Slashdot Mirror


Beer Found to be as Healthy as Wine

Matt Clare writes "Researchers at the University of Western Ontario (Canada) recently found that beer has the same positive qualities that wine has previously been found to have. The media release quotes professor John Trevithick, 'We were very surprised one drink of beer or stout contributed an equal amount of antioxidant benefit as wine, especially since red wine contains about 20 times the amount of polyphenols as beer.' For more info on how beer helps police harmful free radicals in blood, The London Free Press also has an article."

517 comments

  1. mmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    GNU/BEER

    1. Re:mmm by Soko · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pfft. You zealot. I prefer FreeBeer.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:mmm by Cylix · · Score: 3, Funny

      Everyone knows OpenBeer is way better then FreeBeer.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    3. Re:mmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      FreeBeer? There's a reason it tastes like piss.

    4. Re:mmm by s_mencer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
      -- Benjamin Franklin

    5. Re:mmm by b!arg · · Score: 3, Funny

      FreeBeer is dying...

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    6. Re:mmm by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Umm...where do I insert the pun about the empty thirty case floating in a pool of my own enibriation?

    7. Re:mmm by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

      I wanted to try that new OpenBeer, but the packaging was so damn secure that I couldn't open the bottle. I then thought about DragonFly Beer, but I'm not too comfortable with the ingredients.

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    8. Re:mmm by ThousandStars · · Score: 1, Funny

      Netcraft confirms: FreeBeer is dying.

    9. Re:mmm by WhitePanther5000 · · Score: 1

      FreeBeer doesn't exist, we own the intellectual property to it!

      -SCO

    10. Re:mmm by Xabraxas · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sense of humor where are you???

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    11. Re:mmm by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "FreeBeer is dying..."

      MSBeer's EULA prevents you from driving after you drink it. :(

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:mmm by Wavicle · · Score: 1
      I'm afraid OpenBeer contains a non-literal copy of the ingredients SCO's proprietary Beer offering, and is therefore infringing on their IP.

      To wit, this comparison of ingredients shown by SCO CEO Darl McBride at a recent conference:

      Open source:
      • Water
      • Malt
      • Hops
      • Yeast


      SCO:
      • High fructose corn syrup
      • Partially hydrogenated vegetable oil
      • Monosodium glutamate
      • E. Coli


      Fine spirits analyst L. DiDio from the wankee group stated unequivocally after reviewing the ingredients there is strong evidence that some ingredients have been copied illegally from SCO into OpenBeer and other free beer offerings.
      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    13. Re:mmm by xRelisH · · Score: 1

      I thought FreeBeer forked into Beer.org and BeerFree86

    14. Re:mmm by Brandybuck · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's always NetBeer, you can drink it out of any container, even your toaster...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    15. Re:mmm by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 1

      I always found OpenBeer to be too tightly packaged. It's like they don't want anyone from the outside to get at the good stuff at all...

    16. Re:mmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many had he drunk when he said that?

    17. Re:mmm by dwhittington · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer WINE as in FREE WINDOWS.

    18. Re:mmm by LousyPhreak · · Score: 1

      But they are not nearly as secure as NetBeer

      --
      -- Karma: beyond good and evil - mostly affected by posting political
    19. Re:mmm by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Ob. zealot response: "If you don't like it, you can modify the recipe in your own bathtub!"

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    20. Re:mmm by iezhy · · Score: 1

      It involved administering five beverages (stout, lager, red wine, pure alcohol and a placebo-like non-alcoholic drink) hmm... how could they use non-alcoholic drink as placebo? i thought the idea of using placebo is that u dont know its placebo? and how can someone take a drink and dont feel it doesnt contain any alcohol? :)

    21. Re:mmm by freebeer · · Score: 1

      Ummm, no I'm not? Unless you know something I don't.....

    22. Re:mmm by N3Z · · Score: 1

      If it's not OpenBeer, it has not value to me!

      --
      .signature not found
    23. Re:mmm by VitaminB52 · · Score: 1

      GNU/BEER, FreeBeer? Any beer will do as long as it's a lot of beer :) . Cheers !

    24. Re:mmm by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      I was in a bad mood, and I apologize for the tone of my remark, but just sticking "GNU/" in front of the topic of an article does not make something funny.

      GNU/Humor. Are you laughing?

    25. Re:mmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it does mke me laugh, but mainly because I am an asshat.

    26. Re:mmm by T'hain+Esh+Kelch · · Score: 0

      OpenBeer is better!

      Or as an Apple zealot, iBeer!

    27. Re:mmm by umshaggy · · Score: 1
      Obviously this wasn't a double blind test. I would expect that most people would also be able to tell the difference between a stout and a red wine.

      In short, there was no placebo. This does not mean that the other beverages were not used as controls. It just means that you can't completely rule out the placebo effect for people who already believe that beer will make them healthier. Unfortunately, beer is a pretty distictive beverage, so there isn't any real way to eliminate this problem.

      --
      Did you buy a Neuros today?
    28. Re:mmm by umshaggy · · Score: 1
      Just re-read post, and realized I ignore the placebo claim. Placebo effect just means that something can happen because you "think" it will happen. So, I didn't address your point that one can tell the difference between beer and non-alcoholic beer. Sorry for not reading clearly.

      In response to this, I would say that a good european stout may only have about 3% alcohol by volume. That is pretty low, and someone who drinks beer could very easily not notice any alcoholic effect from drinking one. (which doens't mean that it doesn't affect them, just that they dont' notice it. Don't drink and drive kids! :)

      --
      Did you buy a Neuros today?
  2. I think I speak for all of us ... by MrRTFM · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... when I say

    "WOOHOO!!"

    --
    You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
    1. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think I speak for intelligent people when I say "Who funded this study?"

    2. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by dema · · Score: 1

      Xnot all of usX

    3. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      no, you speak for the normal people. The intelligent people are asking "but what negative effects cancel out the positive ones?"

      It only mentions "positive" qualities.

    4. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell can "all of us" say that they were first in line? I mean, yeah.. perhaps everyone did her at the same time, but a line implies an order. A one dimensional order. There can be only one 'first' in a line.

    5. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

      WOOHOOTOO!

    6. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      perhaps all of us perceived that we were first in line because the line was disconnected by a bouncer who was telling everyone they were first and she was housed down in between rape sessions?

      oh, please don't use bad words like "hell". this is the internet. keep it clean.

    7. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I think I speak for intelligent people when I say "Who funded this study?""

      I think I speak for N.O.M.A.A.M when I say STFU.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by darthwader · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think I speak for all the people who actually read the article, when I say: "According to the London Free Press article, the research was funded by Labatt and Guinness".

      (Who hoo! I'm going to get +3 informative, just because I actually bothered to RTFA. Karma karma karma.)

      --
      I hate it when I make a joke and I get modded "+5 insightful". Mod the stupid comments "funny", not "insightful", pleas
    9. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by nebaz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Answer: from the article

      I concurred. And then I jokingly asked if the study was sponsored by a brewery.

      But that's no joke.

      "The research was funded by Labatt and Guinness," said Trevithick, adding each brewery paid about $25,000 to finance the study. "But it's an unconditional grant and we made it very clear to them that if we had any findings we viewed as being appropriate to publish, that we'd publish them whether or not they were harmful to Labatt or Guinness."

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    10. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The intelligent people are asking "but what negative effects cancel out the positive ones?"

      Really? I thought they already knew that one or two drinks a day is positive, but more are not. I don't see how this changes anything (except what to drink). I've never heard of a single study showing that two drinks a day is bad for anyone without specific contradictions (mostly liver related).

    11. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by drawfour · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do not speak for me. I cannot stand beer. Hard liquor, however, hell yeah! If they need any volunteers for a study of the antioxidant effectiveness of vodka, tequila, rum, whiskey, scotch, or any other hard alcohol, I'll volunteer.

    12. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
      Wrong!!!! You're +4 right now.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    13. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by SoSueMe · · Score: 1
      It is in the article:
      " Trevithick cautions larger daily intakes (three drinks per day) actually increase the risk of these diseases."


      I should have known..., no benefit to me.
    14. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      RTFPR. They did. You missed it.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    15. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by SoSueMe · · Score: 2, Funny

      I must be alergic to beer, I drink 18 and I throw up.

    16. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 3, Informative

      RTFM:

      Even though red wine contains more polyphenols than beer, this study showed the body absorbs about equally effective amounts of bioactive molecules such as polyphenols from beer and wine. Beer, wine, stout, and matured spirits (rum, whisky, sherry and port), which extract tannins from the oak casks they are matured or stored in, all contain significant amounts of polyphenols.

      As if I needed another excuse to drink.

    17. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by atrizzah · · Score: 2

      That's what they all say

    18. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by lphuberdeau · · Score: 1

      Who cares? It's actually the best excuse I have up to now for drinking beer during my courses... and between... and after...

      I just base the quality of the sources based on if I like the result.

      --
      Qui ne va pas à la chasse n'a pas de gibier
      PHP Queb
    19. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Zardus · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, all the intelligent people are piss drunk.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    20. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by _Spirit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There has been some research published on effects on the brain that showed every drink has a negative impact there. I think the conclusion was that one drink a day could be justified to get the benefits described here, and more would be counterproductive. I read this in the newspaper earlier this year, and can't be bothered to google for it as I'm supposed to be working, so I don't have a reference handy.

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

    21. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of a single study showing that two drinks a day is bad for anyone without specific contradictions (mostly liver related).

      I think it's usually said that you shouldn't drink at all on one or two days a week. The reason being that that makes it less likely that you become dependent on it.

    22. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      no, you speak for the normal people. The intelligent people are asking "but what negative effects cancel out the positive ones?"

      I guess it's a good thing I don't regularly eat eggs, chocolate, or drink alcohol, and this is just out of habit, not based on contradictory studies that are released biweekly.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    23. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      You got modded funny, but seriously, even the most foofoo drinks out there that people describe as, "you can't even taste the alcohol in it" taste like Windex to me.

      (Not that I know what Windex tastes like, just using it in the same way somebody would say, "This tastes like shit!" Doesn't necessarily imply they ate feces earlier for reference.)

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    24. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I should bring that up in my DUI trial. I only had 2 drinks but I don't weigh enough to get outside of their little revenue sliding scale.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    25. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by corinath · · Score: 1

      The way I look at, I am going to have a couple of beers per week any, so it is nice to know that there are some healthy side effects. I consider the drinking of beer to be a hobby. I drive all over looking for new varieties of beer to try.

      At any rate, it is nice to be able to say to my wife that one beer a day is good for me :)

      --
      Hockey - Canada's gift to the world
    26. Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Labatts also donated a building to UWO.

      John Labatt Visual Arts Center

  3. Cheers! by kjots · · Score: 1

    There is a God!

    It must mbe Thursday. I never could get the hand of Thursdays.

    1. Re:Cheers! by yintercept · · Score: 5, Insightful
      There is a God!

      And like God, beer can be healthy if you don't over do it.

    2. Re:Cheers! by nickos · · Score: 1

      Moderate drinkers earn more too! Mine's a pint please.

    3. Re:Cheers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They not only earn more, they appear to produce more. My experience between absolutely dry companies and those that don't mind if their employees capped off their week with a visit to the pub is that the latter significantly out produce the former.

  4. Beer.....drool. by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    Wear your jersey with pride!

    "it's not just for breakfast anymore"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  5. Interesting.... by mentalflossboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And yet, you never hear about a "wine belly."

    --
    "I make people like me... WITH VIOLENCE!" - ATHF
    1. Re:Interesting.... by savagedome · · Score: 4, Funny

      You will, the day they start selling a six pack of wine for $4 in supermarkets.

    2. Re:Interesting.... by mentalflossboy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Good lord, man, what kind of beer are you drinking? A decent beer costs at least 7 or 8 bucks for a six pack. And you can get "decent" bottles of wine for that much at Trader Joes.

      I don't think cost is the issue in the beer/wine debate. It's a lifestyle difference. Wine drinkers will have a glass with dinner. Beer drinkers chug a six pack watching the game on Saturday.

      --
      "I make people like me... WITH VIOLENCE!" - ATHF
    3. Re:Interesting.... by mmmmmhotpants · · Score: 5, Funny

      That reminds me of my driver's education teacher (many years ago) who shared his views with us that he doesn't drink anything unhealthy like beer or soda-pop. Of course I had to make the comment: "so that's a lemonade-belly you got there?".

      --

      can't sleep. clowns will eat me.
    4. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back when I was in college (mid 1980's), we could get a six-pack of Schaefer for under $2.

    5. Re:Interesting.... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think it's more an issue of the amount needed to produce the desired effect. To get a decent buzz on, I need to drink three 12 oz cans or two 16 oz pints of the average 5% alcohol beer. This is 510 calories, the equivalent of eating a large order of French Fries. Light beer is 330 calories, the equivalent of a medium order of french fries. Now, to maintain said buzz, I would need to consume a minimum of 16 oz of beer per hour, which means three hours of drinking is the equivalent of a McDonalds extra-value meal.

      On the other hand, I only need to drink 15 oz of wine to get the same buzz. Wine only has 106 calories per glass, so I'd be about as well off with wine as I would with light beer, though I'd probably enjoy it more as light beer doesn't hit the spot the way nice glass of Merlot would. Shit, drinking a whole bottle of wine is only 500 calories. So drink up, man...5 drinks for the caloric intake of 3, that's my idea of a party.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:Interesting.... by dlbowm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with your argument is, the people who chug a six pack on the couch also don't buy $8 beer. They are quite possibly in the $4 camp.

      I think the people who buy $8 beer are likely to just drink a glass with dinner, as a replacement for wine. I believe a good beer can be just as good an accompaniment as wine. Just depends on the food, or your mood.

    7. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a big red wine nose?

    8. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that interesting? People drink a lot more beer than they do wine because of the % of alcohol. You don't hear about a whiskey belly either.. you drink a 6 pack of beer in a couple hours you'll be drunk, drink the same amount of whiskey and you'll be dead. A lot more calories when you drink 10x as much.

    9. Re:Interesting.... by flink · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can still get a six of PBR for about $4.50 and it is as decent a beer as you can get for that price. Way better than budmillercoors.

    10. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm... actually, there are people with a whiskey belly I have heard about. Log throwers in Scottland drink a bottle of whiskey a day to get a nice round belly for use in their "sport". Talking about alcoholics...

    11. Re:Interesting.... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      If you waited for a sale you could get a 12 pack or Schaefer or Olympia for $3. That's some nasty shit.

    12. Re:Interesting.... by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Beer bellies are caused by overindulgence in beer. It's drinking that six back of Budmilloorsen Lite instead of one bottle of Guinness of Sierra Nevada that does it.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    13. Re:Interesting.... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wine contains chemicals (possibly resveratrol, I'm not sure )
      which act as lipase inhibitors, slowing the absorption of fat.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    14. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can already get a 5 liter box of 12% alcohol wine for 6 bucks.

      Only an alcoholic would mod this informative.

    15. Re:Interesting.... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

      Plus you got that whole Dennis Hopper/David Lynch aesthetic going for you.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    16. Re:Interesting.... by hattig · · Score: 1

      I've got a wine gut :(

      What is it ... Wednesday night. Since Sunday I've had 5 bottles of wine. 2500 calories by your calculations! I had about 4 pints of beer in the same timescale.

      Of course a lot of this wine is drunk watching Farscape, Babylon 5, Angel, Buffy, Twin Peaks and more ... so that is perfectly fine :)

    17. Re:Interesting.... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny
      drinking a whole bottle of wine is only 500 calories.

      Whiskey has an even better buzz to calorie ratio.
      In fact, if you drink enough, the shakes will help burn more calories.

    18. Re:Interesting.... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Informative
      Back when I was in college (mid 1980's), we could get a six-pack of Schaefer for under $2.

      There were even better deals to be had in those days. Carling's Black Label returnable longnecks were usually available on sale for $4.99 for a case of 24. And it tasted marginally better than Schaefer, IMHO. (Rhinelander was often available for $3.99/24pk, but it was undrinkable by any standards.)

      It's kind of odd how almost every single one of the dozens of cheap brands I remember from my school days have been absorbed into the Pabst Brewing Company borg.

    19. Re:Interesting.... by suckmysav · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I think the people who buy $8 beer are likely to just drink a glass with dinner, as a replacement for wine. I believe a good beer can be just as good an accompaniment as wine. Just depends on the food, or your mood."

      This is true. In fact, in Belgium they do use beer in place of wine. Belgium is a small country, yet it has 130 breweries and over 400 types of beer.

      mmmmmm, beer

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    20. Re:Interesting.... by suckmysav · · Score: 2, Funny

      "That reminds me of my driver's education teacher (many years ago) who shared his views with us that he doesn't drink anything unhealthy like beer or soda-pop. Of course I had to make the comment: "so that's a lemonade-belly you got there?"."

      hehe. That reminds _me_ of a time I was eating a ham sandwich when some long haired alternative lifestyle type sat down and started lecturing me on how I was "poisoning my body by consuming dead animal flesh".

      Of course, while he was sternly lecturing me about the evils of pork products, he was busy constructing a roll-your-own cigarette for himself.

      The cognitive dissonance of some people is truly amazing.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    21. Re:Interesting.... by RogL · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you pour your whiskey over ice, your body will have to burn calories to warm it upon drinking... if it's cold enough, you might lose weight by drinking!

      (this sound like a good plan after 2-3 drinks)

    22. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, that sure sounds true!!! I believe that for sure!

    23. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that a bottle of decent whiskey kicks the shit out of the best wines.

    24. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      It's a lifestyle difference. Wine drinkers will have a glass with dinner. Beer drinkers chug a six pack watching the game on Saturday.

      Bull packets. Wine drinkers will split a 750ml bottle between two people and recall in the morning that each had "a glass of wine". Beer drinkers will have a couple of rousing pints apiece and remember just that.

      Aside from the nuances of memory, the difference is that wine drinkers use metric units while beer drinkers use Imperial measure.

      (And a pox on those miserly American pints. I'd rather drink a French liter than a Merkin pint.)

    25. Re:Interesting.... by PylonHead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yea, but it's hard to beat main-lining heroin for a really good buzz to calorie ratio.

      --
      # (/.);;
      - : float -> float -> float =
    26. Re:Interesting.... by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      And, from what I've heard, beer is the preferred beverage with Indian food.

      Mmm.. time for a tablespoon of that insane hot tomato paste... ...to go with my beer of course.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    27. Re:Interesting.... by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Where the hell are you buying? At the local grocery store in Virginia I can buy a 12 pack of Coors or Bud Light for $7 or $8. And cheaper beer goes for maybe $4 or $5 for a 12 pack. Six packs $3-$5. I know the cost probably varies a lot from state to state, but either that must be some high quality beer or you are getting ripped off.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    28. Re:Interesting.... by suckmysav · · Score: 2, Funny

      "And, from what I've heard, beer is the preferred beverage with Indian food.

      Ha! For some Indian restaurants, vase water is a preferred beverage.

      "OMG! Get me a drink! NOW!"

      ;-)

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    29. Re:Interesting.... by killermookie · · Score: 1

      The health benefits of beer has been known for the past few years. Some have even mentioned that it's healthier than wine all together as it has a high concentration of the vitamin Bs, something the body doesn't usually get enough of. But that's usually only in the dark beers (porters and stouts). All you Bud, Coors, Miller and Michelob drinkers are losing out on the health benefits.

      Anyways, about the beer belly...

