Slashdot Mirror


Combating Harassing Use of Mosquito Noise Device?

amicold asks: "For a while now my neighborhood has had to deal with an elderly neighbor who has displayed a slightly paranoid attitude towards myself and the fellow younger-adults of the neighborhood, believing us to be attempting to harass him in our day-to-day activities. Recently, he installed a Mosquito ultrasonic noise device as an apparent attempt to 'get back at us' for our harassment. As the Mosquito emits a sound that's well out of his hearing range, he can't hear it, while most of the rest of the neighborhood is under 40 and can; at which point it's causing everyone a great deal of discomfort. Unfortunately, because the police also can't hear it, we can't get the authorities to do anything about it, leaving us empty-handed in our attempts at getting some peace and quiet back. What can we do to either help the police realize how disturbing this device is, or counteract it so that it's no longer disturbing us? And is this the first of what may be a growing trend of civilians using high-tech discomfort weapons as a method of neighborhood warfare?"

1,059 comments

  1. right back at them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:right back at them by jpardey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bwoom Bwoom Bwoom Bwoom Bwoom Bwoom Bwoom Bwoom..... That would be some killer kick.

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
    2. Re:right back at them by morethanapapercert · · Score: 2, Funny

      or better still, the loudest noisemaker I've ever heard of... http://www.victorysiren.com/x/index.html A noisemaker so loud it apparently starts fires! 138Db 100' from the unit!

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    3. Re:right back at them by JamesKelley · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would just sneak over his fence and physically disable the componet that makes the noise. He won't know it is broken, and you can just act like it is still working. That way he will be happy and so will you.

    4. Re:right back at them by letxa2000 · · Score: 0
      I'm wondering... did this old guy really deploy the device to annoy the neighbors or to annoy mosquitos? If the guy can't hear it, do you really think he even knows other people can? What, did he hop on to how-old-folks-can-annoy-young-neighbors.com and realize that the mosquito device will emit noise that will bother everyone but that he is too deaf to hear?


      Did you think of maybe knocking on his door and politely mentioning that the device makes constant noise? Maybe he doesn't even know it!


    5. Re:right back at them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Click the link in the post, it isn't a mosquito deterent, it is made specificly to annoy young people that can hear it.

    6. Re:right back at them by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

      Heck. . . I'd just buy me any one of these contraptions from Daisy.

      --

      YOU'RE WINNER !
      Another lame blog

  2. Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could start by getting off his damn lawn.

    1. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no shit - you've been pownd by an old man.

    2. Re:Well, you could start by... by mcrbids · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, but once you are off the damned lawn, then what?

      I'd suggest that taking a look at a book that takes the subject seriously.

      When somebody "gets one over" on you, there are a bazillion ways to fight back. This is a funny, insightful, and comprehensive explanation of just how many options you really have.

      It's amazing what you can do with a $0.99 bottle of super-glue! (Hint - a drop or two in each keyhole of his car door locks can be very entertaining)

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    3. Re:Well, you could start by... by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's amazing what you can do with a $0.99 bottle of super-glue!

      Yeah, like getting yourself tossed in jail for vandalizing other people's property! Woo, hoo!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Well, you could start by... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What, "destruction of property" is a valid "option"?

      I guess if you're completely amoral and sociopathic...

    5. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or use roundup on that lawn. I once attempted to spell out "JACKASS" across about 30x10 feet of someones front yard with round up. The idea was good but the implementation needed more oversight from someone that was not drinking heavily. The round up killed all of the grass exactly where we put it but apparently our placement of the letters was too close together. If you studied the final product after the roundup did its job, it looked more like random lines with only the SS part actually looking like real letters. I also spilled about a 1/2 gallon in my own yard when I was trying to screw the pump on the sprayer which left a huge spot as well.

    6. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You could fight back in two ways

      Use 2 directional low frequency drivers pointed at his house that would cause him to have a bowel movement.

      "Strong infrasonic or ultrasonic sound waves passing through the head, neck, or chest can cause gasping for breath, head pains, or a choking effect. The firing point of the weapon could be from inside of the house next door or the inside of the house across the street. Since the weapon is hidden inside of a house and no damage is done to either house, it is virtually impossible to visually detect it. The wave after striking its target and passing through the targeted house will dissipate in the atmosphere over a distance. This is truly a vanishing bullet. "

      Use 2 different directional high frequency (ultra sound) drivers pointed at his house from two different places but focused at his mosquito device. One at 38kHz the other at 40kHz. Where the two wave fronts meet there will be a loud interference tone of 2kHz.

      This is the system used in the Yahama Sound Stage.

    7. Re:Well, you could start by... by realkiwi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      1. start harrassing him just so that he gets his value scale right
      2. throw a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov_cocktail Molotov cocktail through his living room window...
      3. do drive by paintball shootings...

      --
      realkiwi
    8. Re:Well, you could start by... by westlake · · Score: 1
      You could start by getting off his damn lawn.

      My first thoughts exactly.

      There is something darkly amusing about the techno-Geek who misquotes Gandhi at every opportunity, but whose gut instinct is slash-and-burn, to immeadiately take sny real-life conflict to the next level.

    9. Re:Well, you could start by... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 4, Informative

      What would you call it if the neighbor was deaf and so could play loud music audible to everyone else, 24/7? People wouldn't be able to open a window without hearing it. Maybe even with the windows shut it's still audible inside the house. It's not destruction of property, but it's at least as vile.

    10. Re:Well, you could start by... by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Step 1: Make sure he doesn't have a pacemaker.
      Step 2: Take your Microwave Oven apart.
      Step 3: Using the existing waveguides as an example, fashion one that will fit on the feed horn of the Magnetron that is about 3'/1m long; it will need to be metal and the surfaces will need to be as close to flat as possible.
      Step 4: set it up at the edge of your property closest to the Mosquito device, with the outlet of the wave guide pointing directly at the device.
      Step 5: Knock on your neighbors door and Politely inform them they are disturbing your peace within your home, and that you will sue them if they do not desist.
      Step 6:???
      Step 7: Profit?

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    11. Re:Well, you could start by... by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Well, if you want to cause damage, yes...

      ...but ketchup smeared under the car door handles is just as funny. :)

    12. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't know how to write it you'll only embarass by taking it this public.

    13. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [ot] /b/ tards... they're everywhere! [/ot]

      Did anyone try to tell the police it's a hi-tech harassment device, which sound can only be heard by young people?

    14. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Getting off the guy's lawn is actually very good advice, considering the noise emitter only has a 15-20 metre range...

    15. Re:Well, you could start by... by Elemenope · · Score: 1

      Yes, someone told this cop, who learned everything he ever knew about high-tech devices and ultrasonics from Star Trek TOS (if you're lucky) that the Neighborhood's Old Man has a 'super duper high tech magically audible only to people the cop doesn't like anyway device', and due to this explanation, everything worked out OK.

      Or maybe, in the real world, we all have to deal with authority figures who don't know and don't care about reality whatsoever, find harassing youth darkly amusing (if not their own favorite past-time), and couldn't be bothered to act even if none of the above were accurate.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    16. Re:Well, you could start by... by fuzzix · · Score: 1
      ...but ketchup smeared under the car door handles is just as funny. :)

      D. M. S. O.
      Crypto Wonder Drug
      In vogue
      Some people say
      It cures arthritis
      Maybe that's why
      It keeps getting banned
      It's absorbed
      Directly through the skin
      Mix it with lemon juice
      Touch your fingertips
      You'll taste the lemon
      The police
      Started a riot
      Down at the courthouse
      Again
      Running amok
      Spilling blood
      Bashing heads
      I do my part
      Behind the lines
      Swabbing door handles of cop cars
      With D.M.S.O.
      Mixed with L.S.D.....

      - Jello Biafra (No matter what the rest of Dead Kennedys say)
    17. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed - my first reaction to this is WTF?! It's a shame that we live in such a paranoid society where everybody thinks their neighbor is "out to get them" and that somehow that justifies an escalating spiral of "revenge" tactics. Life is too f'king short..you all should learn to relax more.

      Did you ever consider that maybe because he can't HEAR it he doesn't know there is a problem? Can you talk to him about it calmly and respectfully, or have you already become such bitter rivals that you would/could never do that..

      Like WTF would putting glue in the door locks accomplish? Nothing..because if you are smart you wouldn't get caught..and he wouldn't have a CLUE that the reason you did it was because of the "ultrasonic jammer". He would just get more irrate and do something MORE irritating. MATURE adults try to talk out their problems..assuming that you aren't living in redneck-city or something.

      Signed Sincerely,
      Your local naive anonymous coward.

    18. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When somebody "gets one over" on you, there are a bazillion ways to fight back.

      Fantastic. The guy is doing this because he thinks he's being persecuted, so you suggest... persecuting him? That won't escalate matters at all, will it?

    19. Re:Well, you could start by... by The+Snowman · · Score: 1
      Use 2 directional low frequency drivers pointed at his house that would cause him to have a bowel movement.

      That is bullshit. Mythbusters busted that one a while ago, and unlike some of their attempts, I think they did a fairly thorough job with it. Adam did feel very uncomfortable at times, but nothing approaching pain or a bowel movement.

      The rest of your post is great, however. Finding tones that interfere with each other in a range that is clealy audible to anyone with hearing, even old people who can't hear up around 20 KHz, is a great idea. It won't cause any damage, and probably won't escalate the situation.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    20. Re:Well, you could start by... by c1ay · · Score: 1

      Using RoundUp is destructive though and leaves you vulnerable to litigation for causing property damage. Instead one should use seed like seed for crabgrass to spell out such messages. It is non-destructive and once the seed roots the message will last much longer :)

      --

    21. Re:Well, you could start by... by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      MATURE adults try to talk out their problems.

      If he were a mature adult he wouldn't have a problem because he couldn't hear it!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    22. Re:Well, you could start by... by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the sound is inaudible to the majority of people over 25 while the original post says it's annoying everyone under 40. The exaggeration of facts doesn't make me any more confident that the original poster is as innocent as he pretends to be.

      --
      I love my sig.
    23. Re:Well, you could start by... by speederaser · · Score: 5, Informative

      "...maybe because he can't HEAR it he doesn't know there is a problem?"

      According to the products page, the purpose of the Mosquito is to drive teenagers away from an area by producing high frequency sound only they can hear. Older people cannot hear it. The device has no other purpose, and is certainly not a mosquito repellent device as some posters have assumed.

    24. Re:Well, you could start by... by NoTheory · · Score: 4, Insightful

      25 and 40 are both artificial cutoffs. This isn't a case of exaggeration, it's a use of inherently flawed statistics. If you take care of your hearing, and are genetically well endowed, it may be the case you can here these things your whole life. The ability to hear these things are a function of aural capability, not age.

      --
      There are lives at stake here!
    25. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree physical retaliation is not wise -- and might be EXACTLY what the bitter old coot is trying for.

      Personally, I think he needs to get a lawyer and prod the police into doing their job.

      The guy is a nuisance at best, and worst he might be trying to provoke a confrontation.
      It wouldn't be the first time someone used their property as a base to harass someone else, then shot them in defence when they entered their property.
      It's a classic "who me? me innocent" defense.

    26. Re:Well, you could start by... by AxemRed · · Score: 1

      I don't think that I would destroy any old property, but it wouldn't be completely out of line to destroy the mosquito would it?

    27. Re:Well, you could start by... by Rauser · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, or you could just get older--it's working for me :(

      --
      The white zone is for loading and unloading only. If you need to load or unload go to the white zone. It's a way of life
    28. Re:Well, you could start by... by lucerin · · Score: 1

      it's really not destruction of property, it's merely adding some extra protection

    29. Re:Well, you could start by... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Well, actually thebones in your ears continue to grow, so the threshold of your hearing well decrease as you get older, but depending on how well your blessed in the genetics, and how little damaged your hearing is, you can easily hear the high frequncy range to a very old age.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    30. Re:Well, you could start by... by MacroMegaMan · · Score: 1

      I can hear them, and I'm 34....
      I guess I'm just young at heart! :)

    31. Re:Well, you could start by... by Cromac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe, but we don't know his side of the story either. From the summary "For a while now my neighborhood has had to deal with an elderly neighbor who has displayed a slightly paranoid attitude towards myself and the fellow younger-adults of the neighborhood, believing us to be attempting to harass him in our day-to-day activities.", that's just the kids point of view, maybe their idea of harmless day-to-day activities involves cruising up and down the block blasting (c)rap music and the old man and the rest of the neighborhood has had enough and that's the reason no one has asked him to stop.

    32. Re:Well, you could start by... by drsquare · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Yeah, like getting yourself tossed in jail for vandalizing other people's property! Woo, hoo!
      How can you be tossed in jail when no-one knows who did it?

      Around these parts, if some old fuck pissed everyone off with a mosquito device, he'd just get put in hospital.
    33. Re:Well, you could start by... by gutnor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why destroying the car ? I doesn't help with your problem.

      Beter try to
      1. Talk the guy out of this
      2. Just destroy the moskito repeler in a fashion that is not apparent to the owner. After all if he doesn't hear it, you just have to take the first opportunity, open the box, and cut the alimentation to the speaker. Your problem is solve. The owner is happy because the nice blue led tells him that the device is working. And after all, if the guy is really paranoid, teens are not *really* invading his property, so he will never realise that the device is not actually working ( like garlic neclace to repel vampire )

      Off course if the guy has a real reason because your kids (neighbourhood kids) are drinking in his lawn every night, you have to solve that problem first. In that case, if you destroy the mosquito before, you can be certain the owner will call the police and unlike the sound, they will be able to see that you detroyed you neighbour property.

    34. Re:Well, you could start by... by numbski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      amoral, perhaps. However, consider this attitude as well:

      It's only wrong if you get caught. ;)

      (I don't actually buy into that attitude, but humor me for a moment.)

      Consider for a moment what the poster said - it's well out of his hearing range. So...2 am, wear earplugs. Go over to the unit, if you can, simply short one of the wires running to the speakers. If that's unreasonable, a few drops of super-glue down into the cone of the unit might just do the trick.

      The power light still comes on, the old man feels more safe, and the rest of the neighborhood has peace. Win-win.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    35. Re:Well, you could start by... by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      In my town all is fair game from 7 am until 9 pm. Therefore any neighbor who causes me grief can be subjected to my learning a new musical instrument. The trombone, the euphonium and the trumpet all have their glories when it comes to sounds that carry well. The tuba also works rather well. So buy a condo and the first time someone really irritates you simply start learning a new instrument. As long as you stay within the legal hours for making noise they have no choice but to grin and try to bear it. And keep in mind that there are lots and lots of unusual musical scales that don't occur in common music. A five tone scale can really educate your neighbors after you get it right by playing it a couple of hours a day for a month or so.

    36. Re:Well, you could start by... by Fishead · · Score: 1

      Fertilizer works good too. Someone in my highschool class wrote an interesting message about the vice principle in the school field. Because the field was downhill from the school, the amusing message was quite visible. Very funny, and not destructive. Crabgrass would be fun as well.

    37. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaaahh...Now the war makes sense.

    38. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thinking, and of course, once you've mastered a particular scale in all keys, you can move on to all of its modes in all keys. I especially like the modes of the ascending melodic minor. Whole tone and diminished rock as well. Then you can get crazy and construct 5-tone scales out of any of the other ones. Just be sure your neighbors don't call homeland security because they think you are some kind of foreigner.

    39. Re:Well, you could start by... by AdamWeeden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the spirit! It's only illegal if you get caught!

      Remember: two wrongs don't make a right.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    40. Re:Well, you could start by... by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      "What he doesn't know can't hurt him"

      Isn't that another of those amoral morals of life?

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    41. Re:Well, you could start by... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      I am "old age" and I can still determine whether a CRT or TV is on without looking. These devices emit a very high frequent sound when powered on.

      Now is the mosquito frequency below or above that of CRT devices?

    42. Re:Well, you could start by... by nsayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but three rights make a left.

    43. Re:Well, you could start by... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      That's not true. Obviously the actual age when you lose hearing at that frequency will vary. But no one is going to retain hearing of that frequency into middle age. Either this isn't a genuine mosquito device, or the submitter is lying about the 40 year olds.

    44. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use 2 directional low frequency drivers pointed at his house

      When you are dealing with such low frequencies like your vibrator idea, I think it would be impossible to make that directional. Maybe I misunderstand but I thought that the lower the frequency, the less uni directionally it propagated. That is a property of the wave, not something alterting a source making the wave can overcome. Maybe some noise cancelling would work and why you suggest using 2 of them. You can compensate for higher frequencies that tend to be more directional by installing transmitters at different angles or by using different antennea designs but not the other way around. Good luck transmitting 5-15hz over an antennea.

    45. Re:Well, you could start by... by rk · · Score: 1

      And to put more anecdotal evidence on the table: My 36-year-old wife is actually rather hard-of-hearing in most of the frequencies that human (especially male) voices occurs in (enough to have hearing aids and for us to communicate in ASL sometimes), but she actually has freakishly good hearing in the upper registers. Something like that blasting at 20kHz near us would put her in permanent migraine state.

      If it were me, I would have no compunction about disabling this device. If it's wrong or amoral for me to defend my wife from a neighbor's continued assault when the police won't do anything, then I'm not terribly interested in being right or moral.

    46. Re:Well, you could start by... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Which is cute...but is LSD even soluble in DMSO? Dissolving it in water will hydrolyse it after a very short period of time (which is what makes the threat of throwing it in a reservoir so funny...to hear).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    47. Re:Well, you could start by... by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      Mine too. Maybe I shouldn't be, but I'm a little surprised by how few people here are actually willing to believe that the neighbor might have a valid complaint. I don't know the nature of the situation, but it's disturbing how readily people are willing to cast the neighbor as the villain. Maybe he just needs to be able to sleep.

    48. Re:Well, you could start by... by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      Better put some of the super-glue (or PUR foam) in the Mosquito (little night expedition required here :-). The good thing is that the old guy can not hear himself if the Mosquito works or not!!

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    49. Re:Well, you could start by... by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      according to the FAQs
      "The effective range is between 15 and 20 metres. " = That's 65 feet

      That's a pretty long distance in the majority of US neighborhoods.

      From reading the website and the $937 price (UK£ 495) it's pretty obvious it's not designed for individuals looking to annoy your neighbors. It does effect your neighbors rather than just their children since the page says "the majority of people over the age of 25, have lost the ability to hear at this frequency range" so if you have any neighbors under 25 you're bugging the crap out of them.

      I think I'd contact the website and explain to them that you're a early 20s home owner and your elderly neighbor is trying to run you out of your house. I'd also print out the webpage and show it to the police, maybe you just need to have a younger police officer come out to the house?

      While searching information on the Mosquito I found this interesting: teenagers are actually using it as a ringtone in schools because teachers can't hear it.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    50. Re:Well, you could start by... by numbski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup. I've learned over time however that hard and fast rules have rarely won over anyone for anything. Compassion for the needs of others and a desire to do right will however often win out. It sounds to me as though the person has taken every reasonable recourse, and if he has in fact approached the neighbor directly with a kind disposition and that has failed, has approached law enforcement, and that has failed, a mild bending of the rules and a "what he doesn't know won't hurt him" attitude probably isn't the worst approach.

      Bash me if you like, but unless you can suggest a better course of action than "return fire!", I would appreciate a bit more levity. I'm not heartless here.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    51. Re:Well, you could start by... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You could simply wait till the old goat is a asleep then jerk the god damn thing off the wall. Then giving it three hard wacks with a bat should do it. Since the fucker costs a 1000 bucks the old goat wouldn't be in a hurry to buy another one. Since the old fart is paranoid you might want to dress in all black and wear a hood on your mission. Think ninja. He might have security cameras up.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    52. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the piezo wafer is positioned directly behind the opening of the (tweeter) horn. I'd bet a prolonged burst from one of the bigger models from http://www.wickedlasers.com/ would crack/fuse the transducer. It would be simple to shield from such attacks, but the model picutred at http://www.compoundsecurity.co.uk/teenage_control_ products.html seems to have no such shielding.

      oh, and make sure to wear goggles. Those things are VERY VERY bright.

      Could be as effective as a .22 round applied in the same manor, but significantly less likely to get you thrown in prison.

    53. Re:Well, you could start by... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      and the rest of the neighborhood has peace. Win-win.

      Until the *real* mosquitos come. Not your ordinary everyday average garden variety mosquitos. No, these come from across the border; you'll know from the telltale tattoos and fondness for imported cigarettes. And the accent, man! The accent!

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    54. Re:Well, you could start by... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      ...take up the bagpipes...

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    55. Re:Well, you could start by... by db32 · · Score: 1

      Amazing little quote you have there. Taken almost verbatim from one of the UltraSonics conspiracy sites. This is the exact description of the weapon the "UltraSonics" Secret Police group uses to harras its "Targets"
      Here is one of many copies of this drivel.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    56. Re:Well, you could start by... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      this site has a 19khz and 17khz 3-second clip. The 17 is very easy to hear and would chase me off after awhile and I'm going on 30. I can't hear the 19khz at all, guess I don't have to buy those headphones that go up to 22khz anymore ;)

      The really scary thing is anyone who can't hear these frequencies could crank this and play 24/7 for free with only a PC and speakers, no need to spend $1,000 for that device. They'd have to play it through their windows since these frequencies don't travel well through walls, or if they want to go all out I'm sure they could get a loudspeaker from RadioShack and mount it permanently like the Mosquito.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    57. Re:Well, you could start by... by drsquare · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just because it's illegal doesn't make it wrong.

      Only by treating others how we WISH to be treated, and not by how they treat us first, is our society going to advance.

      That Jesus crap doesn't work when you're dealing with senile dickheads who go out of their way to make other people's lives a misery.

      Remember that vigilantism is necessary when the police and relevent authorities refuse to do their jobs.
    58. Re:Well, you could start by... by Xenoflargactian · · Score: 0

      I had a similar idea, but instead of pointing the device at the sound generator, point it at the old man, and leave it on for a few days.

      Beforehand, tell him that god will punish him for his sins.

    59. Re:Well, you could start by... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Dunno about how long it'll be be good for, but DMSO is great for transporting chemicals into your blood stream. It's also handy if your veins are calcifying - I know someone with that condition that's used DMSO for about 15 years now.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    60. Re:Well, you could start by... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      When you think about it, he's doing his own escalation. I have little sympathy for jackasses that deliberately antagonize the entire neighborhood.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    61. Re:Well, you could start by... by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      This really hits home with me!
      After calling the police numerous times on little thug wannabes blasting their profanity laced "hip-hop", "rap" at 120+ decibels at 12:00 AM and standing in a dark street in the cold yelling and honking their horns. It seems to me (IMHO) that the world is made up of 999.99% noisemakers and the remainder are not allowed to sleep because of them!

      I have NO sympathy for loud obnoxious people.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    62. Re:Well, you could start by... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I'm 29 and I can here the range just fine (assuming the article linked to above in this discussion has accurate sound clips). The problem with saying that "no one" above 25 can hear it, assumes that everyone is exactly the same, which is quite far from the truth. The article author's neighborhood may just have a bunch of people that have good hearing for being over 25. As for how to deal with it: 1. Talk to the neighbor rationally, try to find out what it is he is having problems with, and see if you can arrive at a mutually agreeable solution. 2. If the neighbor is just being ridiculous in his requests (e.g. no kids playing on the street) get the police involved 3. When the police prove impotent several times, get a lawyer to file a complaint. 4. If the guy still won't be reasonable, then go ahead and disbale the device in the middle of the night. It's one thing to do as you please on your property, but when your actions are affecting the quality of life of those around you, you have overstepped your rights.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    63. Re:Well, you could start by... by shorgs · · Score: 3, Funny

      From the link: the Mosquito ultrasonic teenage deterrent has been described as "the most effective tool in our fight against anti social behaviour". Shop keepers around the world have purchased the device to move along unwanted gatherings of teenagers and anti social youths. Gatherings of anti social youths. Other featured products are, the worlds darkest lightbulb and the worlds hottest air conditioner.

    64. Re:Well, you could start by... by BrowserCapsGuy · · Score: 1

      Most condos have a clause in the declaration of condominium that grants the unit owner the "right to peaceful possession."

      Here's a practical application of that right. My next door neighbor used to have her band come over almost every weekday evening to practice. It annoyed the heck out of neighbors for several units above, below and on either side of her. Talking to the owner resulted in her quoting the county noise ordinances which were not relevant as the property deed restrictions superseded the county rules. Eventually several of the neighbors brought a civil suit against her and we won.

      --
      Alright! I know I'm in there! If I don't come out, I'll have to come in after me!
    65. Re:Well, you could start by... by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Use 2 different directional high frequency (ultra sound) drivers pointed at his house from two different places but focused at his mosquito device. One at 38kHz the other at 40kHz. Where the two wave fronts meet there will be a loud interference tone of 2kHz.

          This is a well-known technique, and all sorts of audio people have gone bonkers over it in the last several years. It was published by Blackstock and someone else in the mid-70's (at least that the effect can occur in air), and essentially uses some tricky "breakdown" of the usual linear soundwave behavior in air. I've seen it in action (a demonstration show several years ago) where a guy with a relatively small parabolic reflector was able to aim a soundbeam at various audience members. No one else could hear the sound when the thing was pointed at you. Impressive.

            However, it's technically kind of tricky, and requires some non-inexpensive transducers to effect it. And if your neighbor (or the police) isn't very near his mosquito repeller, what good will it do you?

    66. Re:Well, you could start by... by jcnnghm · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You don't have to do anything illegal to get your point across.

      Our neighbors kids used to throw balls at our fence causing our dog to bark. The barking dog annoyed the neighbor, so they reported the dog to animal control and we were threatened with a $500 fine. They never said anything to us, they just made the report, and there was nothing that we could legally do about it.

      We did, however, end up playing a Christian Rock CD on repeat from a stereo on the deck at the loudest legal level during all legal hours (I believe 7am to 11pm, I had it on a timer) every day. They tried to call the police about this multiple times, but because I knew all the legalities involved, there wasn't anything they could do about it. I believe they were forced to stop calling about it because they were threatened with filing a false report.

      Eventually (less than two weeks), they wrote me a letter apologizing for filing the report and said they wouldn't complain again about the dog barking if I stopped playing the music. The point is, sometimes the only way to compromise with an asshole is to be a bigger asshole.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    67. Re:Well, you could start by... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I suggest you read "How to Win Friends and Influence People", or take a look at Ghandi's life, or maybe just watch this vlog
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n7OKJTSVbg for a practical example. The concept that you don't get people to act in your best interests by being nasty to them but by being friendly and positive towards them to them has nothing to do with Jesus, and everything to do with learning what works.

    68. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about printing up the description of the device, taking it to the cops, and requesting a few younger cops go investigate the place?

      Not all cops are deaf to the sound.

      Btw, I'm 40 and I can hear the bloody sound too.

    69. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually (less than two weeks), they wrote me a letter apologizing for filing the report and said they wouldn't complain again about the dog barking if I stopped playing the music.

      I bet you think you and your annoying dog are real cute.

      Two words: Poison Meat

    70. Re:Well, you could start by... by Randseed · · Score: 1

      It causes pain. It's annoying. It extends off some guy's property into public areas. Someone would be perfectly within their rights to interpret it as assault and rip the thing off the wall. Then the guy has to admit that's what it was doing, since to file a poice report he'd have to acknowledge ownership of the device and say it was on his property in the first place.

    71. Re:Well, you could start by... by Salgak1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      . . . and two Wrights make an airplane, but that's not important right now . . .

    72. Re:Well, you could start by... by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my first thought exactly. "Yeah, this guy just started bothering us out of the blue, we never did anything, we're just good honest kids, gosh golly gee..."

    73. Re:Well, you could start by... by Randseed · · Score: 1

      I'm 27 and I can hear it all just fine. I even cranked it up to 21kHz and can hear it. If someone deployed something like this near my house, it would have an encounnter with a baseball bat under cloak of darkness.

    74. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that vigilantism is necessary when the police and relevent authorities refuse to do their jobs.

      OK, if you'll remember that senile dickheads still know how to use a shotgun.

      Bye, now.

    75. Re:Well, you could start by... by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The "sharing" of music with everyone is one of my biggest pet-peeves. People don't seem to realize that neighbors might want to work at home, and don't want to be distracted with, e.g. loud music of any sort.

          Or people have young children who can't sleep with crap blaring; or older people who can't sleep with crap blaring; or, just for fun, how about your friendly emergency room nurse or doctor, who happens to pull a night-shift. When THEY can't do their job effectively because of some asshole neighbor, good luck to you.

          Perhaps your neighbors did escalate things a bit much when they called animal control. However, you certainly didn't help things by keeping the whole damned neighborhood awake and crabby. Nice job.

          I'm glad that police here take noise complaints seriously, no matter what time of day they're reported.

    76. Re:Well, you could start by... by xXBondsXx · · Score: 1

      This seems a little drastic, and the problem is that the old man will know its broken. Since this old guy can't hear the device, how does he know it is working at all? I would just go up to it while he's out for a bit, snip enough of the power cord at the end so it shorts out, and leave promptly. The old man thinks that it still works, and everyone gets peace and quiet.

      --
      The voice of the next generation. "In this tower, in my mind..." Babble - Tower
    77. Re:Well, you could start by... by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      CRTs and TVs are around 15kHz. This device is well above that, I believe 18-19kHz.

    78. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, for the $2000 I'd spend on a laser (albeit a super kick ass one) I can buy lots of pellets for my pellet gun. That'd work, too.

    79. Re:Well, you could start by... by plankers · · Score: 1

      NTSC horizontal scan is 15.7 kHz.

    80. Re:Well, you could start by... by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      The article indicates it is the neighbor's fault and asks for help. People are giving advice for a problem. I could ask "What is a good book for learning Ruby, I already know C". There would be no reason to assume I am lying about knowing C for the purpose of commenting.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    81. Re:Well, you could start by... by uncreativ · · Score: 1

      Actually, frequencies that cause "bowel movements" do exist, however it is not as straightforward of an effect as it seems on the South Park episode's "brown noise".

      A lot of research has gone into this--particulary in the area of non-lethal weaponry. If you produce a frequency of sound that resonates within human organs, you can cause serious discomfort to the target.There actually exists sound scientific research on this. In a college optics class, we were assigned the task of doing our own research project. A friend of mine thought it would be funny to make his topic the brown noise. He found all kinds of research in respected physics journals about militaty applications of different kinds of noise.

    82. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Our neighbors kids used to throw balls at our fence causing our dog to bark.

      You have a fence that causes your dog to bark?

    83. Re:Well, you could start by... by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      I had a similar problem. My neighbor is a Cop and he threw mustard gas over the fence to make my dog stop barking. My mother noticed the smell, I came out, threatening to call the police, he appeared armed and uniformized. Too bad I live in a third world country were I can't expect too much from the legal system. So I had to cool heads down and since then my dog is always inside, and I never let him in the yard except for some short periods. I could have filled a complaint? Yeah, but then I could have been misteriosly shoot in the head when coming late from office. Please remember that here the pro-gun-control guns have winned the batle a long time ago, So I can't even carry a handgun on my car to have at least a minimum level of defense. And since 2004 is utterly to have a gun at home, at least as a last line of defense. Only criminals and abusive police officers have that kind of right, not law-abidding citizens. So, the only solution? move to a larger property, with 3 metters high walls, and a yard bigger enough to keep me away (and safe) from any neighbors. And that's the world we get when those guys so concerned about vigilantism make the rules.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    84. Re:Well, you could start by... by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to work 3rd shift. I would sleep from 8am to 4pm. The next door neighbor owned one large dog. His father passed away, and he inheirited a medium and small dog, all of which were now left loose in the back yard all day long while he was at work. The little dog would start barking at the slightest provocation, such as spotting a rabbit in a back yard two houses away. This would eventually get the medium dog barking for no good reason other than to join in, and the large dog even would start in. One rabbit spotting could produce 15 minutes of continuous barking from all three dogs. This would generally occur several times a day, every day. On some days it never really seemed to stop, barking almost nonstop between 10am and 4pm when I finally got up for work.

      We tried taking to him several times, but he didn't feel he had a choice since the dogs were thrust upon him and he wasn't around during the day to stop it and could not leave the dogs in his house during the day. (I hear they ripped the place apart whenever he was away) So he made his problem my problem.

      We finally tried some phonecalls and that got him several warnings which went largely ignored. I talked with other neighbors only to find out that several of us had called in complaints. But they would send no more written warnings now, the only recourse we were left with at that point was filing a written complaint, which would fetch him a fine, and our name would be on the ticket as the complainer. We decided it wasn't worth it and to just deal with the barking. (same for the other neighbors, we did not wish to start a fight) I was very thankful when he finally found a home for the animals (all of them!) a few months later.

      Most people that own problem-barking dogs take the view that it is not their problem and that they neither have any control over their animal nor is disturbance created by the dog their responsibility. These are the ones that will respond with "what do you want me to do, tape his mouth shut?" or the one they always come up with, "a dog's gonna bark." For these people, until you make your problem their problem, they will refuse to do anything about it. Consideration for others is not as common of a trait as you might imagine. In these cases you often have to appeal to the more basic "cause and effect" concept that can be used to show reason to even the rock heads.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    85. Re:Well, you could start by... by pizpot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      and I found that EAR PLUGS work great, and keep me from yelling at the kids when I am trying to sleep during the day because I worked last night. Sure I tried to win the battle by asking them to shut up but in the end, only ear plugs worked.

    86. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uggh mega anoying on all freqs that the thing does to me. The 19 is very soft but can be heard if I turn up the vol a bit. I am in my mid 30s.

      I would sue. As the guy is actually setting out to be a prat. I would also look in the covenants of the houses. While most are not enforcable they are a contract under which all homeowners of the area are subject to. So the owners of the homes around the area could have grounds. Yep time to get a lawyer involved.

      Also if he can not hear the thing why not just disable it? How would he know its broke?

    87. Re:Well, you could start by... by aakron · · Score: 1

      Hee hee, you said "alimentation"

      alimentation

            1. The act or process of giving or receiving nourishment.
            2. Support; sustenance.

      From: www.dictionary.com

      You mean the wires?

    88. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      at 120+ decibels at 12:00 AM ... the world is made up of 999.99% noisemakers

      Taking into account your grasp of percentages, I'm not certain I believe the 120 decibels part. And maybe not even the 12AM part.

    89. Re:Well, you could start by... by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      you need tto learn the difference between amoral and illegal, they aren't even related. If you don't know what the moral thing to do in this situation is, you are pretty stupid.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    90. Re:Well, you could start by... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      The range of the chavbuster is not likely to cover a "neighborhood", which begs the question of how much time the OP and his buds feel they need to spend around the immediate area of the old person who does not want their company. People don't want to be close and stay close to other people without a motive.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    91. Re:Well, you could start by... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Poison my dog and *you* get instant lead poisoning.

    92. Re:Well, you could start by... by dougmc · · Score: 1
      or take a look at Ghandi's life
      And while you're preaching to us to turn the other cheek, I suggest you take a look at Gandi's death -- shot dead at a prayer meeting in New Delhi by Nathuram Godse .


      To be fair, I didn't know how Gandi died before I decided to respond to your post, as don't always remember the finer points of history, but I did remember the general idea that people with lots of influence often create lots of enemies, and considering that Gandi's general philosophy probably didn't provide him with lots of protection, the odds of him coming to an unfortunate end were rather high ...

      Personally, if somebody put something up like this Mosquito device in our neighborhood, I would not turn the other cheek. Being 37, I guess I couldn't hear it, but all it would take would be for my kids (ages 3 and 5) or some other neighborhood kids to tell me about it and let me know what it is, and I would make it my crusade to make the police aware of it, even going so far as finding a way to measure the noise to convince the police that it's there (though I'm surprised that they dismiss the claim out of hand as reported.) I'd even put a few hundred dollars into suing the guy, I'd sick the neighborhood association on him (as odious as they are), and if all of those methods failed, I'd even be inclined to physically destory it somehow.

      People who do things like that are NOT the sort of people I'd want in my neighborhood.

      And besides, I thought if you wanted the teenagers to go away, you just played Barry Manilow and Perry Como records?

    93. Re:Well, you could start by... by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      Except that C doesn't have its own life and viewpoint. It's not a person.

      I'm not saying the poster is lying, I'm just pointing out that there's more than one perspective to the problem.

    94. Re:Well, you could start by... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "Also if he can not hear the thing why not just disable it? How would he know its broke?"

      good point, but you'd have to be stealthy about it so he couldn't tell visibly that it wasn't working.

      If the wire is exposed cut it and wrap it back with electrical tape for black wire or tape that would match the wire.

      If it's not exposed I'm guessing any large amount of liquid would probably kill it. Since I'm sure it's mounted several feet off the ground I'm thinking maybe a can of wasp-killer spray? The come highly compressed, some cans shoot 30+ feet, doubt it's mounted 3 stories above the ground.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    95. Re:Well, you could start by... by marciot · · Score: 1

      > Hee hee, you said "alimentation" ... You mean the wires?

      I'll venture a guess that the person who used that word is fluent in some language other than American English. I know in at least one language (Brazilian Portuguese), is common to use the word "alimentation" in regards to speakers or electronics. It is true that word means "nourish", but it is no different than the use of the English word "feed" in such context (such as a "television feed").

      -- Marcio

    96. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's entirely possible this kid's home is close enough to the fellow's property to be able to hear it all the time. (Especially if the house doesn't have air conditioning, so the windows must remain open.) Or perhaps the man's near a public park?

    97. Re:Well, you could start by... by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      I'm not much of a fan of rap music, but if someone is stupid enough to think it is good and ignorent enough not to know how loud they are playing it, it's not really morally comparable to purchasing a machine designed to annoy certain demographics. One is classic youthful stupidity and egocentric thought, the other is deliberate harm.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    98. Re:Well, you could start by... by stonecypher · · Score: 0

      Remember that vigilantism is necessary when the police and relevent authorities refuse to do their jobs.

      Yeah, you're not Batman, and an anti-mosquito device passed by the FCC isn't reason to go trapsing onto other people's property to destroy things. Believe it or not, even your mighty minor miscomfort does not empower you to behave however you see fit.

      If the police refuse to do their jobs. Honestly. The boys in blue aren't here to settle minor complaints between one oversensitive and one undersensitive neighbor. Tell him to bring the old man a six pack and ask about his time in the war, not to go breaking things. You really think the old man would just say "oh well, I give up" if this guy lashes out?

      Your lack of self control and your obvious deep commitment to decent behavior is appalling.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    99. Re:Well, you could start by... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      It's funny how many people go "omg that guy is such a jerk because he made a noise," and then suggest destroying a thousand dollars' worth of hardware as appropriate retribution. It's almost as if you have no sense of scale. Hell, even if you want to be a jerk back, be creative: send him some low frequency back.

      Destroying a thousand dollar device is a good way to get thrown in jail. Do not underestimate the angry nature of someone willing to dump a thousand bucks into pissing you off.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    100. Re:Well, you could start by... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The most likely outcome to you being an even bigger asshole is that your opponent will take his turn to out asshole you. It's called escalation, and it rarely works to the advantage of either involved.

    101. Re:Well, you could start by... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Mustard gas is what they used in World War One. It's deadly poison. If your mother came out and noticed the smell, she wouldn't be calling the police, she'd be too busy clutching her throat and dying.

    102. Re:Well, you could start by... by Warshadow · · Score: 1

      While I agree destroying the thing is not an appropriate _FIRST_ action. I wonder if you have ever heard a 17 kHz tone? With the proper volume it can be downright painful.

    103. Re:Well, you could start by... by MegaHyster · · Score: 0

      Makes it a bit difficult to hear the alarm...

      --
      All good things...
    104. Re:Well, you could start by... by El+Bigote · · Score: 1

      That's the spirit. Do you happen to know the words to the Horst Wessel Leid as well?

      --
      UNIX is truth, the Console is life. Use Evolution to send e-mail and not virii.
    105. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed my first reaction as well. However, I don't think that cruising cars are the culprit, since it's easy to close windows and move on. I suspect the old guy has a property with surfaces that the skater boys congregate to.

      Once I turned 30, I realized that I couldn't stand those little whiny skater boys complaining about their rights to colonize every private and public flat surface, all the while wearing droopy pants and sneakers made by child labor in Asian sweat shops.

    106. Re:Well, you could start by... by pugugly · · Score: 1

      Whereas your more mature approach impresses us deeply.

      Pug

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    107. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I give the parent poster the benefit of the doubt and think they mean pepper spray - both sound food based, and an aerosol spray can be easily mistaken for a gas by those not familiar with chemical weapons. Now if he'd said Sarin or VX...

    108. Re:Well, you could start by... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      These are the ones that will respond with "what do you want me to do, tape his mouth shut?" or the one they always come up with, "a dog's gonna bark.",

      Around here if someone's dog annoys a neighbour, he's likely to feed it some chicken laced with pesticide.

    109. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if that doesn't work, just unplug the thing and put glue in the outlets to keep it from getting plugged back in.

      If it were me, I would look to see if the neighborhood dogs react to the noise, and if so ask for a K9 Police to respond to the call. Explain that you are worried about the animals and that they may go crazy.

      If all else fails, use a HERF gun, or use a spectrum analyzer to find the frequency then just play the same frequency 180 degrees out of phase.

    110. Re:Well, you could start by... by 49152 · · Score: 1

      More like young at ear ;)

    111. Re:Well, you could start by... by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      Ghandi was quite smart, and very lucky. If the British hadn't been licking their wounds from WWII, and reconsidering the whole Empire business, Ghandi probably would have failed. Also, Ghandi's techniques only worked, because the British are basically decent people (after you peel away the Imperial atrocities). They weren't willing to kill enough millions, or pop a non-violent old man in the head, to defeat Ghandi. Don't assume that Ghandi's methods will work at most times and places. Same thing goes for Martin Luther King; if the Americans were right bastards, the footage of police dogs attacking black people trying to register to vote in Selma would have been entertainment. Our basic decency (even among many of the Southerners) spurred us to action.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    112. Re:Well, you could start by... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1
      Remember: two wrongs don't make a right.

      It usually takes three or four.

    113. Re:Well, you could start by... by Blymie · · Score: 1

      Ear plugs are not a reasonable recourse. It prevents hearing the phone ring, from hearing your house being broken into, and any other reason you may need to be woken up for a legitimate noisy reason.

    114. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for remembering the grand old man. But I wonder when people will get the spelling right? Pronouncing it wrong is still ok (considering the difference in phonetics of different languages), but spelling it wrong? It is spelt Gandhi. Please.

    115. Re:Well, you could start by... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Use 2 directional low frequency drivers pointed at his house that would cause him to have a bowel movement.

      Apparently the so called "brown note" is a myth...

      Use 2 different directional high frequency (ultra sound) drivers pointed at his house from two different places but focused at his mosquito device. One at 38kHz the other at 40kHz. Where the two wave fronts meet there will be a loud interference tone of 2kHz.

      Actually you'd only need one signal source. Since his device(s) are already generating one ultrasound frequency.
      Though you might want to consider using sounds higher than 60kHz so as not to bother any dog owners.

    116. Re:Well, you could start by... by mpe · · Score: 1

      When the police prove impotent several times, get a lawyer to file a complaint.

      Probably also someone who can take measurements of the sound.

    117. Re:Well, you could start by... by tylernt · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could offer to buy your neighbor one of those collars that shock the dog when it barks.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    118. Re:Well, you could start by... by mpe · · Score: 1

      this site has a 19khz and 17khz 3-second clip. The 17 is very easy to hear and would chase me off after awhile and I'm going on 30. I can't hear the 19khz at all, guess I don't have to buy those headphones that go up to 22khz anymore ;)

      I'm closer to 40 than to 30, yet I could hear the 19k track.

      The really scary thing is anyone who can't hear these frequencies could crank this and play 24/7 for free with only a PC and speakers,

      Assuming that your speakers can reproduce the frequency of course :)

    119. Re:Well, you could start by... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      How would like it, if for instance you had a five year old daughter who was in constant discomfort and couldn't even sleep because some old cunt next door had a mosquito device? I don't think you'd be so sympathetic to anti-social dickheads.

    120. Re:Well, you could start by... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for the $2000 I'd spend on a laser (albeit a super kick ass one) I can buy lots of pellets for my pellet gun. That'd work, too.

      The idea is that using the device as target practice for a 0.3W laser would be less obvious...

    121. Re:Well, you could start by... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The thing is, different chemicals require different solvents. DMSO is great for transporting garlic, or the taste of the insides of your shoe...but this doesn't mean it would work for "anything". E.g. it's not particularly good at transporting the taste of iron filings.

      My impression is that it works best with oil soluble chemicals...but it could be alcohol soluble or ether soluble and I wouldn't know, as I haven't done any personal experimentation, merely read a few things. But LSD is water soluble. This doesn't mean it *isn't* oil soluble, but it means not to expect it.

      So my guess it that putting DMSO that had soaked in an old gym shoe on the door handle would have more effects. The smell is reported to come out on your breath for hours. (Of course, you don't want to get any on yourself :)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    122. Re:Well, you could start by... by Misterfixit · · Score: 0

      Did you know that less than ten percent of random homicides are solved? Best way to solve the problem is to wait until he is doddering out onto his lawn and then shoot him dead with a crossbow -- using one of those deer points for maximum damage. Coat the point with fecal material (not your own ((think DNA)) but one from a portable construction site). The cross bow is silent, had great accuracy and unless you are a total retard would have been obtained without you attached to it ... Go ahead, the old fuck pisses you off? Kill him! I mean, he's old and got one foot inthe grave anyway ... Jeeze, how hard is that to figure out?

      --
      nar
    123. Re:Well, you could start by... by dougmc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I noticed that after I posted. It wasn't worth another post to correct, however. The original poster said Ghandi, which is also wrong.

    124. Re:Well, you could start by... by mrobin604 · · Score: 1

      Consideration for others also includes just dealing with the fact that you live next to people and you're going to hear them make noise, and not complaining about every last little thing.

      I had a downstairs neighbor who would call the landlord and complain that I was "walking too loud". He was upset because the upstairs apartment had been vacant for six months and he got to like not hearing anyone, so it bothered him that there was someone there now. So he tried to get my landlord to kick us out. I lived in another building with thin walls, and I would get complaints from coming home from work and watching TV at a _low_ volume level (I could barely hear it from my couch 8 feet away).

      I live in LA and some people here seem to expect that it should be as quiet as rural North Dakota, and are upset when it's not. You don't like hearing your neighbors? Play your radio on a relaxing channel when you go to sleep. Wear earplugs. Move to a building with thicker walls, or buy a house. If that doesn't work, maybe you shouldn't be living in a city.

      I'm not saying you should be as loud as you want to, but I think you should be able to live a normal daily life without having to think about if your neighbor is going to call your landlord again because you had someone over for dinner and they could hear you talking.

    125. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ban automobile subwoofers. There's the solution! LOL We all hear these things, yet a lot of kids seem to feel they have some "right" to make everyone else hear AND feel their choice of music. It's annoying when you can't even talk with your kids in the backseat because some idiot has the bass blaring. I'm 45; I CAN hear these mosquito devices loud and clear. It would bother me every bit as much as the loud bass (except the bass will travel through walls better)! So how about just keeping it down? Is the reason he's doing this just because he's cranky (not all older people are unreasonable, and sure enough you'll be one too), or is it because you are blaring your bass into everyone's home? This is a serious question and I'm not taking sides.

    126. Re:Well, you could start by... by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are right, and I managed to confuse the gas. It was PEPPER gas, not mustard, the kind used by police against crowds. Anyway, it was thrown INSIDE of my property, at my dog, which was 8 months old at the time (what explains why he was barking that much).

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    127. Re:Well, you could start by... by kjs3 · · Score: 1
      You don't have to do anything illegal to get your point across...The point is, sometimes the only way to compromise with an asshole is to be a bigger asshole.

      Congrats...you are clearly the bigger asshole. Mission accomplished.

      BTW...how did your other neighbors like having to listen to your crap for 2 weeks while you proved your bigger asshole status?

    128. Re:Well, you could start by... by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      Agreed - my first reaction to this is WTF?! It's a shame that we live in such a paranoid society where everybody thinks their neighbor is "out to get them" and that somehow that justifies an escalating spiral of "revenge" tactics. Life is too f'king short..you all should learn to relax more.

      I have seen this with some friends family members. One has a grandmother who is in her 80s, who is constantly concerned that the neighbors are spying on her, "screwing her" in a variety of ways, etc etc. I can think of *NOTHING* that her 20 - 40 year old neighbors could care less about then what an 80 year old woman does, or even to take the time out of their lives to screw with her.

      In reality, she seems to suffer from HPD, which is in the family of illnesses more commonly called a "borderline personalities" This is someone who is not outright dysfunctional, but nevertheless has some serious issues. The fact that the submitters neighbor feels he needs to do this (assuming people really aren't screwing with him), probably indicates some issue :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    129. Re:Well, you could start by... by CommieOverlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      should be as quiet as rural North Dakota,

      I was chatting with some friends in their living room one friday night, with the windows/patio door open to let in air. The neighbour across the backyard came over to complain because she "couldn't hear the leaves in the trees".

    130. Re:Well, you could start by... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      oh btw the device in question is not an antimosquito device is emulates a mosquito (same type of high frequency stuff you get from any soonish to be frying transformer/cap)
      think fingernails on chalkboard +100

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    131. Re:Well, you could start by... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      well if i was about/found out i would

      1 beat the freak senseless

      2 remove the offending portion

      3 run the removed portion in a blender

      4 call 911

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    132. Re:Well, you could start by... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      But LSD is water soluble. This doesn't mean it *isn't* oil soluble, but it means not to expect it.

