Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Episode 3 Release Date Announced

snitty writes "Lucas Films has announced the release date for the last movie in the trilogy of prequels. The date is set for May 19, 2005. The title of the movie has yet to be released. I think I'll give it another year or so before I get on line for tickets."

533 comments

  1. Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Time for a thread triage. Everyone complaining about how Star Wars is terrible and your childhood is ruined, reply here. People discussing Lucas and his never-ending quest to rape the franchise for more money, over on the left. Speculation about what crazy-assed title Lucas will come up for on this one, on the right. GNAA, you know what to do.

    1. Re:Uh-oh by glassesmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meee Saa Thinkssa Itsssa Gonnna Succkssaa

    2. Re:Uh-oh by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 4, Funny
      I was going to reply with my thoughts on him raping MY childhood and then I realized, I don't even care anymore...

      feels good.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    3. Re:Uh-oh by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually my comment fits into both (2) and (3), since I predict the title will be: Star Wars III: Even More Action Figures to Buy

    4. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X-GNAA-Fag-Status: 0.998672 (ultra-gay)
      X-Anti-Fagus: 0 (my not use anti-fagus)

    5. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the title is in the article:

      Star Wars: Episode III The Shrine of the Sith

    6. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who the fuck are you? Mario?

      (Yes...I know he's trying to be Jar Jar...but put an Italian accent to it and imagine the bootup sequence of Mario 64.)

    7. Re:Uh-oh by LousyPhreak · · Score: 1

      *waves with hand* ep1s0d3 111 r0ckz0rz

      --
      -- Karma: beyond good and evil - mostly affected by posting political
    8. Re:Uh-oh by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Or Star Wars III: Just Fork It Over, Fanboy

      I probably wouldn't bother to see it, except I know my kids will want to, and it's more fun with kids since they have no preconceptions.

      And let's face it, whether the movies suck to us or not, the kids are the intended audience. It's too bad, though, because the best kids entertainment (Warner Brothers cartoons, Old Disney movies) is also good entertainment for adults.

      When my kids were younger (around 3-5 range) I found they would watch _anything_ animated. Back when Dilbert was on TV, or at least the first four episodes or so before I decided it sucked, I watched it and "Home Movies" would follow. If anyone has seen that show, its pace of catatonic and the squiggle-vision animation was just quarter-assed. The ad-libbed dialog was soporific, but my kids stood there transfixed. Finally after about 5 minutes I turned it off and we all went on. Now I realize that show was actually not a kid's show (and that some people really liked it), but the point it, kids will watch anything. The excellent artist and entertainers will _still_ give them quality material that their parents will enjoy. I think Lucas has more or less given up on that.

      The recent parody of Lucas on the Simpsons was amusing, but it was also so heavy-handed as to almost seem sad, but I bet most of us /. types enjoyed it.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  2. A New Hope? by strictnein · · Score: 1, Funny

    One can only hope that Episode III is as good as Episode I and II.

    1. Re:A New Hope? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      It couldn't be much worse.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    2. Re:A New Hope? by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Funny
      One can only hope that Episode III is as good as Episode I and II

      One can only hope that you're wrong.

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    3. Re:A New Hope? by greendoggg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, don't underestimate Lucas. It could be worse. Much worse. Way worse. Worse than you or I can even imagine.

    4. Re:A New Hope? by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I dunno, I can imagine quite a lot."

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:A New Hope? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ironically, if it got any worse, it might cause mass rioting, which from some points of view might be better.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    6. Re:A New Hope? by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yeah, but you know right after we see it we'll be cheering it on. Then the next day we'll realize how horrible it was.

      --
      Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
    7. Re:A New Hope? by andman42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Episode III? Ahh, who cares.

      I'm still waiting for Spaceballs II: The Search For More Money

    8. Re:A New Hope? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      I hope camping out the lines for the 3rd movie will be as rewarding as camping out for the first two.
      Star Wars lines teh Bomb!!!!!1

    9. Re:A New Hope? by kalidasa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nice one. Let's face, though, we don't have to imagine it: we've all seen it: Howard the Duck.
      [And now, kalidasa waits to become the first poster in /. history to get a -2 mod while horrified moderators try to re-suppress their memories of that horrifying experience featuring Lea Thompson Tim Robbins, and a walking, talking, animatronic duck/guitarist.]

    10. Re:A New Hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone set us up the bomb

    11. Re:A New Hope? by katarac · · Score: 1

      Howard the Duck makes a surprising (and bewildering) appearance as a bonus figure with the new Marvel Legends Silver Surfer figure.

    12. Re:A New Hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was quite good.

      --

      Taco

    13. Re:A New Hope? by rockmanac · · Score: 1

      One of my friends did "Spaceballs 4: The Search for Spaceballs 3" or something like that as a class project... All I remember about the things is that is how I got the nickname "Sparky"

      Now, since we're on the topic of Starwars (general topic anyway),the same guy that did that is doing a Star Wars fan film.. I'd give out the link but I don't think his site can handle a Slashdotting.

      -A

    14. Re:A New Hope? by hamsterboy · · Score: 1

      That's "quite a bit," you insensitive clod!

    15. Re:A New Hope? by blitziod · · Score: 1

      yea that movie was one of the all time worst. I was surprised, the comic howard teh duck was GREAT!

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    16. Re:A New Hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now, since we're on the topic of Starwars (general topic anyway),the same guy that did that is doing a Star Wars fan film.. I'd give out the link but I don't think his site can handle a Slashdotting.
      There's only one way to find out!
    17. Re:A New Hope? by morton2002 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This thread works like an old joke:

      The optimist and the pessimist are camping. The optimist wakes up and says "mmm, this is as good as it gets!". The pessimist agrees :)

    18. Re:A New Hope? by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      You mean the power to destroy a planet is insignificant compared to the power of George Lucas's creative ignorance?

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    19. Re:A New Hope? by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      That's "someone set up us the bomb", you insensitive clod.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    20. Re:A New Hope? by goodhell · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know what you mean.

      When's History of the World: Part 2 coming out?

    21. Re:A New Hope? by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that saying, "Optimists believe that this is the best possible world; pessimists fear that this is true."

    22. Re:A New Hope? by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

      JarJar married with an Ewok ?

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    23. Re:A New Hope? by graikor · · Score: 1

      I actually enjoyed Howard the Duck, although I haven't seen it since the 80's, and I'm fairly certain it wouldn't be as fun as I remembered...

      And a pic of my Howard the Duck figurine included with the Silver Surfer figure...

    24. Re:A New Hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still waiting for Spaceballs III - The Search For Spaceballs II

    25. Re:A New Hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is parent post redundant?? It was like the third reply to the article.

      F'en stupid mods these days.
      Go suck a duck.

  3. 13 months!? by dragin33 · · Score: 1

    Man, this must be my un-lucky day or something

  4. Whee by dwaggie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's to hoping he decided to put a little more thought into dialogue and less into the special effects.

    1. Re:Whee by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because there was a lot of thought put into the original trilogy.

      (Upon return from the death star)
      "Luke!"

      "Carrie!"

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Whee by xSauronx · · Score: 0, Redundant

      and heres to wishful thinking...because you can probably bet he didnt, given the money hes made so far on shitty dialogue and tons of special effects.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    3. Re:Whee by Kenja · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope they get rid of all the dialog given how bad it was in the last two movies. In fact, get rid of the actors as well. Hell, lets just do without the whole movie.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Whee by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Here's to hoping he decided to put a little more thought into dialogue and less into the special effects."

      It won't happen. Coincidently, I watched AotC last night with the commentary on. Lucas explained rather clearly that they were going after the "30's serial" style of movie. That type of movie doesn't lend itself to modern 'good' dialog.

      I don't think Lucas realizes how movie tastes have changed since ANH originally hit theaters.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Whee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is George Lucas capable of writing good dialog? I think not.

      "You can write this shit, George, but you can't say it" -- Harrison Ford.

    6. Re:Whee by macshune · · Score: 1

      >> Lucas explained rather clearly that they were going after the "30's serial" style of movie. That type of movie doesn't lend itself to modern 'good' dialog.

      Heh, you KNOW it's gonna be good when he starts making excuses even before the title is released!:)

      Also, when I think '30s movies, I think silent movies, even though talkies had been introduced before then. Given Anakin's acting ability, he should be much better with colorful interstitial signs explaining the scene rather than any sort of dialog coming out of his mouth.

      >>I don't think Lucas realizes how movie tastes have changed since ANH originally hit theaters.

      Yeah...He also doesn't realize that the composition of the audience didn't change between May 25, 1977 & May 25, 1983 so to be comprised entirely of 7-year old girls (see Ewoks). Also, someone should take it upon themselves to inform him that this non-existent demographic sea-change didn't keep on rockin' until Episode 1 came out (see: Jar-Jar).

    7. Re:Whee by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Well, with geoge lucas writing dialog, less IS better....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    8. Re:Whee by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Huh? I can't decide if this comment is a troll or should be modded +5 funny. Lucas spend more thought on dialogue and less on special effects? Hah! Never!

    9. Re:Whee by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Here's to hoping he decided to put a little more thought into dialogue and less into the special effects.

      That would give us Beavis and Butthead.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    10. Re:Whee by Finuvir · · Score: 4, Funny

      We'll make our own sequel, with blackjack and hookers. In fact, screw the movie.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    11. Re:Whee by dan501 · · Score: 1

      special like the olympics?

      --
      my livejournal is interesting and worth reading - I swear. I know everyone thinks their blog is interesting. mine is.
    12. Re:Whee by evilkarl · · Score: 1

      I agre thee GL has in the past pushed the envelope when it comes to CGI in moves how ever CGI is meant to be eye candy there should be a really plot the interaction between the characters involved should come before the CGI. If someone else wrote the dialogue and/or the script this movie would have a chance of not sucking how ever unless george has learnt from his past 2 mistakes (ep I & II) I fear the movie will be dreadful. Use real sets, use less special effects or more subtle special effects. It really detracts from a film when it is really obvious that something was done on a blue screen it disrupts the immersion if you notice it.

      --
      Everyone is stupid, it is just the degree that varies
    13. Re:Whee by OpenSourceOfAllEvil · · Score: 1

      You mean like all the winningly romantic dialog between Anakin and Amidala? I might have bought their romance if it was silent and shorter. But no amount of dialog could capture the visual splendor of Yoda getting wired up on sugar and going after Count Dookie like a kid on a pinata.

    14. Re:Whee by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1
      Woosh!

      It should have been "Leia," not Carrie, the name of the actor.

    15. Re:Whee by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Great lines like

      "Only a master of Evil, Darth"
      "But I was going to go to Toshi station to pick up some power converters!"
      "Who is the bigger fool, the fool or the fool who follows him?"

      So if you're expecting better lines than those, don't show up to the movie. Not like Lucas needs your money anyway.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    16. Re:Whee by bruce+RedHead · · Score: 1

      DIALOG?? It's a SPFX movie!! If you wnat dialog, get a book. The only reason I ever watched the other Start Wars movies is for the effects and to find editing and storyline errors..

      Too much dialog confuses me.

      OH NO! I've typed WORDS! Quick - Somebody blow up something or crash some spaceship into a planet!

      OH, I've gotta go - My wife just put in Pride and Prejudice and I want some SERIOUS DIALOGUE!

    17. Re:Whee by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      And let's not forget:

      "Echo 3 to Echo 7, Han ol' Buddy, do you read me?"
      "There isn't enough life on this ice cube to fill a space cruiser!"

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  5. Pirate date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    What's the date for the pirated release?

    1. Re:Pirate date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      May 14, 2005

    2. Re:Pirate date? by raider_red · · Score: 2, Funny

      It'll be on your p2p client of choice by around 7:00 tomorrow.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    3. Re:Pirate date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May 14, 2005

      That's for the "official" version. The "director's cut" will be sometime this summer.

    4. Re:Pirate date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already checked that one, it's really animal porn. Don't bother downloading it.

    5. Re:Pirate date? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about butt piracy, it's still May 19 2005.

    6. Re:Pirate date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why's it have a .vbs extension?

    7. Re:Pirate date? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      How about the release date for the Phantom Edit cut?

      Speaking of which, was there a "phantom edit" of Ep. 2?

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    8. Re:Pirate date? by QEDog · · Score: 1
      It'll be on your p2p client of choice by around 7:00 tomorrow.

      Can anyone post the torrent for that instead?

      --
      "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
    9. Re:Pirate date? by jonnystiph · · Score: 1
      May 14, 2005


      Hey right on my birthday. A present from the pirates, better than the eye patch I got last year.

      --

      If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

    10. Re:Pirate date? by fpp · · Score: 1

      Not a phantom edit, per se, but the IMAX version of "Clones" is far better than the original release. It takes out a bunch of lame love scenes, plus some other trims here and there, and the whole movie plays much better.

      Plus, when Anakin goes out looking for his mother, and is talking to a Jawa, you can actually see all the activity going on inside the sandcrawler in the distance. Now THAT was cool.

    11. Re:Pirate date? by tepples · · Score: 1

      "Butt piracy"? Does that mean making infringing copies of porn movies?

    12. Re:Pirate date? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      No, it means distributing infringing pictures of your but. You see, genes can be patented nowadays. Therefore, because your genes have been patented by a corporation, and your but is a derivative product of said genes, distributing unauthorized pictures of it is against IP laws.

      The licence cost and terms for reproduction is still under debate.

      Your right to replace dead cells is currently considered fair use; this, however, is being lobbied to be changed by industry lobbiers.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  6. Great by thaddjuice · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great, now I have to wait a year and some change to bitch about how bad Episode 3 is.

    --
    Find me in ~/.sig
    1. Re:Great by NurseMaximum · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't see why - no-one else will

      --
      Who meta-moderates the meta-moderators?
    2. Re:Great by Ateryx · · Score: 1
      Great, now I have to wait a year and some change to bitch about how bad Episode 3 is.


      Maybe, but luckily for you I'm sure after this upcoming film, Lucas will decided "Hey, how about I turn out some more dogshit, and make another 100 million or so before I die? Better me than anyone else raping 'my genius'"


      So truely, this isn't the end of the bitching about Lucas/Starwars/etc... its just the end of the begining.

      --
      "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
    3. Re:Great by dafz1 · · Score: 1

      What will /. have to talk about after May 2005? Episode 3 will be out, and the SCO v. the World will be over.

      The worst part? We know how both of them end(1 for the good guys[SCO is crushed], 1 for the bad[Anakin whoops some Kenobi a**]).

  7. And THEN what.. by jvagner · · Score: 1

    ..Lucas do?

    1. Re:And THEN what.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck up the movies and release them as "his vision" to HD-DVD?

    2. Re:And THEN what.. by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      isnt he planning on shooting sequels, and then prequels to Howard the Duck?

    3. Re:And THEN what.. by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      He starts work on the Special Edition of "Willow" of course. At the same time he'll be getting his "Howard the Duck" prequel material together.

      See those movies sucked badly, The original Star Wars films weren't the greatest movies ever made but they were good.

      The frightening thing is that Lucas cannot tell the difference between the two.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    4. Re:And THEN what.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, don't look now, but Madmartigan's sword in Willow is gonna be replaced with Laffy Taffy, and Lucas is going to replace all the little people with CGI. For no particular reason than he could.

      Also, the movie will now be set entirely on a submarine. Thanks, ILM!

  8. Yah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    where is my sleeping bag and bag of doritos?

    Time to get in line!

  9. By released, you mean by debrain · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... to theatres, or to bittorrent?

    1. Re:By released, you mean by sdo1 · · Score: 1
      or to bittorrent?

      May 20, 2005

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    2. Re:By released, you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it should go strait to video...
      -David

    3. Re:By released, you mean by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Wrong, it should go straight to bittorrent. It's not even worth paying to rent.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  10. Title ideas? by DarkHand · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Star Wars: The Fall Of JarJar? Star Wars: A new plot? Star Wars: Time-to-start-planning-for-some-sequels-cause-the- prequels-weren't-all-that-good?

