Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Helps Police Crack Your Computer

IGnatius T Foobar writes "Microsoft has developed a small plug-in device that investigators can use to quickly extract forensic data from computers that "may have been used in crimes." It basically bypasses all of the Windows security (decrypting passwords, etc.) in order to eliminate all that pesky privacy when the police have physical access to your computer. Just one more reason not to run Windows on your computer."

558 comments

  1. Well, no windows for me by ChuckSchwab · · Score: 0, Funny

    I sure don't want investigators to find my child pornography!

    I guess I'll have to go with Ubuntu, although it's probably expensive, and I haven't worked out the illegality of those torrents people are posting.

  2. Flaw by Narpak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems to me that if all you need to do to get full access to anyones computer (anyone running Windows that is) is a Microsoft made device; that is a serious security flaw.

    1. Re:Flaw by EMeta · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, but since the cracking device itself is made by Microsoft, it's not likely to work most of the time anyway. Just MS doing their own part to safeguarding our liberties.

    2. Re:Flaw by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seems to me that if all you need to do to get full access to anyones computer (anyone running Windows that is) is a Microsoft made device; that is a serious security flaw.

      And, a scary precedent.

      When the man kicks in your door, hooks up his thumb drive to your Linux box and doesn't get what he wants ... you will have committed a crime by not making your information available in a format accessible to law enforcement. Only terrorists would do that.

      The above is a deliberately absurd example. One which I fear is less far fetched than one would have previously hoped.

      Mostly, I agree with some of the other posters here ... if Microsoft can make this, that means there's a defined mechanism you can use to completely defeat any form of security in Windows. And, that's bad; someone will figure this out.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Flaw by esocid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, it's Certified for Windows Vista!

      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    4. Re:Flaw by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      someone will figure this out.

      Someone HAS figured this out.

      At least, that's the only safe assumption you can make about any Windows box now.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:Flaw by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm sure Linux is safe. After all, it's not like you can replace parts of the kernel while the system is running or anything.

    6. Re:Flaw by squallbsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, this must be what that hidden NSAKEY/KEY2 encryption key is for...

      _NSAKEY

      --
      Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
    7. Re:Flaw by kernelphr34k · · Score: 0

      What about if there are already precautions about devices being plugged into your machine without a security flag?? Then when they stick there little pen drive in the 'target machine' and it gets rejected what they gonna do? Break or destroy your PC? Encryption at bootup? What now? That little device M$ made is now useless. I didn't see anything about this devices capabilities besides it having a ton of commands....

      I would have to agree with the person that mentioned something about the ultimate zeroday. Since M$ decided to create this device, now there is only a matter of time before someone else creates something better.

      My OS is more like swiss cheese, so many holes! I do however need to try out the latest ubuntu. :)

    8. Re:Flaw by lattyware · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well done for saying what was clearly stated in the article, pointing out the bloody obvious, +insightful to you sir!

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    9. Re:Flaw by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm sure Linux is safe. After all, it's not like you can replace parts of the kernel while the system is running or anything

      No, I'm not naively claiming Linux (or anything else is more inherently safe).

      But, given that someone will likely put this into an ActiveX control and convince people to download it like they do all of the other windows malware out there -- it will be a fairly widespread problem if/when it does become known.

      You want to hack into my FreeBSD box? You need to punch through my firewall, or convince me to download or run something which I by default have disabled. Likely, it would be a pretty manual process. Or, you gain physical access to the machine, in which case I have no hope in hell of keeping you out.

      Linux/FreeBSd etc aren't inherently more secure (mostly) -- they're just operated by people who are inherently more aware of security. Well, that and the fact that MS had made some blatantly bad assumptions about security in the past.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Flaw by trum4n · · Score: 1

      Look up ERD Commander. It will walk right though your security. It can access all your files, and even change your password. All you have to do is boot from the CD, and there is no way to stop that. You can disable it in BIOS, but i can get past a BIOS password and you could unplug the drive, but i can boot it off USB on most new systems.

      If you are running windows
      no matter what version:
      Security is a lie.

    11. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Winternals

      All they are doing is packaging ERD Commander which Microsoft recently purchased from Mark Russinovich and telling law enforcement, see you can use this to gain access to windows PC's. I've used it before to get into a few systems after taking over administration on client PC's.

    12. Re:Flaw by citizenklaw · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This is scary shite.

      --
      the future is but past forgotten
    13. Re:Flaw by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      It's not as scary as it seems. In the IT security world, if they have physical access, all bets are off. This goes for any machine/device and any OS. Even boot up BIOS passwords will probably not suffice.

      --

      Question everything

    14. Re:Flaw by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Most police departments already have Linux USB drives they boot and then mount your partition. This tool apparently just makes it as easy to grab files from an unencrypted Windows drive as it is for them to grab them from an unencrypted Linux drive, with the added "convenience" of auto-copying things out of My Documents.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    15. Re:Flaw by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Not a flaw, it was designed that way, as is every other OS I can think of. Let me get physical access to your disks and I can extract anything I want, whether it's Windows, Linux or OSX or any other OS for that matter.

      I would never dream of running Windows on a system without full disk encryption. Truecrypt is your friend, they can plug in their USB sticks all they want on my systems, all they'll ever find is a bunch of seemingly random data.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    16. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The above is a deliberately absurd example.

      It's hardly absurd. It's called "obstruction of justice". I've charged many people with obstruction for disobeying simple orders during a stop or arrest. It's a catch-all law that blurs the line between your civil rights and my ability to get what I want out of you, when I want it. What, you don't want to hand over your encryption keys? That's obstruction of justice.

    17. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Benefits on using a natural monopoly ....I hear this backdoor before. Someone once told me that certain microsoft staff have some sort of CD that will unlock any microsoft product. Apparently as the story goes an IT group lost the ability to login, (crtical data server), they called up microsoft and a microsoft official walked into the server room put the cd in the cd tray and unlocked the system.

    18. Re:Flaw by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      And if you are already logged into your machine when they arrest you? Seems to me that full disk encryption is only useful when the computer is already turned OFF when they break down the door.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    19. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lesson #1: Never EVER store your stuff on anything but a removable drive. Buy 2 drives that are identical. 1 is the decoy, the other is your stuff. when you think poo is about to hit the fan, hide your drive and plug in the decoy.

      Lesson #2: Don't trust your computer. It will rat on you. so you need to encrypt everything.

      Lesson #3: The best way to not get your door busted in is to NOT do your activities from home. Come on hackers and Crackers have known this for decades, The general public knew it when the abortion movie "Hackers" hit the screen.

      Lesson #4: Never EVER assume that what you are doing is legal. There are so many laws right now that I guarantee that the cops can nail you on something. Making sure that the populace is always guilty of something is a great way to justify your actions. Case in point, plain clothed officers get off for street style murdering a Groom to be and his friends in the street in NY. Hey cops have it tough, they need to be able to kill you for any reason.

      Finally, Never assume the cops or the legal system is about right and wrong. It's all about who pays them the most to oppress you. BSA, RIAA, MPAA, ACLU, EIEIO, whomever and whatever. It is not about protecting the public, never has been.

    20. Re:Flaw by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's hardly absurd. It's called "obstruction of justice". I've charged many people with obstruction for disobeying simple orders during a stop or arrest. It's a catch-all law that blurs the line between your civil rights and my ability to get what I want out of you, when I want it.

      Wow. Just fucking wow.

      So, either an AC is trolling by claiming to be a police officer who abuses due process. In which case I'm feeding trolls, and it's my bad.

      Or, an actual police officer is pointing out how he can basically stomp over the intent of the law and your rights by pulling out an unsubstantiated claim of obstruction of justice.

      If so, you're a perfect example of what is wrong in law enforcement, and why people have come to believe the cops are just thugs with authority. No wonder you posted anonymously. Thank you for demonstrating a new reason for increased cynicism about such things. No wonder people hate cops.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    21. Re:Flaw by BBandCMKRNL · · Score: 1

      That's nothing unusual. I think I still remember how to bypass all the security on a VMS system given access to the console.

      --
      Without the 2nd Amendment, the others are just suggestions.
    22. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clippy: "It looks like you are trying to violate somebody's civil right to privacy ... would you like to :
      a) [ ] get help, or
      b) [ ] just go ahead and violate them on your own?"

      Agent: [x] just go ahead and violate them on my own

      Clippy: "***STOP: 0X00000008E(0XC0000090, 0X004B4BD8, 0XEE25885C, 0X00000000)"

    23. Re:Flaw by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Not if u encrypt your files and change the passwords regularly using a random key generator
      which you then can use over and over once only

    24. Re:Flaw by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Why will someone figure this out?

      I imagine it's a matter of time before Microsoft's tool itself is posted to a torrent site.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    25. Re:Flaw by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      You forgot lesson 5: live a life of total paranoia, convinced that a device that lets law enforcement easily analyze computers is proof positive that a fascist government is out to get you, and that your choice in OS will be used in court to convict you and send you to jail for at least 15 years. Sell your house and build a cabin in Montana. Actually live in a cave on a hill nearby, where you can keep a watch on the cabin and make sure the Feds aren't moving in.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    26. Re:Flaw by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's hardly absurd. It's called "obstruction of justice". I've charged many people with obstruction for disobeying simple orders during a stop or arrest. It's a catch-all law that blurs the line between your civil rights and my ability to get what I want out of you, when I want it.
      Wow. Just fucking wow. So, either an AC is trolling by claiming to be a police officer who abuses due process. In which case I'm feeding trolls, and it's my bad. Or, an actual police officer is pointing out how he can basically stomp over the intent of the law and your rights by pulling out an unsubstantiated claim of obstruction of justice. If so, you're a perfect example of what is wrong in law enforcement, and why people have come to believe the cops are just thugs with authority. No wonder you posted anonymously. Thank you for demonstrating a new reason for increased cynicism about such things. No wonder people hate cops. Cheers No. That is exactly how Obstruction of Justice law is intended to be used. You destroy evidence, it's Obstruction of Justice. You don't hand over passwords, it is also.

      The OP is NOT abusing the system in any way shape or form - he's using the system as the system was intended.

      It's the SYSTEM that is abusive. It's the law that's wrong. Want another example? Google "civil forfeiture" and "criminal forfeiture." It's a nice way to fund government - they seize your farm because your stupid nephew had a couple of pot plants growing in your back 40.

      --
      This space available.
    27. Re:Flaw by Feyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      look on google for ntpasswd

      linux-based livecd that will reset any password on your windows partition.

      if you have physical access and it's not encrypted, any data is fair game, it doesnt have anything to do with microsoft (in fact, im pretty pissed at ms for making it such a hassle to reset a password)

    28. Re:Flaw by Isamura · · Score: 1

      Linux: The Child Pornographer's system of choice. But seriously, if someone has physical access to your machine, your data is comprimised anyways. About the only thing you can really do is destroy/wipe the harddrives to the point where they'd need an electron microscope to see the data.

    29. Re:Flaw by jo42 · · Score: 1

      There are more than a handful of freely available CDs available that can do this - reset the Administrator password, etc. As long as you can boot the system with the CD (or USB key). Use your Google Powers, Padawan.

    30. Re:Flaw by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Couldn't the same be done for Linux by booting up in single-user mode and editing /etc/shadow? I've used the software you speak of on Windows, before, and it works pretty well. You don't even have to go that far. You can copy the SAM file (or whatever the file is called) from a machine in which you do know the password to another machine on which you do not know the password, and just use the password from the other machine to log in. I had to do this once, because ntpasswd messed up writing to the NTFS drive, and I had to create windows boot disks and overwrite the SAM file with a known good one. Worked like a charm.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    31. Re:Flaw by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Hmmm ... in response to me saying

      When the man kicks in your door, hooks up his thumb drive to your Linux box and doesn't get what he wants ... you will have committed a crime by not making your information available in a format accessible to law enforcement. Only terrorists would do that.

      the OP said that was hardly an absurd example, and would be obstruction of justice. You say that is how obstruction of justice is supposed to work.

      Are you seriously postulating that if the police have the "magic secret decoder ring" which works on Windows boxes, plug it into a Linux box and don't get what they want, then I can be charged for Obstruction of Justice because the police officer is too stupid to understand that I'm complying and that his magic device won't work?

      My example was specifically chosen to be one in which you could comply and still be charged due to the stupidity of law enforcement. He also said he could use it to work around my civil liberties as he needed.

      I'm not getting a warm fuzzy that this does anything to preserve my rights or not unnecessarily shift the burden to me to prove I didn't do something.

      As I said, no wonder people distrust law enforcement. Because, in that context, it sounds like bullshit to me.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    32. Re:Flaw by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      It is pretty easy to hard shutdown (i.e. cut power) a machine quickly (generally only requires a couple of seconds) and particularly so when one has prepared for such an eventuality with an easily reached kill switch.

    33. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has had her computer taken by the man who kicked down the door we are already pretty close. I was told that if any of my files were encrypted in such a way that they could not access them that I would never see my data again. Not quite out right arrest but close.

      As a side note this investigation fell under the Patriot Act so I'm not sure if the 'standard' rules are different.

      Fun times.

    34. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man there are some dumb people on here. Like 400 other people have said - if you have physical access to the machine without hard drive encryption there's no security. Think about it for a few seconds and you'll get it. If you're paranoid, have a look at TrueCrypt.

    35. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a catch-all law that blurs the line between your civil rights and my ability to get what I want out of you, when I want it.

      My Mossberg 590 really doesn't care about your catch-all law, and will be used effectively and indiscriminately if *anyone* kicks my door in, law enforcement or not.

    36. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think that data stored on an unencrypted linux partition is any more secure than a windows box?

    37. Re:Flaw by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Couldn't the same be done for Linux by booting up in single-user mode and editing /etc/shadow? I think that's exactly the point. Password recovery on a Linux system is trivial. You don't even have to edit /etc/shadow. Boot from a CD login as root, and use the passwd command to update your root password. It can only be done if you have physical access to the machine. It's extremely difficult to accomplish that remotely.

      Windows just makes that process a PITA. It can be done by copying the SAM file, or using a third party utility, but I've run into a similar situation before and it's a hassle.
    38. Re:Flaw by doc_doofus · · Score: 1

      Dammit!! Now they know the plan!!
      You FOOL! You've killed us all!

      --
      Disclaimer:IANAL/MD/PhD-Just the local yokel PC "doc" ~If you're not having fun, then you are probably doing it wrong.
    39. Re:Flaw by kmcarr · · Score: 1

      It really has nothing to do with monopoly and may not be a true "back door". Back in the day when I was doing Windows Sysadmin I had a program called NTAccess. It was not created be Microsoft and it did not need access to any "back door". It was a modified version of the of the boot floppy for the NT installer. It allowed you to rewrite the Administrator password when the original was lost. Who knows, those Microsoft technicians may have actually been using this software.

    40. Re:Flaw by ricree · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. That is exactly how Obstruction of Justice law is intended to be used. You destroy evidence, it's Obstruction of Justice. You don't hand over passwords, it is also. Not necessarily. In United States v. Boucher for example, a US district court ruled that the fifth amendment protections extend to encryption keys. The ruling has been appealed, of course, so we'll have to wait and see what happens there, but if it stands then there would seem that you can withhold your key in many cases.
    41. Re:Flaw by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Even boot up BIOS passwords will not suffice.
      There, fixed that for you.

      I've had to reset BIOS passwords to reinstall an OS on computers before. AFAIK, most mobos have a way to reset the BIOS for this very reason. If not, then in the worst case, you remove the hard drive and install it in another computer from which you do have the ability to boot.
      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    42. Re:Flaw by mtgarden · · Score: 1

      Yes. ERD can do that, but can it do it while maintaining the volatile memory? Will it do that while catching the current connections to the PC? Those are very important to an investigation.

      If you have your TrueCrypt file mounted, then they can access it. With a reboot to use ERD, that can't happen. Any other encryption keys caught in memory (including IE passwords) will be lost on a reboot.

      So, what is scary is this: IF this device will bypass the screensaver password and grant access to the system via 1-2 clicks, then we are seeing a true backdoor into the system.

      Now, I have spent time with plenty of these types of investigators and they are good guys who are overworked now. You don't have to worry about them to much. What I now worry about is someone else reverse engineering this now that it is public knowledge.

    43. Re:Flaw by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Microsoft has developed a small plug-in device that investigators can use to quickly
      > extract forensic data from computers that "may have been used in crimes." It basically
      > bypasses all of the Windows security (decrypting passwords, etc.)

      Two days later:

      "Here's a list of 347 web sites where you can download this.

      Thirty seven days later:

      "Microsoft has issued a security alert because of a hack that will allow anyone to remotely access and take control of your computer."

      Six months later:

      "Microsoft has issued a patch via their patch update system. Also, there is no more backdoor utility."

      Three days later:

      "Here are 4,277 web sites where you can download the new government backdoor spying Microsoft utility."

      etc.

      Actually, I wondered a long time ago if the government didn't get all up in Microsoft's face about monopoly violations so they could induce them to secretly give up ways to invade computers remotely. A few show trials and penalties, and then the government decides it's done.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    44. Re:Flaw by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      When you want to violate the rights I am guaranteed -- yes, guaranteed -- by the Constitution, you'd better believe I will obstruct "justice". It may make your job more difficult, but that's not really my problem, is it? Because whether or not I actually committed a crime, whether or not I deserve to go to jail, I believe that the Constitution is more than ink on paper, and I will fight in any way I know how to protect those freedoms for myself, for my offspring and for everyone else in this country -- even if they think I'm wrong for not just rolling over when you flash your badge.

      And if you think charging someone with obstruction of justice for standing up for their rights is a reason to send someone to jail, you should revisit that oath you took when you became a uniformed officer, dude.

      --Mike Wallette (not an A.C., and proud of it!)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    45. Re:Flaw by ender- · · Score: 1

      And if you are already logged into your machine when they arrest you? Seems to me that full disk encryption is only useful when the computer is already turned OFF when they break down the door. Which is why I have my laptop configured to hibernate at the touch of a button. If the door breaks down, I hit the button. Once it is hibernated, you need the disk encryption password to get anything.

      Of course, then there's my work laptop, which supposedly has whole-disk encryption, but boots up and never asks for any passwords. Not sure how that works.
    46. Re:Flaw by Calinous · · Score: 1

      Officially, encrypted data on the hard drive is lost if the password is forcefully changed (by any means other than , Change Password or a dialog where the old password is introduced too).
            Resetting a password (when you have a working administrator account) is as simple as going to Control Panel, Users, Advanced, and "Change password" (or use the User Management in Computer Management)

    47. Re:Flaw by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that data stored on an unencrypted linux partition is any more secure than a windows box?

      Where, exactly, do I assert that?

      The problem is, when law enforcement has a single tool that they think will automagically gather the data it needs, and if that tool isn't the one-size fits all they think it is ... you could conceivably be charged with not cooperating with them when in fact, they're tool is inadequate.

      If their magic thumb drive from Microsoft fails to work, and if they don't understand the technical limitations of it, some poor schmuck can get into legal trouble.

      It's not about asserting that a Linux partition is inherently more secure. As has been pointed out, if you have physical access to the machine, security becomes largely a moot point. It's more about being able to explain to a police office who doesn't know shit about computers that his thumb drive will simply not do what he wants it to.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    48. Re:Flaw by dwye · · Score: 1

      > You forgot lesson 5: live a life of total paranoia,
      > convinced that a device that lets law enforcement
      > easily analyze computers is proof positive that a
      > fascist government is out to get you

      Felix Djerzhinsky's Law: Live your life like everything [in permanent format] will be read by your worst enemy and/or best friend, whichever is worse.

    49. Re:Flaw by SiChemist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you are doing is NOT password recovery-- it is RESETTING the password. Resetting a password is trivial on Linux and Windows (if you have physical access), but the article says this device can decrypt passwords on the system. That is worth worrying a little.

    50. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, when windows detects a new device it will automatically look for drivers on CD and windows update. It's been rather easy for a while to compromise a computer by making a driver/rootkit and then plugging in the appropriate device, for example.

      Something along this lines could be easy to do. MS probably wrote a little module that creates an admin user or some such.

    51. Re:Flaw by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      that means there's a defined mechanism you can use to completely defeat any form of security in Windows. And, that's bad; someone will figure this out. The user???
    52. Re:Flaw by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      Mark Russinovich ROCKS. I got ERD commander/locksmith, and it busted this PC Laptop wide open, except for all the folders had a system-wide domain lock. Nice... ok.. policy editor? It would have taken me 3 months to get everyfolder right so...

      Microsoft on the OS CD for W2k provides a file with the default GPOs for the OS. Worked PERFECTLY on XP SP2, to own all the folders and files, including alt streams. I am going to try it on a W2k3 Active Directory next, because this method totally owned ever w2k, w2k server, XP Home( no security or policy editor, and XP Pro box Ive used it on. Nice to be able to read the employee time sheets...

    53. Re:Flaw by Feyr · · Score: 1

      indeed it's a password reset, which is what i said, not a recovery. but do you trust a journalist to know the difference? i know i don't

    54. Re:Flaw by couchslug · · Score: 1

      ntpasswd is a dandy tool, and there are hordes of live Window (WinPE, BartPE)/DOS/Linux single and multiboot live CDs that make owning anything ya can get access to trivial. The same tools are being installed on USB sticks for convenience.

      It would be interesting to know what's on the MSFT USB keys so we can add that to our admin toolkits.

      Live CDs are as basic a tool as boot floppies were in ancient times. I'm surprised every geek doesn't have a stack of them.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    55. Re:Flaw by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      Even boot up BIOS passwords will probably not suffice. A BIOS boot password is useless against physical access. Won't slow them down by 30 seconds, unless your PC case is really hard to open.
      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    56. Re:Flaw by SiChemist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      indeed it's a password reset, which is what i said, not a recovery. but do you trust a journalist to know the difference? i know i don't Good thing I wasn't replying to you :-)

      The article says

      It also eliminates the need to seize a computer itself, which typically involves disconnecting from a network, turning off the power and potentially losing data. Instead, the investigator can scan for evidence on site. Which implies that it can break in without cycling the power. That sounds more like password extraction rather than resetting. I can only go by what the article wrote, rather than speculating about what they might have meant.
    57. Re:Flaw by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      Really, it's just a matter of time before someone loses this device and someone reverse engineers it and starts selling it on eBay. What microsoft genius asshole came up with this brilliant accident waiting to happen?

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    58. Re:Flaw by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Prosecutor: "Isn't it true sir, that you used the same operating system software as Hans Reiser?"
      Defense Counsel: "Objection!"
      Prosecutor: *louder* "And in fact, used Hans Reiser's Filesyst.."
      Defense Counsel: "Objection!"
      Judge: "Sustained. Counselor, we've discussed this in chambers earlier."
      Prosecutor: "Withdrawn." *Looks knowingly to the jury*
      Judge: "The jury is to disregard...

    59. Re:Flaw by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

      How is this any different than getting full access to a Linux computer using a live CD?

    60. Re:Flaw by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
      "Couldn't the same be done for Linux by booting up in single-user mode and editing /etc/shadow?"

      Sorta, but you can always insert a blank pw hash into the SAM for Administrator's account and get right in, whereas you at least have to cough up an MD-5 hash of a password you actually know before inserting it into /etc/shadow.

      'course, it'd be easier to just chroot the HDD's / directory, then just run 'passwd' - two commands and no editing required. :)

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    61. Re:Flaw by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      That is why truecrupt has TWO encrypted partitions. One you use for your daily work and which contains nothing out of the ordinary and a second that is hidden and which contains whatever you want to hide and with a different password.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    62. Re:Flaw by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I knew a guy who knew a german hacker who had every single combination of a 9 digit password stored on a bunch of disk drives.

      He could supposedly recover any password off any file in a matter of hours.

    63. Re:Flaw by trum4n · · Score: 1

      ERD can claim ownership of an entire drive. Takes about 11 seconds. *Right click on C:, properties, claim ownership button!*

    64. Re:Flaw by MilesAttacca · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he used rainbow tables? I've spent the last couple of months putting my computer toward generating them (so far, just for LM hashes). The precomputation time is worth it when you're nearly guaranteed password cracks in a matter of minutes; no waiting for every single password to be brute forced one at a time.

      Of course, I don't really have a need for such an ability (unless someone wants me to test their own systems' password strength, or I lock myself out of the Windows install that I never use), but it's nice to be able to brag.

      --
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smoke, and have sex. Put this in your sig if you like bagels.
    65. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit.

      Typable characters on a standard keyboard amount to 94 possibilities: 26x2 alphabetic (both cases) plus 21 other keys with shifted and unshifted characters on them.

      For 9 digits, with 94 possibilities per digit, using 1TB hard disks, your "german hacker" would require almost SIX-HUNDRED-THOUSAND hard drives (assuming RAID0 or no RAID and minimal file-system "overhead").

      I have to say, that would be quite a server farm!

      (94^9 = 572 994 802 228 616 704 bytes)

      Futhermore, I'm no cryptologist, but with one-way encryption (MD5 for example), my understanding is that you only have brute-force as an option. In that circumstance, how would having 570PB of information pre-stored be a faster solution than simply using 9 nested loops to generate them on the fly?

