Slashdot Mirror


Price Drops For Mac mini Upgrades

RustNeverSleeps writes "Apple has just lowered prices on certain build-to-order options on the Mac mini. The combination Bluetooth and AirPort Express option has gone down to $99 from $129, 1 GB RAM upgrades have been reduced to $325 from $475 and the price of an upgrade from a 40 GB hard drive to an 80 GB hard drive has been reduced to $50 from $90. Also, the original 4x SuperDrive has been upgraded to an 8x drive for the same price. Interesting that they dropped prices so soon after release. Perhaps Apple actually listened to people complaining about overpriced upgrades."

886 comments

  1. this goes against.... by Frymaster · · Score: 1, Insightful

    this goes against the apple business model of the last six or seven years: offer a "cheapish" mac and make a thin margin on it. make it a self-contained widget that the avg joe can't muck about in easily and then reap the fat margin on the upgrades.

    1. Re:this goes against.... by coolfrood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if you consider the lowering of prices, the fact remains that you could spend $400-$500 to bring the Mac Mini up to a reasonable configuration by today's standards. IMHO, this doesn't go against their business model.

    2. Re:this goes against.... by sgant · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmmm...

      For 700 bucks I get a DVD burner, 80 Gig HD and the best OS on the planet.

      I would never buy the RAM upgrades form Apple, nor would I do the same from any maker. I buy my RAM from the cheapest source possible, which usually ISN'T the maker. So what are we talking about here, another $125 for a full Gig of RAM now.

      $825 for a killer system. That's only 125 to "bring the Mac Mini up to a reasonable configuration".

      Now, you may think me a Mac zealot, but in fact, I build and maintain computers from scratch running Linux. I haven't owned an Apple product in about 8 years. I've used them quite a bit in my old job, but they were always "overpriced" for me. That's really no longer an excuse.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    3. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac Mini 1.2GHz : $499
      Wireless + Bluetooth: $99 *
      512MB RAM instead of 256MB: $75
      Wireless Keyboard and Mouse: $99 *
      Keyboard and Mouse: $58 **

      Total Wireless: $772 *
      Total Wired: $632 **

      Remember configuring a low-end Dell crate to be decent will also add on money.

      * Only for Wireless configuration =(e.g., kitchen computer)
      ** For Wired configuration (i.e., on a desk near an ethernet port)

    4. Re:this goes against.... by nickfrommaryland · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It has been my experience that there are many users out there who simply don't care about having a high-end computer, or, if they do, they don't have any need for it. For example, I've seen people who have spent $3,000 on a high-end G5 tower, dual processor etc., and only ever use Safari and Mail. The Mini should be a perfect computer for these people, even out of the box. Just my $.02.

    5. Re:this goes against.... by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      "$825 for a killer system."

      The mac mini is hardly a "killer system".

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    6. Re:this goes against.... by Klar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I build and maintain computers from scratch
      Wow, you must be crazy smart, I hear CPU's are real hard to make from scratch.

      Just messin.. $825 is a pretty good deal for a mac tho. If I had the extra cash, I think I'd be all over it. Where did you find a gig ram for $125? Best mini stuff i could find was here.

    7. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not always, I got my laptop upgraded when i bought it, worked out cheaper :D I got discount cuz i installed my own os and not theyre crap also, but yuo need to tell them. Sure by all means shop around but dont cut off the Vendor for upgrades as they can sometimes be cheaper.

    8. Re:this goes against.... by buttersnout · · Score: 0

      You know, I've seen a lot of tests where it's been shown that computers perform better in benchmarks when you buy more expensive ram even if its the same kind. If you understand the manufacturing process this makes sense. It's only a shame I'm too lazy to look up the tests and provide the URLs.

    9. Re:this goes against.... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Where is your ram from? I am waiting for my mini to arrive and I want to upgrade to a gig. I can't find a gig stick of PC2700 for $125.

    10. Re:this goes against.... by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      While I wouldn't call you a zealot, I do think you glossed over one thing: CPU speed. No, most people don't need half the speed their computers have, but $825 (not including monitor, keyboard, etc) isn't exactly my idea of a "cheap" system. For that money I would expect a faster CPU. More video memory would be nice too.

      Of course, I assume that small size and running quietly are two of the Mac mini's big advantages, and a faster CPU might cause problems there. Still, I don't know, it just seems to me that the Mac mini's specs seem low end. Couldn't they have put a G5 in there? Yes, I'm sure that the build quality and being able to run OS X is worth something, but somehow it still doesn't seem right.

    11. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, your average Dell box could crush a Mini totally. This is America, bigger is better dammit!

    12. Re:this goes against.... by lscotte · · Score: 5, Funny

      For 700 bucks I get a DVD burner, 80 Gig HD and the best OS on the planet.

      Ah, so you did exactly what I did - bought a nice Athlon system and installed Linux. Good choice!

      --
      This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
    13. Re:this goes against.... by donnyspi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      RAM is one thing that I don't scrimp on. High quality RAM made by reputable companies is very important. The last thing you want it to have to troubleshoot problems caused by bad RAM.

    14. Re:this goes against.... by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      depends what you define as killer... It's not a speed deamon but sure is small and quiet and discreet. That's killer to me.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    15. Re:this goes against.... by thiophene · · Score: 1

      check DealRam.com. They usually have pretty good prices for ram. It looks like $165 is the cheapest they have 1GB ram though.

    16. Re:this goes against.... by vasqzr · · Score: 1

      Apple's done similar moves before. And been successful.

      The iMac came out, it was what, $999, and it only had 32MB/4GB/233MHz, no real expandability

      The Mac Classic came out, $999, only 8MHz

    17. Re:this goes against.... by badmammajamma · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah...too bad that's not what people are thinking when they are talking about "killer" systems. Please dude, that's totally weak and you know it.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    18. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try pricewatch

    19. Re:this goes against.... by BlueTooth · · Score: 4, Funny

      I assume by crush you mean "To press between opposing bodies so as to break or injure." [dictionary.com]?

      --
      SPAM
    20. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple just tosses in Hynix memory.

    21. Re:this goes against.... by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Where's the screen? Keyboard? Mouse? Add these on and you're around $1000 easily.

    22. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1988 called. They want their business models back.

    23. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same as any vendor.

      Dell, Compaq, and Micron had a 486 dx2/66 with 4mb ram for $999 at one time.

    24. Re:this goes against.... by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Good luck installing the RAM. It's not beyond the realms of difficulty, but as the article shows, neither has it been made very easy.

      The Mac Mini specs also say that "Memory, AirPort Extreme and internal Bluetooth upgrades must be performed by an Apple Authorized Service provider; fees may apply.". In light of the assurances in the article this may not be true for memory but it certainly is for the other components.

    25. Re:this goes against.... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      The original iMac was $1499. I bought one on the first day it came out. 3 months later, they came out with Rev B. that had a 6MB Rage Pro video card instead of the 2 MB Rage 2c.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    26. Re:this goes against.... by root-kun · · Score: 1

      80 GByte harddrives have been outdated for 2 years, and the 40 gb basic drive is just SAD. Personally I think if they double the HD sizes I would buy one of these units for a cute OSX box, even if its just a G4....

    27. Re:this goes against.... by paanta · · Score: 1
      this goes against the apple business model of the last six or seven years: offer a "cheapish" mac and make a thin margin on it. make it a self-contained widget that the avg joe can't muck about in easily and then reap the fat margin on the upgrades.

      Your average joe can't muck about in ANY computer easily. You should watch my grandma try to swap a motherboard or a hard drive. Sheesh. STUPID OLD WOMAN, LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SOCKET 603 AND SOCKET 423!
    28. Re:this goes against.... by agraupe · · Score: 1

      perhaps he has used one at school/work? I haven't owned a mac (well, a powerbook with linux isn't quite a mac) but I still have used and like OS X.

    29. Re:this goes against.... by Deviate_X · · Score: 1

      I would also add Hard Drive performance to the list of things glossed over, OSX performs terribly in anything less than 512mb and even worse when its swpapping out to a sub-5000 RPM storage.

    30. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then spent 2 days wondering why the DVD burner didn't work before realising that it had to be configured as a SCSI device, and then trying to work out one of the myrial over-complex cdrecord interfaces.

    31. Re:this goes against.... by bynary · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they have put a G5 in there?

      No, because that would eat into their iMac sales, and I would imagine would also generate alot more heat. It would also raise the cost significantly. This is not meant to be a speed demon. The G5 is Apple's flagship processor. Dell isn't putting Xeons in their $499 machines.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    32. Re:this goes against.... by lamz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow, you must be crazy smart, I hear CPU's are real hard to make from scratch.

      You don't know the half of it! One time I was painstakingly hand-soldering a 68040, when I accidentally dropped my pince-nez. Well, when I got back to my work, I had inadvertently given the chip a half turn, and before I knew it I connected pin 25965 to 52692! That took me even longer to figure out than the time I baked the hard drive platters a little too long.

      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    33. Re:this goes against.... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I don't want to have to sort through a stack of "super deals" that are just there to lure me to a site which has a warning that I shouldn't ever buy generic ram.

    34. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the quality of the stick is all about what is imprinted on the chips. Come on...they have a major contract that requires quality assurance measures. Going to pricewatch and buying from the cheapest vendor with "hynix" in the listing is not the same thing.

    35. Re:this goes against.... by sgant · · Score: 2, Informative

      For me, this is a killer system. It's not weak, and I know what I mean by a killer system.

      Yes, this is a killer system.

      It's not a quad processor 4 GIGA-PLEX-ZOWIE-BAM with optional tinted windows and a 1GIG 32x AGP-ultra mega 6D graphics card...but show me a $825 system that is.

      Being $825 and having the features that it does in itself makes it a "killer system". SO STFU.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    36. Re:this goes against.... by dhuff · · Score: 2, Informative

      A posting on MacWorld's forum on the Mini has an entry from someone who took their's apart and discovered a 5400 rpm drive instead of the 4200 rpm part. (not to say all of them come this way)

    37. Re:this goes against.... by log0n · · Score: 4, Informative

      I declare shenanigans.

      I ran my PB17 for about 4 months (512mb, 4200? rpm HD, 1.33 ghz cpu) and it was plenty fast doing real world work (daily on-site video production for a public school system).

      Is this the new angle of attack for the Mac-haters?

    38. Re:this goes against.... by sgant · · Score: 1

      If you haven't owned a MAC in 8 years how can you pronounce it "the best OS on the planet"

      As I said in my post, where I worked I used Macs everyday. I used to be in the pre-press business.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    39. Re:this goes against.... by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      Damn, I wish I had mod points to give you a +1 Funny.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    40. Re:this goes against.... by fitten · · Score: 0, Troll

      For $100 more I can get a nice Dell laptop that is much faster. In fact, I did... Dell 600m Celeron-M 1.3GHz.

    41. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      it's a 2.5" hard drive asswipe. capacities larger than 80gb are only just now appearing, and are still quite rare in this form factor.

    42. Re:this goes against.... by znu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, I suspect if you dropped a Dell tower on a Mac mini, you'd probably end up with some small scratches on the mini, and a big dent in the bottom of the Dell. The mini is constructed of fairly thick aluminum and polycarbonate (the stuff that makes bullet-proof glass bullet-proof). The Dell is constructed of sheet metal and rather cheap plastic.

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    43. Re:this goes against.... by numbski · · Score: 1

      How about $85?

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    44. Re:this goes against.... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Celeron at 1.3 Ghz compared to G4 at 1.25.

      If anything is much faster, it's the G4

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    45. Re:this goes against.... by numbski · · Score: 1

      $85

      Not too shabby.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    46. Re:this goes against.... by avdp · · Score: 1

      No, that's not true. It's not what most "people" think. To me a "killer" system or a "killer" app refers to a one that is good. And goodness is subjective.

      I think the mac mini is "killer" for its size, look, and quieteness in spite in its less than stellar performance.

    47. Re:this goes against.... by bonch · · Score: 1

      I don't have a choice, as a friend accidentally forgot to request my memory upgrade at the retail Apple store. :) From what I've seen, all you need is a putty knife and a little bit of firm prying. I've taken apart an entire NES just to clean it, so I think I can handle prying off some plastic case held down with snaps. Clearly, it's not impossible.

    48. Re:this goes against.... by fitten · · Score: 1

      Haven't seen many benchmarks? Cinebench shows my other laptop (1.4GHz Banias) is flat 2X as fast across the board than a 1.25GHz PowerBook. The Dothan Celeron-M has the same L2 as the Banias and has the improvements of the Dothan core. So, unless the Mac mini is 2X as fast as a PowerBook, the Dell 600m is faster.

    49. Re:this goes against.... by lamz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kensington has a nice deal on a keyboard and mouse for the new Mac mini. The mouse is a two-button scroll-wheel deal.

      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    50. Re:this goes against.... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      that is exactly what I am talking about. Will it work with a Mac mini? I doubt it given that it says right there that it works with almost nothing.

    51. Re:this goes against.... by numbski · · Score: 1

      All you need is a putty knife to undo some clips on the bottom. I have a video showing how to do on my home desktop, not here. I could probably shell in and put it up on my site, but I don't feel like getting /.'ed.

      If you want it, drop me an e-mail and I'll give you a link. It's pathetically simple.

      It's like the old story about billing someone $300 for 10 minutes of work, and one tap with a hammer for someone who was trying to fix a problem for days. The detailed invoice stated:

      $40 - 10 minutes of labor
      $260 - knowing where to tap

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    52. Re:this goes against.... by f()bz · · Score: 1

      i agree. i've had kernel panics, weird gui treatment (little pixel "snow" jiggles on the edge of windows), and really strange audio anomolies being written into audio files, all due to:

      BAD RAM.

      all examples were running mac os x on g4 procs. once was a 1gb chip in a powerbook g4, once was a 512 chip in a g4 agp tower. i highly recommend name brand, or at least a reseller that will replace ram in a timely and cost efficient manner.

      ~fab

    53. Re:this goes against.... by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      Too bad you mix useful objective information like numbers in with useless subjective opinion like "best OS on the planet" and "killer system". Even with those upgrades, I don't consider the box even remotely "killer". How do you define "best OS"?

      I can build what I consider to be a much more capable machine for less thanks to good ol' commodity hardware. I'll have to do the comparison again vs. a SFF PC with a Sempron CPU, the last time I did price/performance analysis was with the old ludicrously expensive upgrade pricing.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    54. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch the TV program Mythbusters polycarbonate does not equal bullet-proof. And since Apple states to place objects on top of the mini or you might have problems ejecting a CD, then I would say dropping a Dell tower on the mini would do so pretty good damage.

    55. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      80 GByte harddrives have been outdated for 2 years, and the 40 gb basic drive is just SAD. Personally I think if they double the HD sizes I would buy one of these units for a cute OSX box, even if its just a G4....


      Translation: could you just GIVE me the box? You guys at Apple are running a charity, right?

      Go buy a Dell and suffer with linux, goat boy!
    56. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a dual athlon rig that I use for gaming. It's noisy as hell - but when the speakers are going, it doesn't bother me. This machine is NOT going into my truck - that's where the Mac Mini. Built in unix, controllable from my iBook, small enough to fit in a DIN slot. For the small computers market (I was looking at building a mini-itx box before the Mini came out) it's killer.

    57. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Except that you're not considering the fact that a) the target market is not going to be filling this thing up with ripped music and DVD's and b) other considerations force the machine to use a 2.5" disk where the capacities you want are not (afaik) available. Typical Slashdot grandstanding. If you don't believe in purpose-fit systems, why not just say so? It sounds like you want generic hardware with as much power and flexibility as you can afford, not a Mini.

      Even if it had a 160GB disk, you would probably complain that with all that disk space, it doesn't have the CPU to fill it up in a meaningful way. It is the way of first-world society, I guess. "We all want SUV's!" -> "now we want them to ride like cars!" -> "now we want them to be as fast as cars!" This spurs technical advancement, of course, but people never stop to think that just because we can do these things doesn't mean we should. In computing, people do have reasons to use huge amounts of disk space and as much CPU as they can get. Vendors will continue to supply these people. I don't agree with the idea that all efforts should be focused on these goals, though. Yes, yes, cheaper low-end hardware for everyone is driven by the high-end hardware, but the low-end hardware gets pushed off the market so fast that only the geeks browsing Pricewatch end up with it anyway. There's my rant. Thanks.

    58. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For $100 more I can get a nice Dell laptop that is much faster. In fact, I did... Dell 600m Celeron-M 1.3GHz.


      I work with pieces of shit like this all day long.. and I'm here to tell you there's a reason Dell engineers a substantial overage into that seemingly low price: rumor has it that on certain model lines they account for having to replace 20-25% percent of the machine right off the bat. And from what I'm seeing at work, this is correct.

    59. Re:this goes against.... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I just bought a pair of Mushkin DDR, 2 matched sticks of 512, pc3200, for $130 after rebate. Got it from Newegg.com.

    60. Re:this goes against.... by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      Considering the reputation of that website and the poor quality of that RAM, I really wouldn't expect that stick of RAM to work at all.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    61. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're a fucking retard living in the past with kernel 2.4.x. 2.6 brought us out of the hell of scsi emulation remember? No, you don't, because the best trolls are ignorant fools.

    62. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did a price search for PC2700 DDR SDRAM 1GB on pricewatch.com and found both Samsung and Micron for about $150, yestrday I found Corsair for about the same price, but I can't remember where. There was generic and store brand stuff starting at $85, but I am sticking with name brand with a warrantee.

    63. Re:this goes against.... by soldeed · · Score: 2, Informative

      See, this MAC is being marketed to people who already have those things. I assume you have a computer? If your monitor is DVI or VGA compatible, it will work! Hell, you can even hook it up to a TV with the optional S video adapter! Your keyboard and mouse must be of the USB variety, but most are these days, and if you can't find them for cheap, you're not trying very hard. Try a swap meet or a flea market (or Ebay) If you don't mind second hand. Or just get an Emac or an Imac. As the Pretenders sang, Stop your sobbin'

    64. Re:this goes against.... by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For that money I would expect a faster CPU. More video memory would be nice too.


      You may not get "faster CPU" or something of the sort, but you do get a great OS, tiny case made of adonized aluminium, a practically silent computer, great software-bundle and the like. Staring at just few specs (CPU-speed etc.) is pretty short-sighted IMO.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    65. Re:this goes against.... by adam872 · · Score: 1

      The difference there is that with the Mac, the cost of assembling the machine is included in the price. A system you build yourself is done so with the assumption that your time is worth nothing or at the least, very little. I've been looking at building a SFF PC and the Mini works out cheaper, even if I were to build the PC myself. Those EPIA system boards and their peripherals actually start to rack up in price after a while. Companies like CappuccinoPC and LogicSupply will sell you a built to order system, but they are even more expensive. So it looks like a Mac Mini for me...

    66. Re:this goes against.... by Vengie · · Score: 1

      adonized aluminum

      Aluminum that looks like Adonis?

      Granted, it does...but I believe you meant anodized....
      O:-)

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    67. Re:this goes against.... by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 1

      Cheapest price on deal-ram.com for a gig is $192.

      A shop I deal with frequently in Toronto sells 1 gig modules for $234.99 Cdn, or about $190.55 USD.

      That's not $125, but it's still way cheaper than Apple's upgrade.

      BTW one interesting thing about the Mini is that while the average user does not need a full gig of RAM, it is still wise to get it in this machine since it only has one slot. Upgrading later will just leave you with spare memory laying around.

    68. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in spite in its less than stellar performance.

      No shit, everything in that box is 3-5 years old. Would anybody buy a P3 based computer today for $500, even if it looks nice. Hardly.

    69. Re:this goes against.... by badmammajamma · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sweet...a mac nut moderator called me a troll because I had the gnads to say that the mini wasn't a "killer" system.

      Good job! I'm sure Jobs appreciates it.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    70. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just get a real computer instead.

    71. Re:this goes against.... by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      That is incorrect. I have used a shop that will assemble the unit for me. For example, the NCIX.com QUBE a360 can be picked up for a mere $838 CDN ($684.46 USD - they sell to US customers as well, but are based in Vancouver), including:

      1 x SOLTEK QBIC EQ3702A MINI PC ALUMINUM NFORCE2 SOCKETA DDR 2VGA TV 10/100 LAN
      1 x AMD SEMPRON 2400+ PROCESSOR 1.67GHZ SOCKETA 256K 333FSB RETAIL BOX 3YR MFR WARRANTY
      1 x BENQ DW1620 DVD+-RW 16X4X16 DUAL LAYER +R 2.4X BEIGE IDE OEM W/ SW
      1 x SEAGATE BARRACUDA 7200.7 80GB HARD DRIVE ATA/100 8.5MS 7200 OEM
      1 x SAMSUNG 512MB PC3200 DDR400 184PIN OEM 1 x MITSUMI FA404A 7-IN-1 FLOPPY DRIVE & FLASH READER CF/SM/SD/MMC/MS
      1 x MICROSOFT MULTIMEDIA KEYBOARD & OPTICAL MOUSE OEM (WITH SYSTEM ONLY)
      1 x NCIXPC $30 INSTANT REBATE FOR SELECTED MODELS FROM 9/22/04 - 10/31/04
      1 x MICROSOFT WINDOWS XP PROFESSIONAL OEM (WITH SYSTEM ONLY)
      Fully assembled NCIXPC systems come with a 1 year limited parts and labor warranty.

      Unless you need specific aspects of the Mini (or iLife) you can get a SFF PC including OS (by why bother paying for Windows when Linux would do the trick?) for much less than the $832 it could cost to build a Mini with similar hardware (as per a Mini I configured on Apple's US site about 1 minute ago).

      My time is worth a hell of a lot to me, but part of how I choose to spend my time includes the hobby of computers. I'd have fun building it, and would rather build it than have someone do it for me in most cases.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    72. Re:this goes against.... by nofx_3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC from the disections I have seen, the mini only has 1 slot for ram, so you'll need to snag an 1G stick and then you'll need to remove the 256M stick thats already in there. That is a good deal thought.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    73. Re:this goes against.... by kakos · · Score: 1

      Are you implying LInux is the best OS on the planet?

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

      Good one.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

      I'm LOLing here. Thanks.

    74. Re:this goes against.... by Frenetic_Alphabet · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ok, with the current exchange rate on 26 Jan 2005 825.00 Dollars U.S. = 1,015.33 Canadian dollars.

      With that said...

      Here's what I found

      Cache 1MB L2
      CPU Speed 2.0GHz
      CPU Type AMD Athlon 64 3200+
      Graphics Card GeForce FX5500 128MB AGP Card
      Hard Drive 160GB 7200RPM
      I/O Ports See The Features Section
      Included Software Microsoft Works 8.0
      Network Card 10/100 Ethernet
      Optical Drives 16x DVD+/-RW Dual Layer
      Preloaded Operating System Microsoft Windows XP Home SP2
      RAM 1GB PC3200 DDR RAM
      Sound Card Integrated AC 97 Audio
      Speakers Stereo Speakers, Black
      System Bus Up To 1600MHz

      http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/proddetail.asp?lo gon=&langid=EN&dept=1&sku_id=0665000FS10055540&cat id=10607&newdeptid=1/

      All for 999.00 Canadian or 811.73 US

      And this is a pre-built system from an overpriced corporation...You could get this system for probably half that amount if you bought and assembled it yourself.

      I just don't see the draw of the mini...its WAY to expensive for what it's capable of.

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own
    75. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you must be crazy smart, I hear CPU's are real hard to make from scratch.

      It's not as hard as you think. If you can do an ASIC you can do a processor. Get yourself an FPGA and Visit http://www.opencores.org/
      After that you can get started on your own operating system. I would recommend using NewOS as a starting point there. http://newos.sourceforge.net/

    76. Re:this goes against.... by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      For 700 bucks I get a DVD burner, 80 Gig HD and the best OS on the planet.

      Is it really the best OS on the planet? I'm familiar with all it's benefits, however I was recently using a PowerMac G5 and was somewhat disappointed. The time it took to open a new application was longer than I'm used to (on my 700MHz Pentium III). When I tried to open a contextual menu, there was a significant delay that I wouldn't expect from such a fast machine.

      Don't get me wrong, I like OS X a lot. I used to be a mac-only person for the longest time, however if the performance wasn't what I expected on a G5 tower, I can't imagine what it would be like on the less-than-stellar MacMini. I'll still consider it, but I need to see it in person first.

    77. Re:this goes against.... by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the Mac Mini only have a single slot?

    78. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac fanboys would buy an Apple IIe if they could repackage it and make it look cool.

    79. Re:this goes against.... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I've been using it with 384 for nearly two years now with no problems unless I'm running a LOT of stuff, including Photoshop in Classic. I even had it on 256 for a while and while it was a little slow, I wouldn't call it terrible.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    80. Re:this goes against.... by BlowChunx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now, the thing that suprises me most, is that the mini ITX crowd don't all jump up here and defend the Mac Mini...

      You don't have a small form factor, and I hardly doubt that it's quiet. For some people, those are important design considerations. Now if you spec out a mini ITX box (say with a VIA Eden chipset, or whatever they are up to now-a-days...), it would be more relevant.

    81. Re:this goes against.... by Quino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not even remotely the same computer. It's HUUUUUUGE!

      Try making a mini ITX that can sit in the living room (like a Mac Mini) and is of comparable size, *then* you've got yourself a comparison.

      I need a new computer. I've been thinking about what to get, and I can go the cheap, huge, noisy, ugly route (like what you posted), or I can go with an mini ITX or something (the Mac mini is sweet and cheap cheap for what you get, but I want to run Linux -- I'm a fan now!). Also, I'm broke so I may have to live with something similar to what you posted.

      I can get what I really want and spend 700-800 or so bucks, or the cheap route and spend only a couple hundred ... I've not decided. But your comparison sucks. :)

    82. Re:this goes against.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "For 700 bucks I get a DVD burner, 80 Gig HD and the best OS on the planet."

      That's great except ya still have to go monitor shopping.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    83. Re:this goes against.... by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      You may not get "faster CPU" or something of the sort, but you do get a great OS, tiny case made of adonized aluminium, a practically silent computer, great software-bundle and the like. Staring at just few specs (CPU-speed etc.) is pretty short-sighted IMO.

      See, the problem is that I'm not convinced that you can't get all that for less than $825 _with_ a faster CPU and so on. Of course, that leads to the usual PC-vs-Mac pricing flamewars, which I'm trying to avoid.

      Also, I could just as easily say that you shouldn't ignore the specs in favor of stuff like the material the case is made of. You may get a pretty computer, but will the experience of using it be pleasant (e.g. because of the slow processor, limited video paired with graphics-intensive OS, etc.)"?

      What it boils down to is this: the specs aren't exactly impressive. Yes the Mac mini may have other strengths, but that doesn't change the numbers. It's not short-sighted to accurately note those numbers, either. As I pointed out above, they could reflect upon other deeper issues, like whether the user experience is good.

    84. Re:this goes against.... by Frenetic_Alphabet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right, the one I posted is nowhere near as pretty as the mini nor would it be as quiet. I'll give you that. :)
      However, price and performance wise, I still have to go with the junk I posted earlier...and I agree with you there also, the pc I posted was crap but still out performs the mini.

      Yes, yes I know its not small and cute and if that's what you're going for all the power to you.
      Personally I'm more concerned with what it can do as opposed to what it looks like. But hey, to each thier own!

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own
    85. Re:this goes against.... by sydsavage · · Score: 1

      Well, in order to help you make a fully informed decision, are you aware that several linux distributions will run on the Mini? So it would give you the ability to run linux and OS X.

    86. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Linux was just a kernel and not actually an OS.

      If you meant Linux distro in general, they vary widely in quality.

      ---

      My setup (in alphabetical order):

      Debian Sarge
      FreeBSD 4.11
      Windows 2000

    87. Re:this goes against.... by ALpaca2500 · · Score: 5, Informative

      i priced a Mac Mini with all the upgrades, it came out to $1222.

      i priced this at logic Supply:

      Morex 3677 mini-ITX case Silver $85.00
      VIA EPIA MII12000 Mini-ITX Motherboard $214.00
      Notebook 2.5" Hard Drive 80GB $175.00
      Panasonic Slot Loading CD-RW / DVD $99.00
      PC2100 / DDR266 memory 1024MB $290.00
      Microsoft Windows XP Pro with SP2 $175.00
      Netgear WG511 54 Mbps Wireless PCMCIA Card $49.00
      Combo Keyboard, Mouse and Speakers $21.00
      Sub-Total: $1,108.00

      note that the Mac mini has a slightly faster CPU (and i'm willing to bet the G4 will out-perform the Via Eden in most cases). the Mini has a DVD burner as opposed to a DVD-ROM/CD-RW. the Mini has Apple's wireless keyboard.

      so, the Mac Mini price is at least competitive with other small form factor computers, if not regular full size computers.

    88. Re:this goes against.... by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      And that is a great idea.... but as I'm sure you know, not everyone can install and run Linux. Thus, this is a cheap way for Apple to attempt to put their operating system back on top of Windows. I doubt it will ever happen, but I'd use Mac OS X over Windows XP anyday... and I do. Hah. Of course... I run Linux on my PCs also. -_-

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    89. Re:this goes against.... by memco · · Score: 1

      That's generally not the case w/ Apple. Especially for RAM; I bought a 512 stick (I think from newegg) for 1/4 of what Apple would charge.

      --
      Get me a meat pie floater!
    90. Re:this goes against.... by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 2, Informative

      (the Mac mini is sweet and cheap cheap for what you get, but I want to run Linux -- I'm a fan now!


      There are PowerPC ports of Gentoo, Debian, and a few other Linuxes (Linuxen? :-p).


      Feel free to purchase that Mini!!!

    91. Re:this goes against.... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      I've had few problems with a slow hard drive and 128MB of RAM. One thing that does make a huge difference is the error rate on a drive. If your computer is slowing down and showing the spinning beach ball a lot, you probably need to replace your hard drive. My dad's iMac only lasted a few months before the hard drive started dying.

    92. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. The parent said "in anything less than 512mb" and you have 512mb. What the parent meant to say was if your system has 256mb (as in standard config), OS X will use HD to do memory swaps and if your HD is slow, the OS performance suffers. You have enough RAM and therefore, you notice less of the swapping. OS X's performance does scale non-linearly with RAM ammount.

      That said, I have "only" 256mb that I've been planning to upgrade for a while. The OS performance is not as bad as people says all the time and I do abuse my iMac. I do notice the spinning beachball occasionally for a second or two when I keep switching from an application to others, but then again, my iMac comes with a standard desktop HD.

    93. Re:this goes against.... by sydsavage · · Score: 1
      As the Pretenders sang, Stop your sobbin'

      I'll have you know, young whippersnapper, that the Kinks wrote and sang that song a couple of decades before there were any Pretenders.

    94. Re:this goes against.... by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "For 700 bucks I get a DVD burner, 80 Gig HD and the best OS on the planet."

      Which planet are you referring to?

    95. Re:this goes against.... by jinzumkei · · Score: 1

      nice maybe you Linux and OSX guys will battle to the death for that %1 of desktop marketshare and us Windows people will continue to ignore you :)

    96. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason I find the above extremely hard to believe. I have 667 mhz G4 Powerbook on which I often have Photoshop, Dreamweaver, BBEdit as well as my IM apps open and don't have this problem.

      If you're going to complain about Macs at least provide some honest, legitimate complaints.

      For what its worth I have never owned a PC without upgrading the machine after ~ 9 months and I'm going on 3 years with my PowerBook quite happily. I would have never believed it myself as this was my first Mac but I've never been happier.

    97. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I upgraded my ram last night. It's pretty easy once you go out and buy the putty knife. I didn't even scratch the case.

    98. Re:this goes against.... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Hey Steve!

      I just wanted to add that if you do buy aftermarket RAM, it's a good idea to hold onto the factory RAM (and label it and remember where you're storing it) rather than throwing it out or selling it on ebay.

      If, God forbid, you should have a problem that is RAM related at some later date, you'll save yourself time and hassles if you can swap in the factory installed RAM and identify the problem. As fast as the Applecare service is (and it can be pretty damn fast), no one wants to send out their computer and have it sent back unrepaired because the fault was with the 3rd party RAM not covered by Applecare.

      Personally, I think it's better to use 3rd party RAM that comes with a lifetime guarantee, offered by many vendors such as OWC, but I can understand someone not wanting to deal with more than one vendor for customer support and going with Apple's BTO upgrade.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    99. Re:this goes against.... by siphi · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't like to shop here then... http://www.resellerratings.com/seller1867.html (note lower rating)

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    100. Re:this goes against.... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      And if his keyboard/mouse is PS2, PS2->USB adapters start at about $2, and most geeks already have such an adapter in their parts bin.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    101. Re:this goes against.... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      the Mac mini has a slightly faster CPU (and i'm willing to bet the G4 will out-perform the Via Eden in most cases)

      Alright, maybe you haven't actually used VIA's chips in real life, or maybe you haven't used a PowerPC yet.

      My G3 clocked at 300MHz kicks the CRAP out of my 800MHz C3-ezra. The 7447a G4 seems to be comparable clock-for-clock to an AMD Athlon Barton, while the C3 feels more like a watered-down and underclocked P4.

      Trust me, unless you want to do oddball hobbyist stuff and like to toy with a screwdriver, the Mini is a much better deal.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    102. Re:this goes against.... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, if you're talking full size HDsm but the Mini uses notebook sized drives. Let me know how many 160 GB notebook drives you've come across.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    103. Re:this goes against.... by Quino · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I was under the impression that not all the hardware was supported 100% (I probably got the impression from reading /. for what it's worth!)

    104. Re:this goes against.... by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      "I wouldn't like to shop here then... http://www.resellerratings.com/seller1867.html (note lower rating)"

      Agreed! I wouldn't buy from Dell if you paid me.

      This is been posted here before, I'm sure, but Newegg is just about the only place that I give any business to. Check out their rating..

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    105. Re:this goes against.... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Your post perfectly illustrates why there will never be a one size fits all computing solution. Also, your point that you enjoy building as a hobby means that you shouldn't have to calculate your time into a comparison, when you're making the decision.

      For some, the mini will best suit their needs for obvious reasons, for others it won't. You were at least open minded enough to consider the mini.

      Now for the flame:

      That NCIX Cube is not only about 4x-6x larger than a mini, but it's one of the more butt ugly SFF PCs I've ever seen! How can you bear to have it on your desk? =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    106. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sticking with name brand with a warrantee.

      Damn you, spell checker! No substitute for learning!

      When you buy something with a warranty, YOU are the warrantee.

    107. Re:this goes against.... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      I agree. I had 256mb RAM in my 450mhz G3 and OSX ran like a dog doing anything more than chatting and web surfing. Photoshop and Illustrator ran like molasses.

      After upgrading to 512MB, performance was like a new machine... and after obtaining a new 450mhz G4 box with 1GB RAM, OSX ran insanely better (the APG graphics made a huge difference in performance, as well as the altivec, I'm sure).

      I can't really comment on the RPM speed of the HD, but my Powerbook (1ghz G4, 1GB RAM) runs OSX better than any of my desktop machines (fastest: 800mhz G4, 7600rpm, 2GB RAM). I'd prefer to use it over my desktops except for the fact that I've got a dual-monitor setup for my desktop machine and more ram for doing work.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    108. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a loaded comparison if I've ever seen one:

      That's an expensive Eden board - Athlon SFF boards can be had for less.

      You're using a notebook HD, when desktop HDs fit it most SFF cases.

      Don't know if that's a notebook DVD, but desktop DVD-RWs can be had for less (and also fit in most SFFs)

      Holy crap is that DIMM expensive!

      And of course, you're piecemeal builing a system, rather than an OEM job. A better comparison would be against full Shuttle systems and the like.

    109. Re:this goes against.... by MagnusDredd · · Score: 1

      Actually no, the Mac Mini does not have a slightly faster CPU. The G4 stomps all over the Via. The G4 is somewhat faster than a similarly clocked P3 in my experience.

      I have a P3 700, a C3 700, and a G4 733. The G4 is the fastest of the three, the P3 is generally somewhat close (though slightly faster faster as a gaming platform). The Via really is not in the same league. For desktop use it might be ok (noticeably slower), but once you fire up anything requiring CPU power, it goes all to hell. Try doing anything intensive like viewing a very high quality Divx movie on the C3 and you'll see what I mean. Viewing PDFs is much, much faster on the G4 than anything. Seti is significantly faster on the P3. However large speed differences between the G4 and P3 seem to be due to CPU optimizations more than anything else. The C3 on the other hand is just slow.

      BTW I should mention that the C3 is a socket 370, which I bought as a replacement for the P3. The machine now sits in a closet as a server (no CPU fan and low wattage were the deciding factors, not speed). So when I tried the C3 out it was on the same board, same video (radeon 7000), same RAM, etc. The G3 has a faster FSB but also has a radeon 7000.

      To have an equivalent Via as compared to a P3 or G4 you'd have to have one clocked at least 25 - 50% higher than what you are comparing it to. This applies especially for those things that the Mac Mini's core audience uses their machines for. iPhoto, iMovie, Quicktime movies (tho I use VLC or MPlayer), and other creative kinds of stuff. I am fairly sure that a Mini or a P3 would be much faster at web browsing as well.

      I am not in this crowd tho my mom, and mother in law are. They like making cheesy greeting cards and invitations and taking photos of the grandkids, and I'm certain if my mother in law had a mini, instead of a Windows box, I'd be forced to watch waayyyy too many home made movies of my neices.

    110. Re:this goes against.... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      No, because that would eat into their iMac sales, [...]

      I doubt the crossover between the iMac and a Mini markets would be large. One is servicing customers who want a simple, elegant, all-in-one package and the other is servicing customers who already have the supporting infrastructure (screen, keyboard, mouse, etc) and want another computer.

      and I would imagine would also generate alot more heat.

      A 1.4Ghz G5 would put out less heat than the 500Mhz G4s that went into the first PowerBooks. I don't know where this idea of the G5 being some blazing-sun-hot CPU has come from, but it's false.

      It would also raise the cost significantly.

      I doubt a G5 costs Apple much more - if anything - to buy than a G4.

      The G5 is Apple's flagship processor.

      No, the G5 is Apple's *desktop* processor, as evidenced by its presence in the iMac.

      Dell isn't putting Xeons in their $499 machines.

      No-one's asking for a Xeon-comparable chip in the Mini. Dell aren't shipping PCs with P3s in them, either, which is basically what Apple is doing.

    111. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or spent 5 seconds starting up k3b! Dumbass.

    112. Re:this goes against.... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      fact remains that you could spend $400-$500 to bring the Mac Mini up to a reasonable configuration by today's standards.

      Except that's not a fact, but an opinion. What constitutes a "reasonable configuration" is subject to individual users' interpretations. For many people (particularly in the target market), this system will be perfectly adequate right out of the box, with nothing added at all (beyond the display, keyboard and mouse, of course).

    113. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > plenty fast doing real world work

      As a user of a new 1.5GHz PowerBook with 1Gbyte RAM, I have to disagree. Firefox and Thunderbird are painfully slow. I spend more time with the spinning beachball than I do with my wife. Most of the problem is the insanely slow harddrive, but some of it is the processor. Using the PowerBook makes me want to get back home to get back to my 2.4GHz Pentium IV with 7200 RPM IDE drives. If I had a new desktop computer with the 10k Raptor SATA drives, I'd be in even more pain when using the slow PowerBook. I'm sorry, The PB just isn't fast enough yet to use. Maybe when the G5 model comes-out it will be, but it isn't yet.

    114. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In your equotation you are missing:

      - labor cost to put it together
      - the other bundled software (ok the games are irrelevant, but iLife 05 is a MAJOR boon for any user)

    115. Re:this goes against.... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > My G3 clocked at 300MHz kicks the CRAP out of my 800MHz C3-ezra.

      *shrug*.

      My old Pentium II / 233 system kicked the everliving bejeebers out of the
      G3 iMac / 400 at work. But I think that had a lot more to do with the
      amount of RAM than with the CPU, since the PII/233 had 256 MB of RAM, and
      the iMac had just 32 MB. The performance difference was so tangible, you
      didn't have to touch _it_, because _it_ reached out and grabbed _YOU_.
      (And I wasn't even _in_ Soviet Russia.)

      That's generally the case: CPU speed is way less important to performance
      than the amount of RAM. I always go cheap on the CPU and get extra RAM; you
      get better performance that way. Switching back and forth between apps,
      for example, is instant if you have enough RAM; if you don't, it can take
      several seconds.

      So the Mac Mini's being a G4 doesn't bother me a bit; if I were getting one,
      I'd just throw some extra RAM at it. And I'd be pretty tempted to do that
      (despite being up to now a PC user), if I needed a new computer right now,
      but what I've currently got should be good for another couple of years at
      least, so I'm exercising a little self control and not buying one.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    116. Re:this goes against.... by colatek · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you that Apple's prices on ram are a little high but I wouldn't go with the cheapest either. I would find out who is supplying Apple with ram.
      I switched 2 years ago and I have no issue with Apple's pricing of their products.
      I have had very little problems. That is worth it's wait in gold.

      ------

      "Art is making something out of nothing and selling it."
      Frank Zappa - US musician, singer, & songwriter (1940 - 1993)

    117. Re:this goes against.... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Sure, RAM matters a lot, which is why I keep over 512MB in all my systems, including the EPIA and the G3.

      The 'benchmark' I used was compiling software, which the G3 dominated. Considering that the I/O on the systems was so different (2.5" ATA vs 10K RPM SCSI), I know that benchmarks that depend heavily on disk I/O (encoding, unzipping, launching apps, etc.) were inherently unfair. Compiling, however is much less dependent on disk I/O, given enough RAM and multithreaded makes.

      I was truly optimistic about the C3 chip, but it's let me down time and again, consistently underwhelming me. I'd much rather run a Pentium-M or Sempron on a Mini-ITX board than a C3. Ideally, there'd be decent PowerPC motherboards on the market, because that platform rocks when you're confined to low-power and heat situations, but alas, there aren't any reasonably priced PowerPC Mini-ITX boards around.

      As for RAM and OS X, I work with OS X all day and can say that the system comes into it's own at about 512MB and gets better the more you feed it. It'll work reasonably well with 256MB, but once you taste 512MB or 1GB, you can't turn back.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    118. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit man $300 for a gig of pc 2100? WTF is that? I just bought 1 gig of pc3200 for $150...

