univeristy of One through the University of Nineteen. Let's hope they realize their mistakes with the release of the University of Twente-One

    1. Re:Fire at the University of Twente by tigress · · Score: 2, Funny

      University of One to Three were destroyed. University of Four disappeared shortly after it was constructed. Then, we built University of Five...

    2. Re:Fire at the University of Twente by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      surprised there are no babylon 5 moderators today...

    3. Re:Fire at the University of Twente by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... the comments of universities 1-19, and building university 21 are more appropriately referenced to the Thraddash culture of "Star Control 2", not "Babylon 5".

    4. Re:Fire at the University of Twente by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, all of the universities Spontaneously Combusted.. whoa, there goes another one.

    5. Re:Fire at the University of Twente by TaoJones · · Score: 1
      "University of One to Three were destroyed. University of Four disappeared shortly after it was constructed. Then, we built University of Five...


      It sank into the swamp. So, I built a sixth one. That sank into the swamp. So, I built a seventh one. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp, but the eighth one... stayed up!
      __
      "He was summarily keel-hauled, demoted to Bilge Hand - Fourth Class, and
      assigned to Pointless Lubrication Duty."

      Unknown

      --
      "Fear is the rootkit of democracy.." Blarkon
    6. Re:Fire at the University of Twente by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      darned linux.. should never have asked the students to test the firewall...

  20. Get a safe deposit box. by Prince_Ali · · Score: 2

    Home safes are only fire proof to a point. House fires can be hot enough to melt steel. I wouldn't want to take that chance with something that I could not replace. It sounds good for backups, but for data that you want to be extra careful with (code basically) a safe deposit box would be more appropriate. I have a professor who keeps CD-R backups of all of his code in a safe deposit box. I'm sure you could fit a couple magnetic tapes in there too if you want total backup.

    1. Re:Get a safe deposit box. by CentrX · · Score: 1

      Here's actually an interesting case where open-source software is a great help. Releasing your code can, if it's good, get it all over the net.

      --

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:Get a safe deposit box. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you live in an apartment (flat) then a small plastic (moisture proof) box can be easily tucked away in the back garden. That steel melting house fire is not going to affect the cool earth in the back garden. It is not like it has any high monetary value. You did encrypt it right? It is not the kind of thing anybody would want to steal. If you are more concerned, hide another one else where. They are not all going to be found/stolen the same day your house burns down

  21. What do I do? by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have CowboyNeal hold on to my offsite backups.

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:What do I do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He just stores them in his large arse!

  22. cool by tps12 · · Score: 2

    Well, data protection is sort of an interesting topic, so I'm glad this story is running. I'm interested in what strategies people have to defend against Murphy. ;)

    I am, however, a little curious as to what is so important on a home network that offsite backups and a fireproof safe (!!) would be considered. In the grand scheme of things, are your pornography collection and your high score in Lemmings really that important?

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:cool by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      what about 8-9 years of email? my thesis? custom firewall/sendmail/other rules that would take ages to rewrite? digital pictures taken at important events in my life?

      These are just some examples why I am probably going to go through the 'offsite box at my bank' route pretty soon...

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    2. Re:cool by GMontag · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ooops! In my other post I forgot about my porn!

      I keep multiple copies of that on 5.25, 3.5, CD, DVD and punchcards hidden throughout Northern Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania. My home copies are on 2 identical RAID 5 systems backed up to compressed Exabyte tape librarys (one in my apartment, one connected wirelessly to my garage on the same property but 3 buildings away). The apartments have a sprinkler system, so the RAID and Exabyte cabinets are tented with plastic. Working on an archive for my vehicle that backs up through an 802.11a connection whenever I park in the garage.

      It was just my defense contracting work I was talking about here

    3. Re:cool by Jon-o · · Score: 1

      That stuff isn't. But close to a decade of personal mail, writings for school, recordings I've made, the hours I've put into configuring everything, etc... would be damn nice to have around. Especially the e-mail - mine doesn't actually go back more than about 5 years, because I stupidly erased it all without a backup, and then reinstalled windows over it. *sigh*

      Since then I've amassed a large quantity of mail, a lot of which would be a serious disappointment to lose.

    4. Re:cool by exhilaration · · Score: 2
      Websites I've designed, my graphic design work, my papers from high school & college, older copies of my resume', pictures I've scanned or taken with a digital camera, source code, help files and how-to's I've amassed, every e-mail I've sent or received since 1996, a recipe (I have only one), bits and pieces of poetry that I hope to someday get published, etc. etc. etc.

      The value of information is subjective - one man's garbage is another man's treasure (or something like that).

    5. Re:cool by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      For me, it's mostly pictures, and most of those are either of my wedding or my daughter. In most cases I don't have access to negatives or prints for these (although if I did, they would probably burn with the rest of the house). While I could certainly live without them, it would really suck to lose them. That's not really much of an issue, though, since we're talking less than 1G of fairly static data, so a CD-R and a bank safe-deposit box, rotated once a month, is more than sufficient for my needs.

      I've certainly lost plenty of stuff in the past that I still wish I had, though. I collect interesting quotes, of which I've lost a few substantial text files, for example. Again, though, that's something I could totally live without, and had I thought about it at the time I would have just backed them up to my homepage space.

      Although I don't have any serious need for backups, I can see how other people might. I'm not a person who tends to collect stuff, and I don't place a high value on the data I do collect.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    6. Re:cool by fwankypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am probably going to go through the 'offsite box at my bank' route pretty soon...

      ...Famous last words...

      --
      The time of day is 29:33.
    7. Re:cool by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2

      My home copies are on 2 identical RAID 5 systems backed up to compressed Exabyte tape librarys (one in my apartment, one connected wirelessly to my garage on the same property but 3 buildings away). The apartments have a sprinkler system, so the RAID and Exabyte cabinets are tented with plastic.

      This reminded me of a customer of the company I work for. They had a system set up with 2 Servers, a data mirror between them, and each server had the database mirrored localy. Basically, there were 4 drives with identical copies of the database. Actually a pretty normal setup for us. However, they made the simple mistake of not having an off-site backup, and lost thier data when someone flew a plane into the building. (They used to be in the WTC.)
      Fortunatly, the data really wasn't the, lose it and the business dies, type. It was just a pain for them to have to re-create. But still, made me realize that shit can happen on a large scale, and its worthwhile to keep a copy of important data somewhere else.
      As for my home machine, I don't bother. What am I going to lose? My Diablo 2 characters, oh well, it'll be fun building up new ones; my RPG notes, what few I have written down I could redo from scratch easily enough; my porn collection, I thought that's what the internet was for, a mass porn storage and retrieval system.
      If it matters, put it somewhere well away from the system. Safe Deposit box, Exchange CDs with a friend. A local solution is just asking for something to manage to take both the system and the backup out in one fell swoop.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    8. Re:cool by ebh · · Score: 2

      Just for starters, I have financial records which keep me from being completely fux0red if I ever get audited by the IRS.

    9. Re:cool by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      My uncle has run his tax preparation business out of his home for the last 30 years. I finally got him to make daily updates to his monthly CD-RW and then dupe that to CD-R at the end of each month. Then he keeps a copy in his fireproof safe, the glove compartment in his car for quick getaways, and he exchanges backups with his best friend and neighbor up the street. By now, he may even mail monthly backups to his daughter in Michigan. He lives on the gulf coast of Florida and has to deal with hurricane season and fire season.

      I've sat in his hot tub watching fire copters dunk water buckets in a lake past his treeline.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    10. Re:cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah! but my por is backed up off site AND it feels like hot grits in my pants!

  23. Personal Security Box by _bug_ · · Score: 1

    Bought one of those little Brinks home security boxes that are usually found at your local mall or general purpose department store (Sears). About 30 bucks and it keeps its contents protected during fire.

    Put your backups to CD and you don't have to worry about floods. I once left a CD case out in the rain for a while. Didn't have any trouble with the CDs. Either air dry them or get a special cleaning cloth as tissues/paper towels will scratch.

    If you're using other media, go to a local hardware store and pickup some rubber sealing compound and mod the security box by placing a thin layer along the inside edge of the cover or the top edge of the box the cover goes over. Works pretty well. And it's cheap.

    1. Re:Personal Security Box by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You might want to check that box out with some blank data & a blowtorch, more than likely the media will melt before the box is damaged.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:Personal Security Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of us with backyards, off-house storage is easy. Got to your local hardware store and get some large diameter PVC pipe and some end caps.
      Put "stuff" in pipe, then seal with electrical tape (for short term storage) or RTV (for longer term), or just glue the cap on if it's in stash for the Apocalypse. Dessicant packs optional.
      Survivalists have been doing this for years.

  24. Don't forget... by puppetman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    just because you have a backup, doesn't mean it works.

    We were backing up our Oracle database with the export-utility, and DIRECT=Y flag. Well, unfortunately, sometimes a direct backup is corrupted (a direct backup bypasses all the SQL parsing, and unloads it directy from the tablespace).

    Now we restore our backups every few weeks to our development databases, to make sure they are working.

    1. Re:Don't forget... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most tape backup programs have a verify setting too, but that takes so long.

      I found it even quicker to replace /dev/st0 with /dev/null. I think GNU tar actually has code that detects when it is writing to that device to make things so even faster.

    2. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran into this at work. On the server that 'Never goes down.'

      Well it did, and our SQL database was backing up our data in ascii mode, and we lost all of our 'special characters.' Not to good, when your backing up French and Spanish text.

    3. Re:Don't forget... by dildatron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, that's what I do to. I have found if I jsut cp everything I need to /dev/null the data transfer is SUPER fast. I haven't needed to recover anything yet, but the speed at which I can back up my system is so fast that I can afford to do full backups several times a day. It must go to a spot on my hard drive platter that is near the spindle and can spin really fast - but I'm not a kernel hacker so I'm not really sure.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    4. Re:Don't forget... by tetsuo13 · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      I used to do nightly backups to a tap. One day, that server crashed severely on me and I had lost 90% of the data on the hard drives. I thought I was safe because of the nightly backups but when I tried to read the tapes from a different machine I kept getting an error saying the tape is unreadable and needs to be reformatted! I have *years* of C++ code from college, personal stuff and my business that I can't access -- not to mention GB's of other important information.

      Neddless to say I don't trust my DAT drive anymore and I've moved onto CD-R's.

    5. Re:Don't forget... by MmmmAqua · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, if the author of this message's parent had been running Oracle in archivelog mode, he/she could just have backed up the physical database files and the archivelogs, instead of using Oracle's crappy exp/imp tools and putting the data at risk of irretrievable loss.

      The moral of the story: never forget that there is more than one way to backup your data, and if you're going to spend US$40k/CPU on database software, be sure you can also afford to hire someone who knows how to run it.

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    6. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used a CDRW to backup my data from Windows once. I had zero length files in subdirectories. CDRW is no better than any other media in terms of data correctness. Thank heavens my root directory was ok and I had some redundant zip files there.

      Verification is half the backup process!

    7. Re:Don't forget... by puppetman · · Score: 2

      We do have archived logs turned on, and they stream over to our standby database.

      This is running on Win2k, so copying physical database files is not possible. RMan would be a better solution, but I don't trust,

      1) Repositories that need to be installed for a feature. I still have nightmares about that with Designer 2k.

      2) Incremental backups.

      As for Win2k in a production environment, one of our servers (including the database) was up for 120+ days, with an average Oracle load of 14%. Pretty good.

      Our other server (I just checked) has been up for 6500 hours. That's 270ish days, with a 5% load on Oracle.

      As *the* DBA, *the* database architect, the senior developer, and the person who moved the database environment from a Veritas high-availability system running on a million dollars worth of Sun hardware to $4,000 worth of Intel servers to save the company, I think I know more than enough to be able to make an informed decision.

    8. Re:Don't forget... by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      Just hope your disks never crash. Restoring from null is such a bitch.... and that is, if you can find the drivers (I think there are none for Linux). /lame joke

    9. Re:Don't forget... by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 2

      Well I'm a kernel hacker so I can speak to this. The truth is, /dev/null is actually a device that implements Zeosync compression. Data sent to it is repeatedly compressed using this amazing algorithm until it is one bit in length, and only then is that bit written to the disk. That's why it's so fast.

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    10. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You could use Veritas for the backups (or similar) ;)

      Tapes are really troublesome, though. I have learned to always have a full hard-disk backup just in case the tapes decide to fail...

    11. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody has been reading too much BOFH....

    12. Re:Don't forget... by dildatron · · Score: 2

      ahh.. i understand now. i think my geforce speeds it up a bit too. the compression must utilize the spare cycles in the nvidia GPU.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    13. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I believe you've got the wrong idea. The tracks towards the *outside* of the platter, away from the spindle, will yield a higher data transfer rate.

      While it's true that the inside of the platter "spins faster" (completes more revolutions in a fixed period of time), the linear velocity, as a function of the radial distance from the spindle is the key in determining the amount of data that can actually be read/written.

    14. Re:Don't forget... by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      While it's true that the inside of the platter "spins faster" (completes more revolutions in a fixed period of time),

      Wow, you must be using one of those "wind-up" hard drives.... made like a clock spring. :)

    15. Re:Don't forget... by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      That may help...however, with something complex as an Oracle database, you may be getting good backups of a file, but what if you backed the database up while it was running, or didn't include one file into the backup.

      While you may have a great tape copy of the files, they may be worthless.

  25. Arcus. by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

    They come get the dupes of the backups, and then hide them in a big hole in the ground.

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  26. The value of DATA by oldstrat · · Score: 2

    I'm sure that most of us undervalue the data we have stored on our personal equipment.
    Then again maybe not, usually when something gets degaused from one of my machines, I have it somewhere else on another.
    But your point is well taken, what would the impact be if I lost all the machines on my LAN at the same time?

    Is there a 'smart' way for me to back it up, or how would I even start to evaluate which amoung the folders of fodder were the ones to back up.
    Financial stuff would be obvious and easy, but beyond that it starts to get real muddy real quick.
    And then, how do I secure my backup?

    1. Re:The value of DATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was once thinking about how the operating system or the file system should compute the value of a file depending on how much human or computer time was spend on it.
      Obviously, if I have a journal that I update every day, it must be valuable.
      Also a file that is the merge of valuable file should be valuable.
      Any idea on how this could be implemented. How could the system know if a file is the product of human time (like when I edit a file with vi) or the product of computer time (like the kernel that took 1 hour to compile).
      Once we know what is valuable, it should be easy to know what to backup. ;-)

    2. Re:The value of DATA by oldstrat · · Score: 1

      You could assume a file changed every day would be valuable, but then it might just be a cache file of some sort.
      On the other hand a household inventory or Will might be updated yearly and far more valuable than the cache file (and probably smaller).

      Of course a full back up is the most desired, but also the least likely.

      Personally I think this needs to be tied to the applications and the file system (I have a not so vague suspicion that this is what archive bits were intended for).

  27. Connected.com rules by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I sleep in blissful peace because of this product: Connected Online Backup. All the files that change get backed up over the Internet every night on my system. It also does partial-file backups, so it figures out which part of a particular file actually changes, which works well for huge files like e-mail folders (my e-mail file is like 200 megabytes, and it typically moves about 20K every day). Of course, it automatically compresses the data when sending it.

    Security? It encrypts your data BEFORE it leaves your PC, and the security password remains on your computer. They are careful to tell you that if you lose your password, they can't recover your data.

    I've only had to restore a file a couple of times, but the few times I've done it seemed to work well. They also have a CD ordering option.

    The last time I posted about these guys some people said that restoring a lot of data tended to be kind of slow, but I don't have experian with that.

    Oh, the price? $14.95 a month, and I have several gigabytes backed up. Can't beat the price, can't beat the peace of mind. This service rocks.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Connected.com rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great

      Now even Slashdot gets SPAM...

    2. Re:Connected.com rules by forged · · Score: 3, Informative
      My company has deployed Netstore backup on all our laptops throughout the company (1000's), which does exactly the same thing as the program you describe. Netstore connects to a centralized server and only backup the important directories (read: user data). It works automatically at a pre-determined time interval, and if rather unobstrusive. I have actually saved files using it.

      Of course, next comes the question about what happens if the server takes fire. I'd imagine there is a redundant unit somewhere, but that is just a guess.

    3. Re:Connected.com rules by buss_error · · Score: 2
      I sleep in blissful peace because of this product: Connected Online Backup

      So you are comfortable with your backups residing with a dot com company. While farming out things can be nice for garbage and other waste removal, I don't think I'd be happy with someone else doing my backups. But then, I'm hypercritical and paranoid. Some of the technical people I respect have taken this view, but I'm too old fashioned to like it much.

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    4. Re:Connected.com rules by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> I'm hypercritical and paranoid

      I wouldn't say so.

      I've seen clients relying on such .com winners as iDrive and the like for backups.

      When the bubble burst, so did their piece of mind.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Connected.com rules by mosch · · Score: 2
      I use this service too, for my quicken files, but the lack of a high-capacity option, and the lack of a Mac or FreeBSD client keeps me from being able to use Connected Online as a one-stop backup solution.

      On the plus side, the restore isn't slow. I did a test restoration, to make sure the service actually worked, and it went flawlessly and got me my half gig or so of quicken data as fast as my connection would allow.

    6. Re:Connected.com rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      For that price, you can have storage companies such as "Iron Mountain" come out once a week and store your weekly tapes.

    7. Re:Connected.com rules by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      and the lack of a Mac or FreeBSD client keeps me from being able to use Connected Online as a one-stop backup solution.

      You're not supposed to do it, but I make a bunch of zip files out of my Linux data that I move over to my Windows machine every night.

      got me my half gig or so of quicken data as fast as my connection would allow.

      A half-a-gig of Quicken data?? How many checks do you write every month?? I have like 7 years worth of data, and it's only around 7 meg.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    8. Re:Connected.com rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tip:
      Their method of storage (for protection of only the portions of files that change) requires that BOTH encryption keys be stored on their server.

      ie. Their encryption is not secure.

    9. Re:Connected.com rules by SquadBoy · · Score: 2

      No no you are not in fact if anything this proves that you are just smart. In any case let me tell you a little story about paranoia they thought I was paranoid when we decided to bolock ActiveX. Then you get a thing like this mornings shiny new MS hole that proves me %100 right. Never ever ever trust anything really important to someone that runs MS.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    10. Re:Connected.com rules by CodeWheeney · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately, the poster of this Ask Slashdot question is the CEO of Connected.com.

      --
      C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
    11. Re:Connected.com rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happens when connected.com catches fire?
      Are they also offloading the backups to someone else?

    12. Re:Connected.com rules by mosch · · Score: 1

      well, I just re-checked. It's actually 380mb of quicken data, which seems big to me too, but it's what's there. maybe it stores an illogical amount of historical stock price data or something, i dunno.

    13. Re:Connected.com rules by afidel · · Score: 2

      Dude Connected is NOT a dot com, these guys have a serious product with very large clients. For an example I'm told that each server costs 1/4 million and they are normally installed in pairs. Our company currently has over a dozen of these clusters installed world wide with terabytes of data being backed up daily. As long as you don't use the heal wizard feature their product rocks. They do compression, change vectoring, encryption, and have a dead simple interface. The product is easy to use and as long as you don't do something insanely stupid when setting up custom exclusion rules you WILL get your data back. As far as what happens if the servers catch fire, you grab the tapes and restore the servers to new hardware, most you should be out is a day or two's data. If you really wanted to you could backup using a virtual san over wan to a remote tape silo but that costs a bit in bandwidth.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    14. Re:Connected.com rules by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      That's insane. You must be using some feature that I'm not using that uses a huge amount of space, although I can't imagine what that would be. Maybe it's time to run the Quicken datafile analysis program? :)

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    15. Re:Connected.com rules by vidnet · · Score: 2

      You do know that a company's website isn't representative of their server farms, right?

    16. Re:Connected.com rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, sounds a lot like:

      #rsync -aze ssh datadir server.at.work:backupdir

    17. Re:Connected.com rules by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      In most cases that I have been able to verify for myself yes yes it is. Most companies use one OS throughout. I would be very suprised if they had the website on Windows and the server farms on a Unix.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    18. Re:Connected.com rules by dissy · · Score: 2

      Our company does something similar but we run the service ourself.

      Two machines in outside COLO centers, which among other things, run BackupPC software
      http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

      Its one of the better backup packages out there and I would highly recomend to anyone that likes live online backups to disk.

      The software uses tar over ssh for unix and smbclient for windows, can backup hosts on static IPs as well as by netbios names for windows clients or unix DHCP clients.

      Restores can be done directly with the tar over ssh / smbclient options, or it can send the files in a tar or zip file over your browser.

      It does full backup and incramentals, and uses hardlinking as well as compression on the server side.

      275gigs of data accrost multiple machines for the past month packed into 42 gigs of space on the backup server.

      Best part is its live, so restores are quick and easy.

      You also define an owner for each machine, and when you log into the web frontend with a user/pass, that user only sees his/her own machines.
      Of course you can also define admin users that see all machines, or can even have only one user that is an admin and not use that aspect.

      Sorry to sound like an ad, but this backup package is best for the price if you run your own datacenter or network with a spare fileserver.

      Run one local and one over the net from a colo and your good to go!

    19. Re:Connected.com rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our four years worth of data got too large for Quicken Pro to store, period. We only sent-out about 400 invoices per month and entered about 250 (insert unhappy face here) payments per month. I don't understand why CPA's recommend that software when it's so limited in what it can store. Backing-up got to be a huge headache.

    20. Re:Connected.com rules by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      That's a joke, right?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    21. Re:Connected.com rules by cfreeze · · Score: 2

      I am not in any affiliated with connected.com.

    22. Re:Connected.com rules by dpol · · Score: 1

      According to http://www.connected.com/company/executive_team.as p, Bob Brennan is the CEO of Connected. What reasons do you have to believe that cfreeze (the poster) is indeed Mr. Bob Brennan?'

      Or did I just miss out on a joke? :-)

      --
      -- David Polberger Computer Science major, University of Lund, Sweden
    23. Re:Connected.com rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not supposed to do it, but I make a bunch of zip files out of my Linux data that I move over to my Windows machine every night.
      Gee, why not? Looking at the appropriate part of their FAQ, I don't see a restriction against it.

    24. Re:Connected.com rules by zogger · · Score: 1

      geez man hope you haven't gotten owned and maybe hosting some "interesting stuff" you didn't know about. That would be my first impression finding that much unexplainable "data" in some directory or folder. I would go #@$#$7, get off the net, and really take a look at it.

    25. Re:Connected.com rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No here's a joke, a 6'2" rabbit walks into a bar...

    26. Re:Connected.com rules by |<amikaze · · Score: 2

      Dont post a link on slashdot, you should be fine.

    27. Re:Connected.com rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody said you were

      click the parent link in the post that you think accuses you and see what he was replying to

    28. Re:Connected.com rules by CodeWheeney · · Score: 2

      I meant the parent post as a joke. I see it was moderated : Informative=2, Funny=1, Total=3.

      Wow, I'm either remarkably subtle or really stupid. I'm goin' with the former. You gotta have hope.

      --
      C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
    29. Re:Connected.com rules by peter · · Score: 2

      > Of course, next comes the question about what happens if the server takes fire. I'd imagine there is a redundant unit somewhere, but that is just a guess.

      Then you just tell everyone to be extra careful not to lose any data until you can get a new backup server running. Err, you also hope that nobody's already screwed up their files and is in need of a restore.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  28. Just an outsider's opinion.. by vmfedor · · Score: 1
    This is just an outsider's opinion as I have no real experience in backing up any data in a significant, safe way, but (for large corporations, anyway) wouldn't it make sense to put your servers with sensitive data on them in some sort of 'fireproof room?'

