Slashdot Mirror


60G Nomad Zen vs. The iPod

war3rd writes "According to an article in BetaNews, Creative is going to be releasing an upgraded Nomad Zen at the end of the month that is not only larger than the iPod, but cheaper too. At $400 for 60G ($100 less than the 30G iPod), the new Zen will sport more features, although it may be slightly larger than the newer generation of iPods. I have been putting off buying an MP3 player until I felt that the arms race was settling down, but the new Zen is making my mouth water. So what does the /. community think, are Creative and Apple going to be the top players in this arena? Is it time I jumped onto the bandwagon? One thing is for certain, I am going to be watching the reviews closely."

649 comments

  1. Viva la Zen!!! by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been using a Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox 3 (30gb) unit for the last year and 10+ hours a *day* and have no complaints. Solid unit. I can not only play MP3s, but also WMA files (sorry /.-ers,,, I have sinned).

    The unit also easily stores data files. w00t!

    IMHO, the zen is an easy choice - twice the storage, $100 less, tons of reliability, and more features.

    Btw, there is also a HUGE Nomad community too! I'll cite Nomadness.net as a great example. Good forums and good Nomad news.

    1. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by questionlp · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The only gripe I have with the Jukebox line of players is not the hardware but rather the bloated and buggy Creative PlayCenter software. It's no where as clean as iTunes... but Red Chair Software has a kick-ass program that replaces PlayCenter and has some additional capabilities like viewing and streaming files over a Web-based interface and SQL-like queries on your MP3 files. The program is Notmad Explorer and is available in freeware (limited functionality) and payware... (sorry, not free as in libre either).

      Also the Nomad Jukebox 3 (not the current Zen) has optical-in recording to MP3 or wave. It's not as simple as pressing record on a portable MiniDisc recorder, but it works in a pinch.

    2. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      LOL!!! As soon as you started complaining about PlayCenter, I was going to reply about Red Chair's Notmad. I use that as well! Real nice software.

      It's like using Windows Explorer to transfer music files and data files. Just drag and drop! Mindless.

    3. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by mrklin · · Score: 5, Informative
      iPod has benn able to store data since generation 1. In fact, you can even boot from it if needed. Can't say that about the Nomad.

      Oh, and you speak as if there is not a HUGE iPod community? Ever been to http://www.ipodlounge.com/ and the 1000+ pictures of iPod around the world?

    4. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 3, Funny
      Ever been to http://www.ipodlounge.com/ and the 1000+ pictures of iPod around the world?


      Wow! That's definitely worth the extra $100. ;-)
    5. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by aberkvam · · Score: 4, Informative
      The unit also easily stores data files. w00t!
      Just to make sure people know, the iPod also easily stores data files. It has a number of other tricks up its sleeve including games, calendar, contact lists, text note storage, alarm clock, sound recording, etc.

      It does not play WMAs though.

    6. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by mrklin · · Score: 1

      Of course not - please read the comment before replying. The point was that there is a large, if not much larger, iPod community.

    7. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I read your whole comment. :-) I was certainly not trying to imply that the iPod didn't have a community. I didn't comment on that at all.

      Appreciate you adding that to the mix though. I was just having fun (notice the smiley emoticon). :-)

    8. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by happypizzaguy · · Score: 1

      That, and the Zen is entirely encased in anodized aluminum. Yummy!

      --
      "When all else fails, there's always delusion." -Conan O'Brien
    9. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creative always jacks up the prices on all the hardware they sell. They get away with it, too, since the fans are mindless drones that'll pay anything.

      The Nomad is better value.

    10. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by rich_r · · Score: 1

      It's absolutely fantastic! I wish they'd slow down on the releases of new versions- I have to reinstall once every couple of weeks just to keep up!

    11. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I have a 20gb Nomad Jukebox 3 and I love it

      the thing runs fast plays great quality (even can go 4chanel sound), it has some usefull effects (along with the usuall range of creative presets, similar to those in their cards) such as time scaling, which is useful at least to me for many purposes.

      The input recording is awesome, it can be used combined with a short cable and a cd player as a portable cd copying device and I have used it with a mic to record lectures and seminars, the recording may not be as simple as pressing record but i'm glad it gives many options such as gain settings, encoding type/quality, and the ability to stop and start recordings on new tracks of a CD

      it may not look as nice as an ipod but I find it much more useful than my friends ipod

      --
      Bottles.
    12. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by jx100 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, the Nomad is made by Creative....

    13. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      iPod has benn able to store data since generation 1.

      And the Creative Nomads have been able to store it since before the iPod existed. So what?

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    14. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Python2121 · · Score: 1

      i feel like interface and sound quality are my highest priorities. i know that you cant beat apple's interface. their ability to support the ipod so perfectly comes from the fact that they make their products almost 100% by themselves (obviously they outsource things, but everything is propritary) i would have to test creative's sound quality

      --
      ---redundancy error---
    15. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That wasn't his point, his point was that the community was large. Honestly I wouldn't trade my 10 GB iPod (3rd Gen) for anything (other than a newer iPod).

      60 GB is worthless if the software sucks. The integration between iTunes, iSync, and the iPod make for an excellent product that I don't have to spend any extra time fiddling with to get it to work.

      Judging from other posts here, and on the source article, it seems like existing and prior Nomad Zen products aren't exactly all they're cracked up to be.

      You pay more for high quality stuff, and the iPod _is_ high quality. Its not perfect, but what is?

    16. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Kelar · · Score: 1

      But try to create a playlist on your iPod without having a computer attached to it. Basic functionality that everything else has, but apple wants you to buy new hardware for!

    17. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by moriya · · Score: 1

      or sneak in your own applications.

      iPod: 100 Warez in your pocket

    18. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      "games, calendar, contact lists, text note storage, alarm clock,"

      Well... So does my phone, which I carry around with me alot more often than my mp3player, making it unnecessary for me to have those features in my player or carry a pda.

      As long as all the other players require special software, beside the drivers, to copy mp3's to or from the unit, I'll just stick to my Archos for music.
      It might be a bit rough at the edges, but at least it lets me handle my files any way I want.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    19. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by dcaulton · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can also get a nifty driver and power toy that let's you mount the music partition of any creative nomad (including zen) as a normal hard drive, accessible from Windows Explorer. Totally circumvent playcenter. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/plus/dme/portable devices.asp#PTAudio

    20. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new IPODs let you create a playlist on the fly. IPOD is just much better made and sounding. Do yourself a favor and spend the extra money. 60GB is overkill for mp3's unless your going to use it as a means to carry other data.

    21. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Jukebox 2 (10GB):

      I've actually considered getting an iPod to replace it because of some things about it that bother me.

      Complaints:
      -Battery life isn't nearly what was advertised
      -The software is complete crap (redchair's is better, but costs $$ on top of what you've already shelled out for the player).
      -Creative's support sucks (I wanted to find out what the deal was with the battery life, iirc they advertised 17 hours on a charge)
      -The player's UI is kind of clunky

      Not saying that I hate it though.

      Pros:
      -It was cheap compared to the iPod
      -I've beaten it up and it still works fine
      -The UI isn't *that* bad, its just bad compared to say a RIM device
      -Sound quality is good
      -Fairly quick boot/scrolling etc.

    22. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Caltheos · · Score: 1

      I got my Creative Nomad Jukebox (6GB) couple years ago for $125. It was an open box model but it has worked flawlessly.. All i have is a tape player in my car so it sits under my dash most of the time but I do take it out a lot. And it came with two sets of Nickel Hydride AA's for loads of playing time. Interface is slow but i'm sure a lot of that is from it being out of date. Only gripe is I misplaced the connection software, and the only software they offer is for win9x and UPDATES to win2000/xp and I can't install the win9x copy on 2000 (bitches about something or the other).

      --
      We've secretely replaced the Enterprise's dilithium crystals with Folgers crystals. Lets see if they notice.
    23. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 1

      I've dropped my iPod from about 4 feet up onto solid concrete and it still _looks_ fine, let alone operates fine. There are a few surface scratches and dings, but the case has held up much better than I thought it would.

      You really get what you pay for with the iPod. However, lately, I've been hearing more and more about nasty problems with the Second Generation 10 GB iPods (with the solid-state wheel). Mine is still perfect.

      I still haven't found a portable player that sounds as good as the iPod. It's headphones are great and the amplifier sounds smooth.

    24. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Zeal17 · · Score: 1

      And the Creative Nomads have been able to store it since before the iPod existed. So what?

      His point is that being able to store files should not be listed as a feature of why the Creative product is better. (Read the parent)

      --

      "If it sucks without butter, it still sucks with butter, only creamier." - AC
    25. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Uart · · Score: 1

      WOW! hmmm.. I'll need to try that sometime.

      Meanwhile, I still have the old 5gig iPod.

      I'm lamenting my last ten megabytes as I type this.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    26. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by g4dget · · Score: 1
      iPod has benn able to store data since generation 1. In fact, you can even boot from it if needed. Can't say that about the Nomad.

      Most of the disk-based players are basically just standard USB or FireWire drives with extra firmware. Whether you can boot from them or not depends on your laptop or desktop and your boot loader, not on the drive.

      Oh, and you speak as if there is not a HUGE iPod community?

      Why do you care?

    27. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by anagama · · Score: 1

      Maybe someday there will something as cool as the CUI (commandical user interface) I use for my Nomad II mg.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    28. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by pigeon · · Score: 1

      Good for you, but does your phone has 5-60 gigabyte of storage for mp3's? That is the gripe I have with the intergrated devices. They are nice, but the mp3 player has max 128 MB, the camera is only vga resolution, the pda is limited compared to a real pda etc. The all in one solutions are for me solutions where the components just aren't good enough.

    29. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      I have a jukebox 3 as well and agree that the Playcenter is fairly bug ridden. However, I don't think Red Chair Software made a good choice for the design of their software. It is basically designed as an extension of Windows Explorer. Better to keep the application seperate from the OS. If there's a bug in their software then maybe the whole system becomes unstable. Also, they will have to release an upgrade every time a new version of Windows comes out. It would be far more useful if they released a version that is compatible with the MAC, which is a feature that is really lacking

    30. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the only one that used "LOL" in his post, no one else did? Perhaps you should consider not using that moronic abbreviation, as in the eyes of many people it makes you look stupid. In fact, as soon as I saw "LOL" I skipped over everything else you had to say, I doubt you're actually laughing out loud, and even so, why say that? There are perfectly accepted alternatives that don't make you sound like a moron, try "hahaha" sometime, no one is going to bitch you out for saying that. In closing, stop using "LOL" before you're smashed in the face with a tire iron. Thank you.

    31. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been using a Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox 3 (30gb) unit for the last year and 10+ hours a *day* and have no complaints



      Why do I get the feeling you are a postal employee playing "Ride of the Valkyries" in a continuous loop.

    32. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your point about Creative underscores why Apple has a larger share of the market. Others may make larger and sometimes better products, but Apple gives you a better solution.

    33. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! That's funny! ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!

      (Damn lameness filter. Four score and seven years ago...)

    34. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say the Zen is an easy choice, but yet you own a Nomad Jukebox 3?

      I'm not even sure why this story is titled this way. The Zen works with Windows, the iPod works with a Mac -- or Windows if you're a masochist.

      They seem like two different markets, really.

      I don't think they're going to steal many people away from the iPod. People get an iPod because they want IT -- often the same reason they got a Mac.

      Hell, the last Apple I owned was a IIe, and I'm still saving up for the new model 15" PowerBook and an iPod. I'm not buying X megahertz or X gigabytes -- I'm buying a PowerBook and an iPod.

    35. Re:Viva la Zen!!! by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      The main point of my post was "I don't need pda-funtionality in my mp3player, I'll rather have one that doesn't need special software to access."

      But I also have no need of a pda.
      I used to use a Palm V. Mainly for adressbook and calendar, but also for the occasional game or connecting it to my phone to send mail while out.
      When I got my old phone a few years ago, it had a usable adressbook with 3 numbers, 1 adress, 1 email and a textfield per post, a todo-scheduler and a calendar. All syncable via ir against outlook.
      That's when I stopped carrying around my pda.
      Why carry around two devices with the same adressbook and calendar entries synced?

      Since I got my new phone a month ago, I can do that and now also handle the last two via java-applications.
      It only has ~1.5MB for the apps, but that's more than enough for a simple email-client, a few games and a simple html-browser. Browsing on a 128*128 pixel 1" screen suck though... =)
      It's not one of those "pda-phones". All of those that I've tried suck. Usually by being to large to always carry around. (Try walking around with a P800 in your pocket... It's *way* to large for comfort.)
      As you say, integrated devices usually suck at everything.
      This is a phone, nothing else.

      That's why I use my 20gig archos for moving files and listening to mp3's.
      I only carry it when I'm going to listen to musik though. It's too large otherwise. (Allmost like two 2.5" harddrives on top of each other.)
      So having a calendar, adressbook or games in it would have no meaning.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  2. iPod by Ballresin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    iPod sports AAC. That's the kicker. I'd rather have quality than quantity. Besides...you really gonna fill that 60Gigs with music? I don't think so.

    --
    I got nothin'.
    1. Re:iPod by fidget42 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Besides...you really gonna fill that 60Gigs with music? I don't think so.
      I really like being able to use my iPod as a hard disk. I can download files to the iPod and take them to another Mac, Windows PC, or even Linux box, and moves the files without needing to burn CD ROMs. Saves time, space, and money (well, on CD-Rs at least).

      I currently have 5 GB of music, and 2 GB of data stored on my 20 GB iPod.
      --
      The dogcow says "Moof!"
    2. Re:iPod by Gogl · · Score: 1, Insightful

      First off, ripping my 300 or so cds at high quality VBR would go a decent way to filling that. I'm betting I could definitely fill a healthy chunk of the 60gigs, and it'd be nice to have room to grow, eh?

      That, and all this AAC stuff... is a 128kb AAC really as great as Apple insists? From what I've read, it is better than a 128kb MP3, but if you're ripping a decent VBR MP3 then it really isn't any better. That, and MP3s are, well, compatible on with hardware and software. AAC won't be a selling point until I can play them as easily as I can play MP3s, and that'll be awhile yet (seeing as how I'm not a Mac user).

    3. Re:iPod by questionlp · · Score: 1

      In fact yes... that is if I copy over all of MP3s (which come from CDs that I have purchased, new or used) in my collection onto it... but would I want to? Not really. Playlist management and choosing songs would be a pain on the road... that and I just don't listen to all gazillion songs...

    4. Re:iPod by valkraider · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Besides...you really gonna fill that 60Gigs with music? I don't think so.

      I do think so. My 10GB iPod is full, 100% legal-i-ripped-them-from-CDs-I-own mp3s at only 128kb. With just the CDs I *currently* own, I could fill a 30GB iPod with 128kb AAC files, I probably have about 40GB of 128kb AAC I could rip legally. That will only increase as time goes on.

      I think the better question is, when is video coming? I mean imagine a 120GB drive and a 3 inch color screen all in an almost iPod sized device - that you could use to play MPEG4 video...

      mmm - Future is tasty and on order for delivery soon...

    5. Re:iPod by astrashe · · Score: 1

      I have a 20G archos jukebox, and I feel constrained by the size. 60G would be about right.

      Also, I don't know about these other players, but the archos can be used as a USB 2.0 drive, so even if you didn't have enough music, you'd probably be able to use the space somehow.

      As soon as my warranty expires, I'm going to see if I can replace the drive with something bigger.

    6. Re:iPod by ecchi_0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      My warranty has expired and my harddrive has stopped spinning - I think I am going to follow this guide while installing a new one.

    7. Re:iPod by Recoil_42 · · Score: 1

      yeah; but with the extra space; cant i just encode my mp3's at a higher bitrate?

      --


      Newsie, Moderator, www.tauniverse.com
    8. Re:iPod by DeltaSigma · · Score: 2, Informative

      If I recall, AAC came up second to Ogg Vorbis in quality tests (based on listener selection, not wave form analysis, in which case I know vorbis still won but I don't know who came second). So in the absence of vorbis playing hardware (unless you're going to wait for a Neuros) the AAC does make itself an attractive selling point.

    9. Re:iPod by evilviper · · Score: 0
      iPod sports AAC.

      Well you can have DOUBLE the bitrate of your AACs in MP3 form on this thing, and it'll still cost LESS than the iPod.

      you really gonna fill that 60Gigs with music?

      I don't think I have 60GB worth, but I'm sure I have more than the 30GB iPod could handle.

      I'd rather have quality than quantity.

      From your comments, it sounds like you DON'T want quality NOR quantity... Maybe you want the style of the iPod.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:iPod by rkz · · Score: 0

      Neuros is great I AM waiting for one. It can broadcast the sound to a FM radio, so in my car I can listen without connecting AUX in. It can record. It can download track details from a digital fingerprint (if you got the file from another Neuros player). and comes with a bunch of tasty add-ons

    11. Re:iPod by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Besides...you really gonna fill that 60Gigs with music? I don't think so.

      Just because you can't fill 60 Gigs with music doesn't mean there is nobody who can fill 60 Gigs. If an average CD is about 50 MB of MP3 files, that is 1200 CDs for 60 Gigs. I'm sure I'm not the only person here with more than 1200 CDs. On other boards I've been on, some have more than 3000 CDs.

      Do you need to have access to all of your CDs everywhere you? Of course not. But there will come a day when you install 1199 CDs on your portable because you don't want to install that 1200th CD, and then you realize that the CD you really want to listen to is the one you didn't put on your MP3 player.

    12. Re:iPod by blixel · · Score: 1

      Besides...you really gonna fill that 60Gigs with music? I don't think so.

      "640k ought to be enough for anybody." -- Bill Gates

    13. Re:iPod by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Neuros is great I AM waiting for one.

      That statement makes no sense. Don't you mean "Neuros LOOKS great, I AM waiting for one"?

      After all, if you don't have one, you don't know for sure.

    14. Re:iPod by Cut · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      I rip all of mine at pretty high VBR (LAME preset extreme) and average about 100 MB/CD. I'm at around 1200 CD's, and have 110 GB used. I'd prefer to have all of my music on the portable unit and sync up with my mp3 HD semi-regularly than have to worry about prioritizing and all that. Plus, at that point it makes for a handy backup.

      So I'll be waiting for a while, but that's fine with me.

    15. Re:iPod by Atzanteol · · Score: 1
      Besides...you really gonna fill that 60Gigs with music? I don't think so.
      Whahahahahahaha!!!!

      Buddy, I could fill 60gig in as fast as I can write it to the hard drive! I've got an 80gig partition here *full* of mp3's I've ripped. I'm actually going to be expanding it soon (new 120Gig to play with).
      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    16. Re:iPod by rkz · · Score: 0

      Yeah it does look great doesn't it. My current solution is to burn the songs I want onto CDs as MP3s and play them on this:

    17. Re:iPod by GnrcMan · · Score: 1

      Actually, one of the great things about the iPod it its playlists and very easy UI. Makes digging through a huge MP3 library very doable on the road.

    18. Re:iPod by Ballresin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You realize that if you have a DVD player, for instance, you can put a CD of AAC audio in it and it'd work fine. AAC is the audio part of Dolby Digital Surround sound.

      --
      I got nothin'.
    19. Re:iPod by Azog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I'd rather not have AAC and the Digital Restrictions Managment crap that goes with it. AAC is zero advantage to me. I have no interest in buying DRM-protected songs from a limited selection for a dollar each. I prefer to buy used and independent CDs. No DRM, good selection, much less than $1 per song... admittedly, a lot of individual songs aren't great.

      But I'd much rather have a really big hard drive, and stick with my high-bitrate MP3 and OGG files. At an average 256 Kbps with VBR, it's very, very hard to hear any difference from the original.

      In other words, a big hard drive would provide quality as well as quantity.

      And, I really would fill that 60 GB with music. I have over 140 GB of MP3 and OGG files right now in fact, and it's much more convenient to just mirror big chunks of the collection rather than picking and choosing individual CDs or files.

      I just want to know if I can use the Zen from Linux. If so I'll probably buy one, it looks great. If it supports OGG, I'll get one for sure.

      --
      Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
      "HTML needs a rant tag" - Alan Cox
    20. Re:iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you rip them yourself, you can disable DRM in an AAC file. Plus, who says you have to use AAC? It still plays MP3s fine.

    21. Re:iPod by plalonde2 · · Score: 1
      libnjb now supports the Zen and Zen2. Gnomad2 is a usable interface, or you can use the command line tools like I do.

      Paul

    22. Re:iPod by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you've payed for 1200 cds, just buy a second mp3 player.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    23. Re:iPod by SlamMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know that the AAC files that the iPod playes don't have to have DRM in them, right? Just because the file format supports it doesn't mean you need to use it on files you create.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    24. Re:iPod by afidel · · Score: 1

      You remember wrong, AAC came in second to LAST in the C't reviews at 128kbps. It doesn't even really matter though because if you are worried about quality and have an iPod you will rip with lame at -extreme VBR settings, averages around 200-220kbps across most genres of music (I have classical, jazz, techno, hiphop and rock in my collection) and is indistinguishable from the source using a high quality DAC and Sennheiser heaphones, so definitly nothing thats going to be noticed with the iPod =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    25. Re:iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Panasonic had a line of devices, e-wear something, that did video and mp3's. Anybody own one?

    26. Re:iPod by sugam · · Score: 1

      Do you have any information on this? What DVD Players support this? Will it work if I burn an AAC file to a cd and try and play it? This could be really cool

      --
      read my blog
    27. Re:iPod by gig · · Score: 1

      History of music formats:

      old analog friends:
      - vinyl
      - compact cassette
      - 8-track cassette

      digital:
      - CDDA (audio CD)
      - MP3
      - AAC

      Note that the iPod plays all 3 important digital formats and that iTunes also converts your current CDDA into both MP3 and MP4 at all bitrates.

      There is no complete solution other than iPod right now.

    28. Re:iPod by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2, Insightful
      iPod sports AAC. That's the kicker. I'd rather have quality than quantity.

      You realise that WMA is actually very high quality right? They had some seriously smart bunnies work on the Windows Media codecs. I don't know how it compares to AAC, but I know it blows MP3 away, so I'd guess it's strongly competitive.

      What you say? It's a proprietary format? Yup, but hey, if you pay the right price Microsoft will license it to you - just like with AAC. Oh and they both have some kind of DRM too.

    29. Re:iPod by darien · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First off, ripping my 300 or so cds at high quality VBR would go a decent way to filling that. I'm betting I could definitely fill a healthy chunk of the 60gigs, and it'd be nice to have room to grow, eh?

      Just to add my personal experience; obviously not all albums are the same length, and the thing about VBR is that you can't predict precisely how much space a given track will take up. But I do all my encoding with lame --r3mix, and I find that, on average, most rips seem to come out at about 1.3Mb per minute.

      So, assuming your mileage doesn't vary (doubtful), and all your CDs contain 74 minutes of music (very doubtful), you can expect each one of your CDs to take up just under 100Mb. Or, to put it another way, your collection of 300 CDs would roughly half-fill that 60Gb unit.

      Which prompts me to muse that if the extra storage is really cheap, you may as well go for it; but unless you're planning to double the size of your music collection within the lifetime of this player, you won't need the space for music. Personally, I only rip tracks I reckon I'll want to listen to repeatedly, and from my own collection of around 300 CDs I've still only managed to half-fill my 20Gb iPod.

    30. Re:iPod by zeno_2 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here is one DVD player that supports AAC files, and it seems to me that just about any DVD player that can play mp3 files can also play AAC, but I could be wrong.

      Here is a page that describes the fact that Dolby supports AAC, but it doesn't look like it has anything to do with "Dolby Digital Surround sound".

    31. Re:iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Besides...you really gonna fill that 60Gigs with music? I don't think so.

      Well, I already have an almost filled 80GB drive with mp3 - over 15.000 songs or something like that - so why not? Besides you can use the extra space for other purposes if you don't want 60GB music :P
    32. Re:iPod by skrid · · Score: 1

      dolby digital audio encoding started with the name AC-3 http://www.dolby.com/digital/ and
      http://www.dolby.com/tech/ac-3mult.html .
      It's not the same as AAC which was first specified as part of MPEG2 audio and is now, with some tools added, part of MPEG4 audio, too.

    33. Re:iPod by Baki · · Score: 1

      Such extreme ripping only makes sense if you're listening on high-fi equipment. While the iPod has pretty decent quality for a portable player, it is impossible to hear the difference between 160kbit/s or better/higher with it (provided you use a decent encoder such as LAME).

      Also, the higher bitrate wastes battery life proportionally, i.e. 256kbit/s shall use the battery twice as fast as 128kbit/s.

      I use --alt-preset normal which is around 190kbit/s VBR, a good compromise between nearly as good as it gets for high-fi equipment and better than needed yet still not too big for portable use.

    34. Re:iPod by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      When you encode VBR 128 in LAME, you are specifing the BASE rate, and it would not be uncommon for a given sample to stay around 220-220kb/s rates. The LAME equivalent of AAC @ 128 is 'lame --preset 128', which sets it in ABR mode instead of VBR mode.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    35. Re:iPod by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      You realise that WMA has serious quality issues, don't you? It consistently scores behind mp3 on tests of audio quality.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    36. Re:iPod by dmarx · · Score: 1
      I think the better question is, when is video coming? I mean imagine a 120GB drive and a 3 inch color screen all in an almost iPod sized device - that you could use to play MPEG4 video...

      Or, even better-what you suggested, plus TV-Out connectors so you can watch the MPEG4 video on your TV rather than on a 3 inch screen.

      --
      "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
    37. Re:iPod by subrama6 · · Score: 1

      actually, ipoding has a bit about how toast can easily convert aac to aif. there's other things out there about converting to mp3 as well, but as yet those techniques look cumbersome. but this one is apparently relatively easy.

      http://www.ipoding.com/modules.php?op=modload&na me =News&file=article&sid=1142&mode=thread&order= 0

    38. Re:iPod by mbbac · · Score: 1

      My iTunes collection is currently somewhere over 3000 songs. Yet, my 10GB iPod only has around 1300 songs on it. I have somewhere over 4GB free on my iPod.

      I don't see a need to have my entire music collection on the iPod. I use my smart playlists in iTunes to automatically sync up my highest rated songs; my newest songs; anything that is ambient, jazz, or easy listening; and now my purchased music playlist.

      That said, I'm thinking of buying the new 15GB iPod since it is so thin. Much thinner than my G2 10GB iPod and the G3 30GB iPod.

      --

      mbbac

    39. Re:iPod by Ballresin · · Score: 1

      My bad. Shoulda known better. I worked as projectionist in a movie theater for 3 years...dur.

      --
      I got nothin'.
    40. Re:iPod by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      You got me, I just wanted an excuse to say "Ogg Vorbis."

      All the Ogg Vorbis naysayers just don't get why us pro-vorbis types keep mentioning it. The simple fact of the matter is that, not only are we attempting to get support for what we feel is the best lossy audio compression format out there, but it's also just fun to say.

      Go on, try it. "Ogg Vorbis." That's right. There is no better named audio codec, you have to give us that much.

  3. Does size matter? by macmastery · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess it depends what you value most. Size, capacity or style?

    1. Re:Does size matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Size, capacity or style?

      Pick two. :)

    2. Re:Does size matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot, read by nerds. Here size wins hands down (pun intended) every time.

    3. Re:Does size matter? by WHARG+!! · · Score: 2, Informative

      Quick illustration: Size of iPod vs. Zen

    4. Re:Does size matter? by tbmaddux · · Score: 1
      Size, capacity or style?
      Interface is critical. The iPod works with just one hand (size helps here too unless you have mutant freak hands or TK powers). Hold it and work the wheel and buttons with your thumb. It's very tough for the 2.5" hard drive based players to compete with that.
      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    5. Re:Does size matter? by robbieduncan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Snigger. Thats an old iPod - the new (Generation 3) iPods are even smaller!

    6. Re:Does size matter? by klui · · Score: 1

      They're quite close; but unless you're in Japan, where small is "king," it's not enough to make a really big difference, in my opinion. Now if you're talking about something like the Archos Jukebox, then it's a different issue.

      Probably the deciding factor becomes how is the controlling software. Never seen the Nomad, but I really like the intuitive nature of the iPod's software as well as the animated menus. I normally detest animated menus, but in this case, the way the menus move left or right gives good feedback where you're going relative to the hierarchy of menus you're traversing.

    7. Re:Does size matter? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      The iPod works with just one hand (size helps here too unless you have mutant freak hands or TK powers). Hold it and work the wheel and buttons with your thumb. It's very tough for the 2.5" hard drive based players to compete with that

      My 15 gig Archos works fine with one hand.

    8. Re:Does size matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably don't see why anyone complains about the original XBox controllers either :-)

    9. Re:Does size matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have big hands and have used both controllers for xbox. I tend to like the original more.

  4. Article by Bronz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looking to draw Windows users away from Apple's wildly popular iPod, Creative has released a mammoth update to its NOMAD Jukebox Zen portable audio player. The hard drive based Zen boasts an immense storage capacity of 60GB - twice that of largest iPod.

    The NOMAD Jukebox Zen sports a sleek aluminum case and USB 2.0 connectivity for fast song transfers. Creative has priced the Zen at $400, $100 cheaper than Apple's new 30GB iPod.

    "We've heard from our users that they would love to see a huge capacity NOMAD Jukebox Zen to take their entire music library and their digital files wherever they go," said Creative CEO Sim Wong Hoo. "And of course they demanded a great price. With the NOMAD Jukebox Zen with 60GB we've delivered a breakthrough capacity in a portable player."

    Creative claims a battery life of 14 hours in the NOMAD Jukebox Zen, slightly higher than that of the iPod. The Zen offers the ability to edit playlists directly on the device, and a "Find" function to quality search thousands of songs. An optional FM Wired Remote is also available featuring an FM tuner and microphone.

    But despite Creative's superior capacity and lower price, Apple has leapfrogged its competitors in terms of dollar market share. According to NPDTechworld, Apple held 27 percent of the market in the fourth quarter of last year, followed by S3's Rio unit with 10 percent.

    Apple's third generation iPods debut May 2, while Creative expects to ship the 60GB NOMAD Jukebox Zen later this month.

    1. Re:Article by Textbook+Error · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Zen offers the ability to edit playlists directly on the device, and a "Find" function to quality search thousands of songs.

      The new iPods also allow you to edit playlists directly on the device ("On-The-Go" playlists), and I haven't seen a better interface yet than the iPod wheel/column browser for digging into thousands of files.

      You could previously use the iPod wheel to change the volume of the current track or scrub back and forth through it. Another neat feature on the new iPods is that you can now also enter a "rate this song" mode and adjust the rating for tracks on the fly. These ratings get passed back to iTunes next time you sync, so you can set up playlists to do things like "Whenever I plug my iPod in, automatically fill it up with random songs I haven't heard in a while that I rated 3 stars or higher".

      This press release is just basic marketing FUD - they're just touting the length of their (future) feature list, and forgetting that it's the integration with iTunes/etc that makes the iPod work so well.

      --

      Nae bother
    2. Re:Article by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      Lessee...
      Ipod: 6.2 oz (30 gig). Nomad: 9.5 oz
      Ipod: 4.1 by 2.4 by 0.73 Nomad: 75.9 x 112.6 x 24.5 mm (anyone have a translation?)

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    3. Re:Article by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 0

      Used up my last mod point this morning. Moderators, mod this post up. That ratings mode thing is too cool to be ignored, and I had no idea that it existed.

    4. Re:Article by rworne · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just remember: 2.54cm/inch, or 25.4mm/inch. I tried to get the dimensions to match up the best I could:

      Nomad: 112.6 x 75.9 x 24.5 mm
      Ipod: 104.1 x 58.8 x 18.54 mm

      -or-

      Nomad: 4.43 by 2.99 by 0.96 inches
      Ipod: 4.1 by 2.4 by 0.73 inches

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    5. Re:Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up.

    6. Re:Article by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Another neat feature on the new iPods is that you can now also enter a "rate this song" mode and adjust the rating for tracks on the fly. These ratings get passed back to iTunes next time you sync...

