Slashdot Mirror


A Rock Moves In Space

theBrownfury writes: "The BBC is reporting here that a very large Earth collision course asteroid has been discovered. This asteroid, NT7, was first observed on July 5th and current data suggests an impact date of February 1st, 2019. NT7 is 2kms wide and on date of impact will be approaching Earth at 28km/s. An asteroid of this size is large enough to cause continent wide destruction. However astronomers are still cautious in reporting this asteroid as the orbit of NT7 has not been fully verified. Current data on NT7's orbit suggests it orbits the Sun every 837 days and travels in a tilted orbit from about the distance of Mars to just within the Earth's orbit." The BBC article's headline (and accompanying illustration) are more alarming than the story itself seems to warrant: this asteroid has been given a 0.06 on the Palermo technical scale, which means it shouldn't bump getting run over by a llama off your list of worries.

534 of 828 comments (clear)

  1. Drivers by Traxton1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    God damn llama riders! Why don't they watch where they're going.

    1. Re:Drivers by shadowlight1 · · Score: 1

      The Naked Dancing Llama has a spotless driving record so you are all safe for now.

      See him in his ferrari at: http://www.frolic.org/intro.html

    2. Re:Drivers by lboxman · · Score: 1

      And here i though you were trying to say that these asteroids were like a winmodem on a linux box.

      --
      Regexes are like cocaine. The first hit is pretty good, but afterwards you try to use them to solve all your problems.
  2. Listen to the Simpsons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lets burn down the observatory so this never happens again!

    1. Re:Listen to the Simpsons. by sgage · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Goddamit all to hell - where are my mod points! ROTFLMAO! (ASTC)

    2. Re:Listen to the Simpsons. by trump_daddy · · Score: 1

      We should either take that advise or keep studing NK7 that way we don't see the real rock that's gonna hit us.

    3. Re:Listen to the Simpsons. by superpeach · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the same episode I seem to remember Homer making some comment about the asteroid will probably just fall apart in the Earths atmosphere and be too small to cause any real damage anyway - and he was right. As the Simpsons is always true to real life, we can probably expect this one to do just that.. right? - I didnt see any mention of anything like that on the BBC page though/

    4. Re:Listen to the Simpsons. by Llanfairpwllgwyngyll · · Score: 2

      I'm just waiting for the announcement that it's actually going to land on Iraq.

      "Let the Inspectors back in.... or we'll just do fsck all and watch from a distance...." :-)

    5. Re:Listen to the Simpsons. by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2

      Most asteroids that they say will crumble in the atmosphere are about 200 meters in diameter, this one is 10x wider.

    6. Re:Listen to the Simpsons. by uberdave · · Score: 1
      I don't even know who Asimov is...

      Sad. Just Sad.

      Isaac Asimov is one of the top names in science fiction. His series of stories on robots transformed the entire genre. Before Asimov, robots were metal monsters out to kill and maim for no reason whatsoever. After Asimov, robots became tools, servants.
  3. Oh no! by Mattsson · · Score: 1

    Hysteria!!!!
    Let's evacuate the planet!
    Or maybe *put random Bruce Willis joke here...*

    --
    /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  4. Hrm by ShishCoBob · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they are just doing this so we all get worried and start to horde gas, food, and other products so the economy comes back.

    --
    http://www.maximum-cars.com - My little hobbie.
  5. Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by vkg · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You have 19 years to do something about a 2km rock headed for Washington. Go!"

    Nothing like a crisis to focus the mind, eh?

    1. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by brsmith4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lets just hope by then NASA gets its std/metric conversions correct or we're all toast.

    2. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 4, Funny
      "You have 19 years to do something about a 2km rock headed for Washington. Go!"

      16 years and 7 months.

    3. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      We have discovered advanced arithmetic, now onto geometry!

    4. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 5, Funny

      October 2018 Status Report

      We have finally decided on the location for the meeting for the committee that will determine the budget proposal for the committee to plan the catering for the blue-ribbon commission for the removal of the asteroid threat.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    5. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by whovian · · Score: 2

      I knew Microsoft's days were numbered.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    6. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by mythr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe they can just stop trying to cooperate with those silly foreign "scientists". There wouldn't be a problem with unit conversion in the first place if you silly people didn't just HAVE to have a base-10 system of measurement. I mean, really, what's the point? ;)

    7. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by EvanED · · Score: 2, Funny

      If on course, could it be labeled a terrorist?

    8. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by scumdamn · · Score: 2

      You missed "best of breed".
      It can't be blue-ribbon without best of breed.

    9. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by belloc · · Score: 1

      Actually, they were using the experimental new metric time calculations, and they didn't get quite right. Turns out the thing will be here next week.

      Belloc

      --
      I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
    10. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by lightcycler · · Score: 1

      We have finally decided on the location for the meeting for the committee that will determine the budget proposal for the committee to plan the catering for the blue-ribbon commission for the removal of the asteroid threat.

      October 2018 status report: "On the advice of scientists and engineers worldwide, the ICANN has decided to hold it's annual misrepresentative meeting on a remote south-pacific island where the world's technical community assures them they will be safe from the asteroid"

      In unrelated news, lobbying by Windows users everywhere failed to convince Microsoft to move their world headquarters to another nearby island, citing suspicion at the calculations used.

    11. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by schmink182 · · Score: 1

      Since American's declare way too many illegitimate wars these days, I proclaim that we must declare war on war.

    12. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

      Well, we're doomed then.

      In 19 years Bruce Willis will be hopelessly old.

      --
      --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    13. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by nvainio · · Score: 1

      This must be a terrorist plot of some kind.

    14. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by limos · · Score: 1

      Actually... It's July 2002, so that'd be ~16.5 years.... ;-)

    15. Re:Big boost for space tech if it is on course... by necrognome · · Score: 1

      somebody set us up the bomb!

      --


      Let's get drunk and delete production data!
  6. "Palmero Technical Scale"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What's that? hm.

    I remember at one point in the distant past whenever they used a term in an article it was unlikely anyone would have heard of, like "Palmero Technical Scale", the slashdot editors would put a little [?] box with a link to the appropriate entry on the public collaborative encyclopedia everything2. (OK, so everything2 doesn't have an entry on palmero technical scale, but i'm sure it would pretty soon after slashdot linked it :))

    Why did slashdot stop doing that? It would eliminate a lot of confused, unnecessary discussion. Did the everything2 people just ask slashdot to stop, or something, because they were sick of getting hordes of slashdotters who would start posting stuff without reading the FAQs directed to them?

    1. Re:"Palmero Technical Scale"? by k-0s · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/doc/palermo.html

      That should help a tiny bit

    2. Re:"Palmero Technical Scale"? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      You have given me something the Oracle of Google could not find, and that is an act of Power indeed..

      Like hell, that is the first result for a search on Palermo scale . :)

    3. Re:"Palmero Technical Scale"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You typoed it, there is an entry :)

      Palermo scale.

    4. Re:"Palmero Technical Scale"? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Yes, because it's Palermo, not Palmero :)

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    5. Re:"Palmero Technical Scale"? by CreatorOfSmallTruths · · Score: 1

      ehhm..

      http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1336303

    6. Re:"Palmero Technical Scale"? by iamwhatiseem · · Score: 1

      Aww Gee...you have ruined the whole scare by throwing in minor details... now my chances of getting laid more is hopeless!!

    7. Re:"Palmero Technical Scale"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oops.. wow. I feel dumb. ^_^

    8. Re:"Palmero Technical Scale"? by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think the other guy was thinking about the 'Rafael Palmero scale', which assigns baseball players a percentage based on their comparison to an arbitrary baseline. For example, Sammy Sosa is a .61 on the Palmero scale based on very detailed (ie. random) mathematical analysis of his lifetime hitting stats compared to Rafael Palmero.

    9. Re:"Palmero Technical Scale"? by lboxman · · Score: 1

      I would like to know what this asteroid rates on the torino scale mentioned in the palermo scale page.

      --
      Regexes are like cocaine. The first hit is pretty good, but afterwards you try to use them to solve all your problems.
  7. terrorist! by Cardhore · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mother nature is a terrorist! First the thunderstorms and now the asteroids! What's next? Exploding stars? scary stuff

    1. Re:terrorist! by SlugLord · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now let's capture mother nature and all her cohorts and deny them the right to an attorney and jury by her peers!

    2. Re:terrorist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      She been on Bush's hit list for years.

    3. Re:terrorist! by mdw2 · · Score: 1

      good luck finding a jury of mother nature's peers :)

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    4. Re:terrorist! by aralin · · Score: 2

      Well, GWB knew all along that Nature is stinkin' terrorist. Hence the drilling in Alaska and other parts of his program...

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  8. No time to spare... by Izanagi · · Score: 1

    Quick, buy my asteroid insurance!!! HEHE

    --
    SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
  9. Vegas Odds by hagar� · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about the chances of the Asteroid landing on a Llama? I'm taking bets!

    --
    Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
    1. Re:Vegas Odds by Moonshadow · · Score: 5, Funny

      Asteroid NT7: it really whips the llama's ass!

    2. Re:Vegas Odds by siliconinc.net · · Score: 1

      llama? It has a 0% chance of hitting one. Dont you know that natural disasters always target trailer parks? Though I suppose if the llama was in the trailer park...

    3. Re:Vegas Odds by hagar� · · Score: 2, Funny

      llama in a trailer park... oh so you HAVE met my ex wife then;-)

      --
      Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
    4. Re:Vegas Odds by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, AOL (WinAmp's parent) could file an injunction and maybe even a restraining order. (NT7 shall not venture within 1,000 miles of any corporate AOL site...)

      If that failed, I suppose we could get the guy to record "You've got asteroid."

      --
      --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  10. NT7 by cascino · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, if Win2k was NT5, and WinXP is NT6, then I suppose it's due time that the next generation NT7 makes it's "impact" on the world.

    1. Re:NT7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANAL RETENTIVE AND SAY NT 5.1 . THOSE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WHO USE LINUX.

      -thank you the managment

    2. Re:NT7 by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      And what's another word for "impact"?

    3. Re:NT7 by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

      Will there be a Service Pack available that may prevent this "impact"?

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    4. Re:NT7 by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      xp is nt5.1

      just fyi

    5. Re:NT7 by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      FYI:
      ME is Windows ver 4.9
      2000 is Windows NT 5
      XP/.NET Server is NT 5.1 Kernel
      Longhorn, i believe, will be NT6.

    6. Re:NT7 by kuiken · · Score: 1

      euhh last time i check ME was 98 based

      --

      42
    7. Re:NT7 by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      It is. But the version number is 4.9.
      It's like 2000 & 98 got together to have a kid. An inbred kid.

  11. Quick, before it's too late by knodi · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need to hurry up and send a team of foul-mouthed perverted semi-illiterate oil miners into space! And for the love of all that's holy, somebody start having sex with Liv Tyler!

    --
    Austin is more fun than Dallas.
    1. Re:Quick, before it's too late by hondo77 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And for the love of all that's holy, somebody start having sex with Liv Tyler!

      Again? Okay, if it will help save the planet. Hold my calls, I'll be back in a few days...

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    2. Re:Quick, before it's too late by friscolr · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why bother? There's really not all that much need to worry. According to the post,
      an asteroid of this size is large enough to cause continent wide destruction
      so even if the asteroid turns out to really be on a collision course, we have a 1 in 7 chance of not getting hit. I'll take those odds to Vegas any day.

      But if you really think it'll help, i'll get right on the sex bit.

    3. Re:Quick, before it's too late by G-funk · · Score: 4, Funny

      somebody start having sex with Liv Tyler!

      *Sigh* If I must...

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    4. Re:Quick, before it's too late by SectoidRandom · · Score: 2

      Oh please let it land on Vegas!

      Not for your sake, but for all of us! ;)

    5. Re:Quick, before it's too late by Sivar · · Score: 2

      Yes, of course a collision that destroys an entire continent would have no effect on the rest of the world at all.
      Regardless you're right, why bother worrying about potentially a few _billion_ people?

      I'm hoping that if it does get close, we will shatter it with nukes and a few strategic chunks will land in Redmond, WA., preferably missing Nintendo.

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    6. Re:Quick, before it's too late by guttentag · · Score: 3, Funny
      We need to hurry up and send a team of foul-mouthed perverted semi-illiterate oil miners into space!
      Why say semi-illiterate?Is there a difference between "semi-illiterate" people and "semi-literate" people? How about "slashdot readers who drill for oil?"

      Also, are we so consumed with the fossil fuel "crisis" that when a killer asteroid is found on course for earth our first reaction is, "send someone up there to find out if it's got any oil?"

    7. Re:Quick, before it's too late by pompomtom · · Score: 1

      Regardless you're right, why bother worrying about potentially a few _billion_ people?


      Sort of like the Bush administration's response to climate change....

      --

      Buckets,

      pompomtom

      "There's an exception to every rule. Except for some rules"
    8. Re:Quick, before it's too late by paranoid.android · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Geez, talk about missing the joke entirely.

    9. Re:Quick, before it's too late by nd · · Score: 3, Funny

      an asteroid of this size is large enough to cause continent wide destruction

      I hope it's Canada.

      Oh, wait....

    10. Re:Quick, before it's too late by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      I hope one chunk destroys the Space Needle. Not because I have anything against it, I just think that would be totally cool and a perfect target.

    11. Re:Quick, before it's too late by Perdo · · Score: 1

      "My computer's longest uptime is 12 hours. I've tried windows, redhat and mandrake. Windows has performed the best."

      That's a terrible reflection on you.. and BTW, your webserver is down also.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    12. Re:Quick, before it's too late by AoT · · Score: 1

      "Why bother? There's really not all that much need to worry. According to the post,
      an asteroid of this size is large enough to cause continent wide destruction
      so even if the asteroid turns out to really be on a collision course, we have a 1 in 7 chance of not getting hit. I'll take those odds to Vegas any day. But if you really think it'll help, i'll get right on the sex bit."
      i do believe you mean a 6 in 7 chance of not getting hit. 1 in 7 would be the chance of getting hit.

    13. Re:Quick, before it's too late by troemyd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why say semi-illiterate? Is there a difference between "semi-illiterate" people and "semi-literate" people?

      It depends on whether you're an optimist - one's half full, the other's half empty.

    14. Re:Quick, before it's too late by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      Why? If I had to pick a city for it to land on, I'd say LA. Vegas would be on my "please, god NO!" list.

    15. Re:Quick, before it's too late by swerdloff · · Score: 2

      For the good of mankind, I will have sex with Liv Tyler.

    16. Re:Quick, before it's too late by mother_superius · · Score: 1

      I'd say he was kidding, and you missed it.

    17. Re:Quick, before it's too late by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      I hope one chunk destroys the Space Needle. Not because I have anything against it, I just think that would be totally cool and a perfect target.

      That would be cool. If it kills a shitload of people, you'd get the added bonus of building some huger mermorial in it's place, possibly bigger than the original space needle.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    18. Re:Quick, before it's too late by Jadeus · · Score: 1

      >And for the love of all that's holy, somebody start having sex with Liv Tyler

      Work work work... At least this is overtime I can enjoy.

      --
      --- Bigger bits, softer blocks, tighter ASCII.
  12. The Sky is Falling by Faulder · · Score: 1

    Great. Does anyone else think that this sensational journalism is going hurt funding for things like this when it misses us by 5 million km?

  13. The Mayan calendar by dgreene423 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Mayan calendar ends on December 21, 2012. If 1. the projections are a bit off as far as the arrival date and 2. it does hit the Earth, I'd say this might be a good reason to end your calendar.

    1. Re:The Mayan calendar by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2

      The Mayan calendar is circular so it never really 'ends'. It's like saying that since my clock is going to 'end' tonight at midnight (well technically, 11:59:59.9999... etc) so therefore the world will end with it. However, sure enough, the clock is circular so it will just start right up again tommorow, as does the Mayan calendar.

    2. Re:The Mayan calendar by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      The Mayan calendar ends on December 21, 2012

      -1 Redundant. The Mayan civilization ended centuries ago. They just picked a date that was long enough after the end of their civilization that it wouldn't matter to them. :)

    3. Re:The Mayan calendar by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      The Mayan calendar ends on December 21, 2012. If 1. the projections are a bit off as far as the arrival date and 2. it does hit the Earth, I'd say this might be a good reason to end your calendar.

      Err...no. I mean, if we want to randomly ascribe values to the "end" of someone's calendar, we could just as easily use the Muslim calendar "ending" in 2076 or the Hebrew calendar "ending" in 2240. For that matter, my Demotivators calendar ended last year, and I haven't replaced it yet.

    4. Re:The Mayan calendar by letxa2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think it has something to do with the "in" belief that extinct civilizations somehow knew something we don't despite not having any reason to believe that other than that they were able to observe the sun, moon, and stars and draw some conclusions and build cool pyramids of heavy rock.

      Hence, if their calendar ends in 2012 that must mean something... :)

    5. Re:The Mayan calendar by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1
      The interesting thing about the Mayan calendar is that apparently, it is even more accurate than our own. They monitored both the sun and the moon to keep time, and knew the length of a year.

      If I remember correctly, the Mayas said that knowledge would build up until something happened in December 2012, and then a new age would start. They also said this had happened before.

    6. Re:The Mayan calendar by Mahonrimoriancumer · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Mayan civilization was quite advanced when it came to astronomy. In some aspects, they were as advanced as we are today. Not only did they predict numerous solar and lunar eclipses but they also knew a lot about astronomy.

      I generally agree with your comments about not believing in old civilizations knew more than we do now though.

      --
      So climate's changing. So what? It has always changed. The big news would be if it wasn't changing. - Dr. Philip Stone
    7. Re:The Mayan calendar by jeremyp · · Score: 2

      32 bit Unix time ends in 2037. Maybe Ken Thompson knew something the rest of us didn't...

      such as civilisation will be destroyed by the sudden unexplained collapse of all the World's computer systems resulting from calendar rollover.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    8. Re:The Mayan calendar by Pxtl · · Score: 2

      Well, if it was the Mayans, then we can all rest assured it will hit south america anyways. I'll just move to Edinburgh to give it a wide berth.

    9. Re:The Mayan calendar by mrogers · · Score: 2
      32 bit Unix time ends in 2037. Maybe Ken Thompson knew something the rest of us didn't...

      I think it went more like this:
      "Let's see... 16 bits buys me about 9 hours... I'll be out of the building before it crashes, but God help me if my car won't start. But 32 bits buys me 67 years! Screw it, I'll be retired by then, what can they do?"

    10. Re:The Mayan calendar by MadAhab · · Score: 1
      No, it has something to do with their having predicted the end of the world. Which is funny, because they accurately predicted solar eclipses millions of years in the future. In any event, we'd know a lot more about what the Mayans thought, except that pretty much everything they wrote was destroyed by religious zealots from Spain.

      obSig: talk about uncritical thinking. you are an idiot!

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  14. Now we know where Bill Gates came from... by Quixotic137 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Those aliens are running NT7 already!

    1. Re:Now we know where Bill Gates came from... by __aadhrk6380 · · Score: 1

      Running NT7? It will take until 2019 to hit because they will need to keep rebooting along the way!

    2. Re:Now we know where Bill Gates came from... by xtal · · Score: 2

      Be interesting if Gates thought to be forward looking enough to spend some of his untold fortunes on funding a program to look these and maybe figure out ways to do something about them. If the tech gods aren't that visionary, you can bet that government isn't going to be.

      2019! That won't happen in my term.

      --
      ..don't panic
  15. London tabloids by Picass0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Leave it to British tabloits to sensationalize a non-story. Fortunately I never see biased or inacurate stories at this site.

    1. Re:London tabloids by jimson · · Score: 1

      Sensationalist! No Doubt!! That picture makes it look like this thing is the size of the moon! I think that would cause a little more than "continent" wide destruction

    2. Re:London tabloids by Pii · · Score: 2
      That's no moon... It's a space station!

      (Sorry... It seemed apropriate, given all of the other movie references in this thread...)

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  16. See it happen! by crt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Check out the 3d view here.

    Just fast-forward to Feb-1 2019, set the center on earth, and zoom in.

    1. Re:See it happen! by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Looks to me like it misses by a few days. =]

      --
      What?
    2. Re:See it happen! by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
      According to that applet, it will cross earth orbit somewhere around Jan 28 and be somewhat like 0.083 AU [1] away from us. That's a pretty near miss, but still nothing to worry about. 12 million kilometers is quite a distance away from us.

      [1] 0.083 AU ~ 12416623 km ~ 7760389.5 miles

    3. Re:See it happen! by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2, Informative
      Can you even read? It says:

      The applet was implemented using only 2-body methods, and hence should not be used for determining accurate long-term trajectories (over several years or decades) or planetary encounter circumstances.

      (Emphasis mine)

      So it does only take into Account the Sun's and the Asteroid's Gravity for the Simulation.

      Guess it's time to look for a nice House in Iceland ... that geothermal Energy there will sure come in handy during global Winter.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    4. Re:See it happen! by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Umm, wow, we darn nearly /.'ed NASA, or is the JPL always ass end slow?

    5. Re:See it happen! by AnalogBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Near hit.

      If you nearly miss something, you've come close to missing it, therefore, you've hit it.
      If you nearly hit someone, you've come close to hitting it.

      GAAH..
      Thank you George Carlin, for making me notice that everytime someone says it.

    6. Re:See it happen! by leshert · · Score: 2


      Near hit.

      If you nearly miss something, you've come close to missing it, therefore, you've hit it.
      If you nearly hit someone, you've come close to hitting it.


      I think George would agree with me when I say, "GAAAH!" Don't take Carlin's remarks so damned seriously. For cripes' sake, it's a JOKE!

      For the grammar-impaired, it's a "near miss", not a "nearly-missed event". Near is an adjective. Therefore a "near miss" is a miss that happens to be near its target.

      Carlin is hella funny, but his jokes aren't something on which to base your life view. :-)

    7. Re:See it happen! by WowTIP · · Score: 2

      Are you the guy that thinks that you can get away with it?