    I'm not just talking glass, I'm talking a veritable safe. Sort of like where banks store their money. In the event of a fire, all you would have to do is shut the door to the 'server safe' and voila, you're protected. This is assuming the room is fireproof. A more sophisticated safe may shut off the ventilation system, and maybe the servers themselves.

    For the tapes themselves, usual backup rules apply. i.e., multiple physical locations, etc.

    Again, this is just a neophyte's opinion.. feel free to flame me if I'm way off-base, but I think these ideas are pretty practical and safe.

    - vmfedor

    --

    I like my women how I like my sugar.. granulated.

    1. Re:Just an outsider's opinion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't have helped the servers in the world trade center.

      Our server room had a Haylon system, that would extinguish most any fire (and all life forms). Doesn't do you much good if its on the second floor of a building that burns to the ground.

      Concrete bunker? What about floods? Nukes?

      There's no such thing as foolproof.

    2. Re:Just an outsider's opinion.. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Generally a lot cheaper and easier to simply have an emergency relocation location; a backup of your server room and equipment, if you will, in a different geographical area. This is commonly done for business that need it, and can afford it.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Just an outsider's opinion.. by mrjive · · Score: 1

      What happens if the entire building burns down (as was the case with Twente)? Even if the room is "fireproof" or fire protected, it wont stop several stories worth of brick and mortar from coming crashing down and destroying everything underneath it.

      Distributed off-site backup is the right solution for critical data, (and again, Twente' data was saved off-site so they only lost their hardware, but no data).

      --
      If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
  29. Simple answer by avoisin · · Score: 1

    Why, I give them to CowboyNeal, of course.

    He handles all my backups anyway.

  30. Incomplete... by Distan · · Score: 1

    Your data backup isn't complete unless you could be up and running after having all of your computer equipment seized, your safety deposit boxes frozen, and search warrants served on all of your known friends and family members.

    Maybe there is some sort of "off-shore" backup service in business?

    1. Re:Incomplete... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe there is some sort of "off-shore" backup service in business?

      isn't that what someone was putting together on sealand

  31. is your data that important? by jeepee · · Score: 1

    a nuclear bunker outside the house is the best way to keep your pr0n safe

    1. Re:is your data that important? by jeepee · · Score: 1

      and ho! i forgot to tell that a nuclear bunker the size of a couple of CDRW is'nt that expensive

  32. Data security by 1155 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot poll idea!

    How do you secure your data:

    1: Remote offsite backups
    2: CD/DVD/Floppy
    3: I don't, I live on the wild side
    4: .Mac
    5: Cowboyneal is my remote backup system of choice

    1. Re:Data security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you secure your data?
      I'll just retrieve it from the Office of Homeland Security; they probably have all my stuff anyway.

  33. work backups at home? no(13x)o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Get a corporate safe deposit box and use it.

    If company records are at your home, you're open to arrest for intellectual theft and espionage, even if the boss signed off on it, which I hope he didn't. Why would you want the financial records of your employer at your house? Gaaaaaaaaaaaak.

    1. Re:work backups at home? no(13x)o by MeerCat · · Score: 2


      Forgot to say, I don't live in the USA, and I work for small companies, so this isn't a concern for me although it's a valid point.

      Anyway, the point was more about taking my home-backups to work, and while I'm sure some lawyer could find a problem with this practice too, the fact is it works for me, and for "home backups" I'd suggest it's often a reasonable solution.

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
  34. Safety Deposit Box... by bic2k · · Score: 1

    Banks are fairly good at protecting these boxes. Its what they do best, right next to charging services fee's for servies that cost them nothing to provide. The trend these days seems to be 3rd party backup in a remote location. My box idea seems to serve that purpose well. There is a cost of course, but what form of backup isn't going to cost you in money and/or time?

    --
    --- its to bad about the monkey, I kinda liked them
  35. Getting a little paranoid are we? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 2

    If you are interested in truly protecting your data, you have to realize that making backups is just a start. Next comes protecting those backups from floods, fires, and other catastrophes that might occur. What do you do to protect your backups?

    If you lose your backups to fire, flood, or whatever, just make new backups. The percentage of incidents where you would lose both your backups and the originals (given that they are stored in separate places) has to be so minimal that only someone who is either incredibly paranoid or has some really, really important would need to do anything more than create one set of backups.

    1. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      I don't know about the "least" of your problems, I would think of it more as compounding or piling on to your problems. In the digital age I have photos (don't do the film thing anymore), personal records, emails, contact info for people I've long forgotten but am sure will need to contact again one day, etc on my computer, and if I lost all of that (including backups), then that would REALLY suck, BAD. But then again, that's the beauty of digital, I can backup all of our pics onto a cd (or several) and scatter them about significantly easier than I could do the same for my film.

    2. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      The percentage of incidents where you would lose both your backups and the originals (given that they are stored in separate places)

      Actually I think that this is exactly the info he was looking for. His statement was that it wasn't good enough to just make a backup and then throw it into your desk drawer, you should take further steps.

    3. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know about the "least" of your problems,

      Yeah, that's because you were too paranoid to click on the link, else you'd know... Or would that be the "worst" of his problems? ;-)

    4. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moderate parent down. link is a photo of bush, and on bush's laptop is the goatse guy.

    5. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      I live in FL. We have had Hurricanes take out half the state. Do you really think a safety deposit box at your bank is going to make much difference then being at your home? Both are going to be have an even chance of being totalled and have good odds that both will be at the same time. California and its earthquakes are going to be much the same.

      This is where internet storage and broadband becomes appealing.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    6. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by afidel · · Score: 2

      banks not immediatly on the coast are unlikely to sustain enough damage to take out their safety deposit room. The coast is a problem because of storm surge causing flooding but otherwise a bank should be well enough built that a hurricane should not do any appreciable damage. Now an F5 tornado is another story.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      This is southern Florida. There is not a piece of land 15feet above sea level. A large storm surge from a Category 5 Hurricane and 25 miles is under water. But I was talking more about the damage from the winds.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  36. My Solution by WaxParadigm · · Score: 1

    I backup onto an external HD weekly. I keep it in a fireproof safe/filing cabinet. The REALLY irreplacable stuff (digital pictures) I burn to CDs and bring a set to work in case the filing cabinet doesn't hold up.

    I highly recommend the "Turtle" cabinets you can get at Office Depot. They're around $360 for a 2-drawer (and weigh about 260lbs), but they are far superior to those Sentry safes and most other brands. In the future I plan to get one of those huge fireproof gun safes so I can keep my data and valuables REALLY well protected.

    This all just for a normal geek, I don't have any really sensitive data or anything...I just hate losing what I have.

    --
    I wish I could backup my brain.

  37. Safety Deposit Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fireproof safes tend to do a poor job of defending backup tapes against fire or flood.

    I would suggest taking a weekly full backup and storing it at your local bank. Safety deposit boxes are quite reasonable (they won't break the bank if you'll forgive the pun).

    Online backups are also a popular option, but this suggestion might prove both economical and efficient.

  38. OnLine Storage by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

    I sometimes temporarily store small amounts of non-sensitive data on-line in an ftp account with my ISP. Also, you can usually add an additional e-mail account through your service provider - after that, encrypt, zip, pw and e-mail to yourself, but don't check that account for messages until you need to retrieve your backup data.

  39. BrightStor... not by supersmike · · Score: 1

    I thought about using BrightStor- but then I realized I could save $500,000 by using rsync to my parents' basement.

    1. Re:BrightStor... not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rsync is by far the easiest and most reliable way to go.

      a) store everything on your server drive
      b) rsync in cron your /home structure (or whatever you want) to a friend or family member with the same setup.
      c) Cooperate with said friend/family member/business and do the same for them.
      d) While your at it with the "trust" relationship, make sure you are each backup MX's for each other's mail too.
      e) Do it over SSH to ensure confidentiality.
      f) optionally put the store copy on an encrypted filesystem (like AFS - which has other advantages too) so even your trusted partner doesn't "see" the data. Ditto for you on their data.

      Best of all - no media, no personnel time, no fedex. It just "happens".

  40. rsync with cp -al by gambitdis · · Score: 5, Informative
    We have just created a new policy of backing up to a remote location using rsync and cp -al. Basically we do an rsync then daily copies on the backup machine using hard links. There is a very good introduction here.

    We're doing this in an enterprise environment, but it would be easy to co-ordinate between two friends as well.

    --derek

    gambitdesign.com

    1. Re:rsync with cp -al by mcm · · Score: 1

      Is there any way to encrypt the files before rsync copies them while leaving them unencrypted on my disk? rsync + cp -al is very appealing to me but I want encryption.

      Is anyone doing this? How?

    2. Re:rsync with cp -al by gambitdis · · Score: 1
      Yea, I forgot to mention that. Rsync works very well with SSH. You can generate a key on the backup server, upload the public portion to the server that you want to backup, and the rsync occurs over an ssh session. Quite effective. If you are interested, I could post some scripts. Just let me know.

      --derek

      gambitdesign.com

    3. Re:rsync with cp -al by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I'm the site's author. Do you need the files encrypted in the backup, during the copy, or both? You can ask me privately if you like; just send email to webmaster at the site. Otherwise I'll try to check back later tonight. By the way, this was mentioned on slashdot a while ago.

    4. Re:rsync with cp -al by mcm · · Score: 1

      I am sorry that I was not clear. I want the files to be encrypted before they leave my machine and to stay encrypted when on the remote machine. I know about ssh but want more than an encrypted connection.

      What would make me very happy would be options on rsync that would allow me to specify that all files should be run through one program before they are sent to the remote machine and another program before they are written back to the local disk. This would let me combine resource and data forks on the mac before backing up to a linux box, encrypt my files before sending them over the network and a number of other fun things.

      I have toyed with modifying rsync to allow this but not done anything serious yet.

    5. Re:rsync with cp -al by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rsync algorithm is not well-suited to encrypted data because under encryption, small changes in the source tend to get spread throughout the file. That said, rsync can still help you, but it will be slow. Encrypt the files one (or a few) at a time to a copied directory structure somewhere else on the machine, and rsync the encrypted file to the backup machine with the --whole-files option set. Rsync will not copy the (encrypted) file unless it is different from the one in the backup. Your other alternative is to find an encrypted file system that does not spread changes too far from the original.

    6. Re:rsync with cp -al by Cekica · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      I'm interested by your script. You can send them to
      papaDoc@videotron.ca of tell me where they are.

  41. scope of disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a sports news tv station. If we had a Twente-caliber fire, we would be off the air for months. If your business relies completly on expensive and uncommon technology, how can you plan for this kind of disaster?

    1. Re:scope of disaster by mkldev · · Score: 1

      1. Transmitter in a separate shack.
      2. Always keep equipment truck outside building.
      3. Make sure you have cameras in the truck.
      4. Make-goods for all your advertisers, since you won't have the automation racks, and won't be able to air as many spots by hand.

      If you do this, then 24 hours and a rented double-wide later, you can be back on the air if your studio burns. I'm not saying it'll be up to your usual standards, but there are always ways.

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
  42. Maintain Two Copies by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

    I just maintain two copies of everything that is not easily replaced, one at work and one at home. The 10mb or so that I need to save transfers fast enough over my cable modem that these "backups" can be done nightly. Everything else (OS, programs, settings, etc) are simple enough that I can reinstall everything in a few hours. Additionally, I burn my tax files onto a CD each year with the rest of these files and store it away in a fireproof safe. Sure it won't last through a major disaster, but then I think I'd have bigger things to worry about. :)

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  43. Now if there was one of these around... by w4rh0g · · Score: 1

    Well, to take the water/fire-proof safe a step further. How about placing a computer in the safe and have some sort of wireless setup. Then you would be able to have a backup of your info in a physically safe area. One problem that I can think of off the top of my head is how is the system going to get power to keep it running? How can we take this further?

    1. Re:Now if there was one of these around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A beawolf cluster of......oh nevermind...

  44. we use three backup sets by greechneb · · Score: 1

    We exchange weekly tapes with three other local businesses for storage in fireproof safes. It is highly unlikely that we would have a disaster that bad that all three businesses would be affected (barring nuclear holocaust - in which case, it won't be my problem) This all goes back to the multiple sites, multiple backup theory. Our daily tapes are stored in a fireproof safe here. So the most we could lose would be those daily tapes, and be forced to go back to a weekly tape from the previous week.

  45. freely available, redundant webcaching. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    To backup all of my important data, I like to post it to slashdot. That way, it'll be in the /. archives, and eventually cached on google somewhere.

    For instance:

    Grocery list:
    Milk
    eggs
    50 CD/R spindle

  46. Use Kazza to make backups.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pad your data into some porn movie and you will have loads of copies floated around the internet.

    1. Re:Use Kazza to make backups.. by waxmop · · Score: 1

      somebody modded this informative?

      now i know what's responsible for all the garbage in the signal.

    2. Re:Use Kazza to make backups.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, You're on to me! Who else would have thought steganography would be used for backups.

  47. Offsite Storage! by quick9vb · · Score: 1

    Once a week we send our backups to a secure offsite location. We chose a site that was built specifically for the purpose of data storage. It has safety measures to account for temperature, humidity, fire, hurricane, etc. We can have tapes delivered to us within one hour in case of an emergency.

  48. I'm surprised people have such attachment to data by JimmyBigFish · · Score: 1

    Even as I was reading the fire article the other day I was surprised at how critical people think their data is. So I asked myself, if my computer were to go up in flames, what would I REALLY ABSOLUTELY miss? The only thing I could think of is a spreadsheet that contains some account information I use. Other than that, what is so damn critical that I can't either re-create it or live without it? Your pr0n? It's still on the internet. If you lose the archive, that just means you get to start over!! And mp3's? Kazaa still exists. WinMX still exists, pick your favorite and start again. Or better yet, go listen to some live music and start anew. Sure, some corporations may have trouble but how many of you would really not be able to live without the computer or the data it contains? (crap, I think I just asked a karma suicide question here on /.)

  49. Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  50. some very important steps from by Archfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    someone whose been burned before. The media must be stored offsite in a dark temp. controlled vault, media deteriorates so long term backups must be re-written to NEW media every 12-24 months according to vendor specs, and if the data is important you need to keep MULTIPLE generations on NEW media, and periodically PERFORM A RESTORE to verify readability and the fact that you are actually capturing what you think you are. If you are a linux/unix environment you are blessed with ufsdump, otherwise welcome to 3rd party HELL. Aix even has a bootable recovery image...mksysb i think

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:some very important steps from by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      For the cheaply minded, generic safe deposit boxes at banks are a good start. They're usually pretty good about you coming in so often to pickup/dropoff stuff, and are (hopefully) pretty good about protecting them.

    2. Re:some very important steps from by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "...and periodically PERFORM A RESTORE to verify readability and the fact that you are actually capturing what you think you are."

      Absolutely right - one time, a client's business got broken into and all computers stolen. Fortunately, a cyclic zip disk backup was already implemented and all data was saved on those discs...

      ...except for this one admin assist whose very important accounting records were not on those discs. She saved them to separate floppies. But her box of floppies was bad.

      Turns out that nobody ever tested the integrity of the backed up data on those floppies! (And really, floppies are terrible for backup in the first place. They are too easily damaged.) It was pretty obivous to me that something was going wrong because the floppy drive made strange groaning noises when disks from that box were put into it, but with non-technical people such blindling obvious things simply don't occur to them.

      TEST YOUR DATA-BACKUP INTEGRITY!

    3. Re:some very important steps from by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      actually that is a really good idea, provided you don't need 24hr access to the data.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    4. Re:some very important steps from by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Speaking of floppies .. are they actually still being made, or are those sold new in fact old warehouse fodder? Reason I ask, I've noticed that *ALL* 3" floppy media started going back pretty much together as of a couple years ago. Now I'm hard-pressed to find a diskette that's 100% reliable even in the very short term (format disk, copy data, sneakernet to wherever, data is already corrupted!!)

      (One hates to burn a CD just for a single 1mb file!!)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:some very important steps from by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Speaking of floppies .. are they actually still being made, or are those sold new in fact old warehouse fodder? Reason I ask, I've noticed that *ALL* 3" floppy media started going back pretty much together as of a couple years ago."

      Floppies are still being made. I have seen 100 packs at costco. BUT the ones being made now are crappy. They only have glue on the corners to hold the two plastic halves together. Dust can get in the sides. The older floppies from times past are glued all the way around for longer life. Try to find OLD floppies!

      Also you might want to check out one of those USB memory key devices.

    6. Re:some very important steps from by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Actually, the ones at Costco are what I'm talking about. They bear a TDK label but they look suspiciously like old Verbatim or Fuji disks; that's why I wonder if they're actually of recent manufacture, or if they were rescued from the back of a warehouse and relabeled.

      The lack of glue all the way around is nothing new; it's always been so for cheaply-made disks (you shoulda seen the first ones from China!) But dust isn't really the issue. If it were, there wouldn't be a live 360k diskette left on the planet.

      The best floppies (and backup tapes in the QIC80 era) were always Sony, tho quality dropped somewhat when they went from grey box to blue box. (Apparently made in a different plant.)

      I've got *hundreds* of old floppies, from early single-sided 5" sloppies and 3" crispies. They've been going bad in consistent patterns:

      720k 3" went first, starting about 6-7 years ago, usually with total fails (bad track 0). 1.2mb 5" went next, tho usually just odd bad sectors. 1.44mb 3" as noted started going all in a bunch a couple years ago. And the huge majority of 360k 5" disks are still good, even tho some are now over 20 years old; however those few that fail become completely unreadable (diskette? WHAT diskette??)

      The REALLY scary thing is that I've used enough floppies over the years to see the patterns!! Someone should lock me up before I hurt myself. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  51. Iron Mountain by Gudlyf · · Score: 2

    We use Iron Mountain for an off-site location for storing our backup tapes, but they're pricey and certainly overkill for home backups.

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:Iron Mountain by kippy · · Score: 1

      I actually live nearby one of the Iron Mountain storage sites. Now I'm sure they are a reliable company and do a great job but the visual of the building is really funny.

      It looks like this old broken down wherehouse and it's just a few blocks from the west side chicago ghettos.

      maybe you have to see it but the visual of the Iron Mountain logo on what looks like a sheet-metal barn is pretty amusing.

  52. Make sure your backup methodology is good to start by Sheetrock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First, you have to make sure your backup method isn't prone to mistakes. One setup I had to clean up involved reusing the same three backup tapes for god knows how long (about one file in three was properly restorable) and was missing perhaps the three most important datafiles on the system because they happened to be in use during the backup and the guy that set it up didn't realize that was a problem.

    Right now, CD-Rs (not -RWs) seem to be a great way to store moderate amounts of data. -RWs suffer from degradation pretty quickly despite their rewriteability (I've never seen one live up to the '1000 writes' standard they claim -- more like 3-7). For larger amounts, DVD-R may be the wave of the future, but high-quality tapes are probably as good if you can persuade your boss to let you replace them from year to year.

    Periodically, it's important to store your backups offsite. A safe-deposit box works well, or perhaps a fireproof safe if you're worried about the confidentialness of your information. But yeah, I'd move that stuff offsite biweekly or monthly at a minimum.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  53. Triple threat... by mjphil · · Score: 1

    1) RAID 1 in my main system.
    2) Weekly online save of changes via email to Yahoo account.
    3) Monthly back-up to a removable HD I keep in the work data safe.

  54. try the freezer! by astroblue · · Score: 1

    I was advised that a good fire-safe place to keep my will is in the freezer next to the ice cream :) I wonder how CDR's deal with cold? I would guess its ok.

    1. Re:try the freezer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ice cream as too many Calories and will burn very hot! Come to think of it so does most of the things in my fridge.

    2. Re:try the freezer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CD's, including CD-R's, do fine in the freezer. In college, a friend had a cheap, generic Cyrix-based PC. The CD-ROM that came in it would only work for a few minutes at a time before it would overheat and turn off. The guy kept all his CD's in the freezer, because the drive would run for longer before overheating with a frozen CD in it. True story.

  55. Protecting my backups... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    I make backups of them of course.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  56. I keep a Plastic Jesus on the backup tape cabinet by ch-chuck · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So far it's been excellent protection against acts of God.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  57. eew... by EngMedic · · Score: 1

    The first thing going through my mind was the need to mail a set of recent backup discs to a family member...

    Amazing! The only /. reader who doesn't devote much of his harddrive to pr0n! (or maybe not.... eww.....)

    --
    filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
  58. I'm smart by grub · · Score: 3, Informative


    I keep all my MP3s backed up on Kazaa.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:I'm smart by matto14 · · Score: 0

      Hey isn't the Kaaza network great. I love putting my music, movie, p0rn files on other peoples computers so just in case my computer goes down(windoze x-pee.) It's really nice that others are so kind that they allow me to use their hard drives to archive my data. I just wish the Riaa mpaa would understand my dilemia. It's just not my fault, but for my backups this is my best solution.

      --
      SCREW FLANDERS
  59. 9-11 IT recovery tally? by peter303 · · Score: 2

    I presume the recovery after 9-11 was all over the board. Some companies did not have adequate backups of all their business records. While others, like the stock exchanges did fine.

    1. Re:9-11 IT recovery tally? by jafac · · Score: 2

      during the original WTC bombing, one of the companies I heard about had their offsite backups located in a building just across the mall. Since that area was off-limits for several days due to the hazards and the building inspectors checking things out, and the police gathering evidence, they could not access either their primary data OR their backups, so they had all their workers set up at a hot-site, temp offices, phones, equipment - and no data for several days.

      Something like 95% of businesses that had no disaster recovery plan failed within a year of the first bombing.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    2. Re:9-11 IT recovery tally? by mclancy10006 · · Score: 1
      One other thing is there was a major backup site location for one of the 'offsite' storage companies at WTC. Some folks who went through the trouble of sending data offiste had it destroyed as well.

      Don't forget the 6.5 mile away suggestion from one of the other posts.

      Offsite needs to be away from probable inclusions. In some places I've lived that might include a snow flake...

      Also the revovery mostly worked, but the markets were closed a for several days. IMHO because to many firms were in disarray with both technology and human resources. Nobody's DR scenarios prior to 9-11 anticipated losing mulitple facilities, communcations, transportation hubs, and personnel at the same time.

      They should now...

  60. Keeping backups offsite is a must by mcroydon · · Score: 1

    It's not always the most practical thing to do, but keeping your backups offsite is probably the only way of avoiding problems like this.

    You can always have a machine colocated in a seperate facility mirroring or backing up your data, depending on security level, etc. When you mail backup tapes, you're always at the mercy of UPS/FedEx/USPS or your local mail carrier

    --
    6.02x10^23, baby!
  61. Store them in space by Ryu2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously. If privatization of space continues to grow, and launches become more afforadable, I'm predicting we may see businesses offering to launch your media into space, where the only thing that will destroy your data is the occassional asteroid collision.

    Might still be too expensive for the individual, but I can surely see a large multinational corporation thinking about this.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:Store them in space by Psiolent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about recovery? That'd be an interesting scenario.

    2. Re:Store them in space by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      Seriously. If privatization of space continues to grow, and launches become more afforadable, I'm predicting we may see businesses offering to launch your media into space, where the only thing that will destroy your data is the occassional asteroid collision.

