Slashdot Mirror


What Would You Do With a 92 TBps Router?

enodev writes "Cisco announces today it's new 'Carrier routing system' For a price tag starting at $450,000 it's able to route up to 92 Tbps. It also features IOS-XR and the first optical OC-768c/STM-256c optical Interface." update changed TBps to Tbps and suddenly things seemed less cool ;)

344 comments

  1. I know exactly what I'd do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I begins with 'p' and ends with 'r0n'.

    1. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by savagedome · · Score: 5, Funny

      ends with 'r0n'

      Not to be picky but it starts with r0n and ends with Jeremy :D

      *ducks*

    2. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by baudilus · · Score: 2, Funny

      We assume the following is true:

      nerds : bandwidth :: crackheads : crack

      Now we assume that I have the kind of bandwidth that makes this router useful. And we all know what crackheads will do for crack...

      </sarcasm>

    3. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be pretty fun to use it for pissing off RIAA big time too.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by swordboy · · Score: 1

      It is no coincidence that Cisco's own naming convention is HFR. I think that we all know what HFR means.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    5. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Research about positrons?

    6. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by Vihai · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what I'd do: Debugging IOS-XR all day long...

    7. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know what I'd do: Sell it on eBay.

      WTF else am I going to do with it? Use it as a doorstop?

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    8. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Funny

      well if you want to download 92 TBps of gigantic schlong then go right ahead

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    9. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by Rick.C · · Score: 2, Funny
      Forget the "Information Superhighway".

      I'd connect the output to the input and invent the "Information Cyclotron"!!

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    10. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I'd think becoming a web host would be far more lucrative since you've already got the freakin expensive router you can start off with a T3 or a couple of T3s depending on your credit. Can move up from there, in a few years you might be using the full capacity of the router! Course I spose that depends on how well you can manage a shit load of server.

    11. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now we assume that I have the kind of bandwidth that makes this router useful. And we all know what crackheads will do for crack...

      If I ever see a guy on a street corner with a sign that says "will suck dick for bandwidth", then I'm quitting the computing profession.

    12. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by shine · · Score: 0

      Seems like it start with pr0n and ends up with AIDS.

      ~S

    13. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by Gallowsgod · · Score: 2, Funny

      I begins with 'p' and ends with 'r0n'.

      That's right, aim low. Personally, I'd go to some bar where geek girls hang out and ask if any of them would want to go back to my place and see my 92TBps router.

      --

      The belief in a biblical god is an ignorant one
    14. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by shannara256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Not to be picky but it starts with r0n and ends with Jeremy

      Picky or pricky?

    15. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by monkeydo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The smallest interface you can get on these is an OC-48. That's approx. 48 T3's.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    16. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that Cisco takes food stamps as a form of payment.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    17. Re:I know exactly what I'd do by E_elven · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm afraid I have some bad news for you..

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
  2. More info.... by Mz6 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Well, I was going to comment and see what, if anything, Juniper Networks was going to come out with but I found a NYTimes article to answer it otherwise. Here's a snippet:

    "Juniper Networks has individual routers that are at least as fast, but the company cannot combine as many routers to ultimately produce the same speeds, according to Chris Nicoll, a telecommunications industry analyst with Current Analysis, a research firm."

    and more....

    "The new router design is the first developed by Cisco that allows several routers to be connected, according to the company. A single router would be able to transmit data at 1.2 terabits a second. But as many as 72 routers can be hooked together to send data at 92 terabits a second, far faster than any router sold now. In telecommunications, data transfer is usually measured in bits per second. A terabit is one trillion bits. "

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. re: more info.... by ed.han · · Score: 1

      so who are the early adopters besides ISPs, governments and financial services? are there any?

      ed

    2. Re:More info.... by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 5, Funny
      "The new router design is the first developed by Cisco that allows several routers to be connected, according to the company. A single router would be able to transmit data at 1.2 terabits a second. But as many as 72 routers can be hooked together to send data at 92 terabits a second, far faster than any router sold now."

      I have this weird image of a pile 72 routers being daisy-chained serially, with the insanely grinning salesman standing next to it saying "Look! If you connect them to each other they go twice as fast! It goes up to 11!"

      Now that gold-plated high-speed modem cable will finally come in handy!

    3. Re:More info.... by mousehouse · · Score: 1

      actually i heard that Juniper themselves are also working on this 'model' to scale the performance by bundling M320's (ehhh, i think that was the typedef) together to ... etc etc etc i wonder if there's a short-term market for this. over here in Europe all but some of the T1 carriers have died, and the ones living are not investing that heavily. would like to config one of these beasts though! just one! ahhhhhhh.... pleeeeeeeeeeeeaaase?

    4. Re:More info.... by Robert+Hayden · · Score: 1

      Avici terrabit routers have been "combinable" for several years.

      Expensive, yes. tiny market share, yes. But they have been combinable.

      And if this new router "works" as well as their other routers, we're doomed.

    5. Re:More info.... by Tristandh · · Score: 1

      lol...
      I'd mod you up for the Spinal Tap reference, but hey, it is alreadt +5, Funny

    6. Re:More info.... by CoffeeCrusader · · Score: 1

      Insanely grinning salesman? Well, a pile of 72 routers at 450000 each will make that li'l pile of more than 30million bucks in bandwith. calculating... that makes about 3.375 million $per Tbps. That's actually a pretty fair price...

  3. I would... by cassidyc · · Score: 0, Redundant

    leech pr0n

    1. Re:I would... by Rosyna · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, is there any other thing to do with that much bandwidth? You could get porn at such high resolution you can see the ingrown hairs on the porn "actress'" butt.

      "My bunghole itches. Is it because I am a girl?"

    2. Re:I would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      download the internet

    3. Re:I would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ingrown hairs on the porn "actress'" butt

      Thanks for this image in my head now. This is going to take some serious alcohol to flush out of my head. And its only Tuesday. Baaahhaaaa.

  4. what would I do? by mrhandstand · · Score: 5, Funny

    Route traffic.

    --
    Always value the individual over the system. --Bruce Lee "I don't need a Sig - I have a custom 191" - me
    1. Re:what would I do? by Trigun · · Score: 1

      A student of Occham, I see.

      Brilliant!

    2. Re:what would I do? by Sardak · · Score: 1
      What Would You Do With a 92 TBps Router?

      I'd wish I had hardware that could utilize 92 TBps of bandwidth.

    3. Re:what would I do? by SnowDeath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Finally be able to play a 16 player lan game of quake AND any other game without the other game suffering...

    4. Re:what would I do? by Democritus2 · · Score: 0
      --

      no god is good

    5. Re:What would I do? by kunudo · · Score: 1

      A 100Mbits router is sufficient for me, I could make a lot more use of 450,000 bucks.

      But with $450,000 you'd soon end up buying stuff that could use such a nice little router. And then what? Save up and buy a 92Tbps router..?

    6. Re:what would I do? by dickiedoodles · · Score: 2, Funny

      At $450,000 I'd sell it

      --
      In Soviet Russia Slashdot cliches use you
    7. Re:what would I do? by ScottGant · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a Linux machine and a WinXP machine that my wife uses. I'd probably use it to link them up. It would probably be faster than my Linksys router I'm using now.

      It could probably even take another computer on it too...but I wouldn't want to push it.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    8. Re:what would I do? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure that at that speed the space-time continuium breaks down and we get some sort of quantum-hop thing going.

    9. Re:what would I do? by kalgen · · Score: 1
      Finally be able to play a 16 player lan game of quake AND any other game without the other game suffering...

      Call it a 16 player LAN game of Doom2 and you'd sadly be more "interesting" than "funny"...

    10. Re:what would I do? by Trigun · · Score: 1

      I did a Google on the name and came up with both spellings. 50/50 chance, and I blew it.

    11. Re:what would I do? by mwood · · Score: 1

      Did it find Ockham as well? :-}

    12. Re:what would I do? by mwood · · Score: 1

      Why am I thinking of the urban legend about the guy who acquired a JATO motor and thought it would be cool to strap it onto his car and go really, really fast?

      I have trouble figuring out what I could do with 54mb/s wireless that isn't already overkilled at 11mb/s. What would I do with 92tb/s? Build a modest telephone exchange I guess.

    13. Re:what would I do? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Finally be able to play a 16 player lan game of quake AND any other game without the other game suffering... "

      I've got a 100 megabit switch I'll sell ya for a much cheaper 100 grand.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:what would I do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the rule dictate it's own spelling. "Occam", by requiring one fewer keystroke, clearly is the simpler and thusly, correct, spelling.

    15. Re:what would I do? by sharkey · · Score: 1
      What would I do with 92tb/s?

      Have bandwidth left over after dealing with all the SMB crap your WinXP PC pumps out?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    16. Re:what would I do? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1



      He better be careful with that razor - those robot arms look pretty twitchy.

      "Look out, Mary Jane! He's got a Gillette Mach 4 and he's about to cut off your dres... erm, never mind!"

