Slashdot Mirror


al Qaeda Hacks XP?

acaird writes "According to this article at Newbytes, members of al Qaeda may have worked for Microsoft and planted "trojans, trapdoors, and bugs in Windows XP"." This stuff screams of hoax to me, but it is showing up on the Washington Post.

736 comments

  1. Spelling!!!!!!!!!! by Luke · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You's think that with all the headlines you could spell their organization's name correctly!

    1. Re:Spelling!!!!!!!!!! by ari_j · · Score: 1, Funny

      As bad as the spelling is here, do note that every spelling is just a transliteration from that gibberish that the terrorists are calling a language. It's not even written left-to-right, for crying out loud!

    2. Re:Spelling!!!!!!!!!! by Transient0 · · Score: 1

      The spelling in English is irrellevant. it is all trans-literation. As long as the sound you make when you vocalize it is somewhat close to the original, it doesn't matter.

    3. Re:Spelling!!!!!!!!!! by bahtama · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As a wise man from the simpsons would say:

      "There is no groaning in my store"

      When I read comments like this, I think of the lovable Comic Book Guy, so anal about everything. Get over the mispellings, no one is perfect, not CNN, not the BBC and not Slashdot. Besides, what is the word, "You's?" Does the think belong to You, or maybe it should read, "You is think... Ohhh, look, I can be anal and picky as well!

      --

      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
      Oh bother.

    4. Re:Spelling!!!!!!!!!! by _DMan_ · · Score: 1

      Even the Associated Press and Reuters are unsure of the correct spelling :)

    5. Re:Spelling!!!!!!!!!! by pa-guy · · Score: 1

      When I read articles like this I think of conspiracy guy from Space channel. What ever happened to him? He was hilarious....

    6. Re:Spelling!!!!!!!!!! by dup_account · · Score: 1

      So is everyone who reads arabic a terrorist? If terrorists write in english does that make english gibberish?

    7. Re:Spelling!!!!!!!!!! by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, english is enough of a gibberish tongue on it's own without terrorists. :)

    8. Re:Spelling!!!!!!!!!! by MadAhab · · Score: 2

      You got it. The only way to respond to a troll is with a better troll. Oh, wait, did I just hit "submit"? Damn.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  2. Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    Honestly, things are getting pretty bad for MS if this sort of thing can be published without even a public whipping. :-)

    If this goes on..."Next week on Jerry Springer: Bill Gates is sleeping with my sister!"

    1. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by LordKariya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mohammad Afroze William Abdul Razzak Gates, Jr, arrested by Mumbai (Bombay) police Oct. 2, has admitted to helping plot gaping OS security holes in India, Britain and Australia, India's Hindustan Times newspaper reported Saturday.

      There you have it, indisputable proof that Gates and bin Laden are allies.

      --
      I alternate between posting +5 and -1 Comments. Karma: +53 -47 = 6
    2. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1

      I wonder where the retraction will be printed...

      Normally those things are buried on like page 9 in really small type...

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    3. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well the way I figure it, they are paranoid enough that someone at MS will try to find out if this is ture or not

      And they will find that there is no way to tell if there are Al-Qeada moles, trap doors, bugs, etc. - the difference between that and normal operation may be minimal at best.

      That may be the Al-qeada plan to destroy America. make sure all MS products stop working after a certain date

      ;-)

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    4. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Washington is known for publishing stupid untrue articles. They belong in the same section with the Inquirer!

    5. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ..."Next week on Jerry Springer: Bill Gates is sleeping with my sister!"

      Your sister too?! Boy Sis is goin' to be mad when she hears there is another!

    6. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real truth:

      Microsoft found out about it. It was then decided that it was a good idea so they left it in. The basic idea was they can sell you the fixes--if you don't buy eventually your software will expire because they'll change the it so it does.

    7. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by tulare · · Score: 1
      According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code.


      rotfl
      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    8. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by blackholebrain · · Score: 1
      This IS Microsoft PR... think about it:

      If XP fails, now they can blame it on terrorists, and even get Uncle Sam to bail them out too!!!

      --
      <---[singularity sig]
    9. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by GTRacer · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That may be the Al-qeada plan to destroy America. make sure all MS products stop working after a certain date...

      What, you mean Microsoft Product Activation and Passport subscriptions?

      GTRacer
      - How much for WinXP Corporate?

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    10. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > That may be the Al-qeada plan to destroy America. make sure all MS products stop working after a certain date

      Huh? Last time I checked, Al Queda wanted to destroy the technological world, not save it!

    11. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Well, they didn't say they were effective processes, just rigorous.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    12. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by God_Retired · · Score: 0

      Uh, wouldn't that be "Bill Gates is sleeping with HIS sister!"?

      No I don't know if he has a sister and I don't care.

    13. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Cosmix · · Score: 1

      The fools! That will only make us stronger.

    14. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Interesting


      > Well the way I figure it, they are paranoid enough that someone at MS will try to find out if this is ture or not

      > And they will find that there is no way to tell...

      Yes, but at least they will qualify for 3 or 4 billion dollars of disaster relief funding, and a play for sympathy may get them a reduced wrist slap from the DoJ.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    15. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe Ballmer's dance is part of the process, that looked fairly rigorous. It also didn't look too terribly effective.

    16. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That sounds like Red Hat's revenue generating plan too.

    17. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Tasty+Beef+Jerky · · Score: 0

      Yep, like that whole Watergate thing. That was pure bullshit!

      --

      I'm the tasty treat nobody can resist!
      IM Me! AOL IM:Tasty Beef Jerky

    18. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason to use linux?

    19. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by isomeme · · Score: 2
      That may be the Al-qeada plan to destroy America. make sure all MS products stop working after a certain date.
      No, that's RMS's plan to free America.
      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    20. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by IdleMindUI · · Score: 0, Redundant
      That may be the Al-qeada plan to destroy America. make sure all MS products stop working after a certain date.

      Oh, so XP works now?
    21. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Law sez the retraction is written at the same place with the same font as the original post.

    22. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Huh? Last time I checked, Al Queda wanted to destroy the technological world, not save it!

      What? I thought they were only interested in destroying the US! Oh, uh, right, I love Big Brother.

    23. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would you know the difference if they did?

    24. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "make sure all MS products stop working after a certain date." Are they partners? I thought thats what Microsoft tended to do.

    25. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Morocco+Mole · · Score: 1

      PR Agency? They are still reeling from the public response to the awful flying-nun/user XP commercials! --Richard

    26. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by gatesh8r · · Score: 1

      But they are going on a jihad against the infidels of technology!

      --
      Karma whorin' since 1999
    27. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by antadam · · Score: 1

      that'd probably make m$ happy since they wanted to sell time out licenses...besides if bugs were actually put into xp they probably fixed half the problems xp has anyways...not like you'd be able to tell which was a bug they planted considering everything m$ makes crashes anyways.

    28. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      > > Well the way I figure it, they are paranoid enough that
      > > someone at MS will try to find out if this is true or not
      > > And they will find that there is no way to tell...

      > Yes, but at least they will qualify for 3 or 4 billion dollars of
      > disaster relief funding, and a play for sympathy may get them
      > a reduced wrist slap from the DoJ.

      Please, don't you think those terrorists have gotten enough breaks?

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    29. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by allanj · · Score: 1

      That may be the Al-qeada plan to destroy America. make sure all MS products stop working after a certain date


      Like, say, the release date? Face it - then al-qaeda has been doing this for a long time :-)

      --
      Black holes are where God divided by zero
    30. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say Microsoft is already doing a good enough job of making sure there software doesn't work past a certain date on their own.:)

    31. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      Funny thing is that it probably wouldn't actually be such a bad thing. I mean, consider the worst-case scenario in the computer industry, then think about where we're headed. Not much different, eh?

    32. Re:Where the hell is Microsoft's PR agency? by kannibul · · Score: 1

      Would these back doors in XP be called caves? Look at the obvious problems with the raw sockets and administrator rights (on home edition). http://grc.com/dos/sockettome.htm for reference

  3. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! by bonzoesc · · Score: 1, Funny

    In other news, the moon landings were faked, Linux is quickly taking over the desktop, and Nintendo's GameCube has surpassed the PS2 in sales.

    1. Re:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! by susano_otter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      100k 0u+ d00d i w177 h0@x0r j00!!!

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is quickly taking over the desktop, everywhere except the USA...

    3. Re:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people are fighting at the border to leave the United States and run a Third World desktop on their PCs.

    4. Re:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone who seriously believes the moon landings were faked should be sent back to high school for remedial science....

    5. Re:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      > 100k 0u+ d00d i w177 h0@x0r j00!!!

      Babelfish 133+ h4x0r to english transletion:
      Observe outside dude I will chop down juice.

    6. Re:AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Silly babelfish. That's hoaxor, not haxor...

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  4. Doesn't seem likely by qurob · · Score: 0

    I live in the states and can't get DSL, but they can get hack Microsoft from caves? Anything IS possible though

    1. Re:Doesn't seem likely by Warvi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Al Queda is not just terrorists in afghanistan. They are all around the world. They have well educated, smart people well capable of getting jobs at Microsoft.

      --


      Consistency is overrated.
    2. Re:Doesn't seem likely by schon · · Score: 1

      They have well educated, smart people well capable of getting jobs at Microsoft.

      [sarcasm]
      Doesn't being well-educated and smart immediately disqualify you from working at MS? :o)
      [/sarcasm]

      Sorry, had to be said :o)

    3. Re:Doesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it disqualifies you from having an account on Slashdot.

    4. Re:Doesn't seem likely by Ooblek · · Score: 1

      I showed this article to my wife and told her I could be home more often if we sold the house and moved into a cave in Afghanistan with DSL. I don't think she's going to go for it. My guess is that whole parachute jump to work every morning for her isn't her ideal method of commuting to work.

  5. not as easy as you might think by psyklopz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Speaking as a programmer who works for a big software company, it's unlikely that anything like that would be able to get through.

    Code generally goes through peer reviews and quality assurance before it is accepted into the main stream. Say waht you want about MS, but I'm sure they do these things (they can afford it!)

    To bypass these failsafes would require a lot of people along the line allowing it to slip through.

    1. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yeah, right. All code gets peer reviewed, and it's also verified that the version that's peer reviewed is exactly what's under source control, and QA reads code? That's a fucking joke.

      QA generally does not read any code at all, they take the specs for how a routine works, and maybe write some regression tests to make sure it does what it's supposed to, and breaks properly. There's no digging around in the code itself.

      As for peer review, when it happens (which it doesn't for every line of code by a long shot) they don't make sure that nobody ever updates that code again without more peer review.

      While I don't believe the allegation for a second, it's definitely extremely possible.

    2. Re:not as easy as you might think by oddjob · · Score: 5, Funny

      So something like a flight simulator in a spreadsheet program would never make it into a released product...

      Back under your bridge, troll.

    3. Re:not as easy as you might think by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This thing is clearly a hoax, but..

      I don't think this would be all that difficult. It's not like the hack has to be obvious. You wouldn't put something like:

      if( strcmp( username, "osama" ) ) { uid=0; }

      That would be too obvious.

      But something more subtle in the logic could easily get through, given the number of such bugs that have made it through without deliberate sabotage.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    4. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

      Hmm. Im porting this anonymously for obvious reasons, but the larger the company and the larger the codebase, the easier this sort of thing becomes. Some software also tends to have certain areas which are very active in development and other areas (eg - backwards compatibility cruft) which often goes untouched for years. A company who say has a large codebase which contains lots of legacy code for compatibility reasons would make the easiest targer.
      Note: I said easiest target, not an neccesarily an easy target.

      This threas is likely to generate lots of posts like "well if we had the source, this would be impossible". Moderators: before you write these off as "linux zealots" and send them to -1 flamebait, please take a moment to try and find a hole in their argument first.

      ..

    5. Re:not as easy as you might think by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

      I dunno, it could be argued that the engineers that worked on the components of MS Office have in the past slipped in MANY the easter eggs into the product that went unnoticed.

      I could also see how it could be done. a simple #progma and redefinition of a core Win32 API function placed in something as silly as stdafx.h might just slip by.

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    6. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So something like a flight simulator in a spreadsheet program would never make it into a released product...

      But they did forget to put tall buildings into that spreadshit...

      Back under your bridge, troll.

      The Golden Gate Bridge is still standing...

    7. Re:not as easy as you might think by ianezz · · Score: 4, Funny
      if( strcmp( username, "osama" ) ) { uid=0; }

      Poor ``osama'' user... every other user instantly becomes root, except for him (sorry, couldn't resist - but this is another reason why strcmp() is pure evil sometimes) ;-)

    8. Re:not as easy as you might think by Computer! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a fucking joke.

      While I'd admit that QA in professional software is lacking, there are definately source code reviews in an OS product group. Every line of code is looked at, even if only briefly. The risk of the exploit being detected and erased before a release is too great for the Microsoft interview process (grueling, trust me) to be worthwhile. Especially if the coder is a new employee. It is highly unlikely that a new programmer even wrote a single line of compiled OS code. Most of the time, they are writing tools or test scripts for years before they get to write OS code. Insinuating that someone's entire career was a setup in order to get caught planting some bugs in Windows is a lot more ridiculous than claiming this is a hoax.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    9. Re:not as easy as you might think by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      Code generally goes through peer reviews and quality assurance before it is accepted into the main stream. Say waht you want about MS, but I'm sure they do these things (they can afford it!)

      I'm sure they do it, but a few minutes using any of their products will show you how well they do it.

      The bigquestion is how would anyone tell the evil terrorist bugs nd security holes from the normal microsoft incompeitence bugs and security holes.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    10. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      strcmp ?!?!

      Didn't you know WinXP was written in Visual Basic?
      Why else would it be so slow and bloated.

    11. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #progma?

      Was that a typo or are you just another slashbot who skimmed the K&R book at B&N so you could bluff C experience?

    12. Re:not as easy as you might think by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

      DoH! I have NO idea why I said that. Of course I meant one of the dozens of #pragma warning statement you can make to the Visual C++ NOT issue warmings regarding things such as redefinition of a function declared elsewhere, etc..

      You know, the kinds you need to use to manage to include the STL in Visual C++ without generating hundreds of warnings. 8-)

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    13. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. You're right to point it out.

      Yet another slashbot who skimmed some C code once upon a time and now thinks they can use it to get +1 Funny from a bunch of knuckle-dragging Perl hacks who don't know any better.

      It was bad enough when Slashdot was filled with hypocrite thieves. Now we have to deal with people pretending to know things they clearly don't.

    14. Re:not as easy as you might think by bonzoesc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Easter Eggs aren't terrorist exploits. They're usually harmless, and are basically there to make people say "neato" or something like that. Besides, the QA people are listed in the credits, too.

    15. Re:not as easy as you might think by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, but they establish the principle that programmers can hide just about anything they damn well want in commercial software.

    16. Re:not as easy as you might think by fantastic · · Score: 1

      It is not *easy* but I've seen it done, don't forget Microsoft pay peanuts to testers on the payroll, you can only make a good salary by going contracting.

      And when you only pay peanuts you get monkeys, or was it elephants?...

    17. Re:Not as easy as you might think by GSloop · · Score: 1

      You say...
      ========
      Thirdly, as you said, even if some programmers with less than noble intentions did manage to get employed at Microsoft
      ========

      That would include Steve Ballmer and Bill?
      (I know, I suspect Ballmer couldn't code to save his life, but that never stopped MS before...)

    18. Re:not as easy as you might think by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      While I'd admit that QA in professional software is lacking, there are definately source code reviews in an OS product group.

      Hahahahahaha!!!

      I used to work for an OS development group. I was fresh out of grad school and was hired to write a number of drivers and kernel subsystems. Trust me, if someone wanted to sneak in a Trojan or back door of some kind, it could be done -- easily.

      Operating systems are too large to have every line of code examined by other programmers. In many cases, you just have to trust one person to write a bunch of code.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    19. Re:not as easy as you might think by morcego · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not sure.
      You see, I work for a not so big software company right now, but I used to.
      It's not that hard to sneak some malicious code into the final product. Quality Arrusance is usualy made only by using the software, not by analising the code. And even if they do analise the code, it's quite trivial to introduce some obscure buffer overflow.
      Also, we are forced to remember about that hacking of microsoft internal network some time ago, which they "claimed" give the hackers no access to the code base.
      I hate bin Laden as much as the next guy, and think he should die. But, even being a fanactic, the guy is inteligent. And has recources, both personel and money. I think it's very likely he would attempt something like this. I know, in his shoes, I would.

      --
      morcego
    20. Re:not as easy as you might think by firewort · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Just cause I'm curious,

      Did you work on OS/2 development? I've seen your other posts and know that you're among the last outposts of people placing their faith in OS/2.

      --

    21. Re:not as easy as you might think by L-Wave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      its quite possible the code reviewers know the eaaster egg is THERE, usually code reviews are done by co-programmers, not management.

      --
      I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
    22. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the functions from strings.h are pure evil I'm afraid. They were placed there by Al Queda operatives in order to introduce bugs (Which clearly works, see our friend above)!

      Thankfully, C++ comes to the rescue with std::string:

      if(username=="osama")
      uid=0;

    23. Re:Not as easy as you might think by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the first place, I notice that man is a "suspected" Al Qaeda member. From what I've been seeing lately, anyone who has the wrong kind of accent or a copy of the Koran is a suspected Al Qaeda Member.

      Ok, but when you pick the suspected Al Qaeda member up, and he says "I'm an Al Qaeda member, and I'd like to enter a formal confession in court, so I can blather on about the evils of western 'civilization' before proudly marching off to die a martyr in your jails", you can excuse journalists for thinking he might really mean it.

    24. Re:not as easy as you might think by benedict · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People who are willing to eat flaming death aren't
      likely to be daunted by the Microsoft interview process.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    25. Re:Not as easy as you might think by GTRacer · · Score: 2
      I suspect Ballmer couldn't code to save his life...

      Yeah, but the boy can dance like no pasty overweight man before or since! "Give me a D! Give me an E!"

      GTRacer
      - Doin' it for the tech writers!

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    26. Re:not as easy as you might think by Francis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, right. All code gets peer reviewed, and it's also verified that the version that's peer reviewed is exactly what's under source control, and QA reads code? That's a fucking joke.

      I used to work for Microsoft as a dev. (Visual Studio) Although coding practices vary from group to group, many (including our team) have mandatory code reviews before submitting, including ours.

      Noone would personaly verify that the peer reviewed version is exactly what's under source control, but come on. Groups are tight knit. You're always going through each other's code on a daily basis. You plant a Trojan, you're going to get caught.

      Let's face it. These Al Quaeda has enough problems smuggling weapons onto airplanes. Try smuggling a programmer through a Micrsoft interview process. M$ job interviews are notoriously tough. You would get more bang for the buck building a bomb and giving the federal reserve a good shaking. (No pun intended)

      --

      --
      #include <malloc.h>
      free(your.mind);
    27. Re:not as easy as you might think by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Informative
      Code generally goes through peer reviews and quality assurance before it is accepted into the main stream.

      Where is this wonderful place you work?

      I've worked for, lessee, eight companies over the years, ranging from the tiny to mammoth international corporations. Only two had code reviews.

      At one, a well known company in the computer security field, code for a secure operating system base was reviewed by trust engineers - who were knowledgeable about the theory of security but who were not so knowledgeable about the programming language being use. We'd get questions like "what does char somecstring[16]; somecstring[0] = char(0); mean"?

      At the other, a well-known aerospace contractor, reviews of code for a NASA project focused on making sure that your code met the formatting standards required - no one asked me anything at all about the semantics of my code.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    28. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto.
      I work at the largest company in the country where I live. I am currently _solely_ in charge of maintainance of over 2 million lines of code, which has so many bugs it's a full time job, and I change hundreds of lines every week.
      I don't even work for the company - I'm a subcontractor.

      _Nothing_ would be impossible to do.

      Anonymous, obviously

    29. Re:not as easy as you might think by Jason+Earl · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whatever. Excel used to have a flight simulator embedded in it, for crying out loud! IIS had a back door password of "Netscape Engineers are Weenies" spelled backwords.

      Not to mention the fact that it seems like Windows has an exploit approximately every 3.5 seconds, and that's without access to the source. A terrorist at Microsoft wouldn't even have to try and embed backdoors into the software. They could just keep track of the exploitable buffer overflows and pass them on to their buddies instead of raising attention to them at Microsoft. Microsoft's entire defense stems around the fact that the "bad guys" don't have access to the code and must therefore guess where the problems are (and even still they have more than their share of problems). Someone on the inside (with access to the source) could easily subvert this process.

    30. Re:not as easy as you might think by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      of course they know it's there... They're just there to entertain the users - it's a feature, not a bug...

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    31. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. I've worked for Microsoft, and very little of their code is "peer-reviewed." In fact, none of the companies I've worked for (as a programmer) have even seen 50% of their *released* code rewieved.

      Away with you. If you're really interested in peer-reviewed code, check out some of the major Open Source projects. It's not perfect, but it's far better than any company I've worked for.

    32. Re:not as easy as you might think by fredrik70 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ROTFL! God, if I had mod points I would mod you up!!

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    33. Re:not as easy as you might think by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Easter Eggs aren't terrorist exploits. They're usually harmless, and are basically there to make people say "neato" or something like that. Besides, the QA people are listed in the credits, too.

      Yeah, if I were putting a terroristic exploit in the code I would probably list someone from QA in the credits as well.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    34. Re:not as easy as you might think by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 1
      it's unlikely that anything like that would be able to get through.

      Agreed. That would not be the vector. Too difficult, and too risky.
      Instead, an insider would identify likely targets (network stack, email integration, etc) and search for pre-existing vulnerabilities. Access to the internal problem reporting system would be very helpful in this. It would not only allow such an insider to locate exploitable code quickly, but also to easily assess the impact, size of the penetratable installed base, and probability that the exploit will soon be patched.

      It's the same problem open source projects face; as predicted, closing the source only make it a little harder to find the problems and a lot harder to fix them.

      The main difference (open vs. closed source) lies in the fix process. For a commercial company to provide a fix, it must go through the same rigorous (if any) peer reviews and packaging that the original release faced (otherwise the patches can become the exploit vector). This also makes it easier for an insider to decide which exploits are not going to get fixed (generally all priority 1's will be fixed before any but the incidental priority 2's) and which systems are still vulnerable (patch_level<=17) whereas in open source, vulnerabilities are fixed according to the designer's pride (unaffected by budgetary cycles) and patched on various systems at various different times.

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    35. Re:not as easy as you might think by Ratbert42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I worked for a software company and put a time bomb into one of their products, just to show it could be done. Even when they knew it was in there and what it did, they couldn't find it for hours. I pointed to the exact code and they still didn't understand what it did, but someone said "oh yeah, I saw that last week and thought it looked odd." I doubt he did (such a bullshitter), but even if he had, he wouldn't have figured it out. He would have given up and ignored it. Not anymore. And that's with a team of under 5 people touching that product. Imagine a team the size of the WinXP one.

    36. Re:not as easy as you might think by enlessblab · · Score: 1

      I think that they should have put in a switch(s) that open up XP for all to use etc (there must be some buit in debug code that is buit in to XP and ways to turn off certain serial number features etc.

    37. Re:Not as easy as you might think by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Said programmer wouldn't have to be an al Qaeda member, if there's one vulnerable to blackmail/extortion tactics. He wouldn't even have to be aware of a connection, if this were a false-flag operation -- playing on possible loyalties to the FBI, Mossad, or whoever else the programmer might be biased towards.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    38. Re:Not as easy as you might think by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Of course, bein gan al queda member...what does that even mean?

      Does it mean you are a terrorist (as in a person who actually commits the act), or a planner, or just some vague resource ("SOmeday, and this day may never come, you may be asked to do a service"). Perhaps the guy is working at Microsoft because he needs a day job while he awaits orders, or does some other task on the side.

      Look at the recent tape of Ossama Bin Laden. The people who hijacked the planes had no idea what was going on until it was time to do it. They got training and got ready, but they had no idea what the mission was until just beforehand.

      I think its reasonable to assume that many "Al Queda" are just "sleeper" agents, waiting to be activated, and living otherwise normal lives in the mean time.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    39. Re:Not as easy as you might think by denzo · · Score: 1
      And you still get the result of people being afraid to fly or afraid to use Windows.
      So that's why Microsoft advertised people flying in their XP TV commercials...
    40. Re:not as easy as you might think by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's assuming that the terrorists would actually have to plant backdoors. It would be far less dangerous, and far easier, to simply look for buffer overflows and then not report them to management. What good is a peer review if your "peer" is actually looking for exploitable code for their own ends. A remotely exploitable buffer overflow is every bit as good as a backdoor, and if they were in QA they wouldn't even have to write it themselves, they would simply have to let it slide through.

      Now, I am not saying that the Al Qaeda has penetrated Microsoft, but I can't imagine that someone working at Microsoft hasn't been tempted to simply overlook a buffer overflow. Especially now that Windows is being used to run some very tempting targets.

    41. Re:not as easy as you might think by Znork · · Score: 2

      This isnt beyond al Qaeda in any way. These arent your random acts of terrorism but long-term plans, so they could easily have had sleepers inside MS for more than half a decade (who could be anywhere they wished. I doubt MS practices random reassignment and random teaming, since that would be a good way to make anyone not a terrorist quit).

      MS could do nothing to prevent it. QA doesnt catch maliciously coded bugs, it barely catches the easy bugs with regression tests. Peer review would have to be two or three people meticulously inspecting every programmers code (it's often slower to read and understand code than it is to write it), and the interaction it has with other parts of code. That just wont happen anywhere. If you're lucky you have someone else going over the code for simple mistakes, or looking through it to find a known bug.

      And just imagine the fun. 10-20 random root attacks with no available fix, and then inject 5 worms like NIMDA with multiple transmission ways at the same time in different networks in different parts of the world. By the time the anti-virus companies get in order and realize it's more than one or two worms it will be far too late. There wouldnt be a MS machine running in the world after a few hours. Combine it with internal sabotage at MS and it would be weeks or months before service would be back... and then... do it again... and again...

    42. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peer reviews? Quality assurance? Ha! You, sir, are most definitely not employed by a software company.

