Slashdot Mirror


Magnetic Poles May Be About To Flip

AGD writes "According to the Guardian, Earth's magnetic field - the force that protects us from deadly radiation bursts from outer space - is weakening dramatically. . The article goes on to say 'Earth's magnetic field has disappeared many times before -- as a prelude to our magnetic poles flipping over, when north becomes south and vice versa.'"

640 comments

  1. I remember seeing this on sightings years ago... by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 3, Funny

    The date for the flip will be 5/5/2005, according to Sightings.

  2. First lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the magnetic field vanishes, surely our compasses will stop working?

    1. Re:First lost by matttastic · · Score: 1

      *STANDS UP AND STARTS CLAPPING* well, they'll stop "working" while it flips, but when it's over they'll work, just backwards.

    2. Re:First lost by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

      I hope I can get a firmware upgrade for my compass, when this happens.

      Bring on the open-hardware compasses!

      --
      -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
  3. Holy Shit! by JuiceRat00 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    OMG I hope they figure out when this happens so I can jump at the last second to avoid getting smashed.

    1. Re:Holy Shit! by shtarker · · Score: 1

      That won't save you! It's duck and cover, duck and cover!

  4. compass business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i thought south was finally due to be north, should i start making reverse compasses?

    i hereby patent the above idea.

  5. Newsflash: by Mac+Nazgul · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In related news, the Earth's computer systems imploded after they began to run backward.

    1. Re:Newsflash: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that we can pull a scam on businesses similiar to Y2K? I could use the extra cash.

    2. Re:Newsflash: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stock options, man: they don't count as an expense. The public will NEVER figure it out. BTW, what year is this? 1999?

    3. Re:Newsflash: by Shanep · · Score: 5, Informative

      You think that we can pull a scam on businesses similiar to Y2K?

      The Y2K bug was not a scam. However it was exploited and hyped by scammers.

      I was working for a company in 1996 whose business critical systems running on big VAXen were demostratable to fail on the development machines when the clock was wound forward. They were working on the bugs for years.

      And there WERE some Y2K failures. Few enough though, for people to beleive it was a hoax, but this is because most systems were fixed! If nothing were done, many things would have failed with varying degrees.

      If nothing had been done, it would not have been hype at all.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    4. Re:Newsflash: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You think that we can pull a scam on businesses similiar to Y2K? I could use the extra cash."

      Shhhhh, shut up, you're gonna ruin it for the rest of us...!!

    5. Re:Newsflash: by CharlieG · · Score: 2

      I agree totally - I was involved in a Y2K re-write. We kept the old system online for kicks (the users could NOT get to it) - dramatic failure at changeover. The new system didn't even burp

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    6. Re:Newsflash: by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 2

      True, but I think the real scam artists were all the companies/analysts/hacks who convinced PC users that their machine required some sort of Y2K update. Or better yet, the "consultants" advising companies without major computer systems; i.e. office machines only, that they needed to worry about anything (and pay massive consulting fees to get it fixed, of course). That pissed me off every time I read something about it.

    7. Re:Newsflash: by Shanep · · Score: 2

      "consultants"

      That's the new word for "salesman" isn't it?

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    8. Re:Newsflash: by Scooter · · Score: 2

      I did a short contract for a railway maintenance company back in 1999, and the y2k compliance guy was constantly getting requests for y2k compliance certificates for stuff like railway sleepers, bolts, and well - anything really. Must have done wonders for his self image - knowing what a vital job he was doing LOL :)

    9. Re:Newsflash: by Deven · · Score: 2

      And there WERE some Y2K failures. Few enough though, for people to beleive it was a hoax, but this is because most systems were fixed! If nothing were done, many things would have failed with varying degrees.

      If nothing had been done, it would not have been hype at all.


      I agree. It's like the recriminations happening now around September 11. Everyone wants to know why nobody did anything to stop people from crashing planes into buildings. Suppose someone had hyped it up years ago, and made a big deal of keeping it from happening? Suppose they were successful? September 11 never would have happened, but we'd probably have people claiming it was bogus, that we were protecting against a non-existent risk, and it was a complete waste of money.

      Hindsight is 20/20. People claim Y2K wasn't a big deal because others were actually successul at fixing most of the problems! Y2K rolled over with nary a hitch, causing people to think it must not have been an issue after all. We could have used a high-profile disaster or two, to convince everyone that their Y2K diligence wasn't wasted! (Of course, some scammers did jump on Y2K, but there was a real issue to worry about too.)

      Actually, a friend of mine was listening to ham radio during the rollover, and heard about an alarming near-disaster. Apparently, one of the nuclear missile silos in Russia malfunction due to a Y2K bug and got well into the launch sequence before they managed to shut it down! (Far enough that the launch doors were supposedly opened to prepare for a launch.)

      Of course, we didn't hear anything about this in the mainstream press, but there was such fear and paranoia about Y2K that they probably hushed up stories that didn't seem serious enough to risk hysteria over... (I heard rumors of other Y2K failures that weren't reported, or were ascribed to some other convenient cause.) Perhaps there were enough actual failures to demonstrate the risk, but if most were covered up, is it any surprise that people now consider the whole thing a hoax?

      --

      Deven

      "Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay

    10. Re:Newsflash: by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      I know that if all the Y2K errors I fixed in 1999 had happened all at once, it would have been a mess! There's a big difference between having 1 to 5 years to find & fix problems, and having everything blow up at once.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  6. Hrmm by acehole · · Score: 5, Funny

    How is santa going to navigate under those conditions?

    perhaps he better upgrade rudolph.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:Hrmm by dincubus · · Score: 1

      just as long as he doesn't upgrade rudolph to XP or 2000. if he does, then we're all screwed. by the time he would end up loading and converting the good girls and boys database, as well as the bad boys and girls database.. the entire christmas holiday will be gone and quite possibly new years as well

      --
      a wise man once said "two wrongs dont make a right, but three rights do make a left" and that wise man was gallagher
    2. Re:Hrmm by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      I'm sure Santa has a deceant GPS unit. :)

    3. Re:Hrmm by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Never mind Santa, how will I navigate. Will I be coming or going after the poles flip ?

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    4. Re:Hrmm by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      " I'm sure Santa has a deceant GPS unit. :)"

      Given that the GPS sats would be taken out by the EM blast, he'd still be lost.

      graspee

    5. Re:Hrmm by shtarker · · Score: 1

      Woah there the article said gradually filp and reverse. It didn't mention anything about gigantic EM blasts disabeling the north pole.
      But his GPS would still be rendered useless by the ionosphere disabeling all low earth satelites.

    6. Re:Hrmm by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      Oops, my bad. I just read in the article about the satelites and assumed there would be an EM burst.

      I suppose I was a bit surprised that people weren't more worried about an EM burst, and planning on shielding all their computers...

      graspee

    7. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this gonna be like daylight savings time? Am I gonna hafta change my compass twice a year?

    8. Re:Hrmm by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      I just read in the article about the satelites and assumed there would be an EM burst.

      *blink*

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    9. Re:Hrmm by flewp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whee. Another excuse to bash MS. I mean c'mon, does EVERYTHING have to somehow be turned into some MS bashing comment? Why don't you use something like "Good luck finding supported drivers for Rudolph's red nose in linux."
      Either all this MS bashing is because of a lack of anything intelligent to say, or slashdotter's just aren't that creative or funny.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    10. Re:Hrmm by Nomad37 · · Score: 1
      Either all this MS bashing is because of a lack of anything intelligent to say, or slashdotter's just aren't that creative or funny.

      pick one...

      --
      Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will! - Antonio Gramsci.
    11. Re:Hrmm by hype7 · · Score: 2
      How is santa going to navigate under those conditions?

      perhaps he better upgrade rudolph.


      I'm looking forward to all the maps of the world being redrawn... with Australia on the top, where it belongs :)

      -- james
  7. Is it time... by n08ody · · Score: 1, Funny

    to call my hero Bruce Willis?

    1. Re:Is it time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you hero a favor and get him a better shaver.

  8. Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it, I only just fall out of bed and switch on my computer, and this is the headline I am greeted with.

    Damn, its good to be alive.

  9. I remember this from a few months ago by humming · · Score: 5, Informative

    And here is the link: Poles are about to shift

    --
    I'm too stupid to preview.
    1. Re:I remember this from a few months ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah. The New Scientist. That then settles. It must definitely be true.

    2. Re:I remember this from a few months ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, hands up anyone briefly thought "Don't they mean GnuScientist?"

    3. Re:I remember this from a few months ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Differences between the two articles:

      "...could disappear over the next 1,000 years."
      vs.
      "the Earth's dipole will disappear within just two millennia."

      "Reversals happen every 250,000 years or so, and as there has not been one for almost a million years, we are due one soon."
      vs.
      "The last reversal happened about 780,000 years ago"

      Crackpots!

  10. Re:I remember seeing this on sightings years ago.. by 26199 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'Could be in the next 1000 years', according to the article...

    A little less concerning :-)

  11. Photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The effects of a pole switch can be seen here. For your convenience it includes both a Summer and Winter view.

    1. Re:Photo by trybywrench · · Score: 1

      Is that a ramp up to the first floor? I wonder who thought that up. Scientists are so cool.

      --
      I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
  12. nope by tanveer1979 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There can be no particular date.
    The change will be gradual, with about a thousand years of no field. But I wont worry about it. There is no precedent of extinction due to pole reversal.
    If primitive beings could survive so can we. There must be some mechanism by which the earth wards of the effects. Maybe some thing in ionosphere. It kind of difficult to beleive that something which couldnt make anything extinct 250000 years ago will do it now on a species which spends most of its life under radiation shields(read buildings)

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:nope by nick-less · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If primitive beings could survive so can we.

      you mean "we, the people living in industrial countries"?

    2. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well its not like slashdot is quite as popular in the third world.

    3. Re:nope by bjwest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who knows what effect this will have on our electronic dependent society. Computers are so intergrated with our way of life, I doubt we'd all survive just the loss of them.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    4. Re:nope by Jon+Peterson · · Score: 2

      A lot of places in this world don't have computers, and those people survive just fine.

      --
      ----- .sig: file not found
    5. Re:nope by ghostrider_one · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not particularly worried about it, but I really do not want to be here when it happens. The earth's magnetic field (ie the magnetosphere, see here and here) has a vital role in keeping tremendous amounts of radiation (least of all from our own sun) away from the planet. Buildings make pretty lousy radiation shields, the average building wouldn't keep you safe from the radiation from the fallout from a nuclear weapon, let alone the massive amounts of radiation which would pour onto the earth without the magnetosphere. Even without the direct effects of the radiation on life-forms (massive deaths, sterility, mutations etc), it would be pretty tough to survive once the solar wind had stripped the atmosphere away from this rock we sit on.

    6. Re:nope by Shanep · · Score: 2

      A lot of places in this world don't have computers, and those people survive just fine.

      Very true, but did those places gradually move their way of being towards electrified industry to the point of completely relying on it and then... have those mechanisms of survival suddenly stop working?

      I think it would have little effect on most electronics. Perhaps it could even be a positive effect.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    7. Re:nope by Shanep · · Score: 5, Funny

      the average building wouldn't keep you safe from the radiation from the fallout from a nuclear weapon, let alone the massive amounts of radiation which would pour onto the earth without the magnetosphere. Even without the direct effects of the radiation on life-forms (massive deaths, sterility, mutations etc), it would be pretty tough to survive once the solar wind had stripped the atmosphere away from this rock we sit on.

      Wow, what a fun loving, happy go lucky guy you are!

      Do you work for NASA's PR dept? ; )

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    8. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Good. All that will remain will be decent, western civilizations.

      I like this pole disappearance already!

    9. Re:nope by F_Prefect · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just think, it could get rid of the RIAA and the MPAA :)

      --
      You can be replaced by a very small shell script.
    10. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but primitive beings didn't have huge governments (that control food/water/etc) that won't do anything till the last minute. Tax cuts or expensive preparations for something catastrophic 50 or 100 years down the road: which do you think most people will vote for. Almost all politicians will be dead in 50 years so they don't care anyway.

    11. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buildings make pretty lousy radiation shields, the average building wouldn't keep you safe from the radiation from the fallout from a nuclear weapon

      Nuclear weapon fallout is radioactive dust kicked up by detonations near ground level. Whether the building is sealed from outside air is more important in this case than whether the walls are radiation shields.

    12. Re:nope by Shade,+The · · Score: 2

      But it's happened many times before, species have survived (in fact, have -any- species actually died from this?), and the atmosphere is still here. I think it's safe to say it won't be that big a deal, and we've got 1000 or so years to go anyway.

    13. Re:nope by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that our society would be plunged into chaos is such a thing were to happen. Can you imagine the riots etc that might occur?

    14. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tax cuts or expensive preparations for something catastrophic 50 or 100 years down the road"

      Gee, who could that be referring to...

      COUGHrepublicansCOUGHCOUGH!
      aaa...aaaaaa...AAAA AAA...BUSH!!!

      *sniff* sorry, this head cold sucks.

    15. Re:nope by haizi_23 · · Score: 1

      actually, the article said that while the typical pattern is for a reversal to happen every 250k years or
      so, we haven't had one for about a million years. that's longer than modern homo sapiens has been around.
      the last time it happened, it was just homo erectus running around in much smaller densities chopping stuff up w/ sharp rocks. i'd say with the population densities we have now, humans will almost definitely feel the effects.

    16. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But it's happened many times before, species have survived (in fact, have -any- species actually died from this?),


      The last time it happened it did so well before God created the animals and such.

    17. Re:nope by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine the riots etc that might occur?

      Yes... 'The government MUST DO SOMETHING to stop this shift in magnetic polarity!!!!!!!!!! I KNOW IT CAN BE DONE!!! I saw it in that 2002 movie.... The Core!!!!!!'

    18. Re:nope by 5alligator · · Score: 1

      from the article:

      Reversals happen every 250,000 years or so, and as there has not been one for almost a million years, we are due one soon.
      ...or are you one of those creationist ninnies?
    19. Re:nope by mveloso · · Score: 1

      And you base the "no precedent" on what data, exactly?

    20. Re:nope by Alioth · · Score: 2

      Since the pole reversals/absence of magnetic field has occurred many times before without the atmosphere being stripped off by the solar wind, why would the solar wind strip it off this time?

    21. Re:nope by DigitalAdrenaline · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I thought massive doses of radiation would be a good thing. We would dramatically accelerate the speed of mutations throughout the general populace, and thereby evolve at a much faster rate.

      If you're saying that mutations would be detrimental, and would result in a dead populace, perhaps evolution is a fraud.

      God only knows...

    22. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That is of course pure bullshit. solar wind radiation is primarily protons, which have no real hope of hitting the earth's surface (never been actually hit by an aurora have you?). The only significant danger is the showers they can cause in the upper atmosphere, but these showers also cannot reach the earth's surface (don't die from being under an aurora do you?) because if they are high energy gamma rays, the atmosphere is opaque to them, only visible light makes it through. The only real danger is for things flying high, very high. Even these things can be shielded against these sorts of effects. We've sent probes outside of the earth's magnetic field before, you just have to be a little more careful with the design.

      Humans would only have a problem when flying in airliners, and even then probably not. You'd have to fly REALLY high for this to get you. Besides that, even if the radiation did make it to the earth's surface, modern buildings (especially high rises, etc...) are fabulous radiation shields. They don't protect you from fallout because the fallout is actually trace chemicals in the atmosphere, which poison you and make it inside the buildings.

      They will however protect you from any reasonable dose of radiation that is outside the building. Glass will stop pretty much everything except visible light. UV, Infra red, Xrays (kindof), Gamma rays (not really), protons (easily), neutrons (not really, but they don't exist in the solar wind anyway), etc... And Steel Reinforced Concrete is even better, stopping basically anything you could ever bring yourself to care about, the whole photon spectrum, protons, neutrons, alpha, beta, you name it.

      This is for instance why the Neutron bomb doesn't work. The atmosphere is an excellent absorber of neutrons, and modern buildings are even better. All that water added to concrete actually becomes part of the concrete and is excellent at stopping neutrons, as well as basically everything else. Neutron bombs were made to kill tanks (which are made of steel and depleted uranium, so it should work pretty well on them.).

      Please know what you're talking about in the future....

      Tyler Ward
      Physics major at Columbia University
      tjw19@columbia.edu

    23. Re:nope by Yorrike · · Score: 3, Insightful
      We sure as hell weren't living in industrial countires 1 million years ago. I'm sure we'll notice ths, but I doubt there'll be any mass extinction (of course, I am making assumptions here).

      I'm as worried about this as I am about the sun exploding. It's not likely to happen in my life, so I'll leave the problem to the /. crowd of the future to solve.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    24. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like it's time to dust out that fallout shelter in the back yard. But seriously the magnetosphere's collapse will last for anywhere from 2 weeks to 1000 years, we don't really know for sure how long it will take, as the past evidence is not conclusive.
      I'd also like to point out a few other things.
      you don't need walls made out of lead reinforced concrete to protect you. Right now we're being protected by a Relatively weak magnetic field. Any PC monitor has a coil capable of deflecting FAR MORE radiation on a person by person basis that the earth's magnetic field ever could. What's so great about the earth's magnetic field is that it can protect the entire planet, and not just a 5 foot radius.
      As far as boiling off the atmosphere goes, it obviously takes more than a few years for that to happen. I imagine it could take as long a million years without a magnetosphere for that to happen. since the magnetosphere is pole switching, and NOT going away entirely i think we're all safe here. just keep the family jewels in a magnetic jockstrap ;-)

    25. Re:nope by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      [A] Natural selection is the engine of evolution, not mutation (which merely provides raw material for the engine to run on). An increased rate of mutation doesn't cause any evolution at all in a society where we don't let people just die because they're less healthy. For that matter, it doesn't tend to cause evolution at all unless some catastrophe occurs, leading to...

      [B] Significant evolution usually occurs in the aftermath of catastrophe. Killing off the majority of a population is what generally allows new, innovative species to emerge to fill the niches that were occupied by the old species.

      Between these two points, it should be obvious that any event that precipitates evolution is likely to be highly detrimental to us and other existing species. Why this would be a good thing in your opinion, or why you would think evolution is a fraud if not, is not quite clear...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    26. Re:nope by mattsucks · · Score: 1
      Do you work for NASA's PR dept? ; )
      Would that be the department responsible for the moon landing hoax? And are we sure this whole pole-flippage thing isn't just another hoax? One that all the compass manufacturers in the world are in on too? It is all starting to make sense now .... I mean, what IS that stuff in there with the needle ... water? I doubt it .. its obviously some form of brain control serum ...

    27. Re:nope by yaway_rerout · · Score: 1

      The article said one hasn't happened for about a million years, but the earths poplulation has bottle necked since then (approx 600,000 years ago according to the supervolcano special somewhere on cable). If anything is going to kill us it's the repeated inbreading.

      --
      There is no logic, only space. theARTofConfusion
    28. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not keeping up on the latest in evolutionary theory, are you? More and more people are coming around to the viewpoint that the engine of evolution most certianly is mutation (though not purely from radiation, but also "programmed into" the DNA itself in some way). Read Greg Bear's "Darwin's Radio" for an interesting sci-fi take on some of the latest theories.

      Also, significant evolution ahs been observed where no catastrophe has occured. Again, you're not up on your reading. Isolated islands with only one or two species of bird or monkey, have been observed to have dozens of variations that aren't easily explained by pure natural selection given the time-frames.

      Mutation most certainly is a driving engine, in addition to "natural selection".

    29. Re:nope by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      However, recent studies have found that the reversal can happen almost instantly. And this could be very catastrophic.

      By studying cooled lava flows in the Pacific, scientists were able to see many times in history, due to the quick generation of the lava flow layers, that the change can happen in a day or two, not the 1,000 years that was previously estimated by previous studies.

      If it does happen in a day or two, then this could send the modern world back several generations. Many people don't realize how much of our world is dependant upon the existance and testing of magnetic north. It is used in everything from aircraft guidance systems, to satellite stabilization.

      Also don't underestimate its effect on the world, or in areas that have not been studied or considered. How do we know how animals will react, or the mental acuity of humans? Remember that we have magnetically stimulated deposits throughout our body and especially concentrated in our brains. This could cause effects from disorientation to depression in a majority of the populace.

    30. Re:nope by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We sure as hell weren't living in industrial countires 1 million years ago. I'm sure we'll notice ths, but I doubt there'll be any mass extinction (of course, I am making assumptions here).

      That makes extinction more likely, not less. A modern society cannot revert to a pre-industrial state without 90% or more of its population dying in the process... subsistence farming simply can't support a population that grew on mechanized industrial farming. Not only that but most of the people won't have farming skills or tools, and there will be a sizeable minority who decide to just take by force rather than farm, which has a net result of reducing the chances of survival for everyone. Modern medicine and hygiene also means that our immune systems will have lost some of its capability.

      If there is a cataclysm, any human survivors will probably be the natives of the Brazilian rainforests, if there are any left by then. How ironic that they can't survive the encroachment of modern civilization but could survive something that a modern civilization couldn't.

    31. Re:nope by Transcendent · · Score: 2

      you're wrong.... wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong....

    32. Re:nope by Transcendent · · Score: 2

      (why you're wrong)

      it would be pretty tough to survive once the solar wind had stripped the atmosphere away from this rock we sit on.

      Yea... did you know that Venus doesn't have a magnetic field around it? Look how dense it's frekin atmosphere is...

      The earth's magnetic field (ie the magnetosphere, see here [nasa.gov] and here [nasa.gov]) has a vital role in keeping tremendous amounts of radiation (least of all from our own sun) away from the planet.

      Too bad that the magnetosphere only DEFLECTS the radiation to the poles (ever seen northern lights?). It's just a giant vacuum. The same ammount of radiation will hit us... hell... even less since the radiation isn't being sucked in from a hundreds of miles up...

    33. Re:nope by peter · · Score: 2

      > Any PC monitor has a coil capable of deflecting FAR MORE radiation on a person by person basis that the earth's magnetic field ever could.

      I bet those nuts who believe anything bad they hear about any kind of radiation will love to hear that sitting in front of a computer monitor will be safer, radiation-wise, than turning it off. (Err, that doesn't apply to LCDs or plasma screens, only CRT monitors and televisions (and not oscilloscopes, because they use electric instead of magnetic deflection).)

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  13. Wildebeest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In addition, many species of migrating animals and birds - from swallows to wildebeests - rely on innate abilities to track Earth's magnetic field. Their fates are impossible to gauge.

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Could this be the end of the GNU project?!

    1. Re:Wildebeest by bosef1 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, now we'll finally be rid of all those pesky migratory birds and be able to build our microwave beam power satellites in peace.

    2. Re:Wildebeest by naelurec · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have to give Gates credit .. this is really thinking outside the box .. :) Get rid of GNU/Linux? Simple! Switch the earth's magnetic polarity!

    3. Re:Wildebeest by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

      Yikes. So this will change RMS into a right wing ultra conserative and gates will give away Windows for Free.

      --
      Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    4. Re:Wildebeest by digidave · · Score: 2

      I'm sure it'll just cause a delay.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    5. Re:Wildebeest by Mike1024 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey,

      Could this be the end of the GNU project?!

      No, but HURD will definately be delayed.

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    6. Re:Wildebeest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it'll make Kirk Mckusick start dating women :)

  14. What about this Pole Shift? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
  15. ..about time by Archon-X · · Score: 1

    It's been looming for a long time now - we're about 10,000 years over due.

    Scientists study volcanic rocks, and see which way their poles are aligned. Over time, there have been quite a few flips, and stages where there has been no field at all.

    Interesting to see what qill happen to a culture that depends on magnetic polarity..

    1. Re:..about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't depend on magnetic polarity from the polls, even navigation doesn't rely on it

    2. Re:..about time by VortexVertigo · · Score: 1

      I'm also curious as to the practical effects on the environment a pole shift would have. Apparently, life has survived such things before, but how smooth was the ride?

    3. Re:..about time by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting point you raise.
      As you say, evidently life did survive. But if the last switch was 700k+ years ago, I doubt they had such a dependance on technology as we do.

      The sheer scale of repercussions of this are truly staggering... just wait till the media gets hold of it, y2k fever all over again :)

    4. Re:..about time by cruachan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apparently the effects have been looked for in the fossil record, and, perhaps suprisingly, there is absolutly no evidence of any impact whatsoever. There's no discernable increase in speciation (which would suggest no increase in mutation) or extinction rates.

      Presumably 'no magnetic field' recorded in the rocks actually means 'no single stable magnetic field'. Given discussions above about the mechanics of the actual flip I'd have thought it quite likely lots of small chaotic magnetic fields give adequate protection against any major catastophy

    5. Re:..about time by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

      The good old magnetic compass (flanked by the Quartermaster's Balls) is a backup to GPS on ships. Not that you'd get where you want to go smoothly doing compass and celestial navigation. In geek terms, that's like coding in assembly.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    6. Re:..about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree, however, playing devils advocate,
      i've heard it stated that the black plague that
      swept Europe and eliminated a sizable portion
      of the population would be invisible in the
      fossil record. So...perhaps during the shifts
      things significantly sucked at the level of the
      individual, but not enough to make a fossil
      impact. If I had to bet though I'd go with the
      no impact outcome.

    7. Re:..about time by Bluesman · · Score: 0

      Actually, most modern ships, at least in the military, use gyroscopic, not magnetic, compasses as a backup for GPS. Magnetic compasses are much more innaccurate because they are subject to local variations and yearly changes.

      When you're doing celestial navigation, there are interpolation charts to help you figure out the magnetic variation, but it's still a greater margin of error than GPS or the gyro.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    8. Re:..about time by schmink182 · · Score: 1
      If I had to bet though I'd go with the no impact outcome.

      Well so would I. Although I'm fairly sure there will be a huge impact, this side is the only one where I can collect my winnings :)

    9. Re:..about time by SEWilco · · Score: 2
      The "fossil record" is not that detailed. That phrase generally refers to a researcher who looked at a few (three to a few dozen) fossils of a certain era or similar species.

      I am not aware of a database full of detailed fossil information. If there is one, it has data from the past 100 years of fossil studies by a relatively few experts. Back of the envelope... 100 years * 365 days * 1 fossil/day * 50 states * 10 experts/state * 100 countries = 1825 million fossils maximum. That sounds like a lot, but if spread over the 245 million years to the age of the dinosaurs (ignoring all the time before that), it's only 7.4 fossils for each year.

      Now, if you had 7.4 samples of animal and plant life worldwide for each year in the past 10,000 years, how much could you learn about whether species had vanished or flourished? How much of anything could you learn based on one random plant or animal from each continent each year -- even if it was alive rather than a stone shadow of a skeleton? As dogs are much less than one percent of all plants and animals, you can't expect even 100 dogs. Could you know if collies or poodles survived? If one sample was taken from each continent, you would have 10,000 penguins, so you might be able to learn a lot about penguins.

      So it is hard to know how most life was affected during past magnetic changes. Even if everything was crawling around with blisters on their backs and only plants which were in the shade of the dead neighboring trees survived, how much of that might show in the fossil record? Particularly as everything is closely related to what has already survived several magnetic changes every million years. A million years ago there were primates, and there will be primates after this magnetic change -- whether our one species happens to survive or not. We haven't been around long, and are only likely to show in the fossil record because we've become so numerous that a handful of us might get in situations where we get fossilized during each millenium.

      (No, I'm certain there are a lot less than 1825 million fossils which have been studied.)

  16. Ooh, pretty! by JesusPGT · · Score: 1

    Man, with no magnetic field, we'll prolly have some kick-ass looking auroras all over the planet. The boiling atmosphere thing doesn't sound quite as fun though. =/

    1. Re:Ooh, pretty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think we have auroras? Yes, you got it, because of the magnetic field!

    2. Re:Ooh, pretty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Aurorae are triggered by magnetic reconnection that takes place in the tail of the Geo-magnetic field. If the magnetic field weakens, then it should lessen the occurrence of aurorae as well.

      However there is a different kind of weak aurorae present (though it's hard to see it). That is triggered by collision of solar wind particles.
      Now if that would prevail, then the night sky may
      glow faintly in red.

      I'm just speculating though.

  17. Will life survive again? by ensignyu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm wondering: how did life survive the other dozens of other times the pole flipped?

    What can humans do, besides burrowing or mutating?

    Suddenly, global warming (the artificially-induced kind) doesn't seem like that big of a long-term threat.

    1. Re:Will life survive again? by phaze3000 · · Score: 4, Troll
      Suddenly, global warming (the artificially-induced kind) doesn't seem like that big of a long-term threat.