      -AC

    66. Re:Flaw by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...you gain physical access to the machine...

      That's why, if you have deep dark secrets, you make sure only you have physical access to it. A tiny USB chip, only plugged into the computer when working with the secret stuff, is easy to unplug quickly and made to disappear into a secret spot.

      --
      All theory is gray
    67. Re:Flaw by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...What, you don't want to hand over your encryption keys? That's obstruction of justice....

      No, he courts have ruled that the 5th amendment applies here in the USA. The government cannot force you to testify. Even if they know you have some incriminating evidence, they cannot make you give it to them.

      --
      All theory is gray
    68. Re:Flaw by Evets · · Score: 1

      The tables for LM hashes have already been generated and are downloadable if you google around.

      MD5 is more secure than LM, but it's not impossible to do, it just requires more horsepower.

      If I'm not mistaken, there's an open source live cd that uses rainbow tables to get you into a windows machine within a few minutes.

    69. Re:Flaw by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....You destroy evidence, it's Obstruction of Justice. You don't hand over passwords, it is also....

      No, there is a distinction there. Not giving evidence is not the same as destroying it. There are court ruling on this. In the US, you do NOT have to give them the password. They have the evidence, all of it, in the encrypted files. If they cannot read the evidence, that's their problem. It would be the same as if you put papers into an impregnable safe, that could not be opened, not mater how hard they tried. They could not force you to give them the combination. However, if the safe turned out not to be impregnable and they did get it open, they could use any evidence inside against you.

      --
      All theory is gray
    70. Re:Flaw by MilesAttacca · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it was more fun to learn how to set up the generation process myself. :) My most recent set of tables covers all alphanumeric characters, space, and 14 symbols to 99% accuracy, in 3GB. NTLM and MD5 are almost time-prohibitive for my hardware collection, unfortunately, so my ambitions there are a lot smaller, but they are the next step.

      I'm not sure if it's open-source, but I believe that would be OphCrack, by Objectif Securite. It works like a dream, but they want you to shell out a lot for their "perfected" tables with special character support and all. It's really neat though.

      --
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smoke, and have sex. Put this in your sig if you like bagels.
    71. Re:Flaw by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      There will come a time when people quit taking
      shit from corrupt police. When that day comes,
      expect it to be a very violent and unpleasant day.

      Back on subject though:

      It's a simple concept to ./'s but apparently not
      the rest of the world.

      DO NOT KEEP QUESTIONABLE DATA
      UNENCRYPTED ON YOUR COMPUTER. EVER.

      Period. Simple as that.

      It's not a perfect setup. Keyloggers and whatnot
      will bypass even the toughest encryption scheme.
      As will your partner in crime if he gets busted
      and plea bargins your ass for a lighter sentence.

      It'll help tremendously if the man kicks your
      door down and confiscates everything. It's more
      realistic than thermite containers above your
      hard drives :) Though that would work too. . .

    72. Re:Flaw by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Its not like the Crypto AG hardware.
      The NSA does not need to be inside to read it in real time.
      The box just needs a net connection and have MS running.
      The NSA can rely on MS and its greed, incompetance and marketing department.
      Security is expensive and its hard to sell.
      So anything MS ships is always Certified Windows Visit.
      No need to ascribe to the NSA that which is adequately explained by marketing.
      Now the tube connection you to the outside world, thats where the NSA plays for real.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    73. Re:Flaw by sjames · · Score: 1

      That is indeed MUCH more concerning. It's bad enough that there is a tool MS puts out (presumably only to law enforcement), but the simple fact that the password CAN be decrypted in any way at all is deeply concerning. If it can be done, black hats can figure out how and make their own tool.

      It's especially dangerous that it can be accomplished without taking the machine down.

      By contrast, linux passwords can be changed but not recovered. Because /etc/shadow contains secure hashes, nobody knows of a method faster than brute force to figure out what password generates that hash. Given physical access and a willingness to reboot, passing init=/bin/bash will drop you directly to a root prompt. You can then remount r/w and set a new root password, but the legitimate root operator is quite likely to notice that, even more so on a server.

    74. Re:Flaw by kyz · · Score: 1

      I'm no cryptologist, but with one-way encryption (MD5 for example), my understanding is that you only have brute-force as an option. In that circumstance, how would having 570PB of information pre-stored be a faster solution than simply using 9 nested loops to generate them on the fly? Well, that's what file systems do...

      Let's say your password MD5 sum is "0123456789ABCDEFFEDCBA9876543210". I have my full set of MD5 rainbow tables on my giant SAN. I type "cat /rainbow/01/23/45/67/89/AB/CD/EF/FE/DC/BA/98/76/54/32/10.txt" and it prints your password. The system reads a total of 16 directory contents (a few milliseconds each) and it gets to the file with your password.

      As for the storage, it's not just 94^9, as that's only passwords that are exactly 9 characters long. You also need 94^8, 97^7, ... and it would be that many files, not that many bytes.
      --
      Does my bum look big in this?
    75. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how much Microsoft is selling this device for?

    76. Re:Flaw by sjames · · Score: 1

      Of course, you can get rid of /dev/mem and /dev/kmem (the drivers, not just the device nodes) and eliminate CAP_MODULE after booting by chnging cap_best. Then, no modules, no hot patching the kernel.

    77. Re:Flaw by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      Im not sure where you have gone wrong in your calculation but there are websites that have searchable databases of rainbow tables. I used one for a forensic computing course assignment, and it works way faster then doing brute force attacks.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_tables for more info (personally I was never 100% on how it worked either but I know it works)

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    78. Re:Flaw by Herby+Sagues · · Score: 1

      Nope, it doesnt work without a reboot, the comment just means that the machine doesn't need to be disassembled, and that since it is a standardized process, it can be used by the police on site without damaging evidence. The tool is just an easy to use front end for techniques that have been available for decades for Windows and other OSs. it doesn't work for encrypted data, though, so I suspect any serious criminals are safe from the police.

    79. Re:Flaw by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      You don't even have to do that, do this

      Boot linux with the options init=/bin/bash

      for instance, from lilo (or grub, or whatever), say the booting kernel is named MyKernel

      MyKernel init=/bin/bash

      you get this, a good old root prompt:
      #

      Now mount it writable if you want:
      mount -o remount,rw /

      Now you can change the password, or whatever you like. Nice to have if you forget what your root is...do need console access to do it though.

    80. Re:Flaw by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      PS: run sync after you do this to write the changes, and then do a reboot. The great thing about this method is you do not need to have a cdrom, floppy or anything else but the hard disks own boot manager...very handy if your out in the field.

    81. Re:Flaw by fractoid · · Score: 1

      The wording was "9 digit passwords". If you're restricting it to numbers only, that makes it significantly quicker... and also makes storing the combos rather stupid.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    82. Re:Flaw by AusIV · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea at what point you get charged with obstruction of justice? Suppose the police come barreling through your front door (presumably with a warrant) and demand you give them the keys for your hard drive. Can you plead the fifth at the time, and hand over the keys only after a judge's order (and consulting a lawyer)? Or is it obstruction of justice to postpone obeying the police until you've had legal council?

    83. Re:Flaw by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      NO SURPRISE!

      Apple doesn't; however, there is a device that does a similar thing that is available already for Mac from a 3rd party.

      The premise applies to any system where an app can be run under current user (or the guest user) and gain read access to decryption/encryption RAM.

      Its HIGHLY likely that a company like Microsoft would store your passwords in an encrypted file that only the government can decode in addition to leaving in backdoors into RAM. Its not unrealistic to log all keystrokes on the system and have that go unnoticed on such a closed system (hell, a special bios could do it and use bios flash for storage.) There are millions of weak spots and you are forced to trust your compiler, OS, and hardware to be on your side.

      COLOR PRINTERS have been printing serial numbers on them so your papers can track back to you. This was voluntary. Anti-virus companies were asked to ignore government software; bet they volunteered as well! ISPs were asked to handover your netwok traffic. We don't know the extents of this stuff.

      Congress has discussed many times about encryption standards with backdoors on CSPAN and despite their clear ignorance one can only wonder about some of those secret laws passed and secret presidential orders that we know happened but do not know what they contained. So much has been discovered that was done voluntarily and became public already without any legislation.

    84. Re:Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if they have a warrant, and you don't give it up, they will charge you with obstructing justice. Now, the courts will throw it out; the 5th ammendment and all. However, the cops, who aren't constitutional lawyers, will charge you with obstructing justice if you refuse to give up information when they show up with a search warrant.

    85. Re:Flaw by Eivind · · Score: 1

      That's a good trick, assuming you mean 9-character rather than 9-digit (I don't know anyone who uses pure numbers for passwords)

      There's around 100 characters one can use in a password, so 9-characters means there are 100^9 possibilities. That is 10^18. Each hash typically takes 16 bytes or thereabouts, so that works out to 1.6 * 10^19 bytes. A terabyte is (well, depending on if you mean 1000^X or 1024^x) 10^12 bytes, so that is 1.6 * 10^7 terabytes, or 16000000 terabytes.

      That's more than "a bunch" of diskdrives, it is about 8000 metric tonnes of disk-drives, or about 40 A380s FULLY loaded with diskdrives. Nevermind powersupplies, mounting, and assorted stuff.

      Now, if he limits himself to only 9-character passwords that consist of lower-case-letters and digits only, then it's only 36^9 hashes, or aproximately 1700 terabyte-disks. That is still more than "a bunch", but sligthly more practical. Cut it to 8-character and it's actually practical though.

    86. Re:Flaw by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Ah, but since the cracking device itself is made by Microsoft, it's not likely to work most of the time anyway. Just MS doing their own part to safeguarding our liberties.

      Additionally, you'll know if someone has used this on you..if you no longer see "Unknown Hardware Found-Windows was unable to configure this device or find a driver for this hardware." when you plug something into your PCs' USB port(s), it may be time to retain legal counsel!

      Yes, I know. Sorry.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    87. Re:Flaw by NerdyLove · · Score: 1

      You don't even need to do that to reset a windows password. Just boot from a windows 2000 setup disk, it doesn't require a password as the XP disk does. Just boot in recover mode and do "net user "

    88. Re:Flaw by NerdyLove · · Score: 1

      /.'s parsing messed that up. "net user username newpassword" is the command.

  3. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like we are surprised-

  4. What could possibly go wrong? by mrbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reverse engineering and (more) malicious usage in 3... 2... 1.

    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by nawcom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reverse engineering and (more) malicious usage in 3... 2... 1. Link to torrent of the COFEE thumb drive image on TPB in 3... 2... 1.
    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Narpak · · Score: 1

      I am sure they are already easily available at a market in Kairo.

    3. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by tokul · · Score: 3, Informative

      Reverse engineering and ...

      Why do you have to reverse engineer it when tools already exist?

    4. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by saintsfan · · Score: 1

      agreed. this "tool" will be more prevelent with crackers then law enforcement soon if it's not already. dd if of done. i agree that similar tools exist already, but with script kids and low brow criminals, the easier it is to use, i.e. plug into a usb drive and select from a menu, the more likely they will.
      while a combination of auditing tools/techniques can be used to gather the same info already, this will make it all too convenient to get at the valuable personal info. of course the really dangerous ones will be the mods that incorporate malware, although they probably have it already anyways. next step, lock out usb devices without authentication.

    5. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      What if I don't want to simply want to read anything on your hard drive, but write anything.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  5. This works! by towelie-ban · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're already selling these online. Just check the box next to "I certify I'm a cop. Seriously, I am." and it's all yours for $19.95.

    1. Re:This works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and this is the first we've heard of this? Where are they being sold?

    2. Re:This works! by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1
      from TFA:

      More than 2,000 officers in 15 countries, including Poland, the Philippines, Germany, New Zealand and the United States, are using the device, which Microsoft provides free. 19.95 is a rip off! that's like trying to sell iTunes 99 songs for $20 per 10 song CD! who would do such a thing....besides RIAA
    3. Re:This works! by rgo · · Score: 1

      I got mine for free with a Diebold voting machine key.

    4. Re:This works! by Technician · · Score: 1

      They're already selling these online. Just check the box next to "I certify I'm a cop. Seriously, I am." and it's all yours for $19.95.

      Obvious fake. The article stated these were free to law inforcement.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  6. Here it comes... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cue the "if you have nothing to hide..." responses (and possibly some Hans Reiser jokes).

    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    1. Re:Here it comes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have nothing to hide, except my journal.

    2. Re:Here it comes... by fropenn · · Score: 1

      The police would still need to obtain a warrant before searching your computer. It's only a breach of privacy if the police begin searching computers without warrants or if the devices are used by non-law enforcement individuals (e.g., coworkers) to snoop around on your machine while you are at lunch.

    3. Re:Here it comes... by Fuzi719 · · Score: 1

      Under the current administration's "rules", the police do not need (or at least they don't think they need) a warrant. The FBI can simply issue a security letter that can be as vague as they like and the Patriot Act authorizes them to do as they please, without a judge ever getting scrutiny.

    4. Re:Here it comes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have nothing to hide. I store my data on a killer filesystem.

    5. Re:Here it comes... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's exactly how it works with telephones, too

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  7. To save your time by trifish · · Score: 1

    The summary and article in one word:

    FUD

    1. Re:To save your time by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Not this time actually.

      Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt is how they sway you away from competing products. Here they are just selling one of their own, with no mention of a competing product.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:To save your time by habbi · · Score: 0

      I think I have another summary:
      "be a smart ass criminal, use linux".
      meh.

  8. How the - by Fynd · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...bypasses all of the Windows security... All of the Windows security - I can't even fathom how complex that device must be, that sure is a lot of security to bypass.
    1. Re:How the - by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 0

      You are attempting to bypass all the security on this system:

      Cancel or Allow?

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    2. Re:How the - by pilgrim23 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did anyone else notice that the Microsoft spokesman's name is...Mr. (Agent?) Smith?

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:How the - by InlawBiker · · Score: 1

      I can only imagine it's a collection of small apps and scripts that locate important files and registry values. These are already available, all over the place. Most of them are free.

      By saying it bypasses *all* security, that would include full disk encryption and somehow obtaining admin access. I find it very hard to believe that this is the case.

      I'd be real interested to see this USB key examined. There should be a bounty paid to the first person to get their hands on one.

    4. Re:How the - by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it goes something like this:

      copy c:\*.* f:\kiddie porn\

      (or whatever the removable drive letter is)

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    5. Re:How the - by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      You can get yours here.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    6. Re:How the - by cloakable · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's just standard Microsoft tools that make calls through the law_enforcement_bypass_security() API.

      --
      No tyrant thrives when every subject says no.
    7. Re:How the - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Requisite DRM troll ...

      No, not all security. Of course, you can't use it to copy rights protected music and media. You don't want to encourage police corruption by allowing them to steal music this way.

    8. Re:How the - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Smith? What are the odds of that? Oh, never mind.

  9. What changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this different than anybody else cracking a Windows box ;-)

  10. Interesting thought by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 1

    This article poses a question I've always wondered about. Do most criminal investigations of the computer-related nature have experts that are well-versed in multiple operating systems? Seeing as to how this is government, I would guess the answer is "no," and that is partly why we have this... uhh... "benefit" from Microsoft to aid our investigators.

    Makes me curious as to what would happen if, for some reason, my computer were seized and the police booted up to an Ubuntu welcome screen... heh...

    --

    Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

    1. Re:Interesting thought by AltGrendel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Makes me curious as to what would happen if, for some reason, my computer were seized and the police booted up to an Ubuntu welcome screen... heh...

      They would probably post questions to "Ask Slashdot".

      --
      The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

      - Douglas Adams

    2. Re:Interesting thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me curious as to what would happen if, for some reason, my computer were seized and the police booted up to an Ubuntu welcome screen Arrested for treason. Filthy communist.

    3. Re:Interesting thought by EasyTarget · · Score: 2

      No.
      They'll get my FreeBSD box, fail to understand it, probably reformat the RAID drives trying to run a 'disk checker' on them. Then use this as evidence of my wrongoing.

      "He had a 'so called' open computer, that no 'normal' person can understand, breaking all Microsoft's standards and patents. It's made of Demons! burn the TERRORIST!!!"

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    4. Re:Interesting thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah I use Ubuntu just to escape the awful windows environments. sadly I must use XP at work.

      Really though, if someone really really really wants to gain access to your information, nothing can stop them if they have the available time.

    5. Re:Interesting thought by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      They just hire consultants. It's pointless to have a bunch of computer security guys on your staff when it's a tiny minority of your crimes that are dealing with computer issues.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    6. Re:Interesting thought by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Give me your root password or I'll fire.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    7. Re:Interesting thought by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      If there's a valid reason to perform a full search, they'll pay to get the job done, regardless of weather or not they can do it internally. Of course, by handling the windows case in-house, most searches can be handled internally.

      They don't just give up if they get a unix shell and let the killer go.

    8. Re:Interesting thought by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      This article poses a question I've always wondered about. Do most criminal investigations of the computer-related nature have experts that are well-versed in multiple operating systems?

      From what I've seen, no. According to an FBI guy I know, as of a few years ago when the FBI found a Mac during an investigation, they shipped it to the RCMP (canadian mounties) for analysis. There is also a fairly well known computer forensics program at the university nearby (one of the largest of such programs in the country). They do cover Linux and NTFS but very sparsely. Most of the Linux stuff is about setting up a and using a Linux box as an investigative tool, not investigating other Linux machines. They don't even mention OS X, *BSD, Solaris, etc. in any of their class descriptions. They do mention DOS.

    9. Re:Interesting thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A majority of my graduate Computer Forensics computing program is in linux and unix. All the tools are basically unix and linux. There are higher level classes for the tools to be used in Windows, but since alot of stuff is written in C and C Variants its minimal.

      Half of the doctorate students are pretty much black hats who have gone back to the light side.

      Thanks for playing though.

    10. Re:Interesting thought by Pezdro · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is no longer true. Secret Service uses tons of Unix and Linux tools. They also require you be quite verse in multiple operating systems just to get an internship.

    11. Re:Interesting thought by Minupla · · Score: 1

      Yep, I was one at one point. Seconded from my day job to assist the feds in an investigation because they didn't have any local resources. This was back in 97 when resources were a bit more scarce tho.

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    12. Re:Interesting thought by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Is the University U of Toronto? I know the Toronto Police have a "cybercrime" unit (just typing that word makes me cringe)that works closely with U of T.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    13. Re:Interesting thought by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      They do mention DOS.

      As well they should.

      I've personally worked with a DOS machine, in a business, this year. Didn't think I'd still see DOS in 2008.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    14. Re:Interesting thought by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      "They would probably post questions to "Ask Slashdot"."

      I can see it now.

      GoodCopBadCop writes: I'm in law enforcement and need to do some forensic investigation of a computer system called "Ubuntu", does anyone on SlashDot know what this is and how to crack the system? ....

      Anonymous Coward replies -- First RTFM!!!! WoooT

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    15. Re:Interesting thought by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Give me your root password or I'll fire.

      D-0-N-T-T-A-Z-3-M-3-B-R-0-!-!-!

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    16. Re:Interesting thought by blueg3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. Most criminal investigations have experts well-versed in many operating systems. More regional departments may not have Macintosh or Unix experts, though almost all computer forensic investigators have familiarity with Unix, and would send the computer to another office. There are a lot of experts working in law enforcement, so if their case is important enough, your hardware will be shipped to an office that has an expert.

      They wouldn't boot your machine, though. They'd remove the drive, duplicate it, and then look at the duplicate through a hardware write blocker. Software would probably indicate that the majority of the disk was ext2/whatever Unix format you use partitions, and the layout of the root partition would make it fairly clear you were using a Unix variant. If they really wanted to "boot" your machine, they'd boot an image of your drive using a VM.

    17. Re:Interesting thought by holmedog · · Score: 1

      mod +insightful. It annoys me to no end how many people think that running ANYTHING will matter when a computer gets to forensics. They don't boot your system, they duplicate the drive and run their own forensic tools on the duplicated drive. When a computer is confinscated, most of the time they will actually remove the hard drive from the box before taking it out of the house.

    18. Re:Interesting thought by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

      So have I. It had Windows 3.1 on it, but all of the business-related programs ran in DOS only. I don't know if the user actually knew it had Windows on it, not that they'd be likely to recognize 3.1 as "Windows".

    19. Re:Interesting thought by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

      Half of the doctorate students are pretty much black hats who have gone back to the light side.

      You mean they're blackhats who want to be paid for violating the sanctity of other people's private spaces?

      Of course they want to work for the government... They're less likely to be shot or tortured by their lords in the above ground mafia (government) in this situation than they would if their masters were the underground mafia. And government employees can steal from the government with great ease and low punishment, while those working for the mafia tend to get hurt badly for stealing. Government also, only rarely kills its own, and then usually as some form of false flag attack (common throughout history, regardless the pretenses of justice of most governments). As a result, given that such blackhats would be "information specialists" they might receive a tipoff. Seriously, how can they lose by joining the most successful mafia in history? (aka government)

      Now, onto this "light" side bullshit... AHEM: "subject".

      Light side is always made to seem like such a good thing, yet we should not forget that the original tyrants always were "of the light side", whether the samurai ruling caste that tyrannized the peasants in Japan, or the Mafia ruling caste that tyrannized the peasants in Italy, Corsica, Sicily, or the Holy Church ruling caste that tyrannized the peasantry in Europe or the Pharisee ruling caste that tyrannized the Hebrew commoners, or, as a final example, the Puritan peasants, who for lack of a master to tyrannize them, decided to tyrannize themselves (see Salem, Massachusetts, witch trials.)

      The so called light side has proclaimed itself as 'good' without giving a definition of good, except saying "its what you should want" or "it's whatever we say it is." They've declared some vacuous evil dark side as the ever present enemy. A faceless evil to always be feared and never known or understood. Again, 'evil' is not defined in their context, except saying "it is to be afraid of". And the masses have followed, always fearful, taking the bait, hook line and sinker.

      And in order to be part of the "light side" you have to join their hierarchy, worship their rulers, kiss the arses of the task masters, and be a good little serf. Then, if the rulers feel your lips have moistened their arse cheeks enough, you may get promoted to a 'position of higher responsibility' which basically means you'll be given your own little fiefdom of serfs to tyrannize. And then you'll be "somebody" in the hierarchy. You'll be more special than the poor bastards you get to order around.

      Yep, "light side" sure is "good".

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    20. Re:Interesting thought by Aram+Fingal · · Score: 1

      According to a computer forensics textbook, which I have at home (or I would post the citation), they would send it out to an expert on that OS. There are various forensics labs which specialize in different OS and device types. It's not just desktop OSes, there are all those PDA and similar devices out there.

    21. Re:Interesting thought by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod! You just POSTED MY PASS---- Oh...ummm...nevermind.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    22. Re:Interesting thought by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Your sig is very, very funny in light of your post :)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    23. Re:Interesting thought by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      They'll get my FreeBSD box, fail to understand it, reformat the RAID drives trying to run a 'disk checker' on them.

      Negative, sir. One of the first things any investigator would do is hook each original drive up to a write blocker and copy it to a drive on which they do the actual work. Without using a write blocker, defense could likely get the evidence thrown out under the auspices of planted evidence and/or sloppy investigation methods.

    24. Re:Interesting thought by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      They do mention DOS. As well they should. I've personally worked with a DOS machine, in a business, this year. Didn't think I'd still see DOS in 2008. GlaDOS?
      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    25. Re:Interesting thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my case, they'd boot to an Ubuntu screen asking for the password to unlock the disk. heh heh.

      My disk is encrypted, my backups are encrypted with OpenSSL, and the screen auto-locks after a couple of minutes of inactivity.

      If you're not paranoid, you haven't been paying attention.

    26. Re:Interesting thought by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      I think they can call on a world wide network of experts.
      All can do windows at a local level.
      If the OS in the 0.5 to 7% user zone, they can call a friend.
      e.g. mb Canada has a task force that knows Macs really, really well.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    27. Re:Interesting thought by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Anything in Alberta?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    28. Re:Interesting thought by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      It's made of Demons!

      *BSD? No need to reformat the drives, they could tell it was made of demons just by seeing the logo.

    29. Re:Interesting thought by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Your honor, the defendant was using reiserfs, clearly he was intending to murder his wife.

  11. I dunno... by Otter · · Score: 2, Informative
    It basically bypasses all of the Windows security...

    The article is extremely vague, but I don't see where this assertion came from. It sounds like they're distributing USB drives with a collection of cracking and monitoring tools; like what any self-respecting 1337 h4x0r carries around with him. If that's correct, there's no reason to think the same thing couldn't be done for Linux.

    1. Re:I dunno... by AngelKurisu · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the difference is Linux isn't made with intentional security holes that the maker obscures and then peddles to law enforcement agencies. It's no doubt in the works that Microsoft will charge for these services at some point down the line. Who'd have thought, shoddy security is just another revenue stream!

      --
      Whack a Catgirl: You know you want to!
    2. Re:I dunno... by Otter · · Score: 1
      Yes, but the difference is Linux isn't made with intentional security holes that the maker obscures and then peddles to law enforcement agencies.

      Could you please point out the part of the story where you and the submitter are getting this "bypassing security" thing from?

