Slashdot Mirror


Cut-Rate Windows 'XP Starter Edition' in Thailand

zlel writes "Microsoft has decided on an official name - 'Windows XP Starter Edition' - for the stripped-down, cut-rate version of Windows that it first began offering in Thailand last summer."

478 comments

  1. I want a copy! by MrMojado · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where Can I get my English version of this "cut rate" enhancement?

    1. Re:I want a copy! by darkpixel2k · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    2. Re:I want a copy! by Citizen+Gold · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why? Are you retarded or something?

    3. Re:I want a copy! by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, you know I haven't RTFA, but since I have written extensively about it in my journal and was living there when it was introduced in response to a million pre-installed Linux machines, I'll comment anyway.

      The menus are all in Thai, and cannot be modified, meaning that many installed programs wouldn't appear on the menus or possibly even run. It was only available on the"Eua Athorn" computers, a low cost Celeron socket 370 government program. In fact, though the legal copies could be installed when the computers were picked up, few people did it, and instead had their friend put a pirated copy from Panthip Plaza or similar place on for them.
      It was a failure of an idea, and will continue to be. It was designed to start THais on legal software, and move them up to the full versions later. Few bought the idea, beccause it involved changing their old habit for a greater expense, and the brief shadow of government enforcement quickly faded away.

      I had great hopes for the million Linux machine program, but alas.

  2. Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this the software equivalent of those first cigarettes behind the toilet block? You know, the ones that get you hooked for life?

    1. Re:Analogy? by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've already seen a few posts like this in this thread, and I have to say... the mentality around here confuses me sometimes. If Microsoft products aren't any good, as is repeatedly said around here, then how could people get hooked on them...?

      I'm not saying they are good or aren't good, I'm just saying... y'all don't make any sense :)

      --
      ~ Aero
    2. Re:Analogy? by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You get hooked when your data and files start accumulating in a proprietary format which may be difficult to translate over.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    3. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So by your argument, cigarettes must be a good product, as people continue to smoke them? Don't by any chance work for a cigarette PR firm, with thinking like that?

      You've missed the point. Just as people on drugs are addicted and don't see any alternative, so people on MS products get stuck with proprietory data formats and incompatibility and don't see any easy way out of their prison, even if they want to leave. The quality of the product has nothing to do with continued use.

    4. Re:Analogy? by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And your infrastructure. It's not trivial to switch a network with thousands of users from Exchange to a Unix/Linux product.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    5. Re:Analogy? by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People generally start smoking because they like cigarettes, to my knowledge. I didn't say they weren't hazardous to your health, nor did I say Microsoft products were 'good for you' (although I'd be surprised if you made an argument they were actually unhealthy... although I suppose on Slashdot, anything goes...)

      Also, MS Word can save as RTF and a variety of other formats, you know... it's up to you.

      I guess IHBT, IHL, etc. I will HAND :P

      --
      ~ Aero
    6. Re:Analogy? by netdudeuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, Microsoft users are not stuck with incompatability ! Actually, while they stay with Microsoft they enjoy more compatability, not less, and that's why some users choose not to move.

      Also, the quality of a product has much to do with continued use. This applies equally to Microsoft or Linux products. Isn't that why Linux users like Linux - because they see high quality ?

    7. Re:Analogy? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I'm a microsoft user. I see a reason to use windows (compatability with older software). I've been trying out different distros on my laptop. I see a way out, it's just that I don't need to leave.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    8. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Isn't that why Linux users like Linux - because they see high quality ?

      It's a factor, but for some people it is not the reason. Speaking for myself, I also see freedom. If the quality wasn't there, I would still persevere (and try to improve the quality) in the name of freedom.

      Nice to be having a reasonably sane (and flame free) conversation.

    9. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Why should MS users have to put up with ANY incomptibility? If they chose, MS could easily make their software talk well to other software. If MS made their file format specifications available, most other software would jump at the chance to talk seamlessly with MS software.

      Rather than putting up with "adequate compatibility", woudln't it be better to demand 100% comptibility from MS?

    10. Re:Analogy? by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. I know what you mean--people keep saying I'm addicted, too. But I can quit any time.

    11. Re:Analogy? by kryonD · · Score: 1

      "I'm a microsoft user...it's just that I don't need to leave."

      No shares or options in the company huh? Set your eye's on your boss's position. Make sure you are dead good at your job, but also learn how to do his as well. Unless you are cursed with some form of anti-social psychotic behavior, promotion is inevitable. Continue on this track and you will eventually end up with a budget that is not large enough for what you need to do. Once you are there, look at how much money you are spending on Exchange, IIS, and MS SQL. Then look at IMAP, Apache, and Postgres. Unless your company actually USES the calendar features of Exchange, your users will notice very little difference. Your budget will see an enourmous chunk of money freed up from license fees and the sheer extra hardware required by exchange's poor scaling abilities. I can think of no redeeming qualities for IIS and CERT's recent recommendation to flat out STOP using IE should be profound enough. Postgres is actually the most SQL compliant RDBMS on the market and can easily migrate in all your existing SQL tables (triggers and stored proceedures will require some effort, but very few small to medium sized businesses ever use them). Notice I never made an arugument for switching your desktops to Linux. Good security policies and Antivirus practices can keep the main detractor from MS on the desktop at bay and the transition to Linux with OO is still not smooth enough to be called worry free, but eventually even that line item on your anual budget is going to grow into a "need"

      --
      I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause. --Dostoevsky
    12. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > People generally start smoking because they like cigarettes, to my knowledge.

      Your knowledge is faulty.

      People generally start smoking because they're young and see "everyone else doing it", so they do so to fit in, coughing and hacking until their lungs get used to it - and until the nicotine has had a chance to make itself known, so the hacking and coughing doesn't seem so bad anymore.

      The pleasure of smoking is from the drug nicotine, not from smoking per se. Inhaling smoke is an unnatural act that mammals will try to avoid.

    13. Re:Analogy? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      That is partly because pop3 makes a poor replacement for an exchange server.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    14. Re:Analogy? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Addicted to what?

      That's like going up to somebody and saying "Oh, you drive a BMW? Why not get a Honda? Oh, you're addicted to BMW? That's too bad"

      It's an operating system. It works for what I need it to do. Addiction doesn't factor shit into the discussion.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    15. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the monkey on your back talking, man. Wouldn't you like to get free?

    16. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I AM free! I use what I like and what WORKS FOR ME! What I like and what works for me may not be the "popular" and "cool" things on slashdot, but who the fuck cares?! I use what I use. You don't like it? Well, tough crap. You can't convince me to use something else unless you have a really good reason. Such as a large sum of money being deposited into my offshore bank account.

    17. Re:Analogy? by finkployd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IMAP makes a nice replacement for the mail portion of exchange. Plus as an added bonus it scales nicely. Last I heard MS ran some 200-400 exchange servers for their company which is insignificant compared to the university I work at with 130,000+ users and 4-5 million emails a day. We tend to laugh at them when they try to tell us Exchange would be the way to go without actually realizing out infrastructure is larger than anything they know how to support effectivly.

    18. Re:Analogy? by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

      > That is partly because pop3 makes a poor replacement for an exchange server.

      erm ...are referring to the difficulty in porting the viri, or the added complexity in trying to be a personal information manager with vendor lockin?

      --
      boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    19. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denial. Such a terrible thing ;(.

    20. Re:Analogy? by cuban321 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exchange does much,much more than just email.

      Shared Calendars, tasks, public folders? All in the same client?

      If you compare your sendmail/postfix/whatever server "equally" to Exchange you don't know what you are talking about.

    21. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "I use Windows and Linux" don't you fucking understand?

      I'm not forced to use anything!

    22. Re:Analogy? by gonk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't know that you really know what you're talking about. For example, korea.com hosts millions of Exchange seats: korea.com

    23. Re:Analogy? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Did you just use RTF as an example with the intent of proving software interoperability.
      Worst. Example. Ever.

      RTF was designed by one of Microsoft/Corel as a least common denominator format for word processors. It doesn't have any page formatting features, no tables, no embedded images, nothing. The only application it might be useful for is email, but it doesn't even do hyperlinks.

      Legitimately, even if you're going from Abiword to Word Perfect or similar, you'll get a better document transfer using MS Word .doc format files that you will with RTF.

      The closest things that exist to standard formats for word processing are plain 7bit ASCII text, HTML, and PDF.

      I don't know how good the MS Word "Export as PDF" function is, but that's probably the only way you're going to get near-universally viewable/printable documents out of MS Word.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    24. Re:Analogy? by Epistax · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Kind of. Take me for example. I wanted to play old games with people across the internet which required an IPX network. Microsoft's home grown solution is their VPN client/esrver package which is naturally built into the entire user/security system. Anyway I wanted to use this system for gaming, just one problem: I had/have windows xp professional. This version of windows has an arbitrary limit of one VPN connection. If I want multiple VPN connections I need to buy Advanced Server. Now coming from their point of view there might be some sort of reason for this cripple ware, but coming from my point of view they want me to pay a couple thousand bucks to play old games.

      How does this make me feel? Infuriated. I have yet to find a suitable replacement (there used to be a few online services which created IPX networks but you had to play by their rules and pay monthly fees). Thank you Microsoft, for dangling the carrot in front of my face, letting me smell it, and then ripping it away. The final snub is (I am told) when installing Advanced Server it asks you how many connections you want to be able to accept.

      Ah well it really just comes down to me complaining, but it sure doesn't make me like Microsoft anymore. Remember when Notepad used to have an arbitrary file size limit? (The limit value wasn't arbitrary, the fact that they had it was) Good times.

    25. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      RTF was designed by one of Microsoft/Corel as a least common denominator format for word processors. It doesn't have any page formatting features (yes it does) , no tables (yes it does) , no embedded images (yes it does) , nothing. The only application it might be useful for is email, but it doesn't even do hyperlinks. (yes it does)

      wow. did you even try it out before you posted your stupid diatribe?

    26. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I'm an alien, you insensitive clod!

      Inhaling smoke is an unnatural act that mammals will try to avoid.

    27. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outlook keeps an RPC connection with the Exchange Server, which allows for instant new mail notification rather than polling every X minutes as with IMAP. This feature alone has sold millions of Exchange seats, scalability be damned.

      Although, Exchange is a big piggie, even compared apples-to-apples with something like Domino.

    28. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a worse case denial than I thought--this calls for an intervention. Round up the Penguin Posse--our brother needs help!

    29. Re:Analogy? by finkployd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you compare your sendmail/postfix/whatever server "equally" to Exchange you don't know what you are talking about.

      Precisely why I specifically said "the email portion of Exchange". Go back and actually read it this time, I'll wait. ...

      There are certainly other (and better) calendar, task, distributed filesystems, etc. However as you mention, they are not all in the same client. I suppose for some people it is worth the price in vendor lock in, buggy software, and security issues to have everything bundled like that. For many however it is not.

      Finkployd

    30. Re:Analogy? by rabbitx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm, sendmail and postfix are MTA's. Exchange is groupware. This being the case I would expect it to do a little more...

    31. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uhm yeah, vendor lock in because they are the only fucking vendor that even offers a solution here. This is an area that OSS has no solution, even in their usual alpha or beta quality levels. And FYI, it is pretty easy to run virus protection on an exchange server.

      In this area, not only does "free" not hold the answer, it also does not have much to say.

    32. Re:Analogy? by finkployd · · Score: 0

      Outlook keeps an RPC connection with the Exchange Server, which allows for instant new mail notification rather than polling every X minutes as with IMAP.

      Yeah, I know all Microsoft's RPC protocol. It is the Open Group's DCE RCP, sans the security. They basically "embraced" it, and made it wire compatible, but for reasons I still do not understand pulled out the part that made it a secure, authenticated RPC (which was what made DCE RPC unique to begin with).

      Frankly I think integration with Blackberries has been one of the primary selling point of Exchange lately, at least with the larger organizations I work with.

      Finkployd

    33. Re:Analogy? by finkployd · · Score: 1

      (1) I'm willing to bet their user base is significantly less active than the students and faculty of a major research institution.

      (2) Holy CRAP that is still a buttload of hardware. Especially compared to what it would take to do the same thing with open source solutions. I don't know anyone (even the most ardent MS advocate) who doesn't admit that Exchange is a massive bloated pig of a server.

      Finkployd

    34. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exchange is buggy?

      I've never had one problem with Exchange in relation to a bug. In fact the only problems I've EVER had with exchange are do to customer stupidity.

      The grandparent is right, exchange is the best software Microsoft makes.

      Also, how many exchange security holes have there been?

    35. Re:Analogy? by finkployd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are right, I was thinking of Outlook (which is required to use Exchange, at least as Exchange was intended, I know it can do pop and webmail also). So yeah the server itself doesn't have bugs and security holes, but it forces the user to deal with arguably the worst email client in history.

      Finkployd

    36. Re:Analogy? by Via_Patrino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're already addicted. First phase was piracy tolerance, now they want to charge...

      I believe they are doing what they should have done before, adjusting their prices to the reality of the local population.

      Today, MSFT charges the same for Microsoft Windows in any part of the world, either in Europe on in a developing country.

      In my country (Brazil) 200U$ is the average salary and MS Windows costs about 130U$.

      You may say with that salary people can't buy computers but a lot of them can, financing in one or two years or buying an used one. Although they're not willing to pay the high Microsoft's Tax.

      Reducing the cost of the OS, MSFT is trying to reduce piracy. Adjusting the prices to local standards the same way music and movie industries have been doing for years.

      Although they don't want the possibility of losing their current revenue. Those, mostly companies, that already buy their expensive product.

      So, to keep those companies paying high prices, they remove some (considered) essential features.

      The same essential like not clicking on a "blue E" to browse the internet, but on a "M". Whatever, some minimal changes, but enough to make the workers notice and complain to their boss (since aren't they who is paying for their intelectual inertia).

      So companies keep paying the high prices, and the population now can afford to buy their "little dose" :)

    37. Re:Analogy? by vk2 · · Score: 1

      No wonder most of my spam originates from korea :-)

      --
      No Sig for you.!
    38. Re:Analogy? by Fuzzle · · Score: 1

      Actually, by saving as .DOC you will get "near-universally viewable/printable documents out of MS Word," because nearly all (90%+) of the personal computer market runs an OS that can read them with the proper product. Hell, OSX can read them without Word even (though losing some formatting features in Textedit.app I'm sure).

    39. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      raw, "pure" RTF doesn't have any of those. what you're thinking of is ".rtf files that other RTF readers won't understand, because MS has decided to "proprietise" the format while leaving the extension the same, just like they did for .doc in the transition past Word95".

      Which retard modded this insightful?

    40. Re:Analogy? by svallarian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Is Kali not free anymore?

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
    41. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last you heard or last time you looked in your ass?

      You must be counting the servers deployed globally - any good workgroup system is placed close to the users to leave the network free for pr0n surfing...

    42. Re:Analogy? by cat_--help · · Score: 1

      That would be true if all the gamers are on the same LAN or at least have routers configured to route IPX across the different networks. The parent was referring to playing games across the Internet, so that means IP encapsulation. Thus, the need for VPN.

    43. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is your problem?

    44. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can help you fix notepad.
      http://jituonline.freeservers.com/notepa tch.html

      To fix your IPX VPN but have you tried microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web
      on
      msnews .microsoft.com

    45. Re:Analogy? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      In faact, the Thai "Eua Athorn" program, which planned to deliver a million Linux computers into the marketplace, is credited with the crack in the dam that was "one price around the world." It's no longer true, and MS is now adjusting the price in many countries.

    46. Re:Analogy? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      the notepad limit is only present on windows 95,98 and ME and is not a limit in notepad, its a limit in the windows edit control. Specificly, a 64k (I think) limit of data. I assume the limit is due to the 16-bit heritige of Windcrap 9x.

    47. Re:Analogy? by sentientbeing · · Score: 1


      So its a stripped down version of windows.

      They stripped out all the bugs, all the vulnerabilities, dancing paperclips and all the bloat.

      It now fits on a single 2.5" floppy.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    48. Re:Analogy? by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      People generally start smoking because they're young and see "everyone else doing it"

      Yeah, thats what the anti-smoking ads say. But in the real world, ask any smoker the reason they started and they'll tell you they were either curious what it was like, or because of side benefits - like in the US Navy (perhaps armed forces in general), and some workplaces, if you smoke, you get quick breaks that you wouldn't otherwise get. Anyone who tells you otherwise either has forgotten how they started, or doesn't think curiosity counts as a reason, and/or just uses the peer pressure BS as an excuse.

      Personally, I've liked the smell of smoke since day one. One night I snuck out back by myself with one of my dad's smokes, and tried it. It was delicious.

      Nowadays, being the complete asshat that I am, I try convincing people to start smoking all the time. Nobody has ever caved in, except for those who have tried tobacco before, and liked it, but those don't really count.

      Now as for inhaling smoke being an unnatural act, think back to ancient times. In order to ensure the best protection, you need fire in your cave/hut/teepee/whatever to scare/smoke off the beasts. Those who could tolerate the smoke used fire, and slept well, breathing in the fumes as necessary. Those who couldn't were more likely to get eaten by bears, or at least have their food taken away. Fire been around as long as the hills, and smoke exposure along with it.

      The pleasure of smoking is from the drug nicotine, not from smoking per se.

      One could say smoking stirs ancient instincts within us, from those long lost cavedweller days, giving us feelings of comfort. I know if I wake up on one of those nights feeling alone for whatever reason, a nice fat stogie really helps.

      In other words, I disagree. You could say the pleasure of drinking coffee comes from the caffeine, but thats not the whole story. You have the aroma, the taste, general oral stimulation, AND the main chemicals, as well as ancillary chemicals that make up the whole experience.

      For example, those of you who smoke or have smoked, and have tried chaw/dip/etc chewing tobacco, what was your reaction after finishing? Of course..."OK, now I could sure use a cigarette." Ask anyone on the patch and they'll tell you the same thing.

    49. Re:Analogy? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      There are certainly other (and better) calendar, task, distributed filesystems, etc. However as you mention, they are not all in the same client.

      However, since most of them are built around open, published, protocols (often with existing BSDL or LGPL implementations) there is nothing stopping the grandparent poster from writing an integrated client for them (or paying someone else to do it, which, for a large business, would probably still work out cheaper than the license fees for the next version of Exchange).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    50. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, how many exchange security holes have there been?

      Enough to make people recommend keeping Exchange off the internet, and putting something more secure, like Sendmail(!!!) or Postfix in front of it.

    51. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And another place where Microsofts monopoly is so effective that people don't even notice the competition.

    52. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Outlook keeps an RPC connection with the Exchange Server, which allows for instant new mail notification rather than polling every X minutes as with IMAP.

      IMAP has this in the form of the IDLE command. Unfortunately few clients seem to support this.
    53. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, projection. The problem's not with us, brother--it's with you, the addict. Once you've beaten this, you won't need these defense mechanisms anymore.

    54. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps exchange isn't buggy, but it certainly isn't secure.
      Talking in the name of warez d00dz, I would once again like to thanks the exchange team for using Web Storage System, on which flaws a huge part of the hacked irc bots are built !!!
      Talking in the name of spammers, i would like to thanks the exchange team to have enabled mail relay by default.
      And finally, talking AS an exchange consultant, i would like to thanks the exchange team for all the work they're bringing to the company i work for !

    55. Re:Analogy? by xiphy · · Score: 1

      If you have another computer with Linux you can easily make it a VPN server with arbitrary number of connections: just install a pptp server (don't forget to add the required kernel modules; there's also a PPTP HOWTO) (I havn't yet tried it with IPX games like Starcraft but for TCP/IP LAN games it worked).

    56. Re:Analogy? by sabernet · · Score: 1

      well, I was able to embed images in a properly formatted assignment saved as RTF in wordpad(wordpad) and open it up on a Mac with no issues.

      I still don't think you've actually tried the standard

      my question is which retard modded a post ending in "Which retard modded this insightful?" as Informative?

    57. Re:Analogy? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      I must have been hanging around /. too long. When I was reading your comment I thought, "RTF what? manual? article?" Then I got to the .rtf part and figured it out.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    58. Re:Analogy? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      One possible solution: A linux system using the MPPE/MPPC kernel module for Linux which actually consists of a kernel patch to get MPPE and MPPC in the linux PPP system, and a patch to pppd to support the appropriate options. This allows you to do a PPTP VPN to any Windows VPN client and in theory should support multiple protocols at once - PPP certainly supports IPX. MPPE lets you have 128 bit encryption with your VPN, although you could turn off encryption and compression. I have a Windows XP client on WiFi using this functionality to talk to my firewall system, which uses a Linksys WAP to get WiFi functionality.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    59. Re:Analogy? by mjm1231 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Those who could tolerate the smoke used fire, and slept well, breathing in the fumes as necessary. Those who couldn't were more likely to get eaten by bears, or at least have their food taken away. Fire been around as long as the hills, and smoke exposure along with it.

