Slashdot Mirror


Can TiVo be Saved?

ChipGuy writes "TiVo's death watch has begun. The company is having a tough time finding traction in the marketplace, as more and more competitors rush into the market, most of them deep pocketed satellite and cable companies. But is all lost? What if the company went private and became the anti-cable, letting us download, store, organize, and serve media from both cable and -- this is the important part -- the internet. Others believe that TiVo should get into the content aggregation business."

604 comments

  1. don't have TiVo... Yet by lecithin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have held off from getting TiVo or the equivalant as I had figured that this would happen. Just like most types of technology things get smaller and cheaper. (then the big boys take over)

    I figure that the Cable companies are going to move very quickly in this arena. My own (Comcast) offers "On Demand" programming right now for free. I can view programs, store and play later as if it were a movie/DVD. It sounds like the next step is to watch what ever you want, when you want as long as you pay what they want.

    I can wait for it all to come together, I know how to program my VCR.

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Tivo got rid of the subscription model, I'd buy a Tivo box right now. While I haven't see any Myth TV linux solutions, I have seen comcast On-Demand with video recorder counterparts. And Tivo feels like a rip off in comparison.

    2. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 4, Insightful
      My own (Comcast) offers "On Demand" programming right now for free. I can view programs, store and play later as if it were a movie/DVD. It sounds like the next step is to watch what ever you want, when you want as long as you pay what they want.

      Have you actually used on Demand? You only get what Comcast decides to store; you don't get to choose what programs you can time-shift. and, of course, you're not "storing" anything -- you're getting whatever programs are held centrally.

      The "VCR-style" buttons are a joke -- there's a 4-5 second delay between your remote control button press and the response (good luck trying to stop a program at a given location!).

      And, it may "seem" that the next step is full on-demand access to programming, but that's quite naive. keep in mind -- this "on demand" functionality only appeared as a response to DVR feature sets; if DVR competition were to disappear from the marketplace, and their chokehold on content distribution restored, do you really expect them to expand this functionality?!?!

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    3. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by mzwaterski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think of the lifetime subscription as a fixed cost for the TiVo box...did you buy your TiVo yet?

    4. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by jcostantino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can buy the box and a lifetime subscription instead of subsidizing the cost of the Tivo via the monthly fee. Unfortunately, it seems as though the "lifetime" of the company won't allow you to get you money's worth on a lifetime subscription.

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    5. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by lecithin · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have used on-Demand. You are correct, the storage is not local.

      It may be a 'joke' to you, but it works and right now for free. (and you can store some things locally)

      No. I don't expect them to expand functionality. I expect them to buy somebody that knows how to do it right. Then they can fuck it up well.

      --
      It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    6. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      My cable company will be starting to offer DVRs inside the cable boxes soon, as well as the current on-demand programming.

    7. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      " If Tivo got rid of the subscription model, I'd buy a Tivo box right now. "

      This puzzles me....are there really THAT many people out there that pay the monthly fee, rather than the one time lifetime sub. fee? I figure the one time chunk of money into the whole price.

      Maybe its me...I hate paying monthly on something if I can get it all out of the way once and for all...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      I have held off from getting TiVo or the equivalant as I had figured that this would happen

      I don't think there is a need to hold off on a PVR out of concern that the company will go away, at least if your TV service provider is reasonable and you buy one that they support.

      I bought an UltimateTV a few months before Microsoft/RCA/DirectTV killed that product, but Microsoft and DirectTV have provided a couple of major updates since then, and it has continued working fine.

      Perhaps at some point, DirectTV will stop supporting it, and I'll have to move to something else, but I expect they will offer a good deal on that, and overall I'll be better off than if I'd went without a PVR while waiting for the "final" solution to arrive.

    9. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      I figure that the Cable companies are going to move very quickly in this arena.

      My cable company (WideOpenWest) began offering PVR service so I ordered it to see how it compared to my MythTV. To say I was disappointed was an understatement. Other than being able to record digital pay channels without needing an IR blaster the thing was basically useless. It crashed constantly and was nothing more than a glorified VCR. It was a Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8000 something or other. Piece of crap! To top it all off, the one saving grace that it may have had, a firewire port, was disabled.

    10. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 1

      I don't think there is a need to hold off on a PVR out of concern that the company will go away, at least if your TV service provider is reasonable and you buy one that they support.

      The problem is that all of the tv listing data is collected and made available to your TiVo by TiVo themselves. How will your unit get listing updates if they stop providing them?

      Unless TiVo releases a software update to point to some sort of public source or if they somehow manage to keep releasing updates (bought by someone else maybe?) you're kind of stuck.

    11. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      Comcast offers both "On Demand" branded video-on-demand and an integrated DVR/Digital cable box. The On Demand service is mostly useless unless you subscribe to premium channels, but it is pretty cool if you have HBO. Otherwise the content consists largely of glorified onfomercials and pay per view movies. Comcast also has DVR settop boxes available for an additional monthly fee. These function more or less like a TiVo, and are certainly no cheaper than many TiVo configurations. For example, where I live Comcasts "Digital Plus" package is $63.50 monthly and a DVR box is an extra $15.00/month for a total of $78.50/month. I currently subscribe to an similar package with DirecTV/TiVo for a total of $47/month ($42 for programming + $5 for TiVo).

      --
      i forget
    12. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by topham · · Score: 1


      Those of us in Canada get listings from Zap2It.
      We use a program, or programs which parse the data from Zap2It and load it into the Tivo. (2 of the tivos in my care are un-hacked. They run the software as supplied from Tivo but use guide data supplied via Zap2It.).

      (All the Tivos I deal with either have life-time subscription, or are subscribed monthly).

      If Tivo were to go out of business and shut it's doors tomorrow my Tivo's would continue to work until they suffered a hardware failure.

    13. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Plus a lot of Comcast customers are complaining that their on-demand boxes freeze up a lot.

      And before you post the obligatory "but I've never had any trouble with mine!" -- spare me. A high failure rate is a high failure rate, even if the non-failure rate is even higher.

    14. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by fish+waffle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This puzzles me....are there really THAT many people out there that pay the monthly fee, rather than the one time lifetime sub. fee? I figure the one time chunk of money into the whole price.

      Lifetime subscriptions, as yours is about to attest, are really min(my lifetime, company lifetime).

      People go through this with every new fad and new technology/service. Health clubs used to all have "lifetime memberships", but at least in my area that became highly regulated many years ago because so many people thought it was a much better deal than paying per month, but then got burned when the companies went out of business 2 months later.

      I don't like subscriptions either, but "lifetime" subscriptions are not the best (for the consumer) alternative. Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

    15. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by dioscaido · · Score: 2

      The lifetime subscription price is $299 versus $12.95 a month, that gives you 2 years to break even from the lifetime subscription. Having purchased the Tivo recently (and hacked it to 320 hours, whoot!), I realized that 2 years is an awful long time in a market that is only just emerging. In all probability, this tivo box will be obsolete by the time 2007 rolls around and I'll be changing my service anyway, or Tivo will be out of business altogether. So, I chose the monthly subscription.

    16. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by kkovach · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have/had three TiVos.

      I loved TiVo when it came out and bought the lifetime subscription. I was pretty certain that it would be worth it, and it was. I think it paid for itself in like 2 or 3 years. Then, when my first unit died, I was able to transfer the lifetime subscription to another machine. That was nice.

      Then, I bought another one for the basement. I wanted to get the lifetime subscription, but at the time they had a deal for the monthly fee and not for the lifetime service.

      I did the math and I'd have to have the unit for like 4 or 5 years for it to be worth it. For multiple reasons, this was a little longer than I thought it might last so I got the monthly fee.

      I really wanted the lifetime service and tried talking them into some kind of similar discount for the lifetime service. They wouldn't budge and probably lost out on a couple hundered bucks from me.

      - Kevin

      --
      The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
    17. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by AstroPup · · Score: 1

      Wow! So for the years I've enjoyed Tivo to the point where I don't watch TV without it you've been holding off to see who wins.

      You don't understand the power of Tivo. There is no way you can program your VCR and come close to what Tivo brings to the table.

    18. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Quarters · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I have held off from getting TiVo or the equivalant as I had figured that this would happen.

      You've missed out on having a really useful appliance for over five years. I understand being pragmatic, but that's like saying "I didn't get a computer, console, etc..) because I knew the successor would be out about a half decade later."

    19. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Momoru · · Score: 1

      I have Comcast OnDemand and the Comcast DVR. I was ready to buy a Tivo until comcast started offering their DVR...no hardware to buy, it records HD, about 40 hours of programming, and only $10 a month? Sure the functionality is no where near as cool as Tivo (Comcast's is really barebones), but the cost of Tivo hardware just puts it too far out of the ballgame, and the fact that it couldn't do HD until recently, plus all their latest content restrictions for the Tivo to go make it really lose its shine. As far as OnDemand goes, its definitely no substitute for a DVR, but it is still really useful if you don't want to pony up the money for one. If you have HBO for instance, you can view any movie or TV series HBO is currently showing. Say I can't record the Sopranos on Sunday cuz i'm already recording desperate housewives or whatever...with Tivo i would have to wait til the next airing of the Sopranos, say Tuesday night, but with OnDemand, its already ready for me to watch Monday morning (if not sunday night).

    20. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Most of the DirecTV subscribers are paying per month as its only $5 a month, and DirecTV doesn't really offer a lifetime subscription. Though if you had one of the early generation lifetime subscriptions to TiVo before moving over to DirecTiVo, you could transfer your subscription. Now the subscriptions are only transferable to the same model tivo so they don't transfer to an upgrade or from a regular TiVo to a DirecTiVo. Either way you would still have to pay the almost 5 dollars a month charge DirecTV charges for additional boxes (assuming you have more than one) a charge which is waved if you are paying the $5 dollars for the TiVo box. So basically it makes sense to have the lifetime if its your only box, otherwise it doesn't. Either way at $5 dollars a momth you would have to have it for 5 years (at the $299.00 lifetime subscription rate, of course discounts are available) before you would make your money back, not really a good deal.

    21. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by gerbache · · Score: 1

      I've been saying the same thing since I got mine. The only time I don't use the Tivo is when I'm watching an HD program, and I wouldn't benefit from Comcast's HD DVR box because I refuse to pay Comcast for the digital cable service.

      I'm with you about VCRs just not being in the same ballpark as the Tivo. Until someone else makes a UI that's as slick as theirs, I'm sold.

    22. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by bunny+ear+tv · · Score: 1

      Just as a data point, I bought a Replay TV about 3 months before SonicBlue went under and Denon bought them up. I had purchased a lifetime subscription for my unit, and Denon has honored that agreement. So, it's definitely a variable, but it just depends on who picks up the company, and how much they want to piss off / not piss off their user base.

    23. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      The Comcast cable by me offers a DVR box for like an extra $5 USD a month. It's a replacement digital TV box that has a hard drive and what-not on it. You still get the OnDemand content if you want, or you can record your own.

      I'm pretty sure with that, you can record digital channes (from 150 to 400 by me), and the dual-tuner models should be out soon (so you can record 1 show and watch another).

      I used a friend's, and while it's definately no Tivo, it's not... bad. I'd still prefer it if Tivo was still in the running.

    24. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Better yet, why dont Tivo and NetFlix partner/merge. They could provide a complete conenction to millions of titles. All you do is set your queue and it will DL directly to the tivo device.

      Also, what could be done is each device that gets a title registers with the seeder, and it will DL/UL titles via swarming (Bittorrent) from the other devices that have/want the same titles.

      Securing the network can be tricky, sure - but that part ill leave to tivo/netflix/hackers.

    25. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by eigerface · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I went with the monthly subscription. At $12.95 a month, it would take 23 months to break even.

      Considering that you are dealing with an always on hard drive, I just wasn't sure that the unit would last 23 months before requiring an upgrade or repair.

      Add to that I have Dish Network. I don't do cable. I believe that in the not so distant future, both Dish Network and DirecTV will be offering a set-top box AND DVR as a combined package as standard equipment, and at a rate that is comparable to Dish alone and TiVo, with an acceptable maintenance package that would render the issue of hard drive reliability moot.

    26. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by blogeasy · · Score: 1

      The monthly fees and lifetime subscription fee seem like a lot of money to spend for a service that might not be there. I purchased the Toshiba SDH-400 several years ago for just over $300 and it includes the TIVO basic service for free. It doesn't have all the extra frills of the paid service, but it's enough to get the guide and record the programs you want. This was and still is one of the best products I have bought in a while. For a couple hundred more than the TIVO ($99 plus subscription fees), I got a nice PVR that has already paid for itself in terms of subscription fees.

      --

      Browse the Information Directory
    27. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Gudlyf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why pay any fee at all? I grabbed one of the Toshiba Tivo/DVD Series2 units from EBay for about $120, which includes TiVo service, albeit "Basic" service. (Basic service doesn't allow Season Pass subscriptions but you can still record shows as normal, use the guide, pause live shows, etc.)

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    28. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by bi_boy · · Score: 1

      They make their money off of the subscriptions as opposed to the hardware. Like the console games industry makes money from games rather than the hardware.

      --
      Chicken fried butter sticks? Do ... do you use a fork? - Black Mage, 8-Bit Theater
    29. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      MythTV boxes are about as expensive as a TiVo and the "lifetime" subscription, and then you own the equipment and can repurpose or expand it if you want to. And you don't have to buy seperate subscriptions for every X boxes, and you can have frontend and backend systems.

      Seems like a better deal to me.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    30. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      and DirecTV will be offering a set-top box AND DVR as a combined package I paid $100 for 2 new DirecTiVo units in the spring of 2002. This is not new technology.

      --
      i forget
    31. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by bigpat · · Score: 1

      "If Tivo got rid of the subscription model, I'd buy a Tivo box right now. While I haven't see any Myth TV linux solutions, I have seen comcast On-Demand with video recorder counterparts. And Tivo feels like a rip off in comparison."

      Well, and also make the price reasonable. I'm really not interested at all in Tivo "service". I just want a machine that has video recording with a simple scheduler and playback and can easily store and transfer video data for archival purposes, all for under $250.

      As far as I can tell the only thing of value that the "service" povides beyond the machine is a tv program schedule. But I can figure it out myself when my favorite tv show is playing and which channel it is on and set this. I don't think that a program guide is worth hundreds of dollars or any amount of money. It is just not a feature I am interested in paying for. Sure you say, just pay the "lifetime" fee and you don't have to think about it as if you are paying for a service, but once you add that in then the price is too high.

      I'm only willing to spend sub $250 for recording, storage and playback functionality that this price provides, even then I consider storage as something that should be seperable, considering people have widely varying storage requirements. So, some sort of netwrok transfer capability or removeable media is good.

      I just don't watch enough tv to justify this or any great expense given that at most I would only want to record one or two shows per week. And get along just fine now watching reruns for shows that I miss.

      Myth TV or Freevo are options, but these are still too expensive and time consuming to be attractive.

      I may be a minority, but I think there are many more like me that only watch a few shows per week and will not budget as much money as tivo requires for what is really a very limited set of functionality in support of entertainment.

    32. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by timbck2 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Lifetime subscriptions, as yours is about to attest, are really min(my lifetime, company lifetime).


      Actually, the TiVo "lifetime" subscription is min(the TiVo unit's lifetime, company lifetime). Of course the only parts of the TiVo prone to failure are the hard drives and modem; the hard drive is replaceable, and the modem is circumventable. So you could say the effective lifetime of a TiVo unit is unlimited.
      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    33. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're like my former roommate who wouldn't buy music on CD because something else might come along. Well, how about the here and now. You've could of had years of use out of a Tivo, a product thousands of people swear is the greatest tv tool there is. What would it matter if the company went under? The price you paid for the unit/months used would make it attractive.

      Instead you wait until the so-called dying days and tell people 'see, I knew it'.

    34. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by jarich · · Score: 1
      Better yet, why dont Tivo and NetFlix partner/merge. They could provide a complete conenction to millions of titles. All you do is set your queue and it will DL directly to the tivo device.

      Someone mod this post up! It's the best idea I've heard in a long time. Since Netflix already has "unlimited" rentals, this is just removing the physical media from the equation. They could sell the subscriptions at the same price and remove the expense of shipping. Also, since anyone with a DVD player in their computer can already rip a DVD, shipping an electronic copy wouldn't create any additional piracy exposure.

      I've got a DirectTV Tivo but I'd pay another $10 or $20 a month for unlimited Netflix video "rentals".

    35. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by mlrtime · · Score: 1


      Do you mean you use it as a glorified VCR? Or can you download the guide and schedule something in advanced?

      I thought the guide data was the subscription.

    36. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're missing he best part of TiVo, then. Seasons passes is what makes TiVo great. It would be like buying a Mac with XP on it. Why bother - just get a beige box.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    37. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by havoc · · Score: 1

      I've had my TiVo for about 6 years now... Long enough that I have forgotten what it was like to watch TV without it. So how long do you usually wait for technology you want to get smaller and cheaper? Technology is always in flux, sometimes waiting is justified (HDTV) and sometimes it is not (TiVo).

    38. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by jarich · · Score: 1
      are there really THAT many people out there that pay the monthly fee

      I have a DirectTV Tivo and it costs me $5 a month. Since I might ditch the dish at some point and go to a cable/MythTV solution, I prefer a nice cheap monthly fee.

    39. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I use a Dish Network 508 PVR right now, and it works acceptably... but not as good as an actual Tivo-brand box. It's a HELL of a lot cheaper, though-- $5 a month, but I got a special deal and got it for $50 flat-rate. (They also have a 7-something PVR with dual-inputs, and a really expensive HDTV one as well.)

      But here's the question... how the hell does a Tivo box that's sitting on a shelf above the satellite reciever change the channel as needed? What kind of weird wiring hack did you have to do to get that to work?

    40. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Issue9mm · · Score: 5, Informative

      It probably isn't being modded up because a Tivo/NetFlix coop is already in the works.

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5915470/site/newswee k/

      -9mm-

    41. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by TaylorTAP · · Score: 1

      I think Google should buy TiVo... I think they will..

    42. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe something that would help save Tivo is if they actually RELEASED their product in Canada... There's not one good PVR commercially available here... The nearest thing is the ExpressVu (same hardware as Dish network), and of course that only works if you have satellite.

      I've always been puzzled by Tivo's refusal to enter the Canadian market and have never seen a good explanation from them on why they don't sell their products here. Hell, we love our TV up here and they'd sell like crazy...

      N>

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    43. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by JoeD · · Score: 4, Informative

      But here's the question... how the hell does a Tivo box that's sitting on a shelf above the satellite reciever change the channel as needed? What kind of weird wiring hack did you have to do to get that to work?

      The same way a Tivo sitting on the shelf above the cable box changes channels - there's a little IR emitter that you position in front of the box, and the Tivo sends the appropriate commands to change the channel.

      With some model satellite receivers (DirecTV only, I think), the serial port on the back of the Tivo hooks up to the serial port on the back of the receiver and changes channels that way.

    44. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "I'm only willing to spend sub $250 for recording, storage and playback functionality that this price provides, even then I consider storage as something that should be separable, considering people have widely varying storage requirements. So, some sort of network transfer capability or removable media is good."

      Have you considered a VCR?

      "Myth TV or Freevo are options, but these are still too expensive and time consuming to be attractive."

      So you want TiVo to be cheaper than you can build it yourself? How do expect that to happen? I mean really there is not that much margin on computer parts that they can make it up on volume. Yea I want a LearJet but I only want to pay $500 for it since I do not fly that often. Oh yea and I want it to get 40mpg as well. If you want Myth TV or Freevo cheaper than a TiVo I suggest you just wait a few months and hit Ebay for parts.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    45. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      How hack-y. Plus that probably wouldn't even fit in my entertainment center with the doors closed... looks like I made the right choice.

      Of course, I figured any way of getting the Tivo to change the reciever's channel has got to be at least a little hack-y, since my Dish Network reciever doesn't seem to have any sort of computer input ports.

    46. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by brakk · · Score: 1

      Just curious... I just "upgraded" my ReplayTV with a 250gig HD and got about 250 hours out of it (at "standard" quality). What size HD did you put in your Tivo to get 320?

    47. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You can buy the box and a lifetime subscription instead of subsidizing the cost of the Tivo via the monthly fee.
      If you pay that lifetime subscription, you have no idea what you're buying. First is the issue of whether they stay in business, as you noted. But besides that, they reserve the right to change the service at any time in the future... previous "upgrades" include reporting your viewing back to TiVo, automatically recording comercials, and now (from what I hear) interrupting fast-forwarding to show (more) commercials.

      The initial outlay is too risky when you don't know what you're really in for.

    48. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Drawkcab · · Score: 1

      I bought mine a year and a half ago with the lifetime subscription, and not much has changed since then. And at that point it already seemed like DVRs had been around for quite a while already. I can't imagine any pressing need to replace it for at least another 4 or 5 years. It doesn't make sense to go replacing everything you own every two years, even consumer electronics. Even if TiVo is ultimately doomed, 2 years is way too fast for it to be so dead and gone that it can't keep updating program listings. It'll take years for them to stop selling set top boxes, and years after that before it stops being in their interest to maintain basic service.

    49. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's the joy of going with Dish network over DirecTV. Their hardware is all designed by Dish Network, which basically comes down to one guy working at slave labor prices - and he finds interesting ways to pass his misery off on you.

      No serial port? Check.
      Unstable PVR? Check.
      Poor feature set? Check.

      Woo! Boy do I feel like saving $10/month with Dish.

    50. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by a1englishman · · Score: 1

      The DirectTV Tivo has two built-in satelight receivers. It does not need to interface with anything except your dish. With it I can record up to two programs at once, which comes in handy. Only have a two horn dish, and want to use another receiver, then just get a mutli-way switch. They're cheep on eBay, a rip-off at The Shack or BB.

      You got questions? Yeah, we got answers. The wrong answers.

    51. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lifetime subscription price is $299 versus $12.95 a month, that gives you 2 years to break even from the lifetime subscription.

      You are correct, but its a little more complicated than that. The present value of a future $12.95 annuity, assuming a return of 8%, would break even in 26 months. A higher rate of return on that $299 would make you take even longer to break even...

    52. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The lifetime subscription price is $299 versus $12.95 a month, that gives you 2 years to break even from the lifetime subscription.

      That was my reasoning as well, and I wasn't sure if I was actually going to like it enough to make $200+ use of it. (I bought mine when the monthly and lifetime subscription were cheaper.)

      After about a year of paying for the monthly service, Tivo announced they were increasing prices, so I decided to spring for the lifetime. It's been 2 years since then, so it's definately been worth it. Guess I should have done the lifetime to start with and I would have saved myself ~$100.

      If mine died and I had to buy a new lifetime to go with a Series 2, I'd do it tomorrow.

      I am investigating building a MythTV box though. Not because I'm unhappy with the Tivo, but because I am interested in the additional capabilities of MythTV (games, web, home automation, etc).

    53. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by mcnadeau · · Score: 1

      I just had a DVR installed yesterday by my cable company (Wide Open West, which was formerly known as Americast), and I love it. You can record two different programs at a time, the remote is really easy to use, and it's only costing me an additional $2 per month to use it. I'll take that over TiVo's $13 per month any day.

    54. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by dioscaido · · Score: 1

      I put in two 160Gb drives.

    55. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a VCR? Wow... what is that like?

    56. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Rico_Suave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If you pay that lifetime subscription, you have no idea what you're buying."

      Not really... $300 will buy you approximately two years of programming ($12.95 a month). If Tivo lasts longer than that, you win!

    57. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by uradu · · Score: 1

      > The Comcast cable by me offers a DVR box for like an extra $5 USD a month.

      Are you quite sure about that? Because in many markets that seems to be $9.99 or $14.99, on top of the most expensive basic digital TV package out there, for the probably worst picture quality of all digital TV providers. I seriously looked into Comcast digital cable because of massive tree growth obscuring my view of the southern sky, but to get similar programming (actually less) to what I get from DirecTV now for less than $50, I would have to pay around $80. In Comcast's mind they're obviously still a monopoly. I think I will just hunt satellite signals some more instead.

    58. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, my on demand let's me select up to 2 shows that are airing right now or at a future time and date and record them.

      I guess you dont know what the full on-demand product is.

      on demand = ppv and free content that you do not have to record PLUS a dual tuner PVR box that will record anything you want for you. the next version of the PVR software will have a "season pass" functionality.

      do you really know what the entire on-demand product is?

      just because you have a half assed version does not mean it's what everyone else has.

    59. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by daVinci1980 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I can wait for it all to come together, I know how to program my VCR.

      That's great that you know how to program your VCR.

      Please set up your VCR to record only first-run episodes of Law & Order that come on NBC, and all episodes that come on TNT. Oh, but don't record an episode if you've recorded in the previous 30 days. And please make sure to automatically have your VCR keep up with the scheduling, so that when NBC decides to start adding one extra minute to the show to throw of your VCR, it records the extra minute as well. Oh, and if the Simpsons comes on at the same time as any of those episodes on TNT, please record those instead. And when the network delays the start of Law and Order because the baseball game went long, please make sure to have your VCR pick up on that as well. Oh, and given that I like Law and Order, could you please set up your VCR to record other shows that it feels I might be interested in.

      People who make the argument that Tivo is just a smarter VCR completely miss the point. They're akin to the people who assume that any article that begins with 'Bill Gates donated $1B to help immunize people in third world countries' must end with 'in a bid to avoid paying taxes.'

      Tivo is not just a smart VCR. It's not missing shows that you want to watch. It's watching your shows in 21 minutes per 30 minutes recorded. It's keeping track of schedule changes. It's coming home late at night and watching *whatever the hell you want to.*

      But look on the bright side. Assuming that this (like every other doomsday article to come out about Tivo in the last five years) is correct, you can rest assured that you didn't waste any money on bending TV to your will. Me? I'm glad to have given $500 to a company who makes a great product, and I wish them the greatest success.

      --
      I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    60. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Smack · · Score: 1

      I've never had enough faith in Tivo as a company to go for lifetime. I figure the second I do they'll go bankrupt.

    61. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Babbster · · Score: 1
      All folks have to do is take a look at ReplayTV. The company that originally started making the boxes is dust in the wind. But, SonicBlue picked up the ball and has managed to keep the business going, while keeping the pre-existing boxes flush with guide updates.

      The thing is, people look at this situation and make some sort of assumption that TiVo will fail and just become nothingness. The truth is that, even if the brand isn't working for the current company, another company (DirecTV, for example, could be a perfect fit) could buy what's left of TiVo and would be able to easily keep the old boxes updated.

    62. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Correcting some inaccuracies:

      The reporting and recording of optionally viewable "showcase" commercials have always been there, afaik. The manual describes how to opt out of the reporting if you'd like. The sponsored commercials (a few a month) are recorded to a part of the disk reserved for that purpose, so they don't take away from the normal recording space.

      Fast forwarding is not interrupted to show commercials. What has been described (but not yet implemented) is display of a banner paid for by an advertiser during a commercial that you're fast forwarding through. So you might see "press thumbs up for more information about Bud" at the top of the screen as a beer commercial speeds by.

      Do you have a TiVo? You make a good point about paying up front for a service whose features might change later but diminish it by describing changes that didn't happen.

    63. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by djw · · Score: 1
      Lifetime subscriptions, as yours is about to attest, are really min(my lifetime, company lifetime).
      It's worse than that: in TiVo's case, "lifetime" refers to the lifetime of the device, not the user.
    64. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by TeamSPAM · · Score: 1

      Also, note that the lifetime subscription is tied to the physical device and not the subscriber. I had a series 1, it is possible that I should've bought the lifetime subscription for it. I now own one of the TiVo DVD burners. I still resisted the lifetime subscription as I hope to upgrade to a better model (ie opencard/HDTV) before it would be worth it.

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    65. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      3 day/72hr really limit on the guide with basic.
      no "record by name of show/actor/actress/type"

      you can set recurring shows (based on day of channel, day of week, or m-f, or seven days a week)

      you don't get folders for shows

      it still downloads a full boat of guide details, I've had my tivo disconnected for long term, and it took about a month for guide data to be incomplete, at which point I plugged in, and hit "connect now" and 15 mins or so later had the next month.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    66. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DirecTV TiVos are integrated units with two tuners inside the box. The satellite cables plug into the DirecTiVo just like they would into any other sat. receiver.

    67. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by djp928 · · Score: 1

      The real question still is, does it have the equivalent of TiVo's "Season Pass" feature? For me, that's the killer app of TiVo. I will not buy a DVR that does not offer something similar.

      -- Dave

    68. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      I don't like subscriptions either, but "lifetime" subscriptions are not the best (for the consumer) alternative. Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

      A subscription only makes sense if the service is actually worth something. The razor and blades model works for Gillette because 80% of the cost of the product is in the razor head, the handle is just a piece of moulded plastic that anyone can make for a few cents in volume. The difficult part is making those razor heads, sharpening them and setting them.

      Tivo is not a good fit for the razor and blades model. The information that Tivo provides to the system is cheap to acquire. There is no reason that the subscription should cost more than $12.50 for the year. If there was an open market for the subscription side of the product the cost would be negligible.

      The cost of the Tivo unit is not negligible, the Tivo requires pretty much a full PC platform, including a large hard drive. That is an expensive proposition. The razor and blades model breaks down if you end up selling the razor at too a big loss.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    69. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by jerkychew · · Score: 1

      You're comparing apples to oranges.

      On Demand lets you view a limited number of shows or movies that Comcast decides are available. And very few of them are free. The vast majority of the shows or movies you can pick cost extra.

      As for Comcast's DVR. It's an additional $10 per month for the box, so there's your subscription. I priced the difference between Comcast and Tivo per month, and Comcast won by a whopping 3 dollars.

      Granted, that doesn't count the inital cost of the Tivo hardware. But, I've had the Comcast DVR for 6 months or so, and it is a pile of crap. The list of complaints I have are so large that I'm not going to spell them out here. The only reason I haven't brought it back is because I'm a lazy bastard.

    70. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Spectra72 · · Score: 1
      I'm on a monthly subscription. I just received a Tivo as a Christmas present and frankly, after doing some research, I came away with ZERO confidence that Tivo as a company would be around in the 2+ years it would take me to recoup my lifetime subscription investment. Since I got the box as a gift, I'm not tied to keeping it if Tivo goes belly up tommorow. I haven't hacked it or upgraded it. No need. I don't watch that much TV anyways so if Alias gets deleted due to space issues, it's no big deal.

      With all the turmoil and churn in the DVR industry right now, especially Tivo themselves, there's no way in hell I want to get tied down to any long term plan. For early adopters who got in 2-3 years ago, sure lifetime was the way to go. Now though? Doesn't seem wise. If Tivo as a company goes TU (tango upsilon) tomorrow, I'm out $24-36 bucks for use of their guide data and $40 for a wireless USB NIC..which I can use elsewhere.

    71. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

      You get 3 days of guide so you can record up to three days ahead and that's it, though you CAN do VCR-like recording and record by dates or schedule weekly recordings as well, but it works just like a VCR that way.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    72. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

      I like it just fine without the season passes. I can still pause live shows and record up to 3-days ahead or schedule VCR-like recording weekly/daily by time. I think it's an awesome option for someone not willing to shell out the monthly fee.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    73. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by bigpat · · Score: 1

      "So you want TiVo to be cheaper than you can build it yourself? How do expect that to happen? I mean really there is not that much margin on computer parts that they can make it up on volume. Yea I want a LearJet but I only want to pay $500 for it since I do not fly that often. Oh yea and I want it to get 40mpg as well. If you want Myth TV or Freevo cheaper than a TiVo I suggest you just wait a few months and hit Ebay for parts."

      I don't expect cheaper, but this article suggests you can put together a PVR/DVR yourself for around $200.

      http://graphics.tomshardware.com/video/20030731/

      I don't think expecting a manufacturer to put together a nicer package than I could for around the same amount of money is asking too much. Realisticially this could be a couple hours of labor for me, but a manufacturer would likely have a minimally paid people put these together in a couple minutes and I disagree that the margins on computer parts are so low that they couldn't make it up on volume.

      Chances are many people reading this have realized that buying a Dell or cheap PC is not much more expensive than putting together the parts yourself. A DVR is just a computer with limited functionality.

    74. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by oliphaunt · · Score: 1
      are there really THAT many people out there that pay the monthly fee, rather than the one time lifetime sub. fee?

      Well, yeah. at $13/month, a $300 lifetime sub costs the same as 2 years of service. If you buy a box today and spend that $300, you're basically making a bet that Tivo is still going to be around in 2 years and operating its business in a substantially similar way.

      I'm paying monthly, becuase I've done the math. The math says: tivo lost $32 million last year, and is sitting on assets of $63 million. So, at current subscription rates, Tivo has just enough assets to sustain themselves for two more years, if they lose as much as they did for the next two years in a row.

      'but wait,' you say! 'Tivo was cash-flow positive last year, for the first time EVER! This is a mark of them moving towards a profitable business!'

      unfortunately, this is only becuase they raised $75 million in Q104 by selling stock. The company is HEMMORHAGING money.

      yes, I'm just trying to justify my monthly fee. but I want to be clear that there are two camps- people who don't do the math, and think that $13/month forever is actually cheaper than the $300 up front... and people like me, who think Tivo will go out of business before they are able to provide me with the monthly equivalent of $300 worth of service.

      --




      Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
    75. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by slashfun · · Score: 0

      Well, ....yeah. But the hardware is so cheap there really isn't a good reason to NOT get into it. The subscription service is where the recurring cost is, and if they go out of business that goes away. I have five TIVOs, and four of them are less than one year old, and are the $99 model. Of course, I have upgraded the hard drives and put them all on a wired 100mbit network, but I would still consider my investment fairly cheap at this point.

      --

      Slashmail.org "The Open Source Email Company"

    76. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Cato · · Score: 1

      In the UK, Pacelink offer a cable that provides more reliable connection between the Sky (satellite) box) and the TiVo. Channel changing now works 100% of the time, which wasn't the case with IR.

    77. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by djtripp · · Score: 1

      I bought the lifetime subscription, back with my Sony series 1 dvr. When series 2 came out, there was an uproar from the early adopters, and they let us buy a series 2 and transfer the lifetime subscription to the series 2 box. I think I have had my tivo now for almost 5 years and I bought my lifetime subscription for $200, bringing my subscription to roughly $3.50 a month. So I gambled and I won. If you are not sure, then by all means, get the monthly service. My sister wishes she got the lifetime when She got my old TiVo which she has had for 2 years now, and at the time the life time sub was $250 i think.

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    78. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      Of course the only parts of the TiVo prone to failure are the hard drives and modem; the hard drive is replaceable, and the modem is circumventable. So you could say the effective lifetime of a TiVo unit is unlimited.

      Bwahahahaha! :)

      So is that why I had to have my DirecTiVo replaced twice before I finally got one that didn't die in 3-6 months? Wasn't the hard drive or the modem either time as well. First time was the power supply, 2nd was the tuner cards...

      That said, however, I love my TiVo :) It will be a shame if tivo goes away... :(

      --

      Place sig here.
    79. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

      I did the same math in the UK here, where it was (IO think) £10 a month, or £200 up front.

      I decided I would pay £400 for a 'smart VCR' in the end (£200 unit price, £200 lifetime sub) because I figured I'd get 20 months out of it. If not, I'd complain very loudly... :)

      Nearly 3 years on, it's had a new hard disk, but only for capacity reasons (and I waited until the 'break even' point to do that, just in case).

      If it dies now, I'll suck it up and use the box to make my own MythTV unit - it's looking like they have enough compelling features to make it worthwhile, but not enough to make me throw away my free TiVo service...

      And in the UK, SkyPlus is taking off - so the market is there, TiVo was just too soon!

      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
    80. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by bjb · · Score: 1
      With some model satellite receivers (DirecTV only, I think), the serial port on the back of the Tivo hooks up to the serial port on the back of the receiver and changes channels that way.

      Actually, there are some cable boxes that will work with the serial port as well.

      For the record, the TiVo can either do "IR Blasting" (two IR emitters that you can position) or serial port.

      From the TiVo's setup menu, you can select hundreds of different IR configurations, and for each one, you can either do slow, medium or fast. It sometimes will take you a while to get this just right, and you want the faster settings if at all possible (think: changes channels much faster). Of course, if you can get the serial connection to work, then that is best because there is no IR blaster setup and the response time is much faster.

      With all this IR blaster hack-ugliness, why have a TiVo? Because their device is much better than the Scientific Atlanta (Time Warner) and Motorola (RCN, Comcast) offerings.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    81. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Touche'

      I have DirecTiVo, so it's only $4.95 a month - and I get a second tuner. I should nmention that the other thing your probably missing (?) is TiVos suggestions. I find that, after a couple of months of usage, TiVo will manage a 3-4% hit ratio for programs I like, but woudn't have otherwise found. That may seem low, but it's probably 2-3 programs a week, which is more TV than I usually watch, if you exclude TWC and ESPNews.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    82. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

      I've been using the Tivo+ trial for a couple of weeks now, and I turned off the suggestions after a few days. #1, it was recording crap I knew about but didn't care about, #2 I barely have time to watch what I want to record, nevermind MORE crap -- that's why I have the Tivo in the first place, to watch shows I don't usually have time to watch.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    83. Re:don't have TiVo... Yet by firedeveloper · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who reads way to much /. and hasn't ever used a TiVo... I was hoping we could go a whole week without another TiVo is dead thread, but my hope was in vain. ::Owner of 3 TiVos, and a happy customer since 1999::

  2. About TiVo by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I work for TiVo.

    Believe me, it can be very disheartening to work for an innovator in a marketplace where large established companies have such control over the distribution channels.