    119. Re:this goes against.... by Squozen · · Score: 1

      You're saying a > 1Ghz machine with 512Mb of RAM can't do basic family tasks like surfing the net, doing basic wordprocessing/spreadsheets and email?

      If so, you're wrong. The Mac mini is more than powerful enough for the average user (although not with 256Mb RAM, which I think is a mistake).

    120. Re:this goes against.... by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Dang, I just built a Dual Athlon MP system, with 1GB of RAM, two 2600+ processors, a 10000 RPM drive, 5900 video card, wireless networking (Or you can use the gigabit ethernet plug, and a dual layer DVD/CD burner for 85)$. I suppose you could downgrade that burner to the combo drive to reach your price point.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    121. Re:this goes against.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One of the most banal posts possible. It's a tautology saying, "I think this, so it is." Then it screeches at the parent to STFU. Result: modded "informative."

      LOL! More proof that the moderation on the Apple threads is light in the loafers. ;-)

    122. Re:this goes against.... by sydsavage · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's true that not all Macs can run linux. It's also true that not everything works completely in some distributions on a Mac. Yellow Dog is the most popular PPC distribution that is made specifically for running on a Mac. Looking at their support pages, it seems there are issues with ALSA sound. They don't yet have support documentation that describes the Mini, but the nearest relative would have to be the G4 iBook. Here is what they have to say about running YDL on it.

      SuSE also has a PPC distribution, but I get the impression it is geared more towards IBM's PPC based servers. At any rate, here is some information from them on the subject of Mac support. There are still other PPC distros that you can investigate the compatibility issues on your own.

      Depending on what you'd like to do with linux, running it on a Mini may or may not be right for you. If you just want to tinker, and familiarize yourself with the platform, I'd say go for it. Because you've got one hell of an OS installed along side it with OS X. If you plan to try to get lots of different devices to work under linux on PPC, you're probably better off with x86 hardware.

      To sum up, do your homework before you open your wallet. Ask yourself honestly what the purpose of running linux is, and what trade offs you might be willing to make if necessary. And finally, don't forget the OS X factor. You absolutely can't run that on the x86. And it's a really, really nice OS that can also give you an excellent unix experience, albeit a somewhat different experience than linux.

    123. Re:this goes against.... by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a big, ugly, poorly designed (well, the case anyway) Dell tower here on my desk at work...if someone wants to donate a Mac Mini to this cause we can finally get some real answers around here.

      --
      SPAM
    124. Re:this goes against.... by yurigoul · · Score: 1

      Are you sure this were not merely errors in the filesystem? Norton will fix this, it has to do with the vulnerabilty of the macos filesystem (dataforks/resource forks). But you need the norton boot cd to do it. This can be norton on a os9 boot cd or the original norton osx boot cd. Every os has its own limitations i guess.

    125. Re:this goes against.... by sgant · · Score: 1

      Well, Mr. Anonymous Coward, the guy wrote in his post that he didn't think it was a "killer system". I wrote back that I did think it was a "killer system".

      It's all perspective. One man's killer system is another persons toy.

      Also, in case you've never had moderation points, anyone anywhere with moderation points can moderate anywhere and everywhere...it's not like only Apple people get mod points to mod in Apple related stories.

      But anyway, getting back to your post...yes, I was saying exactly "I think this, so it is". Right on the money. Couldn't have said it better myself. I think that the Mac Mini with a Gig of RAM and DVD burner is a killer system, so it IS a killer system (now here it comes...wait for it....it's right here) FOR ME. A killer system FOR ME.

      So yes, STFU. It's called opinion. The guy isn't "right" to say it isn't a killer sytem any more than I was "right" in saying it was. (in case you're playing at home, you can also substitute the word "wrong" with "right" and get the same results).

      Also, someone that doesn't post with their real name in fear of mods shouldn't talk about banality.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    126. Re:this goes against.... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      What it boils down to is this: the specs aren't exactly impressive. Yes the Mac mini may have other strengths, but that doesn't change the numbers. It's not short-sighted to accurately note those numbers, either. As I pointed out above, they could reflect upon other deeper issues, like whether the user experience is good.


      What is the purpose of the Mini? Basically, it's meant as a low-cost computer that can be used for basic tasks (email, web-surfing etc.). And while doing all that, it's also small, silent and stylish. We CAN build something similar in the x86-world. For example (all prices are from mini-itx.com. I used European prices since that's where I'm in):

      VIA EPIA MII 12000 LVDS 1.2Ghz: 187e
      Hoojum Cubit 3 case: 172e
      512MB DDR-RAM: 85e
      Slotload CDRW/DVD: 85e
      40GB hard-drive: 50e

      Total-price: 579e. Note: this does NOT include the price of OS or other software.

      As to Mini:

      1.25Ghz Mini with 512MB RAM: 599e

      Both systems would be small (Mini is a bit smaller) and silent systems. Performance is good enough for everyday tasks (the Mini does have a lot more powerful CPU and vid-card, but the Via has faster HD). XP Pro would add 143e to the price of the Via-solution, but you could always get more generic case, which would reduce the price a bit. But in the end, the two would be about as cheap (if you include the price of the software). Although the Mini is a complete package, whereas you have to assemble the Via yourself.

      You could always get a Shuttle SFF or the like. But they would be considerable bigger (too big for my deks for example) and noisier. They would be more like regural computers, instead of appliances (like the Mini).

      Of course, the Mini is not for everyone.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    127. Re:this goes against.... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure. When he eventually reproduced the problem in front of me, I noticed it was accompanied by a clunk from the hard drive. I was alarmed, but let it go for a few days. The hung up times got longer, and were accompanied by an occasional failure to boot at all. It eventually got bad enough that we thought the drive was completely dead. Thankfully, it still came up from time to time, and the dealer was able to get the old data off eventually. (Why a dealer? Well, just because it's a CRT iMac, and I'm afraida CRTs.)

      By the way, resource forks (and, indeed, other forks) are not inherently unstable in Mac OS. They're a core part of the file system and quite stable. :)

    128. Re:this goes against.... by Y2 · · Score: 1
      For 700 bucks I get a DVD burner, 80 Gig HD and the best OS on the planet.

      Apple is shipping GEMSOS now?!?

      --
      "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
    129. Re:this goes against.... by flashinglights · · Score: 1

      And finally, don't forget the OS X factor. You absolutely can't run that on the x86.

      Aha! PearPC is a PowerPC emulator for the x86 which emulates a G3. Absolutely runs Mac OS X 10.3, Mandrake and Darwin, more or less. BSDs crash while booting due to a PCI hack (says the linked page).

      --
      "I had another dream the other day about music critics. They were small and rodent-like with padlocked ears..."
    130. Re:this goes against.... by DoctorRad · · Score: 1

      Morex 3677 mini-ITX case Silver

      The words butt and ugly leap to mind, would anyone seriously consider that monstrosity over a Mac mini?

      note that the Mac mini has a slightly faster CPU (and i'm willing to bet the G4 will out-perform the Via Eden in most cases).

      You could say that, considering the VIA CPU doesn't have so much as a floating point unit IIRC.

      Matt....

  2. Hmm by WillerZ · · Score: 1

    Still probably cheaper to buy your extra RAM from crucial...

    --
    I guess today is a passable day to die.
    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Bullshit it voids your warranty, unless your upgrade caused the problem. Remember to use Mac approved memory and things will be okay. Use a putty knife to open the case, it isn't that hard.

      I'd rather get a 512MB DIMM for the extra $75 initially however. That's because it is basically a requirement for the system.

    2. Re:Hmm by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you check out this forum thread you can see that
      http://www.macworld.com/forums/ubbthreads/printthr ead.php?Cat=&Board=UBB37&main=290448&type=thread

      Crucial already offers a 1 GB Ram upgrade for $227. Much cheaper than the Apple upgrade and you can put it in yourself.

    3. Re:Hmm by mattgarnsey · · Score: 1

      from apple:

      5. Memory, AirPort Extreme and internal Bluetooth upgrades must be performed by an Apple Authorized Service provider; fees may apply.

      cheaper, yes, but i imagine to do otherwise will add the cost of having your warranty voided.

    4. Re:Hmm by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 1

      Crucial: USD$226.99
      Apple: USD$329


      So yes. It still is...however, there's also this. Apparently this is 'ECC' RAM instead of 'non-ECC' like the $226, and it's also 'Registered' instead of 'Unbuffered,' and '128meg x 72' instead of '128 meg x 64'.

      Anybody care to explain the difference? It seems Apple's markup of $29 is reasonable considering they install it, if indeed this stick is what you'd get over the $329 one and those extra stuff make it better.

    5. Re:Hmm by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 1

      And how long do you expect to keep a $500 machine? For that price even computers are easily disposable.

      You always have the option of buying the crucial ram and having an apple authorized guy install it. However I don't know how much the installation alone would cost.

    6. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the video where some guy opens up a Mac Mini? The text along it says "you will hear cracking sounds but that is to be expected." I personally wouldn't want to open it up.

    7. Re:Hmm by mgs1000 · · Score: 1
      And how long do you expect to keep a $500 machine? For that price even computers are easily disposable.

      And it won't take up a lot of room in the back of your closet!

    8. Re:Hmm by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      -ECC is "error correction code" aka parity.
      -Registered/buffered makes for slightly slower RAM (though at pc2700, you could use higher-end circuitry) by storing memory fetches in latched registers/buffers to ensure that no timing weirdness occurrs (ie, reading a byte when only 4 of the bits have been set)
      -the extra bits (72 vs 64) are used for the parity bits for ECC.

      So to recap, what apple is installing is "better" in terms of stability, and if they use faster-rated RAM (say, PC3000) to build it, the speed lost to ECC and buffering will be negligible compared to normal PC2700. Theres a good chance they used normal PC2700 with buffering and ecc, which would make it slower than PC2700 without.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    9. Re:Hmm by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Not if you are only upgrading to 512MB and are too lazy to resell (and have no other use for) the 256MB DIMM it comes with. If you are upgrading to 1GB, then it is still probably cheaper (although if you need 1GB of RAM then the Mini may well not be the right machine for you).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Hmm by af_robot · · Score: 1

      ECC/registred memory modules are primary for servers. Also it is usually slower that normal memory.

    11. Re:Hmm by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Er, not quite. ECC is indeed Error Correction Code. However, parity is an error detection code - it can't correct.

    12. Re:Hmm by AddressException · · Score: 1

      If you can open the case (using the putty knife method) you can install the networking gear yourself!

    13. Re:Hmm by af_robot · · Score: 1

      "So to recap, what apple is installing is "better" in terms of stability, and if they use faster-rated RAM (say, PC3000) to build it, the speed lost to ECC and buffering will be negligible compared to normal PC2700. Theres a good chance they used normal PC2700 with buffering and ecc, which would make it slower than PC2700 without."

      I don't think that Appple use ECC or registred memory modules in MacMini. I also sure that a even a faster rated module will still run at a speed of PC2700, not at its rating speed (PC3200), so it is not true that a faster module is always better. So buying ECC/registred module is just wasting your money - your memory speed will be slower that a normal RAM and it costs more. ECC is good for servers, not for home PCs.

    14. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you can install the networking gear yourself!

      You haven't thought that through. Where are you going to buy, for example, the BT adapter? Apple only sales that as parts to Authorized Repair Centers. Their dealers aren't even allowed to buy them! Unless there's some sort of Apple parts blackmarket that I don't know about, you are forced to deal with Apple on parts.

    15. Re:Hmm by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      ... i imagine to do otherwise will add the cost of having your warranty voided.
      I highly doubt it since Apple would be in violation of federal law.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    16. Re:Hmm by Nerftoe · · Score: 1

      Crucial? What are you, simple? Crucial comes up with their prices by taking the lowest price on pricewatch and doubling it. They feel they can charge that much for their "drop down" wizards. ;-)

    17. Re:Hmm by bonch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple says the warranty is only void if you damage any parts of the mini in the upgrade process. It would be illegal for them to void your warranty just because you upgraded your system. Think of installing a new oil filter in a car.

    18. Re:Hmm by damieng · · Score: 1

      Surely such a law should also give users a right to purchase ink cartridges from other manufacturers?

      --
      [)amien
    19. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Apple says the warranty is only void if you damage any parts of the mini in the upgrade process. It would be illegal for them to void your warranty just because you upgraded your system. Think of installing a new oil filter in a car."

      You must not own a Volkswagon. The Volkswagon dealership informed me not to install K&N air filters or oil filters on my Turbo Beetle or it would void their warranty (something about the particles from the lubed air filter). And this is in *liberal* *anti-business* California.

    20. Re:Hmm by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      I had to use Registered DDR RAM in my last PC (a Tyan Tiger MP), because I had all four slots filled. It's more expensive, and has 1-memory-bus-cycle higher latency than unbuffered RAM. On modern systems, if your processor has to load from memory you've already lost a lot of time, and making it 1-cycle worse doesn't make a lot of difference. It won't affect prefetching code either, unless it's been specifically tuned for unbuffered RAM (and unless it's a custom app, this won't have happened). I don't think ECC hurts performance as the circuitry for that is quite small and built in to your memory bus controller already.

      Don't buy registered unless you need it (your mobo manual will tell you) because it's expensive. Don't buy ECC unless you want the reliability and you're sure your system supports it as it's also more expensive.

      The performance considerations shouldn't sway your decision, as on all modern systems they're essentially irrelevant.

      Phil

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    21. Re:Hmm by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Are you serious or is this a joke?

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    22. Re:Hmm by Horse+Rotorvator+JAD · · Score: 1

      And how long do you expect to keep a $500 machine? For that price even computers are easily disposable.

      Shit. It better last me at least a decade. $500.00 may not be a lot to you but it is for many of us. I have an old Toshiba laptop that I bought around ~1994 and I still use it. It is currently running FreeDOS. The battery is long dead but I keep it plugged into the wall next to my bed. If I cannot sleep I grab it and start up vi.exe to read all the old text files that I have saved on its 81MB hard drive.

      For some reason those Mac Minis don't look like they will last a decade of hard use. I could be wrong though.

    23. Re:Hmm by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      Maybe. IANAL, but I believe the law I cited only had to do with voiding one's warranty. Purchasing a 3rd-party ink cartridge for some printers, AFAIK, simply won't work, but trying to use it doesn't void your warranty.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    24. Re:Hmm by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      The dealer can say all they want (even here in California), but it doesn't matter unless they can show that your filter was directly responsible for any damage to your car.

      See the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act (15 USC 2301-2312). Good stuff to be aware of, especially when dealing with cars. It applies to other consumer items as well, though.

      People really need to stop going to vendors for information on what is and is not allowed with their products. Just because a car dealer says you can't change a filter or a software vendor prints something in an EULA doesn't make it so, no matter how much they scream and wave their arms.

    25. Re:Hmm by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      I have found apple to be very generous when taking in repairs under warranty. My boss dropped my powerbook down three flights of stairs. Clearly this is abuse, and wouldn't be covered under the warranty. I called them, they sent the box, and I received it a week later in brand new condition. My boss had a motherboard fail way after the warranty expired, again, they replaced it for free, even though the warranty was expired. It's probably just my experience, but it seems that Apple tries really hard to keep their customers pleased with their purchases.

    26. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a $500 computer and as you say, the warranty is only one year. Only the motherboard is non-standard. Even if you saved just $100 on the memory and later the hard drive broke and you had to replace it yourself, you'd still be better off (perhaps getting a faster disk in the process).

    27. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No joke. You can get RAM of the same caliber as the apple installed memory for even 1/3 of what Crucial quotes. As far as Crucial coming up with their prices by looking at pricwatch and doubling, I think that was a joke.

    28. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are unfortunate circumstances that can lead to poverty, but to most first-world citizens $500 is not a lot of money. You're obviously a smart person who is probably capable of holding a well-paying job; I'm not inclined to believe that you are too poor to only afford a computer every 10 years out of necessity. If it is out of necessity, though, I'm sorry to hear that.

    29. Re:Hmm by aBlooMoon · · Score: 1

      Apple has stated that your warranty is good unless you break something.

      --
      http://kansieo.com
    30. Re:Hmm by RodgerDodger · · Score: 1

      It is, of course, your responsibility to prove that the upgrade didn't damage the mini... But that's the same for any other warranty.

      Some people have been talking about lifetime RAM warranties. Bought some defective RAM that didn't work when you installed it? Want to return it? Gee, I hope you can prove you used an anti-static wrist strap when you installed it, otherwise the manufacturer can say it was your fault. (A reseller probably won't say this, BTW)

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
  3. Or they were losing to cheaper players by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or perhaps they were losing upgrade sales to cheaper players in the market? I have always been very annoyed at $200 upgrades from anyone, where a generic alternative is $12.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Or they were losing to cheaper players by jfengel · · Score: 1

      That matches my experience. The RAM price struck me as particularly egregious: $400+ for something I can get elsewhere for $200. I was going to get a mac mini and then upgrade the RAM myself. I may still do that, but for a mere $100 premium vs. not having to open the case, I'd consider taking theirs. (I'm a programmer, not a hardware weenie, and I'm always a little paranoid to be in there mucking around with expensive and fragile components that I don't really understand.)

    2. Re:Or they were losing to cheaper players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up and get back to the GNAA's veiny cocks, you bitch !

  4. From what I've heard... by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 1

    ...if your Mini hasn't shipped yet, they give you the new Superdrive. It'd be awesome if it was true for the early adopters, I guess...this is one reason why I always wait a bit to buy one, but that's just me.

    1. Re:From what I've heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be cool, but I just checked the online Apple Store (for the U.S.), and the menu item for customizing the Mini specifically listed a 4x SuperDrive, not the 8x model...

    2. Re:From what I've heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They said they ALL shipped with the 8X drive, they just didn't have the right specs on the web page.

  5. It's about friggin' time... by doctechniqal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Amazing - Apple seems to have finally realized that when you market something high quality and feature rich at low cost, people will flock to your stores. There may be hope yet for mass market acceptance of the Mac platform.

    The Mac Mini - Greatly Insane!

    A question: can a Mac mouse/keyboard from an old G3 system be used with the Mini?

    1. Re:It's about friggin' time... by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1
      Amazing - Apple seems to have finally realized that when you market something high quality and feature rich at low cost, people will flock to your stores

      Um...or very HIGH price. Ever heard of this little thing they sell called the iPod?

    2. Re:It's about friggin' time... by iJames · · Score: 2, Informative
      A question: can a Mac mouse/keyboard from an old G3 system be used with the Mini?

      Any USB mouse or keyboard will work.

    3. Re:It's about friggin' time... by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

      A USB Keyboard/mouse will work (Such as the ones that came with the Blue&WHite G3).

      The beige G3's used ADB (Apple Desktop Bus), so they will *not* work on the Mini, which only supports USB.

    4. Re:It's about friggin' time... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      A question: can a Mac mouse/keyboard from an old G3 system be used with the Mini?

      Why do people ask questions like this on Slashdot? Google works pretty well. If it is USB it will work fine. If it is older, you will need an ADB-USB adapter, which is probably about as expensive as just buying a new keyboard and mouse.

    5. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ADB keyboards and mice will work with a Mini if you buy a Griffin iMate. I still use an old ADB keyboard (circa 1995) with my Dual G5 tower because you can't beat the tactile feel of classic Apple keyboards.

      Until about a year and a half ago, I was using an ADB mouse that had seen so much use that there was a thumb divot worn into the plastic side. Now I use a Logitech Mx500 - it's well-built and the button placement is perfect. I use 6 of the 8 buttons regularly and can't live without them.

    6. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A question: can a Mac mouse/keyboard from an old G3 system be used with the Mini?

      Check this out

    7. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heard of it? Yes.

      Ever seen someone using one? No.

      Guess that indicates the actual amount of people buying iPods.

    8. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they realized that sales were not meeting expectations and they lowered the price of additions to create a spark.

    9. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you need to buy the special Apple keyboard+mouse combo - now at the exceptional low price of $499 + tax (one time offer; processing fees may apply)

      What, are you some sort of moron? oh, wait, it's a Mac user - Google is too technical for you.

    10. Re:It's about friggin' time... by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      A question: can a Mac mouse/keyboard from an old G3 system be used with the Mini?

      If your old G3 is beige, then you have ADB. You will need an USB-ADB adapter, such as this one. If your system is the Blue & White tower, then you already have USB, you will not need any kind of adapter.

      For everyone else in the PC world, virtually every USB keyboard and mouse will work out of the box. Right-clicking brings up contextual menus as you would expect, and the scroll wheel scrolls pages, etc. If you have a PS/2 mouse/keyboard, then you will need an adapter to USB like this one.

    11. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the fuck do you live, Siberia?

    12. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Null537 · · Score: 1

      Ever seen someone using one? No.

      Guess that indicates the actual amount of people buying iPods.


      That's like living in Nebraska and saying you don't see any snow shovels around.

    13. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You're going to want something like this ADB->USB adapter which lists for $39. For that price, you can probably buy a decent USB keyboard and mouse.

      Froogle for lower prices on the iMate.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    14. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For everyone else in the PC world, virtually every USB keyboard and mouse will work out of the box.

      They will work, but not every keyboard will work well. For those that don't have a Mac keyboard with "Command" and "Option" keys, add Apple's $29 keyboard onto the Mac mini order. Don't bother with the Apple mouse.

    15. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I only see five or six different people a day. I guess that DOES indicate the amount of people buying iPods.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    16. Re:It's about friggin' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't bother with the Apple mouse."

      Unless the machine is for someone inexperienced with computers, then it is a Godsend!

  6. critical dyslexia? by enlcd · · Score: 0, Redundant

    the price of an upgrade from a 40 GB hard drive to an 80 GB hard drive has been reduced to $50 from $90

    1. Re:critical dyslexia? by Tx · · Score: 0

      Yes, you have got dyslexia. Read it again, slower this time.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re:critical dyslexia? by bwcarty · · Score: 1

      Reads fine to me.

      from a 40 GB hard drive to an 80 GB hard drive
      Standard Drive: 40GB
      Upgraded Drive: 80GB

      the price... has been reduced to $50 from $90

      Old upgrade price: $90
      New upgrade price: $50

  7. Total by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what's the total for a tricked out mini?

    fp

    1. Re:Total by amichalo · · Score: 4, Funny

      So what's the total for a tricked out mini?

      I was able to configure one up to a surprising $40,553!

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  8. holy shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    i do not care about this nerd shit
    back to lifting weights while my girlfriend reads this article for me

  9. What about by turtled · · Score: 0

    What about Digital Audio upgrades? I want this to be a true media center; i keep leaning towards this little guy...

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
    1. Re:What about by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      I suppose the main reason they left it out, was that it can be easily added with a bluetooth dongle if wanted, otherwise they can't justify the extra expense.

  10. Look.... by sethadam1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look, everyone's going to be excited about this, but let's just say this and get it out of the way:

    All this did was correct stuff that was already WAY overpriced to begin with. I'm thrilled, and this pretty much seals up that I'll buy a mini, but I don't think it makes a huge difference to most people, maybe just to those on the fence. If they weren't going to buy one before, they probably won't now just because of these incremental price "normalizations."

    1. Re:Look.... by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All this did was correct stuff that was already WAY overpriced to begin with. I'm thrilled, and this pretty much seals up that I'll buy a mini, but I don't think it makes a huge difference to most people, maybe just to those on the fence. If they weren't going to buy one before, they probably won't now just because of these incremental price "normalizations."

      I have always said "the day a Mac becomes affordable I will own one." The mini brought that to be and mine is on its way (should be here the 27th).

      I am getting the 1.42Ghz with 80GB HD. It'll have the bare minimum 256MB of RAM and the regular combo drive but if push comes to shove I'll get an external Firewire DVD writer and might even open the case myself and add some RAM. Who knows. It'll all depend on how well it performs for me.

      I always wait too long and am left in the dust by the early adopters. Now with this price drop I got burnt by being one :( I can never win :)

    2. Re:Look.... by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      I'll have to re-evaluate the mini's prices based on these changes, but unfortunately it doesn't compete favourably in the Canadian market place given the exchange rate. The 'base' mini was selling for $629 CAD ($749 for the decent model), and with the overpriced upgrades it was close to $1000. For $1000 in the Canadian marketplace I could buy a really solid Athlon 64 system w/ more memory, disk, and a better video card. The other 'gotcha' for migration is that apparently the non-standard keyboard & mouse subjects your to Apple markups. The $ exchange doesn't seem to hurt as much on generic PC components, especially in major urban centres (Vancouver, Toronto).

      I'm really keen on this model and it looks like a great migration strategy, but its still in tough competition for the price point.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    3. Re:Look.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      256MB of RAM is inadequate for anything OS X related. I wouldn't fly with less than 512 myself, and any new machine of mine will have 1GB atleast, but that's mostly because I like World of Warcraft and working on RAW pictures from my D70.

    4. Re:Look.... by amichalo · · Score: 1

      I'm thrilled, and this pretty much seals up that I'll buy a mini, but I don't think it makes a huge difference to most people, maybe just to those on the fence.

      You just said it "seals up" that you will buy a mini, and in the next sentence, you sais it won't make a difference to most people. It obviously is making a difference to you. It sealed the deal.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    5. Re:Look.... by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      The other 'gotcha' for migration is that apparently the non-standard keyboard & mouse subjects your to Apple markups.

      Not really. Keyboards I've bought recently have all been USB and PS2 compatable.

      However, I think the choice to not include PS2 sockets for KB and mouse was probably a mistake, since it makes it one step harder for someone with minumal technical knowledge (which is, after all, their core target market) to share a KB and monitor with a cheap KVM switch they could pick up on the highstreet.

      I can see a lot of people wanting to add a Mac to the household, without wanting extra desk space, but needing to retain a windows PC -- for instance for the kid playing games.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    6. Re:Look.... by MagerValp · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am getting the 1.42Ghz with 80GB HD. It'll have the bare minimum 256MB of RAM and the regular combo drive but if push comes to shove I'll get an external Firewire DVD writer and might even open the case myself and add some RAM. Who knows. It'll all depend on how well it performs for me.

      Unless you're planning on running one application at a time, you will want to get at least 512 MB. MacOS X is slow as molasses with 256 MB, and it's a shame that Apple still sells computers with that little memory. As Anandtech points out the machine swaps quite a bit with 256 MB, and the 2.5" HD is rather slow.

      --

      READY.
      #
    7. Re:Look.... by Drakonian · · Score: 1
      As someone else mentioned, you definitely want 512 MB of RAM. OS X is a dog without it.

      As for being burnt, call up Apple. They'll credit you the difference.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    8. Re:Look.... by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      In some ways I see the X-Box and PS/2 (3?) eventually strengthening the possibility of a Mac in the home. I stick with a Wintel box for a few reasons, primarily though for backwards compatability between upgrades and for games.

      File formats are fairly generic now, especially in the multimedia (e.g. digital video/pics) space. Games are still Mac's weak point ... but if consoles get to the point of being the defacto platform, it eliminates a reason for a PC. I'd rather have a utility Mac for personal productivity than a mini ITX case.

      if they can get RTSes, decent FPSers, and some turn based strategy (Europa Universalis! Civilisation!) onto the consoles in a serious way, it may be the best thing ever to happen to Apple.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    9. Re:Look.... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Depending on when it shipped, you still may be able to get the price discount. Check out this comment:
      http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1 37358&cid= 11480807

      Maybe you'll get lucky.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    10. Re:Look.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just said it "seals up" that you will buy a mini, and in the next sentence, you sais it won't make a difference to most people. It obviously is making a difference to you. It sealed the deal.

      He also said "most people". Obviously he doesn't consider himself a part of "most people". Man you're stupid. Why don't you Apple haters just stay out of Apple stories. Dork.

    11. Re:Look.... by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      The problem with consoles as game platforms is that they have to be priced down where people will buy them.

      To play games on a Windows box I just have to pay a small premium over what I was paying to get a web-email-Word platform to get a slightly better graphics card. To play games on a console I have to buy a complete stand-alone box. That means for the same outlay I get far more game-specific hardware by going the PC route, assuming I was going to have a computer anyway.

      I just bought a not too exciting mid-range graphics card for my windows box. It cost me more than an xbox or PS-2 would cost me now, but less than what they cost when they were launched. So, more or less the same money, but it has all gone on the graphics hardware where it will make a difference to the game experience, not on the power supply, memory, cpu, case, ...

      The effect of this squeeze on console hardware can be seen when you play a game designed for consoles and ported to the PC. Most painfully recently Deus-Ex Invisible War with those teeny-tiny little levels and interface clearly designed for a thumb pad (and plot designed for 12 year olds, but that is a slightly diffent type of consolitis).

      Of course, the same arguments hold for audio kit, and that didn't stop midi systems and such from eventually taking off as a way of spending more and getting less.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    12. Re:Look.... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you much better off just buying the minimal memory, then going to 1 gig by purchasing and installing it yourself?

      Maybe I need to recheck pricing now that they've dropped things, but the other day while putting together my dream "Mini" throwing every option into the mix, I found that their pricing for ram at any configuration was just plain ridiculous.

      It seems to me you'd save a considerable amount of cash just installing the ram yourself.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    13. Re:Look.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if this is still true, but AFAIK iDVD works only with installed DVD drives. You may want to re-think that purchase.

    14. Re:Look.... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Informative

      And according to Anand's article, buying a 512mb stick is actually cheaper through Apple... though you don't get to keep the 256mb stick afterwards... If you sold the 256mb stick, then yes, it's cheaper to buy your own.

    15. Re:Look.... by frankie · · Score: 1
      I could buy a really solid Athlon 64 system w/ more memory, disk, and a better video card.

      ...which will weigh 30 pounds, sound like a vacuum cleaner, and have a lesser warranty. But if those are not factors for you, then yes, you can get a more price-efficient x86 box.

    16. Re:Look.... by garcia · · Score: 1

      You just use Patchburn. I read up on that before making my descision :)

    17. Re:Look.... by Angostura · · Score: 1

      I think slow as molasses is overdoing it. My wife has a G3 iBook with 256Mb, it works just fine. I wouldn't call it snappy. But I wouldn't call it molasses.

      If course, she doesn't run Photoshop or anything.

    18. Re:Look.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't they stop posting all these Apple© Slashvertisements(TM) on the first page, and you Apple lovers keep your jerk off sessions out of non-Apple stories? And that includes the stories about other, non-Apple, mp3 players.

      Wow, Apple cuts prices and add options after ass fucking their early adapting victims! Now that is news, just like the other fifty stories devoted to masturbating over Apple's new crappy computer.

    19. Re:Look.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      256MB of RAM is inadequate for anything OS X related.

      You are mistaken. Have you ever even used OSX? It runs on 128 MB of PC100 RAM with no hiccups. A bit slow, but stable. 256 MB isn't great but it's certainly "adequate".

    20. Re:Look.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you call waiting 5-10 seconds to switch from Safari to any other application "adequate", then I guess it is. I typically have 4 or 5 Safari windows open, and maybe 20-25 tabs among them. When I'm researching a specific topic, that may double. But routinely I check on Safari and it's usually using 600-1000 MB of virtual memory. WTF?? I have the same number of windows/tabs open on Mozilla for IRIX right now and it's using 37 MB. For Safari, that's some serious bloat in a browser that was supposed to be "fast and light."

      My 1.25 GHz PowerBook had 256 MB of memory for a few weeks while I waited for replacements for some bad 3rd party RAM. It was horrible. I preferred using the Win2k machine over the PowerBook, even though it made me feel icky. At least it was responsive. Now that I have a full gig back in the PowerBook, the PC stays off.

      But seriously, 256 MB for OS X is laughable. Runs, sure. Runs quite well as long as anything resembling speed isn't one of your criteria. And with a 4200 rpm drive like the mini and my PowerBook have, swapping is horrendous. Go take a break when that thing starts to swap, 'cause it's gonna be awhile. I don't give a shit how many frames per second my computer can do in this or that application, as long as it keeps up with ME. With a proper amount of memory, even my 600 MHz G3 iBook is plenty fast. Without enough, I imagine even a dual 2.0 G5 would suck ass.

      I'm a big fan of Apple, love most of their products, and hope they do well. But I think it would be seriously funny if the Mac mini bombed after the initial sales rush once people saw how damn slow the thing is with only 256 MB of memory. It's criminal of Apple not to include 512 MB standard in all of their machines, when they know very well that their core market consists of people who will never upgrade their machines - they just want something that "works". I just hope they have the patience to wait.

    21. Re:Look.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not still true. Since iLife '04, ou can edit an iDVD project on any machine, regardless of the drive. Of course you can still only burn on a machine with an Apple SuperDrive (or OEM equivalent).

    22. Re:Look.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People with "minumal" [sic] technical knowledge will not want to use a KVM switch, much less know what one is. The Mac mini is supposed to replace your PC. Pull the cables out of the PC, plug them into the Mac, boom. You're done.

    23. Re:Look.... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why don't they stop posting all these Apple© Slashvertisements(TM) on the first page, and you Apple lovers keep your jerk off sessions out of non-Apple stories? And that includes the stories about other, non-Apple, mp3 players.

      If you don't like spooge in your eye, stay the hell out of bukkake.slashdot.org.

      If you use a registered account, you can filter out the bukkake stories. If you insist on browsing without an account, bring plenty of paper towels.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    24. Re:Look.... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      MacOS X is slow as molasses with 256 MB, and it's a shame that Apple still sells computers with that little memory.

      What really blows my mind that is that the amount of memory that all the iMacs (even the 20" model at $1900) and the PowerMacs upto and including the dual 1.8Ghz model is only 256MB. All but the cheapest, crappiest new PCs come with 512MB nowadays. Apple really needs to get with the program.

    25. Re:Look.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't fuck anyone over, but you could care less because you're raging against the machine! woo! rage on man.

    26. Re:Look.... by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      People with "minumal" [sic] technical knowledge will not want to use a KVM switch, much less know what one is.

      No one wants to use a KVM switch, it's not as if it's entertaining. People want to save a square yard of flat surface.

      Pull the cables out of the PC, plug them into the Mac, boom. You're done.

      Unless you actually used the Windows machine for anything non trivial, in which case there will be a non trivial period for which you will need to swap back and forth, until you have all your data and replacements for all you applications up and going on the Mac. Switching between platforms is a non-trivial project, cables are the trivial part.

      If I had been designing a windows replacement Mac I'd have built in a KVM switch. Plug the mac between the windoze machine and the screen, keyboard and mouse and bang, there you go. Eventually retire the windows machine.

      Mind you, I'd have given it a voice modem too to provide one more killer app at more or less zero cost, so what would I know.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
  11. what about those that bought earlier? by supersuckers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone know what happens to people that paid the previously higher price? I recall something like this happening to the powerbook? I could be wrong, but I think mac reimbursed in some way.

    1. Re:what about those that bought earlier? by Folmer · · Score: 1

      If you havent had it shipped yet (i dont think that that many people have it yet), the order has been changed to reflect the price changes.
      I belive that apple is working on something for the people who have recieved it already, as they have done for people who had bought fx. their laptops a week before some major upgrade.

    2. Re:what about those that bought earlier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I received an e-mail last night from Apple stating that my price had bee updated to reflect recent price drops:

      To Our Valued Apple Customer:

      Thank you for your recent order.

      We are writing to inform you that your order has been changed to reflect our
      new, lower pricing!

      Please visit the Apple Store online at to see the
      latest pricing information for this product and many others!

      Thank you for shopping at the Apple Store.

      Apple Store Customer Support

      That's awsome - there aren't too many companies that would do this for customers who had already purchased at the prior, higher price

    3. Re:what about those that bought earlier? by thecombatwombat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple has a policy about this, it's in one of the emails you'll receive after buying anything from the store. If the price falls within 10 days of shipping, they'll refund you the difference.

    4. Re:what about those that bought earlier? by tdemark · · Score: 1

      What I think is in effect:

      All orders that shipped in the 10 days prior to the announced price drop are eligible for reimbursement based on the lower rates. Owners have 14 days from the announcement to contact Apple to have their refunds processed.

      Since I don't think any mini's were shipped before the 15th (please correct me on that if I am mistaken), all minis should be eligible.

      - Tony

  12. UK pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Question is, will they introduce these price drops internationally as well (or just "tweak" them and we'll be stitched up with Apple's interpretation of the currency exchange rates).

    1. Re:UK pricing by Folmer · · Score: 1

      I looked at the danish store today, and the prices have dropped. I'm not sure about the exchange rates, but its cheaper than yesterday.

    2. Re:UK pricing by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The prices in the UK store this morning were cheaper than they were yesterday.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:UK pricing by nickovs · · Score: 1

      At this time they seem to have messed up the UK pricing completely. While the disc upgrade price looks fine at £30 the WiFI+Bluetooth package has gone up to £152.88 (despite the individual modules remaining unchanged at £49 and £35 respectively) and the price of the 1GB upgrade has risen to a staggering £561.53. These compared to $99 for wireless and $325 for the RAM. Curiously, if you take £99, subtract the VAT and convert to dollars you end up close to $153 and if you take £325, subtract the VAT you end up 10% under $561. I wonder if someone at Apple UK typed the numbers into the wrong side of some currency converter...

      --
      If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
    4. Re:UK pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      don't forget to add import duty after the VAT which is another 10% of the total inc vat price

      but i agree its another rip-off-britain pricing scheme, still Apple are getting beaten down this year so perhaps after a few big fines they will re-evaluate their pricing policies

      that is if they are still around after Apple Corps have finished with them

    5. Re:UK pricing by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      Apple's UK store had a glitch earlier today with wildly inflated BTO component prices.

      Just checked the price for what I intend to order on Friday (payday!)

      1.42GHz Mini
      512MB RAM
      Superdrive
      Bluetooth + Airport

      Was £603 including VAT. Now £589 including VAT. Free shipping on both.

      So I'm happy, at least :)

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
  13. I've heard that Apple will refund the difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to people that already ordered at the higher price.

    Can anyone confirm?

    Also I now await stories about Dell, HP, Alienware, et al, whenever they drop their optional extra prices.

  14. Now how about accessory purchases? by digitalgimpus · · Score: 0

    That's great, but that's about BTO (Built to order)

    How about the ability to purchase parts such as:

    - WiFi Card
    - Bigger HD
    - Keyboard
    - Mouse

    At a lower cost?

    I can get the WiFi card BTO cheaper, but I still can't but it on my own and add it in later. I need to choose now, or use a third party.

    IMHO Apple would win some more "do it yourself" people if they offered upgrades and parts.

    I'm still suprised they didn't create an "accessory bundle"

    Buy Keyboard, Mouse, and Display, and get X dollars off your purchase. Considering it's a headless computer, they could have made some good cash by making the consumer inclined to purchase all that from Apple, rather than get a cheap logitech Keyboard/Mouse set, and a Dell Display.

    1. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by jxyama · · Score: 2, Insightful
      cheapest display apple offers is $999 20". no matter the discount, i doubt there'll be much demand to pay almost twice as much for the display as for the computer.

      if someone wanted a bundle including a mouse/kb/monitor, there's a perfectly good (and more powerful) alternative called iMac. (and it's not much more expensive that buying a mini with all the accessories from apple, as you suggested.)

    2. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by Adelvillar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple carefully selects the components and controls the drivers that are supported on their OS. That is why they don't encourage DIY configurations.

      The key for Apple is a smooth experience with their Hardware/OS integration. If at the $499 entry price point you are still complaining the odds are you are never going to buy a Mac. So understandably they won't really care much about options and favor overall user experience.

      --
      "In God we trust, all others must bring data" - W. Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Dunno about that. Monitors usually have a useful life much longer than the computer they are attached to. And, if you are like a lot of the /. crowd, you spend a LOT of time looking at it. Spend $$ on a good display - it will be a long term investment,and can really affect your eyes, etc.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    4. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by ChibiOne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IMHO Apple would win some more "do it yourself" people if they offered upgrades and parts. That's because the Mini is not intended for the "do it yourself" kind of people. We know YOU and the rest of the Slashdotters can build a beowlf cluster from scrap parts of a Commodore64 for less than $99.

    5. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by jxyama · · Score: 1
      i imagine a lot of /. crowd who'd consider purchasing the mini would already have a usb kb and a mouse, if not a good dvi monitor.

      i think apple is not completely insane for offering mini the way it is, it distinguishes itself well from other Mac products.

      if apple offered the mini with monitor/kb/mouse bundle, then /. crowd would blast apple for charging the same price for G4 mini with 20" monitor and G5 iMac 20". ;)

    6. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by iJames · · Score: 1
      Buy Keyboard, Mouse, and Display, and get X dollars off your purchase. Considering it's a headless computer, they could have made some good cash by making the consumer inclined to purchase all that from Apple, rather than get a cheap logitech Keyboard/Mouse set, and a Dell Display.

      I see your point, but I also see Apple's point. The people who want a KBM from them can buy an eMac. ($800, a great price.) Selling them for the Mini would only intrude into the eMac's turf. The eMac's gotten almost no publicity and is forgotten by everyone, but I wouldn't be surprised to see them push it harder in the near future as this "cost revolution" rolls on.

      The Mac Mini is not really positioned to be a first computer for anyone. It's positioned to replace the Windows computer you've gotten sick of, meaning you've got the keyboard and monitor already sitting around, or it's positioned to sit on top of your television and become a media box. For those two applications, selling an "official" Mac Mini display devices would only confuse the issue.

    7. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Apples sells it 102.11g card for 79.00 (just click AirPort & Wireless) & fore 39.95 you can add a BlueTooth dongle (yes its external but the internal one is sodered to the motherboard)

      If you buy a new computer you also get up-to a 99-dollar rebate if you also buy an epson c98 (or something like that) and you could buy that from the apple store or you local office supply store.

      Oh and Apple has also reduced the price of its bluetooth keyboard and mouse since MacWorld so that discounted already... but then you would whine apple only sells a one button mouse. You can't please all people, obvious they will never please you.

    8. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by EaterOfDog · · Score: 1

      "Monitors usually have a useful life much longer than the computer they are attached to." We are not talking about Dells and Gateways here. Most Apple computers last a long time. I have seen lots of perfectly functioning eMacs and iMacs trashed because the monitor was fuzzy or dim.

      --

      Crushing my karma one post at a time.
    9. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not soldered on. They offer a kit to add Airport Extreme and Bluetooth for people who bought mac minis without them. Unless they want their AppleTechs soldering them on to the logic boards. It's probably just a funky connector.