    43. Re:not as easy as you might think by morcego · · Score: 3, Interesting

      After some obtuse comments on my post, I stopped to think what I would do if I was a terrorist and decided to do this kind of stuff (sabotage WinXP).
      That lead me to some considerations:

      1- The sabotage would have to be enough so it's usage (or saying I would use it) would cause terror
      2- The sabotage would have to be small enough it would pass quality assurance without arousing a flag
      3- The sabotage would have to be generic enough so nobody would spot it at a first glance
      4- The exploit would have to be complicated enough so nobody else would be able to exploit it before I do
      5- This sabotage would have to take a form, or permit some kind of use, that would let me claim responsability for the terrorist act
      6- If I could do something misleading, so that when I first attacked, the the original sabotage
      would not be found, even after the attack, the better

      So, considering all this point, I want to reduce my rating from "Very Probable" to simply "Technicaly Factible".

      Unless they are very stupid. Which maybe they are, just like me posting this kind of thing with the FBI sensors and such monitoring everything.

      If they arest me for this post, please, let the slashdotters know about it.

      Or could it be I'm simply violating the DMCA ?

      --
      morcego
    44. Re:Not as easy as you might think by rho · · Score: 2
      From what I've been seeing lately, anyone who has the wrong kind of accent or a copy of the Koran is a suspected Al Qaeda Member.

      Well, to be fair, there aren't many Al Qaeda members with red hair and freckles who speak in an Irish brogue.

      When you're looking for Islamic fundamentalist terrorists, you don't go looking in the VFW hall or round up the Penn State synchronized swimming team.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    45. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, OS/2 is fuckin' gay. I helped write Netware! w00t!

      -- LordNimon

    46. Re:not as easy as you might think by hawk · · Score: 3, Interesting
      >Speaking as a programmer who works for a big
      >software company, it's unlikely that anything
      > like that would be able to get through.


      Speaking as a director of the Federal Aviation Authority, it's unlikely that four planes could be simultaneuously hijacked and . . .


      hawk, not really an FAA official

    47. Re:not as easy as you might think by jafac · · Score: 2

      there is a "code review" process that can and does take place in some large software companies.

      Generally done AFTER the stringent release deadline was met. Engineers will review eachother's codes looking for problems.

      But sometimes this process is abbreviated to fix bugs, or move on to the next release to add features so they can compete in the "checkbox war".

      It's certainly far from foolproof.
      I would also say that in general terms, there is a philosophical engineering difference between a company that has an "engineering focus" and a company that has a "marketing focus" (do the execs come from an engineering background? or do they have MBAs?). Since the company I'm familliar with was a merger of two companies of different "type", I see teams with lineage from one or the other orginal company, and years later, they retain their original philosophical alignment.
      Microsoft is a strongly "marketing focussed" company. I wouldn't count too strongly on a rigorous code-review process going on there.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    48. Re:not as easy as you might think by dark_panda · · Score: 2

      What about OpenBSD? Supposedly, their code auditing is pretty thorough.

      J

    49. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So something like a flight simulator in a spreadsheet program would never make it into a released product...

      I've read (a while back; don't have the source, but I found it while looking for egg sites) that Microsoft put the hammer down on Easter Eggs beginning with the 2K line. So your point is negated, unless you know otherwise.

    50. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhh ya..... Like all those people reviewing the code let all those nonexistent BUGS get through.

    51. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to be troll but... you might said:
      if( !strcmp( username, "osama" ) )
      {
      uid=0;
      }

    52. Re:not as easy as you might think by jayhawk88 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I'm sure Bill was real pissed when the lid was blown off that little hack.

      Get a clue. If your a PHB code reviewer at MS, there's a big difference between finding out your programmers have actually been having a little fun on the job with a hidden easter egg, and trying to figure out the functionality of backdoorforallah.dll.

    53. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh dude, while some of your post is at least vaguely plausible, though I doubt it. I don't know many software engineers that would be scheming "oh boy, code review time, I'm gonna overlook some buffer overflows so I can beat the script kiddies to the chase when the product is released".


      But the assertion that QA people are a) reviewing code itself meaningfully and b) capable of spotting a buffer overflow exploit is laughable to me. If they could do that, they wouldn't be in QA.

    54. Re:not as easy as you might think by gmack · · Score: 1

      You mean to tell me that overide debugging passwords like "Netscape programmers are weenies!" never ever make it into released code?

    55. Re:not as easy as you might think by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

      Code generally goes through peer reviews and quality assurance before it is accepted into the main stream. Say waht you want about MS, but I'm sure they do these things (they can afford it!)


      Mod this redundant if you will but given the QUANTITY of hotfixes I've had to apply to IE and Outlook alone this year it is hard for me to believe there is any kind of code review at all. Unless someone who is intentionally planting a back door has a function defined as void SecretAlQaedaBackdoor() how is review catch it? They're having a hard enough time catching common exploitable things such as buffer overflows.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    56. Re:Not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha...now if more people would understand this thinking we wouldn't be labled for racial profiling... I don't agree with profiling most of the time, but this is getting ridiculous...

    57. Re:not as easy as you might think by mpe · · Score: 2

      Code generally goes through peer reviews and quality assurance before it is accepted into the main stream. Say waht you want about MS, but I'm sure they do these things (they can afford it!)

      This sounds fine, but how does it explain things such as "Easter Eggs"? These can be a lot more sophisticated that a "back door"...

    58. Re:not as easy as you might think by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Yes, they do. And that's why they have a reputation for it. They're known as the OS that reviews every line of code. If everyone did it, it wouldn't be a big deal.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    59. Re:not as easy as you might think by mpe · · Score: 2

      This sabotage would have to take a form, or permit some kind of use, that would let me claim responsability for the terrorist act

      Except that this is supposedly the action of al Qaeda. Which isn't exactly known for claiming responsibility.

    60. Re:not as easy as you might think by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    61. Re:not as easy as you might think by jmv · · Score: 2

      Code generally goes through peer reviews and quality assurance before it is accepted into the main stream. Say waht you want about MS, but I'm sure they do these things (they can afford it!)

      Oh yeah, that's why they caught the "seineew era sreenigne epacsteN" ("Netscape enrineers are weenies" backdoor for the memory-impared), right?

      If that can get through, I guess anything can.

    62. Re:not as easy as you might think by spudnic · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, just have the plant find the backdoors that where already in place for use by the FBI/CIA/insert your favorite org here.

      You know there's got to be some in there. That would be some powerful information.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    63. Re:Not as easy as you might think by ptrourke · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, there aren't many Al Qaeda members with red hair and freckles who speak in an Irish brogue.

      Maybe not, but there are plenty of IRA members who have red hair and freckles . .

    64. Re:not as easy as you might think by pz · · Score: 1

      ... and what about the story that the original BSD code had a backdoor
      which *almost* made it into distribution where the compiler had a hack that
      would recognize when it was compiling the compiler, and would insert code
      into the compiler that would then, when compiled, recognize when it was
      compiling login and insert code into login that would allow a backdoor from
      the login prompt. Security through obscurity, so to speak.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    65. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      put the hammer down on Easter Eggs

      "put the hammer down" means go fast, as is "press the accelerator to the floor".

    66. Re:not as easy as you might think by btellier · · Score: 2

      Dude, you're out of your mind if you think that introducing a bug that will get past QA isn't possible. When all the engineers at Microsoft can't take the strcpy()'s and sprintf()'s out of IIS, you think they're really gonna notice an off-by-one buffer overflow in a nested while{}?

      Look people, it's not as though this guy has to do IF USER = BLADEN THEN GIVEADMINACCESS(), he simply has to change a buffer size to a few bytes smaller or something similar. Particularly in things like IIS it would be really easy to introduce a hole that it would take ages for competant MS auditors to find, much less the asm hackers on the scene.

    67. Re:Not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats because youve never been victimized.
      If you have been picked on because of your
      name or race or background, then you would
      be making different comments. How about
      we start getting members of penn state
      swimming team profiled because they look
      like Johny walker? I bet you fit that profile.

    68. Re:Not as easy as you might think by spudnic · · Score: 1

      He also warned of an upcoming attack on Indian Parliament and it went off just like he said it would. Lucky guess? Maybe. I'm not totally sure that someone doesn't attack Indian Parliament every other week.

      It does lend some grain of credibility to his claim.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    69. Re:not as easy as you might think by morcego · · Score: 1

      I know that, and that was on my original comment.
      The problem is that we are not talking about Joe hacker, but about a terrorist group with an agenda of its own. So, we have to question what a use they could make of somethine like that.
      If this is really another buffer overflow, people would say: "Heck, another nasty MS bug", and go on with their mediocre lives.
      Terrorits commits acts to make an statement. You see, however distorted it is, they have a goal. If they simply put something in the code that creates just the same kind of havok Win users have at least once a month, it would give then no advantage. I never heard of a terrorist that attacked out of pure pleasure.
      I don't think we will ever see a terrorist using CFC sprays just to hurt the ozone layer, just making noises on NY. That is already there, nothing they can gain with it.

      --
      morcego
    70. Re:Not as easy as you might think by mpe · · Score: 2

      Look at the recent tape of Ossama Bin Laden. The people who hijacked the planes had no idea what was going on until it was time to do it. They got training and got ready, but they had no idea what the mission was until just beforehand.

      It has even been implied that only those actually piloting the planes knew the actual plan anyway.

    71. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They're known as the OS that reviews every line of code"

      They might be 'known' as that by sycophantic fanboys, but it's not true. Most of OBSD's audit was done with scripts and not human review.

      Read this: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/188474

      Frankly. my respect to Theo went way down. This code had never been read
      through, let alone audited. And that's the core kernel. Moreover, the
      same bugs had been fixed in FreeBSD half a year ago.

    72. Re:not as easy as you might think by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      Oh, those companies where the execs come from engineering backgrounds and don't bother with MBAs are the ones going out of business....

    73. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello FUDBoy -- The Netscape Weenie thing wasn't really a password, and certainly wasn't a backdoor. It was a string that your real password was XORed with for obscurity purposes for the cases when you weren't using MS Domain authentication (and then, like all HTTP authorization stuff, ideally used over SSL for some semblance of 'real' security.)

      But I have no doubt you'll be sitting around in the old folkshome in 2030 babbling about 'M$ BaXorD00Red with Netscape Weenies', so I guess I'm wasting my breath with the facts.

    74. Re:not as easy as you might think by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      it was actualy "!seineew era sremmargorp epacsteN" hidden in some random DLL

    75. Re:not as easy as you might think by seanadams.com · · Score: 2

      And even if they do analise the code...

      Microsost *must* be "analising" their code. It's totaly shit, and they charge "per anum" for the license.

    76. Re:not as easy as you might think by psamuels · · Score: 1
      it was actualy "!seineew era sremmargorp epacsteN" hidden in some random DLL

      Sheesh, if you're gonna correct someone, get your facts straight. It was "Netscape engineers", not "Netscape programmers".

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    77. Re:not as easy as you might think by Computer! · · Score: 2


      People who are willing to eat flaming death aren't
      likely to be daunted by the Microsoft interview process.


      Unlike eating flaming death, you have to be good at something to get hired by Microsoft. Namely: programming. So, no, flaming death-eaters wouldn't get a job at Microsoft. They wouldn't be afraid of the interview, just unlikely to make it through. Nice karma whoring, though. Thanks, moderators for helping.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    78. Re:Not as easy as you might think by zCyl · · Score: 2

      Well, to be fair, there aren't many Al Qaeda members with red hair and freckles who speak in an Irish brogue.

      To be equally fair, statistically speaking there are practically no islamic arabs who are members of Al Qaeda either. Do a little division. It's like saying Finish people are kernel developers, or that people who are U.S. citizens work for Microsoft.

    79. Re:not as easy as you might think by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Every time someone says something about Microsoft's Peer Review.. I can only think of one thing to say. "Netscape Engineers Are Weenies"

      Proof positive that MS has no peer review or code auditing to speak of.

    80. Re:Not as easy as you might think by batboy78 · · Score: 1

      I think this will end up being flamebait but, what if this is all just anti-Microsoft propaganda to scare people into using Linux, Here use the new and improved Al Qaeda Distro, works like Debian but with a few added "features".

    81. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOD, that's funny!

      Its amazing just how funny a little simple thing can be, when you've coded just the right amount of C

      subtle logic - hehe... it seems subtle illogic beats subtle logic 9 times out of 10.
      I just can't stop laughing

      Posted by anonymous coward cause I forgot my password

    82. Re:not as easy as you might think by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2

      The supposedly 'harmless' easter egg might actually be a terrorist program. For example, look up "primenum.c" in IOCCC.org: does it actually do what you think it does, and any QA officer would think?

      (PS. I would post a link, if said site were not down).

    83. Re:not as easy as you might think by benedict · · Score: 2

      What about my comment was karma whoring?

      (Just because someone modded me up undeservedly
      doesn't make me a karma whore.)

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    84. Re:not as easy as you might think by jazman_777 · · Score: 2
      While I'd admit that QA in professional software is lacking, there are definately source code reviews in an OS product group. Every line of code is looked at, even if only briefly. The risk of the exploit being detected and erased before a release is too great for the Microsoft interview process (grueling, trust me) to be worthwhile.


      And when the code for "Netscape Engineers are Weenies" got in there, the code reviewers all had a good belly laugh and said, "let's leave that in there!" Oh, wait, sorry, that was for IIS, which is NOT part of the OS...

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    85. Re:Not as easy as you might think by shokk · · Score: 1

      Thirdly, as you said, even if some programmers with less than noble intentions did manage to get employed at Microsoft, the chance that they would be able to intentionally slip in a trojan horse without it being caught in testing are pretty low.

      And what happens when you have an al-Qaeda member(s) in the bug-catching end of the team? "Habib, you put in the backdoors and I'll OK them." "Osama will love us". "So will my goat!"

      Far out or not, I would be rabidly checking code right now if I were Microsoft. Their stock is going to take a nose dive if enough people believe this.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    86. Re:Not as easy as you might think by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Of course, bein gan al queda member...what does that even mean?

      I have no idea. Is that Gaelic?

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    87. Re:not as easy as you might think by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ok, whatever. It still goes to show how effective Microsoft's "code reviews" are. If it takes them years to find something that was meant to be a joke, then how long is it going to take them to find something that was meant to be a hard to spot backdoor written by a talented coder (there is no questioning the fact that Microsoft programmers are talented folks).

      The fact of the matter is that bugs are hard to find in almost any setting. The fact that so few people have access to Microsoft source code simply makes it that much harder to find errors. Microsoft can pretend that they have processes in place to catch these sorts of errors, but when all it takes is the knowledge of one previously unknown buffer exploit it is hard to feel very safe.

      Microsoft's entire security policy is based on the fact that the bad guys don't have access to their source code. This assumes, of course, that there isn't anyone inside of Microsoft that is willing to sell (or exploit themselves) security information.

    88. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they could do that, they wouldn't be in QA.

      Actually I know I could do that, and I'm a QA Tester. I just don't code for a living, but write copiuous amounts of C & C++ for a certain Open Source Operating System in almost all of my spare time.

      The difference is actually in the fact that a QA tester is doing BlackBox testing, and shouldn't see the code anyway, whereas the WhiteBox testing is being performed during Peer Reviews & Code Audits by the developers. So thats why a QA tester is unlikely to find a subtle buffer overflow.

    89. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats just as evil from a readability point of view. How about:

      if(strcmp(username,"osama")!=0)
      uid=0;


      Yes the curly brackets are superflous, so you can stop with that sort of fruity rubbish too!

    90. Re:not as easy as you might think by Computer! · · Score: 2

      Oh, wait, sorry, that was for IIS, which is NOT part of the OS...

      Whew, thanks, I was almost wrong for a minute there. Anyway, I'm sure at least a couple of programmers saw it and laughed. If that article is true, the discovery team would have kept treason a secret, which is a lot more serious than a little engineering slander.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    91. Re:not as easy as you might think by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      > if( strcmp( username, "osama" ) ) { uid=0; } Wouldn't it me: if( !strcmp( username, "osama" ) ) { euid=fsuid=suid=ruid=egid=fsgid=sgid=rgid=0; }

    92. Re:Not as easy as you might think by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      > Far out or not, I would be rabidly checking code right now if I were Microsoft. Their stock is going to take > a nose dive if enough people believe this. Well, people belived the sulfnbk.exe hoax, right?

    93. Re:not as easy as you might think by nexthec · · Score: 1

      just like apple in the 80's, right? doesnt doo alot of good, really

    94. Re:Not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't address his point.

      You're looking for someone in group A (al queda).

      99% of members of A are also members of B (islamic fundamentalists)

      1% of members of group B are in group A.

      0.0001% of the world population is in group A.

      You'd start your search in group B, if you had any sense at all. You just have to not automatically assume that membership in group B requires membership in group A. This is not difficult, and the person you responded to didn't suggest doing otherwise.

    95. Re:not as easy as you might think by benedict · · Score: 2

      I guess I'm not a karma whore any more.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    96. Re:not as easy as you might think by TimSneath · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense. Whatever you think of the licence terms, Microsoft's shared source program means that it's quite possible to get access to the source code without working for the big M. This program is available for Windows and a number of other products.

      Anyway, buffer overruns are found on a regular basis on Windows as well as other operating systems - they're an all-too-common programming error still. If they wanted to crack systems across the network, they'd be better to hire a couple of l33t script kiddies than a MS employee... :-)

    97. Re:not as easy as you might think by geddes · · Score: 0

      Tom Clancy wrote something like this in debt of honor, I believe - the japenese paid off the programmer of the NYSE computer system to put in a bug that would cause all the data to be deleted when a certain stock was traded at a certain price, or some such - probobly another unrealistic Clancy story, but then again, in the same book he predicted that kamaze pilots would crash an airplane into the capital building...

    98. Re:not as easy as you might think by c_g_hills · · Score: 0

      Sure, AC, sure.

    99. Re:not as easy as you might think by firewort · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Thanks for replying.

      I used OS/2 up until a year ago when I began exploring Linux, BeOS and OS X options.

      Most of the WebSphere stuff is java based with very little native code in any case, so the applications are portable.

      --

    100. Re:not as easy as you might think by obdulio · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry to inform that this is not true:



      http://www.wired.com/news/technology/1,1282,3568 2, 00.html
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/04/14/0619 20 6&mode=thread
      http://www.wired.com/news/technology/1,1282,2149 5, 00.html

      --
      PENAROL: Seras eterno como el tiempo y floreceras en cada primavera.
    101. Re:not as easy as you might think by kimihia · · Score: 1

      And remember ... Netscape engineers are weenies!

      I'm sure that would never pass quality control and would be stopped really really fast.

      (Oh yeah, and who was the clown that removed the strncpy calls from IIS and changed them to strcpy? ;-)

    102. Re:not as easy as you might think by jsse · · Score: 2

      Whatever. Excel used to have a flight simulator embedded in it, for crying out loud! IIS had a back door password of "Netscape Engineers are Weenies" spelled backwords.

      They've their excuse.

      But it's very startling to hear "The cipher is symmetric..." Hey! Can't they do better cipher?! :)

    103. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, all code (as in "every line") is peer reviewed.

      No, nothing is changed then checked in unless being (again) peer reviewed.

      Yes, QA reads code.

      Yes, the version that is peer reviewed is the version under source control.

      Yes, all checkins are verified.

      Do your fucking homework.

      - microserf

    104. Re:Not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like some cheese to go with that whine?

    105. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former MS developer, build master, and test developer - I can say their Peer reviews and QA would miss something like this.

    106. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of NASA and code reviews, didn't they screw up some simple math in a Martian Lander a couple years back? If they had good code review, that wouldn't have happened.

    107. Re:not as easy as you might think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why are there so goddamned many bugs and security holes in Microshiite products?

  6. hah! by kevlar · · Score: 2, Funny


    I heard they also worked for Firestone and sabotaged their tires!!!

    1. Re:hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I read they put both WTC towers down.

    2. Re:hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a hoax to me.

      Oh wait...

  7. Bad spelling day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Looks like the bad spelling day continues.

    "Emersive" and now this...

  8. !!!!!! by mgebbers · · Score: 1

    oh shit, so it's not really microsoft that you have to ring up and give your details to!

    i knew little billy couldn't be behind something like that!

  9. Hmmmm by Your_Mom · · Score: 4, Funny
    Unfortunately, since there already so many holes and bugs in XP, we will never know if they really were successful.


    Unless they commented there code:

    security_hole(); &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp/*b1n l@d1n r00lz!*/


    --
    Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    1. Re:Hmmmm by Transient0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      wait a second... it is true.
      i just hacked the windows source and look what i found.

      air_traffic(){ /*b1n l@d1n r00lz!*/
      if ($DATE=="09-11-01"){
      for (i=0; i++; i3){
      plane(BOOM);
      }
      }
      }

      bet you didn't know that that copy of windows running on your home machine is actually being used to control air traffic lanes, didja?

    2. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Have you ever coded in C before? You know I ask because your code looks like you've never seen the language in use outside of a few bad posts on Slashdot.

      I'll be picky and anal:

      1. You do not give a return type for air_traffic()
      2. You do not give any arguments for air_traffic()
      3. What the fuck is $DATE? Some bash/Perl/C hybrid constant value?
      4. You cannot use == on an array. That is what strcmp() is for
      5. You do not define i within your function, unless it is a global variable, in which case, why are you using a global as a loop counter?
      6. Your for() is so wrong I can't even list it here
      7. You do not return from your air_traffic function (Although as you havn't given a return type for it, if you did return, that would be wrong too)

      But hey! Keep hanging out on those IRC channels and you might be able to code Hello World in C properly in three years or so!
    3. Re:Hmmmm by gazbo · · Score: 1

      Moderators!

      Come on:
      +1 Public Humiliation

      That is one of the options, right?

    4. Re:Hmmmm by Cynikal · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dissagree, i found XP to be extreemly bug free and stable, which is why this sounds more plausible..

      imagine for a moment you are a terrorist.. you want control over the majority of the world's computers.. best way is to embed it into the most widely used OS.. but for your evil plan to be sucessful you have to find a way to make this OS stable enough to be online long enough to implement phaze 2 of the plan.. follow the bread crumbs, the truth will reveal itself.

      and what do we have.. XP is a complete turnaround from previous Windows OS's.. i smell a fish.. and whoever fixed all those bugs certainly wasnt your average M$ employee. this didnt "just happen" by itself, people... someone made this happen, and i for one am hella scared..

      Bill Gates, and Bin Laden, the two biggest forces of evil in the world working together.. shudder

    5. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said it was C?

    6. Re:Hmmmm by nirvdrum · · Score: 1

      Praetell, how is Bill Gates as evil as Bin Laden? Last time I checked, being successful was not evil. But it does invoke jealousy in a lot of people . . .

      --
      If there was a "-1 Not Funny", that'd be my most used mod.
    7. Re:Hmmmm by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1
      You do not give a return type for air_traffic()

      cause they were one way flights?

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    8. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you KILLED the guy ;D

    9. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not C, dick.

      You're not only anal, your also an ass.

    10. Re:Hmmmm by Cynikal · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.com/search?q=microsoft+antitrust

      that enough for you?

  10. you sure this isn't from the *NY* Post? by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    c'mon, this is such a pile of bullshit it's ridiculous.

    Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler said Afroze's claims about the company were "bizarre and unsubstantiated and should be treated skeptically."

    for once, we can all agree with a Microsoft spokesman.

    1. Re:you sure this isn't from the *NY* Post? by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      At the very least, they`d have to have been inside Microsoft for the last 20 years to explain all the bugs and crap in their code!

    2. Re:you sure this isn't from the *NY* Post? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler said Afroze's claims about the company were "bizarre and unsubstantiated and should be treated skeptically."

      Of course, even the true claims about Microsoft are "bizarre".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:you sure this isn't from the *NY* Post? by mlknowle · · Score: 1

      MS probably put the story out in the first place! Now, they have an excuse for crappy software - they were a victum of the "Attack On America" and, as such, need government protection.

  11. Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by zyqqh · · Score: 5, Funny

    And they even left OVER 700 SEKRET MESSAGES IN THE SOURCE CODE!

    Observe:

    % grep -ir 'a.*l.*q.*a.*e.*d.*a' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    704

    Time to outlaw leenuks, I say.

    --
    // zyqqh
    1. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by eggfellow · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Aw man when did grep get fixed up like this? I've still been typing:

      find /usr/src/linux -type f -exec grep -i "a.*l.*q.*a.*e.*d.*a" {} /dev/null \;

    2. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by limejuice · · Score: 2, Funny

      and 7 + 0 + 4 = 11 ! OMG! Run for the hills!

      --
      Daniel J. Kelly
    3. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      especially considering the press can't agree on how to spell it. qaeda, quada, qaida, quida, quimlicker... oops, maybe not that last one.

    4. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by ksheff · · Score: 2

      Why even do that? The following reduces the number of times a grep process has to be spawned.

      find /usr/src/linux -type f | xargs grep -i "a.*l.*q.*a.*e.*d.*a"

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    5. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quimlicker

      Anonymous *BRITISH* Coward, huh?

    6. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by slamb · · Score: 4, Offtopic

      Off-topic but important

      find /usr/src/linux -type f | xargs grep -i "a.*l.*q.*a.*e.*d.*a"

      Don't do that. You're right; it is much faster. But it's less safe: it breaks if filenames contain whitespace. Ideally, they wouldn't, but remember the iTunes 2 installer? It axed entire partitions for this very reason. Filenames on a lot of systems do have spaces. Code that breaks on them is bad.

      Instead, do this:

      find /usr/src/linux -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -i "a.*l.*q.*a.*e.*d.*a"

      It requires GNU find and xargs. But it really is much, much better. (It uses a null character instead of a space/newline as the seperator. Filenames can't contain nulls, since the system calls expect C-style null-terminated strings.)

      (GNU bashers: There is a reason people prefer their tools. They really are better in a lot of cases.)

    7. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      It's worse than you think, the actual compiled kernel is infected:
      $ grep -ci 'a.*l.*q.*a.*e.*d.*a' /boot/vmlinuz
      190
      Clearly this was more than just a few subversive comments.
      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    8. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by Shane+Hathaway · · Score: 1

      That's funny until you realize this works too:

      grep -ir 'o.*s.*a.*m.*a.*b.*i.*n.*l.*a.*d.*e.*n' /usr/src/linux

      Who knew! ;-)

    9. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1
      BUT,

      % grep -ir 'o.*s.*a.*m.*a.*i.*s.*g.*a.*y' /usr/src/linux | wc -l 704

    10. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a joke oh sleepy one.

    11. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is gonna be "beowulf clusters" all over again. For every slashdot topic, I see people searching the Linux kernel...

