Slashdot Mirror


Scientology Given Direct Access To eBay Database

An anonymous reader writes "The Church of Scientology can delete auctions from eBay with no supervision under the VeRO program, and has used this to delete all resale of the e-meters Scientologists use. This is to stop members from buying used units from ex-members instead of buying from the official (and very expensive) source. Given Scientology's record of fraud and abuse, should eBay give them this level of trust? Will this set a precedent for other companies that want to stop the aftermarket resale of their products?"

684 comments

  1. Don't tell Chef but by qw(name) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just go to Radio Shack and buy an ohmmeter. They're a lot cheaper.

    1. Re:Don't tell Chef but by rishistar · · Score: 4, Funny

      But I'm Hindu you insensitive clod! I have to use an Aum-meter for my religious measurements!

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    2. Re:Don't tell Chef but by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, you have to buy a pair of tin cans to put on 'em.

      Actually, there's a couple other things involved, from what I understand--there's a coarse and fine adjustment for the resistances. While the alleged 'science' behind using it for some kind of invisible alien ghost detection is kinda bogus, it would be useful for, say, testing a batch of resistors for variances--you could adjust the tolerances as required, and so long as the needle stayed on-scale, your resistor would be acceptable for the value in question.

      I think I've heard of this access before though...haven't they had it for a while?

      Definitely abusive, and I definitely won't be going anywhere near eBay for the forseeable future.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    3. Re:Don't tell Chef but by thanksforthecrabs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does this mean my "What Would Xenu Do?" t-shirt isn't legal?

    4. Re:Don't tell Chef but by swb311 · · Score: 1

      a MEGA-ohmmeter. Or even a Hi-Pot.

    5. Re:Don't tell Chef but by NumenMaster · · Score: 1

      This is all too laughable. I need to start my own religion.

      --
      Where's my sock? There it is...
    6. Re:Don't tell Chef but by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny
      The Church of Scientology has ruined lives, had people imprisoned on false charges, sued innocent people into bankruptcy, committed espionage, harassed critics at their jobs, silence free speech, etc.

      There is nothing funny about them.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Some variant of a Wheatstone Bridge maybe?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheatstone_bridge
      =Smidge=

    8. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be honest, it is pretty funny. I know I'm a jerk for thinking it, but I really think that the sort of people who fall for the crap they are pedlling are simply paying a stupidity tax.

      What sane and rational person would want an "e-meter" anyway?

      (As AC, so feel free to mod me -1 Jerk :)

    9. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Z00L00K · · Score: 1, Funny
      E-meter for sale - cheap! Only $2.95! Just call +46 8 752 56 00 or +46 8 90 510

      I'll probably be modded down for this - or have this little post killed by the scientologists.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    10. Re:Don't tell Chef but by KublaiKhan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think so. I don't have any of my notes with me at the moment, so I'd have to look up where I found that information in the first place, but I'm fairly sure that it was some variant thereof.

      Interestingly, I'd also read that Hubbard did not build the first one himself, and possibly may not have designed it--that he had hired an electrical engineer to do that.

      As I recall, there was a patent filed in....1995, I think, that covered 'improvements' to the device in question (which is the grounds for the eBay removals, IIRC)--it may not work quite the same today as it used to.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    11. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Bobb+Sledd · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it's OK. "Xenu do" was already a movie from the 80's starring Olivia Newton-John.

      --
      "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye," "I am Bender. Please insert girder."
    12. Re:Don't tell Chef but by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Does this mean my "What Would Xenu Do?" t-shirt isn't legal?

      The problem with "WWXD?" is that it's just not a terribly useful guiding philosophy. For instance, imagine you're in a situation where you're having trouble getting along with your coworkers, and so you ask yourself, "WWXD?" The answer is that Xenu would round up his coworkers, put them on some starships shaped like DC-8 airliners, ship them to the distant reaches of the galaxy, and then nuke them into oblivion. So, as you can see, "WWXD?" has two major problems:

      First, the solution is *always* to put people on spaceships shaped like 1950s-era jet airliners and then nuke them, because that's all we know about Xenu. "WWXD?" dictates that you put people on DC-8 shaped spaceships and then nuke them in any situation, whether it's marital problems, dealing with the poor, or feeling frustrated that you dropped your grilled cheese sandwich: just round up a bunch of people, put them on airplane-shaped spaceships, and then drop a bunch of H-bombs on them. It's just not very flexible as a philosophy.

      The second issue with the "WWXD?" philosophy is more practical. Xenu was an evil galactic overlord. As a galactic overlord, he had lots of resources, in particular, lots of minions and henchmen to round people up and put them on spaceships, and lots of spaceships shaped like DC-8s, and lots of thermonuclear bombs. Unless you have access to similar resources, "WWXD?" is just not practical to apply to your everyday life. Although I admit, when I think of how to deal with Scientologists, and then ask "WWXD?", I have to admit that the philosophy does have some appeal.

    13. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Neo_piper · · Score: 5, Informative
    14. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're all F-ed in the head. (They believe humans have heads, right?)

    15. Re:Don't tell Chef but by neumayr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yes it is.
      Just like followers of the Catholic Church ("contraception is evil"), some flavours of Islam ("kill those infidels"), and pretty much all religious fundamentalists (those people calling their offspring "Baby Jesus", for example).

      All pretty funny, IMO. If I didn't think it's funny I'd probably be very depressed.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    16. Re:Don't tell Chef but by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "Just go to Radio Shack and buy an ohmmeter. They're a lot cheaper."

      Or put it on craigslist. Ebay isn't the only place to sell things, and craigslist items show up on google searches within days and no auction fees. Much better way to sell things than ebay IMHO.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    17. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just go to Radio Shack and buy an ohmmeter. They're a lot cheaper.
      Wouldn't work. The message that CoS is inadvertently revealing here is that anyone trying to practice Scientology in a frugal manner is missing the point.
    18. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Ozric · · Score: 2, Interesting
    19. Re:Don't tell Chef but by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Hm, it seems Scientology connects quite well to a fundamental book of geekdom: We can assume those exilants were middle-managers, lawyers and telephone cleaners.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    20. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      The second issue with the "WWXD?" philosophy is more practical. Xenu was an evil galactic overlord. As a galactic overlord, he had lots of resources, in particular, lots of minions and henchmen to round people up and put them on spaceships, and lots of spaceships shaped like DC-8s, and lots of thermonuclear bombs. Unless you have access to similar resources, "WWXD?" is just not practical to apply to your everyday life.

      I agree this is a big problem. I don't know about any of you, but all my spaceships are shaped like DC-10s.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    21. Re:Don't tell Chef but by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      This little post? Hell, those crazies will probably try to sue /. for this whole thread.

    22. Re:Don't tell Chef but by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2, Funny

      just round up a bunch of people, put them on airplane-shaped spaceships, and then drop a bunch of H-bombs on them. It's just not very flexible as a philosophy.


      Sure, but to give Xenu his due: I always seem to feel better after doing this, too. It's even more effective at picking me up than ice cream.
    23. Re:Don't tell Chef but by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think old ladies are pretty stupid for falling for con men too. But I sure wouldn't find it amusing if it happened to my grandmother.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    24. Re:Don't tell Chef but by snowraver1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to Wiki, It IS a variant of a Wheatstone Bridge, and was not built by Hubbard himself (even though he owned the patent for the device), but rather by one of the members of the church (presumably a higher ranking member). The meter was then given to Hubbard, who went on to patent it.

      Read the wiki linked to in the article summary. Very Interesting.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    25. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or build one, for fun and profit!!! Schematics here and more info on how to use it. -Anonymous

    26. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, you and I are also paying a stupidity tax, because our tax dollars subsidize this tax exempt company (Co$).

    27. Re:Don't tell Chef but by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "WWXD?"
      Scientologists are now allowed access to the eBay database without supervision? Shit-fire, these whackjobs shouldn't be allowed access to public transportation without supervision.

      What is eBay thinking? I'm not going to read TFA because it'll probably make my head hurt, but I'm hoping this was some oversight on eBay's part and the outcry is going to make them re-evaluate this "vErO" policy or whatever the hell it's called. I don't see why anybody should have this level of access to eBay besides the folks who administer the site. So this means that if I put a used computer up for sale on eBay Microsoft can delete it because there's a good chance that it has Windows on it? Disney can delete my auction of a used copy of The Little Mermaid? Or how about Apple being able to delete my auction of an old iPod (including 5000 mp3s)?

      I suppose it's just too much trouble to expect a third party to have to write a C&D letter to eBay, sort of like how it's too much trouble for the NSA to get an after-the-fact warrant signed by a judge before they listen in on the phone calls of US citizens.

      I'd like to say I'll never deal with eBay again, except for the fact that I've never dealt with eBay in the first place. I do like to barter through the Illinois Trade Association, though. If you think auctions are a cool way to do business, you really need to check out barter. It's one way to keep the government out of your grill.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    28. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Library+Spoff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does it tell you mdma levels in pills? cool, where can i get one?

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    29. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      There is nothing funny about them.


      What? Not even that Tom Cruise video they pulled from YouTube?
    30. Re:Don't tell Chef but by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Definitely abusive, and I definitely won't be going anywhere near eBay for the forseeable future."

      Let's just hope the $cientologists don't get some kind of super moderation on Slashdot. It sure would suck the fun out of threads like this one...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    31. Re:Don't tell Chef but by KURAAKU+Deibiddo · · Score: 1

      While I don't want to slag your post, I do want to point out that Apple is unlikely to delete your iPod auction (with mp3s). However, the RIAA is quite likely to delete it and sue you for infringing their copyrights.

      Out of curiosity, does anyone know if this has happened yet?

    32. Re:Don't tell Chef but by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you do risk getting sued by the C of S. Litigation is their answer to all criticism.

      That being said: where can I get a shirt like yours?

    33. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Cheeko · · Score: 1

      Thats something I've always been curious about (never thought to check ebay). Has anyone ever taken apart an e-meter to see what the heck they are actually selling you?

      Reverse engineered it, see what sorta fraud it is? You figure that would be the most telling bit about them. That this fundamental core component of their religion that you need to shell out lots of hard earned cash for does or doesn't actually do what they say it does.

    34. Re:Don't tell Chef but by spun · · Score: 1

      You do know that, technically, you need to pay taxes on the value of anything you barter, right? Just sayin', don't be surprised if you get bit in an audit.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    35. Re:Don't tell Chef but by SoupGuru · · Score: 1

      That is one of the best comments I've ever read on slashdot. Brings a tear to my eye.

      Cheers!

      --
      What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    36. Re:Don't tell Chef but by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      I think you're wrong on one point: it's funny when they get their asses kicked in the street and then urinated upon. That's frickin hilarious!

    37. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [This item is no longer available due to a patent claim by Church of Scientology International]

    38. Re:Don't tell Chef but by jdjbuffalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're supposed to report it to the IRS but if you don't actually make money (or reasonably would have) then they couldn't really get tax money out of you anyways. For example, if you trade your computer repairs for Joe's plumbing service and they are both about the same value (assuming just labor and no parts) then I don't see how anyone makes any money on it.

      This isn't to say that the IRS wouldn't try to get taxes from you but most bartering stuff is done under the table and unless you're doing massive amounts the IRS will never know.

      --
      We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.
    39. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      For example, if you trade your computer repairs for Joe's plumbing service and they are both about the same value (assuming just labor and no parts) then I don't see how anyone makes any money on it.
      You fail at economics.
    40. Re:Don't tell Chef but by SlashWombat · · Score: 1

      Generation "Y" scientologists are waiting for the Apple "I-Meter" to come out.

      "Good" Scientology Blogs have reviewed the I-Meter and say this device is the "bee's knees", what with the fancy touch screen, inbuilt megapixel camera, and enhanced "Aura detection" (tm) along with all the fancy wireless and telepathy interfaces. Rumour has it that these devices were manufactured on Xenu by advanced Thetan engineers. (Not in China, as some heretics have suggested!)

      Personally, I am just waiting for some Guru to crack the I-Meters DRM so that 3rd party Apps can be installed. (SCi-Notes, Sci-Calendar, Sci-Mail, Sci-evaluator ... All shareware yet written by fully qualified Thetan technicians...

    41. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      My impression of bartering is that people exchange things of essentially equal value...why would I trade you something that I valued more than what you're trading me? I would expect you to give me something of equal value, but different. Income minus expense equals 0, so no taxes.

    42. Re:Don't tell Chef but by spun · · Score: 1

      As the AC said to the other poster, you fail economics. Why? Here's a clue: the exact same line of thinking can be applied to monetary transactions. What you get is worth exactly the amount of money you paid for it, so income (the thing) minus expenses (the cash) equals 0, so no taxes.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    43. Re:Don't tell Chef but by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, if Ebay is willing to give one group of sociopaths access to their auctions, odds are there'll be other groups of people with axes to grind that will be clamoring for a similar level of control. This is a goddamned stupid thing for Ebay to do ... I can't think of a single legitimate reason for it. The only possibility that comes to mind is that there are some highly-placed Scientologists at that company. That actually wouldn't surprise me: those bastards are truly insidious.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    44. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      I disagree. The "WWXD" ideology is one of the first things psychiatrist learn in their evil course.

      ~Jarik

    45. Re:Don't tell Chef but by unixfan · · Score: 0

      And then a law was past which makes it illegal for anyone who is not trained on it, to use it. Which is probably why eBay made that decision. The sensitivity on that thing is amazing. The needle work is probably the best you can find anywhere. Not your average measuring instrument.

      You should take a pinch test. The moment you think of the moment when you were pinched the operator can tell. Does not matter of what you think of before. There might be a lot of needle activity as you think about various things, but the operator is trained to recognize the needle action that occurred when you got pinched the first time. Seeing the same needle action again he/she can tell that you were thinking about the pinch.

      You are not likely to find an ohm meter that will be sensitive enough to respond to thought.

    46. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they may seem ridiculous and stupid on the outside, but they're very scary on the inside.

      Two of my mates went to the Scientology protest this month...on the anniversary of the birth of Lisa McPherson, who lost her life while in the 'care' of Scientology.

      Apparently these days to avoid similar cases, if you're about to die, after having wasted all your money on Scientology, they tell you you have no hope, kick you out of the church, and send you home so that they won't be blamed for your death, statistically.

      ~Jarik

    47. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Good sir, that's the funniest comment I've ever read on Slashdot. Well done to you, my hat is truly off. :D

    48. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like bullshit to me..

    49. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Aphex+Junkie · · Score: 1

      Your example only works if everything is sold at-cost. I can buy a $20 widget from Megacorp, or I can buy the same widget for $10 from Jimmy's Neighborhood Widget Shoppe. Megacorp sells the widget at $20, so in your (incorrect) example you can say that they make no profit since I pay $20 for it. Does this mean that Jimmy makes a negative profit (selling at a loss)?

    50. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      It's eBay's site, it's eBay's rules. If you don't like them, don't use eBay-- there are plenty of auction sites out there.

    51. Re:Don't tell Chef but by jaxtherat · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up please :)

      --
      http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    52. Re:Don't tell Chef but by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I cannot help but think that by a business not allowing others to do business is a violation of the Anti-Trust laws.

    53. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Larryish · · Score: 1

      they really need an m-meter from the myconologists http://www.churchofmyconology.org/

    54. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then a law was past which makes it illegal for anyone who is not trained on it, to use it. Which is probably why eBay made that decision.

      Maybe you could you point to a reference for that imaginary law?

      Or perhaps you're referring to the enforced labelling on the device - "The E-Meter is not medically or scientifically useful for the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease. It is not medically or scientifically capable of improving the health or bodily functions of anyone."

    55. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Larryish · · Score: 1

      oops, i'm dumb. it is

      http://www.churchofmyconology.com/

      i must have been thinking of

      http://www.scientology.org/

    56. Re:Don't tell Chef but by syzler · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to report it to the IRS but if you don't actually make money (or reasonably would have) then they couldn't really get tax money out of you anyways. For example, if you trade your computer repairs for Joe's plumbing service and they are both about the same value (assuming just labor and no parts) then I don't see how anyone makes any money on them.

      So if Jane cleans Joe's house for dollars, I trade my computer repairs for Jane's dollars (previously Joe's dollars), and I trade Jane's dollars for Joe's plumbing service, then by your logic not one of us would have to pay taxes since the value of all three transactions are about the same no one would make money on it.

      Every financial transaction we make is a barter whether is is buying stocks, buying services, or buying goods. Rather than bickering prices at a market most people. as part of the negotiating, settle for a "fixed" price at a store in exchange for the convenience of more selections, better availability, and consistency.

      Sales tax is not the same as income tax. Sales tax is not based on the amount of profit you made, but rather the value (read cost) of the goods and services rendered or exchanged. When bartering at the market, the goods and services being bartered over have some type of value or else you would not be wasting your time trying to obtain them while attempting to retain as much of your current possessions or time as possible. Of course I am making the assumption that most people value their time.

      If you want to avoid sales tax legally, move some where like Alaska (with the exceptions of a few towns) where there is no sales tax.

    57. Re:Don't tell Chef but by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Like what? Yahoo Auctions doesn't exist in the States anymore, what other reasonably-sized competitors are there?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    58. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Ardaen · · Score: 1

      And then a law was past which makes it illegal for anyone who is not trained on it, to use it. Uhh... where did that little tidbit come from?

      Wikipedia says there is a court order that it is to be only used for religious counseling and that a warning is displayed on it. But nothing about any training requirement. A training requirement would imply a government organization involved or similar would it not? Anyone can build or use such a device if they want, as long as they aren't making claims about it having medical value...

      Looking up your claims on the e-meter's sensitivity and on the "pinch test" on the web of course produces interesting results... and doubt. But I have no personal experience or access to such a device to check.
    59. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Like what? Yahoo Auctions doesn't exist in the States anymore, what other reasonably-sized competitors are there?

      I'm pretty sure newspaper ads and garage sales didn't instantly disappear the moment eBay was founded, for one. There's also this fairly popular site called, oh what is it, some kind of river... oh yeah Amazon.com! Have you heard of it? And of course some guy named Craig has a list online you can use for stuff like this.

      You're seriously telling me you spent more than 5 microseconds thinking about this problem and didn't come up with a single alternative to eBay?

    60. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's just a friggin meter -- it doesn't have magical powers.
      i bet you could easily find a meter that can measure thought electrical energy, but you would not know what the results meat other than a bunch of noise. kind of like reading an octal dump of an executable maybe?

      the dowsers thought (and still do) that they could find energy lines and water with Y shaped sticks -- this is no different

    61. Re:Don't tell Chef but by jackbird · · Score: 1

      EBay owns Craigslist, though...

    62. Re:Don't tell Chef but by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The problem is for the unenlightened "WWXD" will make them think What will Xbox360 Do,which is of course get hot under the collar,turn red and crap yourself.And I think we can all agree that just wouldn't be very nice to be around.Not to mention smelly.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    63. Re:Don't tell Chef but by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      So by your analysis of "WWXD" you're kinda saying in the same sense "WWJD" Implies you would get crucified, die, resurrect yourself in 3 days, say hi to your friends, then ascend to heaven?

      Well i guess that may be more achievable than "WWXD", but its debatable.

    64. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      E-meter for sale - cheap! Only $2.95! Just call +46 8 752 56 00 or

      You're tricking people into calling Microsoft Sweden & asking for E-meters?

      How's that going to teach the scientologists a lesson?

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    65. Re:Don't tell Chef but by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Would yours look like this religion?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    66. Re:Don't tell Chef but by nickj6282 · · Score: 1

      Ok Mr. Smartypants, what if I head over to www.creativecommons.org and archive.org and fill an iPod with 5,000 completely free (as in beer and freedom) mp3s? Then what?

    67. Re:Don't tell Chef but by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so economics fails the first law of thermodynamics, which is why it will be eliminated from the equation soon enough.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    68. Re:Don't tell Chef but by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      As the AC said to the other poster, you fail economics. Why? Here's a clue: the exact same line of thinking can be applied to monetary transactions. What you get is worth exactly the amount of money you paid for it, so income (the thing) minus expenses (the cash) equals 0, so no taxes. profit is not made during the buying and selling commodities. Profit is made by getting more than what you pay for. And in general you'll never get more than what you pay for in an open and free market.

      No one who isn't under duress can be compelled to sell anything for less than what it is worth. Because value is merely a quantification of what price things demand on the market. If buyers are willing to pay you a certain quantity, then that is what the commodity is worth. It can not be said to be worth less than what it will fetch. And you would never give it up for less than what it could fetch unless you have no choice.

      With that said... profit can be made whether or not items are traded for green pieces of paper in between transactions. That is irrelevant. What is important is that someone somewhere has a gun to their head (metaphorically speaking).

      if you really want to know where profit is made.... go look at how much goods a worker can exchange his green pieces of paper for. On average it is ALWAYS LESS than the amount that the actual product of his labour will fetch on the open market. If you operated some machine that took $10 of wood (plus other assorted wear and tear on tools etc), and turned it into chair which fetches $109 on the open market. You probably got paid $20 for the effort. Where did that other $79 of value come from? It came from your labour that you undersold by $79.

      Of course, there is a large pool of starving carpenters also willing to sell $99 of labour for a mere $20, you have no choice but to do the same or die.

      But don't pretend that your labour is worth less than $99. Because $99 is exactly what your labour adds to what was previously $10 of raw materials. $10 is the price that much material is available for. And $109 is the amount of money that chair will fetch on the market. There is no other input into the equation.

      One might ask why any sane person would pay $109 for a chair, when they could simply buy $10 in materials and pay someone $20 for their labour. The answer would generally be along the lines of unless you happened to have access to the means of production (a factory), which enables 1 worker to do the work of 5 men; Without access to the means of production, it would take $100 of labour + the $10 to make a chair. Consequently it would cost you $110. Buying the chair from the factory owner actually saves you $1 (notwithstanding that he is extracting $79 of unpaid labour from the employee).

      So why can't you simply use the factory for a while and make yourself a chair? Or why cant you have that chair for its real cost of $30. Why must you pay someone $109 for a chair which only cost them $30? And how did they manage to get anyone to work for a mere $20 (and why isn't anyone willing to pay $21 when even at $21 they could still make a tidy $78 of profit in the chair business). well.. who knows... maybe it it is an intractible mystery, or maybe it is well understood.

      but either way, whether you barter for it or pay with green pieces of paper, there is a profit when the worker is paid less than the output of his labour will fetch. and it isn't because they are overcharging for the chair.

      whoever said no profit can be made in barter systems doesn't understand economics or what profit actually is. (or what money is for that matter).

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    69. Re:Don't tell Chef but by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      There is nothing funny about them.

      Moderation +4: 50% Funny, 30% Informative, 20% Insightful


      I completely agree with your point, but I have to say: I love Slashdot.

    70. Re:Don't tell Chef but by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      I don't want the mentally weak in society to fall prey to these vultures. Do you kick the crutches out from under a crippled person and laugh, because that's what they get for being crippled?

    71. Re:Don't tell Chef but by NorQue · · Score: 1

      The second issue with the "WWXD?" philosophy is more practical. Xenu was an evil galactic overlord. As a galactic overlord, he had lots of resources, in particular, lots of minions and henchmen to round people up and put them on spaceships, and lots of spaceships shaped like DC-8s, and lots of thermonuclear bombs. Unless you have access to similar resources, "WWXD?" is just not practical to apply to your everyday life.
      I agree this is a big problem. I don't know about any of you, but all my spaceships are shaped like DC-10s.
      What should I say? I'm European, my newest spaceships all look like A380s.
    72. Re:Don't tell Chef but by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      You said "there are plenty of auction sites out there." Which neither Amazon or Craigslist are, which was I was referring to. And I came up with plenty of alternatives, none of which are accessible to people who don't speak one of the major Asian languages or have bank accounts/credit cards from said countries.

      At any rate, I use Yahoo Auctions Japan or Eachnet. Loads more cool stuff and it handily trounces eBay (well, Eachnet used to be eBay China and still is, sort of, so I didn't want to bother mentioning it either), but as I said, it's not a viable alternative for most people.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    73. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      The answer is that Xenu would round up his coworkers, put them on some starships shaped like DC-8 airliners, ship them to the distant reaches of the galaxy, and then nuke them into oblivion.

      Sounds like good advice to me

      The second issue with the "WWXD?" philosophy is more practical. Xenu was an evil galactic overlord. As a galactic overlord, he had lots of resources, in particular, lots of minions and henchmen to round people up and put them on spaceships, and lots of spaceships shaped like DC-8s, and lots of thermonuclear bombs. Unless you have access to similar resources, "WWXD?" is just not practical to apply to your everyday life.

      ye of little faith, practice megalomania for enough lifetimes and your turn will come.

    74. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that raises this question... Who in Ebay's management circle is a Scientologist?

    75. Re:Don't tell Chef but by dushkin · · Score: 1

      Scientologists themselves don't know how that e-meter works. I know because I've been "audited", or whatever they call it when they're trying to convert you.

      Me: "So, how does it work?"
      Xenuist: "It works on energy."
      Me: "Yeeahhhhh, like what?"
      Xenuist: "On emotional energy."

      It's funny.

      Still, I'm worried that the Church of Scientology is getting that access because it has a bad record. Who knows, they may track people down? Delete auctions for various anti-scientologist stuff? (Dunno, pepper spray or holy water or something) I'm not sure just how substantial it is, but I'm a bit worried.

      --
      o hai
    76. Re:Don't tell Chef but by ardin,mcallister · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know you're a troll, but muslims are not the evil people you think they are. You're thinking of Islamic Extremists. They're the ones that blow shit up. And scientology is insane, thats why we can make fun of it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Scientology
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology_beliefs_and_practices
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology

      Read that crap and tell me they aren't more insane than Creationists!

      --
      "Some men just want to watch the world burn..."
    77. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Mythrix · · Score: 1

      To be honest, it is pretty funny. I know I'm a jerk for thinking it, but I really think that the sort of people who fall for the crap they are pedlling are simply paying a stupidity tax.

      But the ones who are sued or imprisoned aren't the ones who fall for the CoS, but rather the ones who are criticizing it...
    78. Re:Don't tell Chef but by strikethree · · Score: 1

      It is a shame that you are at +5 funny as I wanted to give you a +1 insightful.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    79. Re:Don't tell Chef but by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      Then the RIAA will definitely delete the posting because it poses a dangerous risk to their business model.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    80. Re:Don't tell Chef but by argiedot · · Score: 1

      Then they sue you for use of the word 'Smartypants®'.

    81. Re:Don't tell Chef but by EllisDees · · Score: 4, Funny

      >I thought making fun of religions was not allowed because it was insensitive and intolerant ?

      Anything is "allowed", as far as free speech goes. While making fun of a religion might be insensitive and intolerant, making fun of Scientology is neither. Scientology is a religion like tofu is a meat.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    82. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Schematics here [cmu.edu]

      and more info [cmu.edu] on how to use it.

      -Anonymous

    83. Re:Don't tell Chef but by endeavour31 · · Score: 1

      WOW - this description sounds like the usual perception of Microsoft around here.

    84. Re:Don't tell Chef but by jdjbuffalo · · Score: 1

      The tax money that I was referring to WASN'T sales tax. It was income tax.

      You should know that sales tax is typically only charged against GOODS not services. I know there are a handful of states that do charge you for certain services but they aren't common.

      Services was all I was talking about in my post.

      --
      We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.
    85. Re:Don't tell Chef but by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Here's a muslim belief (it's the literal word of their "god") :

      "All non-muslims are less than the filthies animals because they refuse to accept islam" (quran 8:55)

      How exactly do you excuse holding that particular belief ? Or were you only defending the muslims that don't follow the quran (that would be none of them btw).

    86. Re:Don't tell Chef but by krunk7 · · Score: 1

      i bet you could easily find a meter that can measure thought electrical energy

      Yeah, it's called an EEG, they've been around for quite a while.

    87. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see no claim of magical powers. But the pinch test works. Sit down and run around in your mind and every time your thoughts pass over the moment you got pinched he/she says "there", or "yes" or some such. And only at the exact moment that you look at the pinch. It has to be experienced to be believed. Clearly you need to be trained to know how to understand the meter as it is not obvious. Looks like a bunch of noise. Anyway if you are ready to be blown away then try to get a pinch test!

    88. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This pinch?

    89. Re:Don't tell Chef but by kalirion · · Score: 1

      If there's no supervision, the Church of Scientology could delete your iPod auction because it thinks you're an incarnation of Xenu.

    90. Re:Don't tell Chef but by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      Well she'd take out her chakram and....

      Oops, my bad, I thought it said, "What would XENA do?"

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    91. Re:Don't tell Chef but by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      May I just state here that I don't use barter in order to avoid paying taxes. Rather, I do so to prevent giving any benefit to certain corporations with whom I do not care to do business. It's the same reason that I like to buy used stuff and even clothes from resale shops (though I don't do too much of this). If I go to The Gap to buy a pair of jeans, then The Gap makes money. If I go to the Cathedral Shelter Resale Shop and buy a pair of jeans, the Shelter gets some income, the donor gets a tax write-off and I get a nice pair of jeans. The Gap gets stugots.

      I hate the idea that I'm expected to consume in order to support the economy, in some sort of "trickle-up" effect. Working people are supposed to spend their money and go into debt so that some companies shareholders can make a profit and some CEO can take home a 9-figure bonus. Well, fuck that.