      What Really Causes Beer Bellies

      And I want to add, a Guinness has the same amount of calories as a light beer.

    30. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see a problem with his argument. I sat my ass on the couch last Sunday for around six hours watching football. I drank a pint of Sammy Smith's Oatmeal Stout, a sixpack of Dogfish Head Brewery 90 Minute IPA, and three Victory Hop Devil IPAs. Those are all around 8$(or more) a sixpack beers.

    31. Re:Interesting.... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it depends where on the world you live. A sixpack of decent pils cost about 3,40€. Of course, if you go for the fancy beers like Leffe, Duvel, Chimay, Chouffe (want me to go on?), then you'll pay more. However, usually, you don't drink a sixpack of any of those beers. None of those actually come in sixpacks ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    32. Re:Interesting.... by TheLink · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh. When I was in uni, I'd tell my vegan friend -"mmmm, dead animal corpse". It seems common in the west for people to not "know" that they are "eating dead animals" when they eat meat. In denial or something.

      I did point out he was eating candy that contained gelatine which was typically nonvegan. He just shrugged it off. Still it was in the UK so eating meat (esp beef) was probably risky - so he may have the last laugh yet (or I might be laughing mad with vCJD).

      Actually the evidence is that humans are very well suited to eating sea fish. It'll be easier for humans on a diet of fish and vegetables to be healthier and stronger than those on pure vegetarian diets (harder to pick the correct vegetables etc). Assuming nontoxic/pollution tainted fish+vege of course (unfortunately pollution is bad nowadays).

      --
    33. Re:Interesting.... by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a Taj Mahal goes great with INDIAN PIZZA! Nature's most perfect food.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    34. Re:Interesting.... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      _Some_ wine drinkers have a glass with dinner ... I tend to end up drinking the whole bottle once I open it. You know, a glass (or maybe two) while I'm cooking, then another glass (or maybe two) while I'm eating, then ... hey, it's _nearly_ empty (only a glass or two left), and it'll probably spoil if I don't drink it tonight ... Fortunately we have a lot of good, cheap, red wine in Australia (white wine is for sheilas and poofters, imo).

      I also like beer, btw, and mostly only drink my own.

      As an aside, you're unlikely to get a winegut because wine is generally more thoroughly fermented so there's far less residual sugar than beer.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    35. Re:Interesting.... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that stuff you're drinking isn't beer - it's lager. This is beer: http://www.bushys.com/

    36. Re:Interesting.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      When I was in uni, I'd tell my vegan friend -"mmmm, dead animal corpse". It seems common in the west for people to not "know" that they are "eating dead animals" when they eat meat.
      Even if you did media studies at one of the ex-polytechnics, I still think most of your classmates would know what pork is.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    37. Re:Interesting.... by cluke · · Score: 1

      Whenever your mouth has just gone into unexpected spice overload, water is the WORST thing you can drink, be it from a vase or not. I speak from experience! I had a balti turn from merely over-hot to something that almost made me cry when I drank a big glass of water to try to cool off.
      I'm sure there is some scientific reason for that! Milk is good to cool down.

    38. Re:Interesting.... by plumby · · Score: 1

      Are you somehow trying to suggest that Coors or Bud Light are good beers?

    39. Re:Interesting.... by canoe_head · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Lite beer...

      What do lite beer and having sex in a canoe have in common?

      They're fucking close to water.

    40. Re:Interesting.... by infolib · · Score: 2, Funny

      a minimum of 16 oz of beer per hour, which means three hours of drinking is the equivalent of a McDonalds extra-value meal.

      I can find those american "oz" and "calorie" units in my data book, but could you please convert "McDonalds extra-value meal" to the Système International? It's bad enough as it is.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    41. Re:Interesting.... by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      I'm suggesting they are high enough quality for the portion of the population we are talking about.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    42. Re:Interesting.... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      It seems common in the west for people to not "know" that they are "eating dead animals" when they eat meat.
      Even if you did media studies at one of the ex-polytechnics, I still think most of your classmates would know what pork is.
      I think you missed the point of the "know" comment. To many meat eaters in the West, they are no longer truely aware of what's involved in the killing and butchering of animals for foodstuffs. We no longer hunt or farm cows, pigs, and chickens, and have come to rely on factory farms and third parties for our animal flesh needs.

      There was a recent controvery regarding one of KFC's suppliers of chicken meat, which videos made of factory workers "abusing" the chickens in order to kill them. The minor scandal forced KFC to stop using that supplier, even though such "abuse" is common in the factory farming industry. "Out of sight, out of mind."

      Even the historical influences on American English helps to create the disconnect. We don't say that we eat "pig" or "cow." We eat "pork" and "beef." If you are at the dinner table and say "That's good pig!" you'd be though of as vulgar.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    43. Re:Interesting.... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Sure if you ask them they'd be able to tell you what pork is.

      But they don't really want to know what they are eating, so while they are eating it, they push that knowledge somewhere far away. e.g. Milk comes from a carton and pork comes from the supermarket.

      Many won't eat fish if it comes whole - it has to be fillet. Similar for chicken. If you set a whole roast pig in front of them - head and all, they won't eat the parts they'd normally eat anyway in isolated form.

      Some animal suffered and died, so they could have their tasty pork chop. They don't want to know that when a pig is slaughtered, often it actually cries while it dies. Some other animals are quite dumb so they may not know what is going on, but pigs are pretty intelligent.

      I do suppress that knowledge a bit too. But it is good to remind oneself regularly of what one is actually eating. So that when one wastes the food (doesn't eat it, or ruins it somehow), one has a greater realization of what one is doing.

      --
    44. Re:Interesting.... by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

      Obligatory quote:

      "Studies have also shown that herioine has no carbohydrates whatsoever. But it *does* contain lots of... heroine."
      --John Stewart, The Daily Show

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
    45. Re:Interesting.... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Abusing animals to kill them would render the animals unfit for sale in some countries - some religions require a particular slaughtering method.

      Here chicken (and other animals) is often eaten with minimal processing - not deboned, still recognizable as a chicken, so such abuse would often cause noticeable and unsightly bruising or even broken bones, reducing the value. Customers don't appreciate splintered/crushed bones. And if the chicken was not slaughtered correctly (at certified slaughterhouses) it would not be halal and thus unfit for 60+% of the market if not more.

      Making it common to treat food like fuel is a bad idea. It makes it easier for many evils to occur.

      There are many people who are allergic to certain foods, not because of the food itself, but because of what they feed the animals (or plants for that matter).

      BTW I'm surprised how many people are dangerously allergic to peanuts in the US (e.g. potentially fatal). Doesn't seem to be as big a problem here. Or in <a href="http://www.diynet.com/diy/lh_general_info/ar ticle/0,2041,DIY_14040_2275609,00.html">China</a&g t; for that matter. Is it the pesticides/chemicals used? Or as the article says- the method of preparation?

      --
    46. Re:Interesting.... by Paul+03244 · · Score: 1

      While you can buy many fine brews for $7-$8/six pack; and I do like a 'heavier' full-bodied beer as much as the next person, don't overlook Rolling Rock Pale Ale--a 'cheap' beer--no more expensive than Bud or Coors--but better tasting & can be had in NH for ~$4/six if you know where to shop.

      BTW, your L33t15t attitude is showing--your comment reads like you are saying that wine drinkers don't appreciate sporting events, or that beer drinkers are so intemperate that they can't have just one with a burger.

      Personally, I like beer *&* wine; with sporting events *and* food--but not at the same time.

    47. Re:Interesting.... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      Here [in China?] chicken (and other animals) is often eaten with minimal processing - not deboned, still recognizable as a chicken, so such abuse would often cause noticeable and unsightly bruising or even broken bones, reducing the value.

      A good point. I've always wondered why chicken in Oriental dishes seemed different in presentation than Western dishes. (Even though they would come from the same sources here in the States.) Chefs of Chinese or Indian food would more likely start with a whole chicken, rather than something processed.

      I've noticed that in China and India, the "outdoor market" is still a popular venue for shopping. (Though I might be working off a stereotype here.) Even the Western equivalent of the Butcher Shop and the Farmer's Market is fading away, as supermarkets and restaraunts continue to distance consumers away from food preparation.

      Making it common to treat food like fuel is a bad idea. It makes it easier for many evils to occur.

      Agreed. Just imagine if we USians start looking at food with same political lens as we look at oil. (-;

      I'm surprised how many people are dangerously allergic to peanuts in the US.

      I really liked that article you tried to link to; I used to live south of Toledo where the article was first published. If any of the conjecture in that is true, I anticipate are really nasty political fallout, since most of those trends were established in the name of "good health" by those here sometimes known as "Nutrition Nazis." We USians take what we eat way too seriously, while we continue to distance ourselves from the reality of it.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    48. Re:Interesting.... by Suidae · · Score: 1

      We don't say that we eat "pig" or "cow." We eat "pork" and "beef."

      Well, thats simply because 'pork' and 'beef' are words that describe the meat of hogs and cattle (generally not including organ meats, marrow, and other non-muscle parts). 'Pig' and 'cow' are the whole animals.

      I think 'eating a pig' is covered by the sexual deviancy laws in most states.

    49. Re:Interesting.... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      Well, thats simply because 'pork' and 'beef' are words that describe the meat of hogs and cattle... 'Pig' and 'cow' are the whole animals.

      Some linguists don't believe that was originally the case. I only have a Straight Dope cite handy, but "pig" and "pork" supposedly meant the same thing in the middle ages. Pig was of Anglo-Saxon decent, and pork was French. During one of France's political occupations of the British Isles, the native Anglo-Saxon language was percieved by French noblility as "crude" while French was considered proper fit speech. This lead to the introduction of connotations between the two word types; it was only in recent times that connotation became denotation, futher cementing Westerners' cognitive dissonance between food and its sources.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  6. A bit one-sided... by phaetonic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To quote from article, ...

    But the key is moderation. The researchers found three beers would have the opposite effect.

    The study was funded by beermakers Guinness and Labatt. But the university says the financial support had no influence on the outcome.

    1. Re:A bit one-sided... by Omega1045 · · Score: 4, Funny
      The researchers found three beers would have the opposite effect.

      So just make sure your two beers are both liters/quarts!

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    2. Re:A bit one-sided... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


      The study was funded by beermakers Guinness and Labatt


      Or was it, 'The study funded beermakers Guiness and Labatt'?

    3. Re:A bit one-sided... by Basehart · · Score: 1

      So the ideal number of beers is nine!

    4. Re:A bit one-sided... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      But the key is moderation. The researchers found three beers would have the opposite effect.

      WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that having your car wrapped around the trunk of a tree or overturned in a ditch may be harmful to your health. Drink in moderation and call a cab if you've had too much.
      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:A bit one-sided... by raider_red · · Score: 1, Troll

      It's not too one sided. If they were truly influenced by their financers, they wouldn't have added the note about moderation. It would be more like: "Beer's good for you! Drink as much as you can afford."

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    6. Re:A bit one-sided... by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 1

      Had you RTFA, you would have discovered that he was actually ASKED whether or not he was funded by a beer company. Had he said no, it would have been an out right lie and no one would believe his studies when word of this got out.

    7. Re:A bit one-sided... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      But the key is moderation. The researchers found three beers would have the opposite effect.

      Yeah, but those are canadian beers, right? That means you either drink a third of a german beer, or six american beers...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:A bit one-sided... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Nonononono! Too late! I'm already toasting! (*covers ears with two empty mugs*).

    9. Re:A bit one-sided... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      BZZZT!!! Wrong answer. They are required by law to make that statement, or something along similar lines.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    10. Re:A bit one-sided... by tipsymonkey · · Score: 1

      yeah 3 beers are bad, but did they test to see if 6? how about 12? i bet it turns good again around 12.

    11. Re:A bit one-sided... by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      I thought that the one-sided part was that it was done at Western...of course they would do anything to prove beer good!
      Of course, the fact that Labatt's is in London (where Western is) was the second thing that popped into my head

    12. Re:A bit one-sided... by ChuckSchwab · · Score: 0

      Had no effect?? What race would you have to be to believe that?

    13. Re:A bit one-sided... by Zardoz44 · · Score: 1
      You've never heard of Unibroue have you?

      La Terrible is just one of my favorites (10.5%). Check out their selection. The names and artwork alone give you an idea as to what you can expect.

      Of course, if you're drinking "Canadian", then you have my sympathies.

  7. yes, but define beer... by funny-jack · · Score: 5, Funny

    After the Great Britain Beer Festival, in London, all the brewery presidents decided to go out for a beer.
    The guy from Corona sits down and says, "Hey Senor, I would like the world's best beer, a Corona." The bartender dusts off a bottle from the shelf and gives it to him.
    The guy from Budweiser says, "I'd like the best beer in the world, give me 'The King Of Beers', a Budweiser." The bartender gives him one.
    The guy from Coors says, "I'd like the only beer made with Rocky Mountain spring water, give me a Coors." He gets it.
    The guy from Guinness sits down and says, "Give me a Coke." The bartender is a little taken aback, but gives him what he ordered.
    The other brewery presidents look over at him and ask "Why aren't you drinking a Guinness?" and the Guinness president replies, "Well, I figured if you guys aren't drinking beer, neither would I."

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
    1. Re:yes, but define beer... by savagedome · · Score: 5, Funny

      Alright. One more.

      A Texan walks into a pub in Ireland and clears his voice to the crowd of drinkers. He says, "I hear you Irish are a bunch of hard drinkers. I'll give $500 American dollars to anybody in here who can drink 10 pints of Guinness back-to-back." The room is quiet and no one takes up the Texan's offer.
      One man even leaves. Thirty minutes later the same gentleman who left shows back up and taps the Texan on the shoulder. "Is your bet still good?", asks the Irishman.
      The Texan says yes and asks the bartender to line up 10 pints of Guinness. Immediately the Irishman tears into all 10 of the pint glasses drinking them all back-to-back.
      The other pub patrons cheer as the Texan sits in amazement.
      The Texan gives the Irishman the $500 and says, "If ya don't mind me askin', where did you go for that 30 minutes you were gone?".
      The Irishman replies, "Oh...I had to go to the pub down the street to see if I could do it first".

    2. Re:yes, but define beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite amusing that here you karma-whored your way to a +5 by pointing out a ripped quote from Bash.org, yet you post a tired, cliched copy and paste joke here.

    3. Re:yes, but define beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comments moderated as "Funny" do not positively or negatively affect karma. Why don't you go and read the rules, ok?

    4. Re:yes, but define beer... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok, a couple of more, from here.

      An Englishman, a Scotsman and an Irishman each order a Guiness in a pub. Upon being served, each finds a fly in their beer. Repulsed, the Englishman sends his back. The Scotsman gently flicks the fly out of his mug and begins drinking. The Irishman, carefully lifts the fly up by its wings and screams, "Spit it out! Spit it out!"



      An Irishman walks into a bar and orders three glasses of Guiness, drinking them one at a time. Noticing this odd ritual, the bartender explains that the beer goes flat when poured and informs the man his beer would be much fresher if he ordered one glass at a time.

      The Irishman explains he began this custom with his two brothers, who have moved to America and Australia, respectively. This is their way of remembering all the time they spent drinking together.

      The man becomes a regular at the pub, well-known for always ordering three beers at once. One day he walks in and orders only two beers. Assuming the worst, a hush falls among other patrons.

      When the Irishman returns to the bar to order his second round, the bartender quietly offers his condolences. The man looks confused for a moment, and then explains, "No, everyone's fine. I gave up beer for lent."

    5. Re:yes, but define beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Note that being moderated Funny doesn't help your karma. You have to be smart, not just a smart-ass."

      Let alone the fact that one post would hardly affect one's overall karma. What I find funny is that you are apparently jealous of someone who posted a joke and was the first comment to be moderated up to +5.

    6. Re:yes, but define beer... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Informative
      The odd thing is, that most people at the GBBF wouldn't drink Guinness.

      It's not a "Real Ale", at least not here in the UK. Given the choice, most CAMRA members would choose something better.

    7. Re:yes, but define beer... by seanmckay · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't drink it either, and I live in the US. Quite a few americans are obsessed with the stuff, I think it's wretched. Of course, it helps that I get free beer from work. It's good to be the brewer.

    8. Re:yes, but define beer... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I prefer Belgian beers these days. Guinness is nice when it's stored/served properly but when it's crap it tastes like battery acid (I went to the US once and had one at the epcot center at the cheesy 'british' pub... it made me physically sick (really). I waited till I got back to blighty before trying that again....)

    9. Re:yes, but define beer... by pellis23 · · Score: 1

      Q:What does drinking Budweiser have in common with having sex in a canoe?

      A:They're both fucking close to water.

    10. Re:yes, but define beer... by kavau · · Score: 2, Informative
      "I'd like the best beer in the world, give me 'The King Of Beers', a Budweiser."

      Actually, Budweiser truly deserves the title 'King Of Beers'. Not the American version, though. I'm talking about the original!

      Mmmmm.... Budweiser....

    11. Re:yes, but define beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Englishman, a German, and a Irishman walk into a bar together, and they all order a pint. Just as the beers make the table, a fly lands in each of the drinker's cup. The Englishman clears his throat and says: "erm, bartender, could you draw me another beer, this one has a fly in it". The German scoops out the beer and starts drinking his. The Irishman reaches in his cup, grabs the fly by the wings, holds the fly up over the beer, and shouts: "Spit it out!"

    12. Re:yes, but define beer... by hattig · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why drink Guinness when you have Skullsplitter (9%) and Russian Stoat (11%) to drink instead by the pint! Well, half pint after some incidents ...

    13. Re:yes, but define beer... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      There's lots of other lovely stouts and porters that a lot lower alcohol.

    14. Re:yes, but define beer... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      If you ever get to the UK, you could get yourself on a brewery tour or people from Camra would gladly advise you on where to drink.

    15. Re:yes, but define beer... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I believe that Budvar is now owned by Anheiser-Busch. Pity. Unfortunately, consolidation amongst brewers is as bad as in any other industry - most famous beers are just brands of $ENORMOUS_CORPORATION now.

    16. Re:yes, but define beer... by kavau · · Score: 1
      When googling around, you'll actually find that the trademark battle between the two is still fully raging. But a takeover is certainly a threat if Budvar gets fully privatized.

      The details of the trademark war are actually quite amusing:

      Anheuser-Busch traces its history to German emigrants, and has been brewing a "Budweiser" beer since 1876.

      The Czech Budvar brewery says that "Budweiser" beer from Ceske Budejovice was exported to the United States as early as 1872.

    17. Re:yes, but define beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, have great taste! congrats. Have a Palm.

    18. Re:yes, but define beer... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      An Englishman, a Scotsman and an Irishman each order a Guiness in a pub. Upon being served, each finds a fly in their beer. Repulsed, the Englishman sends his back. The Scotsman gently flicks the fly out of his mug and begins drinking. The Irishman, carefully lifts the fly up by its wings and screams, "Spit it out! Spit it out!"

      I love this joke. I had to explain it (actually, the whisky version of the joke) on a newsgroup, i.e. the stereotypes of the Scotsman as thrifty and the Irishman as a drinker, and I was at a loss to concisely describe the stereotypical Englishman. Fortunately an actual Englishman responded to my post, chiding me for misspelling "whisky".

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
  8. The big difference? by mveloso · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes, beer is very much better than running windows under linux? /obligatory

  9. Let the drinking begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the last thing those college boys need to hear.

  10. Related story... by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Smashing your head into a wall while taking steroids is as healthy as professional football!

