Slashdot Mirror


MSN Messenger Kickbans Third-Party IM Clients

No_Weak_Heart writes "As reported here back in August, October 15th is the day Microsoft set to ban third party clients from logging in to their IM service. This eWeek article notes that the day is upon us, and MS is offering few details about its progress in creating licensing agreements to continue access. The licensing issue was previously discussed here. And my copy of Fire cannot log in. Anyone else find their IM clients non-responsive?"

422 comments

  1. Trillian seems ok by Stripes007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    My trillian .74F seems to be responsive

    --
    Stripes: Because stars are overrated
    1. Re:Trillian seems ok by mubar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I second that. Currently the upgraded Trillian Basic 0.74 F works just fine.

    2. Re:Trillian seems ok by Inda · · Score: 1

      Try loggin off then back on again. 0.74 stopped working for me last night after a reboot.

      Pro 2.0 works great-ish. The skin I use didn't transfer very well (big crash) and some of my alerts were not remembered.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:Trillian seems ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trillian Pro 2.0 seems to work fine as well.

    4. Re:Trillian seems ok by MikeDX · · Score: 1

      Cool, I'll use that then. my copy of MSN Messenger 6.0 seems completely unable to login at all!

    5. Re:Trillian seems ok by 3th3rn3t · · Score: 1

      Yup, Trillian o.74E works fine as well, currently in the UK and logs on to baym-cs207.msgr.hotmail.com with no problems.

    6. Re:Trillian seems ok by ex0teric · · Score: 1

      My Trillian (.74F) works fine, even after a reboot.

    7. Re:Trillian seems ok by milou · · Score: 1

      I'm using version .74 with Patch F and it is working better than ever.

  2. Trillian works with latest update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trillian works with the latest update ... 0.74 or something ..

    couldnt log in at first, but now it works :)

  3. Trillian works fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trillian works fine. I'm talking to someone right now.

    1. Re:Trillian works fine by royles · · Score: 1

      Trillian v0.74 PatchD - not working!

      Error

      *** Reconnecting to MSN as "croyles@hotmail.com".
      *** Will attempt 10 connections with 60 second intervals.
      *** Connecting to MSN as "croyles@hotmail.com", attempt #1.
      *** Lost connection to server. Err 0:0

    2. Re:Trillian works fine by suman28 · · Score: 1

      That's because you need to upgrade to 0.74 patch E for MSN 0.74 patch F for yahoo. Otherwise, you are out of luck anyway.

  4. aMSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    new aMSN version works fine!
    amsn.sf.net

    Cheers.

    1. Re:aMSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I was using GAIM. Protocol failed. Downloaded latest CVS version. Still no dice.

      Downloaded aMSN for the first time. Works perfect.

    2. Re:aMSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are doing something wrong... aMSN is ugly ... if gaim's MSN plugin doesn't work you probably forgot to compile SSL support either through NSS or gnutls... ./configure --help shows you all the options

    3. Re:aMSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, updated my AMSN from .81 to .83, works great, stuff MS stupid bastards

    4. Re:aMSN by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      yep, works perfectly, and even downloads the required SSL library if needed automatically, aMSN is just about the best there is :)

    5. Re:aMSN by alok_naik · · Score: 2, Informative

      aMSN rocks ! Pretty much platform independent and no compiling required. I was using it on Solaris earlier and now on FreeBSD.

      --
      Every time I think I've hit the bottom, someone lends me a shovel.
  5. Gaim... by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

    Seems to be running OK at the moment..

    1. Re:Gaim... by admbws · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have just tried gaim. Disconnects immediately with the error, 'Protocol not supported'.

    2. Re:Gaim... by sniggly · · Score: 1

      I'm still logged in through gaim..and was able to communicate with a friends just now.. not sure what will happen if I reconnect and at this time not willing to try either :)

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    3. Re:Gaim... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      GAIM v0.70 works fine. (yey, my Linux box is still on MSN!, Mwahaha :-)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    4. Re:Gaim... by noselasd · · Score: 1

      I logged in 1 hour ago. No problem (gaim 0.70)

    5. Re:Gaim... by Stween · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're probably running an old version of Gaim if you're getting that message.

      MSN Protocol v9 has been supported for a version or two now.

      I just tried my Gaim 0.70 here (haven't updated to 0.71 yet), and it works perfectly. And it's quite definately not the 15th any more :)

    6. Re:Gaim... by revmoo · · Score: 1

      I have just tried gaim. Disconnects immediately with the error, 'Protocol not supported'.

      Strange, I'm currently logged into msn using gaim v.0.96 on Windows...

      --
      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
    7. Re:Gaim... by UndercoverParrothead · · Score: 1

      It's working on 0.71 as well. Not that I have anybody else using MSN logged in right now, but I'm able to log in just fine. And you're right, it's definitely not the 15th.

      --
      Don't mind me; I'm just a karma whore.
    8. Re:Gaim... by Janne+Oksanen · · Score: 1

      I'm running Gaim v0.70 and at least mine isn't logging in any more. I have to try if msn messenger will run under wine or talk my friends into using something else...

    9. Re:Gaim... by mrjb · · Score: 2, Informative

      tried installing 0.71 and got an error 'Protocol MSN failed to load." -- This can be fixed by installing SSL support first, THEN running ./configure, make and make install. SSL support reportedly can be installed with apt-get install gnutls7-dev, good luck all!

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    10. Re:Gaim... by mrjb · · Score: 1

      While I'm at it, I did an apt-get install mozilla-nss, this was found by configure but make still complained about not finding header files. if you copy these to the src/plugins/ssl directory, the compile continues fine.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    11. Re:Gaim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my gaim wont connect... darn microsoft! so much for open source

    12. Re:Gaim... by UndercoverParrothead · · Score: 1

      Did you install it with the mozilla-nss package or gnutls? If not then you don't have SSL support and which would explain why you can't login... The other option would be to try 0.71 - and make sure you have one of those two packages installed.

      --
      Don't mind me; I'm just a karma whore.
    13. Re:Gaim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll have to update GAIM to 0.71, 0.69 will probably not work on MSN any more...
      Gaim 0.71 works nice here on my gentoo linux box...

    14. Re:Gaim... by IA-Outdoors · · Score: 1

      v.70 wouldn't work for me. Upgraded to .71 and it worked fine. I believe the reports that .70 works but I don't have an explanation as to why it wouldn't for me and why .71 did.

      --
      You never saw a fish on the wall with its mouth shut.
    15. Re:Gaim... by craigdolson · · Score: 1

      Newest Gaim - "Protocol Not Supported" Screw them anyways.. I'll just stick to yahoo, aim, and IRC.

    16. Re:Gaim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same trouble, but rebuilding the latest version eventually fixed the problem. However, I had build errors first time around. (I'm using Slack 9.1.)

      To fix the issue, I had to add /usr/lib/mozilla-1.4 to my /etc/ld.so.conf and then run ldconfig as root.

    17. Re:Gaim... by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

      You're using 0.71? It works fine for me on Win32 with version 0.70. Since MSN Protocol Version 9 was added in in 0.69, it should work fine in version after that, *including* 0.71.

    18. Re:Gaim... by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      I had troubles last night with gaim (0.71). I couldn't connect to the MSN server, however I didn't get a "Protocol not supported" message like some other people have reported. Hopefully it's just a temporary thing. I'm at work now so I can't check it right now.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    19. Re:Gaim... by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Upgrade to 0.71. That's what my wife and I did and we are able to logon and use MSN just fine.

      Nevertheless, start prepping your contacts to install Yahoo or ICQ or Jabber so that if/when Microsoft decides that it they don't want 3rd party apps on the network that you have something to fall back on. All my contacts and I are slowly migrating to ICQ as our standard. I'd go to Yahoo (because creating an account is just a matter of creating a Yahoo email address) but since Yahoo basically did the same thing a couple weeks ago we decided ICQ would be a safer long-term bet.

    20. Re:Gaim... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I'm using Gaim 0.71. I just signed off, then back on. I'm chatting with my MSN buddies right now, no troubles at all.

    21. Re:Gaim... by Eric+Pierce · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I just compiled Gaim 7.1 and I had the openssl and openssl-devel rpms installed. Is this the wrong implementation of ssl? Or maybe the version isn't up to snuff... (It's 0.9.6) Eric Pierce

  6. Fortunately... by Felis+Rex · · Score: 1

    gAIM 0.71_4 is still working fine. I just chatted with a friend on it a few hours ago.

    --
    "it's only after disaster that you can be born resurected" - My friend Dave
    1. Re:Fortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, about gaim, only gaim 0.71 with built in encryption is working. You may use mozilla-nss (among other ... goto the gaim page for more) to do this, and after that, everything should be fine. (I still had to recompile gaim, and download all this software, which took me a lot of time)

      amsn also works, but it's limited to msn ...

      according to their site, kopete (.kde.org) should also work.

    2. Re:Fortunately... by Felis+Rex · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. I am using gaim 0.71_4, and to the best of my knowledge, encryption has not been compiled in. I never passed that option at compile time. It worked fine, and still does. Maybe FreeBSD just rocks more than I thought. :)

      --
      "it's only after disaster that you can be born resurected" - My friend Dave
  7. trillian works just fine by jark · · Score: 1

    trillian pro 2.0 logs in to msn just fine and without issue. i did not see them mention in the article yet their client works fine. doesn't look like *all third-party clients* have been kicked.

    1. Re:trillian works just fine by moojj · · Score: 1

      From what I read on the trillian site over the last few weeks, Trillan Pro 2.0 emulates the MSN6 protocol rather than the normal Trillian versions who emulate the basics of the old MSN protocol. (I could be wrong though). Also, A friend of mine told me there were patches you can get for trillian to upgrade the procotol for msn6 support.

    2. Re:trillian works just fine by typobox43 · · Score: 1

      Yep, Trillian 2.0 came with MSNP9 (the MSN6 protocol) support built in. There are now patches for Trillian .74 and Trillian 1.0 to add this support.

  8. Just upgrade by colinleroy · · Score: 2

    Ayttm (shameless plug) works. So does Gaim (AFAIK) (ok, it's here...) and most major open-source MSN clients (since a few weeks at least, they use the new protocol). The ban isn't really a ban, that's really mainly a security improvement.

    --
    blah
    1. Re:Just upgrade by Fembot · · Score: 1

      How is being forced to use SSL instead of MD5 + Random string any more secure?

    2. Re:Just upgrade by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's worse is it doesn't use SSL beyond the first couple of packets... I wrote a proxy for MSN6 (needed to block file transfers through the firewall) and was amazed to find that after the initial SSL negotiation to establish identity, the entire protocol is still plaintext... certainly made writing the proxy easier :)

    3. Re:Just upgrade by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      Because one can check the certificate ?

      --
      blah
    4. Re:Just upgrade by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Because it is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack. An attacker can monitor communications: he can capture the random string sent by the MSN server, he can capture the response string sent by the client, and can use that information to try and crack the password in a reasonable period of time (there was an article a few months back about a group who managed to brute force MD5 hashes in a very short period of time; don't remember the exact interval, but it was well less than an hour).

      SSL uses a shared secret to enchange information, and is not vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack.

    5. Re:Just upgrade by Fembot · · Score: 1

      By that logic though its not infeasable for me to work out the private part of the server's SSL certificate then and do the exact same thing. Except this time I recive the password in clear text instead.

    6. Re:Just upgrade by Fembot · · Score: 1

      I Can fake the certificate just as easily as I can crack the MD5 hash of my password + Random chars though

    7. Re:Just upgrade by Keeper · · Score: 1

      If you can figure out the private part of the server's SSL certificate based on the public keys exchanged between the two machines in a reasonable period of time, SSL is broken.

      To date, I haven't seen such a claim made.

    8. Re:Just upgrade by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      No, you can't. If the client checks it, it'll output a big warning.

      --
      blah
  9. Too many paedophiles by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    Weren't they trying to keep paedophiles out with enhanced "security" measures? How do they know only paedophiles don't use windows? Possibly the same "security" measures as Xbox mods and Xbox live.....

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Too many paedophiles by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      This is not about msn chatrooms, this is about msn IM.

      --
      blah
    2. Re:Too many paedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was aired on several news stations in Toronto that this was MSN trying to please the police's goal of preventing paedophiles from exchanging info and images online as well as meeting up with children.

    3. Re:Too many paedophiles by machinegunben · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the press in Toronto is stupid.

      --
      I'm going to create my own nerd website, with blackjack.. and hookers.. In fact, forget the site
    4. Re:Too many paedophiles by muzthe42nd · · Score: 1

      Ahh, no. Same across the pond in blighty. What Microsoft were on about was that they are shutting down the MSN chatrooms in all countries, except the US, where they'll be moderated. At least, that's how I remember it.

      --
      Pfft - Sorry, what?
  10. Alviro's MSN by krumms · · Score: 1

    GAIM stopped working for me, so I downloaded AMSN - and it works brilliantly. Kinda scary how similar it looks to the original MSNM client!

    But yeah, if you're experiencing problems with GAIM, maybe try your luck with AMSN.

    1. Re:Alviro's MSN by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      The latest versions of both Gaim and aMSN work, because they support version 9 of the MSN protocol. Any clients that do not support this version of the protocol can no longer log in - clients that do, can.

      For now, it seems to be that simple.

    2. Re:Alviro's MSN by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      I am not sure whether you actually prefer AMSN to gaim (in which case keep it and ignore the rest of my message), but if you were to upgrade GAIM to the latest version (0.71 AFAIK) it would all work fine and dandy

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    3. Re:Alviro's MSN by Fromunda_Cheese · · Score: 1

      My GAIM 7.1 doesn't work for MSN. It says "protocol not supported" .. I am downloading AMSN and Ayttm to test those out.

      --
      Jesus did it for the chicks.
    4. Re:Alviro's MSN by TunaPhish · · Score: 1

      you need the mozilla-nss or the gnutls package for it to work properly.

      you can ask questions in #gaim on irc.freenode.net if you still have problems.

    5. Re:Alviro's MSN by minaguib · · Score: 1

      AMSN is great, but look at the footprint, it's a memory pig.

    6. Re:Alviro's MSN by lintux · · Score: 0

      Ah, so even that part of the original MS client is simulated correctly.

  11. strange by Down8 · · Score: 1

    As mentioned, Trillian 0.74f works fine... with MSN, but I'm having problems getting onto AIM with it. Weird.

    -bZj

    --
    .sig
  12. The obvious question is by gunix · · Score: 1

    how can I set up a jabber server for me and a selected group of people?
    I wouldn't imagine that the situation will get any better.

    --
    Evolution of Language Through The Ages: 6000 BC : ungh, grrf, booga 2000 AD : grep, awk, sed
    1. Re:The obvious question is by sniggly · · Score: 1

      see http://www.jabber.org - they have the server & some pretty ok documentation avail on their site. You can also create an account there and on several other public servers.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    2. Re:The obvious question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the open source jabberd server at Uni so my friends and I can talk to eachother. It's really very easy to setup and I stopped it from being able to talk to the outside world (Jabber allows this), so it's purely an intranet thing.

      IMO, Jabber totally rocks... Jabber 2.0 will hopefully address any flaws in the current Jabber.

  13. Gaim v0.66 kicked by x-router · · Score: 1
    Went to login this morning via gaim.......

    Disconnected:

    Protocol not supported

    pld microsoft, I'll just have to get all my freinds using icq.