      Cool! I sent in that suggestion a while back. My feature, mine, mine! :-)

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    7. Re:Article by dhovis · · Score: 1

      It is worth mentioning that the 10 and 15 GB iPods are even smaller, at 0.63 inches or just 16mm thick. Which makes these models almost exactly half the volume of the Nomad Zen.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    8. Re:Article by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      3in x 4.4 x .93 inches for the Nomad

    9. Re:Article by kdoherty · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those are neither future features nor examples of FUD. I'm an iPod owner who read up a little on the Nomad recently and the Nomad playlist editing is different from the iPod's.

      The new On-The-Go playlists for the iPod allow you to add songs to the playlist and clear playlists. When you plug the iPod into your Mac for syncing, the On-The-Go playlist is automatically wiped.

      On the Nomad, you can not only create playlists, but you can name them, and they will persist on the device. I don't know about the software for Windows but I assume it syncs back the playlists from the Nomad.

      Now, I love my iPod; I bought a 10G iPod last August and just bought a 30G one when they came out last week. That said, nobody benefits from this kind of rabid, ill-informed advocacy.

      Next time you want to make an argument for the iPod against the Nomad, make sure you have all the facts. If you're not willing to do that, don't waste people's time.

      --
      Kevin Doherty
      kdoherty+slashdot@jurai.net
    10. Re:Article by jellisky · · Score: 1

      Very much so. I absolutely love changing the ratings on the fly. I recently lost my iTunes Database file to corruption. All my song ratings for my nearly 2000 songs were gone.

      I'm still recovering, but having that ability to change ratings at work (and a playlist on iTunes called "Unrated") is invaluable for reapplying that metadata.

      For those with one and the 2.0 iPod software, on the Now Playing screen, hit the center wheel button. The first time you hit it, you are able to scroll through the track. Hit it a second time and the rating pops up. Adjust with wheel, hit the center button again, and it's re-rated. :) Amazingly simple and cool.

      -Jellisky

    11. Re:Article by etan · · Score: 1

      The new iPods also allow you to edit playlists directly on the device

      The *new* iPods. While those of us owning "old Windows" iPods are left out in the cold with the MusicMatch (worst software ever -- 5 BSOD
      ripping 7 CDs) and *no software updates*.

    12. Re:Article by clf8 · · Score: 1

      WTF! How do you mod the friggen original article up to 5 for Interesting??? It's the article, it's linked at the top. Sure, no one actually reads these anymore (especially the moderators). But, I guess I can start sounding more intelligent by posting inline the article comments. Can I get modded up for common sense?

      Btw, isn't this technically copyright infringement? I mean, the text is taken directly from the article, but no mention of that is made.

    13. Re:Article by andrewski · · Score: 1

      The NOMAD Jukebox Zen sports a sleek aluminum case and USB 2.0 connectivity for fast song transfers.

      Correction. That sould actually read "The NOMAD Jukebox Zen sports a sleek aluminum case and USB 2.0 connectivity for slow, unreliable song transfers."

    14. Re:Article by Graff · · Score: 1

      Not only is the Nomad larger, it is also over 55% heavier than the iPod. Now maybe the extra size and weight don't matter to some people but when I'm carrying around a wallet, keys, cell phone, PDA, and a music player I like to cut down the bulk and weight of all those items any way I can. The Nomad may be nice but I think the iPod is better suited for my needs.

      The only way it could get better is if Apple would just make a combination cell phone/PDA/music player! I know, I know - there are some out there already but what I want is true handwriting support, not some gimped, made-up script system or a tiny keyboard. Dammit, bring back the Newton in an updated form already! :)

    15. Re:Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dump MusicMatch and buy XPlay to manage your iPod on Windows.

      Wont help with your ripping, for that try Exact Audio Copy. Works great.

    16. Re:Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, stupid?

      the first line of the article says they're drawing windows users away from the ipod
      can't use itunes with windows, so integration doesn't exist
      just like your brain

    17. Re:Article by alienw · · Score: 1

      Newton? You have to be nuts. That device had the single shittiest handwriting recognition system that I have EVER seen. You had to write in consistent cursive for it to recognize ANYTHING, and my handwriting is neither cursive nor is it that consistent. I much prefer grafitti, thank you. Also, WinCE handhelds do have normal handwriting recognition, as well as grafitti/keyboard stuff. They also play MP3s and there are some that have phones built into them.

    18. Re:Article by jtn · · Score: 1

      Your handwriting must be HORRIBLE, or perhaps you aren't writing in the Roman alphabet. My 2100 is *fine* for both printing and cursive, and works equally well for anyone else I know with a Newton. As for a keyboard, did you never see the Newton's expansion keyboard? Please research the facts before you blindly attack anything with the Apple logo. I realize that this is a very popular pasttime on Slashdot, but try to stand out from the crowd.

    19. Re:Article by iwasyorick · · Score: 1

      you are a stupid, stupid person.

      --
      --- Tibi gratias agimus quod nihil fumas
    20. Re:Article by phriedom · · Score: 1

      "I don't know about the software for Windows but I assume it syncs back the playlists from the Nomad."

      You can pass playlists (and their associated song files) either direction with the Nomad. You can also create playlists directly on the Nomad while it is hooked up to the PC, which I do because it is easier to create playlists in the Playcenter interface with keyboard and mouse than it is to create the playlist on roaming Nomad with the small screen and 5 buttons.

      But there is no rating feature.

      My biggest gripe with the Nomad is that the Random and Shuffle features aren't random at all. If you start the same playlist from the same song, you will always get them in the same "random" order. It is easy enough to start in a different place, but you need to edit the playlist itself and change the order if it gets predictable. A minor gripe, I guess.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    21. Re:Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "facts?"

      this is slashdot.

      "waste people's time?"

      now we're talking.

    22. Re:Article by Baki · · Score: 1

      And size is one of the most important factors.

      With the speedy USB2 and/or firewire, you can quickly replace music when you are occasionally at your computer, while 15GB still is enough to have many hours of music with you for all moods and tastes.

      For me the 15Gb and small size, combined with a fast interface is just the ideal combination.

      OK 150Gb would be even better, but I would not want to sacrifice for that with 1mm or 1 gram.

    23. Re:Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old Newtons did have pretty bad handwriting. That's because they used outsourced recognition software (from the same company that eventually did the PocketPC recgonition IIRC). However, Apple fixed this in NewtonOS 2 with some homegrown software dubbed Rosetta. It worked extremely well and is now the basis for the Inkwell technology in OS X. You can tell if you have this recognizer by printing "Rosetta! Rosetta! Rosetta!" in your Newton. If you have it, it will respond "Hey, that's me!"

  5. Price by NETHED · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about us who want a good MP3/OGG player that is under 100bucks?

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Price by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      I think for those of us who want OGG players, we'll be waiting quite awhile for any portable mainstream OGG support, and even longer for it to appear in a non-luxury (i.e. sub-$HorrendouslyExpensive) unit.

    2. Re:Price by phlako66 · · Score: 1

      I'm holding out for a Neuros; according to their site they're investigating Ogg and Linux support, and they have this cool function of wirelessly broadcasting through an FM channel on your tuner. http://neurosaudio.com/

    3. Re:Price by tasidar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What's wrong with a USB Flash Drive/MP3 Player?
      Granted, it doesn't have OGG support, but it's small (in more than one way), stylist, and under $100US.
      It even uses a Lithium-ION battery.

      Disclaimer: I do not work for any of the companies mentioned.

    4. Re:Price by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about us who want a good MP3/OGG player that is under 100bucks?

      You have to ride a unicorn to Shan Gri La to get one...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Price by phorm · · Score: 1

      For an Mp3 player, I'd recommend an Mp3-enabled discman. I've got one that plays Audio CD, Mp3, and VCD too (VCD is a bit off at times, but fairly good with a full-pass VCD).

      It's good if you're just looking at using long playlists of music. Many units are rugged enough for exercise (jogging, blading, I wouldn't recommend it for swimming though) - and you can fit >100 songs on a disc. If you already have existing mp3-disc plays (say, in your car, par example), it's a good addition to the family. I don't know about OGG compatability, but I'd imagine that one could be found somewhere soon.

    6. Re:Price by valkraider · · Score: 1

      and they have this cool function of wirelessly broadcasting through an FM channel on your tuner.

      There are accessories that do this for just about any player, even the iPod.

    7. Re:Price by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Well, $100 for WHAT exactly? You could get a Flash-card based MP3 player pretty cheap, but the cards will cost plenty.

      Personally, I find that Flash cards are too expensive. What I would like is a CD/MiniCD device that plays OGG.

      Most importantly, I want something with decent battery life. I want to stick one or two AA batteries in it and get 10 hours or more of continuous playback. If it has it's own type of batteries, it'll have to power it for several times longer to be feasable...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Price by blixel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about us who want a good MP3/OGG player that is under 100bucks?

      I'm not a big OGG guy myself, but I wonder why manufacturers aren't including OGG support in their players? It's royalty free so it seems like a win-win situation to me. Doesn't cost them anything to include it except a little more R&D maybe, and it's going to attract at least a few more people.

      Any thoughts?

    9. Re:Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, it doesn't have OGG support,

      Uhh... then what's the point? Read the parent again. He wants OGG.

      "Hey, check out my new cell phone. Granted, you can't use it to make calls, but hey!"

    10. Re:Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen any commercial players with ogg support?

    11. Re:Price by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is very little demand. Slashdot is one of very few places where anyone knows what Ogg is. Joe Kazaa doesn't. It's also very processor intensive (need a FPU or very powerful integer processor).

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    12. Re:Price by Delita · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do know that Philips Audio's current surveys include a question regarding the importance of OGG support for their devices. At least we know they're thinking about it. If enough of us /. geeks actually tell them that we want it, they may very well give it to us.

    13. Re:Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are accessories [apple.com] that do this for just about any player, even the iPod [apple.com]."

      Wow an accessory that supports broadcasting on a player still not supporting OGG.

    14. Re:Price by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Doesn't cost them anything to include it except a little more R&D maybe, and it's going to attract at least a few more people.

      You have to balance the amount of money it costs on development against the number of new users it'll attract.

      Outside the /. community - that number is extremely low compaired to MP3. Hell, probably even in the /. community the number is rather low (they're just very vocal).

      Therefore companies find it very difficult to justify this sort of cost for very little gain - especially to the finance department.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    15. Re:Price by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      What about us who want a good MP3/OGG player that is under 100bucks?

      Decent CD-R/RW players with MP3 and sometimes WMA decoders (sorry, no OGG) can be had for $70 or so. They're not as nifty as the hard-drive-based devices, but they serve my needs just fine.

    16. Re:Price by TeamSPAM · · Score: 1

      While I agree OGG support would be nice. The problem I had with the lower cost players was the fact that I would have to carry extra memory cards to have the ammount of music I want with me. I estimated that the cost of the extra memory cards would drive the cost of the player over that of an iPod or a Nomad.

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    17. Re:Price by .killedkenny · · Score: 1

      You can get the original 6GB Nomad Jukebox for $100. I recently bought 2 brand new units on eBay. For the price, they are fantastic.

    18. Re:Price by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was just one example... You can buy accessories that simply plug into the headphone jack - and broadcast it over FM. The one linked to was just one that Apple chose to sell for the iPod. Basically - if it has a headphone jack, you can use a FM broadcaster to pipe it to a FM reciever in the car or wherever...

  6. Problems with the Creative by Mwongozi · · Score: 1
    Well, it's quite big for a start, would certainly make a bulge in your pocket.

    But I have zero confidence in Creative's drivers. Anyone who owns a SoundBlaster card and runs Windows can attest to how crap they are.

    1. Re:Problems with the Creative by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but that does not apply to the Zen though. You'll not have problems.

    2. Re:Problems with the Creative by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      Well, it's quite big for a start, would certainly make a bulge in your pocket

      Is that a ZEN in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    3. Re:Problems with the Creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as I don't wrap it in tin foil and walk through a metal detector, I'll be OK.

    4. Re:Problems with the Creative by SkankhodBeeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough, I have run windows and Soundblaster cards since either have been available, and have never had a problem with the drivers...

      SB16 on Win 3.1x & Win9x
      SB Live on Win9x/2k/XP
      SB Audigy2 on Win2k/XP

      I'm not sure why Creative has been getting so much bad press about their drivers... What problems have people been experiencing?

      Unfortunately, I have been having a few problems getting the Audigy2 working in BeOS or Linux, heh :) (before someone points me to the link for the audigy drivers, the problem is I don't have internet at home)

    5. Re:Problems with the Creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why Creative has been getting so much bad press about their drivers... What problems have people been experiencing?

      3 words: SB PCI 128

      The whole PCI line was for the "frugal" spender, and had a 50/50 chance of working the first time out on any given computer. AMD based Windows 98 machines seemed to suffer the most for it, though I've had my share of problems on Win95/98 Intell machines (Worked in the IT department for a small sized college).

      The drivers that one could get from Creative sucked, they often didn't install correctly, and one had to go through the "remove device drivers/shutdown computer/unplug the card/reboot windows/shutdown computer/re-seat the card/install the drivers when Win98 detected "new" hardware and hope it works this time" spiel. Funnily enough, the most reliable drivers I found for this card were from Compaq's (when they were still Compaq) personal PC line, they worked with every no-name brand computer I installed them on.

      So the lesson is: Don't buy Creative's cheapest sound cards. Spend the extra $20 for the next class up and save yourself a lot of headache.

  7. It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Interesting how the iPod has become the standard by which other players are judged. Interesting that the submitter has found a player that is both larger than the iPod (a good thing) and also slightly larger than the iPod (a bad thing). Maybe being specific about when we mean capacity in GB and when we mean physical dimensions wouldn't be such a bad thing...

    1. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by snitty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is not just the iPod. The iBook is the pinicle of good battery life, small size and a full featured laptop that is sub $1000.

      Likewise, when was the last time you saw "Dell releases new laptop" on slashdot. It's almost always Apple who is making news regarding product releases on Slashdot.

      --
      Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
    2. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This pissy, empty comment is insightful?! I never have the mod points when I need 'em. And for the record, whether you find it "interesting" or not (and for whatever reason), the iPod has indeed become the standard. Sorry. Instead of sniffing and rolling your eyes, why not give us an argument as to why some other device is the standard.

    3. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. In fact, the slight shrinkage in the latest iPod almost puts me over the edge. I want a device I can slip into my pocket. If only it had bookmarks!

    4. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by alienw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's almost always Apple who is making news regarding product releases on Slashdot.

      It's not because Apple has good hardware, it's because Apple has good product designers and because Slashdot is full of rabid Apple fans who are vehemently anti-everything-Microsoft-related.

      Unfortunately, calling the iBook "full featured" is not really fair, given that its processor is a shitty and outdated 800MHz G3. Hell, some new PDAs begin to approach it in terms of speed. Sure, the shell is nicely designed, but it's extremely outdated hardware. The G4 is about a generation behind current x86 chips, and the G3 is a generation behind that.

    5. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by snitty · · Score: 1

      calling the iBook "full featured" is not really fair

      It seems to have all the features of high end laptops, screen, USB, Fire wire, ethernet, wireless connectivity, modem, optical drive, RAM and harddrive.

      iven that its processor is a shitty and outdated 800MHz G3

      How does a slightly outdated processor imply that it is missing features?

      ell, some new PDAs begin to approach it in terms of speed.
      Name one PDA which has a processor faster than 500 MHz, and from there name one that is RISC.

      Sure, the shell is nicely designed, but it's extremely outdated hardware. The G4 is about a generation behind current x86 chips, and the G3 is a generation behind that.

      sigh, I thought we were beyond this entire MHz Myth stuff. . .

      --
      Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
    6. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're misinformed (what a surprise).

      The G3 is actually a very good chip. There was a time when the high-end iBook was faster then some G4 machines with the same speed or a bit higher. Not to say the G4 is a bad chip, because it isn't either.

      Now, you say calling the iBook "full featured" isn't fair and then you start talking about processor speed, which has nothing to do with the iBooks "features." Obviously the G3 and the G4 are much slower then the latest Pentiums (sorry you didn't make any profound discoveries). Does that mean the hardware is bad? It says to me that there is something there when users are willing to pay for a machine they know is slower (and again, they do know it's slower: everybody knows it's slower).

      A last point:
      Apple is not just another Dell. Dell makes computers and in basically just a reseller beyond that. Apple creates. Perhaps just another reason why they get talked about more.

    7. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Name one PDA which has a processor faster than 500 MHz, and from there name one that is RISC.

      Do they even make PDAs with CISC interface chips? I doubt it.

      sigh, I thought we were beyond this entire MHz Myth stuff. . .

      It's possible for one type of practical CPU to run somewhat faster then another at the same clock, but if you belive a 6 year old processor design can beat a modern design running at several times the clock speed, you're far beyond 'myth' into the realm of 'delusion'

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    8. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you worship at the "Church of Steve Jobs" too!?

      if it weren't for that "Megahertz Myth" presentation at Church, we wouldn't know what to think or say!

    9. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by g4dget · · Score: 1
      It is not just the iPod. The iBook is the pinicle of good battery life, small size and a full featured laptop that is sub $1000.

      The iBook uses a processor that is years behind the state of the art--that's why it's so cheap. If you buy a G3 iBook today, I think it will have pretty limited life.

      Something like the Fujitsu LifeBook P-2000 beats the iBook in terms of features, battery life (with extended battery), size, and weight for only a little more money (if you want something really light, the LifeBook P-1000 is even smaller, but you get an external CD/DVD drive)

    10. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by snitty · · Score: 1

      The iBook uses a processor that is years behind the state of the art

      Not entirely true. Granted it is based on the G3 which is quite old, but it has gone though *many* revisions, to the point that it is close to a G4 w/o altivec.

      Something like the Fujitsu LifeBook P-2000 beats the iBook in terms of features, battery life (with extended battery), size, and weight for only a little more money

      By a little more money you mean almost twice as much, and it's a sub compact note book with a paltry 10.6" screen and a less than full sized keyboard. I don't see how it compares.

      --
      Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
    11. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by Rand+Race · · Score: 1

      A decrepit old 900 MHz G3 will eat a state of the art 867 MHz Crusoe for lunch and still have time to pick very long instruction words out of its teeth. And what feature does the Lifebook beat the simalarly priced iBook with? A 3.5" smaller screen? A quarter the video memory? And on a Rage card rather than a Radeon? Half the HDD space? 256 MB less maximum RAM?

      It is lighter and has a competitive battery life, but what do you expect with half the LCD and half the proccesor?

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    12. Re:It is both larger and maybe slightly larger! by g4dget · · Score: 1
      It is lighter and has a competitive battery life, but what do you expect with half the LCD and half the proccesor?

      Actually, it has about twice the battery life, and small size and battery life were the features the poster was touting.

      If you want a 4 pound x86 laptop with a 12" screen, there are lots of those around, and they run about twice as fast as the iBook.

  8. Zen Looks Great by artlu · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have been using a nomad jukebox 20gb for about 3yrs at about 4 hours per day in my car with not one complaint over the lifetime of the product. I plan on going for the sleeker zen when i pick up a new car shortly and run an aux-in cable to the head unit.
    The iPod is awesome, but you are paying for the apple name and commercialization. Save some money.

    --
    -------
    artlu.net
    1. Re:Zen Looks Great by nick+this · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hear lots of people say things like this. "Macs are way too expensive for the speed of the machine" or "MP3 player X is a lot cheaper than an iPod".

      I understand this... I used to believe it too. The error is in assuming that the alternatives are all essentially equal... all mp3 players play mp3's, and computers are equal save for the speed of the processor.

      That's not the case. I can't explain it other than saying that there is a design quality and esthetic that is different in the Apple products. You won't believe it until you own one, but once you do, you understand the price difference, and realize it is negligible... that in fact all MP3 players are not the same. All computers are not the same.

      I boycotted XP and switched to Mac, while cursing the increased cost. Not any more. I recognize the difference between my Mac and my PC, and I know the differences are well in excess of the cost.

      Same is true with my iPod. It's the 3rd MP3 device I've owned, and it's cheaper compared to buying other devices, not using them, and having to re-buy an iPod.

      That's my take. Hate to sound like a ravenous Mac-head, but... well... I am one. Now.

    2. Re:Zen Looks Great by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Not to bash you, but personally, I don't like the cost of Mac's either even if I do know they are superior (they are AWESOME.....). Also, I know you have an iPod (I can tell), but have you or any other iPod fan's ever touched or used a Zen? Sure, the iPod is awfully nice....hardware and software (if you use a Mac.....to use an iPod on Windows, your probably stuck with Musicmatch...UGH!). But the Zen ain't bad either. It had ALWAYS had on the fly playlists. The Zen always had file storage also (although I wish it was more integrated into File Explorer). Also, Creative and Apple aren't the only ones (thank god!). Philps is releasing a 15 GB device that looks like it might be thinner than a iPod. There are a few others, but Apple, Creative and Philips looks like the 3 major's especially since Sonic Blue is in the crapper (the Rio hard drive based plyer was expensive, slow and ....well HUGE!). So, yes I will agree, not all MP3 players are the same. Some even sound better then a iPod (the Zen). Some have a similar interface (new Philips device). For one who just wants to play MP3's anywhere, they all work just fine. The cheaper one with more abilities will end up winning unless they develop a Palm V of MP3 players (ultra thin, and at least 5 GB of storage....YUM!).

      --

      Gorkman

    3. Re:Zen Looks Great by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 1
      That's not the case. I can't explain it other than saying that there is a design quality and esthetic that is different in the Apple products. You won't believe it until you own one, but once you do, you understand the price difference, and realize it is negligible... that in fact all MP3 players are not the same. All computers are not the same.

      It's called polish. Apple polishes the poop out of their products. And that's what you are paying a little bit extra for.

      If you play a lot of games, you can see the polish in games as well. The difference between GTA3 and other games on the market is polish. Same thing with Shigeru Miyamoto's games. You can "feel" the polish in the games.

      Same thing with Apple products.

      I wish the Linux world would pick up on that.

    4. Re:Zen Looks Great by Xeo2 · · Score: 1

      You know, you always hear about people switching from PC to Mac, but never the other way around.

      Hmm....

      --
      ___ alwaysBETA.com - Hey, you've got nothing better to do.
    5. Re:Zen Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that... I had 20GB Nomad, but it was just a pain the ass from start to finish. It took forever to boot, the hard drive died (sent it back), and it was huge. I guess the Zen fixes the size problems, but since I made the Mac switch, you couldn't really get me to switch back. Actually, when I got a Mac, iTunes was better at handling the files on the Nomad than anything at nomadness.net for windows... I ended up selling the Nomad to a friend and buying an iPod. It has unbeatable battery life, a fun scroll wheel, and it runs in Japanese mode too. All in all, Apple just goes that extra little bit to figuring out what annoys computer users and then fixing it elegantly.

    6. Re:Zen Looks Great by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      I can't explain it other than saying that there is a design quality and esthetic that is different in the Apple products.

      If by "design quality," you mean "crappiness," then I agree with you. I was starting to become very tempted to try Apple products, until my girlfriend bought an iBook in September. Though she takes good care of it (at least, much better care than I take of my 4 year old Dell Latitude, which looks pretty beaten up but is still fully functional), two critical pieces have broken.

      First of all, the power supply has broken twice, though once we were able to fix it with a pair of pliars. The connector is so poorly designed, I honestly can't imagine what they were thinking. It is easily bendable (which means it would be totally smashed if one were to step, or even sit on it), and one day the pin just broke off for no reason. Cost to fix? $80, not covered by warranty. For comparison, other companies will replace your laptop's power supply for $60, and have designed the connector in such a manner that it would take a sledgehammer to break one. When I had a power supply stop working on an IBM laptop some years back, they sent me out a new supply without even demanding to see the old one to determine if the damage was my fault or theirs.

      Also, the ethernet port broke. Though my girlfriend has no memory of this, I can only assume she must have tripped over the ethernet cord at some point. That shouldn't be any big deal, I've done it dozens of times. Indeed, I think a laptop ought to be designed such that the ethernet cable can be yanked out without any damage to the port (as with the PCMCIA ethernet card on my Dell does). Whatever the case, Apple has also declared that this damage is not covered by warranty, and would cost over $800 to fix! Even worse, the lack of even a single PCMCIA port on the iBook means that it would be impossible to add an additional ethernet jack oneself.

      Apple has a lot going for it in terms of software design and asthetics. But for rugged hardware, cost, technical support and customizability, I'm going to stick with PCs.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    7. Re:Zen Looks Great by dalek_killer · · Score: 1

      Well Apple has been having trouble with its power supplies for their desktops for a couple of years now. It's not so much Apples fault as it is the manufacture of the power supplies that Apple uses. You would think though that Apple would find a better source though.
      Still I look forward to getting a G5 when they come out.

    8. Re:Zen Looks Great by andrewski · · Score: 1

      GTA:VC has polish. GTA3 was fun, but lacked polish. I will be impressed when the newspapers blowing around on the street don't blow under a building, but pile up in corners for example. Also they STILL need a better algorithm for managing traffic spawning / destruction. You can whip by a motorbike, decide to steal it, pull a rockford, and it'll be gone! It reall pisses me off sometimes.

    9. Re:Zen Looks Great by stev3 · · Score: 1

      I did 3 months ago, and am happy as a clam.

      I got sick and tired of my Apple hardware (which was under warranty, mind you) breaking, and not having Apple cover the repair costs. There is always a loophole in the AppleCare program, and bugged the piss out of me.

    10. Re:Zen Looks Great by andrewski · · Score: 1

      You obviously are retarded - you don't need to 'open up' a mac to zap the PRAM. you hold down command-option-P-R on boot (3 times to be safe)!

      I spilled a fucking 16 ounce glass of water INTO my TiG4 (DVI 666) yesterday, while it was on and plugged into the ethernet, an audio out jack, a Cinema Display, my mouse, keyboard, and belkin ADB - USB adapter (for my Apple Extended Keyboard II). I turned the fucker off, dried it out, and am using it right now. The only thing that was damaged is the MS Optical mouse.

      Apple is good at a great OS, great integration, the details. Not just slick packaging, but slick everything. Slick API, slick audio subsystem (on OS X anyway), slick networking (find me all the hordes of new PC laptops with Gigabit, will ya?), slick software installation / removal, slick compositing / rendering, and more. Think about the fact that I have NEVER had a consumer digicam fail to sync PERFECTLY with iPhoto (have tried more than fifteen kinds), never had a digicam with 1394 fail with iMovie (3 kinds), all without an ounce of effort expended downloading drivers and jerking off with Bill and Ballmer.

      So, the only conclusions are that you are retarded, or you haven't actually used a Mac long enough to appreciate one.

    11. Re:Zen Looks Great by edmo · · Score: 1

      we had to open up the macs and zap the pram to get them to boot

      if your opening them up to reset the pram your obviously doing something wrong, on the mac you hold down command-option-p-r at boot to reset the pram, if you hold it down thru 3 boots then switch to command-option-o-f you get the firmware interface(like BIOS)
      I would bet that all the last 2 G4's need is to reset the power manager
      it is true that there power supplies have been a bit defective in the G4 towers, that's why you can trade yours in

      --
      Don't save your orgasms for Heaven; Heaven knows we need them here.
    12. Re:Zen Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I understand where you're coming from. When you've paid so much for something, you need to justify that purchase to yourself somehow. And Apple certainly makes it easy, hmm? It's almost commodity hardware, and no one will ever see it (it's either in your pocket or in your hand) unless you start showing it off.

    13. Re:Zen Looks Great by Bob+The+Nob · · Score: 1

      Three words: Get a UPS.

    14. Re:Zen Looks Great by rufo · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I've had the exact opposite experience - all of the Macs I own survive brief brownouts perfectly, whereas it's my PC that barfs, shuts down, and (once) ruins hard drives.

      Just my two cents.

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    15. Re:Zen Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like she abused her iBook. Try *not* running it over with your car next time...

    16. Re:Zen Looks Great by appleprophet · · Score: 1

      I switched to PCs about 6 months ago. I was quite the maclot too (notice the name.)

    17. Re:Zen Looks Great by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Insane. It sounds more from your words that your girlfriend breaks her shit and you're both wanting Apple to pay it. Regarding the power supply I've got one and it doesn't seem to have this problem. I've heard enough end users tell me that something "just happened" to disbelieve your " it just broke off for no reason" explanation.

      When combined with the admission that you're constantly tripping over your ethernet cable (dozens of times? Jeez dude, pity any hardware you buy) and her having "no memory of this" (which sounds awful familiar to me. Do I do technical support at the same place you or your girlfriend work by any chance?) I deduce that you're both your own worst enemies and you should be restricted to buying some sort of military laptop in the future.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    18. Re:Zen Looks Great by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Depends on what he's "zapping" them with. From what I hear some Coke Classic will clean up the contacts on that ol' PRAM real quick!

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    19. Re:Zen Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are lucky if you spilled that much into any laptop and had it not completely fail.

    20. Re:Zen Looks Great by GreenKiwi · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. It's the equivalent of saying BMWs and Escorts are the same... and BMWs are bad because they cost more!

      They aren't the same, sit in both of them and you instantly see/feel the difference.

      Take them out on the road and drive them and there's no going back.

    21. Re:Zen Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why you don't have equipment to block spikes and surges is anyone's best guess...

    22. Re:Zen Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why people think you have to be married to a platform. I say use whatever you want!!

      Err...as long as it's not Windows.

    23. Re:Zen Looks Great by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      It sounds more from your words that your girlfriend breaks her shit and you're both wanting Apple to pay it.

      Why, because it breaks? Just because shit broke doesn't mean she was abusing it.

      Regarding the power supply I've got one and it doesn't seem to have this problem.

      Check the apple support boards. Her situation was far from unique, although most people had it happen after the warranty expire.

      dozens of times?

      Over 4 years, combining power and ethernet cable trips, by myself and others, yeah, probably between 12 and 24 times. If you think about it, that's really not that much, perhaps 3-6 times per year, of which perhaps 1/3rd to 1/2 were other people. Anyway, the point wasn't "we're clumsy," the point is "my Dell laptop has stood up to quite a bit of abuse." In contrast, my girlfriend has NOT tripped over her cables dozens of times, but it HAS stopped working.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    24. Re:Zen Looks Great by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I can't explain it other than saying that there is a design quality and esthetic that is different in the Apple products. You won't believe it until you own one, but once you do, you understand the price difference, and realize it is negligible.

      No, I think it's more like pretty much every apple user has rose colored glasses. Just look at the thread about the pops in the newest iPod.. all the responses are "oh, it's no big deal.. i can barely hear it"

      If you swap out Apple iPod with Nomad Zen in that article, there would be tons of Apple fans would be berating the Zen for sucking.

      I have an Apple Pro keyboard (black keys on a white/translucent base). It's a nice keyboard, except the craftmanship is crap. Keys have a tendency to repeat themselves, especially the C and the D keys (so instead of "cd .." i type "cdd ..") I paid $70 for this keyboard, and it shouldn't have this problem. Apple won't replace it because it isn't broken it just sticks from time to time. (The keys don't physically stick, it's a known timing issue in the keyboard controller)

      I'm not the only one with this problem, a bunch of my coworkers have it too.

      Apple users tend to be just as blind to product problems as windows users are to the need to reboot.

    25. Re:Zen Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto here. Nearest I can get to explaining it is an analogy: a car is not just a car. Buy a Toyota, you get reliability, reasonable performance, reasonable storage space, reasonable price. In fact, if you own one for long enough, or haven't driven better, you'll think it's the best thing out there. Until you drive a BMW or Merc, or better. Then the thought of getting back to that toyota seems somewhat jaded. Now, feature for feature they may be similar, but the mercs & beamers seem to provide them effortlessly & robustly, rather than copied add-ons.

      Apple has pedigree, most PCs and peripherals don't because they constantly have to keep up with standards, rather than set them, like Apple.

    26. Re:Zen Looks Great by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd rather my eth port break off than have the force fling the laptop across the room, breaking the LCD, the keyboard, and the HDD.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    27. Re:Zen Looks Great by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can hear the pops, and I expect it to be fixed in firmware. I think it is occuring because the sleep on the amp (which is a good idea because it saves battery power during pause) is way to sensitive.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    28. Re:Zen Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding the BMW comparison, this is always the tack Apple has taken with regards to percentages of overall market share in the computer industry. It seems to be a badge of honour for Dell and HP and IBM to trade jabs with one another over their various percentages of market share, but make the comparison to the car market, and you soon realise that Apple is quite comfortable being the BMW of the computer market, while Dell, HP and IBM trade jabs with one another over being the GM, Ford and Chrysler-Daimler. Yet nobody ever wonders if BMW is going down the tubes any time soon.