      If I need furniture, before I go to Ikea or Wal-Mart or wherever to buy some cheap shit that's made by wage-slaves making 30 cents an hour working for rich "capitalists" who then look for ways to avoid paying taxes, I'll go find a craftsman who'll build it a lot better, with whom I can have a personal relationship, and to whom I can pay money which will go toward feeding his family and sending his kids to school. The less of my money that is skimmed off in profits the better.

      No, I don't believe in the kind of make-believe crony-capitalism that's practiced in many "civilized" societies. You'd be suprised how much of it can be ignored while allowing one to live a very comfortable lifestyle.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    92. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Av8rjoker · · Score: 1

      Or you can get the real thing at ebay while supplies last.

      Real E-Meter

      This will probably get taken down soon.

    93. Re:Don't tell Chef but by mooterSkooter · · Score: 1

      PopeRatzo: Brilliant thinking - much better than the (interesting but depressing) post before. Now, If only I could convince my missus not to goto Ikea...The trouble is, that stuff is a lot cheaper (being mass produced) than paying a carpenter for a one off job.

    94. Re:Don't tell Chef but by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is sometimes more expensive to have a woodworker make a piece of furniture instead of going to Ikea, but not always. There's a guy here in Chicago who makes shelves and bookcases that are really beautifully done and no more expensive than a similar item at Ikea.

      The other approach I like to use is resale shops. Here in Chicago there are tons of excellent resale shops where you can find terrific furniture for a fraction of what you'd pay at Ikea. Also, our neighborhood is adjacent to a ritzy, post-gentrification neighborhood. You wouldn't believe the stuff we've found sitting in their alleys the day before garbage pickup. Last spring, I found a brand new, pricetag still on it, Prada jacket that looks terrific on me. I've found working Sony 21" computer workstation monitors, a really nice professional miniDisc recorder (the previous owner had somehow allowed batteries to leak in it, but it worked fine as soon as I cleaned it up a bit), and my favorite, a $2000.00 reclining chair in perfect condition. My wife's theory is that when these rich folks get divorced, a pissed off ex-spouse throws all the other spouse's best stuff in the alley. Most of the stuff we can't use, but we bring it to one of the shelters or half-way houses in town. It would be a terrible shame if this great stuff ended up in a landfill. One Friday morning, when I was walking my dog, I saw the city garbagemen going through the alley and picking up good stuff and keeping it in the cab of the truck for themselves.

      It's a joke in my house that we're so environmentally noble, when really, we're just getting some great stuff for free. I just realized that the $200 Ecco boots I'm wearing at the moment came out of the garbage. Thank god for wasteful rich folks, huh?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    95. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Aristophrenia · · Score: 1

      Well, four days after the fact may be a little late to point this out, but your statement is false. It just so happens that I have a Quran/Koran. Convenient, No? I checked. It doesn't say that. Or anything close to that. Next time, try reading the book before you quote it. And just to clarify, I am a Godless Infidel. (AKA: !Muslim)

      --
      "Yeah, but by we know yo mama gives EVERYBODY root privilege..." -jpetts (208163)
    96. Re:Don't tell Chef but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should religion be separate from everything else, if you really look into it it is as fictional as hobbits. Nothing should be given respect just because it is old. I suggest reading somthing by Christopher Hitchins if you want a better idea of the stupidity.

    97. Re:Don't tell Chef but by NumenMaster · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. It's not funny at all as this isn't the first I've heard of all this. There are acquaintences of mine who dabbled in the past and told me horror stories. I wasn't meaning 'laughable' in a way that meant I laugh at others' agony. I do mean, however, the belief system is laughable especially after reading about the ohm meter nonsense.

      --
      Where's my sock? There it is...
  2. short answer by Romancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Short answer, no.

    This is favoritism. Microsoft doesn't even have this ability to stop the resale of their software.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    1. Re:short answer by AoT · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It isn't even favoritism, it's outright stupid given CoS' past abuses.

    2. Re:short answer by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's outright stupid, period. Why does ebay give this power to anyone? What do they possibly stand to gain from it? And how on earth does the CoS, or anyone, restrict after-market resale of their products? It's called the free market and it's America. Licensing software is one thing, but a physical object? What ?

    3. Re:short answer by Applekid · · Score: 1

      What do they possibly stand to gain from it? Maybe Co$ has a bunch of dirt dug up on ebay leadership thanks to Fair Game. After all, it's about always attacking, never defending.
      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    4. Re:short answer by rvw · · Score: 1

      It isn't even favoritism, it's outright stupid given CoS' past abuses. It makes you wonder what eBay has to gain from this. What's their connection to Scientology? Is Pierre Omidyar a member?
    5. Re:short answer by AoT · · Score: 5, Informative
      eBay explains here why they do it. I would guess that it's easier for them(read: costs less money) to simply let the companies do the work of deleting auctions, rather than have the company call or email eBay every time they want something taken down.

      I especially love their section on how things won't be mistakenly removed:

      How eBay helps to ensure that listings aren't mistakenly removed. A rights owner reporting through VeRO must be registered through VeRO before reporting items to us. Rights owners sign legally binding documents when reporting items to eBay. Ooooh! Legal binding documents, I feel so safe.
    6. Re:short answer by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, I simply don't understand why the government lets $cientology have its cake and eat it too. If they're a religion, then they shouldn't be afforded all these civil protections. I'm not going to get sued by my local Catholic Diocese if I print nasty bits from the Bible or some part of the latest Papal encyclical.

      I think the government should give $cientology a choice; either be a religion, in which case you can't sue, you can't seek special favors from companies over the resale of your products, and so forth, or you're not a religion, and you're a business, in which case you've got to pay taxes on moneys or products changing hands.

      And in either case, their lawyers should be disbarred for multiple cases of malicious prosecution.

      Or, in short form, FUCK $CIENTOLOGY.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:short answer by jandrese · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Filing a Copyright Counter Notice. For listings that have been removed at the request of the rights owner for copyright infringement, you may have the option of filing a Counter Notice with eBay if you feel that your listings were removed in error and you have not been able to come to an agreement with the rights owner.

      A Counter Notice is a form provided by eBay in compliance with the requirements of the federal Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The form is a legal document that requires you to, among other things, certify under sworn penalty of perjury that your listings were not infringing and were removed by mistake or misidentification. When you sign a Counter Notice, you will also have to consent to federal jurisdiction and service of process. Please read this form carefully, so you fully understand what you agree to if you choose to submit it to eBay.

      Once a valid Counter Notice is submitted, eBay will provide a copy of the notice to the reporting party and will advise them that the listings will be reinstated after 10 business days if we do not hear from the reporting party that they have filed an action seeking a court order to restrain you from re-listing the items.
      This part is interesting. Assuming eBay doesn't just file 13 these counterclaim notices, I wonder which way a Federal court would rule on it? I don't see where they have legal grounds for a copyright case on a hardware device that you're just reselling. I'm not sure many people want to deal with the CoS lawyers long enough to find out though.
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:short answer by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm not going to get sued by my local Catholic Diocese if I print nasty bits from the Bible or some part of the latest Papal encyclical.

      Different religions have different takes on things.
      Sure you won't get sued, you may however get imprisoned, lashed, deported or worse for naming a teddy bear or drawing a cartoon.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    9. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So wait, if I start my own religion does that mean I get the authority to remove auctions on eBay?

    10. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Get your religions straight.

    11. Re:short answer by drxenos · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A band where I live got sued by a local catholic church because the band's name was "Immaculate Mary."

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    12. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said Bible, not Koran.

    13. Re:short answer by pipatron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1) Group X could prove that anyone sellying Item Y was under contract not to resell it.

      Would this contract be legally binding in the US? If I sign a contract allowing you to kill me, would it be legal for you to then kill me? Would anyone trying to stop you from fulfilling this contract then be liable for knowingly helping me to breach a contract?

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    14. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First off I agree with the previous poster who said eBay should not give this much control to anyone.

      However, I think it is reaching to say (or suggest/infer/whatever) that eBay has no right to do this because it impinges your right to resell stuff.

      Yes, you do have a right to resell any thing or object you've legally acquired. But you don't have a right to do it on eBay. You buy and/or sell stuff on eBay according to eBay's terms, just as with any other service provider. As frustrating as it may be at times, eBay has the right to limit what is sold on their site. I think they're totally out of their gourd, mind you, but they are within their rights.

    15. Re:short answer by avandesande · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The OP was speaking about US law. Why the unnecessary tangent?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    16. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a religion; it's a sect. I do think that any entity that are doing brain wash, harrasment 'till suicide, litigation to put someone into bankuptcy should be declared illegal.

      As for Ebay, don't ever buy from them. Anyway, you're lucky if you're not victim of any fraud there.

    17. Re:short answer by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Show me a single American who got imprisoned, lashed, deported, or worse for any of that. Hell, Europeans don't get that either, although I can show you some stuff about how Germany tried to block the building of a mosque.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    18. Re:short answer by douglaid · · Score: 1

      I don't really understand where Scientology stands. Years ago, in Victoria, Australia, when Scientology first made their presence felt (and that of the E-meter) it was considered harmful to the young people subjected to it, and prompted our first Psychological Practices Act, which required all psychologists to be registered, and specifically outlawed Scientology and the E-meter. Now that last bit is no longer in the Act.

      Marriage Encounter, which my wife and I investigated a year or two ago, is conducted by the Catholic Church, and is presented from the point of view of a Christian outlook on marriage. Now it is open to all denominations, including Scientology. Surely the Catholics would not support a "Church" that is on the side of the Devil? I wonder if Scientologist couples find Catholic doctrine to their taste.

      I try to accept any denomination who call themselves Christian, but what I have heard about Scientology is all negative.

    19. Re:short answer by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm not going to get sued by my local Catholic Diocese if I print nasty bits from the Bible Maybe not, but they sure will sue your ass if you call them pedophiles.
      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    20. Re:short answer by Teun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's outright stupid, period. Why does ebay give this power to anyone? Because CO$ has a lot of nasty lawyers.
      They run a despicable business that can only survive thanks to litigation.

      This story of E-bay associating with CO$ cannot possibly be good for E-bay's reputation.
      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    21. Re:short answer by Zorbane · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I fail to see why this post is modded insightful (and no, I am not new here...just a bit too idealistic, perhaps). The issue at hand directly applies to Scientology's status in the US, and should not involve a game of "Your/their religion/Moral Code is worse than mine/yours, nyahhhhhh!"

    22. Re:short answer by obstalesgone · · Score: 1

      either be a religion, in which case you can't sue

      I didn't know this was true. What prohibits religious organizations from suing?
    23. Re:short answer by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

      Apple does though. They have the most illegal business practices you can imagine. Every store in the US selling Apple products is subject to Apple price fixing rules. They can't drop their prices below a certain amount on an Apple product or they lose their "license" to sell Apple products. What a scam. So is this. Clearly someone working high up in Ebay is a scientologist.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    24. Re:short answer by Teun · · Score: 1

      Is Pierre Omidyar a member? CO$ does not have members, only partners (in crime) and victims.
      The first often mutates into the later.
      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    25. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you won't get sued, you may however get imprisoned, lashed, deported or worse for naming a teddy bear or drawing a cartoon.

      In America?

      I thought we held ourselves to higher standards than that.


    26. Re:short answer by Copperhamster · · Score: 1

      You won't get legally imprisoned, lashed, deported or worse for naming a teddy bear or drawing a cartoon based on any religion inside the United States, which is where most of the Co$'s legal bullying goes on.

    27. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because scientology is active in more countries than just the USA and it fits.

    28. Re:short answer by SengirV · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod you up, but I haven't posted enough recently. I'm reading the responses to your post and am shocked that people simply don't get it.

      Well done.

      --

      Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

    29. Re:short answer by Teun · · Score: 1

      Please don't link this group with religion, it's not even a sect.
      They are just an evil type of business, similar to the mob.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    30. Re:short answer by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      FYI, Scientology isn't a Christian denomination and as far as I know doesn't present itself as such.

      You might be confusing them with Christian Scientists?

    31. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The form is a legal document that requires you to, among other things, certify under sworn penalty of perjury that your listings [...] were removed by mistake or misidentification. I wonder which way a Federal court would rule on it? (emphasis mine)

      Obviously a judge would say that the counternotice was filed improperly, because the listings were not removed by mistake or misidentification - Scientology knew exactly what they were doing when they were listed.

      Of course, the question of "but what about Scientology's legal obligation?" would elict a response of "that's a matter between ebay and scientology."
    32. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that spelled "oxymoron"?

    33. Re:short answer by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Short answer, No."

      Agreed, but here's one example of where they did:

      I had a NRFB MSOffice product posted on eBay and it was yanked by the Microsoft police because it was an "educational version." Their argument was, since I couldn't guarantee it would be sold to a qualified educational beneficiary as per their license distribution agreement, it was illegal.

      and so down it went.

      --
      uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
    34. Re:short answer by enjerth · · Score: 1

      This story of E-bay associating with CO$ cannot possibly be good for E-bay's reputation. What reputation? They've turned to shit, and long ago.
    35. Re:short answer by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

      Would this contract be legally binding in the US? If I sign a contract allowing you to kill me, would it be legal for you to then kill me?

      No, because case precedent says there are certain rights you can't legally sign away. Slavery and your life are included in that. They are deemed rights which you can't legally waive. Ever. (*)

      Would anyone trying to stop you from fulfilling this contract then be liable for knowingly helping me to breach a contract?

      No, because the contract is prima facie invalid -- meaning, it wasn't ever a valid contract, so trying to enforce the terms of said contract is meaningless.

      Cheers

      (*) There could be some place where you could, but that place shares no legal history with us.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    36. Re:short answer by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The counterclaim just states that you're confident the takedown was improper. Of course you can't know what's in the other guy's head. I guess they just didn't want to include language in there that could imply that the other party is guilty of a crime.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    37. Re:short answer by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Another question is if you can really assume that just because none were issued without a contract that all sellers are under the contract. Is it possible to resell an item if that would put you in breach of contract? I'd assume so, you'd violate the contract and face the fines specified in it but the item would still change possession.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    38. Re:short answer by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Different religions have different takes on things.
      Sure you won't get sued, you may however get imprisoned, lashed, deported or worse for naming a teddy bear or drawing a cartoon. For the most part, especially the teddy bear incident, the local governments have a very strong interest in focusing the attention of their populations on cartoons and teddy bears and away from their own internal problems. The countries where there were mass public protests about both are not the kind of country where mass protests just "happen" - they are orchestrated by the governments themselves.

      In Sudan, the teddy bear fiasco was just a means to focus internal and external attention away from the ongoing Darfur Genocide.

      Sure, there was a murder and some minor protesting in the "free countries" but not anything close to being considered institutional. Nut jobs are part of the cost of a free society.
    39. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else see $cientology and wonder what the cientology variable contains?

    40. Re:short answer by douglaid · · Score: 1

      No, I don't know what they believe. But I do know that they call themselves a "Church" and are on the list for Marriage Encounter. How can they be a "Church" if they are not Christian? More misrepresentation?

    41. Re:short answer by fbjon · · Score: 1

      I'd argue saying such things is slander, in fact, and you can thus be rightly sued.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    42. Re:short answer by douglaid · · Score: 1

      I am not making any statements about them, or whether they are a religion. They do have standards, though. When a former officer made statements about what they would have done to Nicole Kidman, they said that the person quoted had been thrown out by them. I don't know why anything from a "former" member was ever quoted in the first place. Clearly he had no authority to speak on their behalf. But they had expelled him.

    43. Re:short answer by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      screw microsoft, why do they let ticket touts, run wild reselling tickets illegaly but let legitimate resale of e-meters be banned?

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    44. Re:short answer by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

      Just to spell it out a little more, an illegal act can not be made into a binding contract. So your example falls apart the moment you signed a contract for an illegal act. It's actually the opposite, though. If someone knows about the contract and DOESN'T stop it, they might be looking at conspiracy to commit murder charges in some cases.

    45. Re:short answer by dbIII · · Score: 1

      No, I don't know what they believe

      I don't either and certainly don't want to spend the thousands of dollars to find out.

    46. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They masquerade as a Church, but they have no ties to any Christian faith.

    47. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially since it's clearly stated in $cientology's doctrines that it's OK to ignore the law whenever convenient, e.g. as part of the harassment of a "suppressive person" (critic.) Their extremely large and well-paid lawyer army lets them get away with murder, literally in some cases.

    48. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slippery Slope! Imagine the following:

      RIAA - you can't sell CDs on eBay.
      MPAA - you can't resell DVDs on eBay.
      Textbook publishers - you can't resell used textbooks on eBay.
      Nikon, Canon, etc. - you can't resell used cameras on eBay.

      You get the picture.

    49. Re:short answer by miskate · · Score: 1

      The reason why your local diocese can't sue you for reprinting parts of the bible is that that particular 2000 year old* creative work has long since passed out of even the craziest of copyright protection periods. It's public domain and has been for a long time.

      Scientology's stuff, by contrast, is only a few decades old, we know exactly who wrote it all and when and that person and his heirs have never released it freely.

      Now, if you were to record your local priest's sermon, transcribe it and re-publish it as your own work for profit, that would be a different story.

      --

      *Ok... the New Testament as it exists today is actually quite a bit younger than that, and the Old Testament is obviously quite a bit older. And of course the standard King James translation into English is a lot younger still, but even then it's well within the public domain, but you get the point... right?

    50. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      scientology == money laundering scheme disguised as a religion.

      Let's see, rich people "donate money" to church, which I'm sure is just as happy to take a cut [re: less than income tax] and then mysteriously hand the money back in the form of expenditures. I mean why else would these actors and what not donate millions. I can't believe that the CoS actually needs millions to get things done. That's just naive.

      It's more plausible that they're taking advantage of the tax-free status, than somehow a church needs hundreds of millions of dollars a year to stay in business..

    51. Re:short answer by Eil · · Score: 1

      This is favoritism. Microsoft doesn't even have this ability to stop the resale of their software.

      False.

      A few months ago, I was given a bunch of old laptops that had Win2k licenses on them. The laptops weren't worth much because they had bad motherboards or smashed screens, but some of them were popular models back in the day so I was sure some computer repair shops would buy them for the miscellaneous parts (LCD inverters, weird cables, brackets, an so forth). As a selling point, I mentioned that each laptop came with a Win2K certificate of authenticity affixed to it. About $50 in listing fees and a week's worth of work later, I put them up on eBay. After 5 days, the laptops were doing quite well in terms of bids.

      On the 6th day (one day before the auctions end), I get an email from eBay saying that Microsoft merely asked them to remove the auctions of the laptops. And they did, apparently without even checking into anything. eBay's message to me vaguely hinted at copyright violation, yet I violated NO laws, I infringed on NOBODY'S copyright. According to the 3 (!) cease-and-desist letters that Microsoft sent to me a week later, I was subject to some kind of legal action because I was trying to sell Microsoft software but was not an authorized Microsoft dealer.

      Yeah, I'm STILL trying to wrap my head around that. Even to this day, there are thousands of copies of Windows for sale on eBay and even more second-hand computers, broken or otherwise that come with Windows. But my auctions got shut down for the same thing and I got stuck with 2 dozen worthless laptops. The irony is that I used to report websites selling pirated copies of Windows, but obviously it's not in my interest to do so any longer. Unfortunately, I still have an eBay account because there are some odds and ends that I can only buy there affordably.

    52. Re:short answer by RobinH · · Score: 1

      There are a whole bunch of pre-requisites required to form a contract. One of them is that the acts carried out by both parties have to be legal. If they are not, then no contract was deemed to have existed between the parties.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    53. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Short answer: ebay and church of scientology are gay.

    54. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they're binding for the next billion years.

    55. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it a response to Anonymous? And/or is it related to undue influence within eBay upper management?

    56. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      null

    57. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      eBay explains here [ebay.com] why they do it. I would guess that it's easier for them(read: costs less money) to simply let the companies do the work of deleting auctions, rather than have the company call or email eBay every time they want something taken down.

      They learned from the best -- the buttfucking Bush-bastard administration, which said FISA was "too cumbersome", so they did an illegal end run around it.

      What the hell do you expect from a country that considers that kind of shit to be a religion? Germany has it right -- over there, CoS is deemed to be nothing more than a corporation.

    58. Re:short answer by pipatron · · Score: 1

      So I guess my question should be: Is there a law stating that you should always be allowed to resell things that you have bought? I think we have one of those in Sweden, and in that case, such a contract would not be valid. I'm not sure about this though.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    59. Re:short answer by risinganger · · Score: 1

      In fairness I don't think eBay have much of a reputation left that can tarnished by even a bunch of nut jobs like the CoS

    60. Re:short answer by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Well, in that case, slashdot also had favoritism for the CoS when it removed a post that they asked to remove. You can see the difference between slashdot answer to CoS and their answer to Microsoft (when they asked to remove the leaked microsoft code IIRC).

      What kind of power can this church have in the USA that even one of the richest companies can not buy? (i.e., what power can D. Miscarriage have that not even the richest [well... second richest now] man in the world can not get?)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    61. Re:short answer by Teun · · Score: 1

      Sorry douglaid, this was only meant as a general observation, not directed at you personally.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    62. Re:short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Microsoft doesn't even have this ability to stop the resale of their software."

      Not true. I tried to sell a copy of Office 2007 on eBay last year that I got for free at a Microsoft product indoctrination seminar. Within a few hours, I got an e-mail from Microsoft's agents via eBay telling me that the auction was deleted.

      The subject line of the e-mail was "eBay Listing Removed: Copyright Violation - Unauthorized Item."

      The body of the e-mail included:

      "Please be aware that any additional violations of this policy may result in the suspension of your account. eBay understands that you may be concerned about this situation.We encourage you to contact Microsoft directly if you have any questions. You can send an email to:

      netsafe@microsoft.com"

    63. Re:short answer by thetheorist · · Score: 1

      There are even better analogies here. Imagine if Honda started killing the listing for every used Accord on eBay (or even every part from an Accord). Or the Cult of Mac. What if Apple started ending auctions for used iPods? The interwebs would go nuts and even mainstream media would have a field day. But because this is the CoS, we'll crack some jokes and move on.

    64. Re:short answer by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 0

      Oh, my god. Sometimes /.ers get whipped into such a fury over those that they hate, that they will significantly relax their standards of rigor. Remember the time /.ers called it "fascist suppression of the freedom of speech" whem a guy *helped professors spread their message* (by making a website that lists professors who give ultra-left-wing lectures)? And now, look at this post I'm replying to, and how it got taken seriously by a lawyer!

      Now that I've gotten my karma up past negative, I can actually speak my mind when I want to. So, in order of my reactions:

      1) Um, right, dude, because "promising not to sell something" is the same as "murder for hire."
      2) Murder is illegal, so a contract requiring murder is unenforceable. "Not selling" something is legal, so the barrier to the hired hit that applied in that case, does not apply here.
      3) There are contracts ALL THE TIME where people sign away the right to sell a possession. They are routinely enforced. It's called a rental. Heard of it? I'm in one right now, for my apartment, slave that I am.
      4) Yes, I'm pretty sure you can be sued for knowingly helping facilitate a contract violation, or theft, however it would be classified here.

    65. Re:short answer by douglaid · · Score: 1

      I didn't take it personally. Any doctrine that is outlawed by Act of Parliament in a democratic country cannot be beneficial.

  3. Is this legal? by obstalesgone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it, in general, legal to allow a vendor to prevent the resale of their product? I don't understand why this would be considered beneficial to society or why it wouldn't be considered monopolistic.

    Of course, I'm no lawyer, but I've heard that everyone on Slashdot is.

    1. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It IS leagal for E-Bay to operate as it sees fit. This is not a censorship or monopoly concern, it is E-Bay operating the business how they want. It would seem that pissing off a few E-Bay customers is better than fending off lawsuits all the time. Even a baseless lawsuit takes company resources from more useful pursuits.

    2. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm an eBay PowerSeller, and I can tell you that it's rampant. eBay's "VeRO" program is regularly abused by liars who have no right to interfere in aftermarket sales of their products, gambling on the fact that you won't file in federal court to contest their "good faith" declarations.

    3. Re:Is this legal? by Romancer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Preventing the resale is one thing, direct access to a market is unprecidented. Since scientology doesn't actually own these devices any longer and ebay has given then direct access to removing these devices from private sale this is definatly a step over the line.

      Imagine if the makers of the other products out there followed suit. You would not be able to purchase second hand goods. Only directly from the original outlet. Kinda stifles the economy since the majority of vehicles out there are purchased as used items. Just one example but it would have a very bad impact if this method of controlling profit spreads.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    4. Re:Is this legal? by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      Imagine if Cisco tried to pull something like this on eBay. Or how about Ford or GM? If members rent the devices and don't return them that is one issue. The CoS will get away with this because they are considered a "religion." A money grabbing cult is a better description.

    5. Re:Is this legal? by AoT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Other companies have come before SoC.

      a Partial list

    6. Re:Is this legal? by Floritard · · Score: 1

      Of course, I'm no lawyer, but I've heard that everyone on Slashdot is. Pfff, OMGWTF. FYI, IANAL!
    7. Re:Is this legal? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 0, Troll

      I guess they don't sell it but lease if for perpetuity for a fixed fee. Same with some cable decoders I think. It's perfectly fine that the Scientology prevents its member from reselling the stuff. As for ebay, should they abuse the power, their would be probably be a complaint and they'd be in serious trouble. Much a do about nothing. For the record, the scientologist are a bunch of manipulative people with crazy ideas. They feed on stupidity which is fairly abundant.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    8. Re:Is this legal? by firex726 · · Score: 1

      I agree that a vendor of IP or software related products could prevent the resale of their product. After all whats to stop me from making a copy and then reselling those to make me profit. (I'll abstain from getting into a discussion of DRM)

      But for a physical product anyone should have the ability to resell it. I cant very well make a copy of an E-Meter, or other physical item without expending work and effort on my end. (Until they invent replicators)

      It also sets a bad presence.
      What if publishes of books want it to be illegal to resale books? Those college text books you bought at such a high premium, could not be resold and recover a few dollars; or all those book reselling stores / sites would go out of business. Its been years since I bought a book new.
      What if manufacturers made reselling vehicles illegal, think of all those used car salesmen that would loose their jobs and then who would we have to make fun of?
      What about houses?

    9. Re:Is this legal? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Imagine if the makers of the other products out there followed suit. You would not be able to purchase second hand goods.

      And it would kill a significant part of Ebay's revenue.

      If the program is ever abused to the extent you suggest, Ebay would probably stop the VeRo program. Or at least introduce a process to complain about unjustified removals, and then kick those companies from VeRo who abuse the system too much.

      I'm not sure if that would help against Scientology, as e-meters probably make up not much of Ebay's revenues. But if Dell, for example, would try to stop all sales of used Dell computers, I'm sure they would not last long in the VeRo program.
      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    10. Re:Is this legal? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    11. Re:Is this legal? by blindd0t · · Score: 1

      Just imagine if Ford started yanking every eBay Motors posting that had a picture of a Ford automobile. It is their picture, isn't it? I'd like to see how eBay would react to something like that...

    12. Re:Is this legal? by u8i9o0 · · Score: 1

      Imagine if the makers of the other products out there followed suit. You would not be able to purchase second hand goods. Only directly from the original outlet. Kinda stifles the economy since the majority of vehicles out there are purchased as used items. Just one example but it would have a very bad impact if this method of controlling profit spreads.
      Ignore the potential long-term impact to the overall economy, and instead ponder this:

      with eBay establishing this precedent, imagine what would happen to auction sites - like eBay.

      </ironic>
      --
      This is not my sig
    13. Re:Is this legal? by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      This isn't a market, it is one website who chose to make this deal with the scientologists, as is their right. Presumably, unless ebay is an actual monopoly (doubtful), it would not be in their best interest to limit resale of too many items since most of their money probably comes from such resale.

    14. Re:Is this legal? by obstalesgone · · Score: 1

      Does anyone have information to support this? If they do lease the devices for perpetuity for a fixed fee, then I side with them 100%. They have done nothing wrong (unless of course, that type of arrangement is against the law).

      In a desperate attempt to not appear to be a hypocrite, I like to extend to others the same rights that I wish extended to myself. I expect others to follow the agreements they make with me. So should the CoS.

    15. Re:Is this legal? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Imagine if the makers of the other products out there followed suit. You would not be able to purchase second hand goods.

      Notice how difficult it is to get second-hand software. And its not that the church is "allowed" to do that, its that no regular joe wants to challenge them in court.

    16. Re:Is this legal? by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1

      Hey, in the UK a bunch of ticket sellers managed to FUD the government about "ticket touts", so that now resales of tickets are effectively illegal. It's incredibly stupid and annoying, although given the track record of the current government it's not very surprising nor the worst thing.

      Rich.

    17. Re:Is this legal? by lexbaby · · Score: 1

      "Since scientology doesn't actually own these devices any longer"

      That's an assumption. What if they only "lease" or "license" these devices? Then these former members, etc. are trying to sell items that they do NOT own and the CoS does.

      --
      lexbaby
      "Be Brave, Be Loyal, Be True." -- Hawkeye Pierce
    18. Re:Is this legal? by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own post, here's a better link.