    3. Re:I dunno... by BigJClark · · Score: 1



      Perhaps I'm the only one versed in extremely low level haxoring techniques, employed over generations and generations of haxingors, but why not serve a warrant, obtain said computer, then use the boot disk? :)

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    4. Re:I dunno... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      Right, but what happens when that cop tries to copy c:\windows\system32 (cause IIS defaults to putting its logfiles in there) from the hard drive to the pen drive; that's what step 18 in the carefully laid out instructions say. He really doesn't want to tinker, because evidence has to be gathered a certain way, to be used in court. He got promoted from a different post last year, and has been sent to lots of training on forensics for windows systems.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    5. Re:I dunno... by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      In this day and age, the police no longer need warrents.

    6. Re:I dunno... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Uh, can you point to a section of the article that indicates that intential security holes were built in? Last I checked, if you have physical access to any computer, you can get in.

    7. Re:I dunno... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I RTFA [hangs head in shame] and reached the same conclusion -- it's probably just a collection of standard hacker tools, with a few handy scripts to do the grunt work for you.

      Hell, it may be just the Hacking Exposed collection (available for Windows and Linux) plus some scripts. BTW those are wonderful books for anyone with even a casual interest in security!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:I dunno... by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      Uh, can you point to a section of the article that indicates that intential security holes were built in? Last I checked, if you have physical access to any computer, you can get in.

      If by that, you mean "boot Knoppix, mount drive and view files", then you fail. FTA:

      It also eliminates the need to seize a computer itself, which typically involves disconnecting from a network, turning off the power and potentially losing data. Instead, the investigator can scan for evidence on site.

      The thing cracks passwords and gives access to the content of the machine without a single reboot, so I guess it needs quite a wide security hole in the currently running operating system to do that.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    9. Re:I dunno... by Otter · · Score: 1
      The thing cracks passwords and gives access to the content of the machine without a single reboot, so I guess it needs quite a wide security hole in the currently running operating system to do that.

      I get what you're saying, but think you're reading way too much into that one sentence, particularly to draw a conclusion as dramatic as Microsoft installing backdoors and then handing out cracking devices like Halloween candy.

    10. Re:I dunno... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe some organization doesn't, but all of the regional police departments I'm familiar with all still need warrants. It's a real pain for forensic analysis when a warrant for a computer specifies that you can only "look at" specific things, since "look at" is not usually written in terms that map very well to hard-drive analysis.

    11. Re:I dunno... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Because you want access to information provided by a running machine (that is, data in RAM, essentially -- although just capturing an image of RAM and then powering down the machine isn't as useful as using API functions to find active network connections, etc.).

      The classic case where this is important for law enforcement is people using encryption. If your encrypted partition is mounted -- or hell, maybe if it's not -- the key is almost certainly readily-available in memory. You don't want to lose that.

    12. Re:I dunno... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      If it uses security vulnerabilities to perform its tasks (which is not necessarily true), it almost certainly uses well-known vulnerabilities that other people already use. What they don't have is a user-friendly tool on a USB disk that works without being a computer forensics expert. If a real hacker has physical access to your running machine, it's almost certain they will get access to what they're interested in.

      There are a lot of big security holes in Windows. Two I can think of off the top of my head are circumventing Windows password login via FireWire while the machine is running and putting a malicious executable (say, one that makes a copy of the contents of your memory) on a U3 USB disk, if the target machine doesn't have Autorun disabled.

    13. Re:I dunno... by Abalamahalamatandra · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen anyone else actually thinking about the way this works, so I'll say it:

      Think about your Windows machine: do you run as a local admin? Likely. Do you have your CD drive set to allow autorun? Also likely, as that's the default. Certainly most of the systems that will be targeted by this tool will be configured that way.

      What exactly else is needed to pull copies of any file on your system? It's game over, even if you're running BitLocker or another full-disk encryption product.

      On Linux, however, in the first place, this disk is unlikely to have the proper tools installed. Even if they are installed, Linux supports only limited autorun functionality, if any at all. The user in question also is very unlikely to be running with root privileges - it will almost certainly require a password to read anything like /etc/shadow or other sensitive files.

      So if you see "no reason to think the same thing couldn't be done for Linux", then you're either a shill, naive, or not thinking.

      Given that a tool like this, even one written for Linux, is unlikely to work without asking the investigated user to enter their root password (which could easily be construed as self-incrimination and lead to the gathered evidence being thrown out), the relevant authorities will likely confiscate the entire system.

      Which leads back to drive encryption - unless the system is up and stays up, they'll have a tough time decrypting that data.

      Another pet peeve I have on Windows: even if you encrypt the files, guess what? There's this great registry tree called "OpenSaveMRU" that keeps track of the name and location of every file you've opened or saved via standard file dialogs. In the registry, unencrypted. When I do forensics I make damned sure to save off that tree, it has very valuable information.

      Ubuntu (Gnome actually) has sort of the same thing in the "Recent Documents" entry under the Places menu. But that's easy to kill - nuke the file ".recently-used.xbel" in your home directory and replace it with a directory of the same name. Not so on Windows, all you can do is use a script to regularly delete the contents of the OpenSaveMRU tree.

    14. Re:I dunno... by Otter · · Score: 1
      So if you see "no reason to think the same thing couldn't be done for Linux", then you're either a shill, naive, or not thinking.

      Dude, calm down.

      I'm not interested in arguing whether it's easier to perform some unspecified act on Windows than on Linux under some completely random set of circumstances you just made up. The question is whether, as the submitter claims and the editor believes, that Windows has a deliberately engineered backdoor to which your local police have the key. It does not, and Windows and Linux are therefore (very roughly) back on the same playing field. That's all.

    15. Re:I dunno... by Abalamahalamatandra · · Score: 1

      I'm calm.

      But to suggest that Windows and Linux "are therefore (very roughly) back on the same playing field" because Windows doesn't (necessarily) have a deliberate backdoor is simply not true. I illustrated quite clearly the difference and the reason they aren't on the same playing field - because Windows security all but requires that users run as local administrators, and because Windows has autorun enabled by default that will run a designated application on any media inserted.

      This isn't a "completely random set of circumstances", it's a common scenario, and the scenario that likely allows this tool to steal sensitive information from almost any random Windows machine to which one has physical access.

      I'm no rabid Linux fan (though I do like it a lot and use it daily) but if you're not going to be upfront about the plain fact that Linux systems have better security by default that don't allow these scenarios to take place, expect to be called out on it.

    16. Re:I dunno... by SBrach · · Score: 1

      Explain how this would work with Vista. Using the default settings that is.

    17. Re:I dunno... by Technician · · Score: 1

      Explain how this would work with Vista. Using the default settings that is.

      Are you claiming CD and other isertable media is no longer auto-run in Vista? Next time I'm near a Vista machine, I'll have to see if a CD or thumb drive auto-runs... Thanks for the info. I'll be sure to check it out. It's a step in the right direction if true.

      Quick Google search.....

      Oh, wait nevermind. I found about Vista and auto run here;

      Windows Vista by default shows an AutoPlay dialog (right) to ask whether you want to run the AutoRun software.

      If you select "Set AutoPlay defaults in Control Panel" then the window below lets you alter the AutoPlay and AutoRun default options.


      http://www.phdcc.com/shellrun/autorun.htm

      All the guy has to do that has physical access to your machine is OK a dialog box. Yea, that will stop them dead in their tracks.... End sarcasm..

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    18. Re:I dunno... by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      UNIX: Everything is a file.

      Microsoft Windows: Everything is a revenue stream.

  12. Thankfully I run Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All linux boxes come with a depleted uranium case that prevents physical access to the machine.

    1. Re:Thankfully I run Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I bought mine from Dell.

    2. Re:Thankfully I run Linux by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Truly, a non-working computer is the ultimate in protection.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:Thankfully I run Linux by trooper9 · · Score: 1

      Whew! I bet shipping was a bitch.

      --
      blah
  13. It's okay! by AngelKurisu · · Score: 1

    There's no way this could fall into the hands of someone unsavory. Newp.

    --
    Whack a Catgirl: You know you want to!
  14. If this isn't just vicious rumour... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    My PC is going on eBay.

    I'll game on a console from now on, and get a laptop that is compatible with Ubuntu.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:If this isn't just vicious rumour... by anss123 · · Score: 1

      Tools like this have existed for a long time. The fact of the matter is that unless you encrypt your hard drive and store the encryption keys somewhere NOT on your hard drive your files can be read. Ubuntu is no better than Windows here and consoles are worse (if it's privacy your after).

    2. Re:If this isn't just vicious rumour... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - get rid of that non-linux compatible pc. That'll show them!

    3. Re:If this isn't just vicious rumour... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I have tools like this, and probably BETTER tools than distributed on this USB drive.

      I'm doing it from a moral standpoint; I don't need a Microsoft PC to game, and that's all I use Microsoft software for. My new Mobile contract will come with a free PS3 so I can game all I want in Hi-Def, play DVD's etc, and i'll run Linux on a laptop / barebones PC because I don't need anything Microsoft offers.

      I'm doing this to spite Microsoft; I may even stop buying games associated with Microsoft Studios, and I buy a lot of games. I simply object to this blatant display of total irrelavence to end-user satisfaction, and my way of saying "I am not ammused." will be to not use Microsoft products any more.

      I know it's quite a hollow gesture, being only one person, but I'll be sure to add into my Objectives next year to research Open Source alternatives to Microsoft products in Primary and Secondary education. Losing £x00,000 in volume licensing for Windows Server, Client, Exchange, and Office applications is much more likely to be noticed.

      N.B. the odd A with the circumflex doesn't appear in the editting box; I can't remove it.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:If this isn't just vicious rumour... by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      Tools like this have existed for a long time. The fact of the matter is that unless you encrypt your hard drive and store the encryption keys somewhere NOT on your hard drive your files can be read. Ubuntu is no better than Windows here and consoles are worse (if it's privacy your after).

      Please show me a tool I can simply plug into a running Ubuntu machine that would give me full access to the whole system without rebooting (thus losing all that is stored in RAM)?

      FTA : It also eliminates the need to seize a computer itself, which typically involves disconnecting from a network, turning off the power and potentially losing data. Instead, the investigator can scan for evidence on site.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    5. Re:If this isn't just vicious rumour... by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu's just as easy. So is MacOSX, BSD, or Unix. You can win on any of those OSs just by encrypting your files, though.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    6. Re:If this isn't just vicious rumour... by anss123 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't be that hard to put some scripts on an USB disk, would it? That's basically what this MS USB thingamajig is. It does not exploit some backdoor in the USB stack, so if you log out right before the FBI breaks down your door and delete all encryption keys you're safe. But if the FBI now comes home to find your computer logged in and running they can extract data right away instead of turning it off and sending it to a crime lab.

    7. Re:If this isn't just vicious rumour... by anss123 · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why the state buys so much closed source software and flaky solutions. With the money they throw about they should demand source ownership. Instead they pay thousands of $ for programs like one recent I saw for deleting all PDF files older than five days.

      Congrats with the free PS3. Right now the PS3 has one game I want to play (Heavenly sword) so I almost envy you. I figure I'll get it when it becomes dirt cheap. Perhaps I'll buy yours when you unload it for the PS4 :)

      Oh, and I'm sure you put the  there on purpose!

    8. Re:If this isn't just vicious rumour... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I think those characters are Slashdot's equivalent of fnords.

    9. Re:If this isn't just vicious rumour... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The more fun part is they are now *you*.
      Any admin rights/ops on a server or other network is now a huge honey pot.
      They will now run it as you did for some time.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:If this isn't just vicious rumour... by anss123 · · Score: 1

      You can win on any of those OSs just by encrypting your files, though. No, you still have to store your encryption key in some safe spot. *BSD doesn't magically solve that problem and you can in fact encrypt files on Windows.
  15. The ultimate zero-day exploit by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the ultimate exploit. MSFT is hardly going to close these security holes. I wonder when copies of this USB drive (and network-enabled variants of the attacks) will be employed by malware and botnet vendors.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:The ultimate zero-day exploit by syd02 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry...it was designed by Microsoft, so you know it's secure.

    2. Re:The ultimate zero-day exploit by CambodiaSam · · Score: 1

      It's the potential for a bluetooth/wireless mod that frightens me. Then, if some kind of wireless is physically enabled, then passing through any public place (like an airport for instance) could mean passive extractions of all my data. That's really not much of a stretch.

      Ok, I think I'll revert to a #2 pencil and big chief tablet now.

  16. If It's Possible... by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

    So, the sheer fact that there is a device that can do this also means that anybody can do this because the methods are in place for bypassing security. It's only a matter of time before someone spends enough energy to develop a device that can do this (outside of Microsoft).

    The implications of a device like this are scary to say the least. Although I'm not a Microsoft hater, this alone is more than enough to make me take a second look at options other than Microsoft Windows.

    1. Re:If It's Possible... by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, the sheer fact that there is a device that can do this also means that anybody can do this because the methods are in place for bypassing security. It's only a matter of time before someone spends enough energy to develop a device that can do this (outside of Microsoft).

      No. The ONLY question that is of any interest is whether or not this device actually has a back door to Windows encryption. Somehow I seriously doubt that it does. Its probably little more than a bootable drive with NTFS support, and some tools. If you've got a password on your login, it doesn't mean you are using encryption. And this tool probably just lets you get straight to searching the -unencrypted- disk without cracking the login, or without pulling the drive and installing it somewhere else to scan through.

      The implications of a device like this are scary to say the least. Although I'm not a Microsoft hater, this alone is more than enough to make me take a second look at options other than Microsoft Windows.

      I suspect your average Linux LiveCD Recovery Disk has all the same tools on it. MS is just getting on board with their own version, to remove another area, where, right now, you have to use Linux. If that's the case the implications aren't scary at all.

      And this whole are article is pure FUD.

      Unless they've provided a back door to the encryption. That is the -only- question. But I really doubt they have.

    2. Re:If It's Possible... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yea, look at linux...No way would it be possible to reset the root password if you had physical access to the machine.

      I can't believe all the people who are freaking out about this. This isn't a remote exploit. This isn't a massive security hole. This is trivial stuff that anyone who is reasonably computer savvy should be able to do.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:If It's Possible... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      This is already built into Ubuntu: http://xkcd.com/416/

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    4. Re:If It's Possible... by idlemind · · Score: 1

      You're right except the article isn't really FUD itself. The submitter is just reading too much into it and spinning it as FUD.

    5. Re:If It's Possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computer forensics don't even do it like this. When they raid your computer the very first thing that they do is pull the power, so that your computer can't even shutdown. They want your hard drive to stop in its tracks. The plug something in to the hard drive that creates read only access then copy the whole thing over to a model. Your physical hard drive may then be disconnected and stored as evidence. All further investigation takes place using the model (using specialized software tools). This way they have a complete snapshot of your hard drive. Since all file systems are types of linked lists. File system type doesn't matter, encryption does. However, they have all the time and tools in the world to crack the virtual model that they have of your hardware. Any tool from MS would just make it quicker, but if your weren't running MS, it would still happen.

    6. Re:If It's Possible... by KraftDinner · · Score: 1

      Its probably little more than a bootable drive with NTFS support, and some tools. I have a similar device. It's a CD called ERD Commander.
    7. Re:If It's Possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mostly right. The only difference (and the reason MS created this tool) is that BitLocker, once shut down, is uncrackable. This tool will run a dos command (available to anybody logged in) that will get the BitLocker key so that you can mount the drive in a forensic acquisition tool and be able to read the drive. It doesn't exploit holes, it doesn't 'crack' anything. It's a tool for untrained local law enforcement to secure a computer during a search warrant so that it is usable for the computer forensic experts. It isn't malicious, it doesn't eat babies, it doesn't even spew split-pea-soup 360 degrees.

    8. Re:If It's Possible... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      It's not uproar at the fact that it's POSSIBLE, it's that Microsoft just dishes this stuff out.

      Loading a live-cd and changing the Admin password on windows is a piece of piss; I've done it many a time. I object to it from a moral standpoint.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    9. Re:If It's Possible... by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      Google around a bit. It's a USB stick with a bunch of sysinternals tools on it. It even gives a nice gui that explains what the tools are for.

      It would be neat if microsoft had a device that used any of the cdrom emulation, or firewire DMA issues to bypass locked machines etc, but I am pretty sure they don't.

    10. Re:If It's Possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the technical among us always be able to use various tools to manipulate computers? Certainly.

      I think this is more of an issue of privacy where the customer (me) who paid for a product (Windows) has his privacy undermined by the same company. I don't want MS to give this to law enforcement. I want them to make the system so hard to crack my privacy is safe from anyone unless I consent.

      Instead, the company who should be representing me, the client, is instead representing law enforcement. If you went to the store, which OS would you buy... Law enforcement OS, RIAA OS, or Privacy based OS?

      I support law enforcement, but not like this.

    11. Re:If It's Possible... by lord3nd3r · · Score: 1

      which is why my filesystems are encrypted into my swap. decrypt that beotches.. :P

      --
      g0t b33r?
    12. Re:If It's Possible... by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      Yea, look at linux...No way would it be possible to reset the root password if you had physical access to the machine.

      I can't believe all the people who are freaking out about this. This isn't a remote exploit. This isn't a massive security hole. This is trivial stuff that anyone who is reasonably computer savvy should be able to do.

      That's all good. Now, try doing that, but without losing all the evidence currently stored in RAM (a ramdisk, a buffer not yet sync'ed to the disk, cache, application data, etc.). The Microsoft device lets you do that : It also eliminates the need to seize a computer itself, which typically involves disconnecting from a network, turning off the power and potentially losing data. Instead, the investigator can scan for evidence on site.

      Yes, this is a massive security hole. The investigator only needs physical access because he wants to plug in the USB drive (probably because of procedure and need to do that to get admisible evidence). What is on the USB drive is software though, and software can be made remotely. Evil computer haxxors don't care about procedure, and they don't need physical access to use that hole.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    13. Re:If It's Possible... by alcmaeon · · Score: 1

      The ONLY question that is of any interest is whether or not this device actually has a back door to Windows encryption.

      Agreed.

      Somehow I seriously doubt that it does.

      Why? Have you seen the source or something? TFA says that the device "can decrypt passwords and analyze a computer's Internet activity, as well as data stored in the computer."

      Now, granted TFA is lean on details and somewhat muddled as all articles tend to be, but unless you have information the writers didn't have, I would be curious what the basis of your doubt is.

    14. Re:If It's Possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What struck me as the most surprising issue was that it says it decrypts passwords (haven't RTFA yet though) which implies that the passwords aren't using a one way hash.

      I don't care about getting access to the hard drive or resetting passwords, that can be done with any LiveCD on any distro... but the passwords themselves should be one-way hashed

    15. Re:If It's Possible... by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      What is on the USB drive is software though, and software can be made remotely. Evil computer haxxors don't care about procedure, and they don't need physical access to use that hole.

      Good point, but I think there are enough security holes in Windows that adding this extra one won't affect the hacker community.

      An interesting twist: This security hole is being called a "Feature".

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    16. Re:If It's Possible... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      That's true, but the big push now is for first-responder tools that can capture the running state of the machine before powering it down -- mostly so that encryption keys for mounted encrypted filesystems (e.g., BitLocker) can be acquired.

    17. Re:If It's Possible... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Why?

      Logic.

      If the government actually had a backdoor to Windows encyrption, it would only be valuable if they kept it a secret.

      If it existed, and the keys to using it will be passed around to low level law enforcement flunkies, it will be a -very- short time before anyone who wants one (or at least a copy of one) will have one.

      At which point Windows EFS is completely worthless because ANYONE can hack it. It will be the new WEP. Anyone who wants security will use something else. And Microsoft is left with a technology nobody wants, nobody who actually cares about security will use, and they'll either have to fix it, or let 3rd party products take the market. Its a big lose for Microsoft.

      I'm not saying EFS isn't about to become the next WEP, but its not likely. Of course, anyone using EFS (or any other encryption) should always stay abreast of the news surrounding its security. In this case, I'm sure we'll have first hand information about just what this key can and can't do shortly, and we can pass judgement then.

      But until we find out more don't panic. Its premature to abandon EFS based on this article.

    18. Re:If It's Possible... by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      The fine article states:

      "It also eliminates the need to seize a computer itself, which typically involves disconnecting from a network, turning off the power and potentially losing data. Instead, the investigator can scan for evidence on site."

      Which implies that the tool can extract data from a RUNNING MACHINE. The issue at hand is: Do we now trust Windows cryptography?

      "These are things that we invest substantial resources in, but not from the perspective of selling to make money," Smith said in an interview.

      Now there is not much in the article -- just enough to eliminate Windows encryption as viable. Indeed, I would also not use TruCrypt either; we have to assume that it is also comprimised by simply being on the platform. After all, it is a closed source platform, and one of the key Microsoft players has just let the cat out of the bag.

      Now, the tool may end up being "nothing"; maybe just ntfs recovery on a USB key. But... the trust is gone. The proper response is "I am sorry. There is no way to access the data without the passphrase. No recovery is currently possible.". The security issue is then reduced to key management.

      The surprise with this announcement is that the CSP (cryptographic service providers) in Windows XP have been FIPS 140 certified (at least to level 1, and possibly level 2 for some things), which means that any "back-doors" must be very clever indeed. I would even venture that the new Microsoft Crack Box doesn't attack the CSP, but somehow bypasses it. In other words, best results probably if the system ISN'T powered off... But that's just speculation on my part.

      As a PS: I always thought (but I could be wrong) that FIPS 140 certification ALSO meant best practices with key control in memory, including scrubbing after using. I would now look for weakness in that area, if I were a "black-hat".

      Of course, your trust quotient may be much higher than mine.

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    19. Re:If It's Possible... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Which implies that the tool can extract data from a RUNNING MACHINE. The issue at hand is: Do we now trust Windows cryptography?

      It *implies* no such thing.

      If the machine is running, logged in, and so on, then all the locks are already open, and you can just run tools to scan the disk. For example, the usb device may simply be to let law enforcement run 'standardized tools' in a standardized way without having to install software etc. No different than running a copy of firefox with custom plugins etc from a usb drive when using a public pc for example.

      This might just makes it so joe-average-cop can do a file search via a simplified and standardized interface without having to do much else.

      It would be interesting to know if this device will even unlock a PC that is 'locked'.

      True, it says it can 'decrypt passwords', but that's almost worthless. Does it mean it recover my saved email password for social networking site/ free webmail service/ etc from Internet explorer's saved passwords feature? Or that it can recover my EFS passphrase?

      One is considerably more serious/meaningful than the other. The article really doesn't say anything of real value. Anyone using the security features of windows should want to know more, but shouldn't panic yet.

      Of course, your trust quotient may be much higher than mine.

      My trust quotient is quite low. But my paranoia quotient is fairly low too.

    20. Re:If It's Possible... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The fine article states:...

      Turns out I can do one better. From an actual press release from Microsoft:

      "COFEE, a preconfigured, automated tool fits on a USB thumb drive. Prior to COFEE the equivalent work would require a computer forensics expert to enter 150 complex commands manually through a process that could take three to four hours. With COFEE, you simply plug into a running computer to extract the data with the click of one button --completing the work in about 20 minutes."

      Its little more than a preconfigured, automated tool, that does stuff that could already be done, but makes it easier, and is something joe-beat-cop can use instead of bringing a computer expert along.

    21. Re:If It's Possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they've provided a back door to the encryption. That is the -only- question. But I really doubt they have. actually...
    22. Re:If It's Possible... by rajkiran_g · · Score: 1
      From the article,

      It also eliminates the need to seize a computer itself, which typically involves disconnecting from a network, turning off the power and potentially losing data. Instead, the investigator can scan for evidence on site.

      Does it mean, you don't even have to reboot? If it is true, that means there are back doors.

    23. Re:If It's Possible... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Does it mean, you don't even have to reboot? If it is true, that means there are back doors.

      Quite the contrary. Think about it. If you are using EFS, and have already logged in, authenticated, and so on... and then someone plugs in a USB drive with some command line tools... say...something like grep for example, and a fancy gui for it.

      Then they'd plug in the usb key, open it from my computer (or more often it autoruns)... then they do push some simple buttons in the gui... and grep gets sent out to do a system wide scan for...

      porn, password, child, etc, etc...
      some other utility scans the IE folder for saved passwords
      some other utility does... whatever.

      If they had seized the PC, and shut it off. They'd be screwed. The contents of the hard drive are encrypted and basically untouchable because they don't have any keys. They'd have to brute force your login, which, if the security policy and passphrase were set up correctly could take decades.

      If you read the press release from Microsoft about COFEE, which I linked elsewhere in this thread already, the device just automates a bunch of stuff a computer forensics expert can ALREADY do, but the device saves considerable time and requires less expertise to use.

      I'm sure some slashdotter will end up with a COFEE soon enough, especially if they are being distributed the way they are... and we'll all see exactly what it does. I'm pretty sure we're not going to find any "HOLY CRAP I CAN'T BELIEVE THEY DID THAT" revelations in it.

    24. Re:If It's Possible... by visible.frylock · · Score: 1

      Author of the article has posted an update. Details are still sketchy. Some highlights:

      Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel, described COFEE in an interview.

      "It's basically a thumb drive that is like a Swiss army knife for law enforcement officials that are investigating computer crimes. If you're a law enforcement official and let's say you have access to a computer that might be used, for example, by a child predator, a lot of times they have information on their hard disk that's encrypted, and you've got that information off in order to have a successful investigation and prosecution.