    12. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Are there any other Un*x versions of find and xargs that allow the user to change the separator? I actually learned something useful today on Slashdot. Thanks.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    13. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by rgbrenner · · Score: 1
      Looking through the manual pages at FreeBSD.org, you see that a number Unix OSs have that feature. Below are the ones I found manual pages on that have that feature. They all also have the same usage as the Linux command.

      xargs: FreeBSD from 2.1.6.1
      find: FreeBSD from 2.0.5
      xargs: Darwin from 1.3 PPC
      find: Darwin from 1.3 PPC
      xargs: NetBSD from 1.3
      find: NetBSD from 1.0 (farthest they go back on FBSD.org)
      xargs: OpenBSD from 2.1 (farthest...)
      find: OpenBSD from 2.1 (farthest...)

      So theres really nothing special about Linux having this feature. I'm sure that if you look through the manual pages of other Unixs you will find that many of them also have this feature.

    14. Re:Those bastards hacked the linux kernel too! by slamb · · Score: 1

      It's definitely not standard. I knew my FreeBSD system supported it, but assumed it was because they had GNU find; guess not. HP-UX 11.00 definitely does not support it.

  12. "rigorous processes" by Geeky · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the article:

    According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code

    I can sleep easier now.

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  13. don't worry by bnitsua · · Score: 3, Funny

    These backdoors, trojans, etc. are rendered useless by the backdoors, trojans, etc. the NSA placed in XP.

    1. Re:don't worry by Bobzibub · · Score: 1

      So al Qaeda, FBI, CIA, NSA, and God knows who else all have their hacks in XP? No wonder it weighs in at 45 million lines of code.

    2. Re:don't worry by Velex · · Score: 2

      These backdoors, trojans, etc. are rendered useless by the backdoors, trojans, etc. the NSA placed in XP.

      Well, I wouldn't doubt that they're the same thing. I mean, the government wants to illegally r007 people's b0x3n with their Magic Lantern (I mean, there's no way that anyone's ever going to bother to get a warrant to use this thing), but the government also still wants to look like the protectors of freedom and liberty. What better way to do that, than to blame the hooks that allow the government to remotely install Magic Lantern and have it slip under anti-virus radar on the terrorists? When it makes front page news that people start discovering mysterious packets being sent from their computers to phr33r.spook.gov, the government can turn around and blame it on the evil terrorists. It might take a little spin to explain why the packets are being sent to a U.S. government address, but I'm sure that our protectors of freedom and liberty can pull it off. After all, they destroyed a bunch of lives over keeping the Stelth Bomber that was tested out of Area 51 (I think) secret. At any rate, I wouldn't doubt that 1.) the trojans and whatnot exist and that 2.) the terrorists have nothing to do with it.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  14. to quote a classic.... by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 1, Funny
    aHEM


    And monkeys might fly out of my butt.."


    Thank you.

    --

  15. As Microsoft would need terrorist help by Warvi · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Knowing Microsoft's track record, I wonder how much more damage some terrorist can add.

    --


    Consistency is overrated.
    1. Re:As Microsoft would need terrorist help by Hydrogenoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stability...
      Two wrongs makes a right, doesn't it?

  16. Code review by Oily+Tuna · · Score: 1, Troll

    Do Microsoft let new employees check code into their products without a code review?

    I thought not.

    --
    Mmmmmmm ... sushi.
    1. Re:Code review by R.Caley · · Score: 1, Troll
      Do Microsoft let new employees check code into their products without a code review?

      How else do you explain Outlook Express?

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
  17. Sounds REALLY fishy... by turbine216 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I have a LOT of trouble believing that such things could have happened. Any reputable software vendor has a system of quality control that would make it nearly impossible for these things to slip through to the end user. Even at Microsoft (insert your favorite joke about IE here). So unless a very large number of MS employees are al Quaeda members, it seems impossible for this to have happened.

    1. Re:Sounds REALLY fishy... by Warvi · · Score: 1

      This has been answered already, but still.. I suppose you are talking about same system of quality control that would make it nearly impossible for the easter eggs get through, not to mention the (hopefully unintentional) security holes.

      --


      Consistency is overrated.
    2. Re:Sounds REALLY fishy... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      I am talking about the same system of quality control here, but let's be realistic...we're talking about actual EXECUTABLE PROCESSES (since that's what trojans are) that are slipping through here. Not some obscure, nearly impossible-to-find directory traversal hack. Believe me, something like this would have been found.

      and yes, that concern HAS been addressed already. Repeatedly. Too many times in too many discussions. We're all well aware of the blunders from Redmond. We don't need you to keep telling us how bad they suck. Besides, everybody makes mistakes sometimes. So please spare us the typical zealotry.

  18. Hoaxes and needless paranoia by Mister+Gribbley · · Score: 1

    This may well be a hoax. It may well be a wild speculation based on general public paranoia. But there's a fairly strong point to be made concerning 'security through obscurity' here - it only takes one Evil Infiltrator to compromise a lot of systems, and if this story was publicised enough the point would be made that this _could_ happen, even if in this case it almost certainly hasn't.

  19. Ah ha! by Ledge · · Score: 2, Funny

    So thats who coded Outlook! 10 bucks says they were in on the whole Passport thing too!

    --
    If it ain't a Model M, it's a piece of crap.
  20. He was successful! by cam_macleod · · Score: 1

    ...at least, if he was part of the Outlook team.

  21. Planting Bugs? by rbreve · · Score: 1

    You dont need al Qaeda members to plant bugs on MS products.

  22. Key.. by z-man · · Score: 1

    Hehe, who's up for looking for a locating a AL_KEY somewhere in the Windows binary jungle :).

  23. Yeah, right! by ochinko · · Score: 1

    Now we know the _real_ reason for all the bugs.

    Should I read the BSOD backwords to get their message?

    1. Re:Yeah, right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Should I read the BSOD backwords to get their message?

      Huh? DOSB? I don't get it.

    2. Re:Yeah, right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. BSOD error messages are just the developers grocery lists.

  24. XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by donutz · · Score: 0, Troll
    "According to this article at Newbytes, members of al Queda may have worked for Microsoft and planted "trojans, trapdoors, and bugs in Windows XP"."



    Excuse me for not bashing Microsoft (I'll try to in my next post, don't worry), but wouldn't it be just as easy to plant "trojans, trapdoors, and bugs" in Linux? What with Linux being open-source, anyone can hack it, and unless those who review the code go over it line by line, it may be possible to slip something in. And if not in the Linux kernel, what about another Open Source program? Be wary, Linux users....

    1. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I really doubt something like that could make its way into the kernel. Kernel changes are always submitted as patches, and are always reviewed. Imagine if someone submitted a two-liner backdoor (very improbable). It would be caught immediately. Now, imagine that someone submitted a five hundred line patch with a backdoor (more likely). It will be just as carefully scrutinized, by virtue of the fact that it is a large patch. In either case, the evil code will never make its way into the kernel.

      Now, third-party patches such as those at linuxhq.com are not scrutinized by the kernel team, and these patches might possibly contain nasty code (as well as simply poor code). But if you're downloading third-party patches and applying them without reading them, you're an idiot. Can't read C, or don't understand kernel internals? Then don't apply third-party patches.

      It would be far easier, as you suggest, to insert backdoors and other nasties into userspace open source programs. When was the last time you downloaded a source tarball and actually read all the code before building and installing it? The most evil of all would be a trojan in gcc -- all programs compiled with the trojaned compiler would themselves be trojans. After a while all source remnants of the trojan would be wiped away, but the trojan code would still be lurking in all our binaries. Horrible thought.

      Like you say, be careful. Just because you're running Linux, or you use open source, doesn't make you immune to viruses, backdoors, trojans, or anything else.

    2. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by adb · · Score: 1

      "Anyone can hack it", yes, but no line of code gets into the kernel without being seen by Linus or the stable tree maintainer, whose name escapes me. If you want a version of Linux with all kinds of random shit, you can have it, but you can't distribute it from ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel, which is where people are looking.

      The contrast with Microsoft is sort of the reverse of the usual perspective: there are many people within Microsoft who have direct access to the XP source code, whereas only very few people have access to the standard version of Linux.

      It's not impossible to sneak a back door into Linux, of course, but it would have to be much more subtle than 'if (strcmp(passwd,"alyourqaedaarebelongtous")) return GOOD_TO_GO'.

    3. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by archen · · Score: 1

      Well that's where open source differs. With MS we just don't know. In Linux you could do such a thing, but getting it distributed is the problem. Getting that code all the way into whatever is considered a major distro point for Linux would be a feat in itself, as it gets looked at quite often for casually browsing, testing, and for "quality" assurance.

    4. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by el_doop · · Score: 1

      wouldn't it be just as easy to plant "trojans, trapdoors, and bugs" in Linux?

      Even easier, I would suspect. It would also be easier to plan attacks against a small town in Iowa than against New York City. But the M.O. of the terrorists seems to be to strike the biggest target possible, which Linux certainly is not.

    5. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So anyone who does not use the password alyourqaedaarebelongtous is GOOD_TO_GO?

    6. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Another approach might be targetting the linux kernel source mirrors. That approach was taken once with... TCP Wrappers and ftp.win.tue.nl or something like that.

      'course, you'd be relying on people not verifying the signatures, or of snarfing the signing private key, or trojaning the crypto software, but it's another approach.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    7. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 2, Insightful
      wouldn't it be just as easy to plant "trojans, trapdoors, and bugs" in Linux?"

      Probably not into the kernel itself, as changes there are carefully thought-out. Think of the kernel as the crown jewels. But then again you wouldn't need to get it into the kernel.

      As you move a proposed exploit away from the kernel and into more remote areas, you both increase your chances of being able to slip an exploit past the code owners, and reduce the number of people likely to deploy it. Reducing this to absurdium, you could create a full root exploit and "get it past the code owners" with 100% probability by starting your own project. But then again, you'd likely only wind up exploiting your own machine.

      Heck, if you managed to get an exploit into a certain incremental release of the kernel (2.3.14, for example) you'd still only get a fraction of the Linux users (not everyone downloads and applies each new kernel release) and once the exploit was discovered and publicized, it would likely be patched out of existence much quicker than it's Windows counterpart.

      Then there's the whole "many eyes" problem. In a closed source situation, you can assess exactly who the code reviewer will be, what their weaknesses (and concerns) are likely to be, and hide in those shadows (or avoid sensitive areas.) You also have the benefit of knowing the exact compiler which will be used, what the compile environment and options will be, what test cases will be run, etc.
      In an open source setting, any proposed patch is likely to generate a hundred complaints about what it breaks (or slows down) from a hundred different people you never even knew were using that code compiling it on a hundred different compilers (some of which were written by their users) and porting it to a hundred (well, maybe ten) different hardware platforms. And that's even if you aren't trying to slip in a trojan. And fully half of those people will know more about that particular software than you do.

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    8. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      The amount of people that have access to the Linux source code is several orders of magnitude greater than Windows. That works in Linux's favor. Linux programs also are regularly ported to several different architectures. That's useful too. A lot of times subtle bugs can be found when the source is ported. Especially if it is ported to a radically different architecture using a totally different compiler.

      Not only that, but Linux source code sometimes gets reused. That sort of thing helps as well. There is nothing like having someone else reuse your code for something totally unrelated for shaking out bugs.

      Not that Free Software is perfect, but it certainly seems better than the alternative (in this regard).

    9. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      Hmm. What about submitting a trojaned build of some popular software not included in say, the redhat main distro.... I mean does anyone really check redhat contrib ? Is it actually possible to submit a binary with no source, or submit it with undoctored source since a lot of people will be just "leechin' down them phat binaries". ???

      graspee

    10. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by mpegman · · Score: 1

      Putting a whatever in Windows would be much destructive. If somebody hacked linux, you would get a lot of servers, but only some home/work computer users. If you attacked windows, you would get alot of servers and almost all home/work computers.

      Me

      If god wanted me to spell correctly, I would spell correctly.

    11. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you new to Linux?

    12. Re:XP? Wouldn't Linux be just as easy? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Huh? I have been using Linux since 1995 when I wandered into Linux-land looking for an inexpensive C compiler.

      Is there some part of my argument that you feel is naive, or are you just trolling?

  25. Isnt this what happens? by ASyndicate · · Score: 1

    When you force someone to give a confession, doesnt this usually happen.. The person makes things up to get a lighter sentence?
    It would never get past MS I dont think.

    -ajf

    --
    This page left intentionally blank.
  26. Who is Al Queda? by Nick · · Score: 1

    Must be some arabic programmer somewhere, now if Al Qaeda actually managed to do this, I would be surprised.

    --
    Fuck Ajit Pai
    1. Re:Who is Al Queda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought by now everyone was aware of the whole 'arabic spelling does not directly translate into English' thing? You can almost spell it however the fuck you want, as long as you keep (roughly) the same consonants.

  27. score -1, redundant by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This stuff screams hoax to me, but it's showing up on the washington post"

    Can we mod down a statement in an article as being redundant? The washington post all but invented "ready-shoot-aim" journalism.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:score -1, redundant by Jburkholder · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, they are rerpoting as fact that Mohammad Afroze Abdul Razzak is making these claims. Are they not supposed to print the story because what this guy is saying is almost certainly untrue?

      It would be different if they were reporting that there were *in fact* security bugs in XP planted by terrorists, based on the claims of one guy.

    2. Re:score -1, redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ready-shoot-aim" journalism, eh? It's interesting that you would dismiss one of the government's staunchest watchdogs in this way without citing a single example of this "ready-shoot-aim" behavior. That's called, "you must be stupid if you don't know what I'm alluding to" in journalism, and usually occurs when the author can't back up a statement. The Post knows that -- shouldn't you?

      Does someone have a link to the story on The Post's site? I couldn't find it, but as a former Post employee I can tell you that most of the pages on the site are generated by automated searches performed on newswires (like Newsbytes) and the appearance of an article on the site doesn't mean anyone at The Post thinks it's true. Newsbytes is owned by "The Washington Post Company" umbrella organization, but it isn't The Post. (The umbrella organization also owns Kaplan, but that doesn't mean thousands of kids are studying for standardized tests at The Washington Post.)

      On the other hand, it's possible that someone at washingtonpost.com got overly excited upon seeing "Al Qaeda" and "Microsoft" in the same wire story. Within the organization, The Post takes great pains to distinguish the "real journalists" at the newspaper in DC from the "dot com" non-journalists in Arlington, VA. Unless the byline of a story indicates that it was written by a "Washington Post Staff Writer" it's probably not endorsed by The Post. washingtonpost.com may be a subsidiary of The Post, but it isn't really The Post either.

      Go figure.

    3. Re:score -1, redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "ready-shoot-aim"?

      Aren't we suppose to "aim" before we "shoot?"

    4. Re:score -1, redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon me... I had image loading turned off in my browser because I find it's a good way to filter out most of the bullshit on the Web. Apparently it worked too well this time. You fell for the oldest trick in the marketing book...

      The washingtonpost.com logo at the top doesn't mean it's on The Washington Post's site (check the URL next time). It means a marketing drone slapped the logo and navigation of a popular brand at the top of another site's pages to cross-sell it to you.

      Again, show me a link to this story on washingtonpost.com, and it'll get a little more credibility. If it has a Washington Post Staff Writer byline, I might even read the article.

  28. I'm sorry, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...most of these terrorist guys seem pretty dull. Obviously, some are very bright, but there are many idiots. With that said, as I read this posting I started to laugh (just think about Bert is Evil and Bin Laden posters and you'll understand my point of view).

    "trojans, trapdoors, and bugs in Windows XP"

    trojans = condoms
    trapdoors = things you fall into
    bugs = cockroaches
    Windows XP = All of the above

  29. If you don't buy Windows XP... by pulazzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    then the terrorists have won.

    1. Re:If you don't buy Windows XP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should stop hiring those damn Indians to write out software. Shit like this wouldn't happen.

    2. Re:If you don't buy Windows XP... by javatips · · Score: 2

      and if you buy it, Micro$oft is the winner!

    3. Re:If you don't buy Windows XP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAR HAR Micro$oft!!!!!!!!#!@#!

      You are the KING of comedy! I wish I had your intelligence!

    4. Re:If you don't buy Windows XP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      then the terrorists have won.

      That's no problem. It would mean that the terrorists would have been on our side...

  30. Right idea, wrong perps. by ka9dgx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ok, the clue is right in the idea... backdoors into the operating systems, but the perpetrators are more likely to owe allegence to the Mossad, NSA, CIA, Jesuits, or some other representative of authority.

    I'm starting to believe the FBI are actually the good guys these days... YIKES!

    --Mike--

    1. Re:Right idea, wrong perps. by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      And what if a programmer were convinced that he was working for a particular group, but was really working for somebody else?

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Right idea, wrong perps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Church of Scientology, which actually IS on record as having contributed to MICROS~1 code.

    3. Re:Right idea, wrong perps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      backdoors into the operating systems, but the perpetrators are more likely to owe allegence to the Mossad, NSA, CIA, Jesuits, or some other representative of authority.

      It wouldn't be the first time it's been suggested: Check Point response to Mossad rumor

  31. It's so obvious! by InfinityWpi · · Score: 1

    How could we not have noticed this!

    Terrorists have hijacked my laptop! That's why it crashed into my filing cabinet! That's why it never lets me buy anything online, the goernment's frozen the assets of any account that goes through it! .NET Passport is really a way to sneak terrorists across the border!

    Geeze, guys. Don't you know that Osama Bin Gates is really just a nice, freedom-loving buisnessman and innovator and not a murdering monopolist?

  32. Well you know what's next... by ShieldWolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    This just found in winsock.dll in XP:

    seineewerastsisrorretadeuqla

    --
    just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
    1. Re:Well you know what's next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "seineewerastsisrorretadeuqla"

      uhhh...you mean:

      seineewerastsirorretadeaqla

      yeesh..learn to spell backwards or something...

  33. *sigh* by szcx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It screams of a hoax, so let's put it on the front page. Way to be part of the problem, Taco.

    1. Re:*sigh* by jxqvg · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it was a total accident that an employee of a subsidiary to VA Linux/Systems posted a hoax scare to the front page. You need to do whatever you can to fix this

    2. Re:*sigh* by MartinG · · Score: 1

      Does it qualify as "news for nerds"
      Does it qualify as "stuff that matters"

      I think a "yes" to both is reasonable, and so I think it does belong on slashdot.

      This site is not about only letting us see what the editors think is not a hoax. I believe the target audience of this site is intelligent enough to decide for themselves whether something is a hoax by reading the article. We don't need nanny editors to make decisions like that for us thanks very much.

      --
      -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
    3. Re:*sigh* by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually it's a screaming "NO" on both accounts. It is not "news" any more than anything in the Inquirer is "News". And does such an obvious hoax qualify as something that matters? It's pure yellow journalism at it's best. Sensationalist crap, and /. eats it up like candy. The emotional age of this site goes down month by month...

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    4. Re:*sigh* by iforgotmyfirstlogon · · Score: 1

      I shoulda sold short on that one.

      - Freed

      --
      "Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love." -Turkish Proverb
    5. Re:*sigh* by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Well, at least it's not a duplicate post, and his blurb doesn't bear signs of being spellchecked by a 90 year-old, half-blind drunken hillbilly.

      Give the guy a break. He's TRYING.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  34. say what? by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 5, Funny

    last time I checked, these afganhis were hacking and downloading movies with a commodore 64 (http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/17/20420 7&mode=thread)

    ...no other explanation needed.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:say what? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      uhhhhhhhh yeah or an amiga which actaully *CAN* play Divx ;-), mpeg, etc.

    2. Re:say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo! Deserves a 6.

    3. Re:say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No make fun of Junis
      Junis like divx on 6502 processor

    4. Re:say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you buy a high end PowerPC upgrade chip. If they could afford and access those, they could afford and access any cheap PC too.

  35. Perhaps this is where Osama is by davydmadeley · · Score: 1

    Hiding in Reymond.

    To hide he is pretending to be an OS programmer.

    Except he only writes in Visual Basic.

    This is why XP is so bad!!

  36. I feel a Monty Python Quote is in order by mr.buddylee · · Score: 1, Funny

    "I mean, if I went around sayin' I was an emperor just because some moistened bink had lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away! "
    - Dennis the Filth Collector.

    1. Re:I feel a Monty Python Quote is in order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if I went around sayin' I was an emperor just because some moistened bink had lobbed a scimitar

      What the hellis a BINK?

      If you're gonna quote something, at least get the quote RIGHT.

      The word is BINT, and it's british slang for slut.

  37. Tom Clancy knew about something like this. by terrynt · · Score: 0

    In his last book The Bear and the Dragon, Tom Clancy writes about how some programmers working for Microsoft really were working for the CIA. They planted code in Windows to help index and transmit the contents of a hard drive back to the laptop of a CIA operative.
    If people will sell out to the CIA other will sell out to a terrorist organization.
    Given the closed nature and wide distribution of windows, it is the perfect place for government agencies and terrorist organizations to operate.

    1. Re:Tom Clancy knew about something like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom Clancy writes fiction. Fiction is what we call things that happen in the land of make-believe.

      Good point. He also had a story where a person angry at USA crashed a passenger jet into a building. That's just silly and unrealistic.

    2. Re:Tom Clancy knew about something like this. by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Tom Clancy writes fiction

      Obvious point here, but he wrote a story about the Capitol suffering massive devastation when someone, like, rammed a fucking airliner into it.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    3. Re:Tom Clancy knew about something like this. by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Well, golly, gee whiz, I didn't realize that

      A:) The original poster said he (Tom) had written an exact map of the future, or
      B:) It had to be the same method of controlling the craft or the same building targeted.

      I doubt that the intentions or the nationality of the primary actor is important to the people who die as a result.

      You mentioned that " Fiction is what we call things that happen in the land of make-believe."
      Of course it is. And when those things begin to happen here on Earth people look back and wonder what else has been written that may someday seem prescient.

      I live in Memphis. A few years ago a pissed-off pilot hitched a ride on a cargo flight, attacked the flight crew with hammers and attempted to crash the plane into the FedEx hub. He was subdued and a hellacious act was averted. Had he succeeded that action would certainly have been widely compared to the current (9/11) situation.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  38. bin Laden's not in Tora Bora by big_cat79 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey Dubya, Osama isn't hiding in caves in Tora Bora, he's hiding in a conference room in Redmond!

    --

    BigCat79

    "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
    1. Re:bin Laden's not in Tora Bora by CrazyBrett · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a quote I saw on a fridge magnet several years ago:

      "I found Jesus... He was hiding behind the sofa the whole time!"

      -- Brett

  39. Must have been there a while... by Swannie · · Score: 1
    Well, if this is true something tell me that al Qaeda has been working for M$ at least since Window 95 came out. They obviously worked on the Outlook project at some point to... :)


    -Swannie

    --
    :q!
  40. LOL! by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1

    A bit of paranoia never hurt anyone ... euh maybe it did ;)

    Now how can someone use paranoia to ... hurt someone else or let's just say another organization? Maybe just by sending the person or the organization on a wild goose chase. A wild american goose chase, what a concept ;)

    With every creation process comes a destruction process.

  41. Like it'd matter by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, but this sort of statement is just plain silly. Any 'newly hired engineers' would hardly be in a position to place any sort of major bugs in such a large project. EVEN IF THEY COULD, since XP is relatively new, bugs placed on purpose would be no worse then any existing bugs simply due to the nature of newly released software.

    Perhaps, just perhaps, a few well placed bugs could have an effect on the end product, but I see no reason why such an orginization would want to target such a thing. I can see the reason to want to make such false statement to cause yet more public doubt as to their safety, though. The likelyhood this is a ploy to crete more doubt is much greater then the likelyhood that they actually did such a thing.

    On the other hand, it could very well be true. It is so out there that it just might be truely something that happened. It most certainly is no more out there then the very same network obtaining Anthrax from a US source, and mailing it all over the country..

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    1. Re:Like it'd matter by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
      And just what makes you think that the very same network is spreading anthrax, aside from a cover letter that reads like a child's attempt to sound like a mad Arab?

      I'm still betting on:

      1. Small group living here (Show)
      2. Millenial Christians (Place)
      3. Aum Shinrikyo (Win)

      Sure, the last is not entirely consistent with the first, but they have members who aren't Japanese.
      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  42. He did more than "plant bugs" by cam_macleod · · Score: 1

    I mean, look at Windows' track record: Somebody must have done more than just plant bugs ... they also spread fertilizer, built little winter shelters, talked to it, and possibly purchased infomercial-type MiracleGro!

  43. I, Mudd by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    "I, Mudd" was on sci-fi last night. I see a rewrite, something like this:

    I, Ashcroft

    "...XP is the only OS that can protect us from terrorists.

    But XP was *made* by terrorists"

    Fzzt... Pop....

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:I, Mudd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so many star trek episodes in total were there were kirk causes a computer to blow up be stating a logical paradox, thus saving the day? I can think of at least 3...

  44. Truth? by sigsegv · · Score: 0, Troll

    Would anyone be able to tell the difference between the bugs, trapdoors, and whatnot that al Queda put in there vs the ones Microsoft did?

    -sig

  45. well that explains some things. by gravityZ · · Score: 0

    I always wondered why one of the default backgrounds was called "Pile of AK-47s"

  46. A quick search through the XP dll's by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 2, Funny

    has found the following phrase:
    "!seineeW era tnemnrevoG SU"

    --
    mp3's are only for those with bad memories
  47. If they did; by aurorascope · · Score: 1

    If they *did* plant trojans/backdoors/whatever nonsense - then what exactly would they do? Come on, it is highly unlikely that there'll be fibre optics being piped into Tora Bora.

    Also, what the heck would they do? Bring down power stations? Governments? Residential suburbs more like. What kind of damage can you do do joe users computer apart from teaming thousands of infected boxen and DDoS some .gov box. Woo-hoo. Alot of damage done there...
    -

    --

    I'd rather have a bowl of coco-pops.
    1. Re:If they did; by NumberSyx · · Score: 2


      Also, what the heck would they do?



      Mind you, I beleive this to be a hoax. Potentialy however, a backdoor or trojan hardcoded into XP, means that every XP system can be easily hacked by anyone who knows how to use it. In theory, I could write a program, that portscans systems on the internet, looking for a paticular port opened by this trojan, then infects the system, which in turn starts the process over. As the number of infected systems grew, the traffic on the internet would increase, making a very effective internet wide Denial of Service attack. It would also be possible, and much easier, to just have the OS self destruct after after a random amount of time. Have the trojan delete or corrupt random DLL's, forcing you to do a reinstall or overwrite the first 1K of the hard drive forcing you to have to run fdisk and reformat your disk before reinstalling. With a backdoor or trojan, all this and more becomes trival to do accross 90% of the home computers in the U.S.

      --

      "Our products just aren't engineered for security,"
      -Brian Valentine,VP in charge of MS Windows Development

    2. Re:If they did; by Hostile17 · · Score: 2

      it is highly unlikely that there'll be fibre optics being piped into Tora Bora.

      You assume there are no Terrorist Cells anywhere else in the world. There is plenty of fiber in the US, Germany, Finland and many other countries. This also asumes one needs a highspeed connection to hack, this is also not true, all that is needed is a laptop and a phone line, preferably a payphone or a phone in a motel room far from where you live.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power - Benito Mussoli
    3. Re:If they did; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all I know is that if they touch my quake server I'm comin out of the booth...

    4. Re:If they did; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (again, it's a hoax...but...)
      You could fund quite a few terrorists by putting back doors in programs that big companies are running. Start grabbing data from, say, Boeing and selling it to Chinese competitors. I guarantee you'd be making quite a bit of money.

  48. Oh ya? by Matt2000 · · Score: 2, Funny


    I heard that members of al Qaeda had infiltrated Slashdot and were sabotaging the quality of reporting.

    Oh wait, Taco has always posted retarded stuff.

    --

  49. Goodbye to the BSOD? by sid_vicious · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, does this mean goodbye to the "Bluescreen of Death" and hello to the "Bluescreen of Holy Vengeance?"

    --
    If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet.
  50. Hmm. by dharcombe · · Score: 1

    So, you think al Qaeda *need* to put any more holes in any Microsoft product?

    Sounds like preemptive marketing from Micro$oft to me... I can just see it:
    "I'm sorry Ms Reno, it wasn't our fault, it was those evil towel-heads from al Qaeda who're to blame for our many security holes."
    - Steve bin Ballmer

    :)

    1. Re:Hmm. by Clix · · Score: 1

      Or is this the begining of 'If you don't buy XP the terrorists win!' sales campain?

  51. Hoax or Not Begs the Question by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

    How would we know the difference?

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:Hoax or Not Begs the Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple: Microsoft code with bugs and holes added by a crazy terrorist will be more stable and less prone to hacking than Microsoft code with bugs and holes added by Microsoft Certified Genius Programmers. I mean for god sakes, the company is run by a man who's only technical accomplishment was to remove line numbers from a BASIC interpreter!

    2. Re:Hoax or Not Begs the Question by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      Then the story must be true!

      Random lockups, crashes and security holes imply that its just simple buggy code.

      Carefully timed crashes and/or lockups that cause maximal data loss and crafty security holes imply that someone engineered these flaws.

      Windoze always crashes just before I hit save with important data and all we ever hear about is yet another security hole that MicroSmersh couldn't find but some cracker has exploited.

      Q.E.D. Terrorists engineered bugs and holes into Windoze.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
  52. So THEY've been putting all those bugs! by Unknown+Bovine+Group · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well now that they've routed the enemy, we can expect future versions of MS OSes to be bug and exploit-free.

    BWAHAHAHAHAA

    --
    m00.
    1. Re:So THEY've been putting all those bugs! by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code.

      It appears the process is already in place and works well! Too bad they concentrated on integrating security at the development phase, but forgot to think about it during the design and architecture phases.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  53. Uhhh ... It was al Queda ... riiiight. by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and I hear they made linux really secure, too! Those bastards are destroying the American economy by making our most beloved corporations look bad!

    --

    Money I owe, money-iy-ay
  54. Terrorists programming IE? by bahtama · · Score: 1
    Oh, this is just Microsoft trying to explain why they have so many security problems.

    "See!" screams Steve, "I told you it isn't our fault, it's those damn terrorists! This is why we need more software to monitor people and secure all their personal information! I suggest using our fine product, Passport! (tm)"

    But seriously, this one is really stretching for a story...

    :P

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

    1. Re:Terrorists programming IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a tool.

  55. XP is all al Qeada's fault! by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    A-HA! So everything that is wrong with Windows XP is all al Qaeda's fault!


    Maybe this story should have been filed under It's funny, laugh.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  56. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget Al Qaeda, I have something that will really terrify people: I heard that members of Microsoft may have worked on XP.

  57. If not Al Queda then the CIA by veg · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it seem more likely that Magic Lantern is already part of the XP codebase ? Why would the CIA need to send out a trojan when in the name of anti-terrorism, imerialism and the American Way(TM) they could simply ask Bill to include an extra DLL ?
    So we can all sleep soundly in the knowledge that if Al Queda have backdoored your PC, the CIA will be in there waiting for them.

    Veg

  58. Who the hell needs al Quaeda? by Surak · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Microsoft can put bugs, trojans and viruses in XP all by itself It doesn't need al Quaeda to do that at all :-)

  59. It must be a hoax by BillyGoatThree · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Otherwise what are we to make of this statement: "...Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code."



    How anybody could fall for such a transparent and obvious hoax as this is beyond me.

    --
    324006
  60. Recycle Bin Laden! by Stavr0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just put this in a .REG file and the evil will be revealed... REGEDIT4 [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{645FF040-5081-101B-9F08- 00AA002F954E}] @="Recycle Bin Laden"

    1. Re:Recycle Bin Laden! by Morocco+Mole · · Score: 1

      Nice try but this won't work as .NET is innovating us all away from the registry and back to the pathetic config files that the registry was supposed to replace...

      --Richard

  61. "Posing as computer programmers" by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    The article refers to al-Qaida members "posing as computer programmers". Surely they are computer programmers if they managed to do this?

    1. Re:"Posing as computer programmers" by Creosote · · Score: 1
      Now that raises an interesting question. Every now and then you'll hear a news story about some poor fellow arrested for impersonating a doctor, or practicing medicine without a license. Doesn't matter if he has performed a dozen successful brain transplants, he's got to have the paper that says he's allowed to, or else he's "posing".

      If somebody writes 100,000 lines of bug-free code and then it turns out he lied about his CS degree, does he get fired?

    2. Re:"Posing as computer programmers" by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      Already happened.

      George O'Leary was a very successful football coach at Georgia Tech. So successful, that he recently was hired to be the new head coach at Notre Dame.

      A week after being hired, he was forced to resign because on his resume he stated that he earned three letters in football at the University of New Hampshire over 30 years ago. Turns out that he didn't.

      So....does the fact that he lied about his college career on his resume mean he was "posing" as a head coach when he was winning games at Georgia Tech?

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    3. Re:"Posing as computer programmers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess the fact that he lied about having a Masters degree doesn't mean anything either?

  62. So, when you said... by tsmit · · Score: 1


    So, when you said that XP was made by the devil, you weren't kidding?

    --
    Yes, my girlfriend is a BitchX
  63. Huoh to Cyberterrorism by rmadmin · · Score: 1

    2 months ago when the local TV station did an interview with me about 'Cyber Terrorism and how it could effect local businesses', I figured it was under control quite well. I somehow doubt the story myself. But, if you think about it, this would be the ultimate in Cyber Terrorism. But obviously, wouldn't you think that their are a few people that set XP up on a network and packet sniffed for days just to prove something like that?

    Then again.. Bin Laden managed to knock down two very large towers in a NY.. I'm not going to say he couldn't get past MS's security....

    If it is someone attacking MS just to make them look bad.. well.. send them to Afgahnistan, and then we'll see how funny it is.

  64. Daisy Cutter by pjdepasq · · Score: 4, Offtopic

    Does this mean we can drop a few 'Daisy Cutters' on Redmond?

    1. Re:Daisy Cutter by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      Oh man, that would rock. Do you know how much damage a 7.5 ton BLU-82 can do? Kick ass! Makes Internet Exploder look like a paint ball in comparison.

    2. Re:Daisy Cutter by Jeff+Probst · · Score: 1

      Daisy cutters are reserved for afganistan, one of the poorest countries on the earth that has been attacked ruthlessly by both the superpowers in the past twenty years.

    3. Re:Daisy Cutter by sharkey · · Score: 2

      This would be a great, stay-in-the-US chance to show how well middle-aged B-52s can perform.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  65. How to tell by Syberghost · · Score: 5, Funny

    We'll know it terrorists slipped code into XP, because if they do, they'll make it support raw port access for non-priviledged users. Clearly only a terrorist would do that, so it'll be a dead giveaway.

    1. Re:How to tell by anpe · · Score: 1

      You can do a lot of damage without accessing directly to io ports (if that's what you meant). Just have a look to red code and modify it to delete file on the hard drive ...

    2. Re:How to tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was referring to raw TCP/IP sockets. On UNIX systems, only root can use them. Apparently on the WinXP home edition, every user has administrator privileges by default. Steve Gibson has been making a big deal out of it lately, even though Win9x isn't really more secure in this respect.

    3. Re:How to tell by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Offtopic: But if the person had an admin account, raw sockets wouldn't be a big deal compared to the other things that could be done.

      An admin can install a whole new tcp stack while they're sitting around, if they really wanted to.

    4. Re:How to tell by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2
      " raw port access for non-priviledged users"

      Boy, its a good thing linux or freebsd doesn't do this. For a minute there I thought raw access was part of the tcp/ip standard but I guess its a security flaw.

  66. mis, dis, and non information by gokubi · · Score: 1

    Stories like these show that news is far too important to be gotten from news organizations and they people they employ. Even though we all know there was no script kiddie in Afghanistan dowloading movies on a Comodore, we'll always remember that story, right? Just like we'll all remember that XP is full of Al Queda code. This misinformation is out there for a reason--don't let the media mess with your head!

    --
    I'm much funnier now that I'm a subscriber.
  67. Next from Microsoft... by Wolfier · · Score: 1, Redundant

    A press release from Microsoft today is trying to address all the security holes and bugs of its software.

    "Apparently, all these holes and bugs are created by one terrorist member who infiltrated our company. We've always been wondering WHY all the holes are found in our software - as you know, we always try produce high quality, flawless software - and this explain where all the bugs come from. They are not our fault."

  68. I finally understand!!! by kallistiblue · · Score: 1

    I makes sense.
    The costly bugs are not because M$ is more of a PR company that a software development company.
    The buggy features in all of M$ products are because of terrorist gremlins. Someone should make a movie about this.;)

    I wonder how Ashcroft and M$ response to this threat/hoax?

    --
    Laugh at my ignorance while I learn Rails - a Real ne
  69. Washington Post, good source by hardburn · · Score: 2

    We should all know about the wonderful editorial integrity of the Washington Post.

    --
    Not a typewriter
  70. We can all rest easy... by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

    According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code

    Oh well, in that case!

  71. Washinton Post by morcego · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have the link to the fore mentioned Washington Post article ?

    --
    morcego
    1. Re:Washinton Post by morcego · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that. Didn't notice Newbyte belongs to the Washington Post ...

      My mistake.

      --
      morcego
  72. oh no. by vinnythenose · · Score: 1

    Oh no, I can see the anti-MS headlines now: "Microsoft coding with the enemy" and other such crap.

    Well, I guess this is our chance to really see how well MS' coding processes prevent malicious code.

    And before you bash MS, remember that theoretically terrorists and other such people could be programming in open source as well and creating malicious code for Linux, so this isn't necessarily a windows specific security risk.

    Although I believe it's crap and untrue.

    --
    --- I used to moderate, then I read the -1 articles and decided having to filter through them was not worth it.
  73. Whew! by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    no evidence of malicious code in the operating system has been reported.

    So the rumors that XP will refuse to load "unauthorized" audio device drivers, were really just rumors.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  74. Would they need any help? by atheos · · Score: 1

    I don't think Microsoft would need any help in placing Bugs in their software.
    They are quite capable of doing this themselves, without the assistance of all those ANTI-INTERNET hackers in the Al Qaeda!!

  75. Confession? by O2n · · Score: 2

    Prasad, moderator of an Internet mailing list on south Asia security and information warfare, told Newsbytes that Afroze made the claims in a police confession.

    Even if the story is true, and the guy "confessed"... I know I'd confess to writing windows XP if faced with a rubber hose.

    Think about it...

    1. Re:Confession? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      I know I'd confess to writing windows XP...

      So *YOU'RE* the guy to blame for WPA?

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  76. What will be next by Matthias+Wiesmann · · Score: 2

    Funny how /bin/laden has passed from mere mortal to a incarnation of evil, and as such responsible for all bad things.

    Yesterday he was responsible for crashing the US economy. Today he is responsible for bugs in XP. Tommorow he will be responsible for sour milks, bad weather, disrespectfull children...

    1. Re:What will be next by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Yesterday he was responsible for crashing the US economy. Today he is responsible for bugs in XP. Tommorow he will be responsible for sour milks, bad weather, disrespectfull children...

      Not if we kill him.

    2. Re:What will be next by spankfish · · Score: 2

      Thank you, Mr. Goldstein! I mean. Erm. Yes.

      --

      NO TOUCH MONKEY!
  77. Redunant? by utdpenguin · · Score: 1
    Wouldn't this be redundant? Whats hte matter? Don't we trust M$ to screw up their software enough on their own?


    Ok, but seriusly, Even I dont beleive M$ is this stupid and so I will treat this article with extreme scepticism. Is these suppsoed trojans and what not were really in palce wouldn't the terrosits be attmepting to expliot them? And how long could they do that without detection?

    I kind wish this were true, since it would be great ammo for people arguiing agianst security by obscurity, since this is a prime example of the potential problems of the model. However, as I said, I am highly sceptical.

    --
    In Soviet Russia you dant have to put up with these crappy jokes
  78. Some marvellous quotes here... by MikeCamel · · Score: 2

    "...members of Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda network, posing as computer programmers, were able to gain employment at Microsoft" - so, you can "pose" as a computer programmer, and get to modify M$'s source, can you? You don't actually have to be a programmer?

    Also, I liked "According to Desler [an M$ spokesman], Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code." Well, it's worked so far, hasn't it? Maybe they're just talking about how difficult it is to add intentional bugs. That, I can believe.

    The very suggestion that M$ needs help adding "trojans, trapdoors, and bugs in Windows XP," is the laughable bit here.

    1. Re:Some marvellous quotes here... by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      "...members of Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda network, posing as computer programmers, were able to gain employment at Microsoft" - so, you can "pose" as a computer programmer, and get to modify M$'s source, can you? You don't actually have to be a programmer?

      Why, MicroSoft keeps posing as an innovative technology company ...

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  79. good lord by banky · · Score: 5, Funny

    (Outside of an Al Queda recruitment center)
    "OK, people. Line to the left is suicide bombers, center line is front line soldiers, right-hand, nefarious computer geeks."

    or
    (2 terrorists meet to discuss their accomplishments)
    "I have struck a great blow against Satan! I have planted bombs and anthrax!"
    "I, too, have stuck a great blow!"
    "What did you do?"
    "Improper bounds checking in msetl23.dll! I used my own hasty, roll-your-own strcpy()! And as a final coup de gras*, I stole 3 product activation keys and gave them to Best Buy employees"

    Please.

    * terrorists may not actually use phrases like this. Consult your manual.

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    1. Re:good lord by VB · · Score: 2, Funny



      Pardoning me Shaek Mohammad Mohamed Banky, but did you not mean "Praise Allah?"

      --
      www.dedserius.com
      VB != VisualBasic
  80. Terrorists Not needed by KingKire64 · · Score: 1

    Like we need terrorists for there to be problems like that that with windows? The Terrorists probably inadvertently fixed some of the "FEATURES" that come with Windows

    --
    "All I can tell the "lesser of two evils" folks is that if they keep voting for evil, they'll keep getting evil."-Lp.org
  81. Loco by cygnusx · · Score: 2
    Anybody else noticed this in the article:

    A defense attorney hired by Afroze's father, a tailor by profession, reportedly asked the court to allow Afroze to receive a psychiatric examination but was rejected.


    The guy sure sounds loco to me.
  82. Sweet! by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 1

    So how long before a squadron of B-52 Stratofortress long range bombers is dispatched from Minot AFB to a certain location in the state of Washington?

  83. [sigh] by yamla · · Score: 1

    As if anyone would notice if Windows XP had a few more holes.

    Besides, it looks fairly clear to me after reading the article that this guy was simply delusional.

    --

    Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
  84. more astroturfing? by esoteric0 · · Score: 0

    i agree, it sounds like another form of astroturfing on the part of linux enthusiasts. on the other hand, it's a good thing all those governments are switching to linux.

  85. I worked on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I put a buffer overflow in the network layer that gives me remote root on machines running XP. Actually, they would call it "ability to run arbitrary code," but that's what it is. I no longer work for Microsoft (I couldn't stand the way they don't respect their customers), but it is easy for me to imagine that other people could have done the same thing.

    1. Re:I worked on XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm Linus Torvalds and I put 20 buffer overflow and file corruption bugs in the kernel so I can take over the world when Linux is king! You MUST BELIVE ME BECAUSE I SAID IT! (Please ignore the part about this being an anonymous post)

  86. Is this surprising? by Spencerian · · Score: 1

    Hell, we all know how well Windows runs, anyway. Hard to think that POS really HASN'T been hacked for terrorist purposes since its inception. It's certainly kept quite a few of us hostage already! :)

    ...

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  87. Microsoft interviews by bartle · · Score: 2

    As someone who has been through the Microsoft interview process, I find it highly doubtful that some random terrorist programmers could make it though.

    Unless, of course, Al Qaeda makes learning how to get 5 gallons of liquid using 3 and 7 gallon containers part of their training.

    1. Re:Microsoft interviews by Durrik · · Score: 1

      I haven't gone through the interview process, but I know several people who have. And there's no way that a non-programmer can 'pose as a programmer' and get through the interviews.

      My friends that went through the process found it very intense. And while we all dislike the products that get sent out from Microsoft, I don't think anyone will disagree that they hire some of the best programmers out there. You might be able to 'pose as a programmer' like the article says, but there's no way you can pose as a programmer of the caliber that Microsoft hires without being one.

      The article seems to read (and I might be reading things into the article) that the terrorists posed as programmers, were hired, made the backdoors and then left. Almost like they walked in with a breifcase and then walked out. This is just crazy, appart from what other people have said with code reviews and other processes to make sure this doesn't happen, the complexity of an OS prevents this.

      I work on a relitively small project, the core protocol for a cellphone, and it takes on average 6-10 months of working with the code before you can understand the complexity of it. I hate to think of how long the average programmer at Microsoft goes through to learn the code enough to make backdoors that avoid detection past code reviews.

      With an OS as complex as WinXP, I would assume that it would take a good year before anyone knows enough about just one small section to make a backdoor. And that would probably be easy to find. To hide the backdoor it would probably have to cross several sections of the code, you just can't do it with a handful of people posing as programmers. You'd probably have to do the backdoor as a small software project, just to handle the complexities of it.

      IMHO, if there's a backdoor in there, then it was put in there with full knowledge of Microsoft. More likely if there were terrorists posing as programmers, they found a backdoor that Microsoft put in there for the government, and not made the backdoor themselves.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
    2. Re:Microsoft interviews by Warvi · · Score: 1

      Are you joking or trying to troll? There are very smart people among these terrorists. If you think the most dangerous terrorists are fighting in Afghanistan, you are wrong. Maybe 'random terrorist programmers' wouldn't make it through the Microsoft interview process, but a 'highly educated, higly motivated fanatic with IQ over 160' has a quite good change.

      Btw, you don't consider your example anything more than trivial do you?

      --


      Consistency is overrated.
    3. Re:Microsoft interviews by bartle · · Score: 2

      My friends that went through the process found it very intense. And while we all dislike the products that get sent out from Microsoft, I don't think anyone will disagree that they hire some of the best programmers out there.

      Well, for me it was pretty much an all day interview lasting for ~12 hours. There were around 6 interviewers that I moved between throughout the day, each interview lasted between 1 and 2 hours. This pretty much eclipses any interviews I've had before and since, I felt pretty much drained at the end of the day.

      The joke is that they ask a lot of brainteasers. For every question involving pseudo-code, there was another that had nothing to do with programming whatsoever. I presume this is to make sure they do hire the best and brightest, and my time there confirmed to me that they do indeed.

      Anyway, to reward any poor souls who actually stumbled across this message, I'll give you my favorite of the Microsoft interview questions:

      You have two containers, one contains a red liquid and the other contains a blue liquid, and they both contain an equal amount. Someone takes a scoop and moves 10% of the blue liquid into the red container. Then after stirring the red container, the same scoop is used move the same amount of liquid from the red container back into the blue.

      Both containers now have an equal amount of liquid each, but they both contain red and blue liquids now. The question is: which is more pure, the red or blue container?

    4. Re:Microsoft interviews by gowen · · Score: 2
      The question is: which is more pure, the red or blue container?
      They're the same. How could they possibly be anything but the same?
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    5. Re:Microsoft interviews by d-e-w · · Score: 1

      The blue container, right?

      (Because, the liquid transferred from the red container to the blue container is already a mixture of blue and red; therefore, there is less red in the blue container than blue in the red container.)

    6. Re:Microsoft interviews by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      They test logic and reasoning far more than they do programming skill, or fluency with Windows programming software. I doubt that programmers are the only ones who have enough reasoning skills to pass the interviews.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    7. Re:Microsoft interviews by d-e-w · · Score: 1

      They're the same. How could they possibly be anything but the same?

      *sigh* I should think through before I post. I thought there was a situation in which blue would be purer than red, but I haven't been able to devise one. That one is mean! ;)

    8. Re:Microsoft interviews by StevenMaurer · · Score: 0, Troll

      Boy did you flunk this! The Red container holds a solution of 90% Red & 10% Blue; the Blue Container holds a solution of 90% Blue & 10% Red/Blue mixture. In other words, the Blue container contains 91% Blue 9% Red, and is therefore more "pure".

      This is a basic high-school algebra word problem. I'm not sure what's more scary: that this is all Microsoft expects of their programmers, or that the typical Slashdot reader can't solve it.

    9. Re:Microsoft interviews by bartle · · Score: 1

      Boy did you flunk this!

      No, he got it exactly right. If after mixing the two liquids, each container contains the same amount of liquid, they must have the same purity. Essentially the logic is the same as if you took both liquids, mixed them together in a large container, and split the mixture back into two containers. So long as both containers have the same quantity of liquid, the will have the same purity level.

      The brain frying part of the question is that most engineering students will have the tendancy to solve the problem mathematically. I haven't met anybody who successfully figured it out by doing it this way.

    10. Re:Microsoft interviews by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      They're the same. How could they possibly be anything but the same?

      1 full cup of blue liquid has been put into the red container. At this point, the blue is more pure because the red has been contaminated.

      After stirring the red up, one cup is transferred back into the blue container. This cup that is being transferred contains ~95% red and ~5% blue (percentages will change based on the amount of original liquid, but you get the idea).

      So while the red had been contaminated with 100% of 1 cup, the blue has only been contaminated with 95% of the same volume. Thus, there is more blue liquid in the red bucket than there is red liquid in the blue bucket.

      So the answer is, the blue is more pure.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    11. Re:Microsoft interviews by patco15 · · Score: 1

      So while the red had been contaminated with 100% of 1 cup, the blue has only been contaminated with 95% of the same volume. Thus, there is more blue liquid in the red bucket than there is red liquid in the blue bucket.

      But you forget that you are moving some of that "100% of 1 cup back. For those that are having trouble seeing that they're the same, try it with numbers...

      Assume:
      Starting size = 400ml
      Cup size = 40 ml (orignial post said 10%, so I'll use that)

      Start with 400 ml blue, 400 ml red. Remove 40 ml from blue jar. Blue jar now 360 ml blue. Add to red. Red jar now 400 ml red, 40 ml blue. Remove 40 ml from red jar. We remove 36 ml red, 4 ml blue. Red jar now 364 ml red, 36 ml blue. Add (36 ml red, 4 ml blue) to blue jar. Blue jar now 364 ml blue 36 ml red.

      See, they match. I didn't believe it until I tried it either though...

      --
      Sig.

    12. Re:Microsoft interviews by M-G · · Score: 2
      Let's run through things, with a couple of changes to keep thing straight. Let's say we have Container A, which has 10 gallons of red paint, and Container B, which has 10 gallons of blue.

      In our first step, we transfer 10% of the blue paint into Container A:

      Container A
      • 10 gal red
      • 1 gal blue
      Container B
      • 0 gal red
      • 9 gal blue

      We stir Container A, and we can say it has the following makeup:

      Container A
      • 10/11 x 11 gal red
      • 1/11 x 11 gal blue

      We now take a gallon of this mixture and transfer it to Container B, so we have the following:

      Container A
      • 10/11 x 10 gal red
      • 1/11 x 10 gal blue

      Container B

      • 10/11 x 1 gal red
      • 1/11 x 1 gal blue
      • 9 gal blue

      There are a number of ways to do the math from here, but it boils to them both being equally pure:

      Container A
      • 9 1/11 gal red
      • 0 10/11 gal blue
      Container B
      • 0 10/11 gal red
      • 9 1/11 gal blue
    13. Re:Microsoft interviews by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2
      No, he got it exactly right

      Wow - I thought about it again, and I convinced myself that you're right. I tried to look at it from countable quantities (you could count the molecules in the liquid, after all).

      Take two empty cups, one (A) with 100 dollar coins [1], one (B) with 100 cent coins. Move 10 dollars from cup A into the cent cup (B). "Mix". Take 1 dollar and 9 cents back from cup B into cup A. [2]

      Now cup A contains 91 dollars 9 cents, cup B contains 9 dollars 91 cents. So each are 9/91 pure.

      A more concise view of the problem is: any coin taken from cup A get's replaced by a coin from cup B. If it's the same coin, then nothing changes (they retain the purity they had before) if it's a different coin, then it dilutes both sets in the same way.

      My problem with this sort of test is, that you can think too little, and come up with the right answer, too. :)

      [1] Finding the coins is left as an excercise for the reader.

      [2] You wouldn't necessarily get that mix, but it's very close to the average - try with 1000 coins each, if that worries you. (And you have enough money.)

    14. Re:Microsoft interviews by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2

      Bzzt, wrong.

      Correct answer: Each container contains the same amount of blue paint as the other does red, therefore it's the same.

      Trying to do an explanation like you did shows that you did not have the abstract thinking which is exactly what the testers were looking for by asking the question.

