Slashdot Mirror


Where is the Killer Calendar?

AnonaCow writes "Firefox and Thunderbird rock my world, but Mozilla's Calendar (Sunbird) has a long way to go. This maybe mundane, but what software does the slashdot community use to schedule? How do you keep track of your various appointments? What about your 'To Do' List?"

725 comments

  1. Outlook 2003 by timothv · · Score: 5, Informative

    Outlook 2003, which has best calendar/todo interface I've seen.

    1. Re:Outlook 2003 by ejdmoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ditto. I even do fancy color coding. It syncs with Exchange 2003, which allows for an always up to day copy on the web and on my pocket PC phone.

      MS did Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003 right.

    2. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm a big open source convert but email and calendaring are so critical to what I do that I simply can't stand not having the best. Even if it is sadly a ms product. Nothing comes close to MS Outlook 2003, not even outlook XP.

    3. Re:Outlook 2003 by ciroknight · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'd have to argue.

      iCal is not only 100% less bloated, it's also much easier to track things like to-do lists, and have multiple, overlapping schedules. In combination with using an open standard, it's easy to publish your calenders and keep track of everything. And it integrates into open source like a mug.

      If you're ever at a Mac store, try it out. You might find you like it.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    4. Re:Outlook 2003 by zephc · · Score: 1

      I second that emotion.

      But usually I have a empty enough schedule that I can just memorize everything.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    5. Re:Outlook 2003 by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I am a scheduler power user. Outlook has everything I need and more. Very intuitive too. Not an MS fanboy, but I've yet to see anything that has the power/ease of use as Outlook.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    6. Re:Outlook 2003 by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Have to agree - I use Outlook (Office XP) and it syncs perfectly and transparently with my PDA and also my Windows-based SmartPhone - both via USB cables - and I use either the phone or PDA to 'carry' my appointments with me and also to sync them with my laptop and home PC - this all happens automatically whenever I plug one of the devices in for a charge (via a USB cable).

      In house we use eGroupWare's calendar for company and personal events - it does the job well, but the complaint is always that "it's not as good as Outlook". Open source is really crying out for an 'Outlook killer' - or at least some decent Outlook interfacing that doesn't take a million tweaks to get it 'almost working'.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    7. Re:Outlook 2003 by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      Outlook 2003 is the best calendar/to do program available for Windows. The interface is refined and fairly quick.

      I run Slackware on my primary computer but there is nothing on the Linux side that comes close to Outlook 2003. Believe me, I've tried them all. I keep a Windows box around just for my scheduling. Microsoft also got Pocket PC right. I've never had a problem syncing my Dell Axim with Outlook 2003.

      I'm not a fanboy. I use the right tool for the job. For general computing and coding I use Linux. For scheduling and gaming I use Windows. Would I like to stay on one platform? It would be nice but is currently not possible given my requirements.

    8. Re:Outlook 2003 by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Outlook DOESN'T allow you to have multiple schedules? News to me. Maybe you mean something different than what I do by the term, though...

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    9. Re:Outlook 2003 by KenFury · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if you were trying to be funny or not but outlook 2003 with exchange 2003 is IMHO the best calendar out there. Shareing appointments, booking recources (room, phones, server time, etc..) I use OSS as much as I can. I am up to 20% OSS in the server room in fact. However, for desktop scheduling nothing is better and I have pretty much quit looking at options for the last year unless I hear of something by word of mouth.

    10. Re:Outlook 2003 by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      I second that emotion.

      I third that emotion. I sync my phone regularly with it so I always have the next couple of weeks information to hand.

      Also I live in a shared house and we have a webdav server on the house LAN which we all publish our calendars to. There's also an events and birthdays calendars maintained. Is that terribly nerdy?

    11. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What exactly is wrong when bloated? With the power of todays computers I'd rather have more features than less. Hell, hardware is so far ahead of software Outlook 2003 could run perfectly on a p3 500. I fear the "B" word has kept the open source community behind the times. You fear feature-filled apps because they've been labeled as bloated. fools

    12. Re:Outlook 2003 by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Last I used Outlook, having two events with conflicting times was quite difficult to understand, if it was even understandable at all. Besides, with iCal, I can have hundreds of calender events that all coincide at the same time, and still pick them apart simply by color. Of course, I haven't used Outlook 2k3 (Why would I? I'm on a Mac and I like having free space in my ram.) but this was one of my bigger concerns.

      At the same time, I feel it really unnessicary to have a calendar and an address book overlap, which is one issue people might have problems with in iCal; the integration for people at events is still very young. I think this may change, but very slowly; introducing bloat is the last thing they want to do over at Apple these days.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    13. Re:Outlook 2003 by smittyoneeach · · Score: 0

      Like I told a part-time colleague whose full time job is working for Mr. Softy: after a 'significant emotional event' with a .pst file, I don't even have that .exe on my WinXP partition, not that I even boot 'doze much anymore.
      Gentoo Uber Youber!

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    14. Re:Outlook 2003 by Laurance · · Score: 0

      I 4th that emotion. Plus it comes free

    15. Re:Outlook 2003 by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      This whole thread is funny.

      I read the header and thought I was going to be witty and original when I came in here proclaiming 'D'oh, I use Outlook to schedule my life - whatd'ja think?' but once again I find that I have had a good idea - not an original idea, but a good idea nonetheless.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    16. Re:Outlook 2003 by kraiger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree completely... I'm a fan of simple. I don't need a huge amount of features to keep track of where I need to be and when. iCal does this perfectly, along with having great search options to also help keep track.

    17. Re:Outlook 2003 by ciroknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well see, processor speed really has nothing to do with bloat.

      This machine I'm typing on has a cool 128 MB of ram. Loading an application that requires 25 software libraries to do something as simple as sort a list or add a funky widget toolbar is not something this machine can withstand with ease. Running thin, streamlined apps is something that keeps my machine enjoyable to use.

      That said, the Open Source world is far from listening to our calls to reduce bloat; instead they drive forward, coding the same application over and over, disorganized libraries, untracable dependencies, all and all just masses of code lumped together. While this bulk of code has thousands of useful features, many of them are hidden from sight behind a terminal which scares people away, and the few that make it through to the desktop are often behind clunky software libraries that people are constantly at war building and defending.

      I hope this post doesn't come off as a troll because I really love and enjoy Linux and the BSDs that gracefully allowed Mac OS X to come into being, but I seriously hope that we get better at organizing our efforts as developers and software engineers and not continue forever honing our programming skills. While an app may not be perfect, it can Just Work, and we can fix the bugs as we go. For the critial apps, good design begets good implementation. We should embrace these lessons as we look to the future.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    18. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, thanks for your comment which offered absolutely nothing valuable, but allowed you to make sure that everyone knows that you are too important to use Windows "much anymore."

      In other words, you are the only human on Earth who cares WHAT you use, and it's remarkably pathetic that people like you feel the need to jerk off in public like this.

    19. Re:Outlook 2003 by gessel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Does anyone who ever worked on Outlook ever get on a plane? Ever? Do they know what a time zone is?

      There is only one program I've found that handles time zones correctly: TrueSync Desktop and it is abandonware. I kept buying motorola P8167s for years just so I could stick with TSD.

      There are two features of TrueSync Desktop that no other PIM seems to do correctly, and there is only one correct method. The two features are:

      1) When you create an standard event, you specify the time zone the event will happen in. All time zone math is handled automatically. This is the only correct method of handling events for people who travel outside their time zone regularly.

      2) When you mark a special day, say a birthday or a holiday, TSD remembers the date, rather than creating a 24 hour event from 0:00 to 23:59. This is the only correct way to handle special days.

      Consider the following scenarios, which I face almost every week:

      A) You are in California on the phone with someone in Boston planning a phone conference from 10:00-11:30am for next week at which time you'll be in London. What time should you set the conference for? Can you do the math? How about if you're in Phoenix in April? There are 31 time zones and almost all contain some regions that observe and some that do not observe DST. This is the sort of irritating arithmetic my computer should do, and only True Sync Desktop does it the right way.

      With Outlook can set your system time zone to the time zone the event will happen in, then create the event, then set your time zone back to the time zone you're in. Oh yeah, that's really convenient.

      B) You make a new friend on a visit a trip that includes a visit to Hawaii and Boston and put her birthday in your outlook/phone tools calendar. You get to San Francisco. What day is her birthday? With outlook when you change time zones the event straddles two days, only one of them the actual correct day. Depending on whether you travel east or west, the correct date is either the first or the second of the two days marked. How flabbergastingly stupid is that?

      Now one would think that _someone_ (anyone) involved in the development of outlook would, sooner or later, actually travel to a different time zone and realize just how utterly brain dead their handling of time zones really is (yes, outlook supports two (2)whole time zones, and for purely bicoastal people that's fine, but some of us actually travel to the flyover states occasionally. And some people even travel outside the US, which is still legal.)

      I personally can't stand the outlook look and feel. I find it sort of smothering, though I acknowledge that there are some good features to it, but if there's one good model for how a PIM should work it's True Sync Desktop, but since it won't sync to a modern phone, it's just not all that useful anymore, sadly.

      Thanks to my incessant whining, BVRP has put time zones on it's feature path, so Motorola's PhoneTools might soon correctly implement time zones and all-day events, probably more quickly if more people encourage them to.

    20. Re:Outlook 2003 by jleq · · Score: 1

      Fully agreed. Outlook 2003 is superior to everything else I've tried.

    21. Re:Outlook 2003 by Keebler71 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      iCal is not only 100% less bloated, it's also much easier to track things like to-do lists, and have multiple, overlapping schedules. In combination with using an open standard, it's easy to publish your calenders and keep track of everything.

      This is all very astonishing of you, considering that later in this thread you admit that you have never actually used Outlook2k3...

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    22. Re:Outlook 2003 by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1
      I hate to agree, but five years ago, I was responsible for rolling out email, calendaring, Usenet, and directory services across a corporation of 40,000 that had just split off from a larger company... and we were ordered to implement 200 Exchange servers (and put Outlook on people's desktops) rather than a dozen (far easier to manage) Sun boxen with IMAP (and put Netscape on everyone's desktop). Why? Because of the lack of a full-featured open source (or, heck, even closed source over an open standard that isn't MAPI) calendaring system.

      I'm too heavily committed in other pro bono and open source projects to have any time to work on Sunbird or the like, but the problem still isn't solved, five years later, and that's a shame.

    23. Re:Outlook 2003 by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Another beneift to iCal(though one that many may not need) is that iCal can automatically sync with your iPod every time you plug the iPod in. Useful if you use your iPod as a bare bones PDA. The one nice thing missing is an alarm function, but maybe a firmware upgrade could take care of that.

    24. Re:Outlook 2003 by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      I hate to agree with everyone else here*, but Outlook is my one and only scheduling program.


      *=not really. I'm glad to see so many people on here use Outlook.

    25. Re:Outlook 2003 by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

      Outlook 2003 is the best calendar/to do program available for Windows.

      I know I'll probably get shouted down over this, but I switched from Outlook to Lotus Notes and have never looked back. The interface is, um, idiosyncratic, but once you get used to it, it's immensely customisable, and surprisingly effective at ensuring you know what you need to know.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    26. Re:Outlook 2003 by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I take the fifth emotion, your honor.

    27. Re:Outlook 2003 by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Wow. So something that valuable, and you didn't make a backup? Hate to break this to you, but this is an OS independent activity. If it would cause you loss, back it up.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    28. Re:Outlook 2003 by slash.dt · · Score: 1
      Does anyone who ever worked on Outlook ever get on a plane? Ever? Do they know what a time zone is?

      Absolutely. I use Outlook all the time - in fact the only 3 apps I regularly use on my PC are outlook, X and firefox. But being based in Tokyo and regularly (as in several times a day) working with people in NY, London, HK, Singapore, Sydney, the timezone handling in Outlook sucks big time.

      Give me a groupware calendar that handles multiple timezones please!

    29. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean "I second that motion".

      I hope that helps. Have a nice day.

    30. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun ONE Calendar for appointments and such.

      Text file for TODO lists.

    31. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outlook blows and not just because it's a MS product. I have outlook installed at home and for some reason it wants to reinstall itself whenever I run it. Bloatware at it's finest. I use thunderbird, but it doesn't handle outlook appointments at all. Thunderbird is good, but why the F@ck it sorts dates ascending by default is beyond me (Yes I'd like to see what email I got 2 years ago first)
      Anyway the calander thing.. because of this I only go to
      1) Really important meetings
      2) Regularly ocurring meetings
      3) Meetings where I get a notice a day or two beforehand

      I had a 'regular' biweekly meeting with my boss, I could never keep track of it and missed it 9 times out of 10. Now I just drop by when it seems like it's been a while since the last meeting. At this point if a meeting is important enough for me to go to, someone will remind me.

    32. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't know about Outlook but iCal can do the first. You can setup as many time zones as you want and they show up in the top right corner of the windows. So when you set up the meeting for california, you just change the timezone to the west coast. add it at 10am. Then when you switch back to your time zone it will show it at the right time for you. Same thing for London. Just switch it to london and all your events timeshift so your 10am meeting becomes a 6pm one in the calendar.

      Birthdays however don't budge

    33. Re:Outlook 2003 by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 1

      I use a Mac, along with iCal, and while I like it, primarily for its simplicity, I realize its limits. Also, I haven't played much with the latest version in Tiger, so maybe they address some of this.

      A lot of the whizbang coolness that I know from using Outlook in a corporate environment is its integration with Microsoft Exchange Server. You can view anyone's calendar at any time. It will "e-mail" people who need to be at an event (i.e., a meeting), and they accept/deny, and your calendar updates with the information (e-mail is in quotes because I'm not sure if it was really e-mail or not).

      As far as I know, there isn't F/OSS that does this, although maybe KOrganzier does? I think that this market is one of the big gaps that F/OSS needs to fill on Windows to make e-mail and calendaring standarized and open.

      Maybe I'm completely wrong, I've never tried to fill the Exchange Server "gap" with F/OSS, as the company I now work for does not need it (for that matter, none of use Outlook or Entourage either - the only person who really needs a calendar uses iCal, and its not shared, nor does it need to be).

      --
      The space unintentionally left unblank.
    34. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, I have exactly the same timezone handling requirement and surprisingly, the evolution calendar does it right. You can set separate timezones for the beginning and end of an event, which I particularly like for entering flights with the "local times" listed on the airline itinerary. You can also trivially change your timezone for viewing the calendar, independently of the timezone for your computer/shell environment.

      I've been using it for years now (since my reliable calendar stopped being supported on RedHat). They seem to have shaken most of the annoying bugs out of its time handling in the past few releases that are bundled with Fedora Core. What irritates me is that evolution wants so badly to be a suite when I just want a damn calendar to go with my fetchmail+procmail+sa+mutt+rsync+ssh+xterm distributed mail handling gyrations.

    35. Re:Outlook 2003 by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've used Outlook 2k1. Unless the entire product has gone and done a COMPLETE 180 degrees, new design team, less code bloat, less confusing options and hard to set up nothings, I doubt if it's gotten any better.

      That being said, I'm open to try it, but I don't have a machine capable of running it. I've been Windows Free for quite a while now.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    36. Re:Outlook 2003 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Bloat makes apps more complex, not just larger. That means more bugs, security holes, and often harder to learn. Linux developers generally follow their Unix predecessors' design philosophy: simple programs that do one thing well, linked together for more complex features. Without having to take the whole batch in a monolithic program. It's easier to develop, and, when packaged properly, easier to use and support. You probably just don't know what those benefits are like, because Microsoft's platform has always been organized on selling a single monolithic app to the most people, by inserting features to bring everyone on board an app most people won't ever completely use. It is you who has been fooled, by your narrow experience.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    37. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is all very astonishing of you, considering that later in this thread you admit that you have never actually used Outlook2k3

      It's okay, when Apple makes the switch to Intel he won't have any choice but Outlook. Let him bleat now.

    38. Re:Outlook 2003 by The_Quinn · · Score: 1
      iCal is not only 100% less bloated, it's also much easier to track things like to-do lists, and have multiple, overlapping schedules
      How in the sam-hell can you compare things to Outlook 2k3 when you admit you have NEVER EVEN USED IT later in this very thread???
    39. Re:Outlook 2003 by QuaZar666 · · Score: 1

      see I like the features of Lotus Notes like the database ability, its archive ability, the security of syncing with a notes server. but I hate the look and feel of the calender, email, etc. besides its called notes, but there is no place to put a little note like there is in Outlook. But the database features are very nice feature to have, if used. If they aren't used then, to me, it is a waste of a major feature.

    40. Re:Outlook 2003 by UnderScan · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree that OSS could certainly be better, but how about recognizing something like KDE? KDE could use better defaults but there are activly working on improving that. As for the design, libraries, & performance, have you heard that like OS X, KDE gets faster on the same hardware with every new release? Did you also know that KDE uses compontenized & modularized (I am killing the spelling) KIOslaves & KParts which help to expose functionallity to every KDE app which reduces redundancy & waste. If a new KPart or KIOslave is created for 1 app, it can be used by all apps. This is how you open a text file from a remote system in the Kate editor by pointing the Open dialog to ftp://ftp.system.com/directory/file.txt.

      Also note that your complaint about bloat falls on the deaf ears of comercial/propreitary software devs too. Close source apps are bloating up all the time. Think of how much redundancy is used even in MS apps when Office XP or 2k3, Visual Studio, Media player, & normal apps use different libraries which provide different GUI widgets & controls. How about Adobe Acrobat? They finally heard the collective complains about that bloated POS & v7 is quick to load up. Now only if they could retroactively make v5 & v6 quicker.

    41. Re:Outlook 2003 by miguelfp1 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree, even though I'm an open source fan, I find it really convenient having my eMail, Calendar, Contacts and To-Do list in a single program. Also it has a much improved (over previous versions) and user-friendly interface. Plus it syncs with my Pocket PC.

    42. Re:Outlook 2003 by miguelfp1 · · Score: 1

      iCal is a great app, the problem for us Windows-only users, not available for Win. (Jobs should think about porting it!)

    43. Re:Outlook 2003 by The+Conductor · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Fair enough, but y'know, Outlook doesn't make backup management easy. Everything...every email from the beginning of time to two minutes ago, every contact, every appt, all in one honkin' PST file. Not the sort of thing that lends itself to incremental backups. Get a single email today? That's the whole 2 GB PST file to backup tonight. PST file bigger than 700 MB? Gotta figure out how to span multiple CD-R's, or no soup for you!

      Where I work, the users have pushed their PST files onto the local fileserver, and the nightly backup (out the building's T1) has become so large that it runs into the next work morning, clogging the link so people can't login.

      I use have to use Outlook every day and my conclusion is that it is for people who don't care about reliability. The users have gotten a vague feel for this fact and have developed workarounds: People in our Chinese locations routinely request return receipts. Anything really important doesn't go over email anymore, making conference calls with Europe & the far East very common, and the workday stretches out to all manner of odd hours.

      For the record, I use Kmail & Kalandar at home. Not quite as automatic as Outlook (when it works, that is, and when you can trust it, which is never), and a little more work to set up, but not lacking any feature I really need.

    44. Re:Outlook 2003 by killjoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      I could not disagree more. It's bloated, overly complex, has options buried 15 clicks deep, slow as hell, and really gives you no more functionality then dozens of other PIMs on the market for the windows platform. I used to be forced to use it at work, I am so glad I don't work there anymore.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    45. Re:Outlook 2003 by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Um... it DID.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    46. Re:Outlook 2003 by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      KOrganizer handles world timezones perfectly. My Palm IIIxe, however does not, so when I book a trans-Pacific flight and pull in the .vcs file, KOrganizer has no trouble, but syncing to my Palm splits it into two appointments. That confounding Int'l Date Line!

    47. Re:Outlook 2003 by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Your criticism of Outlook's backup is somewhat fair. However if you are runing into 2GB backups, you are clearly sould be in a Microsoft Exchange environment, not a standalone Outlook.

      If your files are really that size, you might have some kind of corruption in the file itself. I hoard e-mails, and use the scheduler/task list like your wouldn't believe and haven't gone over 125 meg.

      While you may have an outlook file that is really this big, you'd have to be a super user who never archives anything to achieve this (or you archive file attachments too... accck).

      But this is moot if you are off it entirely.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    48. Re:Outlook 2003 by circusboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      sigh... Some people just don't know their pop music...

      'Hope that helps. have a nice day.'

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    49. Re:Outlook 2003 by dougmc · · Score: 1
      iCal is not only 100% less bloated, it's also much easier to track things like to-do lists
      I use ical too. But it's probably not the ical you're thinking of.

      It's pretty basic, but it does most of what I need. What it's lacking is somethign to take Outlook/Exchange events and import them automatically -- I need to write something to do that for me.

    50. Re:Outlook 2003 by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      And it doesn't handle multiple users.

    51. Re:Outlook 2003 by swmccracken · · Score: 4, Informative

      You've not been using Outlook 2003 in the recommended Cached Exchange Mode. We are - and it makes PST files look quaint. :-)

      (In cached mode, Outlook "merely" synchronises against Exchange. Everything is stored in both places - meaning that nothing on the client has to be backed up, you only have to back-up the store on the Exchange server. This is easy to do - just use NTBACKUP to generate a BKF file - you don't even shut the server down. Also, since you only have to protect the server, you'll often use a decent RAID setup to reduce the chance the backup will ever be needed.)

      If a workstation falls over, you reinstall outlook and set up the account. It just downloads everything back from the server and you're up and running.

      It also sounds like you have an information managment problem - people's outlook account is not really where you should be storing important corporate information.

    52. Re:Outlook 2003 by mr.+methane · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those who use the Treo, there's an app called "versamail" (I think) which sync's the palm calendar with outlook as well. It's not real-time, but pretty close to it (I think mine is set for hourly updates.)

    53. Re:Outlook 2003 by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Mac version, Entourage, that comes with Office 2004 is just as nice. In fact, Entourage is why I started using Outlook on my PCs. I couldn't live without a calendering app. In fact, I've thought about buying a PDA that will sink with Outlook and Entourage. Any ideas?

    54. Re:Outlook 2003 by Meshach · · Score: 1

      We can all say we use these Linux office apps, but my main use of office apps come from work. Most of us I suspect would be the same. Most workplaces use MS

      The MS tools are better known to more people and hence easier (and therefore cheaper) for IT departments to troubleshoot and support. This (comanies) is where the real battle for office suites is taking place

      We can all use open source at home till the cows come home. But until major orgainizations see a reason to move away from office it will dominate

      --
      "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
      Aldous Huxley
    55. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's okay, when Apple makes the switch to Intel he won't have any choice but Outlook. Let him bleat now.
      When did MS fanboys earn the right to call anybody sheep?
    56. Re:Outlook 2003 by Stelminator · · Score: 1

      Yup, it really did.

      Granted, it also got a face-lift to the XP theme, which I don't think it needed, but stuff is much better organized.

      I'm especially fond of the new way to make filters. Just a right click and couple lefts and Outlook provides most of the necessary options to make a filter that would match the current message. I use it to sort each sender into its own folder (senders I know I'm going to get more from).

      I'm not an MS fan boy, but Office 2k3 seems to run faster than Office XP, with more features. If I recall correctly, they actually made the MS Word executable smaller from XP to 2k3 (note: I didn't compare dll's or anything, and I looked at the size a long time ago.).

    57. Re:Outlook 2003 by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

      Lotus notes does it perfectly well too

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    58. Re:Outlook 2003 by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I'm not being a flamer here but I use Outlook 2003 and it's the same damn thing that Outlook 2000 was.
      Just alot slower.

      Outlook does have a great calendar and a To Do (task) list with attendees and invites (even link with NetMeeting) but it's too slooooow.

      We're running nothing slower than a P4 1.7 Ghz and messages from the Exchange server aren't instantaneous like with Outlook 2000.

      Granted that Outlook also only runs on Microsoft Windows, it is the best calendaring app so far.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    59. Re:Outlook 2003 by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      or maybe he ment an emotion, like eMotion, like electronic motion!

      What will they think of next, an iMotion?

    60. Re:Outlook 2003 by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As much as I frown upon people posting without knowing all the facts, I will say this (from the perspective of someone who has dabbled in both)

      iCal in theory, will always be less bloated than outlook, simply because it has a more limited feature set --- read into this however you may.

      By its own nature, all iCal has to do is provide a rudiementary scheduling interface. Although the UI is beautiful and the program very useful, the future set is very basic. For people like myself who do not require the full capabilities of outlook and exchange, iCal is more than adequate. On top of iCal's very basic architecture, of course, you get neat features tacked on top such as automated reminders and web publishing.

      If you work in a big company and use exchange, quite simply, that extra code bloat in outlook is going to pay off bigtime, because you're actually going to be using that "bloat" to boost productivity. If you need the advanced workgroup features of outlook/exchange, chances are you're already using it.

      At the moment, for windows, Outlook 2003 appears to be the best calendaring/email application out there, regardless of wether or not you use it to its fullest extent. Although I love iCal for its simpliity and ease of use, I give major props to the MS development team for creating a damn good application. Considering the extra capabilities outlook brings to the table (wether or not they're actually necessary), Microsoft managed to do it with virtually no bloat. Outlook 2003 truly is an elegant application.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    61. Re:Outlook 2003 by poor_boi · · Score: 1

      less code bloat You've got the source code for Outlook?!

    62. Re:Outlook 2003 by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      " Outlook 2003, which has best calendar/todo interface I've seen."

      jon_k@1[~]$ cal
      June 2005
      Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
      1 2 3 4
      5 6 7 8 9 10 11
      12 13 14 15 16 17 18
      19 20 21 22 23 24 25
      26 27 28 29 30

      jon_k@1[~]$

      I also put my appointments and to-do list in a text file using nano!

      Its not the best, but it works! ;-)

    63. Re:Outlook 2003 by gilroy · · Score: 1

      I am loth to admit it but I like Outlook, too. I just wish I knew how to view multiple calendars in an overlay fashion. Right now my school maintains something like six different calendars, and I have to check each one for each date. Bleh.

    64. Re:Outlook 2003 by wik · · Score: 1

      What happens when the company's outlook server deletes messages >30 days old? Do they get deleted from the local cache, too?

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    65. Re:Outlook 2003 by hyc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I used to use Outlook 2000. I switched to Mozilla after my Outlook archive.pst died, it hit 16384 items and wouldn't accept any more. So much for archiving... The Mozilla calendar is definitely in sad shape. The Mozilla POP3 client was too, but I bludgeoned the code until it did what I want. Don't have time to do the same for calendar, unfortunately.

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
    66. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      B) You make a new friend on a visit a trip that includes a visit to Hawaii and Boston and put her birthday in your outlook/phone tools calendar.
      I was willing to believe you left your parent's basement. However once you started saying you'd made friends with a girl - you lost all credibility.
    67. Re:Outlook 2003 by swmccracken · · Score: 1

      Without testing or checking up on it, I believe that's the case.

      (Our server is not configured to do that -- if you need to control mailbox sizes, a direct quota makes far more sense to me.)

      We do use it to clean out Deleted Items folders, and such messages do dissapear from Outlook.

    68. Re:Outlook 2003 by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      At this point if a meeting is important enough for me to go to, someone will remind me.

      Did you get the memo about the TPS reports?

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    69. Re:Outlook 2003 by NotBorg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Does anyone who ever worked on Outlook ever get on a plane? Ever? Do they know what a time zone is?

      Anyone take an exchange server around the world? I maintain a few shipboard servers for the US Navy, and one thing I know (believe) is that Microsoft never intended for exchange servers to change time zones. If we update the time zone of the server, say advance it by one time zone, all scheduled events are off by an hour. The only solution we found that outlook, exchange, and some other software would work with (because they seem to have differing ideas about how to reflect the change) was to leave the time zone the same and just advance the clock.

      It seems also that both exchange and outlook have some if-then blocks to deal with some time zone changing, but nether knows what the other does about it. I'm not sure if this has changed with newer versions of the software (we are several behind the current).

      One would think that if the exchange server doesn't move (it usually doesn't), that outlook would work across time zone changes.

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    70. Re:Outlook 2003 by loraksus · · Score: 1

      I've used Outlook 2k1
      Just a question, but what made you believe that you can speak with some kind of fucking authority on 2k3 then?
      Not trying to be any sort of zealot, but jesus...

      I've put office 2k3 on a 466 celery with 128mb of ram. Runs fine. Of course, the OS was 2k3 server, so that is a pretty important thing, as XP runs like shit on that box.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    71. Re:Outlook 2003 by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Have you tried evolution? It has email, calender, contacts, and a to-do list in one program. It's actually very nice. I use it everyday.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    72. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time MS tried to reduce redundancy they got sued! :-)

    73. Re:Outlook 2003 by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      Rubbish - we have OL2000 pst's and archives of tens of thousands of items

    74. Re:Outlook 2003 by darkonc · · Score: 1
      Anything built around windows is gonna be braindead when it comes to handling Timezones. I point this out to students as a side effect of Windows being inherently single-user. All times in Windows are the ephemeral 'local' time (whatever 'local' means).

      Unix, on the other hand, being inherently multi-user has needed to deal with users in different timezones since it's early days -- thus UNIX time is based on GMT (now UCT) with a timezone offset for display. This is why programs like Evolution (which is Unix based) are more likely to be sane about dealing with timezones.

      (PS: If you want to know what time it is in Calcuta, try:

      TZ=Asia/Calcutta date
      in bash.)
      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    75. Re:Outlook 2003 by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      Wow, I was thinking of KDE as being a GREAT example of what is WRONG with OSS!

      I mean think about it, to run, lets say, a MP3 PLAYER, you also end up loading about 15-30 megabytes of additional libraries.

      And if KDE is more streamlined with every release, why does KDE 2.x require a 64 meg system, and KDE 3.x requires at least a 256 meg system! (though honestly I run KDE with 256 megs and it SUCKS, horribly!)

      The kicker is, the default theme for 2.x and 3.x look almost identical, albiet 3.3+ have a kicking themes engine which allow KDE to look REALLY damn good and incure little if any performance hit. (the flip side of this is, you can not really "disable" themes in KDE, you always incure the performance hit!)

      • If a new KPart or KIOslave is created for 1 app, it can be used by all apps. This is how you open a text file from a remote system in the Kate editor by pointing the Open dialog to


      This is just common sense, users have been TRYING to do this for years, it has just taken developers forever to catch up!

      Windows kinda-sorta-maybe does this at times, it really should do it MORE often, mostly it is programmer mindlessness that keeps Windows from kicking much more ass UI wise.

      BTW: When did /. get the new "verify you are not a script" thing? How odd, I do not remember it a few days ago.
    76. Re:Outlook 2003 by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      besides its called notes, but there is no place to put a little note like there is in Outlook.

      I'm not sure what you mean by this, but I generally use the Journal for little notes. If that's not what you're looking for, you could just make a new database and call it "place for little notes"...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    77. Re:Outlook 2003 by ecloud · · Score: 1

      Well, the point of a birthday is to celebrate the anniversary of the instant at which you were born. So the most correct thing to do would be store that event as a time rather than a date, and then if you are in a different time zone at the time, it doesn't matter, because it's stored as an event in UTC, and will show up on the correct day which corresponds to the correct time at that other point on Earth where you were actually born. Unfortunately we're not accustomed to sharing this level of detail with friends - just the date, not the time. As long as you don't live very far from where you born, it's close enough. So this problem is partially cultural, and if you accept the fact that you are already tolerating some uncertainty, it's hard to decide which is the "right" approach to do in software. I mean, I was born on one day in Arizona, but if I then move to China, and live there for the rest of my life (neglecting the lack of any good reason for me to move to China...) do I move my birthdate to accommodate the fact that it's across the date line? Logically I should, but this isn't the custom. If all of my friends are in Arizona and care to continue celebrating my birthday in my absense, it makes more sense for them to celebrate it on my birthdate as it exists in my birth timezone, not on a different day just because I now live in China and choose to use the local clocks to decide which date is my birthday.

      My wife is from a time zone 9-10 hours away depending on their DST, which we don't have in Arizona, so we think of New Years as two separate events - when it's midnight in her country, and when it's midnight here. It's more important for her to drink a toast at her "home" midnight, and imagine her family doing so simultaneously, but it happens to be mid-afternoon here.