    17. Re:what would I do? by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      okum has one more less and can be typed with the left hand only.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    18. Re:what would I do? by Throtex · · Score: 1

      Okum typed with the right hand would be even simpler.

    19. Re:what would I do? by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      !aixelsid nmaD

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
  5. Various uses by chendo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Horny bastard: Porn. Lots of porn.

    Script kiddie: OMG I CAN DOS PPL!!!!!!!111111111oneone

    Pirate: Warez, and other assorted treasures.

    CowboyNeal: Hey, we can use it to host slashdot!

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
    1. Re:Various uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your routine needs work. I give it a D. You can do better Alan. See me after class.

  6. I would be very, very pissed... by jbarr · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...because my home network equipment only has 100Mbps adapters, and I can't afford to upgrade them all.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:I would be very, very pissed... by lullabud · · Score: 1

      Can't afford new network cards?? That's for sure, especially after dishing out half a million dollars for a router!

  7. I would by Achoi77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sell it for $450,000. Then get a house.

    1. Re:I would by baudilus · · Score: 1

      You'd have to buy it for $450,000 first. Cut out the middleman and buy the house now.

    2. Re:I would by NeoFunk · · Score: 1

      No.

    3. Re:I would by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      thats probably the worst use of the cliche i've ever seen, you should be ashamed of yourself.

      In soviet russia, you could get a cheap knock off for 20 bux. Something like the C-C-C-Carrier R-R-R-Routing S-S-S-System. I'm sure you can find that on ebay.

    4. Re: I would by Jeffmlr · · Score: 1

      From the MSN article:

      "The router, which will cost between $250,000 and $2 million or more per unit when it goes on sale in July"
      So if you had the full multishelf version you'd probably be getting more than $450,000. Although in the Bay Area that'd still only buy you one house.

      Another interesting tid-bit from the MSN article, given the usually long cycle from announcement to production usage by clients:

      "Sprint, which uses only Cisco routers on its network, spends tens of millions of dollars a year on networking gear. It has been testing the CRS-1 router for two years and expects to have it carrying live traffic within the next several weeks, Valente said."
    5. Re:I would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could sell that house and buy 2000 teepees :)

    6. Re:I would by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      Or... start a hosting company, raise about fifty times that amount, THEN get a house. That's what I would do at least...

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  8. I know what I'm gonna do by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hang it off the back of my 56k modem, what do you think I'm gonna do with it? Sheesh!

  9. What Would You Do With a 92 TBps Router? by perrinkog · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What Would You Do With a 92 TBps Router?"

    Pinky : "Gee, Brain what do you want to do tonight?"
    Brain : "The same thing we do every night Pinky. Try to take over the world!"

    --
    (Karma = auto -1)
    1. Re:What Would You Do With a 92 TBps Router? by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

      Now, how do you put a router in orit?

    2. Re:What Would You Do With a 92 TBps Router? by kemapa · · Score: 1

      Throw it, naturally.

    3. Re:What Would You Do With a 92 TBps Router? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about those stupid IP phones.

      Phase 1: introduce phones that hog virtually
      all available LAN bandwidth
      Phase 2: sell all new routers and switches to
      accomodate the 5x traffic generated by
      voice traffic
      Phase 3: Profit!
      Phase 4: end-of-life the current generation of
      IP phones
      Phase 5: sell customers all-new phones (again)
      to work with the next Callmanager, or
      "standard" in-line power (instead of
      cisco's proprietary power)
      Phase 6: MORE profit!
      Phase 7: repeat steps 4 thru 6 every 3 years,
      continuting to state how much cheaper
      it is to replace everything every 3
      years vs. a standard PBX
      Phase 8: GONZO profit!

  10. But... by dioscaido · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... does the router have DRM?

    1. Re:But... by CaptnMArk · · Score: 4, Funny

      TCP/IP over OpenGL over DRM?

    2. Re:But... by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

      ...over carrier pigeon

    3. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would imagine it does:

      http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk583/tk 79 9/tech_design_guides_list.html

  11. that could by cassidyc · · Score: 3, Funny

    pump out a lot of spam...

    Failing that with enough filespace it could server an awful lot of mp3/ogg/aac

    CJC

    1. Re:that could by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 3, Funny

      pump out a lot of spam...

      from that Windows-based supercomputer...

    2. Re:that could by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Funny
      pump out a lot of spam...
      And someone modded this "Interesting". I think you've given someone an idea. May God save our inboxes...
    3. Re:that could by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Even God can't handle 92Tbps

    4. Re:that could by stienman · · Score: 1

      HEY!

      It's called Targetted Advertising, bub, and I'd modify IOS to add a tagline advertisement to each and every email and web page. Probably add a comment to zip files whizzing past, add my own copyright (or the GPL) to source code files... Hey, who needs a level 3 router when you can route at level 7 baby! Now we're cookin' with gas!

      -Adam

    5. Re:that could by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny

      She can, but not full-duplex.

  12. What would I do? by shird · · Score: 0, Redundant

    At $450,000? I would sell it of course.

    A 100Mbits router is sufficient for me, I could make a lot more use of 450,000 bucks.

    --
    I.O.U One Sig.
  13. Not IOS though by sphealey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interestingly however it does not use IOS. Which brings up several questions: is Cisco going to start replacing IOS with redesigned-from-scratch (watch out for second system effect!)? Or will they maintain two routing software bases, IOS and whatever the new one is called? Will this be an issue from either a marketing or technical/CCIE perspective?

    sPh

    1. Re: Not IOS though by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did you bother to even look at the site? Nooo of course not. From the site:

      The Cisco CRS-1 is powered by Cisco IOS XR Software, a unique self-healing and self-defending operating system designed for always-on operation while scaling system capacity up to 92 Tbps.

      Click on "Cisco IOS XR" and you get:

      Q. What is Cisco IOS XR Software?

      A. Cisco IOS XR Software is the newest member of the Cisco IOS Software Family. Cisco IOS XR has been developed to address the requirements for scale, availability, and service flexibility which arise from the creation of converged packet infrastructures that consolidate voice, video, and data services. Cisco IOS XR Software has been specifically optimized to take advantage of the massively distributed processing capabilities of the Cisco CRS-1 Carrier Routing System.


      Why do you even bother posting? I wouldn't think it's for karma whoring - such a low UID isn't likely to partake in such things unless adicted. It certainly isn't to contribute quality material to the discussion, either.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re: Not IOS though by vangilder · · Score: 2, Informative

      An article in the Wall Street Journal yesterday [wsj.com] mentioned that they were getting rid of IOS in favor of something more "user-friendly." Their big competition is Juniper and, in order to sell more boxen (routen?) they have had to answer to complaints about IOS. Also, the article mentioned that IOS wass getting to be around 15e6 lines of code, and was impossible to maintain. Yay for a free market where consumers can actually vote with thier wallet and compaines have to respond or someone else will.

    3. Re: Not IOS though by Mateito · · Score: 2, Informative

      What do you mean "Not IOS"?

      All your questions are answered here:

      http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5763/produ ct s_qanda_item09186a008022e09b.shtml

    4. Re: Not IOS though by sphealey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not sure I understand your complaint. I read the article in the Wall Street Journal on Monday, and also several web articles Monday night and Tuesday morning.

      Given that I had already read Cisco's press releases (which perhaps I should have specified), none of the material you quoted answers any of the questions I posed. I am interested in the community's answers, not Cisco's spin.

      sPh

    5. Re: Not IOS though by sphealey · · Score: 1

      See previous response. For a long time Cisco was one of the most honest suppliers in the IT world, but even honest companies use spin control today. I am interested in discussion by knowledgable third parties, not the inital spin.

      sPh

    6. Re: Not IOS though by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 2, Informative

      IOS isn't suitable for service-provider products. A few years ago when I worked for Cisco they were just starting this project and were also starting to architect a new OS. Believe it or not they intended to call it CHAOS; Cisco High-Availabilty Operating System. Shoe phones not included.

    7. Re: Not IOS though by sphealey · · Score: 2, Informative
      You know those crazy guys at the Wall Street Journal news division, always getting things wrong:
      Cisco is taking a gamble with its counterattack, scrapping the software included in nearly every Cisco product since the company was founded two decades ago in favor of a new operating system designed to make the router easier to maintain and manage. "This is probably Cisco's most important" new product for telecom carriers, says Gabriel Lowy, an analyst for Blaylock & Partners LP. "The core router company wants to remain the core router company."

      Wall Street Journal, Midwest Edition, May 24, 2004.

      (subscription only so you will have to dig a paper copy out of the trash). There is other interesting discussion in the article as well.

      With that settled, could we get back to discussing the questions I posed? I am still interested in what router and technology buying dudes have to say.

      sPh

    8. Re: Not IOS though by ivlad · · Score: 0

      I think, it will be at least IOS-compatible from the point of view of CLI. The amount of people experienced with IOS CLI is quite big and I don't think, Cisco will/can affort selling incompatible OS.

      New OS internals seem to be pretty different. At least they finally managed to have memory protection (in "normal" IOS all processes/threads share the same memory). This should make some sence for http server for example, where performance is not a problem.