      "In the past, people would have to literally unplug the computer, they would lose whatever was in RAM. They'd have to transport it somewhere else, and it would take at least four hours, often more to get at the heart of the information."

      The device can get that job done in as little as 20 minutes, Smith said.

      "With this tool, they can just plug it into the computer, wherever it's located. They don't have to turn off the power. It has over 150 different technology tools that law enforcement officers can use to analyze data, to get access to passwords, to obtain the information typically that people need to successfully prosecute a crime."

      Update: Via email, a Microsoft spokeswoman said COFEE is a compilation of publicly available forensics tools, such as "password security auditing technologies" used to access information "on a live Windows system." She cited rainbow tables as an example of other such tools, and "was NOT confirming that COFEE includes Rainbow Tables."

      It "does not circumvent Windows Vista BitLocker encryption or undermine any protections in Windows through secret 'backdoors' or other undocumented means."

      Further, she reiterated that the tool is intended for use "by law enforcement only with proper legal authority."

      Another update: This from Tim Cranton, associate general counsel at Microsoft: "The key to COFEE is not new forensic tools, but rather the creation of an easy to use, automated forensic tool at the scene. It's the ease of use, speed, and consistency of evidence extraction that is key."

      Firstly, we must concede up front that miscommunication within MS is certainly possible, and that none of this info is reliable. After all, we have two esteemed counselors and a spokeswomen. IOW, technical competence not guaranteed.

      In the first quote, he is obviously talking about a live system investigation. That implies subversion or cooperation, which is already weird enough. He says "it would take at least four hours" in reference to encryption, which alludes to brute force key cracking/guessing. And then "The device can get that job done in as little as 20 minutes, Smith said." What job? Key crack? If so, it must be either with owner cooperation or with a back door (possibly referring to an MS proprietary encryption as parent alluded to). This can be accomplished by a backdoor for the encryption itself, or by an escalation to god mode (access to all RAM contents). But I was under the impression (contrary to how nix works) that in Windows, even the almighty Administrator is not privy to goings on in the SYSTEM level. I'm not familiar with the NT kernel though.

      But then the next two quotes directly contradict what he says. The spokeswoman says no backdoors are involved. But to get at encryption keys, you either need weak encryption (then why the need for online?), cooperation (we can still plead the 5th for now, so this won't go very far), or a backdoor.

      One of the following must be true:

      • They're all wrong and don't know wtf they're talking about.
      • MS caught with its pants down and backtracking to not give away their secrets (again they real
      --
      Billy Brown rides on. Yolanda Green bypasses Gary White.
    25. Re:If It's Possible... by Ikester8 · · Score: 1

      True, but we're looking at Microsoft handing out this technology almost willy-nilly to people who aren't necessarily computer experts. The cops barely bother with warrants these days, and now, technical incompetency isn't going to stop them either.

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
  17. This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...it's just one more nail in the coffin of being "allowed" to use OSS. After all, if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear, and only criminals would use OSS that would allow them to evade government snooping.

    I'm sure some lobbyist is sitting with a Congressional staffer right now, explaining how requiring Windows on every computer is essential to the War on Terrorism.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by KiltedKnight · · Score: 1

      Considering that one interpretation of the MS Windows EULA basically says that while you own the computer, you don't really own the computer... All you need is some creative lawyer to use that interpretation to say, "Well, you don't really own the box. It's just on loan to you from Microsoft. This device allows Microsoft to examine their property."

      --
      OCO is Loco
    2. Re:This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you do own the hardware. You also own yoru data on it. The OS is another matter. But by trying to imply your computer isn't yours at all is FUD.

    3. Re:This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I would have agreed to you in the past, but in Soviet Amerika, your corporate overlords welcome you.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by qbast · · Score: 1

      Windows EULA can cover only Windows. My box (and all its physical parts like hard disk) is mine alone. You want to examine your property? Fine, but do it without touching *my* property.

    5. Re:This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      After all, if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear

      You are making the incredibly naive assumption that the Congresscritters who would vote for legislation like that don't have anything to hide.

      I think it is telling that the Republican Party uses their "Party e-mail accounts" instead of their government accounts. By promising to make it impossible to truly secure a system, Microsoft could be construed as a threat to the policy wonks who live in their Ivory Towers on Capitol Hill -- or at least the ones that do things that are corrupt (which I would argue is 40-60%).

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    6. Re:This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      No no no... They own the *Operating System*. If they owned the BOX, they would have the RECEIPT.

      *I* have the receipts, as *I* built the box.

      The first time any Microsoft solicitor got that statement through a court, Microsoft share prices would drop to $0 as companies worldwide killed off volume license agreements, maintenance contracts, support contracts, and severed all ties with any Microsoft supplier or affiliate.

      I may be a little utopian here, but try getting the MoD to give up all their computer hardware running Windows, or the NSA. I bet Microsoft doesn't own THOSE computers.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, Congress routinely exempts itself from legislation the rest of us have to deal with.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    8. Re:This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      That kind of legislation probably wouldn't go over well with the NSA, the FBI, or the DoD, all of whom use Unix extensively.

    9. Re:This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, of course, the GOVERNMENT can use what it wants...

      I'm being a little facetious here regarding making Windows a legal requirement, but you know Microsoft is thinking about it.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    10. Re:This is very smart on Microsoft's part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solution? Easy-Peasy. Just found the 'First Fundamentalist Church of OSS', send a regular trickle of contributions to your favorite local GOP Fascist, and your OSS usage will become sancrosanct religious practice....

  18. How is this different? by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

    In the past, if I wanted to get information from another Windows machine, all I had to do was stick it in my Windows machine, log in as Administrator on my machine and change the permissions on the old hard drive. Then I could access all of the information, and bypass the Windows security from the other machine. The only thing I couldn't do is access some of the information that is actually stored in data files (such as IE's cache), even though it looks like a regular directory when ran within it's own windows installation. This is not new stuff.

    1. Re:How is this different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing I couldn't do is access some of the information that is actually stored in data files (such as IE's cache)

      To reveal the cache directories (if that's what you mean), you just edit and neuter index.dat and paste the neutered file in each one (Google it). You can do it on the host drive - no need for a different boot.

  19. Oh, I've heard of this. by xactuary · · Score: 1

    It's going to be called Windows 7, right?

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
  20. Maybe I'm weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But this sounds okay to me. The police won't be using it without a warrant, as then they couldn't use any evidence they found against you in court. At least that's how the courts are supposed to work. If they are already allowed to look through your house for evidence, why not the computer? And if you're a smart criminal, you're not going to trust Windows security. If you're a dumb criminal, you deserve to get busted.

    I can see potential for abuse, but police can abuse the handguns, handcuffs, flashlights, etc. they carry as well.

    Now, such a device getting away from the police... That could be a problem.

    1. Re:Maybe I'm weird... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      The police won't be using it without a warrant

      If only that were true! If they'll open my garage door and have a look around without a warrant (on Memorial Day, when we salute those who died defending the Constitution and its 4th amendment), what makes you think they won't open your computer and have a look around without a warrant?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  21. Physical access equals ownage under any OS by Mashiara · · Score: 3, Insightful

    unless the hardware itself is secured and tamper-resistant enough (ie cost of successfull tampering is higher than value of data).

    This has always been true.

    1. Re:Physical access equals ownage under any OS by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Physical access equals ownage under any OS

      Dude. Even Windows (Vista) supports encrypting your disk these days. Assuming it was turned off when seized, that does not mean your data has been compromised or is realistically recoverable, especially by your average cop shop.

    2. Re:Physical access equals ownage under any OS by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that if your "average cop shop" as you put it finds out they can't read the files they'll send it either to their state lab or to some other higher agency that has expert knowledge in the subject of computer forensics. If they have reason to suspect your hard drive has data they want they'll try to get it.

      Side note: I recently built a new rig for gaming and have no issues with Vista. In fact I kinda like it. Not to say I still don't use Linux at work and at home also. Being a long time /. reader can't say I'm surprised. my $0.02

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    3. Re:Physical access equals ownage under any OS by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I believe the point is that this key will allow access to data enctypted by the OS, not third party apps. Otherwise it's no better than a LiveCD.

      N.B. SPECULATION.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:Physical access equals ownage under any OS by GanjaManja · · Score: 1

      at worst you put the hard drive in question into another computer as a second drive, and proceed to decrypt/crack it.

    5. Re:Physical access equals ownage under any OS by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that if your "average cop shop" as you put it finds out they can't read the files they'll send it either to their state lab or to some other higher agency that has expert knowledge in the subject of computer forensics. If they have reason to suspect your hard drive has data they want they'll try to get it.

      Sure they will, but assuming you picked a strong password, they may not be able to because it would take too much computing power to break the encryption. My point was physical access != ownage, even with stock systems using only the built in tools.

      Side note: I recently built a new rig for gaming and have no issues with Vista. In fact I kinda like it.

      Vista has some interesting new features as well as some anti-features. For the most part, it seems okay, but as of my last test still had too many issues with old software (including 1 show stopper for my work) and it seemed prudent to wait for the ecosystem to stabilize. I, also, don't see its lack of functionality preventing it from taking over from XP in the next 5 years, although the bad mainstream press and lack of benefits for enterprise customers may slow it down.

    6. Re:Physical access equals ownage under any OS by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      It's a big assumption to assume that your computer is turned off when seized. It's a bigger assumption that your password or encryption key hasn't been paged out to virtual memory and then never cleared, and that you haven't reused your password for a less-secure purpose.

    7. Re:Physical access equals ownage under any OS by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      It's a big assumption to assume that your computer is turned off when seized.

      It won't necessarily be, however it does present a situation that falsifies the assertion I was addressing. Physical access does not necessarily mean access to the data.

      It's a bigger assumption that your password or encryption key hasn't been paged out to virtual memory and then never cleared...

      Those were issues with early versions of hard disk encryption built into OS's, but has been addressed by Filevault (OS X), Bitlocker (Vista), and TrueCrypt (Linux). Basically, unless the machine is in hibernate mode, or was shut down less than 5 minutes ago, no that isn't really a concern.

      ...and that you haven't reused your password for a less-secure purpose.

      No. That isn't an assumption for me.

      Anyways, you seem to be missing the point. The OP said if you have physical access, then you have access to the data anyway. That is not necessarily true, even when not including any third-party security features.

    8. Re:Physical access equals ownage under any OS by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      It's true when discussing the added abilities of this Microsoft tool, though -- it doesn't give access to anything that a person with physical access to your machine didn't already have access to.

    9. Re:Physical access equals ownage under any OS by rajkiran_g · · Score: 1

      Physical access equals ownage under any OS

      But not without a reboot. However, from the article and the paper, it is implied that the device is intended to be used in a live scenario. No powering off, no disconnection from the network. I doubt such a thing is possible in Linux.

  22. i wish i had known about this during last months pwn to own contest.

    Then i'd be running ubuntu on my cracked and pwned vista machine right now, instead of runnung ubuntu on my purchased and formatted vista machine.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  23. Box 0wned by person with physical access! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    News at 11!

  24. Required? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

    I wonder if some jurisdictions will begin requiring this, in the sense that if someone is using a system that does not support easily bypassing security that will be enough for 'probable grounds'.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    1. Re:Required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think so. Because it would open a huge security hole and probably outlaw most operating systems in existance (except, *cough*, Windows), causing lots of protests and backlash.

      Besides, that kind of requirement opens a huge security hole and would mean that noone has right to a privacy.

    2. Re:Required? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      The gov own laptops are locked down to trun off usb / ext / cdrom boot and other people do that as well.

      Also forcing people to windows will not work as there will be big time back lash from the mac and Linux uses it may also force ms to make windows free.

    3. Re:Required? by qbast · · Score: 1

      Don't think so. Because it would open a huge security hole and probably outlaw most operating systems in existance (except, *cough*, Windows), causing lots of protests and backlash. I don't think Apple will have any trouble with adding this 'feature', so who will be left to protest? Bunch of angry nerds? Nobody (that actually matters) cares.

      Besides, that kind of requirement opens a huge security hole and would mean that noone has right to a privacy. And this is surprising how?
    4. Re:Required? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Don't think so. Because it would open a huge security hole and probably outlaw most operating systems in existance (except, *cough*, Windows), Exactly. Both the government and their bedbuddy MS would love it. Who else needs to?

      causing lots of protests and backlash By whom? People who don't care today about Viruses, Infections, Spyware, Trojans, Adware? (nice acronym, by the way) Who is going to teach them better? You and me? Have you tried yet, and that's without the government bit.

      Besides, that kind of requirement opens a huge security hole and would mean that noone has right to a privacy. Oh, right, I forgot, that's been a reason to scrap similar plans in the past.
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    5. Re:Required? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Also forcing people to windows will not work as there will be big time back lash from the mac and Linux uses All 3% of them?
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  25. Simple Protection by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

    Disable Autorun, that way the automated tool can't start. ;)

    And if the USB software interacts with the computer while the OS is running, how can that be considered untainted evidence? AFAIK computer forensics rely on having snapshots of the machine with no possible interference from the OS and running programs.

    Jonah HEX

    1. Re:Simple Protection by Applekid · · Score: 1

      AFAIK computer forensics rely on having snapshots of the machine with no possible interference from the OS and running programs. This is a war on terror / pedophiles / drugs / little chocolate donuts! How dare you use semantics to cloud our investigations to protect the people / children / teens / diabetics.
      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:Simple Protection by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      If there was a War on Little Chocolate Donuts, the police would strike.

    3. Re:Simple Protection by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      No, they would work double shifts! of course there would be a lot of cases of evidence going missing...

  26. Not new by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone can boot from a Knoppix live CD and mount NTFS drives in Linux and poke around. NTFS security is not applied under Linux so you can have a look at anything you want. I don't see how this is a big deal.

    The only thing that might be a problem is browsing the registry, but I wonder if wine's regedit can load native Windows registry hives. If so, then all Microsoft has done is taken existing Linux functionality and made it user friendly for the police.

    Speaking of which, anyone wanna place bets as to how long it takes for this tool to spread across p2p and torrent sites?

    1. Re:Not new by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Anyone can boot from a Knoppix live CD and mount NTFS drives in Linux and poke around. NTFS security is not applied under Linux so you can have a look at anything you want. I don't see how this is a big deal.

      The only thing that might be a problem is browsing the registry, but I wonder if wine's regedit can load native Windows registry hives. If so, then all Microsoft has done is taken existing Linux functionality and made it user friendly for the police.

      Speaking of which, anyone wanna place bets as to how long it takes for this tool to spread across p2p and torrent sites?


      Or, given that a number of new computers have FireWire ports, you can easily break in via FireWire!

      http://storm.net.nz/projects/16

      This can also be used to break into MacOS X and Linux machines as well via the FireWire bus. Of course, it does require physical access to the machine, but you can do this, and get in while the machine is still on without rebooting it.

      It's basically a very similar way to how one would debug operating systems via FireWire. Except one's intent is more malicious. (You can use FireWire to do post-mortem debugging since the controller runs independently of the OS).
    2. Re:Not new by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      The only thing that might be a problem is browsing the registry, but I wonder if wine's regedit can load native Windows registry hives. If so, then all Microsoft has done is taken existing Linux functionality and made it user friendly for the police.

      There are windows utilities that let you load the hives from a boot CD. I used it to clean infections from computers from a BartPE CD.

      Infact the more I think about it the tool I think came from the same people who made all those nifty diagnostics tools like a thread process and network port monitoring software. Ironicly the same group that Microsoft bought out not too long ago.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    3. Re:Not new by ribuck · · Score: 1

      Anyone can boot from a Knoppix live CD and mount NTFS drives in Linux and poke around. NTFS security is not applied under Linux so you can have a look at anything you want.

      Wouldn't it be funny if Microsoft's USB device was actually a Knoppix live distro?

    4. Re:Not new by ArcadeX · · Score: 1

      It already has. It's called ERD Commander, and M$ bought the company that put it out a while back.

      --
      An I.T. motto in the hands of an idiot is a dangerous thing...
    5. Re:Not new by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      I bet this is even less of a deal than that.

      I'll bet you a nickle that it's just a bootable usb device with a batch file that copies the registry, logs, user profile, + a few other things onto the drive for later perusal.

      Really, if they were serious about pwnzoring your machine they'd just take it from you. It's not like they have to 'hack' your machine. They're the police. They own your machine by... picking it up and taking it. OWNED!

      This is more of a "We've got probable cause to serch the premisis... and plug this doojie into your computer." An old machine that can't boot USB and has Autorun turned off probably defeats it, because this isn't for serious investigations.

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    6. Re:Not new by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      As an addendum, it seems this COFEE is a USB thumb drive with software which allows you to poke around in Windows while Windows is running. This is a bit more significant since booting into another OS means the first OS' security restrictions can't apply (unless you used encryption). Even in Windows I can access my Linux personal files without a password with an efs2 driver.

      Pulling passwords from within Windows is a bit of a different matter, and I would see it as a security risk. Furthermore full drive encryption is totally bypassed with this, and if you have a Truecrypt drive mounted it would be scanned too.

      Of course this only makes it more likely the tool will be abused when it is inevitably leaked.

      I guess the lesson is if you have things you wouldn't want the police to see, even if you have encryption in place, whenever someone knocks on your door turn your PC off (and optionally, back on) before answering it. And/or use Linux.

    7. Re:Not new by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Is this possible even if there are no FireWire drivers running in the Linux kernel? (I didn't bother compiling in FireWire drivers because I have no FireWire devices.)

    8. Re:Not new by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The trouble is you can use firewire to plant evidence too.

      I don't think it's just firewire. There's that server management stuff too. And USB exploits - which might be what the microsoft stuff is about (can't be bothered to RTFA).

      Anyway, seems Macs allow you to turn the firewire dma stuff off, not sure if that's applicable to the Intel Macs.

      Back to the "plant evidence" thing - while the Microsoft/3rd party tool could do it in a "read only" way who's to say you won't end up with evidence tampering with some other tool.

      Someone could sneak in one day, plant illegal material (e.g. child porn, terrorist stuff) on your encrypted drive using similar tech, then a different bunch of people come the next day, kick down your door, and voila you are found to have illegal material.

      --
    9. Re:Not new by wraithguard01 · · Score: 1

      I give it a month, max. However, any halfway decent security guru knows that without some sort of (non-windows) encryption scheme, such as a True Crypt volume or whatnot is generally very easy to break into without these tools from Microsoft. All they are doing is allowing Mr. Joe Blow cop to look through your computer as soon as they bust into your house with a search warrant. If they had reason to suspect you were a REAL terrorist, or a child pornographer ring leader, then it would be the FBI knocking on your door, and they don't need that anyways. No, all the concerns raised here, I'm not so much worried about. Only thing I'm worried about is the fact that customs can search your laptop for no reason. That's a violation of privacy, IMO. If you are a suspected terrorist, sure, sure, they should be able to search your computer, and tools to make that process easier are great. But how much you wanna bet these tools are going to stay exclusively in law enforcment (or even government agencies)?

    10. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If so, then all Microsoft has done is taken existing Linux functionality and made it user friendly for the police.
      You think they were able to dumb it down that much?
    11. Re:Not new by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      I don't bother wasting my time with Linux Live CDs when I need to deal with Windows boxes.

      Just roll yourself a BartPE disk, better for dealing with Windows since its designed for it.

      Easy enough to do registry editing or access drives etc, and even a way to easily change passwords or run as the SYSTEM account (root for Windows) with Dreampack.

    12. Re:Not new by hacker · · Score: 1

      Really, if they were serious about pwnzoring your machine they'd just take it from you. It's not like they have to 'hack' your machine. They're the police. They own your machine by... picking it up and taking it. OWNED!

      You must be new to this.

      First step in Search & Seizure of a suspect's assets is to DOCUMENT DOCUMENT DOCUMENT! This means you photograph the back of the computer, the front, the wiring, etc. You track where that wiring goes, you follow it to the wall outlet (and possibly further).

      You NEVER just blindly shut down a machine and take it with you. It is absolutely critical that you try to access the RUNNING machine to gain access to the data as much as you can, without modifying anything (like the Firewire bulk copy hack discovered recently).

      Once you shut down the machine, you may no longer be able to access things like mounted Truecrypt volumes, swap, RAM, lists of running programs or other data regions of the drive. If the suspect knows you're coming, they may have already "prepared" their system for just such a case... (shred -99 on shutdown?)

      I know that if my machine was shut down, it would take more than 50+ years of brute-force cracking with several hundred thousand high-end computers to get into my encrypted volumes... assuming they know the exact bit-for-bit layout of my LVM and drive partitioning.

      If my machine is booted and running, and someone figures a way to bypass my login password... they could gain access to everything that I have mounted and available.

    13. Re:Not new by izelrenevato · · Score: 1

      The kids I let use my system often use all sorts of features and don't know it. Then they wonder how I manage to "fix" things like finding forgotten passwords and the like. Or how I can get data off their Win2K or Win XP by using KNOPPIX and not knowing their passwords. I try to explain and it and the interesting thing is the 13 year old gets but her 18 year old sister doesn't. Now they wish that KNOPPIX was a distro and not a live CD. Have Fun, Sends Steve

  27. Do not pass "go", do not collect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Where do you want to go today?"
    Jail?

  28. It seems... by poormanjoe · · Score: 0

    that all the "device" does is speed up what the police were already able to do. Sounds like a PR stunt.

    --
    I want to be retired when I grow up.
  29. African computer crime units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jean-Michel Louboutin, Interpol's executive director of police services, said only 10 of 50 African countries have dedicated cybercrime investigative units.


    Oh the humanity.. thinking that the police forces of these African countries are more concerned with murder and rape!

    Priorities, people!
  30. Maybe not so bad... by spasticfantastic · · Score: 1

    Ok - in principle I think this is a bad thing but.. We already know that you're guilty until proven innocent now - anything that can speed up the time from accusation to aquital for innocent suspects is a good thing. Also this development will hopefully put the brakes on the UK gov's plans for increasing the time you can be be held without charge to 42 days - their excuse was that it takes a long time to obtain computer evidence. Of course it won't take long for this device to be found on the black market - another reason to move away from Windows, or is the plan to brand anyone who uses a non-windows OS as a possible criminal?

    1. Re:Maybe not so bad... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Well, Microsoft and SCO have already tried their damnedest to make every Linux user an actual criminal for using MS and SCO patents and copyrighted code without permission. Not that they've been able to prove anything, nor that SCO actually ended up owning any patents or the code in question at all.

  31. Offline NT password and registry editor? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    I've had the following tool in my collection for a long time: http://home.eunet.no/pnordahl/ntpasswd/bootdisk.html

    It's quite easy, boot up the computer from that disk and you can reset the passwords in a few minutes. Linux-based too for that matter.

    FTFA:
    The device contains 150 commands that can dramatically cut the time it takes to gather digital evidence, which is becoming more important in real-world crime, as well as cybercrime. It can decrypt passwords and analyze a computer's Internet activity, as well as data stored in the computer. It also eliminates the need to seize a computer itself, which typically involves disconnecting from a network, turning off the power and potentially losing data. Instead, the investigator can scan for evidence on site.

    Apparently just some tools-on-a-disk. If it can bypass the encrypted file systems and other secure stuff, then there is a problem and the so-called "NSA-key" is not just myth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSAKEY).

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Offline NT password and registry editor? by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 1

      If it can bypass the encrypted file systems Probably uses rainbow tables to crack the passwords like ophcrack -- user could then decrypt the EFS content without any backdoor, or just log in as the user and let Windows do the work.
    2. Re:Offline NT password and registry editor? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Windows doesn't HAVE an encrypted file system...This is talking about breaking the encryption on Windows passwords which is a lot easier.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:Offline NT password and registry editor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does. It's called EFS, which, not surpisingly, stands for Encrypting File System. It uses a private cert tied to your username.

    4. Re:Offline NT password and registry editor? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Windows doesn't HAVE an encrypted file system...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encrypting_File_System

      Its actually had it since windows 2000 in their non-home products. It uses public key encryption, and by all accounts is a perfectly good implementation. There is a conspiracy theory that there is an NSA backdoor, but its little more than an unsubstantiated rumor.

      This is talking about breaking the encryption on Windows passwords which is a lot easier.

      The weakness of EFS is indeed the Windows passwords itself, which are often "a lot easier" to break. However, there are several 'modes' that the windows passwords can be stored in and only the more basic (and default) modes are easy, and a good password combined with the appropriate security policies results in a respectably safe encryption solution. (e.g. no linux live CD tools that I'm aware of has -ever- been able to recover or reset a password and get the encrypted files back.)

      And I seriously doubt the new ms usb tool can either. Unless the NSA backdoor really existed... but even then I doubt they'd let joe-law-enforcement have access to it and tip their hand that it really existed. (in the unlikely event that it actually did exist).

  32. What can it really do? by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

    I really doubt that it can decrypt your passwords, other than a brute force attack. Maybe the trivial passwords on word 2003 files and the like.

    Anything else you can easily do when you have physical access to the computer.

    1. Re:What can it really do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really doubt that it can decrypt your passwords, other than a brute force attack. Maybe the trivial passwords on word 2003 files and the like.

      Depends what you mean by decrypt passwords.