    29. Re:Zen Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Even worse, the lack of even a single PCMCIA port on the iBook means that it would be impossible to add an additional ethernet jack oneself."

      The iBook's specs are sort of online and public, so not having PCMCIA shouldn't be a factor for someone who willingly bought one. Or in your opinion, should support plans be designed such that people who break their power supply, damage their ethernet port and complain about the specifications of their laptop (which I assume they willfully bought - or maybe that's not their fault either) be rewarded and be given a free upgrade to a brand new Powerbook?

    30. Re:Zen Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Known by who? I use the same keyboard, no problems. How many people lie through their teeth on Slashdot, I wonder?

  9. Re:Now for teh Geekizoid pod! by ctishman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah? How about you take your spam and shove it up your ass, and we'll call it even.

  10. OMG! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    OK, now this is getting interesting. 60gig.

    Today: Now, if I wait just a wee little longer for the price to come down......

    Later: Yes, I'll take one of those new 4tb Zen's for $99.95 please...

    And by the time I really do get one they will be obsolete and dirt cheap on ebay... ;-)
    Ah the joys of playing the waiting game!

    1. Re:OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      adding a smiley emoticon to your post does not make it funny. you shouldn't have bothered to post this in the first place

    2. Re:OMG! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      go take a midol and sit down for a while.

    3. Re:OMG! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, the emoticon is for humor impaired types like yourself..

  11. All i want by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is a cheap version of ipod that sports maybe 1GB and has an insanely long battery life. What kind of insane moron needs compressed audio with 60 GB of room.

    Maybe the next logical progression would be to sport a small plasma screen and play dvd's and divx. These things already had enough room.

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:All i want by numark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      iPods can be used for more than just music. Lots of people also use them for transferring data back and forth. Imagine having in your pocket an entire backup of your hard drive, so all you have to do to recover your files is connect the device to another computer, download the files, and go on your way. It's pretty hard to find anything else quite like that.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    2. Re:All i want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      See....Archos Jukebox Multimedia 20GB hard drive. Has video playbeck and a small screen.MPEG-4 SP with MP3 stereo sound, near-DVD quality. Resolution CIF-352X288 @ 30f/s. AVI file format, reads XviD and DivX(TM) 4.0 & 5.0.
      Also plays MP#'s AND RECORDS IN MP3!!!!
      Just to let ya know it also takes still pics and VIDEOS !!! All this for $359.00 Oh yes interface is USB 2.0.

    3. Re:All i want by mufasio · · Score: 1

      I have an Archos Jukebox Studio 10 (that's 10GB) and I just so happened to purchase it at about the exact time my internet access was cut off b/c we were about three months behind on the bill(i live at home with my mother and can't afford to move out). Anyways I have found my archos jukebox indespensible as I download files from the internet at my girlfriend's house and transfer them to my home computer. I still miss having an internet connection but being able to easily download files on another computer and transfer them to mine without having to deal with cd-rw's has made it much more bearable.
      This reminds me, I need to save up to catch up on the internet bill so that I can have it back for the summer.

    4. Re:All i want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just so happened to purchase it at about the exact time my internet access was cut off b/c we were about three months behind on the bill

      wtf? Does anybody else see this as uncommonly stupid?

    5. Re:All i want by natmsincome.com · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing so I went with the 10Gig instead of the 20Gig (Second Generation). I've found out that once you have one it's easy to use it. I now wish I paid the extra.

      What uses up more than 10 Gig you may ask?
      ....
      Audio books! I've been listening to a number of audio books. Most of the audio books I have are either a single files that's atleast 300MB and goes for 10+ hours or a collection of 10MB files each going for 10 to 30 minutes. If you get some series (Dragon Lance, Lord of the Rings, etc) they can easily use up 1 for part of the series.

      Technically You only need 1 Book on at a time the same can be said for music(you only need 10 hours of music) but what you want is choice.

      Anyway here's a summary of what I have on my iPod: *50% music
      *30% talking books
      *10% monty python, random quotes, sayings, one liners, stand up comedy
      *10% free/changes constantly


      There was an article on on slashdot Here and here's a site with free audio books Here if you don't want to use a p2p network.

    6. Re:All i want by ThomasFlip · · Score: 1

      The HD size does matter ! Tonnes of people use these things for storing files. Also, people like to copy files directly from CD's in the form of a wav file. With 60 gigs of HD space thats 100 full CD's compared to 50 for the ipod.

      --
      If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
    7. Re:All i want by lmfr · · Score: 1
      "What kind of insane moron needs compressed audio with 60 GB of room."

      One like me...

    8. Re:All i want by mufasio · · Score: 1

      wtf? Does anybody else see this as uncommonly stupid?

      What's stupid? That I bought it at about the same time it got cut off? or that it was three months behind? I didn't know it was three months behind, I offered to pay the bill several times but my mom refused and I had already bought the archos jukebox before it got cut off. If I would have known I would have put the money for the jukebox towards paying the internet bill but again I didn't know. Hope that clears things up. Anyways the archos jukebox rocks!

    9. Re:All i want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ipod is a hard drive based MP3 player. Limiting it to 1GB is incredibly stupid considering that it started life at 5GB. I also don't think hard drive capacity really impacts battery life all that much.

    10. Re:All i want by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      Great point and the guy that responded to you has no clue..

      Some of us just want an mp3 player not a portable backup. How long are you going to be away from your computer anyhow? I see my computer at least once a day (we have a strong relationship, plus i have to offload digicam pics). Currently there are no solid state mp3 players in the 1-2gig range.. sure you could go with an mp3 cd player, but they are a pain (burning disks, they can skip and are far from small).. the smart media / compact flash suffer from small storage that is not cheap (well compared to a hard drive)... Course we could see this change if those couple inch big 2gig hardrives evolve from the vapour (sorry couldn't find the article).

      If someone produced an mp3 player in the medium storage range i'd snap it up for sure.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    11. Re:All i want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live with your mom and you have a girlfriend.

      Either you're 16 or you and your girlfriend are really ugly.

    12. Re:All i want by mufasio · · Score: 1

      18 actually, I'm a senior in high school. and no she is not ugly :)

    13. Re:All i want by jred · · Score: 1

      I moved from a cd-based mp3 player to an Archos Multimedia 20, and it's the best thing I ever did. It's convinced me to move to usb2, that's for sure :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  12. Ogg by vslee · · Score: 1

    The Creative website does not mention anything about playing OGG... While the iPod doesn't have OGG support either, it would be very useful.

    1. Re:Ogg by tupps · · Score: 1

      As far as I can see the creative site doesn't mention this product at all. All they have listed is the 20gb version.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
  13. Can it record? by mrjive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The selling point for me is if it can record like the Jukebox 2/3. This is key when you want to record your dj sets at clubs or parties (which I have done many times using the older Jukebox models).

    --
    If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
    1. Re:Can it record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new iPods have stuff in the firmware that refers to both mono and stereo recording. You can record in mono by using the left headphone as a primitive mic right now actually. It hasn't been officially added to the iPod feature set yet, but I would expect it within the next month or two along with a firmware update.

    2. Re:Can it record? by sebi · · Score: 1

      According to this page the zen is capable of recording when you get the 'optional FM wired remote.' According to this post the iPod is rumoured to be able to do the same via a yet to be announced accessory. What I can't tell you is if either of the gadgets will record into a compressed format. With longer DJ sets that might be the deal-breaker.

    3. Re:Can it record? by WatertonMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The new iPods have the hardware to record and purportedly will have a microphone coming out in June.

    4. Re:Can it record? by mrjive · · Score: 1

      Right. The strength of the old Jukeboxes is the ability to run a linein straight from the mixer, and record for hours on end (on the 20G model, that amounts to about 28hours as raw wav or 200 hours as 192kbit mp3).

      If the only thing that the Zen can record is FM signals, then I'm not interested. Why they would remove the feature of being able to do line-in recording is beyond me.

      --
      If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
    5. Re:Can it record? by sebi · · Score: 1

      I was curious about the whole FM-remote deal as well. The chart I linked to in my previous post lists two features: Recording FM (yes, via the remote) and recording (yes, via the remote). I can't find any additional info on this fabled remote, though (I didn't look very hard, but it is not listed under the zen's accessories). I would hope that it comes with a line-in port. Without that the recording feature would be rather useless. Recording from radio while on the go is a feature I can't imagine anybody would find even remotely useful.

    6. Re:Can it record? by astrox · · Score: 1

      The new iPods have the hardware to record and purportedly will have a microphone coming out in June.

      Creative probably won't have all the parts for recording until June either.

      But the real question is Does it record to AAC? What kind of encoding 'power' would that take to record in real time, and - if it is feasible - would it eat up the battery in just a couple hours?

    7. Re:Can it record? by Rosenkavalier · · Score: 1

      A key difference: the Nomads have digital inputs, while the iPods will only have analog inputs (from what I've read so far). So if you're wanting to record from a digital source, the iPod requires an extra step: D-to-A, then A-to-D.

      One real world use for the Nomad's digital input is for very-high-quality recording -- check out this A-D converter. The quality of this would far exceed the iPod's built-in A-D converter.

  14. Except the iPod WORKS by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    Okay, I know I was reaching anyway when the Zen (and libnjb) would not place nice on my linux box...but not working on a fully-updated XP box (lacking USB 2) is not acceptable.

  15. Re:I'll go for the cheaper one this time... by ghutchis · · Score: 1


    Well, there's always something with more features and cheaper just around the corner. But the iPod is here and it's slick and has fast data transfer.

    Oh, and yes, you can easily update the firmware to the iPod. Both the firmware and iPod software have been updated several times in the last year.

    -Geoff

  16. My two cents on MP3 players by Gogl · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Creative is the king when it comes to sound quality. After all, they do happen to make sound cards as well.

    To my understanding, the Zen is just a smaller Nomad Jukebox with slightly less features. I believe that Creative tends to go with Firewire rather than USB2 (most of the Creative Soundcards also include firewire ports these days), although I'd expect this new player to include both.

    I've strongly considered buying a hard drive player, but I'm slightly worried about failure. It'd be nice to move my mp3 collection over to a 60gig player and free up some space, but what if the player gets fried? I suppose I could burn backups to CD too, and I suppose I should anyway, but regardless harddrives are very potentially faulty things.

    That, and I only want to buy a player that I can plug in and have it show up as an external hard drive. No iTunes, no MusicMatch Jukebox, none of that nonsense. I want to load my tunes on myself, I don't want the player to depend on id3 tags (as many of my mp3s have poor id3 tags), I just want it to use filenames and folders and behave like a sensible external hard drive that also happens to play mp3s. I believe the Archos jukeboxes do this, but I don't know about any other hard drive based players.

    And lastly, I believe the iPod has the Zen beat in battery life. Form factor wise, Mac fanboys will slobber over the iPod and say that anything else sucks, but personally I think the Zen or even the Archos are just fine in terms of appearances and usability.

    If this new Zen can plug in just like a hard drive, and it really is 60gb for $400, I might have to pick it up myself. 60gb is about the largest I trust hard drives anyway, much less portable ones.

    1. Re:My two cents on MP3 players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is this a troll? Because it dares to poke fun at Mac users? Sheesh. /. really has sold out to Apple, it seems.

    2. Re:My two cents on MP3 players by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      your logic is somewhere along the lines of : microsoft makes the most popular OS, so it must be the best.

      in fact i have seen several reviews of the audigy versus other cards that show it is both overpriced and incorrectly advertised.

      most creative products have serious issues with a larger-than-it-should-be percentage of motherboards.

      plus, creative has screwed me on two products, a nomad II and my audigy. their RMA people are a bunch of idiots. ill never buy from them again. period.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    3. Re:My two cents on MP3 players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's not the logic at all. It's a matter of looking at the actual signal to noise ratio and such, and I know for a fact that Creative MP3 players are the best for that. Even better than the vaunted iPod.

      This has nothing to do with whether or not Creative cards have issues with certain motherboards or if you got screwed. They have plenty of satisfied customers, I'm sure they'll live without you.

    4. Re:My two cents on MP3 players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you didnt actually read the article before you commented.

      You wrote: "And lastly, I believe the iPod has the Zen beat in battery life..."
      The article says: "Creative claims a battery life of 14 hours in the NOMAD Jukebox Zen, slightly higher than that of the iPod."

      You wrote: "I believe that Creative tends to go with Firewire rather than USB2..."
      The article says: "The NOMAD Jukebox Zen sports a sleek aluminum case and USB 2.0 connectivity for fast song transfers."

      And as far as your concerns about plugging in and being viewed as an external hard disk, the iPod can do this and I am sure the Zen will be able to as well.

    5. Re:My two cents on MP3 players by radish · · Score: 1

      Creative is the king when it comes to sound quality. After all, they do happen to make sound cards as well

      *splutter*

      Now look what you made me do - I spluttered coffee all over my keyboard. I'm sorry, but "+1 Insane" anyone?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:My two cents on MP3 players by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      That article's assertation that the Nomad has better battery life than the iPod is, from experience, just false. Unless they managed to find a 60 gig HD that's 3 times as efficient as their 20 gig HDs.

      And what the author of the previous meant was, having the mp3s show up in a directory he can just stick files in. I don't think any developer that expects to allow searching or browsing based on ID3 tags can do this. It would require the player to read, detect and process the tags after you'd copied them, and keep some kind of internal list managed. That takes a LOT of processor power, more than the average MP3 player's DSP should be expected to perform. After all, ID3 tags can be as big as 10k. Having a running list of information on a player program, which can be used to manage this data and format it for the poor dumb player is a Good Thing...and iTune's methodology (either drag and drop, or sync...i choose d&d) for doing so is great.

      Of course, if you want to just stick things in directories and treat them as albums in alphabetical play order like we did in the stone ages, Philips makes some great MP3CD players.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    7. Re:My two cents on MP3 players by cortez · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it's not "just like a hard drive," no matter what creative or their fanboys say. I have a NJB3 and creative wants you to use their crappy proprietary PlayCenter app and a special file manager program to load files to and from the device. You can get the Notmad program people above talked about (thats what I did) which makes it a lot more tolerable because at least its integrated into explorer, but you still won't be able to access your zen as a Z: drive.

      --
      Paizurishitetai desu ka?
    8. Re:My two cents on MP3 players by NetFu · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I have to disagree on this. I just bought an iPod 15gb -- it's my first Apple MP3 player, but my 5th MP3 player overall. When it comes to portable sound quality (using the player standalone with a *good* pair of headphones):

      Rio -- OK sound quality, but not a replacement for a good CD player.
      Archos -- Incredibly crappy sound quality and buggy interface; it's definitely better as an external hard drive an anything else, which makes sense when you look at their other products.
      Creative Nomad -- OK sound quality like the Rio, but still lacking something when compared to a standard portable CD player.
      iPod -- The best sound quality I've ever heard in a portable music device - it's better than most of the best ones I've ever had; the interface is very slick.

      Oh, and I'm an IT guy who uses Windows, Linux, and BSD PC's everywhere, so I am certainly not a "Mac fanboy".

  17. Slam Dunk? by oaf357 · · Score: 1
    Isn't this a fairly easy choice. More storage, lower price = easy sell IMO. Right?

    As for CD MP3 versus HDD MP3 players my mind isn't made up yet.

    1. Re:Slam Dunk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More storage, lower price = easy sell

      Yes. Just like the Crown Victoria station wagon

    2. Re:Slam Dunk? by oaf357 · · Score: 1

      We're not talking cars but if the Crown Victoria station wagon was better than a Mercedes Benz, I'd drive it.

    3. Re:Slam Dunk? by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

      But it isn't.

      And the Zen isn't better than the iPod either. The analogy still holds.

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  18. Should add AAC by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not being a smart-ass. If they can put in WMV (which I wouldn't use, being an OS X/Linux guy, so I have no point), they should put in Ogg and AAC, since AAC is based on the MPEG-4 codec.

    Then I could actually sit at my desk and try to decide - iPod, or Zen. If for no other reason than I like competition.

    1. Re:Should add AAC by yomegaman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here is a rather amusing message I saw over at hydrogenaudio.org about AAC support on the Nomad series.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    2. Re:Should add AAC by JebusIsLord · · Score: 2, Informative

      Haha, that was I who posted that! I was about to do it again actually in this thread... Everyone please read it! Might make you think twice about supporting them in the future. Granted I think this Harvey fellow is a moron with no real access to the facts, he is still a company representative.

      --
      Jeremy
    3. Re:Should add AAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A jewish nigger? What has this world come to...

    4. Re:Should add AAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't heard of Jim Rome

    5. Re:Should add AAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Sammy Davis Jr. was half black, half puerto rican, and jewish.

      And he was still worth more than a truckload of racist fucktards.

    6. Re:Should add AAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think we were both joking. At least I hope HE was...

  19. Re:I'll go for the cheaper one this time... by valkraider · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh, and let me guess, can you not get firmware upgrades for the iPod? Because of course we all know how Apple feels about upgrades...

    Hmm. I updated mine just fine...

  20. Neuros set to support Ogg by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Informative

    Neuros Audio hopes to do just that soon with linux support as well.

  21. Re:Now for teh Geekizoid pod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you bright? witty? Do you have friends that laugh at your jokes? We at lrse hosting" are looking for a select few individuals to join our ranks at the internet's premier source of wit and style.

    Do YOU have what it takes? Register TODAY and FIND OUT!!!!

  22. Size matters by mrklin · · Score: 5, Informative
    Slightly larger?

    According to my calculation, the Nomad Zen is over twice the size (volume) of the iPod and 60% heavier.

    Apple iPod (Gen 3)
    103.5mm(H)*61.8mm(W)*15.7mm(D) = ~100k cubic mm and 158 grams

    Nomad Zen
    112.6*75.9*24.5 = ~209k cubic mm at 268g.

    Furthermore, the set of functionalities that the two players offer are different (sync vs FM capability for example) so their value to user is highly different.

    While I like iPod to support other formats (WMA and Vorbis Ogg) but I am satisified with AAC and MP3 for now.

    1. Re:Size matters by bengoerz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While you may be right about the volume, I think it's a bit misleading to say "twice the size" when it's only twice the volume. (Though, thank you for pointing out that your calculation was for volume.)

      Consider this:
      1.3*1.3*1.3=2.197
      So a 30% increase in each of the dimensions could more than double the volume of an object.

      As for the increased mass, just consider that it is probably carrying around double the platters of the iPod, and an internal disk drive enclosure to hold them.

      All in all, I'd still call it only "slightly larger," and I'd definately deal with the bulk for the added benefits of storage and price.

    2. Re:Size matters by mrklin · · Score: 2, Informative
      P.S. A good writer always cite his sources:

      Apple - Gen 3 iPod stas from Apple Japan

      Nomad - Nomad 20GB version

    3. Re:Size matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, your calculation is right. But I miss your logic, are you saying that increasing an object by 30% in each dimension does not make it twice as large? It seems to me a lot easier to mention size according to volume instead of explaining which dimensions are larger and which are not.

    4. Re:Size matters by brarrr · · Score: 1

      Well, as anybody can tell you, it is not the size or weight of the device, but the density that really matters. The nomad totally blows away the ipod with its lower density. Just so that I can be more 'leet with my ipod, I make sure to put it in a syrofoam packed box to bring that old 'rho down.

      Talk about extreme case modding.

      --
      to email me: take my /. handle and append .net preceded by charter.
    5. Re:Size matters by andrewski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, the Nomad Zen has USB 2.0 instead of Firewire. Bleargh!

    6. Re:Size matters by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I made those comparisons the first time I heard about the Zen.

      One thing to add is that the new iPod has a nice dock, wired remote, three games and an alarm clock app.

      Really, I think the difference in cost is mostly using a drive that is larger in physical size, so it is cheaper per gigabyte.

      I think both units can serve as a removable storage system, but if you only listen to music, 30 gigabytes is a lot.

    7. Re:Size matters by edmo · · Score: 1

      Size(Physical) is one of the most important features if you cary your mp3 player around w/ you...
      another plus for the ipod is it's durability. Trust me on this one, doesn't matter how much bigger(gb) the drive is, if it go's crunch the first time you it on a 10 ft whipper it's worthless

      --
      Don't save your orgasms for Heaven; Heaven knows we need them here.
    8. Re:Size matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Volume is irrelevant here, and so is mass. It's just about one centimeter / half an inch bigger in each dimension. I can not tell the difference between 100g and 200g in my pocket. My pockets can stretch to accomodate the extra volume, especially considering that it has twice the capacity of the iPod and is significantly cheaper.

    9. Re:Size matters by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Also, the Nomad Zen has USB 2.0 instead of Firewire.
      The new iPod has USB 2.0 and Firewire.
      Bleargh!
      Gesundheit.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    10. Re:Size matters by Brat+Food · · Score: 2, Informative

      The pictures Above are of the old ipod.. the new one makes the old one look bulkey. basically take off the white top portion, round all the corners and shrnik it just a bit and that new ipod

      theres also something to be said about the new ipods face being completly sealed... ie. no more dustbunnies (dont know if it comes with covers for the IO ports)

      and, really, the ipod just is a marvel of engeneering, design, and ergonomics compared to anythying else. Also take in to account its VERy easy to do all song functions blind with one hand (scrubing, volume, rev/ff play stop)

      --

      "Stuff... In my home!? NEVER!" - Zim on Invader Zim
      "I want the toilet seat!" - Little Dog on Two Stupid Dogs
    11. Re:Size matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a good karma whore always breaks their post up to try to double up on mod points.

  23. Already been done... by gimlix2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    nomadness.net has had postings in its forums about hacking and upgrading the Jukebox Zen back in December 2002 / January 2003.

    More recently, a guy has created a complete guide to upgrading your Creative Labs Jukebox Zen to 30/40/60GB.

    Enjoy!

    1. Re:Already been done... by Erik_ · · Score: 1

      I purchased a Personal Jukebox PJB100 in October 2000. It was probably one of the first harddrive based mp3 players with 6Gb. As of a December 2002, I upgraded the same player with a 60Gb (Toshiba GAP 60Gb 2.5" Drive) drive. I used to be able to listen 10hours on those accu it came with, now I'm down at 6hours.
      What is important to consider between the different HD players (after the size) is what kind of medium they use. I believe IPod's use a 1.8" drive, while the PJB100 and the Zen use 2.5", so they will be cheaper and boast larger drivers...

  24. Apple's new music service by Starky · · Score: 1

    If you have a Mac and you want to try Apple's new (legal) music service, the complementarity between your Mac, the iPod and easy-to-get, legal music would be enticing.

    --
    -- My choice of computing platform is a symbol of my individuality and belief in personal freedom.
  25. Well... by JanusFury · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know. That's a great price, but it's a Creative product so I have a feeling it's not as good as it sounds.

    See, I've used Creative audio products since the days of the original SoundBlaster... and Creative really doesn't do as good of a job as they used to. These days they have horrible drivers, false advertising, and practically nonexistent tech support. They release a new driver update around every six MONTHS, even when there are dozens of outstanding bugs to fix; and cards like the Audigy barely did half of the things they advertised on the box and on websites.

    So anyway, this thing sounds cool... but if I were you, I wouldn't buy one without finding out a LOT about it and making sure I'm really getting my money's worth. You really can't trust Creative anymore.

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
    1. Re:Well... by romkey · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I've had some pretty bad experiences with Creative... they've been among the worst companies I've dealt with in terms of posting drivers on the web, and their tech support people just don't seem to care.

      I also tried a one of the first and second generation hard drive Nomads and they had terrible problems (miniscule battery life, awful buggy software that crashed constantly while storing music on them) that Creative never addressed.

      It would take a lot for me to decide to give them another shot.

    2. Re:Well... by bokane · · Score: 1

      I have to say, in support of Creative here, that I've had a Nomad Jukebox 3 since last July, used it near-daily, in hardship conditions (-30 C weather, occasional dropping, etc), and found it to be a solid device with great sound output. I'm tempted to sign up for one of the new Zens, but honestly, I'm already pleased enough with my Jukebox 3 that I don't see the need just yet.

  26. What about Vorbus? by mE123 · · Score: 1

    Will it play Oggs? They released the Integer only version of the codec months ago.

    If I can't play half my music, I don't care how big the harddrive might be.

    ------
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

    1. Re:What about Vorbus? by Segod · · Score: 1

      No, but this will as soon as it's released. Previous /. story here

    2. Re:What about Vorbus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you knew when you encoded your music that you were using a poorly supported, alternative codec with a tiny userbase.

      Why are you whining now? I would rather have any of the iPod/Nomad's features than support for some fledgling codec, and so would 99% of other users. The companies who produce hardware know this.

      If you want hardware that supports the open source codec of the week, make it. That's the open source way, right?

    3. Re:What about Vorbus? by mE123 · · Score: 1

      if they let me mess with the firmwear, I might well make one

  27. Battery Life by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

    Dumb question, as I don't see it answered in the Betanews, and someone who uses a Nomad might be able to answer.

    The batteries - AA, or rechargable? I once had a Jukebox that was suppose to be able to charge via a separate AC adapter, but it would be nice if it could charge via USB 2.0. Just because I like less cords.

    1. Re:Battery Life by questionlp · · Score: 1
      According to the Zen's spec page, the Nomad Zen has a built-in LiIon battery and probably can't be charged via USB 2.0 or via FireWire like the iPod can. I think the FireWire version of the Zen uses a 4-pin i.Link-style connector (FireWire without power).

      The Nomad Jukebox 3 has two spots for LiIon battery packs (which are rather small and fairly light) and uses a 4-pin FireWire connector, so no power pins for charging that way.

    2. Re:Battery Life by Finque · · Score: 0, Troll

      You can't charge through USB 2.0, as it's not powered. Apple's version of USB 2.0 for their Windows iPods comes with a seperate cable just for powering. So in other words, USB 2.0, even though it's faster than FireWire, still kinda sucks in comparison.

    3. Re:Battery Life by GimmeFuel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Specifications page for the 20GB Zen states it has a built-in rechargable lithium-ion battery, and is powered off DC 5v in. I'd assume the new one uses the same system.

    4. Re:Battery Life by dadragon · · Score: 1

      I think the FireWire version of the Zen uses a 4-pin i.Link-style connector (FireWire without power).

      I doubt it. The SB Audigy sound card has a "SB1394" port on it which is just 6 pin firewire, exactly like the one on the side of my iBook. I'd bet that Creative would use the same ports on all its devices.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    5. Re:Battery Life by cleveland61 · · Score: 1

      Since when is USB not powered? Did IEEE change the spec?

      Anyhoo... I'm looking at my directions for the Creative Nomaad Jukebox Zen (Catchy name, eh?) and you can inded charge from the usb port. The unti must be off to do so. The Zen also come with an ac adapter. Maybe in case someone wanted to recharge the unit while they away froma computer?

    6. Re:Battery Life by questionlp · · Score: 1

      Nope... I have the Jukebox 3 and it only has a 4-pin FireWire plug on the back and the Zen ought to be the same way.. Reading through the FAQ, it does seem that the Zen does support charging via USB.

    7. Re:Battery Life by questionlp · · Score: 2, Informative

      BTW - here's the picture of the Zen. The USB port is a miniature plug and the 4-pin SB1394 (they include a 6-pin to 4-pin cable in the box) plug to the right.

    8. Re:Battery Life by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 3, Informative

      The USB 2.0 only version of the Zen does charge off of the USB. Just make sure it's off when it's plugged into the port. If it acts weird (won't turn on) when you unplug it, just use a paper clip in the reset hole. No problems! :) I do wish they'd fix that bug, but it's one I can live with. I know, the iPod doesnot need a reset hole.....whatever, I still love my Zen and I am only doomed to use Playcenter since I do not want to pay for Notmad. PLaycenter is not that bad....if you only use it to manage your Zen. I never play music in it.

      --

      Gorkman

    9. Re:Battery Life by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Or if you aren't drawing enough power from your USB hub/dasiychained device.

    10. Re:Battery Life by SunBug · · Score: 1

      I have a Zen 20GB USB 2.0.

      The Zen comes with a LiON battery that lasts about 11-12 hrs at a decent volume (between 9 and 11). The USB 2.0 version can charge from the USB cord.

      It has a nice interface that boots up in about 2 seconds. I can do whatever I want to with the jukebox, while it is playing a MP3 without any noticable slowdown or lockout. The buttons are well placed, and the unit itself is fairly well constructed.

      This is my 4th creative player, and I can't really speak highly of their quality. The zen is leaps ahead of the 3 jukeboxes I owned. But it is far behind the iPod, judging from the limited use of the iPod I've had with in-store demos.

      My first jukebox's stop button stopped working. Something cracked, broke, or whatever and fell behind it. Took it back to best buy with no problems.

      My second jukebox liked to randomly double the volume of the playback for about 1/10th of a second. I almost threw it across the room. Several times.

      My third jukebox had a messed up jack in the back for the multi-speaker output. I never used those jacks, but when I noticed they were broken, Best Buy said it was too late to fix.

      I got a $300 cert to Best Buy from work as a Christmas bonus. Gave my friend the jukebox and bought the Zen, after doing some research.

      The Zen's menu button is now a little.. wonky. It feels like something is catching, probably a spring off center or whatever. I've taken the unit apart as far as possible without voiding my warrenty, but don't see anything wrong with it. It is just a minor annoyance, and I don't want to go through the warrenty process for it.

      On the upside, the Zen has really nice sound quality. The headphones it comes with are crap. Use something like the Sony MDR-CD180, and you'll be glad you bought the Zen.

    11. Re:Battery Life by Belgand · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with the specifics, but I would be inclined to believe that it does. Personally I own an Audigy and an iPod and they don't work very well together. Creative apparently diverges from the 1394 standard thus the "SB1394" label. This is designed to work mainly with Creative devices although I doubt they've actually managed to do anything significant to it. That said iPod users frequently complain about it as the iPod can be rather touchy about the Firewire chipset it'll work with. Mine is just this side of usable (times out every so often and I get a badly transfered song, this also leads to slower transfer speeds in general).

      To check into the iPod just a bit beyond the hype and positive comments check out the iPod support page (Windows iPod, but you can get to the Mac version from the same page). There are frequent problems with battery usage (it never turns off, just goes into a sleep mode which has often had serious power drain problems), connecting to the computer, firewire cards, etc. Not to mention the terrible (more or less complete lack of) manual and abyssmal software (MusicMatch Jukebox... an old version too as the newer ones apparently don't work. ephPod works much better and has many features that were excluded from MusicMatch, but sorely desired. I've gone terribly off-topic, but I do love my iPod despite it's faults.

    12. Re:Battery Life by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem isn't their firewire implementation, it's the fact that Creative plays fast and loose with the PCI 2.1 spec and so does Via. If you bring the two together they don't work well at ALL. I had to install a ton of patches just to get audio playback to work well on my KT133a based mobo. I finally gave up on trying to get my iPod to sync via the Audigy and got a 3 port Belkin card barebones online. Haven't had a single problem since =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    13. Re:Battery Life by gig · · Score: 1

      Man, that's lame. You explain that the Creative 1394 is not standard and even note the "SB1394" label instead of "IEEE 1394" and you think that the fact that iPod doesn't want to work well with it is the iPod's fault in even a small way?

      FireWire is such old news at Apple. I have a March 1999 PowerMac here with FireWire on it. I have a 1999 digital camcorder with FireWire on it.

      Me and about 10 of my friends have iPods and Macs and we are united in how absolutely problem-free the whole thing is. Macs don't even crash anymore, never mind not being able to hook up to a FireWire network. The idea of a non-functioning FireWire port is ... I have never seen or used one and I have at least 20 FireWire devices here in the room with me right now and have been using this stuff constantly for four years.

      Your problem is Creative and Microsoft's culture of low, low quality and good enough to last six months attitude.

    14. Re:Battery Life by gig · · Score: 1

      USB doesn't have as much power as FireWire. The power in FireWire was meant specifically to power high-speed storage devices and cameras and media converters. USB power is for keyboards and mouses and it's quite a bit less.

      USB (even 2.0) doesn't have enough power to charge the iPod. It could probably power an iPod-type hard disk, but not also charge a Lithium-Polymer battery that takes a 12-hour charge in about an hour.

      What a USB 2.0 MS Windows user does with the new iPod is plug the USB into their computer and plug the FireWire into the little FireWire-AC adapter that comes with the iPod. Even though it looks like the iPod Windows dock has both USB and FireWire what it really ends up being is USB and AC once you attach the little FireWire-AC apapter block. If you see one of these it is obvious.