    15. Re:Microsoft interviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a retarded question.

      Imagine it as balls instead of liquid;
      if you put 10 blue balls into 100 red balls and then took 10 of those balls, 1 of those 10 should be blue leaving 9 blue behind in the red and placing 9 red in the blue. Equal contamination.

      Substitute blue/red for anthrax/smallpox and any terrorist worth his salt would pass. Voila!

      - or should I say "Allah!"

    16. Re:Microsoft interviews by StevenMaurer · · Score: 1

      You're right, I'm wrong. I thought about it later, and realized I'd screwed up, but you know Slashdot - you can't unpost anything.

      Go ahead, mod me down as a Troll or Offtopic! I've got too many Karma points to care. Bwah ha ha ha ha!

    17. Re:Microsoft interviews by M-G · · Score: 2

      Uh, sorry, but my answer is exactly the same as you have given. However, I worked through an EXAMPLE of the problem to show that the answer is correct. A bunch of previous posters had given the wrong answer, so I ran through the example.

      While you've given the correct answer, you didn't show how you arrive there, so as far as anyone can tell, you made a wild-ass guess (or copied the answer out of the back of the book without showing your work).

      And sorry, but my posting a thorough example shows nothing about my abstract thinking abilities.

    18. Re:Microsoft interviews by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      Hey, cool. I didn't even think of it that way. Thank you for the correction!

      (ps, what stupid fuck moderated my original comment 'overrated'? Off-topic, maybe, but overrated? This is the problem with Slashdot: Any moron can moderate.)

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    19. Re:Microsoft interviews by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      The example doesn't show anything of the sort (at best, it fails to show that the answer "they're both the same" is wrong). Certainly, if you were thinking about the problem and did not see the answer immediately, you would try to work through an example. But you would not offer this example as your final answer, since it is merely useful as a stage of working in your head (not as a stage of working in giving a rigorous proof).

  88. mmmm Scapegoats by TopFlite211 · · Score: 1

    "It's not XP crashing, XP is perfect, it's those darn terrorists! Damn you Osama!"

    or...

    "It's not a bug, it's an 'Al Quaedean Feature'"

  89. Its Bert! by LM741N · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now whenever an appication crashes I get a picture of Bert from Sesame street!

  90. One joke in the article by truthsearch · · Score: 2

    According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code.

    Hahaha... that's how you can be sure this article's a hoax.

  91. How long until... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... the first caricatures of Bill Gates with beard and turban start to appear.

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  92. Not as easy as you might think by Transient0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not to mention that the whole story is hanging on very tentative ground.

    In the first place, I notice that man is a "suspected" Al Qaeda member. From what I've been seeing lately, anyone who has the wrong kind of accent or a copy of the Koran is a suspected Al Qaeda Member.

    Secondly, if this man really is a member of the organization, it should be noted that bravado and misinformation are prime terrorist tactics. It's a lot easier to spread rumours about having planted bombs, or for that matter created software bugs, than it is to actually do it. And you still get the result of people being afraid to fly or afraid to use Windows.

    Thirdly, as you said, even if some programmers with less than noble intentions did manage to get employed at Microsoft, the chance that they would be able to intentionally slip in a trojan horse without it being caught in testing are pretty low.

    On the other hand, i suppose they couls just sabotage the american way of life by writing bad code, but then Microsoft pays people to do that anyway.

  93. For once, I'm sympathising with MS by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    • A suspected member of the Al Qaeda terrorist network claimed that Islamic militants infiltrated Microsoft and sabotaged the company's Windows XP operating system, according to a source close to Indian police.

    Look at the effect they've already had on the global airline and tourist industries, based on a net increase in danger that's insignificant compared to road deaths. Score one for the terrorists.

    And here come the ill considered security measures and infringements of civil liberties. We defend Freedom by taking it away. Score two.

    Then it was time to target the the government, postal service and law enforcement with a few packets of a not particularly lethal virus (sympathies to the victims though). Again, the big impact is from the FUD, as law enforcement chase hoaxes and benign packages all over the country. Score three.

    Now it's software. "All your code base belong to us!" they rant. Expect the hoaxers to jump on this and a new rash of bin Laden themed virii and worms to appear. It's pure FUD, but the problem is reassuring easily frightened and confused non-techies that it isn't true. How do you disprove the existence of allegedly hidden code?

    And so for once I'm actually going to get on the bandwagon with Microsoft and give this zero credibility. This pathetic piece of bluster should not be allowed to put anyone off using XP. There's plenty of real reasons for not using it, but this isn't one of them.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by gowen · · Score: 2
      Then it was time to target the the government, postal service and law enforcement with a few packets of a not particularly lethal virus
      Has it been ascertained that this was the work of Al-Qaeda (or any Islamist terrorists). To my knowledge, that was never satisfactorily shown.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by wurp · · Score: 2

      Anthrax is a bacterium, not a virus.

    3. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by hotsauce · · Score: 1

      Now it's software. "All your code base belong to us!" they rant.

      It's "All your code base are belong to us!". Please learn the grammer.

    4. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by Mr.+Barky · · Score: 1

      No. There is no evidence of who did it.

      My opinion is that it is most likely domestic right-wing nuts taking advantage of a confused situation. Why? Look at who the targets were. Two Democratic senators and members of the "libral" media. If it were Al Qaeda, then they would have added targets such as the White House, Dennis Hassert (speaker of the house), the Wall Street Journal (what better symbol of American corruption?). I mean, Patrick Leahy over Dennis Hassert???

    5. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Anthrax is a bacterium, not a virus.

      Ouch, idiot rash, I knew that. On the other hand, I'm strangely pleased that it slipped my mind. The most meaningful contribution that I (as Joe Public) can make to fighting terrorists is just to ignore their attempts to spread FUD. The WTC was an appaling human tragedy, but not one that's going to make me hide in a bunker or obsessively follow every context free shock-o-rama news report.

      Let's keep this in context: every day that we report that someone has died from Anthrax, report how many people died from influenza. Every time a terrorist claims that there might be backdoors or bugs in WinXP, remind ourselves that Microsoft might have left plenty in there all by themselvs, and yet the world keeps turning.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    6. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by wurp · · Score: 1

      Good points all. Mostly, I saw your 'monkey people' post and wondered how you would respond to criticism. You passed ;)

    7. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by MadAhab · · Score: 2
      It's also highly unlikely to be the work of Islamic terrorists. The strain used has been fingerprinted as belonging to the US military industrial complex. Every sign points to a US origin. Nothing indicates that al Qaeda would or could do something so cute as create false clues that would make us think it was domestic terrorism. But no right-leaning Americans would ever commit terrorism in the US, right? I mean, hadn't you wondered why al Qaeda seemed to hate liberal politicians?

      Both al Qaeda and their anti-Semitic admirers in the US (the likely source of the anthrax mailings) had exactly the same delusion that Charles Manson had - that they could start chaos that would destroy the US, and they would be recognized as heroes and invited to become the new leaders. It's just not that easy. Plus Charlie was probably a better lay than them and wasn't as hairy as Bin Laden and "only" killed a few people.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    8. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by DarkProphet · · Score: 1

      On the contrary. I believe that the Al-Qaida are the probably anthrax culprits. Haven't you understood what this war is about? How did the twin towers fall? Some assholes hijacked a few domestic planes. They basically turned our own infrastructure against us. How ironic that the US would suffer a blow from itself. Obviously the American infedels are really the satan-spawn Al-Qaida believes us to be. Understand the mentality at all? Its highly plausible that supplies of Anthrax in the US were stolen, to be used against us. Again, poetic justice for the terrorists who wish to see our great nation destroy itself (so to speak).

      Although I enjoy a good conspiracy theory as much as anyone, and its definitely in the realm of possibility that the Anthrax scare is/was perpetrated by US citizens. Possibly even government officials. A scare like that sure makes the war close to home, no? Without further threat at home, eventually the populous would question our motions abroad (people tend to have an "out of sight, out of mind" mentality about things, as a general rule).

      Anyhow, getting back on topic, I find it highly unlikely that any organization could have infiltrated a multi-billion dollar company like MS and used the company to cripple the world. It sounds like a good backstory though.. heh. I'm sure Silly Billy Gates is smart enough to realize that his company cannot suffer a blow like that, and proper measures are in place. Legitimate (heh) bugs and security holes would seem to be a lot harder to find than an intentional backdoor or whatever. Unless whole projects were completed by terrorists, its highly unlikely that something intentional would go unseen, but I concede its still possible. Still, I think its much more likely that this bit of news gives MS a scapegoat for any bad things that surface in XP or .Net. Maybe MS is next in like after the Airlines for government aid? *l*

      --
      What could possibly hurt the security of the American people more than giving our own government the ability to hide its
    9. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by screwtheNSA · · Score: 0

      Okay, then it's a bacterium virus...the strain that's even costlier for C+ coders as it changes it into java and then*cough*CP/M...OH MY OSAMA! The Al Qaeda have just purchased a McDonalds and are now serving billions bullshit MS XP brand happy meals with anthrax laced shakes and fries in a small skoal-like circular container....*Just a pinch between your cheek and gum, and you're all done* I hear that the Al Qaed just bough ten NEW IBM punch card computer system "mainframes" and received ten free teletype printers at no charge..(punch cards not included). *Stupid comments are for everybody's enoyment, not just the "novelist's*

      --
      206.39.38.2, DDN-BLK-36, DOD NET INFO CENTER. 800.365.3642 206.36.0.0-206.39.255.255 NET RANGE.
    10. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a not particularly lethal virus

      I never heard of this. Perhaps you are referring to the bacterial attacks with B. anthracis?

    11. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Anthrax is a disease.
      Bacillus anthracis is a bacterium.

    12. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like Anthrax was from domestic source. Please don't hastily put blame. Oklahoma was blamed on the muslims, too.

    13. Re:For once, I'm sympathising with MS by wurp · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know, I was being verbally lazy, but I wanted a quip, not a paragraph.

  94. Maybe... by jd · · Score: 1
    This explains the flight simulator in Excell! They wanted something to practice on, between flying lessons!


    P.S. If anyone's interested, I've set up a petition to have FUD declared "economic terrorism". Hey, at worst, nothing'll happen. At best, we get to see the USAF drop a Daisy Cutter on Microsoft HQ, before the army storms what's left.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how would one find that flight sim in excel??

  95. Bill Gates hacks Linux kernel? by mummers · · Score: 1

    Well, it would explain his current cheerful demeanour :-)

    --
    --This isn't a man who is leaving with his head between his legs.
  96. Yeah by Byteme · · Score: 1
    I was wondering where that Osama screensaver came from.

  97. Al-Qaeda just wants "first-post" rights... by coupland · · Score: 2

    Probably nothing more than an indication that al-Qaeda are Linux buffs and wanted to see their names on /.

  98. How to get rid of It! by ASyndicate · · Score: 4, Funny

    # chflags noschg /bin/laden
    # rm -f /bin/laden

    Warning: Utitilty /bin/laden removed. Will replace with something even more evil.

    # ln /bin/microsoft /bin/laden
    # chflags schg /bin/laden
    # chflags schg /bin/microsoft

    Thank you for removing /bin/laden

    --
    This page left intentionally blank.
    1. Re:How to get rid of It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $ echo 3clodrb@3dfq3qba.kbq | tr [3a-z] [ad-y]
      3clodrb@3dfq3qba.kbq

  99. Internation released.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    Actually, something occured to me that makes it a little bit more possible. I once read somewhere on MSDN regarding the realease of localized versions of Microsofts OSes ad applications where generally localized by outside contractors, such as those used in India, etc..

    This could have, indeed, made it a great deal easier to insert some hidden #ifdef inside of, say, a comment that looks funny, and cause some issues such as providing uid checks, etc..

    Perhaps I'm just thinking to much. It's amazing how easy something appears to be if you can think about it long enough..

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  100. No malicious code in XP! by bahtama · · Score: 1
    From the article: While the company has already issued security patches for the software, no evidence of malicious code in the operating system has been reported.

    OK, who wants to take this one? They are just making this too easy for us! ;)

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

  101. In other news... by sheldon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Members of the militant group Hamas have claimed responsibility for file corruption issue found in the Linux 2.4.15 kernel.

    1. Re:In other news... by Rand+Race · · Score: 2, Funny
      I've had a sinking feeling for a while now that the Tamil Tigers are primarily responsible for Mac OS X's sluggish finder.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    2. Re:In other news... by sheldon · · Score: 1

      Obviously I'm being moderated down by militant Hamas representatives who don't want you to know the truth!

  102. WTF! by bill0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code.

    muahahaha, now, *THAT* was funny.

  103. It isn't our fault! by gosand · · Score: 2
    Yeah, that's the ticket. The Al-Queda did it. They are the reason that XP sucks. Yeah. We didn't do nothin, you hear?

    The largest case of FUD EVER!

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  104. Microsoft Portection by CamMac · · Score: 1

    According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code.

    Which consists of releasing it to the public and ignoring the bug reports.

    --Cam

    --
    All jocks think about is sports. All nerds think about is sex.
  105. oh the misery. by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

    Too bad this is just a joke, if there were any truth to it and M$ actually had to go through their hundreds of millions of lines of code to find something like this.. they'd be doing it for a WHILE to come.

    --

    Liberty.

  106. More like JOD by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 1

    Jihad of Death

    --
    mp3's are only for those with bad memories
    1. Re:More like JOD by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      Jihad of Death

      Shouldn't the be moderated redundant? :)

  107. now this is serious fud... by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

    i am not an ms fan, in fact part of the reson this story will be successful is because of ms's history of poor quality management and it's closed source systems, but this article is most likely fud. after all, it's easier to *say* you've planted such things in xp then to actually do it. and since ms has a poor track record for security and since there is no public peer review of their code, it will certainly cause reasonable people fear, uncertainty and doubt about microsoft's software.

    truly a case of reaping what you sow. ah, how amusing.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  108. Can't find it in the Washington Post by wiredog · · Score: 2

    Anyone got a link to it?

  109. Its nice to know... by Boulder+Geek · · Score: 2
    That Al Queda knows why manhole covers are round...

    --
    A well-crafted lie appears unquestionable - Dama Mahaleo
    1. Re:Its nice to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it because round manhole covers plug up your anus really well? Hey, plug your manhole...

  110. well... by macsox · · Score: 1

    thank god slashcode at least is safe.

  111. It would be more likely... by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

    ...for the saboteur to insert something into a product other than the kernel. Say, apache, or maybe samba. Or maybe mozilla. Or maybe even in a development product which is modified to turn a blind eye to certain types of defects, like buffer overruns.

    Hell, just knowing the general class of vulnerability that one can expect to find is a big leg up for an attacker.

    The point is that it could happen in any product. Really, how do you know that the spanky new game you're playing didn't open your system to attacks? It really isn't complicated and getting someone into a game company to do that sort of thing wouldn't be difficult.

    But the real question is, what then? The contaminated code in question would need to execute in some sort of proximity to a resource that matters (think banks here).

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  112. Haha, pretty funny by Uttles · · Score: 2

    But I don't understand how people thought it was Off Topic, I mean OBL is the ring leader of Al Quieda (sp?)

    --

    ~ now you know
  113. Broader Conspiracy at Work Here by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    Younger readers may not be familiar with a similar earlier threat to the American Way of Life.

    Fluoridated water was widely suspected to a communist plot , mostly to induce widespread sterility.

    Fortunately, alert citizens foiled the effort by placing their water in quart-sized glass jars on top of American flags in direct sunlight for several hours prior to drinking. As a consequence, the intended effect of sterility was mitigated and the only after effects of the threat have been the subnormal intelligence of offspring.

    At least, that's what I heard from my father.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Broader Conspiracy at Work Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist perversion and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

      I only drink branch water and grain alcohol. Women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I do not avoid women, but I deny them my essence.

  114. Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blatently a hoax - why would anyone bother planting bugs in a MS product?

  115. Teletubbies wallpaper! by simetra · · Score: 1

    That would explain the Teletubbies wallpaper.
    Teletubbies, like the al Qaeda (sp?), live in a cave-like dwelling!
    They have funny things on the tops of their heads!

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  116. In OTHER Slow News... by dygytyz · · Score: 1

    Scottish invent pay toilet - expect huge returns.

    French pad rifles to prevent damage when dropped.

    Washington post source of credible news, CmdrTaco says.

    Come on...

    --
    Mmmm... Pistol Whip...
  117. It turns out... by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 4, Funny

    It turns out that al Qaeda is actually a bitter DR-DOS user group.

    1. Re:It turns out... by dhamsaic · · Score: 1, Troll

      DUDE!

      YOU are a fucking pimp. That is all there is to it.

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
  118. WARNING: THIS IS ADVICE TO TERRORISTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Unless, of course, Al Qaeda makes learning how to get 5 gallons of liquid using 3 and 7 gallon containers part of their training.

    Fill the 5 gal container.

    Pour from the 5 gal into the 3 gal container.

    Discard the 3 gal in the 3 gal container.

    Pour the remainder into the 3 gal container

    Refill the 5 gal container.

    1. Re:WARNING: THIS IS ADVICE TO TERRORISTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, wrong...

    2. Re:WARNING: THIS IS ADVICE TO TERRORISTS by gowen · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you'll find that starting with a 5 gallon container might be considered cheating.

      ObSoln:
      Fill 7
      (Fill 3 from 7:Discard 3) twice
      Decant remaining 1 from 7 to 3.
      Fill 7. Top up 3 from 7, leaving 5 in 7.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    3. Re:WARNING: THIS IS ADVICE TO TERRORISTS by special_ed209 · · Score: 1

      Another solution:
      Fill 3, pour into 7
      Repeat. (Now there are 6 gallons in the 7.)
      Fill 3, top off 7 with 1 gallon from 3.
      Discard 7.
      Pour the remaining 2 gallons in 3 into 7.
      Fill 3, pour into 7, and voy-lah.

      --
      Meanwhile, the world turns foolishly on and ants tickle his butt.
    4. Re:WARNING: THIS IS ADVICE TO TERRORISTS by gowen · · Score: 1

      Nice. I missed that one. Now, I believe that in the spirit of /. we have to squabble like children over whose solution is best. (Incidentally, your solution totally SuX A55 d00d)

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    5. Re:WARNING: THIS IS ADVICE TO TERRORISTS by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      gowen's solution uses 14 gallons total and discards 6, leaving the 3 gallon full for 9 wasted gallons.

      special_ed209 uses 12 gallons, and discards 7.

      Also, gowen's solution seems to be quicker, but requires you to carry the full 7 gallon container from the well (or faucet) twice. That's about 56 pounds. special_ed209's solution requires four trips with the 3 gallon container, at only 24 pounds (this reminds me of why Imperial measurements suck - liters and kilograms would be much simpler to deal with).

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    6. Re:WARNING: THIS IS ADVICE TO TERRORISTS by mikewas · · Score: 1

      Obvious solution (short form):
      1. fill each bucket to more than half full
      2. tilt each bucket until liquid just reaches the intersection of the base & the wall at the bottom of the bucket
      3. each bucket is now exactly half full, so you have 1.5 gallons + 3.5 gallons = 5 gallons.

      The problem statement doesn't require that the 5 gallons be in a single bucket.

      Note that this makes some assumptions about the symmetry of the buckets.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    7. Re:WARNING: THIS IS ADVICE TO TERRORISTS by special_ed209 · · Score: 1

      I think that the analysis by ShavenYak (er...OK) proves beyond a reasonable doubt that my solution is better, given its better conservation statistics and the conspicuous absence of the prospect of carrying weighty things.

      In conclusion, I am so 1337.

      --
      Meanwhile, the world turns foolishly on and ants tickle his butt.
    8. Re:WARNING: THIS IS ADVICE TO TERRORISTS by BluBrick · · Score: 2

      Cheating?

      When all you need is 5 gallons, it makes really good busines sense to trade in the 3 and the 7 for a single 5.

      That's a better answer than the correct one. And that's BOUND to make a good impression as M$.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  119. Why bother? by bhurt · · Score: 2

    Why spend the time, money, and effort to sneak someone into Microsoft to add a back door? Look at the damage done by Goner, Sircam, LoveBug, and all the rest using the front door! Anyone talented enough to a) get a job at Microsoft (even as an H1B temp), b) add a back door or timebomb to the XP code, and c) do it in such a way that it doesn't get noticed, has enough talent to stay at home and write lovebug knockoffs.

    Brian

  120. Other al Qaeda plots to consider by Exedore · · Score: 1

    Among the other pointless and redundant al Qaeda plots recently discovered:

    • Spiking Ted Kennedy's lunchtime beverage with gin and vermouth
    • Infiltrating Firestone tire plants to introduce manufacturing flaws
    • Replace the CEO's of Oracle, Sun, and Microsoft with arrogant megalomaniacs, throwing the US IT industry into utter dissaray
    • Tempting government officials with cheap floozies to discredit their moral authority
    --

    I take drugs seriously.

    1. Re:Other al Qaeda plots to consider by richardbowers · · Score: 2
      Among the other pointless and redundant al Qaeda plots recently discovered:
      • Spiking Ted Kennedy's lunchtime beverage with gin and vermouth
      Not to mention...
      • Convincing people that there was something special about SHT.
      • Setting the maximum file descriptors per process on Solaris 2.5.1 to 1024.
      • Writing business plans for dot-coms
      • Telling Adobe about DEF-CON's speakers this year
      • Convincing Microsoft that C developers would pronounce C# as something other than C-pound.
      • And, the number one thing they've done to us - introducing the newsmakers to the cliche, "if we don't ****, the terrorists have won."
      --
      Law is whatever is boldly asserted and plausibly maintained. -- Aaron Burr
    2. Re:Other al Qaeda plots to consider by screwtheNSA · · Score: 0

      Unarmed men are usually helpless as well! *Ted Kennedy killed more people than I ever did with my guns!

      --
      206.39.38.2, DDN-BLK-36, DOD NET INFO CENTER. 800.365.3642 206.36.0.0-206.39.255.255 NET RANGE.
  121. XP embedded! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    With all the hype about XP embedded lately.
    I can see the following code hidden:

    if (hardware == plane)
    crash(); //as if this is a different code path

    Who needs to sacrifice pilots.

  122. It's a hoax people by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    It this was true, Al-Qaeda would have already won the war by now.

    For some reason, they want us to believe that Ben Laden and his Al-Qaeda group are more powerfull than they really are.

  123. gotta be a hoax. by RogueAngel7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm as anti-Microsoft as the next guy (well, probably more anti-MS then most actually), but this has to be a hoax.

    If a terrorist organization did succed in infiltrating MS and backdooring thier OS, why would they say anything? it much more useful to them to keep it quiet. On the other hand, if they didn't succed in do it, saying they have is the next best thing. Remember terrorism thrives on scare tactics, and convincing your enemy to chase ghosts.

    the mear fact someone is taking credit for it before anyone else found out about it, means it probably didnt actually happen.

    RA7
    ---

    --
    "Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds" - RWE
  124. Taking credit for other people's havok... by coupland · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds to me like al-Qaeda is just looking to take credit for the chaos caused by others.

    "You will feel our wrath in the endless bugs and security holes in Windows XP!"

    What's next? "We will cause random car accidents in busy intersections and will lace cigarettes with deadly carcinogens!" OOooo, their prophecies are coming true, everybody! Head for the hills!

  125. How many daisy cutters by gaudior · · Score: 1

    would it take to reduce the MS campus to a system of caves?

  126. I wonder what Craig Mundies thoughts are now? by VonSnaggle · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Craig Mundie still thinks Linux is bad for companies and countries too.

    --
    if common sense was common, wouldn't everyone have it?
  127. al your Qaeda ... by StarEmperor · · Score: 1

    Since "al Qaeda" translates as "the base", I guess the XP easter egg is "al your Qaeda are belong to us". Or, given recent events, it might be more appropriate to say, "al your Qaeda are belong to U.S."

  128. Saddam PS2 by Apreche · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of when Saddam Insane bought all those PS2s.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  129. I knew it by MrTilney · · Score: 1
    PRESS RELEASE

    Al Queda terrorists have broken into Microsoft in an attempt to add secret back doors and trojans into Microsoft Windows XP. Some of the features include and email client that can propagate viruses without user intervention. Other trojan like viruses include a "feature" that requires users to turn over personal information including social security and credit card numbers to be stored in an easily hackable online database. A new feature, also reportedly added by the terrorists, requires users to call Microsoft when the computers hardware is updated, causing costly delays to the users workday. Ones ecurity expert is quoted as saying "This Windows release is the best virus propagation tool I've ever seen." A noted business analyst commented "This product causes the largest decrease in worker productivity since the LoveBug."

  130. Ah-ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code.

    Obviously, this story is a hoax.

  131. The subscribtion model is vindicated by voiceofthewhirlwind · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is generously preparing a 'terrorist free' version that will be ready in a few years, and all current XP users will be forced (you don't want the terrorist version floating around do you?) to buy it for the nominal price of several hundred dollars.

  132. Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft is just trying to compete with open source. It claims that open source is full of religious fanatics, so it's going all out and hiring even more extreme religious fanatics.

  133. Obviously Bullshit by Marcus+Brody · · Score: 2
    If you are going to put a backdoor in a product, there is one golden rule:


    Dont tell *anyone*.


    The events of september the 11th have shown us that al Qaeda are very, very good at keeping secrets.

    Therefore this is a hoax or deliberate scaremongering tactics.

  134. activation by crowke · · Score: 1

    so they were the ones who implemented the forced activation, I always knew this was a backdoor :)

  135. Al Qaeda's Elite Supercomputing Matrix by lwagner · · Score: 5, Funny
    9:05a. Breaking News... the alleged five teraflop Al Qaeda computer hax0ring complex has been penetrated by US Special Forces...

    7:30p. This just in - We have learned that the alleged Al Qaeda computing complex was destroyed. US Marines were seen removing five hourglasses, an abacus, and a piece of aluminum foil that were allegedly behind a massive recent distributed denial of service.

  136. Disinformation at its finest by Conspire · · Score: 1

    So, now what should happen, is this guy should be flown to the Antitrust case hearings as a witness. Surely the courts will finally realize the harsh punishment needed, for a company that can actually brainwash even the most anti-capitalist of terrorist organizations into getting Microsoft in the news!

    Oh and, after Microsoft releases an official press release on how this scenerio of planted bugs and holes in Microsoft is impossible, the public buys it all and is even MORE comfortable with the insecurity of XP. GREAT!