      So use THC? That should be water soluble, right?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    133. Re:Well, you could start by... by BalanceOfJudgement · · Score: 2, Informative
      Assuming that your speakers can reproduce the frequency of course :)
      At first I was thinking "Blast.. I AM going deaf..."

      Then I realized my speakers only go up to 16KHz. :) I need to find some other speakers to try this on...
      --

      We are the fire that lights our world.. and we are the fire that consumes it.
    134. Re:Well, you could start by... by gutnor · · Score: 1

      Indeed the word comes straight from French. Same as you said for Brazilian Portuguese, the word alimentation is also used for "electricity supply". The PSU of a computer for example is called an "Alimentation". Power Leads are called "Alimentation" cables.

    135. Re:Well, you could start by... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      High frequency sounds are easily attenuated by solid objects, and the higher the frequency, the more easily attenuated it is. Shutting the window would probably work, and even if you had to buy an AC, it would be cheaper than going to court.

    136. Re:Well, you could start by... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Who gives a shit? Its not your or my ass that's going to wind up in jail.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    137. Re:Well, you could start by... by westlake · · Score: 1
      The article indicates it is the neighbor's fault and asks for help. People are giving advice for a problem.

      Neighborhood conflicts like these can easily escalate into violence: a shotgun blast from an old man who is simply tired and hurting. You don't begin by offering advice. You begin by asking the right questions. You assume nothing, if you are wise.

    138. Re:Well, you could start by... by ZiakII · · Score: 1

      Once I turned 30, I realized that I couldn't stand those little whiny skater boys complaining about their rights to colonize every private and public flat surface, all the while wearing droopy pants and sneakers made by child labor in Asian sweat shops.

      O god I only have 9 years left...before I turn into the olderside of slashdot *sobs*

    139. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that in the real world everyone pushes you around and it's only in the security of the internet that you manage to work yourself up to some righteous fit of "manlyness".

    140. Re:Well, you could start by... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      We did, however, end up playing a Christian Rock CD on repeat from a stereo on the deck at the loudest legal level during all legal hours
      Talk about cutting of your nose to spite your face...
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    141. Re:Well, you could start by... by M-G · · Score: 1

      If the dogs cause problems inside, why doesn't he crate them?

    142. Re:Well, you could start by... by spun · · Score: 1

      So use THC? That should be water soluble, right?

      No. If it were, it would dissolve in bong-water and smoking a bong wouldn't get you high.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    143. Re:Well, you could start by... by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      Co-incidentally my Significant Other also has hearing problems in the exact frequencies that I talk in. Doesnt seem to have any problem hearing other people though.

      Although, the problem seems to go away if I say anything negative about her, she seems to hear just fine then. That does cause HER voice to raise a few frequencies though.

      Science is yet to explain this strange phenomenon.

    144. Re:Well, you could start by... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between being sympathetic to the abuser next door and condoning one's own bad behavior. To be clear, I'd be costing that cop his job for not getting it fixed.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    145. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Could be as effective as a .22 round applied in the same manor"

      Well if you shoot at thing inside your own home, it's quite effective, yes.

    146. Re:Well, you could start by... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I can hear it too, at 35. Shocked the Hell out of me when someone first played it and I could hear it (especially since I've listened to loud music with headphones for 20 years now and figured my hearing must be pretty damaged).

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    147. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being a wuss. If anybody is willing to piss a bunch of people off, then I'd say a baseball bat to the device is a fitting response. F' him. Are you willing to be held hostage by some bastard neighbor? Not me, and not my family.

    148. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You could offer to buy your neighbor one of those collars that shock the dog when it barks.

      Too bad those don't actually work.

      I had a dog that would sometimes bark for no good reason. I found that spending more time with him helped the situation a lot. Then I had another dog move in, and the two of them would bark. I didn't realize this was even going on until I got a visit from the animal control officer. I talked to her and told her to tell the folks making the complaint three things: (1) My cell phone number and to call it when it was happening; (2) If I don't know which dog is barking, I can't even begin to fix the problem, so next time please note which one it is (or both); (3) To please drop by for a beer or unoffensive beverage of their choice, on me, even if there's no further barking.

      The folks making the anonymous complaint never took me up on any of the offers. I never did anything further about the barking, except to tell the dogs they were being bad when they were barking for no good reason when I was at home. I also put a note on my front door that said "Barking dog? Call XXX XXX-XXXX and I'll come home and fix it". Never did get any calls. I also had neighbors that I was on good terms with listen for my dogs barking with instructions to call me, or at least mention it to me next time I was around. The few times I asked them, they said they never heard it.

      Needless to say, I'm quite irked at the folks that made the original complaint at this point. While it didn't cost me anything I still don't know who they are, or know which of my dogs was barking or why they might be barking. Maybe the more frequent walks we take them on has helped? Maybe there's still a problem and I'm being a bad neighbor. I have no way of knowing which is true...

    149. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely the right thing to do. Somebody suck it up and bring him a fresh baked apple pie or do some other nice thing to attempt to make him feel welcomed by his neighbors. It might not work, and don't expect it to....but that kind of response has a lot more power than any escalation or counter attack ...(guess I'm naive too.)

    150. Re:Well, you could start by... by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      Well I can't get more detailed information, but on Episode 25: Brown Note of MythBusters they dissected this myth. I may be a computer scientist, not a physicist, but they sure answered this myth well enough for me: busted. Adam felt discomfort, but no bowel movements, pain, or other serious issues. Just didn't feel normal. He was surrounded by woofers and able to function normally.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    151. Re:Well, you could start by... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1
      People don't seem to realize that neighbors might want to work at home, and don't want to be distracted with, e.g. loud music of any sort...


      Actually, if the developers didn't cram us together like sardines on ever shrinking plots so they can 'maximize' their investments (while minimizing quality of life) this wouldn't be an issue.

      It is almost too expensive for you to own a piece of land larger than 1/8 of an acre in the suburbs anymore. And you can have the 'upper middle-class' side of town, where everyone crams 4000 sq ft. houses on 1/4 acre plots - close enough together to touch with arms outstretched. It is disconcerting to step out on your patio and look up to see the neighbor staring at you through his kitchen window.

      Studies have been done with rats where the lack of space lead to competition for limited resources (sleeping platforms), violence, and psychotic problems in the animals.

      My next place is going to be in a low property tax rural area - so I can get the seperation necessary to keep my mental health intact - thank you.

      Now - get off my lawn!
      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    152. Re:Well, you could start by... by AaronHorrocks · · Score: 1

      Indeedly so...
      I'm 25, and due to moderate use of medium and large caliber firearms with (what I can NOW tell you) what wasn't enough hearing protection; I'm practically hearing impared. I have to turn all my speakers and devices up to their 75%-100% volume settings to hear them. Phones are worse. I have to turn them up all the way and cram them into my ear and strain to hear 'em.

      I have learned that being partically deaf has many advantages. I find it hard to hear small kids or gabbing teenage girls. The world is a quiet place.
      haha :D

    153. Re:Well, you could start by... by AaronHorrocks · · Score: 1

      Not always. If a neighboring country (or force, or regime) has been trying to commit genocide to the race that you happen to belong to, you would support the "destruction of property" of their weapons, factories, and transportation systems, right?
      No one has the right to violate your rights, so you'd support the defense of them, right?

      If a grumpy old man is pestering the entire neighborhood with audio that infringes on the lives of all these people, why can't they destroy it?
      It's clear that they have already gone through every civil means possible to try to get the guy to stop.

      A quick demostration of violent force in destroying the object from the start would have spared a lot of headaches, wasted police time, tax money, and most likely - this news.

    154. Re:Well, you could start by... by notaspunkymonkey · · Score: 1

      You see the Poison Meat comment has made me have to tell my story. My Neighbours have a noisy dog... this doesnt bother me though as I have 2 noisy kids - however on the other side of the fence they have a guy who lives alone - he is always rowing with my neighbours over the wall (the people next door are a real nice lesbian couple) and telling them that their kids (one of them by previous relationship) need a man in the house to show them whats right and wrong etc and would they shut that f*&king dog up before he kills it - the dogs continue to bark until one day the dogs stop - the moody old bloke has tried to kill them with Rat poison on some meat - when the women discover what is happening one of them gets in a row with him over the fence again - he threatens to kick her head in etc - anyway at some point he decides to climb over the fence and punches the butch woman next door - at this point I jumped over the wall and broke his nose - the moral of the story - dont get involved with disputes with your neighbours (I got 3 months and lost my job for assault (1st offence) he got nothing...) the dogs still bark

    155. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He was surrounded by woofers"

      If you know anything about sound waves, I'd say 'surrounding' yourself with woofers probably isn't the best way to test anything.

    156. Re:Well, you could start by... by blakestah · · Score: 1

      I'm 38 and I can hear them just fine.

      High frequency hearing loss is a definite trend, but cannot be used to predict individual responses. The hair cells in the cochlea that encode high frequencies are the highest metabolism hair cells, and they are the ones that die first, which leads to high frequency hearing loss.

      There was a story a while back about a high frequency ringtone that kids used in classrooms thinking their teacher could not hear it...but some teachers can still hear 17 kHz just fine.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/12/technology/12rin g.html

    157. Re:Well, you could start by... by ameoba · · Score: 1

      If they were cruising the block with music blaring, a fixed position high-frequency noise emitter with a max range of about 65 feet would be rather ineffective...

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    158. Re:Well, you could start by... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Going to the police might work, but there's a better tactic... public opinion.

      Write the guy a letter and send it certified mail calmly explaining that the use of his mosquito device is causing your 5 year old daughter extreme discomfort. Further explain that your young daughter is the only person who is suffering and nobody else. Then calming ask that he turn it off for the sake of your young daughter.

      When he doesn't, write another letter, but instead send it to everybody on the whole block explaining that "Mr. X" has installed this device and provide details about what it does and poor your heart out about how your daughter is crying everyday and how terrible the whole sitiuation is. Make sure to include the cutest picture of your daughter possible.

      Needless to say, hell have no fury like a grandmother thinking a cute little girl is being harmed, trust me!

      The q-tips of the neighborhood will practiaclly mark in lock step to his front door.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    159. Re:Well, you could start by... by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Three lefts do...

    160. Re:Well, you could start by... by v1 · · Score: 1

      I view this as the neighbor handing off his problem on me. I suppose on principle I would refuse to pay for something to solve his problem for him. If this were a case where I felt this was an unavoidable issue and not really his fault to begin with I might go for that option, but not in this case.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    161. Re:Well, you could start by... by herbierobinson · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure the brown note is a myth. I remember sitting on a washing machine when I was a kid and having to get up very quickly... I can easily believe it requires a direct mechnical connection with the vibrating surface and more energy than you can get from a speaker.

      A speaker cable of directing those frequencies accurately would be larger than most yards and very expensive...

      I would go for a beat frequency of more like 10KHz -- much more annoying than 2KHz. I would go for something fairly wide dispersion and put it at the edge of the offender's yard, but it's still going to bleed back and really annoy everybody... Hook it up to a motion detector so it only came on when he was in his yard...

      --
      An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
    162. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its limitedly soluble in water. how else do you think it gets in your blood through the lungs? some THC is dissolved in bong water, yes. but not that much, especially considering the smoke does not come in contact with the water for that long, and only the outer surface area of the smoke bubbles.

    163. Re:Well, you could start by... by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      And you can have the 'upper middle-class' side of town, where everyone crams 4000 sq ft. houses on 1/4 acre plots - close enough together to touch with arms outstretched. It is disconcerting to step out on your patio and look up to see the neighbor staring at you through his kitchen window

      cram a 4000sqft house onto a 1/4-acre and then touch your neighbors house? only if you live in tract housing with lots less than 70ft wide. I live in a nice 'upper middle-class' neighborhood in Austin Tx with a 3500sqft house on a square 1/4-acre (120x100, close enough) with at least 40ft between houses. this ain't no McMansion. it also helps if you have trees. you know, those big leafy green things that have bark on them?

      as for the rest of your post, you're right.

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    164. Re:Well, you could start by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And "spelt" is spelled "spelled".

    165. Re:Well, you could start by... by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 1

      Try simply taking a mouthpiece and buzzing on it, and practice lipping up or down. It works better with a woodwind, if you lip, but the noise is pretty horrible with a horn's, too.

      --
      Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
    166. Re:Well, you could start by... by wadiwood · · Score: 1

      Some of the shopping centers in my local area found playing Frank Sinatra music or elevator music would also repel teenagers but not other shoppers.

      --

      -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  3. Ask Slashdot? by ag0ny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Instead of "Ask Slashdot", shouldn't this be under "Ask Your Lawyer"?

    1. Re:Ask Slashdot? by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      Sadly slashdot is the geek's lawyer, and I think the question is more "where do I buy an EMP" then "how do I sue an old man" anyway...

    2. Re:Ask Slashdot? by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To settle disputes, turning to a lawyer may not be the correct move. I mean, a lot of times it is, but there is the chance it gets expensive and out of hand. I would consider turning to the lawyer only for egregious offenses, or a last resort.

      An annoying neighbor is not there yet (as a first step) unless they start to build fences on your side of the property or something of that level.

    3. Re:Ask Slashdot? by arivanov · · Score: 5, Informative

      If it is in the UK you can use the standard laws against nuisance noise for which you do not need a lawyer. Dig the relevant address of your council website, write a well written letter and off you go. Same as with security lights shining with your windows. No need for using your lawyers. This is something you pay for using your council tax.

      Most other legislations around EU (and many other countries outside it) are not any different. All you need to do is find the relevant local council address and send a complaint. They will send an engineer with measuring equipment at your site ASAP. The mere appearance of the van with the measurement equipment may be enough for the idiot Meldrew clone to take his Mosquito and shovel it where sun does not shine.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Inda · · Score: 1
      Dig the relevant address of your council website

      If this is in the UK then the council website should have an online form you can fill in. On my local council website you don't even have to give your name or address or any other personnal details. I use mine regularly to get fly-tipping rubbish and litter removed from my area.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    5. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      If, however, your local council (in the UK) is Arun District Council:

      1) Many of the email addresses on their Web site bounce back as 'unknown recipient'

      2) I sent an email to the planning department 3 weeks ago (no bounce!) and still have not received a reply. /just sayin

      PS: Any Arun DC IT support staff read this site? If so, fix your email and tell your staff to READ THEIR MAIL.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    6. Re:Ask Slashdot? by antoinjapan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except in the UK the council puts them up.
      http://www.compoundsecurity.co.uk/deterrent_news_8 5.html

    7. Re:Ask Slashdot? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Sadly slashdot is the geek's lawyer, and I think the question is more "where do I buy an EMP" then "how do I sue an old man" anyway...

      Can't you build one yourself ? From what I've understood, you can generate an electromagnetic pulse simply by turning an electromagnet off rapidly - the collapsing magnetic field will generate the pulse. So get a very thick copper coil, pump low-voltage high-current electricity to it until it glows cherry red, then cut the the power. Bam, instant EMP.

      The main problems are the speed of field collapse - the standard method involves wrapping the coil around explosives and detonating them, but that's dangerous and explosives are pretty hard to get, and besides you can only fire it once - and aiming; the pulse will be omnidirectional, while in this case we want it to travel to a single direction so it only frys stuff in the old bastards home.

      I knew I should have become an electrical engineer, then I could design this weapon easily :(.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    8. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Maximalist · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, initiating a lawsuit shouldn't be beyond the ability or budget of anybody here. Depends on your state, but some places you can file a "Writ of Summons" that lets the other party know you've got beef with them, and open the door to discovery for you, without having to draft a proper legal complaint. The pre-complaint discovery is to help you draft the complaint... If the form for the Writ wants the gist of your action, the magic word here is "nuisance". Serve the grumpy old geezer with a Writ, and then serve him with interrogatories asking all kinds of information about the device, where he purchased it, when he installed it, why he installed it, what its specs are, etc... . If he ignores them, then pay a lawyer to argue for sanctions for contempt of court for his disobedience of the order to answer them that comes with the interrogatories. Where I am, you're looking at a total bill of maybe $500 at that point, and most of that is paying the lawyer to put the screws to him. If the lawyer is good, you might get attorney's fees assessed against the grumpy old guy too, so you costs just went way down again.

    9. Re:Ask Slashdot? by tkdog · · Score: 1

      Well sure, you could do it that way. What you don't HAVE any plutonium? I guess I'm just a traditionalist.

    10. Re:Ask Slashdot? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Well sure, you could do it that way. What you don't HAVE any plutonium? I guess I'm just a traditionalist.

      What do you need plutonium for ? The inductor loop is made of copper, and the explosive only needs to be strong enough to blow it apart, not vaporize it utterly.

      Altought, now that I think of it, hiding some plutonium on the guys property and reporting him for being a suspected terrorist might also work. It's even accurate, since he is terrorizing his neighborhood.

      Or just report him and then call him from a payphone, say "We'll strike now !", hang up, and let the wiretappers draw their own conclusions >:]...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    11. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. He should spray paint his tag all over the guy's property as many times as possible then get some bitch'n tats and piercings. Then he should buy a black hoodie and a Honda Civic with a sewer pipe exhaust, a bolt on wing, and a gut rumbling sound system. After all of that he can complain about how adults don't understand him and they are lame.

    12. Re:Ask Slashdot? by AusIV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Suing gets expensive and out of hand. Consulting a lawyer about a public nuissance, and possibly having the lawyer send a letter to the offender would probably be wise, and relatively inexpensive.

    13. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively..

      Come up with a plan for a park for the neighborhood that is best put right where his home is.
      Become friends with your local planning department.
      Use eminent domain to get rid of the geezer..

    14. Re:Ask Slashdot? by ArwynH · · Score: 1
      Or just report him and then call him from a payphone, say "We'll strike now !", hang up, and let the wiretappers draw their own conclusions >:]...

      In Soviet Russia... people used to do just that...

    15. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 1

      Of course, if it's in the U.S., you're out of luck. Security lights, blowers and lawnmowers (often with defunct or absent mufflers), 150-decibel motorcycles, deep-thumping sound systems, if you complain about _any_ of it, you're gonna be seen as some kind of weirdo.

      Which may explain the occasional snipers. People just lose it, because they apparently can't DO anything about it.

    16. Re:Ask Slashdot? by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In Soviet Russia... people used to do just that...

      And now that the Soviet Union is gone and the West no longer has any reason to keep up its image, the West is fast becoming the new Soviet block, at least as far as legal system and people's rights are concerned. Isn't historical irony wonderfull ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    17. Re:Ask Slashdot? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      In the state of California, U.S.A., one has the "Right of Quiet and Peaceful Occupation of one's home." That means from 10:00 pm to 6:00 am, if there is noise or loud music, one merely calls the police; Usually about 30 minutes later a "Black and White" shows up to see what the problem is. Most times, the problem gets quiet around 10:00 pm.

      Now should the party persist, then the asshole with a uniform, gun(s), and working radio; Will call more assholes over to see what the problem is. About this point in time, one can see the drama on CNN.

    18. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gladly, all you bastards who want a government pension should band together and buy it yourself, leave the rest of us alone

    19. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      An annoying neighbor is not there yet (as a first step) unless they start to build fences on your side of the property or something of that level.

      Still not lawyerbait. Get a survey to prove it, then cut the fence down with a chainsaw and stack it on your side of the lawn.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    20. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      In the state of California, U.S.A., one has the "Right of Quiet and Peaceful Occupation of one's home." That means from 10:00 pm to 6:00 am, if there is noise or loud music, one merely calls the police;

      No it doesn't. There are noise regulations, but all your quote means is that your landlord can't barge in unanounced.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    21. Re:Ask Slashdot? by noldrin · · Score: 1

      yes, if it is actually a lot of people who are experiencing discomfort, you guys need to pool your money and hire a lawyer to get a court order for him to turn it off.

    22. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      Putin's Russia, by any standards, is not what could be called a democracy. The kind of things that russian government does right now makes NSA actions sound pretty mild in comparison. Against reality your post is utterly non-sensical and prejudicious.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    23. Re:Ask Slashdot? by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      There was more to the Soviet Union then Russia... and Russia by itself is hardly any different then most other world nations. "There is worse" is not an excuse to become worse. Just like being best isn't reason to not be better.

    24. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      While it's a fact that there were more to USSR than Russia, it's a historical fact that the imbalance of power always looked more like a Russian Empire than anything else, Stalin was a Georgian, but in fact his ways of power always strived for the russification of the soviet empire.
      Said that, It's hard to see how can you say that Russia is not very different from, say, US, Germany, France or UK when it comes to democracy. In recent times he replaced several electoral laws, eliminating direct vote for governors, changed the parliamentary elections process to a somewhat indirect one that extends his powers and minimizes the opposition. Not to mention the reprobable involvement in the sovereign affairs of Ukraine on their last election, with even a presumable attemp to murder Yuschenko.
      Not to mention, the imprisonenment of Khodorkovsky.
      Just for a comparison, at US you can question the government over things like the NSA's wiretaps, but in current Russia, things like that are just business as usual.
      Based on reality, your arguments that standards of democracy in Russia are not different from the norm look rather misinformed.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    25. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides asking him politely to turn it off, getting a lawyer is probably the best thing to do. Trying to disable the device is gonna cost you more if you get caught, and could get you some jail time.

      My lawyer would let me talk to him about it for a small fee - any papers that needed to be filed would of course cost more, but I'd at least have the advice and some direction.

    26. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      File that suggestion under "wallet rape". I just paid £653 inc VAT for an hours consultation and a letter. Now subtly breaking the old bastards noise pollution device would be so much easier. Or call your local Corporation and get him served with an ASBO.

    27. Re:Ask Slashdot? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Neither is that what irony means, nor is that how wonderful is spelled. Also, the word "BLOC" is an acronym, doesn't have a K, and had nothing to do with the laws, so to suggest that our law system is BLOC doesn't actually make sense.

      I'm sure you'll say something nasty about spelling and grammar flames, but really, when your quality of discourse is this low, do you actually expect to be taken seriously? Do you really believe that the two hundred fourty years of our style of government was to make a country that didn't even exist until 1917 look bad? What were the first hundred and thirty years? Practice?

      Bashing the Russians blindly is passe. If you want to sound hot-button and don't know what you're talking about, the current national villain is capital-t Terrorism. You'll need to point your finger at turbans, not red coats. You know, that, or read a book. 'S really up to you.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    28. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the word "BLOC" is an acronym, doesn't have a K, and had nothing to do with the laws, so to suggest that our law system is BLOC doesn't actually make sense.

      Actually, it's from a word in french, 'bloc', which means block or mass. (You may have heard 'en bloc' before). Otherwise, what exactly does the acronym stand for?

      So far it looks like you're going '0 for 2' at being pedantic with language skills.

    29. Re:Ask Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are incorrect. All you have to do is call your local lawyer, file a lawsuite and bring if before a judge. As long as you are respectful towards the judge and have your facts in order, he or she, can order the owner of such a device to turn it off or face contempt charges.

    30. Re:Ask Slashdot? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      In fact, for the state of California, has as part of the bundle of rights of ownership is, "The right to keep others off the property, to ensure a peaceful and quiet space." Renters have this right also. I couldn't find the exact wording over at Arnie's Real Estate web page, but its in my "California Real Estate Princiles" book by Michael Consbruck. I hope Mikey got it right, I'm taking the R.E.Test next month.

  4. Try this by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Take pictures of it. Print out the link you have in your post and any other documentation you can find on the thing. Ask a community service officer from the police to come out. She will probably be a she. She will probably be young, and since not carrying a gun, will not have spent a bunch of time on the firing range ruining her hearing. She will hear it, and since the docs clearly show it is designed to be annoying, she will be on your side. Probably. Maybe. You can try it and hope, anyway.

    Plan B. You like Hendrix, right? With breakfast. Early. Turn it up to eleven.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:Try this by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do it yourself. If you're annoying people, DIY Hendrix is better than recorded. Be sure to wear your American Flag suit when you step out on your back deck to serenade him. An old Heathkit amp with some bad solder joints for extra distortion will help as well.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    2. Re:Try this by Tlosk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There was a piece on NPR radio a few weeks ago about an inventor who is marketing a device similar to the mosquito one in this article only it is specifically desinged to be annoying to teenagers (he had problems with them congregating in front of his store). Amusingly his daughter then subverted it for her own use by creating ringtones of the noise so that she could turn her phone on during school (since vibra mode can still be audible in a quiet classroom) and none of the teachers can hear it even though everyone else can lol.

      They even had the ringtone as a downloadable ringtone there (you can't of course hear it at all if you're over 25 or so, as you age you lose the ability to hear in those outlier frequency ranges).

      Here's a link to the story:

      http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?story Id=5434687

    3. Re:Try this by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Wow, most people can't hear that? I'll be 27 in a couple weeks and that's definitely not even at the top of my hearing range. I guess other people really can't hear when the TV is left on. (As in, when the TV is turned on but in a mode where it's just black - no picture or sound, but giving off a very high buzz that annoys the hell out of me. My husband thinks it's odd that I can tell from the next room that someone left it on, and I think it's odd that he can't.)

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    4. Re:Try this by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or at night, plan a raid, whereby you break the device in such a fashion that all the nice little leds stay on (take out the speaker or whatever makes the noise). This will require a screwdriver and you bringing it back to your place. The old man, never having heard the device doesn't know it is broken and is happy annoying you and you are happy as well. Everybody wins^_^

    5. Re:Try this by fandog · · Score: 2, Funny
      an inventor who is marketing a device [snip] specifically desinged to be annoying to teenagers

      Gee, all you have to do is play light jazz to drive teenagers off... And that solution is <$10. Quite an invention that light jazz.

    6. Re:Try this by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Informative

      I guess other people really can't hear when the TV is left on.

      I can. It's the flyback transformer in your set making that noise - a very loud 15.75 KHz tone. I'm almost 40 years old and haven't taken real good care of my hearing, and it still bugs the hell out of me. One solution to the noise problem is to get a non-CRT television set (plasma, LCD, DLP, etc.).

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    7. Re:Try this by Munchr · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much the same sound made by many brands of audio/video gear when they are operating, and by a few brands even when they are turned OFF. It drives me nuts when I visit my grandparents or my uncle's place. And it's torture walking through electronics stores, although with the prevalence of various flat screen technologies it's not as bad as it used to be. BTW, I'm 29 and still able to clearly hear this tone, as well as a few higher frequencies. I can't wait for them to finally dissapear with age.

    8. Re:Try this by Rudolf · · Score: 1

      How is that different from this thing?

      That's exactly what this is. It's designed to annoy young people and keep them from bothering shopkeepers. There's even a link to ringtones. (Mosquito is the name of the device)

    9. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what you're saying is that I'm not going crazy?

      Well, that's a relief.

    10. Re:Try this by kc8apf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, even the DLP TV I have creates a whine. The power supply for the lamp is more than likely a flyback.

      --
      kc8apf
    11. Re:Try this by FullCircle · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, that recording does actually hurt.

      Thanks, that's the first recording I've heard that is clear enough to understand why teenagers would leave.

      You're right, that's almost like a flyback transformer, but possibly more intense.

      It did make me feel a little better though. I'm working on 40 but that was still clear as a bell.

      --
      If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
    12. Re:Try this by Brett+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm 48 and the flyback transformer on my TV still drives me nuts. My wife can't hear it, but she calls me deaf because I can't hear her [or do I choose not to hear her?].

    13. Re:Try this by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      25?!?

      product I'm 35 and heard it just fine. This product probably discourages a lot of normal business as well.



      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    14. Re:Try this by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Ugh, that sounds exactly like the sound one of my computers has started to make lately.

      I can't figure out what part it is; originally I thought it was some type of mechanical noise because it seems to go on and off from time to time, but I opened up the case and unplugged all the fans and it still does that. Same thing when I disconnect the hard drive. I think it's in the power supply. (I guess the next step is to replace the PS and see if it goes away ... since the sound does go away when I shut the system down.)

      Anyway, I'm not that young and it's like running fingernails down a blackboard to me. I've started keeping that computer turned off because it's so obnoxious to have running; I can only imagine how bad something designed to make that sound could be.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    15. Re:Try this by anagama · · Score: 1

      I have an acer LCD and I can hear the inverter or whatever inside makes a whine. Not anywhere as loud as crt though. A long long time ago, I had a crappy job working in a Juvie detention home. The kids hated me because I could hear the TV from the other side of the building -- they'd try to sneak in some tube time in the hours it was supposed to be off.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    16. Re:Try this by nroose · · Score: 1

      I turned 40 2 months ago. I can hear it. I think someone has their data wrong.

    17. Re:Try this by anagama · · Score: 1

      Sorry to double post but I just listened to that ringtone. I'm almost 38 and it made me cringe and immediately hit pause -- I'm in a noisy room with a computer that has a tiny single unamplified speaker.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    18. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried making sure your mic isn't too near your speaker?

    19. Re:Try this by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      >An old Heathkit amp with some bad solder joints for extra distortion will help as well.

      Anyone with that will also have the requisite ash-fretboard white Strat to really rip the toenails out of it. ('Scuse me while I kiss the sky.)
      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    20. Re:Try this by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Another 35 year old that can hear it just fine. Fortunately I've never encountered it in the wild, but it probably would drive me away as well. Guess my old man was wrong about listening to all that loud HEAVY METAL MUSIC!

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    21. Re:Try this by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Don't be so sure. I'm 34 and can hear it perfectly clearly. When they played it on BBC Radio 4, people in their 60s were calling in saying they can hear it perfectly well.

    22. Re:Try this by Henk+Poley · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's called 'coil noise'. There are a couple of coils (circular wound wires) on the motherboard. Normaly they shouldn't have any room to move a bit, but if they have they will vibrate in their magnetic field. You can use a tube to find the offending coil. Put the tube to your ear and move with the other end over the motherboard until you find the spot that emits the noise. Applying hotglue seems to be the most effective way to cancel the noise.

    23. Re:Try this by Firehed · · Score: 1

      It made me feel better knowing that the speakers in my $2000 laptop aren't total crap, despite what the other end of the audio spectrum indicates.

      Well, until the instant splitting headache. Damned old people and their abuse of inferior hearing.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    24. Re:Try this by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      Oh, you are, but this isn't the proof.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    25. Re:Try this by LiquidAvatar · · Score: 1

      Where are the mod points when I need them! That's fantastic advice.

      --
      It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.
      -Voltaire
    26. Re:Try this by edwazere · · Score: 1

      Of course when playing it on radio4 it went through many, many stages of alteration before reaching the average radio.

      One of the side effects of the compressor and expander that the signal is passed through is to lower the frequency of the high frequency sound.

      --
      -- You ain't seen me, right?
    27. Re:Try this by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Just passed thirty here, and I can hear it. That's really nasty. I would be sympathetic to any kid that actively broke one of these devices. I would recommend first speaking to the neighbour and then calling it into the police first. But you'd be morally entitled to break it, definitely.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    28. Re:Try this by volpe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was about to suggest that but you beat me to it. So let me add a little suggestion: Instead of trying to carefully break the thing in the middle of the night, buy another identical device from wherever he got it (Home Depot, whatever) and take your time breaking it carefully. Then just swap the two in the middle of the night. Then return the properly-functioning one to the store for a refund.

    29. Re:Try this by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      will not have spent a bunch of time on the firing range ruining her hearing.

      Or you could buy a gun and spend a lot of time firing it at the old man - ruining your hearing and also removing him from the equation at the time.. Better yet, spend a lot of time shooting at the device.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    30. Re:Try this by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Brilliant - utterly brilliant! And with even a little planning, getting in and out of the house unnoticed ought to be possible.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    31. Re:Try this by skam240 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or at night, plan a raid, whereby you break the device in such a fashion that all the nice little leds stay on...

      Screw that. I'd just head over there at 3 in the morning and smash it with a hammer (and I'm dead serious for those looking to mod this funny). I've had to deal with people of this sort in dealing with my condo association and let me tell you, there are certain segments of the elderly who literally hate everyone. Given that the police will do nothing about this, the only option is to take things into your own hands. These units are fairly expensive and some one on a limited budget (such as your typical elderly neighbor) will likely not have the resources to replace such a device. I would Hop the fence at three in the morning and anything that looked like it might be emitting the sound would be either stolen or smashed.

      For anyone who has moral concerns over smashing the property of an elderly person, said person should take into consideration the fact that this elderly person has installed a device which targets young neighbors regardless of their actions or behavior. Punishing all individuals of a given group regardless of guilt is certainly immoral. Furthermore, said elderly neighbor has plenty of options through the local police department in dealing with disturbances and has no right to take things into their own hands

      Given that the police will do nothing about this, one has no option but to take things into ones own hands.

      Of course if you choose this course of action you should be careful in doing so and recongnize the fact that it is illegal. I'm really just saying what I would personally do and not necessarily what you should do.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    32. Re:Try this by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

      If that doesn't work, smash the shit out of it with a baseball bat. This is the approach I'd take as I tend to have a really short fuse when it comes to noise issues.

      There is some asshole with one of these devices that about kills me when I ride my bike past it on the way to work. I've thought about this just having to pass it...I'd be dead serious about it if it were my next door neighbor. It fucking hurts.

      If you get caught and end up in court, you've got an excellent defense of temporary insanity due to the device. Have your attorney insist use a hearing test to find potential jurors.

    33. Re:Try this by 70Bang · · Score: 0

      If this breaks the page, it won't be by much. If you are modding - read it all, okay?

      I'll be forty-five come April Fool's Day and I can hear it quite well despite severe tinnitus (concussion from a car accident twelve years ago), tv playing, and a noisy ceiling fan. My eyes, however, have hit the 40-year marker and I do have to use reading glasses. The doc said I used them too much by learning to read when I was two.

      There's something which might be worth sharing in return and there's nothing noxious about it...i.e.directly. My parents had a sizeable piece of property and Japanese beetles were a problem (they owned a lot of trees which which the landscaper didn't recommend using anything noxious because there were dozens of trees, not to mention he had a pretty green approach to things. His recommendation was to use Japanese beetle traps. (The nasty part is when the bags are full you use twisty-ties or some other method to close off the bag and toss them into the trash - after a day or two, they'd start to smell like rotting meat.)

      The cool part about whatever brand they were using at the time is the lure. (or lures, if you want to consider both genders) For the most part, you couldn't really smell the pheromone strip(s) unless yyou had them pretty close to your nose and they were very pleasant. (I think you can guess where this is going) Carefully positioned on a porch, inside a car whose windows are occasionally left with any type of opening, a house window (minus screen) left open, etc. If the beetles are around (I'm guessing the forces of nature could cause this to be easily measured in hundreds of yards), you could cause an invasion of some type. Whether the mosquito nuisance would have an effect is an exercise left to the reader.

      About fifteen years ago, we had a neighbor problem who claimed our dogs were causing all sorts of problems. We finally resolved it before the zoning board (her loss). Unfortunately, she died before everything had a chance to cool down (2-3 years) with us and they were after someone else - this was a hobby of hers. Lots of time, nothing [else] to do. I learned from a "life of crime" in college (a book in and of itself) it was better to do something in return while the griddle was hot (with someone else) as most people aren't snipers (one event and they're done) and they figure if it's not the current situation, they don't know which of their previous opponents it is, particularly if you're somewhere in the middle). I had a long list of things waiting for her, things I knew worked from college as well as other things which were on permanent mental filing. But alas, she just sneaked off in the middle of the night.

      Now, for the mature side:

      You can start by sending a 3rd party representing your position, but without betraying who you are - he probably knows, if he's doing it to annoy you. If the message is to pound sand, find out what the local ordinances are with regard to noise...and monitor his nocturnal schedule. If you can shorten his sleep cycles considerably - you mentioned there were a number of you, so you aren't going to go 1::1 in a test of endurance, you can wear him down. Be nice about it. Schedule some [very early, but legal] "Early Bird" breakfast picnics (with appropriate audio entertainment, especially if it's from his era (you are being benevolent, right?) whose timing is appropriate for your locale and send him an invitation (literally) occasionally. If problems ensue, you can provide a copy and show you were trying to be a good neighbor by inviting him. Got a friend he's never seen before? Have them get him up at oh-dark-00 and ring his bell until he answers and ask for directions to find one of you.

      Big tip: the best way to beat the system is to play by the system. There are always exceptions or conflicts which create opportunities for leverage.

    34. Re:Try this by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      Nobody in their right mind would use ash for a fretboard. It's too soft and porous.

    35. Re:Try this by Elemenope · · Score: 1

      Perhaps even legally entitled. If you are walking along on a public sidewalk and one of these devices is activated, you can hear it, and it causes you pain, that's an assault in progress. You are legally (in most places) allowed to use force in self-defense to terminate an attack on your person.

      IANAL, and this is not legal advice.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    36. Re:Try this by bishop186 · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying while it might be legal, you do not support the idea of barging in the old man's house in full Twisted Sister gear and attacking the Mosquito with an axe (whether I mean one with strings or one made of pointy metal is up to your interpretation).

    37. Re:Try this by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      not everyone loses that hearing range as they age. I can still pick out frequencies at and around 40Khz MAny times I will be amnnoyed at someone's TV as I can hear the flyback transformer or I can pick out the high freq tone from something. My dog's anti-bark boxes in the back yard I can hear inside, I can also hear the mosquito and bug chasers.

      I am 38 years old today, and can hear them as well as I could at 17.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    38. Re:Try this by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For anyone who has moral concerns over smashing the property of an elderly person, said person should take into consideration the fact

      Blahblahblah.. 2 wrongs don't make a right.

    39. Re:Try this by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
      I'm 37 and it annoyed the piss out of me. I invited my 34 year old wife to listen.

      "Do you hear that?"

      "Hear what?"

      "That really high-pitched tone!"

      "I don't hear anything!"

      "That tone!"

      "Have you been reading Slashdot again?"

      Then again, she's a teacher, so she's not supposed to hear it.

      Dammit. My speakers were still set to drunk-guy-listening-to-Ministry volume levels. Ten seconds of high-amplitude mosquito noise and my ears still hurt.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    40. Re:Try this by fuzzix · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm 35 and heard it just fine. This product probably discourages a lot of normal business as well.
      I wonder if the fact that there was MP3 compression applied effected the sound. I'd rather hear an uncompressed version to be sure that I wasn't just perceiving some mpeg artefact.
    41. Re:Try this by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Same here, I can hear it perfectly and i'm pushing 30. Likewise with my wife who's about 5 years older.

      The inventor's apparent assumption that all non-teenagers have been stupid (or unlucky) enough to damage their hearing enough to avoid his device is just a liiiiitle bit flawed. After listening to the recording, I have to applaud the submitter's restraint, I probably would have gone crazy and snuck over at night to dismantle the thing after a few days of putting up with that whine.

      Not to mention the fact that it would annoy the hell out of our cats as well - I don't buy the inventor's assertion that they'd just ignore the sound.

    42. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The old don't tend to sleep well.
      The old are rumored to favor shotguns loaded with rock salt.
      The old are generally sympathetic figures to those of us who don't deal with them every day.

      You are a snot-nosed young'un who's hopping a fence at 3am with a deadly weapon, and just stupid enough to admit that you were planning to vandalize a particular old person's house.

      This could go very, very badly for you.

      I should know. I'm 35 and I already own the shotgun.

    43. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They's likely be up by 3am...Your best bet is closer to midnight.

    44. Re:Try this by Manchot · · Score: 1

      While you're at it, make a recording of the device. When you call the police about it, if they can't hear the recording or the device itself, play it back in slow motion. Assuming that the microphone can pick up frequencies that high, when you play it back in slow motion, there's a good chance that they'll be able to hear it.

    45. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I can hear some sort of whine even in my LCD's. It's not the power supplies (which are on the ground), something in the display.

      Annoying. My laptop also whines. Ugh, I hate that crap.

    46. Re:Try this by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Though I do occasionally get ringing in my ears when I -know- it's 100% silent (so annoying), I've got pretty good hearing anyway. Right now I've got a high-pitched buzz from my monitor, and one from my computer, and one from my TV :( I can't fall asleep with the TV on unless I'm -dead- tired.

      Interestingly enough, I downloaded the sound from that NPR story.. it sounded lower-pitched than a TV's whine. More annoying, though.. it sounded sour, whereas a TV's whine is just sharp.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    47. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Simply unplug it and place it conveniently behind a tire of their car for safekeeping.

    48. Re:Try this by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      The police are far more likely to take action in the case of felony vandalism and trespass.

      Follow the parent's advice and you could wind up in jail.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    49. Re:Try this by thewiz · · Score: 1

      (you can't of course hear it at all if you're over 25 or so, as you age you lose the ability to hear in those outlier frequency ranges).

      I'm 40 and can hear those "mosquito" devices. They're extremely annoying and it is the only sound I've run across that actually makes my migraines worse.
      Personally, I consider the devices to be in violation of "noise pollution" laws.

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    50. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > there are certain segments of the elderly who literally hate everyone

      It is comforting to know that you too will join that segment of the population. Judging from your post, it will happen sooner that you think. For we all grow old, that is a given, but crabby geezers were once obnoxious youngsters in their prime.

    51. Re:Try this by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Furthermore, said elderly neighbor has plenty of options through the local police department in dealing with disturbances and has no right to take things into their own hands.

      But you just advocated vigilante actions when it doesn't appear that all legal options have been exhausted. Not only did at least one poster suggest other options through the police, there is the community government as well.

    52. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you're modding the thing, insert a little circuit board containing a transmitter that pumps out a watt or two of totally filthy carrier over, say, 121.5 MHz. (Do it "right" and it can also spread the love over most of the ATC frequencies at the same time.)

      Then watch the FAA, etc. come a-callin'.

    53. Re:Try this by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

      Wrong! They do, in nearly all cases.

      --
      Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    54. Re:Try this by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      "(you can't of course hear it at all if you're over 25 or so, as you age you lose the ability to hear in those outlier frequency ranges)."

      I'm old enough to have children who are over 25*, and I heard that painfully clearly. I'll probably lose that range eventually, but you really gotta stop believing that "everyone older than me is decrepit" nonsense.

      *Except that I was doing it with guys. :)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    55. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Very well stated. But I suspect the main goal is to pester the old geezer. Some kids do pester old geezers, intentionally or not, just as some old geezers pester young ones. Perhaps the police responded as they did because they've gotten numerous calls from the geezer, complaining about actions of the young folks, and the police said basically they couldn't do anything unless caught in the act. (I've no idea what is really going on, just as most readers don't...I'm just giving a possible alternative view.)

      Finally, this sort of thing RARELY comes out of the blue.(although that's possible) Often it's the result of a relationship in which people have consistently been less than good neighbors. Reading the suggestions of those who think destroying the individual's property, including car, etc., I suspect a lot of folks are bringing their frustrations with others to their advice.

      As to cranking up Hendrix, depending on how old he is, he might be happy for the "Oldies night." He'd probably hate rap more. But, then again, so might your other neighbors. And his hearing, as mentioned, is probably not as acute as yours, so it would probably damage the ears of younger folks more than older ones. Note: This does not apply to those who have already damaged their ears using iPods or other "personal" music players, if used as eardrum destructive devices.(playing them loudly) Hmmm, maybe a good common ground might be, "Which audiologist do you use?"

      If, indeed, the original poster wanted the problem handled, perhaps the innocent young folks should find a young person the geezer likes, and have a dialog begun about how to improve your relationships. Often people have no clue that something they are doing is bothering someone else. (witness cell phone conversations, where the talker is louder than the speech of people nearby.

    56. Re:Try this by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

      They even had the ringtone as a downloadable ringtone there (you can't of course hear it at all if you're over 25 or so, as you age you lose the ability to hear in those outlier frequency ranges).

      Well, I must have dog hearing, because I'm 33 and could hear it. And it's incredibly annoying (as in painful to my ears). The funny thing is, I spent my younger years listening to rock music cranked up as loud as it would go, and used to frequently work on racecar engines without ear protection. My wife thinks I'm half-deaf, but it must just be the lower frequencies that I can't hear as well.

    57. Re:Try this by ATMD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Happy birthday!

      --
      Nobody else has this sig.
    58. Re:Try this by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They do, in nearly all cases.

      Only for those who disregard the consequences.

      Creating a bigger monster to fight a monster will work for fighting the monster.. Only problem is you are now left with a bigger monster then what you started out with, hence having made the situation worse, not better, despite the original 'monster' being gone.

    59. Re:Try this by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Guess my old man was wrong about listening to all that loud HEAVY METAL MUSIC!

      Yes, he was. The real culprit in age related hearing loss is that factory. THE FACTORY. THE FACTORY! I SAID... WHAT?

      Note the cops can't hear it, even the young ones. Hunters would be the same way. Anything that makes your ears ring (let alone hurt) damages them.

      Young Nascar drivers (and those who spectate weekly) won't hear it either.

      If you're playing in the band and you have nightly gigs, the metal (or any other genre; drums are LOUD) will screw up your hearing.

      Construction workers go deaf too.

      If you wonder why women make less money than men but have a longer lifespan, it's because the dirty dangerous jobs women refuse to take pay more. It's also the reason the lady above could hear the flyback transformer but her husband can't.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    60. Re:Try this by x-guru · · Score: 1

      My story actually *is* funny. Well, funny in a deeply introspective way when analyzing my own irrational behavior.

      My house was about 150 feet from a main road with a small commercial strip mall. There was a dry-cleaner in the mall with a faulty burglar alarm BEHIND the building facing the residential neighborhood that I lived in.

      For three nights in a row the entire neighborhood was awakened at 3:00 AM to the blaring sound of this obnoxious alarm. Each night, I stood in my front doorway peering out at two or three other neighbors in their bathrobes and pajamas doing the same thing as we all waited for the police to come shut off the alarm.

      It was the third night, and I had it! It is amazing what three sleepless nights in a row will do to a man's sanity. At 3:15 AM I grabbed a hammer, a big hammer, and, in my bathrobe, walked down to the house on the end of the street. I opened the fence, nodding to the owner who was standing on the front porch. He nodded back as I walked to his back-yard and climbed the wall. I leaned over the wall, which put me right at eye-level with the alarm's loudspeaker, and with the hammer, I beat the bloody piss out of the alarm. As the whirling siren popped and grunted and faded it sounded like a Hollywood sound effect.

      And then there was silence.

      As I emerged from the neighbors yard and walked back up the street, I was literally greeted with the sound of applause and cheers. Even the ultra-conservative 70-year old cuban guy across the street was yelling his gratitude.

      To this day, three years later, I get a little adrenaline rush and a jolt of satisfaction at having taken matters into my own hands and having personally enhanced the lives of several families. If there is something you can do, do it!

      --x

    61. Re:Try this by bhmit1 · · Score: 1
      Or at night, plan a raid, whereby you break the device in such a fashion that all the nice little leds stay on...
      Screw that. I'd just head over there at 3 in the morning and smash it with a hammer
      You are all making this too hard and you don't want to be caught trespassing at 3am. Try this:
      1. It's outdoors
      2. It's electrical
      3. You probably have a garden hose
      Just try not to electrocute yourself in the process, ok? And it wouldn't hurt to wait for the old fart to leave so that the evidence has dried up. Odds are that if it's a decent outdoor outlet, the GFI will pop. And if it's not so decent, or non-existent, the circuit breaker will trip eventually.
    62. Re:Try this by choiceaxiom · · Score: 1

      How about talking to him? Here are the tools might want to consider using: http://cnvc.org/ tutorial: http://www.nvctraining.com/free-class.html Seems _very_ contrived/corny . . . but it works in almost any communication.

    63. Re:Try this by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      > One solution to the noise problem is to get a non-CRT television set (plasma, LCD, DLP, etc.).

      Not necessarily. My LCD TV in my bedroom makes way more high pitched noise at far greater volume than my normal CRT ever did. It depends which one you buy. I eventually realised it was just the power supply so I installed that in the loft/roofspace and wall-mounted the TV. Problem solved.

    64. Re:Try this by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      My eyes, however, have hit the 40-year marker and I do have to use reading glasses. The doc said I used them too much by learning to read when I was two.

      Get a different eye doctor, yours is a quack. Everyone needs reading glasses if they live long enough. It's usually between 40 and 50, and your reading had nothing to do with it. In middle age the eye's focusing lens (behind the iris) gradually hardens, so you can't focus any more.

      This can be fixed. However, at $7500 per eye it's pretty expensive, but if you can develop cataracts then insurance will cover all but a couple grand per eye. It's called a CrystaLens; they stick a needle in your eye, suck out the lens, and replace it with the implant. It's brand new, only FDA approved in 2003.

      I had my left eye done last month, and it's amazing. I'm 54 and was using contact lenses for my lifelong 20-400 nearsightedness AND reading glasses for my age related farsightedness. My left eye is now 20-16 (that's better than 20-20) and in good light I can read the date on a dime, without glasses! I've never been able to see this good before, even with corrective lenses.

      My other eye's lens hasn't become opaque enough for insurance to help yet, the doctor says a year or two. So, I have time to save up another two grand for the other eye, and still use a contact lens in that one.

      Oh yeah, you can give yourself cataracts with steroid eye drops like prednisolone.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    65. Re:Try this by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      What if the old coot's intent is to CAUSE exactly this type of escalaton?
      Here in the US, you can kill people for invading your home.

      The old coot could be sleeping with a shotgun full of rocksalt, or worse.
      Or he might have a camera on it so he can have the kid arrested for trespassing.