      One nice thing with iPod power is the $39 travel kit. It's like a bunch of new heads for the iPod power adapter that enables you to plug it in almost anywhere in the world. You pop off the current head and put on "Australia" and you're ready to charge and use your iPod in Australia. It's very smart design using really basic parts to make something very simple and small that works wonders.

    15. Re:Battery Life by g4dget · · Score: 1
      You can't charge through USB 2.0, as it's not powered.

      Sure you can: USB 2.0 runs and charges some rotating media players just fine. It doesn't have as much power as FireWire, but it's enough with careful design. Hopefully, we'll see more compact and energy efficient devices than either the iPod and the Zen in the future and then this will be even less of an issue.

    16. Re:Battery Life by Belgand · · Score: 1

      By and large the problem is that the iPod seems to be very, very touchy and selective with the Firewire cards it works with. It's not limited to the Audigy. There are quite a few people with a variety of cards that have problems with it.

      As for the Mac... well... duh. I imagine that Apple would test them with the hardware that they make. That's where many people think the problem is. Apple is used to products conforming far more often. On the PC you tend to get a much wider array of hardware all implementing the same thing.

      As for the problem itself? Well... it works great, but every so often it will time out and the drive "skitters" before picking up again. This tends to introduce problems into the file being transferred. A fix for a particular VIA chipset was unofficially released that changed the timing IIRC and this has worked for many people with problematic cards.

      So no. My problem is partially expecting Creative to properly follow a standard when they release hardware to the point that it will work with devices properly. Partly that the iPod... while a great device, has problems. Microsoft? Screw that. I have XP on my box for gaming, but otherwise spend time in Slackware. Aside from XP the only thing by MS I have is their odd strategy-gaming oriented joystick-mouse lovechild thingie. I've never installed a copy of Office or anything else.

      *sigh* why do I feed the trolls?

  28. Music store compatible? by evilhayama · · Score: 1

    This probably won't affect most people, but Apple's new music store isn't going to work with the zen, unless there's some hidden aac playing ability. If aac suddenly becomes the format of choice (I doubt it) the zen is going to have to play it to level with the Ipod.

  29. Bring on the Canadian Tariff Posts!!! by ashitaka · · Score: 3, Informative

    About how they will triple the price of this box.

    They have revised the rate structure though:

    Before they proposed $21.00/GB which would have added $1,260 to the cost of this box.

    Now the rate strucure looks like:

    1 GB or less 11.1 cents/MB
    $11.50 on 1st GB
    $7.98/gb on Gbs 2 to 5
    $5.98/gb on Gbs 6 to 10
    $3.99/gb on Gbs 11 to 20
    $1.99/gb on Gbs 21 or greater

    I'll leave the calculation on a 60GB drive as an exercise for the reader.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:Bring on the Canadian Tariff Posts!!! by snitty · · Score: 2, Informative

      that would be an extra $200 for the Nomad Zen and an extra $133 on the iPod, bringing the price differeance to about $30

      --
      Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
    2. Re:Bring on the Canadian Tariff Posts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, $133 and $192, actually.

      Of course that's in C$.

      At 0.7180 (exchange rate as of this writing), that becomes $96 and $138; making it more like $600 and $540. Still a $60 difference (US), which is ~ C$84.

      Any errors in simple math are purely my own, which is why this was posted anonymously :)

    3. Re:Bring on the Canadian Tariff Posts!!! by markomarko · · Score: 1

      These haven't been legislated. They're just recording industry recommendations from a lobby group called the Canadian Private Copying Collective. Incidentally, some large tech importers and manufacturers, as well as consumers are heavily lobbying against these tariffs, through the CCFDA. I don't think they will see the light of day.

      An interim decision on tariffs for recording media can be found at here. It certainly doesn't look like the outrageous tariffs recommended are being taken seriously.

    4. Re:Bring on the Canadian Tariff Posts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 GB or less 11.1 cents/MB
      $11.50 on 1st GB
      $7.98/gb on Gbs 2 to 5
      $5.98/gb on Gbs 6 to 10
      $3.99/gb on Gbs 11 to 20
      $1.99/gb on Gbs 21 or greater

      Using that rate table, a 900 MB drive would have a tariff of $99.90, whereas a 1 GB drive would have a tariff of $11.50.

  30. Creative? No Way. by foo+fighter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's been years since I've been happy with a Creative Labs product. You have to go way back to their pre-Live! soundcards.

    Since the Live!, Everything of their's I've purchased and/or used has been flakey: 3/4 of the way done, but never quite all the way.

    I'm a person who doesn't like to settle for "good enough", and Creative's stuff is consistently a notch below "good enough" for me.

    At this point I can't imagine anything coming close to the iPod in terms of usability, features, or aesthetics. Certainly not anything from Creative.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:Creative? No Way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just a stupid pro-Linux post, but anyways: The flakey part of anything Creative always seems to be drivers. In Win2000/XP my computer would blue screen regularly because the drivers weren't well written. Hop to Linux, and using ALSA, and I have no problems at all.

    2. Re:Creative? No Way. by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Don't knock the Live! rev A. That still is a great card. Some of the later models were definately flaky though. It's all about how generic your PC was at the time too...

  31. No OGG support. by Jeedo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Personally i am not going to buy this product or any other audio player until i get support for my music files. Which are most in OGG Vorbis format.

    I really would jump at the first audio player with OGG support, or flash ROM so i could add it myself.

    Any tech-knowhow people here know why there is so little support in general for other audio formats? I heard somewhere that it was a problem of OGG taking up more FPU Power than other formats like MP3 anyone care to comment on that?

  32. What about the "Sonicblue" box? (r.i.p) by FooBarney · · Score: 1

    The new iPod is a great (if evolutionary) development, and a 60Gb Zen has me drooling, but the player I've really been lusting after is the fate-unknown Pearl from now-defunct SonicBlue. It's smaller than the iPod, and includes an Ethernet-enabled docking station. All the early reports were good.

    Alas, SonicBlue went bankrupt and sold its Rio assets to Denon, a major high-end home audio manufacturer. It's starting to look like the Pearl might never actually ship.

    Between the two (Apple and Creative), for my money, I'd take an iPod. It has a dock, supports FireWire AND USB2, is quite a bit smaller and lighter, is Mac-friendly (if you're into that sort of thing) and is truly a brilliant piece of interface work. Also: when Apple ships the Windows version of its online music store later this year, you can be sure that iPod-for-Windows will be nicely supported.

    The new Zen is bigger, but I listen to a LOT of music, and I've ripped every CD I've ever owned, plus years of Naptering and eMusic subscription, and my collection's only a little larger than 20Gb. It'll be a LONG time before I hit even the 40Gb barrier of the iPod--I can't imagine that I'd ever fill up a 60 gig drive. If you plan to use the player to shuffle around a lot of big files (graphics professionals?) in addition to using it as an audio player, then I might recommend the Zen, but 60 Gb is a LOT for just music.

    1. Re:What about the "Sonicblue" box? (r.i.p) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry?!?! All that and only 20gig!!!!

      I on average download 5-6 gig a month. I don't download music just for the hell of it, just to get the latest tracks etc but this is all stuff I want and listen to regularly.

      I'm shocked. Today alone I have 350meg!

    2. Re:What about the "Sonicblue" box? (r.i.p) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually - the Pearl continues to be developed. I couldn't find newer posts (there are some - but the search engine sucks) - user hugof at the mp3.com hardware forums works for Sonicblue. Here's the thread: http://msg.mp3.com/hardware/liststory/?topic_id=89 91&month=200303 So - it will ship. I'm waiting for it. Even if I choose another, surely the release of it will bring down the price of the Ipod and the Zen. Oh, by the way, I I should mention that MACS SUCK. Sorry.

    3. Re:What about the "Sonicblue" box? (r.i.p) by neuroking · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I have a similar situation, but most of my mp3s are encoded at 192+, which gives me around 40GB of music. Too much for the Ipods (which I was planning on getting when they got bigger drives - oh well).

      I'd also like to encode some classical, just for when I'm on the road, and wouldn't use anything less than 320 (yes, flame mr for using lossy compression on 'gourmet' music).

    4. Re:What about the "Sonicblue" box? (r.i.p) by altman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh-uh, Pearl will ship. Speaking as one of the guys working on the Pearl (hugof on the mp3.com boards), I can tell you that the Chapter 11 stuff (and subsequently being bought by D&M) hasn't even affected the schedule.

      So, if you like your portables 100Mbit ethernet enabled, with built-in webservers and java management apps (plus USB2.0 and the usual PC stuff), plus funky OGG playing, crossfading, parametric EQ, etc etc then wait for the Pearl. It has a dock with real RCAs on it, too, alongside that oh-so-cute RJ45...

    5. Re:What about the "Sonicblue" box? (r.i.p) by bazoobazoo · · Score: 1

      yeah. i have one eighty gig drive full right now just with music. :/

    6. Re:What about the "Sonicblue" box? (r.i.p) by Hinius · · Score: 1

      The Pearl has been kind of my ultimate dream player. Would you be able to divulge:

      (a) how large a hard drive it'll have
      (b) a rough ETA (3 months, 6 months)

      Thanks muchly (I'm sorely tempted by the new Ipods, but am hugely relieved that the Pearl is still coming out)

  33. Re:Can it record? Maybe 'yes' for new iPods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may get your wish with the new iPods..."As the Apple Turns" (http://www.appleturns.com/) had a tidbit yesterday that mentions a recording function buried in the diagnostic menu of the new units. A hint of things to come?

  34. Realtime Compression by SlashdotMirrorer · · Score: 0

    I believe that the time these "mass storage" mp3 devices will come into common usage and acceptance will be when they support some form of realtime mp3 compression to record to the device on the fly. I can't even count the number of times I've been sitting around and have wanted to record a good good joke I've heard, interesting lecture, or incriminating evidence on a friend. Why just the other day we were sitting around and came up with a wonderful joke involving people who read slashdot, a lack of bathing, the RIAA, a trained walrus, several assault rifles, and a copy of The O'Reilly factor. All lost to the sands of time. Good realtime compression would be an excellent feature!

  35. Re:Now for teh Geekizoid pod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Are you bright? witty? Do you have friends that laugh at your jokes? We at lrse hosting" [lrsehosting.com] are looking for a select few individuals to join our ranks at the internet's premier source of wit [sporks-r-us.com] and style [geekizoid.com].

    Do YOU have what it takes? Register TODAY and FIND OUT!!!!

  36. More than "slightly larger." by richard-parker · · Score: 1

    While the Nomad Zen is certainly a nice MP3 player with an excellent set of features, I think it is an exaggeration to say that it is only "slightly larger" than the 30GB iPod. Look at the specs for the 30GB iPod and the Nomad Zen. The Nomad Zen weighs 50% more than the 30GB iPod (268g vs. 176g). The volume of the Nomad Zen is more than 75% larger then the 30GB iPod (209 cm^3 vs. 118 cm^3).

    Is the difference all that important? Maybe not, but of the two the Apple iPod is certainly the sleeker, and that will matter to some customers.

  37. 60 Gb is pretty nifty by ulflj · · Score: 1

    You could copy a couple of your DVDs to the zen for watching at friends, directly from the unit via the usb or firewire, heck, you could even have your favorite dvd-player software on the disk to be sure that you can play the DVD-files... (Even with 5-6 movies on your 60 gig zen you have plenty of place for music left)

    1. Re:60 Gb is pretty nifty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or -- now stay with me here -- you could simply take the 2 DVDs over to your friend's.

    2. Re:60 Gb is pretty nifty by snitty · · Score: 1

      Which you could also do via FireWire (faster than USB 2.0) with an iPod as well as it supports firewire disc mode. . .

      --
      Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
  38. What about Vorbis? by mE123 · · Score: 1

    Will it play Oggs? They released the Integer only version of the codec months ago.

    If I can't play half my music, I don't care how big the harddrive might be.

    ------

    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

    1. Re:What about Vorbis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my Discman won't play 8-track tapes either. Quit your whining.

    2. Re:What about Vorbis? by mE123 · · Score: 1

      yes, but 8-tracks where bigger and less cool... while Oggs are smaller and sexyer

  39. Pocket-sized TiVO for AM/FM Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a pocket-sized MP3 player that can also record some of the better radio shows and allow me to pauses and fast forward through commercials?

    I found the Pogo Radio MyWay to do this. I haven't seen any other mp3 player that can do it.

    More about the pocket-sized TiVo-like MP3 player

  40. Big enough? by WatertonMan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    At what point are the hard drives big enough? I know a lot of this has to do with software. With iTunes I can select playlists that I'd want to listen to so easily that 10 gig is more than enough. I have 20 gig of tunes, but rarely want all of it.

    I know someone will say they have 30 gig of tunes and want all of it all the time. This to me is simple geek nonsense. You can't listen to that much in a reasonable fashion. Further needing it all probably says more about poor software and hardware than anything else. (IMO)

    I use my iPod in my car and at the gym and at work. (To drown out my co-worker's Rush Limbaugh at times) I honestly can't imagine *why* you need more than perhaps 20 gig. I honestly can't.

    If you are using it as a portable hard drive then, OK. I can understand. But the reason I like the iPod is that while it functions as a small hard drive for a few files, it is primarily a *player*.

    1. Re:Big enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The point to a larger drive is not so much that I have 20 gig to carry with me, it's that I have my complete collection with me always. No more issues of having to sync or decide what to take with me. Everything is there all the time plus it provides a great back up for my collection. The music drive on my home pc failed earlier this year. I just popped in new drive and sync'ed the Zen and still have all of my mp3's.

      You're right that I probably never need more than a few hundred megabytes in a day but it's nice to know that the few hundred I want will always be the ones that I have.

    2. Re:Big enough? by Hoeken · · Score: 1
      I honestly can't imagine *why* you need more than perhaps 20 gig. I honestly can't.


      I'm gonna take the bait, its simple...
      Bigger = Better
      --
      Educate > Enlighten > Evolve http://www.neuroatomik.com
    3. Re:Big enough? by monique · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You say, "You can't listen to that much in a reasonable fashion."

      Who are you to dictate what's reasonable?

      I have 41G of MP3s; well over 5000 songs, but I forget the exact number. I like to load the whole thing up on random and listen as I muck around on my computer. Why is that unreasonable? Just because you personally might prefer your music to have a theme-of-the-week doesn't mean I do.

      I like to have all of my music avialable because I don't know this morning what this evening's mood will be. Is it techno? Classical? Metal? Folk? I'd rather have it all available and only listen to some of it than have some of it available and want to listen to something else.

      Having your music take up a lot of disk space is not "simple geek nonsense"; it's a preference for variety and accessability.

      If I'm going to run multiple OSes, I have a choice of two machines, each running one OS, or one machine, dual-booting (or running VMWare). One choice allows me instant, fast access to both operating systems; the other is less convenient. I choose convenience. How is making sure that you have access to all your mp3s any different?

      --
      -monique
    4. Re:Big enough? by schulzdogg · · Score: 1

      I honestly can't imagine *why* you need more than perhaps 20 gig. I honestly can't.

      I have a 20G archo's jukebox, and I wish it were bigger. I listen to about 30% of that music at any given time. Lot's of stuff over and over, but occasionally I feel like something a little esoteric, and I'm stuck. I wouldn't listen to the last 40 gig's of a 60 gig player much at all, but everyonce in a while I'd really feel like I had to listen to say: Above the Law, Legends and I'd have it there. While now I have to go home and move the MP3's over from CD it would be awesome to have everything on demand.

      That's the joy of an even bigger player.

    5. Re:Big enough? by Dr.Zap · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since I am waiting for flac and shn decoders to be built in to these units I'll put in my $.02 on the storage capacity issue. I do not listen to many mp3 wma or other lossy formats. I have about 1T of music. Yes, 1 terrabyte. 60G is a good start to being able to handle my requirements.

      This is nothing new. How many times have we heard " is enough for anyone". Time almost always proves such staters incorrect. I replace my first HDD within 2 weeks because 20Mb wasn't enough. The 30Mb I got to replace it filled quickly and needed I more but couldn't afford it. This cycle has been repeated for for aboput 17 years now.

      Caveat Emptor

    6. Re:Big enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own close to 500 CDs. It's not exceptional by any means, I almost stopped buying CDs 10 years ago [*]. Otherwise I'd be over 1000 easily by now.

      [*] digression: I moved from Europe to the US then; I used to listen to a fantastic radio that kept playing new/old/strange/good music in all styles and treated their listeners with reviews/stories/analyses of the music/influences/evolution; I'd hear hard rock / pop / (some classical) / dance / (some jazz) / rock / blues / 60's and 70's rock bands / 60's and 70's experimental music / etc; It made me buy German rock, Springsteen's live 3CD set, CCR albums, dance floor music, beatles records, hardcore stuff, French punk bands, all the Cure CDs, Madonna singles, Coroner albums, Dead Can Dance, Pixies, My Bloody Valentine, Blur, James Bond soundtracks, French folk singers, Brazilian music, Japanese pop, etc... . Everything sounded good ! Here I rarely hear anything I'd want to buy, in good part because it's _always_ the same stuff, _always_, all day long. Blech...

      I own a 20GB iPod. At 128kbps AAC I guess I'll be able to store
      between 300 and 400 albums on the iPod. Not being able to store _all_ my music collection greatly diminishes the interest of the iPod.

      A good part of my interest is in having _everything_ available.

      I'll always want to listen to the albums that aren't available. That has always been the case when I carefully selected my top 20 / top 100 CDs while traveling/moving . It will happen with 400 albums available out of 500 (despite a good part of the remainder being crap albums / buying mistakes).

      I am planning to wait until a ~50GB/60GB iPod appears as the "middle price point" before upgrading. Then I'll have enough space for all my (and my wife's) music, enough spare room for the next 20 years (as if an iPod will last that long) and enough room to use to transfer/keep important files. Until then I'll juggle with the available space.

    7. Re:Big enough? by datazone · · Score: 1

      i hope you know that it is very easy to upgrade the hard drive on the jukebox. heck i replaced my 6G with a 30G over a year ago.

      --
      Its spelt "L-I-N-U-X", but pronunced as "Free Beer"
    8. Re:Big enough? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      I listen to a LOT of different music -- jazz,
      rock, classical, hip hop, soul, ska, punk, funk, folk, "alt" rock, latin, electronic -- and I usually get in a hankering for a genre. I then put the genre on random, like a radio station that ONLY plays stuff I like (with no commericals ;)). 30 gig on my iPod means I don't have to sacrifice GZA's "Words from the Genius" from my "Old School / Lyrical Hip Hop" genre just because I added Dylan's "Live from Carnegie Hall, 10/31/64" (available on iTunes store and I *DO* suggest it) to my "Live and Acoustic" genre.

      There's no such thing as "enough space," because as soon more is available I find a new way to enjoy it. And I don't think any of us should fall into the "640k is enough for everybody" trap.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  41. The Zen has always had more features and yet, by webslacker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The iPod has a more ergonomic and intuitive interface.

    The iPod has better construction.

    The iPod will work with the iTunes Music Store when it comes out for Windows later this year. The Zen won't. What does it work with, WMA's? Yes, for those wonderful WMA music stores that are all the rage nowadays.

    The iPod is kicking its ass in the marketplace, and for good reason.

    1. Re:The Zen has always had more features and yet, by JohnA · · Score: 1

      As a former owner of an iPod, I found that the Windows "solution" of a MusicMatch plugin was far from ideal. Creating and managing playlists in MM, especially when you have thousands of songs, is almost impossible, and the synchronization functionality of iPod & MM is a joke.

      Also, I would not count iPod for Windows support of the itunes music store as a given, as the previous generation of iPod supported Audible content only on the Mac platform, despite the fact that the codecs were already downloaded into the iPod with the firmware upgrade.

      For Mac users it may be a no brainer, but for Windows users, the choice is not as black & white as you make it out to be.

    2. Re:The Zen has always had more features and yet, by gidds · · Score: 1
      Remember that Apple are rumoured to be working on a version of iTunes for Windows. Yes, it's only a rumour, but Apple is always concerned about the whole user experience, more than most other companies - so even if that particular rumour doesn't pan out, I'm sure they'll be doing something for Windows users before too long.

      Even if the are the enemy... :)

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    3. Re:The Zen has always had more features and yet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that Apple are rumoured to be working on a version of iTunes for Windows.

      Let me be the first to welcome you back from your stay in a cave on the dark side of the moon. iTunes for Windows IS being developed.

    4. Re:The Zen has always had more features and yet, by gidds · · Score: 1
      That proves nothing, really. Even if the job ad is genuine, the position may not be what it seems. And even if Apple are currently planning a Windows version of iTunes, it may not work out, or they may change their minds for other reasons.

      Of course, it looks quite likely at present, but I didn't want to get shot down for wild speculation. Not even here :)

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    5. Re:The Zen has always had more features and yet, by nekura · · Score: 1

      No one's forcing you to use MusicMatch with the iPod, there are a number of superior solutions available, one being free.

      - Ephpod
      The free one, designed for transferring to the iPod and nothing more. A lot of people use it and love it, it has a simple interface, and allows you to download the weather and other fun things to your iPod.

      - XPlay
      Another product designed specifically for iPod management. It integrates with Windows Explorer and allows you to drag-and-drop your music into a special virtual folder on your iPod's hard drive in order to transfer music, a feature that a lot of people love. Optionally, you can choose to use Windows Media Player to synchronize by using a plug-in included by Mediafour, the developers.

      - Media Center
      My personal favorite solution, Media Center. It costs $40, but it's a fantastic media management program, featuring smart playlists, video playing, and a whole bunch of other features that are too many in number to attempt to mention here. Check out the 30-day trial that they have and see if you like it. It's also the fastest program on the Windows platform when it comes to synchronizing with the iPod.

      By the by, Audible files could be transferred to a 1st or 2nd generation WinniePod by using Ephpod or Media Center, and now Audible has made a program available to transfer audiobooks as well.

      --

      "Programming is like sex - one mistake and you'll have to support it for the rest of your life."
    6. Re:The Zen has always had more features and yet, by prockcore · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Remember that Apple are rumoured to be working on a version of iTunes for Windows. Yes, it's only a rumour, but Apple is always concerned about the whole user experience

      Yeah, that's why quicktime on windows is such a wonderful, well thought out application... oh wait, no it's not.. it's a steaming pile of shit.

    7. Re:The Zen has always had more features and yet, by Frac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's why quicktime on windows is such a wonderful, well thought out application... oh wait, no it's not.. it's a steaming pile of shit.

      Well if you think about it, that's probably why they didn't pick win32 developers out from the Quicktime on windows team to work on iTunes for windows, and instead chose to hire someone competent from outside of Apple..

    8. Re:The Zen has always had more features and yet, by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      Well, since Windows Media Player is a steaming pile of shit on the Mac, maybe it just shows that neither company can write multimedia players for the competition.

  42. This isn't that complicated... by sterno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the ideal MP3 player is:

    -The size of today's ipod or smaller
    -Storage capacity of 5GB+
    -FM Radio (I like to get NPR without carrying around a seperate device)
    -Good sound quality
    -Formats: MP3, WMA, AAC, and OGG
    -Price: $250

    I think this is easily achievable with today's technology. My money awaits the first company to make one.

    Zen almost gets it but too big. IPod almost gets it but no FM tuner.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:This isn't that complicated... by yamla · · Score: 1

      I'd hardly list 5GB+ as my ideal. I had a Nomad Jukebox 3 (20 gig edition) and subsequently lost it on a plane. While I didn't fill up all 20 gigs, I certainly came close. 5 gigs is probably fine if you are carrying around music for a day or a weekend but if you want enough music for, say, a vacation, 5 gigs just isn't enough. At 20 gigs or more, I can put most of my music collection on there with good quality. At 5 gigs, I'm going to be _very_ picky about what music I store on my player.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    2. Re:This isn't that complicated... by aarku · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's bullshit. The iPod doesn't have an FM tuner for the same reason it doesn't have a goddamn calender in it... oh wait.

    3. Re:This isn't that complicated... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      It all depends on the storage technology. The Ipod uses a 1.8" Toshiba hard drive which gives it a substantial size advantage over the Zen that uses a 2.5" laptop drive. Apple must have gotten a great deal from Toshiba on the drives because just the disk drive costs over $200 retail for a 5GB. The Zen is about as small as you'll get with a 2.5" drive. Compactflash is smaller but also a lot more expensive, $250/GB for flash, $180/GB for a microdrive. Just hope the prices come down on those Toshiba drives, and maybe you'll see that $250 price point.

    4. Re:This isn't that complicated... by EnVisiCrypt · · Score: 1

      I bet Apple is positively drooling over your $250 dollars.

      --


      *everything* is Orwellian to cats.
    5. Re:This isn't that complicated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/ifm/
      Th at will probably solve your stupid NPR problem...

    6. Re:This isn't that complicated... by acidwizard · · Score: 1

      With 128kbps mp3s taking up about 1 megabyte per minute, a 5 gig player gives you a little over 80 hours of music. That's way more than you need in a day or a weekend!
      While I don't think people need to settle for 5 gigs, I'd like to see more of an emphasis on size/features rather than capacity.

      P.S. Oceania is at war with Eastasia!

    7. Re:This isn't that complicated... by pillohead · · Score: 1

      You could time shift your NPR fix with streamripper plus an internet connected computer ala Tivo. Then it's a snap to download it to any portable device.

    8. Re:This isn't that complicated... by RustyTaco · · Score: 1

      Add firewire and I'll bust out a credit card. iPod + OGG for $250 would work too, but FM definatly wouldn't hurt.

      - RustyTaco

    9. Re:This isn't that complicated... by g0_p · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am seriously considering this one, because of its amazing features though its bigger than the iPod. It has some really cool features like FM radio, recording from radio or any audio source, FM transmitter, recording voice notes, bidirectional "plug'n'sychronize" (to synch your device playlists with your PC and vise versa). The site also says you can record an excerpt of a song (on the radio say..) and identify it later using their PC software. Another really cool thing is the detachable drive, in case you feel you have filled up your drive you can migrate to a bigger one easily or maybe have 2 drives. It also supports playlist editing on the device itself.

      Some problems: Supports USB 1.1 (though they say the USB2.0 version is coming in a couple of months), supports only mp3 (but again they say supporting more formats is just a firmware upgrade away). Also support for Linux and OGG is in the pipeline. The best part is however support for developers, who can put in their own customizations.

    10. Re:This isn't that complicated... by Baki · · Score: 1

      Ugh, it does not have an FM tuner? That is incredible. I almost planned to buy an iPod not even thinking it might not have an FM tuner.

      And the Zen is too big & heavy. I think I'll stick with my RAM based player (with FM tuner) for a while then.

      Have people been bugging Apple about this omission?

    11. Re:This isn't that complicated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd also like it to act as my cell phone so that I don't need to carry that around as well. Being limited to a hands-free earphone would be fine.

  43. I want a car ogg/mp3 hard drive player by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

    Like most of you, I don't spend all day carrying around devices(besides a phone). I actually work and have to try and not look like I have dialysis hooked to my groin while doing so.

    This, though, is what I need. I'd like to get this device as part of a car reciever so I can forgo having CD's slide around my car when a particular song sucks. I don't want to die in a car accident when the 15th song ends. This is the market for large storage. And no, I don't mean mounting it to the dashboard so I have yet another projectile in my car.. I mean I want it built into the reciever itself.

    The carry all market needs to be made so small, it can't be seen. And this isn't it.

    When walking down the street or driving, how many people have an iPod or whatever stuck to their waste/heads? How many people want this? How many songs could you listen to before you were to die of dehydration? Who needs this? Whether or not you want it is a different matter..

    I would like to have a car reciever that has a 120 Gig hard drive, usb2.0, and can play anything xmms can play. Is that alot to ask?

    Most people have cars, and drive to work, and drive back from work, and..- it's like an epiphany! People listen to most of their music in their cars.. Wow.

    Anyway.. I'm gonna wait for the cluetrain to hit the market before I do.

    1. Re:I want a car ogg/mp3 hard drive player by Stmpjmpr · · Score: 1

      I ran a line in to my receiver's changer input, and leave a plug in my center console. When I get in, my iPod plays from my entire library of music, right through the receiver. I get out, and I've still got all my music with me. Why leave it all in the car?

    2. Re:I want a car ogg/mp3 hard drive player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are tons of in dash MP3 HD players. Sony makes one, but it is ~$1000 for 20 gigs of copy protected music. There's a new one coming out from kenwood that uses wi-fi. It's retail price will be well over $1000. It's just cheaper to buy an ipod or zen and use an AUX jack.

    3. Re:I want a car ogg/mp3 hard drive player by ZipR · · Score: 1

      I have and Archos MP3 player and a car stereo with a line-in on the face plate. Works really well, and soungd great!

  44. Software? by benntop · · Score: 1

    Don't forget about the software! One of the big positive points for the iPod on a Mac is that it work seamlessly with iTunes. All of my playlists are sync'd automatically and I can make lists of just my highest rated music, which makes managing space on the iPod a piece of cake.

    Supreme Ruler S. Jobs has promised iTunes by the end of the year for Win32 (to get them onto the new music service). In calculating value of a portable device like this don't forget to factor in intangibles such as ease of use and integration...

    1. Re:Software? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I can rip my CD, make a playlist and then when my iPod is plugged into recharge it syncs up not only my MP3s but my calender and contacts with iSync.

      When I was working I would backup people's computers, reformat them, reinstall everything via the iPod, or run TechTools or Diskwarrior and recharge the old battery at the same time.

  45. It's "Ogg" not "OGG" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would people please stop saying "OGG"... That makes it look like it's an acronym, which it's not.

    You can read about it here, straight from the horses mouth:

    http://www.vorbis.com/ot/20030318.html#id2727368

  46. The numbers please.... by isaac · · Score: 1

    Nomad Zen:
    Size: 75.9 x 112.6 x 24.5 mm
    Weight: 268g

    ipod:
    Size: 104.1 x 60.9 x 15.75 mm (18.5 mm for the 30 gb model)
    Weight: 158g (176g for the 30gb model)

    So the Zen at ~209.4 cc's is more than twice the size and almost 70% heavier than the 10 and 15 gig ipods (99 cc's), and still nearly twice as big and over 50% heavier than the 30 gig ipod.

    That's more than a little bigger - it's the difference from dragging down your cargo pants and slipping into a shirt pocket. The new ipods are *TINY*. There is NO comparison with any other hard-disk based player.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  47. Slightly larger? by MasterVidBoi · · Score: 1

    Based on the listed specs from the manufactures, the new 30gig iPod is ~121k mm^3, while the Nomad is ~201k mm^3. Almost twice as large.

    The Nomad is also 50% heavier.

    And the kicker, the Nomad numbers are for the 20GB model, compared to the 30GB iPod. I couldn't find numbers for the 60GB version. I have no idea how the size and weight of the 60GB model compare to the 20GB model. Personally, I would bet larger over smaller.

    For those that haven't held it, the old iPod was almost identical in size to a deck of playing cards, and the controls fell right under the thumb of the holding hand, so you could hold and control it completely with only one hand. And the new iPods are a lot thinner than the old ones.

    The scroll wheel design is great. The sensitivty and accleration are perfect. I could scroll through 2000 songs in about 4 seconds, and still land on exactly the one you want without overshooting, with about 1 minute of practice.

    I haven't seen any interface on the Nomad that will actually let you find your songs in such a huge library.

    1. Re:Slightly larger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twice as big by volume. This is easily accomplished by slightly increasing all three dimensions. That's where the "slightly" comes from.

  48. Creative-ly shoddy support by Bronz · · Score: 5, Informative

    In December we purchased an original Nomad Jukebox (10GB for $100 after Mail-in-Rebate). Exactly 96 days after purchase, the unit failed to boot. Creative's warranty, of course, was an impressive 90 days. Thinking back to the knee-jerk reaction of declining the Best Buy extended warranty, I felt like quoting some Khan from Star Trek II.

    Anywho, I take care of my devices. The Jukebox still has the plastic covering the LCD. Ghetto, ya dig?

    I engaged in an epic duel with Creative's tech support via e-mail. Sending extremely detailed reports to them, and met in return with extremely canned responses. Most often, the responses asked questions that I had already answered in the previous mail. Obviously, this wasn't going anywhere.