    Cable companies and satellite companies already have a "lock" to a large extent on their customers and for them to sell an additional service such as a DVR requires so much less capital investment in marketing, and let's face it, making a good product, than it takes for a company like TiVo.

    And those companies already have much deeper pockets than a small company like TiVo with which to absorb the losses associated with pushing this rather expensive technology out to users.

    It's kind of funny to me that people will pay $80 cable bills without a whimper but will cry foul at the concept of paying $13 a month to TiVo to make the cable service so much more worthwhile.

    Cable DVRs suck. Most people would be much happier with a TiVo and would find the extra expense to be justified. I know I'm biased but I honestly believe that.

    My comments are my own and I do not speak for my employer.

    1. Re:About TiVo by mzwaterski · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The cable companies can more efficiently provide the same services that TiVo can provide. They haven't completely duplicated the service of TiVo yet but they have charged a heck of a lot less. What can TiVo provide that cable companies can't/don't that justifies the cost? No offense intended to you or TiVo of course.

    2. Re:About TiVo by otis+wildflower · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cable DVRs suck. Most people would be much happier with a TiVo and would find the extra expense to be justified. I know I'm biased but I honestly believe that.

      True, but...
      * I want a DVI+SPDIF/HDMI input and HD recording capability
      * I want faster menus and wishlist processing
      * I want nobody to ever mess with 30 second skip. DO NOT FUCK WITH 30 SECOND SKIP.
      * I want to be able to watch my TiVo recordings on my P800 fone and/or a video iPod
      * weather, stock, headline, etc. applets would be nice.

      Cable DVRs do suck, but they also do digital sound and hi-def. They don't handle DVD burning though, and I _may_ upgrade to a DVD-capable DVR in the next few months, remains to be seen whether it's a TiVo unit or some kind of HTPC Linux box..

    3. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cable DVRs suck"

      That's not really true. Comcast's newer dual tuner HD pvrs are pretty good and only cost i think $10 a month. That includes hardware! Tivos HD box, last i looked, was just under a grand, plus the $13/month on top of that.

    4. Re:About TiVo by natelr · · Score: 0

      It's kind of funny to me that people will pay $80 cable bills without a whimper but will cry foul at the concept of paying $13 a month to TiVo to make the cable service so much more worthwhile. Because like all technology thats is now getting on the pricey side. I pay $5 more to my cable company and have a DVR that can record duel channels (which you cant do with digital cable with a tivo) in high definition. I also do not have to shell out any additional cost and can upgrade for nearly free when anything better comes along. Tivo just cant compete with that.

    5. Re:About TiVo by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1, Interesting
      The problem as I see it is that TiVo doesn't seem to provide anything that a geek with a Linux box couldn't. Hence, it isn't really "guarded" against competition.

      Granted, TiVo has a much lower price point than, say, a small EPIA. But, for example, until July 1st, HDTV capture cards are available. And you can take a Linux PVR and do all sorts of neat stuff with it--add a RAID array, share the files over samba, etc.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    6. Re:About TiVo by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No offense taken.

      TiVo can provide technical innovation. Cable companies are generally not known for their ability to innovate technology or to produce compelling products such as set top boxes like TiVo with new and advanced features. They tend to "follow leads" as is obvious now with the crop of second-rate DVRs that they are releasing.

      We'll see how this plays out. Either the technical superiority of TiVo will win out or the lower-cost, lower-quality options that the cable companies can offer will win out. Actually it's likely that both will win and retain some part of the market, the question is, how large a part for each respectively?

      Believe me, no one at TiVo is under any delusions that we don't have to work *very hard* to stay ahead of the pack and retain technical superiority.

      I feel that especially on this topic, I have to remind everyone that I speak for myself and not TiVo.

    7. Re:About TiVo by RedX · · Score: 1
      What can TiVo provide that cable companies can't/don't that justifies the cost?

      Although not an apples-to-apples comparison, but I won't even consider going back to cable from DirecTV until cable can offer a DVR that can record 2 shows at once and also record HD content. Trust me, I'm terribly unhappy with the lack of feature updates coming from DirecTV for their TiVo boxes, and I'd jump back to cable as soon as a comparable offering was available.

    8. Re:About TiVo by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      I think the thing that really kills TiVO isn't necessarily the advertising or whatnot, it's the fact that cable/sattelite companies can charge only $5 or $10 a month for DVR, with no equipment to buy. There's really no way for TiVO to compete.

    9. Re:About TiVo by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those boxes work much more like a digital VCR than a true DVR as far as I know, although I have to admit I have never used one and can only go on others' observations here.

      Also you are providing evidence for at least some of my points - believe me there is no way that cable companies could push such *very expensive* technology as dual-tuner HD pvrs without the deep pockets that they have to absorb the losses that must be associated with that product. There is just no way that $10/month can support the development of, production of, and distribution of that product.

    10. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to buy a (new, supported) TiVo in the UK. Can I?

    11. Re:About TiVo by sulli · · Score: 1
      So quit locking down the content.

      TiVo where I have access to what I record would be useful. As it stands, my old Series 1 has died and I am almost certainly going with MythTV or EyeTV (Mac) because I will have access to what I have recorded. DRM'd Tivo To Go is garbage.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    12. Re:About TiVo by m2bord · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I completely see your point however, please let me tell you why I'll never own a Tivo or a Replay or any other system.

      I'm a control freak. I like to know what's going on and who's doing it.

      Tivo controls the box. They control the size of the drive inside the box, they control the data that's on the box, and they ultimately could control what can and cannot be saved onto the box.

      And while it is true that some can "hack" the box, Tivo has not given users permission to do so.

      Tivo alone maintains control and can upload updates on it, they upload commercials on to it, and they can monitor what I'm watching/Tivo-ing.

      In other words, I'm paying for a machine and a service which I cannot legally control.

      It's a funny thing but I really hate the idea of law-enforcement or anyone else out there being able to see how many times I Tivo'd something.

      Tivo is not the only company who operates this way. I'm sure most digital cable and satellite recievers operate under similar standards.

      But if I build my own box, and use open source software, I am free to see what's going on and thus gain some control.

      Tivo nor any other company that I know of, gives the consumer that option.

      --
      Is it 5:30 yet?
    13. Re:About TiVo by mzwaterski · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've never owned TiVo, only used it a few times. Does TiVo provide free updates to the UI/features that are useful on a regular basis?

      Part of my problem with TiVo is that it requires an upfront cost followed by a subscription cost. I know you can do the 300$ lifetime subscription, but thats TiVo's lifetime and currently things don't look that great. So I buy this box and a year later some new tech comes out (enter HDTV) and my box is no good. With the cable companies subscription plan, they absorb the cost of purchasing the new box. How can TiVo compete with that? Further, with the ever dropping price of home HTPC's how can TiVo compete? It seems that TiVo is just currently over-priced (not by choice) in the market.

    14. Re:About TiVo by bobpence · · Score: 1

      Comcast DVR is $10 a month. Except not really; it's $10 after paying $15 bucks for the digital cable box which was only useful to me for the TV listings that TiVo provides. Please stay in business, I might finally take the plunge after tax time. Frankly I think that the demand is quite elastic at this point so that a reduction in the monthly fee - to $10 say - would yield a larger total return within a year.

    15. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TiVo is a great product, maybe innovate a Linux OS in to it with just a good application for editing video/audio to remove advertising, and internet use for torrents & ftp, TiVo would really be rocking the world then:^)

    16. Re:About TiVo by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The costs associated with getting a product into retail channels are nothing to sneeze at. Also the costs associated with advertising these products is not cheap either. Cable companies don't have to put their products into retail channels and can advertise pretty much "for free" on their own service (not really for free since whatever time they use to advertise could have been used to make advertising revenue, except in those cases where they air their ads in the time slots that otherwise weren't bought).

      But I agree with your fundamental point that it's the subsidy that they can give to their customers in the monthly fee area and hardware that is most significant.

    17. Re:About TiVo by fruity_pebbles · · Score: 1

      How will you provide technical innovation on the current Tivo hardware? For example, TivoToGo is a great idea, but on the current hardware it's so slow that it's useless to a lot of people. Do you see the potential for innovation on the current hardware or does Tivo need a next-generation platform with more horsepower?

    18. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      ...have a DVR that can record duel channels

      You can record duel channels? Can you send me the Aaron Burr clip? Thanks.

    19. Re:About TiVo by smackjer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a Comcast DVR that is dual tuner, so it can record two shows at once, and it records HD. It has other features that Tivo does not, such as a Firewire port to offload content (which I haven't used yet so I can't really vouch for it). Best part: I didn't have to shell out ~$1000 for an HD-capable DVR, and since I don't have good enough line-of-sight for satellite, it's pretty much my only option for recording HD.

      It's only a matter of time before your local cable company has similar features.

      I also have a Series 2 Tivo, which has been relegated to bedroom duty, and had a Series 1 in the past. I have LOVED Tivo (both the product and the company) since 2001. Tivo's software is *slightly* easier to use than my Comcast DVR, but until they catch up in HD support they will lose ground.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    20. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't used them either, but they've gotten a pretty warm reception by some ex-Tivo users at the av science forum, and given that Tivo users are usually so nuts about the interface, I highly doubt that the thing is a dog.

      I think the boxes are Motorola, so they did the r+d, but what would be interesting to know is how much Comcast is paying motorola for them.

    21. Re:About TiVo by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      As a user of both a TiVo and a DVR from my Cable company, I can tell you that the Cable company's idea of what a DVR should do is ridiculous. The TiVo is a vastly superior product in every way, save one -- it cannot record digital cable natively.

      The designers of the Cable DVR are either a bunch of incredible fools, or could care less about the viewing experience of the customer (probably a little bit of both).

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    22. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunatly, most of your market doen't buy your product for "innovation" reasons.
      The cheaper alternative will win out, unless you can show everyone how much better Tivo is. iPod and Tivo are very similar in that they are top of the line stuff, so why is one everywhere and the other lacking? Apple marketed the iPod very well, and I know lots of people that have never even heard of Tivo. Now there are cable company boxes and stuff, so it's too late. For people that heard of DVRs from their cable company first, tivo is going to look like a copycat now. You're about to loose the market...

    23. Re:About TiVo by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      Can you give some more details on what you mean? What is an example of how TiVo is superior to cable DVR?

    24. Re:About TiVo by wwonka74 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps at some point TiVo could've decided to partner up with cable companies to provide TiVo's for their customers. I know TiVO did it w/ one of the satellite companies that's ditching them to run their own DVR's. Even if cable DVRs suck my present cable company can barely keep them in stock to meet the demand of new customers. For new technology customer's trust their entertainment providers more than they do some unknown to them company. It would not matter to the majority of cable customers if they received a TiVO DVR or a Motorola DVR from their cable company. Working against the companies that the customers have an inherent trust for is not how you are going to get your product out the door. I think you have already made your choice but really it's play ball with the companies with a "lock" on their customers or stay independent and hope for a wave to come in.

    25. Re:About TiVo by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      I'm on Rogers with the Scientific Atlanta 8300HD. It can record 2 HD shows simultaneously, with the ability to simultaneously play back an HD recording.

      Alternatively, I can record 1 show while watching another.

    26. Re:About TiVo by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      To be fair, cable co's are not generally known for their ability to deliver a one way analog signal particularly well, let alone two way digital. And yet people still pay $80 a month for a crappy service and worse customer service.

      I am a very happy satellite customer and would never consider cable ever again. I would rather not have television than deal with a cable company ever again. Thus far the sat co's attempts at rolling their own DVR's have been lackluster, and I hope they decide to stick with TiVo instead.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    27. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I'll add something to this...
      companies run by engineers never do well (with the exception of google... they suprised me) because they think "innovation" and a quality product is enough. Well, guess what? It doesn't mean jack if you don't market yourself well. Too bad too.

    28. Re:About TiVo by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't TiVo become a software company?

      Seriously, why doesn't TiVo license its cool interface and technology into the existing cable boxes? I would love it if my Comcast box had TiVo software on it, because TiVo knows how to write good software. Who cares what hardware it runs on?

      Also, I think TiVo should get into writing PVR software for PCs for hackers. Although, hackers hardly pay for anything, so maybe that's not such a good idea.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    29. Re:About TiVo by XMyth · · Score: 1

      There are cable DVRs that do this. Motorola makes one. I forget the model number, but it's out there.

    30. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... I pay $30 a month for Dish, and all the DVR equipment was free. I'm not going to buy a TiVo AND increase my monthly bill by almost 50% for incremental improvement.

      The article is right - if TiVo wants to survive, it absolutely *must* go where cable and satellite can't (for business reasons) go - to WAN/LAN-accessible content. If TiVo were to extend its reach beyond DVR to include more media center functionality (play a movie from the server in my basement, play these songs from that remove MP3 server, etc.), then it would once again be a must-have.

      Short of that, TiVo needs to do a *much* better job of positioning itself. For most consumers, "TiVo" means being able to pause/rewind live shows and record shows to an internal hard drive for later playback. Whether or not TiVo is actually more than that is completely beside the point because that's the *perception* that most consumers have. And, given that perception, TiVo adds no value above and beyond the sucky cable DVR.

    31. Re:About TiVo by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We'll see how this plays out. Either the technical superiority of TiVo will win out or the lower-cost, lower-quality options that the cable companies can offer will win out.

      As an Apple watcher for 20 years, I would say this: pack up your desk. Cheaper almost always wins in the marketplace; US consumers are trained to evaluate on price first, features second. The feature has to be really visible--visible in the Best Buy or WalMart floor space where the consumer makes their purchasing decision--for it to trump price. And your features aren't; you only see the value after use. That means either taking the plunge because you didn't know alternatives exist, or were pointed to it by a friend. Compared to the free advertising ComCast has on their own channels, good luck with that.

      While your product is stellar, and I'm a fanatic user myself, I think it takes too long for folks to appreciate the advantages of the TiVo. And, "too long", in this case, means >10 minutes. How do you market the advantages, without saying simply "easier to use"?

      I'm really hoping that the NetFlix deal can save your asses. I'm guessing it won't; it's too far away before release, it'll take too long to download stuff, and/or not enough stuff will be available. TivoToGo, while maybe nice (I dunno, I'm a Mac user), doesn't seem to be the killer feature, either: too long to transfer.

      I might suggest that you have some chance if you declare war on ComCast, since they didn't play ball with the distribution deal: allow for unrestricted copying/transfer/ad skip/archiving without ads, and only stop it if they come back to the table. That's pretty chancy, but it might the the only shot y'all have.

      Good luck--really. But if it all falls apart, please consider releasing enough info to keep the current boxes useful.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    32. Re:About TiVo by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      The trick is to get TiVo to make partnerships with the large cable companies to rent TiVo PVRs instead of (or in addition to) the ones they're currently renting.

    33. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want maximum strength checking too?

    34. Re:About TiVo by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

      I would guess that "geek with a Linux box" is a very small segment of TiVo's market. They're probably seeing a lot more competition with cable companies' set-top-box "DVR" functionality, which frankly sucks. And they're probably seeing some competition with Windows Media Center, too.

      As for HD capture cards, those currently only recieve over-the-air broadcasts, so you're stuck with network television, and not movie or other cable-only channels. And the cable companies aren't going to make it easy to pull HD content to an external machine, even if CableCard becomes more widespread.

      Clearly, a geek with MythTV can provide more functionality than TiVo or any other commercial offering, but there's the time factor (aka "how much is your time worth?"), which is TiVo's greatest strength: ease of installation and use.

    35. Re:About TiVo by XMyth · · Score: 1

      They don't care about what .0002% of their potential market can do otherwise. Especially when it will cost more money to do it your way.

    36. Re:About TiVo by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Got it already, but I would like to save a bit more on my car insurance...

    37. Re:About TiVo by Kombat · · Score: 1

      It's a funny thing but I really hate the idea of law-enforcement or anyone else out there being able to see how many times I Tivo'd something.

      It's a funny thing when people are so full of delusional self-importance that they think anybody out there gives a sh*t what TV shows they're watching or what books they're checking out of the library or what route they're taking to work.

      You are not nearly as important as you think. Law enforcement agencies have far more important things to do than track some nobody like you out of sheer curiousity, or some clandestine random monitoring program. Get over yourself. Even if the government could track all your cell phone calls to 1-900 numbers, they wouldn't bother unless they were already watching you for some (most likely perfectly legitimate) reason.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    38. Re:About TiVo by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I am of the complete opposite mind-set. While I do not subscribe to digital cable (network channels and high speed internet access are what I want) I think it is a much better product then Satellite.

      I had Dish Network.

      1)they have poor installation (they just dropped wire in the middle of my living room floor, instead of putting it behind the walls). They installed my satellite on my neighbors roof
      2)Their services DOES go out when it is bad weather, and bad does not really have to be a major storm
      3)They lack customer service skills imho. When I had problems they always tried getting me off the phone, and then their next response "you will have to contact a local authorized dealer who will come out at their given rates."

      4) They charge an arm & leg for their boxes and once you bought it, god forbid if it breaks. With cable tv:
      1) They wire behind your walls
      2) If the service goes out they come and fix it (no charge to you)
      3) Unless your wires are faulty - bad weather RARELY (less then 1% for me) affects your connection

      4) High speed cable modems are way bettr then DSL...and satellite high speed is a joke.

      Though I will admit, comcast lacks in service and reliability as far as sending people out - and I always end up spending HOURS on the phone, and long hassles and delays...a lot of undue stress.
      5) If the box breaks due to it being faulty (as opposed to you breaking it) they fix it. Frankly, I don't even use the box (in philly they REQUIRE you to have a box even if you are not on a digital plan which is lame.)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    39. Re:About TiVo by Algan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem as I see it is that TiVo doesn't seem to provide anything that a geek with a Linux box couldn't.

      A $100 price point and that "works out of the box" experience.

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    40. Re:About TiVo by Moofie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm a TiVo user, and I think the box rocks.

      However.

      I don't pay $80/mo for cable. I pay $40, and $13 to TiVo to download a program guide to me. That's a lot of money for a very little bit of data. That's about eight nice, glossy magazine subscriptions per year. Never mind the hoops I had to jump through to not use your expensive dial-in PoP. (I had to go borrow a landline for a long time to get the software update) I got it working, but that out-of-the-box experience just sucked.

      I would have much rather paid for the box outright, and given TiVo a reasonable profit, than die the death of a thousand $13/mo payments. I'm willing to pay for a good user experience, but I hate the feeling that I'm being nibbled to death by just one more monthly fee.

      And, no, the lifetime subscription is simply not an option. It's a terrible value, especially because I'm not sanguine about TiVo inc's future.

      I like your product, but I'm not responsible to make your business model work for you. I'll be a customer for as long as I get good value, and right now your value proposition is sketchy at best. I really hope you guys can change this.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    41. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bryan,

      I hope TiVo survives and prospers, somehow, in some fashion. It's neat stuff.

      That said, I "installed" an SA DVR box from my cable provider the first of the year. I have an excellent, custom built HT system. I have VCRs integrated to it, but the quality of even my S-VHS units was just not good enough for a 61" HDTV display.

      We debated TiVo for some time and finally went with the DVR from the cable folks. I unboxed it and had it integrated to the system, including the Harmony Remote in 20 minutes. It works quite well. My non-techie wife (the reason I own a Harmony!) has set up all her favorite shows and drives the DVR like she invented it.

      And believe it or not, my cable bill actually went DOWN...a whole $1.38, but it is less.

      Now, this is not totally perfect. Yes, the dual-HD tuners work, but under load...both tuners recording HDTV signals and watching a 3rd, I've actually seen some noise and other artifacts in the output. Not enough to bother, but visible just the same.

      Regardless, it'd be real hard for me to remmove the SA DVR and switch to TiVo or anything else. It works better than a VCR (our original need), everyone in the house can use it...well...and the cost is reasonable.

      Best of luck..........

    42. Re:About TiVo by branchingfactor · · Score: 1

      Yes, cable companies are not known for their ability to innovate. That's not their business model. They wait for other companies to offer new capabilities (cable modems, program guides, on-demand cable, DVRs) and then buy them.

      It sounds like Tivo employees are deluded about how cable companies work, when DVRs became a commodity item, what consumers want, and how much they are willing to pay for it. Not good.

    43. Re:About TiVo by ajnsue · · Score: 1

      TiVo is great technology. But without any changes it will be suppplanted by cheaper more conveniet service from the cable/Sat providers. I suspect that a strong shot of glamour would help. TiVos today fade into the wall of consumer electronics. If they could focus on a sexier image - like a MacMini or iPod for the TV. TiVo could become a style statement.

    44. Re:About TiVo by Moofie · · Score: 1

      If you guys are in the (software) innovation business, then why the heck are you trying to sell boxes at Best Buy? Why on EARTH did you allow DirecTV and Comcast to get away without licensing your software?

      Those decisions seemed absolutely insane to me.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    45. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the business justification for allowing people to hack into your hardware? To engender goodwill in a few thousand geeks? How much more in customer support costs do you think a company will incur if they allowed users the option to tinker with the equipment? Sure, companies can just say that they will only service unmodified equipment, but do you really think there aren't people out there who would abuse this?

      I realize the tone of my comment may be a little grating, but I don't mean for it to be. I'm seriously asking what sort of profitable business model is available for companies who wish to do something like letting their customers hack away. If there is one, then why hasn't any company tried it?

    46. Re:About TiVo by wcrowe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. TiVo handles the "season pass" better. If I set up a season pass to always record a show, the TiVo gets it, even if the network changes the air time. My cable DVR often misses shows for this reason. Sometimes it just doesn't record shows for no reason whatsoever.

      2. Fast forward works better with TiVo. While fast-forwarding, when I hit the play button, the TiVo automatically backs up a few seconds, then plays, i.e., it takes into account the lag time between the moment my brain comprehends that I'm at the point I want to watch, and when the button-press is executed. This is particularly good when zipping through ads. The cable DVR stops right at the point play is executed, so I'm always missing the first few seconds after a commercial break.

      3. The TiVo has a "wishlist" capability. I can tell it to find all movies which are "historical dramas", for example, or all "dog shows", or every show with "Danny DeVito" in it, and it will give me a list of those programs to select to record. The cable DVR doesn't even let me search for shows by title, let alone keyword.

      4. Overall, the TiVo interface is much more user-friendly. The cable device seems to assume that what I want to do is watch TV all night long, and that I might want to hit the record button on something while I'm watching it.

      There are others.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    47. Re:About TiVo by Canuck_TV · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cable companies are generally not known for their ability to innovate technology or to produce compelling products such as set top boxes like TiVo with new and advanced features

      tee hee. Thanks for the morning laugh. You've obviously been at Tivo too long. What the cable companies have done with their little one-way coax network defies belief... Trust me. I work for one (sort of... long story). Try to find another single service provider who can give you everything the cable plant does on 2 conductors. Cable (analog/digital), VOD, Broadband, VoIP, FM radio, other misc data services (ie Alarm monitoring) ... Not even the telcos can touch that (for the moment - they're getting DAMN close)

      However, the lack of a decent set-top box on our own network (Rogers, Canada) is frustrating. Its far superior to the dish folks - dual tuners, and the ability to record VOD programming etc. However, the user interface is lacking these days... And that I blame entirely on the manufacturers. In our case, Scientific Atlanta. They keep innovating - using the same software. For instance, the new SA 8500 (i think?) box that is coming out will be able to serve video off its hard drive to any other SA set-top... ANY explorer set top. That's saying something. The exlorer 2000 is one outdated piece of kit. But guess what, its still supported by the latest feature sets.

      PowerKey is the base, but SARA - the top-level GUI, looks like somethiing out of 1994. It is so long overdue for an overhaul I've generally stopped complaining about it.

      That being said, the SA boxes have one SERIOUS advantage over other solutions - they're a bit bucket. When you record the NFL game in HD on an 8000HD, it is simply caching the stream. No transcoding. When you play it back, the signal is identical to the live broadcast. So... until CableCard 2.0 comes out (ETA: 12 months?) TiVo and others are left in a bit of a lurch. But, if you survive the wait, there will be NO excuse for giving the cablecos a run for their money. I hope you do. Maybe SA will finally update SARA!

    48. Re:About TiVo by BCole · · Score: 1

      If my HD Tivo had a DVD burner on it, it would be perfect.

    49. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They haven't completely duplicated the service of TiVo yet but they have charged a heck of a lot less.

      Charged less? That's a good one! I'm paying Comcast $56/mo here in Philadelphia for expanded basic ANALOG cable. That means no premium channels, and I don't get my internet service through them, either. I've had cable since 1994, and the rates have only gone up. You must have digital cable for the DVR functions, and that's even more expensive.

      Contrast that with TiVo. In January of 2002 I bought the box, and coughed up another $250 for the lifetime subscription, which was the same as two years of service at the monthly rate. So since January of 2004, TiVo hasn't charged me one red cent for their service. Even if you factor in the initial hardware cost, the TiVo is still a cheaper option than paying $x/mo indefinitely for DVR functions.

      Your assertion that the cable companies are doing it cheaper is pure, unadulterated bullplop, but it's what I'd expect from the average cheap, short-sighted American. I, however, am not an average American-- I looked at the big picture and saw that forking over a couple hundred bucks once was better than paying $x/month forever.

      The megacorps are bleeding you idiots dry with their recurring revenue that you think is cheaper and better.

    50. Re:About TiVo by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I think the thing that really kills TiVO isn't necessarily the advertising or whatnot, it's the fact that cable/sattelite companies can charge only $5 or $10 a month for DVR, with no equipment to buy. There's really no way for TiVO to compete."

      True, but, I think you can get into a lot more trouble if you crack into the case of the rented dvr box like you can do with a Tivo...at add extra functionality, and the like.

      If they'll get to the point to where you can have Tivo AS your cablebox....(the new cable cards?), then, I think they'll have an advantage in that more 'normal' consumer mkt.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    51. Re:About TiVo by m2bord · · Score: 1

      well i've seen enough episodes of law and order and CSI to know that any record you leave behind can be pulled and while I'm not a criminal nor plan to be, i don't want anyone to know what i'm doing.

      and you inflammatory approach, suggesting that those who are concerned about their privacy are full of "delusional self-importance" is off-base.

      the question is how much authority are you willing to give up.

      i, for one, am tired of buying products that i don't own.

      if i pay money for something, i have this belief that i should control it and what it does.

      --
      Is it 5:30 yet?
    52. Re:About TiVo by Hittman · · Score: 1

      It's kind of funny to me that people will pay $80 cable bills without a whimper but will cry foul at the concept of paying $13 a month to TiVo to make the cable service so much more worthwhile.

      When people ask me about it, I ask them "would you pay $13 a month for to have a TV channel that always has something you like on it, whenever you want to watch it, with no commercials?

      Cable DVRs suck. Most people would be much happier with a TiVo and would find the extra expense to be justified. I know I'm biased but I honestly believe that.

      I have no connection to Tivo, other than being a long time user, and agree completely. I had Time Warner's Scientific Atlanta box in my home for three weeks before I called and demanded they remove it immediately. I gave back 40 channels of digital music and 50 hours of recording capacity with two tuners for my little single tuner, 15 hour Tivo. The TW box was that bad. I was amazed that they could pack that much suck into just one box.

      How badly did it suck? Let me count the ways.

    53. Re:About TiVo by radish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's good to speak to someone from Tivo - I'm a big fan.

      I used to live in the UK (where Tivo have to all intents and purposes closed down) and was one of the few die hard Tivo'ers. I had my box, hacked in a bigger HD, added the network card, TivoWeb, etc etc. When Sky+ came along I defended Tivo to the hilt - it _was_ better. The menus were better, the season passes worked better, it was much more friendly to non-techs.

      So anyway, now I live in the US. I have cable TV (satellite isn't available in my building) and a cable PVR. Why don't I have a Tivo? Bunch of reasons:

      No HD
      No 5.1
      Single tuner
      Upfront cost is ~$200 vs $0
      Monthly cost is $13 vs $10 (not a biggy)

      Now I fully understand the technical reasons Tivo can't support HD, or multiple tuners (though digital audio seems easy). But as a user it's really hard to justify paying more for a box which doesn't do as much. Yes Tivo still wins out on interface, reliability, etc - but that isn't enough.

      To Tivo: I wish you all the best, I would buy a Tivo in a heartbeat if it fixed the HD, audio and multiple tuner problems, but until then I can't see much of a future.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    54. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ****LOVE**** TiVo. You can take it from my cold, dead hands.

      TiVo forever!!

    55. Re:About TiVo by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Tell your bosses to quit being such pussies. 30 second skip? No.

      Your customers really want (even if they don't know it) a feature that once they push the "this is a commercial button", Tivo looks back until it finds a blank frame, then goes forward til it finds the first frame of the offender, takes a hash of it, and forever blocks that same commercial from showing. It can look for the ending blank frame too, so that the commercial never shows. Then have that Tivo upload the hashes, and distribute them nationwide.

      The only problem is a technical one. We'd all see commercials so infrequently, that we'd forget which button to push on the remote to flag them...

    56. Re:About TiVo by Canuck_TV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      'm guessing it won't; it's too far away before release, it'll take too long to download stuff, and/or not enough stuff will be available

      I couldn't agree more. The days of "Don't release till it works 100% with full feature set," are, unforunately, gone. The world simply works too fast now. 15 minutes of fame has become 15 seconds. Do something big, but get the basic feature set working. Make sure the hardware can do what you plan on doing. Make sure you hype it. Then sell it, with a promised free upgrade in 6 months.

      This is what happened to me with Apple - too late. Back in 2000, we had to make a decision on a non-linear editing platform system-wide. 13 stations, with about 3-7 edit systems required per station. We decided to go with the industry standard AVID... On the PC platform. OSX simply wasn't there yet. I'd saw off my left foot to switch now. AVID works on Mac. It STARTED on Mac. But a decision had to be made. Too late.

      I hate this new reality. I'd rather see solid, tested, products. But people have become GIMMEITNOW, and therefore first to market with a reasonably stable product wins. Oh well.

    57. Re:About TiVo by RaboKrabekian · · Score: 1

      Cable DVRs suck. Most people would be much happier with a TiVo and would find the extra expense to be justified. I know I'm biased but I honestly believe that.

      I currently have the DVR that Time Warner offers as part of their digital cable package. I pay about $9 a month for it. I considered a Tivo for a long time, and you're right that I'd probably be happier with it. Unfortunately the difference wasn't worth the difference in price. Through the cable company the box was free and the service only $9. With Tivo I would have had to buy the box and pay more for the service, or pay a large "lifetime" subscription fee. Tivo may have the better product, but it's not so much better that it's worth that much more money to me.

      For what it's worth I've been very happy with the Time Warner box. I got it before it was advertised and initially had some problems with the box being faulty. They patched it over the cable line and since then it's been fantastic. It doesn't have a lot of the advanced features of Tivo, but it does what it says and does it well.

      --
      "Moderate drinking can help prevent amputated limbs" -- Abigail Zuger, NYTimes, 12/31/02
    58. Re:About TiVo by gathas · · Score: 1
      US consumers are trained to evaluate on price first, features second.

      This is certainly true in consumer electronics and computers. Not so much so with items like cars. Is this because of the rapid improvement at a reduced cost in consumer electronics (mostly computer related) from generation to generation? People seem to be willing to spend extra money for cars with alot of frosting as opposed to just a mundane people mover.

    59. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tivo does have this option. It's called TivoBasic. I bought a pioneer Tivo DVD Recorder because it included basic Tivo service without a monthly fee. However, that's where the benefits stoped. After using it for a while I decided to upgrade to a wireless adapter only to find that 1) 802.11g wasn't supported 2) More importantly, you have to sacrifice your wireless security because Tivo won't get their act together and support WPA.

      Then, I was looking for a way to stream music from my computer. Tivo expected me to pay the $300 lifetime subscription (or $13/month) for the "privilege" of paying another $100 for the home media option (back before it was bundled with TivoPlus). So $400 ($300 now) for NO additional service, just some extra software. I can get a standalone music streaming box for $150.

    60. Re:About TiVo by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Comcast DVR is $10 a month. Except not really; it's $10 after paying $15 bucks for the digital cable box which was only useful to me for the TV listings that TiVo provides."

      This is kind of how I justified my Tivo purchase a couple years ago. I was paying extra for Cox digital cable...I found it just wasn't worth it. I didn't really watch the extra channels that much (why do they need so freaking many tv shopping networks?)...and the reception wasn't that great. It would consistantly pixelate into those annoying blocks..etc. I dropped it and went back to regular analog cable with no box. I took the extra $$'s I saved to basically make the payments for a year on a no interest for a year deal at Best Buy...and with my Xmas money I got...paid the one time lifetime subscription. Basically, after that first year of non-digital savings..paid for the box...2nd year..paid for the lifetime subscription.

      Frankly, I don't see HDTV becoming that prevalent anytime soon...I've got a 60' Mitsubishi analog tv that still has a great picture...the HD tv's of that size haven't come down in price yet...so, I'm not really in any hurry to have to have HD recording...or digital signal coming in. Years ago...I had satellite..it was great, but, everywhere else I've moved over the past 5 years have not had a clear shot at the sky for satellite signals...

      I'm building a MythTV box right now for fun...and will get an HDTV card (hell, 3 or 4 of them) before they quit selling the non-DRM's ones...but, just to experiment with, and hold onto till HDTV really becomes a 'reality' for the masses...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    61. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would the international market factor into the subscription model?

      As long as Tivo cannot be used with a string attached, there is no room for international markets where the cable companies have no influence. The Tivo sales would sky-rocket if they think outside the box!

    62. Re:About TiVo by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Insightful
      TivoToGo can be saved with one feature:

      Let me download an MPEG2 file which I can burn with any DVD burning program

      Not that DRM-protected file you give me, and not something I can only legally use Sonic MyDVD 6.1 on. Something I can feed to Nero without dancing through illegal hoops on.

      Let's be honest - no one gives a crap about spending two hours to download a one hour show. We want to burn them to DVD. Period. And we don't want to futz with MythTV, we want to do it with a piece of hardware we can get at Best Buy.

      Please, say to hell with the companies that would be offended by this. If you have millions of customers you would have the money to do a court battle.

    63. Re:About TiVo by radiumhahn · · Score: 1

      Bryan, Here is how Tivo wins... open source APIs and Shell access to the Tivo. Lets the hackers write their p2p software for their networked Tivo. Let the Tivo play video stored on the network. Put big scary disclaimers to protect the company, but make it easy for hackers to innovate... Cable companies don't let you hack inside their boxes and on the wire without involving the FBI or police. Tivo can do this... its just a matter of being smart about it and doing it in a hurry. If you want to win then simply do what every computer geek wants... honestly... you're selling hardware and a little bit of software. Shell Access... Open APIs... Let sports illustrated integrate SI.com w/ Tivo... Let joe schmoe make his play a random home video clip... Let suse download a google gmail utility for Tivo.

    64. Re:About TiVo by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      I work for TiVo.

      Increase your potential market by 10%! 30 million new potential customers!

      Add Canadian content!

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    65. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have TiVo and I love it for all the reasons that you list.

      The only problem with it is that now I watch more TV than I used to because I have an easier time finding and recording shows that I want to see.

    66. Re:About TiVo by erkdaap · · Score: 1

      I have been a TiVo customer for 2-3 years now, paying the monthly fee, and before that had a Dish receiver with Ultmate TV built into it, which was actually comparable to Tivo/cable (when the weather didn't suck). I am now a Charter customer, and their on-demand service is NOTHING like TiVo at all. If TiVo's dying, I'll go down with the ship. Their service is so superior to anythign else I've used/seen, and I can't live without the ability to pause/rewind/record television. Er, I can live but not as a TV viewer. The $13/month fee is trivial as Bryan says, compared to my $100/month cable/internet bill. I need to be able to sit down at night whenever I'm ready to watch the tube and be able to select from 10-15 different episodes of Malcolm or Seinfeld. :-) Anyway, long live TiVo.

    67. Re:About TiVo by vondo · · Score: 1
      Cable DVRs suck. Most people would be much happier with a TiVo and would find the extra expense to be justified. I know I'm biased but I honestly believe that. For $10 extra per month (only $5 if you consider that I was renting an HDTV cable box for $5), I get a dual tuner box from Comcast that records in HD, has firewire/DVI outputs, and stores more TV than I can watch in a week. Sure, the interface isn't Tivo, but:

      1. I didn't pay anything up front
      2. Tivo doesn't have a non-DirectTV HD box as far as I know
      3. The Direct TV box is $1000 or so
      4. When I want something different in a year or two, I'll swap what I've got
      5. The interface is slowly improving

      For some people, Tivo+Cable makes sense. For others of us, it doesn't. I wish Tivo and Comcast had come to an arrangement because I'd gladly pay a couple of bucks more per month to have something a little nicer, but I don't want to give up HD recording.

    68. Re:About TiVo by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had Dish Network
      Respectfully...try DirecTV

      1)they have poor installation (they just dropped wire in the middle of my living room floor, instead of putting it behind the walls). They installed my satellite on my neighbors roof
      Installation is done by independent technicians, and it sounds like you had a lousy one...I know from experience this is true of both satellite and cable installers.

      2)Their services DOES go out when it is bad weather, and bad does not really have to be a major storm
      Again, sounds like your installer didn't do the job properly. Either connections outside aren't sealed or more likely your dish isn't really aligned very well.