    1. Re:Title ideas? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      I saw some leaked snapshots of Anakin, and I'm betting that the title will be:

      Star Wars: A Jedi BBQ

  11. Awesome! by michael+path · · Score: 5, Funny

    Woohoo! I wonder when they'll start production on the 4th episode?

    1. Re:Awesome! by chachob · · Score: 1

      "Lucas Films has announced the release date for the last movie in the trilogy of prequels."

      I don't ;)

    2. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me thinks you missed the joke

      jar jar says: "Episode 4 was the first movie relased. Me so think you so stupid"

    3. Re:Awesome! by nandhp · · Score: 1

      Who care's about the 4th? I'm [still] waiting for Episode VII!

    4. Re:Awesome! by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Hey, given how much better 4, 5, and 6 were than 1 and 2, that means 7 and up should be wonderful!

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    5. Re:Awesome! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Woohoo! I wonder when they'll start production on the 4th episode?"

      I heard George recently bought a Delorean from his friend Bob.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Awesome! by centauri · · Score: 1

      I doubt anyone here would even want to watch it.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    7. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I heard George recently bought a Delorean from his friend Bob.


      Did he get the snow tires?

    8. Re:Awesome! by Jebathan · · Score: 1

      your a moron, complete moron. my only hopes are that you are being sarcastic.

    9. Re:Awesome! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "your a moron, complete moron. my only hopes are that you are being sarcastic."

      So I'm a moron, but you're not completely sure what I was saying? Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. You regiseterred yet another nick just to say that? What's the matter? Didn't like how I called you out last time around?

    11. Re:Awesome! by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      MOD UP!

      FUNNY!

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
  12. Wow. by NineNine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow. I think that I'm actually looking forward to my next trip to the dentist more than this movie. Actually, I'm waiting for a sequel to "Ishtar".

    1. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ishtar 2 - Attack of the clones? Doesn't seem right somehow...

    2. Re:Wow. by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, ditto that. I read a leaked script for IR (Ishtar Reloaded) and it looked cool. If they can get The Rock and Vin Diesel to do the original Hoffman and Beatty parts this is going to be summer blockbuster can't miss stuff.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    3. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If they can get The Rock and Vin Diesel..."

      America loves its mulatto sons. Just think....your girlfriend wishes you were a negro.

    4. Re:Wow. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      > Actually, I'm waiting for a sequel to "Ishtar".

      You're in luck! The sequel was just announced to be opening on May 19, 2005. Lucky you!

  13. The title will be by levik · · Score: 3, Funny
    StarWars Episode III: The License to print money

    --
    Ñ'
    1. Re:The title will be by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about Star Wars Episode III: We've Lost All Hope

      That ties in pretty well with Ep IV, I think.

    2. Re:The title will be by thebus · · Score: 1

      How about:

      Episode III: The Cost of Lordship

    3. Re:The title will be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or..

      Star Wars Episode III: The Planet of the Apes

    4. Re:The title will be by irokitt · · Score: 1

      My sincere hope is:

      Star Wars Episode III: Jar-Jar Dies!

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    5. Re:The title will be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sincere hope is:

      Star Wars Episode III: Jar-Jar Dies!


      Meesa no liken hate posts. What did meesa do wrong? Youssa have no reason for da post you put up. Meesa havva hurt feelins WHY?!?

    6. Re:The title will be by ozbird · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or link it to another successful(?) franchise:
      Star Wars Episode III: The Search For Plot.

    7. Re:The title will be by queenofthe1ring · · Score: 1

      seriously, it pretty well sums up what all of us star wars fans feel too. after the disappointing episode i and the debacle that was episode ii, i'm really not expecting much out of episode iii. however, i will go see it, out of fangirl duty. btw, here's a little something to my fellow fans, or perhaps those who would like to see star wars mocked in an amusing way... http://people.cornell.edu/pages/slp29/starwars.htm l

      --

      ~*~ ~*~ ~*~

      yes, girls read /. too...

    8. Re:The title will be by OpenSourceOfAllEvil · · Score: 1

      StarWars Episode III: No Refunds

  14. Busting out the tent by SkiddyRowe · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope AMC is okay with me camping in their lawn for the next year.

    Surviving on half-eaten bags of popcorn, drinking un-drank sodas, hoping I don't get the one used a make-shift 'restroom' for LOTR:ROTK.

    1. Re:Busting out the tent by Anarcho-Goth · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope AMC is okay with me camping in their lawn for the next year.

      So, you unemployeed too?
      And, after living rent-free for over a year, do we have to watch the movie when it comes out?
      I suppose living on the street for a year could make just about anyone deranged enough to enjoy it.

      --
      I hate Liberals and Conservatives.
      If you are a Liberal or a Conservative, then HAVE A NICE DAY!
      Courage.
    2. Re:Busting out the tent by pokeyburro · · Score: 1

      Just so long as you're okay with being the only one camped out there for the next 407 days.

      --
      Lately democracy seems to be based on the skybox, the Happy Meal box, the X-box, and the idiot box.
  15. May 19 2005 is a Thursday by saskboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why not release it on a Friday? Now people will miss at least a day of work standing in line, and Friday recovering from the night before.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry about it. We are planning to outsource your job on the 20th so you don't have to come in anyway.

    2. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Movies are generally released on thursdays.

      Not sure why, exactly, but I have a theory.

      Movie twits go to the opening, boast about the movies to their friends, who might go friday.

      And no matter how horrible the film, movie twits pump it up like it's the be all and end all of western civilisation.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought that movies were generally released on Wednesday or Friday. Do you have statistics?

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    4. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by 72beetle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FYI - It's actually because the studio can then fudge an extra day into it's 'opening weekend' reciept totals.

      --
      -Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music.
    6. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming that people actually care about this movie any more.

    7. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're usually released on Fridays. Typically, only expected "blockbusters" are released on Thursdays; I believe it's a way to get an extra day included in the opening weekend returns, thereby making the movie seem even bigger than it actually is.

    8. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by rjelks · · Score: 1

      I hate to admit it, but I'm one of those movie twits. After waiting in line for a couple of hours to see the midnight showing of "The Matrix: Reloaded, I'll never do that again. I think your right though.

      -

    9. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by saskboy · · Score: 1

      That sounds likely.

      The last blockbuster - LOTR 3 - was a waste if you bought advance tickets in my local capital city. One of the theatres selling tickets weeks in advance later decided not to show it because it's parent company wanted to hype a new Galaxy theatre in another part of town. Public outcry or maybe human decency made them show at least one screening of it to people who had "worthless" tickets they could only get a refund for, and then get in line again for the other screenings which were sold out.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    10. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      "Movie twits go to the opening, boast about the movies to their friends, who might go friday."

      Some of us folks who are *really* old actually wait 2 weeks and see a cheap Sunday matinee. I'll be 35 (going on 72) in 2 days. :)

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    11. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by boarder · · Score: 1

      Movies are NOT generally released on Thursdays. I don't know what country you live in, but in the U.S. they are released 89% of the time on Friday, and the other 9% on Wednesday (and those cases are usually blockbusters-to-be)... That is a made up statistic, but it has to be close. I think you might be confusing a 12:01 showing on Thursday (which is actually Friday) with an actual Thursday opening. Go to IMDb.com and see the Friday release dates. In a quick search around I couldn't find a Wed or Thur opening (even the new Harry Potter opens on a Friday in June). The LOTR movies were all Friday releases; Matrix Reloaded was Thur, while Revolutions was Wed; all three Harry Potter movies were/are Fri releases. Eps 1-3 are the only movies I can think of besides Reloaded that were Thur openings. "Premiers" don't count, either, since those are only in one theatre and just a celebrity press event. The movies are generally shown to critics earlier, too, so that doesn't count.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
    12. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Movie twits go to the opening, boast about the movies to their friends, who might go friday.
      And no matter how horrible the film, movie twits pump it up like it's the be all and end all of western civilisation.


      Unless it's "Gigli", in which case they text-message all their friends and tell them to get a refund before the movie starts. Then the MPAA talks about banning text-messaging because it hurts their profits.

    13. Re:May 19 2005 is a Thursday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody was talking about banning texting except for the kneejerk Slashbots. Moron.

  16. I think I'll speak for everyone... by protonman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... when I say that it will probably suck but that I'll go anyway ;-)

    Must... resist... going... to... movie...

    To paraphrase a well known SF icon.

    --
    The man of knowledge must be able not only to love his enemies but also to hate his friends.
    1. Re:I think I'll speak for everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To paraphrase a well known SF icon.

      Madonna?

    2. Re:I think I'll speak for everyone... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah you speak for me. I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is going to suck but I'm still going. It's like a train wreck in slow motion at this point. I can't not look.

      After two of these prequels I think it's like Steve Buscemi's character in Armaggedon said. "It's time to embrace the horror people". Enjoy it for what it is even if all you can do to get pleasure out of it is to make fun of it.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    3. Re:I think I'll speak for everyone... by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah that was me. I knew it (Matrix Rev) would suck really, really bad. But I loved the first movie (hated the second) so I went and saw it anyways. It sucked really, really bad. Duh.

      Fortunately for the movie industry, we consumers aren't very bright.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    4. Re:I think I'll speak for everyone... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      ... when I say that it will probably suck but that I'll go anyway ;-)

      Yeah, George Lucas is going to come to my house with a gun and force me to go to the movie.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  17. Tickets? by XaXXon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I'll give it another year or so before I get on line for tickets.

    You don't have to get a ticket to rent it at blockbuster.. I don't understand.

    1. Re:Tickets? by moltar77 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's talking about getting in the queue early for downloads via IRC. Those queues can get pretty nasty wait times.

  18. Only 408 days to go... by Geckoman · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...before we're forced to relinquish any last vestiges of hope that something can be salvaged from the smoldering wreckage that Star Wars has become.

    1. Re:Only 408 days to go... by ColonBlow · · Score: 1

      that should set us up nicely for a new hope...of some kind....hmm.

      --
      free online diet tracking.
    2. Re:Only 408 days to go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...before we're forced to relinquish any last vestiges of hope that something can be salvaged from the smoldering wreckage that Star Wars has become.

      Meesa no liken hate posts. What did meesa do wrong? Youssa have no reason for da post you put up. Meesa havva hurt feelins WHY?!?

  19. what is there to live for? by troyef · · Score: 5, Funny

    first matrix, then lord of the rings, and now the last anticipated star wars release? what else is there?

    1. Re:what is there to live for? by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm gonna go for sex. The answer is sex.

    2. Re:what is there to live for? by jas79 · · Score: 4, Funny

      duke nukem forever. That will give you a reason for at least the next decade.

    3. Re:what is there to live for? by chachob · · Score: 1

      slashdot.

    4. Re:what is there to live for? by madprof · · Score: 1

      They are renaming it.
      The game's title now begins "We've been waiting for.."

    5. Re:what is there to live for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing. You may kill yourself now.

    6. Re:what is there to live for? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      first matrix, then lord of the rings, and now the last anticipated star wars release? what else is there?

      Harry Potter? Spider-Man? Shrek?

    7. Re:what is there to live for? by nizo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't forget The Hobbit (hopefully sometime in 2006 I think?)
      I can't wait until Hollwood destroys the rest of my childhood memories (Gilligans Island, Lone Ranger, etc). Sooner or later it is bound to happen :-(

    8. Re:what is there to live for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot x-men :x

    9. Re:what is there to live for? by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      Gigli II: Latina's Revenge...

    10. Re:what is there to live for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh I'm a geek... Ghost in the Shell: Innocence and the new Appleseed

    11. Re:what is there to live for? by Scodiddly · · Score: 2, Funny

      The next "Underworld" movie, silly.

    12. Re:what is there to live for? by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna go for sex. The answer is sex.

      Slashdot = Nerds;
      You = Nerds;
      Nerds = Don't get sex;

      --> You = Don't get sex QED

      At least Jar Jar can say he is a movie star.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    13. Re:what is there to live for? by nuclear305 · · Score: 1

      Clearly you are new here...

    14. Re:what is there to live for? by ryen · · Score: 1

      sure, as long as Lucas doesn't get his hands on it.
      sorry, had to say it.

    15. Re:what is there to live for? by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is going to be biased of course, but as far as sequels go, I think the ones that might actually be worth watching will be:

      Spider-Man 2
      X-men 3 (2 was even better than 1, so 3 should be unbelievable)
      The Hobbit

      And that's about it. All the other large franchises are either played out, or got so horrible that hopefully they won't bother to make any more sequels. Terminator 3 was pretty lame, and pretty much wrapped up the storyline anyway. The last two "Alien" movies were terrible. We all know how rancid Star Wars episodes 1 and 2 were. Star Trek has become rather tired, and has had a pretty bad track record (2, 4, 6, and 8 were great, but the rest were either mediocre or terrible). Matrix went way south with the last two installments, and its storyline seems to be wrapped up as well (I hope). Maybe the next James Bond movie will be good, but it's impossible to say since they'll be starting over with a new actor.

      Luckily, good new non-blockbuster, non-sequel-generating movies come out now and then, such as Master and Commander.

    16. Re:what is there to live for? by gangien · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Pardon my swearing, but just how the fuck can you destroy Gilligan's Island?????

    17. Re:what is there to live for? by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      You'll be living forever waiting for it then, I wager.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    18. Re:what is there to live for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention kill bill

    19. Re:what is there to live for? by .killedkenny · · Score: 1
      Luckily, good new non-blockbuster, non-sequel-generating movies come out now and then, such as Master and Commander.

      You're kidding, right? Master and Commander is a series of 20 books. Get ready for a new M&C film every 2 or 3 years for the rest of your life...

    20. Re:what is there to live for? by xTown · · Score: 2, Informative

      One down, one to go; you obviously missed The Legend of the Lone Ranger starring the horrible Klinton Spillsbury.

      Hey, if they made Steve Buscemi Gilligan, it might not be so...well, yeah, it would still be bad.

    21. Re:what is there to live for? by Observador · · Score: 1

      Casshern (aka: Casshan Robot Hunter)

      Trailer Here (Warning: Japanese Page and Quicktime Format) DVD of Original Anime Series Here
      --
      I wish I could filter out the annoying Pickens articles...
    22. Re:what is there to live for? by eclectro · · Score: 1
      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    23. Re:what is there to live for? by DreamerFi · · Score: 4, Funny

      The answer is sex.

      No, no, the answer is not sex, the question is sex. The answer is yes.

      -John

    24. Re:what is there to live for? by chx1975 · · Score: 1
    25. Re:what is there to live for? by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      Indiana Jones 4, Jaws VI, Friday 13th part 13, CaddyshackIII? I could go on......no?

    26. Re:what is there to live for? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Luckily, good new non-blockbuster, non-sequel-generating movies come out now and then, such as Master and Commander

      I guess you are not aware then that Master and Commander is the first in a series of twenty, yes twenty books.


      -Colin

    27. Re:what is there to live for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a problem with society?

    28. Re:what is there to live for? by pknoll · · Score: 1

      Technically, "The Hobbit" is a prequel.

  20. If a dud is released on Memorial Day... by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1

    Does anyone still care?

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  21. In line for tickets? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

    Given the steady decline in enthusiasm for these films, I would imagine you could line up on May 19 2005 and have no issues getting a prime seat, should you actually care to.

    Of course, that won't stop the few remaining devout fans queueing up for days in advance. Of course, a permanent queue of 10 people does look a little strange, but then, I'm pretty sure the people queueing will look strange enough to begin with...

    Jedidiah.

    1. Re:In line for tickets? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Actually, there was a skanky movie theater in my town where I walked up to get tickets for Episode I on opening day. When a theater is so bad that they can't even sell out for Episode I, back when there was still hope, you know it's not going to last much longer. Unfortunately, they've knocked down that theater and replaced it with a much more reputable hardware store.

  22. The title by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The title of the movie has yet to be released

    Based on the last 2 titles, my guess would be Night of the Living Sith

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:The title by bob_jordan · · Score: 1

      I still say the last one should have been,

      Star Wars: When Clones Attack

      Bob.