    Media spin at its best.

    --
    Real men don't need signitures!!!
  137. doesn't matter by dildofire · · Score: 1

    the only people using xp right now are regular users. no sensitive government information that could benefit al qaeda in any way will be put on xp for at least another 5 years, when most of the bugs have been rooted out of xp.

  138. So Much for Embedded XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess Al Qaeda was hoping to implant code that would automatically hijack planes to do their dirty work.

  139. This is so stupid of ./ by mochan_s · · Score: 1

    posing as computer programmers, were able to gain employment at Microsoft and attempted to plant "trojans, trapdoors, and bugs in Windows XP," How can you pose as a computer programmer? How can a non-programmer slip inside Microsoft and just plant trojans, trapdoors and bugs? OK. The article obviously says the person is in need to psychatric help. Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler said Afroze's claims about the company were "bizarre and unsubstantiated and should be treated skeptically." Slashdot isn't quite the skeptic when it comes to Microsoft. Come on, some loony clamining ridiculous things gets a headline in ./?

  140. an easier way to do this by Apps · · Score: 1

    It would be much easier for someone to just monitor the currently known security holes and act like a script kidie to exploit security holes. There are so many unpatched machines out there - why add your own holes?

  141. let me get this right by Apps · · Score: 1

    they had to ADD bugs/security holes to XP!!!

    bugs and security holes seem to appear there all by themselves;-)

  142. Evreyone is dismising this quickly, but... by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    As has been pointed aout alrady, this type of thing would not be hard to do for a well financed oganizatoin like AL Queda (getting someone hired t MS). And according to the article, this guy predicted the attack on the Indian Parliament which killed 7 people on thrusday. Surely this gives him a bit of credit, and his allegations should be investigated?

  143. But someone said it was in the Washington Post! by limejuice · · Score: 1

    It HAS to be true!

    --
    Daniel J. Kelly
    1. Re:But someone said it was in the Washington Post! by humanasset · · Score: 1

      The Washington Post did not provide any additional evidence that Windows XP has been altered, just the ratings of some terrorist suspect in India, whose motives must be questioned

      You would think that the Post would do a little investigating on their own to determine the validity of the claim. You have to question the source in this case.

      Pretty shoddy journalism if you ask me.

    2. Re:But someone said it was in the Washington Post! by limejuice · · Score: 1

      agreed.

      --
      Daniel J. Kelly
    3. Re:But someone said it was in the Washington Post! by trongey · · Score: 1

      You would think that the Post would do a little investigating on their own to determine the validity of the claim.

      Where did you get that absurd idea?
      The last time a journalist verified a story they had to crank a big handle to press the letters onto the paper.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    4. Re:But someone said it was in the Washington Post! by humanasset · · Score: 1

      Call me an idealist.

  144. NEWS FLASH by Limburgher · · Score: 0

    Windows XP found to be buggy and insecure! Industry insiders astounded!

    --

    You are not the customer.

  145. The Lone Coder by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 1

    You're all missing something here! The suspected Al Queda terrorist said a fellow member was at Microsoft putting these bugs in. Now most Al Queda terrorists aren't intelligent enough to understand the nuances of Visual Basic (much less C++ or Perl). Only one member of Al Queda is capable of doing this: Bill Mohammad Gates.

    --
    Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
  146. Give me a break! by FU_Fish · · Score: 1

    Come on now people! Do you have nothing better to do than make up stuff like this?

  147. MUHAHAHAHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill "Goat" Gates, that rapacious, materialistic infidel will be cowering on his knees before the wrath and pwoer of the children of Allah singing before I am done crushing his evil empire.

    ---Ahmed "Steve" Jobs Allah Akbar

  148. Re:not as easy as you might think - VERY EASY by Preylude · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have worked for several major software companies, including Microsoft, as a co-op.

    The standard practices at Microsoft do not include a lot of code review (even for a co-op). You could easily sneak stuff in there.

    That being said, I'll wait until I see proof before I believe this one.

    I have nothing to worry about, however. My standard practice is to never install a Microsoft OS until it has been "in the field" for -at least- a year :)

  149. Two counterpoints by Mr.+Fred+Smoothie · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In a million-plus line codebase for a product under deadline pressure, while official policy might be that "every line is checked", in reality this is highly unlikely to happen. The coders and their managers may assure the suits, "Yeah, we reviewd every line of code," but they'd be lying. It just doesn't happen. It's one of those things that everyone knows is *supposed* to happen and most people know doesn't *really* happen.

    Secondly, while I agree that it's unlikely that a terrorist would approach a 13-year old kid and say, "Hey, you should start excelling in Math and then attend college to get a CS degree so that 10 years from now you can go work at Microsoft for 4 years or so (enough to gain the confidence of your managers) and then start putting back doors and bugs in their OS," it's far more plausible that a terrorist would approach a already working programmer who's naive and idealistic -- and perhaps *already* working at and trusted by managers at Microsoft -- and say, "Hey, here's how you can really help your faith..."

    --

    1. Re:Two counterpoints by Geckoman · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And it's even more plausible that they would approach a disaffected, unhappy person regardless of faith -- who'd been working there for several years, feeling unappreciated the whole time -- and say, "Hey, here's a few ten thousand dollars tax free...we'll pay you and you get to screw your company!"

      And it's even more plausible that somebody just made this crap up, and the Washington Post bit on it like a hungry trout....

      "I saw it on the Internet, it must be true. Right, dad?"
      "Not necessarily, son, but I saw it printed on pieces of a dead tree, so that makes it true for sure!"

    2. Re:Two counterpoints by Tasty+Beef+Jerky · · Score: 0

      WPHBT!
      WPHL!
      WPHAND!

      --

      I'm the tasty treat nobody can resist!
      IM Me! AOL IM:Tasty Beef Jerky

    3. Re:Two counterpoints by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      I don't think they'd take the faith road... I think they'd take the money road...

      Here's 50K, put a nice backdoor in... Thanks...

      Money... keeping the spy game going since...um their was money...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    4. Re:Two counterpoints by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Maybe they promoted it kind of like the GI Bill here in America. Give us x years of service and you will come out of it with a great education and lots of experience to put on your resume.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    5. Re:Two counterpoints by boydtel · · Score: 1

      This is stupid, the case to meet isn't that -every- line be checked. The case would be that enough lines are checked that someone (not in the conspiracy) notices that someone (in the conspiracy) is trying to ship big gobs of trojans and crap into a code tree. I am not a programmer, but it is obvious to me that in the processes of testing and revising (let alone reviewing) chunks of code someone would notice some of this. (If in fact it were happening, wich is a hell of a stretch.) At that point, the FBI is only a toll free call away and every nerf gun in the hall (and a few of the OS guys can do better) is looking for the perp. Yeesh.

    6. Re:Two counterpoints by mpe · · Score: 2

      In a million-plus line codebase for a product under deadline pressure, while official policy might be that "every line is checked", in reality this is highly unlikely to happen. The coders and their managers may assure the suits, "Yeah, we reviewd every line of code," but they'd be lying. It just doesn't happen. It's one of those things that everyone knows is *supposed* to happen and most people know doesn't *really* happen.

      Also security is not related to functionality. However the concerns are likely to be along the line of "does it work". Rather than considering the question of "is it secure?"

    7. Re:Two counterpoints by Computer! · · Score: 2

      It just doesn't happen.

      Even given that, what percent of code is reviewed at some point before shipment? Not necessarily line-by-line, in a systematic and documented fashion, but every now-and-again, to fix a bug or add a feature? I would say well over 95%, in my experience. For this article to even be plausable, a rogue programmer would have to plant the bad code, then hope no one ever sees it again. If anyone does, they run a "diff" in Source Safe, and guess who checked it in last? Considering that something like that could be considered treason, and therefore result in the death penalty, who is going to try that? Even suicide bombers want to be certain that their terrorism will at least work.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    8. Re:Two counterpoints by HiThere · · Score: 2

      It doesn't sound like you're a programmer. It isn't uncommon for it to take longer to understand code than to create it in the first place (at least then you know what you're trying to do). What a piece of code does isn't obvious, or at least it often isn't. And that's assuming that nobody is playing games with assembler, or self-modifying code. But Win95, at least, claimed to have implemented genetic algorithms. So self modifying code can be assumed. And at that point, trying to figure out what is being done can get ... interesting.

      Perhaps with Win XP that simplified some of the proceedures, and stripped that out. But I didn't see any such thing announced, and if I had, I don't know whether or not I would believe it. (The PR department and the tech department seem to frequently not be on speaking terms.)
      .

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    9. Re:Two counterpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Considering that something like that could be considered treason, and therefore result in the death penalty, who is going to try that?"

      Treason? You're joking, right?

    10. Re:Two counterpoints by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Nitpick: Sabotaging a companies product isn't treason, even by todays loose standards. Unless it's being produced under federal contract, and even then (I think) it has to be for military/national defense purposes.

    11. Re:Two counterpoints by Computer! · · Score: 2

      Nope. IANAL, but sabotaging a software product in order to gain entry into government or corporate systems to gain information in time of war is espionage. Espionage, especially when it is commited on behalf of the enemy in wartime, is treason. Given the current political climate, I wouldn't want to be accused of treason, even if you think it's a joke.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    12. Re:Two counterpoints by Computer! · · Score: 2

      Sabotaging a companies product isn't treason, even by todays loose standards.

      Yeah, and neither is opening a cardboard box. I still wouldn't bring a boxcutter on a plane if I were you.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    13. Re:Two counterpoints by nexthec · · Score: 1

      then I wont do any sabotaging while flying on an airplane, wtf?

    14. Re:Two counterpoints by Computer! · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, please restate the question. I'm not sure what you mean.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    15. Re:Two counterpoints by obdulio · · Score: 1
      I don't think it's true. The confession (and probably the interrogatory) are like the ones in "The Name of the Rose", when Remmigio breaks pressure and confess everything that the inquisitors want him to confess and more : "I will confess to have killed our Lord Jesus if you want me to".


      2 points in the article strike me:


      Terrorist organizations like Al Queda (or however you spell it) are based in independent cells. No one knows about what other people is doing and nobody about what they are doing or what they did. If someone tries to impress his friends by telling about his activities, he would be silenced. Given that, this guy had no means to know about the plot.


      Also he said that he was going to participate in an attack in London. But the attackers did not know what they were going to do until minutes before going into the plane (according to the last Bin Laden's video). So how did he know what he was going to do?


      He is inventing the whole story out of hate, anger, fear, whatever passes for the head of someone who is being interrogated under pressure. (I dont mean to offend the folks from India, brutality with criminals is common in many places, even here, in Brazil).

      --
      PENAROL: Seras eterno como el tiempo y floreceras en cada primavera.
    16. Re:Two counterpoints by nexthec · · Score: 1

      OK

      The first poster said:
      Sabotaging a companies product isn't treason, even by todays loose standards.


      You replied:
      Yeah, and neither is opening a cardboard box. I still wouldn't bring a boxcutter on a plane if I were you.


      I said:
      then I wont do any sabotaging while flying on an airplane, wtf?


      Implying that bringing a boxcutter on an airplane, makes it no more a fellony to posses one on the ground, and that your statement was completely pointless when compared to the eralier statment.

    17. Re:Two counterpoints by Computer! · · Score: 2

      What I meant was that things that are normally not a big deal become one quickly when done in the name of a group that blew up the World Trade Center and killed thousands while we are in a war with that same group. When one of these "saboteurs" (assuming the article isn't BS) is on the stand, accused of an act of war against his own country, how will he defend himself? By claiming the whole thing was a harmless joke? Doubtful. IANAL, but it won't be hard to read electronic terrorism into something like this, and that's treason.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    18. Re:Two counterpoints by Suicyco · · Score: 1

      More likely it would be "Hey, here's how you can make 250,000 dollars!" People are easily pursuaded by money.

  150. OT: strcmp by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Offtopic, but:

    another reason why strcmp() is pure evil sometimes

    Only because people try to misuse it as a boolean function, which it ain't - its an order test. If you say

    if (strcmp(username, "osama") == 0) or
    if (strcmp(username, "oscama") != 0)

    your code will be clearer - the == 0 or != 0 (or > 0 or < 0) is the same sense as the string comparison.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  151. Windows 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm sure they do it, but a few minutes using any of their products will show you how well they do it"

    No doubt, they do a great great job.

    Want proof? Look at any open-source software. 90% of them are nothing more than second rate imitations of what MS has done.

    I've used Win2K everyday in a heavy production environment for close to two years now. I can count with one hand the number of unexpected crashes and freezes I've had.

    Time to get over it and move on, buddy. :)

    The idea that MS releases shabby software is a myth that needs to die.

    Apple released software (iTunes) that destroyed data! It actually deleted files!

    1. Re:Windows 2000 by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      The idea that MS releases shabby software is a myth that needs to die.

      I'm sure it will when they stop doing it.

      Apple released software (iTunes) that destroyed data! It actually deleted files!

      Like Outlook Express you mean?

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    2. Re:Windows 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Like Outlook Express you mean?"

      Please site a reference to a case where Outlook Express deleted a entire hard drive due to a bug.

      And please spare us the virus/worm refs because as we have painfully learned, even the nix's are vulnerable.

    3. Re:Windows 2000 by ethereal · · Score: 1

      I think you're selling Outlook Express a little short there - it also helped your coworkers delete their files too. Let's hear it for freedom to innovate!

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    4. Re:Windows 2000 by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      bleh, I can count the times my linux lappy has crashed in one finger. And this is in a year of heavy use.

      I need to take off my shoes to count the times windows ME has frozen without warning in the last day.

    5. Re:Windows 2000 by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      And please spare us the virus/worm refs because as we have painfully learned, even the nix's are vulnerable.

      Well, my mailer has never caught a virus. You need to compare apples with apples. Working mailers don't get viruses and working OSs don't allow virus infected applications to undermine the entire system. M$ fails on both counts independently.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    6. Re:Windows 2000 by geekopus · · Score: 1

      The poster used Win2K for his example. I've had experience with both, and there is simply no comparison between WinME and Win2K. I wouldn't trust ME to surf the web, let alone try anything productive. Windows 2000 OTOH, has been rock solid for me from day one. Any problems that I have had have been driver related, and in most cases it simply locked the GUI. I could telnet into the box and restart the machine, start safe mode, and remove the offending driver.

      If you're still using ME, and you have to have an MS OS around, I recommend Win2K or XP. They're both excellent.

  152. holy cow, I found it! by The+Pim · · Score: 4, Funny
    On a hunch, I started grep'ing through XP, and stumbled across the backdoor password:

    !seineew era snaitsirhC dna sweJ
    --

    The evaluation of an action as 'practical' . . . depends on what it is that one wishes to practice.
  153. They're NOT bugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They're features.

  154. What a crock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As if Microsoft's programmers needed any help planting trojans, backdoors, and bugs in their own software.

    Coals to Newcastle, if you ask me...

  155. yes, worry. by Erris · · Score: 3, Funny
    Don't forget the ones there by design. You know, like the remote kill switch for too many hardware modifications, and others to make sure you don't rip M$ off. Ha ha ha. If M$ can do it, you can be sure others will figure it out and be doing it.

    Also, don't forget the ones that are there by poor implimentation. You know, like sound files in email that get executed without warning.

    Also, don't forget the ones that are there due to poor design. You know, like an email client that runs as root because there are no real user accounts and the underlying file system will not support that and ....

    Don't forget to combine all of the above with poor judgement. Well, running M$ with anything but in single user non networked air gap protected mode is poor judgement. Worse judgement is attatching a camera and an always on high speed internet connection in your freaking bedroom, ha-ha(banned in Saudi Arabia).

    Alah-Akbar. It's true you know.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  156. Irresponsible reporting? by telbij · · Score: 1

    Aside from the improbabilities of such a claim, it strikes me that this is pretty irresponsible reporting.

    When journalists hear about these stories, they should ask themselves: a) Is there any reason why the public needs to know this? b) Will any harm be done by publishing this?

    I can not think of a better way to play into the terrorists hands then print these trivialities. Yes, Microsoft should have been informed of this, but what does the public at large care?

    As much as I would like to see fewer Windows users, I don't see this is a legitimate means to that end, and I can't see any other outcomes from printing this story.

  157. Saddam & Playstations by lwagner · · Score: 2
    >Reminds me of when Saddam Insane bought all those PS2s.

    I'll bet he kicks ass on Half-Life.

  158. A twist on a tired phrase by SoftwareTechie · · Score: 1

    All your US are belong to Base.

    --
    Political Correctness is doubleplusungood.
    1. Re:A twist on a tired phrase by microsquash · · Score: 0

      All your Qaeda are belong to us.

  159. Animal Farm is coming true by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    Snowball did it!

    Four legs good! Two legs baaaaad!!!

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  160. What's next? You guessed it... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hacking will become synonymous with terrorism (MS was already hoping it would be), and before long will be prosecuted as such.

    It's a good thing Skylarov got out of the country when he did. With Bin Laden nowhere to be found in Tora Bora, the hawks have GOT to be hungry for whatever scapegoats they can get their hands on.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  161. What non-Windows users are thinking... by gmaestro · · Score: 1
    Trojans and trapdoors and bugs, Oh My!

    Trojans and trapdoors and bugs, Oh My!

    Trojans and trapdoors and bugs, Oh My!


    -or-


    SHOW ME THE BUGGIES!!!!!!!!!!!

  162. Doesn't work this way by WildBeast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Al Qaeda members aren't supposed to know what the other members are doing. Their own mission is revealed to them at the last moment.

    In the article they mention the following : "authorities find some of his claims inconsistent and "too theatrical to believe.""

    This guy is probably not even a member of Al Qaeda, he's just a crazy guy who's probably too dumb to even be a terrorist.

    1. Re:Doesn't work this way by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      This guy is probably not even a member of Al Qaeda

      If you read the article, you'd see they have some proof of his membership in al Qaeda. For example, he told them al Qaeda would soon hit the Indian parliament, and a couple days later terrorists attacked that parliament with guns and grenades.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    2. Re:Doesn't work this way by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 3, Interesting

      WildBeast wrote:

      > Al Qaeda members aren't supposed to know what the other members
      > are doing. Their own mission is revealed to them at the last moment.

      That is exactly right. Bin Laden himself said that none of the 9/11 groups (except the leader) knew the others existed or what they were doing. They didn't know what they themselves were doing until they were getting on the plane.

      > This guy is probably not even a member of Al Qaeda, he's just a crazy
      > guy who's probably too dumb to even be a terrorist.

      Oh, he's a terrorist alright, and if Walker is saying what he has been reported to say (attack yesterday), then he is one too. When one of these people have been captured and can do nothing else to support their cause, they use their mouths in one last terrorist attack: spreading wild (but at least remotely believable) rumors to terrify their enemies. After all, the real business of terrorists is not high body counts, but *TERROR*.

      Afroze's claims are false, but Microsoft's all consuming greed was leading them to engage in terror marketing (those "buy more or be audited" postcards) prior to 9/11. Greed, terror, and cruelty are all three heads of one terrible monster.

      Wisdom overcomes greed.
      Courage sends terror running.
      Compassion, the greatest power, conquers cruelty.

      Mothra, you were right! Heart can reach!

  163. Cave Dwellers Hack XP? by cpuenvy · · Score: 1

    Sure. Whoever thought of this is full of crap. You cannot convince me that a bunch of cave men hacked into XP. We are talking about a bunch of people who do not clean themselves, use electricity, and fight battles for the same reasons we did MORE THAN 1 THOUSAND YEARS AGO!!! Give me a break. Next thing you know, they are going to crack the gene code, and move on to settle mars.

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

    1. Re:Cave Dwellers Hack XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Surely you're not referring to "cave men" like Mohammed Atta (terrorist who piloted Flight 11 into the first tower) because he was a model student at Hamburg's Technical University, was fluent in several languages, and who also was trained at one of the USA's most prestigious flight schools.

    2. Re:Cave Dwellers Hack XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely he is, as it is well known that you can teach a monkey to drive a car, and the human brain is capable of learning languages, the same part of the brain that is responsible for language recognition was also present in cave persons. These people, and there is no argument here, are clearly a bit behind in evolution. Arabs in the Middle East would still be living a nomadic life if we did not show them that they can sell oil and make enormous amounts of money. These people here are STILL living atleast 1000 years behind us. A bunch of pigs, if you ask me.

  164. Test protocols for trojans? by Mr.+Fred+Smoothie · · Score: 1
    the chance that they would be able to intentionally slip in a trojan horse without it being caught in testing are pretty low.
    What software company did you work at where there was a test protocol in place to test for trojan horses? What was the protocol? Did they feed the program every possible combination of random input to see if it produced strange behavior (rather than just testing one or two instances of invalid input to see if an error was generated and/or handled gracefully)? Did someone have a list of all possible code-words a terrorist might use as input to a routine which did something seemingly innocuous like opening a temporary file for reading, while running with heightened permissions?
    --

  165. ROFL by michael_cain · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry (maybe), but the mental images conjured up by this line

    a member or members of Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda network, posing as computer programmers, were able to gain employment at Microsoft
    of a terrorist non-programmer attempting to bluff his way through a code review are hilarious. I would love to see what the Monty Python crew could do with this as the basis for a skit...
  166. Bill Gates holds press release on Al Qaeda hacks by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Funny
    This just in:

    "Bill Gates holds press release on Al Qaeda hacks in Windows XP."
    Redmond- Bill Gates today held a press release to confirm the presence of "hacked" code in the Windows XP product, and admitted for the first time that all previous versions of Windows also had "hacked" code inserted maliciously by covert Al Qaeda operatives within the Microsoft Corporation. "We have confirmed the presence of this code in all versions of Microsoft Windows from 3.0 to XP. The code we have found was planted by covert Al Qaeda operatives who were employed by Microsoft for years. This was a long-term terrorist operation planned years in advance and executed with frightening efficiency. We have investigated the code and found it to be the cause of instability in Windows products. As a matter of fact, the infamous "Blue Screen of Death" was in fact an Al Qaeda trojan. We will be release a full list in the coming week of all the Windows problems that the Al Qaeda terrorists are responsible for after a full investigation of all the things that make Windows suck."

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  167. It's a shitty little volkswagon car by MicroBerto · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft tries to dismiss THESE as features, then we really have something to be worried about!

    --
    Berto
  168. The Washington Post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now there's a bastion of quality journalism. Just like Slashdot.

    Taco, are you really this much of an anti-Microsoft zealot? Use the brains you have in your head, will you? Your frontal lobes are practically atrophied.

  169. There's a dead giveaway in the article itself... by biglig2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... where this looney says they planned to attack the Houses of Parliament and Tower Bridge.

    Parliament perhaps, but not Tower Bridge. If they were interested in tourist attractions in the US, they would have put a plane into the statue of Liberty. It doesn't fit their pattern. Tower Bridge isn't even that big a deal as a symbol of the City. The Tower itself, or St Pauls, or Buck Huse, would be more likely.

    Canary Wharf, I could believe.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  170. It's True! by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2

    I got a BSOD the other day and managed to scrawl this down before rebooting my hung box:

    Infidel! Illegal operation (under Islamic Law) performed in shariah32.dll: 0xDEADBEEF. Press any key to bring about the wrath of Allah, or press ctrl + alt + del to kill the infidel process. Don't forget to kill Christians and Jews daily.
    I thought it was a prank at first, or some weird virus. Also I remember a story a few days ago on /. about XP clustering (couldn't find it, though). Maybe al-Qaeda is using all XP customers to form a giant cluster to plan the next attack, or calculate the 1st day of Ramadan in the year 207348598145, or something...
    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
  171. DoJ reverses course by igaborf · · Score: 1

    In late-breaking developments, the U.S. Department of Justice now wants the Microsoft anti-trust proceedings moved from the Federal Court to a military tribunal.

  172. Bah & Feh Sir Taco! This is no hoax! by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1
    ...and I have your proof right here:

    "According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous
    processes in place during the development of Windows
    to ensure the security and integrity of source code.

  173. easier than everyone is recognizing.. by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    I fully agree with you when you say 'something more subtle in the logic could easily get through'.

    While this person is likely a loon (the article does mention his dad's lawyer's request for a psychiatric evaluation of the suspect), I have to agree with the notion that a malicious programmer at a software company could prove incredibly dangerous to the security of their products.

    While it is very unlikely that a code saboteur would go unnoticed for long, a person working intimately with a product like WinXP could gain knowledge of its internal weaknesses and take advantage of their existence without adding a single line of code that could be traced back to them.

    This person wouldn't even need to be a programmer. A QA engineer, a support engineer, or whoever. As a support engineer for my company's software, I've had customers point out security defects that I could have sat on instead of reporting to engineering. The people in QA know how a product works better than many of the people who code the thing. Often they may be aware of security flaws that engineering has chosen to put on the back burner because a fix would require a significant change of architecture.

    Perhaps this observation could be construed as an argument for Open Source. Actually, I'd like to just see companies strive to keep their employees happy.
  174. Ya Ya Ya ... by TheViffer · · Score: 1

    And I developed the internet, gave Linus the inspiration he needed to develop the Linux kernel, and founded IBM, HP, Sun, SGI, etc, etc, etc. MS is not my doing .. I think Al Gore did that one.

    I *believe* the story is "true" about the apparently confused person they caught *stating* these things, but that is all they are .. wild rantings from someone who wants to get there name in the paper.

    Unless this is Bin Laden himself or something :-P

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  175. Woohoo! by Feanturi · · Score: 1

    This means that Microsoft has been harbouring terrorists. George W therefore has permission to bomb Redmond!

  176. Douglas aadams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has it right. Apparently Microsoft can find INTENTIONAL security problems, but can't find UNINTENTIONAL security problems ... like learning to fly, you have to not try to do it on purpose... I suppose a suitably mentally trained terrorist could insert the security loopholes as long as he didn't realize he was doing it.

  177. Interesting article, but... by Phleg · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler said Afroze's claims about the company were 'bizarre and unsubstantiated and should be treated skeptically.'" I can see it now: "Those are completely wild allegations! That was a Microsoft idea, not an al Qaida one! "According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code." ...most of which involve asking programmers, "Are you SURE there aren't any bugs?"

    --
    No comment.
  178. al whatever by dazdaz · · Score: 0

    Who cares, XP does'nt work anyway so no one uses it.

  179. Was the confession coerced? by sdxxx · · Score: 1

    Maybe the interrogators exacted the confession with physical force. People will often make up whatever they think the interrogator wants to hear when they are tortured.