    10. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by siskbc · · Score: 1
      cheapest display apple offers is $999 20". no matter the discount, i doubt there'll be much demand to pay almost twice as much for the display as for the computer.

      Oddly enough, this thing works with non-Apple displays. Apple isn't interested in the low-end screen market, though their stuff is compatible.

      if someone wanted a bundle including a mouse/kb/monitor, there's a perfectly good (and more powerful) alternative called iMac. (and it's not much more expensive that buying a mini with all the accessories from apple, as you suggested.)

      Different market. Lots of people already have mouse, keyboard, and monitor laying around. Me, for example. Or other PC users, who are much of the target audience for this thing. Another target market is for use as something of a home entertainment center - so this thing could be hooked up to a TV, and no monitor. This thing would also look great with and fit in a component rack, which helps in that regard.

      The new iMac, meanwhile, is meant as a great one-piece desktop, and does quite well from everything I can tell. But the missions of the iMac, and the Mini, are quite different.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    11. Re:Now how about accessory purchases? by jxyama · · Score: 1

      did you even read the post i was replying to?

  15. I wonder by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 1

    I wonder how the early adopter who already bought the latest model for the premium price feel right now. Will Apple offer post-purchase discounts? I feel like the thing was launched 2 weeks ago... I sure would be pissed off if I bought something as soon as its out to see it drop 200$ (arbitrary figure) in price in two weeks....

    1. Re:I wonder by z-kungfu · · Score: 1

      They've already taken care of it... BTO are being upgraded...

    2. Re:I wonder by Cmdr+TECO · · Score: 2, Informative
      Will Apple offer post-purchase discounts?

      Probably -1 Redundant by now, but here:

      Should Apple reduce its price on any shipped product within 10 calendar days of shipment, you may contact Apple Sales Support at 1-800-676-2775 to request a refund or credit of the difference between the price you were charged and the current selling price.
      Orders that haven't shipped yet automatically get the current price.
      --
      echo 33676832766569823265328479713269.8639857989Pq | dc
  16. Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Cougem · · Score: 5, Informative

    Or perhaps they read Anandtechs's review saying it was positively scandelous to sell the unit with 256MB RAM with such expensive upgrades.

    Good review for those who care.

    1. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Too bad they didn't upgrade minimum RAM to 512MiB. That would be the best.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    2. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A reseller I was talking to said that he preferred that they only sold with 256MB of RAM, as he can sell people third party ram and installation and make a profit on that, whereas his profits from the Mac Mini are almost non-existant.

    3. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Xugumad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've said this before, but I have to disagree. I've worked with Macs with 256MB of RAM, and they were fine. I wouldn't want to run Photoshop with 256MB RAM, but I wouldn't want to run Photoshop on one of these anyway! Yes, 512MB is nice, but it's hardly a necessity.

      As to the people saying you need 1GB, what for? I've got a flatmate that does graphical work on a PowerMac with 512MB, and it's fine for everything except Photoshop. Everyone seems too used to Windows XP's memory usage, and is assuming OS X is similar...

    4. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Did you read the Anandtech review the original poster linked too? The reviewer clearly laid out the reasons why 512MB RAM was needed.

    5. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by va3atc · · Score: 1

      On that review they say it takes 85W!
      Man, my halogen lamp on low setting takes more then that thing.

      Turn off the monitor and it should make a good webserver off a UPS for quite some time.

      --
      Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    6. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I COMPLETELY disagree.

      When I bought my iBook, it came with 256 RAM. Everything about the notebook felt slow, and Warcraft III was barely playable.

      After upgrading the RAM to 512, everything just flew compared to before. I was very pleased with the performance boost, and the notebook actually felt speedy for once.

      As the Anandtech article mentions, the Mini Mac comes with an extremely slow HD like notebooks. Disk swapping is incredibly slow, and absolutely kills performance if you have little RAM.

      And get with the times, this is the age of multitasking. Sure, Photoshop is a memory hog, but having things like iChat, Safari, Mail, or any other various applications open at the same time will slow down your computer with 256 RAM.

    7. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 1

      I have 1.5GB in a 17" PB, and I run low occasionally. I also run Eclipse, Together Architect, Postgres, a couple of browsers, Fire, and Mail, which usually runs fine, but if I try to debug, through Eclipse, that usually pushes me over the top.

      Now would I run all of this on a mini? No. But I may use iMovie on one, and I wonder if 512MB would be enough to do this and something else at the same time (I hate not multi-tasking).

      -Ken

    8. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by radish · · Score: 1

      Wow that's a bright halogen. Mine's 15W...I thought almost all were under 20.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    9. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Cougem · · Score: 1

      'Turn off the monitor and it should make a good webserver off a UPS for quite some time.'

      Errr, what monitor?

    10. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Has it gotten better? The opinion I formed a while back was that Anandtech = Unpleasant prose.

    11. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Do you actually run a couple of browsers, or just different windows? There are good reasons to run multiple windows (web application testing, for one), I'm just kinda curious. On the subject of which, isn't that two seperate IDEs, BTW?

      Together though, is an absolute memory hog (we ditched it locally, for Eclipse, due to this). I'll happily agree that if you're going to run it, you'll need that gig of RAM...

      Have to admit, my idea of a development environment is running ant from the command line, which probably really really helps...

    12. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Or perhaps they read Anandtechs's review saying it was positively scandelous to sell the unit with 256MB RAM with such expensive upgrades."

      That or they read the feedback from Kevin Rose's web posting of his dissection of his Mac mini. While G4 has essentially chased off the entire fan base of the former TechTV show "The Screen Savers," Kevin Rose is still a trusted *geek* personality on the web... Perhaps Leo Laporte made mention of the high upgrade prices too...

      www.kevinrose.com

      www.thebroken.org

    13. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by gunnk · · Score: 1

      He was probably refering to a halogen torchiere -- the ones that fire code now requires a safety cage on to prevent it from setting drapes on fire. I had one that came with a 350W bulb -- but I upgraded to 500W (we aren't allowed space heaters in our freezing cold offices, but we CAN use halogen lamps to the same effect).

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    14. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Threni · · Score: 1

      > As to the people saying you need 1GB, what for? I've got a flatmate that does
      > graphical work on a PowerMac with 512MB

      Perhaps you need to find more than 1 person before you determine how much memory everyone else needs?

    15. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 1

      No, I actually run different browsers (and multiple windows in each browser). I have to verify that my app works with different browsers (which also means I use a win32 machine to connect to it, and sometimes even run VirtualPC, which is another hog).

      I agree Together is a hog (and worse it seems to bleed memory. I usually have to shut it down 2 or 3 times a day, because it becomes completely unresponsive), unfortunately I haven't found a UML modeling tool that is any better. There are some Eclipse plugins that are showing some promise, but aren't quite there. I would never consider doing development in Together, but I also have used Together for years, and only know it as a UML tool. Even Together's Eclipse plugin isn't as functional as the standalone version. :(

      I used to feel the same way (running ant at the command line), I have become addicted to code completion the debugger, and context senstive editor though, and can't see myself going back to vi, for development. ;)

    16. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Genom · · Score: 1

      The one you attach to it for the sole purpose of enabling ssh access =)

    17. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Wow that's a bright halogen. Mine's 15W...I thought almost all were under 20.

      I think you're confusing "halogen" with "fluorescent". Fluorescent lamps are usually under 20W. Halogen lamps tend to start around 100W and go up.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    18. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Moofie · · Score: 1

      *raises hand*

      OK, here's two. 768mb in my 12" PowerBook is more than sufficient. I've got ten apps open simultaneously with a 100mb of free memory.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    19. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by radish · · Score: 1

      No I meant halogen, but there must be different types. A google for halogen desk lamp found many in the 15-20W range as I expected, but also some in the 40-60W range.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    20. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      This is a bloody good point, BTW. While there's also the experience of myself and my other flatmate outside of graphics work, 3 people do not a trend make. /. would be a better place if more people (myself included, dang I feel dumb) remembered that.

    21. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by sessamoid · · Score: 1
      No I meant halogen, but there must be different types.

      He didn't say "desklamp", he just said "lamp". Freestanding halogen lamps usually come in 300 W models. They used to come in 500 W models in the US until some people set their drapes on fire with them and died.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    22. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by FortranDragon · · Score: 1

      Anandtech is the *latest* person to say you should buy more RAM. When I bought my old iBook in 2001 it was a common suggestion to get 512MB or, in the case of the iBook, 640MB RAM (the max). More RAM is better for power-users. :)

      For the typical user or beginner, 256MB will be a decent amount. They aren't going to be running half a dozen or a dozen apps at the same time. Maybe iTunes, iChat, Safari, plus another app at the same time. Typical users tend to single-task more because it is easier for them to focus on what they are doing.

      --
      "All the darkness in the world can not quench the light of one small candle."
    23. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      640MB RAM (the max)

      A factor of 1024 ought to be enough for anyone!

    24. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      When you replace the bulb, be sure to wipe off any place you might have touched it with an alcohol swab (like you find in a first aid kit or just a paper towel and rubbing alcohol). It's the oil from your fingers that can cause a halogen bulb to explode, or just burn out prematurely.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    25. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Everyone seems too used to Windows XP's memory usage, and is assuming OS X is similar...

      Uh, if anything, OS X needs _more_ RAM than XP for decent performance.

    26. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Squozen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Absolutely true. Every OS X window is a bitmap, which eats a fair amount of memory compared to the Windows GUI.

    27. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      but I wouldn't want to run Photoshop on one of these anyway!

      Why not? A couple of years earlier and this would be the top of the line Mac, and plenty of people ran photoshop then.

  17. old news by 69sofine · · Score: 1

    cool beans read about it earlier at macworld though

  18. Much better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's more like it. However I think 1GB ram is still a bit cheaper on MacMall or other Mac site.

  19. When they offer a 7200RPM drive as an upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps I will care! In the mean time, back to lifting weights while my girlfriend cooks.

  20. Demand by autojive · · Score: 1

    It's possible that due to the shear number of orders and demand for the Mini, Apple can capitalize on it to get better prices from their suppliers and therefore lower costs for them and pass it on to the customer.

    --
    I wish my lawn was emo, so it would cut itself.
    1. Re:Demand by AddressException · · Score: 1

      "Shear numbers"... is that like italics or something???

    2. Re:Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much like the incredible demand for the iPod lowered the price and - erm.. hmmmmm...

    3. Re:Demand by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I think it has something to do with gathering wool from sheap.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  21. damnit! by kdark1701 · · Score: 0

    I just bought one with all the upgrades last week!

    1. Re:damnit! by windex · · Score: 1

      Apple had a refund policy for this last I checked?

    2. Re:damnit! by kdark1701 · · Score: 1

      I was trying to make a joke. I never actually bought one. I would though if I had the money.

  22. Upgradablility by Cheviot · · Score: 0

    Now if it only had a PCI slot I'd be hooked.

    1. Re:Upgradablility by amichalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What do you need the PCI slot for? (not retorical)

      With the exception of Graphics, I would venture to say all consumer level options usually upgraded via PCI on a PC are either (1) built in (like Bluetooth or Firewire ports) or (2) available via Firewire (like Audio/video input/output devices).

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    2. Re:Upgradablility by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      The people that are buying these are buying it for its all-in-one-ness (sans monitor of course) and small size. I "sold" a Mac Mini to a co-worker when I told her it was $500 and had everything she needed in something the size of a large paperback book. Funny enough, even though she already had a monitor, she upped to an eMac instead.

    3. Re:Upgradablility by adamjaskie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Screw PCI. I want to be able to use my MCA cards that I bought. Nobody supports them anymore.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    4. Re:Upgradablility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want PCI in that tiny package? Can't be video or you would have said AGP, so it must be some other crazy peripheral that's not available as firewire or usb... What on Earth could it be? Oh I know, maybe a huge sound card! I guess for a studio machine you'd just have to splurge the extra $6-700 and a get: a powermac. You'd probably enjoy the extra bang for your buck now that you've given up the tiny footprint.

    5. Re:Upgradablility by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Since the whole unit is smaller than most PCI cards, I don't see that happening.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    6. Re:Upgradablility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using mbus, you insensitive clod!

    7. Re:Upgradablility by MagerValp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What do you need the PCI slot for?

      TV Tuner. I know you can get a USB tuner, but that kind of defeats the whole form factor thing.

      I'm not complaining though - this is going to be one really sweet DVD/DivX/MP3 player machine. I picked up a Remote Wonder control today, and now I can comfortably select and play movies from the couch.

      If Apple were to release a version of the mini with 6-channel sound, a TV tuner, PVR software, and a good looking remote Windows Media Center wouldn't stand a chance. It would be the iPod of the living room.

      --

      READY.
      #
    8. Re:Upgradablility by amichalo · · Score: 1

      Something worth considering (or in HDTV. They look very nice, small, and include remote ontrols

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    9. Re:Upgradablility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want a USB tuner. The bandwith you get over USB is crap, and most cards are designed to deal with low-volume data.

      With a Mac, you can get a Firewire that can stream HD quality. Plus, when you get a new mac, you can unplug the Firewire tuner and plug it in the new one.

      www.elgato.com

  23. It just gets better and better ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've already decided that before long I want a Mini and at least an iPod shuffle withing a short period of time.

    Improving the prices even more just makes it that much sexier.

    I wonder if these price drops are because they've been able to get an idea of the volume of these they'll be selling, and relying on economies of scalre just got even more attractive to them.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:It just gets better and better ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Improving the prices even more just makes it that much sexier.

      Please don't use the term "sexy" to describe technology. That usage sucked in the 90s, and now it's outdated and still sucks.

    2. Re:It just gets better and better ... by gstoddart · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Please don't use the term "sexy" to describe technology. That usage sucked in the 90s, and now it's outdated and still sucks.


      So you say. I disagree.

      I'm underwhelmed by your objection.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  24. News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next news item: McDonald's announces lower prices on certain menu options. Now half price on Chicken McNuggets!

  25. lissen by mattthateeguy · · Score: 1

    See Apple lissens, only if some other large OS manufacure would to.

    1. Re:lissen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "Listens". Not "Lissens".

    2. Re:lissen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope to god this is a troll. If not a troll, I hope to god you are from Cambodia or something and English is not your primary language.

  26. Hard drive upgrades didn't drop by fname · · Score: 4, Informative

    The hard drop upgrade was $50 before, and it's still $50 now. The article (and the MacNN story the submitter cribbed it from ) are both wrong.

    1. Re:Hard drive upgrades didn't drop by 69sofine · · Score: 1

      errr i'm pretty sure they were more

    2. Re:Hard drive upgrades didn't drop by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      The hard drop upgrade was $50 before, and it's still $50 now.

      The article was probably refering to the $600 version.

      The $500 model came with a 1.25GHz processer and a 40 GB drive. For $600 you got a 1.42GHz & 80GB.

      The CPU upgrade was pretty small, which is probably why people didn't notice it.

    3. Re:Hard drive upgrades didn't drop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did if you buy EDU.

    4. Re:Hard drive upgrades didn't drop by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I'll upgrade a mini or any other computer with a hard drop any day, for free. No guarantee the computer will still work afterwards, but there will be evidence of a hard drop.

  27. Mini Blues by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    What can you actually do with the Mini Bluetooth connection? Can you stream music from a notebook to a Mini? Or between Minis? Or is the Mini Bluetooth profile implementation limited only to headphones, or maybe just syncing to a folder on a Mac? If just headphones, where's the truly hifi Bluetooth stereo headset?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Mini Blues by eobanb · · Score: 1

      I think it's mostly for phones.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Mini Blues by tgreiner · · Score: 1

      You could use the Bluetooth mouse and/or a BT keyboard. This will leave the two USB ports unblocked...

    3. Re:Mini Blues by Matey-O · · Score: 1

      The bluetooth connection is primarily for removing the wires to the keyboard and mouse. It'll also connect to things like phones, PDAs and speakers, but I don't think that's the primary plan here. IT's pretty crummy as a networking inteface as it's capped out about about 1 MBps.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    4. Re:Mini Blues by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      So you listen to your Mini on you phone's speaker? Or you connect to iTunes over a smartphone, then "sync" to iTunes over 3G->Bluetooth?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Mini Blues by catwh0re · · Score: 4, Informative
      The OS X platform takes advantage of blue tooth with phone interfacing. A user can keep their mobile in their drawer, and screen calls, write smses, update their address book and calendar, transfer files (images, mini, mp3 etc) etc etc with the included iSync software and Address book. It's expected that head set support will make it's way in too.

      Also due to the clever way in which OS X is designed, you can set up a high speed network utilising your firewire, bluetooth, wifi and ethernet ports all simultaneously, with the file being threaded across the available connections.

    6. Re:Mini Blues by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      You should be able to do anything you can do with Bluetooth normally just fine. That is verizon that cripples things, not Apple. I can set up a network over Bluetooth on my iBook. I haven't used it at all, but I bought Bluetooth BTO so I could have the internal module when I get a bt mouse instead of a USB dongle.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    7. Re:Mini Blues by kev0153 · · Score: 1

      First thing that comes to mind is a BT keyboard and mouse.

    8. Re:Mini Blues by z-kungfu · · Score: 1

      I'll sync your phone, transfer files, keyboard and mouse, basically anything bluetooth does...

    9. Re:Mini Blues by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Informative

      What can you actually do with the Mini Bluetooth connection?

      I suspect this is pretty much intended for keyboards, mice, cell phones, PDAs, and headphones. I know the OS supports file transfer via bluetooth for both LDAP info and general files, and has some nice security options. Theoretically, it could be used for all sorts of low-bandwidth wireless applications.

      where's the truly hifi Bluetooth stereo headset?

      Did you just say, "hi-fi???" Can you even buy low tolerance components these days? I mean what is the worst tolerance on a commodity resistor these days?

    10. Re:Mini Blues by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Its for the apple bluetooth keyboard/mouse or any other bluetooth keyboard/mouse.

    11. Re:Mini Blues by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      Oh also look at the salling clicker software, use it for the remote control of popular software functions (such as DVD player and iTunes) through your mobile phone. It's a nice way to turn your mobile into a remote control for say your mac mini dvd player, or mac mini music juke box.

    12. Re:Mini Blues by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Full CD stereo sound is only 1.42Mbps; FLAC/SHN are therefore 0.7Mbps; I don't know about fat AAC, but I bet it's something like .5Mbps at minimum loss (like MP3). As long as BT latency is within a buffersize, and packetloss is miniscule, BT seems good enough for a single person (which is what PAN is for).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:Mini Blues by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's dependent on the Mini SW - can the Mini play a stream of music sent over BT from the PC? Which in turn is being downloaded live from iTunes? Can it be a Shoutcast stream? Can the PC be a smartphone (with CDMA Net connection and BT)?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:Mini Blues by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Er, when was the last time you heard a hifi speaker or headphone designed for "computers"? And what's the best sounding BT headphone you've heard? Most aren't even 2-ears, let alone stereo. These gizmos are marketed to the masses, who have rarely spent more than $20 on headphones with wires, while hifi headphones cost over $100, usually more than $200, and top out at $500 for discernably better sound - without BT.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:Mini Blues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, 2 powered USB ports are more useful than 1 powered USB port and 1 low-powered USB port that getting the wired USB Apple keyboard will result in. On the other hand, for the price difference ...

    16. Re:Mini Blues by palad1 · · Score: 1
      Also due to the clever way in which OS X is designed, you can set up a high speed network utilising your firewire, bluetooth, wifi and ethernet ports all simultaneously, with the file being threaded across the available connections.

      Care to give an example? I'd love to know how to do this with my powerbook

      signed another Mac zealot

    17. Re:Mini Blues by kopenoptop · · Score: 1
      What can you actually do with the Mini Bluetooth connection?
      Well, you can use the Bluetooth connection on the mini for all the same kinds of things you would use a bluetooth connection for on any computer. Including:
      • Transferring files to another bluetooth computer or handheld device (palm, phone, etc)
      • Syncing contacts from cell phone to computer and vise versa
      • Using your bluetooth headset from your phone to place calls through iChat's audio or video conferencing, or with skype etc.
      • Remote control your computer with a bluetooth phone or pda (handy for all those media center folks)
      • Connect wireless peripherals like mouse and keyboard or even a GPS receiver
      These are just a few of the uses I could think of off hand. I'm sure there are more, but the mini's bluetooth connection surely isn't limited to just headphone or syncing a folder.
    18. Re:Mini Blues by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about this?

      I'm a relatively new switcher and have only had my Mac hard lock up once despite the numerous trials I put it through.

      That one time was when I started copying a very large file over WiFi and then tried to plug in ethernet to see if it would speed things up.

      If you could show me some proof that this should work, I'd be willing to try it again.

    19. Re:Mini Blues by nickovs · · Score: 1

      It's expected that head set support will make it's way in too.

      Headset support is already there. It will only show up if you have up-to-date Bluetooth adaptor firmware (see Apple's bluetooth page for the updater). The Bluetooth set-up assistant will then offer the chance to set up headsets and configure them as one audio input and one audio output. I use iChatAV with a Sony Ericsson HBH-60 headset and it works very well.

      --
      If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
    20. Re:Mini Blues by Yaztromo · · Score: 2, Informative
      What can you actually do with the Mini Bluetooth connection?

      The Bluetooth support on the Mac mini is completely programmable. As such, you can do anything with it that Bluetooth supports.

      Some of the Bluetooth support that is built into OS X includes:

      • Bluetooth file transfer and browsing,
      • Bluetooth audio device support (eg: Bluetooth headsets),
      • Bluetooth networking (eg: creating a TCP/IP network within Bluetooth),
      • Bluetooth printing,
      • Bluetooth mouse and keyboard support,
      • Synchronization of Address Book and Calendar with Bluetooth enabled PDAs and cell phones,
      • Bluetooth serial support,
      • Bluetooth dial-in modems (via a Bluetooth-enabled cell phone),
      • Bluetooth SMS messaging via a cell phone,
      • Bluetooth dialing of a bluetooth-enabled cell phone,
      • Any other function or device somone wishes to develop.

      I have Bluetooth enabled on my PowerBook, and use it with a Bluetooth mouse and my Sony Ericsson T610 cell phone. The mouse works like any other wirelsss mouse (but doesn't need a dongle), and I have the phone set-up for file transfer with the PowerBook, GPRS internet connectivity for instant, on-the-road Internet connectivity, sending and receiving SMS messages from the PowerBook, dialling phone numbers, and synchronization of my address book and calendar between the phone and the PowerBook/.Mac. I haven't installed Sailing Clicker just yet (which allows you to use your bluetooth-enabled cell phone as a remote control for the Mac), but have it sitting in my Downloads directory waiting for some free time to play with it.

      In short, there is a lot of cool stuff you can do with Bluetooth -- if you have suitable Bluetooth-enabled devices.

      Yaz.

    21. Re:Mini Blues by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the details - as usual, Apple stuff "just works", just like we used to say when I worked for them 10 years ago (and people thought that Taligent would hook everything together like Lego, over something like Bluetooth in something like webpage windows). I wonder whether that means that my Treo 650 smartphone can connect to a shoutcast (MP3 stream) server over the Net (it can), connect to the Mini over its BT (maybe) and let the Mini play the shoutcast stream through its headphones (cool). Sound likely?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    22. Re:Mini Blues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does the Minimac not have microphone input?
      What other shipping systems ship without one?

    23. Re:Mini Blues by RobRancho · · Score: 1

      I think you have no idea what you are talking about (par for club Slashdot). OS X seq. tries each network interface in your "Network Ports" panel of network settings, T/X over the first avail. *Sigh*

    24. Re:Mini Blues by RobRancho · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. The parent poster has no clue about what he/she speaks. OS X simply tries each network interface (listed under "network ports") in order, until one works. As a side note, if you file trans. was started over the wireless connection, it will continue on that interface until complete. It will not "jump" or "thread" to a faster interface.

    25. Re:Mini Blues by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of the apple computer as being the headset for your bluetooth phone, since it already lets you do most other things (such as write smses)

    26. Re:Mini Blues by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      System Preferences -> Network -> Select a Connection -> Set DHCP -> Enter a DHCP id, do this for every device you want, ensuring you use the same DHCP id... and tada everything will multihome together.. Best of all finder already handles doing things like.. halfway through copying a file over airport, you plug in your ethernet cable and tada the file begins roaring in over both connections simultaneously.

    27. Re:Mini Blues by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      by the way, I've been crapping you. It only selects one connection simultaneously, however you can still multihome them all.

    28. Re:Mini Blues by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      I wonder whether that means that my Treo 650 smartphone can connect to a shoutcast (MP3 stream) server over the Net (it can), connect to the Mini over its BT (maybe) and let the Mini play the shoutcast stream through its headphones (cool). Sound likely?

      It's hard to say. Bluetooth is supposed to be able to transfer at up to 721Kbps, but when transferring data to and from my mobile phone I only tend to get roughly 5KB/s transfer rate. This could be due to the phone itself limiting the transfer rate for some reason I suppose. Unfortunately, I don't have nay other Bluetooth enabled gear (other than the mouse) to do any tests with to see if I can get closer to the maximum throughput of Bluetooth with my PowerBook.

      Still, according to the specs this should be possible -- although you could always just use iTunes on the mini to connect to your Shoutcast stream (iTunes can connect to MP3 data streams coming off the Internet), or get some Bluetooth headphones and stream directly to them without going through the mini at all.

      Yaz.

    29. Re:Mini Blues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh someone picked the troll in a normal message *well done*, but the sigh makes you look like a fucking tool. You ain't no genius love, if you were you wouldn't be reading crap threads on slashdot

    30. Re:Mini Blues by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm not as concerned about bitrate, as I am about APIs, protocols, and the various components "just working" together. My Sprint CDMA Net connection bursts up to 110Kbps, but has a 1s window average of about 50Kbps. So my personal shoutcast server sends it only low bitrate streams, which even a 5KBps BT connection would handle. I just wonder whether it will work at all, with the non-Apple device in the middle, without any iTunes/iPod awareness of its own to route the packets properly. Unless BT autoconfigures that kind of thing at the device level.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    31. Re:Mini Blues by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I've heard from numerous sources that this will be there for Tiger.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    32. Re:Mini Blues by Matey-O · · Score: 1

      Until he starts syncing his phone and dragging the mouse at the same time. I'll keep the wire for the speakers...as long as they need ANOTHER wire for power, it's not that big a deal.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    33. Re:Mini Blues by wembley · · Score: 1

      A user can keep their mobile in their drawer

      Your mobile consistently works inside a drawer?

      You must be in Europe or something...

      --

      Share and Enjoy!

    34. Re:Mini Blues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of bluetooth and phones. I've never had a use for a cell phone. But are there any "regular" cordless landline phones that support bluetooth? I'm guessing no, but it would be nice to have callerid pop up on the screen when a call comes in so I don't have to run across the house to the phone just to find out it was some stupid wrong number.

    35. Re:Mini Blues by MagnusDredd · · Score: 1

      My wife and I also have Sony T610s. Man are they sweet... Have you by chance grabbed a copy of Romeo? It's an application that allows you to control the machine from your phone via bluetooth. This is great for Powerpoint/Keynote if you have to use them, as well as iTunes and mouse control.

    36. Re:Mini Blues by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Dammit!

      You had me hoping that I'd finally be able to transfer this 17 Meg file that's been taking 20 minutes.

      OK, that's it. I'm starting a Holy War!

      Sincerely,

      Kottke*

      *Not really Kottke

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    37. Re:Mini Blues by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      My wife and I also have Sony T610s. Man are they sweet... Have you by chance grabbed a copy of Romeo? It's an application that allows you to control the machine from your phone via bluetooth. This is great for Powerpoint/Keynote if you have to use them, as well as iTunes and mouse control.

      I've downloaded Sailing Clicker, which does the same thing, but haven't installed it just yet. It's limited to a maximum number of clicks without registration, so maybe I'll check out Romeo as well.

      I've been waiting for my copy of iWork to ship, as I want to test these with Keynote 2 (I don't have Keynote 1). For now for remote control work I just use my Apple Bluetooth Mouse (which has the same range, if not all of the same abilities).

      But giving it a try is high on my to-do list! :).

      Yaz.

    38. Re:Mini Blues by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      5% on resistors in high volume, I've seen 10%s floating around in lower quantities (Rat Shack, basically), though I suspect they're more expensive or even unavailable in volume.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    39. Re:Mini Blues by MagnusDredd · · Score: 1

      Romeo is Free, Sailing Clicker is not.

      Romeo works very well, hence no need for spending hard earned money...

  28. Changes made to EU stores as well by Kinniken · · Score: 1

    Like with the Mac Mini itself, the prices are the same in dollars and euros - which considering that the euro is worth 1.3 $ and taking into account the 20% value-added tax, means we are still ripped of by 10%...

    Anyway, this sweeten an already sweet deal. I only regret that the upgrade to 512 RAM, a must-have for anyone not buying a Mac Mini solely for email & the web, is still an over-priced 80 . Ah well, I guess I'll install the added RAM myself then.

    --
    What do you know about World Politic? Find out in this quiz
    1. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing for people in Europe to remember about the price differences: Americans still have to pay sales taxes in addition to the price listed on Apple's site. I live in Texas, and our sales tax rate is around 8.75%. While VAT is usually included in the cost of items in the EU, sales tax is almost never included in listed prices in the U.S. While the sales tax doesn't make up all the difference in price, it goes a long way toward creating price parity.

    2. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      It's pretty much the same all over the world. Apple Japan is much more expensive than Apple US currently. It was cheaper for me to buy my iBook in the US and ship it air mail than it was to just buy it in Japan. I have too much time on my hands, so I will calculate just how much in dollars the base mac mini costs in various countries:
      Canada: $629 CAd=$511 US, that one not so bad
      UK: 339 pounds=$638, ouch!
      Sweden: 4695 kronor = $675
      Euro zone: 499 Euro = $652(slightly cheaper in the UK!)
      Japan: 58590 Yen = $568
      So yeah, aside from Canada where the difference is minimal, the rest of Apple's major markets are getting screwed.

    3. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


      Also, since Macs are built here in the US, who knows what kind of export fees Apple has to pay to sell them over seas. I know if you order straight from Apple, you pay for that kind of stuff in your shipping. But if Apple sells their machines in stores over there in Europe (and I don't know if they do or not) then the price would obviously have to include the added cost of getting the machine over there.

      Just like paying more for a European car (which I have) here in the states...importing costs money.

    4. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by iJames · · Score: 2, Informative
      Anyway, this sweeten an already sweet deal. I only regret that the upgrade to 512 RAM, a must-have for anyone not buying a Mac Mini solely for email & the web, is still an over-priced 80 . Ah well, I guess I'll install the added RAM myself then.

      Um, hate to break it to you, but you'd be paying that same $80 from Crucial. You can't just add another 256MB DIMM; there's only one slot. You'll have to buy a 512MB and take out the DIMM that's already there.

    5. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      When did Apple start building machines in the US? My last machine was built in Taiwan and my iPod was assembled in China.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    6. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Like with the Mac Mini itself, the prices are the same in dollars and euros - which considering that the euro is worth 1.3 $ and taking into account the 20% value-added tax, means we are still ripped of by 10%...

      Out of curiosity, does that include sales tax as well?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    7. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by twoshortplanks · · Score: 1
      You forgot to take account of local tax laws.
      UK: 339 pounds=$638, ouch!
      638 / 1.175 = $462 without VAT (sales tax).

      So I assume the american site has 8% sales tax included.

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    8. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by sbryant · · Score: 1

      Also, since Macs are built here in the US...

      The Macs for Europe are apparently assembled in Cork, Ireland. Granted, the components come from other places, but those are generally in the Far East, not in the US. You also can't buy a Mac directly from the US if you're in Europe.

      There are still shipping costs of course, but there is no extra import taxation due to the trade agreements within the EU. The only thing that differs is the VAT - 17.5% in England, 16% in Germany, 25% in Sweden etc.

      As for cars... I don't know what you have, but if you live in Germany, it's cheaper to buy a VW from Spain and have it transported back, even though the car was made in Germany in the first place!

      While there are legitimate reasons for increasing prices for certain regions, they real reason companies charge more is normally just because they can.

      -- Steve

    9. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you add Bluetooth and Airport Extreme it'll cost you £152 in the UK. If you add them separately Bluetooth is £35 and Airport Extreme is £49.

      I hope Calculator.app is more accurate...

    10. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Like with the Mac Mini itself, the prices are the same in dollars and euros - which considering that the euro is worth 1.3 $ and taking into account the 20% value-added tax, means we are still ripped of by 10%..."

      Why is it Apple's fault if the EU rips off its own "citizenry"? If you want change, take part in your European Parliament elections (since less than 10% of the electorate actually votes in most EU "Member States" in those elections) and vote in candidates committed to throwing out the VAT. If you are a Brit or a member of that former imperial possession known as Ireland, then you can blame the tax-and-spend regimes of France and Germany who insist upon tax harmonization throughout the EU for you having to pay VAT charges. Neither of those two bastions of "Old Europe" want any tax competition between "Member States" (i.e. sovereign nation-states) like what goes on between the States in the USA. But don't blame Apple for that wasteful and undemocratic regime of Brussels.

      Now, if you want Apple to charge better prices in the EU, perhaps you should buy shares and insist on Apple splitting off its European subsidiary so that there would be no need (for tax purposes) to convert foreign currencies back into American dollars for the parent company. But complaining about it on Slashdot won't do any good.

    11. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Actually no, in the US every state has a different tax rate, and Apple charges the tax to where you ship the computer. In PA, where I live, it's 6%, however in Marlyand it's only 5% but in New York State it's 8.25%. Some local municipalities also have extra taxes added on, but I don't know if Apple tax those into account.

    12. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, there is no sales tax in Europe. (Somehow I'm waiting for someone from, uhm.. Portugal or wherever to call me an ignorant fuck. Ah well, go ahead.) It's a bit of a stretch but one could say VAT being similar to a sales tax, at least for a consumer.

    13. Re:Changes made to EU stores as well by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      No sales tax, no -- unless it's levied at a muncipal level in some EU member states. We all follow the V.A.T. model... unless maybe Slovakia is different? I know they have a flat tax regime, so maybe it's somehow different there.

  29. The "Why" is the question by amichalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This news has lots of people asking "What about exisitng orders" (they got e-mails notifying them of refunds of the difference), but the real question is why, four days after product availability, did Apple do this?

    Possible reasons:
    - Sales figures in first tow weeks overwhelming under BTO projections
    - Analysts/Fans complained of over priced BTO
    - Yet-to-be-released products with similar BTO pricing coming sooner than Apple originally planned
    - Margins on BTO items are higher, even at reduced prices, than margins on the original equipment.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:The "Why" is the question by nine-times · · Score: 1
      - Yet-to-be-released products with similar BTO pricing coming sooner than Apple originally planned

      There are rumors that the Powerbooks are getting a speed bump, and maybe some other upgrades, soon. Well, the Mac mini is basically the same hardware as the powerbook, just minus the screen/keyboard/trackpad. Maybe there's a connection there?

    2. Re:The "Why" is the question by kyrre · · Score: 1

      How about this? Apple prepared lots of BTO boxes with Bluetooth and hard drive upgrades before the launch. But because of the price almost no one bothered ordering Bluetooth and 80gb upgrades for their systems. Now Apple has lots of upgraded Mac Minis, but is getting short on barebone systems.

      Apple now hope to get rid of their stock of mac minis with bluetooth, Airport, 512MB ram, and 80GB hard drive.

      This theory does not however address the 4x to 8x superdrive issue. Maybe Apple bought the last batch of 4x from that their supplier inteded to manufacture.

    3. Re:The "Why" is the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You idiot MAC conspiracy theorists crack me up. Man, any POSSIBLE connection, no matter how improbable, is enough to work you fags up into a frenzy. In fact, the more improbable it is, the more excited and pathetic you get. What a bunch of losers.

  30. Yeah thats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    still a pretty s%$#% deal, i mean $325 for a gig?

    sigh! at least the superdrive speed is better now :|

    1. Re:Yeah thats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you're smart enough to order on the education store and get the further discount, being that you're still living in your old bedroom in your Mom's house.

  31. This a Joke? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    UK Apple store upgrades for the Mac Mini:

    Bluetooth upgrade + 35.00 UKP

    Airport upgrade + 49.00 UKP

    Bluetooth AND Airport upgrade + 152.88 UKP



    WTF?!

    1. Re:This a Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      UK Apple store upgrades for the Mac Mini:

      Bluetooth upgrade + 35.00 UKP

      Airport upgrade + 49.00 UKP

      Bluetooth AND Airport upgrade + 152.88 UKP


      It's because that last price is in metric pounds, while the others are in imperial pounds.

    2. Re:This a Joke? by Cloud+9 · · Score: 0

      You can get one module or the other, not both. Hence the (albeit more expensive) option for both on one module. Stop bitching.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    3. Re:This a Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LOL, yeah, I just saw that when trying to configure an equivalent system in the UK site to the US one I posted higher up. I imagine the price is meant to be half that for the combined upgrade - £75 or something.

    4. Re:This a Joke? by sokoban · · Score: 0

      Well, I'd buy that except the US Apple store doesn't charge more than the price of the BT and AP modules separately for buying them together. In the US, Bluetooth is $50 Airport extreme is $79, and the combo card is $99.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    5. Re:This a Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass. It's an error. The Bluetooth and Airport cards are on a small 'mezzanine' card sticking out of the motherboard. You can attach one or the other to this mezzanine card, or both. It's a pricing error.

    6. Re:This a Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you wish you'd read the post you replied to instead of making the extremely embarrassing post that everyone is reading and thinking how awful your mathematics is.

    7. Re:This a Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It maybe an error, i hope to god it is, however i spoke to apple sales and they said that the pricing was correct. Im praying for clueless sales staff.

      Mind you, have you seen the memory prices, £550 odd for 1gb on the 1.25ghz or £220 for the same upgrade on the 1.42ghz.

      Either way its weak that they can't get it right or have a uniform pricing structure.

  32. kitchen computer by musikit · · Score: 1, Interesting

    was thinking about getting a mini for my kitchen however i want to minimize kitchen top space.

    i figured i'd use a 12" LCD and sit it on top of the mini.

    Can anyone recommend a bluetooth 1/2 sized keyboard?

    1. Re:kitchen computer by trudyscousin · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to this (second paragraph), nothing's supposed to be placed on top of the box. Pressure on the top may prevent a CD or DVD from being ejected.

      You can, however, use the Mac mini on its side.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
    2. Re:kitchen computer by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hell, take out the dishwasher and you could park an IBM AS/400 under the counter. Why settle for a Mac Mini when you could be running an enterprise class server, right in your kitchen?

      You could even augment this by placing an external disk array cabinet in place of the refrigerator.

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    3. Re:kitchen computer by Ironsides · · Score: 1
      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    4. Re:kitchen computer by iwrigley · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest the 12" iBook instead, actually: built-in screen, keyboard and trackpad (obviously), probably about the same cost as the mini-plus-screen, and more versatile (since you can take it anywhere you want with no hassle).

    5. Re:kitchen computer by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      "i figured i'd use a 12" LCD and sit it on top of the mini."

      I thought of that too, but it turns out that Apple recommends not placing objects on top of the Mini. The top of the case can press down onto the dvd/cd drive, which can damage or at least disturb the mechanism. Also, the BT and Airport antennae are located on the top of the box, and objects placed next to them (case is plastic) can interfere with proper operation.

      I'd expect this to be fixed in the next version! Lots of people may find themselves with a damaged Mini.

    6. Re:kitchen computer by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Clearly Black & Decker needs to release a new line of their Spacemaker appliances that will mount in a standard rack along with an Xserve. I need a 4U toaster oven.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    7. Re:kitchen computer by hammeredpeon · · Score: 1

      how the F is that insightful?

      --
      best college pickem site ever: pickem.terrbear.org
    8. Re:kitchen computer by supergiovane · · Score: 1
      how the F is that insightful?

      I had the same question. I threw it at the AS/400 I have in my kitchen and it gave me the answer: 42.

      --
      Signatures are for stupids.
    9. Re:kitchen computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "was thinking about getting a mini for my kitchen however i want to minimize kitchen top space."

      You write a column for PBS and your first name is Robert, eh?

    10. Re:kitchen computer by bwy · · Score: 1

      You could even augment this by placing an external disk array cabinet in place of the refrigerator.

      Well, I put in a tape silo. But, to each his own.

    11. Re:kitchen computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know... I know a lot of people who never use their kitchens. Maybe it DOES make sense to turn it into a datacenter...

    12. Re:kitchen computer by Cederic · · Score: 1


      Hey, you didn't think of it. :)

    13. Re:kitchen computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because "Funny" doesn't give Karma, so we should all boycott "Funny" and use "Insightful" instead.

  33. Not Likely by goldspider · · Score: 0, Troll
    "Apple can capitalize on it to get better prices from their suppliers and therefore lower costs for them and pass it on to the customer."

    Or more likely (as most companies do), keep it for themselves.

    Let's not forget that Apple is still a for-profit corporation.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Not Likely by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Or more likely (as most companies do), keep it for themselves.

      Remember that every time the price drops more people buy the thing.

      --
      -mkb
  34. Classic TV Shopping technique.. by OlivierB · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. Start by announcing something cheaper than competition or usual
    2. Stress out benefits of given product so potential buyers actually think it's good value.
    3. Let early buyers get in.
    4. For those still undecided, actually improve the deal (i.e more features, ie. superdrive) and/or cut the price
    5. Those actually undecided that thought it was already good value now think this is fantastic value.
    6. Sell like crazy

    I think this technique is call "push-over" or something like that. The key to it is to convince people that even at a premium your product is fantastical value (Apple sure knows a lot ib this field). The more you convince people at step 2, the easier the push-over.
    IMHO, APPLE had it all laid out. They knew they could make the fat margins with early adopters and then have the extra publicity announcing this. It keeps the momentum...

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
    1. Re:Classic TV Shopping technique.. by sqlgeek · · Score: 1, Funny

      Step 4.5 Include, absolutely free, at no cost to you, Ginsu(tm) knives!

    2. Re:Classic TV Shopping technique.. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Your method works only over a longer time period, such as when they've already filled orders.

      From the forums I'm on, people whose orders didn't even ship yet said that their price was reduced.