    19. Re:Is this legal? by jandrese · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The way I read the description, all you have to do is file a counterclaim and then it is up to the VeRO user to get a federal order within 10 days or your auction goes back up. If they can get a federal judge to go along with them then VeRO is the least of your problems.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    20. Re:Is this legal? by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

      The difference is, GM won't pull your auction if you're trying to sell a GM product, for example they had no problem when I sold a Chevy Blazer on eBay, but they will pull your auction if you're trying to sell a counterfeit part with their branding on it (this is a big problem for auto parts makers), or if you're trying to sell a T-shirt with the Chevrolet logo on it that wasn't licensed by them.

      My company has found people selling copies of our publications on eBay, and for us it was more amusing than anything else as we are not-for-profit, but I could see how GM might not want anyone to be able to buy a fake Delphi airbag controller for a GM car, for example.

      --
      Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    21. Re:Is this legal? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      The way I read the description, all you have to do is file a counterclaim and then it is up to the VeRO user to get a federal order within 10 days or your auction goes back up. If they can get a federal judge to go along with them then VeRO is the least of your problems.
      As "responsive" (non-responsive) as eBay is to issues with little buyers / sellers, my guess is that unless you want to spend a lot of time and make it a point of principle, it'll end up a fruitless waste of time.
      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    22. Re:Is this legal? by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Ah... But that item you linked to happens to be referring to their technical data; which is subject to Copyright and the statement indicates as such.

      They don't lay claim to legitimately obtained parts or technical data being sold on ebaY. Just pirated stuff or stuff that was obtained under license
      and covered under more than Copyright because of an EULA.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    23. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all whats to stop me from making a copy and then reselling those to make me profit.

      Making a copy, selling the original, and keeping the copy is illegal under copyright law, even if they sold you a copy that didn't have a 'no resale' EULA.

      So the argument that a 'no resale' EULA is needed to keep you from making a copy and selling the original is just a tad bit ludicrous.

    24. Re:Is this legal? by jmdc · · Score: 1

      Have you ever had an auction taken down in this way? If so, what did you do?

    25. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what the major video game companies want. It frustrates them endlessly that you can walk into a Game Stop or EB or any of the other games stores and buy used copies of games for a fraction of the original retail price.

      So what that the games might be a year old. So what if they are legal, legitimate used games. Sony doesn't get a cent for a used PS2 game. Microsoft or EA don't get anything for a used XBox game.

      Used game sales amount to several hundred million dollars and the game companies want the money.

      The ultimate goal is to make it impossible to resell old games. This was originally a cornerstone of the PS3 DRM, i.e. a game would marry itself to the first console it was played with and no others. But that was removed from the PS3 before it was finalized.

      The next generation will be digital download games that cannot be resold.

    26. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is it, in general, legal to allow a vendor to prevent the resale of their product? I don't understand why this would be considered beneficial to society or why it wouldn't be considered monopolistic.

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_sale for a discussion of the issues around the doctrine of first sale..

    27. Re:Is this legal? by chiui · · Score: 1

      I'm not a lawyer, but that is a trick that shouldn't be valid in a sane legal system.
      Imagine some corporations teaming together and design an internal, non-democratic legal system whose penalties consist in revoking all your non-properties.
      Yes, you could buy alternative products but it's not always possible as there are markets where there is little (if any) competition.

      --
      Moderation is overrated.
  4. What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems to me that given the recent Project Chanology protests against Scientology, this would be the perfect time for Anonymous to organize a massive boycott of eBay. Or worse, expand their DOS and hack attacks to include eBay, since they're cooperating with the CoS.

    Posting this AC because, frankly, I don't want anybody to think I'm advocating this. I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if it happened.

    1. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Ebay? Far too large a target. It would be like boycotting youtube.. their normal traffic fluctuation would completely mask even the most massive internet boycott ever mustered.

    2. Re:What will Anonymous do? by AoT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sure they could think of some creative ways to mess with eBay.

      Mass false bidding on auctions or the like. Not to give suggestions or anything, but they could start sniping auction with fake accounts and never pay. Doing it on a large enough scale could affect eBay's bottom line. They could start spamming people with emails about how eBay is going broke. I'm sure there's plenty of other things I'm not even thinking about that they could do.

    3. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're not thinking rationally. Were Anonymous to DOS eBay, they would make a one-day severe dent in eBay's profitability. eBay would have a tarnished reputation (worse than it already is tarnished) and Anonymous, having nothing better to do, would just use every proxy available to keep up the DOS for as long as they please with little fear of being found, while everyone cheers them on. Anonymous may consist of mainly pedos and trolls, but there are the few that know their business and can bring most any online company to their knees with a botnet or two, and there are plenty of spin doctors amongst the Anonymous. When they say they are Legion, they're not fucking joking. Ten million requests at once will bring almost ANY server without load management to it's knees, and last I tried a DOS on eBay for fucking with my mother's account, it only took a mere 5,000 simulataneous requests every ten seconds to DOS them. Imagine ten million browser tabs with auto-reload set using proxy connections. Yea, huge DOS.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOS loses, bantown would just hack them easily

    5. Re:What will Anonymous do? by arotenbe · · Score: 1

      Ah... so you are Anonymous Coward?

      --
      Tomato wedge sperm darts that are Republican.
    6. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous are doing legal things only now. Boycotting eBay would be a too big thing and we prefer to focus on the main target. Still, giving eBay a lot of bad press for this is definitely worth it! It seems the Co$ has had auctions removed for over 8 years. Back then, they actually had to send Cease and Desist letter to eBay first.

      For info about Anonymous: http://www.enturbulation.org/

    7. Re:What will Anonymous do? by kcbanner · · Score: 1

      the most massive internet boycott ever mustard." There, fixed that for you.
      --
      Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
    8. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and myg0t would just piss them off enough they'd shut their own site down

    9. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOSing isn't going on anymore, in an attempt to legitimize the movement.

      Nobody will take them seriously as long as the 'hacker' label persists.

    10. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting this AC because, frankly, I don't want anybody (meaning the Church of Scientology) to think I'm advocating this. I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if it happened.

      Emphasis and... well, the words emphasized are mine.

      Admit it; you know it's true. I agree, though, the CoS is an evil organization that has done far too many scary things to their critics for me to put myself (and my family and friends) out there as targets.

    11. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Divide+By+Zero · · Score: 1

      I, for one, am done with them for as long as the policy is in effect. I know they won't miss me, but it's not about them - it's about me not doing business with those whose policies I find objectionable.

      I think if more people thought like me, the world would work better, but I think everybody thinks that. :)

      --
      Dare to Hope. Prepare to be Disappointed.
    12. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and what is wrong with boycotting ebay? they own paypal remember? ;)

    13. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chanology thing is OVER. Our collective attention span was already getting pretty strained as the 10th approached. Let it die, dude.

    14. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I'm worried about is giving them direct access. How about all those anons that bought Guy Fawkes masks? Will all their information be available to CoS?

    15. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded? Ebay will receive more than 5k simultaneous requests every second.
      Your attempt most likely resulted you being filtered out, and ignored by ebay. Why is the parent marked interesting?

    16. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous is not your personal army.

    17. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent has some good advice, but:

      The DDoS attack at the beggining of the "invasion" was only that; we invaded. We landed front page on a lot of web sites, we showed them we are here and we are legion. It would be like stuffing a racist restaurant so people couldn't come in and drain their business.

      I don't think DDoS attacking eBay is wise. Anonymous will do as it wishes, but I do hope my brethren can hold down a bit and do the more logical thing:

      Swamp eBay with ohms-meters selling then as "thetan detectors" or whatever the corporation of $cientology shows them off as. This is the only way. If eBay thinks about attacking anonymous, then fine, we'll return the favour. But if eBay plays it smart, it'll stay completely neutral, possibly helping us, and forcing the corporation to try and delete SWARMS of auctions.

      Oh, and for epic lulz, every one of these should have a starting bid of 9,000$ USD, or 9,000 Euros, and the minimum bid 1 Euro/USD.

    18. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to join Anonymous but couldn't muster the courage.

    19. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Item: One ceiling cat, slightly used. More than likely has watched somebody masturbate.
      Starting bid: $0.99

      I can just vaguely picture the auctions which will be coming...

    20. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting this AC because... Admit it: You're ANONYMOUS!
    21. Re:What will Anonymous do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. how direct an access is what bother me more by superwiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It could be just the media frenzy making a bigger deal of isolated incidents than the real deal is, but it seems like the group is both paranoid and vindictive. I am more worried about them trying to use this as an opportunity to supress criticism than to use it to supress second hand resales. Although why one shouldn't be able to resell one's physical property in a free contry is beyond me.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:how direct an access is what bother me more by AoT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that the Church of Scientology isn't on the list of VeRO about me pages, the whole thing seems really, really iffy.

    2. Re:how direct an access is what bother me more by Applekid · · Score: 4, Informative
      At the top of that page:

      This list of rights owners DOES NOT include all rights owners that report through the VeRO Program. These are the rights owners that have chosen to post About Me pages. Many other rights owners have chosen not to maintain an About Me page.
      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    3. Re:how direct an access is what bother me more by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      But, take a look at this:

      This list of rights owners DOES NOT include all rights owners that report through the VeRO Program. These are the rights owners that have chosen to post About Me pages. Many other rights owners have chosen not to maintain an About Me page.

    4. Re:how direct an access is what bother me more by alannon · · Score: 1
      From the page you linked to:

      This list of rights owners DOES NOT include all rights owners that report through the VeRO Program. These are the rights owners that have chosen to post About Me pages. Many other rights owners have chosen not to maintain an About Me page.
    5. Re:how direct an access is what bother me more by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

      Though it seems logical that eBay should force all VeRO Program users to have an About Me page with information on what the criteria is for delisting. Otherwise, you don't know what you can't sell, it seems. Known unknowns and all that.

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
    6. Re:how direct an access is what bother me more by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Scientology is composed of a lot of corporations. It could be difficult to know if a corporation on an eBay list is affiliated with Scientology or not. I'm pretty sure any About Me page would not include the word "Scientology" in it anywhere.

  6. do they also have access to customer info? by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do they just have the ability to delete sales, or do they also have access to the details of who's been bidding, selling, and buying?

    Yet another reason to not use EBay or PayPal.

    1. Re:do they also have access to customer info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmm I wonder if they have access to my address, birth date, CC number etc. That would be kind of scary.

    2. Re:do they also have access to customer info? by postbigbang · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      Now hold down the A and semi-colon keys. We now have a e-Reading. Sorry.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    3. Re:do they also have access to customer info? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      In most cases, write access implies read access. If they can delete it, I would not be surprised if they can also see these details.

      This is complete idiocy and if ebay does not immediately stop this and explain the extent to which their database has been compromised by secret cults, I will cancel my ebay membership. Seriously WTF?

  7. Curious by jav1231 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who knew the NSA is the least the vast conspiracy-minded unwashed have to fear.

    I wonder who at eBay is high up the kook-chain in Scientology?

    1. Re:Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good point. After all, if you have purchased the object, not leased it, you own it and can do what you want with it, as long as it's legal, because it's yours!

      I agree with you questioning of whether Ebay has been infiltrated by Scientology. After all, with the legal attacks by RIA and MPAA they'd have been on better legal and business relationship footing to have given RIA and MPAA ability to delete music and movie CD and DVD sales.

      Maybe I better get some tinfoil ready just in case, but this really does look like Scientology has somebody in Ebay by the short hairs.

    2. Re:Curious by Dekortage · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, if you RTFA, it has nothing to do with insider knowledge. Instead:

      "The mechanism that permits the Church of Scientology (and others) such broad access and discretion is called the Verified Rights Owner ("VeRO") Program. Membership in VeRO is obtained simply by submitting a form to eBay explaining that you are an Intellectual Property rights holder. ... It should come as little surprise that VeRO members routinely overreach, as the cost of challenging a listing removal is almost always prohibitive. ... The VeRO Program makes a great deal of sense for some types of listings -- counterfeit Rolexes and Gucci handbags appear on eBay with such frequent regularity that those companies would be hard pressed to handle these trademark violations any other way."

      eBay has more info about their VeRO program.

      Basically, the original summary is misleading: lots of companies (e.g. copyright/trademark holders) have access to directly delete auctions on eBay. The Slyentologists are only one of many (but they're fun to pick on!).

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    3. Re:Curious by arotenbe · · Score: 1

      I wonder who at eBay is high up the kook-chain in Scientology? I think it is more like, "I wonder who in Scientology is high up the kook-chain at eBay?".
      --
      Tomato wedge sperm darts that are Republican.
    4. Re:Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, the original summary is misleading: lots of companies (e.g. copyright/trademark holders) have access to directly delete auctions on eBay.

      You mentioned fake Rolexes and fake Gucci bags. These companies are allowed to delete the sales of fake copies of their goods. They are not allowed to remove sales of actual real Rolex watches and real Gucci bags.
      The Scientologists should not be given the power to remove sales of actual scientology gear. They do no longer own the goods; they have no right to restrict the resale thereof.

      Please help innoculate your friends about the cults freakiness. Visit xenu.net.

    5. Re:Curious by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Ebay wasn't where you had to worry about high-level Scientologists. Scientology sued the Cult Awareness Network into bankruptcy with roughly 1500 individual lawsuits, and took over their name, phone numbers, and trademarks.

      Calling Cult Awareness Network for help with a relative being sucked into a cult now leads you straight to a trained Scientologist who will help you with that with Hubbard's "tech". That is frightening indeed.

    6. Re:Curious by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. Sure, Scientology does not have access directly to ebay to delete auctions, but with the VeRO program it's virtually the same thing. Ebay does not scrutinize ANY request that a VeRO member would make. Scientologists can send take down notices for things unrelated to their cabal. They could even send take down notices for IP that is NOT EVEN THEIRS. They, for example, could start claming that auctions for Orgone Accumulators violate their "patents" and although both the "thetan meter" and the argone accumulator are works of scientific fiction, eBay would comply with the take down request and remove the "offending" auctions. I would go so far to say that the church of Scientology could even start sending out take down notices for TRON auctions and ebay would pull them, even though the IP is owned by Disney.

      --
      "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    7. Re:Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if YOU RTFA you will see that the companies that have acces to VeRO do it to remove counterfeits of their product, but $cientology uses to to remove the real product. Big difference.

    8. Re:Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing that worries me is not that they are allowed to remove items, it's this line here from eBay's FAQ page on VeRO:

      "eBay will never give out your credit card information, except in rare cases when required by a court, or law enforcement agency. However, eBay's Privacy Policy states, "we can (and you authorize us to) disclose your User ID, name, street address, city, state, zip code, country, phone number, email, and company name to eBay VeRO Program participants..""

    9. Re:Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As maddox said, the best proof that 9/11 "truth" people like Dylan Avery are wrong about some massive government conspiracy to cause the attacks, is that all those people can continue to spout their BS without retribution. If you go up against Scientology, however, then you start getting followed and harassed, tricked, and your neighbours harassed and lied to, and attacked with "social engineering" by the cult, just like Hubbard had directed.

      At least the NSA and other agencies are under supervision indirectly by us through representatives, courts and laws - doesn't mean that they shouldn't be watched with a wary eye, but the NSA actually has a duty to help protect your and my sensitive data from being abused by criminals as well as to eavesdrop on it.

  8. easy answer -or- +5 insightful by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Given Scientology's record of fraud and abuse, should eBay give them this level of trust?"

    No.

    1. Re:easy answer -or- +5 insightful by Wuhao · · Score: 5, Informative

      If that's "+5 Insightful" around here these day, then I want a piece of the action: 1 + 1 = 2. This profound result is equally surprising.

    2. Re:easy answer -or- +5 insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your thorough and well-argued comment. As an exercise, I've decided to take the opposing point of view in this debate. So here goes:

      Yes.

    3. Re:easy answer -or- +5 insightful by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Well, as far as USA is concerned Scientology is recognised as a religion and its supposed financial and other crimes have never been proven in a court of law. Why, who, what is a different story.

      There are other countries where Scientology status is very different. In these countries such level of cooperation with the Church of Scientology is bound to raise some eybrows in law enforcement.

      So if you do not like this arrangement I suggest you find someone with a fluent French, German or Russian and draft a suitable letter to their equivalents of serious fraud or organised crime police divisions. Frankly, I do not envy eBay local divisions in these countries from this point onwards. They are on financial crime division hate list in most non-English speaking countries anyway, and this may end up being the proverbial pebble that will tip the proverbial cart.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:easy answer -or- +5 insightful by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      easy answer -or- +5 insightful (Score:5, Insightful)


      Like it or not, he called it.
    5. Re:easy answer -or- +5 insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pox on both your houses! Here my take on this:

      Maybe.

    6. Re:easy answer -or- +5 insightful by Zorque · · Score: 1

      The worst part is, their crimes actually have been proven in court. L. Ron Hubbard was convicted of fraud for stealing money from the church, and was a fugitive for the rest of his days. His wife and 10 other high-ranking Scientologists were sent to prison over their involvement in Operation Snow White. And yet the public doesn't know any of this.

  9. Time to boycott eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said

  10. does this work for every producer by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I am the manufaturer of a widgit, what do I have to do to gain access to Ebay to delete whatever auctions I want? Do I just have to write in the EULA that I have this right and then go onto Ebay and delete the auctions of competitors.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    1. Re:does this work for every producer by Surt · · Score: 1

      You need to do a little more than that.
      First, it can't be a EULA. It needs to be an up-front contract of sale, like the CoS uses.
      Second, you can't delete competitor auctions, only resale auctions. Deleting your competitor's widgets auctions would get you sued into oblivion. Note that the CoS is not nuking the auctions of competitive scanners, only their own, legitimate scanners.
      I'm pretty sure they have every reasonable right to expect to be able to enforce those presale contracts. Don't buy one under contract if you don't want to be held to the contract later.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:does this work for every producer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they're not claiming a contract dispute, they're claiming they can delete these auctions on trademark and patent grounds.

    3. Re:does this work for every producer by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Note that the CoS is not nuking the auctions of competitive scanners

      Only because such a thing doesn't exist. Unless it's labeled as a multimeter, of course. People generally don't use those to do Scientology "audits". If they did, Scientology might remove those too.

      only their own, legitimate scanners.

      In what way are e-meters legitimate? They're a fraud in every sense of the word.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:does this work for every producer by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Note that the CoS is not nuking the auctions of competitive scanners

      Only because such a thing doesn't exist. Unless it's labeled as a multimeter, of course. People generally don't use those to do Scientology "audits". If they did, Scientology might remove those too.

      only their own, legitimate scanners.

      In what way are e-meters legitimate? They're a fraud in every sense of the word.

      I'm pretty sure they have every reasonable right to expect to be able to enforce those presale contrac

      Why? And why should eBay give them the power to screw with auctions? Breaking of contracts is a matter for the courts to decide, not a matter of vigilante "justice" that screws with people. What obligation does eBay have to protect Scientology?

      Of course, there's not even any evidence that the units in question were sold under contract.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:does this work for every producer by Surt · · Score: 1

      Only because such a thing doesn't exist. Unless it's labeled as a multimeter, of course. People generally don't use those to do Scientology "audits". If they did, Scientology might remove those too.

      If CoS tried to nuke the auctions of multimeters, they'd get sued and lose.

      In what way are e-meters legitimate? They're a fraud in every sense of the word.

      They are legitimate in the sense of a Van Gogh painting can be considered either legitimate, or a fraud. One is made by Van Gogh, the other is made by anyone else. They are not a fraud in this sense of the word, and thus not every sense of the word.

      Why? And why should eBay give them the power to screw with auctions? Breaking of contracts is a matter for the courts to decide, not a matter of vigilante "justice" that screws with people. What obligation does eBay have to protect Scientology?

      Ebay has to worry about being taken to court as a black market. If they do nothing to prevent such auctions, they risk some court finding them to be aiding illegal sales. Imagine if ebay didn't filter out auctions of narcotics.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:does this work for every producer by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Ebay has to worry about being taken to court as a black market. If they do nothing to prevent such auctions, they risk some court finding them to be aiding illegal sales.

      Why would they have to worry about that? There's nothing illegal about selling these. "Black markets" involve selling things like illegal drugs or weapons. In what way is a CoS e-meter illegal? Can you show me the relevant laws?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  11. TAG IT: THENEWMAFIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what scientology is.

  12. F-meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think their membership is ready for an F-meter which indicates just how much they are being fucked over by their own church.

    1. Re:F-meter by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      They already do for $40,000, and if you try to resell it you have to buy another 9 of them to keep your membership.

    2. Re:F-meter by slashusrslashbin · · Score: 1

      As the manufacturer of the 'Cult of Slashdot' F-meter, I demand you remove parent post immediately!

    3. Re:F-meter by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Be sure the scale goes to 11

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    4. Re:F-meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a B-meter for the amount of B they have been exposed to...

    5. Re:F-meter by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      We're talking about Scientology here. The scale starts at 11.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    6. Re:F-meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it go to 11?

    7. Re:F-meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their bank account would be the -F-Metre. Unpleasantly large values of fuck would be conveniently coloured red. Whereas a black -F-Metre value would mean still good to fuck.

      I'm not too worried about this organization despite its unpleasantness. They screw over their people. What good is that in the grand scheme of evolution. There are far more
      successful institutions out there which may put funny ideas into peoples heads but aren't quite as obviously counter productive to the general well being of their people.

  13. Uh, what? by ack154 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was under the impression this was exactly the kind of reason eBay existed. "hey, i don't use this junk anymore, what'll you give me for it?" If the "church" was really given this kind of power, that's just not right.

    Perhaps if they wanted to curb the resale of their devices, they should offer some sort of buy back program? They'll still turn around and sell them again and make a profit.

    1. Re:Uh, what? by Suicide+Drink · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if they wanted to curb the resale of their devices, they should offer some sort of buy back program? They'll still turn around and sell them again and make a profit. I'm surprised it's not on some kind of leasing program, since it's their view that people who buy them can't do with them as they wish. To boot, I'm sure the ongoing revenuestream seems right up their alley.
  14. Off topic, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Shawn Lonsdale, whose one-man crusade against Scientology made him a public enemy of the church, was found dead at his home over the weekend in an apparent suicide. He was 39."

    http://www.xenu-directory.net/critics/lonsdale1.html

    That's pretty sad.

    1. Re:Off topic, yet... by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1, Funny

      A very sad story, indeed. It also spooked me out a bit, that guy has the same street address as my own...

      Double paranoia calls for doubly thick tin foil. I heard I can pick some up on eBay...

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    2. Re:Off topic, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So, which one are you?

    3. Re:Off topic, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There have been many similar incidents in Scientology's past...

      A member "drowning" in a tub of scalding hot bathwater shortly after reaching a high level OT and the Church finding out he was broke.

      People throwing themselves in front of trains.

      People shooting/hanging themselves.

      A guy jumping out a window to his death, clutching his last $300, his "suicide note" claiming the Church at least would never get that money from him.

      A car being worked on by an ex-member mysteriously falls off the lift onto him while he is working on it. He had been attempting to save his sister from Scientology during the timeframe that this occurred. His mother, several thousand miles away in Mexico, claims to have seen two men messing with the car/lift in a vision or dream right before the event. Interesting tie-in: another former Scientology member and open critic investigating this case "committed suicide" by shotgun in the same building that the mother lived in.

      There are many more stories like this. Usually involving people who have A) criticized the Church openly B) attempted to cause legal problems for the Church C) were members who ran out of money.

    4. Re:Off topic, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      in an 'apparent' suicide.

      -Anonymous

    5. Re:Off topic, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's pretty scary. That shows exactly how far the Cult of Scientology is prepared to go to suppress criticism. Staging a suicide is quite hardcore.

    6. Re:Off topic, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep definitely a smoking gun. Christians, Jews, Moslems and athiests have never been known to commit suicide or die under unusual circumstances.

    7. Re:Off topic, yet... by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 1

      I'd love to know how many AC posts are actually Anonymous in disguise!

      --
      Just -1, Troll talking to another.
  15. this = Scientology by eleuthero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Though the fraud claim will probably lead to slashdot getting sued, Germany http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/12/08/scientology_facing_ban_in_germany/5643/ and several other countries have taken steps to limit scientology within their borders. While many might seek to compare this to the actions of many Islamist states, scientology's claims often involve situations that fall under racketeering laws not aspects of religious freedom.

    1. Re:this = Scientology by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Though the fraud claim will probably lead to slashdot getting sued, Germany http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/12/08/scientology_facing_ban_in_germany/5643/ and several other countries have taken steps to limit scientology within their borders. While many might seek to compare this to the actions of many Islamist states, scientology's claims often involve situations that fall under racketeering laws not aspects of religious freedom.


      And then there's this:

      http://www.xenu-directory.net/news/19920912-globeandmail.html
      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  16. violation of interstate commerce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    law people want to comment

  17. *Comment deleted* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    [This comment violated the TOS from the Cult of Scientology. (tm)]

  18. Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it, where do I sign up for Anonymous? Wait.. I'm already Anonymous. Cool... let's storm the gates of Scientology and get those coveted e-meters that everyone simply has to have because... well... we don't have enough useless gizmos.

  19. bordering on illegal by mehtars · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This action of preventing the resale of a product is illegal--- once I buy a device, I am free to resell it. For example an auto maker cannot force me not to resell a car.

    1. Re:bordering on illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is absolutely legal. eBay has every right to allow whoever they want to delete auctions from THEIR website. They aren't denying you your right to resell anything, they are just denying you from being able to do it using THEIR product (eBay.com). For example, an auto maker can't force you to not resell a car, but they can certainly have deals in place with certain locations (such as partnering dealerships) that would deny you from being able to resell your car there. You are still free to sell it from your home or any other place that allows it.

      For the record, I definitely think eBay shouldn't allow this, but it is most definitely legal and within their rights.

    2. Re:bordering on illegal by modecx · · Score: 1

      This action of preventing the resale of a product is illegal Unless A) You don't own it (lease, etc.), or B) you're under some sort of contract with a resell clause.

      I personally do not know the circumstances behind this, but I would bet my last two cents that whoever "buys" a Scientology E-Meter does not retain full rights to it, via whatever legal mechanism. That's the way these Scientology guys roll, and this is reflected in everything they do. I would be floored with astonishment if this turned out to be an exception.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    3. Re:bordering on illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The right of resale continues to get stomped upon by our corporate masters. Sony's flood of predatory lawsuits against lik-sang.com testifies to that.

      Never buy a Sony product. According to them, you are allowed to sell it at a garage sale.

    4. Re:bordering on illegal by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I buy an e-meter for $1,000,000. I sign that I must give it back to the Cult of Scientology when I'm done with it and can't sell it. I sell it. At that point, it was mine (it wasn't a lease) and the person I sold it too is 100% owner and can then themselves resell it without any penalties at all. The CoS may come after me for breach of contract, but they can't sell the item to me and retain any rights to the item itself (except through non-transferable agreements, like a contract that won't apply to whomever I give/sell it to). Also note, they are claiming trademark infringement. That's like Ford saying I can't sell my used Ford because it has the Ford symbol on it. There is absolutely no legal standing for that at all.

  20. Ah, one more good reason... by Knara · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...to stop using eBay to sell your used stuff.

  21. Anything for Tom by sweetser · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is a privilege to do everything in our power for Tom. This crap is so valuable, you should pay a lot to prove you are a sucker.

    --
    Working on new views of old physics at http://VisualPhysics.org
    1. Re:Anything for Tom by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      This crap is so valuable, you should pay a lot to prove you are a sucker. I'm sorry, but what do his films have to do with Scientology?

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    2. Re:Anything for Tom by sweetser · · Score: 1

      Tom is a scientologist and a big promoter of the cause. There was much news recently about this video:

      http://gawker.com/5002269/the-cruise-indoctrination-video-scientology-tried-to-suppress

      The issue is not his films, but this video. To quote the site:

      "When you're a Scientologist, and you drive by an accident, you know you have to do something about it, because you know you're the only one who can really help... We are the way to happiness. We can bring peace and unite cultures."

      Smells like teen crap to me. I also did some reading about their beliefs, and it is gibberish.

      --
      Working on new views of old physics at http://VisualPhysics.org
    3. Re:Anything for Tom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom's crap isn't that valuable, but his daughter's crap sure is.

    4. Re:Anything for Tom by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, those e-meters do have one thing going for them: Judging from a screenshot of a deleted eBay auction, the solid metal (brass?) version looks somewhat classy (but still pretty kitschy). With a meaningful scale and built-in voltmeter thost things could almost be used as a decorative, insanely expensive multimeter.

      Of course, it's much easier and cheaper to just get a digital multimeter, a block of brass and some time on a CNC mill...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:Anything for Tom by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      This crap is so valuable, you should pay a lot to prove you are a sucker,
      in a Church of $ucker$
      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  22. I'm torn... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Part of me feels bad because this just sounds so wrong on so many levels and these people should be able to sell that garbage. Quite honestly I'm going to argue that the Church of Scientology is not environmentally friendly if they're going to force people to buy new and not ever get used. If they can't sell this stuff used it's going to end up in the garbage.

    The other part of me can't help but laugh hysterically that these people actually bought in to Scientology in the first place.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    1. Re:I'm torn... by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Not mutually exclusive... you CAN feel bad and LAUGH hysterically. It kinda hurts tho (*ow*)

  23. Thats it! by Coraon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I will not work with ANY company that works with those evil *deleted*. I will no longer use e-bay or paypal. they want my business back, go neutral or allow all religious groups to delete auctions.