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    8. Re:See it happen! by Tomcat666 · · Score: 1

      Orbit diagram page temporarily unavailable due to high server load.

      :-)

      --
      Two Worlds - One Sun [Spirit]
    9. Re:See it happen! by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      I disagree. Consider...

      If something is not quite destroyed, you could say it suffered "near-total destruction". If it were very quiet, perhaps it emits "near-inaudible noises". Someone who is not yet adult could be a "near-adult". Thus, if something didn't hit us, we may experience a "near-hit".

      However, note the hyphenation in these phrases. Let's consider what happens when you remove the hyphen...

      If a baseball player hits the ball hard, that could be a "hard hit". If a record sells very quickly, it could be an "instant hit". In the first case, we have a hit which is hard; in the second, it's a hit which is instant. Thus, can't we expect that a "near hit" would be a hit that is near (ie. close)? Since this isn't a hit at all, it can't be a "near hit".

      Thus, I vote for "near miss". (Or, if you prefer, "near-hit".)

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    10. Re:See it happen! by cotodoso · · Score: 1

      > Therefore a "near miss" is a miss that happens to be near its target.

      Actually, a "near miss" is what you call a transexual before his sex-change operation...

      cotodoso

  17. This is really good news and here is why... by matt20 · · Score: 1

    I'm sick of watching the stock market sputter and sput. We need something big and beyond our little financial myopia. We need something to unite humanity in a common cause - our survival.

    Really, best news I've heard all day!

    1. Re:This is really good news and here is why... by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Terrorism united the United States (for a mere 5 minutes). Imaging what a giant asteroid can do...

    2. Re:This is really good news and here is why... by Jester998 · · Score: 2

      Of COURSE! The STOCK MARKET. Well, shit. If a giant ball of rock is hurtling towards my planet, the *very* *first* *thing* that I'd be concerned about is the stock market. Get a grip.

    3. Re:This is really good news and here is why... by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      To be fair to terrorism, I think it united the U.S. for more than 5 minutes. I estimated it to be about 1-3 months, depending on where you live.

    4. Re:This is really good news and here is why... by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      The ironic thing is there would probably still be environmental wackos complaining and worried about global warming despite the fact that a rock was going to evaporate an ocean or a continent anyway...

      On the other hand, I think the rest of the world would be very interested once they found out which continent was going to get it--that way they'd know who to large outrageous "immigrant visas" to. :) "Oh, you want to move away from North America? $20,000. Too much? Well, just stay there then." :)

    5. Re:This is really good news and here is why... by gmuslera · · Score: 1
      • Our problems suddently will be gone
      • No more email viruses
      • Finally all spammers will die
      • A lot of fans of the Asteroids game will heve their chance to do it in the real life
      • All questions about life after death will be answered
      • Stock market will stop dropping
    6. Re:This is really good news and here is why... by doughmein_dot_net · · Score: 1

      My response is

      <A HREF="http://www.angryflower.com/astero.gif">th is image
      </A>...
      <P>

      Okay, so the date is wrong, but the point remains. Nice dream though.

      --
      Super ninja monkeys will one day rule the world!
  18. Should be divertable by dspeyer · · Score: 1

    Obviously we need to check the orbit before we conclude anything, but with this much time to spare we should be able to push it away from us. Even a miniscule change in angle would become a massive change in actual location by the time it came near us, and we only need about 4000 miles. While they don't give an exact number, it will have to travel well over 100 million to reach us.

    Probably our best bet (if it is a risk) would be to land an unmanned craft on it the next time it nears earth, then have it burrow it's head into the ground and fire a rocket. It could do lots of scientific tests while it was there, of course. There should be no need for exotica like nuclear bombs.

    So, as they said, we have more to fear from llamas (though exploiting irrational fear of the asteroid could get us some interesting scientific data).

    1. Re:Should be divertable by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      I would like to put our rotting stock pile of nukes to good use finally. In fact, it would be beneficial if all countries launch all of their nukes at the same time to obliterate this mofo. Kill two birds with one stone: 1) giant asteroid 2) nuclear weapons. Sounds idealistic, but it'd be cool.

    2. Re:Should be divertable by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 2

      What about the alien passerbys? Do you think it is fair to them?

    3. Re:Should be divertable by geekoid · · Score: 2

      actually, the best way to handle this is to send up a probe with a nuke, then just explode it about 50 meters to one side. The heat coming off the asteroid from the blast will push it to a new course.

      OTOH
      date 2004
      In todays news, the nuclear device set near the Doom asteroid successfully changed its course, it will be here tuesday.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Should be divertable by dhammabum · · Score: 1
      with this much time to spare we should be able to push it away from us

      Nah, you don't need to do any of that. The guy says "additional observations in coming weeks will almost certainly, we hope, eliminate the current threat".

      Pens may be mightier than the sword, but those observations are even better than rockets!

      --
      I am not a robot. I am a unicorn.
    5. Re:Should be divertable by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Sure, let's pull it into an L or Trojan position. It's coming this close, let's grab it and use all that stuff.

      Actually, if it is made of stuff different than the Moon, let's drop it on the Moon. The Moon's orbit is decaying anyway, so we can give it a little boost...and create a rich mining area before the Moon gets occupied. How rich? A single metallic asteroid has more metals than we can reach in the Earth's crust.

      Maybe when we capture the next asteroid we'll have enough stuff in space to be more confident in our handling of it. And a lot of that stuff in space may be made of this first rock.

    6. Re:Should be divertable by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Personally I have long held the belief that we should try and capture a Near Earth Asteroid. Nudge it a bit here and there and dump it in a high Earth orbit. Between the resources to be had, and the enormous amount of scientific study that could be done, it'd be worth the trouble.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    7. Re:Should be divertable by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

      That would be unadvisable. Depending upon the mass and orbital distance, it could wreak havoc on the Earth's tides along with the possibility of changing it's orbit.

      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
  19. Remember by Have+Blue · · Score: 5, Informative

    The most important words in the article (well maybe they weren't actually there, but I paraphrase): More data needed. There is still a huge margin of error in the calculation of the asteroid's orbit. It just might hit Earth at this point.

    1. Re:Remember by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      The most important words in the article (well maybe they weren't actually there, but I paraphrase): More data needed. There is still a huge margin of error in the calculation of the asteroid's orbit. It just might hit Earth at this point.

      This is the whole point of the Palermo scale...it takes into account probability of of imact as well as time until impact. As the impact date gets closer and closer, astronomers will be more able to accurately predict the probability of impact. As time gets closer to the impact, the Palermo rating goes up...on the other hand, as time gets closer, a more accurate hit probability can be determined which, in all likelyhood will go down and thusly bring down the Palermo rating.

      Besides, a Palermo rating of 0.06 makes it just slightly more than likely that this rock will hit us than some other random unlikely cosmic event happening

      What's a better scale is the Torino scale, which is basically an impact threat scale, from 0 to 10, with 10 meaning a very destructive impact will happen very soon. This rock as a Torino rating of 1, so I daresay there's nothing to worry about.
      --
      "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
    2. Re:Remember by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      In regards to the Torino scale, the fact that 1 is the highest risk assesment ever given on a Torino scale to an object makes this quite concerning. On the Palermo scale anything above 0 is a sure hit, what really determines the threat is the size, that's where the Torino scale comes in better, basically a 10 on the Torino scale would likely be something big enough to knock the Earth off it's orbit! ;)

    3. Re:Remember by sharkey · · Score: 2

      There is still a huge margin of error in the calculation of the asteroid's orbit.

      Meters or feet? Or maybe both at the same time?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:Remember by Jherico · · Score: 2
      What's a better scale is the Torino scale, which is basically an impact threat scale, from 0 to 10, with 10 meaning a very destructive impact will happen very soon. This rock as a Torino rating of 1, so I daresay there's nothing to worry about

      I daresay a Torino rating of 0 is 'nothing to worry about' and 1 is 'lets keep a really close eye on this one'.

      --

      Jherico

      What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

    5. Re:Remember by Pxtl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmm. I'm surprised noone's read Niven & Pournelle's "Lucifer's Hammer". I suppose slashdotters are too busy reading Star Trek novels and watching crappy movies like Deep Throat^H^H^H^HImpact. If you're going to be a geek, read real sci-fi. Pournelles a fascist bastard, but Niven's a genius, and together the do good sht.

      The first half of Lucifer's Hammer is all about the scientists saying "It won't hit us" because they know the statistical unlikeliness of it all. Meanwhile, all the survivalists and sensationalists are getting ready. Then when the Hamner/Brown comet hits (on Hot Fudge Tuesdae, as named in the funniest part of the book) half the world is unprepared 'cause they new how sensationalist it all was.

      Its even got the required Space Mission - but they're just up there to study the damn thing, and are as surprised as everyone else when they watch it clobber the earth (and then the confused Chinese try and nuke the USSR - this was written in the 80s).

      Good book.

    6. Re:Remember by Canuckanuck · · Score: 1

      I read this book only a couple months ago and enjoyed it. It was a little slower than I was expecting. Maybe the recent Hollywood-produced films which buildup fear until the point of impact are the cause, whereas this book dwells more on what happened afterward, which is a better story anyway. It's interesting to see the fractioning of society and the loss of civilization (not to mention having to update the maps with new coastlines).

      Prior to this I read Footfall by the same authors, and now I'm reading Niven's acclaimed Ringworld. I love this scifi stuff!

    7. Re:Remember by maomoondog · · Score: 1
      Worth noting the the NASA Impact Risk Summary lists the Palermo rating at -.06, making it actually less likely that this will happen in the next 20 years than that some unpredicted background event will cause similar damage. Way to check your numbers, BBC...

      Then again, a number this close to 0 means that the chances of such an impact over the next 20 years has just about doubled with this observation...

    8. Re:Remember by Pxtl · · Score: 2

      If you like the whole "non-planet-based world" theme of Ringworld, I suggest you read Niven's The Integral Trees and the sequel, Smoke Ring - they're about a habitable zero gravity environment, and read a bit like high fantasy. Alternately, if you want more of the ringworld universe, Niven has written tons of novels in the same universe (he calls it known space - there's an anthology called "Three Books of Known Space" on the subject).

      The best of the Niven/Pournelle team-up is tied between Footfall and Mote in Gods Eye (sequel is Gripping Hand - coolest aliens ever!)

      My personal favourite of his novels is Protector - except it was written back when they thought there was a tenth planet. There's an oopsie.

      Really, I actually prefer Niven's short stories - look up N-Space and Playgrounds of the Mind for good short story anthologies of his work. The Beowulf Shaeffur stories (set in Known Space) are awesome (they're anthologized in Crashlander). Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex is a hilarious article on the reproductive inviability of Superman.

      Sorry, I'm a bit of a Niven nut in case you couldn't tell.

    9. Re: Remember by limos · · Score: 1

      Based on the information here, if it doesn't hit us, this thing's gonna be flying by awefully close. Might be quite a show!

      Surely close enough for the naked-eye at night. Maybe even during the day?

  20. run over by a llama? by friscolr · · Score: 4, Funny
    which means it shouldn't bump getting run over by a llama off your list of worries.

    well i was caught in a llama stampede when i was younger, so anyone within a 1000 mile radius of me might wanna consider moving...

    1. Re:run over by a llama? by Logos · · Score: 1

      Dude, that was an ostrich!

      --
      We are agents of the free
    2. Re:run over by a llama? by jcoy42 · · Score: 2
      i was caught in a llama stampede when i was younger, so anyone within a 1000 mile radius of me might wanna consider moving...
      Oh great- just leave us hanging.

      I hope you are planning to tell us where exactly you plan to be in 2018..
      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    3. Re:run over by a llama? by Loligo · · Score: 2

      >well i was caught in a llama stampede when i was
      >younger

      Actually, I bet you're safer than the rest of us.

      What are the odds of you getting run over by a llama TWICE?

      -l

      (credit to Garp)

    4. Re:run over by a llama? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1


      What are the odds of you getting run over by a llama TWICE?


      Statisticaly he is just as likely to get ran over by llamas again as he was to get ran over by them the first time. :p

    5. Re:run over by a llama? by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Statisticaly he is just as likely to get ran over by llamas again as he was to get ran over by them the first time.

      Yeah, but in real life, he'd be less likely, because he's learned his lesson and knows to keep his distance from the speeding llamas...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    6. Re:run over by a llama? by KILNA · · Score: 1

      A zoo visit seems unlikely since the petting areas are usually not big enough to get a stampede going, so llamas are likely a part of the individual's environment (farming them, living in their native habitat, etc). Statistically I'd say someone who has been around llamas is usually more likely to be in that situation again (I don't imagine one gets caught up in a llama stampede just anywhere).

      --
      Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
    7. Re:run over by a llama? by Pii · · Score: 2
      That's the weird thing... He was in a Sears department store at the time, looking over some nice Craftsmen tools.

      It just goes to show you, you're never really safe.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  21. Palermo scale by Wrexen · · Score: 2

    For those wondering what they're talking about, NASA has a site about it here

    1. Re:Palermo scale by grytpype · · Score: 2
      From that site:
      Actual scale values less than -2 reflect events for which there are no likely consequences, while Palermo Scale values between -2 and 0 indicate situations that merit careful monitoring. Potential impacts with positive Palermo Scale values will generally indicate situations that merit some level of concern.

      So a Palermo Scale value of 0.06 is not a total joke.

      --

      - Have a picture

    2. Re:Palermo scale by phanki · · Score: 1

      An interesting note. What I want to know now is that if Palermo scale is the one for professional astronomers then why on NT7 was it quoted at all. And there was a talk about a tilt in the asteroids orbit. The article also mentioned that the particular area in space was not looked properly and more care has to be taken looking at it now. So what does this mean ? I am not an astronomer, someone who is (or who knows about this) can help me out .

    3. Re:Palermo scale by guttentag · · Score: 2

      Can you just give it to us in plain English? All we need to know is what color Palermo 0.06 and Torino 2 translate into on the Ridgean Homeland Security Advisory Scale. Please try to be precise, no "bluish-green" or "reddish-blue" answers.

    4. Re:Palermo scale by spiro_killglance · · Score: 2

      Jesus, learn about logithrims will you.

      Log .1 = -1
      Log 1 = 0
      Log 10 = 1

      (With Logs in base 10)

      etc.

    5. Re:Palermo scale by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      Oh shit, I just watched Armageddon and Deep Impact last night, and I was pretty fugin' worried about collisions with asteroids as of yesterday. So 15% more... aw jeez, I better pack up that bunker, eh?

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    6. Re:Palermo scale by yobbo · · Score: 1, Redundant

      According to the BBC story, this is the first rock to get a positive value, so does that mean that previously we should've been less and less worried about astroids each day before it?

    7. Re:Palermo scale by multimed · · Score: 1
      Specific? Pantone 603C

      --
      Vote Quimby.
    8. Re:Palermo scale by multimed · · Score: 1
      I have to agree with that--I'm not a professional astronomer (though I am interested in science and astronomy) it really doesn't mean much to me--not because I don't understand the scale, I looked it up and understand it for the most part. But to say that this is x percent more or less likely to kill me than a random astroid doesn't make me feel any better or give me a better understanding of the risks because I don't know what the "background risk" currently is.

      I am however a firm believer in spending money to look for & track everything out there with even a remote possibility to hit us. The odds may be slim, but it only takes one.

      steve snyder

      --
      Vote Quimby.
    9. Re:Palermo scale by TheKey · · Score: 1

      I'd tell him, but he doesn't exist. :)

      --
      My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
  22. And you thought NT 3.51 was bad? by descubes · · Score: 3, Funny

    It keeps getting worse and worse. NT5 had an estimated 65000 bugs, if I recall correctly, but at a few grams per bug (when they don't fly), nobody cared about such a tiny mass. But now NT7 would be large enough for continental scale devastation? Wow. That must be a serious number of bugs.

    On the other hand, announcing a product 17 years before it hits, come on, that's not really serious, even by NT's standards.

    You think you know about programming?

    --
    -- Did you try Tao3D? http://tao3d.sourceforge.net
    1. Re:And you thought NT 3.51 was bad? by sessamoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      It keeps getting worse and worse. NT5 had an estimated 65000 bugs, if I recall correctly, but at a few grams per bug (when they don't fly), nobody cared about such a tiny mass. But now NT7 would be large enough for continental scale devastation? Wow. That must be a serious number of bugs.

      Oh, crap. Let's see:

      1) it's from Microsoft,

      2) it's got literally tons and tons of bugs.

      Obvious conclusion:

      We're all dead because it's bound to crash!

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
  23. Oh great by geekboy911 · · Score: 1

    Just wait till the local media gets ahold of this and runs with it. I can see the headlines now, "Giant Asteroid on Collision Course with Earth!" "2km Rock Headed for Earth" *sigh*

    1. Re:Oh great by geekoid · · Score: 2

      You should learn from the corporations:
      use hysteria for personal gain.

      NASA needs money or we will all die.

      NASA decides it need to launch counter measures from Mars

      we get human on another planet, finally

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Oh great by ElectricRook · · Score: 1
      Geedoid, you must be more Fungible... The proactive Corporate approach would be a merger or acqusition.

      A synergistic Win-Win situation. As this will eliminate the threat to profitability, and boost the value of stock options for the Executive Staff.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
  24. The trick is... by dethlejd · · Score: 1

    getting it to land on the right continent...

    You choose, I'm not that brave...

    - Jim

  25. You mean this NT7? by whatnotever · · Score: 5, Informative

    2002 NT7 Impact Risk

    It doesn't look so bad. -0.14 on the Palermo Scale (recently downgraded?).

    1. Re:You mean this NT7? by Ed+Hacker · · Score: 1

      I think that's Windows NT 7.0, actually.

    2. Re:You mean this NT7? by Ack_OZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      only only that, but according to the article,
      "Astronomers have given the object a rating on the so-called Palermo technical scale of threat of 0.06, making NT7 the first object to be given a positive value."

      and yet, in this article it says ""Asteroid 1950 DA is a very interesting object," said Dr. Benny Peiser, a spokesman for Spaceguard UK. It's interesting, "because it is the first Near Earth Object that scores higher than zero on the Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale.""
      (this article was dated Apr 5, 2002)

      it seems to me that the author got a bit too jumpy a little too early...

    3. Re:You mean this NT7? by qubit64 · · Score: 1

      food stuffs wont do you much good unless you pack enough in to last you the many many years it would take for the dust to settle. i'm not sure even roughly but i'd guess it's much longer than any of us will live. maybe I'm wrong.

      --
      "Save me jebus!" - Homer Simpson (btw, I'm probably talkin out of me arse)
    4. Re:You mean this NT7? by bovril · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just that that page hasn't been updated. As long as the probability of impact remains fairly constant, the Palermo Scale will rise as the event gets closer. This is how it's calculated:

      Palermo Scale = log [Probability of impact / (Yearly probability of impact * Years until event)]

      More detail here.

      --

      ---
      Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
    5. Re:You mean this NT7? by KILNA · · Score: 2

      Nah, Windows NT is much more likely to do us all in.

      --
      Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
    6. Re:You mean this NT7? by SigveK · · Score: 1
      >Maybe it's just that that page hasn't been updated

      Well, according to the page refered to the analysis is:
      "based on 102 observations spanning 13.570 days (2002-Jul-09.3768 to 2002-Jul-22.94706)"

      Well, I would say that's pretty up-to-date.

    7. Re:You mean this NT7? by JacquesPinette84 · · Score: 1

      No, it seems that the page was outdated. The page now reads -0.06 on the Palermo Scale.

    8. Re:You mean this NT7? by RedWizzard · · Score: 2

      And today it reads -0.25 (based on 113 observations spanning 15.186 days (2002-Jul-09.3768 to 2002-Jul-24.56261)).

    9. Re:You mean this NT7? by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      As long as the probability of impact remains fairly constant, the Palermo Scale will rise as the event gets closer.
      The probability of impact is not fairly constant though. It's being revised daily as more observations are made. Today (24th of July) it's down to -0.25.
  26. Hooray! by Ed+Hacker · · Score: 3, Funny

    I told my cow orkers not to worry about the unix signed 32-bit int date problem! Ha-hahahaha, I love being right! Oh, wait a minute...

    1. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I told my cow orker to just keep on orkin'. He seemed happy to oblige.

  27. a moral imperative by ryusen · · Score: 2

    I guess in about 17 years it'll be time to ask that girl if she'll sleep with me if the world was about to end...

    --

    I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    1. Re:a moral imperative by mbadolato · · Score: 5, Funny

      I guess in about 17 years it'll be time to ask that girl if she'll sleep with me if the world was about to end

      and won't *you* feel like shit if she still says no? ;-)

    2. Re:a moral imperative by ryusen · · Score: 3, Funny

      probably, but hey... like the old saying goes...
      you can't make somebody love you
      you can only stalk them and hope they panic and ive in...

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    3. Re:a moral imperative by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      All the more reason to ask many early... then if this thing is predicted to hit, the asking is already done. Might wanna tape-record them when you ask, though.

  28. It will be a close one. by md17 · · Score: 1


    "The error in our knowledge of where NT7 will be on 1 February 2019 is large, several tens of millions of kms,"

    In other news, today there was 1 in 1 X 10^43 chance that you and your anti-matter self would meet. What a close call. Please be on the look out for your anti-matter self.

  29. Why isnt the world testing deflection technology? by t0qer · · Score: 2

    I find it strange that there is almost 1/2 million geeks on slashdot, yet none of them have ever brought this up on these Near earth orbit stories.

    Has there ever been any contingouncy planning made in case something like this does happen? Or is it all being kept a secret from the general population (i.e. only 100 of those grey alien ufo's for escape)

    A company that did real work into this issue could stand to make a killing. Anyone that figured out a real nice way to make these NEO rocks bounce, blow up, deflect, time phase shift, or tractor away from the earth could pull some mass patents on that and laugh all the way to the bank.