    To make matters worse, it had been over the '6 to 8 week' waiting period and I still had no rebate check. Customer Service said 'sorry' and acknowledged the irony that the unit was out of warranty and broken before Creative could even be bothered to mail my rebate. And by that I mean they didn't acknowledge the irony. At all. They just didn't care.

    Instead of pursuing the matter further with Creative's customer service, I used the 'protection' feature of my credit card to reimburse me for the unit, and swore off Creative for future products.

    I don't doubt the Nomads have gotten better through the revisions. However, I try to judge a company equally between the good products they make and how they handle thier failures.

    Buyer beware.

    1. Re:Creative-ly shoddy support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Woah - that sounds about as crappy as my experience will Apple over an iPod.

    2. Re:Creative-ly shoddy support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My expreience with Apple over an iPod.

      Went to an apple store. Explained that I had trouble syncing and that I had gone there before and the advice didn't work. He went to the back room and got a brand new replacement ipod for me.

    3. Re:Creative-ly shoddy support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad I bought an Archos ;)

    4. Re:Creative-ly shoddy support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But XPlay is not even supported software. How can you complain about it when you used the wrong software?

  49. uh... hello WAV files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At 60gb we are quickly approaching the level where I can use a quality, full format like WAV over all the compressed but less robust formats like AAC, MP3, OGG, etc.

    Not only do those formats essential trick your brain into hearing sounds that aren't really there, but often they are encoded at 128kbps only (AAC) which is unacceptable for a good portion of my more refined music.

    Think about it. On a 60gb player I can carry 120 ALBUMS in pure WAV format with no loss whatsoever. And at $100 less? This one's a no brainer.

    -rt

  50. Old iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the new iPods are slimmer.

  51. They have video players. by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  52. Re:I'll go for the cheaper one this time... by dborod · · Score: 1

    Hmm. I updated [apple.com] mine just fine...

    Excuse me? iPod owners have been waiting for Apple to release software that would let you create a playlist on the iPod itself since the first iPod came out over a year ago. The good news is that version 2.0 of the software has been released (and supports this feature). The bad news is that the only way to get this software is to buy a new iPod.

  53. Only one includes: by ihatewinXP · · Score: 1

    The iTunes music store: the first real reason to buy an mp3. Oh and the attention to detail that will make you a convert..

    And if that isnt enough the new iPods come with solitare (and laser engraving)!

    Looking at my 60gb music collection (10,052 songs) I might consider the Zen, but I only kid myself when I say for mp3's (and an OSX emergency start drive) I need more than my 10gb pod.

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
    1. Re:Only one includes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're proposing that the opportunity to spend 10 grand on music in a transitory format is a *positive* selling point?

  54. Here are some stats... by AaronBaker2000 · · Score: 3, Informative
    These stats compare the 20 GB Zen with the 30 GB iPod. Compiled from here and here.

    Size
    iPod: 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.73 inches
    Zen: 3 x 4.4 x 1 inches

    Weight
    iPod: 6.2 ounces
    Zen: 9.5 ounces

    It should also be noted that the Zen can get FM radio stations with an optional remote control and can use USB 2 or Firewire. The iPod has a bigger screen, but it can only use Firewire. In addition to mp3 format, the Zen supports WMA and WAV. The iPod supports mp3 and AAC audio.

    1. Re:Here are some stats... by snitty · · Score: 1

      The iPod has a bigger screen, but it can only use Firewire.

      The new iPod (via its new bottom connector) can use either USB 2.0, or Firewire)

      --
      Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
    2. Re:Here are some stats... by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 3, Informative
      It should also be noted that the Zen can get FM radio stations with an optional remote control and can use USB 2 or Firewire. The iPod has a bigger screen, but it can only use Firewire. In addition to mp3 format, the Zen supports WMA and WAV. The iPod supports mp3 and AAC audio.

      No, the new iPods support USB2 and FireWire. In fact, the current Nomad Zen only supports USB2 or FireWire (the FireWire model only supports USB1.1; hopefully this will change with the new version). And the iPod also supports WAV (and AIFF and Audible).

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    3. Re:Here are some stats... by low-fi · · Score: 1

      The iPods can now use USB2, but cannot charge from it due to the limitations of the interface. Furthermore, you can get an FM adaptor from Griffin http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/ifm/inde x.html

      IMHO, the interface for the iPod is golden. There is nothing that, as yet, beats it. If you have 30GB of audio, how long would it take to get from the top of the list to the bottom on the Zen? As a previous poster indicated, it would be about 4 seconds on an iPod.

    4. Re:Here are some stats... by inajar · · Score: 1

      Hate to rain on your parade, but the new iPods that just came out can use Firewire, USB 2 or USB 1. Sure you have to buy an adapter to use USB, but it's a lot better than having to buy a completely different model to get that functionality like I would have to do if I wanted to use Firewire with the Nomad Zen. Isn't $20 for a different cable a much better deal than $400 for a different MP3 player? Also, the iPod is compatible with both Macs and Windows out of the box. From what I can tell the Nomad Zen isn't, and I haven't seen any indication that it will be. And speaking of optional remote controls that enable FM tuning, you might want to look at the iFM from Griffin Technology. It allows you to turn your older iPod into an FM tuner. Sure it's only for the older models right now, but I've been informed that there will be an updated version that works with the new iPods shortly. Oh, and in addition to MP3 and AAC the iPod also supports WAV, AIFF, and Audible (books-on-tape). But I don't see why how many file formats a device supports is really important. I mean, do you really have any of your music encoded as WAV or WMA?

    5. Re:Here are some stats... by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      Theres actually 2 fm devices from griffin, the tuner and the tranmitter. Either is $35. The wired remote with tuner is optional for the Zen at $70.

  55. Why I am buying an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The number one reason I am buying an Ipod is because it will have the best support for my Mac. I see Nomad finally supports OS X (must be within the last week or two), but I'm not going to trust something that new.

    The second reason is because it offers some PDA style functionality such as a calendar, alarm, contacts and notes (hopefully notes will let us read full length books similar to palm books).

    3rd, rumor mill has it that there is a recording capability which would be really cool.(http://www.ipoding.com/modules.php?op=modloa d&name=News&file=article&sid=1135&mode=thread&orde r=1)

    4th, MPEG4/AAC instead of mp3.

    And finally, because I really need a $500 Solitare/Brix game. And not to mention, it looks much nicer (IMO) than the Nomad.

    1. Re:Why I am buying an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus parachute!

  56. where is the pluggable codec support ? by neotokyo · · Score: 1

    I dont want to spend time re-encoding my [insert favorite digital file type 1] files to [insert favorite digital file type 2].

    Modern software-based digital music players (xmms, winamp, freeamp, etc.) use pluggable codecs to support a large range of music files. Where is the hardware-based digital player that follows suit ? Obviously its not easy/cheap to do, but thats where my money will go. I should be able to add support for new codecs as they arrive. How about codecs on a flash/SD card ?

    1. Re:where is the pluggable codec support ? by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      damn straight

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    2. Re:where is the pluggable codec support ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The decoders these handhelds use are not general purpose enough for that. It'll be some time before there is a handheld chip small, fast and efficient enough to do this.

    3. Re:where is the pluggable codec support ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you understand how codec's work? In small digital devices like this they have a dedicated chip (think processor) that crunches the numbers to convert the digital data into analog audio. A computer with a software codec handles that process by essentially emulating that processor. There is a _ton_ more overhead than a dedicated embedded processor. Hence why you can't decode MP3s or whatever format on a slow machine. In order to put enough of a processor into a portable device to support software codecs you would end up with a device that weighs many times more, has miserable battery life, and costs much much much more. All the posts above yours list those three complaints already on the Zen.

      If any company were to suggest such a device, I can guarantee the 2nd post on slashdot would be "why do I need this huge/heavy/expensive device when I can build a portable computer for less?"

      This is why you will never see OGG support in a cheap MP3 player. All those devices are doing is reading data off some kind of storage device and pumping it into the (cheap, small, power-efficient) dedicated mp3 processor and taking the output to some kind of speaker or line-out device.

      Now, there are chip companies making embedded processors that do OGG and maybe even MP3 as well. They will cost more because of the low volume, and will be larger and suck more juice than a comparable just-mp3 chip... but maybe the market will bear that eventually.

      Next.... FPGAs are interesting. I'm not nearly smart enough to know how feasable something like what you're asking for is... but it's certainly a more efficient way of going about things. However, they still have the size/efficiency/cost issues, although to a much lesser extent. The cost then is shifted to development. Something that the embedded chip makers make up for in the volume of selling billions of low cost dedicated chips.

      Make sense?

      --Darren

  57. Creative products are worth shit by linuxguy · · Score: 1

    I have used a Nomad Jukebox as well as Apple iPod. And I can say that Creative Nomad Jukebox is a piece of shit when compared to iPod. I should know I own one. It has been collecting dust in my garage for the past several months. Large, ugly, slow, clunky, battery sucker and really really bad interface. It is a pain to use. I went ahead and bough a $40 Samsung CD player from Costco that plays MP3s. I use it a lot more. I also recently bought Creative speakers and Extigy, the external USB sound card. Both crap. I am not buying another creative product even again.

  58. Interesting product... by switcha · · Score: 1
    ...but I'd be interested to see who here is really gonna shop these two around?

    I'm going to go ahead and be honest and say I would never consider the Nomad as I am a terribly, sold out Apple slut. I'm not going to make leet arguments about it...it's cool, and if I buy a MP3 player, it will be an iPod. Simple as that.

    And judging from about 40 of the 90-something posts here so far, until something supports Ogg it will get summarily smacked down and shit-talked until the Penguins come home.

    If you are a first-time MP3 player buyer and are seriously weighing these two on /. ...do you even exist?

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  59. You think so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I'll stick with my good old price + performance + features + aesthetics way of deciding on technology. If you do a value analysis on both products the Zen described in this article it wins, hands down.

    Besides, I'm not so insecure or superficial that I need an iPod from Apple to serve as a badge of my artistic individuality. Kudos to you though!

    -rt

  60. sigh, so painfully true by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Creative has to be right up there with Microsoft in terms of their consistant and blatant contempt for their own customers.

    It's been over two years since Creative bought out Aureal, and they still have neither released a card that supports Aureal's A3D 2.0 standard (still lightyears ahead of any version of EAX), nor open-sourced the drivers for the old Aureal cards.

    I can't think of a single hardware company I'd be less likely to give my money to. (What, me bitter about my old Diamond MX300? Why yes.)

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:sigh, so painfully true by arakon · · Score: 1

      Well since we're bashing Creative, how about listing some alternative sound cards. Cause even if they do suck by your standards, I'd like to know of other cards that are comparable in price and features.

      I've been personally looking at getting a Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Platinum. But if you are privy to facts that I am unaware of please share rather than leaving just vague accusations.

      Not that I'm saying crappy tech support is alright, but lately no matter what company you deal with of late the tech support is crap. That or you end up speaking to some guy who barely speaks english in India... but I'm getting side-tracked into a nother issue.

      --
      "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
    2. Re:sigh, so painfully true by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Well, it all depends on what you're doing with them. If you're going to be playing games, there's nothign wrong with an Audigy (or a used Live!) -- nobody's coding for A3D any more, and it's what all the game companies support.

      If I were building a system from scratch right now, I'd just get an nForce2 motherboard: nVidia's builtin sound is easily equal to the Audigy.

      If I had to buy a PCI card, I'd probably look at the current offerings from Guillemot/Hercules or Turtle Beach cards that use the Crystal CS4630 from Cirrus Logic.

      If I had to do real professional sound work...I'd ask someone who knew. :)

      --

      News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    3. Re:sigh, so painfully true by cortana · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Anyone with a "lesser" sound card like the SB 64 or 128 will remember the debacle of lies and deceit that surrounded the development of WDM drivers for the cards (necessary for use with Windows 2000). And anyone remember what happened to Ensoniq?

      To the point of my post: I find myself about to buy a cheap SB Live 5.1, purely because it supports hardware mixing _damn well_ in Linux. I know that other cards exist, but finding them for a good price (the Live is £25) in the UK is another matter.

      Can anyone save me from selling my soul to the devil, again? :)

    4. Re:sigh, so painfully true by arakon · · Score: 1

      Well actually I'm looking for something to hook my Midi keyboard up and offer a decent range of abilities besides mixing/recording. (at the sub $300 price point)

      But I'll keep those suggestions in mind for my wife's game box.

      --
      "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
    5. Re:sigh, so painfully true by andrewski · · Score: 1

      The truly fucked thing about Creative is that they now want to charge you for substantial updates.

      The undelivered promises about upgrading the EMU 10K piss me off too. If only they would document this now realitively old card some incredible things could be done with it. Think of the Creamware Pulsar - the Live! easily has enough balls to do the same stuff. Not to mention what the Audigy could do with half-decent drivers and some access to docs.

    6. Re:sigh, so painfully true by moebius_4d · · Score: 1

      Get an echo mia. Two words: balanced outputs. If you must have surround out then m-audio have something nice too, unbalanced out but far superior audio to creative.

    7. Re:sigh, so painfully true by moebius_4d · · Score: 1

      OK, now that I've seen this child post...

      I got an m-audio omni studio for $275 on ebay. I did have to hunt for some time to do that well, but you can easily snap one up for $325. Once again, balanced outs, plus a good bunch of ins and outs, soft mixer with zero latency monitoring, terrific ASIO drivers, and some acceptable mic pres. I have a standalone pre so I didn't really care. You might not either unless you're recording something really nice through a nice mic. (I use the studio projects c1 condensor for vocals, and I can tell a difference. With this AKG D880S dynamic it's pretty much the same.)

      Another choice would be to get a real mixer and the delta 1010 or layla24, but that will leave your price target range. The omni studio acts sort of like a mixer so it's a good choice for those who don't have one.

      Oh, the omni doesn't do midi. I use the m-audio uno usb for that. It's worlds better than the midi in on my motherboard, and the little signal lights help debug midi connections.

    8. Re:sigh, so painfully true by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was reminded recently as I waited in line for two hours to download drivers from their website for the third time (Unexplicable disconnection from their site during the first two tries) never to purchase another Creative product again. Nobody else makes you wait until there's only 5-10 other people downloading... Can't they spring for some decent hosting? Perhaps they should try to reduce the size (30MB!?) of their driver files if they cant afford the bandwidth. Six hours is a long time to wait for a single driver when you've got a 1.5Mbit connection.

      If only they'd just stop buying companies that make cool stuff and turing it to shit...

  61. Check out this software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any who owns a Nomad player or is thinking about getting one has to check out this software called Notmad Explorer.

    http://www.redchairsoftware.com/notmad/

    I don't think any other MP3 player has software this cool for it.

  62. iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did anyone thing about the software they use? iTunes is a REALLY nice app and that counts for a lot.

  63. Bitch, bitch, bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPod almost gets it but no FM tuner.

    /me wonders why the FUCK anyone would want an FM tuner when they can carry 7500 songs around in their pocket. Sometimes you get tired of just the music that YOU like and want to sample whatever vapid claptrap ClearChannel is shitting out onto the airwaves? Do you miss having to listen to a shitload of annoying commercials in a row?

    /me sighs. Fine. Here. $35.

  64. Mac support by shimmerkid · · Score: 1

    One big question is "does the Zen support the Mac?" If not, then I'm bummed.

  65. Archos AV320 by meehawl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Audio-only players are so 90s. Personally, I'm saving my money for the Archos AV320, or something like it. Big screen, MP3 *&* MPEG video playback and record. The lack of wireless, though, is a sore point.

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.04/play.html ?pg=12

    http://shanebrinkmandavis.com/homepage/JBMM/Prerel easePicts/

    --

    Da Blog
  66. The 20 GB Zen is great! by cleveland61 · · Score: 1

    I have had the 20 GB for about a month (Doh! 40 more gigs!) And I have loved every minute. As usual, I skipped the headphones that came with it and use a good, studio pair. This play has, hands down, the best sound of any portable mp3 player that I have ever plugged this pair of headphones into. Simply great.

    Secondly, I like it's complete lack of DRM. I can transfer my music between my computers in different parts of the world no problem. And data files too! Unfortunately, this is also one of the major flaws as well. You need Creative's drivers/ software to do this. No problem if you are going back and forth between said computer fairly often, but for a one time shot it is a little bit of a drawback.

    There is a util to make a windows floppy for data xfers, but not mp3 sync or xfer.

    The controls are fine for me, but to each his own. I've always found that no matter how obscure the lay out, your hands learns it soon enough.

    For price, features, capacity and quality I don't think you can beat this.

  67. Stylin'! by jdoff · · Score: 1

    60 GB capaciy and cool and all, but what really makes it sweet is that it's got the classic styling of a 1997 Western Digital hard drive. Beauty.

  68. 2 points. by seven5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Point 1:

    The Nomad might have something going as far as storage goes. But it doesn't navigate nearly or integrate nearly as nice as an iPod. Of course if you are talking iPod on windows vs Nomad on windows then it might be a different story. But NOTHING is nicer than a syncing iPod on a mac with iTunes. Whether i am at my comptuer or on the go, or in my car, my tracks are being incremented and i can rate them on the road and then just sync that when i get home, and use all of that data in a smart dynamic playlist. Its very very nice.

    Point 2:
    I don't think i would give $10 much less $400 to Creative. They have the worst support known to man for their products. They took 1 1/2 years just to release drivers for their SBLive cards on win 2k. And I'm sure everyone else here is familiar with their support of their own products.

    They kind of just PUT stuff out in the public domain and then just let it sit.

    1. Re:2 points. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new Windows iPod syncs to Mac iTunes just fine. A friend of mine and I exprimented with his 30GB iPod (Windows) on my Mac. You just can't go the other way around (Mac iPod on Windows PC) without some kind of third party software, though.

  69. RIAA is on the way... by sxltrex · · Score: 1

    I've strongly considered buying a hard drive player, but I'm slightly worried about failure. It'd be nice to move my mp3 collection over to a 60gig player and free up some space, but what if the player gets fried? I suppose I could burn backups to CD too, and I suppose I should anyway, but regardless harddrives are very potentially faulty things.

    Are you implying that you don't have the original CDs for all of your music? I'd be on the lookout for guys in black trench coats & sunglasses if I were you...

  70. iFM -- FM tuner for the iPod by Kaimelar · · Score: 2, Insightful
    IPod almost gets it but no FM tuner.

    I've been lusting after an iPod for a while now, but one of my reservations was a lack of an FM tuner. However, it seems that may be solved with the iFM. Griffin products have been favorably reviewed at iPod Web sites, so with luck the iFM will be of good quality.

  71. Archos Supports Macs by meehawl · · Score: 3, Informative
    One big question is "does the Zen support the Mac?" If not, then I'm bummed.
    That was why I ended up getting the Archos over the Zen as an xmas pressie for my gf - Mac Support. The Archos is visible on all platforms as a bog-standard USB2/1 external hard drive, so you can drag and drop any file at will. As I recall, the old Zen had no Mac support.
    --

    Da Blog
  72. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NPR doesn't have commercials!

    If you aren't listening to NPR, I don't know what these "better radio shows" could possibly be.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neal Boortz, G. Gordon Liddy, and the Godfather. Because I'm an American, goddamnit.

    2. Re:huh? by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Try a USB ethernet dongle

      We did. No one makes a USB ethernet dongle for apple computers.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  73. files as well by lpret · · Score: 1

    We're not talking just music, but being able to store data. I use my Jukebox3 as a portable hard drive between work and home -- much cheaper than some other solutions.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  74. iPod and Nomad both pale compared to Archos by GarthSweet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sure you can throw away your money on either of these 2 gadgets. Or you can check out the Archo's jukebox multimedia 20.

    - 20gb (40gb coming)
    - 8 hr battery life
    - DivX video playback to Tv or screen
    - built in 1.5in lcd screen (in color natch)
    - Awesome sound controls
    - USB 2.0 and Firewire (natch)
    - Optional SmartMedia and Compact Flash readers
    - Optional 1.2 mega pixel still and video camera
    - MP3 recording via built-in mic or external
    - Video recording module
    - Remote Control
    - ALL of these items (including optionals) come in cheaper then an iPod!!

    P.S. I used mine daily for the last 6 months and it's incredible! Someone once asked me if it was solidly built. I threw it over my shoulder to demonstrate bounced it off my floor picked it up and it hadn't missed a beat!

    Now the cons to be fair:
    - The battery isn't easily changed
    - The playlist support does NOT match the iPods
    - The camera attachment needs a flash
    - Video recording module has mixed reviews

    Oh and it does NOT play Ogg/Vorbis. But would you people please get over it! Nothing portable plays my .RAM, .AU, or .MIDI files either let alone my 8-tracks, but do I rank about it at the top of my lungs trying to drown out everyone else enjoying their paltry MP3's.... Nooooo.

    1. Re:iPod and Nomad both pale compared to Archos by gleam · · Score: 1

      I have one of the first-gen Archos Jukebox 6000s, and I love it too. They're pretty cheap now as well. They're not nearly as sexy or small as an ipod, but to my mind they're quite a bit nicer.

      A side note: there is an open-source firmware available for the Archos jukeboxes/studios/recorders called "Rockbox". It's very good, very usable, and VERY fast. It does not currently support the multimedia jukebox.

      If I remember correctly some newer archos's are being shipped with rockbox preinstalled now, but that might have been something I imagined. If they aren't shipping it, they should.

      http://rockbox.haxx.se

      My one big beef with the multimedia jukebox from archos is the forced scaling to properly playback divx. That is, if you want to play a divx on your archos, it needs to be a certain version of divx and a certain resolution. I'd much rather it support any resolution and any mpeg4-based codec. Oh well.

      -gleam

      --
      this .sig is not a .sig.
    2. Re:iPod and Nomad both pale compared to Archos by scottgfx · · Score: 1

      I've had my 10GB iPod for about 9 months and I've been very happy with it. That is not to say that a different player/portable HD would not be a good choice for someone. There is just a certain "coolness" factor with the iPod. That not gloating, I just enjoy holding the thing. It is a piece of art.

      I also understand the frustration of some. I used to be a serious Amiga freek. I have tens of thousands of dollars of Amiga hardware that in it's day was not respected by others. Perhaps someone has a good review on the net of the different players?

      --
      It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
    3. Re:iPod and Nomad both pale compared to Archos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to buy a mp3 player, purpose of my purchase is when I go to my music class, I would like to record my lesson for practice later on at home. so which one do you suggest. I am confuse and I have no knowledge about mp3 player. Tape recorder has very very poor sound quality and hissing sound bother me a lot. will you please advise me which one to buy? I preffered to have a microphone and bigger hard disk.

      Thank you in advance.

  75. Why you want huge disks by scout.finch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen a few posts asking Why God Why would you possibly want/need that much disk space. Surely 5GB is more than enough you Gluttonous Babboon.

    Here's why: Imagine you have 40 GB of tunes (not that many once you rip them at good quality, and you finish doing all your cd's). Now imagine you have a 20 GB player. It's all well and fun to carry half your tunes around, but you find yourself saying 'what about CD X'? No problem, just put it on the player. But first you need to remove another CD. And once you have thousands of tracks, and start getting sick of some CD's and want to rotate in others, you realize it's a Massive Pain In The Ass. After a few gigs, the ideal is to just have all your music and skip the rigamarole. The alternative is to just never get around to listening to half your music which is the problem I was trying to avoid in buying an iPod in the first place (swapping CD's from my storage binders to my little travel binder).

    1. Re:Why you want huge disks by scout.finch · · Score: 1

      Also, if you fill your player, you can't utilize that other nifty feature - portable hard drive. Instead you have to guess how much space you might need, make sure you delete enough CD's to have that space, and then maintain that buffer everytime you add a CD. More annoying maintenance work that keeps the device from just working.

      A good analogy would be a cellphone that can only hold 20 numbers. You would pick the 20 people you call the most and put them in (because you certainly aren't going to call anywhere near 20 people in one day). If you needed to call someone else you just wait until you get home, delete a few numbers and add the other ones from your Address book. A phone that holds all your phone numbers at once? That's just geek lust pure and simple. No sane person would desire such a feature.

    2. Re:Why you want huge disks by Jack+Comics · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If you have 40 gigabytes of music, either you're the RIAA poster boy or you're on one of their "Top Ten Most Wanted" list. I just can not conceivably see anyone having 40 gigabytes worth of lossy codec music. I ripped and encoded my entire CD collection that I've accumulated over the past nine years into Musepack quality 8, and my entire collection is less than 10 gigabytes. And some people claim that Musepack/MPC files are some of the largest in file size out of the lossy codec group.

      --
      "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    3. Re:Why you want huge disks by scout.finch · · Score: 1

      I have that much music and I don't have a single illegal MP3 on my machine. I have a small handful of files downloaded from mp3.com, and the rest are from cd's (192kb MP3s). I have lots of bargain classical cd's (~$1/ea.) and scores of used cd's. I have more than an average number of cd's, but I honestly doubt I have a freakishly large collection.

      If you were paying $15 per cd, then that would start to be insane.

    4. Re:Why you want huge disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way Jose. I have tons of friends who are music lovers. I have 60GB from CD's that I posess, since I guess I don't really own anything, I just license it. I have plenty of friends with as many or more CD's than me.

      I 100% agree with the above poster who said that once you get above a few GB you might as well go all the way. I don't like the thought of choosing which half of my collection to put on my mp3 player. I'd rather have it all, or just a little.

    5. Re:Why you want huge disks by Unxmaal · · Score: 1

      Music rotation is a non-issue with the iPod.

      As the battery life lasts from 6-10 hours [depending on how many songs you skip], you cannot listen to more than 200 [3 minute, average] songs before recharging, and thus re-synching. This total amount should weigh in at about 250MB, which is a fraction of the amount of songs you can store in a 5GB iPod.

      Another way that Apple has reduced the ass-pain threshold is through the incorporation of iTunes 'Smart Playlists'. SP's perform a type of rule-based shuffle to your songs, depending on the values you've set in the playlist.

      For example, my main playlist, named "4GB of stuff not played in the last week, ranked by rating", auto-synchs up to 4GB of MP3s onto the iPod each time I recharge the device. Furthermore, as the playlist name implies, the songs are added to the list [and thus the iPod] based on when it was played last and my rating. In this way, I keep a very fresh playlist that contains a good mix of both songs I really like and songs that I might not have given a good listen. Songs have to be rated at 3 stars or more to get on the iPod. If I /might/ want to hear something, I'll rate it at least 3 stars. If it sucks I'll drop it down to 1 star. Favorite songs get 4 or 5 stars, and the 'order by rating' in the SP skews the list to hold more high-rated songs than low-rated songs.

      So far I've owned my iPod for about a year, and it's the one gadget I've bought that I use every single day.

      --
      http://unxmaal.com
    6. Re:Why you want huge disks by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      iTunes compensates wonderfully with it's smart play lists. In v4, you can make play lists that of songs least listened to.. or most for that matter.

      Kinda sucks if you never listen to music via your mac. Otherwise.. it r0x3n teh b0x3n.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    7. Re:Why you want huge disks by scout.finch · · Score: 1

      You're right in that it's a step in the right direction, but the problem is ratings don't solve the 'This is a favorite CD right now so keep it' problem because I don't want to continuously upkeep the ratings on 7000 tracks.

  76. Re:Viva la Zen - Big Deal, So What...... by The+Dobber · · Score: 1

    I've had one of my PJB-100 (www.pjbox.com) modified for a 60 gig since they were available last fall.

    This lil bugger started life as a 6 gig, getting succesively larger drives (20, 30 and 40 gig) as they became available.

    Drive change takes no more than a couple minutes, once you get the hang of it.

  77. My figuring... by sterno · · Score: 1

    My thinking on the capacity was that for the most part I don't go for long trips requiring a substantial library of music. When I do, I always bring my laptop which has more hard drive space and I can carry anything extra. Basically the price point is the important part here. 100GB would be nice, but I'd be willing to sacrifice down to 5GB to get the price down.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  78. Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by lscotte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Another option is the Archos Jukebox. The 20GB recorder model is ~$225, and you can upgrade the drive to 60GB.

    One of the best things about the Archos is the OSS Rockbox firmware at http://rockbox.haxx.se/. New features are continually being added that make the Archos a very cool device. Plus, if you aren't happy with the way it works, just hack it yourself! The Rockbox source is very well written and easy to hack. Plus it has games.

    --
    This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
    1. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 2, Funny

      I seriously considered the Archos until I found out that it won't play WMA files.

      No sale.

    2. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by lscotte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh yeah, and the Archos works perfectly with the usb-storage driver in Linux.

      The great thing about using usb-storage is that the Archos looks just like a hard drive to your system. And with USB2.0, transfer performance is decent.

      --
      This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
    3. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by ibbey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed, Archos + Rockbox kicks ass. This is truly one of the best examples of open source I've seen yet. The feature set of Rockbox blows away the standard Archos, and new features are being added all the time. My favorite new feature will automatically pause the playback when you turn off the ignition in your car (when hooked up to the car cigarette lighter).

      Other cool features of the Archos: MP3 recording, FM tuning & recording (on the FM recorder models, not currently supported in rockbox), built-in batteries are rechargable AA's, so a spare set is easy & cheap (except the FM model).

      One caveat... Be sure to get either the Recorder or FM recorder model, not the Player or Multimedia. The player is supported by Rockbox, but due to hardware limitations & a bad interface, isn't a good choice. The Multimedia is not supported by Rockbox, and likely never will be. Who really wants to watch movies on a postage stamp size screen anyway.

    4. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The multimedia jukebox screen, whilst small, is exceptionally clear and watchable- plus it has a TV out.

    5. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      I seriously considered the Archos until I found out that it won't play WMA files.

      This is a joke, right? If I had mod points I would certainly give you a +1 Funny.

    6. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by Zeal17 · · Score: 1

      The iPod looks just like a firewire HD, the mp3s are stored in a hidden directory. Came in handy when I had to use the iPod as a backup to my main collection of mp3s, just went to the command line and copied everything back over.

      --

      "If it sucks without butter, it still sucks with butter, only creamier." - AC
    7. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by pigeon · · Score: 1

      My brother had an archos, (I think it was one of the older ones) with a 20 G harddisk, but compared to a ipod it was ugly, big, heavy, slow in transver (usb 1.1) an bad in soundquality. Especially the lack in sound quality was unacceptable so he got rid of it. My ipod on the other hand looks great, sounds great, is fast in transfer, is elegant, but it is a lot more expensive for it's storage. And of course, I'm sure the archos has improved.

    8. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by UrGeek · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU! I hate this binary thinking, that there are only two choices. I am a very satistied Archos customer and enjoying the freedom of putting any damn file that I want on my little battery powered USB minidisk. You will never have this freedom from Creative Labs or Apple!

    9. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by barryf · · Score: 1

      I too am a very satisfied Archos/Rockbox user.

      The lack of any need for hokey PC-side software and data storage offered by it being a USB HD means it is much more versatile for me than the Zen (which my son has, and he curses the software constantly).

      Hey, I was even able to do a full Mandrake install direct from the .iso files which I carry on my Archos!

      -Barry

    10. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as others have noted, while the big and ugly are both true - all the recent Archos have USB 2 which is just as fast in real life as Firewire. It shows up as a hard drive on any computer - no software needed. Mine sounds just as good as the iPods I have heard. Your brother's problem was probably because he was playing downloaded mp3s from napster that were recorded at 128 - those sound like suck. Oh, and did I mention that I got my 20MB Archos new for 200 bucks, half the price of a similar iPod.

    11. Re:Or get an Archos + OSS Rockbox! by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Do they have a firewire or USB 2 version? USB 1 is pretty damn slow file transfer. I like the ability to transfer any file I want though.

  79. Bluto vs Popeye by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

    That's about what it shapes up to.
    The bigger is better paradigm vs the pipsqueak with features galore.

    But I want to hold out till iPod v4 to see if they get wireless sharing. Maybe they will, may they wont, but Apple seems to be all about it's wireless networking, and being able to network ipods and other apple products on a wireless node would be uber-cool and possibly a new way to interact.

    Future scenario: Sitting on the BART doing the commute, scanning wireless networks and getting a list of users online... "ahhh, qtCh1k" *click* listen to her playlist and send a message over an embedded version of ichat.

    Far fetched? Nahhh.. just a matter of time.
    I mean, I'm already doing that with my G4 laptop, the cafe I go to in SF has a large population of other OS X users and they even provide a free wireless service and with iTunes4, we can now stream our music libraries and chat with rendezvous via the LAN.