      The problem with, say, backing up to a satellite full of drives (or even just launching a box of tapes or CDs) is that most media will degrade quite quickly in space. You're bathed in enough ionizing radiation to make electronics go funny every few minutes to every few weeks, and that's when there *isn't* a solar flare going on. Magnetic and optical media are more resistant to radiation, but are far from immune. Think of this as being put under an airport x-ray machine for as long as it's up there.

      Multiple earth-based sites gives much better reliability.

    3. Re:Store them in space by Ryu2 · · Score: 2

      Before the advent of digital imagery, photorecon sats routinely ejected film canisters which were then recovered on Earth. It's a tried and true method.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    4. Re:Store them in space by ek_adam · · Score: 2

      Cosmic rays, solar flares, Van Allen Belts...

  62. One Word: Removable Hard Disk Drive(s)! by thecampbeln · · Score: 1
    Wait... 1, 2, 3...

    Anyway, I use removable HDDs for my network backup. I've got a little utility (Idem, shitty but it does what it needs to do) that is configured to make backups of the essential folders on my Win2k box:

    • Desktop (My Current Working Files)
    • My Documents (My Files)
    • Favorites (My Net Links)
    • SendTo (Cause I Have This Nicely Configured)
    • Start Menu (So I Know What I HAD Installed)
    • C:\~temp (My Personal Temp Dir)


    This plus a little diligence in keeping all of my important files within this subset (including making local backups of program configuration files under 'My Docs') makes for a great backup strategy for me.

    Then every Friday I switch the current backup rHDD with the one offsite. This way I have a current backup and a 'week ago' copy. So if I need an older version (though not more then a week older) or if my house is lost I've got my data that is no more then a week old.

    I figure if both my home and the offsite location go down in flames (or what have you), I've got bigger problems to worry about.

    --
    "1984" was ment to be a warning, not a guidebook. You hear that Kim Jong-il!? BushCo?!
  63. Protecting the tapes: by foo+fighter · · Score: 2

    Get a $30-$50 home safe to keep onsite backups in. Most are fireproof for about 45 minutes. They are usually also waterproof. I don't know how well they'd stand up to your house colapsing on them.

    Get a safe deposit box at your bank to keep offsite backups in. Most banks offer these to their members for free or a reasonable rate -- much cheaper than mailing tapes or disks. I keep my monthly backups there. Once a month rides the line between "current enough" and "so often it's annoying so I don't do it like I should".

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
  64. Why physical backup-tapes? by redhog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why do o many people use physical back-up-tapes, so that it is boring and time-consuming, and so that they don't back-up that often, which they store near the computer, so that they all can burn at the same time, when they could make a cron-job that rsyncs their data to some remote site(s) (and yes, rsync, _not_ scp or something, that would take a hell lot of bandwidth)?

    I back-up my system that way (it's about 10Gb), over a 1Mbit link. At the moment I just back it up that way to one remote site (about 5km away), but soon, I will probably back it up to one more site (about 2km away).

    This is much safer (as it is done more often), and much easier (as it is fully automatic) that tapes or CDs or whatnot.

    --
    --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    1. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Because network bandwidth is expensive for a home user. What are you going to do when your broadband provider puts a 2GB/month limit on your account and your backups start failing after the first week? The only reason this works now is because broadband providers still have competition (although they're slowly buying it all up) and neither side wants to introduce bandwidth caps (that users find distasteful, even if they aren't hitting them) and drive away their customer base.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by PD · · Score: 4, Informative

      Better than rsync:

      unison - I keep my desktop, server, and laptop synchronized over SSL connections. Like rsync, it sends minimal changes to keep source trees up to date. I can sync over a gig in my home directories in much less than a minute unless I dumped a whole bunch of new stuff on there.

      http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/

    3. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by mosch · · Score: 2
      i actually do rsync some of my data off to a colo'd server, but that's not a backup.

      you see, the problem with rsync is you don't have any versioning. If I overwrite a file, then perform my backup, then realize that I overwrote that file, I'm fucked. I can't pull yesterday's rsync, or last week's rsync.

    4. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Because there's piece-of-mind with a physical backup.

      What if the next great virus/worm/trojan wipes out not only your PC, but all of your remote sites. Perhaps even piggybacking on your rsync job.

      It's not going to spread to last weeks tape sitting in a bank vault (or where have you).

      Your solution doesn't cover the worst-case-scenario. The whole point is a catastrophe-proof backup system.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by Dialithis · · Score: 1

      Thats why you use rdiff-backup, which lets you pull up "yesterday's rsync". It is actually a quite nice system that does reverse diffs on the data, over a SSH connection by default.

    6. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by redhog · · Score: 1

      That's why you use rsync, then you transfer just the changes and some md5-sums or whatever... At least, I don't change for more than ome MBs per week...

      --
      --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    7. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      I use incremental dumps and my daily dump size from yesterday was: 1,560MB. Now I'm into digital fansubs so this number is inflated, but it should show how easy it is to blow through the bits once you start doing interesting things.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  65. where are my mod points when I need them... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    mod parent up: a while ago I was thinking about getting a fireproof safe for my own backups, but fireproof (as defined by manufacturers) doesn't really mean 'compatible with magnetic media', since an inside temperature that doesn't make paper burn and/or plastic liquefy, is still a temperature that will probably cook your cdr dye and/or play havoc with other magnetic media.

    I found that there were safes that were guaranteed to keep the inside at a temperature compatible with storage media, but their prices were not as affordable (obviously).

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful
      since an inside temperature that doesn't make paper burn and/or plastic liquefy, is still a temperature that will probably cook your cdr dye and/or play havoc with other magnetic media.

      Not to mention that the walls of fireproof safes are usually filled with moisture-retaining material. That helps with fires, but the humidity inside the safe is always high. Over time, that could degrade the plastic and metal parts of any digital media stored inside even without a fire.

    2. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well, if you buy a good small one, spending about $150 or more, it will protect from fires for about 2 hours. They are rated in the sales literature. It will ensure that your media inside stays within the adequate temperature range for a total of 2 hours while it is in the fire. If it is in the fire for longer than 2 hours, then you will have problems. Since most fires burn for less than 2 hours, you can rest assured that your data is safe using one of these devices.

    3. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by hyperizer · · Score: 1

      And many fireproof safes are designed to melt shut in a fire, suggesting that perhaps they wouldn't keep plastic contents from melting as well.

    4. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by elvum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure that follows - if it were the outside of the safe that melted shut, it needn't be the case that the inside melt too...

    5. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by sphealey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      mod parent up: a while ago I was thinking about getting a fireproof safe for my own backups, but fireproof (as defined by manufacturers) doesn't really mean 'compatible with magnetic media', since an inside temperature that doesn't make paper burn and/or plastic liquefy, is still a temperature that will probably cook your cdr dye and/or play havoc with other magnetic media.
      There are various types and quality levels of fire resistant (not fire "proof") safes. Different types are required for paper vs. magnetic media (the ones for paper have a moisture-containing material in the walls that releases the moisture above a certain temperature, preventing paper from turning into dust as it heats up). And while the $75 ones from Wal-Mart are better than nothing, commercial quality safes with most of the gotchas engineered out usually start around $500.

      However, an on-site fire resistant safe is just a starting point. I am sure there were lots of them in the WTC towers and they didn't help much.

      sPh

    6. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by hyperizer · · Score: 1

      Well, the important point is to get one that's specifically rated to protect media.

    7. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by ebh · · Score: 1

      If I have a fire in my house that's hot enough to melt aluminum[1], I'm going to lose a lot more than data. For protection against that sort of inferno, off-site backups are your only hope (we keep ours in a safe-deposit box at the bank alongside our critical documents, savings bonds, etc.).

      [1] Some videos of the WTC fire showed molten metal dripping out the floors of one tower where the plane hit. It is believed that the metal was aluminum from the fuselage of the plane itself.

    8. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by nakaduct · · Score: 2
      fireproof (as defined by manufacturers) doesn't really mean 'compatible with magnetic media', ... [those that are] were not as affordable


      This is not consistent with reality. A "fireproof" safe is one that delays heat transfer across its walls. Actual fireproofedness is, of course, not possible.

      If media fails at temps of (say) 250F, and you buy a safe that can keep temps below 450F for one hour, then that safe will keep temps below 250F for 1 hour, minus X. If you upgrade to a four-hour safe, then you're good for 4 hours minus Y ( > 1hr - X ). Heat transfer is a well-understood phenomenon; you can approximate X or Y, given reasonable values for inner temperature, burning-room temperature, some graph paper and a physics book.

      You don't need a "data-grade" safe. Buy a regular paper-grade safe, with a rating of however long you need, plus a cushion.
    9. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      The fire may burn for less than 2 hours but the safe itself will retain the heat for much longer.
      When a local bank burned, the safe was safe (pun intended) but couldn't be opened for more than 24 hours. If it had been opened before it cooled to a safe temperature, the contents would have ignited with the combination of residual heat and oxygen.
      Could any media tolerate this type of sustained exposure? No, our daily backups were in there and they were "Toast".

    10. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by p_trinli · · Score: 1

      You should also thing about size and weight for these safes. The UNIX team stores weekly, differential backups of campus data in safes. One time, we had to haul a safe down stairs--it took three men to do it! This wasn't a big sucker either; maybe a bit bigger than a shoebox. For all its heft, the unit only stored a few tapes. When you consider buying one, remember that the walls of the thing are going to be very thick, and that'll eat up space within.

    11. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that hard to melt aluminum. I did it with a paper fire...trying to burn plastic off an aluminum pot. Got a nice shiny blob paperweight.

  66. I don't know about your home network, but... by craenor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I lost my home network in a fire, the data is the last thing I'd worry about losing. But assuming I still have a house and a network to use my data with...I would just skip backups and go with full reinstall/recreate, more fun that way.

    1. Re:I don't know about your home network, but... by Lxy · · Score: 2

      data is the last thing I'd worry about losing

      Why? Home insurance covers hardware. Cat5, switches, PCs, even your house itself... you can buy that with insurance money. For $40/mo, my home is covered. If it gets firebombed by the tree in the backyard when we're not home, what have i really lost? That's right, ANYTHING MONEY CAN'T BUY. Pictures, sentimental gifts, and oh yeah, MY DATA. hard drives are cheap, building a backup server is cheap too. All you need is an old pentium or better, a 10/100 NIC, and some big drives. I have a pair of 80GB drives. I have a 40 in my box and a 20 in my wife's. The box is set up as a Samba share, and cron does it all automatically. Every night at 1 AM, it connects and does diff backups on our boxen. Once a week, it does a full, and on Monday I swap drives in my drawer here at work. It cost me about $200 to make (it was awhile ago), a couple hours to build, and zero effort to maintain.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
  67. pr0n!!!! by forged · · Score: 5, Funny
    no one cares about pr0n anyway ... or do they?

    You're new around here, aren't you?

    1. Re:pr0n!!!! by dildatron · · Score: 2

      Actually, I have found that pr0n is so accessable nowadays, that I don't bother saving my video collections when I want to reformat everything.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
  68. Fireproof safes are not good enough by buss_error · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Tempatures in fire proof safes will rise enough to destroy media. Unless the safe is rates MEDIA fireproof (or some such, I foget) it won't be enough to have usable backups after a fire.

    A good alternitave is to put your backups in a safe in the back yard.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    1. Re:Fireproof safes are not good enough by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      >> A good alternitave is to put your backups in a safe in the back yard

      Thats... OUTSIDE!

      If /.'ers were willing to go outside, they might have heard of something called a safety deposit box, available at the local bank, which can be insured.

      Nothing is 100% fail-safe, really. The nuclear explosion that wipes out your PC will probably wipe out your bank, the safe in the backyard.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  69. Affordable and Safe Data Protection Practices? by jki · · Score: 2

    scp * account@somewhere.else.than.your.neighborhood.

  70. Re:Fireproof safes... get a media safe by ip_vjl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Years ago I did web work for Sentry (a company that makes fireproof safes). They have a "media safe" specifically for computer media.

    From their description:

    While paper chars at 450 F (232 C), damage to computer media can occur at temperatures as low as 125 F (52 C). The interior of a Fire-Safe Media Chest or File remains well below this damage level during an average fire.


    If I remember correctly, they're only rated to keep the temperature in a safe range for about 30 or 60 minutes - hopefully enough for the firefighters to have done their work.

    One thing about the fire safes - make sure to keep them locked. A lot of people don't think of this, because they're only worried about fire, not theft - but if the floor/table they're sitting on gives way and they drop and the door pops open, it doesn't really matter how good the container is at resisting fire.

  71. Backups are Easy by sjlutz · · Score: 1

    I just burn all my MP3's to CD and give them to my friends to hold for safekeeping... they keep calling them Mix CD's for some reason. And don't get me started about my porn collection..

  72. That's what a colo machine and friends are for by danlyke · · Score: 1

    I just set up a cron job that copies newly changed files and database records to (and from) my colo box, and the colo box is several thousand miles away. If you haven't got a colo machine, see if a friend will share resources with you. In these days of DSL and cable modem, finding a way to get copies of your files off-site is fairly easy. "find" with its various "-*newer" options and "touch" make this rather easy.

    You might want to use a safe deposit box for the keys you encrypt those files with, but geographically disparate repositories done automatically works for me.

  73. Avoid sabotage by PacoSuarez · · Score: 1

    Make three copies. Store two of them in anti-fire cabinets in separate buildings. Store the third one in an undisclosed location, to make sabotage difficult.

    This has been used in Michelin for a long time.

  74. backups by maxbang · · Score: 1

    I use my Speak 'n' Spell unit to ftp into Stephen Hawking's wetwired cybernetic chair implant. It is an extension of the calculating universe model.

    -----

    I also reply beneath your current threshold.
    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
  75. 2 servers? Use rsync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I rsync over ssh home to office and office to home. The two sites are about 30km apart, so that should be fine. HDDs are cheaper and faster than any other method.

  76. I back up my data... by Hilleh · · Score: 1

    I back up my data by burning it to CD-R's and then using magnets to put them up on the refrigerator so I'll always know where it is! I haven't had to recover yet, but I'm satisfied knowing that if I ever loose my countless valuable configuration files and documents they will be right there to avert a catastrophe that otherwise would have cost me easily 100 hours of work!

  77. Like many others by krray · · Score: 1

    I backup my data @ work to go home and my data @ home to go to work. It's always in my hands (or the car) too.

    A RAID-1 Linux system with a couple of 120G 'el cheapo IDE hard drives can do a lot of damage... :)

    Of course with all my data here and there with me in-between I rarely know where the hell I am.

  78. Thesis backup by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 2

    When I was in the final stages of writing my thesis, I had backups on ZIP disks:

    One set in the same room as my computer - generally a day or two old.
    One set in another room in the house - a bit older.
    One set in another house in the same city.
    One set (a few weeks old) in my brother's house about 500 km away.

    This gave me a good lifeline to sanity when I accidentally deleted my partition table a week before finishing. (In fact, I didn't need the backup - I had the partition table info in hardcopy and just reentered it.)

    Now I use my computer mostly for games, so my only backup is that my parents have copies of all my photos.

    "Paranoia is good".

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  79. infect your machines with nimda by migstradamus · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about all the people who used the "Nimda Distributed Backup Plan"? Infect all your machines with Nimda and let it send your files out to dozens of people around the world on a regular basis.

  80. Cowboy Neal... by clandaith · · Score: 0

    handles all my backups!

    Oops, thought this was a poll.

  81. "Affordable, Safe" - Pick one. by Alex · · Score: 1

    Thats about it,

    Alex

  82. The Safe Bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just stack all my 3.5" floppies on my 21" monitor so I can run out with my data in a hurry. I also store all my CDs face up in the greenhouse outside so I can't miss them in the bright sun.

  83. My backups. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I backup all my pr0n to /dev/null. It never fills, never needs a change of media, and is amazingly fast. I rest assured that my pr0n will be of the same quality coming from /dev/null that it was going into it.

  84. Priorities by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2


    How about having a plan to saving your family and yourself incase of fire?

    Really who cares about your email's you sent out announcing a party in the long run?

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  85. How About by Apparition-X · · Score: 1

    A Cicero 8.1 GB PC card drive? Its tough to get more portable than that, and that ought to be enough to accommodate most home users data that can't be easily replicated (apps, mp3 burned from cd). Failing that, a 40-80 GB USB 2.0 external drive is certainly cheap enough to be practical. Or, depending on your OS, and the level of firewall protection, and free space, how about using a native backup tool and ftp'ing the image to an alternate place (i.e. work...!) DVD doesn't appeal to me just because of the expense of the drive, but blue-ray (27 GB devices) could definitely change my mind if they were sub $200. Thats a bunch of thoughts, there ought to be something there that can satisfy your requirements. Unless of course you have 200+ GB, in which case there is no way to do it fast or cheap... get a tape drive, and try to be a little bit discriminating in what you back up.

  86. As linus torvolds said by anonymous+coword · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Real men don't need backups, just upload your your files to an ftp server and let everyone else mirror it.

  87. Simple and handy by DysonSphere · · Score: 0

    I backup to floppies, and stick them to the
    cabinet with a magnet.

    --
    Mommy. What's a karma whore?
  88. my backups? by Maskirovka · · Score: 2

    What do I do with my backups? I upload them to "backup servers", and in exchange for the service, I backup the server admins stuff from the backup servers. With a little bit of time and effort, and if you have good stuff to back up, you can have it mirrored at hundreds of hotsites all over the globe, making it virtually indistructable!

  89. burn cd, duplicate cd, store in safety deposit box by stephdau · · Score: 1


    Personally, I burn my backups to cd. Then, I duplicate the cd(s), and store one copy in my safety deposit box at my bank. I figure that if they can protect their oh so beloved money, my cds are most likely to be safe there. - stephane

  90. The ultimate in safe backups... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1
    Write your data to an IBM 75GXP and then just try to get the data off... neither fire nor flood will be able to steal your data!! Thanks IBM!!

    Ordinary restores could be a real pain though.

  91. A decent and affordable backup system by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok here's what I do for my small (about 12 persons) company:

    You need two server machines, one to be the primary server, and one to hold a backup drive. (having the primary and backup drives on seperate machines prevents total loss through several faliure modes right off the bat, like a power supply malfunction on one machine)

    These machines can be affordable and inexpensive Pentium II or III machines.

    For this example, I'll tell you exactly what I used.

    I went to newegg.com and bought three identical hard drives, 80 GB maxtors. I also purchased a lian-li removable IDE hard drive bay plus an extra cartridge for it.

    I put one of the maxtors in the primary server machine, and made it the primary drive.

    I put the other two maxtors in lian-li removable carts, and labeled them Backup drive A and Backup Drive B.

    I put backup drive A in the lian li bay on the backup computer.

    On the primary server, I made two tasks with windows task scheduler:

    The first task does a full backup every monday night to the backup drive over the network.

    The second task does a nightly incremental backup, on every night of the week except monday night.

    When I come in on Monday morning, I remove the current backup drive, take it down to our safe deposit box at our bank, and swap it for the other drive, which has been sitting there for a week. in the evening, task scheduler runs a full backup on the drive.

    So at all times, there is at least a week of incremental backups in case a deleted file needs to be retrieved, and there is an offsite backup that is never more than a week old, and there are nightly incremental backups on-site. All you have to do is swap the drives once a week and take them to your favorite off-site location for storage.

    I've been doing this for a few months now and it's been good. I also put the server and backup machine on UPS, and the primary server has control of it through USB, and shuts itself down before the power dies.

    --Mike

    1. Re:A decent and affordable backup system by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

      I should also note that if your primary server is a RAID, you can still use one drive for backup. If I had two 80GB drives in a RAID0 array on the primary, I'd use one 160GB drive as the backup, since the backup drive doesn't need to be fast. That way you can still do the drive swappy thingy without handling multiple drives.

      When you get to RAID sizes that exceed the size of the largest single drive currently available, this system no longer works.

    2. Re:A decent and affordable backup system by puto · · Score: 2

      Hey Phantom,

      I do something similar on my home lan. And am actually implementing it at a clients site next month.

      I have 2 80 gig external USB/FIRE drives. They are connected to my home lan via a USB 2.0 port(i got the firewirewire addy as well so I could zap on with the old ladies ibook, she thinks i married her for her looks).

      Anyway on a 2000 box it hits my linux box, a 2000 server box, pro box, and an xp box. Using the built in backup. Backups up my data at 400 kbps.

      Every morning I unmount one drivc, and plug in the either. The drives are identical(cloned directory structure).

      So I have a full back up daily without too much trouble. I will probably go to a Mon/Wed/Fri thing. And I always leave one at the office over the weekend.

      I still burn stuff but this makes it easy and is an added sleep well measurement for me.

      The drives are from www.zeehoo.com three year warranty and dirty cheap. I paid 141 dollars each. They come in a cool case with its own cooling, and it looks neat as well.

      PUTO

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  92. Take your backup media to work with you.... by gatkinso · · Score: 2

    ...there you go.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  93. Use the Net by nautical9 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    With broadband being so popular, all you need is a family member/friend who also has it, and write a little script to zip up and ftp/scp the backup file to their computer. They do the same to you - should a fire break out, it's doubtful both of you will be affected. If it is a concern, just add more people in the "ring".

    No need for big backup tape drives or burners, and no hassle once you have it up and running. (Of course, the usual "test your backups" mantra still applies - no sense backing things up if you're not doing it right).

    You can also use a dynamic DNS service and client apps so you don't have to constantly updating IP addresses when the ISPs change them.

  94. easy solution by cmckay · · Score: 2

    Just mail your backup CDs to me. I need some more frisbees.

  95. Backup by AyeFly · · Score: 1

    I just make backups of my backup data. with enough copies, you are bound to find one laying around somewhere...under the bed, in your car, on the fireplace, etc...

    --
    Sig- http://www.dreamhost.com/rewards.cgi?ayefly
  96. VPN With Friends by Myriad · · Score: 2
    Having recently been considering this problem for home use I came up with this idea:

    Create a VPN with a series of trusted friends. Each person 'donates' a few hundred megs to the project.

    Critical data can then be PGP encrypted and stored on the virtual network drives manually or by backup software. This way no one can tamper with the archives.

    This works for me as I'm mostly concerned with backing up source code. It's useless for backing up digital video, but I usually don't worry about those assets too much after a given project has been completed.

    Won't work for everyone, but I think it's handy. Oh, and backup your PGP keys and keep them in a safety deposite box or something... otherwise you'll really be screwed.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  97. Just use Kazaa by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2

    Encrypt your files and name them something like "Hot Goat Sex", and share them on Kazaa/Gnutella/eDonkey/etc. Then, when you lose your data, you just go cruising the the net for your files again! The only problem will be sorting out your files from the real goatse.cx files!

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Just use Kazaa by devmike · · Score: 1

      This isn't really a bad idea.

      After doing a lot of reading of the theory of P2P as a legitimate process in computing, I've come up with a plan:

      Some enterprising programmer should consider writing a P2P program that lets each client system create a unique backup that every other client has a piece of, like a big worldwide RAID 5 or something. Given the ratio of (non-application stuff) data to drive space, this might work.

    2. Re:Just use Kazaa by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2

      You might want to check out FreeNet then.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  98. my strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bring work backup tapes home and home backup tapes to work. A set of each occasionally go to a safe deposit box. (i am pretty lazy about it)

  99. offsite backup by kcroke · · Score: 1

    There are services that will store your data offsite. Some are expensive, some are not. I have been planning on setting up an FTP server at work and have my data go there.

    As long as the data is on my work machine and home machine, something would have to go wrong at each machine for me to have a problem.

    Also, the process will be automated so I don't have to remember to back-up.

