Slashdot Mirror


Alternatives to Daylight Saving Time?

Wellington Grey writes "Daylight saving time almost upon us. The arguments about its possible benefits and drawbacks come up twice every year. Does it save energy or lives? Possibly, but it does definitely cause a great deal of inconvenience. My question is this: what do you think would be the best possible system to replace DST with? What is the best way for humans to deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year and still foster coordination over disparate time zones?"

755 comments

  1. Let's just use Zulu time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...and be done with it. Semper Fi! Oooh-rah! Gung-ho, Gung-ho, Gung-ho, sir!

    1. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by IcephishCR · · Score: 1

      OH YEAH!

      --
      Life is but a Beta test...
    2. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by bb5ch39t · · Score: 1

      Totally agree! And, if we go ultimate "green", we can all live in caves and not be dependent on the silly sun light, anyway.

    3. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, I think we should use Swatch Internet Time. Did you know that sales of Swatch Internet Time watches doubled between 1998 and 1999? If these trends continue, the lame 12-hour and 24-hour clocks will go the way of the dinosaur.

    4. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 3, Funny

      I see what you did there: Twice nothing is still nothing! Genius!

    5. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by bcat24 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you know that sales of Swatch Internet Time watches doubled between 1998 and 1999?

      So they sold eight instead of four?

    6. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny

      Disco Stu spins his disco disks to Internet Time, so should you, baby.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    7. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck that, and fuck Swatch, the satellite thieves.

      Their "internet time" watches suck too. UTC (Zulu time) would serve the purpose better.

    8. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by omnipresentbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Ten percent of nothin' is, let me do the math here... nothin' and a nothin', carry the nothin'..."

    9. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that sales of Swatch Internet Time watches doubled between 1998 and 1999?

      You mean they went from selling one to selling two?

    10. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Yay, Firefly! *Goes back to watching Dr. Horrible*

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    11. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'd rather vote for Decimal Time

    12. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeh, sales doubled from 3 units to 6, woohoo!
      def: swatch, n.: swiss plastic.

      Zulu time - its now two assegais past a grass hut.

    13. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by shtychkn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We should. Either way you have to do the math to figure out what time it is at the Dell help desk in India.

      I like how they are doing us a favor by helping "humans to deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year".

      Didn't we evolve on this planet? Shouldn't we probably be used to it by now?

    14. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      It's a good idea. All that would be required is that we get a bit more thoughtful about a daily routine - when you're on a flexible working pattern, who cares what the clock says? And on the plus side, means less traffic congestion.

    15. Re:Let's just use Zulu time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to suggest that, maybe formulated differently though. Something along the line: "UTC is the way to go".

  2. Firts Post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move everything 30 minutes, problem solved

    1. Re:Firts Post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zero minutes in Newfoundland.

    2. Re:Firts Post... by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I agree! I've said this for years.....just make sure you do it when we Fall-back so that we get the extra sleep.....

      Layne

    3. Re:Firts Post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you totally convinced me: tagged ohnoesslownewdayagain

  3. Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We don't do DST in John McCain country.*

    *Unless you're an Indian, in which case you might.

    1. Re:Move to Arizona by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I grew up in AZ - moved to a state that does daylight savings a couple years ago. I hate it. I never felt any lack for not having it or thought, "Gee, I wished we messed with the clocks twice a year."
       
      We should replace it with nothing. Just eliminate it. It would simplify life at no cost.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Move to Arizona by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear. I grew up in Indiana which recently switched (And I moved to Illinois). After 2 years it still twists my head around trying to think if I'll get more light now or less or when is 'savings time' and when is 'normal' now that 'savings time' is the majority of the year.

    3. Re:Move to Arizona by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry, once the government has adopted something you can't get rid of it. You can change it for better or worse (usually worse) but it is there for ever.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Move to Arizona by szark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry, once the government has adopted something you can't get rid of it. You can change it for better or worse (usually worse) but it is there for ever.

      Like Prohibition?

    5. Re:Move to Arizona by Wicked+Zen · · Score: 1

      Yup. Like most silly things, the best alternative is to just ignore it.

    6. Re:Move to Arizona by internerdj · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We should replace it with nothing. Just eliminate it. It would simplify life at no cost. While I agree it should be replaced it wouldn't be at no cost. 4 years ago I got tired of being late after the time switch so I bought a clock that got the time over the radio. Great right? Till two years ago when the idiots in Congress said lets change it by two weeks for no reason whatsoever. Then I had a clock that was wrong 4 times a year instead of two, because I forgot on the new date to change timezones and then it auto changed two weeks later. I had to buy a new clock after two years of that. I can't imagine how much software out there has all the daylight savings switches in the source. Even if it is just a patch someone has to update all the machines not connected to the rest of the world.

    7. Re:Move to Arizona by kramulous · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hate it also. I live in Queensland, Australia and we don't do daylight savings. The southern part of Australia, Sydney and Melbourne do have it and constantly complain that we don't. See, they are the centre of the universe and because they do, we must.

      Never mind that we live closer to the equator, it is bloody hot outside during the day and who on earth, apart from tourists, want to go out in that sun in the middle of the day. It burns!

      I'm an early riser. I get up hours before I have to go to work. That's when I clean and shit, so when I come home I can chillax. Many do the same. If you want daylight savings so you can see more daylight, adjust your own clock.

      --
      .
    8. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, dude, Indian is not the preferred nomenclature. Native-American, please.

    9. Re:Move to Arizona by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1
      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    10. Re:Move to Arizona by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      Sure, just ask NORML...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    11. Re:Move to Arizona by dosius · · Score: 1

      They ditched the Sunday morning blue law here in NYS just recently. THANK GHED.

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    12. Re:Move to Arizona by NotNormallyNormal · · Score: 1

      I live in Saskatchewan and we don't do DST here either - apparently "for the farmers" though I don't know how true that is. Problem with not switching is that businesses always have to ask me - are you on the same time as us or not? It tends to throw off the whole delivery schedules to other provinces and state that change... not to mention the TV schedule ;)

    13. Re:Move to Arizona by szark · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's on a state/local level though. Prohibition was federal. I'll admit that it's extremely difficult to get rid of something the government has adopted, but it isn't impossible.

    14. Re:Move to Arizona by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Just to keep the thread non-partisan, I should point out that they don't do DST in Barack Obama's birthplace of Hawaii, either.

    15. Re:Move to Arizona by evanbd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, now we have the new Prohibition, in the form of the War on Some Drugs. Except this time around they decided they could do it without an amendment.

    16. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: What's more pathetic than a trash-talking Anonymous Coward?

      Not realizing that you're just as anonymous

    17. Re:Move to Arizona by Golddess · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I bought a clock that got the time over the radio [...] I forgot on the new date to change timezones and then it auto changed two weeks later

      If it got it's time from the radio, why would you need to set anything at all? I would think that any radio transmissions should be local enough that it would be sending the correct time for that region regardless of the time of year.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    18. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A comment indicitive of someone who lives relatively close to the equator. For those of us who see a 6-12 hour difference in the number of daylight hours it can make a real difference.

    19. Re:Move to Arizona by AusIV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I suspect that you'll get something like GMT from the radio transmissions, and the clock itself adds however many hours it needs to get to the present time zone and to consider daylight savings time.

    20. Re:Move to Arizona by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can change it for better or worse...

      Random Daylight Savings Time!
      Are you late? Are you early?
      You'll never know unless you consult the weekly publication:
      "RDST: How Government Controls Daylight, and Why You Must Obey"

    21. Re:Move to Arizona by floateyedumpi · · Score: 5, Funny

      I never felt any lack for not having it or thought, "Gee, I wished we messed with the clocks twice a year."

      That's because the one thing you absolutely don't need to conserve in the sun-baked 115 degree desert of southern Arizona is..... daylight.

    22. Re:Move to Arizona by cylcyl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry, once the government has adopted something you can't get rid of it. You can change it for better or worse (usually worse) but it is there for ever.

      In that case, since they keep extending the DST anyway (it's ~7 months now), why not extend it to year round.

      Maybe we'll keep Feb 29 on "standard time" because we can't "get rid of it"

    23. Re:Move to Arizona by weierstrass · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just everyone use GMT (UTC) and get used to it. What is the point of timezones anyway? Oh, you like that it's 12 in the middle of the day and in the middle of the night. So what. Get over it. It's going to happen eventually anyway.

      --
      my password really is 'stinkypants'
    24. Re:Move to Arizona by jabithew · · Score: 1

      That's great in Arizona. It's not so great in Scotland.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    25. Re:Move to Arizona by billstewart · · Score: 1

      Russell Means's comment on that was "we always called ourselves Indians"...

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    26. Re:Move to Arizona by electrictroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >>>What is the best way for humans to deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year

      The electric lightbulb. Specifically a 5 watt compact fluorescent. It's amazing how I can pretend it's daytime even when it's 4 a.m. in the morning. A marvelous invention, and I no longer care if the sun is up or not, and DST is irrelevant.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    27. Re:Move to Arizona by iamdrscience · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep, WWVB, the main station used by radio clocks in the US broadcasts in UTC, all time zone and daylight savings adjustments are done by the clock which is why you have to set a time zone when you first buy one.

      This makes sense too because the radio station is used all over the country and neither it, nor your clocks have any way of knowing where you are.

    28. Re:Move to Arizona by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      We've still got prohibition. Just not booze. Well.. and booze, too...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    29. Re:Move to Arizona by unixfan · · Score: 1

      No, no. This is not insightful. It is FUNNY!

    30. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They aren't native to america - they just got here before the europeans did.

    31. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it the case in Indiana that before they switched entirely to DST, the decision of whether to operate on DST was decided by county? Thus during certain times of the year, what time it was would depend on which county you were in at the time? Whatever your opinion of DST, it's got to be better than that bullshit.

    32. Re:Move to Arizona by LandDolphin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Apparently I need to acquire a lawn. Because words like "chillax" really annoy me. Did chill somehow need san "ax" at the end? A hybrid of two words (Chill and relax) that already mean the same thing where the hybrid is longer then both of the original words is just annoying as all hell.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    33. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you think any lightbulb, especially a compact flourescent is in any way comparable to sunlight then I suspect you're an itinerant basement dweller and in fact haven't seen the sun in years (if ever).

    34. Re:Move to Arizona by phoomp · · Score: 1

      Don't most of these auto-DST-switching devices have an option to turn off the auto-DST-switching, to support non-DST locals?

    35. Re:Move to Arizona by hugecabbage · · Score: 1

      Also, dude, Indian is not the preferred nomenclature. Native-American, please.

      Depends on which Indians you ask. Some tribes actually prefer "Indian" over "Native American." The Plains Indians are a group that immediately come to mind.

      --
      oO0Oo
    36. Re:Move to Arizona by uberjack · · Score: 1

      Reverend Lovejoy: Once something's legalized by the government, it's no longer immoral.

    37. Re:Move to Arizona by uberjack · · Score: 1

      This isn't the guy who built the casino's here...

    38. Re:Move to Arizona by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, once the government has adopted something you can't get rid of it. You can change it for better or worse (usually worse) but it is there for ever.

      Like Prohibition?

      No, like the metric system.

    39. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      There used to be some counties in Indiana which bordered Ohio (and the part of Kentucky in the Eastern zone??) that were in the Eastern time zone, like the rest of indiana, but observed daylight saving time unlike the rest of Indiana. An example were the Indiana counties that contain Cincinnati suburbs. This isn't something that happened all around Indiana (and doesn't seem more confusing than states which straddle two time zones, which there are 10 or so of).

      (There are still some counties in Indiana that border states in the Central time zone (Illinois, some of Kentucky) that observe Central time, including DST.)

    40. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      We don't need to know when you shit.

    41. Re:Move to Arizona by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      You're actually wrong. Until they changed it, the law was Eastern time with no DST. But several counties close to big cities in other states (namely Chicago and Cincinnati) defied this law for obvious reasons. And the state just kind of turned a blind eye, for equally obvious reasons. And yes, I grew up in Indiana as well and thoroughly despise DST. It needs to go the way of the dodo, seeing as how it's a lot more useless now than... well, pretty much anything, ever.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    42. Re:Move to Arizona by NickDngr · · Score: 1

      While I agree it should be replaced it wouldn't be at no cost. 4 years ago I got tired of being late after the time switch so I bought a clock that got the time over the radio. Great right? Till two years ago when the idiots in Congress said lets change it by two weeks for no reason whatsoever. Then I had a clock that was wrong 4 times a year instead of two, because I forgot on the new date to change timezones and then it auto changed two weeks later. I had to buy a new clock after two years of that.

      You just had a dumb clock. WWVB (the source of the time broadcast) has a DST bit in the signal. If your clock was calculating the DST dates on its own and getting it wrong then it was just poorly designed.

      --
      Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
    43. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "an itinerant basement dweller and in fact haven't seen the sun in years (if ever)."

      Are you imagining a series of tubes that connect basements together that this guys moves between? I'm not sure how he can be an itinerant basement dweller without going outside otherwise.

    44. Re:Move to Arizona by jmorris42 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      > In that case, since they keep extending the DST anyway (it's ~7 months now), why not extend it to year round.

      Actually the US already tried year around DST. There is no good argument for DST but it won't die.

      Because there is ONE thing it does, especially this last change. It makes Democrats feel better about themselves. So long as they can pass bills like DST and reafirm that they are smarter people, better people, more caring people than those ignorant pieces of crap they rule over then it is always worth it. This last extension was to save energy. Studies showed at the time it was unlikely to do anything of the sort but who cares about facts, those are for losers. The only fact that mattered was that Democrats could feel smug and superior, safe in the knowledge that a YES vote proved they were better people who care about saving the Earth.

      Yes, the above is flamebait. :) DST really pisses me off, what kind of arrogant 'tard thinks they can order the sun around.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    45. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's when I clean and shit

      I think I speak for everyone when I say we would rather not know about your bowel movements.

    46. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clearly, not all signals are transmitted in UTC though. as i have an old timex "internet messenger" wrist watch i still use. and before congress decided to screw over the dates, i emailed timex about my watch. since it gets its time from some broadcast signal (pager network i think, since its a pager). and they said i wouldnt have to do anything.

      and indeed, they were correct. even now my watch correctly changes with DST/ST. shame more watches dont have such a simple feature really. as it even auto-changes when i cross time zones.

    47. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree... I have always lived in a state that uses daylight savings (CA), and have thought that it is just another way for "the man" to control our reality by forcing us to change our clocks twice a year. (well ok, I haven't always thought this way... when I was a kid I wasn't as jaded)

    48. Re:Move to Arizona by jubei · · Score: 1

      I also used to think that GMT might be sufficient, but, really, it is not.

      Local time is useful when knowing when something occurs in relation to apparent position of the sun, which is still how most people order their days. It helps us know when businesses are likely to be open, when it is rude to call people, and helps to deal with countless other cultural expectations.

    49. Re:Move to Arizona by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, while WWVB does send UTC time, it also sends a 'daylight saving time status' code.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWVB#Modulation_Format

      --
      ~ Aero
    50. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STOP SCREWING WITH YOUR CLOCKS!!!
      Spring forward and Fall back is a sham, so what if it's dark when you get up for school, boohoo.
      20 years in AZ and I still can't figure out if it's too late to call Mom on the East Coast...is it 9pm there or is it 10?

      PS: Yeah Mom, it IS 5am here. /click

    51. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - get rid of it - DST is a useless and stupid idea.

      The best thing to do is get an alarm clock if you want to get up earlier than usual for a while!

    52. Re:Move to Arizona by Hutz · · Score: 1

      This is easy -- soon we will extend it enough that the two halves touch. We'll just "Spring Forward" at some point and never fall back.

      Sure, Local Noon will be 1 hour before real noon, but this is a government program, right?

    53. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, but... When does it really make a difference? Near the solstice, if your daylight lasts close to 18 hours, does it really matter? Does it matter whether the sun sets at 9 PM or 10 PM??? Does it really make much of a difference to have the sun rise at 4 AM instead of 3 AM?

      At exactly what time of year would you really see a benefit to shifting those daylight hours? Right around the equinoxes maybe? Seriously, what's the case for having DST for 7 months during the sunniest part of the year, unless you live in that narrow band of latitude north of Arizona and south of Canada (or the equivalent southern latitudes)?

    54. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Indiana and recently we adopted DST. At first I resisted it like all change. After all, I never felt the need for it when I didn't have it.

      The main problem I have now is that it takes a week or so to adjust to the new schedule when it changes.

      On the plus side, I don't have to constantly wonder how many hours difference there is between me and someone in a different time zone. (Except that DST was extended last year and now everyone starts at a different time.)

    55. Re:Move to Arizona by noc007 · · Score: 1

      We should replace it with nothing. Just eliminate it. It would simplify life at no cost.

      THIS.

      DST just doesn't make any sense to me. I haven't come across a good reason for it yet. I was told once that it benefited farming to which my answer is "let them change their hours of operation semi-annually." Energy savings don't hold any weight either for me. Of the bathrooms that I've had, most didn't have a window and the ones that did had a very small BS window, so I am going to turn the light on anyways in the morning. Sunlight coming into any part of my residence wasn't the best either, so I'm going to turn the light on unless I wanted to take a nap.

      The changes to the DST schedule in 2007 was really BS. I haven't come across a report that actually said we didn't use X amount of energy or saved X millions of dollars as a result. If anything it was a complete waste of money and a royal PITA. IMHO the world spent more money getting all of our electronic crap ready than actually saving anything. Hell, we had the light on all night too because we were busting our butts to get everything ready in time.

    56. Re:Move to Arizona by koxkoxkox · · Score: 1

      Just move at night ...

    57. Re:Move to Arizona by Leebert · · Score: 1

      The electric lightbulb. Specifically a 5 watt compact fluorescent. It's amazing how I can pretend it's daytime even when it's 4 a.m. in the morning.

      Some of us go outside.

      (Mind you, I hate DST, but this is a specious argument.)

    58. Re:Move to Arizona by arekq · · Score: 1

      Simple. Eliminate it, but give it a new name. There, we have something new. :)

    59. Re:Move to Arizona by Leebert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ummm, WWVB has a "DST" bit. My WWVB-based clocks set DST correctly, even when Congress screws with it.

      http://tf.nist.gov/stations/wwvbtimecode.htm

    60. Re:Move to Arizona by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Random Daylight Savings Time!

      Already have that - but we call it "flex time."

      If they REALLY wanted to save energy, they'd go to the 4 day work week. 20% saving in gasoline used to drive cars to and from work.

    61. Re:Move to Arizona by misfit815 · · Score: 1

      Amen. I've lived in Indiana my whole life. We switched last year, and I absolutely hate it.

      --
      Jesus told him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. - John 14:6 NLT
    62. Re:Move to Arizona by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      I get up hours before I have to go to work. That's when I clean and shit, so when I come home I can chillax

      See, there's your first mistake. Tend to your bodily functions at work ... getting paid to read in the "library" at work is one of life's little pleasures.

      At 10 minutes a day, it's 41-2/3 hours a year. Think of it as an extra week's vacation, doled out in tine time slices.

    63. Re:Move to Arizona by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      The first time I went to Indiana, Notre Dame put my (at the time) fiancée and me up in a real hotel, and it was February (so they were on the same time as Michigan, where we lived). The second time I went to Indiana was when we were apartment-hunting in July. When we got to the motel, I thought it was about 11:30am. The clock in the room said 11:00. The waitress at the diner across the street gave us breakfast menus, which surprised us a bit.

      See, with DST, hotels have to set the clocks twice a year. This place apparently never adjusted the clocks, so after who knows how many years, it was half an hour fast. We didn't figure out that Indiana wasn't on DST until nearly 10:00pm.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    64. Re:Move to Arizona by zakureth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This might sound a little crazy but stick with me here:

      If the daylight hours are changing such that you are not getting daylight at times that best match your schedule: change your schedule, not the clocks.

      It's so crazy it could actually work...

      --
      Windows: The operating system built for the internet. Unix: The operating system the Internet was built for.
    65. Re:Move to Arizona by mezron · · Score: 1

      There are still quite a few dry counties here in the states, so yea the parent post is still mostly true in that regard.

    66. Re:Move to Arizona by RabidOverYou · · Score: 1

      I'm as nerdy as any of you, I hate DST, just get rid of it. But, here's a funny story. Ages ago, I went to Club Med on Bora Bora, in Tahiti. American tourist ranch. Club Med ran an hour off the rest of the island. It'd be 3pm at Club Med, 2pm down the street. Why? Because the idiot tourists would party 'late', wake up at 10am, miss out on all the great sunshine activities. They couldn't convince people otherwise, so they just redefined time, fooled them.

    67. Re:Move to Arizona by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      You'd still effectively have time zones, though. Humans for the most part like to wake up with the sun and go to bed when it gets dark. Sure, you could say, "Let's have that meeting at 1300" because for you, that's right after lunch. But if you had international clients on the phone you would still need to convert 1300 to what it 'feels' like in maybe Japan. I don't know if I'm explaining this right.

      Noon will always still be noon, whether you call it 1200 or 1800 or whatever, depending on where you are.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    68. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gg.

    69. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He's an Aussie. They nickname almost everything and have some killer slang that takes some getting used to.

      I spent some time in Brissie, which is probably where he's from. The first week I was there, I said "what?" just as many times as I had with a Honduran that had a thick accent and less than stellar command of English.

      After that first week, though, I had no problem understanding anyone in the area.

    70. Re:Move to Arizona by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      I somehow doubt you got fired for being an hour late one time on the day of the time change, unless you happen to work for someone who paid you a ridiculous amount of money to ensure you were on time, in which case you probably should have been waking up plenty early anyway to make sure other unexpected stuff wasn't a problem anyway.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    71. Re:Move to Arizona by Sniper98G · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Massachusetts and moved to Arizona when I was an adult. When I lived in Massachusetts, in the winter, it was dark when I got up and it was dark by the time I got home at night. Now that I live in Arizona I can't help but think; what the hell were those people thinking? I do not miss daylight savings time. THERE IS NO WAY TO SAVE DAYLIGHT; you get what you get. Alaska gets a 0-24 daylight swing; can anyone tell me if moving around the 4 hours of dusk they get in December makes them feel like they have more light? Probably not since they are trying to get rid of it on the 2008 ballot.

    72. Re:Move to Arizona by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I grew up in AZ - moved to a state that does daylight savings a couple years ago. I hate it. I never felt any lack for not having it or thought, "Gee, I wished we messed with the clocks twice a year."

      We should replace it with nothing. Just eliminate it. It would simplify life at no cost.

      Yeah, I wish everybody'd things my way too.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    73. Re:Move to Arizona by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      No, drugs are federal. In California, you can posses and even buy marijuana if you meet the requirements. That hasn't stopped the feds from stepping in on peoples rights. (same in Oregon as well)

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    74. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Booze is no longer prohibited. It has been changed. Other things are still prohibited AND booze is stil controlled.

    75. Re:Move to Arizona by et764 · · Score: 1

      I live in Seattle, which is far enough from the equator that we probably see at least a 6 hour variation in the number of daylight areas. My experience is that daylight savings makes it stay light way too late in the summer, and not nearly late enough in the winter. I'm in favor of getting rid of daylight savings time, but at the very least, the system we have now seems to be the exact opposite of what would be even remotely sane.

    76. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      Supposedly, this was done to increase retail sales because again, supposedly, studies have shown during DST the citizens of the USA purchase more goods. It's an added plus geeks in the USA will also be compelled to buy new auto-DST gadgets. It's kind of odd the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association and the National Association of Convenience Stores are messing with circadian clocks, but actually changing time to make more money.

      Someone please provide a compelling argument for it that can't be also achieved by getting up earlier. Arguments that rely on the communication needs of businesses are in-fact unfounded. The whole world doesn't start business at an agreed upon time. Businesses in the United States also don't all start up at an agreed upon time because we time zones.

    77. Re:Move to Arizona by lancejjj · · Score: 1

      Then I had a clock that was wrong 4 times a year instead of two, because I forgot on the new date to change timezones and then it auto changed two weeks later.

      You must have the same shitty clock I have. It is so poorly implemented that it ignores the DST status bit from the radio.... instead it switches DST based it on a statically-coded calendar rule. What kind of acid were these people on? WWVB has been around for a long time - with the DST bit - and the DST rules have changed many times before.

      I hate that clock. Piece of junk. I think they implemented it like that just so it would become obsolete after an arbitrary amount of time.

    78. Re:Move to Arizona by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Supposedly, this was done to increase retail sales because again, supposedly, studies have shown during DST the citizens of the USA purchase more goods.

      I'd like to see what data they were using in these studies, because correlation does not imply causation. DST happens in summer; people are more likely to go out and do things in warmer weather.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    79. Re:Move to Arizona by jbengt · · Score: 1

      IAJAWG (I Am Just A White Guy) but Hopi or Cherokee or Sioux or whatever is preferred.
      Indian or American Indian seems fine, though ambiguous, you might just be talking about someone from India.
      But a native American is anyone who was born in America, including me.

    80. Re:Move to Arizona by lancejjj · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I lived in Massachusetts, in the winter, it was dark when I got up and it was dark by the time I got home at night. Now that I live in Arizona I can't help but think; what the hell were those people thinking? I do not miss daylight savings time.

      Um, in the winter it's Standard time, not DST.

      DST kicks in the summer, pushing the clock such that sun rise is at 6 AM instead of 5 AM, and sets at 8 PM instead of 7 PM.

      In the winter, during standard time, the clock is set such that the sun is pretty much over head at noon.

    81. Re:Move to Arizona by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Actually, while WWVB does send UTC time, it also sends a 'daylight saving time status' code.

      It does, but the brain-dead implementation on our WWVB clock ignores it. It has a DST mode, but it just advances or retards the current time -- regardless of whatever DST flag is being broadcast.

      I'd like to find the engineer responsible (or his middle manager) and smack him. With the clock.

      Twice.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    82. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, like the Patriot Act.

    83. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if you look back at the previous comments it's obvious Sydney and Melbourne can't be the centre of the universe because we're not in the northern hemisphere.

    84. Re:Move to Arizona by swillden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thank FDR.

      His New Deal was being systematically shot down by the Supreme Court on the grounds that the Commerce Clause didn't justify massive federal intervention in the economy. He threatened to stack the deck by appointing six new justices (making the total 15) if needed to get his legislative agenda upheld. The Court caved and started supporting the New Deal and in the process set the precedent that the federal government can do whatever it damned well wants as long as it can imply some vague connection to interstate commerce.

      The current Court has been the first one to try to roll that precedent back a bit, actually striking down a couple of Commerce-based laws, but since Obama is going to win and appoint a Democrat or two to the bench, expect the all-powerful Commerce clause to be quickly re-established.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    85. Re:Move to Arizona by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      shh its more fun to watch them fight over dst than to point out that changing a clock twice a year isnt going to make anybodies head explode (well nobody that didnt vote for bush anyway)

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    86. Re:Move to Arizona by Darkk · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about this? Most of my clocks are based on "atomic time" via radio and are over 6 years old. They always sync perfectly, even with the DST dates have changed because the radio signal is based on actual time, not on dates.

      I too thought I had to replace those clocks but behold it's working perfectly with the changes.

    87. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like how we Americans will eventually use the metric system for more than just ammunition.

    88. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These internet tubes are amazing. This itinerant basement dwelling lifestyle wouldn't be the same without.

    89. Re:Move to Arizona by Michael+Snoswell · · Score: 1

      I was in Queensland a few weeks ago and it was wonderful except for the lack of daylight saving.

      The sun was shining in my hotel window at 5am in the morning and by 6pm it was dark!! So after work there was no time at all to sight see or enjoy the place and by 9pm (despite being the school holidays and the Gold Coast) the streets were pretty much empty.

      I prefer daylight savings so after work we can sit around in the evening sun and enjoy drinks and late dinners and walks on the beach. If I don't wake up in the morning till 7 or 7:30am then I don't want that sunshine wasted on thick, dark curtains when I could enjoy it at the end of the day.

      --
      pithy comment
    90. Re:Move to Arizona by kramulous · · Score: 1

      Fair point.

      Except that soon, the sun will be setting at 7pm, with light another 30 minutes after that. September and October are just an adjustment period.

      Everybody talks about wanting to do extra activities after work but, apart from people with kids, who *really* does that? Clearly demonstrated by nobody being out and about after 9pm. Daylight savings will not change this. It's a culture thing.

      Maybe it's because I grew up in the country. I set my body clock around daylight hours. I get extra sleep in winter while in Summer I get a lot more done. And the sun is extremely powerful during the day. I want to stay away from the peak UV periods as much as possible. You can get a sunburn with just one minute of exposure during these times: I don't want cancer scars covering my body. Look closely at people over the age of 40 on the Gold Coast.

      May as well talk about the Greenie thing while I'm at it. You can take a stab at the architecture of houses in Queensland; they're not built for retaining constant temperatures. What is better for the environment? Thousands of people at work in buildings built for retaining constant temperature with industrial water cooled air conditioning or thousands of people sitting in uninsulated houses with reverse cycle air conditioners going flat out?

      --
      .
    91. Re:Move to Arizona by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      replace it with nothing. Just eliminate it. It would simplify life at no cost.

      It should be replaced with one standard time everywhere.

      I don't have to worry that our companies both open at 8:00 AM, but you're on the east coast and I'm on the west coast, so that's um...uh....*google*...4 hours difference?