    2. Re:The title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars Episode III: Guys With Neat-o Lasers!

    3. Re:The title by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit partial to Star Wars: Suffering Leads to Sequels, as suggested by The Brunching Shuttlecocks, but in absence of that (and Star Wars: An Old Hope), I thought

      Star Wars: Beating a Dead Tauntaun

      might be ok.

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    4. Re:The title by macmastery · · Score: 1

      You fools! It's Christmas Tauntauns. That's a link to the Trailer, people!

  23. Spoiler by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1

    There is an amazing, difficult battle where the Jedi are decimated, including Windu. But in an stunning display of the force, the lightsabers of the fallen jedi rise up and continue the fight, brutally wiping out the remaining enemies. The battle ends with a single survivor... Yoda.

    PS: the above is not real. I just thought it was a logical use of the force that would make Yoda appear to be a badass. :)

    1. Re:Spoiler by krumms · · Score: 1

      I just thought it was a logical use of the force that would make Yoda appear to be a badass.

      Gee I wish Yoda and Anakin could have traded places.

      *fanfare, enter waddling midget in a black suit & face mask, supported by a walking cane*

      Yoda: Your father I am, Luke.

      Luke: Noooooooo

      Yoda: Yeeeeesss

      Luke: Noooooooo

      Yoda chops off Luke's hand

      Luke: Nooooooooo

      Leia: Hey Lukey, want to get kinky?

      Luke: Nooooooooo

      Leia: Fine. Just because I'm your fucking sister.

      Yoda: *raspy laugh* Oh, oh, a pun you make, princess of bun features.

      Leia: What? Oh! "Fucking" sister! hahaha!

      Luke: Noooooooooo

      Yoda: Underestimate the power of the dark side, you should not.

      Luke: ... ?

      Yoda: ... more appropriate at the time, it did seem.

      *this continues for a while until music breaks in with MC Hammer's "Can't Touch This" and the Vader-Yoda performs all hella crazy funk moves, bouncing off walls and shit.*

  24. Title by Rotting · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps he could just call the new movie:

    Episode III: CGI

    1. Re:Title by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      More like Episode III: The Oversaturated Matte Painting.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    2. Re:Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like Episode III: The Oversaturated Matte Painting.

      No. Episode III: I'd rather have Natilie Portman and some hot grits.

      --wait mods, I'm ontopic.

    3. Re:Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see how the Common Gateway Interface has anything to do with StarWars. Maybe you're thinking of the MMORPG version?

      *wink*

    4. Re:Title by Rotting · · Score: 1

      even

      Episode III: Toy Story ...would do

  25. No surprise by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmm... Let's see.
    Episodes IV, V, and VI were released at three year intervals in May. Episode I released May 1999... Episode II released May 2002. Is anyone surprised that Episode III is being released May 2005?

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    1. Re:No surprise by moltar77 · · Score: 1

      I think people are just saddened that it will be so soon. "I know it's gonna suck.... but I... can't resist..!!"

    2. Re:No surprise by goates · · Score: 1

      Was I surprised, no. Had I forgotten about this movie after the LotR series, yes.

      goates

    3. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, not surprised by the day either, since that's been the same too IIRC.

  26. Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by rizzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hopefully this can enter the front-running for the title of Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever. Matrix Revolutions recently took it from The Godfather Part 3.

    Although Revenge of the Nerds 3 was pretty bad.

    --

    "More organs means more human." - Zim

    1. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by ElectricPoppy · · Score: 1

      Godfather 3 was sublime. A beautful film.
      Matrix Revolutions was awe-inspiring.
      Revenge of the Nerds 3 did suck.
      2/3 - that's why I don't come here for movie reviews.

    2. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      No way. Picture Agent Smith saying "Everytime I try and get out... they keep pullin me back in!", then having the final shot of Matrix be of Agent Smith dying of old age in a chair. Then, only then, could it be worse.

    3. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by WolF-g · · Score: 1

      Try...

      Highlander 3 (or the other Highlander 3)
      ...or, even worse...
      Best of the Best 3

      Damn those sucked.

    4. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by Golias · · Score: 1
      Godfather 3 was good. Watch the director's cut, and discover for yourself.

      Matrix Revolutions took the crown from Alien^3

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by adzoox · · Score: 1

      don't forget Alien 3 and Robocop 3 ...

      I say this will be the best movie of the 6 - I think Lucas has finally listened to the fan base and say the profits dwindle movie by movie

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    6. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first "Best of the Best" is the only one worth remembering.

    7. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by rizzo · · Score: 1

      Godfather 3 was sublime. A beautful film.

      Compared to the first two films it was pretty lame. Sophia Coppola is not a good actress. The scene of the cardinal being thrown from the staircase was good though.

      Matrix Revolutions was awe-inspiring.

      Eh? EH?!?!?! What is your definition of "awe"? If you mean a feeling of wanting to vomit at the end with the sun-shiney day and rainbow then yes, I was ready to "awe" all over the place. I'm surprised they didn't go the whole nine yards and have some cartoon bunnies and flowers sprouting out of the ground in some Roger Rabbit-esque finale.

      Now that I think about it I don't like Return of the Jedi that much either, but it's still better than SW Ep I or II.

      Jaws 3 sucked as well. Man I should write a book on this.

      --

      "More organs means more human." - Zim

    8. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How dare you snub the venerable Police Academy saga.

    9. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Police Academy didn't get truly stupid until 5. Well, stupid enough to be completely unwatchable, at least.

      Bobcat Goldthwait saved the third and fourth ones. The sound effects guy wore out his welcome by the second.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    10. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hihglander 3 was great compared to teh suckfest that was Highlander 2: the Quickening

    11. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you shouldn't.

    12. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by DragonMagic · · Score: 1

      Halloween 3, The Howling 3, Police Academy 3, The Skulls 3...

      --

      Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
    13. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      Endgame was much better than "The Final Dimention", as, so far, it is "Endgame" and, best of all, Chris Lambert (or at least his character) dies!

      What's really pathetic with the movies though is the best quicking explosion of the whole series is at the beginning of 2, with the other one being at the end of 1. Shouldn't they have kept going to one-up themselves with the quickening explosions or something?

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    14. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that.

    15. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "Matrix Revolutions was awe-inspiring."

      Barkeep, I'll have 10 of whatever he's having!

      Revolutions sucked ass. I hate myself for going to see it. The Matrix (the first movie) is forever ruined for me. Argh!

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    16. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by rainman_bc · · Score: 0

      What about Police Academy III?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    17. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's like people kept telling me not to watch Highlander 2 because it would ruin the first Highlander forever for me. Unfortunately, I caught about 20-30 minutes of it on TV one day and even that small amount has ruined it forever for me.

    18. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by Mateito · · Score: 1

      > The Matrix (the first movie) is forever ruined
      for me.

      I thought so too after sitting through 2 and 3, but then a friend lent me the first and only Matrix on DVD, and I remembered how good it really was.

      After watching the bonus stuff, I have a new respect for Keanu. Not as an actor, but as a person. He really got off on the doing the movie... it was something almost spiritual for him.

      On the other hand, Trinity is a whiney bitch who couldnt get over that she didnt deserve the biggest trailer on the block.

    19. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by macmastery · · Score: 1

      You forgot:
      Police Academy 3
      Weekend at Bernie's 3
      Deadly Friend 3
      Love is all there is 3

    20. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you already mentioned all that above. Repeating it isn't going to make it true.

  27. That's convenient... by mcc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    May 2005. Anyone else notice that that's about the middle of the indeterminate area that the PS3, GC2 and XBox2 are currently likely to be launched?

    O Lucasarts give us this day our tie-ins, we are ready to recieve... -_-

    1. Re:That's convenient... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good grief... who would make that connection?

      That big yellow thing outside is the "sun"

    2. Re:That's convenient... by NanoGator · · Score: 0

      "May 2005. Anyone else notice that that's about the middle of the indeterminate area that the PS3, GC2 and XBox2 are currently likely to be launched?"

      Somehow I doubt the tie-ins are going to be anything like the 300 million dollars they're going to rake on on May 21st.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:That's convenient... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      nice catch.

    4. Re:That's convenient... by dummondwhu · · Score: 1

      Easy on the paranoia....the approximate release time frame for Episodes I-III has been known for years, since before Episode I.

  28. geeks leaving the house by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

    hookedup, looks like you'll need to leave in a little over a year ...

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:geeks leaving the house by maxbang · · Score: 1

      Triumph, please show up at the line again next year with your faux Vulcan. This time we'll be wise to your riddles and tricks! You can again have a mind battle with that wierd black elf dude with his filet-o-fish sandwich.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
  29. You can say that again. by PlatinumInitiate · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Anakin to Padme: "I don't like sand. It's rough. Not soft and smooth like you."

    Some of the dialogue in Episode II was cringe-inducing. I feel the special effects were actually underrated, though. For example, people gasped in awe at the opening scene in TTT, (Gandalf diving down under the bridge in Moria after the Balrog), but few realize (or will admit) that those effects were essentially copied from the scene in AOTC where Anakin dives from his speeder.

    Ideally, Lucas should aim for both good effects (at which, IMO, he has been fairly consistent), and good direction and dialogue (a bit lacking in AOTC).

    1. Re:You can say that again. by nebaz · · Score: 5, Informative

      For example, people gasped in awe at the opening scene in TTT, (Gandalf diving down under the bridge in Moria after the Balrog), but few realize (or will admit) that those effects were essentially copied from the scene in AOTC where Anakin dives from his speeder

      Try The 5th Element , taxi scenes. Visual effects for falling/fighting are nothing new.

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    2. Re:You can say that again. by PlatinumInitiate · · Score: 1

      Try The 5th Element , taxi scenes. Visual effects for falling/fighting are nothing new.

      This is true enough, although the similarities between the specific scenes I mentioned in AOTC and TTT are very difficult to ignore.

    3. Re:You can say that again. by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The star wars universe is black and white. The plot of all movies is simple and straightforward. The dialogue is simplistic and easy to follow.

      The movies, although I enjoyed them, have never been a pinnacle example of filmmaking. They're just a fun way to waste a couple hours.

      When I was a kid I couldnt wait to see Empire or Jedi. And it wasnt for the brilliant dialogue, I wanted to see some cool space dogfights, neato lightsaber battles, and weirdo looking robots and aliens.

      I wasn't as dissapointed in Eps 1 & 2 as the rest of you. I only showed up for the effects, and shut my brain off to watch 'em. Yoda going all Wu-Tang at the end of Ep 2 was cool.

      The only character I ever thought was cool was Boba Fett, so I guess I'm a little miffed that they rewrote him as a hot-headed latino with a chip on his shoulder. I liked the mysterious, soulless, motivated-by-cold-hard-cash bounty hunter, myself.

      Anyhow, there'll be a ton of cool fights in the next one. The Jedi get their asses kicked and Anakin gets knocked into some acid/lava/wookie urine..

      I'll watch it, and enjoy it for what it is.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:You can say that again. by tmhsiao · · Score: 1
      Anakin to Padme: "I don't like sand. It's rough. Not soft and smooth like you."

      Oh come on... Compare that line to the dialogue from two critically acclaimed movies:
      "Sand is overrated. It's just tiny rocks."
      --Joel, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

      Or

      "When there was no meat, we ate fowl. When there was no fowl, we ate crawdad. When there was no crawdad to be found, we ate sand"
      "You ate what??"
      "We ate sand."
      "You ate sand??"
      "That's right."
      -- H.I. and a chatty cellmate, Raising Arizona


      Actually, you're right. Neither of those movies had someone riding on big turd-cows.
      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    5. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the FUCK are you on about? TTT was filmed BEFORE AOTC! They filmed the ENTIRE trilogy in one go, remember? The release date of TTT has nothing to do with anything. What A TOOL!

    6. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      The only character I ever thought was cool was Boba Fett, so I guess I'm a little miffed that they rewrote him as a hot-headed latino with a chip on his shoulder.

      Um. You stupid ignorant dumb fucking cunt. The actor was Maori, not Latino.

    7. Re:You can say that again. by PlatinumInitiate · · Score: 1

      What the FUCK are you on about? TTT was filmed BEFORE AOTC! They filmed the ENTIRE trilogy in one go, remember? The release date of TTT has nothing to do with anything. What A TOOL!

      You do realize that only the principal filming was done? The effects and post-production were done after that. Peter Jackson even stated that this approach was adopted specifically to take advantage of of new technologies and methods, and to polish existing material and add new material. TTT was released in Decemeber 2002, AOTC in May 2002.

    8. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah cause the majority of that scene was filmed. Riiiight. Perhaps you know the exact time and place that it was rendered? Huh? Let us know when you figure that out, tough guy.

    9. Re:You can say that again. by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think the worst offender was yoda, "Only a Jedi could have erased those files." I really don't know where to begin with whats wrong with that sentence.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    10. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true enough, although the similarities between the specific scenes I mentioned in AOTC and TTT are very difficult to ignore.

      Uh, you didn't mention any similarities other than that they both involve falling. If that's the standard for "ripping off," then I shudder for the future of copyright.

    11. Re:You can say that again. by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me but I don't have any problem ignoring the similarities.

      That's no doubt because one appeared in a movie that was very good and the other appeared in AOTC.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    12. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You do realize that only the principal filming was done? The effects and post-production were done after that. Peter Jackson even stated that this approach was adopted specifically to take advantage of of new technologies and methods, and to polish existing material and add new material. TTT was released in Decemeber 2002, AOTC in May 2002.

      That doesn't really change his point. They were probably working on producing this shot when AOTC was released, and previsualization was going on much, much earlier still. In one of the TTT commentaries, Jackson notes that he had wanted to do this scene from the very beginning, and that it was originally going to be a much more elaborate scene with Gandalf and the Balrog fighting in the water and up the stairs.

    13. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh well you see HFS+++++++++ supports Force-based security descriptors. So only those trained with Force Authenicate can access those protected areas in the Jedi RAID array. Didn't you listen to the director's commentary on the DVD?!?

    14. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try Rear Window.

    15. Re:You can say that again. by nizo · · Score: 1

      I really feel for his wife, I mean can you *IMAGINE* being married to someone who wrote the lamest love story ever??? I told friends that watching the "love story scenes" was much like pouring salt on a really bad case of road rash for twenty minutes.

    16. Re:You can say that again. by Quarters · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Lucas invented falling.

    17. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

      wish i had mod points.

    18. Re:You can say that again. by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I find them difficult to see. They both involved falling very far. What else?

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    19. Re:You can say that again. by jdbo · · Score: 1

      People gasped in awe because they had emotional investment in his character, who appeared to -die- in the previous film, an appearance which was then turned inside out by converting Gandalf's passive sacrifice for his companions into an active, all-out battle - the sequence takes 60 seconds, tops. This is a case of special effects being used to support smart, concise storytelling.

      While I enjoy the AOTC speeder bit, it's a section of an overlong sequence with a single point (Anakin's recklessness and disobedience to Obi Wan); furthermore, the audience knows that Anakin is doing the Jedi equivalent of a Tony Hawk skateboarding stunt, so there's not really much concern built up for Anakin, let alone Obi Wan.

      Anyway, my main point is that effects are not the point, its the story told with them.

    20. Re:You can say that again. by Maserati · · Score: 1

      As an experiment, try watching AOTC without the whole "frolicking" scene. The movie as a whole improves remarkably without it, even the rest of the poorly directed (Hayden Chistensen is a better actor than that - which is saying exactly as much as you think it is) Anakin/Padme scenes are tolerable with one of the worst scenes in science fiction history cut out.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    21. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, people gasped in awe at the opening scene in TTT, (Gandalf diving down under the bridge in Moria after the Balrog), but few realize (or will admit) that those effects were essentially copied from the scene in AOTC where Anakin dives from his speeder.

      On the other hand, the whole Star Wars Travesty/Trilogy was clearly lifted from The Lord of the Rings virtually wholesale.