    3. Re:Classic TV Shopping technique.. by rthille · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, your list is pretty good...

      "But Wait! There's MORE!" :-)

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    4. Re:Classic TV Shopping technique.. by OlivierB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are right there is more.

      I forgot to mention the scarcity aspect that "seals the deal".
      People *MUST* buy it now or else regret taking too long to make up their minds and wait 6 months to get it!

      Just have a look at the iPod shuffle. Apple knew they were gonna sell this like there is no tomorrow. Heck just a year ago they were in shortage of Ipod Minis for twice the price!

      They have mastered the science in creating envy from their fan base and a key element to that is making sure there is never enough at first for all but a few "lucky" consumers.

      Who hasn't heard Apple stories were people were gratefull for being able to *buy* an Apple product?

      Heck I am happy to throw some cash in for products I like but I don't feel lucky. Some people do because Apple (and other premium brand companies) can make these people believe that the cash they are handing over is worth LESS than what they get.

      Long live Apple.

      --
      Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
    5. Re:Classic TV Shopping technique.. by omahajim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, with the 10-day after ship price protection, and automatic price changes on not-yet-shipped orders, your conspiracy falls apart. None of the 'early adopters' got screwed on this one, despite your suggestions. Anyone smart enough to call Apple got refunds. Story over.

      Now about that "8x" Superdrive...

    6. Re:Classic TV Shopping technique.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, actually, that would be:

      "Now...... One... More... Thing..........."

      [crowd lets out collective breath....]

    7. Re:Classic TV Shopping technique.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. except in Nebraska!

    8. Re:Classic TV Shopping technique.. by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      7. Profit!!1!

    9. Re:Classic TV Shopping technique.. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Some people do because Apple (and other premium brand companies) can make these people believe that the cash they are handing over is worth LESS than what they get.

      Well, the basic premise of buying something is that the thing is worth more to you than the money. Otherwise you'd rather keep the money.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    10. Re:Classic TV Shopping technique.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe demand simply outstripped Apple projections, and they now know they call mass produce the shit at lower cost.

      Wouldn't surprise me. Everybody I talk to loves these things - except maybe our Microsoft rep. :)

  35. Retail stores and keyboards by azpenguin · · Score: 1

    While Apple has hit a home run with a certain niche of their markets (myself included) I wonder if they're going to have to play with their pricing model a bit more and the marketing to get more people to switch to the Mini. I was in the Apple store this weekend, and they had Minis up and running, with the Apple keyboard and mouse and the 20" LCD display. The price card mentioned the monitor in very small type, and said nothing about the keyboard and mouse that I saw. If you thought you were getting a full computer set, you would have had to find out fom the sales staff - possibly after you said you'd buy one - that you needed the keyboard and mouse. And the Apple set is $59. They may have to come down on that item, or be more aggressive about informing the retail store customers that you can use whatever USB keyboard and mouse you want. People looking for the Mini know this. A lot of the potential "switch" market doesn't. The Apple wireless keyboard is even more expensive, and it requires Bluetooth. That may have also had a bit of a hand in them lowering Bluetooth prices.

    1. Re:Retail stores and keyboards by 0BoDy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      btw: somewhat wrong. apple keyboard costs 29.00 [-student discount 26.00] and includes the very neccesary usb hub. bluetooth not actually required get your facts straight.

      Buy a mounse at office depot for $10 (or $14 NOW, I guess here,
      or your local computer retailer. Compare to base-line dell offering with intel extreme graphics, intel celeron CPU, etc.

      mac mini still plays ut2005 without lag, only slightly jumpy running @ 800x600 32bit etc, etc.

      This competes with any base-lline x86 system very well.

      I like that I can pick My display or buy the apple dvi to rca connector and use my TV. you won't see that sort of a thing on a pc either, nor at that form factor sie, quality, etc.

      --
      Can I be a Luddite too?
    2. Re:Retail stores and keyboards by azpenguin · · Score: 1

      The keyboard is $29. The keyboard and mouse together is $50. The wireless (which if you use Apple's wireless keyboard and mouse, Bluetooth is required - check their site) set is more expensive the the wired USB set. You can buy an aftermarket mouse, but my point was that Apple shows the nice setup in the store and doesn't make clear to the casual shopper right away that keyboard and mouse aren't included. Not making that clear could upset the "impulse buy" shopper they're after.

  36. Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps Apple actually listened to people complaining about overpriced upgrades.

    Or they just weren't selling fast enough.

    1. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're sold out of production for 4 weeks already. Hardly not "selling fast enough".

      Also clearly Apple have now got rid of their old stock of 4x Superdrives.

    2. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they weren't selling fast enough, I could get a ship time faster than 3-4 weeks. They're selling plenty well despite you slashdotters apparent contempt for apple and this computer.

    3. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because it isn't like a company could add an artificial delay.

  37. So much for quiet by bigtangringo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple has quietly lowered the price...

    Quiet, until the story was slashdotted.

    --
    Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    1. Re:So much for quiet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As usual however, the story was public in other forums well before Slashdot got around to it. See MacRumors, AppleInsider, Macworld, MacMinute, MacNN, etc etc. Slashdot editors couldn't peg a breaking story quick enough if it came up and bit them on the ass (which stories usually do to /. editors).

      Slashdot is *not* about breaking news.

  38. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple can't possibly be cutting prices. Everyone knows they overprice everything. What's that? Unix core? Windows/Mac filesharing? FTP server? Web server? SSH Remote Login? HD Video editor? Photo Editing/Library software? Multitrack recording loop based music editor/recorder/midi sequencer? DVD Authoring suite that doesn't have cheesy templates? Microsoft Word compatible word processor? CDRW/DVD combo drive? Firewire? USB 2.0? DVI/VGA/S-Video output? Radeon 9200 AGP graphics? Print server for Macs and PCs? Quicken 2005?
    I'm sure I left stuff out, and people will fix my quick attempts at describing this thing.

    All this in a TINY little 6.5x6.5x2 inch encloser?

    How much?
    $499.00!!!!!

    Let's get the Windows fanboy's rebuttals out now:
    D00d...I lub j00r one butt0n m0u5e..BWAHAHAHAHAHA

  39. Price Protection. by Luckboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Apple Store offers price protection for products ub to ten day AFTER SHIPMENT, not ordering. The policy and the phone number to call can be found here. I called last night and they've credited my card.

    As far as the superdrive goes, I ordered mine the day it was announced, and it arrived two days before the official release date. It came with an 8X Superdrive.

    1. Re:Price Protection. by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I don't think its fair that consumers should have to call on units that haven't shipped. They should either offer something in the automatic form of a credit - and - for those who just bought the system and had it delivered, a credit should be applied. Its the least they could do. You have to consider that they knew about the price cut more than 10 days (presumably months) ahead of time.

    2. Re:Price Protection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on now we're to lazy to call about rebaits?

      To quote Dr. Nick .... "What a country"

    3. Re:Price Protection. by avdp · · Score: 1

      And how many people won't call?
      It's the same scheme as mail-in rebates. They just know only x percentage of people bother with mailing them in.

    4. Re:Price Protection. by Longstaff · · Score: 1

      They don't have to call. A cow-orker of mine ordered his with bluetooth/airoprt the day after the expo and has a ship date of Feb 11th. Apple sent him email yesterday letting him know that his account had been credited $30.

  40. Mac Mini Upgrades by p0rnking · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    With the old prices, an upgraded mac mini ends up costing well over $1000, and for that price, I can get a lot more in a PC.

    IMO, I think one of the reasons they came out with the mac mini, is to get more people to try out a mac, and hopefully convert them to their side. Personally, I won't go and spend $2000 for a Mac to try out. But for $500, I'm willing to purchase one, especially now with the new lower upgrade prices

    1. Re:Mac Mini Upgrades by p0rnking · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually, I'm not willing to get one.
      On the Canadian store, I just priced one out and it comes up to $1300 ($976 with 512Mb Ram).
      - 1.42GHz G4
      - 4x SuperDrive (+$130)
      - 80 GB Ultra ATA
      - 1Gb Ram (+$422)

      And to top it all off, it comes with a 32MB vid card.

      So much for being "affordable"

    2. Re:Mac Mini Upgrades by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      What does it run if you just bump up the RAM? Just curious because the $499 model with enough added RAM to make things snappy should handle that whole "Surfing the web, sending the email, shopping on ebay" thing that mom and pop want to do without being bombarded by spyware, viruses, and pop-ups. The 32MB video card should in no way impede them.

      I just don't think you are the target audience here pOrnking. Niether am I really so I'm not planning on buying one either but for what it is it's a pretty good value. It's affordable enough. It's just not what I (or you apparently) need and want.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    3. Re:Mac Mini Upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't "try out a mac" configuration though.

      512MB DDR333 SDRAM - 1 DIMM
      40GB Ultra ATA drive
      Combo Drive
      Wired Keyboard & Mouse Set - U.S. English
      56K v.92 Modem
      Mac OS X - U.S. English
      1.25GHz PowerPC G4

      Estimated Ship:
      3-4 weeks
      Free Shipping
      Subtotal CDN$804.00

      You've just bumped up the price massively by choosing an overkill 1GB RAM for the system. Maybe Dell sells 1GB of RAM as an upgrade for "1GB (dual channel) shared DDR SDRAM at 400MHz [add $300]" .. but wait, that is 2 DIMMs, which is cheaper. Blame Apple for making a computer 1/8th the volume of a Shuttle SFF box that can only hold 1 DIMM.

    4. Re:Mac Mini Upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But mom and pop can surf the web, send email and shop on eBay without being bombarded by spyware, viruses and pop-ups ALREADY.

      They install Firefox.

      Need a word-processor? OpenOffice.org

      Mac Minis are cool, but they don't have much to offer that kind of audience. Windows is a heap of shit for real use, but for just Web browsing and writing a few letters, it's no problem (firewall it off, only make Firefox and OOo available).

  41. nice advertisement by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

    We get mad when Microsoft pays slashdot to put up an ad, yet apple gets their advertisement (and a discussion forum about it) for free.

    Not entirely fair, I know, since MS was spreading FUD about Linux, but still....

  42. Mac Mini kind of disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I received my 1.42/80GB Mac Mini yesterday along with a 1GB Dimm from a 3rd party vendor. Even with the 1GB RAM the performance is still sluggish, kind of reminds me of using a Knoppix Live CD. Firefox is kind of quirky with dragging bookmarks sometimes it hangs when trying to open another instance. Open Office performed better than I had expected after all the X11 bashing.

    On the plus side it runs very cool and is very quiet

    1. Re:Mac Mini kind of disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the performance is still sluggish, kind of reminds me of using a Knoppix Live CD.

      Maybe the slow 2.5" 4,200 RPM laptop harddrive on the Mini is reminding you of the slow CD when using Knoppix? The slow harddrive is what drives me nuts when using iBooks, and the Mini's use the same harddrives. I'll buy a Mini when you can get one with a 7200 RPM drive.

      > Open Office performed better than I had expected after all the X11 bashing.

      Use it a few days. For the 20 users I tested with, their opinion of it started at about 4 on a 1-10 scale and went down over the next 10 days we used it.

      We did the same test over again with NeoOffice/J and 20 different users, and it scored a 6. The only problem was that every single one of the users complained about it being slow.

      After all of that, we bought Microsoft Office to run on our 1,200 iBooks because we found-out we qualified for the $135 education discount. Our users rated it a 9 out of 10. Ouch! I was really hoping to get completely away from Microsoft at this time, but maybe when we do the next round of upgrades.

    2. Re:Mac Mini kind of disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The HDD in that thing is a fistful of ass, too.

    3. Re:Mac Mini kind of disappointing by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Even with the 1GB RAM the performance is still sluggish, kind of reminds me of using a Knoppix Live CD.

      If the sluggish performance you see is mostly during operations that read or write a lot of data to the hard drive, the problem is almost certainly the slow notebook hard drive. Hard drive speed in notebooks has been a problem for years, it's the one thing that really holds them back from totally replacing desktops for a lot of disk-intensive uses. And in order to make a whole computer that small, you have to use a notebook hard drive.

      If you're interested in making it perform more like a desktop machine, try replacing the 4200rpm (5400rpm?) notebook drive inside with a 7200rpm notebook drive. I've never seen one before now, but apparently Hitachi just started making 40GB and 60GB 7200rpm drives. You've already replaced the RAM yourself, so this shouldn't be too difficult. I think you'll be shocked by the difference in performance. Oh, and check out the warranty on the 60GB model: 3 years! All the reviewers say it runs about as cool as the drives they are replacing, so heat shouldn't be a problem. The 8MB buffer should help too.

      I wouldn't be too surprised if Apple started using these very same drives in updated versions of the Mac mini. It would certainly stem a lot of the "my Mac mini is slow" comments. Then again, an improved Mac mini might start competing a little too well with the Power Mac line.

      While you're at Newegg you might want to pick up a Macally Firewire/USB enclosure for your 80GB drive so you can use it as external storage/backup. The notebook-size enclosures can usually be powered by the Firewire bus, so no extra power adapters or wires. One tiny computer with desktop-level power, one tiny external storage drive connected with a single cable.

      Dammit, I'm drooling on my keyboard again...

  43. 8X is not 8X DVD write! by pebs · · Score: 5, Informative

    The 8X drive is only for reading DVD, the write speed for DVD is still 4X.

    --
    #!/
    1. Re:8X is not 8X DVD write! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although Apple explains this away as a simple typo, it smells bait-and-switchish to me. I ordered a mini based on an 8x Superdrive as advertised in the BTO options on Apple. Then we find out that Apple mis-advertised it. Grr.

      No biggie, I still probably would have bought the mini regardless, I just wouldn't have bought the Superdrive upgrade if it was definitely 4x, since I have that in another mac already.

      Of course, if I wasn't so hot under the collar, I wouldn't have been caught out with that, but Apple posted it as an 8x, I didn't.

    2. Re:8X is not 8X DVD write! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, it is false advertising. Looks like they changed their options to read 4X again on the website..

    3. Re:8X is not 8X DVD write! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Does the SuperDrive support writing to dual-layer DVD media? Apple's site doesn't say.

      This is the problem with Apple's habit of slapping a Happy Fun Name on everything -- in computer hardware, the long chains of numbers in a product specification often MATTER.

    4. Re:8X is not 8X DVD write! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      This is the problem with Apple's habit of slapping a Happy Fun Name on everything -- in computer hardware, the long chains of numbers in a product specification often MATTER.

      Bah! Isn't it obvious what standard they built to with the Airport Penultimate Bleeding Edge Extreme?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:8X is not 8X DVD write! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "This is the problem with Apple's habit of slapping a Happy Fun Name on everything "

      This is a feature, not a bug. There are zillions of web sites that list in excruciating detail the nuts and bolts of each model, for the few people (like me) who care. Like, I dunno, Apple's.

      Hint: A spec sheet does not make a good product name.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:8X is not 8X DVD write! by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      As near as I can tell, it's the same old superdrive that's been in Macs for years.

      Considering my roomate couldn't read my DVD-R with once, I wouldn't touch it.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  44. The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by netringer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I spent the weekend researching the 20" iMac G5 the GF is getting. In the process of trying to figure out what/when the new iLife 05 and iWork software would be bundled with it (at no $19.95 handling fee. Anybody know?)

    I got caught up in the Mac Mini frenzy. To me $499 is impluse buy pricing. I figured it was worth it to let me have my first Mac to enjoy and learn on. I had been holding out for the next gen PowerBook. I went to the Apple Store and began an order.

    $100 more for the SuperDrive and faster CPU. I'll buy my own RAM and deal with a putty knife to put it in. Yeah, I need Wi-Fi and Bluetooth because you can't add that afterwards. Applecare? Good idea. Now it was $800, even with my educational discount. It was no longer in impulse buy range. I left the site.

    You think maybe that Apple saw that happening again and again and took this action to keep the buyer there until they completed the order?

    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    1. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      IMO, the built-in Bluetooth ain't worth it. I've got a usb bt dongle from Linksys which is truly class 1 (100m) for $50 and the built-in bluetooth is only class 3 (10m). I can now surf the internet from anywhere in the house on my Palm Tungsten T3, but I wouldn't be able to with the built-in Mac adapter, and they cost the same.

      If you're just looking for wireless mice, printers, and keyboards it might be worth it, but if you have a PDA, skip it.

    2. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by mikeee · · Score: 1

      I believe anything after the 22nd should have the '05 iLife, but am not 100% sure if it's based on order or ship or build date...

    3. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by ThousandStars · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I got caught up in the Mac Mini frenzy. To me $499 is impluse buy pricing. I figured it was worth it to let me have my first Mac to enjoy and learn on. I had been holding out for the next gen PowerBook. I went to the Apple Store and began an order.

      $100 more for the SuperDrive and faster CPU. I'll buy my own RAM and deal with a putty knife to put it in. Yeah, I need Wi-Fi and Bluetooth because you can't add that afterwards. Applecare? Good idea. Now it was $800, even with my educational discount. It was no longer in impulse buy range. I left the site.

      Not surprisingly, if you want everything and the kitchen sink, the MM's going to cost more. Frankly, if it were me, I wouldn't bother with Applecare on such an inexpensive machine, and I'd get 512MB of RAM and *maybe* wireless. Probably no wireless. That's $575 for what's almost a disposable computer. For more storage space, I'd use an external FW HD, since that will transfer between computers.

      If you want all those extras, you're probably not *really* the mini's target audience. Even so, I still think the mini with 512MB of RAM and airport is a deal.

    4. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      I thought it was cheaper to upgrade RAM via Apple ($75) than buy 512mb... unless you plan to go the full gig?

    5. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by radish · · Score: 1

      I had exactly the same experience. I'm a PC guy, but my GF has an iBook and as usual I get roped in to support it. Problem is I know nothing about Mac OS so it seemed like a nice idea to have a mini to learn on, and see what all the fuss is about. $500 is what I'd spend on a cheap PC, and it seemed like a good deal. But once I'd added the wireless ($100?? Costs $30 on a PC), memory upgrade (HOW MUCH??) and other required things it became somewhat overpriced (IMHO).

      Close, but no cigar.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by infinii · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So the added cost of AppleCare (3yr extended warranty I believe) made you reconsider because it became too expensive. And yet when all the Apple-bashers talk about how cheap a beige box is, they NEVER buy extended warranties.

      Speaking of boxes, let me get on my soapbox and address all the bashers.

      I can't believe so many people can't figure it out. Sure it costs more than your x86 box. But you wanna know something? You are paying for industrial design AND the computing experience (software). Bitch and whine all you want about how the harddrive, cpu, video card are slower than your custom built beige gamer box, but in the end it's not about FPS, read times and floating point instructions per second, what counts is how well the computer allows you to do what you want to do. IMNSHO, Apple software along with the design of it's computers makes my life easier and that is worth a price premium. All you turd-fuckers can't figure that out and only cry about the price/performance based on hardware merits. Last time I checked, you weren't pushing and popping bits onto the processor, the most critical thing you are seeing/using is the software. Hardware has become a commodity. The value is in the software. Don't believe me? I think the entire OSS movement has made you delusional. Just cuz it's free doesn't mean it has no value. There is a difference between good software and bad. Ignore the entire hardware argument, sit down and ask yourself how much you think OS X and iLife are worth. Honestly, don't fool yourself...give it a fair estimate. Compare it to other similar software and come up with a dollar value. You can tell me that Windows comes preinstalled or Linux is free blah blah blah...but if I offered you the choice for free, which of those 3 OS'es would you run (ignore all technical limitations such as OS X won't run on x86, etc...this is just for argument sake)? OS X right? There, that tells you that you place more value in OS X than the other two. Now then...that $499 seem so bad?

      How about the software that comes preinstalled, allowing you to literally open the box, power it up and actually be able to use it? Put that in contrast with the Windows or Linux experience, how much time do you need to spend installing and customizing those boxes before they are actually useable? Even assuming that the stuff you install afterwards is all free, it's still time saved. Ok fry-boy, maybe your time is cheap but mine isn't.

      If you bashers insist on comparing it on hardware alone, then move on because there's nothing for you here. You will never think Apple products are affordable. It's funny how many of you bitch that their memory upgrades are a rip-off, so you're not going to make the switch. If you were going into a restaurant to eat a burger but they had an overpriced salad on the menu, would it stop you from eating the burger? The choice is yours. if the overpriced ram is stopping you from buying an Apple, you're lying to yourself because you are only looking for an excuse, you were never going to buy one to begin with.

    7. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by MrMastadon · · Score: 1

      Well said. Everyone is guessing 'why'. I think you nailed it. Your experience is exactly what mine was. I could not get over price of the RAM upgrade and left the site - twice. Classic price gouging IMHO. I cannot figure out why more people were not upset about this.

    8. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by Mattintosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mention an external Firewire HD, which brings up an interesting side point.

      Why bother upgrading the internal HD in the Mini to a larger 4200 RPM drive, when you can easily go out and buy a 7200 RPM FW HD that will work just as well if not better?

    9. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by dan+the+person · · Score: 1

      new prices:

      size, new apple price, street price
      512, 75, 50
      1gb, 325, 85

      So looking at the 512Mb price, for the extra $25 it's probably worth the convience of having it preinstalled.

      But then look at the 1Gb price, for only $10 more than the apple 512mb price you could have 1Gb, AND a spare PC2700 256Mb to stick on some other machine.

    10. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I've read that some people actually intend to use the external HD as a boot drive and the internal drive for storage/scratch disk. FW enclosures and HDs are so cheap these days that, unless one is pressed for space, it makes more sense to go that route.

    11. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by Refrag · · Score: 1

      Why would you bother getting Apple Care on a computer as cheap as the Mac Mini?

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    12. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by netringer · · Score: 1
      IMO, the built-in Bluetooth ain't worth it. I've got a usb bt dongle from Linksys
      It's worth it if you don't want ANY device hanging off the box which is the case particulary with the GF and her planned new iMac. It'll be with a Bluetooth wireless keyboard and mouse so there are no cables simply for the cleanliness aspect.
      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    13. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

      AMEN!!!!!!

      Seriously, I am tired of people complaining about their Dell computers being broken and virus-ridden. And then I say, my Apple doesn't have those problems and they really can't comprehend.

      I can't get over the fact that 98% of you put of with Windows.

    14. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by Nailer · · Score: 1

      Put that in contrast with the Windows or Linux experience, how much time do you need to spend installing and customizing those boxes before they are actually useable?

      Personally, the ability to tweak my system to work exactly the way I want, more than other other OS you mentioned, is why I use Linux. Yes, I know others don't like customizing their system and just want it to work. They're not geeks and don't read trashy websites like this one.

      That said, I'm buying a mini, and will give OSX a try.

    15. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by matastas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, probably. Thing is, this is a common syndrome with any other PC manufacturer. Upgrades on a line-item basis are dirt cheap; on the aggregate, they add up to some real money. So when a customer upgrades a few things and realizes they doubled the price of their $599 (Dell, Gateway, Apple) computer, they get sticker shock and bail.

      Like many Slashdotters, I guide technology decisions for a lot of friends/family, and one of the main complaints I've heard consistantly about Apple is the pricing. Hell, I've ranted than the only reason I don't own one is the pricetage. The $499/$599 pricetag gets people in the door, and dropping the upgrade price may lower the sticker-shock on the backend and help them complete more sales.

    16. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      I was looking at Crucial, where a 512mb stick runs you $79.

    17. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Where can you get a 1 GB stick of PC2700 RAM with a lifetime warranty from a reputable vendor that's not gouging you on shipping? The lowest price I've seen is $158 on a stick that should work, but might not. Cheapest on a stick that is specifically advertised to work is $170.

      Pretty much the same deal on the 512 stick, but the margins aren't as wide. Probably compatible: $67. Advertised as compatible: $69.

      My source is DealRam. As they haven't added the Mini to their systems drop down list, I looked at prices for the eMac.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    18. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by coffeebucket · · Score: 1

      "[...] what counts is how well the computer allows you to do what you want to do."

      Although my machine is used for "productive" purposes, I also want to be able to play games.

      I know that a number of high profile titles have already been released for OS X and that more are in progress. But that number pales in comparison to the quantity of titles available for Windows. Don't get me wrong; I'm no Windows advocate, but this is how I see the market today.

      No matter how great OS X is at being an operating system, it's only as good as the software available for it. True, this also applies to many open source *NIX OSes but, with the exception of a few of the Linux distros, they're not trying to paint themselves as a complete desktop alternative to Microsoft's beast.

      I'm not saying this is entirely Apple's fault, but surely there are things they can do to make game development for their platform more conducive to developers. No doubt this has been discussed at length before, but the more developers Apple can get on board, the more likely they are to capture this segment of the market.

    19. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      Er, you know what? This doesn't help. The idea is getting people to switch, my friend, not taking a switch to people's asses.

      Characterizing different opinions as "bitching" and "whining," or denigrating people as "fry boy" because you think they can't afford what you can, just make you sound mean and petty.

      Don't fool yourself: you're giving Apple products a bad name. Nobody there wants the product line to be associated with invidious comparisons. In fact, that's why Apple lowered the price. To attract "fry boys."

    20. Re:The price needs to be in the impluse buy range by netringer · · Score: 1

      One correction: I went back and tried configuring a Mac mini again. It comes to $799 list for the wireless step up one without AppleCare and keyboard/mouse. The price hasn't dropped as far as I can tell. AppleCare is $149 more. I would pass on that as per my usual practice with extended service scams.

      BTW, I'm not trashing Macs. Like I said I recommended the GF get a $2000 iMac G5. I have turned two different friends onto buying iBooks.

      I didn't expect that telling about my actual experience above makes me an Apple basher merely because I said I don't have one yet* and I didn't buy a mini. The real reason is I just built a an AMD 64 screamer so I'm not in the market for another toy yet.

      I think the iMac is a great value and I'll be getting a G5 PowerBook in spite of your *kind* words. You won't mind if I say that whether you think that's OK doesn't weigh on my decision, right?

      * = not quite true. When I spent many hours rescueing my neighbor from Windows spyware hell and recommended HE get an iMac, he gave me his old Mac LC. I haven't messed with it yet. I think I'll put BSD on it.

      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
  45. Capturing Ipod Converts? by AdolChristin · · Score: 0

    Is this lower cost Apple revolution an attempt to capture a younger market segment that has been turned on to Apple by the Ipod? I'd like to see numbers that show just how many people have been converted because of the Ipod. I'd bet they were similar to the numbers that show people converting to *nix because of Firefox (i.e. not that many...) I wonder if Apple can survive at the margins?

    --
    #include "forums.h"
    int main() {while (bollox) postcount++;}
  46. Maybe they realized that 256MB sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, none of the demo machines I've seen have less than 512MB. What were they thinking?

  47. Not likely... by stienman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps Apple actually listened to people complaining about overpriced upgrades.

    Or they misjudged market demand for upgraded units and have warehouses full of units that aren't selling while the bottom end is oversold.

    -Adam

  48. Ordered mine a week ago by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    and it won't ship until Feb 17th, or so says the website. What I want to know is which SuperDrive will I get? I ordered the 4x. Should I cancel and them re-order to get the 8x?

    1. Re:Ordered mine a week ago by smcavoy · · Score: 1

      why the hell would you ask everyone on slashdot? why not SPEAK TO APPLE?

    2. Re:Ordered mine a week ago by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I have an email in to support, I haven't received a reply.

    3. Re:Ordered mine a week ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think everyone is getting an 8x superdrive, 8x is the read speed mind you, still burns at 4x.

  49. Maybe it's just supply and demand. by MishaGray · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could be that the pre-orders for the Mini mac are exceeding expectations.

    That means that Apple can put more parts in the pipeline, and get better prices.

    It may also be that Apple is starting to look at the mini-Mac as a market grown opportunity, more than a cash opportunity. It may make more sense to drop the prices closer to cost, if it means selling more boxes.

    1. Re:Maybe it's just supply and demand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like iPod prices dropped when the demand for them were great? Oh, wait.. They didn't...

      You cut prices across the board if the services aren't selling. Simplest explanation.

  50. Interesting how fast wrong info spreads unchecked by Smack · · Score: 1

    And how badly corrections spread when everyone is just copy-and-pasting the "news".

  51. iMac Mini is a hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple really outdid themselves this time - they've build a whole Macintosh into a 6.5" square case that's just 2" high. And it looks stylish. And it's just $499.

    Honestly, I wasn't expecting anything this stylish in an entry-level headless Mac. I can hardly comprehend how they managed to squeeze a Combo drive, a hard drive, a motherboard, and even a tiny speaker into such a compact space. The Mac mini is a lot smaller than those "zero footprint" SCSI drives we used back in the Mac Plus era. Those generally measured 9.6" wide, over 10" deep, and at least 3" high.

    What Apple has really invented here is the hand-holdable, transportable desktop computer. It weighs less than three pounds (plus the external power supply), works with any USB mouse or keyboard, and connects to any DVI or VGA display. With a $19 adapter, you can even connect it to most modern TVs using S-video.

    In terms of hardware specs, the Mac mini is pretty much an eMac without a display or stereo speakers. It has either a 1.25 GHz or 1.42 GHz G4 processor, a 40 GB or 80 GB hard drive, and normally ships with a Combo drive. (For the first time in Apple history, the SuperDrive option cost only $100 more.)

    There's room for Bluetooth and AirPort Express, just like on the eMac. But there are a few less ports - just one FireWire 400 port and two USB 2.0 ones.

    Mac miniApple kept the power supply outside of the computer, which keeps the size, weight, and heat down. And they made the mouse and keyboard optional, which helped keep the retail price down.

    From a geek's standpoint, built-in video, no extra hard drive bays, and no expansion slots will be disappointing. From a user's standpoint, that will hardly matter. Most computer users never upgrade their video cards, the Mac mini works with external FireWire and USB 2.0 hard drives, and about the only reason you'd want an expansion slot would be to add a TV tuner. That can also be done with USB or FireWire.

    All the pieces are in place, and in addition to the hardware, the Mac mini buyer will get the $79 iLife '05 bundle, Apple's new $79 iWork package, Quicken 2005, and a few extra goodies - even a 30 day trial version of Microsoft Office.

    The design is nothing less than we should have expected from Apple, and the price point is going to tempt a lot of iPod owners and Windows users who are sick to death of viruses and spyware and adware to consider a Mac.

    If they don't have all that, they're going to get Delled. $58 for Apple's mouse and keyboard. $189 for a 17" Mitsubishi monitor. Maybe $29 for an inexpensive set of speakers. Suddenly it's not a whole lot less than the $799 eMac.

    On the other hand, it's much more portable than the eMac. You could easily throw the Mac mini in a briefcase or duffle bag or large purse to transport it between home and work or school.

    It's also very flexible. You can use it to watch DVDs on any TV with S-video input. And you can probably use it to play games on those TVs as well. Or surf the Web.

    The $499 price point is going to get a lot of attention, especially since that doesn't assume any mail-in rebates. It's an out-the-door price, and the Mac mini offers a lot for the money.

    The $599 Mac mini runs at 1.42 GHz, a 13% speed boost over the entry-level model, and it comes with an 80 GB hard drive. Is that worth a 20% price premium? Just barely. The speed isn't going to make a big difference, but that 40 GB hard drive can fill up pretty quickly if you work with video.

    The other question is whether you can replace the stock 2.5" hard drive with a higher capacity, faster drive without worrying about heat problems. If that is possible, I'd buy my Mac mini with the 40 GB drive and replace it with something big and fast for US$80-100. (Apple charges $50 to put an 80 GB drive in the Mac mini, and it's probably not a 7200 rpm drive. However, there's no option to buy the 1.42 GHz mini with a 40 GB drive.)

    It's also nice that Apple doesn't include their keyboard and mouse, becaus

    1. Re:iMac Mini is a hit by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Most of your Astroturfing I'll ignore, however, I've noticed this sort of thing gets said a lot:

      I can hardly comprehend how they managed to squeeze a Combo drive, a hard drive, a motherboard, and even a tiny speaker into such a compact space.

      Giving they (along with numerous PC makers) have been "squeezing" those components into machines that big for several years now, I'm not sure why you find it so difficult to comprehend.

      You do realise a Mini is almost exactly the same volume as a 12" iBook (or Powerbook), right ?

      Hardware wise, there's nothing particularly exciting or interesting about the Mini at all.

  52. idiot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    critical dyslexia? (Score:1)
    by enlcd (853494) on Wednesday January 26, @10:57AM (#11480642)

    the price of an upgrade from a 40 GB hard drive to an 80 GB hard drive has been reduced to $50 from $90

  53. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by SkipRosebaugh · · Score: 1

    Except that, if you actually click on your link, and look at the detail page for apple.com, it doesn't actually show any advertisements that Apple would plausibly run. Instead, it shows things like Time-Life elvis books and Netflix subscriptions. I think your evidence may be a little wanting.

  54. and Europe ? by antani · · Score: 0


    What about Europe ? we have to pay MORE than americans for such a 'cheap' computer ?
    Apple users are complaining about too much expensive upgrades, but what about those strange marketing under-the-499-whathever which increases Apple base prices for europeans... ?

    I think mr.Jobs knows that his 'discount' over the upgrades are all payed by us europeans

    i think i'll buy a mac mini next year, after the mac-micro release (that's the logical evolution, smaller smaller and much more smaller) and a obvious price rip-off

    .

    1. Re:and Europe ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VAT and higher import tariffs, plus minor roundup to the next x9.00 price point explain most aspects.

    2. Re:and Europe ? by antani · · Score: 0



      Apple produces all its stuff in USA ? i think not

      i think different!

    3. Re:and Europe ? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Apple used to manufacture in Cork, Ireland. Not sure if it's still a manufacturing facility, but they are still there -- my friend is the manager of telesales for Europe.

  55. I called Apple and this is what they said.... by jerk · · Score: 5, Informative

    I called yesterday after work and they handled it very professionally...I didn't even have to get upset. They credited me the $31.20 difference for the Airport/BT combo and said that no mini's actually shipped with the 4x Superdrives...they just corrected the description on the webpage. I'm not able to verify this since I'm away on business for the week, but I'll take his word for it for the time being. Can anyone with a mini verify the speed of the Superdrive?

    This is part of the reason people love Apple so much, they really do take care of their customers.

    1. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that they probably said "no minis", as opposed to no mini's, since an apostrophe denotes ownership and not the plural form of a noun.

    2. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by CapnRob · · Score: 1

      Okay, they're not charging that much now. They're charging $350. Can we expect you to be ordering one today, then?

    3. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Checked the price of name-brand 1GB DDR SODIMMs lately? $350 isn't that bad a price.

    4. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by CapnRob · · Score: 1

      Dang it, my brain and my fingers didn't talk. They're charging $325, not $350.

    5. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by Jonathan_S · · Score: 4, Informative
      Checked the price of name-brand 1GB DDR SODIMMs lately? $350 isn't that bad a price.
      Except that the Mac mini doesn't use a SODIMM (aka laptop memory). It uses a standard DDR DIMM.

      Using the same site, and actually looking up the Mac mini using Crucial's system selector, a 1GB DIMM for it costs $226.99.

      Now that $350 Apple charged doesn't look so good.
    6. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Have you checked the right page for Mini-compatible modules?

      They use PC2700 modules; $325 is still an almost-50% markup from retail for other vendors, and you can be sure it costs apple far less than Crucial will be selling it to you for, nevermind their savings in not including the standard 256 MB module.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    7. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by frankie · · Score: 1

      Except that the Mini uses normal DDR SDRAM. Even if you ignore generics, you can get 1GB of Kingston or Crucial for about $200.

      Apple's upgrade is a 62% markup, and that doesn't even count the loss of the original 256MB chip (which you could sell for a few bucks or use in another system). Still not worth the price.

    8. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I skipped the SuperDrive on mine since my firewire external is an 8x Pioneer already.

      Had the website been accurate they would have had an extra hundred bucks out of me.

      Somebody screwed up - the decision to use 8x wasn't made after January 12th.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by dragonman97 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Mac Mini takes PC2700 RAM. PC3200 will /work/ but it will drop to PC2700's speed. I just ordered my Mac Mini, and got it with 512 MB - at academic pricing, the difference between factory shipped and DIY just isn't worth it. I was looking at prices with a guy at the Apple store, and he looked it up on Pricewatch, and found 512 for ~55 - I got mine for $67. Maybe shipping wouldn't be $12, but the time and effort, and lack of Apple warranty makes up for it. Now, OTOH, he found 1 GB of RAM going for ~79+ -- that's one hell of a difference from Apple's ripoff pricing. All the Apple guys there figure the aftermarket method is much more economical - I really like the people there - they're not scumbags like some/many of the red shirts @ places like CompScrewSA.

    10. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by badmammajamma · · Score: 0, Redundant

      lol...you mac-nazi moderators can all go fuck yourselves. I get marked as a troll just because I don't praise the almighty Apple everytime the grace us with one of their new super-spectacular products.

      Please explain the troll factor of the following:

      1) I said they charge too much.
      This is a very common complaint of Apple. It's valid and not trolling.

      2) I explain that I don't understand the fandom considering what they charge their customers.
      This really just builds on point #1. I could have also thrown in their closed system attitude and how it flies in the face of competition, etc.

      3) I compared their fame to Elvis.
      At first I can see how this might be trollish. However, if you bother to follow Apple news, you will find it's a fair comparison. People wait with baited breath for their latest offerings and weep with glee when they are released. I can provide quotes if necessary.

      Complaining about something or questioning something isn't trolling. Get a fucking clue about moderating before you do it or just don't bother spending your points. I don't see people complaining about Windows or Microsoft (which happens pretty much daily on /.) being marked as trolls.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    11. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by chiph · · Score: 1

      I had mine open this morning when I upgraded my RAM. The DVD-R/RW is a Matshita UJ-835F, which is 8x read speed.

      Note that I had to use a pocketknife to get the putty knife started (I guess I bought a dull putty knife?). I was very surprised to see that the case truly is aluminum, and not just painted plastic. You get what you pay for, sometimes!

      Chip H.

    12. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Now that $350 Apple charged doesn't look so good.

      To you. I'm a hardcore geek and built my last 5 systems, but the $125 premium for "I don't have to mess with it" and "if Apple breaks it during the upgrade, then that's their problem" is looking increasingly attractive.

      Maybe it's because I'm married and I know that if I bought a Mac Mini and then managed to screw up the case while trying to get it open, then I'd still be hearing about it 20 years from now. $125 is cheap insurance against that in my book.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    13. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whining about what you consider "unfair" moderation, in fact caring about your karma at all, is pretty damn sad. I think you should go join the kind of forums where every post contains at least one OMG and a half dozen "!!!!1!!111" strings - you'll fit in better.

      Not that I don't agree with you about the quality of moderation here, but nobody gives a fuck about your precious karma or your damaged dignity OK? Meta-moderation will happen. In the meantime, deal with it.

      Free clue for you: "bated breath" is correct, not "baited breath". See http ://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary& va=bated&x=20&y=16
      Yes, those illiterate fucks at dictionary.com think that its meaning is somehow related to a worm on a hook, but this just tells you how useless that ad-farm truly is.

    14. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by jerk · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what thread of yours got modded troll, because I certainly don't see it above, but anyways I want to respond to a couple of your points.

      They charge too much...
      I can see how a lot of people could feel this way, but they're truly uninformed. If you've ever built your own PC, you know that quality components cost more. IE: ECS motherboard vs Asus, Vdata vs Crucial, or Archtek vs 3Com, etc. Apple use high quality components and often include things budget PC's don't come with (firewire, gigabit ethernet, etc), whether you use them or not is up to you. The point is that they come with this stuff as a minimum config.

      I don't understand the fandom...
      If you haven't used an Apple product or had the pleasure of dealing with Apple Support, then I can understand why you don't get it. They make great products and their support is excellent, especially when compared to most PC manufacturers.

      People wait with baited breath for their latest offerings and weep with glee when they are released...
      This goes hand-in-hand with what I said above. Apple really do make fantastic products. People that have experienced these fantastic products can't wait to see what Apple has done with their next product because they have such a great track record of outdoing themselves.

      You don't have to like it, but I'm trying to get you to at least understand it. If Apple made shitty products you might have a point, but they don't. They may be more expensive, but you know the old saying: "You get what you pay for."

      The same can be said for the PC industry. I can buy a Dell for $500. I can also make a PC using higher quality parts that may cost a bit more, have the peace of mind that the components are less likely to fail, and if they happen to fail, the company that I bought them from will still be in business to replace them.

    15. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      "Not that I don't agree with you about the quality of moderation here, but nobody gives a fuck about your precious karma or your damaged dignity OK?"

      If I was concerned about my karma, I would have posted anonymously...like you did.

      "Free clue for you: "bated breath" is correct, not "baited breath". See http ://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary& va=bated&x=20&y=16"

      Thanks for the tip.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    16. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by ToddML · · Score: 1

      Just a quick note, in the 22MB mac mini servicing PDF that has come out, they note that the putty knife apple is distributing is modified in that the edge is beveled. They suggest that anyone using a 3rd party putty knife file one side of the knife with 150 grit sandpaper to create a beveled edge that more easily fits in the gap between the housings.

    17. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by cosmic_0x526179 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Keep in mind that for $350 you are getting one 1GB DIMM (with a one year warranty from Apple).

      For $226.99 you are getting two DIMMs, one 256MB DIMM (with an Apple one year warranty) and one 1GB DIMM (with whatever warranty Crucial supplies)... not to mention the fun and games required to remove one and replace the other.

      The latter sounds to me like the better deal.

      --
      This msg is brought to you by the letter 'W'.. for Worthless Wuss
    18. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I think you, your brain, and your fingers need family counseling. Possibly an intervention. =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    19. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think you're being unfair to all the Total Morons Who Aren't Smart Enough To Be Scumbags that work at CompUSA. I purchase from CompUSA because of their hiring practices. If half their employees weren't victims of Down's Syndrome, I'd probably shop elsewhere.

    20. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's because I'm married and I know that if I bought a Mac Mini and then managed to screw up the case while trying to get it open, then I'd still be hearing about it 20 years from now. $125 is cheap insurance against that in my book.

      I know you're making a serious point, but reading that and hearing in my mind the years of bitter experience that led to this wisdom totally cracked me up.

    21. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they charge more cuz they take a stock mini open it up and install the RAM check if everything is ok pack it nicely in the box again... so basically you are paying for that they charge for the time too! I believe every Company does this?

    22. Re:I called Apple and this is what they said.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?Pr oductCode=86038

      A single 1 GB ECC Registered DIMM with lifetime warranty.

  56. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

    Umm, did you even go to that link for the spyware/adaware? seriously, look at what the links point to, it is NOT apple.com

    here

    http://asp-cyber.law.harvard.edu/gator-sites/tes t. asp?host=apple.com

    Ohh and about the 19 year old, they aren't suing him for finding out about the $500 computer, they are suing him so that he reveals who his contacts at apple are who gave him the information on the mac mini so that Apple can scold its own employees.

  57. Wonder how this affects... by IdJit · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...my free mini? ;-)

  58. How do you know the margin is thin? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    An eMac is $800 with a 17" CRT built in.

    A Mac mini has no monitor, or keyboard or mouse and only costs $500 for roughly the same hardware. The pacakging is also a lot smaller and simpler.

    Apple could still be making decent margins off this I think. And as others have noted if there are many accessory sales margins are even better.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:How do you know the margin is thin? by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      generally, apple's consumer products need a gimmick. Apple would never release a desktop computer that was a regular sized tower whose only gimmick was the low price.

      This machine is tiny. You ever try to build a mini Pentium4 machine? Go to mini-itx.com... they have a mini-itx P4 board for 180$. Throw in a decent processor (about another 80$ from newegg), RAM (90$), small PSU (70$), slotload CDRW/DVD+/-RW drive (190$), and Harddrive ($100), and yer already up over 700$ and that doesn't even include a spiffy case or other miscellanious periphery...

      just remember, a lot of the cost of the new mini is coming from the size (or lack thereof).

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
  59. Wow, Apple is finally getting people to switch!!! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    How else could you explain the fact that people are actually "complaining about overpriced upgrades." Any serious Mac-Head would never complain about high prices, they consider it a rite of passage to get an "insanely" great product.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  60. Re:Pist Frost by jmcmunn · · Score: 1

    Why not get a free one!

    http://www.freeminimacs.com/?r=14101826

  61. RAM Still cheaper at Crucial by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    You can still get a gig of ram for these (PC2700, DDR333) for $226 (unbuffered non-ecc) or $299 (registered ecc) from Crucial. Given the price and comparing with their usual upgrade markups, I'm guessing the Apple upgrade is the former, not the latter. Still, compared to the usual markup, this is pretty good.

    1. Re:RAM Still cheaper at Crucial by Kevinv · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but Apple installs for you. That's probably worth the extra $100 to many people. For me I'll install my own when my mini arrives.

      Oh, and don't buy registered ECC, Mac mini won't support it. It needs to be unbuffered and unregistered memory for the Mac mini. You can use PC 3200 (DDR 400) but it runs at the slower speed.

    2. Re:RAM Still cheaper at Crucial by bonch · · Score: 1

      The shipped RAM of the mini uses no registered memory. I don't know the effects of using registered memory, but I imagine random kernel panics. Apple's spec page for the mini is very clear about the specs of the RAM.

    3. Re:RAM Still cheaper at Crucial by kakos · · Score: 1

      If your mobo doesn't support registered memory, it just won't use the register. As far as I know, putting registered memory won't do anything for or against you.

  62. Perhaps a typo by sokoban · · Score: 2, Informative

    For tboth configs of the mac mini in the US apple store, the prices of the airport card and BT card are: BT $50, Airport $79, combo $99.
    On the UK store for the 1.2ghz the prices are: BT 35.00 UKP, AP 49.00 UKP, and combo 152.88 UKP.
    However, the prices for the upgrades on the 1.4 ghz are: BT 35.00 UKP, AP 49.00 UKP, and combo 69.99 UKP.
    I think there is a possible typo on the store or something. the 152 UKP price would seem reasonable for the combo BT/APExtreme and an AP Express bundled in, but not for the combo card itself.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:Perhaps a typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've just done the UKP-USD conversion the wrong way round.......should have the combo at UKP54 (USD99 / 1.82 [current xchnage rate])....we wish....!

  63. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ok, the kid is a dumb ass for posting the news. would it kill him to wait for 2 minutes after Steve jobs shows it? lack of self restraint does not mean he is right.

    if I was apple, I sure as hell would be pissed and try to get him to tell me who leaked the information. there's nothing wrong with that, because the employee that leaked it is under contract and cannot leak "sensitive information" without permission.

  64. Tortious interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter how young you are if you're over 18, you're liable for tortious interference if you induce someone else to break a contract.

    This is *perfectly normal.* Media people deal with this *all the time.* It's often considered a badge of honour to have had a criminal prosecution over protecting your source, but is considered scandalous to have opened your company to a civil suit for anything less than a really important cause. A civil suit costs your company money, a criminal prosecution just costs the reporter's time.

    Since the young man in question owns ThinkSecret himself, he may be liable, and the risk is his. If he hasn't broken the law, he'll get off, but apple suspects he has.

    As for the spyware networks.... Adobe's on that list too. It isn't possible for me to boycott Adobe. Sometimes an evil deed is so common among companies you can't boycott anymore without being a consumer at all. And if you're not a consumer, nobody gives a flying fuck.

    I'd be really startled if you've managed to avoid every company on that list. AT&T and Verizon are both on there. I don't know what other phone companies you have down in the states, but that seriously limits your choices.

  65. New Apple Business: Workstations by reporter · · Score: 1
    Okay. I am just dreaming, but doubtless, Apple could build an awesome workstation subsidiary out of its current phalanx of Macintoshes. Apple just needs to add the ECC memory that normally are installed in the x86 workstations.

    These low-end MacMinis with ECC memory would be great lowend workstations. The PowerMac G5 would be great highend workstations.

    Maybe, I am waxing "intellectual", but the fact that the x86 with its ugly instruction set and gross addressing modes has dominated the market really disappoints me. Why can't the better (from an engineering point of view) instruction set architecture (i.e. PowerPC) win in the desktop market?

    1. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by realdpk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Why can't the better (from an engineering point of view) instruction set architecture (i.e. PowerPC) win in the desktop market?"

      Because the desktop market would not be best served by having Apple take the lead. Half of everything Apple does would be considered "anticompetitive" if they were in Microsoft's position. And talk about vendor lock-in! Apple doesn't even allow clones any more.

      Apple would need to make a *lot* of changes to become dominant, and would need to take some big chances.

    2. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      And talk about vendor lock-in! Apple doesn't even allow clones any more.

      Neither does Microsoft. If they can can do anything to stop a clone, they will. (Lindows).

      IBM did nothing to stop clones of their original PC design of course, and look what happened to their PC business. They quickly learned their lesson on the undesirability of clones, hence the PS/2. But it was too late to save their PC business.

    3. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      "Maybe, I am waxing "intellectual", but the fact that the x86 with its ugly instruction set and gross addressing modes has dominated the market really disappoints me."

      Partly because you're wrong, and partly because it doesn't matter.

      To elaborate:

      I will concede that the x86 instruction set is not pretty, but I would argue that it doesn't matter. Specifically, it only matters a little bit to people that program in assembly, and it doesn't matter at all to people that use compilers (the vast majority). As transistor counts have gone up, the added difficulty of supporting x86 has dropped to less than 5% of the transistors on the chip, probably less than that now that everyone has giant caches. Also, x86 binaries tend to be smaller (as x86 doesn't have to use fixed size opcodes) which saves a not-insignificant amount of cache and memory bandwidth.

      The "gross addressing modes" are only relevant in real mode. In 32-bit protected mode or 64-bit mode, the address space is flat just like PowerPC. None of the popular OSes being distributed for x86 uses real mode (*BSD, Linux, Windows 2000 and later). Sure, the computer spends a few seconds in real mode after you turn it on and before the OS loads... but who cares?

      "Why can't the better (from an engineering point of view) instruction set architecture (i.e. PowerPC) win in the desktop market?"

      Because there's no significant benefit.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    4. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The PowerMac G5 would be great highend workstations.


      I'm not so sure IBM would let that happen. If Apple were to seriously rival IBM's POWER systems, I think IBM might develop some "manufacuring problems" with respect to any chips destined to Apple.. or maybe just instruct them (Apple) to "stop".

      This isn't the Fujitsu/Sun/SPARC relationship where Fujitsu doesn't have to take Sun's shit, this is "I'm the only fucker in town who can reliably manufacture your CPUs, and also happen to be pretty damned good at designing them".

      Don't get me wrong, I like Apple and at the next product refresh I'm going to buy a dual G5 tower.. but screwing with IBM is like smacking Darth Vader's bare ass with a ping pong paddle: you'll get a whole lot of unhealthy attention coming your way.
    5. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Neither does Microsoft. If they can can do anything to stop a clone, they will. (Lindows).

      Not really comparable. Apple makes computer hardware, Microsoft doesn't (except mice/keyboard type things).

      Microsoft hasn't stopped Linux (of course, they try to do so via marketing, but that's inevitable) or Apple software.

      IBM did nothing to stop clones of their original PC design of course, and look what happened to their PC business.

      IBM is doing pretty well. If Apple could expand into the markets IBM is in, I would think their shareholders would be pretty happy.

    6. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by hawk · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Apple doesn't even allow clones any more.

      No, there just haven't been any for several years.

      Apple did *not* refuse to renew the cloning licenses. They *did* insist on larger fees on upper end machines, and the cloners refused.

      The more expensive machines with fatter margins for apple had always paid the bulk of the R&D costs. The cloners weren't paying any of that under the old deal.

      hawk

    7. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by BasilBrush · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Not really comparable.

      That's my point. Anyone who thinks Apple suffered from a no clones policy doesn't realise it's not comparable. Or they don't realise that the company that was cloned (IBM) suffered for it. Or they don't realise that Apple tried clones and the idea failed. Usually all three.

      IBM is doing pretty well.

      I said the IBM PC business. In case you haven't been following the news, it was making heavy losses and was sold off to a Chinese company.

    8. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to popular belief, Apple does not own PowerPC. Regardless of whether or not it would be better to have Apple in Microsoft's position, the PowerPC architecture would be unreservedly better than the x86 architecture.

    9. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't the better (from an engineering point of view) instruction set architecture (i.e. PowerPC) win in the desktop market?

      That's something that doesn't matter at all, to almost anybody.

      Go take a survey, and find out how many people would consider "instruction set architecture" an important criterion for purchasing their next computer. Ask geeks, even: unless you're writing device drivers or something like that, ISA simply doesn't matter.

      I've been running a Linux box for years, and the only way it's mattered is that I have to pick "x86" from the menu instead of "PPC" or something else. (Heck, my next machine may be a Mac, even if I need another Linux box.)

      You may as well ask why people aren't rushing out to buy the car with the best-designed power steering pump. Sure, it may be well designed, but who knows, much less cares?

    10. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the clone makers told Steve to "pound sand", as he put it in some interview.

      Basically Apple was honoring it's agreements, but made it clear that they weren't going to license future operating systems (OS X, maybe OS 9) under those same agreements. This effectively killed cloning, but but a continuation of cloning would have effectively killed Apple, which would have killed the clones anyway.

      I think this is the interview. It's on the Steve Jobs Info site. If that's not the right interview, then it's another on the movies page. I just saw it the other day.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    11. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by hawk · · Score: 1

      That was pretty much it, yes.

      The clones were all made with apple-designed motherboards (or was there one that wasn't) running hte Apple OS. The cloners wanted apple to do all the R&D whiel they continued to pay minimal royalties.

    12. Re:New Apple Business: Workstations by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1
      Maybe, I am waxing "intellectual", but the fact that the x86 with its ugly instruction set and gross addressing modes has dominated the market really disappoints me. Why can't the better (from an engineering point of view) instruction set architecture (i.e. PowerPC) win in the desktop market?

      Consider it this way: The 8088 was a good decision for the IBM PC. It had the CISC mentality when the FSB was the same speed as the on chip clock. With 0 and later 1 level of metal, it had limited power, but it worked "well enough". Applications came out for this cheap computer, and it thrived. Since you discuss the "engineering point of view", I'll assume you know what happened in the following years.

      1990. x86 was getting long in the tooth. 386 was a major thing, and 486 had some nice speed improvements, but little additional functionality. 68k was running out of gas, and everybody else's CISC was just clamoring for some freedom. This was the turning point, when anybody could have taken the lead. Intel, as we all know, wrapped a translator around a RISC core and made the HUGE (monstrous in size and power) 66MHz Pentium (those that failed speed sorting were sold at 60MHz). Everybody else -- Alpha, PowerPC, Sparc, PA-RISC and even ARM to a lesser degree -- had an opportunity, but Intel kept compatibility. Since then, Intel has been able to make slight improvements to the translator, add a few whistles (MMX, MMX2, SSE, SSE2) and rice out the RISC core to keep up. Today, compilers are a known constant. There may be some x86 hand tuning to do, but for the most part the basic x86 instruction set has done everything there is to do -- so Intel is free to hack up their translator and make the RISC core as fast as they can.

      HP has all but put the last nail in the coffins for PA-RISC and Alpha, Fuji is starting to do something real with Sparc (forget Sun, they stopped really trying on the processor front 5 years ago). PowerPC is struggling with a lack of application support for either AIX or a low end home system. The MiniMac has a chance to increase PowerPC volumes, which may be the crowbar to increase application support on the consumer front.

      The original AIM idea was that Motorola and Apple would continue what they had done with the Mac and IBM was going to take over the Intel world with PowerPC running PCs running OS/2 (later WinNT). Turns out, IBM isn't priced to take the cheap consumers and isn't glitzy enough to take the consumers with money to burn.

  66. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by technos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do you not read well, or are you a troll?

    Go read that first link you supplied us. They are *targetted* by the bastards at Gator, who add their own ads to apple.com pages. It is the reverse which is scorn-worthy.

    Now go read your second link, which gives no real information at all. Go to ThinkSecret, read the full blurbs elsewhere on powerpage.org.

    Now what do you think Apple is trying to accomplish?

    Jobs is sick and tired of leaking assholes in R&D stealing all his fire every year by providing specifications to "journalists". He's finally gotten pissed off enough about it that Apple is now going to make damn sure they find who did it, and then fire their asses. If the press and your competitors were getting advance warning of your unreleased products, complete with specs and price, you'd be pissed too.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  67. Just basic economics by TheMediaWrangler · · Score: 1

    Commodity market realities are settling in at Apple. Now that Apple is entering the commodity market, the demand curve for upgrades and services has actually shifted to the left. This is largely because their new customers aren't factoring the value of professional installation service into their decision. Apple is used to dealing with a hyper-loyal, price-insensitive customer base that is happy to pay more for perceived value of Apple services. This is not true of switchers whose last computer was a Compaq or a Dell.

    --
    People should not fear what they do not understand; people should fear because they do not understand.
  68. Re:Pist Frost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The site does not work with Mozilla.

  69. Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by bonch · · Score: 5, Informative

    On the Apple forums, several people have described random kernel panics and general operating unpleasantness after going with cheap RAM.

    The only place I would get Mac RAM from would be Crucial.com, and they're more or less the price of the Apple RAM, though the 1GB is a hundred less. Crucial is a division of Micron and thoroughly tests their RAM.

    The problem is that some people report issues with using PC2700 RAM in the mini, some report overheating (you need quality RAM because of that cramped airflow in the casing), and so on.

    Make sure you people manually upgrading your minis get high-quality RAM that is up to spec!

    1. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I admin Macs for a school. datamem.com and macsales.com memory works just fine. We buy all of our memory from them.

    2. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Nastard · · Score: 1

      Also, some folks are suggesting using PC3200 instead of PC2700. Somthing to do with the timing being slightly off. Naturally, because PC3200 is backwards-compatible, this will work just fine.

      It may seem like a waste, but it's noot much more money, and the peace of mind is worth it.

    3. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by cyngus · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, the days are past when any old RAM from anyone was okay to use. RAM margins are too thin and there's a lot of junk out there. However, getting just about any name brand RAM (Micron, Viking, Crucial, Corsair, Kingmax, and some others) you are pretty much safe. I've put a lot of RAM in a lot of Macs and never had a problem with the above listed brands in anything from an iMac to the newest G5's.

      The kernel panics are because Apple has, as usual, decided to pick quality over junk. They've built Macs not to deal with bad memory that some computer would accept and in the end really screw you over when it corrupts your data.

    4. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On the Apple forums, several people have described random kernel panics and general operating unpleasantness after going with cheap RAM.

      If that happens, then your RAM is defective. Assuming you bought memory with a lifetime warranty (can you even find memory that doesn't have one?), then get it replaced.

      The only place I would get Mac RAM from would be Crucial.com, and they're more or less the price of the Apple RAM, though the 1GB is a hundred less. Crucial is a division of Micron and thoroughly tests their RAM.

      I'll never buy from Crucial, and here's why. I was shopping for a memory upgrade for my PowerBook when I came across this product on their site:

      http://www.crucial.com/store/MPartspecs.Asp?mtbpoi d=5DC2B0BFA5CA7304

      It's a 1GB memory module for my model of PowerBook. It's $480. I thought this price was a little high, but Crucial is generally kind of expensive. Then I found this page:

      http://www.crucial.com/store/PartSpecs.asp?imodule =CT12864X335&cat=RAM

      It's an identical 1GB module, but for $340.

      What's going on here? I e-mailed them and asked what the difference was. Here are some quotes from their reply:

      Thank you for your e-mail. At Crucial we offer different "flavors" of the same memory, some that work in specific systems and some that work in general systems.

      If you placed the general use module into a PowerBook the system would become unstable and even lock up at sporadic times.

      Part number CT12864X335 is not compatible.

      I'm not sure what's going on here. It's obvious that this e-mail is at extreme odds with the truth. One explanation is that they've caught on to the idea that Mac owners have more money, and they decided to cash in. Another explanation is that their customer support is incompetent. Either way, I see no reason to buy from them and every reason to avoid them.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    5. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by kitzilla · · Score: 1
      The same can be said for any Mac, really. I've been fortunate to have endured only two hardware issues with any of mu Mac boxes -- both of which ended up bering bad aftermarket RAM.

      I no longer buy anything but Crucial, and all is well. Cheap RAM is a bad idea in a Mac.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    6. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by slimak · · Score: 1

      For anyone RAM shopping for an Apple, check out OWC. They are not the cheapest, but I was able to get 2GB of Samsung memory for my PowerBook for $300 less than the upgrade from 512MG->2GB that Apple offered. It looks like the current pice is ~$290 per stick, down about $60 from 2 months ago.

    7. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm not sure what's going on here.

      I'm glad we cleared that up.

      It's obvious that this e-mail is at extreme odds with the truth. One explanation is that they've caught on to the idea that Mac owners have more money, and they decided to cash in. Another explanation is that their customer support is incompetent. Either way, I see no reason to buy from them and every reason to avoid them.

      I don't particularly like their explanation, but for every person who says that generic memory will work fine on modern Macs, there is someone who says that it won't. Judging the company's business practices on the response of one customer service lackey is questionable at best. If the modules are not exactly the same and the more expensive one has a greater chance of meeting their guarantee to customers, they are justified in selling it at a higher price. Unless you're one of those people who thinks that the physical item itself is the only item of value, promises have a monetary value and Crucial is taking advantage of it. As far as sending back cheap lifetime warranty memory if it doesn't work, I've been there, done that, and concluded that for me, it's not worth the effort. I take the chance of getting a bad stick from Crucial, but unless there's a major price differential I'm willing to pay a little bit more for greater assurance of making a purchase that will work with my hardware the first time. It's interesting that there are so many intelligent people here like yourself who value their time at about, oh, $0/hour. There's nothing wrong with that, as it's your loss, but please don't gloss over the annoyance of diagnosing bad RAM (especially if you are building a new machine) and sending it back/waiting for it to reach the vendor/waiting for the vendor to send a new stick/waiting for it to arrive when posting.

    8. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by pizero · · Score: 1

      Use Data Memory Systems.
      Our physics department has been using their memory for 8+ years and only had two bad chips. Both were replaced no questions asked with a simple phone call and we didn't even have to send the bad RAM back.

      Mac Mini 1Gb $199.00

    9. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually these days, with fab production moving towards pc3200 and away from pc2700, pc3200 is actually cheaper than 2700 is. Take a look at newegg or any other site selling same-brand, same-size ram and you'll see a difference in price. It's funky but true.

    10. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by bwy · · Score: 1

      I'll never buy from Crucial, and here's why. I was shopping for a memory upgrade for my PowerBook when I came across this product on their site:

      Crucial told someone else this:

      ---- The difference bewteen part CT372707 and CT6464X265 is the PCB revision. Part CT372707 = CT6464X256AP (note the AP)

      CT372707 is specifically for the Apple iBook (G4 1.2GHz) as standard parts CT6464X265 can sometimes be incompatible. This is due to a change in the JEDEC standards.

      Apples with standard memory will sometimes give the error "Bad memory" or "kernal panic". The memory however is not faulty. ---

    11. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Jason+Hood · · Score: 2, Informative

      The reason for this is that RAM that comes off the same assembly line is not necessarily as "good" as RAM that came off right before or after it. In making RAM or even CPUs there is always going to be a margin of error. micro components can fail, traces can be too thin, silicon can be impure... What happens is sometimes they try to produce 3200 RAM and the memory module cant run at the designed speed... but it can run at say 2700 with no problems.

      Just like that you have two different speed chips with the same model number because they are in fact the same type of chip. Its just rated at a different speed. This is exactly how processors are sorted and rated. This is just the tip of the iceberg though when talking about the quality of RAM remember finding RAM for early athlonXP boards? Yeah that was fun. I am not saying this was the case but it could have been.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    12. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by chiph · · Score: 1

      If you buy their ram based on the spec (timings, etc), you don't get the compatability guarantee like you do when you use their memory configurator.

      Chip H.

    13. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by aventius · · Score: 3, Funny
      I'll never buy Crucial ram for an Apple product again. I had such a fiasco. I got a stick of 512mb for my brand new powerbook g4 rev2 that they had verified would work with my machine. After a week or two of random kernel panics, freezing, and general suckiness, I called AppleCare because I wasn't sure if it was the PowerBook or Ram. Three days later, Apple had serviced my powerbook and returned with free overnight shipping both ways and found that faulty ram was the issue. Unfortunately, forgot to send me back the RAM they took out of the system. Meanwhile, I called Crucial to get a replacement for the busted ram. So now a second piece of ram was on its way and billed to my credit card until I returned the first. Two weeks later, Apple never found the ram and eventually shipped me a stick of Apple-Branded ram to replace the Ram they inadvertently stole. So I then had to beg and please Crucial to take back the second stick.

      Come to think of it, I got a stick of Apple-branded ram for the price of a stick of shitty Crucial ram. Maybe I will buy from Crucial again.

      --
      [insert lame joke here]
    14. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      It is one thing to say that you won't guarantee it'll work. It's quite another thing to assert strongly that it is guaranteed not to work.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    15. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Crucial told someone else this:

      ---- The difference bewteen part CT372707 and CT6464X265 is the PCB revision. Part CT372707 = CT6464X256AP (note the AP)

      CT372707 is specifically for the Apple iBook (G4 1.2GHz) as standard parts CT6464X265 can sometimes be incompatible. This is due to a change in the JEDEC standards.

      Apples with standard memory will sometimes give the error "Bad memory" or "kernal panic". The memory however is not faulty. ---


      Maybe I'm reading it wrong or being overly cynical, but doesn't that translate into this?

      Even though the standard has changed, we still sell memory for the old standard without saying so. This old-standard memory will not necessarily work correctly, but it's not broken, we swear.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    16. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Apple's problem, not Crucial's

    17. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Cyn · · Score: 1

      No - the problem is the powerbook doesn't work well with the 'old standard' memory. How can you blame memory that works fine everywhere else, worked fine when it was *the* standard, and only stopped working when Apple started using some new feature/etc/blah of the newer standard.

      Firefox has a rendering bug with Slashdot. Slashdot uses an older HTML standard (probably about 2.0 with how kludgy it is, but still). Just because slashdot uses an older standard, doesn't mean firefox shouldn't work with it. If it's not going to - then they either need to be clear that they don't work with Slashdot, fix it (it'll be fixed in 1.1), or make it otherwise clear so people don't keep bitching about it.

      Firefox = Powerbook
      'old' Memory = Slashdot

      They're right - the memory isn't bad - and it's not an "old standard" - it's just as possible that the newer memory won't work in systems where the old one will.

      Bottom line - if there are backward incompatible changes, you should be building your hardware to avoid them - or even better, the name / physical format should change so people don't confuse the two.

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    18. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by cymen · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what's going on here. It's obvious that this e-mail is at extreme odds with the truth. One explanation is that they've caught on to the idea that Mac owners have more money, and they decided to cash in. Another explanation is that their customer support is incompetent. Either way, I see no reason to buy from them and every reason to avoid them.

      It's not just Mac users -- it's almost every single customer that doesn't know any better that there is generic memory. Crucial is a ripoff these days so it's not even worth wasting your time visiting their site. It's sad when they were so decent a couple years ago.

    19. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by sydsavage · · Score: 1
      Yep, those guys are the the best I've found for upgrading Macs. I've bought a ton of stuff from them to upgrade my Rev. A G3, known affectionately as FrankenMac. It's got an upgraded (and overclocked) CPU from them, maxed out the ram with three 256mb sticks, upgraded to a 10k rpm scsi drive, pci usb & firewire cards, and a video ram upgrade. I also added a 10/100 ethernet card, but not from them. I've considered upgrading to a 1ghz G3 processor, and a 128meg ATI video card, but at this point, I'd rather put that money towards a shiny new Mac. This one just chugs along doing everything I ask of it anyhow. (It's currently running headless as an internet firewall/gateway and mp3 server.)

      I've never understood where people are coming from that say you can't upgrade a Mac. This old bugger has the CPU in a ZIF socket, three PCI slots, IDE and SCSI on the motherboard, and takes standard ram. You can also get a cheap ($10) VGA converter to use any old monitor with it.

      The firewire card I popped in was expressly labeled that it would not work in a Mac. But when I compared it to their Mac offering that was about 5x the price, they looked like the same card to me. So, I took a leap of faith that it wouldn't hurt my machine, and it was up and running, with no drivers to install, in a matter of minutes, and I've never had any problem with it what so ever. Definitely an example of a 3rd party gouging the Mac users. (Note: the firewire card was NOT purchased from OWC.)

    20. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Bad example. Slashdot's HTML claims to be HTML 3.2. However, if you actually look at the HTML, it is not valid HTML 3.2 either. It is not valid HTML 2.0. In fact, it is not valid HTML at all!

    21. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by snakeOil · · Score: 1
      Yeah Crucial memory did cause problems for my Ibook G4 800MHZ. Called customer support and they told me for that the newer single sided memory seems to cause problems on ibooks. At least internally at Crucial it's a known issue for a while. Outside I couldn't find any mention of it. Why they can't post a disclaimer on the site is beyond me. Anyway, the double sided ones didn't work either so I got a full refund.

      Furthermore when these kernal panics happened, Apple refuse to have anything to do w/ it. They just keep telling me to buy their RAM which at the time was twice the price I paid at Crucial. At the end, I bought the Apple (made by Samsung I think) and it works fine now. Though I have a bit less respect for both Apple and Crucial now.

    22. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all you needed to do was send the replacement crucial stick back to crucial. duh.

    23. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      For every "crucial caused problems", there's another "crucial is the best..."

      Everyone should take these anecdotes with the "YMMV" tag.

      I have nothing but crucial ram in my G4 and G5 (I replaced all the ram on the G4), and have had no problems at all with it.

      But, as I said... YMMV. I trust crucial, because after 10 computers and 2 different architectures (PC and Mac), I've never had a stick of crucial ram go bad or come to my house bad.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    24. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1
      But did you check the date codes on that RAM? If the date codes have expired, and the RAM is not fresh, you could encounter problems. Better email OWC Larry and ask him if he's resolved the date code issue.
      </dealmac inside joke>
      Good to hear FrankenMac is still going strong.

      I'e also ordered a ton of shit from OWC and have been extremely pleased with their customer service. I'll pimp for them any day.
      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    25. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did apple do wrong? You tried to use cheap, non-conformant memory, and it didn't work. Apple said they wouldn't help you with the cheap, non-conformant memory. Duh?

    26. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I cracked open my mac mini to swap out the ram. (picked a 1 gb for $160 at frys) and I was surprised to see that the 256k ram stick was pc3200, samsung brand. I am a little worried with my pc2700 memory now.

    27. Re:Buying generic RAM for mini is dangerous by aventius · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... Apple never gave it back to me. I had two problems. Crappy Crucial ram in the first place and Apple stealing my RAM by accident. The point of the story is that its funny... you know... never mind... humor is wasted on /.

      --
      [insert lame joke here]
  70. You have no idea what you linked to, read backward by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    Did you read the page? Do you understand what the hell is going on there?

    Scroll down to the targeted host apple.com and click on it (link provided for you).

    Now read the WHOLE PAGE. Those are advertisers that Gator pops up WHEN YOU ARE BROWSING APPLE.COM.

    Key distinction there. It's not that APPLE is advertising. It's that gator is DISPLAYING OTHER ADS when you are on Apple.com.

    Living proof that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

    As for the suing thing, Apple is actually suing to find out who the employees are that are leaking details. I'm not that happy about them suing they guy but I have to say that whoever leaked these details has probably crossed the line because they have seriously broken a contract a NDA they signed. Previous rumors have been close but this last wave was just too exacting in detail.

    If you want to be angry at someone how about wondering why these employees do not come forward and give themselves up instead of letting this kid twist in the wind.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  71. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by valhallaprime · · Score: 1

    Any other company, you'd scream for their heads? Are you crazy? for what? I totally agree with the above 2 replies, and am totally befuddled for your comment of "holding apple accountable for their actions". What actions? Oh, the spyware Gator link you had that was dated a year ago? Even if it was the real Apple, chances strongly are that it was a media buy done by one of their many ad agencies, without their knowledge. Oh, and let's behead apple because they want to find out where sensitive (NDA-CLASS!) leaks are originating from within their company. Finally, as an extremely minor stockholder in Apple, who has tripled his once-3digit value in 1 year...on behalf of the Board of Directors of Apple Computer, We for one, welcome your non-support of us.

  72. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    ok, the kid is a dumb ass for posting the news. would it kill him to wait for 2 minutes after Steve jobs shows it? lack of self restraint does not mean he is right.

    He found out about something that was newsworthy. He reported it. This is freedom of speech at its finest. Doesn't that make him right?

  73. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by ad0gg · · Score: 1

    I posted the wrong page.Correction.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  74. Mac Mini and Linux by LetterRip · · Score: 1

    Read over at Osnews the other day that since the current chip controller for the fan isn't supported by Linux it defaults the fan to the wide open state, thus instead of whisper quite with Mac OS X the fan is really loud.

    LetterRip

    1. Re:Mac Mini and Linux by RedBear · · Score: 1

      That's just goofy to me, that the fan is software-controlled. They've had a lot of trouble with fans in the Power Mac G5s, that must be why. What is the benefit of software control over a nice reliable hardware controller?

  75. Re:Pist Frost by mkop · · Score: 1

    Get one from here free as well. I new some one would post it before me

  76. Indeed, you get a lot more... by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    You get a lot more computer - about 5x larger!

    You get a lot more fan noise - try a new HP. WHOOOOOOOSH!

    You get a lot more spyware helping you browse. Apple doesn't help you browse. What the hell is up with that!

    You get a lot more product activation. Without product activation, all your products would just lie dormant!

    You get more wait time for a major OS update. Waiting gives you time to read and makes you smarter!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  77. Approximately what sort of PC does this match? by ratbag · · Score: 1

    I'm a Photoshop user, considering a second-hand dual-G5 (approx 2000 UK pounds with a 23" screen). I'm using a 2.4Ghz Intel box with 1Gb RAM. Would a 1.42 mini with 1Gb RAM be in the same neck of the woods as far as filtering/sharpening work is concerned?

    1. Re:Approximately what sort of PC does this match? by ratbag · · Score: 1

      ie does the mini compare well with the PC, not the dual G5. Sorry for the self-reply!

    2. Re:Approximately what sort of PC does this match? by imnojezus · · Score: 1

      I use a P4 dual 2.4 with 1 Gig RAM to do high res photo editing and layout. My marketing manager just got a dual 1.8 G5, and it opens and renders MUCH faster than the PC. The color correction is also pretty much perfect out of the box (I still reccomend having a color specialist come in and configure everything for print). But it really is a better system for that type of work. So much so that I'm spending a lot less time at my workstation, and a lot more time at hers. There really is a reason why graphic design houses and photo studios tend to be Mac-only strongholds.

    3. Re:Approximately what sort of PC does this match? by sellers · · Score: 1

      You would find it would be similar. Filtering and Sharpening. Hard to say. The floating point operations of the IBM/PPC chips are usually better than x86 chips from Intel.

      Take an image that you need to filter - burn it to a CDRW or an usb thumb/keydrive, and visit an AppleStore and try it out on a Powerbook or iBook. That should give you a good estimate. Talk to the guys @ the store, I'm sure they will help you. They look at it as a potential sale...

    4. Re:Approximately what sort of PC does this match? by tu_holmes · · Score: 1

      I have asked the same question numerous times...

      I finally found a website, that while somewhat "mac-centric", does appear to be pretty fair and even when relating to CPU speeds across multiple platforms. Check here:

      http://www.systemshootouts.org/processors.html

      Another site shows them like this:

      http://www.michaelscomputers.com/cpuscores.htm

      Perhaps this will give you some sort of indication of where exactly it fits on the scale of performance compared to your standard x86 cpus.

      Since either way it's faster than the P3 I currently have, I'll probably get one.
      I do like it's style, and I liked the Xserve G5 I demo'ed for work... Maybe I too can become a Mac Zeolot!

    5. Re:Approximately what sort of PC does this match? by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Something is goofy on the list at that second link you gave. They say a DUAL 1.42GHz PPC is only 1.25% faster than a single 1.25GHz PPC. That can't possibly be correct.

    6. Re:Approximately what sort of PC does this match? by RedBear · · Score: 1

      I think you will find that the Mac mini is a great computer but will fall short in an area that is important in graphics work: disk speed. Internally it has a 4200rpm notebook hard drive that really slows down disk-intensive applications. If you were adventuresome you could replace it with a new 7200rpm notebook drive (try Newegg, Hitachi makes two different models, 40GB with 1-year warranty and 60GB with 3-year warranty). That, plus a 1GHz stick of guaranteed-compatible RAM from Crucial.com, would make a world of difference.

      As for processor speed, it's very difficult to compare the GHz ratings directly because each chip architecture has strong points and weak points in different areas. I have heard tell the PPC chip is pretty good for Photoshop work because of its strong floating point performance.

      If you're really worried about speed, I'd get a low-end G5 Power Mac or even a second-hand G4 Power Mac, pack it with RAM and install a fast hard drive like the Western Digital Raptor 10,000rpm SATA drive. If you get a G4 you'll need an SATA controller card, but that's no big deal. The hard drive is really one of the biggest bottlenecks in computers these days. You'll probably be surprised how much a faster drive will help. Hell, pack in two SATA Raptor drives and use Mac OS X's built-in abilities to create a RAID0 array. Talk about speed. Or use the RAID0 as a scratch disk for Photoshop and boot from a third Raptor. But now we're getting a little crazy. Just a little. ;)

      The Mac mini can be a great home or general work computer, but for a "workstation" machine to use for actual computer-intensive work, I'd personally go for the Power Mac. No bottlenecks, more room for RAM (up to 8GB) and fast drives, etc.

    7. Re:Approximately what sort of PC does this match? by ratbag · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the pointers - you're a star.

      Rob.

    8. Re:Approximately what sort of PC does this match? by tu_holmes · · Score: 1

      I agree that it looks fishy, however they say that theirs is based on "real world", and the other is based on an algorithm and real world... Who knows?

  78. Re:I have an open access point at my work by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

    Either you have serious reading comprehension problems or you are trying to be funny and I simply don't get it. Thanks for trying though.

    --
    Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
  79. Yay! by ceeam · · Score: 1

    I most definitely gonna buy one of those till summer. Pity that I can't quite afford it right now :( I try to keep my expectations on the lower side though. So far I have not seen anything that I would be happy with for home computer - Windows sucks ass (and _severely_ lacks good software these days, as funny as it sounds) and Linux is not for my desktop too (should I hide right now?). Yep - Linux OTOH makes a good server and Windows makes a good... uhm, waste of money? I never owned a Mac and hopefully it is close to what I'm looking for. I don't care much whether it's ultra tiny or it can render Toy Story. I just want to have something usable and fun to play with. Is it easy to program for these days?

    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is it easy to program for these days?
      Yes. Here's a good place to start. All your regular C and C++ programming stuff should apply since the typical compiler for the Mac is gcc and the commmand line environment is BSD Unix. Also, for native Mac OS X GUI stuff, here's where you can find out about some books. For learning how to program the GUI, you can check into Cocoa Programming for Mac OS X by Aaron Hillgass. For an introduction to the language used for programming with the Cocoa libraries you can try Peogramming in Objective C by Stephen Kochan. You might want to buy the Objective C book first. You can also learn Objective C on anything with gcc, but the libraries will be different from the Mac's.
  80. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the fact that AMD, Intel, and IBM are also on that list, I'm curious, what processor are you running in your computer?

    Do you mean to say that you don't use products / services from any company on that list?

  81. It doesn't work that way. by i41Overlord · · Score: 5, Informative

    So to recap, what apple is installing is "better" in terms of stability, and if they use faster-rated RAM (say, PC3000) to build it, the speed lost to ECC and buffering will be negligible compared to normal PC2700.

    It doesn't work that way. SDRAM is synchronous memory and the chipset will attempt to run the memory at the speed of the bus. Faster memory will not make the bus go any faster than the chipset's rated speed.

    For example, I had a KT333 chipset which had a 333 mhz bus speed. It used PC2700 memory, which is 333 mhz memory. I had a power surge and my MB died. So I replaced it with a KT266 motherboard, which only has a 266 mhz bus speed (PC2100 speed). I still used my old PC2700 memory, but the memory now operates at the bus speed, which is 266 mhz. It is not any faster than if I just had PC2100 memory in it, since it can only run as fast as the chipset can drive it.

    The Mac mini's chipset works at 333 mhz, which is PC2700 speed. Putting in PC3000 or faster won't make the memory speed be any faster- it'll always run at 333 mhz.

    1. Re:It doesn't work that way. by gabebear · · Score: 1

      That's not totally true, you can generally run underclocked RAM at a higher access time(the time the computer waits for the RAM to set down to a state). I had a very similar thing happen to me, although it was the other way. I bought a 333 module for a 266 mobo and then upgraded the mobo later. The 266mobo automatically used more shorter timing for my underclocked modules.

      not that timing makes much of a speed different, but it is a speed increase non the less

  82. Slap in the Face by xero314 · · Score: 1

    This is a huge slap in the face to future buyers of other mac products, particularly PowerBooks. I have been looking to upgrade my PowerBook for a little while, but when they are charge powerbook buyers more than twice that as mac mini buyers for essencially the same upgrades I just get alittle pissed off.

    256k to 512k upgrade (both DDR333 SDRAM on single stick):
    - Mac Mini: $75
    - Power Book: $200
    40 to 80 gig hard drive:
    - Mac Mini: $50
    60 to 80 gig hard drive:
    - Power Book: $125

    Being a Mac owner for a while now, I will just say they better do something for their higher end buyers or they may loose out on that market.

    1. Re:Slap in the Face by ip_fired · · Score: 2, Insightful

      256[MB] to 512[MB] upgrade (both DDR333 SDRAM on single stick):
      - Mac Mini: $75
      - Power Book: $200


      This isn't a fair comparison as the laptop uses SO-DIMMS, which are more expensive. I should also point out that people who get Apple memory upgrades have money to burn, especially with a powerbook, since the memory is user installable.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    2. Re:Slap in the Face by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Laptop memory is usually more expensive than regular memory since it is
      a smaller form factor. If the Mac Mini uses laptop memory, then you have
      a legitimate complaint. Otherwise, you don't.

      From the pictures of the Mac Mini internals, it looked to me like it took
      a single stick of regular memory. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    3. Re:Slap in the Face by ameoba · · Score: 0

      You realize that, because of it's small form factor, the Mac Mini is almost entirely built of laptop components. This includes SODIMM memory.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:Slap in the Face by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      No, all the photos of the inside have shown very clearly that the ram is a standard 184 pin stick of DDR.

    5. Re:Slap in the Face by DyNoMiTe24 · · Score: 1

      It is regular sized DDR memory. That is why it could not be any smaller. The case width or depth, I dont remember which one it is, but its almost exactly the size of a stick. If they went with more expensive laptop memory it probably could be a little smaller.

    6. Re:Slap in the Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For memory, they are different but the price difference is not that great. From crucial:

      $96 - 512 DDR333 SODIMM (powerbook)
      $81 - 512 DDR333 DIMM (mini)

      Both use 2.5" harddrives however so that comparison is valid.

    7. Re:Slap in the Face by Vengie · · Score: 1

      The form factor is defined by the size of the optical drive. Having been limited by the size of the CD/DVD drive, they went with regular sized memory since there was no benefit to using laptop form factor parts, as the size was already set. [hence 6x6x2.5]

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    8. Re:Slap in the Face by xero314 · · Score: 1

      It is still a fair comparison for a couple reasons.
      1) There is not a 266% price difference between SO-DIMMS and standard.
      2) I was only complaining about the drop in price. Since Mac Mini memory dropped 30% then so should PowerBook memory, since the price of memory did not drop just the mark up.

    9. Re:Slap in the Face by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Crap. I thought I read some reviews that said it took SO-DIMMs. Good thing I posted without the karma bonus.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  83. What does BTO mean to you? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't believe they have a lot of inventory, BTO means just what it says. Do you think Dell has every combination of possible configurations you could have laying about in huge piles?

    As proof BTO usually delays projected shipping a bit beyond what you have with a stock order.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What does BTO mean to you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple still has to place a minimum order with _their_ supplier. Apple's supplier _isn't_ building to order... apple is.

  84. Re:Upgrades are still over priced... by jridley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This has been covered countless times before. The Mac is actually a very good deal if you equip a PC with comparable software.
    I've never owned a Mac, but I would buy this if I didn't already have more computers than I need.

  85. Cracking the case with putty knives... by DanCentury · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think I'll wait a few weeks, the price will drop more, and then I won't have to bother with the putty knives!

    Everybody -- keep posting articles about hacking the Mac Mini so the price will drop quicker!

  86. Is this really a good buy? by Foobar_Zen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ok, so I too was curious about the mac mini and I would love to have one at home to play with. So I priced one out. Below is the one I priced out and a comparable Dell system. Now the Dell does have a keyboard and mouse, but I tried to get them as close as possible. They also both have 1 year warranties and free shipping. It should also be said that dell is currently running a 15% off special that ends today.

    Mac mini
    512MB DDR333 SDRAM - 1 DIMM
    80GB Ultra ATA drive
    4x SuperDrive (DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    56K v.92 Modem
    Mac OS X - U.S. English
    1.42GHz PowerPC G4

    Subtotal $774.00

    Dell Dimension 4700
    * Pentium® 4 Processor 520 with HT Technology (2.80GHz, 800 FSB)
    * 512MB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 400MHz (2x256M)
    * 80GB Serial ATA Hard Drive (7200RPM)
    * Dual Drives: 16x DVD-ROM Drive + 48x CD-RW Drive
    * Windows XP Home
    * 56k Modem
    Subtotal $685.00

    So my big question, besides the obvious price drop from normal Apple systems and putting aside the whole Mac vs. x86 platform, is where is the real price savings for a new user buying a new home computer? Granted the 15% off is a big factor, but Dell runs similar specials all the time.

    1. Re:Is this really a good buy? by saddino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're missing the intangibles. According to your pricing, a prospective customer would have to ask "is a much lighter, smaller, cooler looking Mac without the headaches of Windows that includes iLife worth an extra $89?"

      Apple is betting yes. And next quarter we'll see what the market said.

    2. Re:Is this really a good buy? by 0BoDy · · Score: 1

      isn't that the one that comes with aol preinstalled "for your convieninece" and isn't that a celeron with intel extreme Graphics? vs radeon 9700. not to mention that normally the performance to price ratio from MAC to x86 makes OS X a $1500 OS. I think considering all that. . . and the fact that the mini is 6.5 x 6.5 x 2 instead of 24 x 7 x 20 and sits quietly anywhere. a difference of under $100 is substantial, and definitely makes it way better than comperable dell system.

      --
      Can I be a Luddite too?
    3. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Chirs · · Score: 1

      The mac also includes a fair bit of software that the Dell does not (word processor, etc.).

      You also get OSX, which for the techy person is nice because you get the unix cli goodness with easy-to-use gui overlay.

      You'll still have the possibility of linux dual-boot if desired, although the fan controller support is not yet in the mainstream kernels.

      The Dell has crappy onboard intel video hardware, while the mini has a Radeon 9200 with svideo and composite out.

      Finally, the mini is *way* smaller and more stylish than the Dell. For something that will be on the desktop this is a serious bonus. For something that will set beside the desk, not a big deal.

    4. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Alternate+Interior · · Score: 1

      The default Mini optical drive is a combo drive - that's a DVD-ROM/CD-RW. Since that's all the Dell has, its fair. And coincidentally, that makes the price match. BTW - the Mini actually uses DDR400. Yes - it does say 333 everywhere, but 333 does not work (at least when I tried it in mine). They ship with DDR400.

    5. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but the Mini comes with all sorts of video and music editing programs that most people that will never use, which makes the Mac a better deal!!

    6. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does your Mac Mini have a Superdrive and the Dell doesn't have the ability to write DVDs? That's a bit disingenious.

      And ... well, when it comes to looks, there's no competition. Do you want a Dell or an Apple on your desk?

    7. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Your Dell configuration has an error or two:

      Windows XP Home should be Windows XP Pro to be comparable to OS X. That's another $100. Now, squeeze all those components into a case that is 2" high and 6" wide and long. What is the premium that you would have to pay for that engineering?

    8. Re:Is this really a good buy? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      2 problems with your comparison:

      The dell price, +15% is $787.75. Yes, Dell often offeres specials, but not all that often.

      Also, your Dell box lacks a DVD writer. Switching from the Dual drives to a single DVD+-RW/CD-RW drive adds $35, bringing even the 15% off price fairly close to the mini.

    9. Re:Is this really a good buy? by slide-rule · · Score: 1

      So my big question, besides the obvious price drop from normal Apple systems and putting aside the whole Mac vs. x86 platform, is where is the real price savings for a new user buying a new home computer? Granted the 15% off is a big factor, but Dell runs similar specials all the time.

      You just discounted the reason with your "besides" stipulation... it isn't "price" saved as much as its "value" earned -- specifically because of Mac vs. x86 platform. On one hand you have hardware and software quality controlled by Apple (plus customer goodwill, or so I hear), on the other hand, you have parts and software from different places (with different quality control standards) that Dell is just assembling and/or rebadging, deciding "yep, it works", and moving it out the door. Even not winning on bottom-line price, many people feel the value in "Mac" goodness (including OS X's UNIX-ness for people here in /.) still wins in the end. Plus, for me, size and noise are a big issue... just how small/quiet is that Dell system, anyway? (Dual optical drives makes me think tower...)

    10. Re:Is this really a good buy? by White+Roses · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I know someone already told you this, but two things:
      1. XP Home isn't anywhere near as powerful as Mac OS X. Put XP Pro on that box.
      2. DVD-RW vs. DVD-ROM. Drop the Superdrive from the Mini, or add the burner to the Dell.
      How's that comparison now? Enough to absorb the missing keyboard and mouse?

      Oh, and for the record, the real savings is in having a system that has fewer annoying habits, has a consistent UI across applications, and is less susceptible to worms, virus infections, and spyware, as well as including a robust suite of polished, easy-to-use applications that will cover most of the needs of the freshman computer enthusiast (photography, music, basic word processing, even movies).

      "How do I get photos from the Sony Mavica to iPhoto?" my wife asked me. Answer: Plug in the USB cable, and when iPhoto automatcially opens, click the blue pill clearly labelled "Import." Tell me that Dell will be able to do that OUT OF THE BOX!

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
    11. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell Dimension 3000
      *Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor (2.80GHz, 533 FSB)
      *512MB Dual Channel 400MHz DDR SDRAM
      *80GB Ultra ATA/100 7200RPM Hard Drive
      *16X CD/DVD burner (DVD+/-RW) w/double layer write capability
      *Discounted 2 Yr Basic Plan (onsite)
      *Free Shipping

      $544.00 - $100 rebate, $444.00 + tax total.
      (It comes with a mouse, KB, and Word Perfect as well).

    12. Re:Is this really a good buy? by GauteL · · Score: 1

      1. How big is the Dell (physical dimensions)?
      2. How much power does the Dell consume on average?
      3. How much noise does each of these use?
      4. How stylish does the Dell look?
      5. How come you only put a DVD/CD-RW in the Dell?

      You have to compare like for like. Show me a price example with a PC that is equally small, noiseless and uses as little power, and THEN we can start comparing prices.

      In addition. The Apple computer does not have to be exactly as cheap as the PC, because people WILL buy an Apple at a premium because of the software and integration.

      I'm not impressed with the $89 savings you showed with the Dell, even if it has a faster processor.

    13. Re:Is this really a good buy? by xmda · · Score: 1

      "How do I get photos from the Sony Mavica to iPhoto?" my wife asked me. Answer: Plug in the USB cable, and when iPhoto automatcially opens, click the blue pill clearly labelled "Import." Tell me that Dell will be able to do that OUT OF THE BOX!

      Come on, give us a break! Have you ever tried doing that in Windows XP? If you do the same on Windows XP, a dialog will pop up asking you what you want to do (like browse the camera as a disk, opening bla bla program etc). I'm the closest to a anti-MS-fanatic there is, but it is silly to come with silly examples like that. Silly man! :)

    14. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      All this time and you people still can't recognize the compare-Apples-to-Oranges troll? Is it not the oldest of them all?

      I haven't scrolled down but I know there will be at least 20 responses and probably a thread of 50 as everyone points out the grandparent's "mistake".

    15. Re:Is this really a good buy? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      How about the time you save not having to run spyware scans daily/weekly? Also, what software does that Dell come with? Does it come with anything comparable to iLife? How about Appleworks, iWork, and Quicken? That's added $$.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    16. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Cederic · · Score: 1, Interesting


      >> a robust suite of polished, easy-to-use applications that will cover most of the needs of the freshman computer enthusiast (photography, music, basic word processing, even movies).

      Games. They're the sole reason I run Windows, and have been for 4-5 years now.

      For all your Mac advocacy I will still not be even considering a Mac until all the games I want to play are guaranteed a Mac release.

    17. Re:Is this really a good buy? by aszoth · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to factor in the cost of iLife. Even if you don't give it the full value.

      I don't know what software comes with XP but getting, iPhoto, iMovie, iDVD, and Garageband is a nice bonus when you by your mac mini.

    18. Re:Is this really a good buy? by White+Roses · · Score: 1

      Right, right. And that software is included on the Dell, right?

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
    19. Re:Is this really a good buy? by White+Roses · · Score: 1
      PS2? X-Box? Do you really think people that the Mac Mini is targeting are looking to play Halo or World of Warcraft or Half-Life 2? Can you play any of your games on the Dell listed here?

      If you want to guarantee a Mac release, then you and all your gamer friends should get Macs, and buy the games that are out now (Halo, Jedi Academy, whatever). The market for Mac games is small. Smaller than consoles, smaller than Windows, smaller than NGage probably.

      I'm a casual gamer. PS2 covers my needs there just fine. These days, I'm also pretty much a casual computer user at home, so having a system that is very low maintenance is of supreme importance to me. But then, I've been using Macs at home exclusively since '96, so I know how to navigate corporate policy to keep my house MS free.

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
    20. Re:Is this really a good buy? by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      Actually it probably will.

      Two years ago when I hooked up my Sony DigiCam via firewire to my Sony laptop running XP Pro, it automatically launches the video import/editing software and prompts me to start pulling down footage.

      I don't know if the Dell has similar software, but considering XP now ships with Movie Maker, it probably behaves in a similar fashion.

      --
      -David
    21. Re:Is this really a good buy? by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      Too bad the Dell doesn't come with XP.

    22. Re:Is this really a good buy? by plusser · · Score: 1

      Is anything with Windows installed on it a good buy?

    23. Re:Is this really a good buy? by White+Roses · · Score: 1
      Yes, OK. But who made the video software? Sony? Sony harware running Sony software that accurately detects a Sony camera is to be expected. Isn't that exactly the sort of lock-in that Apple is accused of constantly? It works so well because it's all from one vendor. The list of iPhoto and iMovie compatible cameras grows constantly. I've even seen a number of unofficial cameras work with iPhoto (similar chipset or something perhaps). And, again, it's consistent. Just hit the big blue pill.

      As far as I could tell, the Dell above comes with WordPerfect. And not a lot of other software. Quicken 2005 was extra. Anti-virus/spyware was extra (and an absolute necessity in many cases - though freeware alternatives exist). And XP Pro's cost helped to launch the Dell above the Mac's cost.

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
    24. Re:Is this really a good buy? by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      Huh? What, preytell, does it come with then?

      It was listed in the parent's comparison.

      --
      -David
    25. Re:Is this really a good buy? by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      The Movie Maker software is free with XP Home. Pro not required.

      And while my Sony/Sony/Sony stuff does work because it's from the same folks, that was two years ago.

      I've seen first-hand of similar experiences using HP equipment on a Dell machine, or Sony equipment on an HP machine, etc etc. Window's built-in digital camera management software is quite nice for being included in the OS.

      Another example: I can sync my Motorola phone with Outlook via USB, and I never installed any software or drivers.

      --
      -David
    26. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      "Do you really think people that the Mac Mini is targeting are looking to play Halo or World of Warcraft or Half-Life 2? Can you play any of your games on the Dell listed here?"

      Just a note: The MacMini, with a RAM upgrade, meets or beats all of the requirements for World of Warcraft. Of course, I'm not entirely sure how it *runs* given those requirements, but it does meet or beat them.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    27. Re:Is this really a good buy? by djwu · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that OS X isn't only limited to US English. It comes with every language you can think of ... ie. Japanese, German, UK English, Spanish, Chinese, Korean, Thai, Russian, Arabic, etc. It's just a change of the International options in the System preferences.

    28. Re:Is this really a good buy? by mmarlett · · Score: 1

      Actually, 15% off to get to $685 means that the starting point was about $805. ($805 * 15% = $120.75. $805-$120.75 = $684.25) And there's still the DVD writer issue. And that XP Home is not even close to as good as OS X. So, is the machine that's more expensive with weaker parts a better value? No, I don't think it is.

    29. Re:Is this really a good buy? by TheOneEyedMan · · Score: 1

      "XP Home isn't anywhere near as powerful as Mac OS X. Put XP Pro on that box."

      What functionality is the home user going to get that warrents XP Pro?

      They have the same kernal, they just differ in their groupwhere software, which the home user prob. won't care about.

      ~OEM

      --
      Reality is that which refuses to go away when I stop believing in it. --Phillip K. Dick (remove SPAM to email)
    30. Re:Is this really a good buy? by fermion · · Score: 1
      I priced the cheapest machine at HP, and it was over $800. It did have a better DVD drive, and might be faster in certain situations.

      The problem, as always, it what you want. The PC has always been a good choice when one just needed a cheap GPC or a computer dedicated to MS Office, or some vertical application. One does not need a quality machine for the grunt. However, when we are talking about a versitile GPC, and starting getting into things like speed, quality, support, then the Mac became a competitor.

      The issue is as it has always been. What is equal. Is XP home equal to OS X, or must you add $50 to the PC. Does anyone need OS X, or is that just a luxury. Is the fact you won't be interrogated everytime you want to download an unpdate worth nothing. Is the fact that most paid-for-updates are not security critical, but merely performance upgrades.

      Apple would be a fool to undercut the WinTel pricing. The WinTel machine has it's place in the world, and those that produce it are happy making a few dollars per machine and liking MS balls for the rest. The thing that so few people on /. don't understand is that there is room for everything. If all you need is WinTel machine, buy it. If you are happy with Linux on x86, that is great.

      For many of us, Apple has provided us with quality machines for 20 years. A little more, but perhaps we value a computer more than a more expensive car. We are already distressed at the quality issues that appear as Apple build cheaper machines. If we wanted a cheap PC, we would get a cheap PC.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    31. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people just don't get it. A friend of mine was going to build a computer and insisted on putting Windows XP Pro on it.

      Me: Why?
      Friend: Because XP Pro can do things that home cant".
      Me: such as?
      Friend: I don't know, but I read it somewhere.

      Whatever, it's his money to waste. Unless you plan on connecting to a windows domain it's a waste of money. Well it's his cash to blow not mine. Apperently you just can't convince some people otherwise.

    32. Re:Is this really a good buy? by horza · · Score: 1

      So my big question, besides the obvious price drop from normal Apple systems and putting aside the whole Mac vs. x86 platform, is where is the real price savings for a new user buying a new home computer?

      You get to keep your friends. I've fixed 5 of my friends XP machines over the past few days and it's not fun. They are good friends and so I don't charge them but I'm SICK of it. I've already stated that I no longer fix machines where IE or Outlooked is used (that includes family and friends).

      Connecting friends WinXP machine to ADSL here:
      * a couple of hours install - downloading the security patches (ie blaster etc) and a firewall offline and burning onto CD, fixing driver conflicts, constantly rebooting until other problems go away (eg an hour ago a XP laptop refused to shut down until 1/2 dozen hard resets then started working for no reason) - and then an hour or two each month to fix the mess XP gets into after a lot of surfing the 'net

      Connecting OSX to the 'net:
      * they never need me, it just works

      I've done a couple of Linux installs but I haven't found a distro I can standardise on so don't want to maintain multiple versions (Gentoo is too slow to install, not over-happy with Mandrake atm, Knoppix is best so far). From now on I'm going to recommend Mac.

      Phillip.

    33. Re:Is this really a good buy? by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      I detest these apples-to-oranges comparisons, but I'll be a fool and respond to a responder.

      ...as well as including a robust suite of polished, easy-to-use applications that will cover most of the needs of the freshman computer enthusiast (photography, music, basic word processing, even movies).

      Microsoft Works Suite is a $25 option for the Dell. That gives you more than iPhoto (Picture It! Premium) and more than basic word processing (Microsoft Word). As for music and movies, that's included in the OS (Media Player and Movie Maker).

      "How do I get photos from the Sony Mavica to iPhoto?" my wife asked me. Answer: Plug in the USB cable, and when iPhoto automatcially opens, click the blue pill clearly labelled "Import." Tell me that Dell will be able to do that OUT OF THE BOX!

      Okay. Dell will be able to do that OUT OF THE BOX!. Except you need to choose the default app (or the OS) to import pictures the first time you do it. Jeez, it's not that hard.

      XP Home isn't anywhere near as powerful as Mac OS X. Put XP Pro on that box.

      Depends on if the user needs it, but that's a $67 option. The G4 processor in the Mac mini isn't anywhere near as powerful as the Prescott-based Pentium 4 processor. But that's not an upgradable option on the Mac mini. Other non-changable features are the modern architecture (800MHz bus, PCI Express) of the Dell, expandability of the Dell, beautiful style of the Mac mini, and the small footprint of the Mac mini.

      Apples-to-oranges indeed. The Dell 4700 is much more like a single processor G5 PowerMac than a Mac mini, but it would still be useless to compare them.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    34. Re:Is this really a good buy? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I think the market for Mac gaming machines is bigger than you and Apple realize. I, for example, would upgrade from my 800MHz iBook G4 instantly if I could get one with a better graphics card (e.g. Mobile Radeon 9600 or 9700). And I would do it even faster than instantly if Half-Life 2 (or even original Half-Life, for Team Fortress Classic) were available for Mac. And I'm not alone; the guy you're replying to would get a Mac for gaming as well. In fact, recently the single biggest argument I hear against the Mac is no longer "it's too expensive;" instead it's "but it won't run PC games!"

      I believe if Apple came out with a "Multimedia Mini" with a TV tuner and a decent GPU, and put some effort into enticing more PC games to the platform (and getting released at the same time as the Windows version rather than months or years later), they would mop the floor with every other PC manufacturer -- especially if they actually told people about it (I can't believe they don't have TV commercials for the iMac G5 or Mac Mini -- with all the hoopla over the iPod, reminding people that they make computers too would be a great idea).

      As it stands, instead of getting $1000 for a new iBook (or $500 for a Mac Mini), the most Apple might get from me any time soon is $100 for an iPod Shuffle. I'm gonna spend my money on new hardware (video card) for my PC instead.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    35. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could do what I did - I bought the bare minimum machine, upgraded all the parts myself, and then pirated all the extra software.

    36. Re:Is this really a good buy? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      BTW - the Mini actually uses DDR400. Yes - it does say 333 everywhere, but 333 does not work (at least when I tried it in mine). They ship with DDR400.

      Of course, with the G4's crippled bus they practically may as well be using PC150 SDRAM...

    37. Re:Is this really a good buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I will still not be even considering a Mac until all the games I want to play are guaranteed a Mac release."

      Are all the games you want to play guaranteed a Windows release?
      What do you get if they fail to deliver some game that has been touted as coming. How can you redeem this guarantee?

      also OT: If you really only run Windows to play games, may I suggest freeing yourself of this monkey and returning to reality... we need you. We need all of you!

    38. Re:Is this really a good buy? by root2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course it is! It's part of Windows XP - it will appear on every Windows XP box (and yes, that includes XP Home).

    39. Re:Is this really a good buy? by bastardsquadmuzz · · Score: 1

      I really REALLY wish people would stop comparing Macs to Dells. I'm sick of it. I don't care which is better, I have both and each has it's advantages, but price comparisons and spec-by-spec analyses are gettin on my tit.

      --
      --Muzz
    40. Re:Is this really a good buy? by palo0019 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's built into XP.

    41. Re:Is this really a good buy? by xmda · · Score: 1

      Right, right. And that software is included on the Dell, right?

      Yes it is. And if you would need image manipulating software more powerful than the software included in XP you can always download The Gimp.

      Anyway, my point was that Windows is not that hard to use in certain areas. Not very hard at all. I use it at work and at home I run Linux only.

  87. I've had my mini by bob670 · · Score: 5, Informative

    since last Thursday and it has so far exceeeded my expectations in every way. I contacted Apple last night and they are refunding the price difference to reflect the price drops, I cannot complain. Of course if those prices would have been lower initially I might have ordered more upgrades, but overall I can say this has been an excellent experience with Apple again.

    1. Re:I've had my mini by bob670 · · Score: 5, Informative
      If anyone should care of want details of what life with a mini is like, this is a review I wrote at another forum, maybe you find it helpful....

      I've had my mini since last Thursday so I thought I would post my thoughts for anyone who might be interested....

      Overall the mini is outstanding, right now my list of stuff I run frequently includes....

      Safari

      FireFox

      Mail

      iBlog

      Pages

      KeyNote

      iTunes

      iPhoto

      PhotoShop Elements 2.0

      iSync

      Transmit 2.0

      CandyBar

      Diablo II

      and to a lesser extent...

      iMovie

      GarageBand 2

      Chess

      MacJanitor

      CockTail

      Specs:

      G4 1.42 / 80GB HDD / 512MB RAM / DVD/CD +/-RW combo drive / AE + BT

      NEC LCD1735 NXM w/ DVI cable, Logitech Z3i 2.1 Speakers, Apple Pro Keyboard (wired), Apple Pro Wireless Mouse, D-Link DL-524 Router/WAP, Epson Stylus C80 printer on D-Link 301U ethernet printer server

      Everything opens quickly, usually one bounce on the dock and it's up and usable. I have spent a good deal of time moving my vacation photos (about 800-900) and music (about 3400 tracks) to their repsective apps. Both iTunes and iPhoto still snap right open and are usable pretty quickly, although obviously startup scans of large libraries take a few seconds. Application perfromance is great, very smooth and pretty much what I expect of OS X. Pages and KeyNote are very responsive and stable, PhotoShop Elements 2.0 is the only lagard, as it is on any system.

      A big improvement for me is not having to turn off eye candy and little features to maintain performance. This is my third Mac, I've gone from an iMac G3 700 Snow w/Jag to an iBook G4 800 w/Panther to the mini I am currently running. For the first time I don't have to turn off dock animation or magnification, find a hack around transparency or turn off font smoothing to avoid those occaissional chops that would happen to my other Macs. Finder is smooth and responsive and outside of the occaisional delay with iDisk synching is vastly improved from Jag and even my earlier Panther experiences.

      Browsing my network, mapping drives on my Wintel box and even remote managing my DVR is perfection. I have the AE/BT option. AE immediately finds my Dlink DL-524 and works with it's WPA-PSK settings with no hassle. The Apple wireless mouse was found on first boot and OS X shows you a little 2 step pictogram so the OS can pair the device before it is even compeltely launched. BT performance is overall about the same, although it does not ship with the 1.2 firmware upgrade, which definitely made for smoother mouse tracking. Pairing with my Nokia 3650 is still a little wonky, but this appears to be my phone at fault as it pairs poorly with anything.

      The size is truly impressive and you have to see it in relation to the rest of your hardware to really appreciate it. It runs virtually silent all the time, even under moderate load the fan barely kicks up. The fan is a rotary blower similair to the ones in the new iMacs, although obviously a much lower profile and slighlty different form factor. It does kick up during gaming, and while it makes more noise, it is more of a whoosh of air than anything mechanical or clicky. I think most of the noise is due to the shape of the exhaust vents more than the blower. At higher speeds you can definitely feel it moving some air, so I feel pretty confident the mini gets adequate air flow.

      I am the only one home right now at 7:45a.m., there is very little ambient or background noise to be heard currently, it is probably as close as my place gets to 100% silent and I can barely hear the mini at all, the fan is a whisper at best. I can here thee clock on the wall 20 feet away clicking more than I can hear the mini's fan.

      The hard drive is quiet, I rarely even here it seek. In fact, hard drive noise is so rare when I do hear it I tend to notice it. Hard drive performance has so far proven to be pretty decent, it honestly doesn't feel slow or he

    2. Re:I've had my mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you get an OS install CD with it? I was thinking about getting a Mac Mini and using the install CD to upgrade my iBook, but I'm not sure if that would work.

      (I'd plan on wiping OSX off of the Mini anyway BTW so I don't think that's such a licence issue)

    3. Re:I've had my mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free anonymous spelling correction. Corrected words are in bold. Grammar was not corrected, as sloppy writing is your choice, and altering it would make this a dual-author piece. Also, I am not sure if you actually meant "pair" or "peer" when you talk about the wireless devices... in a sense, the machine does 'pair' with other equipment. If you are going to post this anywhere else, I encourage you to replace your original text with this copy, or at least run a spell checker.

      Overall the mini is outstanding, right now my list of stuff I run frequently includes....

      Safari
      FireFox
      Mail
      iBlog
      Pages
      KeyNote
      iT unes
      iPhoto
      PhotoShop Elements 2.0
      iSync
      Transmit 2.0
      CandyBar
      Diablo II

      and to a lesser extent...

      iMovie
      GarageBand 2
      Chess
      MacJanitor
      CockTail

      Specs:

      G4 1.42 / 80GB HDD / 512MB RAM / DVD/CD +/-RW combo drive / AE + BT

      NEC LCD1735 NXM w/ DVI cable, Logitech Z3i 2.1 Speakers, Apple Pro Keyboard (wired), Apple Pro Wireless Mouse, D-Link DL-524 Router/WAP, Epson Stylus C80 printer on D-Link 301U ethernet printer server

      Everything opens quickly, usually one bounce on the dock and it's up and usable. I have spent a good deal of time moving my vacation photos (about 800-900) and music (about 3400 tracks) to their respective apps. Both iTunes and iPhoto still snap right open and are usable pretty quickly, although obviously startup scans of large libraries take a few seconds. Application performance is great, very smooth and pretty much what I expect of OS X. Pages and KeyNote are very responsive and stable, PhotoShop Elements 2.0 is the only laggard, as it is on any system.

      A big improvement for me is not having to turn off eye candy and little features to maintain performance. This is my third Mac, I've gone from an iMac G3 700 Snow w/Jag to an iBook G4 800 w/Panther to the mini I am currently running. For the first time I don't have to turn off dock animation or magnification, find a hack around transparency or turn off font smoothing to avoid those occasional chops that would happen to my other Macs. Finder is smooth and responsive and outside of the occasional delay with iDisk synching is vastly improved from Jag and even my earlier Panther experiences.

      Browsing my network, mapping drives on my Wintel box and even remote managing my DVR is perfection. I have the AE/BT option. AE immediately finds my Dlink DL-524 and works with it's WPA-PSK settings with no hassle. The Apple wireless mouse was found on first boot and OS X shows you a little 2 step pictogram so the OS can pair the device before it is even compeltely launched. BT performance is overall about the same, although it does not ship with the 1.2 firmware upgrade, which definitely made for smoother mouse tracking. Pairing with my Nokia 3650 is still a little wonky, but this appears to be my phone at fault as it pairs poorly with anything.

      The size is truly impressive and you have to see it in relation to the rest of your hardware to really appreciate it. It runs virtually silent all the time, even under moderate load the fan barely kicks up. The fan is a rotary blower similar to the ones in the new iMacs, although obviously a much lower profile and slightly different form factor. It does kick up during gaming, and while it makes more noise, it is more of a whoosh of air than anything mechanical or clicky. I think most of the noise is due to the shape of the exhaust vents more than the blower. At higher speeds you can definitely feel it moving some air, so I feel pretty confident the mini gets adequate air flow.

      I am the only one home right now at 7:45a.m., there is very little ambient or background noise to be heard currently, it is probably as close as my place gets to 100% silent and I can barely hear the mini at all, the fan is a whisper at best. I can hear the clock on the wall 20 feet away clicking more than I can hear the min

    4. Re:I've had my mini by bob670 · · Score: 1

      Well here is one you can help me with as well.... phuck yew! Nothing worse than a non-contributing AC with a bad attitude. While yes, the spelling errors are lame and I didn't notice that the "check spelling as you type" was turned off that is hardly call for you to be such as azz whole! Damn, there goes that spelling problem again.

    5. Re:I've had my mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing is worse than someone else doing YOUR work for free? No, fuck YOU. I take the time to help you look like less of a dipshit, and all you do is deliberately invoke the opposite image.

      Enjoy being unemployed when no-one will hire an illiterate fucktard with no sense of gratitude.

    6. Re:I've had my mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get OS CDs with all Macs including the mini, and since there's no serial, you can (practically, no comment about the morality) install it on as many Macs as you want.

    7. Re:I've had my mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that settles that then. Just have to wait for Tiger to come out ;)

    8. Re:I've had my mini by bob670 · · Score: 1

      I know you are CEO of your mom's basement, but in the real world your shit attitude won't carry you far. A clear sign you still live in your mom's basement and read Fuckedcompany everyday, only an FC douche-bag still uses the term fucktard.

  88. MOD UP by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That's pretty good info, if you are thinking about buying a Mac mini for an HTPC then the extra range for the keyboard could be of use.

    How did you find out what the built in bluetooth is like on the mini?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  89. If only they'd use fair conversion rates ... by Cpyder · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Okay, the upgrades were overpriced, but what gets me really upset is how they convert their prices into euros.

    If I want to buy a Mac Mini in Belgium, the entry price is 519 euro, as opposed to 499 in the US. At the current conversion rate (taken from XE.net/ucc), the "correct" EU price should be 381.68 eur.

    Even tough Apple is an American company, they're not going to convince me this price is because the stuff has to come from the US of A. And even then, you'd think that Apple, being a global company, should be able to get some volume discounts from their transport service.

    This goes for all of their products. If I want to buy a Powerbook, it's actually cheaper to take a plane to New York, buy it at the NY Apple store (if there is one, I suppose there is), put it in my bag and fly back to the Old Continent than to buy it here, be it from a store or from the Apple website.

    Come to think of it, anyone from Belgium or Holland who wants to buy some mac stuff? I'll go to NY, pick it up and pass the discount on to you. The more, the merrier.

    (yes, I know I won't be able to walk trough the airport with thousands of $ worth of stuff without being robbed (be it by criminals or by the import tax officers), and I know this doesn't include cab rides.. but you get the picture)

    1. Re:If only they'd use fair conversion rates ... by Fishd · · Score: 4, Informative

      And how much is VAT in Belgium? Try comparing the price without VAT to the USA price which is without their sales tax...

    2. Re:If only they'd use fair conversion rates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has been rehased all week, let this be the last time it has to ever be said; THE EURO PRICE INCLUDES VAT AND IMPORT DUTIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The US price does NOT include sales tax!

      The fact is, the price discrepency for the unit itself is non-existant.

    3. Re:If only they'd use fair conversion rates ... by sholden · · Score: 1

      Because Europe has no import duties, tariffs, or sales taxes.

    4. Re:If only they'd use fair conversion rates ... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Are you taking into consideration the 21% VAT? Because when taking that into account, the Mac mini has a 'base' price of 428.92, which might also include other costs I don't know about.

    5. Re:If only they'd use fair conversion rates ... by ivano · · Score: 1
      a gut retching 21%

      ciao

    6. Re:If only they'd use fair conversion rates ... by Cpyder · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ok, sure.

      US price without any tax : $ 499,00 - eur 381,41
      US price with 5% sales tax (in some states) : $ 523,95 - eur 400,48
      Belgian price excl 21% VAT : $ 550,35 - eur 420,66
      Belgian price incl 21% VAT : $ 665,92 - eur 509,00

      Okay, so the prices before tax aren't that different ($499 us, $550 eu), it's still worth the trip if you buy say a cinema display. (Which of course I will not.)

      I still think it's illogical to overcharge us "just in case the dollar should become more expensive". Firstly, I don't think that's going to happen in the next 4 years, and secondly I wouldn't mind if they'd adjust their prices. That's why currencies fluctuate in the first place.

      But indeed, point taken.. the prices before tax aren't that different anymore.

    7. Re:If only they'd use fair conversion rates ... by cocotoni · · Score: 1

      You can also take a shorter trip to say Switzerland, where VAT is just 7.6%. Makes quite a difference.

      Now, I don't know where the billateral agreements between Belgium and Switzerland are for the moment, but you might even get the return of the VAT when leaving .CH.

      And I swear I've seen components cheaper at retail stores in Switzerland then the wholesale price, without tax, I was getting in France.

    8. Re:If only they'd use fair conversion rates ... by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      It's 500$ in the US because we don't have the VAT and whatever tax the EU commision dreams up.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  90. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But even the gov takes actions against journalist in hopes they will reveil sources. It is all legal, and needs to be done to protect trademarks & trade secrets... anyway the person who passed the info along violated the NDA... and thats what apple wants names.

  91. Waiting for Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to get one now, but Tiger seems to have a number of really desireable features that I'm tempted to wait for its release. Any news on whether the mini will be fitted with Tiger when it comes out?

    Maybe my free one will have Tiger on it by the time it ships. ;-)

  92. They probably feel pretty good by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Considering that as others have noted Apple will refund the difference in price for upgrades and everyone got the faster drives by default, I imagine that most people are feeling pretty happy with Apple right now!

    Apple generally has very good customer service policies. I think about the only thing you could really complain about is the VERY short window for returns at the Apple stores (fifteen days).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  93. Apples-to-Apples Comparison by ThisIsFred · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ha ha, I'm making a stupid pun!

    I know these comments contain the inevitable PC-to-Mac price comparisons, but are they equivalent? One fellow found out that the RAM price difference is only about $29 (installed) if the identical type of memory is selected.

    So my question is this: How about if we compare a Mac Mini to a mini-ITX system? Now we're in about the same price range, with similar limitations on upgrades. Plus it's harder (impossible?) to get a suitably powerful processor in a mITX PC.

    Anandtech compared the Mini with a full-size Dell - they'd have to, there's no mini-ITX Dell systems that I'm aware of. I hope there's someone else here who thinks that's just stupid: "Hey guys, guess what? I just did a price comparison between a dual-Opteron system and a high-end laptop. The Opteron box is so much better for the price. Now excuse me while I place it in my laptop bag and take it on a business trip!"

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
    1. Re:Apples-to-Apples Comparison by prockcore · · Score: 1

      How about if we compare a Mac Mini to a mini-ITX system?

      Why would you do that? Might as well compare a Mac Mini to a PDA.

      mini-itx is not designed for desktops. It's designed for extremely low-power devices. You can run an entire mini-itx *including* harddrive on 20w total. Mini-itx can be completely silent. There's no fan on either the cpu or the powersupply.

      As quiet as the mini is, it still does have a fan, and for some reason Apple machine start out quiet and then get really loud after about a year. My Dual 1.24ghz G4 used to be quiet, now it sounds like a jet engine. My powerbook has its fan going all the time now.

      (To be fair, this powerbook is on its last legs.. the battery lasts about 5 minutes, the screen has that tell-tale corner-crease that all Pismo powerbooks get because of poor lid design, and the powerplug is showing signs of green oxidation inside the cord... again, something that those clear powercords are famous for).

  94. Needs to drop down to PS2/x-box level prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once a Mac comes out that is about as much as a Playstation ($150 - $200) then I think more people will consider them.

    Until that point they are pretty much expensive toys that look nice and make people say "Oooo.. what's this thing do?" and are reserved for the artistic eliete who think that having a Mac in their house is a good way to raise their status amongst their other Mac owning friends.

  95. Smart move by codeconfused · · Score: 0

    Hey this trick has worked many times for PC stuff. It's about time apple has caught on

    --
    Danger Will Robinson! You are now entering a condescending Unix user zone!
  96. Re:Upgrades are still over priced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry but I have to ask, how is it over priced for what you get? A barebones unix-likes computer that has insane processing power, with a great os. I can't see how its over priced a diy box with decent motherboard, dvi video, usb and firewire-400 (or iLink), case, processor, cd-rw (with dvd player), ram & a hd is going to put you well over the 499 mark...

    Whats wrong with you really.

  97. Re:Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must have something to loose it

  98. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jobs is sick and tired of leaking assholes

    No one should have to put up with that in their workplace. I think it violates OSHA or HIPAA something.

  99. Actually I wouldn't say he should have waited... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't think he should have waited. But if I were him I would have clouded the details a lot more.

    As it was it was really obvious that someone leaked big-time, and Apple wants to find out who - rather badly. If he had obscured the details more perhaps Apple would have let it go.

    I do think the kid will win the lawsuit though as he is as much a journalist as anyone.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  100. Reduced from X to Y by Anonymous+Cowherd+X · · Score: 1

    You may say this is just a pet peeve of mine, but when you say that something has been reduced, at least to me it's more logical to say that it's been reduced from X to Y, instead of saying it's been reduced to Y from X.

    Is RustNeverSleeps just not a programmer or are we dealing with a relative of Yoda's here?

  101. buying cheapest RAM isn't always best by Creepy · · Score: 1

    not all memory is created equal. Corsair memory has some excellent guides here

    First, though, the mini gets no advantage from DDR, because DDR requires 2 chips for full speed, so already 1 bad thing about the mini...

    I have no idea of what Apple is sticking in this, but most likely it's CAS 2.5, because that's the most common. I don't believe you get CAS 2.5, because I recall that depends on having too ram chips. Anyhow, in general, you want a low CAS number for better performance.

    1. Re:buying cheapest RAM isn't always best by mdpye · · Score: 1
      First, though, the mini gets no advantage from DDR, because DDR requires 2 chips for full speed, so already 1 bad thing about the mini...
      That's rubbish, DDR is about transmitting data on both the rising and falling edges of the clock signal. You're thinking about dual channel access, where pairs of modules can be addressed simultaneously, which obviously can't happen in the mini. But the benefit of dual channel isn't as large as DDR (which is a straight doubling of the front side bus clock) because if you don't need something from one of the sticks, but have a queue for the other then the cycles are wasted.

      MP
    2. Re:buying cheapest RAM isn't always best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First, though, the mini gets no advantage from DDR, because DDR requires 2 chips for full speed, so already 1 bad thing about the mini...

      To be sure, the Mini makes performance sacrifices, but no DDR is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself. If you can show the performance impact on applications as a result of the specification, that's another story. It's funny how people gravitate toward the use of specifications to somehow suggest bad or good qualities of things. I'm not sure if this is more commonly an American tendency, but it sure is prevalent on Slashdot.

    3. Re:buying cheapest RAM isn't always best by default+luser · · Score: 1

      In addition, note that the DDR on a G4 doesn't do anything. The G4 is constricted by a 64-bit 166MHz FSB. This is why most G4 PowerMacs had HUGE external caches (1-2MB), to mask the effects of this anorexic interface.

      I don't expect the performance of this system to be particularly impressive with a paltry 512K L2 cache.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  102. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That makes it sound much better.

  103. i'm sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but a corporate contract and NDA do not trump a journalist's right to not have to reveal her sources.

    wake up and smell the starbucks.

    1. Re:i'm sorry by Mant · · Score: 1

      What rights? Tradionally journalists (and is everyone with a web page a journalist?) have not revealed their sources, sometimes risking jail, sometimes going to jail.

      If they had a right not reveal their sources, why would that happen?

      However, I'm not aware of any particular legal right journalists have about not revealing source. Could you point out the actual source of this "right", where it is legally defined?

    2. Re:i'm sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have the right to remain silent.....
      What law did he break that he should have to tell Apple anything?

    3. Re:i'm sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He published trade secrets knowing full well that they were trade secrets.

      Additionally, the right to remain silent is reserved for people in criminal cases. This is a civil case.

    4. Re:i'm sorry by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Since when do you get read your miranda rights when someone sues you? Is that what the guy who serves the papers is supposed to do?

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    5. Re:i'm sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is really funny watching people argue who know nothing about law.

  104. You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Xugumad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, fed up with everyone saying "1GB of RAM is sooooo expensive". Yes, it is. Bad Apple.

    However, why do you want 1GB of RAM? I use a PowerBook with a 1.5Ghz CPU and 512MB as my desktop replacement at work, and have no problems. I've currently got Thunderbird, Adium (IM), iTunes, Firefox, Azureus and X11 open, with no noticable slowdown or disk swapping.

    Unless you're going to be doing something you know is memory intensive (Photoshop), you probably won't use anything more than 512MB. If you're that worried, and live anywhere near an Apple store, see if you can try one of these out, open half a dozen applications and see what performance you get.

    1. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Chirs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A linux kernel tree (without any object files) is about 230MB.

      Doing deltas between different versions is much faster if both versions are in memory. This means you need at least half a gig for the page cache, with nothing else running.

      For me personally, a gig is the minimum for development, and 2 gigs is noticeably nicer.

      My personal machine has a half gig though, as I don't do as much kernel work there.

    2. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by nagora · · Score: 1
      Unless you're going to be doing something you know is memory intensive (Photoshop),

      Well, a lot of Mac people do just that. And iMovie or whatever it's called isn't likely to suffer from lots of RAM either. On a PC I'd agree with you, but on a Mac I think you're more likely to get the use out of it.

      Can't hurt, and I can fit it myself (the mini is easy to open).

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    3. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by winkydink · · Score: 1

      2 words: "never swap"

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    4. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the Mini is not exactly intended for the kernel developer market...

    5. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by PhiberOptix · · Score: 1

      The mac mini only has 1 memory slot. Since you have to replace the 256mb stick, it makes more sense to upgrade all the way up, instead of buying 512mb, then six months later replace it again for 1gb.

    6. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by brunogirin · · Score: 3, Informative
      I can confirm that. I went to the London Apple store last week-end to see how a Mac would perform because I am seriously considering getting one. I had with me a USB memory key with a high resolution scan of a photograph I took: 5400dpi from a negative scanner. ie about 5000x7000 pixels, 17Mb JPEG, 113Mb in memory when uncompressed. So I wanted to see how a Mac would manage with a image like this. Here is what I did:

      1. Open in Photoshop on a PowerBook (all the G5s were busy) that had 768Mb RAM and already quite a few apps open.
      2. Make a copy of said image to crop scan border, meaning that I had 200Mb+ worth of image in memory.
      3. Make colour, contrast and other adjustments.

      The machine didn't even swap. Impressive.

    7. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by jkwatson · · Score: 0

      As a software engineer who uses heavy-weight tools (java + app server + IDE + local database), not having 1 GB of memory would be crippling. It is absolutely required for my work.