  100. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Casca · · Score: 2

    For smaller amounts of data, like key documents, quicken files, and the sort, online backup could work. I just archive my most important files, compress/encrypt them, and then regularly ftp the files up to my ISP. This wouldn't work too well for an MP3 collection or anything, but for the stuff you REALLY need to be able to access, it can be a lifesaver. One of the nice benefits of uploading it to an ISP account, is that you can then reach it from anywhere in the world that you have access to the net.

    I know it may not be the most secure method, but I am willing to accept the risk of someone being willing and able to hack the ecryption on my files.

    --
    Casca
  101. Storing Data Remotely is What I Do by Shackleford · · Score: 1
    I keep some data stored on different servers located in different locations. So something I'd have to suggest is use of one of the services that offer free storage space. Here is a list of sites that offer these services. So in the event of fire or some similar event, you can have data stored in many different locations. Also, I believe that not only can you store this data remotely, you can store it securely in at least a few of these locations.

    Of course, it's always a good idea to keep backups stored on rewritable CDs, since they can store more data. But having data stored in many remote locations would be a good idea if you want to ensure that your data is safe from disasters. I'd say that the more backups you have, and the more different locations they are stored in, the better.

  102. coasters and free windowscd based backup software! by Flamesplash · · Score: 2

    I use my backup cd's as coaster, then I don't have to worry about people stealing them.

    The question I really want answered is, what is a good free windows backup program that does incremental backups to any cd burner? I found one once, but it required I have easy cd creator, which is $100 alone. I have Nero, paid for it any everything, but I can't find anything to serve me.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  103. The internet is my backup solution by pknoll · · Score: 1
    I don't keep any volatile data. Email I discard almost immediately, after I've dealt with it. Software I can always get from CVS somewhere, and I can save my own code there, too.

    Documentation of projects I'm working on for employers etc. is on their disks, and so not my problem.

    All my financial records are at my accountant's offices; again, usually not my problem.

    About the only data I have on my personal computers worth saving are my .*rc, config files and so forth, and game saves, which really aren't all that important.

  104. Cheap, Distributed small storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Super-compress your small important stuff and send it to like yahoo.com mail account you own with an expanded 100MB mailbox. You can parasiticly use their implicit distributed backups
    (all over the nation?) to take care of your data. These technique has a cost of some security comforts though.

  105. Half the battle by joebagodonuts · · Score: 1

    Backups don't do you any good if you can't restore the data in the event of an emergency. I constantly run up against this at work. People are constanly focused on backups, but when I ask questions about restores, I get blank looks and a mumbled "I dunno". You can backup as often as you like, but until you have tested and proved that you can recover, it is a waste of effort IMO. It amazes me that people can be so short-sighted. Oh well, it helps to keep me working :-)

    I store my data at work, but more importantly I know I can recover.

    --
    "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
  106. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    I've rewritten CD-RW with no degredation hundreds of times. Well, at least dozens. Not even the expensive ones, the moderately priced Digital Research branded ones at CompUSA.

    I would use it to archive my projects at work and take home every night, and back in again the next morn, until the powers that be finally allowed me to setup a VPN for myself.

    The key is to handle them extra gingerly.. Move them from the case to the drive quickly, and take extra caution not to get any shmutz or fingerprints on the back of them.

    Oh, and burn slow. The longer the laser stays focused on a given point on the disc, the more clearly its going to 'burn' it. (Makes sense to me at least, though I'm sure some try-hard jackass will jump in with some idiotic chemistry lesson about why I'm wrong.)

    All the same, while they make for good short-term or incremental backups, a one-time write on a *quality, branded* media is the best for archival.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  107. The paranoid's method by swb · · Score: 3, Funny

    1) Create false identity

    2) Buy plot of land in extremely rural area close to Canadian border. Use false identity, pay cash.

    3) Build small, subterranean concrete bunker (10' x 10'). Install water-tight safe in bunker. Camouflage bunker, make it tamper-evident.

    4) Visit with data periodically.

    You now have a safe place to store things. Safe from fire, flood, and most importantly from the government. Since you bought the land with false identification, they can't shake you down for what you have stored there, unless they know about it. It's close to the border, so you should be able to get the contents fairly easily from the other side of the border -- or get the data as you go OVER the border.

    OK, so its not convenient and illegal, but hasn't true safety and privacy always been that way?

    1. Re:The paranoid's method by cjpez · · Score: 2
      OK, so its not convenient and illegal, but hasn't true safety and privacy always been that way?
      Is assuming an alternate identity illegal? I was under the impression that, so long as you're not doing anything illegal, you can use whatever name you feel like. Obviously there'll be some problems using things like credit cards, getting accounts at banks, and all that stuff, but if you're just paying cash for some land, it may not be that big of a deal.

      Then again, I could be wrong. "I heard it from this guy, see?" :P

    2. Re:The paranoid's method by Tassach · · Score: 2

      At least in most places, assuming another name is legal so long as the intent is not to defraud. I can call myself Princess Anastasia if I really want to; but if run up debts under that name, I'm still legally responsible to pay them -- I can't try and say that it wasn't me, it was that other person. I can call my self George W. Bush if I want to, but I can't walk into the bank and make a withdrawl from Curious George's bribe^H^H^H^H^Hcampaign contribution account

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    3. Re:The paranoid's method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious-Sir Oscar Wilde.

    4. Re:The paranoid's method by swb · · Score: 2

      Well, my "storage technique" is deliberately designed to falsify ownership of property. To own property you have to do a bunch of government paperwork to update the county land rolls, tax rolls, etc. Deliberately lying on those forms has GOT to be illegal.

      The biggest downside would be the suspicion that would come from the locals. "Who's this guy and why did he buy a parcel of land that's just a bunch of woods"?

    5. Re:The paranoid's method by spacefrog · · Score: 2

      5) ???

      6) PROFIT!

    6. Re:The paranoid's method by cjpez · · Score: 2
      To own property you have to do a bunch of government paperwork to update the county land rolls, tax rolls, etc.
      Ah, yeah . . . When you said "pay with cash" I guess my brain immediately leapt to the conclusion that there wasn't any paperwork to be done, either. Hm.
  108. CD-Rs suck, here is why by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most CD-Rs data material (not CD-RWs), especially cheap ones, are made from a substance that does break down over time. Its like 20-50 years or something, but if you are interested in LONG term storage, CD-Rs are not the way to go.

    I contract for customers that need long term storage and they usually go for either microfilm or optical disk. Optical disks are made of glass and they can survive all but the hottest fires. That would be what I would recommend for the article poster... (they're up to 10gigs a disk so far)

    1. Re:CD-Rs suck, here is why by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, with good PhthaloCyanine discs can last in the hundreds of years. Exposure to UV light of course weakens the reflective layer, as well as the plastic it's stuck in, but so long as you keep them in the case and stored somewhere safely, it's cheap, effective long time storage.

      Microfilms will break down over time too, much by way of the same factors as a CD-R would, for much the same reasons.

      Realistically, in 50 years, if you still needed the data, you'd be moving it onto some sort of super-cybernetic-solid-state-bio-petabyte-storage- device.

      An optical disk lasting 1000 years is all fine and good, but if there's no drive that can read it, it'd just be an obscure relic sitting in a museum somewhere.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:CD-Rs suck, here is why by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Insightful
      An optical disk lasting 1000 years is all fine and good, but if there's no drive that can read it, it'd just be an obscure relic sitting in a museum somewhere.


      Agreed, thats why the hardware upgrades must be factored into the total cost of storage for the life of the information. I can still go get a drive for a disk that was created 20 years ago, if you upgrade your stuff every 5 years or so you will not have this problem
  109. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Informative
    "(I've never seen one live up to the '1000 writes' standard they claim -- more like 3-7)"

    Use good media and use good burners. I'm using Verbatim 4x-10X CD-Rw high speed discs with a top-of-the-line Plextor 40x12x40 drive and the most commonly written one is up to about 20 writes with no loss of data integrity.

    And when the backup really matters, burn at the minimum speed. This will also reduce the chance of loss of data integrity.

  110. keep them with you by jzs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I keep my home backups in my Franklin planner, which is always with me. Keeping backups in a safe deposit box or other hard-to-reach location is guaranteed to fail, as it's too hard to stop by the bank daily. Eventually, I think those USB key rings will be the way to go when their storage capacity increases. You keep your wallet and credit cards safe by keeping them on your body, so why not keep your data on your person too?

  111. A few good practices.. by xchino · · Score: 2, Informative

    Always backup to at least one off site resource, whether it's taking a burnt cd home with you or simultaneously scp'ing data across a corporate WAN to several locations.

    If your data is absolute mission critical, consider investing in some sort of solid state media for backup, as it is normally more reliable than magnetic media.

    But the most important advice I could give to anyone would be..

    NEVER EVER TRUST A FLOPPY

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
  112. Hosting Companies by futuresheep · · Score: 2

    I use a hosting company that gives me 500MB of space for $14.95 per month. Gives me space plenty of space to wget things back and forth with, and someone else that will handle doing tape backups.

  113. Low Tech by milesbparty · · Score: 1

    I use a piece of paper and a pencil to copy down all the 0's and 1's

    --
    eMelody Web Directory add your site today!
  114. Work it out by huckamania · · Score: 1
    Take them to work. Put them in a drawer. If you need them you can bring them home with you at night or enjoy your commute with no traffic, though YMMV.

  115. Broadcast by msheppard · · Score: 3, Funny

    I periodically broadcast all my data to Vega. That way, if I ever have a catastrophic destruction of all the data, I only need to send a faster than light ship towards Vega far enough to recieve the last broadcast. If someone ever gets a sleeping virus into the system... I just send the ship a little futher and get an older backup.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  116. Backup Documentation by Ransak · · Score: 1

    One thing that is overlooked alot when creating a network/server backup strategy is documentation of the process.

    Almost every backup plan revolves around two or three key people knowing where exsisting offsite backups/SAN data structures are (and what to do with them), but what happens if those two or three people were caught in the fire that destroyed the facility to begin with?

    It's something that I've seen overlooked time and time again, but the potential loss of key people could cripple a company moreso than a server room going up in flames. It's something to think about, and can be compensated for by developing detailed documentation within your catastropic failure backup plan to compensate.

    --
    "Powers. I have them."
  117. mirrors? by Jumperalex · · Score: 1

    The problem I see with things like safety deposit boxes etc are the hassle of actually getting the there etc. Assuming things haven't changed since I had to worry about backing up large amounts of data, the accepted practices were things like weekly full, daily incrementals etc. Well the question then becomes efficiently and easily getting the data offsite on that scedule.

    So what about mirrors? This even sounds like a biz opportunity. If you trust your data in a bank safety deposit box, why not built physical safety deposit boxes that are conneted to the internet that you can VPN into. You can choose your own encryption, or none, allow others to also mirror data there.

    The actual specifics can depend on the exact needs. Maybe a box big enough for a PC that you build and put in there. Plugged into the "banks" supplied power to include power conditioning and UPS back up. Or just a server in a bank safe that is connected to hard drives actually in a safety deposit box. Make them hot swap-able so you could walk in there and remove the HD your self, just like your jewlery.

    Or how about wirelessly creating mirrors at neigbors houses with the distance determined by the likelyhood of a distaster actually taking both out. Just put high gain antennas up on the roofs for good distance.

    the final part of course being the need for some level of liability insurance. The nice part about that is the insurance company might just be motivated to occasionally audit the company to ensure they are using best practices for data assurance both in the physical and electronic realm. Afterall it is the Ins Co that would have to pay out for loss. There would of course have to be some good logging of traffic to ensure a user doesnt croak their data on purpose to collect on the claim.

    Finally for a small collective of friends around the country you could of course all set ftp servers on your machines where each person has their own share of a specifica data drive (to avoid problems when the OS has to be hacked on) and then you could even do a form of riading so that the data is spread amounst all the drives so that if any one drive goes out then all data isn't lost. With enough redundancy you could even lose a drive and lose no data.

    --
    If you can't be good, be good at it!
  118. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    o|t-s- - -s-t- - s.o
    |f G O D ||
    t |t H A T E S ||
    ss| F A G S ||
    || _ _ _ _ o _ _ ||
    t ' - o -s. t -t- -s'
    t s| | o _|/
    o s s | |s t" ".
    oo f | f /(o)-(o)\
    t s /_)fo f /s |
    f o s |s)|s '- o
    t \_o|\ '.o_s.' / |\/ft
    o f | |f\ \_/ / _|so'/
    o t f|_|\ f.t__s/ \f) /
    f t t \ \_/\_o/\__ o|s=|
    fft \ f /\ s\ `\ | |
    o s f \ \\o/ s \| |
    s st `\ /\ | o/ |
    ; || f |\____/
    t s o |fs|| |

  119. I WORK IN THIS FIELD by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 3, Informative

    My customers need LONG term storage, like over 100 years. My customers use glass optical disks. They hold 10 gigs a piece, do not break down over time like CD-Rs, and being made out of glass they can survive all but the hottest fires.
    Made by Sony and Plasmon

    1. Re:I WORK IN THIS FIELD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great, just like my solid steel 8 inch magnetic platters.

      Now, where did I put that drive?

      doh!

    2. Re:I WORK IN THIS FIELD by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

      Agreed, thats why the hardware upgrades must be factored into the total cost of storage for the life of the information. I can still go get a drive for a disk that was created 20 years ago, if you upgrade your stuff every 5 years or so you will not have this problem

    3. Re:I WORK IN THIS FIELD by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      From their own site Plasmon.co.uk, the optical media only lasts 35 years or so.

      They really arent much better than DVD-R for long term storage, the benefit is fast random access, like a hard drive.

      So they're decent for archival purpose, having last years catalog 'handy', etc, they're not well suited at all to disaster recovery.

      Btw, they aren't 'made of glass' as you said in your parent post, it's like a hard drive platter 'encased' in glass. The heat will corrupt the magnetic media in the core even though the glass shell might survive.

      If you want 'made of glass', talk to a pro production house about fabricating up some glass masters for you, if your pockets are deep enough.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  120. The Tao of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something forms itself from the silent void of the empty mailing lists and the noisy chaos of the crowded mailing lists. It shapes and protects us, it entertains and challenges us, it aids us in our journey through the ether world of software. It is mysterious; it is at once source code and yet object code. I do not know the name, thus I will call it the Tao of Linux.

    If the Tao is great, then the box is stable. If the box is stable, then the server is secure. If the server is secure, then the data is safe. If the data is safe, then the users are happy.

    In the beginning there was chaos in Unix.

    Tanenbaum gave birth to MINIX. MINIX did not have the Tao.
    MINIX gave birth to Linux 0.1 and it had promise.
    Linux gave birth to v1.3 and it was good.
    v1.3 gave birth to v2.0 and it was better.

    Linux has evolved greatly from its distant cousins of the old. Linux is embodied by the Tao.

    The wise user is told about the Tao and contributes to it. The average user is told about the Tao and compiles it. The foolish user is told about the Tao and laughs and asks who needs it.
    If it were not for laughter, there would be no Tao.
    Wisdom leads to good code, but experience leads to good use of that code.

    The master Cox once dreamed that he was a Kernel. When he awoke he exclaimed: "I don't know whether I am Cox dreaming that I am a Kernel, or a Kernel dreaming that I am Cox!"
    The master Linus then said: "The Tao envelopes you. You shall create great code for Linux."
    "On the contrary," said Cox, "The Tao has already created the code, I will only have to find it and write it down."

    A master was explaining the nature of the Tao to one of his students:
    "Is the Tao in the VM subsystem?" he asked. "Yes," replied the master.
    "Is the Tao in the scheduler?" he queried again. "The Tao is in the scheduler."
    "Is the Tao even in the modules?". "It is even in the modules," said the master.
    "Is the Tao in the Low-Latency Patch?"
    The master frowned and was silent for much time.
    "You fail to understand the Tao. Go away."

    The Tao is the yin and the yang. It is the good and the evil, it is everything and yet it is nothing, it is the beginning and the end.

    The Tao was there at the kernel compile, and it will be there when the kernel panics.

    A novice user once asked a master: "Why compile in C when C++ is more popular?"
    "Why a monolythic kernel when Mach is more popular?"
    "And why use ReiserFS when ext2 is more popular?"

    The master sighed and replied: "Why run Unix when NT is more popular?"
    The user was enlightened.

    A frustrated user once asked a master: "My kernel has panicked, should I post to lkml?"
    "No," replied the master, "You will only bother the Tao."
    "Should I rm -rf?"
    "No, you will have wasted the Tao's time."
    "Well should I search the web?"
    "You will search for all eternity," said the master.
    "Perhaps I should try FreeBSD?"
    "Then you will have disgraced the Tao."
    "I suppose I could try gdb," said the user.
    The master smiled and replied: "Then you will have made the Tao stronger."

    A stubborn user once told a master: "I run version 2.2. I always have, and I always will."
    The master replied: "You are foolish and do not understand the Tao. The Tao is dynamic and ever changing. Linux strives for the perfection that is the Tao. It flows from version to version with peace."

    "So my Linux does not have the Tao, so what?" said the foolish user. "Oh your Linux is of the Tao," said the master. "However, the Tao of Linux follows the Tao of the C library. One day the C library will change, and your Linux will be left behind." The user was silent.

    An angry user once yelled at a master:

    "My Linux has panicked! What lousy software it is, I hate it so!"
    "You are insulting the Tao," said the master. "The Tao is everywhere bringing order to hundreds of networks, aiding thousands of users, and fighting that of which we call the 'lame.' Do not disrespect the Tao; however, the Tao will forgive you."

    "I apologize," said the user, "And I will be more forgiving the next time the Tao fails me."

    "The Tao has not failed you, it is you that has failed the Tao," said the master. "The Tao is perfect."
    The Tao decides if a kernel shall compile, or if it shall abort.
    The Tao decides if a kernel shall boot, or if it shall freeze.
    The Tao decides if a kernel shall run, or if it shall panic.
    But, the Tao does not decide if a box will have no hardware failures. That is a mystery to everyone.

    A young master once approached an old master: "I have a LUG for Linux help. But, I fail to answer my students' problems; they are above me."
    The master replied: "Have you taught them of the Tao?" he asked. "How it brings together man and software, yet how it distances them apart; how if flows throughout Linux and transcends its essence?"
    "No," exclaimed the apprentice, "These people cannot even get the source untarred."
    "Oh, said the master, "In that case, tell them to RTFM."

    A master watched as an ambitious user reconstructed his Linux.

    "I shall make every bit encrypted," the user said. "I shall use 2048 bit keys, three different algorithms, and make multiple passes."
    The master replied: "I think it is unwise."
    "Why?" asked the user. "Will my encryption harm the mighty Tao, which gives Linux life and creates the balance between kernel and processes? The mighty Tao, which is the thread that binds the modules and links them with the core? The mighty Tao, which safely guides the TCP/IP packets to and from the network card?"
    "No," said the master, "It will hog too much cpu."

    The core is like the part of the mind that is static. It is programmed at a child's creation and cannot be changed unless a new child is made; unless a new kernel is compiled.
    The modules are like the part of the mind that is dynamic. It is reprogrammed every time one learns new knowledge; every time one learns better code.
    One is yin, the other yang. Each is nothing without the other.

    A novice came to lkml and inquired to all the masters there: "I wish to become a master. Must I memorize the Linux header files?"
    "No," replied a master.
    "Must I submit code to Bitkeeper?"
    "No," replied the master.
    "Must I meditate daily and dedicate my life to Linux?"
    "No," replied the master again.
    "Must I go on a quest to ponder the meaning of the Tao?"
    "No. A master is nothing more than a student who knows something of which he can teach to other students."
    The novice understood.
    And thus said the master:
    "It is the way of the Tao."

    A user came to a master who had great status in lkml. The user asked the master: "Which is easier: implementing new features to the kernel or documenting them?"
    "Implementing new features," replied the master.
    The confused user then exclaimed:
    "Surely it is easier to write a few sentences in the man page than it is to write pages of code without error?"
    "Not so," said the master. "When coding, the Tao of Linux opens my eyes wide and allows me to see beyond the code, to let the source flow from my fingers, to implement without flaw. When documenting, however, all I have to work with is a C in high school English."

    He who compiles from the stable tree is stubborn
    and unwilling to change, but is guaranteed reliability.
    He who compiles from the current tree is wise but perhaps too conformist, but is guaranteed steadiness.
    He who compiles from the unstable tree is adventurous and is guaranteed new innovations: some good, some bad.
    He who compiles straight from Bitkeeper is brave but guaranteed turbulence.
    They are all of the Tao. One shall respect the old, and debug the new; none shall argue over which is greatest.

    There once was a user who scripted in Perl: "Look at what I have to work with here," he said to a master of core, "My code is interpreted dynamically, the syntax is unique and simple, I have sockets, strings, arrays, and everything I could ever need. Why don't you stop meddling in C and come join me?"
    The C programmer described his reasoning to the scripter: "Script is to C as ebonics is to Latin. If the scripter does not grow beyond that of which he scripts, he will surely [die]. Besides, without C, how can there be script?"
    The scripter was enlightened, and the two became close friends.

  121. Offsite backup by Cuchullain · · Score: 1

    As they say, 'Jesus saves, and he uses offsite backup'

    Cuchullain

    --
    "If sharing a thing in no way diminishes it, it is not rightly owned if it is not shared." -St. Augustine
  122. Cheap offsite storage, how I crave thee... by DesScorp · · Score: 2

    I make sure our backups are done nightly, one tape for each night, with tapes stored in a "fireproof" safe. I take additional measures as well, such as regularly copying important files to other computers in a different area of the facility, and once a month, making a special tape backup and keeping it offsite.

    What I'd REALLY like is cheap online storage. I've checked into it, but our group just can't afford what offsite storage people are asking. It'd be so much easier to just be able to copy our data over a secure connection to another site every night. If the building goes up in flames, hey, last night's data is waiting for you offsite, no problem.

    Oh well. It's GOOD to want things...

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  123. easy by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 2
    What do you do to protect your backups?

    I don't do backups, so i avoid this problem all entirely.

    You know, sometimes you slashdot geeks make things way to complicated.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  124. It's the restore that counts by jbrownc1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting to see someone thinking beyond the actual act of making the backup. All to often, the sysadmin thinks that getting a backup system up and going, and changing a tape each day, is the end of it. They forget that purpose of a backup is a restore. I've seen it happen over and over that the restore fails because of bad media, corruption, etc.

    Home networks definitely get short shrift. I must admit I don't do an offsite of my home network, but I do burn to CD pretty regularly. Haven't played with the Net backup services. Is there one that folks recommend?

  125. Swap CDs (tapes, et al) with a friend, or FTP by migstradamus · · Score: 2

    "Conserve data, backup with a friend." I regularly back up to a second hard drive and to CD-R. Every month or so I swap backup CDs with my girlfriend on the concept that it is unlikely both of our apartments burn down on the same day. It's an easy low-tech solution to offsite backup as long as you have someone you can trust that you see regularly. Do it with a co-worker or family member.

    Actually, since she doesn't have a burner, she FTPs it to my machine and I burn it, which is another alternative in these days of broadband. Even with capped cable upload speeds she can send a few gigs overnight. Set up an FTP server and swap files.

    If you are just backing up the same stuff, get the old media back each time so you can destroy it yourself.

    Of course you should put some sort of encryption or other protection on your offsite data. Definitely do not include naked pictures of an ex-girlfriend on a backup you are keeping at your girlfriend's house. Just a suggestion.

  126. Our System by Synithium · · Score: 1

    We backup to an offsite backup server over a 3Mb link, we back up to on-site tape and central backup, and we keep off-site archives (1 per week, stored for 1 year at a different off-site location.)