      So if you just give a birthdate to software, without a specific time, it could just assume that it was at 12 noon (smack in the middle of the day) at the home time zone of that person, and then adjust accordingly for your own time zone. It's as reasonable an assumption as any.

    78. Re:Outlook 2003 by Spetiam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I use Evolution, and I've got to say... Outlook blows it out of the water. I like things to be free and open source, but Outlook (2003 especially) has no equal in the foss world. None. Fanboys can mod me down, but it won't change reality. Groupware and calendaring have a LONG way to go in foss.

    79. Re:Outlook 2003 by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I have really been enjoying my use of sunbird and I think that both iCal and sunbird could learn from each other. The use of the actual iCal format is great and something that outlook lacks. I cant point outlook to my webdav folder and tell it to work with the calendar that I access on multiple machines.

      iCal REALLY needs to be able to publish and subscribe to the same calendar. Sunbird does it with no problem. In a large system, there could be concurrency errors but on a small scale, its behavior is fine (it downloads a new version of hte file, applies changes, reuploads). iCal can only do one or the other which is a pain if you want to set it up to be shared between a few computers (home and work or a small office).

      Sunbird just needs to get better. It looks like it will be replaced with lightning which will make thunderbird more of an outlook competetor (I love it for IMAP email). It's printing system pretty much sucks (no options for color or really any options besides what to display, the fact that it has to be reopened every time you change an option...) and there are many functions that are sketchy or dont work at all. It also could really use the ability to move an event from one calendar to another (or at least copy it).

      I've been using Sunbird for many months now, running several of my own calendars (webdav) and subscribing to someone elses (that they are updating from iCal on icalx or something) and it has been very stable. I would say that the mozilla calendar core is pretty solid and it could be a strong comptetetor if it fixated on a single release (no calendar, sunbird, lighting) and got some real development done. Lightning would clearly be the best option for this and it looks like it is what has been chosen.

      --
      Bottles.
    80. Re:Outlook 2003 by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      For a moment I thought you were talking about Lotus Notes there...

    81. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The most famed and used mp3 player in kde is amarok, and when you run it, yes you probably load a couple of libraries (don't know for sure which, I'm just a user). But you know what you get due to the fact of what's in those libraries, and the fact that amarok developers had it easy that way?

      -Lyrics
      -Notification in the Desktop
      -(In the next version) Tab to Wikipedia link of band being played
      -Cover-fetching from amazon (I think they're going to change it to use google)
      -Playing the damn Audio
      -etc.

      I think the developers can talk more about it than me...

      Libraries like these *reduce* bloat. You know why? Because they're maintained by some guys, so that the other guys don't have to worry about them and so concentrate to make their applications better and faster.

      And if two applications use the same library , you only get a version of it in memory, so libraries *cut down memory use*!

      BTW, kde is getting faster and faster at each release on the same computer. Ok, I've got 256 megs, but I got kde to run ok. How ? First of all, each version of kde runs better in my system than the previous. But to get a really sleek experience I just had to do tweaks to the system. Like hdparm, tuning vm.swappiness, shutting down services, shutting down arts (It's slow as hell), etc. Search in the net for those things, kde benefits from these tunings . Or, just get a little bit more memory, it's not that expensive....

      I'm completely impressed by kde, except for having a couple of crashes once in a while. I think it's better than xp or os x. It's friggin amazing.

      For example, as I type this, some words are getting red. That's because every friggin text box in every friggin html that every friggin application opens uses spell check. And these kind of things are only possible to libraries and the genius that the kde devels are by integrating, re-using and creating the framework for these kind of things be possible and (very important) easy to mantain by the developers themselves.

    82. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should all check out GemX's doOrganizer 2.0, it blows Outlook (and everything else I've seen) out of the water.

      Outlook isn't multi-dimentional, doOrganizer (formerly Deviant Organizer) is the only fully multi dimentional PIM on the market.

    83. Re:Outlook 2003 by pennyher0 · · Score: 1

      Your Hawaii/birthday example would probably work better if you picked a region that was on the other side of the international date line. Some place like Japan perhaps. A birthday in San Francisco and in Hawaii would fall on the same day for both regions.

    84. Re:Outlook 2003 by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, all that K[foo] stuff is great, except for one thing: all my X, GTK+, Python/Tk, etc. stuff doesn't use it -- and don't start yammering about "use all KDE programs," because that's never going to happen.

      Call me when there's a standard!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    85. Re:Outlook 2003 by shmlco · · Score: 1
      Linux developers generally follow their Unix predecessors' design philosophy: simple programs that do one thing well, linked together for more complex features...

      You can sell it but I'm not buying any. From my perspective FOSS developers revel in adding every cool feature and function they and five other people will use.

      Don't believe me? Check out the function lists of something like mySQL or, better yet, PHP. Or the number of programs that have known bugs on a given platform, but hey, at least they can be skinned...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    86. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thunderbird is good, but why the F@ck it sorts dates ascending by default is beyond me (Yes I'd like to see what email I got 2 years ago first)

      Annoying yes. However, if you click the date heading once to reverse the sort order, doesn't it remember the setting from then on? It has for me through almost all versions of Thunderbird that I've used - which is all of them.
    87. Re:Outlook 2003 by hyc · · Score: 1

      Don't be an asshole. Why would I make this shit up?

      Try storing more than 16383 items in one folder. It won't let you. Here's a screenshot of my archive.pst Inbox, just to demonstrate:

      http://www.highlandsun.com/hyc/ol2000max.png

      If you're routinely putting tens of thousands of items into PST files, you're going to hit a wall, sooner or later, and it has nothing to do with filesystem/disk space.

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
    88. Re:Outlook 2003 by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      his is how you open a text file from a remote system in the Kate editor by pointing the Open dialog to ftp://ftp.system.com/directory/file.txt [system.com].

      see: bloat

      how am I going to open a remote image with gimp ?

      oh dear, no go

      all that KDE protocol crap is, well, wrong.

      If only they got "everything is a file" not "every protocol needs a new KIOslave"

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    89. Re:Outlook 2003 by killjoe · · Score: 1

      As far as I am concerned exchange is the 74 pinto to notes 72 pinto. Marginally better but still sucky and lible to go up in flames.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    90. Re:Outlook 2003 by ace_brickman · · Score: 1

      I agree with ya. My schedule isn't full of tasks, projects, work groups, contacts, etc. yet in order buckle down and dive into an iCal/Entourage-esque application. My meetings and special events are just entered into my cell phone's "calendar"


      -I just lost my /. posting virginity

      --
      Users of the world: We're here to help you, but help us help you. (your IT dept)
    91. Re:Outlook 2003 by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      X?

      I wanted to look that up. Do you know how difficult that is?

      So what's "X"?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    92. Re:Outlook 2003 by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      True, but if you start using Outlook don't count on ever getting rid of it -- exporting stuff out from it is hell. Outport mostly works, but when it doesn't, you're really out of luck.

      I value my information enough to keep it in a format that is at least readable, preferably free.

    93. Re:Outlook 2003 by sllim · · Score: 1

      Ummmm....
      I would think that using World Standard Time (Greenwich, zulu - whatever you want to call it) would be pretty much S.O.P. onboard a Navy Vessel.

      I guess not.

    94. Re:Outlook 2003 by dspisak · · Score: 1

      Why not just set your system time to UTC?

    95. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Linux you insensitive clod!

    96. Re:Outlook 2003 by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      I cant point outlook to my webdav folder and tell it to work with the calendar that I access on multiple machines.

      Umm.. yes, actually, you can. Well, actually, Outlook can use Exchange, which provides a WebDAV interface to mail and other data (including calendering). This makes your schedule available via WebDAV and via Outlook as well.

    97. Re:Outlook 2003 by julesh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      all that KDE protocol crap is, well, wrong.

      If only they got "everything is a file [bell-labs.com]" not "every protocol needs a new KIOslave"


      "Everything is a file" is a great abstraction, but it can only be implemented by the operating system. kioslaves are simply an abstraction layer that adds the ability to treat non-file objects as if they were a file without OS support for the notion -- it's the only way they can do it without junking support for just about every operating system in existance.

      how am I going to open a remote image with gimp ?

      Why don't you ask the GIMP developers to support it? Or ask the developers of the kernel of the operating system you use to support it? Rather than using it as an excuse for complaining about KDE, when it is not the KDE team's fault and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it?

      BTW, if you're on Linux you might want to look into the FUSE/kioslave bridge project, which apparently allows you to mount kioslave plugins as if they were a real filesystem...

    98. Re:Outlook 2003 by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. there must be something wrong because Outlook 2003 is faster than any previous version everywhere i've used it.

    99. Re:Outlook 2003 by nihilogos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't *anyone* on slashdot run linux anymore?

      --
      :wq
    100. Re:Outlook 2003 by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
      At the moment, for windows, Outlook 2003 appears to be the best calendaring/email application out there, regardless of wether or not you use it to its fullest extent.
      I take it that by the fullest extent you mean a mailbox of 2GB in size just before the whole thing gets corrupted and needs to be recovered by third party tools - or is that "feature" finally dealt with?

      How may ways do you want to define where the signature file is today?

    101. Re:Outlook 2003 by Weh · · Score: 1

      there's also a nice windows version (free for personal use).

    102. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? With a real CPU they'll useful, instead of just expensive, pretty paperweights. You'll even be able to run a real operating system on them, too.

    103. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, yer totally abusing yer inbox. Try sorting some of yer shit sometime into separate folders and deleting some other crap. You can't blame yer inbox one bit.

    104. Re:Outlook 2003 by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Thanks man for explaining the wonders of kde. I wish I could tell everybody how much I'm enjoying it, but I'm not that good with words :)

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    105. Re:Outlook 2003 by exKingZog · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can make PST files bigger than 2Gb with Outlook 2003. However, if you're connected to an Exchange Server back-end then you're no longer using PST files except maybe as a personal archive. (That said, they're still a pain...)

      --
      "If he were a plant, people would roll him up and smoke him."
    106. Re:Outlook 2003 by gullevek · · Score: 1

      the only negative thing about iCal is that he can't write to a subscribed calendar. This is a real pain

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    107. Re:Outlook 2003 by halo8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can answer this because i had another customer with this exact same case 2 weeks ago

      the Exchange Team told me that the servers were never meant to have their time changed. Microsoft handles time changes on the client side (meaning windows) so windows adjusts the time for you and that reflects on the Outlook

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    108. Re:Outlook 2003 by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Does anyone who ever worked on Outlook ever get on a plane? Ever? Do they know what a time zone is?

      I have taken Outlook with me on a plane crossing time-zones once. Just once. Never ever ever again; it caused me to miss the plane coming back. Was I idiotic? Perhaps yes - for trusting Outlook with my information. (Such is life with E-tickets: the information about the itinerary has to go somewhere, and look what happens if it goes to Outlook.) Well, that one incident means I will never touch f***ing Outlook ever ever again: if I can't trust it, it's no good to me.

      Oh, and what do I use for a calendar? Nowadays I use one made of paper. I find it much more reliable, versatile, portable, and cost-effective than anything else I've tried.

    109. Re:Outlook 2003 by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you had said 16383 msgs in one *folder* rather than the entire pst - which is actually what you wrote, check the original message.

      Also what I'll second what another poster said - that many msgs in a folder (left alone the inbox) is ridiculous, you are the user that gives sysadmins nightmares.

    110. Re:Outlook 2003 by Taladar · · Score: 1

      If all the developers developing functionality in this KDE-only style would put the (wasted) effort into programming this on the OS-level (as in: writing filesystem drivers instead of KIOslaves) every app could use this, not just the ones linking with kdelibs.

    111. Re:Outlook 2003 by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      Need I remind you of... uh... remind?

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    112. Re:Outlook 2003 by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      I've never actually used Outlook because I never needed it before. I use Evolution now because I need a PIM. Can you tell me what is so inferior about Evolution compared to Outlook?

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    113. Re:Outlook 2003 by maxume · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the PDA is heavier than water, you should be just fine.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    114. Re:Outlook 2003 by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      Oh, so that's why when I'm running GNOME if I just want to fire up a simple text editor (Kate) it brings a crapload of other stuff into memory and takes forever to start (plus leaves stuff hanging around in memory afterwards). For just that little app.

      Yeah, great design.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    115. Re:Outlook 2003 by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised the Navy isn't just using UTC for the time base of its servers. The time zone of the client should be set in the user's locale information - or does Outlook not support the Outlook client being in a different TZ to the Exchange server?

    116. Re:Outlook 2003 by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      It also sounds like you have an information managment problem - people's outlook account is not really where you should be storing important corporate information.

      I would argue that Outlook accounts ARE "important corporate information". If you don't trust Outlook (as implied by your statement), then maybe it shouldn't be used at all.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    117. Re:Outlook 2003 by TellarHK · · Score: 1

      I've got to say that I've found Outlook in general to be very nice for recovering from another type of system issue - the monthly Windows system reinstall! Hey, all I need to do is wipe /windows, reinstall Windows and Office, import the PST and I'm all done!

      Except for ... wiping ... my entire ... fucking OS ... because it SUCKS. And adding all my email accounts in, and redesigning my filters, and ... Etc.

      I'm probably going to be moving all my email to one of my Mac machines soon. It'd be better to just use my Powerbook for email if I can get into the habit. For just email, the standard Tiger client is pretty nice. But I really hope the FOSS community - and Apple, for that matter - look at this thread and take some ideas of those areas that Outlook got right, and acknowledge where it went wrong.

    118. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The KOrganizer is way cool and understand the TZ too.
      It talks to crappy Exchange 2003 with no problems.

    119. Re:Outlook 2003 by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      "If a new KPart or KIOslave is created for 1 app, it can be used by all apps."

      Wow. You mean...like...COM?

      Not everything from MS is total crap.

      Regarding redudancy and bloat in MS Apps, I'm sure it is present. However apps do use common libraries (dll's), objects (via COM, ActiveX, and now .NET), and GUI widgets.

      Bloat and redundancy are introduced when the common objects "just aren't good enough". Or if one vendor is trying to differentiate their software more from a competitor.

      I have four different sound editing programs, 10 different graphics programs, and a slew of compilers on my system. Each category of program shares 90% of the functionality across all of them. But many do not share common libraries (or look and feel).

      But where would we be if we didn't have software competition?

      I bet MS knows the answer to that question.

      ~X~

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    120. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonderful. Now, please explain to the average "end user" what benefit KIOslaves and KParts brings to them.

    121. Re:Outlook 2003 by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      Did you notice that KDE developers are not the same people than kernel developers?

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    122. Re:Outlook 2003 by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      The time zone of the client should be set in the user's locale information - or does Outlook not support the Outlook client being in a different TZ to the Exchange server?

      I assume so - I never saw any obvious weirdness dealing with Exchange clients spread across four timezones connecting to an Exchange server in my previous job.

    123. Re:Outlook 2003 by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      So you discovered that KDE applications are not meant to be run from Gnome?

      Congratulations!

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    124. Re:Outlook 2003 by cecil_turtle · · Score: 1

      Outlook 2001 was a Mac-only release. I wonder if Microsoft made some changes in porting the app over to the Mac. On Windows there was Outlook 2000, XP (2002) and 2003. So the last version you used is at least two versions out of date, plus ported to the Mac.

      Also replying to your grandparent post, while iCal is open, I'm not aware of any standards organization that adopted it as a standard. Other calendar applications (including Sunbird) are supporting it, but I'm disappointed to see a non-XML format becoming the de-facto standard.

      All that said, I use Outlook 2003 at work because I have to, and my wife likes it at home, but I'm on the lookout for an open-source calendaring (sp) app that I can use at home (don't want to spend the ). Sunbird is cool but still a bit buggy.

    125. Re:Outlook 2003 by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Exchange Server messages aren't instantaneous like they were in Outlook 2000.
      The server is a dual P3 800Mhz and with a small office of 13, messages have to be 'sent and received' in some cases to check.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    126. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey dumbass, both gnome and kde have their points. you're pretty much forced to use apps from both evironments if you want the best available.

    127. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horseshit. MS did Exchange 2003 right? Then, as a sys admin, change someone's Out of Office message/rule, from the server. No.. MS did things very very wrong with exchange. It's a very bad product, and I'm forced to suffer with it every day.

    128. Re:Outlook 2003 by julesh · · Score: 1

      If all the developers developing functionality in this KDE-only style would put the (wasted) effort into programming this on the OS-level (as in: writing filesystem drivers instead of KIOslaves) every app could use this, not just the ones linking with kdelibs.

      Yes, but only the ones running on one particular operating system. I know that KDE can run on at least Linux, Windows/cygwin, NetBSD, and OpenBSD. I believe there's also a MacOSX port. To write OS level drivers for all these systems would have been substantially more work than writing the kioslaves plugin system, not least because writing a kernel-based FS driver is a *lot* harder than writing a library to emulate it in userspace.

    129. Re:Outlook 2003 by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      Oh, count me as one Linux user who not only agrees, but is somewhat more extreme! I go weeks at a time with the desktop switched off, using just the console. It does everything I need to do.

      People need to understand that an ASCII dump of a buffer full of text into a hard-drive sector is exactly the same operation as selecting the flower-shaped Save entry from the Garden popup menu with your Busy-Bee-cursored mouse pointer and the assistance of a winking, mugging, hammy, animated, chatty paper clip. The first method just takes less time.

      WHEN in hell did my happy text-mode console have to become everybody's own private Disneyland ? And when will the lusers go away and leave us as we were before?

    130. Re:Outlook 2003 by unapersson · · Score: 2, Informative

      "how am I going to open a remote image with gimp ?

      oh dear, no go"

      File -> Open Location.

      Seems to work fine to me, you can also drag the URL from another application.

    131. Re:Outlook 2003 by mpe · · Score: 1

      Anyone take an exchange server around the world? I maintain a few shipboard servers for the US Navy, and one thing I know (believe) is that Microsoft never intended for exchange servers to change time zones.

      Dosn't the USN use UCT for everything?
      For a long time the "Windows Way" of handing timezones was insist that the hardware clock kept local time. Even now there is stupidity like the XP install which asks you where you are then asks you for the timezone (defaulting to US West Coast).
      The sensible way to do it is the "unix method". Use GMT/UCT internally and calculate local time on demand. In the case of a ship GPS would appear to be a good solution to knowing location and thus local time.

      One would think that if the exchange server doesn't move (it usually doesn't)

      Even if it dosn't it's still likely to have to deal with local time changing twice a year,

      that outlook would work across time zone changes.

      That's assuming that Microsoft understand the mechanics of timezones which they apparently don't...

    132. Re:Outlook 2003 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      If you can show me that the majority of Linux programs could be split into independent programs, you can say something about the general Linux design philosophy. Until then, your exceptions prove nothing.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    133. Re:Outlook 2003 by mpe · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have exactly the same timezone handling requirement and surprisingly, the evolution calendar does it right.

      Getting a 21st century machine to understand a 19th century concept should be a "no brainer". That people can be suprised when software does the right thing shows how low popular expectations are.

      You can set separate timezones for the beginning and end of an event, which I particularly like for entering flights with the "local times" listed on the airline itinerary.

      A fairly common way for airlines to give the timings of flights to passengers. Wonder how well the Microsoft stuff coped when Concorde was still flying :)

    134. Re:Outlook 2003 by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1

      Would you mind elaborating on just how Outlook is better than Evo, for one who has never used Outlook?

    135. Re:Outlook 2003 by mpe · · Score: 1

      Well, the point of a birthday is to celebrate the anniversary of the instant at which you were born. So the most correct thing to do would be store that event as a time rather than a date, and then if you are in a different time zone at the time, it doesn't matter, because it's stored as an event in UTC, and will show up on the correct day which corresponds to the correct time at that other point on Earth where you were actually born.

      You'd need to add some logic to handle leap years. Not just for people born on the 29th of Febuary. You might even get situation where someone being born on the 31st December, in a leap year, i.e. day 366 would confuse some software.

    136. Re:Outlook 2003 by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      I already knew that, thank you very much. That still doesn't make it great design for a small app to depend on the libraries of its own desktop environment.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    137. Re:Outlook 2003 by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      KDE is a great example of what is right with OSS! The fact that you can actually CHOOSE to use it or not to use it is what makes it better. I had a previous computer that had 256 MB of RAM (some of which was given to graphics). Needless to say it did not do well with either Windows XP or Linux + KDE, but Linux + Fluxbox worked pretty well. On this computer with 512 MB or RAM I use KDE because I like it's features. If you are looking for a highly integrated environment, then KDE does a great job.

    138. Re:Outlook 2003 by mad_ian · · Score: 1

      And why are we not using UTC for this situation?

      I set my Servertime to UTC. My client time is Eastern standard/Daylight. Everything works.

      When my client programmes (iCal, thunderbird, etc) save their times to the server, I do no math.

      ~Donald

      --
      ~Donald / Just RTFM
    139. Re:Outlook 2003 by mdecarle · · Score: 1

      I can't applaud or shoot the idea.

      This story brings to mind the words "DLL HELL". they are putting libraries together in the OS, so programs can use them, right? I must assume the system has the builtin possibility to have multiple versions of a given library ?

      Or, I do not understand it completely, could be true as well.

    140. Re:Outlook 2003 by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      Have used Python/Tk in windows? How about Java + Swing? Sounds like a double standard to me.

    141. Re:Outlook 2003 by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Outlook good at least in the corporate setting in which I've used it. I love how people can email you meetings and it'll get put on your schedule and waht not.

      --
      Why not fork?
    142. Re:Outlook 2003 by labratuk · · Score: 1

      Your arguments are perpendicular.

      The reason FOSS applications use 'loads of libs' is for code reuse. If they didn't use libs to perform certain functionality, they would just have to duplicate the functionality with code in the app, which would be your definition of 'coding the same thing over and over'.

      This is what a common libs are for, even if you do think it creates 'bloat' (whatever that actually means).

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    143. Re:Outlook 2003 by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that Evolution is inferior, but that Outlook (2003 espeicially) is so much better. As I said, I use Evolution and am happy with it... but that's only because I'm not using it at work.

      Outlook is much better in a corporate environment because of the scope of its capabilities and ease of use. To avoid being redundant, I'll reference other posts in this this thred, point you to Outlook 2003's assistance page and share with you my pet peeve: Evolution (as well as Thunderbird and every other foss email client I've tried) doesn't have the option to "remove email from server when emptied from Trash" for pop3 email.

    144. Re:Outlook 2003 by NotBorg · · Score: 1

      Dosn't the USN use UCT for everything?

      For many, many, things yes. But some events (i.e. what time we wake up and start work) are relevant to the local time zone. It's much easier to say "I have to get up everyday at 0500" than to say "I have to get up at 2100 GMT and tomorrow when the time zone changes 2200 GMT."

      A change of events could cause us to be in a completely different time zone than originally planed. Let's say I schedule meting to for the 21st of December at 1530 GMT-0 on board the ship. That could be in the middle of the night in the time zone I'll be in for all I know. But if I say that the meeting will be at 1530 relevant to the ship's time zone things become much saner.

      Outlook/Exchange and GMT-0 are only sane when the time zone of the scheduled event is known. For example, you know that your exchange server is in GMT-8 (US West Coast) and you know that a meeting is at 0900 GMT+1 (Rome).

      Contrast that with only knowing what time an event will occur relative to an unknown time zone.

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    145. Re:Outlook 2003 by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1
      Use the "upgrade to large tables" option (introduced in Outlook 97) to fix this. It increases the per folder message limit from 16k to 64k.

      Details here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q197430/

    146. Re:Outlook 2003 by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Stop using M$ slime, and I'll write up that TB extension myself.

    147. Re:Outlook 2003 by BlindRobin · · Score: 1

      Exchange Servers shore based and shipboard servers should be on Zulu time...

    148. Re:Outlook 2003 by stilborne · · Score: 1

      how do you think "everything is a file" works, exactly?

      and trying to blame KDE for the GIMP sucking is a bit unfair. it's like blaming Linus for problems in FreeBSD, or vice versa.

      KDE comes along and solves a long standing issue on the UNIX desktop in a very UNIX-y way (a standard interface to file I/O, regardless of access mechanism, e.g. "everything is a file") and you try and turn that success into a sign of failure because not everyone else got on the bandwagon.

      if it wasn't for the fact that this is slashdot, i'd be amazed.

    149. Re:Outlook 2003 by GraemeDonaldson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As an Exchange sysadmin, if my users are to dumb to not be able to manage their own Out of Office status/reply and need me to do it, then they don't deserve to have the luxury of e-mail.

      --
      I think, therefore I am. I think?
    150. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -I just lost my /. posting virginity

      Hope you enjoyed it, it's the only virginity you'll ever lose.

    151. Re:Outlook 2003 by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      Sounds good to me.

    152. Re:Outlook 2003 by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Have you heard that like OS X, KDE gets faster on the same hardware with every new release?"

      Well I've heard it (from you) but I don't think it's true. I used an old version of KDE on this computer a few years ago, and it was "vaguely mediochre" in performance terms. Now I've put KUbuntu on the same machine, turned off any performance-related options I can find, and it's so slow that it's virtually unusable. 20-30 seconds to load a Konsole window, how is that even possible?

      KDE now is so slow that I thought I'd have to buy a new PC to get it to run. As it turned out, I started using WindowMaker again, which solves the speed problem until you load a KDE application and wait 20 seconds for (example) KPPP to appear.

      And it used to run much less slowly (version shipped with Mandrake 7.x for example), so I'm not yet convinced that KDE is getting any faster.

    153. Re:Outlook 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just more polished. The User Interface is just light-years ahead of Evolution. Just the way everything fits together, meshes... It's hard to quantify exactly what it is, which I have a feeling is probably by design. The millions of dollars that MS dumps into UI research really pays off.

    154. Re:Outlook 2003 by hyc · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. Even sorting messages into subfolders (there are about a dozen subfolders in that archived Inbox, I collapsed the view so they're not in the screenshot) only postpones the inevitable.

      Is it so totally beyond your comprehension that someone may legitimately receive 16,000+ messages all of a particular topic (e.g., a mailing list) that they'd want to save in one place? That is the point of a mail archive, after all.

      The fact that this example is the Inbox is irrelevant. It could have just has easily been my archive of the gnu-gcc mailing list or anything else.

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
    155. Re:Outlook 2003 by vkulkarn · · Score: 1

      Apple's iCal handles timezones correctly. All day events (like birthdays) are simply linked to a date. For other events you can specify the time zone on a per event basis. You do have to check the 'Turn on time zone support' box in the preferences though... but that's just a checkbox.

    156. Re:Outlook 2003 by hacker · · Score: 1
      "Evolution (as well as Thunderbird and every other foss email client I've tried) doesn't have the option to "remove email from server when emptied from Trash" for pop3 email."

      Can you please reference the exact Bugzilla bug number(s) for these issues that you've reported? I'd like to see the details.

    157. Re:Outlook 2003 by hacker · · Score: 1
      "how am I going to open a remote image with gimp ?"


      Gimp has opened remote images for at least the last 3 years that I can recall trying, through the 1.x series and into the 2.x series.

      gimp http://path/to/image/file.png
    158. Re:Outlook 2003 by hyc · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I'm not about to switch back, but it's nice to know there was a fix.

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
    159. Re:Outlook 2003 by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Strange. Exchange doesn't use the Send and Receive mechanism. That's used for POP and Imap mail. This suggests a serious misconfiguration on the part of your administrator.

    160. Re:Outlook 2003 by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I've used them in Mac OS X as well. It still sucks.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    161. Re:Outlook 2003 by spongman · · Score: 1

      I've got one word for ya: Exchange.

      Desktop users are directly connected to the server, so don't need a local copy of their store. laptop/remote users can user 'cached' mode, the authoritative copy of their store is still on the server, but outlook caches an '.OST' (offline store) for use when working offline - dodgy connections are no longer a problem. You get automatic calendar sharing, POP3, IMAP, web-mail & Active Directory integration.

      Backups are a breeze on the server - even microsoft's Backup.exe works fine for most simple plans. You can make Exchange hang on to deleted items for a number of days before removing them permanently from the DB.

    162. Re:Outlook 2003 by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "If all the developers developing functionality in this KDE-only style would put the (wasted) effort into programming this on the OS-level"

      Which OS? Linux? FreeBSD? NetBSD? OpenBSD? Solaris?

    163. Re:Outlook 2003 by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, kindof...

      Let's an amazingly great design: that from Windows GUI. When I try to start Internet Explorer on my Linux system it is quite strimlined... oh, wait...

    164. Re:Outlook 2003 by swmccracken · · Score: 1

      Outlook is trustworthy at what it does - but it's very much a 'one person' program, and thus it's often not the place to store information that's of interest to the company in the long term.

      (It's insane if all the project documentation is stored in a folder in John's Inbox. It really should be stored in somewhere more approprate for such shared information. Once John leaves, or is assigned elsewhere and cleans up his inbox, it's all gone!)

      This is still true if you use any mail program and mail server combination - kmail, Evolution or whatever else.

    165. Re:Outlook 2003 by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      That's not an effective option when the server accounts are limited to 40 MB. Exchange doesn't appear to scale very well. It can't tolerate network latency either. My wife uses cached mode and it sux for email archives of non-trivial size. No one can use it over 802.11b, which doesn't seem to be much of a problem for their IT guy; he doesn't use wireless.

      What annoys me is that both our employers offer Exchange exclusively. IMAP isn't even an option for the 90% of users who don't use server-side calandaring. One of these days I'm gonna write a VB script that pulls mail out of Outlook and presents it as local IMAP or some such, and reduce Outlook to a (superfluous) delivery step, and start using something else for an email client.

    166. Re:Outlook 2003 by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      hehe go Gimp

      but can it do ssh login ?

      no ?

      oh well

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    167. Re:Outlook 2003 by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      > how do you think "everything is a file" works, exactly?

      it works by having user level file systems, I use them all day, every day

      blame who ? why, it doesn't necessarily need kernel modification

      you can even try this LiveCD

      or read the pdf

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    168. Re:Outlook 2003 by Christopher+Cashell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No offense, but that's both crap, and unrealistic.

      I have to manage an Exchange server, and just recently we had a situation where a user was unable to access e-mail in order to set/change their Out of Office reply. The fact that there's no reasonable way for an admin to do that is just stupid. (Yes, there *are* ways to do it, but they are definitely not reasonable).

      Also, in the real world, I'd love to see you tell an executive at the company you work for that they don't deserve e-mail because they're too dumb to manage their own Out of Office status. Somehow I don't think you'd be working there much longer if you did.

      This is one (of many) places where Exchange fails to perform as it should.

      --
      Topher
    169. Re:Outlook 2003 by spongman · · Score: 1

      you must not be talking about the same outlook that I'm using (2003). i'm using cached mode right now over a VPN over possibly the suckiest internet/802.11 connection ever (my VPN has to reconnect once every few minutes) and i've never had any problems.

    170. Re:Outlook 2003 by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Do the issues he's mentioned really sound like bugs to you? To me they sound more like 'lack of features' than bugs.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    171. Re:Outlook 2003 by Peristarkawan · · Score: 1

      I know exactly squat about Plan 9, so correct me if I'm quoting out of context or something, but according to the second site you linked:

      In Plan 9, the kernel mount device mnt(3) acts as a client to the 9P servers mounted in the current name space, translating system calls such as open(2) into 9P transactions such as open(9p). The kernel also multiplexes the potentially many processes onto a single 9P conversation with each server. Finally, the kernel provides each process with its own private name space which it can customize at will. Modern Unix systems do not provide these niceties, so the Unix port of these Plan 9 file servers provides them via other means.

      On Unix, 9P clients do not access servers via the traditional file system call interface. Only the Unix name space can be accessed that way. Instead, 9P clients use the 9pclient(3) library to connect and interact directly with particular 9P servers. The 9p(1) command-line client is useful for interactive use and in shell scripts.

      In other words, it's only in user-space if you're not running Plan 9, in which case it does more or less the same thing that KDE does.

