Slashdot Mirror


Would You Install Pirated Software at Work?

An anonymous reader asks: "I am an IT professional, and due to budget constraints, I have been told to install multiple copies of MS Office, despite offering to install OpenOffice, and other OpenSource Office products. Even though most of the uses are for people using Excel like a database, or formatting of text in cells, other programs are not tolerated. I have been over ruled by our controller, to my disagreement. I would never turn them in, but I am in tough place by knowing doing something illegal. I want to keep my job, but disagree with some of the decision making on this issue. Other than drafting a letter to the owners of the company on how I disagree with the policy, what else can I do?"

848 comments

  1. Just watch your back by AmIAnAi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You must ask yourself: if they're willing to overrule you and insist you commit an illegal act, how are they going to behave should this come to the attention of FAST (or other enforcement body)? My guess is they will dump it all on your shoulders. If they don't play by the rules now, they certainly will not start when their backs are against the wall.

    I suggest you document everything, off site and get your CV circulated immediately.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
    1. Re:Just watch your back by Pinkfud · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering that I work for the US Government, no. Beyond that, I agree with your reply.

      --
      The world is my oyster. That's why it's always in a stew.
    2. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suggest you document everything, off site and get your CV circulated immediately.

      That's the only sensible course of action here, but I would add: do NOT do something illegal on behalf of your employer, ever, even if means quitting on the spot. No job is worth the hit you will personally take when it comes out. "I was just following orders" doesn't cut much ice with the military when lives are on the line, and will cut absolutely none if you knowingly broke the law just to make money for your employer. The fact that you documented knowingly breaking the law is going to be worth nothing in court, either.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:Just watch your back by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You work for the government and you don't think they'll dump possible licensing issues on your shoulders? No offense but that's a bit naive, the gov is MORE likely to do that than your average company, not less, as has been shown by the large number of times a low level person in the government is fired for one of the big timer's mistakes. If I were you I'd get those documents in triplicate in different places...

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    4. Re:Just watch your back by cliffski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why would he have to quit? Just don't do it. What is the worst that can happen? they fire you? I don't know US law but in the UK, that would be clear cut unfair dismissal and they could be severely punished by the courts. I doubt you are a union member, but if you are, this is the kind of thing you would have them handle.
      It amazes me that execs in companies can be such thieving bastards, even in companies that themselves make software. If it was somehow necessary for you to quit, then I would 100% definitely report them to FAST if they went ahead anyway. In any case, it sounds like a pretty low-life employer, so your medium to long term plan should be to leave anyway.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    5. Re:Just watch your back by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 0

      What's the worst that could happen?
      They could make his life hell for the next 6 months. Then they could fire him after "finding" child porn and Al Queda bomb instruction manuals on his pirated-software laden work PC. Which they would turn over to the police department and local vigilante organizations.

      Think they wouldn't do it? They're Pirates. Haven't you ever read Treasure Island?

      What he should do is agree to do it and request a raise and/or promotion out of the money that is saved.
    6. Re:Just watch your back by Mistlefoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What would you do if your boss asked you to burn a cd full of mp3's he downloaded via peer to peer?

      I'm really not trying to troll here........and I really do believe that:

      1) Pirating software for home use is minor
      2) Pirating software for a business (or for the purpose of making money FROM that software) is not so minor

      But really, you have mentioned "most of the uses are for people using Excel like a database, or formatting of text in cells".

      I suppose if you answer the initial question I posed by burning him the CD you must then decide the moral implications yourself.

      Obviously, you need to protect your ass either way.

    7. Re:Just watch your back by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if they're willing to overrule you and insist you commit an illegal act

      I wasn't aware that installing multiple copies of Office in excess of the number that you've licensed was illegal. It's definitely a violation of the software license, but illegal? I have a hard time seeing criminal charges result from something like this.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:Just watch your back by tehwebguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wouldn't he be legally responsible for taking that action, even if he were ordered to do so?

      --
      -- lol pwned
    9. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      why would he have to quit?

      I did say "even if" it means quitting on the spot. That may well be the outcome, when Mr Executive says "Well, either you follow our instructions or we let you go."

      I don't know US law but in the UK, that would be clear cut unfair dismissal and they could be severely punished by the courts.

      US employment law is completely different to that in the UK. In particular, IIRC most US states are still "at will" states, where either party may terminate an employment contract without notice, and for any reason not explicitly prohibited (e.g., by anti-discrimination legislation).

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    10. Re:Just watch your back by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if you make copys that you are not licensed to make and you can't justify them under fair use (unlikely in this situation) you are infringing copyright in most of the world there are both civial and criminal penalties that can be brought though the criminal ones tend to have some minimum level of infringement and don't tend to be used as much (in lots of places only the government can bring criminal charges and unless you are blatently selling pirate software they are unlikely to do so).

      but attempts to hold you liable for damages and/or foist the blame on you thereby destorying your reputation are very likely as part of a coverup.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    11. Re:Just watch your back by qnxdude · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In British Columbia, it doesn't even take that. I was recently fired for doing the unthinkable.. having children. after my daughter was born, i was informed that my having children was disruptive to the work environment (i requested a week leave to help my wife out with the newborn) and was informed that my services were no longer desired. it took 2 weeks to get my tools back, and my own personal laptop, which i had brought to work so that i could drop it off at the computer shop after work for a ram upgrade, was wiped. I went to no less than 3 lawyers, who all informed my that the only liability a company has is 2 weeks severance or notice.. so my advise to the OP is, document everything, find another job, and turn them over to the authorities.

    12. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      not explicitly prohibited

      In most states, it is explicitly prohibited to terminate an employee who refuses to perform an illegal action on part of the company.

    13. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I wouldn't burn the CDs either. For one thing, I think the basic premise of copyright is a reasonable, practical idea and I don't consider ripping the fruits of others' labours without compensation to have any sort of moral or ethical basis. For another, even if it were a "minor" crime in isolation, committing it under those circumstances would not just be breaking the law, but doing so for personal profit (if it's part of the job for which I am being paid), which as far as I'm concerned makes it not minor at all.

      I think you're confusing me with another poster on some of your comment, BTW.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    14. Re:Just watch your back by goodtim · · Score: 1, Insightful

      US employment law is completely different to that in the UK. In particular, IIRC most US states are still "at will" states, where either party may terminate an employment contract without notice, and for any reason not explicitly prohibited (e.g., by anti-discrimination legislation).

      You seemed to have missed the point somewhat. They are asking him to commit a crime. An employer can not ask you to do that, and fire you when you refuse. If they did, you would have the option of going to court and suing for wrongful termination, but its probably not worth the effort. So you are right in some respects, but you still have legal recourse in this situation.

      If I were the poster, I would just do it, and stash away the relevent communications directing me to do so. Then I would begin looking for a new job where management is not a bunch of cheap bastards. If shit hits the fan, and they try to blame me, at least I documentation, and better yet, a new job.

      --
      "Flee at once, all is discovered."
    15. Re:Just watch your back by shark72 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The threshold for criminal infringement is pretty low -- just $1,000 worth of stuff within 180 days. If he's being asked to install Office Professional 2007, he'd hit that (well... $999.90) with two installations.

      But to your point -- I believe the common threshold for actual prosecution is much higher... in the five figure range. Bigger fish, and all that.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    16. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes.

      It is your responsibility to disobey illegal orders.

    17. Re:Just watch your back by billcopc · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it: Whenever your employer (or a client) makes you do something you don't agree to, Cover Your Ass. Document everything... phone calls, emails, dates, times. Then start looking for a job elsewhere if you can. You're better off taking a new job now, than having to explain yourself in an interview after the ship has sunk.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    18. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you know something illegal is going on and you don't say anything about it, you can be held liable if things turn sour. I don't know how safe you will be under the "I was just following orders" defence. Especially if the company starts playing the victim and says that they have no idea that pirated software is being implemented.

    19. Re:Just watch your back by Demena · · Score: 0

      You got bad legal advice from a lazy lawyer

    20. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You seem to be confusing the broader concept of illegal (violating the law) with the distinction made between criminal and civil law. Something can be "against the law" but not criminal.

      Also, copyright violation can, in some circumstances, be criminal. If the infringement is "willful" and the total value of the software exceeds $1000, the guy could be charged criminally.

    21. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you're confusing me with another poster on some of your comment, BTW. Probably me. We do have similar names.
    22. Re:Just watch your back by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even in states with "at will" employment, you might still have some legal recourse with a "wrongful termination" suit in a situation like this. You won't get your job back, but you might get some other court-imposed judgment out of them (i.e. cash).

      As in so many Ask Slashdots, the answer to this one includes the instruction, "Consult an attorney". The OP needs to find out what his legal rights are in his jurisdiction. In the meantime, document this situation clearly: Put your objections into a memo, addressed to everyone up the chain of command, and request the instructions to install unlicensed software in writing. Following Orders With Objection puts you in a better position than Just Following Orders.

      In case you haven't already pursued this, try to find someone in executive management who is willing to listen to you. Talk to the Legal department or the company's counsel. The senior execs will probably never listen to you (mine never have), but they might listen to someone else in management. This is the approach I took in my first job out of college, where the entire corporate office was being run on a single retail copy of Lotus 123 and WordPerfect, and POs for new computers would come back from Purchasing with the software line-items crossed out "because we already have this". Once Executive Management understood the possible consequences of this approach, I was finally allowed to buy software with all new PCs, and eventually the pirated installs found their way into landfills and the company was legal.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    23. Re:Just watch your back by SEE · · Score: 3, Informative
      Installing multiple copies of Office without a license constitutes copyright infringement, as you are making copies of a copyrighted work (Office) without permission of the copyright holder.

      Now, let's look at the law regarding copyright infringement:

      U.S. Code, Title 17, Section 506:

      (a) Criminal Infringement. - Any person who infringes a copyright willfully either -

      (1) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain, or

      (2) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000,

      shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, United States Code.


      US Code, Title 18, section 2319:

      (a) Whoever violates section 506 (a) (relating to criminal offenses) of title 17 shall be punished as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section and such penalties shall be in addition to any other provisions of title 17 or any other law.
      (b) Any person who commits an offense under section 506 (a)(1) of title 17--
      (1) shall be imprisoned not more than 5 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of at least 10 copies or phonorecords, of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $2,500;
      (2) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense is a second or subsequent offense under paragraph (1); and
      (3) shall be imprisoned not more than 1 year, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, in any other case.

      (c) Any person who commits an offense under section 506 (a)(2) of title 17, United States Code--
      (1) shall be imprisoned not more than 3 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution of 10 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of $2,500 or more;
      (2) shall be imprisoned not more than 6 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense is a second or subsequent offense under paragraph (1); and
      (3) shall be imprisoned not more than 1 year, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000.
    24. Re:Just watch your back by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Actually, even Microsoft says that it's always the management's responsiblity to ensure all the copies are licensed. Just make sure you do an accurate inventory, submit to management that they are short X number of licenses, and what they do after that is up to them.

      Of course, this assumes you use the OEM versions.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    25. Re:Just watch your back by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but worst case you get unemployment. "Why were you fired?" "I refused to install illegal software." *approved*

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    26. Re:Just watch your back by bataras · · Score: 1

      this is true. In the US (California at least), you -cannot- be fired for refusing to do something illegal.

      Start wearing a wire.

    27. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ok sheridan

    28. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You should look for better legal advice - under BC Human Rights legistlation, you cannot fired/discriminated against due to family status. Look into filing a Huamn Rights Complaint (you can even do so without a lawyer).

      www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/H/96210_01.htm#secti on13 ... section that applies

      www.bchrt.bc.ca - BC Human Rights Tribunal ... contact info

    29. Re:Just watch your back by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Your lawyer sucks ass. For one, where's the charges or threats of legal action you pushed for their computer trespass?

    30. Re:Just watch your back by Jeehoba · · Score: 1

      Just a thought, but last time i checked the reward for turning in someone like this was about 250K. Have someone else do by refusing with the CYA email. When installed turn them in and profit. Im not knocking you, but I am betting that if you are installing Office for end users you job isnt going to pay you 250K for at least several years.

    31. Re:Just watch your back by ibi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You seemed to have missed the point somewhat. They are asking him to commit a crime. An employer can not ask you to do that, and fire you when you refuse. If they did, you would have the option of going to court and suing for wrongful termination, but its probably not worth the effort. So you are right in some respects, but you still have legal recourse in this situation. So I'm curious (not really knowing) as to what the reality is. Is the reality

      1) "They'll fire your ass for insubordination and if you complain about it they'll bury you. Sure you can, in theory, sue them for "wrongful termination" but you'll probably never get another job in the US if you do. And they have more money than you do, so they'll likely win in court, anyway"

      Or is it

      2) "If you refuse the illegal order and they fire you, you'll be fine. Most companies actually try to follow the law and expect their employees to, also. They'd be happy to hire someone who draws the line at violating the law when ordered to by a superior. And the court will frown on a company retaliating on a law-abiding employee and will compensate you accordingly."

      I've been lucky enough (and picked my employers carefully enough, perhaps :-) to never have to find out. But reading the WSJ suggests that maybe #1 is closer to reality than #2. But I don't really know. I imagine the OP would like to know for sure before he makes his next move ....

      And don't discount the value of doing what's right for right's sake. There's a lot to be said for maintaining personal integrity simply because it's part of who you are (to yourself even if no one else acknowledges it) ...
    32. Re:Just watch your back by mysidia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Talk to the Legal department or the company's counsel. The senior execs will probably never listen to you (mine never have), but they might listen to someone else in management.

      I would suggest Legal department/counsel, if your company has one, is where you should be going if you are concerned with legal ramifications -- that's their job, they are the ones paid to determine what is and isn't the best legal way to proceed.

      Installing multiple copies of Office is not illegal, but copyright infringment is, and it's up to the lawyers to sort out what can and cannot be done, to minimize liability.

      And they may know things you don't know, like special super-secret deals the company may have signed out with software vendors, that you're not privvy to or allowed to know about.

      If the lawyers who specialize in the law and representing the company say it's OK and sign their name to it, then you have to take their word on the matter, even if you personally disagree -- it's their a** on the line, not yours.

    33. Re:Just watch your back by seebs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not all illegal acts are criminal. Junk faxes aren't criminal, but they're illegal and expose the senders to liability. Mmm, tasty liability.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    34. Re:Just watch your back by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An employer can not ask you to do that, and fire you when you refuse.

      Employers have a lot of ways to terminate an employee though. A buddy of mine was terminated because he was not "flexible" enough for the team. Odd thing is that his last performance review listed one of his strengths as being "flexible". He was terminated because he disagreed with how the company did their bidding process for a mapping project. He provided time estimates for paper to digital conversion and management cut the time to win the work. Problem is that he'd be blamed later when things weren't being completed on time. All the HR department needed to do was write a reasonable explanation in the employee file and it becomes very difficult to go after the employer.

      I certainly don't know this guys complete situation (finances, job industry in his area, family issues, etc...) but I'd contact BSA, start looking for a new employer, and cooperate in the investigation. Between the time of the report to BSA and the time period where the employer could comfortably terminate me, I'm pretty confident I'd have a new job.

    35. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happens all the time.

      Does your CEO understand the liability situation the company is in? And the ethical issue? Have this discussion and keep records. Speak to HR and Legal (assuming you have such departments). Start looking for another job; if the company can't abide by some degree of ethics, let alone legality, you shouldn't be working there.

      By own personal take is that if you're profiting (or hope to) and you use the software as part of business operations, you must pay. Especially considering that OpenOffice is superior in many ways (save as PDF was loved by our marketing and sales departments).

    36. Re:Just watch your back by pestilence669 · · Score: 1

      Right. Get documentation, emails, etc. If they fire you, or even threaten you, for refusing to break the law, call a lawyer and get paid. Don't feel bad for guys with golden parachutes. If the BSA comes to visit, will they come to your defense or let you take the fall?

      Nothing pisses me off more than people being cheap to the point of stealing, especially when they have plenty of money. If your company cannot afford Microsoft software, then they do not get the luxury of having it. Period.

      It's one thing to be fifteen and use a stolen copy of Photoshop at home. It's something else entirely to run a profitable business and continue to steal whatever you want. It's deplorable, unprofessional, and illegal.

    37. Re:Just watch your back by narkalepse · · Score: 1

      Employment law varies state to state in the US. In my state we a have an "at will" employment law. I can leave, or they can fire me, at any time for any reason, except discrimination. The employers don't need a reason to let someone go.

      --
      ~Why even bother.
    38. Re:Just watch your back by soleblaze · · Score: 1

      Plus I hear the BSA gives a nice percentage to the whistleblower.

    39. Re:Just watch your back by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

      Hi Brave Guy -

      Actually, even in an "At Will" state there are significant restrictions on the ability to fire folks. Refusing to commit a crime and then being fired for it, if one of those things that will get the state and federal departments of labor engaged with all of their attention.

      It is called "wrongful discharge". Bad things to be facing as an employer. If they create an environment that forcing you to resign it is called "retaliation" and creating a "hostile work enviroment". Again bad, very bad, things to be facing as an employer.

      Be sure and document what you were asked to do and why you were asked to do it. Be sure and write any letters, etc., on your own time and your own equipment. Be sure and create a paper trail with date and time stamps. Start keeping a log of what you were asked to do, what you did, and then what was done to you.

      Of course, be sure that your hands are clean before this happens. Ensure that your work system doesn't have you visiting porn sites during working hours, etc.

      Yours,

      Jordan

    40. Re:Just watch your back by Lil+Jen · · Score: 1

      Good point. I wouldn't trust your employer. If you could lose your job for NOT doing something illegal, then get outta there. Or better yet, act responsibly, don't follow orders, get fired, and then take their asses to court. Keep it well documented though. Or get another job. Or pirate it, and sweat it out.

      --
      Hawaii or bust!!!
    41. Re:Just watch your back by Genocaust · · Score: 3, Informative

      Being "ordered to" stands no ground in the military (I'm currently enlisted) if it is an illegal directive. I'm sure the civilian world holds quite true. My contract and enlistment oath says I swore to "obey all LAWFUL orders", and they're quite quick to fry anybody woh does something illegal with the cop-out "but I was ordered to...."

      --
      It could be that the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others.
    42. Re:Just watch your back by Bogtha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's the only sensible course of action here, but I would add: do NOT do something illegal on behalf of your employer

      Ditto. An old boss of mine was a bit of a bully, and one day he called me into a private meeting and asked me to break into an ex-employee's server to see if they'd copied any of our code (it was actually quite likely). I told him point blank that I wouldn't be doing it and suggested he talk to a solicitor about the suspected copyright infringement. His response? "Oh. Um, okay." It's the quickest I ever saw him back down on anything by miles.

      The thing is, they already know they are in the wrong and are sticking their neck out by asking you to do it. It would take a real psychopath to attempt to force you into it after you refuse. Normal people, even nightmare bosses, are going to back down immediately.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    43. Re:Just watch your back by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Office Normally has its DRM stuff just make sure it works the way it was to and point out to you boss that because of DRM the software will not work. Sorry, I didn't write the software, we will probably need to get legit versions. Or use a mostly compatible product.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    44. Re:Just watch your back by module0000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nope. If directly ordered by a employing corporation, you fall under
      corporate immunity. Contractors need not apply.

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    45. Re:Just watch your back by morari · · Score: 0

      That depends on who you ask... I'm going to go with Milgram on this one though.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    46. Re:Just watch your back by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      So if your employer orders you to kill someone you'd do it because you're convinced it falls under 'corporate immunity'?

      Sorry, if you commit an illegal act you are held responsible, in any legal process. The company may *also* be held responsible, but that won't save you.

    47. Re:Just watch your back by DirtyShaman · · Score: 1

      Am I an idiot for thinking this guy is just a bit too much of a goody two-shoes? You're worried about installing copied software? I'm guessing that you don't have much pirated software at your house. What are you worried about in terms of getting in trouble? Are you worried about just getting fired? Or maybe even some litigation? I don't really know what the problem is, if they're that bad just quit. Otherwise suck it up and install the damn software. Jeez, I've used more pirated copies of office than I can shake a stick at. If your worried about cracking under the painful whip of the BSA inquisitor, just remember, there is always plausible deniability. Maybe you thought the corporate licensing plan covered multiple installs. Maybe the same key got written down multiple times instead of the correct one. The point is that there are about 10 million possible excuses you could make none of which involve your incarceration or a lawsuit. Install the software and get over it. You won't get thrown in jail, nor is anyone going to point the finger at you, nor will you lose your job. Unless of course you can't handle the stress on your concience of knowing that you did a possibly immoral thing and that you'll burn for all eternity in the blazing hot fires of hell.

    48. Re:Just watch your back by module0000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny you should mention that. And the answer is yes, it would fall under corporate immunity.
      However, they would argue a gross lapse of common sense, and probably still find a way to charge you.
      Google for "murder & corporate immunity" to hear about fun cases where that exact same thing has happened.

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    49. Re:Just watch your back by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      In the UK even if you had to quit it comes under 'constructive dismissal' - ie. they didn't give you a choice. They don't have to fire you, just say something like 'do $illegal_act or we'll make your life hell/demote you/cut your pay/whatever'.

    50. Re:Just watch your back by jonom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worked for Oliver North.

    51. Re:Just watch your back by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      US employment law is completely different to that in the UK. In particular, IIRC most US states are still "at will" states, where either party may terminate an employment contract without notice, and for any reason not explicitly prohibited (e.g., by anti-discrimination legislation).

      So you are saying the US needs to catch up with other countries in its employment legislation. Where I live in Canada the employer would have their ass handed to them for firing someone for not complying with an illegal demand. It seems like common sense: You can't force an employee to do something illegal, and you can't fire them if they refuse to do something illegal. Pretty damn simple.

      Of course if it were me where I live, I'd be an ass about not complying with their request in hopes that they fire me so I could get a nice cash settlement. No one wants to work at a place like that, but quitting sucks (no severance pay).

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    52. Re:Just watch your back by terjeber · · Score: 1

      This is bad advice. He is personally responsible for what he does, no matter what his boss is telling him to do. If they get audited, no matter what kind of record he has documenting he was ordered to do this, he is responsible and will pay the price.

      This is what he should do:

      • Stick to your guns. Don't install the software. Document this.
      • Tell them that if they are not willing to accept that, they are going to have to fire you.
      • If the fire you, sue their asses.
    53. Re:Just watch your back by b1ad3runn3r · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points you'd be at least +1 Amazingly Fantastic Reference higher.

      --
      "Reality continues to ruin my life" - Calvin and Hobbes
    54. Re:Just watch your back by sethawoolley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ollie was under the assumption that it was a legal act. They were under the presumption they had found a loophole in the law. Debate that as much as you want, but that's the context.

    55. Re:Just watch your back by lpcustom · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://jobsearchtech.about.com/cs/labor_laws/a/whi stle_blower.htm You would be held liable if you performed the illegal act(even if it's an order), but you are protected by law if you tell on the company for it's illegal activity.

      --
      Beer! It's what's for breakfast!
    56. Re:Just watch your back by sibertater · · Score: 1

      Qui Tam Legislation might offer some protection, but he has to have a documented plan. If he doesn't have a documented plan, it is his fault and he gets to pay the price for doing something he knows is illegal.

    57. Re:Just watch your back by dan828 · · Score: 1

      Not really. He was found guilty, but since congress had granted him blanket immunity to testify before during congressional hearings, his conviction was thrown out. The politicians were looking to nail more senior people, and in pursuit of that, made it so North couldn't go to jail for what he did.

    58. Re:Just watch your back by mstahl · · Score: 1

      Yep. See also: Nuremberg (my apoloies for TOTALLY inappropriate reference; that is where that legal precedent was set, at least for international law).

      Seriously though. They can't rightfully fire you for refusing to do something illegal. If they do, sue them for wrongful termination.

    59. Re:Just watch your back by terjeber · · Score: 1

      US employment law is completely different to that in the UK. In particular, IIRC most US states are still "at will" states, where either party may terminate an employment contract without notice, and for any reason not explicitly prohibited (e.g., by anti-discrimination legislation).

      So you are saying the US needs to catch up with other countries in its employment legislation.

      Even in the US, most states have wrongful termination laws (I don't know of any that doesn't). Being dismissed for refusing to break the law is high on the list of things the legislators wants to punish hard. If he sticks to his guns and documents his actions (while getting legal advice - he can get that for free at this stage in most places in the US) and they start trying to push him out, he would probably end up with a nice cash settlement from the company that would allow him to take a 6 months vacation somewhere nice - punitive damage compensation in the US can reach interesting figures.

    60. Re:Just watch your back by askreet · · Score: 1

      In the US it depends on the state. Some states are 'at-will' employment where they really don't need a reason to fire you, and so long as you can't prove it was discriminatory then it's okay. Other states have a law against 'unlawful termination', which is probably identical to 'unfair dismissal'.

    61. Re:Just watch your back by terjeber · · Score: 1

      US employment law is completely different to that in the UK. In particular, IIRC most US states are still "at will" states, where either party may terminate an employment contract without notice, and for any reason not explicitly prohibited (e.g., by anti-discrimination legislation).
      So you are saying the US needs to catch up with other countries in its employment legislation.

      Sorry for the double post - should have preview'ed

      Even in the US, most states have wrongful termination laws (I don't know of any that doesn't). Being dismissed for refusing to break the law is high on the list of things the legislators wants to punish hard. If he sticks to his guns and documents his actions (while getting legal advice - he can get that for free at this stage in most places in the US) and they start trying to push him out, he would probably end up with a nice cash settlement from the company that would allow him to take a 6 months vacation somewhere nice - punitive damage compensation in the US can reach interesting figures.

    62. Re:Just watch your back by ZmaniacZ · · Score: 1

      It's easier than all that. Call up Microsoft. Let them know they should start a license audit. MS has audit clauses in everything they do. Make sure MS keeps your name quiet and let the audit firm deal with management. Much more fun to watch auditors make managers squirm.

    63. Re:Just watch your back by mattmatt · · Score: 1

      Indeed. "I was just following orders" is no excuse.

    64. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can someone explain this reference?

    65. Re:Just watch your back by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      Hadn't heard that before but I've been fortunate to work at companies that were pretty thorough about keeping the systems legal.

    66. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Captain John Sheridan: May I have your attention please. In the last few hours, we have learned that warships are coming this way from Earth. Their orders are to seize command of Babylon 5 by force. As commanding officer and military governor of Babylon 5, I cannot allow this to happen. President Clark has violated the Earth Alliance Constitution: by dissolving the Senate, declaring martial law, and *personally* ordering the bombing of civilian targets on the Mars colony. He is *personally* responsible for the deaths of hundreds of innocent people. Following these attacks, Orion 7 and Proxima 3 have broken away from the Earth Alliance, and declared independence. Babylon 5 now joins with them. As of this moment, Babylon 5 is seceding from the Earth Alliance. We will remain an independent state till President Clark is removed from office. At the end of this current crisis, anyone who wishes to leave for Earth is free to do so. Meanwhile for your own safety, I urge everyone to stay in your quarters until this is over. That is all.

    67. Re:Just watch your back by drDugan · · Score: 1

      Blackwater... ?

    68. Re:Just watch your back by rizzo320 · · Score: 1

      What would you do if your boss asked you to burn a cd full of mp3's he downloaded via peer to peer?


      I see where you are trying to go with this analogy. However, it is not an illegal act to burn a disk full of mp3's that your boss downloaded via peer-to-peer, simply because, its not illegal to download files of any type over a peer-to-peer network. What is illegal however, is to knowingly share copyrighted files out over the Internet, and/or, to knowingly download copyrighted files that you do not own. In this situation, burning the CD of the files for the boss is not an example of either scenario.

      The other points you make are correct though. The main difference is that the OP is being told to do something that is knowingly illegal. As the IT person in the company, he/she knows how many licenses the business legally owns. Now that person is being explicity told to install additional seats of said software, without purchasing additional licenses to cover those seats. In your example, however, how is the IT person to know what music the boss may or may not already own? Only if all file sharing over p2p networks were illegal would your example be valid.
    69. Re:Just watch your back by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      punitive damage compensation in the US can reach interesting figures

      Isn't that the case with any kind of lawsuit in the US? When I lived in the states my parents were told not to get as much 3rd party liability as they would in Canada on their car insurance as they would just be sued for more.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    70. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I worked as an IT manager in a Government Agency... My section manager insisted in using unlicensed software. I refused, and lost my job. At least I have a better job now, but it was a bitter experience. Mind you, I would do it all again instead of just giving in.

    71. Re:Just watch your back by jhylkema · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My contract and enlistment oath says I swore to "obey all LAWFUL orders", and they're quite quick to fry anybody woh does something illegal with the cop-out "but I was ordered to...."

      Think so, huh? Wonder what 1LT Ehren Watada has to say about that.

      Besides, the Nuremberg Doctrine is a shining example of victor's (so-called) justice. The Allies knew right, good and well that "but I was refusing an illegal order" would have gotten nowhere. "That's nice, private. Would you like a blindfold? A cigarette? Do you have any last words?" Watada's situation is proof positive of that.

      I have karma to burn, so fire away, wingnut mods.

    72. Re:Just watch your back by GovCheese · · Score: 1

      If you object and your employer explains that "information just wants to be free" then all your dissenting arguments have been obviously trumped and there is no point in further discussion. If he uses the term "evil", then immediately return to your cubicle to re-examine your moral cred.

      --
      "He's using a quantum encryption scheme! That'll take hours to break!"
    73. Re:Just watch your back by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      That's not true. See Nuremburg Tribunal vs Göring, Hess, various Johan Hirschkuhs 1945, and related cases.

      Oh wait. Carry on.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    74. Re:Just watch your back by qnxdude · · Score: 0

      Well i did go to 3 lawyers, one of which specialized in employment law. I didn't go for the freebie session paying for my time in full each time, and the consensus was unanimous. A company in BC can dismiss an employee without giving any reason. all they have to do is pay severance of 2 weeks or give 2 weeks notice. Unless i got it in writing that the reason i was being dismissed was because i requested family leave, its pretty much impossible to prove. These were the words of the person i called at the BC human rights counsel. Yes its against the law, but the law is unenforceable.

      The laptop, well yes that did suck. They were saying that because one of my skills is cryptography (I was hired to work on an encrypted 2 way radio project), that i could be hiding company secrets in my laptop, and there would be no way of telling. It was obvious that they were just trying to screw me around because the only reason the laptop came in the building was because i didn't want to leave it in the car for someone to steal. It never even came out of its case let alone powered up.
      I had a recent backup of the laptop, so the path of least resistance was to simply let them wipe the drive, otherwise it would probably still be winding its way through the courts, and i would still be out a laptop and a large pile of cash for lawyers.

      What i didn't mention, which is the best part of this story, is that a week later after i got my laptop back and restored my resume from backup, i walked over to their competition. Had a chat with the president of that company, told him exactly what happened, and was hired on the spot at 2 times what company "A" was paying me. Plus a much more flexible and family friendly work environment.
      Things became hilarious when later company a tried to sue my new employers for stealing me away. The judge tossed them out on their a$$ (with prejudice)after listening to the story for about 5 minutes.

      So in the end it worked out. I'm working for a much better company, and they treat me like gold. Plus i have much more time to spend with my daughter. but lesson learned, there is no job security in BC unless you are in a union. period..

    75. Re:Just watch your back by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I think killing enemy soldiers is basically legal when the war is on.

      I dunno, it's a strange area. I was watching Band of Brothers last night, and in one of last episodes when the war is over they go to Austria and kill the commandant of one of the concentration camps they liberated during the war. I guess that if they'd killed him whilst liberating the camp in war time it would be legal, but post war it was more murky. Which makes you wonder if killing German soldiers becomes illegal at the instant of German surrender, or when the treaty is signed or what.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    76. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never worked for someone that would be stupid enough to fire you for refusing to break the law. They'd pull your internet usage, printer usage, phone records, and bust your ass for every little thing that might be potentially deemed non-team-player work. When it comes firing time, they'll have a nice long laundry list of little reasons they're getting rid of you. I'm ashamed to say it, and I'd never do it again, but I've been complicit in this process before.

      They know how to cover their asses, that's why they're still in business.

    77. Re:Just watch your back by romango · · Score: 1

      I inherited a department with a long legacy of pirated copies. I undertook a careful survey of unlicensed versions, with help from members of my department. Our intent was to fix the problem. Unfortunately, one of my folks was pissed at the CEO (for vague reasons) and turned our list over to the software police before we could act on it. Cost the company 75K (we got off cheap by totally rolling over). Just goes to show: if there is shit near the fan ... Assume this will happen to you.

    78. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly I just watched the last episodes of season 4 on DVD. and what.. it is now 2007? oh man.. I am sooo nostalgic.

    79. Re:Just watch your back by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Refuse, and then report them. I just spent a half-semester doing research on this topic for my brief writing class. There is a narrow public policy exception (supported by legislative or constitutional wording) in most states that says an employer may not retaliatorily terminate you when you refuse to break the law. If they do fire you, the typical procedure for most courts (definitely for Wisconsin, since I did the research within that state's common law, and I didn't find any state that was absolutely opposed to what I'm saying) you go to court, give the court the public policy you were commanded to violate (in this case, the legislative imperative that stealing is illegal, that you were given the ultimatum of "install the software w/o the licenses or you're fired," and you're done. Instant metric assload of money is yours, provided you got a decent lawyer. I didn't do much research into the amount of damages you'd recover, but most cases I vaguely recall involved salary payments among other things. One employer was even forced to rehire his employee, and the employee got back-salary, I think.

      However, I'm not a lawyer yet, so don't take this as legal advice. You can talk to a lawyer about this; an initial consultation might even be free. See what lawyers in your state have to say about the issue. You could even go to a library at your nearest law school and look up in your state's case history the topic of "retaliatory discharge," if you wanted to avoid paying for legal services just yet.

      I just wanted to let you know that there are provisions protecting employees in the situation of facing the choice of "violate the law or be fired."

    80. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in the IT section for the US Gov. In fact, the guy sitting across from me is the No Fun Guy (as we call him) that scans the network and finds all the crap that people install.

      You got fired because you didn't go up the chain of command. You got fired because you probably handled it wrong.

    81. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simple: Bring your lawyer in on a meeting. Refuse to do anything that is illegal with your lawyer present.

      If they get somebody else to do it, fine - not your problem. If they punish you for not doing it (i.e. letting you go), sue them for punishing you for refusing to obey an illegal demand. They will rather settle, than go in front of a jury AND risk attracting unwanted attention from BSA and the likes.

    82. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are in the military, you should know that the moment the surrender is accepted the rules of engagement change and you can't "shoot first" anymore.

      You can still shoot in self-defence in case some of the enemy hasn't been notified of the surrender or they (maybe) don't feel like it, but all offensive operations are terminated or put on hold. If you're in the middle of an engagement you have authorization to continue it until the objective is achieved, or you can risk and notify the opponent that the war is over and they shouldn't lose their lives uselessly.

      But you can't go and kill an enemy on purpose if they have surrendered. And you can't go and make up your mission to take out a guy, even if he deserves it. But definitely, if I had been in Easy Company's shoes, I would have slotted the mofo right in the gullet.

    83. Re:Just watch your back by rgravina · · Score: 2, Informative

      It comes from Babylon 5. Sheridan was ordered to fire on civilain ships by a corrupt government, and he disobeyed the order - and encouraged others to do so - feeling that it was his duty to do what he felt was right, not what he was told.

    84. Re:Just watch your back by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      The magic bullet to get Ms-Office out of the window is to define a corporate policy document which says that the standard document format of the cooperation should be ISO 26300 conform plus other standard stuff, naming convention etc. Then you start a process of standard compliance checks and link it with your corporate quality management...

    85. Re:Just watch your back by fuliginous · · Score: 1

      It's your obligation and civic duty to not break the law and

      You are only required as an employee to follow legal (and not wholly unreasonable) orders.

      So same end result. But the thing I'm trying to highlight is that clearly if you have no obligation to follow an illegal order and yet you do you have in affect I would argue acted independently. I've made myself interested in the fine point of that now in actual case law.

    86. Re:Just watch your back by IkeTo · · Score: 1

      > why would he have to quit? Just don't do it. What is the worst that can happen? they fire you?

      I'd agree, and would add: "and do as good as reasonably possible for every (other) legal and reasonable thing they ask you to do". There is a cost associated to your company firing anybody, including you. Add it to the value that you give to the company, it won't do so just because you refuse to do one of the many things they want you to do. It will instead resolve their problem in another way, whether it find somebody else to do it, or it follows your suggestion to do something else. Things do not always go to the legal department.

      On the other hand, if most of the things you're asked to do involve illegal work, you should quit. Not just for moral reasons, but also because there is real danger that your company collapses in front of you, and you want to exit the company before that happens.

    87. Re:Just watch your back by DeanOh · · Score: 1

      The OP never indicated he (or she) worked for the government, did he (she) ??

    88. Re:Just watch your back by DeanOh · · Score: 1

      What? The OP is being asked to install unlicensed software, not commit war crimes.

      But: if this is the management's approach to a no-brainer legal/ethical issue, it should send up many red flags about how they are acting in other areas. Document your objects, do the install, and start your new job search immediately, because my confidence in how they are managing finances and plan to treat their employees over the long term would be absolutely zero.

    89. Re:Just watch your back by Unnamed+Chickenheart · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, it for sure wasn't me!

      --
      urd
    90. Re:Just watch your back by Ep0xi · · Score: 0

      i would not watch my back nor use illegal soft because i know the every consecuense you might ask and now i have a family to care of which is great because either way i dont own a damn computer

      --
      ?
    91. Re:Just watch your back by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The killing of enemy soldiers for sport or revenge is illegal, in war soldiers on the opposing side must be given reasonable opportunities to surrender both as individual and in group, and once they've surrendered, their health, welfare and safety is the responsibility of the capturing side. The "commandant" should have been run-down, taken into custody, and allowed to defend his actions before a court.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    92. Re:Just watch your back by kria · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I work at a government contractor, and the idea of downloading and installing software of even questionable legality was one of the examples of what not to do in one of our Ethics Training sessions. (Basically some weird stuff with software looking free and then having stuff hidden in the EULA showing that it's not. Or something bizarre like that.) And in the case you're talking about, it's not questionable, you KNOW it's unlicensed! Wow!

      I would get some of these directions in email, and start moving up the chain.

    93. Re:Just watch your back by Zonekeeper · · Score: 0

      Thats it. Hand in your Geek(tm) membership card at the door on your way out. Buh-bye.

    94. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a terrible analogy (to B5). And it reminds me of what my reaction to a similar order might be, by asking the person who ordered it a simple and legitimate question:

      Did you get approval from your boss to install this unlicensed software?

      [i.e. did the order follow the *chain of command*, or is it on the sole initiative of your boss?]

      This isn't going over their head, or anything like that. It is just asking them whether it's being done on their own authority or if they (like you) are being ordered to do it. Maybe you're both in the same boat.

      If "no", hopefully that would make the person consider whether they really had the authority to order you to do what they've instructed, and if they were really willing to take responsibility for what is an illegal act. Maybe they'll reconsider. You could ask them to ask their boss if it is okay (following channels). If there's a good boss up there, they'll do the right thing. And if the answer was "yes", their boss told them to tell you to do it, personally, I'd make arrangements to get out of there as soon as practical, because it means the corruption runs higher up, and it is only a matter of time before something much worse happens, and they might ask you to do it.

      Some people have suggested going straight above your immediate boss's head to someone higher up. That's unnecessarily provocative. Send a written memo to your immediate boss with the question, and see what happens from there.

      If things do go bad, seek the advice of a lawyer with documentation in hand, and certainly before doing anything illegal (i.e. quite probably NOW).

    95. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #2 is closer, at least for small/medium businesses.

      Also, in a small / medium business, it's easier to say "No" (repeatedly) when asked to install software on multiple machines. Of course, I have the advantage of being the top-dog tech person at the firm. And for people who don't get the concept, explaining that infractions will cost a few thousand per copy makes licensing look inexpensive.

      All of this is also why we're doing as much as possible to use open-source or other software where I don't have to track licenses. I don't mind paying for per-incident support, I just hate having to track and purchase licenses all the time. Every time I manage to switch a particular package over to open-source software, I reduce my administrative workload.

    96. Re:Just watch your back by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      OTOH, an annoyed ex-employee could make life pretty miserable for you by tipping off the software police. Even if you are a smaller fish.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    97. Re:Just watch your back by JhohannaVH · · Score: 2

      ***applause***

      Damnit... this seriously needs to be brought back on television. UniversalHD has a glut of programming repetition, it would be a perfect fit!

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    98. Re:Just watch your back by coredog64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Watada doesn't have the standing to question the legality of his order. It would be a different kettle of fish if it was someone on the JCS. If Watada had been ordered to gun down 27 unarmed teenagers and then bulldoze their bodies into a grave, then yeah, he's got a leg to stand on.

    99. Re:Just watch your back by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      As an employee, your employer is responsible for your actions. If you have a legal concern about what you are doing then put it in writing and save a copy. You've done your due diligence. Once that is done, it is up to your management whether or not they do the right thing.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    100. Re:Just watch your back by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It is up to a certain point. That point changes with rank. The higher your rank, the less likely that excuse will get you out of trouble. Certain parts of the chain of command are expected to think for themselves and lead other men. THESE are the people that usually have to worry about war tribunals.

      Do you fancy yourself a General or a Colonel?

      Do you understand those terms well enough to even make the judgement?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    101. Re:Just watch your back by bemenaker · · Score: 1

      During my years of consulting, I often ran into this problem myself. In order to survive, (self-employment can be perilous at first), often I had to walk that line. Whenever I could not get the owner to buy the software, I noted it on the invoice. I would always put in there what I installed, how many copies, that I had talked with the owner about it, and that they knew that they were not in license compliance. I had informed them, and that they had told me they were seeking to buy the licenses. Then I had them sign it.

      That way, I had broken the license technically, but I was doing it in good faith that the owner was intending to purchase the licenses in the near future. And I kept the version with ink on it, and photocopied a signed copy for their records.

      I don't know how much shielding this gave me, but at least I was showing attempt to retain legality while still eating.

    102. Re:Just watch your back by Naruki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, Anonymous Coward, if that is your real name...

      Why did you criticize his actions but, from your wealth of superior knowledge, refuse to offer the correct procedure for this person to follow?

    103. Re:Just watch your back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's no such thing as "corporate immunity."

      Corporations have liability shields which protect the stock holders and officers from being personally sued for actions of the corporations. That is, while you can sue the company, you can't sue the CEO. But "immunity"? No.

      We created corporations decades ago to enable large, dangerous projects such as, oh, say the Golden Gate Bridge. Which everybody knew would mean disabling accidents and even death to some percentage of the workers no matter what was done in terms of safety. The project is inherently risky. Before the creation of the corporation, investors were personally liable. They would have been risking everything right down to their house by getting involved in a project such as the Golden Gate. So states began creating fictional "beings" to be liable but shielding the investors and officers from personal liability. Otherwise, nobody would touch the project. Too risky.

      We overuse the concept these days and shield everybody from everything which is creating some real monsters out there. Even Abraham Lincoln, a good century and a half ago, warned that if we weren't careful, we'd create unaccountable organizations that would overpower our government (for details, see Washington DC circa 2007). But the basic idea makes sense if kept under control.

      As in we wouldn't get the big, risky projects like bridges and tunnels and experimental drugs and such if investors were putting their personal wealth and property on the line every time. I ain't buying stock in a company doing something risky like experimental medical treatments if somebody could sue and take my house. Would you?

      But immunity? No. Or haven't you noticed that corporate officers and employees actually do go to jail? Many of the Enron bunch are serving or facing jail time. Ken Lay was sentenced (but then curiously keeled over of "natural causes" before actually being locked up). Even Martha Stuart was in jail. Or did you miss that?

      "My boss made me" is not a legal defense. "I was just following orders" doesn't do anybody any good in a court. Yes you are legally liable if you commit an illegal act at the order of your boss. Under our system, your response is supposed to be, "That's illegal, I won't do it."

      Or do you think we live in a system where the CEO of a company can order you to assassinate the CEO of the competition and you'll get off because, "The CEO made me do it"?

      Well, I got news for ya...

    104. Re:Just watch your back by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

      Actually it came from the US Military. I was told that when I joined the army in 1987. So sorry try again.

    105. Re:Just watch your back by superbus1929 · · Score: 1

      Didn't work for Bormann.

      --
      Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
    106. Re:Just watch your back by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      When I was ORDERED to do something VERY illegal (and I worked with COMSEC and two person rule stuff) in the Army, I refused until I had the order in writing, signed by the officer making the order and countersigned by the unit commander.

      The Lt dimwit repeated the order, or be courtmartialed, and I threatened to pick up the secure phone and let the Colonel know what she was doing (by this time I was holding my loaded weapon. I WAS NOT going to jail for the bee-otch).

      She left the secure room and I never heard boo about the subject again...

    107. Re:Just watch your back by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I would suggest Legal department/counsel, if your company has one, is where you should be going if you are concerned with legal ramifications -- that's their job, they are the ones paid to determine what is and isn't the best legal way to proceed.

      Remember, the legal department's job is to protect the company, not you.

      Talk t a lawyer; but be sure it is your lawyer - get help from one familiar with employment law.

      Also, I'd echo the sentiments of others - start looking for a new job.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    108. Re:Just watch your back by Tree131 · · Score: 1

      Martha Stewart was in jail for insider trading. She wasn't in jail for creative accounting or misuse of corporate funds.

    109. Re:Just watch your back by rhombic · · Score: 1

      Wow, I hope if you ever get charged with anything, you've got a better lawyer than yourself. If you know or should have known that an action is illegal, you're personally responsible to not take that action. If you put it in writing and save a copy, you remove all possibility of using the defense that you didn't know your actions were illegal. Yes, your employer is going to bear the brunt of any civil case, mainly because they've got more money than you do. But if the BSA finds your little note about "I know this is illegal, so I'm gonna install this software under duress", you're going down in a blaze of glory. Have fun with that, now.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    110. Re:Just watch your back by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      If Watada had been ordered to gun down 27 unarmed teenagers and then bulldoze their bodies into a grave, then yeah, he's got a leg to stand on.

      But you and I both know that the odds are about 100% that if he goes, he eventually will be ordered to do something along those lines. Or just pick them up and haul them off to concentration, erm, "detention" camps to be tortured, erm, interrogated with "enhanced interrogation methods."

    111. Re:Just watch your back by mikesmind · · Score: 1

      I had a similar directive at a past job. The company president told me to install Windows 3.1 or he would do it. His logic was that the company purchased one copy, and since it was so expensive, we should be able to put it on as many PCs as we wanted. Needless to say, I found another job.

      You can't go wrong by doing the right thing. You may suffer in the short term, but in the long term things work out for the better. That's how it worked for me.

      --
      www.mikesmind.com - www.daddyworkathome.com - www.freetofarm.org - www.tenfoottable.com
    112. Re:Just watch your back by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Ok, fine.

      Give us some nice examples.

      While you're at it you could give us an example of ANYONE ever being criminally charged over installing pirated business software, including but not limited to actual managers or even CxO level employees.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    113. Re:Just watch your back by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother! Get your arse out of there, STAT!

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
  2. Ask Slashdot: How do I act on principle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dear Slashdot, I have a set of principles that I adhere to rigorously. Today, I have been presented with something that violates my principles. What should I do?

    Answer, you have a choice: Grow some balls or a spine. Really, either will do.

  3. Blow the whistle or quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The minute you install the pirated software, you have no moral leg to stand on. You either stick to your guns or you leave. The "I did it because it was my job to do it" defense has been tried (literally) and failed.

    1. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by mattatwork · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You mean the good ol' Nuremberg defense ( "Befehl ist Befehl" or "only following orders").... Very few who used that defense survived the trials and those that did claimed that if they didn't follow orders they would have been killed.... I doubt that's what the case here is.... Typically if you want to blow the whistle, you have to do so before committing the questionable/illegal act to maintain any kind of credibility. I say delay installing the software and look for another job. Turning them in may be a major headache depending on how your company handles human resource related issues and how your superiors handle subordinates going above them in the chain of command to point out their improper act(s)/behavior/orders....

      --
      I've refrained from profanity, racial/ethnic epitaphs and am 5'11" - how can I be ranked as troll?
    2. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by QuantumRiff · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And when you file for unemployment, and they deny your claim at first because your left voluntarily, and then you file paperwork in response that you left under duress after being ordered by a superior to do something against the law, stuff gets interesting!

