Slashdot Mirror


Wal-Mart Lindows PCs Selling Well

andyring writes "CNN.com is reporting that sales of the $199 PCs have exceeded expectations. Although CNN terms them "full fledged, if low power," it seems customers don'd mind all that much if their computer does not run Windows and doesn't carry an Intel processor. Slashdot covered two reviews of those machines July 4."

665 comments

  1. Guess we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess we all know who bought them :)

  2. imagine a.... by Rastan_B2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    .NET cluster of these....

  3. hey maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Hey maw lookie here, theyza penguin on our cumpyoota tv. How come aol dont work? it works on Leroys maw.

    1. Re:hey maw!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's this? Herbert Kornfeld on the internet?

  4. And in Europe? by colaco · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Now i want to see those computers in Europe!

    Why the things here are so much expensive than in the US?

    1. Re:And in Europe? by anonymous+coword · · Score: 1, Informative

      Since USD and EUR are currently almost the same value as each other, they should retail for 199 EUR. Anything more and your getting ripped off. Now I havent seen any pc sold for that price in the UK (£249 is the lowest I've seen, which is about 400 EUR). If they can retail something like that in this price I WOULD be impressed!

    2. Re:And in Europe? by jakedata · · Score: 1

      VAT (Value Added Tax)

    3. Re:And in Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Socialism

    4. Re:And in Europe? by dbrutus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually that would be $199 before VAT (which averages about 22%). Also the higher costs of doing business in Europe mean that prices should be a little higher (snobbism costs money).

    5. Re:And in Europe? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

      Because euros subject themselves to taxes even an American you choke at (but dont worry were catching up on this side of the pond very quickly).

      --
    6. Re:And in Europe? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dont think 22% is "a little higher", but thats the problme many people have they never stop to look at how much more they have to work to support a government..

      --
    7. Re:And in Europe? by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      In the US all prices do not include sales tax. It's about 8% in most places which is still half the VAT in most of Europe. It's just the American way. They give you a low price then nickel and dime you with extra charges. You'd be lucky to just pay the 8% sales tax. The last time I rented a car the total taxes and surcharges were >50% of the base price (they like to stick the out-of-towners with the bill for the sports stadium).

    8. Re:And in Europe? by shepd · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Why the things here are so much expensive than in the US?

      Because, for whatever reason it is, people in europe have traditionally let companies, big and small, walk all over them. Or so it seems to a Canadian who has made various trips to the UK.

      If you just quit buying anything that's more expensive than it is in North America, you'd get your prices down.

      But, for some reason, I see amazing amounts of people in England driving cars that cost nearly twice as much as they do in America, or at least they are including taxes in the UK. Example: Base Corolla in Canada: $15 290 CDN or $18 645 CDN with taxes. Base Corolla in UK: 10 795 GBP [with or without taxes, I'm not sure what your laws are there] ($26 514 CDN). This applies to almost all other vehicles I've seen over there.

      It's simple: Buy used until the retailers get their prices back down to earth. Buying smaller doesn't help because it doesn't send the right message. Just don't buy new. That will send the message.

      Oh well... I know that won't happen. I remember how most of the cars in the UK were shiny new compared to the ones in Canada, and especially the US.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    9. Re:And in Europe? by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      most online sales you dont pay tax on... But since walmart.com has a presence in almost every state they can get away with charging us sales tax even though they dont carry these computers in stores, Only online. What a crock of shit... SHipping plus sales tax! what a rip off.

    10. Re:And in Europe? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      If you can shop in Oregon or Montana, and possibly New Jersey, or if your online seller has no presence in your state you can skip out on the sales tax. Mail order houses only have to collect taxes if they have a corporate owned office in the state their customers are in, that is why most big bricks and morter companies set up a subsidiary company to handle online sales.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    11. Re:And in Europe? by pyros · · Score: 2

      You're supposed to take it upon yourself to pay state sales tax for online purchases. I've seen some online retailers (Megahaus in TX) charge sales tax if the shipping address is in the same state as them.

    12. Re:And in Europe? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I think cars are cheap in Canada because while there are many assembly plants there, there isn't a car company located there with enough influence to get a tariff put on imports. There are quite a few folks around here who head up to Canada to buy a car, the local dealers get pretty mad when they want local warantee work though.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    13. Re:And in Europe? by grid+geek · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      I'd disagree - I'm on a long term contract in the US from the UK and have found that the number of extra charges etc which get included raise the US prices to about the same in Europe. The prices quoted in the UK are the total cost, the ones in the US don't take into account taxes etc.

      Because, for whatever reason it is, people in europe have traditionally let companies, big and small, walk all over them. Or so it seems to a Canadian who has made various trips to the UK.

      Your joking! Compared to the US?

      Taxes aren't necessarily higher in Europe than the US but the level of labour rights is far higher and for most places even minimum wage provides a high enough income to live. Contrast this with the US where minimum wage is a joke.

      Cars are a special case - old cars cost more to run than new cars, new cars tend to be more fuel efficient (which with gas prices in Europe is a good thing). And if you're from the UK the level of rain and salty rain especially means cars just don't last as long as ones in places like California.

    14. Re:And in Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: Socialism.
      Thats also why in the UK the firefighters go on strike, the teachers are striking, the trains strike every week, oh, and the post-office has been on strike (it rotates around) for 20 years.

      Sure you get free healthcare, but you're still paying for it.

    15. Re:And in Europe? by C14L · · Score: 1

      Socialism

      Right! In the US there is real poverty, so they need real low-cost computers. In Europe we have social welfare and everybody has a guaranteed living standart. So there is no need for computers that cheep.

      *SCNR* A stupid comment deserves a stupid answer, right?!

    16. Re:And in Europe? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I'd disagree - I'm on a long term contract in the US from the UK and have found that the number of extra charges etc which get included raise the US prices to about the same in Europe. The prices quoted in the UK are the total cost, the ones in the US don't take into account taxes etc.

      Could be. All I know is what toyota tells me, and they quoted me a price with all special taxes included (which I did note for comparison). It was still many thousands of dollars less than the UK price.

      >Cars are a special case - old cars cost more to run than new cars, new cars tend to be more fuel efficient (which with gas prices in Europe is a good thing). And if you're from the UK the level of rain and salty rain especially means cars just don't last as long as ones in places like California.

      Well, I'm talking about Canada. Our cars rust faster than those in the UK due to salt being applied directly to the roads 4 months a year (more in many places). Still, more used cars here.

      >Taxes aren't necessarily higher in Europe than the US but the level of labour rights is far higher and for most places even minimum wage provides a high enough income to live. Contrast this with the US where minimum wage is a joke.

      Yes, but because money goes so much further in America, minimum wage can be lower. You should check the UK minimum wage. I think you'll find it's actually only a few pennies higher than the US one (or at least it was a few years ago, IIRC).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    17. Re:And in Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you get free healthcare, but you're still paying for it.

      It MUST be "free" the government pays for it. :)

    18. Re:And in Europe? by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      Real poverty with 2% unemployment, healthcare and retirement benefits even for the guy who flips burgers at the local McD's.

      I believe you. (/sarcasm) I think you need to stop reading the Guardian. The US is not the root of all evil, and believe it or not, MOST Americans share in major prosperity. The problem is that newspapers only highlight negative news. It's the same thing, we only hear about the bad shit that goes down in Europe. If I went on reports, I'd probably believe Europe was a hellhole. However, I lived there, so I know better.

      And proudly biased papers LOOK actively for every vestige of negative news. It's the old saying, "The escaped inmate who looks for a prison guard is bound to find him."

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    19. Re:And in Europe? by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      "a little higher" was my SE european try at british understatement. Frankly I think that the VAT is one of the biggest reasons the EU is doomed to be an also ran (at best). Hiding taxation leads to higher taxation, honesty is the best policy and all that.

    20. Re:And in Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's your open tag?

    21. Re:And in Europe? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I know that this is totally offtopic, and that I will lose what small amount of karma I have for it, but I have a friend who made a business out of the US/Canada price difference. Wholesalers would go to Canada and buy truckloads, then give them to him to change out the component cluster to read miles, not kms. He charges close to US$1000 per car, if I remember, and after the cost of the new cluster made some US$100 per car, in about 15 minutes. (This is all from memory of a couple years ago). The wholesalers would then turns around and wholesale the cars at a US$4000 markup, making about US$3000 per car, and go right back up to Canada to do it again. These guys had money falling out of their pockets.

    22. Re:And in Europe? by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Hmm no...

      Taxation is just about the same for a working stiff. Europe tends to spend it's tax dollars on healthcare, welfare and education the US prefers corporations, welfare and defence.

      With the current US administration focusing so much on defence and corporate bail outs the next administration is going to have to raise more taxes.

      Boston Tea party was over a 2% tax as I recall, my, how far the US has come. Still the US does have a brand spanking new Dept. of Homeland Security. Even old Poindexter got employed, who says felons can't get good jobs?

    23. Re:And in Europe? by websaber · · Score: 1

      Right on. I love how everybody talks about american poverty and yet the whole world wants to immigrate here. Yes in america you have to start at the bottom but how many people become succesfull with time. You don't get your guaranteed standard of living but you do get endless possibilities. America is the land of Star Trek... it has it's problems but the future is always seems so much brighter.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    24. Re:And in Europe? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      first of all, the boston tea party was about a tax imposed by a foreign power, and not a local (or federal) govt.

      second of all, you list corporate bailouts and defence as two seperate entities...

      and... if you think poindexter was bad, what do you think of kissinger?

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    25. Re:And in Europe? by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      From memory (haven't worked there in a while), direct taxation is quite low in Europe, at least in France. My tax bill was about 8% of my income.

      VAT is not the whole story.

    26. Re:And in Europe? by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Mhmm... well, if New England was a british colony, then wasnt the tea tax a Federal tax then?

      Or Hawaiians and Alaskans are not subject to pay US Federal taxes?

      Nothing against the Tea Party (although it was a strange way to start an independence war), but your logic doesnt hold water.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    27. Re:And in Europe? by C14L · · Score: 1

      Ahm, C0LDFusion, did you read the part after the "*SCNR*" in my original post?

    28. Re:And in Europe? by C0LDFusion · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but the way you phrased it sounded much like the vapid citizens of the EU who constantly act like 90% of the US is on the streets while the top 10% is easy pimpin' out of big suites and using the botton 90% as sex slaves for goatse experiments.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    29. Re:And in Europe? by Dunkalis · · Score: 1

      The taxes levied by the British Parliament in the pre-revolution days were mainly for raising money for regulating trade and such. The Americans had no problem with this. However, after the French and Indian War (known as the Seven Years War in Europe), the British government needed money for its treasury, and they began taxing the Americans, because Parliament believed that this was payment for defense of the English colonies. The Americans fought the war in North America pretty independently of Britan. This was why we protested the taxes.

      Thats getting off-topic, so I'm going to say: The sales of these computers is great. It shows there IS a market for Linux, contrary to what many have said.

      --
      Slashdot is a waste of time. I enjoy wasting time.
    30. Re:And in Europe? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      my argument may not hold wateer, but not for the reasons you said.

      better examples would be Washington DC, Guam and puerto rico - protectorates, taxed, yet no representation.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    31. Re:And in Europe? by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Funny

      >90% of the US is on the streets while the top
      >10% is easy pimpin' out of big suites and using
      >the botton 90% as sex slaves for goatse
      >experiments.

      Uh, it *is* something like that. If you look at how well-off those 10% actually are, the difference between the living of the 90% and a herd of goats is statistically insignificant.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    32. Re:And in Europe? by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      "first of all, the boston tea party was about a tax imposed by a foreign power, and not a local (or federal) govt."

      Well, at the time, that "foreign power" was the lawful authority governing the colonies. That government had a standing army in the colonies and carried the force of law. It was recognized in the international community as having sovreignty over the colonies in America.

      When the colonies rebelled and waged war against England, they were taking on the lawful authority of their own government, not a foreign power as you say. The sitting government was completely intolerable, and totally unable to manage the colonies at a 4 month remove, and the revolutionary cause ran deep enough that entire MILITARY DIVISIONS were influenced to take up arms against their command (necessary for revolution, and the single missing ingredient today).

      But England did not become a Foreign Power until AFTER the revolution...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    33. Re:And in Europe? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Since were burning karma one of our econ texts had a story about a couple who lived close enough to the border to make regular trips up would arb the exchange rate. They would buy a sack of quarters at the canadian price, and then break the coin wrappers and wrap them with mostly American quarters. They would then take their mixed quarters and trade them in at the bank for US dollars. Anyway they were sorta hippies and their cost of living was low, and between this and a small farm they met all their expenses. Its sorta amazing what people will think up to benefit themselves.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    34. Re:And in Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      While if you work and live in Sweden, they will slap a 28-33% tax on your income, and you still have a 25% VAT on most goods. Muahahahaa the government takes back >50% of what I earn and I still have potholes in the road outside and have to wait for medical care.

    35. Re:And in Europe? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      LindowsOS PCs at Evesham Micros - a UK based computer manufacturer. Current price is £249.99 inc vat.

      800mhz Via Eden CPU, 256mb RAM, 40GB HDD, v92 modem.

      Tim

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    36. Re:And in Europe? by orcrist · · Score: 1

      But since walmart.com has a presence in almost every state they can get away with charging us sales tax even though they dont carry these computers in stores...

      Ummm... what does Walmart gain by charging sales tax? At best they're just passing it along to the state, at worst it's more paperwork for them.

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    37. Re:And in Europe? by rogerzilla · · Score: 1

      That's mainly due to company cars, a peculiarly British concept which was kicked off by a left wing Labour government in the 1970s - they tried to limit incomes in a period of high inflation, so companies started giving their employees cars instead. Unfortunately the habit has never died out which explains why so many people drive (comparatively) large cars and don't care about speed humps, washing them or checking the oil. it just isn't their problem.

    38. Re:And in Europe? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      And if you compare the standard of living of the 90% and India, China, Most of south and Central America, Most of africa, and the better part of south-west asia, the Difference is staggering. For example: Your McD's Burger flipper working full time Makes more than the sum of the bottom 90% of some South american countries.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    39. Re:And in Europe? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Puerto Rico is a bad example. They like the situation as is. Also, each of those while not having a full floor vote do participate in floor and committee discussions, and get committee votes.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    40. Re:And in Europe? by benzapp · · Score: 1

      The sitting government was completely intolerable, and totally unable to manage the colonies at a 4 month remove, and the revolutionary cause ran deep enough that entire MILITARY DIVISIONS were influenced to take up arms against their command (necessary for revolution, and the single missing ingredient today).

      This is of course why the vast majority of our army is stationed over seas. It would be very easy for the military to organize as a revolutionary army if they were all within US borders. But, when spread all over the world it is all but impossible to get the critical mass necessary to affect change. Combine that with a general population prevented from owning weapons of war, and revolution is no longer possible.

      I hope that single ingredient is added someday. Revolution will come, its only a matter of time.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    41. Re:And in Europe? by edbarrett · · Score: 1

      If the place you're buying from has a "business presence" in the state you reside in, they're required by law to charge you your state's sales tax. And that goes for dead-tree catalog sales, too. Oh great, I suppose I have to go pull that info out from somewhere now...

      But I'm not gonna. Do a search through the older stuff on "tax" for yourself.

    42. Re:And in Europe? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Mhmm... well, if New England was a british colony, then wasnt the
      > tea tax a Federal tax then? Or Hawaiians and Alaskans are not
      > subject to pay US Federal taxes?

      Hawaii and Alaska each sport two US senators and elect a member of
      the US House of Representatives. The whole stupid war was mostly
      over whether the colonies could be taxed without representation in
      the House of Commons. (There were some other sticking points too...
      but they aren't germaine to this discussion.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    43. Re:And in Europe? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      I beg to differ, states here (not the fed impose a sales tax (8% in erie county NY for example is very high). If someone here proposed a 22% VAT tax there is no way they would get elected. Look at the 1984 Election in which mondale told the people he was going to raise taxes (he lost probably the worst or second worse election in US history).

      The reason Americans put their money twords making buisness happy is because at least 70% of americans work for a buisness, and pay income tax. Personally I would be for eliminating all buisness tax and impsoing tariffs on forign goods (but thats just me)..

      --
    44. Re:And in Europe? by jonadab · · Score: 2

      > In the US there is real poverty

      I hope you are being sarcastic. The poorest of the poor here throw
      food away on a regular basis and waste unconscionable amounts of
      money on things like cable television and fast food. There is
      nothing in the US that even resembles poverty. once told a lady
      in my church that there's no real poverty in the United States, and
      she laughed at me. About a year later, as it happens, she travelled
      to the Cameroon and spent a couple of months there. When she came
      back, she was telling people that we don't have real poverty in the
      US. The third world redefined the word "poverty" for her.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    45. Re:And in Europe? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      Well in the US it greatly depends on what state you live in. The federal rate for me is around 30%, the state rate in NY is around 20% and in my new home Minnesota it seems to be about 10%.

      Now if your in the US and youre smart you incorperate youself (its legal and, imho, ethical) to protect youself not only from taxes but from liability. There is nothing you can do about youre income under this plan (that is income from your job) but you can protect yourself from capitol gains and the death tax on your assets..

      --
    46. Re:And in Europe? by C0LDFusion · · Score: 2

      Uh, it *is* something like that. If you look at how well-off those 10% actually are, the difference between the living of the 90% and a herd of goats is statistically insignificant.

      Just FYI, I am officially in that bottom 90%.

      I own a computer that is too damn fast for what I use it for. I own a laser printer. I also have Creative Labs Audigy Sound Connected to Cerriden-Vega speakers. My bed is highly comfortable and not made of straw. I go to anime conventions (The trips cost $200 even before I enter the door). I own cases of Red Bull, Dr. Pepper, and Arizona Iced Tea. My house features central air and heating and I'm rarely uncomfortable inside. I watch TV on a large widescreen. I play PS2. I also enjoy a large collection of DVDs.


      Damn, wherever you live, the goats are living pretty damn well. Why aren't people crossing the border illegally en masse to take jobs as farm cattle, in order to get "Goat Benefits"?

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    47. Re:And in Europe? by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      You don't understand. You have what you perceive to be a nice living.

      You seem not to comprehend just how much BETTER it is for the 12 guys who own everything. Compared to THEM, we're goats.

      You have some material possessions, and a rough idea where your next meal is coming from. I'm 24 paychecks away from homelessness, myself.

      The point is that you, with your income and posessions, are much, much closer to the guy on the corner with liver cancer begging for pennies to buy malt liquor, than you are to the 10%'er.

      I see you have no problem with that, but, you missed my point.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    48. Re:And in Europe? by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2

      The total level of taxation is about the same having worked in europe for 10+ years and the US for 6+. Sales tax is a small part of the equation, although the US seems to tax everything with sales tax and europe is more selective.

      Most Americans do not put their money towards businesses they have it taken by the goverment. The goverment decides where the money is to be distributed. Who pays for politicians to be elected? Who do you think politicans are going to reward for getting them elected?

    49. Re:And in Europe? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      Was Clinton elected by the same industry that elected Bush?? no they reward and punish different industries. When I say we put most money twords buisness I ment because in the end we elect our leaders (if were dumb enough to be led by tv adds (ie not watch the debates), and to never consider a 3rd party we are getting what we deserve, it is not the fault of our government.

      I am tired of people being apathetic about elections, if you can get 20% of those eligable to vote to vote for you youre going to win that simple. Ross perot pulled more than 15% of those who voted in 92, Ventura won the MN governership as a thrid party.

      more on point the highest sales tax in the us (again this is state+county+city because the fed has no sales tax) that I have seen in 8%, I have heard that the highest is 8.5% this is far less than the 22% EU VAT tax. -Regards

      --
    50. Re:And in Europe? by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      That's entirely my point. Direct taxation hurts, it makes people stand up and force their govt. to be accountable for all the foolish things they wast taxpayer money on. Indirect, especially hidden, indirect taxation isn't as painful and allows for greater boondoggles, greater fraud, and greater abuse.

      EU nations (in general) have a higher tax take overall than the US. I wish it were different.

    51. Re:And in Europe? by Abreu · · Score: 2

      You are absolutely right... I should have mentioned Guam, Puerto Rico, or the US Virgin Islands instead.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    52. Re:And in Europe? by C14L · · Score: 1

      You don't understand. You have what you perceive to be a nice living.

      Yeah, right! You only think you're happy, but you are not! (Grandpa Simpson)

      SCNR
    53. Re:And in Europe? by jonadab · · Score: 2
      > I should have mentioned Guam, Puerto Rico, or the US > Virgin Islands instead.

      Residents of those places don't pay money to the IRS. (Well, the Virgin Islands at least; I imagine the others are handled in a similar fashion.) They have to meet certain qualifications to be considered residents, of course, such as actually living there, and they do pay taxes, but not to the US Federal Government. See for example here.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    54. Re:And in Europe? by Artifex · · Score: 2
      Since USD and EUR are currently almost the same value as each other, they should retail for 199 EUR. Anything more and your getting ripped off.


      You're making an assumption that costs for all the goods and services required to produce the boxes are the same in each country. The costs of things like hard drives and memory might be significantly different, especially if they don't have the same economies of scale as whoever is building the boxes here. Even if all the boxes are built in the same place, like in Korea, you have differentials in shipping costs, differentials in marketing costs, differentials in plain old profit-taking by local distributors. There are also differentials in taxation - I believe VAT has been mentioned by others as the most obvious example, but the EU might have tariffs on some of the components or software, and so might the US, and there's nothing to assure that they'd be identical.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    55. Re:And in Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      price in the US don't include tax!
      in France we have 19,6% VAT, and lot of charges.

  5. Users by captainstupid · · Score: 1

    I'd be interested to know what any slashdot reader who has actually purchased one of these boxes thinks....

    --
    "Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling...." - Abraham Simpson
    1. Re:Users by Jubii · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd be interested to know what any slashdot reader who has actually purchased one of these boxes thinks....

      It doesn't matter what slashdot readers think of them. That's not who they're marketed toward. I think a better question is what your grandma/neighbor/any other non computer saavy person thinks about them.
      --

      I planned on inserting something witty here but never got around to it.
    2. Re:Users by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'd disagree. Slashdot readers are definitely part of the target audience -- someone who is secure enough in their computer knowledge that they don't think they need MS's hand-holding (or shackeling, depending on your point of view).

      Another target user would be the low-budget buyer who isn't willing to put out the extra $100 for an MS license and sees that the boxes do what (s)he wants.

      The third would probably be someone with enough money that 'blowing' $200 to find out about Linux seems entirely worth it.

      I've generally been of the opinion that one of the biggest barriers to general Linux acceptance is the difficulty in finding a box with anything other than MS pre-loaded. Although I find Linux installs easier than Windows installs, it's still a pain in the butt. Most users aren't willing to buy a bare bones system w/ a separate OS and then waste their time on an install while risking being blocked by some odd incompatibility (e.g. not being able to differentiate hardware failure from installer error).

      These Wall Mart boxes are pretty much the first mass-market over-the-counter Linux boxes for the masses. I may have misgivings about Lindows' software practices, but it's definitely nice to see Linux bozes in the aisles this Christmas.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    3. Re:Users by ackthpt · · Score: 2
      Look for FUD from Microsoft expressing miserable experiences with Lindows/Linux in order to protect their sacred cow.

      "Why, ah didn't know the difference and when it didn't presaint me with the qualitah ah expect from those dear ol' gennelmen at Microsoft, why ah was naturally shocked! I tried deseperately to take the horrible machine back, but the man said, 'We don't take those back, and as to your feelings, frankly we don't give a damn!' Wah, ah was close to tears! Then that brave Mr. Gates stomped the awful man into the ground with his Windows XP boots and saved they day and mah honor! I'll nevah switch again!"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Users by websaber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      true. But they also dont mention how much more efficient Linux is to the afformentioned. The $200 dollar Linux machine might seem much faster than the $400 dollar machine that runs "millions" of programs.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    5. Re:Users by nyseal · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you completely. I have posted on slashdot several times now about the 'uncomfortableness' in switching over to Linux from MS because of my lack of knowledge and/or experience with the system. However, now that an inexpensive alternative has presented itself, I may as well give it a shot; hell, what do I have to lose? Besides, I sometimes pay more than $199 just for some of the SOFTWARE I'm using. This marketing and sales function just gave me the kick in the butt I was waiting for to try it out!

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    6. Re:Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I purched an athlon 1800+ with no operating system, and installed WINDOWS 98! I know, user of the dark side and all. It's even a legit copy that I paid for.
      The speakers sucked, and the keyboard was a joke, but you sorta expected that. I tossed my geforce 3ti in there (although the onboard graphics were certainly good enough for everything except new vid games), and have had exactly 0 problems.
      I'm a fairly typical user, I download files, surf some pr0n, play vidgames, and do on call work on it. Very nice little machine.

    7. Re:Users by snowbaII · · Score: 1

      Don't assume all readers of Slashdot are uber nix users, i am a total newbie but still enjoy reading the articles. If they were in Australia i would contemplate buying one.

    8. Re:Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know ...
      I work for fry's electronics (spare me the flame, i dont really give a rats tush if you dont like the store ;) and we sell linux pc's because they are especially cheap

      but ive learned a few things
      1) people are too stupid to mess with linux in any capacity
      2) they'd much rather return them

      the number one reason the GQ machines are returned according to the returns associates is because of linux. Not the cheap hardware, or its unreliability, but linux. Customers just arent willing to put up with the fuss. Besides, who SERIOUSLY just checks their e-mail and web-surfs?

      Try writing documents. uhh does canon work with that beast? doubtful, if at all it would be difficult to configure. so now you've got a linux machine which is incapable of outputting a hard copy of any information on it, great. how about inputting hardcopies of information? scanners? haha ... nice thought. Linux has a great deal of work to do before it's practical on the desktop you know, i dont know why wal-mart seems to be doing so well but here in frys land, not a chance.

  6. No big surprise by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

    People flock to cheap hardware, especially when it's Joe Consumer. Just look how well consoles perform. I have to think it's somewhat related. Now people can actually have computers they can do real "work" with even cheaper than a console. Sounds yummy. Make loverly Christmas presents too for that special someone that still has the last, lone 386 still running.

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
    1. Re:No big surprise by Ferro_Man · · Score: 1

      someone should send one to strong bad for christmas!

      --
      [echelon]
  7. I may seem like a troll for saying this by danny256 · · Score: 5, Troll

    but I bought one of those boxes because it was cheap, formatted and stuck a pirated copy of windows XP on it. I wonder how many other people have done the same thing.

    1. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as long as you're a consenting adults and nobody else gets harmed...

    2. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Whatever floats your boat I suppose. Since no one is trying to sell a service, then probably no ones cares at all. My only question is, "How well does XP run on this box?" Unlike Linux, XP won't just run on anything effectively.

    3. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by mbrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All of them...

      but that is not what is important. At least not to me, it is surely of importance to M$ but not because of the pirated version of XP but because people may start to realize it is possible to buy PC's without Windows on it.

      It is of HUGE significance that PC's are going to be sold at Wal-Mart without Windows period. MS thought they had won this war. Doesn't matter if the setup sux or not. Because if a place as common as Wal-Mart is selling non MS PC's it is a huge deal to them. It is the smart thing to do for Wal-Mart and that is why Wal-Mart rox. They are not afraid to take some chances.

      The big PC dealers all got too lazy to sell PC's without doze. This may get them to rethink that strategy.

    4. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I also may sound like a troll for saying this:

      These things sell well for the same reason that Deer Hunter is a bestselling game and Microsoft became an empire selling Windows:

      For the vast majority of people, price is way more important than quality. If it's cheap and reasonably useable, people will buy it in large numbers.

    5. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by conway · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      If you want to get a cheap computer to install a pirated copy of windows on, its cheaper to build one yourself, or get something from some no-name shop on pricewatch
      The pc's there are cheaper and better than the junk you get at Walmart.
      And you still ended up paying for an operating system -- to Lindows.

      So, I don't think many people will be following your example.
      Although you might make a good example in the M$ vs Lindows suit for the prosecution!

    6. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by frozenray · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More likely, they used Win ME rather than XP if they did such a thing - Joe Sixpack won't be able to bypass the XP activation procedure. I'm actually rather glad Microsoft introduced it - as long as Windows cost essentially the same as Linux (the price of a blank CD-R), people didn't care, now they may be starting to vote with their wallets.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    7. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Wal-Mart - not afraid to take some chances. Wow, that's the most wrong thing anyone's said on here for quite a while.

      You mean take a chance like selling uncensored CD's?

      Yeah, that Wal-Mart, that's one stand up chain.

    8. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since you didn't post as an AC, you should expect a call from the M$FT legal department real soon.

    9. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah...the Corporate version (Open License) of Windows XP has no such activation procedure. These are the disks floating around, especially the "warez" ISO images you'll find on FTP. So really, you'll probably see just as many XP disks as you ever saw ME or any other Windows version....

    10. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not believe you.

      I have one. The CPU is equiv to a Celeron 400 Mhz, the drive is very slow.

      XP would be Really Slow on the box.

    11. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by mbrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who cares, who goes to Wal-Mart to buy CD's anyway.

    12. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Apathy+costs+bills · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't that what Microsoft was saying would happen if Windows wasn't required to be preloaded on every computer in America? Do you feel bad proving them right?

      --
      Kill Trolls Dead. Here's
    13. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Deer Hunter is a best selling game because people like hunting. People live in areas that are not on a coast, were you aware of that? These people enjoy Jeff Foxworthy. Windows is not cheap. Price is the most important thing. That's why people shop at walmart. People bought Windows because it came with thier Computer. Pretty simple

    14. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by zerblat · · Score: 0, Troll

      The same people who go to Wal-Mart to by a PC?

      --
      Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.
    15. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who buys CDs anywhere anymore what with Napster and all that...

    16. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by RatBastard · · Score: 5, Informative

      Walmart sells 25% of the computer/console games sold in the US. They WILL NOT carry a game with an M rating. Period. Game publishers are faced with three choices if they choose to make a game more racy than Metroiid Prime:
      1 - Make a WalMart version of the game.
      2 - Alter the game to get a T reating.
      3 - Tell Walmart to shove it.

      id software has already tiold Walmart to shove it. They know that people will buy their games no matter what.

      Most other game publishers are not in the financial position that id software is. They end up taking options 1 or 2. That XXX bike game removed all of the nudity in order to get a T rating and thus avoid the WalMart blacklist. 3DRealms sold a Walmart version of Duke Nukem 3D in order to avoid the WalMart blackout.

      While I believe that retailors have the right to not carry products they do not want, I also see that WalMart has enough market pull to affect the purchasing choices that even non-WalMart shoppers have.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    17. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still wouldn't give them the right to force Windows to be on each computer. By that logic, you should also be forced to bundle all the most popular and highly-pirated video games as well.

    18. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Raiford · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Right. Remember that folks that shop at Wal-Mart don't mind having an Emerson brand stereo system. Why should a computer system be any different. That was a real stroke of genius on their part !

      --
      "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
    19. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by frozenray · · Score: 1

      > So really, you'll probably see just as many XP disks as you ever saw ME or any other Windows version....