    The entire city would have to blow up.

  127. If you haven't restored, you haven't backed up. by Nkwe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Make sure that whatever you do, you have tested your restore process and done so recently. A backup that can't be read is actually worse then no backup at all. If you have no backup then you don't have the comfy feeling of thinking you have a backup.

    When you test your restore, be sure you test it on a machine and tape drive other then the one you used to create the backup. Tape drives easily fall out of alignment. An out of alignment tape drive will generate an out of alignment tape. A mis-aligned tape may work fine in the drive that created it, but may not be readable on any other tape drive. This does you no good if the only tape drive that can read the tape is in a melted ruin.

    If you are in a Microsoft network environment or any other environment that uses a central security or configuration database, (domain controller, directory server, etc.) don't forget to have a backup plan for that as well. Recovering the data is only part of the battle; you also have to recover the logins, security rights, and all other configuration aspects of your network.

    Did you remember to store a copy of the install media and license codes for your backup software at your off-site location along with your backup media? How about written copies of your hardware and software configurations?

    As others have noted, a safe-deposit box at a bank not too physically close to your computers is an economical option. I use this option for my home network. A down side to this is you can only get to your backup media during the bank's operating hours. If you need better access, a professional off-site storage company may be a better option. Many will pick up, deliver, and manage rotations for you.

    Finally, don't forget that there are other things then fire and flood and natural disasters that can keep you from your physical equipment. Your data may be safe on your servers, but you might not be able to get to your servers if there is a chemical spill, civil unrest, or some other police action happening between you and your equipment.

  128. Multi-dorm distribution by Jester99 · · Score: 2

    My friend in another dorm room keeps a small server there for me hitched up to the network. My computer sends file diffs there every night. The server maintains at least five levels of backups of every file, so they can be rolled back.

    (We've got sprinklers, so it's a good idea that they be in separate rooms. If the whole place goes up in smoke... well, I imagine I could probably get an extension on my term papers.)

    I send it all through an ssh tunnel so it's all nicely encrypted end-to-end. Server runs OpenBSD so (hopefully) it's damned difficult for somebody to crack into.

    1. Re:Multi-dorm distribution by dismayed · · Score: 1

      Someone has packaged this nicely, and it was posted on slashdot sometime ago...

      Rsync Snapshots

    2. Re:Multi-dorm distribution by Jester99 · · Score: 2

      Thanks, but my primary system is win 2K.

      I rolled my own system to do the backing up. One of these days I'll clean it up and release it or something.

  129. Re:I'm surprised people have such attachment to da by wondergibbon · · Score: 1

    Well, for a start, my backups include:

    • the last 7 years accounts as required by my taxation authorities
    • correspdondence relating to contracts. One never knows when those pesky lawyers may drop by.
    • work in progress. I get paid by the hour, and I don't get paid by the hour to start from scratch again because I lost what I'd already done.
    • completed projects - I can't guarantee my customers keep secured copies, and I can make it available to them. For a price, of course.
    • snippets of my own code that I can reuse
    • disk images so I can rebuild the server quickly, reduce downtime and kickstart the other machines across the network.
    and that's a two person plus a few staff operation.

    When you're running a business of nay size- and certainly in this jurisdiction- backups are almost mandatory. Data loss - by act of god or shredder - isn't an excuse.

  130. Spam this asshole -- For a good cause. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is spamming me and not removing me from his fucking list.

    KEN@IBA-COMPUTERS.COM
    AKBER@IBA-COMPUTERS.COM

  131. Depending on what you have for data by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    The quick and dirty way is to just setup a cron job on your work machine that just rsync's all your important stuff (such /home /etc) into a directory strucuture called /machinename_backup (where machine name is your hostname). The inital sync will be very painful depending on your connection and the ammount of data you need to move, but after that it'll be probably under a minute. The trick is todo it often so you suddenly don't just have 3 gigs of new data on your drive all the sudden. I'd recommend doing it every 3 hours or something like that. Also if you want to get fancy and you've got the space you can also setup an aged system, where your script just makes a copy of the previous backup and then syncs to the copy and have a set of 7 of these so it's incremental, so if you screw something up, you can regress. Just ideas...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  132. Papers from school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientist: The asteroid's almost here; if we don't determine the function of synecdoche as utilized in Shakespeare's Hamlet and The Tempest, humanity's doomed.

    You: If only I'd made an offset backup before the tornado of '97...

    Scientist: What's that?

    You: Nothing.

    Scientist: May God have mercy on our souls.

    You: (spinning around) Ow! Hey, what the fuck?

    CmdrTaco: Just thought you might not want to die a virgin.

    (explosion, fade to black, roll credits)

  133. Daily trip to the bank + logs by sourcehunter · · Score: 2

    We have an accounting clerk take the tape on a daily basis to the bank next door. He also has to sign on a log saying he did it and then someone else comes by, verifies he did it, and then signs next to him on the log.

    --

    quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
  134. Well... by devphil · · Score: 2
    Why do o many people use physical back-up-tapes,

    Because tapes are cheap and reliable.

    so that it is boring and time-consuming,

    What the fuck...? You think people actually sit there during the backups, watching the blinkenlights? Backups are automated.

    and so that they don't back-up that often, which they store near the computer, so that they all can burn at the same time,

    *shrug* Maybe they're stupid, but all of that applies to any other backup method too.

    As for "remote site" backups, that only works with small-medium amounts of data, and the more data there is, the less remote the site can be before it no longer is worth it. I'm looking into this option for my home systems, but not for work.

    For several hundred gigabytes, for example, remote sites are just not an option. Hence the nice, fast, automated, reliable tape backups.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  135. Offset? Fuck me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offsite.

    There we go. Ruined my only good joke of the day.

    I give up...I'm worthless...I'll never be a great trolley like my father.

  136. Keep a backup in your pocket by TimFreeman · · Score: 2, Funny

    If your backup media are small enough and your pockets are big enough, a reasonable place to keep off-site backups is in your pocket. I can fit CD's into a pocket of the fishing vest I habitually wear, for example. Encrypt any data that you want to stay secret if you're mugged.

  137. Backups by LordKariya · · Score: 1

    Every six months, I burn everything to CD - TWICE. One copy stays at my current location, the other is sent off to a distant land in case of "catastrophic failure". Those Athlons get pretty hot, ya know. Got a DVD burner ? Even easier.

    --
    I alternate between posting +5 and -1 Comments. Karma: +53 -47 = 6
  138. My underwear by beta21 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the safest place I know. No woman (unfortunately) or man (thankfully) will ever venture there.

  139. But only for Windows by devphil · · Score: 3, Insightful


    If Connected had a *nix client, they might be worth invetigating. Seriously.

    As it is, I'd have to do a local tar/dump/something of my data, copy the dump file to a Windows partition, boot into Windows, run the Connected program to chunk across this dump file, then reboot back into something useful.

    Thanks, I'll stick with rsync. :-)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:But only for Windows by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      I use connected.com to backup critical Linux files.

      All it takes is two machines, one running Windows. And these days, there are so many things worth having that are only on windows... why not?

      My linux system periodically creates a tar gz and copies it onto my Windows2000 disk. Late at nite, Win2K uses connected.com to back up my stuff, both the ton of critical windows data and the Linux stuff.

      Works great.

      As mentioned before, restores are a bit slow, but the peace of mind is worth it.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

  140. just had a flood hit my work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I currently am using a external USB2 to 5 1/4 IDE bay, with 2 60G drives in removable bays mounted in the external case. This allows me to easily hot plug the backup device without taking down the server. Every two weeks the Hard drives are switched and the off cycle hard drive is put in the safety deposit box in the bank. We got hit by a flood last night, and so far this system is pulling through (Restore is running as I type this). Luckily the hard drive in the backup unit was ok, so we didn't have to get the older backup from the bank, but its nice to know its there if the drive was toasted.

  141. The Bank by jelle · · Score: 2

    Often, banks have safe storage for you to rent. Some banks even give you a slot for free with a premium checking account.

    Otherwise, maybe keep a set of (encrypted!) disks in your car, so at least it's out of the house. Time to get a DVD-R drive!

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  142. One word by TFloore · · Score: 2

    Hurricane.

    Can you tell I live in Florida?

    The backup at your house, the running version on your lan, and the bank all go the way of the Dodo when that terribly inconvenient Category 5 slams down on top of you. (And no, that's not a roll of network cable I'm talking about.)

    Different branches doesn't help, if they are in the same city. If it's that important, get a safe deposit box at a branch in a city a couple hundred miles away or more. Say, somewhere a good friend or family member lives, so you can stop in when you visit them anyway. No, the backups there won't be updated as often, but they'll be safer from city-level disasters.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
  143. Keeping backups safe by huguley · · Score: 1

    I recomend rectal storage.

    1. Re:Keeping backups safe by skinney · · Score: 1

      See, this could be a good thing for progtologists. And gives a new meaning to Anal Retentive BOFH's.

  144. two words Remote Backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If it's not offsite it is not safe from fire, flood, kids, soda, human error, etc, etc, etc.

    Here's a shop that does remote backups using nothing but opensource tools: open5 Open5(ource).

    They do an O'Reilly site.

  145. Re:I'm surprised people have such attachment to da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Source code for various projects I've done. I personally have shipped two major commercial applications in my spare time. I have about 3 others that I've started and then abandoned for various reasons. This is in addition to what I do at my job. I want to keep the source code around for this.

    Also, emails related to my side businesses. Financial data. Spec documents for projects that I've created business plans for which may someday be funded.

    Sure, if all you have is pr0n and napstered mp3s then you don't have that much to lose. Some people actually have important stuff on their computers. (Imagine that!)

  146. I hope something good comes up soon. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    I'm sick of burning 5+ cdrs a day. I have over 1800 cdrs of data, all burned twice [in case the other gets scratched], for a total of close to 4000 cdrs.

    Restoring and reburning to dvdr (which I don't have yet) is going to be a BITCH. I don't see it possible to do it all, ever. And even if it is possible, restoring cds takes forever.

    When I lost my (60+G/12000) mp3s it took me 8 hours using 3 computers simultaneously to restore the 80 or so cds.... Yuck.

    I need those 200G optical disks they talked about on slashdot awhile ago... when the hell are those going to cme out?

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  147. Re:I'm surprised people have such attachment to da by JimmyBigFish · · Score: 1

    I absolutely understand backups at work. I must not have differentiated appropriately. What I meant was, what do you have AT HOME (assuming you're not running a business at home) that you can't live without. I couldn't think of anything on my home computer that would require super-duper-titanium-never-gonna-break backup. So I was just curious what you all think is that damn important that requires multiple backups including offsite.

    -j

  148. offsite record storage by aderusha · · Score: 3, Informative

    just about any semi-urban city in america has some company that offers off site record storage. this problem isn't new to computers - people have been storing accounting and business records offsite for decades. our service comes to our building every day in a van, carts off a boatload of tapes from the tape library, and returns a month old case to be cycled back into the library. check your local yellow pages, it should be easy to find.

  149. Multiple redundancy. by xenoweeno · · Score: 2

    I slapped a removable drive bay into my computer and picked up two 40gb drives to go with it. Every two weeks I swap them and make a full backup of vital data (pr0n, etc. is always replacable ;-).

    The data is encrypted with public key encryption on the fly as it is copied to the backup drive by piping it through a shell script and other software. I keep the private key on a USB keychain storage unit, whereupon it is also (more weakly) encrypted with a password I ingenuiously store in my brain. ;-)

    The keychain unit is on me at all times. I also have a hard copy of the private key encrypted (more weakly, but with a different password) and uuencoded in a safe deposit box. It'll be a bore to type the page out, if ever necessary, but it'll do the job, and while a piece of paper can be folded/spindled/mutiliated and still be usable, a CD is unusable when broken, and a keychain unit is unusable if magnetic decay visits.

    What do I do with the two drives? Every two weeks I have to fly to a remote office. I drop off the drive with the latest backup with a trusted buddy, and pick up the other drive from him, and the cycle begins anew.

    It's all pretty simple, really.

  150. Backups by luzrek · · Score: 1

    At work we have a very simple method of backup. We keep two copies in different buildings. This method is only really useful if what you want to backup doesn't change very often. Or if you have a very geographically diverse and fast network. For home use we generally only backup data which we generate ourselves (if we downloaded something it is effectively already backed up). Then I put the backup in the trnk of my car.

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  151. HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it floodproof?

    1. Re:HA! by jeepee · · Score: 1

      put you cds in a ziploc god damn

  152. Practical advice by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Interesting
    First, In a business environment. Your data safe for your media is most likely not intended to protect computer media. It is designed to protect things like papers. As a result, I have heard many horror stories of smoke damage ruining tapes, and heat damage ruining cdr's. What you need to do is to have a smaller safe inside of a larger safe. This provides an additional layer of protection for environmentally sensistive data retention methods.


    Do your incremental backup at least once a day. Do a full backup once a week on two media. Keep one on site and the second offsite at a records retention service like iron mountain. Change out media at least once a year. I have seen sites that have been using the same tape backup tapes for years religously and have literally worn out their tapes. Make sure that you also backup your security keys for your data to a safe deposit box or that offsite data retention company. It is too easy for the key to be safely stored online on an admin station or server that gets burned in the fire.


    Some companies that have very large enterprise data centers will even go so far as to have mirrored backup facilities. These companies effecticely have an entire redundant NOC that is at another physically seperate facility. Treat this much as you would your Internet servers in that you want to make sure that this facility has redundant internet and phone connectivity. Some firms that were wiped out by 9/11 had such facilities available in dedicated host sites and were able to seamlessly transition over within the day. The other firms quickly discovered that such space and facilities were taken by other WTC firms that beat them to the puch. This is by far the most expensive option there is, and is also the most survivable. For a company of sufficeint size though, even a single day down would easily exceed the millions this option can cost. Recommended only for very large operations.


    Another option if you have a campus type facility is to lay underground redundant fiber between buildings. Have your redundant servers and tape backups there. This is very expensive if you have to dig up the ground. However once implemented this is probably one of the cheapest to maintain. Many uni's do this as a matter of course. They have enough data to make the occasional tape back up to offsite facilities impractical. This also allows for much higher speed operations that an internet backup. I have worked with (very large) banking facilities and techs from the various vegas casinos, and this practice is fairly widespread there.


    I have also had a number of facilities that had mirroring in use and never realized that the primary disk had failed and that they had been living off their mirror for some time. So check your mirror every now and then to make sure it isn't running off backup. Also, if you have a raid array, make you have a hot swap /and/ a spare disc available. I have seen a nasty lightning storm take out one disk on an array, only to have the same storm take out another disk a few hours later right after the hotswap had just been put in (server room /was/ on ups and line filtering). Afterall if an environmental condition is sufficeint to take out one disk, it's usually sufficeint to take out or fatally damage another.


    Last and most important. Test your backup! I can't tell you how many times I have worked with people that had backups that were worthless. I have probably referred at least one hundred facilities over the years to ontrack for data recovery when their tape backups, hard disks or raid facilities failed.

  153. Bit paranoid aren't we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fire proof safes? Off site backup services? Storing data in SPACE? What are you guys doing on your home machines? I back up the essentials, and only the essentials, onto a CD and keep an extra copy at my parent's house.

    I have a friend who backs up absolutely everything (like a few gigs of personal e-mail, which he admits he has never once needed to refer to, and all his downloaded mp3s and videos). As a result, he rarely bothers doing his massive multi hundred gb backups at all. Guess who will be better off if their house burns down.

    Home users just generally don't have that much important data. Unless you consider "Happy New Year" emails from 1998 or your collection of comedy animated GIFs to be critical, I guess.

  154. Safe Data Practices ... by mikers · · Score: 2

    ... The first thing going through my mind was the need to mail a set of ...

    There is your first problem. To prevent stuff like this going through your mind you need a

    Tin foil hat

    All the data in my head is safe. Is the data in YOUR head safe?

  155. perfect solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) when placing your media in the fireproof safe pack so that it'd survive a good fall.

    2) put the fireproof safe in a blasting shell of sorts surrounded by some explosives with a high ignition temp...

    3) you're done! when the fire engulfs the shell your safe is in, the safe itself will be shot outside... your media/backups will be safe & unmelted!

    1. Re:perfect solution... by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Awsome! I'd love to be downtown gawking at a fire in a high-rise office building, when suddenly--BOOM! And a small safe comes rocketing out from the 13th floor and craters spectacularly in the middle of the street.

      On second thought, maybe a dumbwaiter-style quick-release elevator shaft that shot the safe down to a foam-filled chamber in the basement might be safer (heh) for rubberneckers and firefighters.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:perfect solution... by GT_Alias · · Score: 2
      3) you're done! when the fire engulfs the shell your safe is in, the safe itself will be shot outside... your media/backups will be safe & unmelted!

      At the expense of the poor bloke standing on the sidewalk outside your building window.

    3. Re:perfect solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, you may be on to something big here; a device that keeps your data safe, and gives the rubberneckers/disaster tourists to stay the hell away.

      And the emergency service people, too. Um.

      Well, who needs those when your data's safe?

  156. Cryptographic File System and some redundancy by LM741N · · Score: 2

    I use CFS on /home, so its just easy to tar up my whole home directory in its encrypted form, and then put it on a CD where I can take it into work, etc. No one will never have any idea what it is. It just looks like jibberish files with jibberish data. Hell, I could put 700Meg of p0rn on it, and keep it in the office at work :)

  157. They make media fireproof boxes too... by gosand · · Score: 5, Interesting
    but can the storage format your putting your data on stand up to the heat?

    Oddly enough, I was just looking into these earlier today. They make media fireproof safes. Most of them I saw say that they will keep the internal temperature uner 125 degrees F, and under 80% humidity. 125 degrees is the melting point of most portable media. They seemed pretty costly, but if you are going to get a fireproof box, why not spend the extra $100 to get one that is media friendly? I saw some decent, albeit small, ones for around $250.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  158. Tattoos, P2P, and Windows98 (follow along) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a book where a computer program (an AI) is converted in to fractal images that are then turned into tattoos. The tattoos are then sold, or given away for free, to lots of people (mainly homeless people because they don't move around much). When the computer gets fried, they go around scanning in as many tattoos they can find and then fill in the missing parts by hand.

    Almost off-topic, but entertaining. ;)

    Me, I find a good data disaster is like a forest fire. It is necessary otherwise I collect too much data. P2P, news, mailing groups, chat logs, mp3, divx, 3GB games (with save files). I'm running out of room faster then my computer is crashing. Maybe I need to return to using Windows98? ;)

    1. Re:Tattoos, P2P, and Windows98 (follow along) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some loss of data is good, but you usually end up with 10x more trying to get the original stuff back. I had 500 mp3's when my computer hard drive got zapped, but I had a list saved on the net. I now have 5,000 mp3's from p2p and I still am not sure I got all of those original ones.

    2. Re:Tattoos, P2P, and Windows98 (follow along) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can attest to the forest fire theory. I regularly format my hard drive, once every year or so to get rid of the cruft, orphan dll's, temp files, swap files, savegames, old mp3's, old pr0n, old warez, test files, original artwork, etc. I sometimes backup the important stuff, but when I decide to format my computer, I do not stop to think if I have everything backed up. If I lose something, I can recreate it. The things I cannot recreate, I learn to live without. Before the format I was running out of space, and I had a large mp3 collection, and mainly played the few games that I had installed. Now, after the format I try to keep my hard drive organized, and I have several warez and appz and download the newest ones weekly. A format can change your computing habits.

  159. Kudos to you, sir! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Electronic Telegraph has an interesting editorial about this, but I guess the truly paranoid would never dare to click on that link... "


    My, aren't you the diligent little troll. First MSNBC, now this!

  160. Re:Online Backup - mydocsonline.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For more than a year now I have been using the "web folders" feature of MS-Windows to drag/drop selected files to my online backup at mydocsonline.com.
    True, mydocsonline is really intended for collaboration, so I'm not making use of that part of what I bought. On the other hand, the basic 100mb plan is enough for me, and it is only $15.00 quarterly. SO for a modest end-user type with some files which can be password-protected-zipped, this can make sense.

  161. MICROSOFT BANNER on /. (SORRY, OFF TOPIC) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just saw a Microsoft banner on /. (promoting Visual Studio .NET). Not sure if this has happened/been posted before, but I found this quite funny and couldn't resist to mention ;-)

    1. Re:MICROSOFT BANNER on /. (SORRY, OFF TOPIC) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Here's the url):
      http://ad.doubleclick.net/click;h=v2|2eef|0 |0|%2a| c;4787121;0-0;0;7636119;4252-336|280;1817149|18156 78|1;;%3fhttp://msdn.protier.com/admin/skins/vsdem o/freetrial.aspx?source=OSDN_general_banner

  162. I simply ask myself... by fizban · · Score: 2

    What would Jesus use to do his backups? I mean, I already asked myself "What would Jesus drive?" this morning, so it was a logical next step.

    You'd be amazed at what you can discover by just asking yourself what Jesus would do!

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  163. My company is currently working on this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically what we are doing is a SECURE internet backup. Hell I can't even get into your files on the backup array unless I have your passcode that YOU create for the encryption on your backup.

    I think the coolest part of the program we are using to do this, it does it all by checksums or some shit. You can go back to any date of your backup and get the stuff you backed up that day even if you have changed it on the backup. You might be thinking it would take forever to upload all the shit you want to backup. The first time it would take more time, yes. But after you have your stuff uploaded once, when you goto back it up again, all it uploads is the changes, it doesn't upload the whole thing. I do not claim to know exactly how it works, but it does, and it works perfectly.

    We still have a couple things to finish up on the page and such, but we should be ready for 'public' consumption sometime in the next month. We are already working with some companies and doing their backup, but we still have some QA stuff to do for the internet signup stuff.

    If you are interested in being a 'test' customer please contact me @ ibs@acesdomain.com (this is NOT my company's email address or URL just personal site) with a subject of "Test customer".

  164. No kidding! by RatBastard · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to work for a credit union and we had to restore the mission-critical server (HP/UX for those that care) from a tape and teh tape was hosed. We ended up having to restore from a three-day old tape and we had to re-enter three days worth of transactions, on top of having the front line staff deal with live transactions. Very, very not fun.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  165. Encryption is your friend. by photon317 · · Score: 2


    First off, don't bother backing up your whole PC. Just backup the data you really need to keep (individual documents, financial info, source code, etc). This generally amounts to a small amount of data for most people. Compress it, and then encrypt it with a passphrase you can remember. Try not to forget the key.

    Cheap public storage for bytes of computer data abounds. Once your small data is encrypted, you can essentially store it "publicly", all over the place. Open a junk hotmail account, set the password to something trivial you'll remember, and email as an attachment to that hotmail account. Do the same with a couple other free webmail systems. Mail a copy to a couple freinds, say "please save this file somewhere on your harddrive, in case I need it later" and leave it at that. Drop it in some public ftp upload area somewhere. Etc... etc...

    Once you find a list of placse to drop your data off at, make the delivery part of your backup script, just automate sending the emails, etc...