      3)They lack customer service skills imho. When I had problems they always tried getting me off the phone, and then their next response "you will have to contact a local authorized dealer who will come out at their given rates."
      Can't really say much about DirecTV's customer service, but I also haven't had a need to call them more than once in over 2 years. The service just works.

      4) They charge an arm & leg for their boxes and once you bought it, god forbid if it breaks.
      The beauty of satellite is you can choose to buy *quality* equipment, not the 3rd rate crap that the Cable Co's force on you. If you buy cheapo stuff and it breaks, well you get what you pay for. Also you can buy the feature you *want* instead of just what they want to give you.



      With cable tv:

      1) They wire behind your walls
      Installer issue again.

      2) If the service goes out they come and fix it (no charge to you)
      With satellite, generally anything that's 'wrong' is fixable by *you*. No waiting on a tech if you are even moderately 'handy'. Aligning a dish isn't hard (assuming it's not on your roof *smile*). But there isn't anything between you and the signal, unlike cable where the tech might be down the street just unplugging every connection till he finds the house he wants...I've watched them do that trying to figure out which was my line...sheesh.

      3) Unless your wires are faulty - bad weather RARELY (less then 1% for me) affects your connection
      *Your wires* being the key phrase. It's also every wire over every mile between you and the cable co, lots of places for faults to occur that you have no control over.

      4) High speed cable modems are way bettr then DSL...and satellite high speed is a joke.
      How did DSL get into this? In this one area I must give credit to Cox Cable where it's due, the cable internet 'just works'. Excepting the one time they oversold the node, I've never had much in the way of problems. Just plug and go, it's that easy. I'd love to try DSL but the distance limits have always prevented my getting a signal.

      Satellite is hands down better than any cable co I've ever used, and that totals 6-8 different providers/locations.


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    69. Re:About TiVo by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      Please do not extrapolate anything I have said to any other employees of TiVo or the company itself. I stated very clearly that I speak for myself only.

      I did not say that cable companies' business model is to innovate. I said that not having to innovate means that they don't have the same cost in providing solutions. They can only provide solutions which are behind the technical curve, but they can provide them more cheaply because of that.

      This is all a generality though. There's nothing to say that TiVo couldn't provide both better and cheaper solutions by simply working harder and smarter.

      Once again, I speak for myself and not TiVo or any other employee of TiVo.

    70. Re:About TiVo by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Cable DVRs suck. Most people would be much happier with a TiVo and would find the extra expense to be justified."

      I'd love some justification for that statement.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    71. Re:About TiVo by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How exactly are "VOD, Broadband, VoIP, FM radio, other misc data services (ie Alarm monitoring)" innovations of cable companies?

      Cable companies were simply in the fortunate position to be able to re-purpose infrastructure that they had already laid down for another purpose (analog TV distribution). And the repurposing that they did took extra investment in digital set top boxes and cable modem hardware, and who knows whatever infrastructure at their head end. No innovation there at all. It's not like they "invented" the internet or any service thereon that by happy coincidence for them have added value to their service.

      DirecTV with TiVo DVRs have all of the advantages that you mentioned about the SA boxes, and they're better DVRs to boot.

      I speak for me and not TiVo again (obviously).

    72. Re:About TiVo by iowannaski · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Tivo failed miserably in the marketing department,

      The verb "tivo" is firmly established in the American lexicon. I'd hardly call that a failure of marketing.

      Tivo's financial problems can all be directly traced back to thei strategy of, "sell the unit at a loss, make it up on volume."

      TiVo puts nice software on top of their commodity hardware platform, but they haven't done anything significant to put them ahead of the imitators.

      --
      i forget
    73. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TiVo is a great product (I've had a series-1, a DirecTiVo and now have a Series-2 and Humax DVR).

      I think TiVo should get aggressive with its comparison to the the benefits of TiVo vs. the Cable DVRs. I used a TW Scientific-Atlandta DVR and it blows, but most folks don't know any better (I know, I spoke with them while waiting 50 minutes in line to return the crappy DVR at the TimeWarner office). Show how easy it is to setup a season pass on Tivo, then TW. Then show what happens when the stupid networks time-shift their shows 5 minutes. Or move a show to a new time slot.

      The other two suggestions:

      1. Get a CableCard version of Tivo/DVD Burner out now. I know it is planned for 2006, but you guys are missing the boat here. The horrible cable-box/IR requirement makes Tivo much harder to use as more and more cable companies go digital.

      2. Get your subscription price $10/mo. I bought a lifetime on my Series-2, but I'm actually doing monthly on my Humax because $6.95 is cheap enough (figuring it would take me almost 3 years to pay for the lifetime and I would probably upgrade by then).

    74. Re:About TiVo by vondo · · Score: 1
      I don't understand what you are talking about. If you have a DVR, you should just be paying for the service plus $10 for the box.

      What I pay:

      • ~$45 for Expanded basic cable
      • ~$15 for Digital cable channels (optional)
      • $10 for the DVR
      • HD channels are included with the SD channels in expanded basic
    75. Re:About TiVo by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ...very few understand what exactly it does besides "record, stop live tv". Tivo failed miserably in the marketing department...
      Absolutely correct. "Pause live TV" is probably one of the least important feature, because this device pretty much destroys your taste for live TV. During the six months between my box's arrival and its final failure (QA is another issue Tivo never properly addressed) I stopped even looking at the TV schedule, because I was more likely to find something I wanted to watch already recorded. Even when I did watch a live show, I'd wait at least 5 minutes after it started, so I could zip past the commercials.

      The best feature of Tivo, the one the makes it worth the (rather high) cost is its ability to find shows for you. I'd come home saying, "I want to watch a nature documentary" and find that Tivo had already recorded a half dozen, including a couple I didn't even know were on. Judging from what I've heard from other Tivo owners, this is a universally popular feature. Yet they never advertised it at all.

    76. Re:About TiVo by Washizu · · Score: 1

      "The cable companies can more efficiently provide the same services that TiVo can provide."

      Comcast charges about $10/month for their DVR in my area.

      --
      OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    77. Re:About TiVo by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      TiVo handles the "season pass" better. If I set up a season pass to always record a show, the TiVo gets it, even if the network changes the air time. My cable DVR often misses shows for this reason. Sometimes it just doesn't record shows for no reason whatsoever.
      My Time Warner DVR has never screwed this up. Ever. For a while, Good Eats was bouncing all over the schedule, and I never missed a single new episode.
      The cable DVR doesn't even let me search for shows by title, let alone keyword.
      While I can't search by title or genre, I can browse by title or genre.
    78. Re:About TiVo by jbarr · · Score: 1

      Bryan,

      Thanks for your input! One problem that I see is that even if a "technical innovator" partners with the likes of a Cable company, it's still the Cable company who ultimately calls the shots. Take, for example, Digeo's new MOXI DVR box. Though it does have its shortcomings, overall, I think it's an excellent DVR choice. It offers great features, has a decent UI, works very well, and has a very attractive price point. (Note: My comparison comes from 5 years as a ReplayTV owner.)

      The double-edged sword is that Digeo designed the product to be extremely "feature-tailorable" by the Cable companies. On one hand, this allows them to very easily penetrate a larger market. That's great, but on the other hand, you then have decisions by the likes of Charter who decided things like the "Skip" button will jump 15 MINUTES ahead instead of the originally deployed 30 seconds. This was due to an "executive decision on Charter's part." Once again, the tail wagging the dog.

      I certainly hope that "TiVo's Death Watch" ends up being nothing more than journalistic novelty because I too think TiVo is very technologically inovative and has lots of potential. How well all the players play together will ultimately determine TiVo's fate.

      -Jim
      MoxiTips.com

      P.S. After looking at your /. number, it's very cool to see that you are part of /.'s "Under 1000" club! I'm not THAT far behind! ;-)

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    79. Re:About TiVo by hawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >As an Apple watcher for 20 years, I would say this: pack up your desk.

      Yeah. I remember Apple. Pity they went out of business :)

      More seriously, if they spend as long going out of business as Apple has, he can pack *very* slowly.

      hawk

    80. Re:About TiVo by Cromac · · Score: 1
      Also, I think TiVo should get into writing PVR software for PCs for hackers. Although, hackers hardly pay for anything, so maybe that's not such a good idea.

      They could go after the same market that Snapstream and Sage TV have. Enough people are buying those products to keep the companies in business, if Tivo could write software that matched their DirecTV Tivo (what I have) for the PC they would surely be able to sell it.

    81. Re:About TiVo by m2bord · · Score: 1

      i'm not sure where you got your information from but there's little cost involved. a court ordered subpoena to tivo for the records related to my customer# is all it takes. tivo then either faxes or emails the information back. we've all seen the RIAA and MPAA do it ad they aren't law enforcement. but i'm unclear on what part you are confused about. i don't want anyone to know what i'm doing at anytime. period. that holds for my wife, my parents, my siblings, anyone. it's a personal preference and it's not because i'm hiding something.

      --
      Is it 5:30 yet?
    82. Re:About TiVo by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      Me too. I used to hate TV, now I almost have too much to watch.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    83. Re:About TiVo by fm6 · · Score: 1
      It's a funny thing when people are so full of delusional self-importance that they think anybody out there gives a sh*t what TV shows they're watching or what books they're checking out of the library or what route they're taking to work.
      It's not "delusional self-importance" to worry about getting declared an "enemy combatant" and having your civil rights suspended. This is not a theoretical event, it's actually happened to thousands of people, including a few U.S. citizens.

      Even if the Bush administration weren't trying so hard to find loopholes in the Bill of Rights, allowing the FBI to randomly monitor library records is a very bad thing indeed. They have a long track record of coming down on people simply because they have "dangerous" views. If ones choice of reading matter is enough to put you under suspicion, people will be very careful what they read. Not something you want in a free society.

    84. Re:About TiVo by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      he iPod is a hit,why? Advertising!

      I don't believe that's correct. I think it's because you can pick it and see the difference in 5 mins or less at an Apple Store, or anywhere else that they're on display. The display requirements for the TiVo, OTOH, are too much--so they sit in a box with a brochure. Consumers Don't Read.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    85. Re:About TiVo by hawk · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've never owned TiVo, only used it a few times. Does TiVo provide free updates to the UI/features that are useful on a regular basis?

      Not only free, but they happen automatically.

      From time to time, you end up with downloads of updated software. This tends to be piecemeal for regular tivos that get it by phone, and all at once on satellite. If it needs to, it reboots at some obscure time of the morning (I think it even worns you first).

      As far as competing with cable, look at their deal with directv (which may or may not be ending, depending upon which rumors you believe). Someone is subsidizing hardware costs ($99), and it's only $5/month. And look at the portion (huge majority) of tivo subscribers with directivo . . .

      hawk

    86. Re:About TiVo by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      I want my DVR (which I have from my cable company) to do three things:

      1. Record all of my shows...
      2. ...in High Definition if available
      3. Let me download what I recorded to my computers

      It does 1 and 2 and it has 20 hours of storage (80 for non HD shows). That's all the storage I need, and for $6 a month I'm not complaining.

      It won't let me download (silly copyright thing I suppose :-)), that's the only caveat. I own a video capture card so I can hook it up to that if I need to save stuff, it's a nuisance but it works. Still, 2 out of 3 aint bad.

      Please tell me one thing TiVo offers beyond this that makes it worthwhile.

    87. Re:About TiVo by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      They haven't completely duplicated the service of TiVo yet but they have charged a heck of a lot less.

      My Tivo was 100 bucks. I've got 70 gig of disk in there, some ram, and so on. If Tivo dies, the hardware is worth all of that, easily. And Tivo service adds 5 bucks a month to my satellite bill. 5 bucks. I can't see how "a heck of a lot less" can possibly enter the equation when we're talking 12 cents a day to start with.

      My sister has a PVR on her cable TV - it's OK, but it misses the critical features that make Tivo useful to me. I don't have to know or care when (or if) something I'll like is on, it records it for me, and there's always somethign to watch. I haven't watched live TV for anything but (rarely) news in years.

      As far as holding off to see if Tivo dies - you can't use an IDE drive or two? I assure you, if they do die, within days there will be sites dedicated to turning a Tivo into a standalone computer, probably others with free guide feeds, and so on.

      If you want one, don't wait, buy it. Worst case (for Tivo) would suck, but it wouldn't be all that bad for you with the box.

    88. Re:About TiVo by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      While the idea of automatically removing commercials is a good one, this suggested implementation is just dumb.

      --
      i forget
    89. Re:About TiVo by hawk · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you've got a better cable comapny than we have around here.

      I get the occasional brief outage on directv. It was bad for a while, and my wife called them (amazing in itself) madder than a wet hen when she missed much of the Reagan funeral. They sent a service call out and credited us for the cost. I felt really foolish when it turned out to be a tree from the neigbor's yard had grown in front of it :)

      Aside from that glitch, I've found the outages to be *far* less common than I used to get from the cable company. And I probably wouldn't even have bothered trying except that I got angry over the cable company losing a payment *again* and getting hostile about it.

      I did try dish network when I first got here. That lasted a couple of days :) We got local channels--when the wind blew hard enough to push a tree up the hill out of the way of the second satellite.

      They still owe me $33 . . . over four years later.

      hawk

    90. Re:About TiVo by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      This is certainly true in consumer electronics and computers. Not so much so with items like cars.

      I think the difference is that cars are used in the public space, so their ostentatious display is a signal that you are wealthy, that you are powerful, and that you deserve respect.

      However lame that is, the reasons are primal; and unfortunately, having a Tivo doesn't really do the same thing, as it's kept hidden in the TV rack.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    91. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a ...

      And I want a pony.

    92. Re:About TiVo by tgd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope the understanding of why people are moving away from Tivo is more widespread within the company. If not, perhaps being out of touch with thet customer is the problem.

      I cancelled my Tivo service about a month ago. I was an early adopter -- I had a unit within a month or so of their release, and by my best estimates somewhere around 40 people have Tivos right now because of firsthand contact with seeing mine. Who knows how many people got them by seeing those people's Tivos.

      Why did I cancel? Tivo is inexcusably late to the market with an HD box, and inexcusably late to the market with a CableCard unit, even ignoring the one-tuner problem. They missed the adoption curve with HD by two years, and they've lost as a result. Dime late, dollar short as they say. I have two HD sets, a cable company that provides HD content, and a half dozen OTA HD channels I can get, and its all a waste with the Tivo. That issue was such a big factor for me, I gave up my Tivo for a Motorola PVR that rarely goes for more than a day without hanging, causing me to lose stuff. I have much higher hopes they'll fix their software than I do Tivo actually making it to market with an HD CableCard unit.

      Here's what I see Tivo's problem is: they forgot about their core market -- the early adopters. We're the people who are going to spend our money on new technology, and demonstrate that to everyone else. We're the ones who needed hardware to track the rest of our technology, not lag it by years. Tivo clearly thought the mass market was more important, and clearly targeted their feature development at that (nearly useless things like Music and Photo sharing which seemed cool to everyone for a few weeks, never to be used again, even ignoring them screwing the early adopters again who paid for it, only to have it given away weeks later). Tivo didn't realize the risk to the mass market that cable companies represent. That mass market doesn't care in the slightest about the "tivo" features... they want to record stuff, pause stuff and play it back. Wishlists, suggestions, all of that means nothing to them.

      So now Tivo has two markets -- one that doesn't care about the things that differentiate their product, and one who can't use their product with their newer equipment.

      If people at Tivo think most people would be much happier with a Tivo, thats precisely why Tivo will not last. Thats such an incorrect reading of the situation, it amazes me your product management staff could actually believe that.

      To reiterate: People do not care in the slightest about the features Tivo brings to the table. Those of us who do, wish we could have them, but being able to actually watch HD programming, and record it is more important to us. Thankfully for us, its going to be easier for Motorola to address the things we don't like than it will be for a struggling Tivo to get to market with a box we can use.

      When I cancelled, the support representative told me she hoped I'd come back again in 18-24 months when the new CableCard units are available. Thats a LONG time for Comcast and the rest of the cable card companies to leapfrog you all again.

      Its a shame, I loved my Tivo.

    93. Re:About TiVo by japhering · · Score: 1

      $13 per month is over half of my cable bill. At 2M subscribers that is $26M per month (give or take a few million for lifetimers).. someone in mgmt needs to be shot if Tivo can't make ends meet on that type of cash flow ...

    94. Re:About TiVo by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Well thats not really a comparision between cable and satallite but between your cable provider and Dish Network. Dish Network and DirecTV differ in many ways.

      Dish Network
      1) Less expensive
      2) More channels

      DirecTV
      1) More expensive (they just upped the rates again 45 dollars for their middle tier plan, which included all none premium channels, 42 for less channels (basically most of the difference is many discovery, DIY, food network type channels))
      2) Much much better customer support.
      3) The installation people are professional and friendly, sadly the "authorized dealer" that installed my system sucked and never gave me my installation rebate, but by the time I went to order TiVo which needed a second line installed, the new installation company was very good and I didn't need to pay anything upfront and wait for a rebate, I was told that they dropped many of their dealers which were previously lackluster
      4) Less channels, but apparently they are launching more satallites soon to provide an extremly large amount of HD channels, though it appears that they arn't going to expand their normal channel lineup ever.

    95. Re:About TiVo by avdp · · Score: 1

      How did DSL get into this?

      It comes into play in the fact that if as a consumer you want broadband you have two choices: DSL or Cable. If you prefer cable broadband over DSL (and I do), then you still need to deal with the cable company and they require you to have at least Basic cable (unless you want to pay an exhorbitant price for that broadband - close to $60 with Adelphia).

      Now why do I prefer cable broadband over DSL? Well, that's almost a whole other topic, but two company names might give you the general idea why: Verizon and Vonage.

    96. Re:About TiVo by abramsh · · Score: 1

      A few things:

      1. The problem really isn't the $13/mo vs. $80/mo, it's $1000+$13/mo vs. $0 + $10/mo. Clearly from a cash perspective cable DVR vs. HDTivo doesn't work.

      2. I've owned several Tivo's, a replayTv, and now a cable dvr (DCT6412). While Tivo is certainly the best of the three, the DCT6412 isn't too shabby and works for most things. It has all the basics: dual hdtv tuners, conflict resolution, fine tuning priorities, viewing/modifing the list of things the box has scheduled to record, 30-sec skip, timebar. The important features it lacks are also lacking on Tivo (being able to record a program just 4 days a week, and only in a certain time slot.) And given $1000 + $3/mo more of the Tivo, how can I justify it?

    97. Re:About TiVo by JHromadka · · Score: 1
      The cable companies can more efficiently provide the same services that TiVo can provide. They haven't completely duplicated the service of TiVo yet but they have charged a heck of a lot less. What can TiVo provide that cable companies can't/don't that justifies the cost? No offense intended to you or TiVo of course.

      The PC companies can more efficiently provide the same services that Apple can provide. They haven't completely duplicated the service of the Mac yet but they have charged a heck of a lot less. What can Apple provide that PC companies can't/don't that justifies the cost? No offense intended to you or Apple of course.

      --
      "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
    98. Re:About TiVo by Moofie · · Score: 1
      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    99. Re:About TiVo by itsNothing · · Score: 1

      May i echo that i, too, would buy a Tivo were it not for the fees. I figure i've already paid for the hardware, why should i pay for the software? I KNOW when and what i want to record -- why is Tivo helping out with this. If i actually watched tv (i don't, but the kids do), i would probably build a DVR myself. As such, i don't think it's worth the time.

    100. Re:About TiVo by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here in the UK the opposite is completely true - I used to have cable from NTL but I gave up in the end because they were so bad:

      1. In August 2000 I phoned NTL to arrange an installation of telephone and cable TV. The wiring was already in from the previous owner of my flat but I was told that they couldn't do the installation for 6 weeks (first sign I should have given up right there). I also checked on the availability of a cable modem and was told that the current service was analogue but they were upgrading the whole network in my area to digital in November 2000 so it'd be available then. They also refused to do the installation on a weekend so I had to take half a day off work (I didn't really see this as a huge problem at the time).

      2. On the arranged installation date the engineer showed up, plugged the analogue cable decoder into the existing wire (that worked ok), tested the phone line and told me he was just going down the the multiplexer to reconnect it. He never returned (second sign I shoudl have given up). I phoned up their support line, waiting in the queue for 90 minutes before being told that my phone line hadn't been connected because they needed to upgrade the multiplexer first (they had already had 6 weeks notice that they were installing the line!). They said it would be 3 months until they did the upgrade! (third sign)

      3. Eventually the phone line was connected (they tried to make me take anouther day off work for that but I managed to convince them that they *would* do a weekend install), but the network upgrade to digital never happened and I eventually decided to save money by switching my Demon dialup internet connection to an NTL one since they did unmetered dialup. I was told that this wasn't available in my area.

      4. Whenever you needed to phone them you would end up having to wait in the phone queue for 60 - 90 minutes and 75% of the time they would then just hang up the call (I have since been told by people who work in NTL call centres that the line-managers do that when the calls aren't being answered quickly enough, since if they don't meet their quota of answered calls they lose their bonus pay - picking up and immediately dropping a call counds as an answered call).

      5. The cable TV connection would break for several hours at a time not infrequently.

      6. The analogue cable TV connection broadcast everything in 4:3 ratio - if it was a 16:9 channel they chopped the sides off the picture. I have a 16:9 TV so I'm left with a choice: chop the top and bottom off to make it 16:9 again (you lose way too much of the picture), squash the picture to make it 16:9 (ugh, distortion) or live with it in 4:3 ratio and big black bars down the side of the screen.

      6. Eventually in 2002 (well over a year after the promised digital upgrade) I gave up, dropped the NTL phone line and TV and switched to Sky Digital satellite TV, a BT phone line and a PlusNet DSL internet connection. BT connected the phone line within 12 hours.

      7. Sky only very rarely goes out (usually due to bad weather - happens maybe once a year for a few minutes)

      8. If I need to phone Sky, BT or PlusNet they pick up the phone almost immediately

      9. PlusNet's service is almost flawless (I know many people who use NTL cable modems and they are always having outages). I also get a subnet of real IP addresses and am allowed to run services on my DSL connection with PlusNet's blessing (NTL won't give you a static IP and their AUP explicitly disallows you from running services on it). The DSL connection almost never goes down.

      10. In 2004 (i.e. almost 4 years after the promised digital upgrade), NTL came canvassing the area to say they now had digital services. They asked me what kind of internet connection I had and I replied "DSL

    101. Re:About TiVo by Specter · · Score: 1

      Respectfully, I'd sumbit that the "cool" factor of the iPod is a contributor to its success but not the _defining_ factor in its success. The iPod is a success because it's so darn easy to use, the UI on the device is wonderful and the actual input interface is so well designed you wonder why it wasn't obvious to everyone else in the first place. Couple that with a very integrated iTunes and you've got the TiVo equivalent of the music world.

      Actually that's one of my big wishes. I'm looking forward to the Netflix deal as well, but what I really wish is that my TiVo was powerful enough to be my interface to my iPod rather than having to rely on my PC.

      Come to think of it, iPod and TiVo are both cut from the same cloth. Perhaps Apple should pickup TiVo, Inc. That would be interesting.

    102. Re:About TiVo by gid · · Score: 1

      I have Time Warner cable in Ohio. The already offer a DVR service for $5/mo extra, and I don't have to buy any equipment, that $5 is purely a rental fee. So I decided to try out the DVR since there's little risk. Does it suck? Maybe, it stores 36 hours of shows and the interface is sufficient, and I can even record two shows at once.

      It really does all I really need. The fast forward is smart, and there's a go back 10 seconds or so button. And most importantly, it's easy to figure out and use.

      Now this box isn't perfect, I think I might have a lemon, it fails to record certain episodes of CSI for no apparent reason and some other shows sometimes, actually it just seems there 2 or 3 channels it has this problem with. And the interface can get locked up for a bit. I think it's all part of the same problem tho. With that being said, I'm really not too unhappy with it skipping some episodes of CSI, since I don't always watch them anyway, and by chance it never skips a rerun of X-Files or the random movie, which is what I really only care about. But all of these problems may be fixed by me returning the unit for a new one.

      Would I be happier with TiVo? Maybe. Would it be worth paying $8 a month more plus the initial investment? I seriously doubt it.

    103. Re:About TiVo by Kombat · · Score: 1

      I, for one, am tired of buying products that i don't own.

      Why? The world is full of perfectly legitimate examples. You rent apartments and cars/trucks. You lease cars/trucks. You pay a cable bill, a cell phone bill. You rent movies from the local Blockbuster. You pay admission to see a movie, an art exhibit, a concert, or a sporting event. You stay in hotel rooms and pay bus/taxi fare. In all these cases, you're paying money for the temporary use of something. You're paying money for something you don't get to "own" at the end of it. It's not wrong, it's not bad, it's perfectly normal. Why are you so concerned about it? Why is it such a bad thing to rent something?

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    104. Re:About TiVo by Secrity · · Score: 1

      What can TiVo provide that cable companies can't/don't that justifies the cost?

      A great user interface and the ability to record up to 312 hours by adding commodity hard drives. There may be other worthwhile advantages as well; with TiVo I can add new programs to record via a webpage, and if I have more than one TiVo I can stream programs from one TiVo to another. The only downside to TiVo for me is that it has only one tuner. My only nitpick is that TiVo has a USB port instead of an ethernet port.

    105. Re:About TiVo by +InvaderSkoodge · · Score: 1

      What TiVo can do, and does, is provide reliability. I don't know about cable company PVRs, but I have a TiVo and two XP Media Center Edition computers. The MCE computers can do things the TiVo can't like burn DVDs and record from two cable channels at once. But I continue to pay TiVo the monthly fee and use my TiVo for one reason. Reliability. In the last three years or so it's only failed to record a show I expected it to record 2 or 3 times. The MCE PCs are far less reliable. If I come home and find my PVR hasn't recorded 24 or Lost, I might give it the benefit of the doubt the first or second time. The third time, it goes in the trash and I go back to the TiVo.

    106. Re:About TiVo by RedX · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info, I was not aware that this type of box was currently available for cable. Unfortunately no Comcast or similar options locally, but like you said, probably just a matter of time. Of course, by that time the broadcast-flag could be in full effect, which would be a negative for the cable co. offerings if they abide by that.

    107. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mom uses tivo: check.

      Till we have to pry that spry remote from her cool, dead fingers.

    108. Re:About TiVo by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      Some of the cable companies (Charter, for example) require you to have digital cable to get broadband. So you're looking at a minimum of $90/month for your combined service with all the wonderful tech support they provide.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    109. Re:About TiVo by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      The SA box is the 8300. Apparently there are variants without the multi room feature you speak of, there are ( according to the sa8000 group on yahoo ) some out in customer hands now.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    110. Re:About TiVo by Kombat · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you got your information from but there's little cost involved. a court ordered subpoena to tivo for the records related to my customer# is all it takes. tivo then either faxes or emails the information back.

      You just answered your own question. First, there's the initial investigating officer. Something you did caught his attention, and he's spent some time investigating you enough to determine that he wants to pull your Tivo records. Say he only spends a few (6?) hours investigating you to start off with. A conservative estimate for the loaded labour rate of a peace officer is, say $100/hour. Add in the cost of creating and processing the subpoena, getting it in front of a justice of the peace, arguing for it, having him/her sign off on it (their time, plus their admin's time, plus plus plus...), then it's sent to Tivo, who has their own people spend some hours handling it, it's passed to their IT guys who pull up the records (possibly from archive), bundle it up, making sure that the info is ONLY for the customer in question, and no other customers' data is accidentally included, then sent back to the officer.

      We're talking DOZENS of people involved here, spending several HOURS of their time following through on this trivial investigation. Can't you see how this would easily and quickly escalate to, at a minimum, several thousand dollars in cost?

      i don't want anyone to know what i'm doing at anytime. period. that holds for my wife

      Are you serious? Holy crap, I give up, there's no hope for you. The only possible, reasonable explanation is that you're not married and have no idea what true love is like. In that case, I simply pity you, and will waste no more time educating you.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    111. Re:About TiVo by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Yes, they update the UI/features occasionally, though the DirecTiVo lags way behind on these updates (luckly there are some hacks out there now to update the DirecTiVo to newer software).

      The subscription cost isn't all that high, its about the same as most people pay for premium content such as HBO, or to upgrade from analog to digital cable. Either way consider TiVo doesn't make any money on the boxes themself and really only makes about 150 a year per suscriber considering the overhead in maintaining modem lines and selling these boxes as little or negative profit.

    112. Re:About TiVo by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
      With cable tv:
      1) They wire behind your walls
      2) If the service goes out they come and fix it (no charge to you)
      3) Unless your wires are faulty - bad weather RARELY (less then 1% for me) affects your connection
      4) High speed cable modems are way bettr then DSL...and satellite high speed is a joke.

      Location is everything. Here in the boonies:

      1. Comcast does wire behind your walls... so long as they're outside walls, and you don't mind them wiring on the outside of the house, and drilling straight through the wall where you want the jack installed. They'll ignore pre-installed wiring, demarcation points and distribution boxes.
      2. Yes, they will. Usually within 60 days. Often within 30. Depends upon to whom and how often you yell, and how good of friends you are with the people who regulate them, if it's a tough problem. (a recent incident comes to mind, where only one of two ONDEMAND boxes working on the same cable, even after three replacements, taking 2 months to fix, because it took the insistance of a knowledgeable tech that the head-end server be rebooted, after COMCAST said, "ONDEMAND is down in your area". "But why does the other box work?")
      3. Faulty wiring is less a problem now than it was 10 years ago, but we still have problems during storms. Seems people keep running into telephone poles and taking out the main cable trunks, knocking out whole neighborhoods. Not the cable company's fault, really, but as much a problem out here as loss of satellite signal has been.
      4. Comcast lists our area as having that nice high-speed cable modem thingy available. Too bad they've not bothered to install the head-end equipment in our town, and haven't upgraded the cable plant to handle it...

      Neither is perfect. If it weren't for Cartoon and SciFi, I'd not bother, since over-the-air is cheaper, and I can get 10 digital channels with "just" a 50 foot tower. And (getting back on topic) TiVo is the only way any of it is worth it!

    113. Re:About TiVo by iowannaski · · Score: 1
      3. The TiVo has a "wishlist" capability.

      This is an essential feature for sports fans in particular. For example, if I want to record every Cubs game or I make wishlists for "Chicago Cubs" and am done with it. My TiVO will now record such disparate programs as "Dodgers vs. Cubs" at 1:20pm Thursday on WGN and "Wednesday Night Baseball: Chicago Cubs at Houston Astros" at 8:00pm Wednesday on ESPN.

      --
      i forget
    114. Re:About TiVo by Kombat · · Score: 1

      It's not "delusional self-importance" to worry about getting declared an "enemy combatant" and having your civil rights suspended.

      Step back for a second and look at what you're saying. Put it in context. Honestly, do you really, truly believe that the government is out there, randomly selecting perfectly innocent (or heck, even simply moderately guilty) USAmerican citizens and shipping them offshore, stripping them of their civil rights? There's a word for that: paranoia.

      This is not a theoretical event, it's actually happened to thousands of people, including a few U.S. citizens.

      It happened to thousands of people who were trying to kill USAmerican soldiers who were there trying to help them. And the "U.S. citizens" it happened to were U. S. citizens by technicality only. They had long since renounced their ties to the USA spiritually, and were actively helping terrorist organizations. Specifically, they were trying to kill US soldiers. I'll cry no crocodile tears for their "plight."

      I'll concede the point that the USPATRIOT act is a travesty of civil rights and constitutional due process. However, I still think you're making a huge, paranoid leap to conclude that the government has either the interest or the resources to be out there, randomly monitoring perfectly innocent, tax-paying citizens, and violating their civil rights left and right for no reason at all. That's just silly. There's no other word for it.

      They have a long track record of coming down on people simply because they have "dangerous" views.

      Really? Name 3. I'll even give you the first one: Jimmy Hoffa (and even that one is merely a highly controversial conspiracy theory).

      If ones choice of reading matter is enough to put you under suspicion, people will be very careful what they read. Not something you want in a free society.

      I call bullsh*t. People are reading and accessing more diverse and inflammatory information now than ever before. Do a Google search on "nuclear bombs." No agents in black suits will show up at your door. The information is out there, and lots of people are accessing it. Every time I go to my library to borrow "The Satanic Verses", someone else has it checked out, which belies your assumptions that the library would be too afraid to stock a copy, and that people would be too afraid to read it. Both are false.

      This whole paranoid line of thinking is just pure bollocks.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    115. Re:About TiVo by timthorn · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the UK, DVRs are already commodities. The model I have (Humax 8000T) costs $220, with no subscription. My parents have the Thomson DHD4000, which can record two channels at once and play a third, and that costs $250 - again with no subscription. There is a free 14 day TV guide that comes over the air, although the advanced scheduling that Tivo provides isn't available. However, the BBC and others have been researching embedding URL type metadata, called Content Reference IDentifiers, into TV programmes. This information will allow you to automatically record all programmes in a series, perhaps even from a trailer. Take a look at TV Anytime http://www.tv-anytime.org/

    116. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an sdk to develop tivo applets. Basically, the sdk lets remote applications access the tv screen using the tivo 2d rendering/windowing system. It looks pretty straight forward to develop an rss reader/html scraper to display weather, stock, headline etc.

      http://tivohme.sourceforge.net/

    117. Re:About TiVo by timthorn · · Score: 1

      No. But there are lots of PVRs on the market here - pop down to Comet or John Lewis or Dixons.

    118. Re:About TiVo by japhmi · · Score: 1

      Either the technical superiority of TiVo will win out or the lower-cost, lower-quality options that the cable companies can offer will win out.

      Betamax was better but more expensive then VHS.

      Yeah, we owned a Betamax because it was better, and eventually we went to VHS because we couldn't buy anything in Beta anymore.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    119. Re:About TiVo by wcrowe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good Eats was bouncing all over the schedule, and I never missed a single new episode.

      That's a good show, BTW.

      My DVR is the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8300 (I think) offered by Cox. Perhaps Time Warner offers a better service, but when you have over 200 channels, browsing by title or genre is, for me, a frustrating waste of time.

      This is especially true when the "genre" is just "Movie". I mean, there is a big difference between, say "War And Peace" and "Earnest Goes To Camp".

      The TiVo Wishlist function is fantastic. For instance: I was watching the "Foyle's War" series on PBS last year. The star of that series is Michael Kitchen. I liked it so much, that I set up a wishlist to find any programs with Michael Kitchen in them.

      The cable-supplied DVR probably looks great to anyone who has never used a TiVo before, but I've become spoiled.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    120. Re:About TiVo by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      That's an excellent example. It's also great if you are a fan of a particular actor or director.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    121. Re:About TiVo by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've got to agree with you. The ability for cable to do "all" o these things "with two conductors" (wide bandwidth coax) is simple dumb luck. Now, to see the telcos do what they're tying to do twisted pair at 20,000 feet. That's taking some effort. Still, it's just RF. The only impressive part is that they've gone from one-way to two-way.

      I'll take DirecTV, and DriecTiVo, for now, at least. Sadly, the coolest things TiVo can offer -technically - are being silenced by the legal department.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    122. Re:About TiVo by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

      I am totally in agreement with you. It is not that hard to build your own box and do what you want with it. I don't have the time or budget to do it right now; but this is the way to go for anyone who can really consider themselves to be even a rookie hacker.
      A relative of mine has had TIVO for about a year and I have not been that impressed with it. Granted, some of the features are nice but one problem I've noticed is that there is a delay between when you push a button on the remote and when the machine reacts.

      --
      "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
    123. Re:About TiVo by powerlord · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It can already provide a file that can be burned with MyDVD and Nero. The only issue with the encryption is that it needs the DRM module to access, so for now it only works on Windows. Hope they change that soon but it certainly addresses 90% of their market (at least).

      Of course, there are tools right now that will let you rip the DRM off of the .tivo and turn it into a .mpeg (http://www.zatznotfunny.com/ttg.htm
      ) but those aren't native to tivo. I'm sure a 'simpler' approach will show up soon. They (Tivo) has also talked in the past about transfering shows back to the Tivo.

      As far as a subscription model:
      Originally the subscriptions covered the box being operational.
      With the new DVD+Tivo units the subscription is optional to provide the "full" functionality (14 day program guide instead of 3 day, and season pass/program search functionality).
      Besides the "basic Tivo functionality" the same subscription fee (or lifetime membership), now includes using the Tivo to view pictures streamed off your PC (great for digital slide shows of trips), and streaming MP3s off of a computer.
      Oh, and the same subscription fee also now provides access to Tivo2Go (as flawed as you feel it is, I can still watch recorded programs on my Computer while my wife watches TV, and on a 100MB wired connection, programs recorded at the "Medium" quality I usually use transfer at about 2x1 ... a one hour show transfers in about 30 minutes).

      Tivo also just unveiled an API so that people can develop applications for the Tivo similar to the Picture and Music viewer (with an eye toward other applications).

      Gee ... certainly seems like they've been doing a lot more than just roll over and die.

      Yes ... the cable and satellite companies are rolling out their own version, but it still isn't Tivo. Oh, and to the person who said they still have VCR so they don't feel a need to get a Tivo, I got mine after my VCR was fried (casuality of the NorthEast blackout a few years back), my Tivo is much more flexible and fun than the VCR was. I can watch one recorded program while recording another, see whats been recorded and go to it instantly, record more than 6 hours if I'm away for the week (and my wife and I have different tastes), find ways of recording what I want that would conflict by checking when else its playing, oh, and allow me to transfer my recordings to my computer for easy viewing if the TV is occupied, or I'm going on the road.

