Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Take on iTunes for Windows

Skruffy writes "The Register has an amusing article about Microsoft's reaction to the launch of Apple's iTunes software on Windows. It seems that Microsoft is very keen to warn its users of the dangers of using a service that would restrict them from accessing music from other sources... Oh the irony."

588 comments

  1. "Limited Selection" by rmohr02 · · Score: 5, Funny
    [U]sers of iTunes are limited to music from Apple's Music Store.
    No shit! I'm getting rid of iTunes right now!
    1. Re:"Limited Selection" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The thing with Quicktime 4, 5, 6 is the darn slider thing will lock up your system if you keep sliding it around. What good is the slider-thingy if you can't slide it around to hunt for the actual nasty part of the .mov file you downloaded from alt.binaries.multimedia.playboy

      The big litmus test for iTunez will be if the darn slider thing won't hose the entire Windoze environment. I think if Apple can overcome the whole "very pretty but non-functional" problem then they will gain some serious traction amongst all us Windoze gomers. Are you hearing me Jobs, the app must work.

      The whole notion that Windows people are such sophisticates that they care about AAC files or OGG support is just plain silly. Although 128bit artifacts of songs may suck when compared to even the lowly WMA at the same bitrate. The iPod is another really pretty product, but it's darn expensive. Give me a cheap CDR MP3 player and my 14-cent media and I'm off.

  2. What I'm afraid of ... by Dreadlord · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... is that M$ starts a new monopoly on iTunes-like apps, especially that Napster 2 has been launched a while back, isn't this what M$ does all the time?

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
    1. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Lane.exe · · Score: 3, Interesting
      But Napster 2 sucks. There was a review on /. the other day, and the poor reviewer couldn't get his machine to stop crashing when he attempted to open it. Plus, Windoze users seem to have taken to iTunes like a duck to water (my girlfriend is probably buying music right now). iTunes is here to stay, and I wouldn't be surprised if it had a monopoly on pay-for-play services within a year.

      --
      IAALS.
    2. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unless they pull an Internet Explorer and give the software away with Windows (even then, the next version of Windows is years away), I don't see how they could steal users away from Apple's service without actually making their service better than Apple's - which would actually be a great thing. Two huge corporations battling to make music services better and cheaper - nice.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    3. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Dreadlord · · Score: 1

      Automatically installed with a SP or something maybe? Or with the next version of windows media player?

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    4. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, according to the Napster web site Napster 2 is currently still in beta testing anyway. That bug should have been fixed before the software went to Beta, but hopefully it'll get caught (or have already been caught), before the release of the "finished product" on the 29th.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    5. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


      my girlfriend is probably buying music right now

      You read /. and have a girlfriend? Begone, infidel!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    6. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but how many home users actually install service packs or upgrade media player? I'd say at least a good 85% of home Windows users don't even know how to get to Windows update.

      Unless it comes in one of the auto-updates (which I really doubt they'd do), I don't think they'd be able to actually get it to a significant amount of people through an update.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    7. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      The one article you refer to was the installation crashing which uses Install Shield. If the installation was crashing, it is POSSIBLE there was another issue on that machine.

      As for me, it installed fine and works great. I haven't purchased any tracks but I'm happy with the $10 a month for unlimited downloads and playback.

    8. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Talez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plus, Windoze users seem to have taken to iTunes like a duck to water.

      I know I have. I've been spending the past few days sorting and cataloguing my music. Normally I didn't give a shit about ID3 tags but iTunes has changed all of that.

      Its just so insanely powerful and simple. I think most of the Apple bitchers at the moment are having trouble switching from a "Now Playing" style playlist to the library style of iTunes. It eventually grew on me and now I can't live without my Library and my Browse button.

    9. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it will be available w/ Windows Media Player Ver. 12.0 - available for download in Feb. 2004. Oh, and if you're already using Media Player 8x or higher you'll be prompted to download it.

    10. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by kleinux · · Score: 1

      I think this will fail them unlike including IE for one very key difference. Apple already has my CC and I am all setup to buy music. Granted, most computer users don't know what is going on with their computer, they are much more likely to know what is going on with their money.

    11. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Graff · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't see how they could steal users away from Apple's service without actually making their service better than Apple's - which would actually be a great thing. Two huge corporations battling to make music services better and cheaper - nice.

      Yep competition is a good thing. The problem is that when you have a company that is a monopoly in a market and it uses that monopoly position to create a barrier to entry into that market then any other company will find it too difficult to enter into competition.

      Take cars for example. Suppose Ford has a super engine that runs only on fuel made by Ford. Now Fords sell like crazy and take over the market. Years down the road the gas stations only sell Ford fuel because there are so many Ford cars. What are the chances of a new car being made that runs on Ford fuel? None, because Ford engines are the only ones that can. What are the chances that new cars come out that don't run on Ford fuel? None, because there are hardly any service stations that sell non-Ford fuel. The net result? Only Ford cars and Ford fuel are produced.

      Yes, this is a simplistic example and might not be 100% real-world but it does highlight the basics behind monopolies. Right now Microsoft has a monopoly because it is the predominant operating system. If it uses that monopoly to drive out competitors in related markets, say web browsers, then it is abusing its monopolistic position.

      The same thing goes if Microsoft decided to release a security update that breaks Apple's iTunes without telling anyone. Boom, iTunes starts working crappy and people blame Apple when the fault is all Microsoft. Don't think this can't happen, it has happened before with Quicktime. It was shown in internal memos that Quicktime was broken on Windows for a while because Microsoft deliberately changed a few libraries without warning.

      As long as there is fair and open competition the consumer, and the companies, will benefit. If any company is allowed to squash its competition entirely then the consumer will suffer.
    12. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by yomegaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those things have been in Winamp since forever. I'm sitting here right now staring at the library manager, it has a three-pane view of artist-album-track, and a search field. I use it all of the time, in fact I don't have a single playlist file anywhere. I used iTunes a lot when my Mac was working, and I still think Winamp is a lot handier, it can be collapsed to take up very little screen space yet still expanded and/or controlled with just a few keystrokes.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    13. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Talez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They've been in Winamp 3 but not in Winamp 2. Winamp 3 just felt like a three toed sloth on Valium while iTunes runs at a fair clip sorting through my 3,000 or so songs quite quickly. Hopefully those issues will be sorted in WA5 (currently in beta) but I don't think I'll be trying it anytime soon.

      I won't argue with you on the very little screen space. Minimode takes up more space than WA's windowshade mode but at 1280x1024 it doesn't really bother me that much.

      Winamp 3 was a good rough and ready solution for those people that needed it now but iTunes is far more elegant (and pretty, IMHO) solution.

    14. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well i still say media player 6.4 was the best windows media polayer period. there is no need to upgrade it.

      and for those windows people that don't know, it is installed on every windows platform i know of. choose start run "mplayer2" and your good to go

    15. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      Apple needs to work a deal with Sony, Dell, and that hip new HP company with the hot CEO and bundle iTunes, and maybe like thirty bucks of "iTunes money" with new PCs.

      Didn't the OEMs get the right to add whatever they wanted on the desktop under one of the many Microsoft settlements?

    16. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by DrPascal · · Score: 1

      The Media Library was backported to the 2.9x series of WinAmp. Give it a shot.

      --
      DrPascal: Not the language, the mathematician.
    17. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      Right, that's what I'm using. I don't like Winamp3 either, for some reason if you tell it to play an entire album it doesn't sort the tracks by track number, at least I couldn't get it to do it. WTF?

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    18. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " But Napster 2 sucks. There was a review on /. the other day, and the poor reviewer couldn't get his machine to stop crashing when he attempted to open it."

      It's amzing how effective /. FUD is. Someone finds the worst review of Napster possible, gets it posted on /., and everyone thinks the program is unstable because 1 person had problems with a beta copy. I guess the new Linux kernel must suck by the same reasoning.

    19. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Do you know any way for iTunes to automagically recognize filenames and create ID3 tags from them?

      All my MP3s are either Artist - Song.mp3 or Composer - Performer - Piece.mp3.

      A solution that is simple and works under windows or linux would be nice...

    20. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      He means he's surfing the iTMS, and moving the mouse with his right hand...

    21. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out tag&rename - let's you enter id3 tags from filenames. very nice. and worth the $$ too.

    22. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Those things have been in Winamp since forever. I'm sitting here right now staring at the library manager, it has a three-pane view of artist-album-track, and a search field. I use it all of the time, in fact I don't have a single playlist file anywhere. I used iTunes a lot when my Mac was working, and I still think Winamp is a lot handier, it can be collapsed to take up very little screen space yet still expanded and/or controlled with just a few keystrokes.

      Sure Winamp has the Library function, Alt-L, which works just fine for finding specific artists, genres, or albums in your library. I used to use Winamp exclusively as my player, but iTunes has all this and more. It allows you to rank all of your tracks with 1 to 5 stars. Once you get a good number of your tracks ranked, the Smart Playlists functionality is awesome. Now I can create a playlist that says "Only play songs ranked 4 stars or better that I haven't listened to in the past two weeks, and pick 25 at random." This playlist updates itself so the end result is I'm always hearing music I haven't listened to in a while, and I'm always hearing good music.

      Not only that, but this functionality works on my iPod as well, synchronizing the XML databases where this information is stored effortlessly between my computer and my iPod.

      Don't get me wrong, Winamp is a great media player, but it's Library Management functions don't even compare to iTunes.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    23. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      ...iTunes has changed all of that. Its just so insanely powerful and simple.
      Yeah, yeah, it's insanely great. But they aren't paying you a CEO's salary to astroturf slashdot, so get back to work Steve!
    24. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      For the lazy, the AC is talking about Tag&Rename

      Thank you, AC!

    25. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sister makes her own webpages (edits the html in notepad), and yet she doesn't know how to run windows update. And I've explained it to her too. She's very bright, so it's not like she's too dumb to understand. But there's something about upgrading software that makes people's eyes glaze over.

      That's why I've concluded the only way for updating to work as a strategy to keeping your stuff safe is that if the machine updates itself automatically by default. Ofcourse, this would involve MS never, ever, releasing a patch that breaks something again, and that doesn't seem very likely (OK, debian can do it, but MS is no debian).

    26. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by hamisht · · Score: 1
      Yes, this is a simplistic example and might not be 100% real-world

      You haven't posted here before, have you?

    27. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone remember the story where microsoft windows 3.1 would display bogus error messages if DR-DOS was detected. There actually was no technical problem at all, bu the messages caused enough FUD that people stuck with MS-DOS.

      Master wouldn't try to hurt us would he?

    28. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      Score the parent (-1, Car Analogy) please.

    29. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Talez · · Score: 1

      Do you have the track number in the ID3 tag. Otherwise it probably won't play in order.

    30. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by the+web · · Score: 1

      But they aren't paying you a CEO's salary to astroturf slashdot, so get back to work Steve!

      Um...he gets paid a dollar a year.

      --
      __
      Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
    31. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... ALL restaurants are Taco Bell!!

    32. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I misspoke in using the word "salary," but his total pay is nothing to sneeze at! And a $90e6 personal jet ain't a bad perk either.

    33. Re:What I'm afraid of ... by the+web · · Score: 1

      I jest of course.

      --
      __
      Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
  3. OR by da3dAlus · · Score: 3, Funny

    "from the doesn't-play-well-with-others dept."
    or
    "from the I'm-taking-my-toys-and-going-home dept."

    What a bunch of babies.

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
  4. More Microsoft FUD by stanmann · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I didn't know that Itunes couldn't import my mp3's and make playlists, guess it's back to Realjukebox...

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    1. Re:More Microsoft FUD by FrEaK7782 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this was supposed to be a joke or not. But either way, you can import your mp3's. I know I did. You can also convert them to AAC. While I haven't bothered burning anything, I assume all AAC files would burn properly.

    2. Re:More Microsoft FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that sarcasm?

    3. Re:More Microsoft FUD by stanmann · · Score: 1

      IT was supposed to be a joke... The article quoted microsoft as claiming that Itunes could only use music files from the apple music store... I guess that's what I get for reading the FA.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    4. Re:More Microsoft FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF you can't tell, you shouldn't be reading slashdot. In fact, you shouldn't be allowed on the interweb unsupervised.

    5. Re:More Microsoft FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Actually sarcasm is a quite useless literary tool here. I would say 9/10 scribblings of good satire are modded down with a few jackasses replying how the guy is wrong and they are right. Yep...this is Slashdot.

  5. Of course microsoft would say that by bodrick · · Score: 1

    I mean they are the biggest controlling monopoly there is ;)

    1. Re:Of course microsoft would say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I mean they are the biggest controlling monopoly there is ;)

      Oh wow. Thank you Mr. Obvious. ;-)

  6. OK... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But how does iTunes restrict you from obtaining music from other sources? I can go to a concert. I can listen to the radio. I can play my own music. I can go to the record store. I can even use Kazaa. How is iTunes restricting me?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:OK... by moehoward · · Score: 1

      Really? You can listen to the radio? Try one of the 128k stations. Total crap even with massive bandwidth. Worthless.

      Heck, even the 28k stations are horrible compared to what I listen to through Media Player 9.

      iTunes restricts what you can do with what you buy. You have fewer rights with iTunes than with buying CDs, although the cost is roughly the same. It will only take you a few minutes of education to burst your bubble.

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    2. Re:OK... by rockhome · · Score: 1

      I think they are restricting you in what hardware your downloaded songs will play on, but that is a pretty thin argument really. It sort of glosses over the fact that the iPod is a seriously cool, useful, and attractive device.

    3. Re:OK... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're misunderstanding Microsoft's claim. They're saying that by using iTunes to rip CDs [to AAC] or the Apple Music Store [to purchase AAC files] you are limiting your ability to use those files [since they not only contain DRM, but cannot be played in some software or on some MP3 portable devices].

      The logical fallacy is that iTunes can of course play AAC [negating the concern about playing the files on your computer], and that iTunes is actually a sales-device for the iPod which of course can play AAC.

      What's more ironic, and is being stated by several people already, is that all of Microsoft's efforts at distributing music [i.e. as partners with music distributing sites] involve the use of WMA format and DRM. Those files, of course, are no more useable than AAC, not to mention the particular point that WMA is not compatible with the iPod.

      What it comes down to is this: there is a true dividing line between the Apple music scene [i.e. AAC/iPod/iTunes] and the Microsoft music scene [i.e. WMA/Napster 2.0/Media Player], and Microsoft isn't happy that the Apple side is beating them.

      That said, I'm still using windows...just also using iTunes with my iPod, and purchasing AAC music.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    4. Re:OK... by stanmann · · Score: 5, Informative

      But Ripped AAC don't contain DRM, only downloaded AAC from the Apple music store..., and Itunes can Rip MP3 as well...

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    5. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It restricts you in that you can only purchase AAC stuff from iTMS and only use the AAC music that you purchased directly with an iPod. Use with any other portable requires playlist -> burn CD -> re rip without DRM -> move to player. PITA. Several models from several manufacturers (Creative, Rio, Dell and Samsung coming soon) support WMA directly, so you don't go through any hassle or quality loss just to get the music on your player. And that's the format used by basically everyone OTHER than Apple.

      That's if your computer still boots after you install iTunes and it doesn't crash while your downloading music or trying to burn a CD. read the horror stories here.

    6. Re:OK... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey, I'm not supporting Microsoft's argument, just trying to explain it. As I said, I think Microsoft is at best criticizing Apple for precisely what they [microsoft] are doing, just because Apple is doing it better.

      Incidentally, as to circumventing the AAC DRM: if you burn to a CD [which you can do unlimited times with AAC files] you can then re-rip it to either DRM -free AAC files or MP3 or whatever. Obvioulsy, a loss of quality incurred whenever you recompress, but from my tests thus far [going from 128 AAC > CD > 128 AAC or 192 MP3] I've yet to notice any actual difference [although file size sometimes varies].

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    7. Re:OK... by Atryn · · Score: 1

      I know this may be shocking for some high-tech folks but I believe he was saying he could listen to the RADIO not to a streaming media service calling itself radio.

      In other words, having iTunes does not in any way "limit" his ability to use other means of obtaining music. It merely provides the convenience of obtaining music in a user-friendly environment for use on a limited set of devices.

      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    8. Re:OK... by quigonn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have fewer rights with iTunes than with buying CDs

      Not of you burn them onto a CD and rip them again. And that is the major difference between Apple and Microsoft: Apple provides a legal way to "circumvent" DRM when the user is willing to spend some time to burn a CD and rip it again. That is real fair use, IMHO.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    9. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You young 'uns might not remember ancient technology, but some of us old farts still have actual real FM radios that can tune into and amplify real FM radio stations that still play music. It's based on radio wave propogation and analogue technology, which I know might sound scary to you kids, but believe me it does actually work!

      Unless iTunes comes with its own software based FM frequency blocking software, that is.

    10. Re:OK... by EricWright · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...yet with iTMS, you have far MORE rights than you do with any other major online music purchasing site. The whole point is that the masses want a method of buying music without either a) going to the store and dropping change for a physical disc, or b) buying a CD online and waiting 1-7 days for delivery.

      The iTMS restrictions are a) no more than 10 burns of a playlist containing an iTMS track (fine, make a different playlist), b) sharing iTMS tracks with no more than 3 (or is it 5) other computers on your local network, c) no sharing over external networks, d) no direct conversion to another format (gotta burn to disc, then re-rip in another format). What about that is so awful? No, it doesn't allow for wholesale piracy, I mean sharing. Yes, the tracks are in protected AAC/MPEG4 format. How is this better/worse from protected WMA format? Have you looked at the restrictions on tracks from buymusic.com? Many (most? all?) of the other sites restrict your use of the purchased tracks to the machine to which you originally downloaded the tracks. That's it...

      Checking a select few sites:

      napster.com (pressplay.com is a redirect here) requires Windows, requires IE5+, requires WMP7+.

      buymusic.com requires IE5+ and Windows (not using IE, I don't get any further than that requirement page... I'm sure WMP is required).

      iTMS requires iTunes. Now, there is no restriction to Mac only, and an external browser is not needed at all. This seems less restrictive than other sites (fine, bitch all you want about no linux/*BSD/etc. support).

      I do wish the quality was a bit higher, since the price of an full iTMS album is relatively similar to the price of a CD, but it's a trade off. You get (almost) what you want, when you want it, and you have more control over iTMS tracks than any legally downloadable music.

    11. Re:OK... by moehoward · · Score: 1

      Please provide a link to something saying that the circumvention is "legal". I suspect you are in murky waters if you do such a thing.

      Anyway, isn't that just security through obscurity? Aren't we slashdotters trained to spite such means? Where is your outrage and disgust at AAPL for using such measures?

      I call "double standard" on you!

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    12. Re:OK... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Those files, of course, are no more useable than AAC

      Not really - there are FAR FAR more MP3 players out there that support WMA than there are that support AAC. Every new player that I've seen has had WMA support, but I don't think I've ever seen one besides the iPod that's had AAC support.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    13. Re:OK... by stanmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      See the COngressional ruling IRT Betamax and time/media shifting... It it "legal" for me to record TV shows on my computer, it is not "legal" for me to download the same show from the interweb while watching it on TV.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    14. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Moe,

      Your check's in the mail...

      -Bill

    15. Re:OK... by kalidasa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which is curious, considering the fact that the AAC format is an industry standard, while the WMA format is purely a Microsoft format.

    16. Re:OK... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Granted, I don't listen to a ton of online radio, there are a couple stations I listen to, though I don't do it that often. Anyway, when I do listen, quality seems fine. I tend to listen to the same streams (or similar in content) at work in WMP (though soon will be using iTunes) and at home on the iBook in iTunes. I don't notice much of a difference, other than WMP tends to have more buffering hiccups, and the apps it self is a lot more bloated.

      iTunes restricts what you can do with what you buy. You have fewer rights with iTunes than with buying CDs, although the cost is roughly the same. It will only take you a few minutes of education to burst your bubble.

      What do you expect? Yes, it'd be great if iTMS or similar systems gave you a regular, unDRM'd MP3, like eMusic. But most don't. It doesn't change the fact that Apple's attempt is the best one out there yet, in theory and implementation. I like eMusic, though not so much anymore, after the buyout.

      $10 for a CD worth of music in iTunes, vs $15-18 for a CD. "Roughly" the same price indeed, if a 50-80% increase is "roughly" equal to you.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    17. Re:OK... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      All the music from iTunes store allows you to burn the downloaded music to cd, using the iTunes software. This isn't exactly circumvention, unless you use the feature to distribute the music to others. But it is definatly legal (as long as you don't distribute the cds or rips of the cds).
      Oh yea you wanted a link.. ok.
      http://www.apple.com/itunes/store/
      "the iTunes Music Store lets you quickly find, purchase and download the music you want for just 99 per song. You can burn songs onto an unlimited number of CDs for your personal use, listen to songs on an unlimited number of iPods and play songs on up to three Macintosh computers or Windows PCs"

    18. Re:OK... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      It merely provides the convenience of obtaining music in a user-friendly environment for use on a limited set of devices.

      Huh? Either there is only one device, the iPod, or the range is unlimited because you can burn the file to a CD-- which then gives you all the same freedom you experience with other CDs. In fact, given the recent trend towards attempting to corrupt the CD standard to prevent ripping, the burned CD actually gives you more freedom than buying from a store in many cases.

      All this said, I see no reason to support a proprietary software product from either Microsoft or Apple, no reason to buy music in a form that contains DRM, and no reason not to stick with my legal 60GB of mp3s obtained from ripping my private CD collection, ripping borrowed CDs from friends and the library (I should think this is legal, anyway-- if taping those CDs would be legal, then ripping to mp3 ought to be legal as well, no?) and emusic.com (RIP).

      --
      I do not have a signature
    19. Re:OK... by rkilstrom · · Score: 1

      I have seen a few car audio CD/MP3 decks as of late that have begun including WMA support. I haven't noticed too many car CD/MP3 decks that state they will play AAC. This boosts usability for WMA over AAC. You can just burn your WMAs to CD-R and play them in your car without your portable MP3 player.

      It would be nice to see AAC be included as a format as well. But it seems Microsoft reached them first. Hopefully it will be added soon as I prefer AAC over WMA.

    20. Re:OK... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but with the vast majority of people using Microsoft as their desktop OS and a bunch of clueless people using media player to rip their CDs into WMA format, WMA is pretty much a must-have. How many people do you know that rip into AAC or go on Kazaa to download the latest album in AAC format?

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    21. Re:OK... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Hell- in some ways, don't you have *more* rights with iTMS purchased music? I refer to sharing and streaming of music- the statement is that you can only share music with the other computers on your network- you're not afforded that right with CDs. Most peolpe would do it anyway, but ripping and sharing is usually prohibited.

      And the sharing system in iTunes is slick as hell. No setup, no play list maintenence on the web or requesting songs from the bot- it's just like you have the entire library within your own iTunes.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    22. Re:OK... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that Apple is stuck - they have to license WMA from Microsoft if they are to have a successful product, because clusers are stupid enough to download and rip WMA instead of MP3?

    23. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll rip if I feel like it. I will patch bochs to save sound output to a file.

    24. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the only thing I'm saying is that WMA is a far more common audio format than AAC.

    25. Re:OK... by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      And, of course, because we live in a frozen moment of time in a snapshot universe, this will never, ever change.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    26. Re:OK... by BinxBolling · · Score: 1
      You have fewer rights with iTunes than with buying CDs, although the cost is roughly the same.

      The cost might be roughly the same in dollars, but it's certainly not the same in time and trouble.

    27. Re:OK... by Technician · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Both Apple and MS are using something other than industry standard MP3's making both incompatible with both my car and my portable. I guess I'm stuck with the shiny silver disks and my favorite ripping program.

      Too bad the industry doesn't get it that it is possible to sell high quality MP3's from a reliable quality source and compete with free. The bottled water industry gets it. They compete well against tap water. The music industry doesn't get it. Bottled water is drinkable out of the bottle or in your favorite glass. DRM files are not playable in my car or my portable player. Sombody please release a quality compatable & reliable pure source.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    28. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Several models from several manufacturers (Creative, Rio, Dell and Samsung coming soon) support WMA directly, so you don't go through any hassle or quality loss just to get the music on your player. And that's the format used by basically everyone OTHER than Apple.

      So you are saying that Apple is the ONLY one who supports relatively a format based on open standards (AAC is an open standard, WMA is MS proprietary) with less restrictive DRM than is found with most WMA sources. Sounds like you just made a great case for going with iTunes and iPod!

    29. Re:OK... by moehoward · · Score: 1

      Nice try. No, where does it tell you to rip it back in any format you want after you burn it?

      Oh, yeah. Right. It doesn't. You just decided to make up a "fact" that it was legally OK to do so.

      Please try again. This time, put some ooomph into it!

      And, please address the security via obscurity issue as well, while you're at it. I love zealotous rationalization!

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    30. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are going to add version numbers to try and make it seem like microsoft is really more restrictive (as you have to have other software installed and at particular versions), May I also pointlessly add some for iTunes? In which case you need iTunes 4+ (how is this different than needing WMP9 to play your protected files?) and Quicktime X+ (just another prerequisite, so you can actually play the files).

    31. Re:OK... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      show me where it says that you should rip a CD bought in a store to any format you like dumb-ass.

      here is a fact. you can do it, so why the fuck are you bitching about it?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    32. Re:OK... by infiniti99 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And you don't necessarily need to recompress to a lossy format. For instance, AAC -> WAV -> Ogg FLAC would retain as much quality as you purchased. The Apple DRM is essentially non-existent.

      It appears the only real problem with the service is that you can't buy a higher-quality song that would be better for ripping to your own lossy format (or that Apple doesn't simply supply Vorbis/MP3 in the first place). But this is a problem of quality, not DRM.

    33. Re:OK... by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      I was hoping this would be the case -- since the M4P file is burned to CD using a decoder which (hopefully) shares a lot of code with the same encoder you rip the CD to M4A (AAC) with, one would think that the "same" bits are ignored and so you don't get the 'double-loss'. I'm not sure about ripping to MP3, but going from 128 AAC to CD and back to 128 AAC seems like you might not encounter any additional loss.

      Of course, since I've only bought 2 songs from iTunes so far I haven't tried the "technique" yet. And I'm not sure I'm going to stick with iTunes, since it doesn't play my (fairly large) collection of ripped CDs in OGG format, and I don't really want to rip all my CDs in yet again another format.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    34. Re:OK... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I can get iTunes to work on Windows and Mac.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    35. Re:OK... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      awww. iTunes sucks, I want to use it with my totally obscure 128 MB flash based mp3 player I got from a cereal box top.

      or:

      dude, the iPod costs to damn much and I am an ignorant pud because I believe the crap that it can only be used to play AAC files and that iTunes can only encode and play AAC and I think the Nomad is so much better (forget the fact it costs more for a crappier device)

      those are the main arguments.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    36. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when you rip a file to WMV, you are relying on the goodwill of MS to let you continue listening to your music. Worthless.

      Get a clue.

    37. Re:OK... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      WMA has been around in end users hands for about 4 years...AAC...about a year and a half.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    38. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to rip to AAC in iTunes. Go to Edit > Preferences > Importing, and you can select from AAC, MP3, AIFF, or WAV.