    --
    11*43+456^2
  166. rsync rsync rsync! And offsite... by Alioth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At work, I've implemented an automatic nightly backup. It uses rsync to back the fileserver's files to another machine in the office, and it also rsyncs these files over SSH to one of our remote branches - so we've actually got two backups. The amount of data we have is only a couple of hundred megs (which is a good thing because whilst we have ADSL at the main office, the remote branch only has a 64K ISDN link - and this is why I also keep a local backup as well as a remote. The remote is a disaster recovery backup, the local is so we can recover from 'oh shit I shouldn't have deleted that file' moments without having to retrieve the file over the 64K link).
    This is all done by a cron job when everyone's gone home. No need to mess with physical media and having to remember to do the backups. The cron job makes tarfiles of everything in /home and all the machine's configuration files (smb.conf, squid.conf, everything in /var/named, /etc/passwd and all the usual files). Basically, in the event of our swerver biting the dust, I just want to be able to re-install the OS then untar the backups and go. I've tested it, too - when I put in a new machine for our server, I used the backups to create the new server after installing the OS.

    I do the same thing for home, too (except it backs up over ADSL to my webserver which is a continent away).

  167. Electronic Cooperation by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

    Get a friend who has a server a few hundred kilometers (or more) away from yours.

    Install rdiff-backup (http://rdiff-backup.stanford.edu/). Create a cron job that backs up your critical data.

    Enjoy nightly, incremental, versioned backups. Wanna restore the latest? Easy. Wanna restore last Tuesday's? No Problem.

    Thus, if you're left with a network connection and a machine after the disaster, you can restore the data as fast as your network will allow.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
    1. Re:Electronic Cooperation by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

      Oh... forgot to mention something.

      If you can't trust your friends with your data, you really need new friends. But if you can't get new friends (who have network connected servers) quickly enough, you can always use Ben Escoto's duplicity.

      That's rdiff-backup with GnuPGP encryption.

      Sweet!

      http://rdiff-backup.stanford.edu/duplicity.html

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
  168. Why, in /. of course! by joaodk · · Score: 1
    You can always stream all backup data to a text file and post it to slashdot as a comment...

    Of course, this is the kind of post that makes moderators overjoyed.

  169. Fireproof safes are a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Many years ago I was at a seminar on disaster recovery (this was back in the 80's) where a group of competent local IT auditors were discussing this issue.

    One of the horror stories was of an organisation that went and purchased a top of the line fire rated safe for their backups. True to form, they had a fire and the tapes were perfectly protected.

    The only problem was the fire service cordoned the building off while they were investigating the incident, and the occupants were unable to gain access for two weeks. They got their tapes back, perfectly preserved, once the debris was removed, but by that point their business went bust.

    At work we have an arrangement with another business in a different suburb. We store their tapes on site, they store our tapes 'off site', and we have contact details in case we need access to them out of hours.

    It's cheap (we do this as a favour), and short of someone nuking our building and taking out the adjascent suburbs it's effective.

    I would suggest that if you are a serious home user, burn your data onto CD-ROMs, and ask a friend to hold the disks. Encode them if you are concerned about security.

    If you are a SME, there are commercial services that will pickup, store, and return tapes for a fee (here in Australia, Brambles offer such a service along with payroll distribution and the usual gun toting cash transfer business).

    If you are a large organisation, mirror your data to your backup hot site.

  170. Re:I'm surprised people have such attachment to da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well..i have :
    important home stuff :
    copies of articles ive written.
    copies of my thesis and various projects.
    stuff ive been working on.
    pictures and video digitized from several travel places.
    CVs and letters and tax records.
    total over 8-10 gigs in all.
    not-so important but still backed up stuff :
    backups of game cdroms
    digitally recorded movies and TV shows (i have a Hauppage card) i want to keep.
    mp3 copies of my cd audio
    mp3s recorded from FM radio (i have a hauppage)
    total over 50-60 gigs in all.

    oh and it grows by a coupla gigs every year.
    i just burn it to DVD-R and forget about it. the important stuff gets burned multiple times. the really important stuff gets burned, tarred, gpg'ed and zipped before being dumped to two separate hard drives and scp'ed to an ISPs unix server.

  171. Well, since we're talking about home networks... by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...for my personal data, I just burn it to CDs every now & then, and then throw the CDs into the glove compartment of my car. Of course, I'm not backing up pr0n, so all my data fits onto 2 CDs, and since I've already got a few music CDs in the glove compartment, might as well drop the other CDs there too. My car is enough "off site" (I don't park in my house's garage) that the data will be fine if my house burns down. I've never had the summer heat bake the CDs into oblivion, they've always been fine. Low end, sure. But it's good enough for home use.

  172. Intersting Idea for Backup by SirCrashALot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Although expensive, I had an idea for a fireproof system that I might implement if my data ever becomes so important that the backup of my documents on my Jornada is insufficent: Basically, a large moisture safe box in the backyard, with a laptop inside it.
    • First dig a hole ~6 ft deep in the backyard and a small trench leading to it.
    • Then lay a pipe with network and power cables in the trench.
    • Cut a waterproof air vent in the top of the safe: A tube with one of those mushroom hats would be sufficent
    • In the safe have a laptop with a 3 HD RAID-1 (complete mirroring) and a DVD-RW drive.
    • The laptop constantly updates your data on the hard disk, and write your misison critical files to the DVD
    This would be sufficent in my mind barring major EMP Shock/Flooding. (Hopefully the DVD would survive flooding and the safe would be a Faraday cage.
    Just my $0.02
  173. Re:I'm surprised people have such attachment to da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Family pictures. It is hard to replace even smoke damaged albums.

  174. Shameless plug by Servo · · Score: 2

    I work for a company that may be of interest on this topic. We provide managed data storage. Among other things, we provide tape backup storage solutions that include offsite data vaulting.

    Arsenal Digital Solutions

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  175. Lets not overreact now. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 3, Funny

    Data protection measures should be comensurate with the risk.

    Is it 100Gb of a.b.p.e or will your livelyhood be destroyed?

    If your house burns down, making sure you still have copies of your "disgusted from Tunbridge Wells" complaints to Channel 5 will be the least of your worries.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  176. Re:I'm surprised people have such attachment to da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many small business owners work from home.

    Therefore

    if(home==work)
    {
    useGoodBackupSystem(myData, outsideStoreage);
    }

  177. Talk to a neighbor by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 2

    I have an unusual situation, but which can be modified to work for others. We own the house next to ours (low-income neighborhood, $20k house) in which we have offices. The server room is the basement of that house. Since we wanted to share the office DSL line with the home PC's, we buried a cat5 cable between the two buildings, connecting their networks. In addition to providing internet connectivity, it also allowed us to host a backup server at home. All data is stored on the servers in the office, and the backup server (two 120G HD's in a RAID array) backs up all of the computers on a nightly basis.

    Depending on how much you trust your neighbors, you could do something similar, though you'd probably want to use wifi instead of a cable. Take an older PC, install Linux on it, put a large enough hard drive in it, and copy files via SSH, negating the need for any kind of wifi "security." A great product to do this automatically is BackupPC. It supports both Windows and *nix clients, though it uses the unencrypted SMB protocol for Windows boxes. This is what I've been using, and it works great.

  178. Media and Data Storage by Itsik · · Score: 1

    The easiest backup practice to implement that I am using is to make sure that you have a 2 copies of each media that you own, original + copy. Store one at home the other one at a friend's house.
    As for the data. There are many offsite virtual drive sites that allow you to upload data and store it there. By compressing and uploading your data once a week on to a third party drive you're actully storing off-site. Which means that if something happens you will have a copy of the media. Once the system is up you will be able to access your off-site stored data also.

  179. One Word: by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2

    Fraud. My bank requires a signature and a date/time be written on a form each time that the box is opened.

    OTOH, my wife would probably have little to lose by committing a little fraud after my murder.

    1. Re:One Word: by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      Does it have a checkbox that says, "My husband is still alive?"

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  180. Re:Dumb moderator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flamebait? Give me a break. The moderator is seriously lacking a decent sense of humor.

  181. Re:hi fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6) ?????????

    7) PROFIT !!!!

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.
    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.

  182. Backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is nothing on my computer that I can't afford to lose; I don't consider the computer to be that secure of a medium so I don't use the computer for the truly important. It'd be a huge pain to replace the mp3's, etc., but nothing important would be lost.

    But if I did require my backups to be kept safe (ie. I had a small business that operated out of the house), I'd have an offsite storage company keep a set for me. AND keep a set in a safe deposit box.

  183. overkill? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

    As a "normal" home user, I have to wonder why other people in my situation are trying to go out of their way to ensure that their porn is backed up properly. Anything that's actually important gets stored on a network fileserver to begin with, and that's really all the backing up I need.

    The fileserver is running a redundant RAID1 hard drive with 20GB of storage, and anything that I value gets stored on that. As an added bonus, the RAID in the fileserver is purely storage, and can be disconnected without affecting the system at all. (If I have to reinstall, for example.) I don't backup that RAID because I don't need to. Frankly, if my house burns down, I'll have bigger things to worry about than preserving my MP3 collection.

    Likewise, my main box, and all my other boxes, use the network fileserver for storing anything important. If I have to, I just wipe the hard drive and reinstall without thinking twice.

    It amazes me, though, that so many people want to have 15 dozen redundant backups stored at 5 different locations, so that they don't lose their english paper. Don't get me wrong. I mean, I'd rather they back up their important data somehow than leave it without backup, but it's bordering on ridiculous to think that your average joe needs anything more than a network fileserver to store the important stuff on. And that's all that really needs to be backed up. You don't need a recursive backup of the last five days of (800MB Office suite), (Operating System), etc.

    Such fileservers exist on the Internet, and price range varies. I'm reasonably sure you could get by with something like Geocities for your backup if you really need to, but there's also stuff like XDrive (www.xdrive.com), and failing all that, who among us doesn't know at least one geek with highspeed internet and a Linux or BSD box to set up an FTP/filespace?

    If you're really in a position where your life will end if you lose a certain file, then you can afford the 5 bucks a month for XDrive.

    As for a small company, toss a removable hard drive in the network fileserver. Back up the RAID onto that hard drive every night at closing, or every 24 hours for a 24/7 operation and put it in a fireproof safe, or better yet take it to a different location. It's not rocket science, and the whole thing can be set up for less than $1,000 with pennies a month maintenance.

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  184. CVS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I put all the important data in a CVS tree and then I rsync the main CVS tree from crontab to three different machines in different geographic locations who backup everything. (I'm a university researcher, so this is an option for me)

    The good point is also that when visiting another university or a conference I can quickly set up all the personal config files correctly just by doing cvs up and then running an installation script in the right directory.

    1. Re:CVS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fag

  185. External USB2/1394 hard drive by GooseKirk · · Score: 2

    For home use, you can't beat an external exclosure with a whopping great hard drive. NewEgg has a great one for $76 that's USB2 and Firewire. Keep it in your office and take it home with you once a week, and back up changed files.

    It's offsite, it's fast, it's reasonably cheap, it's easy, you'll know if there's a problem with the media, you can plug it in anywhere and read your files with no special drives or drivers, and you can easily upgrade as you need more space.

    Sure, it's more ghetto than 'leet, but it'll do the trick...

  186. Like Linus Said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it."
    -- Linus

  187. Blast it into orbit... by Kazir · · Score: 1

    ... it's the only way to be sure. *grin*

  188. Buried Treasure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the thinking I like to see on Slashdot. If the feds ever storm your house you can set off an EMP wave Matrix-style and your home data will be destroyed.

    But you have to have secret backup location that are hiden in a public area. I have a hard drive buried in a park(woods) in Michigan. It is sealed up tight in a ammo box, and I am the only person that knows where it is. It is also locked and linux formated so if it got into someone's hands they won't be able to read it easily.

  189. Simple fire/water/goat-proof backups by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

    To backup data, I print all my files as a binary string. Adding a decimal to the left I get number like:
    0.110010101101010110100011010101011101010.. .

    Then I make a mark on an inanimate carbon rod such that the ratio of the length of one segment of the rod to the length of the other segment is a fraction equivalent to my binary string.

    To restore data, I simply accurately measure the segments on either side of the mark, calculate the fraction, and type in the binary string.

    What could be easier?

  190. Re:I'm surprised people have such attachment to da by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

    Stuff I need to back up at home that requires rock solid, offsite storage? A lot of stuff...

    1) I'm a fairly rabid railroad enthusiast/photographer in my off-work hours. A decent number good enough for publication, several actually published. I shoot about 20-30k images a year, and I keep everything. I do mean everything. Bad stuff gets sorted out, but kept anyway just in case it comes in useful in the future. Losing it would mean losing several thousand hours of time, tens of thousands of dollars in vehicle wear, gas, food, lodging, airfare, and good photos of some never-to-be-seen-again shots. A huge chunk of the last six years of my life down the drain if it was to get lost. Not counting the railroad stuff, also included are several thousand shots of family events, people and places I've known, scans of old historical documents, etc.

    2) Schematics/source code/misc design files for numerous electronic devices I've designed and built over the years. Included would be a Microchip PIC/IDE hard disk MP3 player, a 2kW solar array maximum power point tracker, an ultrasonic pump cavitation sensor for bulk liquid tractor-trailer rigs, a completely modular and networked model railroad signalling system, and a whole pile of things I can't think of right now. Again, more countless hundreds of hours of effort that I'd lose.

    3) The usual personal stuff - tax records, email discussions with people/companies I've contracted with (not to mention jobs I've done for free for those that have asked), email records of purchases, bank statements, and all manner of other goodies. Also included are numerous whitepapers, articles, two small (under 30 pages each) undergrad thesis papers from college, personal letters, hours upon hours of website work, etc.

    My backup solutions?

    As far as photos, everything's burned to CD in duplicate once it's sorted and named. One copy stays at my house, one is migrated across town to a friend's place. Oh yeah, and 75% of it is all accessible online with a very liberal license, so hopefully other people have picked up and saved the good stuff.

    Same goes for much of the electronics information - I've posted a good chunk of it (or at least what I think will be useful to others) online with open and free licensing (GPL or BSD for software, GPL or other open hardware license for hardware, typically). However, since my webserver alternately serves as a nice warm footrest while I'm sitting at my desk, the redundancy of the machine alone won't really help me in event of a disaster at my house.

    The main strategy I've got is an IDE drive in a firewire case (120Gb) that I leave at work. Once a week I take it home and mirror my data drive onto it. However, with the 120Gb data drive approaching full, I've got a dilemma.

    That said, I've also got a few friends starting an online storage company. However, my main problem is getting the archive loaded in the first place. My data's nearly static, but by the sheer volume and my hideously slow DSL (IDSL, if you're wondering) connection, it would take months to get it all transferred the first time.

    It's cheaper, easier, and faster to just haul an external drive back and forth from the office every week. Of course this obviously leaves me vulnerable for 8-10 hours every week (the time when the backup drive is at home), but since I'm in the house too it seems like a reasonable risk.

    ND

  191. Restore Procedure by Phoenix_SEC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every so often, it's a good idea to do a dry-run of a recovery (on a blank system - NOT your main system). Too many times I've seen people who have current backups that a) are on bad media that was not flagged by the backup procedure or b) only parts are recoverable (e.g., database backups that can only be loaded onto the original system).

    Sadly, I've also seen backup software with bugs that make a full (sometimes even a partial) recovery impossible. Most people just assume that since the computer says it's backed up, it is.. riiight.

    Phoenix_SEC

  192. Re:I'm surprised people have such attachment to da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E-mail correspondance with friends for start. Address book information. Sucks to lose everyone's e-mail address and phone number at the same time. (Yeah, I shouldn't be so digitally-enslaved, but my handwriting sucks. Anyway, a paper copy of that info is essentially a backup for me.) I have short stories and programming ideas going back over a decade that I'd hate to lose. Digital pictures of family, my sister's wedding, friends, vacations, etc, that cannot be replaced. Financial records.

    I can backup almost everything important to me onto a single zip disk or a few floppies so long as I don't include digital pictures. With those I need a few CDs for a complete backup.

    It would hurt to lose my MP3s to something like a hard drive crash since it took me a few months to rip all of my CDs, but it would really hurt to lose all of my CDs to a fire. Augh! Perhaps it's time to invest in a DVD burner...

  193. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by jred · · Score: 2

    You should already have a backup of your mp3s... The original disc :)

    A friend & I have reciprocal online backups. He has space on my server to scp files, & I have space on his. I trust his security much more than I trust my ISPs.

    --

    jred
    I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  194. iPod...they don't use firewire for nothing... by djupedal · · Score: 2

    Put your most important data on your iPod and grab it on your way out the door.

  195. iPod by droleary · · Score: 2

    Given that this is for a home network, the storage needs shouldn't be greater than can fit on something like an iPod, and if an event happens that messes up both your desktop and something on your person, your problems are bigger than a backup can solve. Oh, and an encrypted disk image is your friend!

  196. Linus' way by heikkile · · Score: 2
    Upload on the net, and let the world mirror it :-)

    But since I do not necessarily believe our stuff to be interesting enough for the world, I also rsync it to a central backup server that keeps cp-al's for past seven days, plus four weekly ones. (yes, it has a big disk, even if it is only selected files...). Every night this backup server rsyncs the recent stuff to my home box over ssl for off-site backup. We don't have hurricanes or earthquakes here in Denmark, so I believe 2km must be sufficient distance. We are also setting me up as a secondary DNS, so if the office goes, I can host our website or at least point to it.

    And yes, we have tested the procedures, and recovered accidentally deleted files (but we haven't burned down the office just to see if that works...). All seems to work quite well. And the company pays me a good fat ADSL pipe and some extra disks.

    --

    In Murphy We Turst

  197. my home network back system by bogie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Basically my system is for the cheap and really lazy average user, but it still works fairly well. You'll need to spend some money, but that's just comes with the territory.

    You need either a cdrom burner or tape drive on your server. You should be able to get a used 4/8GB DAT tape drive and scsi card off ebay for $100 max or a 48X burner for around $60. Then you'll need to get some 4/8 dat tapes which are dirt cheap at like $3-5 per tape, or some 50 packs of cdr discs which cost around $15. You'll of course need a hard drive big enough to store all your stuff, but considering you can get a 80GB one off pricewatch for under $100 that shouldn't be a problem. Also I personally use software RAID 1, which is nice, but if your short on funds you can do without it.

    Basically on your server either linux or windows 2000, you have two shares or volumes dedicated just to your data. One is your read-only permenant share of mp3's,docs and crap you've downloaded. This share is readonly as an extra precaution. You can just pull what you need off it and copy it to your temp share if the file has been changed and needs to be backed up. The other is a read/write "temp" share which besides being a area to store New data you've downloaded, is for files you've worked on from your readonly share and as a result now need to be backed up. After they are backed up, you will then move them back to the readonly share.

    On the temp share you will be using a quota system that should come with your OS. You will set this quote for say 650MB for cdrbackup and say 3.75GB if your backing up to a 4/8GB tape drive.

    Now what this system does is stops the most common problem for backups. Since most people A) don't remember to backup and B) just stuff file after file on their server, is stop them cold if they exceed their temp storage space, which now is the same exact size as their backup media. At that point you HAVE to backup, and then you can move those files to your read-only share for further safe keeping. I constantly see people who put off backing up and then realize they have 25 GB that need to be backup up to Cdr. One additional step which although like RAID 1 most people won't due, is to make 2 copies everytime you backup. This is actually really easy and it then allows you to keep one set of backups offsite and one onsite. Offsite can be anywhere, that isn't in your same dwelling.

    This system isn't one I would ever use at a client, but it works well enough, is cheap, and doesn't let the user's datasize grow widly unless they override the quota, which at that point nothing can help them.

    Hopes this helps.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  198. Backups onto iPod by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    Out of all my data, I only consider about 200 MB of it irreplaceable, or don't want to bother reproducing. My emails, PGP keys, certain preference settings, etc.

    Every week, or as situations warrant, I run a script that copies files and folders that need to be backed up from all corners of my system to a folder, then I copy it to a disk image on my 5 GB iPod (the image is encrypted, so if the iPod's lost or stolen they'll need to spend quite a bit of effort getting at my data).

    It's not as good as tape or burning a CD and putting it in a safe deposit box, but since the iPod goes everywhere I go, the backups are reasonably safe. It's not like the data's life and death for a company.

  199. Offsite and firesafe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to your local bank and get a safety deposit box. Best offsite/fireproof solution.

  200. burn cds, put in deposit box/bury in backyard/etc. by edward.virtually@pob · · Score: 1

    cd-r/rw represents the most cost effective means of backup coverage for the home/small business user. some good places to store disaster-recovery copies of important backups are OFFSITE locations like a safety deposit box at your local bank, buried in a box in the backyard, etc. as others have pointed out, a "fireproof" safe in the same location as the computer is NOT a good place. important tips: VERIFY important backups -- if you haven't actually tried to read the media, it hasn't been verified. also, burn more than one copy of any important backup and verify all of them.

  201. goood God, get a grip by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Funny
    if there is an huge earthquake, nuke,or hurricane that takes out my house and all the local banks, the last thing in the freakin WORLD I'm gona worry about is any silly data on my home system. For the most part, everything but the movies and music can be put on one CD (which I do every once in a while). If my house burned down, I would just say "oh well" to the stupid whatever files on my system. If they were THAT important it would be easy to find a safe place to put them. Hell, start a project on sourceforge, and upload the ultra-top-secret weapons plans or whatever the HELL you have that's so important as an encrypted file. Or...I dunno. Whatever. Get creative. You know, there are aliens at the bank - and they work for the secret government agencies. When you leave, they open your safety deposit boxes and pilfer the info. If you have really important stuff in there, then they cause a hurricane to take out the bank. Its really scary.

    get a grip. How could a person possibly have non-work related data that was truely THAT important that was more than, say, a meg? You know how much TEXT is in a freakin meg? That's right - a million characters :P

    I'm just as paranoid as the next unix admin...ABOUT IMPORTANT DATA...you know, like the data at work that my company has many millions of dollars coming up with. The research equiptment can be replaced, and the public databases can be recovered eventually, but there's some sets of data that is ultra important. But that's REAL data. Just because your computer has a 120Gb drive now doesn't mean you really have backup issues.

    can anyone actually justify this nonsense? Can someone please enlighten me as to why a person would have more than 5 megs of data that they'd need to save in case of emergency? You know...data that you'd be worried about melting? Birth certificates can be replaced fairly easily really, especially when the government knows your house was swallowed by a 500' gorilla that ate your whole town. When that happens, the last thing that you'll need to worry about is your freakin bank statements. Your bank doesn't exist anymore, remember?

    yeesh

    1. Re:goood God, get a grip by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      as a follow up, I'd like to say that the sarcasm might have obscured that I feel that a safety deposit box is more than adequate for this purpose with any sane person. If its not adequate, you're either 1) crazy, or 2) a person running a business or research lab out of their home. If the answer is 2, then you should go ahead and splurge for the more expensive options.

  202. My backup procedure by srojamnosaj · · Score: 1

    I back up all of my data from my two boxes to a second HD on one of the boxes in case of OS or disk failure, but what do I do in case of fire?
    Simple I printed out all of my important files. Now you're thinking, "that must be reams of paper how do you organize it?" Simple as well, I scan it all in and store it on my PC. So now if something goes wrong with my PC, I just grab the scans off of my...oh crap...I think I discovered a problem.

    1. Re:My backup procedure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe... with all that paper floating around aren't you creating *more* of a fire hazard??? ;-)

  203. Work in the IT Dept. use your employers solution by Calimus · · Score: 2

    I work in the IT Dept. for a large company and I just piggy back my backup tapes and or CD's with the ones from my employer.

    I do this with my Boss's permission of course and the offsite company that stores our data is very nice, I've taken a tour of the facility. The vault is water/fire proof, climate controlled and insured out the wahzoo. Best of all, I don't have to pay for it even though I did offer.

    Those of you that work for companies that use an offsite storage vendor may want to look into something similair to what I did. Even for a small fee it's well worth it.