    172. Re:Outlook 2003 by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      How can that be misconfigured?
      You use the Exchange connector, connect to the Exchange server. Person A send message to Person B and hast to wait up to 5 minutes for it to arrive in the Inbox. Hitting Send and Receive sometimes will make it available.

      Another thing that is odd about Outlook 2003 is the fact that send and receive exist as a button which it doesn't in Outlook 2000 when using the Exchange client.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    173. Re:Outlook 2003 by hacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bugzilla, unfortunately carries the string 'Bug' in its title, and gets branded as a bug-only tool. I much prefer Mantis, and both tools contain a "Feature" item in the dropdown... report your "items" as a feature, and let someone else implement/comment on them. Not everything listed in Bugzilla has to be a "bug" in the system. Lack of a key feature can be seen as a bug by some users.

      But my post was actually "bait" to see if the OP had actually mentioned these feature requests anywhere but his rantings on Slashdot. If nobody with the power to implement them sees or hears about them, how does he know anyone wants them?

      I see this all the time with bugs that go unreported. It goes something like this:

      "How come you didn't fix this bug?"

      "Did you report it?"

      "No, you should know every open bug."

      "Please report it so we can track it and be accountable for it."

      "You suck."

      Unfortunately, that's the reality of the matter. If nobody wants to help by reporting bugs, adding their comments and feature requests, providing testing resources (especially on hardware or software that developers such as myself do not have access to), or by sending in patches... things don't improve.

      Many people complain that "Linux usability sucks", but they do nothing to try to solve it. The problem lies in both courts... developer AND user.

    174. Re:Outlook 2003 by cg · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just leave your exchange server set to Zulu (GMT) time?

      Let the end user change their desktop time as needed. This whole process seems unnecessary...

    175. Re:Outlook 2003 by hyc · · Score: 1

      Exchange may work in a corporate environment, but it's certainly not a reasonable solution for a home user.

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
    176. Re:Outlook 2003 by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      I assumed he uses some app to run X11 applications remotely. That's the first thing that comes to mind when someone says they run "X".

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    177. Re:Outlook 2003 by LANjackal · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, brother. I use Outlook 2K3, also. Legally bought and owned. Fantastic interface, awesome spam filter, works with everything I need.

    178. Re:Outlook 2003 by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1

      *sigh* that's what I get for not proofreading :(

    179. Re:Outlook 2003 by Icco · · Score: 1

      Outlook also works great. theres not much wrong w/ evo besides the fact that its buggy and not very smooth. the one thing they both could work on though is todo lists.

      --
      -- There is a fine line betwen genius and insanity, i have erased that line.
    180. Re:Outlook 2003 by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      yes, you have it right

      I might have been a bit harsh on the KDE people =)

      It's the cruft that is Unix and its derivatives, dead and getting smelly.

      And I bang on about it at every opportunity to anyone who will listen because I know there are better solutions, they are easy to implement but the free unices people play NIH and so great ideas fall by the wayside. I know that Linus has little respect for the plan9 people, we've seen it in his comments on our mailing list. FreeBSD could have done it with geode but they missed a trick. Theo just wants our compilers but the Lucent lawyers won't relent and let him have it with an OBSD compatible license.

      Oh well, one day perhaps you'll get the chance to have real usabability.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    181. Re:Outlook 2003 by Aaron+Pannell · · Score: 1

      It also could really use the ability to move an event from one calendar to another (or at least copy it). You can already do this. Cut the event you want to move, select the calendar you want to move it into in the box in the upper left of the screen, paste the event in.

      --
      "We can't stop here! This is bat country."
    182. Re:Outlook 2003 by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      That is my point. There are going to be a variety of software available on a every platform that may result in diffent looks and ideas. If you are looking for standards there are lots of them, just do not plan on everyone using the same standard that you use.

    183. Re:Outlook 2003 by bobalien · · Score: 1

      Outlook's such an obvious answer... it's a great program (especially coupled with an Exchange server and Project server - which do get a bit pricey...) everyone's so set in their "free"/open software (read: anti "M$") ways they overlook the fact that they do make a couple solid products

    184. Re:Outlook 2003 by skelly · · Score: 1

      Well, you could always learn to count backwards or forwards from the time zone in which your pc is set. Or, you could just switch to linux and create an application to do just that. Or, how about just give some help to the Sunbird project?

      --
      Romanes eunt domus? People called Romanes, they go the 'ouse? It says Romans go home. No it doesn't. What's Latin fo
    185. Re:Outlook 2003 by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the software for a given platform ought to be consistent -- and I don't consider KDE to be a platform. The platform is X, damnit!

      Apps on Windows should look and act like Windows apps, apps on Mac OS ought to be like Cocoa apps, and apps on anything that uses X as its GUI ought to look like X apps. Of course, this means there needs to be a [higher-level] standard X toolkit, which is exactly the point. I don't care if it's Qt or GTK (or something else), but the community needs to just pick one!

      (Java apps ought to use SWT or whatever, so that they emulate the platform they're being run on as closely as possible -- I hate seeing the class name in the menu bar on OS X!)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    186. Re:Outlook 2003 by sapbasisnerd · · Score: 1

      Give me a groupware calendar that handles multiple timezones please! I know this will induce shudders, but this is something that Lotus Notes does handle very well. Can't personally say a lot else nice about Notes but time zone handling in the Calendar is excellent.

    187. Re:Outlook 2003 by ccp · · Score: 1

      Well, since it looks like we are just in the middle of The Mother of All Astroturf Campaigns, we'll have to wait a little to find out.

      Cheers,

      Carlos Cesar

    188. Re:Outlook 2003 by maitas · · Score: 1

      TrueSync is great. I use IntelliSync for YAHOO and keep my calendar and ToDo on my Yahoo acount syncronized with my Palm, OutLook and CellPhone easely...
      If I'm away from any of my devices, I only need a browswer with Yahoo access (all public libraries do) to read my Calendar.

    189. Re:Outlook 2003 by stilborne · · Score: 1

      > I might have been a bit harsh on the KDE people =)

      i appreciate this clarification =) yeah, plan9 has a number of great ideas, and there are several things in KDE that are directly inspired by them. taj has said publicly more than once that KStandardDirs was directly inspired by plan9, for instance.

    190. Re:Outlook 2003 by nihilogos · · Score: 1

      Very perceptive of you. Like it.

      --
      :wq
    191. Re:Outlook 2003 by ccp · · Score: 1

      Thanks

    192. Re:Outlook 2003 by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      Can I do that without an exchange server? They tend to be costly.

      --
      Bottles.
    193. Re:Outlook 2003 by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      ah, that works, thanks.

      I do wish it was as simple as changing it in the selection box (they gray it out once it has been added to the calendar the first time)

      --
      Bottles.
    194. Re:Outlook 2003 by budgenator · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, when D-bus start really coming online, all of the K[foo] stuff will actualy be able to be integrated with all of the G[foo].

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    195. Re:Outlook 2003 by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Cool, never noticed that before, now I'll have to check PS, if it's not there I'll have something else to rag on my son about in the Gimp vs. PS thing.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    196. Re:Outlook 2003 by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Well, good! I know Freedesktop.org is doing some great things in this area, and frankly, I think they're the best (and only) hope of having a unified, sensible architecture for the *nix desktop. But, it's not there yet...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    197. Re:Outlook 2003 by Da+VinMan · · Score: 1

      ...but Office 2k3 seems to run faster than Office XP, with more features

      I'm going to have to vouch for that as well. I keep Word mapped to Ctrl-Alt-W for quick clipboard paste spell checks and the like. By the time my finger is back on the spacebar, Word is up. Granted, that's the way "it should be", but little stuff like that makes using Office so much more of a pleasure that I even dumped Office 2000 in favor of Office 2003 (which I said I would never do as I didn't really need the new features in 2003).

      YMMV of course....

      --
      Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  2. pen and paper by IEBEYEBALL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    pen and paper, and sometimes pen on the back of my hand.

    --
    -- SKYKING, SKYKING, DO NOT ANSWER.
    1. Re:pen and paper by baomike · · Score: 1

      Mod parent WAY up.

      Paper calendars are portable, no problem with battery life, easy to use , etc ...

    2. Re:pen and paper by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Try scheduling a meeting for a dozen people from different departments that way.

    3. Re:pen and paper by gui_tarzan2000 · · Score: 1
      We get this really cool paper calendar from our local hardware store. It has room for everything we get involved in, requires no electricity, never crashes, is portable, has no annoying alarm that goes off at the most inopportune times, etc. It hangs on the wall where everyone can see it and doesn't require ink - a pencil works very well.

      I don't ever want my life to get complicated enough to require a daytimer or a PDA that tells me where to be when...

      --
      Have you hugged your penguin today?
    4. Re:pen and paper by starX · · Score: 1

      I prefer pencil and paper as it allows you to more easily change appointments, but for writing on the back of your hand nothing beats good old fashioned black sharpie.

    5. Re:pen and paper by Vraeden · · Score: 1

      I use my palm. I reserve my arm for artwork.

    6. Re:pen and paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a solution to that. It's called a "secretary".

    7. Re:pen and paper by julesh · · Score: 1

      Simple -- send everyone an e-mail asking "is this time OK?", if they send one back saying it isn't, try again with a time that they suggest. Repeat until you have a time agreed, send confirmation e-mails and write it in your diary.

      If you're working with external contractors, who are likely to be using a calendaring system that won't automatically interoperate with your own, it's the only way you can make it work anyway.

    8. Re:pen and paper by julesh · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Until I can get a PDA that measures 8cmx10cm, is just 1cm thick, doesn't need batteries charging/replacing for an entire year, and doesn't have a convoluted user interface, I think I'll stick with my pocket diary.

  3. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't.

  4. Outlook by Mockingbird · · Score: 1, Redundant

    *shrug* stone me, whatever. It does what I need to do and synchs nicely with my ppc.

  5. outlook by jbplou · · Score: 1

    at work outlook, at home nothing(perhaps why I'm disorganized)

  6. The only Calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iCal. ...or the brain. Brains tend to work well. And..you don't even have to type anything!

  7. Three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pen plus Arm

  8. notepad by shikra · · Score: 1

    notepad.exe

    1. Re:notepad by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      Is that the one you download from http://notepad.org/ ?
      If so, that's what I use.
      If not, I still use it. I'm too lazy to go to %WindowsSysPath%\Notepad.exe myself.

  9. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the same $10 calendar I buy at Staples every year?

  10. Kalarm by Codename_V · · Score: 1

    Kalarm is all I ever need to keep track of things.

    --
    Free will is just an illusion
    1. Re:Kalarm by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. I don't know how it compares to the other options, but kalarm does the job for me.

    2. Re:Kalarm by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      Me too! The only organisation task that I need is simple reminders.

  11. Maybe just me... by rampant+mac · · Score: 1
    but what software does the slashdot community use to schedule? How do you keep track of your various appointments?

    .Mac?

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  12. Korganizer by dangermen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Korganizer as part of Kontact does a decent job and it actually integrates with Exchange.

    1. Re:Korganizer by Nasarius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I love Korganizer and Kontact, but I'm still looking for a decent Windows program that supports the vCalendar format. I dual boot by necessity, so it's frustrating. I've looked at a few online calendar apps, including Yahoo's stuff, but it's not great. I can't wait for Sunbird.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:Korganizer by xerid · · Score: 0, Redundant

      K'm Kretty Kick Kf Khe Khole Lts-KDE-Ko-Kverything-Kas-Ko-Ktart-K-Kucking-K Khing. Kt's Kot Kute Knymore, Kuys.

    3. Re:Korganizer by rampant+mac · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Korganizer as part of Kontact does a decent job and it actually integrates with Exchange."

      Shouldn't that be: "Korganizer Kas Kpart Kof Kontact Kdoes Ka Kdecent Kjob Kand Kit Kactually Kintegrates Kwith Kexchange."

      bork bork bork?

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    4. Re:Korganizer by numbski · · Score: 1

      Say huh?

      I'm not arguing with you. I've simply never tried it, but my understanding was that in order to use calendaring (or even mail and all the interesting features like delegates and share permissions, etc) required a native MAPI client. Am I wrong about this?

      If what you say is true, this is pretty huge for me. I need to get cracking and research it a bit further.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    5. Re:Korganizer by ShineyMcShine · · Score: 1

      Like any piece of software, it's far from perfect not perfect! let's get off slashdot and make some perfect software! ;)

    6. Re:Korganizer by xrayspx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, you don't need a MAPI client, but prepare for the slowness. Evolution does a very nice job of interoperating with Exchange 2000 and up, but it relies on Outlook Web Access to do it. Overall, it's about the same speed as accessing an IMAP server.

      I have no idea how Kontact does it, but that's as good a guess as any.

    7. Re:Korganizer by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Evolution? Do give it a try. I have found Evolution to be really, really slick.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    8. Re:Korganizer by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Same here. I just started using it, let's see.. on march 17(grin) for personal use and it's been working great. I haven't tried Exchange integration. The integration with kontact works well, so I swapped it with kmail (also integrated in kontact) on my taskbar.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    9. Re:Korganizer by BlueLightning · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that joke never gets old.

    10. Re:Korganizer by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's so wrong having an easy way to point out that an app is KDE. We should all use names as non-descriptive as possible.

      And BTW the K is not always at the beginning.

    11. Re:Korganizer by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      For Windows? After a bit of Googling, I found a couple in-progress ports, but not even a beta version for download.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    12. Re:Korganizer by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be Kbork Kbork Kbork?

    13. Re:Korganizer by d^2b · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, surprisingly enough, KDE is not required. There is a project call korganizer-pi (pi=platform independant) that runs without KDE. Indeed, it runs on Windows. The UI is a little less slick than the latest Korganizer, but it does e.g., allow me to sync my laptop and my zaurus to a server via ssh.

    14. Re:Korganizer by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "I use Korganizer synced with a palm for my scheduling"

      Me too, and it's great!

      "Like any piece of software, it's far from perfect"

      And yet, only problems I see its Knode's problems that makes it growing the window beyond the screen limit from time to time, and Karm still not integrating properly with Korganizer so timings and subtasks don't appear within ToDo list or the calendar window (well, you can kind of hack it out, but then you are risking the integrity of karm's ics file).

      I do want to believe those that say Outlook 2003 is such a great app but:
      1/ I can't use it except on a single propietary OS (I don't think vendor locking can help me too much).
      2/ I can't properly use it to its full extent except with a single propietary groupware server (I don't think vendor locking and proprietary data formats can help me too much).
      3/ I don't miss anything too important on my current solution (and it doesn't impose me a single vendor, it uses publicly avaliabe data formats, and it is open source and free as in free speech and as in free beer too).

  13. Killer Calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terrifying.

  14. I use Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I'm 1337 and I have a good memory (for all the console commands) so I just remember what I need to-do ( which is usually just getting new kernal 8-| )

  15. To Do List by WordNA · · Score: 1

    1. Write down things to do on paper 2. Recycle Paper 3. ??? 4. Have done the things to do?

  16. I use my PDA by prockcore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously. Until I can safely and securely use a remote calendar cross-platform (OSX and Linux and Windows), I'm going to stick with the PDA.

    1. Re:I use my PDA by joefish_only_1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Same here. I have a p910 which is nice. I would use something on my computer, but I don't take that everywhere I go (yes, it is a laptop).

    2. Re:I use my PDA by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      I would use mine but it isnt allowed on the premises at work. Damn security policy :(

    3. Re:I use my PDA by ian+rogers · · Score: 1

      The only obvious solution - Quit.

    4. Re:I use my PDA by fthiess · · Score: 1

      Already available: I use Mozilla Calendar to access, via WebDAV and SSL, an iCalendar file stored on a remote server, protected by Apache's Digest Authentication. Because of WebDAV I can get at (and update) my calendar from anywhere; because of SSL it's secure from eavsdropping; because of the authentication, only I, or people I authorize, can access it. Works great! Plus, you can use any iCalendar-aware client (not just Mozilla/SunBird). The downside: I had to know how to set up WebDAV and know a little about iCalendar. That's not a huge hurdle, but its enough to keep most non-geeks from being able to set it up.

    5. Re:I use my PDA by iosmart · · Score: 1

      Wait...how do you safely use software?

    6. Re:I use my PDA by theblackdeer · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Pocket PC 2003, Outlook 2003 on my laptop. Wireless at work, and wifi on my Dell Axim X30.

      I rarely need to open my notebook away from work anymore. I get a call (dentist appt reminder, whatnot) and I jot it down in my PDA. The roaming Exchange Activesync is actually quite nice. I don't use my cradle at work for syncing, only for charging. The PDA syncs wirelessly every 30 minutes at work, and when I'm on my notebook I get those reminders. When I'm out and about, the audio alarm sounds to let me know when I should be somewhere else.

      The main trick is to keep dropping it in the cradle to charge it; other than that, the combo of wifi and seamless syncing really is killer.

      PS: I secretly run SUSE 9.1 on a second partion on my notebook. Don't tell my boss! He hates OSS.

    7. Re:I use my PDA by digitect · · Score: 1

      Me too. I used Day Timer paper products for years, and then DayTimer software for 4-5 years after that. It got dropped about the same time I bought my first Palm, and the Palm Desktop software is still the most useful thing I've found. It doesn't have all the categorization capabilities the old DTO had, but as I've gotten older I've realized that minutia is less important than big picture. Palm OS and Desktop do that extremely well. Plus, Desktop is free for for Windows. (Still haven't found a trustworthy Linux clone that didn't eat all my data yet, though.)

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    8. Re:I use my PDA by DualG5GUNZ · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I have to use Outlook on occassion. However, on the Mac, I am certain you can export from iCal to a format that Outlook can handle and pretty sure that you can make iCal default to using whatever that 'universal' calender file type is. Also, iCal can open Outlook's files. That'd solve the problem for Mac/PC users. Also, iCal syncs up with Palm PDAs via iSync and /or hotsync (bridging the gap between Mac, Palm, and potentially PC users).

      --
      "I'm a philosophy major. That means I can think deep thoughts about being unemployed." -- Bruce Lee
    9. Re:I use my PDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. Until I can safely and securely use a remote calendar cross-platform (OSX and Linux and Windows), I'm going to stick with the PDA.



      Securely access your calendar?! Oh no! People might realize that you have a 11:00am meeting in the Conservatory! The travesty!!!
    10. Re:I use my PDA by MacJedi · · Score: 1

      This is true, but not everything is roses yet-- Apple's calendar.app, for example, has some problems with the full iCalendar specification such as being able to both subscribe to AND edit a remote ics file (at least with 10.3, are things fixed now?)

      As an aside why is it that Apache doesn't implement versioning-- you know, the V in DAV?

      --
      2^5
    11. Re:I use my PDA by George+Beech · · Score: 1

      Then the answer for you is Novell GroupWise, the client Runs on OS X, Linux, or Windows. And ther server can be run on either Linux or Netware.

    12. Re:I use my PDA by spizkapa · · Score: 1

      Indeed, sticking with the PDA is my choice as well. But, one thing you could try is the GPE project http://gpe.handhelds.org/ which makes a wonderful set of applications including PIM, calendar, to-do lists etc and runs on top of either familiar Linux http://familiar.handhelds.org/ which works on Ipaqs and many other devices or openzaurus http://www.openzaurus.org/ which is, again, Linux-based and works for the popular Sharp Zaurus PDAs. Depending on how much you've spent on your PDA, you may be able to run a 2.6 series kernel or a 2.4 series for devices with less power like my Sharp Zaurus 5500. As a bonus, all GPE apps run natively on x86 Linux so you can run them on your desktop machine too.

    13. Re:I use my PDA by Goeland86 · · Score: 2, Informative

      you are right that the PDA is the best.
      Even better, to my mind, is that Linux (thus probably OS X, not sure) has a clone of Palm Desktop software: jpilot!
      That program does everything I need it to do: to-do list, address book, calendar...
      And it syncs with any Palm PDA. I love it, and wish there was one for windows.
      Outlook seriously bugs me, though I know that Jpilot doesn't have anything close to an Exchange server (because the PDAs don't use them to start with).
      So for small needs, a PDA, or PDA syncing app will do just fine!

      --
      ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
    14. Re:I use my PDA by zCyl · · Score: 1

      1. Quit
      2. ...
      3. Profit!

    15. Re:I use my PDA by scarolan · · Score: 1

      I also use my PDA, which unfortunately *still* will not sync properly with my Linux computer. I have an older Handspring visor (Palm OS), and tried every linux-based sync program that I could find including gnome-pilot, jpilot, kpilot, etc. None of them get it right every time.

      With Gnome-Pilot and Evolution it seemed to be working, until evey so often it woudl freak out and create thousands of blank appointments which I could either A. Delete one at a time with the stylus or B. Hard reset my PDA and delete *everything*. Well that was not going to work for me, so I abandoned Evolution and gnome-pilot for jpilot.

      Jpilot seemed to be exactly what I was looking for - smaller footprint, pretty easy to use, etc. But after a couple of weeks of use it stopped transferring new appointments and todos to and from the Palm. I even tried deleting the ~/.jpilot directory and re-syncing everything but the problem remained.

      Now I'm on to kpilot which seems to work ok, but for some reason has no MAL conduit, so I can't sync AvantGo unless I use one of the other two. The other problem with this one is that I use Gnome and it's very KDE-centric (eg, only syncs with Kontact, etc)

      I wish Palm would come out with a good linux client that didn't delete or duplicate records. I think next time I upgrade my computer I'll get a Mac and just be done with it.

    16. Re:I use my PDA by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      What about KDE PIM and it's KPilot component? Works wonders for me...

      --
      Help us build a better map!
  17. Schedule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use my newton 2100 ...

    1. Re:Schedule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GEEK!!!

  18. So far... by Tavor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothing I've seen beats the Paper calander. Customizable notes, available with any wallpaper you could ask for, and quirky quotes available upon request. User can edit most all of the interface by writing, cutting, and/or pasting objects into the suqres and into the pictures. Beat that, Outlook 2003!

    --
    Windows has detected an undetectable error.
    1. Re:So far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth. Paper Calendar and my Memory is all I will ever need.

    2. Re:So far... by CausticPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Beat that, Outlook 2003!

      Easy. Your method sucks at the office, when you need to schedule a meeting of about 10 people at a time when everybody is free (you need to look at THEIR calendars) and find a conference room that is available for that time period, then track RSVP's. And you have to assume that everybody else actually writes all their own appointments on their calendars.

      That's a LOT of phone calls, walking around to cubicles, and collecting post-it notes. And then you're gonna wind up fighting over a room anyway with the other folks who got there first.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    3. Re:So far... by Al+Dimond · · Score: 0, Troll

      But it's such detachment. I'm going to look at your calendar and set you up an appointment with me. I'm going to log in to the server and look up your information. I don't care how productive it is to set up meetings like that, it's not human.

      Me, all I use is my brains. If I miss meeting you, it probably wasn't important to me anyway. Well, that's a pretty big exaggeration. But seriously. Humanity above productivity.

    4. Re:So far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. I think I'll throw away my cell phone. It's so inhuman talking to other people without meeting them face to face the natural way. If I don't try hard enough to find you, what I had to say probably wasn't that important anyway.

    5. Re:So far... by christoph_s · · Score: 1

      my father used a paper calendar until i changed him to a combination of outlook and a nokia communicator 3 years ago. the paper way was great, but the chances of him losing all his data without a means of backup was just too great. the company would have had a real problem when his paper booklet would have gone missing. if he loses the communicator, i'll buy a new one and synchronize with outlook.

    6. Re:So far... by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      We have a bunch of people at work that take appointments and schedule appointments for each other. It's a situation where half the office seems to have access to each others calendars. We use Outlook/Exchange, not the simplest of calendar systems, and none of the users are particularly savy (several only use computers at work). Anyways, we periodically encounter a problem where some user will delete a schedule-appointments-here reoccurence or do something else and end up deleting 1/3 of their appointments (or someone else's) for weeks at a time and then somehow not notice for a week. Of course, any time this happens, it's always, "Exchange ate my appointments again!"

      Anyways, we've come close to just throwing it all away and using paper where there's virtually no opportunity to screw up short of physically losing the schedule.

    7. Re:So far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I end up having to do all the legwork at the office anyway, because people's Outlook calendars are never correct. They write down appointments and then don't update when the circumstances change, so you still (at least where I work) have to call up all 10 people, get them all on board, book the conference room... Blech.

      I agree with the poster who said that using technology for calendaring was simply using technology for technology's sake -- no program will ever be able to conquer human disorganization.

    8. Re:So far... by torokun · · Score: 1

      First, let me say, I use paper because it makes me PROACTIVE. Counterintuitively, polling is often more efficient for humans because it makes us proactive rather than reactive. It makes us plan ahead rather than wait for a bell to ring.

      Now, even if you use a paper calender, as I do, you can use email or something like outlook to handle the things they do best.

      Finding a free spot in time for a meeting is a one-time task. Once it's set, all you need to do is write it in your calendar.

      The vast majority of meetings are between 2 people. Where there are more, often it's because someone's visiting a place on a previously set schedule, so basically the time has to be set for their itinerary (e.g. a client).

      Furthermore, most of the time the meeting has to be done in the space of a few days or a week anyway, to avoid blocking other tasks, so there's not that big a problem space anyway.

      The few remaining cases where you need to schedule a meeting for more than 3 people can be solved by:

      0. plan ahead so people's schedules are not full when you ask for a meeting.

      1. emailing the people and asking if time x is ok, and if not, what ranges are best.

      2. if that doesn't work, poll them with your free times and let them choose, via email or other system (e.g. outlook, evite).

      3. if that doesn't work, choose the best time and ask the others to change their plans.

    9. Re:So far... by dkf · · Score: 1
      Your method sucks at the office, when you need to schedule a meeting of about 10 people at a time when everybody is free

      Bah, that's a real troll just there. In my experience, finding a time when all of 10 people are really free for a meeting is impossible in the first place (to say nothing of the complexity of organizing a meeting across multiple timezones distributed evenly around the world, which is the usual case for my meetings, alas.) The best way to deal with this is to just book things to be convenient for yourself (if not for you, who should it be convenient for?) and accept apologies from those people who can't make it. And make sure someone takes good minutes, of course; reading the minutes lets those who missed the meeting get up to speed.
      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    10. Re:So far... by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

      The few remaining cases where you need to schedule a meeting for more than 3 people can be solved by:

      0. plan ahead so people's schedules are not full when you ask for a meeting.

      1. emailing the people and asking if time x is ok, and if not, what ranges are best.

      2. if that doesn't work, poll them with your free times and let them choose, via email or other system (e.g. outlook, evite).

      3. if that doesn't work, choose the best time and ask the others to change their plans.


      Holy crap! And how long does it take to do all of that to schedule one meeting?

      Most of our meetings are with 5 or more people. You MUST schedule them in advance, and schedule them around other people's meetings, and there's no hope of booking a conference room (space is limited!) unless you get it at least 3 days in advance. And when you have development meeting with operations regarding load testing or a production release, you can't just have some people skip the meeting and read the minutes.

      Outlook shows you everybody's calendar on a grid, and you can see at a quick glance when everybody is free as well as what conference rooms are available at what times. It also makes it easy to set up and track recurring meetings, which can be somewhat of a pain with a paper calendar. Some meetings are weekly, some are bi-weekly, others might be daily, and then of course your various monthly meetings. And if you're meeting with different departments, they will have their OWN monthly/weekly/biweekly meetings you'll have to schedule around.

      So, using outlook, it takes all of 2 minutes to set up a meeting of 10 people, in different departments, in a time slot that you know they are all available, and book a conference room.

      How long would that take if you polled all of them in an email, asked if they can do a meeting at such-and-such time, asked for other available ranges, and then coordinate a meeting based on 10 people's responses, and then try to find a conference room that's available? Much longer than 2 minutes I'd say. You'd need a secretary to handle it for you, because you aren't able to perform any real work while you're scheduling meetings.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  19. Well usually... by ROFLMAObot · · Score: 0

    I write stuff down on bits of paper and stuff them into my pocket.

  20. Korganizer by hardaker · · Score: 4, Informative
    I use Korganizer synced with a palm for my scheduling. It works quite well. Like any piece of software, it's far from perfect. But I'm continually impressed with what I can pull off with it. I really like being able to link in other schedules as well and have them available from a checkbox to display them or not. I have the fedora release schedule pulled from HTTP, my wifes schedule copied to my machine hourly from hers... Lets me quickly overlay multiple things.

    To make sure I look at it, my login session opens it whenever I log into my machine (and I do shutdown nightly just to start clean though it's hardly necessary). A cron job to open it every morning would be just as helpful.

    Obviously, this needs at least some level of KDE installed.

    --
    The next site to slashdot will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and start slashdotting it early!
  21. Yahoo! Calendar by TeleoMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Works for me. Email. Calendar. meh.

    --
    $6.21 is the number of the beast before sales tax. Meh.
    1. Re:Yahoo! Calendar by EdA · · Score: 1

      I use this too - my wife and I can synchronize our schedules and the kids' appointments/soccer games, etc. And its usable from any PC, any OS... /Ed

    2. Re:Yahoo! Calendar by eggoeater · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yahoo Calendar rocks. I can access it from home and work (two different computers), it will sync up with my Palm (although the sync is a little kludgey), has a to-do list, etc., and the calendar sends me a text message (via an email address) to my cell phone to remind me of appointments.

      Way fricken cool. I'll never go back to a non-web based calendar.

    3. Re:Yahoo! Calendar by gathas · · Score: 1
      Having a networked based calendar is really great. I also love how I can keep my work and personal items in a single calendar and well as overlay with my spouses calendar (+ 4 boys).

      I just need two things now:

      1) An extension to thunderbird that parses outlook meeting requests and presents a button to add them to my yahoo calendar. It would be nice if Yahoo supported some standard along this line.

      2) Always available network access from multiple devices. Syncing sucks. It would be great to have high speed access to my yahoo stuff from a phone, use that calendar and address book directly without syncing.

    4. Re:Yahoo! Calendar by dooglio · · Score: 1

      I agree. I've been using it for years. I love the email feature.

    5. Re:Yahoo! Calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's the easiest way to use a calendar.

      Just one tips for people who are using non-english version of Yahoo! Calendar... If you want the program to sync Yahoo! Calendar/address book/to do with you Pocket PC devices... you need to switch your account to english then you will get the link to download the program (Intellisync)! :-/
      or follow this link

      http://calendar.yahoo.com/?v=120&pv=61

      The sync is ok if you configure it to do it one way only... else, you can get some duplication sometimes.

      It's really interesting and easy of use. You can get reminder by e-mail or sms.
      You can publish publicly some parts of your calendar.
      You can share your calendar with other users
      And you don't need your computer to add an appointment or any thing else... only a web access.

    6. Re:Yahoo! Calendar by LisaSays · · Score: 1

      Although Outlook has some great functions for an office environment where everyone else uses it as well, Yahoo Calendar can't be beat for people who switch locations/computers often (e.g. school, work, home). Also, its reminder functions are the easiest to use--I haven't missed a birthday since I started using it three years ago.

    7. Re:Yahoo! Calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo! address book also rocks. The key feature for me is that you can import and export your entire address book in many different formats. I use "Yahoo! CSV" format for occaisonal backups because it is fairly human readable and you can edit it easily with Excel. I use LDIF format to export my address book to Thunderbird. Gmail, unfortunately, puts your address info into a data prison -- which is why I still haven't gone to Gmail. I've gotten burned by data prisons before. Once you put your info into Gmail you can't get it back out again.

  22. My arm. by filterchild · · Score: 1

    I find that using my left arm as a to do list functions quite well. I just write everything i have to do, and every morning, when I shower, I clean my arm off so that I have a few minutes of blissful nothingness before I get to work.

    1. Re:My arm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And every morning when you what?

  23. paper! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep my todo list and calendar that travels with me - always accessible even when away from power, more reliable than a palm device, easily handles exceptional scheduling cases.

    1. Re:paper! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      What do you do for events that occur the second Wednesday of each calendar quarter? Believe it or not, I have one such case :)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:paper! by Enahs · · Score: 1

      An idea: You could use a modified version of a tickler file.