      Unless you're purchasing from their Music Store (which I haven't tried, not in the US), there's no need to bother with the AAC format at all.

    39. Re:OK... by EricWright · · Score: 1

      Just copying the information from the websites... yes, you are restricted in the s/w you can use to play protected tracks, but you are given far more rights with iTMS downloaded tracks than other services offer. Instead of picking nits, make valid counter-arguments... nope... didn't think so.

      My point was you only have 1 choice of OS (more options with iTMS, and no, WinME, WinXP, Win2K, etc. don't count as more than one choice) and you only have 1 choice of browser (no browser required at all with iTMS) with the PC only services.

    40. Re:OK... by moehoward · · Score: 1

      I'm bitching about the "obscurity" copy protection scheme.

      I wrote my "bitching" in English, if you care to attempt to read it.

      But I appreciate the name calling. It says a lot about you and makes me feel smugly superior.

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    41. Re:OK... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It is not actually circumvention. It will not be circumvention unless Apple alters iTunes to produce copy-protected CDs. Nonetheless the right to reproduce a work is included in fair use laws, which state that you may make unlimited copies for personal use, provided that when you sell the original, you destroy or transfer all copies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    42. Re:OK... by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      They're saying that by using iTunes to rip CDs [to AAC] or the Apple Music Store [to purchase AAC files] you are limiting your ability to use those files

      The thing is, you can make exactly the same argument with respect to Microsoft Office. If, for example, I write a paper with MS Word, then my ability to use that file with other word processors is limited unless I first convert it to some other format. And honestly, it's a valid point, because I really hate it when people mail me important files in Word format assuming that everyone on the planet uses Word.

      On the flip side, though, AAC is relatively open. Microsoft is not likely to give its competitors a copy of the Word file format spec, but you can go out and buy a copy of the AAC spec if you want to.

      Even if AAC is a problem for you because your player doesn't support it, or you just don't like it, or whatever, you can still use iTunes as a bang-up music app, and just stick any of the many other formats that QuickTime supports, mp3 and Ogg included.

    43. Re:OK... by selfsealingstembolt · · Score: 1

      There is no unbeatable DRM.

      As long as you can listen to the music, you can also redirect it to the optical out of your sound card. You connect tho opt-out with opt-in, and set your favourite recording application to listen to opt-in.

      I have used optical to transfer music to minidiscs. Back then there were no USB-pluggable minidisc-players. But mine had optical in/out and so recording was possible (and near loss-less). The only problem is the speed, which is always 1x.
      But if you are converting your collection of DRM'd music, you can stream all songs in one playlist through. In one or two weeks you could get through...

      --
      Keep open minded - but not that open your brain falls out...
    44. Re:OK... by unclebulgaria · · Score: 1

      $10? I'm under the impression most CD's contain 12 tracks, making it a few cents under $12.

    45. Re:OK... by Royul · · Score: 1

      You can just burn your AAC or MP3's in iTunes to either an audio CD or MP3 CD and play on ANY current car CD stereo. You see MP3 is the MOST supported format when compared to fringe WMA. OR, you can transfer your tunes (thousands) to your iPOD and use FM frequency to transport AAC/MP3/WAV tunes to anything with an FM tuner. You can play your custom playlists, and, one of the great strengths of the iPOD - create new playlists on the go from the player. My point is, is that CDR's are quickly becoming obsolete (already for me) for tranporting/portable music.

    46. Re:OK... by phyrestang · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm curious about this. Can you, instead of burning to CD and ripping back to MP3, just convert the MP3 to WAV and back to MP3?

    47. Re:OK... by jhines0042 · · Score: 1

      Question...

      can you burn to a virutal CD Rom?

      For example, can you burn to an image and the rip from an image so as to avoid the time/cost of a actual physical CD?

      Like this software here... it can't be too far away.

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    48. Re:OK... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Informative
      While AAC still requires license, it is listed under ISO standard 14496-3. I should also point out that Linux users can use AAC files, since there are a number of open source projects out there. Searching sourceforge.net and freshmeat.net will turn up a few. To save you a bit of the leg work, here are some: It should also be noted that AAC is part of MPEG 4, so it could be said that AAC is ro MPEG 4 what MP3 is to MPEG 1.
      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    49. Re:OK... by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      Get the Ogg QuickTime component. It will allow iTunes to play Ogg Vorbis stuff.

    50. Re:OK... by Jord · · Score: 1
      Do a search around the net. There are a couple of plug-ins that allow iTunes on the Mac to play Ogg. I am sure the windows version will not be very far behind.

      Here is one example of a Itunes Ogg Vorbis decoder.

    51. Re:OK... by snuffdiddy23 · · Score: 1

      you are very right. when steve jobs was preaching about fair use he went to great lengths to explan that you received a broad scope of rights with the music that are virtually identical to buying a cd. unlimited ipods, two computers, unlimited cd burns (must reorder playlist every ten cd burns, should not affect anyone). i suppose there would really never be any sense in ripping again, considering you could burn at as many times as you want, back up the actually AAC and burn it anytime you please, just as if you own the cd. in that respect it is much better, considering if you scratch a cd you end up with a scratched cd if you did not back it up beforehand and are out $12-20 bucks.

      there is no circumvention of the DRM at all. it works great and prevent you from downloading the AAC's that apple offers. you will be hard pressed to find them, but on the same token you and a friend could team up on a huge arsenal of music and share the cost without the DRM getting in your way. broad spectrum of rights with the AAC and iTMS, much better than whatever windows had before in Rhapsody or whatever else was out. i would not use Real or WiMP codecs even if my iPod could take them or i could somehow circumvent DRM to get them there. they sound awful and AAC sounds worlds better than mp3, which is what your best bet would have been before iTMS came out.

    52. Re:OK... by Laur · · Score: 1
      Nonetheless the right to reproduce a work is included in fair use laws, which state that you may make unlimited copies for personal use, provided that when you sell the original, you destroy or transfer all copies.

      Woah there, care to point to where fair use allows you to make "unlimited copies for personal use?" I'm reading Title 17, Chapter 1 and I don't see that.

      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
    53. Re:OK... by discstickers · · Score: 1

      Most albums are only $9.99. If there's less than 10 tracks, it'll be less. Some albums are over 9.99, but they usually aren't $.99 per track.

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    54. Re:OK... by overbom · · Score: 1

      If you wouldn't mind, wake us up when the ipod supports flac. I'm going to go take a nap.

      Thanks in advance,
      Rip Van Winkle

    55. Re:OK... by tshak · · Score: 1

      AFAIK iTunes requires IE6+. iTunes is just a friendly interface around a web browser, and that browser is IE on Windows. Ironically, if MS removes IE from Windows, it would break Apples software.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    56. Re:OK... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Cost compared to CD depends on whether you want the whole album or just one or to songs. So much for your bubble.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    57. Re:OK... by bonius_rex · · Score: 1
      Can't you also burn an audio CD from AAC files?
      So what's to stop me from downloading a song from Itunes, burning it to CD, and re-ripping it to MP3?
      Then, I can put it in my non-ipod MP3 player.

      Am I missing something here?

    58. Re:OK... by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      but you are given far more rights with iTMS downloaded tracks than other services offer. Instead of picking nits, make valid counter-arguments... nope... didn't think so

      Huh? You talked about less restriction in the software required for d/ling suddenly you're talking about the DRM of the tracks. *You* say that iTMS is less restrictive so *you* have to prove it not the other way round

      My point was you only have 1 choice of OS (more options with iTMS, and no, WinME, WinXP, Win2K, etc. don't count as more than one choice)

      When I downloaded iTunes for Windows (didn't test it yet, I'm running Linux currently) Apple only offered downloads for XP/2k so 98/ME compatability *is* effectivly an additional choice as Apple apparently doesn't support it

      and you only have 1 choice of browser (no browser required at all with iTMS) with the PC only services.

      A browser which comes with every version of Windows and is installed on nearly every system supported by the software of the music store while being available for the few systems which don't have it, free of charge of course. iTunes on the other hand is so big, the competition could bundle the browser with their software and they'd still have smaller downloads

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    59. Re:OK... by Snocone · · Score: 1

      How many people do you know that rip into AAC

      Well, there's a million more since last week, less those that reset iTune's default rip settings...

    60. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i guess this is a good kick in the ass to the "we mill keep everything so it only works on windows department"

      for years microsoft has developed codecs and other media technoligy that would only work on windows with no plans to port this to other platforms. they marketed it as the next big thing and you had to get windows to have it work.

      now this has bite them in the ass whenn apple took a successful line and actually made it work on other platforms. i find this ingenuise. the attitude switching from you have to use my os to make it work to stay with what you want we will still provide a great product.

      of course this is a more level and fair playing ground and microsoft doesn't really know how to handle it. apple has enough resources and clought to stop the usual monopolistic tactics microsoft uses and they know it. i bet if they would make thier drm codecs and such availible to other platforms then microsoft could have been in the same position.

      now the benefit is that if windows users like this they might be app to try using the mac platform as well. that is if it continues to be stable and provide what the custumer considers a worthwile experience.

    61. Re:OK... by snuffdiddy23 · · Score: 1

      i think that the DRM that apple is offering is being misinterpreted. you can convert the AAC however you want as part of the broad spectrum of rights you receive with it, which is not a misfunction of the DRM. you still won't be using an iTMS AAC from the internet that your are not authorized to use, so it is fuctioning marvelously.

      just as you can rip your own cd into the format you choose you can use your AAC's in the same way. it is a great format with excellent rights.

      i think with the AAC you still do better than you would to buy a cd, rip it yourself with whatever you are under the impression to be the best format for your choices and use it. an iTunes Music Storebought AAC is not simply a ripped cd, but a conversion from the digital master, often times remastered to sound better than the same selection that is offered at your local music store. you may be slightly better off to use a cd if you never plan on using it in a compressed format or for some reason do not want to use either macinbytes or windows platforms, but otherwise i think AAC is the way to go.

    62. Re:OK... by shotfeel · · Score: 5, Informative

      iTunes restricts what you can do with what you buy

      Can we please get our terminology straight so people like me at least have a chance of understanding the arguments?

      iTunes is a program used for listening to and organizing music on a computer.

      The iTunes Music Store or iTMS is a service which sells music in an standards compliant format (AAC) wrapped up with a proprietary (FairPlay) DRM scheme.

      Thus iTunes does not restrict anything and can be used with several different audio formats and transcode between many of them. The iTMS sells music with some restrictions that are easily worked-around.

    63. Re:OK... by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you don't know Jack. My system has IE 5.0, unpatched, un-upgraded and never used. iTunes runs just fine. Why the hell would Apple use IE when they already have a powerful browser of their own that they can use without a lisence from anybody?

      If you are going to make shit up, at least try to be reasonable about it.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    64. Re:OK... by spuke4000 · · Score: 1

      I have a question about this: if you are going to circumvent the DRM any way, why not just use Kazaa or whatever and get the song for free?

      I think iTunes is attractive because it's legit, but is there another reason you'd use it to get your 'illegal' music (using the term illegal loosely to indicate violating the terms of the Apple license)? Quality? Convenience? Just like giving Apple money?

      --
      This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
    65. Re:OK... by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      Well, musicmatch is very similar to iTunes, but replace Apple DRM file format with MSFT DRM file format... both can burn to CD. One benefit is musicmatch uses a higher bit rate for their songs. Personally I wish the only DRM protection on anything was an embedded url you could click to pay the rights holders if you haven't already. Also it'd be nice if all formats played on all devices.

    66. Re:OK... by AirP · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something? Burn to CD then rip to mp3, what's wrong with just going to the burning panel in iTunes and selecting MP3 as the CD format to burn? Are people not looking at the options or is the mp3 format just really low quality?

    67. Re:OK... by tshak · · Score: 1

      If I give you the benefit of the doubt, the best I could give you is that it requires IE5 and not 6. It still requires IE. And MS doesn't require a license - that's what's nice about the "integrated" browser in Windows. Anyone can integrate IE into their app for no charge.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    68. Re:OK... by unother · · Score: 1

      Moan, gripe, complain... Look. How do you think Apple was able to provide all of this music in the first place? Easy--if it plays ball. The DRM is not there because of Apple, but because of the recording companies. Any fool can get around it (if they so choose) by burning songs to CD, then ripping freely. And if Joe Six-Pack can't do that, well, that is precisely what DRM was meant to do--keep it from being simple. Oh and FYI--home-taping was seen as a Bad Thing, once upon a time, as well. IIRC all tapes have a "pirate tax" on them, thanks to the recording industry. IOW, it is not legal to make any copy of your music. That it is done, and accepted, commonly says a lot about those efforts to squelch it from days of yore...

    69. Re:OK... by feldsteins · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...by using iTunes to rip CDs [to AAC] or the Apple Music Store [to purchase AAC files] you are limiting your ability to use those files [since they not only contain DRM, but cannot be played in some software or on some MP3 portable devices].

      Not to beat a dead horse here, but some are bound to mis-understand this. It sounds as if you're saying "if you rip your own CDs using iTunes the resulting files are a) DRM'd and b) unplayable in anything but an iPod. That is, of course, wrong on both counts. Nothing's preventing you from ripping your CDs as MP3s. Nothing's preventing you from putting those files on anything that will play them. The files are in no way copy protected.

      Even if you for reasons of efficiency choose to rip the files from your CD collection as AAC (.m4a I think) they aren't "protected" or "restricted" in any way. The problem you'd run into is one of practicality: neither your car stereo manufacturer nor your portable mp3 player manufacturer have licensed MPEG4 technology for their devices and thus cannot play the files. At present, the only external device capable of doing so is Apple's iPod. In principle, nothing's stopping any one from licensing this technology from the mpeg group. That is, in fact, what they want I'm sure. One supposes that if the iTMS remains a leader in legit music downloads other players will jump on board to be able to play the format. ...all of Microsoft's efforts at distributing music [i.e. as partners with music distributing sites] involve the use of WMA format and DRM. Those files, of course, are no more useable than AAC...

      I'm betting they're considerably less usable. All of the previous models used to do legal music downloads have resulted in severely restricted files which are often a) rented, not sold b) literallly unplayable in any player besides the designated one c) unburnable or burnable in a very limited way, sometimes even requiring an extra fee. I think there has been one lonely exception to that rule and in that case the service was pimping independent "never heard of 'em" artists who were much more afraid of obscurity than of piracy.

      --
      You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
    70. Re:OK... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Those files, of course, are no more useable than AAC

      Not really - there are FAR FAR more MP3 players out there that support WMA than there are that support AAC.

      Is anybody actually using the WMA support in those devices, though? I have a Rio Volt SP90 which supports WMA, but all I've ever played on it are MP3s and red-book CDs.

      These days, though, my preferred player is a Palm Tungsten T running AeroPlayer. It supports MP3 and Ogg Vorbis. It plays neither WMA nor AAC. Given that AACs purchased from the iTunes Music Store can be burned in red-book format to a CD-RW and ripped to MP3 or Ogg and given that you most likely don't have this capability with any of the services that use WMA, Microsoft's argument doesn't carry much water with me. Hell, I'd be surprised if DRM'd WMA files would play on the Rio Volt anyway.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    71. Re:OK... by Rich0 · · Score: 1
      You are somewhat correct. The parent poster UNDERSTATED his rights to make copies.

      Legally in the case of audio recordings you don't have to destroy or transfer all copies when you sell the original. I'm reading Title 17, Chapter 10, S 1008.

      No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings.


      Note that title means ALL of title 17 - which means that under the conditions listed in this section, copyright is unenforcable.

      It's called the American Home Recording Act - and it says that with certain limitations you can copy music as much as you want using standard consumer-grade equipment provided that no money is made in the process.
    72. Re:OK... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      They aren't MP3 format. And no, it won't convert to WAV. In theory if you made a CD-R emulator that dumped a .iso file you could get the WAV data without wasting a platter.

      I'm skeptical about the ability to re-encode to MP3. This certainly can be done, but you'd probably lose a LOT of quality. Lossy compression systems toss some "unnecessary" detail to reduce file size. The problem is that different algorithms have different definitions of "unnecessary". If you compess, decompress, and recompress you toss all the data which EITHER algorithm deems unnecessary - which can get noticable very quickly.

    73. Re:OK... by pjrc · · Score: 1
      instead of burning to CD and ripping back to MP3, just convert the MP3 to WAV and back to MP3?

      Replacing AAC->CD->MP3 with MP3->WAV->MP3 would be quite a feat, since Apple provides AAC and not MP3.

    74. Re:OK... by dissy · · Score: 1

      > Nice try. No, where does it tell you to rip it back in any format you want
      > after you burn it?

      Its called copyright law. You already are granted that right by law. Apple doesnt need to state it, because the law makes it legal and even if apple claimed it was not legal, they would just be wrong.

      The fair use provision clearly states you can convert or timeshift your media as much as you would like.

      Its the other part of copyright law that says you can not distribute that work without the copyright holders permission. And apple says you can not do that (IE for personal use)

    75. Re:OK... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      When did I complain or moan or gripe about anything? I am happily enjoying more music than I can listen to without any help from Apple or their DRM.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    76. Re:OK... by moehoward · · Score: 1

      So then what is the point of the DRM that Apple is using? It doesn't seem to "Manage" anything.

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    77. Re:OK... by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      Or you could just buy an FM transmitter for your iPod, and then play your AAC's from your iPod to ANY FM radio. And the installation is much easier than installing a new CD/MP3/WMA deck. Oh, and the iPod will hold hundreds of CD's worth of music so you don't have to waste hundreds of dollars on blank media and you don't have to lug around a CD carry case or go through the hassle of changing CDs while driving, etc. By the way, what happens to your WMA playing car stereo when the next version of WMA comes out and isn't backwards compatible?

    78. Re:OK... by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with the 128K radio stations. Maybe it's just your computer that's worthless.

    79. Re:OK... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Actually, the answer is simpler than you might realize. In my case, for example, I simply dont like the existence of DRM in my files: I believe my legal rights to fair use of purchased material should preclude any limitations on that use [excluding those that would be illegal for other reasons, such as broadcasting the music publically, or distributing it illegally]. As such, I have NO problem paying for my music - I'm proud to support artists - but I simply have a problem having my purchased goods crippled.

      As such, I eliminate the DRM.

      As violating the terms of the Apple license, you're technically correct. That said, I think this is the epitome of a victimless crime: I purcahsed my goods, and privately eliminate the DRM WITHOUT then doing anything which violates the intent of copyright law [i.e. i'm not distributing or publically viewing the music]. Frankly, unless I TOLD Apple, there's precisely zero way for them to know, because there's zero effect on the outside world.

      To answer any budding lawyers out there, I didn't figure the 'hack' out of burning the files to CD then reripping it. In fact, I think i read it first on slashdot many months ago [with the Mac release], so I dont think I'd fall under the DCMA for distributing illegal information.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    80. Re:OK... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Actually, numerically, there are more iPods sold than any other MP3 player. Thats one of the selling points to artists/labels to get them to put their music in the Apple Music Store.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    81. Re:OK... by dissy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > So then what is the point of the DRM that Apple is using? It doesn't seem
      > to "Manage" anything.

      Well, they got licences to distribute the music on iTMS, and its been argued that without some form of DRM this would never have happened.

      Its not useful as a form of protection, its useful as a means to an end.

    82. Re:OK... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Okay, AGAIN, I'm being misread (man, maybe I need to edit my posts before posting) to suggest that Microsoft is correct. Far from it, I disagree with them outright. See other posts.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    83. Re:OK... by 47Ronin · · Score: 1

      You can add more stations by just clicking on any that you like at shoutcast.com or live365.com .. in fact, you can add a station from any website that has a streaming rtsp URL.

      --
      Those who laugh at you for you having a Mac.. are the people who constantly call you to fix their PC.
    84. Re:OK... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I have the right to rip all my CD's and share with everyone on my network. It's my network. It's a private network. All the computers on my network are mine. It's with in my fair use rights to share my music with myself. And even if it wasn't legal, without haking into my network it would be illegal for anyone to even now I was doing it.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    85. Re:OK... by bshroyer · · Score: 1

      Using iTunes to rip an audio CD results in a folder full of MP3 files. DRM-free MP3 files. Do with them what you wish. Push them to your iPod and it'll play those same MP3 files. It's only the tunes you download from iTMS that are AAC encoded.

      --
      The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
    86. Re:OK... by Solkar · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong -- I've only read a couple of things about this -- but my understanding is that Apple ported its Webcore framework to Windows for all this. I think that's the basis of Safari, but is open to other apps on the Mac. It makes me wonder whether Apple has any plans to port Safari itself ... ?

    87. Re:OK... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I agree... it's usually cheaper for me (based on total value) to go to the record store... it may take me more time, but for me the trouble is less. I also get the benifits of browsing the used cd's, using the listening stations (i'm not limited to a 30sec clip), interacting with other shoppers, and seeing upcoming releases. Plus, at the records stores I shop at at 9 times out of 10 they have the disc I'm looking for. At the iTMS it's about 5 out of 10. Hell, they didn't even have the plyphonic spree; and they're the band playing in that VW Bug/iPod commercial.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    88. Re:OK... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? Fair use is when I can take my music file and play it on any device I please. Such as an MP3 CD player, or a linux box. And no, recompression is not good enough. They should be selling lossless files in the first place.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    89. Re:OK... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Where are you buying your CD's? The stores I shop in generally charge 9.99 - 12.99 for a disc. The last two full length albums I bought were the new outKast double disc ($17.98) and the new Dressy Bessy ($11.99). The outKast album is 19.99 at the iTMS and my Dressy Bessy album also came with a DVD. Tell me again why I'd want to pay more for less at iTMS?

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    90. Re:OK... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Please, recompression is not acceptable.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    91. Re:OK... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I like my flash based player, thank you very much. It lasts a whole week on one rechargeable AA battery. It's small, weighs nothing, won't ever skip, and holds more than enough music to get me through the day. All told I've invested about $100 in it (player, headphones, 128mb extra flash, notmad software). I don't see why I would want anything else (maybe a 3GB flash based player that supports flac?). And AAC won't play on my player... CD's I buy and rip will...

      30GB Nomad Zen $246.94

      20GB iPod $399.87

      I'm not going to argue whether the iPod or Zen is a better device, but the Zen is $150 cheaper, for 10 extra GB... it's definately ahead on value.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    92. Re:OK... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So if I want to listen to my ITMS music on my debian laptop with a tiny 18G hd, how I can only store about 50 as opposed to 300? The DRM is most definately existant and a major PITA.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    93. Re:OK... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      True, AAC is an open standard. But you still have to pay to license it. You're just able to see the standard before hand (same with MP3). WMA is a closed standard yes, but the licensing costs are miniscule... that's why you see WMA support on so many devices.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    94. Re:OK... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      It doesn't require IE. Honestly, where do you get this stuff? Do you just pull it out of your ass?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    95. Re:OK... by pjrc · · Score: 1
      I'm bitching about the "obscurity" copy protection scheme. I wrote my "bitching" in English, if you care to attempt to read it.

      Actually, your bitching appears to have been regarding the lack of explicit notice on Apple's site that you can rip the audio CDs and that doing so would be "legal" fair use.

      The phrase "security through obscurity" is widely known to refer to the practice of deploying a proprietary system where the effectiveness of the security measures can not be verified by all parties. Usually this applies to unpublished encryption ciphers and protocols which often have unknown weaknesses, but it can also apply to software that uses some unknown method to enforce security, where all third parties can not know exactly what it does and therefore they can not know how effective it is.

      It is quite a stretch to apply this widely understood term to the lack of specific language on Apple's web page, namely explicit wording that the burned CD can be ripped and free legal advise regarding fair use in doing so. Apple does explain, quite well, that you are allowed to burn standard audio CDs that will work in all players. The various cdrom standards (the colored books) document this format. There really isn't anything obscure here, in a technical sense.

      Because the CD can be ripped (effectively an easy way to circumvent the system) does not somehow make it obscure. Because Apple does not explicitly explain this method does not make it obscure. The fact that the burned CDs conform to the standards and lack DRM, in fact, makes it anything but obscure. The CDs conform to published standards and are fully compatible with players. It may not be "secure" in terms of preventing copying, but it certainly is anything but "obscure".

      Now the DRM that is included in the AAC files downloaded may or may not be "security through obscurity". I simply do not know if Apple is using a known technique, or if they have published informatation about it, or if it is a secret method they developed. If indeed the DRM on the AAC files is secret (AAC is a published standard), then THAT could reasonably be called "security through obscurity".

      But to call the permissive feature to burn unprotected CDs that conform to published standards "security through obscurity" is silly. It's definately not "obscurity". It probably isn't even "security" since standard CDs lack any copy prevention techniques.

    96. Re:OK... by Zigg · · Score: 1
    97. Re:OK... by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      Okay, AGAIN, I'm being misread

      Sorry... I didn't misread you, and I hope I didn't give the impression that I thought you agree with MS. I agree with you, and I disagree with them. I think you did a good job of analyzing Microsoft's position, and it's their position, not your analysis, to which I object.

    98. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, buddy...
      You can't play the AAC files from iTMS on an MP3 player because they are AAC (not MP3). You can't play them on a linux box because there is no way (yet) of handling the DRM that Apple had to provide in order to make the record execs pull their thumbs out of their asses without fear of shitting themselves.
      Oh, and which lossless audio compression do YOU recommend?

    99. Re:OK... by Tremo · · Score: 1

      I "know someone" who has used this same procedure to rip protected WMA files with Micro$oft's DRM from WMP9. The downloaded WMA files can only be played on a player with the proper licenses, but it also allows you to burn a colored-book copy that you can use to play the music on your home stereo, car, etc.... Well this burned copy has absolutely no protection, and can then easily be re-ripped and converted to MP3 or whatever. Sounds like a clear cut case of fair use to me, explicit permission to re-rip is not required.

    100. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've ripped my classical music to 320kbps for my ipod, and really, I don't hear a difference between that and the original CD. If you're not an audiophile, you don't need flac.

      Just in case: there's nothing wrong with my ears. The last time I had them checked the doctor commended me on the quality of my hearing (which is becoming rare apparently in these days of loud thumping bass where ever you go).

    101. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use itunes on my laptop and don't have any music on my windows partition. It's all on the ipod.

      Debian can play music straight off the ipod, and ofcourse, the ipod has a cradle with a line-out (bundled for all models except the 10 gig).

    102. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What that says is that if you make cd writers, or cdr's you're off the hook (the digital recording device and medium bits). Also, there's the explicit waiver for anyone using these devices or media to record music in a non-commercial fashion. Now, that does seem to imply it's OK to copy music for personal, non-commercial, use, but I don't see how it allows you to keep copies of music you sell to someone else (since this bit doesn't seem to cover the sale of music, which is commercial by nature).

    103. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, time-shifting and space-shifting (format shifting) are both legal uses of copyright. The thing with itms music is that it gives you the right to play the same song on multiple pieces of hardware at the same time. This means every itunes-running machine on your local network, and every itunes copy authorized to share your song (up to three, meaning you can legally play the song on three different network at the same time). That's a right you don't have with CD's, where you can move around the music as much as you want, but you can only listen to one copy of it at a time.