      Tivo will at the very worst be aquired by someone else. The existing technology/patents/customer base is too valuable to pass up.

      Sorry for a bit of a "rant" not directed at you in particular, but those who continue to bash Tivo for the choices they made to stay in buisness with no accounting of the good things they already provide.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    124. Re:About TiVo by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Yours is a straw man argument. You accuse me of seeing a Big Conspiracy to turn America into a police state. It's true that a lot of people see that conspiracy, but I'm not one of them, and I never said there was one.

      What I do see is a lot of federal bureaucrats and politicians with a tendency to abuse their authority. Nothing new about that, but right now they're under a lot of pressure to get results, by any means necessary. And indeed, many of them welcome this situation, since they've always thought current rules make their jobs too hard.

      Cops are necessary, but they're also dangerous. It's not that they're bad people, but they have difficult dangerous jobs a face heavy, contradictory political pressures. That motivates use whatever shortcuts they can find. It's not paranoid to insist that these shortcuts be kept to a minimum.

    125. Re:About TiVo by thoth · · Score: 1

      This is why I use a ReplayTV http://www.replaytv.com/ and DVArchive http://www.dvarchive.org/ (running on a PC). This combo lets me get the shows off the ReplayTV and burn them how ever I want, using my PC.

    126. Re:About TiVo by cens0r · · Score: 1

      The best part about the Comcast DVR versus the TiVo or MythTV (at least for me) is the fact that I only have one extra component on my AV rack. If I was to use myth, I would need two set top boxes and two IR blasters (or use serial cables) to get the same functionality.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    127. Re:About TiVo by m2bord · · Score: 1

      this has gotten way off topic but let me just say that every instance you cite is a rental/leased experience.

      when i pay cash for my car, i used to own it and the components in it. not any more...now there's a blackbox under the dash that reports on me. it doesn't benefit me and it cannot be removed because it's a part of the car's computer system.

      i can go buy a house but i'm limited in the modifications i make to it because of homeowner association rules.

      i buy a computer-game...aka an xbox but to open it up and soup it up a little to my liking is violating microsoft's rules regarding its usage. and the same is true for tivo.

      and don't worry about how my wife and i exist. that's our business. we give each other space and trust each other and that's all that's important.

      --
      Is it 5:30 yet?
    128. Re:About TiVo by Canuck_TV · · Score: 1

      So someone at Scientific Atlanta woke up one morning, decided that bit-bucket PVRs would be a good idea, called the cable company. A lacky on the other end of the line went "Yeah, sure. Sounds good to us." And it happened? Yeesh. Think before you speak.

      The cablecos and manufacturers work TOGETHER to innovate. The customer base to SA is small... a handful of MAJOR players. We make a request. SA makes it happen. Occasionally, the opposite occurs.

      There are NOT a bunch of cable employees sitting on the ship dock waiting for new kit and services to come in. They drive the market.

      As for DircTV TiVos... They're a bit bucket? GREAT! So you guys have done the best you can. Too bad satellite isn't 2-way (to the extent cable is).

    129. Re:About TiVo by curunir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think TiVo users take for granted the ability to pause shows while they're watching. Even when I'm watching a recorded program, I'll pause it to use the bathroom or go make some food or anything else I feel the need to do. It's still a great feature to those who haven't become accustomed to it.

      Also, maybe I'm in the minority, but I've found that TiVo hasn't killed my interest in live TV. It's just changed the way that I watch live TV. Instead of melting down the remote searching for 2-3 minute snippets of something to watch on other channels while avoiding the commercials on the channel I'm watching, I simply pick out two shows to watch (I have DirecTiVo) and switch back and forth skipping the commercials for both.

      If anything, TiVo needs to figure out a way to get 2 tuner support into its regular line of DVRs. People who've never used a DirecTiVo don't understand just how powerful that second tuner really is. Not only that, it's a feature that can be easily sold to customers without even seeing it in action. Just have some husband saying he doesn't miss his favorite show because his wife's show is on. Or some woman saying she can still watch the rose parade despite the fact that her boyfriend's bowl games are on at the same time.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    130. Re:About TiVo by adachan · · Score: 1

      Here is what TiVo needs to survive. What follows can all be bundled under innovation, but in reality none of it is really innovation at all, just support of what already exists, but noone has chosen to support for whatever reason.

      Support of generic hard drives for upgrades (I realize this is already supported, but it should be expoited. I find it crazy that some HDD based recorders are much more in cost for a few more gigs. The one I have even has a format HDD button built in!!!)

      Support of DVD recording (blueray would be much better here -- Check out this --http://www.sony.jp/products/Consumer/BD/index.ht ml
      I realize its japanese, but it is available already in Japan -- why not everywhere else -- you should take the lead)

      Real support of High Definition -- By this I dont mean just tuning it and displaying it. We really want to record it. Allow us to output the signal to DVI and component with TOS link and PCM sound. But in addition allow us to transfer the content to other devices via firewire. This can be done. I am doing it already with my Motorola DCT-6200 and some DVHS capture software. Its kind of a hack, but it works fine. The main complaint is that the files are stored as .ts This is hard to deal with as far as converting to divx or mpeg or what ever. You should make this step easy for us. I know there is mandated copy protection on the firewire cable connection, but for the sake of god -- just make software that is compatable with the law. I mean everyone is going to try to hack it anyway, just make the software so it fits the law, then you did your job.)

      Make a pci card (computer based) version of the box. This fixes all the things I said above. This will take care of everything. Allow for over the air tuning, satellite tuning, and digital cable tuning. Get your act togetehr and allow us to use our computers to be the PVR they can.

    131. Re:About TiVo by prockcore · · Score: 1

      we want to do it with a piece of hardware we can get at Best Buy.

      Then get the DVDTiVo. Sheesh.

    132. Re:About TiVo by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Your observation is missing a key point, and that is:

      Compared to the car industry, we're barely at the end of the 1920s.

      Think back to the real start of the computer industry boom in the 80s - you can have any color PC you want, as long as it's IBM-Compatible. This was the equivilant of the Model T - affordable, plentiful, pain in the ass to use, but serviceable and VERY upgradable.

      So, now think of the car industry at the end of the 1920s...the industry was saturated, and like any industry moving into the replacement phase, it was just starting to show well-defined lines of separation between market segments. Some people look to replace their current car for the same thing, while others look to upgrade.

      Still, nobody was quite sure what they were doing, and creating steady demand for ANY market segment was still an iffy task. This is why by the 1920s and 30s, most independent manufacturers merged into one of the few giants still around today...and those giants carefully maintained market segments within their subsidiaries. The same thing is starting to happen with the PC industry, although it hasn't gotten through the thick skulls of CEOs quite yet.

      So, what happened to make people so willing to research cars? Well, the stabilized market segments and feature sets made it a little easier for everyone to follow the trends and understand the basics. Also, the high price, long potential service life and the necessity of ownership makes them a decision worth researching heavily...just like say, a home purchase.

      Computers, unfortunately, have NONE of the above going for them. The market segments have never quite stabilized, and manufacturers are hawking a new whiz-bang solition looking for a problem every month. PCs today aren't expensive enough for people to give them much critical research, especially considering their lifetime of use is much shorter than a good car. Also, computer ownership today is not at all a requirement to do business.

      Until at least a couple of these factors change, people just aren't going to care enough to research PC purchases, and thus most will live with their Model T and try to upgrade it on their own when they discover that it doesn't come with headlights.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    133. Re:About TiVo by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If anything, TiVo needs to figure out a way to get 2 tuner support into its regular line of DVRs. People who've never used a DirecTiVo don't understand just how powerful that second tuner really is. Not only that, it's a feature that can be easily sold to customers without even seeing it in action.
      I agree, but not for the reasons you cite. The fact is that most people just don't grasp the fact that a VCR or a PVR has its own tuner. It's an obvious fact to any gadget-geek like you or me, but try to explain it to anybody else and their eyes glaze over. (If you don't believe me, grab a couple of ordinary people and ask them to explain how a VCR can record when the TV isn't turned on. Assuming they even know that it can.) So people are recording a show, they want to watch something else while the show is recording, but Tivo won't let them change they channel, and they can't understand why.

      So don't say, "There's two tuners!" That's just more technonoise.

      Why weren't two tuners to begin with? The same reason early Tivos had so much flaky hardware. They cut every corner they could, trying to get the price down. They decided to sacrifice usability and reliability in order to get a price people would pay. Alas, they didn't succeed in that either.

    134. Re:About TiVo by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Bah Tivo is overpriced.

      40 hour replayTV is currently running at $50.00 ($100.00 with a $50.00 rebate)

      and all extra boxes at home are onlt $6.00 a month.

      tivo will NOT give a discount for other boxes at home, but then tivo's lack the capability to network together and have 2 or more units act as one... In effect I have a 3 tuner 360 hour replayTV at home where I can watch any of the content at 3 different locations at once.

      and they say they are the innovators?

      not to verbally bash tivo but they really need to innovate and look hard at getting customers.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    135. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of my family or friends have an HDTV so can we still use Tivo?

    136. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think your cable company will give you these things for free, think again. With a cable bill of around $120 a month, a few extra dollars a month in a jacked up pricing would cover the cost of buying your own DVR.

      And on another note, Tivo is much more than a DVR. A DVR is like a VCR, and Tivo is like having your own TV Guide to tv...don't knock what you haven't used and don't tell people that its the same as a DVR when you haven't used eitehr of em...

      The cable DVRs suck right now, onDemand is a joke and you'll notice most people say 'i can use ondemand' versus 'i use ondemand'...

    137. Re:About TiVo by ATN · · Score: 0

      How come TiVo doesn't have a patent on this technology. It seems to me that if TiVo was the original inovator in this field that they should have exclusive rights to sell this type of technology for a while? Is this another example of patent systems failing?

    138. Re:About TiVo by djw · · Score: 1
      TiVo can provide technical innovation.
      I know this comment is probably not going to get much notice, since there are already about 572 replies in this subthread, but here goes.

      If innovation is what TiVo is bringing to market, then it had better start innovating. I've been a subscriber for going on three years, and I'm still waiting for "soft padding" (or whatever you want to call the solution to the problem that I can't record The West Wing at all when Lost runs until 9:01).

      I could go on and whine about other features that are poorly implemented or entirely lacking, but the padding issue is killer. That's how the networks are getting their revenge on DVRs, and the only ones that will survive are the ones that can cope with this problem. TiVo users have been screaming about this for years, and from TiVo we get only silence.

      I'm not disputing that TiVo is the best DVR on the market. But it needs to stay that way, because (as has been observed) it sure ain't competing on price. So where is the innovation?

    139. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given this wonderful collaboration you've described the results we see are kind of sad.
      I guess a lack of real competition lets companies sit back and take it a little easy since there's no urgency to fix bugs.

      P.S. Thank you for innovating all these features I don't use. Can you please raise my basic service rates again?

    140. Re:About TiVo by mzwaterski · · Score: 1
      Nice AC...down boy...

      I have used the cable DVR, TiVo, and home built DVR/HTPC systems.

      As to your argument about the price of cable with DVR...TiVo requires a subscription cost which is more than the cost to rent DVR from the cable company. At 5$ a month, I could rent a cable box for 5 years before I paid off the lifetime subscription for TiVo.

      Cable company DVRs are much more than VCRs as well. But thats beyond the point, because my comment was that cable companies could provide these features for a lower price. The fact that they don't at this point indicates that they do not fear people spending the extra $$ each month to get TiVo for the features. With such a valid competitor as TiVo in the market, this indicates to me that these features are just not that important to most people.

      Finally, I wasn't "knock[ing]" anything and I certainly did not give any advice in my post... Oh, and one more thing, do you really pay 120$ a month just for cable tv? Thats twice what I pay...

    141. Re:About TiVo by japhering · · Score: 1
      The problem as I see it is that TiVo doesn't seem to provide anything that a geek with a Linux box couldn't.
      A $100 price point and that "works out of the box" experience
      $100 for the box and $300 for lifetime or $13 per month .. ends up being a lot more than $100
    142. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corrections:

      Service for additional standalone TiVo boxes is around $7 a month, similar to your $6. For DirecTiVo, a single $5 fee covers up to 5 or 10 boxes within your household.

      You can watch shows from other networked TiVos. You cannot change settings from another TiVo though.

    143. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The verb "tivo" is firmly established in the American lexicon. I'd hardly call that a failure of marketing.

      That only becomes relevant once people who don't own a TiVo start using the verb, and I haven't seen that happen yet. I have a DVR from Adelphia. I don't "tivo", I "record". Hell, my wife still says "tape".

    144. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HUH?!?!?!?!?!? Did I miss something? When did Apple go out of business??????? ?-)

    145. Re:About TiVo by aztechClanIII · · Score: 0

      I think, at least for me, it was the lack of a land-line phone that kept me away from TivO. Not $$$. Cause I spent way more on my HTPC 3.2Ghz Prescott w/PVR250x2 and Snapstream BeyondTV. There are also many plusses to having direct control over the MPEG2's that get recorded.. And I've got sweet GameZ on there too, like Mame32 and HL2.

    146. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is new!

      when i invested in replayTV 11 months ago I gave tivo a good hard look. I even called their sales line and was told "we will never give discounts for multiple units." reasoning being it's too easy for someone to get a second one and keep it at a friends house.

      too bad they did not offer this 11 months ago when I was in the market and dropped $$$ on 3, 120 hour units.

    147. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I dunno, he could be married - he'll probably end up having his wife testify against him in court due to his paranoid delusional behavior pissing her off.

      Well, assuming he doesn't get piss her off enough to get divorced before whatever goes down, at which point spousal privilege goes out the window - plus she's already been pissed off enough to leave him, helping to put his ass away is barely a half-step at that point.

      But what could he be so paranoid about? I'm going to guess an odd prediliction for playing 15 second loops of video from Disney/Nick for 5 minutes at a stretch. That would explain why he doesn't want anyone, anywhere knowing what he's doing at any time, for any reason.

      Of course, all this being said, I hope he doesn't go out and murder his poor wife for being a threat to his pedophile activities.

    148. Re:About TiVo by eufreka · · Score: 1
      A $100 price point and that "works out of the box" experience.


      It has been my experience that most Linux geeks only have about $100 and they "live out of the box" (down by the river)...


      That said (in jest, I might add), I have 3 Tivo Series 2 Standalones for which I paid $50 each (purchased remanufactured directly from Tivo last summer). I pay $27 a month to Tivo gladly--$13 for the first, $7 each on the second and third). I leave it as an exercise for others to figure out the breakeven point of monthly subscription versus lifetime on all three boxes, but I am pretty sure subscription is the way to go here. I have cable, but don't have any settop boxes.


      We have MultiRoom Viewing, Home Media Option and Tivo2Go enabled on all three, so bascially, I can record on any of the 3, and watch from one to another (did I mention they are all on my home network via wired ethernet?), including starting something in one room and finishing it in another.


      Anything I like gets transferred in the background to a home media PC server...where there are ways to make the video "available" to all devices in the home. But what I really want is for Tivo to dump the big HardDrive units and stick with 40 or 80 gig'ers...use the PC/network for permanent storage and incorporate playback from the PC to the Tivo DIRECTLY.


      The reality remains that people who have NOT used a Tivo should NOT be allowed to comment on their value proposition. I have other thoughts about this as well, but you will have to find them elsewhere...

    149. Re:About TiVo by jwsd · · Score: 1

      To save Tivo, please add a feature to download and burn popular video file formats to DVD. The company is dying any way, worry about lawsuits later.

    150. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe me, it can be very disheartening to work for an innovator in a marketplace where large established companies have such control over the distribution channels.

      Cry me a freaking river.

      You knew this going in -- the reason you're in the marketplace is that there is a lot of money to be made there, but it's a very mature area and the competition is therefore massive and well established. If you don't like it, get the hell out, don't just stand there and whinge on Slashdot.

    151. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No HD
      Not really an issue, seeing how in excess of 90% of US households don't have HDTV. Obviously this is a problem for the lunatic fringe who have more money than common sense.

      No 5.1
      See former.

      Single tuner
      Would be interested to know how a external box like Tivo is supposed to digitally tune cable TV when the US cable system is a mismash of competing standards and proprietary implementations. You can see how it should be done, if the cable companies weren't intent on making sure nobody else makes an inroad into their system, with the DirecTivo. No shortage of tuners on those units.

      Upfront cost is ~$200 vs $0
      You spent god knows how much money on an HDTV + 5.1 setup and you're pissy over another $200? Holy crap. Less than 10% of what you spent on the rest of your setup, which you'll only really use (HDTV) less than 10% of the time, and you're pissing and moaning. Wow. Kind of brings me back to the latter part of #1, doesn't it?

      Monthly cost is $13 vs. $10
      For now. I realize you're a recent visitor to this country, so perhaps you haven't heard - cable companies do this thing called raising their rates? On average they do it once a year. Sometimes they'll do it multiple times a year to move that average down. My local Comcast charges >$50/month for basic service, then charges another $7/month for a digital cable box, which I'm forced to get even though they also broadcast basic service in analog. They're trying to phase analog service out by forcing all new subscribers to get digital. Evidently they've been on this tack in my neighborhood for the better part of 5 years. Analog's still around. Evidently they're on a 20 year plan to piss off their customers.

      They sign people up to 1 year contracts at cut rate, then after a year you can either get DirecTV/Dish or suck it up and pay whatever they want. Did I mention cable modem service is another $50/month on top of that? North of $100/month for basic cable service with digital cable modem service?

      These are the assholes you think are going to lead us into the promised land of digital TV. Right.

    152. Re:About TiVo by jafac · · Score: 1

      I was an early adopter.
      The reason why I opted for my Satelite provider's PVR (DishPlayer) was simple:
      TiVo's IR-blaster did not work. Not at all. Not a damn bit. I couldn't change channels with my remote. Other than that, I thought TiVo was great.

      DishPlayer had a lot of bugs. (so many, there was a successful class action against them). But overall, it had a focus on the bare-minimum UI and functionality. It was much simpler to use than the early TiVos. Despite the fact that because of the bugs, you often had to reboot, and go through a 30-minute download of a fresh channel-guide to get the thing to work. And it had a 30-second skip button.

      I've since dumped satelite altogether, because no, I'm not willing to pay $80/month - there's nothing on anymore. (I go to my freind's house to watch his Tivo'd Battlestar Galactica. That's ALL I watch. NOT worth $80/month, or even $40.)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    153. Re:About TiVo by toccoa · · Score: 1

      For some perspective on Apple's decline, the INCREASE in Apple's market capitalization ( the $value of all its stock) since last June is approximately 9 times the value of Red Hat or Novell. I.e., Apple's gained in value approximately a entire Red Hat company every month for the last 9!

    154. Re:About TiVo by koreth · · Score: 1
      Tivo is inexcusably late to the market with an HD box

      Huh? I've had a HD TiVo since last year. They're expensive, granted, but they are most definitely on the market already!

      It's the HR10-250 if you want to see it.

    155. Re:About TiVo by Nemi · · Score: 1
      TiVo can provide technical innovation.
      Hmm, I have wanted to get a tivo for some time now. The only thing stopping me? A land line is required.

      Before you say anything, I understand that new tivos work over broadband. However, as I understand it, to get a new tivo to work over broadband you must first - wait for it - hook it up to a phone line. Excuse me? I don't have a phone. Period.

      Explain to me why a company that is so technically innovative would just now be in the process of broadband enabling their hardware? I am genuinely curious.

    156. Re:About TiVo by jpostel · · Score: 1

      I was looking to see who would make the Apple comparisons. The death knell for Apple has been sounding for 10 years or more. Let me know when it stops so I can start worrying. :p

      I have two TiVos. I have 5 Macs. I have several production and stacks (literally) of non-production white box PCs that are kept for sentimental reasons.

      Either way, TiVo is the best commercial option available today. When they stop coming up with new stuff and get bought out by someone that sucks, I will stop buying new TiVos.

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
    157. Re:About TiVo by NickDoulas · · Score: 1

      TiVo is really late to market with HD, but even if they had a good HD product today, I just don't see how TiVo can compete with Comcast on price. For an extra $10/month from Comcast, I get DVR and HD programming, with no up front costs.

      I've had a TiVo for about 4 years, it has completely changed TV for me, and it still has a better interface than the Comcast box. But it's not enough better.

      Sadly, I don't think TiVo has advanced their product much in the last several years. The Series 2 box wasn't enough of an improvement to make me wish I could replace my Series 1 box, and they haven't done anything since then of any significance as far as I can tell.

      I will be sorry to see them die.

    158. Re:About TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - that is my biggest complaint with my Tivo Series 2. South Park episodes have their last minute cropped off. Extending the record time by 1 minute doesn't help most times because it will prevent a show recording in the next half hour slot.

    159. Re:About TiVo by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      This will be fixed if the cable companies every stop dragging their feet on CableCard.

      When we got tivo, our cable box was replaced by the Tivo. Tivo connects just fine to Coax.

    160. Re:About TiVo by bjb · · Score: 1
      It has other features that Tivo does not, such as a Firewire port to offload content (which I haven't used yet so I can't really vouch for it).

      I would be VERY surprised if the firewire port was even enabled.

      The DVR devices from Scientific Atlanta and Motorola both feature a dozen ports (USB, Firewire, ethernet), but most likely they're disabled by either the firmware (never implemented) or the cable company.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    161. Re:About TiVo by cens0r · · Score: 1

      What you say is true. But I don't forsee the cable companies ever doing it. What is in it for them?

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    162. Re:About TiVo by hawk · · Score: 1

      10 years? Keep going :) It predates the macintosh!

      I even bought into it for a while. At some point in the mid to late 90's, I came to the conclusion (I forget how) that Apple could be liquidated for about $20/share. It was a risk, so I held out during its plummet to buy a couple of hundred shares at $13. But it stopped at 14 :(

      Also, the death of apple was "well established" due to its market share at a point where Apple's 5% or so made it the largest producer of computers a couple of quarters a year. Heck, I'd be happy for 1% of that market :)

      hawk

    163. Re:About TiVo by BCole · · Score: 1

      I have a dual tuner HD Tivo so I haven't run into this very often. I know you can extend the recording by X number of minutes, can you delay it also?

    164. Re:About TiVo by curunir · · Score: 1

      Why weren't two tuners to begin with?

      Because the majority of TiVos recieve their feed from a cable or satellite decoding box that has only one output. You'd need a second decoding box to decode the digital signal to utilize a second TiVo tuner. And as kludgy as the channel changing mechanism is currently, adding a second decoding box would make it even worse. The only reason it works in the DirecTiVo setup is that it has both the TiVo functionality and the satellite decoding in the same box.

      That's why I said "TiVo needs to figure out a way"...they need to work out the legal angles of getting their boxes to do the decoding of the cable/satellite signal.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    165. Re:About TiVo by djw · · Score: 1
      No. There's no negative padding -- you can't start a recording later than the scheduled time.

      What you can do is set a manual recording for 9:05, and pad it to start 4 minutes early. But manual recordings are not at all an adequate substitute for Season Passes. They don't skip reruns or follow lineup/schedule changes, for example.

    166. Re:About TiVo by jpostel · · Score: 1

      No joke. People seem to forget how much 5% of a multi-billion dollar market is.

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
    167. Re:About TiVo by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could comment on this:

      TiVo has really gone out of their way to NOT have simple ways to provide customer feedback. I can't find a single-click method on the website to "Send Feedback".

      I have plenty of really neat ideas, I understand cost vs. benefit analysis, and most of the ideas I've thought up for my TiVo are rediculously easy/cheap... but I'm not going to spend hours fiddling around in the TiVo forums, or hunting for a way to send them. Is there a "simple" way?

      By simple I mean:
      - E-mail address. Yes we all get spam, and we all deal with it. The company I work for has a Global Tech Support e-mail address, why can't TiVo?
      - One-click web-form right on the front page of tivo.com.

      Seriously -- it's like you guys go out of your way to NOT listen to customers.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    168. Re:About TiVo by smackjer · · Score: 1
      I would be VERY surprised if the firewire port was even enabled.

      I tried it last night, and after some searching on AVSForum.com and some driver and software installation I was able to copy (in real-time) audio and video from my cable box. So yes, the Firewire port is definitely enabled!

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    169. Re:About TiVo by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      But I don't forsee the cable companies ever doing it. What is in it for them?

      That is indeed, the problem. Hopefully it gets forced on them. I doubt it could make the situation worse.

      What I am waiting for, now that telcos and others are getting into the television game, is for someone to come out with a $20/mo rate that completely undercuts everyone else. Sadly, they'll probably price it at $34.99 or something $2 cheaper...

  3. maybe by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe if TiVo has patents on their system, they can use those to make enough money to stay afloat for a while?

    1. Re:maybe by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Maybe if TiVo has patents on their system, they can use those to make enough money to stay afloat for a while?

      I seem to recall that TiVo has patents on basic PVR functionality. I'm surprised that I haven't heard more about TiVo wielding them to threaten the cable providers who bundle PVRs.

    2. Re:maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What Tivo should consider doing is:
      1. Setup a separate business unit (BU) with their DVR patents.
      2. The separate BU would give the current Tivo, Inc. perpetual licenses for all patents.
      3. Spin off the BU. Maybe an IPO, maybe not.
      4. The BU sues the hell out everybody infringing on their patents.
      5. Profit! Both for the BU and Tivo.

        Sorry for expanding on step 2.

  4. Bad idea by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    That would be focussing on the consumer. This approach sounds good, but it never works. All you end up with is greedy consumers wanting more and more.

    The only way to do business these days is to court other businesses, and work with them. Those are the ones with all the money.

    1. Re:Bad idea by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would be focussing on the consumer. This approach sounds good, but it never works. All you end up with is greedy consumers wanting more and more.

      Damn those greedy customers, expecting more and more for what they will surely be willing to pay for.

    2. Re:Bad idea by TrIp0d · · Score: 0
      The only way to do business these days is to court other businesses, and work with them. Those are the ones with all the money.

      This is already the case in many industries, and that is what makes things so expensive. There is a thing called "markup". Whatever it costs to produce something is multiplied by a percentage, and then sold downstream. If the only way to do business was business to business, there would be an endless cycle of markups so much so that Microsoft couldn't afford a box of paperclips.

      Aside from that, the programming is horrible on TV in general. It's all the same 'reality' crap. When is that last time you were hanging from a helicopter drinking ground up Yak penis? How about some substantial content?

      TiVo can't fix that by recording garbage. Come on Slashdotters, you all know "garbage in, garbage out" and maybe the cable and satellite companies don't know what a lot of us want. I don't want to pay $80 per month so I can have 15 channels of Home Shopping, 8 news channels that show the same thing all the time and the rest of the channels are like crappy radio stations that play the same 10 tunes aver and over again. And after midnight, it's ALL home shopping.

      I know that programming is largely a matter of opinion, but I think I speak for almost everyone when I say I don't like paying $80 per month for infomercials, home shopping, and over half a dozen news channels.

  5. ChipGuy by kngthdn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whoever this ChipGuy fellow is, he sure hates Tivo! Not only is this story a dupe, but ChipGuy submitted both of them. I wonder how many were rejected. ; )

    Here's the original.

    1. Re:ChipGuy by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Whoever this ChipGuy fellow is, he sure hates Tivo! Not only is this story a dupe, but ChipGuy submitted both of them.
      It sounds to me like a short seller of TIVO stock who is trying to drive the price down. There was a guy named "lenticular" on the old Motley Fool message board for TIVO that would relentlessly do the same thing.

      Either that or it's just somebody with a chip on his shoulder.

    2. Re:ChipGuy by Qoud · · Score: 3, Informative

      How about this one. Seems like he's got a chip on his shoulder...

    3. Re:ChipGuy by mr_zorg · · Score: 1

      Moderators: Why the hell is this moderated funny? This is a very good point and is interesting or informative -- not funny. And other replies to this post have pointed out yet more posts from ChipGuy downing TiVo. Certainly seems like this guy has some grudge against them.

  6. Proof by nightsweat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tivo's problems are proof that you can not meet the RIAA/MPAA/advertisers halfway. They will screw you.

    You either have to roll over completley or get ready for a long hard battle that you will win. TIVO wimped out and tried to make everyone happy, in the process making very few people happy. They'll get bought by someone. I'd like it to be Apple, but I'm skeptical.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:Proof by bnenning · · Score: 1

      You either have to roll over completley or get ready for a long hard battle that you will win.

      Bingo. And rolling over isn't an option because that's what the cable companies are doing, and they have tremendous infrastructure advantages. That leaves standing up for customers' rights as the only viable strategy, and it may be too late for that.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    2. Re:Proof by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      hey'll get bought by someone. I'd like it to be Apple, but I'm skeptical.

      Nope. Too much debt--if you buy the company, I'm pretty sure that means having to purchase the debt too. Much more likely someone buys the patents and does their own thing with it; or buys the subscriber list.

      Maybe that'd be Apple, but they'd have to figure out how to avoid the same fate; maybe because they could showcase the product int their stores whereas Best Buy doesn't exactly have TiVo units hooked up to TVs as demos; or maybe Apple does it to move mini Macs as Home Media centers, and take a loss on the actual interface (ala the reverse razor-blades strategy that they've been using with the iTunes Music Store and iPods)

      But Tivo as we know it wouldn't be likely to continue.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    3. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much debt does TiVo have? I thought they still had some money in the bank.

  7. Why... by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

    ... They'll be bought out by Google, of course! http://www.broom.org/epic/

    --
    Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    1. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely Agree...

      all your base are belong to Google....

  8. Cue the haters by jargoone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pick your poison:

    1. "My cable company's DVR works just fine, why should I pay extra for a TiVO?"
    2. "I don't watch TV, why do I want a TiVo?"
    3. "My MythTV box only took me 3 weeks to get working, and I will probably only have to mess with the guide data stream a few times a year, and the hardware only cost twice as much as a TiVo."

    We've heard them all before...

    1. Re:Cue the haters by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 1

      I don't really see 1. or .2 as haters. Frankly, that is what's killing tivo. Around here, you can get it from the local cable company for free, because its like a cable modem, they own it, and its yours only as long as you have the service. But most people who have the service aren't going to drop it anytime soon, so what do they care? And personally, I fall into the second catergory; I barely watch any television, mostly just adult swim and occassionally some movies on TNT. I wouldn't shell out the cash for any kind of tivo, dvr or any other special service, its not worth it.

    2. Re:Cue the haters by LionATL · · Score: 1

      I was a hater because I wanted recording functionality if I did not to subscribe to TiVo's monthly service. Most TiVo units do not enable recording (manual or otherwise) without the monthly subscription.

      I wanted the *choice* between manual event programming for free or subscribing for season passes, wish lists, recording by name, etc.

      I refused to buy a TiVo until Toshiba introduced the SD-H400 Digital Media Server.

      http://www.tacp.toshiba.com/dvr/product.asp?mode l= sd-h400

      The SD-H400 comes with TiVo's "basic" service for free. Basic service allows manual event recording (start, stop and channel like a VCR) and provides download of three days of schedules. Record by name, season pass, wish list, etc. are not included in the basic service.

      Turns out a still subscribe to the monthly service for the extras. But I can shut it off any 'ol time and still have a useful unit....

    3. Re:Cue the haters by Entropy_ajb · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot:
      4. Messed with MythTV for a month trying to get it to actually work and be usefull, and then ditched it for Windows MCE.

    4. Re:Cue the haters by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      "My MythTV box only took me 3 weeks to get working, and I will probably only have to mess with the guide data stream a few times a year, and the hardware only cost twice as much as a TiVo."

      Sure, the hardware might cost twice as much as a TiVo box, but it costs less than the TiVo box + monthly or "lifetime" subscription, and if TiVo goes under I'm not left with a useless box.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    5. Re:Cue the haters by JordanArendt · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. You can use SA just like a digital VCR and manually record by time and channel. Many people up in Canada do just that.

    6. Re:Cue the haters by eison · · Score: 1

      Would you believe you are both right?

      All Tivos series 1 stand alone units work the way LionATL described without subscriptions. It is normally referred to as "boat anchor mode", but can still do manual recordings.

      Normal series 2 units don't record without subscriptions. They only have the live buffer, that's it.

      --
      is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
    7. Re:Cue the haters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3.5. I used KnoppMyth with my old (free to me) hardware, buying a supported TV tuner for $100 and followed the howtos and got it all setup in one afternoon. I record things using a set of rabbit-ears, so I don't pay any monthly fee for my programming.

      There is enough stuff in 1344 hours of TV every week (that's 8 english channels x 24 x 7) that I can fill the ~10 hours I spend watching TV each week. Especially with Simpsons coming on twice a day.

  9. I for one... by greypilgrim · · Score: 1

    Say we should read it its rights, drag it out in the back and shoot it.

  10. Steps by cthrall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. Tivo licenses content.
    2. Tivo provides nice search interface for Tivo BitTorrent client.
    3. Tivo provides centralized Torrent servers and includes content in $12.95.
    4. Goodbye cable!

    Has anybody tried the new SDK? It's pretty cool...they should have done it from the beginning.

    1. Re:Steps by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      In case TIVO is listening, I'd pay much more than $12.95 for this. If I had access to all the same stuff as is on my cable line only it was on demand at any time after the shows first released I'd go so far as to pay a premium for this service of about 10% over my current cable bill.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:Steps by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      About the SDK, I've downloaded it but haven't taken a good look at it. What I'm wondering is if the SDK provides an interface for accessing the recorded content on the TiVo. Either way, I think its a neat idea...probably not one that will make the TiVo any more appealing to people who don't own one but it will probably add something to users who already have one.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    3. Re:Steps by cthrall · · Score: 1

      From the SDK FAQ:

      > The HME Early Access release can be used to
      > create great looking applications that display
      > on TV and interact with the user through the
      > TiVo remote control. You can also stream mp3s to
      > the TiVo DVR for playback.

      > Future releases will expose more of the TiVo
      > platform, including the DVR features.

      Not now...and I doubt they'll ever let folks grab content off the device in a format that does not include DRM...especially when sites hosting torrents of broadcast TV are getting yanked.

      It will also be interesting to see what kind of DVR controls will be released...if they expose the functionality that lets users stab play and have the device start playing where the commercial stopped, there's no reason commercial skip couldn't be either automated or one click on the remote.

      I think Tivo is going to make it, and has the possibility to be a very big winner, but there's also the chance that the networks will squash them like a bug.

    4. Re:Steps by thehun101 · · Score: 1

      You aren't the only one. I currently pay more than $60 a month for the televison portion of my cable bill. I would happily hand that over to Tivo (after buying one) if I could download and watch shows on or after their release date. As an example, I've been saying to myself lately that the new Battlestar Galactica series looks great, but it's so hard to get into sci-fi show after missing several episodes so I don't watch it. I'd try to get my DVR to record it but the cable provided POS would never ba able to handle it.

      That brings me to my second point, a Tivo ondemand service would have to 'just work.' I'm fairly patient with these things, but my wife isn;t and we are both fairly fed up with the crappy quality of our DVR however I just don't see the current incarnation of Tivo as a complete solution, just a bandage. Some day true video on demand will exist, and TV viewers will rejoice and be happy. If I had the capital I'd try to make it happen myself.

      -the Hun

      --
      I'm a Tasty-vore. If it's Tasty, I'll eat it.
  11. Tivo has always been on my todo list by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 1

    Tivo's something I've always found neat, but the cost and/or monthly fees has always made me want to roll my own with MythTV

    --
    time is a perception of a being's consciousness
    time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    1. Re:Tivo has always been on my todo list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... Right... Due to the $100-$200 cost of the TiVo hardware and the $250 life-time subscription, you're not buying a TiVo. Instead, you want to spend $600 and build a MythTV box.

      Dumbass.

    2. Re:Tivo has always been on my todo list by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 1

      Actually, Walmart sells a sempron 2200+ linspire pc for $200. Add a $25 capture card, a $25 IR or RF remote, and 2 ratshack RCA/stereo conveters for $5, then you have your own PVR ($255). Best part is, you can decide want you want in it, a web browser, dvd player, mp3 jukebox, its up to you.

      --
      time is a perception of a being's consciousness
      time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    3. Re:Tivo has always been on my todo list by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not buying a seperate box for MythTv. I, like many computer enthusiasts, tend to normally build my own boxes and upgrade components as they age. That leaves me with a few components lying around. So, I put together a server with a bunch of disk space to offload a bunch of my home "production" applications -- keep them off the box that I'm constantly playing with and onto something more stable.
      So, for an investment of $50 or so, I can add a basic capture card and have an instant dvr. Oh, and I also have the option to add additional tuners (currently waiting for some of the multi-tuner mpeg capture cards to be supported), and if I wanted to I can put together seperate front-end boxes for different TV's in the house (each front end can be used by a different family member, yet they all can pool the recordings on the main server). Again, these will be built from left-over components after various upgrades, and they will also be multi-purpose (I've been planning on putting computers in the kids' rooms anyways).

    4. Re:Tivo has always been on my todo list by treke · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't recommend making the switch on the basis of the cost of the Tivo. The cost of the Tivo with lifetime service is probably the same or cheaper than setting up a nice quiet dedicated Myth box, even without factoring the time it will take to get Myth up and running satisfactorily.