    9. Re: Not IOS though by Mateito · · Score: 1

      I'd be very very suprised if they "got rid" of IOS. Cisco are already (and have for a long time) provided web-front ends for routers and switches (even thought the router one is primitive to say the least). There is also the configmaker tool to help ..um.. make configs :)

      The deal is: routing is complicated. Even your basic IP router IOS image has thousands of configuration posibilities. How simple can you make restributing routes between two routing protocols between half a dozen subnets while controlling the load to your specifications over your leased lines?

      And then there's BGP. Fun.

      IOS isn't that hard. There's a learning curve, sure. But hell... if you've ever looked at the instructions to change an IP on an interface in IOS compared to, for example, windows, its a nightmare.

      Prettier does not necesarily mean "user-friendly"... especially when a "user" shouldn't be let within a hundred miles of a config-if prompt.

      IOS might not be simple, but its an efficient way to control the power of the router.

      Disclaimer: I have zero Jupiter experience, so I can't compare them.

    10. Re: Not IOS though by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Give me a link.

      I can't find anything that states that IOS XP _isn't_ IOS. Maybe there's a command reference somewhere?

    11. Re: Not IOS though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      I believe IOS XR is what was called internally ENA. This was an attempt to rewrite IOS from scratch - IOS was aparently very hard to make robust and to maintain, essentially operting in a single memory space. ENA was rumoured to a multi-process architecture running on QNX. But re-writing IOS is a really hard task, and Cisco seem to have lost faith in ENA at some point, reducing the platforms supported to only be the HFR.

      They took another track with the rest of their product line, which was to slowly migrate from the original IOS monolith to a multi-process architecture, without a complete re-write.

      But my information is out of date, so the situation may have changed somewhat.

    12. Re: Not IOS though by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

      Service providers (ATT, etc) don't look for IOS CLI comptibility. They have existing craft interfaces that they are comfortable with and expect in every product. If it doesn't behave the way they expect it to they will demand that it be changed. It's important to them to have everything behave the same regardless of the vendor.

    13. Re: Not IOS though by straybullets · · Score: 1

      I know what is Cisco IOS XR , i read the source just the other day ... :]-

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    14. Re: Not IOS though by Feyr · · Score: 1

      the problem with cisco's web interface, from my own experience, is it doesn't work.

      it look like it do, but it utterly doesn't do shit. (tried on a PIX). in the end i just typed the command manually (i wore out my ? key too)

    15. Re: Not IOS though by mwood · · Score: 1

      What he said. IOS is too nice to give up on. It's powerful and doesn't get in my way. I spent a few hours wrapping my head around the way ACLs work, but now I'm set because they all work the same way.

      Forget "simple"; I'll take expressive power anyday.

    16. Re: Not IOS though by mwood · · Score: 1

      CHAOS? Really? Wouldn't MIT sue?

      Maybe you're thinking of KAOS, CONTROL's opposite number.

    17. Re: Not IOS though by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      Q. What is Cisco IOS XR Software?

      IOS eXtremely Rootable

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    18. Re: Not IOS though by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a redesigned backend but they have redesigned the backend before most recently for the GSR's (the 12k line) I was implemeting them when they first shipped and while the front end is the same the bad end was rather different. This is nothing new for Cisco everything is pretty much C modules that get compiled for the new artitecture and/or written for the new hardware. It's realy not that hard to replace a software bit with hardware by just writting a wrapper module.

      A side note read the specs for the OC768 Module it is clear channel only no sub interfaces this beast is realy only for interconnecting these things at 40gbps thats a lot of bandwith on one pipe.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    19. Re: Not IOS though by sphealey · · Score: 1

      > the problem with cisco's web interface, from my
      > own experience, is it doesn't work.

      IIRC I have tried four different Cisco GUIs over the last 12 years (mainly so I could turn over maintenance to less-experienced members of my team). In all cases I finally gave up and went back to the CLI. Sounds similar to your experience.

      sPh

    20. Re: Not IOS though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you mean privilege-level-15-able

    21. Re: Not IOS though by Necr0maN · · Score: 1

      Second that, it doesn't work like it should on the aironet gear too (some settings just don't get applied etc), and the CMS (on catalysts) is just ridiculous, and puts an end to all its functionality as soon as you start using clustering.

      But Cisco itself proclaims that the web interfaces are still in a testing phase, and that you are still supposed to use the command line, which off course works flawless as ever (...).
      Fine for me, I got to like the IOS CLI.

    22. Re: Not IOS though by Plammox · · Score: 1

      If the cost for a 'true' 40 Gbps optical system is $450k, OC768 won't take off anytime soon.

      Back in 2000 everybody threw truckloads of money into 40Gbps optical link research, and see how far we have gotten.

      I don't think the world is ready for 40 Gbps, and they won't be for the next 5 years at least.

      A standard 10 Gbps optical link is still an incredibly fat pipe, even by today's telecom/enterprise standards.

  14. hrm... by morgajel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make a CD Case?

    actually, I just hook it up in my apartment and not tell anyone- then the next lan party I host not get complaints that my network is too slow.
    (bastards.)

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
  15. [AC]What I would do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Route all the 'shock sites' through it, goatse, tubgirl, trollse, you name it.

    I'm not sure if I would have to get another router though, they generate a lot of traffic already.

    1. Re:[AC]What I would do. by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      This convinced me we do have a need for a space based freakin' laser cannon.

  16. Damn YOU! by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 1, Funny

    My cable modem choked on just downloading those specs (and that pricetag)!!! O_o

    Now it's huddled in the corner crying about "too much pressure to perform" or some such crap! Thanks a lot you insensitive clod!

  17. STM256! by REBloomfield · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "It also features IOS-XR and the first optical OC-768c/STM-256c optical Interface."

    I'm studying Optical transmissions at the moment, and just getting my head around how bytes were interleaved and mapped across AU's, TUG's etc in *one* STM was a stretch enough, (the diagrams are nuts), and now there's an STM2565! That's a bloody lot of multiplexing....

    Bet they're glad they don't use PDH anymore....

    1. Re:STM256! by vyzar · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can be sure it will actually be STM-256c as opposed to plain vanilla STM-256.

      Almost NO datacomms equipment manufacturers support the non-concatenated versions of SDH above STM-1. I have bitten in the past by companies that said they support STM-4 when they actually meant STM-4c. And of course at the time the telcos only support STM-4 and NOT STM-4c.

      I suspect that the STM-256 support will be the same.

      (For the uninitiated STM-4 is a straight multiplexing of 4 STM-1s, each with their own header and payload sections. STM-4c is essentially one big STM channel with a single header section and a single concatenated payload section. STM-256c just extends this principle to more insane capacities).

    2. Re:STM256! by REBloomfield · · Score: 1
      Thanks for this. Is this the same as virtual concatenation, as that's coming up at the end of my book? :)

      Thanks again, that's really helpful.

    3. Re:STM256! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, don't. You're bringing back memories of the SDH course I took a few years ago. Thank God I never had to put it to any practical use, I don't think I could have stood it..

    4. Re:STM256! by phulshof · · Score: 1

      Ermm... I've been working in the telcom industry for about 6.5 years now, but I've never heard of an STM-4C. What you call an STM-4C is a standard STM-4, and your STM-4 definition is a special interface some telcom companies might be willing to provide for you.

      Within a standard STM-4 however, it is possible to place an AU4-4C concatenated payload. This payload contains only one set of Path OverHead bytes i.s.o. 4.

    5. Re:STM256! by phulshof · · Score: 1

      Actually, the previous information is incorrect. There's no such thing as an STM-4C.

      An STM-4 consists of 4 multiplexed STM-1s with 1 set of Section OverHead bytes (so 1xB1, 1xD1-D3, 1xK1/K2, etc.).

      A VC4-4C contains the capacity of 4 VC4s, with 1 set of Path OverHead bytes.

      A VC4-4v (virtual concatenation) are basically 4 separate VC4s with some extra information in the H4 byte to allow the receiving end to put them in the correct order and time (since the VC4s may be transmitted through different paths, they may not arrive at the receiving end at the same time) so the payload in those 4 VC4s can be used as one set of payload.

      If you want to ask questions on SONET/SDH, feel free to email me at phulshof@xs4all.nl. I've been designing/verifying SONET/SDH ASICs for about 6.5 years now, so I should be able to answer any question you got on the topic. :)

  18. Beowulf Cluster by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

    I mean, really, is there any other obvious choice on slashdot, besides pr0n of course?

    --
    Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
  19. Careful by choas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now you guys please be careful not to /. Cisco :)

    --
    I will work to elevate you, just enough to bring you down
    1. Re:Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Cisco is using Carp to provide failover ;)

    2. Re:Careful by zoeblade · · Score: 1

      Now you guys please be careful not to /. Cisco :)

      As opposed to NetGear, who slashdot other people...

    3. Re:Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late....try loading their "product tour" (Flash warning): Flash presentation

  20. After Much Deliberation.... by bfg9000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... I'd sell it and buy an Aston Martin. I'm not THAT much of a geek -- big routers just don't attract the babes the way I'd like.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    1. Re:After Much Deliberation.... by prescot6 · · Score: 1, Funny

      big routers just don't attract the babes the way I'd like.

      You must be using them wrong.

    2. Re:After Much Deliberation.... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, each time I see some guy driving one those cars I can't help feeling sorry for him for the size of his "router".

    3. Re:After Much Deliberation.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or doesn't have a "big router"

    4. Re:After Much Deliberation.... by transient · · Score: 1

      Aston Martin? No way man, for that kind of money, whatever I'm buying better have a pair of wings!

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    5. Re:After Much Deliberation.... by stienman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Way to give the ladies a headache, dude...

      "Oooh, Aston Martin! Argh! Geek! But it is an Astin Martin... but that geek! Ugh... I wonder if I can unbundle this comingled product - Where's an antitrust lawyer when you need one?"

      -Adam

    6. Re:After Much Deliberation.... by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Quite right, it's not the bandwith, but how you use it.

    7. Re:After Much Deliberation.... by nlh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Blasphemy! I mean, you couldn't possible be implying that Aston Martin's have phallic symbolism....who on earth would ever think that....

      Vanquish

      It's people like you that probably think that Joe Camel had some sort of symbolism too!

      Just a Camel

      ;)

  21. Handle a slashdot effect? by Sadiq · · Score: 0

    Handle a slashdot effect to your product information pages?

    Or not...

    --
    SysWear - Geek T-shirts (UK/Europe)
  22. The Answer is Obvious... by Kittoa · · Score: 1

    Denial of Service attack on the entire internet. ;)

    -Alex

  23. host.... by cassidyc · · Score: 1

    the worlds biggest game of counterstrike. All those players on one server, teamkilling and camping like nothing on earth.

    doesn`t it sound great

    CJC

  24. What Would I Do with a 92 TBps Router? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    I I wasn't looking for a faster NIC, higher-quality cabling, a new ISP, and probably an all new place to live just to use the damn thing, I'd probably be looking for a way to sell it discreetly and anonymously -- because I'm certain I lack the means to acquire one legally.

  25. The same thing we do with every router, Pinky... by mog · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Try to take over the world!

  26. What would I do.... by wpiman · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why- I would heat my house with it of course. Anyone have any numbers on the power consumption of this beast?

    1. Re:What would I do.... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      It's power consumption isn't that high. It's only 1 StaNPO (Standard nuclear powerplant output).

    2. Re:What would I do.... by will_die · · Score: 1

      Maximum AC = 16.56KW@56,520 BTU/Hr

      A decent direct vent fireplace will put out around 15K BTU.
      So if you have it anywhere near your computer plan to surf naked.

    3. Re:What would I do.... by mog007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      anywhere near your computer plan to surf naked.

      Considering the amount of porn you could amass with this thing, I'd say it's a pretty likely bet that the user WOULD be naked. Clothing just gets in the way.

  27. Terabits, not terabytes by jfengel · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a small point, but the article calls it 92 Tbps, not 92 TBps. Which means its really 19 terabytes per second, which works out to some ungodly number of libraries of congress per fortnight. Either way, it's a lot.

    1. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by prescot6 · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...the article calls it 92 Tbps, not 92 TBps. Which means its really 19 terabytes per second.

      Psh.. only 19 terabytes? I _was_ excited, but now...

      :)
    2. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by crashnbur · · Score: 2, Informative

      Last I checked, a byte is 8 bits, so 92 TB would actually be 11.5 Tb.

    3. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...which works out to some ungodly number of libraries of congress per fortnight.

      Ok, I always get this confused. Is a "Library of Congress" a unit of weight, volume, or information?

    4. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by kalgen · · Score: 1
      It's a small point, but the article calls it 92 Tbps, not 92 TBps. Which means its really 19 terabytes per second, which works out to some ungodly number of libraries of congress per fortnight. Either way, it's a lot.

      92 Tbps (terabits per second) = 11.5 TBps (terabytes per second), not 19. Either way, it's a lot.

    5. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by morie · · Score: 1

      Is a "Library of Congress" a unit of weight, volume, or information Indeed it is

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    6. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by jfengel · · Score: 1

      And in other news, computer science majors suck at basic arithmetic.

      Thanks for the catch.

    7. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, so if we approximate the size of the Library of Congress to be around 10TB, we can route 1.15 LoC/s, for a whopping total of...

      1,391,040 Libraries of Congress per fortnight!

    8. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm.....

      8 bits = 1 byte

      or...

      1 bit = .125 bytes

      either way you look at it, 92 bits DOES NOT EQUAL 19 bytes.

      Try this on for size: http://www.speedguide.net/conversion.php

      Informative my ass.

    9. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by underworld · · Score: 1

      How do you figure 19 terabytes?

      There are 8 bits in a byte.
      There are 1024 bits in a kilobit.
      There are 1048576 bits in a megabit.
      There are 1073741824 bits in a gigabit.
      There are 1099511627776 bits in a terabit.
      There are 101155069755392 bits in 92 terabits.

      There is 1 byte in 8 bits.
      There is 1 kilobyte in 8192 bits.
      There is 1 megabyte in 8388608 bits.
      There is 1 gigabyte in 8589934592 bits.
      There is 1 terabyte in 8796093022208 bits.
      There are 11.5 terabytes in 101155069755392 bits.
      There are 11.5 terabytes in 92 terabits.

    10. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Which means its really 19 terabytes per second, which works out to some ungodly number of libraries of congress per fortnight.

      But how many Libraries of Congress per parsec is it?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    11. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I figure badly. Arithmetic error. Sorry.

    12. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, that would be,
      19 terabytes ~= 36 petameterlibraries of congress/parsec

      Anything else?

    13. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 2, Informative

      There may or may not be parity, start/stop bits, CRC, or other overhead added to that number. It could mean that it does 92Tbps before the overhead, or after.

      Yes, one byte is 8 bits, but there is usually a lot of variance in that number when you talk line speed.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    14. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by BigG+In+Tokyo · · Score: 1

      No, 8bits in a byte, 96 terabits would be 12 terabytes/s (ignoring the PPP overheads etc.) don't feel bad - Cisco themselves make a similar mistake on page 6 of their CRC brochure claiming to have a 40Gbps hard drive for storing software images and dumps. ;)

    15. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      You've got +1 Informative in my mind! :-)

    16. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Assuming 19 TBps is the right number, that's 1.2 million libraries of congress per fortnight. (Actually, more interesting is that it's just about one LOC per second.)

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    17. Re:Terabits, not terabytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TB is terabyte and Tb is terabit.

  28. Obligatory grammar nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cisco announces today it's new 'Carrier routing system'

    It's "its," not "it's!" Sometimes I think the grammar behind this is starting to devolve... or at least I'm having difficulty parsing it now.

    1. Re:Obligatory grammar nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, tell me about it.

      Before I started browsing the web obsessively, I practically never made the its/it's mistake myself. But nowadays, I catch myself at it at least once a week.

      If I start to catch the whole there/their or lose/loose problem, then that's it. I'll quit the internet, cold turkey.

      (Or is that 'turky'?)

    2. Re:Obligatory grammar nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "its" not a big deal.
      so get over it.

    3. Re:Obligatory grammar nazi by commbat · · Score: 1

      Breaking a protocol IS a big deal!

      --
      'Intellectual Properties' are uncontrollable in the wild. To base an economy on them is just stupid.
    4. Re:Obligatory grammar nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that hard to do correctly. So, stop looking stupid.

  29. Get your units right by dsanfte · · Score: 3, Informative

    Terabits/sec (Tbps), not Terabytes/sec (TBps).

    I'm not surprised some moron doesn't know his units, especially when it's mentioned in the article and placed in its proper notation. I'm surprised the EDITORS refuse to change it to be factual.

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    1. Re:Get your units right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm surprised the EDITORS refuse to change it to be factual."

      You must be new here.

  30. Who would need this? by tfbastard · · Score: 1

    Looks like overkill for most uses I can imagine, except perhaps for linking two extremely transfer-happy facilities together.

  31. What I would do.... by michael+path · · Score: 4, Funny

    The first thing I'd do is set it up for use with my Cable Modem connection.

    Immediately, I'd notice it wouldn't work.

    Then I'd call up my technical support for the cable service, and tell them I couldn't connect.

    They would have me unplug the modem from the "PC", shut down my computer, and reboot it. It wouldn't work.

    Then they'd have me cycle the cable modem.

    Then they'd ask me if I had a router. I would say "Yeah, I do bitches! I got me a Cisco 92TBps. Cost me almost a half-mil, but it's sooo cool!"

    Then they'd tell me it was unsupported, to which I'd respond I would wedge that pizza box sideways up their asses.