      The itms is indeed very liberal with what it allows.

    104. Re:OK... by BCole · · Score: 1

      I think the main thrust of Microsofts complaint is that you can only take music from iTunes directly to an iPod, where as in WMP you can go to many more devices.

    105. Re:OK... by WNight · · Score: 1

      Requiring iTunes vX.y to use iTunes network is pretty easy. I require Quake 3 to play a game of Quake 3. When it gets restrictive is when there's a website (you know - platform independent) that requires a specific browser, and a version of Media Player that not only does things I don't want, but includes features I actively distrust.

      It'd be as if you needed IE6 to play Quake3, and not for a real requirement, but because the install program insisted on popping up the release notes in it, or something else silly.

    106. Re:OK... by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      iTunes can burn MP3 CDs for your car.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    107. Re:OK... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Not surprisingly, some CDs are more expensive at the iTMS than they are at a store, and some things are cheaper. Amazon has Outkast's Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik disc for $14.99, iTMS for $9.99.

      The places I shop sell their CDs at $12-18 for a single disc, including Best Buy, Barnes & Noble [1], and some local places. Far more often though, I'll buy my CDs used from Half.com or Amazon. BB has traditionally been a cheaper place to buy CDs. Hell, at BB, the "super saver" CDs are $12, and it's pretty much impossible to find a newer CD for $9.99 there. Where do you shop?

      But why does it have to be some lifestyle choice to buy stuff at iTMS? Why does it have to be all or nothing? If something is cheaper, why not buy it at the iTMS? If you're getting something extra- like the DVD you mentioned, if it's important to you, buy it at the regular store. If you wanted to buy that other Outkast CD, why shouldn't I buy it at iTMS rather than buying it at the store and paying a lot more?

      I mean, it's not like you own the freaking store- so why be so zealous about it?

      [1] I get B&N GCs from my credit card regularily, so I only buy a CD there when I have a couple to burn.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    108. Re:OK... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Where do you shop?

      Easy Street Records is my preferred store. They seem to have the best prices, and unlike alot of indie stores they seem to have enough purchasing power to put stuff on major labels on sale. The cheaper CD's tend to be on indie labels. Most every SUB POP release is $9.99 for the first couple of weeks it's in stores. I guess that's why alot of the music I buy is cheaper, I'm mainly sticking to stuff on indie labels.

      If something is cheaper, why not buy it at the iTMS? If you're getting something extra- like the DVD you mentioned, if it's important to you, buy it at the regular store. If you wanted to buy that other Outkast CD, why shouldn't I buy it at iTMS rather than buying it at the store and paying a lot more?

      From my limited observations, I haven't really found anything that is cheaper (at least in terms of value to me). At most I'll save 3 or 4 dollars. But I'm also not getting artwork, the jewel case, the CD media, and uncompressed audio (I have a non iPod mp3 player, and want to go to mp3 without double loss). To me those are worth the money so nothing seems cheaper to me at iTMS. I've always treated downloading like the radio, I use it to hear before I buy and $.99 is too much to pay for that... maybe if they offered low quality 64 or 48 kbps files for a few cents I'd be in on it.

      I mean, it's not like you own the freaking store- so why be so zealous about it?

      No, I don't own the store... but if people don't support their independent record stores they won't stay in buisness, I think they provide a valuable service to the community (not just selling music) and I don't want to see them go under.

      But why does it have to be some lifestyle choice to buy stuff at iTMS?

      To me it's not a lifestlye choice to buy things at iTMS, it's a lifestyle choice going to a record store. Record stores are great places where you meet interesting people who may share alot of the same tastes as you. They're fun to go to with friends and browse. There is a certain tactile feel to it that I love. But if everyone moves to online distribution, they're going to dissapear and I think it would be a great loss to see that happen.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    109. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have AAC evaluation tools that are at least 5 years old. Furthermore, LiquidAudio was using AAC very early on - so if you ever fooled around with the Liquifier, you fooled around with AAC. Also, I believe (at least at one point a few years ago) MusicMatch had at least playback support for AAC files.

      I don't remember which things were free and which were pay - so possibly QuickTime 6 is the first app where end users can create their own AAC files "for free." I understand there is a plugin for Winamp that can play AAC.

    110. Re:OK... by Chump1422 · · Score: 1

      Aren't value and device quality inextricably linked? Only if HD size is the only thing you care about is the Zen a better value.

      I'd say the iPod is a better value because I like using it better. And that's worth $150 to me. You can't talk about value without talking about quality.

    111. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swell, just what people want: music with a lot of artifacts thanks to lossy-to-lossy transcoding.

    112. Re:OK... by Demolition · · Score: 1

      If iTunes required IE 5/6, then it seems likely that Apple would have listed that under the requirements at the iTunes download page. There's no mention of any extra software requirement, except for a recommendation to make sure that your Windows OS install is up-to-date.

      D.

    113. Re:OK... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      totally agree.

      payless shoes are cheaper, but they wear out in a month..

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    114. Re:OK... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      it is not that it makes me FEEL superior, it is that I AM superior to you.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    115. Re:OK... by Technician · · Score: 1

      In the car it doesn't matter. With the tires turning, the engine running, and air going by, no speaker smaller than 4 inch or bigger than 6 inch, the artifacts are very hard to find. However in my study on my good system, better source material is desirable.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    116. Re:OK... by dydxjessedydt · · Score: 1

      And plus, you dont have to rip to aac. Just change the defualt and rip strait to mp3.

    117. Re:OK... by tshak · · Score: 1

      Because IE is a part of Windows, it's no longer a seperate product. And I've verified it's IE5, not 6.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    118. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you explain why iTunes has file handles on IE's Cache, History, and Cookie files/folders?

    119. Re:OK... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      It would depend - are you selling at a profit?

      If you're making money out of the whole process, then it is commercial. If you're just covering costs I think you're off the hook.

      The whole purpose of the Amerian Home Recording Act was to allow people to do what most people would consider fair use - copying CDs onto tapes to listen to in their cars, and even to make casual copies for friends.

      It was felt that the rules would not cost the record companies much while still banning mass-copying using industrial-scale hardware. It also instituted a royalty on sales of audio CD-Rs which is paid to an industry consortium to be distributed to copyright-holders.

    120. Re:OK... by Atryn · · Score: 1

      To clarify, the limited set of devices I was referencing include the iPod and whatever computers you are accessing iTunes from. Computers are devices, just larger than what you may have been interpreting the word to describe.

      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    121. Re:OK... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Ah. That makes sense.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    122. Re:OK... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I don't want an ipod. That's why my laptop has a soundcard. I have enough electronic gear weighing me down, I don't want any more. So my point stands. ITMS DRM is a major PITA. Emusic had it right. Pity they sold out.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    123. Re:OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, AAC is not MP3, yeah. But there will be AAC players soon enough. Why should I be locked into a single device or piece of software to enjoy *my* music? That is fair use, and is prohibited by apples DRM. This may be acceptable for the great grandparent poster, but not for me.

      As for lossless codecs, that's a no brainer: FLAC. It's Free (yes, freedom is important) and compresses to within a few percent of the best lossless codecs around.

  7. wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    talk about doublespeak

    I thought MS already said this, and they indeed did.

  8. This from the restriction overlords themselves... by Gunfighter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hrmm... I guess, according to Microsoft's logic, I should switch to WindowsXP so that I won't be restricted to viewing music, movies, etc. in non-Microsoft^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hstandard formats.

    Yeah, right. If Microsoft understood open formats, they would have launched their own music download service months ago.

    Now I remember why my cluebat has a permanant imprint of Mr. Gates' forehead on one side.

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
  9. 2 MS Bashing Stories in a Row! by moehoward · · Score: 1

    Cool! Taco must be shaking in his boots, running scared due to today's release of Office 2003.

    OK. I'm just sort of kidding. But really. This ramped up bashing does not look good when MS does a big release like they are today. It looks like sour grapes. Which, of course, it is...

    Why not get more positive on what you believe in, rather than bash?

    And just look at the story just before the consecutive MS bashing stories... It's about linux zealots gone wild. Hmmmm.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:2 MS Bashing Stories in a Row! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Pot, Meet Mr. Kettle.

      This article is about MICROSOFT bashing APPLE. Or did you read it? Care to comment on Microsoft's bashing of iTunes for Windows?

  10. Best use of Ironic tag... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1, Funny


    Oh wait...wrong site.

    1. Re:Best use of Ironic tag... by itsari · · Score: 1

      Come on, use valid XHTML:

      <img src="http://img.fark.com/images/2001/topics/ironic .gif" alt="Microsoft comments on how monopolies limit a user's choice." />

  11. which means they see it as a threat? by westcourt_monk · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think MS might be worried here. Apple has product placement now and it has the cool factor. MS will have a hard time breaking into the market for sure now. Their stance on DRM makes their AAC criticism look foolish. Do they not have a public relations office?

    If Apple hits the 10 million mark by Christmas I will be impressed, MS will be scared, and the RIAA might start to be quiet.. maybe.

    --
    I am going to hell and I am going to take all of you with me.
    1. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by bubbasatan · · Score: 5, Informative

      If Apple hits the 10 million mark by Christmas I will be impressed...

      I think I heard that Unca Steve and company have stated that their goal is 100 million songs sold by the end of this year. Considering that they sold 13 million to approximately 5% of the market (Apple users), and have since sold 1 million in the first 3.5 days of iTMS for Windows and Mac, that's pretty impressive. I don't know if 100 million is gonna happen, but hey, everybody needs to aspire to something.

      --
      Windows is going the way of phlogiston...
    2. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by li99sh79 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I think I heard that Unca Steve and company have stated that their goal is 100 million songs sold by the end of this year.

      Actually it's by the end of the first year of iTMS's existence, so by late April of next year. I suspect that Pepsi promotion is going to help pad Apple's numbers if it looks like they're going to be a little short. ;)

      -sam

      --
      I was just here, where did I go?
    3. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do you people try to make Apple seem more inportant than They really are? Microsoft is not scared of Apple. Microsoft would like to have a music download business going, but Apple is not going to take any significant market share away from MS in the areas that will hurt them.


      You zealots really amuse me sometimes.

    4. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by Luscious868 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I think MS might be worried here.

      Two things. First, you're completely right. Anytime Microsoft or any Microsoft employee talks about "choice" with a straight face then there is definitely something going on.

      Second, they should be worried. I downloaded iTunes when it was released and immediately started using it as my main media player / jukebox. After buying some tracks from the iTMS I decided to bite the bullet and buy a new 40 GB iPod from the Apple store. Granted I had wanted to buy some kind of MP3 player for a while but I was heavily leaning toward one of the 128 or 256 MB flash players. I had absolutely no intention of buying a hard drive based MP3 player and definitely nothing as expensive as even the 10 GB iPod. After using iTunes and the iTMS and reading about how great people thought the iPod was I decided to go with the iPod. I had it shipped overnight and spent the entire weekend ripping my CD collection to MP3 in iTunes and playing around with the iPod. After a few days I can say that I am thoroughly impressed with both products and my satisfaction with them will result in having to take a serious look at a Mac the next time I buy a computer.

      The iPod, while expensive, is such a great product. I can take my whole music collection with me where everywhere I go. The batter lasts 7 - 8 hours, it can be charged to 80% capacity in an hour (it takes about 4 for 100%) and it's small enough to fit comfortably in my pocket. The user interface makes it easy to interact with. It comes with a dock that has a line out jack so I can hook it into my stereo or take it with me to a friends and hook it into their equipment. With the car adaptor kit I can use it in my car.

      The iPod also acts as a portable hard drive and a mini PDA. Setting the it up as a portable hard drive takes one click in iTunes. I had to buy the USB adaptor and a cable but now I can use the iPod to transfer files between my PC at work and my computer at home. You can also export your contact and appointment information from Outlook and store it in the iPod. It's even easier if you have a Mac as iSync can automatically sync your contact and calendar information for you.

      I'm thrilled to death with the iTunes / iPod combo and I don't recall ever feeling this way about anything Microsoft has produced. So, to summarize, I think Microsoft is scared and they very well should be. I'm a happy Apple customer who will consider buying other Apple products in the future. Before iTunes and the iPod I wouldn't have even considered buying a Mac, or anything else produced by Apple.

      Microsoft won't be able to one up Apple anytime soon by bundeling their Music Store / Jukebox with the next version of Windows because Longhorn is still such a long way off. That means that Microsoft is going to actually have to compete with Apple on the merits of it's own software and DRM format. That's going to be increadibly hard to do.

    5. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by Hollinger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're partially correct. They are shooting for 100 million in one year from the original launch of iTMS, so the date should be April of 2004.

      If my math's correct, that averages to a smidge greater than three purchases per second for the entire 366 day period.

      The biggest problem Apple has at the moment is still one of a limited audience. They have yet to open the iTMS to an international audience. Canadians, especially, are really feeling as if they're left out in the cold, and may go to other services (if they haven't already).

    6. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0, Redundant

      noooooo...100 million sold in a year since ITMS was first opened on the mac.

      try watching the press event for christ sake.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      but the Pepsi promotion counts. pepsi is PAYING for the songs. once the song is downloaded, pepsi throws the cash over to apple for it.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    8. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by Graff · · Score: 1
      I suspect that Pepsi promotion is going to help pad Apple's numbers if it looks like they're going to be a little short.

      Heh, actually Steve Jobs already mentioned that in his presentation on Windows iTunes and iTunes Music Store 2. He basically said that they hope to sell 100 million in a year since iTunes launched and in fact they already have because of the Pepsi deal.

      Gotta love how he pre-spins the story to take the wind out of the sails of the eventual detractors.
    9. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I think Apple will get into other countries first since they have been working out the licensing agreements with the respective companies for a while.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    10. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The biggest problem Apple has at the moment is still one of a limited audience. They have yet to open the iTMS to an international audience. Canadians, especially, are really feeling as if they're left out in the cold, and may go to other services (if they haven't already).

      The US is a much bigger market than any other single country. Canada has 1/10 the number of computers as the US. Market size wil likely be a factor driving the order in which deals are negotiated.

      number of computers by country

    11. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by Ciderx · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure Microsoft executives will be quaking in their boots, scared, knowing that Apple have made less than $2 million from iTMS in about 3 months.

    12. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by rot26 · · Score: 1

      Why do you people try to make Apple seem more inportant than They really are?

      Let's put that in perspective. YOU are unimportant. How do I know? Because Microsoft has never issued a press release that mentions you in any way. OTOH, MS has pretty much never shut up for any meaningful period of time about Apple. I can conclude from this that Bill Gates feels that Apple is, in fact, a Very Important company. Looking at mere market share is missing the point entirely: Apple is a market leader in practically every aspect of their business, and by dismissing them as insignificant to Microsoft you're not only displaying your ignorance of the industry, you're displaying ignorance of even Microsoft's own egocentric view of the industry.

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    13. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft won't be able to one up Apple anytime soon by bundeling their Music Store / Jukebox with the next version of Windows because Longhorn is still such a long way off.

      That's what Windows Update is for... Patch the "bug" in Windows Media Player so it now is a tightly integrated music management and music store access application.

    14. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Their stance on DRM makes their AAC criticism look foolish. Do they not have a public relations office?

      Sure they do. You didn't think this guy would remain unemployed for very long, did you?

      Who do you think came up with these recent statements released by Microsoft?

      "We are not afraid of Apple. Allah has condemned them. They are stupid. They are stupid" (dramatic pause) "and they are condemned."

      "Those infidels at Apple, they always depend on a method what I call ... stupid, silly. All I ask is check yourself. Do not in fact repeat their lies. Microsoft will bring you freedom. Microsoft will honor the faithful with freedom of choice by our glorious innovation and commitment to drive those one-mouse-button infidels into the sea."

      "I can say, and I am responsible for what I am saying, that they have started to commit suicide under the walls of Cupertino. We will encourage them to commit more suicides quickly. "

      "Their [Apple's] failure in this regard is abysmal. They want to tell the world changes thought - as a matter of fact, they do not respect the world, they want to tell users and the music-buying public to keep them deceived. We will embroil them and their music service, confuse them and keep them in the quagmire. They have begun to tell more lies about their proprietary system so that they might continue with the perpetration of their crimes of prohibiting freedom. May they be accursed."

      "Faltering forces of infidels cannot just take aim at our glorious company and lay besiege to it! They are the ones who will find themselves under siege. Therefore, in reality whatever this miserable Jobs has been saying, he was talking about his own forces. Now even iTunes is under siege."

      "ITunes is like the braying of a mule and its customers deluded by promises of choice when they are, in truth, shackled by the proprietary system of an insignificant vendor. May Apple's stomach swell and rupture and its customers come crawling in abject humility to Microsoft's superior offerings. We will bring glorious triumph to those who remain faithful to Allah and his prophet, Ballmer. Gates akbar! Gates akbar!"

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    15. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly the same feeling I had when I bought my first Powerbook 3 years ago. It didn't take long to pick up Airport and an iPod. Before I knew it all my roommates and my girlfriend were getting Macs, too. As a long time user of obscure computing equipment (linux, beos, dvorak keyboards, etc.) I had given up long ago trying to convert other people, but they just naturally moved on over once they had the ability to play with a Mac with their own hands. Enjoy!

    16. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought an ipod even before itunes for windows was released. My ipod has become so much better with itunes.

      I too will be considering a mac for my next PC, directly because of my ipod purchase. I usually spend enough so that I could afford a mac anyway.

    17. Re:which means they see it as a threat? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I suspect that Pepsi promotion is going to help pad Apple's numbers if it looks like they're going to be a little short. ;)

      I believe Jobs said they're giving away (not selling) 100 million songs via Pepsi; this will be in addition to the 100 million they want to sell. So really, that'll be a total of 200 million, if you consider that Pepsi's marketing department is basically buying 100 million songs.

      Of course, in order to redeem your free bottlecap song, you have to 1) download and install iTunes, and 2) sign up for an iTMS account. Once that's done, and you've gotten your one free song, you might as well buy a few more, right?

      Since iTunes requires Windows 2000, Windows XP or Mac OS X, not everyone can run it. Those still running Windows 98 or Mac OS 9 can either give away or throw away their winning bottlecaps.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  12. MS has always cared about the freedom to choose by Dr.+q00p · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 98 SE, Windows ME, Windows 2000 and Windows XP. What's your problem?

    1. Re:MS has always cared about the freedom to choose by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Man, if you're going to make that joke, be realistic. It's Windows XP Pro, Windows XP Home, Windows XP Media Center, Windows XP Tablet Edition, Windows CE PocketPC .NET, Windows 2003 Server, Windows 2000 Server, and Windows 2000 Pro. (95/98/SE/ME aren't sold anymore, at least if the CDW site is accurate).

    2. Re:MS has always cared about the freedom to choose by Bendebecker · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about Windows 3.1? I saw that in a bargain bin earlier this year!

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    3. Re:MS has always cared about the freedom to choose by shfted! · · Score: 1

      As long as you only want Windows 2000 and Windows XP. Which is not really a problem, because I don't use Windows anyway :D

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    4. Re:MS has always cared about the freedom to choose by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1
      Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 98 SE, Windows ME, Windows 2000 and Windows XP. What's your problem?
      My problem is that the lack of freedom makes me WinCE. :^)
    5. Re:MS has always cared about the freedom to choose by BenV666 · · Score: 1

      Heeej, what happened to NT 4.0? ;)

    6. Re:MS has always cared about the freedom to choose by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

      You can have your Ford T in any color you'd like - as long as it's black.

    7. Re:MS has always cared about the freedom to choose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus Windows XP for Embedded Devices.

  13. Round 2! by 1010011010 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think we had this story already.

    It *is* extremely hypocritical, but also typical, of Microsoft to make thiese kinds of statements. They're really upset that

    1. iTMS is better than their "solutions" for digital music.
    2. iTunes is better software than Windows Media Player 9 (wuh, it's awful to use).
    3. It doesn't lock anyone into MICROSOFT products
    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    1. Re:Round 2! by TheDredd · · Score: 1

      It *is* extremely hypocritical, but also typical, of Microsoft to make thiese kinds of statements.

      I'd rather see them making these statements then sabotage the software. Remember what they did to the Netscape Navigator startup times, and the Quicktime error messages??

    2. Re:Round 2! by unclebulgaria · · Score: 1

      I would thoroughly agree with the "awful to use" comment, WMP does have good playback IMO though, I have done some tests with Winamp 2.9, iTunes and WMP, and WMP came in top for quality to me (for most genres), but its interface is so damn horrible, I would never use it. Winamp came second, and iTunes came last, but since I have changed the audio output from the quicktime control panel from DirectSound to wave out, and it's perhaps equal to winamp now, make sure you avoid the sound enhancer though, yuk. *I had to turn off their stupid features on WMP, like 3D enhancement and the crazy bass boost to make it sound better than the others.

  14. you can import... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont understand... you can import any of your existing music into iTunes.. how is this limiting to ITMS?

    1. Re:you can import... by jceaser · · Score: 1

      Yes. iTunes started it's life as an mp3 player. You can inport, manage and play all your mp3 files from the app. You can also download .m4p files (aac) from the iTunes Music store which are the only files that are specific to iTunes.

  15. need a good subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they are complaining that there isn't enough choice while The US Government is still looking into them about DRM?

  16. They should be warning people instead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About the iTunes "features" that seem to be impacting a significant number of people, particularly on 2K. Many systems won't boot (and it doesn't seem repairable in many cases) and some are getting their mp3 files scrambled and renamed without any clear warning.

    At the least it sounds incredibly buggy. I'm sure people will be "switching" in droves now.

    http://arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/03q2/i-tunes-1.h tml

  17. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh the irony.

    Irony:
    1. The use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning.
    2. An expression or utterance marked by a deliberate contrast between apparent and intended meaning.

    Dishonest, but not ironic.

    1. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I *expect* MS to use DRM and prorietary file formats, and this is exactly what occurs.

      The issue isn't whether or not MS doesn't practice what they preach, but whether their *words* have a different meaning. They do not. They're just the opposite of their own actions.

      It's still not ironic.

    2. Re:Irony by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      I call "dupe".This whole thread is simply a rehash of an earlier slashdot article

      1. Socratic Irony--feigning ignorance. Often called "trolling"
      2 Schlegelian Irony--holding simultaneously, two contradictory intellectual positions. For instance, on slashdot, legal advice is often suffixed with IANAL.
      3. The realization that "recieved truth" has no meaning. A typical slashdot thread, although SCO stories tend to attract ironic fatalists in great numbers.
      4. The death of sincerity. There's no such thing as truth, or love, or wisdom, as all communication is ultimately self referential. This post, for instance, simply rehashes an earlier set of posts on the same subject, and thus contributes nothing to the "enlightenment" of slashdot.

    3. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post, for instance, simply rehashes an earlier set of posts on the same subject, and thus contributes nothing to the "enlightenment" of slashdot.

      Much like your holier-than-thou reply, oh great one.

    4. Re:Irony by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      By "this post", I was referring to my own. It's supposed to be self-referential... Oh, forget it.

  18. sour grapes by Sillypuddy · · Score: 0

    Looks like sour grapes to me

    if they came out first they won't be singing the same song (haha)

    -joe

  19. I love it! by craqboy · · Score: 0
    Is it just me or did apple just send a missle by porting an awesome audio app to windows.

    Somebody needs to take over the market from Microsoft and I do not see why Apple would not be the perfect company to do this.

    Rock on apple.

  20. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Now I remember why my cluebat has a permanant imprint of Mr. Gates' forehead on one side.

    Oh please. Bill Gates has made Microsoft one of the most successful companies of all time. Your "cluebat" is useless to Mr. Gates.

  21. Are the planets aligned??? by overbyj · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was going to write a comment on this but after thinking about how absurd this is, I am completely stumped. Thank you MS, you have completely sucked the witty comebacks out of me with this one.

    --
    No trees were harmed in the composition of this; however, numerous electrons were inconvenienced.
  22. Feds, states question XP's music link by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In related news:

    Federal and state regulators have voiced concern that a feature in Windows XP that involves online music purchasing may violate terms of Microsoft's antitrust settlement.

    The issue surfaced in a court-mandated briefing filed jointly by Microsoft and federal and state regulators. The compliance update says there are ongoing discussions over the "Shop for Music Online" feature in the operating system.

    "Plaintiffs are concerned that the feature invokes Microsoft's Internet Explorer, rather than the user's chosen default browser, in a manner that may be inconsistent" with the settlement, according to the filing.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  23. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by Walterk · · Score: 1

    Could you please stop hitting him on the head with your bat? Maybe that's one of the reason's he's braindead.

  24. Re:OH MY GOD! Do not click that link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're new here, aren't you?

  25. Re:dupe by moehoward · · Score: 1

    Amazing that Taco posted both stories.

    The smell of desperation is embarassing. How pathetic.

    "MS released a new version of Office! Oh no!! Prepare to bash at full speed!"

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
  26. Perfect irony by dethl · · Score: 1

    Let me get this straight....they were sued for having a monopoly, yet now are accusing Apple, with a market share from 4% to 5% of being a monopoly in the music service?

    Mr.Gates, the people have spoken, with 1 million songs downloaded from iTMS in 3.5 days, and they don't want your crap for "standards".

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  27. Re:Oh that's rich! by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are they serious? LOL

    I'm sorry, "LOL" has been copyrighted/trademarked/patented/ by AOL. Please edit your post to reflect this. I suggest "Are they srious? AOL"

    Thankyou for your time.
    moo.
    -1 Offtopic (sorry, i'm bored)

  28. The only amazing thing is.. by js3 · · Score: 1

    they managed to turn that quote into an entire article. So microsoft doesn't like itunes.. who would have thought

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
  29. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by Dutchmaan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually the "cluebat" would be useful for many corporate CEO's... Apple included.

    If companies could be forced compete on the merits of their products alone (instead of trying to trap customers and lock them in), this world would be taking a step in the right direction.

  30. Re:Bush has never lied moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Brave men? This coming from an AC.

  31. Dejavuvuvuvuvuvuvuvavu... by Denyer · · Score: 1

    I'm barely arrived on the scene and even I recognise this as a repost...

    ObGEEK: So, what do we reckon the DRM restrictions put in place will be when Microsoft launch their own store?

    I'm thinking there's a (slim as anything) chance they might recognise the need for CD burning of purchases content.

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  32. The pot and the kettle are both black. by 3Suns · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Unless Apple decides to make radical changes to their service model, a Windows-based version of iTunes will still remain a closed system, where iPod owners cannot access content from other services. Additionally, users of iTunes are limited to music from Apple's Music Store. As I mentioned earlier, this is a drawback for Windows users, who expect choice in music services, choice in devices, and choice in music from a wide-variety of music services to burn to a CD or put on a portable device," said Fester. David, that is.


    Huh? iTunes is not limited to Apple Music downloads, it also plays mp3s, audio CDs, and pretty much anything other un-DRMed audio you have. The iPod has always played mp3s. What's Apple supposed to do, preemptively invent DRM solutions that profit other companies and put those into iTunes? And iTunes does allow you to burn to an audio CD. MS WMP would do no different than Apple here.