      All sorts of passwords are remembered by applications (like internet explorer, outlook, etc). Microsoft stores these in a restricted part of the user profile in an area called "Protected Storage", where they are not easily accessible, even to the user. With the right tools, these passwords can be retrieved.

      Windows passwords are easily cracked if the Lan Manager weak password is stored (by default, they are stored, for backwards compatibility). You can disable this by setting NoLMHash in the registry under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa and changing your password. Otherwise you have to brute-force the password, which will take a very long time. You might get lucky with a dictionary attack.

      Microsoft actually did an ok job with the Office passwords. They are not crackable (or, no one has reported a real crack). They can be brute-forced in a reasonable time because the keyspace is small. There are companies which will do this for a fee. My company had to do this once when an employee forgot the password on some .doc files.

    2. Re:What can it really do? by TheP4st · · Score: 1
      Emmm... a bit more than that. The below quote done with googlle translate isn't perfect but infinitely better than mine would have been. ;-)

      IMIS words, WFT and COFEE software tools can help the computer forensics officer at the scene to collect information as follows: 1. Entities memory data (DD support read Physical Memory). 2. Disk file the MAC (Modify, Access, Create) time. 3. Computer systems of basic information (such as CPU, boot time, accounts, audit, etc.). 4. Processing information (DLL, Handle, etc.). 5. System Services (System Services) category. 6. Network connection port and the status of the information (Network Info). 7. The list included drivers (Drivers). 8. Login system of user information (Login). 9. System Event Log (Event Log). 10. Automatically activate the (Auto Runs). 11. IE history (IE History). 12. Protected system to store data (Protected Storage). Source: http://blog.pixnet.net/jaychou0702/post/12092071
      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
  33. TFA very light on details by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

    locally stored passwords for websites have been crackable for a while now, and in Windows Server has been disabled by default for this reason.

    User login passwords for Windows itself is something else and you can't "just decrypt" them.

    Apart from that, it just sounds like MS have provided a bunch of analysis tools.

    Is this really news or am I missing something here?

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
    1. Re:TFA very light on details by Teran9 · · Score: 1

      Windows passwords are simple to break if you have physical access.

    2. Re:TFA very light on details by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

      Please, i'd love to see some evidence you can just open a Windows user account password like a can of soda. Is that what you're saying right?

      --
      throw new NoSignatureException();
    3. Re:TFA very light on details by the_B0fh · · Score: 1
    4. Re:TFA very light on details by Riachu_11 · · Score: 1

      Assuming LanMan hashing hasn't been disabled in favor of NTLanMan and that the password is 14 characters or less, it is that simple. It'll take a few hours with a complete set of rainbow tables, or L0phtCrack can do a alphanumeric password in a day or two.

    5. Re:TFA very light on details by Alarindris · · Score: 1

      I wish I had a link. Years ago I downloaded a floppy that will give you an XP admin's password instantly. No joke, still have it.

    6. Re:TFA very light on details by Mr.+Vage · · Score: 1

      User login passwords for Windows itself is something else and you can't "just decrypt" them.

      Actually it's easier than you think: http://ophcrack.sourceforge.net/

  34. Customs by Hemogoblin · · Score: 1

    Unless there's a huge public backlash before then, I predict that Customs will roll these out to every major airport within the year.

    1. Re:Customs by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Not just Customs, but the TSA will have them too. Everyone flying into the country, according to the Ninth Circuit, is subject to a search of their laptops.

    2. Re:Customs by Ioldanach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unless there's a huge public backlash before then, I predict that Customs will roll these out to every major airport within the year.
      I hope so, because then the first slashdotter that has to go through customs can have his laptop automatically dd the entire contents of whatever usb drive gets attached to it, before they even realize it can't figure out what his laptop is running.
    3. Re:Customs by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      What if one disables mounting of usb devices? And has it disabled in the kernel (no module). Wouldn't one have to reboot to enable it?

  35. I recall a quote from a Canadian gentleman... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

    ...who was a computer forensics expert/consultant.

    He said that if one is going to use one's computer as an aid to their criminal career, use a Mac. The RCMP and all the rest were completely ignorant when it came to the Mac OS as well as everything else not Windows.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    1. Re:I recall a quote from a Canadian gentleman... by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Won't work in the USA. If you are using a non-Windows machine, they'll just assume that you *are* a terrorist.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    2. Re:I recall a quote from a Canadian gentleman... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      He said that if one is going to use one's computer as an aid to their criminal career, use a Mac. The RCMP and all the rest were completely ignorant when it came to the Mac OS as well as everything else not Windows.

      This is interesting. An FBI guy told me they shipped all the Macs they seized to the RCMP, who had staff experienced in analyzing them, whereas the FBI did not.

    3. Re:I recall a quote from a Canadian gentleman... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      And I remember an article about an FBI guy doing a security seminar who booted up a Powerbook and said he preferred using Macs on unsecured net connections.

      I'm sure both the RCMP and FBI are quite capable of having any OS analyzed. It is possible it might be more cost effective for them to cooperate on it though.

    4. Re:I recall a quote from a Canadian gentleman... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      I did say it was "some years ago".

      Of course, it would be very unpatriotic of me to suggest that the FBI might be lying.

      Again.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  36. Well, why am I not surprised? by flajann · · Score: 1
    Well, golly. This of course means there is *no* security on Windows computers. It's only a matter of time that this backdoor is cracked and becomes generally available to everyone.

    The only thing I use Windows for is to run TurboTax and games. And I'm wondering about the TurboTax even.

    But all hope is not lost -- running Windows on a hypervisor would be a bit more secure -- at least you can restart with the same snapshot, eliminating any attempts to embed a rootkit or snooping ware.

    But really, with Linux these days, who needs Windows?

    1. Re:Well, why am I not surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But all hope is not lost -- running Windows on a hypervisor would be a bit more secure -- at least you can restart with the same snapshot, eliminating any attempts to embed a rootkit or snooping ware.

      I've been running Windows using hardware-virtualization, under a Xen hypervisor. Currently I went the VMWare route that said (using the free [as in costing $0] 'vmplayer'). I keep a great many images/snapshots. For example now in a few days it's going to be the time to dig out an old 'pure Windows XP' install, plain fresh... To install the latest service pack (SP3). Of course as soon as SP3 shall be installed I'll make a new image/snapshot. Killing a whole system instantly is as simple as 'kill -9' (VMWare) or 'xm destroy ...' (Xen). Re-installing from an old snapshot takes less than one minute (depending on the size of your image). You can't beat that :)

    2. Re:Well, why am I not surprised? by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      People who are to arrogant and "busy" to learn new operating systems.

  37. Scary - and unbelievable by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    This sounds too scary to be true - and if true, it won't be long for this to be reverse-engineered.

    Bypassing passwords/security: that sounds like a built-in back door. Not a security flaw: "this bug is a feature". And those back doors if confirmed to exist will be found soon.

    The most unbelievable part is "decrypting passwords". Since when is the actual password stored, instead of a cryptographic hash of it? If decryption were possible, they are using a two-way encryption and a secret key is somewhere hidden in Windows. Every single copy of it. And that I can't believe, really. I call hoax. Still it won't make me use Windows anytime soon.

    1. Re:Scary - and unbelievable by jimicus · · Score: 1

      What OS you run won't make the remotest bit of difference.

      It really wouldn't be hard to cook up a Linux-based thumbdrive which automatically mounts more or less any filesystem in common use today, runs a combination of find and grep to weed out potentially interesting files, copy them onto an area of the thumbdrive and shut the system down when done.

      It probably wouldn't generate anything which would stand up to forensic questions in court, but it would give you a pretty good idea as to whether or not it's worth investigating someone further.

      In fact, I'd be astonished if something similar to this wasn't already on the market to law-enforcement agencies.

      Solution: Configure your PC to boot direct from the hard drive, disable all other boot devices and put a password on the BIOS. It won't protect you from law enforcement deciding that if you're going to make their life difficult you're hiding something, kick your door down and seize your PC, but frankly in those circumstances you need a lawyer, not someone on /. advising you how to secure things.

      (To be honest, I think it's more likely this was a convenient way of distributing a bunch of tools meant to be used in conjunction with a drive image taken through appropriate imaging tools rather than a fully-bootable forensics kit)

    2. Re:Scary - and unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two linux boot disks. One of them boots and asks you to set the administrator password. The other boots with a small set of rainbow tables and attempts to brute force all accounts.

      I doubt very much EFS encrypted volums are safe unless syskey is enabled with a bootup pass-phrase since these tools can dig up the necessary material (easily brute forceable passwords) to decrypt them.

      If syskey with a strong pass-phrase can be bypassed then MS deserves to be boycotted if not then all I can say is "Duh" it should be obvious to all that unsalted one-way hashes (NT OWF) can be easily reversed. Bigcrypt is much more difficult but thats not saying much.

    3. Re:Scary - and unbelievable by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      What would be great would be to find out it's Knoppix or Trinity running ntcrack and such with no source.

  38. TrueCrypt ! by unrealmp3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For local data privacy, I would use TrueCrypt, not Windows EFS. Use Full Disk Encryption on TrueCrypt, and their COFEE thumbdrive won't be of any help.

    1. Re:TrueCrypt ! by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      If you left your windows machine running (which is when you'd use this thumb drive according to the article) then the disk decryption is transparent to a Windows user and thus transparent to the forensics officer or the criminal who is using the device to gain access to your machine.

    2. Re:TrueCrypt ! by Dencrypt · · Score: 1

      ...and don't forget the excellent support for hidden containers. A really good alternative even if there are laws in your specific country that implies you to reveal passwords or face jailtime. You can't really give out passwords for something nobody can find ;)

  39. Really? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No unix using a non-encrypted file system is secure if you have physical access to the machine...Why would you assume it's any different with Windows?

    I'd just boot knoppix and mount the partition. There, I have access to all the files. That goes for windows AND unix/linux.

    If you really depend on the password for anything other than stopping casual or remote access, you're just fooling yourself.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Really? by Narpak · · Score: 1

      Ah these are facts I will not dispute. I just figured that an USB device that "can dramatically cut the time it takes to gather digital evidence," would aid those with malicious intent as much as the authorities (that always have your best interests in mind; honest!). ;)

    2. Re:Really? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Physical access is always a killer. Your only safeguard at that point is encryption.

      I can't think it would take all that long anyway. I reset the admin password on my windows laptop the other day, and it was fairly trivial.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:Really? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I'd just boot knoppix and mount the partition.

      Police over here in WA have a special distro designed for forensics.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    4. Re:Really? by malinha · · Score: 2, Informative

      well, just another job to truecrypt.

    5. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is trivial. I have done it. Thinking "It can't be THIS easy" I spent more time thinking "this can't be right" than doing it.

    6. Re:Really? by SnapShot · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be really funny / ironic if this "plug-in" device WAS just knoppix on a thumb drive.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    7. Re:Really? by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >I'd just boot knoppix and mount the partition.

      I would not be surprised if that turns out to be the "device" referred to.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    8. Re:Really? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No unix using a non-encrypted file system is secure if you have physical access to the machine...Why would you assume it's any different with Windows?

      I'd just boot knoppix and mount the partition. There, I have access to all the files. That goes for windows AND unix/linux.

      If you really depend on the password for anything other than stopping casual or remote access, you're just fooling yourself. I just bought a Mac laptop and one of the things I ran across while I was reading about it was the File Vault. According to the really really enthusiastic article I read about it, it'll encrypt all the data on my home folder based on my login password. In theory, it sounds like even if somebody mirrored the drive, they'd have trouble (assuming the password is good...) getting at my data. I just wanted to ask: From a practical point of view, does this offer me much more protection? Or is there still some braindead easy way (short of beating the password out of me :P) that data can be recovered? Supposing it does work as advertised, am I at risk for having a single point of failure? Is there a realistic possibility of a badly timed computer freeze causing me to lose it all?
      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:Really? by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      It seems that this usb stick was designed to bypass full disk crypto etc. It allows an investigator to pull as much important data as possible off of a running system before it is confiscated.

      http://www.forensicswiki.org/wiki/Incident_Response

      Its mention in that wiki entry makes it sound like nothing more than a graphical frontend for various other forensics tools.

      While it would be easy enough to write something like this for any operating system, it goes a bit beyond a knoppix disk.

    10. Re:Really? by piojo · · Score: 1

      I reset the admin password on my windows laptop the other day, and it was fairly trivial. I was under the impression that if you use tools to reset the admin password (without knowing the old one), that would not give you access to old encrypted files. From the summary, this seems different, like a real back door.

      I wonder what will happen when bad people get their hands on this technology?
      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    11. Re:Really? by qbast · · Score: 1

      Even simpler, without any boot cd or USB thingies. Just add 'init=/bin/bash' to kernel commandline in GRUB. Obvious defence is to protect boot loader with password or disallow editing but I don't think any consumer distro does it by default.

    12. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I use a booby-trapped case that sets off a small thermite charge over the hard drive in case of tampering.

      Doesn't everyone?

    13. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But this also means that microsoft may have some master key to decrypt filesystems, etc.

      Also, this is probably fully automated, like plugging in a flash drive. Just wait until a few of these get lost.....

    14. Re:Really? by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Define "bad people", please.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    15. Re:Really? by RMB2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ummm, did you RTFA? Microsoft is intentionally putting it right into the hands of the police. THEY already have it.

      --
      [/sarcasm]
    16. Re:Really? by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 2, Funny

      Government officials...

      --
      ~ Ron Fitzgerald
    17. Re:Really? by sporkme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Windows admin accounts can "take ownership" of folders and files through permissions dialogs, even encrypted files belonging to another admin account. Without Administrator access or a bootable OS, you can install a parallel OS on the machine or just mount the volume from another system, alter the permissions for folders at will, and access everything. We used this regularly to extract documents from a pooched MS OS when I worked as a bench tech--we used an unpatched WIN2K image and a USB IDE card.

      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/268019/en-us
      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308421/en-us

    18. Re:Really? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From what I understand, No. There are ways, but nothing this simple. Your home folder is actually one massive 128bit AES disk image. So to crackers it just looks like one big file. You could do what I do and keep stuff 'private' (Tax Returns, financial stuff) on an encrypted disk image and have the OS NOT remember the password. Plus if you forget the password you don't lose all your music and other petty stuff.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FileVault

      I was in an Apple store once when someone brought in their file vaulted laptop computer. They had 'forgotten' their password (Their actual story was that the OS changed the password on them). Apple Genius told them they were SOL. There are ways, but none of them are easy and most require something like cooling the RAM immediately after shutdown or catching the computer when it is sleeping.

    19. Re:Really? by Depili · · Score: 1

      Filevault uses 128 bit AES encryption and it should be safe, but as always with closed source crypto it's almost impossible to verify that there aren't any backdoors.

      But yes, the file vault protects your data against mirroring the hard drive / booting a different OS and other access without the encryption key (which is encrypted by your password)

    20. Re:Really? by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Bypass full disk encryption?
      You have no clue! That USB stick would only show an encrypted disk as a collection of random data.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    21. Re:Really? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Obviously you didn't read the article. The whole benefit of the device is that it can plug in to a machine and gather evidence without having to unplug the machine from the network or a power source (to move it). The article also specifically describes the device as a USB thumb drive.

      The device contains 150 commands that can dramatically cut the time it takes to gather digital evidence [...] It can decrypt passwords and analyze a computer's Internet activity, as well as data stored in the computer. I assume these 150 commands are specific to Windows' internal undocumented APIs that only Microsoft would be aware of.
    22. Re:Really? by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I saw a really good post that applies to this entire thread (including File Vault)

      If the NSA isn't freaking out about some kind of encryption trying to get it banned, it's because they can get into it.

      Also, the more secure you think your files are, the more likely you'll put stuff there that might interest them.

    23. Re:Really? by cloakable · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, Windows decides to show the device the unencrypted data? It isn't as if Windows is trying to protect your data in this case - it's presumably actively trying to help the device get your data. So I wouldn't trust the Windows encryption.

      --
      No tyrant thrives when every subject says no.
    24. Re:Really? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Define "bad people", please.

      Well, in the context of this discussion, that's easy: A "bad" person clearly means anyone who wants to read my files without my permission.

      (I could get all political and name various organizations, governments, corportations, etc. that qualify, but it's more fun to leave that as an exercise for the reader. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    25. Re:Really? by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    26. Re:Really? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      While true, if you have posession of the hardware you are toast, if your file system encryption ( and password ) is strong enough it should take them decades to break, not seconds.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    27. Re:Really? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Umm i dont agree that 'the police' are the right hands for such power.

      The government should not be trusted with such tools. The chance of abuse is far to great.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    28. Re:Really? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's own encryption services/products could have a backdoor that is used by the COFEE. Which would of course be a good reason not to trust Microsoft products (what if bad guys got the COFEE software?).

      If you use a third party tool and don't leave the password lying around on the computer, I agree that the USB stick would be worthless.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    29. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what you are forgetting is that windows has had disk encryprion for a long time, and that encryption is hinged to the windows account password. if your windows account password can be cracked then your encrypted disk suddenly becomes decrypted (something that is very very hard to do from a live disk). a better solution would be to use truecrypt to encrypt your drive. this way no matter who has access to your computer they will not be able to access your data.

    30. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean your mom.

    31. Re:Really? by Aquaseafoam · · Score: 1

      Make sure you line the bottom of your case with a extreme heat resistant ceramic, don't want to lose your whole house too.

      --
      09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0
    32. Re:Really? by davidkv · · Score: 1

      The article makes a point of this tool enabling online forensics, as opposed to having to reboot.
      Which of course makes it _a lot_ easier to read encrypted partitions too. As long as they're mounted.

      As far as I know there's no way you could do that with unix/linux.

    33. Re:Really? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      The whole point of encryption is that it cannot be easily bypassed. The only way to get past the encryption is to decrypt the encrypted information. Now obviously Microsoft may have included back door keys or other mechanisms as "safety valves" for law enforcement, but nobody who is serious about their cryptography is going to trust the Microsoft disk encryption services. The full disk encryption services provided by TrueCrypt (free and open source), for example, are NOT going to be easily defeated by any external technical analysis.

    34. Re:Really? by Alarindris · · Score: 1

      That and I've had a bootdisk that will give the admin password for any computer running XP. Had it for years.

    35. Re:Really? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      That may be true (who knows?). But if you do have something encrypted you have to ask yourself it is vital enough that they would willingly admit they have the keys to get it? Similar to cracking the Enigma code - the enemy not knowing you've cracked their code is important in itself.

      Not applicable to all situations, but cases where you would be prosecuted under the law it might save you from snooping. They wont hand out that technology to the police (probably).

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    36. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      btw i was not saying that all windows partitions are encrypted by default, but rather it is an option that you can choose e.g. bitlocker.

    37. Re:Really? by TheLink · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you have a mac laptop and firewire AND are worried about people getting at your data, then maybe you should also figure out a way to disable full firewire access to your computer.

      See: http://rentzsch.com/macosx/securingFirewire

      "Firewire provides direct memory access. So I can plug in my PowerBook into an Xserve, and arbitrarily read and write to all of the Xserve's RAM, sans any logical protection."

      "Paul claims enabling the Open Firmware password also automatically disables Firewire DMA, preventing tricks like Quinn's."

      Go figure :).

      As for your question. I'm not familiar with File Vault.

      But with all such tech, it's very dependent on the details. A lot of cases the encryption is done with a "secret", and your passphrase is used to unlock that secret. If the secret is destroyed and there are no copies, even if you have your passphrase you won't be able to access the data.

      With some tech, there is a way for you to create multiple keys with access to the data. So you use one key, and you store another key somewhere else safe, so if you screw up you can still go dig it out (if you can still get it ;) ). Naturally that also means someone else probably could get that...

      Another issue: if you or someone else ever makes a copy of the encrypted partition or container file, and stores it somewhere, then an attacker might be able to compare the two versions.

      Thus if the attacker can sneak in and make copies of your drives, you may have a problem. The attacker could do a "chosen plaintext attack" on you. For example the attacker could send you contrived spam emails, and compare the changes in the drive images.

      Now the other problem is backups, what do you do with backups. If you don't encrypt the backups then you have an obvious problem.

      If you make copies of the encrypted containers - see the above "chosen plaintext" thing.

      So you need to use backup software that does things correctly, and which can actually restore stuff ;).

      Crypto and security isn't easy to do right. You have to consider the costs and impact.

      --
    38. Re:Really? by iacp · · Score: 1

      The one thing that actually is bothersome (although not surprising) is the password decrypting part.

      -- Could you pass me the salt please?!

    39. Re:Really? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      IIRC, when you set up and configure Windows 2000, you can specify whether encrypted files will be recoverable by the administrator or not.

      I don't know if that's been changed in XP or Vista, and it's been long enough since I studied for the W2K Pro MCP that I could be confusing encrypted files with something else on 2K as well ;)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    40. Re:Really? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Anyone whose interests conflict with the best interests of me and my loved ones >:]

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    41. Re:Really? by makomk · · Score: 2, Informative

      The whole point of encryption is that it cannot be easily bypassed. The only way to get past the encryption is to decrypt the encrypted information. Now obviously Microsoft may have included back door keys or other mechanisms as "safety valves" for law enforcement, but nobody who is serious about their cryptography is going to trust the Microsoft disk encryption services. The full disk encryption services provided by TrueCrypt [truecrypt.org] (free and open source), for example, are NOT going to be easily defeated by any external technical analysis. The whole point of this is that they can use it as a tool to analyze live systems which still have the encryption key in memory from when the user opened the encrypted volume. Using Truecrypt or other third-party encryption software won't protect you - if the encrypted volume was open when the police got to you, the data can be extracted no matter what you were using.

      Presumably, this has backdoors to bypass things like the Windows screen locker (which would otherwise be a major obstacle to working with live systems) built in.
    42. Re:Really? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Even if you protect the boot loader with a password, you can still break into the system by using a boot floppy or CD if you can get into the BIOS.

      At a place where I used to work, I had a Slackware desktop where I left Lilo unprotected by a password, just in case one of the other admins needed access for some reason. I came to work one Saturday morning, and found that my prompt had been changed to "hacked by RackGnome" (an inside joke there). This told me that 1) one of my coworkers had hacked my box, 2) they didn't care if I knew, and 3) therefore, it was a practical joke, and not due to anything work-related. I promptly rebuilt my box (since I didn't know what else they had done -- there were a lot of very creative people there...), reinstalled Lilo with password protection, edited my BIOS to remove the ability to boot from CD or floppy then password protected my BIOS. This closed all of the security holes I knew about, and my desktop was never hacked again (well, AFAIK anyway). Unfortunately, if someone had wanted in bad enough, they could have completely cleared and reset the BIOS, but doing that was a pain. I know, because I had to do it later, when I forgot the BIOS password... :(

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    43. Re:Really? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      No, that's the whole point!

      You set of the thermite charge, ignite your desktop, which then ignites the whole room. The door locks automatically when the thermite charge goes off, and therefore the snoop who tried to get into your computer never hacks another computer again.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    44. Re:Really? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's own encryption services/products could have a backdoor that is used by the COFEE. Which would of course be a good reason not to trust Microsoft products (what if bad guys got the COFEE software?).

      You mean when the bad guys get hold of the tools. Which in the case of corrupt police isn't likely to be very long at all.

    45. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, WA is probably a poor choice of abbreviation. Here in the States it refers to Washington State - and is used fairly often, moreso than the other two-letter state abbreviations, to avoid confusion with Washington DC.

    46. Re:Really? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      NTFS supports per-file encryption. If this device bypasses the encryption (as I recall, the key is stored associated with the user's password, and so if you crack the password DB you can get at encrypted files on an NTFS partition) then it is a security hole. If it doesn't then it's a non-story since a Windows CD has the same ability (boot to the recovery console).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    47. Re:Really? by clodney · · Score: 1

      I believe you have that backwards. IIRC, in Win2k, the administrator always had a backup encryption key, so the owner of the file or the administrator could read it.

      In XP and Vista they changed that, and made it possible to not have a backup key at all. In that case the admin could not decrypt other users files.

      In either case, I am fairly sure that if you change the admin password from outside of Windows (i.e. by booting from something else) that any encrypted data is unreadable.

      This article has more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encrypting_File_System

    48. Re:Really? by prennix · · Score: 1

      such power is already in the hands of anyone with a clue - this is a tool for the clueless. It seems they invented it especially for cops.

    49. Re:Really? by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The gorey details here are that the key to the filevault is a random number, and THAT is encrypted separately in the header using two different keys - the user's hashed password, and the filevault master. So if you know the master password, OR the user password, you can decrypt the actual image key and can get in. And changing the user password does not require reencoding all the image data, you just reencode the key in the header using the new password

      There is no other back door. The only possible hack is if they have auto login turned on, which basically indicates they are a retard. Technically it's possible to recover the login password once booted and auto logged in, though I have yet to see anyone figure it out, and I do look periodically. But at that point the HD is mounted anyway so all your data is there for copying to ext HD. Just no access to passwords in the keychain, (as in to recover, but you can still use them since the keychain is probably unlocked) but as above that is technically possible but not seen it done yet.

      If auto login is not on, they are not logged in, you don't know the password, and you don't know the master password, nobody can help you. Not the Apple store, not Steve, it doesn't matter who you are.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    50. Re:Really? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      And steganography.