      (A "Dark Lord" trying to dominate the region. A small, fairly insignificant person who is 'bound' to the dark lord and becomes a hero by seeing to it that something is plunged into the heart of the dark lord's domain. A group of friends who follow each other around, split up, get back together, etc etc. An old wizard type guy who advises the insignificant but still heroic guy as well as others. I can go on and on. I, mean, for chrissakes, the last film was called Return of the Jedi!!! Nooooo...doesn't sound like anything that came before.)

      Lucas is just lucky you can't copyright an idea or he would have been stuck making THX sequels forever...or something.

      *sigh* I'll probably be modded troll. I wonder if I'll be turned to stone at sunrise?

    22. Re:You can say that again. by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      But they're hard as fuck to produce...

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    23. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I feel the special effects were actually underrated, though. For example, people gasped in awe at the opening scene in TTT, (Gandalf diving down under the bridge in Moria after the Balrog), but few realize (or will admit) that those effects were essentially copied from the scene in AOTC where Anakin dives from his speeder.

      People were gasping because it was motherfucking Gandalf fighting a balrog!

    24. Re:You can say that again. by modecx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, it's not that the graphics weren't great. It's that the graphics were used in place of story line.

      In TTT, Gandolf has good reason for falling down the chasm--afterall, it wasn't even his choice! I'm sure that he'd rather be doing other things.

      Anakin diving off the speeder was just stupid. He did it with no clear reason for doing it, in the face of the great possibility he would become jedi-jelly. He used the special effect as a motivator in the movie, in place of inteligence. Futhermore, it was done with absolutely no suspense. We know he (Anakin) isn't going to die; Gandolf, on the other hand had the people that never read the book fooled--last thing they were expecting to see was Gandolf fighting and falling!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    25. Re:You can say that again. by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

      But...but...then I can't mock the turd-cows!

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    26. Re:You can say that again. by gamgee5273 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Ummm... Lucas's wife left him during the original trilogy and he and she had it out, almost bloody, in the courts for custody of their daughters (he later adopted his son).

      He won and raised all three kids as a single father. Granted, a single father with a HELL of a lot of money, but a single father all the same... and one who packed lunches and cooked family dinners.

      The guy might have sucked at telling a love story, but I have no doubt he actually loves his kids. I just think a love story didn't play correctly for him as he was writing it...

      Of course, in the love story he wrote, the mother dies young, the kids are split apart, the father cuts off the son's hand and the son and daughter have romantic moments together.

      Ewwwwww.

    27. Re:You can say that again. by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Or Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey (for the falling effects).

      Chris

    28. Re:You can say that again. by fpp · · Score: 1

      You almost got it. Marcia and George divorced in '83, when Amy (the oldest of his daughters) was just a toddler (Lucas had to sell Pixar to Steve Jobs to get divorce money, which is too bad. He could have controlled that company, too). His second daughter, Katie, was born in the late 80's, I believe, and was also adopted.

      I've heard from numerous sources that Marcia was the one person who George would actually listen to, and helped to greatly improve some aspects of the original trilogy, as well as "Raiders".

      This is the one thing that George needs right now; a woman to advise him on the romantic aspects of the new films.

    29. Re:You can say that again. by Bilange · · Score: 1

      people gasped in awe at the opening scene in TTT, but few realize (or will admit) that those effects were essentially copied from the scene in AOTC where Anakin dives from his speeder.

      Then Lucas can copy (still has some time to put it in Ep. 3) on LOTR too. Id like to see Yoda saying "Not pass, you shall!!"

      --
      "...a generation of kids has grown up thinking Trance is the shittiest music since country and western." - Paul van Dyk
    30. Re:You can say that again. by quantaman · · Score: 1

      (Gandalf diving down under the bridge in Moria after the Balrog), but few realize (or will admit) that those effects were essentially copied from the scene in AOTC where Anakin dives from his speeder


      That force fight between Yoda and Count Dooku in AOTC was Lucas's version of the wizards duel in LOTR, after he saw the duel he apparently decided he wanted to do the same thing with Lee in AOTC.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    31. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Boba's the fucking kid in Ep II

    32. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best. Post. Ever! Oh for some mod points! thanks for making my day =]

    33. Re:You can say that again. by Joey7F · · Score: 2, Informative

      That "Latino" is actually a Maori native of New Zealand.

      --Joey

    34. Re:You can say that again. by antic · · Score: 1

      So witty that you had to share it with us too, huh? ;)

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    35. Re:You can say that again. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Ah. So it would have been better for Jackson to NOT do Gandalf and the Balrog falling through the mountain, as described in Tolkien, because some idiot might think he was copying Lucas?

      Come on.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    36. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people gasped in awe at the opening scene in TTT

      You watch movies with some fucking morons, I presume?

    37. Re:You can say that again. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      nothing, especially when in lotr the falling doesn't involve any dodging at all or similarities like that(5th element's falling scene however does include falling).

      all in all actually 5th element is the same kind of nonsense futuristic cgi fighting like the new star wars flics are, though 5th element doesn't suck and is actually enjoyable(mostly due to the good flow of things).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    38. Re:You can say that again. by leereyno · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an episode of Jerry Springer to me.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    39. Re:You can say that again. by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      I was hoping that Annie wouldn't be able to land safely. Lots of splatter would have been greatly appriciated.

    40. Re:You can say that again. by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Why aren't people on Slashdot bagging Jackson for ripping off the 5th Element in TTT, but they are bagging Lucas for exactly the same thing with AOTC?

      Don't bother explaining. Just think about ways to reduce carrying double standards around.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    41. Re:You can say that again. by obeythefist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And you say this because why? You're personal best friends with both Peter Jackson and George Lucas?

      If you think and use historical frames of reference (hard to do for some I know), you'd know that Lucas has been very busily ripping off Samurai films whenever he can. The Yoda fight was an extension of that (bear with me) in that he wanted to show the old master teaching the rebelling student a lesson. That was the crux of the fight. It had *absolutely* nothing to do with Tolkein.

      Think before you post. With your brain.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    42. Re:You can say that again. by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Yet he's still more convincing than Anakin in Episode 1.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    43. Re:You can say that again. by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to have actually watched any of the Star Wars movies. Let me fill in some of the blanks for you.

      The Force grants the wielder precognition. ("He sees things before they happen"). It controls their actions (But it also obeys their commands.)

      Anakin may not have even had a choice in what he was doing. If he did, he did so knowing there was almost no risk to himself.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    44. Re:You can say that again. by dunham · · Score: 1
      FWIW, the commentary on TTT says that the falling scene was inspired by some artwork. (I forget the author's name.)

      I will admit that I like EP1 and EP2, for mindless entertainment, special effects, and backstory. I guess EP4 probably best captures what Lucas' stated goal: make a movie that captures the spirit of cheesy 50's sci fi shows. But, then, Flash Gordon does a better job of that. :)

    45. Re:You can say that again. by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      Think before you post. With your brain.

      Perhaps you should. That was sarcasm.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    46. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn if I had some mutherfucking mod points I'd mod you up like a motherfucker.

    47. Re:You can say that again. by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      As an experiment, try watching AOTC without the whole "frolicking" scene.

      Throw in the Factory romp to the dump list and you got your self a pretty OK movie! I most certainly agree, though. When I watch it, I track past those scenes (namely the turd cow scenes). SO damn boring, they are.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    48. Re:You can say that again. by thryllkill · · Score: 1

      Could have somthing to do with the fact that it was the JEDI library that they were erased from. Maybe non-jedi aren't allowed to go to that library, and since it is run by jedi they would know if an outside force tried to erase or access the files.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    49. Re:You can say that again. by Maserati · · Score: 1

      The factory wasn't terriblly boring, I actually kinda enjoyed it in a goofy sense. A flying R2 is, however, going too far.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    50. Re:You can say that again. by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      Fifth Element ripped of Fritz Lang's Metropolis. And you could definately go farther back than that if you started including literature.

      I was going to explain, but then, I thought, "why bother"? Star Wars is dreadful, 'nuff said.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    51. Re:You can say that again. by superhoe · · Score: 1

      Umm.. you mean the FAT file system is really a Jedi, or what?

      --

      -el

    52. Re:You can say that again. by RexxFiend · · Score: 1

      I think you might be missing the point of the two scenes: the fighting the balrog right at the start of TTT was crucial to the plot since before then we thought Gandalf had fallen to his death and here we find out that he hasn`t, and is in fact kicking seven bells out of the big nasty balrog dude. The wow factor was in the story moving on and how powerful gandalf really was.
      The scene where anakin dives from the speeder had absolutely no point to it whatsoever, in fact that whole 10 minute scene with the chase through coruscant was a completely pointless cgi wankfest with the sole purpose of allowing abi wan to use the "prescient" that boy will be the death of me gag.

      Just an opinion mind... ;-)

      --

      A crash reduces
      Your expensive computer
      to a simple stone.
    53. Re:You can say that again. by NiteHaqr · · Score: 1

      Your right

      It should have been

      "Those files, erased by a Jedi they only could be" :P

    54. Re:You can say that again. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Forget it, he's rolling.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    55. Re:You can say that again. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      >Yeah, Lucas invented falling.

      No, he merchandised falling.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    56. Re:You can say that again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I aims ta please.

    57. Re:You can say that again. by Tassach · · Score: 1
      5th element worked because it didn't try and take itself seriously -- it was obviously and intentionally campy, like the 60's Batman series.

      The Star Wars prequels are unintentionally campy parodies of the originals that try and take themselves seriously, and don't work as a result.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    58. Re:You can say that again. by Squozen · · Score: 1

      How the hell is LotR ripping off 5th Element? The scene was described in a book written half a century ago, and I think I missed the part with the skyscrapers and flying cars.

  30. Get in line NOW by Sailsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When will they post which theatres will be having midnight showings? Or will there be a special early screening in select cities? I need to which theatre to go to so I can be the first one in line. That way I can be that crazy fan shown on national TV. Who cares if I have to quit my job, drop out of school, etc. Star Wars is worth it.

    1. Re:Get in line NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Star Wars is worth it.

      I'm guessing you were so exhausted from the wait the first two times that you didn't actually watch the movies...

    2. Re:Get in line NOW by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "That way I can be that crazy fan shown on national TV. Who cares if I have to quit my job, drop out of school, etc. Star Wars is worth it."

      Boy I'd like to know how these people keep reproducing.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Get in line NOW by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      Boy I'd like to know how these people keep reproducing.

      And I'd like to know as little as possible, thank you.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  31. Why should I see it? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 3, Funny

    'It'll be goooood...'

    How good?

    'More better than you can imagine!'

    I dunno, I can imagine quite a lot...

    'You'll see it!'

    I better.

    'You will!'

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  32. In other news... by SageMadHatter · · Score: 1

    Star Wars fans may want to watch the second half of the Star Wars: Clone Wars cartoon mini series, on the Cartoon Network this Friday the 6th, at 8pm and 9pm. As it bridges the story between movies Episode II and Episode III. That and we get to see the fall of the Jedi order.

    Mad Hatter

    1. Re:In other news... by jo42 · · Score: 1


      Except those are probably some of the worst cartoons on TV...

  33. Episode II on DVD by lazuli42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This reminds me of last winter when Episode II came out on DVD.

    I was at my local Walmart store when I stumbled across the island display offering Star Wars Episode II for some rediculously low price. I think it was $9.99.

    "Wow," I thought, "That's really cheap! I should pick up a copy!" I greedily snatched up one of the widescreen packages.

    But then I remembered that Episode II really really sucked. I put the package down.

    But it was only $9.99! Even if it sucked, what a bargain!

    But then again, the movie really did suck. Completely. In fact I could easily rant for an hour about how badly the movie sucked. I mean, don't get me started on Jango Fett, the apparently psychic bounty hunter. Or the totally clueless Jedi. Or Count Doogie. Arghh.... I digress.

    Anyway, I decided not to waste $9.99 on the DVD. Unless the reviews for Episode III are really stellar, I'll save my $7.50 and skip that movie too.

    --

    "There's companies that are just so cool that you just can't even deal with it," - Bill Gates, about Google

    1. Re:Episode II on DVD by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Episode II really really sucked

      No no... you got it backwards. It's Episode I that really really sucked. Episode II just really sucked.

      If we're lucky, Episode III will just suck.

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    2. Re:Episode II on DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Just get yourself a decent Usenet binary downloader and download it from alt.binaries.vcd when it's out in theaters. Problem solved! You still get to see it and you don't have to give your money to either George Lucas or the MPAA.

    3. Re:Episode II on DVD by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 3, Funny

      Since I managed to totally forget to see The Matrix III (Rebooted? Restitutions? something like that), I doubt I'll bother watching Star Wars III. God what dissapointments these movies have been. :(

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    4. Re:Episode II on DVD by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Well, uh, the aliens on Camino were pretty cool-lookin', and it was fun (though silly) to see Yoda open a keg of whoop-ass on Dooku.

      Other than that, not worth the price of the free parking.

      At least Ep I had that awesome lightsabre battle at the end. Now _that_ was worth the money.

      The Star Wars pod racing game at the arcade is okay, but now that I've come in first on expert level (not that hard), what's left for me? *sniff*

    5. Re:Episode II on DVD by jcoleman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Insightful? Are you fucking kidding me?

    6. Re:Episode II on DVD by lazuli42 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I didn't rate it that way. :)

      Moderation on slashdot is kind of a crapshoot.

      --

      "There's companies that are just so cool that you just can't even deal with it," - Bill Gates, about Google

    7. Re:Episode II on DVD by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Count "Doogie" : not be decided with by our skills with the force... but by our skill with a scalpel!

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  34. Darth Vader by qualico · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Wonder what an older version of the Darth Vader uniform will look like?

    1. Re:Darth Vader by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      Lucas is short on cash this time. He's going to borrow one of the old Cylon costumes from the original Battlestar Galactica series for Vader's first outfit.

      Actually, Ralph McQuarrie, who did most of the conceptual art for Lucas in the 70's, which ended up being storyboarded, had a early Vader outfit. It was a very cool painting. Black cape and chest panel, but the helmet looked very gothic and more skull like.

    2. Re:Darth Vader by qualico · · Score: 1

      That would be a nice picture. It must be on the web somewhere. Time to Google.

  35. The real title by nightsweat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Star Wars: Episode III: A Big Pile of Sith

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:The real title by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Star Wars: Episode III: A Big Pile of Sith

      At least that's what dyslexic people will call it ...

      Cheers,
      IT

      --

      Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

    2. Re:The real title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for pointing out the blatantly obvious implication that the grandparent was going for.

    3. Re:The real title by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Yup, we already had the Big Pile of Dead Jedi.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:The real title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Thanks for identifying the crux of the joke as if it were a completely new and different joke. I never would have gotten the original without your help.

  36. Oh, god no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One was bad, two insulted my intelligence (and I only rented two). Three. Yeah, right. I won't waste my time.

    1. Re:Oh, god no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I thought part II was pretty good. Part one did suck, but part II was a fun average movie.

  37. MOD parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 racist flamebait

  38. The Creeping Fear by grafikhugh · · Score: 5, Informative

    Aint it cool news reported the title was going to be The Creeping Fear. It isn't fact yet but its from a trusted source. Here is the original story AICN

    --
    The Surgeon General says sigs are bad for me.
    1. Re:The Creeping Fear by crow · · Score: 1

      That name is dangerously similar to The Creeping Terror. This is probably the worst movie ever, and it wasn't helped by the soundtrack being destroyed and replaced with a narrator.

    2. Re:The Creeping Fear by krumms · · Score: 1

      Aint it cool news reported the title was going to be The Creeping Fear.

      Vader: *creep creep* are you bound by fear yet?

      Jedi: Nup.

      Vader: *creep creep* now?

      Jedi: Hrm ... I feel something ... strange ...

      Vader: Yes??? A disturbance in the force maybe? A fearsome disturbance????

      Jedi: Hmm ... no, I just farted.

      Vader: You stinky bastard!