      Screw timezones. Your company can open at 8:00 AM on the east coast (when the sun comes up there), and I can open my company at 10:00 (when the sun comes up here). Everyone would quickly adjust to the new time. Instead of working 9a-5p on the west coast, you'd work 1p-9p....

      The whole problem is caused by the fact that we are changing the measurement of time instead of the amount of time.

      When I make pancakes, the recipe calls for 2 cups of flower and 1 cup of water. Not 1 cup of flower and 1 cup of water, but the 1 cup of flower is a different sized container we decided to also call 1 cup.

      Same thing with time. Stop setting time forward and back. Time isn't actually skipping forward or backward. Use the existing daylight savings dates as the days when some companies may or may not decide to start and end work an hour earlier/later.

      Time pisses me off.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    92. Re:Move to Arizona by Thornae · · Score: 1

      He's an Aussie. They nickname almost everything and have some killer slang that takes some getting used to.

      Yes we do, but I think most of us would still consider "chillax" to be a bloody stupid term.

      --
      |>
      Here be Dragons
    93. Re:Move to Arizona by willpall · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I couldn't resist replying to your sig. See, I have a 45-mile commute 1 way, and I travel along at 80 mph. I did the math and found out I save 7 minutes, 47 seconds vs. going 65 mph. So yeah, I have to pass that guy :-).

      --
      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.
    94. Re:Move to Arizona by mpe · · Score: 1

      and indeed, they were correct. even now my watch correctly changes with DST/ST. shame more watches dont have such a simple feature really. as it even auto-changes when i cross time zones.

      How does it manage that without GPS and a rather large database built in?

    95. Re:Move to Arizona by endrerud · · Score: 1

      I can see why you feel that way living in the US, but most of the people in the world live in another country than you. Here in Norway I see a huge benefit of DST. When I get up at 7 in the morning it's completely dark outside, and when I leave from work it's on it's way to become dark again.
      We are changing the clock again this weekend (one week(?) before you in the US) and it's going to help a lot in the mornings. Evenings will get even darker, but the hardest parts is always to wake up during the dark times. It's still going to be worse the next months (the days are getting 6 minutes shorter every day now), but DTS helps a bit.

      DST does definitely have it's place, but maybe not in every country of the world.

    96. Re:Move to Arizona by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      It's a pager, so it does it the same way cell phones do, from the time signal from cell phone towers.

    97. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      UTC?!!

      You sir, are a socialist! Probably even a COMMUNIST!
      If you are an American, excuse me, CLAIM to be one- you are probably gonna vote for that muslim terrorist Obama, who plans to enslave this great nation!
      Don't you know that in God-fearing America, the true path is STANDARD time? Eastern, Central, Mountain and Pacific! A great American invention!
      Why it's been in the Holy Bible for these last 6000 years, ever since the Dinosaurs died out!

      And only if the lesser breeds/heathen world would adopt this Christian American standard!
        But noooo.. they have to use this atheist metric crap, celsius whatever and your previously mentioned UTC!

      Why can't the world be more like us true Americans?

        - A patriot who believes in John McCain, Pinoqachole and God's ownstandard time!

    98. Re:Move to Arizona by Sobrique · · Score: 1
      The thing is, you don't get any extra hours of light by moving to DST - all it does is 'push' employers to basically alter your working pattern by an hour.

      If companies weren't so hung up on counting the hours that you work, then it would be entirely irrelevant. For starters most jobs above a certain level, productivity doesn't directly correlate to hours anyway. Also of course, most jobs it's irrelevant -which- 8 hours of the day you're working. Even the ones that require 'someone to be in' between certain hours (e.g. shops) it doesn't actually mean you need the entire shift ready to go on the dot. There's a few exceptions I'll grant. Places like assembly lines, or where there's similar kinds of time sensitive dependancies, but in the grand scope of 'possible jobs' I'd put that in at a relatively small fraction.

    99. Re:Move to Arizona by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that's a very good point. If you have less daylight than hours in work, no amount of daylight savings is going to help, as you're typically in work over solar noon. So clearly the logical solution is rather than 'daylight saving', is to move everyone to MAXIMUM DAYLIGHT where the standard working shift is 20:00 to 04:00. This makes it most likely that you will have daylight at a point when you're not at work. For convenience sake, it may be worth adjusting clocks by ... erm, about 12 hours. Or just tell everyone that 8pm is actually 8am now, and hope they don't understand the 24 hour clock.

    100. Re:Move to Arizona by Sobrique · · Score: 1
      If you're already local, you know when stuff opens and closes. If everyone was on UTC, then rather than look at timezone, all you'd need is to look up what time was noon.

      I'm getting used to international scheduling, and we do work in GMT, and just accept that we each need to convert locally based on our 'GMT pattern'. It's really not that bad.

      The counter argument though, is that relative timezones around the world don't actually matter to the majority of people in the world. They only care what time lunch is where they are.

    101. Re:Move to Arizona by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1

      For those of us who see a 6-12 hour difference in the number of daylight hours it can make a real difference.

      Wow, I didn't know that changing the clocks would actually affect the rotation of the earth.

      Rich.

    102. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations ... you are now officially old. How does it feel?

    103. Re:Move to Arizona by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``A comment indicitive of someone who lives relatively close to the equator. For those of us who see a 6-12 hour difference in the number of daylight hours it can make a real difference.''

      I don't see that. How does shifting the clock time by 1 hour offset 6-12 hours of difference in daylight?

      I live at 52 degrees latitude, in a country that does DST, and I hate it. It's not just people who forget about the clock change and show up an hour late or early. It's also the confusion that ensues from clock time not being continuous. And there's no way out...you can record times so that they are continuous, but then people get confused because the recorded time doesn't match clock time.

      Personally, I think DST is an abomination and should be abolished. And, while we're at it, let's think hard about time zones, too.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    104. Re:Move to Arizona by caluml · · Score: 1

      When I make pancakes, the recipe calls for 2 cups of flower and 1 cup of water

      If you make your pancakes with flower and water, I can't imagine they'd taste very good. A little too fragrant, I expect.

    105. Re:Move to Arizona by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      It would simplify life at no cost.

      No cost? You're not the one who would have to patch all our systems not to do DST any more. Personally, I wish they'd just quit fiddling with the damn thing.

    106. Re:Move to Arizona by DudeTheMath · · Score: 2, Informative

      The latest change took effect in 2007, which was passed in the Energy Policy Act of 2005; wasn't the 109th still a Republican-controlled Congress? You can also thank the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association and the National Association of Convenience Stores, who lobbied for it with their "More Corporate Welfare Now!" Republican buddies on the hill (okay, they probably also lobbied the Dems).

      Oh, and DST pisses me off, too.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    107. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that?
      I used to live near the equator, and I assure you the GPP is indeed Insightful.

    108. Re:Move to Arizona by grahamm · · Score: 1

      I was in Queensland a few weeks ago and it was wonderful except for the lack of daylight saving.

      The sun was shining in my hotel window at 5am in the morning and by 6pm it was dark!!

      In that case the timezone did not match the location. In the "correct" timezone, the sun is at its highest at noon. So there are equal periods of daylight before and after noon. So if it was light at 5am, then it should still have been light at 7pm.

    109. Re:Move to Arizona by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      I agree. I grew up with DST, and now live in Japan, which doesn't recognize it. The winters are exactly the same, and the additional light in the summer really doesn't make that much difference. (Although I do close the curtains on my east-facing bedroom window so that the 4:30AM sunrise in June doesn't wake me up).

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    110. Re:Move to Arizona by phision · · Score: 1

      Oh don't remind me please :)
      I had the chance to develop the time zone and DST functionality of a personal data and email synchronization software. This turned out to be nightmare.
      There are tons of different rules for the different countries, with exceptions here and there. There are countries that move their time half an hour, countries that change their rules way too often, and on the top of all the mess there are the Jewish rules, which use the Jewish calendar, and when you convert the date to the gregorian calendar they look totally random. So, the task to create a software that can convert times between different countries proved to be almost impossible. Maybe the clean way is to use the Olson database (and to update it often), but in my case this was impossible.

      After all the white hair I got from it I hate the daylight saving time :). There are countries that recently abandoned this legacy without bad consequences. I don't see the point of it in nowadays.

    111. Re:Move to Arizona by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      You think they got rid of it? Go build you a still and then make an anonymous call to your local ATF office. Get back to us with how long it takes for them to break your door down.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    112. Re:Move to Arizona by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I agree, the mexcians take naps at noon, in europe they close shops for 2 hour lunches to come back later and finish later...
      We could just adapt by changing our routine and not the law of physics.

    113. Re:Move to Arizona by mark-t · · Score: 1

      For devices that have embedded code to handle daylight savings time, the change is usually just as easy as setting a switch that tells the device not to utilize it. Devices with DST functionality invariably have some mechanism to turn it off because there are several places in North America that don't actually even utilize daylight savings time and to make different versions of the device for such areas would prohibitively increase their cost.

    114. Re:Move to Arizona by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Bipartisan malcontent here, and yes... it was republicans. And democrats. They're all idiots.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    115. Re:Move to Arizona by Aetrus · · Score: 1

      Do you really save that gas though? I don't think most of those people are just going to sit at home an do nothing. They're probably going to go shopping, go to Starbucks, and do errands. You're not really saving gas, just not going to work as often. Which I like, but that's beside my point.

    116. Re:Move to Arizona by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying McCain's out of touch, but he thinks GMT is a new truck from GM.

    117. Re:Move to Arizona by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Maybe DST served some point back in the day when clocks were the size of churches but now days you can get a clock the size of a nickle that will stay running for several years. We no longer have to rely on the sun telling us what time we have to be to work.

    118. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did he say he was fired?

    119. Re:Move to Arizona by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of a dinnertime conversation with my seven-year-old daughter recently. We were discussing good rules to live by, and she came up with, "Don't imitate idiots."

      We all had to agree that was a darned good rule. So I guess that means none of us can run for public office.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    120. Re:Move to Arizona by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      No, just not on the republican or democrat platform of idiocy.

      Campaign slogan: I'm not as much of an idiot as my opponent.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    121. Re:Move to Arizona by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      If you make your pancakes with flower and water, I can't imagine they'd taste very good. A little too fragrant, I expect.

      Damn--I should have made a car analogy...maybe something about gas tank sizes...hmm...

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    122. Re:Move to Arizona by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      It's late and you didn't provide any sources, so I won't either. The commerce clause has been invoked to cover absurd federal drug/culture war activities by the current administration. It was used in an attempt to fight California's emissions standards.

      You seem to be implying that the modern Republican Party supports a more equitable distribution of power between the branches or between the levels of government. They have consistently shown this to be false for the last 20 years. They support an expansion of executive power while they hold the executive. They support an expansion of federal power when they have a majority in congress.

      Further, I would argue that judicial support of new deal legislation came with the five justices appointed by FDR during his second term.

      Disclaimer: While I obviously dislike the argument I see you using, I also disagree with the prevailing interpretation of both the commerce and elastic clauses. I feel that an amendment should have been required to implement many of the New Deal programs. I also feel that many of those programs were a step in the right direction.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    123. Re:Move to Arizona by bhiestand · · Score: 2, Funny

      Random Daylight Savings Time!

      Already have that - but we call it "flex time."

      If they REALLY wanted to save energy, they'd go to the 4 day work week. 20% saving in gasoline used to drive cars to and from work.

      Way ahead of you! We're headed straight for the 0 day work week.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    124. Re:Move to Arizona by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Ever since I found out what Day Light Savings was about I was annoyed with it. And principally the same thing with different time zones. Why not just go off global time, that way whenever you see someone's business hours you know exactly what time they open and close, no special considerations about where they are or anything.

    125. Re:Move to Arizona by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Amen, time zones don't make any sense in a globally connected world as ours is today.

    126. Re:Move to Arizona by dwye · · Score: 1

      > We no longer have to rely on the sun telling us what time we have to be to work.

      Tell it to your circadian rhythms, bud.

      Not so far off with dropping DST as the other suggestion seen here that everybody shift to GMT. That puts a large portion of the world on second shift, or else everyone will ignore it in practice, like they do metric in the USA, or newtons and KPH on Top Gear (at least as I see it on BBCA).

    127. Re:Move to Arizona by meiao · · Score: 1
    128. Re:Move to Arizona by swillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's late and you didn't provide any sources, so I won't either. The commerce clause has been invoked to cover absurd federal drug/culture war activities by the current administration. It was used in an attempt to fight California's emissions standards.

      It certainly has been abused by every single administration/Congress since FDR.

      You seem to be implying that the modern Republican Party supports a more equitable distribution of power between the branches or between the levels of government.

      I said nothing at all to imply that, nor do I believe it. I was just lamenting the decision by FDR to apply political leverage against the theoretically non-political SCOTUS in order to disregard the Constitution, which made it possible for succeeding administrations -- including the current one -- to ignore the Constitution.

      Further, I would argue that judicial support of new deal legislation came with the five justices appointed by FDR during his second term.

      Eventually, yes. But he broke SCOTUS to his will even before then. Look up the Judiciary Reorganization of 1937, also known as the "Court-packing" bill. It was never passed, but its threat was sufficient to cow the justices.

      I feel that an amendment should have been required to implement many of the New Deal programs. I also feel that many of those programs were a step in the right direction.

      I disagree. New Deal-style social programs are fine, but they should be implemented at the state level. Such economic manipulation may (or may not) be necessary, but it's not an appropriate role for the federal government.

      We tend to think of the states as having insufficient fiscal resources for carrying out such programs, but that's only because the bulk of the tax revenues go to the federal government. Had we not made the mistake embodied in the 16th and 17th amendments, the states would have had the necessary resources. As a benefit, the states would undoubtedly have taken different approaches, which would have provided an ongoing set of parallel experiments to see which approaches work best.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    129. Re:Move to Arizona by boarder · · Score: 2, Informative

      The new DST extension was ushered in by a Republican controlled congress and heavily supported by Bush. It was part of a bill that subsidized US Energy companies, especially Texas firms (read the Wiki section on which politicians from Texas liked that part of the bill).

      At least you have a low UID. So you have that going for ya.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
    130. Re:Move to Arizona by Elky+Elk · · Score: 1

      welcome to the english language

    131. Re:Move to Arizona by Thornae · · Score: 1

      Congratulations ... you are now officially old. How does it feel?

      I might tell you when you GET OFF MY LAWN.

      --
      |>
      Here be Dragons
    132. Re:Move to Arizona by locnar42 · · Score: 1

      We should replace it with nothing. Just eliminate it. It would simplify life at no cost.

      Damn, you're just trying to get all the houses to burn down.

    133. Re:Move to Arizona by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      I visit AZ twice or more a year, and it confused the hell out of me trying to understand how the airline flight to another state changed duration, until someone told me AZ didn't do DST!

    134. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GMT/UTC is the way to go. Let governments, schools and businesses agree when to change their schedules.
      I have this crazy idea that UTC would make people more aware of the world and their relationship to it.

    135. Re:Move to Arizona by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Republicans: The Democrat measure to increase DST to 7 months goes to far!!
      Democrats: The Republican measure to increase DST to 7 months doesn't go far enough!!

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    136. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your daylight saving does not change six hours, only one. At least that's how I read it, I could be wrong.

    137. Re:Move to Arizona by default+luser · · Score: 1

      That's a really poor anecdote. If they made DST mandatory, do you really think that lazy-assed hotel owner will actually check the real time? Ah, hell no: they'll just slash/add an hour off whatever the clock reads.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    138. Re:Move to Arizona by krenshala · · Score: 1

      But, wouldn't you have gone shopping, hit Starbucks and done errands even if you worked that 5th day? I know I would have ...

      Of course, that means you're only saving 10 to 15 percent of the gas instead of 20, but its still a savings.

      Of course, to work 4 days, you have to be there 10 hours. That gets old pretty quickly unless you happen to enjoy your job.

      --

      krenshala

    139. Re:Move to Arizona by krenshala · · Score: 1

      I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but ... ... you are familiar with full spectrum lighting, right?

      --

      krenshala

    140. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time zones are not the issue. They keep the "day" in the sunlight and "night" in the dark as you move east and west. So Californians morning doesn't start at 10:00 am(GMT -8hrs)as opposed to NY at 7:00am (GMT -5hrs) or London at 12:00 pm

    141. Re:Move to Arizona by m_TheRedHead · · Score: 1

      I live in arizona, and still find day light savings time to be a HUGE pain - why you ask? I work for an international company that is head quartered in another state. All of our meeting times are based on PST. So twice a year all of my regularly schedule meetings actually change time, while it stays the same for most everyone else.

    142. Re:Move to Arizona by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      What can I say? I never said the "lazy-assed hotel owner" should set the clock. Every other hotel I've stayed in, from four-star resort to crappy highway Super 8, had the right time (give or take five minutes) on the clock in the room, whether I was there in July or January. They were all in states that observed DST.

      Does that mean somebody on staff actually goes around changing all the clocks twice a year, or that guests do? I don't know. I only know I have a significant sample from DST states, and exactly one example from Indiana. Nobody had bothered to set that clock in years, while someone is setting clocks in all those other hotels at least twice a year.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    143. Re:Move to Arizona by xerxesdaphat · · Score: 1

      You must be joking! I'm an Aucklander who lived in Brisbane for many years (back home for the past couple though), and Queensland, above all places, needs DST the most. The sun -- the big, bright equatorial sun -- comes up at ridiculous times of the morning (4.30am or 5am or so), and unlike Auckland, there's no hills or trees or heavy winter curtains on your windows to hide it.

      Once the working day is finished, you think you'd like to partake in that great Antipodean tradition, the barbecue in the park with your mates. Only problem is, *bam*, with not even a lick of twilight, the sun disappears within half an hour when 6pm or so rolls around.

      Queensland needs to bump forward an entire time zone.

      In Auckland, we've got the time sorted -- shame about the weather then ^_^

      --
      The Shoes of the Fisherman's Wife Are Some Jive Ass Slippers
    144. Re:Move to Arizona by Joseris · · Score: 1

      I like this C&T proposal (covered in slashdot back in 2005: "New Calendar Proposal"), except one thing: week should start in monday, or wee here in Lithuania would need to change all weekday names.

    145. Re:Move to Arizona by bloobloo · · Score: 1

      Think of all the wasted sundials.

    146. Re:Move to Arizona by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Even if it's state-by-state, having to stop and think about what time of year it is to know which timezone you're in is extremely annoying. I went to college in Northern Indiana, and it took me three years to figure out how to keep track of the time differences between Indiana and the rest of the world. Royal Pain In The Neck. The weirdest wrinkle is that certain times of year the timezone line runs *backwards*, i.e., Indiana is (in terms of timezone) one hour *east* of Eastern Daylight Time states, even though it's geographically west of them.

      I don't like DST and consider it pointless, but when 47 out of 50 states are doing it, the other three states need to do it also, because as annoying as DST is, it's still better than being in your own little one-state timezone with different properties than everything around you.

      Now, if the whole country could agree to get rid of the timechange, that would be good.

      Actually, if everybody just started using UTC for everything, I could live with that. But maybe that's because I'm a computer geek who spends more time on the internet than in the real world.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    147. Re:Move to Arizona by jonadab · · Score: 1

      That's why you shouldn't reinvent complicated wheels for an individual software application. Every program that needs this stuff should be using a standard module or library, such as DateTime (for Perl) or the equivalent (for whatever language you're developing in).

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    148. Re:Move to Arizona by Zhila+the+Great+Z · · Score: 1

      I can tell you that DST does not help the farmers in any way. They get up with the sun, and go to bed with the sun, reguardless of what any clock tells them. In Indiana, just prior to the adoption of DST, the Republicans pushed for ET (New York), the Democrats pushed for CT (Chicago), and the farmers pushed for no change.

    149. Re:Move to Arizona by Hugonz · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly like prohibition. Just change the system slightly to tax alcohol to the sky instead of banning it, and add tens of other substances to the prohibition. See how the problem of gangs is gone now?

    150. Re:Move to Arizona by Hugonz · · Score: 1
      That's when I clean and shit,

      I, too, shit on the morning. But i prefer shitting on DST while in Slashdot.

    151. Re:Move to Arizona by Hugonz · · Score: 1

      You mean I can change my schedule without messing with everyone's clocks? I'm trying that.

    152. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God you are a moron. It's not about swinging their power around.

      It's about nudging and creating incentives. Changing what the clock says depending on when the sun is up allows us to do more stuff when the sun is up, and save energy in the process. It just changes when society starts its day, so that we are getting our stuff done when the sun is up. During summer, this means there's lots of daylight at the end of the day. During winter, that means we are using as much daylight as we can.

      DST doesn't change anything but what our clocks say. If you have to get up at sunrise to feed the chickens, continue getting up at sunrise.

      Don't like DST? Don't pay attention to it. When the clocks change, just change when you get up and go to sleep so that you are always waking and sleeping in accordance to the sun.

    153. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, quit worrying about it and chillax.

    154. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should kick that stupid president in the rear for causing the change from first Saturday night in April to last Saturday night in October to be extended by two weeks each way. It was to save energy, but actually increased energy consumption as schools had to be heated one hour earlier in winter, and cooled for an extra hour in late fall. Another act done without rationalisation. If we revert to what we had, all the millions of computer bios's will again be correct.

    155. Re:Move to Arizona by jackpinegirl · · Score: 1

      I also grew up in Arizona. My family moved to Northern California (Napa) for 10 years, and when we came back, I didn't miss DST at all! (No offense Californians, but I don't miss CA either - earthquakes, twisty narrow roads, and the constant rain!) We don't need DST in Arizona. I can't imagine what it would be like to 'Spring Forward', and have sundown moved to even later. In the summer, the overnight low sometimes doesn't get below 90 degrees. I would not want to go to bed at 10:00 with the sun just going down and the temp at over 100. Don't get me wrong, I love hot weather and HATE the cold. This is my home, and not having DST is another great reason to stay here.

    156. Re:Move to Arizona by RhadamanthosIsChaos · · Score: 1

      You kind of left out the whole of southern Indiana, such as Clark and Floyd counties which border Louisville, KY.

      I grew up there, and we certainly did use DST.

      --
      +++OUT OF CHEESE ERROR+++ REDO FROM START +++
    157. Re:Move to Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The radio signal used to synchronize "radio clocks" already has a DST space included. There is no need to change your clock for this. When Congress changes the DST schedule, that info is subsequently integrated into the broadcast. Your clock just needs to know how your location conforms to DST rules:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWVB

  4. No replacement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does it need replacement? Just get rid of it altogether...

    1. Re:No replacement... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Don't just get rid of it. Realign time altogether. The day starts at the crack of dawn; 00:00 and 00 seconds. Start counting from there.

      The daily reseting of clocks would be done via NTP over the internet. Each morning, a computerized weather station would note the sunrise and reset everyones clocks for them. Problem solved!

      Now you'll have to please excuse me, I have to go buy stock in a company that makes internet-connected NTP-based alarm clocks.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    2. Re:No replacement... by rdebath · · Score: 1

      Solar time is not so complex it needs an internet connection it's just 'simple' orbital mechanics after all.

      Also it does have real advantages, especially your variant where the day starts at dawn (the normal day start is noon) because it matches with our biology.

      Still to help people adjust I think dawn should be at (say) 6AM.

         

  5. May be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nightdark Wasting Time ?

    1. Re:May be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NightDark Wasting SPACE.

    2. Re:May be ... by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Dammit. Nobody could have thought of that one before me, or so I thought.

      However, I propose Dark night Squandering Time. It has the benefit of not requiring us to s/DST/NWT/g

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  6. umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, isn't STANDARD time upon us?

    1. Re:umm by Golddess · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for most of the world, but the UK goes back to standard time on October 26th, and the US (those places that do DST anyway) reverts on November 1st.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    2. Re:umm by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Whoops, correcting myself here. November 2nd, not 1st.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    3. Re:umm by gnuASM · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually, isn't STANDARD time upon us?

      Yes it is!

      I was sitting here trying to find ANYBODY that had it right. Daylight Savings is not upon us...we're leaving it behind for Standard time! Is everyone in the U.S. turned into a blithering idiot nowadays? One would have to think so....

      Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. no. 109-58, 119 Stat 594 (2005).

      Perhaps everyone in the U.S. simply cannot read anymore? Brains checked out at the door. Good little sheeple being taken to the slaughter. Idiots.

    4. Re:umm by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no, your geeky precise brain has missed the real point, that we needlessly fuck with the time twice a year, wasting energy, time and money. Who gives a shit whether we're "coming off" or "coming onto" one standard to take up another? Doesn't even matter since both are arbitrary inventions of man.

    5. Re:umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is everyone in the U.S. turned into a blithering idiot nowadays? One would have to think so....

      Perhaps everyone in the U.S. simply cannot read anymore? Brains checked out at the door. Good little sheeple being taken to the slaughter. Idiots.

      I think that's a fairly harsh response to a fairly simple mistake. Especially from someone who can't get his head around the fact that it's daylight saving time - not daylight savings time.

  7. Internet Required by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "9-5" business hours is a convention because there's no easy way to do anything different in a pre-wired world.

    Now that we have or are about to have ubiquitous Internet everywhere, companies should publish smbmeta files at domainname.foo/smbmeta.xml with their hours in it, and have every useful directory service (Google Local, Yellowpages.com, that iPhone thing, etc.) understand a linkage between a domain name and store (oh, and the phone thing too, which can usually be used as the 'foreign key'). Good VOIP phones could easily do the same. The cost is practically nil for everybody and we get past the need for conventions.

    Of course there are clustering reasons to coordinate business hours on a geographical basis, but individual businesses can make those decisions and either profit or lose business by them.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Internet Required by JeffSh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm afraid I must disagree. 9-5 business hours are becoming even more important in a connected world because of our desire/need for immediate responses.

      Businesses must be open during similar hours so that we may respond to each others requests. For instance, call cenders in India are open and running at night for them in order to service our requests from the states..

      I am not interested in dispatching an email and expecting a response. People talk to one another still and always will. 9-5 business hours are here to stay and will only get more important.

    2. Re:Internet Required by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      "9-5" business hours is a convention because there's no easy way to do anything different in a pre-wired world.

      And because you are bowing to the results of several millenia of evolution.
      (cue the legions of /.ers relishing their midnight coding sessions at 110% efficiency)

    3. Re:Internet Required by zeropointentity · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. More than likely, global 24/7 response time is what will be required, with additional people working during peak hours. Shipping docks run like this. Most people on 8-8 and one or two at night. "Peak Hours" will simply depend on the economics of the moment.

    4. Re:Internet Required by Stiletto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The worldwide inter-connectedness of business is a strong argument AGAINST the 9-5 schedule. What good is standardizing on "9-5" when your customer on the west coast and your partners in India, Japan, and England all have their own, different 9-5?

      Who the hell even picked 9 and 5, and what makes those particular numbers so special that everyone has to change our entire time system twice a year to make sure those are always work hours?

      If every business adopted a very simple "go to work when you have to and leave when you have to" policy, we wouldn't care what the damn clock said, and would need neither time zones nor daylight saving time.

    5. Re:Internet Required by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      Does Google actually look at smbmeta.xml files?

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    6. Re:Internet Required by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think they picked 9-5 As Sunrise as 8:00 is the latest time (without DST adjustment) the sun comes up the North Part of the United States. Allowing people of pre-alarm clock days to wake up when the sun rises. Enough time to prepare for work and get there an hour later. As for the 5 it is 8 hours later. Probably 8 hours as it can easily split up your day. 8 hours for sleeping, 8 hours for work, 8 hours of your own time... A healthy balance approach. As Well it can be split into 2 4 hour increments falling in the middle at noon for Lunch, and using the AM/PM to really help divide the day. As well 5:00 is when the sun sets on the shortest days of the year. So in general allowing lighted working conditions during your work day.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Internet Required by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      If every business adopted a very simple "go to work when you have to and leave when you have to" policy, we wouldn't care what the damn clock said, and would need neither time zones nor daylight saving time.

      Yeah. The problems with that are far greater than those which they solve.

      Firstly, you get people who decide they don't need to go to work nearly half as often as their co-workers and you wind up with people passing the buck.

      Secondly, what happens when a customer expects you to be there at 9:30 but nobody feels like coming in until 11?

      There's something to be said for allowing times where people can expect someone to be sitting at their desk and for the moment, 9-5 are those times in our modern society.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    8. Re:Internet Required by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Before RMS spoke about it most of you were for Cloud Computing now you are against it. You're a bunch of sheep.

      Heh. I thought cloud computing was a stupid idea when it was still called Web 2.0.

      Yes, that is the geek version of "I already listened to $BAND_NAME when they were still underground".

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    9. Re:Internet Required by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      The worldwide inter-connectedness of business is a strong argument AGAINST the 9-5 schedule. What good is standardizing on "9-5" when your customer on the west coast and your partners in India, Japan, and England all have their own, different 9-5?

      Depends on what you're doing... if you're dealing with business partners, then yes, it's a good idea to have similar working hours. However, when dealing with business partners, it's also a good idea to conduct your business in writing so there's a paper trail of your transactions and interactions.

      When you're in the business of dealing with customers, it's best to provide service when they're awake. Depending on what service you're providing, it may make sense to limit your working hours to 9-5, or some version thereof, particularly if you're doing some kind of outbound or proactive customer service (say... calling customers when their order is having delivery troubles or will be delayed, as an example). It's majorly bad karma to try to call your customer at 3am.

      If every business adopted a very simple "go to work when you have to and leave when you have to" policy, we wouldn't care what the damn clock said, and would need neither time zones nor daylight saving time.