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    3. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by tubapro12 · · Score: 1

      And it should be obvious why. If it could pass with that excuse it could easily provide a cover for various other illegal operations: they would just need to operate as a business to get protection, obviously not how it works.

    4. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nothing at all will happen to the employer as a result of a statement in the unemployment file concerning illegal or unethical pressures. This is usually written off as "disgruntled employee" and it goes no further. Your options here are really all or nothing. Go to the authorities or be a part of it.

    5. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Befehl ist Befehl" or "only following orders"

      I don't speak any German, but doesn't that literally mean "Orders are orders"? Anyway, I don't believe in turning people in for property crimes given their vengeful nature on both sides of the law, and I wouldn't want to put myself in the line of fire, having to testify, have my personal things torn up, possibly losing my own computer at home even, for "discovery", etc. And even more so, I don't want to be labeled as a snitch. I would be completely untrustworthy in the future, and rightfully so. Don't do anything that can be traced back to you. Look for another job, and maybe don't use that particular employer as a reference. They might get caught, and something could lead back to you, even if they are outright lies. Our system has turned honesty into a liability. When dealing with the authorities, always do so anonymously.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by Rufty · · Score: 1

      That doesn't seem to apply any more...

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    7. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      It's usually not worth the effort to turn them in - at best it makes you a whistleblower and might make other companies nervous about hiring you. At worst, the ensuing legal battles could keep you in court for years. Sure, you could probably launch some lawsuits of your own, but what do you do in the meantime?

      Make your refusal in writing - it carries more weight (figuratively, literally, and legally) than email. If they still push, take vacation - unpaid if you have to - and start that job search.

    8. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by Trickster+Paean · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but... Depending on the state, if you do say that they were asking you to do something illegal, your claim unemployment benefit may be upheld. The burden may be on the employer to prove that you should not get unemployment benefits.

    9. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing at all will happen to the employer as a result of a statement in the unemployment file concerning illegal or unethical pressures. This is usually written off as "disgruntled employee" and it goes no further. Your options here are really all or nothing. Go to the authorities or be a part of it.

      This is why god invented cameraa phones that record sound and video ... mine only records half a minute of sound, but 5 minutes of video and sound, so I'd just record a video and not worry about where the camera's pointing.

      Or buy a tape recorder - they're good for an hour or two at a time.

    10. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ACHTUNG: Offtopic linguistic explanation ahead.


      "Befehl ist befehl" is literally probably closest to "instruction is instruction" -- but yes, the gist is "orders are orders" or "commands are commands."


      The only reason some (*cough*Wikipedia*cough*) define it as "only following orders" is because that's what it means, in English and in German. When someone says "eh, orders are orders," you understand this to mean they don't agree or would rather not do the task at hand, but they have no choice.

    11. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I would be completely untrustworthy in the future, and rightfully so."

      You would not be rightfully untrustworthy, but unrightfully untrusted: They believe that you betrayed them personally, thus that you cannot be trusted, because they expect of you personal loyality; but in reality you followed the law, thus you only will tell on them if they violate the law, being loyal to society as a whole. If you didn't, that would mean you are untrustworthy to everyone except to your employer when he does illegal things and not even then, because if you haven't a problem with breaking the law, why not add blackmail to it?

    12. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      That's silly. You refuse, and stand your ground. They either relent or fire you. You don't say "do this or I quit" - you're right, that puts you in a bad spot with unemployment.

      --
      -Styopa
    13. Re:Blow the whistle or quit by AusIV · · Score: 1

      The minute you install the pirated software, you have no moral leg to stand on. You either stick to your guns or you leave. The "I did it because it was my job to do it" defense has been tried (literally) and failed.

      You may have no legal leg to stand on, but moral? Come on. It's one thing for a young, single, bottom of the pay scale worker to be able to quit and go find another job. But it's not so easy when you've got a family and have to put food on the table, and you've been around a company that starting over would take several months and would set you back several grand a year. It may be a moral dilemma, but personally I'd think less of a man who couldn't pay his rent or keep food on the table than one who installed some pirated software because his boss told him to.

      This guy definitely needs to cover his ass to make sure that if the company gets in trouble, he's not going to be the fall guy, but to say he should quit his job over something like this isn't looking at the big picture.

  4. Turn them in by doubleofive · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Software piracy is wrong, especially on a corporate scale. I'd write to the higher-ups explaining the options (either going legit with MS or OpenOffice), and if they wouldn't listen I would quit. But that's just me. I hate dirty pirates.

    --
    Your tongues can't repel flavor of that magnitude!
    1. Re:Turn them in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Especially when they don't share the grog

    2. Re:Turn them in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last card is still valid. Just that you are equating "not theft" with "lesser a crime than theft".

    3. Re:Turn them in by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "it's not theft, it's copyright infringement"
      it's not a card, it's a fact.
      It's still a crime, just not theft.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Turn them in by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      He's gotten as high as the comptroller's office who said to install the pirated Office. You can go higher still, but who's going to care and who actually understands the exposure to liability from a BSA audit? General Counsel? CIO? Those two should understand the legal and IT side of this issue. If they don't care, you're obviously dealing with a clue-deprived organization. Document this (on paper too) and don't be the fall guy.

  5. well, by joe+155 · · Score: 1

    you could leave and turn them in... but that would really mess up your chances of getting a job anywhere again. you should get your objection in writing to cover your ass and then do it - if it all goes to shit then roll over on the people who over ruled you.

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:well, by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Oh, please. How would this mess up his chances at getting another job? IT isn't some small industry where everyone knows everyone. It's not like he needs his former boss as a reference. Just a good resume, and a few good references (coworkers) is all you need to get a job.

    2. Re:well, by twitter · · Score: 1

      get your objection in writing to cover your ass

      Like his boss is going to sign something like that or own up to it later. Forget it, he needs to leave.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    3. Re:well, by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      The request for instructions in writing is part of the process of demonstrating to them how serious the infraction is. If the boss doesn't issue the instruction he knows it won't be done, and if it does he knows he's probably going to have perjure himself in court over it. Believe it or not, but people do think twice about compounding their offenses by committing perjury on top of them.

      Please shut up about things you don't know anything about.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:well, by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      You would be surprised at how small a world it can be - especially if the OP goes looking for another job in the same industry, or geographical area.

      Unfortunately, it's also been my experience that many places WILL call your former employer - even if you explictly tell them not to.

    5. Re:well, by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I can't say I've had that experience; in fact, with my last company, it'd be pretty hard to know who to call when the company has 100,000 employees.

      Also, if an ex-employer bad-mouths you, that's grounds for a lawsuit which would be an easy win. Any smart employer now will not say anything at all about you except to confirm you worked there, and during what dates. This is standard company policy now at most places.

      If it comes down to a decision between worrying about your employer bad-mouthing you to future employers, and breaking the law and making yourself liable for it should the BSA find out, I think the choice should be pretty simple.

    6. Re:well, by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Also, if an ex-employer bad-mouths you, that's grounds for a lawsuit which would be an easy win. Any smart employer now will not say anything at all about you except to confirm you worked there, and during what dates. This is standard company policy now at most places.

      HR people are the only ones that care about those policies. The real first-line people in the trenches and lower to middle managers will still give references, but only good ones. The ones that don't have anything good to say about a former employee refer the reference checker to HR. And with a wink and a nod, the reference checker knows what that means--people aren't afraid to say good things about a former employee, but are afraid to say bad things, thus the HR referral.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    7. Re:well, by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But you still have to think, why would someone be looking for a new job if their old company was so great? Yeah, if they're moving from a different city for family reasons or whatever, that's pretty obvious. But employers are always struggling to find new people, even if they already live in the area, which means that they're leaving one local company. So unless they're being fired outright, they're probably leaving because they're unhappy.

      So if you're looking for an employee, and don't want anyone that didn't like their former employer for any reason, that means the only people you can hire are fresh out of school. Anyone with any experience (which is what all the employers want these days, not fresh-outs) is off-limits.

    8. Re:well, by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      My first thought is "higher salary." I've seen people leave where I am who were happy and productive but went after the bigger bucks. But you do raise good points--and note that many companies very much prefer new hires from school to people that have spent time in some other company's culture.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    9. Re:well, by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'd say they probably weren't that happy if they thought they were being underpaid, which is the primary reason why people go after "the bigger bucks".

      What I've seen, over and over, is that staying at a single employer leads you to salary stagnation. Once the company gets a good employee in, they give them petty little cost-of-living raises, or maybe slightly better, unless they're some kind of superstar or really good at working the system. By contrast, when that some company needs to fill positions, they'll offer "market rate", which has gone up faster than their internal raise structure. So someone new (but with experience from another company) will be earning more money than someone who's stuck with the company their whole career. In the end, this means you need to switch jobs every few years to keep your salary up, because companies are gambling that you'll be too lazy or complacent to change jobs and they can save money that way.

      I've seen the exact same thing with apartments. If you stay in the same apartment complex and are a good tenant, they'll jack up your rent every year because they know you don't want to go to the trouble and expense of moving. But to fill empty apartments, they'll offer new prospective residents very low rent. Effectively, you're punished for being loyal and reliable.

      As for prefering new hires, I don't see that at all in today's business climate. For technical positions, companies no longer want to train anyone, so they only want people with experience. They want people who are already experts and get "hit the ground running". Of course, this goes right back to my first point about them refusing to give substantial raises to people who stick around, so because of this they never develop much in-house talent.

      Personally, I'm not sure how long American companies can go on being so shortsighted with their HR practices. This is going to come back to bite them all in the ass sooner or later.

    10. Re:well, by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Well, I've worked at a lot of startups and small companies.

      I thought I had done well on one interview, and even the recruiter thought I would be getting a job offer soon. Then he called back and said that one of my references didn't say good things about me. Later, it turned out that they didn't even use my references, but called my previous employer even though I had explicitly said not to.

      The company refused to disclose what had been said, or even who they had talked to - claiming privacy issues (wtf?!?) The recruiter was pretty upset with the company as well, but without any actual evidence the only thing we could do was to just continue my job search.

      The thing I don't understand about this whole thing is that it's always the HR department that wants professional references - preferably your former coworkers or managers. However, as pointed out, most companies have a strict "no references" policies. These HR departments know that - they probably have a similar policy at their own company. Yet they have no problems asking OTHERS to break their company's policy. Very hypocritical.

    11. Re:well, by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      One word: Layoffs.

      At one place, I was doing well, and had just gotten a good raise. Then we found out the company missed its sales numbers for the second quarter in a row and 2 weeks later, my boss is telling me I've been laid off.

    12. Re:well, by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it'd be worth it to have a lawyer draft a letter to your former employer, threatening to sue for slander, citing your lost opportunity. After all, if there were a trial, the people at the company that refused you could be subpoenaed and forced to testify under oath.

      Not that you'd want to take this to trial, but for a small fee to the lawyer to draft and send the letter, you might be able to get a nice settlement from your former employer.

    13. Re:well, by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's true, there are people who experience lay-offs. But when the economy is good, that's a very small number, and certainly not enough to supply the hiring needs for all the companies that need more employees. The only way they're going to get the people they need (with the experience they want, since they don't want to train fresh-outs) is to poach them from other companies. This means there's going to be a bunch who weren't happy with their previous employers for some reason.

    14. Re:well, by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      I won't argue with you about stagnation -- it's conventional wisdom that the only way to get a large increase in salary is to change jobs. I have been lucky with apartments, though--maybe it's because mine's so sparsely furnished that the management realizes that rent increase = 1 month's notice :).

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  6. Which is the lesser of two evils? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You have to chose between the lesser of two evils. Go against your bosses wishes, or go against the law.

    To me, the decision is clear-cut.

    1. Re:Which is the lesser of two evils? by arivanov · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which country?

      Western Europe, USA, Japan - decision is indeed clear cut as they will blame you for it anyway. It is solely a question of who does it first.

      Eastern Europe, Russia, China - you have a WHOLE ONE LEGAL COPY OF OFFICE? Who is the out of his mind person to buy it.

      So it is all relative... Same as Microsoft policy to enforcing piracy. I have seen them turn a blind eye too many once you get far enough east. After all, as with all crack dealers - the first dose of is free.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Which is the lesser of two evils? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at home everything is paid for?

      Don't think management uses every dirty business trick they know?

      If the software makers thought they needed all the extra revenue they would make it so much harder to run pirated copies wouldn't they?

    3. Re:Which is the lesser of two evils? by Magic+Fingers · · Score: 0

      Which company?

    4. Re:Which is the lesser of two evils? by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      They may not enforce their license to individual pirates, but a whole company? It doesn't matter what country they are based in, a company has a lot of capital to be gained from lawsuits.

      You mention crack dealers, believe it or not, they eventually do charge once you get addicted and really need it. In the software side of this analogy, a business is analogous to an addict. They are the ones who really need the software.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    5. Re:Which is the lesser of two evils? by mswope · · Score: 1

      This is probably indicative of other "problems" at this company, too. If they're willing to violate licensing on software, what else are they willing to do? Plagiarize on published works? Cheat on their taxes? Skim a little off the top of the profit-sharing pie?

      There is no middle ground to stand on here; you know it's wrong, you've told them that it's wrong (and hopefully documented it). You can refuse to do what's wrong or you can agree to do what's wrong.

      If they're going to force you to do what's wrong, or fire you for doing the Right Thing(tm), do you *really* want to work there?

    6. Re:Which is the lesser of two evils? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Installing Microsoft products may have a similar effect on your health though.

      The effect of the addiction comes when more trade ties are established between east and west and anything you write strengthens the need for Microsoft wherever you are.

    7. Re:Which is the lesser of two evils? by quintesse · · Score: 1

      Western Europe? You must be kidding. In all the companies I worked for both in The Netherlands and in Spain illegal copies were common. Some of it was blatant: "just find a key somewhere" (which seems to happen often enough at my current job in Telefonica, Spain's largest Telecom Operator) some if it was more like "we don't know how many licenses we have exactly".

      I don't know what the law actually says over here but these things never come to any kind of trial. When these kind of violations are found (by a watchdog organization for example) the company gets sent a letter and the company pays up. Companies want the problem to go away as quietly as possible and they know that pointing fingers will normally just make things worse.

  7. Well, I don't use it personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but on a shared workstation I sometimes use there is a "demo" of a rather popular multimedia creation app installed. Except when you open it up it acts just like the full version... ...and on a network share there are a few scene releases of shareware type programs.

  8. Stop Being a Tool... by morari · · Score: 0

    You personally are not saving money, so why take the risk for company big wigs?

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  9. Professional by 26199 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any actual profession... and as much as IT/programming may claim to be one, it isn't really one yet... has a code of conduct that says quite clearly what you need to do. You can't be a professional and knowingly support illegal activity.

    1. Re:Professional by Threni · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Your comments about programming not being a profession I find a little bizarre, but I can't say I'm too bothered about it. I have to take issue with the following, though:

      > You can't be a professional and knowingly support illegal activity.

      I'm a professional software engineer and I support the production, sale and consumption of cannabis. I understand that I'm pretty far from being alone in this way of thinking. I put it to you that you're wrong.

      I don't agree that companies should routinely and knowingly use unlicensed (a slightly better word than the absurd `pirate`) software, although sometimes it's a little confusing so I can imagine some companies unwillingly using software on more computers than they should.

    2. Re:Professional by sconeu · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean like the ACM Code of Ethics?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Professional by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 2, Informative

      IT professionals have a very reasonable code of ethics, thank you very much.

      http://lopsa.org/CodeOfEthics

    4. Re:Professional by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the idea is a true professional doesn't support illegal activity on the jobsite, or related to his career. Cannabis has nothing at all to do with software engineering, just like vacation travel to Cuba (also stupidly illegal) has nothing to do with software engineering. Stances on political issues (which these are) really have no bearing on your profession. Knowingly violating copyrights and licenses, however, has a direct bearing on your profession, and is not something a good professional would do (regardless of his feelings on the issue). This doesn't mean he couldn't be against the current copyright laws, and write to his political representatives in order to have the laws changed, but while those laws are in force, he needs to abide by them in the course of his professional duties.

    5. Re:Professional by 26199 · · Score: 1

      What you believe is your own business -- I mean actively support as in, be an accomplice to. I certainly wouldn't claim to be a professional if I was openly breaking the law.

      I'm also a "professional" software engineer, but I don't honestly think I've earned the title yet... to me professional means being held to impeccable standards of conduct, and I'm not entirely sure I make the cut.

    6. Re:Professional by Threni · · Score: 1

      > This doesn't mean he couldn't be against the current copyright laws, and write to his political
      > representatives in order to have the laws changed, but while those laws are in force, he needs to
      > abide by them in the course of his professional duties.

      It might be a good idea in terms of avoiding fines/prison to obey copyright law, but I don't think that when you talk about being professional you have to suddenly assume `legality = morality`. I see nothing `professionally` wrong with refusing to recognize software patents if it makes a solution to a technical problem easier or more elegant than either licensing the IP or coding around it. Perhaps you see that as different to breaking copyright laws, though, and categorize it as `political`. There doesn't seem to me to be much difference between using someone else's code and coding someone else's algorithms.

    7. Re:Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, when wouldn't stealing someone's patent be easier than licensing it? When you don't risk getting caught? If that's your standard, you are clearly not a professional. I hope you're not exposing your clients to litigation with your careless behaviour.

    8. Re:Professional by Threni · · Score: 1

      > What you believe is your own business -- I mean actively support as in, be an accomplice to. I
      > certainly wouldn't claim to be a professional if I was openly breaking the law.

      Why not? Would you care to elaborate? Many professional musicians use drugs - are they somehow not professionals? What about the millions of teachers, architects, policemen, programmers etc who use drugs? Your case is very weak. Even if those people were doing something morally wrong, such as murder, steal or deliberately hurt people, it still wouldn't have any bearing on whether or not they were good at their jobs. Was Gesualdo any less of a professional musician just because he killed his wife? And if professional is used to mean `makes a living from` rather than `is extremely proficient in`, then would you say that UK author Jeffrey Archer doesn't make his living from writing simply because he's been jailed for perjury?

      > I'm also a "professional" software engineer, but I don't honestly think I've earned the title
      > yet... to me professional means being held to impeccable standards of conduct, and I'm not entirely
      > sure I make the cut.

      If you're trying to do better all the time, train yourself, read up on your subject, can tell good code from bad and try and write good code, then I'd say you're a professional.

    9. Re:Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like vacation travel to Cuba (also stupidly illegal)

      Well, only for USAians. And even then, that's not quite true. There are many legal exceptions, and the ban is not really on visiting, but on enriching Cuba.

    10. Re:Professional by the_wesman · · Score: 1

      What about "The World's Oldest Profession" ??

      --
      calling all destroyers
    11. Re:Professional by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

      He forgot a few :
      I will not be a camper or AWP-whore.
      I will not spawn-kill.
      I will not kill-steal or ninja-loot or intentionally train-to-zone.
      I will immediately delete any porn I find that involves obviously underage participants, and then go wash my eyes out with soap.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    12. Re:Professional by honkycat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's professional in the sense that a professional engineer is obligated to work within the legal environment pertaining to his line of work. For a civil engineer, this means complying with building codes. For a software engineer, it means working within the copyright/patent laws. In both cases, it might be expedient to ignore the rules -- if they only made the engineer's job easier, they wouldn't have to be legislated. Ignoring the rules for expediency is simply unprofessional.

      It is unprofessional even if you have a political or moral reason for the decision. If you can't do a job within the confines of the law, either the job can't be done or the law should be changed. Looking the other way is, again, expedient, but ultimately works to everyone's detriment because the underlying problem never gets fixed.

    13. Re:Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are codes of ethics and conduct in the profession. IEEE's code and ACM's code are out there. They do not specifically address software piracy but both condemn harming property. In this forum, it is often mentioned that this activity is not exactly theft but illicit copying. Nonetheless, I would throw software piracy into the realm of property harm in the context of the code of ethics.

      It sounds like this activity is already rampant. It is less clear if it can be pinned on you or not. Are those involved aware the licensing agreements are being violated? Are they aware of the fines for such things? Are they aware of the implications of getting caught (an IT professional could end a career, a business could go under)?

      There are people who do not care. Some people would consider this the same situation as exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour. Some feel that the prices are unreasonably high for the product and choose this as a mild practice of civil disobedience.

      I do not want to sugar coat your situation, though. The IEEE regularly reports that a whistleblower is screwed. Despite all the laws and rules put into place to protect such a person, the career could end. The company may stop providing advancement and raises. The company may provide very negative references. The company may even engage in unlawful termination activity. All of this, however, is difficult to prove in court. The result would be large legal bills and no income. Read more about it:
      The whistle-blower's dilemma
      Kumagai, J.
      Spectrum, IEEE
      Volume 41, Issue 4, April 2004 Page(s): 53 - 55

      Your most pragmatic approach may be to get a new job and report them to something like BSA later. That may sound like a case of sour grapes, but there are no perfect solutions.

      Good luck with your choice: it is a matter of selecting imperfect solutions in an imperfect world.

      PS: Your work computer belongs to the company. They may already be monitoring you. As a member of IT, you may be more aware of the monitoring than others. Keep it in mind, however, because secrecy and anonymity tend to be important in these matters.

    14. Re:Professional by 26199 · · Score: 1

      Your use of the word "professional" is clearly different from mine.

      I do not think this is valid justification for an argument ;)

      But, to clarify (if such a thing is possible), I mean professional in the sense that someone might claim to be a professional in order to be recognised as someone of high standing. As in, "I wouldn't do that -- I'm a professional".

      So, in fact, my argument is circular.

    15. Re:Professional by Threni · · Score: 1

      I like arguments! :)

      > But, to clarify (if such a thing is possible), I mean professional in the sense that someone might
      > claim to be a professional in order to be recognised as someone of high standing. As in, "I
      > wouldn't do that -- I'm a professional".

      I can see where you're coming from. I agree largely with what you're saying - in that I believe we both share much of what we believe you should (or shouldn't) do if you want to be called a professional. I just don't see how any of the professionals who helped Jews escape Nazi Germany, or slaves escape via the Underground Railroad in the US were suddenly any less professional for it (I would argue the opposite).

    16. Re:Professional by 26199 · · Score: 1

      Well -- to be professional is not always to be likable or even right!

      IMHO ;-)

    17. Re:Professional by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're no professional if you act this way. Your opinion of the law is irrelevant; if you knowingly violate it in the course of your work, you're responsible. Morality is not an issue here.

      The patent scenario is a red herring. No one can reasonably be expected to do a patent search for every function they write. But if you recommend using the MP3 codec in your company's product without purchasing a license, you're acting unprofessionally.

    18. Re:Professional by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's rather difficult to visit without enriching Cuba, unless you plan to sleep outside and never eat anything. The only way Americans can get permission to travel is for certain exceptions, and tourism definitely isn't one of them.

      But yes, this only applies to USAians. We're the only ones stupid enough to think a 40-year-long embargo might just be enough to push Castro out of power any day now.

    19. Re:Professional by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      You can't be a professional and knowingly support illegal activity.

      So you've never even driven 1mph over the limit on the way to work?

      (I say this because other USians tell me that in many places it's common for 95% or more of the traffic to be exceeding the limit by 20 or 30).

    20. Re:Professional by 26199 · · Score: 1

      No, I haven't.

      But then I walk to work.

      And I never claimed to be a professional, so even if I had, it would be irrelevant to my statement.

      And even if it was relevant, does it really matter?

      (And if it matters, does it matter that it matters? And so on.)

    21. Re:Professional by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      "(I say this because other USians tell me that in many places it's common for 95% or more of the traffic to be exceeding the limit by 20 or 30)."

      During the morning rush hour? Please tell me where so I can move there.

      Anyways, minor traffic offenses are not considered comparable to other crimes. Generally they are not even considered misdemeanors, and you can just pay a fine without even showing up to court.

      And 30 is probably an exaggeration, even in good traffic. Depending on the state, 15-20 over is where you become eligible for reckless driving, and that is something that is taken seriously.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    22. Re:Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be a professional and knowingly support illegal activity. I'm a mobster/yakuza/RIAA lawyer you insensitive clod!
    23. Re:Professional by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      You can't be a professional and knowingly support illegal activity.

      Unless you're a professional hitman.

    24. Re:Professional by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      I simply disagree. I do not obey all laws.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    25. Re:Professional by DirtyShaman · · Score: 1

      Not true, I propose that as long as the employer is aware of the risks such behaviour is okay.

    26. Re:Professional by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That defense didn't work too well at the Nuremburg trials.

      If you engage in illegal behavior, it's not "okay", no matter what your employer is aware of.

      I hope no one ever hires you as a consultant or other professional position.

    27. Re:Professional by dkuntz · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can fly from NY to Cuba, indirect, by way of Mexico.. but you buy the ticket to Cuba.
      The laws are basicly you cant spend more than $50/day/person, including meals I believe. You're not allowed to spend more than a certain amount on souvenirs, etc.
      And the whole "cuban cigars are illegal!!!" stuff.. only if you have more than 10. If you have more than 10, you are transporting from an unfriendly nation with intent to sell, or some crap.

      There are very very few places that Americans are not allowed to go, from the US. Most are due to that country's laws.. ie: North Korea. Most are on the State Department's "If you go, you probably wont make it back in one piece" list, like Mogadishu, Iran, several African nations. And all that list means, other than you'll probably get killed is.. if you get arrested, kidnapped, etc.. you're on your own, you knew what you were in for when you went... unless you're related to some bigwig politician.

      --
      OMG... I have a sig?
    28. Re:Professional by beav007 · · Score: 1

      Cannabis has nothing at all to do with software engineering
      You obviously never looked at the Win2000 source code after it was released...
    29. Re:Professional by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for the information. I didn't realize we were allowed to go there at all for anything "humanitarian" or religious reasons or similar.

    30. Re:Professional by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, I haven't, but judging by my experience with Windows, I don't think any cannabis was involved in its creation. Crack cocaine is a good possibility though.

    31. Re:Professional by ^me^ · · Score: 0

      in south florida, during rush hour, I drive the opposite way of the rush and often see the majority of traffic (going my way) passing me by at +30.

      that said, I'm in Florida, and it's um... different here?

      - mjc

      --
      No one ever says, 'I can't read that ASCII E-mail you sent me.'
    32. Re:Professional by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And

      * I will not run Cartesian joins

    33. Re:Professional by steveg · · Score: 1
      An engineering "Profession" must have:
      • an established body of knowledge
      • established best practices (codes)
      • accredited education programs
      • established codes of professional conduct and ethics
      • examinations (licensing)
      The ACM would like us to be a "Profession", but thinks we're not there yet.
      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    34. Re:Professional by Threni · · Score: 1

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6626073. stm

      And sometimes to be professional - if that means allowing people to suffer and/or die rather than break patent law to treat people - is the 'wrong' thing to be. Save people's lives first; worry about other people's definitions of your job second.

  10. Of course. by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 2, Funny

    How ELSE would I get anything done?!

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    1. Re:Of course. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How ELSE would I get anything done?!

      I know you meant it as a joke, but it bears repeating. Whenever possible, I always pirate my software first, even at work (own business). The last thing I'm going to do is shell out hundreds of dollars on software that turns out to be shit.

      For those a little skeptical I even had a recent example with Winfax pro. Very glad now that I went with Snappyfax instead, instead of shelling out money for Symantec's piece of crap.

      And yes, I know that a lot of software is try before you buy, but that's a very recent development, and generally doesn't cover anything more than $50~$100 anyway.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, nice one!
      Honestly, I don't care for this cheap Microsoft crap!
      Over at my company, my predecessors built an application based on oracle 10g using enterprise edition features.
      Right now it's running on 8 cores (demanding 8 EE licenses $40k apiece). Soon we will have to scale up to 24 cores.

      Oh, btw. Did I mention that we didn't buy a single license? My CIO is freaking out (actually he gave up and became cynical) and I am starting to wonder if there are more users of unlicensed expensive systems?
      I work in Eastern Europe, luckily, so the BSA & co. can kiss my ass -- for now :)

    3. Re:Of course. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And yes, I know that a lot of software is try before you buy, but that's a very recent development, and generally doesn't cover anything more than $50~$100 anyway.

      Every piece of software for which I have recently downloaded a free trial has been over $100. Most recently, there was a $7500 reporting server product, and a $500 reporting product.

      Any company with software worth installing will offer you a trial. Sometimes you have to prove that you have the money to actually buy the software...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Of course. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Ah, but what were the limitations on the software? I rarely see software that's "trial" that is the full verion, it's usually crippled in some way. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that my business (at least the one I was referring to) is not IT-related...

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:Of course. by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      BrainMaker (respected neural network software): basic version, $195. Professional, $795. No free trial.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    6. Re:Of course. by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      BrainMaker (respected neural network software): basic version, $195. Professional, $795. No free trial.

      Have you tried the free and open source Weka ?

    7. Re:Of course. by luckymutt · · Score: 1

      How about all of Autodesk's products? Ex: 3ds Max ($3500) you get a 30 day trial, with NO limitations/disabled features of any sort.

    8. Re:Of course. by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      It wasn't even a joke. Our tech guy, with the approval of the boss, has installed pirated ONLY software. We haven't even paid for a copy of Windows that didn't come on a Dell, I don't think... seriously, without pirated software, I'd be working with a pencil and paper (and they'd probably be stolen pencils.)

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    9. Re:Of course. by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      ArchiCAD 9 & Constructor: $40,000, free trial has no export capabilities. Uhm... wooooo.

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    10. Re:Of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two legit copies of Winfax Pro, but its such a pile of sh*t I use Hylafax instead. If you are bothered about your actions, you may claim I gave you one of my copies.

      Or even better, send your name and address on the back of a $50 bill, and I'll post you the original CD, still in its box.

    11. Re:Of course. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Time limit only. This is typical. Some products with HASP protection, once you convince them you're serious, they'll mail you media and a HASP key (and sue you for some $15,000 or some shit if you don't return them.) But this stuff was just downloaded, webform, etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Of course. by m3j · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm the same way. When I was shopping for a new car last year I tried a few out for a while. I'd go out late at night, jimmy the locks, and then test drive them for a week or so before returning them.
      I know cars aren't the same as software, but I'd only take them from the long term parking lot at the airport, so it's not like anyone didn't have them back when they needed them.

  11. Understand your situation. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you don't get it in writing, should anything happen and the company be audited ... YOU will be the one blamed and fired.

    Everyone else will swear that YOU were the loose cannon. That they would NEVER violate a copyright. That they are 100% honest.

    Really. They're already asking you to violate your ethics / principles. Why would you believe that they wouldn't lie about who's idea it was?

    1. Re:Understand your situation. by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't do it even then. Because no matter how much authorization in writing you have to back you up that you broke the law "only under duress" what it still boils down to is that you broke the law. Having it in writing that your employer ordered you to break the law will be a lot more valuable if you don't actually do it. At that point the worst that could happen is you would lose your job and (possibly, but unlikely) have your career ruined. Seems like a much better option than what could happen in the long-term if you went ahead and did it, and the shit ever hit the fan later. If you go ahead and do it and the shit does hit the fan later, it's all going to depend on who can afford the best lawyers - no matter how much documentation you have. After all, it's you who ultimately broke the law not your employer.

      Obviously IANAL and this is just my two cents.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    2. Re:Understand your situation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      posting as ac..
      i was told to install software that was unlicenced. It was only microsoft stuff (not a little guy). I made a statement and asked him if he was buying them next week (he was always going to buy them next week). In the end I didn't get in trouble. The boss had an ego through the roof and always took credit for everything. Told his superiors that he was doing everything etc.. HAHA! karma hurts.

    3. Re:Understand your situation. by cHALiTO · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on where he lives/works. In some countries, most companies have lots of pirated software running in their desktops, and unless it's a big corporation from which the copyright owner/CSA can make a whole bunch of money, the worst they do is send an 'auditor', have him say something around the lines of 'you have some unlicensed stuff, here's a special offer to get yourself all legal", and insist on it. Only if the company insists on using the copies w/o paying, they will take some nasty legal action (ie suing), and the guy who actually did the install will probably not be held accountable for the worst (maybe used as a witness, and have him pay a fine, but nowhere near going to jail).

      This is so, I think, because in these countries a) actually taking something to court and especially have a resolution can take AGES, even super simple stuff, and cost a lot more than a few licenses. Plus if they start suing people around like mad, people that might have kept the pirate copies, and be subject to some nice offer on licences, will instead turn to other alternatives (I'm just speculating here, but it seems plausible), and that wouldn't be good for the copyright owner either. b) people, and many MANY companies, really can't afford the software, but actually need it to work (thanks to our friends at redmond, if you pardon my zealotry), so they pirate. And no, as much as I like to offer OpenOffice to everyone and I propose it each time I get a chance, some people need MS Office. Forcing use of legal software ar prices that are really not meant for a developing economy, will add yet another block on the road, for such an economy to improve. That's one of the reasons people aren't very fond of 'free trade' agreements with copyright protection requirements attached to them.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:Understand your situation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have them hire a lawyer for you. Not their lawyer.
      Have your lawyer write the new contract and include the indemnification and complete legal fee clause and get an officer of the corporation sign. Anyone less doesn't count.

      Hopefully, by that time, they will realize what they are asking and stop. If not, then an officer of the corporation is on the hook.

      Then post the name of the company on /. so we can turn them in under whistle blower clauses and get the money.

      Or, simply explain that you morally and ethically object to violating the law, especially in this case and won't steal from another company. Nor will you steal from the company you currently work at. If they don't appreciate this, say the name on /. and find a job at a company that doesn't ask you to violate "what would Jesus do" method of thought.

      Get an officer to sign that doc. We do it all the time where I work for projects that can't afford to do things right (according to our standards; we **always** strive to be legal on all licenses to the best of our ability to understand those agreements). Usually when I explain that to the internal customer, they find a way to do it correctly, but occasionally, an officer will sign and accept the defined risk. This is at a Fortune 50 company.

  12. Just tell them... by Ariastis · · Score: 1

    That by doing so, you could be held liable under piracy laws. Ask them for a signed letter in which they remove all the blame from you and take it all upon themselves. You'll be installing OO in no time! (Or maybe eve better, your boss is going to get sued/fired. Profit!)

  13. You do know you'll be the fall guy, right? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You should go into this knowing that, if you get caught, everyone will point the finger squarely at you. That same boss who is ordering you to do this will deny that he knew anything about it and say that you did it on your own. As long as you're willing to deal with the legal and financial fallout that could hit you personally, then go for it.

    Personally, there is *NO WAY IN HELL* I would do it. Nor would I work for a company that was irresponsible enough to even ASK me to. Sounds like you've picked a pretty shady and unstable company to work for. If I were you, I would stall on the installation ("We're having some technical issues with some of the machines, sir") and start looking for a new job. DO NOT install it if you plan on doing this (they would still blame you after-the-fact).

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:You do know you'll be the fall guy, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This all well and scary talk here, but come on folks.... Who the hell has ever been busted for installing Office?!?!?! Gimme a break. Quit being so lame and terrified of the CRIME you're committing by popping in a cd. Jesus. Pretty pathetic I think, this is pretty common practice in every corporation on the planet, mostly. You know what MS does when they find out? Send you a bill. Thats it.

      Get over it. Install the fucking software and get on with your day. Nobody goes to prison for installing software. Nobody gets fired for doing what they're told. Quit making this so dramatic, its a non-issue. This is not the nazi war crimes tribunal folks!!! You have a lame IT job and I guess this adds spice to your life: *GASP!* my boss is asking me to commit a CRIME!!! What do I DO? Oh the quandary, oh the humanity....

    2. Re:You do know you'll be the fall guy, right? by grouchobear · · Score: 1

      Coming from a Fortune 500 company, I can say that this is more often the norm than the exception, at least here. While I believe strongly in "giving the devil his due", my experience has been that you do what it takes to get the job done. If that means using a "pirated" version office, so be it. As developer's we're at the mercy of management, and management see's the world from a much different perspective, or at least they do here. I'm sure there are other companys that deal with this in a different manner but it certainly isn't the practice here. Sad but true.

    3. Re:You do know you'll be the fall guy, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone has an enormous sack when posting on Slashdot about how "they would just go out and find another job!" like that is something as simple as switching which brand of shampoo they use. The job market is good right now, so its less of an issue than say a few years ago, when most of us felt quite lucky to be employed.

      There are many other factors though- he might love every other aspect of his job except for this pressure. Maybe the area he works in has few if any jobs available. He might be leaving a large 401k/stockplan/etc on the table if he leaves- only in the most low level of jobs does "just leave" have any meaning.

      I also think the most likely outcome is far worse- most managers who know they are doing wrong are too smart to fire people. Instead they will be far more subtle- giving you the minimum pay raise possible, pretty much putting you entirely out of the running for a promotion, giving you "the shit work," looking out for all the minor screw ups that just happen at times and writing them down so they can give you a bad review, etc.

  14. I've been down this road by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been in a similar situation, only for us it was the case where someone wanted to run a course in our IT Suite. They needed specific software for the course and told me this 2 days before the course was due to run, they told me they'd ordered the licenses and were on the way but might not make it until after the course was due to run.

    Knowing what these people are like, and having little confidence in their ordering of the licenses I put my foot down and refused to install it until the licenses arrived, I made the point that if this caused a problem for their course that they should perhaps consider not leaving things until the last minute in future. My line manager backed me up in my stance however my boss over-ruled both of us and told us to install it, standing my ground I defied him and refused to do so. Eventually my boss installed the software himself, so the course ran and so forth but at least I hadn't been the one to break the law, the best part? Those licenses never arrived, the whole thing was completely illegal, frankly I fail to believe the licenses were ever really ordered.

    You shouldn't worry about losing your job by refusing to do this, they'll most likely back down on any threat to sack you. If they do however follow through then you're looking at an extremely strong court case involving a massive payout for yourself. If you get sacked and know they have gone ahead installing illegal copies, your first stop should be to report them to whatever country deals with anti-piracy raids, when you report it ask that any evidence of infringement they find be made available to your court case, this will make your case pretty much un-loseable. Just bear in mind that you absolutely do not have to do this, you're entirely in the right by refusing to do so and the law will recognise that.

    One other thing to note is that if you do follow through, obey your orders and install the software - what happens if someone else reports your company? Can you really be sure they'll take the blame? What are you going to do if they say they had no knowledge of pirate software on your systems and hence the blame gets shifted entirely on you.

    I think most people pirate at least some software and home, and so some may say it's hypocritical to say the things I've said here knowing that, but there's a distinction to be made between what you do at home and being professional at work. No one has to know what you get upto at home, and so the risk is more controlled, however at work any number of your users could cash in on that $1000 software piracy report reward or whatever. Furthermore, I'd imagine the penalties for what would probably be commercial copyright infringement would be much more harsh than for home copying also.

    1. Re:I've been down this road by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      but there's a distinction to be made between what you do at home and being professional at work. No one has to know what you get upto at home, and so the risk is more controlled, however at work any number of your users could cash in on that $1000 software piracy report reward or whatever. Furthermore, I'd imagine the penalties for what would probably be commercial copyright infringement would be much more harsh than for home copying also.
      There's another distinction too -- at home you're exposing yourself to risk; you get caught, you face the consequences. At work you're exposing your employer as well as yourself.

      I think it's a lot more wrong to expose others than to expose just myself.

      Err, I probalby could phrase that a bit better... I think it's bad to expose others to risk than to just expose myself to risk.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:I've been down this road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... they told me they'd ordered the licenses and were on the way ...



      simple: just tell them you will call the sales department of the vendor to confirm the shipment. Either they freak out or give you a contact to call...

    3. Re:I've been down this road by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I would have called the company about the lisences.
      "Hi, this is Bob from XYZ company. I'm calling about some lisences we ordered.
      I was wondering if we can gt an email saying it's alright to install even though the lisences are still in the mail on the way here?"

      There are two thing that could happen:
      1) You have to work your way to a supervisor who oks it. I've done this myself. Usually about 30 minutes on the phone and you get an OK.

      2) "What's that? you don't ahve a record of us ordering them? oh know, there is a mistake. Tell you what, give me your email address so I can CC you when I tell my boss that someone screwed up!"

      Send an email to your boss(sans the email you just got.)
      Someone at XYZ company screwed up. They have no record of our purchase. I ahve the email of a sales guy who can probably get this straightened out.

      I will be holding off from installing until I see an email from those bozos saying they got it straightened out.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:I've been down this road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you work for SAIC.

      :P
    5. Re:I've been down this road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi John,

      I exposed myself to your wife last night.

    6. Re:I've been down this road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, you were right either way.

      I am way too sad :(

    7. Re:I've been down this road by Tesla+Tank · · Score: 1

      I apologize in advance for kind of hijacking your thread.

      Here's a question. Is it legal to use the trial version of Office in a commercial environment?

      The reason I ask is because I needed a newer version of Office to open a document that wouldn't open in Word 97. IT said they don't have the money to purchase a copy. Since I only really needed Office for that particular case, I used the trial version of Office. I made a point to check any legal restriction on it, but there wasn't anything I could find on the Microsoft website. Still, it bugs me. In my mind, I always thought the trial version was for non-commercial use.

  15. Discuss it with Human Resources by div_2n · · Score: 1

    If you truly object, meet with someone in HR and let them know you are being told to do something illegal and, therefore, against your moral principles.

    If you are given no other choice but to install anyway to save your job, send an email to your boss, the person that told you to install the software illegally (if a different person than your boss) and to the person you spoke with in HR. Blind carbon copy an outside email of yours. If you have a lawyer, I'd BCC him or her as well. If and when the stinky hits the fan, let them try to hang you out to dry.

    1. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by div_2n · · Score: 1

      Whoops, forgot to include what to say in the email:

      I will install this software despite my objections because I am required to do so as my job, but I just wanted to remind you that we need to buy the licenses for these software installations as soon as possible.

    2. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      If you truly object, meet with someone in HR and let them know you are being told to do something illegal and, therefore, against your moral principles.

      Forget HR. Send an e-mail to someone in the legal department asking them to advise you, in their official capacity, that it is not your legal responsibility to keep track of the licensing for those software items and that if the company is turned into the BSA, that it is the responsibility of your boss that the company lost all that money, not your own responsibility. Make sure to outline the financial and legal liability this poses including the fact that the license you signed for the other copies gives them a right to perform an audit and an estimate of how much the company will have to pay if the copyright violation is discovered.

      Make sure you use e-mail not the phone, as lawyers know very well the difference between a phone conversation that is not backed up by default and an e-mail record which may come back to haunt them. That should cover your own ass, since it is a civil issue and you are an agent of the company. The chances are the legal department will also take care of the issue for you.

    3. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by twitter · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good idea, but he's screwed anyway. His boss will deny it and then paper his file. He'll be better off at an honest company.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    4. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by Phillup · · Score: 1

      Whoops, forgot to include what to say in the email:

      I will install this software despite my objections because I am required to do so as my job, but I just wanted to remind you that we need to buy the licenses for these software installations as soon as possible. If they wanted you to kill somene as "part of the job"... would you?

      Illegal is illegal, it is only a matter of degree.

      If you commit murder because your boss told you he would fire you if you didn't... you would still end up in jail.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    5. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I love this idea. Personally I have already refused to do a number of things at my job, mostly to use copyrighted materials as the basis for advertising. So far I haven't come up against a wall for any of them... but I had the fortune of dealing with reasonable people on those issues.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by idontgno · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If they wanted you to kill somene as "part of the job"... would you?

      Depends on the job, doesn't it?

      It still ultimately comes down to your moral and legal responsibility. But for most people, it doesn't take that much rationalizing to find a set of circumstances to justify any "obviously immoral" action.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by metagnat · · Score: 1

      I think there is also a matter of degree, here. Being forced into illegal software would certainly not gall me or offend my ethical sensibilities nearly as much as being forced to kill someone. I don't think the two are at all in the same league.

      -E

    8. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by Rydia · · Score: 1

      No, no, no.

      That's not a defense. If he did that, he would be completely screwed. They would have to have a gun at his head or maybe- maybe- a family member's for duress to come into play. This is really, really bad advice.

    9. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by ChadAmberg · · Score: 1

      Exactly. As an independent software vendor, I have a serious problem with someone pirating my software. Shooting people who do it could be kinda fun!

    10. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by alex_guy_CA · · Score: 1

      You did not deserve a flame mod.

    11. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Huh? No one in the Army ever kills anyone. Their job is to neutralize enemies.

    12. Re:Discuss it with Human Resources by electr01nik · · Score: 1

      Exactly. As an independent software vendor, I have a serious problem with someone pirating my software. Shooting people who do it could be kinda fun!

      Mod parent informative.

      Note for rolodex: remember to purchase licenses; vendor shoots software pirates.

  16. I would by bherman · · Score: 1

    But I would make the sounds (all of them) for the program a recording of my voice going "Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrggggg"

    --
    Error: Sig not found.
  17. Just don't do it by Goose42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The answer is simple, just don't do it. Just do your other jobs instead of following your boss' order to break the law. If he fires you, sue. You'll win multiple years of lost salary easily when the reason you were fired is that you were ordered to commit illegal acts and wouldn't. In the end, it'll look good on the resume for your next job, because future employers will know that you'll stand your ground for the things that are right.

    Honestly, I'm speaking from a little bit of experience here, so keep a stiff upper lip and don't give in to your boss.

    1. Re:Just don't do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. A florida court has found that if you do not follow orders of your superiors, even if it is against federal law, they can fire you.

    2. Re:Just don't do it by temcat · · Score: 1

      Wow, looks like the court seriously fscked up here... Do you by chance have a link to the court decision on that case?

    3. Re:Just don't do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, there's more to the spectrum to "you do it" or "they fire you". Maybe you don't do it, and they never mention it again, but they pass you over for promotions, deny you other opportunities, put you at the bottom of the vacation list, etc. And you'd never know: it's easy to discriminate without making it totally clear what you're doing.

      So yeah, if the overreact and fire you / harass you / call you out, the evidence will be overwhelming, and you'll get paid like crazy. And the corrupt company will get rid of the incompetent boss, and install one that can cover his ass.

  18. Tough call by Ravensfire · · Score: 1

    If I did, it would only be after a CYA e-mail to the controller. Something along the lines of "I'm ready to begin installing Office on our PC's. From what I can tell, we only have XX licenses, so we can only install it on XX machines. Can you confirm for me that we have enough licenses for the YY machines I'm supposed to install it on?"

    Put the controller on the spot, and make darn sure that you print out his response, and forward that message to a few outside addresses.

    -- Ravensfire

    --
    "But we decide which is right, and which is an illusion"
    1. Re:Tough call by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd be a little less weaselly than that. I'd stop at "I'm ready to begin installing Office on our PC's. From what I can tell, we only have XX licenses, so we can only install it on XX machines.", and let him specifically say that there are enough licences or to order me to do it anyway.

  19. LOL, consulting Slashdot about ethics is like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...well, I don't have a good analogy. Anyway, just download it off bittorrent or piratebay and tell yourself it's not theft. That's the Slashdot Way© (note the ironic use of ©)

  20. No way!!! by IvanCruz · · Score: 1

    My boss tell someone to do it for me...

  21. At the very least, get it in writing by WindBourne · · Score: 1
    Something along the line of

    I controller so and so, understand that I have been offered an opportunity to be legal with Open Office and am telling so-and-so that he, against his wishes, is to install MS Office on all systems. I have been told that this is illegal and I take FULL responsibility.
    If he signs it, then install it. Give him a copy and you keep the original at home in a fireproof safe or in a safe deposit box.
    But if he does not take FULL responsibility, then why leave yourself dangling?
    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  22. Ask for it in writing by El+Torico · · Score: 1

    If someone directs you to do something that is questionable, then you should send them an e-mail or hard copy memorandum requesting specific direction. You should also inform them of the legal and/or ethical rules that may apply. In short, ask for it in writing. You won't get that directive in a response; they will quickly change their mind.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  23. Common Practice by killercoder · · Score: 1

    This is a relatively common practice in Smaller Shops (or at least it was when I worked in them). I know of three cases where said smaller shop grew to the point that they came to the attention of the manufacturer (in most cases Microsoft), and the bill to avoid litigation and go ligit was huge (at least one was 700K). You need to explain to the comptroller that it is illegal, that they are risking stiff penalties and fines, and you STRONGLY recommend that they either buy the software or learn to use the free alternatives. If they can't afford to buy it now, do they really think they'll be able to afford it at 3 times the retail price? (typical settlement) At the end-of-the-day you'll install what they give you, and support it. I would ask for a letter that simply states "The company assumes all liability with regards to the validity and authenticity of the software. is a technical support specialist who assists in the deployment and support of the software, but in no-way-shape-or-form is incurring personal liability for the software or the use to which its put." Killer Killer

  24. Turn them in by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

    It's one thing to pull the "starving student" or "I wasn't going to pay for it anyways" or "it's not theft, it's copyright infringement" card. I would argue it's another thing entirely to make profit as a business by infringing on others work (even though you could argue gates and jobs are guilty of the same thing).