  180. moderator = major gayness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck would you waste a moderator point on this post? And why are you such a coward that you use "overrated" so nobody can metamoderate you down for being such a tool? You really should die. I mean, really. Eat some rat poison or something.

  181. It's True by Merry_B.Buck · · Score: 1

    The story must be true, because I found a bug in XP.

    Based on my observations, Mr. Afroze seems to have worked on the Win 95/98/2000, Outlook, SQL Server, Office, VB Studio, and .Net projects, too.

  182. "Coup de gras"...? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    What do geese have to do with terrorism?

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:"Coup de gras"...? by vaxer · · Score: 2
      1. Fabio was injured by a kamikaze goose. Worthy target, but clearly they've got a predilection for suicide-assassination missions.
      2. Gras doesn't mean "goose"; it means "fat", as in Mardi Gras (Fat Tuesday). Foie gras means fatty liver. Nice try, though.
    2. Re:"Coup de gras"...? by Fabb · · Score: 2, Informative

      The poster surely meant 'coup de grâce' which is French for 'grace blow'.

    3. Re:"Coup de gras"...? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Thanks, it was a guess... I always assumed foie gras meant "goose liver".

      Oh well. I only took one year of high school French.

      As my friend used to say, "C'est la vie, C'est la vionne" (spelling?)

      translation: That's life, that's meat.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:"Coup de gras"...? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      C'est la vie, c'est la viande.

  183. Anyone read "Format C:"? by ManInACan · · Score: 1

    A couple years ago a book came out called "Format C:". It was a pretty good book if I recall - and it had some strange parallels to this and other things relating to XP...

  184. And Linux??? by GeekDork · · Score: 1

    Even worse: Al Quaeda members might have worked on Linux helping to make it better and more stable. Who cares for one more security hole in Micro$oft products? But I bet it would hit every americans' pride to even think of it.

    --

    Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

  185. Ah... by ZoneGray · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ahhh, it all makes sense now. No matter how hard I tried, I could never land properly in MS Flight Simulator.

    1. Re:Ah... by Morocco+Mole · · Score: 1

      I never wanted to know how to land --> I just wanted to know how to steer ;)

    2. Re:Ah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never wanted to know how to land --> I just wanted to know how to steer ;)

      Moderators didn't get this?

  186. Picture by Ashcrow · · Score: 1

    If your looking for visual proof check this out ....

    http://darkfire.sourceforge.net/old-stuff/proof. jp g

  187. Blogne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one of the worst pieces of reporting I have ever seen... this is totally unsubstantiated... don't you think security professionals would have noticed something like this?

    Chris

  188. This Can't Be True by istartedi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sitting here on a Windows box right now, and the very idea that Al Qaeda could get jobs at MS, hack the s@$%%$#%#%Die American Scum@$#@$@#$ is just ludicrous. I mean, learning how to fly a plane is one thing but !Q%#@$^%@#$^#$$The blood of the infidels will run red in the streets!%@#$%%#$%$%getting a CS degree, getting hired by MS, and then slipping all those hacks through the system? That strains my credulity.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  189. Bollocks by spanky555 · · Score: 1

    These people also said the "storm of planes" will not stop, and that America is going to fall sooner than later. Now who's hiding in caves living like animals, and who's living their normal lives with hardly a hitch? The only thing these pieces of garbage were able to do was to commandeer one of OUR pieces of technology for a short duration while our guard was down. Big deal. I'm pretty tired of hearing what "geniuses" these people are - any 12-year old kid could learn how to fly a plane when you don't have to worry about taking off or landing properly. Give me a break.

    Nice try, caveman. Watch out for those daisy-cutters.

  190. Al Queda Uses XP To Intercept Intelligence by docstrange · · Score: 1

    Such as...............

    All Your Base Are Belong To Us.

    --
    Remember that you are unique, just like everybody else.
  191. Purrfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More reason to look at linux as an alternative! :)

    cus if america runs an OS that the al qaeda hacked, then the terrorists have won

  192. oh no please dont steal the XP llama's pics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what exactly would anyone want to steal from a person stupid enough to run winXP anyways. has anyone actually seen an epsisode of "tech TV" , more proof that the people using XP are too stupid to exist on their own. if our enemies stole from them it would probably be to our advantage, as the information they would get would be as half ass stupid as the people using XP.

  193. Not true by sjonke · · Score: 1

    Actually they improved XP. It wasn't hard.

    --
    --- What?
  194. Re:Taking credit for other people's havo(c)... by Havokmon · · Score: 1

    It's not me damnit!

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  195. What? MS needs help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure that Microsoft didn't need any help. The exploits were a guarantee with or without al Queda help. I'm sure that XP's unintentional exploits will be much better than anything anyone could have done purposefully. :-)

  196. XP is terrorism by the+Epopt · · Score: 1

    If we don't pass on every hoax story we see, the terrorists will have already won.

    Of course, it's better to be safe than sorry, so patriots don't let patriots use XP!

    --
    I moderate at +3, Highest Scores, and I always mod down.
    If you don't like it, vote me off the island.
  197. Breaking up Microsoft! by Proud+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    At only $27,000 each, a Daisy Cutter would be both faster and cheaper than waiting for the courts to break up Microsoft.

    --

    Even Slashdot wants to hide some things

    1. Re:Breaking up Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that include delivery?

  198. self fufilling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a perfect self fulfilling prophecy type thing. Now that someone from al Q has claimed that there are holes in XP deliberately put there by al Q, any hole that DOES show up can be claimed in the name of Osama and his cronies. Since the probability that there would be security holes in XP is high, there is a high chance of causing more doubt in the minds of consumers about this product.

  199. :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code. "

    Ha!
    Ha ha ha ha ha

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
    ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

    Boy, I needed that!
    Thanks Desler.

  200. Other things they've been up to in the past... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..include designing Florida's vote counting system, running Britain's railway system and Ministry of Agriculture, building the Tacoma narrows bridge and supplying the Titanic with lifeboats.

  201. Egad! And the other terrorists used it.... by namespan · · Score: 2

    ... to learn to fly those jets! This is the most subtle aspect of the conspiracy yet!

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  202. USA - Right, Al Qaeda - Left, & SK in the syst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA almost certainly has openings in M$. Script Kiddies doing the system and the desktop. Now, Al Qaeda might have backdoors as well. The funny part is that nobody, but nobody can really do anything because our systems are down from BSODs :). What a world. And M$ states that closed is better.

  203. MS does code reviews by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    I worked as an intern in VS.NET over the summer of 2000. I was incharge of manual and automated testing of the DataList widget in WebForms. Any automation we wrote had to go through peer reviews before it could be checked into VSS.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  204. Sounds just like by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

    the sort of bollocks you`d expect from someone being tortured by the Indian Police (Amnesty International will be able to tell you all about them), just to get them to stop.

    1. Re:Sounds just like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can fredbloggs tell me about them ?

    2. Re:Sounds just like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like an appropriate fate for an international terrorist to me.

    3. Re:Sounds just like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/aireport/ar99/asa20.h tm

    4. Re:Sounds just like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point is that at the point you are being `questioned` by the police, theres no difference between an innocent person and a terrorist. Thats what the courts are for. Otherwise you lot may as well have just stuck with lynch mobs. "Well, we caught him - what do we need to try him for, we all know he`s guilty".

  205. Where Do You Want To Jihad Today by DaSheeter · · Score: 1

    Maybe we need Open Source Osama. Then we can "fix" the bugs more easily.

  206. MS more than capable to do it on their own thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think MS has PROVEN time and time again that
    thy don't really need ANYBODY's help to plant bugs and backdoors in their products(WPA,outlook,etc etc etc)

  207. Did you know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Washington Post is an anagram of...

    Town Gasp: "No Shit!"

    1. Re:Did you know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous Coward is an anagram of...

      "Down my racoon USA."

    2. Re:Did you know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tuesday is an anagram of...

      "Yea! Dust!"

  208. Ms. Reno? by gopherdata · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that be Mr. Ashcroft now?

    1. Re:Ms. Reno? by gaudior · · Score: 1

      It's easy to get them confused. They both like women.

  209. Redundant by sled · · Score: 1

    . . . posing as computer programmers, were able to gain employment at Microsoft . . .

    Isn't that how they all get their jobs there? ;)

  210. lets get it straight by abes · · Score: 4, Funny

    They were planting features, not trojans or trapdoors.

  211. obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Obviously this is a hoax, any terrorist worth two cents would know already that Microsoft doesn't NEED any sabotage to mess up their OS.

    Of course, MS will probably stop calling every bug a 'feature' and claim its a terrorist attack - I'm surprised that, what with all the tack-ons to the antiterrorism bills being passed, MS hasn't tried to get Linux, BSD, Mac, or any other OS labelled as terrorist software.

  212. Janet Cooke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like the Post has rehired Janet Cooke.

    If you don't know who that is, do a Google search.

  213. info: i guess this is answers some questions... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1



    if this wash. post is valid. i cannot help but wonder if working for the gate couldn't considered as being part of a para miltary organization? *grin*

  214. It's funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laugh.

  215. The three stages by debolaz · · Score: 1
    Ideas like this has three stages in its life.
    • Idea is suggested, and everyone predicts it will fail.
    • Idea is implemented, and everyone predicts it will fail.
    • It fails.
    You'd think record companies would start seeing a pattern here too.
  216. *barf* by Erris · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It screams of a hoax, so let's put it on the front page. Way to be part of the problem, Taco.

    Let's just whine about it instead of moving on. Way to fill the page up with trash.

    Hypocracy, see above.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:*barf* by sehryan · · Score: 1

      then i guess you are whining about the whining? when will the cycle end. make the madness stop!

      -
      Abbreviate the World!

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    2. Re:*barf* by szcx · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Let's just whine about it instead of moving on. Way to fill the page up with trash.

      Yeah, be sure and keep that advice in mind the next time you see FUD coming from Microsoft. The only way to stop problem behavior is by pointing it out. You think the antitrust case would have been filed if people just "moved on"? Are the Slashdot editors immune from scrutiny simply because they're anti-Microsoft?

      Hypocracy, see above.

    3. Re:*barf* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dammit, do you motherfuckers *both* have to spell "hypocrisy" wrong? fuck!

      by the way, you're both assholes.

  217. SUICIDE PROGRAMMERS (lawdy, have moicy!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    help! they're dying for allah and they're taking you with them. help! help!

  218. non-humorous post by xah · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's something different in this topic: a non-humorous post. Let's try to analyze this logically. My conclusion is that the story is false.

    Al-Qaeda does have a motive to introduce bugs into Windows XP, which will be deployed widely around the world, especially in the US. Al-Qaeda's leadership has stated that their goal is the destruction of America. To the extent that the American economy relies on Microsoft products, this alleged subversion would give Al-Qaeda information, the ability to disrupt systems over remote connections, and, when revealed as true, the ability to make the world's population panic and distrust their current set of leaders.

    Al-Qaeda is known to have hatched many crazy schemes, including one involving a helium balloon that would have distributed anthrax in Washington, DC. This alleged subversion of Windows XP is crazy, but it fits with Al-Qaeda's modus operandi.

    Al-Qaeda has different kinds of people on their payroll. It is conceivable that they hired experienced computer programmers who came under the cultish influence of Bin Laden.

    Microsoft's software development proceeds not just in the US, but in other countries, too. This geographic diversity would make it easier for an Al-Qaeda operative to be hired by Microsoft.

    Even if Al-Qaeda could not get its operative hired by Microsoft, it could have slipped the code into XP through a variety of means. Some people have mentioned third-party modules.

    Another obvious choice would be to breach physical security at a Microsoft building, and insert the trojan or backdoor when no one else was around.

    They could have cracked into Microsoft's core developer sites. This could have been accomplished via cracking techniques, social engineering, or breach of physical security combined with placement of of hardware or software that allowed the access. Any of these options would have allowed them to place the trojan horse or backdoor password.

    As for Microsoft's code review process, there is little detailed public knowledge on how thorough it is. It does miss many security related bugs. No one individual can possibly look at all the XP code. Thus, the crucial part of the system is accountability, ensuring that trusted reviewers look at all the XP code. Has this been done?

    Nevertheless, the story seems too unlikely. If Al-Qaeda carried out this alleged subversion successfully, why haven't we seen more ill effects from it yet? You'd think they would have already attempted to hack into sites and cause havoc and mayhem. That hasn't happened yet.

    Nevertheless, I would hope that the security people at Microsoft are doing some double checking of the XP code.

    --
    I am not a lawyer. Do not take my words as legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney.
  219. Old news. They already did it with 95. by wackybrit · · Score: 1

    They already did it. Windows 95. That bizatch of an operating system cut US productivity in half overnight.

    I think the US military should now be focused on finding and putting the Blue Screen Of Death on trial. It's worse than Bin Laden.

  220. This is a funny post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me see if I get this right. M$ has developed for years an OS that has literally cost our country BILLIONS of $'s. They have been found guilty of all sorts of illegal activity and are knowing for being the masters of FUD. And this is irresponsible reporting because a reporter tells what one prisoner said? No, this is very legitimate reporting. It was not put forward as the gosple. The public has a right to know a number of things that many ppl seem to be forgetting about. However, I think that we have become more "communist" (what we would normally call represive regimes) than many of the so-called communist countries ever were.

    1. Re:This is a funny post. by telbij · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you have logged in?

      Anyway, no you are completely missing the point. As I tried to explain, I hate M$ as much as the next geek, but this isn't a Microsoft issue. The trivial amount of marketshare this report might cost them is not worth the fear that such reports will cause in the public.

      If by your comment about communism you mean that not reporting on this would be an act of a 'repressive regime' you are blowing it way out of proportion. Why not just set the terrorist free in Times Square with a megaphone? Free publicity for a terrorist's comments is exactly what they want, and they use it to spread lies in order to generate more fear. A lot cheaper then hijacking a plane.

      Also, what do you mean by "communist"? The government calls whatever regime it wants repressive based on whatever it wants to do. Do you really think our government is morally superior to any other government? Well, maybe a handful, but basically we do whatever the hell we want, and the government uses propaganda to make us feel better about screwing other people over. Our moral crusading in the name of 'freedom' is mostly just oil interests and political maneuvering. It's not that we're worse than any other government, but some would say the richest country in the world has some moral obligations that extend beyond those of the poorest country.

      When you say 'the public has a right to know a number of things that many ppl seem to be forgetting about', what are you referring to? I don't see it as a matter of rights. It's easy to say we have a right to know x, y and z, but what about information we have a right NOT to know? If printing something is going to make people needlessly scared, and perhaps damage the economy as a result, then I would say we have a right NOT to hear that information, much as I should have the right NOT to have explicit pornography mailed to my inbox.

      Your idealistic concept of rights sounds awfully righteous for the reality of the situation. What's the benefit of knowing this to you?

  221. Stupid American Dictionary by jeff67 · · Score: 1
    I went to a major (US) online dictionary to look up "bint".
    Main Entry: bint
    Pronunciation: 'bint
    Function: noun
    Etymology: Arabic, girl, daughter
    Date: 1855
    British : GIRL, WOMAN

    Stupid thing didn't even give a negative connotation!

    And by the way, what the hell is hellis?
  222. THis explains the whole thing!!! by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2, Funny

    THey obviously used the excel easter egg flight simulator to train the hijakers!!!

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  223. Al Qaeda Tactic? by istartedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps these guys have been instructed that if they feel the need to "spill the beans" they should spill 3 or 4 phony beans along with the real ones. That way, our security has to track multiple potential threats. I'm sure nothing would please them more than to see us spend the time and money required to audit all of the Windows code.

    Perhaps there is a rational way to tell which threats are real; some kind of "threat profiling".

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Al Qaeda Tactic? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      umm, yeah.

      nobody tells the "truth" when spilling the beans, only lies which have been set up to be verifiable. (think of all the "truths" you tell your girlfiend/boyfriend...)

    2. Re:Al Qaeda Tactic? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      And suspecting MS code of containing backdoors and loopholes isn't rational?

      I'm sure that if the MS code were examined one would find sufficient backdoors and loopholes to "prove the truth" of his words. Now as to how they got there...
      .

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  224. Re:Two counterpoints take two by Already.there · · Score: 3, Informative
    As an employee who has worked in the OS division of Microsoft I would like to say unequivocally that this article is complete crap.

    There is no way that you could try to put a terrorist-sized hole in XP without a lot of people noticing.

    -For the months before the OS ships every line of code that is modified is examined on several levels; every bug that is found could potentially be investigated by any of dozens of people in any part of the organization...
    -There's nearly a 1/1 ratio of Test/Dev in the critical parts of the system; to do this you would have to get the developer(s) and the tester(s) responsible for that chunk of code/functionality.
    -Automated tools run by seperate groups review changes and record owners; try to sabotage something once & you won't get a second chance.
    -Automated tools run by testers review code that's not exercised by test-passes, reporting on changes so that the hole can be filled.

    This simply did not happen and it's embarrassing that this pseudo-technical forum is giving the report even a little credit. I would expect better from even the bitter/angry/biased-microsoft-haters that make up the such a vocal percentage of the slashdot crowd.

  225. Not only Al Qeada by Microbrain · · Score: 1, Funny

    From my experiences with XP, it seems like Al Qeada haven't been the only ones putting bugs in XP.
    Approximately 5835 winboxes crashed while you were reading this post. Thank you.

  226. standard M$ FUD in reverse, ha ha ha. by Erris · · Score: 2
    No sympathy has been earned.

    It's pure FUD, but the problem is reassuring easily frightened and confused non-techies that it isn't true. How do you disprove the existence of allegedly hidden code?

    How about peer review of source code and check sums for compiled code? How else do you prove the intergrity of a thing, by a billion dollar advert budget? Yeah.

    For years the softies have put out FUD about not being able to trust free software due to a lack of central control. True? Of course not. Yet it scares lots of people into a closed source surender of their rights and money. It's part of the reason they have all the piles of money they do from pushing some of the worst built, least secured software ever. They deserve to get this shoved right back at them.

    The track record justifies a lack of trust, but they can blame terrorists if they want.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  227. guy's a big shareholder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in MS too,I'm sure. Also runs not just ISP but telcos. trojaning xp would be minor stuff. they'd target the us government communications like military. besides they have pakistan as their real base while afgh just a training camp.

  228. Remember the Y2K bug fixing frenzy? by TWR · · Score: 3, Informative
    Now I don't know if XP was targeted by Al Qaeda, but a good chunk of Y2K work was outsourced to places like India, where this self-proclaimed terrorist was picked up.

    Given the long-term planning that Al Queda is known for, and their penchant for using the tools of the West against the West, I would be unsurprised if they planted people into companies doing Y2K patchwork for major financial institutions or other mission-critical systems. Most of that code was NOT code reviewed due to time constraints, and the work was done overseas by the lowest bidders. This is a recipe for disaster and was predicted as such years ago. Now that we know exactly how crazy these motherfuckers are, the warnings seem a lot more important.

    Just my paranoid guess.

    -jon

    --

    Remember Amalek.

    1. Re:Remember the Y2K bug fixing frenzy? by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      99,5 % of year 2000 work is rode review. Only a tiny little bit is patching. They would find the backdoors first and then not patch it. THis would be just as effective.

      by the way, making short year 2000 to y2k is what caused the problem in the first place.....

  229. Too late... they've stroke already... by tcc · · Score: 2
    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  230. If its in XP.... by BreakWindows · · Score: 1

    then this bug must have existed since 1998. Everyone knows there isn't any newly-written code in XP!

    1. Re:If its in XP.... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about!! they worked hard _all_ year on that colourful new start button!! give them some credit

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  231. Inserting bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... as IF microsoft needed help doing that!

  232. Which begs the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a terrorsist?

  233. Fiendish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Sabotaging" XP so that it's unstable and bug-ridden is like Al-Qaeda planting a ballplayer on the L. A. Clippers and telling him to miss a lot of shots.

    Hey, here's another...

    Al-Qaeda managed to get one of their men into an area MacDonald's where he was able to skimp on ketchup packets and overcook the fries for a whole month before he was finally discovered.

    Somehow...

    Some FIENDISH way, Al-Qaeda planted one of their men at Warner Brothers (codename: "Chris Columbus") who was able to successfully render "Harry Potter" "lifeless, pretentious, and overblown with gaudy special effects."

    The resultant disappointment left Americans bereft and emotionally haggard for a full 36 hours after opening night.

    And during those crucial 36 hours, Al-Qaeda may well have succeeded in getting operatives on TV's popular new dating show "Elimidate."

    Where will it end?! --

    Spudnuts,
    Anonymous Coward

  234. Digital Research made Microsoft DOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what my teacher said. LOL! LOL! Taliban sucks my cockhead! LOL! LOL!

  235. Bad News/Good News by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Bad News is that XP has been thoroughly hacked by Al-Quida.

    Good news is the hacks have made XP the most stable and rugged OS for M$ since DOS 6.2.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  236. Dancing Monkey Boy by szomb · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but the boy can dance like no pasty overweight man before or since! ... "Give me an E!"

    Hmm. Maybe that's it? Someone over at Redmond ought to ask Mr. Ballmer to pee in a cup...

    --
    Just because a few of us can read write and do a little math, doesn't mean we deserve to conquer the universe
    1. Re:Dancing Monkey Boy by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 2

      Hell, maybe you can just swab some of that sweat off of him at any of his pep rallies..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  237. Re:Two counterpoints take two by spudnic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what are the QA procedures for Solitaire? I'm sure that gets almost as much runtime on most office machines as the networking stack.

    I don't think they would have had to put a backdoor into the kernel for them to cause problems.
    .

    --
    load "linux",8,1
  238. Hahaha, don't work in development do you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be trivial to sneak code into almost any commerical non military project if you were a developer with code repository access.

  239. There for many years by yycs · · Score: 1

    Some would argue that these al Qaeda spies have been at Microsoft for years putting security holes in their software the whole time!!!

  240. They are evil. by Mullen · · Score: 2

    Wow, al Qaeda is evil, they worked for Microsoft!

    --
    Linux O Muerte!
  241. Re:Two counterpoints take two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You joke, but there's been real vulnerabilities in NetDDE (only known application is Hearts), and CharMap.exe Not to mention IE and WMP issues...

  242. This IS what MS PR is doing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Caus' it's possible quite fast that "some" OS makers will be made liable for the bugs in the system.

    That way MS can always charge another 4864 years jail on Oussama 8)

  243. Posing as Programmers by ptrourke · · Score: 1

    During interrogation, Afroze, 25, also claimed that a member or members of Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda network, posing as computer programmers, were able to gain employment at Microsoft and attempted to plant "trojans, trapdoors, and bugs in Windows XP," according to Ravi Visvesvaraya Prasad, a New Delhi information systems and telecommunication consultant.

    How does one pose as a computer programmer and attempt to plant trapdoors in software? I mean, if you can plant a trapdoor in a piece of software, you are ipso facto a programmer.

    1. Re:Posing as Programmers by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      They attempted to plant trap doors. Only if they succeed can they then be called a real programmer.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  244. Slashdot Purchased by the National Enquirer? by MikeDataLink · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If this is the best news stories slashdot can come up with, I'll just start reading the enqiuerer.

    PLEASE STOP POSTING CRAP!

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  245. Ploy/Lie or not..... by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    Lets be honest, I am sure the general /. opinion is that even if this didn't happen, pretty much all Micro$oft products are full of bugs/holes and vulnerable to trjons anyway.

  246. Re:not as easy as you might think - VERY EASY by mobiGeek · · Score: 3, Funny
    My standard practice is to never install a Microsoft OS until it has been "in the field" for -at least- a year

    My policy is half of that: the first half!

    --

    ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

  247. We must root out the terrorists and cut off funds by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    Every true American knows what he must do. We must all dump WinXP and go open source. Only then, when we know that every dollar goes to a good American distro like Red Hat, instead of supporting terrorist code hidden in obscurity within XP, will we be safe.

    It's time to bring in Bill G for questioning by the House Committee on UnAmerican Activities that Ashcroft has set up. We must root out al-Qaeda wherever they are. Some of us may have heard that they have successfully infiltrated their fundamentalist brethren who are in the White House. These people must be jailed immeadiately - their bibles could contain key decoding phrases for passing secret terrorist plans around, using biblical phrases. For example, John 12:16 means attack the Sears Tower.

    No expense must be spared.

    This is War!

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  248. Re:There's a dead giveaway in the article itself.. by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 2

    Canary Wharf would be a great target if it were better known. Parliament and any of the castles would be likely choices, along with MI-6. Of course the IRA has already nicked that one once.

    St. Pauls seems unlikely to me, because they've always avoided religious targets. They seem to really take aim at the flashy secular elements of western civ. Sbarro's pizza, the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, discos, etc.

    --
    if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
  249. Has anyone noticed ... by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    That Bill G looks an awful lot like Osama bin Laden when he shaves of his beard and puts on glasses?

    They even have that same rocking motion ...

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  250. GoF Patterns Considered Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about that handy Factory pattern, a great way to change the behaviour of a system at runtime.

    Consider: you have a Java application that loads a properties file in order to determine what classes to load and instantiate to accomplish a task.

    Edit the properties file, add a jar to the classpath, and boom, you can completely change the behaviour of a deployed system without ever having to go through peer reviews, and other such processes.

    All you have to do is honor interface contracts or inheritence, what you do from then on is whatever you wish.

  251. Stating the Obvious? by Ringwraith · · Score: 1

    Uh, doesn't anyone think this is just some prisoner who knows he's screwed and is just trying to say anything he can to save his ass?

    --
    -- Hobbits suck!
  252. D'uhhhhhhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Occam's Razor: The simplest answer is probably the right one.

    In the current situation, which answer is more believable

    Terrorist infiltration software industry from countries that are barely literate...

    versus...

    Incompetance caused by placing marketers in
    charge of a software company with monopolistic practices.

    PICK ONE.

  253. And this just in from Boeing security.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Latest news reports advise that a cell of 4 terrorists have been operating at the Boeing Renton site. Police advised earlier today that 3 of the 4 have been detained.
    Boeing security stated that the terrorists Bin Sleepin, Bin Drinkin and Bin Fightin have been arrested on immigration issues. The Police advise further that they can find no one fitting the description of the fourth cell member, Bin Workin, in the area. Police are confident that anyone who looks like Bin Workin will be very easy to spot in the plant.