    1. Re:Gaim v0.66 kicked by Stween · · Score: 1

      That's because your version of Gaim doesn't support MSN Protocol version 9.

      Upgrade.

  14. Apparently they were overzealous by Klerck · · Score: 1

    My Pocket PC based PDA is unable to log on with the actual MSN messenger client. I've been hearing the same from a few others.

    I guess that's a pretty big oops!

    1. Re:Apparently they were overzealous by Froggert · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's an update, but it hasn't been publicized very well. Look at the FAQ and download pages to get an updated client. HTH

      --
      What, me worry?
  15. IM now ... Mono Later ?? by MadX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this not just a taste of things to come ??
    Lock users into your service .. then force them to use your product exclusively ??

    Don't know about anyone else .. but alarm bells should be sounding for other projects as M$ pull all their stuff closer to their chest ..

    1. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by danheskett · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lock users into your service .. then force them to use your product exclusively ??

      How can you blame them? MS provides the hardware, the bandwidth, and the assumes the risk of operating this chat network. I like my 3rd party client, but you know what? I leach from MS by using it. They have every right to restrict who can use their network and how. If they want to use technological measures to limit who can access the network, than fine, so be it. I'll use their product or a competeting protocol.

      The main difference between this an Mono and inference is that letting 3rd party clients onto the MSN network costs MS real cash dollars each time a message is sent or received.

      As long as IM service is free but centrlised, providers will try to lock out non-offical clients through whatever means are necessary.

    2. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by kauschovar · · Score: 1

      Is this not just a taste of things to come ??

      I say no, there's nothing new about this. Remember activation with Windows XP? It wasn't all that long ago... This has always been how Microsoft operates. They lock the world, not just users, into their products (Windows, MS Office, MSN), then when they feel they have enough market dominance they force it upon users who find ways around using/buying their products. Activation is one example. And not all that long ago /. reported MS incorporating DRM into the next version of MS Office. This is where locking the world into their products comes into play. Sure, you don't have to use the next version of MS Office, but then you might not be able to read documents from the web because other users are locked into it. And sure, you don't have to use MSN Messenger, but then you might not be able to comunicate with some buddies. For now it seems MSN Messenger is free, but don't be surprised if MS gradually starts to encorporate fees into MSN Messenger. So yeah, taste of things to come (DRM in Office) as well as a blast from the past (activation).

    3. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by MythMoth · · Score: 1

      I can blame them.

      I purchased Office X for OSX, and it comes with MSN Messenger. I could download the "free" version, but since I access the internet over GPRS on my mobile phone that actually works out considerably less than "free" for me.

      One pissed off customer.

      D.

      --
      --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
    4. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by Seahawk · · Score: 1

      Why not let people pay for the service then?

      And let me answer that myself:

      Because that would prohibit them from using their monopoly on the desktop market to gain any marketshare in the IM market.

      People should pay for the products they use - no more, no less.

      As long as you try to abuse a dominant position like this, you will have people "leeching" on your network.

      TBH - I fail to see the problem...

    5. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "letting 3rd party clients onto the MSN network costs MS real cash dollars each time a message is sent or received."

      Bullshit. A server uses electricity when it's turned on. It doesn't matter if a message is sent or not, it still uses the same amount of electricity.

    6. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by EddWo · · Score: 1

      Bandwidth bills?
      Probably a drop in the ocean compared to all the traffic microsoft.com gets. But they must be paying someone somewhere for all that traffic. Each new message adds something to the total.

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    7. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by Barnoid · · Score: 1

      >>letting 3rd party clients onto the MSN network costs MS real
      >>cash dollars each time a message is sent or received."

      >Bullshit. A server uses electricity when it's turned on.
      >It doesn't matter if a message is sent or not, it still uses >the same amount of electricity.

      also bullshit. the server uses less energy if it sits in is idle loop doing HALT.

      but that's not the point. the servers have to be bought, replaced and administered. if there are more people on the network, they'll need more or bigger servers.

      yet the biggest cost probably comes from the bandwith used by sending a message. and don't tell me the server uses the same bandwith whether it forwards a message or not.

    8. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      How can you blame them? MS provides the hardware, the bandwidth, and the assumes the risk of operating this chat network. I like my 3rd party client, but you know what? I leach from MS by using it. They have every right to restrict who can use their network and how. If they want to use technological measures to limit who can access the network, than fine, so be it. I'll use their product or a competeting protocol.
      This would be all very sane and true, were not Microsoft price dumping their entrance into the IM market. No, they are not alone in this nonsense. However, couple the price dumping with the ubiquitous presence of MSN on every windows desktop, and my sense of unfair competition is sounding an alarm. Now, when, in the future, Microsoft decides to lock out people (today was just a protocol change, no lock out happened), I'll feel more competent players for this position were kept out of the market by Microsoft's iron hand on the desktop and immensely deep pockets.
      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    9. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's a flawed argument. Exactly how does it cost MS more money if you connect to them using trillian instead of msn messenger? The only thing you could sort of, kind of, argue is that messenger displays ads and trillian (pro) doesn't. But the mac version doesn't either, so are mac msn users in the wrong too then?

      When I use MSN in windows, I see the ads, but I never ever click them or buy a product from the sites they mention. Am I a freeloader too? Should I uninstall MSN?

      The reality is that MSN is a free network, with public access. Sure, it's not documented well, but it's documented well enough to be able to build chatclients for the MSN network.

      Let's make a hypothetical case of another network service, http. How would you feel if amazon made a deal with MS and started locking out everyone using anything but IE. Would that be fair too? Would that be "alright"? And if that's acceptable, what if MS made more of those deals, and gradually you (I mean you as replacement for alternative browser user) would be locked out by CNN, ebay, yahoo, google, and various other core webservices. Would that be OK too? I guess so, because since they are private enterprises they can do WHATEVER they want, right? And after all, it's not like they have a monopoly in their respective markets, so...

    10. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by ignatus · · Score: 1

      first of all, they could have provided msn with a decent protocol.It needs 3 servers for god's sake.Part of their overload is their own fault. second, as msn-messenger beeing part of winblows and thus used by virtually every nitwit user (like 90 % of their users), allmost everybody uses the msn-messenger. The third-party client have only a small share of the users. If there is an overload, you can't fully blame the third-party users, because they don't use a significant part of the broadband. thirly, i guess that running zwindows servers causes an overload anyway :)

      --
      - Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
    11. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by jvervloet · · Score: 1
      How can you blame them? MS provides the hardware, the bandwidth, and the assumes the risk of operating this chat network.

      I don't blame Microsoft for locking out 3rd party clients. But I do have problems with the way they `trap' users in their closed network.

      MSN Messenger is installed on almost every new computer running Microsoft Windows (My Windows Update calls it an update to the operating system, but I didn't install it). Once installed, there is no trivial way to remove it. And if it is there, why should someone use anything else?

      Windows users are almost forced into MSN, and locking out 3rd party clients is locking out Linux/Unix users from the I.M. network that almost everybody uses. (The majority of the PC users runs MS Windows.)

      I think that if Microsoft closes its network, it should clearly display this information when a new user registers (I doubt it does). Even better, there should be pointers to open IM networks for those who want to be able to communicate with `non-MSN people'.

      (Disclaimer: I do realize this will never happen ;-))

    12. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      If you're chatting all day on MSN over GPRS complaining about a new version is moot. Go to a friend's house and bogart their cable modem for a couple minutes.

      I was mad I had to use the non-Office v.X Messenger as well. It looks and acts much nicer than their new version. Regardless with Wi-Fi hotspots, friends with broadband, and connected phone jacks you ought to be able to find some method of downloading Messenger other than via GPRS.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    13. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by weinrich · · Score: 1

      How can you blame them?

      Because they are Microsoft, and this is /.

      --
      Error: .sig not found, using /etc/passwd instead
    14. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by lonb · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how to rate your reply as good (I'm new), but I would. You are absolutely right. Microsoft has decided that Messenger will be a critical component of their office suite, and are therefore including it (and even requiring it in future versions for many functions).

      This is exactly what we went through with the inclusion of IE. Although the courts are too naive (technologically) to understand this, it was a GOOD thing that a browser was available for free with Windows. However, it was a BAD thing that users were forced to use IE and not select any browser they want. The situation is terrible for the technical sector because Microsoft, whether a monopoly or not, has tremendous power, and obvious control of the market. They should not be allowed to force computer users to choose any application-level software simply because of either the OS or other application-level software.

      And to those who are discussing the cost of messenger service, and microsoft's right to charge for this service... Microsoft has a right to charge for any service it wants. However, it does not have the right to force you into paying for a service by abusing its size and power. If Microsoft uses illegal activities such as monopolistic controls (like building an environment where the masses have to use messenger) then it should be stopped and punished.

      - Lon

      p.s. I run Trillian Pro 2.0, and MSN is working fine today.

      --
      "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
    15. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USE JABBER

    16. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by luisdom · · Score: 1

      For the 6731th time again: Microsoft is a monopoly and using that monopoly to kick other companies in other markets is illegal. Offering messenger "for free" for a time and then, when you have the market for you, "charge" for it is illegal.
      Prepare yourself for the same shit with mail, is not so far away...

    17. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      force you into paying for a service

      Woah.. who is forcing anyone to pay for using MSN Messenger/Windows Messenger?

      No one. It is included with office. Okay. Great. Hoow does that force you to use it?

    18. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by lonb · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't mean to make it sound like they are currently making you pay -- I was speaking in the hypothetical. However, Microsoft is currently trying to force you to use only their client, which is close, and certainly a step in the direction they want.

      --
      "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
    19. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      People should pay for the products they use - no more, no less.
      Well then.. I guess you are against free software and non-commerical software, since everyone has to pay...

      This is not abuse in any way. This a competeting product - there are numerous alternatives out there. Additionally, MS has created mechanisms so that their service can be integrated into 3rd party products (but still using the core MS libraries to perform the communications, logins, etc).

      Again, how you can call them abusive on this is just beyond the pale...

    20. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Exactly how does it cost MS more money if you connect to them using trillian instead of msn messenger?
      IT doesn't. However, it does cost them money. They provide the capital, and therefore, they can set terms and conditions as they see fit.

      The reality is that MSN is a free network, with public access
      MS says there is no public access. Those are there terms and conditions. That's the whole point. Let me give you a though experiment. If I can gain access to your home network, and I allowed to use its resources? I mean, sure its not documented and you dont want people using it, but its fairly straight forward to take control of the network. I mean, if I can write software that makes it possible isn't that the end of the issue?

      If Amazon and MS made a deal for exclusive access, that'd be of course fine. IE is not a monopoly by any means. There are more and growing alternative browsers. On top of that, Amazon is not a monopoly in web retailing. Asking that question is like asking if myself and Joe Bob's Hardware store are allowed to create an exclusive contract. Of course we are. Just because MS has a monopoly on *desktop* OS's (which has slipped since the ruling, of course) and Amazon is popular doesnt make that contract null. Same for ebay - there are plenty of competitors to ebay. Same for CNN, google, and other. Just because its popular doesn't mean it is "core" or "a public service". These are private businesses. They are allowed to make agreements they want.

      So yes, in regards to exclusive access, discounts, or anything.. yes.. so long as they are not *the provider* of that service they have the widest latitude in deciding how to run their business...

    21. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      If I can access your home PC because you designed the security or use bad unpatched software does that mean it is okay for me to take over your PC and use against your will?

    22. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      For the 6732th time:

      MS HAS A MONOPOLY ON DESKTOP OPERATING SYSTEMS

      That doesnt not mean they have a monopoly in anthing else. MS closing its network off to 3rd party clients DOES NOT PREVENT THOSE OTHER PEOPLE FROM CREATING THEIR OWN IM NETWORK. Additionally, MS publishes a public API for integrating IM products into Windows just like Windows Messenger.

      Additionally, MS is NOT CHARGING FOR IT. They could, but they aren't.

    23. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes as much sense as the phone company denying you service because you want to use a phone from Wal-Mart instead of renting one of theirs.

    24. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by luisdom · · Score: 1

      MS HAS A MONOPOLY ON DESKTOP OPERATING SYSTEMS. That doesnt not mean they have a monopoly in anthing else.
      Exactly, and it uses that monopoly to drive other companies in other markets out of business.

      MS closing its network off to 3rd party clients DOES NOT PREVENT THOSE OTHER PEOPLE FROM CREATING THEIR OWN IM NETWORK.
      Yeah, like saying: "AT&T has a monopoly on telecom market, but that doesn't prevent other companies from creating their own telephone system, that won't, of course, work with AT&T's one". If MS would define a way for other systems to communicate with messnger, there would be no complain. See? room for competition, everyone is happy. Now ask yourself: is that much to ask for? (hint: MS was asking for that when yahoo (or it was ICQ?) had the monopoly on IM).

      Additionally, MS is NOT CHARGING FOR IT. They could, but they aren't.
      They are, showing ads is a way of charging, but that's why I said "charge" and not charge.

    25. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      And each user--whether using their client or not--is one more reason for other users to use MSN Messenger. I'm "paying" Microsoft by using their network which increases their userbase by 1 which makes their network more valuable since more people will use it so they can talk to me.

      If they block me then I'll just choose to make Yahoo or, probably, ICQ more valuable instead.

    26. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phone company isn't offering free directory services and free conections to other users.

    27. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone please enlighten me: why isn't IM a P2P thing?

    28. Re:IM now ... Mono Later ?? by danheskett · · Score: 1

      MS was aking IM people for an open standard for communications, and AOL declined.

      Big suprise now that MS is going to do it themselves.

      I am exactly saying the thing with the AT&T market, except building a new telephone system would cost billons if not trillions of dollars. Building a new IM market costs virtually nothing. Additionally, any company can follow a myraid of exisiting standards like Jabber and have a ready to go solution for no upfront cost.

      The fact is that MS has gone out of their to be friendly with IM products. You can make competition to MSN, give it away for free, and integrate it into Windows without cost. Asking MS to incurr costs on thier end, to allow 3rd parties to use their servers, their technology, and their staff because they have a monopoly in an *unrelated* market is absurdity gone wild.

  16. Working for me by phaze3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    CenterICQ is working fine on MSN for me at present...

    --
    Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    1. Re:Working for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm using the latest verion of it and am not able to connect any longer. are there some regional restrictions?

    2. Re:Working for me by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... interesting. It doesn't work directly for me, though I am able to connect using a Jabber gateway. The centericq main and fan pages suggest that it doesn't work directly and that the main developer is still considering whether he should add support.

      So, what version are you using?

      Alternatively, have you tried disconnecting and reconnecting? It may be that you were already connected before the change and hence won't have problems until you reconnect.

    3. Re:Working for me by phaze3000 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I noticed these posts afterwards. I'm using plain vanilla centericq 4.9.7.

      I'm beginning to think you might be right about the disconnecting/reconnecting thing - I've been connected since Monday to the server at 207.46.106.96.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    4. Re:Working for me by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 1
      Well, I am a couple of versions behind you (4.9.5) but konst (the author of CenterICQ) has implied that support isn't currently there. See his website here and scroll down to the section entitled Protocols Strike Back.

      Also check out the FAQs on the CenterICQ fan site.

      Anyway if you have a problem in the future use a Jabber gateway. Matthias Wimmer helped update the Jabber MSN gateway to support the latest protocol and provides a free server on amessage.info along with a working Jabber gateway. It is what I use.

      Best of luck!