      Except that the magnetic pole shift is likely to happen sometime in the next 1000 years or so. Global warming has the potential to wipe out humans prior to this time.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    2. Re:Will life survive again? by mokeyboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      On global warming - much of the evidence is related to the melting of the polar icecaps. If the magnetic fields at the poles have been decreasing over the last 20 years, how much of the melt is due to more energetic radiation sliding down the field (weaker field, bigger V at the pole and greater cross-section of absorption for the energetic particles to penetrate). From memory, I believe that sat surveys of metropolitan areas have shown a decrease of 0.5 degrees in the same period (ground data is polluted by greater ambient temperature from concrete structures, bitumen etc) and its really the pole data that underpins much of the theory. Its not going to be fun when the poles do drift - we could end up with multiple pole pairs with high latitude magnetic effects in current mid-latitude areas. The auroras will be pretty but the disruption to HF radio is going to mean a much greater need for landline communications.

    3. Re:Will life survive again? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      $Deity, wait until I've had my coffee eh!

      Let's see, charged particles, which are directed towards the poles, penetrate deeper into the weaker field. Energy comes out as heat. Caps melt. Magnetic poles split up. Need fibre-optic cables.

      Brain discharging. Coffee interrupt processing priority.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Will life survive again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Error line 1 " $Deity, wait until I've had my coffee eh!" variable not defined: $Deity

    5. Re:Will life survive again? by lirkbald · · Score: 1
      >I'm wondering: how did life survive the other dozens of other times the pole flipped?

      The article strikes me as very sensationalistic. And your comment seems to be taking it the the wrong way. I'd be inclined to flip it around:

      If life survived all the previous pole reversals, why wouldn't it survive the next one?

      As for migrating animals- I'd imagine it will cause problems. But then again, many migratory animals rely on other cues in addition to the magnetic field (eg, position of the sun in the sky, etc)

      As for radiation, a quick google got me this. So we would probably be in for some impressive northern lights, but no great danger.

    6. Re:Will life survive again? by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, great! Glad i bought that FCKW-free refrigerators lately. Could have saved me some money ;-/ At least i didnt upgrade my car with a katalysator...would have been the next useless investment...

    7. Re:Will life survive again? by Incongruity · · Score: 2
      Its not going to be fun when the poles do drift - we could end up with multiple pole pairs with high latitude magnetic effects in current mid-latitude areas. The auroras will be pretty but the disruption to HF radio is going to mean a much greater need for landline communications.

      Damn it. And I just bought a 802.11b ap and look what happens...it'll be useless! Maybe I'll just use my 3G phone for 'net connectivity...oh. shit.

    8. Re: Will life survive again? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > I'm wondering: how did life survive the other dozens of other times the pole flipped? ...
      > Suddenly, global warming (the artificially-induced kind) doesn't seem like that big of a long-term threat.

      There was a note on this in the latest Scientific American, and it mentions that historically the pole flips have not corresponded with mass extinctions. No big biological problems are expected.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    9. Re:Will life survive again? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2

      Chances are you'll be dead before any of this happens. Heck, your grandchildren will probably be dead before any of this happens. By then, I hope we have something better than 802.11.. ;)

    10. Re:Will life survive again? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1
      "What can humans do, besides burrowing or mutating?"
      Me, I plan on doing both. Mutate first, then burrow. Of course, then I'd end up being pressed into service of Microsoft's evil Mole-Man army, but hey, any port in an ion storm, right?
      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    11. Re:Will life survive again? by iannn · · Score: 1

      die?

    12. Re:Will life survive again? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

      > What can humans do, besides burrowing or mutating?

      Well, if there's a choice, I'm all for mutating!

      I can think of a few schweet 'case mods' I'd like. :)

    13. Re:Will life survive again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? Do you really believe that?

    14. Re:Will life survive again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but 3G still won't be out ;)

  18. would make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone thought that humans have been 'polluting' the earth's magnetic poles with massive magnetically-disturbing installations for a while now? Electro-magnetic pollution from electrical-usage anyone? Why haven't we thought of this before?

    1. Re:would make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the article?

    2. Re:would make sense by haedesch · · Score: 1

      > Why haven't we thought of this before?

      Because that really really reallly doesn't make any sense.
      It's a natural event and it happens every 250.000 years, and we're due for one cause it's been a million years since the last one. Of course you know this all as you READ THE ARTICLE

    3. Re:would make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant that these fields could be influencing the speed of the event

    4. Re:would make sense by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

      Furthermore, human noise would tend to be random and self-cancelling.
      As the article states, this is driven by molten iron in the earth's core. Somehow, I doubt that petty human meanderings have penetrated that deep, much less affected the process.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  19. Down under... not any more! by farfisa69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Australia will become on top of the world and no longer the "arse end of the world". We rule!

    --
    Meat is murder, I eat chicken.
    1. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's hope it improves the taste of your beer.

    2. Re:Down under... not any more! by sg_oneill · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tell it as it is brother! Finally we'll get to condescendingly refer to Europeans and Americans as "down under".

      Oh how I wait for such things.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    3. Re:Down under... not any more! by vstanescu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or may be we will just start to consider the South to be the top of the world, instead of North, so we will keep Europe and North America on top as it is meant to be.. ;-)

    4. Re:Down under... not any more! by inode_buddha · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've always wanted to see my toilet flush in the opposite direction.

      --
      C|N>K
    5. Re:Down under... not any more! by thesadmac · · Score: 0

      I always thought the spinning water thingy was due to the rotation of the earth. Like the coriolis effect or whatever.

    6. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suddenly even the problems caused by the magnetic poles flipping seem much less concerning than the problems that would arise if Earth started spinning in the opposite direction to satisfy your toilet flushing needs!

      I could probably get used to spinning the other way, but I don't know what we'd do in the time that we slowed down, stopped, and then sped up to rotational speed again. It would be an interesting study..

    7. Re:Down under... not any more! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      I always thought the spinning water thingy was due to the rotation of the earth. Like the coriolis effect or whatever.

      Nope, that's an urban myth. There are dozen different things that control how water drains that have a much greater effect than coriolis. To prove the coriolis effect, you'd need to have completely identical drains, including all the drain pipes, and allow the water many days "to settle" in the tank before pulling the plug.

      In the real world, the shape of the sink/tub, the way it flows in the drain, and the motion of the water prior to pulling the plug determine what way it goes. So, Bart was actually right, and not Lisa for once...

    8. Re:Down under... not any more! by legoboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Whether or not you believe it's an urban myth, I satisfied myself that it is true by experimenting at the equator. Effects can be seen at a distance of about two meters to either side... I'll note that I tested this rather extensively myself, using my own materials, as I believed that it was a scam when it was first demonstrated to me.

      Some indian guy slightly north of Quito, Ecuador has what must be a lucrative business demonstrating this and a couple other things including his shrunken head collection (not sure if the heads are part of the standard tour, or were simply shown to me because I was so persistent about the water thing.. Others who had been there had not gotten it).

      --
      If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    9. Re:Down under... not any more! by John+Harrison · · Score: 2

      It is a scam. Extremely slight movements can cause water to swirl either way when near the equator. You just have to know how to do it.

    10. Re:Down under... not any more! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 4, Informative
      Whether or not you believe it's an urban myth

      What I believe is beside the point...a simple google search for "coriolis effect" reveals:

      Quote from usatoday.com:

      Any teacher who stands up in front of a class and says that Coriolis force determines which way the water flows from a sink or bathtub, should not only read Fraser's Bad Coriolis Web page, but be required to copy it on the blackboard 100 times.

      Or, take this much more detailed debunking, containing the following quote:

      This is so large that Coriolis forces will be insignificant compared to other fluid phenomena.

      Don't take my word for it, look it up yourself...I'm just the messenger ;-)

    11. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet I did it?

      --
      legoboy

    12. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun. Odd that I duplicated it, but I suppose we learn something new every day.

    13. Re:Down under... not any more! by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1
      including his shrunken head collection


      Beware! They may have been fake!

      In a seriously shitty reference to an old story...
    14. Re:Down under... not any more! by legoboy · · Score: 1

      True enough. The one 'sealed' and on public display obviously was - it was identical to one I'd seen elsewhere in a museum, and quite frankly I had my doubts about the legitimacy of the one in the museum, too... The museums down there were pretty funny that way. You could tell the legitimate pieces - they had one or more security cameras on them. Some of the more "awe-inspring" to the tour groups milling about did not.

      On the other hand, the guy was rich enough to have managed to acquire a few through wealth if not heredity. This wasn't a large collection by any stretch.. More like 'two', and not in perfect shape.

      --
      If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    15. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that you have to reverse the spinning of the earth, not the magnetic field.

    16. Re:Down under... not any more! by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      So at the equator, the water doesn't swirl at all? :)

    17. Re:Down under... not any more! by Raiford · · Score: 4, Funny
      I made it through the last pole reversal with no problem. I covered myself with lodestones and always slept in an east-west orientation.

      --
      "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
    18. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no you didnt

      try not being high the next time, the effect doesnt work that way

    19. Re:Down under... not any more! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Some indian guy slightly north of Quito ....including his shrunken head collection....were simply shown to me because I was so persistent about the water thing

      Did he also shrink *your* head by chance before showing you the "water thing"?

    20. Re:Down under... not any more! by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 2

      Sorry pal, the direction your toilet flushes is due to earth's rotation, not magnetic poles. To see that change you'll have to make earth spin on the opposite direction.

    21. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, for any given sink you have a 50% chance of having it swirl in the direction you expect.

      Me, I tried this experiment myself. I filled a sink and left it alone for a whole day. When I drained it, there was no swirl whatsoever. OTOH, if I fill it and immediately drain it, it tends to drain clockwise, because the water tends to be moving that way to begin with because the tap isn't exactly centered.

      Finally, my upstairs toilet drains clockwise while my downstairs one drains counterclockwise. To my knowledge, I don't have an equator between the floors...

    22. Re:Down under... not any more! by anethema · · Score: 2, Funny

      OOOH, I see. So the fact that every drain and toilet in the northern hemisphere spiral water the same way was the manufactueres fault, and those weirdos in the southern hemisphere are just designing things backwards.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    23. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sorry pal, but the direction your toilet flushes is due to the shape of your toilet bowl. Only very large weather masses like hurricanes are affected by this. Studies have been done with very accurately cylindrical tubs 2m wide and they ended up draining only about 60% of the time in the expected direction. The idea that water drains one way or another based upon hemisphere as an effect of the earths rotation is purely a myth.

    24. Re:Down under... not any more! by mobosplash · · Score: 2, Informative

      urban legend altert!
      Water's spin direction is not set by coriolis forces. See: http://www.ems.psu.edu/~fraser/Bad/BadCoriolis.htm l

    25. Re:Down under... not any more! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2

      Take a look at the other posts in this sub-thread...

    26. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah... I still need a 'large' hockey helmet.

    27. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duplicated swirl of water. That could have been done by simply unconciously turning as he had done, apparently.

    28. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You post too much. I remember your name from somewhere, and think it was where I trolled you as an AC, but since I can't see your posts older than Nov. 8th, it's hard to find anything. This is why I've got to break this 'Post AC' habit and do it all with my troll accounts...

    29. Re:Down under... not any more! by 2short · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would be a witty rejoinder, except that you are wrong. Go drain the water out of ten different sinks and actually check for yourself.

      I love this urban legend. Everyone believes it without checking, despite the fact that checking would be really easy.

    30. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning! the above is a snopes.com-style false-disproof alert!

      The water spin direction is set by coriolis forces.

    31. Re:Down under... not any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You post too much.

      You added yet-another post just to complain that somebody posts to much???

    32. Re:Down under... not any more! by pipper-noiter · · Score: 1

      yeah, thats what im looking for too! (great simpsons episode BTW)
      Don't forget the jet stream, fast trips from the U.S. to Japan, and from Brazil to India, woo!

  20. Climatic disturbance by stefanvt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The effects could be catastrophic. Powerful radiation bursts, which normally never touch the atmosphere, would heat up its upper layers, triggering climatic disruption.
    Seeing as the climate has been changing rapidly in the last hundred years. Could it also be a result of the declining magnetic field?
    1. Re:Climatic disturbance by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Could be, could be. I remember seeing a plot over time of exceptional weather conditions vs. solar activity, and they showed a strong relationship. A weaker magnetic field would increase this influence even further.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Climatic disturbance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be right, but I'd like to add that the climate has been undergoing change for the previous 1000 years. The sahara as we know it was created, and Greenland became too cold for words. Then there was the mini ice-age, and now things are warming up. It's probably a combination of factors.

    3. Re:Climatic disturbance by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I saw on a video in Astronomy that every 11 years or so sun spots stop appearing on the Sun for a while and every 22 years or so portions of the Earth experience a major drought. They've gone back and compared tree rings from core samples of ancient trees and old records of sunspots for the last few hundred years or so and seen direct correlations.

      And if the magnetic field of the Sun does indeed flip every 11 years as I saw in another post, that could be the cause. My astronomy teacher thinks that the polarity of the planets' magnetic fields is directly influenced by the Sun. Maybe the field on the Earth is directly affected by the flip on the Sun, such that the field gets weaker and weaker until it finally flips itself, then gets stronger to its peak, and finally repeats the process in the other direction.

    4. Re:Climatic disturbance by CanaDyne · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but I'm sure that OPAC and the Big Three auto makers would have you believe that _THIS_ is the sole reason for climate change, and not the three and a half billion tons of oil or 2 billion tons of natural gas we burn every year.

    5. Re:Climatic disturbance by CanaDyne · · Score: 1

      Errr OPEC :)

    6. Re:Climatic disturbance by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Actually i thought that natural gas burned cleanly.

    7. Re:Climatic disturbance by chemmathguy · · Score: 1

      Actually, natural gas does combust "cleaner" than ordinary fuels. However, all this means is that it produces more CO2 and H20 and less of the bad stuff (NO2,unreacted hydrocarbons, etc...). However, natural gas burns more completely than ordinary fuels so a bit less fuel is needed to burn, hence lower levels of CO2 (not anything really drastic though).

    8. Re:Climatic disturbance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It burns cleaner than gas, but it's still pumping greenhouse gases out.

    9. Re:Climatic disturbance by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      2PAC!

      Nevermind...

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    10. Re:Climatic disturbance by stefanvt · · Score: 1
      Perhaps, but I'm sure that OPAC and the Big Three auto makers would have you believe that _THIS_ is the sole reason for climate change, and not the three and a half billion tons of oil or 2 billion tons of natural gas we burn every year.


      I'm thinking more in the line of a combination of factors (hence a result not THE result) one of which being the greenhouse gasses that are put in the atmosphere by everyone/thing on this planet.

      Yes, Including the cow farts
    11. Re:Climatic disturbance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people believe that our health can be affected by magnets by helping us to heal faster.

      More info can be found at http://www.nikken.com/

    12. Re:Climatic disturbance by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Seeing as the climate has been changing rapidly in the last hundred years. Could it also be a result of the declining magnetic field?

      Yes, indeed it could. There is some evidence that the Earth is getting warmer (some parts are warmer, some are colder, some are unchanged), and there is definite evidence of increasing amounts of various chemical compounds in the atmosphere, but the relationship is correlation, not causality. It is just as likely that so-called "global warming" is a result of reducing magnetic field strength or increased solar flare activity.

  21. Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't worry folks, one would imagine that in a few years the technology to take space shuttle up and get Bruce Willis to blow the sun will be available.

    Is it just me or does hollywood have to buy in to every doom prophecy to make a poor action movie about it?

    1. Re:Pfft. by nurightshu · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't worry folks, one would imagine that in a few years the technology to take space shuttle up and get Bruce Willis to blow the sun will be available.

      I imagine that it would be difficult to shield Bruce's lips from the intense heat...(rimshot)

      --
      They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    2. Re:Pfft. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      I imagine that it would be difficult to shield Bruce's lips from the intense heat...(rimshot)

      That's okay, He's expected to die in the operation anyways.

  22. So... by Squareball · · Score: 2

    So are we all going to die from this or not?

    1. Re:So... by Sarin · · Score: 2

      No, only the people who were unfortunately enough to stay on earth.

      oh wait a minute..

    2. Re:So... by dincubus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      more than likely we would get a good suntan. but aside from that.. i am not too nervous about it. what i am more nervous about is the fact that bill gatus of borg setting up and gaining a contract to basically network the new class of aircraft carriers the US navy is building.. doe that make anyone else nervous that a weapons platform is infested with windows 2000 and could possibly be open to a hack attack?

      --
      a wise man once said "two wrongs dont make a right, but three rights do make a left" and that wise man was gallagher
    3. Re:So... by garrickj5 · · Score: 1

      apparently nobody knows how long these events take, it could be over in a few minutes which we would live, or it could take weeks or months which we would be doomed

    4. Re:So... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1
      So are we all going to die from this or not?
      Well, I was thinking we could have a nice big "End of the World" bash in all the major cities around the world. ::looks at the calender::

      Hmm... only about 456,250 more days to go. I better start buying up all the Kool-Aid I can find.
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    5. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... nervous? Considering how I feel about America, that makes me rather pleased. Oh, how I would laugh if the whole naval branch of their imperialist military got immobilized by some 31337 15-year-old Iraqi at just the wrong moment...

      Hah!

    6. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course we are you ninny. Why would you doubt something you read on the Internet.

    7. Re:So... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1
      "So are we all going to die from this or not?"
      That's a very important question, and I think it's very irresponsible of the editors to post a story like this go through without including so much as a "We're all going to die from radiation poisoning" in the summary.

      In fact, they should probably precede every story with a brief explanation of how the story will probably lead to our eventual extinction or enslavement by aliens. As in "Mozilla 1.2 has just been released. Unconfirmed rumors report that it has achieved sentience, and is trying to take control of America's nuclear arsenal."

      Slashdot just hasn't been reactionary enough for my tastes lately.
      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    8. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speak for yourself. Some of us here understand high enegry particle physics, and are currently sitting under a magnetic field capable of deflecting 10 times the radiation the earth's magnetosphere can handle.
      Try to realize, High energy particles bounce off a magnetic field like they're rain hitting glass. that's why the earth's magnetosphere is capable of shielding the entire planet despite not being strong enough to rip a piece of steel out of someone who just had hip surgery.
      your average hospital with a CAT scan already has a big ass shield that when powered up probably puts out a field strong enough to deflect all the high energy particles from the entire building.
      so maybe you'll get extinct, or mutated, but i'm going to have a EM deflector shield strapped to my back (thus providing whole body protection) so i'll be laughing at your mutant children, until they start flying arouns and shooting rays out of their eyes, anyways.

    9. Re:So... by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      I don't think we're doomed if it takes a few weeks or months. I'd be more concerned about it taking a few minutes or worse, a few seconds. First of all, wouldn't a flip of that speed affect the whole planet like a giant EMP (electromagnetic pulse)? Aside from a few hardened pieces of military equipment, this would represent a worldwide destruction of modern technological equipment, wouldn't it? It'd certainly cause a massive disruption of services.

      Even if not, I would think a switch in which we have a little time to prepare (all your compasses are going to be wrong in a couple of weeks -- take appropriate steps) would be far less traumatic for us than one that suddenly occured over a few minutes time...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  23. That's enough by Ed+Avis · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm fed up with these xenophobic jokes about those crazy Poles and how they are always 'about to flip'.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:That's enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      d00d you is teh funny!
      ach, i shoulda kept those mod points i gots yesterday :)

    2. Re:That's enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least it also described the Poles as magnetic.

    3. Re:That's enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like some polar sawsidges?

    4. Re:That's enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm fed up with these xenophobic jokes about those crazy Poles and how they are always 'about to flip'.
      As a matter of fact, I live in Poland and I find your joke offensive. My father has survived holocaust, and people telling such jokes just sicken him. I post it anonymously, because thanks to people like you, I don't want others to know where am I from, if I ever want to get a highly paid IT job. I strongly urge you to think next time, before you post another joke about Poles, Jews or Nigerian slaves who used to live and suffer in your country of liberty and justice. Thank you.
  24. This might fix the ozone layer! by eggstasy · · Score: 2

    I could be wrong but wasnt the ozone layer formed due to cosmic radiation impacting our O2 atoms and combining them into O3?
    This might just fix our ozone hole!

    1. Re:This might fix the ozone layer! by shtarker · · Score: 1

      No the ozone layer is formed due to the UV radiation it protects us against. NO2 emissions from car engines have also been known to make ozone.

    2. Re:This might fix the ozone layer! by benzapp · · Score: 1

      The radiation is not cosmic in origin, but solar. O3 molecules are extremely unstable, and as a result it is their destruction that protects us from solar radiation. The radiation that would typically go into your skin causing the molecular structure of your cells to degrade instead destroys ozone. The reality is that ozone is so unstable it exists for a very short period of time anyway. Yes, ozone is created when other forms of radiation have fun with oxygen, like internal combustion engines. But, beacuse ozone doesn't last very long, people can still live in places like Los Angeles. Sadly, ozone is quite toxic as your red blood cells never really evolved to work with anything but O2.

      The ozone "hole" doesn't really exist year round, it only exists at the poles because our planets orbitol axis is not parallell with the suns, thus the poles receive little energy from the sun at certain times of the year (umm, thats winter) So, with no direct radiation from the sun, ozone is not created and a hole appears. The ozone returns in the summer.

      However, I would hypothesize that because the magnetic field disrupts some radiation from the sun, more radiation would impact with the upper atmosphere resulting in more ozone.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  25. Business model by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Buy 10,000 compasses
    2. Scratch out N, S, E, W
    3. Replace with (in same order) S, N, W, E
    4. Sell on eBay
    5. Profit!!!

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    1. Re:Business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S, N, E, W ?

    2. Re:Business model by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
      Well, you wouldn't change anything then! It would have to be S,N,E,W. If you had a dot.com somewhere in there, you would have been a true dotcom billionaire!

      I mean, you did get modded 4 for this, so, in real life, you would have been rich!

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    3. Re:Business model by oever · · Score: 4, Funny

      I mean, you did get modded 4 for this, so, in real life, you would have been rich!

      Using "n) Profit!" in a post ensures an average mod up of 3.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    4. Re:Business model by BadDoggie · · Score: 5, Funny
      Nothing much. What's SNEW with you?

      <duck>

      woof.

    5. Re:Business model by elvum · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Moderators! Mod parent up!

      ;-)

    6. Re:Business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah same... my planet is apparently about to switch it's magnetic poles...

      you?

    7. Re:Business model by lpontiac · · Score: 2

      Patent it!

    8. Re:Business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "n) Profit!"

    9. Re:Business model by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

      Hell don't you mean sponsor it like M&M sponsored the new Milinium, even if they were a year off.

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    10. Re:Business model by Lonath · · Score: 2

      Even better...get a patent saying that only you can make compasses that point that way. :P

    11. Re:Business model by redtail1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These profit jokes appear on every single story and they stopped being funny long ago.

    12. Re:Business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're supposed to substitute n for a number dumbass. You just screwed up a formula of a one list item and a word.

    13. Re:Business model by Binome · · Score: 0, Redundant

      1) Gripe about running gags and/or in-jokes on /.
      2) ???
      3) Profit

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Beowulf cluster imagines you!
    14. Re:Business model by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      /me grabs snew.com

      Damn, already taken ;).

    15. Re:Business model by Verne · · Score: 0, Redundant

      1) Post profit jokes

      2) ???

      3) Profit!

      --


      There are only two things in this world that smell like fish. And one of them's fish...
    16. Re:Business model by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      2. Scratch out N, S, E, W 3. Replace with (in same order) S, N, W, E

      Naw, just glue a mirror to the side. Quicker. (test shmest)

    17. Re:Business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, rather, he just forgot to italicize his text.

    18. Re:Business model by MyHair · · Score: 2

      Easier yet:

      1. Buy 10,000 compasses
      2. Write up description about how this one-of-a-kind last chance compass will be a collectors item your family will cherish for years to come. Link to New Scientist and Guardian articles.
      3. Sell on eBay, one at a time
      4. Profit!!!

      5: If poles reverse in your lifetime, sell compass conversion kits on eBay.
      6: Profit more!!!

    19. Re:Business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I'm going to:

      (a). Buy up all the LCD monitors I can find.

      OR

      (b). Start an import/export company.

      Why?

      Because CRT's will not work anymore! You'd have to swap your screen for one from the other hemisphere, or use an LCD!

      Now, there's an opportunity to make some (monopoly) money...

    20. Re:Business model by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      These profit jokes appear on every single story and they stopped being funny long ago.

      These are the people who think that quoting Monty Python and the Holy Grail all the time makes them funny, so it should come as no shock.

  26. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and if there is no shift, what then?
    Who are you going to prosecute? God Allmighty? :)

    1. Re:Sure... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2

      " ...and if there is no shift, what then?
      Who are you going to prosecute? God Allmighty? :)"


      I'll lobby your congresscritters of course. Obviously, if my business model isn't working, it HAS to be the fault of those dirty rotten hackers/file traders/terrorists/communists/pick-whatever-group- you-like's.

      With problems like this, legislation should always be the solution.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  27. Get real! by Fyz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First off: we are not all gonna die. It has been 800,000 years since the last time the poles flipped. At that time, our ancestors were walking around, munching on wooly mammoths an giant sloths, etc., armed with such amazing modern tech as sharpened flint and fire. If they can take it, so can we.

    Second, we have very little knowledge about how the poles are going to switch. There seems to be two options:
    1. The poles are going to disappear, then reappear on opposite sides of the planet.
    2. The poles will migrate over the face of the earth until they have effectively flipped over.

    However, as geophysics usually shows us, there is a third, and much more complicated option, that is more likely. Simply put, the poles will weaken, and then split up into smaller magnetic zones, which will then wander all over the surface in an extremely complicated manner, and then coalesce on the oppposite sides. If you think this is a crackpot idea, you should check out past issues of Nature.
    I'll also point out that no one really knows how the planet's magnetic field is generated. It is DEFINATELY not analogous to a regular bar magnet, because the core of the earth is much too hot to sustain magnetization of iron.

    1. Re:Get real! by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In many respects, a simpler culture is far more resilient than a complex one. Increasing the complexity is a bit like walking up a mountain - the safe area to walk on gets smaller the higher you go up. Consider the magnetic flip to be a huge hand reaching down and translocating you a distance horizontally... would you prefer to be higher up the mountain (wheeeeee.....ouch) or farther down ?

      In (slightly) more scientific terms, the advances we've made since those cavemen times are built on the premise of incremental change - we talk of "advances", ie: building on the past to get farther. Take away the foundations (communications is the major one, I guess, direction finding, etc.) and see how well everything that depends on them copes. Consider how an economy might react to (for example: the collapse of air traffic), and the subsequent secondary effects. None of this was even slightly worrying to the caveman, but our world is immensely dependent on excellent long-distance communications.

      Yes, we have a far and away more complex civilisation than a caveman ever dreamed of. This is a weakness, not a strength. The payoff comes from what we can do with that technology, but if you remove that, you end up with a lot of hungry people in a small space...

      I concur with the physics, btw, but you're really overestimating the resilience of our civilisation.

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    2. Re:Get real! by FooBarWidget · · Score: 2

      "It has been 800,000 years since the last time the poles flipped. At that time, our ancestors were walking around, munching on wooly mammoths an giant sloths, etc., armed with such amazing modern tech as sharpened flint and fire. If they can take it, so can we."

      Are you sure? I thought humans were born 200.000 years ago, not 800.000.

    3. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the author contended that humanity would survive, no necessarily that our civilisation would survive along with it.

    4. Re:Get real! by Bas_Wijnen · · Score: 1

      First off: we are not all gonna die.

      No, we're not all going to die. But you don't need much imagination to see that maybe most of us are going to. That's how it works in evolution. You breed a lot, some disaster happens, almost everyone dies, but there are some that survive and they breed on and the story repeats (unless noone survives, which happens to all species at some point)

      The fact that the cavemen survived as a species doesn't mean they were having a nice time when it happened.

    5. Re:Get real! by div_2n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Direction finding is becoming more and more based on GPS than anything. GPS has nothing to do with the magnetic field. It disappearing wouldn't cause it to fail at all.

      The same goes for communications with the exception of possible solar flare interference periodically.

      It seems to me that while the pole disappearing/changing could cause significant change it isn't a showstopper for much of anything except the use of all current compasses and perhaps sunbathing.

    6. Re:Get real! by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      Are you sure? I thought humans were born 200.000 years ago, not 800.000.