    Granted, Apple Music downloads are useless to anyone without iTunes (on Windows or Mac) or an iPod. Until I can play them in linux, they're useless to me. And don't tell me to burn everything to a CD and then rip it. Apple Music is also useless if you want to listen on a non-apple portable. Once again, Apple has chosen to support "everyone" by offering a choice of proprietary systems, rather than a single open system. "Windows or Mac" is just as bad as "Mac only" or "Windows only".
    --

    -3Suns

    ~~~~
    The Revolution will be Slashdotted
    1. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by Silverhammer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Blockquoth the poster:

      Granted, Apple Music downloads are useless to anyone without iTunes (on Windows or Mac) or an iPod. Until I can play them in linux, they're useless to me. And don't tell me to burn everything to a CD and then rip it.

      Burn everything to a CD and then rip it.

      Seriously, it's time to reconsider your expectations. It's an online music store -- the RIAA would not allow it to exist without some form of DRM. So be thankful for the loophole.

    2. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by arendjr · · Score: 1

      Until I can play them in linux, they're useless to me. And don't tell me to burn everything to a CD and then rip it.

      Makes me wonder... Isn't it be possible to simply write an iso and mount that in Linux? It would save you some of the hassle.

    3. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
      I really hate to go trolling here, but I think this has to be said. I know this is slashdot and yeah, pro linux, woot, woot, etc, et. al, but Linux's short commings are in the lack of commerical software. The only time I have seen Linux being used in a major shop was with Maya, and the 3D artists loved it because most were former SGI/Irix users.

      In all my years with linux (about 8 now, I started with Slackware 3) I have Linux become a very easy "intro to unix" application. However the Linux community arguable is more zeloty than the Mac community.

      I like Opensource solutions. I use them almost daily in the form of FreeBSD, Linux, phpProjekt, MySQL, PostgreSQL, PHP, PERL, etc., but this is all on the server side.

      In the past two years, really the past 18 months or so, why is it that about 60% of the Linux users I know (about 15 people) switched to Macintosh OS 10? (This includes myself). I know of another 5 - 10 that were waiting for the G5's and OS 10.3, so I imagine they will be purchasing those in the next few weeks, and then the others simply can't afford to switch to macintosh or are the hardcore zelots. Why are more people switching from Linux to Mac for their desktop? The very same reason why you say, "until I can play them in Linux". Until. That may be tomorrow or never. Macintosh at least has professional grade software for their platform from supported vendors like Macromedia, QuarkXpress, Adobe et. al., etc. This is why I switched. I stopped using windows because I could never get the system stable long enough to do anything (this was with 98 & 98SE, 2000 was actully decent) so I started to use Linux. I was happy with Linux and staroffice until I got into my upper level college classes and found that I had to have MS Office for items like Excell and Powerpoint. (business major).

      So when it came time to replace my Sony Vaio laptop (with win 98) I was getting ready to leave for a semester in Germany and I was tired of fooling with the nitty gritty details of lack of drivers in Linux, unstable windows, and wanted something that just worked. So I bought this iBook because I got my Unix development enviroment for PHP/MySQL coding along with standard tools like photoshop and GoLive, DW, Flash, Office, etc.

      If you choose to run Linux, you know its short falls and I hope are intelligent to know enough about markets that until Linux and its community realizes that most Linux deployments are in the server room and not deskops, AND that not all commercial software is evil, that they will be out in the dark waiting. Meanwhile, many of the non-zelots that actully like having *iux enviroment will proably continue to switch to the Apple platform.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    4. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1

      You will never be able to play them under Linux. The whole idea of DRM requires that the user cannot intercept the music stream on the way from the software decoder to the sound card (and there is a big push to extend this and encrypt the connection from the sound card to the speakers, too). That is completely opposite to the nature of Linux.

    5. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using non-iPod with iTunes since its inception using mp3 encoding.

      While the store only provides for AAC you can certainly burn/RIP back to MP3 for other players or RIP in MP3 from your own sources.

      What's the big deal? iTunes works fine, at least on Mac, with almost every MP3 player out there.

      Anybody check if Win iTunes will GROK MP3 players plugged into the USB port while its running like the Mac version does?

    6. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by SavoWood · · Score: 1

      AAC is *NOT* a proprietary Apple format. It is an open format.

      --
      Plant a tree in a developing country.
    7. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by HermanZA · · Score: 1

      No, write it to an ISO file, loopback mount it and rip it. This process can be done with a simple script and saves you from wasting(?) a CDR.

    8. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by 3Suns · · Score: 1

      Are you sure this will work? I haven't tried the service or the software, but I'm pretty sure the only way you can the songs to CD is through iTunes. Extrapolating from all of Apple's other "idiotproof" interfaces, burning to an ISO won't be an option. 'Course I might be wrong.

      --

      -3Suns

      ~~~~
      The Revolution will be Slashdotted
    9. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 1
      Seriously, it's time to reconsider your expectations. It's an online music store -- the RIAA would not allow it to exist without some form of DRM. So be thankful for the loophole.
      Well, I am thankful for the loophole, but I still don't really understand the need for DRM. It's not like those shiny discs I buy in the store have any DRM on them -- why not just let me bypass Best Buy and physical media and sell me a pre-ripped song online?

      Everyone knows how to rip a CD by now -- it's not like CDs are secure in any sense of the word any more. So why exactly is it so scary to sell me a un-DRMed song or album?

      I'm not interested in dealing with Kazaa, and I'd ethically like to pay for my music. If iTMS would sell me lossless rips, I'd base my entire music collection around their store. As it is now, I'll pick up EPs or individual songs every so often. But albums I'll always visit Amazon.com or Best Buy for. Better quality and no DRM, for $2-4 more.
    10. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a whiny bitch :)

    11. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      But can't you use some form (I'm stabbing in the dark here-I don't know myself) of disc utility to create a blank ISO, "mount" it in the CD drive so that iTunes **thinks** a CD-R is inserted, and then "burn" it to the ISO instead of a physical disc? I know there are those virtual drive apps for gaming, there should be something comparable for this. I know you can create blank images with Apple's Disk Copy utility, so there should be a way to create blank CD images with some 3rd-party app as well...

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    12. Re:The pot and the kettle are both black. by markalot · · Score: 1

      DRM is somethign that smaked me in the face. I tried ITunes, loved it, but was concerned about the proprietary format. I looked at MusicMatch (and was planning on looking at the new Napster) because it supports WMA and my DVD player plays WMA files, so I thought cool, an easy way to buy music and have access to it via that ole stereo box.

      I was a bit naive. Of course my DVD player can't play protected WMA files, and of course there is no built in way to say store my license file on the cd so my DVD player can read it and decode the music.

      WHY?

      As a matter of fact, why did Microsoft even push for WMA support on DVD players when they don't support DRM? Am I missing something, is their a standard that my DVD player (or RIO Volt for that matter) needs to support in order to play protected music?

      So as it stands now, I am going to use the product with the best interface, and iTunes wins easily.

  33. link to the referenced article by ih8apple · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't believe no one looked this up yet. Anyway, this link goes to the Microsoft "Q&A about iTunes" that the Register article refers to.

    1. Re:link to the referenced article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me a troll or this comment flamebait if you like, but I find it strangely humorous that this guy's name is Fester. That brings to mind two separate but equally funny images: good old crackpot Uncle Fester from the Addams family, and the actual dictionary version of "fester"
      # To generate pus; suppurate. # To form an ulcer. # To undergo decay; rot. # 1. To be or become an increasing source of irritation or poisoning; rankle: bitterness that festered and grew. 2. To be subject to or exist in a condition of decline: allowed the once beautiful park to fester .
      Either concept is amusing when looking at Microsoft.

    2. Re:link to the referenced article by Palshife · · Score: 1

      Wow, it's entirely possible that the entire point of that Q&A was for Microsoft to plug Napster.

      Now how did they get in bed...

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    3. Re:link to the referenced article by zontroll · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, you would see that the register comments: "Microsoft's David Fester (and whether Fester is his birthname or an homage to his CEO, we don't know..."

    4. Re:link to the referenced article by dema · · Score: 1

      Well if you had the read the article (which is commonly the point of news being posted on slash) you would've found that link. And the fact that parent was modded up 5 kind of makes me wonder how many people actually do read the articles.

    5. Re:link to the referenced article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Apple have grounds for sueing Microsoft because some of those statements are patently false?

    6. Re:link to the referenced article by zontroll · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. The article doesn't link to the microsoft "article". That's the whole point of the parent post.

    7. Re:link to the referenced article by dema · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      "Lastly, if you use Apple's music store along with iTunes, you don't have the ability of using the over 40 different Windows Media-compatible portable music devices. When I'm paying for music, I want to know that I have choices today and in the future," he said.

      Looks like a link to me (:

    8. Re:link to the referenced article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In theory, Apple could sue him for libel, since he was spreading potentially damaging falsehoods about their products.

      I love the part about how iTunes users won't be able to listen to music from other services. Last time I checked, it was pretty much impossible to remove Windows Media Player, therefore, you could always fall back on it if you just absolutely needed to listen to whatever track you couldn't get on the iTMS.

      Same goes for the iPod. My computer has a simulated burner that creates disk images that I can then mount in a simulated CD drive. As such, I have no need to burn physical CDs in order to transcode my music to something that my iPod can use. Since I don't like obnoxious DRM, I wouldn't keep any of my music in WMA for longer than the amount of time it takes to 'burn' and re-rip it. Either that or I would intercept the audio stream and re-route it to a WAV file which is even easier to compress.

  34. Re:DAMN IT!!!! by i.r.id10t · · Score: 0

    I've been looking for a way to browse the song collections for sale without downloading and installing the software... if they have enough of what I'm interested in, I'll consider installing Windows again...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  35. The non-booting issue only effects people with... by voss · · Score: 2, Informative

    Easy Cd creator 4.x
    that have directcd installed
    as far as I can tell.

    All you have to do as far as I can
    tell is uninstall directcd before installing
    itunes which most people dont use anyway

  36. One way of making their software better by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 3, Funny

    would be to have Clippy play air-guitar while listening to music. and include even more purple color in their default skin.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:One way of making their software better by nelsonal · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd use WMP if clippy danced around and played air guitar. Just so he doesn't constantly interupt by taping on the inside of the monitor with things like "It looks like you've played several romantic songs, would you like to shop for candles." or "You have played several speed metal songs, would you like me to summon an ambulance?" or something like that.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:One way of making their software better by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 4, Funny

      "hi i'm clippy, it looks like you're playing metallica and have bittorrent installed. would you like me to ask lars to stop sobbing like a girl?"

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  37. BuyTunes by n0wak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tried to buy, er, tunes on buytunes.com once, but all I got was:

    Thank you for visiting BuyMusic.com.

    In order to take full advantage of BuyMusic.com's offerings you must be on a Windows Operating System using Internet Explorer version 5.0 or higher.


    All for using Firebird. News flash: Microsoft browser monopoly too restrictive. Asses.

    1. Re:BuyTunes by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      All for using Firebird. News flash: Microsoft browser monopoly too restrictive. Asses.

      An excellent point, n0wak.

      I questioned Apple's decision to do the 'browser within iTunes' thing, but frankly I see now that this is the only way to do it. No compatibility problems, less easy to hack, and the tunes you buy land where you want them.. in your player.

      (Although, raise of hands, all of you who went looking for the 'iTunes web site' like I did when they launched a few months ago...)

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    2. Re:BuyTunes by popeyethesailor · · Score: 1

      What other software programs apart from iTunes can be used to buy from iTMS ?

    3. Re:BuyTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Konqueror to the rescue! The "Browser Identification" feature has helped me more than once with over-restrictive homepages. BuyMusic.com works fine if you let Konqueror say you're using IE6.0 on Win XP.

    4. Re:BuyTunes by Octagon+Most · · Score: 1

      What other software programs apart from iTunes can be used to buy from iTMS ?

      The other version of iTunes (e.g., Mac or Windows, whichever you are not using). That's it.

      As per the comment above that's the way it should be. No browser incompatibilities. No IE lock-in. Is there really "choice" in music services if all the services require MS IE 5.0?

    5. Re:BuyTunes by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      Well, http://www.itunes.com/ works now.

    6. Re:BuyTunes by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      > Konqueror to the rescue! The "Browser Identification" feature has helped me more than
      > once with over-restrictive homepages. BuyMusic.com works fine if you let Konqueror say you're
      > using IE6.0 on Win XP.

      For what it is worth, Opera (F12 key, quick access) and Mozilla (after installing Multizilla, which everybody should be using anyway) do that, as well. You can also edit the prefs.js to get Netscape 4.x to do it (but you should instead just upgrade to Mozilla or Opera). The only problem with spoofing in Mozilla is that it can sometimes confuse the Java VM, which apparently asks for your browser ID before running an applet. Aargh.

      --
      -JC

    7. Re:BuyTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is there really "choice" in music services if all the services require MS IE 5.0?"

      Yes.

      Is there really choice in supermarkets if all supermarkets require you to pay with US Dollars?

  38. Slashdot is a single source by 11223 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Microsoft today warned users of the danger of OSDN's Slashdot service, saying it was a single source for dup articles that would never satisfy the needs of Windows users. "Our users are accustomed to reading their dups from a variety of MSNBC and Slate-carrying services, but Slashdot is a single source for its own dups," claimed Microsoft CEO Steve Monkeyballs.

    Analysts noted that Slashdot, despite obtaining over 1 million page views in its first week, will have a hard time with the Windows market. "We believe that an open system like Microsoft's is the way to go," claimed the Garter Belt Group.

  39. More interesting by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is that Microsoft is already being checked up on for their upcoming music service:

    http://www.salon.com/tech/wire/2003/10/20/microsof t/index.html.

    Microsoft's idea of "choice" is a button on the side that reads "Buy Music Online". Even if you tell the system "I prefer another browser to yours", or "I prefer another media player to yours", you get sent to the "Microsoft Music Store".

    No way to override that unless you manually start up a separate program to begin with. Looks like you can't just delete that little button from the OS.

    Imagine the phone call when some irate customer calls Apple and says "I clicked this Buy Music Button on my computer and I can't play it with this iTunes thing! What kind of scam are you pulling!"

    Ah, yes - Microsoft, that bastion of choice and freedom! (Well, as long as you choose a Microsoft solution, of course.)

    1. Re:More interesting by Dunark · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      One settlement provision allows Microsoft's own programs to launch only if rival software "fails to implement a reasonable technical requirement."

      So, is reinforcing Microsoft's monopoly a reasonable technical requirement?

  40. Subscribe? by edw · · Score: 2, Informative

    To the iTunes Music Store? There is no subscription fee. The only risk you run is that you need to keep iTunes installed on your computer in order to play pruchased music. Or, you could buy an iPod. Or, you could burn and then re-rip the music, which of course carries a quality penalty unless you rip to a lossless format.

    1. Re:Subscribe? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      No. To /.

      You know, what I am bitching about in my parent post?

  41. irony no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    why dont i see any criticism for
    apple$ software with apple only product use.
    microsoft products at least work with other
    vendor products, not only their own hardware (MS from what i know does not have any hardware). I find slashdots criticisms blatantly hypocritical. If MS had MSTunes with wma only music being sold there would be no sympathy on this board. But what makes you people support apple so blindly. makes no sense to me. We should essentially be critical of ALL propietary non-free things.

    I'm supporting MS here, cause at least they dont sell MS hardware. Apple sells their crap on their own hardware. They monopolize more so than MS.
    What IRONY ? MS monopolizes only the software windows end, so what?. Apple monopolizes everything, hardware, software, periperhal products, retail (Apple Stores).
    yeah flamebait me, I dont care.

    1. Re:irony no. by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can see your point, and I agree to some degree.

      The difference is that you don't have to use AAC if you don't plan on buying from the iTMS.

      You can use iTunes with mp3/aiff/wav with no problems and it works with just about any portable music player out there. My friend uses his Rio with iTunes on the Mac for example.

      If you want to buy music from the store then you're limited to iTunes (or Quicktime) and the iPod but how is this different from buying DRM-ed music in WMA format? You're limited to Windows Media Player and a portable machine that supports it (ok, so there are more of those available).

      I couldn't play WMA music with DRM on my Mac becase I don't have a version of Windows Media Player that supports it (Microsoft delightfully decided not to update the Mac version of WMP so we can't play any videos or music encoded in version 9 format - how's that for choice?!).

      Any competing service is going to contian some limitations as to what you can and can't use and can and can't do. It's the nature of things. Remember, both Apple and Microsoft are out to make money. The iTunes Music Store and iTunes exists primarily to sell iPods - Apple are a hardware company first and foremost.

      You only use Apple software if you want to use their hardware, that's the way it's always been. iTunes for Windows is there as a resource for owners of iPods who use Windows and not Mac OS. If you don't have an iPod you have three choices:

      1. Use iTunes but don't buy any music from the iTMS, ensure you rip in mp3 format and use any portable player on the market.

      2. Use iTunes with an iPod - buy music from the iTMS and rip in either mp3 or AAC format.

      3. Don't use iTunes. No one is forcing you, and it's not the law to do so (although the way things are going it might soon be illegal to use anything but WMP... just kidding)

    2. Re:irony no. by Blob+Pet · · Score: 1

      If you read the article more closely (and some of the comments), you'd notice there is mention of the fact that there are certain restrictions to Apple's service. I don't see any blind support for Apple. So calm down, Anonymous Coward.

      The point is MS is criticizing Apple for doing what MS would love to do but has failed miserably at. MS has no interest in "choice" and you know it.

      Even though MS doesn't make hardware they've adversely affected hardware by forcing their OS onto OEMs and preventing competing OSes from having any chance. This has the effect of slowing down the progress of hardware because only MS-supported hardware will quickly succeed.

      I don't use Apple products because of their closed nature, but I'd hardly call them monopolistic - especially not at the level MS has shown.

      --
      "...today consumers have been conditioned to think of beer when they see a bullfrog..."
    3. Re:irony no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not going to waste my time replying to this in depth. Simply stated, your viewpoint is wrong for far too many reasons to list here and you should try to figure out why yourself.

    4. Re:irony no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really sound like a troll, but what the hell, I have to wait for something to finish and I have a few minutes to kill.

      why dont i see any criticism for apple$ software with apple only product use.

      becuase the apple products use open file formats, that anyone can make use of. While the AAC/mp4 format is not commonly used, it is an open standard and anyone can write a program to record or play them.

      microsoft products at least work with other vendor products, not only their own hardware (MS from what i know does not have any hardware).
      ipods play mp3 and mp4 files. what is the problem?
      Don't like the restrictions of mp4? burn it to cd, then rip it to mp3. it will take you about 5 mouse clicks and 3 minutes.

    5. Re:irony no. by BDew · · Score: 1

      you mis-understand the concept of a monopoly.

      Apple's service is analogous to, say, buying a car from Nissan. You wouldn't expect that Nissan would have to engineer their car so that it could accept parts from Ford or GM or Kia. This is ok, though, because you can buy a Ford or GM car if you prefer that system.

      The problem with Microsoft is the way they tie everything into their OS. Unfortunately, following the same analogy, MS OSes are like the road system. Sure you can offroad in certain areas, especially if you are an enthusiast, but to conduct your normal day-to-day business most people need to at least interface with the roads. This is a monopoly, not one system amongst others.

      MS's monopoly on the OS should not be allowed to leverage their position in other areas. For example, their OS should not include a "Buy Music Now" button that forces people into a specific solution.

      PS: Apple does not incorporate peripherals into their system... at least, my buslink Ext HD, Canon printer, Canon scanner, Nikon Digital Camera, logitech mouse, SmartDisk External CD drive, Buslink flash memory device, and PNY flash card reader don't seem to think so.
      And the folks at MicroCenter or online at MacWarehouse would like to think that they are part of the retail sector as well.
      And while we are at it, you can run linux on Mac hardware. Soooo... it seems that Apple Computer Inc is a hardware company, which supports its hardware with software, but allows you to choose other solutions if you wish!

      --
      "Fifty million Americans can't be wrong," said Rep. Billy Tauzin. Gore - 50,999,897 Bush - 50,456,002
    6. Re:irony no. by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but I honestly don't care. I buy Apple because I love their products. I type this response in Safari, on OS X 10.2, on my 17" G4 Powerbook, while iTunes plays music I bought off iTMS, and I'm perfectly satisfied.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    7. Re:irony no. by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      Eh, but the thing is, MS DOES allow choice when it comes to music through their player. You can choose from several different premium content providers. They don't (yet) even run their own service. MS seems to be more interested in promoting their DRM than trying to monopolize as a music retailer/hardware solution. And honestly, whats wrong with that? Obviously DRM sucks and the world would be a better place without it, but get used to it. It's happening. It will continue to happen. We're stuck with it. So as a commercial enterprise why is it so wrong for MS to promote their technology? It's not wrong for Apple to promote theirs?

      Again, I totally disagree that MS is against choice in this situation. Yes, they hold huge market shares, but technically they aren't a monopoly. And MS hasn't made any move towards nor have they breathed a word about such a notion as having a vertical market in online music distribution.

      Hmm, while I'm ranting I think I'll mention this in response to others accusations of 'monopoly' against MS for forcing use of IE in conjunction with premium services in WMP. Give me a break. The fact that IE is integrated makes it that much easier to use when navigating the stores. Of COURSE they're going to use their own browser technology when integrating web content into their media player. In what way would it make sense to not use their IE rendering libraries and instead adapt some way to use the rendering engine of whatever the preferred browser is? For one, this currently isn't possible. There isn't a standardized way of exposing a browser rendering engine for use by 3rd parties. How come no one is whining that iTMS for Windows uses the IE libraries to render its store? (Yes, its all web based, another poster above went into greater detail). It sounds to me like there are way too many people just looking for some reason to point fingers at the Big Bad Bill.

      Also, the 'blind support' mr. AC was mentioning above wasn't in the article, but rather in the FUD that all of the anti-MS zealots like to crawl out of the woodwork and spread.

      I personally have tried both iTMS and WMP9/Napster2 and stuck with Napster2. I download way more than 10 songs a month so the subscription is totally worth it for me. Not to mention that the main 2 places that I listen to music are at work on my laptop and at home on my desktop. I have one subscription and just download in one place then copy the files to the other. The licenses update themselves nicely and I'm happy. I really like having the ability to pay a flat fee for downloads then if I do decide I want to use a song somewhere other than my pc I buy it for a buck or buy the album for $10. Granted iTunes is overall a better jukebox, but for me iTMS just doesn't make sense to use when I'm perfectly satisfied with the features/services behind WMP9. Suum cuique.

      I realize there's a good chance that I'll be flamed for my opinion but its just that, my opinion. Take it for what you will. However me 'sticking' up for MS somewhat is by no means a troll or flamebait, just my .02

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    8. Re:irony no. by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      For example, their OS should not include a "Buy Music Now" button that forces people into a specific solution.

      Why??? Give me ONE good reason WHY it shouldn't have such a button? Has ease-of-use been totally tossed out the window with the advent of the open-source movement? So what if MS is biased towards their own services with their OS. It would be STUIPD of them to advertise competitors services with their OS. It's called business. MS plays that game very well.

      For that same reason I think the 'monopolistic practices' judgement against MS regarding IE is hogwash. The entire time it was just Netscape whining that MS made a better product and more people used it. Yes MS undercut Netscape's business, it happens every day. It's called a capitalistic society. Yes MS made it extremely easy to just use IE instead of a 3rd party solution. In my opinion it would be a poor design decision in their OS to do anything but. KDE has a default web browser. MacOS has their own default web browser. But when Windows includes their browser with the OS its antitrust. Looking back now on the 'include a browser with the OS thing' it was nothing but starting a trend. What development team in their right mind would ship an OS nowadays without a web browser ready to use out of the box. "Hey, lets make our operating system harder to use because Netscape likes to whine." Who's bright idea was it to create a business plan off charging for a web browser anyways? The instant I paid for Netscape 2.0 I thought to myself that this is a stupid idea. Unfortuantely at the time there really wasn't much of a choice. (Mosaic? Hah!) I'm of the opinion that if MS hadn't stirred up some competition in browser market that the web would be a very stagnant place to visit. (Although, as a web developer it pisses me off that now that they've won the war they've scrapped innovation in favor of the status quo.)

      No one would whine if Apple put in a 'Buy Music Now' and the only choice by clicking that button was their distro service. Oh wait, they already did. Its called iTunes.

      To give you another example, have you ever used the 'Print these pictures online' button in WinXP? It's rather handy. Granted, MS is directly associated with 1 of the 3 choices of online print shops and I'm willing to bet that they get kickbacks from the other 2, but regardless its convenient. As I recall Apple does something similar (and probably has been doing so longer) and I'd also be willing to bet that the services they point you to give them revenue in one form or another. Also keep in mind that MS's Print Online 'Button' is extensible. Gallery does just that and allows WinXP users to publish right to their photo gallery from their desktop. (Quick plug: If you're looking for a web-based photo gallery, there is no better choice than Gallery. Check it out.) So knowing that MS has allowed extensibility in the past and has not 'forced' you to use only a specific set of service providers for media type applications if they ever did put a 'Buy Music Now' button on the desktop what would make you think they would limit it to their (as yet non-existant) service without giving a choice?

      MS OSes are like the road system. Sure you can offroad in certain areas, especially if you are an enthusiast, but to conduct your normal day-to-day business most people need to at least interface with the roads.

      How is that any different than MacOS? Out of the box its (allegedly) a 'complete' package. Joe Sixpack would be perfectly happy browsing the IntarWeb and checking his spam with what comes with the OS. Maybe a personal finance manager and a game or two. The problem is that there was a paradigm shift a few years back on what an OS is and you missed it. We're not using DOS anymore. The OS isn't just the shell that you run your programs from anymore. Its become an entire package and what's wrong with th

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    9. Re:irony no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      macOS wtfpwnz j00

      gfys
      kthxferplayin

  42. Laugh all you want... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...but unless the users see through this, MS might just gain the upper hand. Yes, yes, it's all FUD, we know, but do the users know? These are the same users who upgrade just because something is newer, and when their 'net connection dies, they call the helpdesk saying "My Microsoft is broken".

    Apple needs to fight this with some powerful prime-time adverisements. (Like they did for the "Switch" campaign, except without the annoying chick). They need to remind users that iTunes can play any MP3s (and WAV files), and their iPods can be used to take their entire CD collection on the road with them - not just purchased music from the iTunes Music store. (Heck, that was one of the major reasons why I bought one - you can easily press "Next track" on the iPod while driving, but it's hard to change CDs, and CD changers are expensive and only hold 6-10 CDs).

    Apple also needs to do more plugging on the fact that users can burn any number of plain vanilla audio CDs containing their purchased tracks. (You can only burn the same _playlist_ 10 times if it contains purchased tracks, but you can burn the tracks themselves any number of times. The playlist restriction is to prevent you from downloading an album, making a playlist of that album, and burning 50 copies and selling/giving them to your friends. And really, that's not unreasonable - would you do that with CDs you purchased?)