    5. Re:Working for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was online most of the day yesterday with CICQ, but after i closed it and reopned it, that was it.... :(
      I supposed that if gaim can log in, probbaly CICQ could see hwo that works to make msn work again :)
      isnt that what opensource is about?

    6. Re:Working for me by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 1

      I think he understands how to fix it but is more worried about the DMCA implications of reverse engineering the protocol. I think he is waiting for Microsoft's response to the others before he decides to implement a fix.

      I suspect in the future it will be fixed but in the mean time a jabber gateway will allow you to connect.

      On the plus side Yahoo does work in 4.9.7! ;-)

  17. am stilled logged on by odt · · Score: 1

    using bitlbee . i'll just keep the client running and hope it won't disconnect ;)

  18. Gaim just bit the dust! by McCall · · Score: 1

    I loaded Gaim for the first time this morning, and I was unable to log into MSM using my hotmail.com account. I loaded Firebird so I could visit Gaim's website to see if this was a known problem, and my homepage told me all I need to know.

    This isn't a major problem, there are plenty of other IM clients and networks, the problem is getting all my Windows and Mac using friends to move over to using them.

    I am not bitter though, after all its their network, bandwidth and development time, but perhaps its time to renew my interest in Jabber and see exactly what it can do....

    Andrew McCall.

    1. Re:Gaim just bit the dust! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Gaim just bit the dust! by blackwing0013 · · Score: 1

      What version are you using anyway? 0.71 works fine. And I just used it to chat with someone on MSN a few minutes ago.

    3. Re:Gaim just bit the dust! by Stween · · Score: 1

      blackwing0013 is correct. Current versions of Gaim work. MSN Protocol v.9 was only implemented a couple of versions ago in Gaim (0.69, to be precise).

    4. Re:Gaim just bit the dust! by Charion · · Score: 1

      Err.. I use Gaim V.0.60 and I'm still connected to MSN... *Only reason I use Gaim is for MSN.

    5. Re:Gaim just bit the dust! by Stween · · Score: 1

      Well a version that old shouldn't be able to connect. The only reason it might be able to connect is if for some reason you're connecting to a bizarre server which for some reason hasn't been upgraded. Which you probably aren't.

      I'm guessing that you've just not disconnected from MSN in the last 48 hours, and you're being a smartarse ;)

  19. want to chat? pay by Dreadlord · · Score: 1

    checking MSN messenger website, looks like this isn't the only change MS has done to it, chatting in chat rooms is now a subscription service, off MSN website:
    In order to protect you from spam, unwanted conversations, and advertisements, MSN(R) Chat is now a subscription service. While you may enter any chat room you like, you must be a subscriber to participate.
    They are charging $19.95 per year.
    I've also tried AMSN a couple of hours ago and it still works.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
    1. Re:want to chat? pay by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1
      User* Dreadlord = Slashdot.getUser(671979);
      Dreadlord->printSig();


      Psssh. Your blatant misuse of a non-const object pointer gives you away as a Microsoft plant. I scoff.

      *Scoff*

      Of course, I did pay the $19.95.

      Slow night. ;/
      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    2. Re:want to chat? pay by lintux · · Score: 0

      They're probably talking about the chatrooms, like, the IRC ripoffs nobody should be using anyway.

      I can't imagine groupchats won't work anymore.

  20. 1337 biotches by lo_fye · · Score: 1

    The problem with all you leet biotches is that while you say "I don't use MSN", the fact is that most of us are forced to, in order to communicate with our lame parents & less techie siblings who love the bubbly goodness (in their words) that is MSN. I much prefer ICQ, but I'm forced to Trillian, and have Y!, AIM, MSN, ICQ accounts. How long until Trillian supports a Skype plug-in?

    --
    geeks are cats who dig a certain kind of cool
    1. Re:1337 biotches by Troed · · Score: 1

      USA or Europe? _Everyone_ I know (and I've got a lot of friends and old co-workers on my list) use ICQ. We kind of never saw a reason why we should switch from ICQ to something that hasn't got all the features (offline messaging, anyone?). Getting my parents to use ICQ was as easy as .. uh .. installing it for them.

      ... and I'm in Europe.

    2. Re:1337 biotches by RogueProtoKol · · Score: 1

      I'm in the UK, I only use MSN atm, I have all 4 clients but don't need them atm, most of my contacts are either school friends (i'm 16) or clan related (moh, clanbase)

    3. Re:1337 biotches by tuzzer · · Score: 1
      USA or Europe?

      Maybe 'Europe' is a little too generic. I'm in the Netherlands and all my co-workers use MSN (unfortunately). Most of them never even heard of ICQ. MSN comes with the OS, it's free, so why install something else? Most of my 'foreign' friends use ICQ though.
      --

      bash$ less COPYING
      bash$ more CREDITS
    4. Re:1337 biotches by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Yahoo messenger supports offline messaging.. and webcams and voice.. and file t/fer... well, ok it doesnt do sms I dont think but does most of the useful stuff that icq does...

      I personally use Trillian on Windows which works fine on all the IM services (and its skinnable) On Linux, use gaim.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    5. Re:1337 biotches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSN comes with the OS, it's free, so why install something else?

      Because when I first started using ICQ, msn didn't exist.

  21. GAIM =( by Meleschi · · Score: 1

    Gaim .70 is not working any longer. I'm sure it'll be a matter of minutes before it does. ;-)

    --
    Meep Meep!
  22. ccmsn and amsn are a no-go by Digital+Dharma · · Score: 1

    As is my Exchange Messenger client 4.7. All I get is an error about an unsupported protocol.

    --
    End of Line.
  23. Gaim 0.70 and 0.71 by rf0 · · Score: 1

    Gaim 0.70 stopped working for me last night with a Protocol not support message. 0.71 just won't load the plugin coming up with MSN is unsupported. Of course this could be to do with my config. However now I will start to have to look at alternatives as I'm on a number of MSN accounts for business reason.

    Prehaps MS has worked out that some people are using MSN for support of non MS platforms so wants to kick us all off. Then again if trillian has died as well prehaps I'm just been to suspicous. :)

    Rus

    1. Re:Gaim 0.70 and 0.71 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to compile gaim with SSL support, You need either gnutls or for that. Gaim 0.72cvs works fine.

  24. What is IM? by pesc · · Score: 0, Troll

    Excuse my ignorance (I'm not so familiar with Windows), but what is this IM everyone is talking about? What does it have that, say, IRC does not? Is IM important?

    --

    )9TSS
    1. Re:What is IM? by 0xbeefcake · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well the most recent version of M$'s instant messaging uses TLS/SSL and it works through HTTP proxies too. IRC, last time I checked, doesn't do these things (although I haven't used it in a while). Plus they are aimed at slightly different audiences. IRC is great where you want to hop on a channel where you want to meet strangers interested in the same subjects as you, where as IM clients are more geared towards 1-on-1 chatting with existing friends and colleagues.

    2. Re:What is IM? by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Acronym for Instant Message. 13..12..11..10..9..8..7..6..5..4..3..2..1

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    3. Re:What is IM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. Is the SSL connection client-to-client or client-to-server? If the former, how is key exchange managed (how do you know there's no man in the middle)? If the latter, what's the point (do you really trust the IM network's servers)?

      FYI, people have been doing client-to-client encryption of text on IRC channels for at least a decade, now. People have also been doing IRC through proxies for so long that servers now check to see if you're connecting via an open proxy. And, of couse, IRC over SSL has been around for ages, as well.

      Last time you looked, you must not have looked very hard. I mean, seriously... IRC is full of paranoid geeks with access to source code. It's inconceivable that there *wouldn't* be crypto support. The supposition that crypto support in messaging was somehow a Microsoft innovation is bizarre.

      Your point about channels vs. one-on-one communication is, of course, valid. That's why we have "talk" (for two decades, now, since 4.2BSD).

    4. Re:What is IM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Sir, please discard that VMS system running on a VAX, and buy yourself a computer.

      Next step, remove head from arse. Final step, read a geek site, like, oh I dunno, slashdot.org.

    5. Re:What is IM? by 0xbeefcake · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't know how it's done under MSNP as I haven't investigated, but I imagine that the guys who develop gaim, amsn, trillian etc can probably tell you. And no, I haven't used IRC seriously for many years, so thanks for the heads-up on the latest :P

    6. Re:What is IM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IM clients are more geared towards 1-on-1 chatting with existing friends and colleagues.

      Sort of like email then.

      I think I'll reinvent HTTP next. I'll call it something catchy, like "MU" and get everyone to fall over themselves to use this "new" service to do exactly the same things they could always do.

      IM is TEH SUCK, and there is no reason to use it. Real time chat : IRC. 1 to 1 time delayed chat : email. Stop being redundent.

    7. Re:What is IM? by veeoh · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh please - where have you been? Leave the server room for a while dude.

    8. Re:What is IM? by peterpi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, normal people know how to use it.

    9. Re:What is IM? by mattACK · · Score: 1

      The most recent version doesn't work on my proxy at the office. The last version to function is 4.7.

      --


      "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
    10. Re:What is IM? by wurp · · Score: 1

      IM is a generic term for instant messenger. AIM, ICQ, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber, etc. are all IM systems.

    11. Re:What is IM? by ChoyLeeFut · · Score: 1

      IM means Instant Message, or Instant Messenger. Some (not necessarily all) of the major players (in terms of unique protocols) are: AIM (AOL Instant Messenger), YM (Yahoo! Messenger), MSN (Microsoft's client), ICQ (from Mirabilis, arguably losing popularity), and the only open source contender I'm aware of is Jabber (www.jabber.org). There are also a number of multiprotocol IM clients, which (strive to) support most or all of the above, such as Gaim, Trillian, Miranda, just to name a few.

      --

      The postman hits! The postman hits! You have mail.

    12. Re:What is IM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question is why do we have all of these different systems (ICQ, AIM, YAHOO, MSN, etc..)?Each of these function by sending a text message to another person instantly. How are these systems different from each other? On IRC you can use a variety of clients to connect to the a server. You can use a variety of client to connect to an FTP server or mail server. What is special about Instant Messages that prevent a variety of clients for each system?

  25. Miranda works! by CoreyGH · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm using the MSN plugin that was included with Miranda IM version 0.3.1 I think that's the latest version. I have "Use MSN protocal v.8" checked in the options.

    1. Re:Miranda works! by Stween · · Score: 1

      I think MSN Protocol v.9 is the latest MSN version, and they're blocking anything from v.7 or before.

    2. Re:Miranda works! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that comes as no big surprise, with Miranda rocking the world of instant messaging. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Miranda works! by RabidMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Miranda is the best 'alternate' im client I've used ... it's features are great, file transfers seem to work where ICQ *AND* MSNs wont (although I can't get ICQ to work through my companys firewall, but their go.icq.com client does, so I must be doing something wrong - anyone seen an ICQ firewall plugin like the msn one that does http tunnels?

      I've gotten quite a few people to switch over, esp friends who ran both clients for years. Yes, it also supports Yahoo, but really, who uses yahoo?

      I think the best feature is all the coolass plugins that work so seamlessly.

      www.miranda-im.com

      --
      We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
  26. Re:Well... by daBass · · Score: 1

    No it's not free, it is supported by ads, which you do not see on 3rd party clients. What's even worse is that some of these 3rd party clients are FOR SALE! They make their money on Microsoft donating servers and bandwidth. As wrong as MS is in many cases, two wrongs do not make a right.

    OTOH, I do use Trillian at work on NT4, as the perfectly working MSN Messenger 4.6 is banned and 5.0 keeps disconnecting.

  27. AMSN is the client for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was running GAIM. I've been pretty happy with GAIM except for its lack of reliable file sharing. Anyway, it stopped working this evening for MSN. The CVS version wasn't any better (the build process failed to install the MSN protocol for some reason). I'm sure I could have dicked around with it for a while, but I decided to try AMSN. This sucker is sweet! I haven't tried file transfer, but it works right now on MSN and it looks exactly like the Windows MSN Messenger client. Too funny!

  28. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to them when they broke into AIM before MSN was commonplace.

  29. Re:Well... by John+Courtland · · Score: 0

    Not free as in "Free Willy"; Free as in it doesn't cost anything...

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  30. On a side note... by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is not directly attached to Messenger but rather their chat service.

    Oct 14th was the day they decided to also nix their free chat service in favor of their charge people roughly $20 a year for it.

    TK2CHATCHATA06 are 984 users and 45 invisible on 1 servers, this is roughly a 90% reduction from oct 13th.

    Why I bring this up you ask. Well very simple, msn is shooting them selves in the foot really. Their chat service it's very much possible they wanted roughly 90% of their population to leave, heck it's easier to manage. But the policy on Messenger clients, well I can't imagine anything really good will come out of banning 3rd party clients. Your typical user won't notice anyway, where as your power user with multi-clients will make a stand and leave for other services that work.

    But it looks good on paper, I imagine that's their pressent mission is with both Messenger and chat, making a good case for the shareholders why such services are money markers.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:On a side note... by gnunick · · Score: 1

      One of their main excuses for doing that was to curtail kiddie porn.

      If you ask me, restricting/curtailing chat rooms is a great thing. Let the kids talk to their existing friends on IM, but not venture into some public forum where anyone can accost/be"friend" them.

      But anyway, there's extensive discussion of the issue here:
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/31360 06.stm
      and here:
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/0 9/24/06 2218&mode=thread&tid=109&tid=126&tid=187&tid=9 5

      do the google if you want more...

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    2. Re:On a side note... by dirk · · Score: 1

      I don't see how nothaving extra people whogenerate no revenue hurts them. If people use the official MSN messenger client, their is advertising in it that makes them money to offset the cost of running the servers. If you are using a third party client, you are costing them money by using their servers and they are making no money in return from their client advertising. So they lose some power users who are costing them money, and you don't see the benefit of it?

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    3. Re:On a side note... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      If you ask me, restricting/curtailing chat rooms is a great thing. Let the kids talk to their existing friends on IM, but not venture into some public forum where anyone can accost/be"friend" them.

      With all due respect, MSN is not chat. They offered a very popular chat service but they are not chat. The techncique they are using was coined by Douglas Adams as SEP (Someone Elses Problem). If the kids can't chat or can't get their parents credit card, heck they'll go to yahoo, irc.

      So.. what happens when MSN stops dropping their 3rd party IM support... as well as their online chat support? Adults and kids alike go elsewhere, it's not about restricting/curtailing at all IMHO it's just now someone else's problem.

      Heck, I know with the room I maintained, part of my mission was to collect the names of all who used it... and either tossed either either an e-mail from MSN's friendly profiles, or invited them into a moderated room to give them the url with the correct information. Lastly was the "add me to messenger" for the remaining users who who didn't get the memo. My target were people who used the room on the regular basis... the same procedure coudl be done by someone who's agenst is to accost/befriend folk. Esp easy when given given MSN's pulling of the plug.

      I feel part of the problem is the fact that it was so remarkably easy to stalk people on MSN messenger and chat service, and you still can with ease regardless of the age specified in profiles. That issue clearly has not even been addressed.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:On a side note... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I don't see how nothaving extra people whogenerate no revenue hurts them

      Very simple... the cost of advertising is based on viewer ship. Even 3rd party clients are *users* included in the viewship calculations.

      If you are using a third party client, you are costing them money by using their servers and they are making no money in return from their client advertising.