      Yeah - all those goatse pics?
      They contain hidden messages.

      Maybe you should bust out your hex viewer and look for ascii characters encoded in the least significant bits of each subpixel.

      Maybe you should zoom in real close on that bit of poo on the butt plug.

    51. Re:Really? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Unless they use the rubber hose decryption tool, that is.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    52. Re:Really? by SiChemist · · Score: 1

      If the article is correct, then the device can decrypt the password. This makes undetected intrusion possible. Joe user would probably notice if you used ntpasswd or any of the other methods to change his password and obtain access. If you have access with the original password, you could check periodically and see if anything incriminating/useful appears on the system without the user noticing.

    53. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, TrueCrypt has an option to automatically unmount the disk if it's inactive for a given time. If the police bust down the door while you're working on your encrypted drive, you may just be screwed; perhaps TrueCrypt should have a quick-unmount-all hot key.

    54. Re:Really? by megaditto · · Score: 2, Informative

      One could always brute-force the password. Pre-10.3, DES brute-forcing would take about a month on your desktop computer. Since then they changed it to blowfish or something similar, so it would take longer.

      Certainly, NSA or some random botnet master would be able to recover your password in minutes if they needed to.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    55. Re:Really? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      If the whole disk encryption feature is employed then the disk is never written unencrypted, the writes are encrypted and reads are always decrypted on the fly. It is equivalent to running on a virtual disk. There is a special boot loader installed on the boot partition which takes as input the key as the very first step in the boot process and after that Windows runs as if the boot partition was a virtual disk and there are never any unencrypted writes to the disk (including swap file) because the entire partition is encrypted and mounted as a virtual disk. The only possibility is to recover the key from the RAM, which looses all contents once the power is cut (I am not an expert on volatile memory, but I suspect that this is very difficult or impossible to do reliably once the power is cut). A machine configured in this manner can be hard shutdown by cutting the power (an action requiring a couple of seconds or less, especially with a conveniently mounted kill switch) and the encrypted state is always preserved.

    56. Re:Really? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      you are 100% correct. i'm a windows hater but still admit; if someone has physical access to your computer your fscked regardless of the os.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    57. Re:Really? by Poohsticks · · Score: 1

      Not to downplay the joke, but I guarantee it's based on WinPE.

      --
      "The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been wide
    58. Re:Really? by eihab · · Score: 1

      I assume these 150 commands are specific to Windows' internal undocumented APIs that only Microsoft would be aware of. I'm thinking they're more along the lines of:

      cmd
      cd \
      dir /s > e:\Files_List.txt*
      copy %Application Data%..IE..History..cache...
      etc.

      *(dir /s = ls -R)
      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
    59. Re:Really? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      And by "dramatically cut the time it takes" they mean "it's a batch file so someone doesn't have to type it in by hand"... fun.

    60. Re:Really? by mrv20 · · Score: 2, Funny

      or catching the computer when it is sleeping That conjures up the wonderful image of a 'Genius' trying to sneak up on a MacBook on tiptoe to avoid waking it.

      --
      "Algebraical symbols are used when you don't know what you are talking about" - BCS
    61. Re:Really? by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Even if your stuff is encrypted with your login, your login can be compromised.

      I bought a used MacBook black off a kid on CL a month ago for 500. It was about 6 months old and in new condition. Why so cheap? He had gotten a work laptop and only used the MacBook on and off. Then stopped altogether when he forgot his password.

      5 min Google search and another 5 running through some steps, I had reset the root and all local account pwds from the console (his g/f is pretty hot).

      If you're that worried, I'd suggest using something like a TrueCrypt container with a seperate password to dump important things you keep on your laptop.

      Anyway, yeah I coulda wiped it too and been set, but I was curious to see if it could be done. I sold it a few days ago for 900 :)

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    62. Re:Really? by ptelligence · · Score: 1

      You could eliminate the live CD threat by locking down the boot options in BIOS and setting a password. Now they've got to physically remove the hard disk to get access to your data. Combine that with a DiskLock a la IBM, and it's a little trickier to get into your system. You can't fully secure a system against physical access, but you can make it a lot tougher to get into.

    63. Re:Really? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      One effective method of capturing RAM is to simply reboot the system and load a special Linux distro that dumps it. Unless the BIOS is set to do a full RAM check of course, which wipes every bit and typically executes before the user can enter the (hopefully password protected) BIOS config.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    64. Re:Really? by PhearoX · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? A LiveCD specifically designed to locate porn? I mean, they even talk about how it only detects mpeg and jpg files, and list "skin-tone analysis" as a feature to only match on "relevant" files. I can see how this might help a child porn investigation, but the scope is cripplingly limited on this thing...

    65. Re:Really? by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Who uses MS encryption software?
      That is like playing Russian roulette with a full magazine.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    66. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still gets ridiculously pointless. If I were hiding incriminating information, I would hardly keep it in an encrypted partition. As law enforcement gets more knowledgeable forensics, criminals will just take it a step further. Hiding data in plain sight always works perfectly fine for the professionals. You can hide data in images and various application documents. Good luck finding that data. Giving law enforcement more "tools" only provides a means for them to stamp on more of your liberties. These tools will hardly be restrained for real criminals. You can bet they will be at every customs and HSA office. The last thing you want, when going through the airport screening, is for them to find an encrypted file. They are too ignorant and have watched too many movies to understand.

    67. Re:Really? by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 1

      My reply was a joke. Certainly overshadowed by extremely funny 'I think you mean your mom.'. I'll bet you were up nights writing that joke.

      --
      ~ Ron Fitzgerald
    68. Re:Really? by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      Just add a few more characters, using a full alphanumeric set with special characters will mean it takes 94x longer to bruteforce with every additional character. And to make it better you don't need to use the full set( although you should try to) you only need to make sure that the NSA thinks you do so that they will search it.

      It doesn't take a genius to realize that you could easily contract a passphrase that is invulnerable to all but sufficiently large amounts of cash.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    69. Re:Really? by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      Physical access is the killer, however a usb device that plugs into a system that is running and logged in has more access to a system than a live cd that cannot access encrypoted disks.

      On the other hand, if they have access to a system they can tamper with the data. Thay could delete proof, or worse, plant evidence.

    70. Re:Really? by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...Define "bad people", please...

      Anyone who does to others or says things about others, what wouldn't like it if it were done to them. They don't obey "The Golden Rule".

      --
      All theory is gray
    71. Re:Really? by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....If I were hiding incriminating information....

      I would put it onto a USB drive that could be instantly unplugged and "disappeared", if it was even in use at the time. Cutting the power to the computer is also quickly done.

      When the USB is not in use, it would be kept in a safe place where the likelihood of it being found is remote. They could then plug their device in and boot up the computer and search to their heart's content. As it is, I don't have any deep dark secrets so this is purely academic.

      --
      All theory is gray
    72. Re:Really? by Quantom00 · · Score: 1

      Apple has an internal only tool to reset the Master password for FileVault. However, it seems to only be available in Cupertino.

    73. Re:Really? by thanatos_x · · Score: 1

      I'm not an expert, but I imagine the problem was the bit level of encryption, as well as the algorithm used.

      For example, if you're using a 32 bit encryption, it doesn't matter how long your password is - the hash space is still too small, and the password can be trivially brute forced. (This is the case with DES - it's a 64bit algorithm (and only 56 bit effective strength. Your 20 character password isn't of strength 94^20, but 2^56.))

      If the algorithm is found to have a weakness, this also makes it easier. Some algorithms become easier to attack if you have a certain amount of unencrypted and encrypted data.

      Finally a simple password does make it easier for educated guesses; a machine that can make a billion guesses a second exhausts all possible 5 character passwords in a few seconds, but takes 94^3 to guess an 8 character string.

      You're limited in security to the weakest link. 1&2 are somewhat related, 3 is independent. Brute force attacks 1, 2 is used to reduce the size of the attack by mathematics, and 3 is used if insufficient randomness or length is used.

      Speculation is that the NSA has found ways to factor large numbers very fast (Factoring = P, not NP complete), has a very large amount of computing at their disposal, or has found a weakness in the algorithm (say, reducing search size by a factor of 2^40), and hence why they've gotten silent of public encryption

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute_force_attack
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Encryption_Standard

      --
      I am not an expert. If I am misled in something, please correct me.
    74. Re:Really? by v1 · · Score: 1

      For example, if you're using a 32 bit encryption, it doesn't matter how long your password is - the hash space is still too small, and the password can be trivially brute forced. (This is the case with DES - it's a 64bit algorithm (and only 56 bit effective strength. Your 20 character password isn't of strength 94^20, but 2^56.))

      While on the surface that appears to be a complete assessment, it misses one possible wrench in the works. It requires a quick way to assess whether or not the passphrase provided was correct.

      Most bitlocking methods DO include a check sequence, some set value that will be a predefined value once decrypted, that lets you know the passphrase was the correct one. Simply make this check phrase short. (as in, say, 12 bit) instead of large (like 64 bit etc) This will produce many false positives in a brute force attack. It won't do a LOT to make things more difficult, but it will add a few orders of additional time to the process.

      There's one more facet that I don't know if can be applied to this or not, and that's making the process of hashing the password very time consuming. (such as 300 iterations of reseeding with a fractal or something, and stuffing it through a very processor intensive hash each pass) Most users won't care if they have to wait an extra 2 seconds to login, but that can provide a monstrous hike in required time to brute force. We see this in license validation systems nowadays... you enter that huge key and it takes 2-3 seconds to move onto the next screen or to tell you to re-enter/correct it. They're doing that to make it impractical to decompile their validator and use it to generate valid keys quickly, by making it take a very long time to validate each generated key.

      This latter addition is still going to become less effective as processor power goes up, but it should provide a much larger buffer to work with. As is always going to be the case, any method we code today that takes 2 seconds to validate you, will be able to be brute forced in 10 seconds 10 years from now. Such is technology.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    75. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got to bed around 3-4 in the morning.

    76. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FileVault is worse than useless for normal users. When current Macs sleep, they write the contents of their RAM to the 'sleepimage' in /var/vm. It is written unencrypted and if the user has logged in, it contains a copy of the login password in cleartext.

      Admittedly, finding the password is not a trivial task, but it's just a matter of time if you can read the sleepimage.

    77. Re:Really? by Dextrously · · Score: 1

      No unix using a non-encrypted file system is secure if you have physical access to the machine...Why would you assume it's any different with Windows?

      I'd just boot knoppix and mount the partition. There, I have access to all the files. That goes for windows AND unix/linux.

      If you really depend on the password for anything other than stopping casual or remote access, you're just fooling yourself. Did you miss the part about the decrypting of the passwords? Linux can be made secure from local attack (sledgehammer proof?), this story basically says that Windows has back doors built in just waiting to be found or simply used.

    78. Re:Really? by RMB2 · · Score: 1
      nurb, this is Sarcasm. Apparently you haven't met.

      In response to the comment

      what will happen when bad people get their hands on this technology I was implying that the Police are the "bad people"
      --
      [/sarcasm]
    79. Re:Really? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      I have studied File Vault for a paper I was writing a while back. Secure Virtual Memory MUST be turned on or I can find multiple copies of your password on disk. Apple doesn't memlock this information to prevent it from going into swap. I never looked around for the actual disk image key used to see if it spreads around.

      I didn't read into auto login; however, I was able to totally mess up my login keychain while still having the OS auto login the account in 10.5; therefore, a normal login doesn't use the keychain (I didn't do it with filevault on, obviously.)

      Without a valid disk image header/footer there is nothing usable; I used to copy those parts of the file just in case I got into that bad of a situation.

      Passwords- disk images can be attacked at full speed; pick a good password because brute force cracks everything under 8 chars in a few weeks on consumer gear.

      RAM: technically ram can be recovered, since 10.5 allocation is less predictable but if you run for months before reboot/unmount of your disk image that data has been 'burned' into your ram. The specifics on this area are unclear but Guttman has a nice paper on it (and on Vista.) There IS an app for mac that will run without a trace and without authentication that will "crack" the user passwords within seconds. I've seen it.

      USER folder:
      without encrypting WHOLE disks you risk temp files, caching, etc storing information outside your encrypted area. Hardly any apps tell you where the data goes with enough detail. (You basically have to install Apple's free add on for security auditing, and that only tells you what system calls were performed.)

      Things have changed around as apple has messed around with combinations of unix, netinfo, ldap and keychain for security. That mess is sure to have some bugs in it...

      Single Point of Failure? well you have lots of those already. I have been using encrypted sparse image files and encrypted static image files since it was possible over a decade ago and while I've had to repair the HFS+ systems (on disk and on the disk image) I have never lost one. I would however be happy if apple would store extents and file headers for FileVault for emergency situations.

      I HAVE however lost my keychain 3 times to data corruption (and without any FS errors too.) Also NOTE: the keychain sits UNLOCKED in RAM even when it is locked in the GUI. I am not sure about extra keychains at this time (which is where I put stuff, since only the login keychain has ever been damaged beyond repair in the past.)

      Secure delete and secure wipe of free space are largely a waste of time. Remember, you can plead the 5th only for now in the USA and only when it doesn't incriminate you directly does the 5th even work.

      I have written AES code, its plenty secure for now; it doesn't have any backdoors.

    80. Re:Really? by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Actually, more likely it's because they don't NEED to.

      If the NSA -really- wants to read the files you store in an encrypted partition, there are many ways to do it that are MUCH simpler than say cracking AES.

      For example, they can break into your house and insert a keylogger in your machine or keyboard, wait until you've used the encrypted machine, then clone your hard-disk and decrypt it using the password from the keylogger. You'd not notice anything. Total investment, a couple of hours for a pair of field-agents. Trivial.

      Most peoples security is so lax that this kind of stuff is easy. ANY amount of computer-security is completely trivially breakable aslong as there is no PHYSICAL security.

      If you can HONESTLY say there is NO way the NSA could get 10 minutes alone with your machine without you noticing it, THEN it may be time to start worrying about other stuff.

      For 99.9% of all people though, getting physical access to their machines is easy for a dedicated and resourceful adversary.

    81. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google on Firewire too - game over.
      USB is likely untrustworthy, with some obsure id-code triggering something.
      The best defence is not to use windows and to have nothing of importance on your drives, but on usb drives - but if located, game over.
      Failing that, have some old crashed drives that you picked up 2nd hand from somewhere, so that any court case can be faulted if rash assumptions are made.

      If computer disposal charges rise much further, it might be a good and free way to get rid of your rubbish/technoscrap - because you will never get it back.
      What forensic people dread most, is a PC case filled with cigarette butts, ash, used needles, as some PC's (and monitors) become ashtrays, stinking up the shop, then finding that the PC was never connected, and only solitare and 1 other game played.

    82. Re:Really? by judo_badger · · Score: 1

      I use file vault. It's not quite as effective as let's say full disk encryption, but if you turn on the encrypted virtual memory option, it's pretty darn good. The caveat with encryption systems is that they can be more susceptible to data loss. A small amount of corruption can lead to large amounts of data loss. That's what backups are for. All in all, I'm much happier knowing that if my Macbook gets stolen, all that I've lost is the hardware.

    83. Re:Really? by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      After a few replies, I trust I have made my point. The GP's statement (what will happen when "bad people" get a hold of this techonology) is too vague. Everybody's definition of "bad people" differs, insomuch that basically it can be anybody. So it's no use wondering what the next person will do with the technology, it's anybody's guess.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    84. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to what you may have been taught, most of the world does NOT live in the USA, and so WA is perfectly fine as an abbreviation for Western Australia, West Arpanet, or Warty Asshole or anything else.

      That is all.

  40. Maybe this "security device" is simply... by dyfet · · Score: 1

    ...a USB drive that boots something like Knoppix with NTFS file system support! ;)....

    People have been using that to recover data from broken and otherwise defective Microsoft Windows boxes for a long time now...

    1. Re:Maybe this "security device" is simply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll go you one better: I use Norton's Ghost in various capacities, and it's completely non-destructive and simple to use. I don't know if it's forensics-grade or not, but there's one advantage that nobody seems to have mentioned: This technique can be done in a suspect's home with no need to sieze any physical assets. This means that the cops don't have to physically take your computer to a crime lab somewhere to search it.

      So tell me which you'd rather have: a consentual contact where a cop plugs a USB drive in to your PC and copies your data, or a half-dozen guys storming your place with a search warrant, carting all your gear off in vans, knowing full well that most of it will never be seen again.

    2. Re:Maybe this "security device" is simply... by izelrenevato · · Score: 1

      From my sources not to be named it seems one device is kind of like that. It also has some sort of scripts that pretty much go and find all the images on your system and arrange them in an use to view manner. This is not much different from a lot of free download tools that many have already installed. The idea is that they can clip through a system at a crime scene and see if you have anything that looks like "child pornography" which especially in the UK is a big bugaboo. Here(US) it's that and anything that might be radical islamic literature. So if someone's system is boring they can walk away and not have to lug the system somewhere. This is because there have been real problems with seizing computers in a casual way and finding very pissed judges. Last I had looked however in the case of things other than going through customs in casual encounters the "closed container" rule applied. If the laptop or computer was unaccesable without a password on even turning it on then the powers that be could not turn it on and start looking for things . Now crime scene things get weird. Often they try to seize as much as possible and then if the judge in the case throws it out "oh well..." Have Fun, Sends Steve

  41. MS is giving out for free by Intron · · Score: 1

    Naturally they don't want police to have to carry around Knoppix CDs.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    1. Re:MS is giving out for free by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      I have made it easier for them.
      I store my password to Windows as a Post-It note stuck on my PC's side box.
      After all, as per our Dear Leader, if i have nothing to hide then why hide it at all!
      Heil !

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:MS is giving out for free by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Close. Police use Helix.

  42. FUD by idlemind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when has physical access to a machine ever been safe for any operating system? Also, it's not like Microsoft programmed in back doors for law enforcement; they are just bundling their version of script kiddie hacks.

    1. Re:FUD by RedShoeRider · · Score: 1
      "Also, it's not like Microsoft programmed in back doors for law enforcement; they are just bundling their version of script kiddie hacks."

      Really? Have you examined all of Microsoft's souce code to make sure there is not a backdoor?

      --

      Chris Knight is my hero.

    2. Re:FUD by idlemind · · Score: 1

      I am referring to the article which says nothing about back doors or internal mechanisms implemented in Windows by Microsoft to aid police investigations. The summary would lead you to believe this is the case.

      I am not saying no back doors exist.

  43. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "It basically bypasses all of the Windows security (decrypting passwords, etc.) in order to eliminate all that pesky privacy when the police have physical access to your computer."

    WOW; that's a really biased summary. Here's what the article actually says:

    "The device contains 150 commands that can dramatically cut the time it takes to gather digital evidence, which is becoming more important in real-world crime, as well as cybercrime. It can decrypt passwords and analyze a computer's Internet activity, as well as data stored in the computer."

    Between those lines, I do not see what you see...

  44. Do they sell them to CIOs? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If I were a CIO, I'd want to make sure that either I could decrypt and analyze all the bits in my enterprise, or that nobody outside my enterprise could.

    In other words, if there is a back door and I don't have it, the OS is not welcome in my shop.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Do they sell them to CIOs? by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Yeah... remember to use Truecrypt Full Disk Encryption with your own admin recovery disks to prevent outsiders from reading the files they shouldnt be.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  45. It's not a bug, its a featutre! by thtrgremlin · · Score: 1

    Isn't the same old story? If you can't fix it, sell it! Vulnerabilities are now being 'sold' as police investigator tools. What next? Also, if you read the EULA for Vista (Probably applies to XP also) Microsoft can already access any files on any machine remotely, so long as it has an active internet connection. I think it was also determined recently as a part of that there is a special root login that only Microsoft has for all Windows machines giving more access than a normal administrator. Remember, they own it, and you lease the right to use it. :)

    --
    Want Big Business out of government? Take away the incentive and start by getting government out of big business!
  46. LIAR! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    This is huge! Windows passwords aren't enough to secure my porn! Call the government! Call nasa! Call a lawyer! This is an outrage!

    Seriously. Does anyone here NOT know how to pull all the data off a windows machine without a password? I can think of a half-dozen ways to do it, and there is plenty of commercial software out there if you wanted to purchase some.

    If someone has physical access to your machine, it is NOT secure. This is why people use encryption.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:LIAR! by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      I'm interested to see how you would pull it off mine. The work computer has pointsec, and the linux box has full disk encryption as well.

    2. Re:LIAR! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      "If someone has physical access to your machine, it is NOT secure. This is why people use encryption."

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:LIAR! by mtgarden · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the question is one of social engineering. And patch levels. If you can't be socially engineered, then maybe someone else in your company can be. If they are, can we hack your system from theirs?

      Not saying that you are wrong, but there are ways to bypass encryption. It just takes a little longer.

      PS. Watch out for those malicious QuickTime videos.... They'll take everyone's system for a ride.

    4. Re:LIAR! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I think the point to this is fast non-reboot copying of certain directories, without browsing on the computer (if the device can be proven non-destructive and accurate, there is less ability to blame planting (of course it certainly still exists as a defense).

      This can avoid some encryption problems by not requiring a reboot.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  47. Pirate Bay by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

    So how long do you think it will be before the files on these thumb drives show up on TPB?

    1. Re:Pirate Bay by thtrgremlin · · Score: 1

      I think Microsoft just took Knoppix off of TPB and renamed it claiming First Sale Doctrine.

      --
      Want Big Business out of government? Take away the incentive and start by getting government out of big business!
    2. Re:Pirate Bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just think if it was - it would be under GPL, and Microsoft would be forced to disclose it...

    3. Re:Pirate Bay by thtrgremlin · · Score: 1

      Microsoft 'forced'... hmm... Like they were 'forced to break up in the US, and 'forced' to pay huge fines in the EU? M$ seems to have its own feelings about 'forced'.

      --
      Want Big Business out of government? Take away the incentive and start by getting government out of big business!
  48. Viruses? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    So as soon as a law enforcement type plugs this into the Bad Guy's computer, a virus is installed on the thumb drive and gets installed on every other machine that the drive is plugged into. (Like Mr. Law Enforcement's own desktop!!!)

    Great Idea(tm) (:-)

    Imagine the TSA was using these. Every businessman's computer would be owned. If the virus also disabled the detection systems, our Bad Guy could also attack other bad guy's systems. He'd rule the world... Bwa Ha Ha Ha....

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Viruses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      our Bad Guy could also attack other bad guy's systems. He'd rule the world... Bwa Ha Ha Ha.... ... unless we pay him [air quotes] ONE MILLION DOLLARS! [/air quotes]
  49. There is no security without physical security by Eskarel · · Score: 1
    Who really cares? With the exception of file or whole drive encryption, which this device isn't going to help with anyway, if someone has physical access to your box for any length of time, they have access to your machine, doesn't matter what OS you're running, or how complex your password is, phyiscal access to your box will give them any unencrypted data eventually.

    With the right tools you can read files regardless of permissions, change passwords, add users, etc, almost anything. Building a linux live cd which can read most file formats and ignores ACL's and that's not even counting the various and sundry tools available which allow you to change even a root password to a machine you've forgotten the credentials to.

    If the cops or anyone else has your PC they have access to anything on it that's not ecrypted, whether Microsoft wins some quick PR with law enforcement by making it easy for them or not. This is essentially a non story.

  50. Have to give MS props for this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate MS as much as the next guy, but I have to admit MS has the lead over Linux in the field of community service. If the Linux community cared about society as much as MS did, there would be much less crime.

    1. Re:Have to give MS props for this one by mozkill · · Score: 1

      huh? just so you know, you can boot up and get access to all the files in a linux distro just as easily as this article says you can on Microsoft distros.

      --

      -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
  51. Torrent anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK... So where can we download that tool? I got a couple of FUBARed computers which could definitely be saved with something like that.

  52. UAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No big deal. It's a USB keyboard with only an "I agree" button, and it's stuck.

  53. It's OK, theyre doing it to keep the internet safe by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 1
    Best quote from Brad Smith (of Microsoft):

    "We're doing this to help ensure that the Internet stays safe." That's a relief.

    Seriously though, I'm curious to know more about what exactly this does. At first I assumed this was typical /. FUD and was essentially just a bootable USB drive to dodge Windows user permissions etc. but from reading the article it does actually sound like it's taking advantage of real security flaws in a running instance of the OS.
    --
    Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
  54. Just one question... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    Anybody have a torrent of the files on this thumb drive? Might be fun to play with! ;-)

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    1. Re:Just one question... by mozkill · · Score: 1

      yeah, if it actually exists, why not share it with everyone? if you did that, then maybe someone would patch it right? lol. if nobody steps forward with a thumbdrive, ill assume this article is fake propaganda.

      --

      -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
    2. Re:Just one question... by randyest · · Score: 1

      Right. If no one gives you what you want, it doesn't exist. Idiot.

      --
      everything in moderation
  55. RE: Just one more reason not to run Windows by Gitcho · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm all for protecting personal privacy, but if investigators are using these tools to comb through your PC, you don't need to stop using windows - you need to stop committing crimes.

  56. No Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone in computer forensics, this type of tool is supposed to be used after the police have gotten access to your hard drive via court order.