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
    1. Re:Thats it! by ruinevil · · Score: 1

      You already can't use Paypal for the backbone of the internet economy, porn. It is already totally useless.

  24. What fraud and abuse? by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 1

    This post is way to subjective.

    1. Re:What fraud and abuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      subjective?

      Scientology is to fraud and abuse as Microsoft is to monopolistic practices

      Both have been convicted in a court of law.

    2. Re:What fraud and abuse? by Cheesey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fraud and abuse? Well, no Scientology discussion can be complete without a link to Bare Faced Messiah, the unauthorised biography of L. Ron Hubbard. It is very interesting stuff. The man lived recently enough that there are plenty of verifiable historical facts about him, and he was certainly an extraordinary guy.

      Any Scientologists reading this topic have no doubt already heard about Bare Faced Messiah and the lies contained within it, invented (of course) by the Church's enemies in order to discredit Hubbard and his ideas. To you I say: what if your perception of reality is wrong? What if you have been lied to, that a sort of Matrix has been built around you by your friends and colleagues at the Church? Wouldn't you at least like to see what other people's reality looks like? No need to take any pills, the truth might be a click away...

      --
      >north
      You're an immobile computer, remember?
    3. Re:What fraud and abuse? by mugnyte · · Score: 1


        Dont try to save them. We're all hoping for that secret spaceship project to move along and cart these loonies to the next interstellar volcano.

        Itd be much more fun to dress as pirates and attack the seaorg on the high seas than unwind their big ball of cult.

    4. Re:What fraud and abuse? by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 1

      Your response is subjective!

  25. indulgences by SoupGuru · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully the Catholics won't find out I've been reselling my indulgences too!

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    1. Re:indulgences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rome didn't get built in a day...

      (well, how did you think that Rome did get built?)

    2. Re:indulgences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hopefully the Catholics won't find out I've been reselling my indulgences too!

      Not a problem -- aside from excommunication, their sanctions only kick in after you die.

    3. Re:indulgences by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

      Reselling indulgences is a sin... remember to get yourself covered for that one before you die.

  26. -1, Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was obviously a rhetorical question. That's why the answer was easy. That's how rhetorical questions work.

  27. VERO Program by dcollins · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's pretty obvious from the early comments that not many people RTFA. (Comments like, "I wonder who at eBay is high up the kook-chain in Scientology?" and all that.) This is an established EBay program called VERO that Scientology has joined, like a bunch of other manufacturers, and (big surprise) happens to be abusing.

    The mechanism that permits the Church of Scientology (and others) such broad access and discretion is called the Verified Rights Owner ("VeRO") Program. Membership in VeRO is obtained simply by submitting a form to eBay explaining that you are an Intellectual Property rights holder.

    It should come as little surprise that VeRO members routinely overreach, as the cost of challenging a listing removal is almost always prohibitive. (See my paper on this subject here, and see the brave husband and wife exception to this rule here.) The VeRO Program makes a great deal of sense for some types of listings--counterfeit Rolexes and Gucci handbags appear on eBay with such frequent regularity that those companies would be hard pressed to handle these trademark violations any other way.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:VERO Program by Beau6183 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      FTFA:

      But Bill's e-meters (and the e-meters other ex-Scientologists have attempted to sell on eBay) are not counterfeits and do not violate the Church of Scientology's trademarks, patents, or copyrights.


      In any case, it's a lazy way for EBay to enforce rights compliance.

      Similarly, Mormon garments are another item that seem to take advantage of this program, so it's not exactly unheard of. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_garment/
  28. Can they use this to strike at critics? by adameros · · Score: 1

    If someone is critical of CoS, do they now have the power to stop those people from selling and buying on eBay as a way of getting back at critics?

  29. Ebay is right on schedule by MECC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If what they want is to put an end to their online existence. Giving CoS carte blanc to delete auctions is worse that putting the fox in charge of the hen house. Was Ebay, presumable savvy to how the Internet works, thinking nobody would notice this? What kind of drugs do you have to take to get that delusional?

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:Ebay is right on schedule by WolfTheWerewolf · · Score: 1

      > "What kind of drugs do you have to take to get that delusional?"

      Dianetics et al, apparently.

  30. Wonderful by LittleGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now where am I going to go to resell my Top Gun action figures or my White Tony Manuro Disco Suit?

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  31. It's Definitely a Monopoly by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    I offer a lower priced eldavojohn branded E-Meter for scientologists looking to test themselves with the judgmental grand inquisitor present. It comes complete with car battery and nipple clamps!

    And yet, the scientologists claim that this E-Meter is useless by itself, you need someone trained to interpret it. How convenient and yet they restrict its sale. If it's useless to the untrained, why do they stop sales of it?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:It's Definitely a Monopoly by Surt · · Score: 1

      DA: If you allow the sale of a device that requires training to the untrained, they may misinterpret the results and cause themselves eternal harm by not joining the right religion on the false basis of a misinterpreted result. By preventing access to these devices except by qualified professionals, they prevent people from causing themselves irreparable eternal harm.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  32. to hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... with "Boycott EBay day"... now its time for "Sell your E-Meter on EBay day!"

  33. The cat is out of the bag anyway by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A quick google for "e-meter schematic" reveals about 1200 pages. The first few that I checked have the circuit diagram for the e-meter, often directly drawn from L. Ron Hubbard's 1966 patent.

    For those who can't figure out the diagram, it's basically a Wheatstone bridge with a simple (crappy) differential amplifier. It's the sort of thing anyone could build from pennies worth of components.

    1. Re:The cat is out of the bag anyway by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      For those who can't figure out the diagram, it's basically a Wheatstone bridge with a simple (crappy) differential amplifier. It's the sort of thing anyone could build from pennies worth of components.


      Which sort of typifies $cientology itself.
      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:The cat is out of the bag anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, I'm not even anywhere near an EE or electronics enthusiast and I built a Wheatstone bridge for an art project once. It was hooked into a programmable microcontroller. I highly recommend it as something to try when you're required to build interactive crap for your school projects.

    3. Re:The cat is out of the bag anyway by dangitman · · Score: 1

      For those who can't figure out the diagram,

      If somebody can't figure out a circuit diagram that simple, I'd have to ask - "What the hell are you doing on slashdot, anyway?"

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:The cat is out of the bag anyway by NoPantsJim · · Score: 1

      Well, this is Slashdot, I'm sure there are plenty of people around here who could assemble these things in no time.

      That would be an awesome way to piss them right off, build mountains of these things and flood every market imaginable with them.

    5. Re:The cat is out of the bag anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>> directly drawn from L. Ron Hubbard's 1966 patent.

      So the patent must have lapsed by now... how would the church feel about someone making their own meters and selling them ?

    6. Re:The cat is out of the bag anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because what we want is a load of fools (who have parted from their money) getting an e-meter, going on a co$ website, and finding out how to use it, and helpfully thinking a 'stress test' is a good idea, before signing a billion year's worth of lives away and becoming OT.

      Flooding the market = kinda good.
      Giving people to them = very bad.

    7. Re:The cat is out of the bag anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then they won't get the training! You can't just USE an e-meter to mesure some meanigless value, you have to be 'cleared' first! Or something. IANAS

  34. Too Late. by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 1

    "Will this set a precedent for other companies that want to stop the aftermarket resale of their products?"

    It's already been happening. eBay is huge. It has slowly evolved/mutated over time, partially as a result of being pwned by entities with big money. This is just another example of why people do use other on-line auction houses (and should use them more).

    --
    uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
  35. My guess is... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's probably cheaper for Ebay to simply acquiesce to the CoS demands than to meet them in court. Even if they win, they may never see their legal fees recovered. There is less risk involved in giving in, too: they loose almost nothing if they yank the items, but could potentially lose a fortune if they don't.

    The Scientologists are just that scary.

    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    1. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But can they tighten something from it?


      (Pssst, "loose" is the opposite of tight, and is pronounced with an s sound, "lose" is the opposite of win and is pronounced with a z sound. The English s and z, not the German...)

    2. Re:My guess is... by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Scientology must die. It was already a sign that they are beyond control when they can intimidate the IRS let alone eBay. I find it amazing that they've been able to do what they've done to this point. They are indeed frightening and that is reason enough to want the whole operation disbanded. I wonder how the EU is doing with the CoS? Last I heard some member nations were refusing to recognize them as a religion.

      It's a given that CoS will abuse eBay's information. I guess it's already too late to purge my account.

    3. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom? Tom Cruise, is that you? Oh sorry, you're just a regular asshat.

    4. Re:My guess is... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      > Scientology must die. It was already a sign that they are beyond control when they can intimidate the IRS let alone eBay.

      If Scientology is allowed all this freedom, it means they are well under control. They are fulfilling a role. Determination of the role is left as an exercise to the reader.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    5. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Germany, especially, which is launching an investigation into their practices.

      You may be interested in the phenomenon of Anonymous--a sort of movement that has coalesced to fight against the abuses of the Church of Scientology.

      Interestingly, the 'official' position (if so nebulous a thing can have anything 'official') is not that the -religion- of scientology is wrong and evil, but that the -organization- that calls itself the 'Church of Scientology' does not deserve tax exemption, recognition as a church, etc.

      I've been keeping track of Anonymous for some time--they seem to be the origin of many of the various memes that end up getting popular, so they seem to work well as a sort of miner's canary when discerning the opinion of the internet in general. This is, to my knowledge, the first time that this particular phenomenon has occurred--an internet movement that has had significant international effect in the real world. What makes it even more interesting is that it -has no leaders-. Somehow, out of total anarchy, it's managed to coalesce a sort of identity to itself, and has directed attention towards a single goal.

      At any rate, it appears that as a followup to the February 10th protests (which were remarkable in themselves in that they were entirely without violence and none of the protesters in any of the countries were arrested--that has to be a first, in a protest of that scope) there are another series of protests being planned for March 15th--sort of a "Happy Birthday" to Hubbard, whose birthday was apparently March 13th and not conveniently on a Saturday this year. I've also heard some mention of plans for April, but not being an Anon, I don't know the details.

      IIRC, one of the Anonymous-sponsored websites is youfoundthecard.com; it's worth looking into.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    6. Re:My guess is... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Where I live, Belgium, they are not considered a religion. Neither are they in Germany:

      On November 11, 2004 the Administrative Court in Cologne ruled that the monitoring of SO Germany by the Office for the Protection of the Consitution is lawful. The Court underlined that there are clear indications that the SO pursues anticonstitutional activities directed at abolishing the human rights guaranteed in the Basic Constitutional Law (Grundgesetz). An appeal at the Higher Administrative Court in Münster is pending. This is, interestingly, also the only group that does not benefit from some of the basic advances of the European integration. For example, Scientologists have been excluded from the free circulation of workers since Van Duyn v Home Office in 1974.

      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    7. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I guess it's already too late to purge my account."

            Yup and thank you for your donation to the Church of Scientology. Btw you will recieve the latest L Ron Hubbard book and a personal greeting from Tom Cruise and John Travelota.

    8. Re:My guess is... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      It really is a bad sign when a nut-job religious group is able to get people out protesting against them on the streets when there's so much other stuff going on that's much more worthy of hand-drawn signage. I really don't know what to make of it - are they that scary/powerful/insane enough of a group, or do we just have our priorities that far out of whack?

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    9. Re:My guess is... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      which were remarkable in themselves in that they were entirely without violence and none of the protesters in any of the countries were arrested

      What's so remarkable about that? That's what the majority of protests are like - it's just that the media usually doesn't report them unless there's some violence or arrests.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    10. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most protests aren't quite as large and as widely distributed as the Feb 10 protests.

      Reports had attendance figures anywhere from the high 5k mark up to over the 9k mark, and there was a presence over a fair portion of the world.

      I found some of the footage I saw amusing, though, especially the Atlanta protest where they called out the SWAT team to stand on the Scientologist's side of the street.

      (Though...isn't there a water shortage there? 'cuz the Scientologists had their sprinklers on in a bunch of the pictures; I was under the impression that sprinkler usage wasn't allowed at the moment?)

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    11. Re:My guess is... by pla · · Score: 1

      It's probably cheaper for Ebay to simply acquiesce to the CoS demands than to meet them in court.

      Can we please stop using that acronym to refer to Xenu's Chosen Ones?

      I've known several members of the Church of Satan (basically a secular organization, not actually people who worship the token Christian bad guy), and they don't deserve the negative association with Scientology.

      Beside which, Scientology has as much to do with "church" as Amway does.

    12. Re:My guess is... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 0, Troll

      I wonder how the EU is doing with the CoS? Last I heard some member nations were refusing to recognize them as a religion.
      Which is silly. Why not recognise them as a religion, and then move to treat all religions with the respect they deserve, which is to say none at all. Scientologists may be a bit sillier in their beliefs and the way they treat their members than other mainstream religions, but not a great deal.

      Maybe I'm putting it a bit harsher than I should, but I think none of these religions deserve the privileged status they enjoy in so many countries.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    13. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      At first I felt like correcting you, but I didn't feel like breaking rules 1 and 2.

    14. Re:My guess is... by enjerth · · Score: 1

      they loose almost nothing if they yank the items With their other recent policy decisions, I hope this leads to a mass migration away from eBay. I plan on going somewhere else.

    15. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a given that CoS will abuse eBay's information. I guess it's already too late to purge my account.


      Too late. Apparently someone was trying to sell your account and it was deleted by CoS.
    16. Re:My guess is... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Germany, especially, which is launching an investigation into their practices.

      Germany has been in the process of launching that investigation for (IIRC) a year or more now. How's it working out?
       
       

      I've been keeping track of Anonymous for some time--they seem to be the origin of many of the various memes that end up getting popular, so they seem to work well as a sort of miner's canary when discerning the opinion of the internet in general. This is, to my knowledge, the first time that this particular phenomenon has occurred--an internet movement that has had significant international effect in the real world.

      You delude yourself. Scientology has been under 'attack', been opposed, been investigated, etc... etc... Since at least the 1970's. Like so much else, this is a real world movement that is using the 'net to coordinate itself globally.
    17. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I understand, the Church of Scientology is convinced at the moment that the Anonymous movement is being underwritten by either German psychiatrists or a space alien invader fleet.

      Zim assures me that it's not him. ;-p

      And apologies if I conveyed an unclear message; I did not intend to denigrate the efforts of the folks who have been fighting against the practices of the Church of Scientology for some time now.

      However, the Anonymous movement arose independently of the anti-scientology movement; it's only after (I think) January 23rd of this year that there began to be any sort of significant overlap between Anonymous and the existing anti-scientology organization. Anonymous has existed as an internet-based entity for some years now, and is only now making a significant crossover to the 'real world'.

      I would caution you against underestimating Anonymous--there's rather a lot more to it than one might expect on first glance. Dismissing it as "just another example of a real world group coordinating via the internet" ignores some of the more interesting parts of this phenomenon.

      As a disclaimer, I'm not an Anon myself--I just watch 'em.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    18. Re:My guess is... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Anonymous does not have leaders, which makes it the *perfect* organization to take on Scientology. Scientology is quite savage in attacking its critics, certainly not bound by law or morality, but it's hard to attack a group that is, well, anonymous. Anonymous is also quite used to having its ranks infiltrated by the opposition (another favotite Scientology tactic), but somehow seems to function regardless. It's quite an odd social phenomenon.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    19. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      I've seen it compared to the "Stand Alone Complex" from one of the Ghost in the Shell series. The comparison seems somewhat apt.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    20. Re:My guess is... by bjcopeland · · Score: 1

      It's probably cheaper for Ebay to simply acquiesce to the CoS demands than to meet them in court. Even if they win, they may never see their legal fees recovered. There is less risk involved in giving in, too: they lose almost nothing if they yank the items, but could potentially lose a fortune if they don't.

      ----

      Keep in mind that this is how fascism wins.

    21. Re:My guess is... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I hadn't thought of that, but it does seem appropriate - or at least the anime-loving anonymous would probably find it so. :)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:My guess is... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      What? That sounds like a pretty typical protest size, perhaps a bit on the small side. Bigger peaceful protests happen all the time.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    23. Re:My guess is... by croddy · · Score: 1

      My eBay account is closed and I sent a nastygram. I don't need used Man or Astro-man 7-inches badly enough to get in bed with Scientology. Why is yours still open?

    24. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude, you should be careful. Anonymous might blow up your yellow van.

      Tits or GTFO!

    25. Re:My guess is... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      Speaking of which, I'm closing my account. Thanks for the reminder.

    26. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      I don't really think that any single person or entity 'controls' Anonymous-the-entity--and as such, there's really no 'orchestration' going on, as orchestration requires a conductor--while Anonymous is more along the lines of a very large jazz band jam session.

      The phenomenon you mention, e.g. the dead dog picture, is not so much evidence of orchestration as evidence of memetic susceptability and a touch of perversity and 'peer pressure'. That is, if an image or whatnot evokes a strong emotional response, it is more likely to be re-enforced and passed along--this is one of the core principles behind advertising.

      I would note that were Anonymous to 'coalesce' and become a fixed entity, it would indeed fail to have any effect against Scientology--but so long as Anonymous remains nebulous, centerless, and leaderless, it still retains a chance of having an effect.

      Further, you've neglected to take into account the Silent Majority, as it were: both Scientology and Anonymous take 'recruits' from this pool, but Anonymous has a vast advantage in terms of recruiting--or at least, stopping Scientology from recruiting--from this pool. They have a much wider distribution, they have no problems in translating core doctrines, and they have no need to report to a central organization, or even follow guidelines placed by a central organization.

      Scientology has the distinct disadvantage that, as a recognizable entity with a structure, leaders, et al., action can be taken against it in any number of ways--Anonymous is far less susceptable to thinks such as lawsuits, governmental interference, etc.

      In the end, no matter what effect Anonymous has on Scientology, it will still be an interesting phenomenon to study.

      (And while Scientology does know what they're doing in most cases, they have a very large blind spot brought on by their rigid structure and hierarchy, and their doctrines: they are unable to change to meet new challenges quickly and effectively. That, and they keep blaming space aliens for all their problems.)

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    27. Re:My guess is... by KublaiKhan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, that's alright. My nice thick blinds will keep me safe. ;-p

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    28. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > I really don't know what to make of it - are they that scary/powerful/insane enough of a group,

      According to cult doctrine (which you can Google), those who oppose the cult may be "tricked, lied to, and destroyed". The cult's primary objective is called "clearing the planet"; ultimately, individuals who refuse to sign up and progress at least to the level of Clear are to be "disposed of quietly and without sorrow".

      Yes, they are that scary/insane. The goal is to prevent them from ever getting powerful enough to pull it off.

      > or do we just have our priorities that far out of whack?

      When it comes to being powerful enough to implement their genocidal belief system, the Scifucks are pretty small potatoes; they probably have fewer than 50000 members and a few hundred million dollars. But taking out genocidal cults is a new thing for Anonymous, and Anonymous is pretty small too.

      Hubbard was ex-US Navy, and got most of his "management" techniques from the bureaucracies of the 50s and 60s: the resulting organization is absolutely dependent upon centralized power, unquestioning obedience to orders delivered through a hierarchical management structure, and demands to-the-letter adherence to rules and policies that were written decades ago. Conversely, Anonymous is absolutely decentralized, has no structure, and makes up its rules as it goes along. That's a situation that neither group has encountered before.

      Memetic warfare is still a relatively new concept, and this one's as close to the "immovable object vs. irresistable force" as it gets. Two similarly-sized groups oppose each other, but operate with diametrically opposed organizational structures; you'd be hard-pressed to replicate this sort of situation in a classroom-sized experiment, let alone in real life.

    29. Re:My guess is... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The get far worse with each concession. After the IRS caved in on the tax question they went about telling everybody they were a real religeon. This ebay thing also lends them more legitimacy for the pyramind scheme.

    30. Re:My guess is... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      You may be interested in the phenomenon of Anonymous--a sort of movement that has coalesced to fight against the abuses of the Church of Scientology.

      That's giving them a little too much credit. Anonymous coalesced to troll, abuse each other, swap hentai, close off the pool, and invade other people's websites as and when the whim strikes. Project Chanology is just the biggest /i/ yet, and as long as it continues to yield lulz in the form of Scientological accusations of terrorism and mainstream media attention (especially where they repeat that 'over 9000' people turned out to protest), then Anonymous will keep it up.

      What makes it even more interesting is that it -has no leaders-. Somehow, out of total anarchy, it's managed to coalesce a sort of identity to itself, and has directed attention towards a single goal.

      This actually is an interesting phenomenon. Anonymous is nothing but a horde of teens and trolls and perverts, with absolutely no hierarchy. The campaign against Scientology is a self-organising emergent phenomenon arising from a complex chaotic system - a stand-alone complex - and it's actually quite scary. Anonymous can organise thousands of kids in Guy Fawkes masks to flashmob any target, and nobody can be pointed at as the mastermind. It's just a thing that happens. A meme goes critical, and Anonymous invades.

      IIRC, one of the Anonymous-sponsored websites is youfoundthecard.com; it's worth looking into.

      Anonymous is largely based out of ebaumsworld. If you're looking for the source of the whole thing, that's where you need to be.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    31. Re:My guess is... by dysfunct · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not only about holding the protest on a Saturday - March 15th is the Idus Martiae, the Ides of March, which perfectly fits Anonymous' style of rhetoric.

      --
      :/- spoon(_).
    32. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really think that any single person or entity 'controls' Anonymous-the-entity--and as such, there's really no 'orchestration' going on, as orchestration requires a conductor--while Anonymous is more along the lines of a very large jazz band jam session.

      Make no mistake there is someone orchestrating Anonymous, there always is. You just might not recognize it as control but if you showed a caveman a symphony he would think the man waving the stick is somehow making the music with the rest. I'm not trying to compare you to a caveman mind you, but I can't come up with another good analogy. In actuality it is more of a loose knit committee corresponding through a wiki (and other channels). Which is why I believe they will fail just the same as others.

      The phenomenon you mention, e.g. the dead dog picture, is not so much evidence of orchestration as evidence of memetic susceptability and a touch of perversity and 'peer pressure'. That is, if an image or whatnot evokes a strong emotional response, it is more likely to be re-enforced and passed along--this is one of the core principles behind advertising.

      The idea behind the entity Anonymous is to control that peer pressure and direct it towards what you are attempting to achieve.

      I would note that were Anonymous to 'coalesce' and become a fixed entity, it would indeed fail to have any effect against Scientology--but so long as Anonymous remains nebulous, centerless, and leaderless, it still retains a chance of having an effect. Further, you've neglected to take into account the Silent Majority, as it were: both Scientology and Anonymous take 'recruits' from this pool, but Anonymous has a vast advantage in terms of recruiting--or at least, stopping Scientology from recruiting--from this pool. They have a much wider distribution, they have no problems in translating core doctrines, and they have no need to report to a central organization, or even follow guidelines placed by a central organization. Scientology has the distinct disadvantage that, as a recognizable entity with a structure, leaders, et al., action can be taken against it in any number of ways--Anonymous is far less susceptable to thinks such as lawsuits, governmental interference, etc.

      You are mistakenly assuming that Scientology is a recognizable entity. Scientology is a religion. The Church of Scientology is a distinct entity that draws upon the resources of Scientology as a whole. Should Anonymous actually fracture the entity that is CoS they can draw upon resources from the main pool by playing the "suppressing our freedom of religion" card (please note our does not include me, I am a member of neither Anonymous nor Scientology) and they will not only draw upon the ranks of their own but upon the pity of the rest of the world. Anonymous does not have this power, It is hard to identify with something that tries not to exist.

      In the end, no matter what effect Anonymous has on Scientology, it will still be an interesting phenomenon to study.

      They are an interesting phenomenon to study. They are a good case study because due to the current setup as their flaws are exposed they will be a lot more visible than they are with most.

      (And while Scientology does know what they're doing in most cases, they have a very large blind spot brought on by their rigid structure and hierarchy, and their doctrines: they are unable to change to meet new challenges quickly and effectively. That, and they keep blaming space aliens for all their problems.)

      I believe that as this battle heats up we will find that the blind spot in Scientology isn't a blind spot like it appears to be. Scientology we put in motion from a flawed concept that we can all make fun of, but if there was nothing but the flawed concept they would have died long ago. I believe we are seeing the first true man made religion. Buddhism, Christianity, Judaism and all of the other major religions excluding Scientology are foun

    33. Re:My guess is... by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Scientology must die.

      Hah. With their headquarters in Hollywood, they are unfortunately on the wrong side of the San Andreas fault to be in sufficient proximity to a volcano for the ultimate irony to happen.
      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    34. Re:My guess is... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the lack of leadership and lack of any implicit trust relationships within thr group make infiltration and harassment per the CoS M.O. impossible, and also the willingness to admit anything accused against anon makes their slander useless.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    35. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've been keeping track of Anonymous for some time--they seem to be the origin of many of the various memes that end up getting popular, so they seem to work well as a sort of miner's canary when discerning the opinion of the internet in general."

      Members of "Anonymous" are, in fact, posters on the "Random" or /b/ section of the 4chan.org message board. (Given 4chan lacks a membership system and is effectively anonymous, "Anonymous" is an appropriate sobriquet for a /b/ board poster.) "Project Chanology"-- /b/'s codename for the coordinated DDOS and IRL protests of scientology-- started several months ago and has gained considerable momentum since then. These anti-scientology crusaders are predominately white, sexually frustrated, middle class, pre-pubescent teenage males comfortably ensconced in their mom's basements. Not that their goals are not laudable...

    36. Re:My guess is... by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Someone has been watching Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex. ;)

    37. Re:My guess is... by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      "Anonymous" is a bunch of forum trolls on 4chan.org, where they made an entire board dedicated to forum trolls, and has been gaining popularity since the "lolcats," "rickrolls," and various other weird memes they made up to annoy people started getting more popular.

      They're only called "Anonymous" because it's the default username of the board, and none of them post their identities because they tend to do and say horribly offensive things all the time. They started out invading other boards and calling into internet radio shows and such, and made up this concept of themselves as a collective force or organization as a joke. Apparently, it's catching on, and people are taking the damn thing seriously.

      Sure this whole anti-Scientology thing looks pretty impressive, but it reminds me a lot of the time they ran white-supremacist Hal Turner's internet radio show into the ground by racking up huge bandwidth charges, flooding his show with fake calls, and protesting on his lawn. It sounds pretty noble and all, until you look into it and talk to some of the people that frequent /b/, and find out that the apparent reason all this started was that he was badmouthing pedophiles, whom forum goers pretend to admire.

      Seriously, these guys are the trolls that normal trolls are afraid of. They're a bunch of bored 15-year-olds in the Lord of the Flies of internet BBSes. On the whole, they're the most incredibly racist, sexist, puerile, disgusting, mean-spirited and anti-social group of people you're going to find online these days, and the main reason they do "good" things is for attention and to make a name for themselves as the alpha-assholes on the scene today, taking on all comers.

      That said, the place is hilarious and I probably visit the site far more often than is healthy or perhaps legal.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    38. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientology must die.
      When I look at the resources thrown at the Hell's Angel's who have known criminal elements, I look at Co$ and think any serious government intervention is unlikely. Better just to take away their tax exempt status and treat them like the money grubbing, power hungry maniacs that they are, after all they have a lot in common with M$ and people evangelise Gates and his products in the same way, and M$ pay tax,, well most of the time.

      I think I better post this one anonymously.

    39. Re:My guess is... by droptone · · Score: 1

      Anonymous is the perfect organization to take on Scientology? wtf? Do you even know where Anonymous comes from? All Scientology needs to do is scan /b/ on virtually any chan for a few hours and have enough dirt to discredit Anonymous in the eyes of the public.

      In the eyes of a good portion of Anonymous (or the people they associate with): child porn is considered hot and funny, racism is hilarious and especially racist/prejudice cartoons from StormFront and the word "nigger", it is also acceptable to laugh at a kid who killed himself because he lost his iPod, etc, etc.

      How can people so closely associated with those sorts of views be the perfect organization to take on Scientology? Sure, they are distributed so there isn't necessarily one head they can chop off. Sure, they have some technical skills so even if you take down one of their main image boards, they can create another. But in the eyes of the public, there are so many things that can be associated with Anonymous that they are a horrible choice for advocating any position.

      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    40. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is also acceptable to laugh at a kid who killed himself because he lost his iPod, If a kid kills himself over an ipod, he deserves to be laughed at. Since you used the term 'kid', it sounds as if he was young enough to have removed himself from the gene pool. Sounds like everyone wins.
    41. Re:My guess is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous here. I think you should come out to the protests on March 15th. Join us! But I must warn you: we do not have jackets.

    42. Re:My guess is... by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      Cult: A small unsuccessful religion. Religion: a large successful cult

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  36. I Wondered Why... by gsmalleus · · Score: 1

    I wondered why I couldn't find any Xenu or Anti-Scientology items on ebay.

  37. EBay's to Blame by thegdorf · · Score: 1

    Precisely no one should be surprised that the CoS is engaging in this behaviour. What disturbs me is that EBay doesn't monitor the actions of its VeRO partners far more closely. Given the power that they bestow on them, EBay must put some type of oversight into place. Allowing their partners to excise auctions however they please without concern that they may overstep their bounds (and possibly lose their privileged status) is a horrendous feature of the program. As many have said, "I'm no lawyer", but in addition to the tortious nature of CoS's actions, I suspect that such lax oversight could find EBay guilty of negligence as well. Any thoughts?