      Many modern workplaces do allow for flex time. I'm on it myself.... I show up when I am able, I leave when the work is done. As long as I don't bill for time I don't put in, and as long as the work gets done, they don't care what time of day it gets done. This falls apart when you're in the field of inbound customer service, however... technical support, customer care, sales... there, they have service levels they need to worry about, and that is why they schedule you for set times, and why they schedule when you go on break.

      No matter what you propose, however... the only way we are going to get rid of timezones is if we adopt a single timezone for the whole world. Once we're on the UTC standard or something similar, then we won't need to worry about timezones... until then, we still need specific timings. Why? Think about why timezones were invented in the first place: train schedules. These days, it's delivery schedules and other transit methods like air travel, but the point stands. They *need* stuff like timezones and standardized time in order to coordinate.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    10. Re:Internet Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow me to point out that you aren't as important as you seem to think you are.

      Nobody cares that you demand an answer right now. You can either send an email and the business will deal with your request when it's "your turn", or you can call and leave a message and the business can deal with your request when it's "your turn".

      Of course, if there's no pending queue for service, your email may get a prompt reply or your call may be answered immediately. But if that's not the case, get over yourself. You are one of many customers, and if you shift to the competition (assuming there is any), you'll simply displace one of their customers to their competition (i.e. me).

      9-5 business hours are an antiquated notion and the sooner you realize it, the sooner we can all enjoy a much more efficient (read: "cheaper for you to buy goods/services") and happy (read: "easier for you to get what you want from customer-facing employees") business world.

      Welcome to the new economy, dinosaur. Pick up the pace; I see a meteor.

    11. Re:Internet Required by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Heh. I thought cloud computing was a stupid idea when it was still called Web 2.0.

      No, no, no! Web 2.0 was social networking with stupid looking badges on pages. Cloud computing is Web 3.0 - Now with stupid looking applications!

      --
      That is all.
    12. Re:Internet Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand thinking can be quite a challenge so let me try and explain the point. If an appointment is made with a client at 9, then someone needs to be at work; probably the person whom the appointment was made with. As for passing the buck, if each employee has a certain set of duties that they need to do to fulfill job requirements (yes this would take some planning by management) then there would be no real buck to pass. In the event of too much buck passing, job duties can be reiterated/changed or employees can be fired/hired. See, we can do things without too much authoritarianism.

    13. Re:Internet Required by ojustgiveitup · · Score: 1

      Oh boy! I love it when people ask (or state) leading questions that are actually easy to answer!

      Firstly, you get people who decide they don't need to go to work nearly half as often as their co-workers and you wind up with people passing the buck.

      Firstly, if this is a problem you have, then your management system is busted. People should have goals and time periods with which to achieve them, and good explanations or repercussions when they fail to do so. This may be harder to manage than saying "Sit at your desk during these time periods on these days and I'll know you're working," but will lead to more productivity and higher employee morale (not unrelated). Harder for management maybe, but good for the company and good for the employees.

      Secondly, what happens when a customer expects you to be there at 9:30 but nobody feels like coming in until 11?

      Secondly, not everybody is in a customer-facing position, particularly in the technology-driven marketplace, which I believe most of the slashdot audience is a part of. Obviously those who are in customer-facing positions must be available at those times when their customers need them to be, but there is no point in requiring everyone else to be there as well.

    14. Re:Internet Required by ojustgiveitup · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Grandparent defeated his own argument with his own example. Those people in the call centers in India are not in the 9-5 of the states when they are answering our calls, nor are they in the 9-5 of Europe when they are answering their calls, they have to determine the times in their own country that correspond to those times in ours. Not a hard calculation, but the system achieves nothing here.

    15. Re:Internet Required by ojustgiveitup · · Score: 1

      Good response. However I fail to see how timezones and daylight savings time helps with transportation schedules. Fiddling with times makes those things harder, not easier. People tell incorrect times to be picked up, miss meetings, etc. because of these unnecessary time calculations that are easily mistaken.

    16. Re:Internet Required by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Who the hell even picked 9 and 5

      Uh...... Dolly Parton?

    17. Re:Internet Required by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Train schedules required a single, universal time for the whole country (i.e. Britain, where there were the first long-enough distance trains). Previously, noon would be when the sun was exactly overhead, so there were a few minutes difference between the east and west of the island. That's no good for a train schedule, so all the clocks were set to Greenwich (London) time.

      An extension of this is that the whole world should adapt the same time (e.g. UTC). My plane schedule might say I leave London at midnight (0000) and arrive in Chicago at 0800, but then I would need to know what the normal daylight hours of Chicago are.
      But it would be easier when I'm arranging a telephone/internet meeting with Chicago as we'd both have the same clock to look at.

    18. Re:Internet Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Who the hell even picked 9 and 5

      Damn you, Dolly Parton?

    19. Re:Internet Required by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      ""9-5" business hours is a convention"

      Where? Here in Eastern WA, work is 7:30 to 4. Most Stores are 7 or 8 to 6. Wally-world never closes.

      When I was in CA last, the hours were 11 AM to 9 or 10 PM. I assume it started that way to miss the morning fog. Oppositely, in Nevada, work was 7 to 3:30, and the stores were 6 or 7 AM to 5 or 6.

    20. Re:Internet Required by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Taken to extremes you could do what China does. One timezone for the entire enormous country to make sure everyone is on Beijing time. From what I've heard from some Chinese some distance away from there people tend to just ignore the clock more than most people.

    21. Re:Internet Required by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Ah, quite interesting, thanks. Maybe it's just an east coast thing.

      I'll have to ask Dolly Parton.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:Internet Required by Elrond,+Duke+of+URL · · Score: 1

      The worldwide inter-connectedness of business is a strong argument AGAINST the 9-5 schedule. What good is standardizing on "9-5" when your customer on the west coast and your partners in India, Japan, and England all have their own, different 9-5?

      Because, Internet be damned, the vast majority of people still work closely with people immediately nearby. If we were all just working individually with other random people from across the globe then sure, but that's not how society works. Even in a hyper-connected world, you're still going to work more frequently with people nearby.

      Even with my almost entirely computer oriented job, nearly all of the people I must contact for work are in the same building and, if not there, then in a nearby state. Now, the business hours don't need to be 9-5, but we do need scheduled hours.

      Back on topic, though, DST is pointless. I live in Arizona where we don't do it, but I also just spent three years in Massachusetts which does. I wasn't inconvenienced by having the sun still up at 9PM, but it sure didn't help me in any way either.

      --
      Elrond, Duke of URL
      "This is the most fun I've had without being drenched in the blood of my enemies!"-Sam&Max
    23. Re:Internet Required by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Oh look a person who lives in the US .... .... 9 to 5 predates the USA

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    24. Re:Internet Required by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      So in general allowing lighted working conditions during your work day.

      It's bright outside when you sit inside with the flourescent lights and the computer screens, and it's dark outside when you want to play soccer with your kids [don't have any]. That's really well thought out ;)

    25. Re:Internet Required by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Train schedules required a single, universal time for the whole country (i.e. Britain, where there were the first long-enough distance trains). Previously, noon would be when the sun was exactly overhead, so there were a few minutes difference between the east and west of the island. That's no good for a train schedule, so all the clocks were set to Greenwich (London) time.

      Actually, standardized timezones were invented by Sanford Fleming, a Canadian. He chose 1h differences in timezones because Canada is really big. Really big. And wide. Rather than have the whole country set to a single clock, the whole country was set to 4 clocks, as a concession to the fact that people are used to getting up and working during the hours we normally equate with daylight. 9-5, am/pm, etc. It wouldn't make sense to have sunrise in Nova Scotia at 6am and have it rise in BC at 10am. People would adjust, but because we're human and not machines, it was decided to have time differences in set 1h increments: it's a nice round number, and as there's 24h in a day, the width of timezones was decided to be 1/24 of the circumference of the world. That way, at least the whole world would be on the same calendar date. You'll notice that the differentiating lines tend to zig-zag along political boundaries, and *that* is a concession to the idea of smaller countries having the entire country in the same zone.

      Using Greenwich to set the mean time is an idea that came from a symposium years later.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    26. Re:Internet Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was 8 to 5.

    27. Re:Internet Required by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Greenwich time was used by the British railway companies from 1847
      GMT was established in 1675 for ships.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_zone#History
      http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel3/1150/5280/00206266.pdf?arnumber=206266 (halfway down page 6)

      This short survey would not be complete without some brief mention of the important part played by the railway telegraph in the establishment of standard timekeeping throughout the country.

      Before the advent of the railway, different communities kept local time related to the meridien of the place concerned. Although the time of day therefore varied from place to place (16 minutes between London and Penzance), this was of little inconvenience because travellers were few and the rate of travel was slow. The development of railways after 1825 however brought a new situation. The continuing use of local time in different parts of the country caused great difficulty in compiling timetables and maintaining punctuality, especially on those lines, such as the GWR [Great Western Railway], which ran mainly east to west.

      Proposals had been made as early as 1840 that London time should be kept throughout the country, but many towns were reluctant to come into line, and it was not until 1880 that the maintenance of Greenwich time became a legal requirement. On the railways however, the companies had agred in 1847 that they would adopt London time as standard for timetable compilation and train running. In then became necessary to have some means of checking the time kept by the railyway clocks throughout the system, ...

    28. Re:Internet Required by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      Actually no, this is the geek version of that.

    29. Re:Internet Required by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      The only trouble with that theory: the mechanical alarm clock is a lot older than the forty hour work week.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    30. Re:Internet Required by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Most of those interconnected parters are even MORE connected with local businesses.

      Being open at night would be counterproductive due to any local contacts being closed, that is why SOME local standard is needed.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    31. Re:Internet Required by TacheonPulse · · Score: 1

      Probably 8 hours as it can easily split up your day. 8 hours for sleeping, 8 hours for work, 8 hours of your own time... A healthy balance approach.

      8 hours a day 5 days a week is what Henry Ford found maximizes productivity over the long term for auto workers. More than that and you get worker burnout and higher error rates. It's found to be generally applicable across all industries.

    32. Re:Internet Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "9-5" business hours is a convention because there's no easy way to do anything different in a pre-wired world.

      Now that we have or are about to have ubiquitous Internet everywhere, companies should publish smbmeta [trellixtech.com] files at domainname.foo/smbmeta.xml with their hours in it, and have every useful directory service (Google Local, Yellowpages.com, that iPhone thing, etc.) understand a linkage between a domain name and store

      No thank you. I do not want this kind of technical regression imposing extra inconvenience in my life. It enrages me that a very simple and relatively painless thing like Daylight Savings Time inspires people to propose such outrageously inconvenient lunacy as businesses independently choosing to implement their own time shifts, which may or may not be coordinated with anyone else.

      The only comfort I take is that no business would be stupid enough to change its hours seasonally unless it had an exceptional reason to do so. Every day in the last hour of business, customers would go to businesses that they knew were open. If they weren't sure, they wouldn't go.

      Regular customers know when a business is open. My favorite bookstores close at 11pm and 10pm, the three grocery stores I use close at 9pm, 10pm, and never, the cleaners closes at 7pm, my vet closes at 6pm, the convenience store down the street closes at midnight, and the quick oil change place closes at 7pm. It's easy to remember, because businesses keep their hours stable for YEARS at a time. I can confidently plan my week around that knowledge without pulling out my goddamn iPhone every morning and checking. I do NOT want to regress from this.

      "Hey, do you want to have a drink after work?"

      "Maybe. Let me pull out my iPhone and check the hours of the every businesses I need to visit this week and cross-reference them with the hours of my own business. I used to be able to do this operation in my head in a few seconds, but everything is so efficient and automated these days that you're just going to have to wait a few minutes while I figure out the answer to a simple question about my own schedule."

  8. This is not a problem by slashname3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do away with DST. If people want/need to get up earlier or later to take advantage of the daylight then JUST GET UP EARLIER OR LATER! There is no good reason to change the clock backward and forward. Lots of places don't do it and they don't have any problems. STOP DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME!

    1. Re:This is not a problem by Fear13ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, do away with it, and the 9-5 business model dates back to the days of bartering. It was implemented before mankind had the ability to control light. First we need to make more environmentally sounds lighting sources. Then the answer to a lot of our current problems can be resolved by moving to a 24 hour society. It would create jobs, reduce traffic thus improving fuel efficiency and reducing accidents. It will allow people to work during hours which may increase productivity. Personally even though I live on the east coast, I still feel my body is stuck on PST. I've lived in this time zone for about 20 years now, but my ideal day would be 11 to 8.

    2. Re:This is not a problem by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      DST served a useful purpose at one time. It *does* reduce energy usage...for lighting. Back in the early part of the 20th century, the largest portion of home electrical usage was for lighting. Nowadays it's such a small part this savings has no measurable effect.

      The effect it does have is actually increasing energy usage as people crank on the AC when they get home earlier in the daylight of afternoon and it's hotter. And AC is vastly more expensive to operate than a bulb.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    3. Re:This is not a problem by snl2587 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was implemented before mankind had the ability to control light.

      Be that as it may, I'm one to prefer natural light over artificial light, and it is simply not an option to change my schedule. The way I see it, DST year-round is much better. It really comes down to personal preference, though, which makes it really hard for any democratic-ish countries to change it.

    4. Re:This is not a problem by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly this. If it's too dark when you get up or when you want to open your business, don't change the clock, change the time you get up or open your business.

      If that's too hard, lets have DST year round. Standard time is only in effect for a couple months anyway. Keeping DST through the winter would keep it light when most people get off work, which is when it actually matters anyway. I know I'd rather get up in the dark, and have an hour of daylight after work to play with, rather than getting up at dawn and wasting that hour getting ready for work.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:This is not a problem by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Troll, Really? wow.

      Lame modding aside, I agree that the simplest solution is to switch to year-round DST. That was my first thought anyway. People in southern states don't understand daylight savings time because they already get a ridiculous amount of sun... but when you live up there in the north, getting that extra hour of sun during the summer / spring is *really* nice. Unilaterally changing your own hours doesn't solve that. School isn't going to accept the fact that you want to show up an hour early and leave an hour late and most bosses won't either (especially if your business hasn't even opened yet at that hour).

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    6. Re:This is not a problem by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Back in the early part of the 20th century, the largest portion of home electrical usage was for lighting. Nowadays it's such a small part this savings has no measurable effect.

      Got any numbers to back that up? Because, last I checked, every city street, business office, and residential home was still lit by electricity. I'd be truly startled if lighting didn't make up for at least a "measurable" fraction of total energy consumption, particularly in high-latitude regions.

    7. Re:This is not a problem by matthelm007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it does NOT save ANY money. Duke electric (?), which has the before and after records on Northern Indiana, where they just made the switch a few years ago from not having DST, had a study done using that data. There was NO saving what so ever, in fact, usage went up slightly (again, they also have areas that didn't change to compare normal year changes) up! (wish I'd kept the link, but I think it was even post here.)

    8. Re:This is not a problem by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      As we discovered last year, it does *not*. It might have in the late 19th century, when only businesses had to be lit, or something, but it doesn't make sense any more.

      Further, you're conserving the wrong thing. Instead of evvverrybody just all going in an hour earlier, we need to spread it out more. I'd lay odds you waste more energy in stop & go traffic in one morning commute alone than weeks of wasting an hour's worth of lighting per day.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:This is not a problem by profplump · · Score: 1

      I'd be particularly surprised if your business turned off lights during the day and on at night -- most business run lighting when people are present, regardless of the outside conditions. Most building designs don't allow any other option.

      In a similar fashion, street lights run only when it's dark. They don't care what time it is or how long it's been since they turned on -- they run from dusk to dawn no matter what the clock says.

      Homes are the one place that lighting is likely to be used more when it's dark then when it's light. But even at home there are many places were lighting is based on occupancy and not time-of-day.

    10. Re:This is not a problem by ColdBoot · · Score: 1

      +1 - move it 1/2 hour and then leave it alone!

    11. Re:This is not a problem by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      He said: home electrical usage

      Compared to your AC unit, Washer/Dryer, Fridge, Heater, Hot Water Heater, Computer(s), TV(s), and everything else. Saving 1 hour of having a few lights on in the house is small.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    12. Re:This is not a problem by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      STOP DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME!

      Sigh...

      Despite the summary actually getting it right, it seems no one here can. It's Daylight Saving Time. The adjustment is made to save daylight for the daytime hours, which has been shown to reduce energy consumption.

      I.E. The time standard is saving daylight for you, rather than what "Daylight Savings Time" would imply... stuffing this season's sunlight into a box for use in the summer... or "All natural daylight on sale %20 off!"

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    13. Re:This is not a problem by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      To build on this, why not use UT or GMT while we're at it? If you're open from 1100 to 1900, I'll know when you're open no matter where in the world I am, provided we're both using UT/GMT. Time zones are another outdated and stupid concept, in a very well connected age.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    14. Re:This is not a problem by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Why not change the working hours to 8-4 then?
      (Then you still get the sun right above at 1200).

    15. Re:This is not a problem by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Got any numbers to back that up?

      Here you go. Note how the daily demand curve follows the daily meteorological temperature profile. While there are other factors, including business and industrial demand, the activity that drives the overall shape this curve is air conditioning. (Note also the second peak at ~1900 hours, when people are preparing meals and cleaning after.)

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    16. Re:This is not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People in southern states don't understand daylight savings time because they already get a ridiculous amount of sun... but when you live up there in the north, getting that extra hour of sun during the summer / spring is *really* nice."

      Umm... no offence, but do you have any idea what you are talking about?

      You do understand that above the Artic Circle (ie. 'the North') in the Summer it can be light 24 hours a day? You think there is a huge need to get that additional hour over 23? You think people are craving that?

      Sorry, but you have no understanding of how the seasons actually work and the effect they have on daylight hours.

    17. Re:This is not a problem by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      DST standardizes the times that businesses change their hours.

      If you left it to every owner to change operating hours, you'd have big problems. Some stores would change; some wouldn't. Some would change early; some late.

      A lot of people have a schedule and need to complete tasks inside a specific set of hours. i.e., I hit the bank at 8:30am and then get to work at 9am. If my company changed hours and the bank didn't, I'd not be able to hit the bank in the morning. I'd have to shuffle my schedule all around to make up for it.

      Multiply this by 200,000,000 people in the US, and you start to get a sense of the problem.

      Right now, I live in Japan; no DST. Companies don't change their hours either. The result? The sun comes up at about 4am in the summer and still goes down by 8pm at night. No long summer nights to enjoy a BBQ in the back yard. It kinda makes me miss DST.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    18. Re:This is not a problem by forceman130 · · Score: 1

      STOP DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME!,

      It's actually Daylight Saving Time, no plural.

      --
      Wow, a 7 digit ID - let that be a lesson in the perils of procrastination.
    19. Re:This is not a problem by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Except that I don't get an extra hour of sun during the summer. I just get up an hour earlier and call it the same time. Still get the same amount of sun.

    20. Re:This is not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DST served a useful purpose at one time. It *does* reduce energy usage...for lighting.

      The daylight you "save" by needing to close the curtains to be able to see the TV in the evening is spent as electricity when you need to turn on the light in the morning. Oh wait, the daylight you "save" isn't converted to electricity, it's just being wasted.

      Just like the wasted hour at work in the morning, when the brain turns on at 10 AM rather than 9 AM.

    21. Re:This is not a problem by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      You can't save DAYLIGHT! The concept is silly. You don't get any extra daylight by changing the clock.

      If you want to see more sunlight then get up when it is out and go to bed when it is not.

      There are huge areas that don't change for DST and they don't have any issues. The argument of saving power by doing this is debatable at best. Most places use lights all day anyway.

      So stop the madness. Pick a time and stick to it. So what if the clock says 6:00am, if that is the start of your work day then get to work. It does not matter.

      And for those that actually have a "9 to 5" job kudos to you. Lately I have been starting a 2am and working through until about 7pm or later. But that is due to maintenance windows to minimize impact due to down time on the servers.

    22. Re:This is not a problem by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      Of course you don't get any extra daylight. DST just shifts the clock so that daylight is more appropriately confined to "daytime" hours. Hence, daylight is "saved" for "daytime."

      Sorry if I wasn't clear.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    23. Re:This is not a problem by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      But here in southern states (U.S.) it would only be light until about 7 PM for most of the summer if we were always in standard time, while it is dark by 6PM for most of the winter. Sure, the days are a lot more consistent here than further up north, but DST does make it a lot nicer. Again, this is why it's so hard to change the way the system works in the U.S. now: while Minnesotans would probably be fine if they used standard time in the summer and didn't have light at 9:30PM +, I love being able to see and do things outdoors in Florida til 8PM +.

    24. Re:This is not a problem by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Yes, because a huge percentage of America is within the Arctic circle. Oh, wait, no that's just a small piece of Alaska and only pipeline workers live up there.

      My point was that there are only about three months of the year that are worth being outside - and for those months it's nice getting extra hours outside in the sun. When you live in Arizona you get sun all the freaking time and it doesn't matter.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  9. Get rid of it by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See subject. Then make everyone talk in UTC. That should do it.

    --
    That is all.
    1. Re:Get rid of it by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then make everyone talk in UTC. That should do it.

      Almost. Everybody should be using 24 hour time as well. ie, it's now 20:40.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Get rid of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You forgot esperanto.

    3. Re:Get rid of it by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      See subject. Then make everyone talk in UTC. That should do it.

      You've been modded funny, but I seriously don't see any problem with doing that at all[1]. Why does it matter that the clock points close to 12 when we have lunch, instead of 3 or 9 or some other arbitrary number?

      China has only one timezone and no DST, it seems to work for them.

      [1] I actually live in the UK, so for me this would only mean losing DST, but I wouldn't care if the standard chosen was UTC + 6 or whatever.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    4. Re:Get rid of it by n3tcat · · Score: 1

      Move to a continent that uses metric :P

    5. Re:Get rid of it by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      You forgot esperanto.

      And believe me, it took some effort...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    6. Re:Get rid of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody should be using 24 hour time as well. ie, it's now 20:40.

      Well, there is this place called "Europe" where they actually do this already. Them crazy krauts!

    7. Re:Get rid of it by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Over here in Germany we use 24 hour time and UTC might not be a hard sell either (we're UTC +1/+2).

      It would definitely make things easier if at least international businesses and communities talked UTC. Remember the Firefox download day where people from half the planet wondered why Mozilla hasn't started the action even though the date/time specified on the site have already been reached. Only afterwards did many people learn that Mozilla meant that time in some American time zone nobody has ever heard about.

      If you try to give a date/time to someone who's probably not from your own country it's usually a bad idea to use local time. UTC was made for a reason and arguably should have greater significance on the internet.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    8. Re:Get rid of it by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      24 hour time? How silly. That's not metric at all. Everyone should use TAI. No zones, no DST, no silly mixture of six different bases, no leap anythings: just simple integers.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    9. Re:Get rid of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While we're at it, we should do something about that wonky calendar system we have, too. Seriously.

      Standardize on a logical calendar. Years are solar. Months are lunar. So divide a year (365.25 days) by a month (28 days). You get 13R1.25. So 13 months, 28 days each (which makes for an easy 4 weeks per month), one "new year's day" that isn't a month and isn't a day of the week (and is always a day off from work and a long weekend!), and every 4 years a leap-new-year's-day, making for an extra day off "between years".

      It's the classic pre-Tudor-England year-and-a-day calendar, but with a modern knowledge of leap days thrown in for better accuracy.

      Now if we could just apply the same logic to time of day... 86400 is a really ugly number to work from. How long should a second really be? Or more to the point, how many of them do we want in a day? If we work from there, we can devise a timekeeping system many orders of magnitude easier and more accurate than the one we currently use. Sort of like how metric tried to redefine and standardize other measurements.

    10. Re:Get rid of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm already there, and having to convert EVE Time (aka UTC) to my local timezone CDT. We all need to be synchronized to the same time and then the whole planet can do business together at the same time. If the Eskimos can sleep when the sun is up for 6 months straight, I'm sure everyone can adjust to the sun being up at a different part of the day.

      We are just going to have to get used to it anyway if we ever get to the point where we leave this planet.

    11. Re:Get rid of it by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

      UTC is 24h00 based...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinated_Universal_Time

      there is no am/pm in UTC.

      and yes everyone should use UTC, and just the local jurisdictions should just set default hours of operation, by translating local 9-5 to UTC.

      for me, ordinary hours would be 13h00-21h00

      I work with people in four timezones, and I hate that I never really know when a meeting is. I hate dst, I hate all of it. UTC would make things much simpler.

      oh, and the right way to write dates is the ISO way... yyyy-mm-dd

    12. Re:Get rid of it by camperdave · · Score: 1

      24 hour time? How silly. That's not metric at all.

      True, it is not strictly metric, but it does fall into the acceptable use standards.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    13. Re:Get rid of it by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      What bad luck! If you had just waited for this story, it would have been so easy!

    14. Re:Get rid of it by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      oh, and the right way to write dates is the ISO way... yyyy-mm-dd

      Completely agree. It's big-endian, sortable by a normal text sort, and putting the 4-digit year in front removes all the ambiguity of people wondering whether it's a "US" or "Euro" date.

    15. Re:Get rid of it by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      24 hour time only dates back 6000 years someone will come up with something to replace it soon ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    16. Re:Get rid of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, UTC with GPS based compensation, so no matter where you are your time piece (phone) will say 12:00:00 noon when the sun is directly overhead. People will get better at math too trying to figure out the time difference in seconds for their friends that live across town - and what time they would have to leave their own house to arrive on time.

    17. Re:Get rid of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as AM/PM in UTC anyway, so requiring 24-hour is implicit already.

    18. Re:Get rid of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the answer. UTC in 24 hour format.

      Wake up time might be 18:00 - what's wrong with that? Work might be 20:00 - 04:00 - what's wrong with that?

      I like it.

      No more time zones!
      One time for all!

    19. Re:Get rid of it by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Standardize on a logical calendar.

      I always liked the Shire Reckoning calendar. Twelve months of 30 days, giving 360 days. In the middle of summer, between the first six months and the last six months there are three days not belonging to any month. In leap years, the extra day is added into those. Of course, being of Hobbit design, these days are Midsummer Festival days, a time for parties, lots of food, and lots of fun. There are also two days between the last month and the first month of the next year. These are Yule days, again a reason for a party with lots of food and fun.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    20. Re:Get rid of it by hugh.chadwick · · Score: 1

      UTC = GMT Suits me I'm British

  10. Forget about it by djupedal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > "What is the best way for humans to deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year and still foster coordination over disparate time zones?"

    Russia has a dozen time zones and fares just fine - as does China, with only one. This business of claiming that 'light' is a problem needing a solution is the only issue here...

    1. Re:Forget about it by tsalmark · · Score: 2, Funny

      I propose we use artificial light, either incandescence, halogen, LCD, CFL or bonfires to solve the lack of light issues.

    2. Re:Forget about it by jacks0n · · Score: 5, Funny

      We should build a shell around the earth covered in solar cells on the outside and florescent bulbs on the inside. This way we could make it the same time for everyone all the time on earth, and we'd all be equal all the time and live in perfect harmony until the dim green flickering light, the neverending ballast hum, and the sweet smell of air-conditioner mold drives us all stark-raving mad.

    3. Re:Forget about it by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean, "In Soviet Russia..."?

    4. Re:Forget about it by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hear northern Russia is a paradise.

    5. Re:Forget about it by nizo · · Score: 1

      Plus as an added bonus the U.S. could stimulate the economy by turning the whole country into one huge lightbulb factory (with rocket launchpads on top to keep putting the lightbulbs in orbit).

    6. Re:Forget about it by effigiate · · Score: 1

      I think Highlander 2 proved that this won't work. :P

    7. Re:Forget about it by SuurMyy · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia it's YOU who changes the DST ?

      --
      The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne
    8. Re:Forget about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the only thing that bothers me about fluorescent lights is how much they remind me of Portal.

      And that's not a problem at all.

      WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

    9. Re:Forget about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China gets away so easily with only having one timezone because 90% of the population is within an hour of that meridian anyway. The peasants who don't live near it don't care because they probably can't even afford clocks.

      dom

    10. Re:Forget about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia has a dozen time zones and fares just fine - as does China, with only one.

      I'm sure the Uighur (those in western China for those who don't know) are quite ready to disagree with you. They'd love to have a more apt time zone.

    11. Re:Forget about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh - you just reminded me of the aweful 3rd highlander movie that I actually watched... Damn it all!

    12. Re:Forget about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia has a dozen time zones

      That's, that's ridiculous. Eleven. It's not even funny.

    13. Re:Forget about it by dwye · · Score: 1

      > I think Highlander 2 proved that this won't work. :P

      Well, Highlander 2 proved that Highlander 2 wouldn't work.

    14. Re:Forget about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except the earth would crash into the huge shell and then we'd have a giant mercury and glass problem.

      (In inverse square system, like gravity, a spherical shell about any mass has equal force exerted on both hemispheres - no matter the displacement of that mass within the sphere. Cool, eh?)

  11. DST is ending by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, DST is coming to an end. The summer is when the hours are artificially moved ahead. The winter time is the actual "accurate" earth time.

    1. Re:DST is ending by skerit · · Score: 1

      That's true, and in Belgium lots of people have said they wanted to cancel DST, summer time. I actually rather have more light at the end of the day then in the beginning. Winters are so depressing.

    2. Re:DST is ending by internerdj · · Score: 3, Funny

      That makes no sense. If you think winter is so depressing why cancel summer time?

    3. Re:DST is ending by crosbie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So we have non-DST all year round and work from 8am to 4pm so that midday is always when the sun is at its zenith.