    1) If you consider yourself a moral person, AND if this act is against your morals, then it is the right thing to do
    2) It is difficult for OSS to gain much ground if everyone is just pirating MS
    3) You could lose your job, so you must do a cost:benefit ratio. Are your morals important enough to lose your job?

  25. Absolutely not by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    I don't know if I'm paranoid or what, but pirated software in the office is a huge no-no for me. Administrating 30+ Windows workstations, 30+ Mac workstations, and 10-/+ servers I attempt to keep them clean of any incriminating bits. I just know that it would be 'my fault' if anything were to happen. But it gets tough keeping all the users from installing the latest versions of whatever software before we buy it, or software we simply don't own. I've check workstations after employees have left to find a plethora of illegal software - some of it being things they never even attempted to acquire legally through the company.

    This really blows me away. We hired them to do a job using our tools and for whatever reason they've decided that that just isn't good enough. Suddenly there are various software packages on their computer that I did not provide and they're creating files that no one else can open. Then they leave and I'm forced to either continue stealing the software or purchase it just so we can manipulate the work they've done. Boot to the God Damned head, jackass. Thanks for ruining my day.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  26. Any disgruntled employees? by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're the IT guy. Find an employee who is disgruntled (or maybe just use the guy that keeps eating your lunch out of the fridge even though it's CLEARLY marked with BIG BLACK MARKER with your name). Send an email ratting the company out to the BSA from that person's account. Put a BSA bumper sticker on his car. Sneak into his house and put a thank you card ("The Business Software Alliance thanks you for reporting 500 scofflaw software stealing terrorists in 2006! Wishing you more success bringing down more scum in 2007!") on his mantle.

    Meanwhile, forge emails from your boss to you threatening to fire you if you don't immediately and without question install as much illegal software as possible. Include some BSA baiting ("And if the BSA comes around, I've got a few shotgun shells with their names on it! Yeehaw!") For extra points, forge an entire email thread wherein he continues to threaten you and the BSA and anyone else you can think of despite your continued objections. Throw in some sentences where you attempt to convince him of his wrongs through Bible verses.

    When the BSA comes to the office, throw a Molotov cocktail from your boss's window toward their car. Leave the building and wait across the street for the SWAT team to arrive. If your boss tries to come out, as soon as you can see him coming out the door yell as loud as you can "He's got a gun!"

    This should take care of your problem.

    1. Re:Any disgruntled employees? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Parent is now my new favorite post.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:Any disgruntled employees? by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      You're a Bastard, aren't you?

    3. Re:Any disgruntled employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Written like a true BofH.

    4. Re:Any disgruntled employees? by mackil · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%!

    5. Re:Any disgruntled employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Simon, is that you?

    6. Re:Any disgruntled employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a Bastard, aren't you?


      You just never know.. he might be THE bastard.

      Simon, is that you?
    7. Re:Any disgruntled employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Leave the building and wait across the street for the SWAT team to arrive. If your boss tries to come out, as soon as you can see him coming out the door yell as loud as you can "He's got a gun!""

      You forgot this part...

      "What's happening officer? It's $BOSS, isn't it?? I knew I should have been worried about all those games of $VIOLENT_VIDEO_GAME they were playing at lunchtime! That guy was a bomb just waiting to go off!"

    8. Re:Any disgruntled employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree. Reading all the wanna be lawyers talk was worth it for this comment alone.

  27. Stick to your guns and quit. by twitter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how are they going to behave should this come to the attention of FAST (or other enforcement body)?

    Why bother to find out?

    Tell them that you are going to Install Open Office or quit. It's not that what they have asked is morally wrong, it's that it exposes YOU to danger for their benefit. Oh yeah, it's also stupid because better software exists and they have "standardized" on the worst. You offered your advice and they discarded it, so it's time to go unless you want to be an bag man.

    By the way, the anonymous reader has already reported them. ISPs already co-operate with media companies and monitors traffic. The chances are they have monitored the post. But it won't matter because someone there will fink sooner or later.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by dougmc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh yeah, it's also stupid because better software exists and they have "standardized" on the worst.
      You aren't saying that OpenOffice is better than MS Office, are you? It's cheaper, it runs on more platforms (which is why I use it on my Linux box for the very few cases where I need Office-type software), but other than that, it's most certainly NOT better.


      I love to bash Microsoft as much as the next guy, probably more in fact, but when I'm looking for examples of great free software, OpenOffice usually isn't one of my first choices. It's slow, buggy and just as bloated as Office is -- if not more so. (AbiWord is better, but still not perfect ...)

    2. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by avronius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One e-mail message will do the job nicely.

      To: [e-mail address of manager]
      Bcc: [your personal e-mail address]
      Subject: [Product] installations and license limitations
      Body:
      [name of manager],

      I have reviewed our records and determined that we have x licenses for [product]. There are users that require this product, yet do not currently have it installed, and there are insufficient licenses to meet their needs. Unfortunately, we are not able proceed with installing more copies of this software until new licenses are purchased.

      I am attaching the name of our local [product] vendor, as well as his/her direct number, so that you can obtain additional licensing. When the new licenses arrive, we will happy to proceed with the new installations.

      Alternatively, we would be happy to install an available opensource alternative. There are a handful of products that might be more suitable in this environment, and we are willing to work with the users to ensure the right products for them.

      We are not willing to put this company at risk of litigation or prosecution for software misuse.

      Sincerely,

      [You]

    3. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by 644bd346996 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It doesn't seem that any of OO.o's shortcomings would affect the company in question. Re-read the summary to see what they can do with an office suite.

    4. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by dedazo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tell them that you are going to Install Open Office or quit.

      Very easy to sit there and say "just quit your job", isn't it?

      Oh yeah, it's also stupid because better software exists and they have "standardized" on the worst.

      Let me guess, the issue for you here is that they're not using open source as you'd like? What "better software" exists?

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    5. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Talgrath · · Score: 1

      Actually, the issue is that they want the author of the question to do something ILLEGAL that could very well land the author in jail with fines up to his eyeballs for the rest of his life. Don't believe for a moment that company brass will take the flak for a decision like this, they'll pawn it off on the IT guy to save their own asses. I agree with Twitter here, tell them to do it the legal way (buy more licenses or use OpenOffice) or quit; any company that is willing to send you to jail to save a buck is not a company you want to be with.

    6. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Well, the guy asked for suggestions on what to do. Either he must abandon his principles and break the law, or he must stick to his principles, which means not following the instructions of his immediate superiors. Practically, this usually means quitting. This is simply logic: the law of the excluded middle; either A or not A.

      OTOH, simply refusing to do something unethical doesn't always wind up with you losing your job. My mother had the same summer job for four summers during her college years. She worked for a company which sold electric grills (now defunct). Every summer, they would frequently ask her to lie to their customers, eg tell them that various things had shipped when they in fact had not. She simply said "no, I won't do that." They said "ok", and did it themselves. They kept hiring her every summer, though.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    7. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The guy's solution is one that does not expose them (or him) to any potential licensing violations, and consequently any lawsuits. Whether or not OpenOffice, or any open source solution, is better, equal or worse is irrelevant. He's offering them a solution that will offer the shallowest learning curve, will likely do most (if not all) of what they want, is cheap (as in free) and is completely legal and above board.

      I would never in a million years expose myself to potential litigation over something like this without a notarized document from my manager protecting me from all blame, and from losing my job if someone comes a'knockin' to check up on licensing violations. Since I doubt anyone's manager has the power to make that deal (unless the manager is an owner), it's going to hit the legal department, and the legal department will probably have a fit, and the whole plan will fall in its ass in a hurry.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by harrkev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could be wrong, but don't organizations like the BSA go after the companies and not the individuals?

      It seems to me that the best thing to do would be to write e-mail to the company bosses and tell them your concerns and your recomendations, and BCC it to a separate e-mail that you control. Then forward the responses. Do what your bosses ask, and if the BSA comes knocking, show them the e-mails.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    9. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that when it gets to court, you have at least some chance of your employer pointing the finger at you and saying "He installed these without our authorization", and suddenly it's you on the hot seat.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by dedazo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My question here relates to the off-hand "well you should quit" argument. There's no way for anyone to know what this person's situation is, and I doubt half the people (including dear twitter here) suggesting he quit would do that.

      Personally, I'd get evidence I was ordered to do something, like an email, and then just do it. Then quietly start looking for another job. The idea that I'm going to just barge into the CTO's office, throw my badge in his face and walk off into the sunset is a little ridiculous.

      Then again, you have to understand twitter has never had a job where he'd be exposed to something like this, so that complicates the validity of his advice. The only reason he jumped in here was to argue that OpenOffice is "better" than Microsoft Office. He calls it "evangelism".

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    11. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, it's also stupid because better software exists and they have "standardized" on the worst.
      That has got to be the lamest justification for defying company policy I've ever read. You will be fired for that, and there's hardly a contract in the world that would prevent them. I'd stick to the "I was asked to do something unlawful" defense and shut the frack up with the snotty "I know better" insubordination.
      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    12. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, this isn't a criminal issue - it's civil. If you can show that you were just following orders, that should be enough to Cover Your Ass.

      If they come asking you to duplicate and sell Office CDs, well then that's another matter.

      If you are the vengeful sort, a call to the BSA would be a nice touch.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by gregleimbeck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do many of these actually end up in court? From what I understand, after an audit, BSA gives you a reasonable amount of time to gain compliance before you actually get hit with any fees.

      --

      P.S.,

      This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.

    14. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The company can accuse all it wants -- unless they actually file charges, it's just going to look bad for them to lay it on you. And if they do file, discovery will tear their case and more than a few of their careers to shreds.

      captcha: battles

      indeed.

    15. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Very easy to sit there and say "just quit your job", isn't it?

      I've quit more than one dishonest employer and don't regret it. They never pay their would be bag men well anyway.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    16. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by oldgeezer1954 · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, this isn't a criminal issue - it's civil. "

      The depends on the country. In Canada you'd face up to five years in jail for each pirated copy.

      It's criminal law up here and not civil.

    17. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by jon_joy_1999 · · Score: 1

      By the way, the anonymous reader has already reported them. ISPs already co-operate with media companies and monitors traffic. The chances are they have monitored the post. But it won't matter because someone there will fink sooner or later.
      could have been written from a home computer, or from a PWAP, or some other non-work place. thanks for assuming it was written at work though :thumbsup:
      --
      there are 10 types of people in this world; those who get this joke, and those who don't
    18. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by lhand · · Score: 4, Informative
      Whow sport!
      Saying my boss tole me to will not protect you.
      In the United States there is such a thing as criminal copyright infringement:
      Title 17-

      Sec. 506. Criminal offenses

      (a) Criminal Infringement.--Any person who infringes a copyright
      willfully either--
      (1) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial
      gain, or
      (2) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic
      means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or
      phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total
      retail value of more than $1,000,

      shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, United
      States Code. For purposes of this subsection, evidence of reproduction
      or distribution of a copyrighted work, by itself, shall not be
      sufficient to establish willful infringement.
      The punishment is up to 3 or 5 years and $2500.
    19. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by bob_herrick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately, we are not able proceed with installing more copies of this software until new licenses are purchased. [emphasis added] It's not that it is unfortunate, it's that it would be illegal. It's not that you are incapable of doing an installation, it's that to do so would break the law. I would rewrite this sentence to reflect the situation, rather than leaving room for 'misinterpretation.' Something like the following is what I have in mind.

      Under the terms of our license with [whomever], it is not legal for us to install more copies unless we purchase additional licenses.
      This serves to put the decision maker on clear notice, and forms the basis for you legitimate refusal if it comes to that.

      Either way this comes out, update your CV and get it launched.
    20. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by iocat · · Score: 1
      Just send an email, bccing yourself (or offline account), saying "You're asking me to do something that's illegal and could open the company to significant legal and financial penalties. Are you sure you want to do this?"

      They won't.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    21. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I'd rather not have my integrity called into question at all. I simply will not do something illegal because my employer asks. I will not be put in any position where I could be held liable, or even accused of wrongdoing. No employer has the right to ask it of me.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    22. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Why offer to quit? I'm pretty sure its illegal to fire someone because they won't break the law. Just offer to install Open Office or nothing at all.

      Anyways, this isn't the type of question you should be asking on /. This is the type of question you should be asking your (or your company's) legal counsel.

      Remember, this is not like installing pirated software on your dorm room computer back in college. That is certainly illegal, but its unlikely that you will ever get in trouble for it as its not worth it for MS to go after you. Your company, on the other hand, is a much juicier target.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    23. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Geez, I thought you were all enlightened up there. That's a waste of time for your cops. I guess they aren't busy tracking down handgun and marijuana crimes :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    24. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that everytime someone leaves our company we get yet another we know what you did last summer letter from the BSA.

      I've got a stack of them on my desk and am getting concerned that the BSA is unwittingly contributing to the demise of the african rain forest.

    25. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Arterion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just have to wonder if you've ever went to bed hungry.

      Ethics is further down the list of things to be true to than survival. Especially since we're talking about something as abstract as violating a copyright. No babies are being eaten, and no Nazis are riding dinosaurs. Choosing to to honor IP laws that are themselves ethically questionable over one's own survival is not something I expect anyone to do, regardless of the law. Maybe he has kids to feed. Maybe he lives paycheck to paycheck. There are a lot of reasons he might not be able to just quit.

      I think anyone who's ever gone to bed hungry would totally appreciate that.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    26. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I would suggest adding 'free' around the 'open source' part. It would give them a good reason to choose a legal alternative.

    27. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Re-read the grandparent post that made the claim that OpenOffice is a superior product to Microsoft Office. The parent poster was replying to that nonsensical claim.

    28. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by nwbvt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even better, cc your vendor and include a line like "I've included John from {insert vendor's name} whom you can contact to purchase additional licenses" (you might also want to touch it up a bit to make it sound like you suspect your boss innocently did not realize the licensing issues). That will essentially force them to abide by your decision, and if they accuse you of snitching on them you can claim you were just trying to make it easier for them to purchase the additional licenses. Plus the vendor may offer a discount to keep you from going down the open source road and you would get the credit for finding it.

      And worst case scenario, if you ever do need a new job, you have a new contact at your vendor who would certainly give you a good recommendation.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    29. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really want to continue working somewhere after they've decided they'd rather fire you? Even if they can't legally fire you, it's not likely to remain the type of place where you would enjoy working.

    30. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's what I get for learning about copyright here.

      Since he's not copying disks, though, doesn't this mean he'd just be breaking a contract?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    31. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I had a whole post written, but the long and short of it is, you needn't worry about the African rain forest. The significant energy and chemical requirements for a bleached Kraft paper mill, and the significant need for skilled workers and on-site engineers pretty much blow the whole idea away. I was reading about an industrial plant with a much less complicated process than bleached Kraft being run in Africa(I know it's a whole continent, but it's not a very accomodating one), and the operators are basically illiterate, and any time they send in a skilled person from outside, he or she gets kidnapped and ransomed. Also, the lumber requirements of making pulp mean that rain forests would make terrible lumberyards. Most pulp is made with the fastest growing trees possible, so the mill doesn't completely irradicate the trees in the area, removing the use of a paper mill in not that many years.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    32. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by jonathan_the_ninja · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, the breakdown with Abiword vs. Office, for me, comes down to stability. I have had Linux abiword (this is Linux abiword, not Windows abiword, mind you) crash one too many times, and now I've been using Word on Windows for 6 months now and have not had a single crash. Yet with Abiword I had crashes every now and then...(although my brother, a writer, uses Windows abiword for all of his writing and has never had it crash). I think that almost all of us on /. like to say that Microsoft's software is just "bad", but many times it's less true than we might like to think. But when M$ software doesn't work, it's almost always a worse thing than if OSS software doesn't work because there's so little you can do.

      --
      I love NetHack.
    33. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by lhand · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since he's not copying disks, though, doesn't this mean he'd just be breaking a contract? Alas, he is copying disks. From the CD to the hard disc.

      Remember when they wanted to force an additional license for when one copied something from his disc to memory? Glad nothing came from that.
    34. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by inca34 · · Score: 1

      Ever used unemployment checks? If you're so unmarketable that you can't get a job in that kind of time frame, you're kind of in a bad position anyway. Stay diverse and marketable or die. It's the way of the market.

      Cheers

    35. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by oldgeezer1954 · · Score: 1

      Well in all fairness I don't know of a soul who's been charged with a criminal offense but who wants to be first.

      Nah... They only need to nail about every fourth pusher and then they're too stoned to go after copyright crimes... :)

    36. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by medge_42 · · Score: 1

      If, as the poster says, the users use these tools minimally, I would lean towards just installing Open Office and not say anything, see if anyone notices. Then when the fan is hit they can say "Saved you so much."

      Better a fait accompli than a complete failure!

    37. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd send something like that registered snail mail.

    38. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I guess my next question is: has anyone been prosecuted criminally for installing Office on more than one computer?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    39. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the purposes of the submitter, OO.o is almost certainly superior to MS Office. Just because it is going to be used in a corporate environment doesn't mean they need all the obscure and complex features of MS Office that haven't been duplicated in OO.o. It is nonsensical to claim that OO.o is better than MS Office in every way, but you were the one to imply that that was the claim.

    40. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Trust me, they will. Same thing happened to me.

      I sent such an email. Was then called into the managers office and told in no uncertain terms that if I sent an email like that again I'd be kicked out of the building. They don't like that stuff because it's tracable.

      This company had one MSDN for 100 employees. An unlicensed exchange server, mostly unlicensed XP, unlicensed VS2003, unlicensed office, you name it, they didn't license it.

      They also ran a single (pirated) vmware GSX server and rented the resulting virtual machines to customers not telling them they were virtual.

      This is not uncommon - every company I've ever been with has had the same attitude.

      Of course when they all but ordered me to hack into a rival companies servers and steal their data I put my foot down - stripping it from webservers and demo versions of their software is fair game... hacking? I wasn't going to do jail time for them and refused.

    41. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by anagama · · Score: 1

      Don't ask "your company's" legal counsel. Their duty is to the company, not to you. I don't disagree with the first part however, getting your own legal counsel wouldn't hurt.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    42. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by adrianmonk · · Score: 1

      Tell them that you are going to Install Open Office or quit.

      I wouldn't bring OpenOffice into the discussion. It's fine to throw it out there as an alternative one time, but once it has been mentioned and rejected, drop it.

      The best thing to do is to make a personal decision about whether you want to seek to continue to work there or whether the relationship you have with the company has been damaged beyond recovery. Although human nature is to want to get away from something like this, often relatively minor stuff like this can be worked out.

      So, if you want to quit, then quit. If you want to stay, I think you need to do something like the following:

      1. Refuse to install the software. Don't adopt an attitude of moral superiority. Don't be particularly adversarial. Don't offer ideas on what to do instead. Just refuse, and explain your refusal: that it's illegal, that it's neither reasonable nor professional of them to ask you to do that, that you're not obligated to do it, and that you won't do it.
      2. If you feel that a situation is developing where there may be repercussions (perhaps someone who will try to find a way to punish you for refusing), then go to HR or the company owners/management and make them aware of the situation. Again, don't be adversarial. Just let them know that you want things to work out with the company and that these things must be taken care of if that is going to happen. If they refuse or won't back you up, then you know where they stand, and staying is probably a losing battle. It's possible, though, that they will back you up. They may even respect you for standing your ground.
    43. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by MayorDefacto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I sent such an email. Was then called into the managers office and told in no uncertain terms that if I sent an email like that again I'd be kicked out of the building. They don't like that stuff because it's tracable.

      Seriously, I know you value your paycheck, but LEAVE. It sounds like your company has serious ethical deficiencies that border on criminality. Based on the fact that they're asking you to do something illegal and refuse to listen to the voice of reason-- especially in light of the fact that they told you you'd be out on your ass for bringing this up in a traceable forum-- you really need to remove yourself from such a toxic work environment. The stress of having to find another job pales in comparison to the stress of being the fall guy when their scheme is discovered.

      Do what's best for YOU and get out!

    44. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      Your harsher language suggests that you believe this type of misuse is criminal in nature. I don't believe it is. At most, the company would simply be liable for either copyright infringement, or breach of contract if an existing contract governs their use of other licensed copies of the software. The software vendor would be able to recover monetary damages in the event of copyright infringement, or pursue whatever other form of remedy the contract allows them to pursue if the contract itself is breached.

      Incidentally, this also makes the question of who's responsible less interesting. The software vendor isn't going to sue the individual employee; they're going to sue the company. The company is free to turn around and try to recover those costs from the employee, but even if we pretend they could make a case, and the damages they're trying to recover are significant enough (and they'd have to be significant to justify the costs of litigating), some random Joe Employee probably isn't going to have the cash to give them, so a lawsuit here probably isn't going to make economic sense.

      But that doesn't mean the company won't try anyway, if some vindictive people are in charge, and they could always fire you. Documentation is still your friend here, but I wouldn't be too paranoid about it.

    45. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by terjeber · · Score: 1

      I sent such an email. Was then called into the managers office and told in no uncertain terms that if I sent an email like that again I'd be kicked out of the building. They don't like that stuff because it's tracable.

      This company had one MSDN for 100 employees. An unlicensed exchange server, mostly unlicensed XP, unlicensed VS2003, unlicensed office, you name it, they didn't license it.

      You really shouldn't let someone bully you like this. If you are ordered to break the law by your company, refuse. Make the refusal traceable. BCC your self off-line. Talk to your colleagues about it so that they know you are refusing if you can. Discuss it with your HR manager if you have one.

      If they keep insisting, keep refusing until they either back off or fire you. If they fire you, sue their asses. You'll be better off.

    46. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Necroman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the advantage of working a big company. Some things move slowly and you don't have much control over, but everything I've ever seen within my company is by-the-book. I have never heard of anyone pirating software or doing any of that sort of stuff. If you can make a case for software you need, the company will normally buy it for you.

      --
      Its not what it is, its something else.
    47. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by terjeber · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even better, cc your vendor and include a line like "I've included John from {insert vendor's name} whom you can contact to purchase additional licenses

      Never, never, never. Don't do this. Bad idea. CC the HR person only. Keep it internal. Don't snitch like this, it is not your business to do that, and it can (rightfully so) make you entirely unemployable. Go the HR way and sue their asses if they fire you.

    48. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Fastolfe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, after reviewing http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#506 again, I suppose it's possible they could try to make a criminal case out of this, which certainly complicates things more than I, as an employee of this company, would probably be comfortable with. The only sane thing to do in this situation is refuse and document.

    49. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

      " . . . the legal department will probably have a fit, and the whole plan will fall in its ass in a hurry." And your employer will find some other (bullshit) reason to "let you go."

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    50. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by terjeber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally, I'd get evidence I was ordered to do something, like an email, and then just do it.

      Yeah, and that evidence would be cool reading for him in jail. He is responsible for his actions no matter what. It would be idiotic to do this when he can stick to his guns, bring in the HR responsible, document that he is sticking to his guns, and sue them if they fire him for it.

      BTW, if they do not have an HR person, he should make a simple question in the next meeting with his manager (assuming he at this stage has documented everything): "Can I please speak with the company lawyer about this?"

      When he utters that question, one out of two things will happen, they'll even back off or they will fire him on the spot. Either or he is better off.

    51. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by terjeber · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ethics is further down the list of things to be true to than survival. Especially since we're talking about something as abstract as violating a copyright.

      If you break the law, you break the law, and you take responsibility. It doesn't matter if someone "ordered" you to break the law. You see, you can't be ordered by anyone to break the law no matter what, if they did your responsibility was to completely ignore them.

      The one thing to remember is that the following is illegal for a company (1) to order an employee to break the law and (2) to fire someone for refusing to break the law. A company will normally get punished hard for firing someone for refusing to break the law.

      If the original poster sticks to his guns and still experiences significant pressure over this issue after refusing, he should seek proper legal counsel. If he is fired and he lives in the US, he could end up with a decent settlement.

    52. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      "(your company's legal counsel) duty is to the company"

      Which is why they need to be consulted. No, they would not be able to advise you if your legal needs were at odds with the company's but that is not the case here (at least not yet, that might change if you were to install the pirated software). Your legal needs and your company's are one in the same here, protection from piracy laws. Its the company's financial needs that you are at odds with.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    53. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      It already involves external parties if you are in the process of purchasing software licenses (the original ones that are to be copied). If you are claiming the manager is just misunderstanding the licensing agreements or miscounting how many licenses they currently have instead of conspiring to commit software piracy, its not snitching. And unless you are fired, HR isn't going to be able to do anything for you, and copying them only makes it look like you are planning to quit over this. The only internal party that could be helpful would be legal.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    54. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would never in a million years expose myself to potential litigation over something like this without a notarized document from my manager protecting me from all blame, and from losing my job if someone comes a'knockin' to check up on licensing violations. Since I doubt anyone's manager has the power to make that deal (unless the manager is an owner), it's going to hit the legal department, and the legal department will probably have a fit, and the whole plan will fall in its ass in a hurry.

      Been in this situation before & made sure the company which did the piracy was "put through their paces with the 'special' people who care about these things...after they fired me. Funny thing about this company...they had a history of software piracy. Was in a meeting two weeks before they let me go & let it be known in front of about 20 employees that the previous year they got dinged for $250,000 in fines and to make sure it didn't happen that year. Being that I saw several of my fellow employees install and use pirated software...felt like it was my pleasure to help them realize their "destiny". Even more funny...the company had just been acquired in a merger.

      As for the resolution...not sure how much it cost the new company and if my former manager was still employed. Myself...got another job making more money & got treated MUCH better than anyone at the former company ever did. You may ask...would I do it again??? If they treated me like crap...no decision to make. If they were a good place to be at...probably not.

      If you own a company & treat your employees like crap...you will be reported. Firmly believe that companies bring this on themselves by employees getting revenge for the way they were/are treated.

    55. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      cc your vendor

      NO. Jesus H. Christ, that's the stupidest thing I've read so far on this page, and there's some STUPID shit here.

    56. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Arterion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And let his children go hungry while he litigates?

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    57. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Arterion · · Score: 1

      The "safety net" provided by unemployment doesn't always catch everyone. And if you quit your job, for ethical reasons or otherwise, I don't think you're eligible for unemployment.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    58. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by ralatalo · · Score: 1

      There are two major ways to break the law, knowingly and unknowingly. Never knowingly break the law unless you are willing to pay the price if you're required. The unknowingly, bit is where things get interesting.

      From my reading... as far as the original poster knows there are not enough licenses, so my suggestion would be close to the previous suggestion about asking the boss to buy more licenses but I would phrase it like:

      Dear manager,

                To the best of my knowledge we do not have sufficient licenses to cover the installations you have requested. Could you please confirm that we do have additional licenses that I am unaware of or that you will acquire the additional licenses. Please verify how you would like me to proceed?

                There is a valid alternative which should resolve all the issues without any additional cost, if you have no objections I would like to install open office on a couple of the systems as a test to verify that there is no problem. Please respond if you have concerns, questions, etc...

      thanks....

              Unless the manager is pure evil he will respond, if not for the first issue then for the second. In any case... if you are directed to move forward with the installation, you have a record that your manager was made aware of the situation and you reasonably expected them to resolve the issue. If they don't respond, then install open office on a system or two and ask users to test it. This will give you additional leverage to push open office if it does work as expected, and you will be able to include the results in your next update.

    59. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by the_womble · · Score: 1

      You aren't saying that OpenOffice is better than MS Office, are you? It's cheaper, it runs on more platforms (which is why I use it on my Linux box for the very few cases where I need Office-type software), but other than that, it's most certainly NOT better.
      Of course there are ways in which OO is better:
      • Open document format - much better for long term archiving of documents
      • Fewer vulnerabilities
      • Built in PDF export
      • On licensing problems, risks or admin costs - a business advantage.
      • More familiar UI than the new version of MS Office
      Thats what I could think of straight away. More here. I am not saying OO is necessarily better, just that it depends on your needs. The one thing I would prefer MS Office for is complex financial modelling - but I do not do that any more.
    60. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, cc your vendor and include a line like "I've included John from {insert vendor's name} whom you can contact to purchase additional licenses"

      Um no, that's called being a dick. You handle this like a professional, emailing the boss letting him know that you're not going to go along with the unethical behavior and then quit if they demand that you do it. But it sounds like they're not going to change so if I were the original poster I would start looking for another job today.

      How many times have you done something marginally outside of the law? Like jaywalking? What if some goody twoshoes instead of bringing it to your attention started yelling it up and down the street?

    61. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by yoma666 · · Score: 1

      As if the company would ever officially fire him for not installing illegal copies... I think it would only lead to his boss(es) finding or creating a reason for fireing him. Stuff like that is very hard to prove, and i don't know about you but for the most part companies have way bigger legal budgets then single persons, which reduces your legal chances for success.

    62. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by nanosquid · · Score: 1

      You aren't saying that OpenOffice is better than MS Office, are you?

      In all the areas that matter (compatibility, price), it is. In the areas you're thinking of (functionality, user interface, performance), it's a toss-up. If you think MS Office is "better" in those areas, it's because you're used to MS Office, not because it's objectively and demonstrably superior for real-world users.

    63. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Raenex · · Score: 2, Informative

      And if you quit your job, for ethical reasons or otherwise, I don't think you're eligible for unemployment. Then don't quit. Refuse the order and force them to fire you.

      I could understand if somebody had no prospects and absolutely needed the job. Then again, there are lots of people in the IT industry who are not in this situation, yet will compromise themselves because they do not want to take any risk. This kind of thinking by people everywhere leads to a downward spiral in the system as a whole.

      I once worked for a financial company where they decided they needed to institute a random drug-testing policy. Nobody was happy about it, yet nobody complained to management. I told the company it was unacceptable and that I would resign when the policy went into place. Lots of people said they respected what I was doing, and you could tell they felt some shame, because they made a point of telling me their excuses about "family to think about", etc. Complete bullshit, they just didn't want to be inconvienced and take any risk.

      Funny thing is the company never followed through on the policy. Just having one employee make a stand made them rethink their position.
    64. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Gernok · · Score: 3, Informative
      Another thing to be careful with. The company I work for was in the process of getting compliant and in that process contacted a vendor to aquire licenses. This vendor actually reported the proposed transaction back to Microsoft. Shortly there after we're scrambling to produce licenses, inventory the network and report this back to Microsoft to avoid Microsoft coming into our Office to audit our network.

      We scripted the uninstall of Office off 200+ machines, and after that finished requests went through the roof. We have since denied all requests until Finance cuts a check for the remaining 80 we need.

      It's a mess to say the least...

    65. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by terjeber · · Score: 1

      And unless you are fired, HR isn't going to be able to do anything for you

      If HR can't do anything unless you are fired, HR isn't doing their job, but that is another matter. If you are CC'ing an external party on this communication, given the circumstance, you are snitching, and in a bad way. I do agree that he should get legal council however, preferably from the company lawyer.

    66. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by terjeber · · Score: 1

      nless the manager is pure evil he will respond, if not for the first issue then for the second. In any case... if you are directed to move forward with the installation, you have a record that your manager was made aware of the situation and you reasonably expected them to resolve the issue.

      Problem is - breaking the law, even unknowingly, is breaking the law. He is ultimately responsible, and his manager is clearly not interested in doing this the right way. A manager with that attitude will hang him out to dry if things go bad.

      In addition to doing the only legal thing, he should also go look for a new job, working for a company like this is not a good idea in the long run.

    67. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Better than having his children go hungry and receive a bad education while he washes dishes for the rest of his life as no IT company will hire someone who was convicted of (probably criminal) serial copyright violation at the workplace.

      If he wants maximal protection from not receiving a decent paycheck he should immediately start looking for a new job while stalling his boss in such a way that he neither violates the law nor gives them a reason to fire him. Doing so might be quite difficult.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    68. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by terjeber · · Score: 1

      As if the company would ever officially fire him for not installing illegal copies... I think it would only lead to his boss(es) finding or creating a reason for fireing him.

      Stuff like that is relatively easy to prove if he keeps a record. In order for the boss to dismiss him for other reasons, the boss would have to wait for a minimum of 6 months to build a credible cause for this issue not being the reason for his dismissal. He would in fact probably have to wait closer to a year. If the original poster still works for the same company 6 months or a year from now he is a fool, and then I really don't care what happens to him. I have no time for fools.

    69. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "I think anyone who's ever gone to bed hungry would totally appreciate that."

      Anyone who has been to jail would appreciate you don't have to "eat babies" to get there.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    70. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Very easy to sit there and say "just quit your job", isn't it?

      Let's see, at this point his choices are either:

      1. quit (or document his refusal to install the software, which amounts to the same thing), or
      2. be liable for (possibly criminal) copyright infringement.

      Only one of these choices is sane (I'll leave figuring out which as an exercise for the reader). And yes, choosing between a sane choice and an insane one is easy!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    71. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      There's no way for anyone to know what this person's situation is

      We know that, right now, he's not in jail. But if he installs the software, he will be. Therefore, regardless of how bad off he might be financially, quitting is the best of his alternatives.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    72. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have actually written into my non-disclosure agreement and contract that I'm permitted to publish my modifications to GPL code, even if we only use it internally, and have written into at least one non-disclousre agreement that I'm allowed to testify in case of criminal corporate behavior or contract violation. When the company president exploded, I pointed 3 instances of such illegal behavior that he had directly ordered or approved.

      I wasn't there long, but they failed to ever get me to sign their NDA, which they'd forgotten about when I was hired.

    73. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      Up until you open your expense form .xls file and none of the account code drop down macros work...

      O well back to the drawing board.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    74. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Arterion · · Score: 1

      In some states, the laws concerning termination are different. Here in Tennessee, anyone can fire anyone for just about anything. You're right, it's very, very hard to prove it was because of reason x and not reason y. I know I could get fired for a lot of things if my boss wanted to get rid of me. I'm not a model employee: I'm late a lot, I don't meet my deadlines always, and I spend a lot of time beating around the bush. On the flipside, they're getting the services I offer to a much cheaper price than they could otherwise. I also don't have enough experience/education to be hired in doing what I'm doing now. They pulled me off the front desk as receptionist to give me this job, because they realized it would be a good deal for all parties.

      For a small (20 employees), familial company like the one I work for, however, I'm the ideal employee: I get the job done well enough, and everyone there likes me. I fit in. It would take a lot, but if I made my boss unhappy with me, there are plenty of legitimate reasons there to fire me. I'm sure it's the case with most people who don't work for a company that hates them.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    75. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Tell them that you are going to Install Open Office or quit.

      Hold on a bit. During the bottom of the tech recession of 2002-2004, I had been asked to do questionable things similar to that also. I have a family to support and unfortunately money trumped honesty. My ass was against the wall. I fealt like shit and had that lead-weight-in-your-stomach feeling, but you gotta survive in hard times. I could start to relate to the guy in Les Miserables (sp?) who stole bread in order to live through the winter.

      The tech industry is better now (at least for a while) so now one has more choices. I would suggest the author look at moving on if one can before the next recession or H1B flood happens.

      Not necessarily an easy choice and I feel for the author. If I was single I may have been more inclined then to tell them to shove it and I'd play auto-harp in the street to make a living. But when you have a family, your perspective changes such that you don't want to take them down also with your sinking ship, thinking that is unfair to them. If I suffer for a cause, that is one thing, but not the rest of my family. Should Joan of Ark's kids suffer for Joan's choices?

    76. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I sent such an email. Was then called into the managers office and told in no uncertain terms that if I sent an email like that again I'd be kicked out of the building. They don't like that stuff because it's tracable.

      I see nothing really wrong with a message such as:

      Dear [manager],

      I wish to inform you that our licenses for [software] are probably not valid and risk lawsuits for the company. I've seen it happen before at another company [or your friend saw it]. I will complete my assignments as requested, but I just wanted to make sure you are aware of the risks.

      Slah S. Dott


      Keep a copy at home in case heck brakes loose. You've then covered your arse and the decision is up to them. They may complain about such email being sent, but you then promise not to do it again and apologize.

    77. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The punishment is up to 3 or 5 years and $2500.

      Yes, but how often does the peon get slapped with this if each side claims it is the other's fault? Most jurors are not going to take the word of the boss over the peon because they tend to relate to the peon more. Thus, being found criminally guilty is very unlikely. In most cases the company is fined or settles out of court (paying lots of money to lawyers or IP guilds).

      I am not saying it is not possible, but merely that it is highly unlikely. You are more likely to get struck by lightning.

    78. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by thsths · · Score: 1

      > In the United States there is such a thing as criminal copyright infringement

      Yes, there is, and that would be my line in this matter. However, neither of the two cases apply here. (1) does not apply, because there is no financial gain, and (2) would require distribution beyond the company.

      I think what the guy is asked for is only a license violation, which falls under contract or privat law. And in that case he is shielded completely as an employee. The license contract is between Microsoft and his employer, so he is not involved at all. Well, at least that is how it should be.

    79. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, the anonymous reader has already reported them. ISPs already co-operate with media companies and monitors traffic. The chances are they have monitored the post.

      I already knew you were a fucking idiot, but now I've realised you're a paranoid delusional fucking idiot, which makes it all the more clearer. Now I can ignore everything you ever say and do safe in the knowledge that it's not really your fault, you're just mentally ill. I hope you get better. Honestly.

    80. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Up until you open your expense form .xls file and none of the account code drop down macros work...
      Oddly enough if your company happens to use OOo, your expense form is a .ods file and all of the account code drop down macros work flawlessly.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    81. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by gsslay · · Score: 2, Insightful
      CCing emails to other parties is rarely a good way to force people to do things, and a very good way to seriously annoy them. Even if you're in the right. Even if you're doing it for the best of reasons. It should only be done as a last resort when you no longer care.

      It already involves external parties if you are in the process of purchasing software licenses (the original ones that are to be copied).


      Wrong. Whether you observe the terms of the software licenses is not ultimately the responsibility of the vendor. The only possible reason for CCing the vendor is to try to force the manager into doing the right thing, and this isn't the way to do that. All the manager has to do is claim that is was all just a misunderstanding that could have been easily resolved, but you've totally screwed any possibility of meaningful sales negotiation with the vendor because they now have inside info. They can easily then sack you with justification.

    82. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by roshanpv · · Score: 0

      It's slow, buggy and just as bloated as Office is -- if not more so. Let me tell Office productivity suits are one piece of software which is meant to bloated............... why surely because of the vast spectrum of people using it just think about it even a 10 year kid uses it even 60 year old grand pa uses it even 25 year old Ph.d student uses it It has to support all these peoples need with only one package this naturally needs to what you call bloating and about the slowness issue it's unfair to compare openoffice to MS office because all the runtime requirements for office is usually preloaded by the os and MS office runs only on 1 platform, openoffice runs on Windows Mac linux BSD solaris you name it, it's freakin impossible to achieve run time optimization and be yet so portable and the slowness is only with respect to start up time and nothing else

    83. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Adam+Hazzlebank · · Score: 1

      You aren't saying that OpenOffice is better than MS Office, are you? It's cheaper, it runs on more platforms (which is why I use it on my Linux box for the very few cases where I need Office-type software), but other than that, it's most certainly NOT better.


      I love to bash Microsoft as much as the next guy, probably more in fact, but when I'm looking for examples of great free software, OpenOffice usually isn't one of my first choices. It's slow, buggy and just as bloated as Office is -- if not more so. (AbiWord is better, but still not perfect ...)

      No, OpenOffice isn't a great piece of software. But some might say it's still better than MS Office, it promotes open standards and doesn't lock you in to a product like MS Office. Think of it like this, as a business do you want all your data encoded in a proprietary format which tries to force you in to purchasing software from one supplier, or would you rather store data using open standard which give you a degree of independence?
    84. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget -

      Often opens corrupted documents that word/excel refuse to open. Usually with no dataloss, and often the size of the resultant .doc is as little as 1/10 of the original.

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    85. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      "The only possible reason for CCing the vendor is to try to force the manager into doing the right thing, and this isn't the way to do that."

      Absolutely not. There is also the most common reason to contact vendors, the need to inquire about additional software purchases.

      "but you've totally screwed any possibility of meaningful sales negotiation with the vendor because they now have inside info."

      What inside information? That you need additional copies of software, are on a budget, and are considering open source software? Thats all the information I would include in the letter.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    86. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Well obviously you do this before installing the pirated software (which shouldn't be hard since you are not going to install it in the first place, right?).

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    87. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by deragon · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that MS products are better than OO.org products. OO.org would do better if they put less resources on PDF exporting and more on GUI design and features. I get the impression that they are only building a PDF generator. At each version release, I have the impression that the main feature coming out is always about better PDF support, over anything else.

      --
      Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    88. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Alt_Cognito · · Score: 0

      And for crying out loud people, lying in court is perjury, while I'm not saying it doesn't happen, there are SERIOUS consequences if these people get caught. Make it reasonably tracable and you have nothing to worry about complying with the law.

    89. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Think of it like this, as a business do you want all your data encoded in a proprietary format which tries to force you in to purchasing software from one supplier, or would you rather store data using open standard which give you a degree of independence?

      Nice idea, but you miss the point that most businesses don't have that independance. If a company decides to migrate away from MS Office they could use an app to convert all the documents to whatever open standard they wanted.

      The real barrier to switching is people and productivity. Everyone is used to MS Office, they know how to use it. If you try and switch your company to a different program there will be people who will use the unfamiliarity of the new software as an excuse to sit around and do sweet F.A. There will be some people who will get slightly less done while they learn but there will be more who use the change as a justification for pissing about more.

      The combined effect of both these groups of people will be lower productivity in the workplace and no manager wants this.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    90. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      This is simply logic: the law of the excluded middle; either A or not A.


      But it is also a classic logical fallacy--forcing a choice between alternatives that are in fact not the only ones. "Abandon your principles or quit!" is an example of the fallacy.

      OTOH, simply refusing to do something unethical doesn't always wind up with you losing your job.


      And here you yourself admit you're using the fallacy.

      Chris Mattern
    91. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Corwn+of+Amber · · Score: 1

      Slowness is with regard to startup time AND frame rate. (Try to use any port OOo + X11 or NeoOffice on a Mac Mini G4. And weep.)

      Slowness is not due to portability. Fast code is fast code. (I am SO not going to try to read the millions LOC in OOo...)

      --
      Making laws based on opinions that stem up from false informations leads to witch hunts.
    92. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by BVis · · Score: 1

      Do not quit. Make them fire you. File for unemployment compensation; if they contest it, they will have to answer questions as to why they fired you, and I can bet you they won't want to answer those questions.

      Then again, I've had former employers attend one of those hearings, lie blatantly and in ways that are easily disproven, and had them win anyway.. so YMMV. Don't quit, don't do the installs. Use any interim time between your refusal and your termination to find another job. If you don't have one by the time they fire you, ring up the BSA. They love that shit, and you'll get a nice bounty if they do find violations. File for unemployment while the BSA is investigating, and bring the documentation that you gave the BSA to any unemployment hearing.

      It is possible that you'll get screwed, but you'll be looking for a new job in any case. If you don't want to out-and-out refuse to install (and not following management's instructions is grounds for termination for cause) get the request in writing.

      I know this is a little redundant, but I wanted to offer my strategy.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    93. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by avronius · · Score: 1

      If you want to bring the vendor in, you must change the type of e-mail message.

      To: [vendor]
      cc: [manager]
      Subject: Software license inquiry
      Body:
      Dear [vendor],

      I have several questions about software licensing and your product.

      1. Do you have a utility that will allow me to easily identify how many copies of this software is currently installed in my environment?
      2. Can you provide me with a price quote for licenses for your product? Please include prices for complete software sets, as well as license only [no media, no manuals]:
        - 1 license
        - 3 licenses
        - 5 licenses
        - 10 licenses
        - site license
      3. If we choose to order more of your product, can we immediately install additional copies of the software while waiting for licenses to arrive?
      4. Can you recommend alternate versions of your product that might suit the needs of users with less requirement than the full version of your product? Cost saving is very important for us, and will weigh heavily on our decisions to continue to use this product.

      Thank you for all of your assistance in this matter,

      - [you]

    94. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      That's what you get for working at a company stuck back in the 80's.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    95. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Mebbe it's just time to call the BSA stormtroopers at that point.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    96. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Adam+Hazzlebank · · Score: 1

      The real barrier to switching is people and productivity. Everyone is used to MS Office, they know how to use it. If you try and switch your company to a different program there will be people who will use the unfamiliarity of the new software as an excuse to sit around and do sweet F.A. There will be some people who will get slightly less done while they learn but there will be more who use the change as a justification for pissing about more.
      I'd actually agree. What I was trying to point out was that there are business reasons you could use to say Open Office is better than MS Office in some respects. Right now for most businesses the retraining v lock-in equation works out in favor of MS Office most of the time, but that might not be the case in all scenarios.
    97. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If you're a professional then you should be able to tell your employer/client to f*ck off. Otherwise you're not really a professional. You're just a fancy laborer. State Unemployment payments shouldn't even come into this. You should have a disaster recovery plan in place and sufficient resources to fund it.

      Why would you run your life in a manner that would get you fired if you did the same thing with a server or a desktop machine?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    98. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Xybre · · Score: 1

      I've gone to bed hungry.
      Survival is about a lot more than a comfy IT job.

      I've had pirated software on my computer because another employee installed it, I promptly removed it and replaced it with an alternative.

      My belief is that if you make money with pay-for software, the company/author(s) deserve to be paid because you're using their product to make your money.

      --
      Eternity is a time bomb.
    99. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      'Disturbed employer-employee relation'. Very valid and legal. You probably will receive a months' pay per employed year at that company, and that's it. You'll be on your way out, anyhow. My advice: do it, mail it, let people know you did it, and why you shouldn't. And mail that off-site. You can't _win_ this.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    100. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Please, if you work in a white collar job, you dont know anything about true survival.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    101. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by roshanpv · · Score: 0

      You need to upgrade you Computer with a faster processor especially a faster GPU I Do acknowledge one thing The scroll feature of OO is broken and it will be fixed..........

    102. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by BVis · · Score: 1

      You probably will receive a months' pay per employed year at that company
      What color is the sky on your planet? The most I've heard of anyone that I know getting when they get terminated is a month's pay. Most of them are lucky to get their coffee mug back (ie personal property) before they're escorted to the door by security, and I've actually seen cases where someone has asked for severance pay because of a layoff and actually been *yelled at* for daring to ask about such a thing, like the soon-to-be-former employee had insulted them.
      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    103. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by savanik · · Score: 1

      Of course when they all but ordered me to hack into a rival companies servers and steal their data I put my foot down - stripping it from webservers and demo versions of their software is fair game... hacking? I wasn't going to do jail time for them and refused.

      Fair game? Information on websites and in demo versions are protected by copyrights, again exposing you, the person committing the illegal acts, to liability. All a company has to do is say, 'What, huh, we didn't tell him to do that', and you'll end up twisting in the wind.

      Even if these acts that company was telling you to do weren't illegal, they're definitely unethical. My company holds high standards of ethics. We don't do things like sell customers equipment that we wouldn't stand behind, or undercut competitors to get business and then put customers over a single-vendor barrel. We act with our customers interests first - and I'm not sure that a lot of our customers understand that, actually. :)

      Lastly, if you are actually working at a company that has hundreds of unlicensed copies of software, you can put them out of business with a single phone call. Heck, you can report it online. bsa.org/reportpiracy. And if your employers don't realize how much power that gives you, they've got their head in the sand.

      I believe the 'standard' rate of fines from the BSA for unlicensed copies of software is four times the value of each license. Not just each copy of the software - each license. So if you're running a Win2k server in per-server mode, and you have a hundred clients connecting to it, that's one hundred client-access licenses you'll get fined for, at four times the value per license. Think that might make a dent in this quarter's budget?

    104. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by InspectorPraline · · Score: 1

      There's a key word up there that you are missing.

      WILLFUL.

      IANAL, but being ordered to do something illegal under threat of duress would not generally be considered a "willful" action.