      And "civilisation" is only about 30,000 years old. Who said we're 10,000 years overdue? The movie ad, er, article said it's tended to happen every 250,000 or so and hasn't happened for 800,000. Must be new math.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    7. Re:Get real! by Fyz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Of course, this will all be complete speculation, since our civilization has never actually been put to "the test".
      Cavemen were subject to any number of extinction threats that we don't really worry much about in our society. We aren't really worried about regional drought, flooding, forest fires, disease, predators, earthquakes, volcanoes, etc. Maybe worried is not the right word, but we don't face extinction because of these things. Also, the rise of technology has put us in a place where we have a chance of survival in places undreamed of by cavemen.
      It's true what you say about a lot of hungry people in a small space, but in situations like that, a given population will max out at some saturation point where death- and birthrates even out.
      Anyway, I wasn't really talking about our civilization's survival chance, just that "THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END!" is paranoia, since it 's happened about 2000 times since our prehistorical ancestors crawled from the ocean.

    8. Re:Get real! by Fyz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but they weren't born by rocks; Homo Erectus or Homo Habilis were also tool-users, right?

    9. Re:Get real! by Alan_Exs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a pretty interesting point. Forgetting about the magnetic flips for a moment (if we can) what would happen to our society if we took those foundations away? The only people likely to survive (or the majority of them, anyway) would be the farmers - those with enough space and food to live self-sufficiently.

      I've met quite a few of them and the thought that they may be left after the rest of us are weeded has me quaking in my boots. I don't think I'm going to sleep tonight.

    10. Re:Get real! by drew · · Score: 1

      humans split off from the rest of the ape family something like 2 million years ago, so there have been "humans" of one type or another on this planet since then. the current species homo sapiens has populated this planet for a little less than the past (i think) 50,000 or so. (my memory on this second number is a bit fuzzy)

      200,000 years ago i believe would roughly coincide with the appearance of the neanderthals.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    11. Re:Get real! by elvum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Direction finding is becoming more and more based on GPS than anything. GPS has nothing to do with the magnetic field. It disappearing wouldn't cause it to fail at all

      It's the earth's magnetic field that diverts the solar wind away from us. Without it, the GPS satellites would almost certainly be destroyed by the increase in ionising particle flux. Along with all the communications satellites.

    12. Re:Get real! by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I concur with the physics, btw, but you're really overestimating the resilience of our civilisation.

      For the record, I often think it a stretch to describe this mess as a 'civilization' anyway. But to address your point--I think that the problems caused by this occurrance will be alleviated somewhat by it's relatively slow onset. Sure, the poles flipping is a very rapid thing on geologic timescales, but we're still talking decades or more.

      Communications won't collapse--most long-haul lines are based around fibre now, which is essentially impervious to solar radiation. Satellites infrastructure might take a bit of a hit, but I don't see the iminent collapse of the GPS system. (Since the U.S. military really can't do without it, they'll find a way to keep it working. Kind of a hand-waving argument, but you can bet your ass that they'll get whatever appropriations they want from Congress.) Retaining GPS and transoceanic fibre will mean that international finance and trade will be pretty much unaffected.

      Climate change is a different beast altogether. Nobody knows exactly what form it will take, if it happens at all. The world already overproduces food--we just don't distribute it very well. I suspect that we will see exactly what we've seen for most of this century--the developed world will survive in relative comfort, while Third World nations willl starve.

      As to health effects--again, a big question mark. It depends on dose of solar radiation, but I'm heartened by the fact that these flips have happened fairly frequently without being accompanied by mass extinctions. Cancer rates will go up somewhat. Wealthy nations will probably develop preventive medicines to cut down on the effect.

      In short, day to day life probably won't be seriously affected for most people. We'll get some weird weather, and have to develop some interesting technological solutions in some areas, and--oh, yes--low lying cities may have to build dikes or be evacuated. But that's about it. Not the end of civilizaiton.

      Alternately, I advocate giving every person on earth a little bar magnet to carry around, along with detailed instructions as to how it ought to be oriented to maintain an artificial planetary magnetic field.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    13. Re:Get real! by dattaway · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't the magnetic field also responsible for protecting us from cosmic radiation?

    14. Re:Get real! by panurge · · Score: 1

      800 000 years ago? I think not. You're thinking of the mesolithic. You know, when the human race nearly became extinct in the Ice Ages.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    15. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already have a replacement for Earth magnetism.

      It's called GPS.

    16. Re:Get real! by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

      Alternately, I advocate giving every person on earth a little bar magnet to carry around, along with detailed instructions as to how it ought to be oriented to maintain an artificial planetary magnetic field.

      You trust humans with something as important as our magnetic field? Madness I say, madness..

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    17. Re:Get real! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It still doesnt matter GPS navigation is for convience only. anyone needing to do absolute navigation still has several other forms that do not rely on any electronic device and one super accurate navigation system that doesnt care if the poles are north/south or even southwest and northeast. A sextant is a great device that can only be thwarted by stopping the rotation of the planet.

      if anyone thinks that modern civilization will instantly collapse by the loss of GPS.... ther are the same morons that believed that Y2K was something to actually worry about.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    18. Re:Get real! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      "First off: we are not all gonna die."

      I'm pretty sure we are, just not from magnetic pole shifting.

    19. Re:Get real! by Stary · · Score: 2

      Yes of course. And while the farmers are busy growing food and surviving, the rest of the human race will just willingly lay down and die, right?

      --
      Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest
    20. Re:Get real! by dangermouse · · Score: 1
      oh, yes--low lying cities may have to build dikes or be evacuated. But that's about it.

      Hope you're wrong about that. It's not like there are just a few low-lying cities... we've built many of our biggest cities on the coast on purpose.

      You want to pack up New York and move it inland? How 'bout building a dyke around it?

    21. Re:Get real! by cwebster · · Score: 2

      > Consider how an economy might react to (for example: the collapse of air traffic), and the subsequent secondary effects.

      air traffic would *not* collapse due to a magnetic pole change. All that would be required is new charts issued (which are normally issued at regular intervals) with new isogonic lines drawn.

      Charts are already drawn with respect to true north, and a step in flight planning is taking your true course and correcting for the local magnetic variation. It would just be a new number to correct with.

      And as for the VOR airway system in US, the course radials that the stations broadcast tend to be aligned to magnetic north, but some stations are not, and there would be no requirement to immediatly change that if the poles were to change.

      And finally, the magnetic compass in an aircraft plays a specific role, and that is to set the Directional Gyro, which precesses with time and needs to be adjusted. The process is to fly straight and level and unnacelerated (the only time the mag compass is accurate, btw), and read the compass, then consult the compass correction card, and set the DG appropriatly. The compasses already show error due to ferrous materials in the plane construction, and at minimum, you could get by by just making a new compass correction card.

      as a pilot, i dont really see a magnetic pole change as a problem.

    22. Re:Get real! by minion · · Score: 1

      First off: we are not all gonna die. It has been 800,000 years since the last time the poles flipped. At that time, our ancestors were walking around, munching on wooly mammoths an giant sloths, etc., armed with such amazing modern tech as sharpened flint and fire. If they can take it, so can we.

      Perhaps 800,000 years ago we were monkeys.... Now look at us, we just keep gettin' uglier each time the damn poles flip!

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
    23. Re:Get real! by esarjeant · · Score: 1

      While our increasing complexity of machinery will be susceptible to magnetic field shifting, I think our species won't have any trouble surviving.

      The scenario of wandering magnetic fields could adversely affect the normal operation of devices that have a dependency on eletromagnetic intereference. This potentially includes power infrastructure, elecromechanical devices, computers, etc.

      The biggest danger would be the chaos that could follow the inability for our technologies to work. Some groups would more than likely call this the "end" of the world, and the result could be catastrophic --- looting & rioting -- typical TEOTWAWKI paranoia. While biologically we stand a good chance of surviving just about any major global catastrophy as always the real danger is ourselves.

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

    24. Re:Get real! by Proc6 · · Score: 1
      In other news: The planet is about to stop rotating any day now!

      hehe

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    25. Re:Get real! by gvonk · · Score: 2

      It has been 800,000 years since the last time the poles flipped.

      But... but... the earth is only 10,000 years old! How could this have happened 800,000 years ago??!?!?

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    26. Re:Get real! by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      Sure, the poles flipping is a very rapid thing on geologic timescales, but we're still talking decades or more.

      According to this article, at current rates, the Earth's dipole will disappear within just two millennia.

      So I'd say we have a while, yes.

      Cheers,

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    27. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off: we are not all gonna die. It has been 800,000 years since the last time the poles flipped. At that time, our ancestors were walking around, munching on wooly mammoths an giant sloths, etc., armed with such amazing modern tech as sharpened flint and fire. If they can take it, so can we.

      Oh great! We'll survive... but as the Osbournes!

    28. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do you think orientation is calculated with using GPS?

    29. Re:Get real! by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      Yes of course. And while the farmers are busy growing food and surviving, the rest of the human race will just willingly lay down and die, right?

      The rest? No, just most.

      Modern agriculture is very dependant on the rest of us continuing to function. Weather reports, fuel, distribution, fertilizer, ...

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    30. Re:Get real! by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      But... but... the earth is only 10,000 years old! How could this have happened 800,000 years ago??!?!?

      It didn't. God made the Earth look like it had suffered pole switches long long ago to let science know that the magnetic field will switch.

      When belief in an Allmighty, All-knowing being whom is not bound by time is confronted with scientific data that can "disprove" His existence (or lie), there are two logical conclusions, not one.

      1: "He doesn't exist" or "He was wrong."

      2: "He made it this way for a reason."

      Side note: I know God exists, and I know that either the universe is as old as it seems, or God made it that way. I don't care which one is right, as it's tangential to my faith in Him and my faith in human intelligence.

    31. Re:Get real! by gvonk · · Score: 2

      Well, that was SUPPOSED to be a Jack Chick link and it was SUPPOSED to be funny.
      But I'm stupid.

      only 10,000 years old!

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    32. Re:Get real! by djmcmath · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ! GPS is the current standard in navigation. Taking a starshot is crude, at best, and may get you within several miles -- that's assuming you're good at it, have practiced a lot, and get lucky. Moreover, celestial navigation simply isn't an option for an awful lot of seagoing vessels. It may work passably well on tankers and freighters, but imagine a submarine having to surface once a day to take a fix from the stars!

      As to the other forms you mention, there are no other fix methods which work in the middle of the ocean. Near land, some places still have LORAN or OMEGA, but the few places that haven't phased them out already recognize that they do not possess the accuracy to navigate inland waters with.

      You laugh, "hahaha, in inland waters, just navigate by standard piloting procedures! Take visual fixes from the land!" Easy to say for a port like Port Canaveral, or Norfolk, Virginia -- visibility is typically pretty good (though Norfolk often suffers from an afternoon fogbank that always mystified me, and P-Can suffers from haze that often obscures usable navigation aids). Try driving into the Puget Sound in 500ft visibility without GPS, however. You can't see the front of your ship, let alone the land. Other ships are totally invisible to you in the dense fog, and you won't know you're in trouble until your ship stops when you hit the shore. Were you planning on taking a celestial fix? Go ahead, you can't even see the stars, let alone do the necessary calculations in enough time to have a meaningful fix.

      Please, enlighten me as to these "other" wonderful means which work so well, and are so adaptable to the circumstances.

    33. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Navigating in fog is bad, but not quite as bad as you describe. There's this thing called "radar".

      I mostly agree though. Losing both GPS and compass navigation would seriously screw things up.

    34. Re:Get real! by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      you obviousally never had to navigate before... Navigation by means that do not use sattelites is very simple and very accurate.. Dead Reconing, something that a famous man back in the early 1900's used to cross the atlantic in his own aircraft worked great, to the point that he was only 2 miles off hos mark and then easily used (Gasp, get ready for it) his EYES to locate and navigate to the landing location. I know, this strange idea of using EYES and navigators with IQ's over 60 is a radical idea... but it works.. A sextant can be very accurate (within 2-3 miles) if the person using it is again, smart and trained.) and the United states government used a form of a sextant that was computer controlled to give better than GPS accuracy navigation to the SR-71 spy plane. Finally if I take advantage of the current state of common technology, if the GPS constellation were to stop working, and the poles ceased to exist.. I can easily navigate by the radio signals found in the 88 to 108 MHZ band. using one of two methods... RDF or radio direction finding... or something else that was radical.... LORAN.

      Again.... GPS is purely a convience item... only a few things will change if it went away.... Kind of like how the world was in 1980 before anyone but the military used GPS. and finally we can always use that silly navigation system used by our space explorers... they dont have a solar-system wide GPS setup, nor do they have a magnetic fix. Gyros are your friend here..

      finally, your statemnt about Puget Sound... if any captians are navigating by GPS in near zero visual conditions they need to be shot by a firing squad.. Navigation by sound can be accomplished, in fact this is WHY they use fog horns... it's not for the entertainment of the locals or tourists.. and finally in a harbor.. we can always use that silly thing called RADAR for navigation... which is what they use in the conditions you speak of as well as the sound cues from the various fog-horns on bouys and points.

      GPS = navigation for the uneducated and lazy... and please remember that GPS is a very very new item... captians and others have navigated without it for millions of years... removal of the magnetic constant is only an inconvience today.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    35. Re:Get real! by po8 · · Score: 2

      Back in the pre-GPS days (remember those?), the LORAN salesman in our little coastal town used to do the blindfold demo: Pilot a boat from about 2 miles out across the bar and right up to the docks using nothing but LORAN. Today, LORAN units would be even simpler and more accurate, as they would contain fancy computerized calculations and built-in maps.

      If the GPS satellites weren't already up anyhow for military reasons, it would have been much cheaper to improve the LORAN system than switch to GPS. The range was several hundred miles, and could likely be improved with better gear and more stations (e.g. automated ocean-going stations).

      IMHO, if the magnetic poles leave/move, accurate navigation is likely to be the least of our worries...

    36. Re:Get real! by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Communications won't collapse--most long-haul lines are based around fibre now, which is essentially impervious to solar radiation."

      It does not matter that the information itself is carried on light inside of fibers of glass. The signals inside the fiber can only travel ~100Km at the most before they need to be boosted again by an amplifier. This is done by doping a small section of the fiber with Erbium atoms and esentially making it lase(stimulated emission) by irradiating it with intense light from semiconductor lasers. There are common CONDUCTIVE cables cladding the main fiber line in a fiber optic cable that supply the amplifiers that are spread out all along the line with power to run. What happenes when huge lengths of conductive cable are immersed in a (potentially quickly) changing magnetic field? Thats right, gigantic currents are set up in the cable and can destroy any sensitive devices connected to it. Thereby rendering the fiber dark.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    37. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what the guy is maybe saying is that people will raid the farms stealing all the food and rape the farmers daughter. Then they would probably burn the crops, smash up the farming equiptment and move on to the next farm.

      People will not just lay down and die while farmers have all the food they need. People will kill the farmers and take their food.

    38. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, I have navigated by dead reckoning many a time, and just about everyone who does so these days uses as the basic tool... you guessed it... a compass.

      Sure a sextant would help you plot a fix now and then, but it doesn't work too well when there are (for example) clouds in the sky and you've got nothing to fix on. Which happens from time to time, you know.

      I guess during such times one would have to get a bearing from a distant radio signal or something, which doesn't sound like it would be all that accurate. I suppose we could get by, but not as easily as you seem to think.

      Of course it's all hypothetical. If GPS were in danger of going down, they'd build something to replace it.

    39. Re:Get real! by Christianfreak · · Score: 2

      Consider how an economy might react to (for example: the collapse of air traffic)

      Fortunatly you are wrong. There will be no collapse of air traffic because airplanes are largely guided by other means these days.

      Even if radiation knocked out every communications device on earth the sun will still rise in the east and set in the west. And the stars will still stay in their predictiable patterns.

    40. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is how do you use a sextant to navigate in an airplane at 35000 feet.

    41. Re:Get real! by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I thought the GPS satellites are in geosynchronous orbit, and therefore well out of the range of any protection the magnetic field gives us?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    42. Re:Get real! by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      Besides, LORAN stations have super-cool strobes on their four antennas. In a fog, those strobes double their coolness.

      -Paul Komarek

    43. Re:Get real! by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      oh! oh! Conspiracy theory! I think I can mix this all in with the egyptians and atlantis and and the aztecs! Yeah, and aliens too! Because you know they helped them. Probably helped us too. Yeah and black helicopters will fall from the sky and we'll all die because of the magnetic poles just like everyone else. DOOOOOM!!!!

    44. Re:Get real! by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      The B-52 is also equipped with a sextant and other astral navigation gear. Part of the reason is survivability during a nuclear war.

      -Paul

    45. Re:Get real! by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

      They are actually in 12 hour orbits roughly between 12,000 to 13,000 s. mi. You're right in that they are well out of the protection of earth's magnetic field, but they are a long way from geosynchronous orbits.

    46. Re:Get real! by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Insightful
      A sextant is a great device that can only be thwarted by stopping the rotation of the planet.

      Or cloud cover...

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    47. Re:Get real! by scharkalvin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The atmosphere provides most of our protection from cosmic rays. The magnetic field does NOT protect at all over the poles which may explain the ozone holes the pop up from time to time. Yet there is little more cosmic radiation on the ground over the poles then anywhere else.

    48. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell of a lot easier for an SR-71 at FL810 to see the stars in bad weather than it is for me down here at FL000.

    49. Re:Get real! by aminorex · · Score: 2

      Whether or not we are *all* going to die, I
      couldn't care less. What is of interest to me
      is whether *I* am going to die.

      While it is certain that our ancestors who
      reproduced *after* the last such event did
      survive it, the ancestors of all the people who
      weren't born because their freaking ancestors
      were all dead first would like to challenge you
      to an ectoplasm-wrasslin' contest to see who
      gets to incarnate after the next event.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    50. Re:Get real! by bellings · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First off: we are not all gonna die.

      I'm pretty sure we are

      I won't

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    51. Re:Get real! by aminorex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > "THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END!" is paranoia

      When you die, this world ends. Get real.
      Denying your own immanent death is a far less
      survivable delusion than the paranoia with which
      you smear your rhetorical opponents.

      Now in fact people live in the arctic where
      the field lines converge, so the notion that
      a collapse of the magnetic field would not
      be survivable is prima facie absurd, but that
      doesn't mean that *you* won't get killed by a
      cyclone that results from ionospheric overheating.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    52. Re:Get real! by marshac · · Score: 1

      I remember reading about how this [nasa.gov] was being considered not simply for propulsion, but for protecting a crew from solar radiation. I wonder if this technology could be built into satellites?

      And as for aircraft navigation, we also used LORAN.

    53. Re:Get real! by smilinggoat · · Score: 1

      It has been 800,000 years since the last time the poles flipped. At that time, our ancestors were walking around, munching on wooly mammoths an giant sloths, etc., armed with such amazing modern tech as sharpened flint and fire. If they can take it, so can we.

      What I am worried that our culture has become too technologically dependent to survive without complex technology which may fail in the event of such a magnetic flip. I believe we are currently exceeding the earth's carrying capacity for our species and it is only through technology that we are still surviving. Without the use of GPS tractors and global communications how are we to get food to those who need it most? Even if there is not some catastrophe, I believe our way of life will have to dramatically change.

      The cavemen didn't have much to lose, so they didn't lose it. We have much that could go awry. I could be comparing apples and oranges, but NASA avoids using extremely intricate technology (i.e. CPU's with 0.13 micron transistors, etc) because those devices may fail when bombarded with cosmic rays. Might these devices fall prey to harm without a global magnetic shield?

    54. Re:Get real! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Simply put, the poles will weaken, and then split up into smaller magnetic zones, which will then wander all over the surface in an extremely complicated manner

      Bad side: Some Cub-Scouts will get really really lost.

      Good side: I don't have to manually degauss my monitor anymore.

    55. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, even with the planet stopped a sextant is still fine for determining your latitude.

      Interestingly enough, while determining longitude with a sextant has always been a bit tricky, it becomes a snap if you stop the the planet from spinning.

    56. Re:Get real! by Hodr · · Score: 1

      "I'll also point out that no one really knows how the planet's magnetic field is generated"

      --

      Yeah, sure buddy. I took introductory physics in elementary like everyone else. Magnetic forces are created either from electric current, or molecules alignment. As you pointed out, in the molten core of the earth there can be no alignment of the molecules.

      Therefore the magnetic poles must be caused by an electric current. This current is plainly evident in every body of water as it approaches the ocean, and as you can see from the US map, land masses are always between oceans, so the current flows left or right along the equator. The magnetic field, being Normal to the direction of flow will then either be directly up, or down from the equator. Thus the strength of each individual pole is determined by the amount of flow in either direction.

      Therefore, the weakening of earths magnetic field can be attributed to less rain, global warming, industrialization (dams / redirection of naturally forming waterways), and the french.

    57. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      How come no one pointed out the obvious? New movie comming out next year depicting similar situation = hack internet reporter writing about impending doom.

    58. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tomorrow is within just two millennia...

    59. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What is of interest to me is whether *I* am going to die.

      Hate to break it to you but yes, you are going to die.

    60. Re:Get real! by benzapp · · Score: 1

      This is absolutely true. As the early european explorers found, compasses are great when you are sailing within site of land, but a sextant is far more important than a compass when travelling the open sea. The poles may change, but the stars won't. I have the strange idea in my head that modern US naval vessels have devices which position the ship by observing the stars. This is something of a redundancy in the event a GPS signal is blocked, or the satellites themselves are compromised.

      Lets not forget the north star.

      Compasses are highly useful, but there are many alternatives, especially with modern technology.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    61. Re:Get real! by benzapp · · Score: 1

      You would only have to build a dike up to perhaps 125th street. Washington Heights is far higher up than most people realize (something like 750 feet above sea level at the highest level). Go to the Cloisters someday, or drive over the George Washington Bridge during rush hour so you can see some distance...

      I would estimate that you would only have to damn up about 18-20 square miles of the island, which wouldn't really be that difficult. Of course, by then Manhattan will be a solid fortress for the wealthy. Maybe they will damn the Bronx so their servants have someplace to live. Fuck the other boroughs.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    62. Re:Get real! by Fyz · · Score: 1

      They have a saying in infantry units: "No matter how much fancy GPS's and complicated weaponry a soldier has, it's still the human infantryman, not the technology, who has to suck it up and get moving"
      Our way of life is going down the tubes everyday. It's called progression of history. Just because I sit in front of my computer everyday does not mean I couldn't suck it up and insure my survival.
      And yes; a lot of people will probably suffer or even die if this "cataclysm" hits, but first off, that's not looking at the big picture, the human race. Second, we will have hundred of years to adapt or die trying.

    63. Re:Get real! by deblau · · Score: 2
      if anyone thinks that modern civilization will instantly collapse by the loss of GPS.... ther are the same morons that believed that Y2K was something to actually worry about.

      I absolutely LOVE revisionist history. Y2K was stopped by being prepared. If we hadn't spent many thousands of man-years fixing the problem, you'd be singing a different tune, Jack.

      It still doesnt matter GPS navigation is for convience only. anyone needing to do absolute navigation still has several other forms that do not rely on any electronic device and one super accurate navigation system that doesnt care if the poles are north/south or even southwest and northeast. A sextant is a great device that can only be thwarted by stopping the rotation of the planet.

      Ever see a bird or a wildebeest use a sextant? No? Then have you ever seen an ecosystem without birds or wildebeests?

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    64. Re:Get real! by Alan_Exs · · Score: 1

      I'm only speaking for myself here but every farmer I have met has been far more heavily armed than me. Why wait for the inevitable, though? I say we amush them NOW while they are still to complacent to organise a decent defence.

    65. Re:Get real! by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      The article predicts this within the next 1000 years. You seriously think that within even the next hundred years we won't have improved our technology to the point of making this sort of change moot or at least a minor speed bump?

      Nanotech, genetic engineering, holographic computing, etc are all technologies already making changes to our world. I think we can handle some changes to the magnetic poles and some radiation. We're nearing the peak of the mountain and discovering we have grown wings.

      Now on a short-term scale.. if this happened in the next 10 years.. I'd probably agree with what you say. I just think we're at the point where our technology will cross a barrier that changes these risks.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    66. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I absolutely LOVE revisionist history. Y2K was stopped by being prepared. If we hadn't spent many thousands of man-years fixing the problem, you'd be singing a different tune, Jack.

      I had several test servers and systems that were intentionally never made Y2K compliant... just like 90% of the computers and systems in China and Russia..

      Guess what... they didn't explode, implode, start killing people randomly and the other things that were predicted... in fact the problems alerted in the software didn't even happen or cause the problems the software companies predicted. Y2K was a non event not because of the preparedness or special changed made.... Y2K was a non-event because it really wasn't that serious.

      Stop stroking yourself just because you were a Y2K expert... those of us with an IQ over 100 knew you guys were worse than amway salesmen.... selling fear and crap to bilk the stupid out of money..

      There are still systems that are not Y2K compliant that run fine, do nothing evil... and will STAY y2k NON compliant.

    67. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, I've seen several ecosystems with no wildebeest. Actually, I'm living in one RIGHT NOW.

      That comment was almost as dumb as those who think the sextant is "an alternative" to using a compass.

    68. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Y2K was a non-event because people took the time and resources to check what would and wouldn't freak out. Granted it often times wasn't as bad as people were anticipating but there was most definitely a real threat!

      It's also worth noting that many Y2K "fixes" were actually last minute kludges just to make the rollover go smoothly. If people hadn't starting pushing a lot of these corporations towards the end, then those kludges wouldn't have been completed in time to prevent potentially massive financial losses.

      So please -- don't assume just because people made outrageous claims that it wasn't a real threat.

    69. Re:Get real! by Mr.+Asdf · · Score: 1

      It has been 800,000 years since the last time the poles flipped. At that time, our ancestors were walking around, munching on wooly mammoths an giant sloths, etc., armed with such amazing modern tech as sharpened flint and fire. If they can take it, so can we.

      but everyone knows that the earth is really less than 6,000 years old, and that it was created to look like we've had magnetic shifts already, but we really haven't experienced it yet- so you cannot be so sure we'll survive. in fact, it just might be the ending we've been waiting for..... best to double your sunday offering, just in case.

    70. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no.. stopping the rotation of the planet is the ONLY way.. ;P

    71. Re:Get real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      |First off: we are not all gonna die.

      I'm pretty sure we are

      I won't

      will too!

  28. The HAB Theory by boustrophedon · · Score: 1, Interesting
    This prediction mirrors the plot of Allan W. Eckert's novel, The HAB Theory . In his amazon.com customer review, Samson Moy from Hong Kong nicely summarizes the HAB theory:
    In a nutshell, the HAB Theory presented the fact that because of the eccentricity of the North and South Poles to the magnetic poles, it created an imbalance in the rotation of the earth. When this imbalance reached a stage where it overcame the gyroscopic effect of the earth's rotation, the earth would see a near 90 degree shift of its axis of rotation. The result of which would mean that the poles ended up in the equator and the result would be catastrophic to any life form. This phenomenon occured once every 3000 to 7000 years in the past. The last roll over occurred more than 7000 years ago.

    When the poles shift in the novel, the best chance for survival is at the pivot points--locations halfway between the old and new poles.

    1. Re:The HAB Theory by SQL+Error · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's just dumb.

      The Earth's magnetic field is well known to wander about. Apart from the fact that Magnetic North is currently moving at a measurable speed, lines of aligned particles of iron in rock strata show a clear history of magnetic pole reversals.

      The Earth's axis of rotation, on the other hand, is about as fixed as anything can be. The angular momentum of the rotating Earth is huge; you'd need an equally huge external force to shift it. The Earth's magnetic field is puny in comparison, and can't affect rotation in this way.

      Apart from the fact this this "theory" contravenes the laws of Physics, there is no geological evidence to support this (frozen mammoths don't count!) and huge amounts of evidence to counter it. All the recent ice ages occured in the (current) north and south latitudes, for example. There are no signs of the sea inundating the land for thousands of miles, which is what would ensue in such a disaster. Plus, there are fragile stalactites that have formed over many thousands of years, and which would shatter if something this dramatic had ever happened - but which are perfectly intact.

    2. Re:The HAB Theory by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      The Earth's axis of rotation, on the other hand, is about as fixed as anything can be.

      According to a somewhat cheesy TV documentary that I recently saw, we can thank our large moon the stability of our rotational axis.

      Currently, the axis wobbles by at most 1 degree. They claimed that without the moon to stabilize things, over time it would wobble up to almost 90 degrees. Such an extreme angle and the associated seasonal changes would probably eliminate the possibility that advanced life would evolve on this planet.