    --

    Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
  11. I wonder by Kortec · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    if the Nation of Ireland will be sober enough to celebrate when they hear the news..

    --
    "My heart is in the work." - Andrew Carnegie
  12. Beer Is Liquid Bread by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    It's good for you, We like to drink 'till we spew! OOOH! Who cares if we get fat? I'll drink to that. Oh, what is the malten liquor? What gets you drunker quicker? What comes in bottles or in cans? BEER!

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  13. To quote the article in the wrong manner... by SafarimanPE · · Score: 2, Funny

    "how beer helps police..."

    1. Re:To quote the article in the wrong manner... by logic+hack · · Score: 0

      I assume the article was written in Solviet Russia.

  14. And yet... by ajiva · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course if you walk for 30 minutes every day, you'll get at least the same benefits if not more.

    1. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case....
      Go for the win-win.
      15min Walk to the pub
      a beer, a social chat.
      15min walk back to home or place of work.

      It's all good for you.

    2. Re:And yet... by the_denman · · Score: 1

      what if you walk for 30 minutes right after drinking your beer, would you get double the benifits or just public intox?

  15. who comissioned the study. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beer makers say, buy more beer!

  16. Sponsor by MyosinII · · Score: 0

    ...this WAS sponsored by the beer companies.

    --
    Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase
  17. Excellent. by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

    We can now rest assured that Homer Simpson will be cancer-free.

  18. Stallman's response by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 2, Funny

    free? as in radicals policed by beer?

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  19. Conrimfming thiss study by I+Love+this+Company! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pfft. Mostt of uzsd hav knonnnw bou)t this fofr yeawrs!!@

    --

    "All art is quite useless." -- Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Conrimfming thiss study by shfted! · · Score: 1

      It looks like Microsoft is letting its coders post on slashdot again! Lookout!

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
  20. ok, I'm outta here! by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Happy hour here I come!

    Seriously though, I've always wanted to start drinking a glass of wine or beer with lunch at work. Think about it long term; it would be a health benefit. One beer isn't going to make anyone loopy, and you'd be at your desk or in the kitchen, so you wouldn't be going outside like smokers, plus you'd only do it once a day unlike smokers.

    Hmmm...perhaps I should send this article to our HR department...

    CB!@#$%^&*

    1. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by xlark · · Score: 1

      The big trouble is having just one.

    2. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by Peyna · · Score: 1

      There has to be somewhere within walking distance that you can get a beer on your lunch break.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by shfted! · · Score: 1

      We run a small computer repair shop and internet cafe. We've pondered selling alcohol here, but then we couldn't allow minors in. I think internet in a pub-like atmosphere would be great -- and not just for sneaking a Guinness in here and there.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    4. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by switcha · · Score: 1

      Come work at my place. We have a kegerator in the lunch room. Open all day.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    5. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh!

      We used to have free beer & snacks at work every fridays. It was awesome.

      This policy is not in place anymore. Apparently some girl in Ontario sued her employer because she crashed her car after a Christmas party, and our company is not able to take all the steps to make sure employees dont drink and drive.

    6. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by flink · · Score: 1

      Is there some law about that where you live? I remember going to all-ages shows at bars in Boston when I was in high school and they would just put an X on your hand. Sadly, the practice seems to have stopped.

    7. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by pkhuong · · Score: 1

      Ask for ID before _selling_ (optionally, stamp adults' hands to make it quicker), not on entry. Resturants & pubs can have minors if they don't drink - why couldn't you?

      --
      Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
    8. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by kavau · · Score: 1
      Seriously though, I've always wanted to start drinking a glass of wine or beer with lunch at work. Think about it long term; it would be a health benefit. One beer isn't going to make anyone loopy, and you'd be at your desk or in the kitchen, so you wouldn't be going outside like smokers, plus you'd only do it once a day unlike smokers.

      I know I wouldn't be productive after a glass of wine anymore - the slack-off reflex would take over immediately. But out of curiosity: what would your boss say if you really started drinking a glass of wine a day at work? Not your boss in particular, but generally here in the US (if you're not in the US, forgive my insolence).

      I'm asking because it would be quite acceptable in many places in Europe, but I'm not so sure about the US.

    9. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by durdur · · Score: 1

      Move to Germany. This is standard operating procedure over there: no decent employee cafeteria is lacking beer.

    10. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      Most Friday's, I have a beer at lunch with my boss and his boss. We get plenty done on Friday afternoons too.

      ah, the joy of being back at a start up again! (and this one makes money!)

    11. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      MY company actually had been semi-regularly having office celebrations, at which alcohol was served, after which we went back to work, when I began work over three years ago.

      In an office environment, there's no real reason not to allow a moderate (i.e., not inebreating) ammount of alcohol.

    12. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Places that do that seem to be either lazy or concerned that minors would get their hands stamped somehow (aka by a employee who doesnt give a shit and/or knows the minor) and get in BIG trouble if it were ever found out by the police

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    13. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by slashrogue · · Score: 1

      Every now and then (maybe two or three times a week, though sometimes I don't do it at all in a given week) when I go out for lunch at work I order a 32 oz. of Bud Light cuz it's cheap and gives me a bit of a buzz. The only downside is that I always seem to get more tired than usual after lunch if I have a beer. I go for the 32 oz. because it's like $3.25 and a bottle is almost as expensive, and one bottle wouldn't give me a buzz.

    14. Re:ok, I'm outta here! by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

      that's always been my point, in europe it wouldn't be a problem, but here...well, it's unknown. hey, we have beer every other fridays now (after my sugestion, nice to have a cool workplace) but just a beer or glass of wine at lunch...still, unknown.

      I think I'm going to buy some of those 4 packs of red wine and just have a glass for lunch.

      CB

  21. What they didn't say... by SteroidMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    1 drink of wine = 1 glass 1 drink of beer = 1 pony keg. I personally prefer the weight of the glass, but some may prefer the durability of the keg. But really a pint of beer vs. a glass of wine is hardly comparable at least from a calorie standpoint.

  22. I love beer but.. by RobPiano · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I think the reason wine drinkers are healthier than beer drinkers remains consistent. Wine has fewer calories, so you don't get as fat. As a general rule, wine drinkers have healthier weights than beer drinkers.

    1. Re:I love beer but.. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      Here's a comparison. If you look at the calories per serving line, you'll see why I skip Wine and Beer and go right to hard liquor (preferably straight up or on the rocks.

    2. Re:I love beer but.. by servognome · · Score: 1

      It also has to do with the food that accompanies the drink. "Beer 'n' wings" vs. "Wine and Cheese"

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    3. Re:I love beer but.. by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      It also has to do with the food that accompanies the drink. "Beer 'n' wings" vs. "Wine and Cheese"

      Uh, have you ever looked at the fat & calorie content in most cheeses?!

      Personally I think the reason wine drinkers fare better is because they're less likely to drink to excess. Not only is wine culture geared more toward moderation, but wine itself has some properties that discourage heavy consumption. Wine generally has a stronger flavor than your average (American) beer. It's also known to give a lot of people nasty headaches/hangovers. And perhaps most importantly, it's not packaged in convenient aluminum containers :)

    4. Re:I love beer but.. by servognome · · Score: 1

      Uh, have you ever looked at the fat & calorie content in most cheeses?!
      Most cheeses have high fat & calorie content, but the amount you eat (or can even stand to eat) is small. A couple of little cubes on a stick, maybe a couple crackers and a piece of bread and you're done. As opposed to a couple dozen wings, some nachos, and chili cheese fries.
      Wine generally has a stronger flavor than your average (American) beer.
      American beer has flavor? :)
      And perhaps most importantly, it's not packaged in convenient aluminum containers
      Boxed wine is always convenient

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    5. Re:I love beer but.. by colinferm · · Score: 1

      Personally I think the reason wine drinkers fare better is because they're less likely to drink to excess.

      Says you.

      There was about a six month period that I was drinking two bottles of not bad French AC wine a night. And this is while I was still doing one of the largest projects I've ever coded. Living in New York means you can pretty much drink as much as you want though, as long as you can pay the rent.

      Ahem... of course... I got a little thicker through the middle than I would have liked from all the drunken lying around DVD watching, so now I'm drinking *maybe* a glass a night and at the damned gym every morning. I hate not drinking but I hate being fat even more, so... the answer became obvious after a point.

  23. Guinness really is good for you by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Guinness really is good for you by idlemind · · Score: 1

      My friend knew someone in college who lived off of Guiness and vitamin pills for a month

  24. And wine was already as good as... by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

    Red Grape Juice. I lack propper sources, but apparently red grape juice is just as good with the free radicals as wine was found to be.

    At the RNC they used pepper spray and riot gear to police the free radicals. and then they put them in jail, which made them imprisoned radicals...aka the opposite of free.

    --
    SPAM
    1. Re:And wine was already as good as... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Red Grape Juice. I lack propper sources, but apparently red grape juice is just as good with the free radicals as wine was found to be.

      That's because Red Grape Juice, when it's 100% juice, is just red wine that's been pasteurized to kill the yeast and boil off the alcohol.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:And wine was already as good as... by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      Red Grape Juice. I lack propper sources, but apparently red grape juice is just as good with the free radicals as wine was found to be.

      However, one alcoholic drink per day (12 oz beer, 5 oz wine) has been shown to increase insulin sensitivity, which may be a good thing if you have a family history of adult-onset diabetes.

    3. Re:And wine was already as good as... by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      Red Grape Juice. I lack propper sources, but apparently red grape juice is just as good with the free radicals as wine was found to be.

      I thought this was a great idea until I realized that grape juice plus vodka is still more expensive than those box-o-wine deals for $11. I'd like to see some debate over the sulfites in wine. It would be interesting to see if grape juice plus vodka is actually better than wine, due to the lack of preservatives.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  25. Rationalization to drink! by jatencio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I see these studies, I also pause and wonder whether these scientist are trying to rationalize their beer/wine intake. If their wives or husbands get after them for wanting their "one" drink-a-day, they can point to their studies and say that science proves that this is good for me!
    Of course, drinking is moderation is good, too much of anything may be harmful. At least that has been my experience. All this article does in reinforce little but of knowledge.
    Jonathan

    1. Re:Rationalization to drink! by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Of course, drinking is moderation is good

      At least that's what the drunks among us would like us to believe. Not to mention their drug suppliers.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  26. You guessed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cue the insults about beer from countries you don't like.

  27. If one beer is good, then... by punxking · · Score: 2, Funny

    'We were very surprised one drink of beer or stout contributed an equal amount of antioxidant benefit as wine"

    Further, after about 4 or 5 more beers, who cares!

    --
    You can have my cynical agnosticism when you pry it from my cold, dead logic.
  28. Better question: by temojen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you trust Labatts with this "science"?

    1. Re:Better question: by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes- if their funding had actually affected the outcome, there wouldn't have been word one about moderation in the article.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Better question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you trust Labatts with this "beer"?

    3. Re:Better question: by McCrapDeluxe · · Score: 1

      Just like if alcohol companies had any influence on alcohol ads, there wouldn't be word one about moderation in them?

    4. Re:Better question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "drink in moderation" warnings in the ads are state-mandated. They also don't mention specific quantities of beer.

      This study suggests that you only drink [b]one[/b] beer in a day, and that more is bad for you. This isn't exactly profitable for companies that want you drinking as much as is humanly possible without killing yourself.

    5. Re:Better question: by SB5 · · Score: 1
      Do you trust Labatts with this "science"?


      Why wouldn't I? Its not like they make beer!
      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    6. Re:Better question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Yes, I do.

  29. I raise my mug by mbrewthx · · Score: 0

    In celebration for all of us named Brewer...

    Mon - Beer
    Tues - wine
    Wed - Beer
    Thurs - WIne
    Fri - Wine with diner - beer with a movie
    Sat -Beer all day
    Sun - Beer w/football

    --
    __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
  30. well... by schnits0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    With beer being healthy for you, and recent studies showed that mice who became under the influence of pot had less cancer growth...I'm glad to say I live a healthy life style.

  31. Well heck! by Krypto420 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess that means I'll live to be 100!!! Excuse me while I crack open another cold one!! WooHoo!

    1. Re:Well heck! by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

      "Excuse me while I crack open another cold one!! WooHoo!"

      You're a geriatric necrophile? =)

    2. Re:Well heck! by Krypto420 · · Score: 1
      You're a geriatric necrophile? =)

      It took me a minute to get it............... HA!.............. if I didn't already post I'd have modded you up! ;)

  32. Incorrectly worded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how beer helps police harmful free radicals in blood


    I think the article meant to say: how beer helps police harm radicals for free
  33. I thought this has been known... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Several years ago, my grandfather was diagnosed with prostate cancer. Luckily the chemo-therapy beat it down and it hasn't returned.

    Anyway, the point is when he was recovering, the doctor asked him about his life-style. My grandfather, a wine-drinker, answered a solid "NO" when asked if he drank beer. The doctor recommended that he change that and start drinking a beer per day.

    The doctor was under belief a beer per day would keep the prostate cancer from returning, and it (among other things) seems to have worked. My grandfather celebrated his 80th a few years ago and is still going strong.

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    1. Re:I thought this has been known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Heh. That's probably because beer depresses testosterone levels and fatty tissue promotes oestrogen release, hence causing the prostate to shrink!

    2. Re:I thought this has been known... by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 2, Funny

      I feel a Woody Allen movie citation coming on...

    3. Re:I thought this has been known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad recently was diagnosed with Parkinsons disease (I really hope it goes away) and the doctor recommended he drink a glass of wine or beer a day. Before then he only drank a 6-pack of longnecks once during the Christmas holiday.

    4. Re:I thought this has been known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had my first ever healthcheck (free from work) a few months ago, and the only thing the doctor recommended to me was to drink MORE alchohol. He recommended 7-14 units a week, and said you could have up to 21 units before the bad effects outweighed the good (for men).

      The problem is, if i start drinking a berr a night i'm gonna need to do a heck of a lot more exercise to not pork out.

  34. but what about the side effects... by DaFallus · · Score: 0

    studies have shown can help prevent the oxidation of blood plasma by toxic-free radicals that trigger many aging diseases, including cancer, diabetes, heart disease and cataracts Its amazing how scientists claim that beer can help prevent cancer, diabetes, and heart disease, but they fail to mention the harmful side effects, such as sclerosis of the liver, beer goggles, and sometimes even the dreaded "whiskey-dick".

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  35. Yes! by Dr.+Mojura · · Score: 1
    Researchers at The University of Western Ontario have found one drink of beer or wine provides equivalent increases in plasma antioxidant activity, which helps prevent the oxidization of blood plasma by toxic free radicals that trigger many aging diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, heart disease and cataracts.

    I'll drink to that!!
    (many apologies...)
    --
    "Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion." - Democritus
  36. Now I can tell my wife... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    I'm not trying to get drunk! I'm looking after my health damn it!

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  37. I knew it! by blizatrex · · Score: 1

    So Ben Franklin was right; beer is the drink of the gods.

    --
    "We can dance if we want to, we can leave your friends behind. Cause your friends don't dance and if they don't dance.
  38. Richard Stallman by raider_red · · Score: 1

    So does this mean that free as in beer can now be almost as good as free as in speech?

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  39. Re:Incorrectly worded (obligatory Simpsons) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Works on Contingency?

    No, Money Down!

  40. Some Good Qualities != Healthy by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 5, Informative

    It may have as many antioxidants, but it also has a hell of a lot more carbs. If you REALLY want to get a lot of antioxidants, try blueberries instead. All the good stuff, little of the bad.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Some Good Qualities != Healthy by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1
      A fair number of studies have shown that drinking in moderation has a positive effect on health.

      As for the carbs, well, if your total caloric intake is under control then who the hell cares? People lose weight on low-carb diets because they tend to eat fewer total calories. It isn't the carbs themselves that are harmful.

    2. Re:Some Good Qualities != Healthy by Jonner · · Score: 1

      What I've read and heard about the typical low carb diets is that they allow people to lose weight without restricting total calories. That's why they're so popular, because people don't have to limit how much they eat as much as on a low-calorie diet.

      Of course carbohydrates aren't harmful. They're no more harmful than fat, protein, salt, or any other essential nutrients. Any of those can be harmful in excess.

  41. Don't get too excited by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny
    According to the summary, the benefit to health comes with a corresponding decrease in civil liberties:

    For more info on how beer helps police harmful free radicals in blood...

    It's time to write your representatives, folks!

    1. Re:Don't get too excited by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm all for policing the radicals. They're the crazy bastards that make vague laws necessary in the first place.

    2. Re:Don't get too excited by jhemmila · · Score: 1

      I had to read that 3 times to figure out that "police" was being used as a verb, and "free" as an adjective, not vice-versa.

  42. Please define it by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    1, 2, 3, 4 I declare a beer war.

    Seeing as how Guiness Draught has the lowest alcohol content of the beers in the cliche joke, and therefore would be the least likely to make me drunk, why would I want to drink it? To avoid jokes from poser beer elitests?

    1. Re:Please define it by cephyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the definition of a real beer isn't always about its alcohol content.

      now go out and get some chimay.

      --
      Moo.
    2. Re:Please define it by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      If getting drunk is your only reason for drinking, why not just get some grain alchohol in a 2L plastic bottle and drink that?

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    3. Re:Please define it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because it doesn't taste and look like urine? [Yes I know what urine tastes like, so sue me: a bit like Budweiser, only less fucking ricey.]

    4. Re:Please define it by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      This is interesting - the first response advocates Chimay, which I enjoy now and again.
      The second advocates grain alcohol, which I consume frequently.

      Can't we all just get along?

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    5. Re:Please define it by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The darker the beer, the more good stuff it has in it and the less watered down it is. Beer is NOT about the alcohol- that's just a preservative for the rest of the ingredients. It's also not about the water (sorry Coors). It's about the grains and yeasts and barley. Now if you want the only beer better tha Guiness- go get yourself a bottle of Marmite. It's made from the stuff left over in the bottom of the Guiness barrel...

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Please define it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Christ on a crutch, DON'T get yourself any marmite. Are you trying to kill people? Marmite: The Food of the Damned.

      Actually, there are plenty of beers better than guinness.

      Corporate Stouts in Ireland include Murphys, Beamish - they're arguably not better or worse than guinness, just different and not widely available outside Ireland + the UK.

      In a microbrewery pub in Dublin, they sell stout brewed with oysters (yes, shellfish in your beer!). It kicks guinness' arse around the block.

    7. Re:Please define it by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes I know what urine tastes like

      Hey, are you that Alaskan who stuck his tongue to a frozen flagpole?

    8. Re:Please define it by shfted! · · Score: 1

      It's about taste and flavour, which is why real geeks prefer Guinness. =)

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    9. Re:Please define it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you like guinness (or don't like guinness) but/and would prefer a beer which doesn't take smoky, try Old Rasputin stout. It comes out of California so you might not be able to find it everywhere but it's fantastic.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Please define it by shfted! · · Score: 1

      That would be an import for me up here in Canada, but if I see it, I'll give it a shot. Thanks for the advice :)

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    11. Re:Please define it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For reference: http://www.ratebeer.com/Ratings/Beer/Beer-Ratings. asp?BeerID=11379

      And no, it doesn't taste of fish. It's rather surprising, but good.

    12. Re:Please define it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For more reference http://www.beeradvocate.com/beer/rate_results/656/ 5686/

      I like this review:

      This stout is one of the most complex and addicting that I have ever experienced. I was fortunate enough to be able to drink this from the Porterhous in Dublin while I was living there...