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
  24. iCal by thedogcow · · Score: 1

    iCal.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:iCal by mr100percent · · Score: 2, Informative

      hear hear. I can even publish it to web, and sync it to my other Macs and Palm, and let others subscribe to it in their iCals.

    2. Re:iCal by mr100percent · · Score: 2, Informative

      iPod and Palm syncing too!

    3. Re:iCal by Darth+Maul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amen to that. iCal is perfect. I keep my calendars remote on my Linux server (webdav), too. The iCal interface is just right; nothing gets in the way. I can also sync right to my iPod.

      Of course this assumes you have a OS X machine around... But try it out sometime at an Apple store or something if you don't have a Mac zealot friend ;).

      --
      --- witty signature
    4. Re:iCal by carney1979 · · Score: 0

      If decent hardware for the Mac didn't cost in excess of $1400 to $1500 dollars I would.

      SOME of us are on a budget, but our requirements are more than a Mac Mini....

      David

    5. Re:iCal by JimGardner1973 · · Score: 1

      iCal is good, but as someone has already pointed out you can't add to a calender 'owned' by someone else. I wanted to add TV schedule times to the Formula One Grand Prix iCal I subscribe to and I couldn't because I did'nt create it, which is dumb because my local copy of it should be 'mine' to alter, I didn't want everyone else to see my changes - although the idea of being able to do this if I had some sort of administrative privilages would be a nice update hopfully Apple have already thought of.

      --
      http://electricguitarlessons.blogspot.com
  25. Blackbook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what program slashdotter's use to keep track of girls phone numbers?

    1. Re:Blackbook? by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      I think it's the one with the smallest disk usage.

    2. Re:Blackbook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason I first read your post as;

      "I think it's the one with the smallest dick usage"

      I was like "damn thats just mean".

  26. seriously by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    to keep track of your todo stuff and your notes you can use keynote. Not the Mac app, but the keynote from http://www.tranglos.com/free/keynote.html windows. I like yahoo calendar for appointments if you are always connected and checking email frequently.

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

    1. Re:seriously by MTO_B. · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks...
      This looks like somethinig I could use :-)

      (Note to others: it's not a calendar, more like a notepad with multiple files/trees).

  27. Emacs Diary by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ow! Stop hitting me!

    Seriously though, the Emacs diary is pretty flexible, can be configured to give reminders of events and actually works pretty well as long as you have emacs up all the time. I like it better than anything else I've run across. The old PalmOS diary was pretty useful, too, but my last PalmPilot died a couple of years ago and I haven't found a PDA to replace it yet. I'm thinking of writing a webapp for calendar events and hooking it up to Asterisk to call my cellphone with reminders (Use festival for TTS or something like that *vague handwave*)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Emacs Diary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't just text messaging your phone be easier? I do it for reminders, and warning/errors in my server logs.

    2. Re:Emacs Diary by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Yeah it would, but since I'm playing with asterisk at the moment anyway it's not easier by much. Setting asterisk up to send a .wav file to a phone number is extremely straight forward once you have it set up to connect to the PSTN. I'm going through iconnecthere and once I got the config files set up so I could call out to the PSTN via linphone (linphone connects to asterisk and asterisk routes it to ICH,) adding the functionality to send a pre-recorded .wav file took all of about 5 minutes. Using festival to generate a .wav file from text is also simple, so I may as well do something neat :-)

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:Emacs Diary by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Throw in planner-mode with its Gnus integration and it's nifty Wiki-fied plans and you have a pretty nice set of tools. Since I already spend most of my day in Emacs adding one more function just makes sense. As for your reminder system. Why not just have Emacs send your phone an email... Sure, plain text isn't nearly as cool as a computerized voice telling you that you are late, but it's much easier to script.

    4. Re:Emacs Diary by Alien_Phreak · · Score: 1

      I will try emacs once they provide me two foot pedals that allow me to actually make that damn app work. I'm biased towards VI as far as editors go. there are some feature i wish vi would have that emacs does have. But unless i grow two more arms, I find that application ridiculously difficult to control.

      My 2 cents.

      Alien.

  28. My To Do List Is... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Post-It Notes.

    1. Re:My To Do List Is... by ROFLMAObot · · Score: 0

      You post your schedules? Ha ha ha?

    2. Re:My To Do List Is... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure! On a Post-It Note, I write:

      Morning - Read Slashdot
      Afternoon - Read Slashdot
      Evening - Read Slashdot

      Note: Time to look for job? Not today.

    3. Re:My To Do List Is... by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty good to-do list application, but it really shines as a password management tool.

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    4. Re:My To Do List Is... by ColMustard · · Score: 1

      Seriously, Post-it notes rock. I use Stickies.app which allows virtual post-it notes! Well okay, I should also say that I don't have a very complex life to manage.

      --
      Moof.
  29. Calendar = Outlook by cob666 · · Score: 1

    Outlook 2003, synchronizes with both my PDA (Pocket PC) and my cell phone (BlackBerry).
    I also use software that allows me to share contacts and calendar information with my GF.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
  30. For OS X: Entourage 2004 by newdamage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I gave the Mail/iCal/Address Book combo a shot when I first bought my iBook a year ago, but it just didn't do everything I was looking for and I didn't like having to keep 3 apps open at the same time.

    I've been using Entourage since Office 2004 can out for Mac. It's great, the mail client, calendar, to do list, and address book all integrate nicely. It really simplies all the things I need to do to stay organized.

    While I'm not sure it's worth the high price of Office, if you can get it through a campus agreement (like I did) for under $20, I'd recommend it.

    --
    ce n'est pas un Sig.
  31. meh by Vacant+Mind · · Score: 0, Funny

    The wife just reminds me

  32. Outlook, for understanding words as well as dates by Scott+Tracy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's about the only PIM I've seen that can handle things like 'tomorrow', 'a week Friday' or 'next Thursday' in a date field and figure it out for you. Makes entering appointments and tasks quicker and more intuitive for me.

  33. Decidedly low-tech by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I sometimes stick personal appointments into my Outlook calendar at work, but for the most part, I simply don't keep a to-do list or a datebook or anything like that.

    I've found over the years that if I start compiling things into a "to-do" list or a schedule, then I'm more inclined (not less) to miss things or not do things, because they have officially become more of a nuissance by being on a list of things I feel obligated to do. When I just keep track of things mentally instead, then it doesn't feel like it's hanging over my head all the time and I feel like I can do it whenever I damn well please, which makes it more likely to actually get done.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    1. Re:Decidedly low-tech by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I also lean towards the philosophy that if I can't remember I need to do something, but can remember to do 10 other things, the 10 other things are probably more important anyway. This strategery also has the benefit that stupid useless tasks sometimes drop off the map unless the user has some degree of persistence. For example, when a user finds an 8 year old $60 inkjet in a closet somewhere and decides they want it in their office as a personal printer even though we have about 1 networked laser printer for every 3 people (including some color), then I can conveniently forget about this task.

      The only time I like to keep a todo list is when I'm swamped, customers are complaining of the backlog, and I need some way of demonstrating and documenting the workload. In this case, help desk systems become the todo lists.

  34. One I programmed myself by Xeroc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually use an organizer / to-do list that I programmed myself in PHP and Javascript (actually using AJAX!), so that I can access it and modify it anywhere in the world! (As it resides on a web server on my computer)

    --
    "Real programmers don't comment their code. If it was hard to write it should be hard to understand."
    1. Re:One I programmed myself by Bungopolis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That sounds nice -- have you released it to the world? If not, please do.

    2. Re:One I programmed myself by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      I've been so frustrated with the lack of something that meets my needs (do I really need to run a whole fucking MySQL server just to store my own info?) that I've started working on my own PIM app, except with Python and a bit of Javascript. It's getting a little overly ambitious though, since I'd like to have both an HTML and a wxPython interface.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    3. Re:One I programmed myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of such things on sourceforge, just search for calendar.

      Plus, it's so easy to do that I did code my own as well (ASP.Net instead). I just didn't feel like having to spend more time trying to customize somebody else's code (and be forced to go with whatever language they chose - and chances are they use some features that tie it to some DB you don't want). Ajax here too, exports to CSV and XML, has a couple web services, lots of neat little extras.

      Yes, I'm considering releasing it on sourceforge, along with a truly outstanding knowledgebase web app (it's really great). I'm not sure how much people whould use it though, most of the stuff on sourceforge seems to be php/mysql...

    4. Re:One I programmed myself by HermanAB · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maorong Zou's Webcal: http://www.math.utexas.edu/users/mzou/webCal/index .html There are at least 3 programs going by the name of Webcal, but this one actually works...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    5. Re:One I programmed myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tada list

      Fancy AJAX and all. Have fun.

    6. Re:One I programmed myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot to say...

      It uses the FCKEditor for entering new data. It has import features (CSV/XML). Soon to have optional local weather info (unobtrusive) and other custom info (from web services and rss/atom feeds)

      Perhaps one day I'll add some MAPI code to suck data out of outlook/exchange (new appts and "you have x new emails").

      But before that I've got a really great knowledgebase app I'm considering "opening". I don't know if there really are people using things we post on SF or if they just get lost somewhere deep (unless you got 99.9% activity).

      You say "you should open source it", but I doubt much people would use them (even if they're very good).

    7. Re:One I programmed myself by CHR1S · · Score: 1

      I use a php based web cal available on sourceforge. It's great for managing a simple cal but I'm not sure how advanced you want it to get. It's worth a look though: http://webcalendar.sourceforge.net/.

    8. Re:One I programmed myself by barrettlight50 · · Score: 1

      Tasktoy is another, very simple, web based to do list.

    9. Re:One I programmed myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not the OP, but the problem with open-sourcing apps like these is that they are often not written with release in mind. How many times have you just sat down and thrown together a quick kludge that you would be embarassed to show the rest of the world? I know I have, many times.

    10. Re:One I programmed myself by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      My problem usually is not that it is too much of a ludge, but more that it depends on too many other things that I run locally to release it.

    11. Re:One I programmed myself by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      It is great.
      After reading about AJAX again yesterday, I thought about what would be possible with this calender using such techniques...
      Maybe Maorong is interested?
      (I have been doing work on this calendar in the early days, but for the past year or to it has just been running and I have not done much...)

    12. Re:One I programmed myself by karthik_r085 · · Score: 1

      I use SmartCal. It is pretty good. Calendar + Contacts + Tasks + Notes + Links + Search + Add to Webpage + ... More about features: http://www.smartcal.com/ProductFeatures.html

    13. Re:One I programmed myself by markdavis · · Score: 1

      We have been using webcalendar (webcal) from Zou for several years now. It is wonderful.

      1) Easy to use
      2) Nice interface
      3) Very stable, have yet to have a data problem
      4) Very portable and compatible

      Sure, there are things missing I wish it had, like syncing to Palm Pilots, but it is really great. And it is free.

    14. Re:One I programmed myself by SlashDotDashDot · · Score: 1

      I did the same for my Todo list. It's an installable application to the Web Application Gateway (http://sourceforge.net/projects/wagateway/ (GPL).

      --
      "A child of 5 could do this! Fetch me a child of 5!"
  35. Kontact by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 2, Informative

    The answer for me is easy: kontact. I use all the components, including KMail. It syncs the Calendar, TODO list, etc., perfectly with my PDA (a Sony Clie).

  36. Evolution + iPod by chesapeake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use evolution to do my calendaring and to-do lists. It's really quite good. I also prefer it as a mail client to thunderbird, which kinda irritates me for some reason (I still use thunderbird for reading usenet though).

    But this isn't much use if you can't read your calendar when you need to, so I use some of the scripts from gtkPod to sync my calendar, contacts and todo with my iPod. It works quite well, and since I carry the iPod around fairly often I can always get to the information.

    I have vague memories of gnome's time/date widget thingy also showing me my appointments for each day, but it doesn't seem to do that anymore - I think after I upgraded evolution. (I'm running debian unstable).

    1. Re:Evolution + iPod by krasmussen · · Score: 1

      And with gpilot installed, it will rock your palm, too!

  37. Evolution by JanneM · · Score: 1

    I just use the Evolution calendar. Simple to use, and right there on my desktop at all times.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:Evolution by xNstAble · · Score: 1

      Evolution is a great application for calendars and email. I don't like the way tasks are handled, I'm looking for a better solution for this. Anyway I really don't understand way evolution is so poorly rated in this discussion at all...

    2. Re:Evolution by saskboy · · Score: 1

      As soon as Evolution is ported to Windows, I'll be all over it. Until then I have to stay with my buggy and slow Mozilla Sunbird pre-release, which churns to a standstill whenever I maximize it, and doesn't have the smooth Outlook entry interface I'm used to at work.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  38. Scheduling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    For scheduling? Why cron, of course...

    1. Re:Scheduling? by axxackall · · Score: 1

      Why "funny"? I do use cron for the most important recurrent task reminders (atd for occasional ones) when they are closely related to the system administration. In that case the task reminder can be forwarded to email, jabber or whater being configured so. But what's more important, the reminder script can pickup something from the system to keep me in a real context.
      On a contrary, when I communicate with others I prefer either Outlook or Evolution or iCal as I need it to be be integrated with email as the main way of such communication.
      Too bad that not only GUI based schedulers are not well integrated with each other, but they are poorly integrated with cron and atd. Except Evolution, which has more ways of such integration being open-sourced.

      --

      Less is more !
    2. Re:Scheduling? by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      HotGurl69: whats your sched 4 2nite?
      l1nuxl33t87: 15 19 * * 1-5 "read /."
      HotGurl69: wtf?
      l1nuxl33t87: 30 20 * * 4 "dinner?"

      No thanks. :-)

  39. Palm M500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can pick up an old Palm Vx or M500 for $35 on ebay. They're extremely portable, and the battery lasts a month.

  40. Evolution 2.2 by bgarrett · · Score: 1

    It rocks my world. AIM and Yahoo screen names feed right into GAIM 1.3, my GNOME taskbar calendar shows my appointments right then and there, and it runs fast (at least for me).

    --
    Nothing worth doing is worth doing today.
  41. Geeks, organized? by dspisak · · Score: 1

    I guess you didn't get the memo.

    However, I use iCal on OS X for all my calendar needs.

    1. Re:Geeks, organized? by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think he got the memo, but he forgot to read it before he lost it.

      And of course, the best way to schedule things is to work out the dependency rules, and then just run make on it. If you have someone to help you with your todo list, then make -j2.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  42. PDA, actually by mkswap-notwar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, I still use my PDA. It's very flexible, not tied to whatever OS I'm booted into at the moment, and does everything you inquired about.

    And, if it doesn't do something that I need, I'll write something that does.

    --
    "I reject your reality, and substitute my own!"
  43. Mozilla Calendar and Lightning by helix400 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Sunbird is currently undergoing a complete rewrite. I've worked with early builds of the new Sunbird, and it's looking pretty nice. Eventually, it should emerge with a much better framework to handle many Calendar and scheduling needs.

    Mozilla Lightning is also doing well in development. You can see some screenshots of it here (may load slowly): http://diary.e-gandalf.net/?p=35.

    It seems like these developers finally understand the great need for Calendar products. I frequently hear discussion of the most wanted features, such as different calendar formats, integration with other handhelds, etc.

  44. a wiki by porter235 · · Score: 1

    I use moinmoin http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/> with the MonthCalendar macro http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/MonthCalendar>

  45. NOTHING! by Sparr0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How about "Nothing"? I can count on one hand the number of things I need to accomplish and places I need to go, other than my commute on work days, during the next 8 weeks. Stop living such complicated lives. You do not need to schedule a trip to the grocery store. When the thing you want isnt in the cupboard, go shopping.

    1. Re:NOTHING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually the poster makes a valid point. Do you run your life or does your calander?

    2. Re:NOTHING! by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>How about "Nothing"? I can count on one hand the number of things I need to accomplish and places I need to go, other than my commute on work days, during the next 8 weeks. Stop living such complicated lives.

      Not to sound harsh, but based upon your comments I get the sense that you probably haven't managed a project or otherwise been responsible for the work of others.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    3. Re:NOTHING! by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Rock on. I'm a very spur-of-the-moment type of person. I know where I need to be and when by memory, and I rarely forget. What I don't get are people who stay constantly busy. Why not just sit down and take a break for a while, vegetate on the couch, read a good book, chill out, SLACK OFF??!

    4. Re:NOTHING! by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Not to sound obvious, but you could make that assumption about anyone and be right more than half the time. For there to be managers there have to be subordinates, and the latter is the majority.

      It just so happens I have been responsible for the work of others. I did not enjoy it and, given the choice, will probably not do it again.

    5. Re:NOTHING! by vettemph · · Score: 1

      Not to sound on topic, but the original article asked about to-do lists and appointments, Not Work Breakdown Structures and Project planning. Understanding the scope is key.

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  46. Nothing free for Windows? by NineNine · · Score: 1

    I've been lookin' *forever* for a free (OSS is fine) calendar for Windows, but I can't find nothin' that comes close to Outlook. I've been watching Sunbird, but it's going *very* slow, and they're still in the fix-the-major-bugs-so-it-doesn't-lose-data stage, so adding features will (hopefully) come much later.

    1. Re:Nothing free for Windows? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'd much rather have pornographers in the world than fundies like you.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:Nothing free for Windows? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Evolution is great on Linux and Novel is working on a Windows port. It works better with Outlook than Outlook works with Outlook...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    3. Re:Nothing free for Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A) You've been trolled. Please, the parent didn't even cite a Bible verse at you, and you're labelling the parent a fundie?

      B) I note the intolerance in your answer. Are you modeling that for others to mimic? Is that level of intolerance how you wish to be treated?

    4. Re:Nothing free for Windows? by leecn · · Score: 1

      I just read a bunch of your posts, you seem pretty ignorant.

  47. ical & palm & isync & webdav by bzImage8 · · Score: 1
    The WebDav features of iCal allows me to subscribe to my pals calendars, palm for on the go scheduling and isync to keep everything the same..

    Simple..

    --
    Unix its simple, but sometimes it takes a geniuos to understand the simplicity -- Dennis Ritchie
  48. Yahoo by melcrose · · Score: 0

    Yahoo has an EXCELLENT calendar, w/ to do list and notes. It synchs to your PDA using free software from yahoo (and the default datebook on a palm pda). I never actually look at the thing online, but if my pda ever dies, it will re-synch to the net and I'm good to go.

  49. Post-it Notes! by Gorffy · · Score: 1

    Post-it notes. A lot of them. I even have an orginisation sceme for them. Ones on the monitor are Ugrent. Second monitor are daily, the window beside me (also covered in post-its) are reminders (hours for work, to do sometime in the next week) garbage can under the desk is the "out" tray. If I need to look back I dig through the can. Holds 3 months worth of notes.

  50. As a mainly Mac user... by jht · · Score: 1

    I use iCal, simply because of the iSync support and the ability to publish calendars easily (I have some third parties who schedule me on occasion for their clients, and it's easier to avoid being inadvertently double-booked if I publish my schedule for them to check). I sync between three different Macs (home, office, and PowerBook), my cellphone, and my PocketPC.

    I like MS Entourage a lot better than iCal, and if it had direct support for iSync I'd probably use it instead. Supposedly an update this summer will enable that feature on Tiger. Besides that, I was an avid user of Outlook 2000 at my prior company, and I've set up plenty of Windows clients on Outlook 2003 (with an Exchange Server and a good antivirus/antispam front-end, it's a nice workgroup product). If my business were more Windows-focused, I'd use Outlook 2003 without hesitation. And as nice as Entourage's Project feature is, overall Outook makes Entourage its beeyotch - provided you can get past the Windows thing.

    Also on the Mac side, I've used both Now and Daylite - Now is OK but not really my cup of tea, and Daylite is nice in a workgroup plus it adds some CRM function. Both are better than iCal for multiple users.

    I think ultimately Sunbird needs to be incorporated into Thunderbird in order to give Outlook a serious run. Calendaring and e-mail just have so many logical ties to one another that it's a good place for a monolithic app. As slick as the Mac built-in apps (Mail, Address Book, iCal) are, they just don't offer that nice level of integration you get out of Entourage or Outlook.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  51. Ecco by rmcd · · Score: 1
    Ecco, available from Netmanage. This was an awesome piece of software 7 years ago when it was orphaned, and it is still an extremely capable calendar/phonebook/outliner. It does peer-to-peer synchronization (it automatically syncs across my two desktops and laptop, for example) and can sync with palms. You can link items flexibly using categories.

    If you don't need workgroup calendars (although Ecco does those too) and if you run Windows, it's great software. And the price is right.

  52. Re:Outlook, for understanding words as well as dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I submitted this as a "feature request" for Evolution in 2001 or so. Still not a feature...

  53. Are you really serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we really evaluating version 0.2 of a product now? I think it's a WEEEEEE bit early for this discussion.

  54. MOD UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Using a computer for a "to-do" list or calendar is just using technology for the sake of using technology. Pen and paper works fine. It has the advantage of being more portable than the smallest PDA as well.

    1. Re:MOD UP! by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      I disagree. A piece of paper in my pocket doesn't sound an alarm when I need to get to a meeting. My cellular with a built in organizer, on the other hand, does do that. That one little feature makes my life a WHOLE lot easier.

    2. Re:MOD UP! by jondt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Using a computer for a "to-do" list or calendar is just using technology for the sake of using technology.
      On the contrary, I think it is one of the best uses of technology.

      Pen and paper works fine. It has the advantage of being more portable than the smallest PDA as well.
      Lets see.
      • I can sync entries between any computer in the world, including my phone (which is actually smaller than any diary I've ever seen - and is always in my pocket anyway).
      • I can create backups at a click of my mouse.
      • I can publish selected parts of it so that others can shedule around my life.
      • I can include hyperlinks and documents within my entries for easy retrieval nearer the time.

      Elaborate please, why is this technology for the sake of using technology?
    3. Re:MOD UP! by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Using a computer for a "to-do" list or calendar is just using technology for the sake of using technology."

      Generalizations always suck.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:MOD UP! by thparker · · Score: 1
      Using a computer for a "to-do" list or calendar is just using technology for the sake of using technology. Pen and paper works fine. It has the advantage of being more portable than the smallest PDA as well.

      This is just nonsense. Maybe it's "more portable than the smallest PDA" if you're scribbling your schedule on the back of a napkin. But if you have a job and a genuinely complicated schedule, where you might actually need to go back and review what you did and when, then you're carrying around some kind of organizer like a Day-Timer. My old one 8 x 5.5 and over an inch thick.

      My buddy still carries one because he says it's more "convenient." Every day he has to carry forward the To Do items that are still outstanding to the next page. A change to an appointment involves lots of erasing and rewriting. And if the appointment is further out than the 3 months that fit (under the 2-page-per-day format), then they go into a summary calendar that gets recopied when the correct month rolls around.

    5. Re:MOD UP! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "My buddy still carries one because he says it's more "convenient." Every day he has to carry forward the To Do items that are still outstanding to the next page. A change to an appointment involves lots of erasing and rewriting. And if the appointment is further out than the 3 months that fit (under the 2-page-per-day format), then they go into a summary calendar that gets recopied when the correct month rolls around."

      Hehe. Wanna have fun? Ask your friend how he sets up a re-occuring task.

      As for me: I like Outlook's To do list. I use it for taking notes. I use it for reminding me to do stuff. I like that you can attach files with it. Heck, you can even copy/paste spreadsheets into it. That's pretty slick.

      I also used to have a setup where if I set a to-do item to the right category, it'd automatically upload the task to my phone via bluetooth. That way my phone's alarm would go off. (Since I don't have a PDA and my phone goes EVERYWHERE with me...) And, if I enter a task into my phone, it'll eventually show up on my computer. So... if something hits me and I'm not near a computer...

      I loathe the thought of carrying around an organizer when my cell phone's around me all the time. Can't wait to replace it with a PocketPC.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:MOD UP! by bernywork · · Score: 1

      I use the guy I report to and a project manager to whinge at me when my brain doesn't keep up with what's going on.

      If I don't remember a few things in a row, then they usually start thinking "He forgot, probably has too much on his plate, can I get someone else to handle this, or is this a Berny only thing?" If they can pass it off they do.

      Better than ANY computer, something that can make a decision!

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    7. Re:MOD UP! by midnighttoadstool · · Score: 1
      "Using a computer for a "to-do" list or calendar is just using technology for the sake of using technology."

      Generalizations always suck.

      Yeah! You should be using the calendar and to do list on a mobile phone.

  55. Time & Chaos 6 by GK_2002 · · Score: 1

    I myself use Time & Chaos 6 from http://www.chaossoftware.com/ It sync's with my ancient but still servicable Palm IIIxe. I particularly like how you can customize fields for contacts, track to-do's as done for a history. I also use the Activity Series to create standard sets of events when I initiate a sales contact and for tracking customer statisfaction. I would like to see this use a better websync ability other than their proprietary usage but this is a good solution for me and my consulting business. I like the billing addon which helps me track hours on specific projects for billing as well.

    Given the price this is effective and reasonable software. I will admit it's not perfect and I would love to have events that stretched over multiple days rather than having to copy an event over the period of days, but that's really a minor consideration. In a small workgroup this works quite well for my office (there are 4 of us) co-ordinating meetings and checking each other's schedules.

    Give it a try, you may find this works better for you. It's not free software, but it is quality shareware by a good company.

  56. PHP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any PHP project out there? It would be nice to have a web based interface that can support a small company.

    1. Re:PHP? by cknudsen · · Score: 1

      WebCalendar, of course!
      http://webcalendar.sourceforge.net/

      --
      http://www.k5n.us
  57. Small and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a calendar, but for a quick little Todo list, I just use GTodo (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtodo/ for lack of a real home page). It's nothing fancy, just a list of items with a few fields and sorting by the various fields.

  58. WIsh list: day marking by British · · Score: 1

    I wish you could mark a whole day on a calendar, but not tie it to a specifc task that needs to be checked off

    For example:

    Recycling day. Mark the day before the actual day to remind you to take it out to the curb. But if you miss it, no big deal.

    Pay day. Direct deposit, whoopee.

    1. Re:WIsh list: day marking by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 1

      korganizer allows this. (if you run one of the unixes) I used it the other day for my birthday. =)

    2. Re:WIsh list: day marking by Hooptie · · Score: 1

      You had to use your calendar program to tell you when your birthday was?

      Hooptie

      --
      "Heavens, it appears that my weewee has been stricken with rigor mortis!" -- Stewie Griffin
  59. iCal + iPod + iSync = trifecta by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure a lot of other people will or have said it,
    but iCal synched with iPod is bliss.

    Additionally, you can post your iCal schedule online and share it with .mac

    1. Re:iCal + iPod + iSync = trifecta by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the only problem is that you can't enter events on the iPod, and using iSync with a Palm instead sucks.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:iCal + iPod + iSync = trifecta by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the only problem is that you can't enter events on the iPod, and using iSync with a Palm instead sucks.

      Why? I use it with my Treo 650 and it works just fine. The only trouble I've had is I haven't yet figured out how to get my calendar categories onto the Palm, but other than that, a quick bluetooth sync does everything I need.

      So what problems do it cause for you?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:iCal + iPod + iSync = trifecta by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You already said it: it doesn't sync categories -- not with the calender, not with the to-do list, and not with the address book. This IS the big problem, and the reason it sucks. Categories are important to me! Also, it doesn't sync locations either.

      So yeah, that's why it sucks: what good is a sync when you have to go back and manually fix the categories and locations anyway?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:iCal + iPod + iSync = trifecta by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess it's a matter of usage patterns. I sync almost always from Mac to Palm. I create a Palm calendar event maybe once a week. That goes straight into a Palm category, done up in an ugly color in iCal, so I notice it and switch it. For me that's well worth the other benefits.

      if you had to do this several times a day it wouldn't be worth it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  60. What do I use? Pens and a whiteboard... by NeoThermic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Being dyslexic and dyspraxic (it has its perks once and a while), I can't write well on paper. Infact, my fine motor control is so bad that it looks like a spider has died, rather than my todo list.

    So to organise anything, I use a whiteboard with pens. Why? Its better than any digital application as it works without power, doesn't require me to sit down to use it, and most importantly, it requires gross motor control, something that I still have.

    When you're able to write your todo list in 10cm letters at any time, able to check it off in many ways, and even the ability to doddle when bored, you'll see that there isn't a single application that can ever come close to a whiteboard.

    NeoThermic

    --
    Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    1. Re:What do I use? Pens and a whiteboard... by ag-gvts-inc · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm normally not uptight about spelling, but since I made the same mistake you just did in a spelling bee over 15 years ago I'll just let you know that I think you mean: "dawdle."

    2. Re:What do I use? Pens and a whiteboard... by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      From the context, I think he meant "doodle".

      P.S. I loved the dead spider comparison :-)

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    3. Re:What do I use? Pens and a whiteboard... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      "dawdle" means to delay; "doodle" means to draw little squiggly pictures.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:What do I use? Pens and a whiteboard... by ag-gvts-inc · · Score: 1

      You guys are probably right. For some reason, the word 'doodle' never occurred to me.

  61. pscal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use pscal to create calendars that I print out and tape to my wall. I write things on them. Ta da! Free and easy.

  62. phpcalendar by rtt · · Score: 1

    I tried using iCal but it didn't quite offer me what I wanted.

    I ended up using php-calendar (demo) set up on some webspace. It's very simple, but it does the job for me.

    I can't help but feel that Google must be working on a calendar system akin to Gmail.

  63. calendar.google.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there should be one. They give us everything else including the kitchen sink, so why not a free calendar program that keeps all your appointments from the past 10 years, automatically cross-references them to your emails and gives you driving directions when applicable. I can't believe Google doesn't have this yet!

  64. Need a server first by teneighty · · Score: 1

    Having a calendar client is all fine and good, but until open source calendar servers are as ubiquitious as Apache, a calender client isn't going to be a lot of use.

    An especially promising initiave in this are is the Hula project.

    1. Re:Need a server first by ashridah · · Score: 1

      You realise, of course, one can use apache+webdav to act as an adhoc (sort of), calendar server, within a smaller organisation, at least.

      Personally, I'm extremely happy with Evolution 2.2, so far as scheduling has been concerned. worked well with my palm pilot (an ancient m100) back in the day when that dear thing still lived (it consumes batteries far too quickly and doesn't self charge, so i eventually discarded it)

      I'll be interested if/when novell follow through on their 'lets port evolution to win32' idea. That would be a great move, imho, since i already use imap for mail, i could easily move to using webdav or ldap or something for contacts and calendaring to go with it, no matter what i'm using at the time.

      ashridah

    2. Re:Need a server first by AussiePenguin · · Score: 1

      The problem with using apache+webdav is that you can't really query a given time to see if anything else is scheduled. In fact, looking at iCal, I think it only appears that you can publish a calendar or subscribe read-only. You can't retrieve a calendar and make changes then republish.

      --

      Jeremy
      Melbourne, Australia
      Jabber Australia

    3. Re:Need a server first by AussiePenguin · · Score: 1

      Looks interesting. I wonder if it'll integrate with Jabber.

      --

      Jeremy
      Melbourne, Australia
      Jabber Australia

  65. iCal under MacOS X! by Archeopteryx · · Score: 1

    I love it.

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
    1. Re:iCal under MacOS X! by fatwreckfan · · Score: 1

      Plus it works well for subscribing to calendars published by Sunbird. The only thing I wish I could do was have write access to the shared calendars from both applications.

  66. Good Question by bazooka_foo · · Score: 1

    I am currently trying to get off the ms outlook.

    It is hard.

    I have replaced it w/ thunderbird and sunbird. Both are leaving me wanting though.

    What i miss most are the contacts from outlook. I have my phone line plugged into my modem and would use outlook to dial phone numbers - it worked great expecially when i had to dial long-distance numbers. I wish thunderbird had this feature.

    Sunbird seems to be meeting my needs mostly. i use the calendaring prog to keep track of client billing hours mostly.

    for the todo - most of my todo comes in the form of emails sent to me. so i just right click and mark the as important. In outlook this was cleaner than it is in thunderbird.

    I still find myself opening outlook to find emails or use the contacts.

  67. I can't see the poll question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... because of all the post-its on my monitor

  68. Calendar on Mac--Entourage and a Blackberry by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

    I used Outlook XP with my BlackBerry 7100t until my desktop machine died at the hands of...well, me. It's replacement is a Mac Mini, and I use Office 2004 for Mac. Using PocketMac for Blackberry, I am all nice and synced. In fact, it was the syncing that made it easy to import my Windows Outlook XP contacts and appointments over to the Mac.

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  69. Now we know your lying.... by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    I also use software that allows me to share contacts and calendar information with my {punchline} GF {/punchline}

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    1. Re:Now we know your lying.... by Zero+Sum · · Score: 2, Funny

      I prefer to conact my GF with hardware not software.

      --

      Zero Sum (don't amount to much). [root@localhost]

    2. Re:Now we know your lying.... by cob666 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Lying about using Outlook

      ..or about having a girlfriend

      HAHA - I knew I was going to take some heat for that one!

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
  70. Is this important? by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 0, Troll

    really, is it?

    --
    What keeps me going is my inertia.
    1. Re:Is this important? by macz · · Score: 1
      This is critical. It is the one thing that Microsoft does really really well and it is astounding that there isn't a similar killer app in the OSS world.

      It is no accident that the first post was unequivocally "Outlook 2003." with several, non derogatory follow ups agreeing.

      You can make an effective argument that MS is evil... but you gotta admit they got the skills when it comes to really good email/calendar integration.

      Lets face it: E-mail is the workflow product of choice, combined with an integrated calendar, it increases it's effectiveness as a business tool by an order of magnitude. That OSS doesn't even come close, and that people are, gasp, willing to pay for this superior MS tool, means that they are also much more likely to be tied to MS platforms like Office and Windows as well.

      Make something OSS better than Outlook that is Exchange Server compatible, and you will make a serious dent in an important MS supply line.

      --
      ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
    2. Re:Is this important? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      My motivation for using Thunderbird has nothing to do with MS' supply line; I just prefer a simple but effective mail client. I switched away from Outlook a couple of years ago, after a string of screw-ups led to trying (and failing) to restore my old mail from a back-up, combined with basic features like mail filtering never working properly.

      Now, I may have to switch back; after my employer was taken over by a larger group that uses Exchange routinely, they've switched basic things like meeting planning and booking rooms to a system that Outlook can access, but Thunderbird can't. Without something like Sunbird getting up to speed to fill these critical non-email functions that Outlook supports, I won't be able to use Thunderbird for e-mail any more. :-(

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:Is this important? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      This may be an itch/scratch problem. Developers have idiosyncratic calendaring/time management needs from everyone else. Unless they are managing a development project (particularly across groups) they just don't get what other types of users might need, or how their lives are structured. Particularly those of us who work in a numer of different "modes" over the day.

      I'm interested to see how Chandler works out--Mitch Kapor's a bright guy.

  71. Oracle Calendar aka. Corporate time by codegen · · Score: 1

    I used to use Palm Desktop on my Mac linking to my Palm PDA. However, our university went to a central scheduling system called Corporate time. It allows people to book appointments on other peoples calendars and to book rooms and equipment. It can sync with the Palm PDA. However the interface is not the greatest and is somewhat clunky.

    --
    Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  72. KOrganizer (from kdepim) by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

    Very simple but easy to use interface, which is fine for me.

  73. Gregorian by macz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have tried them all, Julian, Aztech... you name it. But I find that Gregorian does the job with minimal fuss and a high degree of accuracy (but not so much accuracy that it is cold and unfriendly.)

    --
    ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
    1. Re:Gregorian by julesh · · Score: 1

      Don't you find figuring out all those complex leap year rules tricky?

      Although I guess after the aztec calendar, everything will seem simple.

  74. I use my cell phone... by Skudd · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Hello? Mom? Yeah... Do I have anything going on tomorrow at 3:00PM? What time do the guys need to have the first stage of CMS development done? Okay... Thanks for trying... Love you too. Bye."

  75. Horde Kronolith by egburr · · Score: 4, Informative

    www.horde.org See the kronolith project It's what I use for web-based email, calendar, address book, and more on my home server, and is available anywhere I have access to a web browser.

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Horde Kronolith by OldeClegg · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm ignorant. Why is this modded Funny?

  76. emacs and planer.el! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its great! It does everything, includes a timeclock for my projects, wiki note taking.. and no rodent fondling required.. its all keystrokes.

  77. Palm Desktop by vmalloc_ · · Score: 1

    Palm Desktop is a great, relatively bloat-free program for managing this stuff. Mind you, I don't actually have a palm pilot (though might get one in the future). The program is FREE on Palm's web site, and unlike Outlook, it has better compatibility with third party software (like, say, a different e-mail client). It's also a bit more simple and intuitive. Give it a shot.

    1. Re:Palm desktop by argent · · Score: 1

      I'm using Palm Desktop too. I tried switching to iSync and iCal, and I tried using Outlook and a Pocket PC, but I ended up with duplicated entries when I synced my Palm at work and at home... only Palm Desktop really handles syncing multiple places and multiple devices at all well... and it's really not all that good.

      What's needed is a calendar that separates the repository from its own calendar, so it syncs changes from all sources equally, intelligently, tagging every bit of information with where it came from and what it was sent to and how it was tagged whether or not its own database is organised the same way... and treating its own displayed data as just one of many sources for information in the repository.

  78. The one final and best solution by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    sticky notes

    1. Re:The one final and best solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are like me, searching for simplicity, then may I suggest Rainlendar http://vapaa.dc.inet.fi/~rainy/index.php.

      Yes, yes, it doesn't have 1% of those omg leet calendar applications, but it is really, really simple so you don't caught up in bloat :)

      But it does beat all those calnedar apps when it comes to looks, however.

    2. Re:The one final and best solution by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

      That is a good app.
      Why be anon about this?

  79. Sunbird & iCal by epall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a small network with a few users and we use a combination of iCal and Sunbird. We have an apache web server with a WebDAV repository to store the calendars, so we can all look at them. All three compuers can see all four calendars (there's an extra "common" calendar) and changes are automatically propagated between machines. iCal even syncs one of the calendars to my Treo 650. Yes, Sunbird can be a little hard to work with and a little buggy at times, but it mostly does the job. And we don't need any kind of expensive Exchange server software.

    1. Re:Sunbird & iCal by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      I like Sunbird too, even though it won't start on my OS X box anymore...

      iCal never made it past the configuration dialog -- I typed in the https URL to my WebDAV share and it said "we doan do no steenken SSL" and I said thanks for playing.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
  80. Event Sherpa is a bit like iCal for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Oooh, they seem to de going through some "restructuring". You can still download Sherpa here IIRC it can read/write .ics files

  81. Killer Calendar? by Tavor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Want me to make you a calendar, complete with whirling blades of death. It shall be booth shaped, and have two killing speeds.

    --
    Windows has detected an undetectable error.
  82. Re:For OS X: Entourage 2004 by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't like having to keep 3 apps open at the same time.

    Out of interest why?

    One of the things I hated when I had to use Windows (in business) was that unlike the OS I loved (RISC OS which doesn't have the concept of the MDI and everything is opened in its own window) it had big monolithic apps rather than lots of little ones that worked together.

    One of the things I like about OS-X (and the earlier MacOSes) is that they have relatively small apps that do work together.

    Isn't the point of the GUI to be able to have several apps open at the same time? So as I've said above out of interest why do you prefer one monolithic app?

  83. Easy by Approaching.sanity · · Score: 1

    The Hipster PDA.

    Seriously. Look into it.

    --
    RTFA again for the best results.
  84. For years I didn't think I needed a calendar... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    ... until I finally started using one.

    As trite as it sounds, iCal is great because it Just Works. I sync it to my cell phone, which basically fills the role of my old PDA - reminder alarm works, and my schedule is right there. I don't generally need to enter new events "on the go" so using the phone's interface on those rare occasions isn't a problem.

    The iCal / Address Book / iSync combo is very sweet, with just about no overhead required in terms of effort on my part. Compare that to the "emacs calendar" post a bit higher, which I seriously hope was written with tongue in cheek...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  85. Re:For OS X: Entourage 2004 by Necroman · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems like most major universities have some kind of deal with Microsoft to let students buy Office for cheap. Most of the time you can check with your schools IT department to see if your school is part of the program. And sometimes the school isn't part of the program, but individual colleges within the university are enrolled in the program. (The Computer Science dept I went through had the Microsoft agreement before the entire school did).

    And for people that graduated from College and are in the real world (and the people that didn't go to college), some larger companies have a deal with Microsoft to let you get MS Office for cheap. You'll again have to talk with your IT department or whoever, to see if your company is enrolled in the "Home Use Program". https://hup.microsoft.com/

    I just ordered Office 2004 from the Home Use Program... and it is showing as "Backordered" on my order status now. >

    --
    Its not what it is, its something else.
  86. canary pad by baomike · · Score: 1

    Nothing like a canary pad to write down what you gotta do.

    Didn't even know firefox came with a calendar.
    Always used the one on the wall or cal.

  87. To do list by pyro17 · · Score: 1

    Two words, pencil and paper.

  88. I like Outlook. by rhasselbaum · · Score: 1

    I like Outlook. Please don't hurt me.

  89. Nokia 6230 and Microsoft Outlook by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1

    The very convenient combination of Microsoft Outlook 2003, a Nokia 6230 and Bluetooth. The phone and outlook automatically sync whenever I get within 20 metres of either my home or work computer, keeping both PC's and the phone in sync at all times.

  90. gTodo by cappaberra · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you use gnome and haven't tried gTodo yet, you're missing out on the simplest/cleanest todo list program ever written... check it out!

  91. TI-89 Titanium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For all of us students, integration with the TI-89 Titanium would be truly awesome. The built-in calendar software is pretty cool (basic, but it gets the job done), but trying to type on the keypad is damned near impossible. The calculator comes standard with a USB port; it's almost a PDA.

    1. Re:TI-89 Titanium by tonymeadows · · Score: 1

      There is an open-source driver you can run as an application to use a PS/2 keyboard rewired to a graphlink connector... unfortunately I can't find the link. But I built an adapter a few years ago for my TI-83, basically you run the TX and RX lines through. Not sure if this is a viable option but I found a link to a pre-built device: http://www.calc.org/webstore/ You might want to try modding one of those fold-up Palm keyboards, it'd be an interesting hack and still portable enough to use. I used to take notes on my TI-83.

  92. Try and try and try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For appointments, to-do lists, scheduling, etc. I have tried:

    1. Dayplanners-- useful for a few days and then I forget it somewhere and then its not so useful.

    2. PDA-- small and stylish (at the time), but too slow to input anything.

    3. Software-- great when you're at home, but locked into the computer which makes it not so portable.

    Finally I wound up relying on my brain to keep track of everything. It's portable, doesn't take up much space, somewhat stylish (if you're into that kinda thing), never runs out of memory, input is quick, output is quick unless hampered by beer or boobs.

  93. Samsung i500 phone, its associated Windows app by puzzled · · Score: 1


    I got a Samsung i500 phone a few weeks back and its my first PDA. It has Palm OS, internet via Sprint's network, and if I could find an ssh client that didn't blow up constantly the machine would be perfect.

    There is a light, fast Windows app called Palm Desktop that came with it. This rocks - runs, its quick, doesn't crash, has nice features.

    I tried Kpilot and it just doesn't grok i500 yet. I tried Outlook (Outbreak) that came with Office 2000 and it is teh sux0r - what a bloated hog of an application - feels like 1/4th the speed of the Palm Desktop app.

    In an ideal world that Evolution Exchange connector thingy I just started playing with will support the i500 and I'll again be free of M$'s evil Fatware, till then its a Thinkpad T22 with burned out video hooked up to my KVM running Win2k with no internet connection for the backup side of my PDA.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    1. Re:Samsung i500 phone, its associated Windows app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please be fair, yes Outlook 2000 did suck, Outlook XP fixed almost everything that was wrong with it, and now Outlook 2003 is just incredible. Unless you have tried Outlook 2003 please don't pass judgement.

  94. Kontact with egroupware by 55555 · · Score: 1

    I like Kontact, it has what I need and it's well designed. At any given point, however, I'm working from one of three computers. If I stored my calendars (or email) locally I'd have a problem.

    Solution? egroupware on my server and sync Kontact with that.

    I still don't have email quite figured out, currently I download it to each computer and then regularly clear off the POP3 account. My other problem is that and KMail doesn't seem to have a search-in-all-messages function.

    1. Re:Kontact with egroupware by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

      I still don't have email quite figured out...

      That's what an IMAP server + fetchmail is for.

    2. Re:Kontact with egroupware by Epsillon · · Score: 1

      NFS mount your /home. That way, your profiles and data follow you around.

      --
      Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
  95. Hooters Calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd recommend the Hooters Calendar, available at your local store by the same name. Each month features a new photorealistic "TO DO," though the probability that you'll ever get around to doing her is about as likely as a really solid Mozilla calendar.

  96. My Wife... by nessenj · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who needs a calendar when you have a wife?? She's great, she sends me reminders about 3 hours before an appointment starts and can schedule multiple appointments at a time... She has saved my ass more times than my Palm Pilot has.. When my wife is sick, or can't remember anything, I switch to Outlook...

    1. Re:My Wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She has also got a larger user base than Outlook....err... I am told.

    2. Re:My Wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I hear Wife 1.0 makes it really hard to upgrade Girlfriend to the latest version.

  97. Best solution by McBeer · · Score: 1

    Pen + Back of hand.

    seriously.

    --
    Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
  98. I must be the odd man out... by Ninwa · · Score: 1

    I don't use a calendar. Maybe this has to do with how young I am (17, going into my senior year of HS) but I've never found calendar applications useful. I use mozilla and gmail for my web/mail applications but there's just no need for a calendar. My calendar would consist of "Wake up at 3 PM, hack a little, eat, and repeat". :o)

    1. Re:I must be the odd man out... by Floody · · Score: 1

      I don't use a calendar. Maybe this has to do with how young I am (17, going into my senior year of HS) but I've never found calendar applications useful. I use mozilla and gmail for my web/mail applications but there's just no need for a calendar. My calendar would consist of "Wake up at 3 PM, hack a little, eat, and repeat". :o)

      You are not the odd man out. I am almost twice your age, and I do not use a calendar aside from occasionally typing `cal' at the $, just to see which weekdays certain dates fall on in the next few weeks.

      I have just as many meetings and priorities as the next shmoe (probably more than many). Fortunately, like all humans (ok, that's probably too generous .. let's say .. a significant portion of humans that read /.), I was born with a cpu capable of parallel-processing on a scale envied by the world's leading AI researchers.

      It doesn't do math very rapidly though as it is quaintly antiquated analog technology, but for calendaring: unbeatable.

  99. simple solution by jotux · · Score: 1

    sharpy + arm opposite to writing hand = simple semi-permanent to-do list.

  100. When by bcrowell · · Score: 1
    I suppose the parent got modded funny because Emacs is overkill for such a simple application?

    For those who want something really lean and mean, try my app, called When.

    1. Re:When by rsheridan6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To use Emacs just for a diary would be overkill, but some of us live in Emacs and it makes sense to do stuff in that environment. Once you're already running Emacs, the diary is just a 1500 line extension that comes with it.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    2. Re:When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No thanks.

  101. Google Notifier by Better+Than+Bacon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wish Google would extend Gmail and Gmail Notifier to include PDA stuff like TODO lists and a calender (with reminders). They could call the new client program "Google Notifier" since it would notify you about anything in your Google account, not just new e-mails.

    Gmail is great, so I bet Google could design an excellent web-based calendar program (could work on PDAs too, no HotSync necessary!)

    I already save a collection of Gmail Drafts that aren't "To" anyone, but have subjects like "Programming Ideas" and "Stuff To Remember". That way I can add stuff whether I'm at work, home, or school.

    1. Re:Google Notifier by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      I already save a collection of Gmail Drafts that aren't "To" anyone, but have subjects like "Programming Ideas" and "Stuff To Remember". That way I can add stuff whether I'm at work, home, or school.
      USB drive.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:Google Notifier by Better+Than+Bacon · · Score: 1

      You can't use them from unix clients.

      They are easy to lose.

  102. try the remind program. by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    Remind is a powerful open source program available on several platforms.

    --
    -- john
  103. Palm Desktop by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Don't laugh. It's still the best free calendar app out there.

    And it syncs with my old Sony Clie.

    Am I eagerly looking at each checkin for Mozilla Calendar? You bet I am. But until then, it's Palm Desktop.

  104. "maybe" editors are sleeping... by Jouser · · Score: 1

    I believe the "maybe" in the story should be "may be." I am a computer science major so I could be wrong.

    1. Re:"maybe" editors are sleeping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're correct. You may be a computer science major, but you appear to have paid attention in English class.

  105. Can you 'Dismiss' your wife though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outlook has that feature.

    1. Re:Can you 'Dismiss' your wife though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, Outlooks is pretty sexy.

  106. is there an IMAP for calenders and contacts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use evolution and recently started running cyrus-imap.. gota love imap!...
    But is there an standard protcol for "server stored" calaners / contacts ??
    What do people to to replace this functionality of M$Exchange ?
    is there a windows equiv. of evolution (not outlook) ?

  107. Evolution by Nailer · · Score: 1

    Obviously. Syncs to Palm, PocketPC and particular mobile phones (like my SonyEricsson) with MultiSync too. Supports standards like iCal. Available now for Linux, a Windows version is on the way. And the mail part is pretty good too - one of Outlook 2003's biggest features is vFolders, something Evo's had for about five years now.

  108. Evolution by asv108 · · Score: 1

    If you haven't used Evolution in a long time, its worth checking out. There have been significant improvements, especially since the 2.0 release. I've been using evolution for about four years now exclusively with great results. Calendaring is ical based, connects to exchange and others. The e-mail client and todo list is top notch too.

  109. jxProject works well... by uniqueUser · · Score: 0

    I too had this same question Friday. I was looking for something to keep up with multiple projects with a good gant chart interface. This works well for me but it does lack some advance features and interface objects. It is written in JAVA and is free!

    jxProject

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
  110. the old fashioned way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    once a year i buy one of those BIG desk calenders made of paper...

  111. Re:For OS X: Entourage 2004 by Necroman · · Score: 1

    Having one "Monolithic" application for email/calendar is rather nice to have. While I'm at work, I have a minimum of 5 programs running in my Taskbar at any given time while I'm programming. Having a single application to do Email/Calendar is nice at this point, because it is one less window I have to keep track of while coding.

    This is the same reason I use Firefox at work over IE. Tabbed browsing keeps down the number of windows I have opened at any given time (especially with the TabbedBrowing plugin).

    Also, my company is completely Office/Exchange based, and Outlook is really the only good program at communicating with an Exchange server. I know there are all those optional programs out there (like Evolution Connector and Groupcal for iCal). But nothing is as good as Outlook is. And getting my company to buy it for me is pretty hard to do since they already bought Office.

    --
    Its not what it is, its something else.
  112. Phone + text files by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 1

    Because I work on various computers in various parts of town, they don't make good organizing tools. A reminder in some organizing app on some computer will probably not reach me when it's due. On the other hand, I always have the phone on me. My age-old Nokia mobile phone has a reminder feature that I normally use for appointments and such.

    As for todo lists, I normally store my todo.txt in the project directory (normally a website's DocumentRoot). I've never seen an organizing tool do the job as quickly and efficiently as a good old text editor.

    Notable features of todo.txt:
    - Keep multiple TODO lists conveniently organized in a single file or keep them separated.
    - Quickly add, edit, remove and prioritize items on your lists.
    - Fits nicely with standard backup routines - no additional configuration required!
    - Zero learning curve! Just use your favorite text editor!

  113. Remind me please by Spacejock · · Score: 1

    Windows only, freeware, and I wrote it myself: RMP

  114. iCal is ok but...... by djdavetrouble · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah ical is ok, but actually I had serious problems when I wanted to print a fairly complicated itinerary. I ended up inputting the whole thing into palm desktop because I was in a crunch. I needed printouts that I could hand out to people. If I had more than a few things on a day, It would truncate text on the printout, rendering it useless and wack. So, great for scheduling your little activites, but for anything complicated (production schedule for example) its a no-go.

    ical is also not equipped for work groups, strictly a single user experience. At the office (1000+ workstations) we have been using groupwise for years and years and years. It is not without its ups and downs, but for email and calendar/scheduling it is a decent mule.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  115. Chandler by GraWil · · Score: 1

    I find chandler to meet my calendering needs. Sure, it's 1000x slower than the DOS program it is supposed replace (agenda) when running on a modern computer, but that python interface is sure sweet!

  116. WebCalendar by cknudsen · · Score: 1

    What? No one is using WebCalendar? ;-)

    It is open source and will work on Windows, MacOSX, Linux, etc. You just need PHP and a database (MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, etc.)

    You can now use Sunbird as your UI to manage your calendar, and your events will be stored in the WebCalendar server. (Just setup a remote subscription to WebCalendar from Sunbird.) You need the latest code in CVS to do this, but it's pretty cool. You can do this with other ical clients (like Apple iCal), too.

    http://webcalendar.sourceforge.net/

    The one area where WebCalendar is lacking is hotsync-ing with a PDA. However, that is on the to-do list, probably using SyncML.

    --
    http://www.k5n.us
  117. gCalandar by snikeris · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for google's calandar offering. Unfortuneatly, I'll have to keep missing appointments and deadlines in the meantime...

  118. It's on my Newton. Duh. by Posthumous+Arkansas · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does everyone here think the Newton is still the best PDA, PIM, whatever. . .

    (. . .crickets chirp. . .)

    Philistines.

  119. Life Balance by Lemuel · · Score: 1

    I use Life Balance for my todo list. It runs on both Windows and Palm OS for me and there is also a Mac version. I like it because it has a hierarchical structure so I can manage both single tasks as well as projects. Each task also has a place associated with it. This allows one to see all tasks that are relevant at home, at work, when running errands, etc. You can also set priorities at any level in the hierarchy to change the ordering of the tasks so it can help you determine what to do next.

  120. Post-It notes by ManifestDestiny · · Score: 1

    I use the Post-It program to write down all my to do things. It's actually one of the most useful programs out there... at least in my opinion

    1. Re:Post-It notes by wex · · Score: 1

      Yup. I switched from a different postit note program to the 3m one recently. The other program died on me after a couple months of note taking and I lost a ton of data. I'm thinking of setting up an automatic task to backup the 3m data file every day, just in case.

      I like that you can use crossed out text in PostIt. I have two main notes, one with things todo and another with important items that have been completed. The horizontal scrollbar is also surprisingly nice.

  121. post-its by Abstract_Me · · Score: 0

    post-its and mass amounts of them.. that and folded up peices of paper.. the interfeaces are a little bloated in your pocket after a bit but I find them very effective.

  122. To Do List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Find Killer Calendar
    2. Make sure Killer Calendar pays for its crimes
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

  123. Nokia to the rescue! by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

    I use the built-in organizer on my cell phone for most of my scheduling needs. It beeps in my pocket before all appointments to let me know I'm going to be late. My life got a lot easier when I figured that out.

  124. Gator's DataManager by chap_hyd · · Score: 1

    hey.. does anybody use this adware to keep track of thier stuff... longago i found a ripped version of this Datemanager somewhere in google. from that time, i am using it. for simple reminders it works gr8...

  125. Simple... by buchan · · Score: 1

    Knotes

  126. Duh by Frosty-B-Bad · · Score: 1

    Post-It notes, the only way.

  127. iCal hands down by Emperor+Tiberius · · Score: 1

    iCal hands down. I use it on my laptop, which I use at both work and home. It manages my to-do list, and my appointments. It also functions as a great alarm clock with some Perl/Applescript kung fu.

  128. Low-tech todo list is best by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    Over the years I've tried dedicated programs, spreadsheets, pencil & paper, PDAs, etc.

    For TODO list, I've found that the best is a flat text file, 3 columns x ~80 lines, edited with vim, stored under subversion source control. It fits around 200 items (more than I'm likely to ever actually get around to), and I can see it all at one glance. Left/right/middle column = short/medium/long term. Broken horizontally into major categories like "to get", "house", "work", etc. One or two *s go before high-priority items. The whole thing can be dumped onto a single sheet of paper for pocket portability. The source control system preserves a complete history of my progress over time or lack thereof.

    1. Re:Low-tech todo list is best by vsarunas · · Score: 1

      Have to agree.

      Used a plain text file edited with vim myself. Recently started to use hnb. Works great.

  129. Meeting Maker by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    I use Meeting Maker '99....

    I can book conference rooms... they force me to use it at work.

  130. Rainlendar - Lightweight Calendar/ToDo by ares284 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Personally I use Rainlendar. It looks cool, has a light footprint, and just plain works. It's Windows-only, though =\


    -Ares

    1. Re:Rainlendar - Lightweight Calendar/ToDo by Vickor · · Score: 1

      I second that. It's small, it's easy to use, and it fits nicely onto you're desktop. Of course its no Office 2003, but it provides everything I need: a calendar with icons on special days(tooltip shows the details), an event list w/ time and date, and a todo list that you can cross stuff off on. Brilliant...

    2. Re:Rainlendar - Lightweight Calendar/ToDo by NeurAlien6 · · Score: 1

      i agree. rainlenday, although it can do any of that syncing stuff, works pretty well. super small and lightweight, skinable (if you want to) and just plain does exactly what it's supposed to do: a simple calandar and a todo list. and it's free to boot! excellent little app.

      --
      I'm a lvl25 Artist in the game of Life (tm)
  131. Meeting Maker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Meeting Maker. It is cross platform (servers run on Windows, OS X, Solaris, and Linux).. clients are Windows, OS X, and HTML.

    It is everywhere.. I'm surprised I don't hear it talked about more often.

    http://www.meetingmaker.com/

  132. Yahoo by LordNimon · · Score: 1

    I use Yahoo's calendar. The advantage is that it's cross-platform, so as long as I have a web browser, I can view and edit the calendar. The drawback is that it's missing a few features, so I'd rather set up my own. Does anyone know of a free calendar program that I can install on my web server? My ISP controls the web server, so I have limited configuration. It also needs to be compatible with MySQL.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  133. Palm desktop by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 1

    I'm still using it. I've found it to be far more usable than the alternatives. I think providing it as freeware was one of the smartest bits of marketing to come out of Palm. It's a pity they've stepped backward from that.

  134. Psion Agenda by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I have lived most of the past decade and a half in the "Agenda" programs included in Psion's PDAs. The EPOC5 version has everything I need: customised alarms, recurring events (by almost any formula), multiple prioritised to-do lists, embedded notes... I seriously haven't figured out what features it could be missing. Maybe someone who's used the more recent Symbian versions can clue me in.

    As a 5-year-old release, the Agenda version I'm using is probably getting hard to synch up with desktop- or network-based apps, but I've never really seen much point in doing that. I can check it whether I'm at the office, at home, or anywhere else, after all.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  135. try yahoo.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of us are glad that google is not (yet) trying to be the kitchen sink like yahoo.

  136. Use ScheduleWorld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a cool calendaring program written in Java that I use. Check it out at www.scheduleworld.com. It reads open format calendars, runs on the server and emails reminders!
    Cheers!

  137. Don't forget syncing capabilities of iCal by SashaMan · · Score: 1

    I know others have brought up iCal, but the reason I really love it is that it makes it very easy to sync appointments and todo lists with the web (.Mac) and my cell phone (a Sony Ericsson T616).

    I love my cell phone - it's small and simple and has just enough 'extra' features I like (mainly calendar and an alarm), but before I bought my Mac I didn't have a good way to sync the calendar. With iCal and iSync, I just turn on bluetooth on my cellphone, stick it next to my Powerbook, and click sync - by far the most user friendly syncing technology I've used. I think a lot of people who use PDAs, but mainly just use them for appointments, would be surprised how they could ditch the PDA for a cellphone/iCal combination.

  138. Other people. by Telastyn · · Score: 1

    Keep my own schedule? Peh, why create more work for myself?

    I figure if it's important, someone will remind me.

  139. MeetingMaker by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

    I use MeetingMaker, which runs natively on Windows and OSX, and I run it under Wine on my Gentoo box. It works well, has a utilitarian interface, and most importantly allows me to schedule my co-workers and meeting-rooms as well when I'm planning things. When you want to have a departmental meeting, clicking the "auto-schedule" button is a dream instead of trying to talk about when would be good for everyone. Now if I could just get everyone else to be as anal about keeping it updated.... only thing I don't like about it is the tranceport between MM and other things (PDA's for example) SUCKS and is a pain in the ass to keep working.

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
  140. By far the best calendar application... by Zarxrax · · Score: 1

    ...is Notepad.exe. I've been using it for years and it's not failed me once. Other programs are so bloated! Notepad takes care of everything you need in only 68KB! Not only is it perfect for managing appointments and important dates, you can also jump right over to writing code on it, without having to learn a cumbersome new interface.

  141. Tasks web app by bulletman · · Score: 1

    I'm a big fan of King Design's Tasks:

    http://www.kingdesign.net/tasks/

    It is a web based application (very reasonable priced) that uses php/mysql to organize your tasks. Email reminders, notes, and nesting for both tasks and notes are both supported. Attaching files and urls to items is another feature I use a lot.

    If you don't want to host and configure it yourself, Usetasks is a good option:

    http://www.usetasks.com/

    Stephen

  142. gaping void awaiting the killer app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Calendaring is an area that is just waiting for someone to develop the killer app. I've looked at everything on the market. Popular choices are Ecco (discontinued), Info Select (by Micro Logic), and MS Outlook. None are good enough.

    I prefer Linux and open source.

    Here is the needed feature list:

    • PIM integration. Calendar and PIM just go together. E-mail and address books are also needed.
    • Search. This is big. You want to have one search interface that can connect you to both the Internet and desktop search (like Google Desktop or Copernic). This same interface must also search your calendar/PIM data.
    • Device Independence: Users need the same program on their PC or Mac and their Palm or Win CE device. If you can't have all the features and data on the handheld, you stll need a subset of the most important features.
    • Perfect synchornization of data between the desktop/notebook and the handheld.
    • Rock solid reliability so you don't lose data.
    • Extensibility. You sometimes need to put a two-word entry into your calendar for a certain day. Sometimes you need to make that a 1,000 word entry. There needs to be a way to extend the data field so you can do that. Sometimes you will want to add 10,000 words of notes about a particular person in your address book.
    • Share calendars over the Internet with strangers. You sometimes need to sync an event with a certain person or group far away.
    • Collaboration. The calendar/PIM obviously has to work great within your group or organization.
    • Customizability of interface. Everyone handles their affairs a little differently. You've got to make this killer calendar/PIM very flexible. Skinnability and toolbar customization are musts. The more flexibility, the better.
    • Customizability of data structures. The calendar/PIM should have a full database manager built in so you can create totally new applications and bolt them on to your calendar/PIM. This would also create a nice third-party add-on market, a huge boon for users.
    • Encryption of certain kinds of data. It shouldn't be hard to encrypt certain kinds of data (such as "Dear Diary" entries or personal notes). The point of having an electronic calendar/PIM is that it is partially open to the outside world, and the extent of that openness should be deteremined by the user.
    • Standards. It's got to work with the existing standards.
    • Database. In the end, this killer calendar/PIM is a database. It needs to be easy to setup and customize like MS Access or better.
    • Easy import and export of data. This is important because if it is easy to get into and out of, users will feel comfortable keeping their data in your program.
  143. hula by hitchhacker · · Score: 1


    Hula: Hula is a calendar and mail server. We want to build a real web-based calendar: to make it trivially easy to publish a calendar, to invite anyone with an email address to an an appointment and process their RSVPs, to get to your calendar via HTML or RSS or with an instant messenger or with SMS.

    It's an actively developed open-source derivative of Novell's NetMail

    -metric

    1. Re:hula by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Google JWZ's commentary on this, I think it's for the most part spot on.

      What, you didn't think _I_ would bother finding that link again? I'm a lazy sysadmin!

      Ohh, all right..

      http://www.jwz.org/doc/groupware.html

      (But I'm not going to a hrefitize it for you, just copy and paste... Ooh, /. did it for me! Neat!)

    2. Re:hula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jwz's comment was on the "groupware" term, and was taken into account. the project Friedman was thinking of got dropped and Hula got started as a result of jwz's feedback.

  144. Text ToDo lists... iCal/Remind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a calendar app, I'm currently using iCal because it syncs with my Palm (albeit poorly, thanks Apple). I really like Remind and I would commit to using it if I could get it to sync with the Palm (I'm tempted to use Remind anyway, regardless of the Palm, I could always output Remind to HTML and sync it with Plucker or something).

    For todo lists, I have completely adopted the David Allen Getting Things Done method and I just use plain old text files which I can sync with NoteTaker on my Palm (and vim on the desktop for super rapid processing better than any Todo app I've ever seen).

    I'm just a Hipster PDA away from being Merlin Mann.

  145. Good point by Codebender · · Score: 1

    I have never found a software package that adequately replaces my Moleskine.

  146. Talk about over-engineering, people by defile · · Score: 1

    I saw someone pick up a Tablet PC the other day. He played with it gleefully, and showed me the coolest app: Microsoft Journal.

    Behold: it looks just like a marble notebook page that you can write on with a "pen" thanks to the touch screen! It allows you to save notes and even try to digitize the text! I remarked that it was quite indeed an impressive piece of technology for only $3000.

    When am I going to get one? Probably not anytime soon, since I've discovered a much better solution for myself: a small attache journal and a fountain pen. Total cost: about $50 (I splurged on the pen).

    Check it out, with the journal I can:

    1. Quickly jot down a phone number
    2. Scribble a username/password that some shitty download site made me invent (sun/java) so I can come back later in case I download the wrong file
    3. Make up to-do lists
    4. Schedule items on said to-do list
    5. Intra-office messaging (scribble on a page, rip it out, leave it on someone's desk)
    6. Keep track of confirmation numbers after you make a stock sale or order cable service or whatever
    7. Note what exactly you FedExed (you note the tracking number, too) to who so you can really say with conviction that you sent Schedule C to your accountant
    8. Scribble down thoughts as they relate to a business deal, or personal matter, or whatever. Helps you keep an eye on the goal, and maintain a consistent position.
    9. Draw little pictures to kill time

    It's always on me, requires no external power source, and is quite pleasing to use. No spyware, viruses, hackers, hardware failures, or bugs to worry about.

    Plus, since the pen is a indispensible part of the equation, you always carry it on you, and can sign your name with a flourish on a credit card receipt, or otherwise display the quality of your pedigree to impressionable onlookers.

    I've also found that, at least when I speak now, I slightly better organize my thoughts before I open my mouth since it's a pain in the ass to re-word a paragraph that you've half-written. This journal dialogue transfers to my vocal dialogue, for some reason.

    Oh, also, cursive handwriting is the shit. I forgot how much I loved it.

    Yes, it's the ultimate personal assistant. Between you and me, I think these things are going to be BIG!

    1. Re:Talk about over-engineering, people by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "a small attache journal and a fountain pen"

      Yes, it makes quite an interesting technogadget. But being small and portable makes it easy to lose it.

      When was last time you backuped it just in case?

  147. Post-it notes by NeuroKoan · · Score: 1

    Portable, can stick to my cell phone, and are easily disposable when I'm finished. They are also compatible with any monitor and computer.

    Maybe I'm just lucky I don't live in a world where my life is not yet run by appointments or where an audible alarm is necessary for reminding me where I need to be. Maybe some day it'll happen, but until then the post-it notes suit me just fine.

    --

    "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
  148. My Wife by HexaByte · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seriously, I never have to boot up to see what there is to do next, (some times she gives me the boot to get me going!), and she has this knack of being able to track me down and remind me of things no matter how far I am from a computer.

    I suppose some of you have a secretary that does the same, but the beauty I married is a beast when it comes to reminders, and I'll bet there's none better!

    --
    HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
    1. Re:My Wife by Kwirl · · Score: 1

      Is she shareware?

    2. Re:My Wife by HexaByte · · Score: 1

      I share her with my 2 daughters and soon will also share her with the as-yet-unknown-what-it-is child arriving this December.

      Certain pleasures of hers, of course, I share with no one!

      --
      HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
    3. Re:My Wife by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

      So, when are you upgrading to version 2.0?
      :p

  149. Calendar's and mobility by nielo · · Score: 1

    Personally for me what I look for in a good Calendaring solution is something that is in a digital format(allows for easy editing and provision to have data backed up).

    However, I also want this to be mobile as often I want to access such information when I'm driving somewhere (where was that place I'm meant to be going to at 1pm again?). Or at other times when I'm going somewhere and don't want to lug a huge laptop.

    I guess everyone's different but for my requirements my Palm Zire does pretty well. It's also pretty cheap.

    I find the Palm Desktop software to be pretty adequate and there is reasonably good open source palm software around too.

    IMHO the ultimate would be storing all contacts, to-do, and calendaring data on a mobile phone style device. However at present the current interfaces to these either make the mobile the size of a PDA anyway or have input methods that take to long to enter data and are frustrating.

    I guess in the future it may be possible, perhaps with voice input it might get rid of the frustrating sms-style keyboards.... who knows....

  150. My Brain by AgentAce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't need a damn piece of software to tell me what I have to do next, I'm quite capable of remembering on my own.

    1. Re:My Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is everyone, that's not the point. Calendars are a tool to give you the freedom to forget.

  151. Palm Desktop 4.1.4 is freely downloadable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a couple folks who continue to use Palm Desktop even after ditching their PDA.

    The latest version can be downloaded for free at PalmOne.com

  152. Active Desktop Calender by BRUTICUS · · Score: 0

    I used a software for a while called Active Desktop Calender it was quite interesting. A calender sat on your desktop overlayed on top of your desktop and would show you the day and which days had tasks or appontments and what they were.

    Id be using it now but I dont have a computer of my own.

  153. I prefer my own web-based organizer by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    but you don't hear me though!

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  154. how about this rails app? by werdnapk · · Score: 1

    Since we've had a rails article today, what about this rails web todo app from the creators or rails itself... http://www.tadalist.com/

  155. MOD UP by ihatewinXP · · Score: 1

    >I'd have to argue.
    >
    >iCal is not only 100% less bloated it's also much easier.....

    I use iCal everyday and all I can say is:

    MODERATORS, MOD UP +1 FUNNY

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
  156. Project / Task Management Software by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Informative

    All,

    I have been meaning to ask this question to the community here for a while.

    I am looking for good task management software. And I haven't seen anything yet that does what I need. Please let me explain.

    I'm a project manager and Architect (software development) with 5 direct reports and an Offshore Team which I co-manage with others. It's a large project...30 people, over 4 years.

    At any given time I have approx 125 tasks out there, for myself and my team. I have been having a hard time keeping track of stuff using excel and pen and paper.

    I've considered writing the software I need (possibly in perl/perltk/mysql) but I don't have the time.

    I'm looking for something more flexible than MS Outlook...which is way too simple, but not as top heavy as MS project (which I use for long term planning...but does not really do what I need for task management).

    I should be able to assign a task with:
    -5 levels of priority
    -Task description
    -Status (not yet assigned, assigned, in progress, cancelled, hold, late, completed)
    -Proposed start and end dates
    -Actual start and end dates
    -Assign primary responsibility, backup, and off responsible helper
    -Task due to (group or individual)
    -Category (by my definition)
    -Sub-category (by my definition)
    -Status comments (by date)

    It should have the ability to assign subtasks to a task... for example, task 10, which is a UAT release, is dependant on task 15 which is a daatabase refresh assigned to our DBA. This requirement sounds like MS Project but I really don't need top heavy project plannig software in this case... just task management.

    Yhe tool should be able to generate reports and .csv files. For example : report of what's due for completion this week, or everything of priority 1 that is late to the clients)

    I should also be able to program it with a simple schedule, say a schedule of software releases and I should get reminders of what's coming up in the next X period of time.

    I am sure that someone else has needed this level of detail and control, and has this problem already solved. Any help would be appreciated.

    Thanks,
    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Project / Task Management Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am sure that someone else has needed this level of detail and control, and has this problem already solved. Any help would be appreciated.

      Well, you seem like you probably wouldn't be convinced otherwise, but I've personally decided all that "micromanagement" stuff like "priority", "status", and "dependencies" is just useless and counter-productive.

      It just gives you the illusion that you've somehow taken the whirlwind of stuff everybody needs to do and "captured" in the computer. And therefore "controlled".

      Then when your team doesn't update the progress, doesn't pay attention to the priorities, etc., etc., you decide that either 1) your team sucks or 2) your tool sucks. But the whole idea of computer-based project management sucks, that's the problem.

      I don't have quite the same situation as you (I have maybe 20 projects, 5 active at a time, teams no larger than 10), but I've settled on basecamp. It's really just a glorified bulletin board. I agree with the creators: project management is just a communications issue, nothing else.

      With basecamp you can post messages and receive messages. You can create milestones with dates and responsible parties. There's no hierarchy, no gant charts, no fluff. Just a place for everybody to communicate.

      You might want to check it out....

    2. Re:Project / Task Management Software by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I think you have described some of the major features of a good project management program. Really, every feature you require is there in any good PM tool.

      You should look at the small number of project management tools out there. I used to like CA-Superproject, but I don't know if it is still supported or available.

      I don't understand why you don't want to use a project management tool when your needs seem to fit such a tool.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Project / Task Management Software by catscan2000 · · Score: 1

      Bugzilla does exactly that and is what I use at work and at home, though the proposed and actual start/end dates may have to take the form of "version," "milestone," "keywords," or a combination of those. Categorization can occur through a combination of "project," "component," "version," and/or "keywords."

      The Bugzilla web site exists at: http://www.bugzilla.org/

    4. Re:Project / Task Management Software by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

      http://www.expressdynamics.com/

      I talked with the guy who wrote it and he gave me a tour of it. Sounds like what you need.

      Written in PHP, too.

    5. Re:Project / Task Management Software by Gribflex · · Score: 1

      You want omnioutliner.
      I have very similar needs, and I have been very dissapointed with products offerings. Go check out omnioutliner and see what they have to offer.

      If you can live without the reports and reminders, I think you will find it will do exactly what you are looking for.

      If you need reports and reminders, then you do need to find something like project (although I sympathize with you for not wanting to go this route).

      One problem that you may find with omnioutliner is that it only runs on OS X. This means you would either need to be running a mac currently, or would need to purchase one in order to use the software. That's an expensive piece of free software.

      I recomend giving it (and a mac, if need be) a try. It really is great.

    6. Re:Project / Task Management Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looking for software to do your job for you? how trivial... there's no such thing...

    7. Re:Project / Task Management Software by DuncanE · · Score: 1

      Hmmm sounds like you need bugzilla. Just load each task as a bug?

    8. Re:Project / Task Management Software by Chriscypher · · Score: 1

      I've been looking for an open-source, LAMP-based, non-abandoned, production-ready solution which could also do time tracking. Best I've found so far is TUTOS. The demo off their homepage is in german, but there is an english online demo hosted (somewhere). It's worth considering. (And no, I have no bias or connection with this project). Good luck!

      --
      "You have liberated me from thought."
    9. Re:Project / Task Management Software by gsyswerda · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you are looking for is Ecco Pro. It was discontinued years ago, but there is still an avid support group.

      The closest thing I've found in current software is ShadowPlan (codejedi.com). It runs on Palm Pilots. There is a desktop version, but it is incomplete.

      --
      Make a difference: move to a swing state.
    10. Re:Project / Task Management Software by klykken · · Score: 1

      http://www.dotproject.net/

      Features Include

      * User Management
      * Email based trouble Ticket System, (Integrated voxel.net's ticketsmith)
      * Client/Company Management
      * Project listings
      * Hierarchical Task List
      * File Repository
      * Contact List
      * Calendar
      * Discussion Forum
      * Resource Based Permissions

      --
      Looks like a fish, drives like a fish, steers like a cow.
    11. Re:Project / Task Management Software by Dave21212 · · Score: 2, Interesting


      My advice, IBM Lotus Domino products. It's the most powerful, flexible, and comprehensive tool out there. Technically, it's a software development platform for collaboration and messaging. But there's a subset of tools called "Quickplace" which includes out-of-the-box features that I think would be perfect for you.

      From the IBM Quickplace site:
      * Provides anytime, anywhere access to collective knowledge, information-sharing, tasks and team calendar events whether on-line or disconnected.
      * Seamlessly establishes a working community with a sense of accountability, whether team members are centralized or geographically dispersed.
      * Increases team productivity and efficiency by virtualizing asynchronous collaboration processes, and optionally integrates them with real time.
      * Increases responsiveness among colleagues, customers, business partners and suppliers by facilitating instant formation of working teams -- whether team members reside within or beyond the organization.
      * Facilitates faster, collective decision making by centralizing timely and accurate information, and granting all team members equal opportunity to review and react.
      * Helps make your teams more productive and self-sufficient through easy, instant assembly of collaborative applications using team space templates -- with just a browser.


      I've been using it for years, and I still haven't found anything I can't get it to do. Note that it's not for transactional systems (airline ticket systems) and it's not a relational database system (which is a plus!), but it's just perfect for what you described...

      My email is shown here at Slashdot (thank you SpamCop), so please feel free to email any questions you might have and I'd be happy to help. I'm not a consultant and I'm busy anyway, so I can't build you a system or anything (this is not a pitch:), but I would be happy to field any questions you have (I have about 10 years experience with Domino).

      Don't miss the developerWorks site for Domino (plenty of info), and feel free to ask questions in the forums (it's a friendly group!).

      --
      "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
    12. Re:Project / Task Management Software by AWG · · Score: 1

      I was in the same situation you are once. Then I found Mantis! It's basically everything you would think to code yourself, except it's already done! Very nicely documented (and customizable) php code & mysql code as well.

    13. Re:Project / Task Management Software by Smoking · · Score: 1

      You look like the perfect customer for Atlassian JIRA http://www.atlassian.com/
      It's cheap and it perfectly fills your requirements list.
      Q.

  157. Evolution! by tempest303 · · Score: 1

    Evolution has a fantastic calendar. It's on the heavier side for RAM, and it's Linux-only, but the current development on Evo is focused, among other things, on reducing resource usage and porting to Windows...

  158. GroupWise by mschlawin · · Score: 1

    Runs great and has tons of features. Works on Netware, Windows and Linux. New Novell PDAConnect program works like a champ.

  159. Todo Lists by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    It almost seems a bit of a pen-and-paper approach, but I use spreadsheets for my TODO lists. I used to use Pocket PC's Tasks to do this, and the equivalent tool on the Palm, but I found the categories and priorities too limiting.

    So now I use Pocket Excel on my PDA (which interacts nicely with Office and StarOffice and such). I make up a little spread sheet, have tabs (sheets) for each major category (home, work, etc.), and customized columns as I need them (date due, priority, etc.)

    The spreadsheet functionality lets me sort, print, create views, search, and so on. Ordering, inserting, deleting, all much faster than the dedicated applications.

    I wish there were the killer app for TODO's (and calendaring), but for now, spreadsheets are the way to get what I want. Nothing else seems flexible enough.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  160. Only one problem by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    The idiots at Novell didn't bother to quality test the sync features of Evolution 2.0 AT ALL.

    It's Palm sync features are totally broken. It will always dupe every contact in my Treo 600's contact list, and will also destroy any category info I've set.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Only one problem by versus · · Score: 1

      use Multisync instead: pair palm plug-in with evo2 plug-in.

      --
      Brain is my second favorite organ.
    2. Re:Only one problem by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Already tried that, same problem

      Would be nice if Evo alone Just worked

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  161. plan/netplan: solid OSS by Xtifr · · Score: 1
    Plan and Netplan are pretty nice, and they've been around for years.

    Advantages:
    • Free/Open Source
    • Single or multi-user
    • Old and fairly robust
    • Optional command-line appointment entry
    • has official IANA assigned port (netplan)
    • PDA sync available through PilotManager
    Disadvantages:
    • Unix/Linux only
    • Requires Motif/Lesstif (hence the previous)
    • Not widely known
    • A little fussy to configure sometimes
    • Uses identd for auth - not for use on the open Internet
    It's a simple system, but works fairly well on a single machine or small LAN.
    1. Re:plan/netplan: solid OSS by Boris_SDC · · Score: 1

      I used this for a few years and it was great in terms of features. In the end I dropped it because I hated the Motif widget set. It looked _really_ horrible next to my mostly GTK programs. But, tastes vary and I am certainly no authority on style.

  162. Notepad by csharp_wannabe · · Score: 1

    I create a TODO.txt file and keep my life organized through that. Thats as complex as it gets...

    --
    "C++ is to C as Lung Cancer is to Lung"
  163. Manual labour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep a paper to-do list, a whiteboard for immediate upcoming events and a paper calendar for longer term things. As much as I love computers, this is the only way I can look whenever I want on what is coming up.

    Works remarkably well, too.

  164. Who's got nested tasks? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Which PIM package has nested tasks? Frequently, I'll add a bunch of tasks to my task list, but some of them depend upon other tasks. No package I've seen so far will do this. Sure, I can put them into categories, but categories don't work the way that nested tasks should.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Who's got nested tasks? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      KOrganizer coupled with Karm (from the KDE PIM package) do this (categories, nested tasks, time spent, start and due dates, percentage done, task members, attached files...) while still not perfectly: they still step each other, but it will work fine if you have opened only one of them at a time.

  165. desktop reminder - clock by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    Try this for windows.

    http://www.karenware.com/powertools/pttimecop.asp

    desktop reminder clock notifier

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  166. Until its shareable... by esconsult1 · · Score: 1
    It's not worth a hill of beans. Single user calendars are usually worth the time to talk about. Shareable calendars are. And that's what the Open Source world is seriously missing.

    My shop recently switched over to Exchange from a sweet Qmail/vpopmail toaster setup, solely because we wanted the shared calendar. The exchange server hiccups every few days, but its worth it for the shared tasks.

    When, oh, when, is someone going to code a decent exchange replacement that does not require over 100 RPM's to install?

    1. Re:Until its shareable... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "My shop recently switched over to Exchange from a sweet Qmail/vpopmail toaster setup, solely because we wanted the shared calendar"

      As if there is no open source shared calendar or even whole groupware suites (like eGroupware or Kolab) over there.

      "And that's what the Open Source world is seriously missing."

      I'd say it is proper knowledge from your side about suitable open source solutions that is seriously missing.

      "When, oh, when, is someone going to code a decent exchange replacement that does not require over 100 RPM's to install?"

      And what would be the matter with a proper solution even if it requires 100 RPM's to install? You just told Qmail/vpopmail was a decent e-mail solution for you, and I bet the box you had for this purpose did require well over 100 RPM's, and you didn't saw a problem with that!

  167. Missing? by circusboy · · Score: 1

    No, it's there. Scared the shit out of me the other day when I had left it plugged into the speakers when I went to bed.

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  168. Notes by a3217055 · · Score: 1

    Lotus Notes, does the job gets me to schedule with my work colleagues. Also knows when I will be out too . . .

  169. palm calendar does it all by supersocialist · · Score: 1

    I'm all about the Palm calendar/to-do. For a while I used Agendus Pro but now I'm using the built-in Datebook+ and a third-party package called To Do Plus. On my desktop I used Tinnes software's Desktop Calendar, which is a very nice solution that unfortunately doesn't sync with anything.

  170. Re:Outlook, for understanding words as well as dat by The+Conductor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On that topic...does anyone know how to turn that feature off? I am in China right now. Your tomorrow is my today. My yesterday is your today. Ack, the clock on the wall doesn't always match the clock on the PC!

  171. tree by iowa119900089 · · Score: 1

    I prefer the dead tree model. I am forced to see it as I walk out my front door.
    I also like... cough... sort of like apples iCal or whatever it is called.

  172. the real need? by circusboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use iCal and it does for me, personally, especially since it syncs happily with 'basecamp.'

    But this is just for me. The real strength of Outlook, (as it has been mentioned before,) is really it's connection to an Exchange server. The problem is that it ties you to an Exchange server.

    If anyone has ties to the P2P networking world, *This* and not simple file sharing, would seem to be the killer app.

    can you imagine the ability to link and unlink with various groups and schedules via a peer to peer protocol? If there were a convenient way to connect a group of people's scheduling etc. without having to maintain a central server? and be able to segregate the views based on selected groups?

    hmmmmmm.

    though I suppose that you always need a central server for those who only occasionally connect, but that might be relatively easy...

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    1. Re:the real need? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "The real strength of Outlook, (as it has been mentioned before,) is really it's connection to an Exchange server. The problem is that it ties you to an Exchange server."

      It ties you and your whole organization to an Exchange server... and a Windows Server, and Windows clients.

  173. I use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    synapses in my head that fire in freaky patterns and frequently fucks up as my girlfriend would testify to.....

  174. SchoolBell Calendar Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to have some potential.
    I'm just waiting for LDAP support :(

    http://www.schooltool.org/schoolbell/

  175. Webcal from U. Texas by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Maorong Zou's Webcal:
    http://www.math.utexas.edu/users/mzou/webCal/index .html

    It runs on Apache and it works. Need I say more?

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Webcal from U. Texas by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      We run this calendar at work, for several years now. It is really stable, and full-featured.

      We have 250 users that share calendars on a server. I think the Mozilla calendar is not worthy to look at until they at least have some way of shared calendar support within a company.

  176. cron by ziegast · · Score: 1

    0 8 20 6 * /usr/bin/Mail -s "Do not forget your anniversary this year." my-pager@my-domain.com < /dev/null

  177. Convea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks to have pretty sweet calendaring features. Might be worth a look when they *finally* get it out, only been waiting a couple of years.

  178. Try ximian by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
    I use it all the time. Comes with most popular distros - Fedora Core, Suse, etc.. Does mail, calendar and even sync's up with my palm. Using a calendar server out there, my entire family can share calendars and set up another one to sync the work calendar.

    There is also the benefit of NOT getting all the viruses, spyware and other malware that plagues Outlook. Nothing from Microsoft is used to get compromised. Ximian doesn't have a todo, they call it tasks and they can be shared as well via calendar server. Much easier to set up than an exchange server.

    I have used both recently and I think they are very close functionally. However not having to worry that an e-mail has the exploit-du-jour for outlook makes using ximian a no brainer. What are you waiting for? Get rid of outlook. Yes, they do spellcheck as well. Works with ldap... just try it for a month!

  179. how about integration with other programs by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I frequently hear discussion of the most wanted features, such as different calendar formats, integration with other handhelds, etc.

    How about integration with other calendar programs.

    iCal, Netscape Calendar, and Outlook- none of them actually work with each other (sorry, they DO NOT despite what anyone has told you; for example, an iCal calendar item's title won't show up properly in Mozilla Calendar.)

    It's pretty astounding that a simple file format like a frigging CALENDAR can't be standardized across calendar programs which all claim to be able to use the same...uh...standard file format.

    Most of the dependency on Outlook would be eliminated if all these programs generated the same invitation format emails.

    1. Re:how about integration with other programs by helix400 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Whoa, calm down there.

      (sorry, they DO NOT despite what anyone has told you; for example, an iCal calendar item's title won't show up properly in Mozilla Calendar.)

      I never said they did. I'm just saying they're revamping the product to handle multiple handhelds. I should have also mentioned that they want to be able to work with other calendars as well. I assume that Sunbird 0.2 has many bugs, which they are aware of, and hope to fix.

      It's pretty astounding that a simple file format like a frigging CALENDAR can't be standardized across calendar programs which all claim to be able to use the same...uh...standard file format.

      It must be hard, isn't it? To be so much smarter than the rest of the world, to know exactly how Calendar programs should work. But sadly, nobody else has the wisdom and insight you do...

      Seriously, I'm done with you. I can't believe someone bothered replying to a simple informative post with yelling and ranting.

  180. How about HNB? by stuq · · Score: 1

    I *love*hierarchical notebook - http://hnb.sourceforge.net/

    HNB is a curses program to structure many kinds of data in one place, for example addresses, to-do lists, ideas, book reviews or to store snippets of brainstorming.

    Lovely thing to log in to my server at work via ssh and have my todo list in a term.

    The developer, Øyvind Kolås, is also a maniac for eliminating extraneous keystrokes during entry, which makes this prg rank #1 for me.

  181. PHProjekt by abandonment · · Score: 1

    http://www.phprojekt.com/

    open source groupware - includes calender, export & import of contacts, web-based email (sorta hurting mind you, no anti-spam etc), todo management as well as web-based file management among other things.

    i've been using it for a few years and it does the trick very well - particularly if you are frequently online and need to get that one useful piece of info from anywhere.

    todo's can be assigned to projects, specifically to individual contacts, you can have any number of notes per contact (useful for phone discussion logs) and also has built in 'bug tracking' as well.

    we use it for all of our project management simply because i haven't found anything else as useful.

    no matter HOW useful outlook is, there's no way that it is worth the license fee and yearly tax that is required to set it up and keep legit...

    other web-based options:

    http://www.phpcollab.com/

    phpcollab is a bit easier on the eyes than phprojekt, but seems to complicate the process more than it should be.

  182. Pocket PC by jdhawke · · Score: 1

    I use my Pocket PC running Windows Mobile 2003 and the Agenda Fusion PIM software from http://www.developerone.com/agendafusion/. Handles the calendar/to-do/address book/journal functions very nicely.

  183. The Best by SysJames · · Score: 2, Informative

    The best one is: ECCO. A free abondonware from NetManage. Available free at: ftp://ftp.netmanage.com/support/pub/utilities/EC40 1/Ecco32/. For windows only currently, but in the process of going open source.

  184. My brain. by Gyga · · Score: 1

    I use my brain...uh...I'm late! I'm late! I very very late! I really need to get a watch, or reset the clock on my computer.
    --
    When we look back on all we accomplished we think, oops.

    --
    I don't preview or spellcheck.
  185. My Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just remember to do things, which is probably why I get everything done late. I need a good pda.

  186. My problem.. by jvagner · · Score: 1

    ..is that I'd probably switch from Thunderbird to Evolution *IF* Evolution shipping with the plug-in that let you copy an email to a task. I'm not about to embark on re-compiling the whole damned thing everytime I upgrade versions just to get this very basic, should-be-included-automatically feature.

  187. They don't by mungtor · · Score: 1

    How many entries for "hang around in parent's basement playing Everquest" does anybody really need?

    Just proves that most free software is copied from ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^ err.. "inspired by" commercial software. /yeah, trolling. //still not wrong.

  188. Right On! Psion is the best! by wernst · · Score: 1
    Though I live and die by Agendus on my Palm Pilot, Psion's Agenda is just the best "daytimer" software in the world, on ANY platform.

    I *still* miss my Psion for this sort of thing. (I needed wireless internet for my work, and had to switch.)

  189. Rainlendar by dimmak · · Score: 1
    I prefer rainlendar from http://www.ipi.fi/~rainy/index.php?pn=projects&pro ject=rainlendar. As mentioned in another post this is only for windows, but the server can be ran on linux also, so possibly there is a way to have a linux client too. I have looked high and low for a mac equivalent, but I only have some various dashboard widgets. If anybody knows of a rainlendar clone for ppc, please point me in the right direction. Thanks.

    --

    slashdot me at http://www.sledgehammercomputers.com/ then totally obliterate me with remote help requests :)
    --
    http://www.sledgehammercomputers.com
  190. mupo by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

    I've always been of the opinion that if you have to use software to schedule your meetings, you have too many meetings. I have no need or desire to share my schedule with others, so I found calendar/todo software pretty useless - until I found Mupo.

    It's primitive, but the very important thing it gets right is the nature of to-dos. They can recur ("take out the trash" every Wednesday night), and they stack up if not completed ("water plants", set as a to-do for every Wednesday, will still be on my list Thursday if I neglect to do it). I have a lot more "to-do" items than appointments, and Mupo is very useful in helping track them.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  191. My head by Eq+7-2521 · · Score: 1

    If I don't remember an event/task then it wasn't really important.

    --
    At my age I find coming up with a witty signature too exhausting.
  192. 37signals is teh hawt by dr.badass · · Score: 1

    What about your 'To Do' List?"

    I started using Ta-Da List the day it launched and haven't looked back since. It's incredibly simple, free, web-based, and endlessly useful. I have a dozen other tools on my computer that can handle to-do lists (with syncing, priorities, due dates, etc), but Ta-Da List's basic approach makes it more useful than any of them.

    37signals (the makers), also run two similar-but-different web-based organization apps, Backpack and Basecamp, that I highly recommend. All of them can be used for free.

    --
    Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  193. Lotus Organizer by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

    Lotus Organizer is really great. It even runs under Linux (thanks to Wine). Unfortunately, it's showing its age (the last release was 1999, and IBM seems to have abandoned it). Does anyone here know a good way to migrate the data to something like korganiser?

  194. I like Sunbird by cyberformer · · Score: 1

    It's free and simple: Just a database of events. I'd prefer to be able to see more than one month at a time, and I don't see much point in the ToDo List, but overall it does the job.

    There's nothing wrong with Outlook, but it's overkill if you're not using Exchange.

  195. Lo-tech by ajservo · · Score: 1

    We use a white board and some dry erase markers.

    Call us out of date, but being bogged down with more software is the last thing we need at work.

  196. jpilot and PDA by dacarr · · Score: 1

    I just use an old Handspring Visor Deluxe and jpilot. Most of what's in my PDA is a checkbook, handyshopper, phonebook and work schedule, so it's pretty easy to keep track of to-do lists.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:jpilot and PDA by Reverse+Gear · · Score: 1

      I too stick with Jpilot and my good old Palm m125.
      It has everything I need.

      I had some problems getting things to sync with Linux back on 2.4 and did more or less stop using my palm-pilot when I switched from windoze to Linux, but after having switched to kernel 2.6 it works like a charm and I have again been able to live a somewhat organised life.

      Still I think that paper versions of datebooks are in many ways superior to pda's.
      I would use a paper version if I had the skill, but for some reason I only seem to my datebook when it is digital.

      I tried to use a paper version a few times and was especially impressed by the speed of typing, the ability to add all kinds of things to the pages and that it never ran out of battery.
      However a problem was that the calendar was always empty even though I was overbooked and I keeped making double appointments, so I had to go back to my palm-pilot again.

  197. Re:Outlook 2003 - Stop the FUD. by cbreaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "(Why would I? I'm on a Mac and I like having free space in my ram.)"

    Stop the insanity!

    I've got Outlook 2003 open to an Exchange 2003 server right now. My mailbox is about 1.3GB. I've got a few add-ons, too, such as the LookOut search tool. It's using 25MB RAM.

    It loads very fast, too.

    For what the application does (it's not just e-mail) I think 25MB is certainly very resonable. Where's all that bloat you mac users like to spread around about Microsoft and Windows and Office?

    Not liking the company is not a reason to lie about the applications they create. I hate Microsoft just as much as the next guy, but I really like Outlook and I look forward to when an OSS replacement app matches it. Evolution is very close, and I think in a few more revisions it'll be there. But it doesn't mean Outlook is crap. It's not.

    And why do you need all that free RAM anyways? I have memory in my computers to use it. Sure, every software developer could write software that uses almost NO memory. But then they'd all run like shit, too. No, I'd rather use all my RAM up if that means my apps run faster. Because, you know. THAT'S WHAT IT'S THERE FOR.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  198. Now Up-to-Date/Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now Up-to-Date/Contact... Mac and Win compat.. can share my schedule to other computers (with NUTD/C installed), can sync to my iPod.. Been my fav calendar since 1998...

  199. Home-Grown by PintoPiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've tried any number of calendar programs out there, including Outlook, iCal, my Clie PDA, various OSS offerings, even the paper and pencil kind.

    In the end, I discovered that there were two issues. First, there was always a couple of things that I liked but couldn't do - sorting, or categorizing - whatever. Second, and more importantly, I never managed to get into a reliable habit of checking my program d'Jour.

    So, I decided to take advantae of what I DO habitually do. I open a web-brower every day with a tablist of sites for daily reading. And I always check my email. Taking advantage of that, I built a small system on top of MySQL for personal use. All the features I want, none that I don't. The main interface is a web form (written in bash of all things - practice for a project at work). It only took a couple hours to get it up and running. It's viewable from anywhere, and it sends me email reminders for those important things.

    The project is nowhere near being ready for release into the wild, even in the event that demand for a mySQL/bash-driven calendar app increased beyond the current estimated level of zero. Nonetheless, there's no vendor lock-in and no difficulty learning the features or making time to check up on the information daily.

  200. Re:Outlook 2003 [Acrobat 7] by chota · · Score: 1

    Umm...

    I hope you realize that Adobe did nothing to stop the bloat of Acrobat 7...

    Instead, they created a "quick-launcher" that starts up with your system, and preloads most of acrobat into memory.

    Don't believe me? Look in your Startup group on your Start menu. :(

  201. Franklin/Covey + Lotus Notes by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    My Franklin planner has a monthly page & a daily page. Loadus Nodes has a handy calender function that can send reminders and automatically accept emailed meeting invitations. The problem of course is that I have to keep all three of these schedules synchronized, which I manage to do about 90% of the time, but it's a major pain, and a major embarassment when I don't. Lotus also allows me to "share" my calender (make it viewable/editable by others), and anyone trying to schedule a meeting with multiple attendees can easily find timeslots when all (or most) people have "empty" time - provided that everyone keeps their calendar up-to-date and shares it out. Now all we need to do is get our conference room scheduling system tied in (it's a totally separate web app).

    Here's a short list of what I'd like to see:

    • daily time slots
    • weekly & monthly views
    • flexible repeat entry scheduling
    • warnings & reminders that go away if the event has long since passed
    • different warning/reminder behavior for meeting vs. appointment vs. reminder vs. anniversary vs. event
    • knowledge of company holidays
    • configurable "weekday" vs. "weekend", including weird schedules that use 40 hr weeks by 10 or 12 hr days.
    • settable by other people via email, but with "exclude user X" capability.
    • viewable by others
    That's all I can think of for now.....
    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  202. Calendar? Who needs a stinking calendar? by scolby · · Score: 1

    If I can't remember it, it ain't worth doing. That's right child support payments, I'm talking to you!

  203. Taskmaster by ColonBlow · · Score: 1

    Taskmaster is great for ToDo's. It doesn't do calendar stuff, and it is windows, but it's free.

    --
    free online diet tracking.
  204. Outlook 2003 - How does it handle attachments? by shlashdot · · Score: 1

    It would be very helpful if someone could tell me, can you specify a folder for incoming attachments? And, are they then independent of the original message (ie not deleted if the message is)? I am using Eudora for this reason, plus I have been turned off by Outlook Express, which seemed to handle attachments horribly.

    --
    Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page.
  205. Scheduling app for the console? by crimson_alligator · · Score: 1

    I use iCal, but I'd rather use something from the command-line.

    Does anyone know of a good schedule/calendar app for the console? I want something screenable and available from any computer on the internet.

    I tried some emacs scheduler thing once, but didn't like it. Perhaps it was because I use vim, not emacs.

  206. I've been asking the same.. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    (Check back, some people actually modded comments as "Troll".. heh.)

    The Mozilla Org's "lightning" project is interesting. I had a question published in one of the interviews with the project leads but didn't get a real answer, more of a vague response.

    Now that Red Hat has released Netscape Directory Server, are there plans to release Netscape Calendaring Server at all?
    How about Oracle Calendar? (Cross platform, works well)
    Isn't Novell doing something?

    Fact is, calendaring in the open source world pretty much sucks. This isn't a troll or flamebait. It's a straight up fact. If it was doing well, would we be asking these kinds of questions? No, because we'd have a decent calendaring application.

    Right now, the best hope is for the Mozilla Foundation folks to bust some ass on Sunbird and make it into a triumphant cross platform application. Look at the features that keep people tied to Outlook and figure out how to make them a reality in the free/oss world.

    Or am I just dreaming?

  207. Thanks for posting that! by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been wondering how Lightning was coming along.

    * Can you send calendar invites to other users?
    * If you can, will the recipient be able to just click it and add it to their calendar?

    Those are two really basic things that are useful to have in a corporate/small business calendaring solution. Sadly, they're features that can tie people into Outlook.. :(

  208. Evolution and iCal by bcs_metacon.ca · · Score: 1

    Evolution on my Linux boxen, iCal on my Mac. Kept in sync via a webDAV published .ics file. Works perfectly, never had a problem with it.

    --

    How appropriate. You fight like a cow.
  209. It's made of dead trees by Vanieter · · Score: 1

    They call it an agenda. yes, on paper !

  210. Outlook 2003 with FranklinCovey Plan Plus tools by jonesboy_damnit · · Score: 1

    I use Outlook 2003 with the FranklinCovey tools ("Seven Habits of Highly Effective People") installed. Being able to organize tasks across a 3x3 matrix of "importance" vs. "urgency", having master and daily task lists, etc. seems like it will be very useful for me with respect to getting organized, ensuring that I deliver what I commit to, etc. An additional nifty feature is associating notes that you take in a meeting with the meeting, and giving you a master list of the notes you've taken... ahhh.
    If you have Outlook, you can download Plan Plus for a 30 day trial here.
    I'm not an agent or representative of the company either, I just think it's a pretty good tool.
    -Matt

  211. glad you asked, i use this bad boy by downsize · · Score: 1

    check out demo calendar
    the todo list kinda sucks (ok it sucks hard) but the calendar works well, and you can put a mini/small calendar on the left folder view and it highlights dates that have appointments on them. I believe you get an email reminder as well (optional).

    --
    do you have shinyfeet?
  212. The Perl-based WebCalendar by BoldAndBusted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really liked the original "WebCalendar": http://www.math.utexas.edu/webcalendar/ . Perl-based, e-mail reminders with daily to-do summary e-mail, supports iCal and VCS file import/export, a shared "corporate caelndar", Free/Busy functionality, nice interface, tooltip information drill-down, GPL'd. No direct Palm support, though. Very stable. I wish the PHP WebCalendar hadn't "borrowed" the name... :(

    I had many happy client users! But, to be fair, Outlook/Exchange supplanted it. I do think the functionality of Outlook/Exchange is quite nice, and is going to be hard for F/OSS to beat.

    1. Re:The Perl-based WebCalendar by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      We run this calendar at work, for several years now. It is really stable, and full-featured.

      We have 250 users that share calendars on a server. I think the Mozilla calendar is not worthy to look at until they at least have some way of shared calendar support within a company.

    2. Re:The Perl-based WebCalendar by cknudsen · · Score: 1

      You can share calendars with Mozilla Calendar. You just need to setup a remote iCal server of some type (like the PHP-based WebCalendar) and configure Mozilla Calendar to have a subscription.

      --
      http://www.k5n.us
    3. Re:The Perl-based WebCalendar by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Maybe I was not clear. What I mean is not a store of calendars that is updated infrequently, but a real shared calendar in which many users can make meeting appointments, book rooms and other resources, etc.

      The Perl WebCalendar can do that. I think Mozilla will only do that in version 2.0 which is far from being released.

  213. Easy by arodland · · Score: 1

    A Palm device, with DateBk5 and ShadowPlan, with no synchronizing to anything, except for backup purposes.

  214. Trumba by JJC · · Score: 1

    I've recently been using Trumba, which is a commercial web-based calendar service that recently came out of beta. It has a nice interface (I think it's just as good as Evolution, which I was using before), and a number of nifty features. It can import and export ICS files (iCal format), although I should mention that the last time I tried it, it didn't import recurring events correctly. I thought the export feature in particular was cool because you don't have to worry about being locked-in to the service. There's also a tool for synchronising calendars with Outlook, but I don't have Outlook so I can't tell you how well it works. Trumba also has quite a large focus on sharing events and calendars between different users and groups of users, but I don't know anyone else using it at the moment, so I haven't tried those features either.

    The best thing about it, of course, is that you can access your calendar anywhere where you can use a web browser. You can get a free 60-day trial and it costs $39.95 a year after that. That's about the same as I pay for my IMAP mail account. I'd prefer it if there was a standard for remote calendaring, but there doesn't seem to be one at the moment, and a web-based service seems to me like a fine substitute in the meantime.

    1. Re:Trumba by JJC · · Score: 1

      Well, silly me. I read another comment, and apparently there is a standard, or at least a draft thereof, which is supported by the various Mozilla calendaring projects.

  215. What about for "Enterprise Calendaring"? by legal_asshole · · Score: 1

    I mean like notes/exchange/etc. Totally not intended as flamebait, are there any open source notes/exchange server alternatives that actually have integration with a decent client that do shared calendars, resource booking, shared todo lists, etc. (all the crap that notes/exchange give you)? Cause I have yet to find anything (I admit I haven't spend a TON of time looking yet...). I'm not talking about, "sure, if you download these 8 projects, and this merge, apply these patches, etc.", I mean a real groupware server that could be a viable Notes/Exchange replacement...

    1. Re:What about for "Enterprise Calendaring"? by Mind+Booster+Noori · · Score: 1

      more.groupware. It's not perfect, but the best I've ever seen, I'm using it heavilly...

  216. korganizer by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    Kontact and/with Korganizer do their thing quite nice.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  217. Omnioutliner and iCal by Gribflex · · Score: 1

    The two best apps I've ever used are Omnigraffle and iCal. Both for the mac.

    iCal can do almost all of the things that I like about outlook (and that list isn't very long) and does it prettier, easier, and it makes more sense. the only thing that it cannot do is coordinate resource scheduling against an exchange server. But that isn't a big loss for me and how I work.

    Omnioutliner is simply amazing. I like to assign myself tasks, and then break them down to subtasks, and then sub-subtasks, ad infinitum Apparently most people don't do this, or so I assume, considering I've only found one decent app to handle this sort of information sorting. Omnigraffle allows me to do this easily, and allows for some very useful features as well (to-do lists with large text fields attached, inserting images into the to do list, cascading summary information amongst tasks and subtasks, etc.)

    Both of these apps were free (as in beer) with my powerbook.

    Since selling my powerbook and switching back to a windows environment for work, I have nearly gone mental without omni outliner. The tasks in outlook are just so lame (as in a duck with no legs) in comparison.

    iCal was replaceable. I just liked how it worked.

    The other alternative that I've used in the past, and really enjoyed, is the Palm desktop.

  218. Due Yesterday by StormShaman · · Score: 1

    For high school students, http://www.nosleep.net/ Due Yesterday is a great little app. I use it on my palm, but it is available for the desktop as well.

  219. What the world was using before... by ignavus · · Score: 1

    I'm a programmer. I program. I avoid meetings, other than impromptu chats with my colleagues and boss.

    The rare appointment I have I ***write on my desk calendar*** - you know, one of those P-A-P-E-R thingies that you flip over each day.

    To do list? Answer emails. Check web servers. Work on the same project that I've been working on for several weeks. Attend to interruptions (they announce themselves - I don't need to plan them). Strangely, I can remember all these items using my b-r-a-i-n. Maybe because they are the same every day.

    PS: You don't actually need a mobile phone, a PDA, scheduling software, electronic calendars. At least, *I* don't.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  220. Alarms by midifarm · · Score: 1
    No it's there if you look. Also, just to let you know, your iPod will also "alarm" if you want it to. Just little things that Apple's people think out very well.

    Peace

  221. unique techniques by menscher · · Score: 1
    My email is always open, and the most recently received messages typically serve as a to-do list. So I set up at(1) or cron(8) jobs to email me reminders to do stuff. This has worked particularly well when I carry a text pager, as the computer can page me before appointments.

    Another odd technique I used was to set an alarm on my HP48GX calculator. It will tell me of the alarm condition when I turn it on. Useful for that old flame whose birthday you've forgotten a few too many times. Set the alarm for a week in advance, and you'll have time to notice it and get a card in the mail.

  222. Oracle Calendar by Jumpy · · Score: 1

    We have to use Oracle Calendar where I work. There is a Linux, Solaris, Mac and Windows version. I think there is a web app version they make availible to us although I never use it. I also think there is a palmOS sync and PocketPC Sync software availible.

    It seems like a decent calender application. I almost always use the Linux version `cause thats the OS I mostly work with every day... (I think it uses Motif on Solaris / Linux)

    Oracle was a little slow, I have to admit, to come up with a version that ran on 2.4 Red Hat kernels when Red Hat first made the switch but their Linux support seems better nowadays...

    --
    -- If there's one thing i can't stand, it's intolerance!
  223. Pen and paper! by Shirloki · · Score: 1

    I'm not trolling with this. I honestly only use pen and paper for appointments. I can't handle scheduling tasks on my computer and then synching to a palm, etc., etc. All the duplicity just slows me down. If I just carry a small planner with me and a pen, I've got everything written down all the time. Best of all, it works during power outages (never read in moon light?) and the batteries never die.

  224. Make Acrobat load quickly! by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can make Acrobat load very quickly by removing most of the plugins. Go to your Acrobat install directory and create a new sub-directory called 'plugins_suck'. Move every file except for 'EWH32.api' and 'search.api' out of the 'plugins' directory into the new 'plugins_suck' directory. Presto! Fast load times for Acrobat.

    --
    "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    1. Re:Make Acrobat load quickly! by tsa · · Score: 3, Informative

      I read somewhere on /. that you can also press the shift key during startup. It then skips all the plugins and loads in the blink of an eye. The amazing thing is that I don't find it any less usable without all these plugins.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:Make Acrobat load quickly! by tenor_clef · · Score: 1

      HOLY CRAP that works - thanks.

      I wish I had known about that oh, say, YEARS ago?

      Macrodobe should share that little titdbit with everyone.

    3. Re:Make Acrobat load quickly! by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Just be sure to leave the FOLDERS that are in there alone. Otherwise Windows will have to redo part of the install and it will take forever to load it.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    4. Re:Make Acrobat load quickly! by AngusSF · · Score: 1
      Here's a GUI that helps control which plug-ins load:

      "Adobe Reader SpeedUp
      Click here to download v1.32 Screenshot

      Adobe Reader SpeedUp is a simple application that was created to help make the loading time of Adobe's Acrobat/Reader software bearable for everyday use. AR SpeedUp only needs to be used once (a process taking only a few seconds) and then your 'Reader will be transformed forever. There are also some tweaking options available. "w00t!", as the young kids say."
      http://www.tnk-bootblock.co.uk/prods/misc/
      --
      "A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything." Shane (1953)
    5. Re:Make Acrobat load quickly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually a fairly standardized feature across most design apps that have had Mac versions over the years. Either hold the shift key or spacebar during launch to disable extensions or bring up an extensions manager. Not sure if the Mac OS (pre-X) had this first, or if the apps did. Either way, it works on lots of things.

    6. Re:Make Acrobat load quickly! by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      Acrobat 7 loads way faster than any prior version. Somebody at Adobe finally woke up.

      Acrobat 7 also plays well with browsers.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    7. Re:Make Acrobat load quickly! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      That's only because it preloads itself via the ever-popular evil that is the Windows Start-Up folder. Kick Adobe out of there and it's right back to it's bloated, slow-loading self.

    8. Re:Make Acrobat load quickly! by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's what it takes to make it perform well, then I have no complaints.

      What is so evil about the Windows start-up folder? It serves a very useful purpose. The problems I have observed have been the over-use or abuse of the start-up folder by 3rd party apps.

      Believe me, I hate MS as much as the next slashdotter, but let's hate them for the right reason.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    9. Re:Make Acrobat load quickly! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      The startup folder in Windows IS good for auto-starting things that you want to have auto-start, but from my perspective not being told during the install that Acrobat will be autoloaded every time Windows starts up, AND that it's going to hog 15-30M bytes of my system RAM just to be able to say "loads faster than v6.0!!!" on their marketspeak webpage is insulting and a big load of BS.

    10. Re:Make Acrobat load quickly! by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      I can't argue that.

      Acrobat is indeed a bloated pig. Given that my choices of PDF viewers is limited, I was glad to see that they did SOMETHING in 7.0 to address the problem. Most of my 'puters are fast enough that the pre-load doesn't seem to be an issue.

      Ideally, it should be re-written from scratch. However, I think the real problem is the over-engineered feature-set. They should have abided by KISS.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  225. Palm zire 72. by rudydog · · Score: 1

    My Palm pilot does a great job.

  226. No software by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    I've never had so many things to do that I couldn't keep them in my head.

  227. Simplify, simplify. by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 1

    If you need a calendar or a to-do list, you need to change your life, not your software.

    1. Re:Simplify, simplify. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      unemployed? single?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  228. Re:For OS X: Entourage 2004 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, but Entourage doesn't support interacting with an Exchange 5.5 machine for anything but IMAP/SMTP. Which means no meeting features work or any of the other gunk layered into it. Pretty much just email. Yes, 5.5 on NT4/2k is fairly pathetic, but you have no idea how many companies are still using this. :(

  229. Palm desktop & Palm by marcovje · · Score: 1


    Why stuff it in your computer? It should be in your PDA!

    Before the Palm I used my Zaurus for a while, but that gradually transformed to a development station, and the instability of the (non SHARP original) OpenZaurus firmware made it less doable for after a while.

    So I bought an old M515 second hand. The thing's batteries last near forever, and the sync software (Palm Desktop), while simple gets the job done for easier PC data entry.

    1. Re:Palm desktop & Palm by Lord+Duran · · Score: 1

      True. And it doesn't even have to be recent. I use a Palm V very effectively and I'm very pleased with it. Plus, my calendar plays chess. Does yours?

    2. Re:Palm desktop & Palm by marcovje · · Score: 1


      Don't know. I don't play with the Palm. The Zaurus is infinitely more fun to play with. (and runs openssh, and Free Pascal Compiler)

      I would be surprised if GNU Chess wasn't ported.

      However the Palm does its job better as a raw PDA than the Zaurus. Probably because it is older (m68k based), the batteries last longer

    3. Re:Palm desktop & Palm by Lord+Duran · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, my palm doesn't really connect to anything. I don't use it to read mail or such. As for the compiler, I find it horrendous to type anything longer than a contact's data at a time, let alone write code. And if I can write it on my PC, why not compile it there, too? (Plus I hate Pascal :)

    4. Re:Palm desktop & Palm by marcovje · · Score: 1

      I'm developer, and since the compiler compiles itself, it is its best testsuite. I typically use it when wired to the PC and then ssh into the PDA's Linux OS. (still the only usuable OS for my Zaurus)

      A collegue also did turn his Zaurus into a useful wifi access point though at a convention. This was done ad hoc, and not prepared, which added enormously to the geek factor :_)

  230. Windates is small cheap and mostly good by rochlin · · Score: 1
    Not open source or even free, but useful: I use Windates -- as a simple back-upable calendar/reminder program with a small footprint. It is iCal compatible, but till I find a good FREE iCAL server, I'm not using that feature. I like it because it has customizable alarms, recurring events, and some other niceties, without sucking up half my RAM. It also remembers old appointments so I can look up old names and such. I used to use outlook, but it was just too clunky and too much 95% of the time.

    Anyone know a good (FREE) iCal server?

  231. First thing is, architects don't manage people by melted · · Score: 1

    Managing developers is a job for development manager and leads reporting to him. Architect should be, ahem, coming up with an architecture. If someone catches an architect writing software to manage people the guy should be fired on the spot because he's wasting money.

    Second thing is, you're headed down the wrong track. No one can effectively manage 125 items at the same time, not even with good software. That's why most if not all development teams divide the entire product cycle into several milestones (3 to 5 usually) with clearly defined work items and deliverables in each. You don't exit the milestone until shit gets done and reaches acceptable level of quality. If schedule doesn't work, you make feature cuts. If you can't cut something, you adjust the schedule.

    By dividing 125 items into five buckets you only get 25 items in each bucket. A perfectly manageable number if you delegate some of the management to development leads. Heck, you can even hold 25 items in your head without any software at all.

    What you're talking about is a slippery bureocratic slope which leads nowhere. You're trying to replace proper planning and management with "a shell script" and that just doesn't work for a thousand of reasons.

  232. My two cents. by Argon+Sloth · · Score: 1

    I find around the office Outlook is the perfect tool, if only for its ability to add appointments to other's calendars. I don't know if there are other programs that did this. At home and for personal matters, I can't guarantee I'll be at my computer for a timer to go off. Instead, I prefer the wall calandar, either the 1 month view or the 4 month variety that are essentially flexible whiteboards with the weeks/etc permanently engraved. I find it more pervasive this way. At a glance I can get an idea of what I have to do, for myself in the next little while. As some one else said, for personal use it's just using the technology for technology's sake, or something along those lines. Just because it can be done, doesn't necessarily mean it's the better way.

    --
    Laziness is a virtue, anyone who bothers to tell you otherwise, is clearly lacking it.
  233. For GNOME, Evolution (integrated) by matt+me · · Score: 1

    As the blog entry below explains (with screenshot), the way the GNOME clock expands to show a simple calendar, with your appointments from Evolution marked on, is GENIUS.

    http://www.actsofvolition.com/archives/2004/july/s impledesktop

  234. Lotus Notes. by Lonesome · · Score: 1

    Lotus Notes.
    It's still years ahead of Outlook.

    --
    End dual-measurement, let's finish going metric!
    http://gometric.us
  235. Re:Chandler Forever by xmuskrat · · Score: 1

    I think Chandler has a lot of great ideas behind it. I hope some day they'll actually finish

    --
    activestudios web design
  236. Ecco Pro by tezza · · Score: 2
    Wow, I can't believe no-one has mentioned Ecco Pro.

    It has:
    * Nested outline notes for everything
    * call tracker
    * looks just awful

    If the last is not too much, check it out. It's great. Available here thands to CompuSol

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
  237. Wikimedia by Scarblac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I installed a Wiki on a webserver, behind a password. It's like using pen and paper with endless paper, it goes with you wherever you have an internet connection, and you have hyperlinks.

    My calendar is just a page with links to pages named 2005-06-12, 2005-06-13, with headers above them for month names. To-do lists, projects, whatever, I can make new pages just by typing a link to them and then starting to edit them.

    --
    I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
  238. Mobile Phone by paulatz · · Score: 1

    Perhaps my answer do not answers your question. I think the killer calendare application is not in you PC but it is you mobile phone.

    --
    this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
  239. Re:Outlook 2003 [Acrobat 7] by ultramkancool · · Score: 0

    I find adobe acrobat 7 loads quite fast on linux, much faster then the old 5.

  240. Old Palm PDA by Boris_SDC · · Score: 1

    I have bought myself a Palm Vx off ebay for £20 and it happily handles all my appointments/todos. I can sync it with my computer whether I am in Linux at home, or if I am unfortunate enough to have to use Windows for work. And I have it with me wherever I go. It also handles all my contacts, which I can beam to/from my mobile phone.

    Before I used gtodo and plan (although I really could not stand the horrible Motif widget set.)

  241. Zaurus SL-5500 + Outlook 2003 by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 1

    I have been using this combo happily for some months. The supplied software syncs well with Outlook and the entries seem to map well onto the Sharp PIM apps.

    The main drawback for me is that I can no longer sync with anything on my Solaris desktop at work (when I used a Handspring Visor I could sync with J-Pilot). Oh, and Sharp seem determined to reserve the Zaurus line for Japan only these days.

  242. What about alternative calendars? by phozz+bare · · Score: 1

    Not everyone out there uses the Gregorian calendar, at least not exclusively. For example, being Jewish I need to keep track of both calendars since many dates are Gregorian, while all our holidays are based on the Hebrew lunar calendar.

    Outlook does an excellent job of juggling both calendars at once, as well as maintaining yearly appointments (such as holidays and birthdays) that can be assigned to either calendar - I can set an appointment to occur either every November 4th or every sixth of Tishrei, and Outlook will not mind.

    I've recently switched to OSX, and it doesn't seem like anything out there still offers this capability. Can anyone enlighten me? Does anything for the Mac support this? Is Sunbird going to have this capability?

    -phozz

    1. Re:What about alternative calendars? by rfc1394 · · Score: 1
      I wanted to send you a message within /. but there does not appear to be any way to do so.

      I am interested in the idea of the Jewish calendar; it might be something interesting to implement. Is there a way to either calculate the days of that calendar (as Zeller's Congruence does for the Gregorian Calendar) or is there a correspondence between the Gregorian and Jewish calendars?

      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    2. Re:What about alternative calendars? by phozz+bare · · Score: 1
      Hi, what software are you developing?

      A bit of googling found this rather full explanation of a method that can be used to convert between Gregorian and Hebrew dates.

      If you plan to add this to a major application such as Sunbird, don't forget that there are a few other calendars (Muslim, Hindu) that will be appreciated by a couple billion users.. :)

      If for any reason you'd like to email me privately, I am itayc at hotmail (however I am no expert on these subjects).

  243. Wiki by Lifewish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I tend to wikify my to-do list. This means that: a) I can get to it from any web-connected computer, without needing special programs b) I can edit it on the fly c) Other people can annotate it if I've missed anything The only risk I've run into so far is wikispam, and a good blocklist + revert functionality clears that up nicely.

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
  244. Palm by mcleaver · · Score: 1

    Palm Desktop works without a Palm and is a great calendar/todo ap. Much sleaker and faster than Outlook. And it's free (I think ;-).

  245. phpToDo by mnordstr · · Score: 1

    What about your 'To Do' List?

    http://php-todo.sourceforge.net/

  246. lotus notes! by qwp · · Score: 1

    Lotus notes is what my little corner of the world uses. It runs perfectly fine.
    Wish it was open source solution, but then again
    it doesn't kill me to pay people once and awhile.
    In all seriousness there should be a open source app that can maigrate with all of these systems.
    Accept outlook/Lotus Notes/ical/etc invitations.
    It is almost like this open software should perhaps set a standard invitation format.
    But hey I stopped writting code now i just watch
    other people pull their hair out.

  247. Emacs PlannerMode and HipsterPDA by zakame · · Score: 1

    When I'm in from of the CRT I use the wonderful PlannerMode for Emacs to keep track of my day. I work on a lot of stuff on a day-to-day basis, so it makes sense to have a planner based on lots of individual day pages, and tasks that are linked to both a particular day page as well as to another page highlighting the task's usefulness to a particular plan. I also have it integrated to my ~/diary so it could show dates marked on my Emacs calendar, allowing me as well to procrastinate important tasks to be done in convenient time. Avoiding missing deadlines is easy, since PlannerMode also allows me to tag tasks with deadlines, so I have tasks that have me really do stuff while another set for actually clearing the deadline. And, as a side effect of PlannerMode being essentially an extension of EmacsWikiMode, I can publish my plans as a wiki (with RSS even ;) that I use as content for my site, allowing people who I work with to know what I'm up to as well. :)

    Now, when I'm not, I use the Hipster PDA. I'm still green using it, but so far, it's great stuff, and I've been using it as my offline PlannerMode.

    You may be asking: where's my {cellphone,PDA,laptop}? Answer: I have none of those, but if you're very generous and willing to give me either of the gadgets above, feel free to drop a mail. :D

  248. NetOffice may do it for you by bterzic · · Score: 1
    I can't say for sure that NetOffice supports everything that you mention, but it's a free, PHP+MySQL based project management app that has at least most of what you mention. All the task properties, the task dependencies and reporting capabilities.

    At work we've been using Mantis (awesome tool) for bug-tracking but we're about to start using NetOffice for Project and Task management, it has a nice bottom up approach (different from something like MS Project) and it's a breeze to set up.

    It's worth checking out.

  249. manual and php by mattr · · Score: 1

    I have an appointment book that fits in my jacket pocket which is the law. Then I also have a 00-NEW folder into which I save emails or jot notes, saved with filenames like "0613-xx-mtg" which I can easily list in an xterm (06* is everything in June). I'm not necessarily happy with this yet. There is also a system I built for appointments (many teachers to many students) which I don't use myself, however it had a phpicalendar viewer to read ical format files, and the ical files were written based on an appointment making web page. I think if someone took on the perl ICal project again and something with perlgtk was made (or an appointment server) it would be quite interesting. I may make a pretty simple version of that for an upcoming app but if someone else knows of an oss server to make appointments between multiple people and share calendars, this is where to post it! When I was making this last year I found Mac OSX had a very nice tool but other os's were not there.

  250. Requisite shouting about Lotus Notes by KingSkippus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, normally I'm not one to shout, but I've got to on this one. First, I respect your opinion, and if Lotus Notes works for you, fantastic. But...

    I work at a really big company, and our e-mail/calendaring application standard is Lotus Notes. It has caused me nothing but immense pain and anguish. I've used and supported both Lotus Notes and Microsoft Exchange, along with their various clients, and I would much rather sell my soul to Bill Gates than use Lotus Notes a single day longer.

    I once composed a document three pages long of nothing but bullet points of complaints about Lotus Notes. The "idiosyncratic" interface has literally cost me days of man-hours of work trying to do the simplest of tasks. I won't post the entire list here, because most of the time it boils down to stupid stuff like the fact that it doesn't use standard Windows interface guidelines that allow everyone in the world to just use it like they use every other business application on their desktop.

    But I'll point out a few that are causes of my most recent irritations. The first thing that you do in Lotus Notes is launch it, and they even frickin' screwed that up. The first thing you see is a huge Lotus Notes splash screen. Lots of applciations have splash screens, so that in itself doesn't bother me. But the goobers who developed this crapplication have decided to force the splash screen to be a topmost window, so while Notes loads all of its cruft, the user is FORCED to sit there and watch a stupid dialog box. You can't Alt-tab over to Word and continue writing a letter, you can't Alt-tab to Firefox and check out the sports scores; no, you have to watch a stupid splash screen.

    How about another? I've been working on throwing together a simple report database where a user can simply compose a new document, fill in some fields, hit a button, and e-mail a report to a list of people. One of the things I would like this form to do is to generate a richtext read-only version of the report in the document, a kind of "preview" feature. The problem is that richtext fields on a form just plain don't work. I've read hundreds of pages of documentation about it, and it all boils down to something like this: "Richtext fields, from a low-level system point of view, do not work like any other field or control in Lotus Notes, so we highly avoid doing anything programmatically with them."

    Or how about one of my favorites? Right now, we're doing the above-mentioned report manually by opening up a stationery item, changing it appropriately, and sending it out. Depending on what all goes on during the day, this report can take a few minutes or a couple of hours to compose. I was writing one of the latter reports when I decided that I really ought to save it in case something happens and I lose the copy I'm working on. That is important: I was making a conscious effort to avoid losing data. So I reach for the Ctrl-S key, which is the Windows standard "save what I'm working on" key, and indeed performs the same function in Lotus Notes. The problem is that although I've hit Ctrl-S a thousand times before, on this particular occasion, I accidentally reached to far and hit Ctrl-E instead. I was prompted with a dialog box that said, "Do you want to send, save, or discard your changes? Choose Cancel to continue editing." Now at this point, I realized that I had hit the wrong key, and frankly, I have no idea what Ctrl-E does, so I chose Cancel to continue editing my document.

    As it turns out, apparently Ctrl-E is the "Lose everything I've been working on without warning me" button, because my report that I had been working on for a couple of hours suddenly vanished and reverted back to the blank template! Cancel and continue editing my ass, who came up with this idiocy!?

    Yes, I've heard a million times about Notes's database capabilities (which are a pale shadow of and much more counterintuitive to use than any real RDBMS out there, even the FOSS ones). Yes, I've heard a

    1. Re:Requisite shouting about Lotus Notes by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      I hate to hurt your feelings, but it seems like you've been making some horrible mistakes with Notes. It sounds like you're trying to fit it into a paradigm you know instead of learing what it really is. I'll address a few of your comments though, but I suspect you've already made up your mind...

      you can't Alt-tab to Firefox and check out the sports scores; no, you have to watch a stupid splash screen.
      I can't say much about this except that on any of the computers I have here, the splash screen is on the screen and gone so quickly it isn't worth alt-tabbing.


      As it turns out, apparently Ctrl-E is the "Lose everything I've been working on without warning me" button.
      I've just tried this and it doesn't do that on any of the forms or fields I'm using. Are you sure it's not something one of your developers has coded in?


      Yes, I've heard a million times about Notes's database capabilities (which are a pale shadow of and much more counterintuitive to use than any real RDBMS out there, even the FOSS ones)
      Notes isn't intended to be a relational database. That's not the point of the program. If you want relational capabilities, Notes will cheerfully link to a proper RDBMS, but if you're trying to use it as one, you're using the wrong tool.


      I'll leave the rest of your rant alone. It's just a piece of software after all, but I think the problems you're having stem from you trying to force the tool to fit what you know instead of learning what the tool is actually for. It's a lot harder to hammer in a screw than a nail, but once you work out what a screwdriver is for...
      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:Requisite shouting about Lotus Notes by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      I've just tried this and it doesn't do that on any of the forms or fields I'm using.

      It doesn't do it in regular e-mails. I was using a stationery template. Honestly, I don't know if this is a built-in Notes feature or something our developers put together, but I'm almost certain that it's a feature of Notes. It's in my Tools folder of my mailbox along with Rules.

      trying to force the tool to fit what you know instead of learning what the tool is actually for

      That's my point--the tool isn't actually good for anything. Even the Notes support and development people I know admit that as an e-mail system, it really sucks compared with other products on the market that are available. I know it's not an RDBMS, which makes it pretty much useless as a database in any sense that databases are used today. It sucks as a RAD tool when you compare its capabilities and ease-of-use to other RAD tools out there. It does Web service, but can't hold a candle to Apache or even (gasp!) IIS, especially when combined with something like OWA. (It's been a while since I've administered Exchange, is it still called Outlook Web Access?)

      Maybe you're right and I'm just not using Lotus Notes for what it was intended. But if that's the case, then can someone please explain what the hell was it intended for? Because to me, it just seems like a mish-mash of substandard stuff thrown together, a jack of all trades and a dismal failure at every one when compared to other products that are cheaper or, in many cases, free, and in all cases easier to use and administer.

      Seriously. In so-called real life, the most vitriolic rants I've ever handed out have been about politics, religion, and Lotus Notes. God, they have been doozies, too.

    3. Re:Requisite shouting about Lotus Notes by morzel · · Score: 1
      I know you were just venting and ranting, but it seemed to me that you're being forced to support something that you don't really know well enough. Training budgets are always the first to get cut... Anyhow, while this'll probably won't change your mind, it may very well help you to scratch some personal itches...
      The first thing you see is a huge Lotus Notes splash screen.
      Lotus notes is started by a little executable stub that does three things: 1) show the splash screen, 2) check for other running notes processes and/or stuff that was left behind by a previous crash to make sure you don't have two concurrent clients running 3) launch the actual notes program.
      Update the program shortcut to use nlnotes.exe instead of notes.exe and you'll immediately skep to number 3, no splash screens required... While this is not a company-wide solution, it may scratch your personal itch.
      One of the things I would like this form to do is to generate a richtext read-only version of the report in the document, a kind of "preview" feature.
      This is definitely not a problem: Lotus Notes Designer is a powerful RAD tool; and as with so many tools it is relatively easy tot get going with it once you get the way Notes works (documents/views/forms/...). Almost everybody can do some basic stuff when they get into it, but there is a whole lot more than just basics that you can do with it that you can't just learn in a couple of weeks/months. Creating a "preview" version of a document you created can be easily accomplished using either LotusScript or Java using the API.
      I have no idea what Ctrl-E does, so I chose Cancel to continue editing my document
      Ctrl-E switches the current document from "read mode" to "edit mode" and vice versa (also see my tough on training budgets). Unless there is specific code for dealing with this within a database/application you'll be always prompted to save your data if you changed anything.
      The problem you had seems to be with the code which is specific for the mail application, where there deal with this in custom code instead of handling the notes client deal with this. If this is the case, you should file a bug report with IBM/Lotus since it is not the way it should work.
      Yes, I've heard a million times about Notes's database capabilities (which are a pale shadow of and much more counterintuitive to use than any real RDBMS out there, even the FOSS ones). Yes, I've heard about Note's replication and security features, which are at best comparable to a properly configured MS Exchange environment.
      First off, Lotus Notes is not an RDBMS and does not claim to be one: it is a document store that happens to have a very good security and replication layer. You should not use it to perform tasks that should be performed by an RDBMS system. Don't try to fit a square peg in a round hole.
      About the replication and security features: this is were Lotus Notes really shines. Saying it is 'comparable' to a properly configured MS Exchange environment does not do it justice, by far. It is one of the very few enterprise "products" for wich security was not just an afterthought but is one of the core parts on which the entire platform is built. Exchange/Outlook doesn't come even close. You should really read up on Notes security if you're in a position to support it.

      I can imagine that you have major gripes with the Lotus Notes UI (it very much sucks in a lot of ways), and the look and feel of the mail application. Consider going to openntf.org (the open source notes site), where they have a different mail template with a UI that should be a lot better if you like MS and/or Outlook.

      The sooner the IT world can kill off Lotus Notes and expunge it from the realm of corporate applications, the better.
      There simply is no competitor for Notes at this point in time. Nothing that comes even close that can do what Notes can do, even with IBM pulling OS/2-style marketing for Lotus.
      --
      Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
      [Zappa]
    4. Re:Requisite shouting about Lotus Notes by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      That's my point--the tool isn't actually good for anything. Even the Notes support and development people I know admit that as an e-mail system, it really sucks compared with other products on the market that are available.

      I suspect a lot of your problems might vanish if you had support & dev people who could explain to you how Notes actually worked.
      It's getting a bit late here (Australia) for me to give you much of a hint, but it might help you if you started thinking of Notes as a distributed document manager rather than an email client. An email is a document which is synchronised (replicated) between two clients.
      Forms are containers for documents (notes). The database capability is not (primarily) intended for the storage and retrieval of individual fields, but of whole documents. If you've followed the debate over WinFS (the metadata filesystem in Longhorn), you can think of the database capabilities in Notes as a way of attaching, storing and retrieving documents using document metadata, and Notes/Domino themselves as an efficient way of distributing those documents.
      Your problem with the RichText field is an example of missing the point. If you just want to distribute information, you can make a html document within Notes, a Word document, a pdf or whatever suits you, put it in a library and the next time users replicate, the information will be available. No need to send it at all.
      Microsoft's closest competitor to Notes is not Outlook, it's Sharepoint/Infopath.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  251. Something about Chandler by pavo · · Score: 1

    The Open Source Applications Foundation is working on a system that goes beyond calendaring, code named Chandler.

    What's Compelling About Chandler: A Current Perspective

  252. Plain text file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For my 'To do' and calendar needs I use a plain text file with a light weight editor (EditPad lite).

    No bloat, no program crashes, no screwy interface.
    Easy to push back my To Do from day to day (just copy/paste), easy to interleave apointments and To dos, etc.

    Format:

    --Sun, June 12, 2:00pm: Apointment, phone#, address
    : To do - buy this buy that ...

    Best of all: I know it's portable forever in the future, to any platform I switch to. It will never be obsolete.

  253. Todo list by punkrockguy318 · · Score: 1

    $vi ~/todo

  254. I need a small multi-user calendar by Aaron32 · · Score: 1

    I have been looking for a good networkable small multi-user calendar. The best I could find is called Active Desktop Calendar. http://www.xemico.com/adc/index.html If anyone has a better suggestion I would be GREATLY appreciative! All I need is for a few people to be able to schedule each other's calendars. I don't want web-based as I want to keep it as simple as possible. Thanks!

  255. evolution by sad_ · · Score: 1

    i use evolution, it also contains an exchange plugin which avoids the need of outlook at work.
    you can have multiple calendars, task lists, export them, it works pretty good.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  256. Re:For OS X: Entourage 2004 by Cuthbert+Calculus · · Score: 1
    I didn't like having to keep 3 apps open at the same time.

    Out of interest why?

    Having tried both approaches, I think can answer that. One of the really nice things about Entourage is that it lets you connect various types of information (calendar events, to-do items, emails, notes, even files on the hard drive) in some really nice ways.

    For example, let's say I get a new client who wants to start a major job with me. In Entourage, I can create a "project" which will allow me to easily combine everything having to do with that job in one place, including any non-Entourage files that may come along. Every email the client and I exchange, every calendar event we've scheduled, all the tasks having to do with the project are linked. I tried this with Mail/iCal/Finder and it just wasn't the same. In fact, I tried it with quite a few software solutions and nothing came close.

    I'm not normally a big fan of MS, but the all-in-one features of Entourage have simplified my job and helped organize my life in a big way.

  257. on the web, LAMP (php), and in my own hands. by acroyear · · Score: 1

    I need to really only share things with my wife, so i've got a web calendar and a to do manager modified (extensively).

    We use my modified ToDo @ work, along with a Wiki, to manage the "little details" of software development, things where our bug management system is overkill. The main mods I added were more states besides "complete" and "not complete" -- we need "planned", "active", "on hold", "at risk", "not doing", "complete", and "on going". In addition, I improved the sorting and layout, added filters and the ability to move items among projects, a "copy" capability, the ability to assign a release, and a way to store the submitter of the item, with cookies to reduce the entry tedium of some of those.

    I love open-source sometimes. I need to subnit my change back to the author to see what he thinks, since he hasn't updated it in a year.

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  258. I use WinDates by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Simple, easy to use, yet it allows for some of the more complex scheduling tasks. http://www.rockinsoftware.com/ It also does not load a bunch of garbage DLLs like Outlook does.

  259. Calendar?? Online?? by xtracto · · Score: 1

    Well, after I have read some comments it seems nobody uses online calendar applications. I find the Yahoo calendar and other MyYahoo services very useful.

    You see, once I started to use the Outlook or other calendars but I find them not very useful as the feature that I use a lot is scheduling.

    When I schedule something I want to have a reminder and, as I do not work on my laptop always, it is nice to have an email sent to me and unless my computer is always turned on I think I can not do it.

    So that is one of the reasons I think online calendar is good.

    Besides, I can also "use it" in every platform, in every place, I can go to a internet cafe if I do not have my computer handy, etc.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  260. You need to have your calender on you... by RoceKiller · · Score: 1

    ...most of the time. So why not just use your cell phone. I do.

    I tried the different calendar software, and syncing with my cell. Some worked somewhat, some didn't. But all was somewhat a mess, so why not just drop the computer.

  261. EssentialPIM by Tekzel · · Score: 1

    I use a little guy called EssentialPIM. http://www.essentialpim.com/ Its a free product, is very small, but only works on windows and isnt open source. Works really well for me.

  262. Re:iCal vs Outlook by SensiMillia · · Score: 1

    One small thing missing in iCal though, and that's the ability to show week numbers. (e.g. week 24 starts monday).
    In fact this microscopic point in the featurelist, makes me use Outlook i.s.o. iCal.

  263. Bugzilla by bbc · · Score: 1

    I use a paper diary and my PDA (which has got an alarm!) for appointments and regularly occuring tasks.

    My todo lists are little pieces of paper that end up in the bin or large sheets that I store so that I have a 'history'.

    For some time now, I have been thinking of employing Bugzilla for tracking tasks though. It is the only program I know that has all the basic functionally for this job, but unfortunately its interface leaves much to be desired.

  264. I made my own todo list by brw12 · · Score: 1
    I wanted a todo list that would:
    • record a priority for each task
    • sort tasks by category and most of all:
    • look at all the tasks' priorities and due dates (and a random factor) and tell me which one I need to be doing right now.

    I keep dozens of items on my todo list at one time, and need them all to come up frequently so that I don't forget them, but don't want to have to look over my whole list every day.

    So I made my own. It's called "Prioritizer" and though it's far from finished, you can install and use it [.zip with php for *nix server with php/mysql support, can be installed on a basic shared hosting account] or try a demo out on the web.

    It should be considered gamma, or delta, or something short of beta. please give me feedback or edit it yourself!

  265. Evolution 2 by bravenight · · Score: 1

    Multiple calendars, color coded merged calendar display, task list with notes, percent completed, etc. etc. We don't have OpenExchange or Groupwise or MS Exchange or such (which Evolution could work with), but I can schedule meetings with other users of Evolution (and Outlook) directly via email, import iCal files, work with LDAP and sync to my palm pilot. The only things Evolution doesn't do that I would really like is to be able to select multiple calendar events based on the category and export the group rather than export one at a time, and an integrated notes component that syncs with my palm.

    1. Re:Evolution 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evolution might be tolerable stand-alone, but speaking as someone who is unfortunate enough to have to use Evolution and the Exchange plug-in on a daily basis at work; I'd say they only work in a Alpha ware only kind of way, i.e. flakey in the extreme and most definitely not enterprise ready, even when running on SuSE 9.3, i.e. on the one distribution where you'd expect it to actually work :-(.

    2. Re:Evolution 2 by Ill_At_Ease · · Score: 1

      I thought that Evolution would be a godsend to me. It wouldn't accept my gmail account settings, crashed a few times and just ate some space.

  266. Re:Outlook 2003 (Cached Exchange Mode) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use Cached Exchange Mode on a shared machine, though. If you have it on, it will expose each person's cache to the next person without requiring a password.

    This may only occur if you're sharing the same local windows account, though.

  267. Free Online Mensa One-A-Day Calendar by base_chakra · · Score: 1

    I'm offering a free Mensa One-A-Day Online Calendar to whomever can make good use of it. Owners of the Mensa One-Day-Day desktop calendars get a free registration for the online version, but I've already got enough electronic calendaring options.

    Email ringbang AT gmail DOT com and I'll send the first respondent the registration code.

    You can either login at pageaday.com, or have the one-a-day mailed to you daily, as illustrated in this sample.

  268. Sharedplan.com has a Linux Project Planner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look here: http://www.sharedplan.com/ It's cross platform for Windows, Mac, and Linux. Not OSS, but it works.

  269. Mozilla Sunbird - Mozilla Lightning by otisg · · Score: 1

    Mozilla Lightning is the future Calendar app from Mozilla:
    http://wiki.mozilla.org/Calendar:Lightning

    Sunbird is, as far as I understand, going to be abandoned.

    --
    Simpy
  270. I remember it all... by Hosiah · · Score: 1
    Sorry, we hard-core programming geeks associate appointment calendar books with Evilly Boring Meetings Featuring Excel Powerpoint Cartoons Of Death, and other suit-related horrors we left behind in our previous corporate lives.

    An efficient person can keep their whole lives notated in the two-inch squares on the wall calendar. Those seeking greater precision can make a simple Bash script-plus-text file suffice. A whole GUI *just* to serve as an upgraded post-it note tends to strike us as silly, as would a whole spread-sheet program just to figure your budget.

    I for one, could care less if I never saw another office application again. They get in the way of doing REAL WORK.

  271. ToDoList by BlizzyMadden · · Score: 1

    There is an open source program called ToDoList that is really good. You can find it at codeproject.com

  272. Memoranda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If java wont bother you, this seems nice.

    http://memoranda.sourceforge.net/

    "Memoranda (formerly known as jNotes2) is an open source cross-platform diary manager and the tool for scheduling personal projects."

  273. Kontact + PDA by Erris · · Score: 1
    KOrgainzer it the calendar for the Kontact PIM. It is a very good calendar on it's own and it's ability for access from ftp or sftp and html export make it easy to share. For the whole nine yards of Personal Information Management, however, you need all of Kontact and device sync.

    The Kontact suite on KDesktop is what's really killer. Sure, it will remind you to do things, but it also delivers on promises that Outlook never kept by actually working together and with devices. The address book has everything Outlook does and LDAP lookup and cryptography and a few other useful things. The mail client is very fast and has two or three forms of file format, none of which is a stupid monolithic database that breaks when it gets too big. The on the fly spell check works without being obtrusive and overbearing. Just right click to get chose the right spelling. Filtering by recipient, sender or list is as easy as right clicking too. The Kontact container brings it all together, where you can check out your RSS feeds, see your most important inboxes mail, who's having a birthday or anniversary, what's next in your todos and what's next in your appointments.

    Syncing all of that between several computers is not too difficult, but Kpilot is easier. Kpilot syncs well with palm. It stuffs most of the information it can into the device. I use a visor and the USB cradle works using the visor kernel module. I've been using unstable, so there have been a few hickups, which mostly result in duplicate entries, but I've never lost data. Someone using Sarge and nothing but Sarge would be very happy with Kontact.

    I've been told by many that Outlook was so buggy and so prone to spy/mal ware attack that the majority of people have turned their backs on PIMs in general. That's too bad. The KDE people have what they wanted and it works now with equipment they already own.

    This page covered by Slashdot on May 28th, has screen shots of Outlook, KDE and Evolution that do a nice job of showing how everything stacks up to Outlook. What it does not show are all the cool extras you get with KDE and how well it works. For that, you need to run it yourself. Spam filtering can be a little slow, but that's as easy to turn on and off as running a wizard and apt-get installing one of four packages.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  274. Dynamic scheduling by startling · · Score: 1


    I'm amazed that the PIM, Above & Beyond, isn't more prevalent. Outlook, Lotus, and all other calendar apps I've seen just ape the original paper diary. Above & Beyond does something much cleverer: enter your To Do list and prioritise it using drag and drop; enter your fixed and recurring appointments; enter your day's start and end times, and it will automatically create your schedule for you (more details of dynamic scheduling at www.1soft.com). This is a great way to accurately predict realistic schedules. Because your Schedule has all your tasks within it, if someone asks you when you next have free time, you can see instantly, unlike the mental calculation required with Outlook-style separate To Do lists and Schedules.

    Instead of just doing what every other calendar app does, why not design something that makes use of what computers do well?

  275. KISS by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1


    To Do list? Depends on the timing:
    * 1 Day - brain
    * 1 Week - Post-Its
    * >1 Week - iCal, which emails me an alert

    Appointments work similarly.

    I move regularly between three computers in different locations, and Apple's free iCal/AddressBook are enough to keep things in order and sync'ed between them. And web access to boot!

    That's good enough for us scientists, but may not be enough for everybody.

  276. Expresso by BloodAngel_Au · · Score: 1

    For my own use, I don't need anything connected to anything else, so I use a 11 year old copy of Expresso by Berkley Systems (Yes, the After Dark guys), as it has a calander with various views, a to-do list and a names and numbers list, with an alarm facility, and the best bit is when you close it it 'snapshots' itself into a background bitmap, so I can see it all day, when I don't have anything open.

    It has themes, and does everything I want, using about 3 Mb ram. I wonder if it was ever updated, or newer versions released. My says C 93 - 94.

  277. iCal by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    There is no good open-source calendaring. Do what all the other sane *nix nerds are doing and switch to OS X.

  278. Plans by YoungHack · · Score: 1

    I have pretty modest requirements, but still found a lot of solutions lacking. At the moment, I am pretty happily using Plans (http://www.planscalendar.com/).

    For ToDo functions, I use TDL (http://www.rpcurnow.force9.co.uk/tdl/)

  279. Try the open source ToDo List by Bootard · · Score: 1

    I saw someone else mentioned TODO list. It's free and doesn't have much advanced functionality, but it my all time favorite program of its type and have to say I imagine it works perfectly for 95% of features. For anyone looking for a todo list type program, or if you are looking for something a lot simpler and more functional, lots of people will back me up on this...

    http://www.abstractspoon.com/tdl_resources.html
    http://www.codeproject.com/tools/ToDoList2.asp

    --
    exceptio probat regulam in casibus non exceptis
  280. Re:Outlook 2003 - Stop the FUD. by mdecarle · · Score: 1

    This is what people fail to understand. I have the feeling -it can't be real, I know- that Outlook is better with very large mailboxes.

    It's crazy, I know, but Outlook feels bloated and slow when the mailbox is empty. On the contraire, it feels light and powerful when the mailbox is huge.

    How did they do this?

  281. Palm - syncs both ends by midgley · · Score: 1

    The Tungsten T5 syncs to the family Palm desktop diary etc at home, on an Apple Mac Mini, and to teh a Windows 2000 machine on the front desk at work. I'd as soon sync it to one of the Linux boxes at each end, but have not currently found something simple and easy and good enough to be worth the change.

  282. Anybody using Hula? by Eater · · Score: 1

    Hula seems to have a lot of killer-calendar potential but probably has a little ways to go. I installed it yesterday and I'm starting to play around with it. Any positive/negative experiences?

  283. Re:For OS X: Entourage 2004 by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

    Okay, now I understand. I wonder how Spotlight affects that? Or smart folders? May be now you can do what you want to do using the distinct applications. Not that I'm saying change because I always feel you should use the best tool for the job and if Entourage suits you then great.

  284. Re:Outlook 2003 (Cached Exchange Mode) by swmccracken · · Score: 1

    I guess you're right - but then, there are a number of advantages to not using the same windows account for multiple people!

    (In Exchange, you have to create user accounts in Active Directory for each mailbox anyway, so this is usually not a big problem.)

  285. Re:For OS X: Entourage 2004 by turbidostato · · Score: 1

    "Having one "Monolithic" application for email/calendar is rather nice to have"

    And yet, having the ability to choose if you prefer having a big monolithic app, or a few bunch of apps you can open and close at leisure is probably better.

    And that's what KDE's PIM package gives to you: you can either use the "monolithic" Kontact "shell" or you can open separatly the e-mail app, the news one, the Calendar, etc.

    "...and Outlook is really the only good program at communicating with an Exchange server"

    And that's probably a very big reason NOT to use Exchange. I thought we all learnt about how evil vendor locking was back in the 70's-80's.

  286. OBM has a great multi-user calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with Evolution and Outlook connectors soon here.
    http://obm.aliacom.fr/

  287. Nokia 8600 by vettemph · · Score: 1

    I put everything in that little querty keyboard cell phone. I also syncronize with Lotus Notes at work via nokia tools. I've been doing this successfully for about a year.
    Calandar
    ToDo (three proirity levels)
    Reminder
    Meetings...

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  288. Re:For OS X: Entourage 2004 by Bake · · Score: 1

    Ahem ....
    This page says that you can sync everything with the Exchange server pretty much everything that Outlook can.

    Or does that apply only to Exchange versions after 5.5?

  289. use case website by elhedran · · Score: 1

    I know its a bit late in the discussion for this to be seen, so I might post it again as an ask slashdot.

    One of the best ways to improve the usability and functionality of software is with good use cases. These are just the 'I want to achieve X' that people already post in slashdot articles like this.

    Rather than loosing this info, why not have a website that tracks and ranks use cases (100,000 people want to be able to share their calendars, for instance). This would be a very useful resource for both open source and commercial software. Admittedly probably more useful to commercial software though as open source is more written to scratch the itch of the developer.

  290. MeetingMaker by bolix · · Score: 1

    Check out MeetingMaker. Runs on Linux on the server and clientside.

  291. whatever... by circusboy · · Score: 1

    My point was intended to be that the problem with groupware in general is that it requires a central server. That is a problem with the system, not the individual implementation.

    I was sort of trying to imply that a groupware system that used the group itself as the repository for the group information would be preferable to a system that relies on connection to a dedicated server alá exchange.

    Wasn't there a ximian exchange client? what happened there? Ah, I see it's novell now... from their adcopy it seems that you can access exchange from 'Evolution,' I suppose its support is limited though?

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    1. Re:whatever... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      When you are talking about managed IT, central servers are good, information spreaded an unmanaged over a lot of clients is bad. Having groupware servers is good, using them propietary protocols and formats is bad.

      Still, this doesn't mean clients can't cache relevant information so you don't have to go to the server for every little operation, provided it is developed properly. Servers like Kollab can use disconnected IMAP for this, for instance.

      "Wasn't there a ximian exchange client?"

      But you are still using a proprietary server with proprietary patent-encumbered comunication protocols. Noone apart from Microsoft can insure proper functionality (not that Microsoft will insure it, but that's a different issue). Vendor locking is bad.

  292. Check out... by mpath · · Score: 1

    Rainlender. Small, compact, configurable, and has some synchronization stuff, too.

    --
    I'm not sure what the secret to success is, but the secret to failure lies in trying to please everyone -Bill Cosby
  293. Help Out! by TheLoneGundam · · Score: 1

    Support the Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium: www.calconnect.org

    Become an individual member, or get your company / university to join (especially if you are MS or Palm, two companies conspicuously absent).

    This group is working on the calendar interoperability issue.. individual calendaring (as, I think, requested by the original poster) is one thing, but to be really effective you need to be able to work with others' calendars too.

  294. backpackit.com and online calendar by burdalane · · Score: 1

    I use BackpackIt to make to-do lists. At home I use a program called Paraben Daily Organizer for reminders. Recently I've started using the online calendar provided by my ISP as part of its webmail service. My ISP's calendar and BackpackIt are quite handy because I can access them from any computer on the Internet.

  295. ASCII text files by AndyCanfield · · Score: 1

    Over the past 25 years I've tried a few 'calendar 'and 'todo' tools and always come back to: ASCII text files.

    Calendar? Lines of ASCII text, mm/dd+[TAB]+description. Sorts nicely, just look at the top, can see everything. When an annual event is finished, move it to the bottom of the list for next year.

    ToDo list? Ascii text again. Important things move to the top of the list. Less important stuff disappears off the bottom of the window and never gets done.

    Sometimes I share the same calendar or todo file between Windows and Linux. I can edit it over the local network.

    Portable, personal, customized, universal. Virtually the same user interface as in 1980.

  296. Active Desktop Calendar by remhx · · Score: 1

    ADC http://www.xemico.com/adc/index.html has it all. It's in-your-face on your desktop, interactive from the desktop, and uses notes and todo lists. It's highly configurable and shareable on a network. you can create note classes: birthday's, sport schedules, department, etc and assign them as private or public. No, it's not open source. This was the first downloadable software I ever purchased and it's been worth the price. Limited version is free to try. Runs on win98&up. Ron in Atlanta http://conyersportal.com/

  297. Getting feedback for OSS... by thetwatinthehat · · Score: 0
    unfortunately for them and the developers, the reality for most users is
    • recommended to try out a foss alternative to something
    • if it exists, and is easy to find, download the installer. If not, don't bother and go back to working
    • try to install, if it's easy, complete the process. If not, give up and go back to working
    • try the software
    • either : software does everything they want it to, carry on.
    • or : software fails to meet their needs/expectations. Uninstall/give up and go back to working
    If they're trying to be productive, they don't tend to have the time to work out what's wrong. Most don't know that they need to file bugs/features, and those that do may not have the time/motivation to find out how to.

    Where there's money involved, the producer has the possibility of having the time, motivation and resources to go and gather a bunch of such people, get them to try this process and provide feedback. Many deride the idea of focus groups and consumer sessions, but that's how most producers hear about improvements that actually mean something to the user.

    Until a producer starts to go out of their way to find out the issues users have with their software, they won't have the full picture. The user is not there to service your need, they are there to make productive use of software (or unproductive in the case of games). To expect (note, I don't say "do" here, as I know you may not have time/resource) otherwise is to exhibit a lack of understanding of your target, which will never give you world domination.

    I know, I know, you're not in it for that, you're just trying to make the best software you can because you enjoy doing it. An admirable thing to do, far be it from me to say anything else. If that's the case, then please do not complain that the user isn't doing what you want them to do. Take some time out of coding and look at what else is needed. If that means downing your tools and approaching users, so be it.

    1. Re:Getting feedback for OSS... by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Suggestion, I've seen a few softwares offer a feedback form as part of the uninstaller.. just a thought.. :)

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  298. Agreed, korganizer is probably the best available by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Yes, KOrganizer is at LEAST as featureful as iCal was last time I looked, and it's much easier to use. It integrates very well with the rest of KDE, and links to KArm for tracking working times. The built-in project timelines (gannt charts) are pretty useful too.

  299. Apple Calendar gets this right too by real+gumby · · Score: 1

    You can set your standard timezone and then make appointments at the time "scheduled" which it gets right.

  300. This whole thread sounds fishy by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1
    Is it just me, or are all the "Outlook lovers" those Slashdot users with an ID greater than 500000, and all of the rest of us with an UID less than 500000 are either OK with it, or don't like it, or have actually used something else? Seems to me like this whole thread is getting swamped with "ooh, and you just can't beat Feature Set XYZ in Outlook 2003! I mean, ever since Outlook 2003 came out I just can't live without Outlook 2003!" Please! I've used Outlook before, and as others have pointed out -> it's just as non-intuitive with it's many "features" and menus hidden all over the place as any other Microsoft product. Hearing all these "Outlook 2003 rocks!" plugs makes most of these comments look like they're coming straight out of Redmond from a bunch of semi-employed corporate Microsoft schills posting from their local Starbucks.

    Personally, I've found that the PalmOS calendaring system is the best in terms of ease of use, logical setup of options, and ability to keep yourself on track with meetings, appt's, all day events, etc. No, I don't fly overseas. No, I don't work with other people from different time zones very often. So PalmOS fits my bill. I also am forced to use Lotus Notes at work. I hate it, but mainly because out of all our systems it seems to have the most problems. And the many menus and scheduling ways of doing things just suck. Not easy to use at all. We're NOT allowed to even use Outlook in any of its many incarnations, but if we did I'm sure I'd be ripping my hair out even more than I currently am with Lotus Notes based on my personal experience at home with Outlook. And YES, I work in a medium-sized company with very qualified server admins who know what they're doing when they set up an email server. My frustrations with Outlook would certainly stem from the crazy ways in which Microsoft likes to set up their toolbar menus and the handling of something as simple as writing a quick email message. No, don't move the bullet point over there! No, I don't want it in HTML format! No, I don't want XYZ to happen, quit asking me!!

  301. Calendar Preference by Merl3 · · Score: 1
    Although it sounds pedestrian, my law office uses Apple's free iCal program in its latest 10.4.1 quite successfully. It's not bloatware. But then, lawyers and their staffs are such IT nightmares that for any programming they touch "Simple is best."

    We're a team-based business litigation botique that does business lit legal malpractice defense work, board-of-directors defense, etc. generally on referrral from other lawyers or insurance companies. Everything is time-critical; careful back-calendaring and team coordination is essential.

    We tried a dedicated law office management program that was expensive, slow, and inaccurate on critical drop-dead dates set by local federal and State court rules. We used Office X/Entourage as well for awhile but didn't care for the costly upgrade to Office 2004 or the MS syncronization feature.

    Apple's syncronization keeps everyone on the same page (literally), syncs our bluetooth Motorola cell phones' calendar and contacts functions, and operates in the background while we work. Hardware appears bullet-proof and the OS lawyer-proof. We get off-site backup and restore functions with our firm's dotMac account, a reassuring feature when "Leaping Lawyers with Laptops" data-loss issues are omnipresent.

    There may be bloatware answers to calendaring. But for our money, iCal, iSync and dotMac have them all skunked!

  302. Act! by aquarian · · Score: 1

    I've been using Act since the beginning of time. It's the closest thing to a paper calendar, but does everything Outlook does and more, with a much more intuitive user interface.

    The problem with most of these apps, and especially open source ones, is that they all assume the same, very narrow workplace/workflow model -- someone who works mostly by themselves but has meetings occasionally, works for a medium to large company, and all their correspondence via email. These apps are not suitable for a consultant or someone running a business. They don't keep track of written correspondence or phone calls, or they don't do it well. They don't integrate with accounting software, etc. Act, Goldmine, and a few other old school players do.

    I've been on a quest to find the ultimate PIM for 15 years. After trying everything else I could find, Act has always won out. For a smaller, lighter app I always liked Starfish, which I don't think is around anymore.

  303. It depends.. by tbuskey · · Score: 1
    Shared calendars

    At work, when I need to coordinate with others for meetings, etc, Exchange + Outlook works. I've used Notes in the past also. It's not as good. I've also used MeetingMaker. Also not as good.

    It also syncs with my Blackberry and my Palm. The BB can sync on the road.

    Home calendar

    palm, synced to as much as possible. Yahoo calendar so my wife can see my schedule. jpilot on the desktop. Outlook at work. Yes, I mix home/work appointments.

    Shared calendaring is different from personal calendaring. Syncing can help bridge the gap. I use the palm for when I don't have a real computer. It lets me carry a chunk & add to it when I get back. The BB does too.

    Most of the FOSS I've looked at doesn't address shared calendaring. For me that means palm syncing and PC user access. I've played with Plan, Solaris CM (Ok, SunOS era). They didn't cut it.

  304. No life either by lilmouse · · Score: 1

    And he has no life!

    --LWM