      Admittedly, a short term survival benefit, but the negative effects on long term health is well documented among people who still live under those conditions (smoky indoor cooking/heating fires), and are probably worse than tobacco smoking. The question of whether the act is natural or not is pointless... if the "natural" average human lifespan were found to be 35, would you be against living longer than that? The real question is do the benefits outweigh the risks. That answer is not going to be the same for everyone.

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    60. Re:Analogy? by seafortn · · Score: 1

      Amusing (and mostly related story) - when Windows for Workgroups came out (95?), my school decided to put the whole school in a workgroup (4,000 students) for printer sharing / etc. and switch to exchange from a Unix-based mail system - they asked Microsoft for advice and basically were told - "That's a bigger system than anyone has implemented so far - let us know how it works!"

    61. Re:Analogy? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      ...they'll tell you they were either curious what it was like...

      How does that differ from seeing "everyone else doing it" and wanting to try it? Curiosity is part of peer pressure (or peer dependence since pressure from peers you don't care to be like doesn't amount to much of an influence).

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    62. Re:Analogy? by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      It was almost certainly too short a period to affect us evolutionarily (I think that's a word!)
      Far before that, forest fires would've caused smoke and the animals that ran away before getting turned nice and crispy would've survived. Similarly, the thing about smoke is the bits of scrot that get stuck in your tubes, starting the coughing. Those animals that don't like coughing are less likely to try and inhale nasties.
      It's entirely correct to say that not everyone gets into fags because they were pressurized, but once they're hooked and decide they want to meet the life expectancy for their generation, it's the nicotine that keeps them hooked.
      Similarly, you might not start using Microsoft because you were forced to by work, or whatever, but if, after all that time you decide you don't like the BSODs (or moral issues, etc, for those with XP) what keeps you using the thing? The "nicotine" in Windows is the data lock-in.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    63. Re:Analogy? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I've got to say that this is the funniest thread I've seen here in a long time. Of course, it could just be the work of one AC....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    64. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think integration with Blackberries has been one of the primary selling point of Exchange lately
      Blackberries? Exchange is more like dingleberries.
    65. Re:Analogy? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Filesystems are part of the operating system.

      Calendaring and task management should be
      integrated, for usability, but integrating
      mail with Calendaring is a *bad idea*, as
      Outlook quite adequately demonstrates. What
      you want in this case is not integration, but
      *interoperation*.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    66. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a limit is comprehensible in an edit control. What isn't comprehensible is why they then just used this crippled control for their basic text editor, instead of providing one which could handle files of a size people needed.

      Wordpad wasn't a usable solution, because of the way it forced you to confirm, every fucking time you saved, that yes you really did want to save as plain text!

    67. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the one playing the therapist--I am not the other guy. Glad you enjoyed it :).

    68. Re:Analogy? by svallarian · · Score: 1

      Dear ignorant mod,
      Kali is an old school ipx over ip emulation software that used to be the BEST back in the day for War II.

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
    69. Re:Analogy? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Printing a PDF, exactly as intended:
      1.) Probably more than 95% of actively used personal computers either have a PDF viewer installed or could have one installed at no cost. All PDF viewers will print a PDF file perfectly.

      Printing a Microsoft Word .doc file:
      1.) How many machines Microsoft Word installed, or can install it at no cost. 50%? Less?
      2.) Now remember that .doc files are not 100% backwards or forwards compatible. You'll probably do fine going between Word 2000 for Windows and Word XP for Windows, as long as you don't use any XP specific features, but Word XP definately won't interoperate with Word '97 well enough for them to print 100% the same on a complex document.
      -- For simple documents this doesn't matter, but on the other hand, for simple documents you could have exported to ASCII text and then recreated the formatting later.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  3. That's just the thing.... by jwcorder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They removed English from the OS for piracy concerns. Something about that stat 75% of all Asian installs were stolen.

    --
    http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    1. Re:That's just the thing.... by pezpunk · · Score: 5, Funny

      well, if the stripped out features include Windows Media Player, Windows Messaging, MSN, and all that other crap i spend my first half hour deleting after a clean install, then it might just be worth it to learn Thai ...

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    2. Re:That's just the thing.... by Yaa+101 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sahwaht Dee Krahb...

      The most difficult things in the thai language that I remember are intonation when speaking, the Thai keep smiling friendly however in most cases... :-)
      The second is the lack of spaces between the words which makes reading quite hard when starting as beginning learners have difficulties to see where words end.
      The Thai alphabeth is not that hard to learn and the grammar is not more difficult than my own language the Dutch one, which is grammar hell.

    3. Re:That's just the thing.... by SyntheticTruth · · Score: 1


      Being married to a Thai wife, that is easier said than done. As much as English sucks sometimes, at least "good" means "good" no matter how you pronounce it. About the only word I know I get right is "ting tong" which means silly. Tonal langauges are ting tong.

    4. Re:That's just the thing.... by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
      They removed English from the OS for piracy concerns.

      Do you have a source for this information?

      I found this article that says: "Windows XP Starter Edition will be available in Thailand by September and Malaysia late this year, a Microsoft spokesman told Bloomberg news agency yesterday." In Malaysia, the national language Bahasa uses the Roman alphabet. Many of the Chinese and Indian minorities speak better English than Bahasa. So English is essential in Malaysia; even if they've tried to cripple it the Malaysian XP should be useable by an English speaker.

    5. Re:That's just the thing.... by jwcorder · · Score: 5, Funny
      If it takes you 30 mins to uncheck three boxes, then I think there is going to be a problem learning that second language.

      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    6. Re:That's just the thing.... by jwcorder · · Score: 1

      http://asia.cnet.com/newstech/systems/0,39001153,3 9136847,00.htm

      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    7. Re:That's just the thing.... by jwcorder · · Score: 1
      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    8. Re:That's just the thing.... by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      Umm you see that's the problem... Most people think that these things ARE windows.

      I put someone on a Linux computer and they we're lost until I showed theme Kopete(sp) and said it was a different look for MSN... they were happy and used my linux computer for about 5 hours.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    9. Re:That's just the thing.... by vrt3 · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by 'removed English from the OS'? That sounds like Windows XP contains English even if it is meant for other languages, but I didn't think that's the case. I run a Dutch version, and there is no English in it.

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
    10. Re:That's just the thing.... by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Ah, Malaysia...
      Piracy...
      When I visited Malaysia a couple of years ago, they had, in Kuala Lumpur (the capital), a three stage building like a shopping mall, with every shop selling pirate software. You could get almost anything for the equivelent of under GB *1.00. And this was before CD-Rs were widely used. I can't believe anyone would release software there to prevent it being pirated.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    11. Re:That's just the thing.... by Viceice · · Score: 1

      They can. The damand for original online mutiplayer games are very strong. Basicly everything Blizzard puts out is booked solid even before the ship that brings it in leaves port of origin.

      Also we have a start up online gaming firm that is doing quite well.

      That and the commercial use of pirated software is a big no-no. It's only home users that buy pirated and considering that the PC penetration rate for Malaysian households is only 15%, it's not a big loss compared to commercial piracy.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    12. Re:That's just the thing.... by Viceice · · Score: 1

      Well, MS didn't win in Malaysia. According to this article, Linux out sold Windows about 7 to 3 in the PC Gemilang project mention in the article.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    13. Re:That's just the thing.... by jalsk · · Score: 1

      yeah, but just unchecking those three boxes only removes the links to the programs, it doesn't actually remove the programs.

    14. Re:That's just the thing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Being married to a Thai wife
      How much was the postage?
  4. LOL by polyp2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that's rather amusing. Its almost as if they have given it a crap name so that people will go the extra mile and pay for the addition of the extra parts.

    What about Windows XP Binner Edition ?

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Howabout "Windows XP Trailer Park Edition" ?

    2. Re:LOL by JohnFromCanada · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Howabout Windows XP Trailer Park Edition?"

      If it comes with a bottle of Johnny Walker, a pack of smokes and Bubbles does the install I want in.

    3. Re:LOL by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is that they intend to compete against full-featured Linux by selling a product with _less_ functions than what they usually sell...

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    4. Re:LOL by Kenshin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, but every error dialog box will say something like "This Fuckin' Piece of Shit Doesn't Work!", it will completely screw up all complicated technical words like Ricky does, and the BSOD will now the the "Shit Storm of Death".

      Plus, you'll end up going to jail once a year.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    5. Re:LOL by westlake · · Score: 1

      The starter edition includes both Thai localized XP and Office for $38 US. That pretty well sums up what most people would want from an entry level O/S distribution.

    6. Re:LOL by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      That would be all of them.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    7. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shutdown button actually says:

      Martha, breakout the wheels. we're movin!

    8. Re:LOL by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 1

      Looks like Microsoft is completely entrenched in the far east, pirate versions or not. Try digging up web logs in places like Korea, Japan, New Zealand. Not unusual to see 70% MSIE6, 20% MSIE5, 10% MSIE4, 0.0002% "other".

      Also, although bit off topic, thats probably why worldwide web stats show 1% "other", and stats local to places like US and Germany go from 4%-20% There are alot of countries out there that have yet to develop a healthy population of computer-literate power users and nerds.

    9. Re:LOL by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      No, you're looking for Windaz Ecks Pee (Coming soon, until then, use Windaz Tew Thowsand.

    10. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Someone else has actually heard of TPB? Best show ever. Even if it is Canadian... :)

    11. Re:LOL by H09N0X10U5 · · Score: 0
      Binner
      ROFLMAO! I haven't heard that in ages. Is it based on a claimant - charva architecture?
      --
      The post anonymously option you are [not] attempting to use is one that isn't available to your user.
  5. starter? by aquishix · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Starter Edition: We'll get you started on Microsoft so that you'll become just another piglet sucking on the tit of one of the largest corporations in history. Get Starter, click the Start button, and Start giving us your money.

    --
    - I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. [strain #2] Thank you
  6. Starter Edition. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is anybody else making the connection between "starter" and "free first rock of crack", but the next is $x"?

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:Starter Edition. by Otter · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Believe me, they already all have Windows. It's more like "As long as every last one of you is pirating our software anyway, anything we can get you to pay for is a win for us."

      There was (is?) a whole floor of the Mah Boon Krong department store in Bangkok for warez CD's. (Fortunately, the attitude towards payment cuts both ways there -- the first time in the MBK cafeteria, I took food from a bunch of vendors and walked off to the cashier to pay. They all waved and yelled and I waved back. Turns out you need to pay the vendors individually. Took a bit of backtracking and apologizing, but they all were content to just laugh their heads at an even dumber-than-usual farang.)

    2. Re:Starter Edition. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      "As long as every last one of you is pirating our software anyway, anything we can get you to pay for is a win for us."

      But that situation is true in many countries. Only in Thailand, when the governement sponsored a Linux distribution to come preinstalled on cheap PCs, did MS take such action. MS wants to have 100% of every market, and pirated MS is better than no MS, in the long term it creates a legitimate market. And they really don't want to cut their list prices in one country. For one thing, they've been moving towards a single install world wide, and the languages are an option -- back in Win 3, for instance, in the Chinese edition almost every file was different. Now almost every file is the same. So grey market imports of a cheap edtion into the first world are a risk, some countries' legislation makes these impossible to stop (others more under the corporate thumb make them illegal).

    3. Re:Starter Edition. by Colonel+Blimp · · Score: 1

      Pantip Plaza and Hollywood City are also great places for bootlegs. Pantip is 5 stories of hardware and bootleg. No one in Thailand is gonna buy this.

    4. Re:Starter Edition. by dougw · · Score: 1

      I visited Chiang Mai and Bangkok for two weeks in early 2002. In perhaps 3 or 4 of 10, the computers were running Linux.

  7. Faux Pas! by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surely that implies all other editions are non-starters?

    1. Re:Faux Pas! by bgeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      No no, the other editions are re-starters. As in every time you install anything.

    2. Re:Faux Pas! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You haven't used XP, have you? Both XP and 2k were great about restarting. And not needing to when you install things.

      Some things require reboots (Like Direct X), but that's because they modify files currently in use.

      Oh wait, this is /. where blind attacks against the "Evil" Microsoft gets you rewarded.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:Faux Pas! by EnsilZah · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's the joke that goes:
      "Windows has detected you have moved your mouse, would you like to restart for the changes to take place?"

    4. Re:Faux Pas! by bgeer · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I use 2K/XP nearly every day unfortunately, and virtually every time I install something it asks me to reboot. Whether it's InstallShield's problem or Windows's problem is irrelevant.

      Also, your argument about DirectX is laughable. You don't even have to restart Linux to upgrade LIBC! ***LIBC***! Even the package manager that is actually upgrading libc is using libc! And it works just fine. This has been true since ELF was introduced way back in what '96 or so?

      The whole reason behind the rebooting problem is the registry, and if MS gets rid of it I'll gladly stop making fun of it. Until then you and the rest of the MS-defender crowd will just have to keep stretching your credibility trying to defend it.

    5. Re:Faux Pas! by aichpvee · · Score: 0

      Why would installing graphics and sound libraries or video drivers require a reboot? Are you guys fucking stupid? And even in XP there are tons of programs that make you reboot after installing, and often times without telling you they are going to first or giving you a chance to reboot manually.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    6. Re:Faux Pas! by TaintedShadow · · Score: 1

      and in 2k3 you have to give a reason for your reboot or it won't let

    7. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      > The whole reason behind the rebooting problem is the registry, and if MS gets rid of it I'll gladly stop making fun of it. Until then you and the rest of the MS-defender crowd will just have to keep stretching your credibility trying to defend it.

      Almost; the reason is in-use files; Windows can't update them in place the way Linux can, a Windows installer needs exclusive access to files it wants to overwrite. So, an installer makes a series of xxx.dll.1 or xxx.exe.1 or whatever.1 files for each in-use file, then writes a batch file that runs the next time the OS boots. Those .1 files are renamed to their intended targets, and then the OS finishes its startup.

      Cheesy, but it works.

    8. Re:Faux Pas! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Programs asking for it and programs needing it are two different things. Almost every program asks for a reboot, but you don't need to.

      I've never seen one program just reboot when it was done. Can you name a few?

      If you don't like what some programs do, why not find something from another company?

      Or maybe you'd rather use Linux. It's personal preferance.

      I use what I like and what works. Until it stops working or until it fills itself with DRM, I'll probably keep using it. I'm sure that goes for almost everybody else who uses Windows, too.



      And lets keep this a civil discussion and leave the name calling elsewhere, ok?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    9. Re:Faux Pas! by smurf975 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand this should be only true for system files. Shared application binaries should just be unloaded, updated and reloaded. Or if it added something to the path. But a reboot is not needed for that either.

      In my experience its mostly bad installers that ask you to reboot. 99% of the times when it asks you to reboot you can just say no and use the application straight away.

      --
      -- I don't buy it, I grow it.
    10. Re:Faux Pas! by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nearly every time you install something? Now, by "something", are you referring to system updates, or are you including applications in there?

      I can't remember the last time I had to reboot because I installed an application in Windows. Funnily enough, at work the other day I installed a small application on an OSX machine and it asked me to reboot. If I tried to run the application without rebooting, it crashed the machine.

    11. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You don't even have to restart Linux to upgrade LIBC! ***LIBC***! Even the package manager that is actually upgrading libc is using libc! And it works just fine.

      Fool - ***LIBC*** is a static library.
      The package manager which is upgrading libc, has
      a copy of the libc object files it needs inside
      it's binary. It's not using the installed
      ***LIBC***.

    12. Re:Faux Pas! by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "The whole reason behind the rebooting problem is the registry, and if MS gets rid of it I'll gladly stop making fun of it. Until then you and the rest of the MS-defender crowd will just have to keep stretching your credibility trying to defend it."

      No, it's not. The registry is simply another filesystem, just like /etc in UNIX.

      The reason you need to reboot is that the software is replacing system DLLs that are loaded into memory. Windows is not flexible enough to reload those DLLs without rebooting.

      Oh, and by the way, 95% of the time, you *don't have to* reboot, even when it says so. Most installers just tell you to reboot because it was common practice in the Windows 95 era.

      Moreover, some installers are just lazy. They install system services but don't start them, forcing you to reboot.

      "The whole reason behind the rebooting problem is the registry, and if MS gets rid of it I'll gladly stop making fun of it. Until then you and the rest of the MS-defender crowd will just have to keep stretching your credibility trying to defend it."

      That's funny, because my arguments for using Windows have nothing to do with the fact that "I don't have to reboot". I'm just glad to be running an OS where the whole hardware issue isn't a massive clusterfuck. I don't want to have to recompile my fucking kernel to install a 3D driver. I don't want to have to get different binary modules for each kernel revision. I don't want to have to fuck with cardmgr to get my wireless card to work. I don't want to spend five fucking hours making my USB WiFi dongle work.

      Oh, and I don't want to have to get special packages for my distro. And I don't want to have to compile software from source. And I don't want to limit myself to some repository of often-outdated packages.

      Today, there are only two operating systems that can do this: Windows and Mac OS.

      I have a managed Linux server. For this, Linux is great. It does what it needs to do without the expense of commercial software (of course, it did take me five fucking hours to get a damn mail server running).

      But Linux on my desktop? Sorry, it's just not worth it. Even on my paltry salary, the time I would spend getting my (farily standard) hardware working with any Linux distro is simply not worth it.

    13. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, but the difference is you have to waste an afternoon recompiling everything.

      and wow, what a great game it would be, if you manage to get your CDrom working or your damn sound card working in linux ... stuff that stopped being a problem for windows 10 years ago.

    14. Re:Faux Pas! by omicronish · · Score: 1

      The whole reason behind the rebooting problem is the registry, and if MS gets rid of it I'll gladly stop making fun of it. Until then you and the rest of the MS-defender crowd will just have to keep stretching your credibility trying to defend it.

      I don't believe so. The rebooting problem is because you can't replace files that are in use on Windows, while on Linux you can.

    15. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fool - ***LIBC*** is a static library.
      The package manager which is upgrading libc, has
      a copy of the libc object files it needs inside
      it's binary. It's not using the installed
      ***LIBC***.

      Wrong. libc can be both dynamic and static, and upgrading libc does not affect either dynamically-linked or statically-linked applications. Under GNU/Linux, dynamic libraries can be upgraded while being used, for the same reason that files can be removed while open: the filesystem does not remove the old file until its reference count is zero, and references include both hardlinks and programs with the file open.
    16. Re:Faux Pas! by fwitness · · Score: 1

      I've actually had that happen before. I never installed the drivers for my touchpad on my laptop (I use a usb mouse). A couple days after my install was finished, I accidentally pressed one of the touchpad buttons and lo and behold...

      "New Hardware Found!"

      And yes, I did have to reboot. Now my cursor jumps randomly whenever I glide over the pad. Yay.

      --
      -- I have fans? Wow.
    17. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This was actually explained not long ago in somebody's blog, but I can't find it right now so I'll paraphrase.

      The first problem is in-use file.

      On Unix you can delete a file that's in-use and replace it. The actual storage isn't freed until the last handle is closed. On Windows, it doesn't work that way. Open handles don't keep storage around, so you can only rename the file to replace it (except on Win9x). But you can replace it, so that's only part of the problem. (for executable files, at least on Windows, you must keep the original file around while it's loaded for paging)

      The other problem is dependencies between in-use files.

      Suppose you have a program A, which uses DLLs B and C, and each of B and C use DLL D:
      A -> B -> D
      A -> C -> D
      Now say A has loaded B, and in the process D, but has not yet loaded C. You come by and update all of the files, A, B, C, and D. Program A is still using the old versions of A, B, and D, because you can't guarantee that the old data structures will still work. It's never safe to swap out a running program in memory, even in Unix.

      Now A comes across something that requires loading DLL C. C needs D, but D is already loaded in A's address space, so Windows will use the existing copy. And now you have a new version of C, expecting a new version of D (since you updated them at the same time), but using the old version. Loading the new D for the new C would have other problems, perhaps more difficult to debug.

      If your programmers and users are all 100% clueful, you can avoid this problem (ie, make sure C will work with the older D), but Windows doesn't have this luxury.

      The whole reason behind the rebooting problem is the registry

      The only case where this might be so is for programs that read their settings once and forget about it. I don't think there's a solution for that that depends on how settings are stored.