    Man, if I got an electron microscope and enough time, I can find your data. I understand people are worried about using this outside of the legal frame of the law, but as computers get more and more used to commit crimes we shouldn't be upset with the tools that are used but how they are being used.

    1. Re:No Big Deal by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      I don't mind if tools are being used - but when the company that someone buys something from gives them a defective product (as in windows, since it seems that this takes advantage of security flaws) and then goes and gives someone else a way to exploit the defects in their own product, that's just wrong.

  57. Ram-resident data can be lost by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Part of modern computer forensics is preserving as much of the state of the computer as possible BEFORE power is lost.

    Granted, the state is in constant flux, but the cops really do want to grab any and all RAM-resident security keys, the contents of RAM disks, data not yet fully saved to files, etc.

    The wet dream of a computer forensics expert is a computer he can put into hibernation without risking the loss of any data that has a "I'm going into hibernation mode, I better erase myself" detector.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  58. interesting. by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

    hmm.

    I have a compact distro on a thumb drive that I can boot on, mount ntfs vfat and rifle through a computer should I wish - but this sounds like its more comprehensive then that. And if it is designed for widespread cop usage then it must be extremely user friendly as well. And TFA implies you do not even need to power down the PC.

    So.. I would a guess an auto run application that is designed from the bottom up the bypass security, promote to admin rights, scan for files matching keywords, copy log files, backup fat, scan partition information, mount any unmounted partitions, get internet history, scan for deleted files, log torrent trackers. Hell there is an awful lot that could be obtained quickly and then analyzed later on once saved on the thumb drive. It could even alert officers for clear violations to prompt for arrest.

    Clever little toy.

    1. its going to help drive a lot of people to not use Windows - I already do not.
    2. If windows had a rigorous and well implemented security system this would not be possible in any case.
    3. Its an open challenge to the wares communities to copy and reverse engineer
    4. It promotes the belief that there must be back doors into Windows that this gizmo utilizes.
    5. I guarantee that something like this will become the norm at customs/airports for a lot of cases if it is fast enough - something on the lines of hold on sir, please plug your PC into this for 30 seconds whilst we scan for illegal behavior
    6. Running Linux will simply open you to suspicion and a more in depth analysis.

  59. It basically bypasses all of the Windows security by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

    And was one of the easiest things that Microsoft has ever done.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  60. And quite honestly... by citizenklaw · · Score: 1

    If you use TrueCrypt or other similar products to encrypt the entire hard drive I don't think this doohickey will be very effective. My laptop uses an encryption product for the entire hdd and when I boot into Ubuntu LiveCD I can't see a thing.

    Bottom Line: Encrypt the entire thing and be done with it. Truecrypt FTW!

    --
    the future is but past forgotten
  61. So who needs Microsoft's device? by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  62. My laptop was stolen a few weeks ago ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The cops busted the thieves as they were still on my property and with the loot. Although the thieves did not have enough time to crack my laptop, the police kept it for forensic analysis instead of returning it immediately.

    Lesson for anyone reading this post: Use secure wipe when buying a used laptop and encrypt if you value your privacy. It is probably standard police procedure to snoop in people's files whenever the opportunity presents itself. I am grateful for recovering my laptop but its feel like a second violation with such intrusive methods.

  63. Nevermind the Fourth Amendment...It's obsolete... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...along with the Geneva convention. It's all part of the new world order.

    If you don't have anything to hide, then you won't mind me looking through your briefcase.

    First, US as world policeman with Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld leading the charge . Now, MS as internet policeman, with Ballmer/Smith leading the way.

    Advice to Jerry Yao: ditch all MS products.

  64. Nothing to Hide... by SilentBob0727 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In unrelated news, it is now a felony not to run Windows on your machine, and Linus Torvalds has gone into hiding.

    --
    Life would be easier if I had the source code.
    1. Re:Nothing to Hide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Linus Torvalds has gone into hiding If that's what it takes...
    2. Re:Nothing to Hide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In unrelated news, it is now a felony not to run Windows on your machine, and Linus Torvalds has gone into hiding. dual bootings still ok tho right?
  65. Could set crooks free easier too by JustASlashDotGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    FTA:

    It also eliminates the need to seize a computer itself, which typically involves disconnecting from a network, turning off the power and potentially losing data. Instead, the investigator can scan for evidence on site. The second you plug one of these into the suspect's machine while it's running, you just set the criminal free. Reason being, you potentially just altered the original source of data and could have injected you own "evidence". Any lawyer would get you off in a heart beat.

    You'd always have to shut it down, image the drive, and then run your test against the image. If you ever so much as boot the image and use the device at that point, you've still just changed a shit load of files during the boot up process and a lawyer may still be able to get you off.

    This device is only helpful if it contains a standalone script that can be pointed to a set of files on a write-blocked drive. Blindly letting it have full read/write access to any drive would be instant not-guilty result.

    Unless this device gets some hefty certs, I'd be surprised if any law enforcement agency that reports to the public courts would ever use this device as reported.

    1. Re:Could set crooks free easier too by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "...could have injected you own "evidence"."
      this is true no matter what investigation is happening, and nobody gets off for the possibility of planting evidence.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Could set crooks free easier too by JustASlashDotGuy · · Score: 1

      "...could have injected you own "evidence"."
      this is true no matter what investigation is happening, and nobody gets off for the possibility of planting evidence. When data is imaged from a source drive, an inline write block is placed on the cable to prevent any data from being written to the source.

      A USB drive plugged directly into the back of the source machine clearly opens the machine up to be compromised.

      So yes, if someone placed a device directly into the back of a source machine then any evidence gathered would be thrown out (in public courts).

      The only exception to the above example would be if the device had some nice certs to back it up in court, but even then... screwing with source data in such a direct way is asking for trouble.

      So... If I accused you of being a crook and I suspected evidence was on your machine, would you blindly allow me to start plugging USB sticks in your machine for the purposes of "scanning"? ... Or would you request that a properly image of the drive be done first, and all scans must be made against that backup?

    3. Re:Could set crooks free easier too by jschottm · · Score: 1

      The second you plug one of these into the suspect's machine while it's running, you just set the criminal free. Reason being, you potentially just altered the original source of data and could have injected you own "evidence". Any lawyer would get you off in a heart beat.

      Not at all. Doing a memory capture of running systems (if possible) is considered a standard operating procedure in computer forensics. You do so in a controlled manner using standard, well established tools in a documented manner and you're fine. In theory the latest research into dumping memory immediately after a quick reboot might be better, but that research is new enough that it's not worked its way into the legal system.

      ALL digital forensics comes down to a matter of trust. There is no more proof that the version of dd I use to dump (pre-Vista) Window's memory is corrupting evidence than there is that it will reliably image a drive that's been mounted in write only mode. But if I say based on my industry best practices training (with accompanying certification), I used the Helix Live CD version foo (md5sum suchandsuch) to use dd for windows version bar(md5sum suchandsuch) with the command line of suchandsuch piped to nc (version baz, md5sum such and such) which transmitted the image to my acquisition server...

      It holds up.

  66. Am I trolling again? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    When I said you should have your computer dual boot, with networking disabled on the windows side (which is how my PC was set up before the power supply burned out last week) so you wouldn't get viruses, spyware, and other nasties on your PC I was modded "troll".

    Now the summary says "Just one more reason not to run Windows on your computer."

    I guess the submitter was trolling? But at any rate, it seems to me that since Windows can't read hda, as long as you keep your terrorism plans, drug dealers' phone books, child pornography, and stolen state secterts off the windows side of your computer you're safe, right?

    Wrong. If I have physical access to your machine I can probably get in pretty easily, and I'm no security expert. The cops have the funding to hire top notch guys who WILL decode that drive.

    I can't for the life of me figure out why Microsoft would produce this tool, as it only makes them look bad. If someone made a Linux tool to crack windows, the Microsoft apologists and astroturfers would be screaming "FUD!"

    The malware boys wil get a copy and make it so it works online. What fun!

    (as one slashdotter's sig says, "karma: excellent. Try again, modboy!")

    -mcgrew

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:Am I trolling again? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      There are millions of copies of this tool online already. Any image for making a NTFS-capable boot-cd or boot-disk accomplishes the same thing. There are also millions of copies of tools for doing the exact same thing to OSX and Linux.

      And yes, the submitter was definitely trolling.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  67. Rumors, just rumors! by pig-power · · Score: 0

    All those little snippetts/reports over the years about "backdoors/trapdoors" into Windows aren't seeming so far fetched today?? Microsofts stock value starts to slip...OH!! time to market to the government for security! Just another day in the USSA.

  68. DMCA violation? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...as in, selling the means to bypass copy protection?

    rj

    1. Re:DMCA violation? by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      It isn't a DMCA violation if the DRM producers themselves provide the decryption tools for you.

  69. How much privacy do we really have? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Investigators can probably find anything on your computer no matter what O/S you use.

    Microsoft just made it alot easier.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  70. So what we now know by geekoid · · Score: 1

    is that a program CAN be written to bypass all windows security using a dongle.

    hmmm

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:So what we now know by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      How is a collection of tools on a thumb drive different from a collection of tools on a CD? How is a collection of Windows tools used to decrypt passwords and collect forensic data different from such a collection for Linux?

      This is nothing new...given physical access to any machine a determined person will be able to get at your files, passwords, etc no matter the OS. "Bypass" is used by the article submitter but is not found in the article. "Defeat" would be a more accurate characterization of what the tools do.

      In other words, there's no back door, there's nothing to see here.

  71. This has already been done by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    www.isoHunt.com
    1. Re:This has already been done by palewook · · Score: 2, Informative
  72. Linux based Windows registry editor by BcNexus · · Score: 1

    I wonder if wine's regedit can load native Windows registry hives You don't need to go through that hassle. Just grab and burn the "Offline NT Password and Registry Editor bootable linux ISO", burn it, boot it, then view and edit the registry: http://home.eunet.no/pnordahl/ntpasswd/
  73. Nothing really new.. by greywire · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not sure what the big deal is.

    If you are a computer forensic investigator you already have many available tools (EnCase, etc) to do the same thing, not to mention the obvious linux based free tools (Helix, etc) that let you pound away on a computer (or captured image) and get whatever you want off it.

    Keeping your computer completely secure is about as practical as copyright owners keeping their data totally protected. Its always an escalating two way battle and the winner is just the one who's willing to go the farthest with it, but nothing is 100% safe.

    Privacy and DRM are both doomed for the same reasons.

    Get over it.

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    1. Re:Nothing really new.. by wodon · · Score: 1

      Yup, the tool isnt really that exciting.
      Just produces a nice report of the system it is run on. Which is the only useful part. (yes, I have a beta)
      The "decryption" part is simply because you are plugging it into an already decrypted system, meaning that if the user is logged on and has their encrypted volumes open then it can view them.
      All of which could be imaged using FTK lite or other off the shelf utilities.
      Or even using the very high tech cop method of "clicking around in explorer"

      --
      It's My Tea and I'll Drink it if I Want To!
    2. Re:Nothing really new.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, and this isn't a device. It's a software application that runs on a thumb drive; nothing more. It's just a command line util to retrieve information off a computer in which the user is already logged in. Nothing nefarious here, it's been done time and time before. //I use COFEE

    3. Re:Nothing really new.. by Hymer · · Score: 1

      It is... if it can crack Vistas BitLocker protected drives...
      ...and if it can then MS will lose the rest of their credibility.
      Just consider following: "With this borrowed police USB gadget I can read CIA/NSA/Pentagon secret files on this laptop I found in the subway."
      ...and I can't image why MS should release a tool like that if it couldn't crack BitLocker.

    4. Re:Nothing really new.. by wodon · · Score: 1

      Would be interesting, but it can't.
      It just gets the keys from ram if the running machine already has the encrypted drive mounted.

      The idea being that the cops can bash the door in and get to the machine while it is up and running.

      Exactly the same way that dd can by imaging \\.\PhysicalMemory

      --
      It's My Tea and I'll Drink it if I Want To!
  74. Re:It's OK, theyre doing it to keep the internet s by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    "We're doing this to help ensure that the Internet stays safe."

    Thank God! I'd hate to have someone murder me over the internet!

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  75. Why does anyone have a problem with this? by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. Let's stop throwing out the Men in Black Helicopters theories and Bill gates is Trampling My First Amendment Rights crap. If a computer is held for evidence in a child porn case, for example, then why would anyone here have a problem with a tool that makes it easier to collect said evidence from the computer to prosecute the offenders?

    Let's forget there are already plenty of tools available to do this. So bitching about this is just farking stupid in the first place...

    I turned in a client over a year ago for possession of child porn. I don't have one regret in doing so. When I turned the kid's computer in, I saw first-hand how carefully the police treat such things in order to preserve all evidence. If there's a tool out there that makes this process easier to nail people, then I say go for it. Stop bitching. No one's out to nail you for your WaRez.

    1. Re:Why does anyone have a problem with this? by Noted+Futurist · · Score: 1

      Just to state what should be obvious:
      If the system is totally ownable by the POLICE with a thumbdrive, then it is ownable by ANYONE with the thumbdrive- and probably remotely as well.

    2. Re:Why does anyone have a problem with this? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      "No one's out to nail you for your WaRez."

      This is very true. Nobody that has the power and resources to effectively hunt down copyright infringers cares at all about them. The police certainly don't -- they're overbooked as it is investigating actual crimes.

    3. Re:Why does anyone have a problem with this? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Then I congratulate you (seriously) for doing your public duty - and if and when they find the guy guilty, I'm all for the police locking him in a cell and throwing away the key, or even taking him round the back of the police station and putting a bullet in his brain stem.

      But let me put it this way:

      A very small percentage of people who use computers are paedophiles.

      Or:

      A very large percentage of people who use computers consider themselves responsible and moral enough to live as decent citizens within the law without the need for the police to snoop on them.

      So please don't link child porn and privacy intrusion because there is no link - it's just an excuse for ineffectual police forces to forget about proper detective work and just assume that everyone is automatically guilty of something by snooping on them using technology.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  76. Windows security? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    It basically bypasses all of the Windows security

    Windows has security?

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  77. I don't see what the big deal is by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    If you have physical access to a computer, you can read the hard disk of any computer now -- Windows or otherwise -- without some special gizmo. All you need is a Linux live CD, or something like that.

    Frankly, I don't understand the need for this gizmo in the first place.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  78. How much is this worth... by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    On the black market?

    Imagine the chaos this will produce once someone sells it off and its modified to work over a network!. Money talks and we all know the man is just as corruptible as the consumer. Sorry I meant citizen.

    Well this is a good time and excuse to finally really try to wheen myself off windows.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  79. Re: Just one more reason not to run Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crime is cool!

  80. encryption is useless by gnutoo · · Score: 1

    when someone else has your passwords.

    To decide how harmful something is, you need to consider the worst thing it will do. Obviously, the police don't need this cracker kit from the soft to boot knoppix and read your unencrypted cruft they want what you consider safe. That might be SatanicPuppy's kiddie porn but there's real potential for abuse here.

    Without privacy, you get political and economic abuse. For instance, the people who kept Code Pink, aka political opposition, out of Canada by falsifying information in a database would also love to know who else to harm by reading their contacts at the border. Microsoft would love to read the business secrets or their competitors.

    The bootom line is that Microsoft has just admitted it's systems are backdoored so that they can get passwords. Those systems and anything made by Microsoft is suspect - don't use it if you value your business, privacy or freedom.

  81. As if we didn't know this was possible. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    This has probably been possible since XP SP2, if not shortly thereafter.

    And suspect that at some point the 'police' will 'accidentally' or 'inadvertantly' leak this to the outside, and woops, there it is...

    The only unanswered questions are:

    - Is this 'feature' part of foreign language versions? I expect these governments will be interested in this feature...

    - What other government agencies will have access to this tool, and under what circumstances?

    Well, we can be pwned with a warrant, want, or secret finding.

    Again, as if we didn't know this was possible. So much for secrecy in Windows. Get yer Ubuntu running, gang, and your PGPDisk. I recommend the full disk encryption option as best.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  82. Dear Microsoft : Save U.S. Democracy and Help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    crack this criminal's e-mail about torture.

    Cordially,
    Kilgore Trout

  83. Use a Virtual Machine by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    Use a VMware machien that has it's disk file loaded on an ecrapted partition and have the machyne itself installed on a encrapted partition, but hide the VMware machine files on a partition that is mounted to a folder name deep within the windows file system so it can't easily be seen. Let them pull your data, all of it will be from your normal "clean" parition on your C drive, do some regualr surfing on the main machine and keep a seprate clean E-mail account on it as well. When their little keys finds nothing of interest you can get away with anything with your Virtual Desktop and they can't prove a thing!

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:Use a Virtual Machine by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 1

      ...on an eCRAPted partition...

      Jon Law: well, we'll just pull the disk out and ... EWWWW!!! What's this!!! it's full of poo! He must have ecrapted his drive!!

      Or better-- I believe, and slashdot should agree that any drive, virtual or not, that has Windows installed on it has already been enCRAPted.

      <RIMSHOT>
      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
  84. COFEE by Saint+Gerbil · · Score: 1

    Discussions there led to the creation of COFEE. I normally make coffee before I start discussions. one lump or two ?

  85. what's the bets that it's running Linux? by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    .....this is the body .....

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  86. Its when, not how by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

    It's _when_ it will be used. Console access with nifty commands isn't new or earth shattering. Access with a feature set of brainless tools is something different.

    Legitimate investigations aside; I can see the benefits here. I'm curious how tools like this would apply to other types of searches.

    Using live CD's or rebooting from CD/source is slightly more technical and hugely invasive to forensics (to the point of completely destructive many would agree), so the effect is that MS is selling a collection of hacking tools designed to make investigations easier.

    By extension, if its easier, I think it could gain some momentum for gray area investigations or researches.
    - traffic stops
    - border/us customs
    - Oh, you want to be a big brother/foster parent?

    I dunno, I could have had an extra cup of 'Extremist' this AM also. :)

  87. Re:It basically bypasses all of the Windows securi by sjwest · · Score: 1

    Hell i want one, no more uac prompts in Vista. This would be a benefit too all sa's if they had one.

  88. "should be able to do" by Animaether · · Score: 1

    make sure to read that both ways... not only should a computer-savvy person be perfectly capable of doing this, there shouldn't be anything in the way to STOP them from doing this. They SHOULD be able to do this. Being able to access a drive's contents externally can save your ass if you hose the O/S / boot sector / whatever. Getting around basic password systems that are only meant to prevent unauthorized access when already in the same system is something that is -by design-. If you don't want the contents available even if hooked up to a secondary machine, or even to forensics, then you should encrypt the thing (keeping in mind that if you then screw something up, you may be SOL.)

  89. Mod parent up by WiglyWorm · · Score: 1

    Hit the nail on the head, even when not using the heart-string tugging example of child porn. If the polive have physical posession of your computer, that means they have already secured a search warrant and have every right to get in to your computer and look through your stuff. And, frankly, they should. There is not a single privacy issue with this tool.

    1. Re:Mod parent up by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

      Well, I wasn't trying to be heart tugging. I didn't make up my story of the client that I turned in. I used the mention of it because it's a lot more widespread of a problem than anyone realizes and it's more often than not the reason behind a computer search warrant.

  90. Some COFEE info from an Australian L.E. Conference by d3ac0n · · Score: 3, Informative
    Google .DOC-to-HTML link

    Here is the original link if anyone wants it: http://scissec.scis.ecu.edu.au/wordpress/conference_proceedings/2006/forensics/Proceedings_Forensics2006.doc

    If you scan down about 15% of the way down, there is a blurb about COFEE mixed in with the rest:

    Computer Online Forensic Evidence Extractor (COFEE)

    In year 2006, inspired by WFT, Ricci Ieong started the development of Computer Online Forensic Evidence Extractor (COFEE) (Ieong 2006) COFEE uses batch script to manage a list of existing incident response tools and IT security tools volatile data forensics acquisition system similar to WFT, IRCR and FRED. But all the scripts, programs were stored on USB storage device before data acquisition.

    Instead of requesting users to key in the output directory, COFEE automatically redirect the output to the inserted USB storage device. With the automatic OS version detection and storage assignment scheme, Operating System dependent program will be automatically selected after the version detection. Investigator only needs to insert the USB storage devices to the target machine and click one to two buttons in order to start the data acquisition process.

    Another difference between COFEE with other live forensics toolkits is separation of the data acquisition procedures with the data examination procedures. In WFT, the report generation processes are executed immediately after the data acquisition process on the target machine. However, performing report generation on target machine may also alter the memory content in the target machine. As report generation does not necessarily be executed on target machine, therefore, only data acquisition programs, in COFEE, would be executed on target machines. All program selection, data examination and analysis processes would be performed on investigator machine.

    Besides, more forensics programs are supported by COFEE such as screen capture and password capture tools.


    Interestingly, this article if from 2006. So COFEE has been around for 2 years already. Fascinating that we are just hearing about it now.
    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  91. A search warrant is location specific... by lurking_giant · · Score: 1

    According to the article it can be attached to an actively networked pc allowing a search without rebooting, if this is true, they could access data in locations that they have do not have a search warrant for... right?

  92. Re:Some COFEE info from an Australian L.E. Confere by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

    Please excuse my typo. The article *IS* from 2006, not "if". I gotta proofread more carefully. (When are we gonna get an edit feature Slashdot?)

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  93. Life Imitates Art by franksands · · Score: 1

    Well, computer games are not exactly art, but anyway. In CSI:Hard Evidence, one of the tools you can use to gather evidence at the places you visit is a USB pendrive that can find "encrypted files" in any computer.

  94. Jesus Christ, will people STOP using Windows!!!! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    From TFA:
    The device contains 150 commands that can dramatically cut the time it takes to gather digital evidence, which is becoming more important in real-world crime, as well as cybercrime. It can decrypt passwords and analyze a computer's Internet activity, as well as data stored in the computer.

    Who the hell owns your computer? What happened top the 4th and 5th ammendment?

    This is totally unacceptable. Even using an "encypted volume" on Windows, I bet the password is stored in a format which will be decrypted by the tools on this device.

    I use Linux, and while my system is on a UPS, it is also on a switch that I can turn off quickly and my home volume is encrypted.

    Listen, in our browser history, regardless of how straight and narrow you may live, exists pictures and words that can be used against you in the court of public opinion. Even a recent picture by Fran Lebovitz of a 15year old girl on major news outlets could be called kiddie porn to the press.

    The police and government use terror and public destruction to intimidate would-be criminals or people who have the mind to speak against them. It is best not to have your personal data as something they can use against you.

    Just remember this:
    "If you give me six lines written by the most honest man, I will find something in them to hang him."
    Cardinal Richelieu (1585)

  95. Only goes to show ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This only goes to show just how insecure Windows is. Sure under Linux you can easily reset the root password on an encrupted drive, but that tool also will supply you with the passwords the people were using easily!

    I'd like to see a comparison of how easy a Windows vs Linux machine is to crask passwords without internet access or using a rainbow table.

  96. It's not just a password retrieval tool,... by dos4who · · Score: 1
    it also "contains about 150 commands" to make their job easier. In other words, the average law enforcement officer may not know where to look for internet cache files, but this tool could automatically fetch them for him/her.

    Since a computer (or the evidenciary data) has to be in pristine condition to stand up in a court of law, the current process is to make an identical, bit-by-bit exact copy of the drives and RAM, and examine those in a lab setting, apart from the suspect computer.

    I wonder if this little MS device follows those rules or is it invasive, and leaves tracks like regular commands would??

    --
    "Yes, I have a Disaster Recovery Plan. It's called my Resume"
  97. Money, Property Rights, Information, Government by irchans · · Score: 1
    Back when gold and silver coins were money and governments were absolute Monarchies, people would literally bury their money to avoid government seizure by greedy monarchs. Burying money is wasteful. Once property rights were recognized, people could safely put their money in banks. Those banks made loans and economies grew.

    Today, information is valuable. People and companies expend effort to protect their information. The more the government seeks access that information, the more people will expend resources to protect that information.

    This leads to waste.

  98. Just use TrueCrypt by Danathar · · Score: 1

    If you are really paranoid, use Truecrypt.

  99. First to ask? by fuocoZERO · · Score: 1

    WHERE DO I GET ONE????

  100. that was my reaction by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1

    who, other than the police, knows about and can use this?

  101. LOL!! by Noted+Futurist · · Score: 1

    "We're doing this to help ensure that the Internet stays safe."
    Bit like doing something to help ensure the sky stays filled with Unicorns, eh?

  102. Re: Just one more reason not to run Windows by cloakable · · Score: 1

    I'm all for protecting personal privacy, but if investigators are using these tools to comb through your PC, you don't need to stop using windows - you need to stop committing crimes.

    Because these drives won't get stolen and duplicated, so criminals can comb through your PC. Nosir.
    --
    No tyrant thrives when every subject says no.
  103. flamebait summary!! by __aamisb9940 · · Score: 1

    "Just one more reason not to run Windows on your computer." ...whaaat? oh come on...soo absurd, yet I bet the /. crowd just eats it up...

    A more realistic closing statement might be "Just one more reason to ensure you use encryption if you value privacy" - considerably more fair.