    --
    There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    1. Re:Laugh all you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The playlist restriction is to prevent you from downloading an album, making a playlist of that album, and burning 50 copies and selling/giving them to your friends.
      1. Burn playlist to vanilla audio CD
      2. Copy audio CD 50 times
      3. ...
      4. Profit!
    2. Re:Laugh all you want... by slashd'oh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      you can easily press "Next track" on the iPod while driving, but it's hard to change CDs, and CD changers are expensive and only hold 6-10 CDs

      I own a large-capacity portable and I think an oft-overlooked feature is the ability to shuffle your entire collection, not just one, two, or ten discs. Plus, there's practically no delay between the tracks as opposed to waiting for the cd-player to change discs. I love the ability to just press play and hear a tune I hadn't thought of in a long while.

      Now, I just wish my player had a rating system like the iPod!

    3. Re:Laugh all you want... by lune+tns · · Score: 1

      As a former first level technical assistance specialist, I'd like to state that I have never heard "My Windows is broken." The actual phrase used is "My Internet is broken."

      Thank you.

    4. Re:Laugh all you want... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0

      ...but unless the users see through this, MS might just gain the upper hand. Yes, yes, it's all FUD, we know, but do the users know?

      "We" don't know jack, apparently. You may not like the messenger, but the message is absolutely true. Apple IS selling a mechanism that locks you into Apple. If you buy from the iTunes store, you are locked into Apple. That's been Apple's strategy from day 1, and is one of the reasons I detest Apple.

      Give Microsoft some credit. They may try and lock you into the operating system, but your choices past that are rich and varied. Microsoft is smart enough to know that the reason they have a dominant O/S marketshare is because of the vast third party software market.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:Laugh all you want... by dema · · Score: 1

      and their iPods can be used to take their entire CD collection on the road with them - not just purchased music from the iTunes Music store.

      I very much agree with that. Pretty much all my friends (that are Windows users) seem to think all iTunes is is a music store, and nothing else.

    6. Re:Laugh all you want... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 1
      Apple IS selling a mechanism that locks you into Apple. If you buy from the iTunes store, you are locked into Apple. That's been Apple's strategy from day 1, and is one of the reasons I detest Apple.

      Other player manufacturers are free to include AAC support. It's, like, an open standard. They just choose not to. Also, the Audiobooks offered via the iTMS are from audible.com, which has their own player, which does the DRM stuff, in addition to the iPod. The only reason other players don't support AAC files are because other manufacturers haven't bothered yet.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    7. Re:Laugh all you want... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So Reality Master 101 sez:

      "Apple IS selling a mechanism that locks you into Apple."

      What the goddamn fucking fuck are you talking about?

      I own a Macintosh. Save for the OS, all my software is from third parties.

      And as for music purchased from iTMS, if you expected the RIAA to allow Apple to sell music with no DRM of any kind, you are too stupid to live. I suppose that the WMA files that only play on WMP9 is fundementally better than the Apple AAC format? Yes, you ARE too stupid to live. Please die, now!

      Go drink some more of the MicroSoft Kool-Ade. Oh, and again, please die, now!

      Thank you.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    8. Re:Laugh all you want... by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is smart enough to know that the reason they have a dominant O/S marketshare is because of the vast third party software market.

      Microsoft has done everything in their power to destroy the WIndows third party software market.

      Peace be with you,
      -jimbo

    9. Re:Laugh all you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The playlist restriction is to prevent you from downloading an album, making a playlist of that album, and burning 50 copies and selling/giving them to your friends

      I thought the point of it was to stop you from burning 11 cds to sell to your friends?

    10. Re:Laugh all you want... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I like "My computer dosn't have the internet on it".

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  43. Re:Why do the English have disgusting teeth? by smiley2billion · · Score: 1

    "Back to your Double Plus Good Edumacation School with you." Watch out, I have a degree from there. Go Bobcats.

  44. Stupid Itunes questions by essaunders · · Score: 1

    Ok. So apple has the AAC and you can only purchase (for use in iTunes) from apple, but can't you take the purchased files and either burn to CD as as standard CDaudio file or convert to a (lower quality than the AAC perhaps) MP3? Or did apple keep the only playback option the AAC format?

    1. Re:Stupid Itunes questions by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Absolutely. I've downloaded AAC files, burned them to CD to play in my car, and ripped the CDs to mp3s to play on winamp at work. Works like a charm. All told, iTunes is a lot more flexible than the microsoft software.

    2. Re:Stupid Itunes questions by reustp · · Score: 2, Informative

      The purchased iTMS files can be burned to CD as a standard CD audio file. They cannot be automatically converted to MP3, you can however rip the CD you burned to mp3 format if you wish. Some quality will be lost of course, however (I'm not an audiophile mind you) I've found the music to be quite acceptable even after it has been ripped from CD.

    3. Re:Stupid Itunes questions by cosmo7 · · Score: 4, Informative

      iTunes plays, rips and burns MP3s as well as AAC. AAC is employed for the DRM, making possible distribution deals with the major labels. The iPod plays both MP3s and AACs.

      Microsoft is disconcerted because Apple is not using WMA.

    4. Re:Stupid Itunes questions by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the AACs that iTunes rips are not DRM'd or copyprotected. I ripped a bunch of CDs over the weekend on my shiny new Powerbook as AACs and played them under Linux just fine with mplayer.

  45. IBM warned about being "locked in to open systems" by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Subject line really says all... in the early nineties, IBM had a bit of a campaign on to caution managers about this danger.

  46. iTunes can't play WMA by mblase · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft's #1 complaint, although unspoken, is that while iTunes can play downloaded MP3s, it can't play the DRM'ed WMA files that Microsoft promotes. In that sense, it's at odds with Microsoft's designs. Songs downloaded from iTMS only play on iTunes and iPod players, while WMA songs downloaded from other legal services can't and probably never will.

    In that sense, it's iTMS vs. every other MS-sponsored service, and iPods vs. every other MS-sponsored player. However, Apple hasn't closed the format. It's just as possible for other download services and MP3 player manufacturers to support AAC just like iTMS and the iPod do. They simply don't at this time.

    1. Re:iTunes can't play WMA by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

      Well something in the plans for Winamp is support for AAC encoded files. The AOL folks are known to be integrating support into the AOL client and 'AOL Media Player' for this sort of thing as well. With AAC being an open standard, it is likely that we'll soon see many media players supporting AAC.

    2. Re:iTunes can't play WMA by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      Do a google search for "winamp AAC", you'll see a few existing AAC plugins for winamp. I've used one the play AAC files ripped by iTunes.

    3. Re:iTunes can't play WMA by GreatTeacherMusashi · · Score: 1

      only the ripped ones though, the store-bought still use that nasty .m4p nastiness iirc (haven't tried it myself but that's what I understood, correct me?)

      --
      You win battles by knowing the enemy's timing, and using a timing which the enemy does not expect. Miyamoto Musashi
    4. Re:iTunes can't play WMA by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      Yep, you can only play ripped ones.

    5. Re:iTunes can't play WMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Songs downloaded from iTMS only play on iTunes and iPod players, while WMA songs downloaded from other legal services can't and probably never will.

      But, right from iTunes, you can convert (not Raster Image Process (RIP) the file, jeez I hate hearing people say they've RIPped an audio file, it makes no sense at all) the iTunes purchased songs into WAV, AIFF, or MP3 which will play on any player or audio file organizer/player.

  47. FYI by snarkh · · Score: 1

    irony (def 3b), Merriam-Webster:
    incongruity between a situation developed in a drama and the accompanying words or actions that is understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play

    1. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the world's a stage.

  48. Well by hartba · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All your music are belong to us! It had to be done..... eventually.

    --
    60 percent of the time, my comments are right everytime.
  49. The best endorsement for iTunes yet. by smartin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the evil empire immediately reacts to something like iTunes you know that they are scared of it. M$ starting a FUD campaign the day after the service is released totally legitimizes it in the market place. I'd be willing to bet that this helped spur the sale of 1 million tunes in the first 3 days. I know it inspired me to buy some.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:The best endorsement for iTunes yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was inspired to buy because it was so easy. Not to mention now I can justify buying all those songs from one-hit-wonders that I will never admit to listening to anyway!

  50. question of credibility by GerbilSocks · · Score: 0, Funny

    I don't hold much stock in a company that also brought to you -- Microsoft BOB.

  51. iTunes and Wine by moorg · · Score: 1

    Anybody had any luck getting iTunes for Windows running in Wine?

    I get an InstallShield error:

    1155: File F:\installs\itunes\INSTMSIA.EXE not found.

    I'm using the 20031016 RPM release.

    1. Re:iTunes and Wine by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Try installing in Windows then running just the EXE

      Dumb, but I think it works best...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    2. Re:iTunes and Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That file is a "Windows Installer" or something of the sort. I remember having to download a new one when I went to update office. Check for it on the Microsoft Website.

  52. Um... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't this article incredibly redundant? The last article linked to Microsoft's comments on iTunes. People already discussed it.

    What more is there to say? Should everyone just repost their comments from yesterday? Or was this just another Microsoft-flamebait-for-page-hits article?

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:Um... by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
      Well, maybe they thought it was worthy of further discussion. Whatever.

      I didn't see it yesterday, and I find it pretty interesting that Microsoft would have the gall to make such ridiculous statements.

      The fact is, Microsoft is being extremely hypocritical. That's certainly something a lot of people here are interested in discussing.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    2. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Register is more amusing than MacCentral and a bit more informative.

    3. Re:Um... by shotfeel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find it pretty interesting that Microsoft would have the gall to make such ridiculous statements.

      Not just ridiculous, outright false.

      If iTunes only works with music from the tTMS, whatever have those Mac people been doing with the program for the last 4(?) years? And I guess those people walking around with iPods have just been listening to static.

    4. Re:Um... by ceeam · · Score: 2, Funny

      While generally I agree there is still an issue of some people _not_checking_ SlashDot every hour (or even every day for that matter). It's like complaining about TV: "Shit, they still show the same news in 9pm program that they did in 7pm program, bastards". ;)

      PS: (Pre)Moderation for the stories, now!! :-)

    5. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't every single one of your messages incredibly redundant?

      If you don't have anything new to say, don't bother saying anything. We get the point already.

    6. Re:Um... by markh1967 · · Score: 0
      I find it pretty interesting that Microsoft would have the gall to make such ridiculous statements.

      Not just ridiculous, outright false.

      Actually, it seems that it is true. I installed it last night and saw the following in the readme file that is displayed while installing:

      Important: After installing iTunes 4.1 for Windows, you'll only be able to transfer music to your iPod using iTunes. To transfer music from MusicMatch Jukebox or Audible Manager to your iPod, you'll need to first import the music into iTunes. For more information, search iTunes and Music Store Help.

      Incidently, I remembered seeing this but had to reinstall the program to view it again; it seems that I'm expected to remember the licensing agreement without ever being able to read it again or refer back to it if I want to check the conditions.

      --
      Input error. Replace user and press any key to continue.
    7. Re:Um... by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. ;)

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    8. Re:Um... by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Users not checking Slashdot hourly is perfectly acceptable.

      Editors not knowing that the article was posted yesterday, however, is NOT acceptable. Keeping dupes out is their job.

  53. Just FUD by QuackQuack · · Score: 1
    "Unless Apple decides to make radical changes to their service model, a Windows-based version of iTunes will still remain a closed system, where iPod owners cannot access content from other services. Additionally, users of iTunes are limited to music from Apple's Music Store. As I mentioned earlier, this is a drawback for Windows users, who expect choice in music services, choice in devices, and choice in music from a wide-variety of music services to burn to a CD or put on a portable device,"

    Sure you have choice, you can still install the MusicMatch client, and the Napster 2.0 client (when it becomes available), and use those stores along with iTunes

    "Lastly, if you use Apple's music store along with iTunes, you don't have the ability of using the over 40 different Windows Media-compatible portable music devices. When I'm paying for music, I want to know that I have choices today and in the future,"

    This is a valid point. I can't put the songs from iTunes onto my Nomad Jukebox, unless I burn them to CD and Rip them back first. I can put the songs I buy from MusicMatch on my Nomad with no problems.

    Still this is mostly typical FUD from M$. They see online digital music sales as the next big thing, and they HATE it when the next big thing is dominated by someone else.

    But for some reason, nobody in the industry except for Apple could see the obvious business model for online digital music sales. While everyone else was fiddling with subscription models where you lose your music if you stop paying your subscription, Apple knew that users wanted to buy and keep their music, so they deserve their lead.

    --
    By reading this sig, you agree to the terms of my sig license.
    1. Re:Just FUD by RatBastard · · Score: 1
      This is a valid point. I can't put the songs from iTunes onto my Nomad Jukebox, unless I burn them to CD and Rip them back first. I can put the songs I buy from MusicMatch on my Nomad with no problems.


      And this should be no suprise at all, really. iTunes is, afterall, a tool for getting you to buy an iPod. Sure, it's a great music player that does all kinds of neat things, but it is still aimed at getting you to buy an iPod.


      Don't get me wrong, I like and use iTunes for Windows. And I want (eat brains!) an iPod.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  54. Re:oh my god TubGirl is disgusting too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yuck! you've just reminded me of that sick photo I once clicked by mistake, why on earth some people enjoy posting links to such stuff, I thought of visiting goatse.cx once to see if they have reasons for such sites / images, but then I decided not to.
    And yes, I know that images can be disabled in any browser's options.

  55. And in the bright dazzling future... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Accuse me of trolling and mod me down if you must, but you've always got to look into the future.

    Well, lez see, I'd bet Microsoft will use their OS monopoly to get a monopoly on selling music online...then I can also see since media formats have always been proprietary cept' for ogg of course, I can see the windows DRM being used with media player to restirct which formats windows can utilize. So in the distant future, we'll see that microsoft's WMA format becoming the de-facto standard amongst windows users. Stupid people will have to buy their media and probably can't rip their CD's, while smart people will use something else like linux or mac.

    Combine microsoft deciding they don't like competition from p2p apps or other formats with their autoupdating patch system and you've got them eliminating windows machines from the p2p scene altogether. Heck, they might even be brazen enough to do something like brilliant did awhile ago and use users machines as nodes in the network so they don't have to pay for bandwidth to host their website, patches, or anything else for that matter. Mmmm..viral microsoft patches....

    I don't trust apple either, they've done their share of stupid monopolistic stuff too, so it'll be interesting to see MS and apple fight.

  56. But MP3 bridges the gap! by JusTyler · · Score: 1

    iTunes (for Windows) will rip to MP3 just as well as AAC. iTunes will play MP3s just as well as AACs. The iPod can play MP3s and AACs. Windows Media Player can play Windows Media and MP3s.

    Admittedly, if you buy AACs from the iTMS, and want to get them onto your non-iPod device, you need to burn them to CD, and rip them back to MP3.. but it's not impossible by any means.

  57. Re:Go floss and brush your teeth limey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am NOT British. I am European. After that i'm Dutch, and no, not stoned.
    Actually we have a society that is at least reltively safe.

  58. Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Nit+Picker · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would like to see the selection before downloading the app, but when I have briefly gone to the site, I could see no way to browse without installing i-tunes.

    1. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by evanagee · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't bother window-shopping, this is the absolute best Mp3 manager/player there is...

    2. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Mercaptan · · Score: 1

      Nope, they don't have any web version of their catalog available. I suppose iTunesMS is a bit of a download, but the entire store really is contained within the application. Once you've got the app, browsing the catalog and listening to snippets is very easy.

      The selection itself is pretty broad, which is to say it covers most genres and popular artists. Think typical music store and then some. It's not too deep yet, but things are growing.

      --
      -- "Sucks to your ass-mar"
    3. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by BDew · · Score: 1

      Jeepers. Let's ask Apple to put their entire catalog on the web, just to save you the inconvenience of a free download and install (which can be undone)? What would the point of putting all the song names on the web be exactly? You still wouldn't be able to get them without installing iTunes... which is Apple's entire reason for doing this.

      --
      "Fifty million Americans can't be wrong," said Rep. Billy Tauzin. Gore - 50,999,897 Bush - 50,456,002
    4. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      So, download the app. It's a free download, and doesn't obligate you to anything. You don't have to migrate your music library, you don't have to make it your default player, you don't have to provide billing information.

      Heck, you don't even have to give Apple any information at ALL to download the app. Just click the download button. How refreshing is that? For once, a company that doesn't require you to tell them all sorts of personal crap and fill out a survey just to download a free or try before you buy app.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    5. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by schmink182 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I, for one, agree with you that it would be nice to know what you're getting into before downloading. I'm not sure why everyone is so up-in-arms about letting you see what the selection is, but it seems like a legitimate complaint. If you have a very specific taste in music, for example, it could just be a waste of time downloading and installing iTunes just to uninstall it a few minutes later.

    6. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by John_Booty · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope, they don't have any web version of their catalog available. I suppose iTunesMS is a bit of a download, but the entire store really is contained within the application.

      Haha, not quite. The iTunes music store is actually just regular web pages. If you use a tool like netstat (or better yet, TCPView from www.sysinternals.com) you can watch iTunes make a bunch of HTTP requests to Apple's servers when you browse each page in the store. If you use something like Process Explorer (this is turning into a Sysinternals commercial!) you can see that iTunes references the standard Internet Explorer HTML rendering engine to render the pages.

      Apple presumably has something in place on the pages to ensure that only iTunes can access them. iTunes probably just sends some encrypted header doo-dad along with the normal HTTP request headers so that their webservers know that it's iTunes who's requesting the pages and not another web browser. If I wasn't lazy I'd fire up Etherreal and see exactly what's going on.

      I'm sure with a little effort and header spoofing you could fairly easily access those pages with the web browser of your choice, although I can't think of any possible benefit to doing so. :P

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    7. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by badasscat · · Score: 1, Troll

      Heck, you don't even have to give Apple any information at ALL to download the app. Just click the download button. How refreshing is that? For once, a company that doesn't require you to tell them all sorts of personal crap and fill out a survey just to download a free or try before you buy app.

      Of course, who knows what info iTunes is sending Apple on its own? By default, iTunes installs a service called "iTuneshelper.exe" that runs as a TSR even when iTunes is closed. I'm sorry, but not being the sort to trust companies that are admittedly in league with the RIAA, this makes me a little bit paranoid (even though all my MP3's are ripped from legally purchased CD's). This service goes away if you uncheck "connect to the Internet when needed", but why is this checked by default to begin with? There is a separate checkbox for "update iTunes automatically", so what else is iTunes doing when connected to the net? (btw, the music store works whether or not "connect to the internet when needed" is checked - so it has nothing to do with that.)

      iTunes also installs two other services that are useless for most people running Windows - iPodservice.exe and gearsec.exe. It does this without permission as well, and these can only be turned off by disabling the services themselves, not within iTunes. Neither of these is required in any sense for running iTunes itself.

      All in all, I'm about as pleased with iTunes as I am with Windows Media Player from a privacy/permissions standpoint. Which is to say not much.

    8. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by discstickers · · Score: 2, Informative

      CDDB

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    9. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by John_Booty · · Score: 1

      I just realized that when you said that iTMS was "contained" within the application, you were probably speaking from a functional point of view and not a technical one and my post was therefore totally superfluous.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    10. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by cshotton · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm sorry, but not being the sort to trust companies that are admittedly in league with the RIAA...

      This bit of demogoguery is over the top. To say that a company who goes to the trouble to create the first practical, usable on-line music store for digital content, and does so completely in the context of the current laws and business climate we find ourselves stuck with, is "in league with RIAA" is like saying devlopers of WINE are in league with Microsoft or developers of a x86 Linux kernel are in league with Intel. Apple took all the tools they had to work with and made a solution that seems to work for all parties involved. Unless you can propose a more appropriate, successful, and LEGAL alternative, you should go peddle your conspiracies and new world orders elsewhere.

      --

      Shut up and eat your vegetables!!!
    11. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's kind of a pain to find that once you've installed the app on a machine that supposedly exceeds their minimum specifications and then shut down everything except the app... it slows your machine down to nothing and you STILL can't browse their store. After waiting ten minutes for it to shut down, waste some more time uninstalling it. If I'm going to buy new hardware to run a piece of software, it better be something more than a media player/music store.

      Why not just do a damned store and let me download stuff? Why tie it to your app? Emusic, here I come.

    12. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Mercaptan · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's right, I was mainly thinking from the functional point of view. Technically, I'm sure it is mostly off-the-shelf tech they're using to serve up the catalog. But as you said, the benefit of digging out the content that make up the catalog is pretty much nil.

      --
      -- "Sucks to your ass-mar"
    13. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

      iTunes Music Store "pages" are really text/XML streams, if I recall correctly.

      Anyone got a good link for more info?

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    14. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They could use your posts in moderator school. Your first one was informative, but your second one is insightful.

    15. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      Jeepers. Let's ask Apple to put their entire catalog on the web, just to save you the inconvenience of a free download and install

      Does iTunes work under Wine?

    16. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by John_Booty · · Score: 1

      iTunes Music Store "pages" are really text/XML streams, if I recall correctly. Anyone got a good link for more info? Sure! http://www.ethereal.com/download.html :P

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    17. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you're on dial up, my sympathies. If your not, you deserve a swift kick.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    18. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Of course, who knows what info iTunes is sending Apple on its own? By default, iTunes installs a service called "iTuneshelper.exe" that runs as a TSR even when iTunes is closed.

      If you're concerned about this, what does your firewall show that it's doing? Even the free ZoneAlarm will tell you things such as "program (blah) is trying to send data to (blah)".

      Your concerns regarding iTunes seem to be that you don't know what (if anything) it's sending out, which is a supremely easy thing to check, and that it comes with some options you don't want, and you're further expanding your "I don't know, and I apparently haven't bothered to check" to privacy concerns. Concerns are fine; go check it out & see what, if anything, it's sending where.

    19. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPodservice.exe is to launch iTunes whenver you dock your iPod.

      gearsec.exe is for the CD-Burning capability. You can switch it's startup to "mannual"

      You can actually deactivate all three services without loosing any real functionality in iTunes. I am dissapointed that so many processes get installed with iTunes, but none of them is particularly scary or parasitic.

      I have had a very favorable experience with iTunes, and would highly recomend to any one to check it out (even without using the iTunes Music Store)

    20. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, or at least there used to be. Tried out this hint on macosxhints.com when it first appeared, should still work.
      The guys over at nslog.com have discovered how to search the Apple Music Store directly. This is very cool! Hope they don't mind me reprinting the info. The basic URL looks like this:

      itms://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZsearch .woa/wa/com.apple.jingle.
      search.DirectAction/advancedsearchResults?...


      Note that the above should be one line (no extra spaces; shown on two to narrow the display), and you enter your search term instead of the "...". Click on the link and it will open in iTunes. For example, to search for "Maggie's Farm" by Bob Dylan, you'd use songTerm=Maggie's Farm&artistTerm=Bob Dylan as the search terms after the question mark (depending on your browser, you may have to use %20 instead of the spaces). Click this link for a clickable link test.

      Rather than steal the glory of nslog in discovering this, I would recommend you visit the nslog.com site as linked above for more detailed info. Be sure and look at the Last Played page that apparently lists the last played items on their iTunes, and they have changed the links to be clickable links to the Apple Music Store.

    21. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are indeed that paranoid about using software from companies "in league with the RIAA," why are you using Windows?

    22. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by jafac · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      " (this is turning into a Sysinternals commercial!)"

      yeah, that'll happen on exactly the day that Sysinternals starts shipping products for platforms other than Windows. /bitter (and no, the Linux version of Filemon does not work with any recent version of Linux).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    23. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by John_Booty · · Score: 1

      I assume that if one was using iTunes for Windows, one would be able to run other Windows applications. Is it possible that iTunes runs under WINE, but the Sysinternals tools don't? That seems odd.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    24. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Demolition · · Score: 2, Informative

      This page has a bit of info about the way the iTMS is set up, and possibly some ways to search it without using iTunes.

      D.

    25. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to "window shop" before downloading a FREE application? Dude, that is the pinnacle of cheapness. If you don't like it, uninstall it and be on your way. You're not required to purchase any music from the store at all.

    26. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by AllInOne · · Score: 1

      I used Interarchy to sniff this out.

      iTunes says this:

      GET /storeBag.xml.gz HTTP/1.1
      User-Agent: iTunes/4.1 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.3)
      Accept-Language: en-us, en;q=0.50
      Accept-Encoding: gzip, x-aes-cbc
      Connection: close
      Host: phobos.apple.com

      iTMS replies like this:

      TH_PUSH TH_ACK
      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Accept-Ranges: bytes
      Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:34:23 GMT
      Content-Length: 569
      Content-Type: text/xml
      Connection: close
      Server: Apache/1.3.27 (Darwin)
      Last-Modified: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:41:55 GMT
      ETag: "916605-239-3f8cd013"
      Content-Encoding: x-gzip
      Via: 1.1 netcache01 (NetCache NetApp/5.2.1R2D2)

      And in fact you can point your browser at this url and get the XML:

      http://017.250.248.150/storeBag.xml.gz

      for me, in Safari, the resulting file is downloaded to the desktop rather than displayed, but this is merely a matter of filetype settings I believe.

      It appears to me that there is nothing to prevent other browsers from visiting the iTMS assuming that they could handle/decompress/parse the xml.gz files.

    27. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by zachdms · · Score: 1

      Kinda OT, but WMP9 should answer most/all privacy/permissions issues & requests. What's still outstanding in your eyes?

    28. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by grosa · · Score: 0

      judging by the success of the iTunes music store (yes, people will pay for music on the internet), i wonder how long it'll take for someone to hack up a quick and dirty clone using the gecko engine or similar.

      question is: will apple sue something that increases their sales?

    29. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      absolutely, they get less than 10% of the price of each song and all their expenses have to come out of that 10%, after bandwidth cost, work in packaging the files, and gateway fees for the credit card transactions the sales the hack would increase might actually be costing them a couple pennies a pop, not making them money. Of course if the hack works with the iPOD they probably wouldn't care.

    30. Re:Is There an Easy Way to Window Shop at I-Tunes? by Demolition · · Score: 1

      An addendum to my own post:

      Apple itself has provided a method of deep-linking to songs within the iTMS. See this page.

      D.

  59. What's the Difference? by mojoNYC · · Score: 2, Interesting
    now that iTunes and the iPod are available for wintel, maybe some of the windoze dittoheads will realize there IS a difference in how Apple products work--how many times in the past have we all heard, 'bbbbbut, we also have a music player app (media player app, video editing app, etc) that does the same thing...does it really?;>

    -mojo

    1. Re:What's the Difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU, Apple "ditto-head"...

  60. Re:Bush has never lied moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, America has definitely gone mad. Even /. has been infiltrated.

  61. Wait - I was on painkillers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My earlier comment was influenced by the massive amount of painkillers I ingested after purchasing them from my maid.

    What I meant to say was "Bush has lied and I am a moron for supporting him".
    I am on my knees, but not to thank them. It is because I am getting screwed by them.

    Sorry for the confusion in my earlier post.

  62. that's a first by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think I've ever seen someone actually call Apple a monopoly, and seriously mean it, before reading this article. Is he serious? Apple a monopoly?

    I think that's the first time I've seen a monopoly with something relatively insignificant like 10% of their given market. Didn't I recently read that even linux has a higher market share than Apple?