    People used to say if man was meant to fly he would have wings. Well, if man was meant to blow up space rocks he would have nukes, and he does.

  30. If we let this news ruin the next 17 years... by Braintrust · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... then the asteroids will have won.

    --
    Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
    1. Re:If we let this news ruin the next 17 years... by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 1

      Well, I would have modded this up. Straight fell out of my chair. =)

      --

      "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  31. Not quite... by CSZeus · · Score: 1

    Yeah... except for the small fact that the economy comes to a dead halt until the idiots realize that we're not going to get hit by a giant rock (which, if they believed it in the first place, could be a very, very long time)

  32. Lemme guess... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1, Troll

    ... the asteroid is full of guys with sneaked box cutters...

  33. Hammer of God by Stiletto · · Score: 2


    Time to break out _The Hammer of God_ by Arthur Clarke. For those of you living under a rock (heh heh) it's a novel about a large rocky mass headed on a collision course with earth and the world-wide pants-shitting that ensues after it's discovered.

    Good book.

    1. Re:Hammer of God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, no, no... You mean it is time to break out Larry Niven's book "Lucifer's Hammer" (1977)... which predates Clarke's book (published in 1993) by decades. Niven's book is much better than Clarke's IMO.

    2. Re:Hammer of God by ThatTallGuy · · Score: 1
      Neglecteth thou not Footfall, also by Niven and Jerry Pournelle.

      God was knocking, and he wanted in bad.

    3. Re:Hammer of God by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Or Lucifer's Hammer, by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle. A comet instead of an asteroid, set now (well, now as of when the book was written, which was pre-Shuttle) instead of in the future.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  34. Pfew.. by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    "The error in our knowledge of where NT7 will be on 1 February 2019 is large, several tens of millions of kms."

    Earth's diameter is 6000km, so that's still a small chance I guess. Luckily. I was already turning green when I read the /. post.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:Pfew.. by undeg+chwech · · Score: 1

      Unless the error is along the orbit; It might be 10,000,000Km nearer, or 10,000,000km further along its orbit. This translates to "it's going to hit, but we don't know if it is in the morning or the afternoon. So don't make any lunch plans"

    2. Re:Pfew.. by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you may be right but you also have to remember that the earth moves 30,000 something km/s through space so if the predicted asteroid path is off by 10 million km, the earth would be well out of it's way by then.

      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
  35. from my understanding by XO · · Score: 1
    I'm not very good on the mathematical end of this, but a 0.06, from the documentation i see at this site from Nasa looks somewhat risky.
    "...while Palermo Scale values between -2 and 0 indicate situations that merit careful monitoring. Potential impacts with positive Palermo Scale values will generally indicate situations that merit some level of concern."

    "The scale compares the likelihood of the detected potential impact with the average risk posed by objects of the same size or larger over the years until the date of potential impact."
    This tells me that this is 6% more likely to occur than an object the same size and energy level blindsiding us without any sort of warning whatsoever.

    So, we think that this one has a 6% higher chance of hitting us than something that we never even get on our radars. OK. That makes sense. I think.

    I think I'm going to go and put that date into my Evolution calendar!
    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  36. Typical British understatemeNT by a+nanny+mouse · · Score: 1

    in other news, crazy british people deemed crazy.

  37. WHY ... by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    are they announcing this when the orbit hasn't been confirmed yet? I thought that after the embarrassing 1997 XF-11 false alarm, astronomers agreed to wait until they had enough data to confirm or rule out an impact, before releasing a press statement...

    --
    >;k
  38. Petition NASA! Blast it out of the way now! by mo · · Score: 4, Funny

    This dangerous situation only get's harder to deride the longer we wait. I am doing everything I can to influence NASA to start working on getting a nuclear blast to deride the course of the oncoming danger. I agree that detonating a nuclear bomb in the course of the approaching llama is a bit drastic, but I refuse to sit idly by as the approaching threat of llama collision approaches.

  39. Re:Picture by Peyna · · Score: 2

    It looked like the moon hit the north pole to me. Wouldn't that be fun? =]

    --
    What?
  40. why bother reporting by clockwise_music · · Score: 1

    Apart from making fun of the BCC, what is the point of reporting this item? Do we really care about an asteroid that's going to burn up on impact or not even go near the earth?

  41. Nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Considering the record they have established lately, I consider it highly unlikely Microsoft will be ready to ship NT 7 by the February 1 2019 date listed in the article.

    They will probably just repeat the Windows ME trick, and release "Windows CANDY" in 2019 (so that they could confuse consumers into thinking that that thing MS Marketing had been talking about so long had actually been delivered on), then release the real goods two years later. Rather than the promised 2km asteroid that ends all life on earth, "Windows CANDY" will just be a baseball-sized rock that lands in Ontario, Canada, killing a small boy's pet dog.

    So we should be safe from the asteroid until 3rd quarter 2021 at least, at which point it won't matter becuase the UNIX Date Rollover Bug will have plunged the world into anarchy and killed everyone by that time anyway.

    1. Re:Nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      And Linux may be on version 3.0 if we are lucky. Mozilla may be to version 2.

    2. Re:Nah by HiThere · · Score: 2

      No, but perhaps Linux will be to version 2.9.975 ...
      If only we could stop adding new nifty features!

      But that would be *boring*!

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  42. Sell tickets? by cirby · · Score: 2

    Get your reservations in early...

  43. Star Wars? by frinkster · · Score: 1

    I bet the defense industry is salivating at the thought of all the money about to be thrown in its direction...

  44. Okayyy... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1, Troll
    Suppose it really ends up on a collision course. Now, we can do our best to nuke it off-course at least until passes through the Roche limit.

    Now, who foots the bill? Definitely, the US is going to insist that they only pay 5% of it, as this is their percentage of the world's population.

    But the rest of the world is gonna insist that they pay relative of the percentage of their wealth (wealth that, for the most part, has been sucked from the rest of the world anyways).

    Since it's gonna take a long time to resolve this, better start ASAP bickering that...

    1. Re:Okayyy... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Right. We know this from prior experience, because the US has always refused to pay more than 5% of the total cost of every endeavor that it's been involved in.

      Be realistic. Even those who insist on calling the US names all the time generally wouldn't accuse us of being inactive. Should this happen, I would be willing to bet that the US would foot quite a bit more than their share of the bill (calculated either way that you gave above), and take charge of the operation to make sure it's completed. And when it was over, the US would say, "Yout guys all owe us one." After which everyone would go back to hating us.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Okayyy... by cebe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      oh please. The reason we call you names is because of comments like this. When Americans say things like, "ah geez.. we always have to save the world, it isnt easy being the best ya know"

      I can't even count the amount of times I have heard, "The USA is the best country in the world" on American television in the past 10 months. No doubt, written by an American who has never crossed an International border.

      Don't get me wrong.. I love the USA. I love what it stands for. I love the media I enjoy, I love the imported products I buy. But don't be so quick to say stupid shit that assumes the USA will be the only one who fixes the problem. You're talking about a country who calls NASA's Canada Arm, "the Big Arm". I'm tired of hearing shit like this. There are other competent nations too. You are not the only country that has the expertise and extra money to devote to saving the world.
      Owe you one? Bah. Go back to hating you? You arrogant fucks... you just don't get it.

      Again.. I don't mean this in as much haste as it sounds like.. I'm just really tired of hearing Americans whine that no one likes them.. then they say shit like this.
      Still, God bless the USA.

      --
      You have paid for a total of 0 pages and so far 0 have been used up (0 today).
    3. Re:Okayyy... by doorbot.com · · Score: 2

      You are not the only country that has the expertise and extra money to devote to saving the world.

      Agreed. Unfortunately, the USA is the only country that is immediately labeled as imperialistic when trying to "save the world."

      No one said it would be easy to be the world's traffic cop.

      I'd be very happy if the US could just sit back and let everyone go on the merry way, and everyone could love each other and so on and so forth. Unfortunately, there are a great deal of people in this world who have demonstrated their complete lack of ability to participate in the world community... one which they are a part of whether they like it or not. And I'm not talking about France here (<rimshot>).

      While there are many other competent nations, and some, like France, which have more of a "say" in some areas of the world, the majority of the world looks to the USA when the shit hits the fan. The USA has the money, power, and military might to "get things done" -- it would be foolish to believe that with all that control they would decide to act against their own interests.

    4. Re:Okayyy... by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2
      You are not the only country that has the expertise and extra money to devote to saving the world.

      Saying "we have extra cash too, we coulda done that" just doesn't inspire the same respect as for the one who actually did it.

      Wishing for kudos? Don't wait for the USA. The USA will take another 5 years and repeated warnings before it bothers to try to stop this destruction. And that's assuming that our two rocks actually are on a collision course in 2019. So here's your chance. Start working to save the world right now. Have your plan in place and a prototype built before the USA even gets started. You have time. Whatever country you represent has a chance to take the lead. If you leave it to the USA, you leave the bragging rights, too.

    5. Re:Okayyy... by roju · · Score: 1

      Ok, the thing I don't get about this thread, every seems to accept the assumption that the USA actually has 'aved the world' several times, and that no other nation has ever done so.

      When did the USA save the world? The -one- time that I can think of is getting the nukes faster than Germany, and I'm not sure I'd consider opening that can of worms 'saving the world.'

      Seriously though. How often has the world been at serious risk? The cold war? The US didn't save the world there, they put it at risk. WW1? WW2? <sarcasm>Because US soldiers were the only ones in those wars.</sarcasm>

      Yeash.

    6. Re:Okayyy... by jafac · · Score: 2

      You're talking about a country who calls NASA's Canada Arm, "the Big Arm".

      Then watch NASA's very expensively produced IMAX movie called "Destiny In Space" where Leonard Nimoy very clearly narrates about the Canadian-built robot arm.

      I tell you what I'm sick of, hearing Canadians belly-ache about the fucking robot arm. We should just tear it the fuck off and put it to work welding ford SUV's, then buy a Japanese arm at Wal Mart - those Japanese can be VERY greatful. I bet we won't hear them bitch and complain every time some American news media fails to play the Japanese national anthem, gives credit to those crafty japs and their miraculous robot arm, and suggest viewers take a week-long vacation in Japan whenever it mentions a space shuttle mission.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  45. Life imitates SatireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apparently it's too late... Check out this news flash.

  46. Ah, Those Brits by BlackGriffen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Note the picture. The asteroid in the story is a couple km wide, the one depicted was hundreds of km (big enough to discorporate this seemingly solid little planet of ours for a while). Also note that it is hitting right in the U.S. I think that the artist has some issues with Uncle Sam...

    In short, definitely unwarranted.

    BlackGriffen

    1. Re:Ah, Those Brits by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      Im sure that all of us have seen that picture at one time or another. But to this day, I still laugh my ass off every time I see it. That asteroid is exactly the size of the moon in that pic. It'd fuckin obliterate us.

    2. Re:Ah, Those Brits by m_evanchik · · Score: 2

      I think this is their standard "Big-Rock-In-Space-Whacks-Earth" illustration. I've seen it before. I guess accuracy gives way to sensationalism even at the bbc.

      Now if I wasn't such a lazy ass I'd email them to correct this misapplied illustration, but instead I'll just kvetch here : )

    3. Re:Ah, Those Brits by Ozwald · · Score: 1

      But with a rock that big, we wouldn't need a space shuttle or space elevator to get into orbit. All we would need is a really big escalader.

      Ozwald

    4. Re:Ah, Those Brits by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      If you hover, the ALT text says "NASA Simulation" - I guess the picture was provided by NASA actually.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    5. Re:Ah, Those Brits by ideonode · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did some work for BBC Online, back in the day, and this picture is basically a stock-image that they have. It is sourced from NASA's Image Exchange and since NASA images are royalty-free, this particular pic has been around the block a few times.

      I guess the fact that there are, unsurprisingly, no photographs of such events occurring means that journos with a deadline and a desperate need to source an image resort to this old cliche. It's the equivalent of slapping a cheesy space-shuttle launch onto any story about space technology. Easy and cheap and more often than not irrelevant to the story in hand.

    6. Re:Ah, Those Brits by jduckworth · · Score: 1

      I think they have been influenced by the recent (kind of) spate of films in which America gets destroyed by a large asteroid. As everyone knows if aliens invade - they land in the US

    7. Re:Ah, Those Brits by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't be as dramatic really if you saw a tiny, tiny, tine little fly-shit for a dot hitting the rather enormous planet Earth is in comparison with the true-scale asteroid...

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    8. Re:Ah, Those Brits by ideonode · · Score: 1
    9. Re:Ah, Those Brits by Daetrin · · Score: 2
      That asteroid is exactly the size of the moon in that pic

      That statement is about as inaccurate as the picture is.

      It's hard to judge from the picture, but comparing it to the size of the earth itself, it looks to be about 200 miles (300 km) across, +/- 100 or so.

      This of course is based on the fact that the earth is about 8000 miles (13,000 km) in diameter.

      The moon is a little more than 1/4th the diamater of the earth, 2,100 miles, or 3,500 km. If the moon were in that shot, it would be a _lot_ bigger.

      There are about 26 really large asteroids that would be approximatly the size of that one. They're pretty sure they've found all the really large ones, although who knows when some new object might come streaking out of the Oort Cloud.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  47. I've done a little research and.... by hagar� · · Score: 2, Funny

    Smithers! Release the flying monkeys!

    --
    Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
  48. I guess sending all our nuclear weapons towards this thing would be a good way to disarm countries like Russia, India, and Pakistan. After all, we do want them to reduce their supplies, don't we? I guess the government does.

    How about this? Coordinated Worldwide Interplanetary Nuclear Strike Day! Circa 3 days before predicted impact.

    1. Re:Nuke by BrianGa · · Score: 1

      A world without nuclear weapons is a far scarier than a world than one with such weapons.

    2. Re:Nuke by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

      Sure. Let's see you get China to sign that. Or how about Iraq (As far as I know, they don't have them yet, but they would certainly get busy on it should this happen).

      Wouldn't that be wonderful? Russia and USA without nukes. And countries that have shown willingness to use force to obtain their objectives with them. (Not that USA and Russia aren't... but they have at least some method to their madness)

      Here is my example.
      Mr. X has a gun. He walks up to my house.
      "Give me your house" Mr. X demands.

      In this situation would you rather:
      A. Hold your hands up in the air, walk out into the street and forfeit all right to your own property.
      B. Argue with the man holding the gun, claiming that you have a stick upstairs and you aren't afraid to use it.
      C. Pull the shotgun from the mantle and tell Mr. X to get off your lawn.

      You decide.

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
  49. Not the Liama by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    Liama's attack People!!! I won't be able to sleep tonight!!!!!!!!!!!!

  50. Pull it into Earth orbit and... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. mine it for data;

    2. use it as a platform for whatever;

    3. sell pieces of it to whomever;

    4. mine it for whatever minerals it may carry;

    5. ...and, well, you get the point. If it's coming close enough, let's turn it in to something useful.

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    1. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by hagar� · · Score: 5, Funny

      pull it into earth orbit.

      Well im fresh out of tractor beams today, and I think at 28km/s I wont be pulling along side it in the Pinto. But fear not it will have a use!

      We will finally be rid of Britney Spears.

      --
      Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
    2. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by Kelerain · · Score: 1

      Not such a bad idea. As I remeber the 'space elevator' concept's best working model was to use a large asteriod at the other end as a 'tether'. Do we have the technology and funds to do this? It could prove to be quite a boon. I wonder if the ISS could use it for anything..

    3. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      Yes, could prove to be most valuable, especially when you consider the cost of getting materials out of our gravity well into orbit.

      Sheesh, just as a platform it could be a wonderful addition to science. Depending on the composition of the rock it could be used as a platform for small manufacturing base or a scientific research base or even a destination for space tourists. Be much cheaper than going to the moon for the "money is no object" crowd.

      My guess is that data and materials would be the most useful application for the rock, but again, that depends on its composition.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    4. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      Well, it's not _that_ big or going _that_ fast and it's a number of years out yet.

      It could be slowed down by putting one of those big solar sails attached to the front of it. May even be able to use the sail to change trajectory. (sp?)

      That it's discovered now when it's some many years out means there is some time to do some planning and design work to get all the pieces together to do the "catch" of the rock.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    5. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      you put that in a near by orbit, its gravity will play havoc on the earth.

      we could put it on the moon, then send people there to mine it.

      I want to put it on the moon, I've seen "thundar the barbarian", so I know what will happen.

      OTOH, I think Bruse Willis could play Havoc, but that has nothing to do with asteroids.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      A 2km rock isn't going to have much gravity when compared to the moon or Earth. I think the effect of it's gravity wouldn't be much of a factor, but then I'm not a rocket scientist (hey, new acronym, INARS -- oops, Limey trolls gonna love that one!)

      Cheers,

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    7. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by UTPinky · · Score: 1

      6.) Get Linux running on it

      --
      I'm only paranoid because everyone is against me...
    8. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      "6.) Get Linux running on it"

      Imagine a Beowolf cluster of _those_!

      Sorry, I just couldn't resist.

      Funny reply, thanks.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    9. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by 0spf · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...we will have a really big rock to throw at any one who pisses us off.

    10. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by dumbunny · · Score: 1

      Not likely. 28 km/sec is 20 or 25 times as fast as the moon's relative velocity to the earth, if my mental calculations are correct. You're not going to pull it into orbit with Y2.019K technology; the only way I can think of to bring it into the earth's orbit would be to make it collide with the moon.

    11. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      Hmmm. Okay, if the rock could be controlled (steered) perhaps the upper atmosphere of Venus could be used to slow it down. But, considering the composition of the rock, it'd probably break up under that much stress.

      Oh well, maybe the next rock 'round.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    12. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      1. Pull asteroid into Earth orbit.
      2. ....
      3. Profit!

    13. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      I'm afraid the Japanese might get hurt too. Where would we get our supplies of quality asian porn?

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    14. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      not much effect on the moon or earth.... but what about the hundreds of communication sattelites + ISS? i wouldn't be suprised to see more than a few sattelites thrown out of whack due to a 2 km asteroid (turned meteroite)

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    15. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by silentbozo · · Score: 2

      Why put it into orbit? Why not stabilize it at one of the Lagrange points? We're gonna need some rocks in a stable position betweeen Earth and the Moon if we're going to put up resupply stations.

    16. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      if it was in an earth orbit buildings could be tied down to one side and the rock will shelter them from at least half of the debris all over the place up there.

    17. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by guybarr · · Score: 1

      how about a series of thermonuclear detonations ?

      say radius ~ 1 KM => mass ~ 3*10^15 gr
      v=30Km/sec = 3*10^6 cm/s => Energy ~ 3*10^28 ergs

      1 Megaton TNT is 4.5* 10^ 22 ergs

      and IIRC we have TN bombs of hundreds of megatons:
      300 megaton ~ 10^25 ergs

      so 3000 such bombs will do the trick ...

      and this is a rough calculation, actually the asteroid will lose mass due to evaporation, so the number may be considerably lower.

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
    18. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by MrSeb · · Score: 3, Funny

      5. ...and, well, you get the point. If it's coming close enough, let's turn it in to something useful.

      How about making a Deathstar?

    19. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      The Lagrange Points ARE in orbit.

      Also, the stable Lagrange Points (4 & 5) are as far from the moon as Earth is...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    20. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by cybercuzco · · Score: 2
      1. mine it for data;
      Like the Google Database

      2. use it as a platform for whatever;
      Linux, BSD, solaris

      3. sell pieces of it to whomever;

      4. Make a Beowulf cluster out of it

      --

    21. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Time to go to work
      Work all night
      Search for asteroids hey!
      We won't stop until we have asteroids
      Yum tum yummy tum hey!

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    22. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      eyepeepackets writes:

      1. mine it for data; 2. use it as a platform for whatever; 3. sell pieces of it to whomever;
      4. mine it for whatever minerals it may carry; 5. ...and, well, you get the point. If it's coming close enough, let's turn it in to something useful.


      How do you suggest we slow down a 2km-wide rock moving at 28km/s to achieve this?

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    23. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      This may be a horrendously stupid idea, but if so I'd like to know why it is.
      But could we tether this thing to the moon with some serious cables, and use the differential to create electricity, that we could use to power installations built on the asteroid and on the moon? I dunno how feasible that is, but if nothing else it would be a step closer to a space elevator of we pointed the rock towards earth, tethered it to the moon, stuck some bigass nuke reactors on it with engines on them to make sure that if the tether breaks we have a way to fire it up and keep its orbit from degrading and falling on us... There's gotta be all kinds of good shit you can do with a 2km asteroid tethered to the moon.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    24. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      "How do you suggest we slow down a 2km-wide rock moving at 28km/s to achieve this?"

      Remember that IANARS, just a bloody bloke thinking of ways to catch a rock, okay?

      Here's some ideas:

      1. Solar sails. Either teathered to the rear or attached to the front of the rock.

      2. Nukes aren't gonna work. Most of the power of nukes as we know it comes from the blast effect which requires a medium to work (air or water). You'll fragment the rock before you slow it down if you use nukes directly attached to the rock. Now a nuke motor is an entirely different animal. I remember seeing an article awhile back about a motor which used small, controlled nuke explosions to generate thrust; this could work.

      3. Assuming steering of the rock could be achieved (that's one big assumption,) then using the atmosphere of Venus could be used to slow down a rock (maybe not this rock, initial reports are that it may be a "gravel" type rock which would possibly shatter when under any significant stress.)

      4. Break up the rock into more managable sized pieces and work on them separately, assuming less mass per piece makes them easier to work with. In a gravity-challenged environment (Oy, PC-ism hath long arms) the result could be just more trouble than the initial single rock.

      5. Leave the rock to its current orbit, but use it's repeated close passage to attach the required devices/structures to work the rock. This might be the best solution, but could be more expensive than just parking the rock nearby.

      Anyway, where's there's a will, there's a way or so the saying goes.

      P.S. Anyone know why when I enter "its" it shows on slashdot as "it's?"