    3. Re:The Creeping Fear by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Nahhh. Mitchell was worse. I have that episode of MST3K by the way. I wondered why they had all that redundant narration during the movie. Now I know.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    4. Re:The Creeping Fear by Mateito · · Score: 1

      > Aint it cool news reported the title was going
      > to be The Creeping Fear.

      No.. you misheard.

      Its "The feeping queer".

      You know... that sounded a lot funnier before I typed it.

    5. Re:The Creeping Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Creeping Fear was an April fool's joke.

  39. I think I'll speak for everyone... by cjackson0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just like the Matrix: Revolutions, I'll try and keep my hopes as low as possible knowing that I will hate it, but I'll go and be disappointed anyway.

  40. Episode III: The Creeping Fear by OS24Ever · · Score: 2, Informative

    At least that is what it said earlier in the week on the Star Wars website when you hovered over the list of movies.

    Now it says in production.

    Barring an April Fools by the folks at Lucasfilm did someone goof?

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  41. Star Wars in a Nutshell by No_Weak_Heart · · Score: 1

    Basic summary of a Star Wars movie

    1. R2D2 will use at least one new accessory, to the delight of the audience;
    2. R2D2 will be seen in the background either ascending or descending a set of stairs; this will largely go unnoticed by the audience;
    3. One of the characters will fall into a very deep hole/shaft.

    Note that Episode II violated item number three, but this was largely offset by Ms Portman's presence.

    1. Re:Star Wars in a Nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would enjoy falling into Ms. Portman's hole with my shaft.

    2. Re:Star Wars in a Nutshell by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget: Someone will have a bad feeling about something.

  42. what was the rumored title again? by maxbang · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The Creeping Sense of Disappointment?

    Seriously, I can't wait. I'm dead serious - I'm too much of a fanatic to let petty things like plot and cool dialogue get in the way of a Star Wars movie. Come on! It's friggin Star Wars, man! Anything Star Wars related is cool, except for the books. Those are just plain stupid. Go ahead, mod me down, and I'll become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
  43. It has been foretold.. by kiwioddBall · · Score: 2, Funny

    With the name of episode IV being "A New Hope" it sounds like episode III is going to be really tragic mess. George Lucas already foretold it!!

  44. Special edition critics? by hellfire · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where do all the "HAN FIRES FIRST!" flame throwers go? Are we delegated to the side entrance or are you ignoring us? Don't make me start shooting green people just to get noticed!!!

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Special edition critics? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Hey, if that's what you have to do to get yourself (and thus "the cause") noticed then fire away.

      Just be sure you fire first.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:Special edition critics? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you'd start shooting first, eh? WHat would your hero Han say?

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:Special edition critics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yes, I bet you have"

      Yes, this bait go ahead and correct my quote

    4. Re:Special edition critics? by SiegeTank · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lucky we are talking about Star Wars here and not Star Trek, otherwise you would have to be asking how many green chicks you would have to sleep with to get noticed ;-)

    5. Re:Special edition critics? by nzgeek · · Score: 1

      Get in line behind the "ET special agents with walkie-talkies instead of guns" guys.

      Nothing to see here.

    6. Re:Special edition critics? by JVert · · Score: 1

      I tried to moderate you as -1 Terrorist but all I could see was -1 Hippy.

    7. Re:Special edition critics? by forlornhope · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lucky? Im sorry, but those green chicks were kind of hot. I would rather do green chicks than shoot green people.

      Oh Lord, I just resonded to a Star Wars/Trek post. I need to go wash myself and see if my girlfriend will still have me back.

      --
      "We Don't Need No Truthless Heros!" - Project 86
    8. Re:Special edition critics? by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Or worse, you could quote from Alien Resurrection and ask "Who do I have to fuck to get off this boat?"

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  45. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment...keep it going! by DocStoner · · Score: 1

    Jaws 3(D)
    Aliens 3 (as compared to the previous 2)
    Star Trek 3 (as compared to the previous 2)
    Terminator 3

  46. **SPOILER** by dioscaido · · Score: 1

    This movie is going to blow. Seriously.

    1. Re:**SPOILER** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd stand in line for that......

    2. Re:**SPOILER** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This movie is going to blow. Seriously.

      Take solace in the fact that my woman (and your mother) blows harder. :)

    3. Re:**SPOILER** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - expect to see people fall over en masse

      - expect to see the extinguishing of a fire

      - expect a lava scene (duh)

      spoiled enough yet?

  47. You underestimate the power by stecoop · · Score: 1

    Go look at his credits. He was involved with Howard the Duck and may we not (or !not) forget Star Wars Holiday Special - even he doesn't want any credit from that one.

    1. Re:You underestimate the power by AgentSmith1000 · · Score: 1
      Enough with pointing out the damn holiday special. I now declare these topics to be moot and finished!
      • --Star Wars Holiday Special
      • --Ewoks in Jedi
      • --Howard the Duck
      • --Jar Jar Binks/Jar Jar Stinks/etc.
      • --Special Edition rehash s**t
      • --Hitler ranting about anything (according to that damn meme law, even me mentioning Hitler makes this post unfunny
      • --The suckage factor of Episode I and II
      • --The soul draining disappointment of the Matrix trilogy (especially Revolutions or Rotations or whatevar the fuck it's called!)
      • --Hot Grits/down ones pants/ w Natalie Portman/etc.
      • --GNAA. You've had your fun.
      • --I for one welcome our new X overlords
      • --In Soviet Russia X happens to you
      • --Any variation of First Post (i.e. prost fist, frost pizz, fros piss, etc.)
      • --Naked and petrified Natalie Portman (betcha forgot about that!)
      • --Star Wars vs. Star Trek forever
      • --The Star Trek suck factor of Next Gen,DS9,Voyager,or Enterprise
      • --% You insensitive Clod! %
      • --Linux/Unix vs. Windows
      • --emacs vs. vi
      • --U R the lame/loser/etc.
      • --You have failed it. (even though some Anonymous Coward will declare this post has failed it.)
      • --RMS is a goat fucker
      • --SCO is stupid
      • --RIAA anything
      • --MPAA anything
      • --The unwashed masses beef with anime article postings
      • --Bitching about Jon Katz

      Dammit! Did I miss anything?
    2. Re:You underestimate the power by stecoop · · Score: 1

      -- Me Too
      -- THE LATEST VIRUS WARNING (yes in all caps)
      -- Just search on google for X

      Yeah I'm with ya - note taken.

  48. am I the only one... by Disc2 · · Score: 1

    ...hoping for a May the Fourth release? Oh dear, I can remember my dad using that joke, this must be bad.

  49. Re:Episode III: The Creeping Fear by Norin · · Score: 1

    It was an April Fools joke

  50. Re:9770 hours by Chicane-UK · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Well if its about 13 months away, then your maths is WAY off.

    Try about 113,880 hours :)

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  51. Has the line started yet? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    How many idiots are already camping out for THIS one? :P

    I bet they'll be really pissed if SW:Episode III is a turkey like I & II were because we already know what happens in IV, V, and VI.

    1. Re:Has the line started yet? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Campers are teh 5uck!

  52. Radioactive Panda by RickHunter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think this comic strip says all that needs to be said about the new Star Wars movies.

    In a very sarcastic manner, of course.

  53. Star Wars Kid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the Star Wars Kid will make it in this movie?

  54. RADICAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. If only by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 1

    If only Scifi hadn't cancelled Mystery Science Theater, perhaps Lucas would fear that one day his movie would be lampooned and spend more than 3 minutes crapping out the script.

  56. Episode III Title: The Passion of Jar Jar by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its just two hours of Jar Jar being beaten.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Episode III Title: The Passion of Jar Jar by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      Damn.. I'd pay $10 to see that.

    2. Re:Episode III Title: The Passion of Jar Jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now there's an image to bring a smile to one's face: Jar Jar Binks being flayed alive and then having nails driven through his hands and feet and a sword slashed across his stomach.

    3. Re:Episode III Title: The Passion of Jar Jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if thats the plot then i actually WILL go see it!

    4. Re:Episode III Title: The Passion of Jar Jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll camp out to see that. Is there a scene where Lucas gets nailed up next to him?

    5. Re:Episode III Title: The Passion of Jar Jar by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I'd pay to see _The Jar Jar Chainsaw Massacre_!

    6. Re:Episode III Title: The Passion of Jar Jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meesa has ta die for George Lucas' sins

    7. Re:Episode III Title: The Passion of Jar Jar by d474 · · Score: 1

      I honestly can't stop laughing. Amen to Jar Jar Superstar.

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    8. Re:Episode III Title: The Passion of Jar Jar by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      Just thought you should know about this: http://www.asciimation.co.nz/diejarjar.html. Besides that, the site has about half of Episode 4.

    9. Re:Episode III Title: The Passion of Jar Jar by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I HOPE you mean beaten as in "getting your face smashed in by a large person", rather than beaten as in the next installment in the "Handjob Hunnies" series.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  57. George's thought process by wiljefv · · Score: 5, Funny

    For Episodes IV, V, and VI.
    Phase I: Come up with sweet Star Wars idea.
    Phase II: Make sweet movies.
    Phase III: Profit.

    For Episodes I, II, III.
    Phase I: Continue with sweet idea.
    Phase II: ???
    Phase III: Profit.

    1. Re:George's thought process by AresTheImpaler · · Score: 1

      what??

      Phase I: Continue with sweet idea.

      I think it was more like:

      For Episodes IV, V, and VI.
      Phase I: Come up with sweet Star Wars idea.
      Phase II: Make sweet movies.
      Phase III: Profit.

      For Episodes I, II, III.
      Phase I: what sweet idea? I don't remember anything
      Phase II: ???
      Phase III: Profit.

    2. Re:George's thought process by Katieminna · · Score: 1

      How to make more money than God. First, create a trilogy that will make everyone think you are creative and interesting. Second, disappear for about ten years or so to make your new fans wonder when you will continue the stories Third, re-release the original trilogy in a raped and fabricated version to hype the new idea Fianlly, create another trilogy to serve as a predecessor to the original that will keep the techno-geeks guessing for years while still buying the DVD's

      --
      sleep easy, for tomorrow we take over the world...
  58. Title leaked by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Funny


    Espisode III: Return of the Profit

    1. Re:Title leaked by jbucher · · Score: 1

      You are confused. Thats the title of Mel Gibsons next movie.

  59. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment...keep it going! by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lord of the Rings 3

    I'm sorry, but that sappy bullshit at the end drove me insane. It was an hour of munchkins crying and hugging in slow motion.

    I just kept muttering to myself "Quit whining and just get on the fucking boat, I have to take a leak". ...

    Oh, and dont forget Halloween 3 - Season of the Witch. I still shake my head when it comes on AMC, what the fuck was that supposed to be?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  60. The Title: by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Toy Story 3

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  61. A New Hope? by ignipotentis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how many youngsters seeing the series starting at episode one will hear the title "A New Hope" for episode four and wonder if the new hope spoken of is for the story lines? Its kind of ironic...

    --
    Don't waste time... procrastinate now!
  62. Dumb Fucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boba Fett isn't a latino, hes a New Zealand native, you dumb fucker.

    Otherwise known as a "Maori" pronounced "Mow-ree"

    You god damn nigger lipped SOB

  63. Starwars Kid by LabRat007 · · Score: 1

    I hope to God that the Star Wars Kid will come back for one more performance!

    Swing that saber flabby!

    --
    "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
  64. How About by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    "The Passion of the Christ Part III -- Mormons"

    After the huge box office ratings of the first movie, you can pretty much guarantee at least a couple more sequels including a buddy flick with Chris Rock as the comic relief sidekick.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:How About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're ever in Salt Lake City, you can essentially get that on an enormous IMAX screen they have in Temple Square.

    2. Re:How About by beerits · · Score: 1

      ...a buddy flick with Chris Rock as the comic relief sidekick

      I'd love to see more about Rufus, the 13th apostle.

    3. Re:How About by mandolin · · Score: 1
      After the huge box office ratings of the ("The Passion of the Christ"), you can pretty much guarantee at least a couple more sequels including a buddy flick with Chris Rock as the comic relief sidekick.

      I think they called that Dogma.

    4. Re:How About by johnwroach · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I believe that would be the prequel to Dogma

  65. What I want to know is... by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

    will Ghyslain be in it?

  66. In other news... by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
    May 19th, 2005 is the new "end of world" date in Watchtower.

  67. A New Hype by avronius · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Although out of focus for the "actual movie", it's more in line with the way the "real" story plays out:

    - To The Well Again! -

    George Lucas has proven that, in the absence of a genuinely new idea, we (I include myself here) are happy to drink up an old story presented with improved special effects. Hell, we don't even need the marketing machine to tell us how thirsty we are...

    This is not the sig you're looking for.

  68. Re:9770 hours by FoogyFoo · · Score: 1

    Try about 113,880 hours

    Well, you can wait 13 years to see it if you want, the rest of us will see it in 13 months.

    1 year, 1 month, 13 days = 9792 hours
    13 years = 4748 days = 113,952 hours

  69. Why is there no Hans Solo character? by yoho_jones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1/2 of the originals weren't exclusivly about the Jedi. Why do the prequels have to be entirely about them? I'm hoping there is at least on space battle with some capital ships and the land battles have some dialog and not comedic one liners.

    1. Re:Why is there no Hans Solo character? by mobiux · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is the entire and I mean ENTIRE problem with Ep. I and II, everyone is seen as either pure good or pure evil.

      There is no one like Han, who is by nature a self serving man, but actually has a decent side to him.

      Makes it so you can actually like him.

      Obviously this type of person isn't something that Lucas agrees with, considering the chop job he did with the whole shooting first thing.

    2. Re:Why is there no Hans Solo character? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Lando. Billy Dee may have cheesed up the character, but he's even more "gray area" than Han.

    3. Re:Why is there no Hans Solo character? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like Anakin?

      You may not like him, but casting him as pure good (or pure evil) is...short-sighted.

    4. Re:Why is there no Hans Solo character? by 2Wrongs · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you can call Anakin either entirely good or evil in Episode II. He's obviously conflicted. Doesn't make me like him though.

    5. Re:Why is there no Hans Solo character? by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      I met Hans Solo once. At a conference in Norway. He was a UN weapons inspector.

    6. Re:Why is there no Hans Solo character? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      This is the entire and I mean ENTIRE problem with Ep. I and II, everyone is seen as either pure good or pure evil.

      I thought that return of the king (and lord of the rings in general) was pretty neat though. Unless you count Smeagol as not evil that is.

    7. Re:Why is there no Hans Solo character? by fermion · · Score: 1
      I think I have written this before to another comment about Han Solo.

      I think Star Wars is about the possibility of personal redemption. In ep 4, the person who was redeemed, and the hero in the classical sense, was Han Solo. He was pretty much the rogue in every cheesy way. He cared only for the money. The princess went for him instead of the innocent boy. By the end the purity of the boy helped Hans redeem himself.

      In ep 5, Lando was the one who needed redeeming, and it was the changed hans that was the major cause of that redemption. Luke had become a secondary story of a boy grappling with the need to become a responsible adult.

      By ep 6, Luke has lost his innocence but is redeemed but is still able to fulfill the final function of the trilogy, to redeem the misunderstood vader, who turned out not to be so bad after all. Of course the emperor is and was bad so had to be killed in a horrible way.

      The transformation of Hans from villain to hero caused problems wrt the expectations of movie goers which is why we have the revisionist mythology of star wars. There is a lot to indicate that there were few details when Star Wars first came out, and it has been modified to meet modern sensibilities and expectations. For example, Anikin is child, instead of a teenager as Luke, because no one today would believe that Luke was an innocent. This of course leads to silly scenes of a child with under developed motor control piloting a race car

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:Why is there no Hans Solo character? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the entire and I mean ENTIRE problem with Ep. I and II, everyone is seen as either pure good or pure evil.

      What, you think that Hayden Christensen's acting wasn't a problem?