      I had a Tivo for about a year, and I really liked the box. It did exactly what it was supposed to do for a reasonable price, and the ads in the menus didn't annoy me too much. Setting it up took a couple hours to do, but that was mostly a matter of waiting for the tivo to download the data and do the initial import.

      About two months ago I got rid of the Tivo and replaced it with a small PC running MythTV, and am happy with it as well. The main selling point for me was the ability to watch video from my desktop or laptop along with on my TV. I lost a few features like sugesstions and the more refined interface, but for me the trade offs were worth it. It took me two days to get the system basically up and running, along with a week or two of tweaking things as I noticed them. It's a great system on its own, but if you jump into it thinking it's just going to be a cheap Tivo you will be disappointed.

    5. Re:Tivo has always been on my todo list by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      You're going to have to spend another $25 or more to get the rest of that capture card, plus another $75 and a lot of hassle for a video card if you want to connect your PVR to a tv(as most people do). Oh, and good luck watching DVDs with that CD-Rom drive.

      --
      i forget
  12. My God, I'm old. by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow, I barely even have broadcast TV. Seriously, every time I call my friend, he's watching a movie. Have we become a world of protoplasm living by proxy, entertaining ourselves to death? Who cares if TiVo dies? Who the hell can watch SO MUCH TV, you need a COMPUTER to track it all?

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
    1. Re:My God, I'm old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you don't watch TV then no one else should. If you don't need TiVo then no one else does either.

      Did I capture your opinion correctly?

    2. Re:My God, I'm old. by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1
      Nice strawman. Did you make it yourself? My opinion is that the EXCESS of anything is something to worry about. When you are watching so much TV that you need a computer to keep track of all your shows and a hard drive to keep them on, then yeah, you have a problem.

      I'm just a regular guy. I work full time. I come home at night, I study for my one course I take at university, sometimes I cook, clean or read.

      The fact you described TiVo as a *NEED* tells me everything I need to know about you, my friend.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    3. Re:My God, I'm old. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I don't watch so much TV I need a computer to track it all. I watch very little entertainment because it doesn't fit my daily schedule.

      Now insert TiVo, Myth, MediaCentre, or any one of the other DVRs.

      Suddenly, I can watch what I want, when I want. That's why TiVo is useful. Because it moves TV around to fit my life, if I find something interesting I can rewind it. You can capture those moments in sport and go "Look at this!".

      If you can't see that, if you can't realise they let you tweak entertainment to your life, then sorry.

      By the way, before you go on about us geeks who spend life in front of a PC and never go out, I need to shift television around various activities such as kayaking and rock climbing.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    4. Re:My God, I'm old. by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      Well, there's a different way of looking at it. You see, I don't have a lot of time to just sit there and watch tv either. However, there are occasions in which I find myself with an hour or two of free time, and just need to "veg out". It used to be that I could flip on discovery channel, tlc, pbs, etc. and find something both entertaining and useful. But the content lately has been so watered down, that what is on 99% of the time I find nauseating. And the 1% of good content that is left out there isn't on when I have downtime. And I refuse to change my schedule around to fit the tv schedule. That is what a dvr is good for, making the most of the tv watching experience.

      Now, those that already commit to 25 hours or more of tv viewing a week need to find something else, but if you only watch a couple of hours a week then a dvr can help keep those few hours from being totally wasted (i.e., you can make better use of the top 1% of content).

    5. Re:My God, I'm old. by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1
      Ah, a sensible reply. A rare thing on slash. I don't have cable or satellite for the same reason you mention, the vomit-inducing programming out there. And it's not TV that's getting worse, no sir, it's us, we're getting older. Also known as taste, or intelligence.

      But I've always found a VCR to be enough for time shifting. The only show I want to watch that's on too late for me is the Daily Show. I just have to make sure the piece of wire I use as an antenna is still in the RF IN connector of the VCR.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    6. Re:My God, I'm old. by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1
      You *need* to shift TV around? Addict!

      Look, I watch maybe two or three shows more or less regularly. I couldn't care less if I miss an episode. I mean, who gives a shit? Are you twelve years old? Do you go to school the next day and say "did you see..."?

      You are addicted. You are surrounding yourself with toys to keep the real world away. Grow up.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    7. Re:My God, I'm old. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the entire point. I don't need to move TV around, I selectively choose what to watch and when I want to watch it, because I don't have to match a timetable

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  13. ReplayTV by mangusman · · Score: 1

    ReplayTV is probably not going to survive either, which is really sad given that not all cable companies are offering bundled PVR services.

    1. Re:ReplayTV by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Didn't they go bankrupt two years ago? Seriously...I thought Replay was out of business. Am I wrong?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  14. Unhappy with Cable/Sat DVRs by MNeau · · Score: 1

    i've tried a few and they aren't even close to as usable as the TIVO, but its hard to compete with the price. From my experiences, TIVOs surprises have all be pleasant but with my cable and sat. I once told a friend, woudlnt it be cool if TIVO could... "yeah, it does it already" but with my dvrs, i start yelling at the boxes... WHY DID YOU DO THAT! its like no one has ever tried using their products. one of my second gen sat dvrs was far worse than a first release tivo. thats just my opinion, i know several people who would agree.

  15. And? by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm missing where the "death watch" comes from. They've lost some executives and their stock price is down. Is there any real bad news in there?

    But, since we've been told to start sharing our unininformed opinions:

    1) I don't see where turning TiVo into an Internet storage device is a huge win. Yeah, maybe it's a good idea and they should do it, but that will be just as easy for others to duplicate as the PVR business.

    2) I'm not sure whether Jarvis is hinting that they should become a warez enabler, but if he is, that's a dead-end business plan. As surely as piracy will continue to exist, that surely will it remain impossible to run a major business on that model in developed countries.

    1. Re:And? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      My uninformed opinion.

      Tivo is in a bit of trouble. They can only record analog, and they have no "in" with the cable companies, who are moving to digital. So, you have to rent a set top box, or deal with the basic channels. Scientific Atlanta, the mfgr of set top boxes for many cable co's has 2 models of DVR ( dual tuner, replaces set top box, deals with analog and digital, some models can do HD ). As noted elsewhere, Tivo's deal with DirectTV seems likely to fade away. Microsoft has that new media center thingy they are starting to push.

      They are no longer the only kid on the block, and some of the other players have some ability to lock Tivo out.

      So, they can look for opportunities to stay in thier current "space" or they can look for greener pastures.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  16. Ala-carte viewing by Aggrazel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would be nice if they could stream the TV shows off the internet so you could buy what channels (or what shows) you wanted ala-carte. I hate paying $40 a month for my cable when I only watch one network (ESPN) that isn't on the basic $10 a month list.

    1. Re:Ala-carte viewing by Kordmp · · Score: 1

      AMEN to that...heck and I wish my cable bill was $40/mth instead it is $130/mth.

    2. Re:Ala-carte viewing by wwonka74 · · Score: 1

      For everyone that beleives ala carte pricing is a good ideas how we do this instead:
      Any reality show - $5 per episode .. $2.50 for repeats
      History Channel - $7 for hour long episodes .. $4.50 for 30 minutes
      Espn - $3.00 per sports center/$25.00 per live sporting event.
      Any freedom a customer is given will be a freedom that is exploited by the providers of the service.

    3. Re:Ala-carte viewing by hawk · · Score: 1

      ESPN is one of the most expensive channels out there, if not the most expensive of the basic channels. It's a few bucks a month.

      The FCC seems to have looked seriously at mandating a la carte service, but concluded that it would actually drive prices up. (You would pay more for each channel that you *do* want due to the price increasees).

      I'm skeptical, but at least they looked.

      hawk

    4. Re:Ala-carte viewing by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Dish Network tried this, but it wasn't profitable.

      The problem was that people would call up to subscribe to a channel, watch it for a few times, then call up again to unsubscribe. The result was that there was tons of administrative overhead from tons of people subscribing to single channels for a few hours once a week. I'm sure it drove their labor costs through the roof.

      Now, perhaps some kind of comprimise can be made-- for instance, offer a channel for a minimum of one month, but you'd have to talk a major TV provider into it which will be hard in this day and age.

    5. Re:Ala-carte viewing by n8_f · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of problems with a la carte. First, there is a fixed cost to providing any cable service at all, so there would have to be a charge of probably around $15 just to be able to order a channel.

      Second, the infrastructure doesn't support it yet. You need to have an all-digital infrastructure with cable boxes that support per channel filtering. I'm not sure where the cable set top boxes are, but there is still a lot of analog infrastructure out there. It will probably be phased out by the end of the decade, but until then you would have to pay for the analog basic cable package.

      Third, and I think biggest, is that currently the niche networks get somewhere around a dime a subscriber, maybe a quarter, as part of large channel bundles. The big players, like ESPN and Discovery, negotiate their own deals separately with each provider and get a buck or two per subscriber. If you switch to an opt-in, a la carte model, suddenly that revenue stream for all of those niche networks is cut by a factor of ten or a hundred or even more. They have to make up for that lost revenue and they can't do it with advertising, because they have just lost a bunch of market share. All of those people that stop on their channel when randomly flipping have just disapppeared, so their ratings and therefore ad rates have decreased. So now they've got to charge at least a buck or two per subscriber, which is going to get marked up by the cable providers. So by the time you get the five channels you really want, you are already paying as much as you were with the basic digital cable option. It isn't going to increase diversity in programming and will probably hurt it because market share is going to be concentrated in the few major brands that people will automatically get, like Discovery, ESPN and HBO, while niche channels like Sci-Fi will drop to the hard core scifi fans and subsequently whither and die. A show like Battlestar Galactica would never have made it to a second season (or been produced in the first place, for that matter) because a lot of the people that watched it aren't the type that would subscribe to Sci-Fi.

      Really, a la carte pricing doesn't make much economic sense, because the incremental costs of providing a ton of channels versus one channel are very small. The real costs of cable TV come from the network, primarily infrastructure costs (upgrading to digital and set-top boxes) and corporate profits. If you are really interested in lowering you cable bill, then you should focus on better models for management of that infrastructure. I think a for-profit monopoly, especially one that is only nominally regulated, has proven to be very inefficient (for everyone but shareholders). My current favorite model is community-owned infrastructure (preferably fiber) run by a publicly accountable non-profit, preferably one with a publicly elected board of directors.

    6. Re:Ala-carte viewing by lgw · · Score: 1

      There's no reason to expect ala-carte pricing to be any cheaper, since the cable company still has complete control over the pricing. However much the cable company has to charge per channel to make the same revenue (or to convince people that they don't really want ala-carte pricing), they will.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  17. TIVO monthly fee sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The single primary reason I haven't purchased a DVR is it's hard to get one without a service attached. I want a digital VCR, nothing more, nothing less. I don't have time to tinker something together, so I've been waiting for a package deal that will literally give me the functions of a VCR, but on a hard drive.

    TIVO doesn't; it sells you a service and controls you and what you put on the box.

    No wonder their business model is failing.

    1. Re:TIVO monthly fee sucks by lmsig · · Score: 1

      Funny. I don't FEEL like Tivo is controlling me. I guess that explains all the joy I get from owning it?

      --
      .plan!! what plan?
  18. Sounds great by TrippTDF · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Content aggregation sounds like a great idea, but remember that cable companies have a lot of exisiting ties with the media companies that actually produce the content. Even if Tivo starts doing this, the second they turn profitable the cable companies will play their relationships (I've worked in entertainment... the whole industry is about the relationships) with the media companies to undercut Tivo and get them out. I like the idea of Tivo, but I think the company is fighting an uphill battle.

    I say they get bought by Comcast or Time Warner before the end of the decade.

  19. Long Live Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There is no DVR out there better then Tivo. I know some people think their $1000 MythTV box is great but that aint for the masses. Windows Media center def isnt there yet. Tivo rocks and I dont know why everyone has put this death sentence on it. How can Tivo survive, release some new boxes with enhanced features ie. a mass market HD Box w/ Multiple tuners(like the one they have for direct tv already), a regular box with multiple tuners, integrated wired or wireless networking. Add some of those features and heck, I will even buy another one. LONG LIVE TIVO!!

  20. I want my IP TV by steelem · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously Tivo, make it happen - screw cable companies, start making deals with history channel, discovery, etc. and provide their content on demand. That will be the only way forward. And when is this netflix deal going to be a reality in terms of service? Hurry, there's not much time for you guys...

    1. Re:I want my IP TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TiVo (The company) isn't setup to handle something like that. They are more in the products world than the services world.

    2. Re:I want my IP TV by steelem · · Score: 1

      You are probably right, but if Tivo steps back and takes inventory of what they have, they will see an awesome brand, an awesome interface, an a fairly good installed base. Their current product, though, doesn't compete well against cable company products (fanboy fanatacism aside). Time to think outside the box and become a leader in a related field that they are positioned extremely well for...

  21. I think ReplayTV has the patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I recall, ReplayTV has the most relevant patents on this technology. That is part of how they've been able to hang for so long with a smaller market share; their competitors (including the cable DVR makers) pay them royalties on every sale.

  22. I don't watch TV, why would I want a TIVO? by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    I am curious why you categorize this as a "hater"?

    I do not watch TV, I do not have cable or satellite. I do watch DVDs for which I have a suitable TV for them.

    I think TIVO is a nice technology but I have zero use for one. Best of luck to them. Don't classify those of us who do not watch TV as "haters"

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:I don't watch TV, why would I want a TIVO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a lot of people (maybe it's a vocal minority) who don't watch TV are so snobbish about their position. Not saying everyone who doesn't watch TV has this attitude, but when articles like this come up on Slashdot or on any other forums, you inevitably get those non-TV-watchers who swear they are better than the rest of the world because they don't watch TV.

      Live and let live. If you watch TV, good. If you don't, good. Don't think you're better or worse.

  23. Tivo box after TIVO exits by essaunders · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not to sound pessimistic, but what happens to all the Tivo boxes if the subscription Tivo relies on goes away? Can they be converted to work with other schedulers? Would they at least maintain a basic 'dumb' disk-based VCR like capability?

    1. Re:Tivo box after TIVO exits by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Would they at least maintain a basic 'dumb' disk-based VCR like capability?

      Yes. If your TiVo can't download programming info, you can set it up to act like the dumb PVRs that the cable companies provide. You just set it to manually record a particuar channel at a particular time.

      Any season passes would stop being recorded because those rely on the programming info.

      In theory, one of the last things TiVo could do if, god forbid, they went out of business would be to change to some sort of 'open' programming format that someone else could maintain.

      In the meantime, I'm busy recruiting others into the cult of the TiVo.

    2. Re:Tivo box after TIVO exits by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Informative

      Canadians with TiVo are already doing this since they don't have access to the official TiVo service. Presumably, we'd have to start doing it in the US, too. The basic idea is that you have a "dummy TiVo service" for your box to log into. The dummy service, in turn, downloads programming info in XML format, much like MythTV. The data is then reparsed so that the Tivo unit can understand it. I'm just praying someone will make a Knoppix CD that can automate all that if/when the time comes.

    3. Re:Tivo box after TIVO exits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. If your TiVo can't download programming info, you can set it up to act like the dumb PVRs that the cable companies provide. You just set it to manually record a particuar channel at a particular time.

      That's not true with the Series 2 Tivo boxes. They are cheaper because you HAVE TO get the Tivo service.

    4. Re:Tivo box after TIVO exits by Salmonax · · Score: 1

      Yes, TiVo boxes can function as a VCR with no connection to the outside world. It would be a horrible waste of the technology, but it would still do something.

    5. Re:Tivo box after TIVO exits by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      I know for a fact that this is not the case.

      I was out of town for a month when the power went out at my house. My cable modem did not reboot properly, so my TiVo couldn't connect to get programming info and it ran out of programming info. My season passes were not recorded, but my manual program was recorded.

      Also if you go to the TiVo web site, in their FAQs they say how the TiVo will operate if you don't use their service. (Or at least it used to)

    6. Re:Tivo box after TIVO exits by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I'm sure you can get MythTV running on it, and then you've got a virtually limitless supply of reliable, expandable front-end systems.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    7. Re:Tivo box after TIVO exits by Ondo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to sound pessimistic, but what happens to all the Tivo boxes if the subscription Tivo relies on goes away? Can they be converted to work with other schedulers? Would they at least maintain a basic 'dumb' disk-based VCR like capability?

      Series 1 boxes stay as 'dumb' VCRs. Series 2 boxes, apparently not.

      However, the TiVo is very hackable, and people (reportedly) know how to add guide data. Such hacks are unreleased now out of respect for TiVo, but if they go out of business they'll probably be available.

    8. Re:Tivo box after TIVO exits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply providing the guide data (and doing no box, feature, or business development) is quite cheap and profitable, so if other operations were shut down, it's likely TiVo or a successor company could easily continue the service for existing customers.

      As a similar example, ReplayTV's owners have gone bankrupt/been sold twice and no new boxes are being developed, but Denon/Marantz stepped in and will be maintaining the service effectively in perpetuity. Also, UK TiVos are still being served.

  24. The first out of the gate almost always loses by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple had the first GUI, but it lost to the Windows. Dreamcast came out first, but lost to the PS2. Sony was first with Beta, but lost to VHS. And Diamond Multimedia came out with the first MP3 player, but TOTALLY lost out to Apple!

    I would be MORE shocked if Tivo actually survived.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... No. Xerox had the first GUI; Apple bought it. And that which led to the GUI was done at SRL.

      Further, VHS was first. 1950s. A "VCR" made by the first VHS company cost $50,000. Sony worked for 20 years to bring it down to $500.

      And I'm sure someone did TiVo before TiVo, and someone did the MP3 player before Diamond.

      Do your damn homework.

    2. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Gee, I don't remember Xerox ever selling a computer with their GUI. It's kind of hard to succeed in the market place when you don't sell a product.

      And once again, Sony was the FIRST to sell its video recorders to consumers.

      And since you've been wrong twice already, I doubt that your opinions on Tivo or Diamond have much credibility either.

      Who should be checking their facts, moron?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by hastings14 · · Score: 1
      I've got to agree with you here...

      Remember when the big "on-line" services were Prodigy and Compuserve and AOL was smalltime? And then there was poor Netscape, crushed by Microsoft. Some bright, small company always puts in the initial R&D, and then a bigger player swoops in...

      This reminds me some of @Home Corp., though. @Home had deals with the cable companies to provide their broadband internet service, but when the product was ready to go mainstream they pulled the contracts, took the technology, and did it themselves. Here they created enough excitement about TIVO to make sure it had investors and to keep them innovating, but when it comes time for the big rollout... see ya' suckers...

    4. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      Gee, I don't remember Xerox ever selling a computer with their GUI. It's kind of hard to succeed in the market place when you don't sell a product.

      Then, you obviously don't remember the Xerox Star

      Other links to information via Google...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    5. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Even if Xerox was "out of the gate" first with the Star, IT STILL PROVES MY POINT! The company that has a product first usually loses!

      And as to whether Xerox was first "out of the gate" is highly debatable because they were not sold to CONSUMERS!!! Heck, it appears they weren't even sold to businesses! I.e., no one bought one.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    6. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then, you obviously don't remember the Xerox Star

      Other links to information via Google...


      Anita = Slashdot Newbie? Welcome to Slashdot


      If not, then shame shame shame. LOL

    7. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      Oh - I wasn't meaning to imply that your point wasn't valid, just that Xerox did market a computer with a GUI long before Apple's Lisa.

      No, it wasn't marketed to consumers, like the Lisa and later the Mac was - it was a b2b marketing, because only a business at the time could afford one. But just because it is b2b, doesn't mean it wasn't marketed.

      Furthermore, I know for a fact a few were bought, because a couple were donated to the San Diego Computer Museum and are on display (can't remember if they are running or not, I don't think they are)...

      Even with all this, though, first guy (and nearly second guy - the Lisa bombed, too!) out lost...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    8. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Why do you have to start with the name-calling?

      You guys are talking apples and oranges here. Apple was the first company to sell a GUI on a personal computer, but it was not the first GUI. Military computers / research computers had GUI well before Apple did. Can you guess who made those? I'll give you a hint...not Apple.

      And you are again arguing about different things with the video recorders. Sony sold the first video recorder to the public, but Ampex first developed the technology in the 1950's.

      Before you start being rude and calling names, why don't you read what the person is saying? In terms of marketable products, you are correct. In terms of industry 'firsts' you are wrong.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    9. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks for the information on the Star. I had never heard of it before. It was certainly an advanced system. On thing I really like about Xerox's approach was that the screen approximated the size and dimensions of a sheet of paper. The engineers were truly trying to create a paperless office.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    10. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by faedle · · Score: 1

      Apple didn't "lose" to Windows. You're assuming this is a zero-sum game.

      Apple Computer, as a company, continues to thrive and pay reasonable dividends to it's stockholders. On a technical level, Apple's OS is widely considered superior by many in the industry.

      The only "losers" when Windows came out were Atari and Commodore-Amiga: only the latter platform exists in any real context, and that's even highly debatable.

    11. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      Diamond also had *THE WORST SOFTWARE* known to man. I bought a Rio 500 as soon as it was available. That crap they shipped with the thing would make me an mp3 and then not even recognize the mp3 that it just created, so I couldn't upload anything to the Rio.

      I plugged it into my Mac when iTunes came around, and never looked back at the Diamond software at all.

    12. Re:The first out of the gate almost always loses by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      XEROX PARC was always "ahead of the curve", but they couldn't market things worth beans. One "product" they had in the late 1980's or so, which we see echos of today was a concept they called "tabs, pads, and boards"...

      In this office system, boards were essentially "electronic whiteboards" - large video monitors with special "pens" that could "draw" on the display. A group could sit around this display with their "pads" (which were about the size of PDA, maybe a bit larger) - and all could participate in the presentation wirelessly! What one person drew on a pad showed up on the board, and on other's pads - and what was drawn on the board would show up on the pads as well. It was implied that the data was stored on a server somewhere for later recall. Lastly, the "tabs" were "smart badges" - little badges with small LCD displays and other electronics that could allow the system to do such things as sense where a wearer was in the office, and if the phone was ringing for him, the nearest phone would ring in a custom "ring tone" for that user. Also, the workstations would "auto config" for the user in front of them based on the wearer's tab badge.

      The echos of all this we see today, but not in a cohesive, well thought out whole as in the PARC system: electronic whiteboards can be purchased, but they are closer to large dry-erase touch tablets than anything else, and very expensive (some companies *do* make large "whiteboard" like video monitor systems for such distance colaboration as well). PDAs have become the "pads" of the system - if they have wireless capability and the software to auto-sync (which is probably something custom and varies from PDA to PDA, as well as among electronic whiteboard manufacturers). Tabs are still dormant, though RFID comes close, and some people have built simple LCD-type name badges for hobby projects - a combo would come close. Even so, with all of this - the integration of the PARC system isn't there...

      Someday, it may be - it will probably be a while, though. I also seriously think that virtual reality technology is going to follow the same pattern. It is almost begging to be born again - we have cheap rendering engines for both video and 3D spatialized sound, what is lacking is high-res, high field-of-view, cheap head mounted displays (HMDs) - I expect the OLEDs might prove a popular technology for this once the price comes down more. There is still an issue on the input device (most glove technology is locked up in patent issues still) - but a simple 6DOF 3D tracked pistol-style joystick would suffice for most entertainment as well as other applications where deep interaction isn't needed...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  25. TiVo will fail. by EvilMagnus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The sad truth is this: TiVo will fail.

    The reasons are simple:

    1. The cable companies are rolling their own DVRs. TiVo failed to get traction here, and it will kill them.

    2. TiVo has hobbled itself. There were features out there that could have helped them (essentially value adds above and beyond the cable company DVRs), but they were too slow to market, and too restrictive in their implementation. Examples: TiVo to Go. Network-able TiVos. Commercial skip. Good features, but TiVo hobbled them (or implemented them late) either through proprietary standards or by not officially advertising them to Joe Sixpack.

    --
    -EvilMagnus
    1. Re:TiVo will fail. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Not that it was really their fault they had to become more restrictive. The media companies have the distribution companies by the balls.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:TiVo will fail. by Butt · · Score: 1

      I agree that TiVo will fail, but I don't really think it has that much to do with their feature set. At the moment, the features people are clammoring for here (DVD burning, HD, etc) might have reduced the number of people who drop their subscription (churn), but it wouldn't have grown their user base to a point that they could compete as an independent device maker against the "almost good enough" DVRs of the cable cos.

      It's all about vertical integration. Just as you can't just launch a product and get it on your supermarket shelves unless you're Proctor and Gamble or a few others, the media equipment market is in no way "open", because of the integration between programme owners and distributors. At the moment the Cable MSO's / aggregators hold all the cards, because they have the highest barriers to entry. They happen to have (for the most part) the same money that makes the programmes, so any MSO who backs Tivo (particularly a Tivo that is less "hobbled" as many here want) is going to be punished by the big programme owners.

      I think they had an Internet business model in an old-media market environment. The Tivo of the future will be about IP television, where distribution isn't the bottleneck and there will be a raft of a la carte programming available. Microsoft (and to a lesser degree Apple) will slowly drive this - it will still be a niche market (you won't be getting "desperate housewives" or other event programming on it) but lower overheads will make it profitable enough. Unfortunately for TiVo, it's hard to see what they have (other than some very experienced people) that Microsoft or Apple would want to acquire. Both those companies can roll their own software pretty effectively. If Apple does acquire, I think they can afford to sit for a couple of months and drive the stock value down even further.

      All this is a real shame for TiVo, and seeing as there have been some gratuitous political comments in this thread, I'll just note that this is a great case study on how the production of "faith in the market" to produce innovative goods and services in the most efficient way is the biggest con job in history, as economists increasingly realise. Not that the market is bad, it just can't deal with infrastructure as well as it can with products that use it.

  26. Too Many Tivo Posts! by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can TiVo Be Saved? - Feb. 22 (Answer: NO)

    Will New Apps Keep TiVo Afloat? - Feb. 16 (Answer: NO)

    Has TiVo's Fate Been Sealed? Jan. 17 (Answer: NO)

    The No's have it now Die TiVo Die!

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    1. Re:Too Many Tivo Posts! by Fedhax · · Score: 1

      Umm...

      Has TiVO's Fate Been Sealed?: NO

      Wouldn't that kinda mean that TiVO still has a chance? Following that logic, it is only 2-1 on the ol' pitch count.

    2. Re:Too Many Tivo Posts! by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

      Errr damn it you caught me. Yeah that was a mistake. Should have been YES!

      --
      News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    3. Re:Too Many Tivo Posts! by UnHolyRam · · Score: 1

      Can TiVo Be Saved? - Feb. 22 (Answer: NO)

      Will New Apps Keep TiVo Afloat? - Feb. 16 (Answer: NO)

      Has TiVo's Fate Been Sealed? Jan. 17 (Answer: NO)

      The No's have it now Die TiVo Die!


      Uhh sounds like your contradictings yourself and have already sealed their fate.

    4. Re:Too Many Tivo Posts! by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

      OK I'll give it to the first guy for catching me on my mistake, but not gonna give any credit to someone who rips on me and uses the word "contradictings"! Its like I made a mistake on my TPS reports!

      --
      News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  27. lamer by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1

    The "blogs aren't news!" meme is so January.

    Be ready for March, we all decide that Firefox sucks for some reason.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  28. Free TiVo? by EvilGoodGuy · · Score: 1

    Is TiVo free? Last I heard no.
    In which case expect me to take no part in it.
    Sorry TiVo, but I like my money in my pocket.

    1. Re:Free TiVo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You must be very, very hungry. Suppose you got your computer for free and are stealing WiFi.

    2. Re:Free TiVo? by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is TiVo free? Last I heard no. In which case expect me to take no part in it. Sorry TiVo, but I like my money in my pocket.

      That's funny!

      Indeed, everything should always be free. We should all get paid for doing our work, but should be able to get all of the stuff and services we want for free. That would be perfect! And then, cool new free companies would have all sorts of incentives to hire lots of people to invent even cooler new things that they'd give away for free! Excellent! Everyone would just have all sorts of money, and all sorts of cool things, too! Fantastic!

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Free TiVo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I love my free cable service, which is played on my free TV, which is all kept running by the free power I get each month. Not to mention the free car I drive to and from work, kept running by free gas and free routine & major maintenance.

      What? You mean you pay for those services? That's crazy talk. If Tivo should be free, the rest of should be free too.

    4. Re:Free TiVo? by EvilGoodGuy · · Score: 1

      Who told you about the WiFi?!
      *hides in corner*
      I meant it as more of a, not worth the money in my opinion type thing, not a "everything should be free" sense.

  29. Star Trek Enterprise, Arrested Development, etc.. by fz00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With all these online petitions to save these series with cult followings, you'd think that TiVo would see that as an opportunity. Imagine buying shows at $1 an episode. Or a full season for a discount. TiVo really needs to turn itself into a delivery platform if it wants to survive. I'm surprised they haven't done it already. I hate to say it but with my ReplayTV, I effictively get free cable via Poopli . I do this because such a service is not available. I would pay if one did exist though... less work!

  30. BSD / IPods by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    This isnt anything like The death of BSD or the Ipod Killers is it.
    After reading partialy over the artical it apears not ,I was shocked to discover that this claim of the death of tivo actualy has some foundation in reality.
    It would be a shame to see it die , I would own one except for the fact i dont really own a TV and they are not commen in my part of the world.
    If tivo wants to be saved , tivo needs to get its name out there , and it needs to start selling(obvious statment of the year) .If i were to ask my family if they wanted a tivo they would reply to me "Whats a tivo" , I know alot of people who could really use a product of this nature , they just have no idea it exists .
    Adding functionaly and features may help it get some positive marketing , which i belive is really lacking (as much as i dislike marketing , i know its needed). the last i heard of tivo on the news was a few years ago(regular news , not tech sites)

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  31. Buy-out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously Tivo needs to be bought-out by one of the major cable providers, but it would appear the window for that is closing fast since they seem to be opting to compete with rather than usurp Tivo.

  32. DirectTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but they already teamed up with DirectTV so they should stay alive if not just through that service.

    1. Re:DirectTV? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      DirectTV announced that they plan on rolling their own DVR.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  33. What about DirecTivo by mprinkey · · Score: 1

    I have a few DirecTivo units and honestly, I was on the verge of cancelling DirecTV until I got them. Now, I don't want to give them up. Has DirecTV licensed the Tivo software permanently or is it licensed per system? I know DirecTV is actively promoting DirecTivo sales. The ability to record two shows at the same time is a big win! And the Tivo interface is far superior to the other options (say from Dish).

    1. Re:What about DirecTivo by PrimalChrome · · Score: 1

      Actually you'll note that DirecTV is not marketing them as DirecTivo any longer. About a year or so ago they began referring to the units as DirecTV DVRs. They also removed the Tivo logo from the remotes.

  34. HD PVRs by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1
    HD PVRs are really where the cable companies are taking off in the Tivo-like arena. Tivo and Satellite TV companies can't compete with my Time Warner Cable HD PVR capability at $10 a month, including the service and hardware.

    The SA8300-HD PVR is really quite good. And it has an HDMI output to boot.

  35. Investment by essreenim · · Score: 1
    I'm surprised that I haven't heard more about TiVo wielding them to threaten the cable providers who bundle PVRs.

    It sounds like TiVo need to get financial backing of investors if they are to compete with the big cable comanies. Then if they ever need to sue for patent violation etc. they would at least have the money. I hope this doesn't happen though. The best thing might be to merge with a cable company and completely redefine their product.

  36. Aggregate video content from the Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Let's be honest, a Tivo that depends on Internet video content rather than cable providers will not sell. As much as I like watching 2 minute Star Wars Kid videos, the content just isn't there. When I come home from work, I want to watch last night's Daily Show, or 24, etc. This is a dumb idea until you get the networks to provide quality content over the Internet, and good luck with that.

    1. Re:Aggregate video content from the Internet? by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

      What about nixing cable all together ...

      In order to download someone elses cable feed.
      Maybe allready commercial removed? ... The Dude

  37. This just in: Tivo passes 3 million subscribers by EulerX07 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kinda funny that I finish reading an article on news.com about them exceeding 3 million subscribers, to find out on slashdot that it's dying.

    Is it dying faster or slower then Apple and BSD?

    Disclaimer: Not a Tivo subscriber. I'd like to, but you can't get some of that in Canada.

    1. Re:This just in: Tivo passes 3 million subscribers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.tivocanada.com/

      You have to be an expert level linux hacker to get it runnning though.

    2. Re:This just in: Tivo passes 3 million subscribers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what is going on with Tivo at the present time, but I can say that Apple is not dying. Most people who state things like this have either A). Never used a Mac or B). Used it in the OS 9 and below days. I was very anti-mac and anti-apple until a friend of mine asked me why I didn't like them and I had no real reason.

      Will they ever be as prominent as Windows? Maybe not, but they are here now, have been here, and will continue to be here as the innovators of technology.

    3. Re:This just in: Tivo passes 3 million subscribers by doormat · · Score: 1

      Is it dying faster or slower then Apple and BSD?

      More imporantly, when will Netcraft confirm it?

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  38. Cue economics 101 by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. "My cable company's DVR works just fine, why should I pay extra for a TiVO?"

    A cable DVR from Crime-Warner is like $8 a month and does several things SA Tivos don't do, like digital sound and HD, and doesn't require hackery like IR emitters and glacial channel changing speeds.

    I'll agree that it's substandard software to be sure, but when ordinary people make decisions it comes down to money -- an SA Tivo takes YEARS (box + lifetime) before its ROI exceeds the cable box, and the cable box can be traded in through a cable retail store any time for a newer box.

    It's not that Tivo isn't better, but to most people the "better" doesn't matter, the worse does (IR hackery, no HD, etc), and it's a much more expensive hardware INVESTMENT.

    1. Re:Cue economics 101 by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

      Yes, "glacial" was the word I was looking for..main reason I would never get a TIVO.

      --
      "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
    2. Re:Cue economics 101 by powerlord · · Score: 1
      A cable DVR from Crime-Warner is like $8 a month and does several things SA Tivos don't do, like digital sound and HD, and doesn't require hackery like IR emitters and glacial channel changing speeds.


      Just out of curiousity, what percentage of cable TV users have HD TVs? Not HD-Ready, but real, honest to goodness HD tuners and are enjoying HD Content?

      I've seen a lot of people complaining that TiVOs don't have HD and digital audio support, and I'm confused and impressed that so many people seem to have HD TVs and home theater systems set up.

      Granted I'm living in a 1 bedroom apartment in Manhattan, so I'm suprised they have the space, but I also don't know very many people who've bothered with the expense (yet).

      Granted those numbers will change over time (one of the reasons I got the Toshiba DVD+TiVO was that it can put out an interlaced signal), but is there that much demand yet or are those just the more vocal people?
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    3. Re:Cue economics 101 by swb · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiousity, what percentage of cable TV users have HD TVs? Not HD-Ready, but real, honest to goodness HD tuners and are enjoying HD Content?

      I disagree with your split between "HD ready", which I interpret as a TV with DVI/component inputs fully capable of displaying an HD signal, and the same set with an over-the-air ATSC tuner. Nobody really watches TV OTA anymore, so it's a moot distinction.

      Crime-Warner has had HD boxes forever (I have one), and while the amount of content is kind of thin (sports, headlining network shows, HBO), it's definitely there.

      Digital audio is even more important -- almost ALL the digital cable movie channels show their movies with 5.1 sound, and not being able to record this is a crime. Splitting the audio path doesn't help, as the Tivo introduces a meaningful delay between picture and audio.

    4. Re:Cue economics 101 by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Ah. Hadn't thought about that. If you're right about what defines a set as HD-Ready then you're right and the split is, mostly, meaningless (at least within the markets that we are discussing). I'll ask instead what percentage of the population (cable population, or Tivo population), has a TV capable of showing an HD signal?

      I know lots of people who went out and switched to digital cable for the channels, but for the most part, most of them are using TVs that are 5-10 years old still. Heck, I just bought my TV in '98 and the TV I had before that was from '86. While not being able to record 5.1 sound might be bad, I again am curious what percentage of the TV viewing population has a 5.1 setup and would notice the difference.

      Not disagreeing that it would be nice if they had an HD Tivo ready now, just that it isn't practical until the CableCARD standard is rolled out, and I'm wondering how much of their user population would have benefitted.

      Check out Tivo's press releases from the past CES BTW for the upcoming Tivo box that looks like it will address all your concerns.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    5. Re:Cue economics 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, most people I've known don't realize that their VCR coax output was never stereo.
      I laugh when we a/v freaks think we're typical.

      'Course, I want all these features now...

    6. Re:Cue economics 101 by swb · · Score: 1

      Your point that the broader TV viewing population is too dumb/naive/uneducated/unequipped to take advantage of newer technology is taken, but these are also the same clowns that are going to use the cable company DVR because the difference between Tivo and the cable DVR also escapes them.

      But those people are also not Tivo's market; it's for people with the money and willingness to get into the better gear.

      CableCARD is already out, the FCC requires they support it. It's mildly crippled, but would be more than adequate now. Tivo is letting the cable companies defeat them.

  39. Well... by Adapt+or+Die · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A good number of TiVo subscribers subscribe through DirecTV and their DirecTiVo feature. Cheaper monthy rate, dual tuners, etc. I know, because I am one of them.

    So, when DirecTV releases information like this about them releasing their own DVR later this year, TiVo proper stands to lose a lot of its market share. There was also the issue between TiVo and Comcast where TiVo pulled itself from a deal with the cable company. Lots of folks believe this was a bad move as well.