      Sometimes it takes a lawyer to get the police to do their job. That's the reason nuisances are tolerated in some neighborhoods more than others... poor people don't get lawyers (unless there's a jackpot involved, or an especially idealist young lawyer who doesn't need to eat or anything).

    66. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blahblahblah, a witty saying proves nothing. Try saying something meaningful next time.

    67. Re:Try this by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Odd, I can't hear the Mosquito sound, but the TV flyback I can hear fine. Must be poor speakers/headphones on my computer.

    68. Re:Try this by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      There was a piece on NPR radio a few weeks ago about an inventor who is marketing a device similar to the mosquito one in this article only it is specifically desinged to be annoying to teenagers

      That's not similar to this device, that IS this device. That's what his elderly neighbor put up.

    69. Re:Try this by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      there are certain segments of the elderly who literally hate everyone.

      there are certain segments of the young who literally hate everyone, too. These young assholes either grow up to be old assholes, get killed, or mellow out and change their ways. But most of the elderly who hate everyone always hated everyone.

      Assholes come in all sizes, shapes, colors, and ages.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    70. Re:Try this by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      2 wrongs don't make a right.

      Maybe not, but three lefts do.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    71. Re:Try this by kirun · · Score: 1

      I get the same thing with mains-powered clock radio alarms - I can't have one in my room and therefore use a small travel clock instead.

      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
    72. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 37 and can still hear this tone. I can hear the ringtones...I control the house's firewall... Oh man are my kids SCREWED!!!

    73. Re:Try this by jone1941 · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that battles fought without a concequence of death are almost always fun. There is a reason we have snowball fights as children and play semi-violent sports as you adults. Neighborhood battles are just one of the many fun things adults do with their time. Or do you just walk around battling your inner deamons?

      --
      Fear trumps hope and ignorance trumps both
    74. Re:Try this by drsquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Destroying a device put there for the sole purpose of causing people misery is not a wrong.

    75. Re:Try this by anti_analog · · Score: 1

      I just downloaded that ringtone, and even on my laptops crappy speakers at low volume I found it to be piercingly loud and annoying at the ripe old age of 26. I guess I'm not surpised I can hear it, since when I visit my parents large house I can tell if they have the TV on by the time I get to the front door (tv is at the back of the slightly large house). As a kid I was always suprised other's, even many young people, didn't notice that noise.
      I'm not sure why kids would want that as a ringtone, since it's not like having a secret ringtone makes it any easier to secretly talk on the phone I guess a more discreet alarm for incoming text messages may be more "practical", but a discerning teacher would be able to notice kids texting by, you know, looking and noticing.

      Anyway, back to the Mosquito device, I'm sure if it can be found, it can be simply sabotaged. I'm sure the little speaker wouldn't work too well if it had, say, superglue or something caked onto it, and unless it's sophisticated enough to notice that it's been tampered with and flash an error code or something, since the old fart using it can't here it, he'd be none the wiser.

      --
      you cannot dodge the quad laser. jumping is useless.
    76. Re:Try this by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      You aren't alone.

      Despite being a metalhead in HS, in my mid 30's I can still stand outside my nephew's "computer room" at school and tell you how many CRTs are on inside. One is a clear tone, two is a dissonant but stable tone, three is a jumbled dissonance.

      I WISH I couldn't hear that. But I can. I can hear a camera charging for flash from across the street too.

    77. Re:Try this by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah really, I still can't shop for TVs in person without getting all twitchy.
      I dunno, at least here in the US, one could request accomodations. Of course it
      really shouldn't be necessary. What is worse is when the monitors are in public
      places.

      In the case of the problem at hand, file a harassment complaint with the police.
      It isn't the job of the officer to decide whether or not it is harassment, just
      to determine the facts in the matter. In all likely hood getting a summons from
      the local DA's office will stop this behavior.

      Otherwise, if the police are not taking it seriously you can always complain to
      the local oversight board about them not properly investigating the problem.

    78. Re:Try this by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      She won't hear it unless she's under 20. The submitter is lying when he says it's annoying people up to 40. Which makes me think that he *IS* an annoying teenager, and the guy with the Mosquito probably has good reason.

    79. Re:Try this by SC_shooter · · Score: 1

      I am an old guy but I prefer a 3" magnum turkey load with #4 shot in my 12 gauge. But that's just me. Since I'm old and easily confused, I might accidently pick up my AR or maybe the 1911.

    80. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Plan B. You like Hendrix, right? With breakfast. Early. Turn it up to eleven."

      Um, where do you live where old people haven't been up for hours already in the morning?

    81. Re:Try this by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      MP3 introduces artifacts. I'm 41 and I can hear that MP3 whine. But the actual mosquito device itself I wouldn't be able to hear. That's set to a frequency that people stop hearing around 20 years old.

    82. Re:Try this by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

      Plan B. You like Hendrix, right? With breakfast. Early. Turn it up to eleven.

      Except most old folks these days also like Hendrix! With breakfast even. They don't even hear it unless it is up to eleven!

      Of course you could always try... Standing up next to a mozzie-repeller, and chopping it down with the edge of your hand!!!

    83. Re:Try this by nsayer · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you remember Heathkit, then you're more likely in the old coot's camp than in the kids'.

    84. Re:Try this by Alchemar · · Score: 1

      "2 wrong don't make a right"? I hear this statement often, and am completely amazed at how many people never think about it long enough to realize that it does not hold true. The time that I heard it most was usually in school for fighting. I was the school neard, and got picked on a LOT, but would try to defend myself when warrented. The school was unable to keep the other kids off of me, and when I asked I was told that I needed to learn to defend myself. When I did this is the statement that I got. Then it hit me. I asked the principle to grab a student out of the hall and bust him instead of me. He told me that wasn't right. But busting me is right? Yes, because you did something wrong. So me doing something wrong, makes you doing someing wrong right?
      All forms of punishment would be inherently wrong if used on someone that did not do something wrong first. Anything the goverment could do to solve the problem with the high pitch speaker would be considered wrong unless it was determined the old neighbor was doing something wrong first. It might be uncivilized to take the law into your own hands, but that is a far cry from "2 wrongs don't make a right"

    85. Re:Try this by nsayer · · Score: 1

      It's more likely to be the bearings on the color wheel. When we bought our DLP set, it had a terrible whine, just like a bad hard drive. They came out and replaced the entire light engine and it went away.

    86. Re:Try this by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Right you are. Ash body; maple neck. Back in the day, my rocker buddies always claimed the Strats with the light colored fretboards played better than the ones with the dark necks. I never played well enough to feel the difference. Great sound either way.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    87. Re:Try this by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that battles fought without a concequence of death are almost always fun.

      Not really, but battles without serious consequences can be a lot of fun.

      There is a reason we have snowball fights as children and play semi-violent sports as you adults. Neighborhood battles are just one of the many fun things adults do with their time.

      It is fun untill it gets out of hand.

      There is a reason why any such games as you talk about have a set of rules attached to them, either implicitly (snowball fights) or explicitly (most 'violent' sports and games)

      Or do you just walk around battling your inner deamons?

      It would give most a bigger job then they can handle in their lifetime, but taking on the biggest ones (bias in judgement and greed to just name a few) might be a very good idea indeed.

      You won't survive without knowing how to fight, but neither will you if fighting is your answer before exhausting any other options.

    88. Re:Try this by ChronosWS · · Score: 1

      Just remember, what is legal and what is right are often not the same things, especially in our litigous society. Do what is right, always. If it happens to also be legal, that just means people won't bother you for it. It sounds like this person is deliberately being annoying, and you should take specifically limited action to correct that, assuming you have exhausted less intrusive options like asking him nicely to remove it or offering to attempt to correct what he perceives to be the annoying things being done by the local teenagers.

    89. Re:Try this by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Defending yourself is not wrong untill the moment you use 'disproportional means'. Without keeping that in mind, people will use your reasoning as a 'good reason' to kill someone who happened to commit some minor wrong against them.

      That will put an end to crime so is a good idea you say?

      I suggest you go look a bit at how often throughout history that has been proven wrong, for the exact reason that 2 wrongs do not make a right.

    90. Re:Try this by DestroyAllZombies · · Score: 1

      Count your blessings. 46 and no reaction at all. My 8-year old daughter got a kick out of it, though. I'm sure she's hatching plans right now since I explained the whole thing to her (better to raise a pain in the ass than a well-behaved sheep).

      But I still got the instant headache, so maybe it wasn't a complete waste of time.

      --
      This login name for sale.
    91. Re:Try this by _el_tuki_ · · Score: 1

      I have the same problem, my mom and dad don't notice the sound the TV makes when it's turned on even though it's pretty obvious for me (I'm on my 20s). One time I went to another room and had them turn the TV on/off and then change the channels with the remote (volume muted), I detected each time they turned the TV off/on and each channel change just based on the sound, they were shocked. Then my sister (even younger) did the same thing and we figured it hould be a hearing/age problem.

    92. Re:Try this by 2muchcoffeeman · · Score: 1
      They even had the ringtone as a downloadable ringtone there (you can't of course hear it at all if you're over 25 or so, as you age you lose the ability to hear in those outlier frequency ranges).

      I remember that story and downloaded the ringtone to check it out. That noise is downright painful.

      And I'll turn 39 in December. So much for "you can't of course hear it at all if you're over 25 or so."

      --
      Prevent Windows piracy. Use Linux instead.
    93. Re:Try this by Invidious · · Score: 1

      2 wrongs do not always make a right, but they often do. The thing is just what you said: it needs to be a proportionate response. In this case, I think that taking a hammer to a device designed solely to annoy all of those within a certain demographic within and beyond its range is an entirely proportionate response.

    94. Re:Try this by Tack · · Score: 1

      Download audacity and recreate it. I assume it's just a sine wave at about 15KHz.

    95. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better to raise a pain in the ass than a well-behaved sheep

      you're the only other person I've ever met who shares that sentiment.

    96. Re:Try this by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      I always figured people who designed TV's were sexist, especially after becoming an EE myself and learning a lot of the faulty assumptions about normal hearing that men in the field take for granted. When "instant on" became popular, that meant the TV was really always on, it only looks like it's off. Me, I just plug the TV into an outlet controlled by a wall switch and use that to turn it off. I'm too young to remember what women were like before television, but I wouldn't be surprised if they became a tad **** afterwards. Thankfully, newer televisions aren't as loud when turned off. Or maybe it's because I'm older.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    97. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How about LEAVE THE OLD MAN ALONE!
      Get out of his yard.
      Those devices have limited range, the only reason you are hearing it is because you are trespassing.

    98. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I see any reason to further the discussion...since I do mostly agree with you...but what exactly are the implicit rules of a snowball fight?

    99. Re:Try this by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Plenty of people over 25 can hear that noise. Its an urban myth that they can't.

    100. Re:Try this by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      I think that taking a hammer to a device designed solely to annoy all of those within a certain demographic within and beyond its range is an entirely proportionate response.

      I disagree. You escalate from annoying eachother to damaging property. You should always let the other party escalate unless you can be absolutely sure your escalation is going to resolve the problem completely.

      As others suggested, stopping it from operating while not destroying it seems entirely proportionate however...

    101. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2 wrongs don't make a right.
      But two Wrights made an airplane...
    102. Re:Try this by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Implicit rules for a snowball fight?

      You throw snowballs, not other stuff. Usually you actually throw them at eachother, you stop when someone might get hurt (beyond being a bit cold from the snow)... Beyond that, it might depend on whom you are whith, but not much :)

      Anyway.. you are right, no point in arguing since we basicly agree.

      The point was that neighborhood battles can be fun as long as both parties decide on roughly the same kind of 'rules', otherwise they usually get out of control after some time. A good way to deal with them is to organize some kind of neighborhood competition instead... Keeps people busy and makes sure there are some rules that all have to agree with in order to participate.

    103. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 31 and man that noise is annoying. I guess I still have good hearing even with all my years of metal music. Maybe it has kept me young? :P

    104. Re:Try this by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      How is that going to make the monster bigger? You break the fucker, the old fart can't replace it, or if he does you break the next one. Sooner or later the problem will go away because at a 1000 bucks a pop the old goat will sooner or later run out of money.

      The only problem I see is people getting caught doing it. That is why I say you dress in black with a black hood. Come over the fence from a different angle from where you live, beat the fucker with a hammer, then leave in a different direction. For even better results you can leave the battered carcase of the damn thing on his porch so he'll get the message.

      If you can't get close enough to hit it with a hammer then think pellet gun. Almost completely silent, none traceable, and will do the job just fine. A shot through the speaker cone or the power supply should do it. Make sure you are a good shot though because you only want to take one shot. While they are silent they are not completely noiseless, but its almost impossible to trace the sound of a single gun shot.

      As for the moral qualms, the old fucker didn't have any qualms about putting the fucker up. Sometimes violence is the only answer and morals are a thing best put on the shelf for a while.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    105. Re:Try this by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Though I do occasionally get ringing in my ears when I -know- it's 100% silent (so annoying),

      That's probably your brain getting bored. Apparently, a full sensory deprivation tank can give you all sorts of hallucinations.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    106. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Since it is just a high frequency sound wave, then there aren't any compression artifacts--the frequency transform will output all zeros except at the one high frequency. The quantizer (the lossy step) will get something that is already nearly all zeros, and so has nothing to quantize. Then the entropy coder does it's job, which is lossless anyway.

      This is just about the perfect sound to run through MP3 compression.

    107. Re:Try this by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      I'm 24 and my eardrums are hurting a minute later.

      --
      Be relentless!
    108. Re:Try this by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I'm 52, and still hear flybacks and other oscillators.

      Flat-panels don't use a flyback the same way analog sets do, but they have switching power supplies that are the equivalent.

      But I usually only hear only those sets with loose cores, or defective transformers. It's very rare anyone hears a properly functioning analog flyback, though I guess some do.

      For the trivia buffs, NTSC (American sets mostly) use 15,734Hz for the interval, It was 15,750Hz until color came along. and it's documented as such in many references. PAL (Britain, Germnany, and others) use 15,625Hz, and SECAM (Used by the French just to piss us off, and others for mostly the same reason) also uses 15,625Hz.

      TV history is fascinating. Then again, I might be a geek's geek.

      rick

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    109. Re:Try this by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      How is that going to make the monster bigger?

      Because destruction of property is a higher level of escalation then trying to annoy eachother?

      Sometimes violence is the only answer and morals are a thing best put on the shelf for a while.

      What escapes you is that you can use violence without putting morals on the shelf for a while. Anytime you can't, your problem is much more likely rejecting non violent solutions then there being none.

    110. Re:Try this by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Bullshit!

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    111. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you can't hear this, try playing it on another set of speakers. I'm not quite 27, and I've always had good high-range hearing, but I was surprised when I couldn't hear this tone when played through my soundsticks (those weird clear plastic things that were all the rage at Apple stores a few years back). I tried it on a pair of headphones and nearly had a heart attack.

    112. Re:Try this by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that goes for thinking of using Hendrix as well.

      On the other hand, haven't you gone dumpster-diving recently? We cleaned out an old lab a year ago (group finally moved elsewhere), and found a Heathkit stereo receiver underneath some manila folders. Sounded just as "home-built by undergrad physics major" as it did when new, probably.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    113. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can still pick out frequencies at and around 40Khz

      Lumpy, you're full of shit. You couldn't have just exaggerated; you had to give yourself double the accepted range of human hearing...

    114. Re:Try this by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Mr. Farnsworth. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    115. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 2 wrongs don't make a right.

      Yes they do. Hezbollah killed some Israelis, and so Israel killed some Lebanese children (and is trying to starve out a couple hundred thousand Lebanese). Those two wrongs together, somehow, make a right -- the US gov't says they do.

    116. Re:Try this by skam240 · · Score: 1

      God bless gun owners. Capital punishment for petty vandalism dished out by any ignorant joe. I love America.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    117. Re:Try this by skam240 · · Score: 2

      The article states that they've already tried going through the police with no success. My statement was made with the assumption that they has persued all avenues along this path.

      In regards to community government, trying to get anything out of them for something as small as this would take months. Months of enduring a horrible high pitch sound while trying to relaxe in their yard.

      The only time efficient solution I could come with for if I was in that situation would be to go over there and smash it.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    118. Re:Try this by skam240 · · Score: 1

      What are we playing Magic the Gathering here?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    119. Re:Try this by Sir+Holo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder if the fact that there was MP3 compression applied effected the sound. I'd rather hear an uncompressed version to be sure that I wasn't just perceiving some mpeg artefact.

      No chance of it being an artifact. It's a single-frequency tone, so the MP3 version is loss-less. MP3 throws out the quieter frequency bands to get a file down to the desired bandwidth or "size." This sound has no quieter frequencies, just the one, so nothing is thrown out, hence no artifacts.

    120. Re:Try this by slimey_limey · · Score: 2

      But most MP3 compressors will throw out higher frequencies to gain better encoding quality at the lower, more audible frequencies. Remember that many engineers are over 25. :)

    121. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor does one wrong make a right. Some of us believe in an equitable distribution of misery, that's all.

    122. Re:Try this by j_rhoden · · Score: 1

      It's basically Rosewood Vs. maple. I like the Rosewood, but it's really just a personal preference.

    123. Re:Try this by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      This is just about the perfect sound to run through MP3 compression.

      And this would be the perfect album to run through MP3 compression, if only players could play it back gapless.

    124. Re:Try this by ichin4 · · Score: 1

      I wish slashdot had a +6 extra-brilliant mod. That is ingenious!

    125. Re:Try this by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Ah, did you even bother reading half the posts in here? That's a complete fallacy-- there are a LOT of older people who CAN still hear it. Besides, at the range that thing has it could probably cross halfway into any neighbor's house depending on where you put it.

    126. Re:Try this by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      "IT" being what? Don't confuse the Mosquito device with an MP3 ring tone. They are not the same. The MP3 ring tone is a single tone. The Mosquito is several tones, all higher than the ring tone. Also the MP3 compression, or the speakers in your computer can introduce harmonics that may be what is heard. The ring tone I can hear and I'm 41. The Mosquito can't be heard by people of my age.

      Yes, I've read half the posts in here, and I'm disappointed in the lack of thinking by supposed geeks.

    127. Re:Try this by Invidious · · Score: 1

      Eeh, that's still destruction of property. My method's simply more dramatic, and cathartic. ;)

      Consider if you lived next-door to this person, and could hear the noise -all day-. That whining would drive me absolutely nuts within the span of a day, and would probably keep me from sleeping. If you fed this into a prison cell, it'd be classified as torture.

    128. Re:Try this by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I am almost 38, and I have absolutely NO trouble hearing that sound. It is horrible and very annoying, even at low volumes. If a neighbor intentionally installed such a device and it could be heard from my yard, then I would consider it asault and would have no guilt sneaking over and destroying the unit in such a way that he would not know it no longer worked.

      Now, what about the other annoying sounds neighbors make? Loud music (especially bass), constant dog barking, car horns for no reason, motorcycles with illegally modified (absent) exhaust systems, basketball thumping over and over for hours... they are all "wrong", but at least it is not intentionally done to annoy.

    129. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just listened to this and I can hear it, 41 years old.

      On a side note I played this on my laptop and my cat was asleep next to me. He woke up and you can tell he did not like the sound. I played it again and moved the laptop closer to him and his eyes got real bit, swatted the laptop, and then ran off.

      So I guess that this would work for cats also. :)

    130. Re:Try this by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      It is lower than a TV's whine. The tone is exactly 15kHz. As others have pointed out, TVs are 15.7kHz. So this tone is like the flat soprano version of TV tone. "Going sour" is a good way to put it.

      I have serious doubts about anybody using these as their cell-phone ringer. Most of those cell speakers don't reproduce frequencies that high.

    131. Re:Try this by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      Actually, the speakers in your laptop probably are total crap. You've already alluded to the fact that they have no low range. And that's fine, because who would fit anything but a set of tweeters in a laptop shell... but let me tell you, those tweeters probably suck. Just cause they can make the frequencies doesn't mean they make them all evenly at the same level.

    132. Re:Try this by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      Dude, have you read any of the comments here? A single sine tone is losslessly encoded in MP3. There aren't any artifacts. It's 15kHz, period. The mosquito is not set to anything much higher, and there are in fact a million people who can hear well above 15k going into their 40s and 50s.

    133. Re:Try this by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit. Compressers and Expanders are dynamics processers. They only change levels of frequencies. They don't magically map one frequency to another frequency. That is a tough bit of work you're talking about, done by complicated algorithms like autotune. Compressers and expanders are relatively simple and only change the relative levels of frequencies, and that's if they are multiband. Usually they compress or expand the entire signal equally.

      See Wiki on Audio Compression

    134. Re:Try this by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      High frequencies are very directional. Try adjusting your soundsticks. Unless you've blown the tweeters in them, chances are they are reproducing 15kHz just fine.

    135. Re:Try this by Kwesadilo · · Score: 1

      Buy another identical device from wherever he got it (Home Depot, whatever) and take your time breaking it carefully.

      If you're going to buy another thing and break it, have a little more flair than that. Modify the device so that instead of an inaudible noise, it makes a high-pitched noise within the audible spectrum of a normal, middle-aged person. Then call the cops again. They'll hear it this time, and it will be annoying.

      Actually, if the old geezer isn't too deaf, he'll be able to hear it too. He may go buy a new one. Then you can intercept him with the offending device in hand on his way home from wherever you get stuff like that. Be sure to have an appropriately attired officer of the law on hand, so you can show him or her the packaging where it says, "Guaranteed to annoy the hell out of those young punks that don't run away when you fire your shotgun into the air."

      --
      This space reserved for administrative use.
    136. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A swing and a miss!

      Methinks you need put down the gun control handbook, take your funny bone out of storage, and research the concept of a rock salt shell.

      "Rock salt shells are hand loaded with rock salt, replacing the standard shot. Rock salt shells were used by rural civilians to defend their property, and were the forerunners of modern less-than-lethal rounds. The brittle salt was unlikely to cause serious injury at long ranges, but would cause stinging light injuries. The use of these charges is mainly anecdotal, though there was a documented case in 2004." Shotgun.

    137. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind that the device in question costs about $1K...

    138. Re:Try this by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Not to mention what those DLP TV's do to an HF rig! Almost total QRM!

      73 de w7com.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    139. Re:Try this by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      What a surprise: the device you're saying is similar to the mosquito ... is the mosquito.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    140. Re:Try this by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      I've had to deal with people of this sort in dealing with my condo association and let me tell you, there are certain segments of the elderly who literally hate everyone.

      Maybe that's because every time they do something their neighbor doesn't like, he sneaks up in the middle of the night and smashes it with a hammer. Did it ever occur to you that you might have earned the reaction you're getting?

      You're lucky you don't live here. I got someone kicked out of my condo for doing that sort of thing to my neighbor.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    141. Re:Try this by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Destroying a device put there for the sole purpose of causing people misery is not a wrong.

      Abby Hoffman used to make the same broad proclamations about prisons. Problem was, it wasn't true back then either. You don't know the story. This might, in fact, be the old man fighting back against the poster, who's been being obnoxious. It's funny how everyone here seems to be saying "omg fight back," and can't seem to understand that that makes the poster into the villain.

      Destroying someone else's property is not justified just because it pisses you off. In this society, we do not have that kind of authority. What he needs to do is to go to the police a second time, and if the cop refuses to investigate, he needs to get the cop's badge number.

      This isn't rocket science, and you can deal with bad neighbors without being a sociopath. Just because your first try didn't work doesn't mean it's time to start ignoring the rules. They're not inconveniences.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    142. Re:Try this by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Damn! I was wondering where that got too!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    143. Re:Try this by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Read them. And amazed at how unthinking they are for people that are supposed to be geeks. Most people are assuming that the ring tone and the mosquito are the same. And they are not. Now you are assuming the ringtone is a perfect sine wave. The Mosquito a a series of tones around 16 kHz. The ring tone is a 15khz tone with noise in it. This DOES make a significant difference to the age that it can be heard.

      Heh! I just did a search to show the difference between the two tones, and this came up. Pretty much what I've been saying.
      http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/12/the-mosquito-rin g-tone-this-adult-can-hear-it/

    144. Re:Try this by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Hit submit too soon. Look at the chart on the left. The 30-39 age group can hear in the 15Khz band. The 18-24 age group reach into the 16kHz band. This is near enough the difference in age range we're talking about, and also the major difference between the two sounds.

    145. Re:Try this by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      ok, so if two wrongs don't make a right, try three!

    146. Re:Try this by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      That guy's blog is trash. Also, I am not "assuming" that the Mosquito is a sine wave. I know it's a sine wave. Have you done a fourier transform on the file linked to from that blog? If that's the mosquito ring tone, it is a 15kHz sine tone. nothing more, nothing less. Shall I send you a pic of a spectral analysis? Or have you figured out how to use Audacity yet?

      How unthinking of you to assume what the contents of that audio file are without doing a spectral analysis

      I think it's really funny that the guy or NYT thinks that file contains 17kHz, then this guy listens to actual 17kHz and obviously can't hear it, so then comes up with a crazy explanation for why he can hear the "17kHz" mosquito tone. Should have just checked his premises. The file contains a 15kHz tone. No noise. Just 15kHz sine wave

    147. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would suspect that sending a signal over radio can cause harmonic distortion and that could introduce all kinds of "new" frequencies to a formerly clean signal...

    148. Re:Try this by skam240 · · Score: 1

      I've never done anything of the sort. I'm referring to my own experience in which my tags were expired on my car, which violated a rule the complex had to prevent abandoned vehicles. I am a low-income college student and at the time I was having problems paying off a ticket (42mph in a 30mph zone) and therefore wasn't able to register my vehicle on time. I was constantly harass by elderly elements of my condo association despite never having had a previous complaint against me for about 2 years (I had made them fully aware of my fiscal situation) and despite the fact that the vehicle was certainly not abandoned. I literally had to park my car in a nearby complex just to get some peace.

      That and delivering meals to the elderly in a volunteer capacity (my high school required volunteer service) for about a year has lead me to the conclusion that there are indeed segments of the elderly who really do hate everyone. Furthermore, these people will go to great lengths to cause grief for others just for the righteous glory of it.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    149. Re:Try this by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      This is not my area of expertise, but "harmonics" of a fundamental are HIGHER than that fundamental. So if the fundamental is 15kHz, the next harmonic is 30kHz. In radio they will surely be bandlimiting their signal, and I don't know what the top frequency it is, but it is surely below the first harmonic of 15kHz.

      Something I know very little about, but have heard anecdotally about are harmonics BELOW a fundamental. In general, the people I've heard mentioning harmonics under a fundamental have known next to nothing about acoustics and audio, so I haven't really paid much attention.

      A possibility is that the 15kHz tone they broadcast heretodyned with some other frequency to produce a lower difference tone. But since they were ostensibly only broadcasting a single sine tone, there would have been no heterodyning.

      Think about radio and TV test tones that you've heard before. Those are pretty pure sine tones. I don't think broadcasting a sine tone is difficult or in danger of introducing other [noticeable] frequencies, particularly BELOW the sine tone's frequency. I welcome the radio broadcasting overloads who know more about this to clear it up.

    150. Re:Try this by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      There are two different things. The original Mosquito device that shops use which has a range of frequencies around 17kHz. And a group of several different ring tones that are a rip off of the concept. One of the rip off is at 14.4 Khz, one at 15 Khz and one at 17 Khz. The blog is right in every regard, but is based on a different ring tone that the one you looked at.

      Try the WAV files on the blog. I can here the so called 15 Khz MP3 ring-tone linked to on /. But I can't hear the 15 Khz pure sine wave WAV.

      But to base assumptions about how well the Mosquito device works based on any number of MP3 ringtones is extremely foolish.

    151. Re:Try this by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      According to this report on the mosquito device and hearing aids, the mosquito emits a 17.8khz tone. That's one sine tone. Which is [well] above the average hearing threshold of a 30 year old.

    152. Re:Try this by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Do you actually have some kind of argument? you sound a bit like an angry teenager not getting his way for now..

    153. Re:Try this by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Eeh, that's still destruction of property. My method's simply more dramatic, and cathartic. ;)

      Could have an argument there aout if removial of power or disconnecting the speaker is actually damaging the device.. but you have a point of course and there is no clear line.

      Consider if you lived next-door to this person, and could hear the noise -all day-. That whining would drive me absolutely nuts within the span of a day, and would probably keep me from sleeping. If you fed this into a prison cell, it'd be classified as torture.

      Consider that I have a microphone and recording and measurement equipment that can quite show this sound being there, evenm if an elderly police officer wouldn't hear it. We'll see eachother in civil court if that is how it has to end..

    154. Re:Try this by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Hmm, so lets move a significant part of the Israeli population into refugee camps?

    155. Re:Try this by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1

      Get your own gun and shoot the frickin' speaker from a safe distance, then.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    156. Re:Try this by wamatt · · Score: 1

      True - the difference is most assholes who are now elderly are retired, and have a full day to make misery for others.

    157. Re:Try this by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      There are many players and plugins for mainstream players that can run gapless audio. The album looks interesting, run it through LAME if you have a copy. =)

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    158. Re:Try this by schotty · · Score: 1

      Its too bad you are right ....

      Man I miss that company. There were lotsa kickass projects I remember building.

      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
    159. Re:Try this by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      An electronic device only designed to irritate others is fair game for "vandalism". The device is meant to be heard beyond the old man's property, so it is encroaching on your freedoms. I imagine that that cutting the speaker diaphram would make it stop emitting anoying noises. The device looks like a loud speaker, so...

      Getting the police too riled up could easily lead to police harrassment of yourself.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    160. Re:Try this by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      In hearing tests two years ago, I could detect tones up to 18 khz. At the time I was 32. This was with soundproofed headphones and with ambient noise I probably couldn't detect it. But saying anyone over twenty could not hear it is wrong.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    161. Re:Try this by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Note the cops can't hear it, even the young ones."

      This makes me wonder if the story is true (and for that matter the marketing). I am over 30, have hearing loss (and permanent tinnitus) and can clearly hear it. If someone like me can hear it, I suspect most people can.

    162. Re:Try this by Zeneris · · Score: 1

      I'm over 40 and can hear that, Ouch. I used to do computer repair (here in the UK) and the line flyback on faulty 50Hz PAL computer monitors used to be so painful that I had to buy ear plugs! Luckily modern monitors and TVs can run at higher line flyback frequencies now, so I use a 100Hz CRT monitor at home, but I can still hear some lower frequency CRT monitors at work.

    163. Re:Try this by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I built a bunch of their stuff when I was a teenager. I used to lust after the H89. Those were the days.

    164. Re:Try this by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Others have picked holes in what you've said already, but I think the company producing the Mosquito severely underestimate the number of people who can still happily hear 15kHz. I can quite happily hear the flyback in my TV (which produces a 15.something kHz whine). My 58-year old father can still hear 15kHz quite happily, despite having abused his hearing working in factories in the '70s with no hearing protection (and racing motorcycles with open mega exhausts).

    165. Re:Try this by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Quite informative.
      Oh yeah, you can give yourself cataracts with steroid eye drops like prednisolone.

      So are you intentionally giving yourself cataracts? Or pointing out a risk?
      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    166. Re:Try this by librarygeek · · Score: 1

      I ma thirty years old, and like you that is far from the upper range of my hearing. In my case depending upon the frequency it also becomes quite painful.

    167. Re:Try this by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      I just ran it through LAME version 3.97 (beta 2, Jan 20 2006).

      Lowest bitrate track is 32 kbps, highest bitrate track 160 kbps (but there's an incredible amount of stereo switching on the last one).

      64 out of 99 tracks are less than 100 kbps. Imagine how many copies of this I can place on my MP3 player!

      And on the gapless playback: none of it on my Samsung YEPP. Firmware upgradeable yes, but what good is that when they do not release new firmware? iTunes on MacOSX only plays back gapless-like when you tell it to overflow songs for 0 seconds. Which it manages to screw up completely with longer tracks (might be 10 or 20 seconds overlap between podcasts).

    168. Re:Try this by schotty · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was really mad that they disappeared when they did. But now with Make magazine and instructables, life is better. Gotta love the net ;D

      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
    169. Re:Try this by AaronHorrocks · · Score: 1

      And once you have the cop's badge number, all the problems of the world will go away!

    170. Re:Try this by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I've got one forming anyway. But if I didn't I'd use the drops; all they would ruin is the lens, which is what's replaced with the IOD.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    171. Re:Try this by Dasein · · Score: 1

      In most jurisdictions, this would land the shooter in jail for quite a while. In most jurisdictions, there's still a duty to retreat and you must be in eminent danger to qualify for a self-defense argument. Unlikely, if you shoot somebody for walking into your yard with a hammer from the safety of your house.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    172. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A. You have no sense of humor. Please review the moderation tag.
      B. In most states, there is no duty to retreat. I realistically question whether firing a shotgun with a less-than-lethal shell would be considered self-defense using lethal force, but otherwise this attorney calls bullsh*t. I've got three years of law school, 5 years of practice, and two state bars. You'd better have at least a website.
      C. You have no sense of humor, and you're posting your humorless reply NINE AND A HALF DAYS later.

      Get a grip.

    173. Re:Try this by Dasein · · Score: 1

      A. You have no sense of humor. Please review the moderation tag.
      There's some subjects I don't find funny. Besides, if I let slashdot tell me what was funny and not, I'd have an awfully strange sense of humor.

      B. In most states, there is no duty to retreat. I realistically question whether firing a shotgun with a less-than-lethal shell would be considered self-defense using lethal force, but otherwise this attorney calls bullsh*t. I've got three years of law school, 5 years of practice, and two state bars. You'd better have at least a website.
      Stand-your-ground laws wikipedia article. From the wikipedia article, "Since the enactment of the Florida legislation, South Dakota, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Michigan, and Indiana have adopted similar statutes..."

      IANAL but I'm not completely ignorant of the law. I did put my wife through law school and help her study for her tests. Certainly weaker credentials that you. However, I'm a math guy and we're not so up for "Appeal to authority" arguments. Anyway, I think I'm pretty sure that I'm on solid ground here.

      C. You have no sense of humor, and you're posting your humorless reply NINE AND A HALF DAYS later.
      See A. Sorry I didn't see the story earlier.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    174. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stand-your-ground laws wikipedia article. From the wikipedia article, "Since the enactment of the Florida legislation, South Dakota, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Michigan, and Indiana have adopted similar statutes..."

      You're misconstruing the law(s), and assuming that the 43 states not mentioned in the article have laws that correspond to your assumed view. Ask your wife this elemental question: assuming that you are in a state with a duty to retreat, are you required to retreat when you are on your own homestead (or in your own apartment, condo, or what have you).

      Elementary and correct answer in virtually every state (I know of no exceptions): No.
      It's a well known exception to the duty to retreat, and the duty to retreat is a minority viewpoint in the United States. I suggest that you use Google to search for a criminal law outline before you dig a deeper hole.

  5. Quit bitching by sockman · · Score: 4, Funny

    And record the "noise" phase shift it by 180, and play it on your stero. Viola, no mosquito.

    1. Re:Quit bitching by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, that will work great in a two dimensional world. Here in three dimensions it will suck a lot in all the places where amplitude is doubled instead.

    2. Re:Quit bitching by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 2, Informative

      That will work, but only at certain angles. Really, you don't need to 'Phase shift' it, that happens naturally. All he needs to do is play the sound an integer + 1/2 number of wavelengths away from the original source and at the same volume, and he should be as close to inline with both sources as possible. Really, you were right in concept though. It's basically a moire effect for waves http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_noise_control http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_cancellation

      --
      I am Spartacus
    3. Re:Quit bitching by sockman · · Score: 1

      It'll be fine since mosquito noise isn't that far from white noise, on average it will cancel out.

    4. Re:Quit bitching by bassgoonist · · Score: 1

      Uh...that's not gonna work...all the different places his noise maker is bouncing off...you'll likely just add a 'warble' to it if you do that.

      --
      You can tell I'm an aries because of my ram.
    5. Re:Quit bitching by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      it acts very similar to 2-slit diffraction

      --
      I am Spartacus
    6. Re:Quit bitching by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Ummm. This does not work. Headphones that use this technology effectively cancel outside noicse. However, the "anti-noise" has to be in synch with the emitting, outside noise. Imagine two waves... One by a 200 pound man jumping in the water, another by an identical 200 lb man. The waves will at certain points cancel each other. At others, they will actually add to each other. It depends on where you are in the water relative to the two men.

      Your solution would cause a doubling of the noise for certain areas, partial addition or cancellation for most, and an exact negation for a small area.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    7. Re:Quit bitching by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're serious or not.

      Please tell me you're joking.

    8. Re:Quit bitching by sockman · · Score: 1

      For certain areas... ala his house. Sounds good to me.

    9. Re:Quit bitching by sockman · · Score: 1

      Yes, ok, white noise is across the full spectrum. Mosquito noise may be concentrated at a certain center frequency, but it is still spread fairly evenly around that frequency hence any signal which has the same average frequency domain spectrum will dim the noise. Seriously, if he wants the noise gone at his house, this will be a good solution. When his neighbors get annoyed enough to complain eventually the authorities will respond.

    10. Re:Quit bitching by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Not only is this technically impossible, but it also doesn't address the problem of the person in question being a public nuisance who should be punished under the law.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    11. Re:Quit bitching by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      Not for his house. Possible for a very small portion of his house, if nothing was reflecting the waves. Also, à la does not mean what you think it means.

    12. Re:Quit bitching by mlyle · · Score: 4, Informative

      You sir, are an idiot.

      The wavelength of, say, 14KHz sound is very, very small -- about 2.5cm.

      Therefore the "shadow" cast by a cancelling device is also very, very small unless the out-of-phase canceller is right next to the noise source. The phase of the canceller will reverse (making things louder rather than quieter) every 1.2cm of distance difference between (the listener and the sound source) and (the listener and the canceller).

      So, if you're say 10 meters from the canceller, and 20 meters from the guy's noisemaker, and the devices are in line (the best case) with your present position... you just need to go about .7 meters left or right for things to be at double intensity.

      Not really a practical solution.

    13. Re:Quit bitching by Scaba · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you trying to say the phase-shifted noise of a Mosquito annoyancebot sounds like a viola?

    14. Re:Quit bitching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit bitching is right. Back in my day, old people made annoying sounds that everyone could here. All the time. Up hill both ways, in the snow. And we liked it. So much that we said "Thank you" and asked them to keep going.

    15. Re:Quit bitching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'd like to believe that you're trying to be funny, but on Slashdot that would be wild optimism. The original poster did the calculation using the speed of sound. Your calculation uses the speed of light. You would appear to be the idiot.

    16. Re:Quit bitching by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      gutted

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    17. Re:Quit bitching by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Funny
      You sir, who likes to call other people idiots, seem to lack a fundamental understanding of the relationship between frequency and wavelength, as well as the basics of using an internet search engine.

      And then there's people who lack the fundamental understanding that sound waves do not propagete at lightspeed.

    18. Re:Quit bitching by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I, on the other hand, would love to see a 20,000 meter long soundwave.

      How the hell would you even generate that?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    19. Re:Quit bitching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, what? "[A]ny signal with the same average frequency domain spectrum will dim the noise"? So, for example, installing another, exact duplicate mosquito noise generator will dim the noise, even without phase-shifting it? Don't be ridiculous. And it's not as if using a phase-shifted version will cause his house to be silent but the neighbors' houses to be amplitude-doubled. The distances involved will be much much smaller.

      Your "on average, it will cancel out" theory still demands explanation.

    20. Re:Quit bitching by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Well as long as we're emboldening things, I'd like to point out that sound doesn't propagate at all (write that spelling down, son.) To propagate is to have children or otherwise to breed, not to move outwards. Sound waves "transmit" instead.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    21. Re:Quit bitching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prop a gate v. tr. 6. Physics. To cause (a wave, for example) to move in some direction or through a medium; transmit. -- The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition

    22. Re:Quit bitching by 49152 · · Score: 1

      This is sound not light. 2.5 cm wavelength is correct.

    23. Re:Quit bitching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, need to remember that light travels faster than sound.
      That's why some people appear bright until they open their mouths.

    24. Re:Quit bitching by idonthack · · Score: 1

      Either a very very large subwoofer or a very very small black hole.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    25. Re:Quit bitching by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Cool.

      Incidentally, your sig doesn't seem to do what you think it does.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    26. Re:Quit bitching by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      Otherwise known as the Comb Filter Effect.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comb_filter

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    27. Re:Quit bitching by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      And then there's people who lack the fundamental understanding that sound waves do not propagete at lightspeed.

      And then there are people who don't check their facts before correcting someone. Actually, if it was traveling at lightspeed the wavelength would be 3E8/14E3= 21 kilometers.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  6. You kids!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Get off my lawn!

  7. Get a young police officer... by gweihir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the only way to go is the legal route. Try to get a young police officer. If that fails, get an expert that can measure the signal and testify about ist impact on younger people. I would be surprised very much if hwat your neoghbour does is legal.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Get a young police officer... by jpardey · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you can't get a young police officer, kidnap a young police officer's young child and strap him to your neighbour's lawn. This will give the police someone to trust, and will also get you away from the house for a few years.

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
    2. Re:Get a young police officer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the only way to go is the legal route. Try to get a young police officer. If that fails, get an expert that can measure the signal and testify about ist impact on younger people. I would be surprised very much if hwat your neoghbour does is legal.

      I strongly disagree. This is one of those little things that is best solved without getting the justice system involved. Seriously. He's trying to pick a fight. Just go steal his noisemaker, or slice its power cord or something at 2AM in the morning. Maybe he'll call the cops, but they can't do anything without a witness. (Don't threaten him or vandalize anything else - that's escalation.) Everybody learns a little lesson, and hopefully everybody won't be such asshats in the future. Getting the authorities involved is just a long, expensive, pointless process that probably won't solve the problem anyways.

    3. Re:Get a young police officer... by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      slice its power cord or something at 2AM in the morning

      Dispite the redundancy in there, I think that's a great idea! If you keep complaining about the damned thing after you've disabled it, he won't even know it's broken.

    4. Re:Get a young police officer... by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you there. What can he do, sue the whole neighborhood for interfering with his right to annoy everyone?

    5. Re:Get a young police officer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What redundancy? Dude, he should do it at 2AM in the night, when it's dark out. He'd get caught if he did it in the morning.

    6. Re:Get a young police officer... by Vary+Krishna · · Score: 1

      I love that this is the most sensible suggestion so far. Do it! You'll be a local hero! Although, anyone who's willing to buy a device that costs almost $1,000 American (and that's before shipping) just to annoy his neighbors has to have some serious issues. As in ordered-around-by-his-dog, saves-his-toenail-clippings, young-women's-heads-stored-in-the-freezer issues. I'd move.

    7. Re:Get a young police officer... by bunions · · Score: 1

      Hilarious and true.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    8. Re:Get a young police officer... by jcr · · Score: 1

      I think the only way to go is the legal route.

      Exactly. The neighbor is creating a nuisance, so you sue for a court order to make him knock it off. This is what tort law is all about.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:Get a young police officer... by trentblase · · Score: 1
      Dispite the redundancy in there, I think that's a great idea! If you keep complaining about the damned thing after you've disabled it, he won't even know it's broken.

      Despite the spelling error in there, you're right about the redundancy!

    10. Re:Get a young police officer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Excuse me, sir. I work for the Department of Redundancy Department, and I'm afraid I'm going to need to have to ask you to come with me over here. We've got a few questions to ask.

    11. Re:Get a young police officer... by bcmm · · Score: 1

      FFS. Don't ever cut mains power cables. It is inevitable that the blade will short the live and the neutral at some point during the cut, which will cause everything to get very hot and some fuses to blow in a louder and more fun fashion than is normal. This could really really not be done undetected.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    12. Re:Get a young police officer... by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      I strongly disagree. This is one of those little things that is best solved without getting the justice system involved.

      Typical case of confusion between cause and effect..

      This started because of someone thinking exactly what you suggest and going the 'lets fix it myself' route. Without that attitude that device wouldn't be there to begin with.

    13. Re:Get a young police officer... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      FFS. Don't ever cut mains power cables. It is inevitable that the blade will short the live and the neutral at some point during the cut, which will cause everything to get very hot and some fuses to blow in a louder and more fun fashion than is normal. This could really really not be done undetected.

      Hmm... So, what you're saying is that, with a very simple modification, this device will blow his fuses every time it is turned on >?-)

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    14. Re:Get a young police officer... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      '' Exactly. The neighbor is creating a nuisance, so you sue for a court order to make him knock it off. This is what tort law is all about. ''

      This might of course backfire if the court asks him _why_ he put up the device. These things don't happen without a reason. Like: How often has his property been damaged in the last year? How often has he been insulted by neighbour kids? How many calls to the police without any result? Without knowing that, it is preposterous to make any judgement.

    15. Re:Get a young police officer... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      A young cop won't help, his hearing has already been damaged by firearm training. Your other idea sounds like it may have merit... but it would be hard as hell getting a cop who couldn't hear the sound to go to the trouble.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    16. Re:Get a young police officer... by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Younger police officer probably wouldn't work, though. Police officers all have gun training on the firing range and probably all loose the upper registers a little younger. You'd have to get someone with undamaged hearing, not someone younger.

      Besides, this old man can't even hear the device himself. If you disabled it in a non-visible way he wouldn't KNOW it was disabled.

    17. Re:Get a young police officer... by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Why not a security camera? Why would this stop damage when they could just damage his property and leave immediately? If he even admitted he thought it was his neighbors without any evidence, he'd lose immediately because the device would then be known to be inteaded to terrorize his neighbors.

    18. Re:Get a young police officer... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      sure you can, electricity distributors do it all the time you just have to make sure you use insulated tools and only cut one core at a time. you can also i belive get ceramic blades though if the cable is fine stranded this won't gaurantee a shortless cut.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    19. Re:Get a young police officer... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      yeah, go ahead and slice a 120V AC line! I wanna see that...from a safe distance of course...

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    20. Re:Get a young police officer... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Um... No problem. Just use rubber handled cutters, and only cut one wire at a time. I do it all the time when I'm changing outlets or light switches. Even when you screw it up, a safe distance is about 4 inches.

  8. Observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not that I'm condoning any particular course of action, but I just though it worth pointing out that if he can't hear it himself, he can't tell if it's still functioning. Just an observation.

    1. Re:Observation by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful
      if he can't hear it himself, he can't tell if it's still functioning.

      Only if the poster stops complaining. So if the device has an accident with a pair of wire cutters in the middle of the night one should continue to act outraged for a while.

    2. Re:Observation by Brett+Johnson · · Score: 2

      When the company I working for in 1995 moved to its new building, my new cubicle was positioned directly under a paging system speaker. After hearing the VP marketing/sales paged every 15 minutes for a week, the speaker above my desk mysteriously stopped working late one night ;-). That "problem" remained until I left, five years later.

    3. Re:Observation by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting
      my new cubicle was positioned directly under a paging system speaker.

      Yeah I had that problem until about six months ago. The most anoying thing is that occasionally the receptionist who pages people would key the microphone, inhale prior to speaking, get distracted and forget about saying anything.

      There seems to be a low level mute switch in all of us which waits for the other person to speak, after hearing them inhale. Its like those DOS tricks where you initiate a connection and don't complete it.

  9. how about by teh_mykel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how about you go talk to him, ask him to turn it off maybe?

    --
    this sig no verb
  10. Skip the police. by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who needs the cops? Sue him. He'll take it down in seconds. You won't even have to go to court.

    Then, all you need to do is be annoying enough that he moves to Florida. (Unless you already live in Florida, in which case you're screwed.)

    1. Re:Skip the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably not a unique occurence. Go for a class action suit. Sue the manufacturer and all their other customers using the product.

    2. Re:Skip the police. by linuxtelephony · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Claim it's damaging your ears and killing your ability to hear sounds in the higher frequency range. If it's on after 10PM (or whatever the local disturbing the peace violations occur), call the cops and report that high pitch noise is disrupting your peace. Have all the neighbors also call. If it's more than one household, they'll do something. When the responding officers don't do anything, get their names and badge numbers (but, as we learned earlier, don't videotape them unless you want to be a martyr) and then call and complain that they responding officers failed to stop the disturbance in the neighborhood and ask for supervisors.

      --
      . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
    3. Re:Skip the police. by wknoxwalker · · Score: 1

      This better be sarcasm, else I'm adding another point to my "Laughs at teh armenians" list.

    4. Re:Skip the police. by 70Bang · · Score: 1

      When the responding officers don't do anything, get their names and badge numbers (but, as we learned earlier, don't videotape them unless you want to be a martyr)

      Really.

      Last summer, one of the local affiliates aired a story which involved a private investigator who was practically tailgating a state trooper (no siren or emergency lights) on I-65 as it heads out of Indy on its way to Chicago. The PI was doing it as much out of fun as anything. After all, we see the cops go 10+ mph over the rest of traffic, knowing no one is going to do anything about it. His video showed his speed via local dash and the trooper's cruiser just up & over his steering wheel with the license plate in view for proper identification. This apparently went on for quite some time. The thing the reporter mentioned was that this guy was driving like the trooper's wing man and he never really seemed to notice and|or care. There was no followup as to what happened to the trooper.

      Totally unrelated - galaxies away, but part of recent investigations (from the same affiliate): Basically Dumpster Diving Behind Rx. Extending Social Engineering beyond what we're used to (passwords & whatnot). What was wild was seeing some of the pill bottles which contained partial bottles of oxy* (the wildcard fits - there's a ton of joy pills fitting into the "oxy" mold). Someone actually had the cajones to use the 'script info, greet a woman at her front door, and ask for the remainder of her pills because they were a bad batch or they'd be exchanged, or something like that. The best part was when the stores were shown. One lady said they had no business digging in their trash, others still had a problem on follow-up visits.

      unf%ck'nbelievable.

    5. Re:Skip the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, we see the cops go 10+ mph over the rest of traffic

      and thank god they do - what are you going to do if they stuck exactly to the speed limit? Overtake and screech off into the distance?

    6. Re:Skip the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not Florida! What if he moved next door to me??

      Even worse, what if I don't hear the damn thing? Then I'll know my ears are shot, and I gotta start actin old n stuff....

    7. Re:Skip the police. by gwbennett · · Score: 1

      Video all you want; just don't audio tap them. [sic]

      --
      Where is this free beer everyone on Slashdot keeps talking about?
    8. Re:Skip the police. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      They'll defend. Aggressively. They can't afford to stop making their product.

    9. Re:Skip the police. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      But how accurately was his speedo calibrated? I mean, sure, the trooper was probably speeding, but the evidence that he was is pretty much worthless even for it to be dealt with internally by the state police.

  11. Beat frequency by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Build a similar device to emit noise at a slightly different frequency. The result will be horrible sounds as the two waves interfere. The horrible sounds will seem to come from both your source and the original source. You may get the blame but at least the cops/etc will believe that an issue exists.

    1. Re:Beat frequency by andy753421 · · Score: 1

      Or set it up on a microphone so that yours only plays when his is turned on. That way he can hear it as well and will turn it off himself.

    2. Re:Beat frequency by Eudial · · Score: 0
      Build a similar device to emit noise at a slightly different frequency. The result will be horrible sounds as the two waves interfere. The horrible sounds will seem to come from both your source and the original source. You may get the blame but at least the cops/etc will believe that an issue exists.


      Are you sure that will actually work? All that it will do is modulate the amplitude, not much affecting the frequency of the sound. So the only people that will be able to hear these "horrible" sounds will be you and your fellow young people.
      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    3. Re:Beat frequency by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      The beat frequency will be quite different than the original.

    4. Re:Beat frequency by photonic · · Score: 1

      As your parent says, the combination of two high frequencies only causes amplitude modulation. The beat frequency is observed by your brain. This still requires that both individual frequencies are observed by your ear, which would not work for the old guy. You need a nonlinear element to actually generate the difference frequency (e.g. a diode in an AM-radio receiver).

      --
      karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    5. Re:Beat frequency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, air will act as a nonlinear element and produce a difference frequency. http://www.raven1.net/aegis.htm/ http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/audio/1 279591.html?page=2&c=y/

    6. Re:Beat frequency by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      The beat frequency is observed by your brain.
      No, some interesting effects are produced by the way the brain processes sound, but this isn't one of them. The beat frequency is produced physically, through nonlinear elements such as air, your ear and eardrum, and various objects around you. You can be completely deaf to the higher-frequency components and still hear the tone that's the difference of the two frequencies.
    7. Re:Beat frequency by photonic · · Score: 1

      True, but as your article describes, this is a quadratic effect which only works at high amplitudes. This is usually achieved by focussing the microwaves in mid-air using a phased array. Using two divergent sources as the OP suggested is not going to do the trick.

      --
      karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    8. Re:Beat frequency by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Now, that is ingeneous. Subtle and easy to achieve with modest electronics skill.

  12. Long Range Acoustic Device by dduardo · · Score: 1

    All you need to do is point this system at his home: LRAD. This is the same technology they use to diperse rioters.

  13. ideas by alienw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, if the cops don't care, you don't need to stick to legal means. I hear BB guns work pretty well for destroying plastic things. Paintball markers are also quite excellent for this purpose. Or use a nice big water gun on it. Of course, I recommend you just call the cops again. There are plenty of cops under 40.

    1. Re:ideas by Squalish · · Score: 1

      Cops of any age have the problem of being frequent visitors to the firing range.

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
  14. Egg 'im by talkingpaperclip · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just egg his house. That will surely make him realize his immaturity and bring a swift end to his harassment.

  15. PLL by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He could use microphone and amplifier to pick up the signal and a phase locked loop to divide the frequency by two, then feed the lot into a really big speaker. The only hard part is convincing people that the bad noise is really coming from over there.

    OTH how about using the stereo effect? If the neighbour on the other side can go along with it bracket his place with speakers and feed the signal in so it appears to be coming from the original location? I like this article. Lots of hacking potential.

  16. Damn them! Damn them! by Kamineko · · Score: 1

    Damn those mosquitoes! They constantly harass me with their noise devices!

    Curses!

  17. Take it to City Hall by amrust · · Score: 1

    Just have your parents all complain to the Mayor/Council at the next City Council meeting. Have them all explain they would love to come out and vote, but the noise outside drives them crazy, so they'll probably have to stay inside on election day.

    Problem solved.

    --
    VOTE!
    1. Re:Take it to City Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fix this petty problem I'm having with my neighbor or I won't vote for you! And wipe my ass while you're here, I'm too helpless and limp-wristed to do it!"

      Go back to crying yourself to sleep you pathetic pansy. Some of us have a spine and don't run crying like a little bitch our parents to beg our elected officials to fix every little problem in our lives.

    2. Re:Take it to City Hall by amrust · · Score: 1

      "Some of us have a spine..."

      This coming from someone posting as Anonymous Coward?

      --
      VOTE!
    3. Re:Take it to City Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooooooh, you sure stuck it to me! No no, don't touch me, I'm too badly burned! Posting or not posting as an AC has nothing to do with having a spine and everything to do with not having a slashdot account.

      Fact of the matter is, you can't reply to the truth that you're a spinless nancy-boy bitch-ass pussy whose best advice is "I'm going to tell my mommy and she's going to passive-aggresively show you!" so instead you come back with a sharp "Nu-uh, YOU ARE!" reply. Why don't you go run and tell your mommy that the big bad man on the Internets made fun of you so she can breastfeed you again to soothe your shattered nerves? Or maybe write your congressman and beg for legislation to stop the bad men who troll you on the intarweb? Or maybe you can just come up with a better idea than trying to get mommy and daddy and elected officials to settle your petty interpersonal disputes?

    4. Re:Take it to City Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is the worst suggestion amid the other horrible ideas in the article. congrats.

    5. Re:Take it to City Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if your town is small enough, you could easily get those things banned with a hefty fine for using them and then call the police on him after he continues to use it.

    6. Re:Take it to City Hall by amrust · · Score: 1

      There was a JOKE back there, that you both must have missed.

      My point was (if there was a serious one to be made), that the original poster of the question asked Slashdot what to do. And mentioned that the old guy in question was basically "mad at the young-uns" for just generally being around, I guess. So I figured that they (the poster, and friends) MUST be young adults, or they would handle the problem in a more mature way. Like:

      1. Asking the guy to remove it.
      2. Shooting it out.
      3. Getting another police officer's opinion.

      The fact they couldn't get a cop to listen to their story is what made me think the OP was young. So I (JOKINGLY) suggested an alternative for a younger person to try. Like I said, us adults would go a different route, true.

      Just a misunderstanding. And admittedly a bad joke, apparently.

      Lesson learned. I won't be trying that again for awhile.

      --
      VOTE!
    7. Re:Take it to City Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, I even used the word "troll" in my post and you still replied? Hook, line, sinker; bagged, gutted, fileted; served on a stick.

  18. Ask Shakespeare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Instead of "Ask Slashdot", shouldn't this be under "Ask Your Lawyer"?"

    Unfortunately too many took Shakespeare's "kill all the lawyers" to heart.

  19. Hmmmm by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Am I the only one that thinks this is a novel Slashvertizement?

    How many of you thought "hmmmm. I could use this to really annoy xxx"?

    And note that the link goes to a specifc supplier of such items. Not a generic link.... say a wiki. I mean, who really believes that some guy cannot get a cop under 40. Cannot figure out that he should talk to the police and explain more, or maybe go to see a lawyer... or maybe sneak into his neighbor's year with a baseball bat and a ski mask?

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Hmmmm by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not a generic link.... say a wiki. I mean, who really believes that some guy cannot get a cop under 40.

      I believe this device is only made by one manufacturer (patented, probably). And according to the web site of the anti-social child-torturing bastards ("Won't somebody please think of the children, and ban this horrible thing?!?!") who make this device, the high frequencies it uses are generally inaudible to people over 20.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Hmmmm by cheesygrapes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep, From the human rights review in the legal section (there's something about this in the questions too but they seem to be more truthful in the legal section, mentioning that it actually can cause hearing damage in long term exposure): "2. As the transmission of the sound produced by the Device is directional and as high frequency wavelengths do not travel through solid objects, we do not consider that it is likely that the Device will cause a nuisance to neighbours of its users. " Since this is not heard by adults because it is a very high frequency and since it doesn't travel that far even through open air, I doubt it could bemuch of bother sleeping nearby or such since you wouldn't be able to hear it through the walls of your house.

    3. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, this is a real story. I actually wrote it based off of a forum post by someone else as a quasi-humorous way to see how the Slashdot readership would handle it.

    4. Re:Hmmmm by zsau · · Score: 1

      I'm over twenty, and I can hear sounds at least in the vicinity of 20 kHz (I've never done a proper test, but playing sounds out of speakers that are meant to be 20 kHz and that others can't hear, I can. It is difficult to determine whether I can hear higher than that--most speakers, audio file formats and so forth around aren't designed to reach 20 kHz, let alone higher! (The common 44.1 kHz sample rate can theoretically safely record up to 22 kHz, but in reality the cut-off (which, like our ears', is gradual) is below that, so that absolutely nothing remains above that frequency.)

      High-pitched noises are very annoying in general. They tend to be artificial (as in, speech or birds sounds or the sound of a book falling are all much lower, whereas the sound of a tv or a transformer are up in this range) and so they're either "pink noise" or sine waves, and both are very ugly. If it's designed to be annoying--god, I cannot understand why this sort of a thing should be legal!

      The people who make these devices are plain and simple arses, and it's obvious they can't here 'em. Just because their test subjects don't move off straight away doesn't mean it's uncomfortable straight away.

      --
      Look out!
    5. Re:Hmmmm by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I mean, who really believes that some guy cannot get a cop under 40.

      They didn't say that. Someone speculated that the firearms training and use might have damaged their hearing, but usually the training involves hearing protection.

      It is weird that they say just about anyone under 40 can hear it.

    6. Re:Hmmmm by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      So you admit that it is falsified? You can't just take someone else's story, rewrite it (in the first person), and submit it as your own. For all you know, the original post was an advertisement or just a work of creative fiction. I'd say the GP was correct; this is a bogus story.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    7. Re:Hmmmm by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that thinks this is a novel Slashvertizement?

      Judging from the number of "I'm 45 and I can hear it," replies, it appears to have beackired if that was the case.

  20. Dragonflys eat mosquitos by alshithead · · Score: 1

    Build a giant electronic dragonfly to eat it!

    Actually, he's a smart old chap isn't he? Most noise ordinances are based on excessive decibels. A lawsuit is most likely to be effective but you should probably hire a good (expensive) lawyer and hope for a very young judge if you go that route. Of course, the simpler but more dangerous route of putting the thing out of commission. Gamo makes some pretty serious air rifles. Stick to a non-powder gun to minimize the risk of jail time in case you get caught. Or, you could even try to steal it and chuck it in a lake. Take precautions to hide your identity in case the smart old cuss has video too. I am not advocating that you break any laws. I've just listed several options.

    --
    I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    1. Re:Dragonflys eat mosquitos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      putting the thing out of commission. Gamo makes some pretty serious air rifles.

      If he's gonna go that far, he might as well do it right:

      http://slashdot.org/articles/99/09/10/0826258.shtm l

      This should take the device out of comission, as well as any other electronic device in the codger's vicinity.

  21. Do an end run around him. by Mattintosh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Several (disjointed) ideas sprang to mind:

    1) Get a sound meter (dB meter, noise level meter, or whatever it's called where you are) and call the cops again. Show the meter to the officer.
    2) Buy big speakers and send some noise his direction that he CAN hear. I recommend NES chiptunes.
    3) Disconnect the device without his knowledge. He can't hear it, so he can't tell if it's working or not.
    4) Kick the neighbor in the nuts. If he gets angry, kick him in the nuts again. If he threatens you, proceed to #5.
    5) Shoot him. You didn't need the curmudgeonly bastard anyway. Take his stuff and tell his family he went on vacation to BFE. Be sure to dispose of his body properly - through a wood chipper, then burn the chunks. Invite other young neighbors over for BBQ. Display a big cookbook with a cover that says "To Serve Annoying Old Neighbors".

    (And just for the humor impaired, options 4 and 5 are not serious. I am not the voice in your head telling you to assault or kill your neighbor. That voice is named Larry. I'm Matt.)

    1. Re:Do an end run around him. by garyrich · · Score: 1

      Re #1: most noise meters are SPL meters. They measure energy. Horrible as that sound is, it won't register very loud in terms of sound pressure waves. For #3 - you go kill it. I'm not sure I could get that close to the accursed thing.

      --
      -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    2. Re:Do an end run around him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hah, you call that proper disposal of a body? The wood chipper would be far too messy, and you'd never rid yourself of all the DNA. Far better to use a bathtub full of bleach over the course of a few days; the solution should be inaccessible to police testing.

    3. Re:Do an end run around him. by Rayeh · · Score: 0

      Hi, I'm Larry.

    4. Re:Do an end run around him. by mindriot · · Score: 1

      You could, however, take your PC and a reasonably good microphone and make a recording. While that won't make it any more audible, the waveform or spectral display will make the tone quite visible. The question is, of course, whether that'll actually convince anyone...

      You could invite a cop over and make a sample recording of your voice somewhere inside your house, and show him what the spectrum looks like. Also, maybe make a sample silent recording just to demonstrate the effect on the spectral display. Prepare an artificial file with a sound wave of increasing pitch. Show him what the spectrum looks like and ask him at what frequency he stops hearing anything. Show him visually that just because he doesn't hear anything doesn't mean there's nothing to hear.

      Then (having tested this before of course), take the mic outside to wherever that Mosquito thing is clearly audible to you. Take a recording, show him the spectrum visualization. I think you should have a case then.

      There's your News-for-Nerds-worthy answer. :)

    5. Re:Do an end run around him. by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

      Recommended listening: Dead Body Disposal by Necro

      At least look up the lyrics.

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    6. Re:Do an end run around him. by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      A wise friend in college once told me the secret to getting unwelcome guests to leave.. I imagine it would also work on the elderly.

      cradle of filth.

      "THIS BAND IS GREAT," as you turn the volume to 11.

      Actually, I've found something more.. bad.. recently. Wolf Eyes - Stabbed in the Face.

      TERRIBLE SONG.

      PLAY IT AT 7PM WHEN HE'S GOING TO SLEEP .. tell your neighbors to do the same.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    7. Re:Do an end run around him. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      The dBA scale is weighted to higher frequency sounds, and is the basis for noise ordinances. Compare the readings with it on and off, and consult your local noise ordinance on what the limits at the property line are for above ambient. Some cities also have limits on noise levels for any specific frequency, so you could filter for a single frequency and determine the intensity for that. Usually, this is just around light industrial areas mixed with housing, but it could be worth a shot.

  22. £495 ...? by euxneks · · Score: 4, Informative

    This guy spent £495 to annoy the shit out of you? Either you deserved this, or the guy is a complete prick, in the latter case, fight fire with fire. Get some _very_ large subwoofers, a good amp, and play a song like Hootchie Mama by 2 live crew, or if that's not your style, maybe something like "Superpredators" by Massive Attack.
        Or, even if you don't like that, just find something with real spleen shattering bass and just blast it.

    Also, for those interested, I found a link to the mosquito sound here from an article at the Beeb here, also, another interesting turn-around:
    http://www.boingboing.net/2006/05/24/kids_turn_tee n_repel.html
    Quite fascinating...

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    1. Re:£495 ...? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, I'm of the mind they *are* making a lot of noise carelessly; I have neighbors that do so, and don't seem to give a damn. His reaction sounds exactly like something I want to do to people who are disrespectful to me like that. Except that I have very sensitive hearing, so that would hurt me too.

      Why did it never occur to them that they might just be experiencing what he was previously? Are they reading to negotiate a deal, which would require admitting they did exactly what he's doing?

    2. Re:£495 ...? by fatmatt_oz · · Score: 1

      Just thinking about this and noticed that audacity has an option to generate a tone. So I did, at 19000Hz. Couldn't hear a thing, so I stepped down in 500Hz bits, I start to hear it at about 17500Hz and it's really annoying at about 16500Hz (test subject is in his mid thrities and has worked in a somewhat noisy industrial setting for 10 years). Seems simple enough to go from that (wav) to an mp3. I'm not 100% if my headset can play that high a sound. I might download a range of tones to my phone and next time I go down the park in the afternoon I'll see what the dogs like. Or maybe a club would do.

    3. Re:£495 ...? by josquin9 · · Score: 1

      I listened to the mp3, and wasn't able to hear anything, but my skin felt like it was crawling and every hair on my arms stood up. (i just turned 40 last month.)

      I only mention it in case it may be possible to get some people over the age of 25 to acknowledge that there's something going on even if they can't "hear" the sound.

    4. Re:£495 ...? by sm62704 · · Score: 1
      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    5. Re:£495 ...? by pbhj · · Score: 1

      This isn't water-tight but ... if he was rich he'd live somewhere without annoying gangs of youths loitering around ... even if they behave well.

  23. A couple solutions come to mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years back I saw a tv show deomnstrate a home-brew electromagnetic pulse device that could shut off a car. I suppose something like that would shut down the buzzer - and probably anything else nearby. You might have the added benifit that the old fellow won't notice the buzzer is dead, since he can't hear it.

    The rub is that it's probably illegal, cost prohibitive, and potentially really hazardous if the old fellow has a pacemaker or other medical gear.

    There is a legal, affordable, and perfectly acceptable alternative though: http://www.envirosafetyproducts.com/cats.php?id=28 2

  24. IANAL by TCQuad · · Score: 1

    Break into his home and disable the device. Since he can't hear it, he won't know it's broken. Actually, since these are usually installed outside, breaking and entering may not even be required. Just don't damage the outside of the case while cutting the wires and you'll be fine.

  25. Let me tell you how this works by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Funny

    I recognize this situation. The woman is a sociopath. She is doing all this to make people around her jump, for the purpose of her own amusement.

    There's really only one thing to do when faced with a sociopath, and that's to completely stay our of her life entirely. She's so completely emotionally different from you that she's practically not human. Really, her only purpose in life, the only way she can break the monotony of feeling only primitive emotions is to think of ways to make all the people around her jump.

    But since you don't have that option, you can at least fight back. This will NOT solve your problem because she can't stop what she's doing. But it'll be fun.

    I recommend that if she has a dog or cat, kill it, paint the inside of her car with the feces and blood, dump the organs down her chimney, and throw what's left through her front window. Let her stew on that a while. After she gets her car and house cleaned up, get a can of gas and burn them both to the ground. That's about what it's going to take to stop this old lady if she's truly a sociopath, short of putting her in the hospital or worse.

    If you're not willing or able to do this, then you really need to consider what you're going to do. Measured responses are going to be worse than doing nothing at all. Maybe you should disable her noisemaker device somehow. She can't hear it anyway, how will she know it's broken?

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Let me tell you how this works by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      First you are going to have to castrate him in order to turn the grumpy old man of the submitter's story into a sociopathic woman.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  26. Fight fire with out-of-phase fire by ipoverscsi · · Score: 1

    Buy yourself a Mosquito and shift the phase to cancel out his. It might not protect the entire neighborhood, but at least you'll have some peace and quite in your own home.

  27. I hear nothing? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    I don't hear anything from that link. I'm only 20. Is this good or bad? :/

    1. Re:I hear nothing? by sockman · · Score: 1

      Bad... I'm 26, I was in Iraq around loud machine gun fire, and I can hear it. Man it's annoying. Stupid teenagers.

    2. Re:I hear nothing? by karnal · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, are you serious?

      I have a slightly damaged left ear, and I hear the high pitched tone there... Of course, you can never get your hearing loss to go to childhood levels, but nowadays I play my drums with earplugs, and I also wear earplugs when I mow the lawn.

      Every piece saved for the love of my music... I would go insane if I were to go deaf.

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:I hear nothing? by Mo6eB · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Tried turning up your speakers? I can hear it and it is bloody annoying. I do not think I would be able to restrain myself from killing, or at least infilcting great bodily harm to the owner for more than 5 minutes, should he refuse to stop the device.

    4. Re:I hear nothing? by Kuukai · · Score: 1

      Probably not, I know a few people around your age who can't hear it and heck, it doesn't bother my dog at all. I can hear it though, but it's not nearly as annoying as another sound I heard in a poorly recorded mp3 that the same people can't hear (also that insanely awful one at the end of a feedback loop)... If he spent over half a grand on this particular sound, he's retarded. He should have asked some young people which sounds annoy them more. Of course, they would have lied, but still...

      --
      Sendou Wave Kick!!
    5. Re:I hear nothing? by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

      In the MP3 found around there, all I could hear was people milling around. I'm 18 and I don't often listen to incredibly loud music. My guess is our computer speakers can't play that frequency, since in physics class I was able to hear extremely high pitch noise that, say, my teacher couldn't. I don't usually hear televisions anymore though, they used to drive me nuts if there wasn't any audio on. Not a bad thing, in my book =P

    6. Re:I hear nothing? by fandog · · Score: 1

      Just learned my $10 pc speakers top out at 14k Hz. (apparently 6k too low) Is it just like a high warble or what?

    7. Re:I hear nothing? by fandog · · Score: 1

      Oh, found some headphones...

          It's not that bad, it's just that "TV turned on" high-pitched sound modulated up and down a bit... I think you could get used to living next to it if you didn't know it was there to annoy you. ie: if you had a brand-new 100" flat screen TV that made that noise, you'd probably gladly live with it. :)

      I was expecting something much more annoying like two tones half a step off (musically) or something.

    8. Re:I hear nothing? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Just learned my $10 pc speakers top out at 14k Hz. (apparently 6k too low)

      According to the frequency analysis in audacity there are peaks at 15.7KHz and 16.4KHz and it falls off pretty rapidly outside of that range.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    9. Re:I hear nothing? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      I DO have cheap headphones, I didn't think of trying on my speakers. Of course, I also have a constant ringing in my ears (fortunately only noticeable when it's dead silent).

    10. Re:I hear nothing? by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      I can't hear any odd noise either.

      But I've been to plenty of concerts, and worked at a music festival 3 years in a row.

      But I can still hear high-pitched noises elsewhere...

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    11. Re:I hear nothing? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Maybe your speakers don't reproduce that frequency? I can hear it and I'm in my 20s...

  28. Noise Cancelling by CompotatoJ · · Score: 5, Funny
    You could try setting up a device (such as a stereo or computer speakers) which cancels out the noise which I believe is 17KHz. If you emit the exact opposite sound, they will cancel out each other. It uses the same principle as noise-cancelling headphones. I hope this ASCII drawing of how the waves will interact helps:
    Mosquito Wave: /^\/^\/^\

    Opposite Wave: \_/\_/\_/

    = Combination: ---------
    1. Re:Noise Cancelling by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe the parent was supposed to be funny. This really is how sound waves work.

    2. Re:Noise Cancelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      You got the last line wrong:
      Mosquito Wave: /^\/^\/^\

      Opposite Wave: \_/\_/\_/

      Result: everyone's happy: \o/ \o/ \o/
    3. Re:Noise Cancelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really. For this to work, you would have to hit exactly the same frequency and opposite amplitude. Which is a bit of a problem, if your 'cancelling wave' emitter sits in a different place than the original source as the amplitude decreases with distance from the source. Now try to imagine two sources and where their amplitudes would match (possibly on a plane somewhere between them, definitely not in the whole space).

    4. Re:Noise Cancelling by kula.shinoda · · Score: 1

      The _same_ sound in fact, just phase-shifted by half. So just buy another mosquito wave generator and experiment.

      --
      Real men don't write sigs
    5. Re:Noise Cancelling by jmv · · Score: 1

      Actually, active noise cancellation at 17 kHz is nearly impossible to do because the wavelength is too small (~2cm). Cancelling the noise would mean tracking each of you ears to millimeter accuracy (and respond very quickly). I think most noise cancelling devices today are only effective up to a few hundred Hz.

    6. Re:Noise Cancelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We used to live next door to some Mexicans that celebrated late into the night with all that accordian music and whatever. I found that 15 seconds of "Eruption" by Van Halen at 200 watts with the speakers pointed at their house was effective at cancelling their noise.

    7. Re:Noise Cancelling by popeye44 · · Score: 1

      Well if these guys http://www.atcsd.com/ hadn't sold out to the military you could send noise cancelling sound back to the source. Unfortunately for us we'll probably not see this technology for a long while. I've been tracking it for around 3 years. Note that my use of selling out is an assumption because I know the Navy is using it, And second it was purported to do all sorts of things and suddenly I haven't heard a peep from them or any new technologies using it. In Fact Clarion has licensed it but nothing from them either. I read somewhere that soda machines in Hong Kong were using it on a test basis.. but even that rumor is 2 years old.

      --
      Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
  29. Apply System Engineering: Full Analysis by cmholm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Analysis: before implementing a solution, is to make sure you've got the full picture. Note that your neighbor is in fact being harassed by something, if not intentionally. What is that thing? If it's something you are doing... Trade Study: will it be a major or minor imposition to not do it; can you bring yourself to politely inform your neighbor that you'll not do it in exchange for taking the offending device offline?

    If either you or the neighbor doesn't want to deal: since you've already alerted the authorities that the device is an issue, I'd pass on petty crime or felony-based solutions you likely suspect, you. You and your neighors should keep a running record of your complaints to the police. You might try borrowing/buying a meter that'll measure the dB of the frequency in question. Then, while you can ask for a younger officer that can hear the noise, if you get someone my age, at least the officer will have something to go on.

    If you get the device taken offline without dealing with what's pissing your neighbor off, you may just be trading one headache for another.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    1. Re:Apply System Engineering: Full Analysis by Megane · · Score: 1

      Of course this assumes that said neighbor is in fact not just an antisocial asshole or delusionally paranoid, and that there actually is something specific going on causing a problem that can be stopped.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Apply System Engineering: Full Analysis by fermion · · Score: 1
      Is this a situation of young people moving into a old area. There are two common situations. First, the old area may be differently configured than the young people are used to. For instance smaller streets, less insulated houses, or the like. Are the roads narrow and now there are huge cars? Are you driving fast? Are you playing music loud like was acceptable at the apartment building? I hate to mention it, but are there beer cans on the lawn? Some people are just hypersensitive, and nothing can be done, but sometimes we have to adjust to live in civilized society.

      I also wonder if this person is just lonely. Has all this persons friend moved out so the young generation can live there? Does this person resent that fact? Did the young people move in like they were settlers, remaking the neighborhood in a new image, dismissing all that came before, or did they respect the effort it took to build the place that they now live.

      I have seen rational neighbors and irrational neighbors. I have seen neighbors intent on changing the culture of a place simply because they have the money to so do, and neighbors who take the time to talk to and help their elders. So I do not want to pass judgement, but as in world politics, a bit of genuine humble diplomacy can make problems disappear.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Apply System Engineering: Full Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course pretty much all previous discussion assumes the poster isn't an antisocial asshole or delusionally paranoid and that there actually isn't something specific going on causing a problem that can be stopped.

      As an "older" resident living too near a college campus, I can assure you that it's very possible for people who aren't on regular schedules to annoy those who are. Likely, actually. And it's not like anyone is really trying to be annoying, all it takes is a little empathic breakdown.

  30. Easy solution by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    Looks like it's an exterior device. Just hit it with paintballs... repeatedly.

    If it doesn't outright break, the paint might gum it up so that it doesn't work properly.

    1. Re:Easy solution by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      "wrist rocket" style slingshot with ball bearing ammunition.

      it will make short work of the device, and you can also shoot out a few windows firing bb's to get revenge

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  31. You call this a neighbor problem? by Tal+Cohen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Our neighbors are firing Katyusha rockets at us.

    --
    - Tal Cohen
    1. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Our neighbors are firing Katyusha rockets at us.

      And just like the guy in the article, you arn't doing anything to inflame the situation at all!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    2. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Trogre · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unfortunately it's not quite so simple.
      The situation can be summarised as follows:

      If the Arabs put down their weapons there would be peace.

      If the Israelis put down their weapons there would be genocide.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, sure, because we know that Israelis are the PICTURE of restraint around unarmed Arabs. Drop the victim act already, it doesn't score you any points because the rest of the world knows you're as dirty as the people you're fighting.

    4. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at least you've killed a thousand innocent people (your neighbours) in the last two weeks to make up for it.

      Israel's actions are disgusting. You should heed a warning though: Live by the sword, die by the sword.
      Technology advances quickly, and before too long, accurate guidance systems for those rockets will be easy to obtain - and then the death tolls on both sides will start to even up very quickly indeed.

      Now just imagine, that instead of invading a country, destroying their infrastructure, their homes, their villages, their livelihoods; instead of all that, if Israel had spent that same amount of money spent on warfare and murder to help fund the Lebanese army to get Syrian-led Hezbollah out of their country. Imagine if Israel had spent all those millions on helping their neighbours to develop, rather than destroying everything they have and acting surprised when they are resentful.

      Israel has just given rise to the next two generations of terrorists by their own actions. They have committed war crimes in Lebanon and Palestine, and the tragedy is that they could have worked with the UN and humanitarian groups and helped Palestine and Lebanon instead of hurting them.

      Whine somewhere else. Israel deserves international condemnation for their acts.

    5. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel's is allowed to defend itself.
      The 'thousands of innocent people' are Hezbollah's victims.

    6. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if I kill your son and kidnap your daughter, YOU should be punished for trying to rescue your daughter through violent means? WHOA! Do you have family, and where do you live?

    7. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO every single fucking arab and jew in the world needs to be put across someone's lap and given a good long hard spanking. You are all a bunch of retarded children playing with deadly toys. If I had the power, I'd airlift the lot of your fucktards out of the area and turn the middle east into a parking lot. I am SO fucking sick of your bullshit.

    8. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Israel deserves international condemnation for their acts.

      Says the oh-so brave and opinionated... Anonymous Coward. :)

    9. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No they are not. They are civilians, including women and children.

      Its widely recognised that the actions of Israel are in contravention of the Geneva Convention. Couple that with the reality that they HAVEN'T stopped the rockets coming over the border and you have a massive screwup on the Israeli part - which continues to happen purely because the average american has no concept of reality or what goes on outside their borders.

      American stupidity is becoming a major issue for the rest of the world. Too often its possible to trace back problems to that lack of education.

      Luckily that stupidity also results in such a massive deficit that the implosion of the whole country is just a matter of time.

    10. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mods: Please wait until after the ADL cabal mods the parent down, then mod parent the fuck UP.

    11. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >The situation can be summarised as follows:
      >
      >If the Arabs put down their weapons there would be peace.
      >
      >If the Israelis put down their weapons there would be genocide.

      Please consider:
      Both statements are assumptions. Facts can show otherwise.
      In the chicken and egg question of who started first the issue of land occupation is paramount.

    12. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by alfs+boner · · Score: 1
      Its widely recognised blah blah...

      By whom? These are weasel words. Please avoid using phrases like this.

      --
      Listen p*ssy. I'm sure your the same homo that posted earlier about alf's boner and you just want to remain anonymous fo
    13. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Some points to ponder:

      What do you think Israel stands to gain by attacking arabs (bearing in mind they're outnumbered on every side)?

      Why is Israel firing missiles into civilian locations in Lebanon? What else could be there?

      Where are the "return" rockets being fired from?

      Why do you think it is that Hezbollah exists? Where does it come from? What is its mission statement?

      Which small country was missing from a huge map of the Middle East displayed at a UN (yes, UN) meeting with Palestine? Why do you think this is?

      What is one of Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's favourite topics?

      Why is footage and photos we saw of civilian casualties in Afghanistan in 2002 now appearing in news stories about heavy civilian casualties in Lebanon?

      Why is Pallywood producing bulk footage of injured people on stretchers for sale to news networks? (especially when the injured people get up and walk off in the uncut footage)

      However answering the following question will answer most of the above:

      What are the core tenets of Islam?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    14. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      The fact that Arabs believe the same about the Israelis means that the situation is completely unsalvageable.

      I vote that both sides vacate the planet forthwith.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    15. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by iangoldby · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I hesitate over dignifying the above with a response, but I am utterly fed up with this kind of childish name-calling.

      As a Christian, I have no particular reason to defend Islam, but I've seen enough of attacks on religions where the attack is based entirely on the behaviour of a small minority who probably don't even deserve to be called followers of that religion in the first place.

      So, to put the record straight, in response to your question "What are the core tenets of Islam?":

      1. "I testify that there is no god but God (Arabic:Allah) and I testify that Muhammad is the Messenger of God."

      2. Prayer five times a day.

      3. Personal resonsibility to give alms to the poor.

      4. Fasting during the month of Ramadan.

      5. A pilgrimage to Mecca at least once.

      (Information taken from Wikipedia.)

      Not much there about calling for the destruction of Israel or supporting terrorists, is there?

      Now the question remains: "Do the leaders of the political state of Israel and their supporters, based on their recent actions, deserve to be called Jews?"

    16. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do the leaders of the political state of Israel and their supporters, based on their recent actions, deserve to be called Jews?"

      Sure, if their mothers were Jews. :)

    17. Re: You call this a neighbor problem? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > MHO every single fucking arab and jew in the world needs to be put across someone's lap and given a good long hard spanking.

      Don't overgeneralize. Not everyone in those groups is behaving badly.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    18. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately it's not quite so simple.
      The situation can be summarised as follows:

      If the X put down their weapons there would be peace.

      If the Y put down their weapons there would be genocide.


      And the problem is that X is always us and Y is always them, and everyone believes this to be true, and so won't put down their arms.

      Matter of fact is, both sides are extremely wrong and beyond any legitimacy in the mentioned conflict. Just cut it off and start trying to actually take your obligations seriously.

    19. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      What do you think Israel stands to gain by attacking arabs (bearing in mind they're outnumbered on every side)?

      Judging from the last 40 years, more land to colonize.

      Why is Israel firing missiles into civilian locations in Lebanon? What else could be there?

      Not a valid excuse to bomb a civilian airport (air blockade can easily be kept without this, so no, it does in no way whatsoever serve any military purpose), harbors (sea blockade can be maintained without this destruction easily), foundations of already destroyed bridges (they are already destroyed, want to make it very difficult to rebuild them afterwards as well obviously), civilian vehicles leaving southern lebanon etc etc etc etc.

      Or how about hitting a UN post, being told you are firing at a UN post, responding to it saying you'll stop, then not stopping, getting told the same thing over and over for another 6 hours, refusing to hold fire, and then afterward claim it is an accident?

      Not being carefull to hit valid targets is not being carefull to hit valid targets. That Hezbollah hides among the population in no way validates the targets mentioned above, and in no way removes the requirement for proper targetting.

      Where are the "return" rockets being fired from?

      So get those. They weren't being fired from the TV towers in northern Lebanon however...

      Why do you think it is that Hezbollah exists?

      Hezbollah exists as a response to the 1982 Israeli invasion and occupation of Lebanon. Incidentely, the people who started Hezbollah were initially happy with that Israeli invasion. It is only after Israel failing to protect the population of that occupied territory and failed to provide for them, that the local population of southern Lebanon started feeling they had to kick Israel out of there and Hezbollah was born.

      Where does it come from?

      You want to hear Iran, right? guess what: YOU ARE WRONG.
      Yes, it definitely gets support in many ways from Iran, but Hezbollah originates in Lebanon

      What is its mission statement?

      It has many, but if you mean destruction of Israel, that is one of them.

      Which small country was missing from a huge map of the Middle East displayed at a UN (yes, UN) meeting with Palestine? Why do you think this is?

      Excuse me? there is no country or nation called Palestine, so its representatives cannot be having meetings with the UN.

      Palestine is a territory, containing Israel and some areas around it.

      What is one of Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's favourite topics?

      He is dangerous lunatic, no more and no less. However, if the USA and its friends don't understand that all they are achieving with their attitude is to drive people into the arms of such idiots then they have themselves to blame for the problem. You may not realize this, but much of the US hatred in Iran originates in US support for the Sjah before the Islamic revolution.

      Why is footage and photos we saw of civilian casualties in Afghanistan in 2002 now appearing in news stories about heavy civilian casualties in Lebanon?

      Why is Pallywood producing bulk footage of injured people on stretchers for sale to news networks? (especially when the injured people get up and walk off in the uncut footage)


      Just like the Israeli press center has readily prepared material for all who want to pick it up, quite a bit of it of high propaganda and low truth value. Its all rubbish from both sides.

      However answering the following question will answer most of the above:

      What are the core tenets of Islam?


      You are just about as bad as that Iranian president. The difference is that he knows what he is talking about and doesn't believe a word of his own statements, whereas you seem to truely believe in the hatred and dis-information you are spreading.

    20. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Israel's is allowed to defend itself.

      Definitely.

      Current actions however do not qualify for defending itself, and hence are not justified by 'being allowed to defend itself'.

      The 'thousands of innocent people' are Hezbollah's victims.

      When you drop a bomb, you are responsible for it falling, hitting whatever it hits, it exploding, and the damage that results. There is NO WAY to blame anyone else for this.

    21. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      You know what is both funny, sad, and very telling for the entire situation...

      I have no clue on whoms side you are arguing here because both have done the (kidnapping people part and both have responded violently to the other side doing this...

    22. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, fence off that screwed up part of the world to them and not anyone leave it.

    23. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to calm down and re-read that post. You and the guy you responded to are on the same team, and you completely misinterpreted his entire post.

    24. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Not exactly, let me give you the 'desired' answers to those questions to show the difference..

      What do you think Israel stands to gain by attacking arabs (bearing in mind they're outnumbered on every side)?

      Security

      Why is Israel firing missiles into civilian locations in Lebanon? What else could be there?

      Hezbollah and their rockets

      Where are the "return" rockets being fired from?

      Civilian areas in Southern Lebanon.

      Why do you think it is that Hezbollah exists? Where does it come from? What is its mission statement?

      It comes from Iran, its purpose is to further the Islamic revolution in Arab controlled areas, and its mission statement is wiping Israel from the map.

      Which small country was missing from a huge map of the Middle East displayed at a UN (yes, UN) meeting with Palestine? Why do you think this is?

      No clue since as already argued there is no country of Palestine, so there can not have been such a meeting.

      What is one of Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's favourite topics?

      He has 2 actually.. Getting rid of Israel, and arguing about the non-existance of the holocaust. I'd rather say however his favorite subject is whatever will piss off the western world in general..

      Why is footage and photos we saw of civilian casualties in Afghanistan in 2002 now appearing in news stories about heavy civilian casualties in Lebanon?

      To infuriate those who see the footage.

      Why is Pallywood producing bulk footage of injured people on stretchers for sale to news networks? (especially when the injured people get up and walk off in the uncut footage)

      See above

      However answering the following question will answer most of the above:

      What are the core tenets of Islam?


      To bring the entire world under Islamic rule.

    25. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Our neighbors are firing Katyusha rockets at us.

      Some kids from our neighbourhood threw stones into the rich neighbourhood nearby. The people there responded by smashing our windows, destroying our cars, cutting off our electricty supply and beating up people at random.

      They called this a proportionate response.

    26. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, this is exactly the point of UN peacekeepers. They grab a force from, oh, India or Russia or China, someone neutral in all this, and patrol the border and border areas.

      However, Israel has resisted UN peacekeepers with all their power, because parts of their government doesn't fucking want peace. They want to end up with all of Palestine, or as much as possible. (Pretty much all of Palestine would be happier with UN troups than Israel troups in their streets.)

      The US has gone along with this, because part of our government wants continual wars in the Middle East, and Israel is the best possible flashpoint. Hence the support of both Israel and Palestine, although they keep having their work cut out to make Israel look like the saint and Palestine the villian, and the UN look like a bunch of anti-semitics.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    27. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      The really sad thing was, this war is a failure. Hezbollah is basically kicking Israel's ass. Israel has killing a lot of innocent people, and nearly destroyed Lebanon, but hasn't apparently harmed Hezbollah ability to operate at all. Meanwhile, it has raises Hezbollah's popular support, and seriously crippled the only thing keeping it in check, the Lebanon government, which cannot function without infrastructure.

      You know that joke 'The beatings will continue until morale improves.'? How about 'I will continue punching you in the face until the people fighting me surrenders.'.

      You might get pissed at the person they're looking for, if you don't approve of that person's actions. Key word 'might'. You also might not really care about that person's actions, or actually approve of them. (Remember, Hezbollah was providing various services to southern Lebanon that the government wasn't.)

      And if they keep punching you in the face, and refuse to stop long enough for you to give them the directions they need, or if you try to help them and they punch you some more, or if they then go and punch your mother in the face...welll...at some point, any empathy you might have with them is gone.

      We're well past that point. Israel has made a huge enemy of one county that, despite being occupied by them for a long time, actually kinda liked Israel, and was one of the few non-theocracies around there. They just had a houseguest they couldn't get rid of that liked to take potshots out their windows. Lebanon's a country that could have been an enemy of Israel, yet wasn't, or, at least, wasn't until right now, because Israel just burned down their fucking house, instead of, as you pointed out, working with them to get rid of said houseguest.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    28. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And? You never done anything uh? Riiight.

    29. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Seems they are looking at France for this one.. Hmm.. interesting since they have involvement in both sides of the conflict instead of no involvement at all. Sounds like the right choice for the job tho.

    30. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by lucerin · · Score: 1

      and i pose this question to you: do you deserve to be called a member of your ethnicity? jews are not just practioners of judaism, they are also a "race", much like the chinese, the english, the poles, or the kurds they just happen to have their own unique religion (that less than half actually practice (dont know the exact numbers))

    31. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by lucerin · · Score: 1

      personally, i think the rest of the world should just dome off the entire region, let them kill each other as they please

    32. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by iangoldby · · Score: 1

      I suppose that membership of a particular ethnic group is just a fact of background - there are no moral aspects to race. The same isn't true of religion. But in the case of Judaism the issue is blurred because we use the same word to refer to the race as we do to refer to the religion. Then there is the political state of Israel, which is neither a religion nor a race... In my previous post, I was referring exclusively to the religion, but I didn't make that clear.

      This kind of confusion is nothing new. John the baptist had this to say:

      "And do not think you can say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham. The axe is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire." (Matthew 3:9-10).

      Jesus had something similar to say - see John chapter 8.

      I'm not sure if any of this helps. I've no idea if the war-mongers in Israel claim to be jewish in the religious sense.

    33. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by lucerin · · Score: 1

      if you have no idea if the "war-mongers" claim to be religiously jewish, then why did you bring it up?

    34. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      The only problem with idea is that they may like the spanking.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    35. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by erlenic · · Score: 1

      However, Israel has resisted UN peacekeepers with all their power, because parts of their government doesn't fucking want peace.

      Yeah, or maybe they just don't want their children raped.

    36. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      No clue since as already argued there is no country of Palestine, so there can not have been such a meeting.

      *sigh*

      http://www.eyeontheun.org/view.asp?l=21&p=142

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    37. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      1. That is a publication from an extremely biassed organisation. I will not say it is false, but I will say that I have found no other
            sources mentioning that incident whatsoever, so I have zero reason to believe it being true, nor do I have any background information
            that can be verified by multiple sources.
            Reading through their online publications makes clear that any critical comment about Israel or any possibly supportive comment about
            Palestinian people is inmediately recorded as 'anti Israel stance of the UN' by this supposed eye on the UN. Also, the map in question
            is Arab in origin, but the pictures are way to unclear to say what is exactly on it and what is not.

      2. There is no country called Palestine, so the UN cannot be having a meating with the representatives of Palestine.
            There is however a Palestinian authority, maybe you meant those?
            Palestine is a territory, incidentely, a territory that covers all of Israel and some areas around it (West bank mostly)

      3. Again, this website is extremely biassed, to the point of calling one of the people present a suicide bomber.. Now, suicide bombers
            blow themselves up, and are not very capable of being present at a UN meeting afterward.. I guess using that kind of language helps
            'getting their point across' but clearly shows what this site is about.

      So.. come with some verifiable sources and background on this incident please, it is an interesting incident.

    38. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they rather have their friends from the SLA rape and kill Lebanese children instead.

    39. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      How the hell would UN peacekeepers in Palestine rape Israeli children? What is this, telepathic sexual assualt?

      Like I said, it's the Israelis that want to keep their military in Palestine instead of replacing them with UN peacekeepers in Palestine.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    40. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      It's not such much 'no involvement' as 'actually trusted by both side'. Someone who has a lot of Israel and Palestine interests is actually perfect for the job.

      The only countries that would really be ruled out are other Arab countries, or Muslim theocracies, by Israel, and America and possibly England, by Palestine. (Although England used to manage that whole area just fine.)

      It's not like they'd be fighting a war. The sole goal would be to keep the peace until Palestine can stand on its own.

      See, the problem here is that Palestine doesn't trust Israel, and I think they have a valid argument there with various Israeli actions in the past, like attempts to steal land and collective punishments. Yet Israel is in charge of maintaining order in Palestine. The second that became anyone else's responsiblity, tensions would dramatically decrease.

      Or, to put it another way, Israel adopted Palestine 50 years ago, and, frankly, it's not working out. Palestine has behavioral problems, and when it misbehaves, Israel beats it and locks it in the basement, and ocassionally one or both of them goes insane and starts hurting the other with assault weapons. I think we need to accept the fact that Israel is not the correct parent for Palestine at this point in time, and assign someone else. Anyone else. I think, and I could be wrong, but I think that within a decade or two we'd actually have a functioning goverment there.

      Of course, Palestine and Israel still need to work together, they are two countries intertwined and share many resources and infrastructure. I just want someone else to take over the 'maintain order' relationship. Israel is abusive, and Palestine has learned to hate them.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    41. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      It's not such much 'no involvement' as 'actually trusted by both side'. Someone who has a lot of Israel and Palestine interests is actually perfect for the job.

      Yep..

      The only countries that would really be ruled out are other Arab countries, or Muslim theocracies, by Israel, and America and possibly England, by Palestine. (Although England used to manage that whole area just fine.)

      Hmm, one could make a good argument that the current mess is at least partially a result of the teritorial mess that England left there.

    42. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Cadallin · · Score: 1
      Would you have told the Poles to do the same thing in 1938?

      Uh, no. The Israelis have stolen the homeland of an ethnic group through Brittish Imperial fiat and are waging a very literal war of genocide so they can keep. THEY are in the wrong. The Palestinians are fighting for survival, the any other arab groups involved are generally trying to aid them in this. Because what the israelis are doing is 100% wrong. Just as wrong as what the Nazis did to the Gypsies, Slavs, and Jews. The ONLY difference is that Israel is genociding slowing, a family farm in Gaza here, a bus load of students there, and 50 years later we have millions of palestian dead.

    43. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. The Israelis have stolen the homeland of an ethnic group through Brittish Imperial fiat

      They did indeed take a piece of land where other people were already living among a lot of jews. Matter of fact is that it wasn't their land of course.

      They took this land following a proposal dating back to the end of the Ottoman Empire. A proposal that would have provided for home countries for jews, palestinians and kurds. A plan that never got executed, except for the creation of the state of Israel some 30 years later. This happened despite attempts from the Brits to prevent it. You may want to read up a bit on that bit of history.

      Fact is also that jews have been living in what is now Israel for almost as long as history is being written, and it was by far the most logical place for a home country from that point of view.

      Regardless, people have been driven off their land, and the least that needs to happen is that those people get compensated for their losses. Israel is of course doing the exact opposite of this.

      and are waging a very literal war of genocide so they can keep. THEY are in the wrong. The Palestinians are fighting for survival,

      Fighting for survival does not legitimize things like attacking Israeli civilians. Those who do that are wrong regardless of their motivation (and yes, by the same token Israel is wrong in attacking civilian targets and possibly civilians themselves in Gaza and Lebanon as well regardless of their motivation).

      the any other arab groups involved are generally trying to aid them in this.

      Other Arabs only made things worse, not better.

      Because what the israelis are doing is 100% wrong.

      That does not change that what Palestinians are doing is wrong as well.

      Just as wrong as what the Nazis did to the Gypsies, Slavs, and Jews. The ONLY difference is that Israel is genociding slowing, a family farm in Gaza here, a bus load of students there, and 50 years later we have millions of palestian dead.

      And somehow the answer to that is hate of all jews and killing them regardless of where they are or what they support?

      You my friend are full of anger. Your anger is justified, but it clouds your judgements and as a result your conclusions are wrong.

      Oh, and if you want to compare things to Europe, you may want to put a lot more time into figuring out how Europe managed to put an end to 1000 (!!) years of war and territorial conflict between France and Germany.

      Also, read http://soapbox.bartsplace.net/article.php/20060720 023409472 to find out a bit more about what I think about this conflict. Just keep in mind that I don't really care about who is right or wrong, rather, I care about who is willing to actually solve something. In that both parties in the conflict are not doing too well.

    44. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Cadallin · · Score: 1
      Um, in what way does a fight for survival NOT justify killing (pretty much anyone as far as that goes). What the Palestinians are doing is RIGHT by any standard I can imagine. Self defense from a material threat to life and liberty is always justified.