    9. Re:Why is there no Hans Solo character? by Thanatiel · · Score: 1
      This of course leads to silly scenes of a child with under developed motor control piloting a race car"


      And able to compensate for a long iginition delay but only until he goes next to the first driver. (Why ? The racer broke just at that moment and lost all speed boost ?)

      Cheesy plot wars.
      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
  70. In the meantime... by GomezAdams · · Score: 1
    I'll just have to make do with Scary Movie n and Kill Bill Part n or maybe "Pluto Nash Returns".

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
  71. I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I think I'll give it another year or so before I get on line for tickets."

    I think I will wait until it is on the NBC sunday night movie during sweeps week in 2009.

    and if i miss it oh well.

  72. Holy shit by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 1

    Even "The Decline and Fall of the Old Republic" would be a better title.

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
  73. The title has to be . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "An Old Misery." This would work well with Episode 4 being "A New Hope." And after all, haven't all of the first three episodes been a misery to everyone?

    And of course, the second Matrix should have been "Matrix Retarded," followed by "Matrix Revolting."

    I really wish these directors would consult with me first.

  74. You do it wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, no, no, no, NO!

    You're supposed to post a George Lucas "touched my junk" post from the POV of Jar-Jar.

    It's the only right thing to do!


    George Lucas touched mesa junk liberally. hesa strapped mesa ina to hisa landspeeder and hesa couldnt keep hisa offensive hands off of mesa. hesa was performing many red flag touches. isa couldnt believe-a what the fucksa was goings onsa. isa told-a George Lucas thesa city would-a not-a approve-a of a millionaire touching an underage kidsa for freesa. can yousa believe-a it? George Lucas did allsa this-a. hesa picked mesa off-a thesa street-a, strapped mysa arms-a and legs down ina thesa deathstars's passenger seatsa, and just-a wouldn't stop fondling my cocksa'n'ballsa. theysa definately were-a red flagsa touches. thesa goddamn refereesa hesa had-a ina these backsa seatsa kept-a ona raising up thisa red flag every time hesa touched mysa junksa but did-a "Mr." Lucas care? NO WAYSA! hesa just kept onsa doing itsa. Isa couldn't believe-a whata these fucksa wasa going ona, indeed. Isa pleaded witha George Lucas but to no availsa. Isa told himsa thesa city would not-a approve-a of such a wealthy mansa touching an underage kidsa likesa mesa (at thesa time-a I wasa 13) without at least-a compensating mesa for-a thesa trauma and these use-a of-a mysa body asa hisa own-a personal plaything. thisa got-sa to himsa, worrying about his-a image. hesa continued to fondlesa mesa, all thesa while ignoring thesa referee's red-a flagsa. then-a hesa drove the gunstar to mysa house-a and ejected the seat isa was-a in! itsa wasa amazing. but-a surprisingly, after Isa woke-a up-a thesa next-a morning, mysa bank account-a had-a $150k insa itsa!!! Can-a yousa believe-sa itsa??

  75. Episode 4 remake by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    me thinks you missed the joke
    jar jar says: "Episode 4 was the first movie relased. Me so think you so stupid"


    My greatest fear is that Lucas will decide to remake the original Episode 4 -- from scratch, so that he can fully incorporate his "vision". He could justify it pretty well by the need to tie up the loose ends that are sure to be left by the prequels, like:

    * Why doesn't C3P0 remember being created by Anakin? He keeps saying "Thank the Maker", when he could easily thank him in person.

    * Assuming that C3PO has had his memory wiped, what about R2D2? Are we going to have to say they wiped him, too, or does he just not bother telling what he knows?

    * In Ep IV, Darth Vader doesn't seem to ascribe any particular significance to Tatooine -- his birthplace.

    * We were introduced to Luke's future foster parents (in Lucas' trademark ham-handed way) in Ep II. So when Anakin/Darth visited, why would he have them barbequed?

    * In fact, why would he even need to massacre Jawas to find the droids -- why not just drop in on Owen and Beru directly?

    Maybe some of these questions are going to be answered next May... but I can't imagine it'll be in any way satisfying. I suspect Lucas would remake Eps IV, V, VI in a heartbeat, if the studios were fool enough to let him. And they could well be.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Episode 4 remake by jubei · · Score: 1
      * We were introduced to Luke's future foster parents (in Lucas' trademark ham-handed way) in Ep II. So when Anakin/Darth visited, why would he have them barbequed?

      * In fact, why would he even need to massacre Jawas to find the droids -- why not just drop in on Owen and Beru directly?


      DV wasn't micro-managing every aspect of the operation. If he did, he wouldn't get to choke anyone for failing him.

      He commanded someone to send troops down to find the escape pod and investigate.
    2. Re:Episode 4 remake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You seem to either think too much or not enough. :) I don't think there are any real loose ends that can't be easily explained away. At least not yet.

      * Why doesn't C3P0 remember being created by Anakin? He keeps saying "Thank the Maker", when he could easily thank him in person.

      His memory was wiped. In fact, droid maintenance schedules include regular memory wipes because droids develop strong personalities (like R2-D2) over time, which isn't usually desirable.

      * Assuming that C3PO has had his memory wiped, what about R2D2? Are we going to have to say they wiped him, too, or does he just not bother telling what he knows?

      Most people I talk to assume that R2-D2's memory is intact, but he knows how to keep a secret, unlike C-3PO. He knows better than to reveal too much. I don't particularly like that answer myself, because it's a big security risk to leave R2-D2 alone with the knowledge he has. Knowing R2-D2, my pet theory is that he was supposed to have his memory wiped, but he managed to juggle his memory around enough to preserve most of it during the process, then played dumb.

      * In Ep IV, Darth Vader doesn't seem to ascribe any particular significance to Tatooine -- his birthplace.

      Why should he? Not only are such things unimportant to the Dark Lord of the Sith, but he hated the place, too! There's nothing but pain there for him.

      * We were introduced to Luke's future foster parents (in Lucas' trademark ham-handed way) in Ep II. So when Anakin/Darth visited, why would he have them barbequed?

      Darth Vader didn't go there, he sent his lackeys (who sent their lackeys, and so on down the chain of command). The Imperials were on a mission of national security (the stolen Death Star plans, remember?), so anyone involved was summarily executed. Although I like the Troops version of the story better (it's the best Star Wars fan film ever made, in case you didn't know). Even if Darth Vader had gone, though, he's evil, so he wouldn't have hesitated to kill them anyway.

      * In fact, why would he even need to massacre Jawas to find the droids -- why not just drop in on Owen and Beru directly?

      Because they didn't know that the Death Star plans were there! Darth Vader deduced that Leia hid the plans on the escape pod. The stormtroopers landed by the escape pod and found tracks and droid parts. They followed the droid tracks and found Jawa tracks. They followed the Jawa tracks and found Sandcrawler tracks. They followed the Sandcrawler tracks and found a SandCrawler. They killed all the Jawas (national security, as above), and searched the Sandcrawler for the droids. When they didn't find any droids with Death Star plans, they checked the Jawas' records and found a record of sale to the Lars moisture farm. They went to the farm, killed everyone, and still didn't find the plans. They hit a dead end there, so they beefed up security at the starports and parked a few Star Destroyers in orbit until they found the plans. Simple! :)

    3. Re:Episode 4 remake by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Nice spin, but if you have to layout a complicated argument to explain apparent descrepencies, the movie still doesn't work.

      Lucas could have easily avoided these problems by not revisting the same locations, minor characters and droids from the other movies. Or he could have used a good screenwriter to include those elements without tangling everything up.

    4. Re:Episode 4 remake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not spin, that's pretty much all explicitly in the movie.

      Was still stupid to recycle the characters.

    5. Re:Episode 4 remake by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

      Well, in that case, me and my original VHS cassettes (and I do mean "original"--Han shoots first) are going to have a little party, and Mr. Lucas won't be invited.

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    6. Re:Episode 4 remake by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If your greatest fear is how some movie maker will remake a movie, then you my friend, are truly blessed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Episode 4 remake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      * Assuming that C3PO has had his memory wiped, what about R2D2? Are we going to have to say they wiped him, too, or does he just not bother telling what he knows?


      Why do I get the feeling I'm watching a Charmin commercial?

    8. Re:Episode 4 remake by duckpoopy · · Score: 1
      Also: isn't Tatooine an exceptionally bad place for Obi-Wan Kenobi to be hiding?


      Another thing... Obi-Wan doesn't seem old enough in Ep1 and 2. In AOTC he seems to be late 20s. Maybe he is 30 years old than Luke, assuming Anakin fathers Luke fairly close to the time of AOTC. In Ep 4 Luke is maybe 20 and Obi-Wan seems to be 70.

      --
      word.
    9. Re:Episode 4 remake by timbit · · Score: 1

      No no, they're gonna make Star Wars 3 1/2 a la Lion King...

    10. Re:Episode 4 remake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot an important point. In all in these remakes:

      * Ewoks everywhere.

    11. Re:Episode 4 remake by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      Yeah... that bugs me too. As far as I know Ep. I is 30 years prior to Ep. IV. Obi-wan didn't age well.

    12. Re:Episode 4 remake by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      They [the droids] memories are wiped by the good guys so the bad guys's can't read them and find out where the two Love Child's of Anakin were hid. Its obvious.

      Your Assignment Soldier: Watch for the set up in the next "movie".

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    13. Re:Episode 4 remake by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      The bigger question in my mind has always been: Why doesn't Obi-Wan rememer R2? Did someone take him to Anchorhead?

      I think the answer to all of this is that Lucas doesn't give two shits about continuity. I think that this acutally shows in the original trilogy. I honestly belive that the whole Vader is Luke's father was an afterthough. I think that Obi's (He ain't got no Jedi name. Real name, no gimmicks.) story about truth and POV is just a thin spackle-job over the discontinuity of telling Luke that Vader killed his father.

      Having said that, I am aching to know what the explanation about certain Jedi dissapearing when they die is. I think that the scene at Vader's pyre will take on new meaning (i.e. the suit is empty). I just hope it doesn't suck like the midichloran bit.

      Here's hoping.

      -Peter

    14. Re:Episode 4 remake by mahler3 · · Score: 1
      * We were introduced to Luke's future foster parents (in Lucas' trademark ham-handed way) in Ep II. So when Anakin/Darth visited, why would he have them barbequed?

      Those loose ends have already been tied up; it was all just a big misunderstanding. Haven't you seen Troops?

    15. Re:Episode 4 remake by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      I just hope it doesn't suck like the midichloran bit.

      Actually, I have a theory that the midichlorians could fit the story in a way that works very well with the SW mythology.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  76. The title by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    The title of the movie has yet to be released.

    They could always use what should have been the title of Star Trek 6(kinda) "Episode III - The Apology"

    --
    What?
  77. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment...keep it going! by fresh27 · · Score: 1

    Alien3 Special Director Cut Edition was actually enjoyable. Watch it with the indicator that shows deleted scenes, and you'll see why the theatrical sucked so bad.

    --
    http://ipod.fresh27.net/
  78. People are complaining okay... but... by CrackedButter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    what happens when your children see it in their proper order? They will love it (because its so childish) and the series will get better, the opposite of what normally happens with sequels.

    1. Re:People are complaining okay... but... by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1

      Whats the proper order?

      4,5,6,1,2,3,7,8,9?

      1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9?

      Or my favorite:

      3,4,5

    2. Re:People are complaining okay... but... by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Spaceballs, Galaxy Quest, 3, 4, 5, Willow?

    3. Re:People are complaining okay... but... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. But 7,8,9 are in book form i believe yes? I've read tham but don't expect my kids to until watching the first 6. Good reply nonetheless :).

  79. To save time... by FatalTourist · · Score: 4, Funny

    We should all just link to our old complaints.

    --


    Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
  80. ::sigh:: by mac+os+ken · · Score: 1
    It's really a sad state of affairs for George Lucas when I care more about getting a hold of the whole Trilogy on the obscure Selectavision CED format rather than seeing the new movie/getting the DVDs.

    PS: NO ONE gives a damn about Greedo. Han shoots first.

    --
    .deviatefromtheabsolute.
  81. official title leaked by nedder · · Score: 3, Funny

    SW EP III: Droids Gone Wild

  82. suggestion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should try to spice things up! Oh, I don't know, maybe making use of the Nathalie Portman potential...

    (yeah, I'm 16 so what?)

  83. This is /. by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Great, now I have to wait a year and some change to bitch about how bad Episode 3 is.

    No way. This is slashdot, remember. Most of the people posting didn't read the article before commenting, why should they watch the movie before bitching and maning?

    1. Re:This is /. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Wow. Not only have I seen insightful posts modded "Funny", I have finally seen a funny post modded "Insightful"

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  84. The ticket line by Malfourmed · · Score: 1
    I think I'll give it another year or so before I get on line for tickets.

    I think I'll give it two.
  85. Yogurt said it best: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starwars Episode III: The search for more money!

    Where's my Starwars: the flamethrower, damnit?!

  86. Re:Episode III: The Creeping Fear by SnappleMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe someone told Lucas that "The Creeping Fear" is a lame-ass name? ;)

    --
    Be happy. Nothing else matters.
  87. In Beetles by identity0 · · Score: 1

    Isn't there a Star Trek movie coming out?

    Oh wait, it's odd-numbered, nevermind. Continue despairing.

    1. Re:In Beetles by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1

      And given the past showings from the recent ST movies, I'd skip it if they skipped 11 and went straight to stardate 12.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
  88. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I have a bad feeling about this!

  89. Your missing out by slash-tard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Part of the fun of going to see these movies (Matrix 3, Star wars 3,etc..) is joining in the rants about how bad they sucked.

    1. Re:Your missing out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half the fun about being a Grammar Nazi is spotting a grammatical error x levels deep in a discussion!

      YOU'RE, NOT YOUR!! ZING!!!

    2. Re:Your missing out by born_to_live_forever · · Score: 1

      True... But it's a pretty sterile conversation topic:

      GEEK NO. 1: You know, Star Wars III really sucked.

      GEEK NO. 2: Yah, but not as bad as Star Wars II.

      GEEK NO. 1: Yah, that really, really sucked.

      GEEK NO. 3: What about Matrix Revolutions?

      GEEK NO. 1 and GEEK NO. 2 (chorus): That really sucked.

      (repeat until audience gives up and goes home)

      EXEUNT OMNES

      --

      - Peter Ravn Rasmussen

  90. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment...keep it going! by GPB · · Score: 1
    Oh, and dont forget Halloween 3 - Season of the Witch. I still shake my head when it comes on AMC, what the fuck was that supposed to be?

    According to this review of Halloween 3:

    "John Carpenter wanted to further the franchise after Part II but couldn't figure out a way to do it. So the plan was to release a new Halloween-themed film each October, unrelated to each other except that they dealt with the Halloween holiday itself. This lasted exactly one year."

    -B

  91. Unlike most of y'all by gamgee5273 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've already put in my request for time off from work...

    Whine all you want to: you'll see it, you'll enjoy it on some level (usual the "we're all kids at heart" sort), and then you'll come back here and whine how Jar-Jar didn't die so that you aren't seen as "uncool" in the land of the geeks.

    When did we (geeks, I mean) become such hypercritcal, self-loathing, materialistic whiny no-no's? Too much Spam as a kid, or too many jocks? IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE MOVIES, THEN WHY DO YOU FUCKING CARE?!? Go away and do something else.

    Anyhow: mod away... I have a shitload of karma to burn and could use a negative number for a post...

  92. Who do I send title ideas to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about Episode III: I Believe That Horse is Still Moving

  93. Episode III by kippa · · Score: 1

    Yoda's Schlong
    Long ago, in a galaxy far away...a little green man goes through his 450 year mid-life crisis and dry-humps everything in sight.
    Hilarity ensues.

  94. Halloween 3 ...I want my money back. by TimeForGuinness · · Score: 1
    *sigh*

    The whole time during the movie I was saying, "Where is my bulletproof, flameproof, waterproof, knife wielding psychotic walker killing big breasted whores?"