      Depends on the demographic you're looking at, IMO. High school and college students will probably find out how to get one of these "warezed" ISOs, but that isn't the case for much of the rest of the population. Granted, most of them get a shiny new XP Home edition with their "Dude, you're getting a Dell" boxen and think it came free with the system, but if one's not keen on playing games, there's no reason why many people couldn't be happy without Windows. I installed RH/Psyche on a PIII/350 the father of a friend got as a present a few weeks ago, and he seems to be happy with it so far. He does mainly web surfing and e-mail and I persuaded him to invest the money in a cable connection rather than into a new PC.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    20. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by ebbomega · · Score: 2
      --
      Karma: Non-Heinous
    21. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by JesseL · · Score: 2

      Wal-Mart certainly does sell un-weenied M-rated games. I got GTA3 there a couple months ago and is still definitley M (blood, hookers, swearing, etc.).

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    22. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by blochsound · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My aunt works at Wal-mart, and until I spoke with her I didn't realize how huge wal-mart is. If they get a product stocked at their stores that can literally make a company. Huge companies like Proctor and Gamble have to divert production when Wal-mart wants to run a special on their products. If Wal-mart is buying that can stop production for ANYTHING ELSE If we could only get these machines in the stores now.

      --
      ideas should be free
    23. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

      there's a naked bike game? I want one.

    24. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. They used Devil's Own off of Kazaa, just like everyone else.

    25. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
      That was _exactly_ my thought.

      I'd bet that the MAJORITY of people who bought these things are now running a pirate copy of Windows ME/XP.

    26. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wha? I bought GTA3 at Wal-mart. If that wasn't rated "M", it should have been. They may not carry a game with simlated (i.e. cartoon) nudity but that would be pretty darn silly considering some of the R rated movies they carry. Are they also going to refuse to carry that "extreme beach volleyball" game for the Xbox?

    27. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      walmart.com is more likely to sell M rated games than go ahead and put the game on the shelf....yes sometimes people under the recommended age get their hands on a CC but by selling products online they would be able to still carry the product without as much worry about kids shop lifting the game and some kids parents getting mad about it

    28. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by zapfie · · Score: 1

      The parent poster never claimed Windows was the cheapest OS. They claimed that Microsoft rose to get the marketshare they did because of the price of Windows versus the alternatives way back when.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    29. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by UU7 · · Score: 1

      yup exactly.
      If I could get my hands on one I wouldnt keep the OS.

    30. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by magicsquid · · Score: 2

      It's not true that Wal-Mart won't sell a game with a M rating. They just won't sell MOST games with M ratings. They sell the most popular ones that can bring them the most profits... just look at Grand Theft Auto III. They sell that, and last I checked, that was definitely M rated.

      --


      "Chances of RHIC-induced Armageddon are exceedingly rare, but... you never know." - MIT Physicist Bob Jaffe
    31. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Microlith · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not true.

      All of the Wal-Marts I've been to (and I live in Arkansas, world HQ of Wal-Mart) have and still do carry GTA3, Soldier of Fortune, Hitman 2, and a number of other decidedly violent games, complete with M ratings.

      Why this dissasociated policy exists, with the censored music and magazine covers, I don't know. But they do carry R rated movies and M rated games all the time.

    32. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by reflector · · Score: 2

      Do you feel bad proving them right?

      i'm not the poster, but if it were me, i would feel much worse about giving microsoft money than proving them right.

    33. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, from what I've heard, some people are actually using LindowsOS with those Microtel boxen. Some percentage are even signing up and paying $99 for a year of free updates to StarOffice and a few other commercial apps, and easy access to stuff like Gimp and Evolution that normally requires going through at least four menus/windows or one or two command lines with other Linux distros.

    34. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by jsse · · Score: 1

      as long as Windows cost essentially the same as Linux (the price of a blank CD-R)

      You are being sarcasm, but in fact it's possible. In mass production, the cost of producing a CD with software is much less than a blank CD-R. MS could really do that if they want to. However, that'd be contrary to their strategy "take the most out of each market". :)

    35. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "For the vast majority of people, price is way more important than quality. If it's cheap and reasonably useable, people will buy it in large numbers."

      Just to add to this idea: specs on a computer are very difficult to wrap your mind around. What is MHZ? What is GBs? What is Megabits? Etc. Lots of people out there just want a computer, and they don't understand why the numbers are important.

      To be honest, I think the PC market is suffering from too many choices. Right now, I have a budget for a laptop. But I'm totally stalled on buying one because there are too many trade-offs to make! I'm busy worrying about what it can't do instead of worrying about the important factor: what it can do.

      Apple had the right idea with the iMac: make the actual choices few in number. If you think about it, the only real choice to make was what color you wanted. (I'm oversimplifying a bit, but when you compare PC to Mac that really does seem to be the biggest issue.)

      I'm not surprised at all by Walmart's success with the product. It takes a while when you first start using a computer to realize what the upgrades actually buy you.

    36. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "The parent poster never claimed Windows was the cheapest OS. They claimed that Microsoft rose to get the marketshare they did because of the price of Windows versus the alternatives way back when."

      Good luck getting that idea across to everybody. Thanks to the media and general dislike of MS, everybody thinks that they got to the top by putting a gun to everybody's head and forcing them to reach for their wallet. There's little to no understanding that MS got to the top because MS was what the collective people wanted.

    37. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't realize how huge wal-mart is.

      Don't read Fortune? They are the largest company in the US.

    38. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Many, but not all of them.

      I see so many computers that only run one application. In a bar I saw a laptop running Winamp for the music - and nothing else. On my campus, there are lots of computers running only a browser - and nothing else. And lots of people only run a browser, wordprocessing and

      Can any of the Microsoft fanboys tell my why anybody should pay the 100$ extra for Windows in these cases?

    39. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by jcast · · Score: 1

      I don't think MS was ever what people wanted. It was closest to what they wanted.

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    40. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by fferreres · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At $200 you reach 80% of the population every two months or so. With $1000 you reach 10% every 6 months or so.

      I mean, no matter how good your product may be, if it's not fighting in the $200 and under price tag, most people will not be able to afford it. Even if 10000^10000 times faster, it's still innacesible.

      Of course, up until now these people could only get a used PC, or they had to make a mayor effort or do with less computers that they wanted or have a friend that custom built them one as cheap as possible.

      The $200 lines opens up a huge market. "Hey, I have $200, why not buy this new PC?".

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    41. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I don't think MS was ever what people wanted. It was closest to what they wanted."

      Closest doesn't automatically mean success. The Newton was the only kid on it's block, but it still didn't do so well.

    42. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats weird, cuz i bought my copy of GTA3 at walmart

      says m-rating right on the box

    43. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Apathy+costs+bills · · Score: 1

      That's a terrible position to be in, having to choose between your ethics and the law. The law says it's stealing, but your ethics say it's better than paying up.

      I don't know what I would do if I was stuck in that kind of paradox! My life is pretty simple by comparison.

      --
      Kill Trolls Dead. Here's
    44. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart is huge. No doubt of that.

      However, in spite of all the cheering and brouhaha going on here, people should acknowledge there is a distinct difference between Wal-Mart the stores that ordinary people walk into every day, and Walmart.com, the website, which is the only place people can get these Lindows computers....

      It's a little niche part of the WalMart empire. Let's not all 'Yay Linux!!y' about it.

    45. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right.

      Then this hypothetical person can stare at the box the computer is in wistfully for two months, until s/he can afford to buy a monitor for it with the additional money saved up.

      (note to anybody who hadn't noticed- the $199 computer has no monitor. Now, there are newbies who such a machine can still be sold to, but the $199 price isn't going to impress them when they discover they have to spend $100-200 more before they can even use the machine)

    46. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Many, many of the people who only use their PC to run one application run a specific application: the crap that comes on that AOL CDROM that came in the mail. No, really. I am not kidding. Lots of people almost exclusively live in that AOL shell.

      And, ummm, the CD doesn't come with a Linux version of the AOL program. Maybe they should try that, but they haven't so far.

    47. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Abreu · · Score: 2

      It is called BMX-XXX :

      http://www.bmxxxx.com/

      enjoy!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    48. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh funny, as I recall that BMX XXX content was changed for the PlayStation2 version ONLY and at SONY's request.

      Ahh well, not like we expect these /. posts to be based on fact... obtw, this missed point invalidates the rest of your post.

    49. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Control-Z · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Well no matter how rich Bill Gates is, MS is #72 on the Fortune 500 list and Wal-Mart is #1. Can't argue with results.

    50. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Are wal-marts in the states the same as they are here in Canada?

      Walmarts here are full of GTA3 : VC....

    51. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you have ANY idea how s-l-o-w XP/ME will be running on a low-end PC like that? Stop being a Microsoft shill!

    52. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by JesseL · · Score: 2

      That would make perfect sense if it wasn't for the fact that I bought GTA3 in the store.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    53. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by dalutong · · Score: 2

      No.. that's not even what is important. What is important is that now computers come, and are sold, with GNU/Linux preinstalled. That means the statistics of how many "linux installations" will come closer to reflecting the actual number.

      (i.e. before most people downloaded their distro of choice, now -- even if they just put on pirated windows or an old windows -- these are all checked as "linux installations.")

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    54. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 2


      Yeah, but on average, counting all the computers for which Windows is sold twice (once for retail the second for a company site license) or once too much (used with Linux), it's not a few geeks installing Windows on machines preinstalled with Linux that's gonna make a difference.

      Now, if Walmart start selling 10 or 100 times more Lindows PC's and everybody does that, I may change my mind, but a few thousand computers a month (if everybody did that) won't change much.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    55. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by egghat · · Score: 2

      Yeah.

      It' s extremly important to remember, that MS marketshare is as high as it is, since they never (technically) cared about privacy. (of course they claimed, that it costs them gazillions each year, but who cares). If I needed MS office to continue working on a spreadsheet at home, it was there essentially for free. Now things start to change and I see people considering OpenOffice, which have never considered it until MS introduced their activation stuff.

      I hope the same will start with their OS.

      Sometimes monopolies begin to tumble when they get too greedy.

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    56. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by jamesangel · · Score: 1

      Naomi Klein's No Logo is interesting on this topic, how huge chains like WalMart can effectively control markets due to their size.

    57. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that purpose I'd just buy an off-lease Dell from eBay... A PII/500+ goes for around $200.

    58. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by gryllotalpa · · Score: 1

      Meinen Freunden,

      Free is free, that is why you need not be burdened with copyrights.

      For developers, and users, freedom is important, that is why we need not be burdened by consumer products which can be dropped anytime.

      I'll always have free beer if I could.

      T'is freedom,
      Gryllotalpa

    59. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by blochsound · · Score: 1

      do you have a link to that arrticle?

      I would like to read it.

      thanks

      Chris Bloch

      --
      ideas should be free
    60. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Depends on the demographic you're looking at, IMO. High school and college students will probably find out how to get one of these "warezed" ISOs, but that isn't the case for much of the rest of the population.

      I think that the rest of the population is more likely to end up with the warez then you give them credit for. My father (clueless about all things computer related) went out and bought an eMachines computer, and the first thing he did was buy a CD-R drive, and copy one of his friend's warez CDs. The guy he borrowed the Warez CD from got his copy the same way.

      My mother figured out years ago that she could bring the DOS diskettes/Windows CD/Office CDs home from the office and install them at home when they upgraded at work instead of going to the store and buying the $99 upgrade. It's not a huge leap to go from there to realizing that you can save $50 if you buy the PC without windows, and then install the copy from the office when you get home.

      People are smarter than you give them credit for when it comes to getting something for free.

    61. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by frozenray · · Score: 1

      >People are smarter than you give them credit for when it comes to getting something for free.

      Agreed, but I try to argue like this:

      1. You can buy (actually, rent is the better word) the software. Good for your legal status, but very bad for you wallet: $199.- (or $ 99.-) for the operating system (XP Home), $ 479.- / $ 239.- for Office Standard, $ 180.- for three games, etc. This money would buy a cool TFT monitor, plus the setup is hard to secure and includes known spyware.

      2. You can copy commercial software illegally, which is basically free but takes time to find the warez, may compromise your security (trojans and viruses as a bonus add-on), they may prosecute you for doing it (I know the likelyhood of being caught is low, but nonetheless...), they may remotely disable the programs when you need them most, etc.

      3. I can install, say, RedHat 8 - either the free, _legal_ download, or the retail "Personal" version for $ 35.-. You can surf the net comfortably and securely with it, write e-mails and do not have to worry about mail viruses, burn CDs, do word processing, create spreadsheets, edit the images from your digicam, use IM, scan images, and play some pretty cool games. It's very stable given the right hardware, and everything's free. The catch: If you have trouble, it's support by me or by a few college geeks I know, but we're generally happy to help. Some hardware you have right now may not be supported, but this is mostly not a problem today. Commercial software, especially games, may not be available for it.

      Most of my aquaintances still use Windows and Office today, mainly because it came "free" with their computers and they know it from the office. I don't even try to convert the gamers and the people with small kids, their software requirements are not covered by Linux yet. But I have won half a dozen converts by now, and I hand out Knoppix CDs to everyone I know who could make use of them. My latest win is the 62-year old father of a friend who got an old PIII/350 as a present, but the harddisk was deleted by the company who gave it to him. He's happily using it to surf, mail and scan and has had no problems so far - and the installation took me less time than installing the equivalent Windows configuration.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    62. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by vanyel · · Score: 2
      Doesn't matter if the setup sux or not.

      I've only played with a Lindows box briefly, but I'm not sure why people are talking about how bad Lindows is. I run a small ISP and one of my users got one and wanted to know how to set it up to connect to me. I made a free house call as I'd not seen Lindows, and it was basically enter the login, password and phone number in one menu (which he'd actually already done) and he was online. I looked at the desktop briefly, and was surprised how much it looked like Windoze, but it was the easiest connection setup I've yet seen.

    63. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by hyperturbopete · · Score: 1

      Huge companies like Proctor and Gamble have to divert production when Wal-mart wants to run a special on their products.

      P&G makes lots of consumer products like cleaning products and diapers and stuff where it really doesnt matter which kind you buy, and you buy it all the time. So its easy to see 10s of millions of sales when something goes on sale and becomes the cheapest.

      I doubt it's as drastic with PC's. Then again, if you have budget PC's that can run AOL . . .

    64. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by frozenray · · Score: 1

      It's a book, not an online article. Recommended. Google also gives quite a number of hits on the topic.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    65. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by jamesangel · · Score: 1

      Its a book (was a very big seller last year) all about globalisation and its effects. See http://www.nologo.org/

    66. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by reflector · · Score: 2

      That's a terrible position to be in, having to choose between your ethics and the law.

      not at all. ethics wins every time, as far as im concerned.

      The law says it's stealing, but your ethics say it's better than paying up.

      no, not stealing. perhaps copyright infringement.

      I don't know what I would do if I was stuck in that kind of paradox! My life is pretty simple by comparison.

      that's really the best way to live. just avoid crooked people, corporations, and governments as much as possible.

    67. Re:I may seem like a troll for saying this by jcast · · Score: 1

      Well, obviously it has to seem useful (and at the price). It just doesn't have to seem ideal (which I think is what people want).

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
  8. There are great! by IrvineHosting · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just bought one of these for my dad. I installed redhat 8.0 and he loves it! He doesn't know the difference between it and windows. It is fun to watch is use mozilla for web browsing and mail. If microsoft disappeared off the planet I really think desktop computing would go on fine at this point.

    1. Re:There are great! by AndrewGoat · · Score: 0

      Not really. Linux doesnt have any good mud clients! SClient is the best one, and it crashes on me at random times.

    2. Re:There are great! by N3WBI3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tried that with mine but he needs AOL (boy does he need AOL, he insist that is the internet)

      --
    3. Re:There are great! by dbrutus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I sense an iMac/iBook in his future (runs AOL just fine).

    4. Re:There are great! by phavens · · Score: 0

      Well supposedly Lindows has been working on getting AoL to work on it... And currentlty comes preinstalled with Netscape and AIM so he could check his AoL email... Instant message his AoL friends and still have a decent system.
      Now add in the fact that instead of paying $149 (who pays $500) for Office you pay nothing and use OpenOffice. And you're set.

      --
      Patrick Havens (Mr. 573333 to you.) Graphic Artist / Coder / Father / Journeler
    5. Re:There are great! by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

      Not unless AOL get off their A$$ and realizes that I am not going to pay that much for a box my father will only use to browse the web and check email with. Heck I would rather put MS on the box for 400 than shell out for a mac.

      --
    6. Re:There are great! by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

      Yea I tried to install AOL on teh Lindows OS and it did not work, he needs aol for the dial up I cant convince him to go with another ISP for that. Thanks for the sugg though..

      --
    7. Re:There are great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is "that much"?

    8. Re:There are great! by Nameles · · Score: 2

      $22.95 for unlimited access, give or take a few bucks.

    9. Re:There are great! by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and I'm sure his dad spends a lot of time on MUDs.

    10. Re:There are great! by tshak · · Score: 2

      I proposed a solution for a call center to use all Linux based PC's (NetPC's or the like) because all the callcenter did was use email and the web (all of our customer management software is web based). Usability was not a concern since all we had to do is customize an interface that allowed them to go to Web and Email, and maybe even a simple word processer. The problem with Linux comes when a user needs to do more then that. Although Linux has come a long way, I'd much rather stick my parents on WinXP or OS X (I did the latter with my Dad) then any Linux distro.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    11. Re:There are great! by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      I tried to do that with my parents but they don't trust me because everytime I touch their computer, something usually goes wrong. That said, they are using Windows 98. :-)

    12. Re:There are great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't know anything about my dad, fscktard.

    13. Re:There are great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a sorry man who blames his tools.

    14. Re:There are great! by Idou · · Score: 1

      Me too. Similar experience, and I am getting my sister one this Christmas.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    15. Re:There are great! by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      It's a sorry man who blames his tools.

      I agree with you to a certain extent, but I'd be surprised if a Windows 98 box could manage the same uptime as my Debian GNU/Linux box. The "tools" one uses does have an effect.

      The strange thing is, I don't actually modify anything, since I'm only using it for checking my e-mail! Just because I curiously deleted some files on my dad's laptop when I was young, they no longer trust me! :-P

    16. Re:There are great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit Are you Jeff K?

    17. Re:There are great! by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      I could be completely off here, but doesn't Netscape 7 have all he needs to feel he has AOL?

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    18. Re:There are great! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

      http://www.irvinehosting.net/

      I looking for another web host, but your home page is the worst I've ever seen. If everyone saw it, Macromedia would go bankrupt. The technical details look good.

    19. Re:There are great! by commodoresloat · · Score: 2
      True, but I know about this poster's Dad based on what he posted - his Dad wants to use email and the web, and doesn't know the difference between windows and red hat. Do you think his Dad is going to switch back to Windows so he can spend time on MUDs?

      Besides, I don't agree that there are no mud clients for unix. Here are a few, and of course there's always emacs.

    20. Re:There are great! by jcast · · Score: 1

      Just curious---Why do your parents need more than ``Web and Email, and maybe even a simple word processer''?

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    21. Re:There are great! by EzekielLinux · · Score: 1

      Well if you were like me, alot of stuff you touch will break but thats part of the learning curve. Now I have learned what to do and what not to do, and now alot of my friends and parents consider me very good when it comes to computers. Just get a extra comp to screw around with and you'll do fine.

    22. Re:There are great! by tshak · · Score: 2

      Actually, most people do, but because they don't know what they _CAN_ do, than they are limited to what they thought the wanted to do (in some cases). My mother does silly greeting cards (God bless her!), games (games not available on Linux, but may be available on OS X), CD Audio (this has admittedly gotten a lot better of late with OSS), and other things that I personally don't even know about. My Dad, on the other hand, only uses his box for Word Processing and CD and DVD playing. Of course, in the future he may also want to manage his photos via a firewire camera. This is why I got him a G4 iMac. It works GREAT for him. A linux setup would not have worry-free DVD playing, and the photo management with firewire support is less likely to become available. Plus, OS X is just a heck of a lot easier to use then Gnome or KDE.

      Also, I don't have time to setup machines for my parents - I'm extremely busy, and what time I spend with them I want to be socializing, not messing with their boxes. My Mom bought her Dell and got it up and running w/o my help. I bought the Mac with my Dad, but he pretty much did everything on his own while I sat and watched. The only "tech support" calls I've gotten is from my Mom because she uses Outlook and had a virus or spyware or something. I then instructed her how to clean the virus, use adaware, and pointed her to Eudora if she chooses, or to just stick with web-based email clients. So, other than OE being a complete POS, everything's been great. Niether of them care about saving the ~$10 to $50 (Windows and OS X respectively, less ~$40 for a boxed Linux distro) OS cost because all it takes is a couple hours of wasted time trying to get a driver or piece of software to work, and it's just not worth it.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    23. Re:There are great! by carlmenezes · · Score: 2

      I agree. The main point here is that folks will start to realise that a computer can have something OTHER than windows on it and STILL browse the internet, send and receive email and print pictures.

      That should start a nice interesting little avalanche once word spreads about "that nice computer for less than 200 bucks that does everything I want it to".

      Hell...it just occured to me...it'll now be real easy for schools to buy these and set them up. Even wipe Lindows and put on Mandrake or RedHat - that'll make things even better. Also, since it's Linux there's no need to keep upgrading and adding hardware every year or so. Plus these are NEW computers! It would really make a difference to the kids...working on a new machine as opposed to working on some old donated one.

      Anyway, the point I'm making is...the majority of PC users have what I'd like to call basic computer literacy and for them, this is a GREAT deal.

      M$ needs to get ready...people aren't going to notice an expensive butterfly if a small BUT CHEAP moth does the job well enough.

      --
      Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    24. Re:There are great! by meffie · · Score: 1
      Yes they are.

      I bought one for my mother-in-law months ago. She uses it for email, web, and letters, all under Linux. She loves it.

      My brother-in-law showed her how to use abiword, without any prior Linux experience.

      When she asked if it was running windows, I said yes, it is X Windows.

    25. Re:There are great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then you must re-educate your father by introducing him to Slashdot. Here he'll learn how the only managable desktop for non-power users is Windows! XP! Double-Plus-Good!! PRO!! He can't possibly be really happy in KDE/Gnome, he just doesn't know any better. Teach him, for the children.

    26. Re:There are great! by shaitand · · Score: 2

      This makes a good point, from what I've seen linux is great for those with high computer literacy, without question. It's also good for those who have low to low mid computer literacy (as defined by those who have high computer literacy). But the true middle ground, where the user still doesn't know anything but thinks he does (and can convince the lower group of such because they know they don't know anything and don't know better) this is where linux fails. You can tweak everything but not if you don't know what your doing. This bombs most NT administrators who didn't really have to understand what was going on in the system. True for the most part there is nothing that requires you to change all those settings you don't understand (in fact most of them are probably just fine at default even if you do know what they are) but for the fledgling tweaker who was misguided into a windows only world they are under the impression they have to know what all those settings mean because MS only gives you access to a setting if they absolutely have to.

    27. Re:There are great! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      What features are you looking for?

      I went back to mud a few months ago a bit for old times sake. I went looking for a tty-mode mud client, and found mcl, which doesn't seem bad.

      Back when I mudded more seriously, all I used was a pretty normal telnet client (well, with a separate line-buffer text field...that's kind of a must-have).

    28. Re:There are great! by ces · · Score: 2

      Yea, don't your parent's realize that by letting you break their PC (and then hopefully fix it) you are well on the road to becoming a sysadmin.
      Of course that might be the problem, my mother still thinks I play the piano in a whorehouse, I haven't had the heart to tell her what I really do for a living.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    29. Re:There are great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you were wrong. It is called X, X11 or X Window System. Not X-Windows.

    30. Re:There are great! by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

      Sorry I ment Apple makes their hardware cheaper..

      --
    31. Re:There are great! by jcast · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clarifying that.

      Btw., I find cdparanoia | esdcat sufficient for CD audio, but obviously that's not user friendly :)

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
  9. Re:first post by Buck2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You're still a virgin, dude. Sorry.

    How's the weather up there, eh?

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  10. The Bottom Line by MBCook · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What matters in the bottom line. For most people, who just want to e-mail their friends and surf the web, the machines are more than powerful enough. And the fact that they cost so little goes a LONG way. Most people are willing to sacrifice some things for massive savings, and that's what we're seeing here, IMHO.

    But my other question is this: I wonder how many of the computers have copies of windows installed on them by the end user? Be it transfered (old PC doesn't work, so put Win95 on this new one) or coppied.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:The Bottom Line by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2

      ``For most people, who just want to e-mail their friends and surf the web, the machines are more than powerful enough.''
      That's right. Most people don't play the latest and greatest games that require last month's CPU and tomorrow's 3D card.
      END SARCASM

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:The Bottom Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, it's true. Most computer users aren't hardcore gamers.

  11. TigerDirect.com and Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tiger Direct has a Lindows PC as well with a faster processor and a bigger HD 1.3 Duron and 15GIG

    I thought people might like to know. I got me 2 of them. Of course I'll put Linux on it. :P

    1. Re:TigerDirect.com and Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah forgot to metion it's $30 more

    2. Re:TigerDirect.com and Lindows by BadlandZ · · Score: 2

      I can't find it... Someone mentioned they use to sell them but are sold out?

  12. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lindows PCs sell Wal-Mart

    1. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Slashdot posts on SLASHBOTS!

  13. Millions of programs no longer work by Subcarrier · · Score: 1

    "When you switch operating systems, millions of programs no longer work"

    Oh yeah? What a bummer! On the other hand...

    They also have relatively small hard disk drives of 10 gigabytes.

    So you could only install two of them anyway. What a lucky break.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  14. well, no windows when they are sold by cornjones · · Score: 2, Funny

    it seems customers don'd mind all that much if their computer does not run Windows

    well, they don't mind if it doesn't come with windows but i would guess that better than 9 out of 10 of them end up w/ windows on them. a few copies might even be legal (maybe)

    1. Re:well, no windows when they are sold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >[I] would guess that better than 9 out of 10 of
      >them end up w/ windows on them.

      Okay, so let's say this becomes popular, and many more retailers start selling PC's with OS's other than Windows, or even with no OS at all. Let's go as far as to say, that some of these "alternatives" will actually start to be widespread enough to make a difference. (No, the 10 million Linux users have NOT really made a difference yet. I've been waiting for the revolution since 1992, but I've just about lost hope.)

      So Microsoft has a couple of choices for their next OS release:

      1. Hard Core Customer Authentication.

      Whatever it takes, make damned sure the customer's installation is compliant with the license. This might mean something like a Dongle (which is obviously breakable), or a solid call-home-routinely-and-identify-yourself-to-our-s atisfaction system.

      Actually, it might even be possible for them to get enough ahead of the copy-protection arms race, if they really are clever (innovative?) about it. A bit of hard crypto, combined with a (expensive for all parties) strong two-way communication and identification requirement, just might do it. If there were real risks involved in using a pirated copy of windows on the net, it might actually lead to less installs of pirated copies of windows.

      2. Go ahead and let them copy it.

      They could go as far as to put the personal version of XP up for download. Maybe send out $10.00 CD's of XP. Hell, send them to every man woman and child in the US like AOL does. Gets them even more mindshare, and that many more machines where apps for their platform will be installed. And, yes, they still have their $175 version, their $899 version, their $10,000 version, and MSDN.

  15. Apparently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the editors don'd mind if things are spell-checked before they get posted.

    1. Re:Apparently... by nmg · · Score: 1

      You're right, they don'd.

    2. Re:Apparently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. PC's by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

    Sounds great! I am considering buying one myself for Christmas this year, putting a better distro on it, setting up a router on my DSL connection and running an Apache web server.

    Finally, Walmart does something smart in their electronics department!

    Well, this was gonna be first post, but by the time I typed it there were at least 15 posts =\ too many damn slashdotters ;) j/k slashdot ROCKS!

    --

    Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

  17. Who is buying these? by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    Are geeks buying these low-end computers, or average people who want different, or Wal-mart customers who don't read the fine print and think they are buying something else?

    Maybe they would make a good PVR...

    1. Re:Who is buying these? by RatBastard · · Score: 2

      They would make terrible PVRs. The processor is just too weak to handle the load. Even with a hardware MPeG solution. An 800Mhz C3 is on par with a 400Mhz Celeron. My P3/550 is about as weak as I would even consider for the job and that's with the hardware encoder that's in it.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:Who is buying these? by whidbey · · Score: 3, Informative

      I bought one. I'm a programmer, with most of my work on UNIX. I, however, have to get to the UNIX box through a MicroSh*t Windows box, and have to also use Word and Excel. To be honest, I'm sick of it....

      In all honesty, I'm not so thrilled with Lindows. There was no documentation, they did away with man (although most everthing is there in their "documents" tool), and promised software didn't seem to be installed. No biggie, I went and got it for free from the 'net.

      I will probably end up putting Mandrake or Red Hat on it when I've got more time...

      The big thing was I needed to set up a home network with printer sharing and it would have been more of a hassle to try to upgrade my Pentium 150 so that I could load a Linux Distro and all the hassles of dealing with old, proprietary Packard Bell components.

      This thing got me up and running fast and cheap. I'll by the speed demon PC later....

      BTW, there's no way in Hell I'd put a pirated copy of XP (or Me, 9x, NT) on this computer. It is blissfully MS free!

      ~whidbey

    3. Re:Who is buying these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandrake 9 isn't a good choice, it has some problems dealing with the cpu. Their faq tells you to remove an i686 directory when you hit the point where it wants you to set the password. That fix kind of works but the system was still quirky for me after that. Can't tell you about Redhat on there, but slackware 8.1 installs and runs great on it.

    4. Re:Who is buying these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really should try debian. It's the right thing.

  18. Intel that big a selling point? by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it seems customers don'd mind all that much if their computer does not run Windows and doesn't carry an Intel processor

    Is having an Intel CPU still that big a deal to the average consumer? I know they still blow a ton of cash on advertising how a P4 will "make the internet faster" and the like, but does your average consumer care? They obviously care about Windows, not because it's Windows but because Deer Hunter 8 or 3D Home Recipe Book VI won't run on anything else. But the CPU?

    --
    "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    1. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2

      Wait - you mean having an Intel processor will make my 56K modem surf the Internet at lightning speeds?

      Damn - good bye, PowerMac!

      (For the humor impaired: This is a joke. I have DSL. Thank you for playing.)

    2. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear John Hummel (alias Dark Paladin),

      Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to "play." You have no idea how exciting it was for you to allow me to "play."

      If you'd ever like to "play" again, let me know.

      Thank you dearly!
      Anonymous Pony

    3. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by EvilAlien · · Score: 2
      The whole idea of saving money by getting a non-Intel chip is what let Cyrix exist for so long and let AMD move past the cheap alternative to serious competitor.

      The sub-average user sees the dollar savings as a real benefit without even understanding the performance implications. Look at the Celeron and Duron... sure, some enthuiasts grabbed onto the bargain cachetarded chips to save money and overclock the hell out of them, but lots of people bought them because a chip is a chip, and cost savings is a quantifiable win.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    4. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh, you nerds and your misplaced sarcasm.

      A faster processor (and/or hard drive, more memory) will make your Internet experience faster. End of story.

      What turnip truck did you just fall off of that you think the only component of web surfing is your link speed?

    5. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not on a 56K modem. Nothing(NOTHING) will make that any quicker. Also a faster processer doesn't really do much

    6. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What turnip truck did you just fall off of that you think the dominant factor in the "world wide wait" is link speed, not CPU speed.

      ~~~

    7. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the "Mozilla" turnip truck.

    8. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you. all those apps are a big flaming turd on the hard drive platters of america, you terrorist goat fucker.

    9. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it's a WinModem that uses the CPU instead of a DSP.