      The Palestinians and the rest of the Arab world act as they do because they perceive (rightly or wrongly) that the rest of the world is against them. Now, I might be able to take your point of view of neutrality, except for a large list of issues including but not limited to:

      1. A concerted international campaign to deny any non-jewish victims of the holocaust recognition or memorial.

      2. A notable slander campaign against the Irish for their neutrality (for good reason) in the second world war.

      3. Millions of dollars in donations and advertising to the American polical radical right, and religious fundamentalist organizations, which scews politics in the USA in ways which materially affect me.

      The sum total of these issues swings my position from one of conflicted neutrality to "Fuck Israel. Free Palestine!" I don't care about jews that live elsewhere, I'm utterly uninterested annhilitating an ethnic group. I don't care about their religion (other than my general wish for reduced religiosity in the world, which applies equally to all monotheistic religions, as in my studied opinion Hinduism and Buddhism are pretty benign.)

      But the reality is that there will not be peace in the middle east while israel is in existance (even should they suceed in genociding the palestinian people inside the borders, Palestinian refugees are scattered throughout the world. There WILL be conflict there for hundreds of years. There is no option for peace that doesn't involve a free and independent Palestine (or a Pan-Arab nuclear/biological genocide, but I sincerely hope the rest of the world wouldn't stand by while that happened).

      As for the 1000 years of Fanko-Prussion conflict, THAT ended with Germany bombed into the stone age and all of western Europe allied in common fear of the Soviet Union with Germany additionally divided in half. Or are you under the delusion that there was some other cause? If the antics in the present day EU are any guide there really isn't that much keeping age old hostilities check. Although fear of US imperialism may definately help keep the EU together a while.

    45. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Um, in what way does a fight for survival NOT justify killing (pretty much anyone as far as that goes).

      If you hapen to be a muslim, then the Islamic code of war has some things to say about this.

      But in general, it does damage without helping a solution in any way, and that makes it illegitimate, and what is more, it gives more people a legitimate reason for revenge, just making the problem bigger and bigger.

      What the Palestinians are doing is RIGHT by any standard I can imagine. Self defense from a material threat to life and liberty is always justified.

      Self defense is justified, but self defense does not justify all means.

      The Palestinians and the rest of the Arab world act as they do because they perceive (rightly or wrongly) that the rest of the world is against them. Now, I might be able to take your point of view of neutrality, except for a large list of issues including but not limited to:

      I do understand why the Arab world feels about 'the west' as they do, and I don't blame them.

      1. A concerted international campaign to deny any non-jewish victims of the holocaust recognition or memorial.

      This is not correct, what is correct is that the jewish victims are considered more important then anything else. This is of course rubbish, and should be addressed for what it is, yet another 'superiority' claim by yet another people. It is as stupid and dangerous as previous such cases.

      2. A notable slander campaign against the Irish for their neutrality (for good reason) in the second world war.

      Interestingly, the country I am from tried to stay neutral during that war but couldn't. We managed in the first world war however, and got slandered in a similar way. You may notice that Sweden is getting the same thing as Ireland over their 2nd world war neutrality.

      But you may also notice that anyone who tries to take a neutral position in the Israel Palestinian conflict, is slandered in a similar way by both sides.

      It is a consequence of taking a neutral position in a very emotional (and violent) conflict.

      3. Millions of dollars in donations and advertising to the American polical radical right, and religious fundamentalist organizations, which scews politics in the USA in ways which materially affect me.

      As opposed to billions of dollars in donations from the Wahhabists which affect me and the country I live in directly?

      Pot, meet kettle. May I notice you have a similar color?

      The sum total of these issues swings my position from one of conflicted neutrality to "Fuck Israel. Free Palestine!"

      Only one of those issues directly relates to Israel Palestine conflict, that of financial support.
      However, I have never been neutral in this. I believe, and have always believed that those who lost out over the creation of Israel deserve compensation, and are the real victims of this conflict. I don't need to involve all kinds of external and unrelated issues in this.

      I don't care about jews that live elsewhere, I'm utterly uninterested annhilitating an ethnic group. I don't care about their religion (other than my general wish for reduced religiosity in the world, which applies equally to all monotheistic religions, as in my studied opinion Hinduism and Buddhism are pretty benign.)

      I can agree with that.

      But the reality is that there will not be peace in the middle east while israel is in existance (even should they suceed in genociding the palestinian people inside the borders, Palestinian refugees are scattered throughout the world. There WILL be conflict there for hundreds of years. There is no option for peace that doesn't involve a free and independent Palestine (or a Pan-Arab nuclear/biological genocide, but I sincerely hope the rest of the world wouldn't stand by while that happened).

      The problem is that what you describe here is more or less what happened to Israel and its people during roman times and thereafter. You su

    46. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by Cadallin · · Score: 1
      I'm not muslim, I'm an atheist Irish-American, who is in the rather small minority of being pro-palestine in the 'states.

      As an aside, just because I think its funny, it seems that trying to argue that Sweden is just as badly affected by Arab political machinations as the United States is by Israeli ones is kind of silly. You're annoyed by arab actions, the United States is made an internationally dangerous rogue state by the Israeli's.

      What's the life expectancy in Sweden? Infant mortality rate? Teenage Pregnancy rate? Income distribution? Healthcare availability? How many agressive wars has your country started in the last 50 years? Foreign Dictators installed? Military vs. Nonmilitary government spending? Oil use and general energy wastefulness?

      My point being that I think politics in the USA are screwed up enormously, with general quality of life statistics generally backing me up. And your climate's better too, from my perspective in the sub-tropics. I would trade US citizenship for Swedish any day of the week.

    47. Re:You call this a neighbor problem? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      I'm not muslim, I'm an atheist Irish-American, who is in the rather small minority of being pro-palestine in the 'states.

      Sadly enough there is indeed only a very tiny minority for that, and even worse, trying to say so is bound to get you quite some response..

      As an aside, just because I think its funny, it seems that trying to argue that Sweden is just as badly affected by Arab political machinations as the United States is by Israeli ones is kind of silly. You're annoyed by arab actions, the United States is made an internationally dangerous rogue state by the Israeli's.

      Uh, that was not what I was arguing. I was arguing that Sweden is similarely affected by slander over their neutrality in the second world war as Ireland is.

      For the rest, yes, I am 'annoyed' by certain 'Arab' actions, but unlike many, I don't respond by declaring them to be 'the enemy' as a result, just like I am quite annoyed by certain Israeli actions, but won't declare them the enemy as a result either.

      Then, the USA is in theory quite a powerfull country which Israel depends on directly. It is interesting how that resulted in Israel basicly dictating the foreign policy of the USA for as far as the middle east is concerned. This points at a very serious problem with the political system in the USA. You can blame Israel for bad intentions here, and I won't argue that. I will however point out that whatever the USA does with that is the responsibility of the USA government, and not of Israel.

      I do agree btw that the USA with its current government is acting like a rogue state. (and yet, I won't see all 'Americans' as evil as a consequence)

  32. still out of luck, time for plan B or C. by twitter · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Most noise laws would not ban a mosquito device. I've seen people defeated with noise meters on the front porch of their house next to a frat party going full blast. While annoying to any normal person, it was not illegally loud.

    Your best chances are to be a little less paranoid and irritable yourself. Did he tell you he was out to get you or did you imagine that? He might really just be out to get the bugs? Offer to buy him a better model bug zapper. How could he refuse an offer like that? Of course, you could be right and he hates you for no good reason and you will have to learn to live with it. He can buy as many zappers as you break and get you arrested besides. In that case, drink another beer and turn the music up another notch.

    The general rule is that being friendly in the first place is cheap, confrontation is expensive, and ignoring the problem makes it go away.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:still out of luck, time for plan B or C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He might really just be out to get the bugs?"

      erm, mosquito is the name of the product. It's a "youth deterrent system".

      In other words, it has one, and only one, purpose: pissing off people whose ears work.

    2. Re:still out of luck, time for plan B or C. by Rudolf · · Score: 4, Informative
      He might really just be out to get the bugs? Offer to buy him a better model bug zapper.

      If you follow the link in the story, you'd see that the neighbor in question did not install an insect control device (bug zapper) but rather something specifically designed to annoy young people and drive them away. (Mosquito is the brand name). From the link:

      The Mosquito ultrasonic teenage deterrent ... With an effective range of between fifteen and twenty meters Compound Security Devices field trials have shown that teenagers are acutely aware of the Mosquito and usually move away from the area within just a couple of minutes.....Mosquito ultrasonic deterrent can solve your problem.


      Did he tell you he was out to get you...?

      Based on the device the guy installed, I think it goes without saying.

    3. Re:still out of luck, time for plan B or C. by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Try reading the article first, the device has nothing whatsoever to do with insects, besides the name.

  33. I can relate... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny
    I can relate...

    Two years ago, the building next to mine was being totally renovated (they gutted everything but the outside walls).

    And they had that big honking alarm that would go off each time a cat or a bird would go inside the structure.

    Of course, it went off at 2 in the morning many times.

    After a few weeks, we got to get pretty pissed at it, so I started to grab a pair of cutters, and enter the place despite it being barricaded (from the third floor, the balconies of the respective buildings are only 2 feet away). Then it's just a matter of finding the wire and snipping it.

    Of course, they would fix it, until the next snip...

    The last time I did it (at 3 in the morning), I was so pissed that I cut the wire in about 200 one inch long little sections. This must have drove the message home because that's the last time we heard the fucking alarm...

    1. Re:I can relate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someonw who has experienced major vandalism, including having all the windows broken out in a house we owned that was gutted and even amateur attempts at burning it down, i find your actions to be criminal. If you don't like the alarm tell the guy about it and that it is bird and such setting it off so he can take actions to prevent entry to those birds and such.

      Your actions, on the other hand in disabling his security could have easily led to others causing more damage or even burning the place and, if the place has been vacant long enough, it is quite likely that there would have been no insurance on it, because no one would cover it if it was vacant.

    2. Re:I can relate... by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As someonw who has experienced major vandalism, including having all the windows broken out in a house we owned that was gutted and even amateur attempts at burning it down

      I live in a city, and I think most alarms are simply pacifiers that serve no real purpose. Think about it; If the alarm went off numerous times and nobody ever came, then there obviously wasn't any enforcement. Someone could do whatever they want anyway. An alarm that doesn't summon a person around is next to useless. It won't stop someone from breaking your windows (nobody's going to come), and it won't stop them from burning the building down (can be done from outside). If the alarm summoned the cops every time it went off, it would at least provide some security, and I'm sure the construction company would have fixed its sensitivity, since then it would cost them money for all the false alarms.

      If you don't like the alarm tell the guy about it and that it is bird and such setting it off so he can take actions to prevent entry to those birds and such.

      You're assuming he didn't ask them already. He very likely did ask them, and they "didn't see a problem" (since they weren't there at night). I would also like to know the fantasy city you live in where construction companies care what "the neighbors" think anyway. Where I live, they run jackhammers first thing in the morning, large generators all day (often away from where they work but next to someone else's place), and pour excess concrete in the gutter, partially ruining the street.

    3. Re:I can relate... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that leave concrete behind in the gutter? How is it the contractor has never been taken to task for that? Corruption?

    4. Re:I can relate... by DingerX · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's a very effective burglar alarm indeed that allows someone to come in to the building, snip the cable in 200 places, and leave, with nobody seeing a thing. "All I heard was that blasted alarm going for half an hour. Then it stopped, and everyone cheered. I also don't know who the 3-dozen people in the street were, dousing gasoline on the control unit and setting it ablaze." And sorry, it's not the neighbors' duty to inform the idiot who owns the alarm that it's improperly configured. Likewise, it's not the state's duty to point out that driving a four-wheeled vehicle with only 3 wheels attached is unsafe and contrary to the highway code. Your best ally in crime prevention are your neighbors. If you can't trust your neighbors, or if your neighbors actively hate you, no amount of mosquitoes and fences is gonna help.

    5. Re:I can relate... by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Yes, my road has a light gray gutter now, with bumps where parked car's tires were. I don't know how much is actually in the storm sewer, but I feel sorry for whoever has to clean that out next time. The work was done by a private contractor working on someone's house, and they were gone after a few days. Most of the mess left was in their process of leaving (I'd be loathe to call it "cleaning up"). If it was a city crew I would have complained, and perhaps something would have been done.

    6. Re:I can relate... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      As someonw who has experienced major vandalism, including having all the windows broken out in a house we owned that was gutted and even amateur attempts at burning it down, i find your actions to be criminal. If you don't like the alarm tell the guy about it and that it is bird and such setting it off so he can take actions to prevent entry to those birds and such.
      The guys were nowhere to be found; during the day, when we are away at work, they are there, working. But when we come home, no-one is there to be seen. And the rare times there is someone, you can bet your arse it was a major-league buck-passing exercise. In any case, an alarm was not warranted at all.

      The neighbourhood is as crimeless as it can be. The last murder, for example, happenned about 15 years ago. And to illustrate that security is not needed, accross the street, they are building a supermarket, and the building site is totally devoid of fences, alarms, guard-dogs and security guard, yet everyone goes through the place as a shortcut to the subway station or between two railroad crossings.

      The nearby farmer's market produce stands are only covered with tarpaulins when the market is closed; when I have yankee visitors, I always make a point at walking in the closed market, late at night (when we come back from the bierstube) and they just can't believe it (yet, we're a day's drive from the US federal capital).

      Your actions, on the other hand in disabling his security could have easily led to others causing more damage or even burning the place and, if the place has been vacant long enough, it is quite likely that there would have been no insurance on it, because no one would cover it if it was vacant.
      What part of "a building being reconstructed" don't you get? This is as vacant as a scatholic church council when a jamborree is happenning!!!!
    7. Re:I can relate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, to demonstrate the security WAS needed, some jackass cut their wiring into 200 1-inch segments.

    8. Re:I can relate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --"I live in a city, and I think most alarms are simply pacifiers that serve no real purpose."

      Can't speak for anyone else, but I do have a home alarm, and it's monitored. It's only gone off once so far (with good reason to), and the monitoring company called me on my cell phone in less than a minute.

    9. Re:I can relate... by DavidTC · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, no, alarms are serious business.

      For example, when a car alarm goes off, that means someone is trying to steal it. It might have scared them away temporarily, but they'll certainly be back to steal the car.

      And, remember, it is legal to commit a lesser crime to prevent a larger one. For example, to stop felony grand theft auto, feel free to commit misdemeanor vandalism by slashing the tires of the car, keeping that pesky car thief from making off it with it. You might want to slash two of them, as most cars have spares in the trunk, and obviously car thiefs can get in there if they can get inside the car to set off the alarm. (Surely they have to get inside the car, no one would be crazy enough to have an alarm that goes off when people merely touch a car.)

      When the car owner finally shows up, he'll be very grateful that his car is still there. If you have time, though, you might want to leave a note for him that says the time his alarm went off, and telling him that he should have the police dust the inside of the car for fingerprints to try to track down the thieves. But I like to be an anonymous hero, walking past with a quick bend-and-slash, stroll to the next wheel, bend-and-slash, saving their car, and walking off with the mere satifaction of a job well done being my only reward.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    10. Re:I can relate... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      This was almost funny enough to warrant me modding it up, but you went a bit beyond my sarcasm threshold.

      Better luck next time!

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    11. Re:I can relate... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      You should still complain - it's probably the responsibility of the guy who had the work done to actually clean up afterwards. Sucks, but them's the breaks.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    12. Re:I can relate... by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      I was referring to unmonitored alarms (or alarms monitored in theory but not in practice). There are a lot of things in a city that make noise and summon no one. Monitored alarms have real value, as any bank could probably tell you.

  34. Do this by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's the plan:

    1. Spend the next 30-40 years breeding and training vicious attack dogs
    2. Now you're over 40 and can hear it any more. (Plus, everyone loves dogs -- bonus.)

    It's foolproof.

    1. Re:Do this by mclipsco · · Score: 1

      ok using Slashdot math: if you are "now over 40" 30 to 40 years from now, does that mean you are 0 to 10 when you start this little puppy training camp?

      --
      Take off every 'SIG'!!
    2. Re:Do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you start with, say, 35, and add 40, is this somehow less than 40?

    3. Re:Do this by vga_init · · Score: 1

      This is one of the most clever things I've read in a long time. Bravo!

    4. Re:Do this by NIVRAM · · Score: 1

      Except for two things

      1) The dogs will be able to hear it and will be annoyed as well
      2) The old person should be dead in that amount of time... problem solved.

  35. Some Suggestions by Kuukai · · Score: 1

    What I would do if I were you is pretend that the thing stopped working/you got used to it (you can make him guess at which). Cut through his grass, chat on his sidewalk, play hockey next door, etc. Keep your cool, irritate him and help realize all his greatest fears about youngins without breaking a single law. It might take some willpower, but if you can convince him it isn't working at all, he'll probably either get rid of it or replace it, at which point you can continue annoying him and ignoring it until he either runs his nest egg dry on these overpriced pieces of crap or gives up...

    Alternatively, you could just wait it out. You can expedite the process by going to rock concerts every night and working part-time in a bell tower.

    One last suggestion would be to do something extremely annoying yet legal back at him, like Christmassing up the side of your house that faces him with 300 watt lights and focusing mirrors at night. If he calls the cops, tell them it "faces Mecca" or something, they'll love that...

    --
    Sendou Wave Kick!!
    1. Re:Some Suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cut through his grass
      Last time I checked, that's trespassing.
  36. a la by sockman · · Score: 1

    in the manner of

    sure, perhaps my grammar was poor, but for american english it's just fine. you should read "Eats, Shoots & Leaves" since you really care so much.

    1. Re:a la by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I have read it. You'd do better to read it, although I don't recall it dealing with your deficiencies specifically. I think it mentions capitalization.

    2. Re:a la by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, perhaps my grammar was poor, but for american english it's just fine.

      No, it's not, unless you are making the claim that because you are American, people think you are stupid already, so it's not worth the effort to express yourself properly.

      Although your grammar is bad, what Eideewt was referring to is the fact that you were using a phrase that you didn't know the meaning of, in a way that made no sense. That's not a grammar problem, that's an ignorance problem. The same goes for "voilà", which you apparently meant when you typed "viola", which is a musical instrument. The fact that you're speaking American English rather than another dialect is totally meaningless, American English doesn't have special meanings for these things.

      Why are you suggesting that he reads Eats, Shoots & Leaves? Clearly it is you that is in need of education in the English language.

      A rule of thumb that stops you from looking very stupid is that you shouldn't use words or phrases that you don't know the meaning of.

  37. Don't get mad, get even by zbuffered · · Score: 1

    With your very own HERF Gun! Send this guy back to the 30's from the comfort of your own hDISCONNECTED

    --
    Synergy is your friend
  38. fact by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    fact: if his house burns down the device will no longer funtion

    i do not advocate any particular aciton, i am merely pointing out an obvious fact.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  39. overly obvious answer? by Kargan · · Score: 1

    Well, since he can't hear it, apparently, why don't you just wait for him to leave home or go to sleep, then go turn it off?

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
  40. Whippersnappers ... by Infernal+Device · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe you kids oughtta stay off his damn lawn ...

    --
    "My God...it's full of trolls!"
  41. Get it wet with a super soaker water pistol. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be the juvenille and have a big water pistol fight and inadvertantly get the thing really good and wet if it just happens to be outside. If he complains to the police that you stopped it from working, then he is the one who is then going to have to explain to the police what it did in the first place.

  42. burn it by dindi · · Score: 1

    10 Walk in, (the garden/home) pour gas, drop lighter ...

    20 confirm if device is gone
    30 sleep
    40 if sound.isOn goto 10

    1. Re:burn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution's so BASIC!!

    2. Re:burn it by dindi · · Score: 1

      you got my hidden message :)

  43. My, my, my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU are a real DICK.

    Must SUCK to be YOU.

  44. Don't get even, get BIGGER! by Dark+Coder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Alrighty, so the old sap is deaf?

    Just breed Asian tiger mosquitoes and unleash them using one of those geek-garage motion-detected trap release mechanism to your collection jar.

    These Aedes albopictus varmits are HUGE and fairly impervious to ultrasonic.

    1. Re:Don't get even, get BIGGER! by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Again, "mosquito" is only the brand name of the device, read the article.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  45. OUCH! by garyrich · · Score: 1

    Hey! I'm 48 and that is still ringing in my left ear. I have a headache behind my left eye now, and I'm not being sarcastic. Use that as a ringtone anywhere near me and I will break your phone. If a neighbor of mine had that sound going 24/7 and wouldn't turn it off he'd be in for a world of hurt.

    The sound reminds me of a high pitched shriek that made it impossible for me to get near some malls when I was a kid. Best guess was that it was coming from the escalators. This mosquito sound is a lot lower pitch than that, but the same grating shrieking quality. I'm glad I'm too old to hear that one anymore, I suspect it's still there.

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:OUCH! by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Funny
      What you might have been hearing was the ultrasonic alarm system. Apparently, in some stores and malls, the way the system was improperly installed was that the transducer was left on ALL the time, wired continuously on, and the normal mode of operation was merely to turn the alarm detection portion on at night and off in the morning upon entering. Bad dumb design. When I was in my 30s, some stores were painful to enter because of these. I discovered I could hear tones above 20KHz especially if they were at 110-120 dB levels, which these stupid transducers emitted. I'm over 50 now, and I can hear the mosquito tone easily too. I've always protected my hearing and avoided anything like loud rock concerts, and it seems to have paid off well. No, I'm not making this up or lying either.

      Also, pet stores should not ever have ultrasonic store alarms, because rodents can hear them and the sound is very painful. These will kill gerbils from stress. Disclosure: I am not a gerbil, descended from a gerbil, or use gerbils for unnatural purposes, at least not that often.

    2. Re:OUCH! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps this is a method that the teenagers can use to bring about a legal redress for the harrasment, rather than breaking the device. Bring in the RSPCA or whatever local society covers animal welfare in that area. Animal cruelty might get more press than teenager-cruelty.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:OUCH! by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good idea, actually... just find a friend with a seeing eye dog and have them try to enter the area. That would then involve all kinds of equal access laws, to your benefit. And my cats and dogs hated that sound, even just coming from my headset.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    4. Re:OUCH! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      What?

      Are you suggesting that teenagers are rodents? Or at the very least, non human?

      I suppose you won't have been the first person to go there, but I think the various Societies for Prevention and Cruelty to Animals won't touch the issue of theoretically abused teenagers with a cattle prod.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:OUCH! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Ah, read the grandparent. We were talking about how the device distresses animals.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  46. A couple suggestions by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    First, Play heavy metal really fucking loud. Of course, the police CAN hear this so it might not be a good idea.

    Second, Kill power to his house.

    On a more serious note, go get a sensor that can read noise at that frequency (will a normal decibel meter work? Try it if you have one). Anyway, then call the police and show them the meter.
    Also, if you can prove that he is doing this, then sue him for possible hearing damage.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  47. Shame by cachimaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude! some crazy old man Pwned j00!! ROFL!

  48. easy solution by foQ · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So this old guy can't hear the thing, huh? Unplug it! He'll never know and you can get back to being a hoodlum with no fear of reprisals. Or you could light his social security checks on fire.

  49. MicroWave by cachimaster · · Score: 1

    Seriusly, take apart a microwave oven, get the magnetron, and aim it to his house.
    If the mosquito device dont get fried, his brains will.

  50. A sound level meter won't help by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

    This thing won't produce a reading on a standard sound level meter. There's a standard bandwidth weighting ("A-law") for sound level meters, based on data about hearing damage, and it cuts off at only 8KHz. That's the definition used in most noise ordnances.

    1. Re:A sound level meter won't help by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      Hi Animats
      I saw the other guy who replied that you were wrong to use the term A-law, but you were close: what you mean is A weighing: http://www.coleparmer.com/techinfo/techinfo.asp?ht mlfile=SelectingSoundMeters.htm&ID=694

  51. SPAM SPAM SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign him up to every mailing list catalog, political group, religious groups, sales function and so forth that would visit his home for a sales pitch or send him junk mail. That's "noise" that he can understand. :-)

  52. Legal Standpoint by JJJJust · · Score: 1

    I say, as from a non-technological standpoint, but a legal one... Get a petition and have him cited for disturbing the peace. Most/some places have laws about sounds that radiate constantly past the grounds of the property.

  53. The solutions of solutions by CrashRoX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If war is what he wants, war is what he will get! This is sure to drive him more nuts then the mosquitoes from his little ultra violet toy... Which by the way is about 5 times as costly as my solution. Use with extreme caution... The device I speak of is called "sonic nausea". This is the blurb from their site: "Sonic Nausea is a small electronic device which can really turn one's stomach. It generates a unique combination of ultra-high frequency sound waves which soon leads most in its vicinity to queasiness. It can also cause headaches, intense irritation, sweating, imbalance, nausea, or even vomiting. Hiding this device in your inconsiderate neighbors house might put an end to their late night parties. The abusive bureaucrat's office, the executive lunchroom... the possibilities are endless for that small portion of inventive payback. The unique soundwave characteristics make directional source determination difficult. Powered by one 9-volt battery (not included). For extended run time two AA batteries in a battery pack with transistor clips (available from most electronics stores) can be used instead. Use with discretion." Only $49.99!!! - http://www.telstarone.com/cs_sonic_nausea.htm If you do go with this method, please post a follow up or pictures :)

  54. I call bullshit by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There's no way the little beeper in a phone would be able to reproduce the sound. For one thing the audio stage would filter it off, and it's unlikely the compression used would let anything that high through. Furthermore, if they want to be alerted to SMSes without their teacher hearing, why not stick their phone on vibrate?

    1. Re:I call bullshit by Stellian · · Score: 5, Interesting
      There's no way the little beeper in a phone would be able to reproduce the sound.
      Well, I've just tried that mp3 ringtone on my K750i Sony Ericsson, and I can hear it very clearly from the other room. On the other hand, my 54 y/o mom can't, and my 29 y/o brother sais it's faint. In 24 myself.
      That sound is only 15 KHz, and the mp3 has 48Khz sampling rate. And the buzzer in the mobile is perfectly able to reproduce high frequencies, it's the low freqs that cannot be reproduced.
    2. Re:I call bullshit by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      Because everybody can hear it when a phone on vibrate goes off. Especially if you leave it on your desk.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    3. Re:I call bullshit by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1
      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    4. Re:I call bullshit by berashith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yup, My wife is a teacher and had one of these go off in her classroom. When she asked who the phone belonged to, she got a response of " you can hear that ?" . Pretty funny I thought. This led us to play with the tone. On her computer, with crap generic ten year old standard dell speakers, we could both hear the annoying tone. My computer has a much nicer sound card and speaker set up, and while I could not detect a difference in the tone, she was not able to tell if I was playing the tone or not.

      Speaker quality is a must to recreate that sound.

    5. Re:I call bullshit by TBone · · Score: 3, Informative

      Call bullshit if you like, but Cingular sells 7 of them, in increasing frequencies, on their CingularExtras site.

      We run that site at work, so of course, we've tested them all. Most of us back in Operations can hear the first 4, with the exception of 3 guys - 2 in their late 30's, and one in his mid-20's. Those of us that can hear it (8 of us) range from early 20's to late 30's. About half of us can hear the 5th one. A couple of us can at least tell that the 6th one is doing something (including me at 32), and only the mid-20 year old guys can hear the 7th one.

      --

      This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U

    6. Re:I call bullshit by eric.t.f.bat · · Score: 1

      If you're trying for credibility, do some research first. Maybe the ringtones can't possible work; maybe they can and do; maybe it's all caused by pixies. "I call bullshit" has no value at all as a comment; "I call bullshit and here's a respectable information source to back me up" is useful.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable .sig block which this margin is too small to conta
    7. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no way the little beeper in a phone would be able to reproduce the sound.

      Only used to stone-age phones?

      why not stick their phone on vibrate?

      Hasn't read the comment he's replying to?

      You're American, aren't you?

    8. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 35, and I could hear the sound played through my computer speakers. It kind of made me want to go poo.

    9. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a complete retard? We're talking about ringtones, not the voice portion of the call. Including even a basic HPF for the ringtone portion is retarded when the speaker is obviously of such low quality to do the job itself...

    10. Re:I call bullshit by k8to · · Score: 1

      As a 32 year old who as attended far too many loud concerts, I can hear that crap loud and clear and it's annoying. Please don't follow the hype and engage super annoying ringtones, okay?

      --
      -josh
    11. Re:I call bullshit by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      Oh no! The dreaded Brown Note! Only on the other end of the frequency range.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_note

    12. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At work we tried this on several people over two different days. Different reactions with age, but a few people are very sensitive to the computer speakers test. Not so much to the real downloadable ringtone. People in their late 30s and above were not very lucky to hear the tone. --We tried this on our 50ish Chief Information officer, a somewhat feared figure at work, and he didn't notice over the round of conversation that we pretended to be having.

      Many teachers are in their mid twenties here in New York (public schools, at least) and you didn't mention your wife's age. Thus, my teacher friends would notice with little problem. People who are in their 50s, besides the real implication of hearing range loss, probably don't even know of mp3 ringers other than their defaults. TV news help to give them awareness, but it doesn't help if you can't physically hear the sound due to age.

      PS: new speakers for the wife would be nice even if she's never asked :) Then again, maybe her exposure to nothing more than "crap generic speakers" is the reason her hearing is good enough to catch the Mosquito ringer.

    13. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "American" covers pretty much all of North and South America. Get a clue, bigot.

      If you meant "You're from the U.S.A., aren't you?" my reply is "The U.S.A. invented the Internet, and it's a damn shame they had to share it with you."

    14. Re:I call bullshit by berashith · · Score: 1

      For the record, she is under forty but more than twice any of the student's ages. If I voulnteered her real age I don't think that buying new speakers would get me out of the jam...

    15. Re:I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. Well, thanks for replying. It will be interesting at work when I tell them I've heard the ringtones don't fool everyone, since we all found the topic so interesting an unfair. Slashdot diversity, being that you have a teacher nearby in this case, is nice :)

      Later. And yes, on restrospect, I wasn't asking for an exact age. You predicted what would happen by such a breach of contract ;)

      OK, must go to bed

    16. Re:I call bullshit by borgasm · · Score: 1
  55. buy some real mosquitos by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Ask a local university how to grow/harvest 100000000 mosquitos and release them in his house. Though they do travel 1000ft at night, it might be anoying
    to all, so get like 100000 termites

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  56. Why don't you try... getting along? by Frangible · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Do you truly think the best option is further conflict? Getting legal authorities involved? Going to court?

    Why don't you try talking to the guy-- listen to him-- this simple act will make him more comfortable with you. Apologize to him. Buy him a gift. Show kindness.

    Which is of more value to you-- an empty, hollow sense of victory that will bring you no satisfaction, even if it does occur, or peace?

    "Whenever you are confronted with an opponent, conquer him with love." -Mahatma Gandhi

    "Suppose someone, to annoy, Provokes you to do some evil act. Why allow anger to arise and thus Do exactly as he wants you to do? If you get angry Then maybe he will suffer, maybe not. But by feeling anger yourself You certainly do suffer." "For in this world, Hatred is never appeased by more hatred; It is love that conquers hatred. This is an eternal law." -The Buddha

    1. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall Ghandi got shot...

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    2. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by Frangible · · Score: 3, Informative

      "I believe that Gandhi's views were the most enlightened of all the political men in our time. We should strive to do things in his spirit: not to use violence in fighting for our cause, but by non-participation in anything you believe is evil." "Generations to come will scarcely believe that such a one as this walked the earth in flesh and blood." -Albert Einstein

    3. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by bdwebb · · Score: 1

      Of course...love of Hitler DEFINITELY influenced his decision to wipe out Jews. Gandhi and Buddha were TOTALLY right!! Especially since the majority of Germans under Hitler's rule embraced his notions of the Master Race. Gandhi and Buddha are dead and didn't accomplish much with their life other than providing an opposite end to the spectrum of 'violence solves all'. The only lesson this teaches us is that balance is necessary. Not balance between good and evil, but a 'breaking point' of sorts that is necessary for humanity to move forward without killing itself.

      You represent one extreme of the spectrum and you're right in some ways:

      If everyone just got along there would be no violence.
      If everyone loved one another we would have harmony and tranquility.

      You're forgetting that even though humans may believe in fantasies, every single human on the face of the planet has at some point acted using the intuitive survival mechanism. Because of this, a willful great evil can exist and become a standard in any society due to self preservation (or preservation of family at the cost of one's own life). In other words "I'm not going to let my family die (or myself) because of some belief this dictator or that has...someone will take care of him and I'll be quiet while it is going on to see myself and my family survive." This is a natural instinct and until every human on the face of the planet overcomes it, they will still be sheep led to the slaughter.

      I'm not saying I believe in violence as an answer...I'm not saying Buddha or Gandhi were incorrect...I'm saying that the majority of humanity still acts based upon instinct and instinct tells us to survive. Until a majority is able to act against instinct and force the rest of humanity to comply based upon a peaceful means...all it takes is one charismatic individual acting out of instinct, chemical imbalance, conditioned rage, or whatever to cause an entire society to collapse.

      More to the point of this article, instead of quoting Buddha or Gandhi as a sort of "spiritual one-upmanship", I'll point out that the original poster never said one thing about having irritated the old codger in question at all and instead pointed to the unjust irritation that he experienced on a daily basis because of this person. In my opinion you should be speaking to the person causing the disturbance rather than the complainee, especially in the circumstance that he has done nothing wrong. If you're willing to spend your entire life tracking down people like this and explaining to them the teachings of Buddha and Gandhi, then I have the utmost respect and admiration for you. However, I suspect that in the situaiton that your child was threatened by someone with intent to take his/her life, you would react like every single member of humanity and provide self-sacrifice as an alternate means to your child's death. If this is the case, I commend you for being human. If you're the type to attempt to reason with psychopaths or just accept their actions and pity the person who perpetrated the act, I have nothing but disgust for you.

      It is PROVEN scientifially, theoretically, or any other way you slice it that not all of humanity is equal in thought processes and proper chemical balance. I don't care one bit about whether or not Gandhi or Buddha were ahead of their time in their thinking because I happen to agree. The only issue is that their philosophies are not applicable from a modern standpoint and therefore should be referenced with that in mind. The world is not a pretty place and by adhering strictly to these teachings you're saying 'I care more about my would-be assailants than I do about innocents.' Even the view that they need more 'help' than the rest, still kills good people every single day. In essence, you are wrong, but you are the type that will say 'everyone is entitled to their own opinion' to be as non-confrontational as possible (of course while maintaining the 'holier than thou' attitude). There are moral right and wrongs

    4. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Maybe it could work. But maybe not as well. It depends on the the circumstance. I think you may simply be assuming that this hasn't been tried.

      There definitely exist people out there that simply can't be talked out of anything or loved out of everything. For example, I can't think of any brutal dictator or authoritarian that has been convinced to step down just because his opponents loved him, though I'm not familiar with the UK/India situation, but even if that was affirmative, one affirmative example doesn't say much.

    5. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Gandhi and Buddha are dead and didn't accomplish much with their life other than providing an opposite end to the spectrum of 'violence solves all

      Hmm, somehow I think India got its independence mostly thanks to mr. Gandhi. I also seem to recall Buddha has quite a few followers..

      I guess it depends on your definition of accomplishment.

    6. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately his paranoia is likely the result of dementia/early alzheimer's, I volunteer at a local nursing home and it's pretty common and once they go off on a paranoic rant about people out to get them/taking their stuff/etc it's like talking to a brick wall. For example, the other day this one guy was wandering the halls opening any unlocked doors looking for his watch that he insisted someone stole from him. When it was later found in his room he insisted the theif had broken back in and put it back.

      Personally I wish we had something in between asking nicely and getting the police involved. With so many people living close to each other these days these petty disputes are hard to resolve, from barking dogs, loud music, dog crap, littering, etc. The police have better things to be doing than dealing with this nonsense, but a lot of the time it's the only realistic option we have.

    7. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I talked to the guy. His main beef is "fucking hippies!". Well, 'nuff said. I could understand and sympathize with that, having been a hippie until I made some money in the 90s.

    8. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by garyok · · Score: 1

      The more I read this the more it looks like a British story. Everybody seems to be treating this issue as a two-player game - the old guy and the geek - when it's likely to be the old guy vs a feral pack of hoody-wearing chavs, plus the geek. The geek's just collateral damage really - I doubt he's the main target inside, avoiding sunlight, sitting at his PC submitting to /. for his 15mins. Here's what I think the geeks should do:
      BUILD THE GRUMPY OLD FUCKER BETTER, MORE DISCRIMINATING NON-LETHAL WEAPONS
      Hoody chavs are vermin anyway and using them as test subjects for non-lethal weaponry is probably the only way they can serve their communities - probably the only useful thing they'll do their entire lives. Maybe they'll spawn a planet-saving super-genious, but the important point it is they're not that super-genious themselves.

      --
      One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    9. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by garyok · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else ever type in comments that they never mean to post? Just to preview them, then cancel them unsubmitted? Cos that's what happened here. Also, I really do know how to spell genius.

      --
      One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    10. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by AusIV · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Let's not forget

      "Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you." - Jesus.

      If I had a friend come to me asking advice on this subject, I'd loan them one of my copies of Dale Carnegie's How to Win Friends and Influence People. That book has helped me resolve quite a few conflicts, and is definitely worth a read.

    11. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Buy him a gift.

      And the perfect gift would be... a burning paper sack full of fresh dogshit. Leave it on his porch. All us old people LOVE that!

      "Whenever you are confronted with an opponent, conquer him with love." -Mahatma Gandhi
      Why allow anger to arise and thus Do exactly as he wants you to do? -The Buddha


      "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" - Jesus

      Oops, this is slashdot, no wonder you didn't add that last one!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    12. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      Hey, I've been trying to find that quote in the Bible! Which book/chapter/verse is it in? Thanks!

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    13. Re:Why don't you try... getting along? by dcam · · Score: 1

      Matthew 7:12

      In full context:
        9"Which of you, if his son asks for bread, will give him a stone? 10Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? 11If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him! 12So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.

      In other words, the call is for Christians to follow the example of God, who treats people well.

      --
      meh
  57. One solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Record fingernails on chalkboard and play it at 100DB or better. He should cry uncle before the police have time to respond.

  58. Mosquito netting by _Griphin_ · · Score: 1

    If you can prove his netting causes you people discomfort, sue the bastard!!!

  59. EMF RFI Audio Countermeasures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no legal countermeasure you can use to protect yourself, unless your a billionaire.

    Short of that.

    Break the fucking law.

  60. Have you tried... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... asking him to turn it off?

    1. Re:Have you tried... by kebes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that is a good idea... but if I were you, I would ask a friend (who the elderly gentelman in question has never met) to go and ask. He/she should simply pretend/imply that they live "nearby"... the fact that the man has never met this person will make him think twice. He's probably not evil at the core, and he's only trying to get back at certain people. If he suddenly realizes that he's annoying others, he will probably stop.

      This new friend could be someone a bit older than all of you, in which case he may sympathize with them more and stop this particular annoying behavior.

      Alternately, you might get a friendly and attractive female to go and do the asking. It's amazing how frequently that can resolve a situation with a grumpy old man. I've seen it work more than once.

    2. Re:Have you tried... by version2 · · Score: 1

      It's an amazing concept! Communication! =] Hell, i have heard monkeys do it.

    3. Re:Have you tried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Alternately, you might get a friendly and attractive female to go and do the asking. It's amazing how frequently that can resolve a situation with a grumpy old man. I've seen it work more than once.

      If the woman is naked, your chance of success increases by 100%

      Add a second, and have them touching each other while speaking too him. He will have a heart attack and all your troubles will be over

    4. Re:Have you tried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This being slashdot, I'm assuming the probability of a friendly and attractive female being available to help with this is rather remote.

    5. Re:Have you tried... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Of course I think it is funny that everyone assumes that this old guy is in the wrong.
      This noise device uses very high frequency sound. It will be my it's nature short ranged. How close do they have to be to his property for it to be a problem?
      It could very well be that the kids in the neighborhood are being jerks. A good example is near where I live. There are no street lights here. One night I was driving home and it was dark. I saw some movement in front of me so I turned on my hi-beams. It was a bunch of teenagers standing in the middle of the road. Now not only did they not get out of the road but on of them stood in the middle of the street and shot me the bird and screamed at me for turning on my high beams. Frankly I was just trying not to run anyone over.
      What would everyone's reply be if it was an older person on here complaining about some teen playing their stereo way too loud?
      I give this old guy credit. He found a high tech solution to his problem :)
      Hell for all you guys know he might have been a programmer for the Apollo project, built radar systems in WWII, or played blues in college in the 50s.
      He might be a lot cooler than you know.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Have you tried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never tried to communicate with somebody who is going OUT OF HIS WAY to be an ass hole to you.

      That's like saying "can't we just talk this out" before the school bully breaks your fucking nose for asking such a stupid question.

    7. Re:Have you tried... by plankers · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Most of the comments in this thread are written by people who don't understand that sometimes you really do have to fight fire with fire. Sometimes there is absolutely no way you can appease a person who thinks you are just out to annoy them. The best you can hope for is that they don't escalate the situation too far. You gear any actions you take towards minimizing their ability or desire to escalate it while reducing your own discomfort.

      In this case I don't really care who is specifically right or wrong, because it all went sideways. The guy asking the question has done something to annoy his elderly neighbor. Or maybe he didn't, and the old guy needs to realize the world doesn't revolve around him. We weren't there, we don't know. The elderly guy decided to get one of these Mosquito devices, and personally, that'd do it for me, too, because I can hear those things. Since I don't have an unlimited budget by which to fund my lawyer's legal assault on this dude (with no hope for any remuneration) I'd opt for a more direct approach, too. Like the person asking the question I too would try the police. If it isn't panning out I'm not going to waste time on trying to find a cop that can hear it. I'm not willing to live in misery during the interim.

      I'm also quite disappointed that people here can't put down their kind/gentle/be-nice crap, grow a set, and just think up some good ways to disable this thing. The ideas here have been so lackluster, complex, expensive, and dangerous. Just fill the damn thing with water via the speaker hole. Or stick a propane torch in it for 30 seconds. As long as you aren't an idiot about time of day or where you enter his yard from the problem is solved. At least with the water if it doesn't short circuit it'll take a while to dry out and will give you time to contemplate new attack vectors.

      With regard to the people commenting that he wouldn't be able to call the cops for the vandalism, all he has to do is say that it was a very expensive Mosquito repellent system. The cops aren't going to check, and if he phrases it that way he's not lying, either (ah, semantics). They will file the report, which then may influence property values, etc. So you have to do something to it that the cops won't file a vandalism/destruction of property report on, or be able to pin on a person. An act of God type of problem, like water. Dude, your mosquito thing got wet when it rained yesterday. It's not vandalism, it's nature.

      Heck, put some sugar in the water you spray in there and it'll be full of ants, too.

    8. Re:Have you tried... by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      This noise device uses very high frequency sound. It will be my it's nature short ranged. How close do they have to be to his property for it to be a problem?

      The product page touts itself as effective for "between fifteen and twenty meters" That's roughly 45-60 feet. If I had one of those on my porch it would definately affect both of my neighbors as well as anyone on the side walk in front of my house or in the steet.

    9. Re:Have you tried... by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Add a baby / toddler who can hear the noise and won't settle and you might be able to convince him.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    10. Re:Have you tried... by buysse · · Score: 1

      In the city where I live, the lots are 40' wide. Postage stamps. Assuming that the "65' effective radius" is correct, that means that it's probably designed to be intolerable inside that radius. That means it's still annoying outside. Now, from his back yard, he's made two yards on each side intolerable, probably at least one yard more likely three on the other side of the alley, and it's probably annoying for a good distance past that.

      --
      -30-
    11. Re:Have you tried... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Of course I think it is funny that everyone assumes that this old guy is in the wrong.

      Well, for one "am I wrong, or is it the old guy?" wasn't the question. The question itself presumes that the old man is wrong. Add to that the fact that every time I've had an "old man" complain about kids, he has been in the wrong. I could relay all sorts of stories, but I'll just leave it at that. We aren't trying the old man in court, we are just giving suggestions to someone that is having trouble with an old man.

    12. Re:Have you tried... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You see my experience is just the opposite.
      I have only had one bad experience with an old guy in my life. He thought that my music was too loud in my car. Much the same in this case as the people complaining about the anti-teen noise. My guess is that loud Heavy Metal was just as annoying to him. On the other hand I have seen bad manners from teen-age males a lot more than from elderly people. Even when I was a teen I really hated hearing just the boom boom of someone else's base in my car when I had the windows up, AC on, and my music playing.
      The best suggestion for would be to stop having trouble with this older gentleman. He has trumped you. Maybe showing a little respect and kindness would be the best solution. In other words maybe realizing that maybe he is in the right.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:Have you tried... by version2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am well versed in talking to people who go out of their way to be assholes. A broken nose is easy to fix and once that happens then I have 100% reason to open a nice can of whoop-ass. I stopped more bullies in school by trying to talk first or be funny than I can count...but once it is on...it is on. And you can, with a much clearer conscience, lay into someone. It's a good feeling to know you tried every avenue before resorting to, what should be, the last resort.

    14. Re:Have you tried... by fendbydog · · Score: 1

      Probably less likely that the old guy asking the "youngsters" to stop waking him at 3 AM with their blaster car systems. By most of the retaliatory responses, the old guy should have taken the "reasonable" course of "disabling" all of these systems in any way he could find.

    15. Re:Have you tried... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      He bought a thousand dollar machine designed specifically to annoy other human beings. No other purpose -- it's marketed as a device to piss off fellow humans and get them to leave the area. Then he turned it on in his neighborhood. At that point, it's probably a bit past just asking him to turn it off.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  61. Talk to the council by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

    You don't specify which country you actually live in, which makes it rather tricky to give advice. Given that the device is actually english, and sold in england, I'm assuming that's where you live.

    If that is the case, then there are laws against domestic noise nuisance, and it's not just decibels, it can be the type of noise and its duration. Your first step is to ask the guy politely to stop. Get the nicest and oldest local person that's sympathetic and can hear the noise (wouldn't hurt if they were female either) and basically talk to him politely. Invite him over for a cup of tea, and see if there's a way that you can find out what specifically is annoying him - it may be something very minor that wouldn't be a hassle to stop doing, or move a little way.

    Assuming that fails, then make a formal complaint to the local council. You'll need to make logs of the times that the noise is turned on, it's level of annoyance. Logs from multiple people would help, and it's especially useful if it's annoying when you're on your own property. Also, make a note of when you talked to him, and the outcome. The council will guide you through this. Assuming the council think you have a case, they'll start proceedings on your behalf. They'll pay for the court costs, arrange everything, you just have to turn up to give evidence.

    Your council probably has a website on the matter, look for 'domestic nuisance'. This is Sheffield's, as an example.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    1. Re:Talk to the council by man_ls · · Score: 1

      Set him up to be issued an ASBO :p

    2. Re:Talk to the council by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      If the submitter lived in England, he would have spelled it neighbourhood, no?

      Also interesting that the phrase "our harrassment" was not in quotes, which if I was on the jury I would interpret as admitting to harrassing the old man as part of their "day to day activities" which is also stated as happening before the man installed the device ("get back at us")...

      Trust me - you'll be an old man yourself a lot sooner than you think (if you live long enough).

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  62. DUMBASS RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It isn't a misquito repellant asshole!

  63. Who's paranoid ? by dbcad7 · · Score: 0

    On what basis can you call the neighbor using the mosquito device paranoid ? Just going by what has been said in the article the only one exhibiting "paranoid" behavoir is the author. I am not saying the neighbor isn't annoying, but it is the author who says the neighbor is out to get HIM. I think I need more evidence about the neighbor to conclude that this is intentional harrassment. For one I would like to know if there is indeed any mosquito problems in the area. I would also like to know what attempts besides calling the cops were made to resolve the situation. Sending cops to his house would really make freinds. ... sorry, but whole thing, just not enough info provided.

    --
    waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    1. Re:Who's paranoid ? by LanceUppercut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm just amazed how many posters decide to spew their ignorant nonsense without even trying to understand the issue first! Several posetrs here referred to some "mosquito problem". What mosquito problem??? Do you have any idea about the purpose of "mosquito noise device"? Did you care to follow the link and get a clue first before posting?

      For the lazy clueless types: the mosquito noise device has nothing to do with any actual mosquitos or "mosquito problems". The purpose of the device is to annoy young people in order to prevent them from congregating in certain areas. For example, some store owners don't like seeing teenagers gather in front of their stores (drives away customers). The mosquito noise device is specifically designed for the purpose of creating unbearable conditions for those teenagers in order to drive them away. The idea is that young people hear and get extermely annoyed by high frequency (mosquito) noise, while older people simply don't hear it.

      So stop embarassing yourself with references to "mosquito problem". If the old man is really using that specific device, then the only reason he is using it is to annoy and harass those young people. The device has no other use of purpose.

    2. Re:Who's paranoid ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read most of the replies on this thread. If you do the same, you will see that "Mosquito" is only the name of the product. It has as much to do with driving away actual mosquitos as Jaguar automobiles do with large predatory cats.

      The "Mosquito" noisemaker that this bitter old man installed is purpose-built to do only one thing: indiscriminately irritate young people. You don't have to know anything more than that to know that he's doing this with malice and deliberation.

      The original poster is most likely a victim of a borderline-senile probable-sociopath with delusions that any person under the aga of fourty-five who walks past his property is "up to no good."