    THE END

    1. Re:What I would do.... by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Hehe... I've always wanted to find myself in that situation with tech support for my DSL provider, just for the fun of it. (of course my router is a far more meager Cisco 4500, though that makes it small enough and practical to use) Though the service is reliable enough, and they seem to already know about problems when I do have brief outages, so I've never actually spoken with a human at their tech support. Probably a good thing, though.

    2. Re:What I would do.... by darc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the conversation would go more like this:

      You: "Hello?"
      "PLEASE DIAL ONE FOR BUSINESS SUPPORT, TWO FOR..."
      *five*
      You: "Hello?"
      "PLEASE ENTER THE ID NUM..."
      *fivefivefiveonetwoonetwo*
      Them: *thick indian accent* "Hello?"
      You: "What?"
      Them: "Yes, hello." ...
      Them: "Do you have a router?"
      You: "No, I don't want to buy a scooter."
      Them: "No no, a router."
      You: "Oh yes, I have a Cisco 92TBps."
      Them: "What did you say about my mother?"
      You: "I said, I have a Cisco 92tbps router."
      Them: "Why must you say such horrible things about.."
      *click*

      At this point, it's best to give up, and just post a stupid, but popular question to ask slashdot to better show off the router. "I just acquired a Cisco 92TBps router and am trying to set up an ISP in my apartment building using only a thimble of wax and a two by four wood plank with a nail in it. Can someone tell me my legal liabilities for this ISP, and an open source solution to manage the whole thing, as well as an OS replacement for the cisco IOS firmware?"

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
    3. Re:What I would do.... by michael+path · · Score: 1

      God bless Ask Slashdot.

      I've noticed the articles aren't very different from the emails Strong Bad receives.

    4. Re:What I would do.... by C.+E.+Sum · · Score: 1

      Unforunately, I can almost guarantee (as I work for an ISP with some pretty knowledgable clients) that the only kind of people who say things like "I've got a cisco 2600 on my DSL, isn't that cool?" or "I have an E450 running filesharing at my house, isn't that cool?" or "I have over 30 pc networked at home, isn't that cool" are pretty much the biggest losers.

      Now, you can have all those things and be cool. You just have to learn how not not sound like you're trolling for compliments.

      Did I mention that I have a Linux router running Debian on my DSL line?! d00d!

      --
      -- Have you ever imagined a world with no hypothetical situations?
    5. Re:What I would do.... by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Oh, of course. I tend to focus on the actual problem and situation, not the "what box I'm looking at" and "what keys to push" portion.

      Now while I am the type who would have a 2600 or an E450 at home, I wouldn't really be discussing them with ISP tech support, as they have little to do with my DSL line (well, unless I had an ADSL WIC in the 2600, which I'd like to do someday).

  32. I would just go about everything like normal. by Hopelessness · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would pretend there were enough other people out there with high speeds to make this even remotely useful.

  33. IOS XR is QNX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Who says you can't get performance from a microkernel?

    This was the product whose internal development code name was HFR (Huge Fscking Router).

    Sweet!

    p.s.
    Note the other key word "self-healing".

  34. slashdot by kjeldor · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would...
    for the first time ever...
    *gasps*
    attempt to slashdot slashdot.

  35. Volumetric Video feed with collision detection. by stephenisu · · Score: 1

    Well, with all of that bandwidth, I would imagine that volumetric data feeds of realtime sources with collision detection at high rez could be sent uncompressed, both ways.

    This could be quite usefull in the medical field for say, exploratory surgeries. Collision detection could exist 3 dimentionally instead of the current 1D point sensors.

    Nurse Jameson, this is Dr. Peter North calling, is the patient prepped for the 'probe'?

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    1. Re:Volumetric Video feed with collision detection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probe?

      You _have_ seen our goatse friend here?

      This is not the router you're looking for.

    2. Re:Volumetric Video feed with collision detection. by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      If you needed video, why would you add latency with a router?

  36. 72TBps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is quite a lot, I don't think my P2 333MHz would be able to handle it. What are they using for it, a beowulf cluster or a cray supercomputer with subatomic transistors?

  37. What Would You Do With a 92 TBps Router? by kemapa · · Score: 1, Funny

    Compete for the X-Prize with it?

    *ducks*

  38. What Would Wormy Do? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    I'd host a beowulf cluster of Unreal Tournament 2004 servers with 32-player maps.

  39. I'd take the router and... by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

    lease it out to a large company, and actually make some money off it. At the end of the lease, I might actually have enough money to connect my own stuff to it, as well as to live off of.

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  40. Is this right? by medley · · Score: 1

    TBps = TeraBytes per second Tbps = Terabits per second?

  41. streaming by Leadmagnet · · Score: 0

    Lots and Lots of porn

    --
    http://www.leadmagnet.50megs.com
  42. Finding uses... by chuckcolby · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'd probably use it to prop open my door or somethng. Maybe set a coffee pot atop it. The problem with a Tbps router is that you'd need to feed it traffic.

    And why do we need to route this much traffic? Because over 60% of all email is spam. Because unpatched systems are getting trojans, which in turn are contacting their makers.

    --
    We all get along together like tornadoes and trailer parks.
    1. Re:Finding uses... by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      60%? you're using outdated numbers. It was reported a week or two ago at 66%, and I'm sure those numbers were already a few weeks old anyway. I'd guess it's at 70% if not higher.

  43. With a 95% confidence level, by gutterandthestars · · Score: 5, Funny

    90% of posts will be 1.1 standard deviations away from one of the following:

    0. "fist pr0st!!!!!111~"
    1. "92TBps of pr0n!!!"
    2. "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!"
    3. "I for one welcome our OC-768c/STM-256/optical Interface overlords!"
    4. "1. OC-768c 2. STM-256 3. ... 4. PROFIT!!!"
    5. "If IOS is based on unix, does that mean Cisco will have to pay SCO for licenses?"
    6. "I use BNC you insensitive clod!"
    7. "emacs does this

    1. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by Compulawyer · · Score: 1

      Hilarious. You've been reading Slashdot too long. Wish I had some mod points right now.

      --

      Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    2. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by SmileR.se · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      8. "In soviet russia Cisco routes YOU!"

    3. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by mooingyak · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you forgot:

      "All of your routers are belong to us"
      and
      "In Soviet Russia, traffic routes you"

      You nailed the rest of the cliches I can think of though.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    4. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by WhoReallyCares · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      8. In Soviet Russia traffic routes you!

    5. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by Sir-Techlot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another slashdot cliche: "BSD is dying"

      Of course, there is always the slashdot random story generator

      One guy in our office had his default home page set to slashdot. Someone changed it to this page. It took him 10 minutes before he noticed.

    6. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      Actually in other countries Cisco also routes you. Thats why they sell routers.

    7. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget

      All your bits are belong to Cisco!

    8. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IOS XR is not based on Unix.

      IOS XR _is_ QNX.

      And QNX is a 100% proprietary design and 100% proprietary code, but it looks and and smells like POSIX/Unix. So... as far as that goes it's as much based on Unix as Linix is. :-)

      QNX Rocks.

    9. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by idiotfromia · · Score: 1

      What about a petrified router covered in hot grits?

    10. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by froschmann · · Score: 1

      Duke nukem forever would really fly over one of these babies.

    11. Re:With a 95% confidence level, by Wire+Tap · · Score: 1

      Not quite:

      You could also help route all thost hot grits down Natilie Portman's pants, and use your free time to petrify yourself.

      --

      Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains.

  44. Re: Not IOS though ??? IOS XR ?????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IOS XR ? Not IOS? Hmm. The White Paper says...

  45. its a shame by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    Its a shame that no matter how good cisco claim to be juniper is still a better product with a better interface... IOS is cr4p on large installations

    1. Re:its a shame by Octorian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As much as one could say what you just said, Cisco does have an advantage. They have routers for the high-end, the low-end, and the middle-ground, all with consistency of the interface.

      I've seen competitors with good high-end gear, and sometimes good really-low-end gear (SOHO). But the middle ground, where you'd use something like a 2500 series, 4000 series, or the 2600/3600 is where I wonder if there are any competing products.

      Of course there are those all-in-one four-million-feature boxes (firewall, router, spam filtering, load balancing, IDS, etc.), but sometimes people just want a router to throw in a closet somewhere and grok OSPF between buildings on a campus site.

    2. Re:its a shame by corrosiv · · Score: 2, Informative


      It's not running IOS.

    3. Re:its a shame by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      hmm - well, the 2500, 2600 4000 series routers have been end-of-sale for several years, and some of them are end-of-life. The current models from cisco are the 1700, 2600, and 3700. Another vendor is about to take Cisco to the woodshed when they release their new low-end CPE: Cisco hasn't had any real competition in that space for quite a while, and I would expect things to heat up.

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  46. Vast knowledge by marco0009 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would download the Library of Congress...

    and then porn.
    On a more serious note, I would very much like to setup my own "Internet Node". No need for me to pay for sattelite internet any more, the internet comes to me!

    --
    Physics makes the world go 'round.
    1. Re:Vast knowledge by sharkey · · Score: 1
      On a more serious note, I would very much like to setup my own "Internet Node".