  104. Scaremongering to justify broken security by sherriw · · Score: 1

    The fact that there is an intentional back door, even if it's for 'law enforcement' purposes, means that all the Windows claims of security are meaningless. It's a pretend security.

    If I manufacture locks, and and put in a glitch so that it will unlock if you shake/tap it a certain way, then I'm not making a lock, I'm making a device 'similar to a lock'.

    God this pisses me off. How long until these devices end up on ebay? Or a knock-off gets out into the public's hands.

    Utter bs. I love that my Windows password is not one-way hashed. That's why my personal stuff I wouldn't want a thief to see is in a TruCrypt hidden volume. And this is also why I no longer bring my laptop with me when I cross the border into the USA. Stupid.

    1. Re:Scaremongering to justify broken security by argent · · Score: 1

      If I manufacture locks, and and put in a glitch so that it will unlock if you shake/tap it a certain way, then I'm not making a lock, I'm making a device 'similar to a lock'.

      Have you ever unlocked a locked door from the inside?

      Usually involves removing two phillips-head screws and pulling the lock mechanism out.

      Booting a computer from a thumb drive is like unlocking a locked door from the inside.

  105. Phew, don't see them for sale on eBay... by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    ...yet

    (Although it's amazing how many former coffee drinkers misspell coffee.)

  106. Re:Jesus Christ, will people STOP using Windows!!! by sherriw · · Score: 1

    I agree, but people won't move from Windows until the alternatives get a library of games/software comparable to Windows, and solve stupid issues like these:

    http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/28/012238

    I'm a techie/developer and even I find Linux confusing.

  107. One more reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you haters are so pathetic...

  108. To anyone who seems shaken by this... by BeanBagKing · · Score: 1

    It's nothing new. While other products might not be Microsoft made, there are tools out there. UBCD (Ultimate Boot CD) comes with a utility for blanking XP passwords (I don't know if theres one for Vista yet, but if not, there will be soon). I've used it to blank passwords on US Army Secret computers (FYI, I work for the army and had permission) that users had lost their password to, took me 10 minutes max. Windows isn't/hasn't been secure. While I shake my finger at MS for providing a back door to anyone that allows access to others data (and I'm sure it's only a matter of time until this gets leaked to a torrent site), it's not exactly groundbreaking.

    1. Re:To anyone who seems shaken by this... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Unix-like operating systems have been trivial to gain access to as long as you have boot media and physical access to the box (well, encrypted filesystems notwithstanding). I can't say that I blame Microsoft for this, since admins need to be given SOME way to fix broken servers. Hell if Windows were THAT secure we'd be bitching and moaning about having no way to fix other than reformat/reinstall.

      Furthermore if you have private data which needs to remain private in Windows, you can enable encryption on selected directories.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:To anyone who seems shaken by this... by BeanBagKing · · Score: 1
      I'm guessing that this tool also gives access to the windows encrypted directories, though I'm not exactly sure as I haven't had the chance to test it :P I'm not a security professional, so I can't comment on the security differences between windows and various *nix environments, but I do know that they are -somewhat- more secure, if for no other reason than because there's not widespread toolkits out there that simply allow you to remove and/or bypass admin passwords.

      Anyone that wants to truly protect your data, IMO, there's no better place to look than TrueCrypt, but even that can be circumvented with keyloggers. There's no perfect solution, just better, and I have to say Windows is probably at the bottom of the pile when it comes to security.

    3. Re:To anyone who seems shaken by this... by jimmyharris · · Score: 1

      The good news is that the latest versions of both Ubuntu and Fedora (they're the two distributions I use) both make it extremely simple to encrypt your partitions. Click "Encrypt partition", enter a password and then you're automatically prompted to enter the password at boot time.

  109. Honest, officer .... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... its not my computer. Some guy just ran through here a few seconds ago and handed it to me. I've never seen any of this Goatse stuff before.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  110. Of course..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this will show up on the torrents by next week!!

  111. Wake up and smell the COFEE. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    This is a very good thing for Linux and the Open Source community for the following reasons:

    Finally we have 100% proof that Microsoft have been lying all along when denying there is a security backdoor in Windows.

    Now we know beyond doubt that you just can't trust any Microsoft-developed security system to even be intended to be fully secure.

    This will ensure all worldwide military, and most (non-US) government departments will be obliged to migrate away from Windows and other Microsoft products simply for security reasons.

    The first big business bust made with evidence gained by COFEE will ensure the rest of the commercial world will shortly follow.

    1. Re:Wake up and smell the COFEE. by carnalforge · · Score: 1

      Nice subject ;) As for the rest ... in an ideal world maybe. I dont think in this one though

      --
      :wq!
  112. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when you are innocent and the thumb drive contains malware/spyware?

  113. The most obvious question... by LLKrisJ · · Score: 1

    ...How long before some hacker group gets their nefarious hands on this 'plugin'?

    OSS Community; Code me a viable alternative to Outlook and Office PRONTO, so I can use Linux! (And no, OO is no option, it is TeH SuX0000rrrZZ)

  114. So Lonely... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    Microsoft Helps Police Crack Your Computer

    Presumably Sting is helping the RIAA find illegal downloads of "Message In A Bottle"?

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  115. In related news... by tunapez · · Score: 1

    My 14yo neighbor kid did it in half the LEO's time using his $15 512mb USB loaded w/ Linux distro. We'll bring you more exciting revelations as they become available, STAY TUNED!

    --
    Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
  116. Re:It's OK, theyre doing it to keep the internet s by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

    The kids call it 'pwning' or 'fragging' these days.

  117. Microsoft Helps Police Crack Your Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Windows password cracker is *not* news.

    That Microsoft is *actively* aiding and abetting police cracking personal computers is news. (Spoonfeeding police the information and tools is a more apt description.)

    Does this crack BitLocker? Trusted Computing? Does the cracker work at the *hardware* level?

  118. Microsoft Security Device by CryptFiend · · Score: 1

    In all honesty, I don't know why it always ends up stirring an anti-microsoft apple/linux/unix fanboi debate. Every operating system is open to forensics, the fact microsoft threw a product together to help the police win cases with less effort or knowledge is a good thing. Who wants to go through the trouble of pulling out a hard drive, toss a write blocker, open encase/adftk etc and document a billion boring steps and try and stay awake doing long boring searches anyways. Who says lazy can't win!!!

  119. fuck the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUCK the POLICE!

  120. More security than privacy by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

    I really look at this as more of a security issue than a privacy one. I think its less about privacy because one would have to assume in order to place this device on your computer police would have to have the correct authorization (ie: a warrant). I'm more concerned about the security implications of a device that simply plugs in and extracts all that information. However, I guess this would require physical access to the machine, and generally speaking, once someone has physical access, you're done for anyway.

  121. One of many M$-CTC innovations of oppression. by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft USA and China Technology Center (CTC) working together to assure the states future. Eat your heart out Mother Russia (MR)! What M$ lacks in desirability will always be the need for Viagra free Corporatists'/Politicians' functionality!

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  122. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, the anti-MS fanboys are really running out of ammo.

    I also read Windows is compatible with more hardware then any other OS on the market. That's surely a security hole and a reason to run linux!

  123. Re:It basically bypasses all of the Windows securi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So pretty much all the USB drive has to do is turn on the computer.

  124. It's the thought that counts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, nobody is going to argue that it wasn't already easy to get the files off a Windows box when you have physical access to it. The part that makes this bad is that Microsoft intentionally added backdoors to their security features, and then gave the key to a whole bunch of people, without telling anybody. As a result, most home users and an awful lot of businesses are now using software with backdoors in it.

    Also, remember that only ONE key ever has to be lost, stolen, pirated, etc., for every Windows box in the world to have its security compromised. Considering how common data theft is these days, I'd bet that there's already more than one copy floating around. The chance that this stuff will eventually turn up in malware (if it hasn't already) is VERY high.

  125. Not M$ fault ?!?! Maybe, Maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just so every one out there knows... And I am in no way supporting or rejecting M$ on this matter. But it is a flaw in USB Security... Every Day Millions of people plug in an USB device, do their business, and pull out the device. No OS warnings or anything.

    Also the same in Linux.

    That being said I have a USB Device called Blackdog Linux. found here http://www.projectblackdog.com.

    This little guy is quite remarkable. When inserted into any USB port he fires up a functioning Linux Server complete with FTP and all the bells and whistles.

    Now the interesting thing about this is it could be configured to automagically transfer files from the host HD to virtually anywhere as the slave linux OS uses the host network for internet access. Heres the scary part of this... this can be done without notice to the user of the host pc.

    1. Re:Not M$ fault ?!?! Maybe, Maybe not by eof · · Score: 1

      Concur. TFA is ultimately nothing more than an illustration of how exploitable the trust model for USB device usage is. Though it pains me to say it, Linux is just as culpable on that front as Windows is.

  126. Slightly OT: Cerifications in general by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    I don't know how careful the NIST actually evaluates the items to be certified, but if it is anything like the ISO 9000 certification a previous employer of mine got there will be holes you can drive a truck through ;-)

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  127. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  128. Re:It's OK, theyre doing it to keep the internet s by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    Oh, you take me back to the good old days of Quake and Quake II when I ran the Springfield Fragfest site!

    I guess I did get killed over the internet. A lot! Damn but it's dangerous in here.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  129. What does this indicate about Slashdot quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's put all the amusing pokes and prods at Windows security aside for a minute, and be ruthlessly blunt:

    The moderator who posted this story is either:
    a) A complete idiot, effectively; hugely ignorant on the topic
    b) A troll
    c) All of the above

    Seriously, the article is (from the way it's represented on Slashdot) just absurd.

    Microsoft made a device to help law enforcement agencies extract data off computers under investigation? What's the big surprise? This is an obvious move for Microsoft, lest it want to look uncooperative with law enforcement agencies, or leave more territory up for grabs by non-Microsoft OS's and tools, as many posters have pointed out. I have no doubt Microsoft has helped law enforcement agencies extract data off Windows computers in the past, via providing technical expertise, this is clearly just the latest offering in this area.

    The quote "basically bypasses all of the Windows security" is pulled out of thin air, or maybe someone's rectum. After reading the article, the closest I can find to this quote is: "The device contains 150 commands that can dramatically cut the time it takes to gather digital evidence, which is becoming more important in real-world crime, as well as cybercrime. It can decrypt passwords and analyze a computer's Internet activity, as well as data stored in the computer."

    It has tools that can cut the time it takes to gather digital evidence? So does every Linux distribution out there, and 10-fold if it's aimed at the pentest (penetration testing) area.

    It can decrypt passwords? Possibly, there's numerous different hash's employed on Windows of varying strength. Frankly, I think it's more likely it just changes the passwords to something else (this is conjecture, but an obvious idea, and likely an easier solution).

    Analyse a computers internet activity? Well that's a real challenge. Mount the computers partitions, look at the browsers history and cache.

    Analyse data on the computer? As easy as above, if not easier. FAT32 has no file system level security at all. If it's NTFS, you'll bypass most security mechanisms anyway just by mounting under linux, or any other OS with NTFS support. The only feature I can think of that may create difficulty would be EFS (Encrypting File System), but I'm not sufficiently versed on EFS to really make an informed comment.

    So what's the bottom line? This story is pure, unfiltered, undiluted FUD.

    ALL computers that are physically accessible are potentially far more vulnerable to exploitation than when attacking from a remote source. The OS is more or less irrelevant. From what I've read, all this device does is get past basic, everyday Windows security by bypassing the OS. Not novel, not difficult, and something easily done on most Linux Live-CD's.

    So what would make this story interesting? As some people have said, a backdoor. Is this implied in the actual linked article? No. Is it likely? IMO, no. Why? Because if such a backdoor became public, the damage to Microsoft could potentially be gigantic and a PR nightmare of epic proportions. If such a backdoor was being used, I doubt they'd be distributing it in bulk to supposedly "More than 2,000 officers in 15 countries". Plenty of opportunity there to nab a device and get reverse engineering.

    Is this an angry border-line rant? Yes.

    But it's true AND it is obvious.

    Thanks.

  130. So many of you are missing the point of this by GodBlessTexas · · Score: 1

    First, whoever wrote that article has NO clue what the hell they are talking about. No set of tools for taking information about a live/running system is going to take the place of a full disk image and analysis by a tool like Encase. Furthermore, this sounds like nothing more than a set of tools for gathering information on a running system. Since most of the tools that digital forensics investigators utilize for live system analysis for Windows boxes were part of the Winternals suite that Microsoft acquired, I doubt this is anything all that special. I'll probably have access to one sooner or later, as I am a forensic investigator in the private sector with friends in the law enforcement world, and I'm not expecting anything earth shattering. But this article is clearly FUD written by someone who thinks computers are magic.

    --
    Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas...
  131. The title should be... by imyy4u2 · · Score: 1

    Police help Microsoft crack your Windows computer's competition.

  132. How to secure your drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrap as many coils of insulated copper wire as you can around the drive.

    If and when someone comes to get your data, switch this wire to 110ac right away. Not only will the magnetic field wipe your drive clean, it can also set the machine on fire.

  133. No, I don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Does anyone here NOT know how to pull all the data off a windows machine without a password?"

    You're not understanding the implication here. They can do it without rebooting. In otherwords, they plug it into a running windows machine and they can gain access.

    Otherwise there would be no point. You can always image the drive to make a perfect copy. This is better because *YOU NEVER KNOW*.

    Think of the implications here in terms of Microsoft's ability to get through any security, either remotely or via physical access.

  134. Much ado about nothing!! by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Sorry to attach this to your +5 post but I wanted this to get seen:

    http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2008/apr08/04-28CrantonQA.mspx

    From the ms press release:

    "COFEE, a preconfigured, automated tool fits on a USB thumb drive. Prior to COFEE the equivalent work would require a computer forensics expert to enter 150 complex commands manually through a process that could take three to four hours. With COFEE, you simply plug into a running computer to extract the data with the click of one button --completing the work in about 20 minutes."

    Its little more than an automated tool that can be run by 'joe-beat-cop' instead of sending a forensics computer expert along. It doesn't do anything that couldn't already be done.

    This all... MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING!!

  135. Windows doesn't help protect, it violates you. by HermMunster · · Score: 1

    To be honest the reason why anyone would use Linux in face of such an incredible disclosure would be because they value their privacy. I've been saying for the past couple years that privacy is important no matter what.

    With Ubuntu (or Linux in general) you aren't going to be making it easier for a company such as Microsoft to build such a tool which can and will be abused more than you can possibly imagine.

    With Linux the privacy is protected by disclosure. You disclose your coding so that millions of eyes can see it. No surprises can crop up for this sort of thing because people have seen the code. No special facilities will be built that will allow companies to allow other entities undisclosed access to your computer.

    I don't want to hear the shit about how if you aren't guilty you shouldn't be worried. That's absolute bullshit. You protect your privacy to keep others from invading your privacy in the future.

    With Microsoft Windows you have your privacy violated all the time (especially in Vista). You let this go and down the road you are probably going to find more nefarious aspects to that privacy violations such as the ability of the federal government to invade undetectably into your computer.

    It is my right to say what is disclosed about me and what I say to others in private conversation. Our laws were written to put the burden on the government to prove their cases and our laws are there to permit us to protect ourselves against self incrimination. These are there to keep government agencies from misusing their power, which happens regularly.

    You give up your privacy today you give up your children's privacy tomorrow and they may not feel the same way about it as you do. And consider that our federal government has been monitoring all electronic and digital communications for some time without warrants is just one aspect of you allowing them to do it because you feel you have nothing to hide. Well, the vast majority of American's don't have anything serious to hide, but that's not enough reason to justify this blanket ability to invade

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  136. BORDER PATROL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if Microsoft is willing to give this device to police i'm pretty sure they would give it to the feds. Thus negating the possibility of not telling a border patrol officer your login password for your laptop.

    http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/90325

  137. We torture people now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they really want to know what's on your hard drive, your choice of operating system will matter less than your ability to hold your breath.

  138. Re:Some COFEE info from an Australian L.E. Confere by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would hate an edit feature. That is what proofreading is for. Once you commit your post that should be it. I can't tell you how many times I've been in forums that allow editing of posts and suddenly I don't know what anyone is talking about simply because I showed up late. One person makes a comment, other people discuss, then that person edits his post to something else.

    Not only that, it would be horrible for avoiding the trolls. All they would need to do is get a +5 informative on a post then edit it to be a link to a virus filled site or something else.

    --
    Stop Global Warming!
    Just say no to irreversible processes!
  139. "Just one more reason not to run Windows" by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

    Or just one more reason not to commit crimes.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  140. Where can I find that distro? by Obstin8 · · Score: 1

    Do you know if this distro is available publicly? I'm really interested in it because by default it blocks write access to IDE devices. Would be a great help in rescuing disks (something I do too much of sadly).

    1. Re:Where can I find that distro? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      All my googling only turned up the original article and a ubuntu forum where helix at http://www.e-fense.com/helix/ was mentioned as similar. All I can suggest is looking up the named developer on the Edith Cowan Uni website and contacting him.

    2. Re:Where can I find that distro? by Obstin8 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the Helix link, dbill. That'll work just fine.

  141. You sick bastard.... I like it... by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    Great thougth! In my case, the comp is setting next to the only escape route (the window) and if the guy actually got away (having to jump over the 21" monitor and out the window) he would be seriously injured!

    Whats the ignition point of thermite? Maybe I can sandwich it betwen the proc and heatsink, and just turn off the fan in software to ignite it!

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  142. Minimum of multiple layers. by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    Allways zipcrypt with a plausible deniability folder. For instance, I work in a field where occasionally I have to have demographics on my comp. so, I encrypt a file, called *demographics.zip in it I put ... wait for it.

    Demographics!

    Then one tiny file is actually a textfile attached to an encrypted zip file with a txt extension. If you open the text file, it looks like text, for the first 30 or so pages, and then it looks as if it's corrupted. Yank your text, rename file, open, enter password, ahh 20G of pron is safe from wife.

    Unless she sneaks up behind you, in which case your sol. Luckily for me, she just asks why I keep opening Mr. Andersons file.

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  143. Third party HDD encryption! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1
    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  144. Not a big deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked with the tool at one point. Its just a collection of already existing tools that allow some access to info without a reboot. You should look up other forensic tools and see what are out there, because what MS has provided is nothing new. Both EnCase and AccessData provide tools that can run from a thumb drive, dump your ram, and dump your HD to another device. They also have the ability to mount and browse your registry, hard drive (from images), and carve out info from your deleted files, as well as crack passwords.

    In short, this isn't anything that they can't already do

  145. "Just one more reason not to run Windows..." by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "Just one more reason not to run Windows on your computer."

    Yup, as once that tool is hacked/stolen into software and available on a USB drive, there won't be one computer that's safe.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  146. I love the passive aggressive whining at the end.. by thepainter · · Score: 1

    "...in order to eliminate all that pesky privacy when the police have physical access to your computer." Sorry, but the Search Warrant is what eliminates all your "peaky privacy", not something from Microsoft. And before you even think of the word "Patriot Act", any agency utilizing that act to search doesn't need anything from Microsoft. Believe it or not, criminals use computers too, and smaller agencies can use all the help they can get.

  147. Collecting evidence with proprietary software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a dumb fucking idea to collect evidence with proprietary software.

    Theoretically, a proprietary forensic software like this could be used to produce fake evidence and frame innocent people?

  148. Re:Some COFEE info from an Australian L.E. Confere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    edit should reset the score

  149. Re:Some COFEE info from an Australian L.E. Confere by shiftless · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, this article if from 2006. So COFEE has been around for 2 years already. Fascinating that we are just hearing about it now.

    You must be new around here.

  150. Re:Some COFEE info from an Australian L.E. Confere by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    Edit should also be limited to a short time period.

  151. dont be stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, well in the first place any unencrypted data is just stupid. So dont be stupid.

    Encrypt using PGP (public domain), free, http://www.pgpi.org/. Yeah its from 2002, but it still works. Access to this site may be blocked by your ISP or your gov't network.

    Other tools exist, including not-free, such as the "improved" PGP product from here, http://www.pgp.com/downloads/desktoptrial.html

    But if you go with the "improved" PGP product, you may want to read this first: http://securology.blogspot.com/2007/10/pgp-whole-disk-encryption-barely.html

    Other options exist, including:
    http://www.cypherix.com/cryptainerle/
    http://www.truecrypt.org/
    http://www.drivelock.com/
    http://americas.utimaco.com/safeguard_easy/

    Among Others.

    My personal favorite, however, is to disk-encrypt an external drive, one which connects via USB or FireWire, and which is NOT connected to the desktop or portable 99% of the time, and never when on-line. That is, whenever online, ensure the external drive is unplugged, and whenever the external drive is plugged in, ensure the network connection is unplugged - Not Just Disabled. Air Gaps are hard to hack remotely.

    For most usage, I use a desktop machine with a removable boot disk. Such as:
    http://www.startech.com/item/drw115atabk-Black-Professional-ATA-133-Drive-Drawer-with-Shock-Absorbers.aspx
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2000150043+50001849&name=Athena+Power

    This way, the box is the same, and I just rotate specific boot disks for specific purposes. With different encryptions and access methods and passwords. Often, the other boot disks are in a different location than the desktop machine. I find that I need several disks, such as "Business", "Research" (web browsing), "Gaming" and so on. Thus when I am playing an online game, there is zero chance that my business data is being hacked as it is physically on a different disk, that is on a shelf, and is not in the machine. The online gaming community is full of hackers and hacker wanna-bes. Anyone playing an online game should assume their machine contains keyloggers and screen capture tools, and probably also has a proxy on it that remote-broadcasts everything one does on that machine including screen shots every five seconds using the built-in microsoft image service.

    Its worth mentioning that if one uses the exact same disk in different trays for different boot disks, having the same size, same vendor, and bought at the same time, most machine identification systems will believe that only a single disk is in use, via remote sensing, if it ever comes to that.

    Of course, my financial data and health care data is never on a machine that is ever online. For that I use an old clunker machine, never updated or patched, never online, and backed up weekly to an external drive and cd-roms.

    As for online-banking and online-healthcare, well, these solutions are really really really very very very profitable for the Banks and the Health Care providers. They are also very much unsecured. Oh, wait, the server can be secured, yes. However, unless you are using a CISCO VPN, with a random key encryption, the data flow to the server, and from the server back to you, is not secured. Nor is your desktop, laptop or handheld machine secured. Many of these systems require encrypted pages to be saved to your hard disk. These can easily be retrieved and unencrypted days, weeks or even months later. Few people clean these "temporary" files. None of these online systems, with the exception of the above mentioned Cisco VPN, with random key encryption (requires a small stand alone device into which you enter a number or password) can be considered even partially secure. Online Banking just is not secure. Online health care and insurance systems are simply not secure. You are placing your financial, personal, or health care data at risk by using these systems.

    And you agree to this risk of loss, in the fine print, of the user agreements for all of t

  152. What about firearms? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    And those same agencies use weapons that they might not want civilians to own.

    1. Re:What about firearms? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Certainly the NSA doesn't. I'm not sure about the FBI.

      You're making a slippery slope argument. Next you'll be claiming that those agencies also have books that they'll make illegal. Gun regulation is fairly tough to get passed, and guns are directly involved in a considerable amount of violent injury and death.

    2. Re:What about firearms? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      True enough, but they may make such arguments against certain kinds of software as well.Remember the clipper chip?

    3. Re:What about firearms? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      I remember how successful that was.

  153. CAN not WILL by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    "It also eliminates the need to seize a computer itself, which typically involves disconnecting from a network, turning off the power and potentially losing data. Instead, the investigator CAN [emphsis added] scan for evidence on site."

    Regardless of which, they will still disconnect and confiscate. They will follow the tenet "You don't let the murder keep the gun", ignoring the fact that they're depriving the (gun/computer) owner of ownership rights despite not having shown that the person and/or particular device was actually involved in any wrong doing. Remember Steve Jackson's G.U.R.P.S Cyberpunk vs. the Secret Service? There's been a great deal of progress in clone-imaging the machines since then, but they still confiscate. Making it even more unnecessary will not stop it, because law enforcement seek as much as possible to inflict punishment in its attempt to leverage a guilty verdict against the guilty. In the process they fuck the innocent over because their violation of ownership rights happens outside the venue of judicial oversight and remains allowed even when placed in that venue.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  154. Re:Some COFEE info from an Australian L.E. Confere by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    So COFEE has been around for 2 years already. Fascinating that we are just hearing about it now. Nah. The facinating part will be the dupe /. post two days from now where everyone will freak out all over again about this MASSIVE SECURITY BREACH OMG!!! PONIES!!!

  155. DM-Crypt and the Fully Encrypted Root Parttion by felixdzerzhinsky · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu Hardy Heron using the alternative installer allows full disk encryption with a passphrase during the install. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=873&num=1 Debian has had this since Etch I think. Slackware and SUSE also have a good set of docs on how to set up full disk encrytion. Not as easy as Ubuntu or Debian though. Actually it is more a fully encrypted root partition. The /boot needs to unencrypted to function. You can use an integrity checker to ensure this is not tampered with. There is no excuse in 2008 for not using encryption. And use a real operating system. Not Windows!

    --
    "Flags are bits of colored cloth that governments use first to shrink-wrap people's brains..."
  156. We needed reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...not to use Windows?