      Those at certain latitudes could also have summer hours of 7:30am to 4:30pm, and winter hours of 8:30am to 3:30pm, i.e. a shorter business day in the winter.

      Midday and daylight hours are going to vary throughout the year and across the planet anyway.

    4. Re:DST is ending by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      That's true, and in Belgium lots of people have said they wanted to cancel DST, summer time. I actually rather have more light at the end of the day then in the beginning. Winters are so depressing.

      So what you're saying is that you'd like the clock moved to DST all year round?

      (DST was designed to give people an extra hour of light at the end of the day, but you seem to be implying you'd like to rid the world of just that?)

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    5. Re:DST is ending by skerit · · Score: 1

      No, I said others want to cancel DST, summer time. And then I said I actually like it, having more light at the end of the day. I never said I wanted it gone.

    6. Re:DST is ending by skerit · · Score: 1

      Actually, in Europe, this "summer time" was designed to give us more light, not DST. Since I was replying to "self assembled struc"'s post, which explained why technically DST is coming to an end and not beginning, I didn't think it was necessary to explain this concept again.

    7. Re:DST is ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be in a different hemisphere to the rest of the world where summer is just starting and daylight savings has just started or is about to.

    8. Re:DST is ending by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Really? I could have sworn that it just started a month or two ago. After all, it is summer!

    9. Re:DST is ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, DST is coming to an end. The summer is when the hours are artificially moved ahead. The winter time is the actual "accurate" earth time.

      DST is not coming to an end. It flies south for the Northern Winter.

    10. Re:DST is ending by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Yeah I saw that mistake in the summary and thought, haha - they screwed up. But as an Australian, we have just 'sprung forward' in the last couple of weeks. So the title was accurate for us Southern hemisphere-ites.

      Having said that - I don't like DST either and would rather they just did away with it. Hate having to go round adjusting all my random non-NTP-connected clocks twice a year. I live at 35 deg S latitude and although I do appreciate the later sunsets in summer, I could do this just as effectively by getting my lazy ass out of bed earlier so I got home a bit earlier ;)

    11. Re:DST is ending by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      Because in order to compete in a global economy, our farmers needed some help. So our government gave their crops an extra hour of daylight. ;)

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    12. Re:DST is ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now if I could only get people to understand the difference between EDT and EST and CDT that would be great!

      now can you guess which state I'm in? (here's a hint, My Man Mitch changed to DST several years ago! and I moved here because we didn't do daylight savings!)

    13. Re:DST is ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it just started for me. Not everyone is in the northern hemisphere.

  12. My proposal by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny

    My ask slashdot question is this: what do you think would be the best possible system to replace DTS with?

    A system just like the current DTS, but with a monetary fine for whiners.

    Come on, how hard is it to set a damned clock? Just do it.

    1. Re:My proposal by oldhack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Come on, how hard is it to set a damned clock? Just do it.

      OR. Just don't do it. I like my idea much better.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:My proposal by theNetImp · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not just about setting the damn clocks, it's about messing up sleep schedules, having to re-adjust how you deal with international customers. My girlfriend lives in Japan, and for me it sucks to have to adjust twice a year.

    3. Re:My proposal by Waffle+Iron's+VCR · · Score: 5, Funny

      12:00, 12:00, 12:00, 12:00

    4. Re:My proposal by UnHolier+than+ever · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one to actually like the present system? I like to see the sun when I wake up in the winter, but there's no point in having the sun rise at 3AM in the summer, so I move the clock to have the sun later at night. I could achieve the same by moving my working hours, but moving my clock twice a year is much less of a hassle.

    5. Re:My proposal by bb5ch39t · · Score: 1

      My clock has a DST button. I set it to "standard" time. When DST comes around, I push the button and it changes to DST. When DST ends, I push it again and it changes back. My DVR automatically changes. My computer automatically changes. What doesn't automatically change is my damn wake-sleep cycle!

    6. Re:My proposal by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

      Come on, how hard is it to set a damned clock? Just do it.

      Well, I asked the question because while setting a clock isn't hard, getting everyone to synchronize is. Check out this map of who follows the rules and who does not. I live in London, which follows DST, but not at the same time that the US does. I have family living in North Carolina which follows DST and Arizona which doesn't. It's a real pain trying to figure out when to call people, especially when England switches the clocks, but the US won't for another week.

      -Wellington Grey

    7. Re:My proposal by cecille · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to compare cats and girlfriends, but my cat gets cranky about it too. He gets fed at a specific time at night, so he doesn't start whining too early in the morning. Now that it gets darker way earlier, he starts bugging me to feed him just about 1h earlier than normal. It would be great if animals could tell time.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    8. Re:My proposal by theNetImp · · Score: 1

      No worries, my friend's cat is the same way. My cat bugs me for food all the time so that doesn't affect me too much. lol

    9. Re:My proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where is the blink tag when you need it?

    10. Re:My proposal by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't believe you registered a new account just for that comment! :)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:My proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this was a funny joke and should be modded accordingly.

    12. Re:My proposal by holmedog · · Score: 1

      Pretty damn hard when that clock is attached to a $10million machine that is expected to have 99.9% uptime.

      PS. Thanks for the all the extra overtime I didn't get paid for while updating all our servers last year when you changed DST

    13. Re:My proposal by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      A bit anti-Nike, are you?

    14. Re:My proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Comma- the 16th century blink tag!

    15. Re:My proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, how hard is it to set a --censored-- clock? Just do it.

      "A"? As in, "a single"?

      There's my alarm clock, my VCR/PVR/* clock, my oven clock, my phone clock, my living room clock, my watch, my cars' clocks, and my computers' clocks.

      Then there is work, with phone, computer, and wall clocks.

      Oh, and the 2000 servers in the back room, running in all different time zones.

    16. Re:My proposal by Dark$ide · · Score: 1

      Come on, how hard is it to set a damned clock? Just do it.

      My clocks set themselves and switch from daylight saving to wintertime automatically.

      You have to blame the British for inventing daylight saving time. It was probably a good idea 80 years ago. It's not a good idea now.

      I'd vote for England to move to Central European Time and stick on it.

      --

      Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

    17. Re:My proposal by EvanED · · Score: 1

      No, I actually do too. I understand why a lot of people find it a pain, but from a selfish stance none of those reasons (usually dealing with cross-timezone stuff) really apply to me. (Actually I sort of wish that DST were all year, but in the absence of that I like it with as much DST as possible.)

    18. Re:My proposal by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      DST is a gigantic PiMA, especially when the politicians start randomly changing the start/stop dates. I run a number of automated systems for satellite communications. Accurate time is essential for calculating communications windows and Doppler shift. I have a number of applications that got totally hosed because they calculate the DST offset internally ... using the *old* dates. Being an hour early or late is catastrophic. Having a month-long blackout period is unacceptable. The apps were foisted upon me by management, and they're closed-source. One vendor doesn't support the product anymore. No hopes of editing and recompiling here, dammit.

      DST made sense long ago when factories relied on sunlight for interior lighting, and you really needed the workforce to show up during the lit hours. It has not a damned thing to do with your convenience nor with "safety." DST needs to go away. It's a burden on us all, globally. And if you comprehend the global-ness of our society, you understand that DST is completely irrelevant now.

    19. Re:My proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was just practice so you'd learn how to more efficinetly administer multiple machines. It's sort of like when important data which isn't backed up gets lost - it's a reminder that "You're Doing It Wrong".

      It took me a couple of minutes to update the time zone info file on several thousand machines last year.

    20. Re:My proposal by jabithew · · Score: 1

      Or buy a clock with a radio signal. It's no effort at all for me. Daylight savings happens without any effort on my part.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    21. Re:My proposal by MartianKillerBarbies · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know... I thought it was worth it.

      --

      "I am not a shrimp - I am a King Prawn! Pepe, "Muppets in Space"
    22. Re:My proposal by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Come on, how hard is it to set a damned clock?

      I have no idea how to set my watch. Doesn't matter, though; it's a radio watch. DCF77 does that for me.

      Having to set your clocks is a bit quaint, at least as far as anything used as an alarm is concerned.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    23. Re:My proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ask slashdot question is this: what do you think would be the best possible system to replace DTS with?

      A system just like the current DTS, but with a monetary fine for whiners.

      Come on, how hard is it to set a damned clock? Just do it.

      *A* clock?

      With all the microwaves, kitchen ranges, automobile clocks, stick-on-the-wall clocks, clocks on the weather station, clocks on the mirror, it's DAYS before all the clocks get adjusted for DST switches around here!

      And my lights are triggered by photosensors, so the only difference is that in summer I get home earlier and crank up the A/C for another full hour in the sun.

    24. Re:My proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine (well, one of them anyways), and I'm not kidding here, can tell time. She sits in front of the alarm clock and stares at it right before it goes off. And she adjusts the time she wakes us up based on DST (I have no idea how she knows the time changed, since the sun comes up at a "different" time, but she freaks me out).

    25. Re:My proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for the monetary fine for whiners if the money goes to the SysAdmin who was too busy with real issues to program the clocks on a few hundred VOIP phones to use NTP and correct current DST rules.

      The real question though isn't "how hard is it to set a clock?", it's "how many clocks do you have to set when DST rolls around?" I'm willing to bet it's more than 50%.

    26. Re:My proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s'pose we all start somewhere.
      me, i haven't gotten as far as 2 register... yet
      to celebrate i'll post a period: '.' and nothing more. :)

    27. Re:My proposal by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      me, i haven't gotten as far as 2 register... yet

      Understood. When Slashdot announced registrations, I was still in the "the Internet should be completely anonymous" camp. I came around a bit later, when they allowed submit without preview (so I sold out).

      I could'a had a low uid...

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    28. Re:My proposal by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      10 FLASH
      20 PRINT "12:00"
      30 PRINT
      40 GOTO 20

      That should do nicely. If you want multiple entries per line, put a comma at the end of line 20, and add lines 22, 24, 26, etc, that are the same as the line 20. Control-C will stop it when you have had enough.

      Remember not to exceed 40 characters total, unless you have a line 5 PRINT CHR$(4)"PR#3".

      Bonus points if you recognize the CPU this runs on.

    29. Re:My proposal by Nullav · · Score: 1

      So shift work/school schedules in Winter to make people start/end their days at different times; going to sleep at 22:00 instead of pretend-21:00 isn't going to kill you. This would also eliminate countless scheduling problems.
      Car analogy: Moving the road to get to work.

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    30. Re:My proposal by try_anything · · Score: 1

      Amen! Daylight savings time just isn't that hard. It would be harder to try to seasonally adjust EVERY schedule I deal with: my work schedule, my girlfriend's work schedule, happy hour, free swim at the pool, class times.... What about people who have recurring appointments: housekeepers, physical therapists, and psychotherapists? Would they shift everyone's appointments seasonally, or would their first morning appointment get moved to the late afternoon in the fall, and then back to the morning in the spring?

      I find it ironic (yet predictable) that Slashdotters, the people who can't figure out why Grandma isn't interested in learning grep, cringe at the terrible burden of remembering to change their clocks twice a year. I also find it predictable that so many Slashdotters are clamoring to propose their own radical, complicated, onerous schemes as remedies for a tiny inconvenience.

  13. Don't like DST? Do what I did... by Wee · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...move to Arizona. Problem solved.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  14. How about NST? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    How about "Night-Light Savings Time"?...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  15. CowboyNealTime by davidwr · · Score: 1

    It's the closest thing to God's time this side of Silicon Heaven.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  16. How about this? by TheNecromancer · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is the best way for humans to deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year and still foster coordination over disparate time zones?

    Turn on a lamp.

    --
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
    1. Re:How about this? by kingsteve612 · · Score: 0

      Best answer so far.

  17. I have the answer! by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Oh, I know! I know! Swatch time!

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:I have the answer! by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded funny?
      I know it didn't exactly caught on, but I still think it would be both better and have a higher chance of being accepted by the masses than going to UTC time, as someone else suggested.
      It's a lot easier to do math with, and it's really hard to get people to accept that 14:00 is now in the middle of the night (depending on where you live, of course)

      --
      What?
    2. Re:I have the answer! by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Actually, I agree. As a concept, it's not so bad. The big issue is getting the rest of the world to adopt it.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:I have the answer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swatch time is a good idea in theory. Its failure to catch on though I think shows how interconnected the world it NOT. If we had to interact with people in a variety of timezones on a day to day basis then an idea like Swatch time would be very useful. But when we deal with two or three timezones at most once or twice a week, it's not very useful.

  18. Abolish it..... by theNetImp · · Score: 1

    It's very inconvenient for those of us who deal with people internationally on a daily basis, messing up sleep schedules. It's a pain, I'd like to see it go away.

    1. Re:Abolish it..... by pathological+liar · · Score: 1

      ... you'll still be messing up sleep schedules. It's not like they're going to go nocturnal because it's pitch black at "9-5"

    2. Re:Abolish it..... by theNetImp · · Score: 1

      Sure my sleep schedule will probably still be out of whack, but if you set up meetings so you get x hours of sleep before you have to be up and then the clock changes giving you less time to sleep before you have to get up,

  19. Re:Don't like DST? Do what I did... by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

    Or Saskatchewan. We don't do DST either. Actually, a good solution is to just be on DST all-year long. Portions of Saskatchewan have done exactly that. Astronomically where I live should be MST/MDT. (The sun is at its zenith at 12:57 pm and it should be there at 12:00.) This way a person gets more sunlight later in the day in the summer, and the days in winter are short enough that it doesn't really matter anyway.

  20. Ah... first time I've been early for work... by phatvw · · Score: 1, Funny

    Except for all those 'daylight savings' days... lousy farmers!

    1. Re:Ah... first time I've been early for work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up in a rural area, lots of farmers didn't care a whole for DST, esp if
      they have livestock. Dairy cattle want to be milked at the same times of the
      day independent of what the clock says.

    2. Re:Ah... first time I've been early for work... by phatvw · · Score: 1

      Indeed. DST has absolutely nothing to do with farmers which makes the above Homer Simpson quote even more amusing.

  21. Standard Time is Upon us! by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, we are in Daylight Savings Time right now. We are getting ready to go back to Standard Time.

    1. Re:Standard Time is Upon us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you're in the northern hemisphere. Don't assume the original poster is too.

    2. Re:Standard Time is Upon us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, hello.
      Not if you live in the southern hemisphere.
      We just started DST 2 weeks ago.
      Think outside the square, North America is not the whole planet.

    3. Re:Standard Time is Upon us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, we are in Daylight Saving (no S) Time right now.

    4. Re:Standard Time is Upon us! by againjj · · Score: 1

      Unless you are in the southern hemisphere.

  22. Just shift business hours. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just shift business hours.

  23. Wrong! by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    The issue with DST is not that it's inconvenient, it's that it's insufficiently precise! We should be changing the time every day (at least!) to make sure our time is as accurate as possible to the length of the day. Every day, 12 noon should be when the Sun is directly overhead, no matter where you are.

    Sure, this means changing time zones almost continuously while travelling, and at least daily while remaining stationary, but at least we won't have to deal with the confusion that comes from discovering that the Sun is directly overhead at 12:00:34 instead of 12 noon sharp! How can we call ourselves intelligent beings when our time system is so woefully inaccurate most of the time?

    So, scrap daylight savings time and replace it with a system of several thousand time zones, each updated daily based on the predicted "high noon" for that particular day at that particular location. If the prediction ends up being off by a few microseconds on a particular day, just change the time to correct it right then and there! Sure, wristwatches will become orders of magnitude more complex, but it's the only way to have a truly sane and accurate system of time measurement. And after all, isn't that what we all really want here?

    1. Re:Wrong! by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      The sun is never directly over head on most days in most places.

      -Peter

    2. Re:Wrong! by oldhack · · Score: 2, Funny

      How can we call ourselves intelligent beings when our time system is so woefully inaccurate most of the time?

      If we were intelligent, we would have set the clock to "lunch time" permanently.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    3. Re:Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about we start phasing in location-aware clocks/watches? They auto-calibrate via gps every day or week, depending on how precise you really need them to be. No more DST!

      Next, we update calendars to remove those pesky leap years!

    4. Re:Wrong! by viralbus · · Score: 1

      But that doesn't deal with getting you up earlier during summer than during winter.
      I suggest defining 6am to be the time when the Sun rises. Yes, that means the day length wouldn't be constant, but I'm sure that wouldn't be a real issue these days.

    5. Re:Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should be using stardates by now:
      Stardate Calculator

    6. Re:Wrong! by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Obligatory: "Time is an illusion, lunchtime, doubly so." D. Adams

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    7. Re:Wrong! by mevets · · Score: 1

      Every day, sunrise should be at 6:00am and sunset at 6:00pm. Fixed time is dreary.

    8. Re:Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking exactly the same thing, of course the transition would be difficult but I don't think it would be that hard creating new clocks that take into account the rate of speed that the "sun moves across the sky". Just move the current clock forward a few minutes or seconds every day in spring and wind it back a few minutes or seconds every day in autumn.

    9. Re:Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's take this to the next logical step and change the lengths of the hours dynamically so that sunup and sundown always occur at 6am and 6pm, respectively.

      It would sure make the workday go faster during the winter, and then we could spend the longer nighttime hours trying to sleep off our Seasonal Affective Disorder.

  24. We should all wear Atomic Clocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grab a cesium atom and slap it on your wrist.

    1. Re:We should all wear Atomic Clocks. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Grab a cesium atom and slap it on your wrist.

      >What time is it?
      >I don't know, I can't calibrate my crystal oscillator, since I only have one atom to excite.

      You're going to need more than a single cesium atom, there bub.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  25. Saves lives? by skirmish666 · · Score: 1

    You can't eliminate daylight savings and still have the power savings it brings. Setting the time forward permanently means people will be using lights at 7AM instead of PM. Moving to an equatorial region would eliminate the need for DST but it's more convenient to set your clocks back / forward every six months.

    --
    Sigger than your average
    1. Re:Saves lives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You can't eliminate daylight savings and still have the power savings it brings.

      Silly rabbit - of course you can. You just change your *schedule* instead of changing all the clocks!

    2. Re:Saves lives? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      If my daylight savings account had better interest rates I'd be all for it. Really I suggest we migrate to good growth stock daylight mutual funds.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:Saves lives? by profplump · · Score: 1

      You're assuming there's a power savings. That's not known to be true. In fact there's some evidence that it actually *wastes* power.

    4. Re:Saves lives? by dwye · · Score: 1

      Why the "Saves Lives?" subject? Everyone knows that DST kills children waiting for the school bus in the dark. That is why it isn't DST during winter and double DST during summer; eventually the trade-off becomes too severe.

    5. Re:Saves lives? by skirmish666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, OP listed a benefit of DST as saving lives...

      --
      Sigger than your average
  26. DST Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't that be "Daylight savings time is about to end"?

    1. Re:DST Ending by Dark$ide · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "Daylight savings time is about to end"?

      Depends which side of the Equator you live on. Those poor folks south of the Equator will be just starting daylight saving (if it's used in their country).

      --

      Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

  27. Orbital Mirrors by schwit1 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Give me daylight 14 hours per day, 6am - 8pm. Move them between hemispheres or to emergency locations as needed. Productivity goes up, which pays for the mirrors.

    DST becomes unnecessary.

    1. Re:Orbital Mirrors by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      While, the geek in me is enchanted by the mega-engineering aspect of your solution, the part of me that can't get to sleep with the sun up is trembling in fear that somehow this will actually come to pass.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Orbital Mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, you think greenhouse gases are a problem, what do you think the effects of changing the ammount of sunlight hitting the earth will be?
      You would be able to do this with a fixed number of mirrors since you are just countering the effects of the earths tilt. It would be difficult at the poles though as you would have to block out the sun to shorten the days during the summer months. Theoreticaly I guess you could do it with one perfect mirror aligned to the rotational axis of the earth and a single giant screen to block out the real sun. Of course you'd get perpetual equinox then so the world would be forever spring and fall.

    3. Re:Orbital Mirrors by emandres · · Score: 1

      Give me daylight 14 hours per day, 6am - 8pm. Move them between hemispheres or to emergency locations as needed. Productivity goes up, which pays for the mirrors. DST becomes unnecessary.

      Meanwhile, animals everywhere slowly go from intrigued, to confused, to blind rage as there circadian rhythms are ripped away from them. You know, other than the whole possible destruction of society thing, this might be a good idea.

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    4. Re:Orbital Mirrors by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

      While, the geek in me is enchanted by the mega-engineering aspect of your solution, the part of me that can't get to sleep with the sun up is trembling in fear that somehow this will actually come to pass.

      Actually, there's a very good reason why this hasn't come to pass, and why it never will...

      Basically, the amount of micrometeorites and orbital debris in space makes it incredibly likely that a mirror high enough up to provide light at times of day when it's not available, and to stay in orbit, and also large enough to provide a significant amount of light would be smashed before too long...

      Of course, the practical aspects of retrieving the broken pieces and repairing or replacing the broken mirror aren't such a major problem: of more concern is the inherent misfortune brought on by the destruction of a mirror. Being a larger mirror means more bad luck, but it's still distributed over the same seven-year cycle... When this kind of massive orbital mirror breaks we'd experience unprecedented levels of chaotic worldwide misfortune - and this misfortune would compound the probability that any replacement mirror would be broken, thus continuing the cycle...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    5. Re:Orbital Mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about we wait until the global warming fears change back to worries about an approaching ice age before we start adding that much more energy to earth.

    6. Re:Orbital Mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many years of bad luck would that bring?

    7. Re:Orbital Mirrors by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      How many years of bad luck would that bring?

      It all depends on how many times the mirror is rebuilt...

      Like I said - smashing an orbital mirror would bring 7 years of profoundly bad luck (due to the size of the mirror) - which in turn would make it more likely that the mirror would be smashed again if repaired... So if they rebuilt the mirror a couple times, ignoring the dangers of compound bad luck, we could be looking at more than 20 years of bleak misfortune distributed across the entire Earth.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  28. Picture this... by qoncept · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're a farmer, or construction worker, or anyone who does his business in daylight. During the months of short days, you are up and ready to work at sun up every day and need to work for 8 hours. In the summer, you can still get to the bank and do your business. But in the winter, without DST, you're stuck at work until 5:00pm and can't. DST isn't baseless. It caters to a small group of people that can't adjust their hours.

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:Picture this... by theNetImp · · Score: 1

      Most banks are open until at least 7pm one day a week. Most banks have drop off boxes to drop off money, there are also ATMs for depositing money. This may have been the case 15 years ago, but there are plenty of options for construction workers and farmers and anyone who does business during daylight that this excuse is now invalid.

    2. Re:Picture this... by Cadallin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeah, not so much.

      See we have this new thing called "Electric Lighting." It seems now that crazy cat edison has enabled us to pretty much light up any outdoor area; no matter what time it is! Crazy, I know, but true.

    3. Re:Picture this... by Romancer · · Score: 1

      That's why a lot of banks like wells fargo and bank of america and US bank have asjusted their hours to extend past the 5pm standard. It serves them since they get more happy customers and your example is now moot. Wells Fargo closes at 7pm in the three locations I know of in Reno NV. Just have the banking world acknowledge that there is no longer a set time they need to be open physically since their online presence and a reasonable call center can handle most anything already. Have a couple tellers available 24hrs through the tube driven drive through. No risk and all gain once people get used to it.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    4. Re:Picture this... by ericrost · · Score: 1, Troll

      Hell, I work in an office and can't "get to the bank to do my business" much less the podunk post office. The bank is open 10-5 and the Post office 9-3. Wish I could make a full time salary for those hours. Ever heard of saturdays?

    5. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Outdoor lighting for farming and construction would require some hefty light.

      One thing sunlight comes with, is a low cost price tag. Oh, right... that's 'free'.

    6. Re:Picture this... by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 1

      DST affects the summer, get it? The winter daylight hours will still be short, and the times at which the sun rises and sets, in winter, won't change with or without DST.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
    7. Re:Picture this... by residieu · · Score: 4, Funny

      These places close at around 2 on Saturdays, who is even AWAKE at that point?

    8. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, farmers don't work 8-hour days. They work 14+ hour days during busy times, and less other times. They could care less about DST.

    9. Re:Picture this... by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I take it you don't have kids? The not-so-small group of people who do would rather have their kids going to school in the morning in daylight, not darkness.

      --
      Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
    10. Re:Picture this... by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      It caters to a small group of people...

      Pretty much says it all.

      Maybe they should just learn to deal.

    11. Re:Picture this... by bendodge · · Score: 1

      Hooray for businesses catering to their customers! No govt interference needed.
      Tag this 'replacewithnothing' and write your congresscritter.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    12. Re:Picture this... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      errr... How, exactly, does DST give them more daylight?
      The short days are standard time, BTW.
      In the winter, start at sun rise, end at sunset. It doesn't matter that the numbers on your clock read, and it doesn't matter that the hands on the watch say. All that matters is you get X amount of work done.

      For me, all this means is I get to drive into a sunset for 3 weeks..again.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Picture this... by qoncept · · Score: 1

      Nope, I 1) don't have kids, 2) hadn't considered that, 3) don't care and 4) never stated an opinion on DST one way or the other. (As it turns out, I also don't care about that. The only time it causes me a problem is when I lose an hour of sleep.)

      --
      Whale
    14. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Farmers are generally opposed to DST because we cannot begin work during harvest until the sun has dried out the crops sufficiently from the dew the previous night. Therefore, when DST is in effect, we can't start working in the fields until an hour later, and must end work when the sun goes down, which is now an hour later. This means we don't stop working until 9:00 instead of 8:00. Since we would all like to be able to get in an hour earlier, but still complete a full day of work, we are not big fans of when the clock artificially shifts to make us stay at work later.

    15. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are such, work based on daylight and put in your elapsed work time. Who cares what the numbers on the wall are when you start and finish so long as the daylight and duration are right?

    16. Re:Picture this... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      If I'm conscious at 2PM on Saturday, it's because I've been up all night and all morning.

      And I've been too busy to go to the bank, so that doesn't help. #8^(

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    17. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Winter is when daylight savings is not in effect. Your whole argument is pointless.

    18. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... DST isn't baseless. It caters to a small group of people that can't adjust their hours.

      Actually they can. DST proves it. They adjust their hours at least twice every year because of it.

    19. Re:Picture this... by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I take it you don't have kids? The not-so-small group of people who do would rather have their kids going to school in the morning in daylight, not darkness.

      Jeepers! Where do your kids go to school? The sun rises at around 5:30AM during the summer where I live. If DST were not in effect, that would be 4:30AM. What kind of school do your kids go to that the have to get up that early? Most of the schools around here start at least 2-2.5 hours AFTER sunrise, assuming they're even open in the summer.

      You ARE aware that DST affects only summer hours, right?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    20. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is this other thing called DIRECT DEPOSIT.

    21. Re:Picture this... by emandres · · Score: 1

      Yes, sunlight is free... unless, of course, you live in Springfield

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    22. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... DST is during the summer. Ending DST would not affect winter working hours.

    23. Re:Picture this... by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      Most banks are open until at least 7pm one day a week.

      I wish I lived in an enlightened country such as yours. Over here (Uruguay), bankers and most public offices are open only 4 hs a day for public (6 or 8 if it's the central office).

      Which means us private workers usually have to take time off from work (or lunchtime) to do any paperwork at all.

      In my previous work there was a special 4 hs allowance for that included in the timesheet !

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    24. Re:Picture this... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      In the summer, you can still get to the bank and do your business. But in the winter, without DST, you're stuck at work until 5:00pm and can't. DST isn't baseless.

      on my planet banks and most places still close at 5:00pm. DST does not do crap for me other than screw up my sleeping for 2 weeks after each change.

      Where do you live that banks go "IT's DST! we stay open until 6:00!"

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    25. Re:Picture this... by entgod · · Score: 1

      So wouldn't it be reasonable for that small group of people to just change their working hours according to the season instead of making us all fiddle with our clocks?

    26. Re:Picture this... by cuby · · Score: 1

      Double yeah... Let me charge you the light that my Father needs to go around in his farm an night... Maybe some little gnome lamps would be fine...

      --
      Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
    27. Re:Picture this... by jvberg · · Score: 1

      "But in the winter, without DST"

      We are off of DST in the Winter.
      We are on it now...
      So this argument holds no daylight.

      Also, from wikipedia: "Adding daylight to afternoons benefits retailing, sports, and other activities that exploit sunlight after working hours,[2] but causes problems for farming, entertainment and other occupations tied to the sun."

      Seems the exact oposite...

    28. Re:Picture this... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > You're a farmer...

      True. And like most farmers, I think DST is really stupid.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    29. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a farmer once, or to be more precise, I worked on a farm.

      We ignored daylight savings. Cows get to know what time it is, and when it's time to be milked. They don't like waiting an extra hour, or getting milked early, both of which mean reduced yield.

    30. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I'm a vampire, I do my business at night, and this system bites!

    31. Re:Picture this... by timster · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? I see both farmers and construction workers with hefty lights working at night all the time. In fact, it really seems like major freeway work is hardly ever done during the day anymore.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    32. Re:Picture this... by jfgagnon · · Score: 0

      You think the cow cares about the hour of the day?

    33. Re:Picture this... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Then instead of working 9-17 work 8-16, duh.

      (You Americans have that silly breakfast/lunch/dinner system so add the lunch break time to the above.)

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    34. Re:Picture this... by Cadallin · · Score: 1
      Wait, what? +2 Informative? For pointing out that artificial lighting lets you work in the dark? What a world.