    10. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by Shuh · · Score: 1
      Did you ever stop and wonder why apps like Discreet's 3D Studio MAX R5 or Avid|DS and Symphony only work on Windows NT/2000 systems? Perhaps they know something you don't. In fact, I'd stake my entire life savings on that fact.
      More likely they are being paid something you don't know about.
    11. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by enjo13 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes.. The Intel logo does make a pretty big difference. Intel really does enjoy tremendous brand recognition and people tend to associate Intel with top of the line computer power.

      However, while Intel is a big brand, Walmart is many orders of magnitude bigger. People are willing to overlook the lack of recognizable and trusted brand on the box because they have such high brand loyalty to Walmart.

      Walmart has that effect. If anyone can inspire change in the industry.. its a retailer like Walmart. They have legions of loyal customers who trust them to stock merchandise that they can rely on... That's why I like this so much. Its only going to be much later that all of a sudden people realize that hundred of thousands (if not millions) of people are running these Linux PC's.. and THAT will be the day that people will finally realize that there is a world outside of Microsoft. THAT will be the day that Microsoft will begin to lose its desktop monopoly.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    12. Re:Intel that big a selling point? by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      "Is having an Intel CPU still that big a deal to the average consumer?"

      I have a friend whose father (68 years old I think) honestly believes that swapping his AMD machine for an Intel will stop the pop-up ad problem.

      He believes this, and refuses to hear anything to the contrary.

      Since I'm not being paid to convince him of the facts, (and I doubt you could pay me enough to try!), I'm pretty sure he'll get a new computer, it'll be an intel box, and, since it'll be a brand new XP installation, it probably will work better. It might even be configured with a pop-up ad blocker, who knows?

      To him, it will appear that Intel is right...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  19. Linux?! Y-E-S! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What matters in the bottom line. For most people, who just want to e-mail their friends and surf the web, the machines are more than powerful enough. And the fact that they cost so little goes a LONG way. Most people are willing to sacrifice some things for massive savings, and that's what we're seeing here, IMHO.
    But my other question is this: I wonder how many of the computers have copies of windows installed on them by the end user? Be it transfered (old PC doesn't work, so put Win95 on this new one) or coppied.

  20. Who cares there is Pricewatch. by eonblueye · · Score: 1

    With Pricewatch you can build a really upscale PC for about 350.00 dollars (plus/minus). The PC Walmart offers is pretty low-end shit technology
    to do anything with.

    --
    +++ David Watts 5495 0.0 0.5 1888 884
    1. Re:Who cares there is Pricewatch. by Salubri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One small point...

      That will work for people who know computers well enough to build them, but the average person doesn't really know too much on how to make one.

      Everyone knows the old addage you get what you pay for. When I worked selling computers though, there were two types of customers. There was the type that wanted the best hardware they could get, price be damned, and there was the type that just wanted to type stuff up and surf the net, and those people really only wanted to spend what they had to.

      By offering customers a(cheap) linux solution which allows them to type up papers and surf the internet, you are answering the computer needs of a signifigant marketshare. By putting Linux in thier hands, you're enabling them to see that there's more to the world than bargain basement e-machines running the latest M$ operating system, and for around 33% - 50% of the cost of one of those e-machines.

      --
      ----- I want my LART.
    2. Re:Who cares there is Pricewatch. by dbrutus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Congratulations, you are not in the target demographic for this machine which is non-computer savvy tightwads who want basic computer functionality.

    3. Re:Who cares there is Pricewatch. by eonblueye · · Score: 1

      The reason I said what I did, is most of you people are talking about installing Mandrake or Slackware, blah blah . If you're able to install a distribution of Linux (effectively) then you damn straight should be able to put together a computer (Then come with well documented instructions!!)?
      It just seems you "consumers" (rather then savvy geeks) need brand recognition to get by with your life.

      --
      +++ David Watts 5495 0.0 0.5 1888 884
    4. Re:Who cares there is Pricewatch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that you are getting your components from legal sources, rather than from the back of a truck in some dark alley, you can't "build a really upscale PC for about 350.00 dollars".

    5. Re:Who cares there is Pricewatch. by Salubri · · Score: 1
      "If you're able to install a distribution of Linux (effectively) then you damn straight should be able to put together a computer (Then come with well documented instructions!!)?"

      Well, yes. Pretty much everyone I know who can install linux and actually get something that works when they're done can build their own PCs. There is a big difference between the computer's marketed use is and what the /. crowd could/would do with it.
      "It just seems you "consumers" (rather then savvy geeks) need brand recognition to get by with your life."

      I build my computers, my guitars, and many other things around my apartment. I've never really needed any sort of brand name on my products, just a good cost/performance ratio. So, outside of trying to trigger a flame war, I don't know why you would throw in that comment.

      --
      ----- I want my LART.
    6. Re:Who cares there is Pricewatch. by Znork · · Score: 2

      I already have an upscale PC. My old utility servers, however, are starting to fail with frightening regularity. I need utility servers that can work as NFS servers, DNS server, external web server, print/backup server, etc. I dont want to pay 350 dollars for power I dont need. If I can use a $199 machine for the same job, I will get the $199 machine. In fact, if I can get 4 of them for $800, even better. That's less than I paid for my upscale machine for my infrastructure needs.

      There's a place for $350 machines. There's a place for $1500 machines too. But there's definitely a place for $199 machines, and there's starting to be quite a large number of things you can do with those machines.

  21. All snide comments aside... by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... how can this be anything but good for Linux?

    Consider - the biggest excuse that people have used about Linux has been "nobody uses it, so nobody writes software for it."

    Well, people are using it, now. This is the opportunity for Linux to show that it is, indeed, useful for everyday users... or not.

    Face it - this is going to be Linux's baptism by fire. Let's try hoping that it survives, instead of making half-witticisms about Wal-Mart shoppers.

    --
    Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
    1. Re:All snide comments aside... by caluml · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is the opportunity for Linux to show that it is, indeed, useful for everyday users... or not. Face it - this is going to be Linux's baptism by fire.

      And that's what scares me. People are going to judge Linux by Lindows. I've never used it. I hope it's good and polished. But I'd feel rather more happy with the fate of Linux resting on say, RedHat.

      How long has Lindows been around for again?...

    2. Re:All snide comments aside... by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Lindows is more newbie friendly than Redhat since it doesn't support servers the same way and it doesn't support power user features. The real problem with Lindows isn't user friendly but rather that it comes stripped and uses a modem connection to download most apps.

    3. Re:All snide comments aside... by jsse · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter. They will find out there are better distro out there and they'd choose wisely on their needs, and they'll soon find that they can keep using the software they are using on Lindows.

      Distro doesn't matter, as long as it's Linux. I just quote Alan Cox.

    4. Re:All snide comments aside... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2

      ``this is going to be Linux's baptism by fire''
      Yup. And it's going to give people Yet Another wRong Perspective (YARP) on Linux. Come on, how representative is a Linux distro that runs in single-user mode (or as root, which is it?), runs MS Windows programs, and comes with a paid subscription programme, of the whole lot of GNU/Linux distros out there?

      Still, kudos to Walmart, Lindows, and all others involved for showing the World an alternative to buying expensive hardware to be able to run expensive and oppressive software.

      ---
      A PC without MS Windows is like a race car without a home entertainment system.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    5. Re:All snide comments aside... by mickeywawa · · Score: 1

      What's really scary is if these things takes off, Walmart could start advancing into the retail software market. Think about it - buy up some noname Linux officeware products. Put on a Walmart brand and a big gold "Works with Walmart PCs!" sticker. Price at, for example, $25 a copy and put it on the shelf, just for kicks, right next MS' $500 hunks of crap. Now which system is Joe User going to buy? Somehow I doubt Walmart will shelve free software for these machines. Curse their black hearts.

    6. Re:All snide comments aside... by MsGeek · · Score: 2

      They also sell the $199 PCs with Lycoris Linux pre-installed. That is a legit Linux that has user accounts and free upgrades. Unfortunately unless you do a lot of tweaking Mandrake no workie on a CIII-equipped PC.Maybe they'll have the CIII prob sorted in 9.1.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    7. Re:All snide comments aside... by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      Funny, I would be more worried if they would use GNOME/RedHat than using anything KDE-based, be it SuSE, Mandrake, Lindows or whatever.

    8. Re:All snide comments aside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... how can this be anything but good for Linux?

      Easy - the people buying $199 computers probably aren't very technical and won't be able to figure out why they can't run any off the shelf software or play any games. This could create bad publicity/headaches/returns for WalMart.

      On the other hand, most of them are probably just going to wipe the hard drives and install a copy of Windows 2000 or XP that they "borrowed" from a friend anyway.

    9. Re:All snide comments aside... by jcast · · Score: 1

      Somebody please explain to me the difference between Walmart and M$ sitting astride the retail software market. I'm not getting it.

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
  22. How long does linux stay on the machine? by Horizon_99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be very interested to see how long Linux stays on those machines before some friend/neighbour/relative drops by and fdisks the system to install XP of which they just happen to have a copy?

    1. Re:How long does linux stay on the machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah and you can forget that those people are the "computer literate" I'm sure they have some connection to Microsoft's anti-linux plan.

    2. Re:How long does linux stay on the machine? by mojo17 · · Score: 1

      If more and more people start doing this, Microsoft will probably sue Wal*Mart for encouraging Windows piracy!!

    3. Re:How long does linux stay on the machine? by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      No worries, MS' OS registration/activation schemes will cure that. Remember, these machines are for non-computer savvy tightwads.

    4. Re:How long does linux stay on the machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it the reason why MS has introuduced product
      avtivation?

  23. Attracting novices? Really? by dagg · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ... attracting novices looking for a way onto the Internet as well as high-end users wanting a second box.

    These things don't come with monitors, modems, etc. I'd be really surprised if novices are buying these things. I guess they might be if they are getting the "extra-price-items"... like a monitor.

    These seem like geek toys. Or maybe as a CPU upgrade for those with old PC's.

    --
    What your sex would be at Walmart
    --
    Sex - Find It
    1. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 1
      I was under the impression that it was broadband ready, meaning it had a NIC.

      They support high-speed Internet (though the service itself is not included)


      At least, that's how I read that statement.
    2. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Walmart would be your sex.

    3. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      K. NIC, Modem, NIC, Modem, NIC, Modem... They both have blinking lights, great, they must be the same. I'll just plug my phone line into this here port. And hey the internet doesn't work anymore.... You are a dolt. The parent post said nothing about NIC's, it said they don't come with a Modem. Learn to read.

    4. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 1

      I believe you missed my point. I assumed he cared about the modem for the purpose of connecting to the Internet. After all, most of the postings thus far have focused on what people will do with these (write email, browse the web, do some text editing). Having a NIC is a way to connect to the Internet via a High Speed connection, without having to purchase anything additional. The need for a monitor is still valid, but this machine is Internet ready according to the article, with no need to purchase a NIC.

    5. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by davmoo · · Score: 2

      They have a nic, so they are broadband ready.

      But you really expect someone who is so tight they are buying a $199 PC to be willing to shell out $40+ a month for broadband access? Keep in mind all the previous /. stories about how Joe Average PC User is not willing to pay that much for net access.

      On the other hand, do you expect a total novice who is only interested in surfing the net who bought this cheap bargain basement PC to purchase and install his own modem? And know enough to get a Linux-supported modem at that?

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    6. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by momobaxter · · Score: 1

      My dad is computer illterate and he pays $40 a month for internet access. Road Runner was installed for free and he doesn't have to worry about dropping $15 into a second phone line and another $15-$20 for an ISP.

      The question is: how many of these users are going to use the internet enough to afford a second phone line...and if they do have one, RR or some other cable inet service isn't going to cost them much more.

      --
      "Full sources for linux currently runs to about 200kB compressed" --Linus Torvalds 31-Jan-1992
    7. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      Before they started shipping, Lindows made sure that there was a NIC and either a supported Linmodem or a hardware modem in all the Microtel machines, and I think similar measures are taken for the other OEMs. LindowsOS is touted as "the broadband OS," so there are NICs in even the bottom of the line machines.

    8. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      there are NICs in even the bottom of the line machines.

      There had better be, considering that I can buy a NIC for $4. Funny thing is, I've had much better experiences with the cheap $4 NICs than I have with the "good" brands. Hell, most of the $20-30 NICs are exactly the same as the $4 ones anyway: an RTL8139 reference board. Only difference is the box, and maybe a sticker on the board. Don't even get me started on the $80 I wasted on a 3com NIC a few years ago. Never again! Oh well, at least I was able to trade it for some laptop parts...

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    9. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a good point. Wal-mart doesn't sell computer monitors, so the only people that really buy their computers from them are geeks looking to do network installs of Linux (or some other headless-administrable OS). Novices go to Dell.com like everyone else.

    10. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Apparently that's the case. WalMart is happy enough with their sales volume on these machines that it actually made the news. Heck, for all we know Linuxers are buying these things to act as X Terminals.

      The fact of the matter is that people tend to try and pay as little for what they get as possible. Wal-Mart has literally made a business out of selling inexpensive goods that are just barely "good enough." What this means is that you can completely forget about the margins on PC hardware ever going up. Once Wal-Mart gets into the game margins go from thin to non-existant and stay there.

    11. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... And why would you buy an X terminal with no monitor and a 10 gig hard drive?

    12. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Many people who have monitors from old computers.
      2. No need to network install; it has CD ROM drives.

      I think it's very likely that many geeks buy this for friends and families. that's what I'd do.

    13. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by Puggs · · Score: 1

      I dont know about the Walmart PC's, but the Lindows PC from evesham in the UK come with a modem, still no monitor though

      not that that matters to me though - if i were to get one (theyre £250 over here though) the pci slot would be getting a tv out graphic card to make a nice cheap box for my divx collection ;)

    14. Re:Attracting novices? Really? by pizpot · · Score: 1

      by the way, dsl and cable are $25/month canadian here in winnipeg, which is $17 US.

  24. Review of LindowsOS 3.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the latest and very juicy review of LindowsOS 3.0.

  25. Reality check... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Take a reality pill. How many of the people buying Lindows PCs are actually leaving Linux in place? And how many are taking their bootleg copy of Windows 2k (or whatever) and installing that?

    1. Re:Reality check... by Khalid · · Score: 2

      Even if this was true, which I fact I doubt, then MS would have to prove it ! how could they ? by sending a cop to every buyer's house ?

      Maybe some geeks could install what they want on it, including Windows XP, but how could joe six pack install Windows XP for example with it's activation process ?

    2. Re:Reality check... by UberLord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, but the point is that a Linux based PC was sold. It's another number on the userbase. The userbase size is very important to companies thinking about writing a Linux app or game - are there enough people to buy it and turn a profit?

      Hopefully, this will make game companies sit up and take note - more Linux users = more quality games and apps.

    3. Re:Reality check... by GlassHeart · · Score: 2
      Ah, but the point is that a Linux based PC was sold. It's another number on the userbase. The userbase size is very important to companies thinking about writing a Linux app or game - are there enough people to buy it and turn a profit?

      It's another false statistic in the user base. A person who buys a "Linux PC" but runs Windows on it isn't going to buy Linux games or apps, so the potential profit can never be realized from them.

      Even those who do continue to use Linux belong to a category unlikely to spend a lot on games. After all, they bought a cheap PC.

    4. Re:Reality check... by primus_sucks · · Score: 1

      I think the only real reason someone would do this would be to play games on it. IMO, Linux is just as good or better for everything else. But why not just keep Linux and buy a GameCube for $150 that will probably have better gaming performance anyway? Small price to pay to stay legal and not have to run a crappy insecure OS.

    5. Re:Reality check... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How clever to be the first to make the same point already expressed in a couple dozen posts before yours. And +5 AC at that. Isn't self-mod wonderful?

    6. Re:Reality check... by shaitand · · Score: 2

      True but it's a counterbalance, for instance I use linux exclusively at home. I use it extensively at work (the work aspect is becoming more extensive as linux proves itself to my employer where I suggest he try it). In neither place are the statics factored in by those gaming companies. In addition I've also setup a number of systems with linux for home users. We now sell linux personal systems as well as buisness systems. Again pretty much none of these systems get factored into the linux userbase in commercial eyes. There is no way they could. Linux is free, we don't have to buy a box set for each of these systems, if we did, that would cut back the cost savings of implementing a linux solution and for now, it would be harder to push.

      The customers we save money with these solutions however, can then turn the savings over and use it to buy games. They now have another $100 to $200 in their pockets they would have spent on the machine and can now spend on games.

    7. Re:Reality check... by RocketRay · · Score: 1
      How many of the people buying Lindows PCs are actually leaving Linux in place? And how many are taking their bootleg copy of Windows 2k (or whatever) and installing that?

      I'll bet, not many. Installing an operating system isn't easy for a novice, whether it be Windows or Linux. In my recent experience, in fact, I've found Linux to be much easier to install than Windows. I tried '95, '98SE, ME, and finally W2K installed right. (Windoze is just there for games, folks) The others would mess up during reboots or not even get past the initial disk check.

      So I really doubt Joe Sixpack is gonna have the necessary expertise to get a pirate copy of Windows to install on his $199 Walmart box.

  26. Re:In Soviet Russia..... by dirkdidit · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia, over using a joke warrants death.

  27. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

    They have built an empire selling sweat shop wares at prices that no one else can compete with. This has sounded the death knell for the mom and pop operations of the world.

    Am I supposed to be unhappy at paying lower prices from an efficient company? Am I supposed to be angry because Wal-Mart doesn't charge me more?

    Do you get angry when Apple is "forced" to lower prices because of the prices of commodity PC hardware?

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  28. Re:In Soviet Russia..... by rice_web · · Score: 1

    Also in Soviet Russia, oh heck, I've got no joke.

    --
    The Political Programmer
  29. $200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by joestar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Would be great... Because leaving Lindows to Linux newcomers is really the worst thing that can happen to them! 1) proprietary stuff everywhere 2) using the system as root = welcome to viruses in the future and so on.

    Users need a real and *easy to use* Linux system! A pre-installed Mandrake Linux (8.2 or 9.0) is in my opinion the best system they can be offered. It's real Free Software, it's secure, it's fast, it's reliable, and there are many many software available for it.

    Lindows' success is the result of it's CEO's address large book really a bad for Linux because it's just an attempt to provide a *very badly designed* system that looks as closely as possible to Windows.

    This isn't the future of masses computing in any way in my opinion.

    1. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1, Redundant
      It's real Free Software, it's secure, it's fast, it's reliable, and there are many many software available for it.
      And unless you know exactly what you're doing (which new users don't), you're stuck staring at a monitor refreshing at 60 Hz - welcome to headache heaven!

      Sure, I can just blah blah blah - no I can't! I'm not a power user, and I'm not going to modify my X config file! Give me a fucking graphical tool for it! Windows can do it - so why can't I do it in X?
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by chuck · · Score: 1
      Lindows' success is the result of it's CEO's address large book really a bad for Linux [....]
      Umm... what?
    3. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Uhh_Duh · · Score: 3, Informative


      When I bought mine, I had my choice between Mandrake and Lindows. I chose Lindows so I could see what it was like. It's umm.. yucky.

      But then I'm not a fan of Linux for the desktop in general. The GUI's are too inconsistent between apps for my taste.

      --
      -- People who hate Windows use Linux. People who love UNIX use BSD.
    4. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by joestar · · Score: 2

      You really should try Mandrake Linux! MandrakeSoft has worked on ergonomy in Linux for four years and you don't have any file to edit manually in Mandrake! Everything is graphical... installing a new software, installing a new device... everything is automatic, smooth, graphical.

      And the ergonomy in Mandrake goes far further: for instance it's the only Linux distribution that lets you use your Floppy, CD-ROM, Zip... like under Windows. All others still need mount/umount commands (typed or with the mouse), and many some cases, it's very bad and not ergonomic (lost on data for floppy, CD-ROM locked...).

      OK Red Hat 8.0 looks a bit better than Mandrake 9.0 but I know them, next time we'll get ergonomy + excellent look&feel :-)

    5. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lindows' success is the result of it's CEO's address large book really a bad for Linux because...

      What the fuck does this mean ???

      Jesus Fucking Christ, I can't believe it. It's really that horrible. It's really that abysmal. It's difficult to believe anything other than the fact that you, sir, recently underwent frontal lobotomy surgery.

      There is no other explanation.

    6. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by bkhl · · Score: 1

      And unless you know exactly what you're doing (which new users don't), you're stuck staring at a monitor refreshing at 60 Hz - welcome to headache heaven!

      This wouldn't be much of a problem if the system comes preinstalled.

    7. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by hussain · · Score: 1

      He must work for microsoft.

    8. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      "it's [Lindows] just an attempt to provide a *very badly designed* system that looks as closely as possible to Windows."

      Yeah, but so is Windows, a very badly designed system that looks *exactly* like Windows.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    9. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by dbarclay10 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Lindows' success is the result of it's CEO's address large book really a bad for Linux because it's just an attempt to provide a *very badly designed* system that looks as closely as possible to Windows.

      Just to be sure that people don't think the above post is a troll, I'd like to say that this is my observation as well. Having talked to Michael (Lindows' CEO), I know that the only thing he brings to the Linux desktop is a large rolodex, and a used-car-salesman attitude.

      I also spoke to Cliff Beshers, their technical lead, and I was even less impressed. At least Michael knows what he brings to the party - we may not thing it's the right thing, but at least it's honest about it - but Cliff shouldn't have the word "technical" in his title anywhere.

      --

      Barclay family motto:
      Aut agere aut mori.
      (Either action or death.)
    10. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you try

      xf86cfg - Graphical configuration tool for XFree86 4.0

    11. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Badge+17 · · Score: 1

      The people who buy these PCs probably do not know the difference between Mandrake and Lindows. They will let the default settings ride (unless they're fantasy fans, or something)

      In order to promote "good" OSS like Mandrake, it has to be the default...

      Speaking as a fairly advanced end-user who just switched to Linux, this is where I think the "choices" part of open-source breaks down... giving the user too many initial choices creates an impression of chaos - it should just boot up into Mandrake Linux with KDE (or GNOME) without asking...

    12. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      And unless you know exactly what you're doing (which new users don't), you're stuck staring at a monitor refreshing at 60 Hz - welcome to headache heaven!

      And this is different from Windows how?

      It's not like MS makes the refresh settings easy to find, and I've yet to see a Windows install that didn't default to 60Hz.

      Give me a fucking graphical tool for it! Windows can do it - so why can't I do it in X?

      SuSE has had a graphical tool for a couple of years now. Mandrake has one too, I'm told. I bet Red Hat has one as well. Perhaps you should try a modern distro some time?

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    13. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent post is the funniest thing I have read all week.

    14. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Give me a fucking graphical tool for it! Windows can do it - so why can't I do it in X?

      SuSE included a "fucking graphical tool" for ages and most other distros also do for quite some time.

      But that doesn't matter to you of course because you don't need to know that to troll around.

    15. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by dsfox · · Score: 2

      What proprietary stuff are you talking about? Do you KNOW what you're talking about?

    16. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by absurdhero · · Score: 1

      I think he/she does. Lindows is filled with proprietary software and a proprietary packaging system. One of their proprietary pieces of software is their windows compatibility layer (modified BSD wine) and windows utilities.

    17. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      Well, of course I don't need to know that to troll around. But then again, I've never tried SuSE, as I haven't been able to figure out, where to download an ISO from them, and I don't feel like spending money on something, that I don't know for sure, that I'll keep around.

      But - let's see - what have I tried:

      RedHat 8.0 - spent 5 days trying that one, couldn't find any way to change the refresh rate; sure, I could change the resolution, and if I chose 1024x768x24 I would get 85 Hz, which my monitor can do easily - any other resolution - *bam*, back to 60 Hz.

      Mandrake 9.0 (RC3 I think) - spent around 5 hours on that one, as I get major headaches, when I'm stuck staring at something doing 60 Hz, and all resolutions were stuck at that refresh rate. Maybe I just have a crappy monitor, but why should I need to whip out a calculator, a manual and search Google for hours on end just to figure out something as simple as that? Haven't gotten around to trying the final edition, that I have lying around here somewhere.

      Lycoris - build 46 I think - not quite sure here ... I actually think it managed to give me an 75 Hz refresh rate at 1280x1024; of course, I'd prefer 1280x960, as that is a 4x3 resolution and not a 5x4 resolution like 1280x1024 but that's another discussion altogether.

      So, sure - I'm a troll. But - you're pointing to another distro than I was. You're refering to SuSE, I was refering to Mandrake (8.2 and 9.0 RC3).

      Oh - and if it's such a good tool, why doesn't other distros use it?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    18. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2
      And this is different from Windows how?
      Not very. But you can call your friend/whoever and ask them, and you still don't need to muck around as root fiddling around with obscure config files. Sure - config files gives you some VERY powerfull options etc., but if your a good developer and programmer, it wouldn't be too hard to expose quite a lot of the functions in an easy to use front end. No - VI does not count as an easy to use front end, anymore than Janet Reno counts as easy on the eyes when she's in a two piece bathing suit.

      Perhaps you should try a modern distro some time?
      I've never tried SuSE, as I haven't been able to figure out, where to download an ISO from them.

      But - let's see - what have I tried:

      RedHat 8.0 - spent 5 days trying that one, couldn't find any way to change the refresh rate; sure, I could change the resolution, and if I chose 1024x768x24 I would get 85 Hz, which my monitor can do easily - any other resolution - *bam*, back to 60 Hz. I seem to remember, that Null was better? A while since I used it, but I liked Null better than 8.0 for some reason ...

      Mandrake 9.0 (RC3 I think) - spent around 5 hours on that one, as I get major headaches, when I'm stuck staring at something doing 60 Hz, and all resolutions were stuck at that refresh rate. Maybe I just have a crappy monitor, but why should I need to whip out a calculator, a manual and search Google for hours on end just to figure out something as simple as that? Haven't gotten around to trying the final edition, that I have lying around here somewhere.

      Lycoris - build 46 I think - not quite sure here ... I actually think it managed to give me an 75 Hz refresh rate at 1280x1024; of course, I'd prefer 1280x960, as that is a 4x3 resolution and not a 5x4 resolution like 1280x1024 but that's another discussion altogether.

      You're refering to uSE, I was refering to Mandrake (8.2 and 9.0 RC3, although that didn't come over quite well).

      Oh - and if it's such a good tool, why doesn't other distros use it?
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    19. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2
      This wouldn't be much of a problem if the system comes preinstalled.
      On a system that doesn't include a monitor and will be hooked up to anything from a 13" mono-green monitor to the latest state of the art flat screen, I think it might pose a problem. Okay, so the flat screen is a bit much and will be okay to look at @60Hz, but I think you get my point :-)
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    20. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2
      You really should try Mandrake Linux!
      I have tried Mandrake; both 8.2 and 9.0 RC3(I think it's RC3). It's nice and it default to 60Hz and it's a pain to figure out how to change it. I seem to remember, that 8.2 enabled me to change the refresh rate, as I used it for quite a while, and I get major head aches when staring at a 60Hz refresh for more than 10 to 15 minutes at a time.

      or instance it's the only Linux distribution that lets you use your Floppy, CD-ROM, Zip... like under Windows.That's just not true. Lycoris lets you do the same thing; no mounting, no nothing. Just pop it in, and it'll do it for you. It'll autoplay audio cd's and even try (in my case horribly) to play the dvd's you insert.
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    21. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by shaitand · · Score: 2

      new users don't know how to access that graphical tool either. I DO THIS FOR A LIVING, I support home and buisness users both onsite and instore, occasionally I give demo's to users purchasing a pc (some new some not). There are an extremely large number of people who have own'd a pc for 7yrs and DO NOT know where add/remove programs is, let alone how to change refresh rates.

    22. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by fatboy · · Score: 2

      And unless you know exactly what you're doing (which new users don't), you're stuck staring at a monitor refreshing at 60 Hz - welcome to headache heaven!

      Sure, I can just blah blah blah - no I can't! I'm not a power user, and I'm not going to modify my X config file! Give me a fucking graphical tool for it! Windows can do it - so why can't I do it in X?


      Damn dude, get out of the 90's. Run a modern distro and you would know better than to make such an incorrect statement.

      --
      --fatboy
    23. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to flame you or something, but:

      - The existence of text config files and existence of vi doesn't mean that you have to use them. You don't change your refresh rate under windows with regedit[1], right? So why do you insist on doing so in Linux and then complaing that it is difficult for non-power users?

      - You can't download SuSE iso, period. You can download complete directory structure, but not ISOs. If you don't want boxed set, you have to master your own images, or find someone who has them.

      - From your description of this refresh rate problem it looks more like that your monitor or cable is broken (DDC support) AND you have chosen bad monitor in the list.

      XFree since 4.0 supports autodection via VESA DDC and the installers use that info! If the installer can't autodetect your monitor, it will display list of monitors and after you pick one, if will affect your refresh based on this info.

      XFree also doesn't set refresh based on resolution. It knows that given monitor is capable of handling specific frequencies and then it picks the highest possible one for it. On my machine[2], straight after installation, I got 1280x960@85Hz, _without doing anything_. And that everything was autodetected.

      So it looks like your problems are specific to your hardware, because for everyone else it just works. Try checking XFree log file, what went wrong. You (and everyone else) may be surprised.

      [1] provided you are not running Quake or other OpenGL fullscreen app of course.

      [2] ATI Radeon QW coupled with ADI Microscan 5G. I got same results with different machines, too.

    24. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by pizpot · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, get this: here at my office in Canada, our PC's are controlled by a sys admin in the USA. He recently deployed a couple hundred XP boxes with 60Hz refresh and tweaked it so you can't even right-click properties. Now he is too busy to care...

    25. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by dsfox · · Score: 2

      It is not the least bit proprietary, all the code is in the public Wine tree. The current Codeweavers release is proprietary.

    26. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Mandrake? by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      I've got the same thing at the school lab I have to do my VB.NET homework in. It's a new policy, though, up to about 2 weeks ago users could tweak all the display settings no problem. As an added bonus, certain machines are now no longer able to connect as "Debugger User", so I'm no longer able to use the fantastic debugger which is IMHO Visual Studio's only selling point (other than that it's the only DE that allows me to program in VB, but that's not something I'd do by choice).

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  30. Low price is great. But whay about service? by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remeber the hype of emachines? They were medicro PC's for a reasonable price. Reasonable until there was a technical challenge. Hopefully these won't see the same negative consumer backlash. The Linux community can not afford the humiliation. I fear the "not-us" technical pit.

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
    1. Re:Low price is great. But whay about service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      emachines worked well for a lot of people as a first computer. If the power supplies weren't junk they would have done even better. BTW I still run into MANY people using Pentium 133s with Win95! They aren't geeks, but they are proof the Internet Appliance was always a viable market if the "appliance" was a basic PC. As their needs evolve they upgrade.

  31. American mentality by monkeySauce · · Score: 1

    I think the success of this thing is most about the sticker price. I think it is the primary factor in many purchasing decisions Americans make. Whether it has windows/linux intel/via isn't much less important than "yeah, I think I can swing $200 to get a computer"

    That's why walmart itself is such a big success... they may not carry the nicest of anything, but they sure do sell it cheap!

    1. Re:American mentality by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1

      Along the same lines, McDonalds sure isn't fine cuisine. And that primetime ABC television - what tripe! Not a single redeeming, life-altering piece on the whole channel!

      In other words, thank you captain obvious.