  80. iPod does have USB2 by hoytt · · Score: 1

    The iPod has a bigger screen, but it can only use Firewire.

    The latest iPods (10, 15 and 30 GB models) offer both FireWire and USB 2.0. Just hook the iPod to your PC's USB 2.0 ports for speedy transfers.

  81. recording? by thesatirist · · Score: 1

    Are you sure you can record with the iPod? I've never seen anything about that, but it'd be great...

    1. Re:recording? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yep, it was mentioned a few days on various mac sites.

      E.g. www.ipoding.com

      It only seems to be on the most recent revision of iPod released.

    2. Re:recording? by pi+radians · · Score: 1

      Don't come here much?

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    3. Re:recording? by flufffy · · Score: 1

      Tell ya what though if it functions as an indexable voice recorder, it then becomes a legitimate business expense for many people (hee hee).

  82. Red Chair Software by lpret · · Score: 1

    Go to Red Chair Software, try the trial, buy Notmad for 25 bucks and be amazed. This is what Creative should have built -- it is much more stable, fast, and not as bloated. When you do get it, start playing around with Notweb Explorer, and you'll be amazed what your little mp3 player can do.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  83. Archos by havoc · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Archos is the way to go. I've been using mine now for almost a year. The more storage the better as it can be used for general file storage and dumping movies and pictures from digital cameras. The latest one supports video out and mpeg playback and is still cheaper than the latest iPod!

    I find it very useful to transfer files to and from work along with my entire music collection.

    I couldn't give a rats a@@ about any DRM laden formats such as Apple's new one.

    1. Re:Archos by Thargok · · Score: 1

      AAC is not Apple's, it is called MPEG-4 Standard.

      On top of that the Archos is so, so ugly. And slow. It takes like 15 sec. to open a video clip; sometimes longer for audio.

      I have a friend who has one...and well he bought the camera...sucked, tried to buy the A/V out, and no body carries it. The Archos is garbage (yellow text?!).

      I still have people staring at my 5 gig iPod that is a years old. Their jaws drop when they see how smooth it is and how easily I can navigate and open files.

    2. Re:Archos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what you've been using, but in archos defense, I have had mine for a little over 6 months now, and aside from my hasty first use (which messed up my battery) I have no issues with it other than the finish on the back coming off over time. looks cooler now that I got rid of the paint anyways. video files do not take anywhere near 15 seconds to open, and audio files play instantly. if you have a larger than life playlist it takes a few seconds to process, but other than that I think you are exaggerating quite heavily. I haven't tried the A/V unit yet so I have nothing to report there, and the camera is about the same quality as an average webcam (flash would be grand). finally, I dropped it a few weeks ago accidentally on a cement floor and it still works like a charm.

    3. Re:Archos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well damn, that is definitely the most important feature I would look for in an mp3 player. Looks.
      Forget all that other other stuff.

      I have the new FM recorder from Archos.. dunno about your friend's, but mine beats my coworker's brand new iPod 15G in song loading time - less than a second. To be fair, the iPod is indeed beatiful, but honestly, I just don't care what people think about my "style". The Archos is more functional than the iPod or the Zen, period. It's your choice I guess.

    4. Re:Archos by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      The Archos is the way to go.

      After a lot of research, I recently both the Archos Recorder 20, and I love it. The software in ROM isn't so great, but that's OK, as there is Rockbox, an open-source project that has very good software that is getting better all the time. When you plug it into your computer, it's just a USB hard drive, so you can manage your music with whatever you want (I just use rsync to sync from my main box to the portable).

      The price also seemed great to me; the 20 gig model was circa $200 from Harmony. And even if I never do it, the fact that if somethings annoys me enough I can just go in and fix the code myself is a damned good feature.

  84. Made for Electronica!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what the Nomad is good for? Plenty of trance livesets and essential mixes! Pitty to those who listen to singles, no wonder you're in a complicated mess!

    Lots of livesets will take up that space!

    1. Re:Made for Electronica!!! by ghunza · · Score: 1

      That's great but how much annonymous house music can you listen to without thinking it all sounds the same? No offense but half way through that 90 minute live set, you are bound to ask yourself: "Self, have I heard this vocal sample before?" Similarly, finding that great section of a live mix is a huge pain in the ass. The granularity of the sliders doesn't seem to hold up when you are dealing with a 150meg mp3 file.

      ...but this could be just me.

  85. It can never be too large by Patik · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have a 20GB player right now and it's completely full with 192kbps MP3s of all my store-bought CDs. I hope to re-rip them at 256 or 320kbps so when I hook the player up to a stereo it sounds nice.

    Why so many songs? I got tired of carrying around a CD player and so many CDs. And even if I brought 100 CDs on a long trip, I'd always find myself in the mood for something I had left behind. No with my entire collection at hand, I always have everything I want.

    1. Re:It can never be too large by afidel · · Score: 1

      Don't bother with such high rates, use LAME with -extreme (or equivilant) VBR settings, averages about 200-220Kbps and sounds identical to the source material. Just make sure your player supports VBR and 320Kbps max rate (these are the largest frames LAME uses, iPod's are golden with this setup.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:It can never be too large by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa there cowboy - you better check with your girlfriend on that.

  86. Battery cannot be replaced. by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1

    There is a major problem with previous versions of the Zen that the rechargable battery cannot be replaced by the user or by tech support - once the battery is dead, the unit has to be replaced. I believe the iPod had a similar issue with batteries. I'm definitely in the market, but I'll make my purchase decision based on resolution of this critical issue.

  87. This gives pudge something else to buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since he plans to cancel his ipod purchase on rumor that it makes a 'pop' between tracks, maybe. Maybe he can buy this and leave people alone.

  88. What I want to know is... by elite+lamer · · Score: 1

    ...how much RAM does the Nomad Zen have? The iPod has 32MB of RAM, which is a very good amount. You need a big chunk of RAM with something like this to prevent messing up the hard drive while you're walking, jogging, etc.

    --
    Oops!
  89. What i really want... by Recoil_42 · · Score: 1

    ..is just an mp3 player with a good battery life.

    i havent seen a hardrive based mp3 player with more than 15 hours of battery life yet. what good is 4000 hours of music; when the battery only lasts for 10 hours?

    the Zen only has a 12 hour battery life; the Ipod only 10. what kind of crap is this? the reason i bought the CD player i did is because it had a 35 hour battery life.

    i just dont want to have to charge the damn thing *every single day*

    first, that destroys overall battery life. second, its a pain to do!

    does anyone know of a HD-based player with a 20+ hour battery life? i'd really go for that; much moreso than having 60gb.

    --


    Newsie, Moderator, www.tauniverse.com
  90. They will... by sterno · · Score: 1

    Tis the beauty of the computer/consumer electronics industry. Moore's law and it's various counterparts insure that capacity will go up, prices will go down, etc. It ought to get quite interesting when these things really get to be comoditized. Soon these things will cost $100, have all the capacity you could reasonably want, and sound good as well.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  91. Apple DRM Support by RobRancho · · Score: 1

    Still, what use would one have for the increased capacity without the ability to "authorize" a Zen for playback of my AAC files bought from the Apple music store? If creative announces support for AAC with Fairplay (Apple's DRM technology) and Apple supports the Zen in iTunes, then the Zen is the big winner tonight!

  92. Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by FosterKanig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Drag and drop? I've gotten spoiled by just plugging my iPod in, waiting 30 seconds while it automatically updates everything, and then unplugging
    For data files, yeah, I guess I have to do the drag and drop. But for music, I'll stick to "plug and un-plug"

    While I prefer the iPod, I enjoy the competition because it only make both products better in the long run. And that benefits me, and isn't that what it is all about?

    1. Re:Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by giberti · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just picked up a 15GB iPod (slightly smaller than the 30Gb) and am enjoying the intergration with iTunes as well as the new Apple Music service, my only gripe is that if you're storing your music on a network drive it can take a little while to get things sync'd the first time.

      <rant>The iTunes 4 app doesn't mutitask as well as prior versions did either (at least on a dual proc machine) and there's a big red flag in the success of the Apple product... Its an Apple only software/hardware package. Sure the iPod runs on PC's with MusicMatch, but does the music service. This alone could be the death of the music service. I hope Apple is ready to release some sort of patch/plugin for Windows based systems.</rant>

      Another hitch of the new iPod is the connector for the dock on the bottom. Not only does all old iPod car chargers etc not work, but it requires wires coming out of both ends to plug into your car stereo! What happened to everything out of one end. Other than that Kudos to the designers, everything was simple to get out of the box (nice design in and of itself), set up and get running.

      --

      AF-Design, web development.
    2. Re:Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by frinkster · · Score: 1
      I enjoy the competition because it only make both products better in the long run. And that benefits me, and isn't that what it is all about?


      Insert Microsoft joke here.
    3. Re:Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by Zeal17 · · Score: 1

      The iTunes 4 app doesn't mutitask as well as prior versions did either (at least on a dual proc machine) and there's a big red flag in the success of the Apple product... Its an Apple only software/hardware package. Sure the iPod runs on PC's with MusicMatch, but does the music service. This alone could be the death of the music service. I hope Apple is ready to release some sort of patch/plugin for Windows based systems.

      There are rumors of a windows version of iTunes in the work.

      --

      "If it sucks without butter, it still sucks with butter, only creamier." - AC
    4. Re:Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by gig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple's Music Service is also AOL's new music service. AOL is owned by one of the big 5 record companies that are part of the Apple Music service.

      A Wal-Mart subset of the iTunes Music Store will be in the next AOL client.

      Please don't say "death" and "Apple" in the same sentence unless it is something that actually has happened and is a fact. I mean, we've heard it all before.

      Also, the service is already successful. They sold more songs in the first day than all the other paid download services ever built COMBINED. That was just halfway through the first day, actually. And the new 3rd generation iPod sold 250,000 pre-orders in the four days between announcement and release date.

      The numbers on Apple's stuff here are music business size numbers, not dot-com size numbers like all the other stuff out there.

    5. Re:Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by g4dget · · Score: 3, Informative
      Drag and drop? I've gotten spoiled by just plugging my iPod in, waiting 30 seconds while it automatically updates everything, and then unplugging

      That's not exactly rocket science or a complex programming effort. Rather, it's a five line USB hotplug script on Linux (using rsync) that works with every player: iPod, Zen, whatever.

    6. Re:Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by edxwelch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Playcenter has this feature as well, it's called "auto sync", but it is rather simplified. If you delete a file on your Jukebox it doesn't delete the corrasponding one on the PC. Neither does it update when you change a MP3 tag.

    7. Re:Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by mbbac · · Score: 1

      I don't think his point had anything to do with how difficult it was to implement. I think his point was that iTunes is the only one to implement it well.

      --

      mbbac

    8. Re:Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's not exactly rocket science or a complex programming effort. Rather, it's a five line USB hotplug script on Linux (using rsync) that works with every player: iPod, Zen, whatever.

      For 98% of the population a "five line USB hotplug script" is rocket science and a complex programming effort.

      "Normal" users should even need to think about this sort of stuff.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    9. Re:Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by derch · · Score: 1

      The iTunes 4 app doesn't mutitask as well as prior versions did either (at least on a dual proc machine) and there's a big red flag in the success of the Apple product... Its an Apple only software/hardware package. Sure the iPod runs on PC's with MusicMatch, but does the music service. This alone could be the death of the music service. I hope Apple is ready to release some sort of patch/plugin for Windows based systems.

      Stories on the Windows port of iTunes: apple.slashdot.org & MacSlash

      It will include the Music Store and probably iPod support (hasn't been confirmed but it's one of those d'uh things to do). At the iTMS/iPod show, Jobs announced that the Music Service would be on Windows by the end of the year.

    10. Re:Drag and drop, shmrag and pop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Another hitch of the new iPod is the connector for the dock on the bottom. Not only does all old iPod car chargers etc not work, but it requires wires coming out of both ends to plug into your car stereo!
      I doubt it, as the dock has a line out socket. I bet that the multitude of pins on the dock connector cover not just power, Firewire and USB2, but also line in, line out, and remote functions; it may even be possible to send track data over the connector.

      This would mean not only could you connect your iPod to a connector in the car and get power and audio, but you could even control it from the headset and even get track names displayed!

      Of course, you'd have to have something on the headset that supported this, but I'm sure that the functions for controlling multi-CD changers could be used; they must send and recieve similar data.
  93. It's a troll but... by sterno · · Score: 1

    Did you read that. It's for listening to NPR, the only remaining home of decent radio.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:It's a troll but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CBC makes NPR look like high school amateurs. www.cbc.ca

  94. ARRRRGH Ensoniq by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 1

    God, I'd managed to completely forget that I'm a two-time loser via Creative Labs' mergers&acquisitions department. First my Ensoniq 1370, then my Aureal.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  95. Zen sucks if you use Linux... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 4, Informative

    The file transfer protocol is proprietary and has only been partially reverse engineered. See libnjb.sourceforge.net for details. The Linux tools for getting songs onto the device currently suck goat nuts.

    The iPod on the other hand, appears as a mass storage device (generic SCSI hard drive on top of Firewire). You can easily "mount" the iPod and use "cp" to copy files to it. This is very different from the Zen, which appears as a random USB device and requires special programs and scripts to put data onto it.

    I bought a Nomad Zen 20GB USB 2.0 for $212 and I think it was a waste of money. I'll probably give it to someone who uses Windows and buy an iPod.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:Zen sucks if you use Linux... by afidel · · Score: 1

      You can cp files all day long but it won't get you playback on the iPod, to do that you need to update the database. Of course the DB format for the iPod has been known since just months after initial launch so its not that big a deal, but you do need an app that groks the iPods DB format to update it.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Zen sucks if you use Linux... by damian · · Score: 1

      The iPod might be easy to mount, but the format of the database which is used to index the music files on the iPod is not documented either and had to be reverse engineered.

      I am using the gnupod tools at the moment, which are far from perfect. I also tried gtkpod which was even worse.

  96. Another use - Linux! by mrklin · · Score: 1
    I am fine with Windows and OS X but a number of SlashDot audience will probably like this capability. Linux on iPod.

    FAQ located here.

  97. not too ravenous really by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

    ;-)

    simon

  98. zen is a better choice by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

    from my personal exp between the new ipod and the zen (tried the new one out for the first time on saturday) the zen is still king of sound quality. i tested it using 3 different high end headphones (Beyerdynamic DT250-250s, Senn 480s and 280pros). bass impact on the zen is much better (that can be told esp on the beyerdynamics as they squeeze every ounce of bass out of what you plug them into, and thats true for any headphones they make), the overall clearness from the zen was much better then the ipods. its like that sound you get going from a SBLive! to an audigy 2. you suddenly hear more things that you didnt even notice were there on the Live. the ui. i agree that the ipod ui is easier to learn but once you get into the zen its easier to find what your looking for then it is on the ipod in my opinion. that search function the zen has really comes in handy zen has 100mW output and 98db. the ipod has a 60mW output and wont even list its db. so that means that you'll need an amp if you want some high end headphones like the DT250-250s or the senn 480s but the zen has a high enough output that you dont need that amp. battery life. zen has a rated 14hrs (i pull the rated 12 and an extra 30mins on my firewire model fyi) and ipod has a rated 8. zen is the clear winner there usb2.0, the zen has it now while it lost the firewire (appears to be discontinued). the ipod wont have it until june and wants you to pay another $20 for the cable. yes playcenter sucks but you can also use windows media player to transfer music. creative file manager isnt that bad. i havent had it crash on me in the middle of a file transfer like playcenter did once. but all in all notmad is still better hands down. durability. well i dropped my zen down the wooden stairs of my house while fidgeting with the belt clip on the case and it didnt even skip when i picked it up. i doubt the ipod would of been so lucky. and finally AAC support....the only reason apple is even using that is because in their agreement with the labels thats what they finally agreed on. that'd be like if Creative suddenly came out and said they made AAC-Plus or something. theres even downsides to the ipod. some people have been noticing an audible "click" between tracks on their new iPods. See thread linked below. I would wait to see whether Apple resolves this problem in a firmware update before I buy. http://www4.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&t hreadid=33481 something else i found in that thread on head-fi "Also, one major drawback with current firmware is the queuing. If you're currently listening to the 'on the go' playlist, and then add a song to it, that newly added song wont be played on the curently listened playlist. You have to restart the playlist for the added song to be recognized on the list." looks like they managed to screw up that feature too, haha. that significantly brings down the appeal of the new Ipod to me. although that's probably something they could fix with firmware upgrade maybe? the only thing ipod has over the zen is its weight and size along with its little games and calendar.

    1. Re:zen is a better choice by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      i also forgot to note creative will sell replacement batteries starting sometime this year. so those of you with any battery problems what so ever will be able to open up the zen and replace it.

    2. Re:zen is a better choice by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      also dont forget that creative will be releasing its new player sometime in november-early december (creative just says "in time for christmas"). it'll be using Microsofts Media2Go which will allow the next zen to offer video playback, image viewing, music playback, etc etc. it'll have 12hr battery life with 8 rated for video playback and have at least 20gigs of storage. so i think this is kind of the hold over so they dont lose much market share to apple. if creative can have as successful of a launch as they did with the zen with this device then they'd be in a position to take the entire market heres the Microsoft press release. creative had one somewhere and im tryin to locate that now http://search.microsoft.com/gomsuri.asp?n=2&c=rp_R esults&siteid=us&target=http://www.microsoft.com/p resspass/press/2003/mar03/03-13CreativeLabsPR.asp

  99. iFM from griffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those wanting an FM tuner with their ipod

    http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/ifm/

  100. I switched by Galvatron · · Score: 1

    This is probably because OSX is attracting a lot of the people who read /. I went from Apple to PC about 8 years ago. This year, I started thinking about switching back. Read my last comment for information on why I decided against it (basically, my girlfriend's POS iBook kept breaking and costing hundreds of dollars to fix (with Apple refusing to honor their warranty)). She would switch to a PC, except she is computer illiterate enough that she doesn't think she'd be able to handle the change.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    1. Re:I switched by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Apple always honors the warranty, you just have to be creative about it. When I dropped my iBook and broke the CD door off the side, it called complaining about a flimsy CD door that broke, no explination as to why it broke was given, nor asked for. They simply offered to replace it, and the shipping was on them. When I got it back, not only had the drive door been replaced, but the screen casing (which had an internal crack) had also been replaced. Apple always honors the waranty, as long as you aren't too forthcomming about your problems.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:I switched by stev3 · · Score: 1

      Some of us have a conscience and don't commit fraud.

    3. Re:I switched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might interest you to know that Apple laptops are made by ECS. I wouldn't touch any products made by ECS. I don't care how many features they've got. Somebody hexed that company and all their products break apart like cheap plastic toys. The only reason they don't look or behave as crappy as they could is because Apple play a large role in their design. But they're still ECS.

    4. Re:I switched by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      If they don't ask, is it fraud?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    5. Re:I switched by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Not to sound anti-Semitic here, but Steve does drive a hard bargain sometimes. My TiG4 DVI 666 had a problem with the case coming apart at the corner by the CD drive. The top kind of cave in there, and Bad Stuff happened inside (friend logic board). I sent it to Apple and they called me up one day and said they weren't going to repair it - it was a cosmetic issue. I said "No, you are going to fix it. It is under warranty, and if you don't honor the warranty, I will contact my state's Attorney General!" Of course, they capitulated. You just have to be firm with them, much like any other company. At least Apple will eventually fix their shit, though, unlike, for example, Creative.

    6. Re:I switched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      Why this issue was raised confuses me. You can always get your product fixed when it's under warranty, unless you are a moron. The companies are there to make sure you're happy so if they refuse, YOU should be the one to tell them how it is. I thought this was common knowledge. I've never had quality problems with any Apple products, but if I did I would make sure it was fixed.

      Be strong people. Or am I just a bully...

  101. creeping featurism by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Insightful
    These new MP3 players (yes, that includes iPod) have too many features. I don't care about integration with iTunes or whatever the vendor's equivalent on PC is.

    On my computer, I organize my MP3s using the file system. E.g., if I want to listen to "Dark Side of the Moon", it's in "music/rock/Pink Floyd/Dark Side of the Moon". I've got xmms open, and I keep the "add dir" window opened, which has a nice tree view, so to play an album, I simply double click on it in that window, and hit play over in the main window.

    So, for an MP3 player, I just want something that I can copy my music directory to, and then access via a simple interface.

    This is what I like about my Archos 15 gig, which was $180. It simply works the way I do...it doesn't ask me to buy into some grand unified vision of music management like the others seem to.

    1. Re:creeping featurism by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      thats exactly what the zen does. it lised based on whats in the tag of the directory you put onto it. the zen plays music and thats it. its not like the ipod with its contact list, calendar, and games. i bought the zen because i wanted music over all the other crap.

    2. Re:creeping featurism by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      But the iTunes and iPod combo simply works to. Infact, it works even better for most people, becasue they don't have to muck around copying things over when they rip a new album.

      I honeslty don't get your argument about featurism or "grand unified vision of music management" Itunes is a simple, easy to use player, that syncs with your iPod. The only difference between it at what you do is that iTunes does it automacticly.

      Question. Have you ever use iTunes and an iPod before?

      It's almost as if you're afraid of these managment systems. Which is ironic becasue that's what your filesystem is anyway.

    3. Re:creeping featurism by juuri · · Score: 1

      the ipod sorts files based on the information inside of the mp3 tags.

      with that said you can replicate structures you may have used on other mp3 players with a custom genre tag. it works.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    4. Re:creeping featurism by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 1

      I own an Archos (20g Recorder). I bought it because it seemed like the only player that had a good chance of playing OGGs (I later found out that I had badly misread the Rockbox FAQ, and that OGG support on the Archos is like the second coming). The Zen seemed only to be supported on Windows and I use Linux. The iPod didn't seem to have such an active firmware hacking community.

      Anyhoo, I like the fact that I can manage the music on the device like a hard drive. I can plug into friend's computers without having to carry around a disk with drivers.

      Just a last thing about all the sorting and stuff. A lot of my music files don't have tags, 'cos I ripped them way back in the day before I knew better and wrote them on CDs. So where does that leave me when everything is organised by tags?

      My Archos is simple, reliable, and it was cheaper than the competition when I bought it. Case closed.

      --
      Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
    5. Re:creeping featurism by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 1
      I have not used iTunes or an iPod before. I do not understand how easy it would be to set the tags on lots of untagged files. I use an Archos, and don't store all the files on it on my HD at the same time. I transcode from OGGs (spare me the quality lecture). I would like to know whether the iPod/iTunes combination would work in a situation like that. In other words,
      • can you move files to the iPod without 'syncing'?
      • does iTunes have some kind of file list storage so that I can create playlists of the stuff on my iPod on my computer even if the computer doesn't have the files?
      • does it handle untagged files gracefully or have a feature to get the tags on new files quickly (I'm talking legacy - the new files I rip have tags, the old ones didn't always)?
      --
      Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
    6. Re:creeping featurism by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      1) Syncing is not required to copy files to the iPod. You can simply drag them to the iPod and they will be added to the iPod's library.

      2) The iPod has fully support for normal and smart playlists. You can make a playlist on the iPod of files on the iPod and then play that playlist, either on the iPod itself or from iTunes. Smart playlist automagically generate given particular parameters. Any information about a song stored in the database (title, genre, now even BPM) can be used to make a smart playlist. I've got a list that plays 25 songs I haven't listened to in the past 30 days.

      3) iTunes can be the untagged MP3 owner's dream. You can select a bunch of files, Get Info (via command+I, right clock, or the toolbar) and add all the information you want to a group of songs. Now you can even add a record's cover art to any group of songs. Adding tag information doesn't do a thing to the files' filenames, the iPod/iTunes doesn't even both with filename if an ID3 tag is present.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    7. Re:creeping featurism by nelziq · · Score: 1
      On my computer, I organize my MP3s using the file system.

      Hello? The 80s called. They want their metadata back.

    8. Re:creeping featurism by MasonMcD · · Score: 1

      On my computer, I organize my MP3s using the file system. E.g., if I want to listen to "Dark Side of the Moon", it's in "music/rock/Pink Floyd/Dark Side of the Moon".

      Holy crap! You complain they have too many features, and there you go, making your own navigation feature set! How many people have time to set up those directories if they just want to listen to music? Or are you saying you have a program that creates those directories from ripped CDs?

    9. Re:creeping featurism by CineK · · Score: 1

      Actually linux GRIP + CDPARANOIA + whatever encoder does put your mp3s into correct folders :)

      --
      -- echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb31350717901017685 42287578439snlbxq'|dc
  102. Because no one cares! * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (no one in this case meaning not enough to justify production by a large firm.)

    OGG? Was that the kid that hung out with Mork in the sitcom?

  103. Load this up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out earth2willi.com for lots of free music downloads to install on your iPod or Zen.. It's registration and advertisement free, untouched by the RIAA, available in various genre and fileformats, complete with print resolution artwork, and uncrippled by DRM.

  104. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...done it dozens of times...?

    Apple should fix...

    Try a USB ethernet dongle...and some cheese w/your whine.

    ...and one day the pin just broke off for no reason ...I'd hazard to say that karma was high on the 'reason' list.

    You, my man, are a walking disaster. I feel sorry for the dealer you buy your next car from...and your girlfriend.

    And it hit her right on the head, and the Docter said it wasn't his fault and there was nothing he could do about it!

  105. Archos all the way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Both the iPod and all of Creative's stuff need proprietary software that keeps you locked out of direct control of your music files. The iPod can store data files, but on a different "realm" from it's mp3 area, so you don't have direct access to your mp3's unless you are using iTunes, which would be wodely despised if it was made by Microsoft.
    Same thing with Creative, except it's even worse since Creative can't code for shit, whereas Apple can make good software when they want to. So yeah, there's ephpod on the PC for the iPod, there's notmad for the Zen, etc, but you are always in the same boat: closed systems, closed software, limited access.

    I couldn't be happier with my 20 GB Archos FM Recorder. It's a little bulky and not as good looking as the iPod or Zen, but it records mp3's in real time, has direct USB2 connector, mounts like an actual hard drive volume on your desktop with full access to ALL files on both Mac and PC - no drivers or extraneous software needed, battery lasts for about 10 hours of actual usage, there's enthusiast, homebrew firmware for it that adds a ton of features and improves performance, you can hack it yourself, it sounds great, It's got a built-on FM radio, it records mp3's in real time from a built in Mic, line-in OR the FM radio, it can withstand significant shocks, you can make your playlists with good old Winamp exactly the same way you would make any other playlist, just save it on your Archos and go. And possibly by favorite feature, you don't have to organize every single ID3 tag in your reams of mp3 files, because you browse your music through watever directories you setup, not an forced ID3-based sorting system like iPod or Nomads, which royally blows ... dump 10 GBs of your own mp3 files on one of these and you will know what I mean when you see 5 entries for "The Cure", "TheCure" "Cure", "The_Cure" and "Teh Cure".

    And finally... You can get this gem for $270 retail. I don't see how you can beat that, unless style is a deal breaker for you.

  106. A comparison huh... by Nexum · · Score: 1

    Well there are a lot of people who seem o be misguided, so let's take a look at the little things and see where that $100 extra on the iPod goes

    For starters, OK, the Zen is a 60GB monster - but WHO here HAS 60GB of music? Maybe one or two will perk up, but when we're all honest I think that those of us who would use all that space for tunes is laughably slim.

    And let's say you DO stock up on 60GB of tunes - the UI (hardware and software - note the thumbwheel) is far superior on the iPod. I know which one I prefer scrolling through thousands of songs on.

    And isn't a 60GB drive likeley to have more platters, meaning more weight to spin, meaning shorter batterylife (or compensate with heavier battery)?

    Does the Zen have AAC? Uh... No.

    And according to those who are supposed to know, AAC is supposed to get near to twice the compression at the same quality (measured aurally not bitrate) - so I guess the 30GB iPod can store fairly close to the 60GB Zen if you wanted.

    I know which one is sexier too.

    I know whether I would rather have FireWire or USB2 too (but admittedly your mileage may vary).

    And those who claim the Zen has a larger community - go see ipoding.com

    And does th Zen have the Breakout game? No... didn't think so :) -A happy iPod owner (so I am a little biased, but I dont think you can argue with the points above)

    --

    This sig has been deprecated.
  107. You do realise... by idontneedanickname · · Score: 1
    You do realise that the iPod is supposed to be used as an accessory? The way it was designed, it was supposed to only store the music you're likely to listen to for the next week. You could rotate the songs on your PC/Mac to the iPod every once in a while to maintain some diversity. What are you gonna do when your iPod get's stolen? Yea, you'll have to spend the dozens of hours re-ripping all your music because you probably don't have a copy on your PC/Mac.

    To summarize, the iPod is meant to be used to carry around part of your collection (where 5 gigs are fine for a few days, and 10gigs are fine for a vacation) to listen to. Keywords: part, and a few days.

    1. Re:You do realise... by Paul+Carver · · Score: 1

      Uggg, how awful. Why would you want to rotate music on and off your player? Do you always know in advance what you're going to want to listen to? If you're going to do that you might as well get an MP3 player without a hard drive. My two year old, 20GB player is getting full. The iPod is a nice physical size, but the price is making the decision tough. The 30GB model is only a 50% improvement over mine and the others aren't even in consideration.

    2. Re:You do realise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proper use for an iPod is to carry around a copy of your whole collection.

      Unfortunately, the technology is not there yet; even using lossy compression (128 Kbps MP3/AAC), the 30 GB iPod can only hold the equivalent of approximately 400 to 600 of your CDs and LPs. I know that the recording industry's average U.S. revenue works out to only about 130 CDs / decade of purchasing / family of four, but someone who's into music can easily own enough CDs to overflow an iPod.

      That's still enough of an advance over what you can carry around using other technologies to make the iPod a revolutionary, amazing little device.

  108. Heck I just like the fact by Dead_B0b · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that the iPod can recharge its batteries over firewire...
    in under an hour.
    I really do not think a USB2 device can do that.

    1. Re:Heck I just like the fact by Nef · · Score: 1

      Well, yes and no...

      It normally takes my Zen about double that time to get a full recharge from USB only. Which in an of itself is not all that bad. One thing that does irritate the shit out of me though: If you are using playcenter or notmad to transfer music, the Connection manager does a sort of keep alive to the device. While it is in connected mode, you can't recharge (I believe this is purely a firmware issue. I mean, if you're not actively transferring files, I see no reason the USB port couldn't supply enough current to charge the device, but alas, it will not) So I have found myself on occassion forgetting that the soft connect was on and I wake up the next morning to find it completely dead, which takes about 3-4 hours to recharge fully using the AC adapter.

  109. Archos Multimedia Jukebox by Mr.+White · · Score: 2, Informative


    I have a 20gig Archos Jukebox. It's a souped up mp3 player. In additition to storing and playing mp3s, the thing has a little LCD screen, and it plays MOVIES! Or it can output the signal to a TV.

    Additionally, it has compact flash and SD adaptors, so you can download the pictures from your camera to the device. This is handy when travelling: you can empty your CF cards and browse photos on the Archos whenever you feel like.

    Additional size is always a plus, but stats rarely tell the whole story.

    Witold
    www.witold.org

  110. Nomad 85% larger by bobdotorg · · Score: 1

    Not sure I would call the Nomad 'pocket sized':

    Nomad: 112.6 x 75.9 x 24.5 mm = 209 cc
    Ipod: 104.1 x 58.8 x 18.54 mm = 113 cc

    209 / 113 = 1.85

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  111. What about protected CDs? by ic3p1ck · · Score: 1

    This is all good-and-well but the problem is what happens in future with more copy protected CDs being released?

    I have a HTPC at home with my entire (legal) collection of ripped MP3s. I use Musicmatch Jukebox and its very convenient to have the entire collection available on HDD.

    I've yet to run into a copy protected disk, but I know they're out there waiting to ruin my fair use of music I've purchased.

    What are we going to do in future?

  112. Comparison by newkid · · Score: 1
    The interest in the Zen comes from its higher capacity/price ratio. This is acheived by using a 2.5" drive instead of a 1.8" drive like in the iPod. This is why the Zen is larger and heavier.

    I have used both units and the first thing that I've noticed is that the Zen is much noisier and vibrates a lot. You can feel the drive inertia when you move the unit around.

  113. 60GB? That's way too much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a long-time user of the original portable HD-based MP3 player, the portable jukebox(www.pjbox.com), I've only been able to fill my mp3 player (20GB capacity) with 5GB worth of songs (and, keep in mind that I've had my player for three years now--long before the iPod was on any drawing board). As it stands, I can play my entire collection for two to three days straight without having the same song play twice. I've finally reached a point where I'm running out of songs to put into that player, and its quite mind-boggling to think that I still have an additional 15GB left before I can fill this thing to capacity.

    And 60GB, you say? Thanks, but no thanks. :)

    I'm still working on filling Old Faithful here. Sure, she might be ugly. Yeah, she might be 'fat' compared to the newer versions.

    But this big momma can still sing, and it'll be another 15GBs before this fat lady stops singing.

  114. right on the money by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful


    FosterKanig, You are spot-on with the point about competition making both products better. Apple keeps revving the iPod adding new features precisely because companies like Creative are chasing after them.
    1. Re:right on the money by gig · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know what's funny is that I was shocked to read above that a top guy at Creative wouldn't know what is up with MPEG-4 and especially AAC, and not even know that everything Apple (Mac OS X, QuickTime, all Mac apps, iPod, iTunes) are all fully MPEG-4 and AAC.

      Then the next question the Creative guy goes to is about 48kHz sample rates! The CEO of Creative wants you to use Windows Media and he doesn't even realize that 48kHz is itself like the Windows Media format of the 1980's.

      The 48kHz sample rate was chosen by the RIAA for "consumer" digital audio recording (DAT, MiniDisc, Hi8) so as to make it harder to make CD's from those recordings.

      The small increase in quality you get by sampling at 48kHz instead of 44.1kHz does not pay for the HUGE decrease in audio quality you get by a Sample Rate Reduction from 48kHz to 44.1kHz. It's more destructive than converting to analog and then back to digital with good converters.

      To still be talking 48kHz in 2003 is abysmal. The next rate that's useful above 44.1 is 96kHz, which is high up enough and done at 24-bit or 32-bit and gains you so much quality that you can then come down to 44.1 right at the end and you're better than if you stayed there through the whole process.

      Creative's stuff is sub-par. It's good PC gear but it's not good audio gear. iPod is both good PC gear and good audio gear.

      In short, iPod and Apple are MUSICAL ALREADY. Creative are not as creative as Apple.

    2. Re:right on the money by mhbtr · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about... 48 is for professional DAT recording, and is what most music is still mastered in. Consumer DAT decks had SCMS to protect, not a sampling rate issues. If you look at the math, 48 works much better into 96, 192, etc. - not 44.1. When I record at 24 bit, I always use 48 - NOT 44.1. The difference in bringing that down to 44.1/16 is amazing - sounds way better than originally recording at 44.1/16. 48 was NOT chosen by the RIAA. I have no idea why people use the letters RIAA whenever they want to complain about ANYTHING music related - as far as I know they did not set the digital audio recording standards...... That creative labs stuff is subpar, I will agree, but research your facts on 48Khz and why it was chosen before making such a silly post... Eytan

  115. Never will I buy a Nomad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have sworn that I will never buy anything from Creative Labs. NEVER AGAIN . After all the crashes that the SB Live Platinum 5.1 has caused my Windows 98 box (it was bought in the days when it was the top of the creative range, and 98 was the major Windows OS), with no patches, nothing to resolve the problems, and absolutely no help from Creative, I do not trust them.

    Creative has burnt me. Fool me once, and all that. Even if Apple's iPod is double the price for half the features, and the only alternative, I will not buy a Nomad.

  116. Why is there no support for Ogg Vorbis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The perplexing thing about the lack of Ogg Vorbis support (which I only use because it sounds fantastic) is that it is a competitive environment out there right now for portable audio players. And the fact that supporting Ogg Vorbis costs nothing. It's a free and clear license and it would seem that whoever supported it would have a leg up on the competiton.

    People who read /., people who like open source, people who use Ogg Vorbis, tech people.... these are people who love digital devices and buy them in droves. We make up a huge portion of the audience that these audio players are trying to lure. Why wouldn't they want to support a free and high quality codec that many of us use?

    It'll eventually happen, but it's a shame that it hasn't already.

  117. Memory Stick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it take a Sony Memory Stick? I don't buy any personal electronics products anymore that don't accept the Memory Stick.

    1. Re:Memory Stick? by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      it has a 20/60 gig harddrive. it has no need for a memory stick....

  118. Chicks Dig the IPod.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said..... be a windows loser if you need to

  119. apple users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would just like to say, fuck you apple user, every one of you.

    Thank you.

  120. Can you take either jogging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a horrible RCA Lyra thing with 64megs of flash. This thing requires you use windows, and have an account with *administrator* privileges in order to upload songs to it! All the songs are then encrypted so you can't save them anywhere else and it won't play anything other than mp3s that have been encrypted.

    I'd love to get an iPod or Nomad. But will either work if I take them running?

    1. Re:Can you take either jogging? by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      ipod would fit in your pocket for jogging with the nomads added size its a good idea to use the belt clip on the case

  121. PhatNoise car player is in beta now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get phat, dude ...

    http://www.phatnoise.com/products/digitalmediaplay ers/index.php

    http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT= SVBIZINK8.story&STORY=/www/story/05-06-2003/000194 0946&EDATE=TUE+May+06+2003,+08:19+AM

  122. oops ... here are those links ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first /. post and I hit submit instead of preview. Please accept my sorries ...

    PhatNoise product page

    Press release

  123. Where's the coke can? by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

    That image needs a reference object for those of us who don't know the size of either player. If I go by "actual size" on my 17" monitor, they're both friggin' huge! ;-)

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
    1. Re:Where's the coke can? by Zugok · · Score: 1

      yeah but I think a more approporiate reference is a packet of cigarettes

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
  124. On the subject of Nomad JB's by WaKall · · Score: 1

    I had the original Nomad Jukebox (silver/blue, 6GB) and I think it was a piece of shite. The UI wasn't terrible, but the software clearly sucked. Battery life wasn't great at all, and to top it off the firmware/hardware was totally retarded with regards to re-charging the batteries.

    Most of the time when I'd plug it in, it would refuse to charge the batteries. Occasionally this could be solved by leaving the unit on/plugged in, and taking out / re-inserting one of the four (4!) AA rechargeables. But that quit working, and I gave up on the unit.

    The size (dimensions and storage), I could live with. But the poor battery life AND not being able to recharge, that was the final straw.

  125. hrmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bigger.. yes. Cheaper.. yes. Cooler.. no.

  126. Image of size comparison by Patik · · Score: 1
    An iPod on top of a Zen

    It doesn't look to be as big of a difference as the math makes it out to be.

    1. Re:Image of size comparison by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Having seen them both in real life, I have to point out that the difference is much larger than the pictures show. The iPod is just small enough that I wouldn't mind sticking it in a pants pocket without having an unseemly bulge. A shirt pocket is streching it, but doable if you're one of those whose accustomed to putting pens and stuff in there anyway. The Zen is definately too large to be comfortably pocketable, except maybe in my cargo pants. Even then, the weight and thickness are the killer, not really width or height.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  127. better link by Patik · · Score: 1

    Actually here's some more telling pictures from different angles.

  128. I bought a Nomad III and returned it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They require that you use some really crappy Windows only software in order to access the device. I decided that I was not going to support a product that would not emulate a more generic USB storage device.

    It would not have been quite as bad if they'd simply used a proprietary driver that then emulated USB storage.. But NOoo. They want you to use their lousy tool.

    Also, I did some fairly extensive analysis on the quality of their MP3 recording. Their encoder was absolute crap. Lots of jitter, even on very simple signals. LAME blew it away.

    I did like the ability to record in raw (WAV) format and the price..

    Circuit City took it back, no questions asked. Pretty awesome.

    Unfortunately, the Zen product has no Line-In and uses some 'FM wired remote', so it may lose to the Nomad in that regard.

  129. Data support, bookmarks by fm6 · · Score: 1
    The unit also easily stores data files. w00t!
    That's a pretty standard feature nowadays. Question is, how easy is it to get files to and from the device?. I wouldn't buy an external storage device, no matter its other features, unless it knew how to act like an external disk drive. Anything else is too much trouble. Maybe Zen (Standard by 8!) has this feature, but then why do I see this on the web site: "Creative File Manager: Move non-music files quickly and easily with this handy little program that fits on a floppy"

    Another feature I keep looking for in jukeboxes is a bookmark feature, so I can resume listening the the middle of a track. I listen to a lot of spoken word stuff, so I won't get a jukebox without this feature. The new iPod seems to have it, but only for Audible.com downloads. Or am I mistaken?

    1. Re:Data support, bookmarks by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 1

      All of the iPods that can play Audible files can resume from where you stopped them.

      Of course, for MP3s and such, you can always scrub to roughly where you left off and listen from there.

    2. Re:Data support, bookmarks by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I knew that. It's on the Apple site. But it sucks that they deliberately turn off this feature for other content. I suspect that jukeboxes leave off bookmarks specificially to avoid pissing off content vendors like Audible.

      As for "scrubbing" ... come on, some of my audio files are an hour long.

    3. Re:Data support, bookmarks by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 1

      Well, in your post, you made it sound like you weren't sure. That whole "Or am I mistaken?" must have thrown me off. Perhaps you were wondering about resuming from MP3s. Just trying (and aparently, failing miserably) to be helpful.

      Anyway, I have some files that are way over an hour. Some lectures that I have are over an hour and a half. I scrub through them with no problem. I can usually hit the spot that I'm aiming for within two seconds.

    4. Re:Data support, bookmarks by stealthv · · Score: 1

      Resuming is kind of there in the iPod. When you want to stop just pause the track and let the iPod turn itself off. When you turn it back on and press play you'll be right back where you were. Obviously this only works for the last track you were listening to. This works on the old iPods so I imagine things are the same on the new models.

      I know this isn't exactly what you want but it's better than nothing (I guess)

    5. Re:Data support, bookmarks by fm6 · · Score: 1
      So the iPod remembers exactly where you were when you pushed "pause", even after a power cycle? Not just the track, the position on the track? Even for hour-long tracks? If so, you just sold me an iPod!

      Too bad I'm broke and unemployed. Oh well, something to look forward to.

    6. Re:Data support, bookmarks by stealthv · · Score: 1

      Yes it remembers the exact spot.

      As I said, in the older models you have to let it power-off by itself for this to work. Apparently in the new models this isn't a problem. I don't have a new one so I can't confirm this.

    7. Re:Data support, bookmarks by fm6 · · Score: 1
      As I said, in the older models you have to let it power-off by itself for this to work.
      That's amusing. I used to have a Phillips Rush 107 (stolen, and after fighting its design flaws and driver bugs, I can't bring myself to replace it) with exactly the opposite problem: it remembered where you were when you pressed STOP, even if it powered down. But if it powered down while PAUSEd, it'd forget where it was.

      Anyway, thanks for the info. Too bad Apple doesn't think to provide this info -- they almost missed a sale!

  130. Zen screen resolution lower, while 60% heavier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note that the Zen has less than half the screen resolution of the iPod, and the Zen device is substantially (~60%) heavier. It's larger to boot.

    These things are important to me, and if they are to you, then the $100 is easily worth it. (Heck, that's only about 8 CDs, or 10 downloaded CDs from Apple's Music Store.)

    (Posted because no one noted the screen resolution difference.)

  131. New ipod has Firewire and USB 2.0 by acomj · · Score: 1

    Bzzzt...the New ipod has both Firewire and USB 2.0.

    1. Re:New ipod has Firewire and USB 2.0 by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Right. Which in no way invalidates my statement that the Nomad has just USB 2.0.

  132. New Ipod smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new ipod is smaller than the old one. So although your photos are interesting, they don't tell the whole story.

  133. Archos has video by wotevah · · Score: 1
    Still with a 20Gb disk but has video on a small LCD screen, TV out, an mp3 audio recorder and I think you can also get a video recorder module for it.

    www.archos.com

    From the specs:
    Video playback: MPEG-4 SP with MP3 stereo sound, near-DVD quality. Resolution up to 640x368 @25f/s. AVI file format, reads XviD and DivX(TM)* 4.0 & 5.0
    Music playback: Stereo MP3 decoding @ 30-320 Kbits/s. CBR & VBR
    Music recording: Stereo MP3 encoding @ 30-160 Kbits/s. VBR
    Photo viewer: JPEG or BMP of any size
    Display: TV output or built-in color LCD (237x234)

    1. Re:Archos has video by gig · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's not actually MPEG-4.

      It's Microsoft-brand MPEG-4.

      The whole Mac and iPod platforms are real, unadulterated MPEG-4.

      You are throwing away money on an Archos. You're better with a CD/MP3 CD discman and saving for an iPod.

    2. Re:Archos has video by DeBaas · · Score: 1
      The whole Mac and iPod platforms are real, unadulterated MPEG-4.


      unadulterated.... unusable as well, without the SCREEN!
      --
      ---
    3. Re:Archos has video by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      OMG you're right! Macs don't have screens!

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    4. Re:Archos has video by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      Macs do, Ipods don't, Archos does. This thread is about the Archos letting you watch video!

      --
      ---
  134. Re:I'll go for the cheaper one this time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh, and let me guess, can you not get firmware upgrades for the iPod? Because of course we all know how Apple feels about upgrades..."

    No, I don't know how Apple feels about upgrades unless you mean that upgrading Apple products is easier than picking your nose. Pretty much all Apple software is updated through Software Update (including iPod firmware), or you can grab them off apple.com if you're a Windows person.

    I get the feeling you think Apple doesn't allow for upgrades in its products, and of course that is totally insane. Linux has already been ported to the iPod so I think it's a safe bet that the iPod allowns the firmware to be changed.

  135. Used iPod by Zaknafein500 · · Score: 1

    Just do what I did, and buy a used iPod. Then, you get the best of both worlds. Low(er) price, and great interface and features.

    --

    "The guide is definitive, reality is frequently inaccurate."
    1. Re:Used iPod by berniecase · · Score: 1

      Or refurbished.... I bought one directly from Apple and managed to get the 1-yr warranty and an iPod that looked as good as a brand new one. All for $200 (last December).

  136. it is not the features, it's the qualitative diff by edstromp · · Score: 1

    For me, it really isn't about the GB of storage, or, for that matter, really the size. It is about the ease of use and the integration.

    Apple's iPod (and Apple with all of their products) offers a great experience and great integration between the music player on the machine (iTunes) and purchasing music online (applemusic.com).

    Sure the Nomad might be able to do some of those things, but is the experience as good as with the iPod?

  137. A first impression of the iPod v Nomad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an Apple slut. I use iPhoto to print photos online, even though I know of other cheaper services. But none so convenient. I'm a .mac user (which is a good value if you use all the goodies that come with it, but not a good value if you're just looking for email service). And I have a G4 tower.

    But I thought this whole MP3 player thing was a fad, and I was bummed when Apple announced the original iPod. Does anybody besides me remember the Apple digital camera... I think it was called the one-click (not to be confused with the Amazon service licensed by Apple). It was an also ran in digital camera space...not so much better than the competition and before the market was mature. I thought that is what the iPod was going to be.

    But holy cow. tonight I went to CompUSA specifically for the purpose of looking at an iPod. Next to it was a Nomad Jukebox. I played with both of them for a while, and reached one singular conclusion.

    The iPod is a vastly superior product, regardless of the capacity and price difference.

    I am going to ask for an iPod for Father's day. A year after the original iPod, I still don't see anythng on the market that's as good as the original. for me, Apple has the only product in this space worth purchasing at any price. The rest of them are junk, and the iPod is the only decent player I've seen.

  138. to keep this all in perspective by gandhii · · Score: 1

    a few months ago i bought a cd mp3 player that plays audio cds, cd's burnt with mp3's and even vcds for only $51.. sure its a cheep taiwanese piece of crap, but its incredibly useful, plays everything i got.. (why would i have anything in those other formats?) and when i accidentally dropped it several feet onto hard concrete floor and put a crack in the lcd screen.. i cried a whole lot less than i would have had i actually spent like a $100 or more on it. Besides, it still works, can't read the track number anymore, but just having a track number wasnt very useful to begin with.. (get what you pay for) And when I decided to look for and buy an mp3 cd player i was expecting to pay alot more.

    BTW.. the burned cd's hold "data files" too.

  139. does not computer by autopr0n · · Score: 1, Troll

    iPod sports AAC. That's the kicker. I'd rather have quality than quantity.

    Well, all the testing I've seen says AAC sounds worse then MP3, not better. Not that apple zelots would notice..

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:does not computer by Frac · · Score: 1

      Well, all the testing I've seen says AAC sounds worse then MP3, not better. Not that apple zelots would notice..

      Actually all the testing I've seen says AAC sounds much better than MP3.

      I guess that makes us even, and I'm rubber and you're glue eh?

    2. Re:does not computer by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Here's the tie breaker.

      I've listened to my iPod on my JE Labs 300B tube amp. Why should you be impressed? Because the JEL is much higher resolution than the average transistor amp, and so it delivers a louder version of what you hear on headphones across a full soundstage. And 128 kbit AAC sounds better than even my 192 kbit minimum HQ VBR recordings on MP3. Just listen to the resolution phase of a cymbal hit with somebody singing over it...there's no stereo washing, no audible squaring of the signal. Personally, I don't rip at 128kbit even with AAC...I use 192 kbit minimum, just to deliver as much breathing room as possible to the compiler.

      Which is why I got a 30 gig iPod and not a Zen. That, and the smaller size, better battery life, cool retro Mac SE font, simple navigation, iTunes/MusicMatch integration, tough seamless touch controls (great for use at the gym...no need to worry about my sweat ruining expensive hardware), note reader and backlight which matches my car's interior lights. These things (specially the battery life) are well worth the $100 price difference and size drop.

      Of course, you might be one of these assholes who needs everything cheap and hackable. I have one here at work who over the years has at spent least $1000 on mp3 players from Rios to Apex DVD players to that dumb Nomad keychain player and was apalled that I just wanted to use the thing as an mp3 player. When I mentioned I sold my Toshiba e740 with wireless and a gig of flash memory, for way less than it was worth to buy this thing, I thought he was going to hit me with his Archos jukebox. And that thing weighs like 5 pounds!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  140. Two comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do so many freakin people have to run in and post "Will it play ogg?" Can't these people READ? freakin morons.

    And 2) Since when has /. become "mac heaven" ?

  141. Zen more susceptible to shock? by kakos · · Score: 1

    I heard that a HDD becomes more susceptible to shock when it has more platters. I know that the iPod uses a single platter HDD card. I'm guessing that the Nomad Zen uses a 2+ platter HDD. Will this make the Zen more susceptible to shock?

    I ask because the primary concern I have when considering these devices is how bad a drop is for the device. Obviously, dropping a device is bad for any device, but is potentially a lot worse for a device with a HDD in it. If the iPod is less likely to fail after a drop or two, I'd definately get it over the Zen.

    1. Re:Zen more susceptible to shock? by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      i dropped my zen down a flight of stairs, didnt skip at all. i dropped my zen from about 5-6ft up onto a concrete floor and it didnt skip. the zen is a very durable device compared to the ipod which can be scratched while running a dull fingernail over it

    2. Re:Zen more susceptible to shock? by Troll_in_Captivity · · Score: 1

      Maybe you need to stop carrying your Zen in your mouth. It has a belt clip ya know?

      --

      Sigs are for hypocrits
  142. Email... by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Good god, that thing supports email. How the hell are you supposed to type in a message!?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Email... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic, but according to the user manual, it functions as a removable hard drive that stores your mail settings

  143. My Zen/iPod Experiences by Raven001 · · Score: 4, Informative

    After an obsessive amount of research on both the iPod and the Zen, I bought a Zen.

    After using the Zen extensively, I returned it for an iPod.

    Initially, I was attracted to the Zen for these reasons:

    - Price Value .. I got the Zen for $300, which was $200-less than a comparable iPod.

    - "Playlist on the Fly" Options .. I like to be able to listen to WHAT I want, WHEN I want, without having to futz with the iPod after each song (pre-programmed playlists have never worked well for me.. I have spontaneous music-needs

    - Expandability .. From what I've read, it's quite easy to upgrade your Zen to 40 (or even 60!) gigabytes. This always appealed to me, in case I find my music collection suddenly growing by a factor of 4

    - FM Radio / Radio Recording / Voice Recording (with add-on remote) .. These features weren't deal-breakers for me, but I figured they'd be nice to have (especially the voice recording).

    - Looks.
    Everyone here who has been ragging on the Zen's looks has a) never seen one in real life or b) has no tastes .. because the Zen looks AMAZING (it easily rivals the iPod in this regard). The metal-outside feels so much sturdier as well, and unlike the iPod, doesn't scratch at ALL.

    I ended up returning it for these reasons:

    - The user-interface was AWFUL (IMHO). To get to a particular artist would take me at least twice as long as it takes me on my iPod. Little quirks - like having to scroll to "OPEN" before you could browse an artist or album got annoying pretty quick.

    - The screen is small.. it's still very usable, but not nearly as easy-to-see as the iPod's.

    - The scroll-wheel was a bear to use, and scrolling through long lists was not fun (this was after a firmware-upgrade, which improved this problem somewhat).

    - The buttons were not overly-easy to press, which made using the Zen a challenge when using one hand. This wasn't a huge problem, but after seeing how easy the iPod is to use, I realized how the Zen is lacking in this area.

    - There are NO accessories for the Zen (unlike the iPod, which has cases, stands, docking stations, etc, etc.) - This alone, however, was hardly a deal breaker, but being stuck with Creative's case wasn't fun (it's bulky and ugly).

    ---

    Oh, one other significant difference between the two is the support you will be getting if you ever have a problem with your player. From everything I've read, Creative's 90 day-support is anywhere from "decent" to "awful", and Apple's 1 year support is nothing short of amazing (this is simply based on stories I've heard, not any statistics). Still, I was uncomfortable owning the Zen knowing that Creative only supported it for 90 days.. that's unacceptable for a consumer product of that price.

    People like to compare the software that goes along with each of the players, but that's pretty trivial IMO. For the Zen, get Notmad Explorer (It'll save you a LOT of headaches), and for the iPod, get ephPod (It'll save you a LOT of headaches). Both of those programs are amazing, and make transferring to your portable-player a cinch.

    I'm now a happy owner of an Apple iPod (a 20-gigger). Using some coupon codes I found for Dell, it only cost me about $420 - which is only $70 more than the $350 Zen (they discontinued the Zen's rebate, correct?). If FM-Radio, voice recording, WMA support, or expandability are essential to you, by all means, go with the Zen. Otherwise, I'd recommend the iPod to anybody.

    Of course, before you buy EITHER player, you should go down to your local CompUSA and hold both of them in your hands. This is important, do not skip this step!

    If anyone has any questions about either player, just ask...

    Raven001

    1. Re:My Zen/iPod Experiences by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      they didnt discontinue the rebate as they stopped selling the firewire model all together. now its just the usb2.0 version that can be found as low as $257 shipped

    2. Re:My Zen/iPod Experiences by Raven001 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I know my numbers are slightly off (seeing as how I bought my 'Pod in early Feburary!). Either way though, the Zen is cheaper and, IMO, the iPod is better =)

  144. iPod Zen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own the Zen, but I would love to have the iPod. Money is the problem. The Zen is not so big as to be a problem. My main concern is in sound quality and the Zen has that in abundanace. As far as I am concerned, niether is perfect. Only a player that is small, sleek, cheap, sounds good, has firewire and USB2, needs no drivers, plays EVERYTHING, has tons of storage, has good support, has good software, etc etc will do. For those that think 60 GB is stupid, are you capable of hearing the aweful artifacts in crappy low bit rate MP3s? I am, and they come out even more on the Zen thanks to it's incredible sound quality. Due to this, I am in the process of re-encoding my entire 50+ GB collection of MP3's to a higher bitrate. I think that the iTunes is really cool, I do not however trust 128 kpbs ANYTHING. So, even if the Zen played 128 kbps AAC, I would not be totally satisfied. In the future, I will be upgrading my Zen to 60 GB. This is not to be able to carry ALL my music, but to be able to carry all the music I WANT to with HIGH (read transparent) sound quality, and still have room for files when I need it. Yes, the iPod is smaller, yes it's WAY cooler, yes I would love to have the iPod. But the Zen is great, sounds good, is small enough and is affordable. If you can't come up with the cash, what difference does it make what it looks like and how small it is.

  145. On the contrary... by g_bit · · Score: 1

    I am an anti-Apple slut, but I have to agree with you. The iPod is a vastly superior product to anything else available.

    Granted, I haven't tried all of them, I'm going on reviews and general consensus. Also, personal experience. I do own an iPod though and before that I used my girlfriend as a guinea pig for a beast known as the Archos Player. (I'm evil, I know ;) It sucked hard-core.

    The thing that really ticks me off is that no manufacturer really takes it all the way. Not even Apple, they just come the closest. I mean, how can it be that nobody came up with the idea of a *bigger* LCD (iPod had the biggest when it first came out...not sure now). Why do so many players have only buttons and no dial-like apparatus? Why can hardly any of them record? How about a mini speaker on the outside so a group could listen to something funny (or you could annoy someone :)

    There are so many possible features that you could add to an MP3 player and the only one that seem to come close is the iPod. The world isn't perfect I guess.

    1. Re:On the contrary... by geniusj · · Score: 1

      I believe the reason you don't see the scroll wheel on mp3 players is because apple patented it. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember hearing about this.

      Cheers,
      -JD-

    2. Re:On the contrary... by scottgfx · · Score: 1

      Quote: "I am an anti-Apple slut"

      Oh, come on. Join us!

      --
      It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
    3. Re:On the contrary... by MrMickS · · Score: 1

      My Rio 500 MP3 player had a jog dial on the side that would allow you to go up and down the menus and select, it may also have managed volume control whilst playing back. Not a scroll wheel but it did the same job. IIRC this is patented by Sony so maybe that's an issue.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
  146. Rediculous by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I've had two things break on my (sony) laptop. One, the I lost the ability to charge the thing* Sony sent me a new power brick, and when that didn't work, they replaced the fuse for fre. Second, the little plastic latch broke, and again sony fixed it for free.

    Shit breaks. If it's under warrenty, it should be fixed.

    *(I was trying to run the 'top off of my car's power adaptor and blew a fuse. I didn't tell them this, of course)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  147. There are several more players by adsl · · Score: 1

    Try the eDigital Odessey 1000 http://electronics.cnet.com/electronics/0-6342420- 1317-20845399.html?tag=subnav Just slightly larger than an IPOD much much more functionality. Then we have several coming out very very soon http://electronics.cnet.com/electronics/0-6342420- 8-20775862-1.html?tag=dir Look at the Samsunp YEPP YP-9000 or iRiver HP-1000 Then we have the all singing all dancing Philips HDD100 Overall Apple seem to have decided to "give up" on innovation and concentrate on getting smaller at a cost of a lack of functionality and an even smaller battery. Shame upon you SJ. I can see a new IPOD within 15 months when Apple have a war meeting. Of course the new One inch HDs reaching OEMs as we speak with capacity of 1-5GBs will likely launch a whole new range of tiny HD based players starting in July........

  148. iPod is the smallest. by g_bit · · Score: 1
    I believe the iPod is the smallest around, as far as Hard Drive driven players goes.

    I also own one and I can tell you that you can definitely take it anywhere. I even dropped mine once on a cement floor that was covered with a short-pile carpet (hardly any carpet). It's been about 3 months since then, and no problems.

  149. Hrm... by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Actualy, I'd say the zen actualy looks smoother then the iPod. (nicer name to :P)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  150. $US or $CAN? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    $1.99 in canadian money isn't all that much :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  151. volume? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Who the hell mesures the size of objects in volume? a 75% volume increase comes from just a 20% linear increase in all dimensions, which is what would matter for most people.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:volume? by orcrist · · Score: 1

      Who the hell mesures the size of objects in volume?

      People who are interested in knowing how much space something will take up? Face it, you're not parking the player like a car in a parking spot, and you're not interested in how much wallpaper you'd need to cover it. You want to know how much space it will take in your pocket, bag, etc. That's generally volume.

      geez.
      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  152. Whoa there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may not have intended to, but you make it sound as if you can use "cp" to copy songs onto the iPod. This is not the case; well, you can copy the song and have it available as a file, but you also have to write the song info into the iPod's database before you can play it using the device.

    There are GPLed tools for writing to the iPod's database, but last I checked most users are just running ephpod, a windows program, using wine.

  153. Lets get serious by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Who in the world needs to tote 60 gigs of MP3's around? So they're telling me the average kid which is really the target group here keeps over 12,000 songs? (5 Meg average at 128k) That's over 923 cd's if the average was 13 songs per cd.

    Who in their right mind is going to try to sort through all that mess in the first place. And how much do their parents make that this person would own that many Cd's. Not to mention the passing fad's of songs and such managing that reguardless of the software application used would be a bigger nightmare.

    It would make sense that it would contain maybe the space for 20 cd's of current stuff you actually listen to. And only if it could understand me talking to it cause I'm not going blind and getting carpal tunnel just to find my copy of Hotel California buried in the thing.

    Seriously any company willing to market products as worthless as this deserves me selling all of the stock I own of them.

    Make it sensible and cheap sub 100 and then you have a killer app. Otherwise you just have the latest tech toy for the rich.

    1. Re:Lets get serious by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      its not meant for just mp3s. creative and apple both realize that people dont have 30 and 60gigs of mp3s. thats why they double as portable harddrives

    2. Re:Lets get serious by adsl · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should be a buyer, for around $90.00 of the Frontier Labs Nex IIe. For that sum it comes w/o memory but takes any CF Card of any size and any IBM Microdrive. Most of us have a few CF Cards so for less than $100 you could have your dream machine. it's close to mine except it has no FM. Bummer.

  154. Archos by dr1zzt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have done my research on all MP3 players. It took me about 3 years to buy one. The final debate was Archos over Ipod. I went with the Archos. Main reason was b/c it was DRM free, and it works on my Linux/WinXP/Mac boxes. Also the sound quality is great, Rockbox Rocks with their freeware software for the Archos. How many Ipod of Zen users say they can post to Apple or Creative about a bug, or new feature, and have the fix in a few days to weeks. Well you can not with APple or Creative, but yuo can with Archos/Rockbox.

    Also who gives a flying fudgsicle about what the thing looks like. I could care less that my Archos is not pretty. Can you drop your ipod down a flight of 10 stairs, and still have it playing a song when you pick it up from the fall. I can. I have had it happen, and not carpeted stairs, concrete stairs.

    ARCHOS is the way to go...cheap in price, yet it is of very high quality!

  155. iPod vs. Zen by when_i_nod_off · · Score: 0

    The Zen Jukebox is a piece o' crud. It's like comparing a porshe to a minivan. Sure the minivan is bigger and cheaper (both attributes apply to the objects physical construction as well) but quality and performance-wise you will have no contest.

    The iPod is a beautifully engineered piece of technology with one of the greatest and most intuitive interface designs of the digital age. The entire reason this topic is brought up is because the iPod has set the standard by which all future MP3 players are judged, that enough is tribute to its originality and value.

    No one can say which will "win" the sales or marketing game this early on, but my bets on the iPod and I also reckon you'll see a lot of disappointed reviews from those who purchase the Zen jukebox a little to hastily because of that $100 saving.

    And seriously folks... this goes for the iPod too.. who needs 30GB, let alone 60GB of tunes with them at any one time?!?! 15GB is the model I purchased (I've only got 11GB of MP3's/AAC's so far) and I'l be dead and gone the the time I convert all 8000 of my vinyl LPs to AAC!

  156. Wait for one that supports OGG.. by sudog · · Score: 1

    ..and as many other media formats as possible. Then you don't have to worry about locking yourself into the money-grubbing patent royalties of the Fraunhofer Institute.

  157. Battery life... by omarKhayyam · · Score: 1

    from the article:

    "Creative claims a battery life of 14 hours in the NOMAD Jukebox Zen, slightly higher than that of the iPod."

    Hmm, that's actually almost twice the 7.5 hours for the new iPod that I've heard reported.