      The other major point is that, while at the time DST was adopted (in addition to being a time before cheap and easy access to bright artificial lighting) a far greater proportion of the population was involved in farming. Like it or not, the actual percentage of Americans involved in farming (especially small family farms) is now vanishingly small. I really and truly doubt the real costs (including a large spike in traffic accidents and a corresponding spike in accident related fatalities) of catering to that tiny minority are worth the benefits.

      And as has been pointed out elsewhere, complaints about the cost of artificial lighting for agriculture and construction would probably have some weight, except that the practice is already incredibly common.

    35. Re:Picture this... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      How many lights does it take to light up a corn farm?

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    36. Re:Picture this... by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

      THIS is what I'm aware of:

      These days, the sun rises later and later, and if the clocks don't change soon, they'll be going to school in the dark.

      So its NON-existence affects winter hours, right?

      --
      Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
    37. Re:Picture this... by Darkk · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not true. You actually have more daylight hours during the summer than in the winter so what is the point of DST?

      We have grasped the fact the seasonal changes we can't control so we just deal with it.

      So for construction worker that needs to work even in dark can put up lights. It's not uncommon for road construction workers to work midnight till 6am so it wouldn't disrupt traffic too much. So where does DST help? Nadda!

      They really need to drop DST, period.

    38. Re:Picture this... by bagsc · · Score: 1

      Farmers and construction workers aren't so stupid they can't tell when the sun is up.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    39. Re:Picture this... by supermank17 · · Score: 1

      I'm a little confused here; how does DST help this situation? It doesn't affect the winter months at all.

    40. Re:Picture this... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      These days, the sun rises later and later, and if the clocks don't change soon, they'll be going to school in the dark.
      So its NON-existence affects winter hours, right?


      Sunrise on the last day of DST (Nov 01) where I live will be at 07:55. Sunrise on Dec 31 will be at 07:51. Four minutes difference is all it makes. Sorry, but your kids are going to school in the dark regardless of what happens.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    41. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bank has some sort of intarweb thingy, and little Access The Money boxes that they've scattered all over the town. Heck, I don't have to talk to tellers anymore. mebbe you should switch... Informative? I've got boogers that are more informative.

    42. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many lights does it take to light up a corn farm?

      Haven't spent much time in the country, have you? You only need to light the part you're looking at. That's why farm machinery has lights. Farmers don't care what the clock says. If the field is finally dry and crop needs to come in, the combine runs 24/7.

    43. Re:Picture this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DST affects the summer, get it?

      No, you don't get it. I don't care if they use DST or not. I just want them too keep one system all year round so I don't have jet lag twice a year. I'm pretty sure the costs from increased car accidents from clock changes far outweigh any power savings. It takes over a week for rush hour to recover from this stupid clock change. They can keep it on DST all year and I'd be happy. GET IT, smartass? It's about changing the clocks twice a year, it's not about doing something special in summer.

    44. Re:Picture this... by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but your kids are going to school in the dark regardless of what happens.

      a) without the clock change, they'd be mushrooms longer

      b) a long winter break mitigates the latest sunrises

      --
      Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
  29. Throw away all the clocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clocks and watches cause stress. Let's abolish time zones altogether.

  30. It's about to END! by csoto · · Score: 1

    Not begin! you insensitive CLOD!

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  31. No it isn't by sesshomaru · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Standard Time is nearly upon us, Daylight Savings Time is ending.

    Here's my favorite anti-daylight savings time page:

    End Day Light Savings Time

    I don't like Daylight Saving Time, or as I call it "Pretend it's an hour later than it is," and will be glad when the clock in my car doesn't make me do addition to remember what time it is (I refuse to adjust it for this nonsense.) This silly dance we do every year twice.

    My alarm clock is a self-adjusting atomic model (not internally of course, it readjusts itself via radio signal from the U.S. Atomic Clock in Colorado).

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    1. Re:No it isn't by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Pretend it's an hour later than it is,"

      Time measurement is an artificial construct. The time is when we say it is, there is no pretending it's a different hour.

      If you don't want to take the 10 seconds to adjust your clock, then fine but don't whine about doing the 'math' in your head. If adding or subtracting 1 in you head cause so much trouble, find some other place to post.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:No it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Betaversers think you have it bad with DST? In Alphaverse, there are 90 minutes in an hour and 90 seconds in a minute. Try keeping trans-universal events in sync on either side of the Link.

      Gammaverse has it right by not caring about time at all.

    3. Re:No it isn't by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      I don't like Daylight Saving Time, or as I call it "Pretend it's an hour later than it is," and will be glad when the clock in my car doesn't make me do addition to remember what time it is (I refuse to adjust it for this nonsense.) This silly dance we do every year twice.

      Perhaps you'd be less angry if you'd just adjust your car's clock twice/year rather than doing addition several dozen (hundred?) times per summer?

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    4. Re:No it isn't by againjj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      End Standard Time, or as I like to call it, "pretend it's some unknown amount of time later or earlier than it really is". Seriously, solar time for a long time was considered true time, and there was resistance to going to standard time. All our time conventions are for convenience and other such benefits anyhow -- if DST increases benefits, use it, otherwise don't. It's all arbitrary anyway.

  32. Alternative system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My ask slashdot question is this: what do you think would be the best possible system to replace DTS with?

    The most commonly accepted alternatives to DTS are Dolby Digital and SDDS.

  33. Daylight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this daylight you speak of? I thought slashdotters just lived in their server farms?

  34. Re:Don't like DST? Do what I did... by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    Good idea. Actually scary timing on that comment (and this thread). Want to help me finish loading my pod as I return to the Valley of the Sun? I always like to point out that DST never does any favors to a state where the summer months need extra sunlight like John McCain needs extra sunlight.

  35. DST is useless by Talgrath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As others have pointed out (http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/pubs/fulltext/nrcc49212/nrcc49212.pdf), Daylight Savings Time likely doesn't save us any energy. This, of course, makes sense as if people are getting up earlier to avoid it being dark when they get home, they're still using electricity in the morning which is now dark. In short, the only way that daylight savings time in the modern day is beneficial to anyone is people who want to play sports or do something else outdoors after work. Not only that, but studies have shown that Daylight Savings Time often actually costs companies money due to needing to change clocks, employees who show up late/early to work during time changes and computer errors resulting from time changes. The solution, is to abolish Daylight Savings Time and save us all some time, money and bother.

    1. Re:DST is useless by Stormwave0 · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out (http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/pubs/fulltext/nrcc49212/nrcc49212.pdf), Daylight Savings Time likely doesn't save us any energy.

      I will admit that I haven't read the full text of that paper but I have read the conclusion. It certainly does not suggest that DST does not save us energy. In fact, it says there is not enough data to draw a conclusion. The data is either outdated, conflicting or based on constraining assumptions. Point being, don't try to twist your sources into saying something they're certainly not!

      That being said, I view myself as a proponent of DST. Yes, it has its flaws (switching clocks is annoying), but I do believe it saves energy. I notice a lot of people here say "get up earlier or change business hours if you want more light." Do you really think that would work? We have a hard enough time getting people to go out and vote in a presidential election every 4 years and you want them to change their sleeping schedules? No, I don't have that much faith in others. DST standardizes everyone waking up earlier because most people wouldn't be bothered to on their own.

      I suppose my assumption that it saves energy could be wrong, but I can't say I've seen a conclusive paper that gives a good argument either way.

  36. One Time to Rule Them All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AKA Farm Time. Tell all time using GMT+5. Let people adjust to the fact that time is just a number and it shouldn't change the way they live and work.

  37. Live near equator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The solution is that all world population live near Equator

    1. Re:Live near equator by philspear · · Score: 1

      Of the sun.

    2. Re:Live near equator by pclminion · · Score: 1

      As an added benefit, the concentration of mass near the equator would increase the earth's moment of inertia and make the day longer...

  38. Universal Metric time by bonkeydcow · · Score: 1

    Some sort of universal time. I mean who says we need to go to work at 8am. If should matter to me if I'm going into the office at 18:00 UMT.

  39. Why have time zones at all? by doroshjt · · Score: 1

    Why not have everyone on UTC? If you in New York Open your store 0900 in the morning, why can't you just open the west coast store at 1200 in the morning in LA? Just becaue we are use to having things open 9 - 5 in a local time zone there is no reason why that hours can't shift? It'll probably happen after the US switches to metric, but thats my dream.

    1. Re:Why have time zones at all? by Malc · · Score: 1

      If you're using UTC, then you open your store at 2pm in New York, and 5pm in LA. Don't you know that London is the centre of the world?

  40. Don't like DTS? Do what I did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I replaced all my DTS with SSIS.

  41. No no -I- have the answer! by philspear · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here are a few real alternatives to daylight savings time:

    -Daylight wasting time
    -Nightlight saving time
    -Dayheavy saving time
    -Some permutation of the above terrible puns

    1. Re:No no -I- have the answer! by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here are a few real alternatives to daylight savings time:

      -Daylight wasting time
      -Nightlight saving time
      -Dayheavy saving time
      -Some permutation of the above terrible puns

      You forgot...

      • Miller Time
      • Clobberin' Time
      • Medieval Times
      • Half Time
      • Four-Four Time
      • Overtime
      • Groovy Time for a Movie Time (followed immediately by "Linoleum Knife")
      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    2. Re:No no -I- have the answer! by Tycho · · Score: 1

      What about metric time? I actually have a (non-serious) system for it, I am also sure that there are several serious methods too. First off, separate units for a full day and another for total number of years would be needed. Seconds would be preserved under this system, and would continue to be used for elapsed time. The time during the day would also be measured as elapsed time and be measured in parts of a day. Consequently, one day unit would be the base unit. When refering to a specific time during the day a figure in milidays would be used. This would not be totally unusual as currently there are 1440 seconds in a day and 1000 milidays in a day, additional precision is easily added if needed under this system. This system could be adapted for other locations, like Mars where the length of the martian day is not reasonably close to 24 hours, making a new unit of course. This would not be too bad as one would just have to check the units used and convert as needed. Similar to the day, the year would also have additional precision added to it, so an acceptable value of the year would be 2009.3294. The year would be the measurement of time over the course of days, months, and years, in the strange case this system would actually be used. I realize that this system would almost certainly require the use of conversion software and thus hardware of some type, among other related issues. While 9-5 workers may have trouble, those with variable schedules might not know the difference.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    3. Re:No no -I- have the answer! by caluml · · Score: 1

      And of course - Hammer Time.

  42. End the Madness. No Timezones. by monk · · Score: 1

    Let's just all use 24 hour UTC. Who cares if sunrise is at 12:00? Or better yet use a decimal system. Why are we still using a base 60 system invented by the Sumerians?

    --
    [-- Trust the Monkey --]
    1. Re:End the Madness. No Timezones. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because we are a spinning globe.

      The way we measure time is fine.
      DST is no longer needed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:End the Madness. No Timezones. by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Why are we still using a base 60 system invented by the Sumerians?

      Because replacing ten billion computer clocks is a bit expensive?

    3. Re:End the Madness. No Timezones. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      There are 86400 seconds in a mean solar day. So there would be, what? ten "hours", each 8640 seconds long, made up of ten "minutes" of 864 seconds? Then what? The minute would be divided into ten parts of 86 seconds each?

      But wait, what about siderial days. If we're ignoring the sun, shouldn't we care about the length of time it takes for the earth to turn once on its axis? That's 86164 seconds, which doesn't divide nicely by ten at all. Or perhaps you want to redefine the length of the second, one of the base units of the metric system. Well, say goodbye to millions of science books, because quite a lot of formulas and calculations depend on the second being only and exactly as long as it is.

      Of course, that only syncs up the day. There are still 365.2425 days in a year. (Of course, that's mean solar days in a mean tropical year.) Maybe we should use the siderial year as well, being 365.2463 solar days long.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  43. Well, duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I propose replacing DTS with DST.

  44. Re:How about this? SAD by Haoie · · Score: 1

    Too much artificial light isn't good for you, as most of you would know.

    It's attributed to to Seasonal Affective Disorder.

    And also, pasty faced nerd syndrome.

    --
    If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
  45. Just an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not make an 1/2h switch instead of a whole hour and keep it so all year long?

  46. DTS already replaced... by jddj · · Score: 5, Funny

    what do you think would be the best possible system to replace DTS with?

    I think DTS disappeared with the release of SQL Server 2005. I'm pretty sure it's all .NET code now...

    1. Re:DTS already replaced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean TDS ?

    2. Re:DTS already replaced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think DTS disappeared with the release of SQL Server 2005. I'm pretty sure it's all .NET code now...

      So what happens to all my DTS movies then? Am I stuck with crappy Dolby now?

    3. Re:DTS already replaced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DTS is now SSIS i think

    4. Re:DTS already replaced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Microsoft would be in favor of this. They have decreed that the .Net switchover dates for all prior years was in fact the current switchover dates (e.g. Nov 2nd 2003).

      It's a simple step to decreeing that they didn't change at all.

    5. Re:DTS already replaced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, DTS is still around; us audiophiles prefer DTS-HD Master but it's just a patch between the source audio and the output of the lossy DTS codec. (yes, I realise we're talking about different things but in the spirit of mutual confusion I think it's only fair!)

  47. There are better ways of handling this by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    DST is the worst possible way to handle the daylight difference. Instead of changing the clocks, businesses should just say "Summer hours: 9am-5pm, winter hours: 8am-4pm. It's the same dang thing, except you don't have to be going "oh, they are in Arizona, and they don't observe DST" or "Wait, UK DST starts a week later, so they aren't in the office yet..." etc.

    The way we do DST now is like saying that the centimeter is a little too small for measuring fence posts, so let's just add one centimeter to the measurement. So now 1cm=2cm, and 2cm=3cm. But then someone else says they should add .5cm, and someone else wants the rule to apply to gear boxes AND fence posts...

    1. Re:There are better ways of handling this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, what the fuck are you talking about?

  48. Just how old is DST? by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    What is the best way for humans to deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year and still foster coordination over disparate time zones?"

    Yes how on Earth did we survive the 2 billion year evolution to the point where we could develope DST???
    I this if we just plain scrapped it everything would go on as usual, most of us work in a building of some form and they come with lights these days. As for farmer I think the 5,000,000 candle power on a combine haverister just about does the trick.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    1. Re:Just how old is DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, you go back to the 20 year lifespan humans had before DST, and use a rock to both kill your food and start the fire used to cook it. I prefer the benefits of current society, which may or may not be directly related to the implementation of DST. ;)

  49. Standardize World Time by Efialtis · · Score: 1

    In this day and age, there is no reason we should even still be cut up into time-zones. There is no need for a leap year (or a leap anything...) and we should definitely not have "daylight savings". We should go to something like "internet time" where the day (currently 24 hours) is equally divided and the time is measured at the exact moment around the world. So instead of having 5 pm Mountain time be 6 pm central, it would simply be 17, or 85, or whatever the numeric representation is... 1 might be in the middle of the night, or in the mid morning, or in the evening...but it would always be 1 at that very instant/event every day, and it would be for everyone. Then there is no worry about daylight savings... companies can decide when they want to open, when they want to do business (we are open from 8 to 16 - which would be the same 8-16 all over the planet...) and if a company decides to be open an hour earlier or close an hour later...then that is their deal...everyone will still be working within 2 hours of eachother, really no different than things are right now...

    --
    --E--
    1. Re:Standardize World Time by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      There is no need for a leap year (or a leap anything...)

      The purpose of leap years has nothing to do with timezones; it's to synchronize the calendar. Our year is 365 and 1/4 days long. Without leap years the days of the year would drift in relation to annual events like the solstices and equinoxes, and the seasons. Over a long enough period, winter would fall in July and summer in February. Adding a day every four years resets the calendar.

      [extended rules for leap years, like skipping leap years every century, except every four centuries, unless it's a millenium... correct for the fact that it isn't exactly 1/4 day extra].

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:Standardize World Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not think you have thought your cunning plan all the way through.

      Either that or your troll-fu is strong.

    3. Re:Standardize World Time by pclminion · · Score: 1

      That would completely suck. Suppose you're an international traveller. You want to meet some clients at lunchtime. What time do you set the appointment for? You shouldn't have to calculate the precise number of miles you've travelled from your home in order to figure out the adjustment that "17" is noon at your place and "3" is noon at theirs. That's just awful.

      Not to mention, how do you specify exact times anyway without also simultaneously specifying the precise longitude of the event? Your plan would eliminate timezones, essentially dividing the earth into an infinite number of zones. It's not really that hard to keep track of only 24 of them -- you can assume that somebody living 50 miles west of you is, on average, in the same timezone as you. But with your system nobody has a freaking clue what time you are talking about without doing mathematics. If the longitude of the location is not precisely known, then the time of the event isn't precisely known either.

      It gives me a headache even thinking about it.

    4. Re:Standardize World Time by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      jjohnson wrote and included with a post:

      There is no need for a leap year (or a leap anything...)

      The purpose of leap years has nothing to do with timezones; it's to synchronize the calendar. Our year is 365 and 1/4 days long. Without leap years the days of the year would drift in relation to annual events like the solstices and equinoxes, and the seasons. Over a long enough period, winter would fall in July and summer in February. Adding a day every four years resets the calendar.

      [extended rules for leap years, like skipping leap years every century, except every four centuries, unless it's a millenium... correct for the fact that it isn't exactly 1/4 day extra].

      I agree about the need for a leap year for the above reason. The current system ensures that the calendar will remain in sync with the solar year for centuries.

      In a related topic to the above, I think what is needed is an adjustment to the calendar to simplify the number of days in each month. One simpler scheme:

      • Twelve months of 28 days and then
      • One month of 29 days (or 30 days during a leap year)

      The above schemes would greatly simplify the calendar over our current scheme of: 31, 28/29, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31). It would also ensure that every month (except for the last one) has four of each day (Mondays, Tuesdays, and so on).

      As far as the Daylight Saving Time (DST), I agree that it needs to be eliminated due to the confusion it creates and the difficulty it creates in adjusting many people's internal clocks. My own experience has been that while it is fairly easy for my internal clock to return to standard time, it takes me several weeks for my internal clock to fully adjust backward to DST.

      As far as replacing local time with Universal Time, I think there would be a great deal of resistance to it, and I don't think that it's needed locally. Rather, I think it would be more workable to use both, local time that is based on the sun for local transactions, and Universal time for non-local communication and transactions. Using Universal Time when needed would eliminate much of the confusion across long distances.

    5. Re:Standardize World Time by Efialtis · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you missed my point. There is no need to have timezones. There is no need to have a leap anything. The earth moves at a specific rate, 0.9856 degrees per day (around the sun) 15.04 degrees an hour (on axis) So why do we need to have 365.25 days a year? why not adjust the way we measure time to compensate? computers can give us an accurate rate of measure, which will remove the need to leap anything at any time. Sure, we will have to relearn how to tell time, but the same thing happens when people move from STANDARD to METRIC ...and they haven't died for the experience yet... Doing things this way gives people the ability to start their day whenever they want to...and business could set their own hours, and even emulate "standard time" or "daylight saving time" as they so choose. Why do we need to centralize this, when it really doesn't help...if it is pitch black when I get up, I turn on a light, get dressed and go to work with my headlights on...if it is light out side when I get up, I still have to get dressed and drive to work...and save what, an HOUR'S energy for not turning on my light, or using my headlights?

      --
      --E--
    6. Re:Standardize World Time by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      We need to have 365.25 days a year because a day is the most immediate, obvious time division in human affairs. You're not going to change that. If you created some arbitrary standard of time that wasn't tied to the day, no one would pay any attention to it. Given that a day is a basic unit, you need leap years to synchronize the calendar. I don't know why you'd want to change this--no one has any real problems with it.

      Daylight Savings Time is silly, IMHO, but it really has nothing to do with leap years.

      Funny you should mention the conversion from standard to metric. The U.S. still runs on standard despite half a century of trying to switch.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  50. Nuke it! by jordandeamattson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Daylight Savings Time has enormous costs and very little value in return.

    We should get read of it and say, "Good riddance..."

    If there are issues with available daylight in a particular area, then the times of events should be adjusted accordingly. If it is to dark at 7 AM for kids to go out in order to reach school at 8 AM, then push back the start time of school, etc., to 9 AM.

    In reality, this is what Daylight Savings Time does, but at much greater cost.

    1. Re:Nuke it! by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, 'cos that would be easier than just adjusting a clock.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Nuke it! by lxs · · Score: 1

      Daylight Savings Time has enormous costs and very little value in return.

      Can you put a number on these "enormous costs" or do you simply assume this because of your aversion to the government meddling with your precious clock?

      Are we talking millions? Billions? Generations scarred for life? Inquiring minds want to know.

    3. Re:Nuke it! by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      Much greater cost? With DST, everyone is synchronized. No one changes their schedule, they simply slide it forward or back one hour all together. Your proposal would mean that instead of everyone being on the same page, people with kids have one schedule, farmers have their schedule, 9-5 people have their schedule... It would work, I guess, but I don't know how it would be easier or cheaper than what we do now.

      Like the other people posting ideas, you're preserving DST but moving the burden from everyone to just a few people, which IMO *doubles* the overall burden- both parties in a scheduling mixup are going to be inconvenienced instead of everything running smoothly 363 days of the year.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  51. Not to be a troll... by kellyb9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...although some will call me one. I couldn't care less, this arguement comes up twice a year, and twice a year I don't really care. I've heard all the arguements and everything, but truth be told, the switch doesn't bother me that much. The only day that really concerns me is the one where we turn time back, the extra hour is always nice. The winter time is just a pain because I like to leave work and still have some daylight - but that's just me.

    1. Re:Not to be a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you are...

      you say 'you don't really care' yet you talk about the only day that 'concerns' you is the one when we turn back time.

      Not really caring is OK. Saying you don't care about something (being a Troll or DST) yet then saying something 'concerns' you seems to me like you do care. Otherwise, don't post?

    2. Re:Not to be a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *I'm posting AC because I Modded you up, almost entirely due to your correct use of the the phrase "I couldn't care less", vs the normal "I could care less", which annoys me, personally, since I am a Grammar Nazi. Well done!

  52. Where did that S come from by onkelonkel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the interest of Getting Things Right, I'll point out that it's "Daylight Saving Time" not "Daylight Savings Time".

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  53. Re:DST is ending - only in Northern hemisphere by yabos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Southern hemisphere will be coming into summer soon and lots of countries appear to use DST in our northern winter months.
    http://www.timeanddate.com/time/dst2008b.html

  54. Just make sunrise 6am by misterjava66 · · Score: 1

    Although it has been sudjested that this was ben franklin's idea.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time

    I say, just make sunrise 6am everywhere.
    We did not have the technology to do this in pre-industrial times, but
    we did do this in ancient times, and we can do it again.

    It would maximize light saving, it would maximize night availability,
    and only result in the fact that it is a different time in EVERY town in the world
    just about.

    So what, it would just require some websites where you could enter where you are, where they are,
    and know the time and time-diff. If I'm in Michigan and you are in Alabama. Sometimes I ahead of
    you, sometimes you are ahead of me. Sweet!

    Perfect time for everyone.

    And two chickens in every pot! :-()

    1. Re:Just make sunrise 6am by jriskin · · Score: 1

      I was thinking something similar. A continuously variable time scheme that adjusts for sunrise at your gps location.

      Clocks would all have to communicate to a central time server and adjust accordingly. It would be complex to coordinate but you would just look at your clock normally. Alarm goes off at the normal time daily.

      Basically instead of setting your clocks forward or backward twice a year, have them automatically adjust a few seconds a day. Instead of timezones it would gradually adjust across the globe. Meetings would have to take this in to account. Call me at 3pm+125 (some sort of minutes offset or something). Smart calendar software could automatically calculate this for you.

      Broadcast TV would have to factor this in as well, but with Tivo/PVR's making headway in to displacing real time TV this becomes less of a concern. Still live radio/tv broadcasts would be a little challenging, but not impossible to coordinate.

  55. Lived in Korea for a year and a half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and never missed DST. They seem to get business done very well without it.

  56. fixith the axith by darinh · · Score: 2, Funny

    we need to remedy that tilty-axis-syndrome that the earth has and straighten that crap up.

  57. Giant orbiting mirrors. by IWood · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alternately, a mission to Jupiter that will trigger the monolith's sun conversion program.

  58. Adapt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ditch DST already

    Adaptability is an amazing human trait. we will get use to the extra hour (OHH NOOO 60 munites) of adjusted light/dark.

    Plenty of other developed countries have ditched DST with not too many humans dying off, i think we can manage it.

  59. SSIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new name is SSIS. SQL Server Integration Services.

  60. Japan's "System" by FFCecil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Simple answer: abolish it. I lived in Japan for several years and they don't adjust their clocks. Guess what? I didn't notice! Well, except that I didn't have the hassle of changing all my clocks, and throwing off my sleeping rhythm twice a year.

    Frankly, I don't see the point of DST anymore. So many people work in giant window-less buildings now, what does it matter? The lights are on the same amount of time regardless. And if you desperately need consistent daylight, move closer to the equator. Or you could invest in some full-spectrum light bulbs (they help me quite a bit).

    Meh, just my $0.02.

    1. Re:Japan's "System" by forceman130 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Simple answer: abolish it. I lived in Japan for several years and they don't adjust their clocks. Guess what? I didn't notice! Well, except that I didn't have the hassle of changing all my clocks, and throwing off my sleeping rhythm twice a year.

      I also lived in Japan, and on the contrary, I think Japan needs more hours of DST. Why on earth should it get light at 4 AM and get dark at 6 PM?

      --
      Wow, a 7 digit ID - let that be a lesson in the perils of procrastination.
    2. Re:Japan's "System" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why on earth should it get light at 5 AM and get dark at 7 PM?

  61. Not Necessarily by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Funny

    That depends on the lights. If I stand under my roomful of 1000 watt grow lights that I use to grow my...um tomatoes...that light is actually quite good for you.

    1. Re:Not Necessarily by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      That was humor, btw. I don't really grow indoor tomatoes, or anything for that matter. That's what cornfields are for.

    2. Re:Not Necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

  62. What to replace daylight savings time with by RonMcMahon · · Score: 1

    I say get rid of it entirely. I grew up in Saskatchewan and we don't subscribe to DST.

    While most of North America is wringing hands and wasting time (oh the irony!) changing clocks and figuring out if it is ahead or back and fighting with children who now don't want to go to bed when it is light outside, the people of Saskatchewan simply go on; happily oblivious to the storm that engulfs its neighbours twice a year.

    Of course the one funky thing that we DO have to deal with is tv broadcasts from out of province shifting time slots...but soon we'll all have the technology that will make that a problem of the past.

    1. Re:What to replace daylight savings time with by Mobkey · · Score: 1

      That is definitely the worst thing... TV shows shifting by an hour twice a year, and not remembering if we're on the same time as Manitoba or Alberta. And how far away EST is at any given time.

  63. 30 minutes. by deezilmsu · · Score: 1

    Move everyone up 30 minutes permanently. In the winter, things get dark a little early. In the summer, it stays dark a little more into the morning.

    --
    It's not that I'm asking the big questions, it's that I'm asking lots of small ones.
    1. Re:30 minutes. by JoshDM · · Score: 1

      Had I not hit the preview button to review my post, I might have beat you to it. :)

      By one minute. :/

  64. Lets just do the one where we get an extra hour by Roy+Hobbs · · Score: 1

    I like having that extra hour in the morning. We could have a DST jump every other weak. Then skip, I dunno, Dec. 25th to account for the day we lost.

  65. Benefits and drawbacks by ITJC68 · · Score: 0

    The benefits are now the daylight is earlier in the morning (can be good or bad for some), should allow for less use of lighting since you can turn off earlier in the morning. Drawbacks, The time change messes with alot of people like myself. It takes a week to get used to the time change. Fall is ok but spring blows chunks with loosing an hour. For programs this is a pain in the ass as well. I wish they would just get rid of it and move the time a half hour back and leave it the hell alone. Split the difference so no changes should be needed.

  66. The ultimate solution to DST by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    Most places in the US either have to move forward or back an hour, and some places don't, right?

    1 - Set a date for the LAST DST.

    2 - On that date, instead of an HOUR, move a HALF AN HOUR in whatever direction your location traditionally goes at this time.

    3 - Any location that doesn't traditionally move may either stay put or make a final decision to move with their neighbors.

    4 - Lock in the time. Done. Time is now set.

    5 - ...

    6 - Profit.

  67. Move to Indiana by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Problem solved, next.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Move to Indiana by Zhila+the+Great+Z · · Score: 1

      Uhm..... I don't think that will work anymore....

  68. 1/2 Hour...Done! by Waste55 · · Score: 1

    Lets just do only 1/2 hour this time and call it quits... ;)

  69. Re:How about this? SAD by seifried · · Score: 1

    So buy full-spectrum light bulbs. I did for my entire house, at first many people complain that the light is "cold" (it's much whiter than the sickly-yellow pall a standard incandescent light casts) but after a while you get used to it and realize how bad incandescent bulbs make everything look.

  70. What is this 'sun' thing you speak of? by boyfaceddog · · Score: 1

    I live in Minnesota in the Northern latitudes (shut it, Canadians). I get up at five am and leave for work at 6:30 am. I work in a cube in a room without windows until 5 pm when I go home. It is ALWAYS dark.

    From October until April, DST or not, it makes no difference to me.

    --
    Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
  71. Backwards... by mengel · · Score: 1
    That's backwards.

    The time we move to in the winter *is* the right time.