      Watch out! Our software indicates that you may be broadcasting your "IP Address"!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  47. Apostrophe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd look up the google hits for the phrase "How to use apostrophe"

  48. I would I would IIIII woooouuulldd by mrnick · · Score: 1

    I would sell it on ebay!

    Nick Powers

    --

    Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
  49. I'd see if CompUSA would install it for free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because if you're spending that much money, you might as well try some fun.

  50. I would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Host the Wikipedia on it.

  51. I know what I would do... by kenthorvath · · Score: 0
    What Would You Do With a 92 TBps Router?

    Sell it for $450,000.

  52. hum.. impress someone? by idsCypher · · Score: 0

    well since i will never have use for it... for those who in the future may have it, use it to impress some girls "hey wanna see my 92 TBps Router?!" :D

  53. Hook it to my analog modem by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What good does the router do with nothing to connect too..

    They dont work in a vacuum.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Hook it to my analog modem by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > They dont work in a vacuum.

      Pneumatic-powered routers, eh? What will those wacky engineers think of next?

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  54. DSL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a damn thing I have DSL at home and the router is just overkill!

  55. How do you test it? by Boyceterous · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How do they go about testing the full capacity for these? Would a customer ever know if was not quite getting full throughput?

    1. Re:How do you test it? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      I think a customer would not buy one of these unless they needed it. That is to say, the people who get them will probably have no trouble generating enough traffic to test it.

    2. Re:How do you test it? by bugnuts · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can just imagine cisco getting a call...

      "Hi, I just bought one of your 92T routers, and a few minutes ago, I only got 101,155,069,755,390 bits through in one of the seconds. Can you send me my two bits please?"

    3. Re:How do you test it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.ixiacom.com

  56. Well, I'd... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 2, Funny


    ...connect up a bunch of those Beowulf Clusters you /.ers are always on about!

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  57. Pidgeons of course by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

    Sell it and buy a lot of pidgeons... think aboot it.. train all of 'eom to carry small hard drives long distance... can maximize capacity transfer at the sake of speed. OF course there may be data loss due to collisions and bad birds.. but if you stripe the data across multiple drievs you can rebuild the data! And thank god that pidgeons aren't migratory like swallows (European AND African!)... otherwise you may haev your network go south on ya! Oh.. weather proofing.. coconuts... wait... that means swallows... oh dammit.. this just won't work!

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
  58. What I would do doesn't matter. Better question: by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    What would Jesus do with a 92 TBps router? Route traffic, of course! Maybe that's what the afterlife uses to route new arrivals to their appropriate final destinations.

    Hmm. If Peter is just a sysadmin....?

  59. Easy... by ThrasherTT · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Sell it for $450,000 and buy something useful, like a house.

    --

    All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    1. Re:Easy... by ThrasherTT · · Score: 1

      I guess I should read the comments before I post... I'll probably get '-1, Redundant' now. How lame is that?

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    2. Re:Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $450,000 wouldn't buy you a house where I live.Not even a one bedroom apartment. Fortunately that kind of money still buys an Aston Martin DB9 and a parking space for it. Could be worse.

  60. Two words by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

    Counter-Strike!!!!!

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    1. Re:Two words by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      YAY! UBER-LOW LAG GAMING!

      P.S. High transfer rate != Low lag.

      YAY! Faster way to download MUSIC!

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  61. I'd... by fizban · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...route all traffic to www.slashdot.org and slash the dot.

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  62. You ain't /.ing nuttin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a ROUTER people... To DoS or /. one needs a fat pipe attached. Move along, nothing to see here...

  63. interesting story (or maybe not) by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had a silly asignment for a class of mine: look up and a router, tell me what it can do, and then compare/contrast the router you picked with one another classmate picked.

    Being the sadistic mothrefucker that I am, I hopped over to cisco's site at about 1am and saw this beast listed "Carrier Router System". I didn't recognize it as a "normal" Cisco offering, and 92Tb/s is really fucking fast. Though, beyond that, I didn't think anything of it. Cisco is just expected to have the fastest stuff out there, right? And to think, were I more up on my Cisco products, I could've submitted this to the front page. (And they could have denied me access, and posted someone else's submission 12 hours later, as tends to be the case around here :P)

    As it sands, those sorry sons-of-bitches in my IT200 networking course are going to hate me. They likely all picked SOHO equipment to compare/contrast and won't know up from down when it comes to comparing/contrasting. "What's 'Tbps' mean?" they'll ask.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:interesting story (or maybe not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're, like, king of the nerds!

    2. Re:interesting story (or maybe not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are truly a dork among dorks.

  64. Looking at Longhorn minimum requirements ... by supergiovane · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... maybe it will be enough for an 8 nodes Windows supercomputer. Obviously, if you want a 16 nodes Windows cluster, you will need a slightly more speedy hardware.

    --
    Signatures are for stupids.
  65. First Person to say.... by acshelp · · Score: 1

    "I'd install Linux on it!" gets shot

  66. Math by Zungert · · Score: 1
    Mr. Volpi of Cisco said a single router unit would cost $450,000 and a typical deployment could cost $40 million to $50 million at the high end.
    Is it just me, or can people not add any more? $450,000 * 72 = $32.4 mill...cables & installments cost $8-18 million? They better be lining the ends with diamonds and pure gold.
  67. Well, I know what I sure *wouldn't* do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and that's share music with it!

  68. Slashdot Marketing by AndersBrownworth · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much Slashdot was paid to run this ad. Doesn't seem they even changed the wording from the 160 x 600 gif ad running elsewhere.

  69. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    Just because he didn't know doesn't make him an idiot... relax dude it's only /.

    Repeat... relax... it's only /.

  70. OSS? by FartingTowels · · Score: 1

    And it is an open source product! So cool!

  71. That means I can spam more?? by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    I bet the spammers are grinning.. large email systems connected to large network gear connected to a few of these.. = spamers wet dreams

  72. Top 10 by darnok · · Score: 5, Funny

    10. Tell all my mates. Note the names of the one or two who don't laugh at me, and remember to send them, and only them, Xmas cards this year

    9. Get a really really fast sniffer, so I can make sure there's no porn traffic going through my router

    8. Write out 92Tb as a decimal number, just because I know it'll look really impressive

    7. Use it to pick up chicks. Revert to old story about being in astronaut training program, as it would be just as successful and slightly less geeky

    6. It's optical, right? See what happens when I cross the beams...

    5. Sleep with it under my bed. Less painful than a vasectomy, and probably just as effective

    4. Paint go-fast stripes on it, put a "Turbo" sticker on it, then track down and razz anyone who spent $450k on the "old, non-turbo version" by mistake

    3. Use it to beat the living daylights out of everyone associated with "Big Brother". I really really hate that show

    2. Advertise it on eBay with a photo, no reserve, and a description of "some sort of computer network thingy"

    1. Buy 2 and see if they'll reproduce in captivity

    1. Re:Top 10 by SillySnake · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to get a V-Tech sticker too :) Oh, and one of those big red 'R' stickers.. Oh! and a NOS sticker too.. For when you need that extra couple Terebits ;-)

    2. Re:Top 10 by Cervantes · · Score: 1

      Dude, that is some seriously funny shit.

      "some sort of computer network thingy"

      Heh.

      I, for one, welcome our new Top 10 overlord.

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    3. Re:Top 10 by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      What you could do, being that its optical, is see if you can get it to produce holographic images of your internet traffic.

      now THAT would be realistic game play/porn watching/movie screening/tv streaming goooooodnnesssss (you choose) *drool*

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  73. Get two of them by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Take the bible set it up as a loop between them. Create the worlds best game of broken telephone.

  74. Time Travel? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Funny


    Put some instant coffee inside to see if I could go back in time....

  75. 8. "vi does it better" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    8. "vi does it better"

  76. OpenSource by TheIonix · · Score: 1

    Will this IOS be OpenSource too ? :)

  77. Same thing I do now by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    I'd still be connected to the net at the same speed so who cares.

  78. Newbie Question... by etLux · · Score: 1, Funny


    All this router stuff really confuses me.

    Could somebody please tell me how to hook this thing up to my PDA?

  79. Internet Traffic is fixed! by VanWEric · · Score: 1

    Now we just need to shift their focus from network traffic to car traffic - If people can't get to work to manage the router, it may as well be a box of crackerjacks. Now I am hungry for strange colored popcorn.

    --
    www.olin.edu
  80. BSEG... by mr.+methane · · Score: 3, Funny

    conf t
    int pos 2/0
    *giggle*
    shut
    *cackle*
    no shut
    *snort*
    shut
    *ROFL*
    no shut
    "Sir, I can't see anything wrong with the network. It must (shut) be a problem (no shut) with your equipment.

    1. Re:BSEG... by ivlad · · Score: 0

      - wait, we will do some debugging

      router# clear ip bgp *

    2. Re:BSEG... by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      ohnosecond: The time it takes you to realize you meant to type "...soft out" at the end of the line.

    3. Re:BSEG... by pyite · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile... on the other side...

      %SRP-4-WRAP_STATE_CHANGE: SRP2/0 wrapped on side B
      WHAT THE HELL

      %SRP-4-WRAP_STATE_CHANGE: SRP2/0 unwrapped on side B
      Huh?

      %SRP-4-WRAP_STATE_CHANGE: SRP2/0 wrapped on side B
      HEY! Stop that!

      %SRP-4-WRAP_STATE_CHANGE: SRP2/0 unwrapped on side B
      That's not funny!

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  81. What I would do is... by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sell it and pay off my mortgage.

  82. Pepsi vs. New Coke / Old Coke by sphealey · · Score: 1
    I think, it will be at least IOS-compatible from the point of view of CLI. The amount of people experienced with IOS CLI is quite big and I don't think, Cisco will/can affort selling incompatible OS.
    That is what interests me. At the time Coca-Cola brought out New Coke, the then-president of Pepsi said, "Coke now has two products: one we can beat in taste tests, and one their customers don't like". Sounded logical at the time, but in the end Coke increased its lead over Pepsi.

    Also, John Dvorak has noted that whenever Intel says "this chip isn't designed for desktops" they are about 3 months away from releasing a desktop version.

    So, where will Cisco go with this? Keep a specialized IOS version for carriers only? Or start filtering the new version down through the product line while claiming they aren't going to do that? Or some other strategy?

    sPh

    1. Re:Pepsi vs. New Coke / Old Coke by ivlad · · Score: 0

      So, where will Cisco go with this? Keep a specialized IOS version for carriers only?

      I hope no. They just finished moving away from CatOS CLI for switches, so dropping IOS CLI and going for something completly new looks ... strange...

      But you never know

    2. Re:Pepsi vs. New Coke / Old Coke by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Cisco will keep _a_ common interface to its products. Think the CatOS -> IOS transition on the switches.

      I still don't see your point tho.

      There is no one "IOS". Every Cisco router and switch needs it own image to support relavent hardware... CPU, mainboard etc.

      The only thing they have in common is the user interface. (okay.. and some of the MIBs).

      But compare a 2500 images to a 3660 image to an 12000 image and you are dealing with different beasts.

      Its only logical that the software you need to run a 92Tb core is different to that needed on a 2600 edge router.

      And your CCIE comment: Most CCIEs don't work on this stuff. Its carrier grade core. The CCIE exam uses 2600 and 3600 series routers: Edge and distribution layer stuff.

      Most CCIE stuff doesn't touch the core.

    3. Re:Pepsi vs. New Coke / Old Coke by pyite · · Score: 1

      Speaking of the CatOS -> IOS transition, that is going as unsmoothly as anyone could possibly conceive. That and I haven't met anyone who actually prefers the IOS interface to the CatOS interface. IOS's approach to switches appears to be such a hack, whereas the CatOS approach just makes sense.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  83. Slashdot has announced its new grammar checking by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    ...system, called editors.

    Cisco announces today it's new

    Obviously, the system is not all it's cracked up to be. (Or all its cracked up to be, either.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  84. What I'd do... by kill-9-0 · · Score: 1

    I'd post pictures of it online with a caption..."all your bandwidth are belong to us".

    --
    Liberalism...the next best thing to thinking.
  85. Eh? by cvd6262 · · Score: 1
    It also features IOS-XR and the first optical OC-768c/STM-256c optical Interface.

    From the department of redundancy department.

    --

    I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

  86. What would I do? by dentar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hook a modem up to it and start surfing!

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  87. IOS XR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard IOS XR is based around QNX micro-kernel OS. Any comments on QNX - I used to work with QNX, a nice distribute OS

  88. On /. by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

    I'd build a keggerator into it and bring it to LAN parties.

  89. First equipment with new interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well then, seeing this is the only piece of equipment with this interface, all you can do is hook them together.

  90. My pick up line... by GuyinVA · · Score: 1

    ...Hey there sweet thing. Wanna come back with me to my folks house, and I'll show you my 92 TBps Router in the basement?

    1. Re:My pick up line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not have paid your telecom bill cause you've got fine written all over you!

  91. Profit by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Erm duhhhh!

    1) Get 92TB/s router
    2) ??
    3) Profit!

    I think thats pretty obvious (but not too obvious to mod as redundant.. ah fuck it ive got more karma than piss!

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  92. sell it and pay my rent by waspleg · · Score: 1

    who has that much bandwidth anyway

  93. That's bits, folks... not bytes. by Slartibartfast · · Score: 1

    Should be 92 Tb/s. See the link. Still mighty zippy, though... I think I'll take two.

  94. I'd have first post on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    heh

  95. ...I'd buy a second one....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked with Cisco equipment for years......
    I'd buy a second one to use as a spare when the first on breaks ;)

  96. 92 Tbps not 92 TBps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Type-o or not, the slashdot post doesn't agree with cisco's own information. They say 92 Tbps, not 92 TBps. That's a difference of only 644 Tbps (80.5 TBps), but who's counting?

  97. Wow - talk about bizarre moderation by sphealey · · Score: 1

    I don't personally care about moderation one way or the other, but to moderate my OP "troll" and give this one +5 Informative borders a bit on the bizarre.

    sPh

  98. mirror by OglinTatas · · Score: 2, Funny

    mirror, in case of slashdotting

  99. The better question is... by datasetgo · · Score: 1

    what WOULDN'T I do with it. except maybe make my busted-ass dsl line faster.

  100. Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patent it.

  101. OOO - 92 Tbps worth of MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine, RIAA having a field day monitoring all those traffics. Wondering how that router handle all the Gnutella/P2P network.

  102. Cisco web by zcougar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can it make Cisco website faster?

  103. Carrier.....routing... by flicken · · Score: 1

    Am i the only one who immediately thought of RFC1149?

    --
    20 mil and I will! Learn Esperanto with 20M others.
  104. You're all missing one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Casemod it :)

  105. Longhorn Requirement by cylcyl · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, MS says such routers need to be installed in every home to allow the downloading of Longhorn patches.

    1. Re:Longhorn Requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And as a new feature in Longhorn, Windows will only hog 90Tbps of you internet connection.

  106. And the other 10%... by dark-br · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...would be ppl with lists of the other 90%.

    God, i love this place!

  107. What to do, what to do... by phyruxus · · Score: 4, Funny

    >>Are you thinking what I'm thinking, Pinky?
    >>I think so Brain, but how can we afford to get a router that can do 92 Tb/s?
    >>Pinky, what did I tell you about reading /. before we plot our schemes?

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  108. Avici 5Tb routers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scalable to 5Tbits - - - been aroud for about 5 years...

    http://www.avici.com

  109. Alternately by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd rent it out to the government, and then use the resulting rent to make payments on:

    (1) a condo in NYC
    (2) a Maserati
    (3) a NetJets account

  110. New Internet? by Renaissance+2K · · Score: 1

    With that much bandwidth, I'd make my own Internet.

    I think I'd call it... Internet Reloaded....

  111. I could finally.... by Excelsior · · Score: 2, Funny

    Keep my system up to date with windowsupdate.microsoft.com.

  112. two words... by pulse2600 · · Score: 1

    ...beowulf cluster...

  113. start building commander data's brain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    start building commander data's brain using the router for the postronic net...

  114. VOIP is the only application by jonasmit · · Score: 1

    I can think of that would need that capacity right now

  115. CISCO Using QNX by Kilkonie · · Score: 3, Informative
    I think the more interesting story might be what it's running.

    QNX Powers Universal Media Gateway for Next-Generation Digital Video Networks
    QNX Software Systems today announced that the QNX® Neutrino® realtime operating system (RTOS) will be shipping as part of the Cisco uMG9850 QAM Module, a new quadrature amplitude modulation product designed to let cable operators use Gigabit Ethernet to deliver video-on-demand and other multimedia services efficiently and cost-effectively to TV set-top receivers.

    'Little OS that could' just might
    "In a deal signed two years ago, Cisco (csco) chose QNX as its preferred real-time OS vendor as part of Cisco's 'ongoing efforts to increase the reliability and availability of data-voice-video networks.' Since then, not much seems to have materialized from the partnership."

    Cisco's HFR is here
    "The IOS-XR operating system kernel was acquired from QNX Software Systems, a small Canadian developer of realtime operating system code to companies in the automotive, communications, defense, industrial automation and medical device markets. Cisco already ships QNX operating system code in its uMG9850 QAM digital video module for the Catalyst 4500 Gigabit Ethernet switch."

    Cisco Unveils the HFR
    " The transition is analagous to Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT - message board) moving from DOS-based operating systems to Windows NT, says analyst Stephen Kamman of CIBC World Markets.

    Just as NT did, IOS XR could begin trickling down to lower-level systems, eventually permeating Cisco's entire portfolio, including edge and enterprise boxes. "The question is how quickly they can push that software through the product line," Kamman says."

    "The software is based on a kernel licensed from QNX Software Systems, but tailored for the job. 'We have made some pretty substantial modifications to [the QNX code] that are Cisco proprietary,' Volpi says."