      Very smooth, with a complex and distinct taste and smell. The first time I drank it, I could only compare it to a mixture of orange peels and WD 40. Sounds pretty brutal, but I just had to keep drinking it. I couldn't stop. It was that good.

      I recommend this stout to everyone who appreciates a complex yet smooth stout. This one has no rivals, and there is nothing similar.


    13. Re:Please define it by iroll · · Score: 1

      Murphys and Beamish are widely available in Phoenix, Arizona, USA, both on tap and in bottles (I believe... I know I've seen them both on tap). Now, whether or not its still as good after travelling 4000 miles... (Or for that matter, it may have been brewed here under license; I've no idea).

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    14. Re:Please define it by pclminion · · Score: 1
      now go out and get some chimay.

      I agree, but you should at least mention the cost -- at least $6 a bottle around here at least.

    15. Re:Please define it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled "Vodka".

    16. Re:Please define it by steve_bedrick · · Score: 2, Informative
      Incidentally, this particular beer is, besides being amazingly tasty, excellent for cooking with. I find that it works well as a base for chili. I'd initially thought to use Guiness, but found that it seemed to make the chili a little bit too heavy, and its flavor kind of took over the whole thing. Old Rasputin contributes excellent flavor without too much body. Just about right for chili. :-)

      Also good for chili is Black Butte Porter, from Deschutes Brewing. It might be tough to get ahold of outside of Oregon, though- I'm not sure what their distribution is like.

    17. Re:Please define it by 1967+Ferrari+312 · · Score: 1

      One should also mention that there are 6 kinds of Chimay. The really good stuff comes in a 750ml bottle (with a cork) and is called Grande Réserve. Richard.

    18. Re:Please define it by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      Yes I know what urine tastes like, so sue me: a bit like Budweiser, only less fucking ricey.

      Unless, presumably, the urinator has recently eaten a lot of fucking rice.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    19. Re:Please define it by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Marmite: vegemite on a hangover...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    20. Re:Please define it by ebbe11 · · Score: 1
      The really good stuff comes in a 750ml bottle (with a cork) and is called Grande Réserve

      And it is even better when it is aged for a couple of years.

      Another excellent beer is "La Fin Du Monde" (The End of the World) from UNIBROUE in Quebec. Their brewmaster used to work for Chimay...

      --

      My opinion? See above.
  43. Proof of God? Franklin thought so. by Exousia · · Score: 5, Funny

    As Benjamin Franklin said, "Beer is proof that there is a God and that He loves us."

    I couldn't agree more.

    --

    --Slashdot: News for Turds. Stuff that Splatters.
    1. Re:Proof of God? Franklin thought so. by Bequita · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then Guinness is proof that the Irish are His chosen people....

      --
      Yes, there are women on Slashdot. Deal with it.
    2. Re:Proof of God? Franklin thought so. by atcurtis · · Score: 1

      Mr Franklin said a lot of things...

      He was a member of the Hellfire Club which resided in an artifical cave in High Wycombe, England - an exclusive gentleman's club where no wives were allowed yet women were frequently admitted... where he famously gave advice to other gentlemen on how to choose a mistress.

      --
      -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
      -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
    3. Re:Proof of God? Franklin thought so. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I dunno - I think Guinness is mainly marketing hype. I've had much better stouts, including one brewed locally (Bushy's Oyster Stout - http://www.bushys.com/). I find Guinness has a sort of 'burnt taste' to it. Before you ask, yes I have drunk it in Ireland.

  44. Healty drunk! by Leoric · · Score: 1

    Nice! Now I can drink a bottle of wine and a 6pack of beer, and get drunk the healty way!

    Take that! Doc!

  45. Homer says it best by whovian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "To alcohol! The cause of -- and solution to -- all of life's problems."

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    1. Re:Homer says it best by unformed · · Score: 1

      I would kill a family of eight for a drop of sweet beer.

    2. Re:Homer says it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would kill a busload of orphans saved from abusive foster parents for a drop of sweet beer.

  46. Don't forget the psychological effect by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

    If you're stressed out, and a beer helps you relax at the end of a day, that stress-removal is a positive health effect in itself.

  47. Do we really want... by uberdave · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do we really want beer helping the police to free harmful radicals?

    1. Re:Do we really want... by nastro · · Score: 1

      In blood, no less. Sweet Christ, what are we doing?

    2. Re:Do we really want... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

      Mumia will be relieved.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    3. Re:Do we really want... by Frankie70 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do we really want beer helping the police to free harmful radicals?


      "Either you are with us or with the radicals"
      - Arthur W Guinness
      ( Sept 13 1759 )

    4. Re:Do we really want... by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

      Keep drinking...

      Do we really want radical police helping to free harmful beer?

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
  48. Many other health benefits by i0n · · Score: 5, Informative

    Beer has a lot more to offer than just antioxidants, especially when you drink unfiltered homebrew/craft beers. For one, there's a ton of fiber (I've heard 5g/12oz quoted (too lazy to confirm)) which is good considering that most of us dont get near the recommended amount (~25g/day I think). Also, unfiltered beer contains a considerable amount of yeast (no, not just on the bottom, suspended too) which has tons of vitamin B12 (ever seen 'brewers yeast' at the health food store). I've heard also that lack of B12 is one of the main causes of hangovers - to this day, I've never had a (bad) hangover drinking my own beer.

    --
    "Moltar, I have a giant brain that is capable of reducing any complex machine into a simple yes or no answer."
    1. Re:Many other health benefits by toxic666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amen.

      I brew my own, too, and always have some hefeweizen on hand. A wonderful, fruity wheat beer loaded with protien chill haze. And I find the mandatory suspended yeast (mit hefe, bitte!) is better than fiber.

    2. Re:Many other health benefits by base_chakra · · Score: 1

      Beer has a lot more to offer than just antioxidants...

      So does wine, but the respective benefits of each aren't all shared; so it's rather misleading for the author to proclaim "Beer Found to be as Healthy as Wine". A popular example of wine's healthfulness is the French paradox, well known among oenophiles.

    3. Re:Many other health benefits by kavau · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      That's why I prefer Bavarian beer... Hefeweizen, or Weissbier, as we call it. Since I was born in Bavaria, I'm probably a little biased when it comes to beer, but after drinking larger quantities of American beer I regularly wake up with a bad headache the next morning. After comparable quantities of Bavarian beer I feel fine, even though it's slightly stronger (the beer, not the headache). The difference might well be due to the yeast, as you suggest.

      Prost!

    4. Re:Many other health benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, ok, I'll have a glass of wine and a pint of beer everyday... and I shot of Canadian Club for good measure.

    5. Re:Many other health benefits by div_2n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dehydration. Vitamin deficiencies make it feel worse or so I have heard.

    6. Re:Many other health benefits by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I think I may get a sixer of Hefeweizen at the supermarket for drinking this weekend...could you throw out a few brands that are worth trying? I've no guarantee i'll be able to find them here (east coast US) but I know the market i get beer at HAS at least two labels of that variety.

      I bought some last week labeled "wheat beer" that was unfilterd and cloudy...is that the same sort of thing?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    7. Re:Many other health benefits by shplorb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I've heard also that lack of B12 is one of the main causes of hangovers - to this day, I've never had a (bad) hangover drinking my own beer.

      Hangovers are actually caused by dehydration. Alcohol is a diuretic like caffiene - it makes you piss. If you don't have a glass of water every now and then whilst drinking you dehyrdate, but don't notice it because you're drunk. =]

      Whenever I have a session I try to drink as much water or cordial as I can before going to sleep and I never have a hangover.

      Puking your guts up before drinking water will also help, since you won't be absorbing alcohol into your bloodstream whilst you sleep, so drink up! =]

    8. Re:Many other health benefits by kavau · · Score: 1
      My favorite brands that are available in US are Franziskaner and Schneider-Weisse. I know you can get them in California in various big-chain supermarkets, but I don't know about the East Coast. Not as good, but still good is Spaten. I can't remember any more brands I've seen sold in US. Stay away from Löwenbräu, since it's brewed in the US and not the real thing.

      Hefeweizen comes in three types actually: white, dark, and "clear" (that is, filtered). Your unfiltered wheat beer is (or at least wants to be) a Hefeweizen, too. If you ask me, none of the US-brewed Hefeweizens come close to the original taste, but I fully admit that I'm a beer snob ;-)

    9. Re:Many other health benefits by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a beer snob too ;) only my tastes usually run towards stouts and porters (However I'm willing to experiment, I usually buy a different sixer each weekend)

      The wheat beer i bought was Sierra Nevada, I wasn't expecting to be wow'd by its taste, I've had SN brew before and while interesting, I don't consider it really exemplary of the various styles they do (a porter, IPA, etc)

      If you care to grab my AIM screenname from my profile and we can chat about it instead of going back and forth here =)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    10. Re:Many other health benefits by wrook · · Score: 1

      Others to try are Hacker-Pschorr and Bamberger. I would say the Hacker-Pschorr is my favorite, Bamberger a close second, Schieder-Weiss third. When I visited Germany 15 years ago I really liked the Loewenbraeu, but as the other respondant said it might not be that good if it's brewed in the US.

      Just be aware that this beer will taste *different* than what you're used to. It's got a flavour of bananas and cloves (more of one or the other depending on brand). This flavour comes from the special yeast they use (wheat itself has a pretty neutral flavour).

      If you really want to go whole hog, get your self some nice german bratwurst and saurkraut to go with the beer. This is a beer that screams to be paired with food.

    11. Re:Many other health benefits by pyite · · Score: 1

      I've recently been on a wheat beer kick. I can vouch for Franziskaner, it's quite good. Tonight I had a bottle of Saranac's Belgian White, which while drinkable, was not very pronounced in flavor. One of my American brewed favorites is Harpoon's Unfiltered Offering. Also, I had Brooklyner Weisse on tap in Brooklyn this past weekend and it was very flavorful.

      On another note, spending a week in Mexico, I became addicted to Negra Modelo--WITHOUT a lime. I find it quite refreshing and enjoyable as a "have a couple" beer.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    12. Re:Many other health benefits by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I've had some various Sarnacs (think they do a sampler pack or something?) and found them okay but not GREAt..may give the belgian white a try though

      ALso know i can get the Harpoon around here, wasn't sure its repute either

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    13. Re:Many other health benefits by pyite · · Score: 1

      Yea, I've had the sampler before, without the wheat in it, which is why I bought a whole six of the wheat. If I had to choose between the Saranac and the Harpoon for a wheat, I would definitely go for the Saranac.

      Can't wait til I get around to building my kegerator, though. Homebrew on tap is going to be the end of my college career. However, I think a few pints will allow me to approach engineering problems from a new "angle."

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    14. Re:Many other health benefits by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      oh Geebus if i could get Guinness on tap in my apartment...having that on tap for the first time (irish pub opened back home) almost made me quit drinking beer out of a bottle, the experience was so differnet (better...)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    15. Re:Many other health benefits by pyite · · Score: 1

      Yea, there are plenty of places around me that have it on tap, unfortunately my body has not completed enough rotations around the Sun to be allowed to visit such places. Silly if you think about it, I (being under 21) can legally purchase all the things to make beer, yet at some instant in time, what's in the fermenter becomes illegal for me to possess. Yet plenty of people I know over 21 still like to drink obscene amounts of piss beer. It really bothers me when I see that.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    16. Re:Many other health benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pure vodka (not mixed with anything) even in large quantities doesn't cause bad hangovers either, but I don't think that there is B12 in vodka anyway.
      Of course any vodka except Polish or Russian origin plainly sucks.

    17. Re:Many other health benefits by texas · · Score: 1

      Here in Virginia, I can find Erdinger and Weihenstephaner weissbier quite regularly at the big box supermakets.

      A good local (mid-Atlantic) weiss comes from the Weeping Radish brewery in Manteo, NC (outer banks area). The proprietor is from Germany, and adheres to the Reinheitsegebot (sp?... German beer purity law). If you're ever there in person, you can even get it unpastureized (have to keep it cold, though), although I'm not convinced there is much difference in taste.

      The one that seems most easy to find though, is Widmer Bros, which you can even find on tap at a lot of bars. A lot of folks like that one, but I'm not a fan.

      --
      Hey, how'd you know I was lookin' at you if you weren't lookin' at me?
    18. Re:Many other health benefits by texas · · Score: 1

      mmmm... Guinness on tap. Those widgets they came up with for the can and the new bottle, brilliant as they say, but still can't compare to getting a true draught Guinness. Maybe it's psychological or something, but I swear the can leaves a slight metallic taste, and both the can and bottled versions taste burnt to me. A nice, warmish pint at the local pub, it's more of a creamy, dark caramel taste than the burnt peat of the stuff off the shelf.

      --
      Hey, how'd you know I was lookin' at you if you weren't lookin' at me?
    19. Re:Many other health benefits by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      After having my first pint on tap with a buddy of mine , we looked at each other and said (nearly at the same time) "we cant go back to bottles..."

      I personally don't much care for guinness draught out of the bottle..the nitro gizmo to me adds too much carbonation and the thing never settles down (does SOME if you pour it in a proper glass, but ouft of the bottle, never) the cans seem to be somewhat better (I like boddingtons out of a can) but still no contest, the nitro system leaves too much in the beer to compare to tap

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  49. threadjack by rawshark · · Score: 1

    so, what do people out there drink?

    for my part, I drink beer for the taste, and I am a lightweight (have trouble doing 2 beers in a night) so I tend to go for the upscale stuff: Hitachino White, Unibroue Terrible, and Delirium Tremens

    1. Re:threadjack by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I like stouts- I can easily stay under one glass an hour with stout, and that keeps me from getting drunk going home. The best is Deschutes Brewery Obsidian- but I'll take Guiness in a pinch, and the rest go downhill from there. I also prefer my beer to be fresh- brewed on site if possible.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:threadjack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pilsner Urquell (Czech). In my opinion, one of the only real beers you can get easily in this part of the US (Texas).

    3. Re:threadjack by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 1

      Blanche de Chambly (Unibroue), Guinness, and Strongbow cider.

      And when drinking pints, after two I'm coherent, after 4 I know I've had enough, and after 6+ the hangover is going to be bad anyways, so why stop?

      --

      ---

      Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

    4. Re:threadjack by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      Blanche de Chambly (Unibroue), Guinness, and Strongbow cider.

      I can't comment on the first two, but if you're going to drink something described as cider, at least drink a real cider or scrumpy. Strongbow is nasty chemical stuff - the equivalent of comparing UK-brewed Fosters XXXX with a good Belgian, German or Czech lager.

      The last two should even be on sale in most UK supermarkets.

      --

    5. Re:threadjack by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Wild Turkey. Beer is for pussies, and wine for effeminate pussies. Real men go straight for the good stuff.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  50. yes ossifer? by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 2, Funny

    Officer: Sir, I can sense a strong odor of alcohol from you. Are you drunk?
    Me: No ossifer, I'm just antioxidizing and dieting, fanks.

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
  51. Aren't' they giving scientists too much credit by scotay · · Score: 1

    Scientists, after all, have given us heart transplants, hip replacements, penicillin and super balls.

    Superballs maybe, but super balls are still in the pipeline, so to speak.

  52. coincidence? I don't think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The University of Western Ontario has a notorious reputation among Ontario students as being one of the craziest party universities around.

    The residences are nearly unregulated, and that combined with the flood of seventeen year olds coming in from the elimination of gr. 13 in Ontario makes for some pretty nasty drinking binges.

    Perhaps this had some part in at least the type of 'research' they were doing at Western. I have a feeling that a lot of students volunteered as 'test subjects'.

    1. Re:coincidence? I don't think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean:

      Perhaps this had some part in at least the type of 'research' they were doing at Western. I have a feeling that a lot of students volunteered as 'test subjects', EH?

  53. One beer a day to benefit? by f8free · · Score: 5, Funny

    So if I've already spent four years averaging six beers/day, I need to stay sober for the next twenty years to benefit?

    Man, am I glad I didn't go for that post-graduate degree!

  54. you know it! by deviantonline · · Score: 1
    ... (Canada)

    OBVIOUSLY! :)

  55. Drink Local by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I have to say is find a beer tonight close to you :)

    http://www.pubcrawler.com

    1. Re:Drink Local by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This weekend is Oktoberfest! Oregon's best is in Mt Angel! If you want a really good sausage, come by the Silverton KofC booth on Saturday morning- we put beer in our kraut on my father's shift (as well as boiling the sausage in beer, yum!).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Drink Local by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Hey, and I was just wondering WTF to do this weekend... Maybe I'll stop by the booth. What type of beer are you using in the kraut? I usually just use the beer I previously boiled the sausages in. You get that meaty, fatty flavor along with a bit of cracked red pepper. I typically use something cheap and amber in color or darker.

      I'll be the guy hanging out with a bunch of Russians :-)

    3. Re:Drink Local by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, your friends live in Bethleham? (Bethleham being a small, non-incorporated community near Woodburn, OR, full of Russian Orthodox believers).

      Yeah, we just use a cheap amber, usually whatever we can get in the keg for cheap. Haven't thought about using the sausage beer in the kraut, it's a good idea and I'll run it by my dad to see what he thinks. Usually, I just put in a half a cup for every 2 gallons of kraut as I'm heating it up.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  56. Soo..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's now sure, I'll live forever!

  57. Just remember..... by Meowing · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's also been linked to gout, stick to the wine.

  58. Alcohol is no health food by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the whole title of beer or wine being "healthy" is rediculous. Alcohol is the most damaging food product you can put in your body. It's far worse than trans-fatty acids, artificial ingredients (e.g., pesticides, food coloring), or sugar. I defy you to find any reputable medical researcher who would encourage people to take up drinking for health benefits. You want the health benefits of wine or beer? Eat some grapes instead. You'll get the benefits of the flavonoids without the damaging effects of the alcohol.

    Look, I have nothing against alcohol. I love wine and I'm fortunate to live in an area known for exceptional wine growing. But let's not kid ourselves about alcohol being some kind of health food. So put away your low-carb beer and your red wine and drink what you want -- in moderation.

    GMD

    1. Re:Alcohol is no health food by gewalker · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, read the article. The supposed mechanism is hormesis. This is the logic whereby you consume small amounts of toxins because there is a health benefit to consuming small amounts of toxins. Thoough it sounds crazy, it is not.

      This is also the reason a little radiation or a little arsenic may be good for you.

    2. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      You have a source?

      Yes, if you overstress your alcohol processing capacity alcohol can be poisonous, but reasonable amounts of it just break down in to sugars pretty quick.

      How is it "the most damaging food product you can put in your body ... far worse than ... pesticides"?

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    3. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, the whole title of beer or wine being "healthy" is rediculous. Alcohol is the most damaging food product you can put in your body.

      Actually, there are several "good" studies--published in reputable journals, with good methodology and solid statistical methods--that show an association between moderate alcohol consumption and appreciably reduced risk of a number of diseases. (Here, moderate is a range from approximately 1 to 3 drinks per day, depending on the study.)

      Reduced risks include cardiovascular diseases (heart attack, stroke) and neurological disorders (Alzheimers, other dementias, Parkinson's). There is a correlation with an overall reduced risk of mortality, even after controlling for income and education.