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    25. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by Cygnusx12 · · Score: 1

      .. And what of the millions of little meterorites you're bound to create with just an explosion?

      I can just picture the llama/pinto sized chunks of solid iron raining down now.

    26. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      Yo Yak! I saw a YakYak site today, thanks to another poster who gave me the URL.

      What a stange and wonderful world we live in:

      Yaks and gnus and llamas too
      Can all come out to play.
      But Bills and Steves with evil grieves
      Do plot to ruin your way.

      So stay sharp and watch out for flying, chomping hamburgers!

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    27. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

      Would an object 2km in size effect things like tides? Maybe it is too small for that but it is something to consider........

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
    28. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      it would be much closer to the earth then the moon. If you apply the inverse square, you'll see how fast the gravity begins to have an impact on the earth as the object approachs.

      On reflection, I may have overstated the effects of that much mass, but there would at least be some measurable impact.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    29. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by guybarr · · Score: 1

      actually I'm not sure how much solid debries stays after a thermonuclear explosion.

      anything the size of a sand-grain and below will be ionized by UV radiation from sun and caught in the sun-wind (it has it's own embeded magnetic field), and is therefore not a problem.

      and my guess is most of the debries mass will not be larger; however you're right in saying this does constitutes a problem, not so much to earth (the large chunks you can detect, smaller will burn in atmosphere), as to spaceships and sattelites.

      note, also, the original poster said such a feat is impossible in today's technology, and my answer is this does not seem impossible, just very costly and undesirable; it should only be done if the asteroid is on a confirmed collision course with earth. In that case, several megaton sized explosions on earth and a serious future problem for spacecraft are a small cost compared with total-asteroid impact ...

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
    30. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by guybarr · · Score: 1

      You didn't account for the inefficiency factor ...
      one half of the solid angle at the bomb would be outer space so you loose 1/2 the energy right there


      Right, but this was an O.O.M. calculation anyway, factors less than 10 I don't take into account.

      a lot of the energy doesn't go into momentum change but it other stuff like melting, heating, or break up the rock

      My guess is you're wrong there: Since the energies at the boundry of the rock are at least ~ 10eV the important processes are ablation of the rock and thermal expansion of the gas. The energy difference is so large at such a short time these processes would probably be adiabatic. melting occurs at ~0.1 eV, breaking and other solid-state phenomena at even lower energies, by the time you're at such energies most of the energy is far gone.

      In short, the major processes are probably adiabatic, so my calculation still seems reasonable, even conservative, since I did not consider mass loss due to ablation.

      I made one serious error, though: I calculated how much would it take to STOP the asteroid, when all you need is to deflect it far enough ...

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
    31. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      I thought that 3000 300MT bombs seemed awfull high. If it were going to hit the Earth, and we had 17 years or warning, it would only have to be deflected a very miniscule amount. Ther Earth is a very small target! Oh, and the largetst TN bomb I ever heard of was a 50 MT one the Soviets detonated in the 60s, but they claimed to have a 100 MT one. Maybe we could develop special "extra-large" nukes for just this purpose if we needed to.

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
    32. Re:Pull it into Earth orbit and... by guybarr · · Score: 1

      it would only have to be deflected a very miniscule amount.

      yea, you're right. I acknowledged this error on another post.

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. Re:AHHH! by sgage · · Score: 2

    Yes, we're all gonna die! That's the Great Equalizer... nobody gets out alive!

  53. 17 Years by CodeWheeney · · Score: 1

    Damn, should have gone with that 30 year mortgage during the refinancing instead of the 15.

    --
    C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
  54. 1 in 100,000 probability by Fzz · · Score: 1
    NASA gives the probability of collision at 1 in 100,000. The average person in the west lives roughly 25,000 days, but your chance of dying on any particular day is strongly weighted towards old-age, so if you'll still be young on Feb 1st 2019, it's by far your most likely cause of death on that day.

    But I don't think I'm going to lose sleep over it.

    - Fzz

  55. Time's running out! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most of you only have 16 years to lose your virginity!

    Heh teasin =)

    1. Re:Time's running out! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2
      "Does "getting fucked by an asteroid" count?"
      "Now I know how all those white women musta felt..."
    2. Re:Time's running out! by plover · · Score: 2
      Given the average SlashGeek, I'd say that's about a 0.23 on the Palermo scale.

      That means you'll either lose your virginity or be trampled by a water buffalo by then.

      --
      John
  56. H-Bomb by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    No problem. In 19 years a H-bomb could change the asteroid's trajectory enough, I think. There is the added danger that it might go off on the way to the target. Hopefully the warhead wouldn't arm itself before it get's far enough away from the earth. But, ya'll know with everything connetected to the INTERNET, including pace makers and the power grid that it could get hacked.

    --You can't win if you don't play but you can loose.--EBM

    1. Re:H-Bomb by Frambooz · · Score: 1

      What about fragments created by the H-bomb-explosion? 40 200m astriod-fragments heading for earth are far more scary than one bulky 2km astriod, imho...

      --
      No encryption can withstand the power of the Lucky Guess.
    2. Re:H-Bomb by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Maybe a neutron bomb wouldn't make as many fragments then. We'll it's not going to get us now, so they say.

  57. Next up: by sulli · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bush declares war on A Rock!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Next up: by shut_up_man · · Score: 1

      Heh...

      The War on Drugs
      The War on Terrorism

      and now...

      The War on Rocks

    2. Re:Next up: by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Bush declares war on A Rock!

      If the asteroid smashes Sadam in Iraq, time to start worshipping Bush's god, even if it/he/she is an ahole.

      (It is always assumed that God will be a nice person/thing. He/she/it could actually turn out to be a moody egotistical jerk. You know, just like one of *us*.)

  58. Bummer.. by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    We may never see Mozilla 2.0. :(

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Bummer.. by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      We may never see Mozilla 2.0.

      Or GNU Hurd...

    2. Re:Bummer.. by HoBuster · · Score: 1

      We may never see Internet Explorer 7. :)

  59. Preparing for such a cataclysm by Vess+V. · · Score: 1

    If the collision course was indeed confirmed to intersect Earth at the right time, and it would be likely that entire civilizations could be wiped out, the best way to "save humanity" would be to start OCRing every text describing our history, and backing up copies across all corners of the globe. If you think about it, what else is more worth saving? What else more strongly defines us as human race that we are? Without it, we are nothing but a bunch of walking, talking, intelligent hairless apes. Five thousand years of wars, philosophies, arts, and sciences are what we think of when we think of the human race.

    In order to do any kind of "restoration" of who we are after a cataclysmic event, we'd need as much of our recorded history as possible -- the writings of Plato, Aristotle, all the rest of the great thinkers, and of all of the events that have shaped our world -- dating back to that of the Sumerian civilization who first wrote down what we know about them 4-5 millenia ago.

    We should start this right now, to whatever degree feasible... just in case, so we're ready for any unforseen event that happens.

  60. 0.06? by krogoth · · Score: 2

    According to the BBC, this is the first object to get a positive score...

    --

    They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
  61. You know what this means... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    ... we need a protective layer of smog. Throw enough garbage into the atmosphere and the asteroid'll burn up.

    Quick! Everybody guy a Canyonero!

    1. Re:You know what this means... by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

      20 feet long,
      2 lanes wide;
      21 tons of American pride!
      Canyonero! Hyah! Canyonero!

      Heck, with a machine like that all you'd have to do is lasso the damn thing and -pull- it out of its orbit. =)

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    2. Re:You know what this means... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Somebody needs to make a 'Canyonero' mod for Grand Theft Auto 3. Heh.

  62. About LINEAR (the guys who found the big rock) by paranoidia · · Score: 5, Informative

    It was first seen on the night of 5 July, picked up by the Linear Observatory's automated sky survey programme in New Mexico, in the southern US.

    I work at Lincoln labs and acutally know the people running the LINEAR project (they are so proud that they are the best in the world, let me tell you). But for the rest of you, here is their website.

    They find more than half of the new NEO (Near earth orbit) asteroids each year that are found. They have a telescope down in New Mexico and have the largest CCD (2560x1960 res) in the market. That's the thing that takes a digital image of the sky and compares it to past images to see if any "stars" have moved...i.e asteroid. The higher resolution you can get, the further out you can see. From their webpage, you can see they have found at least 951 NEO's. So there are a LOT of asteroids comming near us. But in space, near is still very far away. So unpack those bunkers and return to Real Life, we're still safe for a while. Also, the rate of finding new NEO's is decreasing, so that means that we've (humans) found most of the asteroids that can endanger us.
    (most of that was taken from this post of mine from a while ago)

    1. Re:About LINEAR (the guys who found the big rock) by Keeper · · Score: 2

      Current CCDs are capable of greater than 2560x1960 acquisitions. The camera I'm currently working with captures images at 3072x2048.

    2. Re:About LINEAR (the guys who found the big rock) by Ashyukun · · Score: 1

      Well, at least he didn't say Lincoln -LOGS-....

  63. This is less than 1 in a million chance of impact by mbone · · Score: 1

    Don Yeomans of JPL says that the predicted cross-track error ellipse at the time of impact is 10's of millions of kilometers. Since the diameter of the Earth is 6371 km, and since the probability of impact goes as the square of the (radius / cross track orbit uncertainty), the probability of impact is less than one in 1 million.

    Within a week, this will be narrowed by several orders of magnitude, so it is highly likely that the predicted impact will vanish.

  64. um... ok.. by blue_zero · · Score: 1

    so are we supposed to take this seriously or is this just another way to get attention?????

    --
    I support publik eduscatation!
  65. Try the JPL orbit calculator by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    JPL has a nice Java orbital calculator Java applet. Set the date to January 28, 2019 for closest approach. Those numbers aren't high-accuracy.

    The higher-precision text-based orbital calculator is more accurate. (And overloaded right now.) It has 2002 NT7 in its database. Both claim January 28, 2019 is the date of closest approach. Both claim closest approach around 0.8 AU. Remember, this is projecting many orbits ahead, and small-object orbit projection is inherently noisy because minor disturbing forces matter.

    Either we'll know it's a definite miss in a few weeks, or this will be a worry for some time to come.

    1. Re:Try the JPL orbit calculator by Sanctuary · · Score: 1

      Of course you meant 0.081AU or about 7.76 million miles.

    2. Re:Try the JPL orbit calculator by Animats · · Score: 2

      Yes, 0.08 AU. Thanks.

    3. Re:Try the JPL orbit calculator by Jherico · · Score: 2
      Both claim closest approach around 0.8 AU.

      That's the perihelion distance, which is the closest it gets to the SUN, not to the earth. Closest approach to earth will probably be quite a lot less than 6 light minutes if anyone has cause to be concerned.

      --

      Jherico

      What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

  66. just for fun... by usfGPM · · Score: 1

    Ok, let's assume for a brief moment that the rock is going to slam into us AND that by some horrible miscalculation it is the size of Greenland AND there is nothing we can do about it?

    Assuming that roving gangs of long haired, dirty children have not killed you (a la Mad Max) yet, how do you spend the last 24 hours of human existence?

    Bonus for creativity. :)

    1. Re:just for fun... by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 1

      I'd shave my eyebrows and fart in a minor key...

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    2. Re:just for fun... by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

      A. Wake up about 6:00 AM.
      B. Drive to work.
      C. Work for several hours. (Wondering about this blissfully empty and tranquil working environment, but not questioning too much... wouldn't want to curse it after all)
      D. Drive most of the way home.
      E. Get struck by -large- rock.

      I'm always the last thing to know these things. I suspect that it's a conspiracy.

      "Should we tell Spork?"
      "Nah. He ate the last donut yesterday."

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
  67. asteroids? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't worry everyone. I spent most of my youth in the local arcade preparing for just such an event!

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  68. Palermo scale by SiliconEntity · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The Palermo scale, on which this object has a value of 0.06, is described at JPL. According to the accompanying paper, it is intended for the use of professional astronomers and is not intended for communicating risks to the general public. A different scale, the Torino scale, which has integer values from 0 to 10, is intended for that purpose. This object is probably a Torino 2.

    A Palermo value of 0.06 means that the risk from this object is elevated above the background risk for such objects by about 15%. (The 0.06 is the log of the ratio of the risk to the background risk.) So however worried you were yesterday about collisions with 2 km asteroids, you can be 15% more worried today.

    In short, not worth losing sleep over.

  69. Funny you should mention that... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

    I was run over by a llama earlier today.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  70. Dibs... by geekoid · · Score: 2

    ...on the Liv Tyler part.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  71. Re:Hmm! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    This was bound to happen. Hell, NT5 came real close and I figure that if we somehow manage to survive NT6 then there's no way on earth that NT7 is going to be survivable.

    And yeah it's bashing Windows. If the shoe fits.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  72. I've seen this one before... by C.U.T.M. · · Score: 1

    Armageddon. The U.S. govt will hire a bunch of hicks to drill a hole into the asteroid, place a nuclear bomb, and leave one guy behind to detonate it! The rock will barely miss the Earth and we will all continue living our lives. I wish they'd come up with something new already.

    1. Re:I've seen this one before... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for volunteering to stay behind. All you have to do is push this button. Thanks.

  73. On the Plus Side... by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    This should pretty much solve that pesky global warming problem...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  74. Damn it by Max+the+Merciless · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I can't go outside and loot now?

    --
    * * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
  75. Microsoft NT7 by uberstool · · Score: 1

    Can't Microsoft figure out a better way to install NT7?

  76. Nope. Can't do it... by Whammy666 · · Score: 1
    To whom it may concern,

    Due to a conflict on Feb 1, 2019, please reschedule the destruction of the Earth by giant meteorite to November 3, 2025. The year 2019 through most of 2024 has already been scheduled for devistation by global warming and plagues of alien headcrabs.

    Thanks,
    Mother Nature.

    --
    When all else fails, run.
  77. Big deal... by eatenn · · Score: 2, Funny

    By the time 2019 rolls around, machines will rule the world, it'll be their damn problem.

    --
    "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
    1. Re:Big deal... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      The machines already do. We're trapped in The Matrix and we don't even know it. The machines finally realized that lions generate more body heat than humans and don't need their minds kept busy in a virtual reality like we do. The machines need some time though to grow enough lions to replace humanity before we're all destroyed by the asterloid.

    2. Re:Big deal... by napdawger42 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you didn't mean to say "DAMN DIRTY APES!"?

  78. Recent close approaches by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    this is pretty good:

    http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/neo/close.html

    give distances both in AU and LD (lunar distances) for the dozen or so close passes that happen each month or so.

    Not that you should be alarmed.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  79. Earth Buffer? by n-baxley · · Score: 2

    "This unique event should not diminish the fact that additional observations in coming weeks will almost certainly, we hope, eliminate the current threat."

    Is he saying this just because the odds of a tiny (relativley) piece of something has a very slim chance of hitting a slightly less tiny(relativly) object in the whole universe? Or is there some property of Earth's magnetic field or some other force that would cause things to be pushed away from us? I would think we'd pull stuff towards us due to gravity, but I'm no physicist (or spelling bee champion).

  80. Re:Minor linguistic quibble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's ok to end sentences with ellipses. But, never end a sentence with an ellipse. Even during an eclipse, an ellipse is a geometric figure, not a figure of speech. An ellipsis on the other hand...

  81. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by Scaebor · · Score: 1

    Sure, in normal business a company would stand to make a killing in something with so wide and presumably desperate a market (the whole world, or at least that one lucky continent), but does anyone truthfully think that if something like this truthfully stood to impact earth in as devastating a manner as predicted by the article that copyright laws would be honored at all? If the company demanded anything (monetary or otherwise) at all for using their copyright, it would result in the company being risen up against by a panicked populace and/or simply having their ideas taken at gunpoint by the threatened government(s).
    Surely if we have learned anything over the past months it is that the government can justify most anything in the name of an emergency, and a government forseeing its entire continent devastated would certainly not hesitate to simply take and use the processes covered by the copyright possessed by this company by any means necessary.

    --
    "Hey brother Christian with your high and mighty errand / your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying"
  82. Terrorism attack by Wouter+Van+Hemel · · Score: 1


    This has Bin Laden written all over it.

  83. NT7? by lazarus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The impact on the Earth of NT4 and NT5 was bad enough...

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
  84. XP = NT 5.1 by zuriW · · Score: 1

    Check it out for yourself... - which is why I don't run XP - Just 2K with some extra cosmetics that slows down the computer :( Oh - and the constant communication probably slows down the internet connection as well...

    1. Re:XP = NT 5.1 by Transcendent · · Score: 2

      Oh - and the constant communication probably slows down the internet connection as well...

      Component Services... you can shut all that down from there and give your computer a performance boost... and possibly a CPU cool down...

    2. Re:XP = NT 5.1 by specialized_sworks · · Score: 1

      Please!

      Tell us how!

      -Dubya

    3. Re:XP = NT 5.1 by Transcendent · · Score: 2

      Control Panel > Administrative Options > Component Services...

      http://www.deviantpc.com/forums/showthread.php?s =& threadid=1926

      that tells you pretty much what everything does...

  85. Hows the last 8 hours instead.... by hagar� · · Score: 1

    Asteroid or no asteroid, I am not breaking in on my nap time.

    8AM: Awaken to sounds of sporadic gunfire in my neighbourhood. Refuse to shower or brush teeth. Feast on Breakfast consisting mainly of bacon and coco pops. Place large axe through current PC and monitor, drag battered Case outside to tie to the bumper of the neighbours car.

    8AM: Wearing only boxers, fluffy bunny slippers and an assault rifle borrowed from some dead guy who caught a bullet on my lawn, drive down highway at 100mph in neighbours car, PC Case clattering and sparking behind. Neighbour is in the Trunk. His wife is it home with a satisfied look on her face.

    10AM: Abandon Car infront of Bill Gates residence. Knock repeatedly on door, but no answer. It appears Bill did leave on that Russian escape transport after all as appeared on the last news broadcast a week ago. Find several MS Marketing managers, execute them gangland style.

    12 Noon: Hungry. Stop to steal pop n fresh from local quickie mart. Proceed on killing spree. Follow a Microbus packed with hippies on highway, pull them over for a chat.

    12:10PM: Smoking a joint as large as my arm, I have commandeered an I max theater, I slap in my copy of "Mars Attacks" and eat 1 week old popcorn. Its full of buttery goodness.

    3PM: Emerge from IMax in refreshed state, steal deck chairs from Walmart, and seek a suitable place to watch the impact with a case of beer.

    4PM: Watch asteroid streak overhead, and miss Earth entirely. Seems they miscalculated the trajectory as well as the size. Feeling very dissappointed, I continue the killing spree.

    --
    Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
  86. That picture by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    is the same picture they use for /every/ story about near-hit asteroids. Just like Slashdot uses a picture of gateborg for all MS stories.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  87. Wiping out Earth... by Carthis · · Score: 1

    I always knew that NT would wipe out all life as we know it.

  88. Palermo Scale by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case you're wondering what this means (and I was):

    The Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale was developed to enable NEO specialists to categorize and prioritize potential impact risks spanning a wide range of impact dates, energies and probabilities. Actual scale values less than -2 reflect events for which there are no likely consequences, while Palermo Scale values between -2 and 0 indicate situations that merit careful monitoring. Potential impacts with positive Palermo Scale values will generally indicate situations that merit some level of concern.

    The scale compares the likelihood of the detected potential impact with the average risk posed by objects of the same size or larger over the years until the date of the potential impact. This average risk from random impacts is known as the background risk. For convenience the scale is logarithmic, so, for examples, a Palermo Scale value of -2 indicates that the detected potential impact event is only 1% as likely as a random background event occurring in the intervening years, a value of zero indicates that the single event is just as threatening as the background hazard, and a value of +2 indicates an event that is 100 times more likely than a background impact by an object at least as large before the date of the potential impact in question.

    Taken from NASA: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/doc/palermo.html

    --
    "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
  89. Better odds than winning a lottery by kireK · · Score: 1

    If the odds are truely 1 in a million, then they are over 36 times better than your average state lottery.

  90. Re:Bruce Willis, dead at 47 by geekoid · · Score: 2

    buddy, that was funny.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  91. What if NT7 hits another planet before 2019? by C.U.T.M. · · Score: 1

    Has anyone done calculations to see wether or not NT7 will be gone before 2019, e.g. it hits another planet? It comes very close to Venus sometime next year (or so shows the Java applet). Just a thought. It is possible it could hit another planet before 2019.

  92. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by GreenPhreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually there are contingency plans that we as a planet can do with this much advanced warning.

    Most asteroids such as this one are almost black in color and reflect very little incident light; this coupled with their small size make them very difficult to detect. There is a property in physics called albedo (no, not libido) which is basically the 'reflectivity' of an extraterrestrial object (the moon has an albedo of ~.1, ie it reflects ~10% of incident light). If we could find a way to change one side of an earth-collision asteroid to have a higher albedo, perhaps by icing it with water ice, then we have effectively made a motor to push the asteroid off its normal orbit. More light would be reflected on one side than the other, causing a slight difference in the number of photons absorbed on one side compared to the other. This absorption differential would be enough over time to significantly alter the orbit of an asteroid. But this is the sort of thing that won't work in 18 days, it would have to be several years for the photon force to make a real change in the orbit. That is why we have the NEAR program, to determine orbits of near-earth asteroids in advance so we have a lot of time to figure out an appropriate way of dealing with them.

    Something like icing an asteroid is much easier than landing a manned crew on it to put a rocket on it or blow it up or the other things suggested in this thread. It could be done using entirely automated systems.

    Oh, and I don't believe that methods for avoiding the extinction of our species should be patented...

    --
    I drink to prepare for a fight; tonight I'm very prepared. -Soda Popinksi
  93. Now wait a second!!! by Ruger · · Score: 1

    foul-mouthed No arguement there.
    perverted You must be taking about Rock Hound, the Buscemi character.
    semi-illiterate WRONG! At least in the case of Buscemi's character who had TWO PhD's according to the movie. Let's get our facts straight here fellas!

    Ruger

    1. Re:Now wait a second!!! by valmont · · Score: 2
      heh. u sound like comicbookstoreguy. "worst analogy ever".

  94. Palermo scale explanation by zaius · · Score: 5, Informative
    The Palermo scale is a scale that asses the danger posed by an orbiting body compared to that which we constantly face by unknown, "background" bodies. Specifically, the Earth is 10^(palermo value) times as likely to get hit by whatever object we're talking about than by a background object of equal or greater size within the time period before the projected impact. As you can see, palermo values greater than zero mean that we are more likely to get hit by this object than by a background object; values less than 0 indicate that we shouldn't sweat it too much.

    So, the palermo value of 0.06 (p is just greater than one) means we are very, very slightly more likely to get hit by NT7 than we are to get hit by another astreroid of equal or greater size before 2019.

    1. Re:Palermo scale explanation by Maniakes · · Score: 1
      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
  95. Instead of blowing up ... by dingbat2002 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be possible to change it's delta-v to place it in a stable circular orbit around the earth? Why piddle with little tinker-toy space stations when you could have a kilometer-size rock in a stable orbit to play with to make a real orbital outpost?

  96. This is a hoax by IXI · · Score: 1

    M$ no longer supports Windos NT, so there will be no NT7 to hit earth.

    --
    He saw some dirty arabs and fired. Too bad it was just some friendly kurds, BBC reporters and his fellow cowboys.
  97. When it passes... by Jon+Howard · · Score: 1

    Stick a webcam on it aimed back at us (to avoid destruction from head-on collisions) and send it on its merry way.

    After that's done, everyone can be an astronaut, the same way everyone's sexually gratified and everyone's seen the world nowadays.

    Hooray for webcammery!

  98. won't worry, it's a beta by Joseph+Lam · · Score: 1

    > Those aliens are running NT7 already!

    So when did Bill managed to find those guys for beta testing?

    But anyway we are pretty safe - it's 17 years and I think it won't make it. My NT5 won't last longer than a month.

    Even if it does make it we can simply send a hacker there and upload some virus to break its shield.

  99. Send Up M$ by ehorizon · · Score: 1

    Send up M$ to claim the rock as IP... Then watch the rock crumble under the pressure.

    PROBLEM SOLVED !!!

    1. Re:Send Up M$ by JimPooley · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I refer you to the following comic strip
      It's funny because it's true.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  100. Re:The Mayan calendar (clarification) by Armarius · · Score: 1

    My mistake, I should have said that the Long Count Calendar resets on December 21, 2012. Some believe that this cycle reset will herald/predicts a catastrophic event, hence the earlier comment.

  101. I like the illustration by vandelais · · Score: 2

    The article says that it is estimated to be 2K wide, but the illustration shows that it is several weather systems long AND wide.

    I don't trust the BBC. I'm waiting for Al Roker's take on all this.

    The worst part is that kids will get a day off from school that I had NO CHANCE of getting off.

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
  102. Re:So has anyone called Bruce Willis yet? by UTPinky · · Score: 1

    he was killed in 6th sense...

    --
    I'm only paranoid because everyone is against me...
  103. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2

    The cold hard fact is that if an asteroid wants to hit the earth it is going to hit the earth. There is more or less NOTHING we can do with our present technology, or technology in the forseeable future.

    Even with this, 19 year lead in time I'd be surprised if the collective powers that be could get something organised to nudge the asteroid far enough off course that it ceases to be a threat. Most asteroids are not found until far far closer than this.

    The ONLY way our species will survive is to expand off planet - for a multitude of reasons, not the least of which is asteroid collision wiping out THIS colony.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  104. A linux solution has already been developed... by Ruger · · Score: 1

    ...to handle this scenerio.

    Spaced Penguins

    Ruger

  105. Don't laugh yet.. :( by SectoidRandom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You may be joking but there is some truth to what you say, I think we may need something like this to open our eyes a little. A lot of evidence points to asteroid impact likely being the biggest actual threat to mankind, but despite this far to many short sighted politicians wont give it a second thought! Specifically I'm talking about the Australian govt who a while back cut all funds to asteroid search programs, virtually leaving the entire southern hemisphere unchecked for such potential threats.

    Hope you don't feel too safe with the fact that NASA and many European astronomers are searching the skies daily for these threats... Someone's letting us down.
    (nb yep im an aussie..)

    1. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by yobbo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Give us a fucking break! Do you expect that our nation of 19.7 million people be responsibile for the whole southern hemisphere? What do you think we'd do even if we did spot something out there? Put it in mandatory detention?!

    2. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by 2g3-598hX · · Score: 1

      Hey, all we need to get the government into action is to say that there are a couple of hundred intergalactic asylum seekers hitching a ride on the asteroid - they'll nuke it within a month. Your an aussie you know what I'm talking about :)

    3. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by AoT · · Score: 1

      would that really work that well?

    4. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by Jherico · · Score: 2
      Specifically I'm talking about the Australian govt who a while back cut all funds to asteroid search programs, virtually leaving the entire southern hemisphere unchecked for such potential threats.

      Actually, I believe that most asteroid threats lie in the plane of the eccliptic, which means you see them coming from pretty much anywhere on the planet.

      Anything NOT coming from the plane of the eccliptic is probably interstellar and thus likely moving WAY too fast to get to and divert without some major advances in technology.

      --

      Jherico

      What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

    5. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by sdo1 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Specifically I'm talking about the Australian govt who a while back cut all funds to asteroid search programs, virtually leaving the entire southern hemisphere unchecked for such potential threats.

      Would anyone actually notice if the southern hemisphere went away?

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    6. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by scarhill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I believe that most asteroid threats lie in the plane of the eccliptic, which means you see them coming from pretty much anywhere on the planet.

      According to the article, the obit of this asteroid is quite inclined to the ecliptic, which is why it wasn't detected earlier.

      Anything NOT coming from the plane of the eccliptic is probably interstellar and thus likely moving WAY too fast to get to and divert without some major advances in technology.

      Not so. This object is in a high inclination orbit. A southern herisphere observatory might be critical to detecting an object in an orbit that spends most of its time in the southern sky.

    7. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by Ztream · · Score: 1

      Funny, I always thought of Man as the greatest threat to mankind.

    8. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by anshil · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      A lot of evidence points to asteroid impact likely being the biggest actual threat to mankind

      Oh come on, what for evidence? Compared to other threats? I say there are dozends dangers far more likely, and which need a lot more attendance for now than stupid astroids. They didn't kill mankind for 10.000 years, so they most likely will not do in the next 100 one. I don't say there never will be something large looking into our direction, but take it easy guys, and additionally asteroids is not the only astronomical accident that may happen, there are far more, just not spectaluar enough to make movies from. How about a supernova in our quater of the galaxy? We will be ripped away. How about things that we don't even know about? Or a strong neurino star far far away, pointing it's north pole exactly on erath for a while? We will radiated to nothingness. Who says the whole univese is not suddendly slipping into a hole of some kind of superuniverse we don't even have an idea of today? (and stops to exist as whole?) Just calm down.

      However what about global earth warming? Oil resources? Malaria? The pest coming back? Wars in near east, American Nations believing they a are the gloval polica and can let do whatever they want. etc. etc.

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    9. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by jechoe · · Score: 1

      Comets travel much faster than asteroids in general. They have a highly elliptical orbit and (according to Kepler) they will be moving faster the closer they are to the sun.

      --
      Push the envelope. Watch it bend.
    10. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      this asteroid is quite inclined to the ecliptic

      Who cares what it likes!?? Just blow the damn thing up! You pointy-headed nerds kill me.

    11. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why would anything...coming from interstellar space move any faster than our everyday, regular in-solar-system asteroids.

      If it's something from far away, then unless it were going really fast it wouldn't get here yet.

    12. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by HiThere · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's because there isn't a global inertial frame of reference.

      The rock may be moving quite slowly wrt the place that it departed from, but the sun is moving also, and so is the earth. To expect them to encounter something from "out there" that happens to share their inertial frame of reference... if it did, you wouldn't encounter it. So it will have an inertia more aligned with some other star. Could be quite different from anything local. (It might not, also, but that's not the interesting case.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    13. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by rmohr02 · · Score: 2

      Well, we'd have a little less gravity--I could finally dunk a basketball!

    14. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by mrogers · · Score: 3, Funny
      How about a supernova in our quater of the galaxy? We will be ripped away. How about things that we don't even know about? Or a strong neurino star far far away, pointing it's north pole exactly on erath for a while? We will radiated to nothingness. Who says the whole univese is not suddendly slipping into a hole of some kind of superuniverse we don't even have an idea of today? (and stops to exist as whole?) Just calm down.

      Calm down? CALM DOWN? You just mentioned three ways the human race could be annihilated that I've never even thought about and there's not a damn thing we can do about it and you want me to CALM DOWN? Well YOU can calm down mister, I'm going out to buy a tin-foil helmet RIGHT NOW!

      However what about global earth warming? Oil resources? Malaria? The pest coming back?

      Better make that a tin-foil helmet AND a copper torc bracelet!

    15. Re:Don't laugh yet.. :( by rjkimble · · Score: 2

      I doubt Australia has any really good places from which to observe (no high mountains). The U.S. and European telescopes in the Chilean Andes would be better suited to the task, don't you think?

      --

      Guns don't kill people -- people kill people.
      But the guns seem to help a bit. (apologies to Eddie Izzard)
  106. Re:AHHH! by evilempireinc · · Score: 1

    better start looting now I guess

    --
    we can rebuild this sig. we have the technology
  107. The Torino Scale by mdw2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The torino scale is designed more for the general public. While the Palermo rating for this asteroid is now at -.14, which doesn't make it COMPLETELY unlikely, the Torino scale for NT7 is a 1 (maximum). Here is the definition of a 1 on the Torino Scale

    Events Meriting Careful Monitoring
    (Green Zone)

    1

    The chance of collision is extremely unlikely, about the same as a random object of the same size striking the Earth within the next few decades.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  108. Re:Petition NASA! Blast it out of the way now! by swillden · · Score: 2

    ...deride...

    I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  109. or, alternatively... by zCyl · · Score: 2

    well i was caught in a llama stampede when i was younger, so anyone within a 1000 mile radius of me might wanna consider moving...

    Couldn't you do us all a favor and just move to someplace remote in 16 years? I'm sure we could all chip in and buy you a nice hard hat.

    1. Re:or, alternatively... by ThatTallGuy · · Score: 1
      Couldn't you do us all a favor and just move to someplace remote in 16 years?
      ... like Farside? :)
    2. Re:or, alternatively... by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we could all chip in and buy you a nice hard hat.

      He could move to the Austrailian outback, and we could buy him a bunch of pillows to cover his trailer.

  110. scarier things to worry about by siliconwafer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a lot more worried about the asteroids that are discovered just AFTER missing earth. :-/

  111. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by t0qer · · Score: 2

    Damn you!

    Now the corporations monitoring my transmissions won't use my idea of patenting astroid deflection technology because of your comment! Curse you and your kind!

    Time to go roll up a tin foil hat!

    --Toq

  112. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    17 year lead time? Sure. We went from 0 to the moon in 1/2 that time. Granted, it was a little tiny ship, and all they did was collect a few rocks, but faced with extinction by a 2km rock? No problem

    We'd only get one shot, but I think it could be done. Nudge, crack, something.

  113. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by WEFUNK · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone that figured out a real nice way to make these NEO rocks bounce, blow up, deflect, time phase shift, or tractor away from the earth could pull some mass patents on that and laugh all the way to the bank.

    Well, that's just the problem with our outdated patent system. Not enough incentive for developing killer astroid deflection systems. Before you get the chance to make your royalties, you find out the end of the world is just past your expiration date and those damn generic solutions and open source hackers are already waiting in the wings to save humankind for basement bargin prices. If you want to make any money at all you've pretty well gotta tie up your application for as long as possible and then slap injunctions on all the would-be good samaritan heroes with some killer submarine claims. We can only hope that they'll increase the term for anti-apocalyptic devices - otherwise I just can't think of any incentive to innovate.

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
  114. Swooosh! by eekDude · · Score: 1

    That sound you just heard were the swag of doomsday websites changing the predicted date of apocolypse from 2003 to 2019. ;)

  115. LLama Dust by t0qer · · Score: 2

    which means it shouldn't bump getting run over by a llama off your list of worries.

    Yeah but I don't want to be inhaling LLAMA DUST because all the LLAMA'S were turned into a fine white powder from the heat of the impact.

    That would even further our trade deficit with the countries bordering the Andes with white powder like substances. Columbia, Peru, lotta white powder (probably cut with llama ash) comes from there already.

  116. Everyone is doing their part. Are you? by SeanWithoutPants · · Score: 1

    We thought there might be a Brain Bug on P...

    (please forgive me if somebody already fulfilled the obligatory Starship Troopers quote)

  117. About that Graphic by DoorFrame · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't worry about the alarmist graphic. You'll note that they BBC online site uses that "giant asteroid destroying the Earth" image every second on third asteroid story they run. Here's a few recent favorites with the scary image:

    Asteroid Impact Centre Site Selected
    Earth at Lower Risk of Impact
    UK Centre to Study Asteroid Threat

    So, yeah, basically you should ignore that image. It's not related to the story in any but the most basic level; it's a picture of an asteroid hitting the Earth... a stock one.

  118. Um, I don't think so by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    If the USA take care of this they will do it to save there own skins. The rest of the world can safly say "No, won't pay". For the USA to survive they HAVE TO DO IT, what are is the USA going to do? Only deflect the bit of the rock thats going to hit it... ?

  119. Serious Threath by Sarin · · Score: 2

    I read at highest scores first. The thing that strikes me is that everybody's been moderated to funny sofar.
    What if a big-ass meteorite was really heading into a collision-course with our planet. I'm pro-post-acopoliptic-minded, but such a thing would mean slashdot won't be the same, that's a shame. So please take it a little bit more serious, cause such a thing is inevitable in the end.
    What would happen if, say China, would take away this threath by nuking it. We all read past episodes didn't we?
    My thought is if there's a threath like this it's going to be a boxingmatch between the most powered governments at that time,
    , they are just there to pull out their muscles to show how easy it is to take care of such a threath. It's not more than a marketing stumt that's been bit on the expensive side.
    The UN will follow the country that saved us everbodies asses, not for these reasons, but because of they always follow the strongest leader. Even the people who found out about it are going to be heroes..
    What do you expect if this were true?

    1. Re:Serious Threath by Wouter+Van+Hemel · · Score: 1

      boxingmatch between the most powered governments

      I don't really believe your boxing-match theory. I think when something like this will happen, a true and direct danger for the planet - not a horror story with a funny picture - it will be dealt with in a global way, and will rather unite people because it will make them focus on the 'common enemy' rather than their petty differences.

      Essentially, if we can conquer it, it will benefit mankind. And even more if we can't, depending on how negative your worldview is.

  120. Me thinks the poster had too much... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

    "...run over by a llama..." ...LLLLLLLLLLAMATRON!

    Sure wish Minter would port this gem -- not only was it fun, but absolutely hilarious to watch and the sounds, the sounds!. Llamatron would be a great game to play whilst waiting to get bonked by a 2km rock.

    Guess I'll have to do the Atari ST emulation setup again. Anyone know where to get the TOS ROMs file?

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    1. Re:Me thinks the poster had too much... by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      Seen this?

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    2. Re:Me thinks the poster had too much... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      Woo, interesting, thanks! Looks like Jeff is alive and well and, well, wooly as ever.

      DLed the TOS ROM file and STonX last night, hoping to get a Llamatron fix today. Love the sound effects of that game. Funny, funny stuff, fur sure.

      Thanks again!

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  121. NT7, NT and YEARS before crashing? paradox... by tcc · · Score: 2



    NT7, 16 years before crashing?
    ha.. haha.... bwahahahahha. Good one Slashdot, you made my day :)

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  122. Crisis in Washington by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 5, Funny

    After a brief press conference today, president George W. Bush was seriously mauled, when he declared war on The Rock, actor/wrestler Dwayne Johnson, which resulted in a surprise drop kick attack followed by a head butt and a pile driver by the professional wrestler, before White House Spokesperson Ari Fleisher managed to stop laughing out loud and informing the press and Dwayne Johnson that the President meant " a rock" and not "" The Rock". President Bush was rushed to the local hospital where doctors feared severe brain damage, but concluded that "there was nothing there to begin with, so it couldn't be hurt anyhow".

    The President later appologised for his mistake blaming it on terrorists who had sabotaged his statement.

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:Crisis in Washington by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      well I don't have mod points, but you made my evening, thanks

    2. Re:Crisis in Washington by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      Thank you - it makes me feel better knowing that I do, in fact, have a sense of humour. Besides, I had 50 karma-points, now I just have an Excelent karma.

      Too bad I can't say that about my sex-life.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  123. If we surrender now... by Scoria · · Score: 1

    ... then the asteroids have already won!

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  124. A solution! by anaesthesia · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps a group of interns will make off with it, eliminating the threat and saving planet Earth...

  125. What's the chance of the asteroid hitting us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So, their error is tens of millions kilometers, or several 10^10 meters. The radius of earth is roughly 10^6 meters. The chance of the asteroid hitting us with this data is proportional to the AREA, which means the ratio of these quantities squared. So the chance is (10^6/10^10)^2 = 10^-8, which is 0.000001%. I wonder if I have a better chance of winning the lottery?

  126. Problem Solved by The+Dobber · · Score: 1

    Couldn't we just unleash those 4 NASA interns on this issue?

    In a couple of weeks a NASA spokeman could say something along the lines of "We put two an two together. There was a big asteroid heading towards earth. Now theres a big asteroid for sale on Ebay. Problem solved"

  127. Re:Petition NASA! Blast it out of the way now! by sconeu · · Score: 2

    I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    INCONCEIVABLE!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  128. Hummmm by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    I bet this would make for a great movie plot.

  129. Asteroid!? How pathetic, try a SUPERNOVA! by portege00 · · Score: 1

    Considering that we could be fried by a white dwarf accumilating mass from a nearby star, causing it to go supernova, I think a continent is the least we could lose:

    http://www.cosmiverse.com/news/space/space05230202 .html
    http://www.dispatch.co.za/2002/05/24/features/DU CK .HTM

    Ever put a bug in a microwave? MUAH!

    --
    Trolls make great pets. Adopt one today!
  130. Earth is a giant puddle. by percey · · Score: 1

    Okay everyone uses the same damn graphic to depict asteroid-enduced armageddon. Is the atmosphere really so similar to the pond down the street? Will the earth really resemble that at the point of impact if I were watching some point out in space? While this rock is 2 kilometers wide, the picture depicts something the size of Texas, if I'm not mistaken. So when mir crashed into the sea did it produce a similar 'cannonball' effect? This to me is just the epitome of embellishment. And besides, I'm sure that by 2019, the resources on this planet will be so depleted that we'll actually welcome the additional iron this will bring in.

  131. Re:Send Up MS by orkysoft · · Score: 2

    Well, it's called NT 7, so you have a point.

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  132. Offtopic: your sig by naasking · · Score: 1

    Using unrealistic extremes to make an idea sound moronic makes you a shithead. Think first.

    It's a fallacy of logic called "excluded middle" (considering only the two extremes in a range of possibilities); a common failing of those who do not understand how to construct a logical arugment. See the above link for a list of other common logical fallacies.

    1. Re:Offtopic: your sig by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      heh thanks dude. Interesting read. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  133. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  134. Palermo scale by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    It doesn't look so bad. -0.14 on the Palermo Scale (recently downgraded?).

    You mean slashdot-like moderators can save us from asteroids just by modding the rock down?

    I'm impressed!

    Better a rock than me.

  135. All I can say is... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 2

    time to go insainly into debt!

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  136. Obligatory by MartianKillerBarbies · · Score: 1


    A llama bit my sister once...

    --

    "I am not a shrimp - I am a King Prawn! Pepe, "Muppets in Space"
  137. well too bad by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 2

    The US government thinks the "war on terror" is more important than the space program. It's too bad the only country with the technological power to stop worldwide destruction is bent on causing it.

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
  138. moving in space by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Regarding the title, "A rock moves in space".

    Moving in space is relative. Relative to the earth, *every* rock in space is moving (unless maybe there is something in those Lagrange points, or whatever you call them.)

    Further, the solar system is orbiting around the galactic center, and the galaxy (Milky Way) is moving toward the Virgo Cluster of galaxies.

    Personally, I don't want to go the the Virgo Cluster. Too many galaxies there to bump into and trigger nasty big-star supernovas in the process. But I have no choice in the matter.

    Damned gravity.

  139. Purple scarves and Reeboks, anyone? by small_dick · · Score: 2

    Oh boy, here we go again.

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
  140. A real threat we would never be told about by zaqattack911 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When/if this becomes a confirmed earth course, you can rest assured that the experts would never go public with it.

    Last thing people want is a whole continent of people on the run.

    1. Re:A real threat we would never be told about by anaesthesia · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'll bet the last thing people want is a whole continent of -llamas- on the run..

  141. Re:So has anyone called Bruce Willis yet? by paganizer · · Score: 1

    ...but he didn't let it stop him or ruin his day.

    --
    Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
  142. Earth would have been saved... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 2

    by the fifteen year asteroid annihilation project but the asteroid killer satellite was destroyed when it slammed into the asteroid. Apparently calculations were done based on feet instead of meters.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  143. 2002-NT7 update by chongo · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here are a few useful tidbits of info:

    2002-NT7 was discovered 9-Jul-2002

    There have been 102 observations (as of 8 hour ago) up thru 22-Jul-2002

    Radar images show that the object is between 2 and 2.1km in size. The mass is about 1.1e13 Kg. This is somewhat light for an asteroid of this size. This suggests that it may belong to the "pile of compressed rock" set as opposed the more solid "iron chunk" types.

    Impact speed is high, about 28.5 km/s. This speed is due to the nearly "head on" approaches for most of the close approaches.

    There is too little data and some of the observations may suffer from systematic errors. So over the next week or two the odds of impacting will change.

    Currently the odds of being hit by 2002-NT7 is about 1 in 100,000. The problem comes from how Earth deflects it during some of its close-by approaches.

    The orbit of 2002-NT7 takes about 837 days. The path takes out as far as Mars and just inside Earth's orbit.

    Close approach dates are:

    • Feb 1, 2019
    • Feb 1, 2035
    • Feb 1, 2051
    • Feb 1, 2060
    • Feb 1, 2067
    • Feb 1, 2078
    • ... and 7 years thereafter ...

    The odds, given the current limited observations, of impacting us 2019 thru 2051 are slim. The real problems show up in the 2060 and every 7 years after that. Small changes due to the close passes in 2019 thru 2051 make it hard to pin down later on.

    If this rock hits the earth then our way of life as we know it would surely end. Such an impact would be on par (but somewhat less) with the impact that ended the Dinosaurs 65 million years ago.

    It is not known where on earth it might impact. Too early to tell. Not that is matters for a rock of this size ... anyway on early will suffer sooner or slightly later.

    Looking at the raw data: when one tosses out one set data (all from the same source) that seems to have a systematic error: then things get worse. That is, the limited data minus this one source suggests that the odds of being impacted on or after 2060 are much more likely. But again, more independent observations are needed before one can say all this with more certainty.

    IMHO: 2002-NT7 does not have much of a chance to hit us before 2060. From 2060 on, things get really ugly.

    Stay tuned ...

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
    1. Re:2002-NT7 update by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Currently the odds of being hit by 2002-NT7 is about 1 in 100,000

      For those of you playing at home, those odds are about 70 times better than the advertised odds of winning the Washington State Lottery.

      Think about that next time you plop down your dollar for a Lotto ticket.

      Buy asteroid collision insurance with it instead. :)

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    2. Re:2002-NT7 update by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Buy asteroid collision insurance with it instead. :)

      I agree with your point, but I can't help quibbling with your analogy. It'd still rather have the lottery ticket. The collision insurance is a much better deal, but how are you going to spend it? :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:2002-NT7 update by jafac · · Score: 2

      I have a "good question" - if it seems to come around on Feb 1 every 8-12 years or so, how often has it come close in the past?

      I'd also like to coin a nickname for this rock - "groundhog" - because it's close to Feb 2, and if it hits earth (sees it's shadow) - it's going to burrow back into the ground, and we'll have six more YEARS of winter. . . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:2002-NT7 update by chongo · · Score: 2
      A "backward" search is being conducted with people looking thru photo databases and plate stacks for an earlier sighting of 2002-NT7. As the orbit becomes more well defined, this task will become somewhat easier.

      The same 2060 error problem exists for backward tracing into the mid 1900's, BTW.

      It is possible that the orbit has shifted recently, perhaps due to a close pass with Earth or some other unknown object.

      Another object, 2002-CU11 (0.83km in size, with a 125 second (in time) miss of the earth in 31 Aug 2049 if I recall correctly) has not shown up on previous photos where it should have been. It has a 31 Aug 2080 close pass that should prove "interesting". We know of photos taken at the right time by scopes that should have picked up 2002-CU11 on a previous pass. It was not there. It is possible that the photo is flawed at that point. It is possible that 2002-CU11 has a "not so shiny" (low albedo) side that was rotated toward the camera. It is possible that 2002-CU11's orbit shifted/altered by some close encounter with Earth or other unknown object in the recent past.

      It would be nice to know more of 2002-CU11's past. FYI: 2002-CU11 is the other object that rates a 1 on the Torino Scale. I.e., 2002-CU11 is in a similar risk class to 2002-NT7.

      --
      chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  144. wow by waspleg · · Score: 1

    my birthday is february 1st

    looks like it will be another very merry unbirthday when i turn 49

    of course i'll probably have died from one of the other 300 apocalyptic visions before then

    (planet x? 2012? infected hangnails?)

  145. Asteroid Collision? Consider Probabilities. by dameepster · · Score: 1

    Ok people... let's do some number crunching here. The asteriod is 2km wide, the distance between the earth and the sun is 149,597,890 km. the entire area that a asteriod could intersect the earth's orbit given by 4*pi*r^3 is 4.2071^25 km. The asteriods detected so far that intersect earth's orbit: 18,344 Diameter of earth: 12,756 km. Probability of an asteroid on a random trajectory hitting earth: 1/4.2071^25. Now let's look at this in perspective people! 1/4.2071^25. is VERY SMALL NUMBER. Obviously asteriods will want to be swayed into a orbital plane by the gravitational effects of the sun but who CARES? Think small number. Think low probability. If it orbits earth every 837 days and we have 17 years before impact (if it does impact at all), That reduces the probability even more. Stop thinking of the solar system as a simple thing. It isn't! Each planet has it's own gravity well and can change another object's trajectory easily. We don't have the computing power nor the time to catalogue all of the gravity wells to produce a perfect solar system model so that 17 year prediction is going to be INNACURATE! My simple message to people that are getting scared: don't. Everyone makes mistakes, even us scientists. Also don't believe everything the newspaper says, we don't need a world panic. Now excuse me I have to go outside and try to get a llama to run over me. SOURCES: The Ever Faithful Google http://neat.jpl.nasa.gov/

  146. LOL graphics by Snafoo · · Score: 2

    Sorry, but this has to be one for NTK's habitual BBC graphics mock-fest. The asteroid depicted is somewhat larger than Earth's moon.

    --
    - undoware.ca
  147. No worries.. I think not. by YT · · Score: 1


    This should serve as a wake up call. I mean come on, even if they confirmed it tomarrow that it is going to hit. Would 15 years be enough time to come up with a solution? The way everything because political and environmental (damm environmentalists). We'd be very lucky if we could get any kind of plan put into action.

  148. It's not an asteroid, it's the vogons. by wally+the+wobbly · · Score: 1

    Earth needs to be destroyed to make way for the hyperspace bypass.

  149. NT7??? by kpansky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When will Microsoft learn... Here's an excerpt from some computer magazine's review of the new "enhanced" version of NT... "In one review the editor had this to say about Microsoft's new version of WindowsNT: "All in all it was a massive undertaking. Massive in scale. It ran quite fast in all test's, giving a maximum of 28km/h (kilo-mips/hertz). But when it crashes... it takes most everything down with it....""

    --

    --Kevin
  150. We already crashed... :) by aralin · · Score: 2

    I looked at the simulation at NASA and as far as I am concerned, Earth already crashed with this rock at 1st February 1980. It was about 20 times closer to Earth than it is supposed to be in 2019.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    1. Re:We already crashed... :) by A+Swing+Dancing+Dork · · Score: 1

      Looks like feb 3rd by my java execution.

  151. good grief by stiefvater · · Score: 1

    the chances of us getting hit by a sizable asteroid are almost nil. can slashdot PLEASE show some scientific common sense and NOT perpetuate the hysteria?

  152. I'm another person... by inertia187 · · Score: 1

    ...in the "I wouldn't worry" camp. But if you *like* worrying, take a look at all the other objects out there:

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  153. funniest thing I've heard all day by zbuffered · · Score: 2

    Could someone please mod this up?

    --
    Synergy is your friend
  154. Your nation salutes you by dswensen · · Score: 2

    Yeah. Your sacrifice will not be forgotten.

    1. Re:Your nation salutes you by Spencerian · · Score: 2

      That's because we'll record it for streaming broadcast over the 'net...

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  155. It's risk * consequences stupid. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

    Well the consequences of being hit by a lama are not as severe as billions of deaths and an potential ice age. When you multiply the risk by the consequences maybe there's room for some prudent concern over this rock. Divide by the cost of doing something about it to figure out if you should take action. Right now they're observing to see if they can reduce the error in the projected orbit to see if it really is on target for Earth. That seems like the right course of action. I'm not losing sleep over this yet but I want to know where that rock is headed.

  156. Lies, lies... by psyconaut · · Score: 2, Funny

    The asteroid is actually stationary and peaceful. *We're* going to slam into it...and the World's Governments are trying to cover-up this earthly act of terrorism.

    -psyco

  157. Palermo Scale isn't so small after all by jdhouse4 · · Score: 1

    Also mentioned in the BBC article is that 2002 NT17 is the first body ever given a positive Palermo technical scale. That is bad enough new in-of-itself.

    Though I'm sure future observations will show that NT17 will miss us, what if they don't?

    Errors in observations can sometimes have a way of cancelling each other out so that at the end of the day the result that was error-prone is the same as that which is error-free.

    --
    Let us go to the stars, dream new dreams, and renew the embers of hope that have long since grown cold.
  158. Who thought up the name? by serutan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know which is more scary -- the idea of an asteroid hitting the Earth, or the name "NT7".

  159. Wishful thinking.. by hussain · · Score: 1

    I hope to god it hits Quebecc.

  160. According to NASA.. by ZillyMonk · · Score: 1

    NASA's NEO program currently states that NT7 has a .00001 chance of striking Earth at all, and a .000052 chance of specifically hitting us in 2017. Of course, the calculations will be refined as time passes, but from my first looks at the slim probabilities, it doesn't seem like it will be much of a problem. The only difference seems to be that it is slightly more likely to hit than previously discovered NEOs.

  161. Futurama Reference by minh7749 · · Score: 1

    In futurama the air pollution was so bad that the meteor burned up before hitting earth.

    Gentlemen, start you SUVs!

  162. The GOOD news by beh · · Score: 1

    Well, the 32bit time_t might not actually NEED further change - current unix time, if I am not mistaken will be sufficient until 2038 or something. So it would last almost 20 years after "total destruction".

    In that case, this might be the first computer "assumption", that might prove sufficient in the long run - unlike the famous "640k will be enough for everybody"... ;)

  163. Only 2 km? by Perdo · · Score: 2

    Oh, that's just a little one.

    We'll just tag it and throw it back.

    Good thing we have a catch-n-release program in place.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  164. Take it down by loconet · · Score: 2

    Ok, Yes the probabilites of it hitting us are pretty slim. And as an earlier post mentioned, they're very slim before 2060. Probabilities of it hitting us increase after 2060.

    So, my question is .. with our *current* technology can we take this thing down (if it were closer than it is now ofcourse)?

    --
    [alk]
  165. Re:2002-NT7 update (clarification) by chongo · · Score: 5, Informative
    When I said:

    " Such an impact would be on par (but somewhat less) with the impact that ended the Dinosaurs 65 million years ago."

    The KT event asteroid that hit 65 million years and formed the Chicxulub crater ago was almost certainly larger. Estimates of that impactor have ranged from 4km to 18km in diameter with more recent evidence suggesting that the smaller size estimates may be more accurate. Others prefer the larger sizes. Even if they are correct and the KT-impactor was on the larger end of the scale, an impact of a 2km asteroid is no trivial matter.

    Assuming the same density, the ~2km 2002-NT7 has about 1/8th the mass of KT impactor. Perhaps 1/10th the mass if 2002-NT7 turns out to be a lower than average density asteroid.

    When I said:

    " It is not known where on earth it might impact. Too early to tell. Not that is matters for a rock of this size ... anyway on early will suffer sooner or slightly later."

    I should have said:

    " It is not known where on earth it might impact. Too early to tell. Not that is matters where a rock of this size hits. No matter where it hits, civilization will suffer sooner (i.e., near the impact) or later (i.e., somewhere else on the earth)."

    I want to repeat that the chance of impact prior to 2060, based on the current limited set of observations, is slim (1 in ~100,000 more).

    The chance of an 2002-NT7 impact after 2060 is uncertain. It is hard to estimate the location of 2002-NT7 on/after 2060 in part because of the 4 prior close approaches and in part because positions become more uncertain as time goes on.

    It is common to consider asteroid positions 100 years or more in the future to uncertain enough as to not be useful to estimate impact risk. This 100 year uncertainty limit gets shorter when one throws in 1 or more close approaches.

    While 2002-NT7's orbit position will become better defined with additional data, the risk assessment of the 2060 pass (and beyond) will remain more uncertain for some time. Time (and more accurate observations) will tell how much the next generations will have to worry or not about 2002-NT7.

    IMHO, there is nil chance of an impact by 2002-NT7 before 2060. The trend / perturbations on 2002-NT7 suggest that things could get ugly later on. Monitoring of 2002-NT7 over time, plus improved orbit models will tell how much future generations will need to worry about an impact >= 2060.

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  166. destruction of the asteroid via nuclear means by lingqi · · Score: 3
    a lot can be said; but for starters -- learn about nukes before anything else:

    check it out here

    look at the "blast" heading -- this is mostly what we are concerned with. (i linked to a higher level of the hiarchy in case anyone is interested in the other effects as well.

    anyway... you can see from the data that on earth, one megaton bomb can devastate a radious of ~3km -- which is already larger than the asteroid... but i digress, and will try to look at this systematically

    1) delivery of the weapon

    this is probabbly the most no-brainer of the whole deal. all current ICBMs go into sub-orbit already anyway, strapping a few boosters onto them for escape velocity should not be a big problem.

    it is useful to note that the asteroid will be a threat even if no impact occurs on 2019; in fact it would be a much larger threat down the line. however, the frequent encounters with it in the near future gives up plenty of time to approach it and take action.

    2) effective-ness of the weapon

    this is somewhat harder to determine. see -- the problem is that all of our data on nuclear weapons is earth-based; i.e in a atmospheric environment. -- the 3km effective radius is based on this fact as well -- the destruction is not from the blast of the weapon -- but instead the sudden compressiong / decompression of the atmosphere that transmit the detonation energy to do the destruction. if the asteroid is indeed loosely packet -- much of the energy will just escape; while if the asteroid is solid-packet -- the bomb may not be powerful enough to break it all the way apart.

    before we go further -- it is very obvious that the bomb(s) need to be deeply implanted inside the asteroid for maximum effective-ness.

    the best scenario to hope for is that the asteroid have a large ice content. the vaporization of the ice would then be the medium of energy transfer -- breaking apart the asteroids into chunks that the earth's atmosphere can handle - which is probabbly the best we can hope for.

    similar things can happen with solidified CO2 / methane / whatever. but we won't know about the asteroid's contents until later (more observations).

    the good news is that if the asteroid was ever broken apart -- the gravitational force between the pieces should be small enough that they won't meaningfully get back together.

    3) possible hiccups

    the fact is that simply not enough is known about the behavior of nuclear weapons in vacuum -- which is both very cold, and lack the aforementioned energy transfer medium. so it may be that the weapon is actually quite in-effective in space. furthermore, depending on nuclear bombs to vaporize a whole asteroid is only a dream -- nuclear weapons destroy via shockwaves, and the thermal energy is actually comparatively low for what we need to accomplish.

    this basically lead to the fact that if we press the red button, the bomb goes off, and nothing happens to the asteroid except a shockwave rings through its structure but it remains intact.

    moreover -- drilling 1km down on an asteroid in as un-proven technology at best -- so there may be tons of problems there.

    4) some alternatives

    besides straight-up disintergration of the asteroid, there can be other things to try, for example, if you insert bombs in a planar fashion - it *may* be possible to break the asteroid into two or more chunks -- and if it is properly calculated -- it should be possible to get the thing either crash into mars, or get into earth orbit. (on a side note -- this would be very cool -- space elevator baby) and the smaller chunk can be much more easily broken down by nuclear means. (this is assuming the asteroid is a fairly rigid body of iron, etc etc.

    i had some other points -- but since this *might* be the end of the world after all -- i am going to go out and try to get laid now.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:destruction of the asteroid via nuclear means by Detritus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nuclear weapons have been tested in space. You can't use the ground-based effects data to predict their behaviour in space. A nuclear weapon can be treated as a black body radiator with peak output in the soft x-ray range. The thermal and blast effects seen on Earth are due to the fact that the atmosphere is relatively opaque to soft x-rays. This causes an absorption-emission cycle that produces a fireball and converts the soft x-ray emissions into infrared and visible light plus a shockwave created by the superheated air.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:destruction of the asteroid via nuclear means by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      "Nuclear weapons have been tested in space." Excuse me? Is this a typo, or have I missed something?

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    3. Re:destruction of the asteroid via nuclear means by Detritus · · Score: 2

      You missed something. Nuclear weapons were detonated in space by the United States in the test series Argus and Starfish. The USSR also tested three weapons in space.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:destruction of the asteroid via nuclear means by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Yup, 466 miles sure sounds like space to me. OK, I've learned something (Every day, in every way, I'm getting better and better!)

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  167. DNF by decaying · · Score: 2, Funny

    quoteth : "On the other hand, announcing a product 17 years before it hits, come on, that's not really serious, even by NT's standards."

    The following story will be on /. :

    Duke Nukem Forever Released!
    Posted by CmdrTaco'sKid on Thursday January 31, @10:00
    from the just-in-time dept.

    An anonymous submitter writes " 3Drealms have finally released Duke Nukem Forever, go grab it quickly....
    A article on NYTimes (DNA sample required) quotes the release manager Zarquon saying "Am I too late?"
    No word on a Linux port yet... but we can hope"
    --
    ----- One piece short of Legoland
  168. Historical data by numo · · Score: 1

    Detailed calculations of NT7's orbit suggest that this asteroid already has impacted the Earth three times in the past, the last one being Mar 2, 1997 ... oops, all continents still here? Guess we should upgrade those Pentiums.

  169. Not a Earth buffer, more accurate predictions by chascarrillo · · Score: 1

    Right now the orbital data that we have for the object isn't good enough to exclude an Earth impact. Once we get a good number of observations over a period of time - and preferably find the object on older pictures - we'll narrow down the possibilities of its orbit. Right now there's enough uncertainty about the orbit that there's a greater chance of it missing us than hitting us. The Earth's magnetic field wouldn't push it away, but various gravitational effects between now and 2019 could change the expected path of the asteroid.

    1. Re:Not a Earth buffer, more accurate predictions by n-baxley · · Score: 2

      So currently there is a better chance of it hitting us because there is a wider number of possible oribits. Once we have fewer possible orbits, there is a worse chance that one of them will hit us. Good explanation. Thanks.

  170. Do You mean Wondow$ NT7? by sigxcpu · · Score: 1

    That must be more then 0.14 on any damage scale, metric or not.
    (I know It woun't be here untill 2119 at least.)

    --
    As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
  171. A gift from the heavens by A+Swing+Dancing+Dork · · Score: 1

    Why would we want to destroy this perfectly good rock? Okay, so it might end life in 1 of 7 continents... but if we could pull it into orbit using some nukes, some rockets, or maybe a few tricked out solar sails + 30 years, we would have a great resource. Talk about space stations, hotels and space commerce, just to be able to use matter in space and not have to pay to get it up there would be worth it!

    I read that this rock is mostly just that, rock. Still... there must be some metal in there. There should be some other uses that you guys could think of right?

    Delta flight 1024 leaving NY, NY for Lunar base Echo via "The Rock" is now boarding.

    Giovanni
    But officer there is no way this car could even approach c.

  172. Look on the bright side by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember all that fuss and bother about Y2K? Remember the Unix crowd talking about having a similar problem in 2038 when the epoch rolls over?

    Suddenly it doesn't seem like much of a problem anymore, does it?

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  173. What a birthday party! by Zaphy42 · · Score: 1

    Fantastic! I'm going to be hit by a big rock on my 43rd birthday! ;)

    Still, I suppose it's an unusual way to go...

  174. The Aliens and the RIAA by Cef · · Score: 2

    I told the RIAA that they'd piss the Aliens off with all this MP3 buisness, but did they listen? Nooooooo!!!! Now look what happens.

  175. Imagine... by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Leonid cluster of these!

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  176. no! it's too early... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

    well, not for the sex with Liv Tyler part, but wait 17 more years before you round up the hooligans. gotta make it dramatic, you know? someone's gonna want the rip-off-movie rights.

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  177. Riddles and Asteroids oh my! by AmbientNightmare · · Score: 1

    Friggin riddles...I wanna go to bed....Friggin asteroids, I can't sleep!

  178. we want clinton back by matt4077 · · Score: 1

    I mean, clinton knows everything about a "deep impact" in little rock. Since this thing is just 2km wide, i would consider it a little rock.

  179. Look on the bright side, guys... by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    at least getting laid on Jan 31st, 2019 should be reasonably easy.

  180. Re:The Windows solution was first.. by JPriest · · Score: 1

    Sources tell me that the impact of the asteroid will be partly absorbed by an f-22 in the middle of an in-flight reboot.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  181. Re:Always With The Llamas... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

    Did you just propose making fun of penguins on /. ? Or even "picking on them" to use your own words? My, my...

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  182. That's why I don't enter the lottery! by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    I don't want to tempt fate and have an asteroid hit me/become victim of mad serial killer/get struck by lightning.

  183. s/silly foreign scientists/stupid American corps/ by rpjs · · Score: 1

    NASA, like the rest of the US federal govt, uses metric measurements. The problem was that the contractor, Lockheed IIRC, was using imperial.

    Insert obReference to Terry Gilliam's Brazil here.

  184. Metric Time by Myco · · Score: 2

    NASA: "Wait... is that 19 metric years?"

    1. Re:Metric Time by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      80 past 10 on February 1st, right? :)

  185. Unwarranted Futurama Reference by evilviper · · Score: 2

    Indenda: "We're loosing ships Lur. What are your orders?"

    Lur: "Increase speed, drop down, and reverse direction."

    Fry: "I've still got a trick or two up my sleeve. Watch as I fire upward through our own shields!"

    Bender: "He's a mad man... A MAD MAN!"

    (Yes, weak pretense to bring out the futurama quotes, but what else is new?)

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  186. thousands of miles big? by g4dget · · Score: 2

    With these stories, why do they alway show objects that are a couple of thousand miles large and plop into the earth like a pebble into a big pond?

  187. NT7... by helmutjd · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the most frightful disaster Earth has faced since NT4.