      I say probable sociopath because he is deploying this aural assault indiscriminately throughout the whole neighborhood, disrupting not only the lives of the 20-somethings he no-doubt thinks of as "no-good kids" but almost certainly the innocent existences of ACTUAL children in the area, who cannot have done anothying to warrant such continued abuse.

      Whatever provoked the initial disagreement between the adults- whether eighteen or eighty- there can be neither excuse or defence for actions which harm uninvolved children. Since it's the old man who has crossed that line, he's automatically the one who's at fault.

    3. Re:Who's paranoid ? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      The ironic thing about this device is that if the victims were truly antisocial delinquents worthy of being "wiped...off the face of the earth", then they would just smash the device. Or, if it were out of reach, the store windows.


      Don't they have mall cops in the UK?

    4. Re:Who's paranoid ? by dbcad7 · · Score: 1
      Sorry about that.. but there ARE devices that uses sound to repel mosquitos. In fact if you were to google "mosquito" and "sound" I think you would have a hard time even finding this product, so the most common device would be exactly what I thought of.

      I guess my point about talking to the neighbor would be lost in a such place where a device as you describe is commonly used in public places. Obviously it is much more desirable to annoy the hell out of each other until the other goes away.. so now that you have done that to me, I will do the same... later.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    5. Re:Who's paranoid ? by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 1

      Searching for 'mosquito deterrent' on google gives compoundsecurity.co.uk as the 6th link. No more to say, really..

      --
      http://www.xkcd.com/354/
  64. Relatively simple by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    What will get this stopped is if the noise level is above the legal limit at the edge of his property.

    Get a DB meter (Radio Shack's is as good as any).
    Go to nearest point before entering his property.
    Record DB level. If it's above the legal limit for your community, call police with noise complaint.
    Show them DB meter reading. They will probably attempt to confirm you results. If they confirm the reading, they will make him shut it off.

    If the noise level it below the legal limit at the edge of the property you have no recourse, the law/statute is not being broken.
    You could try to sue him but that's a crap-shoot. Probably start with trying to get a temporary injunction.

        Trying to "fix" the problem yourself by breaking or stealing the device, counter-harrasment of some sort, is just as likely to get you in trouble. Noise cancellation - microphone, amplifier with a high-pass filter, and a cheap stero speaker (or just the tweeter) may work locally.

            Brett

  65. Sueing and Shooting: How about Talking? by mverwijs · · Score: 1

    I truly find it shocking that 90% of the top postings I see are about shooting or sueing this neighbour. Nobody with a brain online anymore? Nobody wondering about this situation?

    Nobody asking himself if this is truly meant as an attempt to annoy? Could it perhaps be possible that old man has a mosquito problem?

    Has the poster actually spoken to the man? How did this conflict start? What was the Posters part? What can /he/ do to resolve it? Do you truly believe that the elderly person wants to spend his last days in conflict with his neighborhood?

    Incredible, how many of you resolve to violence and lawyers. Both are so... expensive (in every way thinkable)!

    1. Re:Sueing and Shooting: How about Talking? by freehunter · · Score: 0

      I find it so amazing that most replies say that this gets rid of mosquitos. It does not. It emits a mosquito like noise, meant to annoy people. He IS trying to annoy his neighbors, there is no other purpose for the device.

    2. Re:Sueing and Shooting: How about Talking? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Well I find it shocking that a lot of the top postings are complete garbage. This has nothing to do with a mosquito problem. Mosquito is nothing but the brand name of the device. Read the link before actually posting un-informed opinions.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    3. Re:Sueing and Shooting: How about Talking? by Barny · · Score: 1

      And yet again how many people think this is a problem involving mosquito insects and NOT the device called a mosquito (ultra frequency noise crowd disperser).

      Violence + ignorance, the basis of the american culture.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    4. Re:Sueing and Shooting: How about Talking? by mverwijs · · Score: 1

      My bad for not clicking the link.

      Apart from that oversight, it is *still* ridiculous reach for guns and lawyers over this.

    5. Re:Sueing and Shooting: How about Talking? by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I'm calling bullshit on this one.

      "We were just minding our own business and this evil old man decided to harass us!"

      Sure sure. Young punks! Go clean your rooms!

  66. Fight money with money by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 1

    If there's no way to get him to shut up, there's always a chance that an Audio Spotlight will show up on eBay (about $2500!), in which case you could beam the sounds of hardcore bestiality at his door, so that every time he opens his door to get his newspaper, he's in for a surprise. ;-)

  67. Acoustic noise cancelling by lnxpilot · · Score: 1

    Build a noise canceller for the given frequency. :)

  68. A-weighting... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    A-law is an audio compression scheme.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:A-weighting... by DeeKayWon · · Score: 1

      No, it's a companding scheme used to improve the dynamic range of a digital signal in the frequency range used by the human voice. European communications systems use it extensively, whereas North America and Japan tend to use mu-law companding.

  69. Sell your house to the mob or drug dealers by poliopteragriseoapte · · Score: 1
    This is an easy one. Sell your house (at a good price) to the shadiest possible bidder. Bidders with ties to the mob or the drug world are especially suited. Take the money, and buy in a better place.

    Either the new owners will take care of the problem in their own way, or the old man will stop the annoying buzz, and maybe even decamp from the neighbourhood.

    Just be sure you mention the buzz problem to the buyers... _you_ don't want any problem from them!

    1. Re:Sell your house to the mob or drug dealers by sven_eee · · Score: 1

      don't you mean sell his house? just tell the new owner he is a dealer, with a few k's of cocaine inthe the house and watch them rip his house to shreds looking for it

  70. An economic war really... by EverLurking · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Looks like the speaker cone on the device is rather exposed.

    Betcha if you inject in some epoxy or expanding foam into said cone in quantities that won't be visible from the outside, the horn tweeter will stop making said annoying tone or at least attenuate the sound output or alter the frequency so that it won't be as bad.

    Do it right and it'll probably still look like it was still working this way too. Much faster than trying to disassemble something and disable it while making it look like it's still working. The old fart can't hear it anyways, so he'd never know that you'd broken the horn tweeter as many others have pointed out.

    You can also just go for a brute force/economic war approach:

    Your cost: A couple of bucks for a tube of quick setting epoxy with syringe type applicator. Or, if you don't want to do this manually or the unit isn't readily accessible try some home made/customized paint balls filled with acid/epoxy/superglue/something nasty His cost: $600-$750 + shipping per unit disabled.

    Just how many times do you think this guy will be able to afford to replace this device repeatedly? He's probably on fixed income so it's either the Mosquito or the Heart Medications/Doctor's Visits/Food/Heat/etc. The problem will soon go away given enough cheap paintballs I suspect.

    War after all is really a matter of economics. Does the damage you cause cost more to your opponent than it does to you and which of you can continue spending money while racking up damage/cost the longest? The guys with the biggest budget or the ability to do massive damage to the other side for cheaper usually wins.

    Dave

    --
    There are no stupid questions...just stupid people.
  71. Re:Day-to-day activities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My god, you are a dumbass. Read the article shithead. "Mosquito" is only the brand of the device.

    I'll say it again because I know you're too fucking lazy to read the previous sentence: "Mosquito" is only the BRAND of the device. Read the fucking article next time, asshole.

  72. I call BS by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    There's nothing magic about age 40.

    And 16KHz just isn't that high. You should be able to find many cops who can hear it. At least half of cops on patrol are under 40.

    Also, note to the designers of the Mosquito:

    Something isn't ultrasonic if humans can hear it. Early TV remotes were ultrasonic. They were 38KHz or 44KHz. That's well above the range of human hearing and humans couldn't hear them.

    To those who say this wouldn't show up on a sound meter, A-weighting is only down 10dB at 20KHz and 7 at 16KHz. 7 is a lot, but the difference between audible and annoyingly loud is far more than 10dB, so it would show up.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:I call BS by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Cops also have to pass rifle (Well, 9 millimeter pistol anyway) proficiency tests. A lot of cops will probably have their hearing somewhat damaged due to this and will probably be unable to hear the mosquito device.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    2. Re:I call BS by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Cops also have to pass rifle (Well, 9 millimeter pistol anyway) proficiency tests. A lot of cops will probably have their hearing somewhat damaged due to this and will probably be unable to hear the mosquito device.

      Using double ear protection (the kind of plugs you stick inside your ears, and wearing "cups" over them) makes an automatic rifle sound no louder than someone saying "pang". And you can still hear speech just fine.

      So if the cops have their ears damaged in the firing range, then they were either extremely unlucky or just plain stupid.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:I call BS by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Do they use the ear proectors?

      I keep seeing builders with operating very loud machinery with no ear protectors, and I'm fairly sure that it's a legal requirement in this country.

  73. Devices is designed to annoy HUMANS by gordon142 · · Score: 1

    A fair number of posters seems to be under the impression that this device has some "legitimate" use in repelling mosquitoes. Wrong. There is no evidence that mosquitoes are effected by sound at any frequency. The device in question is designed to annoy young people (check the website if you like), and nothing else.

  74. Skeeter Zapper by Borongo · · Score: 1

    Well IANL but I am a FY LS. I don't think this is really a matter for the police, from my probably naive student view this seems to be a textbook case of tort law (i.e. civil suits). Your neighbor may place anything on his property, but if it interfere with the enjoyment of your property then you could get the device removed/compensated. It might even work as a small claims court (where you won't need a lawyer). Of course you could also sue the manufacturer as well.

    1. Re:Skeeter Zapper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you could also sue the manufacturer as well.

      May you die: "Remember me... {gasp} ...as a drain on society... ...unnnhh."

    2. Re:Skeeter Zapper by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      '' Well IANL but I am a FY LS. I don't think this is really a matter for the police, from my probably naive student view this seems to be a textbook case of tort law (i.e. civil suits). Your neighbor may place anything on his property, but if it interfere with the enjoyment of your property then you could get the device removed/compensated. It might even work as a small claims court (where you won't need a lawyer). Of course you could also sue the manufacturer as well. ''

      If, one day, you become a lawyer, and someone comes to you with a complaint like this, I hope you will listen carefully to what they say, and when they are finished, you ask: "And now tell me what is _really_ going on". Do you think that as a lawyer you should start a court case without knowing any of the facts, just because of wild accusations by some punk kid?

      I bet if you asked the neighbor what is going on, and if you asked a few other adult people living there, you would get a completely different picture.

  75. Prove it... by volvoguy · · Score: 1

    Lots of good feedback already (no pun intended), but in addition to phase cancellation or documenting the noise with a db meter, you could also record it. Grab a copy of http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ to visually show what's going on, and if you're still not believed, pitch-shift it down an octave or two and play it back. I guarantee they can hear 4,250Hz (I still can and I turned it off 30 seconds ago. Doh!). If you simply can't get anyone to believe it's bothering you, plan-b is to disable it. Before you get a BB gun involved though, I'd try to just cut the power or turn it off. As has already been said, if he can't hear it on - he can't hear it off. I have a similar (but tougher I think) issue that I might need to officially ask Slashdot - about light pollution. My yard would be a near perfect place to see astronomical events if it weren't for my neighbor's bazillion-watt mercury vapor light. He's already said he won't turn it off, and he's literally the stereotypical "pissed-off old guy with a shotgun" that lives next door. If you tripped and fell into his yard from mine, he'd be in the backyard with a gun yelling at you (he always yells as he's deaf, but wants to make sure you hear him). I'll admit that I haven't looked into his or my legal rights regarding the subject, but this thing is bright enough that everyone in the fam' that has a bedroom on that side of the house has to close their (room-darkening) blinds at night to get any sleep. I know the bulbs for the thing cost a fortune, but I haven't been pissed off enough yet to shoot the thing out. Oh - he also burns his garbage. A wonderful aroma with the windows open on a warm summer's day. I won't go into that one.

  76. Yoshimasa DSSF3 Spectrum Analyzer by theproff · · Score: 1

    If you've got a laptop with a decent sound card (if you're posting on /. you ought to) and install the trial version of this on it. It's a kick-ass real time spectrum analyzer, oscilloscope, tone, and noise generator. Show the cops the spectrum analysis to prove the presence of the device. It's kinda like the dB meter idea, but more freeer [sic]. Plus, if the cops still don't believe you, just generate a little white noise or like a 4 kHz tone and blast it back at him ;) It's a 30 day free trial of the program that becomes an infinite day free trial with a little regedit majjic...

  77. Try not being a dick? by whistlingtony · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love the way everyone here says to go over and break his stuff.... Lovely...

    Ok, so he's probably an annoying old paranoid crank. He's not going to stop being annoying. If you go over and break his stuff, he'll just become more annoying.

    So don't go starting a neighborhood war.

    You might try... oh... I don't know... TALKING to him about it? You know, person to person? And leave your attitude at the door.

    If that fails, and it may well do so, go talk to your neighbors. Get about 20 of you. go knock on his door together and POLITELY state that his little toy is driving the entire neighborhood nuts and you'd all really appreciate him turning it off. Bring food. Make it an event. Hell, throw a neighborhood barbecue while you're at it.

    Don't consider the situation an obstruction to be overcome. Instead, consider it a chance to meet your neighbors. Who knows, you might find out they are actual people, with lives and interests and stuff. Who knew?

    And shame on those of you who immediately decided the best course of action was to go on a shadowrun against an old man. Sheesh.. People...

    -T

    1. Re:Try not being a dick? by gregorio · · Score: 1
      You might try... oh... I don't know... TALKING to him about it? You know, person to person? And leave your attitude at the door.

      If that fails, and it may well do so, go talk to your neighbors. Get about 20 of you. go knock on his door together and POLITELY state that his little toy is driving the entire neighborhood nuts and you'd all really appreciate him turning it off. Bring food. Make it an event. Hell, throw a neighborhood barbecue while you're at it.
      Would you do that to someone who is going to steal your house? Seriously. Think about it.

      And, BTW: talking to him would only expose you to the statistical danger of wanting to kick his ass and break his elderly bones. You'll never know how these paranoid SOBs will react to your presence.

      I used to live close to an elderly paranoid SOB who thought that every single young person in the planet was going to damage his car painting. He bought a 5mW laser pointer and seriously damaged the eyes of two twelve year old brothers (with rich parents who could pay for any painting damage that could be done) because he used to stay all day at the window, targeting younger people's eyes. The worst thing about the whole situation was the fact that these children were fixing their bicycles, in front of their own house, sitting inside their own property.

      Other disturbing fact about what happened is that his son once acknowledged that the old man's car was never damaged by anyone. It was just plain paranoia about "possibilities". Later on we found out that while he was young, the now elderly SOB used to damage other people's cars and that was the reason for his paranoia.

      The story ended with the kid's father beating the crap out of the old man after being attacked with the laser, while he was standing at his front door, asking about what happened.
    2. Re:Try not being a dick? by cheezit · · Score: 1

      Ended with...what? No more laser pointer? Ambulance? No more old man?

      I'm always amazed when seemingly irrational people can "get" that they need to stop their behavior---which implies a pretty good understanding of cause and effect.

      --
      Premature optimization is the root of all evil
    3. Re:Try not being a dick? by gregorio · · Score: 1
      Ended with...what? No more laser pointer? Ambulance? No more old man?
      Oh, sorry. I forgot the most important part. =]

      Ended with a really bitter yet afraid old man who spent the rest of his life away from the window. No one needed to get his laser pointer because he knew that the next time he did that, he would be propably beaten up again.

      For the next years, every single kid that felt something strange (not necessarily related to their eyes) or even just saw him at the window complained about it to their parents, who would show up at his front door with a really bad attitude and a very explicit physical intervention threat.

      A guy down the street, with 3 child daughters at home, talked about turning him blind with his own laser (can't see, can't aim), but most people weren't exactly fans of this kind of solution.

      He died three years ago, from natural causes (I guess, nobody ever cared to ask about him), and now his son lives there. It's a nice guy, but everyone hates him and threats him like crap, because of what his father did in the past.

      The funniest thing about this history is that his "reasons" were revealed (by himself) after the eye accident hapenned, and he ended up with a severely damaged car painting. Even 50-year old soccer moms would stop at his house to destroy his car. It turned up to be a bery constant and funny neighborhood activity.
  78. Fight the war on terror by Arykor · · Score: 1

    You can contact the DHS about public health concerns (or the cdc)... Tell them that your neighbor has been acting very strange lately, and that he installed a dangerous looking electronic device on his house. Also, that now you and your other neighbors are experiencing headaches and nausea, but only while in the vicinity of the device.

  79. Grow up! by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Grow up!

  80. The old flaming bag on the porch? by 2e · · Score: 0

    The old flaming bag on the porch?
    I'm suprised no one has suggested it yet.
    "A flaming bag, eh? Well, these new Italian loafers will make short work of it."

    And so forth...

    I like the idea of disabling it, but leaving the LEDs functioning, so that the neighbor still thinks it's working...

    -Steven

  81. Epilepsy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a friend who has been diagnosed with epilepsy who *JUST* so happens to have a siezure triggered by the device, the operator of said device would be in quite a deep pile of shit and financial liablity. Especially if you have a lawyer friend draft up a notice to your neighbor informing him that his activities may well have life threatening impacts on you and your guests at your home. After serving notice to your neighbor, it would behoove you to also place a small ad in the announcements section of your newspaper, so that it is a matter of public record that your neighbor has been notified of this. Then, just SUE HIS ASS OFF. I'm certain that if your epileptic friend had actual harm done (or heaven forbid, died because of a siezure induced by the device) you could possibly even convince the DA to press criminal charges. I'd love to see the old fucker tried for manslaughter.

    Just my $.02

    1. Re:Epilepsy by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

      That's it, kill your friend off to get back at your neighbor. You sound like a real stand-up guy.

      Remind me to never shake your hand.

  82. Oh for shit's sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just kill the cocksucker, you pussy.

  83. A classic choice by ydra2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You could escalate the conflict by using high tech countermeasures which will piss him off and turn his relatives and friends against you, or make peace and have a nice quiet neighborhood. Hmmm, which way to go, never ending warfare on the one hand, or peace and quiet on the other?

    If you go with high tech warefare then you will stimulate the economy by propping up the companies selling sonic noise cancelling systems. And he will of course provide even more stimulation to the economy when he installs an infra-red insect repellent that fries your border plants. And then you have to invest in a cryogenic thermal redirection unit to protect your flowers, after which he will escalate with a plastic dissolving mist spray device, all great news for the high tech neighborhood armament corporations, aka, the militarized neighborhood complex.

    This will be fraught with unforseen complications and collateral damage. Your paper boy will refuse delivery, the water meter reader will not dare enter the property, causing an unpaid bill, and various charges about maliciously killing pets will pop up. You can stay the course until he gives up, but just make sure you understand that you may be liable for accidents caused by radio frequency interference with passing vehicle's electronics.

    Or you could just walk up to the guy and say "Hi neighbor, is there a problem, and if so, lets work it out."

    Naahh, not a chance. Get out the mini trebouchet and carpet bomb the hell out of him with marbles, eggs, and anything else you have handy! Screw the bastard more than he ever thought of screwing you! Worry about the consequences later, after all you don't have to pay for it, or at least not most of it.

    1. Re:A classic choice by jazir1979 · · Score: 1

      a mod point, a mod point, my kingdom for a mod point..

      --
      What's your GCNSEQNO?
    2. Re:A classic choice by Bronster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or you could just walk up to the guy and say "Hi neighbor, is there a problem, and if so, lets work it out."

      I'm replying to you out of many who said this, but...

      The problem with this theory is that said neighbour has already invested approx £700 in a device with which to fight this war. A device which, if the war is terminated early will be useless.

      Sounds to me like this investment will make resolution harder. The best time to fix this would have been before lots of money was invested in war-making machines.

      See also: international relations.

    3. Re:A classic choice by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      '' The problem with this theory is that said neighbour has already invested approx £700 in a device with which to fight this war. A device which, if the war is terminated early will be useless. ''

      Seems there is a guy who has been annoyed by the neighborhood kids so much that he was forced to spend £700 to get a bit of piece. One of the offending neighbourhood kids describes him as "paranoid". Since that kid is in no way qualified to make that assessment, and since that kid is talking about "neighbourhood war" already, he is also unlikely to be objective. Since this apparently happens in England, I can assure you that the number of absolutely unbearable kids in England exceeds the number of paranoid elderly people by a huge factor.

      And interestingly, how come you are talking about "war" as well? There is no war. Measures were taken by one side to keep the sides apart, which is apparently what the original poster doesn't like. This is a purely defensive move, so we can have some idea who the aggressor is.

    4. Re:A classic choice by qsqueeq · · Score: 1

      He's elderly, just kick his ass. It's cheap.

    5. Re:A classic choice by Bronster · · Score: 1

      I'm inclined to agree with you that the original poster is a Chav (or see other threads, a novel form of slashvertisement)

      If the device can be heard within the homes of the "kids" above, then it's not defensive, it's attacking. Quite nastily in fact.

    6. Re:A classic choice by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like this investment will make resolution harder. The best time to fix this would have been before lots of money was invested in war-making machines.

      And, what, that's a good reason to not even try being a social adult and fixing it appropriately?

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  84. Behave like a man by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Try to behave like a man. Knock on his door, and ask him _politely_ why he thinks he needs to keep you and your friends away from your home. And I mean, politely. And alone, not with a gang of youths in the background. And listen to what he says. If he doesn't want to talk to you, try again. This may be the hardest thing you have ever done in your life, showing some respect for the people around you, thinking about the consequences of your actions and behaving like a responsible adult. Maybe think about things that you do that you think are funny when you are drunk, and think what other people would feel about them.

    Now if you are completely without fault, and the reason for your problem _is_ indeed just paranoia, then the easiest and best solution is to just stay away. It doesn't cost you much, he feels better, and you feel better because you have done The Right Thing.

    Some idiots here suggest you should escalate the problem. The problem with that is you don't know where it will end. If you escalate enough, it can end with destroyed lives, his or yours. Think about that.

    1. Re:Behave like a man by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the sound emitted by that device can easily reach into other's yards. Just imagine how horrible it must be living down the street from a guy pumping a really annoying sound out of a loudspeaker 24/7.

      Think of someone blasting something like Cher outside your house 24/7 - you'd go insane after a very short while.

    2. Re:Behave like a man by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      I'm guessing that the noise from the device extends past the edge of the man's property. That is, onto their properties. And they hear it all the time.

      This is equivalent to someone blasting "music" loud enough to make the walls vibrate next door.

    3. Re:Behave like a man by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      24/7? Pah. With Cher, I think it would take 12 or so seconds before I went postal and murdered everyone.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:Behave like a man by Woy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The younguest and most creative within legal limits wins the escalation. Go for it, and be merciless - your neighboor is old enough to know better.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    5. Re:Behave like a man by Absentminded-Artist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So many people have suggested this, but you are assuming the neighbor is capable of being reasonable. Some people are just jerks. Honest.

      The best suggestions here involve getting younger policemen to come out to witness the aural attack. Don't call dispatch. The submitter needs to drive over to the precinct and talk to the person in charge - whomever is on duty. Explain the technology to them, show them news printouts from NPR, CNN, BBC, etc. Bring a sample sound clip of the "mosquito" on his laptop or iPod. He'll have to convince them in person or they'll just dismiss him as a punk kid/crackpot.

      If I didn't have a house filled with kids and teenagers I might like to use this "warfare" myself on an annoying neighbor myself. My next door neighbor can't seem to experience any music without a sub woofer. In fact, I swear he has a stereo with sub woofer in every room of his house. Of course, he mounts his stereos on the inside walls. Every few months I have to go over there and remind him to keep it down after 10pm. Then I have to knock on his door at 1am, 2am, 3am... He doesn't get it until I've made such a pain of myself I win for a few months. If I asked this guy earnestly why he feels the need to be so loud so late at night he'd tell me to do anatomically awkward things to myself. No. I'm better off just kindly but sternly asking him to lower the music again. He glares at me but he turns the music down.

      Now he's parking his car across two spaces so nobody else can use Guest parking. I don't think he's clueless. I think he just enjoys pissing his neighbors off. It's a power trip. Talking nicely to him only makes him crankier.

      --
      The Splintered Mind - Overcoming
    6. Re:Behave like a man by No.+24601 · · Score: 1

      Some idiots here suggest you should escalate the problem. The problem with that is you don't know where it will end. If you escalate enough, it can end with destroyed lives, his or yours. Think about that.

      Very insightful suggestion... to be honest, the escalation responses are damned hilarious "on paper", but none of them would be good suggestions without knowing more about the situation. The main question is:

      How disruptive is the noise to your everyday life?

      Whether any escalation is required depends only on the answer to that question. Most people wouldn't be able to answer that question properly because they would allow thoughts of revenge to cloud their thinking. The best thing to do if the problem is really disrupting your life is to convince your neighbour that it is. If this does not help, then you should try to convince authorities that it is disrupting your life. If both these attempts fail, then you should exercise caution when deciding on appropriate responses to his "mosquito device".

    7. Re:Behave like a man by Cheviot · · Score: 1
      This may be the hardest thing you have ever done in your life, showing some respect for the people around you, thinking about the consequences of your actions and behaving like a responsible adult.


      People who do not show respect to you do not deserve your respect.

      Some idiots here suggest you should escalate the problem. The problem with that is you don't know where it will end. If you escalate enough, it can end with destroyed lives, his or yours. Think about that.


      In a choice between escalation and appeasement I'd go with escalation every time. There is no reason to allow the disrespectful behavior of this old guy with a grudge to be rewarded in any way.
    8. Re:Behave like a man by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1
      your neighboor is old enough to know better.
      And you're still to young to care?

      (Surely somebody's got to recognize this reference, besides me....even though it's not your typical geek fare....)
      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    9. Re:Behave like a man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Try to behave like a man. Knock on his door, and ask him _politely_ why he thinks he needs to keep you and your friends away from your home. And I mean, politely. And alone, not with a gang of youths in the background. And listen to what he says. If he doesn't want to talk to you, try again. This may be the hardest thing you have ever done in your life, showing some respect for the people around you, thinking about the consequences of your actions and behaving like a responsible adult. Maybe think about things that you do that you think are funny when you are drunk, and think what other people would feel about them.


      Wrong answer. You go next door, explain the situation to him and ask him to take it down. If he refuses you tell him to take it down. If he doesn't, sue.

      Offer him no safe harbor. You'd be surprised what you can do legally with the proper research. Let him know what anything he does to you will result in an exponential response. Is he degrading your property value in any way? Does he have an unsightly storage shed that violates code? Is he making any money on the side that the IRS needs to know about? Do you suspect he's selling his prescriptions? Is he a threat to other drivers on the road? Does he have a right to mount that satellite dish where it's mounted? Search all online legal databases available to your locality and look for chinks in the armor. Is there something he's prone to doing that you should be aware of?

      Full court press, baby!

      If he has relatives or friends you suspect might be capable of violence be sure that you have a loaded weapon in the house within easy reach and that you are capable of handling it under an epinephrine dump. I'm not kidding, especially if he has kids size them up in advance and dig for every shred of data you can find on them. Kids tend to get testy when you screw with their parents even if their parents are in the wrong and you are taking legal action. You do not want to be undefended if the elder son's cheese slides off his cracker. Another possible scenario is the old guy gets so incensed that he lets fly with a round out the window you can call 911 screaming shots fired and get things resolved summarily. Where I live that's about the only thing cops are good at.

      Every once in a great while you'll find kids who are savvy and know that the parent is a crank. They may be able to help if you haven't burnt the bridge (or blown it up for that matter).

      Once upon a time after getting out of the army I was a nice young man, and then I lived in nasty parts of three major cities. It gets you nowhere in most situations these days. The cops do not care. We had a nice old guy who was in his 70's and he asked three 20-somethings to quit dealing in front of his house. Nicely. They killed his dog and threatened him. The cops will do nothing. He calls daily; they get annoyed with him. They've even insinuated that they might arrest him. Do you think pricks like this will act over a "noise device" some old guy has outside of his house?

      Now if you are completely without fault, and the reason for your problem _is_ indeed just paranoia, then the easiest and best solution is to just stay away. It doesn't cost you much, he feels better, and you feel better because you have done The Right Thing.


      Feel better? You're an ass. This old fart is wasting the kid's time. Who cares how people "feel". Outside of my peer group I don't care who likes me or hates me. That's for insecure twits like you who need affirmation. If you get in my way or waste my time I will do my best to hand you your goddamned head. Fuck nice. Nice was for the 1950's.

      Some idiots here suggest you should escalate the problem. The problem with that is you don't know where it will end. If you escalate enough, it can end with destroyed lives, his or yours. Think about that.


      Try coming to my neighborhood with that attitude, oh peacemaker. You'll be sobbing in your rootbeer by the end of the day. You probably live in a gated community. *snicker*

      "The meek shall inherit nothing" - Frank Zappa
    10. Re:Behave like a man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now he's parking his car across two spaces so nobody else can use Guest parking.

      Odd thing that all 4 tire valves leak only when he parks across 2 spaces.

    11. Re:Behave like a man by yndrd1984 · · Score: 0
      ask him _politely_ why ... And listen to what he says.
      Moderation: +1 Good Advice - It's always best to try amicable solutions first.

      This may be the hardest thing you have ever done in your life, showing some respect for the people around you, thinking about the consequences of your actions and behaving like a responsible adult. Maybe think about things that you do that you think are funny when you are drunk, and think what other people would feel about them.
      Moderation: -1 Hypocrisy - Telling someone to be polite and respectful while insulting them.

      the easiest and best solution is to just stay away.
      Moderation: -1 Spineless - The old guys behavior is almost certainly illegal and it's interfering with people's right to enjoy their lives. I wouldn't suggest the criminal options, but legal escalation it just as much a part of "being a man" as ovatures of diplomacy.
    12. Re:Behave like a man by gregorio · · Score: 1
      Try to behave like a man. Knock on his door, and ask him _politely_ why he thinks he needs to keep you and your friends away from your home.
      That's not being a man. It really doesn't matter at all why he wants to keep anyone away from public places. If the device range is invading public space, he is wrong, period.

      Real men don't ask about people's reasons for doing illegal actions. First, you should defend yourself. If someone is beating the crap out of your face, you will fight back (breaking his little toy). It's not possible to sue while being beaten. If you can (if it's better to) run away, you call the cops. If the cops don't solve the issue immediately, they sue. If the legal system doesn't works, you take preventive actions to avoid being attacked again.

      Being real men is mostly about defending yourself and taking responsability for your own actions. Asking "why are you beating me?" is not acting like a man, it's more like acting like a pussy. NO ONE, I repeat, NO ONE, should be obliged to act like babysitters for people envolved in wrongdoings. You're not his relative, he doesn't give a crap about you. There is no need to be polite with proposital agressors.
    13. Re:Behave like a man by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Now he's parking his car across two spaces so nobody else can use Guest parking.

      Duh, have his car towed. He'll be nice if being a prick costs $200. Also, why bother banging on his door? Call the cops at 1am. Then do it the next night when they do it again. Eventually, the cops will get tired of his stupid ass and tell him to keep it down or spend the night in jail.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    14. Re:Behave like a man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This reminds me of the guy that used to live next door to me. He had a big black lab, and he let the damn dog run all over the place. Cutting the grass was an excercise in looking for dog poop and trying to not step in it. He also liked to start cutting his grass at 7:45AM on Saturday, knowing that he wasn't allowed to until 8AM, but would just say "dude, it's just 15 minutes, get over it" and keep doing it.

      Since the guy got himself elected HA president (he's was a professor at the local university, and had a forceful personality), it was hard to get anyone to do anything about it, even with videotape evidence.

      He ended up the least liked guy in the development of over 300 homes. Everyone knew him, and generally hated him.

      So, we took the easy route. Nobody else in a several house radius owned a dog. We bought a few dog whistles. And they got placed into trees, or on rooftops. On the homes all around his house.

      No matter which way the wind blew, one of the whistles would start to sound. And his dog would start to bark. Loudly. At all hours of the night. Since he had a toddler himself, their baby would get woken up constantly, and the parents couldn't sleep well, either. And we kindly kept calling the police about his dog.

      Since his dog acted totally normal away from the house, the guy started to suspect something, but he couldn't prove a thing. Eventually, we started to see the dog on a leash outside the house all the time, the lawnmower stopped starting at 7:45, and about a month later, put the house up for sale. Claimed the dog just didnt'like the house.

      Cheapest fix ever.

    15. Re:Behave like a man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of people are suggesting this however I know the type of person he is dealing with. I have lived across the street from an old man for 29 years (he wasn't old when we moved in.) We have lived in kindness and respect for 29 years without a single incident. All of a sudden, this guy comes over to our house and begins yelling and cursing about something we did not do in front of our children. The man would not listen to reason, even when we offered to correct the problem we did not cause. 29 years of kindness did not defuse a short temper and a quick judgement. Continued kindness did not defuse a situation. Some people can't be reasoned with as adults.

    16. Re:Behave like a man by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      "If you escalate enough, it can end with destroyed lives, his or yours."

      Well yes, if one of you is an arsonist or something.

      If you stay within the legal limits and don't go too far there's nothing wrong with "getting back".

    17. Re:Behave like a man by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      '' In a choice between escalation and appeasement I'd go with escalation every time. There is no reason to allow the disrespectful behavior of this old guy with a grudge to be rewarded in any way. ''

      That is a very brave and very stupid attitude.

      It can be funny for outsiders, as shown in the film "War of the Roses".

  85. This is not a solution but should make him stop. by jozmala · · Score: 1

    Connect desibel meter measuring the frequency, have computer computing the strength of the noise at source.
    The play a message at same desibel rating saying. "This device measures the strenth of continuous high frequency noise emitted by "neighbours name" that babies and kids can hear, it can cause hearing damage in babies". Following is the noise is the original noise at similar strenght converted to frequency that adults can hear too.[The original noise converted to frequency that annoys adults.] Please make him stop. This message will automaticly shutdown when his device shuts down. Please help. We are desperate, and cannot concentrate on our schoolwork because of his noise. "neighbours name hates kids and wants to damage their hearing, and prevent them from doing their schoolwork." ...

    --
    ©God :Copyright is exclusive right for creator to determine the use of his creation.
  86. They would but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they don't know his email address.

    1. Re:They would but... by 2muchcoffeeman · · Score: 1

      The real problem is that they tried to get his attention via IM. Damn Luddites! How can you get somebody's attention when he insists in staying in the Neanderthal era of the telephone and snail mail?!?

      --
      Prevent Windows piracy. Use Linux instead.
    2. Re:They would but... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      And even if they did, he wouldn't understand wh47 7h3y w3r3 45k1n6 0f h1m

    3. Re:They would but... by kryogen1x · · Score: 1

      Does this old man happen to live in Korea?

    4. Re:They would but... by IrishMASMS · · Score: 1

      What, they could not find the guy's myspace page?

  87. Always look at the bright side of life.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more annoying moschitos in the neighborhood. :-)

  88. Anti social behaviour by PHASER8 · · Score: 1
    Oddly enough I found the following on the products website:
    Anti social behaviour has become the biggest threat to private property over the last decade and there has been no effective deterrent until now.
    I'd really like to know EXACTLY how being anti social threatens private property. I remember awhile back that article on the kids that got busted for playing in a tree with the police officer saying the following:
    Superintendent Stuart Johnson, operations manager at Halesowen police station, said: 'I support the actions of my officers who responded to complaints from the public about "kids destroying" an ornamental cherry tree by stripping every branch from it, in an area where there have been reports of anti-social behaviour. West Midlands Police deals robustly with anti-social behaviour
    It seems to me that 'anti social behaviour' is some kind of problem over in the UK area.
  89. cut his power by sven_eee · · Score: 1

    just jump the fence and switch off his power at the meter.
    next time jump the fence and kill the power again padlocking his meter box
    then if he installes his own padlock just keep tripping his fuses

  90. A real solution by jimmoores · · Score: 1

    The problem with most of the solutions given here is that they are illegal. What you really need is a way to demonstrate to your local council's (I'm assuming that you're in the UK) Environmental Health department. See http://www.bbc.co.uk/crime/support/noisyneighbours .shtml for more details. The key thing though, is to get a device to frequency-shift the sound - the sort of thing used to listen to ultrasonic bat calls or to change the pitch of someone's voice on the phone. This way you can show those older investigators how annoying the sound is - or you could always ask for them to send their youngest officers...

  91. Send him a product recall notice by sven_eee · · Score: 1

    Send him a formal letter that looks like it came from someone big that tells him that there is a product recall on the product due to a link to cancer/death, then tell him to post it some where and a refund would be sent back to him, Then state if he continues using the device he would be loose all legal rights against the manufacturer.

    If you word it right and use a good color laser printer it works every time, You can even send it back to him with the speaker removed :)

  92. Get a dog. by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    Get a dog, then accuse the neighbor of animal cruelty.

    PETA may throw red paint on them.

  93. It's easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rig a microwave to work with the door off. Point towards unwanted electrical things. Turn on for ~30 seconds.
    It should blow most things in front of it, so be very careful!! Also, don't point it at humans!!

  94. Did anyone read the site? by justinlee37 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The site linked to had the following to say about it's product:

    "The Mosquito ultrasonic teenage deterrent is the solution to the eternal problem of unwanted gatherings of youths and teenagers in shopping malls and around shops. The presence of these teenagers discourages genuine shoppers and customers' from coming into your shop, affecting your turnover and profits. Anti social behaviour has become the biggest threat to private property over the last decade and there has been no effective deterrent until now.

    Acclaimed by the Police forces of many areas of the United Kingdom, the Mosquito ultrasonic teenage deterrent has been described as "the most effective tool in our fight against anti social behaviour". Shop keepers around the world have purchased the device to move along unwanted gatherings of teenagers and anti social youths. Railway companies have placed the device to discourage youths from spraying graffiti on their trains and the walls of stations. "

    The site linked to doesn't say that the device is used to repel mosquitos; it says that it's used for annoying or rebellious teenagers. The old man is just using the product for the purpose that the company intended!

    1. Re:Did anyone read the site? by kylegordon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Uurrm, thanks for telling us everything we already knew about the article... Unless you're reading a parallel universe article where the old man claims he is using it to repel Mosquitos instead of people...

  95. Measure it by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    Get a microphone with decent high fequency response. Plug into computer. Using an RTA (Real Time Analyzer) show the police the giant solitary spike around 18K, or whatever it's at.

    The reason the police can't hear it is cause they're in cars with sirens all day long - the sirens damage their hearing. Get a police detective to come out - they should be able to hear it since they sit in an office and aren't around sirens all the time.

    -Eric Kincl

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  96. Sabotage the device by mrjb · · Score: 1

    If you currently cover your ears around the device, keep doing that. He'll never know the difference.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  97. Homemade EMP weapon by nobodaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By way of discussion of a general way to disable electronics; not advocating criminal damage or violation of local spectrum use codes;

    Get a shotgun and cartridges (wider the bore*, the better).

    1) Saw the barrel right down to within 2 inches or so of the top of the cartridge (may be illegal in your jurisdiction: check!).

    EXTREME CAUTION - handling unstable explosives
      - the catridge has, on the inner side of the metal cap, a small amount some unstable explosives (google picarates)
    that are designed to go off when the cap is struck. This charge is enough to blow off a finger or maybe a hand.
    It's purpose is to set off the [stable] main powder charge. The powder charge could take your head or leg off.
    No naked flame, sparks, live wires, hard surfaces, loose tools, children, pets, etc etc etc.

    2) pry open the cartridge and ditch the shot (keep the powder charge + wadding).
    3) form an empty tube of cardboard, roughly pencil thin, and wrap enough very-thin (e.g. from a small transformer) copper wire
    around it so it's wrapped diameter fits snugly back into the part-empty cartridge
    NOTE
    you need to wrap so that the full thickness is reached before moving onto the next layer - i.e. not all-the-way-up-the-tube
    -then-back-to-the-start--for-each-layer
    4) get a bar magnet fitting just a bit loosely into your tube
    5) place the coil + magnet into the cartridge. the coil should rest about an inch from the top of the wadding.
    Glue the coil in place.
    6) Inert the bar magnet into the tube and glue the end to the top of the wadding
    7) [needs experimentation or a physics person] maybe fix a load resistor (e.g. pencil lead) across the two free ends of the coil wire

    Now, when the cartridge is fired in the shotgun,
    1) the magnet accelerates through the center of the coil
    2) the coil builds a magnetic field
    3) as the shockwave of the powder charge successively destroys the coil from one end to the other,
    the magnetic field is sucessively compressed into one end of the coil
    4) as the final section of the coil is destroyed, an electromagnetic pulse is emitted
    5) as no metal barrel is there to interfere, the pulse travels in the general direction of the aim of the gun.

    So, when aimed in the general direction of a mosquito alarm, within say a hundred feet (?), it ought to fry it's circuits.
    Perhaps circuits of a bunch of other stuff in the general direction.
    Range is unknown; will be fairly loud (wear ear protectors).

    I haven't tried this myself... Caveat experimentor ..

    * bore (not boar[=pig]) is measure of inner width of barrel. works like this: "12-bore" = width of sphere of 1/12th a pound of lead ; "18-bore" = width of sphere of 1/18th a pound of lead - so smaller bore is bigger. mmkay? 'Guage' probably same thing in USA .. somebody check, quick ..

    1. Re:Homemade EMP weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Except that you will have a bar magnet being fired off like a bullet. Disregarding the fact that this is dangerous, it should be noted that most bar magnets will lose their field if struck hard enough.



      A better approach is dismantling a microwave, and using the magnetron. Transistorized circuits can be completely destroyed by microwaves (if you feel like watching the fireworks, put your cell phone in a microwave and then try using it when it cools down). So you take this magnetron, use the casing of the microwave to "aim" it (or else it will wrap around and hurt you), and turn his house into a lighting chamber.



      Speaking of breaking the law, this is possible one of the most illegal things you can do. Aside from frequency laws, you are probably going to start a fire somewhere, any poor fool who gets in the crossfire will feel like the water in their body is boiling (which can lead to death if their stay in the path of the microwaves long enough), and you might even interfere with RADAR. Perhaps a smarter way to combat the mosquito is to find his break box and just remove the master breaker.

  98. You're a nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Produce an inverse sound wave to cancel it out.

  99. Sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get one of those 9volt battery-powered chirp things that emit a chirp every 3 minutes.
    Chuck a couple in his house somehow.
    he will go insane.

  100. Wow! an intelligent comment at last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Analysis: before implementing a solution, is to make sure you've got the full picture. Note that your neighbor is in fact being harassed by something, if not intentionally. What is that thing? If it's something you are doing... Trade Study: will it be a major or minor imposition to not do it; can you bring yourself to politely inform your neighbor that you'll not do it in exchange for taking the offending device offline?

    Wow, an intelligent response at last.

    If Slashdot moderation were any good, this response would get modded up to the max and every other response to this article modded down to -1.

  101. Another method by Poingggg · · Score: 1

    You can use nailgloss (?)(the stuff women use to paint their nails with) too. Get a cheap vial in the most disgusting color you can find (prevents the s.o. from using it) and bring it on thick on the offensive coil.

    We used this in a tv-shop I have worked in, and it works like a charm (+ it's cheap!)

    --
    What person will donate an airborne act of love?
    1. Re:Another method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works well for color-coding components too! Get an assortment of bright colors, plus clear. Brush-on clear paint is handy for keeping down the corners of stickers, protecting finishes that might otherwise rub off, and leveling out slight imperfections in surfaces.

  102. Since he can't hear the thing... by smackdotcom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...just conspire with the neighbours one day, and thank him for turning it off. Have the neighbours do the same. He may protest that it's still on, but you simply assure him that you certainly can't hear anything anymore (for drama, cock your head and pause a second when you do this). Now obviously he'll take the thing down and maybe try to fix it and remount it, but continue to ignore it and be pleasant to him. Hopefully he'll get the idea that even if the thing isn't working anymore, it obviously was not worthwhile in the first place, and either pack it away or ship it back for a refund.

    --

    In a world without walls, there is no need for Windows.

    1. Re:Since he can't hear the thing... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      This is EXACTLY how to deal with this problem. Everybody pretend it isn't working, and he'll return it to the manufacturer, which will tell him that it is indeed working, and will hopefully redirect his rage toward the manufacturer.

    2. Re:Since he can't hear the thing... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      This is EXACTLY how to deal with this problem. Everybody pretend it isn't working, and he'll return it to the manufacturer, which will tell him that it is indeed working, and will hopefully redirect his rage toward the manufacturer.

      Yeah, cuz there's no way this guy will be able to find someone under 25 he trusts. I mean he surely won't have any kids or grandkids or nieces or nephews ...

      And then his paranoia WILL be justified; the whole town is somehow out to get him...

      This is dumber than just breaking the device.

      The smart thing to do has been covered countless times:

      Step 0: Act like mature responsible adults. You want to be taken seriously you've got to look and act the part. This isn't the time to look like your on your way to a Rob Zombie concert. Its not enough that you are legally right; you want them to care about your issue not force them to go through the motions.

      1) Talk to the guy and sincerely try to resolve the problem.
      2) Write him a polite letter. (keep copies)
      3) Approach both police and city/municipal government with pics of device, documentation about device, copy of letter, and a list of witnesses with contact information who will attest to the problem. Preferably have someone older who can hear it do this. Ideally a home-owning parent with young kids. You really shouldn't have any issues getting action done if an entire neighborhood is truly suffering from this.
      4) If all that fails you might also try contacting local media with the story as well. If they cover it, it will goad reticent police or municipal government to act.

    3. Re:Since he can't hear the thing... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      If he were close to anyone under 25, he wouldn't be using this device, as it would be as likely to keep them away as the brats he's trying to drive away.

    4. Re:Since he can't hear the thing... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      If he were close to anyone under 25, he wouldn't be using this device, as it would be as likely to keep them away as the brats he's trying to drive away.

      Or maybe he'd just turn it off when they came over and complained about it.

    5. Re:Since he can't hear the thing... by AshFan · · Score: 1

      Fill a paper bag with dog poop and light it on fire and ring his doorbell. Beware, under the patriot act this is now an act of terrorism.

  103. Noise Cancelling won't work by dww · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unless you can EXACTLY duplicate the signal - which you can't - and transmit its inverse from EXACTLY the same point - which you can't - noise cancelling over an area will not work. It works in headphones because the area covered is much smaller than the sound wavelength - that is not so here.

    Imagine throwing two stones into a quiet pond. The two expanding waves will intersect and cancel at some points - but half a wavelength further on they will be in phase and so double. So it will be with the sound - varying from silent to twice as loud depending where you are. As the wavelength will be small, moving your head will be very uncomfortable! You can try the effect if you play the clean MP3 sample you'll find at http://www.star94.com/shows/index.cfm?show=cr&cid= 63 in a small room, where there will be lots of echoes. I'm 60 but I can hear it if I turn the volume up, a high pitched warble that changes in a very disconcerting way when I move my head. (Not everyone over 25 is deaf!)

    Meanwhile - IGNORE the idiots here suggesting various illegal measures. Those WILL get the police involved, but not in the way you want. However, if you could get the authorities to recognise the problem (get the neighbours to all complain to your local councillor as well as the police), you may be able to persuade them to take out an ASBO against the offender preventing him from continuing the nuisance. (For our US friends, an ASBO is an "Anti-Social Behaviour Order", and ignoring it becomes a criminal offence).

    1. Re:Noise Cancelling won't work by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1
      (For our US friends, an ASBO is an "Anti-Social Behaviour Order", and ignoring it becomes a criminal offence).

      And now I know why V for Vendetta was set in the UK.
  104. This Will End It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just tell the old man one day that you think it's hilarious how someone broke his system and he can't even hear that it's not working anymore. If a few kids start laughing at him he'll think it is broken and have to take it back. Rinse and repeat as necessary.

  105. If he can't hear it... by Onuma · · Score: 0, Troll

    If this person can't hear the noise, how does he know it's operating properly at all? Does he just assume that the influx of complaints is an affirmation of the mosquito's noise working?

    It should just be a normal speaker wire or coaxial cable running to this device, either inconspicuously use some wire cutters on it, or otherwise discreetly disable the line itself. It doesn't take a electrical engineer to screw up some speaker wire, and he won't know if the sound has stopped.

    For gags too, you could put a slow tap of arsenic in his water pipes so he gets stomach cancer-like symptoms and dies. That's just the more sadistic side of me though :) I mean, he's 80...do you really think they'd do an autopsy to figure out the cause of death? Dubiously. [/jokes]

    --
    What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  106. Neighbor's dog barking is just as bad by noidentity · · Score: 1

    I have a somewhat related situation, that of a neighbor putting their little-but-fucking-noisy dog outside on the porch to bark all god damn day long (9:22 AM through 8:30 PM), for several hours averaging one half bark per second. When I moved here almost two years ago, the neighborhood was quiet and I could open my door during the day. Would the neighborhood association rules be of use in having the neighbor eliminate this sound?

    1. Re:Neighbor's dog barking is just as bad by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      We had a problem like that back when I was in college. We would par^H^H^Hstudy all night and I would just crash at his pad. The neighbor would put her butt ugly little yappy dog out about 6 am and the fucker would just bark all morning. After about 3 days of this he my friend had, had enough. Well one shot with a .22 rifle later, one last yap, and we slept in peace till noon.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  107. Try being nice to him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's no fun being old. Just talk to him and see what his problem is. I do hope /. does not reflect current American suburban behaviour. Getting along with your neighbor is a good place to start making peace.