    1. Re:And this just in from Boeing security.... by talks_to_birds · · Score: 2
      Yeah..

      Bin Workin would stand right out at the Lazy B...

      t_t_b

      --
      I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
    2. Re:And this just in from Boeing security.... by screwtheNSA · · Score: 0

      And here I thought it was REALLY spelled: BOING Aircraft Company!

      --
      206.39.38.2, DDN-BLK-36, DOD NET INFO CENTER. 800.365.3642 206.36.0.0-206.39.255.255 NET RANGE.
  254. Remember how to spot terrorist coders by WillSeattle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ask them questions they won't know the answers to.

    Like talk about the Grey Screen of Death and see if they notice. Or see if they can tell you what TCP/IP stands for - hint - it's not Taliban Control Program/Intifada Protocol like they think.

    And if they don't get all hot and bothered by the BSD booth babes, you know they must be terrorists.

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  255. They're Everywhere! by Steve+B · · Score: 1
    members of al Qaeda may have worked for Microsoft and planted "trojans, trapdoors, and bugs in Windows XP"

    They also corrupted our politicians and dumped dihydrogen monoxide into the water supply.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  256. Looking for excuses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ObExplanation: somebody is in need of a scapegoat to take the blame for XP's security problems, instability, poor performance and design flaws.

    Sure Bill. Sure. Something wrong with Windows? Must be the terrorists. Sure. Yawn.

  257. Re:There's a dead giveaway in the article itself.. by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    Any chance we can convince them to put the EMP building in Seattle on their short list instead of the Space Needle? I wouldn't mind losing that building, and they'd be attacking Paul Allen, so they might find it more satisfying.

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  258. Here come the macs again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is run by terrorists.

    Linux? Hah - that's just totally Unamerican!

  259. haha... by Otaku+Link · · Score: 1

    Heh, first it was greed, then it was spyware, NOW it's trojans/holes in the system? Wow...you really DO eXPerience everything with XP.

  260. Even if it's not true... by bero-rh · · Score: 2

    ... it clearly shows how Open Source Software is more secure than proprietary software, contrary to Microsoft's favorite claim in defense of NT/XP servers.

    Nobody could possibly claim a terrorist organization got its patches into the official releases of Open Source tools.

    --
    This message is provided under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html
  261. Rigorous processes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, right, it's called Code Red Sircam.

  262. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know about you guys, but how the hell to you "pose" as a programmer? Either you are, or your not!

    lol

    I think next week maybe I'll pose as a surgeon or a lawyer and get a raise!

  263. And we thought they were the bad guys!! by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    Hey, maybe those islams are really about peace huh? They just like to bring peace about in violent ways!! too bad they're dead now.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  264. Bunch of Suckers by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    How can anyone just take this guy's word for it like that? Or is it that it makes some people happy to think XP has been penetrated by Al Qaeda?

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  265. Re:Two counterpoints take two by jazman_777 · · Score: 2
    There is no way that you could try to put a terrorist-sized hole in XP without a lot of people noticing.


    So, are those who install Outlook aiding and abetting Terrorism? It sure is a huge hole in the system...

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  266. Not a C64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a C64, numbnuts. Commodore made 486 PCs.

  267. Microsoft are the terrorists! by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2

    We've known for a long time that Osama bil Gates is a digital terrorist, the ring leader of the "Active Qaeda" terrorist network.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  268. Talibox? by clmensch · · Score: 1

    Sure, the article says they put holes in XP...but what if they really put holes in the XBOX?!?!

    Imagine...you boot up your xbox to play Dead or Alive. Instead of the game starting, a hypnotic image of Osama bin Laden appears telling you to buy more gasoline and heroin from his Islamic brothers.

    But of course that won't be necessary because you must already be smoking crack to have purchased an xbox.

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
  269. All wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wouldn't praise himself, he does it for Alah(?). Oh, who cares, this is /. and noone can spel anywayz.

    al-Qaeda is "The Base". Do you think it's a hint about all our base belong to them? ;)

  270. hack back at them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chmod 777 /bin/laden

  271. Bin Ladin has already won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing. Several weeks ago, when I was stating the anthrax spore dust with electorstatic treatment was from a local american group, a number of ppl riped me and basically stated it had to be from Bin Ladin. That requires a knowledge that THINK. Is it likely that this guy is knows what he is talking about? no.
    But is it possible for the Al Qaeda to slip in 1-5 ppl into Microsft and to get some backdoor into the > 100M loc without others knowing? Oh Yeah. Proof in point. The russians who were sneaking through their network for > 3 months.
    Likewise, getting a job at Microsoft and doing the mods is far easier than bombing the WTC, building Nukes, Doing Chemicals, etc.

  272. Sensationalism at its finest... by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

    This is by far the most sensational article I've read. I mean, there has been no evidence to support this other than a testimony of a guy.

    Secondly, I don't think this is any better at proving that Open Source is better than how Microsoft is doing it. Let give a generous estimate that 5 people infiltrated MS. With the system of code checking that they have at MS, it is almost impossible for these 5 people to implement something that will go unnoticed by thousands. The same thing could as likely to have happend in open source software.

    --


    _______________________________
    "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    1. Re:Sensationalism at its finest... by talks_to_birds · · Score: 2
      • "The same thing could as likely to have happend in open source software."

      Shoo, M$ troll...

      t_t_b

      --
      I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  273. Bugs, Holes, Trojans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SO I just finished reading through everyone's witty re-interpretation of the whole 'but XP already has security holes and trojans!' tripe.

    Anyone care to point out these so-called backdoors?

    Anyone?

    Uh huh.

    My roommate worked as MS over the summer, suffice to say, you little people have absolutely no idea how ignorant you sound. It's incredible.

    'While I don't think it did happen, it certainly could!'

    Right... if it helps you sleep better at night, keep thinking that.

  274. Corrected Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Amazing. Several weeks ago, when I was stating the anthrax spore dust with electrostatic treatment was from a local american group, a number of ppl riped me and basically stated it had to be from Bin Ladin. That requires a knowledge that < 1000 ppl (&& probably < 300) in the world have. Yet many here are absolutly assured that al Qaeda has enough smart ppl to pull this off. Likewise, everybody here, is assured that al Qaeda has nukes and chemicals. These require advanced degrees in Physics, Engineering, and Chemistry. Yet they do not have ~ 1 person smart enough to get into Microsoft??? I have interviewed at Microsoft for a coding job. Other than being long and boring, it was not hard. I had a job offer, but it was way too low for the area (70K for seattle - no way). Many of my fellow Americans need desperatly to pull their heads out of their ass and THINK.

    Is it likely that this guy is knows what he is talking about? no.

    But is it possible for the Al Qaeda to slip in 1-5 ppl into Microsft and to get some backdoor into the > 100M loc without others knowing? Oh Yeah.

    Proof in point. The russians who were sneaking through their network for > 3 months.
    Likewise, getting a job at Microsoft and doing the mods is far easier than bombing the WTC, building Nukes, Doing Chemicals, etc.

  275. How long? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    How long has this insider been working for Microsoft? I'd guess since Windows 1.0

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  276. MS Can Dish Out the FUD ... by Brown+Line · · Score: 1

    ... so let's see how they react when someone starting FUDding XP. My guess: it ain't gonna be pretty.

    --
    [this .sig for rent]
  277. Afroze also told investigators that the team... by mgblst · · Score: 1

    Afroze also told investigators that the team that they had replaced George Bush with a mannican, converted Disney Land into an Al Qaeda terrorist training camp, and stolen all the pokemon toys out of Corn Flakes packets. Further claims that Al Qaeda had replaced the moon with a huge goat have been treated skeptically amoung Nasa officials.

  278. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in my opinion you are both communists

    ed edwards

  279. Re:Two counterpoints take two by crucini · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That sounds reasonable. However, by that logic there should never have been any exploits for a Microsoft product, right? Maybe you are assuming that the trojan would be glaringly obvious. I would assume the opposite - that it would be the kind of vulnerability we've already seen many times in IIS and Outlook. Something that could be called an honest mistake.

    I still don't really believe the story, but I think you are dismissing it too lightly.

  280. Comments by Serpent+Mage · · Score: 1

    You must be joking. Everyone knows that microsoft code never has comments.

    1. Re:Comments by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      "You must be joking. Everyone knows that microsoft code never has comments."

      Sure it does- they all start with "FIX ME"

      graspee

  281. Hole in the argument by HiThere · · Score: 2

    I believe that early on there was a bugged version of gcc that went undetected for years. (The binary didn't match to source, but whenever it was recompiled it patched itself to still contain the bug.)

    I don't remember what the bug did. Or even, actually, whether this is folklore rather than truth, though I remember it as truth.

    Still, even if it were folklore, it seems a feasible scenario (as long as one assumes that the compiler doesn't get renamed, e.g.).
    .

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    1. Re:Hole in the argument by woggo · · Score: 2
      That wasn't gcc. That was the original UNIX C compiler. You probably want to read Reflections on Trusting Trust, Ken Thompson's Turing award lecture.

      Basically, he hacked the C compiler to allow a backdoor for him if it was compiling login. He also hacked the compiler to produce a hacked version of the compiler if it was recompiling itself.

  282. FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like fud

  283. Don't believe this!! by snake_dad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's al just FUD to cover up the Magic Lantern introduction. Really.

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  284. that's BULLsh_t by haesu · · Score: 1

    what the heck, alqaeda doesn't even have internet connectivity at their so called main headquarters in bunch of tunnels in mountains of a country who can't even make glass (afghanistan). that's some hilarious shit. remote members of alqaeda in other countries might have done it but still, that's hoax to me.

  285. what software company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my instinct is that youre probably not a progammer but a "people person"(i.e. someone who "studied" business, communications or marketing in school), but the fact that youre reading /. kinda nixes that theory. so youre probably legit, and i, and i assume the rest of the community as well, would like to know what software company you work for. any company which actually does everything you say before releasing code is #1 on my list.

  286. heh by eLudd · · Score: 1
    According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code.

    Must be the compiler that buggers it up then...

    --
    "That's a fact, in my opinion" -some peacenik on CNN
  287. I am not an expert in GA & GP, but by Mr.+Fred+Smoothie · · Score: 2
    AFAIK, GA doesn't necessarily mean "self-modifying-at-runtime" code. It can merely mean code included in the finished product was selected due to its "fitness" to some purpose, using a process where successive iterations were performed and the best candidates chosen, altered using some form of tranformation akin to "mutation" and "recombination" and used as input to the next iteration.

    I.e., while the code was being modified during the GA process, the result is the most "fit" bit across all iterations, included statically in the final program.

    For example:

    1. "I wonder what set of parameters can best be used to tune this algorithm -- A1 -- to produce more accurate results more quickly"
    2. assemble a list of sets of parameters, and some algorithm -- A2 -- which runs A1 parameterized with each set of parameters in the list, selects the 5 that worked best, records that, creates a new list of sets constructed from bits of the previous winners
    3. iterate n times
    4. use the winning set of parameters over all iterations as the parameters to A1 in codebase C1.
    --

    1. Re:I am not an expert in GA & GP, but by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that's a weak version of a genetic algorithm. And the code that it creates is still impermeable.
      .

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  288. Theyve been there a long time by Fembot · · Score: 0

    Juding from the number of serious bugs weve seen in m$ products over the years there must have been someone there for quite a long time... Or maybe lots of terrorist groups all have one person there!!!!!

  289. Malice? by Frank+Sullivan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "no evidence of malicious code in the operating system has been reported".

    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. :}

    --
    Hand me that airplane glue and I'll tell you another story.
    1. Re:Malice? by anichan · · Score: 1
      In the dark future of Hello Kitty there is only war.


      How true...

      --

      karma is for the weak >)

  290. The simplest solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't employ muslims. Ever.

    They're third-world animals anyway, and certainly don't deserve the scraps from the table of civilised man.

    Watch them cry 'racist' now.

  291. Re:Two counterpoints take two by Mr.+Fred+Smoothie · · Score: 2
    it's embarrassing that this pseudo-technical forum is giving the report even a little credit
    Well not all of us have the "benefit" of having worked at Microsoft, so you'll have to forgive us if we're ignorant as to the exact procedures used to test code there. Additionally:
    For the months before the OS ships every line of code that is modified is examined on several levels; every bug that is found could potentially be investigated by any of dozens of people in any part of the organization...
    OK. Do you have any description of this process that's more concrete than "examined on several levels?" Are all of the "any of dozens of people in any part of the organization" programmers? Is their level of debugging skill equal to or greater than the skill of the most skilled programmer producing the code? How many people investigate the bugs that aren't found? (Careful, this last one is a trick question)
    There's nearly a 1/1 ratio of Test/Dev in the critical parts of the system; to do this you would have to get the developer(s) and the tester(s) responsible for that chunk of code/functionality.
    OK, so assume *one* chunk is targeted. Does that mean they'd have to get *one* programmer/tester pair? Two? Is it inconceivable that there is a piece of the system advanced enough that there are only a couple people skilled enough to work on it? Is it conceivable that, in such a case, a *large* enough amount of money exists to corrupt those small # of individuals? What criteria are used to determine which pieces of the system are "critical?" Is browser code which allows files with spoofed content/file types to execute on the machine an example of this type of "critical code?"
    Automated tools run by seperate groups review changes and record owners; try to sabotage something once & you won't get a second chance.
    And these automated tools can distinguish between bugs and deliberate vulnerabilities, perfectly? Is the person writing the tools more skilled than the most skilled programmer writing the production code? What tests are done on the testing tools to determine that they work adequately?

    I hope you get my drift. Do I personally believe that terrorists have infiltrated Microsoft and planted bugs in the code? Not likely. Is the scenario conceivable? Absolutely.

    --

  292. With all due respect, 95% my ass by Mr.+Fred+Smoothie · · Score: 2
    Few of the companies I've worked for, as a contractor *or* an employee, have had mandatory code review as part of the "official" process. Of the one or two that did, neither had any mechanism to determine whether the code was actually reviewed, and at both of them, especially as deadlines got nearer, code reviews were frequently not done even though everyone agreed they were supposed to be.

    Is this good? NO! Is it common? In my experience, in the literature of our industry, and of the opinion of most of the programmers I personally know (which is a large sample), it is the *rule* rather than the exception, unfotunately.

    --

    1. Re:With all due respect, 95% my ass by Computer! · · Score: 2

      I wholeheartedly agree, but over any significant period of time, unless the code never has any bugs, or is never changed, it will be worked on by someone other than the programmer.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
  293. Thats an easy claim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 'real' employee's do this stuff anyway!

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/12/11/2125 22 4&mode=thread

    1. Re:Thats an easy claim... by NirishChas · · Score: 1

      "real" employees are those there to check the security of microsoft products, and not compromise them.

  294. It's all so clear! by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    This is why MSN Messenger/Passport is down again today!

  295. GNU tools by Harinath · · Score: 1

    Well, if you have GNU find and xargs, you probably have GNU grep too. In which case it is much simpler to

    grep -r

    instead, as in the original message.

    1. Re:GNU tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      +5 Deadpan for you, sir.

    2. Re:GNU tools by slamb · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I know.

      I pointed out the longer version because (A) find is much, much more flexible and (B) someone posted the incorrect find, which is dangerous. I didn't see the need to repost the original.

      Where the grep -r works, cool, you've saved some typing. But if you want to do something a bit more specific like only checking the C source and not the makefiles/documentation, pure grep doesn't work out. find+xargs+grep does:

      find linux -name '*.[ch]' -print0 | xargs -0 grep 'blah'
  296. Windows XP and so. by os2fan · · Score: 1
    Whether or not bugs were placed by terrorists does not mean that there are grave problems that we should be concerned about.

    First, reducing biodiversity, whether of wheat or windows, is a bad thing, because viruses spread quickly and do lots of damage. The simple fact is that we need redundancy in the forms of at least two different technologies.

    Secondly, when we do go one way, there is an encumbered trust to ensure that all is safe. This appears to be lacking from the MS world, since their model is to force use of their product.

    Let's face it, there is no reason why I should not be able to use any POP3 client to collect mail from Hotmail, rather than specific clients.

    Even if the current threat is a joke, there is still underlying issues that need to be address.

    I would suggest that we need to get some biodiversity, or face the rath of bugs, whether deliberate (eg malicious), exploited (eg viruses) or accidental.

    Remember: Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity.

    --
    OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
  297. I dont care.. by dizzy+tunez · · Score: 0

    becuse i`m using linux
    :)

    --
    "If you loved me, you`d all kill yourselves today"
    Spider Jerusalem
  298. Maybe it's a lie... by indigo78 · · Score: 1

    ...and it comes from Microsoft. So they can say they were under attack by terrorists and their products were sabotaged by them, instead that "buggy by nature".

    --
    I'm fat, you're ugly. I can get slimmer, and you?
  299. Serious Problem - Manufactoring by YeOldeCurmudgeon · · Score: 1
    There is the chilling possibility that should be considered, assuming widespred adoption of XP in industrial control and embedded functions, that manufactoring functions could be subverted.

    Suppose Al Qaeda could gain control over manufactoring plants by hacking into the XP controlled factory automation systems?

    Boeing airplanes could be created with hacks built in, so next time no terrorists are required on board.

    Publishing systems might be hacked resulting in the purging of all books not meeting suitability criteria!

    Microsoft Phone or CE Pocket Computers disrupt networks on command, or convey user information to a terrorist homebase.

    <TONGUE IN CHEEK>
    A butcher's freezer with embedded XP controller might refuse to keep pork frozen.
    Automated diaper machines might be hacked resulting in the a national supply of mass produced disposable Burkies!
    </TONGUE IN CHEEK>

  300. Bugs?! ... by degauss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could this just posibly be Microsoft's latest ploy to disguise all the bugs and problems that already exist in their programs?

    --


    CoyboyNeal is God
  301. Re:Two counterpoints take two by sunset · · Score: 1
    ...There is no way that you could try to put a terrorist-sized hole in XP without a lot of people noticing...

    Presumably these safeguards are primarily designed to prevent mistakes, not intentional sabotage.

    There's also the question as to how well the safeguards are actually tested. In almost any corporate/political system, procedures with have no practical consequence are very unlikely to be carried out properly.

    So while I'm inclined to consider the claim of sabotage to be bogus, to bet your ass on that would be foolish.

  302. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Battle Realms for you!

  303. Re:Two counterpoints take two by edp · · Score: 2

    "-For the months before the OS ships every line of code that is modified is examined on several levels; every bug that is found could potentially be investigated by any of dozens of people in any part of the organization..."

    That is the only one of your statements that could be likely to actually result in catching an intentional security hole, and I won't believe it at face value without supporting evidence, such as a description of the actual code review procedures. The typical code review in the industry (and I've seen other major operating system code and supposedly secure procedures in accordance with DoD standards) may be to check that the code being modified is in the area it purports to fix a bug or whatever and is by an engineer who knows that area. On occasion, a reviewing engineer may check the code to see that it changes the behavior in the way it is supposed to. Rarely would an engineer scrutinize the code to see if it subversively changed the code in a way it wasn't supposed to.

    "-There's nearly a 1/1 ratio of Test/Dev in the critical parts of the system; to do this you would have to get the developer(s) and the tester(s) responsible for that chunk of code/functionality."

    The conclusion of that statement does not follow from the first part. Only the developer needs to be an adversarial agent, because a tester is not necessarily going to catch an intentional security hole. I think it is not even likely, because a designed hole isn't going to show a lot of evidence. E.g., a buffer overrun error is an error whenever the buffer is overrun, whether by 1 byte or 1 million. A designed hole may show up only when certain data is presented, and testing would never catch such a hole. This is why I only believe your code-review claim would catch a hole, if there were a real, meaningful code review.

    "-Automated tools run by seperate groups review changes and record owners; try to sabotage something once & you won't get a second chance."

    All this means is that changes can only be made by persons assigned to work on that particular code and must be associated with a recorded bug fix or design specification. That is little impediment to adding a security hole; it just means the code implementing the hole has to be submitted to the source along with a recorded bug fix or design specification in the same area.

    "-Automated tools run by testers review code that's not exercised by test-passes, reporting on changes so that the hole can be filled."

    As above, testing will not catch a design hole.

    This doesn't mean I believe there is a terrorist-planted hole in Windows, just that I don't believe Microsoft's procedures would be likely to catch one.

  304. From the article by Fjord · · Score: 2

    "According to Desler, Microsoft has rigorous processes in place during the development of Windows to ensure the security and integrity of source code."

    Yeah, but not the security and integrity of Windows

    --
    -no broken link
  305. "Theatricality" is in the eye of the beholder by Party+Remover · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that if we'd caught a guy in August who claimed that two jet planes were going to be hijacked and used as flying bombs on the World Trade Center, our authorities might have dismissed such a claim as "too theatrical to believe." Hell, I had trouble believing it as it unfolded in front of me.

  306. this has to be the lamest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this has to be the lamest story slashdot has ever posted. even if it was posted in the washington post it should have been immediately rejected by the slashdot editors. get a life people.

  307. A funny anagram of Al Queda that is on topic here by Sonicboom · · Score: 1

    Al Qaeda is an anagram for "A QA DEAL"

    *lol*

    I'm sorry but when I was reading this I looked at Al Qaeda and realised this funny anagram and I had to post it. Maybe GATES and Osama are working on some sort of Pinky and the Brain type of scheme for world domination! *lmao*

    OK - there goes all my Karma...

    --
    [Connection closed by foreign host]
  308. Re:Two counterpoints take two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incredible. You've just proved that I've been hallucinating for years.

    You see, you're saying that no terrorist-sized hole could be possibly introduced in Windows. No chance. Security-related stuff is examined to death.

    I submit that for five years MS shipping products (95, 98) have contained a massive security hole where computers running Windows File Sharing have trusted the remote computer as to the length of the password, reducing any password to under 8 bits of strength. In a minute, any unpatched (yes, years later they found the hole) 95/98 box can be zipped into. Just for kicks, I wrote a program that extracts passwords on shares from the boxes as well. This is *exactly* where a security hole would be placed -- in the password verification code -- and yet it slipped by MS for years and years.

    All right, maybe that was a quirk. How about the fact that for *years*, 95/98 boxes would bluescreen upon trying to access the path NUL/NUL? Just about every 95/98 box running a server could be bluescreened by simply trying to access the directory NUL/NUL. Every fileserving program in the world was a sucker for that. The ability to remotely bluescreen any server.

    I suppose that was a quirk too.

    I'm not going to bother to mention all the possibilites for buffer overflows in IIS (which, being amazingly insecure, runs in Ring 0) and IE parsing code.

    I'll grant you that something along the lines of "if (strcmp(password, "bobsbackdoor") == 0) return 1;" might have been noticed. But if you don't think that someone could have smuggled in backdoors, you're crazy.

  309. It is a hoax by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    It's not in the Washington Post; I think the reference was that Newsbytes is owned by the Post. Anyway the story itself is BS; it cites articles in the Times of India, Hindustan Times, and the Guardian. I've searched all their websites, and also looked on Nexis, and there is no such story in any paper. I emailed the author of the article asking him to produce the sources.

  310. Un-frozen caveman programmer! by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

    --
    Who did what now?
  311. Stop working? by kimihia · · Score: 1

    If they are going to stop working then they need to start working before cna!

  312. Afghanistan teaches CS to students???? by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    I thought most afghans went to school to learn how to chant and rock back and forth.

    In a country with little communications infrastructure, few if any computers, and unreliable electricity distribution. How could they possibly have anyone versed well enough in CS to write code?

    The thought is funny though....

  313. Why? by Snover · · Score: 1

    Now why would anyone want to sleep will Bill Gates? He's ugly, he wears glasses, he's created an evil multi-billion dollar corporation, he--oh, yeah.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  314. Connection? by NeuroMorphus · · Score: 1

    Of all the people in the world, Bill Gates had to pick Bin Laden as his pen-pal :-\

    Let's face it, Borgs give birth to more borgs

    ~=NeuroMorphus=~

    --

    python >>>
    reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,map(lambda x:chr(ord(x)^42),tuple('zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b')))
  315. Chant heard at Al Qaeda training camp.... by reynolds_john · · Score: 2, Funny

    Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!

  316. Re:Two counterpoints take two by jsse · · Score: 2

    As an employee who has worked in the OS division of Microsoft I would like to say unequivocally that this article is complete crap.

    Just curious, have they fired the dudes who are responsible bunches of holes in IIS and Outlook?

    I meant, I'm just curious. Thanks in advance, Bill.

  317. Re:The Unforseen Consequence of Foreign Workers by Seehund · · Score: 1

    Aren't Indians as American as you can get? In the politically correct sphere I believe they're referred to as native Americans though.

    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  318. /. fact finding by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 1

    CmdrTaco: "Hmm, I need a story to whip up the /. crowd...lets see..."
    Taco opens Konqueror and heads over to google. He begins to enter search terms.

    Taco: "'Bill Gates and Goats'...heehee thats great! What!? No results?!? Hmm, Ok...'RMS eats baby'....shit, nothing."

    This continues for awhile as Taco and the gang struggle to find something to really get the /. crowd into a feeding frenzy. It's not hard, but last weeks MSIE "exploit" was damn well near a Pulitzer for Michael. "Whatever we do," says Taco, "it needs to be from a third party, outlandish, unsubstantiated, and hopefullly, as short on detail as possible, the less the better. Ambiguity is what drives those page views, boys."

    Suddenly, Taco has a brilliant thought, and races back to his hacked DreamCast. He furiously types in the phrase "Osama bin Laden hiding in Bill and Melinda Gates' guesthouse". To his joy and surprise, he nearly falls over when he sees this fine work of journalism.

    Taco posts it to the front page and watches the pirana gather for the frenzy. Looks like /. is going to live to see another day.

  319. Microsoft's PR agency is wise by musicmaster · · Score: 1

    At the moment we get every other day a new story about Al Qaeda plans. Just think up some new story and you will find yourself on the headlines of all big newspapers. The next story will probably be that Bin Laden has his men in the US Army and the CIA.

    Lets just ignore those stories until they go away!

  320. Delivery Not Included by Proud+Geek · · Score: 2

    Nope, delivery is extra. Do you think finding someone to sign for it will be a problem?

    --

    Even Slashdot wants to hide some things

  321. Think Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since this terrorist was caught in Bombay we might want to think of contracting companies from this country that operate here in the U.S. There are these type of contracting companies doing software work. They work on many contracts for major BIG corporations. Remember sofware contractors do noot just work for software companies, they work for other companies that would really suprise you who. Yes I know fiirst hand and it scares me if you new what I do for a living.