    I also keep a duplicate set close to home so that I can get to them in a major emergency.

    --
    Trying to be different, just like everyone else.
  204. I'll bet I'm not the only one... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

    who ftp'd a tarball somewhere after browsing this thread.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  205. Tell me... by Scutter · · Score: 2

    Yes! My tagline *finally* comes in handy!

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  206. VPN to an encryption chunk of disk at a friend's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend and I have swapped a disk partition at each others' place. We VPN/FTP files over, encrypted just because.

    Simple and cheap.

  207. Rsync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have friends right? Online at least. find yourself a newbie or two on a decent connection. Fix their box every once in a while so you don't lose your data and rsync your inportant stuff to you homedir on their box.

  208. Automated FTP backup utility??? by thetman · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of an automated ftp backup utility, free or commercial? something where you can specify the files or directories you want backed up and the destination ftp server, possibly supporting compression and/or file restore capabilities??

    1. Re:Automated FTP backup utility??? by kcb93x · · Score: 1

      Read the Automated... entry by OneFix entered after yours, ask him for his Linux script.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  209. Real men don't make backups... by mrjb · · Score: 1

    ...as Linus said, they have the last version of their work mirrored :)

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  210. Excess capacity at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I store them on excess capacity that nobody is using, sees, or even cares about, and keep a copy online. Really really handy.

  211. too damn expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    %df -h
    Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
    /dev/da0s1a 504M 320M 143M 69% /
    /dev/da0s1e 2.0G 1.2G 646M 65% /usr
    /dev/da0s1f 1.2G 3.5M 1.1G 0% /var
    procfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /proc
    /dev/vinum/media 1328G 716G 604G 54% /media

  212. granite vault by winse · · Score: 1

    I keep my backups in a Granite vault inside of a nearby mountain. The media de jour is actually redundant scsi drives packed in silica to keep out moisture. This allows for easy access in an emergency, and planned access when said drives are deemed replaceable by the NEWMEDIA.

    --
    this sig is deprecated
  213. my backups are decent I think.... by greymond · · Score: 1

    I have an 8gig external SCSI drive which holds copies of all my "essential" stuff. Then I periodically spend a few hours writing these files onto cd's.

    Of course if there was ever a fire which destroyed my apartment I guess these would be pretty moot

    so 100 megs of some "select" files get put in a temp folde ron my website - whihc is hosted by some company somewhere out in space.

  214. FTP it to my box! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    I'll keep a login account for you. All your warez^H^H^H^H^H passwords^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H stuff will be safe, I promise.

  215. Silica Gel - DO NOT EAT by Speare · · Score: 3, Informative

    My firesafe came with a large packet of dessicant for just that reason. If you open the safe on a regular basis, this shouldn't be much of a problem.

    Silica gel is the most common type of dessicant. That's the little packet labeled "DO NOT EAT" in just about any consumer electronics packaging. I've saved the little packets in a jar for years, but I'm sure you can also buy them directly.

    I recommended to a friend who wanted to save some backup CDRs that they put a small firesafe (the kind with a handle) inside a larger firesafe. Put CDRs and silica gel in the smaller one; put hanging folders in the remaining space in the larger one. (The moderate moisture is fine for paper storage when the temperature is rising, but not as good for the CDRs.)

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Silica Gel - DO NOT EAT by meatspray · · Score: 2

      Ahh dessicants,

      Those little packets you see in electronics bags purpose isn't actually to keep you product dry, any sufficient ammount of water able to get all the way in to your package is much more than those poor little nodules can take care of.

      The packets are actually designed to make the product and packaging dry in the first place, sucking any humidity out of the package to begin with. By the time these little guys get to you, they're usually all used up.

      Most dessicants I am familiar with are clear. After they saturate, the tracers become orange or pink, letting you know that they are saturated.

      I've read that you can bake them in the oven to bring them back, but i've never had the need to try.

    2. Re:Silica Gel - DO NOT EAT by dildatron · · Score: 2

      interesting - i did not know that, but it makes sense once you think about it (the moisture has to go somewhere...).

      If I am every really really bored I will try baking dessicants and let you guys know the results.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    3. Re:Silica Gel - DO NOT EAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've baked the silica gel, it does restore it, but usually when you get a package with dessicant in it it hasn't been saturated yet.

    4. Re:Silica Gel - DO NOT EAT by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      Silica gel is the most common type of dessicant. That's the little packet labeled "DO NOT EAT" in just about any consumer electronics packaging. I've saved the little packets in a jar for years, but I'm sure you can also buy them directly.

      I believe that craft stores sell it to gardeners, who use it to dry cut flowers.
      Since the flowers are packed in the gel itself (like hard drives are packed in foam peanuts), rather than just being placed in a container with a packet of the stuff, my guess is that it is sold in bulk, probably in 1-5 lb bags (but I haven't actually bought any myself, so I could be wrong).
      And, as another poster mentioned, you can restore the gel by baking it at low temperature.

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    5. Re:Silica Gel - DO NOT EAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.desiccantcity.com/BULK_DESICCANT.HTM (no prices listed)

      Also, your local glass shop (window glass, not stained or auto) probably has a ten or fifty gallon drum of the stuff sitting around; they use it in double-glazed window units. In my experience, they're pretty free with it since even a busy shop has trouble using up that quantity within its shelf life. (The price breaks on bulk dessicant are such that it's usually better to buy *way* too much than simply enough.)

      Test it by taking a handful and sticking your hand in water; really fresh dessicant will quickly become hot enough that you'll want to drop it. If it just gets fairly warm, it's still usable.

  216. Some thoughts on data backup... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    Putting CD-R media in a fireproof safe is probably not very good insurance. A fireproof safe is designed to prevent paper from burning. Paper burns at 451 degrees F. A CD-R can be rendered useless from sitting in your car in the summer - it would be completely melted even in a fireproof safe.

    On this same train of thought however, you could store a monthly backup on CD-R or DVD-R at a bank in a safe deposit box.

    Another small bit of backup I've been using is one of those small cigarette-lighter sized USB flash storage devices. It holds 256 MB - enough for all my most important documents, and I carry it everywhere. If you do this, you'll very much want to make sure your data is encrypted (I use GPG) incase you misplace the device and someone else should find it.

    Just my 2 cents.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  217. Automated... by OneFix · · Score: 1

    I have key data that I want to have backed up..."My Documents" on a W2k machine...various data files for "key apps" (buddy lists, messages, bookmarks, Palm Backup, etc)...I have automated this process by having my Linux box tar and (get this...) RAR the files from the network. I have found that the Linux version of RAR seems to compress these files much better than BZip/GZip...

    I wrote a small script that compresses all of these files (~20M/day...compressed) every day (with the name of the day in the filename) and once a month (first of the month) it copies the newest file to a filename with the date in it...when my "LanBackup" directory has ~650M of data in it...it sends an instant message to me (ICQ) notifying me that it is time to do a complete backup.

    For more frequent backups I use a CD-RW that I keep in my car (I don't have a garage).

    I'm sure that this process could be changed to weekly if need be...but at any given time, I have 7 days of backups and another set of monthly "snapshot" backups.

    When you think about it, there's alot of data that you don't NEED to save...I'm going to guess that 90% of your data is stuff that can be easily replaced (Binaries for games/apps, USENET/P2P downloads, etc)

    I also backup specific directories on my Linux & BSD boxen.../home.../etc.../root Directories (excluding RPM files and anything in "archive" directories).

    And as for daily off-site backups, it would be easy to add an FTP to this process...the script I wrote takes a simple config file with a list of directories to backup, which makes it easy to add new directories.

  218. Simple! Stego and Crypto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Encrypt your file and hide them IN your pr0n. Everyone will store your data for you. Then you just have to find it. =)

  219. Saving Data by andrew_lewis · · Score: 1

    That's easy. I multi-directionally broadcast it into space. In the event I need to recover the data, I'll just invent a faster-than-light drive, zip out past the signal, and pick it all up on an antenna. At sufficient signal strength, it should be recoverable long past my expected lifetime. For extreme cases I encode it into a narrowly focused laser, which I aim at the event horizon of a black hole. If figure it'll last until the universe collapses, at which point time-travel becomes the best option.

  220. Only wimps use tape backup ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... real men just upload their important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it. ;)

    -- Linus Torvalds

  221. biblical by cornflux · · Score: 1

    media: stone tablets
    storage location: the Ark of the Covenant

  222. Linus got it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    didn't he say something along the lines of:

    "I don't backup. I open-source my data. Let the world back it up for me."

  223. buddy backup by firewood · · Score: 1

    A hard disk is the cheapest backup media. Find a trusted buddy in another geological and geographic area, and buy each other a larger hard disk drive (cheap these days). Periodically ftp each other encrypted archives of your home directories (overnight on slower links). If you don't have an out-of-state buddy whom you trust, then just buy some disk space on an out-of-state web hosting facility and ftp there. Also keep a backup version or two locally on a portable and removable hard disk so you don't have to bother your buddy for accidentally deleted files, etc.

  224. Mail your backup to china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best and sheapest way to backup your data is to burn it on cd's and mail them to an unknown address at the other end of the world. In time they will return address unknown.

  225. store everything 180 degrees out of phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously the most secure way is to store all your backup data 180 degrees out of phase with the rest of the world...

  226. Protect your applications as well as the data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not enough to protect just your data. You need to protect the applications as well. Sounds trivial until you have to reinstall from
    scratch and realize you don't have a media, or license numbers for commecial software you purchased. (OK - open source would be easier - but you may have to install onto different hardware, and that could cause problems)

    What you need is a "recovery plan". Think about what you would need if you had to recover from a total loss.

  227. My Firewire backup system on OS X by scout.finch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've worked up a decent and simple backup system for my OS X G4 at home. It could use a little more in terms of updating key directories a few times a day, but:

    1) I took a 5.25" external CD-ROM Firewire case
    2) Put in cheap-ass removable drive-sled sytem
    3) Put 2 60GB drives in sleds
    4) Bought one of those $250 media safes, put it next to my desk
    5) Have Dantz Retrospect backup to the Firewire drive nightly my entire system
    6) Occasionally open the safe, take out the other drive and swap it for the existing one.

    This is all because I'm lazy so off-site won't happen. The safe weighs about 80 pounds and the lock is cheap but would take a bit of effort to open (more than nothing). So if the computer nukes, I'm backed up to last night. If someone breaks in and smashes/steals everything in a junkie rage the safe is probably more annoying than it's worth.. backed up to a few days ago. Ditto for fire as long as it isn't a total multi-hour inferno.

    Simple, not too expensive, and simple/reliable. You could also use Retrospect or Apple Backup to backup key files and document directories over the net throughout the day as well.

  228. This is what my dad does... by milou · · Score: 1

    He backs up his files once a week and just emails it to me. The files aren't too big so this works just fine.

  229. Well.... by Audacious · · Score: 1

    I think my CD collection is very well backed up in KaZaa-dum! ;-)

    --
    Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
  230. Get Real by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2

    Let's differentiate between personal data and business data. If we're talking about a business and the data is required for the business to reasonably run, that business had better come up with a decent disaster recovery plan including keeping their data at a secure, off-site location.

    Now let's talk personal data. Face it, most of the data we're talking about would be, at worst, an inconvenience if lost. You can get copies of most everything we're talking about from say your bank or the government, etc. if there is a problem and the value of the data is just the amount of inconvenience it would cause to jump through whatever hoops are required to get a copy of it. Likewise, most of this data is of little or no value to anyone else (other than maybe someone trying to pull off identity theft). So you can probably be fairly safe by simply keeping a spare copy of the CD-RW or whatever your backup media of choice is in your desk drawer at work or a locker there, at a friends house, etc.

    There are exceptions to what I'm suggesting (e.g., someone who runs a business out of their house) but, for most people, just keep a copy of your backup some place besides where the system is that your backing up. Believe me, your life isn't that interesting that anyone really wants to steal your backup.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  231. more than one problem needs more than one answer by mclancy10006 · · Score: 1
    There are three levels of backups:

    Operational Recovery: Gee I deleted this file, broke the hard drive, etc. aka Recovery from flukes and stupidity

    Disaster Recovery: Gee my office turned into a dust pile, I should have that file. aka Recover from bad karma

    Archive: Umm gee Mr. Aircraft Manufacturer did you test that engine mount when you built the plane? aka Recover from lawsuits.

    Since the storage times and recovery times are different you may well need different solutions. Operational recovery is short term 99% of the time. I need this back now so I want it close at hand. DR is a little longer term to recover. I get data sent to my backup site or a new machine and restore. Archive is much longer storage duration and higer latency for retrvial. I need this before I get to court next week.

    I'd argue that long term storage of data should not be in raw format. How the heck am I going to recover a database file 17 years from now? (say for a patent dispute)

    Be careful with your 'glass' based storage archive. I ran into this problem a few years ago. We were storing Ingres database files from VMS systems to RV-20 magento-optical platters. What would I do if we had to recover that data now???

    Ingres=CA=Dead, RV-20=Digital Equipment Corp=Dead, VMS=OpenVMS=DEC/COMPAQ/HP=still alive.

    1 out of 3 doesn't get my data back.

    Our solution to the above was lo-tech, but it works. We output the data in column format to microfiche.

    IMHO the full suite requires a 3 pronged strategy

    Local storage operational recovery offsite media - DR offsite & onsite - image ready copy or technology refresh regiment. (Maybe HTML may live long enough)

    -M

    BTW: I live 4 blocks from a 16 acre testament to DR planning...

  232. Oh get real by Proc6 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Sorry, as someone who's been through a fire, I must rant.

    Oh for the love of God, we're talking about someone's personal home backups. Im pretty sure no one needs daily copies of all their data at 300 mile seperated bank branches. Who are you that your data is that important, Jesus? I think the original question of the article was based around home backup methods. If you own some massive business in the WTC, trust me, youll have better alternatives. A place I know takes a set of tapes down to salt mines in Kansas City every single day, where they're practically oblivious to every kind of catastrophe that leaves most of humanity intact. If this is for home, just dump your drive once in awhile to some CDRs or DVDRs and put them at work or something. Trust me, I lived through a fire in my home (total loss, not just some kitchen fire), and the last thing I was concerned about was my mp3s. What about your wife's wedding dress? What about your pets? Children? All your legal documents? What are you doing to do, keep your grandpa's world war 1 pocket watch in a kryptonite box in a vault at NORAD? Shit happens. If youre one of the 98% youll probably go through life without a single catastrophic disaster, if you have one, we'll, youll pick up the pieces and start over and you'll realize pretty quickly how really little mose of those 0's and 1's mean in the grand scheme of things.

    If you have some REAL important shit at your house, chances are it doesnt change daily. Burn it to CD and send a copy to grandma for Christmas once a year if it makes you sleep better at night, but keeping 10 copies of everything across 300 miles of bank safes, and spending $1000 on a firesafe to protect $2 in JPEGs, its all just really retarded when you actually go through a loss like that.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  233. The Bank! (And charge it to the IRS) by mozilla · · Score: 1

    I keep three tape backups with the oldest being rotated through my safe deposit box at the bank where I keep all of my papers that need to be safe from fire and theft.

    If you keep stock certificates, savings bonds, or other financial instruments in the safe deposit box, the fee is deductible on schedule A.

  234. Uh... by Burning1 · · Score: 1

    ...you've never had your wallet stollen, have you?

    * Once lost it all when he left his wallet, keys and cell phone in his gym bag and someone ran off with it. -_-

    It's not a place I'd want to keep sensitive data.

  235. Re:Online Backup - mydocsonline.com by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 1

    Password protected zip files are horribly insecure. They can be cracked within a minute on average. I'd suggest using PGP or some other vastly more secure method of encryption on the zip file.

  236. Use cookies by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2

    Many are worried about ensuring that your backup is at great distance from your machine, but complain about the effort of taking it elsewhere.

    The obvious answer is to back your data up, in lots of tiny pieces, in cookies stored on the PCs of everyone that visits your web site. Your only problem is to then get enough hits.

    I suppose that restoring might be interesting, but work that out when it happens -- disasters only happen to other people :-)

  237. Cowboy Neal... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

    ... is my backup repository.

    --
    That is all.
  238. Safr place for your safe by MountainLogic · · Score: 3, Informative
    A couple of things to keep in mind for safes:

    1) Put the same in the basement. In fires heavy things such as safes will loose support and crash into the basement and crack open.

    2) Suround the safe with non-flamable mass (cindar blocks). Or better yet, install the safe the "wall" of your basement.

    3) Put your media in zip lock bags. Sure, the media may be intact, but it only takes a tiny bit of crud to trash magnetic media. Smoke particles are often ionized and will bond tighter to your disk than the mag particles.

    1. Re:Safr place for your safe by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      1) Put the same in the basement.

      I assume you meant "safe." Anyway, not all houses have basements. I am currently living in the south (against my will), and when I ask about basements, people look at me funny. "Oh yeah, I've seen those in movies!" Also, some people live in apartments. Otherwise, good advice. I didn't think about the smoke molecules, but now that you mention it, I am reminded of a computer I once had to salvage from fire damage. It was amazing where we found solidified smoke: inside disk drives, PCI slots, etc. And I'm sure safes aren't air (or smoke) tight.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    2. Re:Safr place for your safe by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Not only that, but in the event of a fire, the basement is the area least likely to be engulfed (fire tends to go UP, remember).

      Modern cinder blocks crack all to hell in high heat, and are extremely poor insulators. Solid concrete is somewhat better. But I'd suggest solid-sheet asbestos fireplace backing, if you can find any. (It's only dangerous if powdered.) I can tell you from firsthand experience that it will keep dry plywood from igniting when there's a 1500 degree fire making an iron stove glow red, only 6 inches away from the wood.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Safr place for your safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the gas in cement and bricks burn at the same temp as wood. Remember, wood does not burn it breaks down. The gas in the wood is what burns.

    4. Re:Safr place for your safe by gorilla · · Score: 2

      You can get fireproof ceramic sheets for asbestos replacements and new installations which need heat isolation. Much safer and possible to buy from any building supply store

    5. Re:Safr place for your safe by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Probably better when you don't know how cleanly it'll be handled, yes. But ceramic still doesn't have the insulative factor of asbestos -- it's absolutely amazing. Wonder if you can get asbestos embedded in the ceramic??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  239. Safe Deposit Box by Mr_Person · · Score: 2

    I was thinking about the same questions a while ago and came up with a solution that I think is pretty good. Once a month I make a backup of my fileserver on a CD-R, then I drop it off at my safe deposit box. I keep about 5 months back just in case. The advantage to using the safe deposit box is that it doesn't cost anything (I already had the box), it's close by (better than mailing), and the bank gets to worry about security, fire-proofing, etc. instead of me.

  240. a big wooden box... in a big warehouse by schuss42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    i've got a box at "public storage" for extra household junk, christmas lights, the styrofoam that my tv came in... all sorts of good crap. it's a big wooden crate stacked up in a climate-controlled, secure warehouse. i have the padlock key that locks it up - i mailed the other to my sister, and keep an unmarked spare. plus i need to present my id each time. i can have access to it on a few hours notice 6 days a week. since i already had it, seemed like a good place for backups.

    i chose CD-R, cause
    (a) they're cheap enough that i don't feel guilty backing up *everything*
    (b) i burn a new one each time, and keep the old ones in there, in case the august file is corrupt, the july one might not be, etc.
    (c) they're not that big, and file nicely.
    (d) if you buy decent ones, they have a good shelf life.

    one other note of offsite storage - a disk cataloger app, so i can figure out what i've got in storage *before* i go down there!

  241. I just encode my data into porn pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then upload them to various erotica newsgroups.

    Let the geeks of the world keep my data safe!

  242. step zero is to decide what to back up. by twitter · · Score: 2
    No, really, figure out what's important. There are only two things I worry about preserving through a fire at home. Pictures and projects. The most important pictures, I give to relatives and people who'd like to look at them. The most important projects can be brought to another location, like your office or a safte deposit box. The best projects are things I'd like to share anyway, so once again publication rules. All the rest of it can go up in smoke.

    For me, if it's not worth sharing, it's not worth worrying about. Bills, records, mass produced crap can all be replaced with a reasonable home insurance policy. If you've taken the trouble to present things to others, it's going to be some of your best work. Interestingly enough, publication aids survival.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  243. What I do by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 4, Funny

    My carefully laid out program for backing up my data consists of these two steps:
    1. If I have no space left on any harddisk, burn some of it to a CD.
    2. Ehhh... ok, not two steps...

  244. Backup to /. by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    or more interesting.. get the "snow" steganography program.. it (somehow -- still blows my mind) inserts binary into text using whitespace encoding. you can insert your gpg'd tarballs into spoofed journal entries created with the Sugar Plum junk HTML generator. You even have built-in timestamps!

    Of course, they may only keep the last 25 comments... hmm... it still seems like all this could be easily scripted with perl.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  245. Burial? by kiltedtaco · · Score: 1

    This just makes me want to go bury some CD-R's in a wood. Reminds me of cryptonomicon. Anyone got any tips for data burial?

  246. Note to IBM'ers by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    And there should be plenty in here. We all have corporate-sponsored (and backed up) Intranet webdrives on reserved under our Intranet names with sharing ACLs tied to bluepages. I have stored gigs up there. You can also get a GSA drive on the Intranet that starts you off with 10GB of space. All officially supported and useful for storing copies of critical data in case a taxi runs over your Thinkpad.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  247. Secure AND Private AND Destructible by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sometimes in business, especially military and intelligence business,
    it is important to have your data be Secure, both in the "eyes only" sense and in
    the "safe from fire/flood/earthquake/mayhem/attack" sense.
    However, it is also very often important that this data be surely and accountably
    DESTROYED. These two seemingly oppositional goals must really make for
    interesting practices in some environments. I need backups, and I also
    need a way to guarantee that all backups are destroyed on command as well, because,
    while the data is to be disposed of, it is not to be
    disposed of until the order is given, at which point, it
    must be disposed of, let's say, with the consequences being
    court-martial or summary execution if it doesn't happen.
    (I'n not just thinking about the kind, gentle, USAn military
    here :-)

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  248. Most important - TEST YOUR BACKUPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been a sysadmin, and I won't stand behind a backup plan that wasn't tested. Best is to try and reconstruct your work and its environment using your backups and only your backups. For example, do you need any special software to read your files? Any special browser or Word plugins? Any particular version of the OS? Got them ALL??? Are you sure?

    BurnedOnce

  249. How about automatic p2p plus offsite backups? by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2

    A safe deposit box, as somebody else mentioned, is a good idea in theory (and potentially in practice - I use one myself). However, the big problem that makes it and so many other backup strategies inadequate in practice is that it requires manual intervention and most people aren't going to use these mechanisms frequently enough. Most of the people I've talked with in small businesses backup maybe once a month (to tape, zip disk, CD, etc), if they're lucky. That's unfortunate because there's really no reason why you should be backing up any less frequently than every day your data changes...

    I've been working on some software for awhile that provides a simple, automated solution. At the core it's peer to peer backup software, so all your computers will backup to each other. To protect against things like fire and theft, it also gives you the option to backup offsite to third party servers. So you could back up the bulk of your data via p2p (very fast, cheap, and easy) and backup your critical stuff offsite (still cheap and easy and potentially fast depending on the amount of data). I have a test version out now and I'm going to be releasing another test version in a few days, so email me if you're interested. And yes, there is a Linux version.

  250. Cheap backup storage by kramit · · Score: 1

    I have found that safety deposit boxes are good safe storage facilities for off site backups, if you can live with the fact that your backups are only available during banking hours.