      Consumption of alcohol to excess definitely does systemic damage to quite a bit of the body, but there is no evidence that moderate consumption is harmful. Sure, the benefits aren't huge, but for most people there's definitely no reason to describe alcohol as the 'most damaging' food product they can consume*. Only half in jest, I would recommend the Big Mac for that title, or maybe a Krispy Kreme doughnut. Alcohol would definitely be waaaay down the list. Quite right--most reputable physicians and researchers wouldn't recommend taking up drinking solely for health reasons, but no reputable scientist will tell you to drop drinking entirely, either.

      *Exceptions include individuals who have a genetic inability to digest alcohol (defects in aldehyde dehydrogenase or another enzyme), or a predisposition towards alcoholism, or a liver or kidney disorder.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a friend who studies nutrition, and he said that, in moderate quantities, alcohol it's a good source of calories for the body - since alcohol is distilled from carbohydrates. Very good, in fact; the problem with alcohol it's that, as you said, becomes poisonous in high concentrations (it acts as a powerful dehydrant). Meaning that if you can tame the poisonous effects of alcohol, it actually serves as food.

      From Wikipedia: "In colder climates, strong alcoholic beverages are popularly seen as a way to "warm up" the body, possibly because ethanol is a quickly absorbed source of calories and dilates peripheral blood vessels. Their low freezing point may also have helped their popularity."

      Anyway, those beer-bellys don't come out of nowhere. Just nitpicking here, but alcohol it's far from "the most damaging food product you can put in your body". Moderation is the key, as in everything.

    5. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      I defy you to find any reputable medical researcher who would encourage people to take up drinking for health benefits.

      Read the article in Scientific American from a year or so ago. It says just that.

      Alcohol, not any other ingredients in the drink, significantly lowers the risk of heart disease. People who drink in moderation live longer on average; this has been confirmed in many studies.

      The key is the correct dose. No more than 2 drinks per day for men, 1 for women. Beyond that, the detriments outweigh the benefits.

      Like any medication, it has possible side effects. One is that the user becomes a lush. That's why many researchers are hesitant to recommend that someone who has never had a drink take up this regime; they may be a lush and just not know it yet. OTOH, the dosage guidelines from the studies may help convince others who drink too much cut back to the proper dosage.

    6. Re:Alcohol is no health food by russotto · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it's not just the flavonoids or tannins or any of the other likely suspects the US establishment likes pointing to whenever one of these studies is done. Whether or not it offends your and their puritanical senses, enough studies have been done to show that _it's the alcohol_ (at least partially).

    7. Re:Alcohol is no health food by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      1 Timothy 5:23

      Look it up.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    8. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, read the article. The supposed mechanism is hormesis

      Heheheh, you said "hormesis".

      just great, I still have the sense of humor of a 5-year-old

    9. Re:Alcohol is no health food by superyooser · · Score: 1

      Any alternatives would be better for your health if you had to drink this water.

    10. Re:Alcohol is no health food by ryanvm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The problem with studies like those is that no matter how hard they try, there is just no way to account for all the variables.

      People that drink a glass of red wine in the evening are likely to be more affluent than the average Coke and Cheetos connoisseur. They will therefore typically have access to much better healthcare and possibly take better care of themselves in general. So how do you figure out if it's the glass of wine in the evening, the yoga classes, the bottled waters, etc. The answer - you can't.

      I'll bet you'd also find that owning a luxury vehicle appears to result in a longer lifespan as well.

    11. Re:Alcohol is no health food by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      Alcohol is the most damaging food product you can put in your body. It's far worse than trans-fatty acids, artificial ingredients (e.g., pesticides, food coloring), or sugar.

      I think this statement is a good deal sillier than the article title. Quite obviously, it makes little sense to talk about the relative harm or benefit of any substance without discussing quantity. In excess, even water can pose an immdiate, serious health risk, and I'm not talking about drowning. But obviously, water is an essential nutrient.

      Heart disease is, by far, the number one killer of both men and women. On a societal level, then, it's pretty easy to make a strong case that fat, sugar, and cholesterol are significantly more harmful than alcohol. On a personal level, fat, sugar, and cholesterol consumed in huge excess are obviously more harmful than alcohol consumed in moderation.

    12. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Vintermann · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Actually, there are several "good" studies--published in reputable journals, with good methodology and solid statistical methods--that show an association between moderate alcohol consumption and appreciably reduced risk of a number of diseases. (Here, moderate is a range from approximately 1 to 3 drinks per day, depending on the study.) "

      What you don't hear very much is that industry-supported researchers have different definitions of alcohol than most of us. To them, wine and beer are "different alcohol types", instead of merely different types of alcohol-containing beverages. This gives them quite a lot more wiggle room to say that alcohol is healthy.

      If you by alcohol mean ethanol, then the original poster is right: It's probably the most dangerous substance allowed for consumption, and it's dangers have been seriously documented since the double-blind study was invented. All positive effects "alcohol consumption" may have come from the other parts of beer and wine.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    13. Re:Alcohol is no health food by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well I suppose it's reasonable if it kills off the weaker/unfit cells of your body and you have stronger ones to spare (and to regenerate new ones from). If you don't have stronger+better spares then it's a bad idea...

      Apparently fasting from time to time is good for health. Perhaps it also allows the body to reset certain things too - rezero the various sensors/mechanisms etc.

      --
    14. Re:Alcohol is no health food by bogado · · Score: 1
      Reduced risks include cardiovascular diseases (heart attack, stroke) and neurological disorders (Alzheimers, other dementias, Parkinson's). There is a correlation with an overall reduced risk of mortality, even after controlling for income and education.


      I actualy read this paragraph like "There is a correlation with an overall reduced risk of morality" witch I would have compleatly agreed also. :-)

      Serious though, too much drink is bad. For instance, it does gives you some serious headaches in the morning and you will never know for sure what a hell did you told that girl.
      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    15. Re:Alcohol is no health food by cozziewozzie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The positive effects attributed to wine are certainly not due to the alcohol content. Alcohol is a poison and the grandparent is correct in saying that. The positive effects you are seeing are due to different enzymes which come from grapes, not from ethanol.

      If you want to watch your health, instead of drinking a glass of wine, drink a litre of grape juice, or a kilo of grapes. Much more healthy than intoxicating your liver with ethanol.

      Come on, people here should be educated. Wine = alcohol. Wine = healthy, therefore alcohol = healthy? No.

    16. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the damned post before you reply

    17. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      The positive effects attributed to wine are certainly not due to the alcohol content. Alcohol is a poison and the grandparent is correct in saying that. The positive effects you are seeing are due to different enzymes which come from grapes, not from ethanol.

      The Rotterdam prospective study of 5395 individuals (6 year study, 99.7% participant followup) found that incidence of dementia was significantly reduced in moderate drinkers, even after controlling for "age, sex, systolic blood pressure, education, smoking, and body-mass index". There was "no evidence that the relation between alcohol and dementia varied by type of alcoholic beverage."

      Link is to the abstract on PubMed, the original citation is Ruitenberg A et al. "Alcohol consumption and risk of dementia: the Rotterdam Study." Lancet 359(9303):281-6 (2002). The full text is here.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    18. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      So put away your low-carb beer and your red wine and drink what you want -- in moderation.

      I drink realbeer. Does this mean I can drink as much as I want?

      But I agree that low-carb/lite beer is the worst stuff you can put in your body. That is, if you don't mind being a jerk or a sissy.

      Never trust a man who drinks Coors Light.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    19. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      The positive effects attributed to wine are certainly not due to the alcohol content. Alcohol is a poison and the grandparent is correct in saying that. The positive effects you are seeing are due to different enzymes which come from grapes, not from ethanol.

      True, the earliest studies finding beneficial effects of alcohol consumption did note those effects in drinkers of (predominantly red) wine. This link was drawn due to the so-called "French Paradox", where despite regular consumption of foods associated with cardiovascular problems the French people had a low incidence of heart disease.

      Hypothesizing that antioxidants in red wine might provide some cardioprotective effect, researchers indeed found a link between red wine consumption and reduced risk of heart disease. However, since virtually all consumers of alcohol in France are exposed to at least some red wine as part of that alcohol consumption, it wasn't possible to separate out the effects of different types of alcohol.

      More recent large-scale, prospective studies have broken down their results by type. Both the Rotterdam study of dementia and the PRIME study of coronary heart disease found no statistically significant difference between the effects of beer, wine, and spirits. (The Rotterdam study also broke out fortified wines--ports and sherries--as an additional separate category, also with no significant difference.)

      To my knowledge, nobody has done any sort of large-scale, controlled human study of the effects of the consumption of pure ethanol. This is because nobody drinks straight ethanol, so it's hard to get a good study group. I would argue that the 'spirits' category in the above studies might come close.

      I quite agree that in large doses alcohol is an acute poision, and that drinking to excess can lead to chronic liver problems, coronary illness, and neurological disoders. On the other hand, I suspect that moderate consumption of ethanol is harmless and probably beneficial for most people since the studies cited above (among others, PubMed is your friend) found benefits across all types of beverages. A little cod liver oil can eliminate vitamin deficiencies and provide beneficial fatty acids. An excess of cod liver oil can severely harm you through vitamin A or D poisoning. The dose makes the poison, as they say.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    20. Re:Alcohol is no health food by danila · · Score: 1

      Yeah, dementia of all things possible. So you trade long-term clinical dementia for repeating short-term self-induced dementia, called "intoxication". Thanks, but I'd rather take my chances than voluntarily kill my brain cells and end up being tipsy most of the time (1-3 drinks a day means you are slightly drunk almost 100% of the time).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    21. Re:Alcohol is no health food by rcharbon · · Score: 1
      there are several "good" studies...that show an association between moderate alcohol consumption and appreciably reduced risk of a number of diseases. (Here, moderate is a range from approximately 1 to 3 drinks per day)

      What if I only drink twice a week, but have 6 drinks each time?

    22. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Heywood+Jablonski · · Score: 1
      Actually, there are several "good" studies--published in reputable journals, with good methodology and solid statistical methods--that show an association between moderate alcohol consumption and appreciably reduced risk of a number of diseases.

      But showing an "association" (or "link") between moderate consumption of alchohol and a reduced risk of disease is not the same as showing that moderate consumption of alchohol results in a reduced risk of those diseases.

      It is just as likely that the sort of person who drinks moderately has lower stress, and the lower stress is actually reducing the risk of (for instance) heart disease.

      So go do yoga instead!

    23. Re:Alcohol is no health food by Suidae · · Score: 1

      I've read that cell damage from low exposures to radiation results in programmed death of the damaged cells. However, when the radiation exposure is higher and more cells are damaged repair mechanisms are triggered.

      The researchers speculated that its easier to kill of the cells than repair them, but the body can't kill off too many at once, and so can resort to repair in some cases.

      No indication if repaired cells are more likely to become cancerous or otherwise fail.

      If true, I find it fascinating that these robust recovery mechanisms have evolved. Makes me wonder what computer technology will be like when we can use advanced evolutionary techniques guided by intelligence to produce new systems.

  59. Speaking for the Badger State... by nastro · · Score: 1

    "Beer Found to be as Healthy as Wine" ...

    "Yaaaaay!"

    "But the key is moderation. The researchers found three beers would have the opposite effect." ...

    "Aaaaaaw."

    I thought I had a good thing there, for a minute. Dang. Oh, well, if the beer doesn't kill me, the cigarettes will. And if the cigarettes don't kill me, then dammit, I'm just not trying hard enough then.

    1. Re:Speaking for the Badger State... by xQx · · Score: 1

      "But the key is moderation. The researchers found three beers would have the opposite effect."

      But they didn't say anything about 24 BEERS!

      One for each hour of the day.

      mmmmm beer.

  60. You messed up the quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Beer is proof that God exists and wants us to be happy."
    - Benjamin Franklin

  61. woohoo by panic911 · · Score: 2, Funny

    score one for us drunks!

    1. Re:woohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      w00t! hey dude! take it from me.

      Beer is good for you

  62. Contradictory as always by limegreenman · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The downer with any sort of epidemiological research like this is that it is hard to conclude much from the results of any one study. There are other studies that show the reverse of this finding (as well as studies with findings more consistent with this). It's only when looking at the aggregate of a whole bunch of research that you can really develop a clearer picture of what's actually happening.

    Just the other day I heard a cardiologist arguing that, at least in terms of positive cardiac health, the level where wine becomes more harmful than good was at least two-thirds of a bottle. That's my kind of moderation!!

    1. Re:Contradictory as always by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, for the alcoholics in the audience, he didn't specify the size of the bottle.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  63. Reality check by drmike0099 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This article should be taken with a grain of salt. First of all, it's about as minor a medical discovery as you could find, in terms of potential impact of the study, where it was published, etc. (makes me wonder if the submitter was an author). There was a massive article on a similar topic in the New England Journal of Medicine last year, which actually studied actual humans and their actual outcomes (link here) that didn't make it onto slashdot, and proved essentially the same thing. This is just talking about a lab proof about antioxidants, which are currently only one theory as to why alcohol is good for you. In other words, this is nice to know, but doesn't prove anything we didn't already know.

  64. Great by Karma+Star · · Score: 1

    So we can all become braindead morons with 20 year old bodies 70 years from now.

    Sorry, but there are better ways to consume your antioxidants.

    --
    Me email iz skyewalkerluke at microsoft's free email service.
    1. Re:Great by Jo3sh · · Score: 1

      Since, according to my wife, I'm already a braindead moron (and a 33-year old one at that), can I expect nothing but improvement if I continue to drink beer?

  65. its the alcohol by OklaKid · · Score: 0

    i usually drink one mixed drink of 7UP with a splash of bourbon in th4e evening to keep the bacon grease washed out of my bloodstream...

  66. Coors for Senate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  67. Let's drink better beer. by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not that YOU personally would do this, but I have seen discussions arguing over "Beer X is better than Beer Y" where both sides clearly need to widen their beer horizons.

    So let's get edjumucated. (and seriously, what could be more fun?) Here are two lists of (mostly) great beers that have very wide distribtuions--go out and find something on these lists that you haven't had, and try it tonight!

    RateBeer's top 'accessible' beer list.

    BeerAdvocate's 'Best Most Available Beers' list.

    There are other lists, too, these are just to get you started. You can go to both site's "Top beers" to find a list of even better beers, although many of those could be hard to find.

    1. Re:Let's drink better beer. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "So let's get edjumucated. (and seriously, what could be more fun?)"

      I wonder if I'm the only one who had to read that sentence twice.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:Let's drink better beer. by circusboy · · Score: 1

      all of this reminds me of a time almost 20 years ago when I went to fenway park to see a game.

      out in center field there's an odd double layer of bleachers and the crowd in the upper and the crowd in the lower started shouting at each other. everybody sort of looked over and all at once they seemed to get it together and from all the way on the far side of the stadium you could here the clarion calls of;

      "tastes great!"

      "less filling!"

      the small irony of the moment, (leaving out the bit about too many people being too affected by TV commercials,) was that they were sitting directly beneath a budweiser sign.
      #for those of you who don't remember/care that was a miller lite slogan.

      given this new news, I wonder what they might yell today?

      any thoughts?

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    3. Re:Let's drink better beer. by kent_eh · · Score: 1
      On the subject of learning more about beer, I attended a few courses
      on the subject a couple of years ago.

      I mean if the "wine snobs" can have their wine appreciation courses, why can't we beer (or Whiskey) drinkers have the same.


      Education aside, ya gotta love a course that recommends a designated driver!

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    4. Re:Let's drink better beer. by wrook · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's hard to argue that those aren't good beers (although Harp and Killian's would hardly make it into my top 100). But are these really widely available? I'd kill to have some of the beers on those lists, but I'd have to go a *very* long way to get them I'm sure...

    5. Re:Let's drink better beer. by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      I remember doing the same thing a while back. I was at an amusment park and I decided to ride the battering ram or whatever that thing is call. Basically a big boat they strat you in and swint you from side to side. Anyway, the people on the left when they went up would scream "tastes great!" and the right would scream "less filling!"...

      What amusment park was this?... Busch Gardens Williamsburg of course! Small world hu?

      PS: Hop skip and a jump from boston is your ever in for a good tourist outing, the wife will love colonial williamsburg too.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    6. Re:Let's drink better beer. by autechre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bah. Neither list seems to include Sprecher, a tiny brewery in Milwaukee that ships less beer than the folks down the street at Miller spill. They also do soda (all of which is sweetened with honey instead of sugar). They brew the beer according to the German brewing laws (only water, yeast, grain, and hops). You can get a tour of the place, taste 4 beers and unlimited sodas, and keep the glass, all for $3. I went with another person, so I tried 8 beer types and all the sodas. Tasty to the last.

      I got back to Baltimore and haven't been able to find Sprecher in this area yet, but they do ship around. See if you're lucky enough to have some. We have a great little bar in Baltimore (Brewer's Art) that specializes in Belgian beer, so I guess I can't complain too much.

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  68. Less is like more, only better by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The study showed that there is a nonlinear curve relating the amount of beer consumed and overall health. So there must be some factor other than the antioxidant effect at work.

    I'm not a physiologist, or even very smart, so the rest of this is pure guesswork:

    Probably small amounts of alcohol don't do bad things to you, and may even clean crud from the blood and arteries. Larger amounts make the kidneys work harder, and the excess is eventually converted to fat.

    Since most people (in the population that eats enough to read Slashdot) have enough fat already, these negative health effects of alcohol take over with increased consumption.

    The formula for health may be formed like:
    health = q + .5 q ^ 2
    where q is the daily consumption.

    It's obviously more complex than that, but as I said, I'm not a medic. The point to my guess is that the effect is not linear, but it's also not exponentially bad for you to drink more. 10 beers/day is not much worse for you than, say, 5. The curve levels off.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Less is like more, only better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's obviously more complex than that, but as I said, I'm not a medic. The point to my guess is that the effect is not linear, but it's also not exponentially bad for you to drink more. 10 beers/day is not much worse for you than, say, 5. The curve levels off.

      Don't forget to chop the curve off at the point where the average person dies of alcohol poisoning.

  69. Don't jump for joy yet... by (eternal_software) · · Score: 1

    "And the bad news is that drinking three bottles of beer a day actually causes the blood to become pro-oxidant and increases the risk of such diseases 30 to 40 per cent."

    1 seems to be the sweet spot, even 2 reduces the benefits.

    Oh well.

    1. Re:Don't jump for joy yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who drinks 1 a day, i'm jumping for joy

      Drinking to get drunk is overratted and immature.. if i want to get high i'll smoke pot.. although i dont do that.. but if it were legal i would

  70. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A study funded by British Nuclear Fuels today found that men who live near the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant in Cumbria have bigger dicks.

    Unfortunately they found out that the "women" have bigger dicks as well.

  71. And Who Said? by cdc179 · · Score: 1

    Geeks aren't healthy. I'm reading ./ while drinking an McEwans's Scotch Ale.....Ummmmm!

    1. Re:And Who Said? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parrent up.

  72. Erm, well... by seanmckay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, yes, it is about the water. Water is amazingly important to different beer styles--it's why you get pale ale in London and brown in Newcastle. Mineral content difference. And no, darker doesn't necessarily mean better, and lighter colored is not equal to watered down. There's more grain in our amber ale than our porter, for example.

    Yes, I brew for a living.

    1. Re:Erm, well... by pyite · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree water has a bearing on the quality of the beer, but there's no reason you can't brew 100 different kinds of beer from the same water.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  73. acetaldehyde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is doubtful that the antioxidants contained in beer and wine are what's giving them their life preserving properties. Oddly enough, it's more probable that there's a beneficial effect from ethanol's toxic metabolite: acetaldehyde.