    3. Re:The HAB Theory by SQL+Error · · Score: 2

      This is true, but that's different to what the "HAB Theory" claims. The Earth's inclination, that is, the angle between its axis of rotation and the plane of its orbit around the Sun, does wobble, and the moon plays at least some part in stabilising it. The wobble is pretty slow, though.

      What the "HAB Theory" claims - and what is absurd - is that the axis of rotation shifts by 45 degrees every few thousand years, so that the North Pole suddenly pops up in (for example) Madrid, and the South Pole in Christchurch, New Zealand. You'd think someone would have noticed that sort of thing :|

    4. Re:The HAB Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reread the book, please. The premise is that the *rotational* axis shifts 75-85 degrees. This means the rotational N/S poles, not the magnetic poles. They just go along for the ride. The eccentricity derived primarily from mass imbalance of the continents. The book itself is moderately interesting, the science no worse than many SF-for-normal-people books, and the sub-story about ossification in academic science was right-on.

      BTW, the Earth *does* exhibit Draysonianism. Go look it up.

      Happy Sunday,
      Thumper

    5. Re:The HAB Theory by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Actually the Earth's axis of rotation does wobble quite a bit, if not by huge amounts. It certainly does so in a measurable way.

      The Moon helps stabilize the axis of rotation. If we didn't have the Moon, the Earth could have ended up like Uranus is now: with an axis of rotation almost parallel to the plane of orbit. Seasons would have a different meaning in this context...

  29. Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pumping shit into the atmosphere for something like 150 years now has had nothing to do with it?

    1. Re:Umm by Blackneto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      150 years vs millions?
      Volcanic activity has fucked with the atmosphere of the planet more than man ever will.
      Add into that shit falling from space plus other natural phenomena and it makes our little bump in the road of existence pretty meaningless.

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
    2. Re:Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Volcanoes release huge amounts aerosols, but do not release large amounts of long-term, climate-altering gases. Nor does the shit falling from space. Though the vastness of the planet is humbling, the amount of CO2 released by human activity actually IS substantial, even on a planetary scale. (CO2 is a trace gas, so it is easier to meaningfully alter its concentration in the atmosphere than to do so for, say, nitrogen.) While global temperatures bounce around, CO2 levels are sweeping up in a near-perfect curve. One can argue whether humans are altering the climate, but there's no question we're increasing CO2 levels markedly.

    3. Re:Umm by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      are you on crack? the crap from space is radiation energy. it hits the earth in vast amounts 24 hours a day. that is very significant.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Umm by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      Volcanoes release huge amounts aerosols, but do not release large amounts of long-term, climate-altering gases. Nor does the shit falling from space. Though the vastness of the planet is humbling, the amount of CO2 released by human activity actually IS substantial, even on a planetary scale. (CO2 is a trace gas, so it is easier to meaningfully alter its concentration in the atmosphere than to do so for, say, nitrogen.) While global temperatures bounce around, CO2 levels are sweeping up in a near-perfect curve. One can argue whether humans are altering the climate, but there's no question we're increasing CO2 levels markedly.

      Tropical forest fires release incredible amounts of CO2. 40% of the CO2 emmissions into the atmosphere in 1997 came from wildfires in Indonesia. Until recently, no one had even considered forest fires as a possible source of atmospheric CO2 increase. How many other things are there we haven't considered? I'm not saying we don't contribute to atmospheric CO2; we just aren't going to solve the problem by buying hybrid cars and windmills. The assumption that humans are the cause of CO2 increase seems to me very arrogant.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40% of the CO2 emmissions into the atmosphere in 1997 came from wildfires in Indonesia [ens-news.com]. Until recently, no one had even considered forest fires as a possible source of atmospheric CO2 increase.

      But the fires would not have started if the climate was not F'd up enough to produce the huge drought that dried the plants.

    6. Re:Umm by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      But the fires would not have started if the climate was not F'd up enough to produce the huge drought that dried the plants.

      Incorrect. The drought was precipitated by an el nino condition, which is a naturally occuring phenomenon. Your example is, however, a fine illustration of the simplistic worldview many environmentalists have.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    7. Re:Umm by MobiusKlein · · Score: 1

      I heard this news, and they mentioned that it was due to the peat forests drying out due to timber harvest combined with a drought.

      The forest canopy generally kept the 30+ foot layer of peat (very young coal.) from drying out, and burning. From the article you mention,

      "But when forest clearing, drainage and drought begin to dry out these peatlands, they become susceptible to fire - as was demonstrated during the 1997 El Niño driven dry season. "

      and
      "But the problem did not end with the easing of the dry El Niño weather pattern. Wildfires, mostly sparked by humans clearing forest for agriculture, and exacerbated by increased logging in the years following the fires, caused major problems again in 2000, and problems may be cropping up again this year. "

      It's a massive HUMAN-TRIGGERED contribution to global warming. Read more carefully.

      rbb

    8. Re:Umm by MobiusKlein · · Score: 1

      Edit - contribution to CO2 emissions, which might lead to global warming. We'll know for sure when the Beta period is over for Earth 0.9

      rbb

  30. ZetaTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crackpot, yes, but where do they get those ideas... ZetaTalk.

    1. Re:ZetaTalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZetaTalk as in ?

      Entertaining, but still crackpottery.

  31. OK, so we're all doomed by forged · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then screw global warming. I'm buying that SUV :->

    1. Re:OK, so we're all doomed by TrevorB · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then screw global warming. I'm buying that SUV

      Yea, it will be the only thing powerful enough to carry all the lead shielding...

    2. Re:OK, so we're all doomed by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Then screw global warming. I'm buying that SUV

      Hopefully after the reversal, the new mag field will be so strong that all SUV's zing away toward the poles.

    3. Re:OK, so we're all doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically with floods and other road-busting weather, SUV's are the best vehicle to deal with the very problems they create.

      It is like McCaffe making its own viruses.

    4. Re:OK, so we're all doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      again, how many times do i have to repeat this... the magnetic coil in the back of a PC monitor is capabble of deflecting way more radiation (in a 5 foot radius) than the earth's magnetosphere currently provides for the whole planet.
      the solution is simple, put an electromagnet on the roof of your car that generates a field of sufficient power. for a few pounds of weight you can get an effective shield equivalent to a few MILES of lead shielding. Why? it's magnatudes easier to deflect high energy particles than to stop them entirely.
      Raise those deflector shields... Maybe the ISS should practice putting up an EM deflector shield for practice, since we could all be needing them pretty soon.

  32. Rubbish by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... Dr Paul Murdin, of the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge. 'On Mars, when its magnetic field failed permanently billions of years ago, it led to its atmosphere being boiled off.'

    Whoa .. steady on there Dr.Murdin! That's quite a brave thing to say as if it's a fact. That's just on theory, and an interesting one to, but you cannot prove this yet. I'm sure there are lots of other reasons why Mars atmosphere is the way it is now.

    'On Earth, it will heat up the upper atmosphere and send ripples round the world with enormous, unpredictable effects on the climate.'

    Arh! I think it will make some lovely daytime aurora, and generally play havoc with electrical equipment.

    Mars is exposed to this kind of solar radiation, but it's atmosphere stays fairly chilly! The only solar radiation that seems to affect its temperature is the infra-red kind.

    I'm willing to bet this article is nothing more than pre-hype for the movie The Core.

    1. Re:Rubbish by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      "Dr Paul Murdin, of the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge. 'On Mars, when its magnetic field failed permanently billions of years ago, it led to its atmosphere being boiled off."

      Whoa .. steady on there Dr.Murdin! That's quite a brave thing to say as if it's a fact. That's just on theory, and an interesting one to, but you cannot prove this yet. I'm sure there are lots of other reasons why Mars atmosphere is the way it is now.

      If I understand correcty, the accepted one is that Mars's gravity well is too shallow to hold on to an atmosphere of anything lighter than carbon dioxide over geologic time (which among other things means that any terraforming won't be permanent, and that we aren't likely to find *much* water underground).

      Arh! I think it will make some lovely daytime aurora, and generally play havoc with electrical equipment.

      And greatly increase the mutation rate (solar wind smacking into the atmosphere will produce a fair bit of secondary radiation (X-rays)). While this won't do much beyond raising the cancer rate in any given generation, it will mean that a lot of genetic defects will start piling up over the years.

      Not that I'm worried. By the time the field weakens enough for this to be an issue, we'll have enough medical expertise to rewrite our genomes as we see fit, so repairing damage won't be a problem. If we don't just put an artificially generated field in place to protect our electronics first (this is feasible, barely).

    2. Re:Rubbish by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Informative

      If I understand correcty, the accepted one is that Mars's gravity well is too shallow to hold on to an atmosphere of anything lighter than carbon dioxide over geologic time (which among other things means that any terraforming won't be permanent, and that we aren't likely to find *much* water underground).

      I used to think this to, but Titan has even less gravity than Mars yet keeps an atmosphere that is about 50% thicker than Earths.

    3. Re:Rubbish by drew · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing with you, but what gases make up titan's atmosphere? that does make a difference.... (hence the "lighter than co2" qualification).
      also, although i am no expert on the matter, i would think the proximity and relative size of mars two moons would reduce its effective gravitational pull on its atmosphere...

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    4. Re:Rubbish by vandemar · · Score: 2
      And greatly increase the mutation rate. While this won't do much beyond raising the cancer rate in any given generation, it will mean that a lot of genetic defects will start piling up over the years.

      I'm no expert in this field, but it got me thinking. Recent hypotheses in evolutionary theory (such as Punctuated Equilibrium) suggest that evolution takes place in sporadic bursts rather than a slow and steady flow. Seeing that the magnetic poles flip every so often, and these flips could be accompanied by widespread genetic mutation, it seems likely that this would account for the evolutionary phenomenon mentioned above.

      Can anyone verify the plausibility of this? Perhaps the next evolutionary step for humanity may not be far away. Or how about this scenario:

      The people of the first world countries are relatively safe from the mutating effects of radiation due to the accessibility shelters, medical treatment, portable shielding, etc. The masses of the third world countries become subject to geneteic mutation. Most of it is harmful, and even fatal, but a small minority develop advantageous traits, including perhaps immunity to the bad effects of radiation. With the excess population gone, the homo-superiors (a term from X-men) from the third world become a force to be reckoned with. The first world responds with increased R&D in genetic engineering, creating their own breed of superhumans.

      [joke]Just in time to ward off the Krull invasion.[/joke]

    5. Re:Rubbish by Kupek · · Score: 1

      Read The Blind Watchmaker by Richard Dawkins. He talks about punctuationism, and explains why it's really not very different from the "standard" view of evolution.

      And then read the rest, because it is an excellent book.

    6. Re:Rubbish by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      This is mostly due to the Gas Torus effect. (See Larry Niven's Smoke Ring novels for an SF version.) Basically, Titan is in a relatively close orbit around a really big planet. When some of Titan's atmosphere leaves, which happens all the time, it doesn't get blown into interstellar space like Mars's atmosphere would. It just goes into orbit around Saturn, and most of it ends up coming back to Titan. You end up with a moon with a thick atmosphere embedded in a ring of much thinner atmosphere.

      A better example to bring up would be Earth's atmosphere versus Venus's. A planet that's a bit smaller and has an atmosphere a heck of a lot thicker. And no, I can't explain that one.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  33. Arrrgg... More Radiation.... by qwijibrumm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Insert joke about tinfoil hat here

    --
    I wish there was some there was some way that I could be outside playing basketball, in the rain, and not get wet.
    1. Re:Arrrgg... More Radiation.... by shrikel · · Score: 2

      Wow. Slashdot never ceases to amaze me. qwijibrumm just got a "Score:5, Funny" for being too lazy to actually make up a joke. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
  34. Supposedly... by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 4, Funny

    According to Sightings, it was to happen immediately due to something with planetary alignments -- though I know the last one was May 5, 2000 -- or some other cosmic phenomenon which would immediately accelerate the polar flip drastically.

    I really miss that show, though they still play re-runs. I used to sit in front of the TV with a tinfoil hat on.

  35. Highly suspicious by hugesmile · · Score: 1

    Seems like pre-press releases are the way to hype new movies these days! Hollywood has it all figured out. Create some plot that involves something far-fetched but science based.

    Then have a few "scientists" release articles that talk about the phenomenom. Then leak it to slashdot. Then release a movie. It becomes a hit.

    See: Armageddon, Blair Witch Project, etc.

    (suckers!)

  36. A lot of people don't grow food and they survive by DrSkwid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but take away their infrastructure and they will start struggling.

    Take a look at the early Industrial Revolution Cities in England. So overcrowded a plan was needed.
    The solution : criminalisation of poverty. That way the poor could be killed or transported.

    The sudden loss of computing would be totally devastating in the short term. And for mnay of us that could be as long as we live.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  37. Solution by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

    Flip your compass around, and it's as good as new!...if you can read backwards. I hate media hype, anyone mind linking to a decent non-profit driven science site or blog?

  38. GPS, et al... by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 2

    I'm not really so sure that a flipping or loss of magnetic poles would really be so catastrophic to life as we know it...

    --
    "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
  39. Dinosaurs extinct because of pole switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, couldn't this be another theory about the extinction of the dinosaurs (and humans too quite soon...)?

  40. Swap monitors? by Sex_On_The_Beach · · Score: 1, Funny

    Damn I need to buy a north pole compliant monitor when they flip:P -Southern Hemishpere Dude

  41. when you fit fit your data to a line... by drew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    be sure to use only two data points.

    according to another article that somebody else linked above, (here) this conclusion isn't based on an ongoing survey of the earth's magnetic field over the last 20 years (as implied by the observer article), but rather on the comparison of current data to a single set of data taken 20 years ago:

    But Ørsted is the first satellite to take a snapshot of the Earth's magnetic field for 20 years, and such scant data makes it difficult to predict future shifts.

    so while this may make a great shock news story (or hollywood movie plot) it hardly seems like anything approaching significant scientific research worth getting particularly alarmed about.

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    1. Re:when you fit fit your data to a line... by drew · · Score: 1

      er...
      "When you must fit your data to a line...."

      shoulda previewed the subject along with the comment, i guess.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  42. magnetic media by psyklopz · · Score: 1

    I'm suprised no one has posted this.

    Does anyone know if a flip in the poles would have any impact on magnetic storage?

    If so, get burnin!

  43. This is all because of the US elections by Allen+Varney · · Score: 4, Funny

    [TROLL]

    Vote a Republican administration into power, and the next thing you know, the magnetic field is gone.

    [/TROLL]

    1. Re:This is all because of the US elections by night_flyer · · Score: 4, Funny

      [TROLL]

      Quit blaming the Republicans, this all started when Clinton was in office.

      [/TROLL]

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    2. Re:This is all because of the US elections by jeti · · Score: 2

      Great!

      And maybe electrons will flow the other way, too.

    3. Re:This is all because of the US elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would that be a troll, though? Did your and tags get stripped by Slashcode?

    4. Re:This is all because of the US elections by flabbergasted · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Earth's magnetic field is being temporarily withdrawn while a new business model is developed. Free access to the magnetic field was always a weak business model, and in today's economy is no longer tenable. Once a method for allowing metered access is developed, the magnetic field will be restored.

    5. Re:This is all because of the US elections by djmcmath · · Score: 1

      void Troll (int ModPoints)
      {
      If only we had a better election system, the Green Party would have won like the voters in Florida clearly wanted, and all this wouldn't be happening!
      }

    6. Re:This is all because of the US elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fantastic! Then common current might actually refer to the real direction of the electron flow!

    7. Re:This is all because of the US elections by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      finally! my austin healy won't have a positive ground anymore!

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  44. Does this mean by aexandria · · Score: 0

    that our toilets will start flushing the other direction?

  45. magnetic poles may flip by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    it's gonna be interesting to see what happens to things like shortwave radio and satellite comms...

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:magnetic poles may flip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's gonna be interesting to see what happens to things like shortwave radio and satellite comms...
      Absolutely nothing will happen to radio. This might be the great event that the amateur radio nuts are waiting for!
  46. A Solution? by Daftspaniel · · Score: 1

    Could we reverse the polarity of the neutron flow ? :-)

    1. Re:A Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop that! You might wind up with a Doctor Who plot on your hands...oops, too late.

    2. Re:A Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like a plot for Star Trek.

    3. Re:A Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a Doctor Who quote, u evil trekkie u.

  47. It's not all bad by p3d0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On the bright side, if the poles flip, Earth's north pole will actually be a magnetic north.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  48. About the Reversal, and magnetosphere...... by danalien · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can this explain it?:

    "A planet's magnetosphere is provided through its magnetic field. To create a magnetic field, a planet or moon must have magnetic material such has iron, which is warm enough to move around to form currents within the planet."

    And isn't earth(s core) cooling down? - Can't this affect our magnetosphere? If the magnetic materail stop flowing?


    My imaginary plot (IMHO):

    Now I'm thinging that when earth switched poles, the core coold down, reversal happened, sometime after that earth got hit by a large enough meteor to restart our core (how elese could the core be restarted? there wasn't atomic weapons and the like back in those days, no! Good ol' fashion meteors had to suffice : )). Then earth keept it's (reverse) position till it coold down again, and re-reversed itself again. Sometime after, BAda'BOOM eine large enough meteor struck again, restarted our engine, and we keept on ticking.... untill soon enough (if we think 1000 year or more is soon..) when our core will stop flowing.

    Can someone please look up how long ago earth was struck by a large enough meteor to turn earth in to a giant blob of lava? : )
    I put my money on lets say 780 000 to one millon years ago :) (when the last revelsal was presumed to have happened.)


    Earth cooling down:

    Here's the tricky part; How much must the earth's core cool down for reversal to happen? Because for it to cool down entirilely it will take more than 1000 years.


    Reference:
    http://www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/class/100/ interior.html
    http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/earth/moon/ moon_magnetic_field.html&edu=high
    http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/physical_sc ience/magnetism/magnetic_materials.html&edu=hi gh
    http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns999 92152
    http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,69 03,837058,00.html

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
    1. Re:About the Reversal, and magnetosphere...... by cronus42 · · Score: 1

      Err... The last ELE (Extinction Level Event) was 65 MILLION years ago. I rather think that anything large enough to "turn the earth in to a giant blob of lava" would classify as a mass extinction. Humans were around 780K years ago. I think a 1+Km asteroid would have put a quite a damper on the human race! It seemed to have worked for the dinosaurs.

      Just how large would an asteroid have to be to "melt" the earth? Certainly the K-T asteroid that killed the Dinosaurs was not. It was well over 1Km. It made a big crater and probably burnt off most of the biomass on earth, but I think melting the Earth is a little much. If any impact were large enough, it may have been during the creation of our moon some billions of years ago.

      --
      Cronus
    2. Re:About the Reversal, and magnetosphere...... by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2

      Can someone please look up how long ago earth was struck by a large enough meteor to turn earth in to a giant blob of lava? : ) I put my money on lets say 780 000 to one millon years ago :) (when the last revelsal was presumed to have happened.)

      Interesting idea. That must be what gave the neanderthals such a hard time. Homo Sapiens' ability to walk on lava must have been the edge our kind needed to survive. How much money, by the way?

    3. Re:About the Reversal, and magnetosphere...... by danalien · · Score: 1

      That makes sence!

      After I posted the comment I read some more, and came to the same conclusion (little to late to revice once post :)).


      Reference:
      http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast15feb_1 .htm
      http://istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/earthmag/reversal.htm

      --
      I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
    4. Re:About the Reversal, and magnetosphere...... by danalien · · Score: 1

      Not that much money; was just a figure of speach.

      Instead of rewriting a reply to someone else I'll jsut add a link to it, the url-is: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=44670&threshol d=0&commentsort=0&tid=134&mode=thread&pid=4636856# 4638146

      --
      I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  49. Re:Business model - the MS bug by DrainBead · · Score: 5, Funny
    Or how about this:-

    Consultant: The MS bug (Magnetic Shift bug) is like the classic Y2K bug.

    Businessman: What's that?

    Consultant: It involved a near global catastrophy which occured aroung the 19th century. Only the speedy responce by excellent programmers saved civilisation.

    Businessman: How does this affect me?

    Consultant: You need a team of 25 programmers, at least, to write bug fixes for the software in your toaster so that it can cope with the reversal of the magentic field.

    Businessman: But I thought the toaster is AI and can learn these things?

    Consultant: Trust me - your toaster needs this because...

    Businessman: OK, OK -sigh-, spare me the details... how much?

    Consultant: -rubbing hands- Well...

    --
    Dyslexics of the world, untie!
  50. question by fferreres · · Score: 2

    "which couldnt make anything extinct 250000 years ago"

    Are we REALLY really _re-a-lly_ reeeeeeaaaaaly s-u-r-e about this? The fact that many species managed to survive is no indication of how much did not survive.

    I particularly don't care if we humans survive, if it will mean the end of life as we know it (say for example, enough food). We can be very advanced, but if for any reasons growing crops gets harder we'd be in real trouble feeding 5B humans.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
    1. Re:question by Eggplant62 · · Score: 2
      I particularly don't care if we humans survive, if it will mean the end of life as we know it (say for example, enough food). We can be very advanced, but if for any reasons growing crops gets harder we'd be in real trouble feeding 5B humans.
      Really, man. This planet has been waaay overdue for a good enema. The more I look around me, the more I note that most of the species homo sapiens is no longer sapient, IOW, truly thinking, thoughtful beings. We're stripping off the vegetation and paving everything over, polluting the seas with nasty chemicals and wrecking the environment. If the end of the magnetosphere as we know it doesn't take the human population out, something someday will.

      We're too friggin' dull to realize how badly we're fucking this planet already. I don't expect there will be some massive wakeup call in the next century.

      Rich
    2. Re:question by smokin_juan · · Score: 1

      Bah! Whats the difference if we kill ourselves via pollution or are killed by nature? Depletion of ionosphere? Radiation bursts? Sounds like a WMD(tm)! Maybe Billy Bob Bush ought to bomb god for trying to aquire them... We have all the proof that he is. Lets get those resoloutions written - one more chink in the armour of Homand Security(tm)! Some say the end is near Some say we'll see armageddon soon I certainly hope we will I sure could use a vacation from this bull shit three ring circus side show...

    3. Re:question by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      there's the idea that evolution happens in periodic "bursts". methinks massive radiation might have somthing to do with it due to a flip-over of the earth's magnetic field.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then just kill yourself and save the rest of us from your pathetic existence.

    5. Re:question by JebusIsLord · · Score: 2

      Well, then we should assume that most speciations happen around the time of a polar shift then shouldn't we? This is not the case. It is actually really easy to check for this, so I can say it with great certainty. When a lava flow covers up fossils, the lava is polarized in the direction of the current magnetic field, so in SE africa for instance where there is lots of lava, we have a really good idea of what lived when. There appears to be no correlation.

      --
      Jeremy
    6. Re:question by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1
      I sure could use a vacation from this bull shit three ring circus side show...
      Thanks for chiming in, Maynard. It makes me feel good to know the members of Tool read /. Makes me feel even closer to the band. How's the tour going? Yall are on you 2nd day of break, right? Well, ya rocked ass in Richmond, VA. Keep up the good work.
    7. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you totally missed that he was quoting tool lyrics....so quick to judge.

  51. Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the time this has any effect, we'll all be dead.

    My children will be dead.

    Their children will be dead.

    So it won't affect anyone I know.

    So why worry, particulary since we can't do a damned thing about it?

  52. I hope that's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The date for the flip will be 5/5/2005, according to Sightings.

    Woohoo! I guess that means I'll become a chick magnet. Three more years and I can get rid of my pr0n collection...

    1. Re:I hope that's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'll take it!

  53. Core temp. by Chaugnar+Faugn · · Score: 1

    What's this "Given that temperatures at such depths rival those of the Sun's surface"?

  54. Widespread effects by X!0mbarg · · Score: 1

    Here's my silly little concern:

    How might this affect things like GPS systems, the internet, and/or similar electronic devices that are in some way tuned to the magnetic fields of the planet, or at least susceptable to fields? Are there any indications of just how much flux happens when the poles flip?

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:Widespread effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you mean, how would it effect the internet, or gps? neither use the earth's magnetic field. GPS is wholly independent of magnetic navigation, and the earth's magnetic field has no real effect upon fiber optic or copper communications systems. Duh.

      I think a bunch of people have been posting stuff like this in the hopes that some moderator will say "Holy crap! this effects us! +5 for insight!"

      Or maybe the threat of the loss of the field that protects us from solar and cosmic radiation, resulting in increased burth defects and cancer, isnt enough unless it also threatens our ability to play Counter Strike online.

  55. spin me around a new direction by JDizzy · · Score: 2

    Does this mean the Earth will want to spin the other direction, or is the Earths spin controlled by other forces, and not magnatism? Besides, what magnetic pole is currently the positive side, and what is the negative side? Also, How would this affect the commercial airlines with their fancy expensive compases? Does it really matter considering that the Earth might have problems when the magetic sphere of protection lets the evil radiation monsters thru the window? We might all jsut get cancer and die, right?

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
    1. Re:spin me around a new direction by PhuCknuT · · Score: 2

      The earth's spin isn't "controled" by anything other than inertia (and gravity of the moon but that's a minor effect).

    2. Re:spin me around a new direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fancy expensive compasses? Uh...

      Most airplanes use a ball compass that floats in kerosene to initially set and periodically check the directional gyro, which uses a fast-spinning gyroscope to maintain the proper indication of north. the point of this is that when the airplane is doing various maneuvers (anything other than straight-and-level flight, potentially) the magnetic compass can deviate quite dramatically from the correct indication, but the gyro will remain accurate.

      Also, commercial airlines can often afford such newfangled navigation aids as GPS, LORAN, VOR (not really that newfangled), and ADF (VERY not-newfangled), all of which are independent of magnetic navigation.

      As posted earlier, magnetic north is the "south" side of the field (i cant confirm this, but it does ring a bell).

      I think the only serious concern would be radiation, and the fact that this would wipe out most of the populations of migrating birds. Guess we'll have to have peking chicken instead of peking duck, eh?

  56. won't matter by nickclarke · · Score: 1

    The Earth's magnetic poles are actually the wrong way round at the moment - the noth pole is magnetic south. The only difference will be that the red end of the compass needle will point south, and anything else that depends on the earth's magnetic field will get confused.

  57. News or Movie Ad? You decide. by UnclePaeng · · Score: 0, Redundant
    From the article:
    It is unlikely that humans could do much. Burrowing thousands of miles into solid rock to set things right would stretch the technological prowess of our descendants to bursting point, though such limitations do not worry film scriptwriters. Paramount's latest sci-fi thriller, The Core - directed by Englishman Jon Amiel, and starring Hilary Swank and Aaron Eckhart - depicts a world beset by just such a polar reversal, with radiation sweeping the planet.

    The solution, according to the film, to be released next year, involves scientists drilling into Earth's mantle to set off a nuclear blast that will halt the reversal.
  58. Source of the magnetic field. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll also point out that no one really knows how the planet's magnetic field is generated.

    Sure we do. It's from dynamo currents caused by convection in the (liquid) outer core.

    Magnetic field flips happen when turbulence grows enough to disrupt these patterns briefly.

    This is why Jupiter has a much stronger magnetic field than Earth (huge liquid metallic hydrogen layer, and a very powerful internal heat source), and why the moon has almost no magnetic field (no liquid core; the only field is the one that was "frozen in" when the moon first cooled).

    1. Re:Source of the magnetic field. by benwb · · Score: 2

      Except for the guy that thinks the core is a giant nuclear reactor. Most geophysicists tend to ignore him, but they're not really sure he's wrong. See a writeup in Discover here.

    2. Re:Source of the magnetic field. by canadian_right · · Score: 2
      There isn't a strong concenus that the "dynamo" theory is correct. It is a bit of a mystery how the Earth's magnetic field is generated. There isn't a better theory currently, but the mechanism isn't fully understood.

      Origin of mag field

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    3. Re:Source of the magnetic field. by stanwirth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll also point out that no one really knows how the planet's magnetic field is generated.
      CT: Sure we do. It's from dynamo currents caused by convection in the (liquid) outer core.

      Ok wiseguy. So you've got a forward model of MHD in spherical shells at high Reynolds number with perfect predictive power? Yeh Sure.

      Look, even if you did, you'd have to have the initial conditions measured within like half a millimeter, at the formation of the earth, to deploy it successfully in predicting the next flip with any accuracy.

      Right now, we're doing the best anyone can do with an inherently chaotic system (such as an MHD dual dynamo in planetary interiors) which is to make predictions about what will happen in the next time-step based on windowed autocorrelation of the time-series of measurements in the past.