      However:

      The OP has a responsibility to report their employer for such things; and if the employer is corrupt enough to threaten his job, he needs to leave. And -then- report the employer, when they are in less of a position to affect him.

      Although, there's certainly a strong case for just leaving, because many companies are notorious for not looking too fondly on hiring a known whistleblower.

    105. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by GRJenkins · · Score: 1

      Don't use the email system but simply create a "Release of Liability" letter for your supervisor to sign. Without using derogatory wording, state that you've been asked to perform duties circumventing current software licensing policies and that you are not to be held liable (even state examples). That way, if they sign it, you will not be held accountable for their inappropriate actions. Document each time they've asked you to install illegal copies of software and make sure you keep this record off-site (CYA). Should the software police show up, you can plead your case with a body of evidence. Should your employer fire you, you can use this evidence against them -- depending on why you were fired. Should they use common sense and agree that illegal installs are bad and ask you to rectify the problem, then it's a win win situation for you and your company.

      --
      Help, I'm trapped in a carbon-based life form.
    106. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Either he must abandon his principles and break the law, or he must stick to his principles, which means not following the instructions of his immediate superiors. Practically, this usually means quitting.
      Did you read this part? I am not invoking the fallacy, I am legitimately using the law of the excluded middle. Either he must abandon his principles or he must stick to his principles. This is rather obviously A or not-A, because sticking to his principles is directly the negation of abandoning his principles. Abandoning his principles means breaking the law. Sticking to his principles means not following the instructions of his immediate superiors. Not following the instructions of his immediate superiors will usually result in loss of his job. Please note well that I was very careful to qualify the statement I made about quitting; I said usually, not always, and I stated plainly that quitting was a practical, as opposed to logical, conclusion. So, no, I am not using the fallacy, nor am I saying "Abandon your principles or quit!", nor am I admitting to using the fallacy (because I haven't). I am saying "Abandon your principles or (probably) quit, although it is true that occasionally it works out to where you don't have to quit to stick to your principles in a situation like this!". There is a big difference here, and you need to pay better attention to big differences like this one.
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    107. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      The Netherlands. Pretty standard, unless you threaten with violence and stuff, or endanger the corporation. A months term to resign, and the months pay per worked year otherwise.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    108. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Keep a copy at home in case heck brakes loose. You've then covered your arse and the decision is up to them.

      You're covered if you don't care about committing criminal acts for money. Some people care about those sorts of things. I've quit two jobs so far due to such pressures. It sucks, but you can live with yourself.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    109. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Yes, something like that will work as well. I did not say that they should send the original email, in fact I specifically said it needed to be cleaned up.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    110. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. by dougmc · · Score: 1

      In all the areas that matter (compatibility, price), it is.
      Price, that's a given.

      Compatibility, no way. Consider that 95% of what you need to be compatible with is MS Office, what difference does it make if OO can read more formats? (and can it? I'm not so sure.) What matters is that MS Office is better at reading that 95% than OO is.

      At work, I'm a Linux user in an ocean of Windows users. 90% of the stuff that's sent to me, I can read reasonably well -- sometimes (50% ?) fonts and formatting are messed up, but most of the time it's usable. But the rest of the time, I've got to find a Windows box to view thing stuff on -- or not view it at all (haven't fought with Wine to make it work.) And on the occasions that office documents are sent out of the company, or come in from other companies ... 99+% of the time, they're in MS Office format.

      Fair or not, MS Office wins the compatibility argument. It's not really fair that what it has to be compatible with itself, but that's the way things have worked out. Any new Office-type softwares that appear have to be able to read and write MS Office files, and not the other way around.

      In the areas you're thinking of (functionality, user interface, performance), it's a toss-up.
      No way. MS Office has OO beat pretty soundly there. Even performance, which is surprising.


      If you're not willing/able to spend any money, and still want to be legal, OO wins handily. But the post that I was responding to was claiming that MS Office was `the worst', and it's not -- the only places where OO wins is platform compatibility and price.

  28. A few options: by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. Threaten to quit if they don't comply.

    2. Quit.

    3. Mention that penalties for pirating software are more expensive than buying it in the first place.

    4. Install Open Office instead, see if people notice.

    5. Threaten to inform Microsoft/BSA.

    6. Draft your letter to the company owners, but instead talk about how 'Open Office saves money' without mentioning your PHB's stupid plan to pirate Windows.

    7. Go over your bosses's head and tell the owners what he's up to.

    I'm sure other people will give you options as well. You obviously have principles, don't let your work overrule them.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
    1. Re: A few options: by quakehead3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      $ delete boss delete: cannot remove 'boss': Permission denied $ sudo delete boss boss removed

    2. Re:A few options: by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      I'd nix #2. Try to get the order to do this install in writing, if they're stupid enough to do that. With luck, you've already had email on the subject. If not, email your boss in a civil way about your "concerns" over the installation he ordered of unlicensed software. If he replies, you've got it. Print it and save it at home. On your own, document everything said to you as soon as it's said, with dates and times.

      Then refuse to do it. Worst-case scenario is that they fire you. If they do, then you have an ironclad wrongful dismissal case that any lawyer in that field would be happy to take up. Chances are they'll settle, if their own legal advice is competent, and since they have nothing to bargain with you'll probably do quite well.

      If they don't fire you, then get your CV out there ASAP. These are not people you want to be working for. They are not honest business people, and will screw you over the first time it yields them a short-term benefit just as they want to screw over their software vendors.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    3. Re:A few options: by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I agree with the post wholeheartedly. The option depends on how far poster wants to pursue the matter. But with your job and reputation on the line, is it really the best time to promote option #6? Who doesn't want to know about free. But there's likely retraining costs, document compatability problems, etc which might end up costing more.

      I would simply change option number 6 to: Other software may be avialble to suit your needs but compatability is not guaranteed.

    4. Re:A few options: by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1

      7. Go over your bosses's head and tell the owners what he's up to.

      Do it in writing, USPS, certified return receipt to two different persons if possible (forces accountability) and make notes and copies of everything for yourself.

    5. Re: A few options: by Silver+Gryphon · · Score: 1

      In Vista:

      You are about to embark on a new career path.
                              Cancel or Allow?

  29. or "Would you say anything?" by acroyear · · Score: 1

    As in, would you say anything if your work was installing unlicensed software on boxes? I know by "pirated" they usually refer to the big things, like Windows itself or MS Office.

    But really, the place where things are problematic is "nag-ware" items that don't actually remove their features if you don't pay in time, like WinZip and TextPad. Lots of companies simply keep quiet at those things being on every box on site, unpaid.

    Now, I get around that by using free (if old and unmaintained) software like ZipCentral and Crimson Editor, but not everybody feels that way.

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
    1. Re:or "Would you say anything?" by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now, I get around that by using free (if old and unmaintained) software like ZipCentral and Crimson Editor, but not everybody feels that way.

      Are you aware that 7-Zip has a file manager mode that does the same kind of crap as winzip and winrar?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:or "Would you say anything?" by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      >>Now, I get around that by using free (if old and unmaintained) software like ZipCentral and >>Crimson Editor, but not everybody feels that way.
      You can get something better than that. In my company, the IT manager has just replaced all the expired trial copies of Winzip and TextPad with 7zip and Notepad++ (both are OSS). Better quality than the sharewares IMO.

  30. hmm by tsalaroth · · Score: 1

    The hard answer:

    Turn them in if they insist on this action, even IF they "logged your disagreement" or whatever. Most states have laws protecting "whistle blowers", so you may well NOT lose your job (if you even want to keep it). Even the US military has some protections for someone who refuses an order because they think (or know) it's illegal.

    My reasoning for this has already been stated - if they DO get caught, you're likely to be the person blamed for it, as you're the one doing the actual installation.

    Anecdotal:
    I was asked to do something I thought was illegal at one time, and I refused, stating plainly that I wouldn't break the law, even if it meant my job.

    I got a raise.

    1. Re:hmm by CokeBear · · Score: 1

      Interesting anecdote. Did you get a raise because they were testing you and then rewarded your honesty, or did you get a raise because they knew you would squeal if you left, and wanted to keep you around to keep you quiet?

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    2. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably neither - perhaps his boss hadn't known it was illegal? Or something more sinister?

      tinfoilhat
      It turns out his boss was a spook. Old school. Remembered the days of the OSS. It turns out that the employee's stance was so "radical" and "forward-thinking" the employer decided to observe him further, to see if he was worth "recruiting". Turns out he was apparently a rabid liberal, so was not suited for the "craft".

      So now, the former (current?) employer waits for the "right moment" to "terminate" the "relationship". /tinfoilhat

    3. Re:hmm by tsalaroth · · Score: 1

      At first I thought it was to keep me quiet - but after talking to my boss about it in the exit interview, he simply didn't know it was illegal, and my stance impressed him. Who coulda guessed?

  31. CYOA by grudgelord · · Score: 1

    In this case you are damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't. On one hand, if you do as directed you are not only committing an unlawful act but are compromising your own ethics. On the other, you are risking your livelihood or at the very least your vocational bliss by introducing friction within the workplace and risk being branded a "boat rocker". So what's a guy or gal to do?

    If your ideals don't outweigh your desire to eat or your career ambitions I'd recommend a nice typewritten statement regarding situation and your disagreement with the actions taken. In this statement be cautious about making accusations (somewhat unavoidable but try to tone it down if possible) and attempt to keep the tone as neutral and matter-of fact as possible. Have HR or personnel add this statement to your file in the event this ever comes back to haunt you. There is no need to distribute this letter all over the office or to the various levels of management, just have it placed in your file (and possibly your immediate supervisor; though consider this carefully as it could cause more harm than good) as a defense against reprisal should the hammer ever fall and the company decides to offer you up as a scapegoat.

    The objective here is not to accuse anyone of anything or to pass an ethical judgment. You are merely saying, "I performed this assignment under protest for such-and-such reasons". While unlikely, should the situation turn ugly you can declare absolution.

    --
    "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0"
  32. Thin Clients by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you already have a Windows Server in place, consider installing Citrix as a simple applications server and letting most users access a single copy of MS Office installed on the apps server rather than giving each and every one of them their own installation. It's almost certainly a less-expensive (and still legal) solution than buying enough Office licenses for every desktop and, assuming reasonable usage patterns, should provide a good end-user experience.

    It is not acceptable, as an alleged professional, to willingly or by policy violate the laws of where your business is located.

    I know it sounds like a pain, but you should stand up for your professional ethics. If they are crazy enough to fire you for refusing to break the law, you should deal with the wrongful termination appropriately. As a refresher, our professional ethics are well summarized HERE.

    If they asked you to go out in the parking lot and siphon gas from random cars rather than submit a travel reimbursement because the "budget is tight", would you? Would you shoplift copies of the software from BestBuy for them?

    Write up a small presentation listing the various options and their costs and drawbacks:

    • Full licenses for all desktops
    • Full licenses for power users and a citrix server
    • Full licenses for power users and openoffice for others
    • Google Documents

    Illegal options aren't really options and should be neither offered nor considered.

    1. Re:Thin Clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Office is licensed on a per device basis. In this scenario, you need an Office license for each machine which is accessing the Citrix server. There are no cost savings.

    2. Re:Thin Clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is a nice idea but completely illegal. The office license is per each concurrent user on Citrix, since you have to install a terminal services version. Plus with citrix it costs more than a user license on office to buy the TSCAL, Citrix CAL, and windows CAL (last I checked it was $300 or so for citrix, $100 for windows, and $20 or so for the TSCAL).

    3. Re:Thin Clients by Samalie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With all due respect, you're an idiot. Legally, you need 1 copy of Office (or whatever, with VERY rare exceptions) per (at least) Concurrent User even if you are using Thin Clients. In the Case of Office, since everyone has Outlook open 24/7 you're screwed anyway. Citrix may ALLOW you to run 1 license of Office/whatever for everyone there, but that doesn't make it legal.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:Thin Clients by Darby · · Score: 0

      With all due respect, you're an idiot. Legally, you need 1 copy of Office (or whatever, with VERY rare exceptions) per (at least) Concurrent User even if you are using Thin Clients.

      Why would this be true? Merely because MS wants it to be so? Sorry, it doesn't work that way.

      Citrix may ALLOW you to run 1 license of Office/whatever for everyone there, but that doesn't make it legal.

      What praytell would make using a product you purchased for its intended purpose illegal? That doesn't even pass a basic sanity check.

    5. Re:Thin Clients by shumacher · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid the other poster is right. You need a license for each user. And it's so because the EULA says so. Have a look at it sometime. Also, the requisite Windows Server licenses, CALs, Citrix licenses, and terminal server hardware aren't cheap. A Citrix server costs money. Spend that money for the administrative benefits, not for the software license cost savings, because only the former actually exists.

    6. Re:Thin Clients by Jester998 · · Score: 1

      According to the terms of MS' license for Office, yes, you need one license per concurrent user, even in a Terminal Services/Citrix environment. (Nitpick: It's not 'illegal' to not be licensed, since it's not a felony, but rather you could be sued for civil damages) Things blur a little bit when you have a hybrid published-app/installed-on-local-workstation environment, but you still have to show due diligence.

      As for the second part -- the purpose of Citrix is not to violate licenses by allowing concurrent connections. Its purpose is centralized access AND MAINTENANCE of programs, as well as providing better efficiencies. Instead of updating software 1000 workstations, you update 20 (or 30, or whatever) Citrix servers. Instead of having clients query the database across the WAN/VPN (using up potentially a lot of bandwidth for the result sets), you let published apps do it from colocation, and then just push the visual results to the workstation. Another advantage of Citrix is that you can save quite a bit of capital expenditure by buying lower end desktop machines, since in a Citrix environment they're essentially just a dumb terminal... you don't need the latest and greatest to run it. Hell... we still have some offices running on Pentium-2 and -3's.

      We have a decently sized Citrix installation at work (~40 Citrix servers, over 1000 users), and yes, in most cases (e.g. Office), we demand proof of appropriate licensing for a user before we grant them access to the published app. There are some exceptions for programs which have their own licensing schemes (e.g. our accounting software has its own concurrent license management, as does our scheduling software), but on the whole we can show due diligence if we were ever audited (and we have been, by the way, from Microsoft, a few times in the past. We've passed with flying colors every time.)

      I completely disagree with this software 'licensing' bullshit, by the way. I use OpenBSD wherever I can. But as an IT professional, I will not knowingly expose my company to potential legal action, the costs of which would far outweigh the cost of complying with our license agreements.

    7. Re:Thin Clients by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, no. He's close to correct.

      Recent versions of Office explicitly address the Terminal Services environment and say that you have to "have" a separate MS Office license for every possible desktop that's used to access Office even occassionally. If someone logged in from home one day and fired up office remotely, MS says you need to buy another Office license. There's no way to actually install these licenses anywhere, but you're expected to have them.

      You also need a separate per-device TS-CAL and CAL for each connecting client.

      Where things can get confusing (and what we originally had set up) is where you have only one UNIX server that accesses the Terminal Server, where everyone runs their citrix clients and uses VNC or X redirection to view those somewhere else. Depending on what version of Office you have installed you might in this situation only have one "device", and you are allowed to have multiple users per device. Read your license agreements carefully, and bring aspirin.

    8. Re:Thin Clients by pavera · · Score: 1

      Wrong, you still need a full Office license for every user on a thin client app server.

      If the BSA showed up and you had 1 office CD and everyone using it through RDP or Citrix, you would be fined just the same as if you had that CD installed on all machines

    9. Re:Thin Clients by Darby · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid the other poster is right. You need a license for each user. And it's so because the EULA says so. Have a look at it sometime.

      That's only true if 100% of the EULA is actually legally binding, which seems very unlikely, but for sure is in no way certain.
      That was really my point that just because MS says something is true doesn't mean it is.

    10. Re:Thin Clients by Darby · · Score: 1

      ecent versions of Office explicitly address the Terminal Services environment and say that you have to "have" a separate MS Office license for every possible desktop that's used to access Office even occassionally.

      Says MS. There is no legal basis for considering their nonsense EULA to be in any way meaningful.
      If you've signed a contract, well different story, but just automatically claiming that any ridiculous nonsense whatsoever that MS chooses to put in their garbage EULA is somehow magically legally binding...or even legal for that matter is just silly.


      You also need a separate per-device TS-CAL and CAL for each connecting client.


      Why would you *ever* conceivable need a CAL for anything? That one is just pure nonsense.
      If they sell you a server OS, then it *by definition* means that it will serve clients. If you need to additionally by a license to access the server, then *it isn't a server, is it?*

      That's a simple case of false advertising.

      Read your license agreements carefully, and bring aspirin.

      And then wipe your ass with them for that is all the worth they have.
      One party can not arbitrarily add conditions *after a sale*.

      It's sad that so many people think that MS (or any organization for that matter) magically acquired the right to do all of this clearly illegal and nonsensical crap.

      How come If I told you that you owe me $100 you'd show some basic common sense and tell me to fuck off, but just because a major criminal organization does it you drop your pants, bend right over nad start trying to push lube on everyone else?

  33. Unfortunatly.. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I sometimes find it so frustrating to get all the security hasps and serials registered, getting techsupport from the east coast when your on the west coast, that can take days to setup if you don't get it right by noon. That sometimes it's just plain easier to run a crack and have it set up in 5 minutes.

  34. Refuse by zx75 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a hard path, and I know someone who has walked it. I have a cousin who was in the same situation and was fired for refusing to perform those illegal acts.
    If you are in your grace period, they can terminate you without giving a reason, but if you've been employed for some time they cannot legally fire you for refusing to perform an illegal act.

    In the end, my cousin didn't get anything out of it. He had to find another job (and did) but he did have the satisfaction of seeing the company get busted for unrelated illegal actions, which were then compounded when the illegal software was discovered.

    To this day, even though it was tough being forced to find a new job, he is glad that he took a stand against it... and I'll be the first to admit that I admire him for it.

    --
    This is not a sig.
    1. Re:Refuse by faloi · · Score: 1

      If you are in your grace period, they can terminate you without giving a reason, but if you've been employed for some time they cannot legally fire you for refusing to perform an illegal act.

      YMMV. In some states, you can technically be fired for any reason at any time, regardless of circumstances. If you can prove some kind of discriminatory or hostile workplace kinds of claims, you have some recourse for litigation. But if it's not documented, there's nothing to stop a company from firing people for no reason.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Refuse by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I have a cousin who was in the same situation and was fired for refusing to perform those illegal acts.

      I trust he contacted the BSA and Microsoft a few months later?

      The way I see it, the company would have to be really dumb to fire someone for refusing to install pirated software.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    3. Re:Refuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they cannot legally fire you for refusing to perform an illegal act.

      That doesn't matter - they'll fire you for some other trumped up charge, like a "bad fit".

    4. Re:Refuse by ziggr · · Score: 1
      I'll be the first to admit that I admire him for it.

      Yep. Too bad the bank won't accept admiration in lieu of a mortgage payment.

      Find a better job, then quit.

  35. Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They asked you to violate the law and your own ethics, you gave them perfectly reasonable alternatives that would cost them nothing, and they still overruled you.

    Tell me again why you are so attached to this job?

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by stinerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably because the guy needs to eat.

      Not all of us live in a perfect fantasy land where we can just quit jobs that offend our ethics. The guy probably has a family to support. Having to take care of other people lessens your ability to stand on principle.

    2. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not all of us live in a perfect fantasy land where we can just quit jobs that offend our ethics. THANK YOU!
      That's why I work for the mob.
      Good to see that there are still people out there that understand.

      Gotta go whack somebody now. See you later...
    3. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me again why you are so attached to this job?

      Hot women!

    4. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by jmac1492 · · Score: 1

      That's why I work for the mob.
      You work for the RIAA? No wonder you're posting AC.
      --
      Jenny's got a new number! 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    5. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by lorcha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never said he had to just walk out the front door in a huff. I merely asked a question.

      He said he wanted to keep the job. I asked why he was so attached.

      I think it's a perfectly valid question. It's not like there aren't other jobs out there.

      Again, no one said he had to leave before he had something else lined up, so relax my friend.

      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    6. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of us live in a perfect fantasy land where we can just quit jobs that offend our ethics.
      I doubt this guy is at or near the poverty line. Most professionals, even with families, have enough discretionary income to build up savings for situations like this. The issue is that, in our culture, we buy homes, cars, TV's, etc. before we think to save or invest. I'm not saying that the poser is in this boat, but I'm just saying that it's not a perfect fantasy land, it's our great economy that allows us to quit our jobs if need be.

    7. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by nametaken · · Score: 1

      I don't think the answer HAS to be so dramatic as "F-you, I quit... and wait to hear from my lawyers."

      I think I'd want this conversation to go something like:

      BOSS: "Meh, install office anyways."
      ME: "I can't."
      BOSS: "Why not?"
      ME: "It's criminal copyright infringement. I don't want to go to jail... would you?"
      BOSS: "You're not going to go to jail."
      ME: "If you fire Bob over there and he calls the 800 number, _I_ go to jail. I don't want to go to jail."
      BOSS: "This licensing thing is a bunch of bullshit."
      ME: "I know man, it's a pain in my ass too. But it's Microsoft... what are you gunna do?"
      BOSS: "Alright well, what's the other office thing you were talking about?"
      ME: "OpenOffice. It's like Sun Microsystem's version of office. It's the software I've had Sally over there using for a month and she hasn't noticed it's not Microsoft Office yet."
      BOSS: "And it's free? Why is it free?"
      ME: "Sun competes with Microsoft and it's good PR for them to give away a full professional Office suite that rivals Microsofts. It's also what they call 'open source', so thousands of people work on it all the time adding features and making sure it's competitive with Microsoft's Office. Right now it's _the_ alternative. It'll actually even read and write in Microsoft's formats pretty well. It has its own Word, PowerPoint, Excel, and some other stuff."
      BOSS: "Give it to Bill and John too, see what they think."
      ME: "Cool. I'll take care of it tonight and send you an email when it's done."

      Of course, there's always the argument that it's horribly irresponsible to be in a position where you HAVE to break the law to be able to feed your family, but I think a calm conversation like this is probably both most likely, and mutually beneficial. And before someone bitches... the part about Sun and OpenOffice is largely to name-drop Sun Microsystems, because people's biggest concern with OpenOffice seems to be that they're concerned it's some bogus shareware knock-off of Office. If you throw in the bit about Sun, and say they love busting MS's chops by releasing a full, professional version of office, it seems to fly better with people. They think they're sticking it to Microsoft in a clever way... and feel wickedly in-the-know. Later they can BS with their manager over dinner about how the IT guy told them about this really nice Office package that has no licensing fees because of a longstanding industry rivalry, and how he was insightful enough to leverage it for the companies benefit... and how if it doesn't work out, hopefully we'll have the capital to license up on the MS one down the road.

      The only thing you have to worry about is when they start to notice that its Microsoft Office compatibility is not perfect. At that point you have to be ready to remind them that it's a small inconvenience when compared to the $500 per seat you'd have to spend to avoid it.

      Oh, that and the whole thing goes to shit if you're using Exchange.

    8. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're the guy who wrote all those evangelical story books!

    9. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I've got news for you. Failure to adequately plan your finances doesn't excuse you from adequately planning your finances. Tell me how it is that there are people who raise families of 4 on $30K per year and are still able to save money (I have a good friend in this very situation) while others make twice that and don't have two nickels to rub together?

      Seriously, there is something wrong with you if you cannot put 10-20% of your income away for a rainy day.

    10. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, not standing by his ethics and installing that pirated software also endangers his ability to continue eating, e.g. when he gets blamed for installing all of the pirated software which ended up on the company computers somehow. The issue is "long-term survival" vs. "short-term survival", not "surviving" vs. "not surviving".

    11. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the mortgages these people have? They're probably 2 months from being broke the way they live. I left the rat race, but most everyone I know who is a company boy would be in deep trouble if they missed more than 3-4 paychecks. 4 years ago I would have, too.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    12. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by TilJ · · Score: 1

      short term thinking. If you'd kept going with your argument, it does actually get you somewhere useful. I imagine he'll want to eat next year too. That might be more difficult with a criminal conviction.

      Looking for work when you're in control of the timing and have a clean nose is vastly preferable in the putting-food-on-the-table sense than doing it when the timing is controlled by the courts and nobody wants you for anything more than washing dishes.

      --
      "The purpose of argument is to change the nature of truth." -- Bene Gesserit Precept
    13. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because the guy needs to eat.

      So his only choices are to do this job, or starve to death?

      Are you claiming his only job qualification is installing illegal copies of software?

    14. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by nametaken · · Score: 1

      No, I just have a tendency to think out how I want a conversation to go before I have it, even if I'm pretending I'm in someone else's shoes. :)

      My workplace can afford the MS Office licenses, and so I've installed O2k7 on everyone's workstation... because honestly, it's better than OpenOffice. It's just that OOo makes a decent replacement if you can't afford MS and don't want to go to jail.

    15. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're missing the point of attempting to make a move to open source software.

      Your company is directly funding worldwide MS extortion.

    16. Re:Why do you want to keep the job so badly? by nametaken · · Score: 1


      Not so much. It has more to do with who has the best product then a preference for one co or the other. Right now, for a number of reasons, the best office suite in the world comes from Microsoft, and we can afford to buy it, so we do. Most businesses don't care about the OSS fanboy BS, they just want the job done the best way possible.

  36. Depends by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    on who's asking, is that yo BSA ?

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  37. Which is the lesser of two slashdots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except when the majority is violating the law. Then it's OK.

    1. Re:Which is the lesser of two slashdots? by Ynsats · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The question that your statement begs is if the law is being violated by the majority, is it a just law?

      This is the logic your mom used in that "If everyone else jumped off of a bridge, would you do it too?"

      Just because everyone is doing it doesn't make it right. Then again, just because it is law, that doesn't necessarily make it right either. The only thing that can be taken from your statement is that if the majority is breaking the law then the validity, justness or application of the law to modern times needs to be revisited.

      Copyright laws are meant to protect the rights of the intellectual property rights holder. Not necessarily the creator of that intellectual property, hence the RIAA.

      If a software company is charging what the market believes is too much for software then the market adjusts itself by offering a better solution at a better price. Hence OpenOffice.

      The black market in illegally traded software cannot be held up as a moral barometer to the current market and trends. The black market exists to undermine the establishment and is not in the best interests of open commerce. It will always exist no matter how just the laws that govern the market are. In addition, many proponents of teh black market support the poor behavior in the name of open software sources and standards. Which, in itself, is a fallacy.

      That said, pirating software is flat out illegal. License agreements are put in place to protect rights that everyone has the right to protect. What makes pirating software wrong is that you are violating that license agreement that is meant to protect the intellectual property owner's rights. If you violate the agreement, you violate the rights of the owner because you take away thier control of thier intelletual property. When you violate rights outlined by something like, say, the U.S. Constitution, you are depriving someone else of thier rights and freedoms. That is a civil crime and punishable by the justice system established in this country.

      If you feel that the law is unjust because "everyone is doing it" then, violating the law is not going to change it. Petitioning your elected officials in Congress will...provided you can get enough of that supposed "majority" to sign a paper saying that the law needs to be revisited and then voted on. Then again, there is a such thing as organized defiance of a law but it doesn't really apply to software piracy. Mainly because you are using that pirated software to your benefit. There can most likely be a monetary value associated with that benefit. If you are profiting off of that benefit and hoooo boy are you in for a doozie of a lawsuit! See, if you are benefitting from someone else's work/property, it's really difficult to claim some sort of organized definance of an "unjust" law.

    2. Re:Which is the lesser of two slashdots? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      The question that your statement begs is if the law is being violated by the majority, is it a just law?

      The law is supposed to represent the will of its subjects. If the letter of the law is being violated by the majority, it is an illegitimate law and should be repealed.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    3. Re:Which is the lesser of two slashdots? by gobbo · · Score: 1

      The law is supposed to represent the will of its subjects. If the letter of the law is being violated by the majority, it is an illegitimate law and should be repealed.

      Sure, but not always. Sometimes laws that are regularly broken but not always enforced are good to have as a fallback. Assault, for instance: no need to call the cops over every little scuffle. The will of the law's subjects is usually very complex, and the line of illegality can be fuzzy.

    4. Re:Which is the lesser of two slashdots? by Kjella · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The question that your statement begs is if the law is being violated by the majority, is it a just law?

      This is the logic your mom used in that "If everyone else jumped off of a bridge, would you do it too?"

      Just because everyone is doing it doesn't make it right.(...)
      Except that the logic is fatally flawed. You're trying to prove that always going with the majority is wrong/stupid. Your reasoning:
      1. Assume the majority will do something wrong/stupid
      2. Assume that you will do what's right/smart
      3. Force the conclusion that you would act differently than the majority
      Except of course, that you put the conclusion in the assumption. What if they're exactly like you, then they would never do anything wrong/stupid either and you'd always be in agreement, and always do the right/smart thing. I certainly don't see people jumping off bridges, maybe there's a reason for that? I never thought that mom's logic worked on anyone past elementary school.

      there is a such thing as organized defiance of a law but it doesn't really apply to software piracy. Mainly because you are using that pirated software to your benefit.
      Is a bunch of people smoking pot (I don't mean in a protest march) organizaed defiance? Hell no, most people smoke it for their own pleasure and couldn't care less about making any sort of "stand". But mass individual disobedience of the law is a real protest, it is sending a mesage that "this law isn't worth respecting" even if they're not taking to the streets.

      Finally, I think there's one thing that's not taken properly into account. What does it take to enforce the law? What's the price of freedom that we pay? I don't think anyone will argue that they're for terrorists. But I think most will argue against some 1984ish state where the state sees everything, car tracking, credit card tracking, random search and seizures at home and in public, random opening of letters, general wiretapping even though I'm sure it could somehow be used to catch terrorists. I'm sure digicams are a boon to child porn producers. But if you ask people if they'd rather all their pictures were encrypted on camera and had to be presented to a government board for legality first before release, they wouldn't even though it'd probably help fight it.

      Yes, I do see a value in copyright as the founding fathers did. But I also see that to protect copyright in todays digital society where massive and exact reproduction can happen in every home, you need to cripple everything. You need to cripple computers, you need to cripple the Internet, you need to cripple media through taxes, you need to cripple innovation in communication, you need to restrain free speech regarding DRM implementations and so on. That hampers the progress of science and the useful arts rather than promote it, and you don't get a fair picture without taking it into account.

      Let's say there a million songs made because of copyright, that a million each listened to at 10$/album. If we abolished it, and there was a hundred thousand songs (idealists, promos, sponsored, subsidized, whatever) but a hundred million listened to it for free, which is really the greater benefit? People have been painters, singers, dancers and storytellers far longer than there has been photocopiers, phonographs, films and books. We haven't seen much because they were performing arts or unique works, but if we could have preserved it, replicated it and shared it we'd have in abundance. There's this great illusion that the world would become a cultural wasteland without the big industry, which just isn't true. So again - how much are they helping, how much are they hurting and is it *worth* it? I don't think the answer is that clear cut.
      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Which is the lesser of two slashdots? by Ynsats · · Score: 1

      The logic is not fatally flawed and you are committing a straw man.

      My point was, the laws of this country state that the infingement of copyright laws is a deprivation of freedoms and rights afforded to the owner of the copyright. The argument concerning mom and her statement about bridges and jumping illustrates the point very well. It essentially states that just because the majority violates the law, that does not make it acceptable to violate the law. Whether you look at it from a moral/ethical standpoint or a legal standpoint, a law is put there to maintain an assemblance of order. If the law is broken, there is no order.

      You state that the reasons the law should be taken off the books is because it is not enforcable and thusly unjust. Yet you have not given any point or proof that shows that the law is unjust. The only thing you have stated so far is that you don't get to have free access to the results of somebody else's hard work, therefore it is an unjust law. You neglect to consider who the laws were made for, the intellectual property holder.

      Just because the law is not enforcable does not mean it is not useful. It is very difficult to enforce the law. Enforcing the law should not include crippling electronics in homes and businesses. That is a deprivation of freedom. The actions being taken by the RIAA are bastardizing the law in an effort to increase/protect profits. The laws still have merit because it provides recourse for an intellectual property holder to prosecute someone who has violated their rights to their work. Without that avenue for justice, what should an artist do if someone obtains a copy of their work and starts selling it on the street outside of a concert venue? What recourse would the artist have when someone copies his hard work and profits from it without paying royalties? There is no easy answer. Without the copyright laws, there is no basis for a case. Sure, the artist could sue but without laws, it is open to interpretation of a judge/jury. He could attack the man but then, there are laws in place to deter that. Then again, there are also laws in place concerning theft of property.

      So the copyright laws are just and it is difficult to prosecute a person who has copied media as a criminal for theft of intellectual property. It is difficult to prosecute because guilt needs to be proven and there is very little concrete evidence to put someone away for stealing intellectual propety. There are also too many legal loopholes to show reasonable doubt and that's all that is needed for someone to get away with a crime. With the copyright law in place, there is legal recourse because the only concrete evidence needed is the actual copies of the work. If that exists and they are not authorized copies, the law is violated and a criminal proceeding can ensue.

      I'm sorry but in this case, Mom's logic does apply because the needs of the majority do not outweigh the needs of the one. Afterall, when you go to work, you use your knowledge and skills to provide solutions to your company so that they can be profitable. You in turn get paid for your hard work. You chose your profession. So did the copyright holders. Are they not entitled to see gains for thier hardwork also? Do they have to live in a box on the street corner just because you didn't want to buy a CD or a piece of software? Your whole argument is based on fainess and justice. How is that situation fair or just?

  38. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We setup a department at an EDU. We got requests for MS Office in the beginning. We had _1_ license. I said it'd be installed on one machine & that someone who wanted it on another machine could purchase a license. The installation media were kept in a public place & some people installed it on their personal machines. That's fine--plausible deniability. I took no part in it. After a few months, people liked OO.o and Gnumeric as alternatives.

    Further: a vendor was using the GPLed version of MySQL in a proprietary app. We badgered to open the source or pay MySQL for the commercial version. They did the latter.

    Being ordered to breach ethics sucks. Being ordered to break the law sucks more. And when that order does not come with a signed and notarized get out of jail free card, it is easy to say "hell no." You won't be fired--if they had the balls to do that, they'll be taking the shit they'd get if they took responsibility for the illegal action in the first place.

  39. Ask for a written order by haeger · · Score: 1
    I've found out that asking for a written order is quite effective. If it's a legit thing they want me do to it's never a problem and if not then, well let's just say that managers don't want to put their name on a piece of paper (or email) asking you to do something shady.

    Something akin to these lines.

    "Hi.
    I understand what you want me to do but since this violates my personal ethics/religion/dietary requirements I would like you to confirm that this action is what you want me to take".

    .haeger

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
  40. Short version: no. by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    When I first started in the industry, I was 18, working at a small company, and the licensing status of our software was uncertain with no records, but piles and piles of physical copies of the software we used. It is possible we exceeded our site license (if applicable?) but I figured it was up to the company to watch - I was just a tech.

    Now I work at a local college, and I wouldn't even use my personal workstation to download something pirated for use at home. Work just isn't the place for pirated software. It would also be pretty stupid of a company to fire you for not breaking the law for them, though I realize they'd probably have an excuse...

    So ultimately, no. Never pirate software at work. If you decide to do so at work or at home, be prepared to take full responsibility for it - and that means a lot more than getting around to paying retail price when they catch you!

  41. I must be the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    I guess I must be the only one who ever worked for an unscrupulous employer who reads Slashdot, but the bulk of the replies here amaze me! There are certain things I'd quit my job over, some that would just keep me up at night, and some I'd do out of hand knowing that it was my only choice. Sure, if they insisted I sacrifice a virgin on some pagan alter, I'd bail immediately. Or if they wanted me to set them up a kiddie-porn site for their personal collections. Or if they voted Democrat (just kidding...) But software piracy isn't one of those 'quit immediately' type of things for me. Sure it's a 'polish your resume' event, but that's about it.

    I'm posting this AC because it doesn't reflect on my current employer and I have no desire to 'out' the previous one except where it suits me. :)

    1. Re:I must be the only one... by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      I am also perplexed. 1) The software in question is by microsoft, the most hated of hated. 2) Theres no real threat of anything bad ever comming of it. Definitely not a ticking time bomb ethical delima here... 3) Ive never worked at a business that didnt have at least some pirated software. Its hard to believe that most people haven't. 4) If this was an article about a communal mp3 server I find it hard to believe most people would back the RIAA. 5) MS has said repeatidly that they would rather you pirate their software than use a competitors product. Other companies hold this view as well like adobe.

      Sure its a corporation, and not an individual doing the infringing, but could that be it? Is it really so different from the kid who installs photoshop in college so he can become a web developer? i guess most people think that corporations make loads of money so they should carry(make up for) all the casual pirates out there. To me this logic doesnt really fly. I really thought more people on slashdot were open to the idea of pirating software. A software is just a tool right? Shouldn't everyone be allowed free access to the tools that they need to create something of real value? Are people really behind the artifical scarcity of software resources/tools?

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    2. Re:I must be the only one... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Well, I usually disagree with you (and you with me apparently by your "freak status" but you gave me an idea:

      "dear MS, my company can not afford enough licenses for office for our entire staff. We will be switching to OOo shortly, unless you would prefer to license office for $xx.xx per copy. Thanks, IT guy"

      See what happens?
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:I must be the only one... by Shados · · Score: 1

      I don't think the average slashdotter would think that far, but the way I see it is: the rules that protect Microsoft's copyrights, are the same rules that make the GPL valid: in other words, the person with the copyright can make the rules (to some extent).

      Cracking MS Office, or using GPLed code in a shrink wrapped closed source software... in the end, its the same thing, protected by more or less the same laws at the core (decorated by a bunch of different ones, but the core ones are the same, is what I mean).

      So a smart slashdotter would be against software piracy, if they value the rules in their favorite licenses.

    4. Re:I must be the only one... by petrus4 · · Score: 1

      I am also perplexed. 1) The software in question is by microsoft, the most hated of hated. 2) Theres no real threat of anything bad ever comming of it. Definitely not a ticking time bomb ethical delima here...

      Maybe you're unfamiliar with how Microsoft treats companies when they find out that said companies have been pirating Microsoft's software.

      This isn't a question of the average Slashbot not hating Microsoft. If you're living in a situation with a tyrant, although you might hate his guts you'll also realise that there are times when you need to tiptoe around him because he has the ability to do some very nasty things to you if you don't. Fear is actually a primary motivation behind hatred in most instances.

      What I've also seen some posters advocate is moving the company to OpenOffice, ASAP. Since I'm thankfully not in a position where I need to use office software at all, I haven't actually used OO.org; however, being able to use ANY office software that lets a company do what they need to, while eliminating both costs and the risk of a lawsuit is worth it.

    5. Re:I must be the only one... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Sure its a corporation, and not an individual doing the infringing, but could that be it?

      the problem being that you can be held legally liable for it. it is extremely unlikely that the people currently telling you to do this will not hesitate to hang you out to dry if/when the shit hits the fan. that means lawsuits, potential criminal charges, and the resulting trashed reputation.

      as for your other points:

      1. so? this isn't a microsoft vs. everyone else thing. this is a legal issue.

      2. depends. a relatively small company starts on this path, then 5 years down the road, they're not so small and have hundreds of non-licensed copies in use. the BSA decides they want their money. the board has the option of pay up or get hammered in court, and a sizable internal scandel develops, resulting in fingers pointing at you and you being foisted up in court. "this was never authorized by anyone. he is entirely responsible for it."

      3. yes, but if a small company starts it early on, it really tends to snowball, leading up to the previously mentioned senario.

      4. i wouldn't be backing the RIAA and no one i see is backing microsoft/BSA. they're concerned with not having their life completely (and possiblely irreperablely) fucked up if the BSA decides that they want their money.

      5. that would only apply to the small scale. if you're a hundred-million-dollar company with a lot of unlicensed software, they do not hesiate to go after you, as you're unlikely to go through the massive hassle of changing software, so they want their money.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    6. Re:I must be the only one... by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      Maybe its because im not an american, but I dont really believe in the BSA. I sware I remember reading that they are alot more hype than substance, even in the USA.

      I cant and wont live in fear. I like licensing, but if its honour thy M$ or pay the bills Ill pick pay the bills everytime.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    7. Re:I must be the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont like to bluff personally. Ooo is deployed all over my organization for people that just need word and BASIC spreadsheets with templates created in excel. The heads of most departments have outlook and excel. If theres an alternative for outlook and a PERFECT excel clone, I would switch everyone no problem. Outlook sucks ass, but thunderbird has no calander last I saw. I also dont like the fact that thunderbird doesnt read/view messages as they are selected. as in holding down shift and arrow key down. SO now I have to read every spam. Is there even a way to force read/recieve in plaintext only? Html is a sin in mail. Luckily where i do use thunderbird I have a refined spam strategy, but work would be a nightmare

    8. Re:I must be the only one... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      if you think the risk/return ratio is acceptable, go ahead. it's just that i personally feel that the risk in unacceptable for me.

      if i was being instructed to do that, i would be getting a union rep and/or my lawyer with me double-quick, as it is unquestionably illegal and i am not hanging my ass out so the company can save a few bucks.

      i'm not saying i don't acquire software without paying for it at home, but that's at home and i'm just one single user. they do not care about 1 guy, and, as you said, they would typically rather you steal theirs than use the competition's, but when you're talking tens/hundreds/thousands of licenses on a corporate level, it's a much bigger, juicier target.

      and just FTR, i'm not american either. i'm canadian.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  42. I've Been In That Situation A Few Times by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This problem is far more common than people think -- especially at smaller companies that are trying to make ends meet.

    What I did in one case was to comply with the order and then got the hell out. I needed the time to find another job. I didn't turn them in to SPA or anything but I sometimes wish I had after some wait long enough to not point the finger back at me.

    In another instance, I discovered that my predecessor had installed a bunch of copies of software without having the licenses (nowhere near) to cover the installations. I knew my supervisor was (a) a slimeball, and (b) short on money to cover the software. When I told him about the situation, he asked me to find out how much it would cost to make all the software legal so I did. It was too much for him to cover so he decided not to do anything about it.

    Not wanting to be associated with illegal software (I can't go into details, but this was a place with oversight and the consequences to being a party to this would mean immediate dismissal), and wanting to cover my butt, I talked to a company rep for the software and asked if there was a way to convert old licenses to new through some kind of upgrade, plus get a discount on a volume buy. I did this without my supervisor's knowledge or permission.

    I felt I had no choice. I did not see going to his supervisor as an option as I was relatively new and my supervisor had lots of friends. I did the only thing that I thought I could to cover myself. By contacting the company rep, I alerted the company that there was technically piracy going on with their software. I did it without authority, but I also covered the entity's butt I worked for by owning up to the software company and appearing to be proactive. I covered my organization's butt to our parent organization as we were subject to software audits -- which would have put us (and me) in an extreme corner. I also forced my supervisor to pony up for the illegal software. And I also documented dates, inventories, and anything to make my case just in case someone tried to blame me for the illegal copies.

    My supervisor, however, targeted me and cut my position at his very next opportunity and I had to take another position in the organization. Luckily it worked out for the better. He was also eventually targeted and demoted by his supervisor. Maybe I could have gone above him but I didn't know that at the time.

    It was a really tough position. I did what I felt I had to do to cover myself and the organization I work for and to force the hand of my supervisor who was quite content to operate with tens of thousands of dollars of illegal software. I had already been through the situation once and didn't feel like doing it again. It also really made me angry that someone would put me in that position when I am an IT professional. It just sucked. I have absolutely no respect for any supervisor who would do that to an employee and if placed in that position in the future, I would probably be even more open about cutting off their dick by documenting, buidling a case, and going as high as I needed to go to get the issue resolved. I realize that sometimes the supervisor is the CEO/director/whatever, and you can't go higher. In such cases I think all you can do is comply to buy time and get the hell out.

  43. Get it in writing. by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

    Tell your boss that you'll do it, but that want it in writing, signed by him, that you are to install those copies even though you do not believe you have enough licenses. If he wants to guarantee that you have the right number of licenses and that everything is legal, then fine.

    If he refuses to give you such a written request, don't do it. If he attempts to fire you, then you immediately go to his superior (or however high you need to go to get past the ones implicit in this decision), and tell them that you're being fired for refusing to do something illegal that would open the company to a lawsuit. Odds are, your boss is going to be the one fired, and you'll be asked to stay. If not, do you really want to work for a company that has no problem violating the law, and is willing to punish those who won't?

    1. Re:Get it in writing. by Falladir · · Score: 1

      (or however high you need to go to get past the ones implicit in this decision)

      I think you mean "complicit."

  44. BSA by eric76 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You might point out to them that all it takes is one disgruntled employee or ex-employee to make a complaint to the BSA (Business Software Alliance).

    There is a bright spot, however. After they pay a few hundred thousand dollars to the BSA, they may be more willing to switch completely to open source software.

  45. Russian Mafia - no choice! by mac1235 · · Score: 1

    I work for organized crime you insensitive clod!

  46. Good piece of advice by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    Get out of the licensing business, push that off on the accounting/purchasing people.

    When you put software on an image or distribute/install it, make sure that you have an email "paper trail" of your supervisor of member of management authorizing it. If somebody sends drugs to somebody in the mail, the mailman doesn't get busted for possession -- so you want to be a mailman.

    I say this because you a technical person, not a bean counter. Licensing is complicated, and difficult to handle correctly even when your company isn't trying to pirate software.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Good piece of advice by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Get out of the licensing business, push that off on the accounting/purchasing people.
      Best advice here.

      Actually, I'm assuming they bought at least 1 copy of Office and they're not downloading ISOs and keygens. That makes it a licensing dispute, not piracy. (I love EULAs sometimes).

  47. Linux smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This situation is much less likely to come up in my organisation since we run linux and a sort of thin-ish client environment.
    All workstations are identical, so peopel can log in anywhere. Not *all* our software is free of course, but it certainly simplifies the licensing for our non-free applications.

  48. if its microsoft then yes by crabpeople · · Score: 1

    Im sorry but microsoft has made it impossible using their monopoly position to NOT use office. Open offices spreadsheet is notoriously different than excel and most accountants will have no end of bitching till they get their precious excel back. Companies should be as legal as possible, but ultimately its a management decision and you have to put food on the table.

    I dont regard software piracy as that immoral though so I might be more nonchalant than you (its right around using pirated mp3s for your hold music imho, as in your not going to get caught and it doesnt hurt anyone). If the company mandated I install prayer screen savers onto every PC because they were ultra religious I might care more to stand up to it. The bottom line is if it offends you that much and you really think M$ is dying in the streets for cash, fight them. Stand up and quit if nessecary. I wouldn't advise narcing them out though. To me that would be the most immoral thing you could do. Petty revenge that.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  49. Do not make your boss sign a letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure why everyone is giving the advice to make your boss sign a letter accepting responsibility. That is the wrong thing to do. Regardless of whether he claims responsibility or not, by being involved in an illegal act and failing to report it, you become an accomplice. If it's ever found out, your boss may get fired, but so will you.

    Your only choice is to refuse to do it. They cannot fire you for that; it would be an invitation for a lawsuit in which you have a very strong position.

    1. Re:Do not make your boss sign a letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite a few of them are asking the boss to sign a statement that there are enough licenses.

  50. No license, no install by rbanzai · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would not install unlicensed software at work. If my boss insisted on it I would ask him to put it on paper with the specifics of the software name, the date, and that he knew we did not have a license. If he signs it taking full responsibility I'd go right ahead.

    Part of my job as I.T. Manager has been to make my boss aware of the liability of using pirated software, and of allowing employees to use pirating software like Limewire, etc. If they insist on doing things that expose them to liability it won't be because they didn't know it was a bad idea. :)

    1. Re:No license, no install by aminorex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would effectively protect you against legal action based on your deeds; however, misprison of a felony is also a crime, so that unless you inform the authorities of your boss' crime, you are still liable to legal action based on your boss' deeds.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  51. Consider talking to your own lawyer as well by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Consider hiring your own lawyer as well. If you find yourself laid off at the next opportunity or otherwise sidelined, you may need him if you want to sue your future-former employer.

    A word of caution: You probably signed a non-disclosure agreement. IANAL and I don't know if those will prevent you from talking to your own lawyer.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  52. It's not just you by jeremymiles · · Score: 1

    I'd be worried about other people. If someone who's using the software has a gripe against you / your boss / the company, it's very easy for THEM to report you to FAST or whatever. I've got a story about that, but I'd have to post as AC.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  53. Written order by Deternal · · Score: 1

    If something goes completely against my professional advice and someone wants me to do it, I insist on getting a signed order to do so.
    In that way, the executive giving the order takes full and complete responsibility and acknowledges that you are against this.