      When your getting the ratings of a TV show, you don't take into account that they might go to the bathroom during the comercial break, or might actually be recording it and killing the comercials. A 3rd party client is still a possible viewer of adverts, and does serve to increase their numbers.

      While the internet is a little bit diffrent, in the fact you can actually establish whether or not a specific file was accessed, and that would be taken into account as well. But you can't tell if it was actually viewed by a person, or if they were AFK or it was sent to /dev/null.

      So they lose some power users who are costing them money, and you don't see the benefit of it?

      No I don't, when it's the power user who acts as a trendsetter to many. They get money based on how many people use the service. Power users get frustrated and dont' use the product. Power user informs others that they are being boneheads and encourage others not to use the product.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:On a side note... by Valar · · Score: 1

      100% of their previous chat 'customers' x $0 = $0.
      ~10% of their previous customers x $20 a year = Well, some quanitity above zero, assuming that anyone used it to start with.

    6. Re:On a side note... by dirk · · Score: 1

      Third party users are not potential viewers. The only people who can view the ads are users of th official client. And internet ads aren't based on number of potential viewers, they are based on either click-through or actual page loads. Third party clients never load the ads, which means they lose out on both counts. They get no money from the ads, as they are never loaded at all.

      As for power users being the trendsetters, I ask why Windows is the OS of choice and AOL is the number 1 ISP is this is really true.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    7. Re:On a side note... by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      If people use the official MSN messenger client, their is advertising in it that makes them money to offset the cost of running the servers.


      What advertising?

      I'n running MSN 4.7.2009 right now, Copyright 1997-2002 Microsoft Corporation - I see no ads whatsoever. Not only that, but there isn't any ad placeholders.

      (Hmmm... this looks like something to add to my "Stuff" CD-RW - a lightweight official MSN client that doesn't display ads. )
    8. Re:On a side note... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      As for power users being the trendsetters, I ask why Windows is the OS of choice and AOL is the number 1 ISP is this is really true.

      Less you forget pre 1990 time, where there really wasn't public internet access as we know it. There were a vast number of services which include on the top of my head

      Compu$erve
      GEnie (noted for their 1/2 duplex mode)
      American Online
      Prodigy

      The only people in the market for the above service pretty much were power users who needed the ability to access files, and e-mail. I had a Compu$erve account for a very simple reason, e-mail and access to a vast file library. In 1982, it was brillent!

      Times are diffrent now, but we must not forget that these popular services provided content and services long before internet access was available. Compu$erve didn't suck all that much in 1982-1988, it was among of the oldest pay networks around.

      Regarding Windows... well like it or not it's very popular. Just because someone uses windows doesn't mean they are not what you'd consider to be a power user. Many of my best friends run windows. There is alot of major power applications for Windows that have yet to be produced for Linux or other platforms. Lot's of Mac power users too. The power users seek those power applications that make the investment in the computer and software possible.

      AOL though, flat out sucks, probally not your typical power user's choice. But hey, what person with a clue doesn't reccomend "drop your AOL it sucks". They do have a strong foothold over the present market, and that's not likely to change anytime soon. Like it or not, it's still a very legit choice for those people who travel over seas, who want a local dialup in places like Australia and England. Compu$erve too is also a legit choice due to the vast number of lines. They both *suck* but have an important the important feature of wide spread availablity. It still sucks, but who else but the megaISPs offer such a feature.

      Third party users are not potential viewers. The only people who can view the ads are users of th official client

      I guess this depends on how microsoft bills for their adverts. We're not talking amature website with a click on me banner, we're talking about a multi-billion dollar corp. I can not believe that 10% of even 3rd party users doesn't add to the value. They are users, even if they can't see the adverts doesn't mean they are not listed as being potentical viewers. If I was microsoft, and I was selling ad space, I wouldn't even put that on paper, i'd just look at the number of passport users as tell companies that this is the user base.

      Now... if Microsoft was smart, they would spam anyone not viewing the mandatory adverts to folks who are not getting them via the normal way. Problem solved.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  31. Miranda by Seahawk · · Score: 1

    Miranda works fine - actually I could only log on to MSN this morning - ICQ didnt work! :D

  32. P2P solution? by corsetboy · · Score: 1

    Has anyone written a P2P IM app? It seems at the moment that MS are trying to get control of IM in general (I suspect that the non official clients will have more and more trouble adapting in the months ahead), but with P2P we wouldn't need to rely on a central server. It could even use public key encryption of some form, then allow messages to be routed via other clients if required. Maybe someone's already done something like this? Or is there any big problem that would prevent such a solution?

    1. Re:P2P solution? by arevos · · Score: 1

      Jabber is moderately P2P, or at least as P2P as email is. There is no central server that jabber clients have to use. Two jabber clients can be on separate servers, but still communicate. In theory, one can have a server per client, and thus true P2P, but it is rather less efficient.

      The only reason I can think of having a true P2P IM is for anonymity. Otherwise, if you just want decentralisation, use Jabber.

      As an added bonus, many jabber servers have "gateways", something built into the jabber protocol that allows intercommication between other IM services. Ideally, that also means that one only has to patch the server to keep up with stunts like the one MS has pulled. The clients don't need to worry.

      That said, the MSN gateway on my jabber server is down. D'oh! Doubtless it'll be patched in a while though :)

    2. Re:P2P solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Closest thing would be Jabber. You can run multiple servers (which are peers), and then you have clients that talk to particular servers. Your Jabber ID ends up being user@server (like email).

      It would be GREAT if ISP's got behind this standard and provided Jabber servers just as they provide mail servers.

    3. Re:P2P solution? by Intosi · · Score: 1

      Dude, upgrade your msn-transport. The new msntransport 1.2.8rc1 works with the new protocol...

      --

      Intosi

    4. Re:P2P solution? by arevos · · Score: 1

      I would if I could but it's not my server. Hopped onto jabber.org.uk (which got far more takers than the hoster originally intended). So I just need to wait. I'm in no hurry, anyway :)

  33. Gaim 0.70 Working by Book16 · · Score: 1

    Gaim 0.70 is still working for me. Hopefully it keeps working. Otherwise I'll have the painful job of trying to convince all my contacts to use jabber!

    --
    -- Book
  34. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it isn't within their rights to use their desktop OS monopoly to create a new monopoly in instant messaging technology.

  35. USE JABBER. BE SAFE FROM MICROSOFT'S EVIL PLANS. by anti-NAT · · Score: 0
    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  36. User-Agent spoofing is your friend! by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
    Go get yourself Kopete. Then, change ~/.kde/share/config/kopeterc . Here's the snippet (the [MSN] part is already there, just scroll down to it and add the second line)

    [MSN]
    UserAgent=0x0409 winnt 5.1 i386 MSNMSGR 5.0.0 MSMSGS

    As usual, Windows users are SOL if you don't want to use the official client.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:User-Agent spoofing is your friend! by hswerdfe · · Score: 1
      As usual, Windows users are SOL if you don't want to use the official client.


      nope my gaim 0.7 works fine under windoze...
      --
      --meh--
  37. Too bad... by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 1
    ...that they can't do the same for SMTP. I would really like that, because then no idiot with an Outlook Express would be able to fill my mailboxes with stupid worms like Swen.

    Besides that: Limiting acess to services would be like if you allow only a certain type of cars on the road or a certain type of lightbulbs to be plugged into the sockets of your house. Yeah, welcome to the dark age... :-)

  38. Trillian by David_R · · Score: 1

    I've had to upgrade to the latest version (0.74f) of Trillian Basic, but it's working just fine -- chatting with someone at the moment in fact. It wasn't working earlier when I was still on version 0.74d but the later version seems to have sorted it out. It's also connecting to Yahoo! successfully as well (something the earlier version had stopped doing).

  39. OS X: Proteus fine by mccalli · · Score: 1
    The poster mentions Fire, which is the OS X client that I've been using. I'm annoyed that Fire has stopped working, however Proteus 3.0.3 is working fine.

    Of course, Proteus is shareware, not free or open source. Does anyone know of an OS X client that's free and still working? Other than Messenger itself of course - that's ad-supported and I hate adverts.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:OS X: Proteus fine by mibus · · Score: 1

      I personally use Gaim under X11 on OSX. It's... not the best? There will hopefully be a native Aqua Gaim in a few months though, after the core/UI split.

      I was under the impression that one of the options in Mac MSN (3.5 at least) was to turn off the advert pane?

    2. Re:OS X: Proteus fine by Macka · · Score: 1

      that's ad-supported and I hate adverts.
      Huh? I use the Microsoft MSN client on OSX and I don't see any ads. Then again, I also have a purchased copy of MS Office v.X installed, so maybe the presence of the latter is having an influence?

      Macka

    3. Re:OS X: Proteus fine by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      I would say forget msn and use iChat to connect to AIM.

    4. Re:OS X: Proteus fine by salimma · · Score: 1

      You can use Gaim on OS X by installing Fink. It's not really native OS X though, but who knows - the developers are working hard at splitting Gaim's core and UI, so a Cocoa UI might be feasible.

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    5. Re:OS X: Proteus fine by the_proton · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the code I wrote for Proteus has been committed to Fire CVS, there should be a release real soon now(tm).

      - proton

    6. Re:OS X: Proteus fine by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Thanks a lot for this information - I will keep an eye out then.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    7. Re:OS X: Proteus fine by gbooker · · Score: 1

      It is being tested... The problem is that the changes rely on the ssl in the libcurl library that 10.1 does not have. Fire is maintaing compatibility with 10.1, proteus does not. Expect a release today.

      --
      You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
    8. Re:OS X: Proteus fine by rf600r · · Score: 1

      Proteus 3.0.3 is NOT working fine for me and has not for several weeks now. It feels like I have tried everything; obviously I have not. Suggestions?

  40. Do you Yahoo? (SPFB/KT) by dwhittington · · Score: 1

    Who do you want to talk to on MSN, anyway?

    Yes, I'm kidding. While, I have no real IM protocol preference. I find it humorous to see those who have 2-3 IM clients running to keep track of everyone they know.

    As a GAIM user, it's even more fun to hear, "Oh, thank god you're on client xyz... I'm dumping client abc tomorrow".

    I'm about ready to dump all the big ones and change my alias to "see you on jabber.org".

    -David

    SPFB/KT= Self-Proclaimed Flame Bait/Karma Test

    1. Re:Do you Yahoo? (SPFB/KT) by Cantaro · · Score: 1

      Well, I do Yahoo, but since none of the clones (Miranda, Trillian, GAIM, whatever) can do both voice and cam in Yahoo, I stick to the original client. Give me a client that does both voice and cam on Linux or FreeBSD using the Yahoo protocol, and away goes the original Yahoo Messenger, and Windows with it.

    2. Re:Do you Yahoo? (SPFB/KT) by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      Trillian Pro I believe can do both, but unfortunatly that isnt free. (the free version cant)

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
  41. [paranoia] help MS ! by mirko · · Score: 1

    Of course, if you all report which actual 3rd-party clients versions are working, MS people will find it easier to prevent these from connecting...

    Or you could switch back to ICQ which is OK when it comes to instant messaging.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  42. Trillian 2.0... by SlashChick · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...works fine with MSN as of now.

    Anyone using an earlier version should upgrade to 2.0 to fix any MSN imcompatibilities.

    1. Re:Trillian 2.0... by alexo · · Score: 1


      > Anyone using an earlier version should upgrade to 2.0 to fix any MSN imcompatibilities.

      Trillian Pro 2.0 phones home. 'Nuff said.

  43. Re:GAIM =( by tero · · Score: 1

    Well, my Gaim .71 seems to be working just fine, so go ahead and upgrade, the latest version is available here: http://gaim.sourceforge.net/downloads.php

  44. They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by grahamlee · · Score: 4, Informative

    What happened was that yesterday, the older MSNP8 protocol for accessing the MSN Messenger Network was discontinued; only clients capable of the new MSNP9 protocol can now connect.
    MSNP9 is actually better than the previous protocol (as well as incompatible :-( but you can't have everything) because it negotiates via the Secure Sockets Layer; i.e. your IMs are encrypted with a strong algorithm and cannot easily be read by people with NICs in promiscuous mode on your network hardware.

    There already exist third-party clients that can make use of this newer MSNP9 system; if your client does not then maybe it's worth (i)switching, (ii)asking the maintainers to add support, (iii)grabbing the source and doing it yourself you lazy wossname! However, Trillian frmo Cerulean Studios apparently does the business. I am currently connected to the MSN Network by Al's MSN; you must use at least v0.83 in order to connect.

    1. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by DocDendrite · · Score: 1

      I know this is off-topic but I'd like to give kudos on the INCREDIBLY INFORMATIVE PARENT POST.

      Score 5 doesn't cut it here - the original article should not have been posted under the "kickbanned" heading at all. Thankfully the informed reader was able to post an explanation relatively early but I'm sure many slashdot readers simply noted the story as "more MS shenanigans" without reading any comments.

      It's a shame really, the bias on slashdot. On one hand the industry pays a lot of attention to this site for its cutting edge coverage. On the other hand it loses so much respect from the industry for its lack of editing or fact-finding. Sometimes, the main Slashdot stories are just flat-out wrong. In this case it's even worse because of the knee-jerk reaction of an uninformed user. Then again, the editor could have done some checking too.

      Anyway, this story *definately* deserves an "Update:" if the parent post is correct. I hope the editors do the right thing.

      -DD

    2. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by the_proton · · Score: 1

      Correct except for one detail:

      Microsoft dropped support for MSNP7 and earlier. MSNP8 based clients are fine. What this basically means is that SSL logins are the only ones allowed (via Passport), as this was added in MSNP8.

      - proton

    3. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      your IMs are encrypted with a strong algorithm and cannot easily be read by people with NICs in promiscuous mode on your network hardware.

      Umm... No.

      Only the authentication uses SSL. The IMs still travel plaintext (go grab a packet sniffer if you don't believe me).

    4. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by tunah · · Score: 2, Informative
      i.e. your IMs are encrypted with a strong algorithm and cannot easily be read by people with NICs in promiscuous mode on your network hardware.


      Actually, the IM part of the protocol has changed very little (at all?). What's changed is the login procedure. Previously, the server would send you a token, you would append your password and send them the MD5 hash. Now, the messenger server gives you some tokens, and you log onto passport, passing these on to the server. The passport logon uses HTTP with SSL, so your password is encrypted. The login process gives you the single-sign-in cookies (which unofficial clients ignore) and an authentication string to send back to the messenger server.


      It seemed to me that the login process was slower with MSN 6, I guess this is why - it requires about four HTTPS requests. (They optimised the contact list download protocol to reduce this slowdown).

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    5. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by nagora · · Score: 1

      Is this actually any more secure than the old system?

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    6. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I switched from amsn to first gaim and then kopete ages ago, but my sister was still on amsn. However, she has a maxed out user list (something like 200 contacts, don't know the exact maximum), and any amsn version newer than 0.7something (don't remember the exact version) crashes within 10 minutes of opening her huge contact list (no such problems on my comparatively tiny list of 12 people). I switched her to kopete, it still works, she's reasonably happy with it, though she complained about the UI lacking intuitivity. She said something along the lines of "how do I see what email addy people have?" and "how do I change my nickname?". Obviously both are possible in kopete, but I'd have to say they're a little non-obvious (why is the only way to change your nickname from the not-apparent-as-a-control msn icon?).

    7. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Only as far as your password being encrypted. Your messages are still sent as plain text.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    8. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, it is an INCREDIBLY INCORRECT PARENT POST.