  38. Head Shops & E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

    The real question is, since when does your religious paraphernalia need to be be plugged into the wall?

    "In The Year 2000... In The Year 2000..."

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    1. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by rootofevil · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    2. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Hillgiant · · Score: 5, Funny

      Erm, excuse me. What does God need with a starship?

      --
      -
    3. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 4, Informative

      You must not be very familiar with the space opera that is Scientology. You see it's all about getting the thetans out. I believe they were an ancient race, that Xenu the galactic prince brought to earth 75 million years ago, set near some volcanoes near Hawaii. Then dropped H bombs in said volcanoes, and somehow their spirits latched on to us homo sapiens, and block our natural super powers, caused all our problems... Etc etc etc. I don't think god shows up in the story, but I could be wrong...

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    4. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by notnAP · · Score: 4, Informative

      And you must not be very familiar with the space opera that is Star Trek, from which the GP was quoting quite humorously.

    5. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, after that volcano thing, all the ghosts were trapped in some kind of cineplex where they were shown movies that imparted the idea of 'god' into 'em.

      I read something this morning about the OTVIII documents saying something about Jesus being a pedophile, too, but I don't recall where I read that.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    6. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      You don't know the Kirk quote from "Star Trek, The Undiscovered Country"?

      Please turn in your both your geek and nerd badges at the door.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    7. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by police+inkblotter · · Score: 1

      Since vaporizers were invented?

    8. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by ethanms · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's sad, but I can't stop myself from replying to this obvious nerd bait...... the quote is from Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, not "The Undiscovered Country"

    9. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    10. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by monkeyboythom · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dunno...my girlfriend has religious paraphenalia that needs electricity. I know because when I am in another room, I can hear a buzzing sound in the bedroom and her chanting, "oh, god. oh, god! ohhhhh, gooood!"

      The real question is, since when does your religious paraphernalia need to be be plugged into the wall?
    11. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I will turn in nothing! Starships and Federations, no sir. My passions lay to the east, in Beleriand.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    12. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Funny

      Argh!

      You are correct. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098382/quotes

      I give myself one geek demerit for picking the wrong movie.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    13. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by d3ac0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      LIES! ./ posters don't HAVE girlfriends!

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    14. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... to boldly correct what no man had corrected before ... :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    15. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      But Beleriand was in the west (though not the Uttermost West). Unless you're of the Ainur, your geek card, please.

    16. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      Yes I should of clarified, I was referring to it as if I was in Valinor as one of the Noldor with a heart of vengence... But also I could of been referring to east of the Isle of Erassea. And what of the Falas, is that considered part of Beleriand? And what of Nevrast and the Isle of Balar?

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    17. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by TrekkieGod · · Score: 3, Funny

      I give myself one geek demerit for picking the wrong movie.

      I hereby smite you.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    18. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by 74nova · · Score: 1

      yeah, and so do you! because, um... i said so! yeah, that's all the citing i need!

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    19. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it's quite understandable that the associated trauma of stabbing forks into your eyes after watching Star Trek V would lead to some memory loss. It can also lead to strange feelings of nostalga for the first Star Trek movie and an overwhelming but inexplicable desire for something called a "marsh melon".

      Don't worry, it will all pass soon.

    20. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by TobyRush · · Score: 3, Funny

      the quote is from Star Trek V: The Final Frontier

      And therein lies the true wonder... not only did he quote from Star Trek, and not only did he quote Shatner during that intermediate period when he was not cool, but he quoted from ST V, which most consider the worst one ever made.

      That's no nerd, that's an übernerd. We are not worthy.

      --
      Sam! If you will let me be,
      I will try them.
      You will see.
    21. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you know, I've never bothered to actually find out what the scientologist whackjobs believe. thanks for the summary, all I need to know. I take it when infants they were all spanked on their heads soft spot, often.

    22. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, the reason that guy brought up god was because its a Star Trek V reference.

    23. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You've obviously never enjoyed a jacuzzi baptismal font.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    24. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Please move to Alabama so she could claim this law violates her religious beliefs.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    25. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but you do have a mom.

    26. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a metaphorical starship.

    27. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by mattsucks · · Score: 1

      LIES! ./ posters don't HAVE girlfriends!

      He thinks he has a girlfriend, but in reality he is supporting a woman and her B.O.B. Never fear, he's still one of us. Maybe even moreso.
    28. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever thought you should spend more time with girlfriend and less on net?

    29. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by gothzilla · · Score: 1

      Last I checked the Harry Potter vibrating broom used batteries. I don't think it came with an adaptor to plug into the wall.

    30. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by d3ac0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hereby smite you.


      What does a TrekkieGod need with a...

      Oh, nevermind.
      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    31. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by spun · · Score: 5, Informative

      What is your problem? The Fishman Affidavit is a court document, that's not a good enough cite for you that L. Ron Hubbard actually said that Jesus likes little boys? Or did you not bother to read (or not comprehend) the website and assumed the poster was bashing your favorite fairy tale?

      Let me be perfectly clear then: Scientology makes the claim, in their official religious literature, that Jesus was a homosexual pedophile. That is backed up by court records.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    32. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Look for the southpark version of it.. it's very instructive - as well as being very funny.

    33. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      You see it's all about getting the thetans out. [...] somehow their spirits latched on to us homo sapiens, and block our natural super powers

      It's like the Force, but backwards.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    34. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by 74nova · · Score: 1

      wow, take another sip of your coffee, take a deep breath and try to relax. i apparently wasn't clear enough, my honest apologies. my problem was with there being no evidence that Jesus actually was any of those things, not that scientology claims them to be true. i understand (and comprehend, wow) that the document you cited was from a court. i am simply amazed at what it cited that i didnt know about the "church" of scientology. i didnt know they were that wacked.

      am i perfectly clear this time?

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    35. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Funny

      He thinks he has a girlfriend, but in reality he is supporting a woman and her B.O.B.
      Frog blast the vent core!
    36. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by spun · · Score: 1

      It wasn't me that posted the original. And I knew that you meant that Jesus wasn't any of those things, but that was a stupid thing to say. You were saying the original poster had said that Jesus liked little boys, when a moment's perusal of the linked site would have shown you who had really said that. Sorry for the slap down, but you could have avoided it with ten seconds of due diligence. Next time, take the time to figure out what someone is actually saying before counter-attacking them.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    37. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by vikstar · · Score: 1

      LIES! ./ posters don't HAVE girlfriends! I dunno...my sister has religious paraphenalia that needs electricity. I know because when I am in another room, I can hear a buzzing sound in the bedroom and her chanting, "oh, god. oh, god! ohhhhh, gooood!"

      Obligatory fix.
      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    38. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by jrumney · · Score: 1

      sed to the rescue...

      s/when I am in another room/when I am browsing a webpage that is not slashdot/
      s/in the bedroom/in the bedroom that is being displayed on my monitor/

      Got it now?

    39. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your problem? The Fishman Affidavit is a court document, that's not a good enough cite for you that L. Ron Hubbard actually said that Jesus likes little boys? Or did you not bother to read (or not comprehend) the website and assumed the poster was bashing your favorite fairy tale? Yes, the Fishman Affidavit does exist. However there is some question whether it's actually a part of the OT-8 course.

      It is wholly inaccurate. I did OT8 in 1990, and NONE of this was part of it. Not the Jesus part, and not the whole "recalled process" part, which is, IMHO a "crock of shift". It looks to me like these are 2 DECOY texts to confuse the public. Tory can not be blamed for posting it, but I can vouch for its inaccuracies. --Michael Pattinson
      http://www.torymagoo.org/cosvm/ot8.htm
    40. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by DarkOx · · Score: 1
      I actally said something similar to a Scientologist once. It was something like this:

      My God is omnipotent, he needs no starship because he is the creator of the very heavens Xenu's ships fly around in that is if they exist.
      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    41. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by jenilyn · · Score: 1

      to boldly umlaut, where no man had umlauted before...

    42. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does she shop here http://mybelovedsgarden.net/?

    43. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      No... but some ARE married. Which makes sense... because after marriage sex becomes like a good steak: very rare.

    44. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by TheLink · · Score: 1

      His post to the Fishman Affidavit was a clear reply to the OP (possibly even informative to the OP), whereas your reply to him added little other than a thinly veiled personal attack.

      Not a surprise he responded to your attack in a less than charitable manner given that it was uncalled for.

      Now you're suggesting he should be the one to "take a sip of his coffee" and try to relax.

      If you really wanted people to be relaxed, maybe you should stop aggravating people, especially unnecessarily.

      --
    45. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Ah, that makes more sense.

      *gets out copy of the Simlarillion*

      Seems the Falas and Nevrast are part of Beleriand, but I'm not sure. As for Balar, it looks to be more to the south.

    46. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Star Trek 5 sucks worse than ST: Nemesis?

    47. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Informative

      homosexual pedophile

      the correct word here is "pederast", however, your words will do as some people wouldn't know what pederasty was unless they actually went and looked it up...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    48. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by TobyRush · · Score: 1

      Star Trek 5 sucks worse than ST: Nemesis?

      Well, at least Nemesis had Picard...

      *ducks*

      --
      Sam! If you will let me be,
      I will try them.
      You will see.
    49. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Dude, it sounds like you need to ditch that masturbating monkey and get yourself a real woman.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    50. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by tm2b · · Score: 1

      Frog blast the vent core!
      They're everywhere!
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    51. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to the reaction when the Religion of Peace (TM) discovers L Ron Hubbard claimed that Mad Mo invented it to get money during a time of poor trade.*

      * Yes, Hubbard actually had the gall to accuse someone else of starting a religion for profit.

      --
      If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    52. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by LeezardLvr · · Score: 1

      ...to correct boldly what no man had corrected before ;)

    53. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      We do not speak that name. That film is DEAD to us. YOU HEAR ME? DEAD!

      --
      -
    54. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your post is upside down. why the hell would you reply above the quote you're responding to? are you some sort of mouth breathing retard?

    55. Re:Head Shops & E-Meters by 74nova · · Score: 1

      i am genuinely sorry that nobody caught the fact that i was amazed that anyone could think those things about Jesus based on the fact that somebody said so. it seriously was not an attack on the poster, i promise :-) i expected the poster (and everyone else) to understand that i was (i think) siding with him about those ridiculous claims. my bad, everyone

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
  39. tag as "badsummary" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should be tagged as "badsummary".. TFA does not mention that anyone has access to the live DB in the sense of being able to issue SQL statements or so, just that ebay has decided to not moderate what scientology complains about. Of course that's bad enough, but it's not what the summary says.

  40. This is perfectly legal by arkham6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The government is not stopping sale of e-meters, and eBay, as a private vendor, can fully decide what and what not can be sold on their site. If they choose not to allow sale of e-meters, then thats their prerogative.

    The CoS is not doing anything illegal either, since they are acting now as an agent of E bay.

    But I think a much better question is, what did scientology do to eBay to get them to agree to this?

    1. Re:This is perfectly legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I think a much better question is, what did scientology do to eBay to get them to agree to this?

      I could show you but it wouldn't be a work safe link.

  41. Bart Simpson says YES by peter303 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    (His actor is a dedicated Scientologist.)

    1. Re:Bart Simpson says YES by EricWright · · Score: 1

      As a big Simpsons fan, I feel so dirty now.

    2. Re:Bart Simpson says YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How odd - I would've thought Ralph Wiggum a better likeness for those susceptible to cult brainwashing. ;)

  42. $3700 Wheatstone bridges? by Entropius · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, Co$ could probably be sued for false advertising.

    The name of the product is the "Mark VIII Super Quantum E-meter". A Wheatstone bridge, however, works on completely classical principles.

    Or maybe resistance is quantized, with one quantum of resistance being equal to the extra resistance from one extra thetan hanging around?

    1. Re:$3700 Wheatstone bridges? by linuxguy1454 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The current version of the E-meter known as the "Mark VIII Super Quantum E-meter" is a highly modified version of the 60's patented version. So no, you could not come close to it's functionality with that original patent's design, and it is not just a Wheatstone bridge. So a lawsuit on false advertising wouldn't succeed.

      Also, as a result of the fruitless '60-s investication of the CoS and it's E-meters by the IRS, the church had to add a disclaimer on all E-meters sold since then that the device in itself did nothing and was only to be used by trained or in-training Scientology ministers. Perhaps this is one reason that is motivating them to control the resale of used E-meters- so that they aren't accused of violating that '60s ruling by the IRS.

      That's my $.02

    2. Re:$3700 Wheatstone bridges? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe resistance is quantized, with one quantum of resistance being equal to the extra resistance from one extra thetan hanging around?

      In my own experiments with E-meters (purchased off E-bay of course), I've found that one quantum of resistance is equal to two thetans. If you have an even number of thetans, then add one, there's no change at all, but add one more onto that, and bam, it jumps up.

      Weird, I know. The universe is a mysterious place.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:$3700 Wheatstone bridges? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      How did they get that patent? Ohmmeters have been known for a long while -- or maybe it's the novel use of them to separate poor sods from their money?

    4. Re:$3700 Wheatstone bridges? by hughk · · Score: 1

      Forget the Ohmmeter, why not use a Megger instead. This is much better for 'testing' CoS bigots.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  43. Suicidal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's suicidal for any company to screw their real customers, who use, pay for their services over some third party, which is trying to establish some form of "censorship".

    eBay is big but there are more than enough auction sites to fill in for customers where they eBay fails to deliver for them.

  44. a bit misleading by qw0ntum · · Score: 3, Informative

    The summary and title are a bit misleading. The CoS is removing listings using the VeRO program, not getting "direct DB access" as is claimed. Still blatant abuse of the program, so their actions are definitely NOT defensible.

    Interestingly people who are targeted by this can file a DMCA counter claim and bring the issue into the court system. I hope this guy does that - maybe some of the CoS's practices can finally see the light of day.

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    1. Re:a bit misleading by sholden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not sure if scientologists are exactly the group I'd want ebay to "we can (and you authorize us to) disclose your User ID, name, street address, city, state, zip code, country, phone number, email, and company name to eBay VeRO Program participants as we in our sole discretion believe necessary or appropriate in connection with an investigation of fraud, intellectual property infringement, piracy, or other unlawful activity."

  45. Is it just me, or... by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is there rather a lot of anti-Scientology stuff here recently?

    Interestingly, I don't see a lot - make that *any* pro-posts either. Surely somewhere in the vast /. userbase there must be some of L. Ron's acolytes. Plenty of science and SciFci fans here.

    C'mon boys, stand up for your faith!

    Or is that forbidden too?

    1. Re:Is it just me, or... by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Well, since I just got trolled, I guess there ARE some L.Ron boys here after all!

      Thanks for the mature and detailed rebuttal, boys!

    2. Re:Is it just me, or... by spun · · Score: 1

      Science and sci-fi fans know LRH was the biggest piece of crap writer ever. Battlefield Earth? Come on.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Is it just me, or... by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Yup, not one of my faves. For a good mix of geek, scientist and writer, give me Pournelle any time. I still miss his old Byte 'Chaos Manor' column.

      Still, I'm disappointed by the response so far.
      My orginal post was lighthearted, and I was expecting 'flamebait' at the worst.

      It's not as if plenty of other faiths are not also based on weird beliefs or strange old (or more recent) texts - think Mormons for a start. The old testament has some heavy passages too...

      Yet attack the Christians, Jews, Muslims whatever here and you'll soon get some robust replies.

      Why the silence?

    4. Re:Is it just me, or... by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      I still miss his old Byte 'Chaos Manor' column.
      True. I was given a pre-release version of this post to test by a contact at the NSA. It proved to be so good that I've given the old post to my son, the starship captain, who in turn has given his old post to my other son, the xenoneurologist.

      I'd tell you how I managed to seamlessly integrate this new post with my older posts, but it seems I'm having some minor compatibility problems which has led to the new post obliterating all old posts at a quantum level. Still, I'm sure these minor issues will be ironed out by the time the post is released to Slashdot.

      Recommended.

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    5. Re:Is it just me, or... by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      You forgot - 'but I do this so that other people don't have to'

      Thanks for your post - brought back happy memories and made me laugh out loud.

      I'm off to the beach house with the 100 lb 'portable'.

    6. Re:Is it just me, or... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Well, the CoS and Slashdot aren't too friendly. Slashdot is proud of being censorship-free, but after someone posted Scientology's OT III text Scientology forced Slashdot to remove the post. You can tell from the tone (and the contents) of the article how Slashdot felt (and those who remember the incident still feel) about that.

      It's the typical reaction of someone who once was on the receiving end of Scientology's questionable legal action. Any Hubbardite would have a hard time posting here about their religion without being downmodded to hell.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    7. Re:Is it just me, or... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      You linked scientology to science fiction.

      It's unlikely you got a Troll mod for insulting scientologists.

      It's highly likely you got a Troll mod for insulting science fiction.

      At least science fiction is honest.
      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    8. Re:Is it just me, or... by prizm1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm a Scientologist and a Slashdot reader (who knew there could be such a thing?!). I generally just ignore these sorts of things, but as you say, there have been more of negative posts about my religion on here lately. I have to assume my post will go down in flames, but I figured that I might as well take a break from my usual lurker status here and make a few comments. The real story isn't sinister enough for a headline, as is usually the case with these things. As a few others have pointed out, the eBay VeRO program (no comment on that program itself) that is being used to take down e-meter auctions is actually an already established eBay program... It wasn't like "Scientology" was specially given 'direct access to eBay Database' (oh noes!!!!) as the headline claims. As for the e-meter, these are supposed to be for use only by Scientology ministers and ministers-in-training. Regardless of what you think of the e-meter or Scientology, what is happening here is a reasonable effort to protect that use legally. Of course there is no physical way to prevent every sale of a used e-meter to a non-minister, but eBay is a rather high-profile site where people sell used goods. It's quite a stretch to say this has anything to do with censorship, either. Time for the usual disclaimer of 'I am not a lawyer' and also another that I'm not involved in any of these actions officially, I just am commenting based on what I know and have observed. As an aside, I've always found it fascinating how some people will latch on to absolutely anything negative said about Scientology as proven fact and trounce anything positive. I also find it interesting how at least 90% (and I'm being generous here) of the stuff I have read online or in the media about Scientology doesn't even resemble what Scientology really is, and I have been a member for about 17 years now.

    9. Re:Is it just me, or... by risinganger · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the mature and detailed rebuttal, boys! Considering some the actions the CoS have been accused of do you really expect anything better? You should probably be grateful you haven't been kidnapped or harassed.
    10. Re:Is it just me, or... by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Thanks for taking the time to post an intelligent reply, and for the courage to post as yourself.
      As the saying goes, "I might not agree with what you say, but I defend your right to say it..."

    11. Re:Is it just me, or... by prizm1 · · Score: 1

      Bearhouse, thanks much for your civility and for actually taking the time to read my post and not respond predictably, as the other poster did. I'm always happy to talk about Scientology with someone who, though they may not agree with my religion, will at least respect my right to have it and not stomp all over it. Although I really don't shy away from those who do that, either, it's just somewhat futile. So, on that note...

      In response to the other poster, you have no need to be sorry for me, I can assure you. I won't be as presumptuous as you to return the sentiment, despite what my feelings may be on the matter. I find it rather audacious of you to assert that I will one day leave my church, since you don't know me and know barely anything about me. From your post, it's also pretty clear to me that you know very little of what Scientology really is and is about.

      I know and of course know of some people who have left Scientology, some after a short time, some after a long time. Big deal. Who ever said that Scientology is for everyone?

      Scientology at any and every level has nothing to do with worshiping anyone or anything or having faith. It is not dogmatic. Things purported across the inter-tubes to be 'beliefs' of Scientologists are absurd and honestly have nothing to do with what Scientologists believe. The mischaracterization of content that may or may not be on the OT levels and what these levels are about is rampant. But then, it's too easy to use the misnomer of 'secret teachings' and too appealing some peoples' sense of sophomoric humor to repeat falsehoods and gross mischaracterizations than to listen to the truth.

      Onto your statement that your real problem lies with the 'church'... this is a pretty broad statement and I can't know exactly what you are subscribing this to, but I know the ins and outs and all of the gory details to be able to makes some guesses. However, I know also from much personal experience that these things hold about as much weight as so much of the other BS I have read in my time. For one thing, I know that the highest ranking people in the management of the Church work tirelessly for their religion, and they certainly don't make much money doing it.

      (In my haste yesterday, I forgot to include the line breaks; sorry for the lack of readability there...)

  46. Under what legal authority? by PseudoLogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the "E-Meter" wikipedia link in the summary: "In 1958 when Scientologists Don Breeding and Joe Wallis developed a modified, smaller battery-operated version, which they presented to Hubbard, he again used it. This was christened the Hubbard electrometer. Hubbard patented it on December 6, 1966, as a "Device for Measuring and Indicating Changes in the Resistance of a Human Body" (U.S. Patent 3,290,589 ). The patent is now expired and in the public domain. The Church of Scientology continues to make, sell, and teach its use in auditing." So if the E-Meter is in the public domain, how can they control who resells them?

    --
    Insert witty comment here
  47. It's just CoS being CoS by realmolo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to the article, the Church of Scientology basically has no legal leg to stand on. Of course, who is going to take them to court? eBay surely doesn't care. And what about the people who are trying to buy used "e-meters"? Well, they are almost surely *Scientologists*! And we all know how the CoS feels about members that get out-of-line. I imagine that if the CoS *ever* caught one of their members buying a used e-meter, they'd make their lives hell.

    . So, really, no harm done all-around, I say.

    1. Re:It's just CoS being CoS by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      And what about the people who are trying to buy used "e-meters"? Well, they are almost surely *Scientologists*! There were a couple of classic meters that could qualify as a museum piece.
      I mean let's be fair, Scientology was promoted as philosophy for the atomic age, and that retro 50s chrome style is well, 50 years old. Not an antique yet but certainly an icon for the time period.

      I'd buy one. I am not a Scientologist.

      Also you have Free Zone, those who believe in Hubbard's tech but broke away after Hubbard died IIRC. While you or I might call them Scientologists, I think that's a trademark.
      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  48. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is important and it is relevant to the main story, because Co$ victims are often first thought to have committed suicide. There is a direct link between the main story and this news. Co$ is a dangerous cult.

    1. Re:mod parent up by initialE · · Score: 1

      Anonymous isn't anonymous for no reason. And they don't wear V masks because they think it's cool. Well, maybe a bit cool. Another thing I want to say is that you'd have to think long and hard before stopping an organization from putting roadblocks to the spread of it's ideas, (like say, through merchandise). Sure it's wrong that they're blocking the resale, but does it really hurt you more than it hurts them?

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    2. Re:mod parent up by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, isn't it possible that there is a correlation between the type of people that join cults and the type of people that commit suicide? Low self-esteem, not very bright, not much going for them in their lives...

    3. Re:mod parent up by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      He didn't ever join scientology.

      I do find it odd that'd you put up a hose between car and house, turn on the car, enter the house, and wait *there* to die, rather than just piping the exhaust into the car and sit there for a few minutes.

    4. Re:mod parent up by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      Supposedly he put a pipe from his car to the window of his house in the middle of the night and died of the fumes by noon the next day.

      That seems abundantly open to suspicions of foul play. I'd be checking for CCTV in the area (but I live in the UK so there's a good chance you'll find some).

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  49. Well as far by Vexor · · Score: 1

    as access to eBay goes. I think this would be a great step for online games companies (ie Blizzard, Funcom, Sony) to stop RMT for their digital products. Granted much of the market is on individual company sites and not eBay but I see character auctions for MMOs listed there fairly often. For the CoS: My religion thinks item _____ is bad *auction deleted*

    --
    ~Vexed and loving it!
  50. E-meter like a condom by cgfsd · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would equate an E-meter to that of a condom. Two things you would never want to buy used and two things used for screwing people.

    1. Re:E-meter like a condom by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      A preservative fulfills its stated purpose, assuming it is not defective. That's the prime difference right there.

  51. Gee.... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

    Will this set a precedent for other companies that want to stop the aftermarket resale of their products?

    Do you think? Wouldn't Cisco, or Adobe love to crack down on the grey-market resale of old versions of their products? Talk about taking asinine to a whole new level...

    --
    Who did what now?
  52. CoS is nutty, but by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    this isn't a Big Deal.

    http://pages.ebay.in/help/confidence/programs-vero.html

    Any person or company who holds intellectual property rights (such as a copyright, trademark or patent) which may be infringed upon by eBay postings or items listed on eBay is encouraged to become a VeRO Program member. Program members presently include hundreds of individuals, local law enforcement, and intellectual property owners from a wide array of industries. Yeah, I know, India. I'm pretty sure it applies to the .com, too. ;)
    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    1. Re:CoS is nutty, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the patent has expired please explain how copyright, trademark or patent applies.

    2. Re:CoS is nutty, but by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

      Since the patent has expired please explain how copyright, trademark or patent applies. You're asking the wrong person. I got the information from eBay. If you've got a problem with eBay's policy, talk to them - not me. :)
      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    3. Re:CoS is nutty, but by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      I'd guess trademark applies to the words "e-meter" "electrometer" or "Church of Scientology"

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  53. Holy crap NO by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given Scientology's record of fraud and abuse, should eBay give them this level of trust?

    The answer is right there. Would you want any group with Scientology's record of fraud and abuse to have access to anything important?

    What do you want to bet they'd pull auctions of other Scientology-questionable stuff that isn't e meters?

    Put a DVD copy of Anonymous' Scientology protests up for sale and watch what happens. What do you want to bet that it winds up deleted? Blocking e meter sales my ass - this is nothing more than some goofy cult making decisions about what you're allowed to buy. Don't let it happen!

    These people are batshit fucking insane. Don't legitimize them by giving them any sort of power, control, or authority whatsoever.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Holy crap NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These people are batshit fucking insane. Meh, I don't think they're insane, just good at selling random stuff to stupid people. At least they're not as crazy as these people for instance
    2. Re:Holy crap NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given you can get the anon vids for free off youtube, I imagine they will be more likely to do stuff like pull books on psychiatry as well as books critical of them, such as the latest book on Cruise.

  54. So if these items migrate to Craigslist.... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... What are the odds that these jokers will try to pull the same stunt? Perhaps that's the answer?

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  55. Most important reason: by WolfTheWerewolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... so the CoS can get the name and address of the auction lister, then Fair Game them as they see fit.
    According to eBay's VeRO ToS they will gladly hand this information over.

  56. Perjury is a criminal offense by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Even if E-Bay goes along with this, perjury is a criminal offense. The prosecutor in the county where the perjury happened can go after these people with a very large clue-stick.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  57. eBay changes search for "emeter" into "exeter" by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's wacky. Try it yourself...
    In the search box type (without quotes) "emeter". If you type it with the quotes, that's different.
    What happens? You perform a search for "exeter"!

    I'm sure it isn't anything sinister, though. A search for "cimputer" is changed into a search for "computer". But it sure is confusing.

    1. Re:eBay changes search for "emeter" into "exeter" by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      And when I was trying to find a volume of Elfen Lied, it kept suggesting that maybe I meant Ellen! Damn, she gets a talk show, and now she thinks she owns the world!

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:eBay changes search for "emeter" into "exeter" by Animats · · Score: 1

      Google started doing that about six months ago. They used to just put up a warning message, "Did you mean 'exter'?" But now they just go ahead and search for the common misspelling.

      For example, today try to search Google News for "Baer", which is in the news because Bank Junius Baer is trying to shut down Wikileaks. Google will search for "bar". You can search for 'baer -bar' to get the correct results, but that's not obvious.

  58. Bye eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This plus the recent fee increases and feedback changes ensure that I will not be using ebay unless they change their policies. I hope I'm not alone.

  59. And another thing by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    This is to stop members from buying used units from ex-members instead of buying from the official (and very expensive) source.

    How exactly is this illegal?

    Why should eBay even fucking care?

    This sets a lousy precedent. What if the RIAA decides that used CDs are too cheap and asks for the same, for instance? Or Ford decides that used cars are damaging their sales so you're not allowed to sell them? Or Levis decides that their jeans last too long, so you're not allowed to resell them?

    This is *seriously* bad news.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:And another thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How exactly is this illegal?



      Doctrine of First Sale
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_sale
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-sale_doctrine_(patent)

      This is like Ford saying you can't resell your used Mustang.

  60. Competitor by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

    Does ebay have any real competitors? Gunbroker doesn't really count.

    When a company starts getting abusive with what it does, it may be best to go elsewhere.

    --
    Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
  61. Oh well by Protonk · · Score: 2, Funny

    It isn't censorship. It isn't illegal. It is totally within the scope of eBay's user agreements with sellers and buyers. eBay has negotiated an agreement with a large vendor who is interested in preventing the resale of their items. I HAVE to presume that whatever these items are they come with an agreement eliminating the possiblity of resale. They would then fall in to the category of attempting to resell items which have a non-transferrable license. It is totally within their rights to cancel any auction that they feel is outside their TOS. In this case, they have chosen to offload the work on to a more zealous party.

    Just because it is withing their rights doesn't make it a good idea. As a matter of fact, it is a terrible idea. allowing a third party to void auctions without oversight is foolish for a few reasons:

    1. Other large interests see these actions and will want the same treatment, as long as it does not offer significant negative publicity. The fact that ebay is WILLING to offer this service puts them in a bad barganing position with these other firms.

    2. It only means lost revenue for ebay. Presumably, ebay was faced with a legal threat over allowing resale of these items. SOMEHOW, ebay made the determination that compliance was somehow too expensive and have offered to shift the cost of compliance to CoS. CoS does NOT have an incentive to be careful. They have an incentive to overextend their authority because the lost customer is not theirs.

    3. As a corollary, this is like outsourcing your customer service to a motorcycle gang. CoS has every reason to be pernicious, litigious and overbroad. They have NO reason to see gray areas and offer the benefit of the doubt.

    4. Compliance in good faith by ebay would probably not have hazarded a lawsuit. IANAL, but most of these suits stem from what is basically deliberate negligence on the part of the reselling authority (or serving authority). If ebay acts on their own standards they are likely to meet whatever tests exist.

  62. Who cares? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If someone is drinking the Scientology Kool Aid, then does it really matter whether or not they get discounted second hand equipment? If Scientology has their hooks into you they will get your money one way or another.

    What they're really trying to control is the purchase of scientology collectables by non-scientologists.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Who cares? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      That may be part of it, but there's also the fact that $cientology is simply a more hokey-religious version of the Amway model. Having el-cheapo second e-meters being sold means that the Church doesn't get a cut.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Who cares? by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

      From the churches perspective, the vast majority of people selling their emeters on ebay would be ex-scientologists who have left the church, and the people buying them would freezoners (aka squirrels) who practice scientology outside of the control of the church.

      The church sees things in terms of "you are either with us or against us", and the at the head of the church RTC is there to protect the purity of the application of scientology auditing technology. The only reason someone doesn't want to be under the supervision of RTC must be because they want to pervert the tech, this is considered a high-crime and must be stamped out.

      As a side note, E-Meters (at the Mark VII's) need to be sent back to Flag (in Clearwater, Florida) for a paid servicing once in a while (every year or couple of years), they even have a date on the back and you are not allowed to use them for offical scientology auditing if they are out-of-date.

  63. Completely Misleading by Kashra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course, another completely misleading headline and article summary.

    The VeRO program does not provide direct access to eBay's database to delete items. It is a fast-track for manufacturers to submit deletion requests for items they believe are infringing on their copyrights. Every time an auction is deleted, the VeRO program gives eBay the proper documents holding the manufacturers legally responsible for their claim of copyright infringement.

    Taking a simple look at the program's description reveals that ANY auction being deleted through this program can be reinstated, automatically, by the user, within 10 days. They simply have to do the same thing the manufacturer did: claim legal responsibility for their auction, in writing.

    Now, there's no doubt that I, as a private individual, would never risk challenging the very well funded battery of lawyers the Church of Scientology has to keep me in line. Even though I know they have no leg to stand on, I can't afford the legal battle. But I wouldn't cry that its eBay's fault, when eBay gave me the option to directly challenge the "manufacturer".

    --
    If you can't find a real troll, just mod down whoever you don't agree with!
    1. Re:Completely Misleading by touretzky · · Score: 4, Informative

      eBay's counternotification policy for VeRO takedowns applies only to claims of copyright infringement. (Read the page you linked to.) Scientology is using bogus trademark infringement claims to take down E-meter listings. Therefore, counternotification is not available.

    2. Re:Completely Misleading by Kashra · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt this semantic issue is actually a roadblock to submitting the counternotification. The language, as I read it, suggests that the counternotification form is used for any VeRO takedowns in which the auctioner cannot reach a settlement with the IP holder. So long as the auctioner is willing to take responsibility, in writing, the auction will return.

      --
      If you can't find a real troll, just mod down whoever you don't agree with!
    3. Re:Completely Misleading by touretzky · · Score: 1
      eBay's wording is perfectly clear:


      For listings that have been removed at the request of the rights owner for copyright infringement, you may have the option of filing a Counter Notice with eBay ... A Counter Notice is a form provided by eBay in compliance with the requirements of the federal Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

      What part of "for copyright infringement" did you not understand? Also, if you have read the DMCA, you would know that it applies only to copyright issues, and cannot be used to gain safe harbor in trademark, trade secret, or patent cases.

      Another problem with counternotification is that it requires the person to disclose their true identity, including an address where they can be served with legal papers, and it requires them to agree to be subject to the jurisdiction of US federal courts. That is one reason why Andreas Heldal-Lund, the owner of Operation Clambake and a citizen of Norway, does not use counternotification.
    4. Re:Completely Misleading by Kashra · · Score: 1

      Instead of nitpicking wording in a summary site that was obviously intended to be informational, not legalese, how about you instead come up with an example of someone who was disallowed counternotification because the VeRO takedown was due to "trademark" instead of "copyright"? You probably won't find any, because you're grasping for straws to justify your righteous indignation.

      There is no problem with counternotification requiring the person to disclose identity and submit to judicial process. eBay is a US compan and subject to US laws. If you're from Norway and want to use it, deal with it, or use a Norwegian auction house. When someone has their auction removed via VeRO, it means there's an entity out there that has filed -their half- of the legal documentation to challenge the right of the auction to exist. The only proper response, if you really believe you're right, is to file -your half- of the papers, or go cry in a corner about how unfair it is that people have laws and you have to abide by them.

      --
      If you can't find a real troll, just mod down whoever you don't agree with!
  64. yes of course it is by Quadraginta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    E-Bay is private firm, and they're free to list or not list sales on their site for any reason whatsoever, including because the "Church" of Scientology asserts some utterly bogus intellectual property right, or because they just feel like it.

    The C of S is not "preventing the resale of their product," they're just preventing the resale through E-Bay and with E-Bay's cooperation. You can still put an ad in the paper and sell it, or put up a notice in your neighborhood market, or just walk around town with a sign attached to you saying "E-Meter Cheap!"

    And who gives a shit what the lawyers think? Why should the law be relevant here? This isn't a question you want the lawyers thinking about, because you can be damn sure that any solution they think up is going to cost you far more in cash and personal liberty than you would like to part with. Do you want there to be a law telling you what you can and cannot sell on your personal website? Do you want to have to get your Craigslist ad vetted by the police before it can go up? Do you want the FBI to have the right to interrogate you about whether you sold your pet cat or unused furniture to the right people, and in the right way?

    Christ, let us keep the lawyers in the fridge, OK? If there's a big market for secondhand E-meters, and E-Bay foolishly foregoes it because they want to keep the Scientologists happy, then let someone start up a private website devoted to reselling E-Meters, and he will make scads of money, more than enough to dare the "Church" to sue him, and get their clueless clock cleaned and get hit for beaucoup lawyer fees on top of it.

    But what I suspect is that ex-Scientologists who want to recoup some of the financial loss associated with their recent vacation from rationality are a very small group, and while it kinda sucks that when there's very few of you and a whole lot of someone else (in this case, non-ex-Scientologists, or pre-ex-Scientologists), you have to tread carefully, that's just life in a wide-open democracy. It's not like an intelligent and determined person can't work around this problem fairly easily. I'm sure if I had an E-Meter to sell, I could do it easily enough without E-Bay or the Church getting a clue. Probably my 16-year-old could, too.

    1. Re:yes of course it is by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      I am utterly baffled by this. Wiccans can list "magic" wands. Parapsychologist can list EMF meters for finding ghosts (i.e. radio towers) etc. But since when could one's beliefs be used as grounds to stop a free market? It is just silly. How far would I get if I claimed to be an angry Wiccan upset with other wand sellers? It looks to me like grounds for a religious discrimination lawsuit. As I understand it, that has been Scientology's tactic.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    2. Re:yes of course it is by croddy · · Score: 1

      You are correct. eBay has the right to choose whether or not they grant the Scientology organization carte blanche over their database. And any conscientious user should recognize that eBay made the wrong choice. Anyone that gets in bed with Scientology does not deserve a dime of my business.

    3. Re:yes of course it is by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. There is no such thing as a "religious discrimination suit" except in very narrow circumstances directly related to your employment, courtesy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, e.g. you can't be fired from your job serving popcorn at the local movieplex just because you're a Jew. (There are some other grounds related to your right to buy a house and get a mortgage, too, provided the seller or mortgage broker meets certain arcane grounds related to whether the Commerce Clause even in the Burger Court's active imagination can be stretched to apply.)

      But you have gravely mistaken the First Amendment (the one about religious freedom) if you think it protects you from hostility from your fellow private citizens (or private firms) based on your religion. E-Bay is free to think well of Scientologists and decline to do business with their detractors, just as you are free to decline to buy stuff from a store run by rabid evangelicals who insist on giving you a lecture about letting Jesus into your life before they'll count out your change.

      That's the nature of a free and liberal society. We don't ask the government to protect us all the time and in all ways from the opinions -- even the prejudiced, illiberal, dumfuk opinions -- of our fellow citizens, because we are smart enough to realize that the only way it can do so is to take away everybody's liberty. If you want absolute protection from being persecuted by the government for having the "wrong" religious attitudes, then you have to extend the exact same right and privilege to everybody else, including the management of E-Bay.

    4. Re:yes of course it is by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Well, if you say so. You're putting a pretty big premium on the behaviour of a vendor towards some tiny group of sufferers (ex-Scientologists vending E-Meters for profit). I mean, do you apply the same thorough ethical vetting to everyone who offers to sell you stuff? You won't by gas from the corner grocery because the owner verbally abused his wife before she left him? Or his kid is in jail for car theft?

      Are you quite sure injecting all this moral judgmentalism into a simple commercial transaction is a good idea? Isn't that the kind of thing people get pissed off about when it comes to crazed right-wing Christian evangelicals, who won't buy a car unless the dealer has been born again?

      I'm not saying you're wrong -- you have the right to buy from whom you choose, and the right to apply any criteria you wish to the seller. I'm just asking whether you've fully thought this through. Either you're going to have to ask an awful lot of rather personal moral questions about the people selling you stuff -- doing your share to see us moving towards a theocracy where issues of morals and beliefs pervade every aspect of social life -- or you're going to be hypocritically inconsistent, applying the moral test when the evidence of misbehaviour is brought to your attention (as here) and otherwise letting sleeping dogs lie. That just encourages people to lie and cover up, you know.

    5. Re:yes of course it is by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      O.K. I was being a little hyperbolic. My point was I doubt Ebay could make a compelling argument for this in the court of public opinion. While they are not an employer of the sellers the legislative courts have had great difficulty interpreting cases involving networking technology. I wouldn't put it past one.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    6. Re:yes of course it is by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      I doubt Ebay could make a compelling argument for this in the court of public opinion.

      I'm sure you're right about that, and that's the proper place to try the issue.

      That said, the unfortunate aspect of the court of public opinion is that it's only available to people who are very sympathetic victims (poor single crippled mothers, whatever) and who have some kind of megaphone to get their story out. It's rough justice, but hardly equal justice.

    7. Re:yes of course it is by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      It seems to me /. is an effective megaphone. To the extent that people are aware of the issue, I don't think people like Ebay's decision (assuming the information presented here is correct and I think it is). I don't think it is fair in the sense one person or a very few can define the acceptable beliefs of others. That said, I know my personal belief system is not a majority so I have some empathy in that respect. I would never presume to speak for others who I felt might hold similar beliefs though. I should add I sell items on Ebay and intend to continue to do so but that is largely due to financial necessity.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    8. Re:yes of course it is by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is fair in the sense one person or a very few can define the acceptable beliefs of others.

      Fair enough. Where I might extend this, which is just a vague sympathy for democracy, is that I also believe a very large number of people, even an overwhelming majority, should not be able to define the acceptable beliefs of a very few people, or of even just one.

      I should add I sell items on Ebay and intend to continue to do so but that is largely due to financial necessity.

      On the other hand, I don't use E-Bay at all, so I could "boycott" them at zero personal cost. However, I defend their right to engage in behaviour the majority (including me) find obnoxious because I don't want that same majority to have the right to judge my behaviour at some later date. Liberty is a funny thing; if you don't defend the liberty of others even when they use it in a way you find personally repugnant, it kind of dries up and evaporates after a while. There are always too many people around who (1) don't mind being told what to do, or (2) like the idea of telling other people what to do. It takes eternal vigilance on the part of lone wolves to preserve a little space to exist apart from the sheep and the shepherds.

    9. Re:yes of course it is by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      That sounds very Libertarian. It sounds good but is difficult to implement. I wish I could be more pity but I have a bad cold and I am zonked with Nyquil. I better stop before I start talking about... about...

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    10. Re:yes of course it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy and sell emeters at freezoneauctions.com

      They will not cower under the Cof$ wrath.

      you don't need eBay.

      Dark Angel

    11. Re:yes of course it is by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, or rather "liberal" if you want to reach back to the original meaning of the word ("live and let live"), before the wretched collectivists stole it and turned its meaning upside down, 1984 style, so that now it tends to mean "having the Correct Nice Thoughts."

      I don't think it's any harder to implement than any other Golden-Rule based philosophy. Just ask yourself every time you open your trap to propose that your fellow citizen be forced to do something he doesn't want to do: Am I OK if that same principle is applied to me? It's certainly a lot easier than working out the One True Moral Code on which everyone agrees, which you need if you want to apply the force of law to practically every private transaction.

      You are encountering the most successful virus on the planet! Pity we can't yet engineer like that.

    12. Re:yes of course it is by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      I think everyone is a little bit Libertarian after a dose of Nyquil so it is not that hard to do (it seemed so at the time). I am better now.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  65. Well, I just altered my auctions... by JoshDM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    they now reference the words "e-meter" and "Scientology". That should drive some sales and page views.

  66. We call it by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

    Voight-Kampff for short,

    You insensitive cloud!

  67. limits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a limit to what this gives them the right to remove, or do they have carte blanche on anything, or anything Scientology related?

    IE. are we about to see a stark decrease in ebay trade on anti-Scientology books.

    Or will it be a more general thing such as you will no longer find videos that can be applied to many religions, and businesses, some obviously more than others, that do not directly, or even indirectly suggest anything about the CoS, such as 'mind control cults' in homebrew VHS/VCD/DVD form. (if only AOL CD's could be recycled into VCD's and redistributed, it would finally be such an admirable use for them ;) )

    I'm posting A/C, as long ago I recognized the Co$ as a terrorist organization, this realization came about when I decided I was too scared of them attacking my physical, mental and financial well being to post anything about them without anonymity. This is purely subjective, and opinion, and therefore not actionable.

    1. Re:limits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On a related note to OP's last paragraph : "Scourge of Scientology dies in apparent suicide" this weekend

      Payne said that he last spoke to Lonsdale two months ago, and that Lonsdale had found steady work on the night shift at a local company, stocking shelves. He talked about going back to school and getting a private investigator's license. "He was getting on with his life," Payne said. "He had every reason to live."
  68. Nothing new from Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Really, this just the latest in a long line of Ebay shirking their duty to actually police their own system. The fact that it's Scientology doing the policing is what brought this to light. Between the VeRO program and the difficulty in reporting fraudulent auctions within the site, it's obvious that Ebay doesn't give two shiny pennies about the validity of auctions. All they care about is that people sell -something- on ebay, so they can get their percentage. It's why they bought Paypal, and then made it against the rules to use other checkout systems. It's why you routinely see knockoff, non-functional, and straight out scam auctions on Ebay constantly. Have you ever tried to CALL ebay, or Paypal? Good luck! I worked for a salvage company with over 23,000 positive feedback, and we had to argue constantly to keep paypal from charging us back, or ebay from cancelling valid auctions. At the same time I typically spent 2-3 hours a week seeking out and reporting false auctions that were duping our pics and descriptions- only perhaps half of them ever got cancelled.

    What it comes down to is that if Ebay doesn't expand it's personell enough to adequately monitor auctions, or start using some sort of peer-review system, people will go elsewhere.

    I don't buy from ebay unless it's the only source for what i need, and i never use paypal. Don't use paypal attached to your main bank account EVER, paypal has the ability to drain the account dry with no reason, and little recourse. Scary.

    posted anonymously to keep you from stalking me on ebay ;)

  69. Scientology vs. Psychiatry by oldhack · · Score: 1

    On the one hand, Scientology is money-sucking voodoo fraud. On the other hand, psychiatry makes up diseases and make money selling legalized dopes - a money-sucking voodoo fraud. Can't these two collide and annihilate each other a la matter-antimatter? Ok, ok, I'm sure there are good bits to psychiatry that can maybe thrown in neuroscience, but you can probably say the same for Scientology?

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  70. I hope that's just blustering... by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Funny

    [L]ast I tried a DOS on eBay for fucking with my mother's account, it only took a mere 5,000 simulataneous requests every ten seconds to DOS them. Err, did you forget to click the Post Anonymously checkbox before admitting to an act which may carry civil and/or criminal penalties?
    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:I hope that's just blustering... by Khyber · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, I just don't give a fuck. What's the law going to do? I just opened 5,000 various auctions in my Firefox browser and set them to auto-refresh at the same time. The fact that their servers couldn't stand up to a simulation of 5,000 people clicking 'refresh' at the same time doesn't constitute a violation of law. The key word in the sentence is 'TRIED' not 'successfully carried out'

      The law's tried it before anyways. I run rings around them every time, simpyly because most judges aren't smart enough to know what they're trying to charge me for.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:I hope that's just blustering... by dissolved · · Score: 1

      so... blustering then.

    3. Re:I hope that's just blustering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously he hijacked someone's Slashdot account to make that post!

  71. Suicide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Am I paranoid to think that Scientology had a role in it? Even if it was nothing more than driving him to it...

    The sick thing? I'm certain that, even if they had nothing to do with it, Scientologists will chalk this up as a "win" ...

  72. church by genican1 · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that these guys are no longer even resembling a church. They're nothing but a business.

    1. Re:Church by FiloEleven · · Score: 4, Informative

      What *I* really don't get is why people don't just call Scientology for what it is: a sect. Most likely because it isn't a sect; it's a cult. At least, it has more characteristics of a cult than a sect. Sects are groups of people with a certain set of beliefs that have broken off from a parent religion (or cult). Scientology never had a parent, so the term "sect" is a misnomer. Its practices (strict control of its members and its secrecy being the most apparent) closely match those associated with cults. The biggest difference between scientology and your run-of-the-mill cult is its massive size and influence, which is large enough to cause colleges nationwide to rename a class from something like "A Study of Cults" to something like "New Religious Movements" for fear of lawsuits.
    2. Re:Church by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A sect? I consider them organized crime.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:Church by enjerth · · Score: 1

      Insisting that they are a Church really isn't fair to the other religions humanity knows. Nevermind they use a name with "church" in it (not in Israel..!). AFAIK Scientology is a company run by greedy, manipulative lunatics for sheer profit. I have to ask, when was the last time you went to church? And when was the last time you saw a TV evangelist?

      That sounds quite a bit like some churches I've gone to. And seen on TV.
    4. Re:Church by emilper · · Score: 5, Funny

      no, it's a sect, a split from the Church of "Astounding Stories".

    5. Re:Church by odoketa · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, it is outlawed as a sect in at least one european country (Germany)

    6. Re:Church by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I want to know about Christianity, I can buy a Bible. I could even get free bibles if I know where to look. I could find a million different people preaching about the religion. I could find people who would be head over heals to go in depth about their beliefs for absolutley no money. I could sell a Bible on eBay and the pope isn't going to delete it. On the other hand, Scientology offers nothing except a promise of enlightment for a large sum of money. They don't follow through and have so much against them legally and morally that it is sophomoric to compare them to a real religion. Say what you want about religion, but a true religion is open (like most major religions) and a cult is closed (like Scientology). Taking jabs at mainstream religion is childish and ignores the real issues. And finally, Christianity's largest atrocities occured centuries ago, the stuff Scientology has done is completely out of place for the 20th and 21st century. I'm not trying to defend Christianity out of zealotry (I do not practice Christianity or Judaism, the two religions of my parents, although I do believe in God), I'm defending it because in this day and age it is a respectful religion to follow and one that isn't based around money, crime and tax breaks. Sure, one may not agree with some views but those views are open book. Scientology won't tell you their views because they are idiotic. All the stuff we know about Xenu is from leaks. Scientology never volunteered that information, and for a good reason. Until you are brainwashed, it sounds like pure BS.

    7. Re:Church by un1xl0ser · · Score: 0

      That's fucking great. :-) Mod parent up.

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    8. Re:Church by slashdotwannabe · · Score: 1

      >> What *I* really don't get is why people don't just call Scientology for what it is: a sect. That way people who never
      >> heard of them will be better prepared when meeting a recruiting member and on guard.

      Isn't the difference between a sect and a religion pretty much the quality of your backstory? As they go, those CoS nutjobs... err... folks have one better than most other sects. It's got drama, action and intrigue... who ever said L. Ron was a crappy writer?

      quality of backstory += number of belivers += perceived legitmacy

      --
      This comment is my opinion and does not represent an official position of Donald Trump or others I do not work for
    9. Re:Church by martinX · · Score: 1

      A cult is the church down the road from your church.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    10. Re:Church by Bombur · · Score: 1

      OR he is German like myself and has fallen for a pair of "false friends", words sounding similar in English and German, but meaning diffferent things. The German word for "cult" would be "Sekte", wich could account for such a mistake. Much more often cited by English teachers is the difference between "become" and the German "bekommen", wich would translate to "get", whereas "come" and "kommen" are the same.

    11. Re:Church by 2short · · Score: 1


      And while the serious atrocities committed in the name of Christianity were mostly a while ago, they were also a heck of a lot more serious than anything Scientology has achieved (not because Scientology is nice, but because it doesn't control any Countries yet).

      Frankly, unless you start out believing it, the Christianity stuff sounds like pure BS too. Christianity just has a big enough critical mass that a large population actually is brought up believing it.

      Do note that when you look at the practical end result; the actual ways to behave toward ones fellow human beings that many Christians get out of their religion, it's great: they're nice people, and thus drawn to traditions that tell them it's good to be nice. Performing the same analysis on Scientology yields considerably more troubling and scary results.

      But it's not because their ideas are any less weird. They both believe wacky things that can be used to justify whatever behavior you want.

    12. Re:Church by emilper · · Score: 1

      great :-( ... thanks for attracting their attention ... now they're going to send the flying polyps after me.

    13. Re:Church by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      Well keep in mind, as well that the major atrocities commited by the church were at a time when the Bible was in Latin and people couldn't read for the most part. Thus, it was a dark age of the religion because the word wasn't being spread. Nowadays, we don't have Christians doing that type of thing because you read the Bible or have it read and explained to you. The religion holds no secrets. This isn't a debate of whose beliefs are better. It's a debate of what makes a cult different from religion. Finally, something that is less empirical but holds true is that a religion, such as Christianity, is followed by true believers and led by them too. Somehow I doubt the leaders of Scienotology believe what they preach. This of course isn't proof per se, but assuming you subscribe to that line of thought already, it's just another way to justify the difference.

    14. Re:Church by 2short · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but even if you read the Bible yourself (and believe it contains some thing higher that an assortment of random stories and prejudices from iron age nomads), you've still got to decide for yourself whether to concentrate on the bits about "Love thy neighbor" bits or the bits about killing everyone in the enemy city, even the babies.

      "Somehow I doubt the leaders of Scienotology believe what they preach."

      Unclear. Regarding the original leaders, I'm inclined to agree with you; but such a top core of people who understand it's a scam must necessarily be a very small group, and they've been dying off. So as time goes on one expects more leaders will be drawn from actual believers. On the other hand, I'm not convinced very many followers of mainstream religions really believe all the wacky stuff they're supposed to.

      But frankly, trying to distinguish cult/religion by such criteria strikes me as academic and ultimately pointless. By my reckoning, there's no fundamental difference. They all believe absurdities. But I try not to judge people too harshly just on that basis, because most of the world believes one absurd thing or another. I try to judge them by what they do. As it was put, um, *somewhere*, "You shall know them by their works"...

        When Christians do good things and give the credit to God, I fault them for excessive humility. This is uniquely easy to forgive.

          When people try to tell me how to live my life, or take money from the vulnerable, etc. I don't much care what stupid idea inspired them.

    15. Re:Church by douglaid · · Score: 1

      A sect is a sect of something. Scientology is one man claiming he has all the answers. I suffer from inherited depression. Scientology claims it has the answer to depression - but it is in the book, and I have to buy the book. I have seen enough cock-and-bull answers already to believe in it. The most recent is somebody who guarantees interpreting my own dreams (I don't have any) - if I buy the book. I know a fundraising motive when I see one.

      Here in Australia, we had a troublesome reactionary politician. According to our then P.M., our Pacific neighbours suggested he take her out and shoot her. He replied that we don't do it that way here. If a country with those values on free speech has to ban something, it must be pretty evil.

  73. Microsoft vs. the Church of Scientology by touretzky · · Score: 4, Funny

    Q: What's the difference between Microsoft and the Church of Scientology?

    A: One is a wealthy and powerful criminal enterprise bent on world domination, while the other, ah, ummm.... Microsoft has better health benefits.

    1. Re:Microsoft vs. the Church of Scientology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, I am pretty sure Microsoft has never starved anyone, then sued the coroner for slander until she ruled the death was an accident (google lisa McPherson), or launched an attack against mental health organizations to discredit them in the eyes of their employees

      Psychiatrists did the holocaust!!! (seriously,watch the BBC Panorama on Scientology, they believe that, they claim it, PUBLICLY)

    2. Re:Microsoft vs. the Church of Scientology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't even bother. you're dealing with the irrational slashdot crowd. for as much as they bash scientology what you have here is little more than another cult of lemmings.

    3. Re:Microsoft vs. the Church of Scientology by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i never worked for MS but i bet they don't starve you to death and let insect bite you as you die.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  74. Hill v. Scientology by debrain · · Score: 1

    As an interesting anecdote regarding the Church of Scientology, there is an interesting Supreme Court of Canada case (Hill v. Scientology) which was the largest punitive damages award ever given out in Canada, and which case now literally defines "punitive damages" in the Canadian legal context.

    1. Re:Hill v. Scientology by oldhack · · Score: 1

      I clicked the link you provided, but can't read through it all. Help out an ADD brother: which party was awarded how much damage? Has it been enforced?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:Hill v. Scientology by debrain · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I clicked the link you provided, but can't read through it all. Help out an ADD brother: which party was awarded how much damage? Has it been enforced? Summary:
      A lawyer working for the Church of Scientology stood on the steps of a courthouse in fancy lawyer gowns and said they were going to commence a criminal contempt proceeding against a Crown (State) attorney. This violated the ethical guidelines of the lawyer, threatened an officer of the State, and impugned the credibility of that officer and of the judicial system itself.

      The attorney and CoS were fined $300,000 each, and CoS $500,000 in aggravated damages and $800,000 in punitive damages.

      I would presume this has been enforced. The CoS is still operating just down the street from where I work.

  75. C-List by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    In other news, Craigslist sez "Bring on the E-Meters!"

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  76. emeterbay.com by DirtyHerring · · Score: 1

    ...is available.

    Just mentioning it.

  77. i thought this happened to my ebay account by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    but when i asked ebay to audit my account, they just laughed at me. why?

    oh well, i guess there's just no market out there for thimble sized fine porcelain body thetans

    *sigh*

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  78. Mass protest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So listing fees for $1 auctions are cheap enough that I would happily put up some listings for them to delete. Lets see how busy we can make them?

    Anyone got a photo I can use?

  79. AAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!!!! by Teflon_Jeff · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, I need to delete my Ebay account.

    Okay, I'm back. No way, who's to say they aren't pulling the personal information of the resellers, and using that information for more nefarious purposes, ranging from lawsuits to harassment. Not to mention what other sensitive information they may try to obtain.

    --
    "Teach a man to build a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."
  80. CL makes it even easier for the COS by xC0000005 · · Score: 1

    All they need is some dedicated flaggers. And face it, anyone who is willing to stand outside handing out personality tests is willing to sit on their rear and click "scam". I recommend auctioning material on Scatentology. It's Scientology crazy but free. As a matter of fact, I think I'll list an auction for Scatentology secrets and an F-Meter (a seashell. You hold it to your ear and listen to the cretans instruct you).

    --
    www.voiceofthehive.com - Beekeeping and Honeybees for those who don't.
  81. eBay just jumped the shark by wiredlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know the CoS is manned by a bunch of persistent barratrous bastards but it is absolutely ridiculous that eBay would cave into them this way. It's lazy and irresponsible for a company the size of eBay to let CoS have their way once again when they have the resources to fight their crap.

    It's one thing for the scientologists to claim copyright protections on their literature but restricting the sale or e-meters is something they don't have the right to do. E-meters are hard physical items that are subject to the right of first sale doctrine. There is no copyright violation going on with their resale. Likewise, there should be nothing wrong with people reselling original copies of CoS literature provided they aren't bound by a contract that says otherwise.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  82. Better yet, I just changed all my ongoing auctions by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    To use the word "e-meter". Man, that'll drive up hits! Hopefully Scientologists won't whack them though.

  83. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You shouldn't talk of things about which you are ignorant.

    There almost certainly was a historical Buddha. There is far more evidence for this, from independent sources, than for (e.g.) Socrates.

    And FYI, the Buddha never said he was anything but a normal man. In fact, he stated again and again that he was just that -- not some kind of a God or superbeing.

  84. Another example of the abusive VERO program by gleffler · · Score: 4, Informative

    eBay has long since decided to deputize any company that feels like signing papers with complete and unfettered access to eBay. Anyone that signs a "legally binding document" can then gain power to delete any auction from eBay for whatever reason they feel like. If it's because of counterfeit or provably stolen product, that's fine, but eBay's history of repudiating first sale has really gotten tiring.