    The fact that apple has good products, and has a very exclusive set of products that interact with each other well, has nothing to do with being a monopoly, directly.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:that's a first by The_DoubleU · · Score: 1
      I don't think I've ever seen someone actually call Apple a monopoly, and seriously mean it, before reading this article. Is he serious? Apple a monopoly?
      Well they are the only one that sell Apple's.
      --
      What power has law where only money rules.
    2. Re:that's a first by repetty · · Score: 1

      "I don't think I've ever seen someone actually call Apple a monopoly, and seriously mean it, before reading this article. Is he serious? Apple a monopoly?"

      I have. Nothing new.

      Read the article again. The author specified that Apple is a vertical monopoly, which -- arguably -- it is.

      --Richard

    3. Re:that's a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they are the only one that sell Apple's.

      Apple is a brand. There are numerous resellers that sell Apple branded products. Perhaps you meant that Apple is the only manufacturer that makes Macs. This doesn't make them a monopoly.

      Generally speaking Macs are personal computers. They are just a particular type of an implementation. You can satisfy most of your computing needs with either Windows PC or Macintosh. This means they both compete in the same market, in which Apple has less than a 5% market share.

  63. Re:The non-booting issue only effects people with. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep reading.

  64. Re:To /. by akedia · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why don't you go without your stupid Starbucks triple-mocha-frappe-latte for one damn morning and Paypal $5 to Slashdot for a subscription instead, and quit with the "I'm a GNU Linux hippy who thinks all information should be free" attitude? Then you would have the ability to see stories (including the dupes) from The Mysterious Future, and you could e-mail the editor on duty and let them know instead of coming to the comments section and whining about it. ALSO THERE'S THE WARM FUZZY FEELING.

  65. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by Gunfighter · · Score: 1

    I agree, Mr. Gates has made Microsoft one of the most successful companies of all time. That doesn't necessarily mean he doesn't need an occasional clue injection.

    Imagine how much more successful Microsoft would be if they were able to work efficiently with other companies and software developers. Unlike our good friend Mr. Stallman, I feel that proprietary software has its place in the world. Nonetheless, I don't think that vendors of proprietary software need to act like spoiled brats and refuse to get along with the rest of the world.

    If Microsoft was able to play nicely with all of the other children, we wouldn't make them sit at the front of the class next to the teacher's desk.

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
  66. WMA question by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    Now this is something I was never sure of. I've got a 18-24 month old Rio cd/mp3/wma player that has no way of updating it's software...how does/will it know about WMA9?

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:WMA question by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's simple. You'll have to buy the NEW Rio Player that has WMA9 support. Of course, the new Rio is only supported by the NEW version of Windows, so you'll have to upgrade your operating system too. By the way, the new version of Windows will require a motherboard with WMA9 DRM support, so you'll have to buy a new system too.

  67. Music choices by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Granted, Apple Music downloads are useless to anyone without iTunes (on Windows or Mac) or an iPod. Until I can play them in linux, they're useless to me. And don't tell me to burn everything to a CD and then rip it. Apple Music is also useless if you want to listen on a non-apple portable. Once again, Apple has chosen to support "everyone" by offering a choice of proprietary systems, rather than a single open system. "Windows or Mac" is just as bad as "Mac only" or "Windows only".

    You have a good point... but lets not forget that this is a new addition to the musical arena. Nothing has 'gone away'. iTunes is just another option. For a lot of people the service isn't good enough quality (lossy AAC compression at a medium bitrate)... but as Apple seems to have proven, for the vast majority, its a very attractive service.

    At the end of the day, if you don't want to use iTMS, or buy an iPod, Apple has still offered something compelling: a free jukebox player that is very powerful... even if you buy no songs or hardware. Rip your own CDs to MP3 or AAC, and burn them all you like, for free. Even WMP won't let you do that for free.

    I was a little surprised that they didn't charge a nominal fee for PC iTunes, but now I think that move was very astute.

    iTunes may not be everyone's bag but it certainly raises the bar in terms of interface design, and provides a kick in the ass to other developers. To me, that's choice. I have more musical choices under Windows than I did a week ago.

    The thing I find interesting is the loss-leader aspect of iTMS. Apple has said they make very little money from the service, What hope can dedicated services like Napster have, if Apple can offer high quality (well, Big 5) content in a premium service, and subsidize that service with iPod sales? Technically the iTMS doesn't even need to be a runaway success for Apple...

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Music choices by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      they offer 400 indie labels now, and are adding more every week,

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  68. Re:iTunes can't play WMA ~ conversely by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

    Has MS bothered to make the WMA spec available to Apple, let alone anyone else?

    I doubt it, as that would defeat their own DRM/Lock in designs.

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
  69. Future AAC support on portable players by BMonger · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, the iPod is pretty much the only player to use AAC. I wonder if the iTunes Music Store gets popular if other players will start to support AAC and then eventually get a license from Apple to play the restricted files. I know some will argue that iTunes is a way to get people to buy iPods so it'd be silly for them to license the DRM'ed AAC files but... who knows... maybe Apple is nicer than we think? Not that it matters to me... my Mac and my iPod work just fine... I've been pulled in full steam ahead already anyhow... doh!

  70. Re:Bush has never lied moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then what happened in Oklahoma City?

  71. Re:in related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently the terrorists have already won their battle against the english language.

  72. These writers are confused... by csoto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They seem to equate iTunes for Windows with the iTunes Music Service. One is a "digital jukebox," while the other is a download/rights management service. Use of the former does not require use of the latter. Only the latter entails any sort of "lack of choice," although it's the only REAL choice we've been offered. Here's what I sent to the author:

    "Why is it that you and just about every "rumor" site insists on confusing iTunes for Windows and the iTunes Music Service? Everyone claims that by installing "iTunes," you are effectively supporting an "Apple monopoly," simply because the DRM-enabled files purchased from the iTunes Music Store can only be played on iPods (or other copies of iTunes). This completely ignores the fact that iTunes is a "plain 'ol MP3 player" (and a rather nice one, at that). The ONLY time DRM comes into play is when you purchase DRM-enabled AAC files from the iTunes Music Service. That makes sense, given how music publishers are paranoid about "rights-free" music downloads. Installing iTunes for Windows (as I have done on my Dell laptop at work, and a Compaq Evo tablet) in no way locks one into Apple's DRM-enabled AAC "world." I can still encode CDs as MP3s, burn these tracks to CDs (although this Evo is so slow, that would be rather painful!), and transfer them to a cheesy MP3 flash player (so far, I've avoided them as mostly useless- I'm waiting to buy an iPod, once the new baby's expenses are met).

    So, please get it right. iTunes for Windowsb is benign. Buying tracks on iTunes Music Service may "lock you in," but what's the alternative? Choice? What choice? Buy DRM-enabled tracks from WMA-supporting sites? No thanks. Can't even play them on one of those junky WMA-enabled flash players. Talk about no choice. Apple negotiated good DRM policy on my behalf, and that's why I've spent good money on a few dozen tracks already. Getting to play them on the best "digital jukebox" out there is just a plus..."

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
    1. Re:These writers are confused... by dydxjessedydt · · Score: 1

      But... Use of the latter requires use of the former.

  73. In other words: by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
    MS complaining about the limitations of a music format with DRM. Isn't that like MS saying:

    M$: Hey pot, kettle! You're both black.
    Pot & Kettle: No shit, Sherlock.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  74. Longhorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Check this out: amabuy

    Anyway, I think we will see a radical change in the way we use Internet when Longhorn will arrive. Microsoft will probably try to tie us (us?) even more to William Henry Gates III en Steve Balder. How? By integrating all kinds of finetuned programs to search for specific thingies. Kind of Kazaa baked into Windows with a very nice UI on top of it, so you don't see the difference anymore between a webbrowser and another app. They could , for example, integrate a googlesque websearch into Windows Search Assistant, so you don't have to go to Google anymore. So, even if you want to find a book, you maybe can do a search in Search Assistant: Find book and you will get a nice list of books, rated etc. Microsoft could settle an agreement with large bookstores (amazon) so amazon provides the backend and Microsoft the frontend (Windows). Wow! Any vacancies available at Microsoft? Bill, did you read that?!

  75. iTunes vs M$ vs Napster 2.0 vs et al. by bcolflesh · · Score: 1

    ...and still Kazaa Lite K++ still works perfectly for free - http://www.kazaalite.tk/

  76. Re:in related news... by b17bmbr · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    i'm gonna hose some karma, so here goes.
    1. that you choose to ignore the fact that we are WW3, against the exact same sort of fascist minds that we were in 60 years ago is not Pres. Bush's fault.
    2. that Bush relied on the best intel available, and that the Brits still stand by their yellowcake story, and you call that a lie, which is the conscious act of deception, i can't help
    3. that everybody, even the frogs and krauts, agreed that saddam was in material breach, had WMD's, and was a major threat, and you call Bush a liar, i can't help
    4. that Bush never said saddam was an imminent threat, but said that we can't let him get that far, and you still think him a liar, i can't help.
    i shall stop there. you cannot name one lie the president told. you can claim policy differences, but not lies. are there intelligence failures? absolutely. do they need to be addressed? absolutely. but the bullshit that he somehow "lied", is pure ideological religion. it is the same religious fanaticism that drives the islamicists to blow up buildings with airplanes.
    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  77. Re:Bush has never lied moron by aliens · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt they are doing some good work keeping terrorists off of US soil.

    Oh, by the way I have this rock that prevents tiger attacks. Better get one now! There's rumors on the chatter line of possible sightings of what might be tigers with towels on their heads.

    Seriously the rock works, just buy it already. Cost of only some freedoms. What you don't want the rock? You tiger supporting anti-american communist nazi!

    Off to the Bay with ya!

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  78. Re:To /. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    Because I am not going to PAY for the ability to do the editors jobs for them.

  79. HEH - Slashdots been Googled.... by CountMoriarty · · Score: 1

    See Google news quoting Slashdot in their Sci/Tech Headlines... I wonder if the google effect is as big as the slashdot effect??

  80. and, you can export... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    FUD!!!! scream with us! aaaaahhh! iTunes is evil!!!

    yes you can burn mp3's! but sadly not ogg, nor (but not sadly) wma. it just works.

    i particularly like the way apple uses rendevous/zeroconf to network iTunes. can you say back door? excuse me m$ can you turn around so that i can kick you in the ass? thanks.

  81. Re:in related news... by log0n · · Score: 1

    amen to that! :->

  82. Lack of choices??? by jmors · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ok Microsoft, you had plenty of notice ahead of time that Apple was going to release the iTunes Music Service on the Windows platform. So, you believe it is restircted and a bad choice? Then I challenge you, Microsoft, to bring to market a truly OPEN system with a better selection. It is easy to criticise, give us something better, something that doesn't force us to use Microsoft proprietary media formats, something that really allows us to use our music puchases as we should be able to use something that we bought and OWN.

    I'd say that Apple has done an excellent job of mixing ease of use and purchase with reasonable restrictions to satisfy the music companies. So, if you can't SHOW us a truly open choice that is better, keep your FUD to yourselves!

    Thank you Apple, I think iTMS is great!

    --
    The Matrix is real... but I'm only visiting!
  83. same old pattern by kaan · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what Microsoft has proven itself to be good at - taking someone else's idea and trying to muscle their way onto the winner's podium. Whatever Microsoft releases as competition to the iTunes Music Store, it won't be product innovation at all. Instead, it will be a direct chicken-shit reaction to a great piece of work that has proven itself to be extremely popular.

    I know there are lots of smart people working for the big Redmond giant, but it's kinda stunning how they seem to be the last ones to arrive again and again and again. I guess they should stop teaching classes on how to introduce buffer overruns into their code, and focus on coming up with some good ideas (ya ya, I know they've got a huge research division that's doing all kinds of cool stuff...)

  84. Re:Bush has never lied moron by CptNerd · · Score: 1

    The first World Trade Center attack occurred when?

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  85. Quicktime 6, not iTunes by mrandre · · Score: 1

    When the iTMS first came out, before you could really do anything else, you had to get the latest version of Quicktime, because it is quicktime that handles AAC, and iTunes uses Quicktime, a point that seems lost here. Perhaps in the Windows World, the situation is a bit different, but QT for Windows exists, and I would imagine if it doesn't already, it will support AAC promptly. So all any application, mac or PC, has to do to handle AAC formatted files is support Quicktime, which is a good idea anyway, because Quicktime plays nearly everything. In fact, the blurb in Software Update for QT stated that the point of this upgrade was so that other programs than iTunes could handle AAC. So basically, this means that any program which does not support Quicktime and AAC does so because it doesn't want to, for whatever reason. As Microsoft Office (at least on the mac side) supports quicktime, this all sounds like a piss-poor argument from a piss-poor company. The tools are all out there, and Apple would be happy to help anyone make their devices/software compatible. Microsoft just wants to score marketing points sans facts, but I suppose I'm preaching to the choir on that point.

    --
    "I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to do it by not dying." -Woody Allen
  86. Re:in related news... by b-baggins · · Score: 1

    Oh, man. Kiss the Karma good-bye. This is slashdot. People don't think, here. How dare you assault them with facts.

    Oh, well. What's the point of having the karma if you can't use it periodically, eh?

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  87. Can you burn to virtual CD then rip? by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    I know that some program such as Alcohol 120% allows you to make images and then use them as virtual CD ROM drives. Can you make an image of consisting of the tunes and then ripping them without actually doing it???

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Can you burn to virtual CD then rip? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Informative

      iTunes needs to see a "CDROM loaded in a CDROM drive," meaning you can't just open up an ISO file in iTunes. If Alcohol 120% lets you create a virtual CDROM drive that iTunes will recognize as just another hardware drive, then you should be good to go.

  88. The best endorsement for Windows yet by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll

    When a Linux zealot uses every anti-Microsoft buzzword together--"evil empire," "M$," and "FUD campaign" (apparently when a company gives an opinion on anything, including competition, it's now a FUD campaign), it totally makes people stay far, far away from Linux and its immature community.

    There's gotta be some sort of record for most-used zealot buzzwords in a post.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  89. MS PR by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Does anyone else get the impression that, had Microsoft just kept its (corporate) mouth shut, we'd be debating the relative mertis and drawbacks of iTMS on an even field?...

    .. as opposed to, say, noticing that MS is being petulant, thus causing all the geeks to rise up and slap them down, saying how much better iTMS is than anything MS has put their stamp on?

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  90. My reply by natefanaro · · Score: 1

    "Unless Microsoft decides to make radical changes to their service modem, any Windows-based operating systems will still remain a closed system, where Windows owners cannot access the source code from their own machines. Additionally, the users of Windows are limited to browsers and instant messaging software. As I mentioned earlier, this is a drawback for non-borg users, who expect choice in browsers, choice in software, and choice in distros."

    1. Re:My reply by natefanaro · · Score: 1

      Doh! I meant service model, not modem.

  91. Re:Bush has never lied moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume this is meant to be ironic, is it not?

  92. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Yeah, right. If Microsoft understood open formats, they would have launched their own music download service months ago.

    I think MS does understand open formats.. and thus you have answered your own question. :)

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  93. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by b-baggins · · Score: 1

    Yep. That crappy product thrown out to entice unsuspecting users into my trap works every time. Glad I don't have to write a quality product to lure people in.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  94. can only legally purchase music from... by rootrot · · Score: 2

    FWIW, you can rip to formats other than AAC and you can certainly download and play pretty much any other format. I assume that they meant you can only "legally purchase music" from Apple's store as opposed to the much broader "you can only use itunes with music from AMS." Clearly this was a minor oversight on their part... /rr

  95. Well it is limited... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I don't see any renaissance lute music on iTunes, so I'm not interested.

    OK, the fact that I run Linux helps. A windows client isn't much use to me...

  96. Re:Bush has never lied moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glad I'm not the only one who feels like the inmates are running the assylum.

  97. Microsoft's Right! by cmoney · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WMA is supported on more devices and players than Apple's AAC (w/DRM) and the iPod.

    BUT

    WMA support is IRRELEVANT if the Digital Restrictions Management that infests Microsoft products doesn't allow me to play it anywhere else anyway. I once had a free offer to download WMA files from some music service and found that once the files were copied to any other computer, they were useless anyway. Copying to a player which did play WMAs was fruitless as well.

    So the DRM (remember it's Digital RESTRICTIONS Management) is the overriding limiting factor, and not whether WMA is supported or not.

    All the other online music services are music RENTAL right? If so, I won't participate regardless of the format.

    Microsoft's argument is irrelevant until the WMA-supporting music services offer more lenient restrictions. I don't want my music to stop after I stop paying $19/month, I don't wanna have to worry if I bought the correct license to burn to CD for every single track I buy!

    1. Re:Microsoft's Right! by piovere · · Score: 1

      open with: I am using iTunes and really liking it. that being said, it seems like someone has finally caught on. Napster 2.0 looks to be using a business model almost identical to the iTMS. It's not a subscription service, the files can be used on up to 3 computers--the only difference is that a given playlist can only be burnt once, vice ten times. Generally it seems good--will they make money on it? The difference between Napster and Apple is that Apple is using their store to sell a player. And while Napster has a number of players which are evidently being specifically designed for it, does the money from them go to the Napster company?

  98. Choice?!?!? by apoch2001 · · Score: 1

    How can Microsoft demand choice!??! They're the leaders of restriction and of closed source software! I'm awaiting for the Microsoft Version of iTunes... wTunes perhaps? Then we'll see how much choice Microsoft will allow! Keep this article handy for that day!

  99. guess i missed this speck of FUD in the orig by jpellino · · Score: 1

    "...Napster, it will launch as the world's largest online service with over half a million tracks from all the major labels and hundreds of independents on October 29. Napster goes way beyond individual downloads, offering advanced services such as unlimited downloads, customized radio, shared playlists, music videos and more. "

    Uh, Apple has 400K songs by that date,

    iTunes has customized radio,
    iTunes has shared playlists (sharers see them, right?)
    ITMS has music videos.
    Apple has "more". Hell, son - everyone has "more".

    What good is "unlimted downloads" - you download it once, you own it, you do what you want. Why would I want unlimted downloads - it certainly doesn't mean that ITMS has a "full" meter... what the hell does this mean?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  100. Orlowski thinks Apple is a monopoly by panurge · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Obviously failed economics 101. A monopoly is something which effectively controls the supply of an economic good. Microsoft is a monopoly as regards desktop operating systems, though not as regards servers. Apple does not control the supply of anything. Orlowski does not appear to realise that vertically integrated business != monopoly.

    It's as stupid as calling BMW a monopoly because only BMW makes BMWs.

    Or perhaps Orlowski is thinking that Apple is in a monopoly position as regards the suppliers of software. Actually, because their market share is small, the opposite is the case. They have to provide reasons for suppliers to support them. The fact that some applications may be subsumed by Apple is a fact of life: every manufacturer has to make make or buy decisions all the time. Currently conventional wisdom is that everything is better subcontracted out, but eventually if you go far enough the subcontractors own you.

    Personally, I suspect that the ITMS may be too small to survive: if revenue is around $30 million and none of that is profit, there is no real budget to promote it. But at least it's a try, and Apple should be given full credit for trying.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Orlowski thinks Apple is a monopoly by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally, I suspect that the ITMS may be too small to survive: if revenue is around $30 million and none of that is profit, there is no real budget to promote it.

      Apple has a few billion in the bank, so there's your promotion budget.

      Also, no matter how well the iTMS does, Apple still only makes a pittance from it, thanks to the record labels and their huge cut. The whole service is basically a loss leader designed to sell iPods (which are quite profitable), and ideally even induce some people to switch to the Mac. The iTMS is the razor, and iPods are the blades.

      ~Philly

    2. Re:Orlowski thinks Apple is a monopoly by alecto · · Score: 1, Insightful
      It's as stupid as calling BMW a monopoly because only BMW makes BMWs.

      Really? I didn't know BMWs took a different type of fuel than do Mercedes or Aston Martin motorcars.

      (Since BMWs can the same fuel, the car analogy is invalid--that, and it leaves open this: BMWs do cost twice as much as other cars, but unlike Macs, the go faster :).)

      Only Macs can run Mac software. To purchase a Mac, you have to purchase OS X. Smells like a monopoly to me, albeit a tiny one.

    3. Re:Orlowski thinks Apple is a monopoly by Zimm · · Score: 1

      Obviously failed economics 101.

      Well you Obviously failed as well. Microsoft is a legal monopoly, not an economic one. A subtle distinction perhaps, but an important one none the less.

      Economic Monopoly Definition: A firm that produces the entire market supply of a particular good or service.

    4. Re:Orlowski thinks Apple is a monopoly by zentigger · · Score: 1
      Personally, I suspect that the ITMS may be too small to survive: if revenue is around $30 million and none of that is profit, there is no real budget to promote it. But at least it's a try, and Apple should be given full credit for trying.

      who needs a promption budget when posting to slashdot is free?

      --

      the above is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect that of the little voices in my head

    5. Re:Orlowski thinks Apple is a monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "BMWs do cost twice as much as other cars, but unlike Macs, the [sic] go faster" -- This statement is a good example of a logical fallacy, namely begging the question. You assume that PCs are faster than Macs; there is no proof of this. That is your opinion but again the speed comparison is one of the unresolved arguments. There are cases where PCs are faster than Macs and cases where Macs are faster than PCs. If you compare the price of a Mac to a similarly equipped Sony or even a Dell (again, you can't go off of apparent processor speed either), the price difference is very small.

    6. Re:Orlowski thinks Apple is a monopoly by alecto · · Score: 1

      That still doesn't address that an analogy to cars is inappropriate to begin with. I merely pointed out that using that analogy (besides being wrong) provides an easy setup for a speed comparison. Despite Apple's "Megahertz Myth" propaganda, it is a matter of fact, not opinion, that comparably priced PCs have run rings around their Mac counterparts. Whether this remains the case with the new generation of each (Athlon 64/Itanium and G5) remains yet to be seen.

    7. Re:Orlowski thinks Apple is a monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft isn't a legal monopoly. Yes, it's legal, and yes, it's a monopoly, but that's not what a "legal monopoly" is. A legal monopoly occurs when a municipality or the government officially grants a monopoly to a given company, such as a monopoly on providing phone or electrical service in a given area. This is usually done in cases where competition would be wasteful and inefficient (i.e. dozens of different power companies planting their own poles).

    8. Re:Orlowski thinks Apple is a monopoly by Zimm · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant Microsoft fits the legal definition of a monopoly and not the economic one.

    9. Re:Orlowski thinks Apple is a monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only did he fail Economic 101, he obviously never played Monopoly. Any kids who play Monopoly will tell you the definition closer to the actual definition of monopoly than this guy can. Plus, this comes from a company who is a convicted monopolist (DoJ vs MS trial).

  101. Re:in related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can name one lie off the top of my head. how bout when baby george landed on the carrier in his halloween costume and said that the carrier was too far away to fly by helicopter. and oh yeah, the carrier had to be repositioned so that when they filmed gw landing, you couldn't see the san diago skyline.

  102. iTunes, WMP and OS integration by theolein · · Score: 1

    I assume there will be people out there in any case who will claim that Apple integrates iTunes in Mac OSX just as Microsoft integrates WMP in WinXP and should there fore be under the same penalties as Microsoft.

    To this I say, on your Mac OSX system you just navigate to your Applications folder, drag the iTunes application to the trash and emmpty the trash. Boom, it's gone. No, mindbogglingly complex setup panel just to hide WMP, and even if you delete the .exe it will get restored automatically. Nothing like that at all.

  103. Use Proxomitron to spoof browser ID by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    Go to www.proxomitron.info, grab The Proxomitron, install, add JD5000's filter set (www.jd5000.net), and browse any site regardless of their IE only status. As a bonus, say goodbye to ads, popups, and a host of other internet annoyances forever (including Slashdot ads etc).

    All free, and it works with any browser (in Windows, anyway).

    Don't know of an equivalent in Linux but it would be great to be able to use the same filters if someone were to create a Linux version of Proxomitron...

    In short, best internet helper program EVER.

    Quizo69

    1. Re:Use Proxomitron to spoof browser ID by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Even easier ... open a window, type "about:config" for a URL, filter on useragent, set general.useragent.override to whatever browser string you want. For IE use:

      Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98)

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    2. Re:Use Proxomitron to spoof browser ID by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      ...and perpetuate the idea that everybody uses IE and other browsers aren't worth targeting.

      Better idea: don't patronize that web site.

    3. Re:Use Proxomitron to spoof browser ID by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... that's the flip side of it. Maybe it's time we toss the stats cullers a bone. How about something like:

      Mozilla/5.0 (Mozilla 1.5, MSIE 4.0 compatible; Linux 2.4.21)

      Sends a clear message that we aren't using IE *by choice*. It does beg the question of what the hell MSIE "compatible" is though.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    4. Re:Use Proxomitron to spoof browser ID by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Proxomitron is a great proxy, and I use for regular surfing. Privoxy is a Linux proxy server with very much alike features. Privoxy is probably slightly more powerful, the best feature is probably the ablity to go to the url p.p or config.privoxy.org and change the settings (if that's enabled in the config file). Unforunately, I don't think there's any simple way to transfer filter settings between them, partially since they have slightly different regular expressions.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    5. Re:Use Proxomitron to spoof browser ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... and find the site doesn't work because Mozilla/Firebird doesn't handle MSIE-custom javascript.

  104. How do I put these damn WMA files on my iPod??? by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1

    So I have this great portable device -- it easily bests the competition -- but my problem is that I can't get the music I buy from the 'other' services to work on it. I really think it is a big oversight that these 'WMA' files don't work with my player of choice. Sure I can make a playlist using yet another piece of software that I don't own (and don't want to pay for) and then burn that to a cd or convert it to an old boring MP3(as if), but I really think that is too much trouble to have to go to. I mean who would make music files available for sale, willfully omiting support for me. I just don't see how these 'services' are going to be successful. I guess it's back to LP's and 8-tracks for me. I mean sure the quality and lack of DRM are upsetting and all, but this newfangled practice of converting my music into different formats for my usage is too much -- it'd be like plugging a turntable into a cassette deck and hitting record so that you could have a copy for a smaller device so that you didn't have to lug around a turntable...oh...well, still, I just want to know why I can't play that cassette on the turntable? I mean, it's my cassette. It's my turntable. It seems like a conspiracy to keep me from using my music on my terms. I'm going back to my cave...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
    1. Re:How do I put these damn WMA files on my iPod??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duhhhhhh...

      You really honestly think one company is going to support the licenses of another company?? Puhlease.

      And besides, have you done any "ear-testing" lately on a good stereo? WMV sucks ass through the ears and out again. So much lost on the top and bottom ends it's not even funny. AAC and MP3 beat it, though both of them are still not the real deal, but at least I can get closer.

    2. Re:How do I put these damn WMA files on my iPod??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just convert WMA files to MP3. The iPod loads MP3 just fine.

      Quite simple!!!

    3. Re:How do I put these damn WMA files on my iPod??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serves you right for buying Apple shit, you fucking fanboy zealot. Personally, I prefer to buy better things and get actual value for my money. AND be able to play MP3's, WMA's, or OOG files. Stupid fucking fanboy, zama wo miro!