      Perhaps you should read the article to stop looking so foolish?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by DocDendrite · · Score: 1

      No, its not "incredibly" incorrect. I am right. The details of what's changed in the two MSN versions are moot. The point is that only subtle (and documented) changes are what's preventing SOME 3rd-party clients from connecting. Therefore, Microsoft did not "kickban" anyone and suggesting otherwise is journalistically irresponsible.

      -DD

    10. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by nagora · · Score: 1
      But surely, according to the previous description at least, the password was not sent clear-text anyway; an MD5 hash of a one-use string combined with your password was sent. Surely this is as secure as the new system for sending the password. Or am I missing something?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    11. Re:They have not "kickbanned 3rd-party clients" by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      Only the extent to which SSL is used, which I admit to having misread from the amsn website. The rest is correct, especially (as DD has already said) the punchline that no-one has been kickbanned from the MSN chat network.

  45. "Kickban"? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    Was the word 'ban' not clear enough?

    1. Re:"Kickban"? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Things like that happen when you let IRC users post news stories. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  46. How will I talk to... by ChronoWiz · · Score: 1

    I am sure that many of you are in a similar position to me: you use the MSN to keep in contact with many of your friends who are less interested in technology than yourself. Now, suddenly, I'll be unable to contact them online unless I use WINE to run the MS client, or wait around for someone to come up something that lets us log onto the MSN. I'm assuming that this would be, however, illegal organisations such as Cerulean Studios wouldn't be able to sell their product. There's no hope in hell I'll be able to convince any of my less technilogically adept friends to use jabber, or even ICQ (!), since nothing will have seemed to change on their side. I'm currently running some old version of Trillian on WINE, and it is unable to connect. A friend tells me GAIM 0.70 works.

    1. Re:How will I talk to... by warriorpostman · · Score: 1

      This is the $100,000 question. I'd like to switch over to Jabber, but Trillian helps me hook up with my AOL, MSN, and Yahoo pals...I tried Gaim, but it was breaking on Windows a few months ago, and I went back to Trillian. I'm getting really tired of MSN or Yahoo implementing barriers to third-party parasite clients (which I concede they are within their rights to do), and I'm ready to try something completely separate from the big conglomerates.

      Now, as long as Jabber installs easily and has a nice interface (which I imagine it does), that would be a starting point for convincing friends/chat-acquaintances to switch over. I find that with my less-technically inclined friends, working the anti-corporate angle helps to influence them to try something new. My dad, and a few friends have started using OpenOffice, and were very impressed with the results. They like the idea of using something that doesn't require them to pay big bucks to m$.

      I find that very casually mentioning a certain piece of software (ie. Mozilla or OpenOffice) tends to pique people's interest more effectively then when I go on a rant about evil Microsoft and the holy Open Source...So how well does Jabber work? Any criticisms ... praises?

      Anyway, chat shouldn't be this difficult!

  47. Re:Well... by sh10051 · · Score: 1

    It's well within their right to choose who gets to use their free service no one actually disputed that in any comments above so why post it?

  48. msn 4.7 by solidox · · Score: 1

    windows messenger 4.7.2009 works fine :)
    my version of it dosn't have any advertisting on it, altho a mates does which i think it due to that silly MSN addin that lets you view profiles and crap.
    the msnmsgr 0.5 extension for firebird/mozilla dosn't work.

    --
  49. I'm throwing in the towel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right thats It I'm switching back to ICQ. I went from ICQ to MSN and now I'm going back. I got some friends who use AIM as well so can anyone tell me if I can add icq numbers to my AIM client and can I use my ICQ account on it?

  50. SSL libraries, Re:Gaim 0.70 and 0.71 by skandalfo · · Score: 1
    In order to Gaim 0.7[01] to compile and use the MSN plugin supporting the new MSN protocol, you have to install the proper development files for the Mozilla/Netscape security libraries (SSL support required by the new protocol).

    In my Mandrake 9.0 system, the packages are:

    [skandalfo@cat skandalfo]$ rpm -qa | grep libns
    libnss3-1.1-10mdk
    libnspr4-devel-1.1-10mdk
    libnspr4-1.1-10mdk
    libnss3-devel-1.1-10mdk
    SUSE systems also have mozilla development packages, but these are installed to non-standard locations, and you'll have to provide their locations to Gaim's configure script manually.

    RedHat systems should behave mostly like Mandrake.

  51. Jabber MSN Transports affected by Rock-n-Rolf · · Score: 1

    Another related problem is that some of the transports that connect the Jabber network with the MSN network don't work anymore. The Jabber network supports connections to most of the other IM networks such as MSN, AIM, ICQ and Yahoo. But people using an affected MSN transport can't contact their MSN buddies anymore.
    Maybe we can gather a list of currently working MSN transports here?

    1. msn.gate.amessage.de
    2. ?

    --
    In Korea, all your base are Only For Old People
  52. Re:P2P solution? - use Jabber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use Jabber for gods sake...

    It's not p2p as such (NAT's a bitch) but it's there and it works. If you are that much of a P2P fanboy install a server on you PC...that's about as P2P as you would need.

  53. duh by TunaPhish · · Score: 1

    That's because you're using 0.66. Why don't you try upgrading?

    The gaim folks added the new MSN protocol in 0.69 and currently 0.71 is the latest release.

    It connects to MSN now assuming you have the mozilla-nss or the gnutls package installed.

    1. Re:duh by x-router · · Score: 1
      I am currently emerging (gentoo) 7.0.

      Perhaps you should consider upgrading your inter-person coms software out of beta too? :)

  54. Re:Jabber MSN Transports affected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the amessage ones should work as Matthias helped write the transport patch. Ask your server admin to upgrade to the latest CVS

  55. SSL Libraries... Re:Gaim... by skandalfo · · Score: 0

    Please see this comment.

  56. bitlbee by stefanjo · · Score: 1

    Bitlbee worked fine until about 5min ago when I tried to disconnect and reconnect again. Get the same as GAIM: MSN - Login error: Protocol not supported.

    1. Re:bitlbee by lintux · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You should've stayed logged in. Microsoft did not throw anyone out, they just forbid some people to come back when they leave. ;-)

      I'll quote the BitlBee FAQ here about this matter:

      Will MSN ever work again?

      In theory: Yes. Gaim still works, so with some efforts those fixes should be portable to BitlBee. That's going to be quite a lot of work though.

      Unfortunately Microsoft is threatening with the DMCA to anyone who touches "their protocol". Probably not a big issue, but certainly not something we want to have trouble with. Even though the local European/Dutch law allows reverse-engineering for interoperability, we don't feel like being banned from the USA, especially not by Microsoft.

      Anyway, ATM backporting changes from Gaim would be a waste because the current IM-system used by BitlBee is about to be ditched in favour of something new/better, which means all the efforts put into a fix would be wasted. We know we've been saying this for ages, but this time we really mean it! ;-)

      And as always, if you do feel like spending your time on this, go ahead and write a patch. We'll see what we can do. Let's hope DMCA doesn't prohibit our site to link to your patch. Oh, sorry, I promised to stop being paranoid eh?

      ATM I don't feel like wasting my time on this, especially as long as they're still talking about these licenses. I can't imagine they won't cut off Gaim and other clients again soon. Why would anyone buy such a license right now if they can get on the network without one as well?

    2. Re:bitlbee by stefanjo · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know I shouldn't have tried it but I couldn't stop myself ;)

      Gaim 0.70 works ok for me though so its not that bad.

  57. AMSN doesn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:AMSN doesn't work for me by 0xbeefcake · · Score: 1

      You need the very latest version, 0.83. You also need the TLS module, which is downloadable separately. Then you must ensure that it is configured correctly. If you are running through a HTTP proxy, in the preferences window go to the Connection pane and try changing it to use 'SSL (CONNECT method)'.

  58. Re:USE JABBER. BE SAFE FROM MICROSOFT'S EVIL PLANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah and get disconnected all the time...
    Well jabber is nice, but most jabber servers just suck.

  59. GAIM 0.70 by ^DA · · Score: 1

    GAIM 0.70 works fine.

    When I updated to Gaim 0.69 I got rid of the nag messages so I guess they worked around or something like that.

  60. Re:Well... by hkmwbz · · Score: 0, Troll
    When I bought Windows XP they included MSN messenger with it, and nagged me to sign up and connect. Fine, apparently I gained access to an IM network by purchasing Windows XP. And therefore I should be able to choose which client I wish to use when I access it.

    Right?

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  61. FUD by FLoWCTRL · · Score: 1

    GAIM 0.70 works fine...

  62. Re:Well... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Why not? It's just a comment, like every other comment on Slashdot.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  63. AMSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Latest version of amsn amsn.sourceforge.net works perfect. Also consider using other alternatives.

  64. Easy solution, ignore MSN, migrate friends. by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    The obvious solution is to ignore MSN and have everybody who wants to contact you use something else. If enough people do this instead of banging their heads against the monopoly brickwall others will follow. Nobody wants to use an IM client that no friend of theirs use. I doesnt use MSN anymore and if anybody wants to IM me they better get some IM that has linux/mac/whatever support.

    We all new this would happen as soon as MS had gotten a big enough userbase.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  65. Still working for me. by zsau · · Score: 1

    I looked on 15 minutes ago (and it's the Australian evening on the 16th by now, but I'm aware they ban us in US time).

    --
    Look out!
  66. Grrrr by thrill12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish I could say:
    what do we care, we just use any of the other IM's out there...

    But then I think of the people I know that use MSN without protest, who have no problems with their connection, people who use MSN Messenger.
    People I do not dislike for that fact: they know not better. Now the foul sword of Bill cuts the one link we had to try and gain a symbiosis between our species.

    What now?
    Shall we cease our diplomacy and switch over to the other IM?
    Shall we resist our attempts to keep ourselves free and mindlessly implement the twisted program that is called MSN Messenger? The thought alone strikes fear in me!

    I take the one and only possible step: resist the urge for getting together online:
    I will simply use the phone.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  67. centericq cant log in too :-( by horcy · · Score: 1

    I'm running centericq -> http://centericq.de and no more access to the msn network. It's a bloody shame.

    --
    Check my site: http://pixel.pagina.nl
    1. Re:centericq cant log in too :-( by John_Renne · · Score: 1

      It looks like I got the same problem. The status window keeps saying connecting to server for a while and after a while seems to time-out. It gives a disconnected :-(

      Time to get everybody on IRC, Jabber, etc.

      --
      /(bb|[^b]{2})/
    2. Re:centericq cant log in too :-( by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 1

      I use centericq and can connect to people on MSN just fine. I was chatting to someone on MSN less than 5 mins ago.

      How?

      I use Jabber to connect to a gateway. :-)

    3. Re:centericq cant log in too :-( by xlcus · · Score: 1

      Can you explain how exactly to do this in centericq? I've just set up a jabber account, so what's the next step? I can't find any gateway options anywhere.

      Thanks,

      Jonathan

    4. Re:centericq cant log in too :-( by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 1

      Ok, I should explain that I wasn't sure about setting up gateways either in the past so I sent konst (the author of CenterICQ) a message via ICQ. He explained that he didn't use gateways so wasn't sure either! :-( Which implies that that gateways are not fully supported by CenterICQ. He did say if I continued to have trouble he would look into it. In the end I cheated a little, I have used the jabber client PSI in the past so I reinstalled this and connected to my jabber account and used it's interface to set-up the Gateway (which was fairly staight forward). Afterwards I disconnected and reconnected with CenterICQ and all was fine, the gateway was up and working.

      So my answer is. I'm not sure how you setup Gateways in CenterICQ and it seems like the author of the program doesn't know either. However, if you can get the gateways setup via another jabber client, once done, they will work in CenterICQ.

      I might have a bit more of a play around later today. If I have any success using CenterICQ alone to setup a Gateway I'll post back here. Similarly, if anyone works it out I'd be interested to hear how.

      If you can't wait and have X installed (or access to a Windows machine) you could 'cheat' as I did.

  68. Jabber MSN gateway seems to be working by Schreckgestalt · · Score: 1
    Our Jabber server has an MSN transport set-up. It still seems to work, although it's using the latest version of the transport that clearly stated that it's going to work after Oct 15.

    Server admins go here for an updated version.

  69. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When Microsoft was fighting AOL, because AOL wouldn't let MSN use AIM servers for free, every Microsoft-fanatic was claiming that AOL was the bad guys.

    Now that Microsoft is closing their own network, Microsoft fanatics are claiming that it is well within their right to choose who gets to use their free service

  70. Re:My IM client works by hdparm · · Score: 1

    Yes, because he's running windows.

  71. Thats the problem with specialised clients by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    All the clients do (with a few extra bells and whistles) is allow you to talk online. This isn't a big deal. Instead of following the relentless
    upgrade path for all these stupid clients (not just for MSN) that seem to want to go the bloatware route of most browsers , just use IRC or
    just log into a talker program using telnet. If you can't like without a point a drool interface then keep getting stressed about this sort of thing ,
    but if you're actually interested in what these things allow you to do (ie talk) then investigate the above alternatives. Its not rocket science.

    1. Re:Thats the problem with specialised clients by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      The point of using a service such as MSN, from the perspective of an average non-MS using person is that you are using it to communicate to people that use it by default. Are you trying to tell me that I now have to get all of the people I know who only use MSN to switch to IRC?

    2. Re:Thats the problem with specialised clients by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Why not? A lot of people use multiple services anyway so what difference will adding IRC to that list make?

    3. Re:Thats the problem with specialised clients by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      Who is "A lot of people"? Most of the people that I need to talk to on MSN don't use multiple services and frankly they shouldn't have to.

    4. Re:Thats the problem with specialised clients by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Ah well , if suddenly they find they can't use MSN for whatever reason (client doesn't work , it gets shutdown as in the UK, MS starts charging)
      then I hope they won't bleat about how they've suddenly been cut off from all their online friends. Eggs and baskets spring to mind...

    5. Re:Thats the problem with specialised clients by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't evangelize to my family and friends. I just use what's right for me.

  72. Gaim & Mandrake 9.1 by genzil · · Score: 1

    The latest version of Gaim from the homepage works (on Mandrake 9.1), it still connects.

    You might need a few other files but it doesn't take long.

    For example I needed (in this order):
    libnspr4-1.3.1-4.1mdk.i586
    libnss3-1.3.1 -4.1mdk.i586
    libaspell15-0.50.3-1mdk.i586.rpm
    li bgtkspell0-2.0.3-3mdk.i586.rpm
    gaim-0.71-1mdk9.1. i586.rpm

    I installed using urpmi for all but the gaim rpm.

    The used as normal.

    1. Re:Gaim & Mandrake 9.1 by CyberPsyko · · Score: 0

      The platform I am using is Red Hat 9 and Gaim 0.71. I am not having any problems either.

  73. AMSN for UNIX by igny · · Score: 1
    AMSN is working just fine.
    IMPORTANT!!! After October 15th, MSN Protocol Version 7 (MSNP7) won't work anymore. You must use MSNP9, available in AMSN 0.83. To choose the protocol version, you must go through the "Login as..." dialog.
    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  74. One answer, plain and simple: by Saib0t · · Score: 1

    Their Service, Their Hardware, Their Resources, Their Choice... ...

    --

    One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
    1. Re:One answer, plain and simple: by Steffen · · Score: 1

      You obviously weren't around here a few years ago when Ms were allowing their client to connect to AOL. AOL changed their protocol, Ms changed their client.