    2. Re:American mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true.

      we like are shit cheap and plentiful.

      god bless america!!!

    3. Re:American mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >we like are shit cheap and plentiful.

      You are like your shit, which is cheap and plentiful?

      Okely-dokely.

  32. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Who is to say that Wal Mart couldn't co-opt the whole OS for their own devices, since the code is open under the GPL?
    Because the code is open under the GPL.
  33. These are great by photon317 · · Score: 1, Troll


    If anything will begin to leech some of the masses away from the M$ world, it will be these dirt cheap low end non-intel non-ms PCs selling at WalMart. If I were rich right now, I'd dump some money into supporting these companies. They may not have the whole Windowsy-seeming-end-user-linux-setup thing perfect, but they'll get there eventually. Remember that probably 70+ % of home windows users just want to read email and browse the web, and maybe write a document from time to time.

    --
    11*43+456^2
    1. Re:These are great by photon317 · · Score: 2


      Troll? Can someone explain to me how two moderators thought this post was a troll? I can't envision it at all, even takign a contrary point of view to my post's opinions.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    2. Re:These are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, there's a whole NEW bunch of pubeless morons here now.

      I'll bet all of you are pubeless. Completely pubeless. Beavis, not only are you a buttmunch who will never score, you're completely 100% pubeless. Sigmund Freud, I've read your psychobabble garbage, and it could obviously have been written by someone completley pubeless. Milkman Dan, just your name alone is enough to prove that YOU are pubeless also, and your passive-aggressive behavior just PROVES that you are absolutely pubeless. Madonna, we've all seen the pictures. We've heard the stories. Face it, baby... you're pubeless! Kathie Lee, Kathie Lee, Kathie Lee... well, at least you have ONE person on your panel who isn't entirely pubeless. You the man, Kathie!

      Phillip... somebody who farts so much and is so brain-damaged *HAS* to be pubeless. Kosak I've already discussed. Pubeless + homosexual = pubeless homosexual. Pocket Dole, I'm not too sure about. Looks kinda pubeless to me. Not really a pleasant thought, actually. And we come again to The Pubeless Cube. What more can I say about how Pubeless the Cube is? If anybody doesn't realize it by now, they never will!!

      I don't see how the government allows Forum2000 to continue
      to operate. The last time there were so many fanatical
      pubeless people in one place, the FBI and the BATF killed
      them all "accidently." Hmm, well, sometimes accidents
      happen to publess people. Is there anyone on the Forum2000
      staff that ISN'T pubeless? This makes me sick.

      Pubeless, pubeless, pubeless!!!!!

    3. Re:These are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. The pubeless crowd just keeps coming and coming. I haven't seen a group of people this pubeless since.... since I visited Forum 2000 yesterday.

      Well, let's take it one by one.

      I'll bet all of you are pubeless. Completely pubeless.

      Tux... I love Linux, and I love you, but I'm sorry man..... you're PUBELESS.

      Randal, I don't know who you are. But you're in black and white. Which probably means you're pubeless.

      Sophia... that's a very pubeless name. I don't know who YOU are either, but you look VERY pubeless to me.

      Richard Simmons... oh come ON. I knew HE was pubeless back in grade school! Yeah, in second grade they devoted an entire day to teaching "Richard Simmons in pubeless" even though we *ALREADY* knew!!!

      Harry Potter, I've already covered. He's pubeless.

      Al Gore, oh PLEASE. PLEASE. You have "pubeless" written on your forehad.

      Garth Brooks, my parents like you, so I'll leave you alone.

      VENTURA. You little prick. I hate you. For many reasons. The fact that you're pubeless is not the reason I hate you. But you ARE pubeless. That's one of the man things not to like about you. I hope when you're in hell, there'll be a lot of other pubeless people there.

      The Pubeless Cube...... PUBELESS!!

      I don't see how the government allows Forum2000 to continue
      to operate. The last time there were so many fanatical
      pubeless people in one place, the FBI and the BATF killed
      them all "accidently." Hmm, well, sometimes accidents
      happen to publess people. Is there anyone on the Forum2000
      staff that ISN'T pubeless? This makes me sick.

      Pubeless, pubeless, pubeless!!!!!

  34. Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most PCs are used for one of two things: games or "web & word". This computer won't help people in the first group, but for the second group it does everything they want at a much lower cost than the alternatives. Of course they buy it,

  35. Re:(*o*) How do they pick the person ?? by zapfie · · Score: 1

    Your write-up probably wasn't as good.

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  36. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    A fox crossing a river on the back of a chicken? Good god, man! Get your story straight! It is a scorpion on the back of a turtle! At least a duck would make more sense than a CHICKEN!!!

  37. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wal-Mart is pure evil.

    That is all.

  38. Cluster? by sonetsst · · Score: 0

    gosh think of a Beowulf Cluster of these!
    oh wait...

  39. Just one pertinent question here: by dzym · · Score: 2
    What exactly were their expectations for sales of these machines? :)

    They would have exceeded at least some expectations by selling maybe 100 of these. :)

  40. People don't care if it's linux by The_Mutato · · Score: 1, Troll

    >it seems customers don'd mind all >that much if their computer does not run Windows >and doesn't carry an Intel processor. Well, that's news. If someone is desperate enough to buy a PC from walmart (I wouldn't buy it even though it has linux) then I guess Joe Average doesn't care about it as long as it can go on the "Innur-Net". But I can imagine Joe Average saying "LINdows?" is that a new version of windows? Is it newer than Windows Ecks-Pea? What does this shiny button do? Etc. Etc.

    1. Re:People don't care if it's linux by Maul · · Score: 3, Insightful
      While the average shopper at Walmart is more than likely not a kernel hacker, it is SLIGHTLY unfair to believe that the average Walmart shopper is THAT dumb.


      What does, concern me, however is the security of Lindows boxes. Most "average" users, while not complete idiots, don't often understand concepts behind the "root" user, security exploits, etc.
      Hopefully the default Lindows install has been secured reasonably.


      The problem exists with Windows machines, as well.
      However, if a major security hole is found and exploited on these Lindows machines, Microsoft's PR department WILL use it to try to destroy the credibility of Linux as a whole.

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  41. Bingo! by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For most people, who just want to e-mail their friends and surf the web, the machines are more than powerful enough.

    My grand-dad went to buy a computer at a big chain store. He just wanted to look around on the web and email some friends/family. The sales droid tried to sell him a P4 2Ghz with all the bells and whistles. I ended up putting to gether a Duron 1.2G for $250 that does all he wants to do. Unless you are a big game freak or a geek (like most of us), people just don't need that much computing power.

    1. Re:Bingo! by efflux · · Score: 1

      Unless you are a big game freak or a geek (like most of us), people just don't need that much computing power.
      Of course, one doesn't need the top of the line computing power since computers have been able to play high-quality full-screen movies.

      It was multimedia that fueled the need for better hardware in the 90's.

      There may be a new medium that will take over from here, but I don't see it on the horizon yet.

      I think people will become more interested in longevity now, more than anything else.

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    2. Re:Bingo! by iabervon · · Score: 2

      For that matter, geeks frequently don't need much computing power on all of their machines. There are a lot of applications (firewall, mail/web/name server, music machine, etc.) for which you would like an extra machine that doesn't need much power. And some geeks don't have enough extra computers lying around to use.

    3. Re:Bingo! by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Duron 1.2G with even a decent graphics card (gf2mx, radeon 8500, maybe?) is fine for even a bit modest gamer.

      System like that (and I have one myself, haven't really got a budget to updgrade to latest and finest all the time) will play games just fine, even the latest and newest ones, as long as you don't have the weird urge to have all display quality and resolution settings at maximum.

    4. Re:Bingo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sales droid's entire job responsibility is to sell the higher priced product.

      More specifically, the job of the sales person is to create revenue that represents a gain over the revenue for the same period in the previous fiscal year.

      If a sales person does not sell MORE than he sold last month/quarter/year, he is not succeeding, at least not in the way he is measured by management.

      I do not believe this model is sustainable, but it is the model on which retail operates.

    5. Re:Bingo! by dublin · · Score: 2

      My grand-dad went to buy a computer at a big chain store. He just wanted to look around on the web and email some friends/family. The sales droid tried to sell him a P4 2Ghz with all the bells and whistles. I ended up putting to gether a Duron 1.2G for $250 that does all he wants to do. Unless you are a big game freak or a geek (like most of us), people just don't need that much computing power.

      Hear, hear. For all practical purposes, once we passed 300 MHz, it's been impossible to tell a difference in performance from a user perspective.

      This is especially true with a relatively lightweight OSes like Win98/SE/ME and contemporary versions of applications like Office 97. I can't believe I'm saying that, but sadly, Linux is now far more of a resource pig than 9x, especially with the incredibly obese Gnome environment and other bloat that's been thrown in over the past couple of years in the mad rush to ape Microsoft. (The days of Linux running on machines like my 75 MHz 16MB Libretto are over, which is why it's stuck on Mandrake 7.1 with the older, much slimmer KDE, which it runs just fine, thank you.)

      Sadly, both Windows and most current Linux distros expect 500+ MHz CPUs and 128 MB+ or RAM, which is just ridicuous - that's far more power than most full 3D Sun or SGI workstations had just a few years ago.

      Win9x has its warts, that's for sure, but it runs great on slow hardware, as do older versions of Linux. (Sure, it's possible to build a slim Linux distro on your own, but almost all of us have better things to do with our time...)

      For 99.5% of computer users, Win9x will do all they need - browsing, e-mail, and light document production. It also has the substantial advantages of having copies available all over the place (legitimate, cheap, used copies, even), and the bigger advantage of interoperating seamlessly with the rest of the world, something that's still not true for Linux and its associated office apps, which is why I prefer a Windows desktop with Unix extensions rather than the other way around - one way works flawlessly, the other is a constant battle.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  42. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Kenja · · Score: 1
    "Am I supposed to be unhappy at paying lower prices from an efficient company? Am I supposed to be angry because Wal-Mart doesn't charge me more?"

    No, your suposed to feel like sh*t for being happy to pay less for a product made by [close to] slave labor. Why should others suffer so you can get lower prices?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  43. Cajun zydeco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who buys these? cajun zygeco mississippi rednecks? louisiana memphis tennessee mississippi riverside wankers?

  44. Re:In Soviet Russia..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 Redundant

    and stupid, both times.

  45. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hilarious.... not

  46. So what... by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1, Troll

    This is news? Come on...
    When is big daddy $Billy G. going to buy Wal Mart. Thats news.

    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
    1. Re:So what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walmart is bigger than microsoft now.

  47. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about time.
    (and I'm rather drunk...)

  48. Yes, it is. by Andorion · · Score: 1

    I know and have spoken to enough 'non-computer' people to understand the influence of the media (and a strong brand name) on them. At the mention of a computer with an AMD processor, they get this dubious look in their eyes, and become hesitant. It's ingrained in them that INTEL makes THE PROCESSORS, and the other guys 'try to do the same thing.'

    -Berj

    1. Re:Yes, it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that these PCs ship with "Lindows", do you really think that the customers care about if it's the Brand Name or the knockoff?

  49. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    " In Soviet Russia, people describe these as full powered and low fledged!"

    Stop talking about my penis.

  50. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still wondering why the chicken crossed the river. Was it stapled to the fox?

  51. but the implications are big... by ryochiji · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is further proof that PCs (hardware and software) are becoming commodity goods. Customers don't care about bells and whistles, they just want to browse the web and do email. The really scary thing is, people are starting to realize that you don't need expensive hardware and software to do the basic things most people do.

    I think this is an excellent opportunity for small PC manufacturers, and maybe even OpenSource projects, to get their feet in customers' doors. And big vendors (cough Microsoft cough) should be afraid. Very afraid.

    1. Re:but the implications are big... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3
      "I think this is further proof that PCs (hardware and software) are becoming commodity goods. Customers don't care about bells and whistles, they just want to browse the web and do email. The really scary thing is, people are starting to realize that you don't need expensive hardware and software to do the basic things most people do."

      I think this is scary because people like us who actually need/use higher end hardware will end up paying more. If only the cheap hardware market moves units in large numbers, then higher end, quality products will be manufactured in smaller numbers and be harder to come by.

      If I want to build a super-reliable desktop now adays, I have to buy a very high end hard drive in the SCSI range if I want to get a decent warranty. Ever notice that all the reasonably priced network cards have cheapo Realtek chipsets? Cases are really cheap and I want a good one, I probably have to send CAD$200+ to get an aluminium one with good airflow and slots for HDD cooling fans. Server quality mobos aren't exactly cheap either.

      I'm just saying that the commoditisation of the hardware market will make things harder for users who really do need pro quality equipment.

    2. Re:but the implications are big... by charon.de · · Score: 1

      "If I want to build a super-reliable desktop now adays, I have to buy a very high end hard drive in the SCSI range if I want to get a decent warranty. Ever notice that all the reasonably priced network cards have cheapo Realtek chipsets? Cases are really cheap and I want a good one, I probably have to send CAD$200+ to get an aluminium one with good airflow and slots for HDD cooling fans. Server quality mobos aren't exactly cheap either."

      You don't need SCSI drives or a eepro/3com NIC in a desktop.
      Of course, I have all of them in this box, but I read /.;)

    3. Re:but the implications are big... by _typo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I'm just saying that the commoditisation of the hardware market will make things harder for users who really do need pro quality equipment.

      I don't think this is true. this "commoditisation of the hardware market" will only make the percentage of pro-quality equipment drop but the raw number will probably increase. Think about it. More people using low-end hardware means more people wanting better stuff.

      As for your SCSI disk example, just think how much you'd have to pay for a 0,5 GB slow and unreliable disk a few years ago. Alot more than you do now.

      The increase in the price of pro-equipment is only hapenning because you're changing that definition to mean server-class stuff, since that's becoming afordable today. Hence, prices are actually *droping* because of the massification of computer hardware. There's no indication that that won't continue.

      --

      Pedro Côrte-Real.

    4. Re:but the implications are big... by platypus · · Score: 2

      I think this is scary because people like us who actually need/use higher end hardware will end up paying more.

      The best example for that are IMO ink jet printers. I can't convince any of my computer illiterate friend to not buy an el cheapo hp color printer, because they really don't care any more about price of cartridges.

      They tell me that they will just buy a new printer if the cartridge is empty. Unfortunately, I fear HP thought of that strategy and adapted the fill level of the cartridges in new printers.

      And similtanously, good non-toy color inkjets get more and more expensive.

    5. Re:but the implications are big... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      1. Realtek chipset network cards aren't that bad. I use them for my home lan almost exclusively.

      2. High end ATA will always have the 3 year warantee (e.g. MaxLine II Maxtor). If you want small capacity and long warantee, you are SOL though currently.

      3. They aren't aluminium, but Evercase cases from newegg are surprisingly high quality for their price. Fan over the CPU mounts on even the low end ones, extra drive bays on the floor of the case (you can mount something like 6 internal hard disks even in their second cheapest model). They even have a mount for a drive bay fan on the lower internal drive carriage.

      I understand your point, about a dichotomy developing in the market, and what you say may become more true, but right now a lot of the examples you cited have useful workarounds for those in the know.

      HTH.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:but the implications are big... by Elentar · · Score: 1

      Massification? That's got to be the strangest real word I've seen on Slashdot in a long time.

      -Elentar

      --
      The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
    7. Re:but the implications are big... by axxackall · · Score: 2
      If I want to build a super-reliable desktop now adays, I have to buy a very high end hard drive in the SCSI range if I want to get a decent warranty.

      Don't you know about mke2fs -j ? Don't you know about mirroring of 2 cheap disks?

      First thing you need for computer reliability is your brains. Money and high-end things are secondary.

      --

      Less is more !
    8. Re:but the implications are big... by jbolden · · Score: 2

      I think the increase in the number of servers caused by an increase in the number of desktops will counter this. Basically what you are saying is you want a server class desktop. Just buy server hardware.

    9. Re:but the implications are big... by jbolden · · Score: 2

      And similtanously, good non-toy color inkjets get more and more expensive.

      And why would you want one? Have you checked out the prices on used color lasers lately? Ink jets are repeating what happened in the black and white world, they owned the bottom tear while the laser came down in price and owned everything else.

    10. Re:but the implications are big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "want to browse the web and do email."

      I have to agree about the limited requirements
      of the typical user. My wife uses only email,
      a stock monitor and a webbrowser on a circa
      est1995 sparc station 20(debiansparc). She doesn't
      need or crave anything more. And the things up
      time is like 85 days. You can taylor unix machines
      strictly to user requirements soo... much easier
      than a windows box.

    11. Re:but the implications are big... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Don't you know about mke2fs -j ? Don't you know about mirroring of 2 cheap disks? First thing you need for computer reliability is your brains. Money and high-end things are secondary."

      I would set up a Type 1 RAID before I did something like that. But still, I would have two cheap drives instead of one. The chance of data loss would be lower, but in the long run, the chance of having a failed hard drive would be higher. It would also futher commoditize (sp?) the hard drive market because I would be buying into the high quantity / low quality business model that is being pushed.

      Sorry, I say quality over quantity and I am willing to pay for it.

    12. Re:but the implications are big... by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      if you want super-reliable and high throughput, why even bother with commodity 32 bit Wintel crap? Get on eBay and buy a nice 64 bit "real computer" with maybe 1/3 the cpu speed of an Intel PC with comparable throughput, ultra-SCSI & 100Mbit networking built in, the ability to boot form any partition on the hard disk (or boot from tape or the network if need be), ability to support multiple graphics cards, industrial grade power supplies, and disks that can (usually, knock on wood) spin for 7+ years with no problems.

    13. Re:but the implications are big... by IntlHarvester · · Score: 2

      I don't think this is true. this "commoditisation of the hardware market" will only make the percentage of pro-quality equipment drop but the raw number will probably increase.

      That was true in the boom years of the 1990s, but it wasn't true in the stagnent 1980s. Then, the high-end (think UNIX Workstations, Macs, etc) got faster but also more and more expensive. Meanwhile, the low-end (think 8086 or 286-based PCs) never got any faster and only gradually got cheaper.

      The fact that you could buy a new XT-type 8086-based PC from IBM in 1990, tells you that without compelling power-hungry software, there's no real nead for the hardware to progressively faster. I think this $200 Via chip thing is likely the start of a trend.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    14. Re:but the implications are big... by nyseal · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I agree entirely with the generalization that most people just want to surf the web, email and have word processing. The vicious circle of software, hardware, software, hardware usually stems from (I believe) people discovering what they can do with their computers and various software applications. My dad (who has an issue just logging on to the PC) completely hates it; however when he discovered through a magazine he subscribes that he could buy a software program that lets him fly virtual RC planes (he builds them as a hobby), he went NUTS! You can crash the plane and not have to rebuild it! YEAHH! He figured he may as well use that $1200 piece of 'junk' in the den for something useful; albeit to him. He purchased the software, I installed and configured for him (no small task with XP) and now he's happy as a clam and wanting to find out more. Point being, these programs generally need specific requirements which don't come on stripped down PCs (video, audio and memory). I think the general populous is moving to higher end systems because they HAVE to; not that they NEED to. Just my 2 cents.

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    15. Re:but the implications are big... by TCaM · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if the realtek chipsets have a bad rep or not, but I have used dozens of realtek based cards with various linux distros, win2k,winnt and win9x and have had very good luck with them and ZERO hardware failures. On the other hand I've had shitloads of trouble with 3c509 and 3c90x series cards from 3Com.

    16. Re:but the implications are big... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great point

    17. Re:but the implications are big... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Realtek sells their chipsets to anyone who wants them, and some of the manufacturers ARE going to use them to make products that are utter junk.

      There are helluva lot cards out there with realtek chipsets, some of them work, others don't - and the whole chipset gets bad reputation because of those that don't. Too bad it's hard to know which one you are getting when buying.

      3Com and Intel etc are probably more safe things to buy - if you've got the money - they are always the same, and not made by your INSERT RANDOM EL-CHEAPO CRAP MANUFACTURER THERE, you know what you are getting. I've had some trouble with 3C509 too, but everyone has shitloads of trouble with ISA crap, good you don't see much of that these days...

    18. Re:but the implications are big... by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seems people see Moore's law, etc., and expect continued development. I see a plateau, where human proportions have brought us to a point where a bit of stagnation will be ok.

      For faster stuff and bigger storage, we are getting into the next level of application, mostly Entertainment.

      But even the typical consumer pc has gotten to the point where, the human's attention span exceeds the wait for any operation they use the machine for, where the storage is enough for anything they're likely to create (again, let's don't worry about the next level -- video -- because that falls into Entertainment).

      For all the stuff that we really *need* computers for (replace the typewriter, the check register, and the cookbook), the 1990 PC fell short of the needed capacity to meet the human proportions: It lacked the storage capacity to comfortably store everything a user would write, or a really huge cookbook; operations would take seconds or minutes to complete, etc.)

      Today we've converged at a point where human proportions allow a plateau. Now, we begin a new cycle where the application is Entertainment. So we need A/V. Faster computers, bigger storage. But no matter how much faster and bigger they get, we already reached a point where the old-skool apps WORK in a sense that they did NOT work (but almost did) 10 years ago.

      Always keep in mind that we're talking about PERSONAL computers here. Not Business or Technical computers. Entertainment/Multimedia falls into this category. All the stuff we wanted the PC for in 1990, we can actually do now. Without waiting 5 minutes for the wordprocesor to load. Without worrying about storage space for reasonable stuff.

      In short, we have the PC today that IBM said the 286 was. It's just now starting to be practical!

      We NEEDED gigabyte drives, Tens of Megs of RAM, back then. But that does not necessarily mean we need more now. We're just now to the point where the application requirements of 1990 are met, and we're indifferent, because we've thought of a whole new set of requirements... Entertainment.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    19. Re:but the implications are big... by lactose99 · · Score: 2

      If you're going to use RAID 1, why not just use IDE-RAID? SCSI's main calling is reliability, but if you are going to be using disk mirroring anyway just use cheaper/bigger IDE disks. You can probably buy 2 80GB disks and a hardware ATA133-RAID controller for the price of one 36GB SCSI-3 disk.

      You can have both quality and quantity if you know how to minimize the risks.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    20. Re:but the implications are big... by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      I agree that the "Personal Computer" is pretty much done.

      However, I'm not sure if entertainment needs will drive the next wave in personal computing. It's just as likely that specialized PC-like Media Consumption Terminals (such as Tivo and XBox) will become the next adoption wave, and due to specialized software, the 'wait' that we've conqured in PCs won't be a problem. PCs then become an extention of the broader consumer electronics market, and that includes demands placed on CPUs, hard drives, and so on.

      (Note that I say "PC-like", because depite the hw, these things will be DRMed to hell and (worse) will not be end-user programmable.)

      On the other hand, for what the 80s lacked in Moore's Law, it made up for in creative hardware designs. Hopefully a hardware stagnation will inspire the range of stuff we saw back then, rather than just turning everything from your TV to your Oven into a casterated 80%-IBM-compatible PC.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    21. Re:but the implications are big... by axxackall · · Score: 2
      With journalling file system the simple mirrorring (RAID-1) is more than enough. The mirrorring will protect you from hardware failure of a disk, while journalling will help in software failure situations.

      By the way, SCSI by itself will not help, unless you do RAID-N of more than 1 disks. You need SCSI for linear performance, not for safity.

      --

      Less is more !
    22. Re:but the implications are big... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I think this is scary because people like us who actually need/use
      > higher end hardware will end up paying more. If only the cheap
      > hardware market moves units in large numbers, then higher end,
      > quality products will be manufactured in smaller numbers and be
      > harder to come by.

      This is not news. It's the attack of the killer micros all over
      again. That's what the PC was 1980: a low-end machine that can
      just about almost manage the very basic things people need, so
      they don't have to fork over the bucks for a Real Computer. As
      a result, ecconomy of scale drives the cost of microcomputers
      down and the quality up, while minicomputers languish. "No one
      will survive the attack of the killer micros." That's what
      happened to DEC. Does that mean the people who needed the power
      of a minicomputer ten years ago are paying more now?

      Don't worry about it. As the low-end micros get smaller and
      cheaper and better, you'll be able to buy twenty of them and
      make yourself a cluster, with a redundant distributed filesystem,
      for everyday use -- and whenever one goes bad, you'll just hot
      swap a replacement. And they'll fit in the space a large server
      case takes up today. (No, I'm not going to put a date on this
      prediction.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  52. Return rates? by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

    I should think that in a situation such as this, we should judge value not by sales numbers, but by return rates. I would love to see a comparison between the return rates for machines preloaded with Lindows, Mac OS X, and Windows XP. Come to think of it...why haven't we seen this yet? Sure, the specific machine configurations will be different so that will play into an individual return decision, but it should still provide some useful data when combined with other things such as support call volume and other indicators of customer satisfaction. Someone should combine all these numbers and make a report like those seen for automobiles.

    -JT

  53. I use Lindows..... by dirkdidit · · Score: 5, Funny

    and I have a large penis. See there's a direct correlation there. Lindows is cheap and easy just like me!

    1. Re:I use Lindows..... by rice_web · · Score: 1

      You're a geek, of course you're easy.

      --
      The Political Programmer
  54. Joe Schmoe ain't buying it. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Folks like us are buying these with "maybe" a few clueless newbies. I kind of look at the newbies buying it as a good thing as that's who they are targetting this at. But the bulk of the folks buying these are most likely geeks that realize high GHz CPUs aren't everything and these would work great as a MP3 server, firewall, router, or whatever when they open it and tweak it by throwing in a bigger HD or a couple network cards. Why buy a old machine to do this when these are only 200 bucks.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Joe Schmoe ain't buying it. by travail_jgd · · Score: 2

      Why buy a old machine to do this when these are only 200 bucks.

      That's an interesting point -- what will the ultra-cheap PC do to the used PC market?

      A computer shop near me sells used and refurbished machines. "Complete" Pentium computers including HD, video, modem, Windows, etc (without monitor) were 100-200 dollars (US). And Pentium means Pentium 1, under 233 Mhz.

      Anyone with a clue is going to buy the new cheapo PC and "transfer" the Windows license.

    2. Re:Joe Schmoe ain't buying it. by ameoba · · Score: 2

      The used computer market has always been a strange one. On one hand, you've got the knowlegable geeks who just want to give stuff a good home & know what the product is really worth, selling things for next to nothing. On the other, you've got people trying to sell their 5 year old machines for almost-new prices.

      Most businesses I've seen that stock used computer equipment tend to unreasonably inflate the price on used hardware. I think for many of them, it's a bait & switch tactic. If the older, slower, used hardware is ridiculously overpriced, it's far easier to upsell the customer to a new machine for 'only a little bit more'.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    3. Re:Joe Schmoe ain't buying it. by travail_jgd · · Score: 2

      One thing Wal-Mart is notorious for is driving smaller competitors out of business. Selling new computers for cheaper than older systems would put a lot of pressure on local businesses. One thing is certain IMHO -- Wal-Mart wouldn't be selling these systems if they didn't think they could make a profit.

      You're right about the used market though. More than once, I've gotten a laugh from reading the classifieds and seeing old systems going for the price of a new one.

    4. Re:Joe Schmoe ain't buying it. by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      "I think for many of them, it's a bait & switch tactic."

      It's a pawn-shop thing.
      Whatever the original retail price for an item was, that'll be the price tag in a pawn shop.

      Thing is, where a retail store is almost never open to negotiation, a pawn shop ALWAYS is.

      So they set the asking price at the retail price (sometimes higher!), and if some moron pays it, they'll take his money. But if you haggle, they'll haggle.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  55. Mini-ITX by g4dget · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Judging by the specs, the Walmart machines are actually Mini ITX machines. Walmart's price is very good: ordinarily, you pay close to $200 for just the motherboard, power supply, and enclosure; Walmart throws in the memory, keyboard, CD-ROM, mouse, disk, and speakers. Their margins must be very thin.

    And, for better or for worse, despite the carping of usability engineers and the whining of Microsoft zealots, if they run Gnome/KDE, Mozilla, and OpenOffice on it, end users will have a software experience not too different from Windows with Microsoft Office.

  56. Imagine . . . your OS controlled by Wal-Mart? by aaronhurd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, $200 for a computer that does the things that most people need sounds great, and I'm excited to see it selling well. In fact, I am considering buying one to set up as a general purpose linux box.

    One must remember, however, that Wal-Mart is a large corporation just like Microsoft . . . and it has a history of pouring money into stores and selling inventory at a loss to kill off competition. Though I doubt it may happen any time soon, if large numbers of users start flocking to the "Wal-Mart" PC, Microsoft may lose its footing in the operating system market, but would a market dominated by Wal-Mart be healthy?

    Just something to think about.

    1. Re:Imagine . . . your OS controlled by Wal-Mart? by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      It won't be dominated by Wal-Mart because Linux is free. If Dell and Gateway see a profit in selling computers with Linux (probably Mandrake or Lindows) even though they would have to pay more for Windows, then Wal-Mart would have competitors. Of course, "if MS loses" is a big if.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
  57. Good machines for non-desktop use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    While people bash the low cost hardware, I think it is important to point out the good things relating to these machines, specifically the via C3 processor. Low energy use, low heat production. Slap a large heat sink on the processor, and you have yourself a decent, very quiet, low energy consuming, low cost server/firewall/mp3 player/dvd player (once you add a dvd rom).

    Maybe this is why tech enthusiasts are buyin them. As well, does anyone know what board is in it? Could this maybe a mini-itx board? That could provide even more fun for tech enthusiasts who want to make crazy pc's in odd items.

    1. Re:Good machines for non-desktop use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like the same mini-itx board they have at Fry's. I didn't see anyway to mount a heat sink on the one they had on display. The CPU is soldered direct to the motherboard too. Still, my guess is it doesn't need on, you probably get more heat from the hard disk.

    2. Re:Good machines for non-desktop use by codeMonkeyWannabe · · Score: 1

      The board in it is a VIA GA-6EVM. It has the VIA PLE133T
      chipset. Someone posted some crap about the CPU being
      soldered on or something. That's a bunch of phooey. It's
      a Socket 370 so the C3 can be replaced with a P3 or Celery.
      It actually has quite a few modern features. I'd say the
      worst thing about the unit as a whole is the integrated
      video. It's a Trident Blade3D Pro Media. Ack. It can really
      drag down KDE 3.x sometimes. Yeah, I bought one of these
      a couple months ago and am now running Redhat 7.3 on it
      and using it as a firewall, dev machhine, backup server,
      ogg and mpg over network dispenser. For $200 + shipping,
      I think it was a good deal.

  58. TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all should know by now that $199 + free OS (and other free applications) costs more than a $700 PC and a $1000 in software.

  59. That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But once they figure out the computers don't run Windows they're gonna start returning them!

  60. The Via CPU is Really Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I bought one in September to eval.

    The 800 Mhz Via CPU is roughly equivalent to a 400 Mhz Celeron.

    I popped in a 1.2 Ghz Celeron for $62 and it runs Much Better.

    The 10 GB drive is also Very slow.

    I could have built a much better machine for a little more money. Still, it isn't a bad deal.

    I booted Lindows and took a quick look before blowing it away. It was really cheesy, with major pieces requiring additional purchase.

    1. Re:The Via CPU is Really Slow by pthisis · · Score: 2

      The 800 Mhz Via CPU is roughly equivalent to a 400 Mhz Celeron.

      Which is still _way_ overkill for someone who just does a little word processing and web surfing. Somewhere between 100-200 Mhz computers got to the "fast enough" point for those tasks. Lots of people need more power, even on the desktop--gamers, some spreadsheets, people who want to watch videos, etc--but for a surprisingly large number of people the upgrade cycle ended 4 years ago.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    2. Re:The Via CPU is Really Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You apparently have not run Mozilla recently.

      It is a pig on my 700 Mhz Athlon.

    3. Re:The Via CPU is Really Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While Mozilla's engine is excellent, its user interface is trash. It's awfully slow at saving downloaded files (such as images) on my >1.0 ghz Linux box. Download a browser based on the Mozilla rendering engine instead. Or download Konqueror or Opera. They are free.

    4. Re:The Via CPU is Really Slow by shepd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >The 800 Mhz Via CPU is roughly equivalent to a 400 Mhz Celeron.

      After using one of these, I think you're underrating the CPU by a lot.

      You forgot that when you're talking Cyrix, you're talking a big difference between application performance, and number crunching performance.

      Number crunching on a C3 is pathetic. Application performance on a C3 800 is about equivalent to a PIII 550, IMHO. The C3 666 plays DVDs handsomely, and there's no way they'd play well on a Celeron 300...

      And while you're saving on the computer, you also save on electricity. I'm very disappointed that so few laptop manufacturers have considered this chip. IIRC, it uses about 1/4 the power the power of an Athlon, and produces so little heat it can be relatively easily passively cooled.

      In other words, a silent, cheap, laptop that doesn't burn your legs or your wallent, and lasts an entire trip from anywhere on the world to anywhere, all at the expense of some CPU power. Sounds cool to me.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:The Via CPU is Really Slow by rsborg · · Score: 2
      You apparently have not run Mozilla recently.
      It is a pig on my 700 Mhz Athlon.

      Try the Phoenix project instead. It really is decent, even on my slow-as-hell P!!! 500.

      And it's mozilla, too.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    6. Re:The Via CPU is Really Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Sounds cool to me.'

      pun intended?

    7. Re:The Via CPU is Really Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >pun intended?

      you're getting warmer... :-)

    8. Re:The Via CPU is Really Slow by Zigg · · Score: 2

      That's funny, because it's great on my 333 MHz Pentium II.

    9. Re:The Via CPU is Really Slow by jafuser · · Score: 2
      I could have built a much better machine for a little more money. Still, it isn't a bad deal.

      Still, that's the point. $200 is a hard threshold for a lot of people.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  61. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by dbrutus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No, you're supposed to be mad that Walmart sweat shop goods are made by companies offering wages at higher than local scale. The fact is that if sweat shops disappeared, prices on goods would go up and wages in these countries would go *down*. That's just plain inhumane.

  62. meet the Lindows by ChristTrekker · · Score: 5, Funny

    With apologies to Hanna-Barbera...

    Lindows
    Meet the Lindows
    You're the modern Wal-Mart family
    Prices
    Are bottom rock
    You're making Linux history
    Let's force
    Microsoft to retreat
    This cheap
    PC is so 31337!
    When you're
    Using Lindows
    You can play all your Windows games
    It still looks the same
    You drive Bill Gates insane!

  63. The price leader by Animats · · Score: 2

    It's the cheapest machine out there. That's enough to push a lot of them out the door. Especially via WalMart, which likes to have a solid lowest-price entry in every category.

  64. But do they even know? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll bet 70% of the people buying the WalMart machines think they have Pentiums in them!! After all, they've been conditioned to accept that all computers have Pentium processors... it's only if you explicitly say "this does NOT have a Pentium" that you get those funny looks and people start to doubt. Most people think Macs have Pentiums - go ahhead and ask!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:But do they even know? by Andorion · · Score: 1

      Stop, stop!!! You're ruining my faith in humanity =(

      -Berj

    2. Re:But do they even know? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Stop, stop!!! You're ruining my faith in humanity =(

      Yes, Andorion, there _is_ a Santa Claus. Only you're getting a piece of coal.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:But do they even know? by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      they've been conditioned to accept that all computers have Pentium processors...

      They don't know what a processor is.
      It has big numbers?
      Big numbers are better then small numbers right?

    4. Re:But do they even know? by hobbes37 · · Score: 1

      You have faith in humanity!?

  65. It's alot of hardware for $199 by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    So I bought one. It came with Lindows 2.0.0, but I'm running RedHat 8.0 on it (Lindows is junk!)
    It also has Windows drivers on CD-ROM if you plan to go that route. Either way, it's alot of hardware for only $199.

    All and all, it's a good 2nd PC for a firewall or Linux toy box!

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  66. Re: Who on /. uses this hunk of junk? Me! by x00101010x · · Score: 5, Informative

    I bought one when my AMD K6-2 450 finally died and it's case was donated to my cats (they love old cases). Anyways, I just wanted a cheap system to turn into a simple home server. It works perfect. I've got it running RH8.0, Samba, a firewall/gateway setup using IPTables, DHCP server and I'll soon be adding some MP3 streaming so I can listen to MP3's all over the house. It has yet to dissapoint me, despite the lag when I'm on it (since I'm only actually on it 4 hours a week or so for tweaking). All in all, it's a great warm body machine (for when anything w/ a pulse will do).

    --
    DONT PANIC
  67. Pretty obvious why it matters by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

    If someone is buying a Lindows box at Wal-Mart, it's very unlikely they have the knowledge or desire to seek out the parts and figure out how to build their own PC.

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  68. Wal*Mart people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they are smart enough to run a Lindows PC. I don't think KMart people would be able to do it. Hell, they can't even keep thier stores in business.

  69. I told you Lindows was for real by dh003i · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I don't remember which post I put it in, but I did say somewhere this: Lindows is for real. They do good business, smart business: (1) Naming their product to sound like Windows attracts Windows users; (2) Making it look like OSX in ways attracts Mac users and the general public; (3) Website designed like Apple's website -- makes it easy to use, and familiar; (4) Debian-based -- couldn't base it on a better, more stable, distro; (5) Making deals with big-time players like Walmart. In short, these guys make good business decisions.

    In response to a few criticisms of Lindows proprietary software:
    1. The only proprietary thing that I can find is Lindows slick upgrading utility (Click-'n-Run), which can easily be replaced by apt-get or a apt-get GUI. Does anyone here think that people are going to pay the high price for Click-'n-run after it expires? Not likely. If you're worried about the new user being swayed by proprietary software, you don't have to worry about Click-'n-Run -- few will pay for that service. So, thus, its up to you to educate them about FS/OSS.

    2. Yes, it runs as root. So does Windows. The average computer user doesn't want to bother to distinguish between root and user. If they do, they want it to be simple and graphical, like OSX's system is. I'd say that until a user is intelligent enough to understand why (s)he shouldn't be running in root, they shouldn't. You learn by experience. This is also a call for the FS/OSS world to develop some good anti-virus software: even if you run in user, you're still not invulnerable to viri.

    3. No, they haven't offered the source or ISO online for free download. Why? They actually have a real business plan, which doesn't include giving away their product for free (as in beer). In other words, they have a plan to make money, and have obviously learned from dot.bomb. Giving away your product and hoping people will buy it anyways is not a good business model (RedHat has been successful because they sell support services). It is fine and dandy for non-profit projects like Debian to give things away for free (i.e., their updates), but they aren't trying to make money. Even Debian doesn't put their official ISO online because it would require huge amounts of space/bandwidth, and they want to encourage people to buy the $5 Debian CD's.

    Quite frankly, I think Lindows is the best chance to topple the MS empire, because of the software itself and the business plan/model behind it. Once people are using Lindows, its a few steps from there to more traditional GNU/Linux distros.

    Lindows is, quite frankly, very easy to use -- even for newbies. You can't underestimate how important that is for the typical user. Remember, your parents even have a hard time using Windows or MacOS!
    1. Re:I told you Lindows was for real by crawling_chaos · · Score: 3, Informative
      Even Debian doesn't put their official ISO online because it would require huge amounts of space/bandwidth,

      Uh, really? Debian Official ISO Mirrors

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    2. Re:I told you Lindows was for real by dh003i · · Score: 2

      Obviously, I was wrong. It happens once in a while. :-)

    3. Re:I told you Lindows was for real by Macgoon · · Score: 1

      (1) Naming their product to sound like Windows attracts Windows users; (2) Making it look like OSX in ways attracts Mac users and the general public Do you really think Mac users are interested in anything but a Mac? Lindows might very well appeal to a dimbulb, but few of those would be Mac users.

    4. Re:I told you Lindows was for real by b_pretender · · Score: 2
      My commentary on your post:
      (1) Naming their product to sound like Windows attracts Windows users; (2) Making it look like OSX in ways attracts Mac users and the general public; (3) Website designed like Apple's website -- makes it easy to use, and familiar; (4) Debian-based -- couldn't base it on a better, more stable, distro; (5) Making deals with big-time players like Walmart. In short, these guys make good business decisions.


      (1) Windows naming. I'll go along with that.
      (2) Making it look like OSX attracts Mac users??? OSX is so new that NOBODY is familiar enough with it to feel comfortable on a cheap-PC. Also, 99.999% of OS X users realize that their GUI is different and better than Windows and they aren't likely to be *fooled* into using a Lindows ripoff.
      (3) Good design attracts users (or at least it keeps users, which is close enough). I'm willing to go along with this point.
      (4) I can't comment on Debian being the most stable distro. My 6 years of Linux experience consists entirely of Redhat and I've never needed to look elsewhere for more stability.
      (5) Making deals with big name players will move machines. That's for sure.

      I agree that the strategies that you list are the best way to gain marketshare (I won't naively admit that MS could ever "topple" as you do). Once they have a 5% or so marketshare, then they can worry about people running as root and more proprieatary programs. Until then, just be the cheapest and get the job done. For the record, as you probably agree, I don't think that they need to ever release ISOs of their distribution for download. Just release the sourcecode whereever they have to in compliance with the GPL. Companies sell products. They don't give them away. AOL seems like they need a little something right now to set things straight. Acquiring Lindows might be just the thing.

    5. Re:I told you Lindows was for real by esarjeant · · Score: 2

      I couldn't agree more -- I think Lindows is making all the smart business decisions it needs to make in order to ensure the survival of their product.

      While you don't have to use Click & Run, I think it's a brilliant marketing ploy -- and it's also something that users can understand. If you want to install more software, as long as you have a subscription to the Lindows Click & Run service you can point & click to install more programs.

      Let's face it, the average computer user will benefit from the GUI-ified virtual warehouse of open source software that Lindows has pre-prepared . Running apt-get from a command prompt or launching make from a command prompt or even figuring out how to download an RPM from a command prompt is _not_ something that the _average_ user is going to want to do. While there are GUI's for most of these tools, I have not seen any of them that promote software in a way that consumers can understand.

      In other words, if you don't know what you want you're going to be fairly lost. With Click & Run, if you don't know what you want then chances are you can find something that either interests you or remotely meets some requirement you might have. Bottom line; pictures and promotional text help entice average computer users.

      As far as the root execution goes, I wasn't too thrilled about that either. Even Windows is getting pretty good with that - although the majority of users just stuff themselves into the local Administrators group anyway. Since the KDE tools are flexible enough to handle a prompt for root password whenever required, I think one can safely assume non-root day-to-day running will be feasible.

      I like the Lindows model. While I don't plan to run it myself, I know plenty of people who would be well suited to this platform. Always keep in mind that open source does not mean _free_, open source always means open source and free is your freedom to choose how you want to use that source.

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

    6. Re:I told you Lindows was for real by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      >Yes, it runs as root. So does Windows.

      Point of information: The version of Windows
      that ships today has users and user privilege features that rival those of unix. They're *different* and not as good a design in my opinion, but, I think you're comparing Linux to Windows 98; and that's not fair.

      (And this is coming from a dyed-in-the-wool Linux user since the Perot campaign!)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:I told you Lindows was for real by ites · · Score: 2

      It is a myth that Lindows has 'proprietary' software. Everything can be downloaded by FTP. The only difference from conventional FOSS projects is that you actually have to buy the product before being given the link. But it's just an anonymous FTP site and I've posted the address before on /.

      --
      Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    8. Re:I told you Lindows was for real by dh003i · · Score: 2

      I disagree w/ the implication that XP's user priviledge features rival those of unix. For one thing, setting priviledges in unix can be done quickly and to a large number of files by simple commands. But that's a matter of opinion.

      More importantly, security and priviledge features do nothing to attract new users. Remember what I said about the average user? The average user, remember, thinks that Windows and MacOS are "hard to use" and confusing.

    9. Re:I told you Lindows was for real by dh003i · · Score: 2

      Also, remember that nothing in Lindows prevents you from creating a user account separate from root. And like I said before, if users don't see the need/benefit of having an accont separate from root, then they shouldn't be doing that, for one of two reasons: (1) Maybe they don't need it; (2) Maybe they do need it but don't realize; they'll be taught when they get infected with a virus -- people learn best by mistakes.

    10. Re:I told you Lindows was for real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When I saw the dead and dying Afghani children on TV, I felt a renewed sense of national security. God Bless America."

      Shut the fuck up, you fucking hippie, or soon enough it'll be YOUR children that are dead and dying.

  70. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ducks can swim, assface.

  71. Who cares. by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1

    The company will not make any money on these. I can go out and build a $198 computer and sell it for $199, too. Does that make me a genius business man sure to bring in untold riches?

    Welcome to dot-com redux - the Next Generation of Bad Businessmen. The margin on these machines is smaller than the margin on a Chia Pet, probably, and I bet more Chia Pets get sold.

    1. Re:Who cares. by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      It does if you sell enough of them, this would be the point that the dot com managment teams missed, you can make low margins up on volume, you can't make up negative margins on volume. Incidentally, grocery stores do the equivilent of selling a $194 computer for about $199, they just do it many many times a year. This is measured on an operating basis, I assum your $198 includes your manufacturing facility and marketing and distribution costs.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:Who cares. by WetCat · · Score: 1

      Nope. The idea is two-step actually
      First, selling cheap Linux PCs. People will buy it, work with it and find that it's not so awful - to live without windows.
      Second, those people on upgrade will probably
      not hesitate to buy Linux PCs - but good ones.And THEN Wal-Mart can get all Microsoft's part of price.

    3. Re:Who cares. by zx-6e · · Score: 1

      Of course they are not going to make money on these PCs. But they will make money on the add-ons, like a monitor. A majority of buyers are will need a monitor for this system to be even remotely useful, so they just raise the price of monitors slightly and make their margins.

  72. Re:Boxes? surely you meant boxen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "boxen" in German = "to box" (as in, sports). It is a verb.

  73. And with Christmas coming by phorm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It will be definately interesting to see how well these sell, and more importantly, what the sell-to-return ratio is after Christmas. I expect a lot of people are saying "hey, cheap computer!" and putting it under the tree.

    Heck, for some guy buying a computer for his almost-never-used-a-PC-before granny/mother/aunt/etc this is a great present. Cheap, goes online, runs a word processor. They're not super-fast, but they're not retarded-slow either.

    I doubt you'll see many gamers buying these, but for those who are just trying to get some letters printed and emails sent, it's a good deal.

    1. Re:And with Christmas coming by fhage · · Score: 1
      I purchased a Mandrake Walmart PC this summer. While trying to resolve a sound configuration error that shipped with the box, the very responsive Microtel tech told me that the rate of returns for their Linux PC's were lower than that for their Windows PCs.

      These things make great PCs for schoolwork. Mine came shipped with enough games installed to make my kids very happy. It took them ( they're in 5th and 8th grade) about 10 minutes to make a full and happy transition from Windows to KDE. Each has now customised their desktop on their own after they discovered the control center. As my 5th grader says: "Its tight!"

    2. Re:And with Christmas coming by jmelamed · · Score: 1

      I bought one of these things back in October. October 22nd to be precise. It took them five days to "process my order" and then three weeks to get my machine. Ouch! That was a long time to wait. And they charged me shipping and tax, which is strange for internet purchases of > $100. Heck, Amazon will ship your your crap (slowly) if you buy > $25. The machine was advertised at $199, but after tax and shipping, I was billed $236. That's 18% of the purchase price in "hidden" charges.

      So, the machine worked perfectly right out of the box, if you have a spare monitor lying around (thanks Makunas!). But it doesn't come with a floppy drive or a modem, so installing new software (like a real distro) is a function of finding another machine with a net connection and a CD burner. Not too fun, but certainly doable.

      I'm hoping to use my machine to show my non-techie friends and family (hi Mom!) that they don't have to reboot their machines weekly to get them to run, and they don't have to suffer virii, as long as they get-apt regularly.

  74. In response to naysayers... by Alethes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see a lot of people suggesting that it's likely that most of these cheap computers end up getting wiped clean and having Windows installed. However, I'd like to point out that most computer manufacturers and resellers are locking themselves into really bad situations with Microsoft only because they believe they can't sell these computers without an OS or with an OS other than Windows. Wal-Mart is proving otherwise. So, even if these computers get wiped clean, perhaps other major computer resellers will take note of the fact that they can sell their quality computers without having to lock themselves into the Microsoft trap. If you think about it, this could dramatically alter the way computers are sold in the very near future.

    1. Re:In response to naysayers... by Zordak · · Score: 2
      I see a lot of people suggesting that it's likely that most of these cheap computers end up getting wiped clean and having Windows installed.
      Another thing that comes to mind is that many, many average Joe User types could not manage to install Windows on these things if they wanted to. Windows is not that easy to install, especially with all the activation stuff that they're requiring for XP. I think that the Joe Users who are buying these things are taking them home and using them for e-mail and web surfing without even realizing that they are not using Windows.
      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  75. Re:Do You Know Why They're Selling Well? by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

    Nice troll. But WPA pretty much assures that your normal, garden variety, vegetable-level user isn't going to have that option.

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  76. Customer Type Three by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    When I worked selling computers though, there were two types of customers. There was the type that wanted the best hardware they could get, price be damned, and there was the type that just wanted to type stuff up and surf the net, and those people really only wanted to spend what they had to.

    Of course there is the person who wants to get a 3000 dollar machine for 300 dollars, for someone who will need 3000 dollars worth of tech support hours, and want that tech support for free.

    Those folks I send to a chain store or Gateway or something, where they can scream at a nice warm body in person.

    Someone who has a clue I do not mind sending to a wholesale house.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  77. Novices will eventually want more by evil-empir3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the premise is that the majority of users will want the ability to send and receive email and to be able to surf the net. I belive the more a person does the above activities, the more they will want to try other things such as installing new programs or games. Then they will be rudely awakened to the fact that the programs by and large won't install or even be available. When they realize they aren't getting the same user experience as their friends and neighbors, the public outcry will start.

    1. Re:Novices will eventually want more by Flarelocke · · Score: 1

      By that logic, AOL would be bankrupt by now.

    2. Re:Novices will eventually want more by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I don't know anything about licoris, but Lindows shouldn't be too difficult to install extra software on. I believe its all point and click through their website. By the time enough users get these that might complain all their troubles will be solved by upgrades, patches, new releases and automate install scripts that are easy to use. If a novice can type in lindows.com, click a couple links and download software, then what's going to stop us? What happens when we make it self updating so novices never have to touch their systems again? They will just go to the programs menu to see all the new free applications and games downloaded the night before. Automation is simple when you know what you're doing. And its a good thing most linux developers do.

    3. Re:Novices will eventually want more by tres · · Score: 1

      I've seen my family use computers for years now. They still do the same thing they did when they got the computers. They don't want anything more.

      After YEARS they still only want to be able to check/send e-mail, use AIM, browse the Internet. Hell, they don't even really use the word processing tools.

      They don't want to deal with all the other hassles that usually occur. If they want to play games, they use a game console. Why? because there isn't the inevitable headache that occurs every time they try doing something with their (Windows) computer.

      They don't want upgrades, they don't want frills. They don't care about processor speed, they just want something that's going to work. These aren't dumb people, it's just that things like computers just don't do it for them.

      I think that most people use computers for only what they need, and most people don't need a computer for much. That's who these systems will work for. Of course there's plenty of hot-rods who want to have a fast computer (even though they'll never need it), and they have their own choices.

      --
      Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
    4. Re:Novices will eventually want more by k_187 · · Score: 2

      yes, which is exactly the reason my parents bought a 333 K6-2 about 4 years ago. We had an old Powermac 6100 (actually it was a performa something or other but it was based on the 6100) and it took me forever to explain that the 1001 POS game collections at the Wal-Mart wouldn't work becuase we had a Mac. They finally got tired of asking me "will this work?" and bought the k6-2. its still happily chugging away with Win98 (not SE even) doing Word and Outlook 2k (atually all of office, but word and outlook is all that gets used), IE and AIM. I keep telling her to let me gut and update it, but there really isn't any point in that beside letting me muck about with new hardware. mmmm new hardware.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    5. Re:Novices will eventually want more by Shuh · · Score: 1
      When they realize they aren't getting the same user experience as their friends and neighbors, the public outcry will start.
      Most of the computer Ignorantsia are having lots of compatibility problems with Windows. Thost that chose Lindows will hear about all those same kind of issues from their Windows-using friends and just chalk it up to being "par for the course."
    6. Re:Novices will eventually want more by ndogg · · Score: 2

      Sure, and that's the reason that Apple is failing so miserably these days.

      Don't you understand how supply and demand work? Once companies realize that people want software for these machines, the software will be written. Sure, some people won't want to wait, and will likely go out and get Windows installed, but for those who are satisfied so far, but still want more, they will stick to these until that software that they want is released.

      Consumers aren't always logical. If they were, there would be no need for perfumes, designer clothing, game consoles, etc.

      Once the demand is there, the software will come, and people will stick with it. This is how Apple has survived for so long. Customer loyalty is an extremely valuable asset for businesses, and I think that Lindows, Walmart, Microtel, and all the other players involved in these PCs are going to win that.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    7. Re:Novices will eventually want more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it took me forever to explain that the 1001 POS game collections at the Wal-Mart wouldn't work becuase we had a Mac.

      One of the experiences I won't ever forget is standing in the cash register line at CompUSA in front of a mom and her wailing son. He was pointing at game boxes piled by the register and she was saying 'No, that won't run on a Mac.'

      Macintosh- the computer that makes children cry.

      (posted anonymously, because this site is slowly being taken over by Mac zealots. sheesh, who would have ever imagined.....)

    8. Re:Novices will eventually want more by spitzak · · Score: 2
      Nonsense. They will go find their "computer expert friend" and that person will probably install a pirated Windows on the system, and suddenly their programs will install and work. Then they will continue to be happy with the money they saved buying the system.

      This will not adversely impact Linux at all. "Lindows" will probably be considered "inexpensive" and there will be the knowledge that you need to get your hacker friend to do some weird thing to get the games to work, but a machine with "Lindows" in the name actually means a good price.

  78. Best qutoe of the article? by torqer · · Score: 3, Funny
    "We're looking at a consumer who has less sophisticated needs."

    Tons of different meanings on that one. Decide for yourself which way you want to take it.

  79. Hold on here.... by MacBastard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know a whole lot about what's inside this box hardware-wise, but doesn't it look like a great starting point for building one of those Linux-based PVR's people have been making vague squeaky noises about for months here?

    Just a random thought!

    --
    - Semper Ubi Sub Ubi!
  80. It's The Apps, Stupid by limekiller4 · · Score: 2

    I think they don't mind because their computer is probably working a lot faster than they're used to anyway. The customer ...well, most customers aren't concerned with the label on the front of the box so much as how long they have to snooze before their Excel doc opens.

    I guess I never paid much attention to Lindows but this might be one seriously sneaky way to get Linux in "under the wire." No wonder Redmond is getting hostile to that distro in particular. How dare they do more with less! SUE! SUE!

    "Innovation over litigation," my ass.

    And lest anyone mod me as a troll for the subject, please be aware that "It's the [insert noun], Stupid" is a fairly common in-joke when something is semi-obvious and is not directed at the writer of the story.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  81. it does not matter what they do by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 2

    It does not matter what the customer does with the PC bought without an OS. Or, Lindows.

    The point is that without Microsoft XP bundled in the PC can be a lot cheaper.

    And, companies like Hpaq, IBM, Dell should without a doubt offer bare bones PCs without operating systems on them.

    There is absolutely no reason not to do that. None. Zippo. There is none.

    You can by the MB, chip, disc and keyboard and always have been able to do so. There is no reason why the parts you buy could not have a DELL or Hpaq lable on it.

    Bundling XP is market manipulation by the monopolist. Nothing more. Nothing less. And, it done simply to benefit those idiots.

    --
    NexuSys - Linux support by the best
    1. Re:it does not matter what they do by bockman · · Score: 2
      The point is that without Microsoft XP bundled in the PC can be a lot cheaper.

      Almost $100 cheaper. I read somewehere Wallmart also sells near-identical PC with some Microsoft OS for $299.

      Now, $100 may be nothing when you plan to spend $1000 or more for the new computer. But if you can/want only spent $400 (including a monitor in the price), then it starts to make a difference.

      I also read somewhere (I think the Register) that WallMart asked Microsoft for a discount and they said no. Bad move. If the 'cheap PC' takes the flight (and I think it will), they might want to reconsider. Eaning $50 for each cheap PC is much better than earning $0. Not to speak of the fact that people may start to realize that a PC does not need a Microsoft OS to be useful.

      --
      Ciao

      ----

      FB

    2. Re:it does not matter what they do by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 2

      About $100 is the difference at the low end. But, there is little telling what it is on a $1000 PC.

      What is important is for Hpaq, DELL, Gateway and IBM to correctly price their systems AND also provide them without any OS bundled in.

      Until the consumer can see the difference in cost between a machine with and without the Microsoft brand, consumers will remain duped.

      An OS may be necessary. But, an OS does not need to be purchased as the minimum deal as Microsoft has demanded.

      Maybe when Wal-Mart sales take off for LIndows or bare systems, a few other OEMs will wise up. But, it is the major OEMs that need to correct their inappropriate behaviour (just because it pleases the idiots at Microsoft).

      Even on a $1000 PC, $100 is significant. If not then all PCs would be loaded to the hilt because no single component matters much. But, of course, they are not. None are. Almost all models come with many choices on hardware. Different processors, different discs, different CDRom/DVD players. Different memory.

      And, there is no reason why Hpaq does not offer just as many options on software.

      Hpaq should show a $1000 PC costing about $100-150 less without the Microsoft crap. But, they do not. They will charge extra for XP Pro. But, are illegally restricted from charging less without XP at all. When that changes, the market will change. And, only then can other systems compete fairly with Microsoft.

      Right now competition is precluded. And, OEMs are a major problem.

      --
      NexuSys - Linux support by the best
    3. Re:it does not matter what they do by Unanimous+Howard · · Score: 0

      Wasn't one of the few conditions of the MS anti-trust settlment that MS must sell to all OEMs at the same price?

  82. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by xjerky · · Score: 2

    One could say that Wal-Mart is benefiting the citizens of the third-world countries that they allegedly utilize. If they didn't get the (albeit measley) salary from Wal-Mart, where else would they get it from? If there were better alternatives there, I would imagine that they would be taken as well. And if Wal-Mart were to decide to pay more for labor, then they may as well just use U.S citizens for that, but that would put those third-world citizens completely out of a job (or maybe they'd go work for Nike for something).

    That's not to say that the practice isn't scummy, but it's probably worse to deny them the opportunity of sweat shop labor to begin with.

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
  83. It's a good idea! by c0dedude · · Score: 1

    I like the idea of selling boxes preloaded with linux, but if you're gonna sell them to general public you should include a big book of how to use linux such as this one:Red Hat for Dummies or this one Linux in a nutshell
    ....even if it does raise the price a bit.

    oh, and why, when you search for linux on amazon, do 400 articles of clothing come up?

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    1. Re:It's a good idea! by tftp · · Score: 1
      General public does not read books, especially technical ones. It only can take a big colorful leaflet with easy to read steps (how to plug the cord into the wall outlet, for example).

      The stuff is just supposed to work. If it doesn't, then the "general public" dials 800 number. RTFM is not in this scheme of things.

  84. Re:In Soviet Russia..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, that won't do at all. Remember, it's "In Soviet Russia, [object] [verb]s [subject]!"

    Yours should be something like "In Soviet Russia, overusing death warrants joke!"

  85. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the way that they fuck their retail employees in the ass (e.g. not allowed to unionize, etc.)?

  86. 199.00 vs 199.89 models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It appears there are two models selling at about $199:

    the $199.00 Microtel SYSMAR535 PC With 800 MHz Processor and
    the $199.89 Microtel SYSMAR710 800 MHz PC with LindowsOS

    There is an 89 cent difference between the two. For your 89 cents, you appear to loose an internal 3.5 inch bay but you get:

    LindowsOS operating system (pre-installed)

    Software includes mail, word processor, Web browser/file manager, address book, calculator, CD player, MP3 Player, PowerPoint viewer, Word viewer, Excel viewer and Image viewer Games include Tron, Battleship, Poker, Minesweeper, Potato Guy

    Special Offer - Select up to 10+ software applications at no charge from the Lindows.com Click-N-Run Warehouse "Starter Aisle"If I were to get one of these, I think I would keep my 89 cents, keep the 3.5 inch internal bay, loose the Lindows and use one of the ISO's I've got at home to install my preferred OS. I don't need no stinking Click-N-Run Starter Aisle to get the software I need!

  87. Oh God, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another Gay-for-Pay pornstar. Eewwwwww!

    1. Re:Oh God, by stevejsmith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In Soviet Russia, YOU pay for gay!

  88. Re:Boxes? surely you meant boxen? by Moofie · · Score: 1

    What's the plural of ox?

    That's right. Oxen.

    See? It's a funny word joke. Nobody really thinks that the plural of box is boxen. It's a pun. Makes people chuckle on the inside.

    Lighten up, man! A grammar/spelling flame is one thing, but getting your panties in a twist because of an intentional play on words is really, well, compulsive.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  89. Speaking of AOL by xjerky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ....they should really look at this and attempt to partner up with Wal-Mart and produce a Linux version of AOL. They're desperate for revenue right now, and appealing to the $200 PC market would be a good niche to get in on. They could have sold a $250 version which includes a "free" year of AOL or something. Still not a bad deal to the price-conscious shopper.

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    1. Re:Speaking of AOL by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

      Clearly. What is sweeter than taking Mr. Softie's brilliant targeting
      of the low common denominator and shooting just a little lower?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:Speaking of AOL by e_n_d_o · · Score: 2

      Better yet, do something similar to what MSN did. Give the computer away for free (with a monitor and modem), with a two-year contract with AOL.

      23.90/month for AOL service * 24 months = $573.

    3. Re:Speaking of AOL by Polo · · Score: 2

      I believe THIS is what you would get...

    4. Re:Speaking of AOL by Jack+Hughes · · Score: 2
      Yay!

      Instead of posting a CD through your letter box, they could just post the whole computer!

    5. Re:Speaking of AOL by MasonMcD · · Score: 2

      ...a Linux version of AOL.

      Isn't that like saying we ought to produce a nuclear submarine that you get in a box of cracker jacks?

    6. Re:Speaking of AOL by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Or, as has been suggested by others, AOLinux. Making this a package deal with a basic PC (such as the Walmart models) would be great marketing for everyone involved.

      And why not, since so many AOLers use their PC for email and very little else? So long as they recognise the AOL interface, these people won't know or care what OS is under it, and will be perfectly happy.

      People here bitch about how the masses are stuck on Windows, then they bitch when someome tries to create a linux that can be marketed to the "lowest common denominator"... Make up your minds, people. Do you want linux to become common on realworld desktops or not? If you do, then you MUST find a way to appeal to the masses. AOL's ubiquity in the online marketplace is a perfect place to start.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Speaking of AOL by xjerky · · Score: 2

      Right. And I don't see how making AOLinux can have a negative impact on regular Linux users. Don't like AOL? Dont use it, end of story.

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    8. Re:Speaking of AOL by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Exactly. I don't like [insert disty here], so I'm not obligated to use it. The "negative", of course, is that some linux bigots suffer from a psychosis where they feel that if ordinary people can use it, that somehow demeans linux.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  90. Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by calm_rising · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, I'm a physician, not a techie (I read slashdot because it's so hard to find anything else intelligent to read). So perhaps I can provide the "Joe Schmoe" perspective.

    I wanted to confirm what people are saying about the average Joe Schmoe not needing computer power. I'm still running an AMD K6 200 MHz processor from 1997. I have a DSL connection and Win 98SE (shudder). I surf the web with IE6, run Yahoo! Messenger, and check email with Eudora, typically all at once, often while also playing bridge on M$N Zone (sorry, M$-haters, it's the best free bridge I've found!).

    I couldn't sell this box for anything, let alone $200, yet it does everything I want to do. Sure, it slows down a bit when I use everything at once, but not enough to go out and spend money. If you're a Joe Schmoe like me.

    So you're right. The common man doesn't need a monster CPU, etc. That being said, don't forget that usability is key. Most people will be completely unable to surf the web and send email if they have to do too much more than plug it in, turn it on, and follow some very user-friendly instructions. If the Lindows box can't do this, it's not going to do very well.

    So, can it? I hear people saying that it doesn't even come with a monitor?

    1. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by Nameles · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does not come with a monitor.

      The C3 processor in it is a Cyrix, which is like a Celeron: lower cache, doesn't go as fast as it should. It does run pretty well, but it's not the fastest (I believe Durons go faster, probably Celerons too).

      And Slashdot intelligent? Haw.

      (had to use the joke)

    2. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1
      I wanted to confirm what people are saying about the average Joe Schmoe not needing computer power. I'm still running an AMD K6 200 MHz processor from 1997. I have a DSL connection and Win 98SE (shudder). I surf the web with IE6, run Yahoo! Messenger, and check email with Eudora, typically all at once, often while also playing bridge on M$N Zone (sorry, M$-haters, it's the best free bridge I've found!).
      At my dialysis unit, I use a laptop with the K6-133 in it. I just surf, AIM, and read email on it. Someone gave it to me earlier in the year for free. It does exactly what I need it to do.

      I hear people saying that it doesn't even come with a monitor?
      Most 'cheap' PCs don't. That has to be bought seperate. The monitor is going to double your cost tho.

    3. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      (I read slashdot because it's so hard to find anything else intelligent to read)

      It's worse out there on the Internet than we thought.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    4. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by reflector · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Most 'cheap' PCs don't. That has to be bought seperate. The monitor is going to double your cost tho.


      not. you can find pleny of decent used 17" monitors (and that's probably overkill for an email/websurfing system) for $20-$80. I even came across someone selling 21" sun monitors for $50 each last week.

    5. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1

      I am talking about new. I am sure that if you wanted to root around in enough dumpsters, you could find a free one, but Joe Sixpack isn't going to do that.

    6. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      A local computer shop, EBC Computers sells 19" elements monitors for about $150, and another local shop, Armadillo Bros, sells good condition used monitors for next to nothing. One of the local office chains was running a $100 sale on a 19" monitor, but I can't remember which one. You can find 15" and 17" monitors anywhere these days, too.

    7. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      LindowsOS is pretty easy.. For those without an ISP it comes with a sign-up tool for Earthlink dial-up and Speakeasy DSL, instructions on configuring KPPP, a PPPoE configuration wizard, etc.

      I personally like the interface much better than Mandrake's configuration stuff, which is a pain to find, and is not consistent with the rest of the system. IMO Mandrake should stop designing their blurry interfaces that look different (especially the installer...) and try to make them more consistent with the other apps on the system (or make those apps consistent with their stuff).

    8. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

      Actually the C3 is a newer version of what used to be the Centaur Winchip. VIA shut the Cyrix team(s) down.
      The chip runs integer code pretty well, but falls behind in FPU. The next version should help with the latter.
      BTW, the processors are soldered onto these motherboards, they're supposedly somewhat like the VIA EPIA boards, but I haven't seen one yet.

    9. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by FyRE666 · · Score: 2

      I wanted to confirm what people are saying about the average Joe Schmoe not needing computer power. I'm still running an AMD K6 200 MHz processor from 1997.

      Very true, my mother somehow got hold of an old PC for free a short while back (the local college is upgrading) - it was a P133 with 16MB RAM and a tiny 500MB HD ;-) It was running Win95, but obviously struggling with the lack of RAM - so I found some old sticks to bring it up to 32MB (I couldn't find any more that would fit) and it more than doubled the speed! It's used for Web+Email and her current fad: geneology; and works fine for this. The Windows installation took up less than 100MB, which surprised me, BTW...

    10. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by Arandir · · Score: 5, Funny

      I read slashdot because it's so hard to find anything else intelligent to read

      Keep searching...

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    11. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by flacco · · Score: 2
      OK, I'm a physician, not a techie (I read slashdot because it's so hard to find anything else intelligent to read).

      You must be the guy who sawed off grampa's wrong leg.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    12. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by Nameles · · Score: 1

      Not all C3 chips are soldered on to the boards. The cheap model computer we sell where I work has a P3 board with a C3 in the socket already, but it's easily removed. Might be different with the newer chips though.

    13. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by oh · · Score: 2

      Try looking here

      --
      Democracy isn't about no one telling you what to do. It's about everyone telling you what to do.
    14. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      Kuro5hin definitely has discussion that's more intelligent than Slashdot, if you take each as a whole. However, it's also full of extremist libertarians, which means that you get a full dose of political dogma when you go there, instead of just straightforward technical discussion.

      I think the readership age of Kuro5hin is probably about ten years higher, on average, than Slashdot, and the issues and opinions tend to reflect that.

      Finally, after a hard day of dealing with someone's frusterating technical problems caused by a poorly written piece of MS software, a lot of IT people like to kick back with a hot drink and enjoy a little Linux feelgoodism.

    15. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by Arandir · · Score: 2

      However, it's also full of extremist libertarians, which means that you get a full dose of political dogma when you go there

      It's also balanced by extremist socialists in various guises, so you get the radical political dogma of your choosing.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    16. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by nordicfrost · · Score: 2

      Actually, we are two. I write this on a PII/266 512MB RAM. And I'm a geek. I just didn't care to join the rat race of having the latest and greatest. I also write tech news for a large website, but do I need a SpeedFreek-machine to do this? Nope. For gaming, there's PS2. It all boils down to what you can get by with. I surf, write and manage some 40 000+ emails on this machine and it does that perfectly.

      The WalMart machine does the same thing as mine, only quicker. How can it not be perfect for a Joe Schmoe?

    17. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a doctor! Not a physician!

      four on the floor!

    18. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by Reziac · · Score: 2

      But not coming with a monitor is actually an advantage:

      Monitors are HEAVY. They cost a fortune to ship and are prone to arrive broken. You can buy a monitor (for considerably less than the combined cost of purchase plus shipping/insurance) at your local Walmart, Costco, Office Depot, or sometimes even the Salvation Army. And that way you have a choice of size and quality, rather than taking whatever comes with the new PC (which may not be as good as your old one). Local Walmarts actually offer some pretty decent monitors, at good prices.

      Or just use your old monitor. There is nothing proprietary about ordinary monitors. Nearly any random PC monitor (which if it's less than 10-12 years old, means standard SVGA) will work fine with any random PC.

      Monitors don't normally require any configuration -- just plug it in and turn it on. Most work fine with their default settings (for screen positioning etc.)

      You'd think it would be obvious, but most everyday users DON'T realise that their PC isn't married to its monitor, keyboard, mouse, printer, scanner,...

      As to the rest of your comment.. exactly. Most people use their machine much as you use yours. I tend to discourage my clients from upgrading until what they have dies, because frankly they aren't exercising the old machine enough to notice. And just because I wouldn't buy a Walmart PC for my own needs doesn't mean it won't meet or exceed someone else's requirements.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    19. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by Reziac · · Score: 2

      You must be very young ;) Why, I remember when we were appalled that Win3.1 required a whole 8mb of disk space!

      Seriously, older machines and older OSs are a good match. They can still do the job for most people.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    20. Re:Confirmation from a "non-geek" (Re:Bingo!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I read slashdot because it's so hard to find anything else intelligent to read

      Try Kuro5hin.org.

  91. reminds me of this quote: by RelliK · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pricetag outside matters more than Intel inside.

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  92. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know who is stupider: The dyslexic fuck that posted the parent comment with a correction that isn't even true, or the naive n00b fuck who modded the post insightful.

  93. Very nice system by vingilot · · Score: 1

    I bought one and put rh8 on it, added 512mb, and turned it into an apache/tomcat webserver. It runs quite well.

    Jonathan

  94. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by GarryOwen · · Score: 1

    Its called capitalism, I sell a service that is worth more than assembling a computer in a factory. My service is worth more because I "invested" my time early on in training and I am now getting a return on my investment.

    FYI - these are assembled in the USA, so the assemblers are at the very least getting minimum wage + all the .gov benefits(earned income credit, etc.)

  95. Suck a cheetah's dick! by Wesley+Willis · · Score: 0, Troll

    Suck a polar bear's funky ass!

    --


    ---
    Rock over London
    Rock on Chicago
    Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions
    1. Re:Suck a cheetah's dick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if the cheetah was fucking the polar bears ass? thats not some sort of situation i wish to place myself in.

    2. Re:Suck a cheetah's dick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's okay! The ass is funky!

    3. Re:Suck a cheetah's dick! by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's funny because you mixed random words together in a comical and haphazard way. It's actually whimsical in this sometimes over serious world. In fact, it's poetic. You probably suffer a lot on the inside, is that what allows you to write such beautiful poetry?

    4. Re:Suck a cheetah's dick! by Wesley+Willis · · Score: 0

      Actually it's lines directly taken from the song "Suck a Cheetah's Dick", by Wesley Willis, who happens to be a paranoid schizophrenic.

      So it's pretty safe to say he does indeed suffer inside quite a bit.

      --


      ---
      Rock over London
      Rock on Chicago
      Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions
    5. Re:Suck a cheetah's dick! by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1

      who happens to be a paranoid schizophrenic

      Pfft. What days we live in. Back in my day, we called them "filthy retards" if they was lucky, now you got your scientific names for them and all.

      "Waah, it's not my fault, I'm a paranoid schizophrenic!". Crybaby fakers. They belong in the straight jackets and dank windowless holes we used to throw them in, not these "treatment centers".

    6. Re:Suck a cheetah's dick! by Wesley+Willis · · Score: 0

      Well, duh, he's not being a crybaby... he's successful and probably doing better than you are. You have to call him a retard because you would otherwise be forced to feel inferior. He uses his schizophrenia to write hilarious crap that people like, and what have you got?

      --


      ---
      Rock over London
      Rock on Chicago
      Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions
  96. The box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it so big?

    A smaller box could be cheaper because distribution and store shelf space would cost less.

  97. All off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what does any of this have to do with a $199 PC from Walmart?

    1. Re:All off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what does any of this have to do with a $199 PC from Walmart?

      Well, if you'd read the thread, you'd note that the original poster commented that the price would likely be far higher.

      And also note that sub-threads are only off-topic in relation to the parent post. That's why slashdot has threaded views... (I hope that helps the incompetent moderators out there)

    2. Re:All off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why slashdot has threaded views

      Actually no, that's not what threaded views are for. Not so you can go off and invent your own topic. It's so people can follow the threads related to the bits of information that they are interested in which are in turn related to the topic of the discussion. In this case, the $199 Walmart PC. One thread might go off talking about how taking the "Intel inside" out of the PC makes it cheaper. That's related to the discussion. Another thread might go off talking about how taking Microsoft out of the PC makes it cheaper. That's also related to the discussion and that's what threaded views are for. But when someone goes off talking about how a car in the US is cheaper than a car in the UK, it's just offtopic plain and simple.

      (I hope that helps the incompetent moderators out there)

    3. Re:All off topic by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 2

      That would apply to the parent post. But how can you possibly justify modding a replt to an off-topic post as off-topic. Especially if it's on topic of the parent.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    4. Re:All off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi folks ,
      Dear Will ! To make it short :that's simply not the point . Maintaining that WM won't promote the new developer team is foolish! firstly , Jackson had already been involved in several projects , containing the qx engine , which turned out to be the best selling mods for a couple of months . therefore , and in terms of his high reputation my firm believe is that ion-storm will be a direct hit on US and especially UK markets . The German promotor has already given signals that a raid on "certain" pros will create rivalries between plg AND uk2 , mainly consisting of oldschool betas , highly regarded in the fan-community . This is not all news but my intention is to make sure that you don't forget whose effort it was that i-s has -for many pgs'- become the prefered choice in this business . Think about it !
      Yours Sincerely
      Alexander Werner | founder of hC-network

    5. Re:All off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi again
      I've alreay got newest info , regarding the project - in a formal interview with [gu], Jackson declared that he's be highly in terested in co-operation with uk2 . For some betas these news aren't unexpected , due to his former statements during -trem3- it could actually be concluded ! To be honest , i was quite upset with this development , although my last remarks on this topic were really clear.
      This is , i suppose the last status of our endeavour :]
      Alex

  98. Economic Laws of Suitable Substitutions by _Sambo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, so maybe it's not a law, but here's my take on the situation.

    Windows costs a lot. See my soon to be written essay on monopolies and excessive profits.

    Intel chips cost a lot. Read my thoughts on comparative advantage.

    Consumers will pay excessive prices for OS software until a suitable substitution is found.

    Enter Lindows and Lycoris for OS, and VIA for the processor. Consumers are the judge and jury as to whether or not these "substitutions" are adequate. Preliminary sales data says: maybe.

    The non-windows companies even admit to attempting to create a viable substitute:

    "Spisak says his Desktop/LX software is modeled to look like Windows XP. "We've basically taken this as far as you can go without being prosecuted," he said.

    I'm interested to see if this is a flash in the pan before the monopolistic powers that be quash the effort with lawsuits, or if it's the first step toward a more appropriately priced Micro$oft OS.

    Time will tell...

  99. In other news, Piracy of Windows hits new High by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    well duh, that's why people who buy these are buying them in the first place (I know, I've spoke to people with them). "I buy this, it's cheaper than a dell [though not by much], and I can get ecchs-pees off of my {bud, son/daughter, cow-orker}".

    Of course, the other thing is that real sales of XP are probably up as people get pissed off with how "useless" Lindows (which they'll perceive as Linux overall) and have to buy XP at retail, for which MS gets more money than the OEM license.

  100. Microsoft as a telco... by Traicovn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Gary Elsasser, vice president of technology at eMachines, said that consumers wanted to be able to run any software and find computer help easily. Linux makes that hard to do.
    Typical. People saying that the software that is available on windows is not available on linux. Yes, this is true that a lot of the same software is not available on linux, and sometimes it is not easy to migrate new users... but people will do it... I run a dual boot system on my laptop 'just in case' I have to use windows, but honestly I can't remember the last time I actually NEEDED to use windows. I honestly will be interested in seeing how many businesses migrate to linux for some of their applications once OpenOffice and similar free/open source office projects become available. I believe that we will see (and have already started to see) Microsofts battle against open-source, and it reminds me of the way that MaBell used to battle local telcos, undercut the competition by lowering your price. In this case, they have to undercut it to the point that they are giving it away for free. There have been several slashdot articles on this reccently, and coming from an educational institution, and talking to IT people at other educational institutions I know that Microsoft offers lots of 'perks' to institutions, including free/cheap software and the Microsoft Academic Alliance (for students) to not only get them to use MS products instead of looking for or adopting alternatives, but also to get students used to and familiar with Microsoft Products instead of products from the competition (CS students req'd to make sure code works in Vis Studio before turning it in, intro to computers or other general courses focusing mainly (if only) on MSOffice). I was going somewhere with this, but I lost track. I guess I'll just end in saying the battle with Microsoft has only begun, you might even argue that the first shots have yet to be fired...

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
  101. No modems?!! by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 1

    So if they don't come with modems how is the novice, non-geek user supposed to get on the internet with them? Seems rather odd. Somehow I doubt it's novices buying these things.

    It would only cost another $40 or so (given the quantities they're working with) to add a modem.

    1. Re:No modems?!! by bmetzler · · Score: 2
      It would only cost another $40 or so (given the quantities they're working with) to add a modem.

      Okay, so $50, but close enough, eh?

      Model with modem

      -Brent
    2. Re:No modems?!! by Traicovn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's the same mentality though as the Ford Pinto (remember, the car that would explode?) It would have cost Ford roughly an 11.00 part to repair the problem with the ford pinto, but that would have put it over their magical 'final cost price' of 2000.00
      They are marketing these PC's at a certain price level... that's their magic number... They don't want to go over it.
      They probably don't have a modem, because the ethernet controller was probably already on the motherboard. Now, what they COULD do, form an alliance with some modem manufacturer and offer some sort of rebate on an external modem...

      --

      [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
      {Traicovn}
  102. Which windows to put on it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm looking into buying one of these boxes as my second box. Thanks to my friends I also got all versions of all OS. Which system would you recommend and know that is working ?

  103. Points to consider by RatBastard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    A few points you need to consider:
    • WalMart does not sell PCs for a liiving. It's jusy one of many products.
    • If this product tanks WalMart will not be hurt at all.
    • WalMart does not need Uncle Bill's blessing to make money (see first point).
    • These are bare-bones, bottom of the pile PCs that are selling because they are cheap.
    This is not a revolution in PC sales. This is a huge desicount chain selling a second-rate computer at the lowest price they possibly can as a side project that isn't even worth putting in their stores.
    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Points to consider by Alethes · · Score: 2

      WalMart does not sell PCs for a liiving. It's jusy one of many products.

      If this product tanks WalMart will not be hurt at all.

      WalMart does not need Uncle Bill's blessing to make money (see first point).


      These are all actually good reasons for Wal-Mart to be the guinea pig to try this sort of "revolution in PC sales" -- which, indeed it is.

      These are bare-bones, bottom of the pile PCs that are selling because they are cheap.

      If somebody that is not even in the PC business can sell junk hardware with no OS or with a non-Microsoft OS, how much better do you think the big dogs will do when they rid themselves of the licensing chokehold that Microsoft puts on them? The only reason that chokehold exists is because the prevailing logic was that nobody would buy a PC without Windows. Wal-Mart proved them wrong.

    2. Re:Points to consider by enjo13 · · Score: 2

      Especially considering the fact that Walmart is VERY VERY seriously considering getting into the PC market in earnest. Not with these machines, but with actual WalMart branded PC's... this certainly seems like a project to 'feel out' the market from my perspective.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    3. Re:Points to consider by misfit13b · · Score: 1
      A few points you need to consider:

      WalMart does not sell PCs for a living. It's jusy one of many products.
      If this product tanks WalMart will not be hurt at all.
      These are bare-bones, bottom of the pile PCs that are selling because they are cheap.

      This sounds like a familiar campaign...
      s/PCs/Xbox s/WalMart/Microsoft

      What's good for the goose is good for the gander!

  104. shockwave and quicktime don't run on linux!? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    well, that's not *quite* true, since shockwave DOES run on linux (and it runs well, although they're only up to version 5) and if you use the crossover plugin, quicktime 6 runs just fine too.

    1. Re:shockwave and quicktime don't run on linux!? by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

      Actually, Quicktime movies can be played native by the new version of MPlayer...I figure it will be included in the next distros or so (with perhaps a dowload for the codecs - I'm not sure on the legal details about their distribution). Xine can already play Quicktime movies, just not those who use the Sorenson codec.

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
  105. Re:I guess cnn bias is winning liberal minded by RatBastard · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You are the sorriest excuse for a trol I've ever seen. Too damned lazy to bother with propper letter casing, punctuation, grammar or even coherant thought.

    next time, put a little effort into it. Okay?

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  106. People expect linux to be hard to use by joeler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many people have an idea that linux is some mysterous type of operating system that only computer geeks can use. Last week a coworker that was interested asked me a lot about it. My advice was to stick the installation cd in and boot the computer to see what happens, he did: the SuSE 8.0 installation went flawlessly and soon he had a dual boot system with windows and linux. He said his son was shocked to see how nice the KDE3 desktop was and both were pleasantly surprised how easy it was to install a linux distribution on a computer already loaded with windows. The more peopel realize you don't have to be a computer geek to run linux, the more they will find it a worthwhile investment. It's ironic, windows users spend months learning how to use windows and complain they are afraid to try linux because it will take too long to learn - well, some are realizing it is NOT that difficult. WalMart selling pre-loaded systems ready to go for less than $200 that work well is a very prudent thing to do these days when one does not know how long they will have a job.

    --
    >>>please remove "nospam" from email address
  107. Anybody own one? by mehip2001 · · Score: 1

    I am curious. I don't know anybody who owns one of these boxes. I'd love to here just an impression (sucks!/love it) as sometimes the reviews are wishy-washy or just plain to damn boring to read.

    --
    Just for the record, there is NO "off the record" record.
    Make a record of that.
  108. You'll save X-mas! by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

    There is no modem, floppy disk drive, or monitor

    as soon as grandma realizes she can't use AOL or do any other internet related stuff on it, you'll be sitting there installing a modem, downloading drivers and WINE. :p

  109. Two Reviews on July 4 by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Slashdot covered two reviews of those machines July 4."

    Makes a change from "Slashdot posted the same review of these machines twice on July 4."

  110. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2

    You have obviously never seen a Michael Moore movie.

  111. How about schools and kindergardens? by axxackall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder noone mentioned the poor public education. $200 per box? It's a perfect price for schools! I am going to talk to the principal - my kid complains they don't have enough computer classes b/c there is not enough of computers. ... Jeez, is it 21st century or it's a middle age?

    --

    Less is more !
  112. And that relates EXACTLY to what cnn was saying! by cybercomm · · Score: 2

    "It is going to be harder to get people to adopt that sort of stuff" since most consumers want Windows, concluded Roger Kay, a PC analyst at International Data Corp. research group.

    So cnn's research was right on the mark! Joe blow buys it only because of the price, and if he has any brains at all he does what you do: put in a pirated Windows on it! Now i have one question: Does ANYONE have any benchmarks for those Cyrix C3 CPU's VS P4s (all running Windows).

    Oh and wasn't there an article that said that the same configuration was sold with Windows home ed. preloaded? I wonder how that one is doing...

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
  113. Joe Sixpack didn't buy it.. by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Funny

    5,000,000 Slashdot geeks went out and bought them and immediately installed $LINUX_DISTRO on them when they got home.

    Some even bought 2 or 3 and gave 'em to the kids.
    Others turned extra boxes into home mp3 servers.

  114. Re:Boxes? surely you meant boxen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look on m-w.com you can see that ox is also accepted as a plural of ox (much like deer and fish) which is what I always use. Oxen is more of a relic of Old English.

  115. You take one... by ClickWir · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I don't think a "reality pill" needs to be taken here. I do tech support for a regional ISP and we've had a couple dozen people call in with Lindows. They seem to mostly be fairly new to computers, have a modem, actually do have Lindows on there and now Windows and seem to be fine with the fact that they have no idea what Linux is and how it compares to Windows.

    "Ignorage is bliss" is a very fitting statement to this situation. Most people that I've talked to aren't looking to compare KDE to Windows Explorer like most geeks do. First thing I think of when I look at Lindows is "how does it compare to my win2k and xp machines". "Can I do this in Lindows, does Lindows let me do this" I start testing it. Pushing it's limits. Yea, I find quite a few... my grandmother won't find them nor care if I do. She'll use it to get online and check some webpages and do some email... play some simple games... and have a good time. Suprize, that's EXCATLY what these pc's and Lindows are made to do and are marketed to do.

  116. $298.86 gets you by BigBir3d · · Score: 2

    this

    # VIA C3 800 MHz processor offers comparable performance to the 800 MHz Celeron processor
    # 133 MHz frontside bus
    # 256 MB SDRAM, expandable to 1 GB
    # 133 MHz memory speed
    # 40 GB Ultra-ATA 100 hard drive, 5400 rpm (total accessible capacity varies depending on operating environment)
    # 52x CD-ROM drive
    # 3.5-inch floppy disk drive
    # Integrated AGP 4x graphics
    # Up to 8 MB shared video memory
    # Integrated AC '97 sound
    # 56 Kbps modem
    # Integrated 10/100 Ethernet connection
    # Micro ATX tower case (14"D x 7"W x 14"H)
    # Available drive bays: one 5.25-inch external, one 3.5-inch external
    # Total Slots: 1 PCI
    # Available PCI Slots: None
    # High-speed serial port
    # Parallel port
    # 2 front and 2 rear USB ports
    # Game port
    # 104-key keyboard
    # 2-button mouse with wheel
    # Audio port (line-in, line-out, mic-in)
    # Stereo speakers
    # LindowsOS operating system (pre-installed)
    # Software includes mail, word processor, Web browser/file manager, address book, calculator, CD player, MP3 Player, PowerPoint viewer, Word viewer, Excel viewer and image viewer
    # Games include Tron, Battleship, Poker, Minesweeper, Potato Guy
    # Special Offer - Select up to 10+ software applications at no charge from theLindows.com Click-N-Run Warehouse "Starter Aisle"
    # 1-year warranty, return to Microtel

    1. Re:$298.86 gets you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, a mouse with 2 buttons. I wonder how macintosh users will defend their purchase of their machines when stacked up to all of this for 300 dollars. They can pay all they want but they will never have "Potato Guy".

    2. Re:$298.86 gets you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the famous words of the Potato Guy: "eyebrow"

  117. Not true... would be fun if it was. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2

    Actually major manufactorers generally shine in puny junk pc's. For example, I couldn't build a machine but a tiny bit better than these junkheaps for $200... but I could build a dual althon MP for under $1500, with 1 or 2 gb ram, and 2 120hds... a cdrw, and high-end radeon. Maybe even make that a dvd-rw

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  118. Re:Boxes? surely you meant boxen? by zapfie · · Score: 1

    ...you do realize the whole 'boxen' thing is a running joke, right?

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  119. The Wal-Mart Population by dolby2 · · Score: 1

    I've seen some of the people that shop there, better yet the people that would buy computers there. These people aren't the finest genetic specimens on this planet, and I am simply amazed this PC is actually selling well. But none the less that is great, anything to make the market less of a monopoly is a plus.

  120. The VIA processor is really bad. by cartman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The VIA CPU is a reincarnation of the old IDT/centaur winchip. Via purchased both centaur and cyrix after they both flopped at making x86 CPUs.

    The Via c3 has only one integer unit and one fp unit, coupled with a decent-sized cache. Architecturally, the via c3 is extremely primitive, worse than the original pentium. The c3 benchmark scores are consistently about 1/3rd to 1/4th those of a celeron or a duron at the same clock speed.

    That tragic this is: putting an AMD duron in this machine would have tripled the performance, and would have costed only about $10 more. The $199 lindows box was likely intended to be a no-profit "crippleware" machine, to lure people to the $299 and $399 models.

    1. Re:The VIA processor is really bad. by BadlandZ · · Score: 2
      You have a point only IF you san point out where one can buy a complete AMD system new for $210.

      Until someone makes it, and sells it for that price, the $199 is a hit for a functional PC for under $200 (functional != fast)...

      I'm just thinking Xterminal anyway... And this thing is cheaper than Diskless Workstations that the LTSP guys use.

    2. Re:The VIA processor is really bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote:

      You have a point only IF you san point out where one can buy a complete AMD system new for $210. :Endquote

      Well, just take one of these 199 $ Lindows boxes and replace the VIA by an AMD :)

    3. Re:The VIA processor is really bad. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Wish that could be done, too bad it's not possible.

      Dunno about stock market, but it seems that Duron at same clock speed is actually even a bit cheaper, or as expensive as than the VIA C3.

      It's just that C3 is socket-370 CPU, you don't plug Duron into same motherboard as one of these. And probably no Socket-A mb's that would be as cheap as whatever walmart is using. And you'd need better cooling for hot-as-hell AMD, so no way that is going for under $200 mark, for $250, maybe, but that fifty dollar difference is too much for the one looking for cheapest possible.

  121. GO ON FINE??? GO ON FINE? you idiot! by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2

    If microsoft dropped out of the scene, the desktop industry would be so much better, it wouldn't be funny. Mozilla would suddenly become #1 in browser usage... already #1 in quality. All the total idiots who couldn't even get mandrake running would stop buying junk from spammers... that would be a huge plus. And of course, we'd finally have a secure, stable, and open envirenment.
    Unfortunatly, it would have the backfire effect of killing Appple, but who cares about Apple? :-)

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:GO ON FINE??? GO ON FINE? you idiot! by jaeson · · Score: 1

      No one cares about apple? Apple users are the most loyal customers around. And isn't OSX based on a BSD UNIX implementation? I doubt very seriously that this would kill Apple.

      Also, I have never seen a default installation of Linux that is secure out-of-the-box. Regular users out there will be just as insecure as they are now unless someone skilled in security locks the box down for them, and continues to apply security patches and bug fixes.

      I don't like Microsoft any more than the next Slashdotter, but your claims are a bit exaggerated.

    2. Re:GO ON FINE??? GO ON FINE? you idiot! by JPriest · · Score: 2

      "the total idiots who couldn't even get mandrake running"

      Mandrake is never really "running", more of a crawl I'd say. I'm a dual-booter and have been for a while. Say what you will of MS sucking but you can pry my pirated copy of win XP pro from my cold dead fingers.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:GO ON FINE??? GO ON FINE? you idiot! by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 2
      I figure that Apple would get at least half of the pie. If MS dropped off the ends of the earth, Apple would immediately release their Intel version of OS-X. That right there would give them a good chunk of the Microsoft Orphanage. At that point you'd have a knock-down drag-out fight between Linux and Mac. A fight that would (I'd expect) be to the benefit of the consumers.

      Now that I think of it, getting rid of MS might do absolute wonders to the level of innovation and quality in the software market.

      P.S. A lot of people know, trust and lust after the Apple name in the computer market. About the only think keeping a lot of people from moving back to Mac is the stranglehold that MS seems to have on the market. Removing the betrothed supplier (MS) from the equation would leave a lot of people free to move to their 'real love'.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    4. Re:GO ON FINE??? GO ON FINE? you idiot! by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2

      Apple would need time to really make OS-X a viable platform for Intel. Even though they could release a development release right away, they wouldn't have accelerated 3d drivers, or a lot of other really important stuff right away, and apple has never been big on games. Yeah, they'd eventually release it, but even if it was in time, it wouldn't be much of a fight between mac and linux.

      And what? a bunch of the people who are always saying "If linux would just support XXX..." wouldn't switch when it did? Sure, they could peacefully co-exist for a while, but most apple users would switch to linux 100% if the app/driver support was as good as Windows.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
  122. Sub $500 PC by jbolden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One thing that doesn't seem to be mentioned here is the importance of a sub $500 PC on who buys computers. Back around the time of the Commodore Vic 20 and 64 you had a huge number of parents buying dedicated computers for young children; and poor people buying computers for themselves. Since the death of the Amiga 500 we really haven't had new computers that are cheap enough for people to casually buy them. The effects of adding say 10 or 20 million home computers to the market in terms of the spread of knowledge, broadband, games... could be quite profound.