  105. And don't forget the premier gaming platform... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...DOS which you can pick up on ebay.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  106. Not quite true... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    Apparently you can play AAC/mp4 files in other players, namely Quicktime player. If you change the extension of the Itunes file from .m4a to .mp4 it will play fine in Quicktime player. Although I have not tried it, I would be surprised if you could not then transcode the .mp4 file to mp3 or WMA with DBpoweramp or similar and upload to minidisc, mp3 player, etc.

    Can anyone concur?

    Thanks to another Slashdot poster for this discovery.

  107. Add your band to the iTunes Music Store by reptilicus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple has just put out a help document for musicians looking to sell songs through the iTMS: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=931 91

  108. I sucked cock while watching slashdot get /. by jbottero · · Score: 1

    Does that make me Timothy's boy toy?

  109. The TRUTH about iTunes... by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    1. iTunes DOES NOT RESTRICT YOU FROM PLAYING YOUR MUSIC ON OTHER MP3 Players. iTunes allows you rip a CD in MP3, AAC (MP4), WAV, and AIFF. The iPod can play ALL OF THESE FORMATS. Most other MP3 players can play MP3 and WAV files (I don't know about AIFF). When YOU make your own digital music files from YOUR CDs, THEY DO NOT CONTAIN DRM. The only songs that contain DRM are the ones YOU PURCHASE from the iTunes Music Store. On my Blue & White Apple Power Macintosh G3, I've been ripping my CDs at 320Kbits/sec, making play lists, and burning to CD ever since iTunes came out. I've never had any difficulty playing those CDs in my car. And more importantly, I've never made any coasters with iTunes.

    2. Once you burn your AAC files to CD in AUDIO CD format, they lose all DRM. You can then rip them back into iTunes as MP3 AT THE SAME RATE (128Kbits/sec AAC) that they were when you purchased them from iTMS. The newly acquired MP3s are DRM-FREE and will play in any MP3 player. Obviously, there are NO LIMITATIONS when using iTunes and purchasing content from the iTMS.

    3. Microsoft is threatened and therefore scared. They are not going to be able to cash-in on this new market anytime soon. M$ is blowing a lot of hot air to try to suppress the sale of iPods and thereby hinder Apple's profits. It wasn't long ago that a professional audiophile magazine (story listed here on Slashdot, sorry no link) said that the iPod had the best electronics for reproducing digital sound OF ALL the MP3 players on the market. Yup, uh-huh, The Borg are threatened because a truly innovative company offers a decent product at a pretty good price point, not to mention excellent FREE software that could potentially open up the users minds to the possibility of what it would be like if their entire computer ran as smoothly as iTunes software. Just imagine, no more BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH.

    4. Apple is kicking M$ in the teeth with steel-toed boots.

    5. If any of us geeks have financial-oriented brains, start buying Apple stock now, because this iTunes Music Store with Audible Books is really going to take off.

  110. what about canada eh? by beyonddeath · · Score: 0

    I might be an eskimo, but i still want to buy my music legally. sure we pay the blank cd tax, but im sure we could stillb e thrown in jail regardless. that site that started up has none of the music i listen too, or their search engine sucks ass. Try looking for autopilot off or yellowcard. I looked at all the major cd stores in down town toronto, and none of them stock their cds, im impatient and dont feel like waiting 4-6 weeks for them to order them in so i resorted to downloading them. when they finally get their act together and offer the music i want when i want it, then i will pay for it.

  111. Irony? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    Nice spin on the submission, though. +1 MS Hater. The article is really about 2 competing monopolies and how they differently implement their monopolistic ways. The real point of the article comes about 1/3 the way down: "Under which monopoly are users happier?"

    Humor in the article aside, it's really a reasonably balanced look at the issue.

  112. Re:Beatles sue Apple over iTunes by Biff98 · · Score: 1

    Damn -- I thought Slashdot got a bad rap for posting old news -- this news is approximately 1.5 months OLD. Thanks again for the late-breaking information!

    Go configure an Exchange Server you dolt.

  113. Re:in related news... by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
    Thank you! It's nice to see I'm not the only person here with an independent brain that thinks independent of the Democratic mouthpieces.

    Even if you take a karma hit, you spoke the truth man!

  114. Sorta right and sorta wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Apple is using something other than industry standard MP3. They are using industry standard MP4 (that is the "standard" name for AAC).

    Apple's DRM files that you get from the ITMS is playable in your car. Just burn a CD from iTunes. I can't speak for your portable player since I don't know which one you have.

  115. Re:Bush has never lied moron by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
    as there were no terrorist acts committed on US soil during his term?

    Heheh, are you stupid or just so young you honestly don't remember? :) As mentioned above, Oklahoma City and the first WTC bombing. And if you want to include attacks on U.S. outside of our soil, consider the two embassy bombings in Africa and the attack on the Cole, and the Khobar Towers attack.

    The U.S. actually suffered more terrorist attacks under Clinton than Bush. And it's obvious that 9/11 was planned primarily during the Clinton presidency and apparently wasn't detected or stopped under his administration--so blaming Bush because they didn't stop in 8 months when Clinton's administration didn't even detect in 8 years is just silly.

    Anyway, welcome to the real world. Get your facts right next time.

  116. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    please note..that is wrote "merits of their products *alone*".. I did *not* write that that companies were putting out crappy products and people had no choice but to use them, though they sometimes do.

  117. words words words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too many words. Two bottles of Bawls and long(or any length really) articles don't mix.

  118. Is that you, again, Anonymous?... by Mother+Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought I told you, no more leaving the asylum. I don't like coming here to visit, only to find your room empty and to hear that you've not been taking your meds and are running around the grounds, naked, spouting off with your 'crazy talk' about GWB being a responsible president. I thought your therapist and I made this clear -- The president and Aschroft are bad men. It's only when your medication wears off that you start getting 'mud brain' and forget the truth. Now be a good boy and get your mother a glass of water...I love you too...Don't worry, we'll get you out of here once you're all better...

    --
    Mother Coward. Making the world a safer place for Mac Zealots since 2003...
  119. Re:Beatles sue Apple over iTunes by Walrus99 · · Score: 0

    So does anyone know the current status of the lawsuit. Apparently it hasn't stopped Apple (computers) from continuing to expand iTunes.

    Reminds me of an old joke: Why is Yoko Ono like a lizard?

    Because they both live off a dead beetle.

  120. Re:in related news... by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    Here's a good site and here's a lousy site about Bush lies. I am sure there are more.

    that you choose to ignore the fact that we are WW3, against the exact same sort of fascist minds that we were in 60 years ago is not Pres. Bush's fault.

    Do you mean fascist minds like that of Franco in Spain who kept ruling well past WW2? US still hasn't recognized the volunteers who valiantly tried to stop his takeover of power in the Spanish Civil War by granting them veterans' rights.

    that ... the frogs and krauts ... agreed that saddam ... had WMD's...

    Well, it looks as though the "frogs" and the "krauts" were wrong about that.;)

    it is the same religious fanaticism that drives the islamicists to blow up buildings with airplanes.

    Yes, all people who have opinions different from yours are driven by them to blow up buildings with airplanes.;)

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  121. 50 megs of NO. by vena · · Score: 1

    the damn thing eats memory like nobody's buisiness. other than occassionally buying music through the service, i'll be damned if i use it as my every-day player when winamp takes roughly 15 megs with the same number of songs in the playlist.

    1. Re:50 megs of NO. by Yosho · · Score: 1

      If it takes up that much memory, you're probably doing something wrong. If you're not using them, try disabling the equalizer, and go into the preferences and disable the sound enhancer. iTunes takes up about 15 megs for me when it's in focus, about 9 megs when it's minimized. That's with around 2,000 songs in the playlist.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  122. Re:in related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that you choose to ignore the fact that we are WW3

    I'm sorry, but how can we be in "WW3", when nobody has declared war?

    against the exact same sort of fascist minds that we were in 60 years ago is not Pres. Bush's fault.

    The fact that the US is at "war" (again, never declared) is indeed Bush's fault. He had the power to make the world a better place, instead he decides to invade foreign countries.

    Bush relied on the best intel available

    Ah, no - Bush created the intel - he wanted to invade Iraq, so he tells the CIA to produce "evidence" to support his decision.

    Here is pretty much direct evidence that he lied - the aluminium tubes purchased, could "could only be used to enrich Uranium". A boldfaced lie, as anyone who knew anything about them knows that they have a myriad of non "WMD" uses.

    everybody, even the frogs and krauts, agreed that saddam was in material breach, had WMD's, and was a major threat

    Bullshit - the first part is correct, but everything else is just hogwash.. the only people who believed that he had "WMDs" were the liars who were looking for an excuse to invade. As far as a "major threat" - to WHAT!?!?!?!? The US's oil supply? That's hardly a case for war.

    you cannot name one lie the president told

    Wrong. I have proved otherwise. (Aluminium tubes.) There have been others as well ("Texas has never sentenced an innocent person to death" - well, that could just be stupidity) but this one is more on-topic.

    are there intelligence failures? absolutely.

    And unfortunately, the biggest failure is that the current administration is dictating what the intelligence should find, based on the course of action they want to take, instead of the other way around.

    it is the same religious fanaticism that drives the islamicists to blow up buildings with airplanes.

    And the same religious fanaticism that drives Bush to invade other countries.

  123. I loaded up iTunes and liked it by schroedlzone · · Score: 1

    I've never owned a Mac and prob never will. I've always been a Windows user. My roommate and I tried buymusic.com last week I found it was the biggest headache of our lives. I abhor WMP9. We couldn't use our beloved winamp. iTunes is clean, easy and didn't force me to switch browsers or download a new codecs (what the *?!) just to play a song. And for a bonus I found a plug-in for Winamp2 that lets me play AAC/MP4 files on it. I'll never buy a iPod or portable MP3 player so that's no big deal, I'll mainly burn CDs to use in the car or at work.

    I'm fairly happy with iTunes... Although the selection will need to expand, several of my favorite musicians are only represented by one or fewer albums...

  124. Re:in related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  125. Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/Oh the irony/Oh the hypocrisy/

  126. "Re:irony no." No Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AAC is an adopted MPEG (the Motion Picture and Entertainment Group) standard. It is supported by other players such as those by Panasonic. Still other portable digital audio players support the standard through conversion.

    Your definition of a monopoly is rather skewed. Apple has only a 4% share of the PC market. They cannot influence significant change through the industry without quality products. Their track record is well documented for using quality parts and innovation.

    MS software is embedded on ~95% of al PC's manufactured. They influence not only how other software companies but also how Hardware manufacturers have been able to work. Their track record is also well documented, here and in other less biased sources.

    MS does manufacturer hardware. This is primarily in markets considered either accessories, i.e MS Mice, Keyboards, Joysticks etc. or as gamesystems, i.e. X-Box. In addition since they have such a blatant monopoly in Software they can dictate how the hardware industry turns simply by giving their approval or leaving out support for a particular hardware. In XP if the hardware is not MS certified the installation will "warn" you in what could be construed as a FUD tactic to force vendors to pay-up for XP certification.

    If the tables were turned and Apple had even 85% of the market I would certainly agree with you that Apple would pose a greater threat as a monopoly. As it is there are significant barriers to adopting Apple or any other platform other than MS in the PC market.

    You are correct in your assessment that if MS had MSTunes service that there would be a cry from Slashdotters. This is not as hypocritical as you think though. First iTunes is available on Mac and Windows, and Slashdotters did complain when it was only Mac only. Second MS has a track record of bundling their version of software/ standards/content to the detriment of all other alternatives. Remember they bundled IE into the OS and forced HW vendors to include it in their machines. This is not the first instance of this behavior nor the last.

    Although there are a number of anarchists who beleive everything should be free, I do not beleive the whole of Slashdot holds the opinion that commercial proprietary software/formats is necessarily bad so long as there are reasonable alternatives. MS, either planned or just by their sheer size/weight, have squelched most competition in most arenas such that they are in a potential position to control not only the desktop you use, the appplications that you use but also the content that you view. They control the vertical, the horizontal, and the means in which you change the channel.

    The danger of a monopoly in the media is when they are able to Embraces, Extend, Extinguish Free as in Speech. It hasn't happened yet, and I doubt it will, but they are changing our way we receive information.

  127. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by tbone1 · · Score: 1
    Could you please stop hitting him on the head with your bat? Maybe that's one of the reason's he's braindead.

    The man attended an Ivy League school. Based on working with Ivy Leaguers, I'd say that his braindeadedness was in the kitty a loooong time ago.

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  128. Re:Why do the English have disgusting teeth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Fuck you. Over the last year or so I've read insult after insult about me and my country. Now, someone post one little comment and you're all crying like babies. I've really learned to hate all you motherfuckers.

    One comment is going to destroy your karma? If this is the case, then you must be a special kind of idiot, because any idiot can keep good karma around here.

  129. Re:Bush has never lied moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that the terroristic attacks at Ruby Ridge and Waco happened during Clinton's terms in office. Oh, wait, that WAS the feds...nevermind

  130. Two Words For You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck You

    You Microsoft fucking shill

    Shut the fuck up--nobody cares about anything you have to say

  131. The difference by autechre · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple uses open standards which can be implemented by all, including Free software projects. Their entire desktop, aside from having BSD Unix underneath, is heavily reliant on PDF. They make it easy to interoperate with others.

    Microsoft makes up their own "standards", and the market uses them because Microsoft has a monopoly. When they do release specs, the specs are wrong (ask the Samba team). When they do implement real standards, they change them in incompatible ways and make life hard for those who need interoperability with pretty much every other system.

    You might argue that Apple only does this because they have to, having such a small market share. That may be true, but we don't have access to an alternate reality to find out, so we have to look at the current real-life situation.

    Additionally, the Apple integration of hardware and software is the reason their computers work so well. You don't have to like it, but it seems to be catching on. And Microsoft does sell keyboards, mice, and Xboxes.

    FWIW, I run Linux and can't use iTMS, but that is OK. Most CDs I buy are for $5-$10 at a show immediatly after seeing the band play for the first time (and the shows often cost less than $10 too). None of the bands I see would be arrogant enough to cripple their CDs, because they actually want people to hear their music. And if my friend, who uses iTMS, wants to put some songs from it on a CD for me, he can hand me a standard CD with no problems.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    1. Re:The difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course AAC is ALSO "industry standard" as it is part of MPEG just as Layer 3 (MP3) is part of MPEG as is Layer 2 and Layer 1.

      Now, certainly MPEG Layer 3 (MP3) is in widest use today but with QT6 you are able to encode MPEG AAC. You can get an AAC plugin for Winamp that will let you play AAC files without DRM. (As in, any AAC file you rip from your own CDs.)

      Obviously AAC files with DRM (purchased from iTMS) will only play in iTunes or on an iPod.

  132. Re:iTunes can't play WMA ~ conversely by Digital11 · · Score: 1

    Hmm, methinks it'd be rather hard for ALL of those manufacturer's of WMA compatible MP3 players to reverse engineer the format. Of course MS provides the specs of the format. And yes, you can license the DRM tech as well. How do you think PressPlay/Napster operates?

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  133. Re:in related news... by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    It's really hard to tell if this is a troll or not. The opinion's within the realm of possibility, but the "OMG my precious karma pity me plz!" thing and the accusing random people of being terrorists seems to indicate troll. Fantastic if it's a troll, kinda humorless if it's real.

    Anyway, just to keep up appearences:

    "I would remind you that when the inspectors first went into Iraq and were denied -- finally denied access, a report came out of the Atomic -- the IAEA that they were six months away from developing a weapon. I don't know what more evidence we need." -Bush

    "There's never been a report like that issued from this agency." -IAEA spokesman

  134. Two previous Apple Corps lawsuits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...two dead Beatles. Coincidence? I think not!

    Place your bets, folks! Paul or Ringo, this time?

  135. Re:in related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But... but... but... I AM a real he-man military aviatorer! I was in the National Guard fer gorshsakes! Daddy, tell them!"

  136. Off-topic... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

    I just had to comment on your signature -- Donnie Darko is a great film. :D

  137. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by jaysones · · Score: 1
    I should switch to WindowsXP so that I won't be restricted to viewing music, movies, etc.

    "Viewing music" is no easier on any other platform. :P

  138. Working with the record companies... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    Would the record companies like to work with Microsoft on this?

    If the record companies sign a deal with Microsoft, all sorts of things will start to happen once Microsoft gain monopoly status. They would be able to call the shots over the RIAA and smaller record companies.

    They probably figure that Apple are big enough and smart enough, but can't overpower them.

  139. WMA-MP3.com Now SHUT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen I hate to hear all these people whine "I can't put my WMA files on my iPod" well there are work arounds to just about everything.

    ACC burn Audio rip MP3 and make a backup of the music in the same stroke. Someone will make a ACC to "any format" converter and make a few bucks in the process.

    It's easier if you have a iPod to use iTunes and the ACC w/Fairplay.

    ACC is so Apple doesn't have to pay Microsoft and be subjective to their control. That's our Apple.

    Another thing is this Napster is not going to be around long, selling music online doesn't make much. And once everyone has a portable MP3 player Napster will die.

    Apple will still be around.

  140. No, I'm New Here by New+Here · · Score: 0

    No, I'm New Here

  141. Just an idea by nutshell42 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Dear Mr. Jobs,
    we the geeks are in full support of Microsoft's demand to open up media players for all competitors and hope you will give in.

    A possible loss of revenue could be compensated by a new program with the tentative title "Apple Office for Windows" and we're all looking forward to Microsoft's complaint that office suites should be open and support all competing document formats.

    etc...

    --
    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  142. Your band on iTunes, Apple is a label now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes right here http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=931 91

    Apple has become a Label, oh boy will Apple Corps be pissed!

    I say f^ck em! Go Steve!!!

  143. Re:in related news... by modecx · · Score: 1

    Speaking of fascist minds, huh?

    Bush is the single most fascist person in charge of a government in the world at this moment, you should know. He was second in running before Sadam was ousted. Not to point out a pebble in one's eye, when you have a log in your own:

    Fascism:
    1. often Fascism
    1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
    2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
    2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.

    Fascist: an adherent of fascism or other right-wing authoritarian views

    This is the president who is a member of a group of secular fundamentalist hypocrite idiots who wish for nothing more than to take our freedoms, and to suppresses those who do not share their views. Exhibit A: Anti-Terrorism Acts that are overly broad and apply to non-terrorists.

    Bush, and his cabinet ignored CIA intelligence that indicated Iraq was not in possession of nuclear or other material, was not seeking any, and was not in the process of disseminating what they didn't have to terrorists. Exhibit B: Here, Here, Here, and everywhere else, damnit. If only you would pull your head out of your ass, you could see it; however, I wouldn't expect that from a Bush apologist.

    Nobody agreed that he was in material breech. NOBODY. We still haven't found one indicator of anything related to WMDs of any kind, and I sincerely doubt we ever will. The funny thing is the even the Great United States violates tons and tons of UN resolutions, and is in the top ten violators--right behind Morocco (#3), Turkey (#2), and Israel (#1)--yet we haven't attacked any of these other countries, or stopped violating UN resolutions, ourselves.

    I'm not Saddams biggest fan (no fan of him at all, in fact), but you'll have to admit this all looks like the US is a real asshole of a big-brother giving the rest of the world noogies, dutch rubs, titty-twisters, purple-nurples, etc. and only getting rewarded for their actions--if you stick your head up and pay attention to what's going on. I'm glad that Saddam is gone, and that his sons are dead. They were a menace to the people of Iraq, however, all indicators say they were not a direct threat to the people of the United States.

    Now, the republicans want to pass laws that make the 10 commandments, and pledge saying mandatory in schools. They hold that the US was created with christian morals, and religion in mind, when in fact, it was not, and when anyone tries to show them the truth, they do the equivalent of putting their fingers in their ears and yell "I CAN'T HEAR YOU LALALALALA!!!" If this sort of behavior is not belligerent nationalism, I don't know what is. And, as Bushie says, if you're not against it, you're for it. If he allows these sorts of laws pass, chalk another one up. He's almost completed every criteria to be a fascist by definition. All he needs to do is convince Congress to eliminate the term limits, and give him all the power, and he will qualify across the board.

    Furthermore, I state that you, yourself are a fascist, and therefore your ideas are full of shit. "frogs and krauts", indeed. belligerent nationalism and racism. Check.

    It's no wonder the rest of the world won't take Americans seriously, with people like you running about--flapping their gums.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  144. wrong.... by unity · · Score: 1

    " if MS removes IE from Windows, it would break Apples software"

    and what "powerful browser of their own" runs on windows? Safari is great, but i don't believe it runs on windows.

    i hate people that get all snotty and are wrong at the same time.

    1. Re:wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Safari is not that strontly tied to Apples own os. The browser engine is KHTML with some kde specific parts removed the only real hooks probably are into qt, which also runs on windows, it should be a matter of hours or days to port it to windows.

  145. No obscurity is involved by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Because Apple tells you how to burn and how to rip. Your are just forced to be explicitely aware of what you are doing rather than mindlessly sharing ~/Music on Limewire as you could if iTMS gave you regular MP3s.

    Also, you may not be bothered by the loss of quality in double encoding, but you will know it's there. If you like the song, you will want to get the real thing rather than a "secondhand" copy from your friend.

  146. MS's strategy by angle_slam · · Score: 1
    Their strategy shouldn't be saying -- Apple sucks. It should say. "Hey, iTunes/iTMS is pretty damn cool. But you need Windows XP to use it (Apple's decision, not ours), so upgrade your 95, 98, and ME systems."

    What MS needs (because Longhorn is so far away), is the "killer app" that forces people to leave their Windows 9x systems for XP. iTunes/iTMS could be it.

  147. MS hardware by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
    Gawd! A lot of MS articles today.

    Anyhoo. From the article:

    " Can Microsoft learn to be a hardware designer? Does such a thing even exist in the sacred screeds of horizontal business model textbooks?"
    There are a few places in that article where the author says that M$ doesn't make hardware. What's this X Box thing then? And what about this SPOT technology that they're promising is going to be the biggest thing since WAP?

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  148. Re:I disabled adds on slashdot.. by professor+seagull · · Score: 1

    what, do you want a cookie? go back to sleep

  149. OS / Application divide! by gamartin · · Score: 1

    My first reaction to the Microsoft quote: Why is Microsoft bashing an application written for Windows? iTunes is a novel application, Microsoft should applaud the port to Windows.

    This is a perfect example (previously Netscape) of what's wrong with Microsoft's OS-encompasses-all-applications crap-ovation.

    Obvious question: Why would any business ever write a commercial application for Windows, knowing that if it's successful Microsoft will muscle in and take the business? Microsoft has a proven track record of this, and fervently demands the right to leverage Windows into any market it desires (innovation). Microsoft's biggest PR efforts try to cloak how utterly hostile this company is to the competitive business environment.

    This hostility more than anything else lights the path to Microsoft's inevitable decline.

    Also, the failure of the Dept of Justice to prosecute Microsoft in this regard is still galling; history will not be kind.

  150. Just for the record, on "Monopolies"... by Cheesewhiz · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    "There's plenty of irony in seeing one monopoly accuse another monopoly of restricting users' choices. But monopolies they both are."

    This is a hideously bad understanding of what a monopoly is. A lot of people around /. are saying that any company that's A) Big, and B) Retains exclusive rights to its products, is a monopoly, and that's dead wrong.

    Here's a nice short definition, courtesy of Dictionary.com:

    Monopoly \Mo*nop"o*ly\, n.; pl. Monopolies. 1. The exclusive power, or privilege of selling a commodity; the exclusive power, right, or privilege of dealing in some article, or of trading in some market; sole command of the traffic in anything, however obtained;"

    Note that it says "commodity", not "product." The iPod is a product, MP3 players are a commodity, for example. For Microsoft, Windows is a product but operating systems are the commodity, etc.

    And even if Apple controlled 95% of the MP3 player market instead of ~35% they have now, they would STILL have to resort to anti-competitive practices to be legally considered a monopoly.

    Microsoft all but has a monopoly on the operating system market (Windows), the office software market (Office), the web browser market (Internet Explorer), and lord knows what else...

    But again, just because you control a large portion of the market does NOT mean you're automatically a monopoly. And retaining the exclusivity of your products (i.e., the iPod, iTunes, or the G5) also does not mean you're a monopoly, unless it's anti-competitive to do so, and you exert undue control over that market.

    Just for the record...

    --

    -----
    "Cogito Eggo Sum: I think, therefore, waffle."
    1. Re:Just for the record, on "Monopolies"... by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      Please stop trying to cloud the issue with facts and fancy terms like 'definition.' Your foolish pursuit of 'truth' and 'common sense' does nothing to further the point. This is all about finding fault where none exists -- facts be damned!

  151. Apple has no problems with ads or margins by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The margin on ITMS is supposed to be pretty good for Apple (forget the numbers). But beyond that, have you not read about the ads they are doing/going to do? They already have some very goods commercials playing on TV now, and the major one is a Pepsi tie-in coming up in January - during the superbowl they are going to announce Pepsi is giving away 100 million songs. That's a lot of new iTunes users (fpor you download iTunes to collect) and a huge brand-raising event.

    Not to mention that every single AOL customer is now a click away from being on iTunes without ever entering a credit card number.

    And if ITMS is a too small to survive - then how will the other services, when Apple (pre-WinITMS) already had 70% of the legal online music marketshare?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  152. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft truly understood open standards, there wouln't have ever been a '.doc' format, or at the very least, they would have published the format so that their customers could exchange documents easily between people that may not use the same software.

    --
    No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
  153. DRM WMA is less prevalent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Devices that play WMA9 with DRM support are more rare than WMA capable devices in general.

    But they are still likely more prevalent (measured by number of models) than AAC or AAC DRM (fairplay) devices.

    Although there are a lot of iPods out there.

  154. Re:in related news... by schon · · Score: 1

    you cannot name one lie the president told

    Wrong. I can, and I will.

  155. How long until O'Reilly publishes "ITunes Hacks"? by ctrimble · · Score: 1

    I imagine it's only a matter of time.

  156. Limited burns...only if you lack imagination. by zerocircle · · Score: 1
    no more than 10 burns of a playlist containing an iTMS track (fine, make a different playlist)

    Make a different playlist...or burn it once and then duplicate that CD as many times as you want. All it takes is a second drive -- doesn't even have to be a writer -- or, hell, you don't even need a second drive: Burn your playlist, read the CD back in as an image, and burn the image 'til the cows come home.

  157. Woah by coolmacdude · · Score: 1

    Dup stories are certainly not uncommon on /., but I'm thinking Taco had way too much to drink or something. When was the last time both stories were posted by the same person?

    --

    -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
  158. Closed system? by Stevyn · · Score: 1
    Unless Apple decides to make radical changes to their service model, a Windows-based version of iTunes will still remain a closed system

    And unless Microsoft decides to make radical changes to Office, it will remain a closed system. The same goes for every other product they sell.