    The only good news on the DirecTV side is that DTV is currently rolling out a new software update for those who own the present DirecTiVo machines. What impact they feel this will have on the forthcoming DirecTV branded machines is uncertain. (i.e. Is this the first of a string of new updates to DirecTiVo... or is this the final nod to the collaboration?)

  40. Good enough is all people will pay for by branchingfactor · · Score: 1

    The key benefits of a DVR are to let people time shift their viewing, and to let people skip portions of a show they're not interested in watching (e.g. commercials, boring scenes, innane commentary). The key features of a DVR are the ability to easily record a scheduled show or a scheduled series (first run only, or first run and repeats), and to provide VCR-like controls on live TV. Even the most rudimentary cable DVRs provide that functionality, and that's good enough for most people if it's cheap.

    Comcast charges $5/month for a Motorola HD DVR with only two tuners and 14 hours of high definition recording. The difference between having that mediocre DVR and not having one is huge, and well worth $5/month. The difference between having a Tivo and the motorola is small and not work more than $0.50/month. If so, then why would anyone pay $200 for a low end Tivo box that can't record high def plus $12.95/month for the mandatory Tivo channel guide?

    Tivo is seriously deluded about the value of their product in a world where DVRs are a commodity item. They had the first mover advantage, but they blew it. They are going down.

  41. Just Bought One! by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    Oh my bad timing! I just bought a TiVo yesterday! Actually, I've been concerned about whether or not TiVo would survive for a long time now, especially with the cable companies beginning to offer DVR services. But I weighed everything and decided on TiVo because I think that it is likely that the service will survive in one form or another. TiVo is a relatively strong brand which I'm sure someone will pick up, if the company fails. I also wanted to actually own my own DVR rather than renting it from Comcast. I thought about building my own using MythTV or something similar, but I don't have time for that and the TiVo service itself is what made the final sale for me. Besides, the various TiVo hacks that have developed will make the box useful to me for a long time.

    1. Re:Just Bought One! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      " I also wanted to actually own my own DVR rather than renting it from Comcast."

      How does that make sense, if you're paying more for your subscription to TiVO than for the rental on the Comcast box?

      Seriously...I'm trying to justify keeping TiVO after my six-month gift subscription expires.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Just Bought One! by blueZhift · · Score: 1
      How does that make sense, if you're paying more for your subscription to TiVO than for the rental on the Comcast box?

      It would cost me about $10/month to rent the Comcast DVR, but eventually I'd have to give the DVR back to them if I changed cable provider or went to satellite, etc.. And I certainly couldn't hack or modify the box in any way. With the TiVo box, I own it regardless of who my cable provider is, and there are apparently a number of hacks and mods that should keep it useful to me for some time to come. Oh, the other catch with Comcast is that you have to subscribe to digital cable to get the DVR, so I would have the additional cost of digital cable on top of the DVR monthly fee which would be greater than the $13/month for the TiVo service. I'll probably get digital cable eventually, but right now standard is just fine.

  42. Parnter with Apple? by UncleGizmo · · Score: 1

    ...since Apple's strategy is to be in the content storage/management business [iPod], how cool would it be to have a Tivo-pod [tPod?] for all your video content?

    or is that just crazytalk?

    --
    Who put this thing together? Me, that's who.
    1. Re:Parnter with Apple? by praxis · · Score: 1

      http://www.portablemediacentermag.com/

      Or buy a portable media center.

  43. Look at it this way... by skogs · · Score: 1
    Two major executives have left the company. This leaves room for improvement. Somebody new has to rise up to that position, hopefully somebody with that will have a better percentage of winning battles for the marketplace. Perhaps this is a good thing.

    The stock is indeed low, with upper management changes happening fast. Excellent product, and they don't get involved with crap they don't need to.

    I just pushed $15,000 from my portfolio that wasn't doing anything into TiVo stock. We'll see where it goes. Could disappear, could go up in a fiarly significant manner.

    I believe in TiVo's product whole heartedly. Maybe TiVo will more agressively attack the market, perhaps they will be bought out at a fair price. Both cases I win.

    --
    Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
  44. TV Needs To Die by kiwidefunkt · · Score: 2, Funny

    After all, TV cancelled Firefly and Family Guy. Wait, just Fox. Just Fox needs to die.

    --
    www.kiwilyrics.com - a wiki for lyrics
    1. Re:TV Needs To Die by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I thought both those shows kind of sucked.

      If it makes you feel better, Cartoon Network shows the very few Family Guy episodes over and over and over and over again on their Adult Swim lineup. And over and over... showing re-runs for 3 years is something, but showing re-runs for 3 years when it's just the same 13 episodes over and over again? That's a little tiresome.

    2. Re:TV Needs To Die by kiwidefunkt · · Score: 0
      I thought both those shows kind of sucked.
      No one really cares what you thought of those shows. Family Guy's DVDs sold so well Fox decided to bring it back, and Firefly's DVDs sold so well they decided to make a major motion picture to tie up the series.

      Not saying "Your taste is wrong," but saying "Fox made a huge mistake. These shows make money and have fans, but were cancelled."

      Thus, Fox should die.
      --
      www.kiwilyrics.com - a wiki for lyrics
  45. What is Tivo? by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that Tivo is another intermediary, just the sort of thing that the internet was designed to replace. Sure it's a cool intermediary, but why would I want a piece of quasi-computer equipment, when my computer would very easily do the exact same thing? Granted, I don't really watch television, and watch movies on my laptop, but I fail to see the attraction. I actually find the possibility of watching, or downloading, movies on my mobile!

    So, what can Tivo do form me, that a Mac-Mini-profile computer cannot? This is the crux of the discussion in my oppinion.

    1. Re:What is Tivo? by lmsig · · Score: 1

      Think about it like this.

      Tivo is not the box you purchase. Tivo is the software + integrated system. What you get with Tivo is everything done for you. You do not have to do anything but plug it in and go.

      Sure I could make a MythTV box. That would be a waste of my time if I can just get an integrated solution (with support, upgrades, etc all done for me) for $12.95 a month.

      So yea. if someone made an easy system for the mac mini, it would be no problem. Maybe Tivo should do just that. However, their boxes are basically free after rebate ($99 is very cheap for the hard drive + remote + cables, processor, etc), you get a nice remote, and it doesn't look stupid in your entertainment center.

      --
      .plan!! what plan?
  46. TiVo - Too Little, Too Late by jo42 · · Score: 1

    I have a widescreen TV and my cable company gives me 18+ HDTV channels. I hardly watch the regular, or even allegedly 'digital' channels anymore. TiVo doesn't fit into the picture here. They should have started doing HDTV PVR's. To quote a very wise cartoon character, the Scientifc Atlanta boxes still suck a**.

    1. Re:TiVo - Too Little, Too Late by sho222 · · Score: 1

      I call FUD. Tivo has an HD recorder, and best of all, it's integrated with DirecTV.

      It's a recent addition to their line, so you might have a point with the "too late" bit, but it's definitely not "too little."

    2. Re:TiVo - Too Little, Too Late by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Don't work with cable, do it?

      I repeat "Too Little, Too Late"...

  47. Household Name Syndrome. by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tivo made a certain kind of impact, the kind where their name has become a verb for recording TV. That does not guarantee long term success of course.

    Today we xerox on a Canon. It's probably a bit previous-generation, but every refrigerator was a Frigidaire, even when Frigidaire's market share had dwindled. In lots of places, every soft drink is a "coke". I've heard different convenience stores being referred to as "the 7-Eleven". And so on.

    Tivo might have lasted just long enough to spawn this effect. "I missed the show but I Tivo'd it."

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  48. Re:Star Trek Enterprise, Arrested Development, etc by DaFrogBoy · · Score: 1

    I like this concept. Ever since I got a Tivo, I only watch things I've recorded previously. I no longer sit and just see what's on. So rather than pay for all the shows on all of the channels, why not let me pick the SHOWS a la carte? I have about 4-5 shows a week I watch on a regular basis, and my wife has about the same. At $5 a month per show, we would actually pay less than what our monthly cable costs.

  49. uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're posting on and I presume reading slashdot, therefore you have no right to judge anyone's choice of time-waster.

  50. Re:About TiVo tsarkon reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own a Tivo. Sony SVR2000 with two upgraded hard drives and a hacked in network card.

    First off, Tivo sues people for having backup images of Tivos online. Thanks for not allowing me to easily restore my base software image.

    Then Tivo charges OUTRAGEOUS rates for HDTV capable devices.

    Then Tivo wont transfer the lifetime sub. to a new unit - thanks jerks. Better hope my motherboard never dies.

    Then Tivo doesnt provide official FAIRLY priced second hard drive and network card kits.

    Then Tivo wants to spray ads during fast forwarding and secretly provides data to marketing groups. Tivo said how many times the nipple was replayed the superbowl before last with stolen privacy invading data.

    I think there is no way to use TV without Tivo, but Tivo has pissed me off and I cant wait until Freevo and others destroy you.

    And the icing on the cake - you cant even get the data you recorded off the Tivo.

    Dont bitch when you are in the unemployment line, you did it to yourself.

    And get that stupid whiney ugly bitch off my Tivo that keeps begging me to get relatives to buy a Tivo. I hate that woman. Who the hell is she? Everyone with a Tivo knows her, the Whiney big nosed brown haired bitch. Here is a tip: cut the crap with the $300 buyout. It used to be a hell of a lot cheaper. And here is another tip: EVERYONE hates another monthly, so make the buyout cheaper.

    - Tsarkon likes the Tivo a lot, but thinks the company is foolish and is pising off its own fans.

  51. DirecTivo by sho222 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe the best bet for Tivo's survival is to get acquired by DirecTV. The Tivo/DirecTV (or "DirecTivo") integration is excellent. I can't even remember how I watched tv at all before I had my DirecTivo box.

    Anyone who has tried Comcast's alternative to Tivo knows that the interface is completely horrible. It actually makes me angry just to think about it.

    When I move this summer, I'm planning on continuing with DirecTV service rather than switching to cable strictly because of the tight integration with Tivo. The Tivo partnership is already a huge asset to DirecTV, they might as well add Tivo to their balance sheet and make it official.

    Tivo is my favorite robot friend (next is Roomba). Tivo has made TV fun and interesting again. I discovered Battlestar Galactica thanks to Tivo. I think I'd cry if Tivo died... seriously.

    1. Re:DirecTivo by elsegundo · · Score: 1

      Absolutely.

      DirecTivo kicks ass. The interface is very easy to use. I can record anything, even pay-per-view if I have paid for it. The only problem I've ever had is recording Cold Case on CBS after a football game has gone past 7:00. But expanding the recording window is easy.

      Two things that would make it even better is:
      1. Instead of doing the daily calls over the telephone every night, do it over my internet connection instead.

      2. Let me access the box via a network connection, so I could set up some sort of server on my network to be able to program it remotely (like from the other side of the country) to record programs I forgot to set up recording for.

      --


      The revolution will be televised. Blackout restrictions apply.
    2. Re:DirecTivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can already get your tivo to do this with a turbonet card.

      I've been doing 1 and 2 for about 2 years now.

      http://www.9thtee.com/turbonet.htm

    3. Re:DirecTivo by elsegundo · · Score: 1

      sweet.

      Thanks AC!

      --


      The revolution will be televised. Blackout restrictions apply.
    4. Re:DirecTivo by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. DirecTV has made it clear that they want all the dollars, so they're going to roll their own. It's a shame, really, as the concept for the MPEG4 boxes is very interesting - one server (4 tuners, 250-400GB) connected to remote set top boxes. Pick your remote box as SD or HD (per your set). All the content is shared on the main box. With TiVo, I had hopes of a really nice interface, with DTV calling all th shots, it's probably not going to be pretty.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:DirecTivo by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, but DirecTV apparently doesn't. They've already announced that they're dropping Tivo.

    6. Re:DirecTivo by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I switched to DirecTV because of DTivo. I had a regular Tivo, but I was always having two shows on at the same time. With DTivo, I can record both of them.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  52. Who the f*ck cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyway?

    Once it's done and dusted it'll be just another
    dead "technology" that's better left in history books. YAY - for media hype.

  53. Fixing TiVo? by unfortunateson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really, really like my 1st-gen Tivo. Streaming the whole world's content is probably not in their cards, because of the enormous legal costs to get that started (and defended).

    A good first step would be a CableCard-enabled TiVo, so that it can sit directly on those DRM-laden digital cable nets. But there has to be a significant [b]perceived[/b] improvement over the existing cableco-owned PVR. Multiple tuners, better UI, HD... but it's going to be awfully hard to generate revenue when the cableco's give their boxes away.

    Too bad there's no CableCard equivalent for DirecTV, VOOM, and EchoStar.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Fixing TiVo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad there's no CableCard equivalent for DirecTV, VOOM, and EchoStar.

      Sure there is. The off-the-shelf TiVo box works with a DirecTV unit - you can use the included serial cable to hook it in directly to your receiver so that you don't need to worry about the whole IR transmitter thing. If you're worried about PPV content, pay for it in advance and then schedule the recording. It's not that hard.

      Dish Network is DirecTV for the less-refined, really. The advertising is worse, the equipment is generally not as good, and they tend to market it to people who think DirecTV is a "luxury" item. Those people probably wouldn't be getting a TiVo anyway without getting it built-in with a Dish receiver.

      As for VOOM, it's dead in the water anyway - they're shutting down operations, so who cares.

    2. Re:Fixing TiVo? by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

      You misunderstood: CableCard is a common receiver spec with a service-issued card to enable access to their DRM'd content. This is a feature found in a number of digital TV monitors.

      See here: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1749012,00.as p it turns out TiVo is already planning this, and
      here:
      http://engadget.com/entry/123400030002 5456/ for an Engadget report on Cable Card.

      The Sat receivers have no such common format -- you're stuck with their receivers, and transfer to other devices is analog (except for HD)

      --
      Design for Use, not Construction!
    3. Re:Fixing TiVo? by fearofcarpet · · Score: 1

      The Sat receivers have no such common format -- you're stuck with their receivers, and transfer to other devices is analog (except for HD)

      That's not true either. While the DirecTiVo boxes won't support MomeMedia, my box (which channel changes by serial cable, hence no IR screw-ups) has the HomeMedia option which allows me to export recorded content to a PC or to another TiVo. As of it's release it's dripping with DRM and is Winblows only (maybe Mac too, but certianly not Linux ), but you can in fact burn it to DVD or copy it to another computer; you'd just need the password to play it on the 2nd computer. If you have other HomeMedia-enabled TiVos in the house they will all be able to play content off of each other real-time. The HomeMedia option sucks rocks compared to downloading other peoples' rips (it can't be illegal to download copies of shows you've already recorded... Oh wait this is America) because the copying is real-time, but I bet it kicks ass for a dialup user or neophyte that doesn't know how to download TV rips.

      --
      Actually, I wrote my thesis on life experience.
  54. Too late by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want nobody to ever mess with 30 second skip. DO NOT FUCK WITH 30 SECOND SKIP.

    I got the Charter DVR service from Charter Communications as a test, which is a Motorola BMC9012 running Digeo's MOXI software.

    When first set up, the skip button was a 30 second skip, and replay was a 7 second reverse jump.

    After the box downloaded its first software update, the skip button stopped working. It became a 15 minute skip. What the fuck purpose is a 15 minute skip?

    I called Charter to inquire about this. I asked what the purpose of the 15 minute skip button was; they responded that it was to jump quickly into a program (WTF?). I asked them why it was no longer a 30 second skip. The person I was talking to responded that it was "illegal" to have a 30 second skip.

    After I recovered myself from this egregiously wrong statement, I informed him there was no state of federal law prohibiting a 30 second skip on a PVR, and further informed him of other PVRs that do just that. He insisted there was "a law". I asked to speak to his supervisor, who again told me it was "against the law" to have a 30 second skip, and that Charter had to "obey they law". I again informed him there was no such law, and asked him to cite any such law. The conversation essentially went nowhere. I tried the next day with the same result.

    While pondering the absurdity of it all, I got a call back from a manager at Charter who had apparently become aware of my call. He apologized for the phone representatives saying that it was "illegal"...he said, essentially, that they shouldn't have said it was "illegal" or "against the law", but that Charter had "legal concerns" with its content providers and advertisers. I pointed out that Charter's corporate "legal concerns" are a lot different than something being "illegal", and that the phone agents might not want to tell people that.

    But ultimately, how many people will get DVR services like this and never know there was such a thing as a 30-second skip? They'll be tickled that they can record 40 hours of video (not knowing they could record 400 by just adding a drive, which of course is disabled on this box) and fast forward through commercials like a VCR, and that they can pay Charter an extra monthly fee to watch the recorded content on another TV in their own home (not knowing that it's technically possible to also watch it on their laptop, PDA, portable media player, or anywhere else they should be able to watch it). And the ones who do know about the 30-second skip will probably swallow Charter's "we can't do it because it's illegal" copout.

    And when July rolls around, those same people won't wonder how we're unable to do things we could do 30 years ago with the VCR when their DVR box tells them they're not allowed to record ER in HD (and that they must watch it live), and a call to Charter only elicits the blameless "Well, we have to follow what the TV networks make us do - it's not our fault..."

    The cable and satellite providers might be in the best position to provide DVR services that can tune all of the subscribed channels on their networks directly, without having to have some kind of convoluted IR Blaster setup or multiple settops, but they're also in the best position to severely restrict the featuresets and functionality of those boxes as well...

    1. Re:Too late by J-Hawker · · Score: 0

      Wow, you really busted their balls. Customers suck, but the ones that want to argue semantics are the worst. Just how much time did you waste to make sure the phone jockeys knew that it wasn't illegal? Did you get your 30 second skip back? Oh well, you got to pound your chest, though.

    2. Re:Too late by GodLived · · Score: 1

      Interesting points, all. The risk is allowing the cable companies to dictate to us what the definition of "PVR" (or DVR) is.

      Some questions for the Cable DVR advocates:
      1. How is Cable DVR going to overcome the latency problems? Read prior posts about Comcast's OnDemand issues, vis., pressing stop and waiting 3 seconds for a response.

      2. How is Cable DVR going to improve availability over a user-owned TiVo? More than HALF the time, when I flip to OnDemand, I see the message "Initializing the File Loader" (WTF does that mean, anyway?) for a full 30-45 seconds. 1/8 of the time, I get "Error Initializing the File Loader." Is this going to go away any time soon? Would I expect that this type of thing WON'T happen with the DVR service?

      3. How many hours of storage is Comcast going to offer me, and for how long? As is, I can store content on my ReplayTV indefinitely. I have some shows going back 2-3 years on mine. If I canceled my subscription to ReplayTV, my content would still be there. True of Comcast DVR? Hardly.

      The difference here, folks, is the same as with telephone answering machines versus telco-run voice mail, but with all of the problems and few of the benefits. You might get more viewability options and "survivability" (e.g., local house power failure won't take down Comcast's DVR) but there will be limits on box size and length of message storage.

      I bought a ReplayTV in late 2000 (Panasonic Showstopper 1000), paid for the lifetime subscription, upgraded the HD to 120 Gb (largest it will go), cleaned the remote 4+ times, lost the IR blaster years ago (anyone care to sell me one?) and I'm still going strong.

    3. Re:Too late by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Ignorant customer service representatives are worse than argumentative customers.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    4. Re:Too late by radish · · Score: 1

      I think most people are not talking about on demand, they're talking about a PVR built into a cable STB, so it still has a hard drive, just like Tivo/ReplayTV, but simply replaces your existing STB like a DirecTivo.

      The box is made by scientific atlanta, at least, that's what most of the cable companies I've dealt with are offering.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:Too late by FreeTheFurniture! · · Score: 1
      Wait a sec, I think you are mixing things up, Cable DVR != Cable OnDemand.

      Cable DVRs (hardware wise) are much like any other PVR (TiVo or home grown), they have a hard drive, and some software that runs them.

      There is no delay, and the data is stored on *your* cable box. So the hours of storage is based on the HD size, not some storage space segment on the Cable company's servers.

      So it's not a telephone answering maching verses voice mail thing. It's more of a luxury vehicle vs. a Ford Tempo kind of thing.

      Long live TiVo, ReplayTV, etc. BTW, check out www.eklecticsystems.com for an IR blaster. He's selling on eBay all the time (lots of people are). I bought one for my TiVo, works fine (says it's compatible with ReplayTV).

    6. Re:Too late by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's a suddenly-realized question for you: Why don't VCRs have a 30-sec skip feature? I've never seen one.

      For that matter, why don't VCR (and now DVD) players have 2-level sound settings? I've noticed that movies generally have ultra-loud scenes and soft scenes, like battles and conversations; it would be useful to have 2 sound levels set to accomodate these.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    7. Re:Too late by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      Why don't VCRs have a 30-sec skip feature?

      I would hope the answer would be obvious, but it's because VCRs are recording on linear analog tape, and a "30 second skip" in the context of tape would be useless. I mean, yeah, you could have a button that "fast forwards" for 30 seconds, and maybe queues up button presses, but without a way to easily see, instantly, where you are in the video (as you can on a DVR), a 30 second skip isn't really useful.

      But the modern "successor" to the VCR, e.g., TiVo, ReplayTV, Media Center - in fact, any product that is a digital video recorder - all have a skip feature, because it makes sense. It's the DVRs that are coming from cable and satellite operators, who are of course very beholden to their content providers, that are disabling the 30 second skip.

      For that matter, why don't VCR (and now DVD) players have 2-level sound settings? I've noticed that movies generally have ultra-loud scenes and soft scenes, like battles and conversations; it would be useful to have 2 sound levels set to accomodate these.

      I believe that is what the "volume" control is for... But seriously, having two volume presets (e.g., "soft" and "loud" would either be, if preset, 1.) wrong for most people, or, if it allowed you to set each of them either directly or as a ratio to the actual volume, 2.) too difficult for an ordinary person to understand or set up). I don't think that's a "problem" that needs solving.

    8. Re:Too late by birder · · Score: 1

      I had a 30 sec skip button on a vcr. Actually it did it in increments of 15. 15,30,45, maybe up to 60. 2 quick clicks and 30 secs. Just an auto fastforward but handy.

    9. Re:Too late by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

      If I were to hazard a guess it would be that most cheaper consumer grade VCRs wouldn't be able to accurately judge 30secs of tape travel consistantly due to spindle size changes throughout the tape.

      --
      Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
    10. Re:Too late by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Here's a suddenly-realized question for you: Why don't VCRs have a 30-sec skip feature? I've never seen one.

      RCA had a few, with a 'commercial skip' feature that would mark the tape where the VCR thought commercials started. Never really worked that well though. Other VCRs had this as well, but it would wear and tear the shit out of tapes and transports. OTOH, with no tape and no transport (except for random access spindles) this is a perfectly doable thing for HDD recorders.

      For that matter, why don't VCR (and now DVD) players have 2-level sound settings?

      My receiver has this, they call it 'midnight mode', and it reduces the dynamic range of any input. It muddies things a bit, but when I had to worry about neighbors using it and killing the sub was good neighbor policy..

    11. Re:Too late by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's a "problem" that needs solving.

      With the frequency that I see people making volume adjustments for the reasons I specified -- often frantically grabbing the remote to turn off a blast of sound or turn up whispering scene -- it clearly IS a problem. I'm just asking why the manufacturers have ignored this problem.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    12. Re:Too late by I_R_Che · · Score: 1

      My LG VCR has a 30-sec skip feature.

    13. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony SLVN750.

      Commercial Skip - A portion of playback can be skipped (like a commercial) and playback can be resumed. Press the Commercial Skip up to four times. The VCR will skip 30 seconds for each press of the button, and then restart playback.

      This is a Sony Canada site, but the last two Sony VCRs I bought in the US both had this feature.

    14. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you telling me that it would do be based on spindle rotations and not amount of tape that passed by head?

      It's not a real question, don't answer it.

    15. Re:Too late by J-Hawker · · Score: 1

      You are so wrong. Argumentive customers seek conflict in order to be belligerent. They are pond scum.

  55. Apple's Tivo Videocasting Service or iTunes+Video by metoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Take a page from Apple.

    Build a content sales and distribution network to feed you hardware business.

    Apple uses iTunes to promote iPods. Tivo should build an internet version of a cable specialty channel, and distribute content. Bittorrent does it now, Tivo can do it for the Tivoted.

    Apple are you listening? A repackaged Mac Mini (Mac PVR) with TV tuner, more storage, a dedicated remote control and a bittorrent flavoured version of iTunes. And while you are at it buy Tivo. And remember, do it with STYLE

  56. You mean just like ReaplyTV? by skintigh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "What if the company went private and became the anti-cable, letting us download, store, organize, and serve media from both cable and -- this is the important part -- the internet."

    And they could include networking hardware for free, and networking software for free, and share TV over the Internet, and share it to the PC using free open source software, and then they could change their name to ReplayTV since they have been doing all of that for years?

    Yes, sharing and auto-commercial-skipping is disabled in the new ones, but who buys the new ones.

    But seriously, if Tivo copied everything my Replay does (and maybe call it "innovating" like they did with Tivo To Go) and let me **store** and play my MP3s from the Tivo, I would covert in a heartbeat. I have yet to see a stereo component that lets me store my MP3s - I either have to use my portable, or spend $300 for a fancy LCD that needs my computer running 24/7.

  57. TiVo is dying.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... question is, has NetCraft confirmed it?

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. TiVo still much better by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

    1 have an original series Sony SVR2000, and 1 still prefer it to my Dual-tuner HD cable box. Sure, HD is heads and shoulders better than SD, but the cable box (Motorola) is so incredibly sucky as to be nearly worthless as a DVR. Basically, it misses about 20% of all recordings, either because the box locked up (my TiVo has locked up once in 4 years) or the time changed, or the HD signal got screwed up. I have to keep TiVo around just so I don't miss shows. TiVo has a huge opportunity to pounce here, but it all hinges on the support of CableCards. If TiVo came out with a reasonably priced CableCard/HD box, I would buy it tomorrow. (and would have no trouble talking my wife into buying it, which is really saying something.)

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  60. Actually, Tivo can come back with HDTV by DaFrogBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the greatest things about HDTV is that it is sent over the air. Why pay for a cable service at all if you can get the shows you want via antenna and get the highest quality available. Not to mention, you can search shows and get a guide of what's on through your Tivo.

    I think *because* of HDTV that Tivo will come back.

    Cable/Satelite $65 per month with DVR functionality

    Over the Air HDTV $14 per month with Tivo service

    I'll save the extra $50 a day gladly.

  61. HME is the answer by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    IMHO, the release of the SDK and TivoHME (http://tivohme.sourceforge.net/) is their best chance to attract new business.

  62. Lack of hardware innovation the problem by swb · · Score: 1

    Why is my SA Series 2, bought in 2002, no more technically capable than a new SA Tivo right now?

    To me this is the killer -- where's digital audio? CableCard? Expandable storage via firewire? Digital RF remotes?

    Sure, all those things have baggage and problems, but they all get me spending on Tivo (and moving the other boxes to other rooms). HMO and 2Go just make me tired.

    1. Re:Lack of hardware innovation the problem by fruity_pebbles · · Score: 1

      Amen. My brand new Series 2 seems like a clever piece of hardware for 4 or 5 years ago. For brand new hardware it seems underpowered and bland.

    2. Re:Lack of hardware innovation the problem by swb · · Score: 1

      v7.x ("Tivo2Go") level software makes it even worse. LiveTv->Now Playing is like a 3-5 second operation, and all menus are noticably slower than they used to be.

  63. Limitations are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current Tivo is limited to the cable tv and similar stuff, i.e. you need to subscribe to some company to be able to use Tivo. If Tivo can be used with a regular TV, support multiple formats, allows transfer of the "open format" saved media files, then I will buy several for me and my parents.

    As long as they stick with unpopular formats, they are doomed.

    1. Re:Limitations are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use TiVo with rabbit ears, but when you've got so few channels there's hardly a point-- a VCR and copy of the TV Guide would serve you nearly as well.

      If you get an old Series 1 TiVo and upgrade it like I have with Ethernet and some other goodies, you can suck the recorded shows out onto your computer, edit out the commercials and burn to DVD. Or, just keep the MPEG2 video files on your computer to build up a show library there.

  64. Bankruptcy by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... until TiVo either declares bankruptcy, gets acquired, or (hopefully) reports a profitable quarter.
    I wish people would stop using "bankruptcy" to mean "going out of business". Bankruptcy is just a device for postpoining or cancelling your debts. Companies use it to stay in business.
  65. This probably won't help, but... by solarrhino · · Score: 1

    Do you know what I would like? A portable Tivo. Something you could carry in your luggage (smaller and lighter is best), and connect to your motel TV. It wouldn't even have to store a lot of video or anything - just provide recent guide data and let me pause and rewind video. I've been traveling a lot lately, and screw my house and neighborhood, the only thing I really miss is my Tivo. If it could take advantage of WiFi when it's available, that'd be great - I'd expect full functionality. But if not (or in case the motel doesn't offer WiFi) it ought to turn it on at home and at least download an up-to-date database of the cable systems across the country . That way, whenever and whereever I hook it up on the road, I just tell it identify my location, and it can correctly identify the channels. Not having the channel data on the screen when I travel really bothers me. If I could also pre-download an up-to-date program guide that, at least for the cable channels, works everywhere in the country, that'd be great. If it contains national broadcast schedules, even better. If it contained local schedules for the whole country, though... wow. I'm not saying that such a unit would save Tivo. On the other hand, look at iPod sales....

    --
    "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
  66. YOU ARE ALL MORONS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not every single last one of you, just all the fools who have posted bitching about the TiVo monthly fee.

    TO THIS DAY, TiVo offers a lifetime subscription option, where you pay them a chunk of money once and that's it. When I got it, it worked out to about 24 months at their monthly rate.

    I've had my TiVo three years now, so I effectively haven't paid for my service for the last year, and as long as my TiVo doesn't need to be replaced, my service will continue to be free.

    Why can't you get that through your THICK FUCKING SKULLS????? If you don't like paying monthly indefinitely, you HAVE THE OPTION to pay ONCE. You have ALWAYS had that option, it is not new!!!

  67. You're right and you're wrong by donutello · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're right in that On Demand pretty much sucks. There are hardly any programs that you would actually want to watch - unless if you have HBO, I guess. Also, the VCR-style buttons are very laggy and very annoying to use.

    You're wrong in that On Demand is Comcast's answer to TiVO. DVR is Comcast's answer to TiVo. They don't advertise it yet, but if you call Comcast, they will have a DVR box installed in your home soon. For $9.99 a month you get a dual-tuner HD box with a 120GB HD. I've had it for about 2 months now and apart from the non-intuitive remote and the fact that Comcast won't implement or allow the 30-second skip, I haven't found a single thing to complain about with the box. You don't need to buy any expensive equipment and the subscription cost is loser than TiVo for what is a more capable box. That is what will kill TiVo.

    Did I mention, it's HIGH Definition? I don't even have an HDTV but the HD signals are so much better than the analog signals that I find myself not wanting to watch any shows on analog anymore.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:You're right and you're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The following instructions will re-program the "HD Zoom" button on the remote control to function as a "30 second fast forward" button. Works perfect for skipping through commercials. It will function when playing programs recorded on the DVR & also when playing a buffered program.

      1) Press the "Cable" button at the top of the remote to put it into Cable Box control mode.

      2) Press and hold the "Setup" button until the "Cable" button blinks twice.

      3) Type in the code 994. The "Cable" button will blink twice.

      4) Press (do not hold) the "Setup" button.

      5) Type in the code 00173 (for 30 second Skip).

      6) Press the "HD Zoom" button to map the skip or swap function to it.

      7) You're done.

    2. Re:You're right and you're wrong by donutello · · Score: 1

      This doesn't work on the MS DVR boxes that are currently being tried out in Washington. The MSTV infrastructure supports skip, but Comcast made them take out the functionality from the software. It's only a matter of time before Comcast gets the iGuide software to do the same.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  68. Over half are directv, and directv ditched tivo. by raygundan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hard to say. The "oh crap, they're dying" most likely comes from the fact that the majority of their subscribers are through DirecTV, and that DirecTV has chosen both not to renew their contract with Tivo and to pursue their own DVRs.

    They're probably still raking in customers, but the majority of them are still DirecTV folks. And those will start to disappear as DirecTV drops support and people start upgrading in a few years. I believe the contract is through 2007. With DirecTV's impending move to MPEG4, the existing tivo units won't even work once the transition is complete. The HD-Tivo owners will get screwed first, as HD locals will be the first to move to mpeg4, followed by non-local HD, and finally by all the SD channels.

    I'm hoping tivo succeeds, though-- I've really liked the two tivos I've had, despite the sluggishness of the directv models. I'm hoping that the upcoming dual-tuner cablecard unit (buy it and use it on any cable system) will finally do what i want. Dual tuner, fully digital recording, all the SA tivo features, and the ability to move from network to network.

  69. Here's why TiVo won't live on by zutroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    TiVo doesn't have direct access to the broadband cable stream. It has to rely on stupid little dongles like IR transmitters to communicate with the cable box and change the channel.

    This means that dual-tuner TiVos won't work unless you have two cable boxes, too.

    And then there's the HD problem: TiVos other than DirecTiVos can't record it. This is a big deal for those of us who have switched over to HDTV. I like being able to time-shift a prettier picture.

    I have the Motorola HDTV dual-tuner DVR at home, on Comcast cable. It may not do exactly what a TiVo does, but it's very close. I can set it up to record every time a new episode of a show comes on. I can make it record 2 TV shows, in HD, simultaneously. I can get on-demand programming. And you can even hack the remote (and I use "hack" loosely here) to give you back your precious 30-second skip.

    It doesn't make show recommendations for me, but honestly, I don't care. It does everything else, and it does it well. My parents have TiVo, and they can't record one show while watching another, nor can they time-shift HDTV content.

    TiVo has to fix these shortcomings somehow. It may be that the only way is to partner with the cable companies to get access to the cable box hardware.

    1. Re:Here's why TiVo won't live on by powerlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure why your parents can't watch one recorded program while they are recording another, but ...

      http://www.tivo.com/5.3.1.1.asp?article=234

      1/6/2005

      TiVo Developing High-Definition, Digital Cable Ready DVR

      TiVo® DVR with CableCARD Will Offer Flexible, Fully Featured Platform for Accessing HD Broadcast and Broadband Content

      January 6, 2005 - CONSUMER ELECTRONICS SHOW, Las Vegas, NV - TiVo (NASDAQ: TIVO) today will demonstrate a high definition, digital cable ready DVR that will enable TiVo subscribers to access the growing number of high definition broadcasts available over the air or through their cable provider without a separate set-top box. The DVR will support CableCARD technology, enabling consumers to access their favorite premium and HD cable channels with the ease of use and powerful search capabilities of the TiVo® service. Moreover, as part of the "Tahiti" strategy announced at CES today, the new DVR will also allow consumers to access, download, and manage broadband content.

      "We believe that the deployment of CableCARD technology is an essential development for the future of digital television. By eliminating the need for a separate set top box, consumers will enjoy more choice and flexibility over their entertainment delivery," said Mike Ramsay, chairman and chief executive officer, TiVo. "TiVo will play a key role in driving this technology forward to bring it to the masses."

      TiVo's HD CableCARD DVR will be a premium product marketed toward consumers that want the very best in home entertainment. Consumers will be able to record their favorite entertainment from many different sources - high-definition channels, premium cable channels, and video content available via broadband.

      CableCARDs free consumers from needing a cable set top box and offer consumers choice in how they get their digital entertainment. By providing consumer choice, companies like TiVo can provide an alternative to the traditional cable set top box and offer innovative services and content that address the consumer's personal interests.

      The new HD CableCARD DVR is in development and TiVo plans to launch the product early next year.

      For more information about any of the announcements made by TiVo at the Consumer Electronics Show, please visit www.tivo.com/ces.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:Here's why TiVo won't live on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you missed it there is this great receiver made by Hughes, the HR10-250. Low and behold it has two HDTV tuners so you can record two HD programs at the same time. Been out for quite sometime. Its an excellent receiver with all the Tivo features. Downside, bugger cost $1000. Could use a Gb ethernet card for home networking.

  70. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  71. TiVo is Dying? by Trikoloko · · Score: 1

    But has Netcraft confirmed it?

    --
    My cellphone ringtone is a ring tone.
  72. I'm not a 'hater' by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    2. "I don't watch TV, why do I want a TiVo?"

    This is not a nonsense excuse, it's a real reason not to pay for television.
    I've watched television since my parents got their first set in 1964. I was watching eight hours a day in the early 1970's.
    But no more. Television is an extremely limited medium. there are only five things:
    1: Sentimental pseudo-dramas with endless close-up shots of actors overacting under heavy lights and heavy make-up.
    2: Canned laughter situation-comedies that are rarely if ever actually funny.
    3. Talking heads going on endlessly; saying nothing.
    4. The Game. Televising 'da game, man' hasn't changed much in fifty years. Turn on a TV and within a half-second you know if you have on 'the game'. It never stops; it never changes. You either like it or not.
    5. Commercials. They used to be 60 seconds, now they are all 30 or 15 seconds. Some people consider them to be a unique American art form; some people consider pissing on a electric wire to be an art form. Nearly everyone thinks commercials suck and trys to avoid them.

    That's it. That's all television is. And, it is all that it will ever be. Because of its institutional structure and technical limitations, it is all television can ever be.