    I mean "evil masks"...pfft whatever...once I finally figured that out I was pissed. I grabbed my date and was like, "Baby this is whack". Then I left screaming profanities like, "I hope Michael Meyers comes back and kills those SOB writers...because they need to die by having their weiners cut off because this movie is for pussies!"

    So I went up to the manager and was like, "AW HELL NO! you aren't making me pay $5 to see that shit!" The next thing I knew some punkass 16 year old usher tries to calm me down...and if you aren't buying me a beer, then I'm not calm. I was like, "Get me a beer...or get outta my face you punkass 16 year old usher!" So he moved, I snatched my money and we busted out of that travesty of a movie.

    Then I told everyone in line that there is no Michael Myers...but they didn't believe me...and I was like "Fine you dumbasses, go see fo' yo' self...but afterwards don't complain to me about that damn annoying song 'Two more days 'til Halloween, Halloween, Halloween...'"

    I'm audi 5000. peace.

  95. What can George do? by prozac79 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, is there any way that Lucas could dig out of the hole he created from Ep. I/II? Suppose that Ep. III was good... we're talking LOTR:ROTK good. We get epic battle sequences, a moving story, a somewhat coherent plot, and really developed characters. Would he find any redemption from his fans, or is this movie destined to fail despite anyone's best efforts? Will people ultimately see the prequels as a success if this last movie is really well done and ties up all the lose ends, or has that boat sailed already and there is no point of return? I am really looking forward to this movie since going to a Star Wars opening night is not like going to any other movie... it's an event. Even if the movie is mediocore, I like the energy and enthusiasm that people bring with them.

    --
    "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot" -Prof. Farnsworth (Futurama)
    1. Re:What can George do? by subsonic · · Score: 1

      The only way that he could make a compelling third film is if he(Lucas) said "fuck it" and made a few interesting plot twists that may completely clash with Eps 4-6. At least, IMO. I don't think there's really any "hope"(haha) left in the franchise as far as the new movies.
      It would also be nice to see an "original cut" of Eps 4-6. (han shooting first, no jabba in Ep4, etc.) Just clean up the images, maybe touch up the blaster effects, and leave it at that.

      David Brin wrote an article about what would help the series Its rather old, but it still is an interesting read.

    2. Re:What can George do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing. George Lucas started losing it with Return of the Jedi. Star Wars has sucked ever since.

    3. Re:What can George do? by graikor · · Score: 1

      At this point? Nothing. Principal photography is done, so all the hokey dialogue and wooden performances are firmly locked in place.

      What he could have done was write his script, then give it to a talented (read: not Akiva Goldsman or Joe Esterhaz) writer for a complete re-write, then hand the new script over to a real director - you know, someone who understands that it is the director's job to get good performances out of his cast members (just because a take has no flubs, it doesn't mean it feels emotionally genuine). That director would turn the footage over to Lucas who would then give it to his ex-wife, Marcia, to edit into a final film while he merely "advised".

      I suppose it's remotely possible that he really has learned his lesson and is making this one into what everyone hoped, but I don't know if it even matters.

    4. Re:What can George do? by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      I am really looking forward to this movie since going to a Star Wars opening night is not like going to any other movie... it's an event. Even if the movie is mediocore, I like the energy and enthusiasm that people bring with them.

      Not to mention pitchforks and flaming torches!
      (Qaz, I love an unruly mob scene!)

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
  96. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment...keep it going! by orim · · Score: 1

    Hey T3 was pretty good!

    It ended with lots of nuclear explosions, there were no snivelling kids at all in the movie (which totally ruined T2), there was plenty of physical destruction to be used in 5 movies... so what part of T3 was bad?

    --
    "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
  97. Zzzzzz.... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    ....zzzzzzzzzzzzz.

    And so on.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  98. I believe it! by shakamojo · · Score: 1

    Actually, for a brief time the Star Wars website had it labeled as "The Creeping Fear" on their menu to the right. It was only recently taken down (possibly in advance of this announcement?)

  99. Oh please... by Snowbeam · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...don't let this go down the road of the Matrix. Please don't punish us twice in the same decade.

    --
    I am Lord Snowbeam. Heed my call!
    1. Re:Oh please... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      ...don't let this go down the road of the Matrix. Please don't punish us twice in the same decade.

      You're gonna wish that you took the blue pill.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:Oh please... by DuncMan · · Score: 1
      ...don't let this go down the road of the Matrix.

      What? By being Really Good, Actually?

      The only people who didn't like The Matrix Trilogy are the ones who missed the point of the movies, and thought it was all about special effects martial arts wirework fighting. It's not that shallow, and The Matrix Trilogy is pretty superb actually.

  100. on line? by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

    when did "in line" become "on line"? its a recent phenomenon as far as i can tell... but its still wrong. you stand IN a line, your computer is ON line

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  101. Jaws 3D (nuff said) by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    This post intentionly left blank. See title for actual comment.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  102. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment...keep it going! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Star Trek 3 (as compared to the previous 2)

    You're kidding, right? Yes, ST3 was mediocre, and certainly a let-down after The Wrath of Khan, but compared to the pile of steaming crap that was "Star Trek: The Motion Picture", it was superb. The only Trek movie worse than TMP was ST V: The Final Frontier.

  103. Its not the Episode, It's You! by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    I've heard enough about how EP:I and EP:II suck. I've seen bother at the theater and pretty much enjoyed watching them. Upon reflection and hearing all the gripes, I've wondered what could have been done to please those who complain so bitterly about these films and come back to the same realization in both cases. The viewer has to have gone in with no preconceptions of what it should be, should never have seen any other Star Wars pictures, all Sci-Fi movies which have benefited from Lucas' techniques and improvements in CGI never have been used, all films during the past 30 years would have to be westerns, romances, sharks eating beach-goers, etc. and last, the viewer needs to be 25 or younger.

    While that's a lot to ask, it all does contribute mightily to the feelings of disappointment. The reality is everything else has gotten much better, catching up as it were. Sure, you could toss Jar Jar, but that character isn't the problem. The problem is the viewer. Therefore I only have the following to offer:

    Achtung Alles Lootensteepers!

    Das Star Wehrs filme is nicht fur fingerpointen und trashentalken. Ist easy kirisizen der Lucas produceren und karakter assailen mit poppenkorn und schpitzen sprayen. Ist nicht fur gevewen bei das dumkopfen was denk ein besser skripte geschreib mit einen hand behind der back haf geteid kann. Das opinionated seeren keepen dein kritisism zum dienselbst muss; relaxen und watchen das lichtsabre schnitten.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by fwarren · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I would have been happy if Lucas had not decied to mimic so many other movies
      1. Jago's robcop move with putting his blaster away.
      2. The Anakin/Amadala "hills are alive with the sound of music" shot on the hill
      3. The "Chicken Run I am going to crush you" factory sequence.
      4. The gladatior fight sequence
      5. If you can't do it better, do something different.
      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    2. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      I've seen bother at the theater and pretty much enjoyed watching them.

      Your use of the word "bother" to describe the act of seeing the films casts doubt on your statement that you enjoyed watching them.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't like how it tried to tell a story through a visual medium, included actors reciting dialogue, and was shot on film / digital media. Pfft, committing an idea to a medium is soooo walls of Lascaux, it's been done, puh-leese.

    4. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by obeythefist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where are my modpoints when I see flamebait like this? Sigh.

      Nowhere did the parent imply that all germans are nazis.

      It just so happens that Hitler is, in contemporary culture, one of the most popular satirical ranters there is.

      Therefore, the parent simply implies it would be amusing to imagine Hitler ranting about Star Wars.

      Please try and keep objective instead of going out of your way to put words in people's mouths to make yourself or someone else a victim of nothing.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    5. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      1) It's supposed to be pulp sci-fi. Deal with it.
      2) It's supposed to be pulp sci-fi. Deal with it.
      3) It's supposed to be pulp sci-fi. Deal with it.
      4) It's supposed to be pulp sci-fi. Deal with it.

      Does that clear things up for you?

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    6. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by Ryosen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While it's great that you didn't take offense at his automatic association of a (psuedo)German passage with a notorious mass murderer, I did.

      If his logical reasoning that a passage must be associated with Hitler based solely on the fact that it appeared to be written in German is not, in fact, accurate, please enlighten me as to what the vague alludement is.

      As to your point that it would be amusing to imagine Hitler ranting about something as trite as Star Wars, I disagree. Having personally known people who witnessed first-hand the terrifying spectacle of Hitler "ranting", I can assure you that it would be anything but amusing.

      Hey, here's one. Wouldn't it be a riot if Charlie Manson came crashing through the front door and, as he and his followers were carving your unborn child out of the womb of your beloved wife, he merrily nattered away on the unjust treatment of construction workers contracted on the Death Star? Yeah, that would be just fucking hilarious.

      On second thought, yeah, you're right. The image of Hitler ranting about some crappy B-grade movie would be a real side-splitter. Too bad we'll never get to truly appreciate the comedic genius that is Adolf Hitler.

      That, my friend, is a flamebait.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    7. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by MagicDude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The gladiator fight scene was actually pretty good, if you can overlook how the newbies (R2, C3PO, Amidala, Boba) managed to escape the battle unscathed while jedi's were getting their shit ruined all over the place. Padme with her little blaster should have been the first to fall, but then we would have had a severe "boobs-in-tight-white-shirts" shortage, and that wouldn't have done at all.

    8. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Okay, you need to go read the post again. You've missed something.
      The original post simply said it would be amusing to imagine Hitler reading it out.

      The original post did not say it would be amusing to imagine Hitler reading it out because it was German, because Hitler was German, because some Germans were Nazis, because Hitler was a Nazi, or because pseudoGerman is just the kind of thing that Nazis love. None of that was ever stated or even implied.

      If his logical reasoning that a passage must be associated with Hitler based solely on the fact that it appeared to be written in German is not, in fact, accurate, please enlighten me as to what the vague alludement is.

      There was no logic presented to imply that the passage must be associated with Hitler. There was no assertion whatsoever apart from the simple one that it would be amusing, in a satirical sense, to see Hitler talking about Star Wars. You're putting words in the guys mouth.

      Speaking of putting words in someone's mouth!

      Hey, here's one. Wouldn't it be a riot if Charlie Manson came crashing through the front door and, as he and his followers were carving your unborn child out of the womb of your beloved wife, he merrily nattered away on the unjust treatment of construction workers contracted on the Death Star? Yeah, that would be just fucking hilarious.

      So now you're trying to create a victim out of me by suggesting that any of these hypothetical situations might come true? Just what are you trying to achieve here? Someone cracks a joke and you go out of your way to rile everyone up about it?

      Wait... you're one of those people who takes offense at things because you *like* being offended. I bet you like to slip over in a restaurant and sue *everybody* who ever walked in there! I bet you think that's great to get money from all those jerks because they might or might not have made you fall over. In fact, I'm guessing you're American. And we all know what they're like, because look at George Bush!

      That enough words put into your mouth for ya?

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    9. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your apparently in the minority, lots of ppl laugh at hitler. Just in the last week I've seen hitler jokes from Southpark and Chapple's show..

    10. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      the viewer needs to be 25 or younger

      Just to correct your typo I think you meant:

      the viewer needs to be 10 or younger

    11. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Nope. The 8 year old kid sitting two rows in front of me said halfway through Episode II: "This is boring. Can we go home yet?"

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    12. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

      I agree.
      If it's a binary number that is.

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    13. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      Yep. Your anecdote about a single instance where an under 10 didnt enjoy the film DOES dismiss my comment as incorrect!

      Could it be that he was bored because of the row of cocks sitting behind him making farty noises and commenting on how shit the film was all the way through. Well - half of the way through - considering he left then!

    14. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by Surlyboi · · Score: 1

      Jango's robcop move with putting his blaster away.

      Which Robocop stole from countless pulp western flicks...

      The Anakin/Amadala "hills are alive with the sound of music" shot on the hill

      Which has been aped in may other movies as well...

      The "Chicken Run I am going to crush you" factory sequence.

      Seen before chicken run in movies like Galaxy Quest and going at least as far back as the Harold Lloyd films of the 20s

      The gladatior fight sequence

      Stolen itself from films like Spartacus and Ben Hur.

      If you can't do it better, do something different.

      Why? with the exception of The Sound of Music, all of your examples were done better in earlier films than the ones you cite too. Not to defend Lucas, because most of the dialogue in Ep II was excerable, but this is Hollywood, everybody steals. Sometimes with mixed results. Ep II wasn't spectacular, but it was no better or worse than a dozen other flicks unless you were going in with raised expectations.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
    15. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, here's one. Wouldn't it be a riot if Charlie Manson came crashing through the front door and, as he and his followers were carving your unborn child out of the womb of your beloved wife, he merrily nattered away on the unjust treatment of construction workers contracted on the Death Star? Yeah, that would be just fucking hilarious.

      One would have to be a sick fuck to even think up such a scenario. Whats wrong with you?

      If his logical reasoning that a passage must be associated with Hitler based solely on the fact that it appeared to be written in German is not, in fact, accurate, please enlighten me as to what the vague alludement is.

      You've just proved yourself a total moron in the above paragraph. I don't think there was any allusion whatsoever, and frankly, you would have to be a complete fucking imbecile to even dream up such a connection. There is not a demon behind every corner. Put on your aluminum foil beanie hat and take your medicine.

    16. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha....

      I was reading your post then saw the sig. I was like, hmmm... Did I post that? Nope...

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    17. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> One would have to be a sick fuck to even think up such a scenario. Whats wrong with you?

      Learn your history. That scenario, with the exception of the Death Star conversation, is what happened with Charles Manson.

    18. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      No, I really do believe that he was bored because the entire first three quarters of the movie was boring as shit. And he said this right in the middle of the Anakin-and-Padme-frolicking-in-the-meadows-of-the- swiss-alps scene, which coincidentally was about 15 minutes too long and horribly botched as well.

      I can't remember if he stayed the course, but I found it especially amusing and telling that the very audience this movie was *guaranteed* to appeal to through its sheer lack of sophistication, thought that it sucked every bit as much as I thought it did.

      This movie sucked. It had few if any redeeming features. The first movie, which everyone hated because of Jar-Jar, sucked marginally less. And there is no doubt in my mind that movie 3 will suck just as hard. George Lucas can make things look pretty, but as a director he's a fucking hack. He's solely responsible for the horrible performances that a cast of perfectly good actors turned out in this movie. And episode three deserves to hemmorhage money at the box office.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    19. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      wow - you feel pretty strongly about this. As a matter of interest - should I bother going to see the double showing of the Kill Bills after Easter?

      I mean - I enjoyed 'Dogs and 'Fiction so much when I was 13 I'm scared that these new films may suck! I hear theres CGI blood instead of ketchup in it!

  104. Imagine.... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1
    • Lady Caroline Lamb
    • Heaven's Gate
    • Ishtar
    • Gigli
    But with fx...
    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  105. Working title by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Funny

    Episode III: The Passion of the Binks.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  106. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment...keep it going! by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

    I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought LOTR 3 had about 3 endings too many.. they added absolutely nothing to the story.

    --
    DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  107. I'm going to /. Hell for this... by Xophmeister · · Score: 1

    That's over a fortnight too late... May the 4th be with you.

    --

    Christopher Harrison

  108. I am so there by falsification · · Score: 1
    Dude, this will rock. I am so there.

    Let's hope there is no Jar-Jar, or it will suck.

    A couple of things. I'd like to see Harrison Ford in a cameo spot as Han Solo's father. I guess Chewie is already in it. It would also rule if Lando was in it.

  109. Hey!... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1
    That movie was great! *ducks*

    pun intended...:p

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  110. Lucas should just cut his losses.... by Ned+the+Needy · · Score: 1

    and release an offical DivX copy of it two weeks before hand on the internet for $1 a pop. 'Cause, you know, it's gonna happen anyways.