    1. Re:Battery life... by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      the best part about the nomad line is that you actually do hit the rated battery life. i pull 12.5hrs on my firewire zen while its rated at 12. the guys over in creatives firmware department do their job and do it extremely well. the new beta firmware for the old jb1's has people hitting anywhere from 5-7hrs while its rated at 4. note: EAX does hurt battery life. when using EAX with a playlist of VBR MP3s each with an average of 3:30min playtime at a volume of 20 it drags battery life down to about 5 hours. also be aware that 20 on the zen is loud (goes up to 25!!). mose people dont use eax and dont turn the zen up to high levels so really it works out.

  158. Nomad Zen could be nirvana by ablair · · Score: 1

    Sounds impressive from the rumors. I sure hope Creative fixes the low background crackling sounds when playing audio files. It would kinda kill their l33t Aud1oph1le claims for the Zen if they don't fix it by this time around.

  159. Sorry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Integration & style. My new iPod has it.

    Keep your Gateways and your Nomads.

  160. Zen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DOesn't zen say not to get lots of stuff? Good one creative encourage people to get lots and lots of crap

  161. 60GB == 30GB by Josuah · · Score: 1

    The 60GB Nomad will hold the same number of songs as the 30GB iPod. If you consider that the Nomad must have 256Kbps MP3 for CD-quality, and the iPod must have 128Kbps AAC for CD-quality. (Standard disclaimer on the abilities of audiophiles.)

    So, given that, you're on equal footing as far as storage goes. Now you just have to decide if $100 is worth the other features of the iPod. e.g. size, UI, extras.

  162. MP4, MP3, CDDA and that's all you need by gig · · Score: 1

    There are only three (3) important music playback formats so far. MP4, MP3, and CDDA audio tracks. All the rest are a way, way, way distant fourth and really don't matter in 2003. This is speaking not from the perspective of someone who makes music players or hardware, but from the perspective of someone who makes music albums, so please consider humility if this isn't how Microsoft or Real or Creative explained music to you. The people who make the music are one step before the people who make the players in this process, because ultimately, what comes out of the tools we use to make music is MP4, MP3, and CDDA, just like iDVD spits out DVD Video discs. Step 2, you want a player to play them.

    (You will probably also want an MP4 and MP3 encoder for CDDA that you already own, but that is optional.)

    1) AAC audio track (2002 - present)
    - a.k.a. "MP4" or "MPEG-4" or "MPEG-4 Audio" or "DVD Audio"
    - 16-bit 44.1kHz stereo
    - lossy-compressed with Dolby AAC encoding
    - 128kbs is agreed to be "CD quality"
    - all MPEG-4 players respect the OPTIONAL "protected" flag which is set at encoding time and then not unset by players (you might think of unprotected MP4's as "files" and protected MP4's as "streams")

    2) MP3 audio track (1990's - present)
    - a.k.a. "MPEG-2 Audio Layer 3", "MP3 CD"
    - 16-bit 44.1kHz stereo
    - lossy-compressed with Fraunhofer MP3 encoding
    - 160kbs is agreed to be "CD quality"

    3) CDDA audio track (1980's - present)
    - early 1980's to present
    - a.k.a. "audio CD", "CD-DA", "Compact Disk Digital Audio", "AIFF"
    - 16-bit 44.1kHz stereo
    - uncompressed
    - the 20Hz to 20kHz frequency range, 90dB dynamic range and low noise defines "CD quality"

    THAT IS ALL. The others are superfluous. If you have MP4 in addition to MP3 in addition to CDDA in 2003 then that is like having vinyl, Compact Cassette and 8-track Cassette in your livingroom in 1982.

    The only solution that is up-to-date with all of this is Apple's Macs and iPods. In pro audio we work with 24-bit and 32-bit depths and super high sample rates and the Mac plays those because it's built for audio people. It makes sense Apple would have the playback stuff ready for MP4, MP3, CDDA before anyone else.

    The other audio formats you see out there exist not for technical reasons but instead for Licensing, Marketing, DRM, Legacy, or Future.

    Windows Media = Licensing, Marketing, DRM, legacy
    Real = Licensing, Marketing, DRM, legacy
    Ogg = Licensing, Marketing
    NVF = DRM

    Recording at 48kHz = DRM

    Playing 48kHz, 22kHz, 11kHz = Legacy
    Playing 4-bit, 8-bit, 20-bit = Legacy

    Playing 24-bit = Future
    Playing 96kHz = Future
    Play 5.1 or 7.1 Surround = Future

  163. To the man with the 10gb collection.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    20gb is enough.

    To the man with a 40gb music collection, 20gb is not enough.

    People aren't happy with having all of their music broken up into little pieces. They want everything at their fingertips, wherever they are. That is why people want big portable music devices. No CDs to bring with them, no disc swapping. For someone like me, who cycles for hours, there is no reason not to have many gigs of music with me.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  164. Re:I'll go for the cheaper one this time... by gig · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has an iPod knows that there have been numerous firmware updates for them. You might not notice because Mac OS X's Software Update downloads the iTunes update and then iTunes updates the iPod the next time they sync. It's very easy.

    The first and second generation iPods are now at firmware 1.3, which added MP4/AAC support.

    The third generation iPod is at 2.0. Yes, you can now make a playlist on your iPod if you buy a new one.

    iPod has always been paired with iTunes. It is so easy to make a bajillion playlists in iTunes that I never even thought of making one on the iPod before. You can make a smart playlist in iTunes and tell it "just songs from 1969 that are Blues and less than 10 minutes" and a 200 song playlist is made for you instantly and it is self-updating.

    The on-the-go playist is cool in the new iPod, but it is not the kind of feature that will have older iPod users complaining. We've been carrying around iPods for a year now. We have nothing to complain about.

  165. it's == its NT by scottgfx · · Score: 1

    it's == its

    --
    It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
  166. I guess I'm too late... by groman · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm too late, but something advocates from both sides tend to forget is that these things are largely a matter of taste. I personally, cannot use the iPod at all, because the way it naturally lays in my hand my thumb overreaches and I can't turn the wheel. It feels like a glass brick, and the LCD and control wheel are in the wrong place(they should switch them, LCD on the bottom, control wheel on the top).


    However, there aren't really that many MP3 players that are a lot better. My Nomad IIc is the most comfortable to hold, but it's mere flash so it is 128MB. The Jukebox is a monstrosity. Anybody know of an ergonomic harddrive based mp3 player that doesn't feel like it is a brick and is made for people with real sized thumbs?

  167. Re:DONT BUY AN IPOD!!!!!! by scottgfx · · Score: 1

    Well... I have an older iPod too. Does your iPod not do something that was advertised BEFORE you bought it?........ Well?......... That's what I thought.

    --
    It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
  168. Summary of at least 50 posts... by littleRedFriend · · Score: 1

    Ipod is soooo much better, bla bla bla, Apple rocks, bla bla bla. Creative sucks, bla bla bla
    That's my take. Hate to sound like a ravenous Mac-head, but... well... I am one.


    That is exactly the reason why I will *_never_ever_* buy an Ipod. I just don't want to even have a slight chance that I'll be mistaken for a totally devoted, 100% Apple-marketing-brainwashed, totally subjective Apple fanboy. This Apple is almost starting to be a religion, and is getting on my tits.

    Get a live, where your self image depends on the people that care about you and what you do, not about what kind of hardware manufacturer you sponsor!

    --
    IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    1. Re:Summary of at least 50 posts... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      I just don't want to even have a slight chance that I'll be mistaken for a totally devoted, 100% Apple-marketing-brainwashed, totally subjective Apple fanboy.

      Yeah, heaven forbid you like a product because its vastly superior to other options. Size is the killer app when it comes to mp3 players for many people, and while there are smaller players than the iPod, none of those come close to its capacity.

  169. WOW! Factor by Quila · · Score: 1

    This is the big difference. When people get MP3 players, the generally play with the features, think its cool and get on to listening to their music.

    For an example, when a coworker recently got an (older) iPod, the excitement was tangible -- "Wow!" "This is the shit!" "Check this out!" and so on for weeks. The design was so great, he just kept holding it and feeling it, cooing over it. He's gone now, but I'm sure he's still like that.

    The iPod gives you this, others don't.

  170. It's a Jihad on PC users :p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the problem.

    On /., most people seem to be Apple sluts, complete with the Imac blouse and G4 plaid skimpy skirt, with their hair in fucking pigtails

    That's fine. Let them go ahead and not play any games, etc. You pay for the style and being "unbound from chains," I suppose.

    If you are interested in Apple, you will go with Apple's product. It doesn't matter if there is nothing really special about it. It doesn't even matter if it is inferior. You will defend them like a zealot, as if the war between PCers and Mac users is some kind of Holy War, a Jihad, if you will, because while PC users realize "hey, it's a computer," Mac users seem to think that the Corporation they give their money to is sacred and holy.

    All praise be to All...er, Jobs. Right? ;)

  171. Gozilla Movie? by KidSock · · Score: 1

    If I didn't know any better I would think this post was about a gozilla movie.

  172. Line-out by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    One feature that both of these are missing is a Line-out connection. I got a Nomad Jukebox3 reciently one of the most useful features for me is the line-out. This means I can plug it into my stereo at home (Or indeed any stereo anywhere) and play my entire CD collection at random without ever having to change CDs.

    1. Re:Line-out by berniecase · · Score: 1

      A 1/8" minijack to RCA output works just fine on the iPod. Crank the volume to max, set equalizer to flat, and plug into stereo. Sounds great. I do it all the time.

    2. Re:Line-out by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      ya a 1/8" minijack to RCA output works just fine with the zen and ipod.

    3. Re:Line-out by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Well, not according to this happy user: http://www.nomadness.net/modules.php?op=modload&na me=Forums&file=viewtopic&topic=5503&forum= 9

  173. rant by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    I will be impressed when the newspapers blowing around on the street don't blow under a building, but pile up in corners for example.

    Would piling newspapers add anything to the plot? No. Gameplay? No. Replayability? No. Its just something that you look at and think "hmm, thats neat" for approximatly .00005 seconds, then ignore. Why should the programmers waste a week implementing your blowing newspaper physics, when they could spend that time improving the AI or other parts of the game that actually matter?

    My roomate is similarily misguided. He wants big environments like in GTA, but he wants to be able to blow a wall in any building and walk through it. Again its like playing with power windows in a car for the first time: its cool for the first couple minutes but after that its pointless.

    Somebody should make a game for you guys, where everything is highly interactive the enivornment is totally maleable. Of course your game would only have one (small) level, with no storyline, but then you could stop complaining that game xx doesn't have usless feature yy. But then this company would only sell about 50 copies to these few highly retentive people and go bankrupt. /end rant :)

    1. Re:rant by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's what polish is: stuff you see and think "hmm, that's neat". And a game which has none of this usually sucks.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:rant by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      There's another word for that kind of so called polish: feature creep, and it kills games. Rather than focusing on important things like the plot, level design, the gameplay (how well you move, interact with the environment, enemies etc) and the AI they get drug down into "hey this would be neat lets add it to the game".

      Feature creep killed Diakatana. Its kept Duke Nukem Forever in development for what five years now? Six? There's liking polish and then there's being anal retentive, and saying you wont be happy until somebody has acurate newspaper piling physics frimly falls into the latter.

    3. Re:rant by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Dude, feature creep made Ultima 7 the best RPG OF ALL TIME! The ability to fuck around by, for example, reaping wheat, grinding it into flour, and baking the flour into bread, and selling it was the most priceless feature U7 had! Similarly, the amount of spit shine on GTA:VC is what makes it glow! There is a difference between simple software bloat / poor code or architecture management and actual complicated but beautiful design.

  174. Sad. I don�t get it. by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Sad. This was my only question. I am looking for a MP3 Playing-Device that connects to my Linux Box as a mountable share. Everything else (third party software, alpha OS-Projects) is crap. Can it be that hard to build a device wich serves as an external disk?? I dont get it. (Same problem with cams btw.) Personally I think Ill spend the extra money for a well supported Ipod.

    cu,
    Lispy

    1. Re:Sad. I don�t get it. by barryf · · Score: 1

      The Archos Jukebox does exactly that. Just plug it in and mount it. Copy the files as you wish and off you go.

      -Barry

  175. Re:I'll go for the cheaper one this time... by afidel · · Score: 1

    Are you on crack!!! I am furious with Apple for not adding on the go playlist support to the 1.3 firmware and I am far from alone on the subject. Since 58% or iPods sold have been windows versions and the bundled software sucks (musicmatch is trash, the freeware ephpod is much better) it is really a feature we have been asking for since the iPod came out. Besides my music collection is very eclectic and what goes into my playlist varies with my mood, one day I might want Jazz and trance, the next rock and house, still another maybe all classical. Trust me Apple will have some very bad will with a lot of users if they don't backport the feature.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  176. portable hard-disk based players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll buy one when the manufacturers wise up to the rather simple point that a portable device capable of storing thousands of hours of music is NOT best served by a dedicated rechargeable battery with a few hours life..... It's simple, really.... I go on a trip with the gadget in my pocket.... all the music I'll ever need... then, five hours later, my battery's flat and I've got to go find some mains power to recharge... kinda dumb. Given the ubiquity and low cost of alkaline AAs, it needs to run on two of those... I can use rechargeables if I want then buy non-rechargeables when I'm on the road somewhere...

    this is why currently I take a minidisc player everywhere with me... with 12 hours battery life from a single AA you can't beat it.

  177. Yea, but by Lispy · · Score: 1

    its ugly ;-) But thanks for the hint anyways...

  178. Anyone know this one? by Lispy · · Score: 1

    It looks neat and claims to be mountable as a external storage device:
    Thomson Lyra PDP2820

  179. BUT I JUST WANT TO PLAY MP3'S!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need a handheld music player, address book, pocketknife, personal video recorder, juicer. I just want to play music with the damn thing. Which is why I have a Rio.

  180. Extra Features? by PaulGrimshaw · · Score: 1

    Now that the HDD size isnt so much of a feature (not like the old days anyhow) I hope that they will start branching into different addons, for example, a CompactFlash cardreader would be great to copy images from my Ixus to my ipod when out and about! Paul.

  181. Battery power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 10 gig iPod requires a recharge every 5 days, 10 hrs playback is great. Aside from the form factor etc. the 30GB version has a much higher battery consumption and I expect the 60 GB Nomad to suck even more battery power. First of all I can't understand the need to have a bigger capacity unless you're away from home or on the road constantly, and the prospect of yielding such a *huge* device which gives me a fraction of the playback time sucks. Go small and for longevity. 10GB is fine for a typical home user. Penis envy is bad.

  182. Huge decrease? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    You can theoretically obtain an almost infinitesimal decrease in audio quality when downsampling from 48->44.1.

    Problem is that the good resampling algorithms are computationally intensive, and hence are almost never implemented in hardware, instead less "costly" algorithms are used. But with good software (For the ultimate in flexibility, use Matlab - I kid you not. Lots of different resampling algorithms and documentation on how they work.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Huge decrease? by Black-Man · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the original statement that recording at 48 vs 44.1 for perceived 'quality' is a questionable undertaking, I also agree with what you say... products like Bias Peak offer sample rate conversion.

      Of course, only 'pro' or 'semi-pro' folks would probably have a copy of Peak.

    2. Re:Huge decrease? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also questionable is the fact that Creative's own SondBlaster Live! cards automatically upsample everything that goes in or out to 48kHz, and downsample it right back to whatever it was originally. The result isn't truly perceptable unless you have gear to compare it to, but it's still a rediculous fault, done in the name of 'quality'. Creative is just like that, I guess.

  183. Re:Well... false advetising about AC3/DTS decoding by SailorBob · · Score: 1
    I've been burnt by their false advertising. On their SoundBlaster Live! 5.1 they claim the card does AC3 and DTS decoding. So I took an old 166Mhz Pentium box, stuck in a DVD, an old real magic I had laying around and a SB Live! 5.1 in order to make a cheap multiregion DVD player. What happens when I pass off the AC3 stream from the real magic to the SB Live! 5.1? The movie starts skipping. So I start searching for answers over at their open source linux driver forum, and what do I find? The SB Live! 5.1 doesn't do AC3/DTS decoding. The decoding is done by the driver, completely in software!

    I had to upgrade the memory from EDO to PC66 SDRAMs and the CPU to a 233 in order to get the damn thing to play smoothly. Which kinda killed the whole idea of being able to build something cheap with an old puter.

    --

    Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

  184. AC-3, not AAC by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Dolby Digital is AC3, not AAC.

    That said, some DVD players may play it. But not all.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  185. Problem is... by Open_The_Box · · Score: 1

    ...that the integration of which you speak is all Mac based. And no, I'm not trying to start a flame war. You just don't (as far as I know, maybe someone out there with more recent knowledge can chip in) get the same integration from a Windows linked iPod. (I know nothing about the linux case but I'm guessing it's similar in lack-of-link)

    How much of the problem is the lack of a decent sync-ing script? Can we just write a small script to transfer files and update playlists? OK it may be fiddling about but for twice the storage and a lower cost (not to mention the fact that once you've done it properly the first time you don't have to do it again) I'd be prepared to make one or two compromises.

    Pay more for high quality, yes. But how much more quality do you get for your money? Is it right for the current hardware? Answers on a postcard...

    --
    If you can't think of something nice to say then don't say anything at all. No, REALLY.
  186. my take... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i must admit, i initially bought my ipod because of its impressive storage capacity and also damn good looks...

    but carrying 20 gig of music raound with you makes you realise, 20 gig is a lotta playtime, and i personally end up with a 'next song will be better and more like what i want to listen to' mentality... thus bumping through playlists and random shuffle modes like noting else...

    anyway, this leads to my opinion that the next big thing in portable music will not be storage capacity at all. more, sorting tracks using different criteria, in order for you to be able to do something like listen to the music you want to hear at the time you want. which was the origional justification for carrying a huge variety of audio....

    thus i assume apple has begun to see the same thing, and is takign the first steps towards it... with the star ratign system, which to me is very promising... cos im just to lazy to run up hunderds of my own playlists by hand.. tried moodlogic, and it actually did help a hell of a lot... but the ultimate to me is turning on my ipod, and havign an on the fly mood / tempo / genra based playlist created, and actually hearing a bunch of what i want to hear at the time, rather than trawlign through playlists or hoping for the best.

    anyway, i still think the ipod has something to it that makes it simply damn cooler than anyting else on the market.. and undercutting such a blatant luxury item in terms of price and storage capacity just wont pull any signifigant market share... competition will have to be able to compete with coolness factor.. and that will prove hard.

    anyway, my 2 cents. .R

  187. archos jukebox mulitmedia by GeekAvenger · · Score: 1

    prices start around 300. it only has 20 or 40 gigs, but it acts as a usb hard drive so it's totally drag and drop. it has 2 card reader modules, video/digital cam module, dvi module, and lcd screen. i play all my monty python and snl jeopardy vids, use it as storage, and of course mp3 player.

    1. Re:archos jukebox mulitmedia by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      ya but its the biggest of the zen/ipod/archos and has by far the longest boot time. up until the new ipods came out it had the lowest battery life (now both ipod and archos have 8hrs vs zens 14hrs). its got the lowest sound quality of the 3. and lastly the support is on par with what creative had back in the sblive days (aka pretty much nonexistant and sucks when you do talk to a person)

  188. 2100... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the 2100 (Didn't the Newtons get even larger over time, i.e. the 2100 is larger than the 120?), but the 120's handwriting recognition is indeed the shittiest HW recognition ever.

    We had a Newton MP120 in my house - It very quickly achieved "paperweight" status, even BEFORE it was replaced with a Palm Professional. It was a piece of shit, no ifs ands or buts. Slow, anemic, and bad handwriting recognition. A year later my dad got the aforementioned Palm Professional. No one in my family has gone back since then - At this point both of us carry Kyocera 6035s (Palm + CDMA phone) and I may be upgrading to a 7135 this summer. (Depends on if I can finagle an early phone upgrade, otherwise I have to wait an extra year for "new every two".)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:2100... by joshwa · · Score: 1

      As many have pointed out, the newer 2000/2100 2.x Newtons' HWR was the shiznat. Best, FASTEST HWR I've ever seen. I loved that bigger screen, too. With all the miniaturization these days, they could make a skinny light Newton these days for cheap, and (IMHO) make a killing.

  189. I have to agree by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Not sure about other Dells (I haven't had any problems with mine, but I'm careful with it. I will agree that the power connector is virtually invincible - Solid ABS plastic.), but if you look at the closest price/performance analog to Apple, which is IBM, IBMs are built MUCH more solidly than Apples, some of which look rather flimsy to me. IBM laptops are built like tanks. Pricey, though.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  190. Hidden cost of the iPod... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    The iPod costs a lot more... Because you'll start really loving your iPod, and wishing your computer behaved similarly. Then you go out and buy a Mac for $1k, and start liking it. Then you want it as your primary computer, and you end up with a Powerbook...

    Pretty soon that iPod cost you $5k... :)

    Alex

  191. Yeah... iTunes by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    Insert CD, on insert, iTunes rips mine at 192 AAC (replacing 192 MP3). Magically, there is a directory for each artist and each CD. I moved mine out of my home directory and into /Documents/Music, I don't really know why though.... It's automatic.

    What's great, is that sometimes CDDB has bad data... well I can mass change the CD's info. It's absolutely terrific.

    What's nice is that I don't "copy music" to my MP3 player. I have music on the road. I mean, I plug in my iPod.

    I have enough to worry about without worrying about my music. When I get CDs, I order from Amazon, and they come to the office. When the CD arrives, I pop it in, and iTunes rips it. I then make a copy of the CD w/ CD Text (via Toast). The copy goes in the Jukebox in the home stereo, and the original goes in a drawer with the other original CDs.

    Now I have it at home in the stereo, in the car, if I'm on the Subway, at the gym, and at the office. How does it get everywhere, the iPod plugs in.

    If something cheesy (heard from a friend or on FM/XM Radio), I can go buy the track for $1. No more scouring for music.

    I have music everywhere, and it doesn't take any time anymore. Go me!

    iTunes 4 is pretty slick, Rendezvous sharing is cool... Let me go see what the other guys at the office listen too...

    Alex

  192. Wait for this gadget: LYRA RD2780 from RCA/Thomson by rd_bbc · · Score: 1

    RCA LYRA RD2780

    - 20GB HD
    - 3,5" LCD
    - 5.2 x 3.14 x 0.98 inches
    - MP3, MP3PRO, WMA, MPEG4, JPEG
    - USB 2.0 or flash card
    - video in/out
    - 15 hours battery time
    - Available in summer 2003
    - $399 in suggested retail price

    Picture + specs

    Preview:

    Pressrelease from RCA

    Pressrelease from thomson

    pics

    The design is of course not at nice as with ipod, but still quite nice compared to archos. The screen is by far better than the one on ipod and is larger than the one on archos. I would go for this gadget because of the big screen and the overall design.

  193. Re: I beg to differ by falkor · · Score: 1

    I just remember a friend getting an 20 Gb iPod last Christmas. I keeps contantly crashing, or the playback freezes. That made me scratch iPod from my wishlist. They might look good, be small and portable. However, I would take the solid, a bit bigger Archos with Rockbox over the iPod anyday, when I see how bad his is. I might just have seen one unlucky case, but I hope Apple puts more pride in their workstations.

  194. just my 2 cents by bergito · · Score: 1

    i'm a machead, so i guess i'm biased. i considered the zen (old 20 gb model) before purchasing a new 30gb ipod last week. why? 1. size. it does matter, even when the ladies tell you it doesn't. one of my friends has a zen and it isn't that big. the ipod is just smaller, that's all. 2. storage capacity. yes, the zen wins on this one, no contest. i commend them for making twice the space available for 100$ less. this gives other companies something to strive for. for me, i wouldn't use 60 gigs. i have less than 20 gigs of music, and i don't see myself adding another 10 gigs before i buy a new mp3 player in a few years. more than 20 gigs was important to have available, which is why i went with the new 30 gb ipod. i can also boot from it as well. i don't know if the zen is cabable of this. 3. compatibility. itunes integration on a mac is better than any pc solution currently available. if you have a mac, the ipod is an easier choice. if you have a pc, i think it can go either way. apple will be releasing the pc version of itunes this summer. main point: i want to spend my time listening to the music, not fighting with software. 4. speed. firewire is fast. usb2 is fast. i can't say they are really all that different in terms of speed. in theory usb2 is faster. do i care? no. 5. ease of use. i've played around on both, the ipod feels much more intuitive. 6. aesthetic appeal. while looks are only skin deep, i do appreciate a sleek-looking device. it's not a big selling point, but is a factor nonetheless. the zen doesn't look bad at all. it reminds me a slightly elongated minidisc player. the different formats supported was never a factor for me. as long as the device plays mp3s, i'm happy. the idea of non-standard formats doesn't appeal to me, and i have yet to make up my mind about AAC. i'm not about to re-rip over 300 cds worth of music. DRM doesn't matter, i own all the cds my mp3s were ripped from. battery life is better on the zen. a 6 hours difference between the new ipod and the new zen is pretty hefty. 8 hours is enough for me though, i am never too far from a car, computer, or outlet. it also won't be very often that i'll listen to music for 8 hours straight, either. song management isn't that big of a deal to me. as long as the songs can be played, i have nothing to complain about. custom playlists on the go is a nice feature, but i see myself using the random/shuffle more often. price. ok, i paid a small fortune for my ipod. i think it's worth every penny. yes, the money is mine, and i work for it. i don't think a higher price means better, it just happens that the ipod is more expensive. which device is better? it's too subjective an argument to say one is undeniably better than the other. they both have their strengths and weaknesses. it's up the the consumer to decide what differences are more important, and get the the device that is best for them. i don't think the zen is a bad product, new or old. the introduction of the new zen will in the end benefit the consumer. with all the competition between the zen and ipod, the result can only be better devices.

  195. Zaurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sharp Zaurus can be used as an mp3/ogg player with tkcPlayer from theKompany.com

    An ibm microdrive makes this thing into a 1 gig music player. I'm patiently waiting for the 4 gig drives.

  196. PDAs with CISC chips by metamatic · · Score: 1
    Do they even make PDAs with CISC interface chips? I doubt it.


    There are these two companies called Palm and Handspring, you may have heard of them. They make a large number of PDAs using Motorola 68K processors. (Palm also now make a few with RISC chips.)
    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  197. flame retardant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how everytime someone criticizes an Apple product, he must first make it clear how much he loves his Apple products, lest he be deluged with flames.

  198. This kind of insane moron by flamingweasel · · Score: 1

    Because some of us have more than 10 CDs, and want to be able to carry our music -- all of our music -- with us. Because some of us don't encode all of our CDs to 128 kbps MP3. Because some of us have different needs than you.

    Of course, my first thought whenever I see those "BRING OUT TEH VIDEO IPOD!!1!!!" posts is, "What kind of insane moron wants to watch movies on a 3 inch screen?"

    --
    Cthulhu loves you.
  199. How Long Does an iPod Take To Open Video? by meehawl · · Score: 1
    On top of that the Archos is so, so ugly. And slow. It takes like 15 sec. to open a video clip.
    Dude, go try and open a *video* file on your iPod and, stay with me here, come back and tell us how long it took you.
    --

    Da Blog
  200. Oh, wow, cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, that sounds great! Soooo much better than the iPod. Does it come with iTunes?

    No?

    Oh...well then, nevermind.

  201. New Archos units are USB2 by meehawl · · Score: 1
    Do they have a firewire or USB 2 version
    All the newer Archos models from the past 12 months or so are USB2. No firewire.
    --

    Da Blog
  202. 128Kbps AAC Scores *last* on double-blind listen by meehawl · · Score: 1
    The 60GB Nomad will hold the same number of songs as the 30GB iPod. If you consider that the Nomad must have 256Kbps MP3 for CD-quality, and the iPod must have 128Kbps AAC for CD-quality.
    128Kbps AAC scores relatively lowest in listener perception here:
    http://www.infoanarchy.org/comments/2002/9/8/23472 /23921/0/post

    (I have no opinion about Oggs because I have not listened to them enough)

    It seems to me that the only purpose of pushing AAC onto the iPod is to deploy Anti Sharing Technology (DRM) and create a new revenue stream for Apple. I think I'll stick with my open-source Lame VBR MP3s...

    "--nspsytune --vbr-mtrh -V1 -mj -h -b96 --lowpass 19.5 --athtype 3 --ns-sfb21 2 -Z --scale 0.98 -X0" is my personal route to listening nirvana. I get an average bitrate of around 170Kbps and an *amazing* sound fidelity.
    --

    Da Blog
  203. Why it's impossible to support Ogg in some players by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I wonder why manufacturers aren't including OGG support in their players?

    Some MP3 player manufacturers (not Apple) use a 1 MHz 8-bit microcontroller to run the display and a decoder chip that takes an MPEG audio bitstream on one pin and produces a WAV bitstream on another. Thus, the device is capable of decoding MP2 and MP3 and nothing else.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  204. Transiatory? by ihatewinXP · · Score: 1

    it lets you burn to cd. a cd that you can then rip to ogg if thats your bag.

    whats the problem?

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
  205. MJ's Tagging Editor by meehawl · · Score: 1
    I have not used iTunes or an iPod before. I do not understand how easy it would be to set the tags on lots of untagged files.
    Go here, download the Media Jukebox, play with its superlative Tagging Editor. It doesn't get much better than this.
    --

    Da Blog
  206. Re:128Kbps AAC Scores *last* on double-blind liste by Josuah · · Score: 1

    Here's the official MPEG-2 AAC quality report: http://www.tnt.uni-hannover.de/project/mpeg/audio/ public/w2006.html. MPEG-4 AAC is based on MPEG-2 AAC (but admitedly different) with what is claimed to be a 30% improvement.

    Also, the survey you link to makes this note: "The perceived differences at 128 kbps were already very small." In other words, at 128kbps, the ranking they give could be statistically insignificant. We don't see any numbers, and it's noted at the end of the article that the c't report is not available online. We also don't see any specifics as to where the quality deviated. Or as to the test setup, the audio samples (self-selected? please), etc.

    I am also very skeptical of this ranking, which places 128kbps MP3 above 128kbps AAC and at the same time says that the difference was very small. Maybe this works since the listeners did not actually listen for deviations from the original, just their overall impression. I also think I remember reading that WMA "improved" perceived quality by adjusting the volume, because typical listeners associate that with a better sound. That does not mean it encoded with high fidelity.

    Now, ranking based on overall impression is fine, since that's what you want to optimize for anyway. But fidelity is also very important.

  207. Re:I switched Tsarkon Reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs took a 90 million dollar Jet and fucked over AAPL shareholders. Dont feel bad. If they can pay Jobs to fly on a Jet they bought him, they can fix a fucking broken Apple.

    Apple pays Jobs for use of jet the company bought him
    By Jon Fortt
    Mercury News

    Apple Computer has paid Chief Executive Steve Jobs more than $1.2 million for the use of a Gulfstream V jet it bought for him two years ago. Apple paid nearly $90 million for the jet, taxes and its delivery.

    Apple reported it paid Jobs $84,000 during the last fiscal quarter for company use of his private jet. The disclosure was made in Apple's quarterly report filed with the Securities Exchange Commission and made public Monday.

    Before last quarter's reimbursement, Apple said it had paid Jobs $1.16 million for his use of the jet since Jobs received it in May 2001. Jobs continues to draw a salary of $1. Apple declined to comment on the latest reimbursement. In the past, the company has said the plane saves Apple time and money.

    The quarterly report also said Apple's $24 million first-quarter restructuring effort included layoffs of 260 workers worldwide, less than 3 percent of the workforce.

    Apple said it is moving ahead with product development efforts and continues to hire engineers. The company announced Monday two new Xserve server products. The Xserve rack-mounted server, which Apple introduced last year, now has faster single or dual 1.33-gigahertz processors and a 167-megahertz system bus. The base price has dropped $200 to $2,799. The Xserve RAID storage product, which is arriving a couple of months behind schedule, offers 720 gigabytes of storage for $5,999, up to 2.5 terabytes for 10,999.

    Apple said that while Xserve RAID is designed to work with any server, it expects to sell them only to customers who already own Xserve. Apple expects video professionals, especially those dealing with high-definition footage, to be the ideal customers.

  208. Re:I'll go for the cheaper one this time... by twinkyminator · · Score: 1

    I still think ipod isn't as good as Zen/other creative jukeboxes, because there are two diffrent versions, one for mac and one for pc (am I right on this one?) and that sucks.

    Oh, and btw, my friend got a creative jukeboxwhatever and it got a really nice interface and so on. I'd choose Zen.