    [Disclaimer: This is a very happy QNX Employee.]

  116. have sex with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at 450 megabits per second...

  117. Wow! by kihbord · · Score: 1

    I'd sell it and buy myself a house, car, ... and all the gadgets i can think of and retire 8-)

  118. More Importantly by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has Cisco installed the same backdoor as in previous version of their software?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  119. nice. by buht · · Score: 1

    I'll take 4.

    --

    -- The box said Windows 2000 or better... so I installed Linux
  120. It's just a PR bid. by sserendipity · · Score: 2, Insightful


    This is a just a bid for PR.

    Juniper's router interconnect product is being announced shortly, and will allow users to interconnect T640s already installed in their network - no forklift upgrade. Cisco just wants to get something in the news before it rolls out, so that they don't seem quite so much the technological also-rans that they are, in this space.

    Considering the number of delays this box's development has undergone, one can only imagine how many exciting 'Cisco features' have been left in to make this rush to market possible.

    1. Re:It's just a PR bid. by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 1

      Is it a bid for PR? Totally. Cisco has to constantly let everyone know that they are staying on the top. Every company does this. Did it work? Certainly. Every Slashdot nerd knows about it (not a real shocker), it make the SF Chronicle and all the nightly news. A bigger measure is that last night my dad came up to me and asked me if I'd heard of the new super fast Cisco router. This is the same guy who tries to tell me (continually) that the Internet at his work is different then the Internet at home. Why so? Well because apparently our internet is "from google" and his internet is "from Yahoo". So if this guy is paying attention to this stuff (granted he owns 100 shares) then I think their PR stunt paid off.

      --

      Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
  121. Bongos by marmot1101 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Us it to route TCP/IP Over Bongos

  122. I dont know how this is going to sell. by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Aside from those of us that are in the data wharehousing business most carriers are very space concious. Now I havent gone to look at the unit but even if they were all the size of the standard 3600 routers you're still talking a serious space consideration to even set this up.

    Not to mention medusa living on the back of this thing to connect it.

    I have also seen many carriers more critical centers and I can tell you not many of them would have the room without knocking out a few walls. Perhaps if some of them would finally rid theirselves of the outdated sun servers that for some reason have to be 12U high most of the time and run about as fast as a PII they could accomodate these.

  123. What would I do with a 92TBps router? by Anhaedra · · Score: 0

    I would download the internet, and shitloads of games and porn.

    --
    Please flee in terror in an orderly manner.
  124. OC-768? by concordeonetwo · · Score: 1

    Do they even make the OC-768 cables yet?

  125. I see no need for this... by revjd909 · · Score: 1

    I don't even own that many tablespoons, but even if I did, I don't know that I could route that many all at once.

    --
    *** once i really listened, the noise just went away. -liz phair
  126. Re:Mercatur Mon Amour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet the site will close soon.

  127. More like... WWJDW92TBR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Would Jesus Do With a 92TBps Router?

  128. Soup it up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah ... dual exhaust, headers, big fat tires, lots of crome...

  129. How is this news? by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

    Pluris offered a scalable multi-terabit router back in 2001. Avici offered something somewhat similar (but not as good, in my biased opinion), and AFAIK it is still available.

  130. What Cisco are doing by Mr.+Moose · · Score: 1

    1. Build 92Tbps router
    2. Test it by posting a story on /.
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!

  131. Hard drive limitations by ug_rulz_all · · Score: 0

    It seems kind of a waste considering a desktop hard drive can only write up to about 133 megabytes per second. You would need one hell of a huge RAID configuration in order to write data at the rate that it would come through the router.

    1. Re:Hard drive limitations by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

      What does a desktop hard drive have to do with a router?

  132. I want the one mentioned in the headline... by Mr.+Moose · · Score: 1

    It's 8 times faster than the one in the article

  133. Juniper T640 node by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hmmm, looking at the T640 node docs this seems to say that the CRS-1 is the same, 1.2Tbs. The Juniper docs don't say how many nodes can go in a matrix tho, could be more/less than 72.

    A bigger issue with someone who would compare them is that all features are available, and have been for over a year, on the T640 node but the CRS-1 most are TBD on a spanking new OS.

    Other points are the T640 node takes half the space and less power; could be an issue if realestate and HVAC are costly...

    It will be interesting to watch Juniper and Cisco snipe at each other in the upcomming CRS-1 vs T640 battle!

    1. Re:Juniper T640 node by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, looking at the T640 node docs this seems to say that the CRS-1 is the same, 1.2Tbs. The Juniper docs don't say how many nodes can go in a matrix tho, could be more/less than 72.

      127 eventually, from the specs I have seen.

      But first you have to get 127 T640s all in the same room :>
  134. GigE Switch $59 at Fry's, port cards $19 by billstewart · · Score: 1
    My DSL gets up to ~1Mbps, so a Gigabit Ethernet sounds like the obvious choice for home wiring.

    On the other hand, the new Cisco router costs 10,000 times as much and is almost 100,000 times as fast, so perhaps the Cisco *is* a better deal!

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  135. Who, me? by RichardX · · Score: 1

    I'd probably use it as a footstool or doorstop or something. Or maybe just take it down to the pub, and be all like "'ssup d00dz.. check out my pimpin' new 92 Tbps router. It routes!"

    --
    Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  136. Hide it in Tannis by Chucklz · · Score: 1

    I would hide the Ark of Cisco in the city of Tannis. Any network that carried this infront of it would be immune to getting /.'ed. But, you have to be careful for those network Nazis. Now, does anyone know where I could get a staff of RAM ?

  137. I'll tell you what I'd do, man by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1

    two chicks at the same time.

  138. Ea$y... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fir$t, I'll $ell it.

    Then, a new audi RS, a vacation, a little liposuction and to replace it, two used Cisco 2600's.

  139. sell it to bush! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who's wasting $450,000 on computer equip these days? why only the US gov of course! we'll just tack it onto the new TIA system thus completing our monitoring system so we can now monitor the whereabouts of all traffic, information, and people there are!

    finally, we can do more to agressively question people of color at the border, on the street, or wherever else in (iraq) they may be!

    maybe we'll even proofread digital photos now! so nobody knows!

  140. Not sure where Cisco gets 96Terrabits from? by BigG+In+Tokyo · · Score: 1

    Not sure where Cisco gets 96Terabits from? 72 Chassis with 16 slots of 40Gigabite available - 72x16*40=46080Terabits. The slot capacity is 40Gigabits, not 80. Surely they're not marketing their 40Gig slots as full duplex 80Gig throughput slots... OC768 doesn't do full duplex! So 96 urm - bollocks more like!

  141. misread? by harmanjd · · Score: 1

    I hope I am not the only person who misread "carrier routing system" as "carrier PIGEON routing system". Talk about flashbacks to old slashdot posts.

  142. Space, Electricity, and Heat by Elvon+Livengood · · Score: 1

    The CRS-1 is a huge mucking beast. Seven feet tall, 23" wide, 36" deep. Fully loaded, it weighs over 1500 lbs. Then there's power. Using 120v AC, it would take over 130 amps to run the sucker. Then you need over three tons of air conditioner to cool it.

    Nah, I think I'll keep the 4-port Linksys.

  143. What I'd do... by BigG+In+Tokyo · · Score: 1

    Buy shares in power companies. To run 72 chassis to get the bandwidth they're touting needs approximately 1 megawatt of power.

  144. I'll tell you what I would do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd make a video out of me beating the thing with a hammer, burning it in effigy, and then sending the charred remains back to Cisco (Cisco sucks) w/a copy of the video.

    I'd submit a link to the video to /. which, would a) be posted 1-2 weeks later, or b) posted w/someone else getting the credit for the post. Hemos and Taco are such fuckheads.

    Ultimately though, I'd do it just to annoy geeks around the world.

  145. Even Funnier... by jcain · · Score: 1

    erase start [confirm] Y reload

  146. It runs QNX by Animats · · Score: 1
    It's now official. This beast QNX. (Someone else pointed this out, but didn't provide a link.)

    There are many QNX machines around, but most of them are "faceless". Railroad switchyard control. Nuclear power plants. Avionics. And now, big routers.

  147. Different Topics by fiber0pti · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that the exact same story is categorized under different topics.

  148. Error in the PDF by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

    From http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/p roducts/ps5763/c1031/cdccont_0900aecd800f8118.pdf

    "Each route processor manages shelf controller functions and supports up to 4 GB of DRAM plus a 40-Gbps hard drive for storing software images and dumps."

    I'm sure they meant "40 GB hard drive"

    OTOH, if they have a 40Gbps HD, I sure could use one.....no more need for that expensive RAM....swapping will be plenty fast. ;-P

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  149. Buy plenty of good lumber ... by TahitiNut · · Score: 1

    ... and get rid of my old Craftsman router, of course.

  150. hmmm lessee by creat10n · · Score: 1

    i'd change my name to Sisquo and then i'd have a KRS-1 router