  123. Re:Boxes? surely you meant boxen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Oxen is more of a relic of Old English.

    And so are UNICES. Haha, I just got you even more mad!

  124. AAUGHH!! by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Funny
    Okay, I nearly had a heart attack when I read this:
    Freedom -- from Microsoft --
    A split second passed where I thought that, somehow, Microsoft had either trademarked "Freedom", released a program named "Freedom" ("Microsoft Freedom"... perhaps an oxymoron like "Microsoft Works"?), or acquired the intellectual property rights to the entire concept of freedom. Man, I need to read less /.
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  125. Lycoris, too. by Tar-Palantir · · Score: 1

    The article notes that not only Lindows, but also Lycoris, are supplying the OS's for these machines.

    1. Re:Lycoris, too. by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

      The Lycoris version is a lot better, as Lycoris comes with things you have to pay the Lindows people for. And it dosen't make you run as root :)

  126. Live by the $ die by the $ by crovira · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the "consumer space" CPU brand, MIPS, Mega-flops, megs of RAM and gigs of disk space don't matter worth crap.

    What counts is all on the bottom line.

    M$ is kidding itself if it thinks people give a tinker's cuss about it's software. Most people never "got it" and haven't ever had a friggin' clue as to what all the screaming was about.

    M$ Office in on the way out in the consumer space because OpenOffice is available for about half a friggin' grand less. M$ Windows is on the way out in the consumer space because Linux is available for a few hundred less.

    What sells in the consumer space is whatever's "good enough" and "fast enough" (something M$ is definitely LOUSY at,) to do what people want.

    The hardware is already there, has been for a couple of years. The software/bloatware is what's been holding up the works.

    On the business front, as a software developer, I'd rip my own lungs out before buying Lindows for what my professional needs are, but the user work-stations (read that again "work" "station") and the MIS departments that have to keep the boxen alive are glad to have a cheap M$ alternative.

    Rolling out Lindows boxen sounds like some MIS manager's big "I saved X-amount of dollars" bonus opportunity.

    And at home Lindows'd be good enough... If I wasn't typing this on a slackware8.1 box and if I wasn't already a Mac maniac for my other machines. :-)

    My biggest challenge is teaching my techno-indifferent wife to use the Linux box. (She doesn't want to use the Mac either.)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Live by the $ die by the $ by CustomDesigned · · Score: 2
      My biggest challenge is teaching my techno-indifferent wife to use the Linux box.

      This comment is also addressed to the disparaging comments about the intelligence of Wal-Mart shoppers. My wife shops at Wal-Mart. Our marriage was revolutionized when she read The Joy of Linux .

      The tech stuff still doesn't mean anything to her, but now she is acutely aware of the political and social issues, and calls herself a "Linux Chick". She can't tell you what a "bit" is, but she can explain why software freedom is so much more important than free software and the difference between GPL and BSD licenses. She now regards acquaintances that work for Micro$oft as "black sheep", where before she didn't see what all the fuss what about. She still gets confused trying to use the computer, but now she sees that Linux is no more confusing than Windows - plus, we have been able to customize her applications from the many choices available to select those she finds most intuitive. Her web browser is Mozilla. (Go figure.) Her word processor is Open Office. (Does fancy fonts out of the box.)

      Now we have many stimulating discussions concerning intellectual property and which open source business models work the best. Take note geeks, it is possible to be really smart and not understand what a bit is.

    2. Re:Live by the $ die by the $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >She now regards acquaintances that work for
      >Micro$oft as "black sheep"

      Uh, she has acquaintances that work for MS?
      This puts her in a category that already qualifies as some sort of proto-geek.

      I mean, she knows people that don't work in, say, fashion or hospitality? Like, she's in business, a business that touches tech?

      She's not in the class of 'techo-indifferent' that the other poster was talking about at all.

      My S.O. is a med student. She blows me away in Calculus, Physics, and Chemistry (and I'm not bad -- I'm a math/physics major), so she's automatically into nerd status. So the fact that she runs openoffice really isn't worthy of note.

      Thinking I might add the Joy of Linux book to her xmas gift though -- thanks for the tip on that.

  127. Re: Who on /. uses this hunk of junk? Me! by mehip2001 · · Score: 1

    So does lindows suck? I'm curious seems like everone just puts a new os on the boxes.

    --
    Just for the record, there is NO "off the record" record.
    Make a record of that.
  128. LindowsOS PC at TigerDirect topped the charts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and then they ran out of them. Yes, many of those purchases will go to people who pirate WindowsXX and give the box to their (grand)mothers, but some of them are indeed keeping LindowsOS or other Linux distros.

  129. WalMart censorship by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Yep, that annoys me no end, and I live in NYC so don't even have to shop there. My question is: do they label the media as having been modified? Perhaps a special B rating for boring.
    It has been my experience in the past that, in fact, there is no such labeling.
    Of course, one funny (laughing to keep from crying) aspect of this is that the RIAA/MPAA's members are seeing their products sold in stripped down form because they don't have the unity to stand up to WalMart/DuaneReade/CVS/etc. Good to know that they're there for their members when quality and brand identity are on the line. Hmph.
    btw, one interesting factoid: Southland Corporation (Seven-Eleven) has repeatedly stood up to pressure to moron-proof their stuff. One too many suits from the Wildmon crowd and 7/11 decided that backing free speech was a business matter for them. Cool. Makes me feel better about all those Slurpies I've paid for.
    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  130. Better hardware - same price? by wytcld · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This may be off topic, then again ...

    For those of use who might throw $200 at a utility box, can anyone recommend hardware (especially motherboard and power supply) that are of better proven quality than this WalMart dohingus, yet still come in with the same (incomplete) features for not more than $200? $250? Sure, we'd as soon screw the stuff together and install our fave distro ... which ought to be worth the $20 of Asian labor they're probably using on this. But then again it's $20 of American stocking/shipping labor for an outfit to send out separate parts ... so can we build this better ourselves @ this price point?

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    1. Re:Better hardware - same price? by torgosan · · Score: 2

      "...the $20 of Asian labor...."

      Actually, American labor.

      From the website:

      Microtel SYSMAR710 800 MHz PC with LindowsOS

      Specifications
      Shipping weight in pounds: 35.0
      Product Measurement in inches: 14.0 x 14.0 x 7.0
      Some Assembly Required: Volts: 110 or 220V
      Assembled Country of Origin: USA
      Components Country of Origin: USA and/or Imported

      --
      "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand". -Milton F.
  131. You may sound like a princess for saying that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people who STEAL make everything expensive, everybody poor, everyone pissed, and only your selfish self selfishly satiated. you fucking ass-pirate.

  132. Accidental Purchases by SmartGamer · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd wonder what percentage of (l)users buy one of these, boot them up, and then say... "Hey, what's wrong with this thing?" when it doesn't greet them with any variant of "Windows is now booting."

    --
    Warning: Poster of this comment is a nerd. Just like everybody else here.
    1. Re:Accidental Purchases by AbRASiON · · Score: 0

      Why is that marked a troll, there's some damn hardcore zealots here!

      That's a COMPLETELY legitimate question, your AVERAGE dummy knows about Windows - I wouldn't be surprised if that exact scenario of users wondering "where's windows" frequently occurs with these things.

    2. Re:Accidental Purchases by SmartGamer · · Score: 1

      Calm down. I should have left the (l) completely off; I'd probably have been fine then.

      That "Where's Windows?" comment was heard from one of my less technologically-inclined friends when I booted my Red Hat partition.

      I'm thinking that M$ may have had a point when they tried to kill Lindows by saying it's designed to confuse people.

      Stupid as it seemed at the time, it just might have been right.

      --
      Warning: Poster of this comment is a nerd. Just like everybody else here.
  133. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by tempest303 · · Score: 2

    If they didn't get the (albeit measley) salary from Wal-Mart, where else would they get it from?

    Exactly! I mean, what WOULD those insolent darkies do without the Waltons' incredible largesse?? They should be thankful we came overseas and transformed their native cultures into God-fearing, upstanding wage-slavedom, dammit!

  134. Value=Quality/Price... by bartwol · · Score: 1

    "For the vast majority of people, price is way more important than quality."

    The vast majority of people won't spend $200 (or even $20) on a useless box, and to the contrary, the box must ascend much higher on the "quality" scale before it will justify shelling out two c-notes. First look at the percentage of expected home computing functionality that these boxes deliver, and then consider the price. You should see that the vast majority of people are driven by the complex notion of value, not simply price, and that's why these things are selling.

  135. Tiger Direct sold out of 2000+ Lindows comps by Newer+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    TigerDirect sold out of theri entire stock of 2000+ Lindows computers in less then two weeks... but then again, Slashdot readers wouldn't even know that they were for sale there!

  136. Maybe we're giving the consumer too much credit? by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the chief advantage for windows in the consumer space is supposedly that consumers are not smart enough to realize that they can get a computer without windows...

    Maybe they're also not smart enough to realize that they're getting a computer without Windows? If we don't trust the average purchaser to know that just because a P4 has a higher clock rate than an Athlon that it isn't necessarily faster, why would we expect them to realize whether the computer they're buying to send email has windows or lindows? To them it's a thing that sends email.

    The average user probably views the OS and the computer with the same level of separation most of us assign to the transport and network layers.

    Basically indistinguishable parts of the thing you use to get a web page.

  137. And how many... by Jennifer+Ever · · Score: 1

    Are just taking them home and loading pirated copies of Windows onto them?

  138. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by xjerky · · Score: 2

    Whoa, there, cowboy. I wouldn't go as far as to say that they should be kissing our ass as you seem to feel. And "darkies" is a bit extreme, don't you think? They are still human beings, after all. Like I said, I think the practice _is_ scummy, just not actionable. If someone wants to boycott them over it, it's their right, but making them pull out of third-world countries altogether certainly isn't going to be helping the people the protestors claim to care about. Now, if their gripe was that the sweatshop labor reduces American jobs, then I can see that point.

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
  139. Better Homework PC than Windows. by fhage · · Score: 1
    I purchased a Walmart P4 Mandrake system this summer. It's an outstanding machines for students. It shipped with far more games and tools the last Windows PC that I bought from Gateway. I told my kids would that this PC was strictly for doing homework and couldn't run games. It turned out they were really, really happy that dad was very wrong and there were plenty of games that were installed.

    These PCs have the advantage of not being able to run windows software! Yes, this is an advantage from my point of view! I don't wan't my kids and wife loading unknown software. When their friends come over and stick in a virus filled floppy, nothing bad happens!. They get sent trogan e-mail attachments and click on them. No Problems.

  140. Re:whacky Friends/neighbour/relatives?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of Friends/neighbour/relatives do you
    have?? I said to my wife the other day
    "dammit melva, thats the 15th kin to drop by
    and wipe my computa and puta new operating system
    on, I'ma gonna lock the screen door fur good"
    Seriously I don't think that ever happens,
    what planet do you live on?

  141. The TigerDirect Lindows machine sold for $230.00 by Newer+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    The TigerDirect Lindows machine sold for $230.00 and had a 900 meg Duron CPU, 128 megs of RAM, a 20 gig HD, Modem, decent video, NIC, etc. They sold over 2000 of them in less then two weeks and have been out of stock for several more (apparently this machine was one of the biggest sellers in their history).

  142. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by tempest303 · · Score: 2

    heh... actually, I was being sarcastic. You weren't particularly deserving of my bile, but after reading the whole thread, and everyones' comments, I felt the need to parody some of the things I saw from the other posters.

    That said, Walmart-style labor is not just scummy, it's deplorable and inexcusable. I have no problem with overseas labor - I have a problem with forced labor and inhumane conditions.

  143. Anyone know if these have loud fan noise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know how loud these are?

    The only thing holding me back from buying one for my living room (for email and CD/MP3s) is my fear that (like so many cheap PC's) it will drown out the voices inside my head.

    Can't have that. Can I? Nope, they tell me not.

  144. Call the lawyers! by LX.onesizebigger · · Score: 4, Funny
    CNN.com is reporting that sales of the $199 PCs...

    DMCA! DMCA! DMCA!

    --
    I for one welcome our new SCOviet Russian overlords to whom all our base are belong.
  145. PXE support by _fuzz_ · · Score: 2

    Since I can't seem to find any detailed specs, does anyone know if the mobo supports PXE or some other form of net-booting?

    --
    47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
  146. Computers as furniture... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I know a lot of people who have computers for now particually good reason besides impressing their friends/keeping up with the joneses. I know it sounds silly, but it's like putting a shelf full of books you never read in your living room so people'll think you're intelectual or something. Call me a cynic, but it'd be a shame for these computers to be regulated to that fate. So in closing, I hope these computers not only get bought, but used as well.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  147. What's more is... by arcadum · · Score: 1

    Removing artificial trade barriers,free-trade, eventually the world's economy will find equilibrium and we will all be living in the mud.

    1. Re:What's more is... by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      That only holds true if the process of freeing up all that labor doesn't grow the pie.

      The truth is that the rich (1st worlders) can share the wealth by buying the poor off, they can end up like the french aristocracy and get their heads sliced or they can liberate the enslaved 3rd world from the thugs who have run their local states into the ground.

      I prefer option three thank you. It maximizes morality, produced wealth, and doesn't involve too many feel good campaigns that actually screw the poor.

  148. P4 Systems for $340 by meehawl · · Score: 2

    I hate to be a Dell booster, but when they can basically give away P4 1.8GHz machines for $340... with XP included, I have to wonder how thin some of these profit margins actually are.

    --

    Da Blog
  149. $200 Walmart PCs with Debian? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Although Mandrake seems to be an easy-to-use distro, I have found it very annoying. True, the version I used was not 9.0 (I think it was 8.0), but it had major flaws such as gcc 2.96 and WINE not working (I believe the version that came on the distro CDs worked, but was highly outdated, and all attempts to get a later version running failed, with the only information I could find being that it was a Mandrake-specific issue with no known cause or solution). Furthermore it is HUGE, so it may not prove a good option for a low-end system (although these systems are probably powerful enough). Then there is my personal dislike of any RPM-based system. Any RPM-based system I have used screwed up after some time (for some smaller distros this was during or right after installation). Usually this is due to RPM's being agnostic of software installed from source, causing me to install everything with --nodeps, which eventually led to breakage. Is it really so hard to check if the software is installed, rather than the RPM?

    To avoid Holy Wars, I should probably stop writing now. However, since I'm going to bed after this anyway, I don't care much what happens. >;-> So here goes:

    I recommend people who want to try GNU/Linux use Debian. My experience is that if they know enough about computers to even want to try GNU/Linux, they can find their way through the installer. <rant>It's really quite easy to use, just read the damn text. I know it doesn't come with fancy graphics, but why should it?</rant> It is modest on resources (I have KDE2, GNOME, KOffice, Mozilla, Gaim, in under 1 GB on a 233 MHz Pentium MMX with 64 MB core and it runs like a charm), easy to use, and even installing software is a breeze with apt-get (or even KPackage, I have never _had_ to type commands). Everything is thoroughly tested, and it Just Works (WOW). The price you pay is outdated software (testing takes time), and less support due to the fact that Debian is less widespread than certain commercial distros, and maintained by volunteers.

    Debian has its rough edges, mostly during installation, but for everyday use it is a great distro. KNOPPIX is a promising solution to many of Debian's problems, as it does all hardware detection for you, brings up a slick GUI, comes with more up-to-date software, and doesn't even _require_ you to install. It will need some more testing and fixing though, as it didn't quite work on the system I ran it on. Admittedly, that system has pretty uncooperative hardware, but then, Debian 3.0 ran straight out of the box on it.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:$200 Walmart PCs with Debian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wish is (perversely, true) granted: Lindows (preinstalled on Walmart PCs) is Debian-based. So's Xandros, but they're not preinstalling yet.

      (Lycoris is based on Caldera's Linux)

  150. Best ISR quip yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, over using a joke warrants death.

    How true. This is the best one of these I've read yet.

  151. One question by arcadum · · Score: 1

    Have you attempted an install with the latest Mandrake? An article I read compared Mandrake and XP installs. Mandrake required less user input, thusly "wining"

  152. um..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ........not bloodly likely.

  153. I forgot - - - by jafac · · Score: 2

    Is WalMart Evil this week?
    (For exploiting the DMCA re: copyrighted prices)

    or is WalMart Good this week?
    (for selling MS-free PC's)

    I'm so confused. . .

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  154. Only a NIC != Internet ready by yerricde · · Score: 2

    but this machine is Internet ready according to the article, with no need to purchase a NIC.

    A machine with a NIC and no modem, running a Linux OS, is not Internet ready if any of the following statements are true:

    • High-speed Internet access is not available in your geographical area ("sorry, there are too few people in your area to justify putting in an access point").
    • High-speed Internet access is prohibitively expensive in your geographical area ("sure, we have something faster than dial-up, but it's $20 per GB").
    • The monopoly or duopoly provider(s) of high-speed Internet access use a proprietary network stack which is not available for Linux OS *cough* AOL *cough* ("sorry, there are too few users of your OS to justify supporting it").
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  155. maybe you are retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and didnt buy one of there No OS PC.

  156. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates is lying on the floor shaking.

  157. Re:Your .sig by jcast · · Score: 1

    Linux is obsolete. So is ix86. They're popular because they work for everything there users want to do, not because CS thinkers can't come up with genuinely better possibilities.

    --
    There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
    -- David D. Friedman
  158. reason is their monopoly by 2ms · · Score: 1

    Man it's rich.
    MS: "What are you talking about? We don't have a monopoly. Geez we're just innovators making great software that the consumers overwhelmingly choose as their favorite. However, there is no excuse for PC makers giving the consumer the opportunity to not choose Windows because it's impossible for a consumer to legitimately want to install a different OS."

    I guess now that the anti-trust case has declared Microsoft a monopoly and at the same time that the government is ok with it, the obvious criminals are the people who choose not to pay MS $100 or wtvr everytime they buy a PC.

  159. Re:Microsoft could buy them all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. Imagine the Bewulf cluster that BeelzeBill and BeelzeBalmer can build of them. -1 YART (Yet Another Redundant Troll)

  160. Walmart by jefe289 · · Score: 1

    Remember....

    5, count 'em FIVE of the top 10 richest Americans are the children of the late Sam Walton.

    They're way beyond huge.

    1. Re:Walmart by harks · · Score: 1

      sorry i dont have links but i hear that wal~mart employs the second highest amount of people in this country, second only to the US government!

    2. Re:Walmart by hyperturbopete · · Score: 1

      what about GE? dont they have more employees than any company in the world?

  161. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    Just because I don't like lies about 'sweat shop' labor doesn't mean I cotton to illegality. If Wal-Mart has really been running a criminal conspiracy to end-run the union laws then let them burn. Somehow I think reality might just be a little more complicated than that.

  162. Re: Who on /. uses this hunk of junk? Me! by x00101010x · · Score: 2, Informative

    The big flaw with Lindows is the Click-N-Run package (it was discussed in an article previously here on /. but i don't have time to hunt it down right now). Point of it was, it'd be great... Lindows is good, Click-N-Run sucks. Thats how you have to get all your apps. You get 10 free downloads from their junk aisle or something. And there were questions about what if the download fails, does it still count? and what about making backups of your downloaded software (definately not for a novice). Also, supposedly (i have no 1st hand knowledge) some of the software Click-N-Run charges for is avail. for free elsewhere on the web (OpenOffice?). But, i guess they're charging for the convenience of downloading it from them and whatever else their client software does. As far as just Lindows goes, the UI is okay, and the existing apps are still more than you get with a base install of windows (sans bundled software). But it's in no way complete. Also, the target market for this machine is probably not going to have DSL/Cable, so those Click-N-Run downloads (if they go for them) are going to take a while. So, Lindows=NotBad Click-N-Run=JustRun

    --
    DONT PANIC
  163. Why doesnt Dell try this ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice to see that plain jane Walmart selling linux.
    I would like Dell to try this or maybe they dont
    have balls.to do it I dont see any pc loaded with Redaht 8.0 selling as Desktop on their web site.

    At least Dell should give customer option to buy Redhat 8.0 OS as on their desktop with open foffice or star office and show the price difference getting windoze os and MS office.

  164. hmmmmm by redshift-systems · · Score: 1

    No monitor? No modem? So, not only can you not connect to the internet, but you cannot see what it is you're not doing. Surely they could have slapped together a $249 tag including monitor/modem and from what I gather a better free (beer) distro.

  165. they will just install windows by jkcity · · Score: 1

    The majority of people who would buy a $199 machine woudl have no idea how to run anything without windows on it.

    I would guess that nearly all of these machines will have a copy of windows on them within a month of purchase.

    1. Re:they will just install windows by vidarh · · Score: 2

      The majority of people who have no idea of how to run anything without Windows on it won't know how to install Windows.

  166. Why is this cheap? by salvius · · Score: 1

    The only reason I see as to why this is popular is because it is found in WalMart. I bought a computer for my girlfriend a week ago, with almost the same specs, but a 100 MHz faster, and it came with Windows 98, which, granted, got changed to Mandrake. Oh, and it also had a real video card. The price was $260 Canadian. So, it was a fair bit cheaper too than this. Honestly, though, just because it comes without Windows doesn't mean that it is immedietely a billion dollars cheaper. The licenses for integrated Win 98 is similar to that of Lindows. Instead, how about packing it with REAL Linux? Would that not be cheaper, as it would not cost consumers a penny more.

    1. Re:Why is this cheap? by qirien · · Score: 1

      Maybe for Win98, but you can hardly buy a computer with a Win98 license anymore - they're all WinXP or Win2K, which are ridiculously expensive.

      --
      -- Qirien, Academy of Defenestration
      "Who do you want to defenestrate today?"
  167. Poor parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel bad for the parents of the kids who get these things for Christmas because the parents didn't understand that just because it was a computer doesn't mean it'll run any of those games the kid wants to play. Oh well. Fine for email and stuff, tho, although I still wouldn't pay anything less than $600 for a machine I would use personally.

  168. Yes, intelligent! (Re:Re:Confirmation from...) by calm_rising · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I said: I read slashdot because it's so hard to find anything else intelligent to read.

    People replied: And Slashdot intelligent? Haw.... It's worse out there on the Internet than we thought.... Keep searching...

    Wow, that was a robust response. No kidding, guys&gals. Without the time or patience to surf, I used to have to tolerate the big-media news feeds, who seem to think that Winona Ryder Busted for Shoplifting is big news.

    Admittedly, to refine the /. content, I read at a +3 threshold with -2 for Funny and +1 for Insightful. I only lower the threshold if a thread interests me enough to consider replying (so that I won't be redundant). Try those settings for yourself; suddenly, /. seems pretty damn smart.

    P.S. Sorry if this is offtopic; mod me down if you must. I know that those replies were just friendly jesting, but the topic touched a nerve. I hate stupidity.

    1. Re:Yes, intelligent! (Re:Re:Confirmation from...) by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Each negative response to your comment that doesn't offer an alternative only goes to show where the stupidity comes from.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    2. Re:Yes, intelligent! (Re:Re:Confirmation from...) by calm_rising · · Score: 1

      Like yours? :D

      Sorry, that was mean. I hear what you're saying.

    3. Re:Yes, intelligent! (Re:Re:Confirmation from...) by shreak · · Score: 2

      Hear! Hear!

      I'm software developer (currently medical practice management software - bleh). I read Slashdot at 4+, -2 for funny and there are still a bunch of stupid comments.

      The only time I /. at a lower threashold is when I'm moderating, then I go at 1+ (I used to try -1+, but I just can't take it)

      Unfilterd slashdot is not recommended, it can cause blindness, anti-social behavior and general stupidness.

      =Shreak

  169. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by dbrutus · · Score: 1

    I'm proud I've never contributed a dime to that buffoon's income.

  170. Walmart is the biggest employer in the US. by joejoejoejoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Walmart is the biggest employer in the US. As in they have more employees than any other company.

    http://www.frameastock.com/gifs/largest.html
    - see for your self.
    This is just meant to reinforce the fact of how huge they are, and how big an impact they can have on, well anything.

    --
    Silly Rabbit: tricks are for kids.
  171. "Average" Users don't install OSes! by XPisthenewNT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My father is trying to start a software company, and I know for a fact that he could not install Windows. Heck, a friend of mine just graduated with a Computer Science degree from my university, and I had to walk her through installing Windows 98 (the only reasonable windows to install on a machine with these specs). I spent 2 hours on the phone with her, and she is to this day proud to have "done it herself". Installing an OS is nothing a typical user can do. Just because we have done it thousands of times, doesn't mean the "Average" user can use fdisk, format, etc. Never overestimate the user!

  172. Re:Your .sig by jsse · · Score: 1

    There's always cases where most popular hardware aren't the best you can find, e.g. Gameboy, PS1, etc..

    I just find the article I quote in sig interesting. I don't think Linux would be obsoleted any time soon. Prof. Tanenbaum just ate the sour grape when his work was being forked without his consent, but his points are still valid today. :)

  173. Just goes to show you... by nougatmachine · · Score: 2
    There are a LOT of people who don't think they need Microsoft on their computer. I'm still convinced that one of Apple's biggest problems is that you can't BUY them anywhere. They have no visibility. My parents went computer shopping this summer (before I had switched), and they went to OfficeMax to window shop. You wouldn't know that Apple existed in that store, even though they carried every other manufacturere (minus Dell of course).

    Now, everybody in the South goes to WalMart for practically everything. I can't stand the warehouse atmosphere of the place, but oh well. The point is that, here we have a non-Microsoft computer with good visibility. True, many of the people buying it do so because it's cheap, but the fact remains:they didn't care that it didn't have Windows! More non-Microsoft computers need to get on the shelves and in the stores where people who don't read Slashdot will have corporeal evidence that they exist, and I firmly believe Microsoft's monopoly would crumble.

  174. sorry man who blames his tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "It's a sorry man who blames his tools."

    Well, either that or a man with a small tool. It's hard to tell.

  175. New Zealand by pkplex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a franchise in New Zealand called Dick Smiths, which is a electronics type place which sells a lot of stuff for the home. Anyway, They started selling headless boxen with Mandrake installed... and when they released them they sold out real quick. Im not sure if it was because of Linux, The price, or both. But one thing is for sure, Linux is really starting to get out there.

  176. BUMP THIS PARENT POST!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is easily the most insightful comment yet!

    Moderators, please mod up this parent post!!

  177. Re:Maybe we're giving the consumer too much credit by Sandcastle · · Score: 1

    I've noticed this problem lately aswell. I started looking to buy a new PC recently, and couldn't believe how cheap a lot of them were compared to last time I looked. Most of them were being sold without an OS at all, which explains a couple of hundred $ of the price.

    While it's great that we can now buy PC's without Windows when we as "educated" IT people know that is what we want, it is starting to become another "gotcha" for Billy the Goose down the road when he buys one.

    I'm not sure about the whole "microsoft will benefit" theory, whether it's because of them being proved right or because people will start realising how much they like having an OS compared to no OS on their PC and still think MS in the only option, but it's certainly going to keep aggravating those who don't know much about PC's who get it home and can't use their latest big budget purchase.

    I've heard of enough cases of people getting their PC's home, turing it on and then... nothing. Salepeople who will try to sell a PC without mentioning the lack of OS to people who don't understand the distinction between hardware and OS, and there are a lot of them out there. Think about it, they sold probably a few dollars more hardware than they would otherwise have done, and the user "has" to come back and buy an OS anyway right?

    We need to be careful about how this is presented to users, or it will be like those only $14999 for a new car prices, but buy the time there is stamp duty etc. etc. it's a lot more than you were planning on spending, and it's often nearly to late to change your mind. Another option that isn't really an option.

    The whole MS Office vs. OpenOffice etc. is a different matter...

    Just something to think about.

    --
    The fact that a fish swims in water does not make it an expert in fluid dynamics. GogglesPisano (199483)
  178. Not sure on this one, but.... by nyseal · · Score: 1

    ....may posters have said that they wonder if the owners of these new boxen will replace Mandrake or Lindows with XP; is this even possible given XP's minimum requirements? At 800 MHz I would think the PC would be pushed, at a minimum, to its maximum level of performance utilizing the OS alone besides whatever software would otherwise be installed by the consumer. Hell, one (high end) game installation and there you go, BOOM. Now you start running programs in the background (AV, firewall, etc...). Is this even possible?

    --
    [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
  179. DSL & AOL? by SpikeSpiff · · Score: 1
    One thing no one has addressed is how easy Lindows is to connect to commerical internet services. In particular, Verizon DSL and AOL require clients to connect. Does anyone have any experience running Lindows or other Linuxes with the big consumer services?

    A consumer windows replacement needs to be able to support consumer internet services.

    --
    "All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
    1. Re:DSL & AOL? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Verizon DSL needs a very LITE client to connect. Case-In-Point: A Linksys DSL router can connect to Verizon DSL without the need of any client software. All you need to do is type in the username, password, click 1 or 2 check-boxes, and you can be connected 24/7.

  180. OSless PC by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 2
    We bought one of the Walmart's OSless PC's a few months back. I was fairly impressed witht eh sytems for the cost. It was a basic Athlon ZP 1800 with 256mb DDR PC2100, 40 GB HDD and 4x CDWriter. IIRC it was $488. The board in the system was an MSI km266. The MSI KM266 is kinda like a highly integrated KT266 board and gives you most of the overclocking fucntions that the KT266 and KT 333 borads from MSI offer. mandrake 8.1 installed on the system like it was made specially for it.

    The ddr which came witht he system was a bit of a surprise, it was unbranded, but took aggressive memory timing (2-2-5-2-4) and cas 2. Pushing the FSB up to 136+ gave me 2GB/s memroy bandwidth in Sandra which made the onboard s3 graphics fairly decent.

    The case was not the most attractive thing in the world, but it was damn sturdy and the quality seemed on par with cases from Antec.

    Even with Windows, these machines are a great bargain and offer quality parts whcih exceed anything you can expect to get from Dell or Gateway costing a few hundred more.

    --
    ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
  181. What kind of reality pills are you taking? by dsfox · · Score: 2

    Average joe buys a PC and re-installs the OS? Yeah right.

  182. LindowsOS is hands down the best Linux for Novice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I bought one of these computers for my 10 year old daughter. She loves it. I plugged it into my Cable modem and wham! It was on the net. It is ultra easy to use, and she loves installing games and software with Click-N-Run. I can't EVEN imagine giving her RedHat or Mandrake, that would just be WRONG.

    Enough with the LindowsOS bashing. 99% of you here have never even tried it. It installs very quickly, recognizes more hardware than most distros, and is extremely polished and stable.

    And what's all this Bull S$%^ about running as Root? Hello??? It's as simple as going to their "Launch Menu" and selecting the User Manager. Bingo, Bango...users and not running as root.

    Mark

  183. Re: Who on /. uses this hunk of junk? Me! by juhaz · · Score: 1

    ALL of at least most of the software Click-N-Run "charges" (they don't charge for the software, but the service).

    Lindows is Debian-based, though, so if you know about it, you don't even need to hunt software online instead of Click-N-Run, just "apt-get software" does it 99% of the time, or if you are into GUI stuff, use Synaptic... probably EASIER than cnr when you get used to it.