    We should just stay there all year. I used to live in Indiana, most of which, up until a few years ago, did exactly that. It works fine.

    They only changed it so as not to be always confusing people from other places.

    --
    - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    1. Re:Backwards... by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have the Spanish solution: Ignore the solar noon altogether. Spain is in the same time zone as most of eastern Europe, so it's never dawn at 6, but there's light much later in the day.

      As it is now in the US, many hours of sunlight are wasted unless you wake up at 6, and do something for two hours before getting to work. Instead, it's dark very early, so anything you'll do after coming from work in the winter will be done in darkness.

      If noon is at the middle of the day, office hours should start at 6 or 7.

  72. Screams of Frustration by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    DST causes screams of frustration twice a year as VCR clocks need to be reset.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Screams of Frustration by paulbiz · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure the curators of the history museums (the only places that still have VCRs) are annoyed by this task.

    2. Re:Screams of Frustration by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      Who ever sets their VCR clock?

  73. UTC by taniwha · · Score: 1
    one time to rule them all - just change your work hours/days to match the local sun

    Remember that timezones are a relatively modern invention - used to be every little town had it's own time - from the town hall clock - it wasn't until the coming of the railroad (and timetables) and the telegraph that anyone needed to care

  74. Ceti Alpha Five? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    KHAN: Admiral? Admiral?! Admiral Kirk! He never told you how Admiral Kirk sent seventy of us into exile on this barren sand heap with only the contents of these cargo bays to sustain us!?

    CHEKOV: You lie! On Ceti Alpha Five there was life, a fair chance!

    KHAN: *THIS* is Ceti Alpha Five! Ceti Alpha Six exploded six months after we were left here! The shock shifted the orbit of this planet and everything was laid waste. Admiral Kirk never bothered to check on our progress. It was only the fact of my genetically engineered intellect that enabled us to survive!

  75. Time is a man-made concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time is just a way for us to keep track of things. Is there anything keeping us from all just using one time, except for the societal conditioning that it shouldn't be sunny at 2 am?

    Just because you change the time, or even remove clocks from your house altogether, doesn't really change anything.

    Does it make any difference if you work during the day for 8 hours and the "work day" in your part of the world is 2 am to 10 am universal time instead of 9 am to 5 pm?

  76. My Favorite DST Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When told the reason for Daylight Saving time the old Indian said... 'Only a white man would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket and sew it to the bottom of a blanket and have a longer blanket.'

    1. Re:My Favorite DST Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a white man and I'm offended by your tone. Only an Indian would believe that having three feet is a bad thing.

      What does the blanket have to do with anything?

  77. Re:Move to Arizona-TOO CONSERVATIVE by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    We don't do DST in John McCain country.

    That's because we're way too conservative to implement any Progressive[tm] ideas like resetting a perfectly good clock or VCR twice a year. Besides, AZ has all the sunlight it needs already.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  78. Swatch oddly turns 10 years old today. by KurtisKiesel · · Score: 1

    Oddly that is only 3,650,915 beats so far.

    1. Re:Swatch oddly turns 10 years old today. by empaler · · Score: 1

      I wonder whatever happened to that behemoth of a Sw@tch wristwatch I had.

  79. DST != Good_for_humans by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    While I like having the extra daylight into the evening hours during the spring and summer, the rest of the year gets pretty screwed up for me because of it. Our sleep patterns are tied to periods of light and dark, and while I'm not going to speak for everyone else, the time change screws with my sleep patterns as well as my overall mood. If it were up to me, I'd abolish the practice completely. I understand the original reasons for it, but farmers use machines with lots of lights on them now and not mule-driven ploughs, so they really couldn't care less I think whether or not it's light or dark outside when they're working.

  80. Currently living in Arizona by logicassasin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Moved here from Michigan 5 years ago. I don't miss DST at all. I just know that when I wake up at 5am, during the spring/summer, it's nearly broad daylight and in the colder months it's pitch black out. Right now, it's pitch black at 5am, at 5:30, I see some sunlight, by the time I get in my car at 6-615:am, it's daylight.

    Right now, I see the idiodicy of DST. You don't actually get more daylight, we just fool you into thinking you do.

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
    1. Re:Currently living in Arizona by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      ...and everyone south of Chicago has to suffer for the northern state's problems. I live in Texas and don't see the difference when we switch between the two.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:Currently living in Arizona by Endo13 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Right now, I see the idiodicy of DST. You don't actually get more daylight, we just fool you into thinking you do.

      Too bad most people aren't that smart.

      All DST does is change what time your clock shows. It doesn't change what time it really is, and it doesn't change what time your body thinks it is. And it for damned sure doesn't give anyone more fucking daylight.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    3. Re:Currently living in Arizona by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      To be fair, during DST many people get more daylight where they are not trapped in a windowless office in a concrete and steel building.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    4. Re:Currently living in Arizona by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      "To be fair, during summer many people get more daylight where they are not trapped in a windowless office in a concrete and steel building."

      Fixed that for you. Days are longer in summer and shorter in winter. Deal with it.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    5. Re:Currently living in Arizona by TuaAmin13 · · Score: 1

      I believe that's the point, to not be able to tell. The hours are bumped so you wake up when it's light, work during the light hours, and go to sleep when it's dark. If we didn't change the clocks then supposedly you'll use more energy by turning on lights when it's dark out, because it's 7am and you have to get ready for work. You also don't have to spend any additional effort darkening your room to go to sleep at night.

      While I think it's silly (we have enough technology to synchronize time; no more sun dials, and everyone flips the light on in the morning anyhow, so there's really no power savings), I don't see this going away anytime soon.

    6. Re:Currently living in Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moved here from Michigan 5 years ago. I don't miss DST at all. I just know that when I wake up at 5am, during the spring/summer, it's nearly broad daylight and in the colder months it's pitch black out.

      So, just like Michigan except that in the summer you sleep through part of the day - and lose daylight in the evening when you get home?

      I too moved from Michigan 5 years ago... to Hokkaido. My summers changed from "its 9pm and still not dark enough for fireworks" to "its three thirty *AM*, glad its bright enough outside so I can start gathering kelp!" Kinda like midnight sun except its dark from 7pm to 2am. Wonderful.

    7. Re:Currently living in Arizona by mpe · · Score: 1

      Fixed that for you. Days are longer in summer and shorter in winter. Deal with it.

      This is only the case if your lattitude is greater than 23 26 22. Thus if you can't "Deal with it" the answer is to move nearer to the Equator. Of course no amount of messing around with clocks is going to help at a lattitude of 66 33 39 or greater.

    8. Re:Currently living in Arizona by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Except for employers that actually understand that flexible working is actually more effective and efficient. And then I can have as many hours of daylight in the evening as I choose, I just have to get in earlier.

    9. Re:Currently living in Arizona by locofungus · · Score: 1

      All DST does is change what time your clock shows. It doesn't change what time it really is, and it doesn't change what time your body thinks it is. And it for damned sure doesn't give anyone more fucking daylight.

      No, this is wrong. The total hours of daylight don't change but the usable hours do.

      I get up for work around 6am usually. For most of the year it is dark. For much of the rest the sun is just up. For just a couple of months in the year the sun is up early enough that I could use the daylight in the morning and then be back in the house at 6am to get ready for work.

      At the end of the day it's similar - except that this time I can use the daylight in the evening until it's too dark. Only then do I have to go in and get cleaned up etc.

      If all you want to do outside is sit and read a book then it probably doesn't make much difference (although it's usually much warmer in the evening when the sun is setting than it is in the morning when the sun is rising.)

      But I want to be out cycling, working in the garden etc.

      So I want it dark in the morning when I get up and go to work because that is dead time. And I want it light in the evenings because I can utilize all the hours of light.

      The longest day:

      London:..21 Jun 2008.Sunrise=04:43.sunset=21:22
      Glasgow:.21 Jun 2008.........04:31........22:06

      Abolish BST and it would be getting light at quarter to four in the morning and dark by half eight in the evening, 9pm in Scotland. Shift the clocks by another hour and most people will lose nothing in the morning and most people will gain an extra hour of daylight in the evening. Sunrise will then be comparable with Rome (which I think is on a par with NY) and we'd get extra time in the evening - because we're much further North - which would be good because in Rome the dark is nice because of the heat in summer while in the UK the sun is nice because it's not all that hot even in the height of summer)

      The shortest day:

      London:..21 Dec 2008.Sunrise=08:04.sunset=15:54
      Glasgow:.21 Dec 2008.........08:46........15:45

      Nobody can use the daylight hours. At best, people will be travelling to and from work/school in daylight. Move the clocks by an hour and few people will lose anything in the morning and schoolkids at least will gain an hour of daylight in the evening.

      So I'd change UK time to match Central Europe and keep the hour shift.

      Schools could, of course, open and close an hour earlier instead; but there'd be an outcry from parents because it wouldn't fit as well with the working day. The vast majority of people cannot just move their working day around at the whims of sunrise/sunset - the only way to achieve the effect is to physically change the clocks.

      It always amuses me that the people who are anti changing the clocks say that the people who like it can just "get up earlier". The people who don't like it could just "get up later". I even have some clocks that I don't bother to change between BST and GMT the conversion is effortless - I don't even notice I'm doing it. But then I'll say things to my collegues in London like "See you at the 10am meeting" and we'll meet at 3pm as expected. (My partner once made the mistake of going to her 10am meeting at 3pm - and didn't recognise any of the people in the meeting room. "Isn't this the 10am meeting?". "In New York we have 10am meetings in the morning, not the afternoon!"). For some reason it does take me a week to get used to the change in time-zone difference between UK and Tokyo when the clocks change. But I have a clock showing Tokyo time and I use that.

      My computers all run UTC - obviously. But they couldn't give a toss about being out to play in daylight. My TZ setting just converts the display to whatever is convenient - by default that's London time but, when necessary, I just change it to TK or NY timezone.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    10. Re:Currently living in Arizona by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      No, this is wrong. The total hours of daylight don't change but the usable hours do.

      I get up for work around 6am usually. For most of the year it is dark. For much of the rest the sun is just up. For just a couple of months in the year the sun is up early enough that I could use the daylight in the morning and then be back in the house at 6am to get ready for work.

      At the end of the day it's similar - except that this time I can use the daylight in the evening until it's too dark. Only then do I have to go in and get cleaned up etc.

      No one is stopping you from getting up earlier and going to bed earlier, regardless of DST. You can go to bed as soon as you get off work if you want, and then get up as soon as you've had enough sleep. DST giving anyone more 'usable' daylight is a myth.

      If all you want to do outside is sit and read a book then it probably doesn't make much difference (although it's usually much warmer in the evening when the sun is setting than it is in the morning when the sun is rising.)

      But I want to be out cycling, working in the garden etc.

      So I want it dark in the morning when I get up and go to work because that is dead time. And I want it light in the evenings because I can utilize all the hours of light.

      Yeah, see I can do that too.

      If all you want to do after work is piddle around by yourself doing things like cycling, working in the garden, etc. then sure you'll like the extra daylight in the evening.

      But I want to be out late in the evening hanging out with friends, having a good time, etc.

      So I want to sleep in late in the mornings and have it already be daylight when I get up and go to work, because all the best social activities happen after it's already dark out in the evening. And getting up an hour earlier just sucks any way you look at it, if you don't happen to be a morning person.

      See, what you bring up is only personal preference. It's nothing more than a "what I want" vs. "what you want". And guess what, what I want is to not have to get up an extra hour early so all 200 of you in the world who want extra time to cycle or garden an extra hour can do it after work instead of before. And what I want means no one has to fuck around with clocks twice a year or deal with stupid mandatory jet lag twice a year.

      So get over yourself. If you want to cycle or garden, get your ass out of bed an hour early and do it before you go to work, and don't pretend like you're doing anyone else any favors by making everyone get up an hour early for no reason.

      DST needs to die. It out-lived its usefulness about 90 years ago.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    11. Re:Currently living in Arizona by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      It always amuses me that the people who are anti changing the clocks say that the people who like it can just "get up earlier". The people who don't like it could just "get up later".

      Now you're just being stupid. If we only worked a few hours in the middle of the day, you'd be absolutely right. For most people though the work day starts as soon as they get up. So sure, show me this place where I can go work and they don't care if I just decide to come in to work an hour later every morning during DST. People like you don't amuse me. But you do amaze me at how stupid and selfish you are about this issue. Somehow you think it makes sense to make everyone change clocks twice a year and get up an hour earlier during the summer, just so you can do your little personal hobbies after work instead of before.

      And don't kid yourself, that's the only thing DST does now. And even for outdoor activities, the ones that actually need daylight are now so few and far between, keeping DST around is irresponsible and stupid.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    12. Re:Currently living in Arizona by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      I lived in Arizona for a while. Arizona happens to be one of those states that is in a good place on the globe where not having DST does not affect it much. My only problem with living in Arizona was that twice a year, I would have to readjust for when my shows came on Cable.

      I live in Texas now, and cannot freakin wait to fall back in a week. The concept of the sun not coming up until about 7:15 now is completely insane, and it just absolutely drains me. And here we are at the end of november, and it not getting dark until about 7. That is just insane - having to commute to work in the morning in the pitch black, and then have the sun glaring in my face for the drive home.

      If we didn't spring forward in summer here in Texas, you start having issues with the sun coming up at about 4:30. Then I feel like I am wasting my day away.

      No, DST makes a lot of sense, just stop jacking with when its going to start every year. Every single spring and fall, we still manage to find people who yell and scream at us that their calendar is broke, and we have to go install patches on their system. I thought it fell on the same weekend the past two years, but apparently every six months, there is another Outlook patch out there for this.

    13. Re:Currently living in Arizona by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1

      You mean, until now, you actually thought you were getting more daylight?

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    14. Re:Currently living in Arizona by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      If we didn't change the clocks then supposedly you'll use more energy by turning on lights when it's dark out, because it's 7am and you have to get ready for work. You also don't have to spend any additional effort darkening your room to go to sleep at night.

      You kinda got that backwards. DST gets you up an hour earlier in the morning during the summer, so you'd actually be more likely to have to turn on the lights in the morning. The original concept behind DST was so people don't waste as many candles after work. Now though, most people use the lights in the house whether it's dark outside or not, and using the lights an extra hour more or less every day doesn't add up to nearly as much as the cost of using extra candles back in the day. Also, as a study showed a while back, the lower cost in lighting is now being outweighed by higher costs in cooling, because most people who come home from work in the summer don't want to mess around outside, and so instead of getting home when the house is already cooler (because it's later in the day) they come home when it's still hot and crank up the AC.

      So literally the only people who still benefit from DST are the ones who have some outdoor hobby they want to do after work (not before) that has to be done in areas that aren't lit up by plenty of lighting. And there's not very many of those hobbies and areas left. Even most golf courses nowadays are lit up enough to finish your game after dark. Really, the only hobbies that are left that still benefit from DST can be just as easily done before work as after. So we all pay the price in energy bills, mandatory jet lag, and the inconvenience of changing clocks. Just so a very small percentage of people can do their little hobbies after work instead of before. Yup, sounds like a great trade.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    15. Re:Currently living in Arizona by krenshala · · Score: 1

      This is why my proposed solution is to use the correct time for your timezone, and shift the working day back an hour for everyone, all year long. Instead of 9 to 5, you work 8 to 4, and have your extra hour of daylight without having to mess with clocks and whatnot.

      Sure, everyone would have to get used to the new schedule, but that happens twice a year now as the times change.

      --

      krenshala

    16. Re:Currently living in Arizona by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Wait, I'm missing something. They have colder months in Arizona?

      Because, I was kind of under the impression it was always summer down there.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    17. Re:Currently living in Arizona by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Fixed that for you.

      Stopped reading your reply after that.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  81. Think big by J.R.+Random · · Score: 1

    This whole problem is caused by summer days being longer than winter days. Build some BIG rockets, chain them to the earth, and fix that tilt of the axis so we just have spring all year round with 12 hours of daylight every day.

  82. Yeah! by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 5, Funny

    That sounds like a great idea. Let's get together and start planning the transition, tomorrow at noon.

    1. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..er, that would be YOUR 0.5 arc second local time, or MINE? :)

      I grew up quite fine without DST, and have to now deal with it where I live. We have this ritual that starts after dinner Saturday: wall clocks, all kitchen devices, media crates (pvr, vcr, etc), then smaller things like alaram clocks, several digital cameras, camcorder, and then wristwatches. Usually then its time for bed and waking up to the next time configuration.

      Been wondering just WHO are we saving the daylight for? The idea is obsolete.

    2. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up without DST too, down in the tropics, where the difference between daylight hours in summer and winter was about half an hour. When I moved to a temperate area with DST, it was startling, I tell you.

      The oddest experience was the week after the first time when I set my clocks back during the fall. I didn't arrive late or early to any of my committments for that week. However, that first Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, I noticed that something was very, very different than the week before.

      So I asked my housemate about it: "Hey, have you noticed that this week, the sun's going down a lot earlier? Like, by an hour?"

      And then I was enlightened. Actually, not, just a bit less confused. Still, this wasn't as bad as breaking the habit that dinnertime was just after sunset. That summer sucked: "Gee, why do I feel so hungry? The sun's still up!"

  83. set your real time clock to UTC & forget about by anwyn · · Score: 1

    Do not mess with your computer's clocks twice a year. Set your computer's real time clock to UTC (world time), and forget about it. Your computer keeps time in UTC anyway. It only converts to local time when a program requests local time. If you set the real time clock to UTC, you can move your computer between timezones and never have to set a clock. Just tell the computer what zone you are in, so it can convert to local time correctly, but you have to do that anyway.

    It may be somewhat more difficult to determine UTC to set your real time clock, but you only have to do it once!

    Only inferior proprietary Operating Systems mess with the clock twice a year.

  84. DST by sxmjmae · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have always found it a funny topic. The politician like to think they have so much power by implement DST or not. Has anyone ever told them they can control the real number of hours of sunlight through legislation? I remember one local politician saying DST would give farms an extra hour of day light! Wow I thought - how could they have such power over the cosmos.

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
    1. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daylight saving should be abolished. Don't we have enough trouble with global warming, fading curtains, and cows waking up too early..?

  85. All DST all the Time by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd love to get up at 5am every day, and work from 6am to 2 or 3pm.

    That way I could have a ton of daylight when I come home, which is when I need it.
    Do you think you could talk to my boss for me?

    Most people work in cubes or offices, or at least inside. What use is daylight to most of us of before say.. lunchtime??

    I say we spring forward 3 hours and just stay there all the time.

    WTF do I need daylight for on my way to work, just so I can wander around my yard with a flashlight at 6pm? We're not farmers anymore.

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
    1. Re:All DST all the Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: move to the West Coast and take a job revolving around the NY equity markets. NASDAQ/NYSE/etc open at 9:30 Eastern and close at 4. That's 6:30-1 Pacific.

    2. Re:All DST all the Time by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If you're an early-morning person, and you want to get out and see some sunlight in the afternoon, you might want to consider working in a field that keeps those hours. I don't know if you want to switch or not, but for those who are still young enough to choose, consider working in a surgical field. The day starts around 7, and so most people work 6:30(ish) to 3, with a few starting earlier.

    3. Re:All DST all the Time by caluml · · Score: 1

      I'd love to get up at 5am every day, and work from 6am to 2 or 3pm.

      And I'm the opposite. 11am until 7 would be perfect. Of course, if you could get the drunken students that wait for taxis outside my windows from making hellish noise until 11.30, 11.45 pm from making any noise, I might be able to get to sleep before midnight, and hence be able to be up before 8.

    4. Re:All DST all the Time by Rennt · · Score: 1

      In many trades, 7-3 is the standard working hours year round.

      I loved it during my stint as a builders laborer. The best bit is most pubs have skimpy barmaids between 3-5 for the tradies, while professional 9-5 white collars workers missed out!.

  86. kaboom! by flahwho · · Score: 1

    Worldwide eradication of all humans should take care of this daylight savings time mess!

  87. Nooo-- Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A year ago last spring I was working as a Unix Admin for a rather large dysfunctional company. They waited until January and then decided that a several thousand systems needed DST patching. I was part of a team that worked seven days a week on this. I think I got a $200 gift card for all my overtime. PLEASE don't mess with DST again.

  88. Dump it for good by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    This isn't an easy shift for me to make. I've lived with DST all my life, and am very much a traditionalist about stuff like this.

    However, after dealing with the DST change a few years ago, I really started to think about it, and realised that I have no love for DST at all. Let's just dump it, and be done with it. Allowing kids the extra hour to stay out until midnight instead of 11pm isn't worth much. Economically, the only effect is that people might shop less in the evenings (the real reason for pushing DST out for another six weeks or whatever).

    DST wasn't a great idea to start with, and it's too difficult to bother with in a connected world. Good riddance.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  89. 70Hz from 9-5 50Hz 5-1 60Hz rest of night by An+dochasac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of my schoolteachers suggested this back when most clocks ran on 60Hz synchronous motors. Speed up time during the work day, slow it down at happy hour.

  90. Why DST? Simple Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why DST? During the summer, the sun rises early in the morning when most people are still asleep. Moving the clock ahead an hour lets us use that morning hour in the evening. We don't need to turn on the lights on for an hour.

  91. Ethiopian time by paulbiz · · Score: 1

    We should use Ethiopian time. Hours from 1 to 12 span from sunrise to sunset, and 1 to 12 from sunset to sunrise.

    Of course, they also use the Julian calendar and have thirteen months on leap year... so maybe they aren't the shining example.

  92. STOP DST by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    I remember when I lived in Iowa as a graduate student in the '60s and the state was about to start DST for the first time. The Des Moines Register published letters from folks who complained about the switch. Many folks commented that the "extra hour of daylight" would reek all kinds of havoc: it would be bad for lawns, the corn and soy bean crops because it would damage them by burning them. If this is true, we ought to get rid of that extra hour of sunlight in the summer. STOP DST!

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  93. Let's drop Standard Time altogether by Ped+Xing · · Score: 1

    If you live in North America, you have already seen Daylight Savings Time creep over more and more of the calendar. It is now the time used for 8 months of the year. So why every go back to Standard Time?

    If we drop standard time, we can get rid of the ridiculous rule that says that one day a year there will be no time between 2:00 AM and 3:00 AM. Something happened on the Second Sunday in March at 2:41 AM? Never happened.

    We could also get rid of the even worse rule that on one day a year all times between 1:00 AM and 2:00 AM will occur twice! Something happened at 1:24 AM on the first Sunday in November? Which 1:24 AM? The first one or the second one?

    Eventually perhaps we could go to UTC and just have a different set of local business hours in each municipality. But somehow, "Noon" and "Midnight" seem to be too ingrained to get there just yet.

  94. Just say "No": no DST, no Central, no Mountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the US I suggest we do away with DST and merge our 4 timezones into 2. Since the Mountain and Central time zones are always forgotten they should be merged: Central into Eastern and Mountain into Pacific. Then since we don't want a 3 hour break at a border each timezone moves 1/2 hour closer to the other since a 2 hour break is OK. This would put the ET (notice not Standard or Daylight designation) as GMT-4:30 and PT as GMT-6:30.

  95. Nothing! by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

    The earth's rotational speed is decreasing! We are all doomed! Why even think about DST at such grave moments!?!?

    --
    "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
  96. DST: instead of -1, +1 do -1, -23 by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Everyone can deal with the hour back (-1) in the fall stuff. The hour ahead (+1) in the spring is a bitch.

    So, why not simply do -23 hours in the spring, instead of +1? Everyone get almost a day to piss away again, and the clocks still have the same time in the end.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  97. How to get off DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    My wife hates DST. She looked into how a state could "get off" of the train, so to speak.

    And, DST is simply a federal standard that sets the days, and it's up to the states to either do it on the federally-mandated days, or not.

    It's voluntary.

    So, if any state votes to not change the clocks in March (now?), that's it, they don't change.

  98. Re:Don't like DST? Do what I did... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    ...move to Arizona. Problem solved.

    -B

    Except that East Indiana used to be DST-free, too, but they finally caved in and adopted it... I wouldn't want to move somewhere just because they're rational about one particular thing, only to have them maybe change it in the future...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  99. Forget about hours and minutes by yooman · · Score: 1

    Make points all over and anywhere the globe where you can make as relative starting point. You choose your designated time house. When sun peaks above the horizon at said location, it is sun rise starting point at that location. Develop a photonic time piece and mass produce. As sun rise starts in that location, all who decide to use that location's base time have their photonic time pieces automatically start tick tocking light bounces when sun has peaked. Every Sun rise at said location, the time piece begins again at tick tocking. Ticks are counted so you can say meet me at 400 Giga ticks in third day of Winter. Or how ever many ticks a light clock would make to be your decided amount of time after sun rise.)(TASR)

    Or you could use the sun's highest point at your designated time house starting point. Ticks after noon (TAN)

    Or Ticks After Sunset (TASS)

    Or ticks after your favorite earth shattering event. Ex: Ticks after First Man on Mars(TAFMoM)

    1. Re:Forget about hours and minutes by yooman · · Score: 1

      and if backwards time compatibility is an issue, make time pieces with instant translation capability. hah.

  100. Four words by diablovision · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Four words:

    One time for Earth.

    --
    120 characters isn't enough to explain it.
    1. Re:Four words by viridari · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly.

      UTC is a good starting point. Eliminate time zones, eliminate DST. There is no reason that 0700 needs to be a morning hour. It's just 0700. Might be morning in London, middle of the night in New York. Who cares. No more fscking around with clocks twice a year. No more setting time zones on your GPS, your watch, your cell phone, your PC, etc.

  101. Just Move 30 Minutes and Be Done! by BigAssRat · · Score: 1

    If we just move the time 30 minutes forward this year and be done with it then we will have a compromise between the two positions...

    1. Re:Just Move 30 Minutes and Be Done! by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      DST lasts 2/3 of the year now.
      We would need to set the clock 40 minutes forward for the compromise.

  102. Kidnappings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didnt they try and get rid of DST many years back, only to find that children standing outside waiting for the bus were more likely to get kidnapped when it was dark out?

    Maybe thats just an urban myth to keep us on DST, but it was something I had heard about before and didnt see any discussion on it yet.

  103. Simple Solution by dave562 · · Score: 1

    If you have a job that requires you to wake up when the sun comes up then wake up when the sun comes up. If you can only work when you have available light then stop working when the sun starts to set. We live in a 24/7 world these days. We can do what we want to do when we want to do it. The whole idea of setting the clock back and forth has outlived its usefulness.

  104. India has it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India has it right - just set the clocks 1/2 ahead of standard time and then forget Daylight savings time. Problem solved.

  105. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, you see that the Time Cube isn't so crazy after all.

    1. Re:Finally by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      But you haven't considered the effect of DST on Time Cube!

  106. An incredible waste of time by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

    I live in Florida so I still have a very difficult time even understanding what DST was supposed to accomplish. Sundown at 6:00 instead of 7:00? or vice versa? what a stupid waste.

    Just settle on when you want the hour to be and leaqve it there. You'll save tons of time, money and consternation... And, most importantly, reduce the number of things we bitch about by two.

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  107. Convert to TAI or TI instead of UTC by Platinumrat · · Score: 1

    UTC is going to be phased out anyway. So why not use it's replacement TI. Does away with those pesky leap seconds as well. I mean who wants to know that 12:00 roughly corresponds to the sun being at its highest point in the sky anyway. I realise it's bucking conventional "/." wisdom, but most of the world doesn't revolve around the internet. People still need to make or sell actual stuff that other people buy. Children need to go to schools. The corner shop is still cateres to local needs and will open during peak business hours. People still think locally; we're hardwired that way. We used to ignore 9-5 before. That's was during the industrial revolution. Then they had workhouses and a small elite class oppressing the poor and uneducated. (Ohh! I think we've gone full circle on that one.) That's why unions were form to protect the rights of workers from exploitation, hence the 8 hour day.

  108. Just ignore it by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    Why is the government in charge of what time it is? Is there a law on the books? If the majority of people ignore DST - or even better, adopt UTC as their clock - it'd wind up becoming official eventually.

    If we can get people to type with their thumbs, we can get them to adopt UTC.

    But then again, when will we know when to check the batteries of our smoke detectors?

  109. Daylight Saving Time NOT Shortly Upon Us by sexconker · · Score: 1

    We will soon be switching back to standard time.

    1. Re:Daylight Saving Time NOT Shortly Upon Us by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      "Standard" time only lasts 4 months out of the year nowadys.
      Standard Time not so standard anymore.

  110. Software handling of DST by BlaisePascal · · Score: 1

    In the non-embedded world, people rely on the operating system to handle the time, DST and all.

    Linux and MacOS systems are configured to use a second count from an epoch internally, which it converts to local time using a timezone database. The timezone database is designed to be updated, and updates are routinely sent out whenever a timezone (or DST rule) changes worldwide. The timezone db for Linux changed within days of the law being changed. The DB is historical, so it'll properly report times in the past, even though the rules have changed since then.

    The main problem with Linux embedded applications is updating the DB when the rules change.

    Windows... I dunno how Windows handles it.

