Slashdot Mirror


Tech Support Levels Dropping

NeoPrime writes "USA Today is reporting on the growing concern of the language barrier, when it comes to tech support. It appears that each year it is becoming more compelling to companies to reconsider the use of overseas help desks. According to this story, based '[o]n a 10-point scale, the average level rated by desktop owners dropped from 7.0 in 2003 to 6.3 this year; notebooks fell from 7.2 to 6.1.'"

531 comments

  1. Marketing Dweeb Double Speak by CaptainZapp · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Sony's general manager of Vaio Service Operations, Steven Nickel, says the company has recently changed support partners who "weren't meeting stringent requirements." And managers who monitor live calls remotely from support headquarters in Fort Myers, Fla., can now intervene in a case as necessary, via instant messages.

    Wow! Could it be that Mr. Nickel is speaking with a forked tongue? I can't speak for Sony worldwide, but the domestic support organisation has an image which is somewhere between SCO and Rambus.

    Case in point: A friend of mine bought a VAIO, which never really worked. After the third repair attempt he got it back with a hole in the case, requiring a nasty letter from his lawyer until they finally reimbursed him. That was after accusing him of breaking it himself.

    Does Mr. Nickel mean they changed their service model from driving a screwdriver through the computer to let it splatter on concrete from the 5th floor or wot?

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

    1. Re:Marketing Dweeb Double Speak by Emil+Brink · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just as a counter-point, I own a Sony DSC-P1 digital camera. I bought it at Fry's on a business trip to Califoria back in 2001.

      During subsequent years, the camera (or its battery) developed a problem; it wouldn't "hold a charge", but would instead signal being fully charged, and then drop to empty/no charge from mere minutes of use. It was useless.

      I surfed around, and one day I found this note about the problem. It's on a (as far as I know, I'm not a regular) US site, and I'm in Sweden with a camera bought three years ago in a diferent country, and without any warranty cards or anything sent in.

      I thought "what the heck", and e-mailed Sony about it. That's right, I just wrote a question to "info@sony.se", describing my situation and linking to the above page (or maybe Sony's page about the problem, which seems to be gone now). Writing to a general "info" address of a major multinational felt almost silly, in an "of course I won't get a reply" kind of way. But, what can I say; I got a reply within 24 hours! It was from their service representatives here, asking me to send the camera to them, including all accessories. No questions asked.

      I did so, and in one week I got it back, with a new battery (that's a $50 value right there, approximately), new charger, a replaced power port in the camera body, and upgraded firmware. The cost to me was the postage to get the camera to the service techs, approx $8 or so.

      So, I guess my point is that Sony are surely capable of excellent service, too!

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    2. Re:Marketing Dweeb Double Speak by Mateito · · Score: 1

      That is why Sweden is near the top on all the quality of living surveys.

      You guys may pay some of the highest taxes in the world, but in (my limited experience) it seems that the fundamental respect for other people, lost in so many other countries, still exists.

    3. Re:Marketing Dweeb Double Speak by W2k · · Score: 1

      This happened to me with HP. FWIW, I also live in Sweden.

      Some years ago, I got a rather old Hewlett-Packard PDA from work, one of the first models to have the "PocketPC" version of the Windows CE operating system. Greyscale monitor. No-one else at work wanted it because it only had a US-style connector on the AC adapter (wall-wart), and the battery had been empty for months. It seemed the only way to get it working was to buy a new AC adapter (a quick websearch turned up that this was grossly expensive, not uncommon for spare parts for old PDA's) or to buy a 240V->110V power converter with US-style power sockets. Which would be even more expensive.

      Not seeing any other way, I mail some generic HP tech support adress, explain that I have a PDA with an american AC adapter, and ask them if they will kindly send me a replacement power supply. I provide my home address. Two days later it shows up, sent by UPS 24h Express from HP in Amsterdam. No invoice, nothing. But the PDA served me well for years on after.

      --
      Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    4. Re:Marketing Dweeb Double Speak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this service only in Sweden.

      In the US, I was trying to replace a broken LCD cable which was inside a friend's Sony VAIO laptop.

      I called Sony and they said since the unit is more than 1-year old, it would be a $30 charge to talk with technical support *just to get the part number* for the cable.

      I hung up, and told him to sell the VAIO and get a Thinkpad...he did and he's been happy ever since.

    5. Re:Marketing Dweeb Double Speak by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      Sony has earned a bad repuation in many areas, but their camera support is generally first-class. I have a friend who is a photography buff, and bought one of their low end pro level cameras used (it's a few thousand new). The camera was out of warranty but when it broke he called Sony anyway, and they repaired it for free.

    6. Re:Marketing Dweeb Double Speak by ewen · · Score: 1

      I too have a Sony DSC-P1 with that type of problem with (now) three batteries -- the batteries (with some effort) will usually charge up, often claim "80 minutes" or "90 minutes", but generally will be unusable after a few minutes (a bit longer if the LCD isn't on). The replacement batteries seem to work better for a while, but developed the same problem over the course of 3-6 months.

      The impression that I got from the Sony Style shop staff was that "this happens" and that the batteries were only good for a few dozen recharges (which makes usage Rather Expensive (tm) considering they're about $200 a battery here).

      I'd pretty much concluded it'd be cheaper to buy a new camera -- and definitely not a Sony one -- until I saw your post. Alas it appears from the link that Sony's offer seems to have ended about 4 months ago, and seems to apply only in the US. Sigh.

      I'm curious though. After all the replacement bits did your new battery/charger/etc end up having the same problem after some months?

      Ewen

    7. Re:Marketing Dweeb Double Speak by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      Well, this only happened this spring, and I haven't been using the camera heavily during summer. But for what it's worth, I'd say it's as good as new, or maybe even better. Still only 80-90 minutes on a full charge, but if I leave the camera for a week and come back, the battery isn't flat.

      I'm sorry to hear you've been given the "cold shoulder", since the problem from my point of view is an honest bug/design error in the original product. Sony confessed by starting the service program, which ended about a week after I first heard about it.

      It's going to be interesting during the (rapidly approaching) Swedish fall/winter to see how it behaves. I formed a theory that it was the cold that killed the old battery, before I realized it was flawed to begin with... Hopefully there is no major degradation once the temperature drops a bit...

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  2. Free Market Capitalism by SirStanley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The curse of free markets is that things like Out sourcing can happen, taking american jobs away. However, the market has ways of resolving things it self. You take a relatively minimaly skilled job like Tech support, ship it over seas to even cheaper labor and you get your ass bitten.

    What has happened here is the market provided a cheaper means, but at a cost (Customer satisfication) so hopefully, companies will fix this problem by moving these jobs back to where ever they originally were.

    --
    --------========+++Dont Feed The Lab Techs+++========--------
    1. Re:Free Market Capitalism by farnz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, the highest profit margin customers are the ones with most options when it comes to changing for better service; if your quality of service drops too low, it's worth your competitors' time competing for high-margin customers on quality of service rather than price.

    2. Re:Free Market Capitalism by ceeam · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why is it ok to import sneakers and t-shirts from cheap Phillipine workers and importing "office jobs" is not?

    3. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The curse of free markets is that things like Out sourcing can happen, taking american jobs away.
      Why is it specifically a `curse' that Americans lose jobs? Those jobs mean people in a much poorer country can finally make a living.

      Isn't the real curse of outsourcing that multinationals get to pollute and exploit the population of whichever developing country is the most desperate? Setting up a call centre in India is pretty benign by comparison.

      Posting as AC because I'll probably be modded flamebait...

    4. Re:Free Market Capitalism by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      So, by your example, capitalism leads to a U.S. economy consisiting of the uber-rich on one hand and professional data butlers (aka domestic tech support) on the other, while true middle-class development and engineering (related to manufacturing) jobs go to China and India, respectively.

      That's what a service economy means! Thanks for clearing that up.

    5. Re:Free Market Capitalism by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is it ok to import sneakers and t-shirts from cheap Phillipine workers and importing "office jobs" is not?

      Not to mention things like ketchup...
      Anyway, the reason it becomes an issue here is because a good number of people that sit at their desk reading Slashdot all day are tech support people. The jobs have the same level of turnover and pay roughly the same in the US, but some people still prefer a shitty low-paying job at a desk to a shitty low-paying job behind a counter or stove, and almost all people would prefer a shitty low-paying job behind a desk to looking for a new job with that shitty low-paying job on their resume.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    6. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would rather spend a few more bucks for an item that was made in the USA. I'm not usually given that choice.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    7. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      However, the market has ways of resolving things it self.

      And in the meantime you have people choosing between food and heating oil. Or working at a gas station to make ends meet. Or both.

      Yay. Capitalism

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    8. Re:Free Market Capitalism by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why is it specifically a `curse' that Americans lose jobs? Those jobs mean people in a much poorer country can finally make a living.

      It's a curse for anybody to lose a job.

      I certainly agree that the pollution and exploitation represent the worst end of the spectrum.

      The fundamental problem with all outsourcing though happens when the country exporting the labor is still not able to develop the local economy. Example, people in india get good jobs programming or doing tech support for U.S. companies. These workers now want the various trappings of geek life and can now afford them. So, they buy all of that from Asia and the U.S. Oops, there goes the local economy. At the same time, their pay has no hope of scaling to the point where those goods have the same real cost to them as they do in the U.S. since as soon as their pay gets to that point, the outsourcing will shift somewhere else, leaving a country full of highly skilled workers who can't find work.

      If India really wants to build it's economy on tech, local companies will need to start producing tech with the costs and prices scaled to the local economy. Anything else is just ba dotcom style bubble that is sure to burst just when things start looking really good.

      All that said, that doesn't mean the outsourcing is actually BAD for India, it COULD provide the tempory boost needed to bootstrap the local economy. Of course, as soon as that process starts, U.S. corps will try to pull a quick switch and outsource elsewhere before they accidentally fund the company that will later eat their lunch.

    9. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why is it ok to import sneakers and t-shirts from cheap Phillipine workers and
      > importing "office jobs" is not?

      They're both OK.

      Anyway, there's a shortage of Americans right now (http://cryptome.org/mil-dead-iqw.htm) so we need to make up the slack somehow! :)

    10. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Eamon+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone who brings up "free markets" during a discussion about outsourcing needs to take an economics class. In a free market, it's true that jobs can move overseas... but so can the people seeking them. There is no free market, and as long as money buys influence, there never will be.

      Not that I care much about tech support jobs, but I'm getting *really* tired of these uninformed libertarian rants.

    11. Re:Free Market Capitalism by stuph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because my t-shirts don't fall apart when I ask them to do something they don't have a script for (like using an old one to wax my car)

      --
      --Less Thinkin', More Drinkin'...
    12. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your cheap t-shirt is not running your company.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    13. Re:Free Market Capitalism by jlusk4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The new geeks in India aren't *just* buying their electronics from Asia.

      Presumably, they dine out more often.

      Or, they hire cooks, maids, drivers.

      They buy nicer and more clothes, which, even if not manufactured locally, are delivered by local truckers and stevedores and sold by people working in retail outlets.

      They build bigger houses and pay more taxes.

      Presumably, they give more to charity (based on what I've heard about lower-income and formerly-lower-income people in the U.S. tending to give more to charity than upper-income folks, as a percentage of income).

      And, when their countries threaten nuclear war w/each other, the big multinationals call 'em up and say "Friends, we're going to have find another back office if you're going to do that."

      So, we're exporting jobs, opportunity, world peace, hope, Mom and apple pie. Who could argue with that? Think of the children!

      Ok, so I got progressively more sarcastic in the preceding paragraph, but seriously.... It's like giving blood. You lose some, the other party gets what they need.

      That's not to say it isn't painful. And it is sure irritating when you see those gains go into some corrupt person's pocket. But you have to hope humans' universal desire for justice will eventually prevail (and corruption will be eliminated), as more and more countries get with the "civilized society" program. (I equate civilization with compassion, not just politely ripping somebody off.)

      Here's another angle on corruption, from the economic point of view: it's friction, isn't it? Businesses would prefer not to pay bribes, I bet. Or rather, they'd prefer to keep their expenses predictable, and not greater than their competitor's expenses (i.e., some semblance of "fair").

      So, I think the question is not "how can we stop this?" but rather "how can we help this along, so things become fair more quickly?"

      Is it better to say "you can't have our jobs until your environment is clean" or is it better to say "here, have some jobs; now please take your new money and spend some of it on cleaning up your environment and implementing new laws"?

      Gee, I hope this wasn't a page of nothing. Sorry if it was.

      John.

    14. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      Also I think in many cases it's not so much a problem of capitalism but of making wrong business decisions due to bad data.

      The problem is the way the costs are measured. It's relatively easy to measure the costs of internal sys admins and tech support. Then you compare that to the amount an outside company charges, as it's less money you go for that. However typically the problem is, that as soon as you outsource many support and admin tasks are no longer taken care of - they don't fall under whatever contract the oursource company has (1). Instead these tasks are picked up by more or less knowledgable staff who are hired for different tasks. Often these are less efficient and more expensive (per hour) than the guys who used to do handle the job full time.

      Additional costs can occur due to less efficiently administered networks, machines which run slower because they aren't properly set up etc.

      (1) In one case I was on a contract for a company which hadn't organized a workstation for me yet (ok, that's stupid enough in itself). I could do nothing for them at all. So I brought in a laptop - cool, but the sysadmin (3rd party) refused to hook it up on the intranet. Not because of security concerns (which would be understandable to an extent) but because of his company's contract which said "support for customer machines only". Our customer faced paying $105/hour for 3 days of me sitting there, being unable to contribute much. So another engineer with root access hooked me up. Of course neither his work, nor the time I had to wait ever made it into "admin costs" which could be measured.

    15. Re:Free Market Capitalism by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's natural to see techsupport folks are always the one complaining about the offshoring since they are the most vocal.

      Developers and hardcore engineers typically don't talk as much. As a result management will be happy to cash out on the quiet group. Off shoring them positions else where. I am not saying there is no good developers offshore, I am just saying developers are the easiet social target for management to pick on. Human Resource 101.

    16. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm...

      India's local economy is growing at 7% at year.

    17. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the bulk of the money being spent on Indian outsourced labor is being spent on AMERICAN companies like SITEL and Client Logic.

      I know SITEL likes to boast about thier Mumbai, India facility and really loves to praise offshoring as often as they can in thier publically accessable quarterly newsletter.

      I'd be more comfortable with Indian offshoring if I knew there was an Indian at the top making most of the money, not some already rich American businessman.

    18. Re:Free Market Capitalism by MattyCobb · · Score: 1

      Why is it specifically a `curse' that Americans lose jobs? Those jobs mean people in a much poorer country can finally make a living.

      Hmm... well, gee... I'd imagine its because people don't like losing their job... espically in a much wealthier country (like the US) where it cost a lot more to live... that can sometimes push people's buttons. espically when those moving the jobs to other countries get big tax writeoffs and end up providing the now unemployed with worse service than before via thier new unintelligable replacements. its not like this big companies are moving a call center to India to improve the economic conditions there. They are doing it for the money. Because in India they can say to hell with benefits, pay them next to nothing, not have to worry about little things like air conditioning and break rooms etc.


      Posting as AC because I'll probably be modded flamebait...

      Why is it specifically a `curse' that Trollers lose karma? Those lost points mean people who flame them can finally get modded up.

      Just had to do it ;)

      --

      Matt
      You have 1 Moderator Point! Use it or lose it! Is that a threat? -vapid
    19. Re:Free Market Capitalism by sjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All of those good things you mentioned are what I would consider part of the bootstrapping. However, just as the dot-com boom was a great booster for delivery truck drivers, and office furnature makers (until the real estate prices drove service people into shelters anyway), and the dot-bomb took it all away (except the real-estate prices), if India doesn't develop that stimulus into a full economy at all levels, it will be sustained only until outsourcing shifts to somewhere cheaper.

      How many of those maids, truckers, waiters, etc will STILL have a decent job when the outsourcing moves on?

      On the other hand, if India builds local INDUSTRY (not just service), it has a chance to sustain itself even after outsourcing goes away.

      The really interesting question is what will happen if there is DOUBLE outsourcing. That is Indian companies set themselves up as outsource providers, then set up call centers elsewhere for even lower pay?

    20. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a curse for anybody to lose a job.

      Really?

      Suppose, for a moment, and purely hypothetically, that employment is a zero-sum game.

      Is it better for one American to have one of the limited number of jobs on offer, while three Indians starve - or is it better for those three Indians to share the American's job, while the American starves?

      If you have trouble deciding, try reading it again with "Indian" and "American" reversed, it might make it easier for you to make up your mind.

    21. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the time I would agree with you, except for cars. The quality of American cars is just pathetic. Give me a Japanese car any day.

    22. Re:Free Market Capitalism by sjames · · Score: 1

      Is it better for one American to have one of the limited number of jobs on offer, while three Indians starve - or is it better for those three Indians to share the American's job, while the American starves?

      Will the American celebrate the success of the 3 Indians, or will he curse? Wouldn't it be better still to EXPAND the job market to accomodate all 4?

      That's the point, it's always a curse when an opportunity for a net gain situation gets turned into a zero-sum.

      In summary, YES, REALLY!

    23. Re:Free Market Capitalism by AlgoRhythm · · Score: 1

      Quickly:

      I agree with most of what you said, but regarding the job creating you mention it's worth noting that those are, all of them, service jobs.

      Service jobs are not really beneficial for building a local economy because they don't create wealth, they feed off of it. If there is no wealth creation in the form of manufacturing, programming for local businesses, agriculture and cetera, their economy will remain dependent upon foreign companies who could destroy the foundation by simply picking up and moving elsewhere.

      Not to mention the fact that service jobs usually suck for the person performing them.

    24. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fair more quickly"? Bite my butt.

      If you want to help India, there's nothing wrong with that. But you should NOT help India by screwing over service workers in the U.S. (or any other country). Helping Joe by mugging Tom is not a good deed, it's a crime.

      If you want to develop third-world countries, kill the agribusiness subsidies and let them start with farming (like everyone else did). Or let them start their own manufacturing industries, product industries, and so forth. Let them make things for us to BUY, we'll import them, and they'll get their hand up without simultaneously smacking anyone else down.

      There's a big difference between a country supplying some physical material and a country stealing another country's jobs. I'm all for you competing with me in the market over your products, but you try and take my job, and I'm going for your throat.

      Think it over.

    25. Re:Free Market Capitalism by budgenator · · Score: 1

      if India builds local INDUSTRY
      Sorry to burst your bubble but India is simply too big and too poor for these service jobs to have any net effect. Even the Indians spending money to learn english well enough to hold these jobs know that the jobs will not help India and will get transfered to some other place even poorer eventualy. If these companies have no loyalty to their local workers, they're not going to have any for Indians either.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    26. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, communism is much better. No bread at all. And then you get sent to Siberia to be "reeducated."

    27. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the problem is that accountants are missing a lobe in their brains that allow them to qualitatively determine the value of something (by the way this is the same lobe that makes a person interesting).

    28. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really wasnt a page of nothing, but there was much cluelessness in it. It is ok to outsource the lower skilled jobs overseas (but dont forget stupid people needs jobs also), "AS LONG AS THE MONEY SAVED IS PUT BACK INTO THE ECONOMY". The problem is that these CEO's are pocketing the difference and the the jobs lost to outsourcing are not being replaced. The money the corps are saving should be made available as venture capital or used to fund new areas of business which would provide new employment opportunities to Americans. If my country does not take care of me when I need it how can it expect me to take care of it? I think we can be pretty sure we will see a civil war in this country within most of our lifetimes.

    29. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If you want to develop third-world countries, kill the agribusiness subsidies and let them start with farming (like everyone else did). Or let them start their own manufacturing industries, product industries, and so forth. Let them make things for us to BUY, we'll import them, and they'll get their hand up without simultaneously smacking anyone else down.

      There's a big difference between a country supplying some physical material and a country stealing another country's jobs. I'm all for you competing with me in the market over your products, but you try and take my job, and I'm going for your throat.


      Yep, this is like what's happened with Japan and S. Korea. They built themselves up into major manufacturing centers, and made products to sell to the rest of the world. Japan did it so well that they went from a feudal economy to one of the strongest first-world economies in less than a century.

      However, one big difference between then and now is that the corporations are much larger and more powerful, and communications technology makes outsourcing much easier than it used to be. Personally, I think there need to be much stricter limits on how large corporations can grow, and how much they can operate on a multi-national scale.

    30. Re:Free Market Capitalism by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Why is it ok to import sneakers and t-shirts from cheap Phillipine workers and importing "office jobs" is not?

      It has never been "ok" in any case. The exportation of jobs has been fought at every new turn. In every case, the American workers have lost for the benefit of corporate management. CEO compensation for large companies in the 50's averaged about six times the wage of the average worker. Now the average compensation for a CEO in a large company is over $9 million. For IT companies, compensation over $20 million is commonplace. We now have CEOs making a thousand times the average worker's salary for getting rid of the workers who are the company.

      During every new exportation of jobs, the corporate refrain has been, "You peons should retrain for better jobs." Well, now there are no "better" jobs to retrain for, and the peons know it.

    31. Re:Free Market Capitalism by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Or, they hire cooks, maids, drivers.

      Geez. I've been writing code and schematics for decades, and I don't have any of those things. I'm thinking someone has been severely shorting my paycheck.

    32. Re:Free Market Capitalism by lysium · · Score: 1
      That was one of the better-written defenses of globalization. But,

      Is it better to say "you can't have our jobs until your environment is clean" or is it better to say "here, have some jobs; now please take your new money and spend some of it on cleaning up your environment and implementing new laws"?

      does't work in my view. Just look at power plants in the United States. Even in the 'civilized' East, there are unfiltered coal plants belching smoke into the air (at night, so you can't see it). If we allow our government to grandfather and re-grandfather bad pollution into our future, do you really expect other third-world countries to act differently?

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    33. Re:Free Market Capitalism by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Yay. Capitalism

      Hey, I see your point but it really doesn't have much to do with capitalism, since it isn't practiced in the U.S. If it were, Carly would be selling on a street corner instead of chopping heads in a boardroom (not that I'd buy any). What we have is a government and corporate oligarchy controlled by monied interests and the best legislature that money can buy.

    34. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Genda · · Score: 1

      I'm getting really sick and tired of people saying that "Exporting American Jobs is something that we'll just have to get used to..."

      This only works as long as it's some other poor bastards job, and you have other jobs waiting. What happens when all the work an American can do, can be done somewhere else cheaper. Then, no company in this country need hire another single American to get there products made, sold, supported. Oh, there'll be jobs at warehouses, driving trucks, picking fruit (we'll finally have a good reason to keep the hispanic folk behind the border), but any job that pays better than poverty wages... forget it.

      Three years ago, I had a third tier tech support job paying $105,000 per year. I haven't seen more than a dozen tech support jobs available since then. Hundreds of thousands of people did support across the country. The vast majority of those jobs are gone. Billions of dollars of tax base. Haven't y'all noticed the financial pinch lately at the local and state tax levels? Oh,and if you think the Fed isn't about to come up with exciting revenue enhancers (and it won't matter if it's Bush or Kerry), y'all seem to missing the big picture.

      This entire economic process is not sustainable. It's broken. You can only empty the bank for so long and then it stops being a bank. The U.S. economy is being pillaged. It's working class is slowly being squeezed into a poverty class. The process of automation is amplifying the effect. The availability of cheap third party labor is amplifying the effect. Soon the engine behind global economic encentive (i.e. the U.S. economy), will be bankrupt, and then the entire global economy is going into the dumper. There may be a few small flickers as lesser engines spin up on the economic flow that emptied the U.S., but each in turn will be smaller and less meaningful as the global economy reaches equilibrium. As the wealth flows, a very few will get rediculously rich, and the vast majority of people will become desperately poor.

      We need to get over this fiction that we don't live in a closed system, with a bottom line cost of operation, and ultimately an accountability to the race of beings who make the whole damn thing possible. It won't even work when a dozen people own everything, and the rest of the world lives in abject poverty, because sooner or later the poor folk will notice and kill the rich bastards. We need to come up with a new model, a new economic system that serve human beings, that serves the interest of being human. Making people just another disposable commodity dooms us all to a future of despair and disaster that dwarfs anything we've seen in the past. Free trade does not limit individual or institutions from using their wealth and power to gain more wealth and power by any means at any cost. Human being are nasty enough, wicked enough, greedy enough, to gut their fellows, and sell the husks. We need to make ethical behavior an integral part of the business process. We need to make a world where the joy of life is being great, and the goal of life is being a contribution to the human condition. The game that we're currently playing has no happy resoltion.

      Genda

    35. Re:Free Market Capitalism by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention things like ketchup...

      It's spelled "Ke-tsiap", you insensetive clod!

    36. Re:Free Market Capitalism by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      I know it's hard for geeks like us to understand, but not everything is an either/or, one/zero proposition. Maybe we can have some socialism and some capitalism. It could work, and would probably be better than both situations.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  3. Capitalism by Orgazmus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, that is the way of the capitalism.
    The money goes to whoever takes the job for a lesser amount of money.

    --
    The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    1. Re:Capitalism by swordboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll tell you what:

      I work for a large corporation and we made a big deal out of the language barrier and complete ineptitude of some of the people on the other end of the phone. Now, we've renewed all of our support and paid extra for the premium level of service. HP/Compaq's call center is in Canada somewhere and IBM's call center actually announces itself on the phone menu:

      You're call is now being routed to our support center in Atlanta, Georgia.

      If enough consumers made a stink about it, tech support wouldn't be in India for them. Come to think of it, if one of the big PC vendors wanted to get a leg up on the competition, they could advertise "English speaking tech support" as the number one feature of their PCs. They'd be sold out in no time.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    2. Re:Capitalism by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is the Indian help centers were incapable of doing their job as well as native speakers. So it's not just who will do it for less, it's who can actually do the job.

    3. Re:Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, some money goes to the lower paid worker, while more money remains with the capitalist, further widening the gap between rich and poor.

    4. Re:Capitalism by qwijibo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The job of tech support is to get the customer off the phone in the shortest period of time. The ones providing tech support bill based on number of calls.

      How many call centers track the resolution of the issues and customer satisfaction? I would guess it's a very small percentage. Customer satisfaction is the antithesis of the purpose the tech support is there to provide. The reason that good customer service is so hard to find is that people who convince the customer all is lost and they should give up in 2 minutes are promoted. On the other hand, the person who can solve most problems, but has a 10 minute average call time will be reprimanded by management for not handling their share of calls.

      Customer service is an expense to the company providing it. When the company already has your money, what is the incentive to spend more of their money on providing better service? Very few companies care about providing good service. They just have to provide a level of service that's not noticeably worse than the competition.

    5. Re:Capitalism by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ones providing tech support bill based on number of calls.

      if the company that hires the callcenter chooses this kind of contract, then yes, that's what yóu're gonna get. You get what you pay for and stuff. I know for a fact that when I worked at an out-source callcenter that one of our customers who DID care about service levels paid by the minute, not by the call. They also had people checking the service levels on a daily basis, so things don't always work this way. In fact, working callcenter in a NUTS company right now, our level of service is pretty much the biggest difference there is between the various competitors on the market, so there's a very big emphasis on keeping the customer happy.
      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    6. Re:Capitalism by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      Northgate (a brand of computers sold at Staples) does advertise American tech support. And the ESP's that we sell (yes, I'm a red shirt) also come with American, english tech support. A lot of people say that it would be nice, but most people aren't willing to shell out the extra $$ for the ESP or make the quality of the tech support a major consideration when making a purchase.

    7. Re:Capitalism by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      If enough consumers made a stink about it, tech support wouldn't be in India for them.

      Why move your call center to India when there are so many Indians here that can populate your call center?

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    8. Re:Capitalism by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 1

      yes, I'm a red shirt

      You might want to start thinking of excuses in case Captain Kirk ever invites you to join a landing party...

    9. Re:Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a slight problem with what you say.

      A corporation in any part of America can hire the cheapeast employees anywhere in the world, but any employee in America has to pay American rent, buy American food, pay American taxes, buy American clothes.

      You can not simply say "if you can't work for cheaper, that's your problem", because the market is designed so that you HAVE to make a certain amount to survive based on your location and an American simply can not live on the same salary as, say, an Indian.

      People act like you're a selfish, wasteful, greedy American if you can't survive on $6,000/year. Well I'm sorry, but since I live in America, I can't pay Indian prices for rent, food and other goods. If I could, I'd be able to work for less.

    10. Re:Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Edmonton, Alberta Canada and there are several IT companies handling IT support as an alternative to shipping jobs over seas.

      Convergys handles HP/Compac and IBM farms out support all over. I was up for job with IBM to handle support for ING Direct employees for all of North America. Luckily I got a better job offer. Phone support sucks.

    11. Re:Capitalism by PuNKY^BReWSTeR · · Score: 1

      Actually, Minacs handles HP/Compaq's sales center which is in Canada and it's technical support, which was handled by Convergys in Canada has moved this year to India.

    12. Re:Capitalism by Dravik · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      All he Indian here are busy driveing cabs. Also, watch out for Iran, they have threatened to cut of the supply of 7-11 attendents.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    13. Re:Capitalism by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      What scares me is that we're the front lines at Xmas and back-to-school.

    14. Re:Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've called HPQ support many times. I always end up in India and have to repeat myself over and over again because they don't understand English! Like another poster said, "My name is Frank. That's F R A N K. F! Like in Frank!"

    15. Re:Capitalism by Tickets · · Score: 1

      Wrong the Company that rhymes with hell already offers a "Gold" support package which offers that evrey person you speak with has a Microsoft certification. Very few are willing to pay for it so the offer of all English does not work. I have a better idea. Hit it where it hurts in the pocket book. I have a problem with a Monitor, it is a little Fuzzy. Obvisouly the beam sync is going bad in the monitor. It is usable but it is on the way out. I decided to have a little fun and call the Manuf rhymes with hell. The very polite guy jumped me through the hoops and sent another monitor the very next day via Fed-x. Well He sent me a NEC monitor and not a Trinitron which is what I paid extra for when I bought the Computer. I called again and the second guy was very polite and so was I. He sent me another monitor. Sure enough it was another NEC. The next day I called again and the very polite guy sent me a third NEC monitor. My Back Yard looks like I am building a tower of bable with the very large Monitor boxes all lined up. I called Customer service this time and not Tech support and Explained I have Three of the Incorrect Moinitors sitting in my back yard plus the bad one that makes four monitors I have. He said they no longer have Trinitron Monitors and the NEC is the replacement. I said Wrong, NEC uses a totally different technology than Sony Trinitron they are not similar and you can not call them that. The differance is so glaring that even a Judge who knows nothing about technology can understand wires VS holes in the design. I told him that I would be willing to accept the highest quality 19 inch LCD they have brand new and not Referb. in exchange for the 4 monitors I now have possession of. He siad NO way that monitor is $695.00. your origional monitor only cost $150.00 extra. I said, Oh Well, you should have kept enough of them in stock unitll the end of the warrenty period. You did not, so you lose. I told him either that or I will take you to Small claims court and when the judge learns you shipped me three incorrect monitors over 4 day period what do you think he is going to do? I said here in America we have a saying that you may want to consider: When you find yourself in a hole over your head, The first thing you need to do is stop digging. He put me on hold for 20 min. He came back and said that in order to keep me as a good customer he would send me the 19 inch LCD monitor Fed-X. But I would have to send the other 3 back within 10 days or they would bill me for them. I said no problem they all have return lables included in the box. I said Thank You and hung up. I did not get upset and all the politeness in the world did not save them from making the mistake of not keeping a limited supply of the monitors. You can buy them on the Net for $68.00 refrb. but they sent me a $700 LCD instead. That is how you hurt them, play their game and be polite and easy to get along with them as they dig their own grave.

    16. Re:Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wrong the Company that rhymes with hell already offers a "Gold" support package which offers that evrey person you speak with has a Microsoft certification."

      Wait, you want me to pay extra so I can talk an MCSE? A "I didn't dribble into my keyboard enough to kill myseslf, so they gave me this shiny MCSE certificate" MCSE?

      Oh, and maybe you people just shouldn't buy (D|H)ells. I bought a 'prebuilt' computer from a local computer place. It was basically a case, PSU, cd-rom drive & motherboard w/ everything on-board. I bummed a used monitor and wireless keyboard & mouse off of some people and have had it for several years and not one thing has failed (and I've abused it much, much more than these dells were likely abused, too). The keyboard & mouse were already a few years old and the monitor was 7 IIRC when I received them. This was nothing expensive, either (my family of 3 lives off of less than $10000/year (Canadian), so trust me when I say not expensive).

      I also have a Toshiba Dynabook that I've had for quite a few years. Again, quite abused. All that is wrong with it is the "0" key was broken off, and the label is coming off of the right shift key.

      Am I just lucky or something?

  4. Your name please? by ejdmoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Frank"

    "OK, Frank, how do you spell that?"

    Gah!

    1. Re:Your name please? by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      Yeah, try having a name like Wolf. People insist on putting extra "o"s and "e"s in there, even when I introduce myself as "Wolf, as in creature that howls at the moon"... and that's without getting to my surname.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    2. Re:Your name please? by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mr. Blitzer, I didn't know such an esteemed journalist as yourself frequented slashdot! When will Cowboy Neal get his own talk show on CNN? I mean come one, if Judy Woodruff can get one, clearly you have time for the Commander Taco Cowboy Neal Power Hour! You don't even have to put it on prime time, most geeks are awake at 4 am.

    3. Re:Your name please? by magefile · · Score: 1

      Y'think that's bad? I have a computer from that manufacturer whose name sounds like "hell", and they have these things called Service Tags - basically a serial number - that consists, in my case at least, of 5 letters and 2 digits. One of the letters is "M", yet despite the fact that I always say it ("Ay Bee Cee Dee Em One Two"), then immediately follow up with the official international phonetic spelling ("Alpha Bravo Charlie Delta Mike One Two"), it gets heard by the techs as "N" as in "Nancy".

      I know the "N as in Nancy" is standard, because I hear it every time. But what is the point of using a phonetic alphabet where you have to hear the first syllable to figure out the word? (Nancy? Fancy?) The phonetic alphabet was created specifically to avoid those situations, so why don't they fucking use it?

    4. Re:Your name please? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Wolf? I'd kill for a name like that. My name is 10 characters long, and ends in a series of four consecutive consonants.

      I'd use phonetic alphabet, but when I try to use "Sierra" for "S", I get, "Huh?"

      So I just end it by saying...

      Esss [long pause] Sssseeee [long pause] Aitch [long pause] Ellllllluh

      They then read it back, correctly, but they must decide I was wrong, because any further correspondence regarding the matter is always misspelled.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    5. Re:Your name please? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      They ask me for a name and I say
      Brian
      Bravo
      Rodger
      India
      Alpha
      November

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    6. Re:Your name please? by houghi · · Score: 2, Funny

      They ask me for a name and I say
      Brian
      Bravo
      Rodger
      India
      Alpha
      November


      Hello mister November, how may I help you?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:Your name please? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Frank:

      Foxtrot
      Rodger
      Alpha
      November
      Kamasutra

      Tech: Kamasutra?

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    8. Re:Your name please? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      NO NO NO!
      November is...$##@$@$#$@ it!
      Can I speak to your supervisor... PLEASE?

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    9. Re:Your name please? by goldmeer · · Score: 2, Funny

      "F - as in Frank"
      "R - as in Frank"
      "A - as in Frank"
      "N - as in Frank"
      "K - as in Frank"

    10. Re:Your name please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be Bravo, *Romeo*, India, Alpha, November

    11. Re:Your name please? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      wow, your right. shame on me for not operating enough.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    12. Re:Your name please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Some day someone will spell "Bob" as "Baub"

  5. Phonetic alphabet by Skiron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Too true - when the hardware support at my firm (UK) moved to Sri Lanka, everybody was advised to use the phonetic alphabet when making helpdesk calls - it really it a mess with these of-shore support desks for communication.

    Spend like 10 minutes explaining who you are.

    1. Re:Phonetic alphabet by KontinMonet · · Score: 2, Funny

      But it's better fun using the 'un-phonetic' alphabet, which goes something like:

      C as in Church
      E as in Eye
      G as in George
      I as in Itch
      L as in Llanfairpwll..blah..gogogoch
      M as in Mnemonic
      P as in Psychologist
      T as in The
      X as in Ten

      ...you get the idea...

      --
      Did he inhale?
    2. Re:Phonetic alphabet by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      I like Jon Katz' Bit:

      "My Name is Barrington."

      "How do you spell that?"

      "Oh it's B as in Barrington, A as in arrington, r as in rrington..."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:Phonetic alphabet by CodeMunch · · Score: 1
      it really it a mess with these of-shore

      No wonder your off shore support was having problems with blurbs like that. I'm no typing master myself, but as an "on-shore" English Canadian, I had to read that 3 or 4 times. You're just setting them them up for failure with text like that ;)

    4. Re:Phonetic alphabet by KWTm · · Score: 1

      An email address like bunty_tifs@yahoo.com could be spelled out as:

      B as in Ball
      U as in Ululation
      N as in Night
      T as in Tail
      Y as in Ytterbium
      (underscore)
      T as in Tall
      I as in Intransigent
      F as in Flash
      S as in Sail
      (@yahoo.com)

      Of course, that might be interpreted as

      D as in Doll
      U as in Ululatin
      M as in Might
      P as in Pale
      Y as in Ytterbium
      (underscore)
      P as in Paul
      I as in Intransigent
      S as in Slash
      S as in Sail

      --
      404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
      [GPG key in journal]
    5. Re:Phonetic alphabet by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      S as in sea
      D as in double-u
      W as in wye

  6. Re:Why use tech support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm guessing that the kind of people who read USA Today really *really* need manuals and tech support.

    And illustrations.

    And GUIs.

    And they probably love Clippy, too.

    "Ooh! Look! My little paperclip friend is back! Brandy, come look! Say 'hi', Clippy!"

    "Oh, cuuuuuuute!"

  7. Re:Why use tech support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what do you do? Rent it until you learn?

  8. Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by rokzy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    >Barr called Dell seeking help formatting, partitioning and reloading Windows XP. "I got a tech in India who spoke British English. I am 73, speak Alabama English and use two hearing aids. We both experienced some understanding problems."

    >One communications snag: The rep didn't realize that when Barr said "oh" he meant the number, not the letter.

    wtf is Alabama English? you can't just make up your own languange and expect it to be supported. this is just arrogance. if you don't want to speak or type properly that's fine but you live with the consequences.

    it'd be like someone from London speaking cockney rhyming slang and expecting that to be understood.

    you should always speak in the most clear and correct way when making a non-personal phone call, including additional redundancy e.g. "A for apple".

    you can't be bothered doing this? tough.

    1. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a berk.

    2. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Skiron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am in Pompey, England. I regularly deal with people in Montreal CA and East Hartford USA - big problem - with my English accent and the speed I speak, they just can't understand me - no matter how I try to speak.

      The usual fix normally ends up as an E-Mail.

    3. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by damu · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is called colloquialism and every region, state has it. You can pick up some of it from tv (in exagerated form) but still you can get a taste for it. Just like in Texas where yall means you all.

      --


      Useless sig.
    4. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? This isn't insightful.

      This is the customer.

      If the customer wants to speak Alabama English, tough shit on Sony or Dell or whoever that doesn't want his very American Alabama English dollars if they won't get tech support people who understand him.

      It's all about the customer, stupid!

    5. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1, Insightful

      if you don't want to speak or type properly that's fine but you live with the consequences.

      Still being a complete dumbass, I see. It's called a "dialect". Look it up super-retardio brother.

      In fact, I hate to tell you, but unless you're speaking the original English language, which you're not, you are using a dialect. I suppose then, that any communication barriers you hit with other English-speakers are your fault, right?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    6. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by random_culchie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you are understating the differences in regional dialects and accents.
      I live in Ireland a reletivly small country and I have sometimes have difficulty understanding people from different regions!

    7. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have thought a southern accent would be that hard to understand (compared to say geordie or mancunian), or does Portsmouth have its own dialect?

    8. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by MBaldelli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you should always speak in the most clear and correct way when making a non-personal phone call, including additional redundancy e.g. "A for apple".

      Uhhh, On Monday, I tried my best to speak with as little slang, and as little of an accent as I could, and I still couldn't make myself clear to Ghumpta in New Delhi, because that's where Dell happened to have moved their support to. It too me having to make Ghumpta repeat himself six times in order to make heads and tails of what he was trying to tell me.

      It also took Herculean efforts on my part not to blow up on his sorry ass when he told me something that was clearly a lie.

      Comanpies are seeing a fall in profits and interests in their products? Good! Put localized support that can speak basically the same language, instead of looking for the cheapest way to piss off your customer base.

      --
      "The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
    9. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 4, Funny

      > it'd be like someone from London speaking cockney rhyming slang and expecting that to be understood

      Heh. Cockney rhyming tech support.

      "What? No, no, I don't *have* a Mac, I have a PC! What? NO! I have *one* broken *Windows* computer! Why do you keep talking about Apples in pairs? And no, I do *not* think this should be lemon squeezy! Give me your manager! No, dammit! Not the *governor!* GAAAAAH!" /sound of quiet sobbing in the background.

    10. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Skiron · · Score: 1

      Pompey is very similar to cockney - in fact, people often mistake a true pomponian accent for an East London one.

      Dain tain raind the raind-about with yer traisers dain.

    11. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There are two sides to the communication problems. While I agree that the tech support center should not be required to speak every dialect of the English language like a native speaker (that would be impossible), they should do as much as they can to understand the various dialects, whether it is Southern, Texan, New England, British, or Indian.

      It should be noted that such a problem is not inherent to tech support centers overseas. A representative from Vermont may have just as much trouble understanding a caller from South Carolina as the representative in India. Thus this issue does not do much to support the racist/ethnocentric view that no one in California should go unemployed while people in India have work.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    12. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people that speak UK English can probably make themselves understood to others than speak UK English. The same can be said about US English. On the other hand, if you get someone with a particularly harsh dialect of US English speaking to someone with a particularly harsh dialect of UK English (ie. someone from the back woods of the south and someone from the films Trainspotting or Snatch), it's quite possible that even when trying to be understood neither will have any idea what the other is saying, even without slang.

      Personally, I couldn't understand what 90% of the people I met were saying for the first 2 months after I moved to Virginia, and this is about as far north as you can go before you are completely out of the south (and to those that contest that Virginia is in the south: where was the capital of the Confederacy?).

      If a company doesn't provide tech support that can handle the calls it will receive, then they are very likely to lose business eventually.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    13. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That word "Ghumpta" makes me laugh every time I read it, no matter how often, nice one.

    14. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder why everybody on the planet just loves Americans...

    15. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      what's service levels coming to when companies can't even afford to hire staff that can lie convincingly...back in the day I used to convince people the moon was purple when told to do so, and if I felt like taking a little initiative I'd even sell a few square meters on it...

      Still, I applaud your not exploding in his face. Poor Ghumpta likely has to tell lies in order to keep his family fed. You have no idea how crappy it is to have a job like that.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    16. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by magefile · · Score: 1

      I agree, the GP is stupid, but it's not a friggin' dialect, it's a friggin accent, eh?

      And I just figured WTF "chit" and "unchit" mean - checked and unchecked. Woot!

    17. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I'm from Houston Texas and just got back from ten days in London. I knew going in that I'd probably have to make an effort to speak clearly but that can be tough to do when you don't hear your own accent because that's mostly the only thing you've ever heard.

      Additionally I had trouble making out what a number of people I met were saying at various times. None of us were "wrong". Just different.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    18. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0, Troll

      The reference to "Alabama English" (or whatever state it was) is indicative of a regional dialect. While they may also have a different accent that can impair the delivery and reception of messages between the two speakers, the dialect is the only thing that was actually referenced as a problem.

      There are many other differences that could impact the message such as colloquialisms, euphisms (which would also come into play based on cultural differences), slang, etc. However, the only problem noted (from the GP post, I didn't RTFA) indicates that the different dialects are what impaired the communication process.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    19. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by johnw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In fact, I hate to tell you, but unless you're speaking the original English language, which you're not, you are using a dialect.

      Define "original English language".

      American English differs quite a lot from English English but neither can claim to be the original. It's pretty clear that English has grown away from American English just as much as American English has grown away from English.

      Everyone speaks a dialect.

      John

    20. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with parts of your statement. Although people may find it more difficult to understand people with a different dialect, generally those staff in a call centre generally deal with lots of regional accents all the time. Although sometimes it may be difficult, this is far less likely to happen with someone who has English as their first language.

      Generally support staff take more time and care when listening to calls. Over time this improves, which is why a high turnover of staff is counterproductive. Moving a call centre overseas, effectively eliminates any advantages gained from the staff as a resource and will show these problems. Maybe in time, the staff will learn better English and less of these problems will occur. Personally I think staff should have the skills to do the job or be made redundant, whether Indian or otherwise.

      Having English as a first language better enables people to adjust to problems and 'error correct'.

      In response to your argument, your example does little to support the article you're replying to. Service has suffered and people were made redundant to outsource this work. Do you yourself think it is good for a company to unnecessarily outsource services to plainly incompetent support companies? I mean, whether the staff are in India, Mexico, China its not the issue. The issue is the company is not fulfilling their purpose.

    21. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny
      wtf is Alabama English?

      Lahf is lahk a box a choc'lates, you nevva know whut you gonna git.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    22. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0, Troll

      That was the point.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    23. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "Define "original English language"."

      As in England preceded the United States in historical time?

      Of course,probably nobody today in either country would understand English as it was spoken then either.

      Actually I wouldn't expect someone in California to understand "Alabama English" either. I've been in Alabama and I know what he means.

      OTOH, if someone in India can't understand someone from Massachusetts (even saying "Cuber" instead of "Cuba") or California, there's a problem on the Indian side. New York? Well, if you say "daawwg" instead of "dog", I would expect the problem is on the American side.

      The problem isn't who can understand what, it's the CEOs being too stupid to realize there will BE communication problems in addition to the technical ones, and trying to run a tech support operation in such an environment is just asking for trouble. But CEOs and bean counters don't concern themselves with facts, just dollars.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    24. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      wtf is Alabama English?

      Any native english speaker would easily understand a thick accent from alabama. This is very different from rhyming slang which is actually speaking in code. I recently worked with a jewish man from new york in his 60s. He had a thick accent and hearing aids. I could converse with him with little effort. The indians who were on our software development projects were a different story. Watching this man and an indian communicate was quite hilarious, and this was in person. I can only imagine what the phone conversation would be like.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    25. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "Just like in Texas where yall means you all."

      Ooooooohhh. I thought it was vocalised punctuation.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    26. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      "Although sometimes it may be difficult, this is far less likely to happen with someone who has English as their first language."

      Uh, someone living overseas does not mean they do not know English as a native language. In India, for example, English is one of the most popular languages spoken (not too long ago they were a British colony after all). That is one of the big reasons India has grown as a major source of usable labor (as opposed to China or Japan).

      " Over time this improves, which is why a high turnover of staff is counterproductive. "

      Being that tech support is generally considered an entry level job which one hopes to hold just long enough to launch the rest of their career, a turnover of staff is going to happen regardless of where the call center is located. If anything, the turnover would be greater in the States where the job market is really good (contrary to what John Kerry is saying on the campaign trail, our unemployment rate is one of the lowest in the world among large nations).

      "The issue is the company is not fulfilling their purpose."

      But said failure is not a result of offshoring, and any attempt to blame offshoring is usually just making excuses to justify bigotry.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    27. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by MBaldelli · · Score: 1

      You have no idea how crappy it is to have a job like that.

      Actually I have a pretty good idea, given the fact that I've been working on and off in the tech support field (level 1 and level 2) for close to 15 years. My last job was with people that only just joined the rest of us in the Information Age.

      what's service levels coming to when companies can't even afford to hire staff that can lie convincingly

      I usually applaud people that can lie convincingly to me. Particularly if they can get me off the phone believing what they told me is true only for me to find out that it wasn't entirely the case. I usually ask for those people by name if and when I call back, because chances are, they're more knowledgeable about the product than they appear.

      --
      "The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
    28. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Any native english speaker would easily understand a thick accent from alabama"

      I would respectfully suggest that with more than 250 million English-speaking natives and with English as its official language, India would qualify as a country of native-english speakers.

      Aside from that, I do in fact sympathise with the southern gentleman because, as a customer he has the right to expect a solution to his problems with a low level of accompanying aggravation.

    29. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by CodeMunch · · Score: 1
      > >One communications snag: The rep didn't realize that when Barr said "oh" he meant the number, not the letter.

      >wtf is Alabama English? you can't just make up your own languange and expect it to be supported. this is just arrogance. if you don't want to speak or type properly that's fine but you live with the consequences.

      Any geek worth their paycheque has dealt with and can recognize potential '0' and 'O' discrepancies.

      Alabamans don't realize they talk with accents. No American realizes they have an accent (yeah, I'm Canadian & no, I don't have an accent ;)

    30. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      You're right in the last paragraph, CEO's are not generally that stupid and do realize there will be communication problems. They just don't think these are important enough to stand in the way of cost cutting.

    31. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

      Right. In my experience there is going to be a language barrier between a guy in Alabama and anywhere else on the planet. I hope I'm not offending any Alabamians, so in the unlikey circumstance that you live in Alabama, your town has electricity, and you can read, I apologize in advance for any offense I may have caused.

    32. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by rizole · · Score: 1

      "Right mate...'ave you tried a whistle un flute on the old arm un knee? You ave? You gotta be 'avin' a laaff incha?
      Try this then, give "my computer" the old micheal knight lickety split and go darn ta properties. Click on the well-'ardware 'ansome cab and then on ta the device pitch un toss.
      what do you mean there's naffin there. Bleedin norah mate, this is turning aart ta be a right lionel blair. fak........."

    33. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know! It's because we're so squeezably soft around the middle, right?

    34. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by budgenator · · Score: 1

      You should try youpper's, people from the upper peninsula of Michigan, an odd cross of French-Canadian english and Flemish. Renting "Moonlight on the Escanaba" will give you a taste of the Youpper colloquialism and culture.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    35. Re:Sorry but I have no sympathy for this guy by graveyhead · · Score: 1
      Cockney rhyming tech support
      Ha! Was anyone else reminded of Holly from Red Dwarf?

      Lister: Can't you check the black-box recording?
      Holly: Yeah, hang on [dissapears from screen]
      Holly: [reappears] Oi! It's been half-inched!
      --
      std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
  9. Maybe this will provide the motivation by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to put some money into automation, which is probably where most tech support is going to be in 10 years anyway. Outsourcing "hid" the costs for a while, but as the service levels fall(the service was probably initially good because only the best were doing it, once everyone else jumped on the bandwagon, then it started to fall) and costs increase, companies are going to look to new ways to save money, and it probably won't be by hiring Americans.

  10. MSFT is very guilty of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Their techs are skilled, but I often call again, just so I can get a native english speaker. I don't mind working with heavily accented people, but when you have critical issues which can affect thousands of users, that small barrier becomes more than a nusance, it becomes dangerous.. /coward

    1. Re:MSFT is very guilty of this by minerat · · Score: 1

      Really? Are you calling professional PSS? I usually open a case or two each year and they're always the brightest, most articulate people. And they're usually based in the US. None of my half dozen PSS calls have gone to someone who wasn't in the US.

      --
      ...and you've eaten your pen. simply stunning.
    2. Re:MSFT is very guilty of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure? I know quite a lot of people who work for Microsoft PSS, handling USian calls, and they're mostly in Canada..

  11. I just quit my job in tech support last week by FrivolousPig · · Score: 0, Funny

    I just went insane after having to tell people things like how to turn on their computer, how to turn it off, and being asked "Is that a capital number 1?" As far as I'm concerned the Indians can have my job and the retards that go with it.

    --
    ~ All comments automatically moderated -1 since 2004 ~
  12. I don't use tech support often, but by robslimo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the average person in the workforce is being required more and more to use computers (and similar technologies) in their work (students also). An earlier (down-modded as troll and rightly so) post said "don't buy software if you don't know how to use it." On the off chance that the poster was serious, please consider those who have little or no choice.

    Back to me... I said I don't use tech support much, but my few experiences are mixed. On Aug 9, I wanted to know the exact date that I could expect XP SP2 to hit my lab PCs via AutoUpdates, so I called MS tech support. I talked to a lady who said (in a confident manner), "today!" Well, she was off by a couple of weeks. As usual with support issues, I found better information on the web.

    1. Re:I don't use tech support often, but by d_jedi · · Score: 1

      In that case, I think it depends on how you phrased the question.. SP2 has been available as an auto update for a while now.. if you upgraded to the new version of Windows Update, I believe..

      --
      I am the maverick of Slashdot
    2. Re:I don't use tech support often, but by robslimo · · Score: 1

      MS's first official release (via WU and AU) was Aug 16, but they delayed it to the 25th.

      As classes started on the 23rd, we decided to switch off autoupdates until we could test our apps with SP2. We did that in record time and have now re-imaged our systems with SP2, AU on.

    3. Re:I don't use tech support often, but by G00F · · Score: 1

      MS tech support is contracted out to convergis, who are just as out of the loop w/ MS and the like as the average consumer. Sometimes they are told an update will hit the auto update, only because they expect a higher than avg call volume that day. But the techs are not told anything.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  13. Eh, it's a trade off. by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You take a relatively minimaly skilled job like Tech support, ship it over seas to even cheaper labor and you get your ass bitten.

    Eh, I worked in tech support. The English native speakers are equally as worthless as those that are ESL overseas workers. It's basically a trade off for the most part.

    From my personal experience the ESL workers have more technical experience and end up being able to do something for you even if it takes longer for you to get your point across. The native English speakers suck at understanding your point AND they suck at the technical side of things.

    $9.00/hr jobs with shitty benefits (if any at all) to put up w/raving assholes bitching at you because your Internet connection is down isn't worth it for most people that have a clue (unless they are college students that need a flexible schedule).

    1. Re:Eh, it's a trade off. by maskedbishounen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Disclaimer: Unrelated ramble about (English) Tech Support

      A few months ago I changed DSL providers. I went through the trouble of getting a new modem, as the other was ISP-branded and lacked in some of the required features.

      I was supposed to be sent instructions about the new modem, but never was. I download the manual (having to download things related to setting up your internet connection... funny how that works) and go through the steps.

      Blink, blink, bliiink~ sync fails.

      I try a few alterations to the settings, all of which fail, and call up tech support. Maybe the line isn't active yet? Well, they tell me it is, and walk me through setting up the modem.

      The fun part is how I was told to do it. First, set your box to your external IP. Next, try to access the modem's internal IP..

      It was then that I gave up the idea of getting anything useful out of them. The modem only allows connections from IPs on it's own subnet, by default.

      As it turns out, though, for this particular modem, you have to reset it for certain changes to take effect. Most setting don't need the reset, but it turns out this one did. To make it better, I only found this out from the an obscure PDF the next day. Tech never mentioned it at all. Ah well...

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
    2. Re:Eh, it's a trade off. by dubstar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've worked in tech support too, and I have very rarely met anyone as incompetent as the people who currently do Dell's tech support. Regardless of the native language the tech speaks, they all seem to be morons.

      We had one Dell tech onsite who damn near took out our entire production database when performing an emergency upgrade because he 'forgot' where he unplugged some cables from.

      Of course that seemed minor after the fact.. We found out the Dell rep we were dealing with had sent the onsite tech out to install incompatible parts in our Dell server.. Because of this the entire process had to be repeated - during business hours.

      We've had plenty of dealings with their offshored phone support too. If you have to call them you had better plan to put a day aside before hand, because it will take you that long to 1) get through and 2) get your point across. After that you get to wait for 3 months for them to never e-mail you back or contact you with a solution. Do not EVER let them off the phone without solving your problem first.

      My favorite call to date was when they told us the Dell laptop we purchased with Windows XP, complete with the little 'Built for Windows XP' sticker affixed to it, was 'not compatible with Windows XP'.

      I'm sure there are other companies out there with horrible technical support too.. Dell tops my list, though. Watchguard and ATI are tied for second.. Watchguard not so much for their technical support (those guys seem dedicated to helping) as their shitty ass products.

    3. Re:Eh, it's a trade off. by m.h.2 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, however, if the TS worker has such a thick accent that you can't understand him, not only are you wasting your time, you're wasting more of it. It's frustrating enough having to deal with a dumbass who knows less about resolving problems than you, but when you can't understand each other, it's like being in the 8th circle of Hell.

    4. Re:Eh, it's a trade off. by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Had a power supply go out in a DELL server. Lucky: it was hot swap and redundant. Not so lucky: the flames came out and the supply popped the breakers on the UPS. So I called DELL to exercise our Gold support.

      Stated clearly that the PS catches on fire if plugged in, and wipes out the entire cabinet when the UPS pops. Stated that they were to replace it plugging the faulty supply in. (2 hour drive for me, let DELL do it. Bad idea.)

      With these instructions in hand, anybody want to guess what the first thing the DELL monkey did when he arrived?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Eh, it's a trade off. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      It's frustrating enough having to deal with a dumbass who knows less about resolving problems than you, but when you can't understand each other, it's like being in the 8th circle of Hell.

      What's worse is calling tech support, and "Roy Bob" answers saying, "Hi Y'all, how am I being of service?" with an unidentifiable but possibly Texan accent. It can only go downhill from there.

  14. and it's not just the language barrier by katdesign · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a cultural one too. Depending on the problem, users will expect empathy from the other side. With cultural differences, that gets harder. As a European, I've had to call a few US helpdesks in the past, and it's just not the same. You'd expect it to be ok, but i guess Americans just have a different method of social interaction than us Europeans.

    1. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When visiting Europe I was shocked at the low level of customer service provided in restaurants and other places where I expect and get excellent service here without question.

      Europeans seemed to treat customers as an annoyance to be tolerated.

      And this was with a native speaker at the table hosting us, btw, so don't start up with the "you must be obnoxious Americans".

      Try, "there's broken glass in my food, please take this back and bring one without broken glass in it" and getting flak from the waiter and his manager as well.

    2. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by pjay_dml · · Score: 1

      Hey Mister Sensitive!
      The author states in no mann "you must be obnoxious Amerixans".

      Feeling a little guilty?

      Only because you are judgemental, doesn't mean others are. Read, do not just guess!

    3. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Think yourself lucky you even got the food.

      Some of us Europeans have to live on Spam.

    4. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Exactly. Americans just want Americans on the end of their support lines. You also have to remember that the American slice of the pie is getting rapidly smaller and smaller.

      I have no problem with people with heavy accents on the end of the phone. I'm not a racist, so it doesn't peeve me that way, and I have working ears and a brain so I can usually figure out what someone's saying. (Note in point: I called Intel the other week, and they asked what chassis I had for my PC. The lady pronounced the ch as ch instead of sh, so that confused me for 10 seconds tops.

      I know this doesn't apply to everyone with bad tech support experiences, but lots of people here are bitter and resent those people for taking "american" jobs (what the hell an "american" job is, I don't know - there are no laws in the US that forbid foreign nationals from working at tech support). I know it's not everyone, but there are a few on here with alterior reasons for their lack of tolerance.

      Another point is that US-based tech support is rarely any better. I've spoken to tech support all over the world, and it's pretty much identical. India, Netherlands, UK, US, Uzbekistan, wherever - it's all the same deal. The one critical factor, though, is the better paid the tech guys, the better the service. You can bet that the Indian guys get a better wage than the American ones, so I really don't mind the jobs going wherever.

    5. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by magefile · · Score: 1

      Clarification: they don't get a better wage, per se. It may even be lower. But it is higher as far as purchasing power and standard of living are concerned.

    6. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification ;)

    7. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... meaning that you either agree with whatever they propose or end up having your country cruise-missiled.

    8. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure is a cultural barrier. indians are a@#%*s.

    9. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by kaos.geo · · Score: 1

      I work as tech support for an american firm, in the Argentina branch. I am Argentinian and speak decent( I'd like to think) english. IMHO the cultural barrier that so many of you refer to IS there but if the Tech Support guy is good, it ends up being irrelevant. On the other hand if the guy sucks, the nationality issue becomes instantly irrelevant ;).

    10. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by kimanaw · · Score: 1
      There actually are offshore locations that are both cheap and "Americanized". E.g., the Phillipines.

      I recently made a tech support call to order some software for which I had the SKU code, name, everything. I got someone in India, and spent 20+ minutes trying to understand him.

      A couple weeks later, I made another tech support call to get a replacement part for my laptop. I can't be certain, but I'm betting it was a Phillipine call center. The whole process was done in just a few minutes, and was one of the best tech support experiences I've had.

      If I'm ever successful enough to need an offshore call center, I'd check the Phillipines first. Americanized culture, trilingual (English, Spanish, and Tagalog!), and actually cheaper than the Indian alternative.

      (FWIW: I'm not Phillipino, and have no personal interest in any offshoring operation. I'm not thrilled about losing jobs here in the US, but, as someone who needs occasional tech support, I'd prefer it take as little time as possible and actually be helpful.)

      --
      007: "Who are you?"
      Pussy: "My name is Pussy Galore."
      007: "I must be dreaming..."
    11. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by dave420 · · Score: 1
      So you actually spent 20 minutes on the phone to someone asking them to repeat themselves? I find that a bit hard to believe ;)

      India has a very large percentage of English-speaking people, some of who can speak English better than most native English/Canadian/American/Australian people. Saying Indians can't speak English properly (which is what you're essentially saying, whether you meant it or not) is a bit harsh. Heck - I've spokent to tech support people in the US before who couldn't speak English properly. Everywhere's the same. Some are good tech guys, some are crap. They're probably in adjacent cubicles. It's that intrinsic in the sector.

    12. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Note in point: I called Intel the other week, and they asked what chassis I had for my PC. The lady pronounced the ch as ch instead of sh, so that confused me for 10 seconds tops.

      You're both right. Dictionary.com: chassis [sh (short a) s (long e), ch (short a) s (long e)]. Offhand, where did you grow up? I've always heard it as "ch" here in New Jersey.

    13. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to Europe yet, but I frequently find myself wishing American restaurants were a little more like European ones, because of what friends who've lived there have told me.

      Nothing is more annoying than going to a fine-dining restaurant, and the waiter coming over every 10 minutes, and interrupting your conversation just to ask if everything's ok. If I need something, I'll ask for it, but otherwise don't disturb me.

      What I've been told about European restaurants is that they watch you, to see when you need a drink refilled or something, or if you're trying to get their attention, but otherwise they leave you alone. This is how it should be.

    14. Re:and it's not just the language barrier by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 1

      It's not that their english is poor it's the extremely thick accent and the faster rate of verbal communication.

      Indian call centers should be training their staff to slow the hell down when they speak and to work on their accents. It sure is english but it's the Indian accent or British accent plus the speed.

      Now the Philippines is different. Their accent is almost Spanish when speaking English. Of course being occupied by the Spanish for 300 years affected that. They speak english because America won the Philippines after the Spanish American war. Recently, in terms of history, the Philippines is now independent. But America is responsible for building their schools and educating the common Filipino (this actually pissed off the elite Filipino's to no end...).

      Latest figures place their Deficit to about 80% of their gross domestic product. You think the US deficit is bad? Ours is only 4% of the gross domestic product. The economy in the Philippines is about to collapse in about 3 years.

      They could use the work afforded by US offshoring. Of course the reason their deficit is so bad is because of severe corruption problems in all levels of business and government. When Marco's was involved it was millions upon millions of peso's embezelled. The fact that the president was at the top and corrupt only proves that the corruption flows all the way to the bottom!

  15. Ugly Americans by ForestStryfe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "The only way to break through is to throw a tantrum and become an 'ugly American."

    I couldn't agree more. I had problems with Earthlink a few months ago after a bad storm had gone through - our DSL was down for most of the day, but I couldn't get a tech to give me a straight answer to my simple question. Eventually, I argued my way to a manager, who still refused to give me a straight answer. By the time I was done, they had lost their "american" accents and were more angry with me than I was with them. We tried calling customer service to get a complaint filed, only to find that the techs I had spoken with never logged any of the calls like they were supposed to, so it was impossible to even attempt to get a free month out of them.

    I find that a lot of problems stem from the fact that they refuse to deviate from the scripts that they're given - and won't believe you (with good reason - I know I don't usually believe the useres that I work with) that you've tried all of that already.

    1. Re:Ugly Americans by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      I'm really glad I leapt off that sinking ship (Earthlink) shortly after the "merger" happened.

      - Disgruntled former MindSpring employee

    2. Re:Ugly Americans by Kurayamino-X · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hmm....

      "our DSL was down for most of the day... ...so it was impossible to even attempt to get a free month out of them."

      so your entitled to a free month why? your DSL died because of a goddamn storm, theres not much tech support can really freaking do. do you call up and bitch at the power companies and demand free electricity when a storm nocks down powerlines and plunges you into darkness for a few minutes to a few hours?

      --
      ...I got nothing.
    3. Re:Ugly Americans by ForestStryfe · · Score: 1

      Our new Verizon service starts on September 1 - a lot cheaper than Earthlink and they haven't outsourced.

      Not to mention the fact that I don't have to pretend that I don't have a router. (Which they wanted to charge $12/month extra for!)

    4. Re:Ugly Americans by ForestStryfe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was more upset at the way that I had been treated - and this wasn't the first time that this had happened. I wanted a simple straight answer and had to dance on my head in order to even attempt it. The fact of the matter was that I had called three times in one day, had spoken to a couple of techs, and not one word of my conversations had been recorded.

      When their tech support was still in the U.S., we had gotten compensation a couple of times before for the problems stemming from them. I'm sorry, but if there's no communication between the workers here and there, then there's a significant problem that needs to be addressed. Unless it's been down for two days or more, the techs over there aren't even aware of it.

    5. Re:Ugly Americans by Laebshade · · Score: 5, Informative
      We tried calling customer service to get a complaint filed, only to find that the techs I had spoken with never logged any of the calls
      And this is why, my friends, that you always get the name, extension, and possibly company ID # to whomever you talk to.
    6. Re:Ugly Americans by nolife · · Score: 1

      I think the point was the person could not get a straight answer from the support group. I have numerous issues with this exact thing. Nothing is more frustrating then a tech support telling you "they are working on the problem" when you know they have NO IDEA what is really going on. I've had them tell me that before even asking who I was and where I lived. I called Comcast and Verizon every month for 3 years straight trying to get a date when broadband would be in my area. Every freaking month for years I heard "Soon" or "Next Month". Finally Comcast came in but now even 3 years after that Verizon is still not in the area. Six years ago they started telling me next month and soon and it is still not here. To this day, I still get promotions in the mail that claim it is available but it is actually not. It is not some strange local issue of why it is not at my house, it is not available anywhere within miles from where I live. Why does Verizon even have a support desk? The person could have told me, "I really have no idea."

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    7. Re:Ugly Americans by Kombat · · Score: 1

      do you call up and bitch at the power companies and demand free electricity when a storm nocks down powerlines and plunges you into darkness for a few minutes to a few hours?

      No, of course not, because power is a metered service. We only pay for what we use.

      Internet, on the other hand, is an "always-on" service. We pay $35 for a month of service. If we only get 29 days of service, then our monthly fee for that month should be reduced by an amount to reflect the day the service was unavailable. Why should we pay for service we didn't receive?

      Internet, cable, and telephone are services for which we pay a flat fee, per month. So when the service is reduced for some reason, then the fee should be reduced correspondingly.

      Electricity, natural gas, and the water bill are all "metered" services, where we only pay for what we use. If the service happens to be out for a day, our bill will be smaller, because we weren't using that service at all that day. Of course, it wasn't by choice, but the fact remains that we are not being asked to pay for service we didn't receive, as is the case with the DSL that was knocked out by a storm.

      He is probably not entitled to a free month, but he should certainly be credited for the days he was paying for service that was not available.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    8. Re:Ugly Americans by superflippy · · Score: 1

      My sis told me about a coworker of hers who discovered how to get connected to a real person as quickly as possible when calling her ISP. Instead of going through menu after nested menu, she just shouts obscenities loudly into the phone, and she's quickly connected to a service rep.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    9. Re:Ugly Americans by yaar · · Score: 1

      Because companies can't afford to employ staff sufficient to handle the highest call volumes, when taxed with heavy loads many call centers will overflow into other call centers. An overflow operator is lucky to have a script let alone access to your customer file.

      --
      "Nothing in education is so astonishing as the amount of ignorance it accumulates in the form of inert facts." - Henry A
    10. Re:Ugly Americans by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I find that a lot of problems stem from the fact that they refuse to deviate from the scripts that they're given


      I work for a US based call center.

      Typically when we're told, "I'm a network administrator! I know what the hell media state: disconnected means! It means something's wrong on YOUR end!" the answer is "Is the PC/Link light on the modem?" followed by, "...no."

      It's not that we're not willing to deviate from our pre-determined method of troubleshooting, it's that there are alot of asswads out there who work a sense of apathy towards customer "troubleshooting." Which is typically kicking the modem and wondering why it's not working.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    11. Re:Ugly Americans by ForestStryfe · · Score: 1

      I can understand this - my problem is that I call with one specific question that they refuse to answer until I've gone through troubleshooting. If they answer the question, I'll fix it myself. When I ask, "Is Genuity down?" I should get a simple yes or no answer.

    12. Re:Ugly Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Right. Trust me, if you've thrown a tantrum at me on the phone, you're not getting anything least of all a real name, extension or "company ID." People who throw tantrums will quickly find themselves up against a wall known as "support boundaries" and the "terms of service."

      I'm sure that's bad business for companies, but support jockies have no allegience (and don't even work for) the companies. What we care about is not being abused by pretentious sods throwing temper tantrums and demanding special treatment.

    13. Re:Ugly Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. But, you must realize that support agents are not allowed to do that.

      By my emphatically italicized not allowed, I mean: in most centres, calls are randomly subject to "quality assurance" evaluation in which the call recorded, reviewed, and scored according to a predetermined client metric. These metrics are usually contractually constrained, and in aggregate ultimately impact impact the centre's ability to meet service level to the client. Poor service levels mean less revenue (sometimes contractually obligated fines!) and ultimate layoffs or centre closings due to loss of the contract.

      These metrics are fully arbitrary, but, often require that key phrases, procedures, and so on, are uttered verbatim and in predetermined ways by front line staff. Deviating on these evaluations means, for the agents personally, lower rates of pay (usually in the form of reduced or denied "incentive" payments and fewer "merit" increases, eg. raises) as well as disciplinary action (up to, and often including, termination).

      So, for instance, if the contract says we can't mention Genuity by name, and, someone answers "yes" or "no" to your question, they may be summarily fired. Your problem is not worth the risk.

      Additionally, every single call is measured against KPI (key performance indicators). These almost always include restrictions on handle time and time spent off the phone researching customer issues or completing customer tickets. For instance, in one centre I've worked in, the average handle time metric for each agent is less than 14 minutes.

      Failure to meet KPI has the same impact as failure to evaluate well on QA reviews.

      Since most tech shops are not unionized, the front line workers have no collective impact on and are offered little, if any, opportunity to provide feedback on the contract. As a result, even if we want to help you (or want to negotiate a contract that, for instance, permits us to deviate from scripting or handle time requirements), we can't.

      The reluctance you sense is because doing what you ask means our jobs. It's that simple.

    14. Re:Ugly Americans by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      That's why you ask before you throw a tantrum. The moment you call, you ask for these things.

    15. Re:Ugly Americans by raile · · Score: 1

      My (and probably a lot of others') employee ID is unfortunately my social security number. Like hell I'm giving you that.

    16. Re:Ugly Americans by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      That's why I said possibly. As for where I work, I don't have a company ID or I don't know it, either way I can't give it out.

    17. Re:Ugly Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a friend call for help on a video game published by the company I worked for at the time. She couldn't get any help from them, and they refused(!!) to give her their direct numbers, insisting that she call the toll-free number instead.

      Suspicious, I looked up her call "ticket" internally - sure enough, the people she was talking to were in India and were apparently supposed to be hiding that fact.

      I left it at that (I'm not one to betray those who pay to support my family!) and did my best to help her myself.

    18. Re:Ugly Americans by type_J · · Score: 1

      when you say "they refuse to deviate from the scripts", I hope you mean management when you say "they."

      Chances are, techs deviating from the script get points knocked off their monitoring scores, affecting their raises, etc. And oftentimes that sort of thing is dictated by the call center's client, in this case Earthlink. You can't really blame the techs themselves for that. You may well be talking to savvy people, they're just not allowed to know what they're talking about.

    19. Re:Ugly Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "My name is Hugh Jass, extension 69, company ID 90210. How may I help you?"

      Got any more tips?

    20. Re:Ugly Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably because most menuing systems (in the UK atleast) put you through to someone if you fail to hit any buttons within a few times of running the menu options

    21. Re:Ugly Americans by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      "and won't believe you (with good reason - I know I don't usually believe the useres that I work with) that you've tried all of that already."

      Well simple, because I work tech support here in Canada for a major ISP in the US of A, and the reason why I wouldn't believe you (despite what you say) is because I've been burnt on the phone once too many times from people who insisted that they took the basic troubleshooting steps when in fact, after spending 20 minutes on a 3 minute call, didn't. So just because you are elite and have to stoop down to the level of calling tech support, keep in mind that were working with people most of the day who don't have a clue, so if our questions seem scripted and redundant - they are for a reason.

    22. Re:Ugly Americans by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      And this is why, my friends, that you always get the name, extension, and possibly company ID # to whomever you talk to.

      Yet another reason why if I got you on the phone, why I wouldn't give you anything but my first name. Nice try, but legally, we have no obligation to give you any information other than our first name, my ID number could be your ZIP code backwards, who knows what I might come up with next!

    23. Re:Ugly Americans by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      You should have nothing to hide if you're doing your job. That includes not cursing or yelling at the customer. It is fine to disagree, and fine to refuse something that your job does not require you to do, I do this all the time. Why are people so afraid to stand up for themselves?

    24. Re:Ugly Americans by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      I have no issue with someone requesting my information, if it is a valid reason and will help resolve the issue, but I have yet to speak to an irate person who is demanding my personal information for a valid reason, other than to complain that their issue is not supported because "it worked yesterday" and blah blah blah (unfortunately the people calling in don't know the support guidelines and I regularly point people to our support website to make sure they see what I do and do not support so as to confirm I am not making it up). These are the types of people I regularly give misinformation for, due to the fact that if they had a clue in the first place, they wouldn't be calling tech support for their issue in the first place. Most people reading these posts know better anyways...

    25. Re:Ugly Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can try to get the name, id number, and extension of everyone you talk to, but it's not going to amount to a hill of beans when dealing with a major oem, or for that matter anyone. If you are dealing with a bueacracy of over 40k people, guess what, the only people who want to talk to you are sales, and only to get more money out of you. With a large organization, no one gives a shit about anything but getting you off the phone. We really don't care, just stop bitching, if you knew what you were doing you would have built your system yourself.

    26. Re:Ugly Americans by adubeau · · Score: 1

      What was that simple question?

      'When will service be restored?'

      Do you really think the rep in the call center really knows how long the repairs will take?

      When I ask I usually get the same answer..

      'We are trying restore service as soon as possible'

      Would you have been happy with this answer?

      Most people wouldn't -- What good is for you to know that maybe a piece of equipment has failed or that lines were knoked out? Your not fixing the problem and complaining is not going to get it done any quicker...

      As for a credit, your entiltled for the time when service has unavailable. However,if you read your service contract you may find that they are not responsible for serive issues caused by Natural events, War or now days terrorist attack......

    27. Re:Ugly Americans by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      I suppose you and I are different in that respect. If a customer requests my name and extension, I always give it to them.

  16. wtf is alabama english? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alabama English is the closest thing to the tounge of Shakespeare on the planet, thou saucy knave.

    And what's the gratuitous Mac plug? This is not and OS/X thread. A is for Apple. Sheesh.

  17. Language is a stupid way to communicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's really two issues here, that are both somewhat addressed in the article:

    1) Americans speak their own brand of English that's incomprehensible to most of the rest of the world, and vice versa. That goes double for anybody with a regional accent. If I can't understand Mississippian, what chance does somebody from India have?

    2) There's a definite technical language gap, irrespective of dialect. Trying to figure out what's actually wrong is usually 90% of handling a call. Your typical electronics consumer only knows that this doohickey isn't doing what he wants it to do.

    The dialect-related problems can be solved by having regional call centers, but the technical language gap is a bigger and longer-term problem. As the article says, "We're not going to give you a crash-course in Excel over the phone"... but if the consumer won't give it to himself, he's going to blame the product, the vendor, or the support staff when it doesn't do what he thinks it should.

    1. Re:Language is a stupid way to communicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > 1) Americans speak their own brand of English that's
      > incomprehensible to most of the rest of the world, and vice
      > versa.

      ...which is why *nobody* buys their movies, music, television shows, software, hardware, consumer products, and services. There is a *language* barrier.

      I understand now! So, it's okay to disrespect the way Americans talk now.

      You can go back to stuffing your face with Doritos, listening to Britney Spears, and progamming Java, you fat pig.

    2. Re:Language is a stupid way to communicate by magefile · · Score: 1

      Not true. First, British English and Aussie English (accents and "dialectal differences") are much easier for the majority of Americans to understand than Indian English, simply because we hear more British English.

      Second, there are two major "standardized" pronunciations in the world: British Recieved Pronunciation, which is very clear, and Midwestern (which I am so lucky as to speak - it's what most news anchors use). There's also Mid-Atlantic, which, as the name suggests, is somewhere in between. Wikipedia has a reference.

    3. Re:Language is a stupid way to communicate by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, all languages aquire differences as distance is increased between population centers. Yes, those from down south speak differently than those from NY (Personally, I have no problem understanding anybody out west, the midwest, or down south, but trying to get an understandable conversation from somebody in say NY, or worse Boston, is a bitch). But if you look at most other regions, you will find that it is not dialects, but languages that differ. That is a given. In fact, it is amazing that USA speaks as much english as we do given that we have so many influences from outside.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Language is a stupid way to communicate by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      1) Americans speak their own brand of English that's incomprehensible to most of the rest of the world

      As and American, or USian, let me just say:

      Fo' shizzle!

      (could not resist)

      (For the rest of the world:
      this is slang of slang; it means "For sure", or "I agree/That's it/You got that correct".
      Not sure of the roots, beyond what would be 'Ebonics')

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  18. Give it time by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    Over time call centres will mature and provide good consistent service independent of location.

    By then, voice recognition and text-to-speech technologies and applications will have advanced sufficiently to enable the next generation of call centre, which will employ zero people.

    1. Re:Give it time by geekpuppySEA · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as soon as Microsoft's Natural Language Group and Google jointly create that Star Trek computer that understands English even when you're yodeling to your dog... then we'll get that auto techsupport that's as good as well-trained humans. Oh wait, that was supposed to have happened in 1997...

      (*obligatory HAL reference:) Sorry, luser, I can't open the port you requested...

      --
      Intelligent Design: because MATH is HARD.
  19. Watching "The Simpsons" finally pays off. by Chatmag · · Score: 3, Funny

    After listening to Apu on "The Simpsons" all these years, I don't have any problem understanding tech support.

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    1. Re:Watching "The Simpsons" finally pays off. by Chatmag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Insightful? Thanks whoever did that, but it was supposed to be "Funny". :)

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    2. Re:Watching "The Simpsons" finally pays off. by cuzality · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Thanks whoever did that, but it was supposed to be "Funny". :)

      'Insightful' nets Karma. 'Funny' does not.

      This post is neither. It is informative.

      .....
      My friend worked really hard on this Wikipedia entry: Standoff in Najaf

    3. Re:Watching "The Simpsons" finally pays off. by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      I just thought of something. "Karma" is Indian. n. Hinduism & Buddhism. The total effect of a person's actions and conduct during the successive phases of the person's existence, regarded as determining the person's destiny. Sanskrit, deed, action that has consequences, karma.

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  20. May I Suggest by kevin_conaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this article for those folks who think that people are "stealing" or "taking" jobs away from Americans?

    1. Re:May I Suggest by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      " this article for those folks who think that people are "stealing" or "taking" jobs away from Americans?"

      We're going through the same kind of 'immigration fear' in the UK, and it's one of the things that I point out; however, it's important to note that there is a flipside.

      If people are willing to work for less, what does that do to the job market in general? In terms of outsourcing, there is an asymetric shift of income _out_ of the market intended to be supported, and this will impact on the reduction in size of the market.

      For example; call centers used to be a sink for students and people who wanted short term employment. If you outsource all those jobs, then you're shifting them. While they may not count in terms of them being short contract or 'temp' jobs, the overall number of jobs available shrinks, meaning less money actually stays in the economy.

      This is why I'm withdrawing my support/patronage of companies that outsource. I say that I'm fine with India or whatever country creating an industry, but for greedy western companies to outsource based on profit margins is callous to the extent where Nike can now claim to be doing good.

      Add to this the relative 'danger' of shifting your financial records to Asia and there is a situation waiting to happen.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  21. You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Consumers expect top quality products, but are not willing to pay for it. As is commonly known, the margins for computers are razor thin. On top of this, when people want top notch service, how can the companies provide it? I am sorry, but the companies are not wrong to cut some costs where they can by using offshore support for a product with very little margins.

    If you want service, buy a service contract from someone local. As in come to your home and fix it.

    1. Re:You get what you pay for by Corwn+of+Amber · · Score: 1

      >If you want service, buy a service contract from someone local. As in come to your home and fix it.

      Yes. Or, do the same I did : buy a Mac and sign up for their expensive support service.

      I first thought it was overpriced, but reading all these stories, and remembering how painful it was to teach non-tech people how to use Mozilla Thunderbird (how much simpler can a program go than THAT?), I think it might just have been a good idea to pay for a service I might need... and paying workers is expensive for everyone, even Apple...

      --
      Making laws based on opinions that stem up from false informations leads to witch hunts.
    2. Re:You get what you pay for by sjames · · Score: 1

      I certainly agree that when the customer pays bottom dollar, they simply can't expect much in the way of support.

      The problem is companies that slash prices to the bottom AND claim to have great tech support when, in fact, they don't. With that going on, it's nearly impossable for another company to compete based on REALLY having great tech support and figuring those costs into the price.

      The same argument goes for all exaggerated claims in advertising. Everyone claims to provide 'unlimited bandwidth', 'unlimited support', and the 'highest quality available'. The majority actually provide none of that.

      The consumer gets to the point where they decide it's all a crapshoot anyway and that price and quality have little if any correlation. So they just buy the cheapest available to minimize their losses.

      Putting some teeth back into truth in advertising laws would do a lot to restore healthy competition that doesn't just race directly to the bottom. In turn, that would open the way for workers who are actually knowledgable and personable to make better wages.

    3. Re:You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had very good experience with even the normal tech support from Apple. And it was not that I had a technical problem, I just wanted to get the gadget they gave away for free on a promotion although I've missed the deadline to send the voucher in. So in fact, it cost them money if my problem was solved. But, no problem, they agreed to send me the item as fast as possible, and even called ME back when the connection broke down (problem was on MY end). I can only recommend them!!

  22. money to be made? by spectrokid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, can all these outsourced IT'ers make a living driving around town with an AD-aware CD in their back pocket? How much is the average user prepared to pay for saving his butt?

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    1. Re:money to be made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the uk (for me at least) its around £30-40 per home machine.

      That includes cleaning off all the nastiness, installing either a popup stopper or firefox etc.

      Not bad really, getting a machine back up and running in under an hour, having a brew and a chat to the users. Its just a bonus to be paid for doing what I would do anyway.

    2. Re:money to be made? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      They're not prepared to pay. That's the problem.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  23. More dumb users by nuggz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tech support is expensive.
    Users are getting dumber and calling tech support for things they shouldn't.

    Ever hear of someone calling their ISP to help them clear disk space to install the ISP software?
    They can just hang up (frustrated customer)
    Or they can help the customer, this is expensive, so get a lower level cheaper tech to do it.

    That being said I rarely call tech support for anything other then my ISP is broken. Even then I've just about given up, when I telnet to the smtp port on my mailserver and it replies with an error message, they want me to reboot my computer.

    1. Re:More dumb users by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

      In the old days of the ISP business,
      before mega-isps inhabited the land and support was handled by many people in fields of cubes,
      when the tech support sat at folding tables on slow pcs themselves,
      and the isp charged 25.00 for dialup slip,
      an admin could actually fire customers who consumed too much tech time,
      "I'm sorry, we do not have the ability to assist you any further, we are terminating your account".
      To which they would respond with shock, profanity, and then it would set in,
      they in-fact are ignorant and they may wish to get a clue if they desire to be on the internet.

      What other thing in day to day life allows people to throw their hands up and say I don't know Certainly not the IRS, the insurance company, the corporate documents, the accounting book work, college, high-school, the cop who just pulled you over, the stove, the coffee maker, the microwave oven, there is nothing else in modern life you can refuse to get a clue on and the people in the industry will basiclly bend over backwards to help you.

      This I believe is the problem, people are not self-sufficent when it comes to tech, they give up, and throw a tantrum on the floor when it refuses to operate the way they think it should.

      Oh and to reply to the above, cancel your fucking ISP, stop paying them money, it is the only thing that will make them see their mistake, and by the time they do, it will be too late.

      I worked at an ISP where the mail was always fucked, we knew how to fix it, but it couldn't make it's way through the maze of incompitence to be approved to be fixed. They went bankrupt, and got bought for pennies on the dollar.

      ATT is a prime example of this, which my contract is up, by by to them.

      Let the capitalist ecosystem work and those who are unable to meet expectations will be weeded out.

    2. Re:More dumb users by bfields · · Score: 1
      Tech support is expensive.

      This is what it all comes down to. Consider how much you'd have to pay someone with even a minimal part of

      • the technical background to learn quickly about the products they're supporting,
      • the troubleshooting skills required to diagnose and fix a problem over the telephone with an inexperienced user,
      • the communication and people skills to work well with users who themselves have a wide variety of communication skills.

      Now add in overhead and figure out how much you'd need to charge people per minute for decent technical support. Compare to the cost of your average piece of consumer electronics. In many cases it might cost less just to send the user a replacement than to have spend time with a valuable tech.

      The only cost-effective solution is to spend money on the products themselves so they need less support. The R&D required to make your software secure and usable by default is also expensive, but it only has to be done once and then can be spread among all your users.

      The argument over whether to spend minimum wage on domestic tech support or even less on outsourced support is all besides the point. Tech support, at least for commodity consumer products, is dead.

      --Bruce Fields

    3. Re:More dumb users by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "That being said I rarely call tech support for anything other then my ISP is broken."

      Same here, but here's my experience:

      Me: My internet access breaks at your routers. Can you fix the problem?

      DirecWay: What operating system are you using? Let's check your settings.

      Me: It's not my operating system. Your routers are dead.

      DirecWay: What operating system are you using? Let's check your settings.

      Me: It's not my....-sigh-...fine....Mandrake Linux.

      DirecWay: What's that?

      Me: It's an operating system.

      DirecWay: I'm sorry, we only support Windows [many versions]. We can't help you with other operating systems.

      Me: It's not my operating....-sigh-....fine, hold on while I [pretend to] switch to Windows [some arbitrary version I don't have].

      DirecWay: [pretending to guide me through something useful, and me pretending to follow through on my phantom Windows computer].

      Me: [after a lot of wasted time]. See, there is nothing wrong with my computer.

      DirecWay: [after putting me on hold for ten minutes] Our senior technicians have determined that our routers are malfunctioning. They should be back online shortly.

      Me: No shit....

    4. Re:More dumb users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What to do about Tech Support has always been an issue in the IT field (25 years in IT here).

      The ethical company sucks up the expenses and offers good tech support realizing customer sat is going to sell them more in the end.

      The unethical company doesnt.

      You tell me where the IT industry is headed.

    5. Re:More dumb users by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1
      That being said I rarely call tech support for anything other then my ISP is broken. Even then I've just about given up, when I telnet to the smtp port on my mailserver and it replies with an error message, they want me to reboot my computer.

      I think I've figured it out. The tech support person doesn't have the slightest idea what is going on with their servers/routers, and isn't in a position of authority to do anything about it. Telling you to reboot, check all your settings, etc. is a stalling tactic, hoping that by the time you're done with all that nonsense, the people resopnsible will have actually fixed the problem. As a bonus, if it actually has been fixed, they get to make it look like the problem was on your end, not theirs.

      --
      End of Line.
  24. Simple solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    outsource to countries with low pay-rates and high standards of spoken English, such as New Zealand or Fiji.

    1. Re:Simple solution: by el_gibler · · Score: 0

      Fiji - what the ???

      Heh you'd be stumped talking to a NZ helpdesk.
      Try and understand this as a reply:

      "She'll be right" ;-0

  25. Question by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

    Could it be that the vast majoirty of people are getting smarter with PCs and therefore less people are calling in? And those that do call in are either computer illiterate or have a *serious* problem? I know as time goes on, my parents and relatives just ask me for help now instead of calling a helpdesk. I guess it end up being a case of what came first, the chicken or the egg.

    1. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Could it be that the vast majoirty of people are getting smarter with PCs and therefore less people are calling in?"

      No.

    2. Re:Question by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      I was being optimistic, I know...[sigh]

    3. Re:Question by smudge · · Score: 1

      More and more people are starting to use computers that never have before. These people are nearly computer illiterate and VERY frightened of the thing.

      People see commercials showing EVERYONE else has a computer, so they get one. They don't NEED one. (Really, does the average grandma NEED a computer ... no she can email with something like WebTV or go to the library; she uses a PENCIL to balance her checkbook; she plays cards with other ladies, etc.) Then they get this thing they don't understand. When it doesn't behave as expected, they have to call SOMEONE.

      Language barriers add to the frustration, but aren't the only problem. When Grandma calls Sears because her Kenmore washing machine isn't working, the person asks her some basic questions in terms Grandma understands. Computer help desks just don't seem to be that way.

    4. Re:Question by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      True, so this now begs the question: is support getting worse, or are users getting dumber? I'd venture to say both...bad combo.

  26. Good News For us Techs! by Braingoo · · Score: 0

    This sounds like good news for us techs we get pay raises for speaking english to bad all these years of 1337 speak have made me more uninteligble than the people it has all been outsourced to.

  27. but what are the results? by b-lou · · Score: 1

    The article is mildly interesting (though probably not really big news to /. readers), but what's really the result of mediocre support? It feels to me like US consumers will continue to buy Dell computers and just get used to complaining about tech support. As suggested by the article, there may be an opportunity for local techs who make house calls, but I have a hard time seeing how this is really going to hurt the big players in PC industry in the long run. Short run, they'll get some complaints. Long run, the guys in India will get better at speaking to customers in the U.S. and the complaints will decrease.

    I get that it's frustrating to have jobs moved from the States to India, but the problem is also with the computers themselves. Will the day come that computers no longer need tech support?

    1. Re:but what are the results? by Hans1732 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I can't resist, the computer doesn't need the tech support, the user does.

      And as for computers becoming stable enough to not need it, well, I would say sustainable and useable fusion power comes first.

      --
      Infinity plus one!
    2. Re:but what are the results? by b-lou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely agree with you on both points. I've been a tech manager for over 10 years and I always tell my staff, "we support people, not computers."

  28. Slashdot Headline Clarity Dropping by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given the headline "Tech Support Levels Dropping", I assumed it meant that companies were decreasing the level (that is, the amount) of staffing -- or at least decreasing staffing in the U.S.

    But what the headline is really trying to cmmunicate is that satisfaction with tech support is dropping -- especially overseas tech support -- which might lead to more tech support staff being hired in the U.S.

    So should I complain "Slashdot Headline Clarity Dropping", or should I just be grateful it's not a dupe?

    1. Re:Slashdot Headline Clarity Dropping by scruffy · · Score: 1

      It's because /. is cutting costs by outsourcing their headlines. You could already tell that it started with the color schemes.

  29. VOIP will help because of displays by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    VOIP telephony will improve the quality of technical support because by the time it is widespread, graphical displays will be widespread on desktop phones as well as mobile phones. These displays will be used by support technicians to display diagrams that answer questions unambiguously for the customer.

    1. Re:VOIP will help because of displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pleae put down the crack pipe and step _away_ from the computer.

      Regards,
      Employee,
      World's leading VOIP company

  30. Come to think of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you suppose Microsoft tested Clippy, before releasing him to the wild?

  31. getting paid to call hell by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I have actually been paid cold hard cash at my usual computer onsite repair rates to call a tech support line for a company whose name shall remain undisclosed and which rhymes with hell. Not just to sort things out since the unit was under warranty and my customer just could not under the accents on the other side, but to put the people on the other end of the line through some torture as well. The people were well pleased with the value of the entertainment they received. I say, with tongue only slightly in cheek, that I may consider this a whole new line of business.

    The company may be "saving money" by paying the people one fifth of what stateside would get, but I can say with confidence that the call took ten times longer than it would have if someone with competant computer knowledge was on the line. Rote reading from of a incomplete trouble shooting guide does not replace expert knowledge. The worse thing you can do to those folks is to follow there directions literally and exactly.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:getting paid to call hell by analog_line · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I completely concur. Right now I do work as a hourly computer consultant (or "tech support for hire" as I like to call it) and I charge full hourly rate for all time on the phone to the useless tech support people, which only really happens with Internet stuff generally, as I generally build all the machines my clients use myself.

      We do no advertising, and even then we have more work than we can handle sometimes, just through word of mouth. Personally, I hope computer stuff gets more and more compliacted and touchy, because that means more money for me. Plumbers make a damn good living, and I don't see why I don't stand to do much the same, seeing as the plumbing I work on is way more complex and far more prone to break down.

    2. Re:getting paid to call hell by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      so there you were, thinking yourself really tough, making fun of some poor sod in an out-source callcenter who never quite got the training from the not-to-be-named company to really do the job well, who can do absolutely nothing but follow a couple of silly script lines and who gets paid shit to swallow yours? bravo!

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    3. Re:getting paid to call hell by qwijibo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Plumbing is just a different discipline. The goal of plumbing is to get the crap out of your building. You really don't care what happens once it gets out of your building. That's someone else's problem.

      IT is about bringing some crap into your building while keeping other crap out. Calculated crap management is what makes IT a science.

    4. Re:getting paid to call hell by twbecker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I agree that the language barrier can only hurt tech support, I think people have forgotten how bad it was even when it was onshore. The salaries were still pretty low and the skill level of the support people reflected that. Think about it, tech support horror stories have been around much longer than the off-shoring trend. The fact that they're in India now just adds insult to injury.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    5. Re:getting paid to call hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work for a Fortune 100 corporation that outsourced its internal help desk to India. The main effect seems to have been that everyone now pesters me for technical support instead of calling the supposed IT department.

    6. Re:getting paid to call hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL... if only I had some mod points today :)

    7. Re:getting paid to call hell by FooDog · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know. If the "company whose name rhymes with hell" is the one *i'm* thinking of, I've never had a problem with their tech support. The few times I've called them about a machine that was under warranty and needed a new part, the person was easy to understand, listened to me, and had my new part in the mail quickly and effeciently. Granted, I was calling about very obvious things like the video card has suddenly started making everything look dim and streaked. I've tried different monitors with no result. In other words, I had already troubleshooted the problem before calling so the person the phone was able to skip all that drek. YMMV.

    8. Re:getting paid to call hell by Glamdrlng · · Score: 2, Informative
      Rote reading from of a incomplete trouble shooting guide does not replace expert knowledge.
      Thank you for pointing out that the language barrier isn't the only problem here. My primary frustration with Dell's tech support hasn't been the language barrier so much as it's been the technical proficiency or lack thereof. Plus, it's an insult to one's intelligence when you talk to three different techs in Bangalore and they all introduce themselves as "Bob", "Ralph", and "Andy".

      What's really sad is, when Dell did their tech support in house they had some awesome people on their staff, people who could walk you through taking a precision apart and putting it back together including telling you where on the motherboard things were located. Now? Not so much.
      --

      Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
    9. Re:getting paid to call hell by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
      What's really sad is, when Dell did their tech support in house they had some awesome people on their staff, people who could walk you through taking a precision apart...

      HP was the same, that was before they went "invent".

      It might cost you but you had guys on the line who knew their shit. Sort of "oh, it's the 4711, well we know that problem, just bang it gently on the left side and it'll be gone forever (the problem, not the 4711)".

      Now it just costs you...*)

      *) Not true for parts of their ex-DEC service. It'll cost you an arm and a leg, but the support quality is awesome and the dedication unbelievable. Well, now for consumer products...

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    10. Re:getting paid to call hell by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      The salaries were still pretty low and the skill level of the support people reflected that.

      Skill level?? Hah! How much skill is required to follow the tech support script?? Other than a basic command of the primary language they're likely to encounter?

      Offshoring tech support just means finding a shop with people that can read script and understand when the customer gets: 1) pissed off and hangs up; or 2) manages to fix their own problem.

    11. Re:getting paid to call hell by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which is why offshoring seems so good to many companies. If you're resigned to having shitty support, you may as well pay LESS for it.

      Incidentally, I've never had a better time of support than with my Apple gear. They always are cordial and knowledgable on the phone, they BELIEVE you when you say it's busted, they arrange all the pickup and delivery with a 5 day turnaround...and remember that battery recall from last week? I got mine the next day. Orderered after 4 on thursday, battery was on the porch when I got home. Could not believe it.

      Dis me for paying $300 over the cost of a comparably sized and priced Acer if you want. But it's been worth it already in headaches averted -- and I have two and a half more years of this stuff!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    12. Re:getting paid to call hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very true, but I'm glad I'm not paying you to write my resume!

    13. Re:getting paid to call hell by accelleron · · Score: 0

      I've had a few run-ins with D[h]ell tech support.
      My issue was concerning their Axim PDA, so I cannot vouch for their desktop/laptop tech support.

      As for my encounter, I had to spend about ten minutes on the phone with their guy in India to explain to them what was wrong: My record button was not working.

      My advice to save you some time with D[h]ell: repeat "manager" until you get someone with at least rudimentary English skills.

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    14. Re:getting paid to call hell by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm certain this has been posted on slashdot at some time in the past, but it's worth reading. (At least in my opinion)

      It is an article written by someone in tech support.

      You either have to subscribe or watch an ad. Sorry.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    15. Re:getting paid to call hell by W2k · · Score: 1

      Dis me for paying $300 over the cost of a comparably sized and priced Acer if you want.

      If I were to dis you for anything, it'd be for not buying the components separate and assembling them yourself. That's the best way to avoid headaches. I put all my computers together myself (save for the laptop - hard one to build yourself that) and if one breaks down (two out of three currently in use have never done so after 2+ years of almost 24/7 duty) I know what part failed, how to fix or replace it, and who to badger for a replacement (with or without warranty, though preferrably with). Granted, it's not as convenient as buying a beige box from an OEM and being able to rely on someone else's skills (or lack thereof) when it breaks. But it does save me tons of money and my computers very rarely break down because I selected every component myself. Whereas in a {D|H}ell, you get the cheapest crap they can get away with selling, with a life expectancy of five hours, times 365 days, times the warranty period, give or take some.

      When it comes to laptops, I'm very seriously considering an Apple next. But they better put two buttons on those touchpads first...

      --
      Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    16. Re:getting paid to call hell by Thantalos1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I formerly worked for said unamed company, in server support no less, and I can tell you exactly when things went down hill (in 2000). The managers became much more intrested in how little time you spent on the phone and not in how well you solved the problem. This is also when this company forgot that the only reason to buy their systems was the support, they are not cheaper, faster, nor more stable.

      Aside from that tech support has always been hit or miss. I have known people with excellent tecnical backgrounds who could fix the problem if they were sitting in front of the box, but were tottaly unable to work over the phone.

      I have always said that excellent (not just good) tech support is black magic. It cannot be trained in. Good and even great techs can be trained but the life expenctancy of most phone techs is 2 years.

      --
      -- Thantalos "You keep using that word, I dono think it means what you think it means."
    17. Re:getting paid to call hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies in the US hire just as many people with no computer skills to do tech support.

      Experts are not likely going to be on the helpdesk. I know helpdesk workers often consider themselves experts, but come on.

    18. Re:getting paid to call hell by BSDimwit · · Score: 1

      "If I were to dis you for anything..." It's a good thing you said "IF." The parent mentioned his experience with Apple's recentely announced battery recall, and unless you honestly think he would go to the trouble of sending his Powermac in to have the onboard clock battery replaced, a reasonable person would assume he was talking about a laptop computer. Building a computer is all fine and good if you are so inclined technically, but not everyone is... Another thing to consider is that perhaps the parent bought his Apple so that he could run Mac OSX instead of yet another Windows or Linux distribution...which would be rather difficult on anything other than Apple hardware. Now we can argue day and night about Apple's prices and perceived value, but the parent poster seems happy with his decision in buying a Powerbook even though it only has one button on the touchpad (BTW...USB mice with multiple buttons work flawlessly on Macs).

    19. Re:getting paid to call hell by The+Spoonman · · Score: 2, Funny

      And, besides that, plumbing's easy. There's only two things you need to know:

      1. Shit goes down.

      2. Payday's Tuesday.

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    20. Re:getting paid to call hell by greatone · · Score: 3, Funny

      no my father always told me there are 5 rules to plumbing.

      1. Shit goes down
      2. Air goes up
      3. Hot on the left
      4. Cold on the right.
      5. Payday's Tuesday

    21. Re:getting paid to call hell by allism · · Score: 1

      I agree on asking for a manager. We had to ship our laptop in for the end-of-the-warranty-fix-everything jobbie, and we needed the case, the hard drive, and the DVD-ROM replaced. When I called, the tech support guy just kept repeating "We don't replace hard drives." After hearing this about ten times, I asked to speak to a manager, since I KNEW the hard drive was covered. Turns out, what he meant was "We don't replace hard drives in-house, we ship it to you for you to replace."

      They got my laptop back to me damned fast, though, when replacing the case...shipped it out on Friday afternoon, got it back Monday morning.

    22. Re:getting paid to call hell by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmmm....you're right. I need to have a talk with my plumber! :)

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    23. Re:getting paid to call hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I have a lot more knowledge than required to give good advice for general primary PC tech support yet I couldn't even get a job in that field when I was looking. Meanwhile, hundreds of clueless people in India were being employed to do the same, simply because they cost even less than me.

      Yes, they get paid a lot less, but the cost of living there is proportionately even lower, so it's me getting a shitty wage for doing a job well vs them getting a fair wage for doing a job badly.

      The least they deserve is to be mocked.

      (Turned out nice in the end. People really do prefer those who can attend your computer, offer friendly advice and speak your language, and I'm now making a fair amount on local PC repair/support/etc. as a sideline to further study.)

    24. Re:getting paid to call hell by MaestroRC · · Score: 1
      When it comes to laptops, I'm very seriously considering an Apple next. But they better put two buttons on those touchpads first...

      You know, you can set the mouse (with some non-Apple software) to left-click when you tap, and right click when you use the button. Or use an external mouse. Or just realize that it just isn't that damn hard (and I've found it to be faster, IMHO, since i switched about a year ago) to just hold ctrl with your left finger, that is generally already on/near the keyboard when you need a context menu (read right click) on something.

      --
      I hate sigs...
    25. Re:getting paid to call hell by megarich · · Score: 0

      Your telling me. I shudder everytime I have to call Dell or IBM to get a hardware problem under warranty fixed. Anyone with a half a brain can tell what the problem is but that doesn't manner because you still have to go through their baby steps. I can understand why they do this(personal home computers) but for business they should come up with a little better standard.

      Fine whatever, annoying but I can deal with it. What I can't deal with is the red tape(especially in IBM) with all the tranferring around they do. I don't even know where to look to get help anymore sometimes. I call one number they tell me to call so and so, I call so and so and they tell me no you have to call this guy! Its very frustrating when you have little time on your hands to deal with such nonsense.

      I guess what I'm saying I agree with you. Don't manner where its coming from it still sucks all the same.

    26. Re:getting paid to call hell by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Oh, stop it with the self-righteous bullshit already.

      That poor sod on the other end of the line chooses to work for Dell, and is a valid representative of the company. If he gives hell to the tech support guy, he is venting his frustration to the company, not the person. If the poor sod on the other end doesn't like it, he can voluntarily give up his position so that a poor American sod can take his place.

      Throw out the rhetoric concerning human morality when companies become involved. They profit off of us, and have an obligation that is in writing to provide us with satisfaction. Some moron that can't read English, much less speak it, deserves what he gets for trying to fill a role that he is not qualified to fill.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    27. Re:getting paid to call hell by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Dude, I built my own computers since I first put an 80 column card in my Apple ][. I had a string of x86s starting with a 386-40 in 1989.

      I hated it. Absolutely. All that time spent debugging hardware failures, rebuilding operating systems, calling RMA lines, dealing with shady "cheap" hardware dealers -- and I was still spending close to $600 a year to "keep up with the joneses." I didn't even buy ghetto hardware, I just used it so much and had so many add-on cards and tweaks that even when I built a "stable" machine, it rarely lasted six months. When my last machine, an Athlon Tbird that was in working condition on a Win2k install for a record 2 years, started getting these wierd 30 second hiccoughs with 0 CPU utilization every time I'd try to play a movie file I said, "nuts to this!" I was tired of having people ask "We're Quakin' tonight, is your computer working, das?", didn't have the time or energy to figure it out and didn't have the heart to pay some joker to reinstall my OS.

      So I bought a PowerBook. I love it, though it too has given me a little grief (mostly due to running OSS that did not play nice with OSX and corrupted the shit out of my filesystem) at least I don't have to fix it. The guy at the Apple Store did it without losing my crap and I had a good time talking to him while he worked.

      Incidentally, if two buttons is the only thing keeping you from a PB, just fucking get one and stop complaining. You do not miss the right click, especially not once you get used to your left hand being the "meta hand." You quickly realize having two mouse buttons does not improve your workflow as much as it impedes your ability to "guess" new functionality. In fact, when I use my Bluetooth scroll mouse, I rarely touch the right mouse button (the middle button, which i map to Expose All, I use all the time).

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    28. Re:getting paid to call hell by scumdamn · · Score: 1
      Speaking as the writer of the technical support scripts, it's not as easy as you think.
      • First, there is never a good way to search for articles and find them every time given the abundance of different. symptoms.
      • Second, the trees/flowcharts are never going to be perfect and are never going apply to the symptom 100%.
      • Third, most calls are spyware or OS. You just can't make a script for that kind of thing.
        Remove startup items, repair, reinstall is usually the way you go if you can't get a customer to download Spybot or Adaware as it's the fastest. I mean, sure, we put things in there like "Delete the winsock and winsock2 keys and reinstall TCP/IP over itself" but do most people want to do that? Not really.
    29. Re:getting paid to call hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hah, me too - small towns (pop 1400) are great for word of mouth, what else could I ask for.

    30. Re:getting paid to call hell by jonnystiph · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so there you were, thinking yourself really tough, making fun of some poor sod in an out-source callcenter who never quite got the training from the not-to-be-named company to really do the job well, who can do absolutely nothing but follow a couple of silly script lines and who gets paid shit to swallow yours? bravo!

      Bravo yourself! Not in the sarcastic context either. I am so glad that someone brought this up. Call centers are crap. Tech support is hard work, espicially over the phone, and espicially considering these are entry level tech jobs. How many people have worked a Tier 1 phone support job and had a fair-good understanding of correct T-shooting techniques of computers.

      Now, I am a unix admin. At one time not too many years ago, I was that asshole on Tier-1 support that knew enough about customer service to keep you from hating the company, but not nearly enough about your computer to keep you hating me. Please people, these are just people that need to keep a job, just like anyone else. Yes, you know more than them, big fucking deal. There are plenty of people out there that know more than you. That and there are plenty of people that could turn your body into pulpy mass, but hopefully they don't. There are laws against physically abusing someone, but none to protect from mental abuse. This job is hard enough, let them and thier shoddy training be, ask to be esecalated, chances are you can and will be.

      just my $.02

      --

      If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

    31. Re:getting paid to call hell by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      I'm currently in-house tech support (call center operator) for a higher-learning institution. The people there all have this horror story:

      I called up and got voice mail 3 times! Then when he answered the phone, he didn't know what I was talking about!

      Well, here's some math. 1 operator for 1000 faculty members and staff. I wonder why you end up on hold? And as far as me not knowing what you're talking about, "I clicked the thing and it didn't go" does not tell me either (a) what you're trying to do nor (b) what some of the problems may be. There are some idiots out there answering the phones, but there are a thousand more placing the calls.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    32. Re:getting paid to call hell by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Funny

      The problem is that #1 is not always true. That's when you really need a plumber, and generally at weekend rates.

    33. Re:getting paid to call hell by twbecker · · Score: 1

      Well there are always exceptions, and I know how stupid people can be about tech stuff (Insert obligatory cupholder reference here). But the fact is that most tech support centers now do not have knowledgeable people answering the phones. If your problem can't be solved by one of the hand-holding scripts they have on file, you just get the runaround. It sounds like you work in a shop where you're actually empowered to try and solve people's problems yourself, rather than hoping the scripts can do it for you; consider yourself (and your customers) lucky.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    34. Re:getting paid to call hell by W2k · · Score: 1

      You built your machines quite differently from me, then. Hardware always fails for a reason; usually that it was of poor quality to begin with. I spend a lot, maybe $4-5k in one go, and then I keep that computer virtually the same for a few years. My current one is on its second year and I have yet to find a game or application which it can't run sufficiently fast to meet my needs - this includes recent games such as D3.

      Dealing with "cheap" hardware dealers, buy new hardware each year/month/quarter, or tweak the system beyond sanity for a few extra FPS/MHz, is something I just do not do. My experiences when I was younger and many of my friends' experiences (past and present) have clearly shown that that's not the way to go.

      Then there is the laptop question. Of course, the lack of a second button is not the only thing keeping me from a PB, or I'd have gotten one already. The other thing is the distinct lack of any concrete advantages to justify the extremely high price. Yes, Macs are different from PC's, but I've never found them to be in any significant way better (remember, I'm comparing with the boxes I built, not Dells). For laptops, the price difference is less important (since building my own is not an option anyway) but it still seems I need to shell out $3k+ to get a PB the specs of which match my current cheap-ass IBM. Yes, the IBM breaks now and then. Most of the time however, it runs just fine. I intend to replace it before the warranty period runs out. Let's assume a PB wouldn't break as often. I'd still want to replace it in three years' time to keep up with new tech. How would I benefit from getting a PB?

      --
      Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    35. Re:getting paid to call hell by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 1

      That story is crap.

      I worked in tech support and with tech support and i can tell you that when i have to call india sure they can read a script. But when i call i'm not calling for the script, I'm calling for a real problem.

      And even if Rashad in Indian has been trained to speak with a Texas accent he still can't understand English well enough to deviate from the script and doesn't understand what I am saying.

      At least someone who doesn't know can say, I don't know, but so and so does, let me transfer you.

      Indian tech support sucks and so do the companies that use it.

      --
      -------------------------------------
      Technically, we are beyond survival.
    36. Re:getting paid to call hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>>>>

      So freakin' what? If I knew enough to solve the problem, I wouldn't be calling the so-called freakin' "Experts", would I?

      Tell me buddy, what good does the "Blind leading the Blind" do for anyone...other than make me give up after wasting large amounts of precious time and seek third party help out of desperation? All the while, precious American JOBS are being sent overseas!!!

      Screw this Off-shore crap!!!!!!!

    37. Re:getting paid to call hell by c0n5tant · · Score: 1

      Exactly right - offshore isn't the issue, quality is a management problem and that sits where? In India? I don't think so!! No question, there are compelling arguments to go offshore and it obviously works for product because all my (quality) **ll boxes are the "product of more than one country". The "skill" argument doesn't hold - it's clear that many developing countries have people with outstanding technical skills - maybe the mistake is assuming cheaper means worse (?). And finally - here I can't speak for India because I'm in South Africa - call centres aren't run out of lean-to's - infrastructure is as sophisticated here as anywhere in the world - ask me, I design and implement them for a living. And lastly finally, if language is an issue, there are exceptional alternatives for those who would take the time to look around.

    38. Re:getting paid to call hell by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I work for a Fortune 100 corporation that outsourced its internal help desk to India. The main effect seems to have been that everyone now pesters me for technical support instead of calling the supposed IT department.

      Been there, done that (well, Fortune 500, not 100, but still big and stuffy enough to be into outsourcing IT). The fact that all the local people wind up doing their own tech support is a cost that will probably never wend its way into corporate overseas cost analysis.

      As another great anecdote: I remember finally getting in touch with the (clearly Indian) people at the network operations center because I needed to know whether they could add a CNAME pointing at a name in a domain outside of company control, or whether that would violate IT policy. I don't think I've ever run into a DNS admin before that draws a blank on the term "CNAME" but responds to "alias" and has no idea what an "IP block" is.

    39. Re:getting paid to call hell by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      all in all, I sympathize, yet i can perfectly understand the company's decision to get (arguably) the same level of support for less money. Being dutch myself, we have a lot of callcenters around here due to national tendency to speak generally at least 1 language besides our own, often 2, sometimes even more, combined with locations that host lots of foreign students, so plenty of callcenter work around here.

      And yes, people still prefer techsupport folks they can actually see while talking to them, well, generally anyway. Some of the folks I've seen working on the phone should stay right there, or at the very least been given a long shower, a toothbrush and a brush-up course on inter-human communication :/

      personal observation: it's a heck of a lot easier to take someone who knows nothing about tech but has good manners and turn that person into a decent agent than to do it the other way around. fact is, knowledge is only like 30% of the job. the rest of it is 20% patience, 30% manners and 20% timing(knowing when to press the mute button)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    40. Re:getting paid to call hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being the guy that things go to when Tier-1/L2 can't solve the problem and things get escalated to the executive level at a company, Let me point out what typical percentages of systems have problems that tech support cannot solve - for consumer systems you are talking about the range of 2%, give or take 0.5%, for corp/gov/edu buyers drop a point. I believe these numbers are roughly universal among the top tier oem's. Guess what, these numbers actually outshine FDA standards for foods you eat and products you rub on your skin. But people don't bitch as much about a rash from a liquid soap as much as they do about how they bought an uxga display on a 14" laptop and can't read the text since its so damned small and it hurts their eyes, and then tier 1 can't solve the issue with changing font sizes without making text display blurry (if you don't understand why that is, go study).

      About half of the issues I deal with are with DOA systems out of the box. This problem is easily solved with a replacement with a brand new system or upgrade. But if you've owned a system for a few months and collected enough spyware to slow it to non-functional, don't come crying to me. If you crash your car into a wall 2 months after buying it, good luck getting the dealer to give you a refund for being a dumbass. Bottom line is computer ownership comes with expected responsibility. Don't try to sue an oem because your hard disk died and you didn't have the common sense to make regular backups of data that you depend upon to make a living, you just won't get anywhere - we will replace the drive but beyon that users have to assume some responsibility.

    41. Re:getting paid to call hell by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Sounds like IT jobs too! ;-)

      --
      +++OK ATH
    42. Re:getting paid to call hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who used to work the Dell support, it was hell:
      average of 100+ calls holding,
      allowed call time of 12-16 minutes per call including wrap-up(saving case notes) between calls,
      auto-ready auto-answer phones,
      database going offline daily,
      60 minutes off the phone per 9 hour shift,
      having to escalate for replacement parts and if my notes were not punctuated correctly I'd have to call the customer back on my break time,
      knowing the TS we had to step through wouldn't touch the issue but getting docked if we went straight to the actual answer.
      That and starting at 9$US/hr with medical benefits for just me being $80/two week paycheck.

      I only lasted two months before I got canned for failing to follow established procedures.

    43. Re:getting paid to call hell by ChreodeRiot · · Score: 1

      You see, here's the problem. This guy works in tech support on the "escalated to the executive" level. Read above as he tells you "there IS no problem"

      If there's no problem, than what are all these people complaining about?

      Let me point out what typical percentages of systems have problems that tech support cannot solve - for consumer systems you are talking about the range of 2%, give or take 0.5%, for corp/gov/edu buyers drop a point.

      Yeah, I've got some sour news for ya jack, The percentages of problems that I have personally had solve by tech support is probably around 40% at best. And escalation has a success rate of about another 20% (either through inability to solve, or unwillingness to call me back or get on the phone) bringing that total up to around 60%. "Guess what, these numbers actually outshine FDA standards for foods you eat and products you rub on your skin." Well, guess what you! When you pull the numbers out of thin air you can compare them favorably to whatever you like (12% of all people know that! :)) People who work in tech support are generally speaking, poorly trained and under-skilled. when I worked in tech support, it was for a system i had ZERO experience with and everyone answering the phone had never actually used the system! I was put on the phone immediately with nothing but a 3 ring binder filled with scripts that were rife with inaccuracies and vagueries. I worked there for three months and got out as fast as I possibly could.

      Ok, so I'm saying you pulled the numbers out of thin air, I'm sure the reporters who make the reports in your department probably have some sort of process by which they came up with these figures (most likely involving some sort of interpretive dance) but the other posts in this thread show otherwise (and really just talk to anyone out in the field) tech support is a "maybe" thing at best.

      Maybe your company does have that much success and if so, great, but your post has the tone of indicating that ALL tech support issues have a 98% success rate, but I have been on both sides of this issue, so I feel confident saying that what you are saying is just not true.

      I respond well to good customer support. I DEFINITELY buy products from manufacturers who have provided good tech support and hassle free replacement. It's a major consideration for me when making a purchase.

      The point in the previous paragraph is that you're not doing yourself or anyone else any favors by convincing yourself and those you work with that the industry enjoys a 98% tech support success rate. Admit you have a problem. And the point of this whole post is whether you admit it to yourself or not, it's insulting the way you just dimissively sweep aside the concerns and comments made in these other posts.

  32. Documentation from hell by Vo0k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People who work at User Support, and especially people writing manuals should be FORCED to use software (general) in language version they support.

    I got a CAM program with translation to English. The problem is the translator apparently never used any english program himself, learnt english at school and never had to use it really before the translation. Examples? (with my translations)

    Secure Tool - save the tool set to a file.
    Save Under
    Programme End
    Displace - move
    Edit Row - (the only way to enter text into project)
    Demark - unselect
    Adjust position - move point
    Size line - measure distance
    Clearance - material to be removed by the CNC

    No, the program is not an after-hours shareware. It's a multi-thousand-dollar commercial software, a flagship product of the company that makes it. And no, it's not really crappy. The backend is marvelous. It's the frontend and translations that really suck.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Documentation from hell by houghi · · Score: 2, Informative

      People who work at User Support, and especially people writing manuals should be FORCED to use software (general) in language version they support.

      Real situation: ISP in Belgium where people have a connection. Belgium has three languages and some people use English on their machines. So that is 4 languages you should have your hands on. Naturaly M$ renames their stuiff with every other version and translation.

      Next a Japanese person calls with a Japanese Windows who has problems with a connection. The next is an Italian. Next Russian. No, I am not making this up. The provider at that time had a lot of Ambassies as their customer.

      What you then do is just ask what it is in whatever language you at that moment speak (Most callcenter agents in Belgium are tri-langual) and try to figure it out.

      About the manuals: people don't read them. Even if you say that the solution is on page 12 of teir manual and the call they are doing now costs them 2EUR per minute, people still will not look in the manual.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Documentation from hell by anaticula · · Score: 1
      About the manuals: people don't read them. Even if you say that the solution is on page 12 of teir manual and the call they are doing now costs them 2EUR per minute, people still will not look in the manual.


      That might be beacause manuals nowadays don't tend to have much information. The few leaflets accompaning a new computer barely go beyond "insert power cord here - push 'on'-button".

      I remember browsing through my old Amiga 500 manuals once, just because I knew I could find the pin configuration for a parallel port in there. (Before the days of google et al.) Now, I'd consider myself lucky if I were to find that kind of info even in a motherboard manual.
  33. Why I will never buy from Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've had so many problems with my Dell laptop that I got to experience this drop first hand over two years. The first year had local support, so when my motherboard died, my ethernet port just stopped working, and my harddrive had a major crash, the tech support was able to understand me and have a replacement part sent out the next day, taking maybe an hour of my time each phone call. This caused me to think Dell had great support and I would recommend Dell to other people. Then the next year came and Dell had outsourced their support. In this last year I've had 4 hard drives die out on me, I was on hard drive 5 when the mobo died. Suddenly with a year left on my support contract they decided they didn't need to fulfill their end. Support didn't know what I was talking about, wouldn't give me contact information, and several times hung up on me. I finally got them to send a replacement computer, but it is slower than my original machine, and my additional equipment (batteries, chargers, modular drives) are unusable in the new machine. When I called them about these problems Dell support told me they would send out equivalent equipment and a replacement motherboard with comparable equipment to replace. So a week later after not hearing from them I called and find out my order was cancelled. So go through the same process. Called them back sooner this time to find out the same thing happened again, no replacement parts for me. It's now been 4 months since I got the original unit replaced and I'm yet to have Dell fulfill their end of my support contract. Bad tech support, bad customer service, and companies hell-bent on cutting costs at the expense of the customer are the problems, it isn't outsourcing alone (though a tech who speaks my language would be a nice start, I know I'm asking a lot...).

    If you require your computer to function reliably, or at least have good support when something goes wrong, stay the hell away from Dell.

    1. Re:Why I will never buy from Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did tech support for a ompany as a temp. They prefer Indian techs and they get to do anything they want eg. hang up on customers, cancel replacement parts and orders for no reason, never log calls, etc. If I did any of those, I'd be fired yet they can yell racism and/or cultural differences and they get off free. That is why tech support is a joke.

  34. I hate it when I'm right... by http101 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I've been predicting exactly this story for the past 2 years. Since I was laid off from my oilfield job, then later at HP, I've had a bit of a chip on my shoulder towards the companies that outsource not only my job, but a chance at life with a future.

    HP has been outsourcing our jobs for the past year, but when it comes to doing the dirty work, they call me and ask me to come back to work for a few weeks. What, am I their little bitch? I don't think so... you see, the Indians in India (ironic, isn't it?) are constantly screwing shit up and making my life a living hell. If these Big-Wig companies would use AMERICAN workers to do AMERICAN support, then there wouldn't be a huge decrease in sales!

    The "Language Barrier" isn't just the only thing getting in the way. Its the TOTAL LACK OF EXPERIENCE! These Indians have no idea what they're supporting and read everything from a script. Great, its a humanoid robot on the other end of my phone line.

    www.hireamericancitizens.org

    I used to be a firm believer in HP's quality, but since Carleton S. Fiorina took her seat in the captain's chair, the company has sunk to an all-time low. I'm not the only tech who feels this way and if we don't rise up against our employers and protect our futures as well as our childrens', we may not have a future left to protect!

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
    1. Re:I hate it when I'm right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Peculiarly enough, I've had the same experience with Non-Indian (read: American) tech support as well.

      Besides being inexperienced, and unable to communicate very clearly, they're also largely obnoxious and condescending, something which I am yet to see from an Indian centre.

      I don't know why, but I get this feeling that a large amount of tech support isn't bad because of it's ethnic background, but more because tech support workers are usually not trained much, except for a few days of "orientation" (which basically comes down to how to report, document and bill your calls. Not about the products you're supporting)

      The kind of support I sometimes look for can only be given by the developers, but they wouldn't be developers if they spend their time answering calls, would they? Invariably, the people who do support are not those who develop their products, and this will remain. It's all fine and dandy to spew forth large dollops of righteous indignation at every mention of a lost job, but the facts might not (in fact, do not) corroborate what you choose to say.

      This is not a troll, This is just information from my experience. Take it as you see fit.

    2. Re:I hate it when I'm right... by dave420 · · Score: 1
      There's more than a wee tinge of racism in your post, but I'll let it slide.

      Your job went to India because there's an Indian over there who will accept less money than you to do your job. Guess who's fault that is? It sure isn't the fault of the Indian.

      The free market, that wonderful creation America gave to the world, has turned the tide on America. America isn't that great a place to have a business, as Americans want higher salaries than most other nations. That fact means people will go elsewhere. Thanks to the free market, it's a lot easier to do that.

      That "hire american citizens" thing is a bit silly. What about non-American citizens living in the US? Shouldn't they be hired? Isn't that a bit xenophobic?

      Anyway, I've spoken to American tech support people before, and they're just as inept as tech support from anywhere else in the world. They just have an accent that doesn't make you, http101, feel ill.

  35. Explain this language...! by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    I am a non-native English speaking Slashdotter. Can those who have good command of the language explain this: -

    ...According to this story, based '[o]n a 10-point scale, the average level rated.... Why the [o]n?

    I have also seen words like [T]he being used in sentences. What is going on?

    Thanks a bunch,

    Cb..

    1. Re:Explain this language...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the original quote had a capital "O". The brackets denote the change to a small "o" to fit the quoting sentence.

    2. Re:Explain this language...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typically, that's an editorial notation. It's used to indicate that something between the brackets has been modified to fit a change in context.

      My guess would be that the the 'o' was changed from upper to lower case, so a line reading "On a 10 point scale..." fit into a compound sentence reading "based on a 10 point scale...".

    3. Re:Explain this language...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original article said 'On' and the 'O' was replaced with an 'o'. The [...] shows that the quote has been modified by the quoter (usually to make it easier to understand in it's new context). It is used more commonly when replacing pronouns like 'it' with the nouns they were referring to.

    4. Re:Explain this language...! by flitelog · · Score: 1
      In this case "[o]n a 10-point...", the [o] means that the letter "o" was not in the original quote. But for it to read properly, the editor replaced the "o" (it might have been an "a" for "an", or an "i" for "in" or something).

      The changed or replaced letter is put in [] so that the reader knows that the quote was changed to make it more readable. Generally, this is only done if it has no effect on the underlying meaning of the quote, but only affects the readability of the quote.

      You might also see it in this hypothetical case: Original quote - "The Americans, or at least the smart ones, are going to vote Bush out of office in November."

      But the quote might be reproduced like this - "[They] are going to vote Bush out..."

      That's not a perfect example, but it gets across the general usage of [xxx] in a quote.

      Disclaimer: Asking a bunch of techie-geek-nerds (myself included) about the subtleties of grammar and language usage can be dangerous!

    5. Re:Explain this language...! by Gleapsite · · Score: 1

      I beleive its a correction of capitalization to fit the context of the quote.

      the original probably read "On a ten point scale..." , but the author wanted to use this quote in a larger sentence of his own. the [] signifies a change by the author for clarity.

      --
      face the world with eyes of fire.
    6. Re:Explain this language...! by IL-CSIXTY4 · · Score: 1

      That is the MLA (Modern Language Association) standard for noting that you changed the case of a letter a the start of a quote. In the first case you give, the sentance in the article probably begins with a capital "O". But, since it appears in the middle of the sentance in the summary, "[o]" is used to show that the summary's author changed the letter to lower-case.

    7. Re:Explain this language...! by Kalixis · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm on about three hours sleep, beware.

      Using [o]n would be due to the original passage having on at the start of a sentence - ie, "On a 10-point scale...". If I quoted that, and had on as the first word, no change, it was capitalised before, it would be capitalised now. If on was partway through a sentence, we'd make the O in On a lower-case o, then put brackets around it to indicate it's changed from the original source.

      [T]he for the same reason - "I attacked the dog, which had a... " could be the original sentence. I could be quoting that in my own article, as eg "'[T]he dog, which had a...'". In the original the was not the start of the sentence, so it would be non-capitalised. Though in the article, the is changed to [T]he as a sentence must start with a capital letter.

      In short, [o]n and [T]he and so forth are just an indication that the quoted passage has been changed slightly from the original due to positioning of the passage in a sentence, or due to the placement of the quote in a new passage.

    8. Re:Explain this language...! by Zerth · · Score: 1

      actually, [sic] is where they deliberately do not change something so people don't assume the editor is an idiot.

      I believe it is latin for "so" as in "it was written just so" although I've seen it retronym'd to "spelling in context" or "spelling isn't changed"

    9. Re:Explain this language...! by Zerth · · Score: 1

      speaking of idiot editors, I left out a few punctuation marks myself:)

    10. Re:Explain this language...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The [o] notation is used to explain how much time a program will take to do a certain amount of work. I believe it is called "the cost function". This is explained using a function graph: the graphs drawn by the functions f(1), f(n), f(log(n)) and f(n*n), where n is the amount of tokens to feed to the program.

      A [o]1 program will take always the same amont of time. Even if you feed lots of data to it, it will
      take always teh same time. For example: hash tables.

      A [log n] program takes as much time as the logarithm of the amount of tokens: For example: 10 tokens will take 1 second. 1000 tokens will take 10 seconds, 10000 tokens will take 10 seconds, etc. I can't think of examples for this one.

      A [o]n program will take an amount of time proportional to the amount of data you feed to it. If it process 100 tokens in 100 tokens, then you can assure that it will take about 255000 seconds to process 255134 tokens. For example: searching a certain character in a 100 character long string will take double than searching in a 50 character long string.

      A [o]n*n (n to the square) program takes a hell of a time to process big amounts of data. 10 tokens take 100 seconds, and 100 tokens will take 100000 seconds! Adding elements to a simple linked list has this cost, since you must go throught all elements in the list to add an element at the end, and the list gets longer and longer, and each element requires more time to get added than the one added before. Just try adding 5000 files to your waiting list in the p2p program called emule, it will take ages to start and stop the program, because the waiting list has some weird algorithm with a [o]n*n cost, and emule has to built the waiting list when you start and destroy it when you stop.

    11. Re:Explain this language...! by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      The part in brackets is a correction applied by the editor.

      I.E. in the [o]n a 10...
      The original text likely had "n a 10...". The editor pick up that the author meant "on a 10...", but since he/she/it got it as "n a 10...", he/she/it ought not just correct without some indication of the correction. Hence the brackets surrouding what he/she/it changed.

      On the [T]he... the sentence was probably carved from the middle of a longer sentence and the original t was not capitalized. Again, just a notation so we know what the editor changed to correct things..

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  36. This is an easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason the approval rate of IT techs has dropped is obviously due to more sophisticated every day users who can tell you what HTTP stands for or how to use BIT-TORRENT, yet still can't understand why they have a 'NON SYSTEM DISK' in thier system when they boot up and will go crazy trying to figure that one out.

    So, they rate us lower because we can't fix thier cheap ass Pentium 3's or can't upgrade thier 128meg ram sticks because of the cheapies running our IT department.

    But if you want to increase the approval rating of techs, I don't see how a guy 3,000 miles away can make it any easier to help you pop your floppy out of your drive if you don't know what a floppy disk is or don't know where your ethernet card is or don't know where your phone jack is when you have Internet problems.

    It's just another excuse to pay cheapy prices for overseas CALL CENTERS - not REAL techs - and steal local jobs.

  37. Tech Support usage is dropping... by indros · · Score: 1

    because the users are just getting so much smarter!

    1. Re:Tech Support usage is dropping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are getting smarter, why do they call and ask why X software is asking to register for updates?

  38. Didn't RTFA by ceeam · · Score: 1

    But does it have anything to do with people needing support that happen to live outside of USA? I think if a German, for example, user would like to "talk to someone" they'd rather use someone local (to them) and not calling to US.

    1. Re:Didn't RTFA by Simon+Lyngshede · · Score: 1

      Also if you're calling from Germany, you most likely speak German and wish to be serviced in German. If I call my ISP I expect to take to someone who speak Danish... try outsourceing that to India. I think this mostly a problem for people in the US and other countries where English is the first language.

      On the other hand, we hear about so many problems with people getting poor support from people who they barely understand, I don't think the future of tech support is in India. I suspect that a lot of companies will start moving tech support back to the countries their customers call from. Of cause Im not an expect on the subject, so I may very well be wrong.

    2. Re:Didn't RTFA by BobTheAtheist · · Score: 1

      Maybe the solution is to make Indian the universal language.

      --
      -- You're too stupid to be an atheist.
  39. Language barriers?! Ha. by cniemira · · Score: 2, Informative

    I blame the vendors for cheaping-out on training and hiring qualified staff for tech support jobs. Of course, since tech support is considered the lowest point on the IT career totem pole, there aren't many qualified people out there to begin with... and those that are certainly don't want the piss-poor salaries paid to your typical phone jock.

  40. Re:frist psot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is very informative. Please elaborate...

  41. I knew I was in trouble by spidergoat2 · · Score: 1, Funny

    When I start asking a rather simple question and the next thing they say is "please talk slow, I understand".

  42. there should be their by Alien54 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    need more morning coffee. you all know how it is.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  43. Waiting Game by Baldrson · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What I've found, especially with Dell, is that the primary function of over-seas telephone support is to burn up man hours. Since man hours are less costly over there than here, it is cheap to get a client to simply hang up, thereby implicitly abrogating their part of the agreement and implicitly waiving their right to support.

    Its gotten so bad that I recommend people purchase generic computers rather than suffer the abuse of major name brand computers.

    1. Re:Waiting Game by rbmyers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is not outsourcing, and the problem is not cheap overseas labor. You can force people to wait on hold without any human intervention whatsoever. The strategy is called rationing by inconvenience, and Dell was using it long before offshoring became trendy.

    2. Re:Waiting Game by Baldrson · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to have someone on hold. (You can just put the keep the earpiece near your ear while you do your other work.) Its another to have a human live on the other end of the line. Its the latter that they have been doing.

    3. Re:Waiting Game by twifosp · · Score: 2, Informative

      What I've found, is that people always bring up Dell this, Dell that. Dell actually has the SMALLEST percent of it's technical workforce overseas when compared to it's competitors. In addition to that, the majority of the business accounts are being brought back into the US. Dell's outlook at one point was "Everyone is doing it, we'll do it too, only slightly better than everyone else." Well Dell did that, and everyone cried foul on Dell, and not all of the other vendors. They were used to crap from the other vendors. Who can blame them [customers] anyway? Dell sits there and advertises award winning customer support, when those awards were from like 3 years ago. It takes a long time to get to the top, but if you fall a little bit, you might as well have fallen to the bottom. I'll never understand why everyone cries foul on Dell and not everyone else. Either way, Dell's already announced major changes in bringing tech support back to the United States. Has any other major vendor?

    4. Re:Waiting Game by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      I've also had horrible experiences with Dell's Indian tech support-bad enough I'm inclined not to buy Dell equipment again.

  44. Automation? Make me laugh twice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, everyone loves those touch tone menus on the phones for everything else.

    Automation has improved the quality of life and service for call routing everywhere!

    Nonsense.

  45. Re:I needed support a few days ago by mobiusjava · · Score: 1

    Uh...obviously didn't read the faq for doom3. Took me ten minutes following the instructions on the faq. As for quake3, this is total bullshit. I bought the Loki version back when I barely knew how to spell linux but had decided to throw windows out the door. The install was easy as throwing the damned cd in the drive bay. What? Can't click an icon through konquerer? Christ...

    --
    Gotta find my destiny, before it gets too late --Ian Curtis
    http://www.shadowpublications.com/blog
  46. But who's to blame ? by Mr+Europe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Originally 'oh' means the letter not the number.

    Am-English are experts in finding new words and funny ways to use old ones. Who else would shorten Christmas as Xmas ? Its actually replacing word Christ with a PICTURE of a cross! It maybe funny, but why is it done? Other examples are numerous.

    As an example, even Finland has its own state (?) office which gives recommendations on new (and old) words, their spelling etc. This keeps the language more understandable and encourages a logic structure. We avoid using foreign language words when speaking Finnish or at least there exists a "proper" alternative. New words conjugate as other Finnish words etc.
    Of course it's the people themselves who finally decide which word will become used.

    Now if Americans cannot understand British-English, who is to blame ?

    1. Re:But who's to blame ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Oh' is used because it eliminates a syllable. It's faster, and to the majority of people we deal with, there's not an inkling of difference in meaning.

      X-mas is used because it shortens the word... oh wait, you already pointed that out... But the thing is it's not used all that often, and when it is it's usually used to save space rather than save time.

      The problem is not WORDS OR SLANG though, the problem is ACCENTS. Hell, YOU try and decipher what a heavily accented Cajun is saying...

    2. Re:But who's to blame ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this wasn't really your point, but I think X-mas, and the use of X to represent Christ in that context most likely comes from the Greek letter Chi (remembering that the new testament = Koine at least until the vulgate came on the scene). This also dovetails nicely into the whole Christ=Fish thing. X = Christ is thus not an innovation particular to american english, but fairly common in much of European iconography.

      OTOH, religion isn't really my bag, so what do I know.

    3. Re:But who's to blame ? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xmas

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    4. Re:But who's to blame ? by legojenn · · Score: 1
      I think that you are making an unfair comparison between Finnish and English. When Finns moved abroad, they didn't take their language with them, but the English did. They did so mostly by having a larger population than the original inhabitants (killing the aborignal poeples hastened the process a tad). Now these former colonies are independent countries. Do you honestly believe that people in Australia, Jamaica, the US, Ireland etc are going to accept being told how to speak by some sort of "English Academy" in London. I don't think so.

      For instance, if the history of North America turned out differently and the area that is now Manitoba and Minnesota had become "NewFinnLand", do you think that the new country they would accept the imposition of a language "controlled" by a foreign country no matter how positive the relationships are. Even the French, who have a very centralised control of their language through the Academie Francaise are not in touch with the rest of the world. I think the last time they added a French term was 'courriel' for email. I can't think of the one previous to that.

      I just want to reiterate that it is unfair to compare a language spoken as a first language by five million people in one country to a language used as a first language by close to half a billion people in dozens of countries all six inhabited continents.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    5. Re:But who's to blame ? by somegeekgirl · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about Finland, but it's doubtful that Finland has the massive influx of varied cultures and languages that the US has had since its beginning. Regardless, every language changes over time, no matter how many "proper language" nazis there are in a country. Christmas probably got shortened to "Xmas" because it is just that. Shorter. English (or "American English," if you will) is an extremely idiomatic language, probably because of the cultural influx I mentioned above. That's just how languages work. English just happens to change faster than many other languages, that's all. What's wrong with new ways to use words, anyhow?

      --
      http://angel.merseine.nu - Stuff for the poet, diva, geek, romantic and angel in all of us.
  47. Tech support has become infuriating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My recent experience was with Connectix - now part of Microsoft. My (legally purchased) copy of VirtualPC went south -- and my installation media was corrupted. Since Connectix was purchased by Microsoft, I had to call Microsoft for support to obtain a new copy of VPC. I was routed to a call center in India and spoke to four people over the course of four hours who couldn't get past the fact that I had the purchased the product pre-Microsoft and therefore could not provide them with a Product ID. Their "solution" was to install the product (with my non-working media) and apply the most recent patch so that a Product ID will be generated. THEN they can help me. In the end I finally just got on Kazaa and solved my problem by pirating software I already legally owned.

  48. The problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with technical support is systemic. The problem is Capitalism. The pig dog executives will stop at nothing to make money. In Capitalist America, you wait in line for a week to get help and deal with someone under strict time quotas, poor training, and poor systems. Bureaucratic corporate America takes the worst out of Soviet Russia, in the name of efficiency. We must stop this and prepare for the revolution!

  49. in other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    profit up, CEO salaries up, customer gouging up, fraud and deception up, false advertising up, poverty up

  50. Is it really the offshoring? by nial-in-a-box · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Frankly, I don't think that any company that supports Windows XP based PCs could possibly offer a satisfactory level of technical support. I am currently providing technical support on a college campus during move-in and what I am seeing nearly has me in tears. Malware was just starting to become critical during last year's move-in, but this time around it is simply shocking. I have seen countless brand new computers that are already impossibly crippled.

    What upsets me so much about this is not that Microsoft sucks at writing secure, reliable software but rather that there are so many people that are so willing to exploit it. Considering how many unique exploits there are on Windows XP, I feel that regardless of secure we think that Linux or BSD or Mac OS X may be, that if they had the dominant market share in their current state there would also be a large number of malware apps running wild on those platforms.

    When you consider that it takes a significant amount of time to diagnose and resolve malware issues properly over the telephone, it immediately becomes impossible to offer good technical support. Sure, there are other key issues, such as outright hardware failure, but when malware is slowing down the machine average call time automatically increases. So unless your policy is to shaft users (and their data) and tell them to reformat/reinstall/use the restore CD right off the bat, or you are willing to pay what it really takes to have enough reps to help your customers, then there is absolutely no way to provide satisfactory technical support. Not in California, not in Canada, not in India.

    --
    I am feeling fat and sassy
  51. HP Customer 'support' by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't even BEGIN to explain how BAD HP customer support is. Sometimes you will start off with an American support agent, and as they pass you off to 'technical' people I always end up getting switched to some Indian guy in Bangalore. I don't know why, but I can NEVER understand these guys/gals. I work with people all over the world, Latin American, European, Asian, and I can understand their accents. But never Indian accents. Now when something goes wrong with an HP product I always debate voiding my warranty and fixing it myself rather than going through the hassle of calling their 'hell desk'.

    Some problems I've had: Hard drive failure, HP Printer failure, Boot failure (required reinstall). On average, it takes me 4-5 phone calls with various people to get my case resolved. They never call you back, when they say they will. Their managers don't seem to care either. I can't understand how any business in the U.S. thinks this is good support.

    I would like to condemn any CEO/CIO who supports Indian outsourcing of IT help desk operations to having to use it for themselves, personally, every time they have a question/issue/problem with their PC. I bet $5 they wise up and stop using outsourcing overseas.

    Of course, that will never happen because the CEO/CIO always has their 'IT geek' in their pocket, who they can call at any time and they will personally show up and fix anything/everything that happens.

    I guess this outsourcing of the help desk to other countries (mainly India) is just another way to 'screw the middle class'. Can't get your problem resolved? Are you 16 hours out of warranty? Buy a new PC/HardDrive/Printer... because the help desk won't help you.

    --
    Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    1. Re:HP Customer 'support' by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Flamebait, sure, fine, whatever. It's a true story, and I've got more to back them up as well. I'm also part of a class action lawsuit against HP/Fujitsu for this whole harddrive fiasco.

      I f'in hate moderators. (Aren't you supposed to be paying more attention to modding things UP, not DOWN!?!?)

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
  52. Re:I needed support a few days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't quite accurate. You missed out the blank screen problems caused by the switch from 8K tok 4K kernel stacks in Fedora Core 2. You have to make sure you have the correct set of NVidia drivers for your kernel.

  53. again he misses the point though... by CiXeL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can compete with foreign workers (i work my ass off), i just can't compete with the increasing industry-wide pay cut that has resulted where now I suddenly cannot afford to pay for existing debts that I could afford previously.

    I'm already making plans for my girlfriend and I to move out of california now since it's just too expensive and there are increasingly less and less tech jobs here.

    The division seems to be between people who own a home and those who don't. Everyone I see who doesn't own a home here already is struggling and the ones who do are taking vacations. I've pulled out my savings to go on 'vacation' to the east coast to look for work.

    1. Re:again he misses the point though... by dave420 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So, you were being overpaid for your job when the market stabilised and re-adjusted itself, leaving you with a smaller wage which means you're not as well off as you were before.

      If IT workers didn't insist on inflated wages, we'd be a lot more happy. The jobs are going overseas as Americans ask for too much money to do what is essentially a basic task. Anyone can program a computer given enough books to read. Anyone can fix computer problems. It's not like it's a gift - IT professionals aren't "chosen by the elders" or "pre-ordained by the prophecy" - they're just guys and gals who type on keyboards all day.

      I'm not trolling - this is a point I've tried to make countless times on slashdot (but always been modded out of existance).

      The free market America tried to hard to push on the world has finally come of age. It was instigated when America was a very economically-viable place to have a business. Now, that free market has gained more momentum in other, more economically steady, parts of the world. Because of that, the jobs are now flowing the other way, which America doesn't seem to like.

      Something about cake and eating it springs to mind... ;)

    2. Re:again he misses the point though... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm already making plans for my girlfriend and I to move out of california now since it's just too expensive and there are increasingly less and less tech jobs here.

      Believe me, you'll be happy you did, and not because there are any more tech jobs outside of California than in (though there may be because companies are leaving CA for the same reason people do). Instead, it will simply be because you can actually afford to live on the same (or lesser) pay. At least, as long as you don't move to New York or somewhere with a similarly high cost of living.

      The division seems to be between people who own a home and those who don't. Everyone I see who doesn't own a home here already is struggling and the ones who do are taking vacations. I've pulled out my savings to go on 'vacation' to the east coast to look for work.

      This is simply because those that own a home either bought at a lower price than is currently demanded, or can actually afford a home at current prices. Even those with homes are often taking out 2nds on their home to live their lives and take their vacations.

      Before I left California the paper had a front-page story on a Habitat for Humanity house that was selling for $250K to a qualified low-income buyer, and housing prices have continued to go up since then. For $250K in some areas around here (Hampton Roads, VA) I can have a very nice house on a substantial piece of land, or a nice house on a smaller piece of land (depending on how close I want to be to work, basically; and that smaller piece of land is bigger than anything in a CA suburb).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    3. Re:again he misses the point though... by sapped · · Score: 1

      Anyone can program a computer given enough books to read.

      I have tried to teach numerous people in the past because I thought the same as you. What I found, however, was that some people simply didn't not think the right way to be able to program a computer. I am also not talking about technically illiterate people here either. My brother-in-law who can fix anything mechanical simply cannot string together more than about 5 lines of code.

    4. Re:again he misses the point though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BULLSHIT.

      This has nothing to do with inflated wages. Its got everything to do with Corps being run by the bean-counters who only care about next quarters profit margin. There is no long-term thinking involved here.

      And in reference to the maddox link: that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject at hand. Walmart hiring an immigrant (illegal or otherwise) because no one else wants the job is not the same as an IT person getting replaced by a foreigner for less pay. The Indians, Chinese, Russians, etc are not to blame here. (see above).

    5. Re:again he misses the point though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo hoo.

      Go to McDonalds and ask the guy behind the counter how he survives.

    6. Re:again he misses the point though... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      If he started early enough, he'd be great. That's the thing. Not being able to teach someone when they're older is not the same as not being able to teach 'em when they're a kid. Get them young, and they're set.

    7. Re:again he misses the point though... by dave420 · · Score: 1
      I know the going rate for developers in the US, and it IS high. There's no denying that. Just look at the numbers. Sheesh.

      It's not corporations suddenly turning round and realising they can make money elsewhere - that's been happening for years. What has happenened, is that IT staff's wages went up massively during the dotcom boom, and have tried to remain as high as they can ever since, which means they've effectively priced themselves out of the market. There's no-one here to blame but the IT workers and the IT sector. The companies are just doing what they have to to survive.

    8. Re:again he misses the point though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying anyone can program is like saying anyone can paint a picture or anyone can play piano. While I could read a book on either of these and maybe be able to pluck 'Mary had a little Lamb' out on the piano I wouldn't be proficient at it.

    9. Re:again he misses the point though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hand and mouth, probably.
      Crappy McD's jobs are okay to live on, as long as you don't mind your shitty apartment and neighbors and life never getting any better. Sure, it pays the bills, but don't ever expect to live in a nicer place or have a better quality of life than you've got now. Once the guy at McDonald's figures that out, he's going "Boo hoo" too, let me tell you.

    10. Re:again he misses the point though... by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      That seems to be the case in Toledo OH (no, no, stop laughing, I'm serious). However, the "home ownership" thing is weaker. And then there's the fallacy itself of modern home ownership, since too many people won't survive the 30+ years paying on a mortgage while they face decades of cyclic employment.

      I left Boston in 1997 to come to Toledo (again, I'm serious, please stop laughing) and I must move away soon. In the current environment, I can either lose my job or be thrown into the equivalent of "do you want fries with that" IT work (with corresponding pay). In essence, I must move again, soon. And so I've considered moving back to Boston.

      But Boston worries me. I did thrive there from 1991 to 1997, but in retrospect it was due to undercutting the high wages there. One boss told me in 1994 that he could have obtained a professional software tester for $50/hr, but he preferred to get 2 younger testers for $25/hr each, hence doubling the test base for the same money. At $25/hr, I was doing well ... but that $50/hr guy really lost out.

      But my Boston experience was my life's best era, and I want to return to that prosperity. My internal question is, can I recreate that same Boston re-entry as I did in the early 1990s? What do you think? Is that what you're aiming for too?

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    11. Re:again he misses the point though... by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      No one should mod you down; instead, we need to call your bullshit.

      Anyone can program a computer given enough books to read.

      That sentence alone shows that you have no appreciation for professions. Engineering, legal, medical ... all these are "read some books" and then "do some stuff". Wow, it's so simple! It must be some sort of conspiracy keeping everyone from becoming technical.

      May the market find your skillset and force you to bid it down to Third World levels since, hey, all anyone could do is read some books and do your job, right?

      ... you fucker.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  54. There is still one company offering great support by bradleyland · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know we're talking PC's here, but I have to say, Apple has awesome technical support. Are their margins any better than the PC manufacturers? I would guess that they are, given the price point of their systems. Maybe these people should stop compaining and start replying with their pocket book. I've called Apple tech support on three occasions and always had an extremely knowledgable, english speaking individual answer my questions. The one time I was outside the area of expertise of the rep, he quickly transfered me to someone who knew the area better.

  55. Re:low pay rates? english? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much as I dislike the incumbant (and I'm not even American), blaming Bush for poverty in the 'States is like blaming SCO for frivolous IT lawsuits everywhere, or blaming MS for all buggy software. Yes he is contributing to the problem, but he is not at the root cause. Blame the virus, not the symptom. The cause here is lazai faire capitalism taken too far, and a two party, "first past the post" system of politics with enormous barriers of entry for independant candidates. If you want reform, then fight for it!

    RsG

  56. USA Today Levels Dropping by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm guessing that the kind of people who read USA Today really *really* need manuals and tech support.

    And illustrations.

    And GUIs.

    And they probably love Clippy, too.

    "Ooh! Look! My little paperclip friend is back! Brandy, come look! Say 'hi', Clippy!"

    "Oh, cuuuuuuute!"


    I think it was Dave Barry who accused USA Today of being the direct descendant of Weekly Reader.

  57. Re:Why use tech support? by value_added · · Score: 1

    " I'm guessing that the kind of people who read USA Today really *really* need manuals and tech support."

    More importantly, it has to be in colour.

  58. Problem from both sides. by houghi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I agree that language differences can result in some problems. It is also the expectancy of the customer that has changed.

    Where a few years ago people who needed help were willing to do something themselves and were helping to find the solution, now customers just want it fixed. I am not saying that that is a bad thing. It just is a fact.

    Imagine when a few years ago someone called an ISP and said that his internet was not responding, you could ask to open a DOS window and do a ping and as a rep get the resukts in about a minute. Now you need to explain how to do that with the customer moaning that he does not understand it and that it should just work.

    I live in Belgium and Belgiun being a country with three languages, we understand perfectly what the situation is with language barriers. The Belgian-French is not the same as the French-French and Flemish is not the same as Dutch. The dialects that are spoken especialy in Flanders can be so different that the people from one side do not understand the people from the other side.

    The willingness of BOTH parties will result in a solution. If however one does not want to work with the other, you have just created a unsolvable situation. I have heard people who called in from France to the call center in Belgium and did not want any help from a Belgian rep. I have heard Belgians not wanting to be helped by Dutch reps.

    Luckily I myself am able to get support in 4 languages within several dialects, so for me personally the situation is non-existing.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  59. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  60. It's that man again... by mccalli · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    "One customer service call can easily take the profit out of a product," says Rob Enderle, an analyst at the Enderle Group in San Jose, Calif."

    Lord - is there no newspaper column he's not around to bung a quote in for?

    Cheers,
    Ian

  61. HP off-shored people are bad too by linuxtelephony · · Score: 1

    I have a Compaq laptop with an extended warranty. The first time, the experience with the people on the phone was frustrating because of thick accents and the "support" person not clearly understanding English (and very obviously using some kind of script). But, the repair went smoothly. This was at my current home.

    The second time, the people on the phone were even WORSE. Then, they shipped the return box to an old address. This was after THEY confirmed my address was correct, so they very clearly knew the right address. I called to ask where the box was, and they told me where it was shipped. I corrected them, and they shipped another box. Where'd it go? You guessed, to the wrong address AGAIN. It took a series of email messages and phone calls to finally get them to send a box to me.

    All in all, I probably spent between 3 and 4 hours on the phone, and had a laptop I couldn't fully use for about a month.

    The first experience was acceptably high that I bought my wife and HP computer when she needed one. Now, after this, I won't be so quick to buy another HP.

    --
    . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
  62. Re:Automation? Make me laugh twice! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Yeah, everyone loves those touch tone menus on the phones for everything else. Automation has improved the quality of life and service for call routing everywhere! Nonsense.
    Touch tones are not automation, they are just a different method of inputting information. Automation is going to be you speaking into the phone about your tech problem, and a computer guessing what you are speaking and figuring out the problem for most of the customers. There is still a long way to go, but saying that it will never happen is at best myopic and at worst naive. Hell, people are currently experimenting with systems that will write programs for you.
    Read Timequake by Vonnegut, pay attention to aculturation(not sure on the spelling), the computer is making more humans obsolete every day, and the number is only going to grow. Whether or not that is a good or bad thing has yet to be seen. So far it is a good thing, but that doesn't mean that the day will come when capitalism starts to break down because nobody can sell their labor to anyone else.

  63. Tech support is a clear differentiator by Webs+101 · · Score: 0
    Wretched support means frustrated consumers have to surrender time and often money. It could lead them to another PC vendor when they're ready to buy again. "Tech support is a clear differentiator," says Brownlee Thomas, a Montreal-based analyst with Forrester Research.

    I hope Apple can get all those G5 chips it's going to need....

    Seriously, though - as a journalist, I find it disingenuous that USA Today doesn't include Apple on its little table of tech-support satisfaction, especially since PC Mag

    • did
    include Apple in its survey.
    --

    "Even for Slashdot, that was a very obscure reference!" - Anonymous Coward

    1. Re:Tech support is a clear differentiator by WordODD · · Score: 1

      Ok, now while Apple is included in the PC Mag. survey in SOME areas the topic of this story is "Tech Support" which there are no scores mentioned for Apple. For a journalist you sure don't read things too carefully, maybe your tin foil hat or your Apple Fan Boy Reality distortion feild obscured your veiw of the link that YOU provided.

      --
      Please do not let scientific accuracy interfere with the intended humourous/interesting/insightful value of this comment
    2. Re:Tech support is a clear differentiator by Webs+101 · · Score: 0

      Whoops. You're right in one respect - I didn't notice that tech support had its own column and that Apple wasn't ranked. I don't see how you subscribe this to some enslaved devotion to Apple, however, and you're wrong to do so.

      --

      "Even for Slashdot, that was a very obscure reference!" - Anonymous Coward

  64. Marketing Doubleplus Groupthink by Tangurena · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A division of Sony runs Everquest (or evercrack if you prefer), and earlier this year they felt that replacing guides (volunteers who get nothing but free expansions and free subscription - worth about $200/year in forgone billing) with offshored salaried employees was cheaper to sony than the volunteers.

    Proponents of offshoring have propped it up as the new religion of business. Like the TQM or 6-Sigma of the past. Wildly irrational business decisions are being made by the groupthinkers who are today's and tomorrow's CEOs, because everyone else is doing it.

    1. Re:Marketing Doubleplus Groupthink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony gets a low score, but that's not surprising. This may be because their Vaios breaking so often. Not sure how accurate these reader survey-based quality level rating schemes are because I can see so many factors that can affect the rating in adverse ways, such as readers rating companies by perception rather than actual experience with tech support. While there's offshoring, and jobs within the state, this perspective doesn't account for jobs going to Canada or Mexico, and reader ratings of quality only tangentially manages to measure the level of offshoring.

    2. Re:Marketing Doubleplus Groupthink by Puls4r · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Bzzzt. Completely wrong. What happened here is that volunteers (whose name I won't mention) SUED the parent company and won because they were working more than they should have for "free". Since then, the volunteer programs of nearly every large MMORPG have been shut down because it's cheaper to pay for crappy help than it is to litigate against volunteers who suddenly want to be paid. Good try though.

    3. Re:Marketing Doubleplus Groupthink by jerky42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wish you could get modded up some more.

      Read CIO magazine, and they were all about offshoring for the longest time, even with no numbers. All the CIOs they interview are doing it, "just so they can have an answer for the CEO/CFO when he asks." The sad thing is, most of these people have been through the first outsourcing/insourcing craze, and just don't have the sack to tell their bosses that outsourcing/offshoring costs triple what you think it will in hidden costs and lost opportunities.

      --
      The strong do what they can, while the weak suffer what they must.
    4. Re:Marketing Doubleplus Groupthink by jafac · · Score: 1

      Wildly irrational business decisions are being made by the groupthinkers who are today's and tomorrow's CEOs, because everyone else is doing it

      Can you blame them?
      Just like in the 1990's, when a company could put a ".com" on the end of their name, and see their stock increase tenfold overnight. The market is rewarding this "latest *in* thing".

      Outsourcing is the pop-music of the stock market.
      Until someone else comes up with a better "sound" (or until the regulatory climate changes and makes it even less worth their while) - this trend will continue unabated.

      Basically, the meme I'd like to see blasted across the internet is:
      If you bought stock in a company because you read somewhere that they're cutting expenses by outsourcing - you're a damn fool.
      Buy stock in a company that doesn't have outrageous "rock-star-like" compensation for it's executive staff. For instance, Apple Computer.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    5. Re:Marketing Doubleplus Groupthink by festers · · Score: 1

      Completely right. Those bastard "voluneers" ruined a large part of UOs/EQs/etc help system with their greed. Talk about a Phyrric victory.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    6. Re:Marketing Doubleplus Groupthink by Gooba42 · · Score: 1

      Volunteering for a non-profit is a much different thing than volunteering to be free customer support. The EQ management offloaded too much work on people who had little or no incentive to be responsible with the power they were given.

      You have the case of a good guide spending more hours on supporting other players than on playing.

      You have the case of the bad guide playing god and having allegiances to certain guilds and groups.

      Neither one is the gig for which they had signed on.

      --
      I just found out there's no such thing as the real world. It's just a lie you've got to rise above. - John Mayer
    7. Re:Marketing Doubleplus Groupthink by dark404 · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming you're talking about Bratty, she was an AOL Guide. (First thing though, AOL Guides, and EQ Guides are totally different animals.) Bratty's case was that there were some things the volunteers had to do to keep their status that employees were being payed to do. One specific case was "member retention" i.e. when someone said they wanted to quit aol, the aol guide would have to go through the "But think of what you're missing" bs to convince them not to cancel their account. This occured in the very very very early days of AOL's program.

  65. It's the knowledge, not the accent. by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most of my nontechnical acquaintances are savvy enough to select "help" from a menu or read the glossy "getting started" summary card packed at the top of the box. If Clippy has the answer for them, they don't call tech support.

    The problem is not whether the person on the phone has a detectable accent or a professional demeanor. The problem is that for the last five years, tech support people, foreign or domestic have been human versions of Clippy. Only with fewer preprogrammed answers. The problem is that in so many cases they appear to be reading from a top forty FAQ sheet and cannot solve any problem that the average user can't solve themselves.

    I'm happy with anyone who actually solves my problem, and I'll be most other customers are, too.

    1. Re:It's the knowledge, not the accent. by TGK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem, as you so eloquently point out when you say "The problem is that in so many cases they appear to be reading from a top forty FAQ sheet and cannot solve any problem that the average user can't solve themselves," is that fully half of the users are dumber than that.

      That means that fully half of the questions are answered by reading off that sheet. Now, if 1/2 of your job can be done for you by reading the appropriate line off of a piece of paper, aren't you going to read that line? More to the point, if you're paying someone to do a job that, about 1/2 the time can be done by reading a known solution off of a piece of paper, aren't you going to insist that they read that line first?

      Sure, there are people out there with legitimate problems. They need legitimate solutions. If there was a way to filter the idiots out of the call queue so tech support could help the ones that actually need help (as opposed to the ones that need help reading) I'm sure they'd do it. As is, we're all at the mercy of the horde of vindictive idiots who insist that nothing can possibly be wrong with [insert product here] because it was working yesterday. Of course it was working yesterday; if it hadn't been working yesterday they'd have called in YESTERDAY. What changed? It broke! What's so hard to understand about this?

      Tech support suffers because of marketing and feature envy. People want the newest, fastest, latest whiz-bang contraption out there. Even my mother, who hasn't the faintest clue how to perform even the most basic functions with a PC is talking about how great a tablet PC would be. We introduce more and more complex devices to people who have fundamentally no idea what they're doing with them and then are surprised when they can't make them work!

      You don't buy a $4,000 amp for your first stereo. You don't buy a Ferrari Testerosa for your kid to learn to drive on. You don't teach a newly hired cook to make baked Alaska before he can make a grilled cheese sandwich. Why do we believe this doesn't hold up for computers?

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    2. Re:It's the knowledge, not the accent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that anyone who can actually solve your problem isn't working on helpdesk since he/she gets more cash on working on something else.

    3. Re:It's the knowledge, not the accent. by KillerCow · · Score: 1

      If there was a way to filter the idiots out of the call queue so tech support could help the ones that actually need help (as opposed to the ones that need help reading) I'm sure they'd do it.

      Most of the internal corporate environments have this. When you have a problem, you call the help desk and talk to a monkey in "tier-one." Their job is to find your problem on the common-problems sheet and give you a canned answer. This catches most of the "how do I" and "how come I can't" problems. If they can't solve it, it gets forwarded to a "tier-two" support person. They handle the queries that are not on the sheet and have skill and experience. They will diagnose the issue and help you resolve it. Occasionally they will call you back after researching. If they determine that it is a problem with infrastructure, then they will forward the problem for you to a "tier-three" tech who is charged with fixing things that aren't on client machines.

      They do this of course, because in a corporate environment, it is not acceptable to leave a problem unsolved, or to frustrate the caller. When that happens, someone's manager complains and it becomes a problem that is costing a department money. This doesn't happen in the consumer market because a customer's problem don't cost the company money, and because the customer can't hold the company accountable.

    4. Re:It's the knowledge, not the accent. by cromulence · · Score: 1
      You don't buy a $4,000 amp for your first stereo. You don't buy a Ferrari Testerosa for your kid to learn to drive on. You don't teach a newly hired cook to make baked Alaska before he can make a grilled cheese sandwich. Why do we believe this doesn't hold up for computers?

      That may be the case, but if you sell computers wouldn't it be great if some sap would buy a top of the line machine even if it's way beyond them. Of course a Ferrari salesman would be hard pressed to sell one of his cars to the parents of a new driver, but that's because the risks of inexperienced driving are well known. I think it is the (relative) newness of the computer industry that makes people not realize what they are getting may be total overkill. Instead they just see a cool new device that will make them the envy of their friends.

  66. Southern England accents are impossible. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Interesting
    No-one can understand them, not even other people from the south of England. That's why they all jabber away like bonobo monkeys on speed, seemingly without pausing for breath. I work in tech support, and I *dread* getting calls for anywhere south of about Birmingham.


    As an interesting aside, most call centres in the UK are in Scotland, because people perceive Scottish accents as educated and authoratative. English accents are, apparently, too annoying to be much good for call centres. Strange but true.

    1. Re:Southern England accents are impossible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As an interesting aside, most call centres in the UK are in Scotland, because people perceive Scottish accents as educated and authoratative. English accents are, apparently, too annoying to be much good for call centres. Strange but true.
      The Scottish accent has much to thank Sean Connery for. (For it can surely not be Mel Gibson(?))
    2. Re:Southern England accents are impossible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "The Scottish accent has much to thank Sean Connery for."

      Yesh.

    3. Re:Southern England accents are impossible. by csteinle · · Score: 1

      Kinda depends what part of Scotland. Speaking to a Glaswegian Ned or and Aberdonian is bloody hard work.

    4. Re:Southern England accents are impossible. by TheBracket · · Score: 1

      I grew up with a Southern England accent, and then moved to Hull to do my BA. At first, I found the Yorkshire accent very hard to understand - but I adapted pretty quickly, only to find that when I used it nobody in the South could really understand me anymore. Then, I moved to Missouri (USA), and found I couldn't understand the local's drawl at all - but a few weeks later, I was getting by okay. Now I have the amusing situation that I still sometimes can't make myself understood, but my English friends tell me that I sound like an American. I guess with accents, you really can't win!

      --
      Lead developer, http://wisptools.net
    5. Re:Southern England accents are impossible. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I've got a very "neutral" accent, which means that a lot of people seem to think I'm either English, or I have a public-school accent. A lot of people here think I went to a particularly posh school in Edinburgh (I didn't). I just come from a part of Scotland where people don't really have that strong an accent. Oh, and my mother used to be an english teacher, and has a bit of a "received pronunciation" (think BBC World Service) accent, but not much. That may affect things a bit.

  67. What are they reconsidering? by l4m3z0r · · Score: 1
    I'm sure they expected a drop in approval after putting the help calls in the hands of people who have engrish as a second language. Most people aren't honestly going to do anything about it. The approval ratings drop but it is unlikely we will see a mass migration to another computer provider. I bet the number of people who take the quality of support into buying a computer(or anything else for that matter) is insignifigant. This obviously only applies to home users, as a IT professional you damn well better take quality of support into it because thats your job.

    For me, it has little affect because I build my own machines or buy apple(support with apple is IMO absolutely amazing).

    The worst part of all this however is the way I get treated when I did have to talk to the dell people. They acted as though it was my fault that I couldn't understand the accent and mumbling over the ambient noise in the background. Also they just downright refused to listen when I was telling them I had already tried some of the procedures before.(apple generally believes you but asks that you do it again with a meaningless twist. this accomplishes both assuring to the tech that you have tried it without affending a tech savy user).

  68. Obligatory PA quote by Glamdrlng · · Score: 2, Funny
    Case in point: A friend of mine bought a VAIO, which never really worked. After the third repair attempt he got it back with a hole in the case, requiring a nasty letter from his lawyer until they finally reimbursed him. That was after accusing him of breaking it himself.
    Sorry but I have to...

    Piro: "I see the RAID controller got 'the screwdriver'."

    Largo: "It was not l33t. It deserved d34th."
    --

    Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
  69. Snap for Apple UK by mccalli · · Score: 1
    ...they shipped the return box to an old address. This was after THEY confirmed my address was correct... I corrected them, and they shipped another box. Where'd it go? You guessed, to the wrong address AGAIN...All in all, I probably spent between 3 and 4 hours on the phone, and had a laptop I couldn't fully use for about a month

    Yep, snap for Apple UK. I had one warranty and one paid-for repair to be done. They shipped the box to not just an old address, but an old home address when I'd specified them to ship to my work. They then wanted me to go and find where they'd sent the box to - nope, won't do that. Another box sent to the right address please.

    Second box came, and after a few days my machine was returned to me. Not bad? Well, no. Only the warranty repair had been done. My paid-for repair had been ignored. More phone calls - apparently, my credit card details were tied in with the original lost box number, and hadn't been transferred to the second box. Hence the people actually doing the repairs had no knowledge they were supposed to carry out a paid-for repair.

    Machine goes back again (this is a 12" Powerbook, by the way). Promised return in ten days. Nothing. Rang - it had been shipped that day, and I should expect a delivery. Of course, nothing turned up. A further week of calls took place before I found out that they'd still been trying to deliver the thing to my old home address, despite me ensuring on the phone that they were going to deliver it to a work address. It was eventually escalatedto the Dispatch Manager before the problem was sorted.

    Total time: about five weeks. Actual repairs required? A snapped-off key and a new base to replace a dented one following a fall.

    Not impressed.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  70. Some examples here too. by Skiron · · Score: 1
  71. tech support vs. tech support by Moonlapse · · Score: 1

    I work as tech support for some homebrewed software suites. More often , when another company calls for support on the product, im talking to their support staff. More often now, their support is outsourced. Since we only work 7am-7pm , with these clients we have to hop on the phone at 7am to talk to them at 8pm India time. This doesn't leave the biggest window of time to solve problems, on top of the language barrier. I've been on conference calls with a few of their support people, and one of them was almost the designated translator, with the others English so garbled and fast no one in the States could understand. Anyway, I can perfectly understand how outsourcing support can be frustrating for the caller, especially when its burning a hole in your wallet.

    --
    - I got my free iPod and a free Nintendo DS....why not
  72. Re:There is still one company offering great suppo by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've called Apple tech support on three occasions and always had an extremely knowledgable...

    Not to seem trollish but Apple also has a few advantages:

    1. Less software means that there is less chances for a third party to screw over the PC.

    2. Less virii/adware means less problems to contend with as well as a greater chance of a non-fouled system

    3. Most of Apples hardware is from Apple. This also means not having to contend with third party problems

    4. Most Apple owners seem to have a very specific use for the PC when they buy it. Joe Sixpack buys an E-Machine because it's cheap and it runs the best-known OS. Joe Sixpack is less likely to have as much experience as the Apple user. I doubt many people by an Apple as a first PC because most people either don't know what they want/need or they just want a general PC.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  73. Cost by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Informative

    To some extent I have to say - what do the eMachine-style budget PC users expect? They cost like $399 and come with more processing power, memory and hard disk space they could ever use. The savings have to come from somewhere.

  74. MOD PARENT UP by Progman3K · · Score: 1

    Useful advice

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by BrandXandY · · Score: 1

      Working in tech support myself, here are some tips that might actually be useful: Asking for the name and employee ID of a tech is a good way to make them resent you right off the bat. Thinking that this infomation will somehow be of use to you in the future baffles me... I'm not entirely sure what you think you can do with it. The other funny thing is the constant demands from irate customers who aren't getting a straight answer is to speak to supervisors or managers. They fail to realize that a manager or supervisor probably has less information on the topic than the front level agent you were speaking with. Their job is to run a call center, to make sure a certain number of calls are being handled, and that the agents are doing their jobs. The reason you're not getting a straight answer is because your OEM or ISP simply isn't providing the call center with that information, probably because they don't want to. Getting an employee's ID number or demanding to speak to a manager is just a waste of your time, and theirs, but customers do it all the time, even when I try to explain this to them.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      I completely disagree. I work in tech support, I do not mind giving my name, in fact I spell it out for them if need be. You as a TSR should realize that the customer is not always wrong as many TSRs like to think when they think they're right.

      Asking for a supervisor or manager is helpful because sometimes the TSR/CSR can't help you. Case in point. I placed an order for newegg.com, but the shipping address was different than the billing address. I wanted the shipping address to be the same as the billing address. I called and told them I'd like to change the shipping address (keep in mind this was before the order was shipped), and they told me they could not for security reasons. I tried everything with the CSR and she would not change it, and told me several times that if the package was sent but not received and sent back to newegg.com, I would be refunded and have to order again. I asked to speak with her supervisor. She put me on hold for a few minutes. A supervisor came back, I explained to him what I wanted, we had some arguing to do but he finally understood (apparently I wasn't making myself clear enough) that I wanted the shipping address to be the same as the billing address.

      As far as tantrums go, I don't believe in doing that, or screaming, yelling, cursing, etc. I can raise my voice a bit, and demand why they can't do etc, etc, but I don't do tantrums.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Thinking that this infomation will somehow be of use to you in the future baffles me... I'm not entirely sure what you think you can do with it.

      So you can tell whoever answers the phone on the third call from the same case: "Well, Mark ran that test from the CO, and Cindy re-ran it from the POP..."

      Every time, at the beginning the first call, I write down the name of whoever answers. Then, on each subsequent call in which I get a different tech, I recap whom I've spoken with, the current status, and if anybody on their company's end is working on something for this ticket.

      In small groups, they'll often know one another. If they have any questions about a previous procedure that I can't answer, they can talk to whoever performed it. Note that small groups doesn't necessarily mean small company; sometimes the groups are specialized by problem area, so I worked on a small group when I was with HP.

      I also use the tech's name during the conversation. "Well, Bob, I think I saw..." I'll also thank them by name at the end of each call. This is just a politeness thing, and I may forego it if the tech has a particularly formal manner (in which case they might consider it inappropriate for me to address them by their given name, and I feel awkward addressing people by surname).

      There are many reasons to know somebody's name when you're doing business with them, and many of them don't involve them complaining about you.

      They fail to realize that a manager or supervisor probably has less information on the topic than the front level agent you were speaking with.

      It depends. If they think you don't have the technical expertese to handle the task at hand, then yes, it makes no sense. They should ask you to escalate the call to the next tier.

      On the other hand, there's other reasons they may ask for a manager: they might feel that you are not reacting to the urgency of the problem; eg, their production floor is down and you say you'll consider the problem over lunch. They might feel that you are behaving incordially or unprofessionally. Or they may feel that additional resources from your company are needed, such as an on-site tech to coordinate with the call center tech. These are all reasonable and valid concerns.

      Many customers don't recognize the difference between the two escalation paths, possibly because they probably haven't worked in support. When they ask for a supervisor, they may really want to be escalated to a higher tech tier. I've always felt that tech support is as much about communication as it is technical work, and this is a common example. It may be useful to suggest technical escalation as an alternative, but be sure to phrase it so they don't feel that you're being dismissive (and yes, telling them that their request is useless sounds dismissive). I usually phrase the suggestion as a request for clarification: "Okay, would you like me to escalate to a higher-level technical representative, or would you prefer to speak with my business unit manager?"

      This communication issue brings us back to the point of offshoring call centers. Other cultures have very subtly different ways of structuring interactions, even when they speak the same language. A hesitation or change in vocal tone can have significant meaning in one culture (such as implying, "That line of troubleshooting is a waste of time"), but somebody from a different culture may miss it altogether.

  75. IT support, admin and helpdesks, Bill's legacy by alwynschoeman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every day I am amazed at the lack of skill and knowledge in IT personnel. 9 out of 10 of them should never have been a sys admin, programmer or support person.

    I think Microsoft is largely to blame. When people leaving school suddenly awakened to the fact that you don't just get handed a well paying job, Microsoft were pushing MSCE, etc. on the technically challenged masses.

    In the end only Microsoft gained. The masses eventually got paid less because of the laws of supply and demand, but still companies felt that they were bestowed with armies of skilled people certified 'smart' by Microsoft.

    Actually the armies of idiots might be the one thing that gives Microsoft staying power in companies. Migrate to Linux? Unless you re-hire your whole IT department you are in big troubles.
    At least your department will be much smaller.
    If you cannot even manage something you are certified for, what about something that actually requires a brain. Now make that idiot a manager and it becomes impossible.

    I must apologize for using 'idiot', its a relative thing. I am smart in technology, but an idiot when it comes to stuff like financial investment, legal matters, fixing cars, etc. See, no harm done.

    Now helpdesk personnel need to be patient. Thats where the Filipino's shine, pleasant and patient, but not very smart on the technical stuff no matter what they tell themselves.

    I guess its a catch 22, very few tech savvy people will work in a helpdesk. Maybe it will be the first true mass market for good AI?

    1. Re:IT support, admin and helpdesks, Bill's legacy by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      ai: what is it when a dell technician reads you a script they themselves cannot and refuse to deviate from? as for the rest of your commentary, you make blanket statements with no supporting facts; this makes you not smart in debating or supporting a statment hopefully these armies of idiots of which you speak so readily are prepared to listen ill prepared arguments about why they are useless, and why they should help you.

    2. Re:IT support, admin and helpdesks, Bill's legacy by Mitleid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How can you honestly say Microsoft is to blame for the sad state of the IT admin and tech support fields? It's not like Microsoft FORCED companies to accept their MSCEs; business owners and IT managers were the ones who figured it'd be a good idea to let a private company determine the education requirements for the IT employees. Micrsoft just rode the wave and laughed all the way to the bank.

      The state of "mainstream" IT in the U.S. seems to be more systematic than anything. Business owners and their advisors have gotten it into their head that "official" certifications are what qualifies one for a position, not actual technical knowledge. It functions the same way as the U.S. education system; some of the DUMBEST people I've known were straight A students, but I'm sure with an educational record as "impressive" as a college degree and even graduate school (*shudder*) they'll have no trouble at all finding a job or getting into college/graduate school. Colleges are just making a killing by riding on the blind faith business managers give to college degrees. So is Microsoft. Don't blame them; blame your boss(es).

      --

      --
      Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    3. Re:IT support, admin and helpdesks, Bill's legacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I just don't understand why companies are hiring people with certificates from vendors instead of people with computer science degrees from universities.

      I do software development, *NIX administration and Oracle development and administration for my company. I just don't understand how the MCSE net admins can do their jobs without knowing how to write simple programs and without basic computer knowledge that the C.S. grads have. As a result, the MCSE's typically have poor troubleshooting skills and as a result, a lot of the Windows servers on our network have constant problems and outages. It's nearly impossible for me to get them to remedy problems with DNS zones because they don't understand DNS, they only understand what buttons to click on their GUI to do the basics. What's worse is that management just accepts these problems as normal.

    4. Re:IT support, admin and helpdesks, Bill's legacy by benzapp · · Score: 1

      How do you propose to determine the technical skills of a potential employee?

      If a college degree doesn't matter, or a technical certification, then what? Do you plan to do week long interviews with every potential employee? Should everyone temp in the sink or swim world you envison?

      Criticize the current system if you must, but providing no alternative is the sign of immaturity. So you want to fight. Big fucking deal. What are you fighting for?

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    5. Re:IT support, admin and helpdesks, Bill's legacy by shahken · · Score: 1

      The state of "mainstream" IT in the U.S. seems to be more systematic than anything. Business owners and their advisors have gotten it into their head that "official" certifications are what qualifies one for a position, not actual technical knowledge.

      Are you trying to imply, my friend, that to get a certification, you don't need any "actual" technical knowledge? Don't you need a benchmark to judge certain things, like someone's technical knowledge - or a post's relevance on Slashdot?

      It functions the same way as the U.S. education system; some of the DUMBEST people I've known were straight A students

      That, I believe just means that the education grading system is not fool-proof, and considering someone "dumb" in one field won't strip them of their abilities in some other fields (maybe the ones they got their As in)

      Colleges are just making a killing by riding on the blind faith business managers give to college degrees.

      Again, benchmarking!! and I don't think I know of any bosses who hire just by looking at someone's resume - it just acts as a first pass. Personal interviews, and at times, aptitude tests follow.

      I guess I just want to make the point that formal education is not over-hyped. A person with a master's degree is by no means smarter than a person with a bachelor's degree and same level of experience - but he sure has had a chance to hone his skills in his chosen field a little more by solving more quasi-practical problems in class.

      I have worked as a web programmer and troubleshooter, rate myself as above average in basic technical/computer knowhow, and have had the "privilege" to help people with their computer problems.
      When I had to direct a guy to click on the "big blue E on the desktop" when he didn't understand what opening his web browser meant, I surely thought that someone sitting in India with a lot more patience and the willingness to work for less than what someone would expect to be paid here to go through all that torture was better for this job.
      At the same time, I have cussed at those so-called tech support staff twice - once when they won't believe that my router was really busted, and that I had tried not only the steps they suggested, but more than that (D-link), and the next time when he was asking me a thousand questions on why I wanted to cancel my aol account that came bundled with my new computer. (I know, I know, buying a D-link was a bad choice to begin with ;))

    6. Re:IT support, admin and helpdesks, Bill's legacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you need some curry to help with your bitterness about your Job Permformance Report Abib Calima?

      I fail to see supporting facts in your little statement either, guess that makes you not smart in debating or supporting a statement as well.

  76. Re:Ugly EARTHLINK! by BoRegardless · · Score: 2, Informative

    Had a similar Earthlink problem, & it WAS ELink's problem, and they LOST! Responses from the Hindu accented Tech Support: "We will have your DSL line reconnected in 5-7 days". "We will have your DSL line reconnected in 7-10 days". "We will have your DSL line reconnected in 28 days". "You wil have to contact your Phone Company". Their foreign TS crew is cluelesss on what to do, don't document it, and will plainly lie, just to get a customer off their back, and U.S. management doesn't have a clue as to what goes on. When I got mad and accused ELink TS of not knowing what to do and not being willing to give me to someone who could fix 'Their Problem' (how to keep their revenue stream coming in from me), there was silence. Technical incompetence is at the heart of Tech Service problems. It could be on the side of users, but I sure hear a lot of BS, in the very few times I call. The one place I do NOT get B.S. with Tech. Support on software is SolidWorks, but then I pay nearly $2000/yr for upgrades and phone support...out of Utah, in my case. So I cancelled my ELink service & asked to release the Elink hold on my Ph# and that resulted in "That will take 7-10 business days." which saved me $20/month. But, I had to cancel my existing phone # and get a new one, because Earthlink Tech Support couldn't execute for a customer that wants to leave their grasp. Earthlink is going to lose subscribers with the inept offshore Tech Suport. I doubt the Elink manager of TS has any clue of what is going on, as I doubt he shops his own system pretending to be a customer like me. JD Powers reports judging customer satisfaction in the first 60 days of owning a new car or an ISP service is a joke. Earthlink will also have no clue that I will no longer recommend them, which over time can have a large effect when "Word of Mouth" goes against you.

  77. Blame the stock market by DeprecatedFeature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Companies sell stock.
    Stockholders expect a healthy percentage return, better than the market average.
    Company must make large profit to return value to shareholders.
    Consumers demand cheap cheap cheap computers.
    Company does whatever it takes to show large profit while still selling computer for ridiculously low price, including sending all manufacturing and tech support and accounting and so on to low labor cost foreign country.
    Company upper management/shareholders rejoice at increased profitability.
    Everyone else suffers.

    The company I work for is in the process of relocating IT and accounting to a lower cost IT support center in Mexico (time zone restrictions prevented using India or Manila). Their stock is kicking butt because they've demonstrated all this efficiency and profitability. I have roughly 6 months before I know I'm out of a job. It's ugly, but that's how the whole thing works.
    Incidentally, incompetence is running amuck in plenty of US based IT shops, too, just because first line tech support is probably the lowest paid job in the house, and you sometimes get what you pay for.

    --
    maybe one day i'll be smart enough to come up with a cool sig, too.
  78. "Dude, you're getting a De..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think that you are getting tech support in the U.S. from a unnamed 'well known' computer company, think again. What most people don't know is that when they call that 800 number, their call gets routed to some of the call center firms here in SE Asia where a bunch of ex-pat Americans happily take their call as if they themselves were still in the country--but they're not. They're actually calling someone in a far east country, but given that most people who call tech support aren't the brightest of individuals, it's not surprising that they notice any difference... ...except, of course, when we call them a "fucking idiot" in another language. That's when they say "Huh?", and we say "Don't worry about them, sir! That was just one of our international tech support reps talking in the background. Ignore him. " :)

  79. Void to be filled by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

    It seems that all of the computer companies have outsourced tech support. So the expectation has been lowered for support calls. You can have a middle of the road tech support ranking if you outsource your support. There is no advantage to having support in the US becasue nobody else has support in the US.

    Would a fledgling computer company be able to boost sales and charge a premium by advertising its quality of service? Is this a competitive advantage, or will that company be wiped out by the low cost leaders? We cannot complain about support if we won't pay for it.

    I'm sure I am in the minority as I am "tech savvy", but I wonder about others who are not as adept with technical devices.

    That being said I don't think the QOS is any better in the US. You still have some idiot on the other end who has no clue about the product he is supporting. But I get what I paid for I guess.

    --
    I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
  80. I guess that's why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that http://www.scronline.com/ handles all of our own support and I've turned away over 20 offers for "off shoring" even though they can give me 24/7 support and do it cheaply, I think I'd rather have my customers understand the tech they are talking to. Besides, you don't need that much support when everything just.....tends to keep working.

    Sorry, had to put in a shameless plug for my company there :)

  81. Attitude, knowledge, language and poor phone conne by pcause · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really felt this article understaned how bad the situation has become. I'll describe my Dell "experience" below, but while this was for my home system, I also buy $500K+ per year for my company and am on a team that set policy for a $5 billion dollar company's purchases. Dell shouldn't assume that it is OK to send home users to India and keep corporate users in the US. many of us unimportant home users get to decide how oompany's spend their $$$.

    I called Dell technical support. I initially had a terrible connection. One assumes the IP telephone technology wasn't working well at that point. Even when I tried back and went through all the menus again, the volume was low. I had to ask 3 times to get the person to speak up.

    The next problem was that the people you get know very little. I'm a very expert computer user. The operator refused to listen to me when I described the problem and insisted on going through a checlkist of stuff about installing anti-virus, patches, etc. It was very aggrevating and they are not traied to recognize people who have expertise and not trivial problems.

    The person's attitude was one of uncertainty and confusion at each step. They literally disappeared for 3-5 minutes at each step. I assume this was to read a document and then ask someone else what it meant. Very annoying. When I tried to discuss things they clearly could only reread the script. When I asked if there was someone more expert they said we had to go through the steps first.

    I'm sure they were following procedure, but my problem was a hardware problem. I knew it and that was the issue that they agreed to after 30 minutes of wasting my time. I tried early in the call to just get to the hardware discussion, but had to give up and go through stupid questions and a variety of time wasting steps.

    Finally, there was the launguage / accent problem. The person's English was passable and the accent was heavy and made udnerstanding difficult at times.

    overall, I hated the experience. I will look for alternatives to Dell with US based support for my next purchases, including my $500K+ of corporate purchases.

  82. Ummmm... by FooDog · · Score: 1

    ...is this the point at which all of us just say

    "Well.....DUH!"

  83. Re:Automation? Make me laugh twice! by nwbvt · · Score: 1
    There are methods other than just touch tone menus. When I called Penske earlier this summer to see if I could rent a moving van, I was presented with an automated menu where you just spoke in your choice, much like you would do with a person.

    Add to that, a lot of tech support is moving to the Internet where you can input your choices using your mouse and keyboard (not everything can be done this way; I hate it when I call up Adelphia to complain that our cable internet service is down and they tell me about their website's customer service section).

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  84. The basic problem with tech support by Alioth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The basic problem - the reason why tech support in general (especially from a large company) is almost certain to suck whether it's in India, Wales, the United States or even Texas - is that people who are clueful don't want to do technical support.

    Tech support is generally a low-paid entry level job. Many people in tech support aren't there to make a career, they are there simply because they need some kind of job. (It always amused me when I was a teenager looking for entry-level jobs how it always said 'Why are you applying for a job at company X?' and you had to write some BS-filled 'go forward' corporate speak response on how the company is so wonderful, and how it'll be the start of a long career etc. when the genuine answer is simply 'because I need the money'.)

    Generally, the people in tech support will not have a clue and don't care to have a clue; they just want to collect their paycheck. Those with a clue would never do tech support even if you doubled their salary because the job is utterly stultifying.

    I have worked in a small call centre (12 positions). Fortunately, it *was not* tech support, but railway information. But even there we had the same problem: the job really demanded someone who knew geography well and had an interest in the railways, and the majority of people there just wanted a paycheck. Turnover was fast - it was rare that anyone stayed in the call centre for more than 6 months before leaving the company or finding a job somewhere else in the company. The trouble is there was quite a bit of knowledge you needed to do the job well thanks to the byzantine fare structure and the complex geography of the national railway network, and usually at 6 months the person was just getting competent and fast at doing the job - and they'd go and leave. I would imagine tech support isn't much different.

    1. Re:The basic problem with tech support by suso · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, that might be true once the dust has settled but I'm sure that this could not be said back in the mid-90s when a lot of us had a good deal of personal computer experience, but not enough to land us in a programming or sysadmin position. Back then the techsupport wasn't that bad, and it was before the days of the scripts that they go through now to fix your problem.

    2. Re:The basic problem with tech support by twifosp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are mostly correct. Tech support IS, for the most part, a crappy entry level job.

      Why? Because people refuse to pay for it and expect it for free.

      There are plenty of tiers to choose from from companies like Dell. You can get gold or platinum support, escalations on demand, all kinds of professional support.

      You just have to pay for it. But but but, it should be for freeeeeee! Well, no one ever complains that they didn't get free tech support when they go out and install a bunch of after market parts on their car. No one dreams of slapping new firmware [software] on their big screen TV to change the color programming.

      For some reason computers aren't considered appliances. And everything you can dream of doing, should be supported by the manufacture. Well that's pretty dillusional and short sighted on the customers part. No one expects these things with other appliances, why computers?

      I'm not saying tech support isn't bad. It is. Especially the consumer entry level portion. But there are options. I know for sure Dell offers quite a few support options for consumers. And tons more for the enterprise segment. If you pay for it, you can talk to the same american professional support staff every day. Hell, you can even outsource your own IT department and have Dell take care of everything. In todays age, you hook a computer up with a fresh install of windows XP to the internet and whammo, you're hit with a myriad of malicious software. Why is the computer company at fault for that again?

      It's a trade off. You get what you pay for in most cases. I still say Dell should beef up their entry level support to how it was 3-4 years ago. But you can't say it's all gone. They just charge you for it now.

    3. Re:The basic problem with tech support by HangingChad · · Score: 1
      The basic problem - the reason why tech support in general (especially from a large company) is almost certain to suck whether it's in India, Wales, the United States or even Texas - is that people who are clueful don't want to do technical support.

      Quite right. Makes me wonder if there's a market for premium ala carte tech support from very knowledgable users? If we can't figure out the solution you don't get charged. Sort of like dial-a-consultant for troubleshooting.

      If I wasn't in the business, I'd certainly use something like that. It would be worth the extra money to me just on the aggravation factor. Besides, when you're out on the road and you need help, you need it right now.

      Personally, I hope Hell never fixes their crappy support. One of the classes I teach is how to build your own PC. Ever since they shipped everything to India that class has been doing much better.

      Crap service is going to undermine their reputation.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    4. Re:The basic problem with tech support by FuzzyMan45 · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily a problem with things the user does or doesn't do that causes them to call tech support... Lets say you have a drive/motherboard/something vital fail. And lets say you have that part fail 2 weeks after you've recieved your shiny new computer. With a car, i'd expect your car dealer to replace whatever it was free of charge unless they deemed you caused the fuckup.

      With lots of support now, you have to _CONVINCE_ the tech that there is something actually wrong with your hardware. Even if you're tech savvy, and know what's wrong. You have to do some convincing.

      And, i can see where some tech support should be some of the user's responsibility. I totally agree with you, i do tech support for some of our net stuff, and do most of the programming. So yeah, all in all, i think i say i agree. Overall people need to pay some. but also they need to be smarter.

    5. Re:The basic problem with tech support by syberanarchy · · Score: 1

      Because computers are more complex and, with the exception of high-end HDTVs and stereo equipment, more complex than other devices.

      By their very nature, computers are meant to do "anything you can dream of doing." That's why it is a computer, instead of a TV, or a phone, or a stereo, etc. That's also why you can charge upwards of 1-2k for a really good one.

      If I pay 1000 dollars or more for a device, you're damn right I expect competent tech support as part of the deal! If I bought a 42 inch HDTV, and was told, upon calling tech, that "we can't help you because you changed the settings from factory default," I'd be pissed.

      But this is exactly what happened to me with Compaq, and this was AFTER they took my money because "my policy was up." So I paid for another year of support, only to be told by some turban wearing motherfucker on the other end that "we cannot support you, because you have changed the OS from windows 98 to XP. Thank you come again."

      Perhaps those shelling out 300 bucks for an e-machine get what they deserve. But when you go for the higher end models from HP and Dell and the like, you should at least be able to call up, and get solid answers.

    6. Re:The basic problem with tech support by syberanarchy · · Score: 1
      Because computers are more complex and, with the exception of high-end HDTVs and stereo equipment, more complex than other devices.

      Strike the second "complex," replace with expensive. Thx :)

    7. Re:The basic problem with tech support by Pasc · · Score: 1

      I fielded calls for Red Hat's installation support for three months back in '99 and it was pretty cool. We had only the most basic of call-scripts and we built our own FAQ database and internal irc-bot for most common questions. (I was the irc-bot admin.)

      Though I left after realizing that I wouldn't have any opportunity to move up because we only had Level 1 support in the city I lived (Rochester, NY). Anything escalated went to the RH main offices.

    8. Re:The basic problem with tech support by mephistus · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, you're dead right. However, there is one piece of the puzzle to add, tech companies don't want to do tech support either. They have to supply it though, or else no one will buy the product. There are plenty of ways that companies think of to get you to fix the problem yourself instead of ring up. Web based knowledge bases, help systems in the program and documentation on the product discs are resources usually available to customers, depending on the product.

      I currently work at a call center out of convenience. I had a good job doing Solaris administration, but didn't like the hustle and bustle of the big city. So I moved somewhere quieter and picked up a job at a call center until I get back to what I like to do. I do Tier 1 support, and it's a pretty interesting mix. Most people are here for the same reason I am, there are bills to pay. However there are finer distinctions in this group.

      The first group of tech support lackeys are those who have some sort of technical prowess and have a general interest in this type of work. This includes college kids taking class, kids out of high school looking to learn new things, or people like myself who would rather work IT fast food instead of real fast food while we hunt for real jobs. This group of people is unfortunately very small in general, but seemingly does a much larger share of the work more competently that our fellows.

      The other groups are much less note-worthy. There are people just getting into it fresh from their fly by night training/cert shack who believe the B.S. that their uber-l33t McMCSE will earn them the bling-bling, a benz, and J-Lo. These also tend to be the shortest lived group, partly due to the fact that they don't seem to teach proper critical analyzation and piecemeal troubleshooting and just do a bad job. The next are people coming from McJobs, where this tech support gig is better than burger flipping and they get to learn how to use a computer to boot.

      The simple fact is that tech support is crappy job. It doesn't pay enough to keep talented people, and if it's a busy call center, the burnout rate of talking to 35-50+ people every day is around 6 months. This makes live technical support a very expensive process to maintain. That's why many companies now charge for their support and only offer limited free support. Sure, you can bitch if you want, but 95% of what I'm going to tell you is available on the support website or in the manuals. So deal with it. It's a tax on laziness.

    9. Re:The basic problem with tech support by justins · · Score: 1
      Generally, the people in tech support will not have a clue and don't care to have a clue; they just want to collect their paycheck. Those with a clue would never do tech support even if you doubled their salary because the job is utterly stultifying.

      On the contrary, increasing the salary would bring better people into the role. It's pretty much the only way to do that.

      The trouble is there was quite a bit of knowledge you needed to do the job well thanks to the byzantine fare structure and the complex geography of the national railway network, and usually at 6 months the person was just getting competent and fast at doing the job - and they'd go and leave.

      I wonder how many of those people could be persuaded to stay if they were offerred a serious increase in salary after demonstrating some aptitude. I'm guessing quite a few. People will put up with some tedium or stress for money.

      Unfortunately, paying customer service and support people well seems to be against the religion of 95% of the MBAs in the world. Go figure.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  85. Should provide a good break for smaller businesses by suso · · Score: 1

    This will probably turn out to be a good thing for smaller businesses that keep their tech support in house and have a more personable feel to their support.

    As consumers get more and more frustrated with not getting the support that they have come to expect, they will take their money elsewhere and that else where will be to smaller more local businesses.

  86. Me too. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I've had bad experience with Sony laptops, too, and a wacky response to requests for repair.

  87. Re:There is still one company offering great suppo by nordicfrost · · Score: 1
    And the main reason for the good Apple support is that Jobs yelled "our support sucks!" in the face of the Support systems VP. He responed with a plan to fix the support over three months, whereas Jobs instantly breated him by telling that it should not take more than one day to fix his crappy support system.

    I'v had a couple of run-ins with Apple support, and they are truly stellar compared to Dell and angelic to Tele2. Ibm also har a very smooth operation in their support systems.

  88. Dell? Are you listening? by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dell sells clones. They aren't truly any better than any other PC out there. They make some pretty nice cases though.

    That said, the ONE thing that made Dell better than the rest was their support. It did't take long before they realized that it was a BAD BUSINESS DECISION to move their corporate support overseas. They moved it back to the U.S. pretty quickly when companies started dumping Dell.

    That said, it proves they are aware of the problems it causes -- this is not a surprise to them in the least. The message I get from that fast? They prefer to abuse their users when they think they can get away with it. If you're not a corporate user, they don't care about you. Simple right? They might try to deny it, but their actions speak the loudest.

  89. Re:Automation? Make me laugh twice! by mikael · · Score: 1

    Touch tone systems are gradually being replaced by voice recognition systems, so the maze of twisty little menus will disappear. Several of the companies that I use (banks, cable company) are already doing this.

    At the beginning of the last century, as the telephone was becoming commonplace in every home, the telco's would have eventually faced a shortage of workers (unmarried women) to work as telephone operators. If telephone switching networks hadn't been automated, the demand for operators to switch connections would have exceeded the total world birthrate for the female of the species.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  90. People will pay more to take a dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sad to say if you're PC is beroke it means you cant do any work 'till it's fixed. If your plumbing is broke you cant take a dump 'till it's fixed.

    People will always pay more to be able to take a dump when they need one than get their PC fixed.

  91. Re:Automation? Make me laugh twice! by swb · · Score: 1

    When I called Penske earlier this summer to see if I could rent a moving van, I was presented with an automated menu where you just spoke in your choice, much like you would do with a person.

    Ugh, those are the worst. The menu system interrupts you or keeps talking, since its voice-response system isn't as intelligent as a person's, plus they're not intelligent enough to have several logical permutations of the menu options.

  92. To clarify by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1
    I think that question has been pretty well answered, but I'll give a practical example.

    I depressingly frequently get an email from some twit with no decent excuse (ESL, etc) that reads like this:


    i am having this problem with my email adn it doest work please help me i need ti onw ... i installed cyurs but it wont let me loggin ... im new to linux im using gentoo and the cbs version of cirrus hepl pls


    When I get something like that and am feeling irritable or they're being unreasonable ("FIX IT NOW!" when asking for free support on a mailing list, etc), I tend to reply with the original text quoted and FIXED, like this:


    [I] am having [a] problem with my email[. It] [doesn't] work[,] please help me[. I] need [it now. I] installed [Cyrus] but it won[']t let me [log in. I'm] new to linux [I']m using [G]entoo and the [CVS] version of [Cyrus, help please.]


    The point here, which sadly probably goes "whoosh" over the heads of most recipients, is that email is not a license to attempt to best the next guy in the illiteracy competition, nor an excuse not to bother to fix typos. My time is important too, especially when they're not paying me for the use of it.

    I only tend to do this to people who really need to be beaten with the "here's the shift key - use it" bat, among several hundred others.

    There is a shift key. Use it. No! Not the caps lock key, the shift key.

    The full stop key does not have to be hit three
    times in succesion, not should it be most of the time.

    Three full stops do not equal one comma.

    A message should almost always contain more than one sentence.

    The enter key is important. I promise.

    You have a backspace key for a reason (oh - it's the one with the left-pointing arrow near the top right). Along with the fact that your computer displays what you type, it lets you fix typographical errors. This opportunity should not be ignored. If you insist on using your computer like a broken keyboard that's not connected to anything, I'll be happy to provide you with a real one.


    Frustrated?

    Just a little.
    1. Re:To clarify by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      Yeah. How much effort does it take to type "please" instead of "pls"? It's THREE EXTRA LETTERS! You're sending an email, not an SMS - there's no character length limit.

      It does seem to be management types who do it - I wonder if it's intended to convey a sense of "I'm so important and busy that I don't have TIME to type those three extra letters or reach for the Shift key"?

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  93. Free Markets -vs- Capitalism by ahfoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The idea of a "Free Market" and the economic system called Capitalism are not one and the same thing.
    The United States of America is historically thought of as a having a Capitalist economy with equity markets playing a central position in its economy. But Capitalism, with its implication of a central role for equity markets, is much older than the US and is often thought to have emerged in its modern form in the city-state of Venice in the fifteenth century. The word "bourse" is a French coinage that refers to what Americans call a stock market.
    On the other hand, this phrase "Free Market" is little more than an idealistic slogan. It's not too far removed from the term "socialism" in the sense that both merely refer to a general tendency that is never really expected to exist in the absolute sense and would require vastly different societies than the ones we have today even to begin to approach.
    I just want to remind everyone of this fact because when someone starts a thread with the phrase "Free Market Capitalism" it really just leads to a lot of misunderstandings. It's not unlike the ETS writing question that asks students to give their opinion on whether artists or engineers contribute more to society. This is a misleading question because the disctinctions upon which the topic are premised are false.

  94. Australian by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    That's really Australian - I'm pretty sure anyway. I live in Australia but grew up in New Zealand. The full traditional text would be:

    "She'll be right, mate".

    More New-Zealand-ish (at least in the semi-rural Northland where I grew up) is the inclination to postfix everything with "eh, kuz?"

    Talking to my brother, who lives in Dunedin (South island of NZ) is an interesting and new experience every time ;-)

  95. Take Note: by Bigman · · Score: 1
    IBM prefers the reception it gets at home. Big Blue is consolidating its support operations in Atlanta. "We believe the right skills to do the job and meet customer requirements were best found here in the States," says Tom Conway, director of service for IBM Global services.
    Another good reason that us Geeks should be cheering for IBM these days.
    OK They're not philanthropists and no doubt the accountants hold as much sway there as anywhere else, but they do seem to be thinking a bit further ahead than tomorrows bottom line, unlike many other companies I could mention.
    --
    *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
  96. Just another excuse to export US jobs by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    That's what it sounds like to me: "Gosh, we hate to export US jobs, but we have to because of the language barrier. As you can see, our phoney statistic thingy has gone from 7.0 to 6.3. Clearly, we really have no choice. Also, although we never hire BSCSs, we have noticed an alarming drop in number of students graduating with a BSCS - the govenment must allow more H1Bs, there is just no other choice. If these alarming trends don't change, IT staff will start demanding more than minimum wage, and that would hurt everybody."

    1. Re:Just another excuse to export US jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      uh...actually the article is pointing out the shortcomings of using offshore labor that can create a language barrier. sort of the opposite of what you posted.

    2. Re:Just another excuse to export US jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gosh, we hate to export US jobs, but we have to because of the language barrier.

      Read this again... does it still make sense to you?

  97. Re:Automation? Make me laugh twice! by nwbvt · · Score: 1

    No, they are not perfect, but they will improve in time as voice recognition technology gets better. This one was actually not that bad, so the technology is getting better.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  98. Dont blame the Indians by BobRooney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just because you can't understand someone on tech support doesn't necessarily mean they are an Indian, or other foreign-based call center. There are plenty of American Citizens with poor command of the English Language. I have had several people call me for various telemarketing reasons who could hardly read their script. I promptly laughed at them and hung up, but their accent was clearly an American one.

    The problem has nothing to do with where call centers are located but rather who's doing the work on the phone with you. All good support personnel should be trained in "standard" American English to help avoid ambiguity, since everyone can understand the version of English you hear on the CNN or other standard media outlets, even if you dont' normally speak that way.

    I myself work with customers on the phone and make a point of suppressing my slight New York accent and not using any slang that might not be clear.

    It's difficult enough trying to bridge the gap between technical and non-technical people without a 2-way language barrier getting in the way. A support rep should be able to decipher people's accents, within reason and should be trained in speaking a relatively standard form of the language they are providing support in.

    This doesn't just apply to English, but also Spanish. We have support rep where I work who is responsible for helping spanish speaking customers. When on the phone with a customer she speaks "standard" spanish that you would usually hear on Telemundo or Univision. There is a definite difference between the dialect she speaks on the phone and what she uses when she's on the phone with her husband for example.

    1. Re:Dont blame the Indians by objekt404 · · Score: 1

      However there *is* a valid reason to use the appropriate accent from a customer service stand point. Should I get a customer that is *obviously* a Southern native, I deliberatly slip into my FL cracker drawl as it seems to calm the customer & break their trepidation. I'm no longer 'someone on the phone', but a neighbor who is interested in helping them.

      Too bad most of the time my customers are transplants from up North. With these customers I immediately have to speak proper, clear, non-accented American (if only b/c of the belief that a Southern drawl=stupid). ... & then there are the Spanish speaking customers who call in b/c we somewhere offer bilingual support (cunning separated from our mention of 24/7 support in literature). Sorry Jose, supanigo hanshimasen.

      --
      "Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun."
  99. NEC Japan Support Rocks by charlieafrid · · Score: 1

    Well, I took an old NEC Nopebook to NEC office the other day since their main tech support office was in Akihabara, Tokyo and I happen to work there. Its been out of warranty for over two years. They asked me to leave the machine for checkup. The notebook wouldnt power up due to a looooose power jack on the motherboard. After their initial checkup after a couple days, they called me and told me that this power jack Part of the motherboard is covered by a permanent NEC warranty and they will replace it for free. After a couple more days, they shipped the computer back to me at their cost with everything back to normal and fixed. I was really shocked to see this kind of attitude from NEC since they are notorious for charging too much for everything. This fix reeeeally changed my perception of NEC support....though I still hate them for their charges to common pc users on normal computer problems...like Yen 40,000 for a 30 GB hard drive replacement etc....

  100. SUN Microsystems a good example by mc2104dave · · Score: 1

    I agree with this article. I continuously have to submit support calls to Sun Microsystem around JES (a topic of another good discussion). I encounter bugs, and issues, where I have to log a support call. 95 % of the time, I get someone outside the country. I find that I have to spend MUCH more time: A:) repeating myself, B:) restating the problem, C:) going into much more detail then usual to get a clear focus on the outstanding issue. D:) getting the tech to repeat/restate what he's saying so I can understand what he's saying.
    I prefer to talk to someone on the phone, as I find you can usually do much better troubleshooting, and resolve issues much quicker, then by email. But 95 % of the time, I usually insist email-only conversations, because these techs are too difficult to understand. Besides, they are just working on a script, NEVER can they immediately suggest a solution or workaround for even small issues, it's always "I'll have to bring this to the attention of my backline engineer" (Which means, "I have no idea what your talking about, let me find someone I hope can...")This exercise is at LEAST a 12-24hr turn-around.
    It drives me crazy. I strongly believe that outsourcing to India severely impacts "time-to-resolution" calls. I'd say any issue I open up now, I forecast a minimum of 7 days for resolution.

  101. Not Just Computers by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    Heh, we're having trouble at work. I work in a bowling alley. It's less than a year old, and was constructed at a cost of like $5 million, much of it being spent on the bowling equipment.

    The mechanics are having some trouble, and keep calling tech support. We get a much higher level of service than you might if you buy a CD-ROM drive; we've had their techs fly out several times as part of our service.

    But we rarely get anyone good on the phone. Last time someone called, they got really ambiguous directions on what to do. Our mechanic asked him to clarify what he meant. He couldn't, because he was just reading out of a book, and really had no idea what he was talking about.

    I think the whole tech support approach is flawed. The 'first level' techs should know the basic problems by heart, and not have to use a book. And if they need the book, I'd rather be passed up a level, rather than read to.

    Maybe they wouldn't make money, but I'd rather pay a little more for a quality product, knowing that some of the money was going to ensure that tech support knew what they were talking about.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    1. Re:Not Just Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually run a tech support department, and here's the whole problem: My boss told me "A call center is only as good as their script" to which I responded "no, a call center is only as good as the people answering the phones."

      There's a CompUSA near here, there are two young nerds that work there who really know their stuff. I would love to offer them a job, hell I could double their $8.00/hr CompUSA wage and offer them full benefits. But everytime I have an opening, due to layoffs in other sections of our huge company I'm forced to take an internal candidate. The last 2 know nothing about PCs, probably don't even touch one when they leave here, and really have no interest in learning about them. Never mind the fact that they the deductive reasoning skills required to be an effective troubleshooter.

      I think the "call center is only as good as the script" is a prevalent point of view in a lot of corporations. Let's see you get your damn script to answer the phone for you.

      I posted as AC because I've already modded this thread.

      --If 50,000 people say a stupid thing, it's still a stupid thing.

  102. Why don't they move Helpdesks to the SE US? by hartba · · Score: 1

    The southeast US is one of the cheapest parts of the country to live and do business in. Atlanta excluded. Wages are low because the cost of living is cheaper here. I know there are a few call centers already in the SE but I don't know why they haven't looked at this area of the country more. It seems to me paying slightly extra for native english speakers who could effectively help someone would pay off more than shipping the jobs overseas.
    Ok, please refrain from the redneck jokes.

    --
    60 percent of the time, my comments are right everytime.
    1. Re:Why don't they move Helpdesks to the SE US? by phuturephunk · · Score: 1

      They actually used to place them in Central Florida and places like Kentucky and Tennessee during the 90's (I cut my teeth in a call center in Central Florida), but even with those economies taken into account, the cost pressure still made them move it off shore.

    2. Re:Why don't they move Helpdesks to the SE US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally find it easier to understand someone with an Indian accent than I do someone with a strong Southern accent.

  103. I called hell not too long ago myself. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Funny story.

    I inherited an "hINSPERON" laptop, and during the course of use ran across an odd LED error code. Found nothing about it online, had nothing better to do, so, what the hell, I called hell.

    I have called hell many times in the past, but this was one of the longest waits I've ever had, raising the question of where all this money they're saving is going. Finally I get through to a support rep with an indian accent that was understandable, at least to me.

    However, clearly she did not understand anything I was saying. I needed one piece of information, very specific (Middle LED Orange-Orange-Green repeating), which SHOULD have been available on their website. I asked the question, she put me on hold for ten minutes, came back and said, "It's not important".

    "Maybe not," sez I, "but I still want to know."

    Ten more minutes. "It's not important"

    "Yes, you said that, and I said I still want to know."

    Ten more minutes. "You don't need to know."

    I DO need to know, to justify the last two hours of my life!"

    Ten more minutes. "It's a battery code."

    "No, really? The little battery ideogram next to the LED would never have given me that impression. what does it MEAN?"

    Five more minutes, then I hung up. I've had many bad experiences with hell, but that was the worst in terms of sheer pointlessness.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  104. ObCitySlickers by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...should I just be grateful it's not a dupe?

    Day ain't over yet.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  105. Read Life 2.0 for some insight and ideas by NotClever · · Score: 1
    I'm just about done with Rich Karlgaard's Life 2.0. It would seem to be very appropriate for your situation (and that of many others as well).

    --
    Hell, there are no rules here. We're trying to accomplish something. - Thomas Edison
  106. Partly customer's own fault? by tehanu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I keep on hearing about how *insert big computer company*'s customer support is crap, but this doesn't seem to be affecting their profits any. Does bad customer support really affect the bysiness they get? If say Dell's customer support is crap, don't the customers just whine until their nearest geek friend/relative do the work for them free? The average buyer of computers relies on price and big numbers on the box (the MHz myth) and the ooh-shiny factor in terms of making purchasing decisions. Customer support is hardly ever considered (ditto with things like security for software purchases...). If the consumers don't care, why should the companies? If consumers want good customer support they should be willing to pay for it by making it part of their purchasing decisions eg. two identical systems from two computers, one with good customer support, one with not-so-good but the other one is cheaper, the vast majority of people will go for the cheaper one.

    If customers don't vote with their wallets then why should Dell/Sony/HP et al. care about good customer support (from the POV of a business)? The idea of good customer support is to build loyalty but the average computer buyer doesn't consider support important at all when buying stuff as they will just get their nearest geek to fix it for them and they don't want to pay the extra money for good support as they want it as cheap as possible. Then from a financial POV to the business, it's just an annoying expense they have to have that doesn't add anything to the bottom line (since customers don't seem to be deserting them in droves or making purchasing decisions based on customer support reputation) and so it makes sense (from a financial POV) to do it as cheaply as possible even if it is crap.

  107. attitude towards foreign accent by demiurg · · Score: 1

    It has nothing to do with support level, it's the american attitude towards a person speaking with foreign accent.

  108. local companies by arisl · · Score: 1

    I have actually started to use a local company in the city where I live for my personal computing needs.

    I get local support, faster response, and it is very easy to get an appointment to bring in one of my computers for service.

    The last computer I owned that was from one of the big companies with overseas support, is no longer used. I had quite a few issues with this computer, and got tired of waiting on the phone for hours, just to get my message through. One thing is the language barriere, the other concern is the time it takes to make an appointment for service.

    I probably paid a little more when I bought my computers from the local store, but the service and follow up is a lot better, and it saves me money and frustration in the long run by having a personalized relationship with a local company.

    --
    -- Arild
  109. Just A Natural Consequence by blueZhift · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The language and accent related issues are really just a natural consequence of offshoring. In the beginning most of the people working the call centers in India (for example) were probably among the best educated there. As demand grew, more call centers were opened and more people in India heard that this was a good way to make some money. Well, the proportion of well educated and talented people in India is probably no different than in the U.S., so it was inevitable that many of the people working in the call centers now are not among the best educated and most talented. Not that they're morons, just average folk. I mean really, how many of us could communicate fluently in a foreign language? I could communicate very very badly in two or three others. With a predetermined script I could do better, but that's about it. And forget about casual conversation!

    While companies could try to better train their workers, I think that with respect to foreign language skills a limit is being reached. That is, even if the person in the call center understands English perfectly, they may still have an accent when speaking it that a U.S. customer will have a hard time with. I personally like accents, but Indian accented English is one of the most difficult for me to understand. I usually have to know the person for a while to fully understand what they are saying. Unfortunately, an already upset customer in the U.S. is not likely to have the patience for that.

    1. Re:Just A Natural Consequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >In the beginning most of the people working the >call centers in India (for example) were >probably among the best educated there.

      Im in India and I can tell you that this is not the case. A call center job is not exactly viewed as a career here and hence does not really attract the best talent. It mostly attracts people who want to do it part-time to make a quick buck. But the education level is somewhat high in this segment because a lot of college students do it part time.

      >I mean really, how many of us could communicate >fluently in a foreign language? I could >communicate very very badly in two or three >others.

      There's a difference here. English is not really a foreign language in India. India was a British colony for 300 years and that left English as one of the official languages of India. Most of India's education system uses English as the medium of instruction.
      In fact in kindergarten school, I learnt to write the English alphabet before I learnt the written alphabet of my own mother tongue !!
      But its just that the accepted English accent in India is somewhat different than in the US. If I tried imitating the US accent in India, people will laugh at me and kick my ass. So thats why everyone here speaks English with an "Indian accent".

  110. the truth by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

    No one values the tech support enough so no one pays enough and those techs who are good get frustrated when the 'manager'(read person who sucked up to a superior) harasses to them about call logs/volume.

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    1. Re:the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the problem. They focus on customer satisfaction (good idea) but ignore job satisfaction (bad idea). They have all these metrics to go by that prevents a tech from solving a problem properly since if they are over on a metric, they could be fired.

  111. Devils Advocate... by infra-red · · Score: 1

    I've seen a few times when telneting to port 25 does fail and its not the ISP's fault.

    Spyware, Viruses, and my favorite anti-virus software.

    The problem as I see it is that 99% of the user problems are the same. I almost think that working in a factory would give you more satisfaction then working in a Call centre doing support. So, those who have real technical skill will get out of doing support, and those who don't won't.

    1. Re:Devils Advocate... by nuggz · · Score: 1

      How do viruses spyware and anti virus software block port 25 on the server?

    2. Re:Devils Advocate... by infra-red · · Score: 1

      A quick google search of Norton Antivirus 25 returns results like this one

      I suppose I made a relatively grand generalization, but basically, any software that intercepts the traffic on port 25 could break port 25. I have specifically seen it happen with AV. I've suspected ith with Spyware and Viruses, but I tend to just clean machines up if I find them like that instead of seeing if that is the cause.

    3. Re:Devils Advocate... by nuggz · · Score: 1

      I don't run any of that crap on my computer.
      I know I'm not blocking my own outgoing connections.

    4. Re:Devils Advocate... by infra-red · · Score: 1

      The point wasn't what you were running on your computer, its that from the ISP's perspective, some customers are running that type of software.

      The fundamental problem is that you end up trying to deal with the lowest common denominator. Its also what causes the most frustration when someone who has a clue calls in, because they are being treated the same way.

  112. English better for college labs, tech support by Myrrh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember back in college when you had a TA -- or worse, a prof -- who could barely speak English, trying to teach you a subject you barely understood anyway? Remember how frustrating it was to have to simultaneously learn some extremely difficult subject and learn what sounded like something halfway between English and some other language?

    Well, lo and behold, computer companies are finally realizing that it's hard for people who may or may not be good at computers, to receive Tech support from someone who barely speaks English.

    You'd think that fall into the realm of common sense, but then again, most universities don't care that their TA's hardly speak English, so why should computer companies care? /bitter

  113. Our Tech support is local-ha ha ha by Sethseekstruth · · Score: 1

    Yes, I am a sales person, and was trying to get a customer to consider giving us business, and was asking a CEO some technical questions. He didn't know the answer, so he decided to call tech support to get the info. After going into a voice mail maze, he finally got some English as a Second Language guy from who knows where, whome he could not understaqnd at all. I told him our tech support call center was located about a 45 minute drive from where we were sitting, and closed him on the spot.

    --
    http://www.geocities.com/sethseekstruth/great_outd oors.html
  114. Reps not always to blame by plastid · · Score: 1

    It's not always the reps fault that service sucks.

    There's a tech support call center a few blocks from my apartment here in Ontario, Canada (looks like jobs aren't only being outsourced to Asia). Though I could really use the experience and the money, I have been informed that anyone with above-average computer knowledge is inelligible. HR wants each support rep to read a script, not think for themselves. Thus if you have any problem not on a sheet in front of the rep, they're going to have no idea how to help you.

    1. Re:Reps not always to blame by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      I've never understood this "overqualified" business myself...

      A number of years ago when I was younger and looking for work I tried Future Shop, a Canadian version of Circuit City, and was told I was overqualified to sell computers.

      Overqualified?! How the heck can someone be overqualified to sell a COMPUTER? Well, I was informed that I would try too hard to give the customer what they WANTED, and I wouldn't give them what the /store/ wanted... which would be the "deal of the week" and such.

      So, next time you're in a place like Future Shop and you wonder just why the sales people don't seem to have a clue... it's because the smart ones aren't hired... they might actually sell you what you want instead of whatever "deal" the chain got that week. :(

  115. I work both sides of the issue.... by AetherBurner · · Score: 1

    This issue applies to way beyond the computer support issue. IMHO, the operational technologies that this society are using are experiencing exponential rates of increasing abilities and intelligence demands to operate and maintain effectively. When you mix this with the declining or stagnant knowledge base present in the users of the equipment at hand and the increasing use of "script kiddies" who suffer from the same issue (tech support centers staffed with low-cost script readers and people found at bargain basement prices just to read books and CAN'T INDEPENDENTLY THINK), this issue just magnifies. People and companies are unwilling to pay for well-trained and knowlegable people because their abilities can and will command a high wage and companies only worry about profit. I do not see this issue going away any time soon and will just get worse. I work as a support engineer and the vast majority of the people I have to work with I wouldn't trust plugging a lamp into a wall socket because they are of the mindset to put their tongue across the wallsocket to see if it is powered or not. It appears that as long as companies are not willing to pay the $$$$$ necessary to get competent, thinking support personnel and the users of the equipement are not willing to learn to maintain and operate the equipment they purchase, this issue will just keep inflaming. Where is the "X on the wall" when I need it!!!!

  116. Tech Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a call center tech. Those who do it for the most part are there (like most have stated) to collect the $$$$. I am there to help people. That is my nature. I get up each morning and look forward to being the one who takes care of the issue(s). I love it so much it makes most of my co-workers sick. I work for one of the biggest companies (one that is mentioned in the article), and yes I too have a problem with our over-seas "friends". Not in just that they are clueless, but that most of what they do just munges the system's more. So what do I do? I take ownership of damn near every call I get (but stress to customer that if they have a different problem they need to call back in and speak to another tech) and take care of that customer till the problem is fixed regardless of how long it takes. Do I get annoyed? Like you don't know, but I love my job, love the company I work for and NEVER take anything that is said personally. If a customer is transfered to me , I do what I can for them. Most of you who are bitching have to realize that there is only one of me and I can't do it all. Those who call in and get me are so pleased that it warms my heart, and confirms why I do this job. For the people. Ohh BTW I used to own my own IT firm and gave it up to do this.

  117. Hold My Hand (id10t errors) by Ranger · · Score: 1

    The problem with tech support is that so many end users are ignorant and afraid of the software/hardware they are using. And they DON'T really want to learn it. Especially when the software is slow, poorly written, and has a poor user interface.

    So end users want someone to hold their hand Step-by-Step (sometimes baby steps) This is very time consuming and frustrating. You both may be speaking the same language. You may have even gone to the same high school together, but that doesn't mean you'll understand each other.

    For example: You wouldn't believe how many people don't know where the # key is on their cell phones when you call it the 'pound' key (technically it's called an octothorpe key, so you'll tell them it's below the 9 or it looks like a tic-tac-toe symbol) nor do they know what power-cycle means.

    Heaven forbid you use any acronyms like PCMCIA (People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms).

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Hold My Hand (id10t errors) by saiha · · Score: 1
      The problem with tech support is that so many end users are ignorant and afraid of the software/hardware they are using. And they DON'T really want to learn it. Especially when the software is slow, poorly written, and has a poor user interface.
      So you think they should be excited to learn this slow, poorly written, software with a poor user interface? Why should you care if they don't want to learn how to do an IT job along with their own job? Are you (an IT person) willing to learn their job when they call so that you can use terms familier to them?

      What we can do as computer people is help get the people we are around up to speed on computers. Does at least on of your immediate family know how to take apart a computer and upgrade it? With enough knowlege so if they get stuck you can easily guide them through it?

      I know that when I first was into computers I would do _everything_ for them, and too quickly for them to follow. Then after getting incredibly frustrated at having to do every little thing I would let them do it. I guided them while letting them figure things out, limiting my responses to yes/no if I had already explained it. This method seemeed to work well enough that they learned the basic terms and workings of the computer.

    2. Re:Hold My Hand (id10t errors) by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      So end users want someone to hold their hand Step-by-Step (sometimes baby steps)

      I once started a restore procedure for a guy which would format his hard drive, and restore it to the factory software packages. I told him it would take an hour or two, then reboot, and everything would be fine. He asked if I could stay on the line for that time. I politely told him that I couldn't but that everything would work out. He kept getting more and more insistant that I stay on the line. I asked him why, and he replied "I'm kinda scared to be alone with this computer." I asked him why he was scared to be alone with it. He responded "It... it... it's been doing strange things on me lately."

      For example: You wouldn't believe how many people don't know where the # key is

      Or how many people don't know where their "enter" key is. I can't tell you how many times I told people "Press the ENTER key on your keyboard." When they'd say "I don't see the enter key", I'd say "It's on your keyboard." They'd respond "I don't see the enter button on my screen." "No, it's NOT ON YOUR SCREEN! THE ENTER KEY IS ON YOUR KEYBOARD!!!!!!"

      you'll tell them it's below the 9 or it looks like a tic-tac-toe symbol)

      How do you get a computer-illiterate woman to find the CPU heat sink every time? Tell them to look for the hair brush. I mean it. I never had it fail.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  118. Life experiences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " So, you were being overpaid for your job when the market stabilised and re-adjusted itself, leaving you with a smaller wage which means you're not as well off as you were before."

    You know I wonder what they don't teach in schools these days? Here's something for you to chew on Dave. You're overpaid for your job. You'll be getting a "market adjustment" tomorrow. Here's what you need to do for the rest of the day. Justify to your boss why he should keep you at your present salary. And just for the hell of it. When the second round of "market adjustments" comes around, you'll need to justify why he should even keep you around instead of shipping your job off to India. After all, you are overpaid.

    "If IT workers didn't insist on inflated wages, we'd be a lot more happy. The jobs are going overseas as Americans ask for too much money to do what is essentially a basic task. Anyone can program a computer given enough books to read. Anyone can fix computer problems. It's not like it's a gift - IT professionals aren't "chosen by the elders" or "pre-ordained by the prophecy" - they're just guys and gals who type on keyboards all day.""

    Spoken like someone who actually hasn't been long on this earth. Here's the big clue for you. We're NOT all alike. We look different, talk different, think different. We have different skills, and temprements. Likewise IT isn't "just guys and gals who type on keyboards all day." any more than Ray Charles is just someone who bangs on a piano all day.

    "I'm not trolling - this is a point I've tried to make countless times on slashdot (but always been modded out of existance)."

    Maybe not trolling, but not enlightening either.

    "The free market America tried to hard to push on the world has finally come of age. It was instigated when America was a very economically-viable place to have a business. Now, that free market has gained more momentum in other, more economically steady, parts of the world. Because of that, the jobs are now flowing the other way, which America doesn't seem to like."

    There's more to it than that, but since you insist on simplistic answers to lifes hard questions...

    "Something about cake and eating it springs to mind... ;)"

    Oviously someone bitter about others ambitions bearing fruit.

  119. Picky linguistics terminology by alleycat0 · · Score: 1

    As someone who's taken a number of linguistics courses, i'd like to point out that the techies in India are speaking English *perfectly*...they do not speak it accented by some other primary language, but rather they speak a different dialect of English - just as those from the 'deep south' speak a dialect nearly as unintellible at times to us northerners.

    --
    I am not a number - I am a free man!
    1. Re:Picky linguistics terminology by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      No kidding. When Southerners ask me "You want me to plug it up?", I know what they mean, but I can't help but think "Sure. Plug your computer up. Plug it up with dirt, with sand, with toilet paper, whatever you want. But first, would you mind putting the power plug *IN* the wall for me?"

      To be fair, there is an up-side to helping out Southerners: They're almost always incredibly polite. Even when they were angry, they were almost always polite. I'd much rather deal with a polite Southerner than a rude, demanding person from certain other parts of the country.

      Here's a side-story: I spent a few years in a Spanish-speaking country, and became pretty fluent in Spanish. When I'd take support calls from persons whose native language was Spanish, they were almost universally nice, polite, and easy to work with as long as I spoke English with them. As soon as I started speaking Spanish to them (to try and make it easier), they would invariable get VERY demanding. I never could figure out why that happened.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  120. Annoying by cashcraft · · Score: 1

    Certain companies (name starts with N and ends in etgear) will go through the knowledge base, try the solutions there and then tell you that you device is broken, and tell you to exchange it for a new one. Talk about bad tech support.

    But others, like MacSense have tech support people (web) who actually know what they are talking about.

    It is rather annoying to be told that a product that works perfectly fine is broken (especially when its the second time they said that).

  121. My God! I have too much to say. by syrrys · · Score: 0

    I think my head is going to explode. People are just know realizing that it was a bad idea to have an end user call India for desktop support? LMFAO! Want a good laugh? Call HP. You will spend most of the day being asked for your personal information because the first, second, third, and fourth person who asked you for it never really typed it in, I guess. Seriously though, I have spoken to managers at their corporate office in Palo Alto, and have asked them if they think outsourcing has created more problems for them than benefits. Every time I get a very quick, "yes, sorry". I have no problem with Indian people, I just never want to talk to another one for the rest of my life, thanks to HP.

    --
    "Patience is not a virtue, it's a waste of time."
  122. Atleast One Exception To The Rule by hdflsts · · Score: 1

    While I have had more than my share of support nightmares, try getting Antec Tech support to replace a power suppy in a rack server case in timely fassion, or just getting them to return your call in the same day you placed it. One company's tech support has always shined in my experience, CISCO. Sure you pay a premium for their support, and I do mean a premium. However when you log a support case with CISCO, either via phone or from the CCO website, you know that depending on the severity of your case, you will be intouch with an ENGINEER, not some lacky off the street, in a very timely maner. Depending on the time of day that you open your case you could be speaking with someone in the US, Europe, Australia or just about anywhere else in the world. Each and every time that I have had to contact support, the person that I spoke with was pleasant, sympathetic, and very knowledgeable. Issues have always been resolved quickly, and on a few occasions the engineers have gone beyond what was required by my support contract. Cisco from my experience seems to be one company that understands that a customer with a resolved problem will likely remain a customer. I dread the day that I need to contact TAC, not because I fear an unpleasnt outcome, but because I know that my users are going to be climbing down my back because of a network outage. I take comfort in knowing that while there is an issue that will put the heat on me, I have the wonderful people at CISCO's TAC to save my bacon.

    Remember, tech support has to be one of the most thankless jobs on earth. Dealing day in and day out with people with problems and quite a few of them not the most pleasant, or with the most realistic expectations. We all have a right to gripe when support fails us, and quie often it does. On the opposite side of that coin though, remember to thank the support person who has done a good job, resolved your problem for you, and on that rare occasion gone above and beyond. A simple "Thank You" costs you nothing, but goes a long way for the poor soul who has to listen to bitching and moaning all day long, no matter what their pay scale.

    Just my two cents worth.

  123. Canadian doing american tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I work for a respectable call centre in Canada that is basicaly a tech support dept for hire for American & Canadian companies, so I guess this is an opinion from the other side of the fence. A lot of people mention a language barrier problem with speaking with overseas call centres. You might be suprised to find out those might not be from overseas. Many call centres are built in poorer areas, where they know they can get a good suply of replaceable cheap labor. With the world economy the way it is, a lof of immigrants to the United States do not have large amounts of money coming in, and have varying degrees of technical experience. A lot of them are perfect new employees from the point of view of the call centre. I hear more non-english speaking accents when I call any of the american call centres than I do at the location where I work.
    And I would not be so negative about speaking to a foreigner, a lot of them have better educations and a stronger work ethic than an employee you could get here at 5x the price. I deal with a large area of New York and most of the time the really, really dumb customers speak perfect english, while many of the foreign speaking people are at least smart enough to know how to unplug something from the wall for 10 seconds.(Honestly, no word of a lie, some people have no Idea what an electrical outlet, socket, plug, power receptacle, you know the thing you plug things into to make them light up and go, is. They are completly unaware that most household appliances need to be "plugged in" to function. I can understand if they dont know which cable to unplug, but being in your thirtys and not knowing how to install anything from a clock to a toaster is a we bit slow in todays day and age)
    For those of you interested in working out the pay scale difference of hiring Canadians, I provide tier one internet support for $10CAN/hour.

  124. Re:Why use tech support? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but if it breaks and the manual doesn't discuss error codes, what then? Google? What if google is as clear as mud?

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  125. Call centres by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    In fact is actual policy in many Call Centres to cause callers to hang up ( abandon the call ) rather than queue for a long time and speak to someone. This is because a lot of the time they are measured on the average queue time but not penalised for there abandoned rate ( because this is harder to measure accurately ).

    Some call centres actually keep you at the back of the queue once you have been queuing for so long to encourage you to hang up and then ring back later so they have a chance of answering the call within their deadlines and improving their performance ratings. Evil I know but it does go on.

  126. never going back by jafac · · Score: 1

    . . . and thank God I got out of that horrible, stifling, dehumanizing business.

    Helping someone work through a problem is one thing.

    Having to be less than honest with a customer because the salesman's mouth wrote checks that our engineers couldn't cash is quite another.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  127. Allow ME to suggest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That Maddox missed the point of the show ENTIRELY. As you apparently did too. The show was about people benefitting from ILLEGAL ACTS and the immigrant issue merely came up during the show. What the lawyer responded to was a statement, a blanket statement, that illegal immigrants were stealing jobs. Actually, what they are doing is JUST LIKE me robbing you of all your money, and being allowed to keep the fruits of my labors with no consequences. Once again, Maddox and his Howard Sternesque/Andrew Dice Clay type website, seems to think that he is a shining beacon of knowledge, merely because people respondto, or read his webpage. You made the same mistake. For shame!

  128. Is it really the offshoring?-Deja Vu Arguments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I feel that regardless of secure we think that Linux or BSD or Mac OS X may be, that if they had the dominant market share in their current state there would also be a large number of malware apps running wild on those platforms."

    *sigh*
    Slashdot, slashdot, slashdot.

    Why do we even have a moderation system if all we end up with is the half-baked, and the simply plain wrong.

    Oh right, no editors.

  129. On the other hand... by SJS · · Score: 1
    I've always had excellent email support[1] from RefactorIT, not only to explain what I'm not grasping, but they typically would improve their product to help avoid the original cause for confusion.

    I have also received excellent tech-support from the BookEndz folks (Docking station for me TiBook). It's not all bad out there.

    --
    Pick One: http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~stremler/sigs/sigs.html (Note - disable Javascript first!)
  130. a day in the life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are two sides to this story... It is unbeleivable what kind of shit you have to put up with in this job. People will call you up with their brand new computer that they have already managed to get chock full of spyware and god knows what else, then get royally pissed off at you for telling them that this is not a hardware problem and that we cannot send an onsite technician out there to fix it.

    IMHO, spyware is the biggest reason customer satisfaction is dropping. At Dell, where I work, we are not supposed to support this. I will recommed that people download ad-aware or spybot, but even this will not get rid of some of the worst adware. We simply don't have the time to spend hours picking through a customer's registry or going over hijack-this logs. Sometimes a reinstall of Windows is all that we can recommend. Of course, almost everybody who calls in has some kind of spyware, but none of them understand what it is or how they got it. They will often blame you for it, or even accuse you of making it up to cover up a "lemon" computer. Now, I work for an elevated tech support called "Gold," for which people pay extra money to talk to someone who is qualified, not to mention a native English speaker. Everyone working here is more than qualified for this, and most of us would be working as Sys Admins and the like if the IT economy wasn't shit right now. Yet, customers who call their computer a "modem" or a "hard drive" call us incompetent. I have had people screaming at me, then they want to talk to my manager, and then they will tell the manager that I called them all kinds of bad names. Fortunately we record all of our calls so its easy to prove what a lying sack of shit this person was, but there's nothing I can do about it. Give me 5 minutes alone with some of these people who call in and I might start to know the meaning of "job satisfaction." Don't get me wrong, there are also plenty of competent people who call in, mostly people who work in IT, and they are a joy to work with. But at least 90% of the people who call in have no right to call anyone in tech support (India or ortherwise) incompetent.

    Take, for example, the DVD skipping issue mentioned in this article. To most people, this might obviously be a hardware issue. wrong. 95% of the time it turns out to be roxio or some other software causing the problem. (I solved this issue on my own Dell at home by installing Linux on it ;) ). Customers don't want to hear this, they just want someone to come out there with new hardware. Then they turn into the 'Ugly American' and scream at you and your manager. So please be nice the next time you have to call tech support, because every day is a rough day in this job.

    1. Re:a day in the life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work at Dell tech support. I have 2 certs (A+ and Network+) with no previous technical support experience. I did learn a lot at Dell (great resources) but when customers call in and start demanding that we remove spyware, viruses (sp?), and other malware while teaching them how to use a keyboard at the same time. Nothing beats some woman yelling at you for porn spyware on a PC and blaming you since I put it there to having a guy masterbate while reinstalling WinXP. Since all the customer hears is a voice and not physically near the tech, they will act in a rude manner since thier ID is unknown for a social interaction (studies were done, check APA.org). The above post is right, tech support is rough (my blood pressure got to 149/98) but techs should be respected since YOU called them for HELP. Also be nice if companies would support thier own products/services and not dump it on Dell.

  131. It's a different crowd now. by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    I think that one of the reasons customer service has dropped is because of a fundamental change in who does tech support.

    Way back in the Dark Ages of the early 90s, my first job during school was helpdesk work. (Picture starting during the first year your university offered dial-up Internet access. Evil stuff...) It was sometimes very frustrating, but it sure beat all the other student jobs like working in the cafeteria or driving the espresso machine at Starbucks. It was also how I found out that an IT job was right for me, so it served as a training ground.

    The landscape has changed somewhat now...back then, everyone in support was at least somewhat tech-savvy. Now with fewer domestic entry-level support jobs, and fewer people willing to go into IT, the call centers have to settle for lower-level workers. It's also a vicious cycle...the low skill frustrates the customers, the workers' bad attitudes frustrate the company, who moves the jobs offshore, only to get the customers angrier.

    My solution to this problem would be to have US companies (a) raise support salaries by enough to keep the workers happy and their bills paid, and (b) to locate call centers in cheap areas of the country so they could still make the same profit margin. My Rust Belt city really got a boost in the 80s/90s when companies started locating their support functions there...it practcically rebuilt the middle class after the factories died!

  132. It's the knowledge, not the accent-MDF. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Tech support suffers because of marketing and feature envy. "

    Tech support suffers because a long time ago. companies needed to sell a product to the masses that was complicated. So what to do? Well a good thing, and a bad thing. The good thing is that computers did get easier to deal with, hardware and software. The bad thing is that because of the campaign to get products sold. The industry convinced the masses that hardware, and software are easier than they really are. Read the marketing material some time, and contrast that with one's actual experience using the product. Throw in the overall social attitude towards education, technology, and science and you can see a recipe for disaster. Customer service is just the tip of the iceberg. Now as someone who used to work customer service. not all customers are bad, and quite a few have legitimate beefs with the company. It's a matter of weeding.

  133. AOL and Indians by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    Try calling the nightmare support for AOL these days. It's over an IP connection to India. Besides the fact the connections suck, the accents are often difficult to understand, but you just acan't ear anything and you have to repeat yourself ten times to get anything accomplished. The worst part is, I'm a 32 y.o white guy. Imagine what my 60+ customers have to deal with when they try AOL support. It just doesn't work.
    This is not to bash Indians in any way. But it's AOL's poor choice to use foreign tech support in this manner that's very inneffective, especialy when they're reading from those annoying scripts they're given.

    1. Re:AOL and Indians by NerveGas · · Score: 3, Insightful


      I don't have any problem with any person in the world providing the support. I don't care what country they're from, really. But I do expect two things from them:

      1. They should be proficient in the basic responsibilities of their job.
      2. They should be understandable.

      Unfortunately, finding a support rep that meets even one of those qualifications seems to be quite the accomplishment for most companies.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  134. Divide and Conquer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Dell's mistake is in trying to provide it all. They should take a leaf from the airline industry, where the equivalent of Dell and Gateway, I mean United and US Airways, can't deal with the complexity of customer relations, so they let Travelocity do it.

    Today I got into a complicated situation: my wife made a reservation for me, using her credit card, through Travelocity, on a United flight operated by US Airways.

    I needed a boarding pass and a way to enter my frequent flyer number. First I tried US Airways. Nope, not our problem. We're busy going out of business, so leave us alone. Then I tried United. Umm, no, we don't know anything, execpt that we can barely make ends meet. Next, Travelocity! Travelocity's heavily Spanish accented rep (I say that to emphasize that she may be in another country, like the Indian Dell reps) just solved the problem without bugging me too much. Presumably, Travelocity extracts part of the very small value of my ticket for this effectiveness.

    What needs to happen in tech support is that the customer deals with the company providing the tech support, rather than the company putting together the hardware deals. Dell can put together hardware deals by efficiently bullying various providers. They should receive some value for that, but there should be a separate company I make the purchase from and call for tech support.

    When I get on a plane marked US Airways with a United ticket in my hand, I still know that it's Travelocity I will turn to to decide my next flight and to handle any associated wrinkles. There should be an analogy in buying PCs and tech support.

    Otherwise, just pay a premium for an Apple and kwitcher bitchin, because they CAN handle it all. They just charge more to handle it all. TANSTAAFL!

  135. Karmic evolution in action by shm · · Score: 0, Troll

    Okay, how do I put this? If you call tech support with or without RTFM, you deserve what you get.

    Return that box to the store, you're not qualified to use it.

  136. the problem hits the mainstream by brre · · Score: 1
    Consumer Reports (June 2004) advises that buyers should weigh quality of technical support as much as any other factor.

    They also note that quality of support is dropping pretty much across the board, from all computer manufactuers. They note cost saving as an issue here.

    And they take special note of offshoring affecting quality.

    They advise consumers that if you are having trouble understanding or being understood on tech support phone calls, ask to speak to a manager.

    So I'd say the problem has hit the mainstream.

    However it's not exclusively an offshoring problem. It's a quality of service problem. Good support costs the seller money. As buyers we have the power to reward sellers who don't short us on support.

  137. Why don't they [telecommute] Help to the SEUS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The could have done what JetBlue did, and outsource it to your house.

  138. BSOL (Blue Screen Of Landfill) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Crap service is going to undermine their reputation."

    Or computers are going to be so cheap that you throw them away when you have a problem. Just look at inkjets.

  139. Tech Support is a LOSS Leader by da_Den_man · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I managed a Computer Store for 3 years, and developed a reputation of being able to solve problems. This brought the customers in and kept them coming back, and telling friends that also came in. My business was selling parts, so I gave information away for free. This produced great sales and great rapport with the clients. Not for any reason other than the solutions were explained, the language was without accent(other than a Southern Drawl), and the recommended solutions WORKED. It increased sales because the clients understood that any problems would be resolved Fairly.

    I left that position to work for a Software Company as the Technical Support Manager. This is when Problems became " Issues " and my team of techs also had to make Sales Calls, and after a time were instructed to SELL more than Fix. Time on the phone was rated, solutions were dropped down to quick fixes to get them off the line and get to the next person. Towards the end of my tenure a 900 help line was implemented, and the company went to EMAIL or 900 calls ONLY. They never understood why Technical Support costs them money, and couldn't MAKE money. No matter how many times I tried to explain that SUPPORT should be given freely, as the clients have already PAID for the product (At least for the version they bought). Soon it broke down to releases being rushed (almost a year before they were even ready) because the stock holders wanted to cash out. The Product and the company later went under, in part due to the Internet boom ("Everything on the Net Should be FREE!!") and partially due to no support being given to ANY product without a signed and paid contract.

    Technical Support taught me more about human nature than I cared to know. It also taught me that when someone BUYS something, they should be able to call the manufacturer and get support when the product fails. These days it seems that it is easier and cheaper to just replace the product (meaning spending money for a replacement) Rather than fight through the Technical Support nightmare (Language barriers DO affect SALES. ) or the non-solutions provided because the person on the other end of the phone has no clue what it is you are talking about.

    When I buy a car or a major appliance, and there is a recall or a problem, I take it back to the dealer where I purchased it to get it repaired. If I have a question on how something on that vehicle or appliance I call that same dealer. They sold it, they shoudl REPRESENT it, at least if they want me to buy from them again. I consider any purchase over $100 a MAJOR purchase. I shouldn't have to go through a translator to get an issue resolved. I shouldn't be talking to Hamir in India when I bought the product downtown at Sears or Best Buy. I should and EXPECT to get the problem solved ASAP rather than say "Oh, thats just how it works, and I have to live with it".

    Computers are the ONLY industry where being treated properly (sure, its because of my ignorance I am asking a QUESTION) and with respect to being a CUSTOMER is not required. It has been this way for Years and is only getting worse. Companies in the Industry don't feel they OWE the customer anything, because we have become a Nation/World of consumers. THX1138 anyone? Its turned into a "Brave New World".

    --
    You keep going until you die..."Me".
    1. Re:Tech Support is a LOSS Leader by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      You can't really compare a computer to a car in terms of support. People don't buy a car, take out some of the factory components, put in some of their own, modify some of the others, change the computer code, and then take it back to the factory to ask why their car doesn't work with all of their modifications.

      I worked the support end of things for a couple of years. I even worked one of the 900 numbers where we would help the customer with anything they wanted. Software, hardware, education, programming, whatever they wanted. And after the time I put in, I can say that 95% of the calls fell very neatly into two categories:

      (a) Bad hardware from manufacturer. These were nearly always easy to accurately diagnose, and set up an appointment for a replacement.

      (b) Something the customer did to their computer.

      As for support for (a), it should certainly be there. And guess what - it's easy to provide. Support for (b) is a crock. "Yeah, I done installed 47 different applications, got infected by thirty viruses, installed some crap-ware, and now I want your company to cover the cost of making all 47 of those programs work again." Tough. Eat it.

      If you think it's a loss-leader, then take the loss. But myself, I've seen that it's nothing but a loss. People will come in after screwing up their machines, ask you what they can do, not accept your answers, keep asking you over and over to try and get you to say something they like, and finally get frustrated and leave. Or, if they do take your advice, they generally screw it up again, and again, and again, and again.

      If you make $100 selling a computer, is it really worth your while to then spend 20 to 30 hours helping that person later on? Not really. And that does the customer a disservice: I can't tell you how many fly-by-night, corner-store computer shops start up, sell a bunch of computers, and a year later get swamped in support costs, go out of business, and their (ex) customers who have legitimate support needs are then screwed.

      Support from a manufacturer should be limitted to:

      (a) We'll make sure that the hardware is working correctly.
      (b) If we sold you an OEM version of Windows, we'll give you the Windows support that you would otherwise have been able to get from Microsoft.
      (c) We'll ensure that the other software we sold you works as intended.
      (d) In order to ensure points (b) through (c), we may have to restore your hard drive to the way it was when you bought it, and you'll lose anything you haven't backed up. Sorry, your customizations are your responsibility.

      That's not coming from me just as someone who occasionally still has to provide support, but from me as a consumer. I'd much rather buy from a company that will backup its product, but not swamp itself in extraneous support costs that will put it out of business.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:Tech Support is a LOSS Leader by da_Den_man · · Score: 1
      I agree to what you have said....my point was lost in my own ranting I guess. There is no accountability in this industry. There is no support even when something HASN'T been modified. With that said: People don't modify their vehicles? Where do you live? I can say with utmost assurity that if I install an AFTERMARKET product in my vehicle( like a new radio)....I have just voided my warranty for the stereo and electrical components. That doesn't mean when something stops working, I cannot get support for it. It just means they disable (remove) the stereo and other aftermarket products before troubleshooting. I know, because it has happened.

      As for your A,B,C,D items....If ONLY it was this way. MS charges for support prior to them MAKING the determination of error. If you go into a newsgroup or forum for support, and you ask an ignorant question (I claim FULL ignorance when asking a question....cause I wouldn't ASK if I already knew) you get assaulted by people who know more and HAVE to tell you how smart they are. Fine & Dandy, but just answer the question please.

      If I buy a product (software) I CANNOT return it when it doesn';t work for ANY reason. cause I already opened it. Cause I broke the seal to read the agreement that was stuffed inside that says if you can read this, it is yours. Software companies only insure the MEDIA. Not the content. This is what I have issues with.

      --
      You keep going until you die..."Me".
    3. Re:Tech Support is a LOSS Leader by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      If I buy a product (software) I CANNOT return it when it doesn';t work for ANY reason. cause I already opened it. Cause I broke the seal to read the agreement that was stuffed inside that says if you can read this, it is yours. Software companies only insure the MEDIA. Not the content. This is what I have issues with.

      That's why I believe that all software is shareware. I try it out, see if it's worth keeping. If it is, I buy it. ; )

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    4. Re:Tech Support is a LOSS Leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free and Open Source is best. I rarely had a problem with Linux.

  140. Indians just aren't suited for it by adbudha+kusu · · Score: 1

    Wish I'd seen this article earlier to make some important observations. Please mod this up if you think appropriate. As an Indian -- I can categorically assert that Indians are simply not cut out for call-center and tech-support type jobs. This is totally politically incorrect, some idiots might even ascribe this as a racist troll post -- but the education system and religious customs in India permit and encourage ABSTRACT thought and behavior. Routine, repetitive tasks go TOTALLY against the grain of the Indian personality (in general.) An Indian taking tech-support calls will simply get bored out of his mind and won't do the freaking job properly (I mean who could under the circumstances.) I suggest that only programming, and design jobs that require a higher level of abstract thought be off-shored. Send the mundane jobs elsewhere. Granted this won't be popular in India where sheer number of jobs are needed; so I'm only speaking from the corporate standpoint. Peace out.

    1. Re:Indians just aren't suited for it by Kodack · · Score: 1

      Actually I think the Indian people are as suited for it as American people. Both countries have excellent educational opportunites and large groups of English speaking people who are educated. The fact is that tech support, call center, type jobs are boring, repetative and painfull for anybody to do for a living, regardless of culture or race. I worked in a CompUSA call center for 3 1/2 years and the average turnover rate was about 8 months. It is one of the most stressfull jobs and now the pay isn't even good enough to justify the pain. Most of the people working in call centers now are not given the tools or the time to train and understand the products. They are essentially paper pushers that use canned responses to answer questions. They often don't know any more than someone who bothered to read a support forum.

    2. Re:Indians just aren't suited for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are an idiot.

      Is this analysis the result of some heavy ABSTRACT thinking?

      Somehow other cultures discourage and prevent abstract thinking? Can you provide an example of this amazing phenomenon? One truly wonders how any culture could survive using this unconventional strategy...

      I won't even ask what you think you mean by ABSTRACT BEHAVIOR...

    3. Re:Indians just aren't suited for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying that Indians use abstract thought only isn't right. Indians just have trouble with accent and since Indians don't speak English natively, problems will occur. I speak English only so I can't help an Indian reinstall Windows. What India needs is local companies that can sell to the world. Being dependant on the U.S. will make them almost a slave nation.
      Besides, if an Indian programmer can make a driver for a device, why can't they understand to replace it? Bad training.

  141. What broke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    parent:

    "As is, we're all at the mercy of the horde of vindictive idiots who insist that nothing can possibly be wrong with [insert product here] because it was working yesterday. Of course it was working yesterday; if it hadn't been working yesterday they'd have called in YESTERDAY. What changed? It broke! What's so hard to understand about this?"

    What broke? I just spent all day tuesday troubleshooting a Cisco 1700 router. The client's office was mysteriously lacking an internet connection. We phoned the T1 provider, and they assured us, twice, that from their end everything looked alright. The router wasn't their equipment though, so we had to take care of that ourself. I now wish I stuck to my CCNA courses in school... anyways, after a 6 hour crash course in IOS and much communication with several people who all had similar thick accents, we phoned the ISP again and demanded that they send a tech with a laptop and connect to the internet. We had poked around on that router all day, and I knew that nothing should be wrong with it... the startup configuration was the same as the previous running configuration. It should have established a connection almost immediately. But noooo.... It's obviously messed up and broken because our ISP hasn't changed anything without telling us... they'd never do that.

    Only they did. And as a result we wasted a whole day not fixing a problem that should not have existed in the first place. Why the hell a certain something (I still don't know what) was changed without our client being notified is beyond me, but as soon as we demanded that the tech be sent to verify that their gear was working from our end, they suddenly found a problem and fixed it in a matter of 2 minutes. I was, still am, and for many years will be disgusted by this.

  142. service vs. manufacturing by jlusk4 · · Score: 1

    Ok, I've seen two replies that imply that service jobs don't add value.

    Is this really true?

    Law and medicine are service jobs, aren't they?

    As is transportation and education.

    And software development, imo. I'm not completely convinced that producing configurations of bits counts as manufacturing (but I suppose I could be).

    Hmmm...

    John.

    1. Re:service vs. manufacturing by jlusk4 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe that would be put better as: are manufacturing jobs really necessary to drive an economy?

      If n manufacturing jobs result in kn service jobs, what is k?

      Can manufacturing jobs in Vietnam result in service jobs in India and the Phillipines? (Too lazy to look up the l's and p's.)

      John.

    2. Re:service vs. manufacturing by sjames · · Score: 1

      Ok, I've seen two replies that imply that service jobs don't add value. Is this really true?

      More like an unbalanced economy is not sustainable once the external stimulus goes away.

      In the case of India, it's a matter of scales. India's scale of economy is much lower than the U.S. economy. For that reason, India becomes an inexpensive provider of outsourcing. However, this does nothing to create local demand for when the outsourcing goes away. It's just like the plight of the company town when the company closes the factory.

      It's perfectly predictable that the outsourcing will go away. They got the business in the first place based primarily on lowest price. How long before economic growth there makes the cheap labor more expensive? How long before Bangladesh opens call centers?

      If, when that happens, there are no local businesses in India to keep those people employed, their economy will sink faster than it is growing now.

    3. Re:service vs. manufacturing by sjames · · Score: 1

      Can manufacturing jobs in Vietnam result in service jobs in India and the Phillipines? (Too lazy to look up the l's and p's.)

      These are good questions. I'm sure it can result in SOME, but many service jobs must be located where the service is provided. A doctor or a trucker cannot effectively provide a service in Vietnam without going there (telemedicine aside).

    4. Re:service vs. manufacturing by beakburke · · Score: 1

      Oh some of the outsourcing jobs will go away, but some will stay. Just like in the US, it's not all or none of the jobs that move, it's "marginal" jobs.

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  143. Find out where your support rep is. by blanks · · Score: 1

    When ever you get a support rep on the line, in the middle of talking with them, ask them what time it is, if you catch them off guard normally they will blurt out what time is on their clock, computer, terminal what ever.

    Most places tell their support people never answer this question, or have their clocks set to US time, but in just about every situation I have tired this in, it has worked (works with live support online etc..)

    1. Re:Find out where your support rep is. by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      "...or have their clocks set to US time..."

      Wow, when did all of the USA convert to a single time-zone. ;)

    2. Re:Find out where your support rep is. by blanks · · Score: 1

      Ooh geeze, you know what I ment, if you can tell that the time zone is off, say 10 hours you can tell their not in your area :)

    3. Re:Find out where your support rep is. by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      Yea, I was just feeling pedanic... plus it's a pet peeve when people say things like "US Time" or "Canada Time" when that can be anywhere between GMT-8 to GMT-4... erm GMT-3.5 I think, if you count Newfoundland. :D

  144. You may be right about corporate bias by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    One small business I know of had one of their employees tied up on the phone for a total of 6 hours, half of which were actually speaking to someone, trying to do nothing more than get a floppy disk drive for their brand new system. The first round of calling they got a floppy drive sent to them alright but it didn't fit. So they went through another round -- describing in detail the floppy drive they got sent and how it differed from the floppy drive described in the users manual and how it differed from the actual mounting in their chassis. So they finally got another floppy drive sent to them.

    The second drive they received was identical to the first drive they received.

    Now, not _all_ of this time was spent talking to someone in India. Only about 2/3 of it was.

    Even so, small businesses are in no better shape to tolerate this crap than a Fortune 500 company -- and they _did_ have a business support number.

  145. What if there's a bug in the software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the coders supposed to talk with you directly?

  146. and things have changed.... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what else is new.
    there are a lot of new/non english speakers in support, always have been, even when the terrible english speaker is from an english speaking country.

    Between the mumblers and the bling worshippers, I can barely understand half the people I talk to. I have found that some people that are obviously from another country are more understandable than native "english" speakers. At least they TRY to pronounce the words.

  147. You know it's not easy on the Indian people either by Kodack · · Score: 0

    I saw a show on Tech TV where they showed how the people in India get the job, and what training they go through. It's basicly cultural racism in their training. They are only allowed to speak in English when they are on the floor. They are expected to learn about American sports and cultural references. It's like "How to fake American 101" but it's the fact that they try to educate the 'Indian'ness' out of them that scares me. And not being able to speak thier native language at work for fear of reprisal. In the US and in Australia, the children of native people were kidnapped by the government and put into schools to 'Americanize or Australianize' them. They were forced to talk dress and act like a white, and they were beaten like dogs if caught speaking in their native tongue. It was terrible and a common practice through the 1950's.

  148. getting paid to call hell-Honeymooners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Calculated crap management is what makes IT a science."

    Well I guess that answers the question. Whatever happen to Norton?

  149. Example of the beginning of a call by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    Typical call:

    Sir, we need to shut off the computer.

    Good, now we need to unplug all of the wires from the machine.

    very good. now wee need to open the case and unplug the widget x

    very good, now turn on the machine.

    Sorry, nothing happens

    did you press the power button sir?

    Etc for 5 or 10 minutes.

    Notice that the script did not require re-plugging in the power cable, and that the "tech" did not pick up on this. Also note that the "tech" will likely get reprimanded for deviating from the script.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  150. I aint' payin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do tech support for an industry-leading (isn't everything these days?) Windows retail product.

    The basic problem with Support is: it's where the buck stops. Stops being paid that is...

    When all you have access to is some third parties support number or email address that's where you direct all your problems no matter what their root cause.

    Your average home user has a two or three year old, un-updated, Windows install with several different products in there that maybe don't get along too well created by several different companies who don't know or paticularly care about each other. Run Adaware for 'em and you get 200 to 500 hits, etc. Basically within a couple years most customers own a Mess.

    Now, when something goes wrong with The Mess, could be anything, they call Tech Support for the last company they bought something from that provides Support and is actually available to them (unlike MS for the most part).

    So now guess what, some third party Support Desk now has responsibility for The Mess that was created essentially by MS programming, marketing, and other business practices and the Customers lack of computer knowledge.

    Legit costs which should have been borne in the first place by MS (build it right) and the Customer (make an effort and learn something) have been successfully pushed down by them to some vendors Support Desk and anyone is surprised they don't want to pay big bucks to staff it?

    See what would happen if Support were great? Everyone upstream would do even less about software quality than they do now, problems would all just flow down to Support where they'd be magically eliminated.

    Look, poor Support is just how the last guy into The Mess turns around and says "get f-ed, I ain't payin" to everyone else up the chain all the way back to Mr. Bill.

    Expect this to continue because it's a systemic problem.

  151. It wouldn't be if they actually PAID a decent wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  152. Re:There is still one company offering great suppo by somegeekgirl · · Score: 1

    Some people, like me, have PCs because they /need/ a PC over an Apple for various reasons. The software I use won't run on an Apple. Don't be so quick to assume that everyone would be better off with a Mac, or that the only reason Random Person doesn't have one is because he's ignorant/uninformed/lazy. Then again, the only time I ever call tech support is to find out if my DSL is down, and my husband and I build our computers, so we don't have to worry about bad tech support either way.

    --
    http://angel.merseine.nu - Stuff for the poet, diva, geek, romantic and angel in all of us.
  153. Indians are Aryan/speak Indo-European languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sanskrit/Hindi/etc are all Indo-European languages.
    Sanskrit is officially "proto-Indo-Aryan"
    (indo==india) and English itself is descended from
    old/high german+latin which comes from the same
    tree as proto-indo-aryan.

    1. Re:Indians are Aryan/speak Indo-European languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uu huh, and your point is?

  154. Lying to get you off the phone by nasor · · Score: 1

    I've had several bad experiences with off-shore tech support recently in which the support people have actually lied to me in an effort to get me off the phone. I can only assume that they get paid based on call volume, and want to pack as many calls as possible into as short a time as possible.

  155. It's Bills: the 3 V's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It rests in Bill's lap:

    1 - made windows OS the way it is (unstable)
    2 - sold it cheaper than Apple (you pay more for Apple including its relative stability and better support)
    3 - dosn't do his own support, at a consumer level it's mostly left up to other third parties who get caught in the overall Windows mess of the 3 V's: multiple vendors, versions, viruses while attempting to support their own small slice of the wintel product

  156. Escalated? by SeinJunkie · · Score: 1
    This job is hard enough, let them and thier shoddy training be, ask to be esecalated, chances are you can and will be.

    You will not be escalated. You will be passed among 6 different peers who "can't help you" and will attempt to pass you to another department. I have been passed around to people who will say they are passing me to someone else and the extension they pass me to tells me, "The number you dialed is invalid. Goodbye." *click*

    You're right, tech support is hard. I'm working my second tech support job right now and it's taken a bit to get used to. But, the point of this article is that adding a language barrier to the problem is completely unnecessary. Don't trick yourself into believing that the reason why this language barrier is there is anything other than because the company only cares about the bottom line, not the customers.

    From the article:

    Barr has had better luck with supervisors. "But getting to them is like pulling hen's teeth. One tech person indicated they didn't even have a supervisor."
    1. Re:Escalated? by toppsoft · · Score: 1

      Escalation is a joke. My last paid call to Hell (paid as in the customer was paying me because the phone support they bought wasn't getting the job done) resulted in me walking through 30 minutes of basic troubleshooting procedures that couldn't be avoided without blowing the guy's script out of the water.

      Despite at least six requests to escalate, the best I could get out of the guy was lengthy hold times while he consulted some unknown guru who knew slightly more than he did.

      From where I sit, there is no accountability for results. My follow up calls on the same issue required opening new trouble tickets every time because the previous ticket was closed as a 'successful call.'

      I guess they measure success by counting the hangups.

  157. But the real question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orderered after 4 on thursday, battery was on the porch when I got home. Could not believe it.

    Dis me for paying $300 over the cost of a comparably sized and priced Acer if you want.


    Was the battery fully-charged? I would shutter to think one of those gay technical support persons at Apple asked their local iGay community to order its manwhore tranny to walk onto my porch and "eject" their battery direct from their iBook onto my doormat. Was the battery even in a box with the seal of a postal delivery company? *shudders*

  158. Re:Economic Profiling: Certs & Degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, and have also experienced the same where somebody with a bachelors in CIS, A+ with several other certs had to be taught how to slave an IDE HD. Certs & Degrees (Maybe not a PhD) shows memorizing skills only and speak nothing of the ability to apply what is known.

    These fancy pieces of paper are no benchmark, all they show is somebody is able to memorize things in books. Great for the people that can afford the books and/or classes in addition to the tests, bad for anybody that assigns the slightest value to them. I can't count the number of times I have had to explain basic IT principles to somebody with an alphabet after their name in a position where they should know advanced principles like the back of their hand. Want alternate solutions, how about a standardized test based on real world application of knowledge and experience to show how much you shine. Applying for a job: Complete a lab if your resume shows the needed experience and earn an interview. Fancy pieces of paper should at the most get you a shot at the test lab to show how all your book memorizing means shit in the real world.

    Support is only as good as the company wants it to be. This includes: payscale, filtering applicants, training, post training support, structure of tier system and quality of each higher tier, language and communication skills, and quality tools available. If a company shows you what they think of their customers by continuing to provide horrible support due to offshoring or ignorance, speak with your wallet. Speak in groups, organize and show a presence to be taken seriously. A rally that becomes statewide with the banner "Dell Sucks: Build your own! Free workshops!" just might start to get attention.

  159. Re:It's spelled phrank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's spelled P h r a n k"

    OR
    ffrank
    frankk
    phrankk
    etc etc etc etc

  160. Obligatory Nick Burns Quote... by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

    User: I can't get this stupid computer to work!!!!!!

    Nick Burns: Ya, cuz it's the computer that's stupid, right?

    -D

  161. Why consumer tech support sucks by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Support on software is SolidWorks, but then I pay nearly $2000/yr for upgrades and phone support...out of Utah, in my case. So I cancelled my ELink service & asked to release the Elink hold on my Ph# and that resulted in "That will take 7-10 business days." which saved me $20/month.

    And there you have it.

    Everybody wants tech support, but nobody wants to pay for it.

    Let's say that, instead of a minimum-wage script-reading monkey, you get a really competent network admin to answer calls. Also keep in mind that phone support is not a very fun job to do, and that said network admin may demand more money to do support, and that phone support, being a customer-facing job, has requirements on accent and behavior that being a regular network admin may not.

    Let's suppose that this network admin makes, say, $50K/year, which, for a competent troubleshooter, is certainly not very generous. There are ~250 working days in the year, ignoring holidays and vacation and sick leave and the like. That means that our network admin is making $200/day. Given an eight-hour day, that's $25/hour.

    Now, let's assume that this guy works *constantly* every minute of his day, doesn't have a lunch break or anything, never fails to close a ticket in a single call, and has to escalate anything or the like. Let's assume that he maintains a call average of only 15 minutes.

    That means that this guy, not counting management overhead, the guy's benefits, the infrastructure (A/C, the phone line, the costs of the building he's sitting in, etc) run $6 per call. I don't work at an ISP (I suspect some Slashdotters can provide better numbers than I can), but I'm guessing that on $20/mo service, that call has pretty much blown all profits for the month, even with all our generous assumptions.

    Now, sure, Earthlink could provide really great tech support. But they'd have to charge $30/mo instead of $20/mo to pay for the tech support. And they'll lose out to their competitors.

    I have a friend who just had his mother call him twice -- first that she couldn't get online, second that the wireless hub was malfunctioning, and third that she had called someone else and he had figured out that she had unplugged the wireless hub. She's been calling just about every other day with technical problems.

    So people want this good, free tech support, but they simply do not want to pay for it. Expert knowledge simply is not cheap -- most people that really understand a system can get a more comfortable job than tech support.

    Really, the only tech support I've ever thought even remotely decent is the MSDN Universal support -- which costs even more than your Solidworks package does.

    Retail figured this out a long time ago. The guy at the appliance store doesn't know how to fix any problems you have -- he can take any returns you have, but that's about it. Problem? Just return the thing.

    I'd like to see more services have "no support" options, or at least "charge per call" support, so that I don't have to subsidize others. I'd strongly prefer web pages with common problems than to pay to have some guy waiting for me to maybe call.

  162. People expecting an "expert" for $20/mo? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Experts are not likely going to be on the helpdesk. I know helpdesk workers often consider themselves experts, but come on.

    The funny thing is that people expect to have an serious domain expert on the other end of the line at their beck and call (and no $2/minute charges or anything like that) when they call up for tech support for a service that they pay a lousy $20/month on. Or maybe on a $500 computer with essentially no profit margin. You can't do it. It's just non-economical. The only sane way to deal with this is to try to make products that are as idiot-proof as possible so that people never call tech support.

    Frankly, I'd like to see a "zero tech support" sticker, so that I could buy only ZTS products, so that I don't have to subsidize people that need tech support. It's just more of my money down the tube. Have a good web site with the same data that you'd feed your tech support people, and I'll be happy.

  163. My 2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work as a Supervisor for the M$ ISP.
    I'm from Argentina (yeap ... not all call centers are in India).
    I can see that "loosing" jobs over seas can sound really bad. But let me give you my 2 cents...
    The people reading /. usually forget how many people is in front of a computer these days.
    I've tried to get customer to press 3 keys at the same time (Ctrl + Shift + F12) for over 20 minutes .... and they were not able to do it. So I'm not programming on a mainframe, I'm just trying to create a simple DUN.
    Sure, we are doing IT work ... but would any of you guys would like to teach a 84 years old lady the whole concept of "drag and drop" over the phone for 2 dollars an hour?

    I though so...

  164. It's not just the tech support guys, mind you! by It's+the+tripnaut! · · Score: 1

    These are actual calls from the US to an offshore call center. TECH: I need you to right click on My Computer icon. Cust: yes, I click. TECH: then you'll have to select Properties Cust: no, I don't see properties. TECH: sir, you should have seen the menu pop out and you'd find properties at the bottom part of the box Cust: no, no menu. i click on icon, yes? TECH: No sir, I need you to right click on the icon. Cust: yes, I click, right? I click. program opens, no properties. - - - - - - - Cust: I'm just wondering what these shiny circle thingies are. TECH: Sir, those are compact discs and you'll need them to install a few programs in your computer. I'll be guiding you through the installation process, now I need you to place that on the CD drive. Cust: I don't know where it is. (TECH explains how to locate the drive) ...yes, that's the one which appears like a platform with a hole in the middle. Cust: oh, you mean the mug holder?

  165. My Account Information is Where? by Mage99 · · Score: 1

    Another issue with these over seas help desk deals that no one ever mentions is that once the american companies provide access to their customer databases to all the employees in foreign countries, your personal information is now available for missuse in a foreign land and at this point there is nothing you can do to stop it. Think of it any service you pay for ships their customer care over to india and all your billing info is there for the taking and you don't even know it. There are currently some lawmakers talking about putting some safety checks in place but at this point there are no such checks to make sure its ok with you that your personal/billing information is shared with foreign nationals.

    --
    We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act, but a habit.
  166. coming next by tropavantgarde · · Score: 1

    >"USA Today is reporting on the growing concern of the language barrier" "USA Today is reporting on growing rumors that, in response to tech support issues, Microsoft is developing BableFish XP. To use it, simiply stick it in your ear and press ctrl-alt-delete."

    --

    --A witty sig proves nothing.--

  167. Re:There is still one company offering great suppo by Ded+Mike · · Score: 1

    Some people, like me, have PCs because they /need/ a PC over an Apple for various reasons. The software I use won't run on an Apple.

    Sorry, but my experience is that Apple is a more stable, friendly and intuitive system (not to mention much more secure) than Windows is or ever will be. Noobs, especially non-geek, artsy fartsy or tech but non-geek (biogeek or nano/engineering geek) pick up OSX in seconds, compared to Windows' hours/days/never. It may just be that you actually DO get what you pay for. This is why Windows is crap, because most Windows users don't demand more from Microsoft and believe it is free with the computer.

    --
    Remember guys, this is Amerika. Just because you have the most votes, doesn't mean you get to win.--Fox Mulder
  168. APPLE still offers GREAT tech support by Ded+Mike · · Score: 1

    Also, DEMAND that the software you /need/ be made to run on Mac/Linux and let the software publisher know you will otherwise take your business elsewhere. Additionally, MAC OSX is unique, since you can run Windows and Linux on the same box, so you COULD run your software you /need/ on a Mac and enjoy a more stable and secure and joyful/clueful platform while reaping the benefits of Apple's GREAT tech support.

    --
    Remember guys, this is Amerika. Just because you have the most votes, doesn't mean you get to win.--Fox Mulder
  169. There is no AC in the kitchen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no air conditioning in the kitchen,
    and that's why offices are preferred to kitchens,
    but i'm sure you knew that :)

  170. Just imagine.. by beakburke · · Score: 1

    What you could get for a quarter million in South Dakota!!

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  171. You get what you pay for by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    The thing that really gets me is that most people can generally blame themselves for this problem. If you put two near-identical computers side-by-side, with the only difference being that one costs $300 more but includes much better after-sales support, the vast majority people will buy the cheaper PC every time.

    Consumer price pressure has pushed base model prices down to the $500 mark. Microsoft Windows sucks up 20% of that right off the bat. The hardware is already near zero margin. The only place left to cut cost is in services.

    I work for an IT services company in the small business sector. We use Dell a lot, but we always strongly recommend the OptiPlex models over the Dimension models. Customers always complain that the OptiPlex costs significantly more then the Dimension does. The first time they call tech support, they find out why. Everyone who has overrode our recommendation and gone with a Dimension has lived to regret it. Some even learn from the experience.

    Penny wise, pound foolish.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.