    I've been using apt4rpm with freshrpms repository on my RH (first 7.x, now 8) for ages and gotta admit - that thing ROCKS. No wonder debianists are so snobist about it, too bad it's not their exclusive right any more ;)

  184. No monitor,.. what about TV? by AbRASiON · · Score: 0

    How many of these users will also try to hook it up to the lounge tv (seriously) just like a console or older computers? (amiga / c64?)

  185. True, they don't know what a processor is... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    But they do know Pentium = Computer! That's more what I was trying to say.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  186. Biased? by aerojad · · Score: 1

    The Wal-Mart machines are full-fledged, if low-powered, computers, but they are not loaded with Microsoft's Windows software or the best known microchips -- meaning that the average user will not get exactly what he or she is used to. Do you really think the average user would even be able to notice the difference, much less care, aside from having to buy a copy of Windows or Linux. Hopefully, if anything, this will show the average user that there is no difference between Intel and non-Intel, and that the bloated proces for Intel processors is insane, and isn't worth paying.

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
  187. AWESOME!!! by Hassman · · Score: 0, Troll

    I totally care about this issue and am very interested on how... oh wait. It was just gas.

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  188. Vacuum cleaner bags. by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a good start into a market void, where we NEED a commodity device. Think about all the $15 - $50 PDA's. Sure they don't run palmOS. They can't do a lot of things a CE device can. SO? There's a market for them. How about those "laptops" for little kids? They're just toys. Some of them do a minimal amount of wordprocessing or calculator functions, or maybe they just moo and oink, who cares?

    So there's a niche where a cheap as hell PC that does the stuff that a PC does, but is cheap as hell, would be very marketable. To all those folks who want a PDA, but don't want to spend the bucks for a Palm, and certainly not for something like a Zarus. Just like there's expensive phones and cheap as hell phones. Or cheap stereos.

    There's a market for a cheap computer. If it does what it needs to do, software and file compatability be damned. There are a whole lot of people that, if they can't open a particular file format or view some funky proprietary content on the web, will just go "huh? oh well." and they'll get on with their lives! I'll bet if you had a few games for the platform that weren't on other platforms, they'd sell, too. And people would not be all that upset that Windows games don't work, provided you did not give them that expectation. People may not be knowledgeable, but they are NOT stupid. (I hail from a small town in East Texas, and believe I'm qualified to speak on that matter!)

    I really don't think incompatability would hurt here as much as other people seem to think it will, and certainly not as much as Microsoft is betting it will. Do the people with $10 pda's care if they can't run palm apps? Do you really think the people with self-contained workflow are going to care whether they run Koffice, Openoffice, or word?

    Microsoft, and all the software publishers (games mostly!) have created the expectation in consumers that "computer == runs windows software" but, I don't think that'll be terribly hard to break. Look at the console market, or any other product that has an aftermarket where accessories on one brand are incompatible with another.

    Vacuum cleaner bags. They get it. I buy a Hoover, I need Type H bags. I buy a Eureka, I need type AA bags. I'll even bet some of them check the price, and they see if H bags are $3.00 and AA bags are $1.50, it influences their decision. But they get it, and they don't end up returning the Eureka because it doesn't use the Hoover bag.

    Game consoles. Nobody has a problem understanding that Nintendo games don't fit Sony. And they're okay with that. Camera film comes to mind as another example, but seems somewhat anachronistic today.

    So it doesn't come with Word? Well, that's a social problem for some people. The idea that not being able (or willing) to read a Word Doc might cost your job, etc.

    Not everybody has their career resting on being able to open or save a powerpoint or a word doc.
    Lots of us are in that predicament, but, we're not the ones buying a $50 PC, are we? (Yes I know the lindows box is more like $200, but, I'm seeing the possibility).

    The main thing that distinguishes "Computers" and "Peripherals, Software" from "Vacuum cleaners" and "Bags" is that the retailers have thoroughly ingrained the notion that "Computer == Windows" into the consumer's mind. But guess what? They can STILL sell something else, as long as they don't instill a false expectation in that customer.

    To be sure, there will be salespeople claiming that Lindows runs Game X, Application Y. There will be people returning these things, partly just because people return things to Walmart, and partly because it hasn't met their expectations.
    There will be people who immediately wipe the disk and install windows on it.

    And there will be people who use the system, never adding anything to it, happily emailing stories about the newborn poodle or how the floor of the shed needs to be fixed and can you pay the insurance on the truck this month to their kids and grandkids on the west coast. There will be a web resource here and there that won't load in opera or mozilla or whatever, sure, but if it *WORKS* and does what the customer expects it to do, it DOESN'T MATTER ONE BIT that it isn't Windows!

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  189. Lindows NOMORE by dkeav · · Score: 1

    i just purchased one of those badbuys for my grandma to play solitare on(dont ask) guess what no more Lindows they are now running Lycoris dont know how much that changes things, ive heard good things about lycoris and not lindows, but as long as it has solitare we are good to go :)

    1. Re:Lindows NOMORE by SmartGamer · · Score: 1

      This is actually very telling, and I appreciate the example.

      Your post just (accidentally?) rubbed it in one simple, undeniable, glaringly obvious fact:

      Users don't care what OS they're using as long as it does what they want.

      Which would be against the so-called "brand loyalty" that Microsoft has claimed to have built. "Brand hatred" is a lot easier to create, and I think they've made more of that.

      I'd observe that this is a nice big hole that will, hopefully, be exploited. Soon, if possible. All that has to be done to beat M$ is to create an OS with more functionality than Windows and at least as gooey of a GUI.

      The functionality part is the challenge, as such functionality also includes every single pieces of software ever made for Windows. That's a lot to top.

      On the flip side, most of it's pretty inane, and most end-users don't care that much about old software. (I'm a hardcore NetHack player myself, and I prefer EMACS for my editing needs.) So "all" that has to be beaten out or copied is all the new stuff.

      Lindows has real potential, especially as a Budget Alternative. But the real trial is if the company has the resources not only to survive until it gets some real market share, but also to survive Microsoft's inevitable FUD attacks (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) and equally inevitable legal attacks.

      In conclusion? If you could create and advertise a breed of octopus that actually did do everything that Windows did, and costs less, it would sell.

      --
      Warning: Poster of this comment is a nerd. Just like everybody else here.
  190. Re:Boxes? surely you meant boxen? by ces · · Score: 2

    Don't you mean UNIXEN? Now excuse me I have to go reboot the Vaxen.

    --
    Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  191. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mini ITX , is pretty new and offer more then what is offered on there.

    here is a link describing the actual machine :

    http://newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/10/23/143 32 15&mode=thread&tid=7

    *The case is an Enlight case that is similar to model 7305-mATX found on the Enlight wWb site.

    *The processor is a VIA C3 800Mhz running at 133 MHz frontside bus. It comes with a heat sink and fan. This processor is very stable, energy efficient and is quite adequate for the tasks this computer was designed to perform. If you don't already know you need a faster processor, this will get the job done quickly.

    *The system board is a Giga-Byte model GA-6VEML. It's nice board with features that include an often hard-to-find ISA slot. The BIOS is full of options unlike most manufactured PC BIOS configuration utilities.

    *The keyboard is a Turbo-Xwing KB-3001 R+ (without wrist rest). It includes the useless Microsoft operating system keys and is full size. This keyboard adjusts to three angle positions and works well.

    *The mouse is a KeyMouse MS-303. It is a three-button scroll mouse with a PS/2 plug. The wheel functions as the third button and scroll. This mouse serves its purpose, but the cord is too short for many installations.

    *The speakers are ACCUBASS AC-180 (Outpost.com). They are powered, include a headphone jack and work quite well. I had a problem with one of the speakers, two screws were only screwed in half way and another screw had been screwed in too tight and broke the catch inside the speaker housing. I didn't attempt to send this back as it works fine with only three screws attached. We are talking about $8 speakers here. I'm not concerned, but Wal-Mart did include a USPS return label if I wished to return it.

    *The system comes with a Kingston KVR133X64C3/128 memory module. Contrary to what I like to call "Microsoft reviewers" (reviewers who base hardware requirements on that of the latest Microsoft operating system instead of the operating system the computer was built to run.), 128MB is adequate to run the LindowsOS desktop and common desktop applications; however, there is a slot available to upgrade the memory if you so desire.

    *The CD-ROM is a NEC CD-3002A .

    *The hard drive is a Maxtor 10GB 5400rpm Fireball 541DX Model 2B010H1. This is plenty of room to run LindowsOS 2.0 and common desktop applications.

    *The floppy cable is included in a bag with the motherboard manual, the power cord, installation guide, USPS return label and a motherboard utility CD.

  192. Re:Maybe we're giving the consumer too much credit by shaitand · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's why this is perfect, it's not a no OS at all solution, there is an OS on the machine. True grandma probably does not make a distinction between MS and linux, but her grandkids will and suddenly become aware that there are other things than microsoft in the world and that's a start... it doesn't really matter if they like linux. Linux is just another OS, they don't have to like linux, or BSD, just knowing there are other things out there is a start. Some will take the next step and play with them. Some will like them. Other's will like them better but not enough, contribute to something that already exists, or perhaps come up with something better.

  193. So don't buy so expensive by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    I think this is scary because people like us who actually need/use higher end hardware will end up paying more.

    I wonder how many people actually need higher end hardware. I still use a PII/266, and the only thing that I really would like to do that I can't is software DVD decoding. That becomes feasible at about a PII/400. Beyond that...well, there are games, but there are always games, and games hardly classify as a "need" item.

    What you're identifying is that there's a broad spectrum of products out there. Maybe you drive...oh, I don't know. A Ford. Nothing wrong with that Ford. Sure, there are Ferraris out there, but that doesn't make the Ford any worse, except maybe as a status symbol. Don't measure what's "good" by what is "most expensive" or even "best". Just because there's something "better" out there doesn't mean that you need it.

    I have to buy a very high end hard drive in the SCSI range if I want to get a decent warranty.

    It certainly depends on your idea of a "decent" warranty. Most people are thinking about upgrading their hard drives after about three years or so, which is available even on the cheapest hard drives through extended warranties. You really don't need an $800 SCSI hard drive (and the surprisingly little amount of reliability said money buys you) to get reasonable storage.

    Ever notice that all the reasonably priced network cards have cheapo Realtek chipsets?

    You know, the only real user-noticable difference I've seen at a basic functionality level (ignoring Wake On LAN and stuff like that) is in driver quality. 3com does have (had) significantly more solid Linux drivers -- it used to be that both tulip and rtk-8139 (or whatever the name was) did a full reset after 16 failed transmits -- disaster on a totally saturated Ethernet. It required about two seconds. My 3c905b's driver, OTOH, kept on chugging.

    If you open up your RealTek driver, you'll notice lots of nasty comments from Donald Becker (Mister Linux Ethernet himself) about lousy RealTek design, but there really isn't a whole lot of bad stuff to them in a normal environment. So maybe there's something I'm missing. But frankly, I can't pick up any difference between Ethernet cards -- just the drivers.

    Cases are really cheap and I want a good one, I probably have to send CAD$200+ to get an aluminum one with good airflow and slots for HDD cooling fans.

    So don't build a system that generates that much heat. It is a bit depressing that hardware manufacturers have strayed a bit far towards the "damn the heat, performance at all costs" path, but you really do not need an aluminum case or hard drive fans. Get some nice cool quiet 5400 RPM drives, and relax.

    Server quality mobos aren't exactly cheap either.

    "Server quality"? What, you expect your ordinary old motherboard to spontaneously fail? It's solid state. Unless you damage the thing, it's going to be fine.

    Twice in my life, I've blamed a motherboard for hardware issues. Both times it was a PCI card (once video, once Firewire). Motherboards are tough little beasts -- you really do not need a "server quality mobo", whatever you mean by that.

    1. Re:So don't buy so expensive by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "I wonder how many people actually need higher end hardware. I still use a PII/266, and the only thing that I really would like to do that I can't is software DVD decoding. That becomes feasible at about a PII/400."

      Just in case you didn't know, you can also get PCI cards to do that. It might be a more versatile solution on the long run.

  194. What is with the *hatred* of Wal-Mart by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I could never understand why people bitterly hate Wal-Mart so much. They are simply not a bad company. They provide reasonable products, pretty good returns, and pretty good prices. Yes, they beat a lot of competitors (and this is partly a result of these facts). But from a consumer's point of view, Wal-Mart is a Good Thing.

    1. Re:What is with the *hatred* of Wal-Mart by macshit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I find Walmart a horrid, soul-sucking place.

      I don't know why others hate them, but I hate them for several reasons -- (1) because they're simply big, cold, and impersonal, and just not pleasant to be in, but also (2) because they're a particularly extreme example of the increasing homogenization of culture in the U.S., and the obsession with low-price at the expense of any other measure of value (such as pleasant stores).

      Sure, when a walmart bulldozes into town, they offer very good prices, a pretty reasonable selection of merchandise, and a certain sort of convenience. Consumers like this.

      They like it so much, that they shop at walmart instead of old-Joe's local crap-n-stuff store (established 1837) to get that extra 5% off, and because Joe hasn't updated some of his inventory since 1853. Unless Joe is pretty clever, he probably then goes out of business.

      `Good riddance' a lot of people think, Joe's place was always pretty lame anyway.

      After a few years, they notice that the community seems somehow colder and more impersonal than it used to. Is it just nostalgia? Probably some of it is -- but I'll bet part of it is Joe.

      Granted this has been going on for a long time, and Walmart's just more noticable because they're very good at it. Probably not much could be done to save old Joe, but I really hope there's a new generation of Joes out there that hate walmart like I do, and who have enough business accumen to somehow replace some of what has been lost. Maybe they can use some of the tools Walmart uses (e.g., computer technology), but still manage to make something local instead of a cookie-cutter outlet of a vast corporation.

      Personally I try to spend my money in ways that reflect what I said above -- I'll shop a store that I like, even if it costs more, because I know my money is paying for more than just the physical product.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    2. Re:What is with the *hatred* of Wal-Mart by zenray · · Score: 1

      Why I dislike Wal-Mart, a lot. They are the number two employer of people in the world because thay hire most of the workers as part-timers. This lets them get away without paying the extra helth, insurance, vacation benfites that a full-time employee woud get. They are also very anti-union. When one Wal-mart Supercenter butchers group successfully unionized Wal-Mart's responce was to completely elimate the need for butchers by changing their policy and started buying prepackaged meats only.

      --
      zenray
  195. Click-N-Run PATENT Issue(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone have an update on the patent issues - wasn't Michael Robertson trying to patent the one-click-software install (a la amazon.com?)

    Or did someone at the patent office realize that anyone running Debian prior to Lindows release could claim prior art if they had an icon for apt-get?

  196. In Soviet Russia by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    The computer wants to see you.

  197. Those are better the box I'm on right now by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1
    My computer is five years old.

    Hmmm....

  198. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Checking Account # 005671458120
    Routing # 857364758

    Name: Notver Ysmart
    Address: 4563 Takeme Lane
    Freeport, Bahamas

    Phone: +07 831 227 6643
    Please contact me for passports and signature copies.

    ---
    Cheers!




    I highly recommend not trying to dial that number. I think that area code is one of those Bahama scam numbers that will charge you 2000 dollars a minute. Just warning you.

  199. Yeah, like they really keep Lindows... by rogerzilla · · Score: 1

    What are the odds that half these machines have their hard disks wiped as soon as they're out of the box, and a pirate copy of Windows installed? "Free" Windows is terribly easy to find.

  200. PCs and Lies by geoff+lane · · Score: 2

    MS need the buyers of PCs not to understand how they work. There is a delibrate attempt by MS to blur the boundary between apps, OS and hardware so the public doesn't realise that it's the applications that they actually want to run. If Joe Public suddenly realises that they can run email, web, wp, calender etc on any platform without any important change to the user interface, MS will lose control of the market.

  201. Re:Maybe we're giving the consumer too much credit by elgaard · · Score: 1

    Gransma's are just fine.
    Most grandma's might not contribute code (im sure some do).

    But if a million grandma's start surfing the net with
    mozilla and konqueror and read documents with OO
    or KWord, it will make life a little easier for all of us.

    And hardware manufacturers will be
    more Linux-friendly (=BSD friendly etc) if they see a
    chance to get their product in a Walmart computer. They dont care
    if grandma knows what OS she is running.

  202. TigerDirect by acoustix · · Score: 2

    I bought a $230 computer from TigerDirect that has 1300MHz Duron, 128 RAM, 10G HD, Built-in NIC and Video, and hardware 56k modem. The package included Lindows 2.0 and an office app.

    very reasonable.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  203. How good is it really? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While having Wal-Mart sell Lindows is interetsing, I'm not sure how much benefit Linux will ultimately reap, because:

    1. People will not necessarily associate Lindows with Linux - more likely think it's a cheap Windows clone;

    2. If and when Lindows doesn't run something, they'll assume it's Lindows fault, not that that's the price of running Lindows; so, If they do link Lindows with Linux, they assume it's an OS for cheap machines; and that Linux has all the faults and problems that Lindows has (i.e. not 100% Windows compatable) Never mind it isn't intended to be a Windows clone, any bad impressions of Lindows will reflect on Linux.

    As a side note, it's interesting that Wal-mart, another favorite /. target, is all of a sudden one of the good guys. (The enemy of my enemy is my friend?)

    Also, how well is Lindows complying with GPL terms? If they are successfull, they may be reluctant to give away what they view as the foundation of tehir success, and have the cash to fend off challenges.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  204. Your aunt *used* to work at Wal-mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She no longer is. As we speak, your aunt is fired but does not know it yet.

    Walmart

  205. Is this Mini-ITX? by MikeFM · · Score: 2

    Is this a standard Mini-ITX system? If so you could buy one of these and move it into a sexier case and have a great toaster sized system for elss than buying the parts alone would probably cost you and a left over case to slap a normal Micro-ATX mobo in.

    I'm thinking of buying one of these to use as a video server. Drop in a couple 130 gigger drives (the biggest it can handle) and store ripped dvd's and cd's that can be played over the network or directly to the tv if this has the noraml tv-out port mini-ITX mobo's have. Trying to replace my vcr/dvd/cd players with a single small/cheap box.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  206. Re:Maybe we're giving the consumer too much credit by dohcvtec · · Score: 2

    The average user probably views the OS and the computer with the same level of separation...
    Heh, whenever I mention the term "operating system" to less knowledgable people (actually make that most people) they have no idea what I'm talking about. I get "What's an operating system?" Or "What's the desktop?" Basically I end up defining the operating system as "Windows." Try explaining Unix/Linux/BSD to someone who doesn't even know what an operating system is.

    --
    -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
  207. Re:Maybe we're giving the consumer too much credit by jonadab · · Score: 2

    > Maybe they're also not smart enough to realize that they're
    > getting a computer without Windows?

    Sure, but when they take it home and use it, will they notice even
    then? Not likely. Eventually someone will point it out to them:
    "Hey, I don't recognise your Windows, it's different from mine. I
    bet it's not Microsoft at all." Will they care? Or will they be
    like "Huh, well, I don't know about that, but when I click the
    little envelope thingy I get my mail."

    If Wal*Mart gets a small enough number of returns on these things,
    and enough sales, maybe they'll decide to carry them in the actual
    _stores_...

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  208. hypocrites by mapmaker · · Score: 1
    They WILL NOT carry a game with an M rating. Period.

    Yet they happily sell guns. Anyone else think this is fcuked up?

    1. Re:hypocrites by Viewsonic · · Score: 2

      Cool to know that you're associating guns = violence. Look out, those crazy rabit hunters and target shooters are gunna kill you for saying that! They got their guns and all, so that must mean they're cold blooded killers!

    2. Re:hypocrites by mapmaker · · Score: 1
      Um, yeah. guns = violence.

      I mean, what can you do with a gun? Open a can of soup? Change a car tire? Connect to the internet?

      The only thing you can do with a gun is shoot things. Shooting things *is* violence, ergo guns == violence.

      I acknowledge your point though. Most guns are purchased by people who are not using them to kill other people.

      But this does not refute my point, which was this: Which product - an M rated video game or a shotgun - has more potential for abuse in the hands of a sociopathic murderer? The exclusion of which product from Wal-Mart's shelves is more likely to increase the public good (ie, fewer murders)?

  209. your .sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anthrax?
    animal sex?
    anal cox?
    anthropomorphism?
    applebees?
    asphyxia?
    ar mpit hair?

    what is it already?

  210. Hey, what about me? by vizualizr · · Score: 1

    Don't I count, too?

    Sincerely,

    Saipan

    --
    anything i tell you will cloud your opinion.
  211. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

    You have never seen his movie, you know nothing about him, but you call him a buffoon? Where's all the blind hate coming from? rent one of his documentory's. "Roger and Me" is his first one. or see his latest "Bowling for Columbine". Incredible work.

  212. Totally UNTRUE. They sell GTA, etc.. walmart.com ! by Viewsonic · · Score: 2

    I dunno what crack this guy is smoking, but Walmart does indeed sell Mature rated games. They just refused to sell BMW XXX because it was ADULT ONLY. A big step from Mature. You can buy Grand Theft Auto, and the new Vice City, etc etc .. They have all the violent shooters, they have id's DOOM and QUAKE games, Unreal Tournament, etc etc.. I find it funny when someone makes stuff up.. Your figure of Walmart selling 25% of ALL games in the USA is also bogus. Try less than 1 percent. Thanks.

  213. They Got some in stock yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you have to call them, they sell out faster then they can put them on the website.

    I just happen to call about something else and I jjust asked about them. They guy said they were getting some instock soon. So I got a bunch

  214. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've never seen any of his movies, yet I hate the man. I've seen enough interviews and excerpts to know that he is the very definition of sophistry. He uses simplistic and shallow reasoning to demonize people for his own personal gain.

    He reminds me of Noam Chomsky, in a way. The both take facts out of context and shine them in the worst light possible while completely ignoring any facts that don't fit their twisted world view. The difference between Chomsky and Moore is that Chomsky is extremely intelligent but literally insane, and Moore is stupid but crafty and devious. Moore knows exactly what he's doing by using only emotional manipulation for his movie subjects, but is too intellectually limited to do complete, in-depth analysis of his documentary subjects.

    Regardless of whether you agree with his politics or not, that guy is the devil.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  215. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

    The both take facts out of context and shine them in the worst light possible while completely ignoring any facts that don't fit their twisted world view.

    This is an out right lie. Watch "Bowling for Columbine" for his quest to find out why American's murder rate is so much higher than any other country. He provides you a lot of information and leaves it up for you to decide at the end. It dosn't matter what side of the fence your on, as he also gets in the face of the Liberal creator of the fox show COPS. In this movie Moore takes in everything into account. He looks into every nook an cranny hoping to find an answer. He doesn't ignore anything like you assume.

    What's wrong with puting a real face to the statistics? Any one can look at the numbers, but to see it in the lives of real people is something you don't normaly see. It can and will give you a better grasp as to what's actualy going on.

    Your handle is "Reality Master", yet you say Moore's evil without even seeing what this man actually does for a living. What kind of reality is that? If you had actually seen one of his documentaries I'd give you a lot more credit.

  216. Re: Who on /. uses this hunk of junk? Me! by writertype · · Score: 1

    So has anyone published a guide to modding your old G4 case into a litter box?

  217. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

    In this movie Moore takes in everything into account. He looks into every nook an cranny hoping to find an answer. He doesn't ignore anything like you assume.

    OK, here's a good example of what I'm talking about. From someone who saw the movie:

    I thought Moore's film was very good, it made me think and laugh quite a bit and I did enjoy it. However, I have a few beefs with it. The first is how Moore manipulates the numbers. Fine, we here in Canada have fewer gun murders than the US (11 000 to 165 in the film), however, Moore fails to mention that the US has a population of 250 000 000 and that Canada has a population of 30 000 000. Thus, it is more important to look at the ratio of murders than the actual total number, because it is ludicrous to compare two countries' murder numbers, especially when one country has 220 000 000 more people than the other! This is a however a great propaganda movie for the left and you gotta love it when actors look like idiots, eh Hestin?? 7 out of 10.

    So explain to me how someone can be intellectually honest as you claim, yet quote raw murder numbers without accounting for dramatic differences in population? Answer: emotional manipulation. It has a bigger emotional impact to compare 11,000 to 165.

    And his tactic of making anyone he doesn't like look like an idiot through clever cutting and leading questions is typical moore.

    What's wrong with puting a real face to the statistics?

    Nothing, as long as it's not used for dishonest manipulation. It's no better than when Meryl Streep got up in front of Congress screeching "won't someone think of the children" to complain about Alar -- when there was absolutely no safety risk at all. Or silicone breast implants -- which are completely safe, but emotional manipulation of juries caused the bankruptcy of a major company.

    That's what offends me so much about Michael Moore. He uses emotional manipulation to try and cloud the issues. Sure, maybe he doesn't come out and say "I want you to think this", but what's the difference when he stacks the deck so obviously?

    He probably offends me more than he really warrants, since he has so little actual relevence, but I absolutely DETEST emotional manipulation. It's not the way to get to the heart of important issues.

    yet you say Moore's evil without even seeing what this man actually does for a living.

    Like I said, I haven't seen his films all the way through, but I've seen enough exerpts and seen enough interviews to know what he's about. Or to put it another way, you don't have to have read Mein Kampf to know Hitler was a bad guy.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  218. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

    So explain to me how someone can be intellectually honest as you claim, yet quote raw murder numbers without accounting for dramatic differences in population? Answer: emotional manipulation. It has a bigger emotional impact to compare 11,000 to 165.

    So Moore earlier compared why Americans have a higher murder rate than Europe. But then that wasn't entirely fair becuause its against the law to own a gun in Europe. So He compared a small town in Canda to a larger city in the U.S. which He admited that wasn't fair either. So he moved to the city of Tronto which was about the same size as the city he was comparing in the U.S. which was Detroit. Both of the cities have about 4 million people. The difference in gun related murder is now blazingly obvious. If you had watched the whole movie you would now about the part I'm talking about.

    Now sure take the ratio of population (both countires) and the ratio of murders (both countries) and do the math. I'll bet you anything the U.S. has way more gun related murders than canada. Now I wasn't writing down the stats when I was watching the movie, but that sounds like a good idea and that's something I'll do when I rent it.

    Anyways, were probably not going to come to any agreement anytime soon. But I still think you should see if for yourself.

  219. I like the eMachines quote by icantblvitsnotbutter · · Score: 1

    "When you switch operating systems, millions of programs no longer work. The person next door can't help you."

    I never had a problem like that with Windows.

    Oh, and more seriously, "millions" of programs?

  220. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

    Now I wasn't writing down the stats when I was watching the movie, but that sounds like a good idea and that's something I'll do when I rent it.

    Here's something else to ask yourself. If Moore is just a honest man in search of the truth, why does he feel the need to make anyone look like a baffoon in his movies? Your answer may be "he doesn't, he's just showing what they themselves say". But you know that's a cop-out. You can make anyone look like an idiot depending on how you cut the film. Moore obviously knew that his subject was going to look like an idiot, and that the subject obviously wasn't intending that. Why not take some extra time to give the subject a chance to fill out his argument?

    Then there was this quote from another IMDB poster...

    I agree with some of the flaws critics have noted...sometimes Moore does target the wrong people (e.g., going after Dick Clark because a woman who worked at one of his theme restaurants for minimum wage is a mother of a little boy that accidentally shot and killed a classmate).

    So why go after Dick Clark? Because he gave Moore some juicy film to use?

    The thing about Moore is that he obviously has some talent for invoking emotion (obviously), and raising questions. If only he would use that talent for good instead of evil.

    But then he probably wouldn't make as much money, or get as many accolades from the Hollywood left.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  221. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

    Ok, So I guess the whole comparison thing is out now.

    Look it, Moore is not perfect. I can understand people not agreeing with everything the guy has to say.

    The truth hurts. When you put the truth so blatently in someones face and they pethiticaly devert the truth by repeating something unrelated just to save face isn't Moore's fault. I'm personaly glad this guy is out there doing what he's doing. NO ONE ELSE IS. This man is doing more good and cares deeply about this country then most people. With the Dick Clark senario he simply pointing out how things relate, and how one thing can effect so many (ripples in a pond). That person you quoted left out something very important that was a major factor in that senario and the only way your going to know is to watch the damn movie for yourself. I'd rather form my own opinions of the movie than to constantly rely on what other people have to say. So watch it already.

  222. Voting booths are their own punishment by Timex · · Score: 1
    (if were dumb enough to be led by tv adds (ie not watch the debates), and to never consider a 3rd party we are getting what we deserve, it is not the fault of our government.

    I have this theory about voting booths... My theory is that there's something akin to a magic spell over them that causes everyone that steps into one to temporarily lose every IQ point they have in their skull. It's because of this sort of thing that Clinton got elected a second time and that Bush is where he is today. It's why Democrats tend to take Massachusetts by storm, unless the Republican makes himself look so much like a Democrat it makes one want to cry.

    I've voted in every election since I was 18, save one, and at that time I was overseas in the Navy. My theory applies to me as much as anyone... That's why I have my decisions written down before I set foot in the booth. It saves embarrassment later. (I voted for WHO?!?)

    If "con" is the opposite of "pro", what is the opposite of Congress?

    --
    When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
  223. Got you beat with a slower machine. by Linuxathome · · Score: 2

    Put linux in that box and you can do more! I have an even slower machine--intel pentium 200 Mhz processor (not pentium II, III, or 4) without MMX. I'm currently running linux mandrake 8.2, with openoffice installed. I didn't mean to get in a pissing match, but just wanted to actually try to present to you an alternative to get that "new box" feeling. I'm a grad student myself, and this box supplies me with just about all the tools I need to do my work--latex to write my dissertation, opencalc for spreadsheet work, xfig for vector graphics and figures--and it gets uptimes of over 30 days.

  224. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    I saw him on shows promoting Roger and Me and later as a commentator on a few cable shows and I've read a few written pieces by him on the internet. He's a buffoon.

    If you're a fan, sorry to hear that but that won't change my own opinion based on my personal experience of the man.

  225. Re: Puerto Rico by Abreu · · Score: 2

    The situation in Puerto Rico would be unacceptable for someone of the libertarian persuation, but would you rather live in Puerto Rico, essentially living in a colony, or live in an independent country like the Dominican Republic or Haiti?

    There's a saying here in Mexico that has some parallel to Puerto Rico: "It is better to be the lion's tail than the mouse's head"

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  226. Re: Puerto Rico by stanmann · · Score: 1

    Doesn't matter what I want, In this scenario, it matters what the puerto ricans want. And personally, I'd pick Puerto Rico over Haiti. Don't know enough about the Dominican to make an educated choice.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  227. Re:I am pleased with the Lindows aspect... by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    Actually if you compare the US to Switzerland the US has fewer arms and a higher murder rate. And Switzerland is very much an apt comparison because it's a multicultural society (french, italian, and german) just like the US. Of course nobody is quite as multicultural as we are (we have significant populations from all over) but Switzerland is the best comparison to control for the effects of different cultures rubbing each other the wrong way.

    So, Did Bowling for Columbine explain the Swiss higher arms, lower murder rate story? I didn't think so. That would be too honest for Michael Moore. A buffoon, once again.

  228. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Alex Buell:
    Or how about a Penguin logo painted in really really trippy
    colours, and emblazoned with the word LSD. :o)

    Geert Uytterhoeven:
    We already had that one, but unfortunately Russell King fixed that nasty
    palette bug in drivers/video/fbcon.c :-)
    -- linux-kernel

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...