    1. Re:Software handling of DST by ianare · · Score: 1
      There was a patch for XP / Vista when the law changed, although it took them longer than Mandriva & CentOS to release it. If you have win2000 and earlier, you will need to edit this registry key like so:

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Time Zones\Eastern Standard Time]
      "MapID"="38,39"
      "Index"=dword:00000023
      "TZI"=hex:2c,01,00,00,00,00,00,00,c4,ff,ff,ff,00,00,0b,00,00,00,01,00,02,00,00,\
      00,00,00,00,00,00,00,03,00,00,00,02,00,02,00,00,00,00,00,00,00

    2. Re:Software handling of DST by mpe · · Score: 1

      There was a patch for XP / Vista when the law changed, although it took them longer than Mandriva & CentOS to release it. If you have win2000 and earlier, you will need to edit this registry key like so:

      There is still the difference that the Windows method is to mess around with the clock, which can cause some strange effects if it happens to be rebooted at the wrong time. Whereas the unix method is keep the clock in GMT/UTC. It would be nice if there was a way to get Windows to follow the unix method.

    3. Re:Software handling of DST by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Windows adjust the clock method is immensely frustrating, and a symptom of an OS that despite pretending for the last few years, still isn't actually a multi-user environment.

    4. Re:Software handling of DST by ianare · · Score: 1

      Bah, they should just rebuild the windows GUI on top of *nix using Wine for compatibility and call it a day. But that's a different discussion ...

  111. 9-5 caused by daylight savings time? by kadehje · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The idea of an 8-hour day (and the 40-hour week) has only been around since about the beginning of the 20th century. It's mainly originated from workers' demands in response to conditions in which many factory owners required people to work 12 or more hours a day. Later, it was reinforced by legislation requiring overtime for hours in excess of 40 in an attempt to reduce unemployment. Before industrialization, there was little concept of a "standard" workday. Farmers worked however many hours were necessary to maintain their crops and livestock, even if it meant working from sunrise to after sunset. Shopkeepers in town set their hours according to their needs.

    If DST weren't an issue, wouldn't it have been more natural to set an 8-hour workday to run from 8 AM to 4 PM rather than one hour later? In the northern tier of the contiguous U.S., it's common for the sun to set between 4 and 5 PM in the winter. And the sun is almost always up before 8, except for some places close to the Canadian border or near the western edge of a time zone. A workday ending at 5 instead of 4 would have made things somewhat more complicated in a society where electric lighting hadn't yet become ubiquitous. Does anyone know how the hours 9-5 got chosen rather than some other 8-hour span?

    1. Re:9-5 caused by daylight savings time? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      True that. To riff on something I've seen here, what businesses are actually open from 9 to 5? I've never seen one. Offices open at 8; small retail tends to open at 10 (and stay open until 6); big retail is more like 9 to 9; the healthcare day usually starts at 7.

    2. Re:9-5 caused by daylight savings time? by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Banks. Hence why it is known as Banker's Hours. Also, a lot of Government stuff.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:9-5 caused by daylight savings time? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Bankers used to be even worse than that. When I was a kid - I'm 33 now - I remember that banks usually were open from, say, 9 to noon, then closed until 1, then reopened until around 4 - but the afternoon transactions were counted as occurring on the next business day.

    4. Re:9-5 caused by daylight savings time? by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      The afternoon transactions are still generally counted as occuring the next business day. I would suggest looking at the ATM signs a bit more the next time you are there. This makes some sense as most inter-bank processing is done at midnight.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  112. Farm Time by westlake · · Score: 1
    AKA Farm Time. Tell all time using GMT+5. Let people adjust to the fact that time is just a number and it shouldn't change the way they live and work.

    .
    Farm Time was local solar time.

    You adjusted your watch about every 25 miles or so - once a day.

    The railroad and the telegraph demanded standard time: 25 miles a day becomes 25 miles an hour as early as 1840.

    There is - or soon will be - "instant messaging" on a continental scale.

    That changes the way you think about markets, shipping, the entire structure of trade, banking and industry.

  113. Use time-since-sunrise instead by Jimmy_B · · Score: 1

    The problem with daylight savings time is that it's arbitrary; astronomical noon isn't really at 12:00 noon anywhere, but if a group schedules their meetings for 9am every day year round, they want them to always be in daylight. What we should do is make the relationship between clock time and daylight explicit, by expressing times relative to sunrise: "S+1:23" would be "1 hour 23 minutes after local sunrise". Clocks would show both sunrise-time and GMT. To keep things simple, assume that the sun rises at the same time every day of a month, and at the same time everywhere in a state/time zone. That way, the same time would always mean the same thing everywhere. And rather than having one day with an extra hour and one day missing an hour every year, the last day of each month would be slightly longer or shorter, but not enough to mess up sleep schedules.

  114. Alternatives to Daylight Saving Time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daylight Murder Time
    Daylight Wasting Time
    Daylight Nightdark Time
    Daylight Sometimes Time

  115. Just run on UCT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can call anyone, anywhere - meetings are scheduled at 1500z, and everyone knows what that means, no matter where they are.

    People who want to shift their business or school schedules can, at the time when they feel it's appropriate - like maybe the first week of October, you shift the office hours from 1400z - 0300z to 1300z - 0200z.

  116. Just use Standard Time by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Daylight Saving Time really only works (if it works at all) for a narrow range of latitudes.

    Too far south and the sun sets at the same time all year anyway. Too far north and the sun sets ridiculously late in the summer, and sets very early in the winter. Few of our southern hemisphere friends live far enough south for this to be an issue. Anybody here from Ushuaia?

    Even here, in southern Canada (49 degrees north), the sun sets at 1600 in the winter. If we didn't mess with time zones the sun would set at 2000 in the summer, and it isn't really dark until nearly 2200. How much later do you want it to set?

    ...laura

    1. Re:Just use Standard Time by zakureth · · Score: 1

      >How much later do you want it to set?

      Wait... you can change when the sun sets?

      Then why the hell are we bothering to change our clocks?

      I'm confused.

      --
      Windows: The operating system built for the internet. Unix: The operating system the Internet was built for.
    2. Re:Just use Standard Time by maglor_83 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How much later do you want it to set?

      1 Hour. I thought that was obvious. :)

    3. Re:Just use Standard Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not from Ushuaia, but from Porto Alegre (30 degrees south). Our DST started last week. On normal time the sunlight ends at 18:40 now in spring and would end at 19:30 in summer. With DST now it ends 19:40 and will end at 20:40 in summer. Since most of people here leave work at 18:00 or 18:30, in summer people have one more sunlight free hour after work to do whatever they want, go to parks (and no, you can't go to parks at night here, crime is a rule, not the exception). During winter the sunlight ends at 17:40 and there is no DST in winter because the sunlight starts at 06:50.
      But I agree with the only using UTC, GMT, everywhere idea. Let's get rid of all these time zones.

  117. Wrong name! by VirginMary · · Score: 1

    I can't believe how many people here call it "Daylight Savings Time"? It's called "Daylight Saving Time"!
    From Wikipedia: In the normative form, daylight saving time uses the present participle...
    From the same article: It's like "labour saving device".

    --
    When 1person suffers from a delusion,it is called insanity.When many people suffer from a delusion,it is called religion
  118. In the city, work at home by wagr · · Score: 1

    In a sufficiently large city, can you tell the difference anymore?

    Being a largely word-at-my-pace programmer, I've always followed the sun (or lack thereof). The only reason to set my clock is because I meet with others and want to know when rush hour traffic would affect me. Since my primary clock is my cell phone, which adjusts automatically, I only have to worry about the clock above my bed and the one on the microwave -- the former I could solve with a clock that sets itself, and the latter I pretty much only use as a reference as I walk out the door. Friends have gotten used to my occasionally showing up exactly 1 hour late or early.

  119. Shorter changes over a period of time by hellohenric · · Score: 1

    Ok my first post, Hello everyone! I have a idea, if people insist to keep DST. We could have this, and it all would be over in less then a week.. Lets say that the time is 12:00
    Change the time like this:
    Day1 - set the time to 12:10
    Day2 - set the time to 12:20
    Day3 - set the time to 12:30
    day4 - set the time to 12:40
    Day4 - set the time to 12:50
    Day6 - set the time to 13:00
    and vola! but on second thought it would be better with 4 or 2 days.

    2Days DST
    Day1 12:30
    Day2 13:00

    4Days DST
    Day1 - set the time to 12:15
    Day2 - set the time to 12:30
    Day3 - set the time to 12:45
    Day4 - set the time to 13:00

    Shorter changes over a period of time, is way better, and you will not feel like the time is being stolen from you. On the other hand more simple with 1 day...
    Henric

  120. McCain wants the clock set to 1950 by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Of course, GWBush wants it set to 1750, when he can be a Unitary Executive...

    But it did always strike me as ironic that the Native Americans in Arizona are forced to set their clocks to times that aren't closely connected to the sun, while the city folks are allowed to have high noon at 12:00 where it belongs.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  121. Savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was one of the smart ones. I started saving daylight when I was young, and now I almost have enough to have perpetual sunshine until croak.

  122. Re:Don't like DST? Do what I did... by NoirGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...move to Arizona. Problem solved.

    I did, but problem not solved - now I can't remember everybody else's time.

  123. What's wrong with 8-4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then middday is, y'know, the middle of the day.

  124. Re:DST is ending - only in Northern hemisphere by hamboynz · · Score: 1

    Yeah we put our clocks forward a couple of weeks ago. For a week I'm tired in the mornings and feel a little out of whack, but then I adjust and forget about until it's time to change back. We use to start DSL later in the year, but a couple of years ago there is a big push to start it earlier and end it later. Apparently some people really dig it.

  125. DST: Govt tells you to get up early for work by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yeah. DST is the government telling you to get up early and go to work, but change your clock to pretend you didn't do that. It didn't make much sense back when most city folks worked in factories, but it makes much less sense now when people who do work in offices ought to be keeping flextime to reduce commuting congestion.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  126. Re:Don't like DST? Do what I did... by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

    A different problem arises:
    When I lived in Arizona, I was always confused about whether we were on California time or New Mexico time.

  127. Let's get rid of timezones, too by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Then we won't need to deal with DST at all. Computers can be programmed/engineered to track time by geographic position. And they can always use UTC for an absolute time.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  128. Forget it competely! by $criptah · · Score: 1

    The best thing that we can do is to forget the DST completely and continue to live the way we do. Just the sole fact that we leave it up to governments to determine what is DST should scare you. Don't believe me? Ask Sun how much effort it took to re-compile all the Java crap in order to respect the new DST rules.

    Here is the way I see it. If you live close to equator, then you probably do not care about DST. It is so darn hot in many countries that people are accustomed to get up early in the morning and work while the sun is not hot. In many countries people take a break during afternoon because it is so darn hot to be outside. Then they keep on working during late afternoon.

    If for some darn reason you chose to live in a place far away from the Equator, then you just deal with it. I mean you deal with cold weather and other stuff already, why not add short days and long nights to the list of things that are pronounced in high latitudes?

    As for the rest of the electronic world, switch every damn thing to UTC. If you need to display your computer clock in a local time, configure it to add the offset to UTC and you're done. That way software vendors have a clear standard and people don't have to spend time figuring out what is going on.

  129. Small talk by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    Twice a year, we can expand out small talk to the DST/ST debate. If you live in the US there isn't much point to DST. However, the further North you live the more convenient DST becomes. Here in WPG, in summer we get 16.5 hours of sunlight at our peak. It is more convenient to have the sun go down at 10pm instead of rise at 4am. Perhaps originally, it saved some energy as people used less incandescent lighting. With the information age (cable TV, internet, etc..), I image that less energy, as a percent of total consumption, is used for lighting. Any thoughts?

  130. Too much thought by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

    There is way too much thought being put into this. Clearly the solution is to correct the earth's axis angle. Who needs seasons anyway?

  131. Sunrise - Sunset Clock by johnrpenner · · Score: 4, Funny

    the original clock was when the sun actually rose and set on the horizon of the earth.

    but we wanted to know exactly how far through that period we were.

    so when clocks were invented - we very linearly divided the day up into 24 parts,
    and then (based on ancient sumerian base 60) -- divided the 24 hours into 60 smaller parts.

    we still linearly divide our day (despite the fact that every day changes sunrise / sunset times), and we still use ancient sumerian base 60 in our measurement of time (minutes) today -- omg, its amazing we don't still use Cubits & Fathoms to measure things...!

    so, we can carry on with using base 60 for minutes, and medieval linear ideas of time, or we can take advantage of our understandings of science to create something more rational. so here are two proposals to take time measurement out of the medieval dark ages:

    1) 0:00 HOURS = SUNRISE. everything has a chip in it nowadays - you can't find a watch that doesn't have a chip in it. and if you have a chip in it -- computation is easy. we no longer have to use the medieval linear way of dividing up the day -- finally, we are able to have clocks that dynamically adjust for sunrise and sunset -- like SOL. the length of a day continually gets longer & shorter -- so should our watches. since all our watches have a chip in them already -- the sunrise/sunset computation should not be an obstacle. we propose the elimination of the terms of 'noon' and 'midnight' -- and always start counting 0:00 hours at sunrise.

    2) DECIMAL TIME. we no longer want to use 24 hours (why 24!?!?) and 60 minutes (base 60!!) -- instead, we use decimal time -- 10 hours in a day, 100 minutes per hour. the resulting 'minute' will be 1.44 of our existing old-style minutes.

    so there you have it -- no half-way medieval measures -- sunrise = 0:00 hours, there are 10 hours in a day, and 100 minutes in an hour. businesses always start at 2pm (2 hours after sunrise) -- ALWAYS, and people go home when it gets dark ALWAYS -- the business day will grow and shrink with the seasons, and all will be much more sensible, and in acccord with the natural rhythms of nature, while being easier to measure, because its all measured in decimal.

    2cents from toronto
    j

    1. Re:Sunrise - Sunset Clock by rdebath · · Score: 1

      >> DECIMAL TIME

      Sorry but the length of the second is now fixed. The costs of changing it would be astronomical, every scientific reference work, every reference to speed, every calculation in physics and engineering. The repercussions would reverberate for centuries.

    2. Re:Sunrise - Sunset Clock by alcourt · · Score: 1

      Base 10 is quite possibly the worst thing to happen to our learning system. It is also the reason why I find the metric system so incredibly annoying as to be completely unusable for real life. There is absolutely nothing good about base 10 except that we happen to have five digits coming out of each of our two hands, making it easy to multiply by nine on our fingers.

      Base 60 is actually one of the friendlier bases I've seen. Evenly divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, giving it a huge range of even subdivisions. (12 is the other base that I find very easy to work with for natural usage).

      --
      "I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend unto the death your right to say it." -- Voltaire
    3. Re:Sunrise - Sunset Clock by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      you can't find a watch that doesn't have a chip in it.

      I refute you thus.

      --
      -
    4. Re:Sunrise - Sunset Clock by againjj · · Score: 1

      You were modded funny, but some have proposed decimal time quite seriously. Personally, I think it makes as much sense as the move of every other measurement to decimal.

    5. Re:Sunrise - Sunset Clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to explain why metric system is so incredibly annoying and how there is nothing good about base 10 except that we happen to have five digits coming out of each of our two hands?

    6. Re:Sunrise - Sunset Clock by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      My meetings at work drag along enough as it is. I don't want a longer one-hour unit of time.

    7. Re:Sunrise - Sunset Clock by piroroadkill · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's already a system as you propose, it's called Swatch Internet Time

  132. Whining... by cuby · · Score: 1, Funny

    The traditional slashdot whining about this subject is upon us... Daylight savings is just fine. In some countries, including my own, this is not even a subject for an elevator chat.

    --
    Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
    1. Re:Whining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when a country (US) decides to change the occurrence by two weeks and causes Billions to be spent by many companies (software, hardware, publication of the change) to accommodate.

      Thankfully your elevator did not plummet to the ground based on some funky time adjustment code.

       

  133. Never understood how DST saved anything anyhow by thorayi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I never understood how DST saved anything anyhow. However, I do know that it causes a lot of intricate bugs, especially when programs contain time based loops. In most of the SDKs and Frameworks the default DateTime.Now returns the local time. A lot of software applications fail during DST switching because of loops in the code that compares two different times returns wild and unexpected results. I even had to mandate using DateTime.UtcNow in the code all the time.

    1. Re:Never understood how DST saved anything anyhow by level4 · · Score: 1

      I even had to mandate using DateTime.UtcNow in the code all the time.

      Which is, of course, what you should have been doing all along.

      --
      Let my new 7-digit UID be a lesson to all - write down your passwords.
  134. DST does the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What is the best way for humans to deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year and still foster coordination over disparate time zones?"

    Daylight savings doesn't help deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year. If anything it amplifies the effect. The days are longer in the summer. Then DST gives the perception that there is another hour of daylight on top of the already longer day. So if it would get dark at 9:00 pm under standard time it now gets dark at 10:00 pm with DST.

    If the goal was to make things more consistent. The shift would be done at the opposite time, so it occurred during the winter. Then when it is getting dark at 5:00 on standard time, the shifted time would cause it to be 6:00 when it got dark. This would be more consistent with the longer summer days.

    Second, it certainly doesn't facilitate coordination across different time zones. It hiders it if anything. This is coming from someone who drove to a wedding in Arizona and showed up an hour late.

    The idea for DST originated in the desire to sleep later in the summer without wasting the day, and being able to have more sunlight at night for recreation. DST is sham and should be done away with. It is way more trouble than it is worth.

  135. 24 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMHO all businesses should be open 24/7. It just seems wasteful to let the infrastructure go unused for many hours each day and on the weekends. Opening all businesses around the clock would remove the need for coordinated business hours, which would in turn make rush hours less of a problem. Oh, it would make DST obsolete, too.

  136. Please tell us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How you can manage to get the sun up for more than 8 hours a day in the scottish wintertime, then.

    Because DST doesn't save shit.

  137. The only reason DST exists by melted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is to get you to buy stuff. The initial intent was good - to save on candles and kerosene. These days DST simply doesn't make sense and the only reason it exists is because retail lobby wants it to exist. See, you're less likely to go out shopping when it's dark outside. So they make you adjust the clock, so you'd go shopping in the evening.

    1. Re:The only reason DST exists by the+plant+doctor · · Score: 1

      No it makes no sense for those of us that can't rearrange our workschedule to be able to take advantage of an extra hour of daylight after work to do yardwork. Heaven forbid we use the time to be outside when it's daylight!

      And no, I don't want to hear the common "Get up earlier". C'mon, that's a tired old complaint. I have to get the mower out, and other yard equipment, do the chores, then put it away. After that I'm free to get cleaned up and enjoy my evening. If I try to cram that into one extra hour in the morning before work, fuggetaboutit.

      Now if you want to discuss ways of making our workday start at 7 and not 8 on a nearly universal basis so we can conduct business in a normal fashion and get home at 4, then I'm all for it!

  138. Re:How about this? SAD by need4mospd · · Score: 1
    I'd be complaining about your "full spectrum" bulbs too. Nothing provides better color rendition than good ol' incandescent. I'm guessing you're just use to how "good", or blue, everything looks.

    A color temp of 3500K and a CRI of 100 is a perfect light bulb for home use. Those "full spectrum" bulbs are 6200K with a CRI of maybe 60. Incandescent bulbs are usually around 3200 with a CRI VERY close to 100.

  139. there's no silver bullet by kiddygrinder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only real solution is to network all clocks and have them auto adjust by say 10 min a few times during the year. Give it 5 or 10 years and it'll be fixed. Personally i don't have much of a problem with the way it is now, i just miss an hours sleep once a year to get an extra hour of daylight in the afternoon to sit on the veranda and drink beer, but to each their own i guess.

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  140. Re:Don't like DST? Do what I did... by Giolon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Better yet, Hawaii!

  141. All clocks are wrong. by k1e0x · · Score: 1

    All clocks are wrong anyhow. :p http://timecube.org/

    I think we should replace daylight saving with time cube.

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    1. Re:All clocks are wrong. by marxmarv · · Score: 1

      Dr. Bronner's Magic Clock?

      --
      /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
  142. Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Metric Time.

    Think about how round the numbers will be. Every 100 seconds we get a minute... Something like 20h days. Bliss.

  143. 30 mins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely somebody has thought of this, but why wouldn't it work? Instead of "falling back" an hour one year, we just fall back 30 mins. And stay there forever. I'm sure it would wreak some havoc on clocks/computers that are expecting changes of 60 mins., and lots of people would get confused for a few weeks, but it would only be once, and you'd get some of the benefits of both worlds.

  144. Solar Time by signingis · · Score: 1

    Calculate 12-noon for each day to be when the sun is highest. Program in variation for local municipal longitude. Bam. Good to go. For trains, computers, global schedule keeping, etc., use Zulu time.

    --

    I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
  145. 1/2 hour by krray · · Score: 1

    Here, in the midwest US, changing the clocks is completely obnoxious.

    When we spring ahead I lose TWO hours. One with the clock change, and the other changing all the clocks here and there that don't automatically update. Sure, I could change them here and there, as I come across them (which is what I typically do) -- I've also done the motion of exercise to go around and change them all at the same time. It takes an hour (yes, I apparently have that many clocks). Either I lose the hour all at once changing them at the same time, or I lose the same hour here and there. Either way I end up losing two hours over time with each spring change. I have specifically stopped buying appliances with clocks on them for just this reason (one more clock to fix)...

    When we fall back I gain nothing. I lose the hour that was gained... (see above :)

    And I noticed that the older I get the more and more this screws up my sleep (particularly in the spring for some reason).

    With or without the change there will always be a time when I get up to go to work and come home that it will be light out and completely dark. There is no point to changing the clocks.

    We should just change the clocks 1/2 an hour and be done with it...

  146. Stop using a watch ! by aviwollman · · Score: 1

    get up with dawn and go to sleep after dusk. Noon will be exactly when the sun is in mid sky. begin the month with a new moon. look outside ! and see\feel the weather changes. get back to nature !

  147. It's nice in Minnesota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice in Minnesota this time of year so you don't have to drive to work in the dark. It really helps you wake up.

    As a solution, companies could just move their start time forward. Wouldn't be any different, and it would be voluntary instead of mandatory.

  148. Simple solution. by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    Move time forward on Jan 1st, Move it back on December 31.

    Since it is a holiday anyways you can leave your damned clock alone

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  149. DST by mjtf1 · · Score: 1

    Why not move the clocks 1/2 hour and be done with it? I have wondered this for years.

  150. We Hates It, My Precious by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, really -- I hate daylight savings, with a passion. And by passion, I mean "fucking passion".

    Twice a year, my sleep cycle is systematically deranged. It's a goddamn kick to the head, and I don't mean that in a good way -- it's like the entire country gets a massive injection of jet lag extract.

    Maybe society wants to keep its members from operating at peak efficiency, so let's pull the rug from under everyone's circadian rhythms twice a year, keep 'em off balance ....

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:We Hates It, My Precious by hackiavelli · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't plan on having children. They just might kill you.

    2. Re:We Hates It, My Precious by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      First off, 1 hour is not jet lag. When I go from GMT+8 to GMT-8, that's jet lag. One hour isn't even noticable.

      Second, I live in a country with no daylight savings, and it's just stupid. In the summer, it gets dark way too early, and the sun rises at 4:30am. I just love baking in my hotbox of a room at 7:30 in the morning.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  151. 30 mins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure someone else has thought of this, so why wouldn't it work? Next time instead of "falling back" 60 mins, we just fall back 30 mins. And stay there forever. Sure it would be hard on clocks and computers expecting 60 min changes, and people would be confused for a few weeks. But it would just happen once, and you'd get some of the benefits of both times that way.

  152. Letter to Editor by shermo · · Score: 1
    --
    Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
  153. just deal with it by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    What is the best way for humans to deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year and still foster coordination over disparate time zones?

    Deal with it by remembering that it exists, and accepting it. Faking the time of day is just a way of pretending that it isn't happening, virtualizing the seasons away. Ignoring or virtualizing-away nature isn't always necessarily bad, but in this case it comes with cost and dubious gain.

    The best system to replace it? Doing nothing is better than doing anything.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  154. ftw? by Niobe · · Score: 1

    I don't know what you are talking about - Daylight Savings is for one thing and one thing only - so I can go to the beach after work.

  155. it does definitely cause a great deal of inconv... by kwerle · · Score: 1

    it does definitely cause a great deal of inconvenience

    It does? How? Whom does it inconvenience?

  156. Let's go on it permanently by chriswaco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Morning suck anyway. Let's go on DST permanently.

  157. Pick a year, then adjust the clocks by 1/2 hour... by m0ng0l · · Score: 1

    and be done with it. No more DST. So, if it were decided that next spring, would be the year, everyone would adjust their clocks by 1/2 hour forward, and then never adjust them (for DST) again. If you're a state that doesn't do DST, tough, adjust your clock to match everyone else in the time zone, you won't be doing it again, anyways.

    --
    Do you see the FNORDS? I refuse to post anonymously, as I am fireproof!
  158. Get rid of this Nonsense! by alexschmidt · · Score: 1

    Get rid of this nonsense! Last year there was a horrific school bus crash that killed a little girl and severely injured some other passengers. The driver clipped a gravel truck that was parked on the shoulder of the road. I have always believed that had the school bus driver been driving the the daylight, this never would have happened. I hate it now that I'm stumbling around in the dark while waiting for the bus and then going to work. The only 'savings time' that would make sense up here in Canada is between June 20 and September 20. It certainly makes no sense the further south you go. The differences between your longest day and shortest day don't warrant messing with the clocks.

  159. Lafayette, Indiana by DynaSoar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An area of Indiana around Lafayette (and Purdue University) doesn't observe DST. They stay the same all year while the areas around them switch back and forth. They suffer no ill effects from not changing their clocks twice a year. The further suffer no ill effects due to different amounts of light and darkness compared to their stable time system. Like the rest of the planet, those that need to resort to a world-wide time standard use Greenwich/Zulu. Once again, no ill effects of keeping the same time difference between their time standard and Greenwich/Zulu have been observed.

    I mention no ill effects because my ex-wife, who ran a substance abuse treatment center in Lafayette, and I, running one in Virginia, compared daily intake numbers for three years. Every fall, the weekend after time changed in Virginia, we had a 250% increase in admissions. She saw no such change. As to whether a sudden smack to the diurnal rhythm forcing one into crisis and so into treatment is an ill effect or a beneficial effect remains open for discussion. The vast majority of the people in the Lafayette area will continue to not care.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Lafayette, Indiana by unreceivedpacket · · Score: 1

      Indiana resident here: since 2005 all of Indiana observes DST, including Lafayette.

    2. Re:Lafayette, Indiana by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

      Indiana resident here: since 2005 all of Indiana observes DST, including Lafayette.

      Thanks for the update. Been away a while. Our numbers were from 10 years prior to the switch to DST. I'd be interested to know whether the admission number changes now match other areas. Unfortunately neither of us are still in that business.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    3. Re:Lafayette, Indiana by unreceivedpacket · · Score: 1

      Wish I could tell you, but I'm in the wrong profession. I can however tell you that the tech support calls have not changed in number and that I would like to be admitted somewhere.

  160. Wasted Energy FloridaHatesDST.org by AJ+Mexico · · Score: 1

    pixelpusher220, you have it just right. DST is energy-saving theater. It makes folks feeeeel good by fiddling with their clocks. But evidence for energy savings is unconvincing. And in states like Arizona and Florida, you want people coming home in the later evening when it's not so hot.

    --
    Computers obey me.
  161. STOP... by NickHydroxide · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hammer time?

  162. Alternatives by Hugonz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    what do you think would be the best possible system to replace DST with?

    Say, like simply freedom and the stimuli of letting electrical rates change and be variable so utilities try to flatten their demand?

  163. We can do as the Aztecs did... by tunapez · · Score: 1

    and sacrifice the blood of the Elite to appease Huitzilopochtli so he/she will make the sun return to it's zenith every winter. Makes about as much sense as playing with your clock.

    Let's start with the bankers.

    --
    Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
  164. I don't think you really understand... by blake1 · · Score: 1
    Forgive me if I have totally missed the point, but daylight savings is not to help construction workers get to the bank is it? Banks also comply to DST so the times they are open relative to the times people work are the same.

    The whole idea behind DST is it gives you time to do things after work that are more enjoyable to do in the daylight hours.. walk the dog, do the gardening, get a suntan. None of these activities would apply to the ./ reader so I am not surprised to read all the hatred.

    I, for one, am not an advocate as all this extra daylight is fading my curtains.

  165. Stop changing the clocks by stinkfish · · Score: 1

    .... and change what time you go to work/school

  166. NTP by jemenake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you look at the map of where DST is used, you'll notice that it's used more the closer you get to the poles (where there's a larger swing in the length of the day between the seasons). Now, when you realize that, then it dawns on you that there's no particular reason why there should just be a 1-hour shift for everyone in the US regardless of latitude.

    Why doesn't California have a 1-hour shift and Washington have, say, a 2-hour shift... and Alaska have an 8-hour shift? Seems asinine, right? Well, then why even have a 1-hour shift, then? It's a slippery-slope argument, but it's difficult to argue that, as sub-optimal as a "1 hour fits all" approach is, that it's any less optimal to scrap the whole thing completely.

    So, I'd can it. However, if you *really* still want it... how about this? With so many devices (computers, phones, etc.) syncing their clocks to servers, lets just have a national conversion to server-sync'd house clocks (kinda like the upcoming switch to digital TV) and then, if you really want DST, just have the servers gradually slew it in, day by day, as the sun moves toward solstice.

  167. Return our hour with interest. by AReilly · · Score: 1

    I always thought that since we have to do without an hour all summer, and then get it back as winter comes on, it would be fairer if we got it back with interest. You don't want to actually make any of the hours longer or shorter, but some hours are more valuable than others:

    Take the hour at 2AM on a Sunday morning, same as now, but return the hour at, say, 4PM on a Friday afternoon, so that we get into the weekend a bit sooner than expected...