  108. move away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    move away

  109. Rave It Up! by Blackbird_Highway · · Score: 1

    Just start going to raves every night. You'll quickly damage your own hearing, and won't be able to hear it anymore. Yes, this is a joke! Go talk nicely to the guy! Talk in a mature manner and don't threaten or use profanity. It might be a good idea to even carry a concealed recorder. This can help in several ways: 1) You might be able to get him to remove the device once he realizes it is annoying even beyond his own property. 2) You might find out what he is pissed off about, correct it, and get him to remove the device. 3) You might get him to at least admit the device is installed just to annoy others 4) You will at least be able to prove that you talked to him and asked him nicely to remove the device. These last two points, along with the recording, can help you tremendously if you decide to go to small claims court. Most judges will be pleased with you if you can show that you tried to resolve the matter in a civilized way and the other party refused to cooperate. The judge will then find in your favor, get him to remove the device and probably fine him a small amount as well. Before going to the court, follow up the verbal communication with a letter. Again, the letter should be mature and must not include profanity. It should be serious, and explain carefully that he is having a deleterious effect outside his own property. Mention in the letter that you have verbally asked him to remove the device. Assuming it doesn't work, take this letter to the court as well. There is actually a good chance that you will be able to resolve the conflict without either court action or violence. Once you have succeeded with that, head on over to the middle east and resolve that conflict!

    --
    By the perception of illusion, we experience reality
  110. Sauce for the goose... by Frodrick · · Score: 1

    "As the Mosquito emits a sound that's well out of his hearing range, he can't hear it, while most of the rest of the neighborhood is under 40 and can; at which point it's causing everyone a great deal of discomfort."

    Perhaps the older folks are really unaware of how annoying the sound is. Construct a device that emits a similar noise, but at a lower frequency that everyone can hear - maybe 3000 hz to 5000 hz.

    If you really want this to work, only turn it on when he turns his machine on - and KEEP YOUR BIG MOUTH SHUT! Then, either he will think his machine is no good and get rid of it -or- the entire neighborhood will go after HIM.

  111. Tewkesbury Mosquito by JRiddell · · Score: 1

    I was harrassed by one of these devices in England. They usually affect only people under 20. The Mosquito is intended to act as a teenager repellent and works well except that it's fantastically immoral and illegal to harass innocent people in this way. It's pretty dangerous too for babies who's parents don't realise they've left the buggy underneath this noise. Fortunately after I complained the shop took it down.. blog entry.

  112. Here's a novel idea... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

    Why not try reasoning with him?

    Talk to him politely, tell him that the device annoys you and your friends to no end, but that you understand why he would put it up in the first place. Ask him if there is something in particular that prompted him to install the device. Then ask him if he would be so kind as to turn it off, and that you in turn would make sure that your friends (of course, it never was you!) stay off his lawn, do not play loud music after 10pm, throw eggs at his house on Halloween night, or do whatever it was that you did to piss him off in the first place.

    Of course, you must make sure you hold your end of the bargain, otherwise all bets are off.

    You'll be surprise how effective a short face-to-face encounter in good terms can be. At the very least, it shows you respect him, and that you're willing to reason with him, so if he retorts with a loud "FUCK YOU, YOU LITTLE PISS-HEAD!! AND GET OFF MY PROPERTAH!!!", you can tell the police you tried your best.

            -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  113. bring da noise! by Dr.+Max+E.+Ville · · Score: 1

    If your over-40 neighbours are making all the noise, you have some serious problems. Play some Rage against the machine at 120 dB, and they'll get the picture very soon...

  114. Re:Ask Slashdot? - Civil Lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is one of those time a civil lawsuit is probably in order. The illegal device the old person bought is specifically designed to annoy young people by way of emitting ultra-sonic (to old people) sounds that, well, annoy young people. Take lots of pictures of the device on the old person's property, turned on and set to do its deed. Get young witnesses to sign affidavits attesting to the audible and annoying nature of the sound. Then all you have to do is also enter all of the product literature for this particular device into the court record. Since this device is specifically designed for one purpose -- to annoy young people -- and its sound emissions do not stay on the property of the old owner, the old owner is certainly responsible for what it is doing to the young people's enjoyment of their own private property and any adjoining public property.

    Of course, first sending a very gracious but firm certified letter asking for the removal of the nuisance can only help your side look good and reasonable.

  115. Two words ... by JoeGee · · Score: 1

    HERF gun. I'd bet these same police wouldn't have the faintest idea what one is ...

    --

    Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
  116. Brick by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No, really.

    If you cant get the police to encforce their noise ordinance ( everyone has one ) take a brick and take care of the situation.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  117. Easy to disable by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    It uses a cheap Pizeo tweeter. take the four screws off the tweeter, cut one wire, screw tweeter back in place.

    This "new and revolutionary" device is old as dirt. I remember building pain field generators with that exact tweeter (ok 20 of them) back in high school. 20 tweeters in a series,parallel, amplifier, signal generator start sweeping until people complain, turn it to 11!

    Hell this thing is even cheezy-made. It's in a halogen lamp housing and probably has less than a 10 watt amp in there.

    Want to have more fun? open case, find where the signal generator goes to the audio amp, cut that trace and install a wire antenna on the amplifier input side. now the local AM radio station. and all CB users will come over it like a speaker.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  118. Get them to document and explain their refusal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Talk to the local police chief and explain that you simply want something in writing, saying *why* they won't help you. You're looking for two admissions:

    1. The cops can't see/hear anything, therefore there is no offense.
    2. Because the signal originates inside his property, it's OK.


    Once you have that signed statement in hand, go rent a 5-watt infrared cutting laser. While standing on your own lawn, set the guy's landscaping on fire.
    1. Re:Get them to document and explain their refusal. by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      you tell me where and how much i can rent one for and i am there.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  119. We had something vaguely similar happen... by zoward · · Score: 1

    ...in the neighborhood I used to live in. One of our neighbors had a sixteen year old who liked to ride his dirt bike in cricles around their lawn. There's no formal law against this, as the muffler on the bike was at or below "acceptable" noise standards, and he didn't ride after 9 pm. However, the noise, and the large billows of blue smoke wafting through our back yards (all of which were closely situated) drove us crazy. It got so none of us could use our back yards that summer. We asked our neighbor to find his son somewhere else to ride the bike, and he told us to go to hell. We called the cops every time he was out there - not because they'd actually do something about it, but so we could display the call records as evidence in court. We finally ended up filing a formal comaplint and took him to court. I hated to do this. I'm a big believer in individual rights, but he was making our lives miserable. The magistrate concluded that what he was doing could indeed be considered disturbing the peace, and he was forced to find his son another place to ride until the son turned 17, when he bought a street bike.

    If I were you, I'd talk to a lawyer. Even if what he's doing is legal, it can still be a public nuisance, and there may be local laws which cover this.

    --
    "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
  120. Noise cancellation by xiang+shui · · Score: 1

    I haven't looked to see if anyone has suggested this already; but I ain't got time to read through 50,000 postings from people who secretly wish they were lawyers, so I'll just go ahead and blurt it out.

    What you need to do is build some kind of noise cancellation device, where it records the sound the of mosquito machine, and plays back the inverted wave. I can't give you any more details on that because I'll risk sounding like someone who secretly wants to be a physicist, and I'm not.

    I'm sure there's plenty of info out there on how to go about doing that - but the important thing is that you know it can be done.

  121. Try asking for a younger police officer... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, how hard can it be....?

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Try asking for a younger police officer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      hm, keep in mind that police are often.... whats the word..... assholes.

    2. Re:Try asking for a younger police officer... by shicaca · · Score: 0

      The only problem with that is that many police officers suffer some degree of hearing loss due to the lack of use of ear protection when going to shooting ranges and such. Because of this, it doesn't really surprise me all-that-much that almost all the police can't hear it. I think, really, the only way to do anything about it is to record it and somehow digitally take it off, edit the wavelength, and see where it gets you with the police. You'd definitely have to have the police right there through the whole process, but if that was happening to me I'd be TICKED.

    3. Re:Try asking for a younger police officer... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, how hard can it be....?

      The submission is almost certainly fiction. Not only does it sound manufactured, but quite a few of us, err, "old folks" (I'm 33) can hear 16Khz noises. I have no trouble hearing the mosquito buzzer, as can many other people who didn't abuse their hearing in their youth.

    4. Re:Try asking for a younger police officer... by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      Oh? I'm 25, can't hear it, and i didn't 'abuse my hearing' as you put it. People who use firearms with any frequency will lose that portion of their hearing much faster than most people. It's quite likely that any officer won't be able to hear it due to the frequency required on weapons qualifications.

      For the record, I'm in the USAF, and I fire two weapons once a year each, the M-16A2 and the M9. In all likelyhood, I probably wouldn't have been able to hear it at 22 or 23. We're also required to use hearing protection during all shooting phases of qualification.

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
    5. Re:Try asking for a younger police officer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former law enforcer, I concur on this point. People who go to the ranges a lot can't hear anything. Another young neighbor as a witness would do the trick though.

    6. Re:Try asking for a younger police officer... by Explo · · Score: 1

      Or he/she could ask for an independent specialist, such as a (preferably young) doctor to certify that a) the noise is there and b) it's seriously annoying for all people who can hear that frequency range. If no peaceful resolution can be reached, then suing the old man for causing public discomfort with the specialist as a witness should do the trick with less risk of interesting tightening circles of revenge, unlike the various straight-from-the-caves - brute force solutions.

      --
      Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.
    7. Re:Try asking for a younger police officer... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The submission is almost certainly fiction.

      I concluded long ago that most "Ask Slashdot" articles were as credible as "Letters to Penthouse". Mix up a bunch of issues in a "movie of the week" style and ask a leading question.

    8. Re:Try asking for a younger police officer... by tacarat · · Score: 1

      "I concluded long ago that most "Ask Slashdot" articles were as credible as "Letters to Penthouse"."

      Dear Slashdot,
      I never thought I'd ever be writing to you, but this story was too good to pass up. It happened last week saturday. I was on the red-eye raid (couldn't make the earlier ones, and I need the DKP) with my guild, mostly Aussies and Kiwis with some of the east asian American GI's. It was really inconvenient because my windoze box had a terminal meltdown, so I was stuck at the local PC gaming cafe. Anyhow, somebody tapped on my shoulder and asked if I needed a soda or anything. Glancing over my shoulder (we were just bs'ing before the raid), I saw this gorgeous redheaded grrrrrl. She was about to take a 15 minute break and wanted to see if I needed anything before she went. Slightly bent over, her breasts hung seductively in her "Kill Bill" tank top (the one with Tux instead of Uma Thurman).

      Needless to say, I could think of something I needed from her...

      Want to read more? Subscribe with geekerotica.slashdot.org! Only 3 phat lewtz a month, and you can get a guild invite from CmdrTaco if you subscribe now! Our outsourced data entry experts are waiting to hear from you now!

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  122. According to the Mosquito ad, the effective range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is between 15 and 20 metres. Exactly how close are you getting to this guy?

    In addition, ultrasonic noise is stopped by just about anything between you and the thing creating it, unlike bass frequencies. That's why foghorns don't sound like high-pitched little insects.

  123. I'm 40 and I can *EASILY* hear that... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    All this stuff about "anybody over the age of 25 can't..." is just bullshit.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:I'm 40 and I can *EASILY* hear that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a generalization, but it does apply to a majority of the population. Like others on here I have always protected my hearing, avoided loud bars and parties, not turned up my iPod, etc etc. As a result I can still hear these tones where most of my peers in the same age range cannot.

  124. Have you verified? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
    Have you verified that it's actually a Mosquito Device? Because if she has an older television, say from the mid 1980s, her flyback transformer could have started to let go. Some of those televisions had an "instant-on" mode that basically kept the flyback running forever and just deactivated the tuner and the gun. I can remember sleeping on the couch at my aunt and uncle's house and I had to unplug the TV because of a noise they claimed didn't exist. I could hear it everywhere in the house.

    If you want evidence, get a microphone and hook it to your laptop. Invite a cop or at least a witness over, show them how the pretty histogram bounces up and down as you talk, then point the microphone at Crazy Lady's house and show him the huge spike at 18 kHz. Make sure Crazy Lady isn't wise to your evidence collecting.

    If she really is crazy, maybe she's crazy enough to accidently burn her own house down and try to blame the neighbor kids who braved the flames to rescue her, packed her suitcase with three changes of clothing, her Bible and all of her pills, then drove her down to the bus station and made sure she got on the bus with $100 and a ticket to a random city on the opposite side of the country. Know what I mean?

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  125. destroy it by bestnameever.com · · Score: 1

    Just blast it with a shotgun or m-80's or something. Yeah she could replace it but surely she doesn't have the stamina you youngsters have, you can outlast her!

  126. Peace or war by RokcetScientist · · Score: 0

    Want peace? Xiang is right: noise cancellation is by far the best solution. Then you under-forty guys won't hear the sound anymore, and your gregarious neighbor - who never heard it to begin with - thinks it's (still) working and will relax too: everybody's happy! Want war? Make the police or other authorities hear it too: record the sound and play it back at a lower pitch! A pitch that IS audible to over forties! Have fun in court...

  127. a few dozen flood lights should do the trick by OverNeith · · Score: 1


    If this neighbor is bordering your property, and especially if the bedroom is near the edge of your house, you're perfectly within your rights to install security flood lighting around your property. (Even if it happens to be attached to a tree, aimed in an no so precice direction.)

    Get some 12v lighting, and replace the bulbs with the annoying high temp blue bulbs that you see kids installing in their cars. (some minor modifications may be required for the car lamps to fit, as well as heat testing) A few dozen of those around your property should make it look like the surface of the sun. And hey, if your friendly neighbors are also in need of some security lighting (speciffically the ones surrounding his property) provide some free consulting services on installing a system for them.

  128. Nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he has a porch; got a dog? got a bag? got some gas? since he can not hear, perhaps he can not smell either.

  129. The nnnnn noise from PC fans are more annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm past 40 and I can still hear those high pitched whinny fans from PCs even when they are enclosed and supposed to be silent. Funny thing is the younger teens and geeks don't seem to be bothered by them. I guess annoyance is in the ear of the beholder then.

  130. Who cares? by MikTheUser · · Score: 2, Funny

    This Slashdot story has more potential for talk about ardware hacking, physics babbling, paranoia nursing and 2AM-James-Bond-action than anything I've read here in months. I don't mind a link to a store in a story this intriguing.

  131. Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get off my damn lawn.

    Kids.

  132. Old people can't hear low frequencies either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old people can't hear low frequencies anymore than they can hear high frequencies. So get a really big, high powered speaker, aim it at this home and play something down around 30 cycles. Really make the dishes shake. Repeat frequently. He'll think it's earthquakes and move to Florida. The older police won't be able to hear it either, so you're even.

  133. Here's what I did... by Lime+Green+Bowler · · Score: 1

    Long time ago, my mother bought some of these devices that supposedly repelled bugs, mosquitos etc. They were a set of four, and she put them in various places in the house. Likewise, they drove my ears frickin' bananas.

    Take advantage of the fact that the old people, and do what I did: opened the boxes up and clipped the wire leading to the transducers.

    The man can't hear the noise. Get access to the thing. Open it up. Do a little surgery.

  134. three words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the brown note

  135. I always wondered if I could hear that by usurper_ii · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link. I have to say after hearing it, if you can't hear that, you are freaking deaf. And I'll add that I'm way past 25 and spent way too much time listening to loud heavy metal as a teenager.

    But what I would have always wondered, if that many people over 25 can't hear things like that, how many people are getting ripped off on high-end speakers and high-quality stereo equipment?

    Somewhere, I bet there are older people complaing about MP3 and ACC audio not being high enough quality, and all the while they couldn't even hear a good portion of the high-end of the original CD that the songs came off of.

    Transporter_ii

    1. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      It's the woofers that cost. Tweeters are dirt-cheap. I used to have a pair of speakers that had in addition to tweeters what Kenwood called "super-tweeters", with a range that reportedly started at 16 kHz.

      It would be a waste today, CDs can't reproduce tones that high accurately.

      However, those high tones that I couldn't hear if I still had those speakers color the lower frequency sounds I can hear. Take a high pitched tone and mix it with a low pitched tone and look at it on an oscilloscope, you'll see what I mean.

      Even with my old ears my Presence CD doesn't have the presence that my Presence LP does. Of course, part of that is the shitty remastering they did on the CD.

      And frequency response isn't the only thing to suffer when you compress audio. You also lose dynamics.

      If you ever hear an old fashioned telephone ring in the distance when you're listening to a CD, that's aliasing distortion. You don't need great ears to hear it, either.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by Achra · · Score: 1

      Hm. I just tried an experiment.. I'm 28, with moderate hearing loss. I used to be in a rock band, and I've blown one eardrum. I can't focus on conversations if there is ambient noise such as a TV in the room.

      When I turned that sound on, I could definitely hear a very high pitched noise on the edge of hearing. It seemed irritating, but apparently not as irritating to me as to my 5 young children.. They all came running in from outside of the house and begged me to turn off that horrific noise. They described it as a terrible shrieking, like a girl screaming. They also couldn't imagine how I was sitting in the SAME ROOM WITH IT.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    3. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      CDs can reproduce signals up to 22.05kHz. It seems like you have some sort of audio background. How could you possibly think that CDs can't reproduce anything above 16kHz? Does Nyquist mean anything to you? CDs have a sample rate of 44.1kHz. They can thus encode tones up to 22.05kHz. This is a mathematical law. Whether or not all your gear in the signal chain AFTER the CD can reproduce up to 22.05kHz, that's their business. But the spectrum is there on the CD.

    4. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Yes, they can decode tones up to half the sample rate (nyquist limit). However, the closer to the nyquist limit, the more aliasing there is. A 16k tone has only 3 samples per wave crest. You can't discern between a sawtooth wave, square wave, or a sine wave with only 3 samples per crest.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    5. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      Right, but what's the first harmonic of a 16kHz tone? 32kHz. That is why the bandlimiting step after decoding is so important, and that's why Nyquist states that in order to reproduce signals up to the Nyquist frequency you must bandlimit!

      So what's the difference between a 16kHz sine wave and a 16kHz square or triangle wave that's band-limited to 22kHz?

      (Hopefully none! So aliasing isn't that big of a deal, right?)

    6. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      The difference in the waveform's shape. A sine wave doesn't sound like a square wave, which doesn't sound like a sawtooth wave.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    7. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      I think you might not understand what that actually means. A square wave is a waveform which contains the fundamental and all odd integer harmonics. So if we have a square wave at 10kHz (F=10k), that waveform contains 10kHz (1 * F), 30kHz(3*f), 60kHz(5*f), etc. Each of its component frequencies is, of course a sine tone. Read up on Fourier Transform if you're not following.

      So let's take that 10khz square wave again, which has as its frequencies 10kHz, 30kHz, 60kHz, etc. When we perform a band-limit on that square wave, only allowing frequencies below 22kHz, we are left only with the 10kHz sine wave.

      I hope that you can extrapolate this to the other waveforms -- sawtooth, triangle, etc., which are comprised of the fundamental and various integer harmonics. The point is that by the time a frequency is high enough to only have a few sample points, such that you could not tell what the original waveform was, the post-decoding bandlimiting will force it to be a sine tone (which is what it inevitably should be, if you followed all the encoding constraints a la Nyquist's theorem).

    8. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Give me a break, put down the slide rule and get some graph paper.

      This ^^^^^^^^^^ does NOT sound like this |_|-|_|-|_|

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    9. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      That would be a pretty funny comment if I knew that you were only kidding around...??

      Really, if you don't understand how to turn a square wave into a sine wave (by bandlimiting), you should read up on it. You will then understand why 18k in a 22kHz bandlimited encoding system has to be a sine wave.

      You could start with Sine Waves. But the really important quote to take away from there is:

      Any non-sinusoidal waveforms, such as square waves or even the irregular sound waves made by human speech, are actually a collection of sinusoidal waves of different periods and frequencies blended together. The technique of transforming a complex waveform into its sinusoidal components is called Fourier analysis.
      This page kind of talks about how square waves are made up of sine waves.
    10. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      What you say is true and accurate, but irrelevent. You're not hearing what I'm saying. At middle C (440 hz) you have roughly a thousand samples per crest. At 15k there are three samples per crest. At three samples there is no way to discern the difference between different shaped waves.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    11. Re:I always wondered if I could hear that by horn_in_gb · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is not just relevant, it's crucial to Nyquist's theorem an digital sampling.

      There is, of course, no way to tell what the original waveform was with 15k and 3 samples per crest. But, it is forced into a sine wave because of bandlimiting. It is the harmonics of that 15k fundamental which would make it a square wave, a triangle wave, etc. Those harmonics are filtered. Everything above 22.05kHz is removed. The square wave is turned into a sine wave. The triangle wave is turned into a sine wave.

      And that's what we want. Because if you followed the rules of bandlimiting when you encoded the signal, only a 15kHz sine wave would have been encoded (you could have fed it a square wave, but all the harmonics that made it square would have been chopped off). At 15kHz only the sine-wave fundamental frequency would make it in to the encoded signal, and only a 15kHz sine wave will come out.

      Does this make more sense to you? I think what you're not understanding is that a wave shape other than sine wave simply means that there is more than one frequency to that signal.

  136. Get out a mic and a laptop... by no_such_user · · Score: 1

    Why not show this to the cops on a spectrum analyzer? Just get a mic and an app which displays freq vs amplitude.

  137. Midnight Fix by Laurion · · Score: 1

    Just sneak onto his property at midnight, or even 10pm, when the old coot is sound asleep, and open the unit up and sever one of the wires or whatnot inside the unit, then put it all back together.

    If he's as old and codgery as you say, he'll just think the unit died.

    If he buys a new one, repeat. Eventually he'll stop buying them as a waste of money.

    --
    "Is this not a rare fellow, my lord? He's as good at any thing, and yet a fool." -from "As You Like It", Act 5,
  138. Turn it off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It probably has a light or someway to tell you when it's turned on (besides the buzzing that he can't hear)? Just sneak into his yard, crack it open and disconnect the annoying part but leave the light intact. He'll never know it's not working because he can't hear it.

    Alternatively find someone with a dog and get them to call the SPCA for harassing the dog.

    Steve

    1. Re:turn it off by dwbassett42 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Or instead of all the obvious and stupid destruction of property, instead clip a wire or something in it so flipping the 'on' switch doesn't do anything. It won't work, and he can't tell the difference.

  139. a lesson here by scifiber_phil · · Score: 1

    Mosquito device annoying youths with its sound? Now you know how I feel every time your subwoofers rattle my windows more than a block away. There is a lesson here if you can see it.

    1. Re:a lesson here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mosquito device annoying youths with its sound? Now you know how I feel every time your subwoofers rattle my windows more than a block away. There is a lesson here if you can see it.


      I don't get rattling, but I do hear them from 5 or 6 blocks away. And being omnidirectionnal, you can't know which car makes that noise (because face it, "boom-boom-boom" isn't music, it just annoys the hell out of people) and so can't call the police so they can do anything about it.
  140. Re:Ask Slashdot? - Civil Lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (1) He's a young person
    (2) He posts on Slashdot

    I think the chances of him being good and reasonable are slim to none.

  141. Kill him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old people die all the time. No one will miss an SOB like this. Falling down the stairs is normal for people like him, and he probably won't be discovered for weeks. Its easy. Do it.

    Or.... destroy the device. Don't listen to moralizing fags on /. saying "oh no, 2 wrongs, bad ,ohhhh" because that is bullshit. Legal options have been exausted. Destroy the device.

  142. turn it off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    turn it off, if he can't hear it he'll never know.

  143. Plan B by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    Hire an actor, rent a van, put on a vinyl sign "Mosquito Eater repairman" (or whatever the device is called), the actor will tell him he is there to repair the device, shake head and say the dilithium crystals are shot, get a "new" mosquito eater from the van, replace it with one that looks like it works but doesn't really it just lights up.

  144. REAL Audio Measurements + Lawsuit = :) by mikelieman · · Score: 1

    Get it measured, and documented by a real audio pro. Then sue him.

    Can't argue with objective, professional measurements.

    --
    Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  145. His mischief shall return upon his own head by E++99 · · Score: 1

    1) Buy or borrow a directional speaker, and aim it at his house. 2) Download an mp3 of a dog barking 3) Play on a loop 4) Call him to complain that his device is making your dog bark.

    1. Re: His mischief shall return upon his own head by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Yea. Then they would come after you for having a dog that barks.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  146. I don't get it... by hummassa · · Score: 1
    Do those devices have a 3-mile radius of range? Because, if not, it's a lot easier just to stay out of range. Come on, if the old geezer does not want you around his yard, why do you have to hang out just there? Call your friends to your home, set up a good monopoly game or other table game. Just get as far away as you can from the device. Cheaper. Easier.
    For anyone who has moral concerns over smashing the property of an elderly person, said person should take into consideration the fact that this elderly person has installed a device which targets young neighbors regardless of their actions or behavior. Punishing all individuals of a given group regardless of guilt is certainly immoral. Furthermore, said elderly neighbor has plenty of options through the local police department in dealing with disturbances and has no right to take things into their own hands.
    I'm sure that is why the old geezer put the thing up there anyway. "regardless of their actions" is a bit strong -- someone is hanging around there, aren't you? and are they perfectly silent and peaceful everytime? not? The mosquito thing is better than the old solutions of spraying cold water or throwing eggs.
    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:I don't get it... by yndrd1984 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      it's a lot easier just to stay out of range.
      Yes. It's usually easier not to stand up for your rights and just take it. But that's the philosophy of slaves and peasants.

      "regardless of their actions" is a bit strong -- someone is hanging around there, aren't you?
      Yes, those horrid teenagers are sitting in their back yard or walking down a public sidewalk, so they deserve what they get![/sarcasm]

      are they perfectly silent and peaceful everytime? not?
      Let's attack an entire group for the actions of a few of them! That's so stupid and immoral I never would have thought of it!

      The mosquito thing is better than the old solutions of spraying cold water or throwing eggs.
      No, it's just harder to get the police to do their duty. If he was doing as you suggest, to people accross the street, he could be prosecuted for assault. By doing it this way he can get away with noise ordinance violations.

  147. Scotch tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's amazing what a piece of scotch tape placed strategically over the sound emitting port of most modern electronics will do. In this case, it would also have the benefit of avoiding vandalism.

    Of course, you would have to trespass to place it there...

    1. Re:Scotch tape by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Long distance tape gun!

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  148. here is an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go talk to him. reason with him. he is not a troll, he is just old and probably a little disconnected from society. ever read to kill a mockingbird?

  149. EMP blast! by Xtravar · · Score: 1

    Set off an EMP blast to take out all of his electronics!! If you're lucky, it'll take out the Mosquito, his hearing aids, and his pacemaker!

    --
    Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  150. Backfires! by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

    They tried this as experiment at a Rotterdam bus station. It barely has any effect and in fact backfired as youth learned to use it to their advantage - albeit in a completely different way. The "Mosquitone" ringtone is a high frequency sound and indeed: none of my co-workers can hear it (they're all early to late 30s), but I (29) can and although the correlation is obviously not 100%, it works most of the time. So teenagers use it in classrooms.. they can hear text messages coming in but the teacher does not.. clever.

    And it's not unbearably annoying anyway. It's just like the noise you hear after a rough gig or party.

  151. stringed mosquitos? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1
    Viola, no mosquito.
    You're right, violas don't sound much like mosquitos. But sometimes violins do.
    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  152. A more legal recourse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call the police about alarm. After the 2nd time, they start charging $$$ for false alarms. Construction company gets the message, fixes it. Or not...then I'd cut the wires.

  153. Prognosis isn't great but... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
    he can't hear it...the police also can't hear it
    Seek help.

    Hmmm...I see /. now flash ads up while you're trying to write a comment. I think this may be the last time I visit this web site.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  154. No cops under Thirty? by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
    Somehow, I sense a troll ... are there no eager rookie cops? Nobody on the force under 30?

    Also, a recording audiometer would show the frequency (which BTW, doesn't go very far)

  155. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Did you ever consider that maybe because he can't HEAR it he doesn't know there is a problem? Can you talk to him about it calmly and respectfully, or have you already become such bitter rivals that you would/could never do that..

    While I agree with the vein of your argument, the above comment just shows that you don't know anything about this thread. The device he installed does only one thing: create a high-pitch annoying noise that generally can't be heard by older people who have lost that range. He certainly knows there's a problem, because he purchased a device developed to create this problem.

    1. Re:WTF? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Agreed.... while it is better to talk out ones problems... and better not to damage peoples property... this is obnoxious. There are really two ways to go here.

      1) go down to the police station and try to talk to someone. When you walk in on your own and calmly try to explain your situation, you can usually find some pretty calm people who will gladly discuss your options, or tell you that you have none.

      The key to dealing with police... never get aggrevated or show either fear or agression. They win ALL agressive encounters. The number they lose is so small, that its not worth considering that it happens.

      2) disable the device... poke some holes in its speaker element.... clip the leads. Do it when hes sleeping. The problem with old people is you never know when they are up and looking out windows. They often don't get as much sleep as younger people and wake up for bathroom runs in the middle of the night and stay up (at least, the ones I know do)

      Since he can't hear it... he will never know.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a party full of teenagers annoys older people, it's a noise violation, and lots of cops show up.

      If an old person who can't hear high-frequency sounds blasts an ultrasonic siren at his younger neighbors, the cops laugh.

      WTF.

      Of course, where I live (Newark, Delaware), there's a law that "car radios and other music-producing devices must not be audible more than 50 feet away." There's also been legislation that's something like, "Noise must mean a party which must mean 'violence' (underage drinking)" -- there's been a huge backlash, but, nobody gives a shit what the students want, even though they are the ones paying the administrators' salaries (did you know our univ. president is the 3rd highest paid in the country?)
      -os

    3. Re:WTF? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Wow Delaware, theres a state I thought only existed to charge tolls to people driving through.

      Anyway, yah I bet its an uphill battle. Usually is when it involves asking the town to step in, especially when something isn't flagrant and easy to see, like drunk students being a nuissance (and they often are)

      I would get a brocure for the device from the company, and bring that to the police station. show them what the company claims, and then tell them this guy is using one of these in you rneighborhood. Its one thing if they can't hear it, that just means you have to step up the proof.

      If the police don't want to help, then take it up the chain. Go down to town hall. Try to talk to an alderman or selectman... or whatever your locality has. You want to know why the police and town cowtow to old people? its because they know how to make a nuissance of themselves at city hall.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  156. Assault? Bull shit. by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Everything I hear about those device is that if you pass them by, you will not notice it (amongst other urban sounds) but if you try to hang around it, it'll ANNOY you. And annoying is not assaulting. No one is forcing you to hang around the old geezer's porch.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Assault? Bull shit. by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 1

      You conveniently missed the part where the old guy's his next-door neighbor. What's he supposed to do -- move to another house?

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
    2. Re:Assault? Bull shit. by Elemenope · · Score: 1

      You also conveniently missed the testimony of several /.ers (of all ages) who claimed that the sound was *actually physically painful*. But, hey! Who cares, right? Facts shouldn't get in the way of a good analysis.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
  157. Just remember by portwojc · · Score: 1

    Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity.

    -Unknown, Hanlon's Razor

    1. You could just politely ask him what it would take to shut it off.
    2. Find a younger cop.
    3. Go to the town meeting and bring it up. Do the research and show stats. Sound ordances are there for a reason. Technology changes so should the laws.

    I'd go with #3 first. Either that or do what the first poster said. Get off damn his lawn.

    The real question is what did you do to piss this guy off.

  158. EMP by martinussen · · Score: 1

    Sure, that's one way of doing it, but since this is Slashdot there is one more way that must be mentioned. Not only more fun and geekish, but also has the potential to be used several times. Build a very small, capacitor-based EMP unit and roast the box. A one-way off switch has its uses.

  159. How untrue is that 'over 30' claim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just downloaded the mosquito 'ringtone' from the NPR story on this nuisance device?
    Most people over 30 supposedly can't hear this?

    I'm almost 26, and I can here it just FINE -- it's annoying.
    It also scared my cats. It could be argued that this device is meant to torture animals -- that might get the coot into hot water.

    Note that the speakers I used don't have good high-frequency response -- with better speakers, it might have been louder and more irritating of a noise.

    PS - don't physically trespass or retaliate. These devices aren't meant for dense neighborhoods, and clearly the coot knows this is going to annoy a LOT of people in the neighborhood. His plan is not to annoy you into leaving the neighborhood, but to cause you to do property or physical harm (or threaten to). He's waiting for you with a shotgun or a video camera and either way you're not going to win.

    I'm not a lawyer, but in some areas it wouldn't be illegal to steal his trash once it is on the curb. There might be something incriminating you can report him for, like tax fraud (you could get lucky). You can do a background check on him. It's pretty tough to get old without having done SOMETHING wrong you hope no one finds out about.

  160. Garden Hose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Wait for him to leave for a weekend or so. 2) Insert garden hose into basement window. 3) Turn water on.

    1. Re:Garden Hose by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      don't forget to unplug sump-pump also...

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  161. Re:Try this: Sony CRT by dopaz · · Score: 1

    I have a 36" Sony CRT HD capable TV. The first thing I noticed about it was that it didn't emit the typical high pitched noise that other TVs do. I would guess it has a higher scanning frequency.

  162. As nicely?.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you asked him nicely if he would turn off the dang thing?

  163. That's a great idea! by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    I probably would have gone crazy and snuck over at night to dismantle the thing after a few days of putting up with that whine.

    That's a really good idea! Sneak over at night, pop the case open, and disconnect the buzzer! He won't know if you put it back together properly because he can't hear it anyway and it'll look the same. This is, of course, providing the device is on the outside of his house. But this is way better than that anything in the revenge book from amazon mentioned earlier

  164. Yeah, it's definitely the submitter's fault! by freeweed · · Score: 1

    You do of course realize that if the old guy has installed this device, he probably realizes that it is driving people nuts, as that is its sole intended purpose?

    Your advice is the equivalent of GWB trying to talk politely with Osama, and tell him "hey, dude, you know those planes? They really hurt our feelings, man".

    No. Shit. Sherlock. That was kinda the idea.

    I've dealt with neighbours like this before. They're fully aware of what they're doing. THAT'S THE POINT. This isn't some big misunderstanding and lack of community hugging due to suburbanites locking themselves in their McMansions and not chatting over the clothesline like in the 1940s. The guy is a prick, he knows it, and what he's done is a pretty clear demonstration of that fact.

    In terms of solving the problem, city noise ordinances should do. Unfortunately, we don't have laws against being an asshole (yet), so my advice to the submitter is "move". If he isn't kicking off any time soon, you're just going to deal with the next level of his tricks. And so on.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Yeah, it's definitely the submitter's fault! by gregorio · · Score: 1
      You do of course realize that if the old guy has installed this device, he probably realizes that it is driving people nuts, as that is its sole intended purpose?

      Your advice is the equivalent of GWB trying to talk politely with Osama, and tell him "hey, dude, you know those planes? They really hurt our feelings, man".

      No. Shit. Sherlock. That was kinda the idea.
      Holy crap!

      Best

      comparison

      ever.

      Really :).
  165. huh? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    This isn't mosquito noise (like recordings of bugs) This is a single high-pitched tone from something like a piezo-electric buzzer. There isn't a range of sounds, but an individual tone. Mosquito is simply the devices name

  166. Here's an idea by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Contact the FCC and claim the device is messing with something of yours, like a baby monitor or whatever.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  167. Simple smash it or call the cops by Tweekster · · Score: 1

    Either take a baseball bat to said device in the middle of the night. Or call the police for distrubing the peace.

    It doesnt require an ask slashdot to have balls to solve the problem on your own...or get the authorities involved. Get a young cop over there and they will hear it.

    I would personally just take a baseball bat too it, but thats me.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  168. Simple Solution Where Everbody Wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make friends with the old fart. Then there won't be a need for retaliation and all of you will be happy.

    I know, I know. It lacks the cleverness and satisfaction of revenge and retribution, but you and the old guy need to grow up anyway.

  169. Foamies by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
    Nobody here has yet mentioned foam earplugs. They are designed to block noise. High frequencies are easier to block than low frequencies, so they should be attenuated pretty well by earplugs. I don't have any firsthand experience with the Mosquito device, so I can't give a firsthand report of effectiveness, but foamies make many loud environments tolerable. They are also cheap, so you may only need spend pennies to counter an expensive device.

    A bulk package of foamies can be posted near the edge of the affected area for use by passers by.

    --
    Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
  170. Hat pins work wonders. by TheMCP · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No no, you don't want to do anything he can press charges about, and you shouldn't do anything that isn't a direct step in solving the problem.

    Find the noise device, find its speaker, and stick a hat pin in through the speaker grille to pierce the speaker. Then remove the hat pin and walk away. The hole will cause the speaker to tear itself and will cease making any meaningful volume of noise, and the old coot won't be able to hear the difference. More importantly, he can't really do anything with the police about it because to explain how it's broken he'd have to explain what it's supposed to do in the first place, and then he'd be admitting that your complaints about him were true. He can hardly complain "hey, they broke my illegal noise making machine!"

    1. Re:Hat pins work wonders. by gregmac · · Score: 3, Funny

      More importantly, he can't really do anything with the police about it because to explain how it's broken he'd have to explain what it's supposed to do in the first place, and then he'd be admitting that your complaints about him were true. He can hardly complain "hey, they broke my illegal noise making machine!"

      I remember watching an episode of "Cops" once where a guy called to report a robbery, but was very vague about what was stolen. Eventually, he told them that the guy had stole a few grams of marijuana or something from him, which the officers found quite entertaining, to say the least.

      --
      Speak before you think
    2. Re:Hat pins work wonders. by snilloc · · Score: 1

      My very-small-town local newspaper once had a lost and found number one could call to claim a certain amount of marijuana that had been found. Amusing, to say the least. Given the intelligence of criminals I always wondered if anybody tried to claim it.

    3. Re:Hat pins work wonders. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marijuana smokers are not criminals in any meaningful sense of the word. They commit a crime only unto themselves, and if you really want the government to stop people hurting themselves better outlaw tobacco and alcohol first. Oh and rock-climbing, hill-walking, recreational parachuting, etc. etc.

      Criminals are people who do harm to other people or other people's property. The fact that Marijuana is "criminalized" in this country is a freak of politics, not an indictment of Marijuana smokers.

      If the guy who lost the weed was stupid enough to call in for it, that's because he was in the "stupid" section of the population, not because he was in the "criminal" section. There's very little overlap between the two, contrary to what "America's Dumbest Criminals" tries to teach you. Stupidity in crime is fatal - evolution sorts them out.

    4. Re:Hat pins work wonders. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the guy who lost the weed was stupid enough to call in for it, that's because he was in the "stupid" section of the population, not because he was in the "criminal" section. There's very little overlap between the two, contrary to what "America's Dumbest Criminals" tries to teach you. Stupidity in crime is fatal - evolution sorts them out.

      I think you meant "correlation," not overlap. Don't make it sound like everyone in prosion is John Gotti, who reportedly had in IQ of 140.

  171. "Louie, Louie" By Rice University Marching Band by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Put large speakers outdoor facing neighbor.
    2. Turn on outside monitoring video system.
    3. Get large nervous dog and place in your back yard with some food and water.
    4. Get this recording.
    5. Put it on loop replay and start playing it in the morning when the law allows and stop playing it in the evening when the law requires.
    6. Leave after starting the music.
    7. Don't come back until it's time to turn off the music.

    The recording is of the song "Louie, Louie" played by a variety of bands. My favorite is one by the Rice University Marching Band. I give your neighbor 3 hours tops before he commits an irrational property crime of significant proportion, all recorded on video.

  172. make a small emp by turningcog · · Score: 1

    there have to be plans online. locate the device and disable it. make sure the emp is small otherwise you destroy a lot of things

  173. seek help from someone under 18 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey man, you here that annoying sound? It's coming from the litle black box in that grumpy old bastards yard. I think this is all that needs to be said to a teenager to evoke random acts of vandalism in the wee hours of the night.

  174. He can't hear it... soooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If he can't hear it, the cops can't hear it, how would he know you broke it?

    Its common sense. Don't listen to some of these morally conscious fools, its a victimless crime, any personal property being used as a weapon of mass discomfort is public domain.

  175. Send it right back at him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get another device that is tunable and almost match the frequency of the mosquito, aim it at his house. Your device's sound and his will produce a product of both which is far more annoying. If it is placed right and not too loud, and tuned just right, it will make him so sick he will either go nuts or blame the mosquito for his problems and toss it. The catrch is that if it not done right it will make a lot more people sick as well.

  176. Frequency Conversion - A technical solution by n6gn · · Score: 1

    While I think that a resolution that repairs the relationship is greatly superior, I don't know how to accomplish that. So here's a technical approach -- downconvert and reflect the noise back at him.

    How--
    connect a microphone to your sound card, preferrably a directional one that you can aim at the source of the noise. Find a sound-tools library with filters and code a highpass filter with a ~10 KHz corner. Sample the output of the high-passed spectrum at a 2 ms rate (500 Hz). Apply that output to the input of your 100W subwoofer. Set the subwoofer to have a 250 Hz upper corner, most have an adjustable setting.

    Since there isn't normally much audio power in ambient settings, as long as he's "quiet" there will be no output. However when he fires up, the sampling by your system will downconvert the spectrum from 10 KHz to the upper limit of your hardware, folding it into the 0-250 Hz region where your subwoofer will enthusiastically play it back to him.

    He should quickly discover the correspondence between his having the mosquito noise-maker engaged and that extremely loud and annoying frequency-translated version of it that shakes the side of his home. Not being foolish, he will turn it off at which point your system will go silent except for possibly a "burp" or two from a bat that flies through the microphones pattern.

    As I said, this is really a second rate solution because it doesn't solve the fundamental problem --relationship-- but perhaps it will be interesting.
    n6gn

  177. Consider this by timpintsch · · Score: 1

    I really have no idea where in the country this author lives, but I will say that the mosquitoes in the rural northeast United States have been exceptionally bad of late. I wonder if this man is legitamately trying to keep these insects away from him.

    I personally have found that even tiki-torches and Citronella candles to be marginally effective at best and catching mosquitoes attracted to the light at worst.

    Maybe there is something more effective for what he is trying to use it for. Is there a proven way to effectively and consistently eliminate mosquitoes without containing oneself within a screened cage, annoying others with buzzing sounds or doing bad things to the environment?

  178. invite him to dinner by briancnorton · · Score: 1

    How about making friends with him? He's less likely to try and harass his friends and more likely to listen to their complaints if he knows you on a personal level. Have him over for a beer and cards. Say hi in the street. Help him clear debris out of his yard after a storm. It's amazing how quickly we think to resort to terrorist methods instead of being civilized.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  179. two words: brown noise by Luxifer · · Score: 1

    set up a kickass speaker system and turn it up to eleven with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_note/.

  180. Re:Try this: Sony CRT by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    I would guess it has a higher scanning frequency.

    Or better insulation.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  181. Police hearing the device is irrelevant... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    If the device is visibly installed on the property and can be identified as this "Mosquito ultrasonic teenage deterrent", then local noise ordinances can be enforced by the police. Just because they can't hear it doesn't prove it's not operating and disturbing the f**k out of everyone else.

    Another option is to form a homeowner's association in the neighborhood and draft by-laws that prohibit the installation of such devices, thereby creating civil recourse for its removal.

    The final option I'll suggest is to get a quorum of your neighbors to meet with this guy and talk this whole mess out! Stop playing stupid juvenile games and start having an adult reaction to this. If there are many people in the neighborhood that this guy is aggravating, or if you and other neighbors are truly aggravating him, then agree to compromise on issues. I thought modern society had evolved beyond this sort of juvenile behavior, but it seems not.

    1. Re:Police hearing the device is irrelevant... by BillX · · Score: 1

      How would any homeowner association be legally binding on someone who moved there before you established it? To put it in slashdot terms, that's like revising the EULA on packaged software someone bought years ago and trying to make it stick.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  182. Grow the fuck up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Or at least tell us the whole story. What did you do to invoke his anger?

  183. One thing everyone missed... by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    Just turn up the volume on your own ipod's little speakers. Studies show they will perminantly damage your hearing, then it no longer bothers you!

    -
    I hope this doesn't get modded +Funny . . .

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  184. Good thinking! The Best Way to Get Rid of an Enemy by nietsch · · Score: 1

    Is to make him your friend instead.
    Obviously this will require skills that the subject does not posess, but you might give it a shot. Get to know his name, and greet him with his name every time you see him. Smile happily at him even if he gives you a dirty look. If he does not know your name, politely introduce yourself to him. Just make sure he recognises you as 'Johnny from number 18', not as another faceless youth he can direct his anger to. Once you have built up some credit with him, use that credit to point out to him that his device (that he probably forgot anyway) is really causing you discomfort. He will probably turn it off without hesitation.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  185. We don't live in a perfect world by Peaker · · Score: 1

    So sometimes, another "wrong" is the "right" solution.

    1. Re:We don't live in a perfect world by AdamWeeden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only if you have the attitude that "If perfection can not be achieved we shouldn't bother striving for it." Another wrong only leads us further away from a peaceful society towards the vigilante style societies of our past. By your model if I consider what your posting as "wrong," I have the right to seek vengence to "right" it. Only by treating others how we WISH to be treated, and not by how they treat us first, is our society going to advance. Will we ever achieve 100% of people doing it? No, but that doesn't mean that it's a dumb thing to do.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    2. Re:We don't live in a perfect world by minion · · Score: 1

      Only if you have the attitude that "If perfection can not be achieved we shouldn't bother striving for it." Another wrong only leads us further away from a peaceful society towards the vigilante style societies of our past. By your model if I consider what your posting as "wrong," I have the right to seek vengence to "right" it. Only by treating others how we WISH to be treated, and not by how they treat us first, is our society going to advance. Will we ever achieve 100% of people doing it? No, but that doesn't mean that it's a dumb thing to do.
       
      Very fine words, and an admirable solution to the problem. But, you're fogetting that the poster is doing war with a grumpy old man. They give no quarter! Compromise is not something anyone that age understands!

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
    3. Re:We don't live in a perfect world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Only by treating others how we WISH to be treated, and not by how they treat us first, is our society going to advance".

      Ah, yes, the golden rule. But what if I don't want to be treated the way you want to be treated? What if the way you want to be treated thoroughly offends me, and would greatly insult me?

      Enter the PLATINUM rule: Treat others as THEY wish to be treated. THAT would make them happy. Be aware not everyone thinks the way you do. I LOVE BLTs, but I think a Muslim would be thoroughly offended if I offered them one, and rightfully so.

      Again, to be in the right, treat others as THEY want to be treated.

    4. Re:We don't live in a perfect world by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      easy way to fix that kind of thing is to give a known muslim a CLT (chicken lettuce tomato)
      a good host will find ways to accomodate guests

      have a salad table
      nonkosher meats table
      kosher meats table

      and then your desserts/ drinks table(s) (in soft and hard)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    5. Re:We don't live in a perfect world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it "wrong" to disable this guy's device if it's causing annoyance to the entire community? Simply disabling the device would be using justifiable means to a justifiable end, IMHO, and no escalation is involved. It's like defending your face with your palms as opposed to punching back. See what he does next. Disable that. And iterate. Just make him impotent without harming him. There is nothing immoral in that at all.

      In fact it may be less immoral than calling the police - that, after all, is just an attempt to bring down retribution by remote control. If retribution is what you wish to avoid, then go no further than disabling his efforts.

    6. Re:We don't live in a perfect world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...I think you missed the point.

  186. Muriatic Acid by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    Used for etching and decorating concrete, available at most "home improvement" stores.

    Get some, get some GLOVES and a plastic brush.

    Some night apply same in a nice pattern on the cement curb in front of his house, like a sign. Write "ASSHOLE LIVES HERE" or something similar. (Or "FREE HOOKERS AND BLOW")

    Him painting the curb would probably be illegal, call the cops on him when he does that. Same with removing it or applying more acid.

  187. I hate dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate dogs. Seriously. They're miserble, smelly, loud, stupid creatures that do things like eat shit. Sorta like your mom. WHA-TAAAH!!

  188. Misuse of Mosquito Noise Device as Weapon by infiniphonic · · Score: 1

    Secretly causing a "forced malfunction" is probably the best solution.

    --
    Crisis is the rule, not the exception.
  189. check your laws by JW.Axelsen.Sr. · · Score: 1

    i dunno about where you live, but in my state (CO) community (there're pretty strict rules here that define what a community is and where its borders are, ask a cop if you have anything like that going on where you live) rule usually goes. if some old duffer was doing stuff like this, all we'd have to do is get the neighbors together, have everyone sign a letter to the city, send it to the police chief and the the mayor, or present it at a city council meeting. then the dude would be presented with a few options by a police officer, those options being the guy takes the mosquito-noisemaker down or the cop does. of course, all of these actions could be preempted by a well-aimed (and frozen, if you're dealing with a metal target) potato gun round.

  190. Fight fire by Excelsior · · Score: 1

    A text-to-speech playback of this Ask Slashdot on a loudspeaker would drive neighbors young and old to another Zip code.

  191. You missed the whole point to my post. by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Users of said device, as I understand it, just want teens/kids to stay away from Their porches/storefronts. The range of the device is just enough so they'll hang around in other venue. Now, when a group of kids is in YOUR porch, or in YOUR driveway just "hanging out", they are normally loud. I know, when my 7yo was a newborn I used to get in my driveway and say to a bunch of kids "please, get out of here, you are being noisy and will wake up the baby", every saturday. And they kept coming back. So, (minus the part where [a] besides being 35, the mosquito noise annoys me too and [b] it would certainly wake up the baby) a device like that would be nice to keep them out.
    That is why I am saying: if your neighbour has one of those, just hang out in your home or anywhere NOT his porch/yard. Because that's the range the device usually has. It's NOT anyone's right to make noises in front of my house (down here, it's a felony called "disturbance of peace"), despite of the time of the day.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:You missed the whole point to my post. by Invidious · · Score: 1

      So it's his right to disturb the peace 24/7? Here's a hint -- sounds carry.