      If Microsoft made the CHOICE to use their desktop monopoly to try and stamp out other IM networks, they shouldn't complain when others act as they do.

    2. Re:One answer, plain and simple: by lowieken · · Score: 1

      Their network. Their protocol. Their hardware. Their cost ... MY contacts!

      If I can only get in touch online with my contacts on terms that comapny X sets unilaterally, there is a problem.

      Some kind of regulation is desperately needed here.

      A more healthy situation for the IM world would be like:

      Companies X, Y and Z provide instant messaging services.
      * X, Y and Z must fully disclose all their messaging specs.
      * The user must be able to export all of his/her user information (contacts!) from the company X, Y or Z network painlessly.
      * X, Y and Z can't offer any messaging clients themselves (no messing with specs, guaranteed).
      ? X, Y and Z aren't allowed to check what messaging client is being used. Just to make sure they don't discriminate.
      * X, Y and Z can charge every user a uniform, transparent access fee, flat or usage based. No fee discrimination based upon client paltform.

      These conditions look fair to everyone:

      The offering companies can make money from competing for the user's IM traffic.

      The users aren't locked in to any IM network.

    3. Re:One answer, plain and simple: by Saib0t · · Score: 1
      Well, AOL back then was free to change their protocol, did you see microsoft cry foul when AOL did? The situation was the same back then. AOL's protocol, AOL's choice.

      As you rightly pointed, microsoft changed their client as a consequence of AOL's protocol change. That's what current clients have to do too.

      Besides, I'm not happy with MS's way of doing things so I don't use their products when I have the choice. There are lots of IM networks out there, pick a non MS one and stop complaining. After all, if you're not able to stand for what you think is right for something as trivial and non vital as an IM program, how dare you start criticizing...

      --

      One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
    4. Re:One answer, plain and simple: by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Screw them! I'll build my own IM network! With hookers. And gambling. On second thought, forget the gambling!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  75. Trillian Pro 2.0... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

    Trillian Pro 2.0 is working fine for me.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  76. Re:Jabber MSN Transports affected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Make sure to install the latest transport on the jabberserver you're using :

    http://msn-transport.jabberstudio.org/

  77. What is the sound of one knee jerking? by TCaM · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok maybe a few thousand knees.

    Seriously they announced this a while back as a PROTOCOL upgrade, they are locking out all older protocol versions, including I would assume ancient versions of their own messenger.

    Update your software people.

    1. Re:What is the sound of one knee jerking? by infiniti99 · · Score: 1

      Try reading the submission or the article next time. There is more here than just a protocol upgrade. Microsoft is setting up licensing arrangements for third-parties that wish to continue accessing the network. This is a huge issue if you don't use the official MSN client.

    2. Re:What is the sound of one knee jerking? by TCaM · · Score: 1

      I am quite aware of the content of the article. I am also aware that at this point only clients using the older and less secure protocol have been blocked. I and many other people that use current and up to date, non Microsoft clients are still using msn chat services with no problem. Yes Microsoft in previous statements announced that they intended to somehow license access to their network for third party clients, but at this point that has not been implemented. Non Microsoft clients have not as the author seem to be trying to indicate been locked out. Given all of this I stand by my assertion that the great wave of whining posts here qualifies as a knee jerk reaction.

  78. Re:USE JABBER. BE SAFE FROM MICROSOFT'S EVIL PLANS by panserg · · Score: 1
    1. I use jabber.org from time to time - works stable and fine to me.

    2. Most of time I use my own server, sharing it with few friends - never failed.

    3. Whatever server you use - you don't have to use the same server as your friends as jabber namespaces will let your messages be fowarded and find the way to be delivered any way no matter if one of servers is down.

    --
    "I shall explain this by waving my hands about in an appropriate manner." -- Cambridge University Math Dept.
  79. pebrot works by piranha(jpl) · · Score: 1

    Pebrot 0.8.1 works fine for me. It's a Python Curses-based MSN client.

  80. kopete works by anno1602 · · Score: 1

    kopete 0.7.2 works just fine.

  81. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong.

  82. So let me ask this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would WANT to chat with AOL or MSN weenies anyway? They are Lusers to the nth degree. There is NO problem at all!!! Not news, nor worth a shit. Why even bother?

  83. Re:GNU IS NOT ABOUT "FREE SPEECH"! by IonPanel · · Score: 1

    You are correct, GNU isn't about free speech, but also not Gay Sex, its about freedom to develop and know that your code will always remain your own, but you can work together with thousands of people about how to improve it. GNU is about creating an operating system that would be free, open and better than anything a corporation could create.

    And they have succeeded.

    --
    Dave Bell
  84. Windows Messenger 4.7 with Exchange IM also banned by wimbor · · Score: 1
    When logging in this morning on our company network, I noticed that Windows Messenger (the more polite version of MSN messenger with Exchange IM functionality) was also banned.


    I replaced it with Group Policy software installation by the new Windows Messenger 5.0 Client that can be found on the Microsoft website. After that both Exchange IM and MSN IM worked.

  85. Can't connect by Silent1 · · Score: 1

    using miranda and i can't connect to msn.

  86. Series60/Symbian? by EddWo · · Score: 1

    Are there any clients for Nokia Series60/Symbian that still work?

    I wanna get a 6600 but it sounds like it has been locked out before the phone is even released.

    --
    "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
  87. MSN thru Jabber works... by AceJohnny · · Score: 1

    ...on the amessage.* servers. They patched the transport a while ago. Never had to change clients.

    --
    Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
  88. Gaim... by jherekc · · Score: 1

    ...is working fine here 0.70

    --
    "lack of quality control is one of the pillars of slashdot"
  89. Oops... by jvervloet · · Score: 1

    According to grahamlee, Microsoft didn't lock out 3rd party clients, but just changed to a new (uncompatible) protocol. So nihil novi sub sole for the moment...

    1. Re:Oops... by duren686 · · Score: 1

      A new (uncompatible) protocol that's compatible with most of the major 3rd party clients, even. Really, there's much less of a story here than the title leads you to believe.

      --
      Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
  90. Proteus works too... by VirtualWolf · · Score: 1

    Version 3.03, anyway. Can't speak for earlier versions.

  91. Microsoft MSN Messenger for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on Redmond! How about an MSN messenger client for Linux? You can still provide the channel tabs and the advertising space - you'll just reach a few more people with the confidence that they are running code you wrote...

  92. Miranda-IM by lwells-au · · Score: 1

    My Miranda-IM MSN-connected client is responsive. LW.

  93. I pity MS. by azar0th · · Score: 1

    Someone said or I heard it's too costly for microsoft to allow 3rd party programs? I can't help but laugh at this, for other IM's do not block 3rd party programs, let's look at ICQ for example, which has been running for many years and with many many 3rd party programs available to use the network. Is ICQ complaining about this expense(if any)? and besides, it's not like Microsoft are low on cash, I would think microsoft would have much more money than Mirabilis/AOL/ICQ/Whomever owns icq.. Watch out the MS trolls are back on the loose again. The more microsoft do this sort of thing trulely makes me want to break and/or disregard their rules. I thank the community for open source.

  94. Amsn ok Gaim Fudged by Loosewire · · Score: 1

    Amsn have the new protocol gaim does not - gaim just gives a "protocol not supported " message on login. Amsn is working fine :-)

    --
    Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  95. My Gaim by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    Well I'm locked out of the MSN messenger network. I'm running Gaim .70, I'm wondering if .71 is as well. Though I know when i did a source compile of .72 I was strangely missing MSN plugins so I went back to .71 on my home box. Though seeing this now I see why.

    Amazing, Microsoft was so big on interoperability when they tried to open up the AIM networks. I can't help but think hyopcrits after witnessing their attempts to get in to the AIM network over a year ago. Yeah it's their resources, but they didn't seem to mind back then.

    This doesn't really push me towards their products. Infact it makes me want to get further away from them seeing their actions in this regard.

    Hell I still can't shutdown the MSN messenger client from my windows box totally even after I close it. It still sticks in memory and sends me alerts and messages even though it's not on my task bar or system tray. I have to CTRL-ALT-DEL the task manager up and whack the process.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    1. Re:My Gaim by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      One thing I noticed, the MSN protocol is still in gaim .71 but wasn't installed like it normally was even though I followed the documented install procedures for Gaim on my system anyway.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  96. Getting fire to work by michaeladams.org · · Score: 1

    I had the same problem with Fire, so after some quick sniffing round, found that the current version is being patched and due to be released soon. For those (like me) who can't wait, here are the instructions for building from cvs...

    Open a terminal and type in:
    cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.fire.sourceforge.net:/cvs root/fire login (press enter when prompted for a password)
    cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.fire.sourceforge.net:/cvs root/fire checkout -r Fire-0-32-Update fire

    Then open up the Project Builder file and click on Build. Worked a charm for me, no problems at all.

  97. GAIM by Drogo+Knotwise · · Score: 1

    GAIM still works...

  98. Tipic by zx75 · · Score: 1

    My TipicIM client v1.6 is still responsive as of 7am est.

    --
    This is not a sig.
  99. Stop it please ! This is not the problem at all. by theefer · · Score: 1

    What whould you say if your provider (let's assume he provides you with your email address as well) decides to prevent you from sending email to people who have another provider ?

    I have family all around the world, all of them using MSN simply because it's the one thing that is already installed when you buy your computer. Then it's the same with their friends, and they indeed end up locked up in MSN Mess(enger).

    Now I do not use MSN, for ethical and technical reasons (I do not work under w$). Is it normal that Microsoft controls whether I can talk with my family or not ? I do not agree on that. And making it understood to the rest of the family is not an easy task, because they won't leave MSN so easily...

    What you said is true : they pay for the bandwidth, etc. The real problem is the fact that this is a closed protocol. Had it been open, and would it allow other people to act as servers, we would have open servers (or could make our own) that are not controlled by m$. That's the point.

    Proprietary stuff restricts the user. It might be normal for them to do so for economical reasons. Then it is not normal for users to use proprietary solutions that can control them. Having people relying on proprietary programs and protocol is dangerous and soon problematic.

    That's as simple as that.

    --
    theefer
  100. Miranda IM MSN still works by whatever3003 · · Score: 1

    Miranda IM requires a MSN plugin upgrade to v.8 if you havent done so already. :) cheers

    --
    "Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing." -- Salvador Dali
  101. Why must I submit? by Luketh · · Score: 1

    I don't buy this whole "it's for security reasons" crap about blocking 3rd party clients... MSN's security isn't *that* bad. My call would be it's to keep direct control to monitor its users and distribute ads. What I want to know is why a company like Microsoft needs to support adware for revenue? Call me paranoid.

    --
    A computer without a Microsoft Operating System is like a dog without bricks tied to its head
  102. Re:Well... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    You must have broker into one of our "Microsoft-fanatic" meetings where we all get together and discuss what our approach to the next issue will be, didn't you? I mean surely that is the case, rather than there being tens of thousands of people posting on here, all with different beliefs and perceptions.

  103. miranda-im works fine with msnv8 protocol by yuud · · Score: 1

    updated miranda-im.org's client to the latest protocol plugin for msn - restarted - works fine! miranda-im > trillian, imho.

  104. Miranda not working, Trillian is! by amembleton · · Score: 1

    Miranda stopped working yesterday with MSN.

    This morning I downloaded the latest free version of Trillian and all is well, I can chat to my mates on MSN :)

    1. Re:Miranda not working, Trillian is! by riqnevala · · Score: 1

      You must be american.

      --
      love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
  105. Re:GNU IS NOT ABOUT "FREE SPEECH"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " know that your code will always remain your own"

    Not correct, when you GPL your work you give up any ownership over it. Read the why-software-shouldnt-have-owners on the GNU homepage.

    The FSF's goal is socialism (freedom from owners) in the software field specially and most people in it probably want it in all parts of society.

  106. Gaim 0.68 vs 0.71 by znerd · · Score: 1

    Gaim 0.68 indeed disconnected with a Protocol Error, but I upgraded to 0.71 and my problem is gone. I checked the ChangeLog, but I could not find an entry that would explain why 0.71 does work.

    1. Re:Gaim 0.68 vs 0.71 by ospirata · · Score: 1

      You could not connect with Gaim 0.68 because the MSN Protocol version 9 support was added at the 0.69 number.

    2. Re:Gaim 0.68 vs 0.71 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's right here under 0.69:

      * Updated MSN support to the MSN Protocol version 9.

  107. Re:Trillian plain works too by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    who would pay for a closed-source clone? geez...

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  108. I used to be an avid reader... by Osrin · · Score: 0

    ... stories like this just want me to logoff from /. for good. Once upon a time this site contained "News for nerds, and stuff that matters." Now it's increasingly just becoming a bunch of anti-Microsoft bullshit.

  109. Messages are NOT encrypted in MSNP9 by Anonymous_yes__Cowar · · Score: 1

    d_no

    Hi !

    Just checked with the ethereal packet sniffer (http://www.ethereal.com/) and the answer is NO, MSNP9 does not encrypt the actual messages, just the password for logginf into .NET...

    if you want encryption go with gaim-encryption (http://gaim-encryption.sourceforge.net/), preferably used with another protocol, like Jabber

    Regards, The Anonymous One

  110. Mod Article -1 by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Total baloney. MS has not kickbanned anything, they just switched over to MSNp9, which any respectable client has been using forever.

    Shameless plug, KDE/QT lovers should try out Kopete, a great alternative to GAIM.

  111. WinGAIM by JeremyALogan · · Score: 0

    WinGAIM 0.69 is working just fine... haven't checked GAIM 0.70 for Linux... yet.

  112. Gaim .70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gaim as of 6:46 am, is not able to connect to msn

    1. Re:Gaim .70 by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Game .70 cannot, .71 can. Upgrade. My wife (on Windows) and I (on Linux) both upgraded to Gaim .71 yesterday and we're on MSN Messenger fine. Of course I also got my wife going on Yahoo and ICQ in case MSN gets mean and really shuts us down.

      It seems that for now they are only insisting on their new protocol. It remains to be seen whether they later truly boot unwanted clients.

    2. Re:Gaim .70 by zombie-m · · Score: 1
      .70 cannot, .71 can

      Actually, 0.70 works fine for me. According to the Changelog, support for MSNP9 has been there since 0.69.

  113. Messages are NOT encrypted in MSNP9 by Anonymous_yes__Cowar · · Score: 1

    Hi ! Just checked with the ethereal packet sniffer (http://www.ethereal.com/) and the answer is NO, MSNP9 does not encrypt the actual messages, just the password for logging into .NET... if you want encryption go with gaim-encryption (http://gaim-encryption.sourceforge.net/), preferably used with another protocol, like Jabber Regards, The Anonymous One

  114. MSNP9 DOES NOT ENCRYPT ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Some posters seem to be of the opinion that the new MSNP9 protocol encrypts their actual messages with SSL, this is wildly incorrect !! Only the .NET logon password transmission is encrypted, all messages are in plain text... Go Grab you favorite packet sniffer (http://www.ethereal.com/) and check for yourself, i did, it's all their in plain veiw of anyone... Then go get gaim-encryption (http://gaim-encryption.sourceforge.net/) get safe, be free ! Regards

  115. welcome to the gnu millennium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    little wonder why the felonious kingdumb of payper liesense softwar gangsters/stock markup FraUD execrable, is hysterically attempting to pen in/suck more monIE from, it's hostages?

    our sympathies to the remaining hostages of the naykid furor. it must be whoreabully embarrassing/expensive.

    freedom/progress is just a click (or two) away.