    I've had to do this twice - sadly both on security issues.

    In this case it would also make sense to make a list of currently owned (and version if relevant) licenses and missing/needed license purchases.
    Microsoft usually acknowledges that you can install the software as long as you can prove you've ordered it already, whereas IBM does not take this stance.

    1. Re:Written order by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      iirc one of the microsoft volume licenses (select i think) actually explicitly gives you a grace period between installing software and having to get licenses for it!

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  54. To commit a crime or not? by kosmosik · · Score: 1

    Well it is plain simple - refuse commiting a crime. Piracy is crime. Peroid. If your employer expects from you to commit a crime (or witness or whatever) it is your duty to refuse. If you don't have money for car you don't go steal one - similar here.

    This is not some minor issue as using a copy of some obscure cracked shareware for fifteen minutes to do some bizzare stuff which you need to do due to pression of time etc. (that I would tolerate). This is about serious and willingful piracy - using few copies of some expensive software without paying for it.

  55. Options by stinerman · · Score: 1

    From what it looks like, you have 3 options:

    1) Quit
    2) Turn them in
    3) Do something unethical

    I opt for 2, but that is what I'd do given my background and situation. I don't know if you have other obligations (family, debt, etc.) that effectively requires you to keep employment. In any case:

    Write to your immediate supervisor asking to put his directive in writing. Keep a hard copy of this directive at home. Ask what the penalty is for not installing the software. Try to get this in writing as well. Contact a lawyer and see what remedies the law gives a person in your situation. I would think (or at least hope) that someone who is directed by his employer to do something illegal would at least be able to keep their job if they told the authorities or, better yet, were able to get part any financial settlement coming out of deals.

    Of course, copyright infringement is a civil crime, so you can always go that route. Hell, give Microsoft a call or even the BSA. They might work out a deal with you.

    1. Re:Options by Gregg+Alan · · Score: 1

      From what it looks like, you have 3 options:

      1) Quit
      2) Turn them in


      Turn them in for what and to whom? Until the software has been installed no crime has been committed.

      Oh, sure, something about hiring a hitman or something... the company committed a crime by asking an employee to violate copyright.

      This is simply one of those "If you have to ask..." questions. This person is simply in over his or her head. Seriously, anyone coming to Slashdot to ask a question like this ABOUT THEIR JOB isn't qualified to hold the position that they do.

      BTW, this isn't directed at you stinerman, but I have read as far as I can stomach into this thread.

      -GA

      P.S. The correct answer is obvious: You don't install the software because that's your choice. You made the choice the instant you hesitated. Duh. What happens next is entirely out of your control. You'll probably be killed.

      --
      Here before all but 8486 of you.
  56. We need a patsy... by gillbates · · Score: 1

    I would never turn them in...

    I'm guessing that this is why they asked you. Maybe you should rethink your loyalties...

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  57. I suggest an immediate call to proper authorities by hummassa · · Score: 1

    This is the only real way to CYA: do what you're told, document it (video/sound recordings should do, depending on your jurisdiction) and call the cops. IANAL and TINLA.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  58. I guess what I wonder is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Has the submitter absolutely determined that they don't have the licenses, and for whatever reason they've chosen to send a guy around with a CD? Seems silly to pick a fight, however well meaning and potentially appropriate, over what might be a misunderstanding. Now if it's not a misunderstanding, obviously don't be a party to the crime, and report it. Then you can add a line on your resume about how you initiated a project which saved your company x dollars in liability, and stopped a manager from destroying and embarassing it.

    1. Re:I guess what I wonder is by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Then you can add a line on your resume about how you initiated a project which saved your company x dollars in liability, and stopped a manager from destroying and embarassing it.
      When I finally got my employer to start paying for software licenses instead of pirating it, I added an item to my resume under "accomplishments" that said pretty much the same thing. I didn't mention that it was a Senior VP that I saved the company from.
      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  59. Re:Ask Slashdot: How do I act on principle? by Lockejaw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And if it's not against your principles, you're choosing between hoping it will blow over, and covering your ass. In most cases, I prefer the CYA approach -- cover yours, not your bosses'.

    --
    (IANAL)
  60. BBY by Vexor · · Score: 1

    It wasn't all that long ago that Best Buy's Geek Squad came under fire for using a bunch of unlicensed software to do their jobs. I don't think anyone lost their jobs but I know Best Buy paid a very hefty fine. It's only so long before you're caught. I'd agree with the majority that it's best to take the moral stand and find new work ASAP.

    --
    ~Vexed and loving it!
  61. Now What? by superflat · · Score: 1

    I admit that I know nothing of copyright law so sorry if this sounds dumb. Can employees get screwed for using pirated software even if they had nothing to do it being installed in the first place?

  62. Quit your job by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 0

    What's the worst that can happen? Everyone could benefit from spending a few years as a homeless person.

    --
    the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    1. Re:Quit your job by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I'm not a family man, but I'm willing to bet for people who are, watching their kids starve to death slowly is beyond the worst they are willing to suffer.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:Quit your job by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I am a family man, and you are correct.
      I would be looking for work immediatly, and not give notice.

      In the mean time I would stall.

      It's not like there are NO jobs.

      Priniciple means nothing until it is tested.
      The it means something only up to the point of breaknig. It doesn't mean you have no prinicples.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Quit your job by zhrinze · · Score: 1

      Oh PLEASE! Quit being so melodramatic. Everybody pays taxes to the government that go to feeding children who don't have enough to eat. Churches are full of people who will help. Friends and family will help.

      If you have no ethics, no morality, no humanity, then you are SCUM-SUCKING IDIOTS just like the bosses who ask you to do illegal things.

      It no wonder the country goes to he** in a handbasket with an attitude like that. What kind of example do you set for your children when you LIE, CHEAT, and STEAL moron?!?!!

      When I was a child and my father was out of work and unable to find another job for an extended period, my family and my parents friends made sure we had at least enough to get by. Sure it was tough, but I learned it was better to suffer a little rather than to take the easy road and to steal.

      Anyone who plays the "he might have a family to feed" card is PATHETIC!

    4. Re:Quit your job by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      FUD. Nobody is going to starve to death. Hungry, maybe, and listening to kids crying because they're hungry can be trying on the patience--but nobody is going to starve to death.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
  63. responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my first job (defense contractor) my boss came to me and asked me to sign a blank piece of paper so he could assign a drawing number to it. The idea was to get the blank piece of paper into the drafting system so that they could ECO a drawing onto the paper later. All this, to make a deadline that had funding attached.

    I said no. He got mad. I pointed out that he had signature athority too and asked him why he wouldn't sign it. This perplexed him. He left and returned with his boss. I asked him why he wouldn't sign it. They left together and returned with the third level boss. Once again I refused, once again I asked why none of them would sign it.

    They all left. No reprocussions. Because I left the company six months later I'll never know if there would have been any.

    Then I worked IT team leader for a small company. They wanted me at one stage to install pirated software. I refused. They insisted. I offered to talk my boss through the installation so that she could install it. She didn't want that. I asked why she wanted me to do something that she wouldn't do. This got me that standard bullshit lecture that we've all heard a million times about not being a team player. To which I responded "Apparently, that makes two of us." This stopped her pushing me. She did go to the other IT guys, but when they looked at me I shook my head no. No one would do it. The end result was the company finally bought the licences, and we IT guys finally installed the software.

    Don't do anything illegal for any company. You'll find that loyalty is a one way street -- from you to them. It very, very seldom runs the other way.

  64. Get your reward by Quila · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Push it up the chain to the owners, then if there's no love:

    The BSA gives out rewards for reporting piracy. Tell them the situation, but not the company, and find out if the reward will be worth possibly losing your job for reporting them. Then if you do lose your job that's good lawsuit fodder. Reporting is confidential, so the BSA won't tell it's you, but they'll probably know anyway due to your past protests.

    I really don't like the BSA, which likes to drastically punish people for shoddy license accounting. But this is a case of a company willfully and against clear advice installing, using and profiting off of unlicensed software on a large scale. It's just wrong.

    1. Re:Get your reward by Hunterkiller5150 · · Score: 1

      plus you can tell your company that the bsa fines at about $100,000 and incident, that should scare them.

  65. Temporarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Technically, if you kind-of sort-of think of having one version that is illegal somewhere, you are doomed, even if not installed.

    My stand on this topic:
    - I do not condone installing pirated software. When I find one, I remove it. If they are "personal licenses", I do not look, nor want to have anything to do about them, but I tolerate them. The user is responsible for their own computers, and if they want to install "their" Office, that's their problem. If I am told, even candidly, it's a pirated software, I remove it. After all, for example, I have my own personal version of Nero on my computer, and since I don't even have a PC anymore at home, it's valid license. How can I tell if it's really a personal version or not.
    - If a software is purchased but not received yet, I do understand why you would use a pirated version while Adobe sends their CS3 licenses to my company (current example). But this is a temporary measure and because the provider is not being fast enough. In case we are asked, I have the invoice to prove it. Then, make sure it's not the ultra full pro version when in fact you are buying the cheap basic one. Make sure to be consequent ;)
    - If a software uses a hardware key that is making the computer crash (for example Aura that was using the Sentinel key), I have absolutely no problem in using the more stable cracked version than the legal version. That said, I still have the boxes handy, and if asked, I can tell that reason.
    - If it's Office and it's overpriced (really is), I don't care ;) Nah, seriously, see first part: they are personal, and don't involve me ... was just kidding here.

    The idea here is to be VERY precise and clear. Don't tell it's pirated, or else, I will remove. Otherwise, do as you please with your computer. And please don't involve me in this. If asked, they are your personal licenses. If I have one doubt, it will be deleted, don't make me doubt.

  66. get some evidence to avoid being sacked by pbhj · · Score: 1

    Wear a voice recorder and go to his office - ask him (use his name if you can: "Sorry to bother you Mr.Criminal I'm concerned that installing this software unlicensed will be illegal; if you'll sign a letter stating that it's properly licensed and that you've ordered me to install it then I'll carry on."

    He should incriminate himself enough either in his response: "just f***ing install the damn warez you hippy". Or in his letter (which no sane person would write surely).

    Make sure you've got good clear evidence. Then stand firm and either contact his boss (owner) or simply refuse.

    Then when you get fired you should at least win an employment tribunal and get some years of pay as compensation - and see your boss get his ass kicked in court too!

    This is not legal advice - YMMV!!!

  67. When I was in your shoes by evilskull · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The first time I refused to back down and wound up prompting the company owner to call the company lawyer, who literally passed a brick when the owner tried to explain that he didn't "feel" software piracy was wrong. His language is very specific here, because while you might not feel like you're doing something wrong, that doesn't change the fact that it's illegal. Eventually they knuckled down and paid full price for the package they were going to pirate. The second time I was sacked on a friday afternoon after lunch ("Studies have statistically shown that there's less chance of an incident if you do it at the end of the week"). I called the BSA on the way out, and a few weeks later the company was audited to the bargained-down tune of $6,000, of which I received $500 for "doing the right thing". Ultimately, it's a question of how questionable you'll allow your ethics to become; things like this may not travel from job to job or position to position but it's much easier to keep the high ground than to regain it once you've lost it.

    1. Re:When I was in your shoes by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 1

      The first time I refused to back down and wound up prompting the company owner to call the company lawyer, who literally passed a brick...

      That would have been interesting to see. :-)

    2. Re:When I was in your shoes by evilskull · · Score: 1

      I like to think of the brick he "laid" as the cornerstone of my career since then.

  68. Nothing but Pirated Softwares. by skynare · · Score: 1, Funny

    We use nothing but pirated software. Because our financial analysts found out that by doing so, we are actually attacking our competitions and also saving spendings on softwares. It's a total win-win strategy.

  69. you could.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop being such a faggot!

  70. Use the force Luke... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    The force in this case is that you're the IT guy. Can anyone think of the best thing about being the IT guy?

    Anyone? anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

    You can talk over people's heads and just make stuff up! Seriously. I ask myself this as the IT guy all the time: "Hmmm... do I really want to explain this or do I just want to make something up to get rid of this person?".

    Many times, it's make something up. Besides pointing out the obvious illegality, you can just mention that everytime Office is opened the serial number is reported back to Redmond. If two people have it open at the same time then "BAM!" Microsoft sees a possible piracy issue.

    Remember as the IT Guy that you possess specialized knowledge not unlike a doctor or a lawyer: professions where making stuff up is a time honored tradition.

    1. Re:Use the force Luke... by superdude72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember as the IT Guy that you possess specialized knowledge not unlike a doctor or a lawyer: professions where making stuff up is a time honored tradition.

      What are you, like, 16 and you just got off your shift at Fry's? You might get away with this a couple times, but as soon as you get caught--and you will, installing MS Office is not a skill on a par with being a doctor or a lawyer, or even high-end janitorial work--you'll look really, really bad, and you'll be the first person they layoff when your bosses need to trim expenses. Comic Book Store Guy and Nick the Computer Guy are funny on TV, but they're funny precisely because no one wants to work with someone like that.

    2. Re:Use the force Luke... by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me:

      "STOLEN TOOLS HAVE BAD KARMA"

      "Software is just another tool"

      "Don't we have enough problems without making any more for ourselves?"

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    3. Re:Use the force Luke... by -dhan-101 · · Score: 1

      actually, MS Office for Mac does something similar. It broadcasts version information to your subnet. All other copies listen and will shut down if they use the same license.

      http://www.ciac.org/ciac/techbull/CIACTech02-003.s html

  71. I am dealing with this as we speak... by hrrY · · Score: 1

    nuff said.

  72. Writing by Tom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    IANAL, but I am an employee representative with legal training. However, for Germany, not the US.

    First, insist that they give you the order to install that software in writing. Tell them that you believe it is breaking the law, but as a good employee you will of course do it if ordered to do so in writing with either a) a statement from the legal department that it's legal or b) a statement from the boss that he's taking responsibility.

    Stand your ground on this one. Make sure you have a witness (a co-worker) if things get tough.

    Second, put your objections in writing as well. Sign them and mail them to a third party - a union representative, a lawyer, anyone who'll count for something in a court of law.

    That should cover your ass. If you're ok withh probably breaking the law, you're good from here. If you're not ok, do the one thing you can (and, by the way, are legally obliged to) do: Inform the authorities. Really. Stop dancing around the fire. No matter what you do, one thing is sure to not make you happy in the long run, and that's the half-assed way.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:Writing by permaculture · · Score: 1
      Tom said: b) a statement from the boss that he's taking responsibility.

      IANAL, but I don't believe it's possible to assume legal liability just by saying so, even in writing.

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    2. Re:Writing by Tom · · Score: 1

      Not for criminal offenses. However, any judge will have an understanding for an employee who was ordered in writing to do something. It is possible (in Germany, IANAL, etc.) to take responsibility for civil matters.

      Plus, of course, in 99% of the cases, you will not get that order in writing. Your boss is most likely too much of a coward to take a personal risk.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  73. Screw that its every person for themselves by teknosapien · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been in a similar position where I was asked me to testify against my employer. My employer made it clear that if I did "my Career" path would be very limited. So I testified my company was found at fault and within 3 months I was asked to resign, at which point I refused. A few months later I was RIF'd from my position with no separation package. In the exit interview I simply stated "wonder how the lawyers" will feel about this. True to form I had an offer to leave and not come back but I would receive a paycheck for the next 18 months along with all my benefits. If you do the right thing you wont have any regrets. In your position I'm guessing you probably have a manager that is trying to look good by saving money. when the chips fall he's not going to stand in the way of some one else taking the blame. Remember you work for .gov and your expected to fall on your sword

    --
    no matter how good it is, it is human nature always wants to make things better
    1. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there, done that. Except I didn't find out that there were no licenses until I'd been there awhile. Posting as an AC since the company is still around (JBL). Best advice is to do what I did when I discovered it, leave. So a redundant comment, but I agree with you. And I was tempted for a fw years to report them to bsa.org because I was so pissed off.

    2. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      I can't help but to wonder why you granted them an exit interview? From what I've heard, there's absolutely no benefit to the employee.

    3. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by Catcher80 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe you didn't read the comment, but I'm kind of under the assumption that's how he got released with 18 months of pay instead of nothing, is with the aid of that exit interview.

      I myself see possibility in using that money to hire a lawyer, file lawsuit against the company anyway, and cash in more chips when they can't find any formal justifiable complaint filed against you, but I'd never do that, I'm a nice guy. :)

      --
      I sell out to The Man every day.
    4. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by somersault · · Score: 1

      I just notified the Director and we bought appropriate licenses. Problem solved..? I was worried for a while because I didn't want to be seen as spending a lot of money, but it was very necessary, and after a while I realised the company I work for isn't exactly strapped for cash either. We only have about 60 computer users at the moment though, it would be a bit more costly for a larger organisation!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      Unless you work for the American Indian Casinos, and then you're just plain fsncked. Seriously. I was told to lie to the GAO during budget negotiations. I was asked specifically to inflate the prices of a massive equipment overhaul to retail, instead of what the actual rate our vendors were charging us, even asked to forge the quotes.

      I refused - the next day they gave an award for my work with the Tribal Gaming Commission to someone else (who had been sexually harassing me for being female), and appointed the Director of Business my boss - the one who had been telling me to lie. I walked. I seriously dressed up in best and hottest outfit, complete with bitch boots, and went in the next morning - with said vendors in tow - and quit. I told them why, and that I would turn over all documentation to the State Gaming Commission. I had acres of documents on my victimization, bodily injury and physical attacks, including documents with the Sheriffs.

      However. I was screwed 18 ways from Sunday. See... as an American Citizen - white - with no tribal heritage... you can't touch them. No lawsuits, not legal recourse, NOTHING. I went so far as the Congressional offices for my state, and nothing. I was hosed. And I was out of work for six months, not to mention suffering massive physical breakdowns. And nothing. So... about a week after we got word from the Congresscritters I was working with - I dropped a FedEx package in the mail to the State Capitol. Within 4 months, ever single person in the IT Management chain was fired. Some remain out of the IT industry. Shortly after that, most of the rest of the dept. was fired for busting through the firewall and watching pr0n at work. *LOL* Yeah... Karma's a bitch.

      Know your rights before taking ANY action resulting in your loss of livelihood. Know your ramifications, and for Gods Sakes, have some dough put away, if you can. If not... bust a roommate ASAP! :D I did win the fight for unemployment insurance, but it was nearly three months into being out of work. Three hearings later, I was cut a check...not that it was much, but hey, it did keep a roof over my head.

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    6. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "However. I was screwed 18 ways from Sunday. See... as an American Citizen - white - with no tribal heritage... you can't touch them. No lawsuits, not legal recourse, NOTHING."

      Totally untrue.

      But like a lot of people, you don't seem to understand that when you step across the border of a tribal nation, you are leaving your state and entering a whole other jurisdiction. You are, essentially, an alien. If you don't understand the politics of the nation you're entering, maybe you should think twice about going there.

      And if you want to know who made things so screwy in terms of the relations between the USG and the tribal nations, Google up a place we call "Washington DC". As in, who invaded whom?

      The state gaming commission was flat out the wrong body to which you should have appealed. You essentially ran to Colorado to file a complaint about New Mexico. A claim against a state or tribal nation is Federal jurisdiction. But, also, did you even bother with the actual tribal government? Or did you just run to the nearest white guy?

      (And, yeah, that last part means what you think it means)

      I worked for years on rez, for a tribe, in a casino, and saw it a million times. People saying things like, "I want to talk to somebody in charge" when they meant "where's the white guy dammit?"

      None of this is any attempt to excuse what was done to you. It was wrong. There are corrupt Indian casinos and corrupt Indian governments. Just like there are corrupt state governments and have you looked at what's going on in Washington lately? But it doesn't sound at all to me like you handled this well.

      Especially whining, "Poor little white me, I have no rights". Yeah, damn red skins coming over and taking away our rights like that! Who do they think they are?

      By the way, I'm so white, I can get a sunburn off a lit match...

    7. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only necessary for lawsuit avoidance, but also necessary for choice. The more we paid in license fees, the more I began to advocate free software.
      Example: Everybody(small 25user office) wanted to be able to make PDFs. Instead of buying Acrobat Standard(300x25=$7500), I installed PDFCreator or CutePDF writer or PDF Split-and-merge. When they asked for Photoshop(650x25=$16,250), I installed The GIMP. I'm not saying these free products are better in EVERY way, but they got the job done and made me look good. It's an eye-opener for end-users when they realize that there is so much good free software out there. Standing there and spouting off about how great Linux is won't get you anywhere - delivering results like this will.

      This really paves the way for desktop Linux. I'm always hearing horror-stories about the BSA marching in with a search warrant and seizing your servers and half your desktops, as evidence. That could ruin your whole day.

    8. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by somersault · · Score: 1

      I've done similar with the GIMP too, and we have free PDF creator software but that was found by one of our engineers. We already had a couple of copies of Adobe Acrobat here so I was happy to leave people with that, and our fabshop people were adamant that they have it for another person over there, and I couldn't be bothered arguing with them. They're the sort of people that wanted new computers just because they were new, rather than because they actually *needed* new computers (though admittedly they were running on NT before those machines, heh.. but all they do is filling in and printing out forms.. and that's it). How a computer looks on the outside is nothing to do with how it performs. Those machines were Celerons and perform like crap, but they're happy just because they're 'new' machines..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I myself see possibility in using that money to hire a lawyer, file lawsuit against the company anyway, and cash in more chips when they can't find any formal justifiable complaint filed against you, but I'd never do that, I'm a nice guy. :)

      Nice try, but the normal separation agrement has a standard "no sue, no badmouth" provision.

      Personally I think any such thing should be declared legally non-enforceable -- retroactively to 1066 A.D.

      Considering the "no benchmark, no compare and no public review without written permission" provisions of major software EULAs that we already have in place, no such law will be passed.

    10. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      I read the comment but assumed that he could have gotten the same results by simply having his lawyers contact the company. Maybe not.

      I'd be afraid of saying something during the interview that could be used against me later, possibly in court. The articles that I've read say don't grant an exit interview unless you think you might want to work for the company again in the future. There's typically no benefit to the employee, but there is possibly a risk.

      Anyway, it worked for the guy in question so good for him.

    11. Re:Screw that its every person for themselves by Catcher80 · · Score: 1

      yeah thats a pretty good point, the "unless you think you might want to work for the company later" part.

      but yeah, it worked out for him, yay :)

      --
      I sell out to The Man every day.
  74. Here you go by geekoid · · Score: 1

    1) Talk to a lawyer about your liability.
    2) Get any statements made by them in eMail.
    3) Tell them you refuse to do this because it's illegal. Make it clear that you have seen a lawyer and will see to it that action is taken if you are fired for any reason.
    4) Don't do it.
    Or

    3) Tell the CEO to pay you 25,000 bonus or you will report them to the BSA, and the SEC(assuming they're public).
    3a) If they fire you(hey, you never know) contact the BSA and SEC
    3b) Tell your lawyer they fired you for not doing something illegal. NEVER EVER EVER tell anyone about step 3.

    4) Prepare your resume.

    Remember: When it hits the fan, You will be the scapegoat, even if that means you will go to jail. They will ALL say you never mentioned anything, and that they told you to be sure to get the liscenses. Also, that they are terribly sorry to MS.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Here you go by anagama · · Score: 1
      2.9) look up what sort of prison time extortion is worth -- if you can't do the time, don't do the crime.

      3) Tell the CEO to pay you 25,000 bonus or you will report them to the BSA, and the SEC(assuming they're public).
      ...
      3b) Tell your lawyer they fired you for not doing something illegal. NEVER EVER EVER tell anyone about step 3.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  75. How to put this - oh, FUCK MICROSOFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, we buy shitloads of software for exorbitant prices - fuck anyone who tells you how to use that software. Give me a break. Install it on billions of your machines if you want.

    1. Re:How to put this - oh, FUCK MICROSOFT by ico2 · · Score: 0

      I agree with you except for 2 points.
      Number 1, the language with which you make the point is hardly appropriate.
      Number 2, I dont think you are answering the question.

      Installing pirated microsoft software has 2 effects, firstly it reduces microsoft's revenue (assuming you would otherwise have bought a suitable site license). Secondly it keeps microsoft the standard by continuing to force users to use it.

      Legally I am not sure whether it is you or your employer or both that is responsible, but my guess would be that if you were explicitly ordered to do it by your employer then they are responsible (although I may well be wrong).

      Obviously (as you said) installing openoffice would be the ideal soloution, but your employer does not let you install it instead of ms office. Perhaps you could slowly persuade users to switch to openoffice until ms office was no longer required and could be removed without anyone noticing?

      eg: Q: "how do I fix <some problem related to microsoft word>?"
      A: "Perhaps it would work better in openoffice?"

      Reminding your employer that installing pirated software is illegal would probably a good start (not a threat, obviously, just a reminder).

  76. The question depends on What and Where by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    First, if you live in a country where most software is pirated in commercial offices, not doing so is competitively disadvantageous.

    Second, if the definition of pirating by another country does not match the law and practice in the country in which this occurs, you need to ask what the definition of pirating is.

    Third, it depends on the utility and usage - do you use it often? what type of firm are you?

    Fourth, it depends on who the money goes to. For example, does it go to Larry Ellison to buy more yachts?

    Fifth, it depends on how long it takes to get a legit copy - if it would take you four years to do the paperwork to install a legit copy after purchasing it, why are you doing this?

    And, sixth, it depends on if the software firm that produced said software stole your concepts and patented or copyrighted them.

    But, most of all, it really depends on how much you are getting ripped off for when information just wants to be free ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  77. Shurely shum mishtake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4. Install Open Office instead, see if people notice.

    Users will be wanting to know who has filled their hard drives with syrup.

  78. You write a memo by dskoll · · Score: 1

    You write a memo that says:

    "XXX has asked me to install pirated software on the company network. Since this is illegal, I have no choice but to refuse."

    and you send a copy to your boss, your boss's boss, and so on.

    You should also brush up your resume, although if you do get fired for refusing to do something illegal, I would think that most civilized jurisdictions would consider that to be wrongful dismissal.

    1. Re:You write a memo by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "You should also brush up your resume, although if you do get fired for refusing to do something illegal, I would think that most civilized jurisdictions would consider that to be wrongful dismissal."

      Of course, winning a wrongful termination suit doesn't translate to "early retirement with the CEO's wealth transferred to your bank account."

      The first thing I would do is to have a confidential meeting with an HR manager, and explain specifically that you have been asked to do something that you believe is a crime. I would want to receive in writing that the company officially does not consider this to be a crime. Follow the instructions to the letter.

      If you are ever in court, show this official statement to the opposing counsel, and let them know you are showing it to them before the judge. It will end the story.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  79. US Law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several comments here suggest getting someone higher up to document the order to commit the crime, so the blame will not lay with this installer.

    If he does, and even if he isn't the installer, he'll know the software is illegal. Isn't he required to report that?

    It's sounding like you don't have to report known illegal actions in the US. Is that correct?

  80. Ethics vs. paycheck by houbou · · Score: 1

    To me, the answer is simple, it's the CYA technique (Cover Your @ss). There is no reason in being a snitch, it's hard to get good references from your job, if you willingly put them in trouble, your reputation goes down too. The best course of action, one which CYAs and is ethical for you and them (employer), is to write them a memo, letter, make sure it is signed by you, give copies to your superior and/ whoever needs to know at your place of employment, and have the following content: 1) Part of your duties is to install illegal software, for which you do not want to be held responsible 2) If possible, try and explain the negative impact of the company, should the discovery of illegal software use is found. 3) Give your employer a list of legal alternatives, and explain the pros/cons (cost, etc..) 4) Ensure your employer that if none of the alternatives are viable, and that you will continue your duties, that you will do so, at THEIR own risk, not yours and that they have been warned. Don't just give them the letter, use the postal system to send them the letter, and send yourself a sign copy to yourself, and DO NOT OPEN IT. Keep it safe, if ever, one day, there are issues, this letter may save your @ss, because it will be sealed, signed, delivered to you and it would have been stamped with the date you received it. It is always best, in these matters to send the letter as a package and get a receipt. Cheers!

  81. Explain to them why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...piracy is going to be the more expensive option, since fines that the company will need to pay after the BSA audit are very much higher than the costs of licensing. And that a BSA audit is going to happen for sure, since BSA encourages whistleblowers and preserves their anonymity, and it will only take one disgruntled employee to cause the company a big, expensive, problem.

    Do this in the body of your letter of resignation, where you provide 30 day notice. CC that letter to the CEO and the Chairman of the Board. Yeah, you are burning the bridges behind you. But what is behind you is hostile territory— always was since the managers who have created this situation have dangerously dysfunctional thinking patterns. Consider yourself lucky that you learned how dangerous these people are without getting permanently damaged.

    But also suggest in this letter that if they are interested in a truly lower cost approach, you would consider working for them as an outside consultant for 130% of your current salary with a two year contract with appropriate bonuses for timely conversions to high quality, low cost FOSS alternatives to their MS habit.

    The 130% will cover the loss of your benefits, and will be a little lower than the total payroll cost of your current position... so this is in fact a reasonable offer. Coupled with oral statements in the right ears that you regret that it is now impossible to continue in your present job under management that you can no longer trust, this could open up new career possibilities for you.

    Use better sentence structures than I have when you compose this letter.

  82. Vicarious Liability and Copyright Law by Throtex · · Score: 1

    A very good argument could be made in this case that the liability in tort should be imposed on your employer rather than you, under the concept of vicarious liability. This is similar to respondeat superior in agency.

    This is not to say you should do it, however. As many like to point out that breaking the law doesn't mean you're necessarily doing something unethical, operating within the law doesn't guarantee that you are being ethical, either.

  83. Ask for the orders in writing. by ChrisKnight · · Score: 1

    When an employer asks me to do something to which I strongly object, I ask them to give me the instruction in writing and to spell out my concerns and the consequences and their acceptance of responsibility. I very much doubt the controller of your company will sign a written document acknowledging that he is asking you to break the law, and agreeing to take responsibility for the act.

    I have had to do this four times in my career. Twice they signed, and twice they backed off; and either way I kept my ass out of the fire.

    -Chris Knight

    --
    -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
  84. the best thing to do is.... by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

    wait until just after someone you don't like leaves your company, then write an anonymous to the copyright holders, the police, F.A.C.T or equivalent and then sit back and watch the auditors come in. You won't be considered as a whistle-blower :)

  85. Quit, or just refuse to do it. by zullnero · · Score: 1

    Quit. Seriously, if they get caught, how much do you want to bet they'll try and say that it was all you just "trying to save money for his boss"? There's a real good chance that your boss won't take accountability for his actions and the organization will not either. You can bet they'll do anything they can to delete any evidence either, including confiscating your work PC before the feds have a chance to look at it.

    If they won't install free software, and they demand that you do the actual legwork of the piracy, then leave and let them do it themselves. If you feel rather altruistic, you could file a complaint anonymously. Most legitimate companies pay a lot of money for software, and they aren't going to NOT hire you because you refused to install pirated material.

    I have been there before, and know exactly what you're going through. If your superior demands that you install something illegal, then don't do it. If they fire you for that, then report them for it. Chances are, they'll realize that you'll do that and they'll back down, or if they do go through with it, they're idiots.

  86. Simple by slapout · · Score: 1

    Report them to the BSA. Collect $10,000. Simple. :-)

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  87. We did it too by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    If it's any consolation (????), we at my department of a large well-known company routinely abused any software licenses that we were able to.
    Unless the software policed its own license, such as checking if other copies of itself were installed on the network, or required a key, or was checked when a support call was placed, we were told to install what we needed when we needed it regardless of the license policies.

    This apparently varied by low or mid-level manager: some followed the rules, several of mine openly flaunted them. Upper managers would never begin to claim to tolerate license piracy (this sentence was carefully crafted).
    I was led to believe I would be viewed as uncooperative if I did not flaunt the rules when there were no consequences to face.

    Is this a surprise?

    Maybe the title should say "we do it too".

  88. Excellent point! by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 1

    I agree with this Carrot fellow. Your boss might be smart enough to avoid leaving an electronic trail, but document everything you can. With luck, you won't need any of it, and if your boss(es) make the right decision, you can always delete it.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  89. BSA Story-time by mandie · · Score: 1

    Call up the BSA and ask what the penalties would be if a small company were found with about X unlicensed copies of Office.

    Sit your controller down for story-time. If he doesn't seem moved, invite the company lawyer.

    --
    Grüß Gott aus Bayern!
  90. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  91. Get a raise by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

    Just blackmail the bastards.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  92. Options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Other than drafting a letter to the owners of the company on how I disagree with the policy, what else can I do?"

    Let's see... you could:

    1) Turn yourself in to the the BSA and claim complete responsibility for the morons who employ you.
    2) Use all you vacation time, starting now, to find another job.
    3) Convert your entire IRA this company's stock and then whine profusely when they go belly up...
    like a good Enronite.
    4) Chalk it up to experience and move on, realizing that your soul is worth more that you will ever be paid.
    5) Start babbling random expletives and threatening the establishment for rewarding dickheads with startup capital.

  93. We dont have access to install programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cuz I cant even install free open source apps. Granted I use portable apps and standalone exe apps. Using illegal apps is just dumb at work, because if you have any credible business you should be using paid for apps. Now if you are at home and need to learn and keep up to date on some programs its not as big a deal.

  94. Objection by themelv · · Score: 1

    "over ruled by our controller, to my disagreement" I wouldn't stand for an overruling... overrule him... see how he likes it. If he doesn't sustain your ruling, you'll just have to agree to disagree.

  95. Mod up by Daengbo · · Score: 1

    Excellent letter. To the point and business-like. No "Install or quit" because it just states the facts. Kudos to you.

  96. How badly do you want/need your job? by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1
    If your company is so unethical about software licenses, where else do you think they're cutting corners, fudging the books, ripping off vendors, etc.? You seriously need to ask yourself if this truly is the job for you. In addition, you can personally be held liable for misdeeds such as this even if you've been told to do it by your boss.

    If it were me, I'd be updating my resume.

  97. It happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I walked into a job where an office of 80 people were running from one copy of every piece of software they owned. From my personal experience, once they ask you to do this and you balk, your days are numbered anyway. In my case, they didn't let me go right away, they waited for a few months. Of course in that time I prepared reports and estimates to make them all legal and work within the corperate structure.

    The truth is, if they don't have enough money to buy software, they also don't have enough money to give you a raise and you are in a dead end job. Get out as soon as possible. After I was let go, I did report them to BSA but they were absolutly incompetent. And all any lawyers wanted was a retainer to do nothing. The best thing you can do is refuse to do anything illegal and get as much documentation as possible so when they fire you, you have a leg to stand on. In the long run, you will be much better off in your next job.

  98. office software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is possible to buy real copies of LOTUS SMART SUITE 9.8 for as little as $20 a copy online and it is excellent software. It can import Microsoft files and save them as Microsoft format. 123 is excellent. WORDPRO is better word processor than WORD and it is all capable of being saved as Word or Excel. They might be cheap but this is both cheap and legal.

  99. Just steal everything then. by Murrdox · · Score: 1

    Next time your boss says "I need a bigger desk," then tell him "OK", and proceed to help him steal someone else's desk. If he asks what the hell you're doing, then simply explain to him that stealing is apparently how your company gets what it needs to work on.

    Then, offer to drive him to Office Depot, and steal boxes of pens, and new phones for everyone.

  100. oh please by bwy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love the fact that pretty much all the responses to this topic say "quit!"

    It is amazing how easy it is to tell someone else to quit their job. The majority of people telling this guy to quit have probably installed lots of pirated software in the past, and they probably have music that they didn't buy. Why should you be so offended when your manager asks you to do something that you've already done in your personal life many times?

    It is kind of like if you are a mass murderer and go to prison, and your cell mate asks you to kill someone in a cell down the hall. Shouldn't be that offended that he asked, should you?

    Anyway, what this company is asking him to do is wrong. No doubt. But I love the fact that everyone here is so incredibly offended and now has all these morales that they didn't have last week when they were posting bits about how they trade music files without guilt because even though the law says it is illegal, they don't recognize the law as being valid.

    Well, this is SLASHDOT, after all.

    1. Re:oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Single individuals often hold contradictory opinions. It should be no surprise that a large group of people can, taken as a whole, have two different sets of morals simultaneously. That doesn't make them hypocritical.

      And as for the morally flexible people who commit copyright infringement, there's a big difference between breaking civil law and asking someone else to break civil law, both in the law's eyes and it terms of morals.

    2. Re:oh please by JoeInnes · · Score: 1

      The difference is, if you choose to pirate software/music/films/whatever, it's a fair cop if you get caught. If you're instructed to do it by someone who is in a position of authority, then it becomes a little less fair if you get caught. Personally, I'd protest, explain that I completely disagree with the principle of installing pirated software (whether or not you do...), and if your boss refuses to accept that, leave. I wouldn't bother suing for unfair dismissal, (which it is) and instead just get a new job, and act like nothing happened, except, drop a note in to the BSA, explaining why you just left. That way, if your business ever gets audited, and the paper trail highlights you as a guy that stood up for what he believed in, and you get subpoenaed to ask for your version of events, you can honestly say, "Look, I didn't agree with it at the time, I left, I informed the authorities, but I didn't do it for personal gain. I did it as a professional, doing his job". Obviously, it's not easy to take a decision that could end up costing you your job, but to be honest, if you kick up enough of a stink, your employer will back down, based on the fact that he is assuming you are going to sue for unfair dismissal. A minor point though... you ARE legally obliged as soon as you become aware that the software has been installed to inform the authorities. If your employer refuses to back down, you're in a situation that will almost certainly end up with you in court. If you play your cards right though, you'll be a witness rather than a defendant. Good luck, it's a hard decision to take, I hope you make the right choice.

    3. Re:oh please by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's a lot of 'probably's
      And then you go on to assume the person with the question does them themselves.

      What a stupid ass you are.

      That said.
      Even if you do commit copyright infringment on your own, that's different then deciding to do it for a company who could use you as a scapegoat.

      Also, /. is not group think. The people posting about this could be people who don't pirate, you ass.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear lady, this is not solely about moral issues. A very real problem is that if you do install the unlicensed software, you are guilty of breaking the law, and anyone can rat you out, regardless of who ordered you to do it. THink you're safe if you didn't do it? Or if you didn't see it, even? Think again. Even if you didn't do it and only know it's happening, but you're not telling the authorities, in most countries you would be an accessory.

    5. Re:oh please by greenbird · · Score: 1

      It is kind of like if you are a mass murderer and go to prison, and your cell mate asks you to kill someone in a cell down the hall. Shouldn't be that offended that he asked, should you?

      It's one thing when you do something illegal that is only known to you on a level that only affects you personally. It's quite another thing when your doing it on a large scale and can have major affects on many other people. Using your murder analogy it should be you were in prison for killing yourself and getting offended when the guard tells you to become a mass murderer.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    6. Re:oh please by morari · · Score: 0

      Stealing for yourself and stealing for a company are very different. Just like stealing from an individual and steal from a company are different.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    7. Re:oh please by th3rmite · · Score: 1

      Dude, wtf are you talking about? I'm one of the biggest anti-piracy advocates I know. I even made my wife sanitize her mp3 collection. Just because I love posting on slashdot doesn't automatically mean I support illegal activities. Get a life.

    8. Re:oh please by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      I love the fact that everyone here is...

      There are over a million Slashdot logins. Even assuming that only 5% of those are active and posting users, you're still making a generalization about 50,000 opinions based on a few hundred comments. "Everyone", my ass.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    9. Re:oh please by Jehosephat2k · · Score: 1

      1) Quit Job

      2) Report violations to BSA

      3) ???

      4) Profit!

    10. Re:oh please by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between what you do in your private life and what you do in your public/professional life.

      Myself, I keep that annoying little nagware stuff on my computer at home because the prices for them are ridiculous. $30 for WinZip or WinRAR? GTFO.

      In your private life you are only beholden to one person, yourself. If you screw up then its your ass in the fryer. In your public/professional life you are beholden to the company and the owner as well as all sorts of legal regulations and such. If you screw up then its both your ass and the company's ass in the fryer.

      While I might download some music or a few episodes of XYZ show on the internet at home. I would not do such at the office. I might even pirate a game or two to try it out before buying it. I might do such at home so I can evaluate a software package at home so that I'm able to make an informed decision at the office but usually I just delete whatever because its crap. Needless to say as the head of IT in your department or whatever you have the responsibility to guard both your ass as well as the company's ass. By getting liscenses (bleh I dont like paying M$) and/or offering up open source alternatives (Yay, Open Office!) you are not only saving your own ass, you are saving the ass of the company as well. Just like others have said, if you put in pirated software and some disgruntled employee decides to cash in on a $1000 bonus for tipping off the BSA you are the one that is screwed.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    11. Re:oh please by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Your logic is highly flawed.

      You're assuming/implying that the people posting in here ALSO post in the "How to steal music" topics.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  101. Immediately Resign by coaxial · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've been asked to break the law. And if it's ever found out (and keep in mind the VAST majority of BSA audits are on the behest of disgruntled employees) you'll be the one on the hook. You don't want that.

    Resign, and make no bones about why.

  102. What else do they do? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
    They're asking you, point blank, to commit a crime on their behalf. Their controller, that is to say, their chief financial administrator, the guy who's supposed to keep the books straight and honest, is asking you to participate in a scam to conceal a debt legally due to one of your vendors. So I want you to keep this question in mind:


    What else are they doing that's illegal?

    I'm not kidding here. If they're willing, as a company, to do something illegal, then this is either the tip of the iceburg or the top of the slippery slope. If they get caught at this, you'll be the scapegoat. If they get caught at something else, you'll come to work one day to find a a padlocked door and a nice man from the DA/DOJ/FBI/IRS saying you're unemployed now, but he'd sure appreciate hundreds of uncompensated hours of your cooperation, and what's this they're saying in there about you wanting to install illegal software?

    Resign. They are unethical and you don't want their stink on your resume.

    Document all they've asked you to do, then hand in your resignation. If they give you an ounce of grief, well, in your shoes I'd wish I had the balls to demand four months' paid severance with full benefits, on top of the glowingest of references, all of which (I dream of reminding them) would cost them a lot less than one visit from the SIIA --- or one shot on the six o'clock of their executives news being led from the building in handcuffs.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  103. Simple answer for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just NO, but HELL NO. I would never under any circunctances do anything unethical, much less illegal, for my employer. If that's the policy at your place, then find another job that has a well documented ethics policy. I'm not getting thrown in jail for a bunch of cheap, greedy bastards.

  104. Get it in writing... by jemenake · · Score: 1

    I'd be interested in seeing how they react if you told them that, prior to your installing the software, you need to get something in writing from the boss stating that: A) They're instructing you to install the software, and B) that they know you're out of licenses and that installing the software would violate the law.

    This would put them in a weird spot because there's no way in hell that they're going to give you that, yet I don't see how they could blame you for realizing that you need to cover your ass.

    They could have one of three responses:
    1 - They don't give it to you in writing and they pause long enough to consider trying OpenOffice,
    2 - They don't give it to you in writing and they conclude that you're not a team player and that you're just looking for something to blackmail the bosses with.
    3 - The DO give it to you in writing (in which case, your ass may or may not be covered, so you might or might not want to go ahead and install it). Either way, as long as you have the paper, your employment there is assured. However, I'm not sure you'd want to keep working at a place where the bosses are so dumb as to ask you to break the law in writing.

  105. email won't save the job. by twitter · · Score: 2, Informative

    The more I think about it, the more the honest choice sounds right. You can't make dishonest people act right. When your boss is not honest, it's time to leave.

    If they are going to fire him for refusing, they will lose the email and lie about that too if anything bad happens. They can also lie about the licenses. The boss will lie to HR and then paper his file as a trouble maker.

    They've asked him to do something they think is wrong. There's no winning in a situation like that.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:email won't save the job. by KinkoBlast · · Score: 3, Funny

      CC it, not blindly, to yourself, your boss, your boss's boss, all the way up the chain... and MS, too, just for the hell of it.

      That ought to make it hard to 'lose'.

      If you're that worried about your job, HR too.

    2. Re:email won't save the job. by rainman_bc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      CC it, not blindly, to yourself, your boss, your boss's boss, all the way up the chain... and MS, too, just for the hell of it.

      Yeah, as if THAT isn't a career limiting move. Everyone LOVES a snitch.

      First you email them. Maybe you'll even get a noteworthy response you can then keep for a while.

      Seriously, don't snitch as a first resort, use it as a last resort - hell even make an HR issue out of it.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:email won't save the job. by bob_herrick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Impractical advice, sorry to say. Sounds like fun, but inivites heavy duty retaliation, and undermines the possiblity of support from above. The upper level CC's will be seen by both your boss and the folks above him/her as a transparent play. The CC will make it look like your mission is to make your boss look bad, which may be true, but it is not the perception you wish to leave. A BCC to self is fine. If you get pushback from the boss, CC'ing his boss on your reply is fine, even with the e-mail chain - but round one CC chain you suggest is going to convert an outcome from which it is possible to emerge with a victory to a sure loss.

    4. Re:email won't save the job. by Phu5ion · · Score: 1

      It's not so much about saving his job, as it is about covering his own ass. It sounds like the OP has already gone to his boss and they are still insisting. At least with an email it will be in "writing" just in case they either force him or fire him.

      --
      Slashdot is kind of like Playboy; we aren't here to read the articles.
    5. Re:email won't save the job. by Petrushka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      CCing everyone and their boss is not really a good idea, because it contains an implicit threat. If you act like you're ready to hold something over someone's head, even "just in case", people are going to react as though they've already been threatened.

    6. Re:email won't save the job. by terjeber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bad advice. Snitching is a bad thing. You don't have to. The proper, legal, way is the right thing to do. Refuse the request. Don't go above someones head (that is usually a bad idea). If you have an HR department, talk to the HR person. The HR person is in legal hot water if he complains and later get fired for sticking to the law.

      As I said - there is a proper process for this, and it is trivial. He sticks to the law. Refueses all such requests. If they fire him, he sues them. They're not going to fire him. If the organization is of some size, his manager should be in trouble once the HR person gets involved.

    7. Re:email won't save the job. by pete6677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're not doing this to keep your career within the company, you're doing it to buy some time while you search for a job with an ethical firm. Of course an unethical boss will try to get you fired for blowing the whistle. The email is just to cover your ass and possibly have grounds for a wrongful termination suit. Career potential in a company like this is zero unless you can actively aid and abet wrongdoing.

    8. Re:email won't save the job. by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you're doing it to buy some time while you search for a job with an ethical firm.

      They exist?

    9. Re:email won't save the job. by brufar · · Score: 1

      Completely agree with this. Whenever I receive an email from another manager and they have CC'd my supervisor, I tend to take that as an unprovoked attack on me, and I immediately am put in an adversarial stance with that colleague. I don't know about the rest of you, but I would think it's in your best interest to stay on the GOOD side of the IT manager, and department as a whole. Sure if you give us grief your problems will still get resolved eventually, it si part of our job. On the other hand if you don't give us crap all the time your problems tend to get solved a bit faster..

      People that CC or BCC up the chain all the time really tick me off. If you have a problem with me, man up and come talk to me about it. I'm a pretty reasonable person until you start resorting to attacks on me personally or professionally. I also don't tend to leave myself open so that an attack of that type would be effective, I wasn't born yesterday, and I've seen people like you before CC'ing, brown-nosing, screw everyone else on your way to the top with your "it's all about me.. " attitude.

      In this thread, I agree the email response to your manager is appropriate, do NOT CC or BCC up the chain unless you can not get a resolution with your manager. If your manager refuses to address the license compliance issue, then and only then should you think about moving up the managerial chain. This may be his personal view for saving the company money, the company as a whole may have other, more ethical views. Don't immediately write off the entire company because one manager doesn't want to spend his departmental budget on licensing, he is wrong, and he knows he is wrong.

      --
      far...out
    10. Re:email won't save the job. by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      CCing everyone and their boss is not really a good idea, because it contains an implicit threat.

      Anytime you record a communication, a threat is implied. A couple of months before I was fired last year, I started receiving bizarrely-worded emails from a peer. After some time (before I knew my job was at risk but after it was too late to do anything), I realized the only way it made sense to send those emails with that wording was if they were BCCed to my boss.