      In fact, the registry might be better for this problem, since you can ask for notifications when a section of the registry changes. Unix typicially uses SIG_HUP, which is just manual change notification.

      And I don't know what you've been installing, but 90+% of the installs I see do not require reboots.

    18. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason you need to reboot is that the software is replacing system DLLs that are loaded into memory. Windows is not flexible enough to reload those DLLs without rebooting.

      In the sense that this is true, nothing is that flexible.

      You can't replace a DLL in memory, because it will have data structure allocated to it, and you don't know that the old data structures will work in the new version of the DLL. If you're going to allow that, you need to have a function in the DLL to update in-memory structures. This may make sense for some applications, but usually it's not worth the trouble.

      But Windows doesn't really need to reboot to update those DLLs. You just need to unload every loaded copy and load them again after the update. That's not terribly easy to automate in a multitasking environment, and the user won't have a clue which things need restarting. (esp. if that includes services)

    19. Re:Faux Pas! by idiot900 · · Score: 1

      I don't want to have to recompile my fucking kernel to install a 3D driver. I don't want to have to get different binary modules for each kernel revision.

      Then don't. Use the kernel supplied by your distro, with all the modules already compiled.

      I don't want to have to fuck with cardmgr to get my wireless card to work. I don't want to spend five fucking hours making my USB WiFi dongle work.

      OK, these I have no answer to. Anybody?

    20. Re:Faux Pas! by jwcorder · · Score: 1
      *Stands and cheers loudly*

      This is the first time I have ever seen someone get ripped for saying something negative about Windows. Somewhere in a room in Seattle, Bill Gates just shed a tear.

      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    21. Re:Faux Pas! by vampyre78 · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the obligatory "I'm slowing down until you restart me" bug that has so far infected every windows install i've ever seen.

    22. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the problem is in the file locking, or rather Linux's lack thereof. Windows does not permit a library in use to be deleted. You can rename it, since the lock still applies to the now renamed file, but you can't delete it. Linux lets you just switch it out, not caring that other apps are currently using the library that may or may not need to dip back into the file to continue functioning and then explode, or you upgrade a lib because of a security vulnerability and forget to restart daemons or whatever and they remain vulnerable.

      But that's fine, show your ignorance and spread your FUD. Blaming the registry? It's not lots of problems, but this ain't one of them. Sweeping changes to the registry are immediate to every application that reads them. Making registry changes does not require restarting the OS no more than changing a conf file requires that you reboot Linux.

    23. Re:Faux Pas! by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      That is quite a laughable suggestion. 3D video drivers are the worst offenders on this count, neither of the "BIG" makers (ATI & Nvidia) have usable open source drivers that support direct rendering. The only open source option is not included in any standard distro kernel that I have heard of and getting it to work requires minimally two compiles, 1 reboot, 4 files renamed, and 1 config file manually edited.....

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    24. Re:Faux Pas! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      You know, you found the solution to your own problem:
      Today, there are only two operating systems that can do this: Windows and Mac OS.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    25. Re:Faux Pas! by Ghostx13 · · Score: 1

      Your arguments are pretty weak and stem mostly from lack of experiance/ignorance (no, I'm not insulting you, I'm just saying your not informed about somethings)

      First off, yes hardware under Linux/BSD is not as easy as it is under windows. Mostly this is because of lack of vendor support. However, every distro has a hardware compatability list. If your not using hardware that is compatable, then it's your own fault.

      Second, I don't know what 3D driver your talking about, but I've installed the nVidia 3D driver on redhat and freebsd 5. Neither were much work. 15 mins max. No need for re-compiling on the linux box and the modules I needed in the freebsd kernel were dynamically loaded.

      Third, there is no reason for a 5 hour install of ANY mail server on ANY OS. This can only be attributed to, again, lack of experiace or ignorance.

    26. Re:Faux Pas! by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Both XP and 2k were great about restarting. And not needing to when you install things
      At least five times in the last three hours with one machine which is functioning correctly. This afternoon I've rebooted a laptop with XP quite a few times during the process of giving it a new hard drive with the old image. Meanwhile the sun in the other room only needs to be powered off once if you put in another drive, and otherwise gets powered off when electricians need to do something on that circuit.

      Just because you don't have to reboot as many times as you do with Win95 doesn't mean that it is good, just that it is better than Win95.

      On the other hand, with recent versions of NT like XP etc, you don't need to reboot anymore when you lose the shell - which means you can get uptimes spanning weeks.

    27. Re:Faux Pas! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      HOW is the registry causing reboots? And the fact is that it does matter whether it's InstallShield's or Windows' problem. Because people like you will say "oh, look, Windows needs to reboot all the time," when it really doesn't.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    28. Re:Faux Pas! by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Some things require reboots (Like Direct X), but that's because they modify files currently in use.

      No, they do that because microsoft want you to. There's a "corporate" directx install (which costs money of course) that doesn't require a reboot.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    29. Re:Faux Pas! by homesteader · · Score: 1

      How about Internet Explorer 6? It reboots when complete without even prompting you. How about changing a computer's name, or joining a new domain? Reboot. Change pagefile size. Reboot. Change max registry size. Reboot. How about an .msi based install fails ungracefully, and then you want to install some other .msi based install, reboot. Apply Blaster patch. Reboot. Apply Sasser patch. Reboot.

      It would be true to say XP/2k are better about it than Win9x, but that's not much of a complement.

      Remember, /. isn't just for *nix hacks, the unfortunate Windows admins slum here too.

    30. Re:Faux Pas! by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      You haven't used XP, have you? Both XP and 2k were great about restarting. And not needing to when you install things.

      I just installed Windows XP Home edition, ran Windows Update (installing only the recommended security updates) and installed the drivers that came with the motherboard. Sounds simple, right? It took me SIX FUCKING HOURS (not least because the first time it insisted on calling the system drive H:, and you can't change the system drive letter without reinstalling Windows) and I had to reboot FIFTEEN FUCKING TIMES, so don't talk to me about XP "not needing reboots anymore"...

    31. Re:Faux Pas! by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Like getting hardware working in Windows is easy ?

      right.

      Think again, really, think about it.

      Most of the time it works fine, just like that precompiled kernel of your Linux Desktop distribution.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    32. Re:Faux Pas! by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      "First off, yes hardware under Linux/BSD is not as easy as it is under windows. "

      Actual, in just my experience, it's been easier than windows this last year or so. I have usualy just installed the distro,rebooted once. That's it everything works. This has been true for me since mandrake shipped a version that would install (I used to get divide by zero errors on three different machines with two different major version numbers).
      Before that I had to dig a bit and find out what resolutions and refresh rates and irq's and ports, and so on were on a specific machine.
      Though I suppose if you do have some odd hardware linux don't recognize off the bat it could be a pain bewcause most hardware vendors don't ship with linux drivers.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    33. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a noobie to linux, and I had no problems with my hardware when I installed RH9. It picked up my video, Network, sound cards, and my USB mouse with no problems.

      When I installed XP Pro on my other computer I had to uninstall the sound card drivers three times to get it to work and now it only works 1 out of every 2 start ups.

    34. Re:Faux Pas! by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      The last time I had to reboot after installing something that was just an application and not something critical on XP was... wait for it...

      The demo of Impossible Creatures.

      Yeah, the game made by Relic and Microsoft.

      I grinned at the irony for about 20 minutes.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    35. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried that the last time I needed to reinstall some software. Uninstalled it - please reboot. Clicked no. Installed the software again.

      It worked fine. Untill I actually rebootet that is, because then half the DLLs were missing.

    36. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow you are so full of fecies you stink.

      EVERY single app we use at work (except for one small app) requires a reboot for it to work properly.

      Oh and did we forget about CD burning software? REBOOT.
      Oh we forgot about Office.... REBOOT

      oh and the fact that windows cant install most security patches without a REBOOT REBOOT REBOOT REBOOT....

      maybe when you support a few hundred desktops instead of yours at home you might understand how windows really works.

      and dont get me started about how retarted the domain model is and Active directory is. Oh it's rock solid??? disconnect from the PDC and BDC now watch as people try to print or use the fileserver....

      oops! we cant authinticate you! YOU ARE DEAD.

      ms - how pissed off do you want to get today?

    37. Re:Faux Pas! by bob670 · · Score: 1

      I looked at your user name, then read your post, and now I know what you are doing here. You are one of the many forum/newsgroup plants MS sends out to spread additional FUD.

    38. Re:Faux Pas! by just_von · · Score: 1

      I think what you are saying is that you like an OS that allow's you to be lazy. That's fine, i guess, but the extra work you have to do with linux sure makes you feel a lot better when it's over with.

    39. Re:Faux Pas! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty tired of Windows 2000 asking me to reboot when changing the IP. I'm not sure if it only does that when you change from DHCP to a specified IP but it really pisses me off. This is something that Unix systems have done without a reboot about as long as there have been Unix systems and Microsoft who has allegedly stolen their stack from BSD (and since rewritten most to all of it, also allegedly) still cannot get right.

      The problem with XP is not the registry, it is the way it handles file locking. Changes to the registry tend to be made immediately and work fine. Stop blaming your problems on the registry, it is not as hard to work with as you imagine and not substantially more of a pain in the ass than having the configuration files for everything on your system spread out all over creation. The problem is Windows NT's file locking semantics which basically mean that it is not possible to replace a running file. Whether you are using ELF or a.out you can delete a file on a Unix system which is in use, and it will unlink it, but the file is still open in memory and you can still attach to the shared object. Laying down a new file with the new filename means that requests to the old filehandle will alter the old (unlinked) file until all references to that filehandle are closed, and any new requests will go through the filesystem and get a new filehandle. THIS is the real reason you can do rolling upgrades on Unix systems for anything but the kernel.

      The registry works fine. It's slow and can be annoying but in general it does the things it's supposed to. Nothing wrong with Windows can be blamed on the registry, except for Windows' amazing ability to overflow the registry quota even when you crank it way up. Now, I just crank it way, way up.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    40. Re:Faux Pas! by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      I think this may be just a cleverly disguised troll. Usually it goes:
      1. Linux fanatic rips on "constant" BSOD/crashes in Windows. (insightful)
      2. Current Windows user informs them that current versions of Windows don't do that. (informative)
      3. ???
      4. Profit. (ok, sorry couldn't resist.)

      In this case, the criticism is valid. Windows XP still does need to reboot on just about anything you install, but someone saw a chance to be modded insightful by using the usual formula of correcting Windows critiques.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    41. Re:Faux Pas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm pretty tired of Windows 2000 asking me to reboot when changing the IP


      uh not only does 2000 not prompt you to reboot after changing the IP, but with SP6 NT4 doesn't either. get a brain, moran.
    42. Re:Faux Pas! by H09N0X10U5 · · Score: 0
      The whole reason behind the rebooting problem is the registry
      Now that was a smart idea. Put all the important information in one file so if it gets broken, the system's hosed, and put in a binary format so you haven't even got a hope in hell of fixing it if (oops, when) it does go pear shaped.
      --
      The post anonymously option you are [not] attempting to use is one that isn't available to your user.
    43. Re:Faux Pas! by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      I think the point is, that windows should have this functionality, since UNIX has had it for ages. Deleting an in-use file doesn't free the space until the last handle on the file disappears, but it does free the filename.

      When I first heard of Linux I thought how cool it would be if the bootloader let you dump out of the kernel, and reload the new one, without resetting the hardware/bios. Then I heard about OpenFirmware. (Alpha, Sun, Mac, etc)

      I must say though, the most recent "direct x security patch" didn't make me reboot my windows computer, which surprised me greatly. I think one major problem is, say, video drivers that need a reboot. I bet most users who are upgrading their video drivers are doing so because a game told them to, etc. They would blindly click OK to any box that pops up and miss the "We need to shutdown video for up to a minute while these drivers install and reinitialize, hold on..." and wonder why their screen went blank. CTR+ALT+DEL? Nothing. Reset switch? Worked like a charm. To the average user video isn't a seperate service, it isn't even a serperate idea.

    44. Re:Faux Pas! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      I suppose there should be a rather simple solution to the A->B->D, A->C->D problem, when a newer version of C is loaded, when an older version of D is already loaded in the address space.

      Windows should keep track, in a graph of some sort, the relationships between all DLLs. This would also help with the problems created by installing and uninstalling various software.

      When a newer version of a DLL is installed, the dependancy graph could be analyzed to figure out if any running program is affected. If so, the OS could notify the user to shut down the program first, or offer the option of letting all installation changes remain "hidden" until the next reboot.

    45. Re:Faux Pas! by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Actually, in my expreience in actually creating installsheild/wise install (et al) setup programs, the "restart computer" dialog at the end is only an option. It's not mandatory.

      I can usually simply start the program and use it straight away - except certain programs which like, need to get really low level into the OS to do stuff, and apps like some virus scanners, some firewalls and things like pcanywhere... oh yeah, and vmware... stuff like that :)

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  8. $38? by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How long till we start seeing spam for "Windows/Office, just $40!!", after all, Microsoft can't prevent the reimportation of their product. Of course, if it's all written in Thai, there won't be much benefit.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:$38? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Informative

      They already have that - if you acquire them under an academic license it costs a fraction of the retail price... selling them on is tricky (the licence wouldn't actually be valid unless you were an educational establishment) but the spam never mentions that little wrinkle.

    2. Re:$38? by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      Office is 100, but there ain't any discount on WinXP home.

      --
      I do security
    3. Re:$38? by irokitt · · Score: 4, Funny
      They could always run it through Babelfish.

      "This program has executed a illegal operation.
      If the problem insists, it comes in contact with the salesman of program."
      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    4. Re:$38? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      That's ofcourse not a problem if you don't believe EULAs are legally binding.

    5. Re:$38? by suyashs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Windows/Office is already $40 in most of the US, becuase that's the average price of a broadband connection! P.S. I don't condone piracy!

      --
      http://chrono.posterous.com/
    6. Re:$38? by bircho · · Score: 1

      I wish i had mod points now.

      Think about this: Would you buy a striped down Windows or just pick a pirated professional version from your neighboor? See why this is NOT going to work?

      Another problem: $38 dollars is a lot of money in some contries. Where i live i could go 20 times to the movies with $40.

      So don't expect this you are save any money when longhorn come out. This is not going to work...

    7. Re:$38? by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Office is 150.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    8. Re:$38? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my boss (the IT director at our small non-profit) replied to one of those emails. he was surprised when his $30 XP Pro and Office XP Pro discs shipped from russia.

      i told him it was a waste of money, i already had a copy that i had downloaded...

    9. Re:$38? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -- What is Dennis saying there, man? Is Dennis saying that all Asians are gay?! Or, is he saying that all gays are Asian??

  9. And the difference is? by rms_nz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good to see good journalism is going out the door - it would be nice for it to mention what makes it "cut-down".

    I know it says "As part of the deal, Microsoft also stripped out some unspecified features from both products" but surely there must be more details available than that?

    1. Re:And the difference is? by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 2, Funny

      it would be nice for it to mention what makes it "cut-down".

      I believe they removed just about everything from the \WINDOWS directory. ;-)

    2. Re:And the difference is? by E_elven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I don't get is that they had to do a lot of rewriting to make this version, as a complete afterthought. So they do more development and yet they charge less than the original.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    3. Re:And the difference is? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      What I don't get is that they had to do a lot of rewriting to make this version, as a complete afterthought. So they do more development and yet they charge less than the original.

      I doubt it was a lot. But they don;t want something taht could be sold back to the first world.

    4. Re:And the difference is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Good to see good journalism is going out the door

      Where in the fuck have you been for the last 20 goddam years?

  10. Cut-rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Still not as cheap as *nix :) I'd like to see what the "unspecified" features they chopped out were.

    1. Re:Cut-rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still not as cheap as *nix :)

      Yup, Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, and the like are free. The hardware is kind of expensive, though.

      Hey, wait a minute...

    2. Re:Cut-rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it supports programs that *nix doesn't :)

      Linux is a good choice for some but not for all! As soon as people realize that lots of progress will be made with getting a larger Linux userbase.

    3. Re:Cut-rate? by binkzz · · Score: 1
      I'd like to see what the "unspecified" features they chopped out were.

      I bet it's windows media player and internet explorer, if only to piss the EC off.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    4. Re:Cut-rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace some with "most".
      Better yet replace the first Linux with Windows.

      Most all Windows applications have a Linux counterpart however almost nobody bothers to actually check before saying it's not there.
      So far every time somebodys said an app dosen't exist for Linux I've found it with a simple look at freshmeat.
      However there have been applications I did need that didn't have a Linux version. Often there wasn't a Windows version eather. Thats where the CP/M and C64 emulation comes in handy.

      But after a few years of advocating Linux I have run accrost a large number of users whom I'm absolutly convenced should use Windows and a smaller batch for whom Windows is a bad choice but available alterntives (Linux, MacOs) are worse.

      But converting users who really need Windows to Linux is like converting mass trassit busses to compact cars. There is absolutly no way to make it work and you shouldn't try.

      The real trick is to convence the avrage user to give Linux a try.
      In spite of what is clamed it's not that the avrage user isn't familure with computers that's making Windows puke but the avrage user IS familure with computer but only enough to get into trubble.

      Windows pukes becouse of the garbage installed and uninstalled, the tweeks, the alterations. If you don't mess with it Windows runs pritty smoothly.
      But the avrage user is a "power user" in Linux we call them "hackers".

      But they aren't experts and don't know when they are being feed a line. Marketting and real advice get mixed up and the "experts" that the avrage user can talk to (the ones that don't charge $7 an hour just to answer questions and don't have 50 certs in 5 diffrent platforms) don't know anything more than the marketting hype when it comes to Linux.

      So they think Linux is hard.
      They think Linux is impossable for them.
      They think people like you and me grind our own silicon wafers in the kitchen.

      Reality check. Most Linux users ARE avrage users. Not experts. We don't know more than anyone else. The REAL experts can clean up Windows and make it run the way it should. The real experts can get the same preformence out of Microsoft products the rest of us can only find in Linux.
      The real experts don't need Linux.

    5. Re:Cut-rate? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Replace some with "most". Better yet replace the first Linux with Windows.

      So it goes from "Linux is a good choice for some but not for all!" to "Windows is good for most but not all!"

      That's the exact thing it said before.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  11. starter edition? by Garion+Maki · · Score: 2, Funny

    isn't windows xp a starter edition on it's own?
    a tour at the start, allot of helpfiles and all the dangerous files hidden, so that you can't mess mutch up...

    I wonder if they couldent have thought of a more fitting name for a stripped down version, like windows lite or so, since now it seems that windows normal is for the pro's ;)

    --
    All indicators show that the human race is selectively breeding itself for stupidity.
    1. Re:starter edition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a tour at the start, allot of helpfiles . . . ."

      That tour at the start needs to guide you to a dictionary or an English class.

    2. Re:starter edition? by Garion+Maki · · Score: 1

      not everybady is born in a english speaking country ;)

      --
      All indicators show that the human race is selectively breeding itself for stupidity.
  12. New hit song by MS.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    One night in Bangkok makes Bill Gates humble
    Not much between despair and ecstasy
    One night in Bangkok and Microsoft tumble
    Can't be too careful with your company
    I can feel the devil walking next to me

    1. Re:New hit song by MS.. by momerath2003 · · Score: 3, Informative

      In case anyone doesn't know, the parent is spoofing a song by Murray Head entitled One Night in Bangkok.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    2. Re:New hit song by MS.. by nilenico · · Score: 1

      ...from the musical "Chess", by Bjørn and Benny (I get their last names mixed up) from Abba. Big hit in the West End.

      --
      .sig? No.
    3. Re:New hit song by MS.. by sita · · Score: 1

      In case anyone doesn't know, the parent is spoofing a song by Murray Head entitled One Night in Bangkok.

      We knew, but the song is by Björn Ulvaeus and Benny Andersson (of ABBA fame) from their musical Chess which was a big hit in London's West End (and elsewhere). Murray Head sung "the American" in the studio recording.

    4. Re:New hit song by MS.. by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      Bangkok, Oriental setting
      And the city don't know what the city is getting
      The stripped down orphan of the OS world in a
      deal with everything but Steve Ballmer

      Time flies - doesn't seem a minute
      Since Licensing 6 put you right deep in it
      All change - don't you know that when you
      Sell at this level there's no ordinary revenue

      It's Munich...or Florida...or - or this place!

      Continuations welcome...

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  13. The Microsoft mentality by jdkane · · Score: 5, Insightful
    We don't want to provide a version of XP without Media Player to the EU. That would be catastrophic to our business.