  116. Re:Gaim... - I may connect after rebuilding by ospirata · · Score: 1

    I received the same message. I was unsing Gaim 0.70 self-building. I knew that the new protocol used ssl, then I tryed to compile it using Mozilla SSl libraries. It is working now.

  117. Does no one remember? by Ath · · Score: 1

    When MS Messenger was first released, it included the ability to send messages to AIM users. AOL kept blocking MS Messenger connections until Microsoft finally gave up. They complained loudly the whole time about this blocking.

    What's good for the goose is good for the gander. But this is typical MS behavior. Now that they have a stronger user base, they talk a different line.

  118. Gaim works by L.Schierer · · Score: 1

    As a gaim developer, I am rather annoyed that this has been posted to /. in its current form, as it will just generate huge amounts of needless traffic. MSN did not block all 3rd party clients, they just restricted access to the server to clients using msn protocol version 9. Gaim 0.70 or 0.71 (the current release) compiled with ssl support (provided by the gnutls or the combination of nss and nspr) will connect sucessfully to msn. There is however some trouble with our current proxy support that users are confusing with being blocked.

    Next time you might try actually connecting with a recent version of gaim or at least visiting our website before assuming we are blocked.

  119. Re:GNU IS NOT ABOUT "FREE SPEECH"! by CaptainTux · · Score: 0
    Not correct, when you GPL your work you give up any ownership over it. Read the why-software-shouldnt-have-owners on the GNU homepage.

    In fact, wasn't this one of the reasons the BSD license was created? To address the issue of code ownership in a community project?

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
  120. Configure line to build gaim at SuSE 8.2 by ospirata · · Score: 1

    YOu will need several packages to build gaim, such as gtk2-devel, glib-devel, mozilla-devel. If you install all the needed packages, get the gaim 0.70 source and use this configure line:
    ./configure --prefix=/opt/gnome CFLAGS="-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 " --enable-nss=yes --with-nspr-includes=/opt/mozilla/include/nspr --with-nss-includes=/opt/mozilla/include/nss --with-nss-libs=/opt/mozilla/lib --with-nspr-libs=/opt/mozilla/lib

  121. Re:GNU IS NOT ABOUT "FREE SPEECH"! by Channard · · Score: 1
    and know that your code will always remain your own.

    You are the the head of SCO, and I claim my five pounds.

  122. move along, people... by DrWhizBang · · Score: 0

    Proteus is working fine, so is Gaim, and (gasp) MSN Messenger. Upgrade your clients, and chill out...

    --
    Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
  123. Re:Alvaro's MSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,
    Alvaro's MSN isn't a memory pig, it's just the tcl/tk you are using that needs an upgrade, all redhat users should recompile their tcl/tk because the one shipped with redhat has a big memory leak. It has been discussed alot in AMSN's forums..

  124. MSN on Pocket PC ceases to work by chrispix · · Score: 1

    For the past month I have been getting messages on my dell axim, that I need to go upgrade. Every time I goto the site to upgrade... Sorry the upgrade for pocket pc is not available yet. So now I am without MSN messaging on my pocket pc. Anyone else have this issue. Now I can't log in, and I don't know where the site was to go see if they released it yesterday.

  125. Re:Nope by cybergibbons · · Score: 0

    What is it with this place and the stupid high and mighty attitude people have?

    "I don't use windows; I use linux so I'm not effected by the latest virus (but, I can't use hundreds of pieces of software, play the latest games, or have a box that most people can use)"

    "I don't use the MSN network; I use AIM so I have no problems (but 90% of my friends use MSN, and don't want to bother installing another IM client because the one they have works, so I'll just not talk to them)"

    "I don't use IE; I use Mozilla so I have no problems (but it takes more than 30 seconds to load on my system and won't load a lot of pages - I hear you say they aren't valid html, but that's how they are written, and I can't help that)"

    "I don't use Office; I use some crap substandard package (but I can't open doc files and find it funny to post a message to mailing lists saying "How about plain text for us linux geeks?" every time someone uses the format)"

    The point is, no one really cares what one up their own arse geek does - 90% of the world can't be arsed fucking around and take the easy option

  126. Jabber! by pointwood · · Score: 1

    The XML and open standards based alternative works fine here :) Including the MSN gateway.

  127. Re:USE JABBER. BE SAFE FROM MICROSOFT'S EVIL PLANS by TheCabal · · Score: 1

    Jabber may be find for a small set of people who want to keep in touch, but we've found that the code is way too immature to support a corporate clientbase. There are a lot of features that MSN Messenger has that Jabber doesn't and won't have in the forseeable future, and a lot of the missing features are basic things. In addition, I really don't care for Jabber's method of dealing with various issues "Just telnet into the Jabber port and send raw XML to the server! WHEEEEEE!".

  128. I use kopete by msh104 · · Score: 1

    it feels nice and integrated op my kde desktop and version 0.73 is now able to run msn better that it ever did.

    1. Re:I use kopete by aelfwyne · · Score: 1

      Kopete from version 0.72 works fine with MSN (KDE/Linux). By far my favorite, if only for the fact it'll dock in the KDE bar.

      If you use the Yahoo plugin, you'll need 0.73, since it is broken in 0.72.

      --
      -- If it ain't broke - overclock it more.
    2. Re:I use kopete by Li0n · · Score: 1

      Gaim also docks, and so does Everbuddy as far as I remember.

      What kopete _should_ support is the freedesktop.org systray protocol so it's not restricted to KDE only.

      --

      ~
      ~
      :wq
  129. Is there a different host/port we can connect to? by suman28 · · Score: 1

    I was reading an article on the net that said that gateway.messenger.hotmail.com port 80 would work for those behind the firewall, instead of the usual messenger.hotmail.com on port 1863. Has anyone found this to be true? What other options do I need to set for this to work fine?

  130. Why is this even relevant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does anyone care if MS shoots themself in the foot and disconnects their users from the rest of the world? It will lead to the demise of Messenger, not domination.

  131. That's all right by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1

    All MS Messenger was good for was letting me know when I got more span in my hotmail account...

  132. Kopete is also working by duncanmacvicar · · Score: 1

    Kopete >= 0.7.2 MSN plugin uses MSNP9 protocol and you're able to login. Kopete is not limited to MSN, there are plugins for Jabber, ICQ, Gadu, Samba, AOL, Yahoo, SMS and more.

    Kopete CVS (kdenetwork module of KDE) is also the first open source client supporting MSN (>msnp9) display pictures (thanks to Olivier Goffart). You will enjoy this if you use KDE 3.2 alpha releases or build from cvs or... wait for KDE 3.2.

    Kopete site
    1. Re:Kopete is also working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shameless plug... :-)

  133. Getting Gaim working on XD2 and RH9 by moorg · · Score: 1

    To get gaim working you will have to install from source as Ximians latest supported release is 0.63.

    You must make sure that you have the Mozilla/Netscape SSL layer devel rpms installed. Fire up Red Carpet and grab mozilla-nspr-devel and mozilla-nss-devel.

    This will get you connected using the MSN plugin and should hold you over until Ximian releases and official RPM. I have posted to the Ximian user mailing list asking for an official stance on the progress of this package.

  134. Re:GNU IS NOT ABOUT "FREE SPEECH"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When you GPL your work you still have ownership"

    Not in any real way, no you haven't. And that is the point with the GPL, it should belong to everybody.

    Socialism is the core of the free software foundation, software shouldn't belong to any author.

    Check out "Why Software Should Not Have Owners " under "philosophy" on www.gnu.org.

  135. Still working.... by irabinovitch · · Score: 1

    I'm using GAIM 0.70 and its still working fine with MSN. A few weeks ago I was receiving regular messages from the MSN service telling me to upgrade to the latest version of MSN.

  136. Trillian 2.0 works partially by mlawmlaw · · Score: 1

    I've got the latest version of Trillian (2.0) and I can't maintain a connection. It connects, then instantly disconnects. I am behind a firewall, but previous versions of Trillian worked fine. There tech support tells me that it is probably due to the fact that 2.0 uses a protocol that is very recent, and that they are working on a solution to this, although they can't replicate the problem themselves.

    1. Re:Trillian 2.0 works partially by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      2.0 works just fine here behind OpenBSD's pf. I even can see that I have new mail.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    2. Re:Trillian 2.0 works partially by ciphertext · · Score: 1

      I'm behind a NAT box and I have no issues with Trillian 2.0 connecting to the MSN chat servers. Obviously, I had to open the ports necessary in the firewall, but it works fine for me.

      --
      To know is to have knowledge....to understand is to be enlightened.
  137. Miranda IM is ok so far by santos_douglas · · Score: 1
    I'm using Miranda 0.2.1 with the MSN plugin and things are working fine so far.

    Miranda, in case you were wondering, is a tiny (fits on a floppy) stand alone, low frills IM client.

  138. Gaim 0.70+ works by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

    I'm logged in right now.

    --
    oogly boogly!
  139. Work Here by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Gaim v0.70

  140. yep my gaim didnt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this morning gaim tried to log me in and said:
    protocol version not supported

    oh well

  141. Compiling Gaim MSN plugin properly by funk_phenomenon · · Score: 1
    In order to compile Gaim 0.71 and greater the best library to install is GNUTls. I compile all my programs from source and got GUNTls to work with the MSN plugin. In order to install GNUTls you need the following libraries:
    libgcrypt-1.1.43
    libpgp-error-0.5 (libgcrypt requires it).
    opencdk-0.5.1 (This is required for the proper compilation of gnutls, since it doesn't properly check for the --no-opengpg flag in the configure script).
    gnutls-0.9.90 (This version is reuired for the proper handshaking in the Gaim MSN plugin).

    I know that also had to change some of the source code of gaim-0.71 (specifically file plugins/ssl/ssl-gnutls.c), since some of the functions in libgcrypt-1.1.43 had changed the number of parameters. The extra parameter is a size_t of the size of the buffer being passed. The older version of libgcrypt had done a sizeof inside the function, but now require the coder to supply the function with the size. I did this by passing the sizeof of the buffer to the function as a parameter.

    The reason I went through all this is because the Gaim plugin would not handshake with GNUTls-0.8.11 because of a capability not being installed for certificate checking, which is found in 0.9.90, but 0.9.90 requires the libgcrypt-0.1.43 library. I am sending this post to the Gaim maintainers to let them know about the extra parameter needed to use the 0.9.90 GNUTls library.

    After all this I got the handshaking to work (I checked the debug code for Gaim), and am happily able to log on MSN properly.

    --

    Even the samurai
    have teddy bears,
    and even the teddy bears
    get drunk

    1. Re:Compiling Gaim MSN plugin properly by funk_phenomenon · · Score: 1

      Actually it wasn't the Gaim code I had to change, it was OpenCDK, since GNUTls was having a problem compiling without it. When you try and compile the OpenCDK code you will see the problem with specific functions complaining of a wrong number of parameters. The functions are from the libgcrypt-1.1.43 interface and are: gcry_mpi_scan and gcry_mpi_print in the majority of changes. I'll alert the OpenCDK maintainer due to the change in the libgcrypt interface.

      --

      Even the samurai
      have teddy bears,
      and even the teddy bears
      get drunk

    2. Re:Compiling Gaim MSN plugin properly by joxn · · Score: 1

      Could you be a bit more specific? What exactly did you change in the source? Currently I am not able to compile the necessary sources.

      Thanks very much.

    3. Re:Compiling Gaim MSN plugin properly by funk_phenomenon · · Score: 1

      Here's some steps:
      1. Get all the sources I listed on my original post
      2. Compile and install libgcrypt-1.1.43
      3. Compile and install libpgp-error-0.5
      4. Compile and install opencdk-0.5.1. This requires to change some function calls in the source. I'll list the files and the functions to change.

      src/seskey.c:144: - change
      rc = gcry_mpi_scan (&a, GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, frame, &nframe);
      to
      rc = gcry_mpi_scan (&a, GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, frame, strlen(frame), &nframe);

      src/seskey.c:173: - change
      rc = gcry_mpi_print (GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, frame, &nframe, esk->a);
      to
      rc = gcry_mpi_print (GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, frame, strlen(frame), &nframe, esk->a);

      src/pubkey.c:47: - change
      gcry_mpi_scan( &d[i], GCRYMPI_FMT_PGP, m[i]->data, &nbytes )
      to
      gcry_mpi_scan( &d[i], GCRYMPI_FMT_PGP, m[i]->data, strlen(m[i]->data), &nbytes )

      src/pubkey.c:177: - change
      gcry_mpi_scan( &m, GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, md, &nbytes )
      to
      gcry_mpi_scan( &m, GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, md, strlen(md), &nbytes )

      src/pubkey.c:217: - change
      gcry_mpi_print( GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, NULL, &nbytes, m )
      to
      gcry_mpi_print( GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, NULL, strlen(NULL), &nbytes, m )

      src/pubkey.c:220: - change
      gcry_mpi_print( GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, buf->data + 2, &nbytes, m )
      to
      gcry_mpi_print( GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, buf->data + 2, strlen(buf->data)+2, &nbytes, m )

      src/pubkey.c:584: - change
      return GCRYERR_INV_PK_ALGO;
      to
      return 4;

      src/keygen.c:469: - change
      rc = gcry_mpi_print( GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, a->data+2, &nbytes, resarr[i] );
      to
      rc = gcry_mpi_print( GCRYMPI_FMT_USG, a->data+2, strlen(a->data)+2, &nbytes, resarr[i] );

      5. Compile and install GNUTls-0.9.90
      6. Compile and install Gaim-0.71
      7. Run gaim with a debug window when connecting to MSN and see if the handshake works. It should

      I hope that helps you and everyone having a problem building from sources.

      --

      Even the samurai
      have teddy bears,
      and even the teddy bears
      get drunk

    4. Re:Compiling Gaim MSN plugin properly by joxn · · Score: 1

      Thanks very much.

      However, I also had to remove the tests from the Makefile because otherwise tests/t-stream.c would fail.

      Afterwards, opencdk (and gnutls) compile fine.

  142. Time for a new IRC by JoAnywhere · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the comment someone made about MS having every right to ban third party clients was actually quite correct. However, it also seems to me that surely this argues for a successor to IRC. Ideally it would be an open source successor and one that ran on decentralised servers etc etc... Potentially even a P2P chat environment with NO real servers!!! Does a product like this exist (but not in common usage) Regards Jo

  143. Re:GNU IS NOT ABOUT "FREE SPEECH"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might also want to check out The GNU GPL and the American Way, as well as The GNU GPL and the American Dream, Freedom or Power?.

    Freedom is being able to make decisions that affect mainly you. Power is being able to make decisions that affect others more than you. If we confuse power with freedom, we will fail to uphold real freedom."

    To summarize, the GPL doesn't affect what a developer can do with his own code. That's what copyright is for. The GPL gives us the right as users to do what we want with that code, and protects those rights from the stinking pussbags at SCO.

  144. Re:Stop it please ! This is not the problem at all by danheskett · · Score: 1

    Is it normal that Microsoft controls whether I can talk with my family or not ?
    Shut the fuck up. There are dozens and dozens of alternatives. DOZENS. MS does not control whether you talk to your family or not. They are FREE TO USE ANYTHING THEY WANT - ANY OF THE COMPETITION. JUST AS YOU ARE.