    Acetaldehyde does a nice job preventing non-enzymatic protein cross-linking. Read for yourself: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/5/2385

  74. I'll drink to that!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Homebrew, of course. :)

    Mmmmmmm...IPA

  75. Authoritarian Bastards! by iamatlas · · Score: 1
    ...helps police harmful free radicals...

    See?!? The MAN always tring to keep somthin' down.

  76. Also Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True, but you never hear about a "beero."

    ...or would that be a "beercoholic?" Just can't get enough of that beercohol.

  77. Beer vs. "low carb" nuts by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Beer still has to battle against the more extreme low-carb advocates out there. One book, the popular South Beach Diet, goes to such an effort to discredit beer that it fallaciously compares consuming beer to consuming 100% pure maltose, simply because beer contains some maltose. The claims in the book made me think the author has some sort of agenda against beer or alcohol that go far beyond low-carb eating.

    --
    -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    1. Re:Beer vs. "low carb" nuts by the+arbiter · · Score: 2, Interesting



      I think the "South Beach" author has some sort of agenda that has nothing to do with dieting, period.

      My take on it is that, while flying the banner of health and weight loss, a lot of these books and diets are nothing more than thinly veiled attempts at promoting prohibition and, for want of a better term, puritanism. Lord knows most of the diets themselves are certainly not healthy (Atkins).

      </tinfoil hat>

      --
      Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
    2. Re:Beer vs. "low carb" nuts by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Ya, that South Beach Diet is retarded. But, then again, American's are kind'a dumb. They'll buy anything as long as it's easy and has a snazzy PR campaign.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    3. Re:Beer vs. "low carb" nuts by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I think it is more likely that these authors, like many advocates for various causes, have gained just enough knowledge to think they know what's right for everyone else while causing harm due to the remaining things they don't know. There are so many contradictions among fad diets with real health consequences, that I'm suprised the FDA/FTC/etc. haven't stepped in and declared them all as false advertising and bad advice based on faulty evidence. The profit motive isn't very encouraging, either.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    4. Re:Beer vs. "low carb" nuts by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      They'll buy anything as long as it's easy and has a snazzy PR campaign.

      Proven by the persistence of infomercials during the early morning hours on TV. You'd think they would give up after the 500th attempt to push a new excersize machine, but they keep going and going.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  78. Re:Should have called it: by johndoesovich · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    you suck

    --
    alias dir='rm -rf /'
  79. Interesting, but... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think jumping to any conclusions is a little premature at this point. While I've only been picking up tidbits of information in this area, I was under the impression that we're only just now getting to the point of understanding the actual mechanism of action behind the health benefits provided by red wine. This article seemed to imply that the study is working under the assumption that all or most of the benefit is being provided by it acting as an antioxident. While I'm certainly not going to dismiss any benefit from antioxidents, I do think they get a little more positive press than deserved based on most studies.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
    1. Re:Interesting, but... by 808140 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah. The antioxident thing may be true, but the whole "people who drink a glass of red wine everyday live longer, have lower rates of heart disease, etc" study that everyone was parroting back in the early 90s in fact turned out to be a flawed experiment.

      People that drink a glass of red wine everyday tend to live a much more, dare I say it, bourgeois lifestyle than those that don't. That the rich are healthier and live longer shouldn't surprise anyone.

      It was actually shown to be a lifestyle difference rather than something attributable to red wine. The design of the experiment was completely flawed (think about it: how do you test the long term effects of drinking a glass of red wine everyday? How do you control that? You can really only find a bunch of people that have been regular (moderate) red wine drinkers all their lives and look at their health, versus people that haven't. But while a positive correlation exists, how on earth can you establish causality? The experiment is completely uncontrolled.)

  80. Homer doesn't look healthy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As always the much obliged Simpson reference.

  81. misread... by xoff00 · · Score: 1

    Its sad. I glanced at the title out of the corner of my eye and saw "CowboyNeal Found to be as Healthy as Wine"

    Still, I'm glad. Now to go have a Guinness and begrudge my lost towel...

    --
    ...Xoff
    Phineas J. Whoopie, you're the greatest!
  82. Ugh.. I hate this b.s. by Morgon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What's with the propaganda crap going around in media today? "Oooh, alcohol is good for you" ... "Oh but marijuana has such a medicinal effect".
    I mean, hell - in the 50s, cigarettes were promoted for good health.

    It's all harmful to your body - and to those who have to put up with the shit from people who use it.

    If you want to screw yourselves up, that's fine - but at least stop trying to steer the rest of society into falsely thinking that these things 'help'.
    Avoiding the cliche 'think of the children', there are plenty of people of every age who are heavily influenced by society and media.

    This type of spin is just as harmful as the substances in question.

    --
    [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
    1. Re:Ugh.. I hate this b.s. by Morgon · · Score: 1

      Yeah - you only wish it were flamebait. Good job.

      --
      [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
  83. Of course, Australians have known this... by riprjak · · Score: 1

    ...for a long time.

    Its why we ween our children on beer :)

  84. Which beer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's beer did they use to study this? If it was US beer, I'm laughing, I drink British beer. US beer is like having sex in a canoe, it's fucking close to water. So I'm even better protected!

  85. Of Course beer is good for me it gives me a job by microbrewer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Being a professional brewer this is not new news many studies are done every year if beer or wine are bad or good for you depends on the research project and who is funding it at the time .

  86. No thanks. by funny-jack · · Score: 1

    Oh, no thank you. I don't drink.

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
  87. The catch.... by Kioti · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    hmmm "University" and "Canada" in the same sentence. I think we should ask for a second opinion. eh?

    --
    Regards,
    ~Joshua Norton
  88. Genius.. by polyp2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Researchers at the University of Western Ontario (i.e piss-head students)

    I imagine the research was a real bind ;) .. Even so I wish I'd had an idea like this for my final year!

    Im thinking of doing some research into proving that an end of night curry or chilli kebab helps prevent a killer hangover. Anyone care to sponsor me ?

    Nick...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  89. Most beers have high carb content by GillBates0 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    except for the new fangled low-carb beers like Michelob Ultra.

    In the process of trying to lose weight, I've done a lot of reading lately on why low-carb diets work, and most of thee details seem pretty logical and convincing to me. Here in a nutshell, is why I think high-carb beers cannot be healthier than (usually) low-carb wines for people trying to lose weight:

    High carb and sugar diets cause the release of Insulin in the body, which is a signal to the body that more than adequate nutrition is available as a result of which, the survival mechanism kicks in and stores any fat consumed thereafter as body fat, with the carbs being used for energy. When carb consumption is lowered, however, Insulin is absent from the bloodstream, and fat is burnt instead for energy.

    Hence, from this standpoint, the food pyramid (which suggests low fat instead of low carbs) as well as high carb beers are unhealthier, since they encourage storage of more fat in the body, leading to obesity.

    In any case, I'm not a biologist, and I've found this way of eating quite health and effective. Thought I'd chip in with my $0.02.

    For those interested in more details, look up Slashdot's earlier coverage of the subject:Hackera on Atkins".

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Most beers have high carb content by kavau · · Score: 1
      High carb and sugar diets cause the release of Insulin in the body I think this greatly depends on what type of carbs. This rise in Insulin is only triggered by simple carbs, like sugar, afaik. It takes the body much longer to process complex carbs, so this effect isn't as pronounced. I don't know what category the carbs in beer fall into.

      Otoh, the proverbial beer belly is a reality, so beer probably has lots of simple carbs.

    2. Re:Most beers have high carb content by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 2, Informative


      The low-carb diets fall short where they do not discriminate among different forms of carbohydrate. Of all the fad diets, the ones based on the glycemic index actually make the most sense, as it is obvious that a cup of chick peas will be easier on the pancreas than a cup of boiled potatoes. The pure black-and-white low-carb diets are pretty much based on poor logic and/or all-out misinformation (they really do read like pseudo-science, few citations, many conclusions). For example, ketosis just isn't a normal healthy state, and it puts an unnecessary burden on the kidneys. Also, low-carb diets are not repeatable for some reason (as evidenced by a family member who absolutely lost no weight the second time around on Atkins even when being very strict--the first time was very effective, however). My impression is that the low-carb fad started when Atkins made a simple observation about ketosis and ran away with it making millions of dollars in book sales. No one can say the real long term damage done to people by dieting, especially the diets with two-week phases of bodily abuse.

      I actually believe that all diets are bad, and that people should seek out eating what pretty much all fad diets boil down to in their "maintenance" phases: whole foods, prepared fresh, , not all fats are bad (many are good), not all carbohydrates are bad (many are good), moderation always, et cetera ad naseum.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    3. Re:Most beers have high carb content by 808140 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      High carb and sugar diets cause the release of Insulin in the body, which is a signal to the body that more than adequate nutrition is available as a result of which, the survival mechanism kicks in and stores any fat consumed thereafter as body fat, with the carbs being used for energy. When carb consumption is lowered, however, Insulin is absent from the bloodstream, and fat is burnt instead for energy.

      While this may be strictly true, the body's "store as fat" mechanism only happens if your body isn't burning all the Calories it ingests. This is a result of having a low metabolic rate. A low metabolic rate is caused by lack of exercise, surprise.

      This is why starving yourself will also lead to losing weight, and why the minute you stop doing it, you'll gain it all back (as is the case with low carb diets, and any diet in fact, which is not accompanied by exercise.) Your body goes into survival "I'm starving quick store everything I eat who knows when I'll eat again" mode.

      Americans (and I say this as an American) are hopelessly overweight, and we have a very weight conscious society. As a result, we spend a tremendous amount of time trying to lose weight. But very few people (especially fat people, sadly) want to do the actual work required to lose it. This is why stuff like the Atkins diet, anorexic self-starvation, and diet pills are so popular. People don't want to actually get off their butts and work out. They want to continue leading their sedentary lifestyles and lose weight.

      When you think about it, it really isn't surprising. Americans work harder (longer hours, etc) than essentially anyone else in the world, on average. It stands to reason, then, that we have very little free time, and many of us have office jobs where we sit around all day. So those of us who don't much like exercise to begin with are unlikely to use what little free time we have working out. It's a problem.

      But recognize that any diet without exersise will, at best, give you temporary results, which will force you to diet basically forever.

      The way you describe the Atkins diet is the same way that people suffering from anorexia describe the celery diet. Celery has negative Calories -- it requires more energy to break it down than you get from it, it being mostly cellulose. Anorexics discovered that they could just eat celery and lose weight extremely fast. They were essentially starving themselves (hello, negative Cals) but it didn't feel that way, because they always had a full stomach.

      Low carb diets are the same. Eat only food which is more difficult to burn than fat, and your body will preferentially burn fat. But this is just as stupid as the celery diet, for exactly the same reasons.

      If you want to lose weight, exercise. Play a sport. Do something. Get off your ass. And eat what you want.

    4. Re:Most beers have high carb content by wrook · · Score: 1

      Man, this is sooo off topic, but I'm going to post anyway. If you are obese it's because you are eating more than you are buring. Anybody who tells you otherwise is trying to sell something.

      Storing fat is *not* a bad thing. It's great if you go through times when food is not so available. Having fat on you is *not* unhealthy. Being obese *is* unhealthy.

      But there's a really serious thing here: Eating a low carb diet *might* help you reduce your weight, but it won't make you healthy! Let me add a few more exclamation points to that !!!! Low carb diets don't make you healthy. Being in ketoses is *not* good for you!!!

      People need to wake up and smell the beer (ob ontopic word). Diet is only *one* facet of a healthy lifestyle. The rest includes sleeping well, removing stress and getting an appropriate amount of exercise. If you don't adress *all* of those issues, you will probably be unhealthy.

      Moving towards a healthly lifestyle is hard. It will probably involve a *lot* of head work as well as body work. But you *can* do it! Please, just stay *away* from those fad diets. They just make it more difficult to heal yourself.

      OK, I feel better now...

    5. Re:Most beers have high carb content by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I agree with you about the glycemic index thing.

      Thing is the high carb low calorie diets were based as much on myth and all-out misinformation as well. And they appear to be worse for health than the low carb diets.

      Sure given the same amount of calories a high carb diet works as well as a low carb diet for losing weight. But the main thing these studies don't tell you is - how hungry do people feel on the various diets?

      With the high protein low carb diets, people actually feel full, so it is easier for them to stop stuffing their faces.

      The food pyramid was thought up by the _food_producers_ NOT the health people. For years they've been telling people to eat more bread and potatoes...

      Last of all, people should STOP DRINKING those HUGE fizzy sugar drinks. Those must be nearly as bad for health as smoking a cigarette if not more so.

      I see people drinking such large amounts of sugar water - and it's not for quenching their thirst, because if they tried to drink the same amount of plain water it'll be a lot harder - their body would usually tell them "enough!".

      Just the thought of all that sugar rushing into their bloodstream scares me.

      --
    6. Re:Most beers have high carb content by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      While this may be strictly true, the body's "store as fat" mechanism only happens if your body isn't burning all the Calories it ingests. This is a result of having a low metabolic rate. A low metabolic rate is caused by lack of exercise.

      If you ingest more than you use, you will put on weight. a < b could be caused by small a or by large b.

      If you want to lose weight, exercise. And eat what you want

      I've worked out a lot, and I've watched what I eat, a lot. I can say without hesitation If you want to lose weight, eat less. Excercise is the lesser of the two factors involved in weight management. However, if you want to be fit, healthy and shapely with your thinness, that's a different matter. Work out too.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    7. Re:Most beers have high carb content by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      Thing is the high carb low calorie diets were based as much on myth and all-out misinformation as well.

      This is why I said I believe all diets are bad. They paint an incomplete picture and just put people through undue stress. I agree that sugary sodas are bad. Those fake "10% juice" fruit drinks are worse, IMO, because of the misleading marketing to parents. The engineered sports drinks are better, though, as they really do make a difference during arduous physical activity (glucose plus sodium and postassium), and they don't have as many calories as soda.

      If the obesity epidemic continues, I wonder if an image of the 64oz. bladder buster cups at convenience stores will replace the bald eagle as a symbol of America. Few things are more American than a supersized double quarter pounder meal with a half-gallon of soda. Take a 7000lb. SUV through the drive-through and the picture is complete.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    8. Re:Most beers have high carb content by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Well, some people have a genetic predisposition to being overweight, and these people are, frankly, mostly SOL. They're just going to be huskier than average, just as some people are just always skinnier than average. The only way we can make life better for these people is if we (as a society) start redefining our rather strict (and unrealistic) standards of beauty.

      But your point about a < b, while strictly true, ignores the way your body works. Your metabolic rate is like an engine, and controls how much sustenance you convert to energy. It does not change quickly. Many people seem to think that if they work out a bunch, their metabolic rate immediately goes up, and if they stop working out, it immediately goes down. This is not the case. It takes a fair amount of work to change your metabolic rate, and it typically happens over the course of several months of working out (or not working out, depending on whether the rate is increasing or decreasing).

      So for example, I have a very high metabolic rate, and I burn 2500 to 3000 Calories per day. My body does this on its own. I don't need to work out to burn this much; my body simply knows that because I lead an active lifestyle, in order for me to have enough energy to do the things I like to do, I have to burn this much. Energy that gets burnt and not used is essentially wasted.

      It's just like the reactor that powers your power grid. It produces a fixed flow of energy. Energy that gets used to do productive work gets used; energy that doesn't, bleeds off. Either way, the reactor produces the same amount of energy. The technicians that run it are not going to reduce its power output because there were a few days where the grid drew less power -- it will take them a long time to establish a trend.

      Your body works the same way. The only way to get it consistantly burning a large number of Calories per day is to work out enough that it thinks it needs to burn that much to get by. This takes a long time. But the upshot is that whether I excersize tomorrow or not, I can consume 3000 calories and break even. That's a lot of food.

      Now, it is true that changing to healthier eating habits is important when you're trying to lose weight. There are two things to keep in mind, and both are kind of simple and don't involve starving yourself.

      The first is, only eat when you're hungry. Don't eat because you're bored, or you just need something in your mouth, until your metabolic rate is high enough that it doesn't much matter. We tech guys are particularly bad about this. It's nice to snack and code. Have a coke while you're admining your vax cluster. Or whatever. But resist this until you're in good shape.

      The second is, drink lots of water. It doesn't matter if you have to pee all the time -- chances are, you're at the office most of the day anyway, and getting up to pee everynow and then will mean you're not always sitting around, which is an added bonus. But the most important reason to drink lots of water -- other than the fact that a well hydrated body works far better than a poorly hydrated one -- is because humans confuse hunger and thirst. I mean all humans. Physiologically. A very similar signal is sent to the brain and is often misinterpreted. If you drink a lot of water, you will not feel anywhere near as hungry, because in all likelyhood, 50% of the "hunger" signals you think you're getting are actually thirst signals, and you don't realize it. Most humans think they're thirsty when "their throat is dry". This actually means you're dehydrated.

      Obviously, if your current lifestyle involves you ingesting 4000 Cals of hamburgers, chips and beer per day, and you only burn 1000 Calories sitting in your chair per day, you need to rethink your eating habits. But the point is that the amount you eat in a day, and the amount of work you actually do in a day do not need to satisfy your a < b inequality, as long as your metabolic engine is running fast enough.

      And getting it to run fast enough means working out.

  90. A truly relevant Simpsons quote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's specious reasoning.

    Good news for your grandad, but you ought to repeat to yourself 100 times:

    Correlation does not imply Causality.

    I'm sure I read that beer causes cancer some time ago, and I read the same thing about coffee, wine, sea air and practically everything else that one can do, eat or breathe. This is why I have everything in moderation, because these experts with whom we have entrusted our lives seem totally unable to make their minds up.

  91. Beer... Wine... by grooviecode · · Score: 2, Funny

    Time for someone to start some research of the great benefits of Tequila!!!

  92. Expect the Price of Beer to Rise by 0x1234 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When red wine was declared (in moderation) to be healthy, the price went up. A bottle of merlot that used to cost 5 dollars a bottle (when it wasn't good for you) now costs 8 dollars. When it was widely publicized that Oats helped lower cholesterol, the price of everything containing oats went up. Check the cereal isle. Now beer is healthy!!? ARRRRGHHHH!!!

    1. Re:Expect the Price of Beer to Rise by Linux_ho · · Score: 1
      When red wine was declared (in moderation) to be healthy, the price went up. A bottle of merlot that used to cost 5 dollars a bottle (when it wasn't good for you) now costs 8 dollars.
      Maybe you were just watching a particular brand...? I can still find $5 wine all over the place. As a brand establishes itself, especially in wineries, they raise the prices as the market will bear them. Didn't notice any changes in the price of oatmeal. Maybe you should get into commodities trading. :-)
      --
      include $sig;
      1;
    2. Re:Expect the Price of Beer to Rise by ThousandStars · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you've ever had Two Buck Chuck, you'd know you can get a decent wine for relatively little money.

      I'm not going to call it the best wine in the world, or even the best bang for your buck, but it's nice with food when one can't afford better (you can replace "one" with "I" in my case).

    3. Re:Expect the Price of Beer to Rise by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 2, Informative

      When it was widely publicized that Oats helped lower cholesterol...

      And when you read the fine print, it is by only 3%. I.e, this is 6 points for a person with a cholesterol of 200. So oatmeal gets someone down to 194. Big whoop-de-doo. Just lay off the chili cheese fries and quintuple-scoop ice cream, folks.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  93. I JUST FOUND MY DUI DEFENSE! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Funny

    Honestly judge, I wasn't drunk, I was taking a nutritional supplement.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  94. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So free as in beer is good because it's not free as in radicals?