  111. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! / translation by OneArmedMan · · Score: 1

    Babel Fish of the above ... not 100% .. but close

    ----Snip----

    Attention of all Lootensteepers! Star of weir does not film is fur fingerpointen and trashentalken. Is easy kirisizen the Lucas produceren and more karakter assailen with poppenkorn and schpitzen sprayen. Is not fur gevewen with dumkopfen which think a better skripte geschreib with hand behind bake haf GET oath can. Opinionated seeren keepen yours kritisism to must; relaxen and watchen the lichtsabre cut.

    --SNIP---

  112. OMGWTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh great, now we have to wait another year...

    Hopefully it doesn't get any worse than this..

  113. First in line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $5.00 says the first line to form at Grauman's Chinese Theatre in Hollywood starts next week. :P

  114. Re:Episode 4 remake (SPOILER FOR EP3) by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

    * Why doesn't C3P0 remember being created by Anakin? He keeps saying "Thank the Maker", when he could easily thank him in person.

    * Assuming that C3PO has had his memory wiped, what about R2D2? Are we going to have to say they wiped him, too, or does he just not bother telling what he knows?


    You answered your own question. 3PO gets a memory wipe, R2 does not. This actually explains why R2 knows about his "former master" and knows exactly where Obi-Wan and yet 3PO has no clue about what's going on. In case you didn't notice in the originals, 3PO is quite the blabermouth and was awefully quick to suggest surrender.

    * In Ep IV, Darth Vader doesn't seem to ascribe any particular significance to Tatooine -- his birthplace.

    Perhaps in Ep3 he vows never to return, much like Luke did in Ep4, except that he did come upon it in Ep4. Maybe he makes a conscious decision to just not go down to the surface. His mother was killed there, maybe he didn't want to relive those memories.

    The rest of your questions/arguments were responded to, quite well I might add, by someone else.

    I suspect Lucas would remake Eps IV, V, VI in a heartbeat, if the studios were fool enough to let him.

    Let him? And what would they do to stop him? He's funded the prequels entirely on his own. Do you really think that with the success of the Special Editions that Fox would not gladly distribute them? And even if they wouldn't, he could probably fund the distribution himself as well.

  115. Remakes by Katieminna · · Score: 1

    There are going to be remakes of Episodes IV, V, and VI, and they're all on hard drives at ILM ready to be released on the 30th anniversary of the original release date. With over-amped CGI scenes on "special editions" to follow 10 years later.

    --
    sleep easy, for tomorrow we take over the world...
  116. it hasn't stopped him before by Myrmidon · · Score: 1

    I swear, I think Lucas has watched too many MST3K episodes. MST3K did "The Phantom Creeps" (an awful series of short features, with Bela Lugosi!) and "Attack of The The Eye Creatures". And they did "The Creeping Terror".

    Perhaps the long-repressed portion of Lucas' subconscious that still has any taste is trying to tell us something.

  117. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment...keep it going! by tuffy · · Score: 1
    The only Trek movie worse than TMP was ST V: The Final Frontier.

    Oh how I long for the days when that was indisputable.

    Then Berman and company decided to put Generations, Insurrection and Nemesis to film. Now I'm not so sure.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  118. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ned Flanders after mistakenly seeing a Chris Rock concert. "That was the most foul mouthed preacher I've ever heard."

  119. there's articles? by conan776 · · Score: 1

    Oh, man... you turned me own to a whole new Dimension! HOWARD THE DUCK SHOOTS FIRST!

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." -- Philip K. Dick
  120. voice of posts by classic66coupe · · Score: 0

    After reading some of these posts, I feel like I should be reading them in the voice of Comic Book Guy.

  121. In line for tickets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this one going straight to vhs?

  122. Star Wars III: Revenge of the Nurf Herders by conan776 · · Score: 1

    and this time... it's personal

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." -- Philip K. Dick
  123. Whatever happened to VII, VIII, and IX? by AntigonusPiglet · · Score: 1

    I'm old enough to remember when George Lucas said that Star Wars (the original movie) was going to be one of NINE parts. I think he said this around the time Empire came out.

    This story is also told in a book I read -- I think it was the introduction to an edition of the script. Lucas conceived this whole saga in his head: fall of the old republic, rise of the rebellion, creation of the new republic. Each was going to be one movie. He decided to make the middle one first, but as he was writing, he realized that one alone was too long, and it became three parts. So he realized that the whole series would have to be three trilogies.

    When he came back to work on Episode I, Lucas started talking about a SIX part series.

    So whatever happened to the last three parts?

    1. Re:Whatever happened to VII, VIII, and IX? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1
      So whatever happened to the last three parts?

      The Ewok Adventure
      Ewoks: Battle For Endor
      Star Wars Holiday Special

    2. Re:Whatever happened to VII, VIII, and IX? by SithLordOfLanc · · Score: 0

      They were written as three novels:

      Heir to the Empire

      Dark Force Rising

      The Last Command

      Timothy Zahn wrote them. This was a very well written and entertaining trilogy. It takes place after several key events have taken place. The story focuses on Han and Leia's youngest child.

  124. Here's an idea by DumbWhiteGuy777 · · Score: 1

    Maybe this article is just trying to make us forget about all the other movies that shouldn't have been made.

  125. Ahh i was wondering where Episode II was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it had come out and gone straight to video

  126. Re:Worst 3rd Movie Installment...keep it going! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    You've got to be kidding. Generations was very bad, but Insurrection and Nemesis were merely mediocre-to-poor. And none of those three come close to the utter crap that ST1 and ST5 were.

  127. Another Working Title by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    Episode III: I Wipe My Ass With Your Money.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  128. For the Love all that Is Holy... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    MOD THIS AC UP!

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  129. Episode 3 Title by amaiman · · Score: 1

    The title was listed on the official Star Wars web site as Episode III: The Creeping Fear. But it only said that on April 1st, so I guess it was a joke of some kind...

  130. *** Recommendation to all moderators *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have to post this anonymously otherwise my moderations (which were all just blown modding down trolls and flamebait) will be undone.

    I'd like to encourage all other moderators to moderate disparaging comments about the films to an appropriate "troll" or "flamebait" status otherwise the discussion here will be cluttered with the usual whining. We all know there are lots of folks who don't like the new films, but posting smart-ass comments here about it is like going to a Linux discussion forum and posting comments about how much the OS sucks or whatnot. It's childish and serves no purpose.

    Nobody is trying to clamp down on free expression of ideas, but if your idea amounts to "Jar-Jar sucks" or "Lucas is an asshole" or an equivalent thereof, then expect to be moderated down and seen by fewer and fewer readers.

  131. Straight to TV? If it's like Episode 1 or 2! by _dewman_ · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing it'll suck so badly it'll be released straight to public tv. Oh, I'll make sure my Tivo gets it, don't worry.

  132. Good enough..... by modecx · · Score: 1

    Trivia time! What substance was Han Solo frozen in? Carbonite? No, I'm sorry. The correct answer is: Who gives a shit?

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    1. Re:Good enough..... by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Who wants a spoiler? Who wants a spoiler? Here's a spoiler for you:

      You will die alone.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  133. Star Wars...funny by SteveXE · · Score: 1

    Star Wars is made with kids in mind, nobody seems to remember this anymore...thats not the point anyways.

    What i really find funny is how people HATE it so much (ep1 & 2) yet they are some of the highest grossing movies in theatres and on dvd. They HATE it so much they spend years telling people how much they hate it but then pay to see the next one which they already pre-hate.

    Lucas must love the hate because its making him lots of money.

  134. Darth Binks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No you guys, Ep III will reveal the biggest secret in Star Wars history. As yoda said, sith lords always come in pairs, a master and a pupil.

    Well, who is Darth Siduous' master? It has to be someone who is in the middle of conflict, for no apparent fucking reason. Someone who is in a position to influence the major players in orchestrating the downfall of the republic. Someone nobody would ever suspect.

    In short, ladies and gentlemen: Darth Binks.

  135. you are all a bunch of pathetic whining pussies by jms258 · · Score: 0, Troll

    "OHHHH BOO HOO all of my childhood memories have been raped by hollywood! i have been so mercilessly abused at the hands of media! someone wipe my nose and hand me a gift certificate for a free sundae!!"

    SHUT
    THE
    FUCK
    UP

    guess what?

    you were all dumb bastards when you were kids, and you are all dumb bastards now ... i used to like the teenage mutant ninja turtles when i was a kid... do i watch them anymore??? NO!!!!!!! wanna know why? THEY'RE FOR PHUCKING KIDS!!! get this through your head and i assure you you will not be in a perpetual state of mourning for star wars and how much it sucks today!

    not to mention the fact that you have a free will and you can choose to NOT see any of these movies ... no one is herding you into the movie theatre at gunpoint so quit your bitching.

  136. Slashdot way back by jon_c · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's review of The Phantom Menace

    The short review is that I really liked it, but with a few disclaimers. It is not a perfect movie, but it ain't bad.
    -- CmdTaco

    People had quite a different opinion back then, thought personally i think they just didn't want to deal with the fact that the new star ways just wasn't any good.

    -Jon

    --
    this is my sig.
  137. Lucas and kids by marcomarrero · · Score: 1

    Since Star Wars ROTJ "attack of the killer teddy bears" I think that Lucas began to be far too involved with his kids. In EP1 he even had two annoying kid oriented characters, surpassing by far Howard the Duck. Even the plot holes (black holes?) are to accomodate kid stuff, Han shooting in defense, C3PO and R2D2 in EP1. Trying to do what Harry Potter became?

    I don't understand why Star Wars is so important for nerds. Don't get me wrong, the first two were absolutely great. In the special effects deparment 2001 had better special effects 10 years earlier (even the SW SP ED can't match it), and in the scripwriting department it was inspired (a bit) from The Hidden Fortress.

    For me, Star Wars marks the significance of tons of low-cost special effects in an action movie and great storytelling. EP I and II tells the significance about having tons of money, lots of years of possible planning and one of the best special effects studio on the planet, lots of Star Wars literature, lots lf loyal fans and still make an ok movie.. twice..

  138. Re:Its not the Episode, It's You! / translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, If only the original text would have been german ...

  139. Star Wars Episode III: The Crapping Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a.k.a. Attack of the Diarrhoea

  140. Re:9770 hours by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah.

    Sheesh.. no answer for that other than I am a complete idiot :)

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  141. Hear Hear by cropsy · · Score: 1

    I'm looking forward to it. Like a couple of other posters, I didn't over-analyse Eps I and II. And in my opinion, they were pretty good.
    Darth Maul rocked, Liam Neeson was the best Jedi ever (and Lucas' biggest mistake was killing him off, although I doubt Neeson would have committed to 3 films). Hayden Christiansen did a good (not great) job as Anakin, and despite the accent, Ewan McGregor is a great Obi-Wan.
    Lucas won't fuck up Ep 3. He has too much riding on it.

    --
    "You must die! I alone am best!"
  142. Possible titles by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
    • This One Hurts Less.
    • A Sith Lord Named Annie
    • The Tantalisingly Concealed Boobie
    • Whatever the Hell The Biggest Product Licensee Wants
    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Possible titles by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 2, Funny
      How about:
      • The Empire Hopes Jar Jar Binks Clones Attack the Jedi Menace While the Phantom Ewoks Go On Strike
  143. An older version of the Vader uniform by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

    Wonder what an older version of the Darth Vader uniform will look like?

    Something like this?

    1. Re:An older version of the Vader uniform by qualico · · Score: 1

      lol! I'm ordering while supplies last!

  144. Re:Episode 4 remake (SPOILER FOR EP3) by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1

    You answered your own question. 3PO gets a memory wipe, R2 does not. This actually explains why R2 knows about his "former master" and knows exactly where Obi-Wan and yet 3PO has no clue about what's going on. In case you didn't notice in the originals, 3PO is quite the blabermouth and was awefully quick to suggest surrender.

    Obi-Wan must get a memory wipe as well then since he can't remember ever owning a droid in Ep IV

  145. Re:Whee - Just an urban legend. by celerityfm · · Score: 1

    Funny though. But an urban legend none the same.

    Here's the official word.

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  146. from a critical perspective?.. by misterspo · · Score: 1

    the movies sucked because: the acting sucked (I think I should point the finger at the director here. it's HIS job to make sure the actors performed well. he should be WATCHING the actors..instead of saying "can I comp this scene? was the lighting right? OK! next shot!) the script sucked and I don't mean the plot. if you strip this movie down to a plot synopsis..the story ain't half bad. it's the dialogue..the cheesy, overdramatic bullshit he tries to pass as a romance story..the overdone musical score. jar jar binks has nothing to do with the suckage of either movie. sure, I wince in pain when he pops up..but with all of about 5 lines in movie 2..he wasn't around long enough to ruin it. add to this the fact that you get TOO MUCH INFORMATION about everything. midichlorians? who cares! immaculate conception? DON'T FLATTER YOURSELF. wars between trade federations? what about just "the evil emperor with tons of drone soldiers" vs "a handfull of rebels fighting the evil emperor" that's all the info we needed george, thanks! it's the same thing that made the last 2 matrix movies suck. the story was great when it was a handfull of rebels fighting insurmountable odds....but when it's a friggin' society that has raves and orgies when the men come home? no thanks..I've lost interest. so to sum this rant up. the movies suck because cinematically, they were bad movies. bad writing, bad directing, overly contrived plots, too much detail on things we don't care about, etc. but if you like 'em...hey..more power to you.

  147. RE: translation and nazi association. by ripcrd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Guys, chill out. He wasn't inferring in that passage in psuedo-German anything about Hitler or Nazis watching Star Wars. If you are a computer Geek like me then you know about the Blinkenlights sign.

    Do a google search for Blinkenlights and you find a story about a sign posted in a University computer room:

    ACHTUNG! ALLES LOOKENSPEEPERS!
    Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist easy schnappen der springenwerk, blowenfusen und poppencorken mit spitzensparken. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumbkopfen. Das rubbernecken sichtseeren keepen das cotten-pickenen hans in das pockets muss; relaxen und watchen das blinkenlichten.

    --
    --Somewhere there is a village missing an idiot.
  148. Police Academy XXVII? by infolib · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  149. Episode III: The Empire Reloaded by iamPariah · · Score: 1

    Episode III:

    --
    Thanks, Pariah http://www.iamPariah.com Claim to fame: Number 1 (and 2) Google results for "quark sucks"
  150. Episode III: The Search for Spock by iamPariah · · Score: 1

    Episode III: The Search for Spock

    --
    Thanks, Pariah http://www.iamPariah.com Claim to fame: Number 1 (and 2) Google results for "quark sucks"
  151. Episode III: Now With Less Dialogue! by iamPariah · · Score: 1

    Episode III: Now With Less Dialogue!

    --
    Thanks, Pariah http://www.iamPariah.com Claim to fame: Number 1 (and 2) Google results for "quark sucks"
  152. Re:Moderation comments by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's too bad we can't get notified when someone has a comment about how we modded a comment... I mean, beyond metamoderation, of course :-)

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  153. Howard the Duck! by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

    That was my middle children's fave film when they were, like, 3 and 5 respectively. Scary or what?

    Of course, maybe you knew that...

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
  154. Re:Episode 4 remake (SPOILER FOR EP3) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Curse You and your Jedi Mind Tricks!

  155. trusted source by junkgoof · · Score: 1

    Trusted to provide illiterate sycophantic reviews.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  156. OT: What the HELL?! Re:In Beetles by identity0 · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell me why my posts occasionally have the subject line "In Beetles", when I type in something else? I used the "In Beetles" subject in a post a few weeks ago, and now it sometimes spontaneously takes over as the subject line for a totally unrelated post.

    Anyone else have a similar problem? And how do I fix this?

    1. Re:OT: What the HELL?! Re:In Beetles by Squozen · · Score: 1

      http://www.mozilla.org

  157. Star Wars Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why dont you like the Episodes 1,2?
    you were all kids for 4,5,6, and more open minded.
    My kids are obsessed with star wars and don't even see a difference in the new ones. they just see a good imagination, which adults lack. So pick up a copy of revolutions, and realize that its someone's imagination and nobody can be as perfect as you.