    On top of that MS makes it easy to swap out Windows Messenger for an alternative - the latest version of AIM for example will integrate into Windows directly and be accessible just like MSN using a standard published MS API.

    Proprietary stuff restricts the user.
    Yes. Luckily there are alternatives.

    Having people relying on proprietary programs and protocol is dangerous and soon problematic.
    Its not dangerous you over-reactionary zealot. Use something else. Jabber. AIM. IRC. Whatever. Just quit your whinning. MS doesnt rule the world. It's not the be-all end all of the world. Get it?

    MS designed a product. They wrote some software for it. The distribute it under terms and conditions. They changed the terms. Period. There are no exceptions, no circumstances which justifies people complaining about this. Like it, or leave it.

  145. MS tells AIM, be more open; closes own protocol. by Amiasian · · Score: 1

    You know, the whole situation with MSN trying to make it so that it no longer works with third party clients anymore sucks. It better not work! I like Fire. MSN doesn't have the necessary features which I'd prefer the most. Its logging system, for example, is shit. The Mac OS X client, on quit, pops up an annoying dialog to ask whether or not you'd want to save the conversation. Well, of course I do. That's why logging was enabled. Grr. And another thing, MSN does not recognize my wheel mouse. What the heck? I hate standard scrolling now that I can just wheel up and down. Any app that lacks the ability for such a, now-a-days, basic and simple feature is broken, in my view.

    Here's an example of the messed up logging formatting:
    Date Time From To Message
    7/17/2003 19:09:15 Me (@) some-one-else (@) hi!
    7/17/2003 19:09:15 Me (@) some-one-else (@) how are you?
    7/17/2003 19:09:15 (@) some-one-else (@) Me I am great! and you?!

    Now, that's in a table - so it should be obvious why copy and paste is officially screwed up. Seeing the person the message was sent TO right before the message can definitely be confusing as it looks like they sent it instead What's the point of saying it's to any certain person in any case?

    Now, even if I finally find a way to fix the whole auto-logging on problem, there are times that I just want to check who's on... not necessarily chat - yet. So, it would definitely be nice to be able to log in with "Appear Offline" until otherwise selected.

  146. My full version of Trillian isn't working (n/t) by Horkdoom · · Score: 1

    My full version of Trillian isn't working (n/t)

    1. Re:My full version of Trillian isn't working (n/t) by LostSinner · · Score: 1

      i'm using trillian 2.0 and it connects without a problem.

    2. Re:My full version of Trillian isn't working (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mine is just fine...and my wifes

    3. Re:My full version of Trillian isn't working (n/t) by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 1

      My AMSN 0.82 doesnt connect

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    4. Re:My full version of Trillian isn't working (n/t) by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1
      My AMSN 0.82 doesnt connect
      Correct. aMSN 0.83 (released on the 14th) introduced the MSNP9 protocol. You'll also need to download TLS extensions but aMSN guides you through this. aMSN SF site Dominic
  147. And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So use a different service.

  148. Gaim - Official Status by ChipX86 · · Score: 1

    Okay everyone, I've seen a lot of misconceptions and misinformation once again on Slashdot about this whole situation.

    Here's the deal.

    MSNP7 was discontinued. NOT MSNP8! This was done because MSNP7 and lower used an MD5 challenge in order to authenticate with the servers. MSNP8 and above use SSL.

    Now, Gaim DOES work with the new protocol, and has for about four versions. All you need to do is install the SSL libraries. It's your choice of either Mozilla NSS or GNUTLS. Information on all of this is found at our FAQ. The current version of Gaim will tell you that the protocol plugin for MSN could not load, if you don't have SSL. The next version will load, but tell you to grab the SSL libraries, if it can't find them. That should be slightly more helpful..

    It's really not a big deal, like I tried saying last time. They're not kicking off third party clients. They're discontinuing a less secure authentication method. Don't panick unless we do ;)

  149. amsn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    amsn.souceforge.net is fine has got a update for msn9.

    peace
    cyph

  150. Trillian Pro 2.0 by cyanobyte · · Score: 0

    Works great, no problems here. They even found a way around the warning message. Cyanobyte

  151. I love spin by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "MSN officials said that about 98 percent of its customers have made the necessary upgrades."

    means:
    MSN officials said that about 98 percent of its customers have made the forced upgrades.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  152. Gaims still fine by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

    nah Gaim's fine jabber's agent's are having problems on works jabber server but Gaims fine

    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  153. Marketshare Reports by KrazzeeKooter · · Score: 1

    All I really want is to watch market share. Does anyone know of any standard market share reports for IM. Something like Netcrafts marketshare server reports, but for IM. I read some stuff on something like a 90% drop in traffic in the last 24 hours, but that sound's a little improbable, and their is much more to the story than the last 24 hours.

    --
    I am a monkey. This is slashdot.
  154. Proteus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proteus from Indigo Fields works w/ MSN, but not Yahoo!.

  155. Dude, you are a freakin' retard! by FatSean · · Score: 1

    God DAMN, there are so many things wrong with what you've said. Have you no concept of enterprise? I suppose MS should just allow anyone to link servers into their network, huh? So can I come over to your crappy house and serve up porn through your internet connection? I mean christ...you can always use one of MANY other choices and get off your lazy ass and instruct your family on how to use them. It's not Billy's fault you and your wretched clan are too stupid to figure that one out. Get a better job and use the telephone...long distance is cheap now.

    --
    Blar.
  156. M-o-n-o-p-o-l-y by phorm · · Score: 1

    If everyone was given a free yearly pass with the newspaper to use a local cellphone-type network, whatever, for about 1-2 years, and somebody else paid for the maintainence etc... what do you think would happen?

    The majority of people would flock to the free provider, others would lose a lot of business, many might go under.

    However, some people don't like the provider's phone, so many make their own and use the network. The service is still available to anyone, and there's no real visible difference in most cases between people using the official and non-official phones.

    Then, one day, the provider decides to lock out all non-official phones. Now, anyone not using the "official" phone cannot talk to those using the official. Also, since free phones and service were given out, many other networks have already gone down or lapsed into the disuse by majority.

    Users of unofficial phones now either have a choice of losing touch, getting their friends to switch to a different network, or switching to the provider's network. Oh, and you have to buy the overpriced and undervalued newspaper to get the phone.

    Maybe not the best analogy, but the best I can think of offhand, with coupons coming in papers, etc.

    MSN comes with windows, thus many people automatically use it, much like IE. One day, they decided that only the official client can use the network, thus killing it for others. It hurts competing IM networks, and it hurts competing OS's that can't use messenger. And I'm sure that somebody in MS thought of this, perhaps even planned it with the programs that are often included in windows. Basically, it's a case of "switch, and you lose the ability to interact with everyone else using this service." You can expect the same with MS Office soon... as DRM will likely make OpenOffice have a lot of difficulty in compatibility....

  157. Additionally by phorm · · Score: 1

    You might want to consider that the reason given was "age verification to protect children" - however, it requires subscription to a regular service. If you wanted to verify via Credit Card whether somebody was of age or not, a simple $2-3 charge, one time, would suffice.

    More like an attempt at "get 'em hooked free, then make 'em pay for me." Gee... who else uses such a strategy?

    1. Re:Additionally by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Actually... I wonder about this.

      I mean, typicaly speaking most checking accounts have an automatic debit and a credit card compatabile number. I'm not under the age of 18 any more, so I don't know how difficult it is to get checking account if you are under age.

      I do know that some bank offer something called a kids credit card or some such. Basicly it's like a credit card as far as the machines are concerned, you transfer money into it much like a checking account, but is something marketed to for parents to give to their kids. I'm not sure how widespread the use of such products are, but I can imagine it would be a viable alternative for parents who need to give their kids money for expences, yet be able to control how much and have some ability to declair it lost or stolen.

      It still requires kids to have parents willing to do this, but in this day and age, I don't see how a credit card number would nessicarly prove a person is of age. And this doesn't take into account kids who peek in their parents wallet and sign on for permission.

      You could say it's genius though, being able to dodge accountability. "It's your fault for giving your kids your credit card/bank card", or "it's the kid's fault for lying to us". I guess that's the art of bussiness, making it look good on paper but not nessicarly being realistic.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:Additionally by phorm · · Score: 1

      I think also, that age info is in some form tagged to a credit card. I know that many companies will not ship to an address that doesn't match the CC somewhat closely... indicating that they can grab certain amounts of personal info once they have your card #/expiry.

  158. Re:GNU IS NOT ABOUT "FREE SPEECH"! by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    "When you GPL your work you still have ownership"
    Not in any real way, no you haven't. And that is the point with the GPL, it should belong to everybody.

    If you release something under the GPL, you still own copyright, and you still have the right to relicense your code to other people under other (i.e. proprietary) licenses. (Namesys' license for ReiserFS is a good example).

    That having been said, if you wish to relicense code contributed to your GPL project by others then you have to obtain their permission to do so -- like the namesys people do.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  159. Webmessenger is working... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Working fine from my desktop and my BlackBerry.

  160. New poll idea: by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

    What IM do you use?

    a) MSN Messenger
    b) Yahoo
    c) Trillian
    d) Gaim
    e) None of the above.

    Funny options are left as an exercise to the reader:)

  161. Re:Trillian plain works too by LxDengar · · Score: 1

    Uh, how about so they an afford to pay a programmer to adjust to the next version of Messenger, and offer you a free version (again).

  162. other clients by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    i had kopete running overnight and never logged off... didnt have a problem. once i restarted the client, i couldnt get on. tried amsn... no good. tried gaim... no good.

  163. Re:USE JABBER. BE SAFE FROM MICROSOFT'S EVIL PLANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is OT, but please note when you use Jabber servers not under your control that if you use any of the gateways to other IM services (like the MSN gateway or ICQ gateway), your username and password are stored IN PLAINTEXT in a file on the Jabber server.

    So if you use MSN, the Jabber server administrator can access your passport account etc.

    I was quite shocked to discover this when I set up my own Jabber server instead of using someone elses! :)

  164. trillian 2.0 pro works fine by gblewis · · Score: 0

    i'm on MSN now (oct 16) and tril pro 2.0 is functioning.

  165. Trillian .74 still logging in... by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 0

    Only Yahoo still fails to allow login.

  166. good to the last drop by paraleet · · Score: 1

    If I'm a cow then microsoft is the guy with the milking machine. When is microsoft going to stop looking at us powerusers as a bank account, instead of as a category of clients that deserve not to be bilked any more than the rest of their clientelle?

    --
    LEARNING, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious. A. Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
  167. who cares . stop using msn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    msn is for nazi's

  168. Trillian fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trillian Pro 2.0 still connects just fine

  169. Works fine ... by Vanieter · · Score: 1

    on Debian Unstable's Gaim (0.70) package

  170. That headline by Shmoe · · Score: 1

    reminds me of the old school IRC days, haven't seen the word "kickban" or kb, bk, etc in a very long time.. awesome :)

  171. My feelings on this. by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    They're allowed to close off their network. They own it, and shouldn't have to pay for "alternative" clients that still connect to Microsoft's servers, stealing their bandwidth.

    The thing I do have a problem with though is Microsoft's decision to make it a pain in the ass for inexperienced computer users to not use MSN Messenger. It tries to prevent users from disabling/removing it, depending on what version you have.

  172. P2P model's defects by yerricde · · Score: 1

    why isn't IM a P2P thing?

    Peer-to-peer has a couple problems relating to discovery and communication through firewalls. If a user's IP address changes every two hours, how are other users supposed to locate this user to send messages to him? You need a central server to locate them, whether this server be a DNS server, an IM server, or whatever. And how can communication work between two hosts that cannot accept incoming TCP connections nor receive UDP packets? There has to be a non-firewalled relay, and this is an IM server.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  173. Trillian by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

    Trillian is still working for me.

    I used to get a warning from Micros~1 about needing to patch my IM client due to security concerns, but I clicked the checkbox to deny further messages from them. =)

    --
    Common sense is not so common.
  174. Debian gaim_0.70-2 by Dwonis · · Score: 1
    Upgrading gaim fixed the problem for me, although there seemed to have been some different problems (perhaps unrelated) last night with gaim 0.71/win32.

    dwon@gando:~$ dpkg -s gaim | grep "^Version: "
    Version: 1:0.70-2

  175. MSN Kickbans 3rd Client Users? by Ranma · · Score: 1

    Obviously somebody spends too much time on irc. Ohhhh I know, they could have set the channel to +m, and +v'ed all the MSN clients only. Or maybe they could get an IRCOP to handle things. Just kidding, shizzle my fizzle.

  176. Fire doesn't work, MSN Messenger crashes by a1291762 · · Score: 1

    I don't know why the Fire people haven't updated their MSN protocol stuff since every other IM client I've seen has.

    I'm also getting crashes from MSN Messenger (3.5.1, not to be confused with 3.5 which no longer works since it speaks the old protocol).

    I found a program called JSuperChat that is a Java-based IM that can talk MSN. It was really slow though (perhaps because my machine is a 400Mhz G3).

    I'm in the middle of compiling Psi... hopefully I'll be able to get to MSN from Jabber.

    Link

  177. Re:USE JABBER. BE SAFE FROM MICROSOFT'S EVIL PLANS by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    For the love god, mod this up.. this is informative.
    If I had mod points, I would!

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  178. Re:USE JABBER. BE SAFE FROM MICROSOFT'S EVIL PLANS by panserg · · Score: 1

    that's in case of plaintext xdb. How about xdb_LDAP?

    --
    "I shall explain this by waving my hands about in an appropriate manner." -- Cambridge University Math Dept.
  179. ALERT! MODERATORS ON CRACK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In typical Slashdot tradition, the mods fail to even read the comment. Didn't anyone notice the "Right?" at the bottom of the post?

    Get a grip moderators. Don't moderate when high on crack.

  180. Yes, I noticed this because now... by choke · · Score: 1

    my msn messenger cannot log in.

    This vaguely reminds me of the 'copy protection' that one has to surmount just to get software one pays for to work properly (i.e. Securerom cd's on my 72x cdrom drive).

    Now I am an msn messenger user who is probably going to have to install some sort of workaround to use the service legitimately because it erroneously detects something it doesn't like. I wonder if I am breaking the DMCA now.

    - nox

    --
    "No good deed goes unpunished"
  181. Re:GNU IS NOT ABOUT "FREE SPEECH"! by IonPanel · · Score: 1

    No, you still own the software and can re-license it as you wish, but the GPL license just means that users can modify the code and distribute it freely. It doesn't make it owned by all.

    --
    Dave Bell
  182. Re:I don't buy that argument.. by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    it's not like you can't donate to gAIM

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  183. Re:I don't buy that argument.. by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

    I can donate to gAIM because it's opened source, or I can pay for Trillian because I happy to really like the program.

    Having used both and having paid for just one, maybe that'll tell you which one I personally prefer.

    Relax, though, I spent my money, not yours.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  184. Re:GNU IS NOT ABOUT "FREE SPEECH"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >>That having been said, if you wish to relicense code contributed to your GPL project by others then you have to obtain their permission to do so -- like the namesys people do.

    This is purely for curtousy reasons. There is no legal change in your ownership of the copyright when others contribute to the code, and nothing compulsory about getting the ok of others. Though I'm sure they would appreciate it.
  185. Re:how foolish of you.. by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    dont you understand basic economics?! STOP SPENDING MY MONEY!!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All