  95. Free radicals? by mikael · · Score: 4, Funny

    how beer helps police harmful free radicals in blood, The London Free Press also has an article."

    beer, Police, free radicals, blood, London Free Press?

    All the standard ingredients for another protest day in London.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  96. well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, this may simply indicate how miniscule the effect is, positive or otherwise.

  97. Re:you are drinking the wrong beer!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Try something from x/russsian states called "baltica"
    8% alcohol in a 17 fl OZ for a $1.50 a bottle.
    And the last thing you neeed to worry about
    is weight gain when you are drinking alcohol,
    think about your health first man!!!!
    Can you do the same amount of physical activity
    after a good nights drinking the next day ???
    Thats the alcohol fucking up your whole system ,
    that should be your main concern .

    Get the facts straight first , alcohol is far
    worse for you that tobaco or pot/weed or even
    some other harder drugs i wont mention.

    And i have done quite a fiew of those drugs to
    have a good judgemet(not good spelling since
    english isn't my first language) about the effects
    of each of them on my health and well being .
    I consider alcohol to be one of the worsed ones
    out there. By the way ever think that most of
    the hair loss is atributed to drinking ???????
    try downing a six pack and see how fast your
    hair brush fills up the next fiew days !!!!!!!

    peace

    dan

  98. Well, since it's not the alcohol by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since alcohol isn't the cause of most of these effects, wouldn't this reccomend non-alcoholic beers and wines?

    Ideally, you'd use yeast to make a vitamin drink, removing excess sugars/calories. You'd remove the alcohol. Then you'd drink.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  99. Marketing talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As healthy as wine" is another way of saying that both are unhealthy but bear is not much worse than wine.

    Jumping from 9 story building could is as healthy as jumping from a bridge.

  100. Any less expensive alternative? by Sark666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Beer, in this great land of Canada eh, is kinda expensive (over a buck a bottle). I'd hate to have to treat my beer as a regular expense (1 bottle a day per month equals $30+ each month).

    So is there a cheaper alternative to getting this health benefit?

    Also, say you do drink occasionally (say once a month having 6-9drinks) does that negate the benefits of this?

  101. ha... is that news? by yarikoptic · · Score: 1

    USA pharmacies which are supposed to be 'medical drug-stores' has been selling such kind of antioxydants for quite a long time, which was really surprising for visitors which usually see just boring pills in the pharmacies of their home countries. But now I see the reason ;-)

  102. Free Beer! by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Free Beer! That's beer that's free as pretzels and open as speech. I'm talking about the Free and Open Source QBrew Homebrew Recipe Calculator.

    [Hey, it's shameless self-promotion, but beer related stories don't appear on Slashdot that often]

    You don't even need to know how to brew, because it comes with a brewing primer. To be honest, while the software is free as in pretzels, brewing ingredients might set you back twenty bucks for a two case batch, but that twenty buck is worth it. Now go and make some "Beer Found to be as Healthy as Wine".

    [Now I'm starting to feel ashamed about this shameless self-promotion, better wrap up quick]

    It's even free for Windows and Mac (but is much cooler under a Free and Open system like Linux or BSD). A new release is due within the month, but why wait? Build now and avoid the rush...

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  103. Resveratrol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The key ingredient in wine, red wine in particular, is Resveratrol Above all, resveratrol is able to neutralize free radicals, which can damage DNA and may lead to cancer onset. Resveratrol inducesautophagocytosis : causing the cell to eat itself.
    Beer doesn't have resveratrol

  104. But "lite" beer isn't as good by ssclift · · Score: 1
    Trevithick said that while the so-called light and low-carb beers may contain fewer calories, they're not as potent in their anti-oxidant levels.

    S'pose that means our Southern Cousins will just have to come to the Great White North for our healthier beer, eh? :-)

    I always knew we drank better beer for a reason... :-}

  105. A word from Darl McBride by ArcticCelt · · Score: 3, Funny
    I just been informed by my lawyers about this thread going on and want immediately to point out before more damage is done to our intellectual property that we owns free beer and that the open beer movement is violating our IP.

    Darl McBride SCO (Scamers, Crooks and Opportunists)

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    1. Re:A word from Darl McBride by jdray · · Score: 1

      Give it time. An open beer that doesn't find a consumer quickly goes stale and people lose interest. Furthermore, IP no matter which kind of beer I consume.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  106. Free as in Radicals! by argent · · Score: 1

    What's the FSF's official position on this, if free beer inhibits free radicals?

  107. *blurp* by kennycoder · · Score: 1

    Dring with moderation.. even if it's in industrial quantity

    --
    Fucking a fat girl is like riding a scooter... it's fun 'til someone sees you.
  108. Beer as health food! by MadMorf · · Score: 1

    I'm ahead of the curve...

    I always knew beer was health food....

    Mmmm, beer....

    (No, really, lots of Vitamin B!)

  109. Oh yeah.... by deadgoon42 · · Score: 1

    Pfssst.... (gulp)(gulp) I new that... (gulp)(gulp) ...aaahhhhh.

    --

    Smeghead every day of the week.
  110. Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I think i had a premonition of this article 5 years ago.... when i started having a beer everyday ;)

  111. Re:Interesting.... (OT) by Achoi77 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I used to work at a wine shop, and one of the new periodicals we used to receive was nutritional/chemical breakdown of about 100 or so different wines from all over the world. They had all different kinds of ratings, from what kinds had the most carbs (yes carbs), calories, and a whole slew of antioxidants with long Organic Chemistry-like words that I don't bother to remember. From that list, I've sorted a few things out (note, these are just based on rough estimates from the graphs, and off the top of my head from roughly 2 years ago):

    White wines generally has fewer calories than red wines, but also has less antioxidant content than reds as well. The exception to the calorie count will be dessert wines, which have so much sugar in them it's pointless compare them to reds anyway. Also, not to put a damper toward white wine drinkers, but almost all 'light' whites are on the bottom of the list. These include Sauvignon Blanc and Rieslings (from almost any region, but veering towards colder regions like Alsace and Germany). Of the whites, the only wines that seem to rank well in antioxidant count(among other whites - none rank well against reds) are alcoholic, tannic chardonnays(from wood barrels) from very sunny regions, like Chile and Australia. I guess the sugar content helps there in the fermentation process.

    Red wines with more tannins were generally ranked higher on the antioxidant list. I haven't really checked whether the tannin count is from the barrels they aged in, or the grape skin itself, but the highest ranking 'healthy' red wines listed were from chile and some parts of australia. But there were plenty from france and California as well.

    Of the reds, small sized grape varietals seems to have more 'good stuff' in them; Most of the wines up on the list were Cabernet Sauvignon, some Cabernet Franc, and the occasional Shiraz/Syrah. Absent from the list (or I just don't remember seeing any) was primitivo/zinfandel, along with pinot noir. Most of the merlots were on the bottom of the list.

    In terms of alcohol content, the 'healthiest' wines had the highest amount of alcohol in them, generally all above 14-15 percent. I'm guessing this is due to the length of time the wines are allowed to stay in the barrels(forgive my lack of winespeak, it's been a while). Also, very very few steel barrel wines ranked high in terms of antioxidant content and 'other stuff.'

    I guess that's about it atm. If you want to drink healthy, make sure to aim for heavy, tannic wines made from the small grape varietals that have been aged in wood, which happens to have lots of calories, and lots of alcohol(disclaimer:there is no scientific basis on anything I've just said, this is all based off of my experience). :-) I haven't RTFA as of yet, but I'm curious of the types of beer high up on the list of 'goodness' reflect the wine criteria for 'goodness.' In particular the 'aged, high calorie, alcoholic' portion of it.

    One thing about heavy tannic wines: in my experience I've gotten the worst hangovers from them. I'm guessing it's from the tannins themselves, as light reds and whites don't affect me nearly as much.

    and not to be a downer on your post, but if I was looking to get a quick hit, my suggestion would be to aim straight for the vodka (not that I'm advocating that or anything). Vodka has some of the highest alcohol/dollar ratio making it super cheap, plus (if you buy good vodka) is has very little impurities so you don't have to worry too much about hangovers. And, it's pretty low on the calorie count compared to wine and beer. The problem with vodka is that because it's so clean, people have a hard time judging whether or not they have had enough.

    I used to drink wine very heavily, so I've built quite a tolerance to alchohol. I don't drink as often as I used to, but every once in a while I enjoy having a beer or a glass of wine, and I notice that I get a nice little buzz, even with my heavy tolerance. Man, work must be more stressful than I thought. :-P

  112. Oh, Western! by BSDevil · · Score: 1

    Off all the Universities in Canada who would do a study and determind beer is good for you, it had to be Western. That in itself makes this story awesome.

    (For the non-Canucks out there, Wetsren is considered to be a massive party school in Canadian university circles)

    --
    Cue The Sun...
  113. Sponsored by... by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1

    This message brought to you by Labatt's brewing co. who reminds you to drink responsibly...

    --
    /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  114. Oh, GOD! by thegnu · · Score: 1

    Don't be such a party-pooper.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  115. A Guide to Better Beer by Joey7F · · Score: 1

    Since we are on the subject of beer, and I happen to be a beer geek, I thought I would give you a few recommendations

    If you are used to drinking beers like American Budweiser, Miller, Coors, etc you would likely find Pilsner Urquell, Czechvar (the original Budweiser from the Czech Republic) etc.

    If you dig Guiness, I recommend Young's Oatmeal and Chocolate Stout.

    If your thing is Heineiken(sp?), then you are beyond hope...

    Next time you are at the store this winter, try Sierra Nevada Celebration, which is possibly my favorite beer of all time, and it is fairly available.

    If you find yourself becoming interested in brewing, or the pursuit of interesting ales, try beeradvocate.com as they are the slashdot of beers.

    --Joey

    PS Paulaner's, Spaten's, and Sam Adam's Oktoberfest beers are great and are available for a limited time right now :)

    1. Re:A Guide to Better Beer by norkakn · · Score: 1

      Ever tried Bell's Beer out of Kalamazoo?

    2. Re:A Guide to Better Beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Czechvar (the original Budweiser from the Czech Republic)

      Hmmm, marketing... it'll allways be "Budweiser Budvar" to me. Personally, when I'm not drinking Guinness, I'm fond of the odd pint of Old Speckled Hen or Old Peculier. But the best rule, I think, is to stay away from beers where the brand is more important than the beer...

  116. thinkgeek shirt by WhitePanther5000 · · Score: 1

    $> cd /pub
    $> more beer

    find the shirt here!

    1. Re:thinkgeek shirt by WhitePanther5000 · · Score: 1
  117. Remember eggs? by Xabraxas · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is great news! I am immediately going to go out and drink as much beer as possible before they change their minds and decide beer is bad for you again.

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
  118. The Wave at U.W.O. by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1
    It's *really* weird to see not only my home town but my school on the front page...

    anyway for anyone at UWO already I believe this gives us yet another reason to celebrate the $2.50 pint on fridays at The Wave. Heh, makes this could be a way to show all those cute Health-Sci chicks that we are interested in our health. ;)

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  119. Man, that's the job I'd take in a heartbeat by melted · · Score: 1

    Where do I apply for a researcher position to test the effects of alcoholic beverages and pretty women on my health?

  120. Wet Blanket by Avery+Mahan · · Score: 1

    Some nice fresh Muenchen brew? Excellent! Guiness on tap? Spectacular! But I'm in the middle of a divorce because of my spouse's alcoholism, and beer is her drink of choice. I miss my beer, but I just can't manage to drink it anymore. There have been too many nights I've had to tell my kids "leave Mommy alone, she's having a bad night"...enjoy, mates, but be careful. You don't want your kids answering the phone and saying, "Daddy's too shitfaced to talk to you right now."

  121. Heh... by sbszine · · Score: 1

    And he was probably wearing leather shoes at the time as well : )

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  122. An interesting quid pro quo: by euxneks · · Score: 2, Funny

    Interestingly, the researchers have found that only Canadian beer has this healthy benefit.

    *wink

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  123. Amazing! by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    Grains and grapes are both good for you even if you let them rot... er, I mean ferment. Of course alchohol in ANY quantity is not good for you.

    Gee, I wonder who funded this one...

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:Amazing! by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Actually, small quantities (i.e. a drink or two) of alcohol can have beneficial effects in that it can have a blood-thinning effect that prevents blood clots that can lead to heart attack and stroke.

      It's not all that great for your liver, of course, but the liver is more than capable of dealing with a couple drinks a day in addition to its normal duties.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  124. Also healthy for others by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    Firgure this is having a beer (or two or..) drops your stress level then you are less likely to up-and rm -f /dev/moron or /dev/coworker (redundent??)

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  125. as discovered by russian researches ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    nothing kills free radicals like a good shot of ice-cold Stoly. A join russian-british team plans to test chasing Stoly with Guinness. I've already tried it, and I can tell you - it kicks the shit ouf of all free radicals I ever had. Give it a shot (yeah, pun is intended).

  126. Not 100% beer related, but still funny by algae · · Score: 1

    A Texan, a Californian, and a Michiganer are all out camping together. One night, sitting around a fire, the Texan pulls out his bottle of Jack Daniels and takes a long swig, finishing it off. He then tosses the bottle in the air, draws his .45 revolver, and shoots the bottle, shattering it. "That's the way we do it in Texas," he says.

    The Californian, not to be out-done, pulls out a liter of Merlot and chugs it. He then tosses the bottle in the air, pulls out his glock, and shoots the bottle before it falls. "That's how it's done in California," he says.

    When the two of them are finished, the Michiganer pulls out a bottle of Molson XXX and pounds it. He then throws the bottle over his shoulder, pulls out his 35 special, and shoots the Califonian.

    "Why the HELL did you do that?!?!" yells the Texan.

    "Well, that bottle's worth 10 cents, and we don't need more Californians moving back."

    --
    Causation can cause correlation
  127. Stout is a beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'We were very surprised one drink of beer or stout'

    Beer OR stout? Stout is a subclass of beer! A drink of stout is a drink of beer!

  128. Complex carbs vs. simple sugars by dougnaka · · Score: 1
    Simple sugars are much more likely to kick you out of ketosis, and if you're a real Atkins nut, then you're testing your pee with strips to see if you're in ketosis or not.

    Beer and other fermented drinks have no simple carbohydrates in them, this is simply because the fermentation process is literally the digestion of these by the yeast, whose biproduct is alcohol.

    The reason other carbs are still present is they are too complex for the yeasts involved to break down. Although not directly analagous to our bodies ability to break down said carbohydrates, it is a similar situation, where simple carbs, like sucrose/glucose/maltose are easily absorbed.

    It's worth noting that my father is an Atkins nut, and he works closes with a cell biologist who has authored over a dozen books on human cellular biology, and most of my information is from one of them.

    Also, there have been many other studies about the benefits of alcohol that have been recently published, and I think doctors should be recommending that everyone should be downing the equivelent of 2 beers a day for their health.

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
    1. Re:Complex carbs vs. simple sugars by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Some of your information is not entirely correct. Beer is quite high in maltose, a disaccharide consisting of two glucose molecules joined by 1->2 glycosidic bonds. Your body contains enzymes that can catabolize maltose into glucose quite rapidly. All other things being equal, maltose will be converted to blood glucose even faster than sucrose (table sugar) will.

      Why is that a problem? Insulin is released by the body in response to blood sugar increases...the faster the blood glucose increase, the more insulin gets dumped into the blood stream. Aside from shuttling glucose in the muscles and liver to clear it from the blood, insulin also plays a role in storage of lipids. This is the basis behind the glycemic index, and why people who eat foods low on the glycemic index tend to be thinner and have lower instances of type-2 diabetes. Ever wonder about the infamous beer belly? This is where it comes from. This is also why type-1 diabetics have that funny little paunch in the front of their bellies even when the rest of them are skinny....the insulin they inject promotes accumulation of belly fat.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  129. No such thing as a healthy food... by DarkMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...only a healthy diet.

    That goes for everything, be it beer, crisps, hamburgers, apples, lettuce, hell - even water [0]. Get it out of balance, and it's a problem.

    Accordingly, some bad qualities != Unhealthy. For example, my natural [1] diet is too low in salt [2]. So, the odd bag of crisps is not a bad thing [3] for me. On the other hand, I know someone whose got high blood pressure - a single bad of can push him towards the danger area - it's a very bad thing for him. Most people, are in the middle.

    With that in mind, what does this research actually mean, for the average person? Bugger all. The odd beer won't hurt, and hey, has some good points too. Too much is still bad.

    May I reccomend, "Total diet approach to communicating food and nutrition information", J Am Diet Assoc 2002;102:100, available from
    http://www.eatright.org/Public/GovernmentAffairs /9 2_adar_0102.cfm
    for some further reading.

    And, if your looking for antioxidents, eat more raw fruit and veg. Particular foods may have more than others, but, frankly, if you are worried about antioxident intake, then either any will help, or your micromanaging your food intake excessivly. The human body is not a brittle thing - we've lasted this long by being able to live on a range of inputs, so just eat a broad range, and let the body do it's thing.

    [0] Although, granted, drinking too much water is damn hard to do without some other contributry factor.
    [1] By natural, I mean the diet I would eat if I didn't really think about it - just eat what I want, when I want.
    [2] By too low, I mean averages 500mg of salt daily. Reccomended is 1-3g, recommended limit 6g.
    [3] Better would be to have it more evenly distributed, prehaps.

    1. Re:No such thing as a healthy food... by cozziewozzie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd go even further and say that there is no such thing as a healthy diet, only a healthy lifestyle (which includes a diet).

      Different people have completely different needs from their diets, depending on their lifestyles. There is nothing wrong with eating craploads of sugars and complex carbs if you are going to use them all in the course of the day.

      Many athletes have diets which would make an average person unhealthy. Your diet has to match your lifestyle.

  130. Brew your own by dougnaka · · Score: 1
    It's surprisingly easy, and if you buy your own ingredients you could get $.50/bottle easily

    I don't know the current conversion from American DOLLARS to Canadian PESOS, so Canadian it's probably $17/bottle..

    (joke above people, I was in Canada a month ago)

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
    1. Re:Brew your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My last batch - (US dollars)
      Yeast and Hops Pellets - $3
      Nine pounds Amber/Dark malt extract - $16
      Bottles - Free.

      $19 for fifty three bottles of relatively heavy beer (5 gallon batch). About 36 cents a bottle.

    2. Re:Brew your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, I meant ale, not beer.

  131. This is actually true by Luchio · · Score: 1

    Labatt Breweries and Guinness really funded this research. Here goes objectiveness. /Junk Science

    1. Re:This is actually true by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1
      Yes, a beer company may not have much, uh, "objectiveness."

      But you know, maybe you ought to evaluate the study itself before you call it junk science.

  132. Brilliant by urbaer · · Score: 1

    Don't drink six beers at one time? Brilliant!

  133. Beer is could be good for your body but.. by FractalPenguin · · Score: 0

    It is obviously bad for your brain. Anyone knows it. So that means if you drink alcohol you gain the healthy body and you lose the brain cells. I don't think I will lose my brain cell over the stupid body...

  134. Atkins as a 'hack' by DarkMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Atkins diet, as descibed by the various books and articles from Atkins, is not that bad, in principle. Let me distil down the logic behind it:

    1) People eat too much.
    2) Eating less just makes you hungry. Ergo, it's difficult.
    3) If you look at the rates of ``fullness'' to calories, carbohydrates are way down the list.
    4) Thus, if you skip the carbs for a while, it lets the body get used to lower total volume of food, without feeling hungry.
    5) After the body is used to lower volumes of food, replace the highly energy dense foods with low energy density foods.
    6) Loose weight.