    I always suggest 2 copies for that reason.

    They tend to run around $35-70/year.

  251. Quasi-Ultimate setup by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

    We're loaded.

    Main box is an Endurance by Marathon, with the tuples split half a mile apart. Not exactly affordable, though.

    As the day grinds along, stuff gets pumped to another rack, located in a concrete bunker under a trailer owned by some guy named "Bob" who works for AT&T. I think he lives in Tulsa or something. Should the world explode, our people can telecommute to it. That's not exactly affordable, either.

    Before we used Bob at AT&T, I had a box in the basement of my house. As above, data transactions & incremental file snapshots were pushed onto it at some interval. That was mostly affordable, since it was effectively just a file store. During the day, my home's 'net connection would be sucked up by this crap. No big deal, I'm at work. When I get home, there's no real data left to push... so the net connection's all mine.

    Along with that, we've got the obligatory 12-tape rotation. The tapes live in my truck most of the time, except for whatever ones will be used that night, and except for whatever monthly set goes to secured storage. Quite affordable, if DDS or DLT etc. is within your budget.

    Stuff at home on my personal boxes... ugh. Snapshot anything of merit onto a Rom, and mail it off to Siberia. Ghost the rest onto a spare drive and store that drive somewhere else...


    The true definition of madness is repeating the same action, over and over, hoping for a different result. - Einstein.
    Einstein never used Windows. - The Mighty Dingus

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  252. the best place for tape and cd media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put all backups in my butt.

    Works Great!!!

  253. The cheapest way to backup your home machine... by danshapiro · · Score: 1

    FTP your key files to your work machine. Encrypted, of course. Sure, you might lose you job, in which case you should switch to some other backup method (you still should keep a copy of the files at home). But for dirt-simple peace of mind, it's hard to beat this. Bear in mind your company's machine use policies etc, of course.

    --
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
  254. For small pieces of data... by strider · · Score: 1

    I'm currently a senior in college writing a thesis. If I don't have a thesis I don't graduate, so as one can imagine I'm kind of paranoid about backups. For small data, I find the following procedurs sufficient:

    1) Burn every single revision to cd
    2) Keep a copy of most recent version in on campus mail box
    3) Keep most recent version on my free web space at yahoo.com (you have to link it, but whatever).
    4) Keep as many revisions as space allows in mailbox on www.runbox.com. They give you 100 megs of storage for a very small price.

    It would be pretty difficult for all my data to get destroyed as it spans two continents and lots of different media. Most personal users have a relatively small ammount of absolutely critical data, and for them I think my solution makes allot of sense. Even for larger data sizes renting space from someone a fair geographic distance away makes sense. Sure their building can burn down to, but what are the odds of their building and yours burning down the same day?

    --
    The preceding passage has been checked for spelling, you will find no sentence without at least one mis spelled word
  255. network backup by dpletche · · Score: 1

    I have a reciprocal agreement with a friend in another city to run remote incremental backups over SSL. On day zero, I created a giant tar file of my entire system, and an XML file containing the MD5 hash and interesting fields from lstat(2) for every file on the system. Every night, a cron job checks that the MD5 fingerprint matches (as a sanity check on the computer and hard drive), and builds a new compressed and encrypted tar file of all changes in the filesystem, excluding anything from a list of regular expressions representing uninteresting transient data. When I get time, I'll also write a script to dump the database nightly and send incremental changes to the backup server. The system is still improving as I get time to futz with it, but I sleep well knowing that I will never lose more than a day's worth of changes to the system, and no manual intervention is required to keep the system running.

  256. Error propagation by xixax · · Score: 2

    But what's your *backup* policy?

    What do you do when you realise that bonehaded mistake has been instantly sychronised across every instance of your data?

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
    1. Re:Error propagation by PD · · Score: 2

      Not possible. Unison will not do that. Have you tried the program? I just type "unison". Not much to screw up there.

      (But I do keep a copy on CD both at work at home, encrypted.)

  257. Crypto, CDs and friends by xixax · · Score: 2
    I use a CD backup script written by a member of the local Linux user group. It creates as many CDs as it takes (filled with ~35 x 20 Mb GPG encrypted .tgzs). Just run it against /home and pop in another blank whenever the drive ejects. Leave encrypted CD set at friend's house. Very simple to use, I can send each new backup set to a different friend.

    Want to know more about it?

    Of course my MP3 collection is quite a bit larger than my /home.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  258. If i told you ... by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

    what I do, how safe is that for me?

    --
    Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
  259. Safe Storage by AutoShade · · Score: 1

    Since 1996 I have kept a copy of my master backups I perform ever so often (all data, programs, config files, etc) at my parents, it saved my a** 2 years ago when all my computer equipment was destroyed by a flood! I label them Set A and Set B, they are exact copies, one in my safe, one many miles away, safe from evrything but nuclear war, or a search warrent :).

  260. BBQ'd hard drives by Reziac · · Score: 2

    In a Previous Article on backups, we discussed the impracticality of the average user backing up a very large HD with anything but another equally large HD.. starting from that premise as our backup method:

    I know of two incidents where a hard disk survived (with data intact) a fire inside the computer's case (one flaming power supply, one flaming modem from a lightning strike). I'd guess data damage may not be so much due to high temperature, as whether the HD receives a thermal shock by being heated too fast, or if gets warped due to being heated too unevenly. A safe might be useful in that it would heat up and cool down relatively slowly and uniformly, so would give the data platters a chance to adapt. (Obviously a stored HD's heads will not be writing data at the time of the theoretical fire, so misread/miswritten data is not the issue.)

    Anyone got a garage, a safe, and a HD they'd care to sacrifice in the interests of science? :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  261. workable solutions? by alizard · · Score: 2
    As for me, it would be a pain in the ass to reload the OS, reinstall the shrinkwrap apps, and remember and download all the utilities I use. I'm doing journalism these days, and the research, notes, and project ideas I've collected over the last 13 years on my HD are simply irreplaceable. What price on a large chunk of my life's work?

    Near-line storage on a HD in a mobile rack. (I paid less than $10 for mine) UNPLUG THE TRAY and put it somewhere else when not actively backing up or restoring. If that $9 power supply suddenly decides to feed your motherboard AC line voltage or your motherboard announces it's got the low-quality electrolytic cap problem by exploding, having your backup HD plugged in at the time is A BAD IDEA.

    Burn a pile of CD-Rs every month (replace with DVD-Rwhatever when the format war ends) and mail them to a friend across the country. If a simultaneous disaster wipes out both locations out, there probably won't be any survivors to care. If security is a concern, PGP-encrypt the disks before sending. (for this, I suggest one-way encryption and try REAL hard to remember the passphrase.)

    I prefer tape, but I've had problems getting backups back from tape. I used to have a Sony Superstation. Data verified perfectly during backups for a year and a half. Worked fine until my HD crashed. After some work with Customer Service, I managed to get about 95% of my files back, but the point behind getting a tape drive is... reload and you're running. While Ecrix or LVO drives are probably sufficiently stable/reliable to trust in, the price tag on either is ... rather high.

    The fireproof safe isn't *that* bad an idea, even if humidity is a concern, just plop your CDs or HD rack in a plastic bag or a sealable metal strongbox with a silica gel packet inside. If the bag or box melts, chances are, your CDs will be melting shortly anyway. But having copies of the data somewhere else is more cost-effective. CD-Rs are cheap. Safes aren't.

    The people who have their backups stored only a few miles away are gambling. Most areas have their own characteristic set of major disasters. I live in an earthquake zone. Others live in areas where hurricanes are popular. No coastal area is immune to tsunamis, even if this is a once-in-a-lifetime or longer scenario, "this only happens once in a long while" doesn't help if that's NOW. Areas that are considered seismically stable can become otherwise. Most people go through their lifetimes without having their homes or businesses burn down. Is this a reason to neglect fire insurance?

    Online backup via commercial storage facility is only a reasonable solution for broadband users. Imagine retrieving even a 20G zipfile via dialup. I get 4667 cps on a *good* connection. You're also betting that the network connect between wherever you are and wherever your backup is will stay intact in the event of a major disaster. I'll assume anyone reading this is encrypting before sending the data out using your own crypto software, not theirs to remove the issue of trust. If you're figuring on retreiving the data via Fed Ex, why not simply send the disks? Note that if the problem is enterprise class, then making backups at 2 or more of the major facilities (out of courtesy, I'll assume redundant backbone connections at each site) on the network becomes reasonable.

    Incomplete... (Score:1)
    by Distan on Thursday November 21, @04:15PM (#4726118)
    (User #122159 Info)

    Your data backup isn't complete unless you could be up and running after having all of your computer equipment seized, your safety deposit boxes frozen, and search warrants served on all of your known friends and family members.

    Maybe there is some sort of "off-shore" backup service in business?

    Distan is right, but I haven't come up with a good answer for how to handle his problem. It isn't possible to rent a storage space from a regular storage space provider on a cash only - no ID basis anymore, at least not around here, and if a manager of such a facility is corruptible enough to do business against the rules, can he be trusted with your data? I don't mean not to read it, I mean to have the disks when you call for them. If the guy's a friend of yours, that's the "known associate" problem.

    If the government (yours, wherever you are) comes up with a sufficiently plausible excuse, they can get the government local to wherever your backup records are to seize them from whoever they're stored with if one, so international isn't a really adequate solution.

    Who's got some better ideas?

  262. No problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just keep my backups at my hotsite, with a point-to-point T1 between my house and... oh, wait.. thats just a pipe dream. ;-)

    Seriously, a safety deposit box at your local bank (or another branch, assuming you're closer than that 6.5 miles someone mentioned) is probably sufficient. As to "will discovery" and my heirs (brother & sister, and the nephews, since my parents certainly don't need the money), face it... if I'm friggin *DEAD* I really don't think my only semi-computer-literate family is really going to want my copies of hi-tech software. And the CD's of my digital pictures and such... well, if they have to wait, they have to wait. *I* certainly am not going to be worried about it at that point.

  263. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Interesting re the CDRWs. I wondered about their durability; this does not sound good.

    How about if CDRWs are used as single-write CDs, never rewritten? how long can they be expected to last?

    I've got a client who bought CDRW blanks by mistake (way too long ago to return 'em), and I could not convince him to spend more money on CDR blanks. Lacking better options, I did his backups on the CDRW blanks, but as closed single-session like one would for CDRs. (No idea if they're still rewritable, but the object was to prevent 'em from being altered, if possible. I don't use CDRW blanks myself so don't really know if it worked.)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  264. Encrypted, Bootable ISO backups? by JavaJoint · · Score: 1
    I'm in the middle of backing up ~100gb's of a few home machines to CD-R (fair bit of digital photography, lots of old email, sentimental stuff, etc.) A long overdue project. Two copies of each CD - each file on the CD MD5-compared against the filesystem. Problem is, I don't want the second copy to leave my control.

    Something I'm not seeing mentioned enough in this thread is: Encryption.

    Going forward, I want to give a copy to a friend or relative. BUT... I want:

    • bootable - Linux preferably...something preconfig'ed so that I can go to my friends house, boot off the CD, and have all the tools right there to unencrypt/deal with the rest of the CD(s). If I have to work with Mother-in-Law's brain-damaged Win XP box, I'm willing to give up 20 meg or so off each CD to be assured of some tools.
    • encrypted - some of the passphrase is a core password I remember, and some of it is derived from something unique about each CD (I don't like the thought of ~50-odd cd's based on the same passphrase)

    The notion of having personal data floating around in the open is less than comforting. For example: What if your friend/relative gets burglarized? Sure, you trust your friend, but by giving them clear files, your data is now subject to THEIR firewall, and THEIR physical security (in addition to yours). Seems like this leads to a GREATER chance that someone untrusted will get access to your files.

    Has anyone combined a sort of bare-bones Linux boot, gpg/tar, ISO creating/burning, cataloging project? hmmm... Might be interesting to have critical stuff on a business-card sized CDR.

    1. Re:Encrypted, Bootable ISO backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A wonderful program to make a bootable CD recovery system is mkCDrec.
      http://mkcdrec.ota.be/
      Yery nice way to rebuild a box from bare metal quickly. Yery nice, free.

  265. saving your data by berkut1337 · · Score: 1

    i don't care if my hosue is flooded, burned down, or blown up, at least my porn is safe

  266. Carnivore handles my ..err...I meant by RoC+MasterMind · · Score: 1

    I archive and compress my critical files, then encrypt & sign them with PGP, then upload them over FTP to a remote FTP site that I trust.

  267. Paranoia. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2
    At my company, we have a network operations center (NOC) that sports about 100,000 dollars worth of hardware on 8 racks. This is all inside an unmarked brick room with strong metal doors at the center of the main building. The racks are raised 18 inches off the ground in case of flood. They have an angled roof with ducts to drain any water that might spill from above. The room is temperature controlled and kept at a constant 60 degrees. An industrial-strength chemical fire protection system, similar to a fire extinguisher but on a much larger scale, will emit a large amount of foam-like material to put out a fire if one occurs. This exists throughout the building and includes the NOC.

    Only the two admins who have the root passwords, and the company CEO, have the keys to this facility.

    Three copies of incremental backups are made each day on CD-R discs. Generally, the backup takes up a single disc. If large changes have taken place, a second disc may be required, but this is very rare. The first copy is placed on a shelf located in the room. Its purpose is the fast retrieval of files in the event of deletion. The second copy goes home with one of the sysadmins. (The sysadmins take turns each day.) The third copy goes home with the company CEO. To reduce the number of CD-Rs stored, three copies of full backups are made on the 12th day of each month, or the following business day. (Don't ask me why that day was selected.) Each of these three copies can take up to 17 CD-Rs, and the number is growing slowly. One copy is kept in the NOC. One is placed in a safe-deposit box at a bank. One is taken home by the company CEO.

    Additionally, a "backup" system exists at a separate location, also protected, which cost the company approximately $20,000. It is similar to the "real" setup and can perform the same functions but on a smaller scale. If the main system is destroyed for whatever reason, the company can activate the backup system within a matter of minutes to provide interim services while the main system is brought back online. When the main system is taken offline for maintainence, all operations take place through the backup system. Additionally, tests are performed once a month (by switching to the backup system) to ensure that it works properly. The two systems are synchronized before and after each such switch.

    Obviously, my company has taken the paranoid approach to protecting data.

  268. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Sheetrock · · Score: 2
    For what it's worth, I've got a couple of three-year-old CD-RW backups that are still readable today that I made side-by-side with CD-R at the time to test them out. I've heard recent CD-RWs are more reliable, but as I mentioned I've had one experience too many with supposedly-good backup media failing on restore because it was pushed well beyond its limits.

    Based on my extremely small experience with CD-RWs for medium-term backup, I'd trust the backup. At least, I'd trust it enough in a situation where I'd advised a client to put out another, say, $40 or so to alleviate risk and he refused my suggestion. I've heard some early (first-gen?) CD-RWs were unreliable to the point where they wrote fine, read fine, then a week later lost a bunch of data. I've heard recently here on Slashdot that a fellow who made his own TiVo type unit that could dump VCDs to CD-RW got something like 3-7 writes before the media got unacceptably screwy.

    It's probable the backups you did will be just fine. Personally, I'd rely on them no more than a year or so if they were pristine and kept away from light and cigarette smoke, and I wouldn't reuse them for backups at the end, but this is just gut feeling. If made properly (and hopefully burned at slower than max speed, like 1X-4X), they'll last much longer, but the manufacturers muck too much with the composition of the things to permit me any real feeling of reliability even with a particular brand.

    The blanks you've made are rewritable, but the user has to choose to blank the disc first, so it isn't likely someone is just going to drop the disc in the tray and blithely dump a new session over the backup.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  269. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Reziac · · Score: 2

    In looking at the media, CDRW *look* like they're denser. And I've noticed that the less-transparent and more solidly-backed CDRs read faster in old hardware (enough to notice), probably due to stronger reflectivity. So my initial thought was that CDRW media *should* be more reliable/more readable -- but I've had strange experiences with trying to write CDRWs (lots of fails for no good reason, whereas CDRs rarely fail -- in fact the Plextor *never* failed until TurboTax forcibly installed IE5.5, which FUBAR'd lots of stuff incl. the CDRW).

    The guy I made the backup for didn't have the first clue how to use the CDRW (older Sony, of somewhere around the 6x era), so one can hope that he won't try something silly like writing over his backup! The disk read just fine immediately after, which I suppose is a good sign. I'll probably be doing his next backup in due course, and I can simply refuse to write over the old one :)

    In my experience, given good quality blanks, data that fades in the next few weeks or months is an early symptom of a CDRW unit that's going tits-up. Have had enough evil adventures with failing Yamaha drives (never again!) to be fairly well convinced of that.

    For myself, I just have too much data -- CDRs get silly in a hurry. Have been thinking about a RAID1 server with no mission in life except to mirror my other machines. I suppose I could string power and a network cable to my shop building and put it out there, under the theory that house and shop aren't likely to burn down at the same time :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  270. Message To the GET A GRIP crowd by bushboy · · Score: 1

    Some replies, admittedly funny, have ranted about home data being pretty much useless.

    HOW THE HELL DO YOU KNOW THAT ?

    Just because YOU don't do anything productive on your home network, it doesn't mean that all of us do.

    GET A GRIP YOURSELVES

    What if this dude was a freelance programmer working from home, on a sixth month project that would basically feed/clothe him and his family for the next year ?

    Or a freelance Graphic designer running a SOHO business ?

    Some of you are such damn Nerds you assume that nobody elses home data is worth shit, because yours isn't. Bunch of ignorant dweebs.

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  271. Re:500GBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got 500 GBs of (private) dynamic data you need to backup on a regular basis???

    You, sir, need a life, not a backup solution. //J

  272. Re:"JAYSYN" SOUNDS LIKE A QUEER'S NAME, KNOBGOBLIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    o|t-s- - -s-t- - s.o
    |f GOD ||
    t |t HATES PEOPLE ||
    ss|WHO HATE PEOPLE||
    || _ _ _ _ o _ _ ||
    t ' - o -s. t -t- -s'
    t s| | o _|/
    o s s | |s t" ".
    oo f | f /(o)-(o)\
    t s /_)fo /s |
    f o s |s)|s '- o
    t \_o|\ '.o_s.' / |\/ft
    o f | |f\ \_/ / _|so'/
    o t f|_|\ f.t__s/ \f) /
    f t t \ \_/\_o/\__ o|s=|
    fft \ f /\ s\ `\ | |
    o s f \ \\o/ s \| |
    s st `\ /\ | o/ |
    ; || f |\____/
    t s o |fs|| |

  273. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  274. My own personal form of backup by goldcd · · Score: 1

    is encrypting all my personal data into a file called 'Britney_sucking_off_donkey.avi' and popping it in my Kazaa shared folder. Millions of copies distributed around the world in hours.

  275. Oldest way is the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Keep an electronic backup in any media and place you think is safe enough for 95% of the cases of data-loss. This will give you an easy way of restoring your data. After all your house might burn/flood once or twice in your lifetime.

    2) To be covered for extreme cases, print everything out
    and keep them in a fire/water-proof safe. Paper wont burn inside the safe and humidity wont destroy it. I assume the
    paper and print method play a role in this scenario. e.g. paper should be very thin to save space and priting sould be done at least on lazer printer. This way you can always restore your data, it will just take a longer time.

    Method 2 will also work if you want to save binary data,
    as long as you print them in hexadecimal format :P

  276. Safe Deposit Box at bank is perfect by CrudPuppy · · Score: 1

    just large enough to keep a nice litle stack of CD's (or even a ghosted HDD in a metallic bag)

    --
    A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.
  277. Data backup with a laptop by shrewtamer · · Score: 1

    I find keeping my data backed up with a laptop is fairly easy. I guess you'll need hard drives to suit your needs and conveniance. My laptop is almost always as safe as I am. It also goes almost everywhere with me - this is where the backup comes in. When I'm at friends houses I back my stuff up on to their computers. Ok this process is not rigorously controlled - all my friends *might* decide to reformat their disks the same day I loose my data - but I loose less sleep over this than over those damm shrews.

  278. Hire a CBCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, anyone with any intellegence would simply perform regular backups and store them offsite. Oh yeah, unless you test these backups by loading them on a recovery system then they are worthless. You have to prove the backups are capable of recovery. I'd hire a disaster recovery coordinator...

  279. Safe Deposit Box by casmithva · · Score: 1

    When I do full backups, I do 'em twice. The first copy goes into our safe at home, and the second copy goes into our safe deposit box at the bank down the street. Incremental backups done during the week only go in the safe; I don't have time to go to the bank every day. I've seen other customers from time to time come into the bank with a box full of tapes -- either their business backups or just protecting their porn collection. :)

  280. NFPA standard 232 by haligan · · Score: 1

    1.) If you are using a media fireproof safe in the US make sure it is certified by UL or any other US testing laboratory. You may have a problem with your insurance company if the safe is not up to US standards. 2.) The National Fire Protection Association has standard 232 Provides requirements for records protection equipment and facilities and record-handling techniques that provide protection from the hazards of fire. 3.) Something to remember. When you see that a safe, door or wall is rated for say 2 hours, the intent is to give you 2 hours of protection until someone notices the fire and calls the Fire Department, the sprinkler system activates and extinguishes or controls the fire until the FD arrives or the fire goes undiscovered and hopefully the fire burns itself out or otherwise say goodbye to your backups. Fireproof safes are rated the same way. So, if you have a safe rated for 45 minutes, make sure there is adequate fire suppresion or the facility is staffed 24 hours 7 days a week. Haligan

  281. Replication + Tape Library by JeffVolc · · Score: 1

    The few important documents I have (all of a few megs) and the much more important family pictures (of the kids growing up & stuff) off the digital camera are always on more than one machine. Usually I download my pictures to my main PC and then dump them to my linux server over samba. The linux server runs Martain's Photoframe which is the best/easiest web-based photo gallery software I have used. But I'm getting OT now so back to the topic...

    Attached to the linux server is an Exabyte tape library with 10 tapes (thanks Ebay). Every night I backup the whole server except ISO images and MP3s. Each day of the week uses a different tape automatically with sunday being tape 1 and saturday tape 7. I wrote a custom script for using mtx to change the tape based on day of the week, then tar to backup, then tar again to verify, then mtx to unload.

    Before an upgrade (every 6 months or so with Redhat/now Mandrake 9) I also do a special backup to tape 10 after doing a cleaning tape.

    So to sum it up... important data is always on more than one machine and backups are always done daily with more than one tape.

    I should run tape 10 over to my in-laws for safe keeping though. I have been more worried about a harddrive crash (especially with one year warrenties now) than fire. Flood is not an issue if you saw street I climb when returning from work you would agree.

    Jeff

  282. I backup online... by armyturtle · · Score: 1

    Streamload.com has UNLIMITED storage online for FREE. You are limited to what you can download under the free account. I pay $4.95 and get 1000MB download per month. Not bad considering if my house goes up in smoke I still have my data somewhere.

    --
    Wherever you go, there you are. :D
  283. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by peter · · Score: 2

    > So my initial thought was that CDRW media *should* be more reliable/more readable.

    CDRs have ~0.8 or 0.9 times the contrast of a pressed CD. CDRWs have ~0.6 or 0.7 times the contrast. They're harder for non-Multiread hardware to deal with.

    --
    #define X(x,y) x##y
    Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  284. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Interesting. Tho I'd guess it varies much more radically for CDRs -- as I've noted, the ones that are more opaque (better backing, more visible reflectivity) read considerably faster in old hardware. Enough to really notice in a 4x.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?