    However Thailand can have this nice stripped down version of XP.

    1. Re:The Microsoft mentality by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's free trade for you; Microsoft is free to decide who they want to sell to, what they want to sell, and how they want to sell it, all to maximize their profit margin(their goal as a business). You can't have control over Microsoft, and that kind of free trade at the same time.

    2. Re:The Microsoft mentality by lphuberdeau · · Score: 1

      I just wonder how they can strip it down anyway, it doesn't come bundled with anything in the first place. Of course, if they could strip the amount of security holes, it would be an improvement.

      --
      Qui ne va pas à la chasse n'a pas de gibier
      PHP Queb
    3. Re:The Microsoft mentality by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Funny

      The difference being the majority of all software in Europe probably *isn't* stolen.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    4. Re:The Microsoft mentality by F13 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This also from the New Straits Times reveals the mentality:
      Microsoft offered the discounts in Thailand so it could join the government's People's PC programme, after the Thai government began offering Linux through it.
    5. Re:The Microsoft mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      sure however free trade would mean that anyone could re-import this started editon anywhere

    6. Re:The Microsoft mentality by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      Is there anything stopping that though? Looking at the article, it's not like there's any sort of DVD region controls, so it seems to me that there's nothing stopping you from doing so.

    7. Re:The Microsoft mentality by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ummm ...

      No matter what the article says, I'd bet that there will be some fine print in the "starter edition" EULA that is intended to stop this sort of thing.

    8. Re:The Microsoft mentality by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Even if there weren't, I imagine that a Thai-only copy of Windows with no English language bundle would be of quite limited usefulness.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    9. Re:The Microsoft mentality by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 1

      No, abuse of monopoly position isn't free-anything. Not free market, not free trade, not free dom.

    10. Re:The Microsoft mentality by skyhawker · · Score: 1
      You can't have control over Microsoft, and that kind of free trade at the same time.
      True enough. The problem is that Microsoft is a monopoly, and one that has illegally abused its monopoly position repeatedly. That's where antitrust comes into play. And that's why there need to be external controls placed on Microsoft. If Microsoft behaved more like a good corporate citizen, there would be no need for government intervention. It's their behavior that forces government's hand.
      --

      The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank.
      -- Scotty.
    11. Re:The Microsoft mentality by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      And Microsoft is free to contradict itself. They can even take actions that directly contradict statements they have made in various courts of law.

      You'll have to forgive us for not being polite enough to ignore this and, in fact, enjoy the rich irony.

    12. Re:The Microsoft mentality by hph · · Score: 1

      Yes, and a good thing too. The other side of the equation is that the consumer is entirely free to buy this version of Windows, any other version, or Linux or OSX, or he may buy none of them and head down to the beach and surf the waves. He is a free man living in a free society, noone is forcing him to buy Windows.

    13. Re:The Microsoft mentality by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1
      I was thinking that myself, but it is not clear that English language support will be entirely missing. The cited article describes the cut-down product as follows:
      Last summer, in response to the success that Linux was having in the Thai marketplace, Microsoft began offering Thai citizens a Thai-localized bundle of Microsoft Windows XP Home and Office XP Standard. As part of the deal, Microsoft also stripped out some unspecified features from both products ....

      Thai-localized means that Thai language and speakers are catered for. It may or may not mean that there would be no support for English-only users. Either way, it is (IMO) unlikely that support for viewing / editting English language documents would be removed.

      A Thai "XP Starter" CD would be probably usable to an English speaker with with a good XP book and some cheat sheets ... and a masochistic streak :-)

    14. Re:The Microsoft mentality by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Actually even if they did remove the English localisation, it would be possible to install the English bundle if you had your hands on a copy of the full Windows XP.

      Either way, it's good to see Microsoft are realising the true value of their product, even though it's only in a couple of regions of the world. >:-/

      I'm not entirely convinced that I want the price to go down here though... if it did, more people might buy it, instead of using Linux. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    15. Re:The Microsoft mentality by violet16 · · Score: 1

      Actually, price discrimination (the selling of like goods to different people at different prices) is illegal in many market-driven countries.

      In Europe, Article 82(c) of the European Commission Treaty outlaws price discrimination by an entity in a position of market dominance.

    16. Re:The Microsoft mentality by Alsee · · Score: 1

      We don't want to provide a version of XP without Media Player to the EU. That would be catastrophic to our business.
      However Thailand can have this nice stripped down version of XP.


      And I bet it comes with a "stripped down" version of Media Player.

      I have no idea what Microsoft plans to strip from anything, but they sure as hell want to lock people into their Media player and proprietary formats. Every WMx file in Thialand helps lock in both their OS and media control.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    17. Re:The Microsoft mentality by tbjw · · Score: 1

      Except of course that Microsoft should be bound by national and international law.

      They aren't you know.

    18. Re:The Microsoft mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's free trade for you

      I wish people would stop bringing up the "free trade" argument, it's meaningless as long as Microsoft are granted international monopolies through copyrights and patents.

  14. No Product Activation by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've read several stories about this stripped version of Windows, and what they all fail to mention is that it also lacks Product Activation. Sure, Product Activation in Asia is like duct taping your BMW's door shut in Detroit, but it's still significant.

    People in Thailand can share their copies with their friends and family. But those of us in the rest of the world cannot. It just makes NO sense. We pay MORE for restrictions!!!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:No Product Activation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      It lends credence to the preceeding comparisons with addictive drugs and their methods of distribution and later exploitation.

      Maybe it is no coinidence that Thailand is near the "Golden Triangle"?

    2. Re:No Product Activation by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Shockingly I never considered that angle. From what I've read, everyone in Thailand buys bootleg version of their software. Microsoft tried cracking down on that "piracy" and the government there essentially said, "Go fuck yourself" and announced it would sell its own version of Linux to its citizens. A compromise was made where Microsoft would lower its prices and the government would not sell its own version of Linux.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:No Product Activation by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      And what's stopping you from just buying the Thailand version then?

    4. Re:No Product Activation by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Funny

      The ten years it would take me to learn the language.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    5. Re:No Product Activation by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Probably not being able to speak Thai. The "starter edition" is stripped of english language support.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:No Product Activation by Fidelis · · Score: 1

      Actually it makes alot of sense.
      Monopoly Rule #1: Protect you market share !!, you can always make money later.

    7. Re:No Product Activation by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I meant it makes no sense for us!!! Why do we put up with it?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    8. Re:No Product Activation by Feztaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People in Thailand can share their copies with their friends and family. But those of us in the rest of the world cannot. It just makes NO sense. We pay MORE for restrictions!!!

      It makes perfect sense. The market determines the price; people are willing to pay $300 for a box of windows, so MS charges $300. Other countries can't afford that much, so they reduce the price to help move the product.

      The fact that you pay more for more restrictions is just funny; you have alternatives.

    9. Re:No Product Activation by HybridJeff · · Score: 1

      You do know what the soluition is right? If enough people do like they do in Thailand and pirate a copy for yoursef. If piracy reaches the smae levels here as in Thialand, it would make more sense to use the same (or similar) marketing strategies. Including "starter editions."

    10. Re:No Product Activation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to know any Thai to use a localised Thai copy of Windows, I mean how much reading of menus and dialogs do you really do...

    11. Re:No Product Activation by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful


      I've read several stories about this stripped version of Windows, and what they all fail to mention is that it also lacks Product Activation.


      I suspect that Product Activation and other recent anti-copy measures have little to do with protecting sales. It is actually an attempt to derail a dangerous perception.

      First, consider that "piracy" does not harm Microsoft. In the past decade or so, Microsoft's products have been widely pirated. Yet Microsoft's sales have still been impressive. And even an illegal copy of a product will work within Microsoft's lock-in business strategy.

      So why all the recent activity with licensing? Microsoft must show that their products cost something. They must avoid looking like their software is free. If they fail to do this, they simply reenforce a major threat to their business; commodity software. Or, more specifically, the commodity operating system.

      This new product reflects this strategy. Microsoft hasn't been especially concerned with the wide-spread illegal distribution of their products in Asia in the past. However, when the Thai government starts looking at Linux, Microsoft suddenly takes special steps.
    12. Re:No Product Activation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People in Thailand can share their copies with their friends and family. But those of us in the rest of the world cannot. It just makes NO sense. We pay MORE for restrictions!!!

      If it gets your panties in that much of a ruffle, just go download a copy of Windows XP Professional, which disables product activation, and you won't have to pay jack shit.

    13. Re:No Product Activation by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      A compromise was made where Microsoft would lower its prices and the government would not sell its own version of Linux.

      Not true. Linux TLE is still the default. See for instance this article, though it's a few months old.

    14. Re:No Product Activation by Zzootnik · · Score: 1

      Most of "we" don't-- Hands Up: Who Runs a Non-MS OS?

      --
      Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
    15. Re:No Product Activation by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 1

      By then you might be able to get a stripped-down Thai version of Longhorn.

      --
    16. Re:No Product Activation by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Not really, unless you go to a lot of trouble to find a computer that doesn't come with windows preloaded. I know there are options (Apple, Walmart, little independant shops, and building your own), but those aren't realistic for many people.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    17. Re:No Product Activation by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Well, if Apple computers "aren't realistic for many people", then neither is any OS other than Windows, so it doesn't really matter...

    18. Re:No Product Activation by Alsee · · Score: 1

      It just makes NO sense. We pay MORE for restrictions!!!

      Shhh! Don't anybody tell him about the extra DRM licencing costs rolled into VCRs and DVD players DAT tapes and most e-books and RIAA music download stores. And I can almost gurantee your soundcard is SecureAudioPath compliant.

      Oh, and the next computer you buy will most likely cost a few dollars more because all motherboards are slated to come with Trusted Computing chips standard. Many new laptops already have them them built in.

      Sure, you can leave the Trust chip off and use it just like a normal computer, but you will have already paid extra for it. And software will increasingly refuse to install unless you "voluntarily" activate the chip - and files will increasingly be unreadable unless you "voluntarily" activate the chip - and websites will increasingly return error messages unless you "voluntarily" activate the chip. Microsoft is touting new e-mail and office documents that will be unreadable unless you "voluntarily" activate the chip. Cisco has announced new routers that will DENY YOU INTERNET ACCESS unless you "voluntarily" activate the chip.

      Either "voluntarily" submit to the chains of Trusted Computing or "live free" at the bottom of a pit cut off from all of the new software, cut off from all the new files, and unable to connect to the the network.

      There's a huge battle brewing and it's going to seriously break one way or the other. Either there's going to be a HUGE public backlash against Trusted Computing or we will have Trusted Computing imposed on us all.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    19. Re:No Product Activation by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      That's good news.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    20. Re:No Product Activation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it will take most people 20 minutes to figure out how to disable the call-home registration and 30 minutes to find a real XP keygen.

      It is not a problem to those that have a clue.

      (oh if you do not have a clue ,please ask those that do for a CD with the keygen and above files. and be sure to give it to others....

    21. Re:No Product Activation by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Oh, Apples are great (I'm writing this on an iBook). The only downside is the lack of games. But, my point was that the market will only "bear $300 for Windows" because it comes bundled on their computers unless they go out of their way to find one that isn't. If everyone had to pay for it separately they might consider "Hmm... do I really need to spend $300 for this?"

      Also, most people don't even consider Apples; they still think "Aren't those only for art people?" or "I can't play any games" or "Why would I spend that much money for a computer when I can get a POS eMachines or Dell for half the price?" These misconceptions are mostly incorrect, but they're still prevalent.

      As for Linux, most people still just say "What's that?"

      Finally, most people really do need Windows, or at least think they do, because of all the Windows software they already have. Even though it's false economy, they'd rather spend extra $ on new versions of Windows than find Free (and free) alternatives and switch to Linux (and have to give up their old software - it makes them think they wasted their money on it), let alone switch and spend extra $ on proprietary Linux or Mac compatible software.

      In other words, they wouldn't switch even if it costs less, just because hurts to throw out stuff you've already paid for.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    22. Re:No Product Activation by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Baseline apple product: Around a grand. Baseline PC product: Around $300. Midgrade apple product: Around two grand. Midgrade PC, perhaps a refurb: $500. Refurb apples cost damn near as much as new ones, before you start saying "I can do that with Apple too!" Windows OS: $300. Apple OS: $200. Windows OS lasts four years or more, Apple OS maybe two.

      The fact is that even if you pay for software it is about half as expensive to use a PC as it is to use a Mac. Not to mention, there are less places that repair macs than repair PCs so for the average bozo the mac is like owning a citroen in america. Who the hell are you going to get to work on the thing, and if you do find someone, are they going to get it right?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:No Product Activation by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      ...but those aren't realistic for many people.

      I just bought a computer from LinuxCertified.com and it's going to be fine for college. I don't see any reason how this is "unrealistic" for anyone.

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    24. Re:No Product Activation by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      First of all, Macs are worth the extra money, and a baseline Apple product is about equal to a midrange PC. You actually get about the same value for the money (unless you measure value solely in MHz)

      Secondly, Mac OS is not $200, it's $129

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    25. Re:No Product Activation by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Please see my other reply

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  15. Features left: by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two features left out of this version:
    -stability
    -security

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:Features left: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I believe this features have been left out of every version of Windows.

    2. Re:Features left: by MrMojado · · Score: 3, Insightful

      those features have been left out of every other version as well!

    3. Re:Features left: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I paid full price and I didn't get those features!
      Moral: learn thai and get the same deal for less

      arielb

    4. Re:Features left: by TWX · · Score: 2, Funny
      Two features left out of this version:
      -stability
      -security
      That's like saying, "guaranteed financial stability and free oral sex left out in this version".
      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:Features left: by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

      They have to be in the origional version before they can be stripped out of another version

    6. Re:Features left: by hsa · · Score: 1

      Oh, please do tell me version where I can find these features?

    7. Re:Features left: by earlgreen · · Score: 1
      Two features left out of this version: -stability -security

      Huh? Are you telling me there Windows versions *with* those features?

  16. Starter Edition by Philmeeh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this include the undocumented features that allow a remote user to gain control of my system?

    1. Re:Starter Edition by lgftsa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now that's unfair! The remote exploit feature is the most well-documented feature there is!

    2. Re:Starter Edition by Philmeeh · · Score: 1

      Which one?

    3. Re:Starter Edition by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1

      No, only the undocumented features that let you get control back.

  17. Would you buy it? by Spetiam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know about everyone else here, but I'd be willing to shell out $38 for a bare bones XP and Office combo for those highly annoying occasions when I have to use Windows or Office for some task or another.

    Of course, $38 is about as much as I would be willing to pay for the full-"featured" editions, anyhow. Does this cut rate version have some serious compatibility issues, or what? I imagine they wouldn't disable too much functionality, otherwise this little scheme could backfire on them quite badly.
    1. Re:Would you buy it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For 38$ I would buy if it includes the following:

      - Let me pick what I want in the kernel.
      - Basic hardware support, if it doesn't support the latest USB 3.5 gadget that bakes cookies, I can live with that.
      - Basic TCP/IP Stack
      - User manager, disk manager
      - Command line interpreter
      - Direct X 9.0b
      - Give the UI a major fat trimming overhaul, remove the bloat, remove the crap that previews files and consumes precious HD access time and other useless gizmos like that.
      - Remove Internet Exploder.
      - Remove Media Player.
      - Take out everything else, notebook related stuff, from Notepad to Solitaire, take out all of it, just give me a basic OS that I need to play games.

    2. Re:Would you buy it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds a quite a bit like an Xbox, maybe Microsoft will make something like that someday... :)

    3. Re:Would you buy it? by aichpvee · · Score: 0

      Obviously ignoring the fact that an XBox is really rather underpowered for a modern PC, has no official support for keyboards and mice, has almost nothing worth playing (yes, that includes halo which sucks), and requires you to break the law in order to upgrade it?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
  18. The Good and the Bad.... by CommanderData · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A stripped down version of Windows XP and Office XP could be infinitely better than the full versions in the USA if the right features were removed- remove active scripting and VBA from these products, take out a good percentage of the obscure features of Office that no one uses, and presto- a less bloated, more secure computing environment that just happens to have the MS logo on it.

    Hell, for 38 bucks I would give it a try if they rolled it out here. Of course they won't do that, because this whole tactic is about training the next generation of PC owners (developing nations) to become dependant upon MS crack.

    --
    Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    1. Re:The Good and the Bad.... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      So you're saying "It's a good idea, and I'd use it." but also "It's just an evil ploy to get people to use it."

      Is this post praise or damning?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:The Good and the Bad.... by Synonymous+Yellowbel · · Score: 1
      They already are dependent on MS crack - they just didn't pay MS for the privilege before this cut-down version...

      steve

    3. Re:The Good and the Bad.... by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      It's a bit of both...

      Microsoft is the company we all love to hate. This package is designed to prevent Linux gaining a foothold in Thailand, the article spells that out for us. Since they're doing this for the good of their pocketbooks and not the consumer, I damn it. They clearly have no intention of deploying this in the USA, because all US companies and individuals would opt for the stripped down $38 package over the $600 one.
      Of course, if MS creates a leaner, meaner OS because of their desire to crush the spread of Linux in developing nations that's great. I applaud it. As long as the benefits are shared with every country.

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    4. Re:The Good and the Bad.... by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the professional edition to reach $25, and remove the activation feature and license related performance caps, at least before I install it again at home. Not gonna happen I know, but I'm tired of supporting the Microsoft monopoly and getting back an inferior product. At work things are different, whereby if you need a particular piece of software, you WILL pay the price as long as it's profitable or you're a foolish zealot. But at home, I don't need any more Microsoft software, nor am I strongly tempted by it.

      I have a copy of XP already (Visual Studio and Office XP too), but on only one system, which is 5 years older than my current one, and I'm fairly respectful of licensing terms. I turn it on every few weeks but generally avoid it. Since they would rather me solely use Linux than install XP on 2 systems, I must agree and obey.

    5. Re:The Good and the Bad.... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I don't think Linux is really factoring into the deal. In Thailand the problem is piracy. The people there clearly chose to download an illegal copy of XP over downloading Linux, so I really don't think that's the reason.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    6. Re:The Good and the Bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn fool.

      There are a lot of people that in fact do use the automation tools (VBA) every day in their work. ... not just for excel macros, but for AutoCad, CorelDraw, ArcGIS, Surfer and a million other programs.

      The problem is with the assholes that spend their lives looking for unanticipated exploits, not the code that enables millions to work more efficiently.

      ohhh h hhh evil MS! because they let the average home user have the same access to those powerful tools! ... shaddup! if they didn't you'd complain about people having to pay more to do the same.

      But I assume you plod along at 10% speed, unable to take advantage of all that power.

    7. Re:The Good and the Bad.... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      VBA isn't the be-all and end-all of scrpting languages - if those software vendors weren't co-dependant with Microsoft, they could include a decent one, like python or whatever.

      Also note that Applescript has the same purpose in Mac OS that VBA has in Windows, but you never hear about exploits for it (and considering the unix architecture of Mac OS X, that can't be explained completely by marketshare)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:The Good and the Bad.... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      XP Home has already taken almost everything out. There is NO access control that most users can get to. On the local file system it isn't to bad, I can change the ACLs with cacls. But the inability to restrict network access is a BAD thing. And not to mention the lack of SMP. Up until the P4, this didn't matter, but with the addition of HyperThreading, you lose a performance advantage.

      Does anyone here know how to change network access permissions in XP Home? Is modifying the ACL good enough? Or do I need to do something else.

    9. Re:The Good and the Bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss the point completely.

      The average home user does not NEED or USE automation tools. They are not programmers, when they fire up Word or Excel they're not looking to make a macro to do anything. In Word they're either typing a letter or polishing a resume. They don't need anything besides load, save, print, spell-check, and basic fonts/formatting. The same for Excel- I don't have the link to the study handy but it has been proven that the vast majority of home users of spreadsheets just use them to keep lists. Just straight text and numbers in cells, no formulas, sums, references, or macros. Pretty much a glorified todo list.

      Now why would the average home user want to pay over 10 times as much for features he/she does not use, and would also potentially cause his computer to malfunction if exploited?

      No one said that you could not have your full version. Most people do not need or want the full functionality available to them today.

    10. Re:The Good and the Bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even someone with a pirated copy of XP is still an XP user. He will still send documents in Word 2003 format, requiring everyone he communicates with to get Word 2003, thus expanding Microsofts market share.

      From Microsofts point of view:

      Linux user = bad for MS.
      XP pirate = good for MS.
      legal XP user = even better for MS.

  19. How do you strip down XP anyway? by Slayk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It comes with like two useful applications. Pretty soon it'll be down to the shell and a handful of .dll files.

    1. Re:How do you strip down XP anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It comes with like two useful applications.

      Well, minesweeper and solitare, of course, but you're forgetting that nifty 3D pinball game. Give credit where credit's due.

    2. Re:How do you strip down XP anyway? by name773 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      use the tool for the job:
      apple for graphics
      *nix for servers
      windows for solitare

    3. Re:How do you strip down XP anyway? by aichpvee · · Score: 0

      I'll take Linux over Apple any day for graphics. Better performance, cheaper hardware, and no ugly ass ui. Just need increased software support.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    4. Re:How do you strip down XP anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'l take Linux any days for graphics like I'll take windows for a command line driven solution.

    5. Re:How do you strip down XP anyway? by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

      Parent is not true.

      Not only does XP come with no useful applications, but hardly any useful applications are available for it.

      I have been thinking lately that Microsoft is in trouble. It's strange because in one way they seem to be on top of the heap but in other ways they're starting to look surrounded... the only place they really are kicking Linux is in the arena of game availability, and even there they're losing ground... I predict that they're going to be reinventing themselves soon.

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    6. Re:How do you strip down XP anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you wouldn't, you liar. You lie. Why would you want to go and lie about something like that? Lair.

    7. Re:How do you strip down XP anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why exactly would you take Linux over Apple for graphics when there are no programs to even utilize the OS? What good is an OS without its apps?

    8. Re:How do you strip down XP anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crackhead

  20. Government involvement by fembots · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It appears in order to get such cut-down version, one must involve the government, the article mentioned both Thail and Malaysian governments.

    So why would a government wants MS to cut price, instead of putting more effort to fight for piracy? Is it cheaper that way?

    1. Re:Government involvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people who make soccer balls for Nike are much more likely to buy a cheap OS than an expensive one.

      Then again, given the fact that there isn't much in the way of moral negativity towards software piracy, I doubt this will change much.

      Why pay for something when you can get it for free?

      Honestly, before I switched to Linux, I used to pirate everything. OS, productivity apps, etc.

      Now that I use Linux, I still don't pay for much but I do pay for useful apps when I need them... Crossover Office, VMWare Workstation, LimeWire Pro... teehee guess what that's for.

      I guess my bias towards stealing from record companies is still there though. ;)

    2. Re:Government involvement by coshx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So why would a government wants MS to cut price, instead of putting more effort to fight for piracy? Is it cheaper that way?

      But you see, they are fighting piracy. If everyone starts pirating this starter edition rather than the full edition, then the amount of money lost to piracy will be significantly lower, or so the Thai government can claim.

      bash: sig: command not found

  21. So crime does pay then? by grolschie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reward for ripping off software, is price reductions and less bloated software? What message is Microsoft giving here?

  22. Another way to look at it by howman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although there has been a lot of talk about how open source is safer and better in many ways than m$, pehaps m$ does have one thing *nix doesn't... As closed source there is no need for developers to learn english to create packages that work in their languages or for their needs.
    Now don't get me wrong, I think M$ is evil... but, even though a non-native english speaker can run *nix in their own language, any programming they want to do is predominantly restricted to English.
    I work in Japan and we do a fair amount of programming in C as well as other languages, and funny enough, although the english abilities of my co-workers are nominal at best, a few verbs and the odd noun, if I speak to them in code they understand me compleatly... It is truely weird... The other day I was trying to tell one of the programmers that the coffee machine was out of sugar, the standard english phrase "The coffee machine is out of sugar' had no effect, as soon as I said 'if led = 1 then sato(sugar) = 0' I was understood...
    So back to my origional statement, although I think open source is much better for the computer industry, the lack of having to learn english in order to get something to work for your business is a definate plus to the managers who decide to implement something purely on the basis of cost.

    --
    flinging poop since 1969
    1. Re:Another way to look at it by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 1

      "The other day I was trying to tell one of the programmers that the coffee machine was out of sugar, the standard english phrase "The coffee machine is out of sugar' had no effect, as soon as I said 'if led = 1 then sato(sugar) = 0' I was understood..."

      you've got the makings of a fascinating book there...

      how to find out what subway station you need to get off at to go to that bar your japanese friends are going to after work:

      if (subwaystation!=bar)
      {
      beer=0;
      }

      if (subwaystation==bar)
      {
      beer=1;
      }

      the possibilites are endless!!

    2. Re:Another way to look at it by dbirchall · · Score: 3, Informative
      Translation and localization is certainly a very interesting topic - not just for developers, but for users. You're lucky - you live in a major industrialized nation that Microsoft can't really afford to ignore or treat as second-rate. So, in Japan, you get your MSDN and everything like that in Japanese.

      Not everyone is so lucky. Microsoft Middle East (based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, overseeing operations in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, Yemen, Lebanon, Jordan, Cyprus, Malta, Egypt and Pakistan) has hardly any content on its web sites (including the Middle East edition of MSDN) in anything but English. Nevermind that Arabic is the official language of the majority of those nations.

    3. Re:Another way to look at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So... Exactly how many versions of C do you want? Do you want a katakana programming language, shi?

      But seriously, english is the de facto language of the Net, and probably that is good since students in almost every country learn their own language... and english.

      It is impossible to have international collaboration without a common language. Linus Torvalds is a native swedish speaker who grew up in Finland and learned operating systems from Andrew Tannenbaum's book. Tannenbaum lives in the Netherlands, so I presume his native language is dutch. Tannenbaum's book was written in english. The comp.os.minix forum was conducted in english. Linux would not have been possible if it had been restricted only to swedish speakers.

      It might be a historical accident that it's english. It might as well be swedish, dutch, japanese, or klingon. But, it is essential to have a common language. This language may exclude some potential members of the community, but without it, there will be dozens of fragmented and almost non-intersecting communities. Likely none of them would become big enough to gain critical mass, and if one does, it stands a good chance of becoming the de facto language of the communities in general.

      Like english is.

    4. Re:Another way to look at it by femto · · Score: 1
      So C has superseded Esperanto? That's neat!

      I wonder if anyone has tried to write an international online newspaper, or similar, in C? It would be an interesting experiment.

      Here's a project for someone: Write a version of the 'swedish chef' filter that translates English to C.

    5. Re:Another way to look at it by LiMikeTnux · · Score: 1

      Clippy was a decent self respecting, slashdot reading geek before microsoft hired him......just goes to sho, if microsoft offers you a job, turn it down, or you too will be a paper clip on the next version of windows.

      --
      yap
    6. Re:Another way to look at it by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >as soon as I said 'if led = 1 then sato(sugar) = 0' I was understood.

      But that's trivially true unless you say "if led == 1".

    7. Re:Another way to look at it by d^2b · · Score: 1
      I appreciate your point of view as a developer, but as a user, surely this is not quite the same? I mean, if you want to code on Windows, you have to learn English too. Maybe you were making one of three related points:
      1. Localization of Windows in Japanese is better than Linux-- This I believe. I've heard it before.
      2. Users of Linux are more likely to need/want to look at the code. This seems weaker to me, since, in general, it takes a lot more effort than learning Japanese to look at the source code to Windows.
      3. The only advantage to open source software is if you can actually read the code. Again I'm not so sure. In general I think the point is that you have many choices for who to pay to fix it for you.
    8. Re:Another way to look at it by starrsoft · · Score: 1

      Coffee machine out of sugar?? That is definitely a different coffee machine...

      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
  23. This would be a bargain... by irokitt · · Score: 2, Funny

    provided Clippy is left out ;)

    --
    If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    1. Re:This would be a bargain... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clippy is in Office, not Windows. And is OPTIONAL. You don't need to have it enabled if you don't want it.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:This would be a bargain... by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Well, I was trying to be flippant;)

      But to actually attempt seriousness, there is the annoying Office Assistant in the "Search for files" dialog (you know, the puppy). The first things I did after installing XP were to activate the firewall, and de-activate that puppy...

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    3. Re:This would be a bargain... by Pikhq · · Score: 1

      XP SE seems to have Office in it...

      --
      echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    4. Re:This would be a bargain... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't change the fact that you can disable clippy. Or the fucking dog and cat helpers, too. You can turn off all the help and customize the layout all you want.


      If OO.o had a little cartoon helper in it, almost everybody on /. would say how nifty it was. Just because it's Microsoft doesn't make it bad. If it is bad, it's bad. But don't point out little things like a talking paperclip as reasons that products aren't good!

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    5. Re:This would be a bargain... by irokitt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (pauses to put on asbestos underwear)

      Actually, OO.o has the lightbulb, which I find just as annoying as Clippy (why does the lightbulb show up every single time I save a file?). And I disabled it too:)

      And I think you need to lighten up-I was making a rimshot, I didn't say Office was bad because early versions of Clippy were annoying. I have a legal copy of Office XP installed, and while I use OO.o for text documents and as an office suite for my Linux box, I use Office for spreadsheets and databases because I like it better.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    6. Re:This would be a bargain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for going off like that, but whenever Microsoft is brought up, there's at least 50 posts with something about clippy. It just really gets my goat.

  24. Re:Starter Edition & crack by jdkane · · Score: 1

    Hey buddy, a Brazilian Official already tried that line of reasoning . That one's a real lead balloon, I'll warn ya.

  25. This might be a good idea elsewhere in the world by Avoid_F8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...If the features they left out were integrated IE, Outlook Express, and media player, I'd pay $38 for it in a split second!

  26. Re:So crime does pay then? by baywulf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No the message given out there is "Competition (from Linux for example) brings price reductions."

  27. Starter For What? by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait, it has even less functionality than normal Windows, and they call it "Windows Starter Edition?"

    Shouldn't Microsoft call it "Linux Starter Edition," or "Mac Starter Edition?"

    Surely they'll soon be switching to something else if this is even worse than Windows...

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  28. hmmmm???? by DaTruth29 · · Score: 1
    'Windows XP Starter Edition'

    Isn't that kinda redundant???

    1. Re:hmmmm???? by aixou · · Score: 1

      'Windows XP Starter Edition'

      Isn't that kinda redundant???


      Yes you are. :)

    2. Re:hmmmm???? by jlp2097 · · Score: 1

      Ohh, the irony. I would love to mod you redundant 'cause this has been mentioned before...

  29. And so it begins... by Garwulf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, I'm not surprised something like this has happened.

    Microsoft is starting to see Linux as honest competition for the desktop market, and acting accordingly to become competitive again. I think you'll see something similar happen here - it wouldn't surprise me if the asking price for Microsoft software is cut dramatically in the next twenty-four months, and it also wouldn't surprise me if the quality starts to improve again.

    All in all, this is a good thing, not a bad thing. The end users can only benefit from this.

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
    1. Re:And so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I love Linux I don't think Microsoft is yet worried about Linux on the desktop market. I think it is more a result of high bandwidth and easily cracked software. If it is cheaper too buy than my time is worth to get a functioning cracked product I will buy it. I think they are missing the mark here though, they are removing some functionality. If they are valuable feature it will still be worth it to get cracked version.

    2. Re:And so it begins... by larko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My impression is that Microsoft is doing this because it knows there are people that cannot afford XP at the full price, not because it is trying to become competetive "again" with linux. If a town of people in a very poor area can put up enough money to run 2 public terminals, that's $80 MSFT didn't have before. And now, 100 more people have used Windows.

      If they cut prices in the US, it'll be because everyone who will pay $300 for XP has paid $300 for XP, not because they're afraid of Linux. I think MSFT views the two different markets entirely separately, and I don't think you can take what they do in one (the "emerging markets") and use it to infer anything they might do in the other (ours).

      In terms of profit, I think it's rather genius. And best of all is that now it sort of looks to the media like MSFT cares about bringing third-world countries up to speed, slicing prices dramatically so that everyone can experience the glory of technology.

    3. Re:And so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, not at all, oh my god. this move has 0 to do with linux and everything to do with piracy in thailand. i know this is /. and all but please people, not everything has to do with "linux is honest competition for the desktop so microsoft is cowering in it's boots"

    4. Re:And so it begins... by jwcorder · · Score: 1
      I am not knocking *nix here, or the open source forum, but the reasoning behind this drop was not free open source software. It was the high priacy black markets in this country mixed with the fact that GNP for "Third World" countries is so low, they could not afford the prices for Windows that we pay.

      The government negotiated with MS to get the price low enough that they could build a standard computer with Windows on it for (if my memory serves me right) 250 dollars US.

      Now the Linux competition is a separate argument that does not come in to play in this instance. One could argue that there is a possibility that Linux was the backup plan if this fell through, but I honestly do not know one American over 40 years old (that I don't work with) that would be able to use Linux. I can't imagine that the Taiwan market would be any better.

      The point is the get poor people connected and I give MS some props for seeing this not only as a way to get legal copies of windows on the market, but as a way to welcome the less fortunate to the digital age.

      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    5. Re:And so it begins... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      it wouldn't surprise me if the asking price for Microsoft software is cut dramatically in the next twenty-four months

      So you're saying you'd be incredibly surprised if the price was cut 25 months from now?

      Three cheers for arbitary numbers, and statements so vague they say nothing... Hip, hip, hurray!

      And yet you got modded up... Truly, zombies must be rising from the grave, and getting mod-points on /.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:And so it begins... by Anarcho-Goth · · Score: 1

      I heard rumors that MS ignored people who pirated their software, especially OS, for personal use because it made their software ubiquitous, and insured their dominance in the business world.

      So, would it make sense for them to give it away "free as in beer" for personal use, while making money on business licenses, and office and other software?

      Or at least sell it really cheaply here in the states?

      It does make financial sense to sell it so cheaply overseas where people otherwise could never aford to buy it, and piracy is more the rule than the exception. The new lower price is a whole lot better than nothing.

      This still won't affect Linux. Linux is competition for MS, but Linux only has to have people willing to work on it for it to survive. Many are willing to do that even without pay because they want better software.

      --
      I hate Liberals and Conservatives.
      If you are a Liberal or a Conservative, then HAVE A NICE DAY!
      Courage.
    7. Re:And so it begins... by Garwulf · · Score: 1

      "I heard rumors that MS ignored people who pirated their software, especially OS, for personal use because it made their software ubiquitous, and insured their dominance in the business world."

      I'd take that with a grain of salt, though. Microsoft is one of those companies that has gone somewhat nuts trying to stop people from pirating their software - that's where product activation came from, after all

      --
      Robert B. Marks
      Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
  30. Drud pushers... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Have honed this first "fix" strategy to a science, often giving it away in the hopes of a quick, strong addiction.

    Of course, even most drug dealers know a few virtues, I hate to see how Microsoft perverts this tactic.

  31. XP Starter? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I always thought of XP Home as the XP "Starter Edition"!

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  32. starter edition by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 1

    starter edition eh? ooh - i really want to try out those viruses and spyware in starter edition mode.

    starter edition malware only spams out 50 spams an hour - upgrade to the pro edition and YOU TOO would join the other XP happy campers spewing out spam at 500 per hour without knowing about it.

  33. A summary by Enlarge+Your+Penis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Microsoft has released an OS that anyone can use out of the box, is compatible with the majority of hardware and has widespread business and domestic adoption.

    What's Linux got again?

    1. Re:A summary by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      a cute lil penguin named Tux

    2. Re:A summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has released an OS that anyone on the web can use to get IN your box, is compatible with the majority of viruses, trojans and spyware...

      arielb

    3. Re:A summary by Enlarge+Your+Penis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And most people don't care. Most people aren't geeks. As long as they can get their German shit porn, check their emails and maybe play games the internals are irrelevant to them

    4. Re:A summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scheisse porn ... Linux can do that
      Email ... Linux can do that
      Games ... apart from most of the boxed variety ... Linux can do that


      End user apathy ... Linux can't do anything about that

    5. Re:A summary by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What's Linux got again?

      Freedom. Standards compliance. Sourcecode. The scrutiny of independant experts. No one else controls what you can do with your computer.

      -jim

    6. Re:A summary by evilviper · · Score: 1
      What's Linux got again?

      Well, it's got an OS that anyone can use out of the box, is compatible with the majority of hardware, and has widespread business adoption. In addition, it's got tons of enterprise-level software, completely free of charge, and easily modified by anyone with basic programming skills. Free software/OS upgrades, far better security, much better performance, etc. And remember, that's just a quick list...

      About the only thing Windows has on it's side is "domestic adoption", as you call it. Since we are talking about Thailand, I'm not sure how true that is either...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  34. how dare you!! by psichaotic · · Score: 0

    all i have to say is it takes serious balls to even put a story with a link to an MS site on slashdot.

  35. and in other news..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    acme lingerie and whoopee products announces their new 'anna nicole smith' "training" bra......

  36. A cut-down version, eh ? by mars_rover · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do they still get all of the bugs and security flaws, or will those become available with the first service pack ?

  37. What's the difference? by jdkane · · Score: 1


    What the heck did they strip out?
    Oh I know, maybe the the "Starter Edition" includes Microsoft Bob to make the OS easier to use.

  38. Shrinking Windows by kaoshin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unfortunately the guy who crammed WOAF (Windows on a Floppy) took his information offline due to some sort of conflict with his employer. There was an article on shrinking windows on /. a year or two ago that mentioned this project. There are programs you can download to remove a lot of components from windows like litepc. I always knew someone would make a living out of decrufting windows! I have an old notebook I installed windows 2000 on so I can use Microsoft Mappoint on the road. Mappoint is a pretty big program. North American maps are like a 1.2GB full install so I needed to trim space, and litepc saved me a lot of time. Unfortunately most of my problem is usually introducing my own cruft on systems, which is why I like debian's cruft utility, debfoster and deborphan. If anyone knows any similar tools for FreeBSD I'd appreciate suggestions. I'm still trying to figure it all out, but all other apps I used on Linux were already supported in FreeBSD.

    1. Re:Shrinking Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy sh!t, do the letters A.D.D. mean anything to you?

    2. Re:Shrinking Windows by kaoshin · · Score: 1

      I know of at least 43 things.

    3. Re:Shrinking Windows by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's another nifty windows shrinking tool. It's free, too.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    4. Re:Shrinking Windows by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      http://newdos.yginfo.net/msdos71/index.htm

      Scroll all the way down. It's MiniWindows, the setup environment on Windows 9x/Me, converted to be a full-featured OS. MS-DOS 7.1, a hacked WinFile.exe (handles LFN), CD drivers, the works.

    5. Re:Shrinking Windows by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Also, I found the WOAF guy. I even tried Web Archive, and it gave a "Sorry, page removed" (that was what got archived, not an error for web.archive.org).

  39. Free... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I always thought windows and were free? Why would i pay 40 bucks to get it?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Free... by aichpvee · · Score: 1, Insightful
      What part of "A well regulated militia" do you not understand, moron? The point is that you can have guns to protect the country from threats internal and external, not so you could run around with a 9mm you're more likely to accidently shoot your child with than ever fire in self defence.

      You might also take note of the "well regulated" part. That means you don't get to own any gun you like whenever you feel like it.

      Constitution, read it sometime instead of taking the out of context quotes from the NRA website:

      Amendment II

      A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
  40. Real name... by dj245 · · Score: 1
    Windows XP: Piracy Stopgap Edition.


    Its not gonna work unless they charge only $5 for it though.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Real name... by JohnFromCanada · · Score: 1

      "Its not gonna work unless they charge only $5 for it though."

      And offer a $10 mail in rebate.

  41. Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clippy, search doggy and kerneld32.dll are
    all you get!

  42. I'll jump on the bandwagon by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    This is a waste of microsoft's time and money. When piracy is common and not enforced people still are not going to pay for a cheaper version of windows. My guess is they did this to slow the adoption of linux in these countries. I think microsoft should instead started some bullshit charity program and just give copies of windows out. They don't care so much about making money off each copy of windows out there. They care about people depending on it so they keep using it thus making adoption to linux more difficult and expensive.

  43. Oh brother by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Microsoft creates a version of Windows that everybody here's been wanting, and what we get is a string of conspiracy theories and stale jokes about Windows reliablity.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Oh brother by leomekenkamp · · Score: 1

      I would have liked to make the "You must be new here!" joke, but since you already objected on stale jokes, I will try not to...

      Hmmmpf Rmmmhh

      Grhmmblhhh

      YOU MUST BE NEW HERE!

      Sorry for that, it was stronger than me.

      --
      Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
  44. Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 5, Funny

    For some reason Clippy has managed to become the all-purpose whipping boy to use against Microsoft. After my first encounter with the creature I don't understand why this running gag is continually modded "Funny".
    Is it because he's annoying? Well even if he is, there are still three easy opportunities to remove Clippy. The first is on install, where you can customize the installation to remove the "Office Assistant". The second is in Word instself, where you can permenently "Turn off the office assistant". Finally you can temporarily "Hide the office assistant".

    Save your mod points for things that are truly worth it. Clippy has had enough.

    --

    Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
    1. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In more modern versions of Office, that is the case, and I haven't had to deal with Clippy in years. In Office 97, Clippy had a habit of resurrecting himself just after you thought you had killed him for good. Ancient history, yes, but old gripes die hard.

    2. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by westlake · · Score: 1

      The dog and cat live on because many folks actually like a touch of color and animation on the desktop. If Links encourages use of the Help system all the better.

    3. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

      The first versions made word crash before you had the chance to disable it... lol...
      The dreadfull register db was the place to disable that, but novice users werent able to do that...

      Memories, deja vue or nightmares? My solution was Mandrake...

    4. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by holloway · · Score: 2, Funny
    5. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's hillarious!!! So, if I understand the "movies" correctly, the biggest selling point of Office XP is that it doesn't have Clippy. Hot damn, need to get a PO for $499 quick!!!

    6. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, like most MS marketing, it's a complete lie. Clippy will pop up occassionally with Office XP.

    7. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it wholely amusing that parent is modded +5 funny.

    8. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by srenker · · Score: 2, Informative

      The guy who wrote the "Clippy engine" originally had what he thought was pretty good AI that would make it only pop up if the user was really thrashing around. Marketing made him change the algorithm to show Clippy a lot sooner, presumably so demo users would be sure to see this "feature" in the store. There was a blurb about it in Wired, I think.

      --
      My new /. login is fabu10u$.
    9. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by Alsee · · Score: 1

      LMAO! OfficeXP! It's good because it doesn't have clippy!
      Acme purple peppermint peanutbutter pickles! Now with less toxic sludge!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    10. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      except this is difficult for your average user
      by default, homo shit like that should be turned off.

    11. Re:Clippy sure gets a lot of flack by rctay · · Score: 1

      I believe I read Office Assistant code came from MS Bob. The now Melinda Gates was involved with that project. That's how Bill met her. You see Bill has a sentimental and romantic side, that's why we still have Clippy.

  45. Windows 98 was a Quitter's Edition by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 1
    But I'll switch my home box back to Windows when Microsoft starts paying me money for using this PITA.

    (This post was subversively written using Mozilla 1.7 on Gentoo Linux.)

  46. More M$ lies by Oriumpor · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I love it. Just as they "CANNOT" remove IE from windows... But for some reason I can... I call Bullshit (WARNING:EXPERIMENTAL, Shameless self promotion..) Please comment if you see gaping failures in the procedure.

    The whole thing stinks... Microsoft gets away with lying in court outright. Releasing a stripped down version of XP for the Xbox without IE, and implimenting a newly stripped down (non-english) version of XP that apparently works well enough to sell...

    On top of which I'm nearly positive someone could write a registry import that would be able to remove any Windows feature entirely including the self healing. But Microsoft refuses to do any such thing in the markets it currently holds the monopoly in, claiming it would cause windows to no longer function.

    WTF, like IE is going to mess with the win32 api... As if the fact that they can do it in taiwanese, or for the xbox should confuse the fact that they can't do it in english, or for a PC.

    1. Re:More M$ lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey smartass mod, post if you got a comment... I know the above post isn't "redundant"

  47. I was thinking I'd pay MORE for an MS Office vers by MEGAMAID · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking that I'd pay MORE for an MS Office "Starter" version. An Office type program without all the crap that comes with it would be great!

    But then there already is one OO :)

    --

    Waking Up - There must be a better way to start the day.
  48. However by Professor+Cool+Linux · · Score: 1

    What says this is gonna fix piracy if you can get the full version for $5 on the street?

    Plus, what says this can't be hacked & ta-da we have an engilsh version...

  49. Old News by cybergrunt69 · · Score: 1
    According to a link from the main article, www.microsoft-watch.com, has already covered it:
    This is an edited version of an article from the February 6, 2004, issue of the Microsoft Watch newsletter.

    This may help somewhat with the growing use of Linux in Tailand and Malaysia, but I really doubt it. This has the strong smell of a bait-and-switch scam. As much as you say you'd like to see this offered elsewhere, they never will, as we pay so much for it already (OEM systems, buisnesses, etc). Most big companies are so deeply-rooted in MS software, they can't change - which gives MS no real reason to try it...
    --
    --- "To ignore race and sex is racist and sexist!" -- Jesse Jackson
  50. Windows compatible with the majority of hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows the most hardware compatible OS?
    I don't think so.

    Linux IS the most hardware compatible OS around.

    Just how many kinds of CPUs and hardware platforms can Windows run on compared to Linux?

    Windows is convenient for me it came with the box, but Linux is everywhere, running entertainment systems, desktops, servers and even the wifi router on my desk.

  51. Does not work this way by e.colli · · Score: 1

    There is an interesting effect about pirated copies. Whenever the "starter" edition is cheap, the trend is to pirate the most expensive, because they are free at all.
    For example, there is the Microsoft Works that is called the starter version of Office by some retailers, but I saw very few copies around.

  52. but one must wonder by nizo · · Score: 1

    Do all the popular free virii and ilk get installed just like the full version of Microsoft Windows or perchance do they just come pre-installed?

    1. Re:but one must wonder by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      I would hope so! This Starter Edition is beginning to look really attractive. I've been missing out on so much: no virus/spyware/adware/whatever scanner has ever found any nastyware on my computer, and it doesn't even crash all the time. I don't know what I'm doing wrong! My Key Windows Applications lack purpose! This is an outrage. I have to use Linux whenever I want to feel like an utterly helpless idiot! And even then I might start to pick up a couple more clues, and I'll probably start to like it! Sheesh, I guess I need a lobotomy.

  53. It's odd... by mealtime_warrior · · Score: 1

    that Microsoft would spend 'valuable' time and money working on a stripped down version of WinXP. Why did they not just sell normal WinXP Home at a cheaper rate, and put all the time and money into developing better security for their OS?

  54. Simple Logic by earthstar · · Score: 1

    The logic is so simple- they either make the thai ppl buy their Windows product or gain zero money while letting them all use linux.To avoid outrage from others who have bought the same product for hundreds of dollars,call it 'stripped-down'.
    Anyway only OS is free.They'll always have to cough up money for anti-virus,to keep the comp working.

  55. To Combat Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "To combat Linux"? Wow, that's a great way to do so. So instead of perhaps, lowing prices, they take away features to go against something that could be obtained for free...

  56. Jesus H. by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    And people wonder why MS is so hated. They sell a product bundle for $38 which sells for into the $500 range here. Sure, it's "missing some unspecified features" but what the hell. I'll go waaaaaaaaaaay out on a limb and suggest that there would be a probable reduction in US piracy of MS products on the order of 95% or so if this bundle was available at this price here. People know when they're being bilked. And here is just yet another example detailing example how much we're being bilked for.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  57. Windows XP Beta? by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was in Thailand (Pattaya Beach, nice town, plenty of Adult Entertainment) before XP was resleased and got the Beta version of Windows XP for about 600 Baht, about $5 US at the time.

    It's obvious that Microsoft is attempting to curb piracy in third-world countries. Sorry, it's not going to work. Once they've cracked the copy protection, XP Starter Edition will be should next XP Pro, Visual Studio .Net and Office 2003, all priced at 1,200 Baht (but, you can get them down to 600).

    They even sell copies of Linux. Strangely, most PC I've seen in Thailand run pirated version of Windows. Even the people who sell copies of Linux next to Windows were surprised to learn that it was completely free.

    More Linux advocacy in needed in such countries were the majority of the computer using population relay on pirated copies of Windows.

    --
    I think I think, therefore I think I am.
    1. Re:Windows XP Beta? by belmolis · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've got no idea how much advocacy they are doing, but there is a Thai linux group. Their web site includes a library for Thai language support. There is a page (in Thai) about the activities of the Thai Linux Working Group.

    2. Re:Windows XP Beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm typing from Linux TLE, a Thai version of Linux. We have a government organization called NECTEC, whose one of their responsibilities is to promote the use of Linux. So the government was kind of support it. Then there were quite a few developers working inside and outside NECTEC on adding and improving Thai libraries.

      There were lots of activities and promotions back then when Linux TLE was released, about 2 years ago. I don't really know what happened since because I'm in the US all the time. But seems like MS has won the war and people stop talking and hearing about Linux TLE anymore.

      I've been using this TLE for almost a year. I can't get any updates from the TLE official site anymore. Seems like everything has stopped. So I'd think that the campaign and all the promotions were not that sucessful.

      Linux server is quite popular in Thailand. But Linux desktop is a different story. It can't grow if there is no sustained supports from the government. If MS keeps lowering their price, there would be no real incentive to go for Linux desktop. Thai language support in Windows is far better.

      I can live with TLE because I use Thai only occasionally. Security, stability and performance are more important to me. To be honest, I was on dual boot for quite a while before I completely switched to TLE last year. The day I decided to switch was when my w2k got infected by a virus. Can't remember what was it, there are plenty of them.

  58. Re:So crime does pay then? by whm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't be silly. The buying power of $38 in Thailand is much different from $38 in the US.

    I'm in Bangkok at the moment actually, for the week. Perhaps some example prices:

    1) dinner, with a beer: 80 Baht ($2)
    2) 3 star hotel: 1000 Baht ($25)
    3) Taxi to the airport: 400 Baht ($10)
    4) Commuter train: 10 Baht (25 cents)
    5) Recent LEGITIMATE video games: 400+ Baht ($10)
    6) Recent LEGITIMATE DVDs: 200+ Baht ($5)
    7) etc.

    And that's all in Bangkok, not the countryside.

    Anyways - if the actually expect people to buy a legitimate copy, they need to at least make an attempt pricing it properly. It's much more convincing to buy the $5 pirate copy of Windows (which you can get in the mall, in the street, you pick) when the legit version is hundreds of dollars! If the price comes down to a sane level, people will consider buying it.

  59. Not so Krafty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, you could save seven lines and do:

    beer = subwaystation==bar;

  60. what did they cut out? by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

    does this version not have as many security holes?

    CB

  61. Speaking of Thailand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If programmers made stripjoints:

    Stalker linuxGuy = new Stalker();
    LoserBoyfriend openSourceZealot = new LoserBoyfriend();
    DeadBeat iWasOutsourced = new DeadBeat();

    patronCollection.Add(linuxGuy);
    patronCollectio n.Add(openSourceZealot);
    patronCollection.Add(iWa sOutSourced);

    foreach(ClubPatron in patronCollection) {
    IBouncer meatHead = new ExCon(BouncerBehavior.ExtremePrejudice);

    if(patron is IBroke)
    meatHead.TossOutOnAss(patron);
    }

  62. Re:So crime does pay then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like the concept of pricing to what the market can afford and is *willing* to pay (note, I didn't say 'wants to pay': no-one really wants to pay anything).
    Pity the music/film industries hadn't been drinking from the same water, yes?

  63. Streamlining Crap by rastin · · Score: 1

    Windows is already the most worthless OS out of the box, is it missing themes, sound effects, solitare? Bet its still just as responsive to viruses.

  64. MOD PARENT DOWN - SPAM LINKAGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care how "funny" or "insightful" a bait comment is... if the mods keep rewarding the fools that post advertisement links, they're not much better than Mr. Spammer with a googlebomb.

  65. Just how stripped down? by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Windows XP Home is pretty stripped down as it is. If they intend for this to compete with Linux, why strip it down at all? Linux is still free, and is usually distributed with 90% of the software you'll ever need.

    This is one of Microsoft's big problems. You ask how much for a FULL, unrestricted version of Windows to put on a single DESKTOP system, and the answer is in the thousands of dollars, because they only expect enterprise users to need such functionality, and only on dedicated servers. If you buy XP home or professional, and install 3rd party server software to handle a peak of over 10 users (5 for home), you are violating the EULA.

    Linux and similar operating systems give you the freedom to do whatever you damn well please with your system, something that Microsoft is incapable of offering without cutting deeply into their profits, because of their high market share.

    1. Re:Just how stripped down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Windows XP Home is pretty stripped down as it is. If they intend for this to compete with Linux, why strip it down at all? Linux is still free, and is usually distributed with 90% of the software you'll ever need.

      assumming of course that you are english speaking and can make sense of the 3,000 or so randomly chosen apps included with the typical Linux distribution.

    2. Re:Just how stripped down? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      It isn't to compete with Linux. It's to compete with the rampant piracy going on over there.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  66. Nearly exact analogy ... by quarkscat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to a drug dealer passing out crack cocaine
    laced marijuana cigarettes to the kiddies
    for free. Where else is the next generation
    of Micro$oft clients going to come from?

    1. Re:Nearly exact analogy ... by eyeye · · Score: 1

      How would you lace "marijuana cigarettes" with crack cocaine?

      If you are going to use analogies you should at least understand the subject you are trying to draw a parallel to.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  67. Here's an idea for Microsoft by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just call it "Windows XP - Free edition" As free as Linux but completely stripped of anything useful. Just enough in the OS to get the system to boot and show the bliss screen, but nothing more. If you want accessories, notepad, solitaire, IE and all of the other goodies, you pay money. So then a customer gets two choices... Get a free copy of Windows with nothing, or get a free copy of Linux with everything and the kitchen sink. ....and then Microsoft will be competitive. :D

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  68. So much for the old saying. by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to "Piracy is why you pay so much for software. If there were less pirates, the price would drop" mantra that Microsoft and the other heavy hitters used to preach?

    Thailand has tons of piracy going on there, and they're rewarded with a cheap version of Windows. GO FUCK YOURSELF MICROSOFT. You lying pieces of shit. We reward you by buying your software and you renege on your side of the deal, doing the exact opposite of what you said. Tonight I'm dropping Windows altogether. You won't see a penny of my money anymore.

  69. I feel pity, great pity by flechette_indigo · · Score: 1

    2 choices:
    1) WIn-starter: A 'starter version' of a crap OS made by people who aren't even interested in making quality software. Remember, Microsoft is in the business of making money, not software.
    2) The finest OS on earth designed by the finest minds on earth, for free: LInux.

    My pity is vast.

  70. DOJ by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    i thought the DOJ once told M$ to strip down their version of windows not to include IE and the other junk, and M$'s reaction was that it wasnt possible because everything's part of the OS and completely tied to each other.... and now we have this version of windows?

  71. Cut-rate version of Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > stripped-down, cut-rate version of Windows

    Doesn't that apply to ALL versions of Windows?

  72. At least they're prepared by Gatton · · Score: 4, Funny

    With about 95% of the country being Buddhist at least they're already familiar with the concept of suffering ;-)

    1. Re:At least they're prepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please mod parent up

  73. So they really could make a stripped down version by foniksonik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was under the impression that MS wasn't able to make a version of Windows without all the bells and whistels... I guess it's okay now that all of their lawsuits have been settled. So they are guilty of anti-trust and they are liars, this isn't news.

    When will the US see a version of Windows that is JUST an Operating System? I wouldn't even mind it if they included a separate disk with 'bundled' but optional software, like a music player, a photo album tool, and maybe some video editing software... heck for the good PCs they could even include some sort of DVD authoring tool. ;-p

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  74. Re:So crime does pay then? by bersl2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of those who obtain pirated copies of Microsoft software, I'm willing to bet that at least half would not buy it at full price. Therefore, it is not in Microsoft's best interest to treat the Asian software pirate as a criminal to be prosecuted. It is in their best interest to compete with the street vendors.

    Therefore, the best thing we can do to thwart Microsoft is to get the pirate vendors shut down.

  75. Dover by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Does this anectode remind anybody else of Dover from Suburban Jungle?

  76. Re:So crime does pay then? by Performaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    "1) dinner, with a beer: 80 Baht ($2)
    2) 3 star hotel: 1000 Baht ($25)
    3) Taxi to the airport: 400 Baht ($10)
    4) Commuter train: 10 Baht (25 cents)
    5) Recent LEGITIMATE video games: 400+ Baht ($10)
    6) Recent LEGITIMATE DVDs: 200+ Baht ($5)"
    Seeing Microsoft make a better product in response to competition? Priceless.

    --

    I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
  77. does it include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it include support for all the worms as the professional version?

  78. But I thought.... by Music+To+Eat · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're intregal parts of the OS and are impossible to remove!

  79. Re:Windows compatible with the majority of hardwar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, hahahahaaa, omg, hehee stop it ur killing me! Linux is the most hardware compatable, bahlolahahehee. Ok ok, deep breaths *snicker*. Soooo u can run linux on ur toaster... great, all I want to do is have the latest off the shelf hardware for my PC work with all its features avaliable, and have the OS set it all up for me without having to recompile the kernel to "add support". But then again if i feel like paying Max Pane2 on my wrist watch, i'll goto linux.

  80. Mod parent funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sticking up for poor little clippy is soo freakin crazy it funny.

  81. I guess thats ok... by XMichael · · Score: 1

    It's certainly better than

    Windows XP Warez Edition .. hah


    Security Cameras

  82. So now you get even less... by slasher999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...than any off the shelf Linux distro gives you, plus you still get to pay for it! Where do I get in line?

  83. Re:Windows compatible with the majority of hardwar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA HA HA RTFLMAO ever hear of loadable kernel modules and the hotplug subsystem Einstein??? You don't have to recompile your kernel to "add support" and the hotplug system will "set it all up for (you)" you fucking n00b! Awwwww Windows zealots are so darned cute when they try to act like they know something.

  84. You dudes still do not get it, why? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    The total manufacturing cost differential between a Chevy and an Escalade is maybe $2000. The cost of a good has almost no bearing on its retail price. MS could sell their stuff for a thosand dollars and it would make as much sense from a coupling to the cost as selling it for 5 bucks. That's not the point. The point is how you preserve market share - how you make your product attractive in a market space where people want to pay less. They aren't stealing software because they want to put it to the man. They are stealing because the current dollar price of MS software has actually gone up over time just like the price of most intellectual property based products like movies and music.

  85. Re:I was thinking I'd pay MORE for an MS Office ve by phrasebook · · Score: 1

    OO: less features, more bloat.

  86. M$M$M$M$M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I dont know why they bother with a starter edition at 10 bucks a disk for full or starter on the streetcorner ya might as well go with full right?

  87. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I hope you don't take those posts seriously. Everyone knows 2000/XP is stable and handles reboots much better than previous iterations of Windows. It's just the joke we make about Windows. Just like we all make jokes about Debian/Gentoo/BSD etc. You know what they are. That's why they get +5 Funny as opposed to +5 Insightful.

    Regarding Windows rebooting, I know a lot of people feel that windows is at fault when their machine freezes a few times each week, but it is in fact because they have faulty hardware. Most people can't tell a difference between the OS and the hardware, so they just blame what they're using on the machine (windows) instead of looking for the hard-to-track-down culprit. I'm not saying that's why people on Slashdot make the joke; the joke is something that comes very quickly and is appropriate for a site such as this, where people aren't necessarily here for the insightful and intellectually challenging discussions....

    1. Re:Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a lot of people feel that windows is at fault when their machine freezes a few times each week, but it is in fact because they have faulty hardware.

      I have a dual boot machine that had a bad memory chip in it. Win2k would always hard hang a few minutes after bootup. On Linux 2.6.5 with KDE it paused a bit here and there, but remained stable. So yeah, you're right, I thought my vanilla windows install was dickin me, till I found out about that chip :)

  88. If MS wises up... by mattgreen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Then they'd realize there is a sect of users who would love something like this in the US and Europe. People that don't want the damn animated dogs telling them how to search, or Fisher Price UIs. People who aren't afraid to drag out the command prompt to do things and enjoy having options. Hopefully they get the message that there are still power users on Windows, but it certainly feels like an endangered species at times -- many UI innovations are little more than eye candy or making the UI easier for novice users. Meanwhile, most real power users have graduated to OS X or Linux where they don't have to feel like they are being talked down to.

    All the bundled crap should be optional. That means I should be able to choose whether to install:
    * IE, including disabling shell integration. Additionally I should be able to replace IE with an alternative browser that is used through the system, including applications that embed IE through COM.
    * Media player
    * Windows messenger

    I should be able to fine tune which services are installed and have them explained to me at install time so I know exactly what ports are open. A compiler and build tool for C, C++ and C# should come preinstalled and in the path. You should be able to do anything from the console that you can do from the GUI.

    If this seems outlandish, they could have it simply be two alternate modes of setup whereby you select your expertise level. Like, an "Express" install option versus an "Advanced" mode that lets you tailor everything you want.

    (I tend to be an MS apologist, but this is one point where they really aggravate me.)

    1. Re:If MS wises up... by sirdude · · Score: 1

      I quite agree. But it needs to be an option/feature rather than a pre-requisite.

      In other words, if I were MS I would not want to be required to do this BY LAW :S

      It's my software product and I'll include anything that I want in it and vice versa. If the customer doesn't like it, he can try some other OS..

      Once vendors start looking elsewhere for OS options to combat MS' marketing requirements, and OS drawbacks, and actively promote them, Microsoft will come back in line as it slowly loses market share.

      Just a thought..

    2. Re:If MS wises up... by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      Compiler and build tools as well as a much improved command shell with advanced scripting support will come as standard on every Longhorn disc.

  89. Less Bugs, More Filling by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    While still promising to deliver a fulfilling experience that makes you crave to upgrade to the more costly versions, do you get less bugs along with less of everything else?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  90. Re:So they really could make a stripped down versi by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can take out the things you don't use in windows with a simple tool.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  91. Re:So crime does pay then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is NOT being done to compete with Linux! It's being done to compete with PIRACY !

  92. You must be new to Thailand..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Don't be silly. The buying power of $38 in Thailand is much different from $38 in the US.

    So what? Some things are cheap in Thailand. Doesn't mean that imports are also that cheap. Why would a company who can sell a product for US$100 sell that same product at US$30 at a loss? In Thailand the LEGIT stuff sells at similar price to elsewhere. I have a friend in Thailand who brings me back stuff, with receipts. I won't buy any of the so-called legit games for $5 each as they are clearly fake.

    In other Asian countries, its the same. Of on my suppliers was buying bulk pc parts and said to a Chinese supplier that he only wanted a certain brand of gear. They said that they can stick whatever label he wanted on it. LOL! Of course he ceased business with these guys. Nowdays, he usually flies to China to examine the goods before purchase.

    > 6) Recent LEGITIMATE DVDs: 200+ Baht ($5)

    What a load of BS. There is no way that the movie empire would allow recent LEGIT DVDs to sell for US$5. Are you on crack?

    1. Re:You must be new to Thailand..... by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      I have to question just one thing: what is a "loss" for microsoft. How much does it cost to produce a single licensed CD of windows XP (including the hidden costs)? I've seen profit margin estimates for each copy at upward of 200%!

      Now, how at what point does Windows sell for a loss?

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    2. Re:You must be new to Thailand..... by whm · · Score: 1

      Don't be so naiive. We all know that movies, software, etc. have extremely low cost of manufacture. There is no 'at a loss'. The only way they can sell something at a loss is if it drops below their cost of manufacture, that's what the term means! They are not selling at a loss, they're selling at the price they can actually make a sale at. It's economics.

      If it's clearly fake, then I ask you: how do you prove anything is not fake? I can buy a boxed game for $5. Everything is shrink wrapped, it's from a chain dealer in a mall, the game comes with a manual and all that crap. In fact, the jewel case has a little thingy that says "Not for sale outside of Thailand" (yeah I just checked :) Or, I can buy the same game in a plastic baggie for $0.25 from a little alley stall. Is it not obvious that the former is legitimate? If it's not, then I ask you to give me evidence that the software you purchase from Best Buy is any less legitimate.

      Don't be so quick to jump into the standard assumptions about places you obviously have not been. As for your friend ... I'd like to know where he went was actually given a receipt with a purchase. Sounds bogus.

    3. Re:You must be new to Thailand..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a CD of Midtown Madness 2 years ago that was "legit" and looked legit. When I examined the files on the actual CD it had a folder of cracks and other stuff that MS didn't put there. My friend bought mainly from big chain department stores.

    4. Re:You must be new to Thailand..... by da_anarchist · · Score: 1

      Dude, why don't you keep quiet as you obviously do not know what you are talking about. I was in Thailand last week and can confirm that locally produced and officially licensed DVD's like Kill Bill Vol. 1 and LoTR TTT are only 200 baht ($5) or so. The pirated stuff goes for around 100 baht ($2.5), so you can see that the legitimate distributors in Thailand are wise enough to price their products low enough to make the pirated copies less enticing. Same goes with PC games - most new releases can be found for 400 baht or so from official distributors like Electronic Arts Thailand.

  93. Cheap Windows? by sirdude · · Score: 1
    Noticed an ad advertising cheap OEM software on my site (via adwords/adsense).. The following are the prices advertised on the resulting website..
    --------------
    MS Windows XP Professional

    retail price: $200
    our price: $80
    you save: $120

    MS Windows 2000 Professional

    retail price: $200
    our price: $80
    you save: $120

    MS Windows 2000 Server

    retail price: $100
    our price: $70
    you save: $30

    Macromedia Studio MX 2004

    retail price: $980
    our price: $180
    you save: $800
    -----------------

    I don't know how legitimate these guys are, but the prices sure catch your eye.. So while you aren't getting $38 Windows, 70-80 bucks isn't so bad :)

    Their FAQ provides the following explanation:

    a) How can you sell this software as OEM ?

    It seems too good to be true - is there a catch?
    There is no catch - the software versions that we sell are OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) which means you will receive the installation CDs only (they do not come in their original retail packing and do not include the manual). We do guarantee that all programs are the 100% full working retail versions - no demos or academic versions! When you order, you will receive all materials required for a complete installation - or your money back! Why pay hundreds of dollars more when you can get exactly the same but OEM-CD? You don't have to pay that much for the fancy box and manuals.
    If anyone is brave enough to test these guys out, please update this thread ;)
    1. Re:Cheap Windows? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1
      Deals like these abound, at least in Germany (local computer stores, eBay, etc., though the $80 are something I still associate with spammers), but they aren't telling you the whole truth.

      1) No support from MS. It's your OEM who's supposed to support OEM versions, but in this case you'll kinda be the OEM. This doesn't matter for home users, I suppose, as there're plenty web forums, magazine articles, MS' public newsgroups, et cetera.

      2) Something about warranty. Dunno.

      3) The main difference, however, is in the license and thereby the (lack of) generosity of product activation. An OEM version is supposed to be tied to the computer'S BIOS, though this might not happen unless the OEM pre-installs and -activates it for you in some special, convenient but ultimately annoying way. This is a.k.a. SLP ("System-Locked Preinstallation"). With SLP, you won't have to activate at all - you can rebuild your entire computer as long as the motherboard continues to 'match'. Or so they say.

      I don't know how to install XP that way, though, nor whether I'd want to considering how outdated this no-name mainboard is. So I didn't.

      Either way, you're not supposed to transfer an OEM license to a different machine, unlike the retail version. (Still not on two computers at the same time, naturally. That'd be too useful.)

      Furthermore, it seems you can't update OEM versions (not talking about patches or service packs, only migrations to new versions of Windows or perhaps from XP Home to XP Professional; but of course you don't want XP Home in the first place)

      I've been told that after 4 months (some say 6?) of no reinstalling (shouldn't be a problem, usually), I should be able to install my OEM version on a new computer (might have to beg for it on the phone and explain my computer went up in flames, though, so still no way to use it on two machines without crackzzz).

      In my experience, WPA isn't that restricting. I never had to re-activate, and I upgraded RAM, removed and installed CD/DVD drives, changed video cards, and so on. But this whole thing still ticks me off so much I think I'm gonna go with Win2K next time, bells 'n whistles be damned.

      More WPA details here

  94. A year on... no change! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    As the article points out, this product has been on the market in Thailand for a year now. There is no noticeable change.

    MS just don't understand how people think here in Thailand. 1500 Baht is enough for 10-15 (bootleg) CDROMs or DVDs from Pantip, Fortune Town, Zeer or a handful of other places. Often the bootlegs (particularly WinXP, Office etc.) are replicated (not burnt) discs with full colour labels and look just like the real thing.

    For the average home user, or small business, there's no justification to spend 1,500 Baht on a CD. It's like spending 1,500 Baht on lunch (which you can do here if you want) when the regular price for lunch is less than 50 Baht. It's seen as extravagance; pure and simple!

    Large businesses won't buy it either because they generally prefer a fully-featured OS with ENGLISH! Infact, most Thai people in general don't have any problems using Windows in English, and many prefer it. It's all icons, and most end-users don't read error messages anyway, whatever the language!

    A lot of video games companies have tested the Thai market with cheap Thai versions of their software. They're in English, but the user manual is in Thai. It seems that they can get away with about 200-300 Baht ($5-$7.50) extra for the real thing (depending on the size and beauty of the box!) any more than that and it's a case of "copee dee gwah" (the copied one is better!)

    A 1000% price increase is still too much here.... sorry!

  95. many factors in reboot by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    First off, you have to deal with windows file protection. This is known to help add more restarts than are needed.

    Then you have the installer itself, in may be written to give you a false restart prompt.

    2000 is not as flexible as XP and in my experience requires reboots for stuff that XP handles just fine. This many be how Microsoft writes it patches. I'm not sure on the specifics, but I see it all the time. (depending on the machine it may require as many reboots as an 2000 machine. see below)

    Stuff in memory, stuff that is being used, etc or essentially 'your configuration and usage helps determine if you have to restart.'

    That said, Windows needs a reboot every 30 days or so anyway to keep it running smoothly so it tends to work out. Especially on the server side. Trust me, you don't want to work with a Windows box that's been up for 100+ days. "Hey, why is all the RAM used up? Nothing is running."

  96. Windows pricing by tachum · · Score: 1

    What do I read out of all this? That in a competitive market, the value (as opposed to the price) of Windows is $US38 (and maybe less). Let the competitive OS market roll on.....

  97. (grammar *)syntax(c) grammar(english) || by zlel · · Score: 1

    I think the only reason C translates better is that C grammar is cleaner than English grammer, which could very well be the worst behaving grammer in the world. But once you have to start giving functions names and variables names, I would imagine it to be a very different story - or do your colleagues use english variable names, i wonder?

  98. Stripped-down, cut-rate version? by Thaidog · · Score: 1

    So what's changed?

    --

    ||| I still can't believe Parkay's not butter.

  99. We already have this in the USA by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1
    It is called BartPE and all you need is a SP1 version of an XP Home or XP Pro edition CD. Borrow one from a friend if you can. ;)

    RTFM and follow directions on how to make a bootable BartPE CDR, and then how you can install BartPE to a hard drive.

    Then download and install OOO.

    Then give Microsoft and Billy Boy the middle finger. ;)

    Or try this alternative and install it to your hard drive for a Non-Windows edition and still give Microsoft and Billy Boy the middle finger.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  100. Difference? Free software kicks their ass. by twitter · · Score: 2, Informative
    it would be nice for it to mention what makes it "cut-down".

    Full on Windows is not competitive in it's native language, so the notion of "stripped down sounded odd to me too, but what I found was even more surprising. Just a little reading is very enlightening. No one but Microsoft and end users will know what's going into the package but Windoze is even less competitive in Thai.

    What could they remove for this obvious region based dumping project? Calc? Notepad? The clock on the button bar? Oh wait, I see that they have a "stripped down" version of Office Standard, itself already stripped down.

    I have to wonder what they could remove from such a basic set of software. Office Standard comes with a word processor, spreadsheet, email client and a presentation program and DRM that you have no control over. I suppose they could remove the presentation software and leave the user with ascii or Microsoft's crappy html code generation for information sharing. Spell checker, do they have a Thai spell checker? Do they have Thai anything at all? The user will still be looking for a paint program, pdf writer, a browser and email client worth using and third party software to do anything real that's business related. Who knows when M$'s not talking?

    Microsoft Thai page does not say as far as I can tell without their special software. They have the same bogus "facts" presentation, but you have to have "active scripting" to have the right characters appear. Mostly, the site is in English, the rest is broken, some advert that is. M$ gets its ass kicked by Gnome's beautiful Thai page which rendered perfectly with Mepis / Debian unstable. This page is fun too!

    Given the above differences in software quality and the ease of "piracy", I doubt that M$'s little dumpting scheme is going to work. Their "People's Software" initiative might suck in a few clueless government types but people who know software are going to continue to chose Linux. They could give their stuff away and it would not be taken up.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  101. Are they giving OPenCD with this? by jayan · · Score: 1

    Probably the reseller can give opencd/GNU Win Cd with new 'stripped down' windows?

  102. I want the fairly-tale version of Windows by wardk · · Score: 1, Funny

    I am still waiting for the version that doesn't risk having my computer hijacked, credit card data stolen, my address book copied and blue screens of death as the inevitable conclusion of each computing session.

    any word on delivery date of this version of windows??

  103. Sucks to be you then. by OwP_Fabricated · · Score: 1

    I haven't had to restart my Win2k box for about 2 months now, and that's after installing and uninstalling 4-5 games and about a dozen applications. Memory usage is pretty much the same as when I first booted it too.

    So, am I stretching my credibility there?

    Zealots, ugh. Go away.

  104. Re:Difference? Free software kicks their ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    twitter, we're still kind of waiting on you to get back to this post of yours.

    Please answer the questions. Thanks.

  105. Re:Difference? Free software kicks their ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical sycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

    I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or Mepis or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

    If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

    To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. This is an article about email disclaimers. The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx, because "is teh free".

    Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

    Here's that drive-by advocacy and FUD in motion: twitter goes on about some topic and then drops the usual "oh and M$ is teh evil" because "WMP phones home" or some such. Called on his FUD, he then claims that WMP stores every song and movie you've ever played in a file, somewhere. Pressed further, he just sort of slithers out of sight, his FUD-spreading complete. This is not about some Microsoft technology that nobody likes anyway; it's about lying for the sake of lying. Way too many of his posts are exactly like this one.

    More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own. Or these two. Or this one. Or this one.

    Still not convinced? This is what twitter considers "humour" while going about his daily "M$" routine.

    M

  106. Re:(grammar *)syntax(c) grammar(english) || by dammitallgoodnamesgo · · Score: 1

    At both of the jobs I have had a good 90% of the variable names have been in English. Often with typoes. Which has, in the past, led to me being the one to bring more bugs into the system by using the right (wrong) spelling.

  107. Re:So crime does pay then? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh really? Then why, despite the rampant piracy that's been going on for YEARS , do they only do this NOW that the Thai government has started pushing Linux?!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  108. Piracy DOES lower prices by johnnywheeze · · Score: 2, Informative

    a brief disclaimer, I am an american who has now been living in thailand for the last three years.

    Microsoft is just following what the game industry has been doing for the past few years here.

    The huge amount of pirated software and DVD's, and CD's at Pantip Plaza and other places around Thailand has actually caused the prices of the legitimate versions to drop dramatically. Piracy it seems does make a difference.

    I can get a legitimate copy of any top shelf PC game in thailand now for about 400 baht ($10 US). The only difference is it comes with a Thai manual and a huge sticker saying NOT FOR SALE OUTSIDE OF THAILAND.

    Buying a pirate copy of that same game costs: 150 baht per cd. (so if it's a 2 CD game, then the price is 300 baht for the pirate version. if it's a 4cd game it's MORE expensive to buy the pirate version!)

    Apparently the manufacturers think they can still make a profit selling games for $10 USD. They are actually trying to compete with pirates, rather than arrest them, and it seems to be working. People are buying more games, and less pirated ones.

    That's not to say if thailand wasn't blessed with an incredibly corrupt and ineffectual law enforcement, things wouldn't be different. ;)

  109. Hhmm. If crack sells, this must sell too? by Lighterup · · Score: 1

    hmmm, Do I smell money.

    1. Ask google for blessing
    Someone plz find the info on starter "cracks" license

    2. Find and Contact ms crack dealer in thailand. I am sure they speak english if they are educated. I somehow dought if ms offers same crack here for that price.

    3.Ship tons of cracks to us at crack rock bottom prices.

    3a. Is it slealing(or violating the law) if you just burn lots of copying your cut rate ms crack and sell it in the us, but send ms a check for the cost a (thai)license to ms?

    4.Profit!!!
    Most junkies will not care or will know the difference between regular ms crack and new improved ultra speacial(marketing) starter crack.

    4a.After costs and profits margin your geniune ms product should be cheaper than regular ms crack.

    5. Send me money
    Why not send some this way if it works for you.

    1. Re:Hhmm. If crack sells, this must sell too? by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1

      I believe this is known as the grey market. Various courts have upheld and dismissed claims against grey marketers, so I guess the question is do you want to have to spend all your profit on lawyers defending against Microsoft's Claim, regardless of whether you win in the end? Or god forbid, Lose?

  110. Hey, what happened to... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    "Windows XP: Reloaded"? I guess people started associating that with constantly reinstalling Windows

    1. Re:Hey, what happened to... by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      I thought that was actually marketingspeak for SP 2, which is after all much more than a bunch of patches.

  111. The Plus Pack by Booyakka+Joe · · Score: 1

    Bubbles - a XP theme with kittycats & shopping carts and of course Bubbles
    Julian - theme with Bacardi, Cola, and 'Vette's or 'Stangs
    Ricky - pot leaves & pepperoni

    "Cory & Trevor" and the "Mr. Leighey & Randy" themes will be comming soon.

    OMFG - I just posted about Trailerpark Boys, I might as well go over to my old mans and get drunk.

    --
    This is where I keep my clever quotes "" Yup I only got a pair, so I better not waste em!
  112. Re:So crime does pay then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This MS price/product change is aimed to Joe Consumer (or should I say Dong Consumer) not the Thai govt.

  113. Re:Difference? Free software kicks their ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ability to save?

  114. Re:Difference? Free software kicks their ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a fuckin' life

  115. Re:So crime does pay then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a note (I live in the big mango myself)

    1) dinner, with a beer: 80 Baht ($2)

    Worth noting is that 50-60 Baht is the beer! Luxary goods are very expensive c.f. everyday items.

    3) Taxi to the airport: 400 Baht ($10)

    Only if your a noob. ALWAYS take the meter - even if you have to take the expressway this should be 200 Baht.

    The average salary here is around 6-8000 Baht a month. So yes, 38 bucks is a fair portion of that.

    Have fun in BKK!

  116. Windows isn't an OS... by Kindaian · · Score: 1

    Windows is a ROAL (Reboot Oriented Application Launcher)

  117. Re:So crime does pay then? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    So what's your point? The linux distro made by the Thai government is aimed at Dong Consumer too.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  118. Re:So they really could make a stripped down versi by Ibanez · · Score: 1

    [blockquote][i]When will the US see a version of Windows that is JUST an Operating System? I wouldn't even mind it if they included a separate disk with 'bundled' but optional software, like a music player, a photo album tool, and maybe some video editing software... heck for the good PCs they could even include some sort of DVD authoring tool. [/i][/blockquote]

    Wait! Sounds familiar...Ah thats it...Mac OS X...

  119. Re:So crime does pay then? by whm · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the tip :) I'm leaving for the airport this afternoon, I'll keep it in mind!

  120. Re:(grammar *)syntax(c) grammar(english) || by zlel · · Score: 1

    ahhhh that's funny! Like Oxford got overruled or something.

  121. Re:Don't lose your head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aha, here we have a prejudiced superfacial elitist prick. A typical socialist :P

  122. Not to be blunt... by MoreDruid · · Score: 1

    but I keep reading these posts where people state they would gladly pay $38 for a copy of windows + office with less functionality. As some other poster mentioned, your $38 does not scale to their $38 (yearly mean income of Thailand is ~$2000 source)
    Anyway, what I don't get is why would you want to pay $38 for Windows when really buying a linux distro is more expensive?
    Now I know that it's bundled with tons of software and you can download Linux for free, don't get me wrong, but I think the end user doesn't have that much trust in that, and would rather buy a copy, especially if it says "support included" on the box. I know that these are the same people that just click on everything they see in IE but downloading and installing a complete operating system they don't know is frightening to them, and you can't blame them for that. Yes I know the installers have been getting better, but to a linux newbie a lot of things that are asked during the install are still power options. Take for instance your ISP connection. Well, the installer kindly offers you a few options: PPPoE, DHCP (including MAC spoofing) and whatnot. I wouldn't blame any newbie for not knowing this (hell, I don't even think half of /. knows exactly what these acronyms stand for), much less let them configure it properly.
    Back to topic: I don't mind shelling out some $$$ for an operating system (I bought SuSe, now use Debian though), but I think the main point is that Microsoft's products are just blatantly overpriced (along with a slew of other big software packages eg. Adobe Photoshop). I think if they lowered the price to a more reasonable level, a lot more people would be willing to stop pirating and start paying. What they'll lack in revenue for the high price will be easily compensated by the sheer volume of sold licences. Just my thoughts though.