    2. Re:You missed the whole point to my post. by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      If the sound didn't carry, and this was only being used on private property, then you'd have a point. But the fact is that you can't contain sound like that. Do you really think you could play rock music loud enough to consistantly drive old people off your property and still not disturb the ones that live right next to you? And keep in mind that high-frequency hearing is lost gradually, if it's annoying enough to get most of the loud ones off the lawn 10 feet away, it's annoying enough to push some of the quiet ones off the sidewalk 15 feet away.

      I'm sorry you had problems with kids, but they still deserve the same right not to be harassed that the rest of us enjoy.

  192. Just disable the damn thing by DeltaHat · · Score: 1, Redundant

    All this talk about EMP guns and escalating hostilities makes no sense. Just pull it off the wall one night and snip one of the speaker wires. Put it back and he'll never know. If he is too old to hear the thing himself, he is too old to hear if it stops working!

  193. ObSimpsons by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Funny
    Only problem is you are now left with a bigger monster then what you started out with
    No problem! When winter rolls around, the gorillas simply freeze to death.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  194. High Frequency Misery by Malkin · · Score: 1

    Trust me, I feel your pain, man. I was working one place where my CRT was going bad, and making a high pitched squealing noise. I told our IT guy, and he said he couldn't hear anything. I told him to get the damn monitor away from me. So, the next day, I came into work, and I had a new monitor, but I could still hear that high pitched squealing noise... coming from BEHIND me. He apparently thought I was crazy, so he had solved the problem in the laziest way he could -- by swapping my monitor with the one in the cubicle behind mine. I walked over to his desk, told him to follow me, and then I pointed out the offending monitor. He was in shock. I was like, "Yes, I CAN hear it, and no, I'm NOT crazy, and for the last time, WOULD YOU GET THAT THING AWAY FROM ME?"

  195. Send a letter threatening legal action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send the old bastard a letter threatening legal action, and demand suitable compensation for the period of harassment. It is easy to demonstrate the level of noise of different frequency components using a computer and microphone. Take screenshots of a simple oscilloscope type output, and send copies to the old bastard. If this fails, you have the evidence you need for legal action for harassment.
    Parasites that harass others in this way rank among the worst kinds of scum on that planet. I am sure you can make the old bastard pay. Sign him up to every mailing list in the country (eg. gay publications, womens clothes catalogues, ...)

  196. Mosquito ringtone as WAV file by jetcityorange · · Score: 1

    For those of you curious about the so-called Mosquito Ringtone a.k.a. teen buzz a sample as a WAV file is available online: http://www.jetcityorange.com/MosquitoRingtone.html I can' hear it and I'm 54. My kids can, and laugh at me. For completely different reasons I suspect.

  197. Three words... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    High powered rifle.

    Make sure the trajectory can't be followed back to your house; and use a big enough, expanding round that he will question whether or not to even call the cops.

    When asshats like this win, we all lose

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  198. Great idea! by AmazingRuss · · Score: 2, Funny

    Go on over to his house, ring the bell, and when he answers, give him your friendliest smile, then cockpunch him.

    The population is too large to limit yourself to peaceful solutions. Do what you feel!

  199. Slashdot his website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that'll teach him a lesson!

  200. I use my ears by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    genetically well endowed? what the hell do you use to listen with?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:I use my ears by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Listen? All I know is that making tea is much easier when you have a pair.

  201. Get them to use a wide-band sound level meter by belmolis · · Score: 1

    Whoever enforces the ordinances against excess noise in your community, which is often not the police, should have a sound-level meter. When there's a problem with noise from industry or roads, they don't just send somebody to listen and say "yes, it's too loud" - they measure the sound level. Since lower frequency sounds tend to be the problem, many sound-level meters only go up to 8KHz or 12.5 KHz, but some models go up to 20KHz. A measurement with such a wide-band sound level meter should do the trick.

  202. You can always... by FluffyArmada · · Score: 1

    break it; in an unobvious way... the young people will notice it's broken, but the old dude will have no idea

    --
    If con is the opposite of pro. Then isn't congress the opposite of progress?
  203. read your local zoning laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many noise pollution / zoning ordinances specify decibel levels at certain periods of time, not frequencies or amplitudes. If you could show that the noise was above a certain volume even at an inaudible frequency or at a frequency that was audible to some but not all, then you've caught him violating the ordinance. You just need a decible meter that'll measure those frequencies.

  204. wikipedia listing by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    Demonstrated infrasonic weapon
    The U.S. DOD has demonstrated phased arrays of infrasonic emitters. The weapon usually consists of a device that generates sound at about 7 Hz. The output from the device is routed (by pipes) to an array of open emitters, which are usually one wavelength apart. At this frequency, armor and concrete walls and other common building materials vibrate, and therefore provide no defense. The frequency is chosen to be near the resonant frequency of internal organs, causing illness, deafness, and internal injuries.[citation needed] The resulting weapon is the size of a truck, fragile, and has a shorter range than missiles or artillery shells.[citation needed]

    As a defense to such a weapon, mechanical "diode walls" to convert the oscillating air into a steady flow have been demonstrated. Although not common at this time, they could be mass-produced and would provide an effective countermeasure.[citation needed]

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:wikipedia listing by jamesh · · Score: 1

      According to the context sensitive help in the DOS version of Borland C++, 7Hz is also the resonant frequency of a chickens skull.

      http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=107350 3

    2. Re:wikipedia listing by mpe · · Score: 1

      Demonstrated infrasonic weapon
      The U.S. DOD has demonstrated phased arrays of infrasonic emitters. The weapon usually consists of a device that generates sound at about 7 Hz. The output from the device is routed (by pipes) to an array of open emitters, which are usually one wavelength apart. At this frequency, armor and concrete walls and other common building materials vibrate, and therefore provide no defense. The frequency is chosen to be near the resonant frequency of internal organs, causing illness, deafness, and internal injuries.[citation needed] The resulting weapon is the size of a truck, fragile, and has a shorter range than missiles or artillery shells.[citation needed]


      A fragile device with a short range is hardly the most practical of weapons.

      As a defense to such a weapon, mechanical "diode walls" to convert the oscillating air into a steady flow have been demonstrated. Although not common at this time, they could be mass-produced and would provide an effective countermeasure.[citation needed]

      The only need to be good enough to allow someone to sucessfully aim and fire an anti-tank weapon.

  205. Neighborhood Nuclear Superiority by neonfrog · · Score: 1

    Get out the mini trebouchet and carpet bomb the hell out of him

    Screw that!

    --

    I'm thinking about it, therefore I might be.

  206. Re:Scotch tape ? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    WTF? Are you on another website or something? This is slashdot.

    Use duct tape.

    If that fails, WD-40.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  207. None of the above. by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

    I really doubt it is that one sided. Normally it takes alot to drive an old man to retaliate. HE might have been hearing something that YOU haven't been hearing, and that HE couldn't flag to the cops.

    Perhaps you can prevail upon him to show you mercy with the following advice from the Bible:

    Make peace with him as soon as you can.
    Love your neighbor as yourself.
    Do not resist evil.
    Do not retaliate.
    Always forgive.
    Bless your enemy.
    Pray for your enemy.
    If your neighbor sues you with the law, yield to him.

    Meanwhile, don't be a hypocrite. That means you also keep the advice yourself. To be sure of that, figure out how to stop bugging him, or ask the young offenders to stop bugging him.

    I must admit that my sympathy goes out to the old man, since my OWN neighborhood has been plagued by a bunch of offensive juveniles, who, for some time now, have taken perverse advantage of my goodwill, shouting profanity, taking the LORD's name in vain, and shouting jockspeak from a basketball court just in front of my house. They ingnored and sometimes threatened ME, and meanwhile I've had alot of trouble conveying to the police just how disturbing their noise has been. It seems that I've been in your shoes, but reversed.

    I played basketball at their age, but it didn't turn me into a terrorizor.

    Just curious, have you tried earplugs?

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
    1. Re:None of the above. by falsified · · Score: 1

      I think you know a much different breed of old man than I do. I lived around several older couples when I was growing up. One was convinced that my dog was tearing up his garden. Enough to call the police unprovoked. (As far as I know, though, dogs don't particularly care for vegetables. Oh, and I didn't have a dog.)

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    2. Re:None of the above. by lucerin · · Score: 1
      dude, im a christian too, but you're an idiot

      Do not resist evil.

      what the hell is this?
    3. Re:None of the above. by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

      From Matthew 5, King James version. Pay special attention to verse 39.

        38Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
        39But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
        40And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.
        41And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
        42Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
        43Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
        44But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
        45That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
        46For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?
        47And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?
        48Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

      http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=47&ch apter=5&version=9

      --
      "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
    4. Re:None of the above. by lucerin · · Score: 1

      that doesnt mean you should let someone walk all over you, and torment you with potentially harmful devices
      stand up for yourself damnit!
      christ even physically attacked people who were shitting on him and his, look what he did at the temple with the moneylenders

    5. Re:None of the above. by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

      Christ said in unmistakable terms that people are not supposed to retaliate for anything. The instruction to "turn the other cheek" is very clear. Whether you can carry through on that is a different matter.

      Regarding your example, Christ didn't hurt those people, and he wasn't defending himself, either.

      For clear reasons, Jesus didn't want the moneychangers making money off the temple, the LORD's house, so he kicked their tables over and told them to get out of his Father's house.

      --
      "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
    6. Re:None of the above. by bnenning · · Score: 1

      If your neighbor sues you with the law, yield to him.

      Um, ok. What is the proper Biblical response to SCO?

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    7. Re:None of the above. by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

      Matthew 5:40

      Never resist lawsuits. If somebody sues you, yield and give them MORE than they asked for. It IS the answer Jesus advocated.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=193203&thresho ld=0&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=15853538#158539 15

      --
      "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
    8. Re:None of the above. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let's get this straight - I bring any old bogus lawsuit against you and you immediately give me everything I want and more?
      OK, I believe you're living on land stolen from my ancestors and with no proof whatsoever I demand the deeds to your house. I am instructing my lawyer. Please fold immediately and reply to this posting with the address where I can collect the deeds.
      Please include title to all goods in the house as compensation for the rent your should have paid me.

    9. Re:None of the above. by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

      In this case, I would be genuinely surprised if most Christians would actually follow through with Christ's instruction.

      If I were TRYING to follow it, the deed would have to be made out to Anonymous Coward, you'd have to sue me without knowing my real name, and if you did a background check you'd find that I don't own any land; nor do I hold the deed to any house. That would make it clear you were filing a bogus lawsuit, and committing perjury on top of that. Perjury is a serious crime.

      More to the point, if you'd swindle Christian(s) out of their homes based on their religious faith, you ought to consider the fact that eventually you'll have to face GOD.

      Specifically, there is a commandment that says "thou shalt not steal", and another that says "thou shalt not bear false witniss against thy neighbor". Christ instructed us to keep the 10 Commandments. Salvation is predecated upon repentance. Christ did not appear on earth in order to make the world an easier place to be a crook.

      Eventually God judges us.

      But if you think you'd be forgiven for swindling people out of their homes then you must agree that they'd definitely be forgiven for declining to honor your bogus lawsuit.

      --
      "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
  208. Screw that... get a lawyer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and sue the holy crap out of both the old man, and the makers of the Mosquito device since they probably have the deepest pockets.

  209. Sound Cancellation by Viv · · Score: 1

    If you want what should be a legal method of dealing with this, make a sound cancellation device.

    To make one, you basically need a microphone, a bandpass filter in the frequencies he's emitting, an op amp that is set up to shift the input 180 degrees (negative unity gain), and a speaker. If you're the kind of person who knows a little about electronics, it shouldn't even be too hard or expensive.

    If you station a few of these around his house, you might be able to cancel out the vast majority of the noise. The key will be to try to put these as close to directly between the listener and the noise maker as possible.

  210. inverse wave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    record the sound to get the frequency and then generate an inverse wave of the same frequency. that should cancel out the annoying noise.

  211. Countermeasure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They used to use infrasound in cinemas to vibrate people's colons and make them more nervous. Perhaps there's a subsonic tone that has no effect on the young, but makes the old shit themselves?

  212. I suggest: by Angostura · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You modify your day-to-day activities somewhat - explain to him that you aren't trying to harass him., and ask him politely to turn the device off since you find it unpleasant.

    I mean, you have tried to come to a reasonable accommodation, right?

  213. A few ideas by mikegroovy · · Score: 1

    That has got to be torture. Seems like a device an evil overlord would use to torture his enemies (and minions)
    Change the pitch so that it is lower. (that way he can hear it too)
    Get two ultrasonic speakers and position them so their interference patern is right at his front door. (Might take having a neighboor help.) Make it play sounds of doorbells ringing. Or wire his doorbell to a remote so you can make it ring. Often.
    Or like others have suggested, disable the evil device in a manner that that is not noticible.
    Wrap his house too (in TP.) Egg his car. Sue him for damages to your mental well being. Blame everything bad that you do on temporary insanity.
    Just take a baseball bat to it, or get a neighborhood kid to do it. (Think "Office Space.") Those things aren't cheap. Maybe he won't replace it.
    You could pettition the neighbors to have it removed. Call the police everyday. Have your neighbors call the police everyday. Have your neighbors gather around to tell the police that they hear it too. Have your neighbors gather around his home with shovels, pitchforks, and torches etc. Tell him that he is being banashed from your neighborhood.
    Write the local newspaper\radio\TV stations tell them your story. Tell them how the badguy makes babies cry. Get them to mention the badguy's name.
    Send him brochures for local retirement homes. Give his phone number to a few of them so they can call him often.

  214. auto-fightback by samjam · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get a mosquito sensor, to detect when it is turned on, use it to power a 12Khz sounder focussed at his windows.

    When he turns of the mosquito noise, the noise he can hear will go off.

    When he turns it on again, he will hear it.

    He will think it has gone wrong; and you know he feels the same pain you do.

    Sam

  215. Elevate it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Fine. He wants to do that, good for him.

    You can blast him with a moderate-powered laser right in the eyes when he goes out to water his lawn. See how much the fucker likes that.

  216. Re:right back at them -- I WANT one by Doug+Coulter · · Score: 1

    Wow. I'd seen another attempt at this kind of thing in the past. It used a constant blower and a butterfly valve. When the valve was in "neutral" air just recirculated between the blower's input and output, but shifting the valve to either side caused air to move in and out of two other pipes, the far ends of which were to be spaced out on either side of a stadium stage. Same physics, more or less. I might try to make one of these...

  217. Good Lord! by msimm · · Score: 1

    Hasn't anyone ever heard of a bb gun? If this thing is as much a nuisance as the poster suggests it is this should be a walk in the park. Don't do it yourself, but if all of the kids in your neighborhood are too lazy to figure it out themselves 'gently' point one of them in the right direction.

    I'm not *that* old and I remember the bb gun being as much a destructive tool as a toy.

    Its just a matter of finding the right too for the task. He's a pensioner, how many of those damn things do you think he's going to buy?

    He's hitting you with kid-gloves and you need to 'ask slashdot'? :) What, you want like an invisibility cloak or someone to send you the schematics for a high powered noise canceling device?

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Good Lord! by Bruzer · · Score: 1
      ...
      He's hitting you with kid-gloves and you need to 'ask slashdot'? :) What, you want like an invisibility cloak or someone to send you the schematics for a high powered noise canceling device?


      Yeah! How can you expect it to be like all those other slashdot articles that posters take the time to write up schematics?

      Seriously when was the last time you read something detailed and helpful from posters here? It is more often lengthy rants, harsh criticism, or cut-and-paste from web sites.
      --
      "Tempt not a desperate man" - Willy S.
  218. Not all of them, just Hezbollah, Hamas, and Likud by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    -n/t-

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  219. Easy Solution by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    As the Mosquito emits a sound that's well out of his hearing range, he can't hear it, while most of the rest of the neighborhood is under 40 and can; at which point it's causing everyone a great deal of discomfort.

    Oh just grow up!

  220. Fix the problem without him knowing by _LMark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If he can't hear it, I think the easy fix is to wait until he is gone, then replace the batteries with dead ones, snip the power cord someplace where it won't be immediately obvious, or disable the device in some other way. Since he can't hear it, he'll just assume that it's working and no escalation is necessary.

    --
    'the Internet is right.'
    1. Re:Fix the problem without him knowing by Millenniumman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He'll probably figure out eventually (when people nearby aren't cringing). Plus, you shouldn't violate his property in such a way, unless absolutely necessary. And, he is still being a jerk. The best way to fix it would be for one of his neighbors to get one that operates a wavelength he can hear, or, if you must, alter his such that it makes a noise he can hear.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    2. Re:Fix the problem without him knowing by moankey · · Score: 1

      You say that putting dead batteries or cutting a cord is violating his property, yet go on to say physically altering the device is a good solution. Isnt altering the device the same as violating his property?
      Seems the dead battery theory is the minimal of all intrusions to his property.

  221. Break it! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Just try and open it up carefully and cut a wire. He'll never know!!

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  222. Simple Solution by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Just listen to really loud rock music and damage *your own hearing* so that you don't hear the high pitches anymore.

  223. Zoning Laws by lowvato · · Score: 1

    This is just a guess but maybe there are zoning laws the affect the use of such a device. Do you live in an area with a homeowners association, maybe they can help. Also, if one of your neighbors have young kids the cops would be more understanding if some perants told them that the mosquito is driving their children into neurosis.

  224. Here are some real steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, do not take the law into your own hands. Your options have not been exhausted yet. Call the police, and keep on them, explain to them the delicate nature of the problem. It's a noise problem, but it is only one where young people aged 24 and below it can hear it. Explain to them that its a device that emits a high frequency pitch at high volume, and that it has been on constantly.

    I think you should be diligent about it for at least two weeks with the police. If that does not work there is a plan b.

    Inform your neighbor with a written note, explain the situation in careful detail and be as polite about it as possible. Make two copies, one for yourself, and another for your neighbor. If you can get a written signature from your neighbor that he recieved the note, that would be perfect. Otherwise I think something through the post office, fed ex, or ups where they can give you a receipt that documents the delivery, that would be a good substitute. Do not under any circumstance give him more information than he needs, you have to be discreet about this. Only give him the note under the pretense that your are annoyed by the sounds, and simply nothing more.

    Get a hearing test, to gauge the level of hearing you have. Its obvious that you have decent hearing if the noise bothers you so much, but you need a record on paper that indicates your hearing ability.

    Print the page off the manufacture's website, this is admissable evidence. Get a sound meter, and film yourself using it, make sure that the gauge is clear and readable on the screen.

    Next step is to file a small claims court lawsuit against your neighbor, get some character witnesses(preferably adults) who knows the neighbor as annoying. I don't know what kind of claim you can make as far as damages go, but perhaps you could sue him for the cost of the device.

    So there you have it, you can explain to the judge how the police didn't cooperate even after two weeks of informing them, then you drop evidence one by one starting with the device description, the hearing test, the witnesses, and of course a copy of the letter you gave the neighbor.

  225. Agism by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    It's the new bigotry. If someone isn't a member of your "group" it's fair game to be hateful towards them. All "political" correctness has done is redefine the "group". Look at the group a college student hangs out with, and it contains other races, other genders, other sexual preferences. But it doesn't contain the elderly, so it's okay to rag on them, call them "old goat", call the police on them, etc.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    1. Re:Agism by noamsml · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Similarly, since you don't know any young people, it's obviously OK to blast them with borderline-ultrasonic sound *rolls eyes*.

  226. Or you could . . . by TSAG · · Score: 1

    slashdot his tires?

    sorry . . . had to be said.

    --
    "If you're not having fun right now, you're wasting your time."
  227. Just Post His Address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just post his address and some of us will come over and take care of things ourselves, ya pansy.

  228. Half speed by paylett · · Score: 1

    Record it and play it back to them at half-speed.
    (Or find a non-tech solution: like a younger police officer)

    --

    Believing something doesn't make it true. Not believing something doesn't make it false.

  229. How to prove it: by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    First, you get copies of the papers that talk about the "Mosquito" noise.
    Second, you get a microphone and an oscilloscope. You can show the signal on generated on the o-scope.
    Third, get a frequency shifter. You can drop the frequency down to something audible.
    Forth, Record the sound.
    Fifth, go to the police and/or D.A. and do a little demo. Convince them to see it live in the neighborhood.

    And you people call yourselves techies, geeks, and hackers.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  230. is the device 100% waterproof? by toy4two · · Score: 1

    Why not just spray the hose on it. Better yet, mix up some salt water in a bucket, and dump the bucket on it, try to get it inside nice and good. It should start to rust and fail pretty quickly, the old man won't know any better. Get out the toilet paper, bb guns, and paintball guns and go to town with your teenage friends, what happened the the misguided youth of past generations?

  231. Very Simple by noamsml · · Score: 1

    Report the guy to the police as a public nuisance. (If you don't want to go there, you cn just wake him up at 5 AM to the noise of your newly bought Shofar, and claim that you're Jewish and are practicing for Rosh Hashana)

  232. Where's Scott Baio!? by sarge+apone · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Compassion for the needs of others and a desire to do right will however often win out.

    What is this? An ABC After-School special?!

    1. Re:Where's Scott Baio!? by numbski · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. Just my attitude on life. :P

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  233. damn it, I downloaded that MP3, and my dog started going nuts!

  234. Try Using a Sound Level Meter by OmniGeek · · Score: 1

    If you want an effective way to get the police involved that does NOT include having them put handcuffs on you (as many of the suggestions I see posted here could do), try using a sound level meter to document the sound intensity of the offending device. For extra credit, get an audiologist to help with the documentation of the nuisance. With that evidence, you stand a better chance of convincing the police that the annoying noise they cannot hear is real, and really is an objective nuisance that need to be addressed.

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  235. Get a younger cop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has it become that hard to find a cop under 40? :P

    1. Re:Get a younger cop? by chawly · · Score: 1

      Under 40 and not deaf to the protests of the "civilians around him ? Yes, I think it has become hard to find such a specimen.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  236. the needs of the many ... but who's that by pbhj · · Score: 1

    So, it's ok to destroy the device 'cause it's pissing you off?

    Well, perhaps, and this isn't a very long shot, it's there because these dudes are harassing the guy. Perhaps they harass half the neighbourhood. In which case the "many" would probably support the dissuasion of this group of youths from their usual activities.

    Be nice to the guy. Get together with a recognisable community worker and some friends and paint his fence or fix up his garden. You can't disarm such a situation by escalation of "violence".

    ---

    You need to use a modal logic.

    1. Re:the needs of the many ... but who's that by drsquare · · Score: 1
      So, it's ok to destroy the device 'cause it's pissing you off?
      Yes. If someone installs and operates a device, the whole purpose of which is to cause me annoyance and misery, then I have every right to destroy it. That old cunt has no right to do what he's doing.

      You can't disarm such a situation by escalation of "violence".
      You only have to read the stories of old people battered and hospitalised to realise how wrong your comment really is. Do you think that if he was jumped on the way home from bingo he'd carry on with that device? No, he'd probably move.
  237. Mod Parent UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sir, I find your ideas intriguing and wish to subscribe to your newsletter. :-)

  238. presumably the marijuana has nothing to do with it by pbhj · · Score: 1

    Just googling amicold and he appears to like the weed, PSP and Xbox [could be another amicold!]

    So, I'm guessing he's dealing outside this guys house and has a penchant for violent disorder and lawlessness.

    Perhaps he's been trying out what he learnt on GTA too?

  239. Parinoid Neighbors by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
    Recently, he installed a Mosquito ultrasonic noise device as an apparent attempt to 'get back at us' for our harassment. ... Unfortunately, because the police also can't hear it, we can't get the authorities to do anything about it, leaving us empty-handed in our attempts at getting some peace and quiet back.


    Yeah. Well, at least you've figured out that he's really the one who is paranoid. Silly old man who's plotting against you, using devices the police can't hear... Thankfully, he's the only paranoid one here...

    --
    Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
  240. Purple Martins by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Talk to the guy and tell him his device is hurting your ears. Offer to help him put up a birdhouse for purple martins. Looking out for the birds should keep him busy and out of everyones hair.

    If that doesn't work, a box of 1000 crickets cost about $10. Sneak a few thousand crickets in his flowerbeds and then tell him you read those electric mosquito repellers attract crickets. Crickets can be a little noisy and he might turn off his device hoping the other bugs go away.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  241. Call the police again by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

    If the device is violating noise bylaws, the police have an obligation to do something about it. If the cops insist on doing nothing, it's out of pure laziness. Call Internal Affairs. If that doesn't work, get together with your other neighbours, hire a lawyer, and sue the neighbour and the police department.

  242. noise fix by ralph1 · · Score: 0

    Eletric G and marshal stack should fix the problem.

  243. Re:Ask Slashdot? - Civil Lawsuit by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    This needs to be modded up, its the only informative response that i've seen on this topic.

  244. Good call by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I am definitely going to try that tomorrow (or the soonest I have a spare toilet-paper / paper-towel tube available). What was getting to me about the sound is that it's not constant; it changes in pitch and amplitude from time to time, so I thought it was related to the HD or video card, but couldn't ever relate it to the use of either component. (It wasn't as obvious as my Windows laptop, which emits a strange sound from the video chipset whenever you scroll a window, for instance.)

    Since I had been using this machine as a server and leaving it on all the time, it's been a real pain to have it turned off because of the annoyance of leaving it on. If your suggestion works, it will have saved me the purchase of a new server.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Good call by mikefe · · Score: 1
      (It wasn't as obvious as my Windows laptop, which emits a strange sound from the video chipset whenever you scroll a window, for instance.)


      How do you fix this if you can hear the CPU also? For a while I thought it was the fan changing speed because of the change in temperature and increased/reduced friction, but for the longest time I can actually hear when a CPU is pegged at 100% when compared to idle.
      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  245. what's a compander? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Companding

    "This is effectively a form of lossy audio data compression."

    A-law and mu-law are both non-linear 8-bit representations of audio samples. They are generally considered to compress because they provide the same dynamic range as a 16-bit representation but use save space. But the intention of a-law and u-law is to represent the original signal as accurately as possible.

    And no, u-law and a-law aren't used to improve the dynamic range of the signal, they are used to preserve it (and as much detail as possible) while using as little digital bandwidth as possible.

    A system could be devised that used linear 8-bit samples instead of a-law or u-law, and it would also preserve the dynamic range of the sound, it just wouldn't preserve as much detail in low sounds. A logarithmic representation like a-law or u-law preserves dynamic range and still can represent signals with small dynamic range fairly well.

    In short, an a-law or u-law encoding is used to get as much of the fidelity of a 16-bit linear system as possible in the bandwidth of an 8-bit system. It's thus a compression scheme.

    It is not a system for improving dynamic range nor a system that is dependent on the frequency ranges of a human voice.

    If you're gonna be pedantic about what others say, try to get your own stuff impeachably correct first.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  246. ooh crap.. by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    unimpeachably correct I mean.

    silly me.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  247. duh by oneplus999 · · Score: 1

    if u disable it, he will never know. go over there one night, and break it, just not so its visibly noticeable.

  248. MOD PARENT USEFUL by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't even need to find somebody with a seeing eye dog. There are whole organizations that ENJOY getting establishments fined for having a bathroom stall less than an inch too small (plus cost of renovation), or a counter a few inches too high. Whether the establisment has handicaped patrons or not is irelavent to them. You just need to find one of these groups and notify them. They might take a little convicing, but they will do all of the work for you on this front. This is probably the most heavy handed approach you can take (short of breaking the law).

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  249. Just smash it. by Tomfrh · · Score: 1

    Seriously, just smash the thing.

  250. Forgot something... by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    Old jerks care less than young jerks. Young jerks will push the limits, but don't want to get in trouble. Old jerks already know what they can get away with. Additionally, they can get away with more, because they are old.

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  251. OK, I've tested it by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    I can hear it perfectly clearly through my PC speakers - these are actually fairly large monitors because I do a lot of audio work. They are pretty good speakers, so I'd expect them to reproduce pretty high frequencies.
    Listening to the noise, it sounds like about a 14kHz tone modulated with a faint 3kHz tone. A quick poke about in Audacity seems to bear this out.

    To be entirely fair, I used the downloaded ringtone *and* a file generated from audacity containing *only* the 14kHz tone.
    Both were encoded at 192kbps. I copied them to a memory card and put it into my Nokia 6230i.

    Playing back through the phone's internal speaker, neither were audible, either using my own ears or a rather expensive borrowed Neumann U87 and an oscilloscope. Through a wired headset (came with the phone) they were *just* audible.

    I suspect the phone may be doing some downsampling because other test mp3s sound a bit different through it, with the high end a bit smeared. I didn't have another mp3-capable phone of a different make handy to test with, and I suspect that all Nokias would use similar decoding software.

  252. Maybe he just hates mosquitos? by nilbog · · Score: 1

    Build one of these: http://www.diyhappy.com/quick-and-dirty-mosquito-t rap/
    Give it to him as a gift an explain it's benefits over the annoying sound-box (i.e. you won't shoot him).

    --
    or else!
  253. You conveniently missed... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    the post where I said that although I can hear the thing, and find it annoying, it's not physically painful really unless you stay 10min+ listening to it in a headset.

    But, to be factual and just about your post, after I read it, I tested it here at home with me (35), my wife (34), the maid (30+), by brother-in-law and his wife (33, 29), my mom and my mother-in-law (50+, does not hear it), my son (7), all cranking up my speakers (as the real device would be). Every one of us (that can hear it -- including my son) just find it annoying, and would be annoyed to be in the next porch if this was turned on in an old geezer's porch, but it would not hurt us (I didn't tell the others what that was about so I could get blind results). IMHO, people who said the noise was painful were being overly dramatical. And I tested (my powered 15W RMS speakers to the max) and determined that ONE thin wall is enough to block que sound completely.

    IN OTHER WORDS: all the tests I conducted lead to the following results:
    1. The sound is annoying as hell to anyone that can hear it, but NOT physically harming or painful.
    2. 35 year olds _can_ hear it.
    3. 50 year olds can _not_ hear it.
    4. MAIN CONCLUSION: if the old geezer is your next-door street neighbour and you live in houses that share a wall, it would be annoying to hang around your porch, too. Don't do that. Especially because hanging with your buddies in your porch certainly is noisy and annoying to him, too -- that's why he installed it to begin with. Just go inside and the noise will go away. No, you don't have the right to hang on your own porch if you are being noisy and annoying to your neighbours. That's it.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  254. My cats can hear it by kingsqueak · · Score: 1

    I downloaded the mp3, can't hear a thing thanks to years working as a soundman in clubs. Playing it over and over, turning my head, nothing.

    Then I look over and notice all three of my cats huddled at the top of my stairwell all looking rather annoyed. Evidently there is something in that file.

  255. No trouble hearing it... by Explo · · Score: 1

    I could hear the sound quite easily with my headphones and I'm turning 34 next week.

    --
    Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.
  256. Pricey ... But Worth It !!! by bareshiyth · · Score: 1

    Ordered mine already!

  257. superposition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know you could get really crafty and try to cancel out the soundwaves by using principles of physics and the superposition principle. this might be difficult, and a bit hightech but it has a potential to work.

  258. Problem might be with you by algoa456 · · Score: 0

    You may have tinnitis - ringing in the ears - from all the loud pop concerts and iPod sessions.... and you are just blaming the poor innocent neighbor

  259. Oneword by wamatt · · Score: 1

    Freeholding

    As soon as I can afford the above I will be moving. Well said, there is an old lady in our block of flats that does nothing all day but find fault in everything. Bitter old people should be removed from society. Yes getting old sucks - deal with it don't make our lives a misery.

    She we should all be able to "get along" but to some people, that means unrelentingly getting everyone to conform to their lifestyle, or move out.

  260. Legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For someone with your nick you should take a look at this charming info from wikipedia.

    Legality

    As incendiary devices, Molotov cocktails are illegal to manufacture or possess in many regions. Their use against people is typically covered under a variety of charges, including assault, actual or grievous bodily harm, manslaughter, attempted murder, and murder, depending upon their effect and upon local laws. Their use against property is usually covered under arson charges. In the United States, Molotov cocktails are considered "destructive devices" and regulated by the ATF.

  261. Day to Day activites by gnomes · · Score: 1

    "believing us to be attempting to harass him in our day-to-day activities." Define day to day activities. Playing music loud enough for anybody to hear outside your yard or yelling and screaming while playing a game is not acceptable behavior. When you get older, your hearing changes. What used to be music and voices is now noise. I don't blame the young. Your parents didn't teach you about being civil, having manners or being considerate to other, regardless of who it might be. You were taught to go out and inflict yourselves on other and that you had a right to do so. Nobody has any rights. All you have is luck and one day that will run out and you will be the old man. Alton The Gnome

  262. A little more detail might be helpful by lpfarris · · Score: 1

    There is precious little detail, to determine what is going on here. Many people in the neighborhood are under 40? From what I've heard, many over 25 have trouble hearing the mosquito (although I am not one of those). If it is a neighborhood problem, and enough neighbors actually complain to the police, it will be hard for them to ignore it, so I have to assume that it is only the poster that has complained. You might be too young to consider that the old man might actually be afraid of young people, and has sought a way that helps keep them more distant from him. I know that young men certainly seem to cultivate an intimidating appearance these days. And why not be fearful? What have you done to invite trust? What have any young people in your neighborhood done to reach out to him? Yes, I know, nasty, boring, paranoid, old codger.... Of course, he is thinking "nasty, loud, obnoxious, inconsiderate kids...." And any of the illegal and vindictive approaches suggested validates his point of view. You think maybe there is a reason he feels paranoid? You might not be the ones that got him this way, but it was probably kids that engendered his paranoia. You reap the benefits of inconsiderate youth before you. And, let's face it, kids that are inconsiderate of others, making their cars shake with their subwoofers, piercing my ears with their ipods cranked up to 90dB, are extremely evident, whether or not they are a minority contingent. In another time, in another place, he would be getting help, respect, attention, from the young people around him, and would be more likely to trust youth. Now, the only people that seem to even sometimes care are their own kids, and there's no guarantee of that, even. Yeah, you didn't make him that way. But how often have you gone out of your way to put an older person at ease, before? If you had, there probably wouldn't be an issue now, because you could just do the same thing again. However, if you can't be bothered to take some time out for a senior, well, is it any wonder seniors are distrustful of youth?

  263. Re:right back at them -- I WANT one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't possibly believe this hoax. It's so obvious!

  264. Thank the man for turning the machine off by IvyMike · · Score: 1

    If Old Man McPhee can't hear it, perfect. Just convince him that the machine burnt out.

    Get a few friends who can stand the noise, hold a party on the porch, and when the old man comes out, thank him profusely for finally turning off that dammed machine. Hopefully he'll try to get his money back, or get a replacement machine. Just wait a few weeks, and repeat. After a few times, he'll be convinced that the thing is unreliable and hopefully just give up.

  265. Destruction? :P by alexandre · · Score: 1

    I think the answer could be called a BB gun ;-)

  266. A more techological solution by pngwen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought I would deviate a bit and offer a more technological solution.

    Let's examine the facts. He can't hear it, and neither can the police. That means you can't prove that it is making a load sound. However, that goes the other way too. He can't prove that it ISN'T making a sound and cannot even notice when it stops working.

    Now, if you were to destroy the box, he would notice. If you stole it, again he would notice. If you pulled the power out, he would still notice because it wouldn't light up any more. Any cirucit disruption would cause the power indicator to not glow.

    So, here is what you do. You get a 50 ohm resistor, and then sneak over there in the dead of the night with a screwdriver and a soldering iron. These devices are made with ultrasonic transducers. An ultrasonic transducer looks like a small can with holes in the top. It may also use speakers, which are readily identifiable. Simply sever the leads to the transducers/speakers and then solder a 50 ohm resistor in the place of each one. Put the device back together and no one knows that you have tampered with it.

    If you do this, all indicator lights that the device has will still work. Every young person will notice the absence of sound, and the older people will be none the wiser. You get your peace back, and he gets to keep his smugness, everyone wins!

    --
    I am the penguin that codes in the night.
  267. Depleted immune system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Young people are able to hear higher frequencies, thus able to hear this really annoying, high-pitched sound. So, use the fact that old people have a depleted immune system, and encourage every young person in the neighborhood with a cold to wipe their noses on their hands, and give him a good friendly, neighborly, handshake.

  268. Just direct the sound better! by browman1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds of this frequency are very easy to block as they're extremely directional.

    If he wants to keep people off his lawn, just stick a cowel over it, so that it directs the sound down. If he has grass on his lawn, that should damp it down enough so that you have to physically be on his lawn to hear it.

    1. Re:Just direct the sound better! by browman1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I wonder what you could do with a parabolic reflector (e.g. break a window or two)?

  269. Ice Cream Truck by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 2, Funny

    The sane response is to borrow an ice cream truck. The noise is universally accepted - it is irritating beyond description, and will attract kids. I think it is the safe and appropriate answer to your problem.

    AIK

    1. Re:Ice Cream Truck by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      An effective strategy unless your neighbor is a pedophile.

  270. WAV version by sych · · Score: 1

    WAV Version: http://www.jetcityorange.com/MosquitoRingtone.html

    I'm 25, and on my system it opens by default with Totem player... and I can only *just* hear it. The MP3 versions I found, however, were very audiable.

    If I open it with GNUSound and play it there, I *can't* hear it. It must be doing something different to what Totem does. I also used GNUSound to generate a 17KHz sine wave, and I can't hear that either.

  271. TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I delivered Newspapers when I was 11 years old
    I knew hwo was home watching TV.
    8-) they were elegible for collection

    I still at the age of 39 3/4 can still hear that freaking annoying high pitched buzz

  272. How about a HERF gun? by Stringfellow · · Score: 2, Interesting
  273. Offtopic: slashdot broken -- missing comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm browsing this thread at -1 (nested). There are 942 posts, but I can see only 674 unique posts. My little slashdot post counter shows:

    Total Posts Displayed: 1149
    Unique Posts: 674
    Duplicate Posts: 475

    Fix the damn dupes and show the missing posts. 4 years after slashdot went from single page per story to multiple pages and this fucking issue has not been fixed.

  274. And Nelson Mandela... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... and many others.

    Geeks are suppossed to be good at spotting patterns.

    This one is screaming at you but your political biases are stopping you to see it.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  275. Non confrontational by tbuskey · · Score: 1

    In college, there was one kid who played his stereo loud alot. When we got fed up with it, we'd call his phone. Riinnng! He'd turn down the stereo, go pick up the phone, and we'd hang up. Usually he didn't turn the stereo back up.

    Quick fix, no confrontation needed.

  276. Where's this world going to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently, he installed a Mosquito ultrasonic noise device as an apparent attempt to 'get back at us' for our harassment.

    Oh, boy. Thank God I live in an underdeveloped country...

  277. step-by-step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) collect poop from all neighborhood dogs and/or residents
    2) surreptitiously remove the device from his house
    3) put all of this together into a large paper bag
    4) you know what to do with the bag
    5) he stomps it out, gets poo on his foot, and, when cleaning it up, finds the device inside and realizes why he has poop on his foot.

  278. Obviously, the thing to do... by jbrannon · · Score: 1

    ... is to cast Silence on the device. Granted, it may only last a day or two, but since you've slept, just cast it again. That should take care of it. ;-)

  279. Propagatin' by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    My physics teacher in high school referred to sound waves propagating. Here is an example. There are 5 million google hits for "propagate sound waves" so maybe it isn't as incorrect as you think. According to Princeton, propagate (travel through the air) "sound and light propagate in this medium" is the 2nd definition.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  280. SOme people missing part of the issue by zorro6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This isn't an "anti-mosquito" device. The device in question is used to disperse loiterers and in general make an area uncomfortable for human beings. It is called a mosquito because it makes a high pitched noise, like a mosquito, that is very annoying and drives people away. It is used outside of 7-11s and the like to keep the riff-raff from hanging around. It has no other purpose except to annoy people. That may make a difference to the answer here but a lot of folks didn't actually read the relevant info (nothing new for /.).

  281. Hop the fence by AaronHorrocks · · Score: 1

    Trespassing eh? Don't you know that's a crime?
    Plus old people have to get up in the middle of the night and pee. Let's say he's in the bathroom, hears a clammer outside (you with your hammer) and then here comes gramps with his shotgun, or rifle, or old service pistol. You're on HIS PROPERTY with a tool that can be used to break-in, and even as a weapon. You're up to NO GOOD. He can legally shoot you. That's not good.

    Why not play it safe and shoot the darned thing from a distance with a high powered BB gun? Least that's what I'd do. My neighbors leave me alone. Darned toot'n!

  282. It's NOT anti-Mosquito! Get your facts right. by Jeff85 · · Score: 1
    an anti-mosquito device passed by the FCC isn't reason to go trapsing onto other people's property to destroy things

    It's not a device to drive mosquitoes away! It's nicknamed "The Mosquito" because the noise is so annoying to those who can hear it and it's specifically designed to annoy younger people. You didn't even look at the link provided in the summary! Of course this is Slashdot, so I shouldn't expect you to.

    http://www.compoundsecurity.co.uk/teenage_control_ products.html
    --
    Fetch Text URL - Firefox Extension
  283. Incomplete Story by happyDave · · Score: 1

    I don't see the part where the poster says, "I went over to his house to discuss these things, and he wouldn't talk to me at all." Have you tried...talking? Trying to work out problems like an adult, rather than running to mommy Slashdot?

  284. Judging by the "talk to him responses".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging by the "Just go talk to him" responses, quite a few of the posters have never had to deal with racism. Some people refuse to talk to others.

  285. Here's an idea: Get to know your neighbor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a novel concept:

    Get to know your neighbor. Do something nice for the guy. Wave and say hello whenever you see him.

    If he comes to know and trust you because you're always friendly, he won't feel paranoid anymore.

    It's worth a try. And don't give up after a month. It might take a few years, since it sounds like he's pretty paranoid right now.

  286. Long Range Acoustic Device for fighting back by DrGalaxy · · Score: 1

    http://www.atcsd.com/lrad.html

    Remember the story about the cruise ship that averted would-be attackers with one of these? Just camp out in front of his house about 200 meters away and every time he pokes his head out blast him with it. You aren't vandelizing anything and he is getting a taste of his own medicine. There is a built in mp3 player; perhaps you could use this device to broadcast a message of peace at 150 dB (about twice as loud as a commercial jet) or maybe just a Mars Volta CD.

    Despite the potential fun in blasting someone with this, I think you should first talk to the neighbor and try to understand what drove him to spend $800 on a teen deterrent. Be reasonable and try to imagine the situation if the roles were reversed.

    If you summon the police again, show the data sheet on the mosquito device to the officer so that they understand that not everyone can hear it. If the officer can't hear it, surely he/she will get someone younger to come and check it out. The drawback is that the old man might turn the device off in the meantime.

  287. Sound Absorbant Fence by herbierobinson · · Score: 1

    You could put up a sound absorbant fence made of 6-8" fiberglass insulation. It'll work better if there is something solid on your side of it, but it's most important that the other side of it not block the fiberglass. You could improve the looks of it by putting grill cloth on the fiberglass side, but you don't want to. The uglier it looks, the better.

    At this point, you have something to negotiate over -- You will take down the fence if he takes down the noise maker.

    --
    An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
  288. I am an audio engineer... by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    I am an audio engineer... and the fluid in the basilar membrane will indeed harden over the years with everyone. Some people are more resistant to this than others, but it does happen to everyone in older age with measurable effect. This is called natural hearing loss.

    I am 24 and have listened to high volume music for most of my life (concerts, headphones, etc) however I no appreciable hearing loss below 8kHz. I have not been officially tested for over 8k, but I have run tests on myself and it seems that my loss starts around 17-18kHz which is appropriate for my age.

    Since I am about to go on tour next week mixing for 20 bands at a traveling rock fest, I got custom molded ear plugs (-15dB attenuators) I had my hearing tested last week. After the test the audiologist flat out told me that even though I have abused my hearing, my genes were strong enough to keep any noticeable noise-induced loss from occurring. Apparently it is not that way with everyone. Some people's genes are allow them to be more resistant to damage than others.

    For more info:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basilar_membrane

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  289. Problem with these.... by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    ..is that acoustical HF in that range is VERY directional. So if it is in your pocket the radiated energy could EASILY be blocked by the fabric of your jeans. For that matter a piece of tape, or even your finger over the speaker or the vent for the transducer will probably block it.

    I have not seen them in use nor have I heard them, so they might have a way around this. I don't know.

    But I am an audio engineer and with HF our ears use a localizing process called 'Interaural amplitude difference' as opposed LF freqs which use 'Interaural time difference' with a resolution 30ms or greater. This combined with the fact that at these freqs the WL is very short (.6534cm or .2573 inches) makes it hard to get to our ears easily without line-of-sight.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  290. how we do it here by eti9 · · Score: 1

    i dont know how u do it over there but here in nigeria we ignore the fact that he is an elderly person, walk up to him and tell him to get rid of it before we get rid of it ourselves of course ina polite way if he refuses we take it out.

  291. Not used as a ringtone by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

    A cellphone can't generate high enough frequencies or sufficiently pure tones to take advantage of the Mosquito effect.

  292. Better Solution by woolio · · Score: 1

    The "sharing" of music with everyone is one of my biggest pet-peeves. People don't seem to realize that neighbors might want to work at home, and don't want to be distracted with, e.g. loud music of any sort.

    Indeed.... But you have an ally toward this problems and its not the police......

    It's the RIAA!!!!!!!!!!!

    To me, this type of "sharing" sounds like a public performance, which is expressly forbidden under the terms of most copyrights. Furthermore, they may have illegally obtained their music. I'm sure they would be happy to sue/imprision thy neighbor.

    1. Re:Better Solution by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Indeed.... But you have an ally toward this problems and its not the police......

      It's the RIAA!!!!!!!!!!!

      To me, this type of "sharing" sounds like a public performance, which is expressly forbidden under the terms of most copyrights. Furthermore, they may have illegally obtained their music. I'm sure they would be happy to sue/imprision thy neighbor.


            I would happily shove burning splinters under the fingernails and toenails of people who blare their music for all to hear, scalp them, and do some really nasty bits with boiling oil and squid. But give them to the RIAA? Now that's just mean.

  293. If your neighbor can't hear it... by rholland356 · · Score: 1

    ...then he won't know it's not working, will he?

    You know what to do!

  294. Easy. by eosp · · Score: 1

    Turn it off. Mosquitos come, I believe that qualifies as "combating".

  295. It was your problem by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1

    If you can't sleep through normal day sounds like dogs barking and cars passing in front of your house (which I find much more annoying than dogs barking), you shouldn't work the third shift. I perfectly understand getting angry when a neighbor is deliberately trying to annoy others with noise or other distractions, but anything else and you're the one being the bad neighbor, annoying the crap out of him with your ridiculous complaints.

    And no, I don't have a neighbor that is complaining about me. I did, however, live in an apartment and often heard loud music from the neighbors that lived on the apartment down from me (repetitive music I disliked at that). They weren't deliberately raising the volume to annoy me, and the walls were thin. As such, I accepted that it was their right to listen to music, and if I really couldn't live with it, well, I should move. After all, I don't anyone trying to stop me from listening to music or, if I had a house, stop me from having dogs that will actually bark and make noise if someone is threatening to enter my house.

    --

    Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    1. Re:It was your problem by v1 · · Score: 1

      I could see this if noise in this area was an existing problem, but the dogs created a disturbance on a whole new level to this neighborhood. Almost all the neighbors within six houses of him in any direction called in complaints. We even got a few complaints from across the street and alley. This is not one person not being able to deal with a little change in the scenery, this is more like an airport being built in your back yard.

      I know he was not deliberately tring to make us miserable, but when you live in society you have to make certain concessions on your behavior and the behavior of those you are responsible for, to make life reasonable for the rest of the people you have to be around. Whether you are trying to be a bad neighbor or if your lack of responsibility is causing you to be one despite yourself, you are still responsible for your behavior. 3rd shift or not, I should not have to deal with the next door neighbor's dogs barking nonstop every day.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  296. Was that a Tool quote I heard? by Friar_MJK · · Score: 1

    Tool - Jerk-Off

    Someone told me once
    that there's a right and wrong,
    and that punishment
    would come to those
    who dare to cross the line.

    But it must not be true
    for jerk-offs like you.
    Maybe it takes longer to catch a total asshole.
    but I'm tired of waiting.
    Maybe it's just bullshit and I should play GOD,
    and shoot you myself.
    Because I'm tired of waiting.

    Consequences dictate
    our course of action
    and it doesn't matter what's right.
    It's only wrong if you get caught.
    If consequences dictate
    my course of action
    I should play GOD
    and shoot you myself.
    I'm very tired of waiting.

    I should
    kick you,
    beat you,
    fuck you,
    and then shoot you in your fucking head.

    To parent: nicely done whether intended or not.
    To mods: no, i don't even want any moderation so save your points

  297. The lawyer's answer by douglaid · · Score: 1

    is: sue the b--- for nuisance. Get an injunction. Or: get the Environment proection Authority in.

    1. Re:The lawyer's answer by douglaid · · Score: 1

      or even better - send a woman in to straighten him out.