  188. The odds are all for us by Quantum+Singularity · · Score: 1

    Consider this: It is 95% likely that you are in the middle 95% of an event or thing's duration. That's 2.5% at the far ends. If you are witnessing it at the extreme 95% beginning, the future is 39 times longer than the past. At the other extreme, only 1/39th of the future remains. So using the factor of 39 rule, it is 95% likely that something will last more than 1/39th of its current duration, but less than 39 times its current duration.
    Let's apply this to Homo sapiens. Our current duration is about 200,000 years. So, it's 95% likely that we will live for more than 5,100 years, but less than 7.8 million years.

    The odds are all for us.
    Note: This concept was originally created by astrophysicist J. Richart Gott III.

  189. Mining opportunities? by h4mmer5tein · · Score: 1
    While mining this rock is a nice thought, especially as its mass suggests that lightweight hydrocarbons and other organics could make up the bulk of its mass, the practicalities are a fair way off yet.

    Right now we are looking at a Perihelion of 0.817 AU, which equates to ~122,221,459 Km. The distance to the moon is 385,000 Km. So its gonna be a fair way out for a while yet. IIRC the last time we went to the Moon it took about 10 days to get there. Its gonna take a hell of a lot longer to get to this rock.

    Ok, in a few years it will be getting closer but right now theres not really much to do about it except talk. Reaching it wont be practical, even with better technology, for at least another 15 years yet. Given the current state of Nasa funding for deep space manned flight, I can't see anyone getting enthusiastic about this in Government. Probably the only way it would happen would be for private enterprise to figure a way to make it profitable to go there.

    OTOH it could just be a lump of mashed up rock with no redeeming features at all and not worth visiting. In which case I'm sure the US military would love to blow it up ;)

  190. Gotta watch those middles by Tony-A · · Score: 2

    Undistributed Middle
    All Russians were revolutionists, and all anarchists were revolutionist, therefore, all anarchists were Russians.

    1. Re:Gotta watch those middles by kmellis · · Score: 2
      It's not clear to me that the original poster knows if there's a relationthip or what that relationship might be of "excluded middle" to "Principle of the Excluded Middle", or to the error of an undistributed middle term in a syllogism.

      A little knowledge is a very dangerous thing.

    2. Re:Gotta watch those middles by naasking · · Score: 1

      The "undistributed middle" is not what I was referring to; is that what you were implying? Or were you suggesting I add it to the list? :-)

    3. Re:Gotta watch those middles by naasking · · Score: 1

      Rest assured, I know, and I understand.

    4. Re:Gotta watch those middles by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      You might add it to the list of all the other troubles in the middle.
      It was a wisecrack about the number of middling problems, noting one which was NOT in your list.

  191. It could be the bugs... by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    ... hurling asteroids at us! We must go their home planet and find the SMART bug as soon as possible.

    Hurry, before they get Argentina.. RICO!!!!!!!!!!

  192. In unrelated news ... by Tru7h533K3R · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has leaked to the media that they are currently planning publicity stunts for the far off release of thier next generation server operating system, this release will be the 7th iteration of thier NT platform. NT7, will hit the US approx first quarter of 2019 according to our sources.

  193. waiting for verification.. by schnippy · · Score: 1

    still under review:

    FIRST EVER POSITIVE PALERMO SCALE 'VIRTUAL IMPACTOR' ANNOUNCED - WITHOUT IAU REVIEW From Asteroid/Comet Connection, 23 July 2002 http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/news.htm

    Excerpted from CCNET
    http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/cccmenu.html.

    "It is interesting to note that NEODyS appear to have announced this first-ever positive Palermo Scale 'virtual impactor' without any formal IAU technical review. The IAU encourages such a review for any impact prediction that is at a level equal to or greater than zero on the Palermo Technical Scale (http://web.mit.edu/rpb/wgneo/TechComm.html)."

    the last dozen or so 'close calls' have been retracted within a few days as the rest of the scientific community catches up.

  194. Taco Bell by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean that Taco Bell will be putting another target out, and we all have a chance at getting a Free Taco?

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  195. Let me be the first to say... by vidnet · · Score: 1
    I call shotgun on the mars mission!

    My other .sig isn't funny either.

  196. 0.00% Chance. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    The threat is known, it's orbit watched and we have 60+ years to do something about it. Even with as little as 5 years and a more precise trajectory, I'm sure we could build something riduculously nasty to introduce it to... A government in panic mode can do a lot of things in that time, devoting all it's resources to survival.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:0.00% Chance. by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Even with as little as 5 years and a more precise trajectory, I'm sure we could build something riduculously nasty to introduce it to...

      Even assuming that does drop the chance to 0.00, it is still missing the bigger picture. The last close approach I read about on /. wasn't even noticed until about 2 days AFTER it nearly hit us.

      Welcome to the cosmic shooting gallery! Step right up! First shot is free! Win a teddybear!

      Me? I'm just here for the cotton candy.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:0.00% Chance. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      The threat is known, it's orbit watched and we have 60+ years to do something about it. Even with as little as 5 years and a more precise trajectory, I'm sure we could build something riduculously nasty to introduce it to... A government in panic mode can do a lot of things in that time, devoting all it's resources to survival.

      This is no more evident then the reconstruction of the Pentagon. It's pretty much complete by the way. Just saw it yesterday.

      --

      Gorkman

  197. Ridiculous photo/caption by jpellino · · Score: 2

    The rock in the photo is hardly 2km diameter - and apparently causing quite a splash of water from... oh, anyway.

    And the caption, "An asteroid could devastate the earth." is an unconnected hypothetical statement that was just as true when the BBC were first formed as it is today, tomorrow, or on Feb *2* 2019.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  198. About your sig by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2

    It should read
    One nation under God
    there is not comma there.

  199. Lemme guess... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    ... the asteroid is full of guys with sneaked box cutters...

    (Reposted, account being moderated into oblivion)

  200. Impact pic by texchanchan · · Score: 2

    All I see on the BBC story is a graphic showing intersecting paths. Maybe they changed it.

    For an excellent asteroid impact image, see this page with art by C. Crowley (my brother). Scroll about halfway down for the scary stuff captioned "A Hadean countryside. Here, a mountain ten miles tall falls out of the sky in an everyday Hadean event.
    Earth took hits like this much more frequently in the Hadean than it does today, but Hadean moments like this still happen on a regular basis.

    Chixulub Crater of Yucutan records a cosmic disaster everyone knows about. The large asteroid that struck Manson, Iowa, a few million years before that, must have certainly killed all life in central North America."

    1. Re:Impact pic by texchanchan · · Score: 2

      Oops, was looking at the wrong article. Here is the BBC's asteroid pic http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1640000/images/_1644 899_aster300.jpg

  201. Okayyy... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    Suppose it really ends up on a collision course. Now, we can do our best to nuke it off-course at least until passes through the Roche limit. Now, who foots the bill? Definitely, the US is going to insist that they only pay 5% of it, as this is their percentage of the world's population.

    But the rest of the world is gonna insist that they pay relative of the percentage of their wealth (wealth that, for the most part, has been sucked from the rest of the world anyways).

    Since it's gonna take a long time to resolve this, better start ASAP bickering that...

    (Reposted, account being moderated into oblivion)

  202. Bugs? by Noofus · · Score: 2, Funny

    This asteroid will hit Buenos Aries, and our new fascist government will blame it on evil, giant bugs from another planet (even though these bugs couldnt possibly have the technology to do something like this...you will see when we get there to blow them all up)...

    Oh wait, I've been watching too much sci-fi...

    Never mind...

    1. Re:Bugs? by Pxtl · · Score: 2

      Of course, the thing is that ever since that book was written, Buenos Aires is the traditional "City to Blow Up" in Sci-Fi, as a hat's off to Heinlen (even videogames like Star Control II do it).

      Kind of funny - half my family lives there.

  203. I told you so! by mwood · · Score: 1

    See! Didn't I say that we'd be glad some day that we learned to make fusion bombs? We've got 16-17 years to give this rock a better (for us) orbit.

    Now where did I put my Tom Corbett books?

  204. OK, you get started on the mineres by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Someone get me Liv Tyler, STAT!!!.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  205. Re:Finally. by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

    Personally, I would call it a decently large package. 2 km wide. And I mean, that's just the asteroid itself. Think about the box you'd have to put it in. Then a couple of hundred feet of bubble tape to prevent damage, and maybe some of those packing peanuts, and you've got one hell of a package.

    Just think of the postage.

    --
    With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
  206. what a great day by sabri · · Score: 1

    it will be for all those ugly nerds who once heared: "I will have sex with you on the last day of the earth".

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  207. hmmm... Mozilla... by Li0n · · Score: 1

    Mozilla will probably be 2.0 RC96

    --

    ~
    ~
    :wq
  208. Scarier than it is... Or not by BasicOp · · Score: 1

    That picture they have at the top of the article makes it look very scary... Thats not a 2km wide asteriod... its a MOON, this isn't something to worry about, I despise it when the news is blown out of proportion and exaggerated -- Something the BBC can be known for.

  209. Target wish list by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    Please nudge it towards one of the following (in order of preference):

    1. Los Angeles (esp Hollywood studios)
    2. Washington DC, preferably on "lobbyist day" (yah, hate to see the Air & Space museum go but sacrifices have to be made)
    3. Sen. Trent Lott's house
    4. Las Vegas (they killed the Colorado river for THAT?)

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  210. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by dylan_- · · Score: 2

    The cold hard fact is that if an asteroid wants to hit the earth it is going to hit the earth.

    It's inarguably true that suicidal, sentient asteroids would pose a major threat to life on earth...

    --
    Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  211. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by ubeans · · Score: 1

    Right. Let's install gigantic pinball flippers
    on the poles :)

  212. Re:Always With The Llamas... by colmore · · Score: 2

    I'm not exactly sure where it began.

    Maxis has had llama in-jokes in their games for a long time, and the WinAmp guys seem to have some sort o llama fixation as well.

    They're just funny animals.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  213. YES! by Quixadhal · · Score: 2

    This means we do NOT have to solve the 32-bit unix timestamp problem!

    Yay!

  214. Not to worry by Drakh · · Score: 1

    I'll recompile my kernel

    Asteroid support? Yes( ) - Module ( ) - No (*)

    Øyvind the wondersquid

  215. Losing sleep. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
    True fact: I'm going back to Peru in a couple weeks, to visit family.

    And now, I am worried about getting run over by a llama.

    Annoying Peruvian geek trivia: no one over the age of 10 actually rides a llama. Llamas are pack animals and won't carry riders. They spit, too. They will happily run over you without prompting, all by themselves.

  216. Re:Could be worse... by Alsee · · Score: 2

    Won't you feel like an ass when it misses?

    When I read that I couldn't help mentally linking "ass" with the idea of it actually hitting. That naturally brought Goatse to mind.

    Runs sceaming in horror as brain melts

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  217. Losing the object by GutterBunny · · Score: 2
    According to astronomers, NT7 will be easily observable for the next 18 months or so, meaning there is no risk of losing the object.

    Nasa, stardate: January 31, 2019.

    Joe: "Hey Bob, have you seen that big object that we thought was going to hit the earth tomorrow?"

    Bob points up.

    Joe: "Oh yeah"

    --
    managers...why god invented purgatory
  218. All I'm saying.... by until(0) · · Score: 1

    All I'm saying is that NERV better get some new Eva models produced, or the Angel inside that Astroid is gonna fuck us up mad crazy like.

    word.

    --
    -da5id
  219. We're saved.... by pdrome4robert · · Score: 1
    from all the C/C++ code that is going to crash New Years Eve 2038. I am so relieved :-)

    No matter how long it takes for a pessimists' predictions to come true, they will say "I told you so" when it does come true.

  220. Re:Planet X by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1

    An AC wrote:

    > Tilted Orbit?
    >
    > Passes between the Earth and Mars?
    >
    > And there not *exaclty* sure of it's actual orbit?
    >
    > Sounds like Planet X to me!

    Whether or not it is Planet X, it is definitely the handiwork of Monster Zero:

    Destroyer of Worlds,
    The Great Devil that comes from the sky,
    The King of Terror,
    The Strongest Foe,
    Guardian God of the Heavens,
    Mr. Mass Extinction Event himself:

    King Ghidora!

    We went through this with him last year. Last July, he tried to make himself some popcorn with an tiny asteroid and a corn field. Then he did his "King of Terror" bit until Mothra took away his Al Quada playmates. Then he personally took down a plane with windshear. He sulked for a few months, and just before his new movie ("Godzilla, Mothra, King Ghidora: Giant Monsters All-out Attack") came out in Japan, he put on a great Leonid display.

    We don't need to go through this again (except the Leonids, they were cool). Tristar, I would think it would be your patriotic duty to keep King Ghidora and Godzilla happy so they don't go on rampages in the real world.

    Please (re)release the following to DVD:
    Ghidrah, the Three-Headed Monster
    Monster Zero
    Mothra 3: King Ghidora Attacks

    And please, release this in US theaters (and properly advertise it) like you promised:
    Godzilla, Mothra, King Ghidora: Giant Monsters All-out Attack

    "All we have to worry about is to slay King Ghidora."
    Shouta, "Mothra 3: King Ghidora Attacks"

  221. yep... by di0s · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt that this Rock thinks we're all a bunch of Jabroni's

  222. MAFIA? by trex44 · · Score: 1

    Palermo? Torino? I smell the Mafia's hands behind this threat! :)

    --
    "I'll have a witty .sig next time, promise." :)
  223. AP knows their science! by jaydub99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the AP wire:

    Scientists said if it had hit a populated area, it would have released as much energy as a large nuclear weapon.

    Forgive my ignorance of modern scientific theory, but why does the density of people affect the amount of energy released? Would it have been less energy if it hit the ocean?

    Maybe there is some human fission reaction anticipated here? If so, I think I know how to solve our energy woes... It's time for Carousel. Renew!

    --

    Please mod me up. My grandma might not make it to the weekend and she always wanted me to hit karma cap.
  224. Spelling Nazi asks: How does one ass danger? by orichter · · Score: 1

    I did a doubletake when I read this, and though it was quite obvious on second reading that you meant assess, I had a nice grin in the meantime wondering how you might ass danger. Perhaps it's like Charades with your ass trying to mime danger, or perhaps the Palermo scale is simply a rating of how likely it is you need to bend over and kiss your ass goodbye. None the less, thanks for the grin :)

  225. Re:you, sir, are a moron by ehorizon · · Score: 1

    It's offical - M$ apologists have no sence of humor !

  226. Operation: Enduring Giant Space Rocks by DoctaWatson · · Score: 1

    "...and remember that if we are to show fear by changing our American way of life, the Giant Space Rock has already won."

    I can only hope that we act fast to make sure that the Giant Space Rock becomes part of the Axis of Evil.

  227. Too early to start packing by kavau · · Score: 1

    Until now, the scientists can only specify the Asteroid's position on February 1st 2019 within an error margin of several million kilometers. (Translation by me).

    That gives us a chance of less than one in a million of getting hit. So I guess it's a bit too early to take the next spaceship to mars and never look back.

    Kavau

  228. Yikes... by Morky · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to see a Beowulf cluster of these.

  229. My god the irony by Hardwyred · · Score: 2

    First NT3, then NT4 (without DVD support). Next Win2k (NT5?, with some DVD support). In 2019, MS releases NT7 and it destroys all of North America, but still with out really good DVD support.

    --
    www.linux-skunkworks.com
  230. If the aliens are running NT 7... by Futaba-chan · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...then can we send Jeff Goldblum to infect them with an Exchange virus?

  231. Even more critical.... by jmcwork · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can we make sure that Téa Leoni is near the impact site?

  232. Asteroid to hit tommorow by skintigh2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    December 1, 2017
    Reuters
    Today in the 17th year of the anti-terror extended presidency, Bush urged everyone on Earth to pray to Jesus to stop the asteroid. He blamed democrats for stopping all efforts to divert destruction but said he had faith everything would be "hunky-dorey."

    A summery of the anti-asteroid efforts are as follows:

    2002: Republicans reject idea that asteroids exist.

    2004: A bill funding more science is rejected as "pork barrel".

    2006: Republicans reject theorey asteroids have ever hit Earth in it's 4000 year history, and therefore never will.

    2008: Republicans admit asteroids may exist, but if one did hit the Earth it wouldn't be that bad.

    2010: Despite mounting evidence that the asteroid will have a direct hit, Bush rejects the science as "shakey and controversial."

    2012: UN resolution on asteroid vetoed by US as being too intrusive.

    2014: Senate plan to stop asteroid rejected by Bush as "too costly." Tax cut for rich is passed.

    2016: Emperor Bush rejects an internation coalition to stop the asteroid as "flawed."

  233. 2002-NT7 update as of 24-Jul-2002 16:00 UTC by chongo · · Score: 2
    5 more observations (now a total of 107 over 14 days and a few hours), plus a systematic error correction has changed things slightly.

    The good news: The Feb 1, 2035 and Feb 1, 2051 close approaches have moved far enough away to become a nil-hazard.

    The not-so-good news: The Feb, 1 2044 and Feb 1, 2053 passes have shifted from the nil-hazard to a close approaches. In the case of Feb 1, 2044 the miss is by about 86,900 km. In the case of Feb 1, 2053 the miss is about 30,600 km.

    The size estimate of the object has changed from 2.03km to 2.06km in diameter. The mass estimate has been upgraded from 1.1e13 kg to 1.2e13 kg.

    The bad news: The Feb 1, 2060 and Feb 1, 2078 approach continues to be a concern. With the data we have now the close approach on Feb 1, 2060 is only about 18,000 km (much closer than before). The Feb 1, 2066 miss distance has increased but the Feb 1, 2078 approach is about 18,800 km. But as I said before, future events will be hard to pin down until the 2019, 2044 and 2052 approaches become better understood.

    Overall the impact probability has changed from 1 in ~100,000 to 1 in ~6,600,000. The Palermo Scale has changed from 0.06 to -0.05. However the object remains 1 on the Torino Scale remains at 1.

    While the Earth's perturbation on the pre-2060 approaches has been reduced, 2002-NT7 still seems to settle into a 7 to 14 year close approach pattern post 2060.

    IMHO, now: 2002-NT7 is not a problem prior to 2060. On and after 2060 those passes could be a problem.

    We need more data and more time to improve the orbit models. Don't be fooled by those orbit calculators that you find in over the counter astro programs or on-line ones such as the supplied on the JPL web site. Those are good for most cases but fail when anything gets close or when one looks out farther in time. They simply do not have the precision needed to calculate such close approaches. To give you an idea of the precision: In the Feb 1, 2060 case a time error of only 550 seconds (1 part in ~3,200,000) is enough to convert the 18,000 km miss into an almost certain impact. And the uncertainly of Feb 1, 2060 makes it even harder to pin down Feb 1, 2078 and beyond.

    I'll post an update (as a reply to my initial 2002-NT7 update posting) if new observational data changes things again.

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  234. Terrorist? by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, this could definitely be considered anti-USA behavior. Maybe the FBI should investigate the individual who drew it. He's probably a terrorist.

    --
    To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
  235. It isn't rocket science... Oops. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    Actucally, this really isn't a huge challenge. We have the technology at every level to develope a weapon that will destroy a rogue asteroid.

    Design. We can not only land payloads on other planets, but achieve there orbits without much difficulty (relatively speaking). Hitting an asteroid using basic physics shouldn't be hard. It'd probably be wiser to assemble any Anti-Ballistic Event weapon in orbit. This will give it a greater endurance from it's propulsion system than from launching so deep within the Earth's gravity well. More endurance = greater in flight error tolerance if something should go amiss trajectory-wise. If we can put a giant space station in orbit, we can do this.

    Payload. So far, nuclear weapons are the payload of choice for an ABE Weapon, ie; We have the most experience in them and they have plenty of power. If you can dig massive craters with these, surely it'd do something nasty to a space rock, though I'm no nuclear weapons in a vacuume expert.

    Alternatives. Partical dispersion. Theory- A meteor burns up in the atmosphere because of it's speed and atmospheric friction. So our ABE Weapon is loaded up with sandbags... Yes, Sandbags. These will be dispersed directly in front of the incoming asteroid (collision course). Repeated assaults of this sort might have the same effect as an atmosphere, burning it up in a fasion.

    Yeah, you could also try the Armageddon approach, I guess. Not a huge fan of it, but there's no reason why it couldn't be done. That's what drones are for, personally. Any laser based weapon would have to be built in space to be even remotly effective (vaporize? And barely within current technology). Still, it's looking like nukes (which we have LOTS of) are the best bet. Heck, you could even attatch orbit-built solid and liquid boosters to it if you wanted to get fancy. On that note, a probe with a four or five weapons landing on it's flank, detonating simutaneously might just bounce it out of it's track even if destruction isn't outright. See? no problems ^__^

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:It isn't rocket science... Oops. by hage · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, are you going to land on/attach boosters to an object moving at 28km/s?

  236. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by jafac · · Score: 2

    On a scale of one to ten, in terms of difficulty:

    Locating an habitable world outside our own solar system, designing and building a large enough transport to support enough human, animal, and plant life for a long enough time to survive the journey and/or a faster-than-light drive technology, etc.
    Difficulty: 9
    (level of protection from asteroids: 100%
    level of protection from solar heat-death: 100% (repeat as necessary)
    level of protection from other threats such as plagues from alien pathogens, neutron stars, local supernovas, etc. : not all that good)

    Designing and building a transport infrastructure robust enough to move engineers, vast quantities of equipment and materials, and vehicles either being large enough to support rotational gravity, or some magical artificial gravity technology invented, perfected, and implemented, to be taken to Mars, (presumably the best candidate) in order to establish self-sustaining colonies, in order to produce enough climate change, in order to be able to sustain life long enough to establish a permanent effect on the climate (which would require constant effort to maintain, due to the solar wind's constant erosion and lack of a protective planetary magnetic field).
    Difficulty: 10
    (level of protection from asteroid impact: six of one, half dozen of the other, if Earth gets creamed, who's to say Mars wouldn't also?)
    (Level of protection from solar heat death: 0)
    (level of protection from other threats - compared to earth?: 0)

    Designing and building an infrastructure to create a vessel large enough (or again, artificial gravity) constructed to orbit at one of earth's lagrange points, overcoming hazards from space debris, radiation, lack of water and other resources, to support a large enough contingent of human, animal and plant life to sustain life indefinitely.
    Difficulty: 8
    (need I go over the pointlessness of the relative threats again?)