    --
    -- Andrew
  168. Winter time is standard time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand your argument. If we abandon DST then time in the winter would be unchanged. Everyone that can go to the bank now will still be able to do so. The change (if we abandon DST) would only affect time in the summer.

  169. I always wondered what it would be like... by 80's+Greg · · Score: 1

    If we eliminated time zones and the globe were all on the same time.

    --
    I gotta have more cowbell.
  170. Gandalf! by lymond01 · · Score: 1

    If you were a proper wizard, these problems would not apply to you.

  171. easy solution by TRRosen · · Score: 1

    I call it the light bulb.......

  172. My preference: DST all year round by Repton · · Score: 1

    I live in New Zealand -- we are at GMT+12 "normally" (the date-line bends around us) and GMT+13 in summer time. We don't seem to get the big arguments about DST that other countries do, but some people (probably particularly farmers) don't like it.

    Me: I think we should scrap it -- and move to GMT+13 all year round. It's not the time we "should" have, based on the sun, but who cares? The standard daily routine here is that your free time is after work. Daylight in the evening is useful; we should maximise it all year round. Daylight in the morning is mostly wasted. People who rely on daylight to work? Well, they're at the mercy of the sun anyway. At least this way, they don't have to get up so early :-)

    People who want to get rid of DST: I'm sympathetic to the idea that changing time-zones is a pain. But please don't take away my evening daylight!

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    1. Re:My preference: DST all year round by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 3, Funny

      A little known fact: Working from 8 to 4 (or 8 to 5, or 9 to 6, etc, etc) does NOT cause spontaneous combustion in humans! In fact, studies have proven that going to work at the same time every day doesn't even depend on what arbitrary number is being pointed to on ANY device, be it a thermostat, clock, or even altimeter.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    2. Re:My preference: DST all year round by Repton · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but changing the time-zone is a lot easier than getting every school, university and business in the country to standardise on an earlier starting time.

      Sure, I could get earlier hours, but it wouldn't help if everyone else is in work until sundown.

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    3. Re:My preference: DST all year round by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      If you've ever had to deal with a business (or person, for that matter) who doesn't live in the same time zone, you already know how meaningless that is.

      Not everyone needs to do everything at the same time. It's easier for one company to change their schedule than for the whole nation to agree to do so, and there are in fact some companies which, noting the stupidity of DST, change their hours at certain times of the year. Noticing that the sun is setting earlier is not the time to say "Let's run with it and make it look like the sun is setting EVEN EARLIER!", it's the time to say "Hey, boss, mind if I start coming in at eight and leaving at four so I don't get hit by quite so many buses on the way home?"

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  173. I hate it in Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Indiana, where we just switched to DST this year, it screwed up my daily schedule all summer. Getting up early in the morning now meant it was dark in the middle of the summer! It used to be my favorite time of day when the sun was out and it was still quiet outside. We switched just because we had to associate with one time zone or the other, not because it helps us.

    IU did a study and said it cost the state 3 million more in energy costs or something like that.

    My Grandpa used to work for the railroad when they had a timezone map for every minute. Each station was set separately - but that was when Union Station had the official time...

  174. This is a hell of an Ask Slashdot by IronChef · · Score: 1

    Most of the time, the questions are like this:

    "I need to do X, and everyone else does it with Google, but I don't want to use Google so what else should I try? Also, I am a cheapskate who knows nothing about the issue."

    But THIS guy... This guy has much bigger plans.

    "What is the best way for humans to deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year and still foster coordination over disparate time zones?"

    He's not just buying an oscilloscope, or trying to find a way to do something without Google. He's solving one of humanity's problems.

    Oonce we arrive at a solution, implementation will probably be trivial. I can hardly wait! (If there are any snags another Ask Slashdot should do the trick.)

  175. That's easy... by webview · · Score: 1

    Stardates

  176. How 'bout this? by juliohm · · Score: 1

    JUST WAKE UP AN HOUR EARLIER! Ok, people! Let's shift hour work hours so we can all get here earlier and go home while it's still bright. If everyone saves one hour of electricity every for the whole summer, that's a very super savings for the whole country! Horray! But wait... everyone's lazy to do that... so let's force the whole country to change their clocks ahead one hour. Better yet... we'll chose a different day to start doing this every year. I'll bet the IT guys will love the idea. Very easy to implement! That's all DST was made for. Wake up earlier, go home earlier, and save on electricity bills everywhere. If people would just quit being lazy, we wouldn't have to keep doing this every damn year. Another, sensible alternative is to fix a freaking start/finish date for this thing and ONLY change it when we notice the planet's axis just moved a few degrees.

    --
    Julio Henrique Morimoto juliohm@gmail.com
  177. 28 hour day by joemawlma · · Score: 1

    I always found the 28 hour day to be a great idea.

    only 6 days in the week though.

    http://www.dbeat.com/28/

  178. I found the flaw in your plan ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    (yes this would take some planning by management)

    You must be new here ...

  179. The Sun is not a bulb by violet16 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to stereotype Slashdot readers or anything, but I notice nobody sees any difference between sunlight and electric light. If you go outdoors during the day, you may be surprised to find daylight has many ambient properties not provided by your basement's fluorescent bulb (warmth, happy feelings, etc).

    1. Re:The Sun is not a bulb by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Not to stereotype Slashdot readers or anything, but I notice nobody sees any difference between sunlight and electric light. If you go outdoors during the day, you may be surprised to find daylight has many ambient properties not provided by your basement's fluorescent bulb (warmth, happy feelings, etc).

      It's not my fault your world orbits a ball of fire.

      Your star burns! I require frozen treats.

    2. Re:The Sun is not a bulb by interploy · · Score: 1

      Most of the states that supposedly benefit from DST have actual winters. I don't know where you live, but here in Kansas no one is thinking about the wonders of sunlight when it's 10F outside. The closest you get is a fond wistfulness for summer.

      There's also the fact that this "extra daytime" is at the beginning of the day, when the vast majority of people need to be heading off to work anyway. And by the time they get out again it's already dusk.

      So while I agree that benefits of sunlight are great, the majority of people either can't (because they're at work) or won't (because it's bitter ass cold outside) take advantage of them.

    3. Re:The Sun is not a bulb by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      Not to stereotype Slashdot readers or anything, but I notice nobody sees any difference between sunlight and electric light. If you go outdoors during the day, you may be surprised to find daylight has many ambient properties not provided by your basement's fluorescent bulb (warmth, happy feelings, etc).

      Sounds like someone needs to ask his Mommy for a broad spectrum fluorescent bulb!

    4. Re:The Sun is not a bulb by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      (and skin cancer, early blindness, etc...)

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:The Sun is not a bulb by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Sun is, in terms of the impact it has on Earth, pretty much just a *REALLY BIG* incandescent bulb.

      Personally, I grew up on Northeastern Ohio, where it's generally overcast three hundred and sixty-some days a year, and I've never really gotten used to the idea of broad daylight being significantly brighter than what you get indoors from a couple of 60-watt lamps. (When we moved to Michigan, the sky was blue, and I got out a camera and took photographs, because I'd grown up thinking "the sky is blue" was a weird cultural invention that had nothing to do with reality; everyone who looks up outside can see the sky is actually dull grey.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    6. Re:The Sun is not a bulb by try_anything · · Score: 1

      I went to school in southeastern Ohio and always wondered if the Native Americans who lived there had a word for the sun. Nah, I thought, they probably just thought that clouds glowed in the daytime and stopped glowing at night. They would have to have advanced statistical techniques and many years of astronomical observations before they realized that there was a slightly brighter patch in the clouds that appeared in the east every morning and traveled westward during the day. Then, maybe some clever guy could hypothesize that the bright patch was caused by a big ball of fire somewhere behind the clouds, and everyone would laugh at him.

      I am so glad I don't live there anymore. I grew up in the blazing sun, so even though my skin is poorly adapted to it, I'm dependent on it for my sanity. Between dying early of skin cancer and spending 95% of every year deeply depressed by the lack of sunlight, I'll take skin cancer, thank you very much.

      I know, I should have bought a broad-spectrum lamp. Too late. My skin is fucked, so I might as well embrace the sunlight.

  180. easiest solution by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    Go into Daylight Savings Time one year, and never come out. No more changing during the year. Many countries don't bother, so it's obviously possible.

  181. That's a great idea! by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    Instead of changing the clocks, businesses should just say "Summer hours: 9am-5pm, winter hours: 8am-4pm.

    That's a great idea!

    However, if every business decided on its own when summer and winter hours started, then during spring and fall, there would be serious confusion about whether any one given establishment you deal with was on summer or winter hours. Therefore, we need to take your idea one step further, and set national standard dates for when everybody should switch between summer and winter hours (except for states that don't want to do it, like Arizona, of course).

    Also, many localities have laws or regulations that refer to specific times. Things like "no parking from 9am-5pm," or "drinking establishments must close by 2am." We just need to change all those laws, regulations and signs so that they use different summer and winter hours for the official summer hours and winter hours periods of the year.

    We should really work to make this happen. I propose a recurring meeting on the first Saturday of every month, at noon during summer hours and 11am in winter hours. (Oh, oops, sorry, I forgot to add: I'm provisionally assuming that summer hours start when that awful DST contraption starts, and end when DST ends.)

    1. Re:That's a great idea! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking around, but you do realize that a lot of businesses already do extended "holiday hours" leading up to Christmas? Many of them start right around the same time we switch off of DST anyway, so it's not like it's a completely foriegn idea.

  182. You're missing the point. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    Did you know that sales of Swatch Internet Time watches doubled between 1998 and 1999?

    So they sold eight instead of four?

    Dude, don't underestimate the power of exponential growth. If they keep doing that for a while, this is so gonna be the Swatch century.

  183. Easier solution by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    No big deal. When you need to move the clocks back, pull the main breaker at midnight, wait an hour, and turn the juice back on. When you need to move them forward, pull the breaker at 10:59, wait a minute, and put it back on. All your digital clocks now way 12:00. 12:00 12:00. What could go wrong ... go wrong ... go wrong ...

  184. Split the difference by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    Split the difference, set it to 30 minutes between standard and DST then leave it there. Everyone is equally happy and unhappy. Maybe this is too much common sense for the goverments around the world.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  185. Such a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST truly is just a dumb idea now. Sure it may benefit a few, but at the cost of numerous others. Consider the lost productivity from people being late, along with the costs of having to inform people of what day to set clocks forward or backwards.

    And on top of that, there still being daylight when the average person gets home means more cooling costs, or it being dark when you wake up means more heating, along with general sluggishness.

    And then there is the immense joy of for part of the year having the sun blaring in your face the whole time you drive home. I so love winter if I get off work at 5pm. Almost my entire drive home is in a western direction which means sun in my face. How does that not cause accidents? People in my town drive like crazy folks no matter what the conditions.

    Just get rid of it, we don't need all the hassle and problems just for the few DST benefits.

  186. No longer needed, annoying as all shit, drop it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between caffeine and fluorescent lighting, we don't need it anymore and it only causes confusion and sleep deprivation.

  187. Kadmos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should keep it exactly the same but call it something different to make it better. Instead of Dayling savings Time it should be called:
    Freedom Saving Time!

    Everybody will love it and the govt can get more votes.

  188. Saskatchewan is more north than you... by h4w6af6oitsbn7pc · · Score: 1

    Saskatchewan is a prairie province in Canada. Biggest industry is farming, so if anyone is affected by daylight it would be them. And they do not practice DST. Biggest argument I've heard against it yet...

  189. I'm at a loss of words here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > What is the best way for humans to deal with the inconsistent amount of light over the year ... ?

    Maybe, just maybe, 10 fsck*g million years weren't enough to make us well prepared for this "inconsistent amount of light over the year"... what if we wait another million to see how things settle up?

    Frankly, this is what I really dislike about engineering thinking: trying to adapt humans to inventions and not the other way around.

    Please explain to me how is an astronomer going to profit from this daylight bullshit?

    I guess I must be grateful they haven't the means to make constant daylight... yet... >:-/

  190. The only thing I care about... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Is Microsoft Outlook going to screw me over once again during this time change? How many meetings will I be an hour late/early for this time?

  191. Split the difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shift by 30 minutes..once, and be done with it.

    Nuff said.

  192. Simply change schedules by solferino · · Score: 1

    My answer is simple. Just change schedules rather than the clock during the seasons.

    We live in a post-industrial society. The majority of people have the personal flexibility to change their work start and end times through the year. For workplaces which still run on an industrial model and for schools I suggest they simply have a summer start time and winter start time.

    Changing the clock is simply bizarre.

  193. Just stay on DST by BBandCMKRNL · · Score: 1

    I'd much rather drive to work in the dark, I do it now anyway, than drive home in the dark.

    --
    Without the 2nd Amendment, the others are just suggestions.
  194. Re:Metric time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh excellent, not only are the trains now running on time, they're running on metric time.

    Remember this time people, 80 past 2 on April 47th, it's the dawn of a new enlightenment!

  195. Daylight savings, saving who? by ramriot · · Score: 1

    None of this makes any sense in this 24h, online world. Why not just abandon the whole timezone illusion altogether.

    For the purpose of timekeeping and keeping everyone in sync, have everyone use Universal Time (UT) or GMT which is more or less the same thing. The military have done this for years calling it Zulu time.

    For working days, everyone adopt flexy-time dependant on who and where you have to report with is. Go in at a time that suites you and work your agreed hours.

    For media, release programming, world wide at a specific time (we are going to timeshift anyway) so why not take advantage and shortcut the cross border pirates grabbing media early.

    Advantages:-

    No rush hours = fuel savings + less accidents + lower stress levels.

    International Trade improved by knowing when a meeting starts and being there.

    Education, once taught in schools that the position of the sun related to the clock depends on where you are then every child will now have an accurate mental image of our rotating world. Thus being able to see us a one world, one people, clinging to a thin veneer of habitability on a fragile world.

    That way at least if they survive our mistake, the next generation will not repeat them.

  196. Abolish DST and Timezones too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed -- it is nearly time to celebrate "National Pointless Mess with Everyone's Circadian Rhythm Day" -- I'm for abolishing it. Timezones too, while we're at it.

    UTC FOR ALL!

  197. Personally I like DST... by Eskarel · · Score: 1
    I've lived in places that had it, and I now live in places that don't(though the government is trying to pass it, and we're having a trial atm).

    Aside from all the dreadful inconvenience of dealing with people in areas whose clocks have changed when ours haven't(I live in Perth Australia and dealing with the east with a 3 hour time difference is a PITA, everyone over there already wants to ignore the west and three hour time differences just make it easier), it's nice to get home to some daylight.

    I'm not a morning person, I've never been a morning person, and I sort of reckon that, given that dawn in summer here without DST is something like 4:30 AM, that the early risers can give up an hour of their daylight to give me an hour to something done in the evening. I quite like actually getting home before it's too dark to anything much outside, and I see an awful lot of families out during DST that you don't see without it.

    The basic thing of DST is that some places need it, and if some people are going to do it, then it becomes terribly inconvenient for people who don't do it to deal with people who do. Given that remembering to change your clocks twice a year(on a sunday, with, in every place I've ever lived constant reminders in every form of media) isn't all that much work, and that unless you're trying to milk it to prove how horrible the time shift is most halfway normal people shouldn't even be noticing the time shift in their sleep patterns for more than a week at most, everyone may as well do it.

  198. Write to CONGRESS!! by Darkk · · Score: 1

    We can bitch..moan..and complain on slashdot.com but it's not getting anywhere.

    WRITE TO CONGRESS AND BITCH AT THEM!!

    Democracy at work!

  199. Ask Congress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you ask Congress, you'll get all sorts of arguments about why going onto Daylight Savings Time is so wonderful - it's so good that they extended the dates.

    Um, if it's so good, how about just staying on it full time? We wouldn't ever have to change clocks then. Don't abolish DST, abolish standard time!

  200. Middle Ground? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't we all just set our clocks 30 minutes ahead or behind one time and leave it at that?!

  201. Not trolling at all! by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

    Aha!! Finally, a voice that echos my own feeling on DST: the only good thing about it is that day we "get an extra hour of sleep"

    Well, years ago, I decided if I ever ran for public office the chief plank of my platform would be the eradication of DST, but instead of replacing it with "do nothing", I decided it'd be better to replace it with "Do more (LOTS more) of just the good part" -- specifically, that "fall back" part (the part where the benefits really do outweigh the inconvenience.) I'd propose that we not just turn the clocks back one hour once a year, but that we turn the clocks back one hour on the 1st and 15th of the month. Every month. We'd just dispense with the "spring forward" part (the part everybody hates anyway; the all inconvenience and no payback part.)
     
    With 24 hours in a day, and 12 months in a year, at the end of one full year we'd be right back where we started on the clock, but we'd have gained an entire day over the course of the past year (though since it was spread evenly across the year instead of given to us in one day, like a "leap day", we'd get the true benefit of it in extra rest instead of being tempted to blow it partying. Plus, if we timed the starting point right, you could easily have all the wintertime after-work daylight you wanted!!) Imagine all that boosted productivity the Monday after the time change, twenty-four times each and every year!!
     
    Hey, I figure if we're gonna screw with the clocks we might as well maximize our returns (and it's really no crazier than what we do now. That or it's 24 times crazier.)

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  202. Daylight Savings Time? by SiMahDan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DST should be eliminated. We're in a global economy and out of sync 1/2 the year with most of the planet. DST does not "Save" a single minute nor does it add a single minute to the amount of daylight on any day of the year. For those worried about outside activities during the dark hours, they should adjust their own schedules. Kids should not walk to school in the dark. There are carpools and buses for many. while schools could easily adjust their starting hours. There is nothing more Socialist than forcing the entire American society to conform to the fears of some parents and the inflexibility of many school administrators.

  203. WTF by Migity · · Score: 1

    Fuck it...let's just let everybody set their clocks to whatever they like and make the changing as random as possible. Oh wait...

  204. An Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sick of the sun getting up when it freakin wants to. There should be 2^5 hours in a day, 2^6 minutes in an hour and 2^7 seconds in a minute. Every day the sun should rise at 2^4 and set at 2^0-1 oclock with the length of minutes varying according to the time of the year and day. This would reduce the amount of stupid people attending meetings and fix the economy.

  205. just go up earlier? by Mirar · · Score: 1

    Why not keep it simple?

    If the problem is that we should go up earlier in summer, go up earlier?

    If people can't go up earlier on their own, change work and school hours to match the sunlight. It can't be that hard.

    And leave the poor time alone!

    DST doesn't solve the problem we're after. It solves the problem that workplaces don't want to change the time people start work. Which solves the problem that people don't want to wake up earlier. (Which, as far as I've seen, solves the problem that people are in traffic earlier, so less traffic accidents due to ... wait? less sunlight? I'm confused here.)

    (And I agree with UTC. There isn't any real need for local timezones; but that step might be too early for now. China has one beautiful single six hours wide timezone, iirc, but they can do what they want without anyone protesting.)

  206. DST doesn't work as promised by oscariommi · · Score: 0

    The suckiest idea since the invention of the mechanical clock. And the digital ones.

    Sun goes up - day begins. Sun goes down - day ends. Simple.

    Or... as in my case: I code manically 'til about 7.00 in the morning, then sleep 'til about 15.00 in the afternoon. Unless someone calls me and wakes me up earlier.

    That gives me: no daylight.

    You can see how much in need of DST I am!

    On the other hand, today I'm up early (because I went to bed 20.00 yesterday after a two day coding maraton. Yeah, I think I might have some kind of disorder, but I squeezed in some skate boarding for health...)

  207. i abstained by cathector · · Score: 1

    i abstained from DST one year,
    and got to be dickish about it,
    eg when she said "so let's meet at 7",
    i could put on my best geek-snob voice and say "oh, do you mean 6 ? because i don't participate in DST".

    needless to say, i got so much action that year that it began to impinge on my nethack time, so i had to develop a whole new radical playing style which turned out to finally be the key to ascending as a pacifist caveman.

    but seriously, i did abstain one year, and had to give it up because the social overhead was just too high.

  208. My favourite: by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    Flexitime! (If augmented by telecommuting, even better.)

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  209. DST is contributing to chaos by Max_W · · Score: 1

    It makes life for software engineers more difficult, systems more complicated and less reliable.

    What is really bad is that countries begin and end DST almost randomly without any standard.

    People do not use approaches which could really save energy, like: drying clothing on the sun, instead ineffective expensive solar panels, energy saving lamps, instead DST, light aluminum cars, instead heavy electric cars with toxic batteries, etc.

  210. This guy is right by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    Everyone should just get up, send their kids to school, go to work, take lunch, clock off, pick up the kids from soccer, grab dinner and go to bed an hour later/earlier depending on the time of year and the preferred amount of daylight.

    Now if there were just some universally recognised way we could coordinate everyone in the northern hemisphere to do it at the same time then it'd be a smooth transition.

    Can anyone think of one? Or how about we all agree to set our clocks +/- one hour and then just do everything by-the-clock like we normally do.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  211. created by a half-wit at the very least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder which dim-witted moron every thought up the concept of DST.
    I work with people from different time zones and just use UTC for scheduling any event. Almost everyone knows the diff between their time and UTC and so this keeps thing clear.

  212. Drop the ridiculously broken Gregorian calendar by TechnicalThug · · Score: 0

    Perhaps adopt a more real-world cyclical calendar (think lunar phases), rather than the mental hang-ups of a Pope.

  213. I'm sure no one has mentioned this yet by dgun · · Score: 1

    How about not doing it?

    --
    FAQs are evil.
  214. New Earth Time by joker784 · · Score: 0

    I just discovered New Earth Time (which is UTC times 15 to get to a 360 degrees clock). http://www.newearthtime.net/ By far the best suggestion I have ever seen.

  215. back in the ussr! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they ran the empire on moscow time...

  216. We are currently in DST!! by n0vh · · Score: 1

    Day Light Savings time ISN'T about to be upon us. We are CURRENTLY IN DST!! We are about to change back to Standard time though.

  217. not really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9-5 was a 20th century thing...before that, really before unions had gained much sway, people were working 10-12 hr days...

    in particular, miners never saw the sun:-(

    i knew a descendant of h.c. frick, of homestead strike-busting fame...a family story had h.c. delaying the time whistle to weasel more work out of his peons, and when they complained, banned pocket watches.

    when the workers reverted to telling time by the sun, he had the windows painted black...

  218. Binary time by Loki_666 · · Score: 0

    Two variants of binary time here:

    1) The JBC binary clock under linux was always fun... "Whats the time?" "1001 10011 PM"

    2) Basic - 1 or 0. Either it is or it isnt ;-)

  219. GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone start using ZULU or GMT. Then your employer or state or country or whatever tells you what hours you work, go to school, or whatever. No changing clocks, when a business partner, customer, or anyone says call me at 1700, it's the same time no matter where you live no need to figure out what timezone they're in compared to you.

  220. Change work and school timings, not the clock by codekavi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A good solution would be to just have businesses and schools decide when they want to open. The TZ stays the same all year round. If a business or school wants to open early, or late, it's their decision, and their responsibility to advertise the timings.

  221. As someone who lives in Melbourne Australia by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I feel genuinely sorry for people who live in even colder, darker, miserable places than us, during winter.

    I don't want to start the debate with the non DST people, they are welcome to their opinion and good for them.
    I for one am a very very strong believer in DST and feel it gives me more sunlight during hours I can actually make use of it.
    I also believe in this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seasonal_affective_disorder
    Winter is genuinely depressing, as someone who is frequently depressed, to be honest I'd be entirely happy to have PERMENANT DST of about 90 minutes in Melbourne, just so the sun goes down that bit later in winter for us to enjoy it, even if it's not warm.

    I can honestly say since we switched this past few weeks, I already honestly feel happier, quite seriously, it's warmer, it's brighter and I'm happier.

    DST 4 all.

  222. Security reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Brazil, half the country (the south most part - where there's the largest population) has DST for 5 months. We've been struggling with energy supply shortage for a number of years now.

    Whitout the DST we would have two things happening at the same time: public lights been turned on and people getting home from work at 6PM (we usually work from 8AM-6PM with a 2 hour lunch break) and turning on their home equipments.

    With the DST, sunset is postponed to 7PM and the impact on the energy consumption is reduced.

    That's why, for "security reasons", we have been adopting DST since the 30's.

    (Oh, and a funny thing: DST means STD in portuguese =D)

  223. There is already a solution UTC by Danathar · · Score: 1

    It's called Universal Time Coordinated.

    Zulu and GMT are depreciated.

  224. 1 time the world over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST should vanish, along with time zones. One world time should be implemented. If it is Noon in NYC it is Noon in LA, London, Tokyo, etc.

    It may take some time getting the dark/light issues, but after a generation passes, nobody will notice.

  225. split the difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't we just fall back 30 minutes and never mess with the clocks again?

  226. Jet Lag by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    First off, 1 hour is not jet lag. When I go from GMT+8 to GMT-8, that's jet lag. One hour isn't even noticable.

    You're right, I exaggerated.

    I should have said, "subclinical dosage of jet lag extract."

    --
    -kgj
  227. um, I think it Standard Time that's almost upon us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never understood the change to DST every spring, just as the days are getting longer anyway, we screw with the clocks??

    but it's standard time we're changing to soon, not DST..(maybe the southern hemisphere does it backwards)

  228. DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's simple... instead of moving it an hour forward, or an hour backward... adjust the time by 1/2 hour and leave it alone.

  229. Follow the Chinese model by DuBois · · Score: 1

    The entire country of China is one time zone. There is no daylight savings time in China.

    Is it possible that having just one time zone that doesn't change is one of the reasons why China's economy is growing at 10% per year while Americans have to make do with 3% growth at the most (and currently, very likely negative growth)?

    --
    The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
  230. Daylight saving time almost upon us??? by neuromancer2701 · · Score: 1

    Daylight saving time is not almost upon us, it is almost over.

    --
    "If you like Battlestar Galactica, you're probably a huge nerd." -Stephen Colbert
  231. move it to the middle and leave it alone by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    duh.

    if businesses want to change their hours to take advantage of light differences, fine, but there's no practical reason to change the damned time.

  232. WTF? It's easy! by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

    Just remember to fall forward and spring back. How hard is this?

  233. Stop -- Hammer Time! by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    And of course - Hammer Time.

    Man, can you imagine if the US government declared that from now on, from April through November, was non-stop Hammer Time? TV stations would remind you it was coming up, and then when it finally happened they'd say "STOP! Hammer Time!"and everybody would wear parachute pants and dance sideways for the next seven months...

    I'm sure lots of people would question the practical benefits of having Hammer Time for more than half the year - but then somebody would spout off misinformation about how it's good for farmers, or saves energy (everybody Hammer-dancing to and from work, etc.), or some other BS like that...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  234. My Last Job... by idiotnot · · Score: 1

    We were a subcontractor to a larger company on a government project. The project office was in a county that didn't do DST, while the prime's office was in a county that did. Serious confusion during the summer, especially since I'm on the east coast, and don't normally have to deal with that sort of thing. :-)

  235. Native-American viewpoint... by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Only a white man would think that cutting off the top foot of a blanket and sewing onto the bottom would result in a longer blanket."

  236. Move to Saskatchewan by thepacketmaster · · Score: 1

    The cows don't care whether it's daylight or not when you milk them. They just care how warm are your hands.

    --

    --

    Luck is just skill you didn't know you had.

  237. Look everyone: It's "WickedStupid" at /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then we shall ignore you, and your latest episode of the "WickedStupid show" airing here, at slashdot.

  238. 30 minutes in the middle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just put the time 30 minutes in the middle everywhere? This would make everyone happy... a one time change

  239. anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about we split the difference and "fall back half an hour and leave it there. Most of the world is operating 24/7 nowadays. OK the banks close, but you can still get money at an ATM or make a transfer online. Stores are open later than 5pm, the stock market closes but there is still trading through overseas exchanges. If you look at states or cities that did not change time they have survived and the savings is negligible as far as energy. What you save in the morning you invariably use in the evening. DST had its purpose once but the world has changed, we need to catch-up.

  240. Re:How about this? SAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A color temp of 3500K and a CRI of 100 is a perfect light bulb for home use. Those "full spectrum" bulbs are 6200K with a CRI of maybe 60. Incandescent bulbs are usually around 3200 with a CRI VERY close to 100.

    The color temp of sunlight is over 5500K. I guess you consider the world too blue!

  241. Night Shift by gpm · · Score: 0

    Can we get rid before weekend please?

    I am on night shift Saturday and what should be a twelve hour shift becomes a thirteen hour shift.

    Joy.

    Course in past years I have worked the Spring clock change and you didn't hear me complain then about only having to work an eleven shift.

  242. Re:Move to Arizona? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks. I don't want to live in a racist shithole.

  243. Just leave time alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just time alone. Winter days are shorter than summer, big deal. Live with it and leave the clocks alone...

    Under a rock in Sugar Land ;)
    ps - Linux rules!

  244. We have these things called "seasons" by Strake · · Score: 1

    Inconsistent light over the course of a year, eh? Quit bitching. Earth has had seasons since time immemorial. If you can't deal with it, I suggest that you move to the Equator, where each and every day lasts 12 hours almost exactly. Some variation in day length is no reason to change our clocks twice a year.

    As a bit of an amateur astronomer, I find daylight savings especially irritating, because in the summer, while it is in effect, the sun is up longer _anyhow_, so it gets dark later in the first place. If the DST people had given it any thought at all, they would save daylight in the winter.

    Anyhow, I'm off to Saskatchewan. Farewell.