    Myself, I would rather watch DVDs, ride bicycle, write code, dance, make love, or eat pizza than watch television.

    Nothing that the television industry can do could make me go back to watching television. It's not hatred or contempt. It's just that television is simply too limited for me anymore. I've seen everything that it can possibly do. I've just gone beyond it. It doesn't matter any more how cheap that it is or what format it is.
    5.

    1. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      This is not a nonsense excuse, it's a real reason not to pay for television.

      Well, I think he meant that it's a commonly sen response to Tivo, but it *IS* a silly one. Obviously someone who does not watch TV does not need a Tivo. Why even bother saying it? It's like someone who does not drive joining in a Checy versus Ford discussions and declaring they don;t need a car anyway. Well... duh.

      That's it. That's all television is. And, it is all that it will ever be. Because of its institutional structure and technical limitations, it is all television can ever be.

      OK now I'm beginning to wonder if you aren't yanking our chains here. Have you ever watched anything beyond basic broadcast?

      Myself, I would rather watch DVDs, ride bicycle, write code, dance, make love, or eat pizza than watch television.

      You know people generally laugh at statements like this, right? Television does not take the place of those activities in most lives.

    2. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you a computer?

    3. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Television does not take the place of those activities in most lives.

      In my experience that's exactly what they do. Notice the number of T.V.'s running in the livingrooms of the houses you're cycling past? Notice people honking you off the road? Notice any other cyclists?

      T.V. is a lazy, cheap form of entertainment. It's antisocial, habit forming and a waste of life.

    4. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some good stuff on cable. E.g. Food Network and some shows on HBO. Have you seen "Curb Your Enthusiasm"? No canned laughter and very funny. Or the first 2 seasons of Six Feet Under which you can find on DVD. Very good stuff.

    5. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Or the first 2 seasons of Six Feet Under which you can find on DVD.

      On the other hand, any decent series worth watching on TV is probably out on DVD now anyway. You can just pick up the entire set commercial free in excellent quality without worrying about recording it or storing it somewhere on a hard drive.

    6. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      No, it's lazy people who watch too much TV. If television didn't exist, you really think there'd be more cyclers? The lazy would find something else to do. And do the cars honking have to do with anything?

      Damn, I wish I could go cycling right now, but here in sunny So Cal it's BEEN RAINING FOR SEVEN HUNDRED CONSECUTIVE DAYS!!!! ARRRGH!

      And, I dunno... I just don't feel bad watching an episode of "24" or "Battlestar Galactica" after a long day at work. There's nothing wrong with taking a break. I'm an engineer who works on very complicated things. I can't be creative and be active 18 hours a day. I'd have burned out years ago.

      Besides, I do all my TV watching over dinner, so I'm multitasking. And Tivo helps me do that. I watch maybe 10 hours a week. I'm very selective and enjoy what I watch. And a moment enjoyed is never a moment wasted.

      And Some of the Fox News business shows have led me to make some very good stock picks, so maybe I'll be able to retire a little early. :)

      But this whole "Oh, television is utterly devoid of value" is just silliness, and I just have a pet peeve againt people declaring absolutes like that. It's not reality.

    7. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      But how will you know it's something you want to buy?

    8. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by BinxBolling · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nothing that the television industry can do could make me go back to watching television.

      I used to think the same thing; I quit television 5 years ago, when I realized I didn't get nearly enough out of it to warrant the time I spent in fron of it. My roommate had a tube, but I only ever used it for DVDs and video games. Then, less than a year ago, he got a TiVo. I watch TV again, now. Not a ton -- less than an hour on an average day. But I get a lot more pleasure out of it than when I was watching two or three hours a day.

      There are good things on television -- your list really isn't complete. It's just that it's not usually worth the effort to watch them if you have to synchronize your personal schedule with that of the broadcasters and when 25% of your viewing time is wasted on commercials. TiVo lets you sit down any time you want and get through a "hour long" show in 45 minutes, and that changes the cost/benefit analysis a lot.

    9. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by heavy+snowfall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ever heard of discovery channel or history channel? The few hours a week i watch TV, it's one of them.

    10. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      ...I'm very selective and enjoy what I watch...

      You said "in most lives"... I'd like to suggest to you that 1. the vast majority of people in North America watch T.V., and 2. the vast majority of those are not selective about what they watch, and 3. a large number of those do not enjoy what they watch.

      No, really! You're the exception.

      I would set myself up with full cable and a Tivo if I didn't live with somebody who couldn't control themselves. The thing would be on every waking hour of the day. As it is now, it's just the antenna and it's on almost every waking hour of the day anyways.

    11. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Myself, I would rather watch DVDs, ride bicycle, write code, dance, make love, or eat pizza than watch television.

      Wow - you should get a job in the circus.

    12. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      Well, we'll just have to disagree then, Dr. Evil, as much as I respect your nefarious plots. ;-)

      I think the difference here is that I don't believe a Neilsen household represents, like, 850,000 homes or whatever. I don't think anyone really knows how many people out there are watching what.

      I'll concede on one point. I have a sister and brother in law who are both post graduate educated and have complex, scientific careers. Both are very smart. Both love reality TV shows. They also like Enterprise.

      I think we may ultimately all just be trying to find patterns in the chaos.

    13. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by baalz · · Score: 1

      A TiVo is at least as useful for someone who watches only a little TV as it is for someone who watches a lot. You describe the vast majority of TV programming, but there are a few gems out there depending on your interests - from genuinly clever shows like Futurama or Family Guy to informative shows like Good Eats or plenty of stuff on the History channel. The thing is, if you're just an infrequent TV viewer there is very little chance than anything worth watching will be on when you happen to be looking to kill a little time. If you only watch a couple hours of TV a week, you watch the BEST 2 hours of TV for that week (as defined by you). You don't have to sit through comercials, or reruns, or sit down at the TV at a specific time. It removes all the crap and leaves the best of what TV has to offer.

    14. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Those qualify as Talking Head programs under the GP's schema. They just don't have as much footage of the head itself, as they do stock WWII footage.

    15. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      But no more. Television is an extremely limited medium. there are only five things:
      1: Sentimental pseudo-dramas with endless close-up shots of actors overacting under heavy lights and heavy make-up.
      2: Canned laughter situation-comedies that are rarely if ever actually funny.
      3. Talking heads going on endlessly; saying nothing.
      4. The Game. Televising 'da game, man' hasn't changed much in fifty years. Turn on a TV and within a half-second you know if you have on 'the game'. It never stops; it never changes. You either like it or not.
      5. Commercials. They used to be 60 seconds, now they are all 30 or 15 seconds. Some people consider them to be a unique American art form; some people consider pissing on a electric wire to be an art form. Nearly everyone thinks commercials suck and trys to avoid them


      6. Action/Adventure shows. Maybe you classify them under #1, but I think they're different enough to justify their own category. Some of those are worth watching.

      7. Documentaries. Also worth watching.

      The good thing about Tivo is, it can find the diamonds that are buried in the mountain of dung that is most TV.

      Myself, I would rather watch DVDs, ride bicycle, write code, dance, make love, or eat pizza than watch television


      Another good thing about Tivo is that I can watch DVDs, take walks, read, make love, and eat pizza, and STILL see my favorite shows whenever I want to.
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    16. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Besides, I do all my TV watching over dinner, so I'm multitasking.
      That is considered anti-social by some. Ever ate on the dinner table, with your wife and kids?
    17. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1: Sentimental pseudo-dramas with endless close-up shots of actors overacting under heavy lights and heavy make-up.
      I'm sure right now Shakespeare is very happy you labelling his work this way.

      I've seen everything that it can possibly do.
      I suggest finding a nice doctor and explaining your logic to him. Delusional thoughts like this are an expression of a medical condition that should be treated before you wind up in the clocktower picking off all the peons who refuse to realize they've already seen everything that can be done.

    18. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he routinely has sex that involves a computer. Maybe one day they'll combine to create the perfect offspring.

    19. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      Ever ate on the dinner table, with your wife and kids?

      OK, who wants to tell him not everyone on the planet is married?

    20. Re:I'm not a 'hater' by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      But how will you know it's something you want to buy?

      Word-of-mouth is usually pretty good. You could always rent them. Lots of video stores have television shows these days, at least around here.

  73. Re:About TiVo tsarkon reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous Coward wrote: Tivo said how many times the nipple was replayed the superbowl before last with stolen privacy invading data.

    No, Tivo did not invade your privacy. Tivo announced some time ago that it was going to provide Nielsen-like ratings information to television stations about which shows were recorded and played on its subscribers' Tivos. However, personally-identifying information about those subscribers was not disclosed. How does the general statistic of how many times that scene was replayed invade your privacy, AC? Just how many times did you replay it, anyway?

    It is actually a good thing that Tivo captures marketing information about shows that are watched. Otherwise, the television stations are going to think that no one is watching those shows that you love and record for later viewing-- Niesen only captures information about shows that are being watched at broadcast time. Remember, you the viewer are not the customer of the television stations-- the customer is the advertisers who actually pay for the shows. No audience watching ads, no advertisers to pay for shows, no TV except for public television and infomercials.

  74. Not just TiVo... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    ...all standalone DVR companies are facing similar hurdles. I have been a long-time ReplayTV user, and when Charter Cable began offering Digeo's new MOXI box, I had to jump at the chance. Yes, it is lacking a few missed features like the ability to offload shows to a PC and "keyword" recording, but the ability to have a dual tuner DVR with fully integrated Digital Cable box (which has virtually eliminated all recording conflicts) along with HD recording, and digital audio outputs for under $10.00 per month with no upfront equipment costs is simply stunning. Neither ReplayTV nor TiVo can touch it from a price/performance perspective. Yes, I am now at the mercy of how the Cable company actually configures the box (for example, I'm patiently awaiting Video On Demand to be rolled out) but the overall experience, feature set, and price point is, to me, excellent. I still have my ReplayTV boxes for offloading shows, but my main DVR is now MOXI.

    (Not affiliated with Digeo, just a satisfied customer running a MOXI Tips & Tricks site.)

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  75. Nonsense by donutello · · Score: 1

    Tivo's problems have nothing to do with the RIAA/MPAA/advertisers. Tivo's problems have everything to do with the fact that cable companies are offering a better product at a cheaper price without requiring you to buy expensive equipment that might become obsolete soon.

    Tivo was first to market with their solution but the competitors are now offering a better product (dual tuners, HD) for a lower price. Tivo is failing because it was not able to translate its market-mover advantage and brand recognition into being able to offer a consistently better or cheaper product. If Tivo was always a step ahead or cheaper than what the competitors were able to do, they'd still be successful. Unfortunately for them, their offering has stagnated while the cable companies have beaten them not only in features but also in price.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:Nonsense by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Informative

      $99 is expensive? That's what I've seen Series II boxes going for.

      The cable company product most definitely is NOT a better product. Can you fast forward through American Idol? Not on some Comcast supplied boxes. That's just a preview of what you can expect in the future as your ability to fast forward, skip commercials, retain recordings for long times, etc.. is stripped from those boxes.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    2. Re:Nonsense by donutello · · Score: 1

      $99 is expensive compared to FREE. $13/month is expensive compared to $9.99 a month.

      I don't watch American Idol so I can't tell you whether you can fast forward through it, but what I can tell you is that for FREE + $9.99/month, I get a dual-tuner HD DVR box. How much would the same cost with Tivo?

      Regardless, the point remains that what's killing Tivo is not the RIAA/MPAA/advertisers/boogeyman, but the fact that their competition is beating them in their offering.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    3. Re:Nonsense by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      Look, these guys are selling you on the "first hit is free" plan. Once Tivo is gone, watch your rights go. I don't watch American Idol either, but I did read the story where Comcast boxes wouldn't fast forward on that ONE PARTICULAR show.

      That sounds like a test run to me and like big trouble in the future.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    4. Re:Nonsense by donutello · · Score: 1

      Look, I'm not arguing that the cable DVR is a better product in the long run. All I'm saying is that Tivo is dying because the cable guys are offering a better product that costs less TODAY. Tivo needs to compete with their offering or it will die.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  76. Cable Cards and HDTV by fatlard · · Score: 1

    Well, I feel that in order for TIVO to survive depends on a few things 1. Cable Cards - This essentially can integrate the cable box with Tivo. 2. HDTV TIVO - Tivo really miss the boat on this one. 3. Dual tuners - As many tuners as possible.

  77. Sad and I'm about to jump, too. by Balthisar · · Score: 1

    I'm a thrilled TiVo owner. Absolutely. But I'm going to jump ship really, really soon now. Not because I don't love my TiVo, but because I now need more flexibility. I wish -- oh I wish -- that TiVo would release some propriety x86 binaries to the Linux crowd. This would let them keep their subscription model, but it would let me build the box I want. The box I want is what's going to replace my TiVo. It's going to a pain in the butt, cause me lots of heartache, trouble, and money, but in the end it will be so much more than the TiVo. The only thing my new box won't do that makes TiVo "extra" special is learning my preferences and recording things by itself. Well, maybe someday.

    --
    --Jim (me)
  78. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  79. not quite by hawk · · Score: 1

    Directv charges $5/month for one or more tivos. You *also* pay $5 month for them as receivers (except for your first receiver).

    Regular tivo gets something like $8/month extra for your second, third, etc. tivos.

    The $5 extra is worth it for what a tivo does. I certainly wouldn't pay $13.

    I'm looking at giving it all up for analog cable and mythtv after I move this summer.

    hawk

  80. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  81. Tivo also never capitialized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on it's name.

    I remember the 80's and the "I want my MTV" slogans that forced cable companies to carry the channel. I've been WAITING for 2 years now for a "I want my TIVO" slogan. Nada.

    Tivo is STILL ignoring features that would make it unstoppable. Wishlists are nice. Personalizing them would be better. Allowing people to share/use their wishlists would even be better.

    Shrug.

  82. Dumbass: by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

    It's NOT illegal, and it's not semantics.

    Something being "illegal" means it's against the law. It's not an issue of semantics. What they said was an outright lie; a fabrication; completely inaccurate.

    Do you honestly think that's what they should be telling people? That there's no 30-second skip because it's "against the law"?

    1. Re:Dumbass: by J-Hawker · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't give a crap what some phone jockey says. Right or wrong, it means nothing. They didn't "lie" or "fabricate". They were wrong. Big deal. You know why they got rid of the skip, and you are just being a baby because they won't say it. You just love being right. Too bad it just makes you a little bitch that still doesn't have a 30-second skip button.

    2. Re:Dumbass: by daveschroeder · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      God, you're a fucking moron.

      First of all, the phone jockeys, whether they "know" anything or not, are the primary interface to the customer. I'm not saying *they* were personally, maliciously lying. That's not the fucking point. The point was that somewhere along they line, they were TOLD what to say. Someone, somewhere, within either the telephone call center organization or management instructed the phone staff how to respond to that question. And if they're giving out completely incorrect information, and you KNOW it's incorrect, you're saying that, as a customer, you should just ignore it and/or take it? This isn't a case of the phone staff not knowing something "technical"; this is a case of a company using their main customer interface to actively spread information that is incorrect to shield blame from itself. And yes, that's what it is, whether 1000 people or ten call up about the 30 second skip, which has been an integral feature of DVRs since the birth of TiVo.

      This was merely a response to someone who said "don't ever fuck with the 30 second skip", and was pointing out that someone already had. And not only had they fucked with it, but they were, collectively as an organization, lying about why they did, i.e., that it was "illegal" to have a 30 second skip when that is clearly wrong. And no, dipshit, they weren't just "wrong". This wasn't just a "mistake". You don't accidentally specifically say that you can't have a 30 second skip because it's "illegal", and for two different phone agents and two different "supervisors" on separate days to say the same thing. And they weren't stumbling for the answer, they knew exactly what to say. In other words, WHETHER THEY THEMSELVES KNOW WHETHER IT'S ILLEGAL OR NOT IS IRRELEVANT.

      But, dumbass, I could give a shit less about Charter's 30 second skip. As I said in my original post, I was TESTING the Charter DVR unit. It is NOT my primary DVR, nor will it ever be. My job responsibilities led me to test several DVRs, one of which was Charter's BMC9012.

      Nice job with your stinging reply. Get a fucking brain before you respond next time. I can't believe I had to spell out to you why it's wrong for the customer service/support organization to actively spread incorrect information with a goal of shielding itself from a decision that IT MADE, itself, that negatively impacts the customer.

    3. Re:Dumbass: by J-Hawker · · Score: 1
      It doesn't matter. It's like you calling me "dumbass". Wow! That really stings. Mr. Professional Angry Customer called me dumbass.

      I can see you now, sitting there talking to your friends, er, no wait. That doesn't make sense. You are sitting there talking to the other losers at the bar about how you were so right. I mean, they were so wrong, but you called them on it.

      Yeah, they just loathe you. Fucking dork. What's your next trick? Those jerks at Best Buy lying to you about their warranties? Go get 'em, Mr. Professional Angry Customer! They are just asking for it!

    4. Re:Dumbass: by bani · · Score: 1

      you're defending liars.

      what's next, defending kenneth lay because "boo hoo, thats just what corporations and executives are expected to do"?

    5. Re:Dumbass: by J-Hawker · · Score: 1

      Not so hot in reading comprehension, eh?

  83. Just in time. by MisterMoney · · Score: 1

    Just when I finally got TiVo because it was included in the DirecTV package I just signed up for...

  84. I have TiVo by Secrity · · Score: 1

    I used one of those cable box / DVRs at a friend's house and it made me very glad that I have TiVo.

    1. Re:I have TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never said they worked well (or at all even), just said they're going to be releasing them to the public...

  85. I thought Tivo died . . . by indytx · · Score: 1

    When Buck Rogers was cancelled.

    --
    Make love, not reality television.
  86. tivo hardware costs by hawk · · Score: 2, Informative

    The regular tivos are certainly expensive. THe directivo, however, can be had for $99 installed. Or, if you already have directv, you can still get it for $99. Sometimes $49. Even free sometimes if you already have directv, possibly with a tivo, and ask for it.

    Then add the $5/month for tivo service through directv.

    hawk

    1. Re:tivo hardware costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say regular TiVos are expensive but you can get a DirecTiVo for $99??
      Amazon has been selling standalone TiVos for $89 after rebate for a few months.

  87. Tivo Not in Danger by mtaco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DVRs are obviously here to stay no matter what happens. People who own TiVos are addicted to them and the satellite and cable guys are moving to emulate them, not supplant them. So far, most of their offerings are lame from what I've seen so TiVO clearly has an opportunity.

    Granted, stand-alone DVRs may not survive. Instead, your DVR will probably be integrated into your paid-TV pipe as more and more of those pipes go digital. I have a DirecTiVo and it rocks. If it stopped working, I'd drop my whole satellite subscription entirely and stop watching regular TV entirely. It wouldn't be much of a sacrifice as before my DirectTiVo, I didn't have regular TV, I just watched DVDs. I only got regular TV after 9/11, and since then I've found that the regular news coverage is so bad that you're better informed if you DON'T watch TV. Bottom line for me is that TV is only worth watching with a DVR.

    So I see that TiVO could easily survive simply by being the standard "operating system" for set-top boxes and satellite recievers. The subscription fee can then be rolled into the fee for the monthly service, or subsidized like mine is. (DirectTV only charges $5/month for the TiVO part). Assuming its even necessary as my DirectTiVO gets all its program information from the satellite anyways.

    However, at 3 million subscribers, that's easily enough to keep the company afloat no matter what happens.

    So TiVO as separate box you buy at Circuit City? Probably not going to last. TiVo as a "feature" of your cable/satellite box? Inevitable.

  88. TiVo as content aggregator? by ralphclark · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    TiVo can't sell content unless they have distribution rights. But that won't happen unless the media corporations divest themselves of their distribution businesses. AFAIK no government of any major developed country has so far had the balls even to ask the media corps to play fair in the marketplace, so I can't see this sort of unbundling happening soon.

    1. Re:TiVo as content aggregator? by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      flamebait? huh???

      What, does the CEO of BskyB get mod points?

  89. Get over yourself, you silly fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You're the miserable subhuman who posted that horrible, hateful post to the solider in Iraq.

    The only thing you've moved beyond, mate, is sanity. Wow! You've move beyond television! You must be ready for Godhood, now, right? I'll alert the media! Hey, media! We have a self-righteous wonderboy here who has moved beyond television! Shall we just make him King Of The World now or do we need a referendum?

    Get over yourself, kid. I know you think you've got it all figured out, but your posts reveal a pattern of extreme ignorance. You really are a sad sack of egotistical nothing.

    1. Re:Get over yourself, you silly fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're the miserable subhuman who posted that horrible, hateful post to the solider in Iraq.
      Soldiers kill people or facilitate the deaths of people for money. They make careers out of it. And the parent poster is subhuman for pointing that out?
  90. Re:Apple's Tivo Videocasting Service or iTunes+Vid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no problem seeing this happen in the not to distant future, but only after the mass adoption of multicasting on the public Internet. The BBC opened the doors in the UK. Other content providers are pushing ISPs to deploy multicast in other places too.

    Once Multicast is available to most people, the content will be there. If you build it, they will come.

  91. Maybe Tivo should get Salesmen... by raam · · Score: 1

    If there is anything that would be well-received by a great many people, it would be a Tivo. Everyone has (and can operate) a vacuum. Everyone also has and can (for the most part) operate a TV.

    Can the same be said for a Tivo?

  92. Dreamix by Sg4 · · Score: 1

    Tivo should look at Dreamix. Www.dreamix.tv

  93. Tivo HD prices will be their death by drmemnoch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was a long time Tivo subscriber. Then I bought an HDTV.

    I knew that I would need to upgrade my Tivo to support HD. I was hit by sticker shock!!! $1000 smackeroonies for the Directv-Tivo unit that supports HD. I explored other options. Low and behold, Dish Network had a similiar unit which i could rent for $5 a month.

    I will spare you the details since you can do math. But my thought process was this, the useful life on something like this is 3 years before new tech is needed.

    $1000 over three years versus $5 a month over three years. That's an $800 dollar difference. You can guess what this Tivo subscriber did.

    --
    Those who can do... Those who can't get a certification from Cisco or Microsoft.
  94. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  95. Question the poster of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every week there's something here on the death of Tivo - keep posting about it and 'maybe' it will happen?- is that it?

    Anyways, Tivo has changed the way i watch TV. I pick what I want to watch and thats it. Its extremely frustrating to go back to watching live TV - take NASCAR yesterday, ads every 4 minutes, Jesus - now there is time that I can use to do something else instead of watching another erection ad or car ad or whatever other crap they want to sell you.

    Tivo or the concept of Tivo will be around for awhile me thinks.

  96. Tivo cannot compete with Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Tivo became anti-cable and allowed downloading, etc., they would be quickly squashed with lawsuits. It's the American Way... as is well-funding companies that dominate market share. Tivo probably realized in the beginning that their domniance in this market would be short-lived, it was only a matter of time. At the very least, we can he thankful that Tivo started this revolution of PVR in the home, and inspired projects like MythTV, Freevo, et al.

  97. Replay TV better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Replay TV seems better, its what I have. It has built in networking, and there are already open source programs out there to download recorded shows to your workstation, and do whatever you want with them. No hack required.

  98. Except that they do exactly that by hawk · · Score: 1

    Look at the directivos . . . $5/month for tivo, and you get it for $99 . . .

    hawk

  99. The bell that rings every 6 months? by bi_boy · · Score: 1

    Is it me or do these "TiVo death watch" things come up every 6 months or so for some reason or another? I know people who work at TiVo, and the last time I asked them about the whole "TiVo is dying" thing that showed up a couple of months ago they told me they come up now and again usually because people who write those articles are obviously oblivious to new and strange things that are happening on the inside without their knowledge. Granted I don't work for TiVo myself, nor do I even own one or watch tv but when these things run like a bi-annual bell I think its kind of silly.

    --
    Chicken fried butter sticks? Do ... do you use a fork? - Black Mage, 8-Bit Theater
  100. Where is the Loss? Help me understand? by lordmage · · Score: 1

    I have direct TV and I have a TiVO in it. It provides 2 inputs and is very good.

    The reason standalone TiVOs wont work is due to the multiple feed of a specific type. In order to get HD you have to have HD recievers.. etc.

    The dual input is rocking.. I want a QUAD INPUT!!!!

    and why is Direct TV not wanting to renew a profitable deal with TiVO? Sounds like TiVO is shooting themselves there.

    --
    I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
  101. Number 3 by ad0gg · · Score: 1
    3) Tivo is spyware and deserves to to disappear. Not only do they collect you what stations you watch but your click stream of your remote so they know what your replaying and doing slowmo.

    For you fan boys that say you can opt out, if tivo cared about our privacy they'd make it opt in. And wouldn't bury that they are spying on you, deep in their terms of service.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  102. TIVO is just a small fish in a big pond... by sxmjmae · · Score: 1


    I have computer running Window Media Center 2005.
    I have programmed in all the show I like and indicated to record only new showings etc. I can leave town for a week or a month and know the shows I care about are recorded. Combined with the media range extender I can watch the play back on my 57 inch TV downstairs.

    What did I pay for this... a fair amount (at least twice the price of a TIVO - which is illegal in Canada). But considering it is also a computer (despite running windows), and I have no subscription fee to pay to get the TV schedule, and I can burn shows off to DVD, and I can upgrade my hard ware any time.

    My ultimate choice would be a stand alone device. That would have:
    - Standard outputs
    - Able to load the schedule via the internet
    (via wired-Ethernet or wireless-Ethernet - 801.2 b/g)
    - Provide a nice interface
    - A very large hard drive with the ability to replace/upgrade later on.
    - A DVD/CD burner to record directly to DVDs or to burn/achieve recorded shows.
    - A built in battery (in case the power fails it could safely shut down or finish recording the program).
    - No maitaince fee for the TV scheule or a one time fee for the product (one time subscription fee included in the base price).
    - Able to have limited internet access (play internet radio, load firmware upgrades).
    - A big bonus would be able to wirelessly access and transmit content from the device to other locations in the house (most like via remote access points).
    - Another big bonus would be able to record two programs at once.
    - Allow cable passthough
    - Allow picture in picture (or side by side pictures. I love being able to watch two football games at the same time on one TV).
    - Typical VCR controls when watching LIVE TV.
    - A nice sleek looking box.

    For a product like that all nicely intergrated into one sleek looking box with a remote I would definetly pay for.

    It seems to me that it will get there. All of it is possible with off the shelf part right now but to full integrate it into one sleep box always takes time. The Company's will produce half ass stuff for years and make slight upgrades to continue to selling their junk. Or they will offer something so far above what a typical person needs and charge an arm and a leg for it (but when it fails to sell they say their is no market and refuse to sell a cheaper model that did not offer the useless costly features).

    It will take a company like TIVO to really listen to what customers want. Bigger companies all ways seem to like tell the customers what they need/like.

    Maybe TIVO needs change their business model so they just sell the hardware to the Cable Companies and maintina the TV scheduling aspect.

    Ah... Maybe someday a company will achieve what I can do with desk top computer and some software/hardware.

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
  103. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  104. TiVo can't be saved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    St. Thomas Aquinas had a dickens of a time proving the existence of the human soul. I think he'd have an even harder time proving that TiVo had one.

  105. Re:More efficiently? Bah. by Bastian · · Score: 1

    As a TiVo user and someone who has seen Cable DVR, here's what I can tell you:

    Compared to TiVo, Cable-provided DVR just plain sucks. The interfaces are generally nightmarish, and they are lacking featuers that TiVo has. The difference is so great that I dropped digital cable shortly after getting a TiVo. I mainly had digital cable for the channel guide, but the channel guide on TiVo is so vastly superior to the one that comes with digital cable in every way, that I fail to get any real value for my money with digital cable anymore.

    Given that the cable company provided ones had plenty of time to sit back, take a look at TiVo, and consider what they would improve and what they wonldn't, and that they quite obviously didn't do this, I think it is quite obvious that Comcast et al have no interest in providing a superior product. They simply plan on letting vendor lock-in win the day in this market.

    I think that TiVo is a better buy than people realize, too. Going back to digital cable, it cost me about 13 bucks a month to get digital cable. Digital cable is a product that provides you with a channel guide, video on demand, and a solution to the "nothing's on" problem in the form of a huge mess of channels with lower quality programming.

    TiVo gives you a channel guide, a sort of video on demand in the form of playing back stuff you've recorded, and a solution to the "nothing's on" problem in the form of being able to record stuff on the channels you already have at times when you can't normally watch TV.

    In that respect, digital cable brought me about 60 or 70 per cent more content, while TiVo more than quadrupled the amount of content that is available to me. For the same price. With overall higher quality additional content, too.

  106. who the fuck cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, why use a locked device with DRM. I rather use a hard disk recorder in MPEG-2 that i stored easily and transferrable without a subscription. I pay for directv so why do i need to pay tivo, i think the technology is great but a subscription is just stupid, you wouldnt pay to use a VCR each month would you? So why for a hard drive.

  107. You can't beat integration. by macserv · · Score: 1

    The problem I've always had with Tivo is that, with the way I prefer to connect my A/V components, Tivo can not record anything but Basic Cable. It cannot view, nor record, digital cable programming.

    So, when Time Warner rolled out the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8000 (and now, 8300) DVR boxes, complete with dual tuners, I knew that I'd found the device for me. One device can record two digital programs simultaneously, while watching a third. No IR transmitters, no headaches of any kind.

    Now, I'll be the last to sugest that the Explorer 8000's interface is better than Tivo. Quite the opposite in fact. But the integration of the DVR and Cable Box outweighs the negatives. Also, the Passport (the Explorer's UI) interface is getting much faster and more intuitive.

    In addition, TWC is currently rolling out the Explorer 8300, which can allow multi-room viewing. You only need one Explorer 8300 DVR box, and then you can watch programs recorded on the 8300 from any Explorer 2000 (or better) terminal in the home. No ethernet, no wireless, just the same ol' coax that's already installed.

    Integration wins. Even with CableCard and other such innovations empowering newer TVs and DVRs, Tivo will have a VERY hard time holding up to the infrastructure of a large cable company, especially Time Warner.

  108. Re:Star Trek Enterprise, Arrested Development, etc by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
    Now this is something I'd pay a subscription for. $10/month for the privelege + $1/hour prerecorded + $15 for a "season pass," with all new shows made available weekly (so subscribers get to see them early, a selling point), and live broadcasts available for $5/hour, and a "Channel Pass" for $10/month, where every show for that channel is available at any time.

    And the best part? The live broadcasts would be of any channel in any part of the country. Moved away from your home town? Find the station's call letters and watch the local news live via video stream, or download it, or get a season pass.

    Man, it would be as revolutionary as VoIP. TVoIP. Heh. Maybe they should think about a desktop package, too, like Vonage's SoftPhone. SoftTiVo.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  109. Concurment by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    I have a Tivo by Toshiba, (with dvd player) I'm still on basic service (never paid the 300 or the 13$ a month) and I've disconnected it from the network- for more than months at a time..

    After the initial setup of the box, a persistent connection to the net/phone is not necassary

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Concurment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect this is due to Tivo purchasing a block of late-night time on Discovery Channel. If Tivo closes it's doors, this last avenue of channel updates will go away.

      I suspect that if Tivo goes away completely there would be some kind of proxy you could run on your internal network so the Tivo would connect to it instead of the old servers, and your proxy would get updates from wherever MythTV, etc. get their updates and reparse it all nice-nice so Tivo's happy.

      I suspect though that if enough Tivo owners do this that the "free" services they depend on would block traffic or redesign regularly to break scripts.Tight now the amount of traffic is neglible, and it could easily spike. But worst case this would require people to (gasp) pay someone for the service they provide. I suspect a lot of MythTV boxes would be "converted" to other purposes before the purse strings were opened for anything other than hardware...

  110. TIVO sucks, do it yourself with a multi-media PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, an off-the-shelf DVD recorder with built-in hard drive like I did. I can do everything (that matters) that a TIVO can do, with no membership/monthly fees, and I can archive stuff I want to keep on DVD-05 discs. The recorder's "EP" record mode still looks 10 times better than VHS, and that lets you put 6 hours on a single sided, single layer disc where the quality never degrades over time. Only idiots fall for the TIVO line of crap on "Pause live TV!" Who cares! I don't WANT to pause live TV. And I don't want the stupid thing going out and recording stuff on it's own based on my "viewing habits" either! I already know what I want to record and my satellite reciever has a timer function that works just like programming a VCR. Easy Peasy! My recorder has a neat function that starts recording automatically when the video input from the satellite reciever detects a signal. It's a bit of a manual process, but I will restate: "I can to everything a TIVO can do, with MY OWN equipment!"

  111. Re:About TiVo - updated this morning by crablouie · · Score: 1

    Woke up, turned on tv and there's a message from tivo informing me they've added tivo2go. That allows me to copy recorded shows from the tivo too my pc or laptop.

    --
    I think so, Brain. But where will we get a duck and a rubber hose at this time of night? --Pinky
  112. So who will survive? by truesaer · · Score: 1

    I need a new PVR. I don't want a TiVo since their death is predicted so often. Right now I have a ReplayTV...how are they doing? The frustrating thing is that the specs on the cable and DirecTV PVRs are better than TiVo and ReplayTV. I want two tuners...I want to record two shows at once. And the only boxes that allow this are tied to specific content providers.

  113. It's a good thing Tivo used Linux as their OS by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    I mean if they had went with BSD, they would be dead already!

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  114. What's the revenue model for the SDK? by dmorin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As a coder I love the fact they've released an SDK (Java, even!). I've successfully gotten apps to run on my tv. That alone is cool, and conjures up no end of daydreams about the sort of thing that could be enabled with such a home-centralized console. When I hear the Comcast commercials and think "Saving money would be nice" I immediately think "Yes, but I can write code for Tivo," I'm not giving that up. Even if I don't write any reasonable code for it I trust the open source community to come up with some good stuff.

    But that's me. I'm a geek. How are they going to make money from that, does anybody know? Is there a plan to start buying applications from the community and selling them as add on services or something? Or perhaps licensing them so that I as an author make some money based on how many people subscribe to my application? (Imagine the horror show of technical support THAT would be!)

    Surely they can't have gone through all this trouble just to keep we coders thrilled. How does this scale to the larger audience and get Tivo back in the game?

  115. already done by turbopunk · · Score: 1

    letting us download, store, organize, and serve media from both cable and -- this is the important part -- the internet.

    ummm, can you say replaytv?

  116. What's so bad about TiVo failing? by wilson_c · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So...for the sake of argument, let's say that TiVo goes bankrupt and are unable to find additional financing. What's gonna happen? They'll be bought, probably by one of the larger content distributors (Comcast, DirecTV, Charter, whoever).

    Anyone buying TiVo wants two things:
    1. The TiVo brand. Can you even name another PVR brand? Nobody says "I've got to PVR that show". TiVo is the ONLY product with any name recognition in the marketplace.

    2. The TiVo functionality. As anyone who as ever used one knows, there's no comparison to other PVRs. It's got a great interface and is remarkably stable (not perfect, but pretty close).

    To mess with either of those threatens to devalue what they've purchased.

    Sure, there might be some rough spots when the new owners cow to pressure from content providers, but ultimately the marketplace wins on these things and it will become incrasingly hard for content providers to explain why they want to sue distributors for allowing their customers to do what they've come to expect.

    1. Re:What's so bad about TiVo failing? by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      1. The TiVo brand. Can you even name another PVR brand? Nobody says "I've got to PVR that show". TiVo is the ONLY product with any name recognition in the marketplace.

      Probably true in the US. Rather less so in the UK.

      Tivo didn't really catch on over here. But Satellite network Sky probably had the first integrated PVR product. And I've definitely heard people saying "I'm going to SkyPlus that show".

      Failing that, people still refer to "taping" or "videoing" shows - even via a PVR or DVD-Rrecorder.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  117. ReplayTV? by msblack · · Score: 2, Informative
    What, no mention of ReplayTV? They beat Tivo to the market by a few days/weeks. ReplayTV handles some features better than Tivo and some worse:
    • ReplayTV doesn't store content which you don't specifically request. No Tivo commercials or content taking space you allocated to a show you wanted to record.
    • Tivo's season pass works better than ReplayTV which doesn't understand episode repeats.
    • ReplayTV has the 30 second skip missing from cable/dish PVRs
    • One ReplayTV model had the commercial skip feature.
    • Newer ReplayTV models let you share content with other ReplayTV boxes or PCs.
    I've been considering the Dish 921 PVR with two HD tuners. You can record two shows and watch stored content from a third. They recently cut their price in half to about $500. I'm told the menuing sucks and the record function works like a VCR by time and misses a show if the time changes after programming. Anyone else using the Dish 921?
    --
    signature pending slashdot approval
  118. Make sure you understand "lifetime"... by rpdillon · · Score: 1
    I am building a MythTV box. My friend (not as tech-saavy) bought Tivo, but he did his research on the Tivo "lifetime" membership, and determined it was pretty much a wash as to whether the month-to-month or "lifetime" was better. Here's a section directly from the Tivo website that pertains:

    Conditions of use
    A product lifetime subscription to the TiVo service covers the life of the TiVo Digital Video Recorder (DVR) you buy--not the life of the subscriber. The product lifetime subscription accompanies the product in case of ownership transfer. The subscription remains in effect if your DVR needs to be repaired or replaced due to a malfunction (see manufacturer warranty details). Because a product lifetime subscription is linked to a particular DVR, it cannot be transferred to any other DVR (unless the DVR is replaced due to a malfunction covered by the manufacturer's warranty). Each DVR purchased requires its own service subscription and activation.