    Thus, the whole diet is just a hack, to get people to eat less without going through the tough phase of being hungry at the start.

    Note that step 4 is to ``skip'' the carbs. That is, eat the steak, and the veg, skip the fries. Not, eat a bigger steak in place of the fries. That defeats the point.

    When viewed in this manner, the Atkins approach has some merit.

    Of course, as we all know, when you take a hack, and run with it for a long period, it creates it's own problems. Hack's work for a short period, to get a job done, and then should get refactored into something more wholistic.

    What really gets my hackles up is when people order a meal, skip the starchy part, but order a double 'non starchy' part. Way to miss the point!

  135. Re:you are drinking the wrong beer!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Try something from x/russsian states called "baltica"

    Ah, yes, Baltica brings back memories. I especially like Baltica 6, the porter.

    If you want cheap alchohol, buy vodka in Russia. They sell it by the liter with twist-off caps that are clearly not designed to be put back on.

  136. MOD PARENT UP by HeelToe · · Score: 1

    We're so instant gratification few of us Americans with a weight problem can stand it taking time and effort to resolve.

    I once lost 90 pounds over 18 months, gradually, with patience, and exercise.

    Of course, since moving to WI, I've put 30 back on, but hey, I'm moving back east and decided it's a change point to put exercise back into my daily existence.

  137. yes this means we can drink a lot more by beefcake101 · · Score: 0

    this is the best news i heard all day. of course beer is better than wine. So this means we can drink a lot more right?

    --
    www.angelfire.com/dc2/stockman/index.html http://www.FreeFlatScreens.com/default.aspx?refere r=87176
  138. Some wines are more equal than others. by serps · · Score: 1

    LandLine reports that an Australian winery has developed wine that packs in twice the antioxidants that normal wines do. The winemaker's actually a biochemist, and he has added antioxidant-enriched coffee and other stuff to the range.

    --
    "Einstein argued that [...] God is not capricious or arbitrary. No such faith comforts the software engineer." ~ Brooks
  139. Have another by plopez · · Score: 1

    www.newbelgium.com

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  140. Offtopic????? Mods on crack by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
    If you drink enough Hefe or Weiss (wheat beer for the non-Germans) you can and do get a hangover.

    One important difference is that even after the relaxation of the beer purity laws (Reinheitsgebote), most people prefer the original style with no additives. Without the additives (or with whatever comes naturally), beer is a lot less likely to give you a hangover,

    However, as with any alcohol consumption, rehydration is advisable before sleeping.

    1. Re:Offtopic????? Mods on crack by kavau · · Score: 1
      Offtopic????? Mods on crack

      Hehe... I bet I got that mod for my signature :D

  141. Wow, it got posted! by Matt+Clare · · Score: 1

    ... then I go out for the night and miss watching the discussion unfold.
    I thought slashdoters might like this one. My favourtie comment was:
    "Smashing your head into a wall while taking steroids is as healthy as professional football!"
    I think that sums it up. My problem was that "Beer has the same limited benifits found in wine as long as......" didn't quite fit in the submision box.

    Clearly, we all know alcohal has risks. I hope my next submission is a comparison of Pepsi, Coke, Coffee, Tea, Beer and Wine (maybe a merlot) in a 'which is worst for you' shoot-out. My hope is the black stuff is the healthiest of the bunch.

    --
    .\.\att Clare
  142. Police by taloner · · Score: 1

    "For more info on how beer helps police " ..... I knew it ...

  143. Eat, Drink and Be Healthy by forevermore · · Score: 1

    Eat, Drink and Be Healthy is a book from Harvard Med. that talks about all kinds of things relating to food and health. Aside from debunking the USDA food pyramid, the authors also go on to show that though red wine is good for you, it's actually the alcohol in it that provides the largest health benefit. So, wine, beer or whiskey, men should have 1-2 drinks daily, and women 0-1. Just remember that alcohol (especially beer) is high in carbs, so if you're on one of those misguided low-carb diets, you need to watch out.

    --
    Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
  144. uh...which brain cells? by tuxette · · Score: 2, Funny

    The brain cells in the 10% of the brain we use, or the rest of them?

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  145. Altogether now.... (posix beer) by B747SP · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... everybody say:

    cd /pub
    more beer

    That's all I have to say, thanks for coming!

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  146. Wine is fine. But Liquor is quicker ... by flyingace · · Score: 0

    nuff said !!! cheers

    1. Re:Wine is fine. But Liquor is quicker ... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      in response to your sig:

      i have done rm -rf / and watched my system die (i pressed control and c when i realised i hadn't typed rm -rf /iso

      isn't as brave unless your backup partition was mounted read-write

  147. And yet we speak of the french paradox by aepervius · · Score: 1

    And not of the german paradox (german are big beer drinker as opposed to to French wine drinking habits). AFAIK then French paradox is that the number of cardiac illness being lower in France despite a very fatty food habits, and it is thougth to be partially caused by wine drinking... Or so i remmember. I might be wrong ehre so feel free to correct me.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:And yet we speak of the french paradox by Bruchpilot · · Score: 1

      True, but also other factors need to be taken into account, especially the kind of fat and oil used in Germany and France.

      To clarify this issue a study would be needed comparing for example the cardiac illnesses of french wine and beer drinkers ......

  148. Anything but healthy !! by bruce227 · · Score: 1

    Beer is second only to nuclear waste as threat to humanity since Young Einstein split the beer atom.

  149. Man... I'm seeing things.. by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    In the summary.. "how beer helps police... free radicals.."

    BEER! The saviour of the free world!

  150. Re:Interesting.... (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you've done some really heavy drinking, tolerance to alcohol is usually short-lived (a few days to a week or two after drinking heavily).

  151. Hear that noise? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    That's the sound of thousands of snooty frenchmen spraying wine out through their noses.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  152. Tennis balls are much more dangerous than beer. by raehl · · Score: 1

    Consuming a whole beer will give you a slight buzz, but consuming a whole tennis ball will kill you.

    1. Re:Tennis balls are much more dangerous than beer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just not true, so long as you cut the tennis ball up properly, like it was a fine steak. Trying to swallow a tennis ball whole, like trying to swallow a big stake whole, might well choke you.

  153. 3 steps to drinking! by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    1) Drink beer.
    2) ...
    3) Profit!

    I'm really sorry... I need sleep.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  154. Biggest tip: by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1
    A good number of American "Hefeweizens" are really abominable, IMO. To get a good taste of the style, go for the real German item: here in the Bay Area the ones you find most easily are Franziskaner and Paulaner, and both are good.

    There are decent American hefes, though. Again, this is a Bay Area-centric list: Bison Brewing in Berkeley used to make a pretty awesome Hefeweizen, though their site doesn't mention it anymore, and I haven't seen it for a few years. Pyramid Hefeweizen isn't quite a superb exemplar of the style, but it is very drinkable.

    One non-obvious thing about drinking bottled Hefeweizen: yeast accumulates in the bottom of them bottle. When you serve it, you leave some beer at the bottom of the bottle when you first pour, you swish this remainder around the bottom of the bottle to dislodge the yeast residue, and then you pour the remaining beer along with the yeast. (Well, unless you like to have fewer yeast. Try it both ways, and see what you prefer.)

  155. Forgot one thing. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1
    I bought some last week labeled "wheat beer" that was unfilterd and cloudy...is that the same sort of thing?

    "Wheat beer" is a pretty generic term for beer whose brewing process involves, um, wheat. There's two major traditional styles of wheat beer: Bavarian Hefeweisse, and Belgian wheat beers (called something like Witbier, can't recall).

    In addition, in the US you'll find a number of wheat beers that aren't either of these styles. Some of these are (mis)labeled as "Hefeweizen", but don't taste anything like the real thing. I've had bad experiences with most of these, at least in the left coast.

    For a nice Belgian-style wheat beer brewed in this side of the world, you may try to find some Blanche de Chambly...

  156. it's not the alcohol... by TomasDK · · Score: 3, Informative

    The chemical compounds found in red wine are called resveratrol, polyphenols and anthrocyanidins. Resveratrol is described to be "a potent anti-oxidant (about 20-50 times as effectively as vitamin C alone) and act synergistically with vitamin C enhancing the effects of each. Resveratrol has been demonstrated to have an anti-clotting effect that prevents the formation of thrombi or blood clots in the blood vessels."

    The article I found goes on to explain why alcohol can cause a hangover and why it is bad for the body: "When alcohol is consumed, the alcohol level in the blood increases and produces the intoxication effect. The body then begins "detoxifying" or metabolizing the alcohol. The first step is the conversion of alcohol to acetaldehyde by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase. This happens fairly quickly in individuals who regularly consume alcohol. The second step is the conversion of acetaldehyde into acetate by the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase. This process is a bit slower and leaves a quantity of acetaldehyde in the system for several hours or longer. It is the acetaldehyde that produces most of the undesirable toxic effects..."

    "Acetaldehyde, produced primarily in the liver, but also in other organs to a lesser extent, readily binds to the walls of red blood cells and hitches a ride to all parts of the body including the brain. By attaching itself to the red blood cells, it makes them more rigid and prevents them from entering the smaller capillaries. (The smaller capillaries are much smaller than a red blood cell and the cell is forced to stretch, elongate and squeeze its way through.) This reduces the oxygen supply to most of the cells of the body including the brain. ( The Brain consumes 20% of all the oxygen we breathe). Acetaldehyde also combines with the hemoglobin in the red blood cells further reducing its ability to carry oxygen."

    "In addition to inducing hypoxia (oxygen starvation at the cellular level), Acetaldehyde reduces the ability of the protein tubulin to assemble into microtubules. Microtubules provide a structural support for the neurons and dendrites in the brain and actually transport neurochemicals manufactured in the nerve cells to the dendrites, including genetic material. Without the microtubules, the dendrites gradually atrophy and die off..."

    And the list goes on and on, so it's not the alcohol that is beneficial, but the anti-oxidant resveratrol found in red wine.

  157. Medicinal by webgit · · Score: 3, Informative

    In Ireland, Guinness has long thought to be medicinal. In fact, it was suposedly administered to nursing mothers, blood donors, stomach and intestinal post-operative patients and mothers recovering from childbirth because of this.

    No wonder Guinness used the slogan "Guinness is good for you" for many years in their advertising.

    However, I do think it's a bit cruel that just down wind of St James' Gate (the Guinness Brewery in Dublin) is an old Hospital where they used to treat alcoholics. You would often get a good wiff of Guinness around that area of Dublin, this must have been torture!

    Anyway, I will always love a great pint of Guinness, the fact that it's good for me is just a positive side effect.

    1. Re:Medicinal by autOmato · · Score: 1

      Judging by its awful taste, Guinness must be some kind of medicine. I think that stuff tastes like cold carbonated decaf.

    2. Re:Medicinal by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      Shut your noise, you!

    3. Re:Medicinal by TomV · · Score: 1

      Ah, now, you see, thing with Guinness, if it's stored right and served right it tastes absolutely gorgeous.

      If it's stored wrong or served wrong it tastes like earwax.

  158. Beer haters love American Budweiser by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Actually, Budweiser truly deserves the title 'King Of Beers'. Not the American version, though.

    Hmm... yeah. IMHO The American version actually deserves the title 'Lemonade of Beers'.

    Perversely, I'd probably class the American Budweiser as my favourite beer, but since I dislike beer in general, this really proves my point...

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Beer haters love American Budweiser by kavau · · Score: 1
      LOL, I appreciate you frankness :-)

      Obligatory beer joke:

      Q: What does American beer have in common with making love in a canoe?

      A: .retaw ot esolc gnikcuf s'tI

  159. Scary thought by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Move to Germany. This is standard operating procedure over there: no decent employee cafeteria is lacking beer.

    The problem there is that all such cafeterias are full of drunk Germans.

    Even worse, if it's dress down Friday, they'll all be wearing Lederhosen and dancing to David Hasselhoff's latest album (*)

    (*) Yeah, I know David Hasselhoff hasn't been *that* popular in Germany recently; but it's a reputation you're not going to shake off. In 500 years time, the first music-related question to ask any German will be "Do you like David Hasselhoff?"

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  160. right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about the "French Phenomenon" then?

    also mr. k is not the first to "find" this

    Prof. Walzl/Austria has reported this years ago, and there are many others

  161. Guiness is Good for You ... by foobsr · · Score: 1

    C ?

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  162. and even more on resveratrol... by TomasDK · · Score: 1

    I just found that it's actually wines from cooler regions that have higher levels of resveratrol:

    a study by NYS Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY

    "The New York grape breeding program places a high priority on the development of highly disease resistant grape varieties. Resveratrol, a compound produced by grapes and just a few other plants, is associated with resistance to downy mildew and Botrytis bunch rot in grapes. Moreover, scientific evidence for its role in reducing the risk of coronary disease and cancer is mounting quickly. Our goal was to screen breeding program selections for resveratrol production in order to aid in the development of disease-resistant hybrids which also carry the potential for high resveratrol content. We also sought to identify commercial varieties with high resveratrol production potential. Relative resveratrol levels in leaves and berries of 48 varieties and selections were analyzed. Highest levels of leaf resveratrol were found in Vitis aestivalis, Ill. 547-1 (rupestris x cinerea)..."

    "Seventy red wines submitted by New York wineries were analyzed for resveratrol. The range was from 1 to 46 micromolar resveratrol. A 46 micromolar resveratrol wine is extraordinary. We had considered 25 micromolar the highest possible concentration. We do not yet have an explanation for the cause of this high concentration.

    "New York Pinot Noir averaged the highest in resveratrol of all wine types analyzed. Sixty-five percent of New York Pinot Noir were above 10 micromolar and the average of the seventeen analyzed was 14 uM. New York Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Cabernet Franc wines averaged around 8 uM. Hybrid and American red table wines averaged 4 uM resveratrol."

    "Forty wines from regions other than New York were analyzed. The average resveratrol of New York wines of each wine style was higher than from other growing regions."

    So if I understand this coorectly, the grapes grown in cooler regions are more susceptible to rot than those grown in sunny regions, so their levels of resveratrol to combat rot are higher.

    (on a side note: it seems peanuts also have high levels of resveratrol, so bring on the peanut butter and have a glass of Pinot Noir with that! :P)

  163. In your face! by cazzazullu · · Score: 1
    In your face, France!

    Bob The Belgian

    --
    int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
  164. damn by cazzazullu · · Score: 1
    If beer helps free radicals in the body I don't think I have one radical left (or braincells, it gets confusing...).

    --
    int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
  165. Beer. It's not just for breakfast any more by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm not going to drink alcoholic beverages 3 meals a day.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  166. Good to know by mikrorechner · · Score: 1


    Good to know, as the Oktoberfest is starting on saturday.
    Boy, do I intend to do something for my health there...

    --
    "Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
  167. In other news... by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Marijuana found to be as healthy as hashish.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  168. look, this is NOT cool for my fellow Earthlings by Devster · · Score: 1

    I hope you didnt miss the real issue here. 1. One beer is good. 2. Three beers is really bad. What the heck can I do with one beer?????? ;-)

  169. Not all beers are equal by Danathar · · Score: 1

    yea but is there a difference between drinking a Corona vs a skull crusher or Mckewens at nearly 10% alcohol per bottle.

    If I can only drink one beer then I'd rather drink the latter....

  170. Screw the radicals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill the fanatics!

  171. MOD ALERT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone is modding certain replies to this as Trolls, when they quite simply aren't. I modded a couple of them back up, but keep an eye on them.

  172. Drinking vs Cooking by Ashyukun · · Score: 1

    One thing that I've always wondered about with respect to the 'health benefits' of wine (and now beer)... does the process of cooking it decrease, increase, or have no effect on the benefits? I for one don't particularly like beer or wine as drinks, but do plenty of cooking using them (try replacing the water you normally add when making tacos with red wine some time. Yum!).

  173. scientific method require rpeating the study by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The science method requires that results be repeatable. Students, get those kegs rolling!

  174. Medically good, but 1/day = alcoholic in Govs eyes by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    You go to any government funded Counselling clinic for drugs or alcohol and tell them you drink any amount of alcohol everyday. You will be flagged as an alcoholic or a person with a drinking problem quicker than you can blink. DUI's and offenses that involve drink make up 30 percent or greater of the arrests in this country. The police like nothing more that to here that you had a drink when they come to visit you. That sign, seals and delivers a guilty verdict in front of a judge nearly every time. The official rate of conviction in most alcohol related 'crimes' is above 97%.

    The point is that medically it is deemed as a good thing. Socially it is accepted. But the moral minority in this country (USA) wrote the laws and has made it offensive and the ultimate leverage to remove your ability to defend yourself. Try it sometime. Don't like your neighbor? Next time you see him drink a beer, call the police and say that he took a swing at you. They won't belive him no matter how much he tries to deny it. He will go to jail, and the judge will never believe him because the police will say the smelled alcohol. He will be sentence to some sort of counselling and be labeled a problem drinker. Just watch your back when he comes after you with his 9mm.

  175. Grape Juice works also. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these various article neglect to mention that Grape Juice is just about as healthy (in terms of anti-oxidants) as Red Wine.

    See this CNN.com story for details.

    Considering how (IMHO) revolting beer is, this is a God-send.

  176. So is it the beer or what it's stored in? by calethix · · Score: 1

    from the article...
    "Beer, wine, stout, and matured spirits (rum, whisky, sherry and port), which extract tannins from the oak casks they are matured or stored in, all contain significant amounts of polyphenols. "

    Am I just misunderstanding that or does the majority of the benefit come from the oak casks?

  177. Re:Big Mac is good food by mantera · · Score: 1


    I don't get you guys; I love Big Macs, and whoppers, just give me such a nice burger with large cold coke and fries, and generous amounts of ketchup, and I'd be so happy. They got carboyhydrates, proteins, salad, sauce, starch, and all the good stuff.

  178. Re:mmm (God and Beer and Wine) by Phill+Hugo · · Score: 1

    That's wine...

    1 Timothy 5:23

    Stop drinking only water, and use a little wine because of your stomach and your frequent illnesses.

  179. RTFA Re:I think I speak for all of us ... by D3 · · Score: 1

    Labatt's and Guiness each paid $25,000 to fund the study.

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
  180. every drunk needs another excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your beer are mine.

  181. Re:you are drinking the wrong beer!!! by maita · · Score: 0, Troll
    Try something from x/russsian states called "baltica"


    What exactlly do you mean by "x/russian"? The Baltic States (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia) regained their independence from Soviet Union in 1991. They have their own culture (and it's not even close to Russian culture), languages.
  182. Re: Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re:Interesting.... (Score:5, Informative)
    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 15, @08:15PM (#10261638)
    You can already get a 5 liter box of 12% alcohol wine for 6 bucks.

    Only an alcoholic would mod this informative.


    This proves it. The mods are a bunch of drunks.
  183. It's The ALCOHOL! by lperdue · · Score: 1
    I wrote a book on this back in 1992 and all the research shows that ETHANOL in MODERATE quantities accounts for the maximum health benefit.


    There are now several hundred, NONconflicting, peer-reviewed studies that show that moderate alcohol consumers live longer than either heavy drinkers or abstainers.


    My book is out of print now, but it's free to read and share at: http://www.french-paradox.net