    Try reselling Weight Watchers program materials. They get deleted on a regular basis because Weight Watchers doesn't like it if you resell them. There's no legal basis for this, and if you push the issue with eBay, the response you get is "Well, they said they don't want you selling them, so too bad." They tell you to "take it up with Weight Watchers" who says "We say you can't sell them, and that's that."

    VeRO is a bullshit program that lets eBay wash their hands of legitimate issues on the site and that gives companies ridiculously too much power. Do you think that if I set up a stand at a flea market reselling legally acquired materials, that the flea market owners would stand for the publisher of those materials walking around with a rubber hose and yanking the items away if I tried to sell them?

    This isn't news, hopefully this just pushes VeRO into the public eye and convinces eBay to get rid of it, or to force "rights owners" (I wasn't aware that a "right to prevent resale" existed) to actually file individual complaints based on some sort of legal theory to delist an item, not just "We don't want these resold." Scn is abusing it like they abuse everything else, but this system seems to be made specifically to facilitate abuse.

    1. Re:Another example of the abusive VERO program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Microsoft does the same thing. I listed an Ebay auction to sell my Office 2000 Professional Full Edition, not an upgrade or an OEM, software that I paid for, and the ten thousand pound gorilla cancelled my auction. Fuck Microsoft and Fuck the church of scientology.

      Funny though. I have sold more than one Scientology official book on Ebay, and never had a problem. A friend of mine stumbled on a box of insider scientology manuals at an estate sale, and resold them on a website other than Ebay for a small fortune, within a day of listing them for sale.

  85. And eBay begins its' slide into the pit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, wow. I have never used eBay to buy or sell anything and it appears now that I never shall.

    1. Re:And eBay begins its' slide into the pit ... by Wuhao · · Score: 1

      I have never used eBay to buy or sell anything We could tell that as soon as you said "begins its slide into the pit," as if eBay's management has been particularly stellar until this point. The same eBay that owns Paypal -- the same eBay that after all these years just addressed the retaliatory feedback problem that everyone complained about with a solution that nobody wanted. The same eBay that is notorious for its rampant scams, frauds and pseudo-legal "fine print" schemes. The same eBay that enabled this entire debacle by offering companies, and not just Scientology, virtually unfettered administrative access to their auction listings, and then actively refused to police its use -- the same eBay that so bends over backwards to service the needs of companies who have nothing to do with the operation of the site but make nebulous claims of abuses of their rights by sellers, and the very same eBay that then whips around and tells its own customers concerned with the potential for abuse by VeRO that they are protected by "legally-binding agreements." That very same eBay has fed us that very same line before, when it says our protection against fraudulent sellers and buyers is -- you guessed it -- legally-binding agreements. And from what I can see, the legally-binding agreements for VeRO carry the very same weight as the legally-binding agreements for auctions.

      eBay isn't sliding into the pit -- it IS the #1 festering, stinking cesspit on the Internet. I hope that Scientology and other VeRO users abuse the everliving shit out of the system, convincing people to finally throw up their hands and go somewhere else, and VeRO promises not to disappoint.
  86. No there's plenty of harm done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is the basic VeRO page from ebay
    http://pages.ebay.com/help/tp/programs-vero-ov.html

    here's the important excerpt

    How your personal information may be released. eBay will never give out your credit card information, except in rare cases when required by a court, or law enforcement agency. However, eBay's Privacy Policy states, "we can (and you authorize us to) disclose your User ID, name, street address, city, state, zip code, country, phone number, email, and company name to eBay VeRO Program participants as we in our sole discretion believe necessary or appropriate in connection with an investigation of fraud, intellectual property infringement, piracy, or other unlawful activity." So basically they'll give any VeRO member pretty much everything but your credit card information. Excuse me, but im getting out my tinfoil hat and going to hide in my basement
  87. It's functional? by Tony · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...you could not come close to it's functionality with that original patent's design... Uhm... what functionality is that, exactly? It seems it has one function: to separate fools from their money in the service of richer fools. In that way, it seems to work identically to the 1960's version, only with a cooler name.

    And: it sounds like it was named by an eight-year-old.
    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  88. Church by castrox · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What *I* really don't get is why people don't just call Scientology for what it is: a sect. That way people who never heard of them will be better prepared when meeting a recruiting member and on guard.

    Insisting that they are a Church really isn't fair to the other religions humanity knows. Nevermind they use a name with "church" in it (not in Israel..!). AFAIK Scientology is a company run by greedy, manipulative lunatics for sheer profit.

    The weak minded and gullible are indoctrinated and *scammed* (which is an important point) by their people.

    Come to think of it.. it is actually hard to draw a line what a church is. In the old times the christian Church scammed its members aswell (and banished its non-members). Scientologists are, as it seems, prohibitively aggressive.

    --
    Fight for your digital freedom, join the EFF *now*: http://www.eff.org/support/
  89. Listed on CraigsList now by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 1

    Screw Ebay. They just went to craigslist.

    --

    Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
  90. Fun facts about the e-meter by mitchplanck · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/E-Meter/ Including how to make your own!

  91. /s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by davidwr · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can someone with more humor than yours truly rewrite this starring CowboyNeal? WWCND?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem with "WWCBND?" is that it's just not a terribly useful guiding philosophy. For instance, imagine you're in a situation where you're having trouble getting along with your coworkers, and so you ask yourself, "WWCBND?" The answer is that CowboyNeal would sit on a couch, eat Pringles, and play video games. So, as you can see, "WWCBND?" has two major problems:

      First, the solution is *always* to sit on a couch, eat Pringles, and play video games because that's all we know about CowboyNeal. "WWCBND?" dictates that you sit on a couch, eat Pringles, and play video games in any situation, whether it's marital problems, dealing with the poor, or feeling frustrated that you dropped your grilled cheese sandwich: just sit on a couch, eat some Pringles, and play video games. It's just not very flexible as a philosophy.

      The second issue with the "WWCBND?" philosophy is more practical. CowboyNeal is a fat slob. As a fat slob, he already has the resources to follow through with this plan, in particular, he has a couch, lots of Pringles, and plenty of video games to play. Unless you have access to similar resources, "WWCBND?" is just not practical to apply to your everyday life. Although I admit, when I think of how to deal with the fact that I too am a fat slob, and then ask "WWCBND?", I have to admit that the philosophy does have some appeal.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by somersault · · Score: 1

      That was actually hilarious. I love repetitive humour. I absolutely love it. I really do love repetetive humour. Anyway Cowboy Neal would think up a few different options, post them as a poll on slashdot, then do whatever we told him to, obviously..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know... sitting on a couch, eating Pringles, and playing video games has never caused wars or anything. The world would be a better place if people followed CowboyNeal's fine example.

    4. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 3, Funny

      The answer is that CowboyNeal would sit on a couch The What Would Tom Cruise Do (WWTCD) ideology would dictate you *jump* on the couch. In any situation.

      ~Jarik
    5. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by AoT · · Score: 2

      Except for the great couch war of aught five. That sure was a doozy.

    6. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by DemingBuiltMyHotRod · · Score: 1

      You know... sitting on a couch, eating Pringles, and playing video games has never caused wars or anything. The world would be a better place if people followed CowboyNeal's fine example.

      In that case, "...lets play Global Thermonuclear War!"

    7. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. We'd all pick the CowboyNeal option, and then what/who would he do?

    8. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by Karem+Lore · · Score: 1

      You OBVIOUSLY are not playing the right games...you tried Battlefield or World of Warcraft, maybe even Planetside (at a push)? Definitely wars going on there!

      --
      When all is said and done, nothing changes...
    9. Re:/s/Xenu/Cowboyneal by WK2 · · Score: 1

      Gathering a bunch of people and putting them on spaceships shaped like 1950's era jets, shipping them off to the far reaches of the galaxy, and blowing them up with nukes never started any wars either.

      The problem is:

      a) it still isn't an adequate solution for every problem
      b) just because it hasn't started any wars in the past, doesn't necessarily mean that it won't start any wars in the future.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
  92. How to complain to ebay? by ionymous · · Score: 1
    If someone can post an email address and complaint letter citing an auction that was illegitimately removed, I will send a complaint to ebay.

    And I'm sure others will too.

    Perhaps if ebay knows we are watching, they'll behave better.

  93. Blueprints to an emeter by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

    About 10 years ago I came across some plans for one of these emeter things. It was really simple to build. I had all the parts I needed in my scrap electronics bins. Every thing except the soup cans. I had to use beer cans.

    First order was to empty the beer cans. I decided to empty a few more just in case. It got a little fuzzy after that. I think it worked. I found it the next morning, the needle was stuck between inebriated and tanked.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  94. Then Energizer Bunny Is Your Ghod by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Cut the cord and worship your full-of-power ghod!

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Then Energizer Bunny Is Your Ghod by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      Ghod schmod!

      Kneel before Zod!

  95. eBay is not a private vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eBay, as a private vendor, can fully decide what and what not can be sold on their site

    Don't be a dickhead. eBay is a public auctioneer, and it hosts public auctions under applicable US law. While it might be nice if auctioneers indeed had the power to fully decide by themselves what and what not can be auctioned on their sites, that's not how things work in the US, not any other country.

  96. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always suspected Scientologists were a bunch of quack pots. After this I went here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenu and now...I KNOW they are all COO COO for Cocoa Puffs!

  97. Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  98. Nothing to see here, just the DMCA by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
    If you read eBay's policy about this program, all the victims of this Scientology scam have to do is file a Counter Notice with eBay, and their item will be back up in 10 days unless the CoS actually files suit in court to prevent it (which they could do anyway).

    Yes, it's an inconvenience... one of many brought to you by the DMCA. It's no different from any other takedown notice procedure, except perhaps in that it automates (? not specified) a process that would have happened anyway, almost as quickly, at great expense to eBay.

  99. Take to the (online) streets and protest!! by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 1

    For those saying that we should boycott eBay: Don't bother... It will have almost zero effect, and only indirectly attacks the Church of Scientology.

    A better plan is to fight fire with fire: Create new eBay ids and just flood the place with sales of E-meters and anti-Scientology stuff. Anything you can think of. The assholes monitoring the eBay database will see that, and you're more likely to get the attention of CoS, eBay, the news media, and (hopefully) legislators.

    But don't stop there... post E-meters for sale in every city on Craigslist. Use the local scientology office's phone number for the posting.

    Be creative! But always go directly after CoS!

    1. Re:Take to the (online) streets and protest!! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Excellent idea. I think I will also just tag my legitimate auctions with keywords that should trigger CoS snoops. Time to poke around on wikipedia for some good authentic sounding keywords to put in my title and descriptions.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  100. Re:Don't tell Chef but.. I'm Buddhist... by davidsyes · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mahayana, to be specific....

    OM-MA-NI-PAD-ME-HUM

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantra

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  101. Boycotts won't work by Dara+Hazeghi · · Score: 0

    A more effective strategy is to start up a whole bunch of fake E-meter sales on eBay.

    --
    Left 404: Why the RIGHT is WRONG
  102. L Ron totally got the message wrong... by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    When he had his intergalactic vision of the extreme extreme past, he misinterpreted the equation for wavelength of c/nu as an unstoppable evil alien force. Nothing like having your mind blank out when all you have is the frequency of an EM wave and you need to convert to wavelength... whoever made the time machine and is fucking with L.Ron's past head, can you please call him again and clear this shit up.

    And I totally need to make "i-Meters" and sell them on eBay to curious Scientologists under the company name Pseudology Inc. I promise plenty of blinkenlights and sounds. The machine needs to make a tone that would imply doubtfulness when someone is possibly lying, almost like a "hrmmmmmm" sound. Maybe a little LCD with a smiley face that changes expressions as well just to be over-the-top, or like an electronic slot machine that rolls the wheels each time you take a reading. "Cherry... Cherry... awww Lemon - You're lying!!!"

    I should really get more sleep. :-)

  103. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    as far as i am concerned you all have way too much power and are responsible for every war there has ever been

    Cold War. Stalin says hi.

    --
    "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  104. /.'ers - README by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Fellow /.'ers - Those of you who are getting pissed off with this cult and its numerous abuses of human rights, free speech and the legal system; join us on the streets of the major cities around the world this March 15th for a second global protest against the Scientology organization.

    The February 10th global protests were a huge success that has spawned hundreds of videos and news articles, and the next round has the potential to be an order of magnitude better. Take a stand with us and help us do something, anything, about this criminal organization... an organization that has bullied and lied its way to tax exemption status (that many of us here directly fund with our tax dollars), despite obviously being a ruthless business empire. An organization that has attempted to silence any and all critics with litigation, harassment and physical violence. An organization that is visibly gaining a foot hold in major media outlets and internet sites to wield toward its own nefarious ends.

    /.'ers are both an intelligent and cynical bunch, and you have no need to take my word for any of these claims. Do your own research, Google "Operation Freakout", "Operation Snow White", "Lisa McPherson", "Noah Lottick", "Scientology Fair Game Policy", "L Ron Hubbard", "R2-45", "Tom Cruise Missile" and most importantly, check out Enturbulation.org to see what this movement is all about and how you can help.

    We have made a huge difference already, and will continue to do so. But the Church of Scientology is no cake walk in the tea park, we need all the help we can get. As much as we all love sitting around slamming Ballmer, bitching about monolithic kernel architecture and regurgitating ObSimpsons quotes - this is an golden opportunity to actually do something about a real and present evil in our society.

    Rise up and take action. You will not stand alone.

  105. Since the members... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...seem to be enjoying receiving it so much.

  106. I talked to my eBay Rep about this... by Mikenotmike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to ebay, like others mentioned in this article, they were given the same access as any other manufacturer, a fast track to Vero so they can get items removed quickly, but it still has to go through Vero. But this isn't to stop the sale of used e-meters most likely, it's to stop the sale of FAKE e-meters, since Scientology has patents on all their bogus devices (http://home.snafu.de/tilman/prolinks/patents.html). Ebay will allows remove listings for unauthorized replica's, it's their policy.

  107. No, *do* laugh at them by edremy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Yes, there is nothing at all funny about the things that Scientology does. But their beliefs *should* be held up for public ridicule, all the more so since they are so damn protective of them. Ridicule is an amazingly powerful tool when engaged in a battle of ideas, and this is at the core a battle of ideas. They want people to think they are some sort of wonderful self help operation that will give you insight into your mind and help you through difficult times. Having a pile of people pointing out what they really believe and laughing at them infuriates them, helps keep the suckers away and defuses their power as a "church".

    Think about the South Park episode that went through the entire theology of the CoS, with a big blinking sign that read "This is what Scientologists actually believe" over the animation. That was even more effective than the "Dum Dum Dum Dum Dum" song refrain about the Mormons, all the more so since there was no attempt at all at the end of the episode to paint actual CoS members as decent human beings, unlike the Mormon episode.

    Laugh at them.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  108. Oh, okay. It's just blustering, after all. by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, I just don't give a fuck. What's the law going to do? I just opened 5,000 various auctions in my Firefox browser and set them to auto-refresh at the same time. The fact that their servers couldn't stand up to a simulation of 5,000 people clicking 'refresh' at the same time doesn't constitute a violation of law. The key word in the sentence is 'TRIED' not 'successfully carried out' My bad. You *attempted* to commit a felony. Didn't mean to ruffle your feathers there, chief.

    In that case, never mind. It's much more likely that you executed a denial of service attack on your *own* machine than on eBay. I mean, you do know that Firefox has an upper limit on how many connections it will actually open at the same time, right? (Go to about:config and filter for "connect.") All other connections are just placed in a queue until Firefox has an available slot. The slowdown was entirely on your own machine and LAN.

    I mean, honestly... Did you really think that you were being some sort of 1337 super-hax0r by using *one* machine on a single home or school connection to bog down one of the largest e-commerce sites on the planet?

    (Oh, also, your proposed Million Loser March is more likely to DoS your proxy service than eBay itself.)

    The law's tried it before anyways. I run rings around them every time, simpyly because most judges aren't smart enough to know what they're trying to charge me for. Sure thing, kid. Keep saying things like that in a public forum. We're all in awe of your brilliance and eagerly await to see the way in which your intellect would dazzle the courtroom.
    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  109. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by enjerth · · Score: 1

    Religon is nothing more than a means for the MINORITY to CONTROL the MAJORITY and the sooner you all get to realise that the better the world will be It's a great deal more. But it certainly is abused in that way, just like..... politics.

    Although I think that money trumps all. We should get rid of money, because it's nothing more than a means for the minority to control the majority.
  110. Well if you ask me by waffledoodle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    [This comment removed due to a copyright claim by Church of Scientology International]

  111. Forgetting one cruicial part... by billius · · Score: 1

    This is to stop members from buying used units from ex-members instead of buying from the official (and very expensive) source. Also to keep people from testing them independently and verifying for themselves that they are, in fact, completely useless and total bullshit.
  112. Not long now by mustafap · · Score: 1

    How long before this so called church can log into Slashdot and delete stories about themselves?

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    1. Re:Not long now by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean like when they [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]?

  113. Since forever by castrox · · Score: 1

    I live in Sweden. We're sort of secularized and seeing religious evangelists on TV (except perhaps fiction) is very uncommon. I must confess I haven't been to church in 18 years.. and by then I was a kid.

    My last trip to New York offered me new insight on this though. While changing channels I saw a fair deal of (weird) christian stuff.

    --
    Fight for your digital freedom, join the EFF *now*: http://www.eff.org/support/
  114. It gets funnier, much funnier... by milsoRgen · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want a good laugh, these 2 sites offer a run down on their beliefs:

    http://www.xenu.net/
    http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/fishman/index2.html

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  115. Another movie quote for your collection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xenu the galactic prince brought to earth 75 million years ago, set near some volcanoes near Hawaii.

    XENU DOESN'T SURF!

  116. Open letter to eBay by chord.wav · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear eBay,
    Get some balls.

    Sincerely,
    Me

    1. Re:Open letter to eBay by Jaxoreth · · Score: 1

      Dear eBay,
      Get some balls. Maybe they could buy some used.
      --
      In general, it is safe and legal to kill your children. -- POSIX Programmer's Guide
  117. In related Scientology news... by NotFamous · · Score: 1

    I hear they almost blocked the release of KDE 4.0 - apparently the felt it was really Theta quality software.

    --
    Some settling may occur during posting.
  118. Did they change their name? by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Did they change their name?

    I would suggest "Not So Immaculate Mary"... shades of Apple renaming "Sagan" to "BHA"?

    -- Terry

    1. Re:Did they change their name? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Looking back on the history of that Sagan controversey and Apple history in general, it isn't hard now to say Sagan had a right to be offended. Who wants to have a megabucks-wasted dead end programming disaster named after them?

    2. Re:Did they change their name? by drxenos · · Score: 1

      No, the church didn't have a leg to stand on.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
  119. Re:Don't tell Chef but.. I'm Buddhist... by edittard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Padme yum? I can't disagree.

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  120. E-Bay has been doing this since 1998! by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the same thing that eBay has been doing since they killed my auctions in 1998.

    You see, Microsoft wanted to engage in illegal price fixing, and killed my auctions reselling copies of Microsoft software that I had won as door prizes.

    I had never agreed to a license agreement, so I was not bound by it, but eBay still allowed Microsoft to kill my auctions.

    It was only after I won my small-claims lawsuit against eBay for breech of contract, and another small claims court suit against Microsoft for slander that I got another eBay account. That's why my account says "since 1999."

    Anyway, great job hopping on this story 9 years later, /.

    Andy

    1. Re:E-Bay has been doing this since 1998! by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Parent knows what he is talking about. Seriously, who gives a shit about CoS, e-meters and dolts who buy e-meters? I stopped used Ebay years ago because of VERO, after selling a couple of video game accounts. The program is basically a giant middle finger to Ebay's clients: it is unfair and rude for two reasons, regardless of who is censoring: (1) it does not (and cannot) provide any kind of advance warning and (2) it does not (and cannot) provide a coherent explanation of one's violation.

      I cannot be bothered to read TFA, but if CoS just joined it, then I am honestly amazed at how late they are.

  121. And so it becomes apparent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And people say geeks have no knowledge of sects.

  122. Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > What makes it even more interesting is that it -has no leaders-.

    Identify one, and he will be replaced by 10. No single point of failure. Anon can easily survive nuclear weapons or censorship or lawyers.

    > Somehow, out of total anarchy, it's managed to coalesce a sort of identity to itself, and has directed attention towards a single goal.

    Anon is not anarchic. It is chaotic as in 'a large chaotic system.' You can see the butterfly-effect quite clearly at times. This is one of those times. It remains to be seen how focused Anonymous can remain over the long term, however. March 15th will be and interesting day.

  123. Tom Cruise doesn't read slashdot? by dtolman · · Score: 1

    C'mon - who else is IN scientology except for celeb's and bored rich people pining away for fun exclusivity of the old mystery religions of 2000 years ago.

  124. Vibrators & E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

    I don't think it came with an adaptor to plug into the wall. Well when you're a Harry Potter fanatic like me, you're playing with your vibrating broom down in your parents basement 24/7, spending a substantial amount of your income on batteries. So I rigged up my own AC adapter with parts I fished out of the dumpster behind the RadioShack.
    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  125. And Flamebait ... by kramulous · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    pi = 22/7

    --
    .
  126. Forcing E-Meters by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

    What is this 'force' you speak of?

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  127. Re:eBay just jumped another shark by maxume · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Skype, and the blase attitude about fraud that has been there since pretty much the beginning.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  128. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by eclectic4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Correct.

    And things like rising from an untimely death after being nailed to a cross (or tree) three days after dying (and then celebrating), having a last supper, being born of a virgin, being the son of a god, etc... were all prevalent beliefs of pagan mythology at the time of and well before Jesus. A guy who had these "myths" thrown upon his name decades after he was dead in order to start a religion.

    People forget that the history of most religions are far more "earth-bound" than they like to realize...

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  129. E-Meter? Ha! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    An E-Meter is no match for the "Church of Jobs" iMeter!

  130. eBay is dying by mveloso · · Score: 1

    It's time for an eBay competitor.

  131. Why Isn't There...? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Why isn't there a place to sell everything eBay refuses to sell? Someone ought to be able to make a fair living with such a site.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Why Isn't There...? by Babu+'God'+Hoover · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ebay is a legal party to transactions via it's site. A site allowing anything goes sales can only charge a 'publishing fee'. Craig's list doesn't charge anything so there's no way to compete.

      Yes, you could set up a pay to advertise or pay to view site for craig's list prohibited stuff like Nazi, gun, COS, shrunken head, stars and bars,... but most of this already gets traded in aficionado forums. Perhaps one of the COS related forums has a 'swapmeet' page. If not, it's likely the best place to make sale on an e-meter.

      IMO L-Ron wasn't even original. His quackery is much in the style of Edgar Cayce. Maybe COS needs all those lawyers to fend off these guys?

  132. Craigslist??? by newgalactic · · Score: 1

    Can we just move over to Craigslist. Sure, it's not ideal, but It'll do in a pinch.

    1. Re:Craigslist??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to sell an e-meter on craigslist and see if the Church kidnaps you when the buyer and seller meet? (I am assuming people selling e-meters are ex-Scientology members).

  133. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  134. Someone want to... by VoltageX · · Score: 1

    Someone should volunteer to try to get an auction deleted by the CoS and see if you get the pedo-pamphlets in your street.

    --
    "Anonymous could not immediately be reached for further comment." - International Business Times
  135. Some Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, okay, think of those churches you've been to, and the ones you've seen on TV.

    Now, imagine what an organization would be like if it were an order of magnitude or two worse than that.

  136. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Informative? The mods are on crack again. "Random, unsupported statements made by a stranger on the internet" != "informative"

  137. Patent Expired - the public owns it now by paulkingnz · · Score: 1

    Patent Expired - the public owns it now. Game Over Xenu

  138. COS and ebay ignore the "first-sale doctrine" by Babu+'God'+Hoover · · Score: 1

    It's a case for the FTC and courts. Ebay and COS have no legal right to prohibit resale of COS paraphernalia.

    If unfamiliar: Firt-sale doctrine

  139. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what Anon will have to say about this...

  140. I call BS by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

    Where in the world do you live? Vatican City? I have not heard of any such thing, and I know of numerous bands across the world with far more inflammatory names than the hardly eyebrow raising one you have stated.

    Try some choice ones such as: Impaled Nazarene, Bastard Christ, Christian Epidemic, Dead Christ Cult, and so on. Many more to be found on this list. And these are just names, nevermind song titles and lyrics.

    --
    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    1. Re:I call BS by drxenos · · Score: 1

      You can call "BS" all you like. It happens about 15 yrs. ago when I was in junior college. They were a popular band that use to play at the college a lot. You're having never heard of it doesn't affect its truthfulness. You can sue for anything in this world. It doesn't mean they won.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
  141. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  142. Not to be paranoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...But are they really sure there is no foul play ? We are speaking of the CoS after all, with operation snow white and many other bad stuff.

  143. Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like eating paste

  144. Why is eBay even doing this by jonwil · · Score: 1

    What law is being broken by the sale of e-meters?

    Its like if Disney asked eBay to stop people selling second hand Disney DVDs so they can continue to rape consumers with the price they charge for new DVDs of the same content.

    And even if the law is being broken somehow, why should ebay give this so-called "church" any greater access than what they give to other people. Do they give Disney direct access to cancel auctions of pirate Disney DVDs? Do they give Gucci direct access to cancel auctions of fake Gucci stuff? Do they give Microsoft direct access to cancel auctions of OEM software? As far as I know, no they dont. So why should this "church" get such powers? (obviously if other members of the VeRO program do get such powers, then thats different)

  145. Re:Oh, okay. It's just blustering, after all. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    In that case, never mind. It's much more likely that you executed a denial of service attack on your *own* machine than on eBay. I mean, you do know that Firefox has an upper limit on how many connections it will actually open at the same time, right? (Go to about:config and filter for "connect.") All other connections are just placed in a queue until Firefox has an available slot. The slowdown was entirely on your own machine and LAN.

    It is possible that eBay does some kind of distributed balancing based on IP or MAC, in which case he could, *may*be, have slowed one particular eBay server that happened to be assigned to his IP or MAC. But your scenario is much more likely... did he verify it was "DOSed" with a neutral third party on a different ISP?

  146. Secrets of the e-meter by underworld · · Score: 1

    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/E-Meter/

    Now everyone go make your own knock-off. Call it a p-meter, or a g-meter, or a niceta-meter and sell them as alternatives to e-meters ... or better yet, sell them as parodies of e-meters!!

    wait. let me re-state this in slashdot-ese

    1. obtain e-meter schematics from web
    2. build clone or parody e-meter
    3. sell them on ebay
    4. profit!!!

  147. It's just to keep their own members in line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E-meters are "expensive" for a reason. The price is set so that Joe CoS members can't afford to pay for them (or the auditing classes that go with them). Joe CoS member instead sells themselves to the church as indentured servant to obtain them (e.g., volunteering in their recruitment centers for many hours). However, if you were sufficiently brainwashed as to want an e-meter (or the auditing classes) that you would sell yourself to the church to get one, you might be tempted to buy one on e-bay if you saw one (instead of living in destitution). If you couldn't find a way to get one any other way than buy it through the CoS, well you'd have to sell yourself to the CoS, right?

    So it begs the question, why would the CoS want Joe CoS member escape from selling out to the church if they could arrange escape to be difficult and they had a willing accomplice?

    Kind of like how universities don't like textbook resales by used book stores. It cuts from the bookstore revenue and reduces the dependence the student has on the financial aid department. Universities can't legally stop it, but they do as much as they can to discourage it (often bullying school newspapers from running ads or updating versions as quickly as they can to make old version obsolete). Unfortunatly the CoS can't change the e-meter w/o upseting the mythology, or you know they would have done it by now, but somehow universities can get away with changing 1000 year old physics and math without upsetting the mythology of their degrees... Hmmm...

  148. Straw that broke the camel's back by Rassleholic · · Score: 1

    I was an eBay buyer and seller since 1999. 100% positive feedback rating with over 140 successful transactions despite 2 or 3 minor bumps. I've stuck with them despite the fee increases, despite the PayPal crap, despite everything. The recent fee hikes and the removal of the ability of sellers to post negative feedback had me seriously questioning my continued presence on the site. This blatant violation of the first sale doctrine and handing over of such vast amounts of power to a ruthless cult have proven to be the last straw. A few minutes after reading this article I initiated the process to cancel my eBay account and deleted my eBay bookmark. I wanted to leave them specific reasons why I was leaving but they didn't even give me the option. All they had was a few stupid drop down menus that gave me some bs about the rules being there to make it "fair" for both buyers and sellers after I clicked ok.

    --
    Not noteable, IMO a rubbish article.
  149. do you want to pay for a nonlazy way? by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    You do realize the only way E-Bay could hire the platoons of lawyers and programmers it would take to enforce rights compliance in a nonlazy would be to take it out of user fees, right?

    I mean, E-Bay like all of us doesn't know where the magic money tree is, that you merely shake to get plenty of cash to Do What's Right.

    I'm guessing E-Bay made a simple calculation:

    (1) Do our users want to pay the fees needed for a top-notch rights compliance program?

    (2) Uh, no!

    (3) OK, let's roll out the cheapest alternative we can.

    When (2) changes, so will (3), and not before.