      However, because the accusations were largely unfounded due to mitigating circumstances my boss was aware of that my peer wasn't, and because my boss never said anything, I assumed if my boss was involved he wasn't taking the accusations seriously. I didn't have any direct evidence he was involved anyway, so therefore I didn't feel a need to resolve the situation until it was too late.

      Two pieces of advice from my experience: 1) Treat every email you receive or send like the person who can damage you most has already seen it (applies to voice mail too, Alec Baldwin), and 2) Either threaten someone outright, or don't do it at all.

      If your goal is to get someone fired, a disguised threat works fine. If your goal is to change the behavior for the good of the individual and the company, you need to be as forthright as possible about the choices at hand and the consequences of each choice.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    11. Re:email won't save the job. by bob_herrick · · Score: 1

      I think it is premature to come to this conclusion, and rather too black and white. It is possible that this e-mail costs someone a job, but my guess is that the boss has more to lose than the sender. He or she is the one instructing illegal behavior.

  106. Two true stories in this vein by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1) Early in my career, a VP walked into my office and asked me to steal a copy of a competitor's source code. I refused. I later found out he'd already asked someone else more senior, who had also refused. He eventually came to his senses, and never asked us to do anything unethical or illegal again. Everyone lived happily ever after.

    2) A few years later at another company, two C?Os kept a vendor busy while another VP "borrowed" a copy of their code "until we can afford to pay it back". The rest of us found out about this when the company got sued. Not long after, the company went into bankruptcy and everyone was laid off. Just before thanksgiving. Happy holidays to all the rest of us. I don't think it came to criminal proceedings against the officers of the company, but it very well could have. Civil suits were also filed against the CEO/CFO team, and they declared personal bankruptcy as well.

    So which boat would you rather be in?

    I know, you could end up getting chunked out of the boat all together. At that point, I'd drop the hammer on them. If you think think that's a likely scenario, speak with a lawyer NOW so if they threaten you, you know what to say. That might solve teh problem.

  107. Stick with it by invictuslemming · · Score: 1

    If you're dead set against it, make a point of telling them that, document everything along the way so you have a paper trail of this entire incident. Worst case scenario is they fire you. Solution: Take it to court and let the company try to explain how they fired you because you refused to break the law on their behalf. Then take your settlement and go on vacation. You can bet that if a regulatory group does crack down on your company, and you followed through with loading up unlicensed copies, you're going to be blamed for it. Personally, I'd say fight it, don't give in to them.

  108. How strongly do you disagree? by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

    If it's enough that you know you'll hate yourself if you stay and follow your boss' orders, I don't see a good reason for you to continue working there. The IT job market is slow, yes, but there ARE jobs out there that an IT professional can do.

    I'm sure your pay and benefits are excellent, but neither of these are worth an integrity compromised.

    --
    "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  109. Get your own Lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would seek out a Lawyer that has experience in Whistle Blower cases. How large is this company? How deep do their pockets (or insurers pockets) go?

    Document everything. Get it in writing, or via email. Play DUMB when asking for this stuff. You need to craft the higher ups an email that is simply an FYI that this is violating the licesning terms. That you don't feel comfortable. Get a delivery and read receipt.

    If shit really hits the fan, you have CYA.

  110. One e-mail message will do the job nicely. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    That looks quite good and reasonable. Maybe it should also be cced to the manager's boss, unless the manager is the owner, or perhaps if there's a legal department to them.

    Falcon
    1. Re:One e-mail message will do the job nicely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was put in this situation last year, and unfortunately for me, my boss is the owner and also a lawyer. I really should find a new job.

      Lawyers seem to have the least respect for the law.

    2. Re:One e-mail message will do the job nicely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lawyers seem to have the least respect for the law. Obviously.
  111. Prision, FInes and Bubba the Prisoner SEX by as400tek · · Score: 1

    So when you are fined and are put on trial will it be time to turn them in or will that be a good time to just do what they tell you. Turn them in. If they are doing business in the real world they either need to pay for the tools their employee use to get their work done or need to look at FREE alternatives. Turn them in and then leave because they don't value you if they would ask you to do something like that.

    --
    David Vasta iSeries(AS/400) Admin & Junkie
  112. Turn about... by grilled-cheese · · Score: 1

    If they want you to install illegal software against your wishes:
    1. Get documentation of your attempts to convince them otherwise
    2. Get more documentation of them instructing you to install illegal software
    3. Document how, when, and against your wishes you followed their instructions
    4a. I'm sure there are lots of legal organizations that would like to give them a royal depantsing for trying to use illegal software, you might consider calling them.
    4b. If you just can't bring yourself to blow the whistle, keep the documentation safe in secret (It may turn out handy later).

    Overall I would think you must consider that a company wanting you to install illegal software is probably also going to be a company to wipe their hands of the situation and point the finger at you when the feds come knocking.

    You might also suggest that your documentation is highly tied to the police. If you got fired, a manila envelope might find its way to the right person's desk. ;)

  113. Integrity by N7DR · · Score: 3, Insightful
    To answer the question: no.

    And the reason for that answer is best summed up by one of my all-time favourite quotations (from, I think, Alan Simpson): "If you have integrity, nothing else matters. If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters".

  114. Install Open Office! by Angus+McCloud · · Score: 1

    As an experiment, one of my friends wanted to see if he could make people think they were using MS office, when really it was Open Office. He succeeded admirably... He installed open office, changed the icons to look like the MS office ones, changed all links to the files so they said things like 'microsoft excel', and set all the defaults and everything in the programs so they saved documents and everything the same way as the microsoft equivalents. Kind of a pain in the butt, but most users are not going to notice the difference between the two pieces of software (particularly if they're being told they're launching MS products)...

  115. Protect Yourself by tnk1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You should never allow yourself to be ordered into doing something illegal. However, your boss *can* put you in a no-win situation unless you take some precautionary steps.

    The fact of the matter is that you need to *first* make sure that you handle the situation calmly. If your boss backs down, it doesn't mean he isn't going to hold a grudge against you if you caused his pet project to fail.

    Proving why you have been fired can be a tough thing to do if time is allowed to pass. You need to evaluate if you can work with this individual in the future. If he is the type to hold grudges, start looking for another job, even if he seems to calm down. A boss who is willing to order you to break laws will see nothing wrong with trumping up means to decrease your performance ratings even if he doesn't fire you or target you for the next layoff. Moral high-ground isn't very comforting if you are sacked and not prepared for it.

    If any boss gave me an illegal order, I'd instantly consider getting a new job. Even if you aren't fired, you may find yourself laid off after someone sues your company for similar actions.

    Don't expect the legal system to protect you without preparation. If a boss calls you into his office and gives you an illegal order that you refuse, it will be very difficult to prove he ever gave the order if that boss denies it. Your word against his and all that. At that point, you are a potentially marked man, without recourse until you take some action to strengthen your position.

    If the boss does manage to give you the order without any other witnesses, your first step is to go to his boss, with a co-worker and report that order was given. He needs to know about his underling, and you want the co-worker there to make sure that it is clear that you immediately went to him about it. It also prevents that person from covering your boss and his own backend, should he also be the unscrupulous type.

    Be professional about it, though. I have had some bosses who were generally not bad people, but wanted to get the job done. If you can phrase your refusal in a way that is not indignant, but still a firm, "no", then you will be better off. He may realize he's been a jerk, but rubbing it in his face is a bad idea, unless you plan on leaving your job soon anyway.

    1. Re:Protect Yourself by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It is important to document the people, circumstances and decisions leading up to you having to take illegal action. Times, people and details are necessary. keep a journal specifically for this problem. Ideally you should have started from day 1. but if you have emails of them. record them in that journal.

      The goal is to protect yourself in the case that the company is in an actionable position. If IT workers had unions you would talk to your union representative about this.

      Your choices are:
      1. accept the problems and continue to encourage compliance from within
      2. prepare your resume right now, and leave the position, never looking back. (this is may only practical in "right-to-work" states)
      3. prepare your resume right now, and make a call reporting them to BSA/SIIA/etc.

      don't bother threatening to report them. it's enough to say "we shouldn't do this because ...". Threats will be met with very harsh and abusive treatment. If you threaten (or they find out you posted this on slashdot) you could be sacrificed as a scapegoat.

      Make sure you are not in a position where management could just claim it was your idea to pirate software. Like your suggestion to use OpenOffice everywhere doesn't turn into a suggestion to pirate MS Office everywhere. People may pretend that the names are similar enough that you said something totally different.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  116. Let the managers do the dirty work... by javanree · · Score: 1

    I've been in the same position a few times... refused a few times, which gave me a somewhat hard time for a bit but last time decided to play it different. Went to the media safe, grabbed the CD set, tossed it on the manager's desk and told him to do it himself, since I didn't feel like dirtying my hands. That made him wake up...

  117. Well... by crazzeto · · Score: 1

    Do you like the idea of working for a company that insits you do something illegal? Personally I wouldn't, there's nothing wrong with a mix of MS office for those that need it and those who have Open Office for those who don't, we do that an my current company as a cost saver.

  118. screw Microsoft!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok you need to CYA (cover your a$$), get it in email and then print out and keep a hard copy at home. You could simply send an email to your boss stating that you want to clarify their stance. Even if you don't get a response print out your sent email.

  119. Solution by slazzy · · Score: 1

    Install open office and just change all the icons to look like MS office, I bet they won't even notice the difference - other than the lack of crashing, random data corruption and failure to open different formats / versions that comes with MS office

    --
    Website Just Down For Me? Find out
  120. Get a portable audio recorder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dunno if an iPod has a microphone and can directly record audio to it's hard drive or not, but I have a competing brand of pocket mp3 music player with a 30GB hard drive and it does record audio files, quite nicely, and quite discretely. I always have it in my shirt pocket. Nobody ever thinks twice about it, as carrying an "iPod" device is commonplace.

    Whenever my employer or a vendor "calls a meeting" and I wish to capture them telling lies or making empty promises (or the remote possibility of asking me or my fellow employees to commit some type of offense), you can bet that my personal audio player in my pocket is running the whole time, capturing it all.

    Cover your ass, son.... cover your ass.

    1. Re:Get a portable audio recorder... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      In many states, audio recordings of others without their knowledge (and without a court order) is illegal.

      Check your laws.

  121. Sarbanes-Oxley gives you a direct line to the top by nicolaiplum · · Score: 1

    If your company is publically traded in the US, it needs to comply with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley act. One of those provisions [1] is that there is to be an Audit Committee, not reporting to any executive officer (but to the board of directiors, including non-executive directors), and that employees be provided and told about a process to report ethical or illegal issues to the Audit Committee. The process usually requires that the employee tell their supervisor first, but if the supervisor takes no action, the employee can and should contact the Audit Committee.

    Professional integrity demands that one do this.

    If the audit committee does not act, then the entire edifice is rotten and one should leave before it collapses. Sending a copy of one's complaint to the local police, industry regulators, SEC, etc, will then land the entire audit committee in very deep shit.

    [1] Because in WorldCom the CFO was cooking the books and all routes for complaints about cooked books, like the audit committee, went through the CFO. This SPOF has been removed.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
  122. Two words: Whistleblower laws by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

    THere is protection for people in your position called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower#Legal_p rotection_for_whistleblowerswhistleblower laws that can help protect you against any retaliation.

    --
    -- My Sig is a P228.
    1. Re:Two words: Whistleblower laws by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      THere is protection for people in your position called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower#Legal_p rotection_for_whistleblowerswhistleblower laws that can help protect you against any retaliation.

      Nice concept, but most whistle blowers go through hell for a long time before they get protection, if they get it at all.

      Job loss, unemployability, marital problems, etc. are all the price they pay for doing the right thing. I'm not saying we should simply go along with what we know is wrong but to expect the legal system to protect you is a pipe dream. It may, but not until you've been beaten pretty badly.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  123. Ignore the law. Support your employer. by Simonetta · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You work for your employer. They pay you. You make more money for them with the work that you do than they pay you. Inform them about better alternatives to the programs that they are using and how you can improve their IT processes. Don't tell them that they are 'breaking the law'. Then install the software and go back to your work.

        I personally have serious reservations about what passes for law. I'm not a criminal or an anarcharist. I am one of the twenty five million Americans who have been arrested for possession of herbal intoxicant cannibus and can point out many instances of having suffered discrimination as a result. This experience has led me to real-word realization that most of what passes for law is just bullshit designed to keep someone rich. And that especially applies to any law related to software.

        You're a software developer and I'm ripping you off and taking food out the mouths of your children? I don't care. Go be a plumber. No one needs you to be a software developer. If there is a need for the software, then someone will write it. If I need it then I'll copy it. That bothers you? Grow up. Software is common good. Copying it, using it, modifing it is not a crime.

        Again I don't do crimes. I don't murder (I'm not one of the troops that we are endlessly told to support). I don't steal (I've never used my position as a company executive to short sell the company stock and backrupt the pension fund of my employees, like MANY of the big buck campaign contributers to the current rack of sleezeball politicians). I've don't rape (I'm from Providence and our former mayor raped, admitted it, laughed, and walked away untouchable).

        I do copy software. I do it at work if it can improve my personal productivity. I am used to my text editor and my user interface configuration. Ditto my graphics image processing software. I'm not going to learn yours. If my company won't buy it and install it for my use, then I do it myself. I'm too old and worldwise to give a shit about whether someone has a problem with this. I don't care.

        Fortunately nearly all of the companies that I have worked for have the same realistic perspective on this issue. They want me to be productive. They want me to be discrete. So I'm productive and discrete. Everybody's happy.

        If you boss wants you to install ten thousand copys of BozoWord on the corporate network, just do it.

  124. Re:Ask Slashdot: How do I act on principle? by LaurieDash · · Score: 1

    I agree. I thought the whole point of principles was that they were fundamental. They should govern what you do in situations like this. If they don't and you get confused they're not REALLY principles are they. It's like those idiotic vegetarions that have turkey "just at christmas".

  125. IMPORTANT by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 1

    Please read the children of the parent post, especially the polite ones.
    Also note that the EULA terms for Office change subtly and critically from version to version.
    Current Office versions demand an application license exist "per device".

    Now I remember why we have a drawer full of old Office licenses that are no longer installed.

  126. You're not alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company I work for do it, they even know that it's wrong (i.e. saying things like "I don't know what you're installing *wink* *wink*"). The frustrating thing is that the sort of applications we have illegitimately installed are for the most part vital to our job, for example the Macromedia suite of applications (Fireworks, Flash, Dreamweaver specifically).

    I can think of at least 5 other enterprise class applications that are installed on several PCs in our organisation that are used daily and considered integral to the operation of the business, which have been downloaded from newsgroups and activated using keygens, etc.

    Ironically the Directors will stump up the cash for software that they want to steal one of the licences for themselves for their own equipment (e.g. they bought Photoshop CS3 as it comes with a 2-machine licence, one for the actual member of staff that needs it and a copy for the Director). I have to use CS2 (also legit) right now simply because the Director took priority over the 2nd CS3 copy, but that's by the by.

    I don't think it's a unique phenomenon, particularly in small businesses who are trying to shave margins everywhere they can.

  127. Not if I knew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years ago, I worked for a local computer builder/retailer and they ordered copies of Win98 from a distributor. The discs came with certs of authenticity and books. Shortly before I left that company, I learned that they were bogus. A week after I was gone, I fired off a web form to the BSA and to Microsoft.

    Remember, most piracy is discovered because of disgruntled former employees. So, unless your company has none of those, don't even think about installing the software.

    As others have said, do your best to get the demand documented and move a copy of that outside of the company's control. When/If you refuse to break the law, let them know that you've documented the illegal request. Either this is the action of one rogue manager and he wouldn't dare to retaliate or if it's company policy they may try to fabricate a reason to dismiss you. Don't be afraid to go public. It would hurt them more and potentially make you known to a new employer.

  128. Go BOFH by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    BOFH ethics trump PHB ethics.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  129. Re:It Depends on Your Character by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    What settlement would that be? Unemployment?

    In the US there are very, very few positions you cannot be fired from for no reason at all. There are reasons they cannot fire people for, but there are no limits on firing people for no reason at all.

  130. It never changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over a decade ago I worked at a place where my boss had her husband doing "unofficial" repair work. This work included things like taking new parts home for himself and installing old used ones, along with pirated user licenses. Reporting this to her superior only made me look like an insubordinate employee who was trying to make sour grapes. My advice is do the same as I did; document it, get the hell out of there, and then report them for piracy.

  131. You are complicit if caught by rholland356 · · Score: 1

    You really have to have a discussion with the management. Take your stones to that meeting, you'll need them.

    Here's the deal--if your company is caught doing the crime, it is your fingerprints on the keyboard, no matter how many written directives you have. You are complicit because you did the deed, AND you have a responsibility to your company to protect it from exposure to criminal activity.

    I recommend that you not offer technical options. Instead, spend your time explaining how Microsoft tracks down dirty little license cheats, and how they enforce payment. Bring case studies of companies that are similar to yours that have lost a license fight. It is your job to make management understand the true risk and consequence of violating the law--don't assume they understand at all.

    That's YOUR JOB, Mr. IT Guy. It comes with the territory, so suck it up and do your duty, or sure as shit, your job will be sent to India.

    1. Re:You are complicit if caught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I'm in the US Air Force and recently finished leading my organization through a software compliance audit. The Air Force is getting very anal retentive about software piracy--primarily because we've been getting sued (successfully) by the major software publishers for piracy. If Bill Gates will take on the US Gov't, what is he willing to do to you?

      Your comptroller should know better -- as my wife would say "A fish rots from the head" -- the rest of the corporate leadership team is probably just as unethical. Time to get out, and be sure to drop a dime with the BSA and MS.

    2. Re:You are complicit if caught by rholland356 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't quit the job--I'd take another approach first.

      Why not approach all first-level managers and state the facts. Let them allocate the licenses that are legitimate. Make the department heads decide how they will supply licenses to their users, or if they will try other products, such as Google's documents apps.

      Turn up the heat on the manager who stonewalls. You might as well, because he will either force you to his will, or replace you with someone else. At least you leave having created a basis for his ouster.

      Whatever action you choose, it is the IT Guy's responsibility.

  132. Citrix by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    This is probably a dumb question, but is Citrix even required? Assuming that the s/w is installed on a Windows server, can't the clients connect to the server via Remote Desktop and run the apps on the server?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Citrix by Raideen · · Score: 1

      Citrix isn't required unless you want to publish applications (although I believe that there are other third party alternatives). You'd need the server license and install terminal services in application mode (as opposed to remote administration mode). Then you'd need a license for each user (all users that use the server, not just concurrent users) and a license for each user using Office. The GP's solution is apparently to combat piracy with more piracy. Now, if you replaced the desktops with thin clients and actually paid for the software licenses, they could potentially save money by paying for the software but spending less on the hardware.

  133. A random idea... by Hennell · · Score: 1

    Don't know how well this could work, but you could try spoofing an e-mail or faking a phone call or letter from a Anti-Piracy Organisation or just from Microsoft themselves. Give them the impression that someone official will be conducting a 'regular' random check on their software licences, and the installing question will probably go away.

    Of course another insane idea might be to install the software but add a virus to the mix. Then when it deletes and messes up everything, blame the pirated software. I'd guess that'd change company policy....

    Of course, making your (and the laws) position known, is a far better plan. If your boss asked you to kill someone, or take drugs or whatever your wouldn't, this shouldn't be any different.
    ---
    Surly the amount of room it takes to swing a cat is highly variable based on the size of the cat, the length of your arms and whether you swing it by its paws or tail...
    ---

  134. Re: Pirated software by jgotts · · Score: 1

    I would find a new job immediately. Your employers are telling you to steal, and your reputation is on the line when they get caught.

  135. Don't do it by valley · · Score: 1

    At the end of the day, your own personal ethics outrank any job. Stand up for what you believe. Period. You'll have enough regrets in life; at the least, behave honorably in everything you do.

  136. Re:Ask Slashdot: How do I act on principle? by DietCoke · · Score: 0

    Honestly, if you are really an "IT Professional", you would know that installing pirated software at work is FAR less than professional.

    Live up to the standard, don't pull it down to suit your employer.

  137. You are a professional..... by pembury · · Score: 1

    Don't install unlicensed copies of software put it writing why you won't - I saw a very good email pro-forma earlier in the comments DO! maintain a complete itemised diary of all contacts with your superiors on this subject and any other topic that YOU FEEL results from your stand on this If you can afford it, seek legal advice and keep a copy of the diary records with them

  138. Mod grampa down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent post is correct and grandparent post is thus not interesting, insightful, or whatever else. It's implying something that's false, and should be modded down.

  139. How smart are these guys? by dalesc · · Score: 0

    Compile your own version of OpenOffice.org with all occurances to the name changed to Microsoft Excel, Word or whatever. Replace the splash screen and tell them it's a special new version from Micrsosoft especially for cheapskates.

  140. A few suggestions... by Valar · · Score: 1

    If your company is large enough to have a legal department, contact them. They'll be better able to convey to management the amount of liability the company is being exposed to. If your company is publically traded and SOX compliant, there are anonymous whistleblower numbers to contact. If not, make it known to a variety of management people "in an effort to get conformation" then report them to the BSA. Then deny, deny, deny when they claim it is you (since everyone else knows too, it could be anyone in the chain of command that ratted the company out). If they still fire you, sue them for wrongful dismissal and reap a year or two of free no work salary.

  141. Union by srobert · · Score: 1

    When I was asked by an employer to do something that could make me liable for damages, I did what you suggested. My boss was unwilling to put in writing what he wanted me to do. They didn't put it in writing so I didn't do it. I got away with it. I think the reason I got away with it was because I was a union member working under a union contract. Alas, in the United States today, most workers are "at-will" employees without union protection. If I had pulled a stunt like that in a non-union shop, I'd have most likely been sent down the road. My advice to the original poster would be just do as your told and turn them in anonymously.

    1. Re:Union by Tom · · Score: 1

      Might be. And yes, very few bosses will give you the order in writing if there is even a slim chance that it might come back to haunt them.

      As I said: My legal training is for Germany, which has stronger employee-protection laws than the US does.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  142. Three things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Look for a new job. Do not work for unethical people any longer than you need to.
    2) While looking install the pirated software without making a fuss about it. Making a fuss about it by documenting your concerns could result in you either getting fired and/or being blamed for the illegal copies. Either way you lose.
    3) After finding the new job and starting it, send an anonymous letter to SPA or whoever, documenting the number of installations verses the number licensed.

  143. Piracy for profit is way wrong by Geof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think most people pirate at least some software and home, and so some may say it's hypocritical to say the things I've said here knowing that, but there's a distinction to be made between what you do at home and being professional at work. No one has to know what you get upto at home, and so the risk is more controlled

    I want to add to this that I find the moral implications to be of a different order altogether. It's one thing to violate copyright privately, quite another to do so in order to make a profit.

    Moreover, companies are granted special protections and rights by the government. To balance this, they are expected to compete in the market. They must follow consistent rules in order for that competition to be (remotely) fair. Even if the law is broken and wrong (as I believe copyright is), that is not a sufficient justification for a business to take it upon itself to play fast and loose with the law. (Other justifications - such as important political or cultural speech, lifesaving treatment, artistic merit, or the ridiculously untenable position Digg just found itself in - may have merit. Profit does not.)

    I know many small developers and web designers pirate their tools. I don't feel comfortable judging them; neither do I think it's my job to police big companies who can afford to pay but cheat anyway. But for myself, as a professional software developer (and no fan of Microsoft) I have spent thousands of dollars on Microsoft tools. I knew that I would not be comfortable with my actions, or feel my criticism of copyright to be wholly legitimate, if I did otherwise.

    Now I develop free software, because that's what I believe in. The high cost of proprietary software only reinforces the advantages of the open model. When companies play by the rules, free and open source software wins.

  144. That is not your problem to solve by CuteAlien · · Score: 1

    I suppose you also want to keep your job. Maybe even more important you don't want to be known as the guy who refuses to do something so trivial to help the company just because your such an law-abiding jerk. Maybe even most of the other people in the company know about that stuff and no one seems to care about it beside yourself?

    Bad news:
    You can't just install OpenOffice - that won't do it.

    Good news:
    It is not your problem to solve and this is exactly the point you can tell your superiors. They are trying to move a problem to you which is actually theirs. Tell them you can't do that and ask them to find another way to solve the budget constrains. You can bring up OpenOffice at a point when they try to nail you at the wall. Not as the perfect solution (it ain't in a MS-Office environment), but as something which might help them to get by for the moment, if they find absolutly no way to pay for original licenses. You might even get prepared for that talk and do before that some compatibility tests with typical documents of your company. Test if documents are screwed up, do macros no longer work etc. Do not avoid talking about the problems which can arise when switching to OO. Now they know their choices, that installing illegal copies is none of those choices and the decision what to do is back at them.

  145. Not an entirely bad situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously you shouldn't do it, but think about it this way. By refusing to do it, you also kind of get a bonus: you basically have a free pass for the next few years. They'd have to be pretty stupid to fire you, for any reason, since you can then sue and say "I was fired for not doing something wrong." And while unfortunately your ascension through the ranks might be slowed by the incident, hopefully that time (where they really can't fire you) will be long enough to find a job where you're not managed by people so unscrupulous.

  146. Ethics. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    What you're doing is contrary to your own morals, and against commonly held professional ethics for your trade. Tell them that breeching those morals could make you lose your licenses. Then remind them that they could lose their own professional licenses, and thousands of dollars, if they continue this illegal and immoral path.

    Sure, they can fire you, and you can tell your story, and I'm sure the police, the labour board, and the copyright owners would all be very interested to hear how you were fired for refusing to break civil and criminal law.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  147. No, I wouldn't by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

    Hi -

    No way in hell would I follow this directive. If you are a public company (i.e. traded on a US stock exchange), I would do the following:

    1. I would communicate, in writing, in a notarized communication that I will not follow an order to break a law and that I expect that my company will comply with applicable employment law and not retaliate against me for my refusal.

    Get a the notary to notarize that the copy of the letter you have is the same as the original you presented to them. What you want is a record of the letter which you submitted.

    In this letter I would also communicate my recommendation to either license Office (find the most economical way to do it) or install OpenOffice.

    I would be sure to detail in this letter the details of the order to break a law. Who gave it, when, the reason they gave me, etc.

    2. I would send a copy of this letter to the Whistle Blower hot line for your company along with the Board of Directors.

    3. Send all copies by registered mail. Get that receipt with the signature on it.

    If you are a private company, I would:

    1. I would communicate, in writing, in a notarized communication that I will not follow an order to break a law and that I expect that my company will comply with applicable employment law and not retaliate against me for my refusal.

    Get a the notary to notarize that the copy of the letter you have is the same as the original you presented to them. What you want is a record of the letter which you submitted.

    In this letter I would also communicate my recommendation to either license Office (find the most economical way to do it) or install OpenOffice.

    I would be sure to detail in this letter the details of the order to break a law. Who gave it, when, the reason they gave me, etc.
    I would be sure and detail in this letter the details of the order to break a law.

    2. Send all copies by registered mail. Get that receipt with the signature on it.

    If you end up getting fired or a "hostile workplace" is created, I would:

    1. Send a letter to both your state department of labor and the Federal EDD outlining the situation and including a copy of the communication.

    2. Contact the BSA with the details of the situation.

    3. Retain an employment attorney and go after a big settlement.

    And no matter where you are, I would start looking for a job. A company that will break the law to control expenses is going to do it in other places. You don't want to be there when it blows up.

    Yours,

    Jordan

  148. They cant force you to install illegal software by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

    I had the same problem a couple of years back. I had them sign a document stating that they are in fact aware that they are installing illegal software and not to hold me responsible in case any action was taken against the company. If the give you grief because of that you really need to find another job.

  149. I think by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Microsoft have a webpage where you can anonymously report licencing violations.
    Just do that then you can sit at your desk at work one day and watch Microsoft stormtroopers break your office door down and butt-rape your controller, safe in the knowledge that he'll never find out who squealed.

  150. I wouldn't by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    As a matter of fact I wouldn't install any software. Mostly because I don't have to, lately with all those USB disks and things like portableapps you don't really have to install anything on others' computers.

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  151. You already know what you should do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, do you need the job? Sure... everyone says to quit. But, they aren't the ones supporting a wife, two kids, a dog, and a mortgage banker. If that's your situation, install the software as you were ordered. Try to document that it was some elses decision as much as possible. At the end of the day, it's the business owner that is liable for this (but, IANAL). If you really don't like it, that's understandable. Good for you for having ethics. It's time to find another (better) job, but on YOUR timeline and on one where you can still take care of your more important commitments. As much as possible... keep everything quiet. Including your reasons for leaving. Just like you might not want a spouse with a lot of "baggage". Employers aren't that interested in employees with baggage (whether it's your fault or not).

  152. How do you handle it? by Cervantes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How do you handle it?

    Step 1) Document your concerns. How many installs are needed, how many are unlicensed, etc
    Step 2) Document your correspondence with your controller. Send them an email explaining (a) that unlicensed software is wrong and can result in large fines for the company (b) that you are aware of unlicensed software (c) it will cost $X to bring the company up to spec and (d) how they would like you to proceed. If they pull the Manager trick of verbally discussing the answer with you, follow up by emailing them a summary ("I want to be sure I clearly understand from our recent conversation...")
    Step 3) If the issue is still unresolved, bring it up with the owners/president. "Dear Mr President, we are exposed to possible fines, I haven't been able to find a solution, and I am concerned for the welfare of the company"
    Step 4) If the owner isn't willing to do anything... call the BSA (or whatever the software authority is in your area)

    These 4 steps follow the chain of command, cover your a$$ if they try to blame you for it, and will eventually result in the right thing happening. If you're lucky, they'll realize they were in the wrong, and they'll correct things. If you're fired, hopefully there's a whistleblowers statute in your area. If there isn't... at least you're not working there anymore.

    The mere fact that you'd bring up this issue says that you're not comfortable with it. So don't do it. No job is worth your self-respect.

    (Of course, there's always "Option B"... just buy the damn licenses (or have them billed to the company), don't give them the option of not purchasing more. License purchasing is suddenly a part of the process. "What's that? Install Office on Bobs machine? Why, no problem! I'll just go call our vendor, buy a license number, and be right back!")

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  153. Re:Just watch your back!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But they can easily make something up. The employer might say he has bad B.O. They don't have to prove it, they can say its their subjective judgement and its still valid. It is possible the employer is completely unaware of such lax labor laws, and will goof up, but I wouldn't count on it. You really would have to start wearing a wire, and an independent paperwork trail as well.

  154. If you're a mercenary... by thewiz · · Score: 1

    1. Install the software as requested.
    2. Find a new job.
    3. Call the BSA and report your former employer.
    4. Profit by collecting the reward from the BSA.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  155. Re:It Depends on Your Character by geekoid · · Score: 1

    well...no.
    All you need to do is convince a jury that you were fired for breaking the law.

    If you ahve documentation, I would think an out of court settlement wuold happen. IOtherwise it will come to the attention of the SEC and the BSA.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  156. Fall on Your Sword for Microsoft's Enrichment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand how you might feel about the rule of law, but ultimately this boils down to you developing a contentious relationship with your employer, who may or may not continue to pay your meager salary, in order to protect the continued prosperity of Bill Gates, et al.

  157. Hard choices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike a lot of other posters, I recognize this situation, and thus recognize how hard of a position you are in. The ethical and utopian part of all of us says "quit the job", but I also know that this isn't utopia, bills need to be paid, and if you have a family, you're just as responsible for keeping food on the table. Doing what's right and being the hero isn't always the easiest thing to do.

    Either way you look at it, you're in for a loss though. If you go and install things without second questioning, you may be in legal trouble later down the road. If you keep questioning it and escalating the issue, your work place may become very uncomfortable very fast.

    If you don't what to quit your job, but you want at least a small bit of conscious that you at least tried (and a bit more security when the brown stuff hits the fan), here is what I would do.

    Send your boss (or more hopefully bosses, if there is more than 1 superior) e-mail specifically laying out the issues on hand, and making it clear (but polite) that they are asking you to do something illegal. Let them know that you DO want to continue working at your job, but that you do find it very uncomfortable to be required to break the law. You've probably already done this, but if it was verbal, do it again with e-mail. BCC your personal account on this one, and keep the records! (That's why I insist on something in writing, not verbal.) Don't bother mentioning OpenOffice or other OSS alternatives, it's probably not your job to bend backwards finding legal solutions to illegal decisions the company made, and more often than not, insisting that there IS a solution can get you in more trouble, however irrational the reasoning behind it is.

    Now at this point, with a written record on hand, it's more likely than not that the boss will prefer to take matters in his/her own hands and escalate the issue. He/She is just as likely to get blamed by the company if they get sued. But, if he doesn't, I would just play along and install the illegal copies. IF the BSA takes a particular interest in your company and decides to audit, and the later sue, that single e-mail could be a life/death difference. You still did something illegal, and just because your boss told you to doesn't make you exempt of any laws, BUT, judges are usually understanding of such circumstances and who is REALLY to blame.

    Now that I said that, I have one more suggestion. If you don't have one already, think hard about it and start working on an "oh shit!" savings. Regardless of your profession, you NEED to have financial funds to support yourself, hopefully for at least 6 months, without a job. That's so that if you get laid off, fired, or find that the illegal demands of your employers are becoming untollerable, you can drop everything and have peace of mind that you won't go begging on the streets tomorrow. You may even need to use part of it for legal counseling if things get really bad.

  158. Been there... Left there... by rmallico · · Score: 1

    I worked for a small family owned (publicly traded) oil/gas exploration company down in Texas for about a year.. Came in and the guy there was farming all IT work out to the local consulting firm... I got them off of NetBEUI (yes, NetBEUI) and on to IP and setup DNS/WINS/DHCP... I also took them off of WorkGroup PostOffice (ouch) and also managed to upgrade them to Windows 95 and Office 95 or whatever the heck it was back then... in doing my assessment i came across the fact that we did NOT have licenses for more than 25 pc's and yet we had 250 employees... I did the math, submitted it to the CIO and he said it was a calculated risk they were willing to take.. even though the OS/Office licenses would not have totaled 75k and the penalties at the time would have been over 300k... i left about 2 weeks later after rolling out Exchange and upgrading their desktops (Finished my task) and went on... I still to this day have the email that he wrote me back with the 'calculated risk' in the return... found it on an old 20GB DAT tape going through things to chuck into a garage sale box...

    what an arse...

    --
    sig goes here!
  159. 1. Start looking for a new job. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    2. Get the order to violate copyright and patent law, plus violate license agreements, in writing. You write it out. Get your boss to sign it. Make sure it explicitly states that the boss is choosing to break the law. Tell the boss that he has asked you to break the law, and you will only do so if he signs it. If he threatens to fire you, remind him that the law protects the jobs of those who refuse to violate the law. If he signs, go to 3. If he gives in, then you're okay. If he fires you, go to 5.

    3. Write the owners or every member of the board of directors, as appropriate for the type of company. If they give in, you're okay. If not, go to 4. If they fire you, go to 5.

    4. If they still insist, do it, then write the BSA. I can't stand them, but you can get reward large enough to keep you happily unemployed for a year or more while you search for a better company to work for. If you get fired, still go to 5. Otherwise, feel happy that you have punished stupid management.

    5. If you are fired for refusing to break the law, contact a local employment attorney. You have an open-and-shut case. He/she will work on contingency, meaning you won't pay up front, (s)he'll just take a percentage of the settlement/judgement.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
    1. Re:1. Start looking for a new job. by steveoc · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but make sure that in step 3) when you write to the owners of the company, that there are alternatives such as OpenOffice, which make this whole problem go away in the first place.

      In fact, explain how by converting the whole operation away from the Microsoft treadmill, they can prevent this whole thing from ever happening again, reduce all OS licencing costs to zero, AND slash the IT headcount dramatically by replacing the whole IT department with a small handfull of competant linux admins.

      Then watch the revolution begin ...

      AFTER that is successful, you can resign gracefully, and find another company who needs to be transformed into another Linux success story.

  160. Re:Don't make this about open source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Lose the opensource label and just say an alternative was offered. Knowledgeable people who favor open source might understand the relevance, but it will only confuse everyone else, perhaps even weaken and undermine your case. This is a legal issue, not an appropriate forum for expounding the benefits of an alternative software model that few understand or appreciate.

  161. Time to post your resume by jimab · · Score: 1

    If they're not willing to spend the money on necessary tools, then what else are they not willing to spend money on? Maintenance contracts? Training? Your next raise?

    Post your resume and beat feet.

  162. losing email by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

    Obviously before pulling the trigger on something like this you'd compile a CYA paper trail, and have at least one copy off-site.

  163. Keyserver by norkakn · · Score: 1

    You should do what you think is right. "just doing my job" isn't an exuse. If your job is incompatible with your beliefs, you should quite (i.e. pharmacist who won't hand out birth control) but that does not seem to be the case here. I doubt they'd fire you for putting your foot down, and if so, you'd win in court.

    Productively, you might want to look at http://sassafras.com/.

  164. Centralize the Install... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

    If you centralize the install then you can bypass a chunk of licensing fees, as only a % of users will be using the applications from the server install at a certain time.

    Also if you turn them in, MS will probably not do much other than make them legalize their licensing needs. MS tends to only go after large corporate 1000+ installs or reseller pirates, most companies just get asked for licensing fees.

  165. G-unit by Zero_Independent · · Score: 0

    Shit nigga, if somebody offered me money to whack somebody the first question I'd ask is, "How much are going to pay me?". You're being given the opportunity to commit crimes for a living and you're bitching about it? You need to grow a spine. Tell your boss, "If you're gonna upgrade me to being a gangster I want more money. And don't give me stupid capers like pirating software. I wanna be an enforcer. Beat up people. Intimidate people. That sort of thing."

    Then when the police come down on everyone I'd just say, "So what I pirated? Everyone does it."

    You need to relax homey. People commit crimes all the time. It's no big deal. You're being given an opportunity to be a professional criminal. I suggest you take it. You gangster dawg!

  166. Quitting is best. by twitter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ethics is further down the list of things to be true to than survival. Especially since we're talking about something as abstract as violating a copyright.

    No, we're talking about not being someone else's bagman and the risks that involves. The problem here is that the boss is transferring the risk his company is taking to the employee. If something goes wrong he's screwed and won't have the option of another job he has now. If the company is caught and he's blamed, he'll end up washing dishes for a living.

    I've worked with convicted felons and they all deeply regret their convictions. Their crimes were petty but it has locked them out of all sorts of honest work. The few people who hire them do so because they know they can squeeze that much harder. This makes life harder for them than you and me.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Quitting is best. by The13thSin · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure this applies to US law as well, but it applies to most laws in the western world: if you have proved as an employee that you were "forced" to do something (or didn't know what you were ordered to do) is illegal, the company is the one who's F-ed. Actually, in almost any liability case, the company is the one that gets F-ed, so what you are saying is simply not true.

      I'd recommend the guy in this situation to document the mails or whatever and just go along... it's just not worth your job to go all righteous over something as trivial as copyright infringement.

      --
      "This should be fun, and by fun, I mean a wholly depressing insight into the cognitive ability of some grown adults."
    2. Re:Quitting is best. by Silver+Gryphon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the current legal environment in the U.S. doesn't consider much trivial, at least when good lawyers are involved.

      In most cases, the law will state that the employee is the one that pushed the Install button and therefore is at least an accomplice. Unless the employee can prove beyond hearsay (i.e., in writing) the threat of being fired or otherwise harmed, the employee is seen as having free will. The phrase, "I was only following orders" just doesn't cut it.

      Also the current legal environment discourages companies from hiring someone who has the slightest blemish on their legal record. That, and someone known to have ratted out or sued their former employer. Even at an honest company, the hiring manager usually doesn't want to risk anything when two qualified people are up for the same job.

      So it's a catch-22... stay and violate copyright, or leave and report the problem, possibly being blacklisted? Or leave and fail to report, leaving the problem to someone else? I've faced the same dilemma myself and responded differently based on the circumstances.

      In the end, it's best to be up front and polite about the licensing; management may simply be oblivious to the license fees. Getting them to agree to a 500-machine deployment is a lot easier if someone forgets to mention the per-PC license. Once they've committed, they may feel like they can wait a year to get the licenses up to date. When they're backed into a corner, you'd be surprised how management justifies these things, as if it's a line of credit. One violation leads to another, and it can get out of hand. Like driving on the interstate at 120mph... 5 years, no accidents, so it's safe, right?

    3. Re:Quitting is best. by The13thSin · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that comment, very thorough and interesting. But I think I might've wrote my argument down wrong.

      What I mean is that, the employer is the first one to be liabel, and only if they can give sufficiant prove (which is normally very hard) it wasn't them but someone else, they can get off the hook. Not the other way around. So allthough not without risk, I'd say it's safer than most imagine.

      --
      "This should be fun, and by fun, I mean a wholly depressing insight into the cognitive ability of some grown adults."
    4. Re:Quitting is best. by cduffy · · Score: 1

      At least here in Texas, unless you make a deal with the prosecutor, you don't get off the hook; you just get other people onto it. There's no concept of an "accomplice" here -- if you were involved in the crime, you're responsible for it as much as the person who pulled the trigger up until sentencing comes up (at which point you can argue how minimally you were involved). Think about what you're arguing here: Let's say your boss tells you to steal a car, and that he'll fire you if you don't. Do you honestly think that the fact that you were just following orders would get you off?

      In civil cases, more than one defendant can be named -- and if your company is too cheap to pay for their own software, do you think they're going to have their lawyer defend you as well? (Further, if they go bust and the corporate veil can't be pierced, that leaves you as the only remaining defendant -- and that's a lousy position to be in).

      In short, I would be extremely skeptical of any attempts to leverage your line of reasoning -- particularly now that copyright violation is in many cases a criminal rather than civil act -- without first consulting with a competent lawyer.

    5. Re:Quitting is best. by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Convicted felon? for installing a few overlicensed products? right.....

      I agree with the quiting part, but they will fine the organization, no criminal proceedings will EVER occur over some licenses at a company (unless your company is counterfeiting them for resale of course)

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    6. Re:Quitting is best. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      The easy way to avoid this is to email your boss the license count required for this project. Tell him you are readying a script to perform this install (Please GOD tell me your not doing it manually...). State that you assume he will have enough licenses on hand. I'm the network admin, I don't deal with the legal or political ramifications of my duties. My job is to make things work. I let me boss handle the license buying, if he says we have 100 licenses I assume we do, if he says he bought 50 more, I add them to my spreadsheet.

      That's why managers make more, they are the ones that decide whether or not to assume the risk of using pirated software. I just implement solutions. I do try to verify licenses, but it's easy to document what you have done to verify licensing. If it's an email to the boss and an affirmative answer, that's enough for me.

      If the boss blatantly tells me pirate software I will politely decline and give him alternatives. I treat this like a project and deliver a several page writeup outlining our options w/ costs for each.

    7. Re:Quitting is best. by The13thSin · · Score: 1

      Right, I didn't mean criminal charges offcourse... But it's still a civil case, even in the USA right? I mean it's the copyrightholder or some RIAA like organization that charges you, not the local police / fbi, isn't it?

      --
      "This should be fun, and by fun, I mean a wholly depressing insight into the cognitive ability of some grown adults."
    8. Re:Quitting is best. by cduffy · · Score: 1

      But it's still a civil case, even in the USA right?

      There's a reason US movie releases start with an "FBI Warning": The US has both civil and criminal copyright infringement; the latter applies (among other situations) if the infringed material is exchanged for anything of value (explicitly including other pirated works). A prosecutor could argue that taking actions which infringe copyright as part of one's job duties constitutes infringing copyright in exchange for something of value (one's paycheck). I'm not a lawyer (just a hobbyist), so I'm not much inclined to speculate on how such a case would turn out -- but again, it's not worth the risk.

      Also, a civil case could easily name both the corporation and the directly responsible individuals within it -- so banking on the company to take the hit exclusively is not a good idea.

  167. It depends by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    It depends on whether you think breaking the law is worth keeping your job.

            Brett

  168. Re:Ignore the law. Support your employer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't entirely disagree.

    However when you say If you boss wants you to install ten thousand copys of BozoWord on the corporate network, just do it.,

    that's not exactly discrete.

  169. maybe not the best LEGAL advice here, but by v1 · · Score: 1

    what I would do is demand they sign a waiver saying that installing the software is a requirement of my job and that either they have licenses enough to cover the installations or they are accepting full responsibility for any infringement that results from your actions.

    If they refuse to sign it, don't do it. If they fire you, you will have a fun time with them in court. Maybe not the most solid legal ground, but good enough for me I think.

    A widely-held opinion about software is that people install pirated software because they would never buy it if pirating were not an option. These people can somewhat justify their decision because the company has not lost anything by your action. (commonly cited, "copyright infringement is NOT theft") Businesses on the other hand usually have a budget limited only by what the mangement deems is acceptable expense, so they cannot fall into that category in most cases. For this reason I expect businesses to pony up for their software, and I perfer to follow the "try before you buy" model for my personal software. I own several licenses of software I have deemed worth the asking price and useful, and several other titles I am still deciding on. I've reviewed waaay too much crap and have been extremely thankful to not be out my "software is non returnable" $49.95 each time they bait me into garbage.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  170. 0. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    0. Talk to an attorney about options.

    It might be as simple as your attorney contacting the companies attorny. Problem solved.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  171. Don't do it and don't quit by razpones · · Score: 1

    Make sure you have the order to install the pirate software in writing and then just plain refuse. Then if they fire you for disobeying you have a case to sue them. If they don't then just start looking for a better job, since they have showed that they suck. Quitting is not something you need to do since you can wait to see if there can be a liquidation and unemployment in your future (read vacation).

  172. You have done your duty... by TaleSpinner · · Score: 1

    You have informed them they are committing a crime. They have ordered you to do it, at least implicitly threatening your job if you fail to do it. They bought the package to be pirated, they own the computers it's pirated to. You are legally in the clear. Especially if you are willing to testify for the prosecution at your company's RICO trial.

    Face it, copyright holders never ask "who's responsible" for pirating. All they care about is "who to sue". Your pockets are just nowhere near as deep as your employer's. So, let 'em suffer. God knows they asked for it. Quite literally.

  173. Ethics by oldgeezer1954 · · Score: 1


    There are lots of neats idea being given to you, some of which I might not mind trying myself if I could.

    But the bottom line is that if you are a professional then you do the ethical thing. It's not a huge issue beyond that. Ethics are one of the many things that defines what being a professional is.

    Well except for lawyers...

    Hmm and accountants....

    Fad doctors...

    Oh screw it, install the damn pirated software and then once it's done blackmail the tightwads in exchange for not turning them in.

    There, that feels better.

  174. Quit to avoid blame. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Why offer to quit? I'm pretty sure its illegal to fire someone because they won't break the law. Just offer to install Open Office or nothing at all.

    You need to quit because the boss will blame you anyway.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Quit to avoid blame. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Blame you for what? Offering advice on the company's IT needs? Thats sort of what IT professionals are paid to do.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  175. no no NO by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Piracy is not..oh wait a minute you said 'crime' and not 'stealing'.
    huh.
    well that's correct then. well done.

    my bad. Continue with your regular scheduled meme.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:no no NO by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      Well it is theft in means of intelectual propery. But regarding the law it is not theft. I don't know about other but in Polish law you can't really steal something that is not physicaly existant (like software copy) and you can't steal something that is not movable (like house).

  176. Please let us know by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    what happens with this.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  177. Re:Ignore the law. Support your employer. by fyngyrz · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This experience has led me to real-word realization that most of what passes for law is just bullshit designed to keep someone rich.

    ...another function is to maintain a powerbase, partially religious, partially straight power. Sorry to hear you were a direct victim of the war against personal liberty.

    "I don't steal"... I do copy software. I do it at work if it can improve my personal productivity ... Ditto my graphics image processing software.

    You couldn't "steal" ours even if you wanted to, because we refuse to consider you a pirate. :)

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  178. Not like I'm a lawyer or anything, but... by kuriharu · · Score: 1

    I don't imagine you'd have any repercussions against you personally. Yes, you're the tech that actually installed it, but a.) you mentioned that it was illegal and b.) authority isn't really yours in matters like this. What's more, it's unlikely that criminal charges would be filed, so at worst you're looking at your company getting fined. And it's true that the software alliance people threaten people but it's been a loong time since I've heard of a company getting audited and sued.