    Launching a large ion-propulsion unit into interplanetary space, equipped with solar panels for energy, rendevouz-ing at 28km/sec with a 2km asteroid, becoming secured to the surface through some claw-like mechanism, and operation low impulse thrust over long periods of time, perhaps getting periodic propellant resupply missions - in order to slow the asteroid's orbit enough that it drops away from the vicintity of earth's orbit, or perhaps, eventually into the sun.
    Difficulty: 2

    Taking any of the first three solutions, (or even the fourth) and applying the social complexities to the human element, including maintaining a stable political situation given the various social and religious backgrounds, and propensity for populations of people to not easily be controlled over long time periods - and obtaining a population that could survive for any length of time that would make it meaningful towards the goal of survival of the species.
    Difficulty: 11
    (ie. given how crazy and fucked up we humans are, I'm quite certain we're going to extinguish ourselves long before any silly asteroid has a chance).

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  237. Hmmm...I read a book about this... by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

    The asteroid is said to hit the earth in New Mexico...(and yes the rest of the world wil be overjoyed at finding such an easy way of gettin' rid of the US :P No Offence Intended of course ;)

    But do you remember what happend last time when a big asteroid hit earth?

    Exactly..the Dino's where whiped out!

    And to think the 4th of Feb is my birthday!

    Oh, wait, I know what to do REBOOT! :P

    --
    Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
  238. haha by MrClear · · Score: 1

    A lot of posts here were kind of funny, but that's a classic.

  239. No need to worry folks by LafinJack · · Score: 1

    By the time February 2019 rolls around we'll be on the other side of the Sun entirely, the asteroid will go right by us!

    --
    we are building a religion
    a limited edition
    we are now accepting callers
    for these pendant key chains
  240. Stock frenzy! by The_Guv'na · · Score: 1

    Ali's Hot Stock Tips!!!

    • Undergarment makers.

    • Holy scripture printers.

    • Religious TV channels.


    Click here to unsubscribe.

    Ali

  241. We *will* fry! by bombom · · Score: 1

    Reasons why we are gonna fry:

    1.) Bruce Willis and his crack crew of drillers will be too old to do this in 16.7 (approx) years.

    2.) NASA can don't basic math.

    Might as well start moving all my 401K to my Bunker Fund :)

    --
    IOException - Can't Speak
  242. Re:s/silly foreign scientists/stupid American corp by chrisos · · Score: 1

    Wasn't it the distinction between miles and nautical mies or was that another cock-up?

    IIRC 1 Nautical Mile = 1.1 Miles

    --
    If nature abhors a vacuum, why isn't there more dust in the world?
  243. /.ed the planet! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2


    Oh, my GOD! I got to the server, and there was no response.

    We're all going to die. /.ed to death.

  244. 2002-NT7 update as of 24 Jul 2002 22:00 UTC by chongo · · Score: 2
    We now have 113 observations spanning about 15 days 4 hours. These 5 new observations fit well with the other data and have helped improve the orbit model somewhat. The following relates to the model changes from 1600 UTC 2200 UTC:

    Not so good news: The odds of an impact prior to 2060 was 1 in ~6,600,000 and now is about 1 in ~4,500,000.

    The Feb 1, 2060 approach is now very close, only 3570 km! There is still a great deal of uncertainly. At 1 sigma, the margin of error is about +/- 29600 km.

    Sure, the center line of the model comes very close to the earth. And sure, the 1 sigma margin of error of the model paints a wide path that intersects the Earth. However the model relevance (i.e., how well does the orbit model match the real 2002-NT7 asteroid) is still in doubt and needs more observational data to refine it.

    To give you an example of how small effects can change the model: A 125 second model error, adjusted in the wrong way, out at Feb 1, 2060 (about 1 part in about 14,600,000) is all that it takes to turn a miss into an impact.

    At the risk of stating the obvious: Just because the orbit model draws a line thru your neighborhood doesn't mean that the Asteroid will follow the same path. We have to improve the model and validate it with direct and accurate observations over time before we can begin to place more trust in the model reflecting reality. So continue to pay your bills and refrain from end the world rioting. :-)

    For those who are keeping track. The following is the list of close approaches (according to the model):

    1. Feb 1, 2019 (distance: ~28500 km)
    2. Feb 1, 2044 (distance: ~91100 km)
    3. Feb 1, 2053 (distance: ~53500 km)
    4. Feb 1, 2060 (distance: ~3570 km)
    5. Feb 1, 2078 (distance: ~15900 km)
    6. with interesting passes every 7 to 14 years after that
      (your asteroid's mileage may vary :-))

    The Palermo Scale value has changed from -0.05 to -0.25. (A lower number means less risk) However the Torino Scale remains at 1. (A value >0 means there is something to worry about). The main reason for the Palermo scale drop is that there are fewer close approaches to worry about over the next 50 to 100 years. Fewer close approaches means fewer risky events. Fewer risky events in the next 50 to 100 years results in a lower Palermo value.

    IMHO, It is still the case that there is next to nil chance of impact before 2060. It is 2060 and beyond events that are of concern. It is the pattern of orbit adjustments at and beyond 2060 that may be of concern.

    p.s. My memory of the other asteroid that as a non-zero Torino value was bad. The other non-zero Torino risk object is the asteroid 1997-XR2 with a -2.44 Palermo Scale value and the impact odds of 1 in about 970,000. While better odds than 2002-NT7, it is smaller ... only 230 meters across. The impact energy of 2002-NT7 (if it were to hit) is some 3333 times as great as 1997-XR2. And while an impact of 1997-XR2 (somewhere around June 1, 2101) would not be fun, it is does not have nearly the same potential impact as 2002-NT7.

    The other object on the hit parade that is being watched is 2002-NY40. However we only have 76 observations over 9+ days so things are still WAY WAY too early to tell or say anything. It has a -1.91 Palermo value and a 0 Torino value so far.

    IMHO, I would not be surprised to see the 2002-NY40 drop in the charts as the days go by.

    Well I have other work that I need to do, so it may be a day or so before I update things again ... unless something changes dramatically ...

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  245. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

    People of Earth: Do you hear those nukes, Earth Grazer? That's the sound of your death approaching...

    Asteroid: My name....is NEO!

    (boom)

    graspee

  246. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

    " Well, if some extinction level event was about to happen, I would expect all the well-connected people to raise a lot of cash in order to buy a lot of survival goods for their escape rockets, mile-deep bunkers, and what not."

    They can get the money back after the impact by selling bits of NT7 on ebay.

    Item: 58m Chunk of NT7 NO RESERVE!
    Current Price: 15,000 Eurobucks
    Buyer responsible for Shipping and Handling charges. Seller sends internationally.
    Note: I do not take paypal anymore!

    graspee

  247. Let's just hope... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2

    The estimate is done on one of those Pentium 1's with a FDIV malfunction. That way, not only will the asteroid crash into the sun, but by the time it does it will have crumbled and melted away into the size of a thimble.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  248. Ok, maybe not. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    I'd say match the velocity, but that is a healthy chunk of speed to dump from intercept to velocity matching. Ok, have the nuclear rockets aim for the flanks. I guess it's the easiest solution. But you're right. Velocity matching isn't exactly an economical easy fix.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Ok, maybe not. by Chiascuro · · Score: 1

      It's Easy!

      Slingshot round the moon!!!

      (Well it worked in the movie...)

      --
      I am a bomb technician, if you see me running - try to keep up.
  249. Re:Why isnt the world testing deflection technolog by WEFUNK · · Score: 2

    Right. Let's install gigantic pinball flippers
    on the poles :)


    Great idea! Better get going on your US patent app though - you've got one year to file. Of course, there'll be no incentive to use your gigantic pinball flippers anywhere outside the US since you've just given up your foreign patent rights through public disclosure... and you'd better hope for a good NEO scare in the next 20 years or so, otherwise you should sell them for missile defense before everyone and their brother are making gigantic pinball flipper knock-offs. Maybe if you register giganticpinballflippers.com...

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
  250. IANACM - but this looks highly questionable to me by KlausB · · Score: 1

    Its acronym time again !

    IANACM (I Am Not A Celestial Mechanic),
    but this:

    > 1.Feb 1, 2019 (distance: ~28500 km)
    > 2.Feb 1, 2044 (distance: ~91100 km)
    > 3.Feb 1, 2053 (distance: ~53500 km)
    > 4.Feb 1, 2060 (distance: ~3570 km)
    > 5.Feb 1, 2078 (distance: ~15900 km)
    > 6.with interesting passes every 7 to 14 years after that
    > (your asteroid's mileage may vary :-))

    looks highly questionable to me.

    This suggests that the asteroid, which according to the bbc article has an orbit that does not lie in the ecliptic plane, comes within less than 8 earth diameters on 5 occasions in less than ten 7-year periods.

    This would require two things:

    a) The period of the asteroid and the earth must be synchronized to a ratio of 3/7 to within less than app. 1 hour in 60 years - an accuracy of approximately 1:500000

    b) All those near flybys must not significantly alter the course of the asteroid. (comparison: geostationary satellite orbit is app. 35000km, and the satellite is deflected by 360 degrees in one day)

    I would expect the first flyby in 2019, according to the poster well within geosynchronous orbit, to change the course of the asteroid by something like 0.1 degree (the asteroid is app 10 times faster relative to the earth as the satellite).

    After that, the course has changed randomly and the speed has changed significantly (the swingby effect), so any synchronization that may have been there is lost. If we then have 4 more close flybys, the chances for that are more like 5 lottery wins in a row.

    Maybe there was just a decimal error in those calculations.

  251. Re:IANACM - but this looks highly questionable to by chongo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    KlausB asks:

    " This would require two things:

    a) The period of the asteroid and the earth must be synchronized to a ratio of 3/7 to within less than app. 1 hour in 60 years - an accuracy of approximately 1:500000"

    You are asking a good question. The reason why the close approaches occur on the same day of the year is because 2002-NT7's orbit is closest to Earth's orbit at one point. That point does shift around. The current model suggests the closest approach occurs at:

    1. Feb 1, 2019 12h UTC
    2. Feb 1, 2044 16h UTC (25 years, 4h later)
    3. Feb 1, 2053 0h UTC (9 years, -16h later)
    4. Feb 1, 2060 17h UTC (7 years, 17h later)
    5. Feb 1, 2078 5h UTC (18 years, -12h later)
    6. ... others with skips of 7 to 14 years +/- a few hours later

    The path of 2002-NT7 will next cross earth's orbit plane going upward at a point about 132.1708757 degrees from the Fall Equinox. Now 132.1708757 degrees / 360 degrees = 0.3671413214 of a circle. Using 365.2564 days (Earth's year), 0.3671413214 of a circle * 365.2564 days = about 134.1 days from the Fall Equinox. 134.1 days from Sep 23 (~06 hr UTC) lands one near 1 Feb.

    Take a look at this 2002-NT7 orbit diagram. The dark blue part of 2002-NT7's orbit is below Earth's plane. The light blue part is above Earth's plane. The yellow line from the Sun (red dot in center) going down and to the right is the 0 degree fall equinox line. The vertical yellow line, 132.1708757 degrees from the equinox line (as measured in the plane of Earth's orbit, not the plane shown on your screen) shows where 2002-NT7 crosses Earth's orbit plane. That crossing spot (the place where the dark/light parts of 2002-NT7's orbit meet near the yellow line), you will notice, is very close to Earth's orbit. That spot is the place where Earth is found on/near Feb 1. No other place on Earth's or 2002-NT7's orbit comes as close.

    You ask another good question about deflection:

    " b) All those near flybys must not significantly alter the course of the asteroid. (comparison: geostationary satellite orbit is app. 35000km, and the satellite is deflected by 360 degrees in one day)"

    Not every object that gets within 35000km of Earth enters a geostationary orbit. The reason why 2002-NT7 is not captured by earth is that it is moving about 26.25 km/second as it crosses Earth's orbit plane. It is moving too fast to be captured by Earth and pulled into a orbit around our planet.

    FYI: An object orbiting the Earth once a day 35,000 km above the surface is moving about 3 km/second with respect to the center of the Earth. The 26.25 km/second speed of 2002-NT7 is much faster.

    BTW: Earth DOES deflect 2002-NT7. The crossing point and angle in inclination do shift a but after a close approach, but not by a huge amount. These close passes make the 2002-NT7 orbit tricky to model.

    On a different question that somebody else asked:

    " Why doesn't the XYZZY solar system program show these close approaches?"

    Your typical astro/solar system display program that runs on your PC (XEphem, RedShift, TheSky, or even that Java app on the JPL site) uses simplified assumptions that are OK for general approximation of objects that do not have significant encounters. They frequently use point size masses and only take into account the Grav pull of the Sun and major planets. High precision models must use much much much more complex models. For example, in addition to accurate 2002-NT7 observations (to measure its position) one must use a non-point Earth model. That gravity lump called EurAsia has a slightly different "tug" than the Pacific Ocean, for example. Normally that difference is not critical, but when one is trying to predict with high precision year in the future, such details can become important.

    Permit me to end with a note about critical NASA mission called GRACE.

    There is a very critical mission (largely ignored by the general press) known called GRACE. GRACE stands for Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment. The mission will obtain obtain accurate global and high-resolution determination of both the static and the time-variable components of the Earth's gravity field. This goal will be achieved by making accurate measurements of the inter-satellite range change to within one micron between two co-planar, low altitude polar orbiting satellites, using a microwave tracking system.

    GRACE will provide us with an accurate Gravity map which will improve the modeling of very close approaches. I am looking forward to the day with GRACE's gravity maps can be used to establish more detailed close approach orbit models. I wish the GRACE team all the best!

    IAACM (I Am A Celestial Mechanic) :-) and I hope this helps.

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  252. It's Silly Season. by seanyboy · · Score: 1

    The Guardian had this to say about the coming weeks news stories. The BBC always trot this one out when there's nothing else much to say.

    --
    Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
  253. NASA may soon learn how to deflect by mattr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you have been following the recent articles about the "Interplanetary Superhighway" discovered by NASA researcher Martin Lo (I have been scouring the net for papers recently) you will realize that there may be a good case for early deflection. In fact NASA re-released the story about this with a little more data just this morning (jpl mailing list). This is hot stuff!

    Lo is trying to map the low energy trajectories through the Solar System which result from calculating n-body gravitational problems for all the objects in the System. Apparently there are tube-like trails between the Sun and the Oort Belt along which objects can travel theoretically without thrust, and the dinosaur killer is thought to have come down an "offramp" to the Earth much like Shoemaker-Levy apparently did with Jupiter.

    This technology was used in the Genesis Mission and chaos theory applies to the low-energy halo orbit around a Sun-Earth libration point. After orbitting around this point a few times the robot will (without thrust) return to a sample capture point in Earth orbit.

    While I do not yet understand the math itself, it seems likely that this Rock is in a somewhat chaotic orbit and that small nudges can have very large effects on its trajectory down the way. A decade or two may not be long enough, or we might even set up a pattern which will smash us on a later orbit, but the technology is being developed right now.

  254. No drama llamas allowed by binary_athena · · Score: 1

    having read The Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale I'm thinking that loosely coupled Llama trains are less a hazard to us void engineers here in Houston than this asteroid is. Just think of the hazards of trying to explain logarithmic scales to the masses. I can feel blood pressure spiking at JSC already.

    Still, like the doc's say:
    Potential impacts with positive Palermo Scale values will generally indicate situations that merit some level of concern.

    so 0.06 merits some concern, but doesn't justify drama llamas

    --
    Life is a decision tree. We must accept that it is, like a diode, one way. Athena of the Bifurcated Pathways
  255. If we get to to pick the target by KosovoYankee · · Score: 1

    I hope it hits France.

    --
    - If This Peace Is Fictious, I Shall Destroy It
  256. 25 Jul 2002 update, where to find newer updates by chongo · · Score: 3, Informative
    As of 25 July 2002, 21:00 UTC we do not have not received any new observations for 2002-NT7. The 24 July 2002 22:00 UTC orbit model remains unchanged.

    So far, no pre-discovery images of 2002-NT7 have been found. A search of pre-discovery images is on-going.

    I will post new updates to chongo's journal over the next few weeks. Please check my journal for the latest 2002-NT7 orbit model information.

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  257. YANTJ by Franky+Hollywood · · Score: 1

    What we know as "NT7" is really just service pack that will contain numerous bug fixes and security enhancements. Unfortunately this update will necessitate a reboot. This update, however complete, poses considerable risk to mission critical systems and no warranties are implied. Networked users should discuss this update with their system administrator for further details about the risk of data loss and migration plans to another planet.

    So long and thanks for all the fish! R.I.P. D.A.

  258. We will recover from Asteroid Blast! by ratayczak · · Score: 1

    The year 2019: From out of space comes a runaway planet, hurtling between the Earth and the Moon, unleashing cosmic destruction. Man's civilization is cast in ruin. Two thousand years later, Earth is reborn... A strange new world rises from the old: a world of savagery, super science, and sorcery. But one man bursts his bonds to fight for justice! With his companions Ookla the Mok and Princess Ariel, he pits his strength, his courage, and his fabulous Sunsword against the forces of evil. He is Thundarr, the Barbarian!

  259. Space rubble less dangerous than one big rock? by geoswan · · Score: 2
    Most asteroids that they say will crumble in the atmosphere are about 200 meters in diameter, this one is 10x wider.

    I have read that the Tunguska hit is imagined to have been 50-60 metres in diameter, air-burst at a height of 8 km, releasing energy equivalent to a 10 megaton H-bomb. I read that it blew down and ignited 1000 square kilometres of Siberian forest. So clearly blowing apart in the atmosphere doesn't keep a strike from being devastating.

    Kinetic energy is one half mass times velocity squared. So a rock or an iceberg 200 metres in diameter will release 64 times as much energy as one 50 metres in diameter.

    I have a couple of questions.

    A big rock that strikes an ocean can produce a wave that will devastate coastal cities an ocean away. How much smaller is the wave if it blows apart before striking the ocean?

    It now seems that a lot of asteroids, and maybe comets, are not solid rocks, with a measure of structural integrity. It now seems that many asteroids more closely resemble very loosely bound piles of gravel. Tidal forces ripped apart Shoemaker-Levy 9.

    So, if an asteroid that is a big pile of rubble is speeding towards Earth, at what point does tidal forces overpower its very loose gravity so it fails to hold together? If none of the fragments strike solid ground it will throw up relatively little dust -- which could otherwise cloak the earth in a cloud that brings us years of endless winter. How many deaths would even a year of total crop failures cause? Hundreds of millions? Billions?

    Those of us old enough to watch broadcast TV over the air will remember how lightning disrupted the broadcast. Nuclear weapons also generate an electro-magnetic pulse (aka EMP). It is a stronger one, strong enough that our electrical power grid into a huge antennae, receiving enough energy to turn all our electronic devices into junk.

    Am I wrong to believe a rock that air-burst that releases the equivalent of kilotons bombs would generate an electro-magnetic pulse, just like a bomb? 8 kilometres, that is about the height an airliner flies at. What is the distance of your horizon at 8 kilometres? A hundred kilometres? Hundreds of kilometres?

    Some frequencies of radio can be heard at long distance. The radio waves are reflected off layers in the upper atmosphere. Can light at those frequencies carry enough energy to ruin electronics over the horizon?

    Would the EMP from a 1200 metre rock generate enough EMP to ruin electronics around the Earth?

  260. Local supernovae and other threats? by geoswan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A lot of evidence points to asteroid impact likely being the biggest actual threat to mankind

    Oh come on, what for evidence? Compared to other threats?

    Lots of civilization ending threats face us. Race ending threats face us. Life on Earth ending threats face us. For most of them the odds are basically impossible to calculate. Will we end civilization? Render the human race extinct? Render the Earth unfit for anything but the most primitve life through poisoning the Earth with our waste? It is incalculable, because it depends on making a subjective judgement of whether we can learn to be wise, instead of clever. We are clever enough to build things that could kill us as a side-effect. Are we wise enough not to? That is incalculable.

    Astronomical disasters are ones about which we can make reasonable, defensible judgements, and start to enter into actuarial calculations.

    ...I say there are dozens dangers far more likely ... and additionally asteroids is not the only astronomical accident that may happen, there are far more, just not spectaluar enough to make movies from. How about a supernova in our quater of the galaxy? We will be ripped away.

    Yes, a close enough Supernova burst could destroy civilization. Slashdot has discussed this recently, and again here. 160 to 200 light years was suggested to be the distance beyond which civilization would be safe from a supernova. NASA's picture of the day site has half a dozen articles about eta carinae, a large variable star that they state is a good candidate for the next supernova in our neck of the woods. It is well beyond that 200 ly limit.

  261. Re:Always With The Llamas... by Chaswell · · Score: 1

    No joke, when I look out my window while working I am always greated by the view of a llama munching grass 50 yards away. For some reason it is really relaxing and mildly uplifting. What a strange and gentle beast.

    Are they really as dumb as they look?

  262. The expected value is still pretty bad by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
    While I'm certainly not going to go out and buy lots of pillows on Yahoo, average people tend to vastly *under*estimate the dangers of NEOs, rather than overestimating them.

    Perhaps the chance of this one hitting the Earth is only 1/16,000,000, but it could kill off half the world population if it does.

    That's an expected value of 187.5 deaths, which is comparable to an average days killings by automobiles in the US. Of course, that's over the next 17 years, so actually, it's not something that people should worry about that much...

    But still, on average, that rock will kill 11 people a year for the next couple of decades :-).