      But as far as really understanding the dynamos that generate planetary magnetic fields, i.e. having a mathematical model with demonstrated predictive power, no we don't.

      If you do, we look forward to seeing your results at the next AGU meeting.

    4. Re:Source of the magnetic field. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      Ok wiseguy. So you've got a forward model of MHD in spherical shells at high Reynolds number with perfect predictive power? Yeh Sure.

      Ok, I'll bite.

      How does absence of an exquisitely detailed model with perfect predictive power qualify as "not knowing [at all] how the planet's magnetic field is generated"?

      Especially when you'll have a lot of fun finding a model with perfect predictive power for *anything*?
      Should we go back to the "well, maybe it _is_ a giant bar magnet" stage alluded to in the post my reply was attached to?

      Nice try.

    5. Re:Source of the magnetic field. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      There isn't a strong concenus that the "dynamo" theory is correct. It is a bit of a mystery how the Earth's magnetic field is generated. There isn't a better theory currently, but the mechanism isn't fully understood.

      My point was that we are far from knowing *nothing* about how planetary magnetic fields are generated, and can in fact be reasonably confident that some extension or variant of a dynamo model will in fact accurately reflect reality.

    6. Re:Source of the magnetic field. by m1a1 · · Score: 1

      This is pure theory. The truth is that all of tectonic theory is completely unproven. I am not saying it is wrong, it is as close as we have to an answer, but you shouldn't preach it as fact.

  59. Four words by robian · · Score: 3, Funny

    Beam me up, Scottie.

  60. Global warming by dheltzel · · Score: 1

    When I started reading the article, I was just sure they would point out that this is another sure effect of the over-consumption of fossil fuels by the US. I guess they decided to save that for a followup article and conclude this one with ad blurb for an upcoming film. It's nice to see them using some scientific restraint.

  61. Imposing our own field. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For a lark, I did the calculations for artificially imposing a magnetic field if the Earth ever lost its own.

    It turns out to be feasible even today, though horribly, horribly expensive. You'd build a mesh of copper cables around the equator (or superconducting, but copper's losses aren't that bad for this). Then you'd slowly ramp up the current until you have a magnetic field comparable in strength to today's.

    Ramping up would be slow because of inductive power storage. The current loop and associated magnetic field store a *vast* amount of energy, all of which needs to be provided in order to bring the field up to strength. The present power output of all electrical plants on the planet over a decade or so would do it, if I remember correctly, so this is feasible. The power cost to maintain the field, even with copper cables, is much lower; put, say, a 10% tax on electricity, and you've paid for the extra plants to feed the mesh.

    You'd use a mesh instead of a single cable _because_ of the amount of stored energy. If you break the current path of an inductor, current flows anyways, arcing across the gap. This only dies down as resistive losses across the gap dissipate the power stored in the inductor. Think about this - all of the inductor's stored power is dissipated in one place (the break), and we're storing an awfully large amount of power in this current loop. If the loop was a single cable and this cable was broken, you'd get something in the range of a 10-gigaton yield at the point of breakage. A mesh provides many alternate current paths, so breaks from sabotage or just plain wear can be repaired safely (as long as you overspec the current rating enough to allow the other paths to safely take up the load).

    A copper cable a hundred metres wide, or ten thousand one-metre cables, would do the trick. You might _have_ to use copper, too; even if you spread the cables out to make a more uniform field near the Earth's surface, field strength near each wire would be much greater than the breakdown point of most superconductors.

    We'd probably never bother doing this, but it's a fun thought experiment :).

    1. Re:Imposing our own field. by drew · · Score: 1

      just out ouf curiosity, did you bother to calculate just how much raw copper you'd need to make ten thousand one-meter cables each long enough to circle the earth's equator?

      and if you did, how does that compare to the amount of copper mined in the world every year? or even the entire amount of available copper in the world?

      oh, and by the way, given the amount of force that woukd be required to cut or break a hundred meter copper cable in the first place, i dont think the 10-gigaton or so discharge that results would be all that much more destructive....

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    2. Re:Imposing our own field. by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      And after turning it on, we start noticing some problems with the Earth's rotation. Pretty soon we find the Earth rotating using an east-west axis because we've just built a big stinking electric motor!!!

      Oh sure, the governments that sponsored the project might act all innocent, but the fact is, tourism to Ecuador and Bali will just never be the same, considering that one never has day and the other never has night...

      (haha)

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    3. Re:Imposing our own field. by foqn1bo · · Score: 2

      For a lark, I did the calculations for artificially imposing a magnetic field if the Earth ever lost its own.

      You can talk to birds ?!

      :D

      Wow. I need to start keeping up with science.

    4. Re:Imposing our own field. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      just out ouf curiosity, did you bother to calculate just how much raw copper you'd need to make ten thousand one-meter cables each long enough to circle the earth's equator?

      *pulls out calculator* About four trillion metric tonnes, give or take a factor of four or so. If you're using aluminum, divide by about a factor of two (it's a third the density, but slightly more resistive).

      and if you did, how does that compare to the amount of copper mined in the world every year? or even the entire amount of available copper in the world?

      The amount available is obscenely large - you'd just have to strip-mine the faces of all continents to get at it.

      Annual production of copper is around 16 Mt. Annual production of aluminum, which is probably more abundant given that the crust is aluminosilicates, is 26 Mt.

      If we needed to build the cable badly enough to invest the effort, we'd vastly increase production (probably of aluminum, again because it's common). Assuming that we have enough bauxite strip mines and smelters to make power the limiting production factor, we'd produce about 0.1 Mt per second using the amount of power we'd devote to powering up the loop. It would take us about 5-10 years to produce the required quantity, not counting the time required to build smelters next to all of the power plants, railways for transport, and so forth (though some of the transport work has already been done, at coal-fuelled plants, at least).

      It's not something that's _likely_ to be done, but it's _possible_ to do with the world's current industrial capability. Which is what makes it a fun thought-experiment.

      oh, and by the way, given the amount of force that woukd be required to cut or break a hundred meter copper cable in the first place, i dont think the 10-gigaton or so discharge that results would be all that much more destructive.

      It would, by about a factor of at least a hundred million.

      How much dynamite does it take to turn a city block full of office buildings into a hundred-metre crater? That's about the level of force involved (maybe add a factor of 100 for the added weight and strength).

    5. Re:Imposing our own field. by Bitmanhome · · Score: 2

      So if there's that much energy in the magnetic field, couldn't we build a Great Loop to suck the energy out of the Earth's natural field?

      The only way we could damage the field would be to affect the subsurface eddies that generate it. And if we could do that, then the reverse is true -- the Great Loop could be used to move the eddies back into position, averting this 'disaster'.

      So if the Earth's magnetic field is generated by eddies, how much power would it take to push them around?

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    6. Re:Imposing our own field. by GospelHead821 · · Score: 2

      Eddy's a big wuss. It isn't hard at all to push him around.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    7. Re:Imposing our own field. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      So if there's that much energy in the magnetic field, couldn't we build a Great Loop to suck the energy out of the Earth's natural field?

      We could only actually tap much energy either by having a convenient large conducting object moving quickly with respect to the Earth with kinetic energy larger than the energy we want to tap, or by adding our load within the electric current loops in the dynamo (in the Earth's outer core). Neither is likely to be practical.

      If the loop were built, there would be coupling between it and the dynamo, so we might get some power out, but it would probably be much less than the total amount stored.

      The only way we could damage the field would be to affect the subsurface eddies that generate it. And if we could do that, then the reverse is true -- the Great Loop could be used to move the eddies back into position, averting this 'disaster'.

      This would work, though on a much coarser level (we'd have a hard time affecting individual eddies, but turbulence domains would tend to align with our field when they settled down). ...Actually, they'd probably be aligned _against_ our field, making a weak pocket in the middle (our field drops off more slowly than the core's field due to larger radius).

      So if the Earth's magnetic field is generated by eddies, how much power would it take to push them around?

      To completely rearrange them would probably take energy comparable to the energy stored in the field. What power this translates to depends on how long you want it to take. The minimum amount of power required - and the amount required to stabilize the dynamo, if we want to do that - would likely be much lower (just enough to offset parasitic resistance losses within the dynamo).

    8. Re:Imposing our own field. by lommer · · Score: 2

      We couldn't get energy from the magnetic field without either moving the wire through it or moving the magnietic field relative to the wire (or mesh, same dif). Neither are really feasable, but then, our magnetic field is supposed to be flipping now! so maybe we could build a once-off enormous electric generator for the duration of this flip?

    9. Re:Imposing our own field. by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      If the loop was a single cable and this cable was broken, you'd get something in the range of a 10-gigaton yield at the point of breakage.

      We can't even get folks to agree to a nuclear plant in the same city - and you want to propose running cables the size of small skyscrapers through their backyards with the caveat that a breakdown could release more energy than every explosive device of any kind ever made in the history of the earth...?

    10. Re:Imposing our own field. by freuddot · · Score: 2

      Please provide numbers and formulas backing up your argumentation. I am very doubtfull.

      Also, you would need to take into account the fact that the melted iron current in the earth's core would react to this field. Or, seen otherwise, if the pole were to flip, they'd rip appart you little wire around the equator in no time.

      J.

    11. Re:Imposing our own field. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please provide numbers and formulas backing up your argumentation. I am very doubtfull.

      Consider this construct to be similar in characteristics to a solenoid of radius 6.5e6 metres and length, oh, 4e6 metres. Because length is not substantially larger than radius, we can't just use the solenoid field equation, as field strength outside the solenoid would not be zero. But, if we assume the effective path for integration at the average field strength is a circle, we get about 4e7 metres. Let's be pessimistic and say 1e8 metres.

      This gives:

      B = 1.26e-6 * I / 1e8

      Substituting in B = 1e-4 T (stronger than Earth's current magnetic field), we solve to get:

      I = 8e9

      So we need a sheet current on the order of 10 billion amperes in the solenoid (divide by the number of windings or mesh cables to get the current in one mesh cable).

      The copper cable supplying power to your house has a rated current density of about 100 amperes per square centimetre of cross-sectional area. This is both using air cooling and adding a substantial safety factor. Using the same numbers, we get about 1e6 A/m^2 carrying capacity, giving us a cable of 1e4 m^2 cross-section (100m x 100m) required to carry *all* of the solenoid's sheet current. Parcel this out in smaller cables as you see fit.

      Let's sanity check the cable numbers. Copper has a resistivity of 1.7e-8 ohm*m at 20 degrees C. A cable 4e7 metres long with cross-section 1e4 m^2 has a resistance of 1.7e-8 * 4e7 / 1e4 = about 7e-5 ohms. At 1e10 amperes, this gives a power dissipation of about 7e15 W. ...So we in fact need a thicker cable, or a smaller current (weaker field), either one by a factor of about 30, if we only have 10 TW of available power. If we decide to use a superconducting cable, of course, we have no resistive power losses; we just have to make sure the field strength near any of the cables is less than about 1 T (for LN2-cooled superconductors) or 10 T (for LHe-cooled superconductors). A superconducting cable is much more expensive than a copper cable, but much less cabling is required. Alternatively, we could build more power plants, but building more cabling is almost certainly cheaper.

      To calculate energy stored, we need the inductance of the solenoid:

      L = mu0 * A / length (1 winding)

      A loop with radius 6.5e6 metres has an area of about 1.27e14 square metres. Therefore:

      L = 1.26e-6 * 1.27e14 / 1e8
      L = about 1.6 H

      Stored energy is therefore:

      E = 0.5 * 1.6 H * (1e10 A)^2
      E = 8e19 J

      Assuming 10 TW as our rate of energy transfer to the magnet, we need 8e6 seconds to charge the solenoid, or about 14 weeks. If our power supply is more modest (or if resistive losses are substantial), charging time is longer. However, it would still be accomplished within the span of a few years even in the worst case.

      In summary, building and powering up the device is possible, though superconducting cables would make the construction much easier. As per my previous messages, you can certainly smelt enough aluminum for a resistive cable within a reasonable length of time. Producing the required amounts of high-temperature superconductor for a liquid nitrogen cooled cable is open to question. An ordinary metal cable could be made to superconduct at liquid helium temperatures, but maintaining the liquid helium envelope would consume a substantial amount of power (liquid nitrogen is much easier to make). Both methods use off-the-shelf technology that's already widely used in industry (LN2 for power transfer cables, LHe for magnets in MRI machines and particle accelerators).

      Also, you would need to take into account the fact that the melted iron current in the earth's core would react to this field. Or, seen otherwise, if the pole were to flip, they'd rip appart you little wire around the equator in no time.

      The solenoid described above actually stores more energy than the Earth's magnetic field does in *total*. If the entire core decided to do a back flip, the solenoid could take it. In practice, core disturbances are almost certainly much smaller - the core's field represents the balance point where power input matches resistive and other losses within the dynamo. The core's heat source doesn't have the ability to change the dynamo's state very quickly (field flips take thousands of years).

      Satisfied now? It's easy enough to check my numbers.

    12. Re:Imposing our own field. by freuddot · · Score: 2

      You say a cross section of : 100m x 100m

      To me, that gives : 100m x 100m x 40 000 000m
      Or 400 000 000 000 m3 copper.

      Copper is 8.96 gr/cm3
      Or, 8960 kg/m3

      That gives you 3.584x10^15 Kg of Copper.

      Acoording to :
      Internation copper study group
      , the world copper production is about 15000000 Kg/yr.

      That gives us the final number of 238 933 333 years to extract the needed copper, assuming there is enough on earth.

      I don't think this is possible.

    13. Re:Imposing our own field. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      That gives you 3.584x10^15 Kg of Copper.

      Acoording to :
      Internation copper study group
      [nrcan.gc.ca], the world copper production is about 15000000 Kg/yr.


      See my previous post on this topic (better yet, go to my original post, set your config to threshold -1 nested, and read the whole tree).

      Upshot: Aluminum is probably the best (resistive) material to build this out of, and if we assume we're power-limited (i.e. put a smelter and railway beside each power plant in the project), we can produce enough within a reasonable length of time. There's no shortage of ore (we'd just end up with strip-mines dotting the landscape).

      Same type of argument applies for LHe-cooled metallic superconductors. We'd use less material, but it would be something less common-as-dirt than aluminum (though nothing exotic). For cooling, we'd probably use LH2 instead of LHe as it would be easier to acquire the quantities needed (about the same operating temperature range).

  62. Missed the quote by BubbaHokey · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article actually says "could disappear over the next 1,000 years" This could be interperted as it will disappear and be gone for the next 1,000 years OR as it will slowly dissapate over the next 1,000 years. After reading the article the quotes "...show some can last for thousands of years" and "... have lasted only a few weeks" lead me to believe that they believe that IT could happen any time and last 1,000 years with no protection. I wonder how my great childern will look as morlocks?

    1. Re:Missed the quote by Abreu · · Score: 2

      I wonder how my great childern will look as morlocks? ...or (gasp!) Cowboyneal!

      Still time to get a vasectomy!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  63. Magneto Did This Years Ago by grendelkhan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Back in the Claremont/Byrne/Austin days, we survived that, we'll survive this.

    --
    Wu-Tang Name: Half-Cut Skeleton Get your own Wu-Na
  64. The absolute... by failrate · · Score: 1

    most terrifying thing about that article for me was not only that Hollywood is turning it into a craptastic movie, but also demonstrating the horrifying simplifications of logic that are foisted on the "common man" all the time. E.g., they bore a hole into the earth and use a nuke to "halt the reversal"!!! If Wim Wenders was directing it, they'd just live in their stupid caves and realize that, maybe, the reversal is something that has to happen.

    --
    Voodoo Girl is the bomb!
  65. FAQ: Magnetic Reversals by loz · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/earthmag/magnQ&A1.htm#q6

    with the Holywood garbage left out.

    loz

  66. Any Devices Use A Magnetic Compass? by N8F8 · · Score: 2

    It seems to me that the relevant question should be, "what devices rely on magnetic compasses?". With GPS around I'm not too sure what does. Getting that Compass Merit Badge may get tougher tho.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  67. Air. by ZigMonty · · Score: 2
    Yes, but we have an atmosphere to provide additional protection. How much protection it provides? I don't know. Our satellites OTOH will be truly out in the open.

    On the plus side equatorial auroras should be cool. Can any people better informed confirm if this will happen?

  68. What about our cassette tapes? by milkid7 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Excuse me for being a dinosaur, but what will those old cassettes you have in the back of your closet sound like once the magnetic poles flip? Backwards? Out-of-phase? Inside-out? Paul is Dead? Long live Paul?? ARgggghh!

    1. Re:What about our cassette tapes? by PhuCknuT · · Score: 2

      I'm sure this was supposed to be a joke, but everyone seems to be saying it so let me point out the obvious flaw. If magnetic recordings of any kind could be affected by the earths magnetic field switching, then you would be able to destroy them by just picking them up and turning them around.

  69. RAM? by ZigMonty · · Score: 2

    Optic fibre might be fine but what about RAM? I take it that the increase in high energy particles hitting us will randomly flip a few bits? Pretty easily fixed with redundancy but still bad.

    1. Re:RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Optic fibre might be fine but what about RAM? I take it that the increase in high energy particles hitting us will randomly flip a few bits? Pretty easily fixed with redundancy but still bad.
      Hurray for optical computing!

      http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/images/nanosecon d/thepaper.pdf
  70. Looks like advertising to me by markalot · · Score: 1

    Someone making that new movie thought up a great campaign. I see this as nothing more than one of those extremely unlikely events that makes a movie, and then makes to to the press.

  71. Suddenly... by RealBeanDip · · Score: 1

    Breaking out the tin-foil hats doesn't seem like such a bad idea after all.

    --

    You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

  72. a disaster of biblical proportions? by Bartacus · · Score: 1

    Poles flipping, fire and brimstone coming down from the skies. Rivers and seas boiling! 40 years of darkness, earthquakes, volcanos. The dead rising from the grave! Human sacrifice, dogs and cats, living together... mass hysteria!

    --
    -- he's not heavy, he's my sysadmin!
    1. Re:a disaster of biblical proportions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol good one

      that reminds me, gotta get the new GB/GBII dvds

  73. Speculation by akheron1 · · Score: 1

    Ugh, I keep reading posts of people complaining about how we will all die because the magnetosphere will completely disappear. This seems to be a misinterpretation. The earth will just have no definitive poles. Besides, if the earth did completely lose it's magnetosphere whenever this happened, the last time it happened would have completely stripped away all atmosphere and life on the planet, which didn't seem to happen...

    --
    Close the world. .txEn eht nepO
  74. 20 Ways the World Could End by MicroBerto · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Read #6 on this article... An all-around cool article, even if maybe a switch doesn't do anything too harmful

    This kinda freaks me out though..

    --
    Berto
  75. Whimps! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    If I can live for decades with my face inches away from an electron particle accelerator pointed in my direction, no problem!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  76. Re:Highly suspicious - yes your think'n is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hollywood has it all figured out. Create some plot that involves something far-fetched but science based.

    Ok.....

    Blair Witch Project

    Please outline the 'science' of The Blair Witch Project.

  77. A few affects:- by jago25_98 · · Score: 0

    - silicon affected
    - more cancer in general
    - more energy onto earth as a whole

    As one of my lecturer put it:-

    "I don't know why all these people are worrying about asteroids; we're going to fry when the poles reverse in your lifetime"

  78. science ... fiction? by jdkane · · Score: 2, Insightful
    And as Scientific American reports this week, this interpretation has now been backed up by computer simulation studies.

    You can prove anything in a computer simulation. Whether it will happen or not is a totally different story, but for sure you can get funding if you tweak your variables properly. In geek terms, look at most video games where I can take a rocket blast and still survive, even though my hitpoints are lowered. Sure games are not true simulations, but neither are true simulations perfect, or often even close. It's a focus on one specific item with all the variables included to prove only that point. Believe the simulation worked; don't believe the simulation is correct.

    All of a sudden some scientist picks something up, then a few more jump on the bandwagon, and then by the time we see the article, the whole theory is written in stone, even though the article contains very little fact -- for all we (the readers) know it could be pure speculation. The article makes bold statements and doesn't quote any proof. So take it with a huge grain of salt. How do we know that "Gauthier Hulot of the Paris Geophysical Institute" isn't regarded in his field with the same amount of controversy as the Drs. Igor and Grichka Bogdanov who are physicists that supposedly "don't know how to do physics" ?

    And then the article mentions Hollywood!?! Yah, that sheds a lot of creditable light on the whole theory. Now are we are either: dealing with a Hollywood film house that picked up the idea from scientists, or scientists who want to ride on the tails of pop culture?

    But we all love this dramatic stuff about the world ending, so it's no wonder that everybody -- whether scientist or check-out attendant, mathemetician or word perfect user -- jumps on the bandwagon. Enjoy your drama as we have all done here at slash/dot., but seek proof and fact before believing it will actually affect your real world. There are too many "important" people out there that believe they know what they are talking about or have agendas. It's hardly possible to spend all the needed time (as a reader outside the scientific fields) to gather the facts, proof, and knowledge needed in a world overloaded with information both true and false. Just find a couple articles from scientists that refute one another. That will help to provide a more balanced perspective. For example, read this message board for some real discussion about the theory at hand, instead of discussion about a newspaper article.
    For example, you can get some real facts about Field Intensities During Polarity Transitions and Excursions linked from Message #15 in the discussion board.

    The articles and theories are very important, but they still exist to be proven wrong, especially when they are relatively new.

  79. And we thought human activity ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was responsible for the ozone hole. Guess not.

  80. Remember Y2K? by dopefish3 · · Score: 1

    I certainly hope I don't see software like this coming out: "Magnetic Pole shift Compliancy software" ;P

  81. An evil ploy by Yavi · · Score: 1

    This is *obviously* a tactical move by the compass manufacturers. They want everybody to have to upgrade their compasses.

  82. The farmers and me... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    If they don't give me food, then I hit them, and if they still won't give me food... then I hit them again... (Maybe I should work out a better plan) Oh well, there's always venison.

  83. Haven't we seen this movie? by Aquitaine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Synopsis:

    EARTH IS DOOMED!

    Solution:

    President (played by Morgan Freeman) meets with Special Emergency Response Team, discovers that all primary systems designed to prevent the Destruction of Earth are useless because they were all designed to shoot down missiles from Korea and China. Cabinet advisor recalls a brilliant, 'loose cannon' scientist/oil rig captain/handsome hollywood actor who 'just might be able to save us.'

    Handsome actor collects racially-diverse crew including both genders and several archetypes. They build a giant drill, which breaks at the last minute. Handsome actor has flashback to childhood, when he accidentally made a sinkhole in the beach with a toy shovel and is able to dig the remaining 10 miles with his fingernails and teeth.

    Team plants Nuclear Device Designed to Save Us All From Certain Death and detonates it, but of course it just makes things worse. Handsome actor inserts wrench into Earth's core, solving the problem, and then dies of radiation poisoning after making love to the attractive, sweedish scientist whose role (other than that) in the movie is as vague as her scientific credentials.

    That's just my idea, though. I'm sure theirs will be totally different!

    1. Re:Haven't we seen this movie? by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2

      But you forgot....

      The handsome actor's father was a worldwide-known physicist that had to leave him in early childhood to help out with The Great War(tm). He dies in the war. Throughout the story, the handsome actor is plagued by the premonition that he will die as well.

    2. Re:Haven't we seen this movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Handsome actor inserts wrench into Earth's core, solving the problem, and then dies of radiation poisoning

      What are our options for undying him for the sequel?

  84. Are you thinking what I'm thinking? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    This is going to completely screw those magnetic car ID sensors!

    In your face Big Brother!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  85. nope :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, he means they, from the third world countries, that need far fewer resources that are likely to fail in order to survive.

  86. Ok, let's get out of here now by Control-Z · · Score: 1


    Who's with me!!!1111

    Seriously though, something catostrophic WILL happen some day, so I think we need to get people living on the moon, on Mars, or maybe even a moon of Jupiter.

    Sure a catostrophe may not happen in our lifetime, but whenever it does happen, it will probably take us by surprise because there's always the security thought that "this won't happen to me." Well it can and will.

    1. Re:Ok, let's get out of here now by cronus42 · · Score: 1

      We can't even get our government to admit that social security is doomed. How are we going to convince them to spend billions of dollars on shipping ppl to Mars?

      --
      Cronus
    2. Re:Ok, let's get out of here now by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2

      If the earth is fucked, living on the moon isn't going to be much better.

  87. Sounds like a great film! by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    Woa! Drilling into the Earth's core to set off and explosion to halt the reversal of the magnetic feild shift. If Jerry Bruckheimer ever heard about this . . . !

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  88. Or worse yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't think about that scenario. I hope all my records are not stored on magnetic media though....

  89. How much data? by Spunk · · Score: 2

    Reversals happen every 250,000 years or so, and as there has not been one for almost a million years, we are due one soon.

    What? If there hasn't been one for a million years, I think a much more reasonable conclusion is that the "every 250,000 years" statistic needs some refinement.

    1. Re:How much data? by drew · · Score: 1

      i remember reading about this some time ago, and i think the key is that they may happen every 250,000 years.

      if memory serves me correctly, every 250,000 years or so, the earth's magnetic field begins to break down and the poles begin to wander a bit. when the field begins to strengthen again, it may or may not reverse polarity.

      the magnetic field breakdowns tend to be much worse when the poles actually flip. however, there doesnt appear to be any pattern as to whether or not the flip will occur - which means that the field could change every 250,000 years, or it could stay the same for several million. evidence of both cases has been found at different points in the fossil record.

      anyway, this is all from memory of something that i read a very long time ago, so take with the appropriate dosage of salt.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    2. Re:How much data? by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Ah, that makes a good deal more sense.

  90. What next? by joelil · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that all electrical devices will run backward once they flip?

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers.
  91. nah, its time to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the human race REALLY needs to evolve. Most people agree that most people are stupid. Maybe some good old-fashioned radiation-based random genetic alterations are just what we need to cure the small-mindedness which plagues 99% of the human population.

    1. Re:nah, its time to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great idea! now go and stick you head in the microwave and press 'cook' for 10 minutes...

    2. Re:nah, its time to evolve by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Most people agree that most people are stupid.

      "I see stupid people"

    3. Re:nah, its time to evolve by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but you couldn't base a movie on that theme. Actually, with reality shows being what they are perhaps you could.

  92. Film's Solution? by Tellalian · · Score: 2, Funny

    The solution, according to the film, to be released next year, involves scientists drilling into Earth's mantle to set off a nuclear blast that will halt the reversal.

    Isn't that Hollywood's solution for everything?

    1. Re:Film's Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! Bobby broke up with his girlfriend! I know! Lets drill a hole in her and set off a nuke, to *spart* the love back!

      Radiactive Love, coming in 2003 to a theatre near you!

    2. Re:Film's Solution? by blamanj · · Score: 2

      Dang. I'm starting to worry about those copy-protected CD's now.

  93. bah! by jafac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If this has happened every 250,000 years, it's obviously not a threat to the existence of life on this planet.

    Apparently this article is a flare, to get the public thinking about magnetic field reversal, to hype the upcoming disaster-movie The Core. Expect this story to appear on CNN soon.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:bah! by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

      It's already making its first run around the world in 80 minutes. Russian media have already picked it up... So it is probable that soon we will see Y3K crisis building up... I wonder how any billions state budgets will pour in this... Anyway, jounalists, priests, doomsday analytics will not loose their jobs for the next 1000 years.

    2. Re:bah! by Plutor · · Score: 2

      > If this has happened every 250,000 years, it's obviously not a threat to the existence of life on this planet

      There's a big difference between a threat to the existance of life and a threat to human civilization. A non-life-threatening event that destroys civililzation could be just as bad. Humans don't handle abrupt change very well.

  94. Atmospheres and gravity wells. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

    I used to think this to, but Titan has even less gravity than Mars yet keeps an atmosphere that is about 50% thicker than Earths.

    Titan's also a lot colder than Mars.

    The criterion for keeping an atmosphere, if I remember correctly, is for the mean velocity of gas molecules at the ambient temperature to be less than 10% of escape velocity. That keeps the fraction of molecules _at_ escape velocity low enough for evaporation to be negligible.

    So, a colder world can get away with a shallower gravity well.

    1. Re:Atmospheres and gravity wells. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2
      I used to think this to, but Titan has even less gravity than Mars yet keeps an atmosphere that is about 50% thicker than Earths.
      Titan's also a lot colder than Mars.

      The criterion for keeping an atmosphere, if I remember correctly, is for the mean velocity of gas molecules at the ambient temperature to be less than 10% of escape velocity. That keeps the fraction of molecules _at_ escape velocity low enough for evaporation to be negligible.

      So, a colder world can get away with a shallower gravity well.
      So, I've got to ask ... how does this explain Venus?
      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Atmospheres and gravity wells. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      So, I've got to ask ... how does this explain Venus?

      It's actually Earth, and not Venus, that's the abberation. The only reason Earth doesn't have a Venus-like atmosphere is that the moon's influence agitated the atmosphere enough for most of it to be stripped off.

      Venus has no moon, and so is stuck with a surface temperature at which lead gets mushy.

    3. Re:Atmospheres and gravity wells. by sunspot42 · · Score: 2

      Eh? The moon may have had an early influence on Earth's atmosphere, assuming it was once much closer to us than it is today, but its real tidal influence was - and remains - centered on our oceans. (Well, and on our crust.) The atmosphere barely notices the pull of lunar gravity - any effect from lunar gravity is swamped by all the energy it absorbs from incoming sunlight and heat (most of it solar-generated) radiating off the Earth's surface.

      One reason why the Earth doesn't have an atmosphere like that of Venus is because of photosynthesis. On Earth, organisms using photosynthesis to produce energy consumed great volumes of carbon dioxide and produced oxygen as a waste product. As a result of billions of years of this activity, CO2 is only a trace gas in our atmosphere, while O2 is the second largest component of it (and has also severely oxidized many of the metals in our planet's crust).

      On Venus, where there apparently aren't any (or at least, not very many) organisms conducting photosynthesis, the atmosphere is 95% CO2. CO2 has more mass than O2 and is a strong greenhouse gas, allowing Venus to retain a crushing shell of an atmosphere and maintain surface temperatures of 900 degrees Fahrenheit.

    4. Re:Atmospheres and gravity wells. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      One reason why the Earth doesn't have an atmosphere like that of Venus is because of photosynthesis. On Earth, organisms using photosynthesis to produce energy consumed great volumes of carbon dioxide and produced oxygen as a waste product.

      Photosynthesis indeed changed the chemical composition of the atmosphere, but was not responsible for the fact that Venus has a whole lot _more_ atmosphere. ...On further reading, I find several references that say that most of Earth's original CO2 atmosphere was locked in carbonate rocks, made possible by the presence of liquid water as a solvent. So, the lunar perturbation argument I'd heard was incorrect. My mistake.

    5. Re:Atmospheres and gravity wells. by sunspot42 · · Score: 2

      True. Lots of that carbonate rock is chalk though - the remains of ancient organisms. Coal and petroleum are other carbon rich substances within the Earth's crust of biologic origin.

      You're also seem to be running under the assumption that both planets started out with dense atmospheres comprised largely of CO2. It seems more likely - given the terrific amount of water here on Earth and the apparent presence of a significant amount of water ice on Mars - that hydrogen was a primary (if not the primary) component of the early atmospheres of these three terrestrial worlds. Much of that hydrogen would have been bound up with any available oxygen to form water (or water vapor).

      Volcanoes on Earth belch prodigious amounts of CO2. Indeed, they're the proposed mechanism for ending the "snowball" phases Earth apparently underwent earlier in its history. On Earth, that CO2 has been getting converted into oxygen for billions of years now, with its carbon largely bound up in the crust or inside of living organisms. On Venus though, there apparently haven't been many life forms around now for 500 million years at least, possibly not for billions. If Venus has been lifeless for most of its history, and assuming an average rate of volcanic outgassing comparable to the Earth's over that time, that's adds up to LOT of CO2.

      Venus also seems to have a tendency to resurface itself - the entire surface of the planet looks to be only 500 million years old. That might be because rocks are far stronger when uncontaminated by water, allowing the planet's crust to more effectively contain the liquid mantle beneath - at least, until the pressure builds to extremes. Then it could all come bursting through, much like the massive lava flows of Earth's past (such as the Deccan Traps), only on a global scale.

      One thing's for certain - nobody is opening a resort on Venus anytime soon.

  95. Reality and fantasy by tomem · · Score: 5, Informative

    This effect is real and well-known, but consequences are just beginning to be studied. It will be, after all, the first reversal during human history (self-written, at least). The field magnitude is believed to have dropped about a factor of two since biblical times, based on records of auroral observations, so it appears to be well under way at present. I don't have a handy reference, but I believe there was an article this past year in the Eos Transactions of the American Geophysical Union ( a weekly newsletter that can be found in most technical libraries).

    Some cynical views are expressed here, but it does seem prudent to investigate what our current knowledge would actually predict for effects. One thing sure is that the solar wind is not powerful enough to carry off a significant amount of atmosphere during the short duration (on a geologic time scale) of a reversal. But there may be many other effects, including disturbances of the upper atmosphere, possibly the ozone layer.

    To counterbalance the claims about Mars, it's important to note that Venus has no magnetic field at all, but has retained a very dense atmosphere. On the other hand there is almost no water present (left?) in the Venusian atmosphere.

    It does take human effort (i.e. funding) to look at these things seriously rather than speculatively.

    --
    ThosEM
    1. Re:Reality and fantasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a good point about G to the Oatse. I was thinking of going to Subway for Troll Tuesday, until you pointed that out.

      C to the izzex.

  96. Thank heaven for Hollywood by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

    This whole magnetic field going away thing sounds like it could be very harmful to life on earth. Fortunately for us, Hollywood predicted this incipient crisis, and has come up with the solution.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  97. No big deal, really by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 2, Informative

    The sun's magnetic poles switch every 11 years, which just happens to be current flipped. Flipped in last year in Feb.

    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast15feb _1 .htm

    --
    -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  98. fa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, this is actually a plus. If less radiation bombardment from the sun is diverted by the weaker magnetic field, the atmosphere will become thinner and temperatures will go down (violently). No more global warming!

  99. Nemesis by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is a sign of what is to come in the future - there will be magnetic pole shifts, earth axis will decline due to precession, weather changes, and to top all of this - the Sun will blow up in 4-5 billion years from now. So, shouldn't we start doing what is really important - just like in Ring World (Larry Niven) and Nemesis (Isaac Asimov), lets develop technology to move this planet around space, but we'll need really good working fusion power-plants to be constant source of energy and we'll need some sort of propulsion to move so much mass. Of-course Asimov's Nemesis shows that the best course of actions is to build huge space stations and move all folks up there, using the planets only as space anchors. These space stations will have to be able to survive any radiation, so they should be protected by artifficial magnetic fields. For now, let's just build a system of huge satellites around this planet that will serve as a radiation shield from the sun.

  100. Another academical BS by Ektanoor · · Score: 4, Informative

    We have just seen on /. some story about academical rubbish in the field of Physics. Now we read another bigger rubbish about Earth's magnetic poles. Yes, "bigger" because a Big Bang hoax theory may be still "speculative" as Big Bang itself is still a Big Question. Now that Earth will boil or that migrating birds will get disoriented is pure bullshit as there are tons of facts to show its fallacy. Let me note a few:

    The geological record shows lots of inversions occuring during Earth's History. But we are still alive don't we?

    For those who studied Mars, well studied it, know that Martian Oceans didn't boil up in a very very old past. Whatever happened there, created a global and massive movement of the hydrosphere some billion years after Mars was formed. I don't see how a magnetic pole inversion would help creating 1km deep canyons in a matter of hours or days. It is very probable that this happened long after the Martian Magnetic Pole turned off.

    If anyone cares to look at the Atlantic migrating birds, then he will note that some use both America and Africa to their travel North-South. Before Challenger's expedition (the ship, not the shuttle), people considered this as one of the evidences that these continents were much closer together in the past, as the zigzag pattern of migration turned into a nearly straight line.

    Some birds may highly depend on the magnetic field to travel. But birds have been travelling around earth for a period much longer than most modern mammals (note: marsupials and placentarians are very recent additions to Earth's biota). Have we seen major extinctions of birds during Earth's magnetic flip-flops?

    As far as I know, the Atlantic had plenty of water since Jurassic times. Challenger's expedition made several analysis of the magnetic properties of the bottom of the Atlantic. It showed a surface where the magnetic field changed direction sequently during the several millions of years, since Atlantic was formed.

    There is a theory that claims that for some millions of years, Earth had no magnetic field - during the megafrost that happened between Archaic and Cambric. I don't know if this is correct but, if so, it seems that Life lived and passed well enough this terrible period.

    Well, probably, any pole flip-flop may have its consequences on Earth and its inhabitants. But claiming it as the End of the World is the purest BS. This is Bad Science(TM) that many academics love to drop out over the masses. On one side they love to consider themselves as The Temple of Knowledge and save it from hoaxers, marginals, dissidents and heretics. On the other side they play no better than those clerics in Middle Ages, that at every sighting of a comet would cry over the crows "Armageddon! Armageddon is coming". Time to get more serious and sobber.

    1. Re:Another academical BS by cronus42 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can classify the big bang theory as speculative. From observed redshift in distant galaxies we know that our universe is expanding. It follows that if the universe is expanding now, then it had to have been "smaller" in the past. Since you can only get smaller for so long (14 billion years?) until you reach zero size, then the universe had a beginning. Thus the big bang.

      If anyone has a better theory, I'd like to hear it. (Please, no imaginary wanderings about universal omnipotent beings that snap their fingers and what not.)

      --
      Cronus
    2. Re:Another academical BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extra-universal omnipotent beings snap their fingers and poof! Instant Universe!

    3. Re:Another academical BS by cronus42 · · Score: 1


      Didn't I say no.... Nevermind....

      --
      Cronus
    4. Re:Another academical BS by AoT · · Score: 1

      just because there's no better theory doesn't make it any less speculative. use the heliocentric model of the solar system as an example. before copernicous thought it up the best theory we had was that the planets rotated around the sun. just cause no one is smart enough to come up with a new theory doesn't make the current one right.

      as for other possibilities; maybe the universe pulses in and out without accually colapsing in on itself or 'exploding'.

    5. Re:Another academical BS by cronus42 · · Score: 1


      Microwave background is pretty decent evidence that it was in fact collapsed, hot, and dense. If it didn't start out as a singularity, you then have to answer, what brought it back in after the last expansion. We can't account for enough matter to cause collapse. Even if we count estimated "dark matter" there isn't enough. Current evidence shows that the universe has an open structure and will expand forever. This theory is subject to change upon the introduction of new evidence; but that doesn't make it speculative, only deductive.

      --
      Cronus
    6. Re:Another academical BS by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      The enormous difference between the last magnetic shift and this one is that the planet wasn't covered in electronic devices before. A significant portion of our livelihood (food production, manufacturing, transportation, and pretty much all communications) are based on technologies that may be severely adversely affected by the weakening of the field. Yeah, life will persevere, but it doesn't mean everything's gonna be just rosy the entire time.

      Now it may be gradual enough that we won't have any trouble dealing with it, but it would be best to plan for the worst, wouldn't it?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    7. Re:Another academical BS by taphu · · Score: 1

      But claiming it as the End of the World is the purest BS.

      You are absolutly right.. except (gasp!) the article isn't saying anything of the sort.. duhh..

    8. Re:Another academical BS by AoT · · Score: 1

      whats the difference between speculative and deductive?

  101. Where are the Space Robots when we need them?... by jimberini · · Score: 1

    the force that protects us from deadly radiation bursts from outer space...

    This must be THE TERRIBLE SECRET OF SPACE!

  102. How about predicting my winning lotto numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh well, people believe anything. Will they flip? Hell if I know. Do I care? Not really. Scientists have a difficult predicting my weather for next week let alone an event that *should* have happened a 250k years ago and hasn't for a *million*. Right. Once you guys get my weather right, then come back and we'll talk.

    kthx

  103. Who would have thunk... by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    And to think I did a report on this as a high school freshman.

    But seriously, I seem to remember you can use geological record to track this shift across the ocean floors, which implies, at least to me, that the field didn't nessisarily weaken. I seriously doubt we'll have a huge problem here. Sure, your compass is gonna get screwed the hell up and you'll be buying a new one every few years until they stabilize, but hey...

    That said, how hard would it be to create a city sized magnetic field generator? Assuming on the off chance this guy is right and it will substantially weaken. Tie in a couple nuclear power plants an viole! (that's wa-la! in french ;) Blah, blah blah, radiation, blah blah blah,cancer... :p

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  104. Good to know but.. by [cx] · · Score: 1

    What the hell are we going to do about it?

    If there aren't any negative effects just watch and prepare for a nauseating ride. You'll be going down a highway south one day to your moms house and then voila you'll be going back north instantly without even realizing it.

    It's going to be hard to fly a plane when south is north and north is south!!
    THIS IS AN UNPARALLED CATASTROPHE

    WE NEED MILLIONS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO RESEARCH I WILL DO IT MYSELF AS MY NORTH/SOUTH PHILOSOPHY IS VERY SOLID LIKE A NEUTRON STAR

    -cx

    1. Re:Good to know but.. by cronus42 · · Score: 1

      Aren't Neutron stars fluid? ; )

      --
      Cronus
    2. Re:Good to know but.. by [cx] · · Score: 0

      Wow someone really DOES read my messages, maybe they are fluid I've never come close to one..
      What about you?
      But I remember learning that a teaspoon of a neutron star is the equivalent to a citys worth of cars in weight.

      [cx]

    3. Re:Good to know but.. by cronus42 · · Score: 1


      Dense yes, solid no. Neutron star material is degenerate matter. The matter is so compressed that the electrons are forced into the nucleus and everything (protons+electrons=neutrons) turns into neutrons. Neutrons have no repulsion to each other and are frictionless, yet cannot occupy the same space (like Bosons can in EBC). Neutron star degenerate matter is a superfluid. A very, very, dense superfluid.

      --
      Cronus
  105. IDEA! by gibbdog · · Score: 1, Funny

    What if one was to invent a compass that doesn't work, patent it, and then wait for the thousand or so years without a magnetic field...

    During this period where no compasses would work, sue the crap out of all of the compass manufacturers for patent violation!

    PROFIT!

  106. Complex more stable than simple, and why by texchanchan · · Score: 2

    "In many respects, a simpler culture is far more resilient than a complex one."

    Change this to "In some respects, a simpler culture may be more resilient than a complex one" and I might agree.

    Counterintuitive but true: Complex systems are harder to bring down than simple systems. Complex systems have more redundancy built in. If paths 1 through 10 are cut, you've got paths 11 through 5000 to use as alternates. If paths 1 through 7 are all you've got, you're out of luck.

    Complex systems have more individual breakdowns than simple systems because they have more components to break. But, they are less likely to collapse than simple systems.

    1. Re:Complex more stable than simple, and why by CircaX · · Score: 1

      But, you assume that complex systems by default have redundancy built in to them, which is not necessarily the case. As an example, consider something like an ordinary crt monitor. Is it complex system? Yes, there are hundreds of individual components in the monitor, each performing a crucial function. But if one resistor, capacitor or any other one of the components on the rather complex pcb happened to die, the whole monitor goes with it, and because of the complexity of the circuits, I wouldn't have any hope of fixing it.

      Most networks are designed with redundancy in mind, but there are a lot of systems that don't take redundancy into account. Also consider that a system doesn't even have to be electronic - complex social systems could suffer the same problems.

      --
      There's only 1 kinds of people in this world, those who understand balanced ternary, and those who don't.
    2. Re:Complex more stable than simple, and why by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Complex systems have more individual breakdowns than simple systems because they have more components to break. But, they are less likely to collapse than simple systems.

      I strongly suggest you read this. A quick summary is that complex societies are vulnerable because of the investment they need to make in creating the complexity and the overhead needed to maintain it. Complex societies can "fade away" when the overhead of maintaining the complexity does not generate a return; this happened to the Romans, whose decline took centuries, as a greater and greater proportion of the economy's capacity had to be diverted into maintaining complexity. In more recent times it happened to the Soviet Empire. Note that the collapse of these particular societies wasn't cataclysmic; the people were mostly OK, the political structures weren't.

      Or they can collapse abruptly because they have no slack built in... if you are a simple society with lots of people working on vanity projects like monumental architecture (say temples or cities or pyramids or whatever), then you have plenty of capacity that can be reassigned; it would be very easy to turn this mass of people into an army if you needed one, or detach some temporarily for disaster relief, or permanently to become farmers. It's all different sorts of manual labour anyway, so you can re-skill people quickly and easily. Any advanced society that abruptly and mysteriously disappeared probably did so because it faced a cataclysm it couldn't cope with.

      But in a complex and efficient society where everyone has a specialized role with hard-to-learn skills, there is no spare capacity and even if there was, you couldn't train those people fast enough to deal with a crisis. These societies collapse abruptly.

  107. Are they blaming CO2, CFCs, or EMI? by tz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    since it has to be something human beings are doing for anything annoying that happens to the earth, what activity are they going to blame for the pole flip?

  108. the article is a hollywood advertisement! by pezpunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    this seriously stinks of hollywood making up news as a blockbuster is about to be released. they did it before with all those asteroid movies and then again with all those mars movies a few years ago.

    from the article:
    Paramount's latest sci-fi thriller, The Core - directed by Englishman Jon Amiel, and starring Hilary Swank and Aaron Eckhart - depicts a world beset by just such a polar reversal, with radiation sweeping the planet.

    wtf??

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
    1. Re:the article is a hollywood advertisement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plot Summary for
      Core, The (2003)

      Scientists discover that the Earth's core is about to stop spinning. This will cause tremendous natural disasters, wiping out life as we know it. A team of scientists is recruited in a crash project to send a ship and bomb into the center of the Earth to prevent the catastrophe.

      Summary written by Jon Reeves {jreeves@imdb.com}

    2. Re:the article is a hollywood advertisement! by GoatEnigma · · Score: 1
      Actually that movie was being filmed on my campus for a couple of days last year. Between classes I ran over to check it out and see if they needed extras - when I found out what the movie premise was I walked away. Being a geoscientist, it would ruin any hopes of ever being published if someone saw me in such a ridiculous movie.

      Drill to the center of the earth? Bwahahahah!! The deepest drill hole ever made is 40,000 feet! That's not even half the thickness of the crust, and that took the Russians an entire decade to drill it! The crust hardly registers on a diagram showing the thickness of the earth....it would take a very long time to develop the technology to reach the core of the earth.

    3. Re:the article is a hollywood advertisement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the article:
      The solution, according to the film, to be released next year, involves scientists drilling into Earth's mantle to set off a nuclear blast that will halt the reversal.

      The proper application of a suitable quantity of high explosives... it isn't just for solving interpersonal problems anymore!

  109. Re:A lot of people don't grow food and they surviv by cosmo7 · · Score: 2

    Take a look at the early Industrial Revolution Cities in England. So overcrowded a plan was needed.
    The solution : criminalisation of poverty. That way the poor could be killed or transported.


    It was the industrial revolution, remember. People were brought into cities by enclosure of agricultural land and demand for labor from industry. Poverty did not increase, it was simply concentrated in the cities. There was no criminalization of poverty other than the workhouse. Transportation of convicts was largely to satisfy the demands of empire-building than to clean up England. There was no plan to deal with poverty; it wasn't really considered a problem. There were no people executed during the industrial revolution in England for the sole reason of poverty.

  110. With apologies to Mike Myers... by schlach · · Score: 5, Funny


    "So you see, Mr. Bigglesworth, I didn't want to destroy the entire frickin' world, but those Linux geeks really left me no choice. Reversing the earth's magnetic polarity was the only way it could be done without violating the DoJ consent agreement."

    "Let's see...Start...Programs...World Control Devices...Disasters...Microsoft...where the hell..?"

    "You seem to be trying to destroy the world. Would you like some help with that?"

    "Clippy! Oh thank god. Begin 'Gates-Plan-B'. So long, Mr. Stallman. I hope there's a GNU version of 'Microsoft 1000-year Radiation Shield .NET'.

    *maniacal laughter*

    1. Re:With apologies to Mike Myers... by Nefrayu · · Score: 2, Funny

      But wouldn't this mean that Clippy would start acting strange, perhaps even supporting a GPL? He is after all a paper clip (though endowed with AR {Artificial Retardedness}) and presumably made from ferrous materials.

      See - Just look what happens when you hold a magnet up to him!

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    2. Re:With apologies to Mike Myers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At that point I would think we would just kill the bastard.

    3. Re:With apologies to Mike Myers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apologies to Mike Myers?

      How about some apologies for the rest of us, too?

  111. Mmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How will this affect fridge magnets ?

  112. correlations with religion? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    how does this correlate with the various religions, and their predictions? people these days are always ranting about the "comming apocolypse", ect ect and the myan calander is set here to expire pretty soon.... in fact, alot of things end in the next few years. i'm not a "it's the end of the world!" type of person, but it seems like a hell of a coincidence. i can't imagine what would let people predict somthing like this, but if animals can "feel" an earthquake minutes before hand, a couple people over several thousand years might be able to "feel" the earth's magnetic field changing slooooowly.(and document it)

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:correlations with religion? by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      I am a Christian and I would have to say that this would not be the point of the end of the world, as a Christian I do believe the Bible and it says that the end will come like a thief in the the night, well this is something we know about so no this will not end the world, the end probably will not come for many century's (maybe millenniums)

    2. Re:correlations with religion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or tomorrow

  113. Save the gaiiiiiia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone seeing the same crap that this came out of from? Like, "Save the pandas! Save the whales! Cure breast cancer. I AM CAPTAIN PLANET!"

    I get tired of stuff like this. I just blow it off as more attempts to scare people into becoming a serious eco-maniac. Kinda like Dr. Aki Ross off of the Final Fantasy movie. "Save the gaia!"

    1. Re:Save the gaiiiiiia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the gaia looks anything like the one on captain planet... id fuck the gaia

  114. extinction threats by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    Actually, the more you study this stuff the more you worry that some of the them could pose a real threat. Diseases are obvious, as are volcanoes when you realize we haven't had a decent eruption since the early 19th Century... but that even a Tambola-level eruption is nothing compared to a supervolcano like Yellowstone.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  115. survival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The issue isn't so much the survival of our species ("human", sorry others). It is more than certain that
    a sustainable population will exist after almost any cosmic catastrophe the straight-to-dvd industry can dream up. The real question here, rather, is who will be privileged enough to be part of that sustained population.

    It may come down to economics, where only those with access to a radiation shelter with replenishable food and untainted water will survive. Or, maybe some parts of the earth will be less exposed, giving benefit to those lucky enough to live in a cool spot (I think we know their government better be well armed).

    But think of the possibility that a future humanoid race is descended entirely from either the US President and his Cabinet, evolving in underground bunkers for generations, or genetic mutants who have adapted to the harsh new atmosphere of the planet. What would comic book authors write about?

  116. YEAH, yeah, yeah. Whatever. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 4, Funny



    "You Global Warmer Nutties. I'll stick with our energy company President and his opinions, after all, he's been good so far. Where is the evidence that the world is warming up because of mankind!?! SHOW ME!"

    "AIIIIEEEEE!!!" (SUDDENLY CRUSHED UNDER TONS OF RESEARCH PAPERWORK GETTING DROPPED DIRECTLY ON TOP OF HIM)

    1. Re:YEAH, yeah, yeah. Whatever. by aminorex · · Score: 2

      Ah yes, an allusion to a vague and undefined
      massive body of research to support your
      unsupportable opinions. Very clever. I'm convinced -- not!

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    2. Re:YEAH, yeah, yeah. Whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is on topic because....?

    3. Re:YEAH, yeah, yeah. Whatever. by Isle · · Score: 2

      because it is true..

      The amount of research backing global warming is stunning. There have also been done research to prove the opposite (also succesfull research). It is always interesting when researchers can prove two different things. But since the researchers disproving global warming have mostly been hired by the oil industry, I thing the majority has the best credability.

    4. Re:YEAH, yeah, yeah. Whatever. by Rakarra · · Score: 2
      It is always interesting when researchers can prove two different things.

      Maybe they haven't actually proven anything, but merely come up with two competing theories, each of which has some evidence to back it up.

  117. Birds by Bri3D · · Score: 1

    Will bird's magnetic navigation be messed up? If it is, it will prove that birds have an "internal compass, " and that it is magnetic

  118. Re:Get real! [magnetization of the core] by caveat · · Score: 2

    the core of the earth is much too hot to sustain magnetization of iron.

    well, the core of the earth is very hot, true, but it's also under a /huge/ amount of pressure, ~360 GPa (52,214,400 psi) at the surface of the inner core. even though iron would vaporize at core temperatures under normal pressure, at core pressures it can exist as a stable crystalline structure, epsilon-Fe, that can possibly support magentization. there's actually a theory that the entire inner core may be one giant crystal, but i don't know exactly how that would generate a field or be able to reverse at random.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  119. Uh Oh... by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this gonna mess up the East and West Poles too?

  120. Re:I remember seeing this on sightings years ago.. by raindr · · Score: 1

    I've got that silly book!!! Was a interesting read pre year 2k but it's not even funny in the misinformation sense, Author is Richard W.Noone.

    --
    Things Are The Way They Are
  121. It IS possible... by bhsx · · Score: 3, Informative

    From Frazier's Bad Coriolis...
    Is it possible to detect the Earth's rotation in a draining sink?

    Yes, but it is very difficult. Because the Coriolis force is so small, one must go to extraordinary lengths to detect it. But, it has been done. You cannot use an ordinary sink for it lacks the requisite circular symmetry: its oval shape and off-center drain render any results suspect. Those who have succeeded used a smooth pan of about one meter in diameter with a very small hole in the center. A stopper (which could be removed from below so as to not introduce any spurious motion) blocked the hole while the pan was being filled with water. The water was then allowed to sit undisturbed for perhaps a week to let all of the motion die out which was introduced during filling. Then, the stopper was removed (from below). Because the hole was very small, the pan drained slowly indeed. This was necessary, because it takes hours before the tiny Coriolis force could develop sufficient deviation in the draining water for it to produce a circular flow. With these procedures, it was found that the rotation was always cyclonic.
    Taken from www.ems.psu.edu/~fraser/Bad/BadCoriolis.html

    --
    put the what in the where?
    1. Re:It IS possible... by Hays · · Score: 2

      So yeah reading these other pages I have no doubt that the coriolis effect is quite negligible in these situations...

      But, I find this guy's web page questionable

      Specifically, his whining about the commonly understood causes of cloud formation and greenhouse heating are extraordinarily nitpicky.

      I'm sure he's correct in saying that clouds form because the rate of evaporation for h20 falls below it's rate of condensation. But he says it's horrible to link this to the temperature of the medium (air) that contains the h20 because the h20 would act similarly no matter what medium it is in. Um.. so what, in this case since the temperature is even across the whole medium (air) what's wrong with this slight simplification?

      And worse is his whining over the analogy that the atmosphere works as a blanket to cause greenhouse effects. He says a blanket chiefly stops convection while an atmosphere enables it. (but a blanket also stops conduction and radiation effectively) He seems to miss the point that most people just associate a blanket with "something that traps heat" and I think that's just fine.

      Does the atmosphere trap radiation?
      No, the atmosphere absorbs radiation emitted by the Earth. But, upon being absorbed, the radiation has ceased to exist by having been transformed into the kinetic and potential energy of the molecules. The atmosphere cannot be said to have succeeded in trapping something that has ceased to exist.


      what!? that's rubbish. So what the energy has changed phase, it's still trapped! It's like saying a battery doesn't trap an electrical energy, because it's storing it as chemical energy.

      Does the atmosphere reradiate?
      One often hears the claim that the atmosphere absorbs radiation emitted by the Earth (correct) and then reradiates it back to Earth (false). The atmosphere radiates because it has a finite temperature, not because it received radiation. When the atmosphere emits radiation, it is not the same radiation (which ceased to exist upon being absorbed) as it received. The radiation absorbed and that emitted do not even have the same spectrum and certainly are not made up of the same photons. The term reradiate is a nonsense term which should never be used to explain anything.


      What?! so what if it's different photons at different wavelengths. The atmosphere is slowing the net flow of energy off of the earth's surface by absorbing radiation and returning some of that energy through radiation.

      The author takes an amazingly condescending tone towards anyone who would use these horrible analogies.

      And in fact, I think that his summary of this greenhouse issue is dead wrong

      "The surface of the Earth is warmer than it would be in the absence of an atmosphere because it receives energy from two sources: the Sun and the atmosphere. "

      Umm.. no. The atmosphere actually makes the daytime surface temperature much lower. It then helps maintain a nighttime temperature.

      Read this guy's page and the faq's associated with them and you can see the amazing logical disconnects he makes to form some of his arguments.

  122. Re: ooh! a religious post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh really. I'd like to meet your god. In my 22 years I've only seen proof that the universe can be compared to a big computer simulation in which there is only one outcome. Here's my side of the argument:

    1. Everything that happens is based on how things were originally situated (at the big bang or however it started).

    2. The thoughts in your head, including the god thing, are chemical reactions in a very small part of that system that happened to be in a certain state when the system started.

    3. Time, which is why we only see part of this system instead of the whole thing at once, is a byproduct of inertia which is a byproduct of mass which is a byproduct of matter. Without matter the system would never change, thus making it impossible to measure time without a reference point (clock) outside the system.

    4. Quantum theory, referring to a finite number of states in which a part of the system (such as an electron) can exist, can be taken as evidence that the system is actually a vast simulation. If there are a finite number of places and times in which matter can exist, then the system could be perfectly represented in a finite (although extremely large) amount of computer memory.

    That's my point of view. Yes, I thought of #4 after conusming a large amount of Substances. Who else wants to feed the troll?

  123. 20 ways the world could end by jsse · · Score: 2

    This has already been covered in DISCOVER Vol. 21 No. 10 (October 2000), among the others 19 ways the world could end:

    http://www.ldolphin.org/twentyways.html

  124. Didn't Dirk Pitt save us from this? by sconeu · · Score: 0, Troll

    I thought Dirk Pitt saved us from this already?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  125. Titan's atmosphere by csmiller · · Score: 1
    Whether a planet/moon can support an atmosphere, its dependant on whether the gas velocity is greater than the object's escape velocity.

    The gas velocity is depedant on the Ideal gas law, here solved for velocity.
    v = sqrt(3 R T / M )

    where v is the velocity,
    R the Ideal Gas constant, (0.08206 L atm / kg Kelven),
    T the surface temperture in Kelvin,
    and M the molar mass ( 2 * 16 for oxygen, 12 + 2*x16 = 44 for CO2 )

    and the escape velocity is v = sqrt(2 Ga M/R)
    where; Gc is Newton's constant ( 6.6715 E - 11,
    M the mass of the Object,
    R the surface velocity.

    Basicaly, this means the larger (and cooler) an object is, the more atmosphere it can support.
    Incidently, once an object gets an atmosphere, the surface temprature (sun side), is likely to be cooler, allowing more of an atmosphere to be supported.
    Solving for Titan, and Mars are left as an exersize for the interested reader, Nine planets will give the remaining values needed

    --
    It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --- Albert Einstein
  126. Migrate to Space!! by lunadude · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nuf said.

  127. Everything you know is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Just bear with me for a minute...this will sound totally stupid:

    The shift in the magnetic fields is being artifically sped up by a secret operation by the united states government. They are forcing the shift through an artificial process being carried out in the Aleutian Islands off the coast of Alaska. I do not know the technical details, but they are using some type of equipment to send waves into the core of the earth.

    This is not some joke or troll post. Clearly you don't believe me, partially because I am posting as AC and for the fact that it sounds totally outrageous, and I clearly will be modded down. But I am posting this anyway so that history will show that someone did know about this while it was happenning.

    1. Re:Everything you know is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess.. the aliens told you this when they beamed you up to their ship for cocktails...

    2. Re:Everything you know is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      PhysicsGenius, is that you?

    3. Re:Everything you know is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Authenticated message 01AB56F920.FFF

      Agent W

      Spin the bottle has been compromised. Locate leaky barrel and put a cork it. All necessary corking measures authorized to prevent further spillage. Report back after mop up.

    4. Re:Everything you know is wrong by Mr.+Asdf · · Score: 1

      The shift in the magnetic fields is being artifically sped up by a secret operation by the united states government.

      a statement like this would be easy to prove if you are "in the know", yet impossible to disprove (regardless of how unlikely it seems). thus, these types of statements will be completely disregarded unless further information is given. so, if you really do have inside information, then please at least share the motive.

    5. Re:Everything you know is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Perhaps you're referring to this.

    6. Re:Everything you know is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Research HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project - you know, all those antennas in Alaska)...out own government is attempting to find the resonance frequency of the ionosphere. A science friend of mine heard some recordings of the scientists responsible for this creation - he says they were psychotic, and had no idea (nor did they care) what they are actually doing with this project, nor the consequences.
      Whether it be weather control, mind control, or seeking to shatter the ionosphere (hehe), or maybe just accelerating a pole shift, HAARP is bad news.
      peace,
      -ocean59

    7. Re:Everything you know is wrong by Adam9 · · Score: 2

      I did policy debate for 4 years in high school and last year the resolution was to limit the use of weapons of mass destruction. My affirmative plan (a plan to support the resolution) was to disable the harmful device in HAARP which is better known as the Eastlund patent. [Now to be on topic] Sure enough, our 4th advantage was to prevent reversal of the poles. I'll post pieces of the evidence I used in the tournaments.

      In a northern forest of Alaska, a group of antennas stand tall. What looks
      like a cable television station is really the Pentagon's High-frequency
      Active Auroral Research Program, also known as HAARP. Capable of sending out
      a large electromagnetic beam into our ionosphere, it can be targeted back to
      Earth with its "virtual" mirrors and lenses in a strategic fashion. When
      completed in 2002, it will have 360 antennas together reaching 1.7 gigawatts
      of power.

      Environmental Online, 1997 [By Tracey C. Rembert, "Discordant HAARP: The Air
      Force is Preparing to Militarize the Ionosphere-With Electrifying Results",
      January-February, Volume VIII, Number 1,
      http://www.emagazine.com/january-february_1997/0 197currhaarp.html]

      In a black spruce forest north of Alaska's Wrangell-St. Elias National Park, a bristling array of antennas rises into the air. It looks like a cable television station, but it's something far more ominous: the military's semi-secret High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), designed to give the Pentagon strategic control over the upper atmosphere. HAARP, slated for final completion in 2002, sends out a focused and steerable electromagnetic (EM) beam that can superheat and actually lift sections of the ionosphere--the electrically charged upper layer of our atmosphere lying 40 to 500 miles above the Earth's surface. The EM waves are targeted to bounce back to Earth from "virtual" mirrors and lenses, created by warming specific areas of the ionosphere until they produce a flat or curved shape, capable of strategically redirecting significant amounts of electromagnetic energy.

      Stage III of Eastlund's patent is a considerable expansion incorporating HAARP's military defense goals: 360 antennas together reaching 1.7 gigawatts (1,700,000,000 watts) of power, enabling HAARP to alter a significant portion of the ionosphere, and create a virtual mirror theoretically capable of astounding defensive feats.

      1AC

      The military has admitted that they will use HAARP as a weapon

      Begich and Manning, 95 [Dr. Nick and Jeane, (independent scientists studying HAARP) Nick - Doctor of physics from the Open International Institute; Jeane - Member of the Auckland Institute, Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, p. 127]

      Oblique HF heating is useful for over-the-horizon radar, as well as for many of the other uses desired by the military. We talk about the steering elsewhere, when discussing the use of the HAARP transmitter as the military's long sought after radio frequency radiation weapon. This type of use was first publicly disclosed by an Air Force captain who was reporting on new technologies in a military conference in 1984.

      HAARP has the ability to kill entire cities with radiation

      Smith, 98 [Jerry E., author of "HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy", pg. 9-12, http://www.blazing-trails.com/jesmith/ha/haarpzero .php3]

      One might be able to use this transmitter to do more than merely reshape the ionosphere. What if it could "burn" holes into the protective layer? That would allow deadly radiation from outer space to pour through, searing the earth. You could release a burst of radiation over a target as deadly as a nuclear bomb. There would be no explosion, no damage to buildings and equipment. Yet, every living thing within the area exposed would be dead or dying.

      This is the true story of one military program that pretends to be a "harmless" civilian research project. It is called HAARP. HAARP is not science fiction. It is a potentially deadly reality. When completed it will be the world's largest radio frequency transmitter.

      The experimenters of HAARP admit that they don't know what will happen when HAARP is activated at the next stage

      Begich and Manning, 95 [Dr. Nick and Jeane, (independent scientists studying HAARP) Nick - Doctor of physics from the Open International Institute; Jeane - Member of the Auckland Institute, Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, p. 57-58]

      If the reporter digs a bit farther, however, he or she would find a paper from Penn State, for example. It shows a graph of the hierarchy of the thresholds that increasing input of radio frequency (RF) power makes in the ionosphere. Heating comes first, then "parametric instabilities and stimulated electromagnetic radiation". Pump in more RF power and you accelerate electrons until the air glows. The next threshold is "shock fronts and stimulated ionization". The Penn State experimenters proudly say they don't know what will happen when the new super powerful HAARP instrument drives the effects past a new threshold.
      1AC

      Thus we present the following plan,

      The United States federal government will establish a foreign policy significantly limiting the use of weapons of mass destruction by acting through Congress to remove Dr. Bernard Eastlund's U.S. Patent #4,686,605 from the High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program.

      Advantage 4: Pole Shift

      The creators of HAARP intended to create a "runaway" effect that would cross into a new energy threshold

      Begich and Manning, 95 [Dr. Nick and Jeane, (independent scientists studying HAARP) Nick - Doctor of physics from the Open International Institute; Jeane - Member of the Auckland Institute, Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, p. 18]

      In documents the HAARP planners put together in 1990 they say that they were intentionally trying to get a "runaway" effect on the ionosphere. This effect was new and would represent an energy threshold not yet reached with these kinds of military tools. The document said "...that at the highest HF (high frequency) powers available in the West, the instabilities commonly studied are approaching their maximum RF (radio frequency) energy dissipative capability, beyond which the plasma processes will 'runaway' until the next limiting factor is reached."

      If energy like this continues to be released it will trigger a pole shift

      Begich and Manning, 95 [Dr. Nick and Jeane, (independent scientists studying HAARP) Nick - Doctor of physics from the Open International Institute; Jeane - Member of the Auckland Institute, Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, p. 77]

      The Soviets considered the impact of electromagnetic "smog" on living organisms. They concluded that because living organisms evolved under the influence of the Earth's micropulsations in the magnetic field, changes in these pulsations might alter fundamental body rhythms, including the rate that DNA replicates. From the Soviet perspective, electromagnetic pulses can influence everything from health to behavior. Russian scientists are also concerned that continued increases in electromagnetic radiations could contribute to a premature and cataclysmic reversal or position shift of Earth's poles.

      1AC

      The pole shift caused by HAARP will lead to GLOBAL EXTINCTION

      Smith, 98 [Jerry E., author of "HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy", pg. 109-110]

      The May 1992 issue of Discovery Magazine discussed what might result from disrupting the Earth's internal "dynamo" and altering the upper atmospheres magnetic belts, saying; HAARP could create a premature reversal of the magnetic poles

      During a reversal of the magnetic pole the strength of the Earth's magnetic field would collapse, then rebuild in the opposite polarity. During the period of collapse and rebirth of the field, the Earth would be without the protection of the magnetosphere, the only living things to survive would be deep in the earth or the sea. Humanity, and virtually all species that live exposed to the sky would be wiped out by the flood of hard radiation from the sun and space. Changes in the Earth's interior are known to affect the magnetosphere. If the reversal is the cause of the magnetosphere affecting the interior, then ignorant or intentional misuse of HAARP has the potential to virtually wipe out life on Earth.

  128. does that word mean what you think it means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to wonder what definition of "feasible" you're using that includes a project requiring "the present power output of all electrical plants on the planet over a decade" and more copper cable than has ever existed.

    1. Re:does that word mean what you think it means? by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have to wonder what definition of "feasible" you're using that includes a project requiring "the present power output of all electrical plants on the planet over a decade" and more copper cable than has ever existed.

      Something that we could conceivably do within 50 years if we decided we really wanted to (along the lines of the Manhattan Project).

      As opposed to, say, building a Dyson Sphere or some other project that requires either vastly more resources than are available, or materials that we have no idea to produce.

  129. Reversals may only take weeks/months by CecilSagehen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The conventional wisdom is that the actual reversal takes centuries, but some new evidence has geologists wondering if it can happen much more quickly, like weeks. We see old magnetic fields frozen in cooled lava, sometimes pointing north, sometimes south. In the last few years, while studying a ~10 million year old basalt flow in the Steens Mountain, Oregon, researchers think they have found a flow that solidified while a reversal was taking place. The bottom portion of the flow points one way, then the orientation gradually changes until the top (middle? -- last to cool) points the other way. We have a pretty good handle on how fast lava cools, and that whole event should only have lasted several weeks. Hard to believe but no one has come up with a great alternative explanation yet. So just may happen VERY quickly when it hits the tipping point. Yet another reason to ask for a GPS for Christmas!

  130. Double Nope by mstorer3772 · · Score: 1

    A thatched roof is going to catch quite a few UV rays too. You're pretty much buggered either way on the whole "x-ray/gama-ray" end of things, but corrogated (SP?) aluminum isn't that hard to come by, even in some third world country. And I'd be suprised if there weren't some relatively common primitive building material that would work. Adobe maybe? You know, mud.

    --
    Fooz Meister
    1. Re:Double Nope by FirstOne · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "A thatched roof is going to catch quite a few UV rays too. You're pretty much buggered either way on the whole "x-ray/gama-ray" end of things, but corrogated (SP?) aluminum isn't that hard to come by, even in some third world country. And I'd be suprised if there weren't some relatively common primitive building material that would work. Adobe maybe? You know, mud."

      I wouldn't worry.

      Earth's magnetic fields do not absorb ionized radiation. They deflect it, to the magnetic poles. I.E. Same amount of energy hitting the planet all the time. In today's world, most of the ionized particles are deflected and concentrated to the polar regions. Net effect of a polar shift, atmosphere stays the same size. If anything earth's magnetic fields act like a giant vacuum cleaner, sucking up charged particles from 5 to 10 times the earths diameter. If the field goes away, no more vacuum cleaner effect, which results in LESS ionized particles hitting earth. (Global cooling, perhaps???)

      We've had radar stations and plenty of other sensitive electronics in the polar regions for a long time. Even at concentrated radiation levels, most of it still doesn't get through our atmosphere (14.7PSI). 14.7 PSI is roughly equivilent to a 32 foot/~10 meter column of water. Plenty of shielding.

    2. Re:Double Nope by Alan_Exs · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wh3r3 can I get the nocd key for Adobe roof? thx D00d

    3. Re:Double Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Global cooling, perhaps???)

      You mean, we must purchase SUVs just to stay alive?!?!?!

  131. Species Depletion and Major Enivronmental Shifts by irritating+environme · · Score: 1

    In previous occurrences of magnetic pole shifting, there likely would have been a very wide variety of species of animals and plants throughout the world. The populations of these species would be quite large too.

    These days the footprint of six billion humans plus the space devoted to specialized species of grains and grazing animals means that there aren't as many animals and plants in the food chain. I always considered this the true danger from global warming since we are combining it with species extinctions and that could threaten food heirarchies around the world

    A magnetic pole reversal might be more catastrophic than significant global warming. And there probably isn't anything we could do.

    Humans could paradoxically always move into space...

    --


    Hey, I'm just your average shit and piss factory.
  132. We may not die but... by MarvinMouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Our technology will have to undergo a severe shift.

    I am surprised no one has commented on the fact that the magnetic fields around earth protect the Earth from radiation that _damages_ electronics. When the sun has a solar flare, satellites are knocked out by the radiation. The only reason computers on the planet aren't is because the magnetic fields deflect enough of the radiation to make it harmless to electronics.

    Yet, if we don't have a magnetic field to deflect the radiation, we end up with a completely different problem. A solar flare will likely be able to take out a majority of our satellites at first (if they aren't shielded, which most aren't to the degree needed.) Then with no field at all, the electronics on the planet are threatened by the radiation.

    Likely very little will happen to us (considering it's just EM radiation mostly, and not radioactive isotopes.) But, There will definitely be a shift in computer construction towards better shielded designs. (because if there isn't, then... well, there won't be any computers working at all.)

    --
    ~ kjrose
  133. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  134. Newsflashes! by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny
    In related news, early trading in overseas markets shows the stock prices of map and textbook publishers have risen, while investors seem to have less trust in compass manufacturers. As paper and human skin can stop some types of radiation, the value of paper manufacturers and cloning companies also rose. Unemployment rates decreased due to a sudden increase in people applying to work in mining industries, bowling alleys, and within the shielding of the world's nuclear plants.

    Environmentalists point out that the weakening magnetic field and atmospheric heating over the past 200 years coincide with, and is obviously caused by, an increase in evil industrialism. Protest marches are planned from New York south to Washington DC, then south to New York.

    California legislators met in emergency session today and passed new automobile magnetic emission legislation. The magnetic fields of automobiles are now required to be aligned with the Earth's magnetic field and of opposite polarity so as to stress the existing magnetic generator to stay in the present configuration. Experts estimate it will only cost $200 per car and safety is worth the investment.

    Australia celebrated for one hour, then began studying how to make use of their new domination of the highly successful Northern Hemisphere. Chinese leaders met to consider what to ignore next.

    In medical news, herbal supplement manufacturers point out that natural iron supplements contain particles which experienced past natural reversals, and thus will train your body to help it deal with future changes.

    Entertainers point out that they've been working for decades under hot, bright, lights and filming around the world until they don't know which way is up. This hasn't changed them in the least, and they're still just ordinary human beings like you or me, stated a spokesperson for Gardeners To The Stars, makers of fine gardening products just like the assistants to the gardeners of the Stars use but available at quality discount stores near you.

    Tomorrow's weather forecast is for increasing temperatures to one-hundredth of a degree higher than yesterday. A gentle wind from the sunrise direction will change to stronger gusty winds from sunriseport, and chance of scattered thunderstorm shields in the area. As always, when a thunderstorm is within view with the sun behind it, take the kids outside to play in natural air and rain until the storm has passed and it is time to seal the house up again.

    In sports news: The World Championship of Bowling in Cleveland today was won by a newcomer from Kenya for the third year in a row. He believes his country has produces so many winners because their bowling alley construction program placed them deeper than other countries did. Sources say that oxygen enrichment of some national bowling training facilities is widely rumored but not yet proven.

    Our next update will be in three hours, when your sundial is a the midpoint. You should turn off your generator until then and set your laser receiver in standby mode.

    This has been a Coherent News Network production, the fastest news ever bounced off the fluorescent sky.

  135. NASA doesn't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Some people worry that during magnetic reversals the Earth would receive a higher dosage of high-energy ions and electrons ("radiation" in common terms), which might affect us and any living creatures on Earth. This is not so. Even today, the magnetic shield is not effective near the magnetic poles, yet the radiation received there on the ground is only slightly higher than anywhere else. The reason is that our main shield against such particles is not the magnetic field of the Earth but the atmosphere, equivalent to some 10 feet of concrete." - nasa

  136. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  137. Vesilind's Laws of Experimentation: by bopo · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. If reproducibility may be a problem, conduct the test only once.
    2. If a straight line fit is required, obtain only two data points.

    --
    "Understand you're having a little Jimmy Page trouble."
  138. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  139. Personally I can't wait... by greenskyx · · Score: 1

    To be living in the Southern hemisphere. I just don't want to have to tip my world map upside down because it will be a lot harder to read that way....

  140. GPS Satellites are beyond the ionosphere by Bob+Loblaw · · Score: 1

    They will experience a mild increase in radiation. I believe that they are already flying through the Van Allan Belts which give them a good dose each orbit. There are kept in the possition they are due to the magnetic field so they may even get less radiation then they normally do.

    Geostationary satellites (the vast majority of communication satellites) are even farther out still and won't even notice.

    The EM noise and damping caused by the sun's radiation hitting our magnetic field and atmosphere make communication to GEO *harder*. If neither were around we would have better communication (for course we wouldn't be around though).

    1. Re:GPS Satellites are beyond the ionosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. I can't believe someone didn't point this out earlier. I guess linked article relied on a hollywood screenwriter for their scientific guidance.

  141. or better yet: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1- Anoy everyone with running gags and/or in-jokes on /.
    2- Ask for a hefty randsome to stop
    3- Profit
    (4- Get labeled a terrorist by Ashcroft and be thrown in jail)

  142. worse than y2k? by mrsmalkav · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Woo boy. I can't wait till management hears about this one. And here I thought all that last minute y2k preparation was bad... How many people are gonna be moving to the hills in anticipation of the all-out hell that will come when the swallows and wildebeests go nutty and try to take over the world.

    Hmm... I wonder if the programmers from the 70s had enough foresight to incorporate some protection against poleshift and excessive radiation.... I can't wait till someone starts marketing tinfoil shell casemods and making bank. "No really! You really really need it! Save your data! Can withstand up to one boiled atmosphere!"

  143. Cybermen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't there a Doctor Who where the Cybermen flip the magnetic poles as a prelude to an invasion, complete with mind control and borg-like conversions?

    I trust our greatest thinkers and leaders have already taken this into account.

  144. D'oh by Myuu · · Score: 2

    "So, Bart was actually right, and not Lisa for once.."

    That pissed me off, I was taking a physics test and that question was on there. For some reason I remembered that episode of the Simpsons, and answered accordingly citing the Simpsons as the reason for my answer.

    I of course was wrong, but I cracked my teacher up (she is an anime freak so thats why I could cite them as evidance)

    --

    forget it.
    1. Re:D'oh by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That pissed me off, I was taking a physics test and that question was on there. For some reason I remembered that episode of the Simpsons, and answered accordingly citing the Simpsons as the reason for my answer. I of course was wrong

      Suggestion: study the book, not cartoons. I am afraid the next generation is going to build a manned Mars mission based on cartoons. Then again, the bouncey Pathfinder airbag thing looked like something out of cartoons.

      Who knows, ACME might be still selling giant magnets to fix the Earth when it's field zarks out.

    2. Re:D'oh by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      Suggestion: study the book, not cartoons.

      It's more worrying than just cartoons. There are many glaring errors in movies, especially regarding historical events. In the absence of contary personal experience, your own mind automatically assumes that's what happened. That's how we learn. There's quite a large number of people who probably believe that (for example) the USA was the only side fighting the Nazis in WW2, or William Wallace slept with a princess that would have been only 6-7 years old while he was around!

    3. Re:D'oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's quite a large number of people who probably believe that (for example) the USA was the only side fighting the Nazis in WW2

      Reminds me of "things you didn't know about Russia" jokes I read in a British comic/magazine. One of them was something like "Britain and Germany weren't the only countries to fight in World War II; Russia actually came third, after Britain and the USA."

      Er, well it amused me anyway and that made me thing of it...

  145. In addition to many species of migrating animals.. by pzilla · · Score: 1

    In addition, many species of migrating animals and birds - from swallows to wildebeests - rely on innate abilities to track Earth's magnetic field. Their fates are impossible to gauge.

    No! What about the migration of swallow carring coconuts?

    --

    --
    Karma is overrated, whoring is ok.
  146. It's decreasing, not reversing by young-earth · · Score: 2

    In point of fact, what's being observed is that the magnetic field is declining in strength. It's an inferrence that it will reverse. There are contrary opinions, such as those that show that the energy being lost is not being stored in quadrapoles, octopoles, and so on.

    I realize most readers of /. are unwilling to consider reading this paper due to where it's published, but if you are willing to evaluate a paper by a PhD with many patents from working at Sandia Labs, try reading this paper. It shows how the magnetic field is declining and not storing this energy in the non-dipole moments.

    1. Re:It's decreasing, not reversing by young-earth · · Score: 2

      Oops the link didn't make it in there, here it is

  147. Well, we'll have to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reconfigure our monitors! well, those of us with CRTs, that is. the magnetic field has an effect, and if it switches, so will we have to.

  148. Humans are to blame by LadyLucky · · Score: 2
    See, we go and label the north pole of a magnet that pole which points to the northern pole of the globe. The inveitable consequence of this is of course that the north pole is a magnetic south pole.

    Many thousands of years of calling the pole at the north of the globe a north pole, and it has had enough, and migrating south, where it belongs.

    --
    dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
  149. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  150. Emergency Resolution by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1
    Human electromagnetic activity is overwhelming the Earth's magnetic field, and will soon result in its extinction, or even reversal. We have to drastically cut back on our use of electric current, or the Earth could be permanently damaged, say an internation team of scientists. They have drafted an emergency resolution calling for a 75% reduction in ampere usage over 5 years.

    Western industrialized countries are complaining that this is unfair, since most of the magnetic field produced from Human activity comes from the developing world, due to the wide spread use of crude coils and inefficient motors.

    Advocates for the poor point out that developing countries need refrigeration to combat disease, and refrigerators require current with present day technology.

    "We have no choice", says a spokesperson for the scientists. "We either cut way back on our use of electricity now, or doom our grandchildren to be roasted by the sun."

  151. Important Discovery from Headline by Dfiant · · Score: 1

    If I'd known I could've just said "I'm about to" to that age old question of "When are you going to take the trash out?" and mean 1,000 years, I'd have used it about 1,000 years ago!

  152. Santa = Magic (or simply GPS) by NSupremo · · Score: 1

    Nice overrated comment you got there.

    As usual. Some really dumb comment is ranked above all others in a non-comedy related thread where there is nothing to make fun of.

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._Election_co ntroversies_and_irregularities
  153. You are an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SUV. Fuck you asshole.

  154. Re:Business model - the MS bug by Dan-DAFC · · Score: 1

    Consultant: It involved a near global catastrophy which occured aroung the 19th century. Only the speedy responce by excellent programmers saved civilisation.

    I didn't know that. You'd have thought that they'd have learned from that and not let it happen again in the 20th century.

    --
    Suck figs.
  155. YES!!! by teslatug · · Score: 2

    I finally have a valid excuse for my hopelessly flawed sense of direction.

  156. From the article; by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    "of our descendants to bursting point, though such limitations do not worry film scriptwriters. Paramount's latest sci-fi thriller, The Core - directed by Englishman Jon Amiel, and starring Hilary Swank and Aaron Eckhart - depicts a world beset by just such a polar reversal, with radiation sweeping the planet.

    The solution, according to the film, to be released next year, involves scientists drilling into Earth's mantle to set off a nuclear blast that will halt the reversal."

    Wow, nukes again. Those puppies are *so* useful!
    Stopping asteroids, stopping the earths magnetic field from shifting, what next? Save the world from impending ecological disaster by nuking antarctica? Will wonders never cease?

    Everyone should have one! :o)

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  157. Let's be realistic by linux2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...and could disappear over the next 1,000 years.

    Exactly what will happen when Earth's magnetic field disappears ... is also difficult to assess. Compasses would point to the wrong pole - a minor inconvenience.

    Not my compass! My compass is made of metal and plastic; it will long since have biodegraded 1,000 years from now. Why would people in the year 3000 still be making compasses exactly the way we do today?
    More importantly, low-orbiting satellites would be exposed to electromagnetic batterings, wrecking them.
    You mean today's low-orbiting satellites? Do you really think they have enough fuel to maintain orbit-path error correction for the next 1,000 years? All the satellites we have today will be gone by then! Humanity will have replaced them with far cooler technology that we cannot even dream of today.
    In addition, many species of migrating animals and birds - from swallows to wildebeests - rely on innate abilities to track Earth's magnetic field. Their fates are impossible to gauge.
    Oh my God! Since the animals will be exactly the way they are today 1,000 years from now, they are doomed! Since animals can never adapt to their natural environment generation after generation. At the very least, adaptation takes time, and animals only have 1,000 years to do it! This is horrible!

    Time now for some math.

    Suppose a swallow is born 500 years from now. It's life span is what, 2-3 years? At the beginning of its life, the earth's magnetic strength is 0.5 as strong as it is today (500 years left/1000). By the end of the swallow's life it is 0.497 as strong (497 years left/1000), for a 0.6% change in magnetic field strength during the course of it's entire life. Less than one percent! Yeah, I think a swallow can deal with that.

    If you are born with something (sound, energy, happiness, whatever) that is weaker than it was 1000 years ago, you do not even notice. It's that way all your life, and you cope with it. You never even consider it.

    1. Re:Let's be realistic by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      If you are born with something (sound, energy, happiness, whatever) that is weaker than it was 1000 years ago, you do not even notice. It's that way all your life, and you cope with it. You never even consider it.

      I think the concern was more due to the fact that some species of birds use the Earth's magnetic field to determine their migration patterns. If the field were non-existant or reversed they would not be able to navigate. It wouldn't seem odd to the bird, perhaps, but it would have all that fancy magnetic-field-tracking gear that wouldn't be working right.

      So it isn't a complete non-issue for the reasons that you are thinking.

      Still, the general consensus is that the Earth's field has changed many times in the past - maybe 100 times since birds have flown on the Earth. So obviously it can't be all that devastating to them. Maybe a few species will die out, or maybe not...

  158. Re:Highly suspicious - yes your think'n is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definition of Science: The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena. Such activities restricted to a class of natural phenomena. Such activities applied to an object of inquiry or study. === Perhaps you don't remember the story of the "natural phenomena" that was at the heart of the Blair Witch - that there was a supposed witch who had certain powers (such as the ability to float above the ground). Perhaps you don't remember the fact that the students were exploring to STUDY this phenomena. Perhaps you don't remember that the hype was leaked as if it was a REAL story on the internet, prior to the movie being released. Perhaps you don't realize that HUMANS are part of NATURE, and therefore the study of HUMANS (even those who are supposed witches) is a science. Perhaps you are a moron.

  159. suggestions by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

    reality

    Buy some corning stock.

    \reality

    Cool. Northern lights on the beach. Gimme another beer.

  160. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel more than volcanoes by js7a · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Volcanic activity has fucked with the atmosphere of the planet more than man ever will.

    Wrong.

  161. Decipher by Builder · · Score: 1

    This was the premise of a book titled Decipher. Well, one of the premises. Check it out at Amazon

    This is the same author who wrote the screenplay of 51st State / Formula 51 (depending on where you live)

  162. If the computers went down the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    economy would crash in 72-96 hours. It is NOT POSSIBLE to continue our monetary and banking system as it stands now without computers. In reality more than 50% of the money in the banks is electronic numbers and does not exist in reality. If the computers really went POOF, that money would go POOF as well. How quickly do you think our infrastucture would fail ? How fast do you think we could switch back to a localized barter system ? How would we ship food ? Billions would die, as the medical system crumbled. Cities would become death traps. Do you really think everyone went nuts over Y2K because nothing could actually happen. It turned out to be a non-event, but the samepotential exists again :(

  163. Yep, I did it. by fishexe · · Score: 1

    You may send me to my room if you like.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  164. Re:Highly suspicious - yes your think'n is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    supposed witch who had certain powers (such as the ability to float above the ground)

    Got equations?

    Thought not.

    Face it, the original poster blew it by equating science with The Blair Witch. Hype, sure. But not science. The movies about tall building burning, asteroids hitting the planet, airplanes crashing have more science than 'its an alledged witch'.

  165. Re:Highly suspicious - yes your think'n is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh? Are you saying that the study of earth's mysteries and phenomena are not science? Are you implying that investigating the unknown is not science? Are you saying that you need "equations" to prove a hypothesis, which is what the kids in Blair Witch set out to do? Nice try, but equations aren't required for science, and equations don't necessarily mean science. For instance, you = moron. But that's not science. that's obvious.

  166. So much for Boy Scouts by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Guess it's time to burn my orienteering merit badge.

    --
    On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
  167. Hmm... climate change cause anyone? by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    Seriously, on a sheer magnitude scale, which has greater potential to change global climate patterns? Human CO2 production or a significant change in solar radiation? (Not to mention changes in seismic activity resulting from the same fluctuations in the earth's molten core..) The earth is not exactly a stable system.

  168. And during testing they killed Kenny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those BASTARDS!!!!!

  169. Magnetic Field info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are some interesting tidbits about the earth's field:

    * looks like it takes about 1-5 thousand years to flip.

    * The current field is still twice as large as the best estimate of the average field (for the last 300 million years)

    * We had an "excursion" 40 thousand years ago where the field went close to 0. It's name the "Laschamp event" after where it was first found.

    * We aren't really "due" for another reversal anytime soon. The field flipping is a highly random process. There is a period in the Cretaceous were the field didn't flip for (errr I forget the exact time) some 60 million years.

    * We had better start drilling that hole in the earth to put the nuke down into the >>> mantle to stop the core for going kooky.

    * We never landed on the moon :)

    -k

  170. In other News.. by mjolnir_ · · Score: 1

    A spokesperson for the strong nuclear force confirmed today that the elemental constant was also considering a 'flip.' Consequences to industrialialized nations due to climate changes and possible universe-wide subatomic disruption will 'require further study.'

    Gravity denied any connections to the magnetic, strong, or weak forces.

  171. Santa Clause by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    So my question is, what is Santa going to do if the north pole moves?

    --
    -- $G
  172. Re:Highly suspicious - yes your think'n is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you = moron.

    When you can provide links to actual science magazines or engineering reports supporting the existance or the dangers of a witch, please do.

    Oh, wait. You are not grounded in reality.

  173. Migrating birds and magnetic field navigation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not so sure about this, but I have been told that some animals can sense the Earth's magnetic field. Birds for example that migrate for the winter and fly long distances to other continents navigate using some king of 'built-in' compass. They kind of have a sixth sense, which enables them to 'feel' the north/south -polarities, which is very useful for navigation when flying high up in the sky.

    If the Earth's magnetic polarities would switch, how would wildlife that have this sense react? Is the polarity change so slow that an evolution/adaptation could be seen, or would some spieces be functionally impaired or even existentially threatened?

  174. But E and W don't flip by devphil · · Score: 2


    Only the poles flip. The Earth will still rotate in the direction it does now, so East (defined as "the direction in which a planet rotates") and West ("the other way") will remain the same.

    Animals that think of east as "face north then turn right" are screwed, people that think of east "where the sun rises" are okay.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:But E and W don't flip by AdrianG · · Score: 2

      Yes, but the original poster of this silly idea was talking about re-marking what was probably a compass card, and since the whole card will be rotated by the changing magnetic field, if "N" and "S" are switched, "E" and "W" must also be switched.

      Adrian

  175. Am I the only one ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to spot the set-up for a joke in that comment?

  176. World In Peril, the book a MUST read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For anyone who wants to read about the people who found out about the magnetic pole shift and its geological implications, namely a possible new ice age. A little quote:

    "As World In Peril traces the unit's work in terrestrial magnetism, the significance of their findings becomes increasingly apparent. In 1947, Lieutenant Frank O. Klein pinpointed the magnetic North Pole 165 miles closer to the geographic North Pole than previously predicted, and the unit's results sparked a scientific investigation into the ramifications of the data. That investigation raised the question of what would happen if and when the magnetic pole converged on the geographic pole. The two had been moving ever closer, and the 46th Reconnaissance Squadron's research indicated that the gap was closing more rapidly than anticipated. Geophysicists analyzed the data, and a startling new hypothesis was formed."

    find it here

  177. Keep the faith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as you feel comforted, the truth doesn't matter.

  178. Hold it, hold it, hold it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot Kurzweil's third law of nuclear dynamics:
    A nucleotide in a peptide chain is prevented from traversing any formation wherein the principle dynamic flux is 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than epsilon-Fe and the summary flux density exceeds 1.297 E^12 or when the moon is full and owls are in flight.

  179. It's not that much power. by Gldm · · Score: 1

    I've got another currently feasible experiment that could provide enough power for this, that could likely be implemented over the course of the next 20 years if anyone wanted to do it.

    But it's long so if you want to talk about it email me because this thread will probably drop off the map soon. =)

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

    1. Re:It's not that much power. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      I've got another currently feasible experiment that could provide enough power for this, that could likely be implemented over the course of the next 20 years if anyone wanted to do it.

      But it's long so if you want to talk about it email me because this thread will probably drop off the map soon. =)


      That would be easier to do with your email address.

      Or perhaps make a post about the topic in your journal? That's probably the simplest way for us to get into a long discussion without losing context.

    2. Re:It's not that much power. by Gldm · · Score: 1

      Sorry, not that familliar with this message board's conventions. My email is gldm@mail.com . I haven't tried using the journal yet, but feel free to email me.

      --

      Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  180. The End of the Solar System! by euxneks · · Score: 1

    Scientists have discovered that its strength has dropped precipitously over the past two centuries and could disappear over the next 1,000 years.

    In other news, the sun may implode on itself and create a red giant over the next 25 million years (estimates may vary)...

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  181. Simulation with animation by Seanasy · · Score: 2
    This is from 1996 but it's pertinent: When North Goes South: Three-dimensional Simulation of Geomagnetic Field Reversal

    This bit from the story:

    Paramount's latest sci-fi thriller, The Core... depicts a world beset by just such a polar reversal, with radiation sweeping the planet.

    makes it seem like an advertisement more than a real story.
  182. Physics exams by johnty · · Score: 1

    no!!! now we'll all fail our physics exams...

    --
    I am unique, just like you, and you, and you...
  183. An answer to Slashdotting??? by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

    Could this be the biggest communications disruption other than a good old fashioned slashdotting? Forget beowulf Clustering!

    --

    You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
  184. Well by geoffaus · · Score: 1

    Any chance of this happening before my end of year exams? Life: A sexually transmitted terminal disease.

    --
    As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
  185. Will computers survive? by Snover · · Score: 1

    Along the same lines... what about computers? HDDs are just huge magnets, and most of the other parts are magnetically charged. I'm not sure how dependent these things are on the Earth's magnetic field, but what would happen? Same question for tapes, and anything else magnetic.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  186. Re:CO2 emissions from fossil fuel more than volcan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, impressive graph. I particularly like the way they avoid starting from zero so as to mislead the reader. Maybe we could get them to do a study showing Linux growth rates, Microsoft would be wiped off the chart!

  187. Well, the earth is slowing down by libertythink · · Score: 1

    The pole-flip is all in reference to Nibiru's descent towards earth, which is estimated to be 12/13/2013. Keep your eyes open for earthquakes.....

    --
    :: It' not a prion if you never try the door ::
  188. M$ for the Masses by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

    Don't you see, this is a great reason to use Micro$oft Windows. By the time the field changes or disappears, users will be so used to intermittent failures that all we will need to do is add a new STOP error:

    STOP ERROR 0x000007D0 (0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000)
    SOLAR_FLARE_VIOLATION

    --

    You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
  189. Nukes solves it all... by Mattsson · · Score: 1

    Hey!
    What's with this "setting of some nukes will solve everyting" mentality in the US anyway?

    Giant block of stone tumbling towards earth!
    Solution: Let's nuke it!!!

    Oh no! The poles are reversing!
    Solution: Let's nuke the core!!!

    The russians are being communistic!
    Solution: Let's point nukes at'em!!!

    The japanese won't give up!
    Solution: Let's nuke'em!!!

    Give up with the nuke fetishism already!

    (By the way... Hint to people who hasn't got a shred of humor: This post is supposed to be modded "funny" ;-)

    --
    /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  190. Re:Get real! [magnetization of the core] by Fyz · · Score: 1

    Don't quote me on this, but I'm pretty sure one of my lecturers explained once that if the core was supposed to be a bar magnet, it's power at the climax would be so incredibly huge that the globe itself would begin to deform. Can anybody confirm or deny this?

  191. Another good quote by Galvatron · · Score: 2
    If they continue to grow at the same rate, the Earth's dipole will disappear within just two millennia.

    I think this is the greatest indication that the original story is just meant to sell a movie plot. "Just" two millennia? Yeah, time to start panicing about the destruction of our GPS satallites (which of course, we probably won't even be using 100 years from now).

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  192. National Geographic by GordoSlasher · · Score: 1

    My 20 year stash of National Geographic magazines will become worthless - all the maps will be upside down!

  193. What about HAARP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen a single comment about it in this discussion. (Then again, I have a short attention span.)

    Maybe it was there to save our bacon all along.

  194. Y2K would have saved the economy. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    I blame everybody that helped avoid a Y2K crash (myself included) for the current state of the economy. If we geeks had had the foresight not to fix things to well the economy would still be buzzing. We should have fixed the stuff that could kill people and then left the rest broken. ;) We need to think of some other bug we can induce fear about so as to boost our own pay rate again. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Y2K would have saved the economy. by Shanep · · Score: 2

      If we geeks had had the foresight not to fix things to well the economy would still be buzzing.

      You work for Microsoft don't you.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  195. Data loss. by MikeFM · · Score: 2

    Possibly the shift would create magnetic bursts that'd wipe hardrives clean forcing everyone to upgrade to Windows Armageddon. Things are okay. The world may be dying but Bill Gates stock portfolio looks great.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  196. you forgot something by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

    in your calculations you forgot to include that massive amounts of signs proclaiming "magnetic field generator buried here. call before you dig!" so that morons dont dig it up.

    actually, with that kind of power running thru it, they would probably do the cool 'hair standing on end and visible skeleton' thing from the cartoons when they touch power lines, so it might be good for a laugh BEFORE WE ALL DIE FROM NO MAGNETIC FIELD. IM NOT NORMALLY A PRAYING MAN, BUT IF YOU ARE UP THERE AND CAN HEAR ME, PLEASE, HELP US, SUPERMAN!!!

    1. Re:you forgot something by pipper-noiter · · Score: 1

      argh! we've already established simpsons lied to us about the flushing toilet thing, so it doesn't deserve to be quoted! Bad simpsons! oh who am I kidding I can't stay mad at them :)

  197. I'm continually amazed... by Royster · · Score: 2

    ...at the lack of scientific knowledge here on /.

    Mars and Venus actually share an important feature -- they've both lost most of their hydrogen. Thus, there's no water on Venus and very little atmosphere at all on Mars.

    When there is little protection from Solar winds, molecules in the atmosphere are dissociated into ions. The hydrogen then gets its temperature raised and some of the hydrogen leaks out into space never to return to the gravity well.

    Now, I'm not saying that the Earth's atmosphere will all boil off during a magnetic field reversal, but the effects on the ground and to the atmosphere would be profound.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  198. Re:Get real! -- No, Complex! by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 2

    Our functions may be complex, but are our poles simple?

  199. what does this really mean? by isbhod · · Score: 1

    so, like, when the pole thingys flip, will the water go down the other way when i flush? ;)

  200. lets face it by fattybob · · Score: 1

    nobody has the slightest idea how it happens, why it happens, and what happens when it actually happens, we only know that at regular intervals, the magentic polarity switches, as it is clearly evidenced by the spreading ocean floor (see plate tectonics). Yes, there is no clear evidence in the fossil record that suggetss anything nasty happens, not even increased levels of radiation - has anyone done any pore fluid anaylysis to check this?

    Of course, an alternative theory has it all in God's hands, and wherever you lay your faith, a true scientist will never restrict his vision with theories alone, however good, it's all commonly accepted, but not actually known - like the old flat earth model!

    And before the flames start, I am a firm believer in both the theories of evolution and plate tectonics!

  201. Oh great by deadgoon42 · · Score: 1

    Now I'm gonna have to learn my compass backwards. Now South will be white and north will be black... or is it other way around... ummm... oops

    --

    Smeghead every day of the week.
  202. Re:I remember seeing this on sightings years ago.. by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
    According to that new-age chick... can't remember her name now. Ah, Ruth Montgomery. This is probably the pole shift that will cause millions or billions of deaths with only the enligthened few remaining.

    Yeah right... Go smoke a few more, Ruth. :)

    Actually, is she dead yet? She looked pretty old when I read one of her books that I checked out of the library because it was in the UFO section. WTF? UFOs? I guess there isn't a "new-age drugs working on a 60+ year-old mind" section in the Dewey decimal system. :)

  203. Inertial Guidance System? by luciuskwok · · Score: 1
    I thought that military planes use an inertial guidance system as their primary means of navigation. This is where you have sensors that detect acceleration and use a computer to determine your position. Of course, you have to set it to a known location when you're on the ground.

    In enemy territory or over the open ocean, you won't find radar beacons.

    Gyros tend to drift as you fly over long distances, and need to be compared to a magnetic compass or other reference.

  204. Read all about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ken Kesey's 1992 novel "Sailor Song" describes this event. Worth a read. ISBN: 0140139974

  205. Does that mean ... by gone_bush · · Score: 1

    that Australia with change from Down Under to Up There?

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less travelled by. (Robert Frost, 1916)
  206. Ahah! by 955301 · · Score: 1

    Navigation and communication satellites, Earth's eyes and ears, would be destroyed and migrating animals left unable to navigate.

    Well then, that explains the geese I saw the other day, all pissed off and standing around the one I figure was leading the flock. He was hissing and kicking his garmon gps around in the dirt.

    Whew! Thought I was losing my mind for a second. They usually make good products.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  207. NEWS FLASH by redshift-systems · · Score: 1

    A man walked into his Doctor's office today wearing nothing but a pair of shorts made out of cling-wrap. His Doctor looked at him and exclaimed: "I can clearly see you're nuts".

    This type of behaviour illustrates what we might see happen when we are all affected by the global magnetic shift episode.

    I'm Kent Brockman.

  208. so many things wrong with that article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok, i'm not an expert on the subject, but after talking with my geology prof, he laughed at the article. first of all, the switches happen every 400k years or so, the last switch was about 400k years ago, yes we as humans know how long it takes, i won't go into details here, but it's pretty simple science... second, the switch takes aprox 1k years to occur, the magnetic field DOES NOT dissapear, the pole slowly moves from the north to the south, it is a very gradual thing, quick in geologic time, but we as humans wouldn't notice the movement or the switch without our advanced measurment and data collecting technologies that we have.
    my take on the article is that it must be by the same guy who wrote the article saying an asteroid was going to hit earth and riled everyone up, when in fact, it would miss by quite a large margin.

    yay for poor grammar, spelling and punctuation.

    1. Re:so many things wrong with that article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know, there's also a chance your geology professor might be wrong. i'm not saying he IS, but you sure seem to be taking his word 100% just because you know him.

  209. Re:Business model - the MS bug by Nomad37 · · Score: 1

    errr... the 19th century? dude, you need to take that tin-foil hat off now

    --
    Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will! - Antonio Gramsci.
  210. Obligatory Monty Python Reference by mbcbvn · · Score: 2, Funny

    An African or a European swallow?

    --
    dd
  211. The bug is going to be fixed by $0.02 · · Score: 1

    Right now Earth's magnetic North Pole is located at the geographic South Pole (precisely close to it) and magnetic South Pole is located at geographic North Pole. So the flip will just fix the bug.

    --
    If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
    1. Re:The bug is going to be fixed by yakamichi · · Score: 1

      QUOTE
      Given that temperatures at such depths rival those of the Sun's surface
      UNQUOTE

      bull. absolute. temperatures at the deepest depths of the earth will NEVER rival those at the Sun's surface - if they did, we would have roasted at the beginning of evolution.

      we would not have existed, of course. and we would not have written such misleading articles. and there would be no /.

      wow - that is quite a thought!

  212. don'ten be-en a retarden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terms like "vaxen" and "boxen" are gayen.

  213. Re:Business model - the MS bug by DrainBead · · Score: 1

    Actually, the consutants I know are not too hot on their history... :-)

    --
    Dyslexics of the world, untie!
  214. And submarines too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't submarines use inertial guidance also?

  215. why not? by BiOFH · · Score: 2

    re: disruption of electronics and satellite crippling
    the story did mention this.
    and the solar flaring you mention would have to occur at the most incredibly opportune second as the broiling radiation furnace our upper atmosphere will become will begin vaporising those satellites straight away. however they'd already have begun to die from the bombardment they were not designed to handle.

    and I have to disagree re: us -- very many things could happen to us. not the least of which would be radiation poisoning/extremely accelerated cancer rates (our solar defenses in our atmosphere will be among the first to go) and possibly the steady loss of our atmosphere altogether (and associated steady heat related deaths) which would most certainly kill us.

    (my sig is not directed at you)

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  216. Wouldn't surprise me to find this is so by Jewbird · · Score: 1, Troll

    Seriously. People have been fucking shit up on a global scale with funky wave devices since the 19th century. Do a Google search on Tesla. They say that huge-ass blast in Siberia that was the biggest explosion ever recorded (although few people here know about it methinks) was not a meteor as some claim, but one of Tesla's experiments. Also, I heard from a friend that Tesla claimed that there was a frequency that would destroy the earth. Sounds like utter bs, but really, EVERYTHING, including the earth has a specific frequency. If you generate the same frequency and in phase, you absolutely will cause an increase in the amplitude of the conductive medium's oscillations until it becomes unstable and shatters. You can argue the history or what's going on currently. Frankly, we don't know if any of that was ever true or not. What we DO know is what's possible with our existing knowledge of science!

    --
    For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods
    1. Re:Wouldn't surprise me to find this is so by PsykhoKiwi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First comment:

      There is no real benefit to which way the poles point, the only thing it would do would mean that everyone had to buy or reconfigure their compasses...hmm maybe I've stumbled on to something. Who'd have suspected the quiet compass industry of something so evil :0)

      Second comment:
      With regards to the frequency of the Earth, the Earth as a whole will have no resonant frequency because it is made up of different sections all of inconsistant phyiscal materials. For a whole object to have a single resonant frequency it must be the same material throughout. You could possibly get a resonant frequency that would shatter parts of the Earth's crust but the impact would be limited through the existance of unconformities, folding and the huge varieties of rocks that make up the crust.
      So the comment you should have made is that every substance has a specific resonant frequency.

      --
      Just remember that if the world didn't suck we'd all fall off.
    2. Re:Wouldn't surprise me to find this is so by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

      First comment: Consider the current generated when the poles switch. Lets hope the switch is gradual else I could see the core heating up quite a bit due to current flow.

      Second comment: Everything has a resonant frequency. Even the earth has an overall one eventhough its made up of subcomponents with independent resonant frequencies. (this is known as a beat which in itself has a frequency) I agree though that you will need high sustained power to overcome the damping effects of the various different frequency components within the earth though.

    3. Re:Wouldn't surprise me to find this is so by PsykhoKiwi · · Score: 1

      I don't think the it is a case of the magnetic field actually moving, I think it is moreso a case of the magnetic field thinning with poles one way and then growing in intensity with the poles the other way.
      I don't know a major amount on the specifics of this, though I am aware it is a frequent occurrence in geological terms.
      I wonder if it is a case of the field dissipating completely before coming back the other way round, or if there is some changeover where there are different magnetic fields of differing intensities...of course I may be talking complete cobbles :0)

      From what I understand of resonant frequencies, you would in effect only be hitting the resonant frequency of part of the Earth and causing that bit to shatter. If the Earth was a consistant material throughout though a huge compound it would have one resonant frequency though the fact that there are different sections made up of different materials would mean that overall there would be no one frequency which affected the whole.

      --
      Just remember that if the world didn't suck we'd all fall off.
  217. I should have known.. by yoinkslap · · Score: 0

    dammit! now what am i going to do with all those halfprice bulk compasses?? /me loads up ebay.. someone must wants them, surely??

    --
    Dont ask me...Im just the bass player.
  218. It's called Project HAARP.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and this project would make Hiroshima pale by comparison.
    I would urge all Americans who think they live in a free society to question what is happening in secret in their own country.
    Once fully in operation, HAARP will enable the miltary establishment to manipulate Global weather, control international comms. and surveillance, affect human personality.
    For more information on this read "Atlantis Rising" by Pat Cori (www.iuniverse.com).
    Even the top military brass are being used as stooges for whoever is really pulling the strings.
    There is a great danger that they will end up blowing half of Alaska with this.
    This project needs to be stopped before it gets out of hand and possibly destroys the Earth.

    1. Re:It's called Project HAARP.... by Marcos+the+Jackle · · Score: 0

      It's run by the Masons, funded by the Shadow Government, and designed by the large Greys that live at Area 51.

      [insert cookoo clock sfx here]

      Have a day.

    2. Re:It's called Project HAARP.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...well you've almost got it pal. The secret govt. as it's better known.
      All I can say is - I used to be skeptical about all this stuff until I read a couple of books ...
      Now I'm completely convinced...
      Now don't tell me you don't think Iraq is about the oil... I reckon it's Saudi Arabia next....

  219. Just call Reed Richards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I recall right there were a Fantastic Four magazine where aliens where trying to revert our magnetic poles because it interfered with their computers (they have arrived here thousands of years ago when the and where in statsis until recently and in that time the magnetic core were reversed). Im not sure but their trials caused havoc through machines around the planet. Reed Richards simply changed some small things on their ship and solved their problem, making their technology able to operate in the current magnetic conditions.

  220. There were people executed - but for theft by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here in Nottingham if you stole more then the value of a loaf of bread you were hung on the courthouse steps (the fittings for the gallows are still there).

    Less than that and you were transported.

    The courthouse is a museum now.

    Admittedly the law wasn't created to specifically deal with the poor but their lives were held in contempt. TBH if you survived the journey and lived out your sentence you probably ended up better off than back in Nottingham but still, not everyone did.

    Whatever you want to call it, it was akin to genocide / slavery and it's a great injustice to those unfortunates and their antipodean descendents to be branded as criminals rather than victims.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  221. other forms of computing by _outcat_ · · Score: 2

    I'm just heartened that a lot of the heavy-duty intercontinental communication is done by fiberoptic. Why don't we start looking more seriously at alternate forms of computing? We've known for decades now that magnetic devices can be unreliable, but there doesn't seem to be a push to change gears.

    There are up-and-coming technologies that could be feasible--check out http://www.media.mit.edu/research (MIT Media labs.)

    Also, if this is going to be an extremely gradual change, the switchover will be less painful. But has anyone actually tried our standard magnetic-based equipment under an environment equivalent to the one after the pole switch? Or the possible environments *during* the switch? I imagine it'd be like moving a huge magnet over an entire room and seeing if hard drives still work. :P

    And how would one make this seem relevant to the general public? The Y2K fix was so behind-the-scenes that ENTIRELY TOO MANY people dismissed it as hype, when in fact programmers, engineers, IT people worked countless hours to make the transition as smooth as it was. How could one convince the general public that they need different forms of computers in EVERYTHING, from their wristwatches to their air traffic control centers?

    I'm just throwing out stuff, here. *shrug*

    --
    Angry IT woman in big clompy boots. And talking lint!.
  222. And ... in other NEWS .... by vortexau · · Score: 1

    A large group of Polish folk, with a lot of iron in their diet, were seen doing headstands.

    Scientists were not sure what was causing this.

    They were heard chanting:"We want to be Down-under, where women glow and men chunder!
    Do you hear, do you hear the thunder?"

    Members of the Australian '70-80s Rock-group "Men at work" were unavailable for comment.
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  223. Re:In addition to many species of migrating animal by banzai51 · · Score: 1

    African or European swallows?

  224. Boiling atmospheres and the humans by Whiskas · · Score: 1

    If I recall my biology/evolution classes in High School, humanoid forms ( ie, that ape before us... ) exist for some, what, 3 million years? Follow me:
    250.000 yrs - 1 magnetic flip
    so 4 flips in a million years, or 12 flips while "we" were standing here.
    I suppose humans ( or apes or any other mamal for that matter ) at that time could not live without minimal O2 and other atmospherical components such as those we have today. So it can't have been that bad. Why should just THIS next one be the Magnetic Flip of Doomsday(tm) ?
    Bring it down.

  225. Living Under Ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoo Whoo !!! We can all move to Utah and burrow into the limestone and make under ground houses..
    And take on multiple wives as its still legal there!!!

    1. Re:Living Under Ground by swingerman · · Score: 1

      Um...it's not legal there and hasn't been since Utah was admitted as a state. That was a requirement of their admittance to the Union.

  226. No foil hats!!! It focuses the mind control rays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from your tv.

    Focused mind control rays work so very much
    quicker than the low power base rays that
    are beamed out of your tv set.

  227. Re:In addition to many species of migrating animal by Nick_Psyko · · Score: 1

    Blue.

    NO NO NO ... Red!

    --
    mountvol \\?\brain{dbe069b1-65ae-11d5-bab4-806d6172696f}\hu mor\
  228. Possible alternate reason for the ozone hole? by waferhead · · Score: 1

    If the magnetic field weaker, the "funneling" effect is also weaker, and less ozone is created, and "holes" form.

    Or I could be on crack. Seems too sensible.

    Interesting how the timetables seem to coincide nicly, too.

  229. Have faith in the Great American People!!! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    If our survival ( ability to run SUV's and talk on microscopic phones we can never find in our SUV's ) was at stake we could put an enourmous amount of time and resources into a project that would save us. All the people would contribute whatever would be necessary. We would achieve greatness, develop all the technology needed, forge a new and greater future for all. At least until the IPO that is. Then a few people get rich and survive in luxury while the rest of us die like the poor $$$ fodder we are.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  230. Re:In addition to many species of migrating animal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!

  231. Satelite orientation will be affected. by adamdeprince · · Score: 1

    One concern is the effect on satelites that use interaction w/ the earths magnetic field to adjuster their orientation. A lack of a magnetic field will mean that fuel must be used for orientation instead, thus decreasing their life span.

  232. Where is Captain Planet when you need him? by vikstar · · Score: 1

    "Captain planet, he's our hero..."

    --
    The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.