    8. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      People in the Mac mini's target market would not even understand what you just said, much less want to attempt it. 512MB is enough to run all of the applications Apple provides with the Mac, and that's all a lot of people are going to use. 256MB, however, is not.

    9. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by hawk · · Score: 1

      OSX isn't FreeBSD, but it's closer to that than to linux.

      I have 1G in the dual processor machine next to me. Even with outrageous options, such as -j12 on a buildworld (which drove the load well above 50 for an extended period), it *still* wasn't using swap.

      hawk

    10. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Chirs · · Score: 1

      Try recursively diffing two different source trees, one where the trees are preloaded into the page cache, and one where they are not. There is a serious speed difference.

      If the desired file is not in the page cache it won't force swap usage, it will simply run slower.

      Your example proves nothing.

    11. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by ninjagin · · Score: 2
      ... and I'm fed up with people telling me what I do and do not need. Are you omniscient? Can you see the future? Are you God?

      (If you are God, I'm really sorry about asking you to damn my luck last Friday at poker night, and I hope that you don't tell Santa because I'm really pulling for solid placement on the "nice" list this year.)

      ... ahem ...

      Inevitably, someone writes a tool or program that takes advantage of a lot more memory to do what it does. What might seem to be a perfectly acceptable amount of RAM under a given set of operational assumptions will inevitably become inadequate as the conditions that inform the assumptions -=change=- over time.

      The "640K ought to be enough for anybody" Gates quote (which I probably mangled a little) is a charming example of how assumptions for what people need become hokey and stupid in a very short period of time. I was digging through one of my old parts bins looking for an adapter last weekend and came across a bunch of 4MB sticks of RAM. I know for a fact that I've been replacing systems every couple years or so, and I seem to be increasing (doubling, for the most part) the amount of RAM I build into each new system.

      The programs change, the hardware changes and the amount of RAM you need changes. If I cram as much RAM into a box as possible, I make the machine more friendly to the changes that are going to happen whether I cram-the-RAM or not. Let's say that I decide to do a little coding on the box (not out of the question). Compiles are ALWAYS big memory hogs, and I want the quickest compile possible. Mo' betta RAM helps me with that.

      I want as much RAM as I can get NOT because I think "more is better", but so that I don't have to worry about RAM being a factor in any future software choice (or development activity) I may make for that system. I buy the beefiest stick of RAM so that when a system has to be retired, I have a stick that I can put into something else.

      Sure, my Mom or Dad will probably NEVER need more than 512MB. As for me, on the other hand, I don't want to "need" to buy more RAM to do anything that may come along. Since I can't see into the future, I plan for the change in demands ahead of time.

      (In the event that you are God, please bring back whats left of the hockey season and some world peace would be nice, too.)

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    12. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by ilsie · · Score: 1

      Garageband.

    13. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by jbtule · · Score: 1

      I have 1.5 GB of ram, and guess it's always fully utilized. Why, because this isn't windows and Mac OS X caches your file system with your unused ram. That's a significant performance boost.

    14. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      And note that the demo units in store all have photoshop on them and some reasonably large sample photos to play with. They also have Office XP installed, so you can really get an idea how it will perform under real usage.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    15. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by darrylo · · Score: 1

      "Virtual PC"

      I'm serious, although I won't go into the merits of buying a mini and then running Virtual PC on it. ;-)

    16. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Cederic · · Score: 1


      You are shitting me aren't you? I'm running on a 3 year old PC at home, and it's had 1GB of RAM since I bought it.

      At work 1GB is the absolute minimum these days - by the time you include operating system, two web browsers, email/calendar app, diagramming tool, word processor, text editor, a decent IDE, source code management tool and start running build scripts, recursive greps and performing other development tasks, even a gig isn't enough to prevent you swapping. And swapping slows you down..

      ~Cederic

    17. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 8 GB on my G5 and it pagesout on occasion. You cannot get an OS X box not to swap.

    18. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      A linux kernel tree (without any object files) is about 230MB. Doing deltas between different versions is much faster if both versions are in memory. This means you need at least half a gig for the page cache, with nothing else running.

      Huh? If you want to diff two kernel trees, you do it one file at a time. When you're done with file1.c, you move on to file2.c and will not need file1.c in RAM anymore.

      About the only scenario I can think of to really want both trees in RAM from your description is if you are picking files from the two trees randomly and repeatedly for comparisons. Why would you do that?

    19. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Do you use OS X?

      I'll tell you what. I have a 400Mhz G4 with 512MB ram. I use it for programming, 3D visitation, and photo editing (but not video editing or DVD encoding). I've been thinking about upgrading to 1Gb, but I just can't justify it. I never run into issues with memory swapping. Maybe it's just that my system is so slow that it never runs into a problem, but I'd doubt that'd be much different than on a mac mini.

      If I were buying a mac mini, I'd start with 512, and then upgrade from there if I needed to. If a 512MB chip costs $75 and a 1GB costs $225, then the odds that you'd need to upgrade would have to be 66% before you were justified in starting out with 1GB.

      if x is the probability you'd need to upgrade then using the relation:

      75(x)=(225-75)(1-x)

      (75 is the added cost if you later need to upgrade, 225 - 75 is the added cost if you upgraded but you didn't need to)

      and solving for x you get

      x = 2/3

      Speaking from personal experience, I expect that the probability you will need to upgrade is less than 66%. But if you're not sure, you could try out a mac mini (or some equivalent system) with 512MB at an apple store and see what you think.

    20. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      6 months? HA! Mac hardware improves pathetically slow compared to x86. What the hell is gonna change in 6 months necessitating 1GB? I bought my 1.2GHz Athlon with 512MB and Win2k. A box with 512 and WinXP is still serviceable. Personally I'd get a Gig. Now for a Mac mini, which is slow but the OS needs less memory, I'd still get 512.

    21. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by sagekoala06 · · Score: 1

      what i didn't like is that i did do that just yesterday in fact, at my local apple store. about this mac listed it as a 1.4 with 512 of ram. I had it open a few things (i randomly clicked a few things on the dock like word power point and pages) and the bouncing icons were off ... and they kept going and going ... at least 30 seconds passed and nothing happened besides those icons bouncing. I really wanted to see pages for whatever reason so i had to force quit everything else and then relaunch pages and up it popped. You can justify it however you want it made a bad first impression. not to mention the annoying guy that kept bugging me "thats our new mac mini that was just released" "yeah i know. thanks, but I'm just looking" "well have you seen our new ipod minis" (*hands one out to me*) "yep i have, I'm not really interested though, I'm just looking" then he randomly tries to sell me a 15" powerbook with an isight for whatever reason. (note to self if you ever buy an apple product buy online)

    22. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      I don't think it's so much that no one needs a gig of RAM. It's more that the mini is not aimed at people who need a gig of RAM.

      I do not need a gig of RAM. I have 384 on my eMac and it runs just fine and dandy. It was on 256 for a while, and wasn't perfect but was fine unless I was using Photoshop.

      A friend's wife, however, is a graphic artist who runs Photoshop and Illustrator simultaneously. She needs a gig of RAM. Apple, however, does not especially want her to buy a mini. Apple wants the graphic artists and others who need a gig of RAM to buy a PowerMac. If all those people bought tricked-out minis, Apple would lose a lot of sales of its most expensive machines, and Apple doesn't want that.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    23. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it might work for you, but it doesn't for me! After opening a few GLTerms, iTunes with a 4,400 song library, Mozilla with 50 or so active windows, and my ~15Gbyte mailbox with Thunderbird, my VM size is about 11 GBytes. So you're telling me 512 MBytes is enough? I'd say you're wrong. Just Thunderbird by itself uses much more RAM than that!

    24. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      That was probably more to do with disk contention. Which is why it kinda sucks they put a notebook drive in the Mac Mini. Or at least, I'm going to use this as a poorly validated excuse to complain that they used a notebook drive, because I haven't replied to most of the responses I go, and I feel someone at least should get a reply!

    25. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      um...

      Well if Apple doesn't want people to have a Gig of RAM, why did they make it an option?

      It looks like they do want people to be able to get a Gig of RAM, and you have absolututely no idea what you're talking about.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    26. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gcc on the G4's and G5's is a complete memory pig! All of the programs I use take about 4-10x as much memory as they do with gcc on x86's. I use Thunderturd and Firefoxy on my PB w/ 2G ram, and it is painful. To the original poster, you're full of crap if you claim 0.5G is enough for a Mac.

    27. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Windows *does* do that. Indeed, people often criticise Windows for caching *too much* and swapping applications out.

    28. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just run the appserver and database on a separate machine. It's crazy running them on the local machine if you have a server available (which most developers do).

      A Mac mini with 512MB is what I'm buying for my Java development.

    29. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's why you buy a PowerMac for serious dev work.

      For my home machine, which I do a lot of coding on, 512MB is fine. The appserver, database, and (sometimes) build scripts run on the server that is tucked away in another room. A nice, quiet, iMac is on my desk running a browser, IDE and CVS tool (and not much else). I could probably survive with 256MB of RAM with this setup.

    30. Re:You do not need 1GB of RAM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish. I was using an iMac with 256MB RAM for months, and it was fine. Even Anand Lal Shimpi says that 512MB is the "sweet spot".

  105. Re:Upgrades are still over priced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The G4 doesn't have anything remotely close to insane processing power. It has too little RAM, a processor that barely competes with a 2GHz P4, a 4200 RPM HDD, and an immutable video solution that is insufficient for decent-performance high-resolution Expose.

  106. Got marketing part right perhaps... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    As others have noted previous buyers get price pretection, and even faster drives without asking.

    But that's only the margin part of your argument.

    Otherwise I don't think it's impossible this is a marketing ploy, if so then at least they did it in a way that does not really hurt the consumer. In any case it was really effective to get a second wave of buzz going around the Mini.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  107. Apple math by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    Upgrading from 256MB to 1GB of RAM =
    upgrading $40 to $120.
    $120-$40 = $80
    $80 + insane tax on the stupid = $475
    $80 + huge tax on the stupid = $325
    what a bargain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111oneone

    Upgadeing for 40GB to 80GB =
    upgrading from $20 to $40
    $40-$20= $20
    $80 + tax on the stupid = $90
    $80 + tax on the stupid and gullible = $50

    1. Re:Apple math by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wherever you can find an 80GB 2.5" (a.k.a. "laptop") drive for $40, let me know. I've got an older PowerBook that could use a hard drive upgrade, and the cheapest I've seen an 80GB drive is $115. (Even assuming Apple gets a 50% discount for volume, that's still $57.50)

      And as 40GB drives are $64, paying only $50 for the upgrade sounds like a good deal to me. (Only $1 'tax on the stup[id and gullible'.)

      As for memory? Yeah, Apple has always charged WAAAAY too much for memory. (I even see 1GB DIMMs for $85 in places.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    2. Re:Apple math by 0BoDy · · Score: 1

      moreover when has a vendor ever charged reasonable prices for a bto addon?

      --
      Can I be a Luddite too?
  108. 256 is ridiculous by siskbc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've said this before, but I have to disagree. I've worked with Macs with 256MB of RAM, and they were fine. I wouldn't want to run Photoshop with 256MB RAM, but I wouldn't want to run Photoshop on one of these anyway!

    I've used Macs with 256MB that ran fine too. 5 years ago. Not now, no way.

    You're granting that you can't run anything on these things (like photoshop), then say "why would you want to?" Well, why not? You should be able to. The guts of the Mac mini is pretty similar to a powerbook (comparable chip, graphics, etc). I have 512MB in my powerbook, and THAT is often too little.

    As to the people saying you need 1GB, what for? I've got a flatmate that does graphical work on a PowerMac with 512MB, and it's fine for everything except Photoshop

    Answered your own question, photoshop for one. Also games, and people who multitask heavily (ie, me) or work with memory intensive apps for work (also me).

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:256 is ridiculous by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you are using an example of a notorious memory hog (Photoshop). For people using every day productivity apps, 256 is perfectly workable, if not particularly snappy.

    2. Re:256 is ridiculous by siskbc · · Score: 1
      Yes, but you are using an example of a notorious memory hog (Photoshop). For people using every day productivity apps, 256 is perfectly workable, if not particularly snappy.

      Read the anandtech review. 256MB OK for one app, not great for two, and more than that is basically impossible. And I'm talking Mail and Safari here, not Photoshop.

      That's kind of the point of the computer these days - it's not acceptable to have a situation where the OS doesn't respond when more than one low-memory program is running. When you also consider that 512MB (a not-so-expensive upgrade) is quite acceptable for running almost anything, the decision is easy. 256BM should never be used for OS X.

      Basically, which would you rather have: a computer that can do pretty much anything for $569 (with memory upgrade), or one that can barely run two small applications for $499? Come on. And as anandtech points out, does Apple really want that to be the first OS X experience to people it's trying to win over? That is the point of the Mac mini, after all.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    3. Re:256 is ridiculous by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Why should I read the review, I have a G3 iBook running 10.3.7 in 256Mb sitting here next to me... I can *see* how snappy it is or isn't.

  109. Dell crushes Apple Mac Mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume by crush you mean "To press between opposing bodies so as to break or injure." [dictionary.com]?

    Of course :)

  110. Price Protection by ContraB · · Score: 1
    I ordered my Mac Mini from the Apple Store January 21. 1.42GHz, 512MB, 80GB, Bluetooth + Airport Extreme. Needless to say, it hasn't shipped yet.

    But yesterday I got email from Apple saying they'd reduced the cost of my order to reflect this pricing change. Excellent!

    Does anyone know if MacMall would reduce the price of a pending order like that? My guess is, no.

    8X DVD writing (rather than 4x) is a pleasant surprise, too.

    Thanks, Apple!

    --

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Much like a newborn puppy...
  111. UK Store prices are way wrong by philkerr · · Score: 1
    I've just checked out the prices from the UK web store, something must be wrong.

    1 Gig RAM is showing up at £561.53 and the combo WiFI and Bluetooth kit is £103.88.

    These prices are way out, be careful if you are placing an order!

    1. Re:UK Store prices are way wrong by acb · · Score: 1

      Perhaps upgrades in the UK are selling well enough for Apple to have decided against lowering prices for the moment?

      Will the US store sell to UK customers? Will US Mac Minis run off 240v?

  112. TCO by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    If you consider the market these are aimed at, the length of time it would take a Windows box to become unuseable due to spyware/crapware, and the cost savings of not having someone "fix" it every 6 months to keep it from "slowing down" it is a better deal.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  113. Good buy? You bet. by MattHaffner · · Score: 4, Informative

    For completeness, you need to add iLife '05 for the Mac. That retails around $79, but I bet you'd be hard pressed to find a suite for a similar price in the PC world.

    You also forgot to configure the DVD/CD drive option the same on the Dell. When you do, it adds $35.

    What's still different in the technical details? The mini includes Firewire and a real video card. You need to add $110 to the Dell to get those. Now you're up to $685 + $35 + $110 = $830.

    The only technical details the Dell has now over the mini is that the (minimum optional) video card is better (I think) than the 9200 in the mini and that the 4700 has 6 USB ports on it instead of 2, if you care to have that many.

    Is the mini a good buy? Uh, well, technically, yes. Unless you're going to quibble about raw processor performance.

    Look. At this level of machine, it's a new game. Make your choice based on what you want. Price is not an issue anymore. Instead, sit down and ask yourself whether you want to try:

    * A new user experience. Yes, there will be a learning curve if you've never used one. There's no Start button. There's one menu bar. It will take you a few days. Big deal, likely.

    * A new level of security--whether through design or obscurity, your choice. This will save you a few days. Each month. No joke.

    * Lower number, but higher average quality (typically) app selection. What do you use? What can't you live without? A lot of good stuff is ported. Some good stuff is not. There are sometimes great alternatives, sometimes not.

    Apple's giving those at this price point the chance to make a personal selection that has very little to do with financials. Enjoy making it.

    1. Re:Good buy? You bet. by bnenning · · Score: 1

      For completeness, you need to add iLife '05 for the Mac.

      Already included.

      Look. At this level of machine, it's a new game. Make your choice based on what you want. Price is not an issue anymore.

      Exactly. It's down into the iPod price range, and will be wildly popular for the same reasons. An "Apple tax" of 20% on a $2000 tower may be prohibitive. For a $300 music player or $500 system, it's not.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    2. Re:Good buy? You bet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misunderstood. He knew iLife was included with the Mini - the point is that it's something you're not getting with the Dell.

    3. Re:Good buy? You bet. by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      A new level of security--whether through design or obscurity, your choice. This will save you a few days. Each month. No joke.


      No way. I call BS here. If you're talking Win98 or WinME, maybe, but winXP is pretty solid for a non-clueless user who takes a few basic precautions and never uses IE except to download a real browser.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    4. Re:Good buy? You bet. by MattHaffner · · Score: 1

      Really? You do that and then never run anti-virial or anti-spyware software again? Really? And come on... you couldn't say that a year ago before SP2 was released. At least not without saying "who takes a few basic precautions, dumps $50-100 for a good firewall, and never..."

      OK, so a few days a month is an exaggeration for the aggressive, knowledgeable user. Fine. But the fact is that all that crap is out there pounding on your firewall, sitting in your e-mail, and potentially lurking in every download you'd like to try out. You make one slip-up and let your guard down, and you're going to be spending some time cleaning things up.

      The fact is that MS is behind the curve on providing basic security. They may be catching up, but how much of everyone's time and money has been spent playing every-man-for-themselves in the meantime? How much crap was written to exploit the trivial ease before all these patchwork fixes were rolled out? How much less crap would be out there if such glaring holes never existed in the first place? How many fewer assholes would be writing such crap nowadays if it had been harder from the getgo? If the security model was really about security from the day XP was released? There's an army of viral/worm-writers out there now that cut their teeth on the easy stuff. What's next up on the annoyance front? I can't wait to see. (And yes, I used sarcasm).

      OK, sorry, that was a little diversion and not really related to my first assertion except that the whole "modern" environment was created by little attention paid to (or cared for) thinking ahead. Maybe the small share is the reason--and maybe not--but OS X is ahead of that curve since any threat is in the future. Sounds silly, but it is a marketable advantage.

      The same crap is pounding on my firewall and is in my e-mail, but it doesn't do a thing if it gets "in". If it ever does start doing stuff, a lot of basic protection is there already. Pre-emtively. In the meantime, no anti-viral, no anti-spyware running here. No mind-share devoted to thinking about them at all, in fact. 90% of apps don't need InstallShield or the equivalent to dump crap in your system space. They're all self-contained. Drag & drop install. Done. It was a different model from day one and it makes a difference.

    5. Re:Good buy? You bet. by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      The fact is that MS is behind the curve on providing basic security. They may be catching up, but how much of everyone's time and money has been spent playing every-man-for-themselves in the meantime?

      Agreed. Win9x/ME were truthfully impossible to secure (not to mention you had no option but to run as root at all times). Security was simply not a concern of Microsofts, and we are all paying the price.

      I was just trying to point out that their systems are far more secure than ever before, and that despite being the biggest target of malware, it is now possible with reasonable precautions and good backups to connect a windows machine to the internets and not have it immediately compromised. There are very few measures that have to be taken other than what you should take with any computer, regardless of the OS.

      Most of the most seriously b0rked Windows machines I have had to fix were b0rked by spyware and hijackware intentionally installed by the user. It doens't matter how secure the OS is if the user is going to be happily installing malware.

      Not trying to get in a flamewar here, just felt that you were spreading the equivalent of FUD.Overstating the shortcomings of Windows achieves nothing. I know you were exaggerating for effect/humor, but the fact is that Windows XP is a pretty good OS for ordinary use (If I had any data I really cared about I would not keep it on this machine, however). I don't like having to use Windows, but until a couple of Windows-only apps I need will run on Linux (or I suppose OS X), I'm pretty much stuck with it.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  114. .edu Pricing by MattHaffner · · Score: 1

    As you might expect, .edu pricing dropped as well. Without any accessories, a maxed-out mini is now only $1,050. Freaking amazing.

    My only gripe is that they couldn't find a way to squeak at least a 9600 in there. Sigh...

  115. Insightful? by .Spyder78. · · Score: 1

    perhaps I'm the only one, but I thought the sarcasm was quite funny.

  116. Currency Conversion Madness... by acomj · · Score: 1

    Currencies fluctuate. The Dollar is falling against the euro right which should help make things cheaper over there.

    Since these probably aren't being made in the US,

    The real conversion would be chinese currency -> eruos. China pegs there currency to the dollar thus the euro should buy more, so in some ways you are right.

    However:

    Companies usually set a price and stick with it.
    People would go nuts if the price fluctuated every day with currency values.

    European car makers aren't doing so well in the US with current conversion rates (they hedge this but that gets too complex for now). So the companies suck it up and take the loss to keep the price competetive. I'm betting apple isn't as profitable as it wants to be on these minimacs in the US. Its sucking it up to keep a certain price point.

    US people have to pay a sales tax of 5% (well it varries state to state) above the cost of the machine.

  117. Re:Interesting how fast wrong info spreads uncheck by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Which is one of the main reasons that I think blogs suck and why bloggers aren't journalists. Too much unchecked/unverified information.
    Yeah, that happens in the real news world, but nowhere as common as the 'blogosphere.'

  118. How big is the dell? by denjin · · Score: 1

    Find us the price on a tiny dell ITX box or whatever and get back to us.

  119. Server memory by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    Apparently this is 'ECC' RAM instead of 'non-ECC' like the $226, and it's also 'Registered' instead of 'Unbuffered,' and '128meg x 72' instead of '128 meg x 64'.

    That is the type of memory that servers use.

    ECC is error correction code. PC's usually use regular non-ECC, non-parity memory. The chipset of the computer needs to support the special ECC or parity type memory in order to use it.

    The "128 meg x 64" vs. "128 megs x 72" tells you the chip configuration that the memory stick uses. The "128meg" part tells you that each stick uses individual chips of 128 MB capacity. On normal PC memory, there are 8 of those individual chips on the stick bringing the total memory to 1024 megs, that's 1 GB. As far as the "64" or "72" part, that's the bit width of the memory stick. PC's use 64 bit sticks and servers use 72 bit sticks. On a PC's memory stick, since each chip is 8 bits, 8 memory chips x 8 bits means a total of 64 bits. Server memory uses an extra parity bit for each byte which brings the total to 9 bits. So a server memory stick has 9 individual chips on it- each chip is 8 bits wide and there are 9 of them- 8 x 9 = 72.

  120. Mac Mini (xMac) by larrypatrickmaloney · · Score: 1

    Wow! I have always dreamt of owning a Mac. I have wasted literally, years of my life fiddling with POS generic Intel boxes with MS-Windows issues.

    Could my dream be coming true? A Macintosh I can JUSTIFY to myself?

    After work, I'm running to the local computer store just like when I was a kid, and checking out one of these new Mini Macs.

    http://www.FreeMiniMacs.com/?r=14470252

    1. Re:Mac Mini (xMac) by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Think about what you just said:
      A Macintosh I can JUSTIFY to myself?
      right after this:
      I have wasted literally, years of my life fiddling with POS generic Intel boxes with MS-Windows issues.
      "Years of [your] life" are worth much more than even a PowerMac G5, let alone the Mac Mini. If that's your reasoning, you should have "justified" a Mac a long, long time ago.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  121. Be careful when comparing prices by greppling · · Score: 1
    Of course, the VAT has already been mentioned (and at least for Germany, if you buy a computer in the US to bring it to Germany, you have to pay the equivalent of VAT at customs).

    Not so obvious may be the differences in included warranties. Remember that you get a free 2-year warranty in EU country. That's worth quite a lot, especially for notebooks.

  122. I'd agree with you if.. by .Spyder78. · · Score: 1

    ...the Mac Mini wasn't aimed at the entry level Mac user. I've read that Apple is aiming this at iPod owners who might be turned onto owning a Mac but always thought it was too expensive. These people (along with the entry level users) won't be doing extensive photoshopping (if they even know what that is).

  123. Tiger upgrade? by dschuetz · · Score: 1

    I know we don't have a firm release date for Tiger, but I think it's supposed to be out before June or so. Does anyone know what the upgrade policy will be for Mac Minis? That is, if I buy a Mini now, will I have to fork out another $50 or $100 when Tiger ships? (in which case, I'll just wait...)

    1. Re:Tiger upgrade? by Beefslaya · · Score: 0
      When I purchased my Dual G4, I got Jaguar, and I registered it.

      I did recieve a free upgrade to Panther, however that was less then 3 months.

      I wouldn't count on it to happen twice. I'm waiting for Tiger to by my mac mini.

    2. Re:Tiger upgrade? by javaxman · · Score: 1
      If you _want_ to wait for Tiger, and you can... well, like any computer purchase, if you can wait, you probably should. You'll get a better deal when you finally do buy.

      Major OS releases are not free. Buy a Macintosh now, and it'll have OS X 10.3 on it. You'll get free updates to 10.3 via Software Update ( people are still getting security updates for 10.2 and 10.1 even ), but if you want 10.4 when it comes out, you should expect to pay the full price. You should expect to pay the full price for a major OS release, shouldn't you?!? Did Dell send you a copy of XP when it came out?

      Personally, I don't see the new features in 10.4 as being anything _most_ folks should hold out for, unless you're a developer, in which case you might want to consider a G5 and a developer program membership which will get you a beta of 10.4...

      By the way, I'm not saying it's going to ship later than June, but Apple's made it clear that it's in no big hurry to ship Tiger. They may ship it later. All they've committed to is sometime this year.

    3. Re:Tiger upgrade? by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      Major OS releases are not free. Buy a Macintosh now, and it'll have OS X 10.3 on it [...], but if you want 10.4 when it comes out, you should expect to pay the full price.

      Generally, yes, but I know that they're giving free/cheap upgrades to iLife '05 for people who bought hardware after a certain date, before the '05 package started to ship. So I wasn't sure if Apple was going to do something like that for Tiger (or if they'd done it for Panther).

    4. Re:Tiger upgrade? by javaxman · · Score: 1
      Generally, yes, but I know that they're giving free/cheap upgrades to iLife '05 for people who bought hardware after a certain date, before the '05 package started to ship. So I wasn't sure if Apple was going to do something like that for Tiger (or if they'd done it for Panther).

      Apple does commonly offer price protection, but it's limited. I'm pretty sure it's officially limited to products announced within 10 days after your order ships?? That's the date your product ships, not the date you ordered, which is really kind, and sometimes you get great deals from Apple by ordering something that's later replaced ( I picked up a nice dual G5 by ordering a single G5 right before a PowerMac update, but that kind of thing is fairly rare, and I did have to pony up a _little_ extra for the upgrade ).

      I'm sure we could find the answer on Apple's website somewhere, and ( as I noted ) sometimes they're more generous than that stated policy, but... if you bought a Mac mini now, there's no way you'd get a free/cheap OS X 10.4 in June. If you magically knew 10 days in advance when Tiger ships, you could plan your order then, but... just wait until the ship date is announced if that's what you want to do. Or order a mini now, and get Tiger later for $120 or whatever it is.

  124. Remember people who the Mac mini is aimed at. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I would agree. When I first got my 12 inch PowBook, I got it in it's stock configuration (two things I would never buy from Apple, despite being a Mac zealot: RAM and an Airport Base Station), and it ran 10.3 fine when doing relatively low impact tasks. I'd usually have Mail, Safari, Adium, and iTunes running, sometimes Word as well. Snappy? Not exactly, but perfectly usable, certainly far faster than my ancient B&W (upgraded to a 500 Mhz G4 and 384 Mbs RAM). People on Slashdot seem to be forgetting this is a machine aimed at low-end users, people who will be using the iApps and some word processor; most of the buyers of the Mac mini will never run Photoshop, Dreamweaver, InDesign, or even iMovie or iDVD. 256 Mbs of RAM is enough to get by for a low-impact user in 10.3, even with a "slow" 2.5 inch HD. That said, yes, for games and anything much more than basic internet and word processing (which, again, is all that most people will be doing), 256 Mbs begins to quickly show its limits. Within a month of getting my PowBook, I dropped in a 512 Mb chip, and now the little sucker screams at PS, Jedi Knight, and can run without rebooting for a week or more no problem. However, during those weeks with the stock 256 Mbs, I never was saying "goddamn, Safari and Mail and Word run like crap!"

  125. You may not NEED it, but it sure helps! by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    The reason you need a lot of RAM is because its the cheapest way to make your system faster. OSX uses unused physical memory for disk cache, which helps make your system snappy.

    It also cuts down on the amount of CPU needed, as stuff can be computed and stored in memory so it doesn't need to be computed again. This cuts down the time you wait for the computed result, which is good for all computers. It's also of particular use to notebooks like yours, as hitting RAM instead of CPU saves battery life.

    With that said, it is indeed expensive. I'd probably buy the gig from crucial.com and install myself...

  126. Re:I wonder about Dell purchasers by leejor · · Score: 1

    I wonder about Dell purchasers who check back a couple hours later after placing an order, only to find they have played the Dell Pricing Roulette Wheel. Maybe the price is lower, maybe higher.

    At least, I bet Apple won't raise their prices.

  127. Mod Parent Down - Misinformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, what about VAT? Son of a gun, add in VAT and you come up with around 500 euros. So the price seems pretty fair to me. Don't blame Apple - blame your government for the confiscatory taxes that they charge.

  128. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by Mournblade · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Jobs is sick and tired of leaking assholes..."

    Then he should quit consuming food that contains Olean.

  129. Hard Drive? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
    Here are some questions that I have had about the Mac Mini. Maybe someone more familir with Apple can help me out here : )

    Does the Mac Mini really come with a slow 2.5" laptop hard drive? This has been the only thing that has made me leery of a purchase.

    If it does come with a slow hard drive, could someone stick there own 3.5" 7,200RPM hard drive in place of it?

    If you can put your own standard hard drive in, does the Mac Mini come with install disks or would you have to go out and buy a new copy of Mac OS X?

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    1. Re:Hard Drive? by bnenning · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does the Mac Mini really come with a slow 2.5" laptop hard drive?

      Yes, although some buyers are reporting that their drives are 5400rpm (compared to the 4200rpm of most laptop drives).

      f it does come with a slow hard drive, could someone stick there own 3.5" 7,200RPM hard drive in place of it?

      Almost certainly not due to space limitations. There are 7200rpm 2.5" drives which you could probably use, but in most cases it will be more convenient to use Firewire external drives.

      If you can put your own standard hard drive in, does the Mac Mini come with install disks or would you have to go out and buy a new copy of Mac OS X?

      They have real OS X install CDs.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    2. Re:Hard Drive? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Anandtech had a feature on the mac mini; you can look them up and see for yourself that you won't be able to fit anything more than a 2.5" drive in there. Hell, they were lucky that they could fit in a new 512 ram chip with a heat spreader! The other thing to watch out for is Mac's custom special drive interface. I think you can find some other drives that fit the interface and the space they give you, but, as usual, expect to pay out the nose for it.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    3. Re:Hard Drive? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      I'd think that due to its having USB 2.0 and firewire (IIRC) ports, it would be a relatively simple task to connect a drive of any size with an external housing. That's one of the reasons I want to get one myself, because while it has its expansion limits, I *can* install anything I need to use on the external ports.

      And for that matter, even if I did, I would still have a nice tiny computer to work with (just stack 'em).

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    4. Re:Hard Drive? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Oh, and yes, it comes with a copy of OS X, according to Apple's website.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    5. Re:Hard Drive? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Sure, you could add tons of extra storage with Firewire _or_ USB 2.0. However, I was thinking more along the lines of the hard drive that the base OS is installed on.

      On my laptop with a 4,800 RPM hard drive, I notice that Linux and MS Windows XP both run a lot slower then a similar speed desktop with a normal 7,200 RPM drive.

      If I get this Mac Mini, it will be the first Mac I ever bought for home use. I didn't want to be dissapointed by slow performance becaue the hard drive is slowing the system down.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    6. Re:Hard Drive? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Is this custom special drive interface for 2.5" drives something new to the mini? I ask because I have a PB, and I was able to upgrade it's HD to 80 GB without any special interface.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    7. Re:Hard Drive? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Its just what the anandtech people said; I could be mistaken on that. It would be neat to upgrade, although I suspect that larger drives would be quite expensive in that form, and possibly give off considerable heat.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

  130. You're talking about the chip's latency by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    That's not totally true, you can generally run underclocked RAM at a higher access time(the time the computer waits for the RAM to set down to a state).

    You're talking about its latency, not its frequency. We're talking about frequency here (using PC2700 memory vs PC3000 memory in the Mini).

    The original poster didn't state anything about latency, he specified the stick by its frequency. He said that by using a PC3000 chip in the Mini, its memory speed would be faster. That is false.

    What you are talking about is the chip's latency, and the latency does not depend on its frequency. I'm sure you've seen chips marketed as "PC2700 CL 2.5", or "PC2700 CL 3" on Crucial's website before. They both run at the same clock speed but the latency is different, the chip with the latency of 2.5 will be faster.

    If a user buys just any PC3000 stick and puts it in his Mini thinking it will be faster than a good PC2700 stick, he'd be wrong. They'd both be running at PC2700 speed once he installs them, but the good chip will most likely have a lower latency than the cheap chip.

    1. Re:You're talking about the chip's latency by gabebear · · Score: 1

      yep "latency" is the word I was searching for, but you were the only one only evidently talking about frequency.

      You said in both your posts that the memory wouldn't be any faster, which to me implies throughtput. Acutally you said "Putting in PC3000 or faster won't make the memory speed be any faster" which to me deffinately implies throughput. Lower latency RAM can throw more bits down the same clocked bus then RAM with higher latency, to me that makes it faster. Ram that is underclocked can be run with a lower latency. On my old iMac(100Mhz bus) going from CAS3 to CAS2 RAM gave it about a 5% speed bump for RAM access.

      The original poster was under the impression that the Mac mini used ECC or Buffered RAM, in which cases latency makes a much bigger difference in the actual throughput of the RAM. He also said that using higher rated RAM will give you a more stable system. It's more stable because you are underclocking it. Underclocking RAM allows for cooler operation and ability to set a lower latency(timing).

    2. Re:You're talking about the chip's latency by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      yep "latency" is the word I was searching for, but you were the only one only evidently talking about frequency.

      To be accurate, the original poster was talking about frequency too. He specified the memory by it's "PC" designation (PC3000) which is completely determined by its frequency. Its latency has nothing at all to do with that designation. You can have PC3000 and still have a miserable CL4.

      The original poster was under the impression that the Mac mini used ECC or Buffered RAM, in which cases latency makes a much bigger difference in the actual throughput of the RAM.

      The original poster was under a lot of incorrect impressions. But I'm not blasting him for it since he's not the one trying to tell me that I'm wrong.

    3. Re:You're talking about the chip's latency by mako1138 · · Score: 2, Informative

      See this. It appears that DDR performance is not affected by CAS. I do remember the PC133 days, though, and CAS did make a difference back then.

      Also, running RAM at lower than its rated speed doesn't necessarily ensure stable operation at a lower CAS latency.

  131. Computing Circa 1983: It's all in the extras. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is going to make bank in extra devices, due to their surge in popularity. Hence the reduction on marign for these machines.

    Its a reversal in the trend over the past 20 or so years to put your entire system into one box.

    For example, the Commodore 64 is/was arguably the best selling computer of all time. $300 got you a usable computer, with BASIC ROM, that plugged into your TV. You had to pay extra for software, games, and disk drives, joysticks, paddles, etc. So if you wanted to go brand-name (not really an option then), you'd easily top $1000 for a complete rig.

    The major advantage that CBM had over IBM was that you didn't have to plonk down a huge amount of cash at one time for a system. Instead, you pay a small amount for the base model and add what you need. Dig up an old issue of Compute! in your Uncle's basement, and look at the ads, if you don't belive this.

    So the Mac Mini is a repeat of this marketing model. You've got a small machine that can barely be upgraded beyond the release specs, so extras need to be external devices. If you bought the base model Mini, you may eventually want more hard-drive space or wireless networking.

    Sure, any slashdotter knows that virtually any USB/Firewire product is up to the task, but does the average user know this? Probably not. Going name brand on extras is just a security blanket for users that Apple is going to bank on.

  132. Not true for 512 MB option by sjonke · · Score: 1

    Actually, in the case of the 512 MB option, Apple's price on that is quite reasonable at $75. The best I could find elsewhere was only a few dollars less, and then you had to add shipping, making the 3rd party price actually higher than Apple's upgrade price and you'd have to install it yourself. I suppose you might be able to sell the old 256 MB module then, but is that really worth the effort? The 1 GB option is an entirely different story, even with the reduced pricing.

    --
    --- What?
    1. Re:Not true for 512 MB option by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I suppose you might be able to sell the old 256 MB module then, but is that really worth the effort?

      I'd strongly advise against doing this, mainly because that 256 stick will come in handy if you ever need to troubleshoot hardware problems. Being able to swap in the factory installed RAM will save headaches and time.

      So, you're completely correct. The 512 MB option is very reasonable, and there's one less thing to keep track of the extra RAM.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  133. A nice machine but not 64 bit by oconnorcjo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I would grab one but it is not a G5. I refuse to buy anymore 32 bit machines now that one can buy commodity x86/apple 64 bit chips. The future is 64 bit. I have not replaced my 32 bit machines but I don't intend to buy anymore 32 bit computers.

    --
    I miss the Karma Whores.
    1. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by Beefslaya · · Score: 0
      64 Bit would be nice.

      I don't think they've discovered a way for the mini macs and powerbooks not to have a thermo nuclear melt down from the heat generated.

      Client of mine has a rack full of G5 Xserves, and you can feel the heat on the other side of the server room door. And that's with it's own AC system.Besides, the mini mac was designed for the average "Windows End User" afraid of anything other then Microsoft products, and they don't need a 64bit web browser, or office suite.

    2. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Ah another clueless customer... Do you have one machine with more than 4 Gigs of ram? If no... there is only one single reason on x86 to go the 64bit route, you get more than a measly handful of general purpose registers. The x86-32 bit architecture is one of the worst architectures there is register wise, AMD64 eased that problem to a certain degree given that the iron runs in 64 bit mode.
      Guess what, the PowerPC, even the sort of predecessor the 68000 already had a lot of general purpose registers from the beginning. So do you need more than 4 gig of ram? No? then why do you want to go the 64 bit route on PPC?

      Guess what, you just fell into AMDs marketing hype...

    3. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1
      So do you need more than 4 gig of ram? No? then why do you want to go the 64 bit route on PPC?

      Well because eventually Apple is going to only sell G5/G6/G7's and eventually only sell 64 bit apps which won't run on 32 bit systems. Sure this won't happen tommorow but be sure that it will happen in a few years. The same goes for the x86 market. A 64 bit machine can run 32 bit and 64 bit apps with no problem but a 32 bit comp CAN'T RUN a 64 bit application. I could not care less about ram but I do care about FORWARD compatibility. Of course the way things are going with software, more than 4 gigs of RAM should be common in the next couple of years to run games and high-end programs.

      To sum up:
      a 64 bit system is a more flexible system that will transfer smoothly into the future when many "off the shelf" programs are 64 bit and I rather not have to check box labels to see if they are "compatible with older systems" (like what happened when the 286 was becoming/became obsolete).

      No programs written today are compatable with a 286 machines and 286 16 bit machines are esentially "junk" but an old 386 or pentium machine can still be usefull as a linux box or a Windows web browsing box.

      I have not replaced my 32 bit machines but any new computers I buy are going to be 64 bit. Whether I buy Apple or x86.

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    4. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by Jayzz · · Score: 1

      You are not buying a 32 bit machine because you fear they will only ship 64bit binary in a few years? 1. They wil ship both 32 & 64 bit versions, adding a 32 bit version won't cost them anything. They can even make on binary file contains both and load appropriate version when it's excuted. 2. The day they decide to drop 32 bit support will come much later than when you feel your machine is too slow to run those shiny 64 bit only programs.

    5. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1
      You are not buying a 32 bit machine because you fear they will only ship 64bit binary in a few years? 1. They wil ship both 32 & 64 bit versions, adding a 32 bit version won't cost them anything. They can even make on binary file contains both and load appropriate version when it's excuted. 2. The day they decide to drop 32 bit support will come much later than when you feel your machine is too slow to run those shiny 64 bit only programs.

      I think you are deluded.

      1. There is little incentive for companies to have developers port applications from 64 to 32 bit (for any long period of time).
      2. In 1995 when Win 95 came out (MS's first 32 bit OS), almost overnight everything became 32 bit only. Just wait until MS is only selling a 64 bit OS and I would think Apple will be even happier to go this route (considering it is such an incetive for people to buy new hardware).

      It is only because Intel is dragging thier feet (because they banked thier future on the Itanic and now have to follow AMD's lead instead) is the writing not as obvious as it was in 1992. Apple has not quite transitioned OSX to 64 bit (or will it be OSY by then) but when Apple and Microsoft finally do provide a 64 bit OS, it will be more obvious to you as well.

      As an offtopic side-note about "Moores Law"- If you have not noticed, "Moores Law" has slowed down tremendously in the last fifteen years. It used to be "doubles in speed every 6 months" to "doubles every year" to "doubles every 18 months" and now it is "doubles every 2 years". I am still happy running a machine that I built in 2000. A 64 bit machine I might build this year will probably be good to the year 2010 or longer.

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    6. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by guet · · Score: 1

      There is little incentive for companies to have developers port applications from 64 to 32 bit

      On the contrary, there is little incentive right now to use 64bit only operations, and little opportunity in fact, you have to jump through hoops to do it. That will change (in a few years at the earliest), but when it does, programs won't have to be 'ported' to 32bit, they'll probably just be compiled using different 32 bit libraries (for math etc) and run slower. As the parent said, this can be handled quite easily with the bundle format, that's what it's designed for.

      In fact a bundle could include an x86 binary too, if the OS handled that platform. If all APIs, libraries etc were available (big if) for that platform, the developer would just have to do a recompile with a different target for that as well. That'll never happen though.

      In 1995 when Win 95 came out (MS's first 32 bit OS), almost overnight everything became 32 bit only.

      Apple is not Microsoft; programs written and compiled for 68k
      processors still run on OS X, and will do for the forseeable future.

      Going by your logic, you should be happy with your 32 bit machine bought now in 5 years, as G4 macs happily run software written in the early 90s or even the 80s -- for a different OS, on a different hardware platform.