    In other words, they need to comply with the law, but there probably won't be any real consequences for this.

  179. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Refuse to perform the installs and instead tell your boss that someone else will have to do it. If they continue to push it, ask them to draft up a full indemnity contract between you and your place of work for any and all legal fees and awards.

    I sincerely hope your place of work is not pushing this on you. I have seen small and large businesses get hit by software piracy claims and it is not a good thing.

    Either way, good luck to you. I hope it all comes out okay.

    Sometimes I wish people in management positions over IT departments were not quite so ignorant.

    Of course, then IT folks would not have jobs . . . .

  180. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. (and DOCUMENT) by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Document, document document - as in keep track of all communications and don't do any of it verbally. If you have verbal communications, email the parties involved with a conversation summary saying, "This is the summary of ourcoversation as I recall it. Please append comments or corrections if you believe them necessary".

    One approach is to ask them to sign an affidavit stating you are doing this because told to, and that all parties recognize the illegality of it. If they fire you as a result of your "attitude", you probably have a case for taking them to court for illegal termination.

    What ever you end up doing though, I'd get out of there ASAP.

  181. Just Say No by jonadab · · Score: 1

    "I can't do that. It's illegal."

    That's all you have to say. If they say, "Do it anyway", all you say is, "I can't do that, it's illegal" or perhaps "You can't legally ask me to do that." (This covers *any* illegal action an employer may ask you to take. I went through this once when I was asked to falsify records, for instance.)

    I'm assuming here that you haven't _already_ compromised yourself by committing illegal actions. If you have already done so, then the moral and legal high ground are probably lost to you and you probably need to seek other employment. But if your own nose is clean, you have the legal right (indeed, obligation) to keep it that way.

    What they will probably then do is get somebody else to do it instead. Theoretically they might fire you, but it's unlikely and would put them on shaky ground with such bodies as the Department of Labor (assuming you live in the US), to say nothing of the bad press they would stand to sustain if you went to the newspapers. Much more likely they'll get somebody else to do it and ask you to just look the other way.

    Then you have to figure out whether you can look the other way. I'll leave that as an exercise to the reader.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  182. Cover YOUR butt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get it in writing, signed, have it filed with the corporate lawyer.

    The person directing you to do this is the one who should be on the hook for it and make sure that your can prove that you objected with documentation.

    If he won't put it in writing the make sure that your objection is in writing and filed with the appropriate corporate officers, including the controller.

  183. What to do? by Professor+Fate · · Score: 1

    Do as your boss says and either accept it or look for another job. This will happen again. Can you handle working under these conditions? If not, find another job and quit. I guess you could just quit and feel morally superior while you're living in your car but that wouldn't be my choice.

    --
    Push the button, Max!
  184. ns by Divx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just keep it simple and professional. Get a list of all the Serial Numbers you have (legal access to). Email that list to your boss, along with a letter saying: "We have office installed on the following computers: Dave Jones, Workstation 101, Serial # 1234 1234 1234 1234 Steve Jones, Workstation 102, Serial # 1244 1244 1244 1244 Etc Etc Etc I am ready to install office on workstation 201, 202, etc etc, but we have no more serial numbers that I am aware of to activate any other copies. If you have more serial numbers available, please provide me with a list of them and I can proceed with installation, thanks in advance! Tom Jones" This tells bossman that you know what is going on, that you have an inventory of what is where and what should not be where. And if by some miracle he comes up with a list of new serial numbers, that is on his head, not yours. You're just implementing instructions and information that was provided to you by your boss. If he tells you to find serial numbers on your own, tell him you have no idea how or where to look for that kind of information. Keeps it simple, shows him you're willing and ready to install, you just need that one thing from him to proceed.

    1. Re:ns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I 100% agree... remember, software just virtualizes the same problems that you have with physical problems... just because you have media to install more copies doesn't mean you are licensed (duh, this was the QUESTION)...

      My personal preference is to remind users/boss'es that new versions of software require the keys to be ACTIVATED... they contact MS servers, log the uniqueID of the computer's hardware, etc...

      all said and done the goal (IMHO) is to let the users/boss'es understand their (legal) options and choose... if they INSIST that it be installed on computer X, ask which computer it's being uninstalled from... just like a printer you don't just make them out of thin air.

      -Scott

      (*my* interest is in watching what the reprap or other 3d printers will do... IP only became a problem because software (virtual products) are simple to copy... once we can copy a chair by copying the CAD drawing, even physical property will be subject to IP problems)

    2. Re:ns by bennybertow · · Score: 1

      Re: Serial Numbers

      >We have office installed on the following computers:
      >Dave Jones, Workstation 101, Serial # 1234 1234 1234 123
      >Steve Jones, Workstation 102, Serial # 1244 1244 1244 1244
      >Etc Etc Etc I am ready to install office on workstation 201, 202, etc etc,
      >but we have no more serial numbers that I am aware of to activate any other copies.
      >If you have more serial numbers available, please provide me with a list of them
      >and I can proceed with installation,
      >thanks in advance!
      >
      >Tom Jones

      Hi Tom,

      FCKGW......

  185. MOST states do allow it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as long as one party (you) know the conversation is being recorded.

    The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

  186. License? We don't need no stinking license! by El+Bigote · · Score: 1

    Install the hell out of the software. Screw Microsoft. They'd screw you if they were in a position to. Oh, yeah, you are putting them in that position...but just do what you know they'd do since you're giving them the opportunity. Yeah. That's the ticket!

    --
    UNIX is truth, the Console is life. Use Evolution to send e-mail and not virii.
  187. Re:Ignore the law. Support your employer. by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So Simonetta, what exactly do you do for a living? If you refuse to pay my company what we ask you to pay for our software, then why should anyone pay you and/or your company for the work you do? After all, saving money by not paying you for your product or service increases my personal productivity, right? "I'm ripping you off and taking food out the mouths of your children? I don't care."

    If you don't agree with the price my company wants to charge for our software, you have exactly one choice: don't buy it and don't use it. Try "I don't like your price so I'm not going to pay you for your work" on your plumber, mechanic, doctor, lawyer, etc. and see what happens.

  188. Illegal Orders by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    Imagine instead that you are a solider who has been given illegal orders. Are you going to shoot the civilians or disregard the order and make a fuss?

  189. THIS is what you should do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't install the software.

    Tell your higher ups 'why' you will not install the software.

    Make sure 'several' people know the 'who, what, why, where and when' of this issue. They will be your witnesses if need be.

    At this point you have a few choices and you may wish to seek legal advice.

    1) Stay on the job and hope the incident results in no negative impact.

    2) Stay on the job and sue.

    3) Leave the job and sue.

    4) ...

    Obviously your employer has allot of options should they be dissatisfied with you over this matter nor is it likely they would be so foolish as to tip their hand with actual reasons for this dissatisfaction. No matter how this works out, you will suffer a great deal of emotional distress at a minimum. Don't be surprised that after a period of time, your employment is terminated. This will be for 'other' reasons and the longer the length of time between their illegality and your termination the better. For them.

    I suggest you get proactive, an attorney and consider any future you may have had with this company pretty much over. Even IF the company admits, apologizes and corrects the error of their ways, they are simply covering their asses while remaining vindictive in all probability.

    When an employer demands or even suggests an employee knowingly perform an illegal act, their ass is in a sling, but you have to act or else you will likely wind up jobless with no compensation beyond unemployment perhaps. Your going to be jobless anyway, might as well get the money. In addition to that I would hope the employer learns enough of a lesson that the next employee doesn't have to suffer similar. In other words, your pretty much doing everyone a favor.

    Me, I've been in the tech services business a long time as an outside contractor so my situation is a bit different when it comes to matters of recourse. I am an independent with a reputation at stake. Now I might gain some business by going through offices with free software like Johnny Appleseed but I prefer not to base my business or reputation on that model.

    When anybody makes such a request (not uncommon) usually I look them dead in the head and ask if these are legal copies as in site license. When they say no, I say that 'I don't do that' and what happens next is up to them. On a very few occasions I bought the software or licenses and billed the costs out as labor. The client never knew they were legit until I handed over the documentation.

    When I started to encounter these problems I simply asked myself whether I wanted to be a stand up guy or some crummy hack. Most of these businesses can afford the software, they would rather not pay if they don't have to. Those who cannot afford the software might want to reconsider how they conduct business.

    This is not to say that I don't work in places with illegit software installs. I do, but I have nothing to do with it. Kind of like a doctor with a heroin addict for a patient. I treat him and will help him straighten out but I'm not the guy giving him the heroin.

    I will say this on behalf of small business guys and many startups: MS Office is to damn expensive for what most people get out of it. I've steered people to Open Office as an alternative but encounter enough sniggling compatibility issues, software and users, that the option seldom gains much traction. Smarter users increase the possibility of successful adoption in my experience, or if needs are minimal.

    Well, good luck. Most people would simply install the software and forget about it. Life goes on.

  190. Just show them BSA material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  191. Do what you need to, but CYA by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    Is what you're being told illegal? Absolutely.

    Are there personal penalties for doing it? I honestly have no idea. Maybe you should spend $100 for a half hour of a lawyer's time.

    If you're going to do it, get the request in writing, on paper, with a real signature, from the highest ranking person in the company telling you to do it. Take it home with you. Insist on explicit wording.

    This sounds like a small company (the controller in a big company wouldn't be dealing with software licenses like this.) I'm a cog at a fortune-200 company right now, but when I've worked at small companies, I could walk into the owner's office with a knock on the door frame and a "Hey, are you busy? Can I get a minute?" In that case, especially if the owner is a decent person, make sure they know about this, and that they understand the issue, and the possible consequences.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  192. Re:Ignore the law. Support your employer. by Simonetta · · Score: 0, Troll

    So Simonetta, what exactly do you do for a living? If you refuse to pay my company what we ask you to pay for our software, then why should anyone pay you and/or your company for the work you do?

      We make medical equipment. If you need our stuff, and you don't pay us, you die.

      If we don't pay you for the software, we get to use the software anyway. And if you don't get enough money from selling your software, you die.

     
    If you don't agree with the price my company wants to charge for our software, you have exactly one choice: don't buy it and don't use it.


          Actually, we have two choices: that is the point of this discussion. We can chose to pay you, or we can chose not to. Either way we still get to use the software. And if you don't get enough money from selling your software, you die.

        You knew that the software business was like this, and you chose to make a career in it anyway. Don't waste your time trying to force people to pay for software. Better for you to come up with reasons to pay you for your skills and expertise that don't rely on unenforcable laws.

  193. No, but... by mandelbr0t · · Score: 1

    ...I'll keep cracking software that my boss installs pirated for me. That's just company policy, and I don't have any say in that.

    --
    "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
  194. This would be a prohibited reason by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Your employer can't order you to break the law and then fire you if you don't. That alone could potentially net them an extortion charge. However, as with anything, still comes to what you can prove in court. The can fire you and you have to then go after them if you want compensation.

  195. Profit or non-profit? by griffjon · · Score: 1

    Remember, if you're a non-profit, TechSoup has some affordable licenses for Micro$oft products. If you're a for-profit shop, then yeah, mgmt should buck up and pay for the licenses, or accept other legal solutions (OOo, MSOffice "Viewer" products, etc.. Or, get a site license - always worth the reduction of headaches.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  196. After you refuse to do it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask for a raise. If they don't give it to you, find another job.

    Then, about 6 months after you've left, report them to the BSA.

    That should fuck them pretty well and good.

  197. Why leave voluntarily? by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 1

    Just refuse to install the pirated software. Continue on with your normal job activities. If they fire you, unemployment is a given. If they don't, you won.

  198. Don't pirate software, period. by Abattoir · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't pirate software for work and not just because I work for a megacorporation that has business deals with many vendors, but because it is morally and legally wrong.

    I don't pirate software for personal use. I don't download music or movies illegally. I make decent money so there's no reason I can't shell out the bucks for the software that I deem worthwhile.

  199. Screw ethics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Demand in writing the order to install the software.

    2. Threaten to go with the document to Microsoft

    3. Demand money for the office licenses.

    4. Install pirated version and keep the office licenses for yourself.

    5. ...

    6. Profit!

  200. Turn in your employer! Win up to $200,000! by Animats · · Score: 1

    Click here to turn in your employer. Select the button that says "I am reporting an organization using pirated software on its own computers. (You may be eligible for a reward.)". Or call, toll-free, 1-888 NO PIRACY. Operators are waiting to take your call.

    There's even a PowerPoint presentation which explains all this, titled "Don't Play Roulette With Your Business" (And it plays fine in OpenOffice Impress.)

    Also, print out this Microsoft article about "reduced functionality mode", which is where your pirated version of Microsoft Office will probably end up after a while, unable to create new documents.

  201. For gods sake, time to take yourself seriously. by steveoc · · Score: 1

    Im sorry, but I am just mortified by your double standards in what is in fact a pathetic attempt at whinging.

    You are an "IT Professional" who works in an environment where they use Excel as a database .. and yet your biggest concern is that now you are being pressured to pirate MS-Office to save money.

    Well, many could rightfully claim that you need to stand up and assert yourself over your beliefs here about the legality of piracy .. duh. But really, you completely lost the moral ground in the first place when you watched them use Excel as a Database, and stood by and did nothing about it.

    My GOD - YOU are a programmer, an IT professional, a creative person who has the ability to make computers do things that benefit mankind. You are a modern day magician, and you deserve respect !!

    Being a professional means that you DONT SIT BACK AND LET THOSE THAT RELY ON YOU DO THE WRONG THING - get some leadership into you, assert yourself, and use that respect to make changes in the process. Being a leader in your field doesnt mean giving up and looking for a new job - be willing to lock horns with people, stand your ground and prove them wrong, no matter how big and important those other people seem to be.

    If that doesnt work out AFTER you have given it everything you have got (and proven them wrong), if they still dont get it, THEN you can walk away and get a new job, knowing that you tried.

    Who cares if they pirate MS-Office ? So they dont want to give more money to a convicted monopolist ? Big friggen deal, get over it.

    Your companies biggest IT problem is that they are living in the IT stone age - Use your skills to earn the respect you deserve, and use that respect to drag them kicking and screaming into the 21st century.

    YOUR biggest problem however, seems to be that you are treating your job like some sort of popularity contest. You are appeasing people and going with the flow, in the hope that they will like you more as long as you dont rock their boat. (Incidentally - A LOT of guys still have this problem with women as well, and end up getting dumped over and over again by hot chicks that they try to please at all costs)

    Well - heres an idea for you - throw your weight around a bit more, and be willing to challenge people a bit more. Surprisingly, you might even find that you make better and more meaningful friendships with the people that you once butted heads with.

  202. The Christian Response... by Gastrobot · · Score: 1

    ...Would be to refuse. I just quit my job because my employer's practices were illegal, and even though I don't believe I would've been doing anything illegal in participating I chose not to because I didn't want to disrespect the law, because I didn't want to help him break the law, and because I didn't want to be a hypocrite for telling him not to do something while I was glad for the opportunity since it gave me a job.

    I suggest reading Romans chapter 13 in the Bible. It talks about the necessity of obeying the governing authorities.

    "Pure and undefiled religion in the sight of our God and Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world." (James 1:27) (NASB) If you're a Christian then cleave to that. Jesus' blood washes away those stains, but do what's good in the first place.

    1. Re:The Christian Response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Christian response would be to take 5 fish and 5 loaves of bread to create a super-army of
      evil-genius Linux hackers to try and take down the evil empire right before turning yourself over to the Microsoft authorities for crucification instead. This will show them your superior power and people will follow you claiming your power over all creation despite your death. Possibly for several millenniums if you grow your hair really long first.

  203. I would not by ghostbar38 · · Score: 1

    Definetely, I wouldn't do it. And what to do about it? That's why boss of bosses exists :)

    --
    ghostbar page.
  204. The simple answer is... by Centurix · · Score: 1

    You turn them in. If you know you're installing illegal software, you are assisting, you are involved. Don't become involved, get another job before it gets worse. Honestly, if they can't afford to purchase the software properly, then they might not be able to pay your wage before long.

    --
    Task Mangler
  205. Re:Ignore the law. Support your employer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So... Might makes right? If I am able to forcibly take your work without paying you, it's okay? If I steal and sell off your medical equipment, you shouldn't try to stop me. Better to spend your time coming up with reasons for me to pay for it that don't depend on laws? I don't buy it.

  206. What If ? by steveoc · · Score: 1

    The poster of this story actually works for Microsoft ?

    Maybe his boss is telling him to install Office, and the poster doesnt realise that paying for licenses in this case is non-sensical ?

    Whats he gonna do - report Microsoft to the BSA ?

  207. Your duty as an expert by Sithech · · Score: 1
    Is have the interests of your company and your boss in mind. So you need to tell them, in language they will understand, both the problem and the possible solutions. You have to do this without making them look bad. In this case, a possible email or conversation (or both) goes something like this:

    "You probably know that we buy a set of licenses for MS Office. Each license lets us install the suite on a single machine. We are contractually obligated to not install on more machines than we bought licenses. If we don't comply with that contract, we are liable for big penalties.

    There is actually an organization out there that encourages employees to be 'whistle-blowers' against companies that violate the contract. Here's a couple news articles about the kind of trouble those companies have gotten into.

    You hired me to do a good professional job for this company. Although it's easiest for me to just install more copies of Office than we have licensed, I owe it to you and to the company to let you know that doing that will expose me, you, and the executives to possible fines and even criminal actions. Professionally, I don't think that it is worth it. Anyway, my loyalty to you and the company means that I must raise the red flag sometimes.

    I have several suggestions for how to get the company's needs met:

    1. We can buy more licenses for office. X licenses will cost $xxx and xxx hours.
    2. We can install a free version of Open Office that pretty much acts like office and would probably work for most of our users. X installations will use xxx hours.
    3. We can install an application server and move X licenses from our workstations onto that server. XX users will be able to use office using the application server. Cost will be $xxx and xxx hours.
    4. We can install X unlicensed versions of Office and accept the risk of fines of up to $xxx.
    5. ....

    Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I will hold on doing further installations until I have your written authorization for the action which the company authorizes."

  208. Re:Ignore the law. Support your employer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So unless a product is not required for survival (i.e. 99% of products), it's okay to steal it? You're a fucking moron!

    What's sad is that, calling you a fucking moron is infinitely more intellectual than the shit you post. Really man. Grow up.

  209. Copyright Infringement Is A Tort, Not A Crime by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > Other than drafting a letter to the owners of the company on how I disagree with the
    > policy, what else can I do?"

    Copyright infringement is a tort, not a crime (in this instance). Send a letter to the owners and proceed as ordered. And start looking for another job.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  210. It's an opportunity. by readin · · Score: 1

    No need to quit. Send an email to your boss explaining why you cannot legally install the software, then simply refuse to install it. If he fires or demotes you, and you're in the good ol' U S of A, it's lawsuit time. You can sue for wrongful termination. I'm pretty sure you can even sue for wrongful stalling of career. If it comes to that, be sure to contact Microsoft to see if they'll help you with your lawsuit. It would certainly be in their interest to support you.

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  211. The real world is harsh by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    Installing unlicensed software is a dangerous thing to do, but we all need our job, lets be honest. I would answer the issue by sending an email, something to the effect of:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    to: bos
    from: me
    Date: mm/dd/yy

    As per our conversation, I strongly recommend against installing unlicensed software on our employees machines. Ernie Ball Music had to settle for $90,000 with the BSA for merely accidental infringement. Please understand, I am not trying to cause any internal issues and believe I am trying to do the right thing for the company and my department by trying to limit it exposure. I fully understand that it is not my call and will defer to your judgment on the matter.

    Your name.

    You need to keep your job. You need to keep your reputation. Do what your told, but cover your ass. Great operatives are important in the world. An IT guy, like it or not, is an operative of the company. There are policies out of your control. You may disagree with them, but the job requires you do them or quit or be fired.

    You will not find an IT (or any really) job that doesn't have moral conflicts, you have to draw a reasonable line you will not cross, and be a stand-up guy and warn the people who are asking you to do something that you feel is unethical, but in the end, let the "gray area" be the decision of your boss.

    1. Re:The real world is harsh by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      This looks like a letter that will garner distrust, and get you fired pretty quickly. The OP should just resign instead of installing unlicensed MS software, if he is ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that the company didn't purchase an "install as much as you want" license. This crap just sustains the MS monopoly. Actually, it would be useful if the BSA did some high-profile raids-- the type that get sensational tv coverage, and even better, raid some individual's homes. Best thing for the free software movement.

    2. Re:The real world is harsh by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >The OP should just resign instead of installing unlicensed MS software, if he is ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that the company didn't purchase an
      >"install as much as you want" license.

      This is commonplace, and the OP needs to make sure before he does something stupid (like posting on Slashdot). It's not even all that expensive. I've made many a legal copy of Microsoft software, that would certainly look like "piracy" to someone who didn't realize we had a site license that allowed us to do exactly that.

      I'd go as far as to say it's somewhat *uncommon* for a company of a certain size to have site licenses for OS's and office applications, not to mention MSDN licenses. And maybe not every entry-level IT clerk is told the details of the licensing.

      Might be pretty stupid and embarrassing to confront these people about their "piracy" only to be told about the site license.

      Then again, maybe the OP really has been asked to commit copyright infringement by his employer. It behooves him to know for sure, and then consult a lawyer. Maybe he should make an appointment with the General Counsel of the company.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  212. Blow that whistle by dunng808 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For anyone working for the Federal Government and find themselves in a similar situation, report it to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, Disclosure Unit. This office "...serves as a safe conduit for the receipt and evaluation of whistleblower disclosures from federal employees, former employees and applicants for federal employment."

    Ignore all the advice to quit. That may be a viable option for run-of-the-mill civilian jobs, but in federal service there is only one employer. Move to another position, yes, but don't give up a federal career over something so insignificant as this. And no, you are not expected to fall on your sword. You are expected to disclose fraud, waste, and abuse.

    --

    Gary Dunn
    Open Slate Project

    1. Re:Blow that whistle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      ...serves as a safe conduit for the receipt and evaluation of whistleblower disclosures from federal employees, former employees and applicants for federal employment.

      Oh, horseshit -- under this administration, the other word for "whistleblower" is "fuckee". They just finished weakening legal protection for said fuckees.

    2. Re:Blow that whistle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strongly suggest you wait until Bush leaves office before you start blowing whistles

    3. Re:Blow that whistle by couchslug · · Score: 1

      I would also accumulate as much evidence as I could, and look for other irregularities. Revenge is sweet if revenge is legal.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Blow that whistle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of these hypotheticals are way too grandiose. This is the federal government we're talking about here. You just about have to assault your boss to get fired. Insubordination? Your boss would have to document the circumstances, wouldn't (s)he? Not to mention the mere initiation of a termination process might besmirch your boss's image in the eyes of his or her superiors ("you know, ol' Jones is losing his grip on his people..." sort of thing).

      OTOH, you might spend the rest of your career scrubbing toilets or taking inventory of the 2 million govt issue black pens every federal office seems to have. But bosses change eventually.

      Most of the other posts have covered the escalation process pretty well, although now that we have Homeland Security, it may be possible to accuse your boss of sedition, using the logic that (s)he's requiring personal allegiance over the rule of law.

  213. This happends by nytrokiss · · Score: 1

    Look at a company like LinkShare one of the biggest affiliate marketers I read this a while ago it's still in the WIKI history but has been deleted http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linkshar e&diff=prev&oldid=102114872 - ""In 2006, LinkShare paid $89,000 to Business Software Alliance (BSA) to settle claims that it was using unlicensed copies of Adobe, Microsoft, and Symantec programs. [http://www.pcworld.com/article/126551-1/article.h tml Using Illegal Software May Not Pay - Business Software Alliance collects millions from companies caught using software illegally] By Linda Rosencrance at Computerworld, July 25th 2006"" This does not condon it however if we steal software why not go opensource!

  214. Would you rape a dog? by tapehands · · Score: 1

    I think it's best to be abrasively blunt in a situation like this.

    If you did not misstate your question, and are, indeed, considering illegally installing software in a business environment, then you should be fired even before anyone has the chance to find out if illegal software was installed or not.

    If you really meant to ask something more along the lines of, "My employer is asking me to illegally install software. What is the best way to deal with this, while still keeping myself on solid legal ground?", then it sounds like you already have some pretty sound advice from the other replies to the thread...

    You just can't mess with legality in a business environment. There is too much of a chance to get caught, and then get all the blame laid squarely at your feet. It might be hard to picture yourself without a job, or going so far as to report your employer to the proper authorities, but it's better than being nailed for someone else's mistake. Just make sure you document it all to cover yourself.

  215. lawyers have least respect for the law, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny, lawyers may well have the least respect for the law,
    but they are really great to have as clients if you are a contractor.

    They (well, _my_ lawyer clients, anyway) are perfectly happy to be billed in 10 minute increments for random phone enquiries, and they don't bat an eye when you raise your rates.

    On the other hand, the entertainment industry seems to think that because they are "in the movie business" I should give a discount, provide unlimited free phone consultations, and drop any other client's mission critical emergency for their trivial whim.

    Bah.

  216. Re:Ignore the law. Support your employer. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    Hmmm..

    You live in Providence (most likely RI). I used to live there LONG AGO...

    You work for a medial equipment manufacturer.

    You have low ethics, as probably would your employer.

    I surmise you work for Afferent Corporation on 275 Westminster St. The phone number is (401) 453-9933.

    It is based in Providence, and due to the lack of polish on the website, it is a "low brow" company. I compare that to, say Boston Scientific.

    Oh well... Guess I'll leave it to be if somebody wants to alert the BSA about this and get slashdot's logs. The BSA does seem rather crazy in how they fight for people to make confessions like this.

    --
  217. Act on principle... by sethawoolley · · Score: 1

    ...so you can be replaced with a robot.

    Meanwhile, the rest of the world thoughtfully considers their actions in context with their respective situations.

  218. Just do it by Emperor+Cezar · · Score: 1

    Just do it. Then turn the idiots in. I hear the BSA is giving out pretty big chunks of money to whistle blowers.

  219. don't assume malice... by kreuzotter · · Score: 1

    Don't assume malice when incompetence is a possible explanation.
    Your boss probably thinks that it is a petty crime and no one will notice. Show him news clips that show that 1) windows now calls home and rats out the customer, 2) BSA has the right to come and audit (cost the city of Virginia Beach $1.6M). Then ask him not to put you into this situation. He may not be as bad after all.

  220. I betcha... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OP has downloaded music and doesn't own the CD/tape/record/whatever, and has no problem with it..

    But he picks to be moral when it comes to software?

    heh.

  221. Your company is NOT committing a crime by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

    If you noticed that your company was infringing on others patents (they are, of course), would you "turn them in"? Complying with a silly license is about as illegal as not paying you bills. You just might have to pay fines, fees, judgements, or whatever. However, you should probably consider leaving, because a disgruntled employee will surely bring the place down, and you don't want to get caught up in it.

    1. Re:Your company is NOT committing a crime by Backup+To+The+Web · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what country you are in, but it certainly must NOT be the US, as willful copyright violation here IS a criminal act that can be punishable with jail time (and fines).

      --
      Kevin S. Peterson Backup To The Web http://www.backuptotheweb.com
    2. Re:Your company is NOT committing a crime by hyperstation · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what country you are in, but it certainly must NOT be the US, as willful copyright violation here IS a criminal act that can be punishable with jail time (and fines).

      because we all know, american companies never order their employees to break the law to save a buck...

  222. Do or Don't, you're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compromising your morals will start you toward a dangerous path along which you may discover that there is no meaning. Holding onto your morals requires you to vest further in the idea of meaning, which may or may not pan out in the long run.

    My suggestion is to base your choice on reasons that are beyond good and evil.

  223. Very dangerous path your boss chose. by liftphreaker · · Score: 1

    Your boss has chosen to walk a very dangerous path. If you guys are raided, you're the one who installed the software and you will be hauled up. You will have to testify in court. If you are prepared for this, then make sure you document every bit and scrap of evidence which can be used to save your ass. Offline, in a secure place.

    That said, I've seen many many companies (friends working there) resort to h4x0r3d software and none of them get caught. I wonder how they have the guts to pull it off.

    Playing around with pirated software at home for fun is one thing, but at a corporate level the stakes are on a totally different level altogether.

  224. make user's do it by thatchman1 · · Score: 0

    Make the user's install the software, so you aren't responsible.

    Any company in such a dire situation that they can't afford a group license for office probably can't afford an IT person. If they can, then someone ridiculous is at the helm.

  225. Maybe they're just stupid? by Ms.Otaku · · Score: 1

    Is it possible that they just don't realize that they're asking you to do something that is illegal and could have some nasty repercussions? They may see it as not a big deal and don't understand why you're putting up such a fuss. Unless they're techies, It probably never occurred to them that they could get into actual legal trouble. We all know that a single Microsoft office license gets passed around in a family like a incestuous std! Assuming they realize that this is a real 'go to court' illegal act could result in some miscommunication. I'd include in the email something about how copying office and using it without the proper license could result in an investigation, having to appear in court, and fines. Or something like that. CC'ing it to the legal department would be helpful but could come off as overly combative. Hmmm, maybe you could poke your head into legal and ask them to politely explain that this is a rotten idea?

  226. First,update your resume by gujo-odori · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The very first thing you need to do is get your resume up-to-date and begin a job search, if you haven't already. Any company that would order you to take such a step is clearly in financial trouble. Even if you are the only sysadmin, sooner or later your job will evaporate, maybe along with everyone else's, maybe before. Don't be there when that happens. Start the process of getting out now, when you can choose a new job at your leisure, not when you become unemployed or the get busted and you are embroiled in it.

    Also, you need to buy 30 or 60 minutes of a lawyer's time. Probably an IP specialist. You may be able to find one local to you through the lawyer search on http://www.handelonthelaw.com/Default.aspx. IANAL and the following is not legal advice, blahblahblah.

    I would go ahead and install the software, but then, as I stated above, start looking for a job. Your ethical obligation to not violate copyright does not trump your obligation to support any dependents you may have, or your right to feed yourself and keep a roof over your head.

    Before installing it, thoroughly document what you have been asked to do, and that it is under duress b/c you would be fired if you refused, and document that you proposed using a free alternative and were refused. Get the document notarized, and lock it away in a safety deposit box. Do anything else the lawyer tells you to do to protect yourself. If you have emails showing them telling you to do it, preserve those in both electronic and hard copies. Keep them in the safety deposit box, too

    Then install the software.

    Once you start your new job (really; don't do this before you've left this company and are actually working at a new job), at your discretion you could make an anonymous tip to the BSA that the company willfully installed more copies of software than they had a license for. Even if the company fingers you for it, you'll have documentation showing they told you to do it, and the BSA is not likely to be interested in you per se; they are after the money, and the company has that and is the real violator. Plus, if push comes to shove at that point, you probably have nothing to lose by telling the BSA (under advice from your lawyer, of course; if the shit hits the fan, you'll need to get one) that it was you who turned them in because you couldn't leave that on your conscience, that they made you do it but you quit because of it, then turned them in.

    Good luck to you. It sucks to be working for a company like that. I hope you can find a new job that is open source friendly.

  227. Looks Like You Dont Work in Corp America by SRA8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been in a similar situation. I didnt make the email that formal, but basically wrote "Per out conversation, I will make X copies of WorldScope, based on your understanding that so many floating licenses are available." My boss wrote back "do not install." Then came by my desk and verbally said to install. THEN what do you do?

    1. Re:Looks Like You Dont Work in Corp America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to HR. Go to the corporate attorney. Go to the auditors of the company. Go.

    2. Re:Looks Like You Dont Work in Corp America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reply to his 'do not install' email, saying 'This is to confirm our discussion on [date], in which you verbally told me to install [software]. Since your instruction then contradict the email you sent, I'd like to confirm: Am I to install, or not?'

      And follow what he says in the email.

    3. Re:Looks Like You Dont Work in Corp America by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      "Raise a ticket, then I can install it."

    4. Re:Looks Like You Dont Work in Corp America by simm1701 · · Score: 1

      "Put it in writing or buy the licenses, I won't risk my ass over this - or I can install this free program thats just as good and we don't have to pay for it, legally"

      The boss already knows its against the law and has proved that by his response - given the email trail you are certainly on your own if you go and install.

      If you get sacked then you sue for wrongful dismisal and you collect the whistle blower fee from the relavant software policing agency (BSA, FACT whichever)

      Either way you send your CV out to the recruitment agencies (shouldn't need to update it, I find it more sensible to keep my CV always up to date, its not exactly difficult to do)

      If you leave on bad terms then you still can go collect the whistle blower reward - even better you have not done anything wrong.

      As I told my manager once - completely truthfully "I have as much loyalty to the company as the company has to me", I even said it with a smile on my face. The manager for some reasoned beleived the BS side of this statement, in actual fact I meant it as the truth, ie when it comes to the crunch, its zero.

      --
      $_="Slashdotter";$syn="OTT";s;..;;;sub _{print shift||$_};s!ash!Perl !;s=$syn=ack=i;tr+LLEd+BLAH+;_"Just Another ";_
    5. Re:Looks Like You Dont Work in Corp America by UncleFluffy · · Score: 1

      "Put it in writing or buy the licenses, I won't risk my ass over this - or I can install this free program thats just as good and we don't have to pay for it, legally"

      You have it spot-on. For the sake of those in the /. readership who haven't been around long enough to have learnt both the art of CYA and the necessity of it, the magic words are: "can I have that in writing, please?"

      Anyone who says "no" to a request for a written version of their instructions ... leave immediately. It makes your life so much more manageable, and remember, life's too short to spend it managing other people's fuckups.

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

    6. Re:Looks Like You Dont Work in Corp America by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      I'd send him another email acknowledging the conversation, saying that as per his verbal instruction I was now assuming that the licences were available and was now going ahead and installing the software.

      If the boss summoned me for another meeting I would have a concealed dictaphone ready.

    7. Re:Looks Like You Dont Work in Corp America by bareman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      verbally tell him you've done it???

  228. Don't be a babby. Just install it. by glrotate · · Score: 1

    You're getting righteous about sticking a a CD in a drive and clicking setup? Get over yourself. Nobody is going to get hurt, nobody is going to die. In 10 years no one will remember and it will make no difference whatsover.

    There are more important things to worry about in this world than whether every copy of MS Office is properly licensed.

    A little perspective. Have you ever broke the speed limit to get to work on time? That actually puts people's lives in danger. Who gives a rat's ass about Office installs?

  229. hmm... the victimless crime... by catmistake · · Score: 1

    I know the penalties are real.
    But I've always felt it was wrong to attribute to companies, espescially large ones, the equal rights of the individual. Some day I will fight that, and promote the ideal that the individual's rights supercede the majority's authority. Call it crime, and immoral, and let the punishment fit the crime. When the the victim has no damages, the punishment should be slight. But it rarely is. When they catch you, they punish you for everyone else that did it and got away with it. Life is so unfair. But Justice shouldn't be.

  230. Say after me "I own you now, Monkey Boy." by AllParadox · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of wusses.

    Step 1. Hire an attorney. Sorry for the bad news, but disasters happen to people. This one happens to be yours. Find yourself a reasonable, but aggressive attorney. The kind that makes the opponent break out in a cold sweat, just reading the introductory letter. The kind of a guy that other attorneys have represent them. Don't save yourself money here. This is the wrong time and place. If you haven't interviewed ten attorneys, you aren't ready to hire any of them.

    Step 2. (actually step 1, but it fits better here) Develop a plan of attack. Not defense: attack. Make no mistake about it. You have already been attacked. Your job, your livelihood, has been threatened. A stranger to you, the Controller, has ordered you to violate the law.

    Step 3. Recognize the nature of the people you are dealing with, and plan accordingly. This is not the first time that these bozos have done this, and you are not the first person that they have tried to intimidate. There is zero job security with these folks: none. They might very well fire you as soon as you have installed all the software. Certainly, they plan on lying about something in the future. If they would lie about that, they would lie about something else, as well. They would happily lie to the FBI about your independent and unsanctioned actions, in spite of actually ordering you to do it in the first place.

    Step 4. Plumb your own courage and self-regrets. A professor of mine told the story of when he, the professor, was a younger man, an accountant, in a three-man conference. The two senior participants were the company president and the company controller. The president told the controller to fudge the books. They had had a bad year, and the president wanted to conceal the losses in accounting floobie dust. The controller refused. He said "If I'll lie for you, I'll lie to you. Losing my reputation isn't worth it. I won't do it." Much to my professor's surprise, the president backed down, and found another way. That professor, by the way, is still younger than I.

    Could you live with that story in your past? I have, and I can. Would you regret backing down and breaking the law? In other circumstances, I have, and I still carry the regrets. It wasn't worth it.

    5. *They have done this before*. A leopard cannot change his spots, and this bunch of lying scoundrels has pulled this stunt before. Probably earlier today. Do some quiet investigation. You won't have to dig very deep. Most of the software in the place has been pirated, unless I miss my guess. This place is just a sitting target for an FBI raid. There is a nice reward in it for you, if you are the snitch. Plus, the FBI won't give out your name, unlike some civilian organizations. Talk with your attorney and develop some good evidence.

    6. Do what your attorney tells you to do. When push comes to shove, he and his malpractice insurance will be there with you, not me.

    7. Practice saying after me "I own you now, Monkey Boy." These idiots are now targets. They have exposed themselves to you. They are vulnerable. You have a narrow window of opportunity to exploit. Get some solid evidence in a place they cannot reach, and you can be very persuasive. You will be surprised at how generous these thieving liars can be, when facing possible exposure and criminal sanctions. Just do not commit blackmail (this is one of those places where your own lawyer comes in). Propose a generous severance package for yourself, and back it up with a written contract drafted by your lawyer. You will be very pleasantly surprised. They will give you most, or all, of it.

    --
    All is paradox. Retired lawyer, so this is just one more layman's opinion.
  231. That is pure BS!! by Cocoshimmy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I call bullshit!! Care to cite a source?

    If what you're saying is true then a career as a Hitman or mercenary would be a perfectly legitimate career. One could order and carry out assassinations with impunity.

    An contract to commit an illegal act is not valid a contract. That is why contracts to kill cannot be enforced and legitimate hit agencies do not exist. The argument that you were simply holding up your end of the deal (even if it is through a limit liability corporation) is not a defense in court. Similarly, if you are ordered to do something illegal you cannot argue that you were obliged to do it unless the company threatened you or your family with physical harm.

    1. Re:That is pure BS!! by pakar · · Score: 1

      http://www.hrzone.co.uk/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=141396 &d=101&dateformat=%25o-%25B

      Strange law, but who's gonna do the prison-time since the corporation is only a 'person' on the paper?? :)

    2. Re:That is pure BS!! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Hardly impunity, since the company itself would soon be shut down for carrying out illegal acts..??? And if you are the head of the company giving out the orders, presumably you'd be the one going to prison.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:That is pure BS!! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      if what you're saying is true then a career as a Hitman or mercenary would be a perfectly legitimate career. One could order and carry out assassinations with impunity.
      You must be one of those soccer-moms that thinks the world is a civilized places, because people are inherently good and kind. The trouble is most people are good and kind, and they often need help protecting themselves from a few people who are mean and bad and the line between renta-cop and merc can get pretty blurry. What's legal and what's illegal can depend on which side prevales and how well contracts are respected

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:That is pure BS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offence .. but I gaurantee your taxes are paying for hitmen ...
      Maybe not at the movie level ... but they are there and I would think
      they do call it a legit career.

    5. Re:That is pure BS!! by Cocoshimmy · · Score: 1

      You obviously grossly misinterpreted what I was trying to say. I never suggested that people are either good or bad nor that we live in a civilized world. In fact, that is a completely different topic and completely irrelevant to the discussion.

      What I am saying is that just because it's in writing doesn't automatically make it legal. Obviously murder is illegal and just because you have a contractual obligation do commit it or your employer orders you to do it, it does not protect you nor the corporation from the legal consequences.

    6. Re:That is pure BS!! by Cocoshimmy · · Score: 1

      You didn't read my comment completely as we both agree that such a company would be shut down and the one issuing the orders and possibly others could be indicted. I said IF it was the case that an illegally constructed contract (such as a contract to kill) was a legitimate contract that the company had this so called "corporate immunity" that would hold up in a court of law THEN they could act with impunity. Obviously this isn't the case and I used Hitmen as an example.

  232. Ethics, you know it's wrong or you wouldn't ask by tfiedler · · Score: 1

    Ethics dictates that never, under any circumstances, will you comply with a request to break the law for financial reasons. Morals say it too but that's not a real important topic with most slashdot followers so we'll leave it alone.

    If you comply, you are just as GUILTY as those who are making the request.

    I would fire anyone who works for me who did it, and all of my staff has been told that pirated software on the network or any desktop is grounds for immediate termination.

    --
    Democrats and Republicans are like AIDS and Cancer, I want neither!
    1. Re:Ethics, you know it's wrong or you wouldn't ask by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      I too own a business, and I too have the same ethic. Damn it, we're programmers and create software on a daily basis. I've had clients negotiate with me by saying that they "know they can easily copy the program and resell it". How long do you think it took me to walk out of their offices -- diskettes still in hand (long time ago).

      The paper trail and alibies are all fine and dandy to stay loyal to your employer and to attempt to save yourself. As the creator of software, I'd be terribly angry with you for stealing my hard work. I don't care who's accountable for the theft, you're the one responsible for it -- having been the one to do it and all.

      I've had three clients tell me that they didn't want to pay for their MySQL licence -- that I should just install it and not tell anyone. So I installed it, and paid for it myself. I'd rather my client steal from me, than my client or myself steal from MySQL.

      The only employees that feel comfortable stealing software are those who have no intellectual property of their own. Well stick your hand in some paint, and create a kindergarten finger-painting. After you've spent the ten minutes washing your hands, think about someone using it on a billboard without even telling you.

  233. Re:Ignore the law. Support your employer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My God, you're an ass. You're basically saying you can steal part of someone's livelihood just because you can and can get away with it while at the same time laughing that if the person you're stealing from then can't afford your products then you'll have no problem with them dieing. I'd like to see someone put a gun to your head and rob you blind or break into your house and take what they want while fucking up the place "just because they can.". Really, there's no difference in attitude between yourself and someone doing that so it'd serve you right. Actually, what I really hope is that someone rats out your fucking employer and the lot of you involved get fined and/or go to jail.

    The sad part is you'd probably be pissed off if due to a crime (say, arson of a factory or warehouse or something) your boss came to tell you that you and your coworkers had to take a pay cut to make up for it. Or maybe have to lay you off. You might be pissed at whomever was responsible and yet, you're doing the EXACT same thing.

  234. Hire these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hire these guys -their work is ---well, magical.
    Just to be safe, do it from a junk machine - anonymously, then take an axe to it.

    I'm serious.

    http://www.wolfware.dk/intro/welcome.asp

    Then take the RED PILL.

  235. So, instead of stealing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why not lie?

    The OP is obviously somewhat ethical, unlike your lying ass.

  236. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a douche. A huge one. Open Office is complete shit. I would never install that piece of garbage for other people to use. You fail at IT.

    PS. Grow a pair.

  237. Do the right thing by feld · · Score: 1

    and tell them no. If they want to make a fuss, quit. If they have pirated software already in place, report them to the BSA.

    That's what I did in November. Quit and reported. I refused to install pirated copies of Office, Photoshop, and XP. I had only recently discovered that XP and Office were indeed pirated. Found out the RHEL server was pirated. Discovered a couple of the Server 2003s were pirated...

    I took the door. I'm not risking my ass over a job. It's just a JOB!!

    PS: I'll never let that happen again... never will I work at a business like that again. Never...

  238. Two words: Paper Trail by retro77 · · Score: 1

    create a paper trail that has them acknowledging the facts. That way you _ss is covered in case. I would look for work elsewhere and report them.

    1. Re:Two words: Paper Trail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't quit. They have no cause to fire you.
      Email your boss and cc a co-worker you can trust as a witness, also cc your private/home email account.
      The email should be unambiguous, blunt and to the point.
      The email should reitterate any previous conversations had regarding the matter in detail.
      Then say why you cannot do as requested. risks, legal, ethical etc.
      And state the alternatives OSS, buy licences etc.

      Be prepared to record any future meetings and conversations with your boss. You should be able to do this legally whether you do it openly (like holding a tape recorder in front of your boss) or covertly. Recording other people's conversations covertly is illegal however.
      Print and forward (to your home email) any future correspondence regarding the matter or any action you feel is a consequence of your stance on the matter.

      Then if you get any flack over it you should be able to sue for unfair dismissal etc etc.

  239. A reply to everyone by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Again I seem to be the only one in Slashdot-land that has a certain opinion. And I thought my opinion was the most rational and reasonable position to take.

    Let's see here: It seems that people are creating a fantasy and then calling upon a mythical higher power to defend this fantasy.
    The fantasy being that one can restrict through moral suasion the copying of software when there are hundreds of millions of machines in every home and office in the civilized world that freely and infinitely copy this software. And that this software has some natural intrinsic value simply because the writer spent many hours creating it, even though once created it can be inifinitely copied.

        The higher mythical power here is the concept of law: fair and universal justice willing to go to any length to defend to software creator's believed natural right to restrict access to 'his' software, and, by extension, the unlimited use of the world's collective governmental authority and resources to back up this developer's desire to restrict assess to a item that can be freely and infinitely copied.

        And, having declared this fantasy to be a natural reality that is endorsed by all civilized beings and governmental entities, my opponents in this debate assume the natural right to defend this fantasy with unlimited use of violence against the personage and property of anyone who would undertake to dispute this fantasy given the logic and limitations that presently exist in the real world where all must live.

        Jeez, correct me if I'm wrong, but you'all just must be Americans!

    1. Re:A reply to everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And YOU must just be a fucking commie. "Software is common good." Really? Fucking commie.

      Die, commie, die. Your time is past.

  240. something... by hyperstation · · Score: 0

    very recently, i decided it was time to reinstall windows xp on my work issued laptop. normally, users would return the laptop to IT to have this done, but since i work in IT (not as an admin) and we have small department with lots of users to take care of, i do those things myself. i extracted the product key from the existing installation and did the whole song and dance. when it came tine to activate my new installation, the key (supposedly legit) was first rejected by the internet system, and then after a while on the phone with microsoft, rejected by the activation support people. apparently, the person who installed windows on my computer initially used an illegal key, which is strange becuase we have a volume license for XP. maybe we hit our limit and he just used whatever he could find.

    in the end, realizing that i wasn't tied to windows, i dumped it and installed ubuntu linux. things are just find with my laptop now.

    moral of this story? in the end, i called and told MS that my work issued copy of windows was not legal, or "genuine", or whatever. one of your users could end up doing the same with their pirated copy of office one day, call in for support, or somehow rat you out without even realizing it. i seriously doubt you've been told to tell all the users not to tell anyone that they are using pirated copies of office, and one of those users is likely to inadvertently give away the secret. the more users, the better the chance of that.

    maybe the boss should know that fact, and maybe you should point him or her to some of the horror stories told by other companies and organizations who have been caught using large numbers of illegal copies of various software packages. it's just not worth it.

    if they still won't listen, install their software, polish up your resume, and start looking for another job as suggested by others in this thread. you'll likely need it soon.

  241. Well, this is not stealing or killing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so i guess it's ok to do so. In Russia installing multiple copies of MS product can land person in prison. ALWAYS get written and signed or otherwise documentable order to do so when in doubt.
    If i were you i'd install OOo somewhere to show your pointy-haired boss it's usability.

  242. Here's an idea... by ashghan · · Score: 0

    Quit whining. It happens. Deal with it.

  243. Additional Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has stated that anyone convicted of copyright violations on their or anyone elses software will lose any certifications they hold with microsoft and be forever banned from obtaining any Microsoft certifications.

    Don't do it.. it's not worth it!

  244. It's all about the paperwork by deimios666 · · Score: 1

    I worked at multiple companies before and all of them followed the same practice of using pirated software.

    What I did was write a declaration that the software is being used illegally and had it signed by the people in charge thereby letting them take responsibility. If any BSA people appeared I had an alibi.

    I have tried converting them to openoffice but the result was far from acceptable. Slow startup speeds on mediocre hardware wasted a lot of time and problems with import/export had you guessing if the document you sent will actually look the same at the destination. Also there are no real free alternatives to antivirus software. (ClamWin is a bad joke). When the software costs more than the hardware you run it on, is a sure sign that you need to switch to Linux.