    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  123. Re:LORF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Har har, you missed fp this time, loser.

    BTW, what other troll groups? Are you saying your particular group isn't a one man show? Who are you kidding? :D

  124. Where to Buy by Nomar · · Score: 2, Informative
    This has been mentioned already, but it's worth repeating for anyone looking for software in Thailand. The best place for software is Panthip Plaza (in Bangkok), despite the pseudo-crackdowns by the gov't on pirated goods that occur from time to time (depending on whatever trade agreement with the West is under consideration). The only difference you'll notice is the addition of cloak-and-dagger techniques to let you know what's available, whether that be guys not-so-chalantly sidling up to you to ask you if you want to buy a porno or vendors whisking you into a back room to look at their collection of DVDs, VCDs, music CDs, and software (in flipfiles of liners and inserts).

    The going rate for a CD of any kind was 150 baht (~$4) when I lived there two years ago. DVDs were 200 baht both then and when I visited back in January, so I'm guessing the CD price hasn't increased. There are so many vendors selling the same items and so many Thais buying that you don't have to worry about the price discrimination or poor bargaining skills. If it's in Thailand, it'll be at Panthip and you'll get the best price.

    MBK is a more convenient location, being right on the skytrain line, and prices are similar there, but selection is limited. Plus, you have to venture into the non-airconditioned portion of the mall and wade through a few thousand people selling cell phones.

    You'll see mostly music CDs and DVDs at tourist markets throughout the country, but you'll get tourist prices in most cases unless you can speak the local lingo. Even then getting a deal will be a problem because the vendors know they can sell to the next tourist without bargaining.

    Anyway, if you're looking for something out of the ordinary or buying in bulk, it's worth going to Panthip...unless the girl who broke your heart has opened a shop there.

    chok dee

  125. A rose by any other name by jaghatarjankare · · Score: 1

    Cheap shit is still shit.

  126. Re:So crime does pay then? by Alsee · · Score: 1

    One night in Bangkok, room and board: $14
    One night in Bangkok, RIAA physical CD: $15
    One night in Bangkok, RIAA CD download: $16

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  127. Re:So they really could make a stripped down versi by Alsee · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that MS wasn't able to make a version of Windows without all the bells and whistels

    Right. The stripped down version has all the bells and whistles, IE, Media Player, all the critical elements of the operating system.

    It's the other stuff that's stripped down.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  128. ATTN Stupid Mod by nusuth · · Score: 1
    How about a demonstration? Delete glibc and reboot. Since it is statically linked, you shouldn't have any problems with absence of libc until you compile something.

    I would like to see the demonstration performed not by the obvious troll AC but idiot mod who gave a +1 Informative to that.

    A typical linux system has a few things statically linked to glibc (stuff under /sbin and few others) but everything else is dynamically linked. I've heard some brain-dead distros dynamic link even sbin! Whether a given package manager is staticaly or dynamicly linked is irrelevant as there is bound to be some program dynamicly using glibc at that instant and this upgradability is not glibc specific.

    Are NOT moderations available yet?

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

    1. Re:ATTN Stupid Mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing is certain: There is not enough stuff statically linked to get the system running after a reboot, and neither to get the new version installed after uninstalling the old one. That's why the package manager uninstalls and installs in one go, because if it stops, it won't start up again.

  129. Starter edition...hmm... by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 1

    But CDs don't burn too well in my fireplace.
    What's next, the Kindling Edition?
    Where are the marshmallows?

  130. This is only good by TakaIta · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why most people are bashing MS about this. This is only good. Now imagine that MS is going to offer a Windows version for free. MS could maybe still make enough profit from their other products. Or what would happen if MS would publish Windows 98 under the GPL. For many users, Windows 98 is good enough, it would need some upgrades to support newer hardware. Now THAT would mean real competition for Linux. I don't see Linux winning that, at least not for the consumers market. Linux is still an OS for nerds, not for the average user who only wants a PC to work and finds no joy at all in making it work. Only few Linux adapts do see that consumers choose Windows because it's easier, more user friendly, supports more programs, gives fewer installation trouble etc etc. The downside of the security holes and the price is just a small argument compared to these advantages. Now if the price argument will disappeare then there's no way Linux is going to win any share on the consumer market as long as it stays a nerd OS. MS profits are going to drop because they won't have any income from selling OSes to consumers, but maybe the company can handle that profit drop. The Linux developers should see this as a challenge to focus on consumer friendliness, now that the development of Linux has caused MS to lower its prices for OSes. This is only good for consumers.

    1. Re:This is only good by tachum · · Score: 1

      I disagree with a lot of the premises in this post. It is often assumed that linux is for nerds. I did an experiment with my mother-in-law (whom I am very fond of, by the way). She had NO computer experience, and I set her up with MDK10 and an HP printer. She has no troubles in finding her way around. After 4 months, she can:
      Start up the box
      connect to the net with ppp
      download her emails with KMail
      reply to emails.
      separate attachments to /home
      print emails
      write letters on OpenOffice
      save them in her /home/documents folder
      attach documents to an email and send
      print documents,including selections of pages.
      navigate to the floppy and Cd drive.
      open a browser and type a URL.
      Search google.
      She is trying to get a high score in card games.

      My mother in law is 72 years of age. She isn't really interested in compiling applications from source. I doubt there will be a lot more she will want to do, but she may surprise me. She would now like a scanner.

      Noone told her linux was for nerds. Noone told her it is unfriendly. She just did what she needed to do to a particular task.

      She is a retired pensioner on a limited income. Her second hand computer cost $A450 (the price for no OS) and we gave her the printer for Christmas.
      Everything on her PC is fully licensed. She has a fully functioning firewall.

      And finally, does anyone realy want to make comparisons between installing W2k and Mandrake 10??

    2. Re:This is only good by TakaIta · · Score: 1
      >> I disagree with a lot of the premises in this post.

      You disagree (at least in your post) on one point: Linux is for nerds.

      I believe that once you got a Linux box running, it's ok, especially for basic activities. But installing it is more troublesome then installing Windows. Also if you go and buy a game for your PC (which many people do at least once), you buy a Windows game, and it is questionable whether you can get it running on Linux at all. I have also read for example this recent article which shows that it isn't that easy to make Linux print just as fast as in Windows. At least not with any printer.

      My point is however not to disgrace Linux (quite on the contrary, I am pleased that something like Linux exists), but
      1) to argue that a cheaper (or even free) Windows OS is an interesting idea.
      2) to say that the bashing of MS with every move that this company makes is pointless, predictable and very boring.

  131. In germany we have a word for this... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    ...anfixen! (dunno how to say it in english... sorry, try dict.leo.org or google... ;)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  132. slight correction about Windows reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows can update files in place. To do so, you would simply unlink the file without deleting it, and put a new one in its place. You could clean it up later after it went out of use. This is the Linux approach.

    The problem is that you can then get multiple versions of system libraries in use simultaneously. That seems acceptable, since they provide the same interface, but there are several cases where it might not be. You might be replacing a library for a security or stability bug fix. Keeping a library in use perpetually (say for a server application) until it crashes or is compromised would be undesireable. Windows won't do that, but Linux may. Second is the possibility for incompatibilities. Although the interface is the same, there may be data structures passed to the user application that have to be passed back. If a library is unloaded then loaded again, or if the data structure is passed around, it may be used by the alternate library version. Since the data structure layout is internal, the implementation may change without changing the interface, and the results of using different versions of a library with the same data structure may be bad.

    The approaches taken are typical of the differences between Windows and Linux. Windows is more concerned with safety, but may force the user to take unpalatable action (a reboot in this case) in order to ensure safety. Linux is more concerned with flexibility, but users are given enough rope to hang themselves. If you upgrade your libc or other system libraries, you should restart all long lived system processes in order to avoid problems from old or conflicting library versions.

    1. Re:slight correction about Windows reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The approaches taken are typical of the differences between Windows and Linux. Windows is more concerned with safety, but may force the user to take unpalatable action (a reboot in this case) in order to ensure safety. Linux is more concerned with flexibility, but users are given enough rope to hang themselves. If you upgrade your libc or other system libraries, you should restart all long lived system processes in order to avoid problems from old or conflicting library versions.

      Ah - so that's why Windows/Outlook Express allows you to run e-mail attachments when double-clicking on them (yes, it is partly a Windows problem - it doesn't distinguish between programs and documents). And that's why IE allows websites to install software onto your system. And that's why... but you get the point.

  133. what distro do they use? by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1

    I'm interested in knowing what distro they use the most?

  134. Not that kind by perdu · · Score: 1
    With about 95% of the country being Buddhist at least they're already familiar with the concept of suffering
    True, but the Buddha renounced the practice of adding to your suffering by hurting or depriving yourself!

    --
    You only use 2% of your DNA
  135. I want skeleton version by timts · · Score: 1

    then I will install all the freeware windows software to enhance it, actually it would be a lot better than windows xp home any way

  136. Re:We're throwing gnomes in the glasshouse by juhaz · · Score: 1

    We can't laugh at MS for this anymore thanks to gconf in the gnome project.

    Really? Since, as others have stated, registry hasn't got anything to do at all with this problem. Quite contrary, it notifies app if a setting changes so you can actually pick up new settings easier without resorting to polling...

    It's like the windows registry, only obfiscated

    I guess you mean it's like the windows registry, only UN-obfuscated. After all, no matter how "strange xml variant" it uses, it's well organized and human readable, unlike the monolithic binary kludge several megs of size that is registry...

    can only modify it reliably with poorly documented command line tools. There's a pretty little GUI that looks like a registry editor, shows you the keys but won't let you modify them.

    False. Gconf-editor (the gui tool) DOES let you modify things. It also has a nice long string description (localized, too) of most keys, and is much better organized so it's not even cryptic, like registry, things are easier to find and much easier to know what they do.

    I know some gnome people like the MS way of doing things, but it seems to be going a bit far.

    I know some people knee-jerk at every thing MS has ever done, no matter if the idea itself is actually bad or no, but that seems to be going a bit far. Just because MS has screwed, corruption prone GIGANTIC implementation of registry that stores EVERYTHING and it's mother doesn't mean that the concept of registry like system is invalid!

    It really is a lot simpler to put things under /etc or ~/.gnomethan in some strange XML variant that is hidden under ~/.gnome anyway.

    Well, no, it's not. You can't get change notifications from dotfiles, you can't get multiple apps reading and changing them without all kinds of nasty locking problems, you can't create a tweak-ui like gui with a collection for most wanted "hidden" settings without knowing how to parse kazillion trillion different kinds of configuration files, you can't get regedit/gconf-editor like relatively simple tool for much easier option changing than having to hunt a simple, not always well named conf file and learning it's syntax, sysadmin can't change mandatory or default values as easily.

    And it doesn't have to be XML, gconf is written so backends can be added modularly, you could use LDAP or even RDBMS remote server for storing preferences, roaming profiles... heck, for masochists like you someone could write an ini-file backend.

    I grant you that gconf - despite being vastly better than windows registry - has it's own share of problems, but they are implementation problems, the idea of simple shared config system is good.

  137. Yeah, this will work.... by hemolack · · Score: 1
    I've been to Thailand a couple of times, the latest trip being the end of May / beginning of June. My father-in-law (who lives in Bangkok) said to me, "While you're here, is there any software you need? We can get you any software you want for under 500 baht." Which is roughly $12.50 US. I declined the offer because:

    I use Linux and OpenOffice

    I can't read Thai yet These are not stupid people awaiting Microsoft to swoop down from Nirvana with discounted Operating Systems. Piracy is not a problem in Asia ... it's an entire freakin' INDUSTRY.
    Microsoft has no idea what they're getting into.

  138. Re:So crime does pay then? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    One night in Bangkok: Hard man becomes humble.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  139. "Stripped down?" Isn't that "impossible?" by cfoster70 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find it odd that when the Justice Department said they wanted Explorer unbundled it was 'impossible,' but now that MS has spotted a new revenue stream suddenly they can hack out huge chunks of the operating system?

  140. Ah yes, the ugly redheaded stepchild... by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...that is Millenium Edition!

    I followed the link and was amused by the "don't miss" section at the bottom. ALL the links are things like "get Windows XP now" and "the benefits of XP" and "see the great reviews of XP here!".

    There is also a link on that page to the amusing Windows ME support page there. The TOP article in the support archive? "How to UNinstall Windows ME"! Apparently the removal of WinME is a commonly suggested remedy by Microsoft to fix a PC that won't boot properly.

    I'd have to say that that is one point where I actually agree strongly with Microsoft!

  141. Try some research by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Read my journal and it should answer your question.

    If you still dont understand the true meaning of the amendment afterwards, then i suggest you refrain from calling others 'morons'.

    Have a nice day.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  142. US users should get the best pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this just like the phamaceutical industry where we pay the highest prices in the world, but we (all US taxpaypayers) paid for a lot of the R&D. If we are to compete against third world countries, our home-grown products need to be CHEAP (not the same price) as overseas.

    what gives?

  143. slashdot - usenet interface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys, we got us a top-poster!

  144. Stupidest thing I've ever read, ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You said: All you have to do is click the next button once or twice to install your hardware drivers, provided you have to install them at all? YOU LAZY FUCK, YOU SHOULD HAVE TO SPEND HOURS CONFIGURING YOUR SHIT, I DID, AND IT MADE ME FEEL SMART.

    Seriously. Christ.

  145. Re:We're throwing gnomes in the glasshouse by dbIII · · Score: 1
    False. Gconf-editor (the gui tool) DOES let you modify things
    Which version implemented this? Is this version only available in CVS or has it had a wider release?
    gconf is written so backends can be added modularly
    Good, so something sane like berkeley db can be used apart from the format which until recently (if you are correct) was only changeable with undocumented hacks. There are/were a lot of keys you just couldn't get to any other way.
    heck, for masochists like you someone could write an ini-file backend.
    Now now, play nice. I certainly did think of doing something that would import gconf settings into a text file to allow editing and portability of gpanel settings some time back - but the answer was to simply use kpanel once I got a rough idea of the tangled mess gconf was at the time from the little documentation I could get.

    Copying the animated paperclip, the windows registry, Microsoft OLE and the DOS directory structure are not necessarily good ideas.

  146. Re:We're throwing gnomes in the glasshouse by juhaz · · Score: 1

    Which version implemented this? Is this version only available in CVS or has it had a wider release?

    Well, there's a CVS commit with comment " Added support for editing keys, adding new keys, and unsetting keys." dated 2.5 years ago, no idea which version that corresponds to, but it's been quite a while since that anyway. So I'm guessing you must be referring to something else entirely... lists, default and mandatory settings couldn't be changed until recently (in CVS, about 2 to 5 weeks ago).

    Good, so something sane like berkeley db

    You mean something like this? It's long since been removed though, simply because nobody used it.

    can be used apart from the format which until recently (if you are correct) was only changeable with undocumented hacks. There are/were a lot of keys you just couldn't get to any other way.

    I wouldn't exactly call 2½ years "recently" but whatever, and those command line tools are not anywhere neal the level of "undocumented hacks" even if they do (did? seemed fine for the very simple thing they do last time I checked) not have the best documentation. And if you're going to use bdb-API (I sure hope you weren't planning to db_dump, text edit and db_load) you are doing "hacks" anyway, why not go trought the gconf itself?

  147. Re:We're throwing gnomes in the glasshouse by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Well, there's a CVS commit with comment " Added support for editing keys, adding new keys, and unsetting keys." dated 2.5 years ago,
    Well, it certainly never made it into redhat9 - which was a very gnome-centric distribution, and is not that old.
    lists, default and mandatory settings couldn't be changed until recently (in CVS, about 2 to 5 weeks ago).
    This response illustrates my point far better than anything I've said. How many years has gconf been around? I would have thought that configuration of a configuration system would be a higher proirity than crafting a windows GUI registry editor lookalike - but that's looking from a perspective where everything can be a file and a web browser is an application and not part of the OS.

    Obviously I should take another look at gconf in CVS and see if settings are actually portable now (ie. able to change paths for gpanel objects now - and heaven forbid, perhaps actually use it on a multi-user system and copy things from one registry to another). That is assuming that gpanel will support the new format and that not too much will break.

    It's long since been removed though, simply because nobody used it.
    Well, it is very much an old school unix style of things, and if the gnome developers were like that they would have started with flat files before progressing to a database, instead of starting with the then trendy XML thing, which defeated the whole purpose of XML by only being changeable by gconftool/gconftool-1/gconftool-2. The whole idea of a windows registry for unix, and one for every user implies that they were not thinking that way at all. A secure multiuser database is not a difficult thing to do, but the nature of gconf implies that such a thing was not considered - the aim appears to be for people sitting in front of a PC that only they use. The whole process saving idea of a configation daemon informing processes when a change has occured to configuration is not a bad idea - but even the average *nix workstation or home computer is multiuser with things like spam filters and print spoolers going on as different users. To be considered more than a toy for keeping track of icon positions such a configuration system should at least be multiuser.

    I remain unconvinced that it is not just a poor copy of the windows registry editor GUI with a trendy but flawed XML back end which has been adopted too early by some high profile projects like gpanel.

  148. Re:We're throwing gnomes in the glasshouse by juhaz · · Score: 1

    Well, it certainly never made it into redhat9 - which was a very gnome-centric distribution, and is not that old.

    I'm pretty sure it DID make it into RH9, but certainly not going to install that one to check...

    lists, default and mandatory settings couldn't be changed until recently (in CVS, about 2 to 5 weeks ago).

    This response illustrates my point far better than anything I've said. How many years has gconf been around? I would have thought that configuration of a configuration system would be a higher proirity than crafting a windows GUI registry editor lookalike - but that's looking from a perspective where everything can be a file and a web browser is an application and not part of the OS.


    Really? Isn't it just the opposite: the GUI registry editor lookalike is indeed a lower priority than the underlying configuration system and that's exactly it took a long time to implement those in that gui thingy? Anyway, looks like I was wrong about lists, gconf-editor in FC2 does support them and is older than 2 to 5 weeks.

    Defaults and mandatory settings are for sysadmins, usually one-time thing after installation and are probably scripted anyway so nobody missed gui for them, easily doable with command line tools.

    Well, it is very much an old school unix style of things, and if the gnome developers were like that they would have started with flat files before progressing to a database, instead of starting with the then trendy XML thing

    You can't get much farther from old school style of things than having one big database file that stores preferences of every application! XML tree is somewhere in middle ground between of that and flat files.

    which defeated the whole purpose of XML by only being changeable by gconftool/gconftool-1/gconftool-2.

    I really can't see what's supposed to be so unchangeable, but just in case, gconf developers agree, simplification of the XML format is on TODO.

    gconf is, indeed, by it's very nature for storing only user preferences, instead of every last setting on system, if that's the same thing as "toy for keeping track of icon positions", I do not know, system-wide daemon (instead of each having own gconfd process, I assume) however seems to also be on that list...

    Neither the registry editor lookalike GUI nor xml backend are the main focus, they can be changed, or removed, but the fact that apps have a consistent and easy to use API that implements necessary things for reading and storing configuration.

    But it's obviously at least partly a matter of taste, and you can't convince someone who doesn't want to be convinced, I didn't intend this to be a semi-religious flamewar, just needed to point out that "gconf != need to reboot"

  149. Re:We're throwing gnomes in the glasshouse by dbIII · · Score: 1
    I'm pretty sure it DID make it into RH9
    Certain trumps pretty sure every time - hence my having to muck about with gconftool-1 gconftool-2 without any docs after attempting to change a path using the GUI tool, looking at the docs that came with it and seeing that it is read only.
    easily doable with command line tools
    That is assuming the command line tools have documentation, or if the comments in the source let you know what is going on.
    database .. can't get much farther from old school style of things
    What I meant is that instead of using an existing, seperate application of proven worth with multiple ways of accessing it, a shiny new trendy XML based thing (without the benefit of accessability which is why we started to use XML in the first place) was used. The objective changed from a configuration daemon to an exercise in developing a new proprietry product (ie. only use stuff invented here) - only one where the source is available.
    gconf is, indeed, by it's very nature for storing only user preferences ... "toy for keeping track of icon positions"
    What if another user wants their gpanel to look just like someone elses? That's the thing that made me look at gconf in the first place. With almost any other application developed on a multi-user operating sytem it would be a trivial exercise, but with gconf of Redhat9 vintage it looked as if I would have to write my own back end to it just to change a few paths.
    needed to point out that "gconf != need to reboot"
    Once again the MS windows heritage shines through - it should never been seen as a big deal that something in user space can be restarted without a reboot.