  150. This really is a no-brainer: by merc · · Score: 1

    Their company, their rules. If you find this objectionable (and, certainly I do) then stop doing business on or with eBay.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  151. Dupe! by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

    Well, not quite a dupe, but they've been at this for years.

  152. Bottom line for tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For any US of A American or any other free-minded person, the limit for tolerance should be whether an organization (religion, country, whatever) permits or forbids criticism of itself. Criticism is a prerequisite for reason, and democracy. To any citizen of a free world, nations which forbid criticism (e.g. China, Thailand (of its king), etc) are wholly illegitimate and their governments should be overturned. Same for religions (e.g. Islam, or Scientology). If you don't accept criticism ... we don't accept you. Period. Goodbye.

    Criticize the US all you want (yes, please do, we encourage it), but the very fact that we in the US can criticize the US all that WE want is proof enough that at least we have crossed the threshhold of baby steps on the road to reason and freedom, which criticism-fearing religions and countries haven't even matured enough yet to begin.

  153. Interesting, but ... by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    what makes you think a church can't sue? While certainly a religion can't sue, because a religion has no corporeal body, a church which practices a religion does have a corporeal existence and can sue. Why EBay has given CoS the ability to cancel any auction, is beyond me, but EBay's always been strange, and keeps getting stranger, but maybe EBay got ...
    <voice class:Brando>
          an offer they couldn't refuse
    </voice>.

  154. Learn from DDoS Attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A DDoS attack floods a server with useless packets costing the server processing time until it's resources are used up or the attack stops.

    Apply this to the eBay auctions:

    Mass postings of Scientology related things will tax Scientologys resources (time, manpower, or money) until they are used up or the attack stops.

    I'm guessing they have an intern in a cube surfing eBay among other tasks and s/he may pull down a few auctions a day, or maybe a dozen. I wonder what would happen if hundreds or thousands of auctions were submitted. Daily. By Anonymous.

    Has anyone reverse engeneered these things? Can a clone or software version be built?

  155. Re:Pedophilic Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, OK, but this is one of the few Scientology claims that makes a weird backwards sense. One of the arguments for the chastity vows and restriction of male gender for the Catholic priesthood is that it's to try to get closer to god by emulating the actions of his son. Now, what else have Catholic priests been famous for in the last hundred years?

    Now, I don't agree with that argument because it's got a fundamental logical fallacy (extra bonus points left as an exercise to the reader). But, who knows? Maybe L. Ron or someone he knew well was subject to the close attentions of their parish priest and that gave him the idea.

  156. why would e-bay do such a thing. by The_Rook · · Score: 1

    sounds like someone high up in e-bay's hierarchy is a scientologist.

    --
    when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  157. The really interesting part... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    "Imagine if the makers of the other products out there followed suit. You would not be able to purchase second hand goods. Only directly from the original outlet. Kinda stifles the economy since the majority of vehicles out there are purchased as used items. Just one example but it would have a very bad impact if this method of controlling profit spreads."

    Which is what makes the creation of such a program so foolish on eBay's part. At some point, enough companies could do just that... up to the point that it prevents eBay itself from being able to function at all. eBay's entire business model is making commission on sales of after market items. If all these after market items sold through eBay everyday simply vanished, eBay would be screwed.

    And, even if they corrected the problem by removing the VeRO program from their service, eBay would just end up back where they started, ielding every auction complaint on a case by case basis. By then though, buyer and seller confidence in eBay's services will have dropped so far that eBay might not even be able to convince sellers to use their site even by making all listings free globally.

    eBay, say hello to the breaking point of your dot com bubble.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  158. Obvious Solution by waterford0069 · · Score: 1

    If you have enough people who mention the e-meter and Scientology in their eBay post (even if it some complicated way of saying "this is not an Scientologist e-meter" so it is difficult to parse out the bad from the good), then their monitors will be flooded with alerts. If they don't check each one by hand, then eBay will be flooded - in which case, they'll probably toss the Scientologists out of the program for not doing their due diligence.

    Muahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!

  159. This just in! by dexomn · · Score: 1

    Church of Scientology: "NO, once again, we do not allow the resale of our e-meters OR our dehydrated water on ebay!"

  160. Innaccurate info from original, anonymous poster by Schlage · · Score: 2, Informative

    The summary states that "The Church of Scientology can delete auctions from eBay with no supervision under the VeRO program," but even according to the linked article this is not the case. The removals are taking place through the VeRO program, they're just contending that the removals are frivolous. As if that weren't enough, the title states that Scientology has been given direct access to the database. Going from frivolous removals to unfettered access to eBay's DB is a pretty ridiculous leap, and seems disengenous on the part of the original poster.

    Having once worked at eBay (I quit in late '07) in association with people on the VeRO team, I can tell you that direct access to the DB is not required to get an item off the site very quickly; it is quite easy for rights-holders to get items they claim to be infringing removed... all it takes is a single qualifying complaint (per item while I was there, but they may allow lists now).

    A couple of notes about VeRO compaints, however:

    1- The complaint is made under penalty of perjury, which creates some potential for liability for frivolous or incorrect complaints on the part of the complainant (potentially difficult to take legal action on, but present).
    2- It is a complaint of IP (Intellectual Property) infringement, not simply copyright infringement. That's why items that are sold from an organization for a specific use, and whose resale is legally limited, can be said to infringe if they are being used/sold in a way inconsistent with the IP owner's wishes.
    3- There is an appeals process, and the item can potentially get put back on the site.

    For an overview of the process, you can go to this page eBay provides to explain it: http://pages.ebay.com/help/tp/vero-rights-owner.html

    If you'd like to see a copy of the notice that VeRO members (registered IP owners) must send to get things removed, then download this PDF (also linked from the priorly mentioned page): http://pages.ebay.com/help/community/NOCI1.pdf

  161. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by socz · · Score: 0

    You shouldn't talk of things about which you are ignorant. There almost certainly was a historical Buddha. There is far more evidence for this, from independent sources, than for (e.g.) Socrates. And FYI, the Buddha never said he was anything but a normal man. In fact, he stated again and again that he was just that -- not some kind of a God or superbeing.


    huh? can you please try to explain how there is more evidence for buddha than there is for socrates???

    From wikipedia about buddha

    Siddhrtha Gautama (Sanskrit; Pali: Siddhattha Gotama) was a spiritual teacher from ancient India and the founder of Buddhism.[1] He is generally recognized by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha (Sammsambuddha) of our age. The time of his birth and death are uncertain: most early 20th-century historians date his lifetime from circa 563 BCE to 483 BCE; more recently, however, at a specialist symposium on this question,[2] the majority of those scholars who presented definite opinions gave dates within 20 years either side of 400 BCE for the Buddha's death, with others supporting earlier or later dates. from wikipedia about socrates

    Socrates (Greek: c. 470 BCE-399 BCE), of the deme Alopece of Athens, was a Classical Greek philosopher. He is best known for the creation of Socratic irony and the Socratic Method, or elenchus. Specifically, Socrates is renowned for developing the practice of a philosophical type of pedagogy, in which the teacher asks questions of the students to elicit the best answer, and fundamental insight, on the part of the student.

    And if you talk about independent sources Socrates is well known. Although he fortunately never wrote anything (which added to his mystic), he is well remembered through MANY people. The reason we have "academy" is because of one of his students who opened the school on the hill! This is all thanks to Socrates who was the inspiration of the place of learning for teaching virtues to people so they could govern better!
    --
    My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  162. Scientology Paraphanelia by dexomn · · Score: 2

    It would be better for everyone if they didn't allow ANY of this garbage to be sold on ebay.

  163. What the fuck? by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

    Why do companies act in such a shockingly retarded fashion?

    I'm baffled...

  164. Re:Don't tell Tom but by Justabit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There must be alot of dissalusioned ex members in Sydney cause we get them in our second hand store all the time. Lots of fun to play with the trick being to adjust your squeeze while looking at the meter. From what i can tell its just a fancy galvanic skin response meter that is heighly tunable. If you want to use it semi seriously you could see your reaction to questions you ask yourself, self diagnosis with a bit of force feedback. If you want to have fun with the poor meter drivers on open days that they have, think of horrible things when they ask you about your relationship with your kids, and nice things.. etc. Either way its an excellent device for practicing lying and therefor acting, no wonder TC and JT are into it. We have 1 or 2 regular buyers who get them all, no questions asked. Could be higher ups who dont want to make a fuss.

    --
    "Persistance is Fertile" - Me. I can quote myself if I want to.
  165. FOLLOWUP TO "Well, I just altered my auctions..." by JoshDM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heh. My auction page views actually have skyrocketed from 5 to 100 in just a few hours. Search for "E-meter"; I'm the one selling comic books.

  166. VeRO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is so full of stupidity. Take off the tinfoil hat please.

    *I do not speak for eBay, this is not legal advice*

    Anyone with a VeRO account can request any auction to be removed. As long as there is a registered trademark, patent, design right, etc. This is primarily to prevent abuse of intellectual property (eg, counterfeits, replicas, pirate copies, brand names on products they do not make or endorse.)

    CoS would not be able to get this stuff removed if the sellers put more than 3 minutes into writing the auction.

    The vast majority of stuff removed by eBay under the VeRO program is because the seller is blissfully ignorant and plays dumb.
    - Do not sell items that you can not prove you bought or acquired legally directly from the rights owner - like every designer brand name. You only get one chance. Better to post 25 photos and a lengthly description of who, when and where you bought the item. If it was given to you by X, and you don't know who originally bought it you may as well toss it in the trash.
    - Do not sell items that you are not allowed to sell in violation of the license. See Microsoft Licensing, you are required to sell OEM software with a computer, not some piece of computer trash. This is a copyright violation otherwise.
    - Do not sell items in violation of trademarks or patents, this is likely what the CoS stuff is using as a legal beating stick. They (or any other rights owner) can pretty much claim that you're selling a replica up unto the point you legally prove in court they are engaging in restraint of trade.

    eBay does not enforce contractual obligations. If a seller is selling something in violation of their their contract with the company, eBay is not going to remove it. Most affiliate program RO's try this.

    The key is that the rights owner signed an agreement under purjury that they in good faith believe the seller is selling an item in violation of their intellectual property. If you can prove otherwise in court, the rights owner can't do anything to you anymore.

    There are no loopholes around the VeRO program. Sue the rights owners who overreach to invalidate their VeRO access. Some so called rights owners are really distributors and do not have the rights they claim.

    *I do not speak for eBay, this is not legal advice*

  167. Ooooh! Legal binding documents, I feel so safe. by Mspangler · · Score: 1

    I hope they were properly notarized.

    Ebay Brown races up to the football, as Lucy Scientology holds it and smiles serenely.....

  168. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Random, unsupported statements made by a stranger on the internet that bash Christianity = informative

    I calls em as I sees em.

  169. Can't sell anything fun anymore by dsmall · · Score: 1

    I suppose banning the sale of thermonuclear weapons on eBay is next . . .

        *sigh*

          One by one, our freedoms are being whittled away.

          For now, though, I can still list:

          eBay #127467:

          One W-87 warhead, good condition. May 1987 production. Canned sealed secondary. A few moving 'dings' on the casing. Nominal yield is 300 kilotons; [use the enriched U-235 sleeve (see eBay #127468) if you want 475 kilotons.]

          The RV (re-entry vehicle) is in good condition as well, with that nifty carbon-fabric nose, a new contact sensor, a carbon phenolic heatshield, and a vintage S-band antenna!

          Comes with a color 235 page manual, and is select-fusable for high, medium, or low altitude
    airburst, surface proximity airburst, or surface contact burst. Has usual category-F PAL; play "guess the combo" with your friends!

          This is truly the item for the Cold War collector. Not some recycled 50 Megaton Russian junk that's been sold around twenty countries or a huge Mark 28 that you have to keep in the garage. This is a new production gadget in its original colors! Comes with original cardboard packing!

    Just the thing for the collector! Looks great over the fireplace!

        thanks,

          Dave

  170. down on ebay by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

    This is why I've been down on ebay for several years now--every since I tried to sell my Gameboy advance programmer.  And it was deleted.

    Fuck ebay, they suck worse every year, anyway.  They've never had any notion of business ethics, ironically.

  171. Keep it legal by nonsensical · · Score: 1

    Attacking eBay won't do any good, and it's just plain stupid. Everyone who cares enough to see this through wants it done peacefully and legally. Honestly, suggesting that people attack EBay with DOS attacks suggests you are simply a CoS plant intended to give Anonymous a bad name.

    The ends do not justify the means, for the means determine the end.

  172. Re:Closing notes by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    I just left a long message for ebay explaining why I will no longer be doing business with them. The is something fishy going on between them and the church of scientology. From what I have rea previouslu, I thought ebay had some balls. I am the kind that votes with my wallet, and ebay won't be getting any more of my hard earned money, ever. Neither will paypal or skype. I am not sure why I thought my personal information was safe with ebay to begin with, but after what I read about the VeRO program, it is clear to me that the church can browse the ebay client list at will. IT would have made more sense for ebay to keep quiet about their relationship with the church. In fact the VeRO program in general bothers me a lot. If a copyright holder brought a suit against someone, they could perform discovery (IANABCL) and get what they needed if a judge agreed. Leaving the judge out of it, and giving the keys to the filing cabinet to the church makes it too easy for abuse to occur.

  173. SOP at eBay by Atario · · Score: 1

    Actually, as far as I can tell, pretty much anyone who claims to be a "content owner" ("imaginary propertyholders"?) can cancel any auction they deem not kosher, and there's pretty much not a damn thing you can do about it. Example: my wife bought some training materials from eBay. Later, she went to sell them, also on eBay. The auction was canceled by the manufacturers of the materials on the grounds that they don't allow anyone to resell the materials. Never mind that my wife was under no obligation nor contract with them; never mind that she had bought the things the exact same way without trouble. No, they stepped in and said no and no amount of arguing with eBay to the contrary nor facts relevant to the case would change the situation.

    She wound up selling them somewhere else.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:SOP at eBay by Jeruvy · · Score: 1

      Most IP owners have keywords they look for, in some cases (due to frequency) some IP owners have been giving the ability to pull ads they deem infringing. Ebay will typically take a blind eye, but if you feel mistreated you certainly can appeal. However just because one time they caught on to the action and another time they missed it, doesn't give you any 'defense'.

      Remember the rule of stolen goods; the person who's caught with the goods is the one who loses. Since the goods typically are confiscated and/or returned/auctioned, and you don't get your money back unless you can successfully sue against the entity you purchased the stolen goods from. Most cases this has to be done in a civil proceeding, but IANAL. Also remember that many auctions on eBay violate the terms and conditions of the site, most ppl just don't care about all the rules. In many cases eBay simply 'arbitrates' its decision and that's that. Don't like it, too bad it's there site. As we can see, some people do care about those rules and use them. I'm not agreeing with this decision of eBay's, but it's not an uncommon outcome either.

      If you don't like this, then you need to tell eBay about it and then shop with your feet/mouse, don't visit eBay or eBay supporting stores/sites.

      --
      Jeruvy
  174. petitions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  175. Ebay shooting its own foot in Poland too. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    On not entirely unrelated note:

    Ebay very recently introduced transaction fees in Poland.
    There would be nothing special about that if it had a monopolist position here, but it does not, by far.
    THE auction service for Poland is Allegro.pl, with easily nearly 90% of the market. Then there was Swistak.pl and then Ebay. And then two theme-specific collectibles sites. That's the market. All the "small players" compete with Allegro by being free of charge.

    With introduction of the fees the number of auctions on Ebay dropped from 400,000 to 80,000...
    why allegedly? Because if you seek ANYTHING other than 'e-book, shippable only in electronic from, world-wide' from countries outside Poland, you get only about 8000 auctions, many of them same item in multiple categories.

    Yeah, 8,000 auctions vs 3,700,000 on Allegro. 8,000 from 400,000. There have been some management changes in ebay, and they were for the worse.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  176. Add 333 by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Are you unhappy? Are you not close enough to Xenu?

    *** NOW *** Add 1nches to your 3. Your 3-tool will amaze all your friends.

    Buy here. Bue now! It's the genuine stuff, but a lot cheaper.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  177. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by dargaud · · Score: 1

    About Jesus, Buddah and more, I recommend watching the intelligent movie The man from Earth.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  178. Ebay compromised with scientology church?... by Fenice · · Score: 1

    I'm removing Skype and I'm never using that thing again. To think that a software belonging to a compagny associated with scientology have read my firefox profile... brrr

  179. Scientology @ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For me, this sounds like a scientology member payed by ebay! Bad karma for ebay...

  180. Good News Everyone! by dintech · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can just imagine a modern day equivalent:

    Zealot: Hey Hubbard, check this out...
    Hubbard: What is it?
    Zealot: It's a new device, I call it the e-meter!
    Hubbard: Whats-it-do daddy-o?
    Zealot: Well, it's actually a modified client for a popular bandwidth test except this one measures your 'theaton level'! Hehe.
    Hubbard: Wow! We can just send this client out as a world-wide spam-blanket and no more need for street canvasing! We'll be rich, rich, RICH!
    Zealot: Mwuhah... oh no! I've just thought of a problem.
    Hubbard: Oh? What's that? People won't be convinced by their super-high theaton level and immediately sign up for our brochure? We won't be able to stop re-distribution of beta versions on ebay? We can't use them to zap unbelievers into submission with? You look positively deflated my friend...
    Zealot: Mmmm, no.... half of America is on Comcast...
    Hubbard: Haha! Fear not my little novice, haven't you heard of PowerBoost?
    Zealot: Mwuhahahaa...
    Hubbard: Mwuhahahaa...
    Zealot: Mwuhahahaa...
    Hubbard: Mwuhahahaa...
    ...

  181. Two possible motives... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Ebay could be cooperating with Scientologists for tow reasons. Legal threats or the promise of rewards in later lives. These are about all that scientology gives

  182. Oh, lawyers by Schiphol · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere that the e-meter displays a sticker reading "For Religious Use Only", which must be my favourite stupid disclaimer of all times.

  183. Re:yet again the religous twats get too much say by houghi · · Score: 1

    Theologians can pursuade themselves of anything. Anyone who can worship
    a trinity and insists that his religion is a monotheism can believe
    anything -- just give him time to rationalize it.
                                                          Robert A. Heinlein, JOB: A Comedy of Justice

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  184. VERO is pretty much useless by rjwoodhead · · Score: 2, Informative

    Allow me to speak from experience - VERO is pretty much useless as a method for evil companies to enforce despotic control over the masses. In terms of furthering my nefarious plans for World Domination, it's been a total bust.

    EBay hosts many auctions of bootlegs of many of the films (anime, samurai stuff) for which my company, AnimEigo, is the US licensor (turning you all into malleable Otaku will definitely get me closer to the aforementioned end-state of World Domination). At one point, we tried using VERO to cancel these auctions. It was a total waste of time.

    1) After being VERO'd, the bootleg vendor would simply put up another auction. It was a game of whack-a-mole, and they had more time to play than I did. The time I wasted -- I could have spent it on the Orbital Mind Control Lasers.

    2) The serious bootleg vendors would simply contest the VERO. At which point the rights-holder has to provide documentation that demonstrates that the property infringes their rights. And that, folks, takes time and money -- and I need that money, do you guys have any idea how expensive it is to build and maintain a Secret Lair?

    So my advice to people who want to sell E-Meters is to contest the VERO; it requires only 10 minutes of your time filling out a form and faxing it off, and will cost the COS a considerable amount of money to take to the next step. Now, they may decide that it's worth it to them to do that, but hey, that's money they can't spend on other things - and keep in mind that for them, World Domination is a serious business, not just a hobby like it is for me.

    The real point of VERO is to protect eBay from lawsuits by rights-holders.

    --
    "World Domination - a fun, family activity"
  185. Why doesn't anonymous decompile it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. buy 1 emeter
    2. Disassemble
    3. Show parts
    4. Explain what it REALLY measures (if anything at all) ...
    5. Profit?

  186. Hey RIAA by houghi · · Score: 1

    Here is a nice way to force people to buy from you. Just forbid the sell of second hand music. I think everybody should join. That way we might get some new stupid law that preventets the preventing of selling of shit that *I* own.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  187. e-meter flood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soooo, why don't groups like Anonymous simply flood eBay with thousands of e-Meter listings or worse, e-Meter like listings that wastes CoS's resources in reviewing and or removing these listings. Turn up the noise and let em choke on the static. If they're gonna abuse a tool... remove the tools value.

      Has anyone done a tear-down on one of these suckers? What's actually in them? any parts lists? What do they cost scientology to build them? Hey, if you can do a teardown on an iPhone... I don't see that crappy lil meter as any challenge to part out.

  188. I am sorry. by xtracto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I also find it interesting how at least 90% (and I'm being generous here) of the stuff I have read online or in the media about Scientology doesn't even resemble what Scientology really is, and I have been a member for about 17 years now.

    I am sorry for you my friend. I would suggest you see the story of people who where in Scientology for more than 20 years and were even "OT7" (whatever that means). Of course, I do not know if your church allows you to see such videos. (I would not count on that.. In fact i am surprised that your CoS nanny filter allows you to get into slashdot.

    Do not get me wrong, I have nothing about the Scientology religion, it is the "church" the one I think is bad. Similarly to how the Catholic church was bad some years ago (Spanish Incquisition). I know there are groups of people that follow the same beliefs as Scientologists, but they cannot call themselves Scientologists because they would get sued (WTF?).

    And, lastly, just for curiosity, do you *really* believe in Xenu and all those things described in OT3 ?

    Hope you the best! And I really hope you remember my post in some 10 years when you get out of Scientology and look back at all the years you wasted.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  189. Xenu is a good guy, and he loves you! by jameskojiro · · Score: 2, Funny

    The CoS is a nothing more than a disinformation campaign by people opposed to the Galactic rule of Xenu.

    They use blatant lies about Xenu to build thier base up.

    The aliens Xenu sent to their firey doom weren't just ordinary citizens, they were Galactic Welfare recipients and they were a complete and total drain on the Galactic Tax system. These Aliens were given several chances to get off the welfare system and were all able to work. Xenu had them gathered up and sent to processing, they downloaded their minds into a giant computer where they could spend their eternity living off free Galactic government cheese. But what to do with their bodies? Well Xenu checked and some life bearing planets were facing peril in that they were losing carbon in their biospheres, one such planet Earth needed extra carbon, so they dropped off the brain dead bodies in volcaoes so that any any alien microbes would be sterilized and the carbon would enter the air and thus the carbon cycle. Xenu is so kind to think of us!

    The Galactic Communist party was pissed off because their lost a great deal of their voting base (the welfare recipients). Since citizens who have been virtialized only have 1/4 of a vote. So they have agents spreading lies so when Earth joins the Galactic government there are seeds of mistrust against the duly elected Galactic President Xenu who has won in landslide victory after landslide victory and is now in his 1,345,236th term in office. LRH was a recruited by an agent to spread mistrust of Xenu.

    It's all down to politics folks.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  190. Re:Don't tell Tom but by nil0lab · · Score: 1


    Please resell them on that other auction site. There still is one, isn't there?

  191. Define sect. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    In Catholic countries often Protestants are referred to as sects.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  192. Questionable search replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For extra points, do a search for "emeter" and notice how it magically becomes a search for "exeter".

    For the super-ultra-mega-prize, note that if you search for "e-meter" you find _comic books_ with both "e-meter" and "exeter" inexplicably in the description line.

    No... They haven't been up to any skullduggery at all.

  193. Subvert the system by dracosilv · · Score: 1

    They say you can't sell the meters themselves online, but that probably doesn't cover selling the schematics online.

  194. Natalie Portman naked and petrified. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OT III
    [Operating Thetan Level 3]
    BODY THETANS

    by L. Ron Hubbard

    The head of the Galactic Federation (76 planets around larger stars visible from here) (founded 95,000,000 years ago, very space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet - 178 billion on average) by mass implanting..

    He caused people to be brought to Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H-Bomb on the principal volcanos (incident II) and then the Pacific area ones were taken - in boxes to Hawaii and the Atlantic area ones to Las Palmas and there "packaged".

    His name was Xenu. He used renegades. Various misleading data by means of circuits etc was placed in the unplants. When through with his crime loyal officers (to the people) captured him after six years of battle and put him in an electronic mountain trap where he still is. "They" are gone. The place (Confederation) has since been a desert.

    The length and brutality of it all was such that this Confederation never recovered. The implant is calculated to kill (by pneumonia etc) anyone who attempts to solve it. This liability has been dispensed with by my tech development. One can freewheel through the implant and die unless it is approached as precisely outlined. The "freewheel" (auto-running on and on) lasts too long, denies sleep etc and one dies. So be careful to do only Incidents I and II as given and not plow around and fail to complete one thetan at a time.

    In December 1967 1 know someone had to take the plunge. I did and emerged very knocked out, but alive. Probably the only one ever to do so in 75,000,000 years. I have all the data now, but only that given here is needful.

    One's body is a mass of individual thetans stuck to oneself or to the body.

    One has to clean them off by running incident II and Incident I. It is a long job, requiring care, patience and good auditing.

    You are running beings. They respond like any preclear. Some large, some small.

    Thetans believed they were one. This is the primary error.

    Good luck.

    * * *

    For the purpose of clarity, by BODY THETAN is meant a thetan who is stuck to another thetan or body but is not in control.

    A THETAN is, of course, a Scientology word using the Greek theta which was the Greek symbol for thought or life. An individual being such as a man is a thetan, he is not a body and he does not think because he has a brain.

    A CLUSTER is a group of body thetans crushed or hold together by some mutual bad experience.

    ----------

    Character of Body Thetans

    Body Thetans are just Thetans. When you get rid of one he goes off and possibly squares around, picks up a body or admires daisies. He is in fact a sort of cleared Being. He cannot fail to eventually, if not at once, regain many abilities. Many have been asleep for the last 75,000,000 years. A body Thetan responds to any process any Thetan responds to.

    Some body Thetans are suppressive. A suppressive is out of valence in R6. He is in valence in Incident I almost always.

    One can't run a human being on these two incidents since human beings are composites and would not be able to run the lot. Aside from that, non-clears are way below awareness required to even find these Incidents.

    Huge amounts of charge have already been removed from the case and the body thetans by Clearing and OT I and OT II to say nothing of engrams and lower grades.

    Awareness is proportional to the charge removed from the case.

    Although a human is a composite being there is only one I (that is you) who runs things.

    Body thetans just hold one back.

    You will continue to be you. You, inside, can of course separate out body thetans and so solo auditing is the answer. How good do you have to be to run body thetans off? Well, if you didn't skip your grades, Clearing and OT II particularly, you. should be able to'command body thetans easily.

    * * *

    Incident II is over 36 days long. Capture on other planets was weeks or months before the implant. Tho

  195. FYI: by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

    You can read the Scientologist religious document concerning Jesus here:

    http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/fishman/index2.html

    Short version: They call him a pedophile with a nasty temper.

  196. Re: they overstep by edward_apovi · · Score: 1

    yeah according to ebays thing on this, there are 3 things you have to do to keep from being delisted by a copyright holder. those are:
    a. Only list authentic items
    b. Always use my own pictures and my own item description
    c. Never sell bootleg copies of software, music, movies, or video games

    source: http://pages.ebay.com/help/tutorial/verotutorial/q13.html

    so it appears they do overstep the line and it just needs brought to ebays attention. you cant prevent people from reselling your crap except in certian situations. this isnt one of them. indeed.

  197. Scientological Boobs by psibrman · · Score: 1

    The science fiction cult of scientology is a dangerous one at that. Yes, it's ok to make fun of religion. "When is Jesus Going to Bring In the Porkchops?" ...A title by George Carlin, a fellow of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. L. Ron Hubbards book, "Dianetics", is a science fiction book which is a religous bible that was created far in the future but time travel into past to be found by the first of Christ Sceintists. BALONEY! What fools and nitwits! I guess it is bad as pie in the sky or the Great Sphagetti Monster. These people need to be deprogrammed. When the money started to come in' Hubbard didn't say a word about his intentions. Could you blame him? While he was busy cha-chaing to the bank the supposed scientists were making money hand over foot. No one would state that this was just a cheap dime science fiction novel... So there up there with the mad brothers (Akmad, Momad, and Mohammad). the baptist evangelicals (with their left behind books, and I always thought they were right behinds), and the snake charmers and oil salesmen. Jesus Christ in a hand basket with a penis pump attached to him. Where do these people get off

  198. Scientological Boobs by psibrman · · Score: 1

    The science fiction cult of scientology is a dangerous one at that. Yes, it's ok to make fun of religion. "When is Jesus Going to Bring In the Porkchops?" ...A title by George Carlin, a fellow of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. L. Ron Hubbards book, "Dianetics", is a science fiction book which is a religous bible that was created far in the future but time travel into past to be found by the first of Christ Sceintists. BALONEY! What fools and nitwits! I guess it is bad as pie in the sky or the Great Sphagetti Monster. These people need to be deprogrammed. When the money started to come in Hubbard didn't say a word about his intentions. Could you blame him? While he was busy cha-chaing to the bank the supposed scientists were making money hand over foot. No one would state that this was just a cheap dime science fiction novel... So there up there with the mad brothers (Akmad, Momad, and Mohammad). the baptist evangelicals (with their left behind books, and I always thought they were right behinds), and the snake charmers and oil salesmen. Jesus Christ in a hand basket with a penis pump attached to him. Where do these people get off