      In 5 years your position will be reasonable, right now I think it's a little pessimistic.

    7. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Expect that at least the next 4-5 years you will get 32 bit versions of anything... Even Windows64 on the AMD/Intel side is sort of problematic and probably will only be serviced as a sideoffer (64 bit OSes usually carry a 32 bit thunking layer around)

      The reason why the move from 16 bit to 32 bit was carried out so swiftly back in the early nineties was. Because programs ran into the 16 bit barriers left and right and every developer hoped that he could move to 32 bit in an instant, add to that the fact that the consumer mass market happened way after the switch to 32 bit, and even then a 16 bit thunking layer was needed at least for 3 years.

      The situation nowadays is totally different. 64 Bit windows is still in unstable mode, Linux is there but some problems still are problematic, there is no actual need for the programmers to have 64 bit, because the mem boundary will not be reached for another 5 years and there is a huge market of old 32 bit systems which wont be phased out before 2010, so dont expect any serious abandoning of the 32 bit systems before 2010-2012. There is more marketing into 64 bit than any sanity on the client side of things. Servers are a different game though... But I admit the marketing of AMD hit intel on the ignorance side... And one thing finally AMD fixed which Intel should have fixed in the mid eighties, they finally added more general purpose registers, which will help VMs and compilers tremendously.

    8. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Besides that the move from 16 to 32 bit had other motivations. First win95 was the first windows with a good gui, the move to 32 bit finally brought a plain memory model instead of the hated segments. The next problem was that programming against x86 16 bit systems was god awful and nobody really wanted to do it because you constantly ran into the segmentation barriers etc... The current situation is totally different, there wont be any really big 64 bit impact on the client side before 2010, and before that it is no big deal to do multi platform compiles, after all we are not talking about having to change lots of code for the upgrade from 32 to 64 bit (the mem issue is does not exist currently and people usually dont use data type boundary tricks anymore to save a few processing cycles)

    9. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1
      Apple is not Microsoft; programs written and compiled for 68k processors still run on OS X, and will do for the forseeable future.

      but OS X programs do not run on a 68k AND THAT IS THE POINT.

      People keep arguing that 32 bit will be fine (which is true for a little while still) but what is the ADVANTAGE? If you spend a couple extra dollars, you get all the plusses of a 64 bit machine and a future you can be happy to embrace but if you buy a cheap 32 bit machine what are the plusses?

      The G5 IMac looks like a better deal when one considers it is just as loaded as the mini and it obviously comes with a monitor and is a b4 bit machine and has all the improvements that IBM has added to the G5 generation of CPU's (which I am not as familiar with).

      On the x86 side, it only costs a hundred bucks more to get an amd athlon 64 system which has:
      1. more general purpose registers.
      2. capable of handling far more ram.
      3. Faster in most benchmarks (and that is in just 32 bit mode let alone the 64 bit mode. In 64 bit mode some math intensive apps are shown to be ammazingly better)
      4. better memory controller.
      5. A 64 bit system compatible with future software while still being compatible with existing software.

      So yes I could buy a 32 bit machine but what is the ADVANTAGE?

      People argueing with me in this thread keep saying "the world won't change so soon" or "what do you need 64 bit for" but NOBODY has tried to give ONE good advantage to buying a 32 bit machine over a 64 bit one. I on the other hand have mentioned several good reasons to go to a 64 bit machine. As a buyer, I see only upside to going 64 bit and no downside so that is my choice. If anyone wants to still buy 32 bit machines, it is no skin off my back. My policy is to look toward the future and not the past. If somebody can come up with a real legitimate reason NOT TO go 64 bit, I will respond back but otherwise, I am done with this thread. I did not write my original post to try to convince people of the merits of 64 bit. I only mentioned that it seems like a good deal but too bad it was not a G5 or I would pick one up (and I got modded as flaimbait).

      My "final answer" to all this is... "WHATEVER".

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    10. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people who have amd 64 machines and from what they say and what I have seen, there are no real issues. The only problem is finding many applications (at the moment) that are 64 bit but all the 32 bit programs run just fine (including plain old win xp)

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    11. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by guet · · Score: 1

      : o

      a real legitimate reason NOT TO go 64 bit

      Well, G4s are significantly cooler, and significantly cheaper, so for now they're quite a good choice, particularly for a small machines. But yes, as you say, on all technical counts, it'd be nice to have a G5 in there, they're just expensive right now. On the x86 side the difference is more pronounced because of the registers. Given their history with OS X (still supports G3s) I doubt they're going to dump G4 support anytime in the next 10 years.

    12. Re:A nice machine but not 64 bit by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      I have a 64 bit machine as a workmachine in my current job... Running 64 bit linux there... there is no advantage there for me as an application developer currently... You simply currently do not run into the memory boundaries of 32 bit, and the increased number of registers on the Intel side (the PPC since day one always had a high number) is only interesting for people who do assembler stuff (compiler builders, vm programmers, game programmers)

  134. Now I'll never be able to stay away. by hungsolo · · Score: 0
    They keep lowering the prices on their products! Why do they taunt me so?

    /me off to the local Apple Store

  135. All the kvetching by guet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If anyone is considering buying this machine to try to compile a Linux kernel tree (or any application/os that size) on it regularly, I think you need to rethink the purchase. Same goes for heavy video editing.

    It's a budget, CONSUMER, box, it's not even the 'pro' consumer model (the iMac). The point of the parent was that perhaps 4% of the computing populace would even notice 1GB of RAM in their machine (as opposed to 512MB), which makes all the kvetching about the price of 1GB on Slashdot seem a little specious.

  136. Microsoft FUD force by soldeed · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Bill Gates must really be worried if he has this many minions out desperately trying to convince windows users NOT to switch. You can just see them sitting around the table up in Redmond thinking up negative things to say in online forums. Hmmm.. Your efforts MIGHT save you a coule of points of market share.

    1. Re:Microsoft FUD force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all of us who think the Apple's mini lapH^H^H^ computer sucks must be EVIL Micro$oft astroturfers trying to convince Windows users ON SLASHDOT not to switch. There is no such thing as Windows/Linux/non-Apple-BSD/etc users thinking on their own that Apple's products are over rated and are not as great as the fanboys say they are.

      By that reasoning you must be one of Apple's PR fanboys who writes long winded jerk-off pieces about the company's products in an attempt to convert those you dub "PeeCee Luzers," have another account dedicated to spreading the gospel about how you "were" a "PC user" and Apple "convinced" you to "switch," and are retarded enough that they have to put a warning for you not to eat their brand of music players.

    2. Re:Microsoft FUD force by qqaz · · Score: 1

      First, I do not use any Microsoft products, so I'm not sure what that has to do with anything.

      Second, is what I said not true? The Mac Mini has a small, slow laptop hard drive, a tiny amount of RAM (doesn't it use laptop SODIMMs too?), and minimal expandability. Sounds like a shitty laptop, right? Wrong...they're selling it as a desktop!

      --
      sup :cool:
    3. Re:Microsoft FUD force by soldeed · · Score: 1
      First, I do not use any Microsoft products, so I'm not sure what that has to do with anything


      does'nt mean anything, maybe your're repeating FUD you heard elsewhere and believe it to be true


      Second, is what I said not true?


      NOPE Hard drive is plenty fast and the ram is standard DDR SDRAM. And as for flamebait?
      I don't post anything I don't believe to be true. You're naieve to think that microsoft would not conduct a campaign of lies against competing products!

    4. Re:Microsoft FUD force by qqaz · · Score: 1

      Somehow, you've managed to make even less sense with this post. I'm impressed.

      --
      sup :cool:
    5. Re:Microsoft FUD force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to look at it in the proper context. They are selling it as an alternative to the *incredibly* shitty $500-$800 desktops sold by Dell et al, which feature crappy components and an operating system that invites spyware, viruses, frustration, and general loss of productivity.

      Assume you a consumer who needs a new computer, but you do not have the knowledge or time to put together a custom system by buying the cheapest components and then get it working with a stable and safe operating system. You could buy used, buy a low-end system from a Wintel OEM (and either replace the OS or be ready to put up with hell), or buy a Mac mini.

      I believe you would be most happy and productive with the Mac mini.

  137. I'm not buying (yet) by melted · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'll wait until Tiger comes out. They'll be shipping Tiger with this thing, and I'll save $129 by not buying it down the road. In fact I'll save $79 more because it comes with iLife '05 which my iMac G5 doesn't have yet (and yeah, I'm gonna put Tiger on it, too). There you go, $500 computer, $200 in savings on software.

  138. It's the same in south america by SoTuA · · Score: 1

    Here in Chile, minis start at $429000. At today's rates, that's like US$740. For the basic model.

  139. and the future direction is known by hawk · · Score: 1

    Add to that that we pretty much *know* that interest rates will be rising in the near term in the U.S., which will make the dollar stronger wrt the Euro. Given the points you mention about fluctuating prices, Apple would be foolish not to take this into account.

    hawk

  140. Apple Rebates by StrandedOrg · · Score: 2, Informative

    After seeing this I called the 1800 number and got a rebate. It was the easiest thing I have ever done with a computer company. The Apple Store offers price protection for products ub to ten day AFTER SHIPMENT, not ordering. The policy and the phone number to call can be found here [apple.com]. I called last night and they've credited my card. PRICES The Apple Store endeavors to offer you competitive prices on current Apple products and selected Sale and Apple Certified Reconditioned products. Your total order price will include the price of the product (on the day of shipping) plus any applicable sales tax and shipping charges. Apple reserves the right to change prices for products displayed at the Apple Store at any time. Should Apple reduce its price on any shipped product within 10 calendar days of shipment, you may contact Apple Sales Support at 1-800-676-2775 to request a refund or credit of the difference between the price you were charged and the current selling price. To receive the refund or credit you must contact Apple within 14 business days of shipment. http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/salespoli cies.html#Apple%20Prices

  141. my moderation suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1, Presents Opinions as Fact.

  142. come shop in the US of A!!! by pzarecta · · Score: 1

    The minis are small enough that you can get them through customs w/o anyone blinking an eye. (You might have to take it out of the shiny packaging, tho.) Spend your hard-earned euros here!!! Seriously, NYC has never been so cheap for Europeans.

  143. You are gonna bitch about a by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    few hundred dollars?

    C'mon man, this is a cool machine. Price is not everything. Look past the hardware and look at the package deal.

    Yes, this is a damn good buy. You get a solid OS, nice included applications all in a nifty little package with style and size unmatched in the PC world.

    Also consider the value of the software added. If you actually pay for software, the package Apple ships in the box makes up for the price difference alone!

  144. Re:Interesting how fast wrong info spreads uncheck by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

    Which is one of the main reasons that I think blogs suck and why bloggers aren't journalists. Too much unchecked/unverified information.
    Yeah, that happens in the real news world, but nowhere as common as the 'blogosphere.


    You've got that backwards. Just because it's easier to expose errors in the blog world, doesn't mean that they're actually more prevalent than in traditional news media.

    Most bloggers back up every claim they make with a link to their source. You don't get that from any network newscast.

  145. Or perhaps sales fucking suck already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EOM

  146. 512MB is plenty for most users and uses by javaxman · · Score: 1
    The reason you need a lot of RAM is because its the cheapest way to make your system faster. OSX uses unused physical memory for disk cache, which helps make your system snappy.

    While this is absolutely true, the difference between 256MB and 512MB is much more noticeable than the difference between 512MB and 1GB.

    Beyond 512MB, you're unlikely to really notice any difference when using a single application, which is what most users do most of the time. Only real power users with large data sets, server/client processes, and multiple apps running will even notice a need for more than 512MB. This is an observation comming from administering OS X machines at a small business.

    If you're editing video, you clearly will benefit from 1GB, but if you're just surfin' the web, reading email, typing an occasional letter and using iTunes, like _most_ users ? Don't bust the bank, 512MB will do you fine.

  147. disposable computer? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    That's $575 for what's almost a disposable computer.

    I'd be happy to "dispose" of your Mac Mini -- or your $575 -- for free, any time!

  148. I was probably the only one on /. to hear this... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Even if you consider the lowering of prices, the fact remains that you could spend $400-$500 to bring the Mac Mini up to a reasonable configuration by today's standards. IMHO, this doesn't go against their business model.

    I was probably the only one to hear this, but on KCBS, the San Jose station, ripped the cost of upgrades on the Mac Mini. I expect Apple people were listening to their radios and considered this and thus you see a quick about face.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  149. Re:Interesting how fast wrong info spreads uncheck by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    More often than not, I just see bloggers linking to the same news articles instead of mirroring them, which is annoying because online news articles do change, and they do suffer from link rot.

  150. Price of Mac Mini in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The $499 Mac Mini cost you Rs.38000, i.e. ~ $863 !!
    The price is from Apple Center, Bangalore.

  151. I got a $30 refund by e1en0r · · Score: 3, Informative
    I ordered my BTO Mac mini the day it was available and received it on Monday. The invoice email states:
    Should Apple reduce its price on any shipped product within 10 calendar days of shipment, you may contact Apple Sales Support at 1-800-676-2775 to request a refund or credit of the difference between the price you were charged and the current selling price. To receive the refund or credit you must contact Apple within 14 business days of shipment.
    so I called them up about the bluetooth + wireless option that I'd added, and they credited my account the $30. It took all of 3 minutes to do. Painless.
  152. What planet are you posting from? by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    > offer a "cheapish" mac and make a thin margin on it.

    Apple has NEVER sold a product at a margin anyone would ever call 'thin.' I doubt they would do a closeout at an outlet store under %25 over cost of production. Normal pricing at Apple is more like 50-200% markup.

    > reap the fat margin on the upgrades.

    That they sure do. Look at this announcement, the dropped the price on their 1G upgrade by the street price on a 1GB stick of DDR-400. They are now getting $325 (plus keeping the 256MB stick they would normally have installed) for a stick of memory that you can get from A list brands for at least a hundred less. I haven't seen price gouging like this since Radio Shack was dominant in the industry.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:What planet are you posting from? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Another thing, similar to RadioShack: The Apple Store wants your zip code? WTF?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  153. Bringing Pince-nez into the 21st century by whyde · · Score: 1
    I accidentally dropped my pince-nez.

    Perhaps you should look into using Pierce-Nez instead. You'll never drop your glasses again. Or, if you do, you'll have bigger issues than which pins got soldered incorrectly.

  154. funny then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About Apple mentioning how nicely this little box could sit on top of your development PC and work with a KVM switch.

    The Mac Mini is perfect for a developer who wants to add OS X to his list of supported platforms, or even just wants to give Macs a try for the first time.

    Not everyone interested in a second development box can just casually throw several thousand dollars at it.

  155. Re:Is this really a good buy? Yes it is, damnit! by gsfprez · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Price for iLife 05 on Dell Dimension 4700....uh.. there is no price for iLife 05 on theDell Dimension 4700.

    No, instead you get years of heartache with driver issues with your camera and a corn-you-fscking-copia of bastard-ass photo organization applications that do fsck-all for you actually organizing, printing, and making books from your pictures.

    Why do you think that they finally came out with printers with CF cards and fscking monitors on them? I'm sure easy to use software on windows was the reason!

    I'm so sick of this debate, i'm not even going to go into trying to use Pinnicle's sucky DVD-put-together software. That has to be the most grabtastic pile of poo i've ever used.

    Every time i hear this Cheaper Dell thing.. i aske people if they had to buy two cars - and one was twice as expenive as the other, but the cheaper one meant you needed to run your own cables to the throttle and brake lines and steering box, and they you had to drive-by-wire with bicycle handbrakes - would the car that was 1/2 as much still be worth anything?

    btw: did i mention spyware, adware, viruses and trying to setup wireless networks without a CCIE on Windows vs. the more expensive Mac mini?

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  156. expensive by phsdv · · Score: 1
    I hear CPU's are real hard to make from scratch

    It is also very expensive. You probably need around $1M just to buy the mask set and a batch of wafers. At least you end up with more than 10K of CPU's

  157. could also be .. by torpor · · Score: 1

    .. that their successful marketing campaign was so well done, that they were able to take the numbers from their sales systems and negotiate better terms with their suppliers.

    really, apple is how you sell computers, when you're not doing it the county-fair-beigebox-hunt way ..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  158. BEST OS ON THE PLANET by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    Here's the rub,
    there is no best OS on the planet you phewls. There is a best OS for a certain use, and that is still subjective. Do u need a RTOS? OS X may not be the best choice for that. Do you need security ? Maybe windows isn't for you. Do you want a pretty operating system that yyou won't have to mess with ? try OS X. Do you want to do it yourself and explore cutting edge open source software? Linux is the great for that ....

    --
    music lover since 1969
    1. Re:BEST OS ON THE PLANET by HAKdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      While I generally do agree with your comment, you should note that OSX can be very comparable to Linux if you set it up that way, seeing as how the OS has a Unix core, has a terminal app, an X11 server, a BASH shell, and a number of other open-source tools and apps that are very common to the your average *nix user. But, as you stated, OSX can be damned pretty OS that doesn't require a lot of mucking around by the end user, but the options are there.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
  159. UK Price *Increases*!? by SRCShelton · · Score: 1

    Hmm - I'm sure that only a few days ago, the UK price to upgrade to Wifi+BT was about £90.

    It's now £143(!)

    Compare this to the US upgrade price of $99, or £52.56. Also bear in mind that this UK price is, as with the US price, before tax...

    A mistake, surely?

    1. Re:UK Price *Increases*!? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Obviously, they're taking a cut in profit in the US, so they're just passing on some of the pain to you in the UK! Thanks for subsidizing our discount! =)

      I'm sure it's really an unintentional mistake and that it will be sorted out soon enough. Have you contacted them to complain about the discrepancy?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  160. Re: not just painted plastic by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

    "I was very surprised to see that the case truly is aluminum, and not just painted plastic."

    I'm guessing your new to the Mac platform. Well, get used to it! Apple's CEO and their engineers/designers pay attention to every last excruciating detail.

    The guy who posts the prices and descriptions on the online store, well thats another story.

  161. Price elasticities by cagliost · · Score: 1

    "Perhaps Apple actually listened to people complaining about overpriced upgrades." No, Apple would have researched and found that the price elasticity of demand was such that if they lowered prices, they could sell more and increase overall profits. Just like Amazon realising that instead of spending money on TV advertising, they could just drop their prices, sell more and increase overall profits.

  162. Free(er) Mac Mini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does this mean they will pay me to take one off their hands???

    http://www.freeminimacs.com/?r=14319773

  163. One Step Forward, One Step Back by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

    I went ahead and did a bit of reconfiguring on both ends:

    [$981.00] Apple Mac Mini
    1.42GHz PowerPC G4
    512MB DDR333 SDRAM - 1 DIMM
    80GB Ultra ATA drive
    4x SuperDrive (DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    Wired Keyboard & Mouse Set - U.S. English
    56K v.92 Modem
    Mac OS X - U.S. English
    3yr warranty

    [$996.00] Dell Dimension 4700
    2.80GHz Intel P4 520 (HT, 800FSB)
    512MB DDR400 SDRAM - 2 DIMMs
    80GB Serial ATA drive
    16x DVD-ROM / 16x DVD+/-RW dbl-layer
    Keyboard, two-button mouse
    Intel PRO 10/100 Ethernet
    Windows XP Professional
    3yr basic warranty

    Not much price difference between the two, although with Dell you have the option of buying a 15" E153FP flat panel for $100, or a 17" 1704FP for $219.

    That being said, I think it's a matter of what you're looking for. Windows boxen have a bigger pool of software (apps, games) and a wider range of hardware upgrades at more competitive prices; they also offer applications with a consistent UI (Microsoft apps). Of course, their Achilles heel is security........

    With Apple, you're a bit more limited in terms of software and hardware upgrades. However, the software is far more secure than Windows, and the interfaces tend to be more consistent across the board.

    1. Re:One Step Forward, One Step Back by White+Roses · · Score: 1
      The Dell also has a rather larger footprint than the Mini. It's an issue for people with limited space, for people just buying a second machine, or something that will fit in with the home theater system. The smaller footprint Dimension starts at a higher price than the Mac Mini, and just goes up from there. Yes, I know that such considerations as ergonomics and style are tertiary to most geeks, but the target audience of the Mini isn't most geeks. And yes, it might just be the Lady Mac, from what I hear. But it's still price competitive, no matter how you slice it.

      I'll conceed the "pool of apps" point, but consistent UI, no. I have yet to find a Mac app, third party or otherwise, where command-Q doesn't work to quit the app. On Windows? Sure alt-F4 works . . . mostly. But sometimes it's crtl-F, then X, if you want to actually save your work (admittedly, I dropped that app as crap). And I ran into an app where alt-F4 inexplicably brought up the shutdown dialog instead, like the app didn't trap it at all. Commercial software no less.

      Security, out of the box, Mac is going to be better. Most sites have covered that ad nauseum, but if some pedant wants me to find links, e-mail me. However, Windows and the associated apps can be made arbitrarily secure as well. I've seen some very well locked down Windows boxes. But they weren't locked down by the average home user, and I don't think Windows can be locked down effectively without a large amount of user education. It comes down to how much time you want to invest in getting and keeping your box stable and secure. Me, not a lot of time. I have more interesting things to do these days.

      Apple's software and hardware pool are, yes, limited. But how often do Windows users really upgrade hardware? A random (small) sampling of people sitting near me at work puts the number rather low (less than 10%). And these are programmers, with a higher than average GQ. And while a selection of 15 different MP3 players, or word processors is nice, what if 10 of them are crap, and of the remaining 5, 3 are outrageously expensive? If you look at the signal-to-noise, as it were, on Mac apps, it's much lower than on the Windows side. Though that, again, is probably due to the smaller pool. Perhaps the crap Mac apps wither and die faster? With a smaller user base, that might be true as well.

      But all these considerations aside, the best advocacy there is is to get someone to try one. Three programmers from my random sampling have been to the Apple store, tried the Mac Mini, and subsequently have ordered Macs (two iBooks and a Mac Mini). Why? Because inside of 20 minutes, the user experience convinced them to part with upwards of $500 of their hard earned cash. These are Windows users. Two of them are iPod users. I don't think I have a better argument than that.

      Yes, it is a matter of what you're looking for, spot on. A lot of new users are looking at . . . price. So, the Mini gives them a non-Windows option (Linspire not withstanding, though I hear it's good), that does what they want, and more, out of the box, in a secure environment, with minimal extra initial outlay.

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
    2. Re:One Step Forward, One Step Back by MattHaffner · · Score: 1

      Not much price difference between the two, although with Dell you have the option of buying a 15" E153FP flat panel for $100, or a 17" 1704FP for $219.

      Careful, that's the upgrade prices from the default 17" CRT. The prices are a bit more expensive compared to not getting a monitor at all (add ~$45). They are still a bit cheaper buying with the computer than buying a monitor alone from Dell--which is an option for your mini as well--but not by a lot.

      Although I don't think there is a one right now, Apple occasionally has deals on monitor purchases with CPU units. It's not going to bring it down in this range, but the Apple monitors are quite high quality. You're best shopping elsewhere if you want cheap. You now have that option with a low-end Mac.

      However, if you're really going to buy a whole computer, take a careful look at the low-end iMac G5's versus a mini + new components, unless component separability is very important to you. There's going to be a noticeable performance jump (especially 3D gaming, if that's part of yer schtick) between a G4 + 9200 and a G5 + GeForce FX 5200 Ultra.

    3. Re:One Step Forward, One Step Back by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Not much price difference between the two, although with Dell you have the option of buying a 15" E153FP flat panel for $100, or a 17" 1704FP for $219.

      The Dell will also completely spank the Mini in performance, with a CPU about 30% faster, more than 4x the bus speed (actually making use of that DDR RAM) and a hard disk probably 50% faster.

  164. In addition to that... by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

    The case for the mini looks good enough for a home entertainment PC. I'm not going to put an ugly black or beige box next to the TV

    I priced an equivalent Shuttle for that purpose and arrived at about the same price as a Mini. That's not including the effort required to put the Shuttle parts together and install the OS. The Mini comes with everything ready to go...

    So, yes, the Mini is a good deal when comparing apples with apples...

    1. Re:In addition to that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how will you connect the mini to the TV?

    2. Re:In addition to that... by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      The case for the mini looks good enough for a home entertainment PC. I'm not going to put an ugly black or beige box next to the TV

      That depends on your definition of a "home entertainment PC." I agree that the case looks good enough for a HTPC, but the Mac mini is not powerful enough for high def and needs more external accessories to be a "decent" HTPC, IMO.

      To be a decent HTPC, I think the mini might need:

      1. M-Audio Sonica Theater for surround sound and digital out (4.8" x 3.1" x 1.2")
      2. Elgato EyeTV 200 for TV tuner/PVR (8.3" x 6.1" x 1.4")
      3. An external hard drive might be needed, since SDTV eats about 2 GB per hour. On the other hand, video can also be burned onto DVD.
      All together, that doesn't seem that bad to me. The Mac mini is so darned tiny and the Sonica Theater can probably be stacked on top of the EyeTV. But the Mac mini will (probably) never be able to do HDTV and Blu-Ray/HD-DVD.

      I priced an equivalent Shuttle for that purpose and arrived at about the same price as a Mini. That's not including the effort required to put the Shuttle parts together and install the OS. The Mini comes with everything ready to go...

      Shuttle also sells complete systems with all the parts already together and OS already installed. They even sell Media Player XPCs with surround sound, digital output, TV tuner/PVR, and memory card reader inside the box. These Media Player XPCs run MS Windows Media Center Edition 2005 and include a remote. The cheapest one starts at $950 and includes a 3Ghz Pentium 4, 512MB RAM, 80GB HD, DVD/CD-RW combo drive (Dual layer DVD burner for $32 more), keyboard/mouse, and all that other "media center" shit I mentioned before (surround, digital, DVR, remote, etc).

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  165. then stop taking our fingerprints... by lixlpixel · · Score: 1

    I went to NYC several times - not only to shop but to enjoy this wonderful city.

    But I'll never go there again, given that they'll take a picture of me and take my fingerprints now.

    I've avoided to get into trouble and have my fingerprints taken all my life, why on earth should i have to give them just for hopping over a puddle of salty water?

  166. Had mine 5 days now, no chg in price for mine by Tangential · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought mini w/512 and wifi, $653. Got it last Friday and love it.

    Went to the apple site and went thru the order process again out of curiosity. Same price.

    I feel better.

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
  167. Don't forget, people are buying the Apple OS. by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    Apple has always charged a premium for Apple OS. And people have paid it. They want that OS... and an awful lot of people love Mac OS. It's easy, and how many viruses are out for the Mac?

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  168. Hell yeah. by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    When Dell makes a box of this size and slickness, with WiFi and BT built right in, so that it would look good sitting on my mantle next to my plasma screen, feeding it media, while I control it wirelessly from across the room, we'll talk.

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  169. Readable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  170. Truck! by Trillan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm pretty sure I could drive a truck over the Dell and crush the Dell. That doesn't make a truck a better computer.

    1. Re:Truck! by tntguy · · Score: 1

      That's because it's much better as a high-bandwidth data transmission device!

    2. Re:Truck! by vbdrummer0 · · Score: 0

      A truck be better than a Dell? It might.

  171. Re:kitchen computer::Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not taunt Mac mini

  172. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by rjung2k · · Score: 1

    Those "Apple" ads are for an Apple third-party retailer, not for Apple.

    Compare the ads to Apple's corporate web site. Totally different style and aesthetic.

  173. Re:Interesting how fast wrong info spreads uncheck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most bloggers back up every claim they make with a link to their source.

    Really? Got a link for that?

    You don't want to know what I really think. :)

  174. G3 keboard and mouse? by Redundant+offtopic+t · · Score: 1

    "A question: can a Mac mouse/keyboard from an old G3 system be used with the Mini?"

    If they're usb, yes. If adb, a couple companies sell adb to usb adapters. I use one (sorry, forgot the manufacturer) to connect my ancient extended II (IMO, the best keyboard ever made).

  175. Not a chance by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    The G5 uses a large case and watercooling to control the temps of the high-clockspeed PPC 970 processor. How are they going to sqeeze that kind of cooling into a case the size of a CDROM drive?

    1. Re:Not a chance by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      The water cooling is only on the top speed G5 Tower. The configurations with slower G5 cpus don't use water cooling.

      See here.

      But your overall point is still valid.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:Not a chance by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      The G5 uses a large case and watercooling to control the temps of the high-clockspeed PPC 970 processor. How are they going to sqeeze that kind of cooling into a case the size of a CDROM drive?

      By using a 1.4Ghz G5.

    3. Re:Not a chance by Squozen · · Score: 1

      And a G4 is faster than a G5 at the same clockspeed, so it's kinda pointless... :)

    4. Re:Not a chance by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      But the G5's 64 bit architecture would allow the Mini to address more than 2 Gb of RAM, which would come in handy if anyone ever manufactures 4 GB sticks of PC 2700 RAM.

      Uh, nevermind.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:Not a chance by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      And a G4 is faster than a G5 at the same clockspeed, so it's kinda pointless... :)

      I think you'll find the G5 is actually a touch faster at the same clock speed than a G4. However, that's not the only benefit the G5 brings - by far the most important improvement it would carry is a ~500Mhz bus (compared to the G4's 166Mhz), improving all aspects of system performance (and actually making some use of that DDR RAM). There's also the 64 bit part, but that's mostly a wank (particularly for the Mini).

      I've no doubt a 1.4Ghz G5 would be quite a bit faster than a 1.4Ghz G4 at anything that didn't fit into the CPU's cache (ie: real world usage).

  176. Rackmount kitchen appliances by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Is it bad that I (seriously) think that's a good idea?

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Rackmount kitchen appliances by Maserati · · Score: 1

      No way, burn your toast and you set off the fire-suppression...

      I've been in this business too long.

      Wait, it'll play havok with with the AC...

      and it's still under a decade, oh God I'm gonna hafta retire a ditchdigger

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  177. Time is money and money is time by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    You will save that extra hundred bucks the first time there's a new Windows spyware or virus that you don't have to kill precious hours of your life trying to eradicate that you could have spent instead making money, sleeping, playing with your kids or doing something enjoyable.

    I have owned both types of machines for a loooong time. Mac upkeep time/energy is literally an order of magnitude less than Windows upkeep time/energy.

    Why are people consistently completely unfathomably incredibly blind to the hidden costs?

  178. Please help with what is needed. by aliquis · · Score: 1

    So the mac mini is 4700 sek @ 1.25GHz, 256MB ram and 40GB HDD. An 1000 sek upgrade to something more hot might be worth it but then all my programs would be on a slow harddrive so getting an external faster one might be a better choice. So what is needed?

    * DVD-R option, since I don't want an external to and a drive + case would cost as much anyway.

    * 512MB ram, either new stick and sell/get rid of the old 256MB or upgrade.

    * Apple keyboard and mouse.

    * USB soundcard, I want digital output and microphone support. But which ones work with the mac?

    Also I don't know if I really want to spend almost 10.000 sek on something which comes with a crappy Radeon 9200 SE 32MB. Such a stupid choice.
    For the same price (add TFT-monitor) you could get an iMac but then you would have to add some things again since the default configuration sucks, and you are still stuck with the HDD (I suppose) and the crappy Graphics.
    Who do all macs have to have crappy graphics, same prices for years and expensive addons? Can't the first "price hit" be enough?

    On the second hand I have no money, but I don't want this x86 crap either.

  179. Radeon 9200 sucks for a $14000 computer by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Really I don't see why people complain about the memory issue, you can always do it yourself.

    However you can't upgrade the graphics and the Radeon 9200SE 32MB isn't all that great and for the price of the complete machine it sucks big time.

    That's what's holding me back the most.

  180. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry (offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out ArgoUML for a togetherJ workalike. It's open source, and It runs fairly well, and has a thriving community.

  181. To be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To call a G4 POWERbook in this day and age is a little crazy.

    I don't have an issue with saying "its fast enough for me". But I do have an issue paying $2,500 for a POWERbook with a CPU that is now too slow for the iMac line.

    It may be fast enough for Office and Firefox, but for that, a 500mhz G3 Pismo is fast enough.

    And what really REALLY drives me bananas is when mac users (who should be all over this problem), defend the price and lack of CPU power by saying "its fast enough".

    Dude, computers are *never* fast enough. And when an iMac for $1300 is kicking the ass of a powerbook at twice the price, that's a problem. It drive me even crazier when people say "don't wait for the G5 PB, that's silly".

    No, its not. People should stop buying PB's until apple either lowers the price to about 1/2 (ha!) or comes up with a G5 running at 1.8ghz minimum. But please stop saying the current one is "good enough". It isn't.

    I think anybody buying a PB these days over an ibook is, quite frankly, stupid.

  182. No surprise there by ravenspear · · Score: 1

    We all know geeks usually have good imaginations.

  183. It's close, but how about.. by Fussen · · Score: 1

    ..a slight tweak. It's not bad, but I think for me, I'd have to 1 up the mac if I were going compete against it's trendy style.

    I'd go elegant style with the hush case. The way those fins sit, works excellent with the ability to stack as well. And I'm not talking the whole device package, just the case. -Fussen

  184. Who needs to upgrade? by parvenu74 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, aside from upgrading the RAM, what else needs to be upgraded in this computer? I would guess that most people who are buying the Mini have another Mac or a PC or two. I fall into the latter group (my Mini is the first Mac I've ever owned) and find that it's much more effective to use the resources of my PC's (large hard drives for storing huge files, DVD burner for writing movies created with iMovie+iDVD) than to use the mini's. And with the Microsoft Remote Desktop Connector, I can pull up a full Windows XP desktop on my Mac whenever I need it, which is becoming increasingly less and less. (Oh, and using a Firewire cable to network between my PC and my Mini gives me transfer speeds that make the hard drive and not the network connection the bottleneck point!)

  185. Re:Pist Frost by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


    It works 100% fine with Firefox 1.0, which is what I use on all of these sites, including this one. Feel free to try it out, it will work fine.

  186. I'd be mad too but for different reasons by DestroBIG · · Score: 1

    ...that I paid period for it. You can get one for free. http://www.freeminimacs.com/?r=14202116

    1. Re:I'd be mad too but for different reasons by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I'm not from the US your [standard slashdot answer, don't know how to spell it]. Weird they requires that since it's "Gratis networks" and Gratis means Free in swedish so I guess they are swedes.

  187. Re: not just painted plastic by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1
    I'm guessing your new to the Mac platform. Well, get used to it! Apple's CEO and their engineers/designers pay attention to every last excruciating detail.

    Sometimes to the point of absurdity.

    Funny story from Folklore.org:

    We started having weekly management meetings in June 1981, which were attended by most of the team, where we discussed the issues of the week. At the second or third meeting, Burrell presented an intricate blueprint of the PC board layout, which had already been used to build a few working prototypes, blown up to four times the actual size.

    Steve started critiquing the layout on a purely esthetic basis. "That part's really pretty", he proclaimed. "But look at the memory chips. That's ugly. The lines are too close together".

    George Crow, our recently hired analog engineer, interrupted Steve. "Who cares what the PC board looks like? The only thing that's important is how well that it works. Nobody is going to see the PC board."

    Steve responded strongly. "I'm gonna see it! I want it to be as beautiful as possible, even if it's inside the box. A great carpenter isn't going to use lousy wood for the back of a cabinet, even though nobody's going to see it."

    George started to argue with Steve, since he wasn't on the team long enough to know that it was a losing battle. Fortunately, Burrell interrupted him.

    "Well, that was a difficult part to layout because of the memory bus.", Burrell responded. "If we change it, it might not work as well electrically".

    "OK, I'll tell you what," said Steve. "Let's do another layout to make the board prettier, but if it doesn't work as well, we'll change it back."

    So we invested another $5,000 or so to make a few boards with a new layout that routed the memory bus in a Steve-approved fashion. But sure enough, the new boards didn't work properly, as Burrell had predicted, so we switched back to the old design for the next run of prototypes.
    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  188. mod down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This ain't fark, you guys. Let's keep the mod points away from the chimps.

  189. Sour attitude by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    The key to quality in all transactions: Make the customer feel like they are getting a deal.

    Or translated, "make people believe that the cash they are handing over is worth LESS than what they get."

    So if a product selling for $400 has a worth of $500, then the customer is getting a $100 deal.

    That's how 'value' works. That's what Apple sells in their products: Value.

    Of course if this doesn't work for you, then fine, but don't go around thinking it's wrong that it works for other people.

    People buy the iPod DESPITE the Apple name. Have you thought of that? People who think, "What, 3% marketshare?", "Proprietary computer?", "Slow computer?" or, "No software?" and STILL bought an iPod? Apple does charge a premium, but it's not without merit. The iPod wasn't a con job.

  190. leaked how-to open mac mini video did it by inchhigh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think apple probably thought they had a little time before it became such common knowledge how to open and service a mac mini. Now that the cat is out of the bag, they knew they had less chance of selling the high mark up prices they were offering as many people would do it themselves or have some mac savvy friend install the upgrades. So instead of just not getting any slice of that pie, they lowered the prices to try and hold on to some of that business.

  191. 8X Superdrive?? by bradrock · · Score: 1

    For what it is worth I just checked the Apple website and the only Superdrive option is the 4X. Is the 8X yet to come or are we talking read speed? The other price/feature changes that the article suggested are reflected though.

  192. This new app, Photo-Shop? by MattHaffner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't want to run Photoshop with 256MB RAM, but I wouldn't want to run Photoshop on one of these anyway!

    Right, because no one ran Photoshop on a machine until a year ago... ???

    Photoshop runs great on my 800 MHz G4 Ti PB. I guarantee it will run better on a mini with decent memory, which in most cases is going to be 512MB or greater (my PB has 1GB). The PB surely doesn't run PS as fast as a G5, but you know they didn't exist 2 years ago (and still don't in a portable format). Funny thing is it does run it a heck of a lot faster than my 400 MHz G3 downstairs.

    Really, there's only one serious thing a tricked-out mini can't do well and that's high-end 3D gaming (or the like) due to the 9200, which is just a hair too light for my tastes. Just about every thing else you can do in a reasonable amount of time for a $500-$1000 computer. Just get that 512MB stick. At least. :)

  193. I AM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God here...
    Please don't assume your Mom or Dad probably won't need more than 512MB, you won't believe the load your Father's surfing habits put on their machine... what with the iChatting, open browser windows, java cams, streaming video files, and managing his Homepage of crossdressing bondage scenes.
    Poker on Friday night, lol.

  194. Right on by mako1138 · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to buy one, but I have no qualms about recommending it to less tech-savvy friends and relatives.

  195. Re:Why are people supporting apple? by putaro · · Score: 1

    leaking assholes in R&D

    It's all that damned veggie cuisine he made the Apple cafeteria serve.

  196. Romeo by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    Use Romeo instead. It's free and has more nifty features, as well as 3rd party plugins (which are easy as pie to make yourself).

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  197. Yes it is, damnit! by guet · · Score: 1

    While I agree with you that things are not very well integrated on a cheap PC, and the programs you get with it are usually substandard, adware or worse, Picasa for Windows is in my opinion a better solution than iPhoto 4. It's slicker, looks like it doesn't have a crazy folder structure for the pics, and has some nice presentation options (not to mention integration with Blogger). The little collages option looks cute too. Problem for not very savvy users is that they have to find out about it and download it though.

    Having said that iPhoto 5 looks like it will be a good upgrade and will hopefully fix some of the gripes people have with the older iPhoto. In a way it'd be nice if Picasa was on the mac too to provide some competition.

    I use a mac as my main machine and wouldn't use Windows, but the Apple iApps are not always the best of category (at least not in the first few iterations). It's more that the combination means you have reasonably good solutions out of the box for everything you'd like to do, solutions which just work and don't get in the way (no clippy!).

  198. Forum Spam by guet · · Score: 1

    It started with sigs, and now it moves on to messages.

    What's next, are you going to start emailing everyone in your address book (or perhaps strangers) with that link and a little blurb about this Gre4t s1te with free stuff? ?

  199. Re:Or Apple hears Anandtech's cry (offtopic) by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 1

    I have, it's one that I keep an eye on. The problem is I need good reverse engineering. Everytime I try to use Argo for this it locks up halfway through. Together and Rational are the only tools I have found that will handle large reverse engineering projects, and Rose sucks in so many other ways, it's completely unusable.

    Argo is great for forward engineering, and if all I had to do was forward, it would be my choice.

  200. Truck as a computer by cbr2702 · · Score: 1

    We could make a pretty spiffy analog computer out of a truck and a large number of computers. Imagine we want to sort our range of computers by strength to find the set strong enough to stand being run over by a truck. With a traditional computing system we'd have an O(n) task of of measuring the strength of each computer, an O(1) task of measuring the crushing power of the truck, and an O(nlog(n)) task of sorting them. With our new method, we can line up the computers in any order, O(n), and then run the truck over them, O(n), and read off the results O(n). So the traditional method is O(nlog(n)) while our new one is O(n). Ours does happen to be a destructive sort, but we can live with that.

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
    1. Re:Truck as a computer by Trillan · · Score: 1

      I really like that idea! My office has some very old servers for sale, so I plan on trying this. I'll let the IT guy drive the truck.

  201. I can't wait for mine!!! by GimliGloin · · Score: 1

    I used to be a major mac hater back in the DOS/Win16 days... Back then I wanted to tweak things. DOS/Win16 was pretty tweakable. Then I started messing with Linux. Tons of tweakability, but the apps are always in sort of a "Beta" stage. The macs I have seen are first class AND have some of the *nix features as well. I did the 1.25Mhz with the 512MB RAM. I plan to use a KVM switch with a USB keyboard to switch between Fedora Linux and the Mini. GSG

  202. The problem with this argument: by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    You do not need 1GB of RAM!!!

    Now, noone can say who does or doesn't, but I am guessing that many apps and many peoples habits of leaving things open wuoldmean that watching tv, writing DVD's, using P2P, and reading 6.2 billion graphics heavy web pages at once can consume RAM.

    512Mb is still a whole 512Mb less than 1GB. Yes prices will fall, why buy 1Gb now? Well I personally use every last Kb of it, and try and keep out of my page file.

    Yes I am a power user, I burden my poor silicon based machine (and my computer sometimes) will all the thinking jobs.

    She doesn't mind.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com