    Of course, hardware products don't last forever and their lifespan will vary among individual products. TiVo makes no representations or warranties as to the expected lifetime of the product aside from the manufacturer's warranty.

    So you see what I mean. Don't be confused about "lifetime" membership. When my friend asked how long Tivo boxes last, the representative on the phone said "Well, about 2.5 to 3 years". If you do the math, it's pretty close to what you'd pay for the lifetime subscription.

    Oh, and linkage for those that'd like to see the actual text:
    Click on the "Product Lifetime" link

    1. Re:Make sure you understand "lifetime"... by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      My first tivo is 5 years old. I just gave it to my dad since I now have 2 DirecTivo's.

      I expect them all to last a long time.

  119. One word... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Betamax

    No, really. Better product, we-can-do-it-without-anybodies-help mentality.

    Where was the $4.95 (or $2.95 or $1.00)/ month deal when the cablecos made their DVRs? There is (nominally) a fixed amount of work TiVo has to do each month. Programming, software fixes (okay, there's some CS, too). Is it better to get 100,000,000 boxes at $1/mo or 1,000,000 boxes at $12.95/mo? Ask billG, he'll tell you.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  120. Re:About TiVo tsarkon reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Futurama and Enterprise are cancelled a lot of good Tivo did saving the world.

    I do not want ANY info leaving my Tivo, and you didnt answer ANY of the other gripes.

    You get a grade of F, failure to argue properly.

    Prepare for Freevo and an EDD form, butthead.

  121. Tivo Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a damned shame that Tivo isn't doing better than they are. I had a Tivo receiver for a long time, but after I moved, I've been using another brand's Tivo-like recorder. I can tell you from first hand experience that anything other than Tivo is trash. What I have now is a glorified VCR like scheduler. With Tivo, if I wanted a program, I could just tell Tivo to find it, anytime, anyplace and record it. I can sort of do that with my new system, but it locks it into a schedule (time/channel). With Tivo, you just had to tell it what you wanted, and it would find it. Ooops, you changed the channel or cancelled the scheduled recording? No problem, it would go find it someplace else for you. Damn right! That's what I'm talking about. You have a regular schedule, like South Park every night on Comedy Channel? What if you want to record a one off program that conflicts, Tivo would let you do that. My new system forces you to cancel your entire recording schedule for the program in order to record the one off, then you have to go back and schedule the series again. WTF is that?

    Tivo also allows you to record X number of episodes of something, so say you like to watch reruns of Twilight Zone, or something, you can tell it to find you those episodes, and keep 3, or 5, or 1, whatever. It'll gets rid of them oldest recorded one to make room for new ones as needed. With my new system, you either get everything until you turn it off, or you don't record any of them. What trash.

    I can accomplish 90% of what I want to do with my new system, but it's 3 times as much work, and it's really that last 10% that really made Tivo nice. Trust me, if you have a choice between Tivo, and some Tivo wannabe, take the Tivo, even if it's more money, which I don't know if it is.

  122. We need an alternative media distribution system. by EvilNight · · Score: 1

    I won't pretend I know very much about the dirty world of television and hollywood, and I am probably talking out of my ass here, but hear me out anyway. I might say something that gets you thinking. Particularly if you work for TiVo, please give this a once over and a few clock cycles of thought. You've probably already had these ideas, and if so, I'd love to hear why you haven't implemented them yet.

    To start with, people have become sick of television. Simply sick of it. I don't mean there are no good shows, because there are plenty (although, IMO, the signal to noise ratio only gets worse). I mean sick of it in the sense that they are tired of being locked into rigid time schedules and watching advertisements. They use time shifting, and buy DVDs (or rent netfilx) to avoid the advertising. I guaran-fing-tee you that if someone, somewhere, has the balls to provide a pay-for television-on-demand service that has no advertisements, they'll steal back a lot of the people who have left television behind, and probably a good portion of the people watching it now. That's the grand scheme, the ten year plan. How do we do this?

    The best thing about the PVRs is their time-shifting capability. Trouble is, cable companies can provide that just as easily, and without the cost inclusion of a subscription model like TiVo uses. It's not that the subscription model is a bad idea or is unfair; it's merely that people see it as an extra cost that they can easily get rid of by switching to a cable-company product bundle. Time shifting is simply not enough.

    For the subscription model to work, a further service has got to be added to the bundle. If someone can find a way to provide everything the cable companies provide (movies on demand via netflix, time shifting, scheduled recording, basically what we are used to now), as well as some new services the cable company can't match, they become viable again.

    So what can we put in a box like a TiVo that we know a corporation like Time-Warner is incapable of supplying? Freedom, of course. The paradigm that gave birth to the free software movement is a strictly human phenomenon; it has nothing to do with software fundamentally. Read Eric Raymond's collection of essays (and the excellent ones he links to) on the topic for further insight into this little known human phenomenon. It will work anywhere that copying content and distributing it can reach tolerable cost levels and maintain legality.

    First, we need to make the TiVo capable of supporting its own distribution network. This means lots of disk space (say, 500GB a box, shouldn't be unviable given today's drive technology, and it'd be nice to be able to mod it with upgrades, some will want to do that to help broadcast). It also means a backend capable of moving data across the internet between many TiVos. Bittorrent would probably be a good place to start. Ideally one should be able to connect to the network, see what's available, request it, and have it arrive within a day. There is no reason TiVo could not provide backend server support for this and set it up in a centralized manner, controlling what gets released into this alternative distribution system. As long as they retain approval for what is on the network, they can ensure that no copyrighted material enters it. This is very important.

    So, TiVo now provides you with everything the cable TV can provide, and there's now a "Search the TiVo Network" feature with a bittorrent backend and a pipe to TiVo's central servers. What do we do with this? Where do we get the media to put on it?

    There is an ocean of content out there that has no home. How many shows are rejected for every one that is accepted? How many guys in basements could pull off a Saturday Night Live sketch, or Wayne's World? One creative guy could easily duplicate Mr. Roger's Neighborhood. Take a look at the idea behind the Cable Science Network sometime. There's plenty of universities that would allow taping of their lectures, to be uploaded into an alternative

    --
    Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
  123. ANSWER TO YOUR PRAYERS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    REPLAY TV!!!

  124. Mod parent up by adturner · · Score: 1

    Very insightful and as a long time tivo user exactly how i feel. I just haven't pulled the trigger yet on dumping my tivo, but I keep thinking about it.

  125. It can be saved! by Masq666 · · Score: 0

    You can find more about this story at Bits of News

    --
    Bits of News Giving you the latest bits.
  126. Easy: Apple should buy TiVo by awb131 · · Score: 1

    As of today, TiVo's market cap is only about $325M. Apple should buy TiVo and incorporate the functionality of the TiVo into the Mac Mini. It could be a new model or a firewire add-on. I don't know about anybody else, but I'm already planning on using my Mini for games (NES/SNES/etc emulators, old DOS games with DOSBox, wireless USB controllers, etc) and watching movies. The only reason I don't use MythTV is that I don't like the kludge that's required for Myth to control my satellite receiver.

    --
    "There is no night so forlorn, no mood so bleak, that it cannot be infused with pleasure by tender meat..." - R.W. Apple
  127. Fast Followers and Disruptive Technology by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We'll see how this plays out. Either the technical superiority of TiVo will win out or the lower-cost, lower-quality options that the cable companies can offer will win out. Actually it's likely that both will win and retain some part of the market, the question is, how large a part for each respectively?

    If you haven't already it sounds like you need to read The Innovator's Dilemma by Clayton Christensen. The DVRs the cable companies put out don't have to be better to put TiVo out of business. They just have to be good enough, cheaper and easy to get. Being a technology leader is only valuable if three things are true. First, that you can stay a technology leader and protect that position. (through futher innovation, patents, etc) Second, that your technology leadership either lets you be the low cost provider OR that customers value your technology such that it lets you charge a premium for your services. Third, that you have economicly viable access to the right distribution channels. TiVo is arguably the technology leader in the DVR industry but I think it is failing on the maybe the second and definitely the third conditions.

    Let me give you an example. Most of us criticize (rightly IMO) Microsoft for a lack of innovation. But being the leader isn't always the best business strategy. Economists call Microsoft a fast follower. They don't innovate. They don't know how to. And if they tried, they'd fail. But what they do very successfully is watch the leaders in the market and then copy their innovations while leveraging their strengths in marketing, distribution. OS/2 challeged Windows NT a few years back. Result? Windows 95. It wasn't better than OS/2 technologically but it was good enough and Microsoft controled the distribution channels. (plus IBM shot themselves in the foot repeatedly) They can learn from the innovations and mistakes of the innovators and come out with a good enough product that most customers will buy. Sure, it's not a glamorous strategy but being a fast follower can be very, very effective.

    The downside of being a fast follower? You might not be able to catch the market leader if you aren't quick enough. Microsoft hasn't been able to catch Intuit with their Microsoft Money product despite years of trying. They got caught on the wrong side of an installed base. Being a successful fast follower requires lots of resources and an acute ear for what the market is telling you. But it also means that if there is a fundamental shift in the market or if you misread the market, you're screwed. Microsoft may have be screwed because Open Source could be one of those tectonic shifts ("disruptive technologies" in my Christensen's terminologies) that fundamentally alters the market place such that their own organizational structure no longer permits them to compete effectively. Whether this is actually the case remains the be seen.

    The other problem with being a fast follower is that if you are too good, you end up a monopoly with no on to copy from. As a result a successful fast follower either stagnates or has to move into other industries to grow. Microsoft is in this position right now. Their core OS and Office products are stagnant monopolies. Very profitable but unlikely to provide massive growth. So Microsoft is having to branch out into other lines of business. Dell is doing somewhat the same thing. They're so successful in selling PC's they are having to branch into printers, PDAs and other technologies to continue to grow.

  128. Think "fiber" by gosand · · Score: 1
    Have you actually used on Demand? You only get what Comcast decides to store; you don't get to choose what programs you can time-shift. and, of course, you're not "storing" anything -- you're getting whatever programs are held centrally. The "VCR-style" buttons are a joke -- there's a 4-5 second delay between your remote control button press and the response (good luck trying to stop a program at a given location!).

    Of course, usability is irrelevant - if they can push out competitors because of their market share, they win. Then when technology catches up, they will be able to leverage it.

    Think "fiber" connections. People always wonder how we could possibly use such a huge pipe, just like we used to wonder how we could POSSIBLY fill a 100MB hard drive. In general, people don't think far enough ahead. The internet isn't about just email and web-pages anymore.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  129. The customer is king by bjsyd70 · · Score: 1

    Never give customers a stupid reason not to buy. Don't get heavy on people with big decisions. Make it easy for them to say yes and give you money. TiVo should offer: * All up front (current with lifetime) * A mix of up front and subscription (current model with monthly). * All subscription (no up front cost at all) Let customers try the low up front cost, then upgrade to all up front cost in a couple of months when they are hooked. Brendan

  130. Cablecard will fix this, but how soon? by raygundan · · Score: 1

    The cablecard standard fixes this problem, allowing standardized access to digital and HD cable programming across different providers. Tivo's got a two-tuner cablecard box coming, but it's not due out for a year, and we all know that nothing ships on time, so expect it to be a year and a half.

    It's just what I want, but the big question is "will it be fast enough to save tivo from their loss of DirecTV and all the cheaper competition?"

  131. What about the phone companies? by digithead · · Score: 1

    I don't know if the all the telco's already have plans for their own DVR's (probably) when they rollout TV service on their new fiber networks. It looks like Verizon is using MS, but perhaps this is an opportunity for Tivo to secure some new subscribers/revenue. Of course, they should still be pursuing some of the other options discussed here too. As a current Tivo user, I'd hate to see them go under!

    --
    Once you lick the lollipop of mediocrity, you'll suck forever!
  132. I pay the monthly fees - gladly by sakshale · · Score: 1

    We have three TiVo units and pay the fees. I must be unusual in that I believe in paying for services that people provide me. The TiVo systems have saved me a lot of fuss and bother between different family members trying to remember to start different VCR units when someone is not able to watch their favorite show.

    The Season Pass function, coupled with the ability to shared shows between the three units, more than makes it worth the monthly fee.Heck, the Season Pass feature has a habit of discovering copies of shows being broadcast on unexpected channels -- keeping the Red Dwarf fans very happy.

    --
    For every problem there is a solution that is simple, obvious and wrong.
  133. A "Good Stuff" or "Tivo Recommends" feature by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    See that automatic record feature that Tivo has? The one where it guesses what you'd like. Improve it, make it smarter - a neural network or Bayesian filter or something. It is a killer feature that none of the competitors have, but it's not strong enough at the moment.

    Other than that, license your technology cheaply to everyone who wants it, be promiscuous. If you don't then the technically inferior and cheap systems will win.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  134. ReplayTV by brakk · · Score: 1

    I know with ReplayTV, their prices are the same for Tivo for the monthy or lifetime subs, but if you get a second unit (or 3rd... up to 5) the monthly sub is half price if you have either the monthly or lifetime on the first one.

  135. *ding* by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    Absolutely correct. The fact that it searches through hundreds of hours of *CRAP* for stuff that you are likely to find interesting and automatically record it for you is *the* killer feature of Tivo.

    It just isn't quite clever enough at it and needs to take into account the programme descriptions and channel information as well.

    I reckon a bayesian filter would do the job, the ones I use are 99%+ accurate at determining if I'm likely to want to read emails that I get.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  136. Have you seen HBO lately? by mildness · · Score: 1
    Nothing that the television industry can do could make me go back to watching television.

    I can change your mind with one word. Deadwood

    Cheers

    Reverend Billy Bob

    --
    bamph
  137. Tivo has stopped innovating. by johndierks · · Score: 1
    I love Tivo, and I have two of them.

    The biggest problem is that Tivo has pretty much stopped innovating. Over that last 2 or 3 years, very little has changed in the core abilities of the Tivo. They've added small bells and whistles like playing MP3s and pictures on your TV and streaming shows from one Tivo to another, but the box hasn't really gotten better. Basic functionality hasn't gotten better at all in the last 2+ years I have it. Not even on the new units.

  138. FTA TIVO by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    I've been toying with the idea of starting a Free To Air satellite TV channel. FTA is growing very quickly and there might be enough of a market out there to make it work.

    I've got the connections to get the content but I have no idea how to go about getting the uplink equipment and the sat channel.

    Now if a company like TIVO got behind that idea, I'm guessing they could develop a market for their product via the back door route of becoming a content provider. Sort of the opposite of what DirecTV did with their DVR's.

    I think there's a lot of potential for FTA. Think about how ESPN got started. They started with off the wall sports no one else wanted to carry. Now that ESPN is main stream they don't carry the oddball sports anymore. But FTA could.

    I don't know, seems like it's worth a shot. Any satellite wizards out there know anything about uplinking content and how to get a sat channel?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  139. Slightly offtopic/ Fix the reception method by haplo21112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The way that both cable and SAT are received into the home is so stupid to begin with anyway. If it were fixed (which would probably take government intervention to make companies do it right), TIVO's fortunes would probably be better.

    I have long believed that the providers should only have to install one box in my house in the basement where the cable enters the house. That box should decode all the channels that I have contacted for with my provider. Then those signals should be sent to all of the cable outlets in my house. They used to do something similar to this (I lived in an apartment in Marlborough, MA that did this up until 1999) with the channels effectively de-scrambled at the pole. Only the cable entered the apartment and any TV could watch any channel including the premium ones. Alas that ended in early 2000 when they sent us a letter saying would have to get boxes for continued premium service. (Might I add right after we got the box and all was well for a brief time, we also had to 4 day outage when the screwed the whole transition up, that's another story.)

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:Slightly offtopic/ Fix the reception method by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      I've always been of the same opinion. Pay once, get the channels decoded and then sent to your devices - TVs, VCRs, whatever.

      Like anything, though, the technology is there but it would break the companies' business model. Sure you still only pay for channels once, but they make a great deal (from their PoV) out of making customers pay for additional boxes for other rooms or VCRs.

      I mean come on, most TVs these days can handle many tens of channels. Surely it wouldn't be that technologically difficult to descramble and demultiplex all the channels and have them sent via RF to your TV set that way.
      It wouldn't even totally eliminate the extra-box-rental method, either. As, with current TVs anyway, for EPG data and advanced functionality you'd still need to check it from the box. And until SCART/Phono/DVI/S-Video can handle multiple channels the way an RF connection can then you'd still need additional boxes if you wanted to get the best out of several items of high-spec kit.

      Of course the companies probably prefer having you unable to trivially connect muiltiple TVs/VCRs, and also prefer making people pay extra equipment rental for the "Watch Two" or "Watch One, Record One" functionality.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  140. I need the "TIVO" PRODUCT NOT the TIVO service by voss · · Score: 1

    A TIVO would be useful to me...The tivo monthly service is of no use to me. Without the subscription I can justify spending $200 for tivo and programming my own channels. I dont need the $12 a month service!

  141. Want to fix TIVO.. by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

    ...maybe a TIVO Exec or two might see this, so here goes...

    1. Get rid of stupid restrictions.
    2. Allow me to mount the drive as a share over my home lan and access the content stored on board. Since you run on linux it should be fairly easy to allow for multiple mounting options. Then I can transfer the data files on and off at will. Or even record in the living room and play back on my computer.
    3. Make the Storage drive user upgradeable in a bay..better yet two bays...put the OS and applications on a small internal drive put the content on drives that I can swap in and out at will...in fact you could ever offer the unit with a bring your own storage package.
    4. Restore original pause, fast forward, commercial skipping functionality. Stop kowtowing to the media industry.
    5. NEVER EVER comply with the broadcast flag. I realize that you might have to in the face the law, but make the broadcast flag support easily fooled and "leak" the bypass on the net.
    6. Here is a big one. Do just software releases, and provide TV listing subscriptions same as always. provide me the software and I will build the box myself the way I want it...this is the true way for you to put yourself back in the back, Sell TIVO as a software package, that I can then adapt to my needs. I have no issue with you keeping whatever you want as binary only release, you can even code it to specific hardware (TV decode/decode cards)...just let me build my own linux box then install your recording playback software eon to it.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:Want to fix TIVO.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. Make TivoApp open source, the fast path to new features.

  142. Is TiVo worth saving? by Sprocketeer35mm · · Score: 1

    I would have bought a TiVo or a ReplayTV years ago, had they not succumbed to the urge to gouge with their enforced subscriptions. I'll spit on their graves.

  143. Maybe they should partner.... by CdaveC · · Score: 1

    I think Tivo should position themselves with the cable and sat companies. i.e. sell the boxes as add ons through the cable vendors (maybe even allowing the vendors to bill for Tivo, like RIM does fro BlackBerry devices).

    Ultimatly, the cable and sat companies are good at distribution, they have always been bad on the subscriber equipment side.

    Here in Canada all of the cable and sat companies have very poor excuses for PVRs. I remember from the days of grey market US sats here that the Tivo kicked butt!

    I've been trying to get one up here in Canada forever!

  144. Re:We need an alternative media distribution syste by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

    There was that whole discussion with NetFlix a while back. Hopefully they'll be able to get that up and running by the end of the year.

    --


    _______________________________
    "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  145. Oh no3s!!11one! by beanlover · · Score: 1
  146. Wrong market by ad0gg · · Score: 1
    Tivo is in the recording market, not the content market. Tivo's competitors are the VCR, DVD recorders and other recorders. None of these charge a monthly fee, which why its delusional for Tivo to think they can charge $13 when they aren't supplying the content.

    People pay $50 a month for internet access(content provider). Do you think people would pay $13 a month for them to use their computer?

    For people to pay $13 a month, tivo has to add value. Guide service isn't enough. For $13 a month I can get sat radio(content).

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  147. ReplayTV by 9Nails · · Score: 1

    I'm also a ReplayTV subscriber. Recently my ReplayTV had a hard drive die. I've had it for 4 years now, but I didn't expect it to go this soon. The device is so integrated into my life style that I was emotionally upset when I couldn't time shift TV shows. I stoped watching TV to install a new hard drive! And I was up and running the next night. Then I used the Internet Share feature of ReplayTV to catch up on the shows that I missed. Gotta love it!

    My co-worker's cable company DVR can't Internet share shows. So this yet another advantage to having your own DVR service.

  148. Re:subscriptions hurt by Splork · · Score: 1

    lifetime is -important- because the subscription model prevents anyone from giving a TiVo as a gift. Nobody would like it if you bought them something than then required them to make regular payments to even turn it on.

    they should ditch subscriptions.

  149. DISH Network's PVR rocks by writertype · · Score: 1

    It might not have the "wishlist" feature, but it has:

    a "season pass"
    integrated 30-second skip and 10-second rewind features
    search
    scheduling
    dual-tuners
    100 hours recording time (might be more now)
    themes

    Tivo is still a bit easier to use and has a nicer interface, but I'm a satisfied DISH customer. (However, if my apartment complex allowed Cox or Chartered to provide cable instead of their horrid no-name provider, I might be an all-in-one cable PVR/Internet customer.)

    I'm not a big DSL fan, but I'd consider the DSL/satellite combo in the future.

  150. Got kids? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    Pause live TV is more important to 'new' parents than you can imagine.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  151. DirecTivo Slow Response To Record by Ch3t · · Score: 1

    I've noticed recently it takes a very long time for my DirecTivo to finally respond after clicking the Record button and confirming it. The delay is roughly the timespan of a commercial. Have any of you noticed this delay?

    --
    I thought I had an appetite for destruction, but all I really wanted was a club sandwich. --Homer J.
  152. Oh, don't tell me that! by rawg · · Score: 1

    I have been using Dish Network's DVR for one year now. All I can say is that their DVR sucks ass. It crashes all the time. When the show times change my DVR just tapes what's on in that slot. I'm constantly recording crap because the times are always changing.

    I was just getting ready to switch to Direct TV with TiVo so that I can record the shows I like and not miss them. Plus the dual tuner is a very nice option when you want to record two shows at the same time slot.

    Now I'm being told that TiVo is going under? I sure hope not. The subscription is worth getting to watch the shows. Basically they are working to keep the program guide updated. I don't mind paying for that.

    The only reason I signed up with Dish Network is because all my neighbors switched to them, and said they were better. From what I've seen about Direct TV, they have better, cheaper programming. Heck, I'm paying $50 a month and I don't even get TechTV (now gone and I never got to see it).

    --
    The above is not worth reading.
  153. TiVo probably deserves to die by podperson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a recent TiVo customer (who bought a lifetime subscription) I can't say I'm enormously impressed.

    First, key features that loyal customers raved about have been removed from more recent products (preseumably as a result of pressure from content-owners). So we have a product that in some ways is getting worse rather than better.

    Second, I find the interface quite clumsy. (Sure, it's PRETTY.) It seems like every operation has extra, pointless steps (many of which are confirming non-destructive operations). There is no undo (you can't undelete a program you just deleted in error). The remote control is almost axially symmetric, meaning that in the dark it's quite easy to point it in exactly the wrong direction.

    Third, the out-of-box experience is terrible. It initially needs several hours just to start working (I have no idea why) and it initially incorrectly identified where I live and refused to download the right TV timetable. Even when this was corrected, it continues to record infomercials and label them "Scrubs".

    Finally, TiVo persistently tries to sell stuff to you.

    TiVo's problems, I think, lie in (a) a failure to decide who their customer is and serve their needs and (b) a lack of attention to usability.

    Item (a) is a strategic problem (they seem torn between wanting to partner with content providers, wanting to become a content provider and sell their own advertising space, and wanting to become a video napster 1.0), whereas (b) is tactical (they simply need to stop paying attention to their fawning fans and do some serious self-criticism).

    1. Re:TiVo probably deserves to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) I'd like to know what these missing features are, because I haven't noticed a single feature being taken away. All that's happened to my Series 2 is the continual adding of features, one after the other. Based on the level of whining and bitching in this discussion thread, I'm evidently in the minority of people who like the ability to stream MP3s and photos from my PC to my Tivo. I wish they'd add the ability to stream video from PC to Tivo, that'd be the last spiffy feature I'd love to see.

      2a) There are shortcuts for many steps, which it sometimes lists on screens that you're apparently flying through in disgust instead of taking 15 seconds to learn how to make things faster that first time.

      2b) I grab my Tivo remote in the dark, put my thumb where the navigation wheel should be, if it's not there, flip it around. Wow. That's hard. Must've earned a PhD in remote controls, seeing how I have a Tivo, TV, VCR, DVD, and more remotes that are all axially symmetric. Well, that or I remember a time when there weren't any remotes, and when they came out, they were all axially symmetric, so I was forced to utilize grey matter to understand what was in my hand. "What's this? A hotdog? No. A Colt45? No. Ah, must be a remote, I wonder which one it is? I wonder if the IR transmitter is pointed the right way?"

      3a) Several hours? Holy crap, you're a modem user, aren't you? I did my initial setup over a cable connection - I don't even have an analog line - and it took less than 20 minutes to download and install (the latter was the majority of time spent) the major OS update for old boxes. Presumably if you bought direct from Tivo you should get the current OS and be able to skip this step, but brick and mortors take forever to go through old stock - not just of Tivo, but everything. That's why they end up with firesales when new models come out, because that's the only way they'll get off their ass and sell old stock.

      3b) As for your Scrubs issue, perhaps it's time for you to revisit your channel lineup selection. In my Tivo there's >4 different lineups that could possibly apply to my cable connection because Comcast has their heads surgically implanted in their rectum. Figuring out which applies is your responsibility, if you're posting on Slashdot you should be technical enough to understand how Tivo can't magically guess which one will work. And it's easy for you to figure it out. You check your channel lineup against the guide. If they don't match, switch. Check your entire channel lineup, not just a screen or two. When you finally figure out which is the right one, may I suggest forcing a manual network connection just in case you have outdated guide data for that lineup?

      4) Yeah, the main menu sell-sell-sell thing is annoying but certainly not the end of the world. It's down at the end of the list, I never highlight it unless I'm using one of those shortcuts to jump around menus. If you're objecting to it taking up a precious single line on your screen at the bottom of the top menu, go cry me a river.

  154. Re:subscriptions hurt by Akrat · · Score: 1

    We gave Tivo as a gift with a gift subscription for the monthly fee... If they don't want to pay the monthly fee when the subscription is over, the Tivo is still more intuitive than a VCR without the guide data.

  155. to all the whiners in tivo-wannabe land by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    What the fuck is wrong with all of you?

    You are too cheap to:

    1. buy TiVo with lifetime subscription
    2. buy TiVo with month to month
    3. buy anything new 'cuz it'll get cheap later

    How again do you get to complain about their services if you are not using them?

    I chose to support a cool company buy buying their box for $99 and then paying the monthly subscription for however long. Funny that... if others did the same this thread would not exist.

  156. I have paid my Tivo subscription for 6 years. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1
    I could have bought a lifetime subscription for a measly $150 back in the day. Why do I keep paying? Because it is worth every single penny of every single month I pay this. Their programming guide info is so accurate, so so complete that anyone trying to compare it to the other PVRs out there (I have tried nearly all of them) is just absolutely nuts. The charm of the Tivo is not just its elegant interface, but the absolute detail of their guide data. They provide every bit of detail you need to find your shows, with very long descriptions and rating schemes. Most of their competitors only have two or three sentences max for each show listing. Tivo usually has an entire paragraph filled with actors, ratings, content type, repeat info and so much more.

    Their competetition can keep putting out new DVRs, but as long as they're a pile of crud, i'll stick with my Tivo until the end of time. An HD PVR with really crummy guide data is entirely useless to me.

  157. how do I get updates? by SQLz · · Score: 1

    I love my Tivo, there is no other way to watch tv. What do I do when they go away? How do I get my updates?

  158. TIVO fees with DirecTV by juksey · · Score: 1

    You cant really look at it as a $9.98 charge though ($4.99 additional reciever fee $4.99 DVR service fee) for 2 reasons. First: If this is your only reciever or your primary reciever, you are not paying the $4.99 additional reciever fee. Second: if it is your second reciever you would be paying the additional reciever fee even if you didnt have a DVR reciever. The $4.99 DVR service fee covers the DVR funcionality for all the recievers on your account, so you only need to pay it once. Also the DVR service fee is waived if you subscribe to DTVs Total Choice Premier package which includes all the premium services (HBO, Showtime...) for $90.99 with local channels.

    1. Re:TIVO fees with DirecTV by hawk · · Score: 1

      There is a $10/month difference between having a single regular regular receiver and a single regular plus a tivo, how's that? :)

      I was disputing the claim that you don't pay ther regular $5 on a tivo, just the tivo fee, which isn't correct.

      hawk

  159. On Demand is NOTHING like TiVo by merlyn · · Score: 1
    Comcast "On Demand" is nothing at all like a TiVo. Anyone who can compare the two in the same sentence has not played with both. And shame on the cable companies for trying to position it as the same.

    The menus of "On Demand" are hard to navigate. And once you start playing a program, you end up back at the top menu again, not where you were, near other similar programs. You can't search. You can't skip forward into a program faster than 3x or so. It's just plain slow and ugly. And you can't view or save arbitrary content (like every episode of SG-1): you get only what they want you to get "on demand".

    I see on-demand as a (poor) complement to TiVo, but definitely not a replacement.

  160. How TIVO can survive. by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1

    Sell a box after this summer that easily allows me to mod it and override the controls of the damn broadcast flags. Become the crowbar of the 21 century.

  161. Re:Star Trek Enterprise, Arrested Development, etc by mollymoo · · Score: 1
    TiVo really needs to turn itself into a delivery platform if it wants to survive.

    It just needs to be a platform. They are selling it as a hardware+software bundle. They need to decide what they do - provide a service or make hardware. If they opened the interfaces and provided good tools, to make it easy for $50 Chinese hardware to access their pay service, I think they'd do a lot better.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  162. If Tivo wants to survive... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    If Tivo wants to survive...

    ...they need to quit removing features (e.g. instant commercial skip) and kowtowing to the MPAA. The MPAA is not their customer base.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  163. "On Demand" not like Tivo at all... by javaxman · · Score: 1
    It'd be nice if folks could see through the "On Demand" stuff... it' s so not like Tivo. It's watching what someone else wants to watch, without the choices or control of TiVo. It totally misses the point.

    I can wait for it all to come together, I know how to program my VCR.

    Also totally missing the point. Do you program your VCR? I know how to, but I rarely did.

    Right now, TCM ( Turner Classic Movies, I think ) is showing a long, long list of old ( and less old ) Oscar-winning and nominated movies, which our TiVo list has maybe 8 or 9 of right now. Would we have recorded those on our VCR? If I had a 12-hour tape... no. Not ever. Neither would you.

    Simply put, On Demand and VCR just don't compare to a good DVR, and folks who think they do just don't get it, because they don't have it...

    Hey, TiVo ain't dead yet, they've got a base of 3 million or so users...

  164. I'm pulling for Tivo! Can Adversity force Change? by toccoa · · Score: 1
    I really am pulling for Tivo!


    I am sure it is tough competing with the cable companies. I hope cablecard works out.

    And I never understood the lifetime subscription complaints. I do not like subscriptions but just think of the price of the Tivo as $300 higher.

    And I think the "Why buy Intel chips when sand is so cheap" crowd either have never used Tivo or have an extremely low value of their time/convenience


    I just got Moxie from Charter but also kept my series 2 Tivo. The Tivo season pass is clearly better. And the EVIL cable company changed the 30-second skip button to be 900 seconds The 30-second button is HUGELY important to me.


    But the Moxie is dual tuner and HD. Those are big features that IMHO Tivo is way late in addressing.

    Tivo needs a dual tuner, HD recorder with either huge disk available or preferablely a way to add Firewire drives. If it has to wait until 2006, then early 2006 would be better. Mac support for TivoToGo would be nice as would wired ethernet instead of 802.11b.

    And if Tivo decides that their leaning towards the Dark Side is not getting them any friends and gets desparate, then perhaps they might risk making more consumer-friendly decisions in regards to DRM and Tivo-to-go and moving video around the network.

  165. ReplayTV Now Part of Denon-Marantz by meehawl · · Score: 1

    ReplayTV is probably not going to survive either

    ReplayTV has been part of the company that does Denon and Marantz, among others. The ReplayTV functionality has been rolled into their high-end, $4000+ audiophile media servers. And for them that's the low-end. So yeah, I don't know if ReplayTV the low-end consumer brand will survive or grow, but the technology itself seems to becoming integrated into their home entertainment suite.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:ReplayTV Now Part of Denon-Marantz by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Thanks for the info.

      Is the service still available for people who, for instance, buy old boxes on ebay?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  166. ReplayTV Now Part of Denon-Marantz by meehawl · · Score: 1

    I thought Replay was out of business. Am I wrong?

    SonicBlue did go bust and sold off its assets. ReplayTV has been part of the company that does Denon and Marantz, among others, for a few years now. The ReplayTV functionality has been rolled into their high-end, $4000+ audiophile media servers. And for them that's the low-end. So yeah, I don't know if ReplayTV the low-end consumer brand will survive or grow, but the technology itself seems to becoming integrated into their home entertainment suite.

    --

    Da Blog
  167. Not A Chance. ReplayTV Tried All This Years Ago. by meehawl · · Score: 1

    the anti-cable, letting us download, store, organize, and serve media from both cable and -- this is the important part -- the internet.

    ReplayTV tried this a few years ago. Automatic commercial skip, sharing shows without DRM over the internet. *Massive* online database of shows stored on other ReplayTV owners' hard drives - nearest damn thing to VOD I've seen working!

    All it got them was sued to death and a 3% marketshare versus the industry cum-sucking yes men at Tivo.

    --

    Da Blog
  168. Charged a lot less? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say what cable company have you got?

    1. Re:Charged a lot less? by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      Time Warner Cable - 5.95$ / month.

  169. You could Open Source it? Hmmmm That would do more by Michael_Angel · · Score: 1

    A product thats dieing.. based on Linux...
    Its cool.. many try to imitate it , frig, if it was opensourced it would be like the wrt54g router. start out with one fork then before you know it have like 5 firmwares and software better then all the original stuff.

    Heck the company could start concentrating on hardware and selling just harddware.

    Hello out there, can anyone hear me.

    Well there pride will die with it then I guess..

    It had to be said... From the you-know-its-true-and-would-buy-one-if-you-knew-it -had-Open-source-support-behind-it people.

    ahh what was I thinking we live in a world where one can patent something they never made cause its never been patented. and scare people into paying for it. now wait maybe vote for bush..

  170. No - Tivo'ing in Canada is very easy by kafka47 · · Score: 1
    You have to be an expert level linux hacker to get it runnning though.

    You may not be aware, ok, actually you aren't aware that getting Tivo to run in Canada (or anywhere outside of the U.S.) is an extremely easy process!

    All you need :

    • Cable subscription
    • Tivo box (preferably Series 1)
    • Broadband or semi-dedicated Internet
    • Null modem cable and adaptor
    • Piece of software called, "Simplicity"

    1. Connect the Tivo to a laptop via the modem cable.
    2. Setup the Tivo to "dial" the modem (very easy to do, its a few keystrokes on the tivo remote)
    3. Run the "simplicity" software on the laptop.
    4. Watch Simplicity take care of the rest.

    You get full Tivo functionality, including livetv pause, adaptive recording, seasons pass, etc.

    I would happily pay for this service gladly in Canada. Unfortunately, its not available nor are there plans to do so, so I don't even get the choice. But, with obtaining cable tv guide info on the web and using this little program, my tivo is as happy as if it were in its home country. I will tell you, using Tivo has made me actually watch TV, versus having gone for years without. Incidentally, I am more exposed to television advertising (since, well, I'm actually watching the thing now).

    The archaic days of blind tv broadcasting are essentially, and gladly, over.

    Cheers,
    Kafka

  171. Sorry to see that. by tgd · · Score: 1

    You've got a limited satellite HD PVR that will cease working in six months when DirectTV goes MPEG4 for all their HD broadcasts.

    They'll replace it with a nice non-Tivo HD unit for you, however.

    1. Re:Sorry to see that. by koreth · · Score: 1

      Got a source for that prediction?

    2. Re:Sorry to see that. by tgd · · Score: 1

      Um. DirectTV?

      They're no longer in partnership with Tivo, they are using another provider for DVR functionality, and they're moving to MPEG4.

      Do some Google searching, or go read avsforums. There's TONS of info out there about it.

      Its great they're actually giving a decent credit to the people who bought those units, but people who like the "Tivo" software itself are going to be very disappointed when they realize they paid $999 for a paperweight.

  172. Service As Usual by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Is the service still available for people who, for instance, buy old boxes on ebay?

    Well, you can buy new boxes if you like. But yes, people do buy the older boxes (RTV5040 models) because they feature the auto commercial skip and show sharing without any hacking required...

    No ReplayTV info is complete without mentioning DVArchive, Poopli (like Napster for RTVs), and PlanetReplay.

    --

    Da Blog
  173. CORRECTION: wrong username by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 1
    There was a guy named "lenticular" on the old Motley Fool message board for TIVO that would relentlessly do the same thing.
    Oops! My bad - it was not "lenticular" who was astroturfing on the Motley Fool TIVO board. I believe that the poster I was thinking of was "mojodeal". If you're reading this lenticular, sorry about the mix-up. I don't know why your username came to mind, but I think it may have been because I found some of your posts on technical analysis interesting.