    One of the companies was in the education business. We had computer usage courses which required us to teach MS software. We did our best and taught the alternatives too but as long as the exam requires usage of Internet Exploder and Outlook Express along with MS office we had no real choice.

    --
    I think, therefore you are.
    1. Re:It's all about the paperwork by alienw · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with AVG? I actually prefer it over McAfee or Norton. Faster, less memory usage, very reliable.

  245. Dinosaurs? by Cocoshimmy · · Score: 1

    Nazis rode dinosaurs?

    1. Re:Dinosaurs? by Arterion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nazis rode dinosaurs? No, but that's what will happen if we allow gay marriage.
      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
  246. Re:Ignore the law. Support your employer. by EdelFactor19 · · Score: 1

    Wow, talk about a liar.. someone please mod her down

    "I'm not a criminal or an anarcharist. I am one of the twenty five million Americans who have been arrested for possession of herbal intoxicant cannibus and can point out many instances of having suffered discrimination as a result."
    AKA I'm a socialistic hippie who thinks that the law only applies when it benefits me. Oh I shot someone, well I dont like him and I dont like that law so I'm not a murderer. yeah right

    "Copying it, using it, modifing it is not a crime." Actually it is. Just because you are a potsmoking hippie who thinks the laws are bad doesn't mean they aren't laws.

    next you are going to tell me shooting people isn't a crime perhaps?

    "I don't steal" See above, you admit to stealing in your post outright. I bet you'd call it stealing if someone stole your bag of pot.

    "I am now unfairly discriminated against" how are you unfairly discriminated against? You broke a law, you got caught, you were convicted of a felony and now you have to acknowledge that fact when you try to find work. The only unfair thing about it is that you don't like it.

    "This experience has led me to real-word realization that most of what passes for law is just bullshit designed to keep someone rich. And that especially applies to any law related to software."
    umm maybe i'm confused but how does being arrestd for possession of marijuana have anything to do with laws about keeping someone rich or software. If anything it prevents people from getting rich from selling the stuff.

    "I do copy software. I do it at work if it can improve my personal productivity. I am used to my text editor and my user interface configuration. Ditto my graphics image processing software. I'm not going to learn yours. If my company won't buy it and install it for my use, then I do it myself. I'm too old and worldwise to give a shit about whether someone has a problem with this. I don't care."
    Actually it sounds like you aren't worldwise at all. You are just too old and too stubbornly arrogant and self important to realize that you are a moron. Your text editor, hmm lemme guess Microsoft Word, if you want it and they wont pay then buy your own copy or deal with it like everyone else at work who wants their editor. Oh you don't like your "user interface configuration" whatever the hell that means, so buy one.

    while we are at it, can i have your name so i can make sure I never hire you? thanks that'd be great

    --
    "Jazz isn't dead, it just smells funny" ~Frank Zappa
    EdelFactor
  247. go up the chain by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    Bring it up to your boss's boss. Maybe it's insubordination, but it's better than the alternatives.

  248. AVG is great, not free by holophrastic · · Score: 2, Informative

    AVG isn't free. AVG Free Edition is. I use it at home, and love it dearly. It's not free for business. I've installed AVG at four separate businesses, having proudly purchased each one. No one deserves it more. What a perfect product. It's general silence and (optional) non-disruptive activity/update/operation is what makes me smile most.

  249. Simply install OpenOffice and wait your boss act by epertinez · · Score: 1

    I think it is VERY easy. They are trying to make you do an ilegal act with no excuse. Simply, don't do it. Act legally. Install OpenOffice wherever you've been told to install ilegal copies of MS Office. Easy. What is your boss going to do? Tell HIS boss you have not followed his orders to install ilegal software? I don't think so, but if he does, defend yourself. It's easy: a) The ilegal action you've been asked for is, in no means, a way to save money. OpenOffice will do the trick and is legal. b) If you are presented with a case or two were MS Office become necessary, show them a case or two of already installed MS Office that could be moved to OpenOffice so the licenses get used in those special cases. c) Explain your bosses boss you are the responsible of comiting an ilegal act even if following orders. d) Explain your bosses boss that anytime Microsft can do what have been done with Windows XP. If your MSOffice is not legally registered you'll be unable to download the lastest patch for the lastest virus. So savings today can easily become unexpected expenses tomorrow.

  250. Install OpenOffice by Dwedit · · Score: 1

    Install OpenOffice and change the splash screen and icons. Nobody will tell the difference.

  251. warez? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and this is WHY I hate working in the windows world.
    every where I have worked in the past, people wanted me to do this for them.
    I suggest alternatives and most of the time I get my way to save there ass and mine.
    if not I advise them that what there doing is against the law and if they want the product I WONT install it they would have to do it....not me.
    I'm so sick of this.
    Ive lost jobs because I didn't follow orders.
    sorry I'm not going to jail for you.....your a job NOT my FAMILY!!!
    server wise use open source if your so FRIGGEN CHEAP, front of the house wise, just buy the damm thing.
    cheap bastards.
    this gos for new pc too, when they share the Windows Disk with everyone!!!
    just buy it.
    better yet just buy a macmini or use your OLD crap with Linux.
    ""all of you"" have excuse's for everything.
    when your done you could go play your video games.

    there I said it.
    it needed to be said.

  252. Re:Don't make this about open source! by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes this is a legal issue, and "Open Source" (or "Free Software") is the term describing the type of license the software uses. In other words, "open source" is just as much a legal term as it is a technical one.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  253. Have you shown your boss OpenOffice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "Hello Boss, I would prefer not to install Windows as you requested, but I am happy to install this free Open Source system called OpenWindow".
    "Uh, install Windows anyway"

    versus

    "Hi Boss, can we schedule a half-hour meeting in the next coming week where I can show you OpenWindow?"
    "Okay"

  254. Start looking for a new job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... And when you've got something lined up, turn them in to the BSA and quit.

  255. A technical solution by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Simply hack/dig into Open Office and put Microsoft logos on it. Maybe they'll never know the difference. If they do, blame it on MS bugs just like we do with real MS bugs. Done!

  256. Don't Stand for it by Peus · · Score: 1

    It is sometimes difficult to do the right thing, you may just do what you are told, not rock the boat, not be labelled as a trouble maker, something that could follow your carier for a long time. However if you are brave you can do the right thing, take them to court, by asking you to do something you know is illegal, something you feel is wrong and threatening your continued employment if you don't is surely a breach of the contract of employment they have with you, and undoubtedly illegal. Take them for everything they've got!!! Would I be brave enough to do this if I were in that position? Probably not!

  257. If you're asked to replace lights with torches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You refuse to do it, and they will find a BS reason to fire you and have another do it.
    You comply and testify and they will still fire you.
    You comply and lie, and you go to jail.

    What's there to think about? Get out before the house of cards topples.
    By the way, Microsoft generates a lot of revenue by lax enforcement until the business gets big. When that happens they ask for preferential treatment as a vendor and if turned down, they bring in the auditors.

  258. You need to cover your back - nicely by cheros · · Score: 1

    Write an email that states your concern, but camouflage it a bit so it gets responded to.

    You could say, "I have been told to install this software on xx machines, but I haven't been able to clearly establish our position on licensing. Could you please confirm you will take care of license compliance?"

    The issue is that you have been ordered to install software, not manage licenses, and maybe someone is haggling with MS to get a better price (by threatening to convert to Linux, for instance). The above guarantees that you will have asked the question, and you should save your question and the answer OFFLINE, preferably in a different mail account. As you're not responsible for licensing it's not your problem.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  259. And you're not sure, either by cheros · · Score: 1

    In a big company procurement is handled differently from installation and sometimes gaps appear. We don't know the right circumstances - the installation may not be illegal at all.

    It's all well being drastic about it, but the step I've missed here is simply MAKING the observation that they could be short of licenses. Copyright violations don't actually hit staff if they've asked the question or have made the observation, because it's reasonable to assume that your boss wouldn't want to risk prison and thus do the right thing.

    Unless, of course, you're the one in charge of license management..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:And you're not sure, either by Peus · · Score: 1

      I agree, I work for a big company, and do alot of installations but don't handle licensing, yet I know that we have a half decent confiuration managment process in place that is monitoring and making sure we have it correct. In the original story Mister anonymous states that he is being told to install multiple copies to save money, it's not a question of the company not knowing if the licensing is there, they are breaking copyright agreement to help better line their own pockets. Thats just wrong!

  260. depends on local laws; lawyers...etc by lpq · · Score: 1

    Regardless of your opinion of legality -- are you sure that the lawyers of your company would agree with your position? I.e. if the B.S.A. did an audit, could your legal come up with the relevant licenses or "legalese" to protect the company?

    Remember, the law is not about the "truth" -- it is only about what the lawyers can convince a judge or jury of, as "true", that counts. Whether it represents truth or your interpretation of "legal" is not relevant. ;^/. Having seen trial cases where lawyers, with the aid of paid-expert testimony, essentially claimed the sky was the color of green peas, and win -- I realized our legal system has very little to do with the common person's idea of "truth".

    You could cause yourself a world of hurt to no productive end. Principles are great -- but sometimes it is better to fight battles you can win rather than being the sacrificial goat to "truth", today. Unfortunately, to work in most areas of business today, almost requires some "greying" (Orwellian euphemism) of one's morals.

  261. Only one solution by Devon+Dan · · Score: 1

    Refuse. You are knowingly breaking the law. Even if a sympathetic court were to appreciate your moral dilemma of 'doing the right thing' and doing what your bosses tell you to, you are responsible for IT so the buck stops with you. If you refuse and the company fire you, there is one almighty case for wrongful dismissal. I would suggest you get all of this in writing to as many key people as possible (bosses, HR, marketing/PR... and maybe even an outside party), making sure that any correspondences are dated and signed. Also request they acknowledge the receipt of anything you send them. If you ignore the problem and FACT find out, the only result will be your neck on the chopping block. Good luck Devon Dan

  262. Just install open office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just install open office and when you receive the memo,
    answer that the MS Authentic software thingy would not let you install.
    Of course keep the memo and frame it in your cubicle.

  263. Don't Quit -don't put another person in your place by JFilz · · Score: 1

    First of all - DON'T QUIT. 1. Stick to your guns about not installing unauthorized copies. Draft a friendly letter detailing the cost and benefits of purchase or using OSS - PROS and CONS of each. Explain your moral - as they seam to lack the same..... 2. Track/record/log every email/memo/conversation (even manually write down: who what when where and who else herd it) - KEEP OFF SITE 3. LOG all illegal installs and serials used - verify if possible the real number of purchased licenses (copies of Invoices). Just remember that the number of CD/Install disk does not necessarily qualify - as many get lost or pilfered. Take down Serial numbers and which PC it is installed in (multiple PC with ONE serial number is good but not the best proof). 4. Take your NDA-Non-Disclosure Agreement (if you signed one) and talk to a lawyer in this feild (use the 1/2 hour "free" that most will give - maybe you can strike a deal that if you get fired - maybe he do pro-bono or can get a percent or if awarded reasonable "Lawyer fees" - there are organization that will supply legal support for this type of dismissal) 5. Get your CV out - get references/letter of remediations from people you work with (not the illegal promoting people). If anyone is interested - tell them you have to meet before/after work. (I have been there - Nice to have some one take you out for breakfast!) Explain it might take a month or so to "be free". 6. Be friendly and helpfully in all correspondence and conversation! DON'T do anything that gives them just cause to fire you (except not acting on doing the illegal act). 7. If they threaten to fire you over not doing this illegal act. Again please be polite and friendly - State: If so would they like to discuss severance package and/or continuation of salary and benefits for a set time frame (don't tell them: to give you time to get a new job and to be satisfied with that new position). (PS: This is also called hush money.) 8. ONCE terminated - Go straight to the Lawyer (Do not pass GO, do not collect $200) to have HIM may explain it to the firm that it might HAVE been cheaper to buy the licenses as what they have done is wrongfully dismissal and that it will be treated as such. 9. File with court and get the "appropriate" groups involved. If need be - request an audit etc.... 10. Collect a NICE severance package as issued by the court! End of THAT story. This should NOT hurt your future job positions as you did NOTHING illegal - you went though LEGAL hoops to keep your legal morals. If any thing this should help you to get a job with a larger firm as it show your a upstanding guy - and besides you could be saving them money in the long run. Good luck.

  264. However .. by cheros · · Score: 1

    .. you STILL have to ensure you commented, in a nice way, before you go and cry wolf. If you get know as the person who goes outside as soon as you find something questionable you're not going to find a job. Mistakes happen too (and are more common than malicious intent)..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:However .. by Peus · · Score: 1

      Of course but the article said that he had offered them alternatives in form of OpenOffice and that he had expressed concerns and had been overuled by his manager. Sounds like he had done all that already. I would never advocate taking legal action on a whim, you should always settle things privately were possible, and reasonable.

  265. Just so you know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That BSA was awarding something like $200,000 for reporting usage of pirated software by your employer,anonymously,I don't know if it expires already but you can try still,I know most of the /.ers here hate this but if you're in a worse situation...

  266. Calendar Quote by Unique2 · · Score: 1

    Funny, my little desk calendar had the quote "a man willing to steel for me, is a man willing to steel from me". If your Boss is fine with stealing from software companies, what makes you so sure he wouldn't have a problem stealing from you? Nevermind FAST or the legalities of it all, your train of thought should be ruling it out on grounds of job security before thinking about anyone else.

    --
    No trees were harmed in the posting of this message. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
    1. Re:Calendar Quote by Nick+Number · · Score: 1

      Funny, my little desk calendar had the quote "a man willing to steel for me, is a man willing to steel from me".
      By any chance did this calendar have pictures of Jerome Bettis and Ben Roethlisberger on it?

      --
      Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
  267. Social Engineerig by MariusT · · Score: 1

    Find a consulting company to tell your boss that it is better to use OpenSource. He will listen to them, and this way to you

  268. Stick to your principals by Cancel-Or-Allow · · Score: 1

    Not only will you gain more respect in the long run, you will have less to regret later on.
    I am the IT guy for several small businesses in my area. On a few occasions I am asked to install software beyond what is licensed. I explain to them very politely but firmly that it is illegal to do so and that if I did, would they trust a criminal with their data? Works every time. On one occasion one client hired someone else to 'save money' but ended up costing them way more than they bargained for. So who did they trust when looking for someone to trust with their technology?

    Reputation is always better than the quick buck.

  269. Would your company do this for you? by Ed+Black · · Score: 1

    quote>I have been over ruled by our controller, to my disagreement. I would never turn them in, but I am in tough place by knowing doing something illegal. You're being coerced into low-level law-breaking, which you would be held completely liable for and which could damage your future career - now think about whether your company would break the law for you.

    Think about whether they would string you up by the nether regions if you suggested the director help you out with some casual law-breaking you were involved in.

    Think about how much integrity they have, and how much you have, how much this company cares whether you go to jail, weigh it all up against money and losing your job, and you should have your choice right there.



    PS: Without actually turning anyone in, how would the director of your company feel if he got a boatload of unexpected literature about businesses pirating software? Or would they realise that was you?

    1. Re:Would your company do this for you? by achbed · · Score: 1

      >You're being coerced into low-level law-breaking,
      Low-level? $150K per violation plus jail time (not to mention attorneys fees) is not my idea of low-level. You can bring that up next time you have a meeting with this ass - and make sure that *his* boss (or the owner if possible) is in the room when you say that. They do realize that the *company* is the one who typically gets hit with huge settlement fees, right? (and if it's a public company, that typically costs the CEO their job) Oh, and if you choose to quit, you might want to thank them for the $200K reward the BSA is offering right now for reporting them.

  270. I agree with everyone here ... by krygny · · Score: 1

    .... Get a pair , blow the whistle and quit. I don't know about you, but we all here at /. are highly principled; and we're even more principled when it's somebody else's ASS!

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  271. Open Office by pci · · Score: 1

    If they don't want to spend money on Microsoft Office, offer them a free alternative that will do pretty much everything they want anyway.

  272. Document it by dosboss · · Score: 1

    One majorly important piece of advice: get it in writing.

    CYA, baby.

  273. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of our software is pirated. As the IT manager, I don't really care. The upper management knows about it, it's up to them if they want to spend the money - i've given them the quotes.

    The way I see it, the chances of FAST or the BSA turning up on our doorstep is so slim that it's just not worth spending the money.

  274. Illegal Software by Grindalf · · Score: 0

    Having worked in IT and in managment consultancies for years... Make sure you keep a copy of the instructions in writing, ask for one to cover yourself if not. Normally accounting auditors check for this when auditing accounts for your organisation - if you have a printout of the instructions this shifts the blame onto the manager who is effectively the author of the illegal act. It is important that you have your instructions in writing when dealing with a criminal boss.

    --
    The purpose of existence is to make money.
  275. Take the Machiavellian Approach and CYOA by overlook77 · · Score: 2, Informative

    No reason to jeopardize your own job over a licensing issue for Microsoft. "Teacher teacher, Billy was talking when you were out of the room!" Dont go out of your way to rat out your coworkers or your own company that pays you. I wouldnt install the software though, because you certainly dont want to be liable if they get caught. Like the other posts, I would either make someone else do it or get something in writing from a superior telling you the copies are legal to cover your own a$$. No reason to go telling though.

  276. he never mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he never mentioned that he was working for the gov't.

  277. Completely unprofessional. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You do not discuss internal bussiness matters in front of strangers. Period.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  278. Who you gonna call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An anonymous call to these guys should do the trick!

  279. Who says going straight is easy? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    One does the right thing because it is the right thing to do, not because it makes your life easier.

    I do not have such lose morals and would resign in a bit if I was ordered to do something illegal, full in the knowledge that it would be painful.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  280. Would I install un-licensed software? by iatarget · · Score: 0

    I have solved this issue every single time by asking my boss to sign a document that states something to the effect. "I SoAndSo her by order my staff to install product X even without proper licensing in place." They every single time back down. I mean every single time. Yah it can hurt your promotion prospects. But if you like me and refuse to be promoted it's not an issue.

  281. I have gone to bed hungry. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    As did my dad before me.

    He instilled into us some moral values, a sense of what is wrong and what is right and of how doing the right thing is very often not the easiest thing to do.

    It is a shame to see other people have note been so lucky.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  282. we can advise but you have to live with yourself by crimperman · · Score: 1

    Why are you asking us - other than to generate a /. discussion?

    Time to decide where you stand and stick to it. We can all advise that you should leave - and it seems most people are doing that - but in the end it is you who has to live with whichever decision you make. So ask yourself - which type of person can I live with being and _be_ that person. This includes blowing the whistle.
    If it were me I would leave now - not waiting for another job - and write to my bosses explaining clearly why I was leaving. I would not blow the whistle or snitch as I think that if they act like this it will catch up with them eventually and the less involved you are ,the better.

    You disagree with the decision to do something illegal. You are unhappy about knowingly doing something illegal. Yet you say you want to keep your job. _Why_ would you want to work in an environment that requires you to be part of something you clearly dislike?

    What are your reasons for wanting to keep the job? They'd have to be pretty good to outweigh the negatives of this side wouldn't they?

    There are other jobs, maybe less pay, less benefits but they come with things like sleeping at night and looking yourself in the mirror each morning.

  283. What an idiotic comment. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Reasonable people don't to illegal things, period.

    If you have no morals, values or respect for the law of the land, fine, but your stance describes an illegal action, no matter how you want to spin it.

    It certainly is not a hineous crime, but each person has to fight his own fights, a Systems Administrator has this kind of battles on his way.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  284. Do you jest? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I worked in several countries that are well known for corruption.

    I never ever installed pirated software for anybody.

    Working in a corruption ridden place is no excuse for you to become corrupt as well.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  285. Remove it or turn them in! by tokentry · · Score: 0

    You absolutely must turn them in. I am afraid that what you are doing is a crime. The real problem is you are the most knowledgeable person about software licensing and therefore they may turn the blame to if any problems arise. I have used some less then licensed software in testing, and demonstration. But all software was 100% (over licensed) before I moved it into production. Start the move today to Open Source solutions, explain to the management that this is a required if they refuse to pay the bill. If they don't want to pay and don't want you move to open source turn them in. You have legal protections (in US and EU Nations) as a whistleblower. This is your obligation; you are knowingly breaking the law. If you are talking about a lot of software this is a very serious crime with criminial and civil penalties. Also if you don't cover your ass your own company can sue you for installing the pirated software.

  286. Documenting is the stupidest thing you could do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In one of my classes they talked about an accountant that knowingly did what management told him to do, and who documented everything illegal he did. At every stage in this process he disagreed with management. But guess what?

    When things hit the fan and the company got investigated, HE GOT THE LONGEST JAIL SENTENCE! Put another way, he documented at every step how he knowingly committed illegal acts. Do not put yourself in this trap. Do not do illegal things. Rather, get the hell out.

    The only thing you can do is to elaborate the consequences by showing them articles of what happened to other companies.

  287. No pirated software in my workplace! by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's no pirated software where I work. I can be sure of that because we're a 100% Open Source / Manual Methods shop.

    We got a "friendly visit" from FAST once. They seemed concerned mainly with how we prevented employees from copying the software that was on their workstations (more particularly with trying to sell us a Windows-only, closed-source payware program that would have made a christian attempt to prevent this sort of thing). I pointed out that we had no procedure in place to prevent this and were unlikely ever to institute one. I thought the poor guy's arsehole was going to cave in until I pointed out that every piece of software on their machines was either truly Open Source or otherwise redistributable, so there would be no reason for us to prevent this.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  288. Copying "software" is not stealing! by Triynko · · Score: 1

    Actually, losing your job IS a sort of threat to your family.

    While installing unlicenced software and murdering someone are both illegal; they are not equivalent. Unlike murder, installing a few extra copies of software you've already purchased does not hurt anyone; especially in the case where you don't have the money to purchase it. The industry is not "losing" money that they never made in the first place -- how arrogant; the company in question never had the money to give them! If they can't copy MS Office; they're not going to have a fundraiser; they're just going to use Open Office.

    Copying "SOFTWARE" is not equivalent to stealing, because it does not take something from another individual -- they do not "go without" -- because an additional copy is made. If I build a house down the street that is identicle to yours, that is not stealing. Making a copy does not cause your house to disappear.

    If someone climbs Mount Everest and discovers a new species of bird on it; does that mean that they own it? No! My point is that just because someone does a lot of work developing software does not mean that they own it. Once some pattern of information is discovered, it becomes part of the universe. Furthermore, most software in existance is destined to arise based on the simple constrains of the development environments, and natural selection of correct choices, which is why you will see so many similar software patterns even at high levels of complexity arising in completely independent places. Copyrights are pure BS.

    Anyway... its still illegal (for now); so the guy should quit, turn them in, etc. or they should use Open Office and protest copyright law.

    1. Re:Copying "software" is not stealing! by rkoot · · Score: 1

      I agree; he should quit his job as soon as possible.
      About the "copying software is not stealing". How would you call the leakage of pre-release software? The software might have been made by a single individual who, until the software is released in public, actually owns the only existing copy in the world? And the programmer's son copies the software for fun (without his father's knowledge) and puts it on the internet?
      If "patterns of information" are written down somewhere, it's no problem to copy them? How about money? Can I copy money without having a problem??
      I'd love to use that defense in court if I were a complete moron.

      But then again, maybe I am..

  289. It'll be your crime, and your time. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    You know that what they are asking you to do is illegal. However, even if they coerce you into doing it under threat of losing your job, you will still be guilty of the crime and will suffer the punishment. You will also probably be scapegoated, and your superiors will disavow all knowledge, and probably even claim that your documented evidence of being ordered to do this was fabricated.

    Your moral duty at this point is to leave your job. If you can't afford to quit, well, that's your own damn fault.

  290. All you need to do is. by Master+Ben · · Score: 1

    Get some sort of evidence of what they are asking you to do, be it email or whatever. Then simply refuse to do it. Give them the option of either purchasing new licenses or go open source. If they fire you over it(which is unlikely), you now have evidence of wrongful dismissal.

  291. Probably already been mentioned but... by BeProf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am not a lawyer, but I am the son of an internal bank auditor who's been asked to do some illegal things during her career. Here's how dear ole' Mom handled it, and I think this is how you should handle it:

    Inform your supervisor in writing that what he's asking you to do is illegal under thus and such provision of thus and such law and as such you can't fulfill the request. Be specific and be complete. Ask them if doing this is a condition for your continued employment. Ask them for a response in writing. Send two copies of it through the regular old mail, one to him, one to yourself. Keep the one to yourself, unopened, in a safe place.

    At this point they have two choices: They can fire you, in which case you can sue the pants off them for wrongful termination or they can back down.

    PS - Under no circumstances would I just go ahead and do it because, by your own admission, you know this is illegal. That makes you an accessory to the crime, regardless of whether or not they're threatening to fire you.

    --
    You are attempting to read sigs. Cancel or Allow?
    1. Re: Probably already been mentioned but... by JoeGee · · Score: 1

      I agree with the original poster 100%.

      We've had BSA here in my small town several times. At least around here it's not uncommon for competitors to turn each other in for violations. In that kind of petty environment it's essential to keep all of your ducks in a row.

      Depending on how large your company is, the odds increase that you will be audited for compliance some time in the future. Such an audit can cost thousands of dollars per violation per workstation.

      When I carefully explain to my clients the potential costs of pirated software, even going so far as to explain the costs to them, and to me, of duplicated licenses, and why I positively refuse to knowingly install anything that is pirated, they are left with either two choices: install licensed software, install open source software, or find a new IT guy.

      I cover my own ass. If they want to install illegal stuff, they can find someone else to do it. I will not be an accessory to a crime. Even if in my heart I believe it's not a crime, the law says different, and I am subject to the law.

      Finally, if these people will knowingly insist on their employees doing illegal things, are they really the kind of employer you want? Others have said it, I concur, find a new employer ASAP.

      -Joe

      --

      Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
  292. good documentation, and prepare a firekit by capsteve · · Score: 1

    tell him the truth. tell your boss it's illegal. tell him that the cost of X bootleg copies of office = XX,XXX,XXX,XXX dollars in fines. show him examples of companies who have been caught in the past(new york post). give him an option of how to get into commpliance, i.e. five seats a year until compliance is met, plus updates to keep existing licenses current. give him this information via email, and bcc: your personal email. make sure you have good documentation(email) that shows that you recommended the purchase of X copies of office for an equivelant number of workstations(or some plan to bring the company into grace). do what you need to do to get the response in writing(email). save all your emails(and) with full headers, forward to your personal email, and call it a day.

    obviously there's the practicality of keeping employed, so if you get pushed into a corner, do what he asks, but start building your firekit if the boss is that much of a dick. collect examples of other offenses that the company might have made. take that red stapler home with you. get your shit in order and prepare to leave or get fired. and if there are any threats(do this or i'm going to fire you) check with your local government labor department website. certain types of intimidation and coersion is illegal. also, depending on how much of a dread software-pirate roberts your boss is, you might consider contacting the fbi.

    think of it this way: you work in a bank, and your boss has instructed you to use a round off calculation to shave a penny off of every account in the bank(on a daily basis) into a seperate account held by the bank. when the bank gets caught, who do you think is in trouble? the guy who runs the bank, or the guy who implemented the penny shaving scheme? you are the hands, and the only way to clear your name is to have good docs showing your knowledge that the request is illegal, and that you were instructed otherwise.

    --
    three can keep a secret, if two are dead - benjamin franklin
  293. Your choices when presented with criminal actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in the workplace:

    1. quit immediately
    2. join the conspiracy

    Simply doing the bad thing with a defense of "I was ordered to do it" will get you in even more trouble, as you've decided to do something that you know is illegal = bad juju when it comes to prosecutions.

  294. High Horses by matthewcraig · · Score: 2

    These guys commenting need to get real. I have seen a lot of company IT departments, and so very few are completely pirate free. If your workplace does not have an unlicensed copy of WinZip or an evaluation copy of software that has run way past the evaluation, then you must have a very special organization.

    1. Re:High Horses by matthewcraig · · Score: 1

      And just to clarify, I am talking about situations where the software was not overlooked or tucked in the corner. I'm talking about base-loads or systems with users logging in and out regularly. If everyone of their IT staff members fled the scene signing resignation letters, then I think there'd be many empty cubicles. I wonder where all these high-horse folks work who leave these comments.

    2. Re:High Horses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, your company does this and you choose the psychological justification of "everyone is doing it" so you can fall asleep at night.

    3. Re:High Horses by matthewcraig · · Score: 1

      No -- I visit other companies. I just call it like I see it.

      When pressed, these sites have some flimsy justification where they roll their eyes and say, "We'll license that on the next audit." or "That's a software that we are evaluating our purchase." While I haven't seen any groups flying the skull and crossbones flag in their data-center, there certainly was not the strict Puritan attitudes we see here in these comments.

  295. Turn them in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A huge butt slapping from the BSA will convince them to not do it again.

  296. Actually it works that day. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Sorry to add myself to the "me too" crowd, but you don't know what you are talking about.

    If you are advising anybody in a professional capacity you should double check your facts before you land somebody in hot water.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Actually it works that day. by Darby · · Score: 1

      Sorry to add myself to the "me too" crowd, but you don't know what you are talking about.

      Actually I do.
      I'm not giving "professional advice", and I'm aware that going with what I'm saying has the potential to cause MS to engage in extortion against you.

      None of that changes the fact that just because they put something in an EULA does not mean that it is legal. The fact that the EULA is nothing but restrictions added to your use of your property *after* a legal sale demonstrates quite clearly that it's legality is on extremely shaky ground.

      It might be fair to say that you would be safer from barratry and extortion if you do follow the terms, but to say that any arbitrary terms a seller tries to impose on you after the sale is already complete is wrong.

  297. I would never turn them in... why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really think that if they get caught they'll say, "Yes, I made him do it and it's all my fault"?

    Or do you think they'll do everything they can to shove the responsibility on you and ruin your career to save their own skin?

    Have you insisted they put this in writing? Order you in black and white, on paper to do it? Or you have emails you can copy/print out to hang on to? Or is all this taking place in one-on-one conversations they can deny? I'm betting the latter.

    "My boss made me do it" isn't a legal defense. Yeah, if you refuse to do it or blow the whistle, you might lose your job. But if the company is caught and you went along with it, you'll lose your job AND could find yourself facing civil and/or criminal penalties.

    Personally, I'm not sure how that latter thing would look on a resume.

    Talk to a lawyer. Yesterday.

  298. This is not offending his ethics. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    This is to make him part of breaking the damn bloody law.

    In any case, decent people will risk things to make sure they remain ethical.

    People that bend their ethics, well, they don't really have any, no matter which excuses they give for it, as I have said elsewhere on this thread, doing the right thing is just that, nowhere it says it must be the easy thing to do.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  299. That is nonsense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    This is not an ethical issue, it is a legal one.

    One should must send an email like:

    "Can you remind me in how many machines do we have to install X? I would like to remind you we have no license left, please advice on this regard"

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  300. litigation by JexMann · · Score: 1

    Many people have suggested that your recourse upon termination would be to litigate. Most states in the US have "at will" employment contracts. As such, either the employee or the employer can terminate this relationship for virtually any reason. I would be interested in seeing an example of successful litigation for wrongful termination in a "whistleblower" case, especially against a government agency. While the mantra, "just sue 'em" is easy to say, as is "just quit", successful wrongful termination litigation is never easy. Jex Mann

  301. Can you spell illegal? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Good. Now go and find a defintion in the dictionary.

    Doing illegal things is the mark of an unprofessional employee, I am amazed that a few folks are trying to find any justifications, specially in the full knowledge that there are cheaper alternatives out there.

    If your company can't afford Office there is absolutely no excuse for them to use something else. This horse has been beaten to death in /. so I will not elaborate how this could be done.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  302. I would. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    First, I'd request a written order signed by the boss, specifying what they exactly request and awareness of legal problems. Then I'd freely proceed. It's not my ass that would be on a plate in case of a control.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  303. Are you sure it has to be illegal to install it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont have the eula/agreements in front of me, so I can't tell for sure.

    But most software licenses are not about copies, number of installs, etc.
    Software licenses are about use.

    From his description, it's not about copies. He's not copying the install media and giving it to people, so copyright is not in play.

    What he's being asked to do is to make it available to another user.

    Depending on the license, you can often make software available to more people than you have licensing for. This is usually only a problem if the software is licensed by named user in which case you are purchasing the license for an individual to use. But most software is not worded this way, and I think last time I looked office was not, as it was per use, not per user.

    Say you have a lab, with 20 machines, so you buy 20 copies of office.
    You run 3 8 hour shifts, and have 60 employees. So, you have 60 people using 20 licenses.
    ie, you have more people than purchased licenses, but, you never use more than 20 at a given time, since you are limited by the number of workstations in this lab.

    Now, take that to a larger number. If you can control the number of running copies in your enterprise, you can usually have it available to all the machines, and still be legal.

    ie, install it on a network share, and limit access to the bins by group. Or, install it on a keyserver that will keep counts of open licenses.

    What I'm saying is that perhaps we're looking at this problem with the wrong conclusion/solution.

  304. Stupid suggestion. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    That is a threat, why do you want him to lose the moral high ground?

    He could be easily described as a blackmailer for uttering such nonsense.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Stupid suggestion. by eric76 · · Score: 1

      You have got to be kidding. That's not even close to a threat.

      If he told the employer that he would turn them in to the BSA if they did it, that would be a threat.

      And it sure isn't blackmail. It would be blackmail if they did install pirated software on the machines and then he told the employer he would keep his mouth shut in exchange for some amount of money or a promotion. But just warning the employer about it is not a threat.

      Sheesh!

      It is something the employer should know about since any of their employees could turn them in and receive a nice cash reward from the BSA for doing so. There's no threat involved unless he explicitly or implicitly tells them that he is going to turn them in if they do it.

  305. What an stupid recommendation. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You just recommended the guy to brake the law.

    People that commit criminal offenses do it for all kind of reasons, putting food in the table is one of the lamest excuses to be used.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  306. Re:Stick to your guns and quit. (and DOCUMENT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, and the emailpasswords are provided by ICT, and you're not allowed to change them: they do that for you, management courtesy. Network-traffic is sniffed, logged, but only for certain people. Really makes one paranoia. I lost a stone in weight in half a year and wake up sweating. Posting AC, for obvious reasons. Famous phrase from team-leader ICT: 'Whatever I put in your file doesn't have to be true, you don't have to approve it." If they wanna fire you, you'll get fired.

  307. 4.- Don't do it. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    YOur position will be strong no matter the consequences.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  308. And if that doesn' work (Re:ns) by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    Just drop the name of the company and its practice in the right place and someone will make the call to the piracy hotline.

    Hey, I'm not big on ratting people out, but I'm tired of M$ justifying their high prices by being able to cite the cost of piracy. Come on people. Pay for your dang software if you want it so much.

    This scenario is exactly one I've had my students contemplate time and again. When they don't get to make the calls regarding budget and purchasing, they have to deal with management's decisions. When asked to do something that you understand to be illegal or immoral, you have to choose how to respond. Asking the question in a forum like this will generate a range of answers, each dependent on the moral outlook of each respondent. I wonder if the original poster really wanted to hear how this situation could be handled, or if all that was wanted was an easy way to justify a preferred course of action (like doing it regardless of license status, and getting on with life).

    I never cease to be amazed by how adept members of the human race are at deceiving themselves.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  309. Ethics by Benanov · · Score: 1

    I was told by a senior engineer on one of my first days of college:

    If you're working at a company and your superiors make you do something you know is illegal, unethical, or will kill or injure people, leave. You don't want to be working there anyway.

    ---

    Even though you were "overruled" and "following orders" if the company gets caught, the fingers of blame are initially going to be pointed at you.

    I understand that it's not easy to put ethics above feeding your family--start looking for a new job now.

  310. business based on piracy based on business by appelsiini · · Score: 0

    I've heard about companies with 3000+ employees and every single software is 100% pirate. Police could not care less, and anyway you can buy them off for $100. You can't even find shop from mainland china, that would sell LEGAL COPY of pretty much anything. Neither anybody could actually afford it.

  311. Perhaps you could lie like a dog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not certain of your exact circumstances, but if you patched OO.o a little bit, could you make it look close enough to MS Office to be mistaken for it? I'd assume that if anybody asked, you could either explain the whole situation (if the person seems trustworthy), or tell them that it's just a very new version that they are testing, and that's why everybody's using it... the possibilities are almost endless, and I'd think that nobody would seriously notice if they are just casual users. Of course, if they are that foolish, you might just have to program a little talking paperclip into the system, too...

    Oh, and I appologize if somebody else already suggested this. I don't have time to scan the entire thread.

  312. Do I look like a retard? by Evangelion · · Score: 1
    No, of course not. Aside from the obvious job security issues:
    1. Anything I need on Linux is likely free already.
    2. My managers are actually willing to spend money on things that are necessary.
    3. Most pirated software and even keygens has some form of trojan or something in it these days, and I'm not willing to risk embarrassing myself by getting an infection.

  313. Make them install it by cretog8 · · Score: 1

    It's just installing software, I imagine one of your bosses can handle it. If you don't want to quit, and you don't want to report them, you still don't want this to be primarily your responsibility if the business gets busted.

    Simply tell your boss(es) you're not comfortable installing illegal copies of software and suggest this problem can be worked around if they take care of it personally. Then, just maybe, they'll think a little bit harder about legal alternatives, and in any case, your ass is better covered.

    1. Re:Make them install it by bin+Dar+Dundet · · Score: 1

      Here's another twist.

      If installing software is a regular part of your job responsibilities, go to your immediate supervisor or the company's Human Resourses Department.

      Insist that your written job description be amended and re-dated to include the responsibility: Installs and maintains legally licensed software on company servers, workstations, etc.

      No reasonable organization should require any employee to break the law. Neither should they expect any employee to arrive at work each day without specifying in broad terms in writing what his/her job requires.

  314. There's many ways to punish... by sterno · · Score: 1

    The thing is, if he makes this stand and pisses them off there are any number of ways to punish him that don't run afoul of the law. No future promotions or raises. Cross promotions to jobs that are in some way unpleasant. When they make these moves they can vaguely site his poor job performance. Maybe down the line it might get to a jury, but even if he won, how's it all going to look when he submits his resume to the next employer?

    Personally I'd talk to a lawyer and see what they have to say. You want to make sure your ass is covered while you look for a new job.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:There's many ways to punish... by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      No future promotions or raises. Cross promotions to jobs that are in some way unpleasant. When they make these moves they can vaguely site his poor job performance.

      I think you missed the part where he said it was a "government job." There's no such thing as bad job performance. Everyone gets a raise, regardless. Promotions are typically based on seniority, not good job performance.

      Personally, I'd print the email and file it away, install the software, and bitch about how much better open source software would be over M$ Office every day to everyone. But that's just me....

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  315. Pirated software on the job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this might sound over the top, but I would personally take a hard line on this one. It doesn't sound like the boss cares about your well-being - they can just deny any knowledge that you, the Technician, installed pirated software; leaving you on the hook. So why should you be concerned about their business? You'll find another job, especially if you document your reporting and let your new employer know that you didn't want to break the law. Remember: you are breaking the law, and can be charged criminally. If you have any certs, say goodbye to them. Plus, be prepared to pay hefty fines.
    No, I personally would report to MS, and quit. In fact, I have. Once you threaten to not do it, they will force yo to the door anyhow, so try and get evidence, get them on the hook, and bust them.
    It's one thing to "try" a program, and entirely another to break the law in business in order to cut costs. Your cheap Manager or Company Owner is just going to bring everyone down. Places like that don't *stay* in business.

  316. Oops. by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

    Yes, thank you.
    Firefox's spellcheck doesn't do much good when you type the completely wrong word.

  317. They are not compatable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try typing in an equation to... [let's pick a tough one] round a number off to 2 decimal places:

    Excel:: =ROUND(A1,2)
    OOCalc:: =ROUND(A1;2)

    This is a SIMPLE case. Imagine if you had templates which were to be used across a corporation, where people at one location used Excel, and at another location, they used OOCalc... Templates made on one platform *might* work, in part, on the other platform, but would tend to break on simple things like comma separators vs. semicolon separators, in equations.

    I have OO on some of my lab computers, since I ran out of licenses for MSOffice, but I only use Calc for taking a quick look at the .csv files.

    While I'm on that subject, have you ever tried to import e.g. a .csv formatted file that had e.g. a .dat extension, in OOCalc? You have to start with Open->AnyFileType->Select your filename, then change the file type to Text(CSV) - the second Text File import option, IIRC, which a good page of scrolling down, on the file types listbox, at which point your .dat file disappears from the list of options to open... If you just take a .csv file, and try to open it directly, with OO, you get a FRIGGING TEXT DOCUMENT EDITOR, even if you try to open it via Calc.

    IMNSHO, OO is *not* ready for professional use. It is *not* ready for widespread corporate use. It *is* ready for use in areas which are not mission-critical, such as home users, writing business letters, balancing their checkbook, &c., but it's no where near ready for the Enterprise.

  318. Do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead, do it. Use someone else's account. You've got bills to pay.

    Hell, hack your boss' network account and use that one to install everything. And surf to some seedy sites that will cause much mischief later on using his account.

    You get paid, he gets slayed. Poetic justice.

  319. Install OpenOffice, Call it MS Office by Bob+the+Hamster · · Score: 1

    Here is what I would do if I was in your situation.

    I would get the Openoffice source distribution, and I would replace the OpenOffice logo with a Microsoft Office logo. Then I would change the product name from "OpenOffice" to "MSOffice". There is already functionality to do this within the build system (see how Sun rebrands their distribution as "StarOffice")

    Then I would install this "rebranded" OpenOffice distribution on all the required computers, and I would change the default document types to be microsoft formats.

    Then I would tell managment that I had done as they asked, and installed microsoft office.

  320. Argh, "verbal" != "oral" by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Document, document document - as in keep track of all communications and don't do any of it verbally.

    Sorry, but this is a real pet peeve of mine - "oral" is the word that means "by mouth". "verbal" means "using words" (as opposed to, say, pictograms) - could be either spoken or written.

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    1. Re:Argh, "verbal" != "oral" by nachoboy · · Score: 1

      It's an unfounded pet peeve. All the dictionaries I consulted list at least one definition of verbal that means "spoken". I think it's quite clear from the context this is the intended meaning here.

      Merriam - Webster: "spoken rather than written"
      Dictionary.com: "expressed in spoken words; oral rather than written"
      Encarta: "oral as opposed to written: relating to or consisting of spoken words, as opposed to written words"

  321. Installing Pirated Software for Your Employer by bin+Dar+Dundet · · Score: 1

    Not yesterday. Not today. Not tomorrow.

    No one should be trusted to cover your back, unless you relish the pain of a twisting blade between your shoulder blades.

    Any private company engaged in business should have built the cost into their business plan or their annual budget. Besides, there's always next fiscal year.

  322. Don't break. by luwain · · Score: 1

    Noone has the right to compel you to break the law. However, you need to be tactful and clever. I was in a similar situation in a company once, and this is how I handled it: 1) I explained in writing, why copying unlicensed Microsoft software was risky (this sould be easier now, seeing as almost all of Microsoft's products now feature activation) -- that the software may stop working at some point, how an OS update might disable or corrupt the unlicensed software, how certain free tools may require validation of the license, and how Microsoft could detect or discover the use of illegal copies and impose severe penalties on the company. 2) I explained the benefits of the alternatives: the money that could be saved by buying an enterprise license, or the free open source alternatives that nevertheless work seamlessly with Microsoft products without violating the law. 3) I explained how, that as an IT professional, it was unethical and illegal for me to willfully engage in pirating software, and how it would put my personal and professional life in jeopardy as well as put the company at risk -- (I attached some articles relating individuals and companies that had been caught and punished severely for such violations).

    I was careful to cc the e-mail to at least two people. If my immediate supervisor had insisted on the piracy, I would have again reiterated the points, this time cc'ing the e-mail to his superior and bcc'ing the legal department (or if the company did not have a legal department -- to my lawyer). Then if I were to be reprimanded or fired because of my refusal to commit a crime, the lawsuit would more than make up for the inconvenience, and it might be fun. As it was, they backed down, and allowed me to implement my solution ( they didn't go for buying an enterprise license, but instead bought a couple of licenses for the "senior" people and allowing the others to use Open Office). In the end, my solutions (...like purchasing $10.00 software that could read MS project files, and obtaining free software to create PDF files, etc...), enhanced my reputation as an IT guru, rather than atrracting resentment or anger.

    At all times my attitude was never confrontational or arrogant. It is important to appear that you are using your expertise and knowledge to guide your company on a productive, economic and legal path. Always act as though they didn't realise that what they wanted you to do was illegal. If they admit to knowing that what they want you to do is illegal and still insist that you do it (I doubt that many managers would be that stupid), just make sure you save those e-mails, but don't do the illegal activity. The law is on your side.

    You should find a professional company to work for. What kind of business is this that can't afford the tools to operate legally??

  323. Options that don't involve commiting a crime by i8-p · · Score: 1

    Complying with the order isn't an option, it's a crime. So here are options, as I see them (from my perspective as the money guy in this kind of situation):

    1. Request of the Controller *in writing* that he re-draft the budget to accomodate your legitimate software needs. Point out explicitly in your written request that his suggestion that you install the same software on multiple computers violates the license, and is legally equivalent to theft. Politically, it would be advantageous to include the caveat that you are sure he was not aware of this (even though he surely is). Put him on notice that you are unable to comply because the direction is illegal. It's his job to get the cash, and yours to do IT. If you get fired, that would suck, but getting fired for not doing something illegal is great grounds for an employment suit, and you'll find plenty of lawyers who would take that case on coningency, so won't do that unless they are complete dolts (which they might be).

    2. Find some other way to economize. What are these users using now? Why the sudden need to install this new software? Are they adding headcount? Upgrading the OS? Any reason I can think of requires significant additional expenditure by the company (which means many places to economize). If there is no additional cost savings to be found, someone mis-estimated when they budgeted (either you, or the Controller, which takes us back to #1 above).

    3. Quit. Feel real good about yourself and have a great story to tell about why you left this job that puts you in a very positive light.

  324. You would never turn them in... by aqk · · Score: 1

    But what do you think if the situation were reversed?
    OF COURSE! They would never turn you in, huh?
    Your comptroller is a fool.

    Get real. BLOW THE WHISTLE!

    I warned my company (Cleyn & Tinker - they went bankrupt anyhow) of the legal implications soon after I got there, and they quickly bit the bullet.
    And that was several years ago.
    Hmmnn,, actually more than a decade ago!, and it involved the disgustingly overpriced Loutus 1-2-3 and Wordperfect...


    An ex-salaryman.
    a non-anonymous non-coward. (even if I AM plonqued on Pinoqachole tonight!)

  325. Re:Install OpenOffice, Call it OO! by aqk · · Score: 1

    BS. What are you, a fool?

    The moment your boss found this out, you'd be gone. And so would your credibility/honesty.

    Install OO. Call it OO. And if the comptroller says to install illegal software instead, blow the whistle. And send HIM to jail.

    Whistle blowing like this happens all the time. I wouldn't worry- unless of course you work in Saudi Arabia, China, Phuckedupistan or... ummm, a multinational based in the USA?

  326. Re:The Agnostic Response... by aqk · · Score: 1

    ...Would be to refuse. I just quit my job because my employer's practices were illegal, and even though I don't believe I would've been doing anything illegal in participating I chose not to because I didn't want to disrespect the law, because I didn't want to help him break the law, and because I didn't want to be a hypocrite for telling him not to do something while I was glad for the opportunity since it gave me a job.

    I suggest reading some Plato, Upanishads, or even Kurt Vonnegut. It talks about the necessity of obeying the governing authorities.

    "Pure and undefiled altruism in the sight of our fellow man is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world." (James 1:27) If you're an agnostic then cleave to that. Tide detergent washes away those stains, but do what's good in the first place.

  327. Don't let this drag you down with it by Boehemyth · · Score: 1

    Technically, you are participating in an illegal activity. That means you can get in trouble with the law no matter how you voice your dissent. I'd start looking for a new job. Once you have one lined up, turn them in. That way they won't be able to take you down with them. They are bound to get caught eventually (and they should). Why should someone who is against the policy go down with them? Get out fast.

  328. To bad they get off by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I am not saying it is not possible, but merely that it is highly unlikely.

    A shame. If the crime were actually prosecuted there'd probably be a lot less of it.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)