  159. Sierra Square Delta Square by i_r_sensitive · · Score: 1

    Same shit, different day. Sad to say, but I'm almost weepy I'm having such a deja vu moment... ...Or for the halcyon days when Apple and M$ were at each other's throats, and Linux slipped quietly through the fracas... But, the best part of the whole article was at the bottom... M$ Word for OS X apparently doesn't have the word competetive in the default dictionary! I wonder if "unfair trade practices" and Microsoft in the same sentence set off the grammar checker?!

    --
    "Talk minus action equals nothing" - Joey Shithead, D.O.A.
    "Talk minus action equals /." -
  160. closed system by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's comments are especially ironic considering this.

  161. OK, pay attention. Don't rip-INTERCEPT! by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1
    You don't need to burn a CD full of AAC encoded music from iTMS, and then rip it to MP3 if you use either of the following:

    Total Recorder for Windows and Wire Tapfor OS X.

    Both intercept and record an audio stream from inside the computer (to put it simply enough for all to 'get' the idea) and save it to the HD or RAM disk AS AN MP3 file.

    Import that MP3 file into your "music" folder/library/portible digital player of choice and away you go, unencumbered by DRM.

    I beleive that either of these applications mayl also work with WMA files, regadless of how DMR bound they may be.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    1. Re:OK, pay attention. Don't rip-INTERCEPT! by macmaxbh · · Score: 1

      WireTap only saves as an AIFF file, so you'd still need to convert it.

  162. +5, funny by digital+bath · · Score: 1

    hahaha.. thanks. if I had mod points, you'd get 'em. Funniest thing I've read all day.

    --
    find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
  163. he may have a point (bear with me) by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK what I'm about to say sounds very strange coming out of my mouth... but here goes.

    I think Fester has a point.

    Using Windows Media Player, I can play DRM tunes from BuyMusic.com, Napster, and other stores which use WMA DRM (of which he purported there are several others). I can send those same DRM tunes to various supporting hardware.

    Using iTunes, I can play DRM tunes from ... iTunes. I can send those same DRM tunes to ... iPod.

    All that said ....

    I have a .WMA song I bought from BuyMusic.com, and a .M4P song I bought from iTunes. I can't play them both in a single player. To me, that's both Microsoft's and Apple's problem to solve. Apple can probably "solve" it by allowing third party hackers to write a Quicktime plugin for WMA. I wonder how Microsoft plans to solve the fact that their Media Player can't play the most popular DRM format (in terms of number of downloads) for music?

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  164. Check your calendar.. by jmscott42 · · Score: 1

    It's an odd-numbered Tuesday of an even numbered month.

    We like Apple, Sony, and daisies today. Next Friday is when security through obscurity goes out of vogue.

  165. iTunes != iTMS by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    It's pretty seamlessly integrated, so we'll forgive your confusion.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  166. In Related News by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

    The Register posts a story reporting that Slashdot has posted a story about The Register posting a story...

    --
    I can't afford a sig!
  167. Another option by StringBlade · · Score: 1
    Rip your own CDs to Ogg Vorbis and don't worry about it.

    I realize most people (with the Slashdot crowd exception) don't know much about Ogg Vorbis and don't have any problem with MP3. But the battle's just begining.

    Microsoft wants to push its DRM with the WMA format, iTunes and iPod use other methods of DRM through the devices and software with the MP3 format. But both WMA and MP3 suffer from a major problem in that neither compression codec is free or open.

    MP3 players/burners (hardware or software) must collect some money with which to pay royalties for use of (de)compression codecs. WMA is the same way if anyone besides Microsoft provides the software to (de)compress the format. Enter Ogg.

    Ogg Vorbis was developed in the open source community and is free of royalties and most restrictions (no more than any other open source software). Some tests have shown that Ogg Vorbis does a better job of retaining sound quality at high compression ratios. And finally, the best reason to switch: There are Ogg Vorbis player for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X that don't suffer from any restrictions. (In linux, XMMS no longer plays MP3s due to licensing restrictions.)

    For the curious, a couple places to start looking for players and more information about Ogg Vorbis are:

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
  168. Bush/A$$croft taking our rights away by dethl · · Score: 1

    At least Clinton wasn't gun-ho about taking our rights away.

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  169. Why don't we compare licensing terms? by kylef · · Score: 1
    Which is curious, considering the fact that the AAC format is an industry standard, while the WMA format is purely a Microsoft format.

    AAC is a proprietary format designed by Dolby Laboratories (Sony and Fraunhofer signed on after the fact) which requires a license to use. The licensing terms can be found here.

    WMA is a proprietary format developed by Microsoft. It is a proven industry standard, already in use by thousands of consumer-level electronic devices. The licensing terms can be found here.

    Note that AAC is considerably more expensive to use, and therefore isn't any more "open" than WMA. And given that WMA is used by thousands more devices than AAC, wouldn't it be considered the "industry standard" and not the other way around?

    1. Re:Why don't we compare licensing terms? by FuzzieNorn · · Score: 1

      So, where's Microsoft's openly available specification for WMA?

    2. Re:Why don't we compare licensing terms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AAC is not a proprietary format designed by Dolby! (You are thinking of AC3.)

      AAC is an MPEG standard and is the combination of technologies contributed by those (companies) that participated in the creation of the MPEG spec.

      Dolby was assigned the responsibility of handling licensing for MPEG AAC, however the revenue generated by this licensing is split between all of the MPEG members that participated in the creation of AAC and who hold patents on the technology: Dolby, Fraunhofer, NTT, etc. It is very much the same situation with Layer 3 (MP3) but in this case the licensing is handled by (Thompson?) and again the revenue is split between all of the MPEG members that participated in the creation of MP3.

      A case in point - I have AAC evaluation tools (encoder and decoder) from about 5 years ago that were developed by Fraunhofer, not Dolby! At that time, I think it was possible to license AAC but not through Dolby - Dolby had yet to be appointed as the rep for licensing the technology.

  170. The difference by mcc · · Score: 1

    Is that iTunes, in the preferences, will let you set your default ripping format to be mp3.

    WMP will not, unless you buy an add-on. It makes you use WMA. Hmm. And though I don't know becuase I don't use windows, as far as I can tell, the DRM is non-optional. I have a friend who recorded himself performing a few short classical pieces he performed himself on the piano. He recorded them in WMP. They now have this bizarre DRM embedded into them which cannot by any means be removed, and the files can only be played on the one computer at a time "designated", and they can only be played when you are connected to the internet and Microsoft's servers are responding.

    Yeah, when apple *SELLS* music, they use AAC. This is pure pragmatism. By using 128 kbps AAC they can get the same sound quality as 192 kbps mp3 with reduced storage and transmission costs. There is no reason whatsoever they could not have used mp3 with their DRM wrapper; they chose AAC for efficiency purposes.

  171. No, that's standard. by mcc · · Score: 1

    No, that's the standard nonsense. We've been getting this for YEARS in mac discussion channels. Apple is a monopoly, and more closed than MS, because you can only buy Apple products from Apple.

    I suppose by this same logic, Charmin is a monopoly, because you can only buy Charmin Toilet Paper from Charmin. And Blockbuster is a monopoly in the same sense iTunes is, because when you are physically inside of a Blockbuster franchise, you can't rent movies from Hollywood Video.

    Microsoft isn't a monopoly, though, they're just successful.

  172. The Onion[tm] meets The Real World[tm] by Merlinus · · Score: 1
    Microsoft monopoly says Apple monopoly is too restrictive ...

    Sounds like an Onion headline! Truth is stranger than fiction, I guess.

  173. You don't understand what choice MS means by kylef · · Score: 1
    If you want to buy music from the store then you're limited to iTunes (or Quicktime) and the iPod but how is this different from buying DRM-ed music in WMA format? You're limited to Windows Media Player and a portable machine that supports it (ok, so there are more of those available).

    You're missing Microsoft's point, like just about everyone else who has posted today. The point is this:

    If you choose to use iTunes, you can ONLY buy online music from Apple's iTunes Music Store. This is the way it will always be, since iTunes is integrated with iTMS and iTMS is the only online music store selling properly licensed (DRM) conent in the iTunes/iPod AAC format.

    If you use Windows Media Player, you will be able to buy online music from serveral different services, like Napster, BuyTunes, etc. Several different companies are distributing online music using the WMA format. Not to mention, you will be able to play back this content on thousands more electronic devices that support WMA.

    That is the choice MS is talking about. The choice of online music retailer, and the choice of playback device. It's about marketplace competition to sell you a service that doesn't exist when you run iTunes.

    Having iTunes available for Windows offers yet another choice for Windows users, and that's fine and dandy. But the MS point is still valid.

    1. Re:You don't understand what choice MS means by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see what you mean now.

      The concept of buying from several different online music retaillers all with their own terms and conditions in the DRM schemes is a scary thought. It would be a nightmare to organise and keep track of what you bought from where!

      Choice is good, but between one seller offering me a good deal and several sellers with a dodgy product I'm going with the single seller, even if there is a danger that your sole supplier is going to do something you don't like in the future,

    2. Re:You don't understand what choice MS means by marcinjeske · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone is free to sell AAC files. In fact, MusicMatch has publicly stated it will if the format proves popular. How is that lock-in by iTunes?

      iTunes Music Store sells AAC, but does not lock you in to buying ONLY AAC. It doesn't even lock you into using iTunes (to play your music), as the DRM lives in QuickTime, so pretty much any software which supports QuickTime 6 can play iTMS AAC files.

      iTunes plays practically everything BUT WMA... so iTunes will happily work with any source of MP3, AAC, WAV, AIFF, etc. files. Drawing on QuickTime and publicly available plug-ins, iTunes can play from these files:

      (yes, I'm lazy and just pasting stuff from Apple's website)
      AIFF, AU, Audio CD, AVI, DV, MIDI, MPEG-1, MP3, MPEG-2, MPEG-4, MOV, WAV, Ogg Vorbis (with plug-in), etc.

      in these encodings:

      24-bit integer
      32-bit floating point
      32-bit integer
      64-bit floating point
      AAC (MPEG-4 Audio)
      ALaw 2:1
      AMR Narrowband
      IMA 4:1
      MACE 3:1
      MACE 6:1
      MS ADPCM (decode only)
      QDesign Music 2
      Qualcomm PureVoice (QCELP)
      ULaw 2:1

  174. Can it be hooked into? by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's complaint seems largely to be whinging that Apple is the sole seller. But does anyone know if the Windows version of iTunes makes it hard for a third party to provide a separate selling service that would automagically work with and update iTunes?

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  175. the fact is that AAC is a standard ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    AAC used by Apple is a part of MPEG specifications. There is a number of alternative AAC encoders/decoders. OTOH, Microsoft format is 100% microsoft-only.

  176. Microsoft never fails to amaze me... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    "Unless Apple decides to make radical changes to their service model, a Windows-based version of iTunes will still remain a closed system, where iPod owners cannot access content from other services."

    Trying to make people believe they have a real concern over people getting locked into a proprietary system makes me want to hurl big green chunks...

    The only concern they may have is that people could get locked into a proprietary system that they do not control.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  177. really poor analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iTMS is the razor, and iPods are the blades.

    that makes very little sense. Are you trying to
    say that if we subscribe to itms, we'll all buy
    several dozen ipods over the next year?

  178. I'm laughing, M$ is dead. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Microsoft has taken forever to get a music service. The Register offers two reasons for this:

    While Microsoft was under investigation for anti-competitive[**] behavior against Netscape and Sun, it couldn't afford to be too blatant about squeezing utility companies out of the Windows 'ecosystem'. This is, at least, is one possible narrative to explain why Windows Media Player still lacks so many useful integrated features. Another is that Microsoft's notorious bureaucracy and slack coding might explain its failure to produce competive or coherent software, but we shall be charitable here, and if only for the sake of argument, discount this narrative altogether.

    I posit a third, there are no Microsoft developers left. No one is going to risk their time, money and energy making something for Microsoft to steal. There was a brief period when Microsoft had the cheapest and easiest platform for developers to get and use. Those days are long gone.

    With no developers, nothing left to steal and nothing left to give, Microsoft is useless. Microsoft is stagnant and will remain that way. They are busy trying to make hardware lockouts, digital rights denial and other fuck you tools that no one wants but Microsoft and big dumb companies. They deserve each other.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I'm laughing, M$ is dead. by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      With no developers, nothing left to steal and nothing left to give, Microsoft is useless.

      They do manufacture the best FUD money can buy!

      Peace be with you,
      -jimbo

  179. Just get on with DRM by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 1
    So we can get on with downloading our 1970's swedish prog-rock that can't be bought anywhere anyway. The Billboard-50 downloaders just flood our networks rendering the P2P system a little less useful for those music afficionados who are _actually_ deprived from the music distribution industry and who _actually_ need to use such schemes to get to their fix of raw, unpolished drugged out psych-jazz-rock.

    Sure, if I ever found out how to compensate the members of Kultivator for all the great time they've given me...

  180. Er... by UncleRage · · Score: 1

    And Audio Hijack Pro for OS X also allows you to save the file as an MP3.

    But, er, uhm... what exactly is your point?

    How much time am I saving by (timed using my cable connection):

    1. Buy and download an album (or a cd's worth of music) from ITMS. (1 min 34 seconds)

    2. Play said album and hihack the audio to save/convert. (64 minutes)

    3. Convert said audio (if necessary). (3 minutes)

    4. ****

    5. Profit! Er, sorry. Wrong post.

    Okay, so... I can spend 68 minutes "intercepting" an album that would take me approximately 7 minutes to do otherwise (download, burn and import as MP3 -- or, non-DRM'd AAC).

    Thanks for suggesting that I waste my time!

    ----

    --
    #SickNotWeak
    1. Re:Er... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me, but I don't get your point.

      My suggestion was to those folks who are offended by the DRM and the file format of the iTMS music files. The solution of buring a CD and ripping from the CD is a waste of time and money and blank CDs.

      Intercept the data as the downloaded is playing and save it as MP3. Voila! No DRM, No playlist buring restrictions, No networking limtations.

      You've leagally downloaded music and used your right to make a backup copy you can use anywhere.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  181. Satire Alert!!! by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1

    Caution...Satire Alert...Please step to the side...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  182. I don't see the hypocrisy by rodrigo_braz · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I am wrong, but MS is claiming that iTunes *technically* restricts the user somehow (I don't know how much of this is true since I don't really know the service very well). This is *much* different than the MS monopoly based on an overwhelming installed base of Windows, but without explicit technical restrictions to competitors.

    It seems to me there would be hypocrisy only if Windows *technically* prevented other software (like other browsers or office suites for example) to be run.

    Rodrigo

  183. Who cares about # of computers? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    What good is a service like iTunes to you if you can't download the songs at a reaonable rate?

    Canada has over twice the broadband penetration as the US, and has had for quite some time.

    http://www.point-topic.com/content/DSLAnalysis/Bro adband penetration.htm

    Note this is 5 broadband lines *per 100 population* difference, not just *per computer*, so it is an even higher disparity then you may first think.

  184. Re:in related news... by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    even bill clinton mentioned several times that saddam possessed nuclear capability. as for material breach, hans blox last report was very clear. he was without a doubt.

    saddam posed a very real, present, and credible threat to us, and the targets of terrorists. period. this is indisputable. he was responsible for hundreds of thousands of murders. that is undeniable.

    there were major intelligence flaws. our cia needs an enema, in a big way. but what many are calling lies are simply different interpretations of the same information. we are in a war for or survival. some might not see it, nor choose to believe it, but we are. we must take the fight to the enemy. we have been in this war for 20+ years, dating back to the tehran hostage situation. they do not need to declare war, and in fact, they won't.

    bush is hardly a fascist. your hatred makes you see things that aren't there. he is not destroying liberty. time to grow up. your not three, stop temper tantrum, and go back to your desk and start your homework

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  185. not really. by iriles · · Score: 1

    I am a little disappointed in iTMS's selection actually. Maybe I'm missing something but, No
    Chemical Brothers or Leftfield, and what about the best New Order album Substance, and Bjork's Vespertine or Homogenic

    These aren't exactly small artists, and I had been hoping to buy some of the more obscure stuff. :(

    Hopefully it just takes time for them to build up their catalog.

    1. Re:not really. by webvictim · · Score: 1

      Hopefully it just takes time for them to build up their catalog.

      You mean, you have to wait until they've downloaded the tunes off Kazaa... ;)

      --
      When did I realise I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly realised I was talking to myself.
  186. Apple supports MORE devices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets not forget that WMA is a closed system, and even more so than protected AAC. Also, remember that Apple has negotiated the most lenient DRM to date, allowing users to make unlimited burns to CD with protected AACs. This enables songs from the store to work with thousands of devices already out there. In any case, WMA is the limiting choice here; the iPod is far superior to any other MP3 device, far sexier, and, even if you don't have the money for an iPod, you can still use iTunes to organized your own MP3s and directly add them to iTunes compatible players (Which is almost 90% of those out there). And if one wants to use the store and doesn't have an iPod, he may just listen on his computer(s), or burn the songs he downloads to a CD. M$ has been outpaced this time, and loosing market share within their own market is frightening to them. As other users have said, M$ is just scare

  187. Hmmm, use software and hardware restricted to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one company's idea of what is appropriate use, or use hardware and software that may be used how I see fit? I think I'll go with the latter, thank you. If someone from Microsoft sees that and comments on it, then there's proof that MS has intelligent people. If slahdot readers can't see beyond the MS name, then that proves they are not capable of rational thought.

    Apple seeks to restrict use of the iPod and iTunes. How that is good is beyond me. So I can't use any software but iTunes to write to my iPod? How does that benefit me? Virtually every other MP3 player on the market allows the user options for uploading music.

    What happens when the RIAA insist that Apple make iTunes only transfer music that has been purchased from the Music Store? What if they insist that iTunes make your MP3 files unreadable by other software once they have been used to populate the iPod, by changing their format?

    So, I buy music from the Apple Music Store, but I can't listen to it on my existing MP3 player, or through my preferred MP3 software? I can buy the music, but the vendor can determine how I enjoy it? No thanks. That's not buying, that's paying for limited use. Let's not pret
    HOSI own it when the vendor determines its use.

  188. Splitting hairs . . . by Kris+Magnusson · · Score: 1

    It's a pedantic point, but all corporations have monopolies on the goods they produce. That's the benefit of being a corporation--monopolizing your own goods and services. That's why Apple and Microsoft get to decide that no one else can make Macintosh computers or Windows software.

    Note that having a monopoly on the goods and services you produce does not necessarily make you a monopoly of an entire marketplace like Microsoft, which is what most people think of when they hear the word "monopoly." (Used to be Standard Oil or ALCOA.)

    --
    "I thought I could organize freedom. How Scandinavian of me."
  189. Re:This from the restriction overlords themselves. by cookiepus · · Score: 1

    they would have launched their own music download service months ago.

    If they did, wouldn't you be blaming them for anti-competitive practices, and for using their desktop monopoly against the "good guys" like iTMS?

    I can just imagine you, about 7 years ago, saying "If MSFT understood the web, they would have bundled a browser into their OS months ago. They suck, unlike Netscape. Netscape gets it"

    Just imagine if every shiny new Dell came with a big BUY MUSIC icon right on the destop. And hey, Dell's got this great promotion: since you bought a PC from them, you get to download 5 songs from MicrosoftTunes for free! All of a sudden you've got a huge new market of people who just discovered buying music online - and hey it's just a buck a song. iTunes? Never heard of it.

    Do you think that would get MS into legal trouble the way MSIE being embedded did?

  190. This applies to MS and Video too by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    My next laptop is definitely going to be a Mac... I have used PCs pretty much exclusively for 10 years or so (*nix and a little bit of mac sneak in occasionally), and it wasn't until I started using Movie Maker 2 on XP that I just spat it and got fed up with Microsoft.

    I made my little movie and then simply wanted to burn it to a VCD or DVD format on a CD so that my family could see it...

    Could I?

    Nope.

    Oh, they do have a 'burn to CD' option... but what format does it burn to? Some bloody MS format I've never heard of that apparently will be in all sorts of consumer products... bull... why would anyone bother putting that in their product when burning movies to DVD with a Mac is so straight forward?

    There's no option to save to MPG, just nothing other than Microsoft (Other than ridiculously large DV files).

    Bah to them... They've completely given up trying to make things as easy as possible and decided to try and force people to only use their software.

    Well piss off.

  191. iTunes window can shrink..... by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    iTunes can be minimized to a little block to control the player. i don't know what does it on the windows version.... does it still have the "traffic light" on the top left? try there. Also for mac users(soon for windows?), there are hacks to itunes and something called "iTunes remote" that has been out for a long time... it lets you set up all kinds on configurations to control iTunes. For example one was a very thin strip that could run along the top or bottom of your screen. i have not used it in at least a year, but it exists and worked well... i just don't need it on a desktop with 2 CRTs.

  192. Re:Bush has never lied moron by the+web · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...I find your ideas intriguing. Please subscribe me to your mailing list.

    --
    __
    Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
  193. A big steaming bowl of delicious irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AAC isn't used on the Windows side because of the licensing fee involved.

    Wasn't Microsoft one of the parties involved in setting this fee?

    So isn't Microsoft therefore responsible for iTunes and iPod being so 'horribly restricted'?

  194. "A means to an end." by Osiris+Ani · · Score: 1
    "Its not useful as a form of protection, its useful as a means to an end."
    Now that's a nice way to come full-circle when speaking of a product that originated on the Mac.

    Jobs: "The Mac is a desktop appliance, the first since the telephone."
    Murray: "I looked up 'appliance' in the dictionary, and it said that an appliance was 'a means to an end.' That's the Mac. It's a means to an end."

    - Steve Jobs (Project Manager, Macintosh) & Mike Murray (Marketing Manager, Macintosh) at the unveiling of the Mac, January 30, 1984

  195. It's not about the number of file formats! by kylef · · Score: 1
    iTunes Music Store sells AAC, but does not lock you in to buying ONLY AAC.

    Yes it does. No online music retailer in its right mind would use non-DRM music formats today. And iTunes supports only one: AAC. So if you're buying licensed online music and using iTunes, you're using AAC. And since only one online store sells AAC music files compatible with iTunes, that's what you will use: iTunes Music Store. When MusicMatch actually releases something, then you can say you have a choice.

    It doesn't even lock you into using iTunes (to play your music), as the DRM lives in QuickTime, so pretty much any software which supports QuickTime 6 can play iTMS AAC files.

    Gee, that's a good defense of iTunes! Critic: "iTunes is too restrictive, users would better be served elsewhere to get more choices." Respondent: "What do you mean it's too restrictive? You don't have to use iTunes to listen to your music at all!" Critic: "Uh, that's exactly what we're saying... don't use iTunes and you won't be restricted..."

    iTunes plays practically everything BUT WMA... so iTunes will happily work with any source of MP3, AAC, WAV, AIFF, etc. files.

    By listing the non-DRM formats that iTunes supports, you are dodging the issue at hand: online music distribution formats. Sites like Napster et. al. could not care less whether iTunes plays AIFF or u-law files (or even, dare I say, Mp3 files).

    Online music retailers care only about DRM-ready file formats that prevent copying. For iTunes, this format is AAC. The days of online Mp3 sales are numbered, because record companies hate allowing kids to copy away and share at will.

    To understand Microsoft's argument, you need answer only two questions:

    1. Name some companies (other than Apple) that sell AAC music online for iTunes.
    2. Name some devices other than iPod that sync with iTunes.

    All of a sudden, the choices seem limited from my perspective...

    1. Re:It's not about the number of file formats! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Almost all portable music players will sync with iTunes - just don't expect them to play AAC files.

      However, if you're only using mp3/wav/aif etc then it doesn't really mattter that only the iPod supports AAC. If you want to use AAC you'll get an iPod or just deal with not being able to take your music on the road.

    2. Re:It's not about the number of file formats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, your first question is phrased badly (of course no-one else sells muic for iTunes other than Apple at the moment). Lets look at the MS arguement, that you can use WMP right now to buy music online from a variey of places, and that at this moment only Apple sell music online for iTunes.

      Sellers need to build some sort or DRM in to their sales, and one of the biggest problem is getting consumers to accept it. AAC files that you can burn to CD and then re-rip provide a middle ground that seems to satisfy everyone but the "I want online music at maximum quality" crowd (buy the CD).

      As for your second question, name a device that doesn't. Sure, you can't use AAC files on anything other than an iPod (I may well be wrong here, but I've not tried). But MP3? I've had a Rio and a few brands of thumbnail MP3 players that I've updated from both PC and Mac through iTunes.

      So perhaps the question is really why doesn't WMP support iPods, why does WMP convert your MP3's to .wma files, why doesn't WMP allow you to rip files into the format of your choice?

    3. Re:It's not about the number of file formats! by marcinjeske · · Score: 1
      It doesn't even lock you into using iTunes (to play your music), as the DRM lives in QuickTime, so pretty much any software which supports QuickTime 6 can play iTMS AAC files.
      Gee, that's a good defense of iTunes! Critic: "iTunes is too restrictive, users would better be served elsewhere to get more choices." Respondent: "What do you mean it's too restrictive? You don't have to use iTunes to listen to your music at all!" Critic: "Uh, that's exactly what we're saying... don't use iTunes and you won't be restricted..."
      Once again, iTunes != iTMS. iTMS does not lock you in to using iTunes. You can use any QuickTime compatible player. Although I would consider iTunes a pretty good QuickTime compatible player.
      Name some companies (other than Apple) that sell AAC music online for iTunes.
      AFIAK, Apple is the first to sell AAC music online... but Audible.com does sell audio content that will work in iTunes and on iPod.
      Name some devices other than iPod that sync with iTunes.
      To be pedantic, most music players with any aspirations to be sold to Mac users will sync with iTunes, and that's a lot of mp3 players. What you probably meant was:

      Name some devices other than iPod that play AAC:

      Nokia Music Player
      http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,5184,4226,00.html
      I especially like this quote from their website:

      15. Does Nokia Music Player support WMA? No. Nokia has chosen AAC because of the quality and MP3 because of the wide usage.

      Nokia N-Gage

      Panasonic SD Audio Player (several versions)
      http://panasonic.com/consumer_electronics/ewear/sd _audio_players.asp

      iRiver iDP-100 (though I'm not certain it is a current product)

      That's "some" devices.

      Marcin

  196. Apple is a monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when did this happen?

    Apple got control of a market and is sqeezing others out of it through anti-competitive tactics?

    hmmm, let's see, they don't control the graphics, video editing, office, desktop, or any market. they have the most open music service available, but they don't control that market either. they shave simply been successful in it, by being the most open.

    i'm sure Apple would be flattered that The Register thinks it has equal influence to Microsoft in any market, but that analogy is flawed to the core. maybe we should send the register the link to the definition of monopoly. i honestly think they don't know what it is.

  197. An Open letter to Microsoft's David Fester: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An Open letter to Microsoft's David Fester:

    Shut the fuck up you stupid fucking ass hat. I hope that Bill Gates himself gives you a dirty Sanchez and then your heart explodes.
    Burn in hell.

    Sincerely,
    Anonymous Coward.

  198. Yes, but... by csoto · · Score: 0

    This is not what the author was arguing. Really, it's a stretch to claim anything "bad" about iTMS. iTunes issues notwithstanding, it's still good news for Windows users...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom