Slashdot Mirror


Wal-Mart Enters NetFlix's Business

wcbrown writes "AP reports that Wal-Mart is entering into the online DVD rental arena, currently dominated by Netflix. Wal-Mart is starting out with 13,000 titles, six distribution centers, and competitive pricing. With a seriously tremendous infrastructure and expansive will, Wal-Mart stands poised to overtake Netflix. To say the least, that's not going to be good for business."

679 comments

  1. Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by drfuchs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't necessarily bad for NetFlix. First, it "validates" the market, and gives NetFlix a bunch of free PR (all the articles about the Walmart entering the fray will compare/contrast with NetFlix), including making tens of millions of consumers more aware of this new sort of rental scheme that they just don't grok yet. Second, it makes NetFlix a take-over target for any other company wanting to join in the competition (perhaps even BlockBuster, if their home-grown offering falters). Then again, maybe NetFlix will get blown out of the water.

    1. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. How'd he get modded to 5 when there were only four posts in the entire topic (and the topic was on the front page)?

    2. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by drfuchs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      p.s. Also, all non-Walmart stores that sell DVD players (Circuit City, Best Buy, CostCo etc.) are motivated to push NetFlix on their customers, rather than Walmart, with whom they compete. Everything from the salesperson suggesting NetFlix (and perhaps getting a kick-back if you sign up), to NetFlix coupons in/on the box, to PR at the Point-Of-Sale.

    3. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by markv242 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Substitute "Netscape" for "Netflix", and "Microsoft" for "Wal-Mart" and your comment seems frighteningly on-target.

    4. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      The last place I worked had the grand plan of becoming just barely large enough to blip in the radar of the "big boys", then sell out, make the owners rich and screw the employees (unless the "big boys" needed more people). It's really sad that people don't have bigger asperations than to just annoy a larger company into purchasing them. That being said, I don't think NetFlix had that goal in mind when they started. They probably did what most successful businesses do when they start... they saw a demand (or potential demand), and came up with a good way to distribute the supply (supplied the supply just doesn't sound right). Also, it would be prudent to mention that in this case, NetFlix is the incumbent, and Walmart is the challenger. NetFlix already has a customer-base and a good reputation. Walmart is hated in some circles simply because it's a large company (not in my circle, but I know people that will only go to Ma-and-Pa shops).

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    5. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      no, it's bad for netflix because walmart has a virtually limitless warchest and can win by attrition. how big is walmart?
      • last year their revenues were $200 billion us. that's more than the gdp of israel
      • of the 10 richest people in the world, five are waltons (of walmart fame). you think gates is a fat cat? the waltons are downright obese!
      • heck, s. robson walton may even be richer than bill! the "rich list 2001" claimed that s.r. had a personal bankroll of 65 billion, and placed him in the top slot for wealth worldwide.
      • walmart has 1 million employees. three times general motors.
      • however, despite all this, the average walmart employee makes only 15k/year.
      how do you beat that kind of war chest?
    6. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work for Circuit City...Some of our largest revenue sources come from service providers. We are very good at selling wireless (sprint's largest retailer) Direct TV and broadband internet access. We would love to sign people up for Netflix when we sell them their new DVD player.

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    7. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by (startx) · · Score: 1

      ahhh the irony. I bought my Apex 1100w Dvd player from Wal-mart a few months ago, and there was a netflix ad/coupon in the box.

    8. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Divide+By+Zero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Substitute "Netscape" for "Netflix", and "Microsoft" for "Wal-Mart" and your comment seems frighteningly on-target.


      And then Wal-Mart starts making DVD players and shipping their DVD players with a subscription to the service, and mucking with the firmware so that DVDs rented from Wal-Mart play better, and then getting the MPAA to add extensions that work only with Wal-Mart players and discs, and then Netflix gets bought by $GIANT_CORP and goes promptly nowhere.

      --
      Dare to Hope. Prepare to be Disappointed.
    9. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Computer! · · Score: 2, Funny

      how do you beat that kind of war chest?

      With a reasonable online presence, which Wal-Mart doesn't have. With an established internet brand, which Wal-Mart doesn't have.

      Every buy anything from Wal-Mart? OK, Ever buy anything from Wal-Mart online?

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    10. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by MoCycleGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On top of that WalMart has a history of only selling stuff it felt was up to its standards. If they keep up this trend there will be a lot of movies that won't be available from their service that NetFlix offers.

    11. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by hendridm · · Score: 1

      > heck, s. robson walton may even be richer than bill!

      Nope, although you are right that the Walton's combined are richer than Bill.

    12. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1
      There is no such thing as "Wal-mart is the incumbant". If Wal-mart fails, what do they lose? They fire the marketing director that came up with the idea, and continue to rake in the billions.

      If NetFlix fails, *poof*.

    13. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Except that Wal-Mart is not a convicted monopolist. Netflix at least has a fighting chance, Netscape didn't.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    14. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1

      That's because there's a wal-mart in every town, ruining every other store there. There's no need to buy something from wal-mart online. But if you're online and want to rent DVD's, and you're doing so already from Netflix, then maybe they'll try Wal-mart.

    15. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      I used to have a store called Ames in my area. It was a nice department store. Then K-Mart moved across the street, and Ames went out of business. Now Wal-mart is right down the street from K-Mart, and K-Mart is looking like it won't be there much longer. Even large corporations can fail in certain market... in this case, Walmart could fail on online DVD rentals. If they fail, they won't offer online DVD rentals anymore.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    16. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by DShard · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough this was discussed in this months wired

      Check out number 18 & 13 for the reference. prescient comment but I am sure blockbuster and walmart haven't hid the fact that they are interested in doing this.

    17. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by netsharc · · Score: 4, Funny

      They sell Lindows computers online. Argh, conflict, they sell Linux-based system, that's good, but they're attacking NetFlix, that's bad. But Lindows is dumb and Michael Robertson is just like Gates (exploits others' technology to make money), so it's down with Wal-Mart! Down with Wal-Mart!

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    18. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by outsider007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was in walmart the other day and I asked the woman at the cashier for directions to the monkey porn section. she just gave me a dirty look. I'll take my business elsewhere, thank you.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    19. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      Why is attacking NetFlix bad? What has NetFlix done to get on geeks good side (beside be first to market with an extremely cool service)? Wouldn't it be great if the price of that service cam down?

    20. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by luzrek · · Score: 1

      Wal-mart's entry won't kill of NetFlix. Wal-mart is known for filtering out possibly offensive material from CD's and DVD's that they sell. There have actually been some CD's with two versions, the one with the bad language, and the one sold at Wal-Mart. I really doubt that Wal-mart will rent anything that isn't perceived to be family friendly (Porn, Anime, European cinema).

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    21. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by RedX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      With a reasonable online presence, which Wal-Mart doesn't have.

      They don't? Walmart.com is as functional as Amazon.com or just about any B&M retailer with an online presence. Heck, this DVD rental service is already available on Walmart.com.

      Every buy anything from Wal-Mart? OK, Ever buy anything from Wal-Mart online?

      Yes, and yes. What's your point? Shopping at walmart.com was as easy as shopping at any other online retailer.

      I'm not a big fan of Walmart or their business practices, and their online presence might not be the behemoth that their B&M operations are. But they are the quinissential thousand-pound gorilla, and if they ever decide to focus on marketing their online presence, they'll be very successful. This DVD service might just be the push they need to get the necessary attention.

    22. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by osxuser-02 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Except that Wal-Mart is not a convicted monopolist. Netflix at least has a fighting chance, Netscape didn't.

      It's in their blood, though. Wal-mart has been convicted of dropping prices below cost at individual stores to kill the local mom'n'pop competition. Then they would jack the prices back up when they became the only game in town.

      It was pretty popular for Wal-mart when opening new stores in small towns, before they were busted for it.

      --

      I went to college for this?...

    23. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by John3 · · Score: 1

      I certainly agree with "Down with Wal*Mart!", but I also don't know why anyone should worry too much about NetFlix. It's not like they're some 100 year old family business. They employ drones just like Wal*Mart. NetFlix hasn't even made a profit yet.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    24. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Also, all non-Walmart stores that sell DVD players (Circuit City, Best Buy, CostCo etc.) are motivated to push NetFlix on their customers

      There's already some sort of cross-promotional deal in place between Netflix and Best Buy. (This press release identifies it as a co-branding arrangement, in which Best Buy offers Netflix's service under its own name.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    25. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by tmark · · Score: 1

      referring to a Walmart "war chest" makes it sound like Walmart is bracing for some big battle of grand long-term significance with a formidable foe. Netflix is a (relatively) small operation, with a niche clientele, and the dollars in this niche aren't (by Walmart standards) large at all. Walmart doesn't need a warchast to win a war of attrition with Netflix, because Netflix is largely irrelevant to Walmart. Walmart can do whatever the hell they want to, with or without netflix.

    26. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by dmv · · Score: 1

      Looks like they are profitable (GAAP) in this latest quarter. That's the consensus, at least. Even with expensing stock options.

    27. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by John3 · · Score: 1

      I knew they were getting close. Will they be able to stay profitable and still compete with Wal*Mart. (IMHO - no)

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    28. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I am, Walmart doesn't really have a great reputation. They've tried to build supercenters where, frankly, people absolutely did not want them to go. Pissed off a lot of folks; sorta stupid of Walmart, not doing some basic footwork to see if people want the store where they might buy real estate. I know a small number of people that do not shop there simply due to this getting the relationship off on the wrong foot. They in turn tell their friends (which, in my case, is where I learned of the fiasco, since I live in the same town but different municipality).

      I find Walmart a pain in the ass to shop in. Every store is different. We have 2 sorta nearby. My mother and father HATED going there, so they went back to their typical places; they just have no clue where to turn. You'd think a company would have a clue to put out a floor directory.

      Long lines. I shop there, occasionally, because they carry stuff no other store around that I know of does; if I need it immediately, I have little choice. I hate it. I spend more time waiting in lines for price checks and getting picked off at the door than I do driving to and from. A couple of months ago, I once stopped in to grab a snack and soda, it being late at night and they were open 24/7 and I was passing by. Tired, I wasn't thinking. I walked out, fuming, 45 minutes later with a 2L and a bag of chips.

      Some places are getting clueful--Giant and Home Depot have self-checkouts, eliminating much line wait (Home Depot in my area SUCKED because of the absurd line wait; pick up a box of nails, wait 15 minutes in line, no fast checkout). Walmart doesn't.

      Walmart customer service?? Pain, in, the, ass.

      I buy my DVDs, so I don't Netflix or Blockbuster (the latter I should say anymore). But I'd select Netflix, simply due to the customer service alone. They pay 15k a year to their average employee? Dude, it shows.

    29. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting contrast between this:

      Where I am, Walmart doesn't really have a great reputation ... I find Walmart a pain in the ass to shop in ... My mother and father HATED going there ... Walmart customer service?? Pain, in, the, ass.

      and this:

      Long lines ... A couple of months ago, I once stopped in to grab a snack and soda, it being late at night and they were open 24/7 and I was passing by. Tired, I wasn't thinking. I walked out, fuming, 45 minutes later with a 2L and a bag of chips.

      If Wal-Mart is so bad, why are they *always* extremely busy, even very late at night?

      I must have a better local Wal-Mart. Lines are rarely long, the couple of times I've dealt with customer service have been extremely smooth. The stores are big, which sometimes makes stuff hard to find. OTOH, their prices are generally good, and I love the fact that they force bands to edit their CDs (I have young children and a taste for heavy music that typically comes with nasty lyrics).

      The biggest problem I see is that the place is always so busy that you end up parking a quarter mile from the store!

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    30. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Surak · · Score: 3, Funny

      last year their revenues were $200 billion us. that's more than the gdp of israel

      And more 6 times the revenue of Microsoft Corp. last year. And the average MSFT employee makes *quite* a bit more than $15K a year. ;)

      Yeah, Walmart makes Microsoft look like a pussycat.

    31. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Zigg · · Score: 1

      Well, Netflix used to have a "Mature" section. They don't today. Also, with rare exception, Netflix has the R-rated versions of movies where both R and unrated are available.

      I don't think Netflix will have an advantage here.

    32. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever look at the back of a dollar bill?

      Ever look at the back of a dollar bill, on weed?

    33. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by suraklin · · Score: 1

      It was pretty popular for Wal-mart when opening new stores in small towns, before they were busted for it.

      They still do it. When the Super Wal-Mart opened in my are they were selling cases of Dr. Pepper for $4 until most of the smaller grocery stores either could not compete with the prices or had to go out of business entirely. Now the prices are on average $6.

    34. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by gladbach · · Score: 1

      true, it would be nice if competitions lowered prices...

      But netflix owns me. no more latefees!!! you have no idea how much money this has saved me hehe.

      --
      "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
    35. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by zeno_2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Companies have been doing this with netflix for a while. I bought a Sony DVD player probably 3 years ago, and it came with 5 free movies from netflix. I hope walmart doesn't make it in this market though, its just another step for them in world domination and I wont stand for it..!

    36. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Carbonite · · Score: 1

      Then K-Mart moved across the street, and Ames went out of business.

      And a few years before that, Ames bought out Zayre Stores and closed over 70 of them. It's a cycle that won't end until there's just one chain of stores.

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    37. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Walmart was the third most searched for retailer last year (via Google). People are certainly willing and able to find Walmart on the internet.

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    38. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Two ways that Microsoft wins, they make more money (9.6 billion vs 8.2 billion )last year, and have a higher market value (260 vs 240 billion). At the end of the day its about what you get to keep, not just what you take in that counts. That being said, I think Wal-mart would pass Microsoft, if you count options.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    39. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by tealover · · Score: 1

      I don't know, $19.99 for 3 dvds seems reasonable to me. I think Netflix has a lot of room for improvement in other areas, however. Their website is very pedestrian. Their search engine is atrocious. I hope this new competition spurs them on to better things.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    40. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's good to know my son is above average. Even as a full-time college student, last year he made a little over $17,000.00 working at WalMart.

      Some people just work harder and are more valuable.

      Of course, nobody in their right mind would want a career there unless they were in management.

      For a LOT of Walmart employees, their income is the family's SECOND income. Sure, there are some single mothers, but that's what you get when you have no job skills and spread your legs too freely.

    41. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Surak · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but Walmart matches and in someways surpasses Microsoft in evilness:
      • They actively participate in censorship within their own stores (they refuse to carry music with explicit lyrics)
      • They actively participate in price fixing and collusion
      • They actively seek to put their competitors out of business -- and more often then not they succeeed
      • Once they set themselves up as a virtual monopoly in an area, they raise prices to the point of gouging their customers
      • They actively seek to maintain their monopolies in areas they have set themselves up as one
      • They refuse to open their file formats so that other applications can be compatible -- no wait, that's Microsoft. Sorry, I get them confused sometimes ;)
    42. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      As someone who has used NetFlix almost since its inception, I can tell you that the only thing that would make me switch to WalMart would be if I could rent/return rentals online or in the store for the same monthly flat rate. Netflix is fast, convenient, and inexpensive, but I still rent at another place on those nights where I want to watch a new movie, but forgot to mail back a DVD at the start of the week. I would only switch if I could get the best of both worlds.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    43. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1

      And its name will be Taco Bell

    44. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1
      ...in this case, Walmart could fail on online DVD rentals...

      Which it doesn't do right now anyway. Thanks for proving my point.

    45. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of Bill's wealth is in MS stock. MS stock drops a point, and Bill's out a few billion.

    46. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... they have been doing this for at least six months now...

    47. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by hank_pym · · Score: 1

      This isn't necessarily a problem for NetFlix if their management team is up to the challenge.

      Wal-Mart tried to scuttle Amazon.com in 1999. That failed. Last I heard, Wal-Mart went crawling back to Amazon to have them manage their online retailling operations.

    48. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by wan23 · · Score: 1

      I live in NYC and I've never seen a Wal-mart in my life. I mean, it may be big, but it's not Starbucks or anything...

    49. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by emc · · Score: 1

      living in NYC, you've also never seen grass... or smelled air that doesn't stink of urine.

    50. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by macshit · · Score: 1
      If Wal-Mart is so bad, why are they *always* extremely busy, even very late at night?

      A couple of possibilities come to mind:

      1. Lots of people go there because they can save a penny per pound on something -- though they have to drive 30 miles extra to do it, and have their soul sucked out at the door.
      2. Walmart's put every other store out of business (see 1).
      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    51. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Evil???

      It sounds like they listen to their customers, and are incredibly competitive within their line of business...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    52. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Surak · · Score: 1

      Evil???

      It sounds like they listen to their customers, and are incredibly competitive within their line of business...


      Some would describe Microsoft as being that way, too. ;)

    53. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      In every city in the world there's grass and fresh air. Ever hear of Central Park?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    54. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      While some would, I'd say MS is far worse in terms of illegal monopolist activities that they've been able to tie up in court so long that penalties become irrelevant.

      To paraphrase one author, "people forget that Walmart used to be a small-town store too."

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    55. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for being part of the problem of stifling artists by 'protecting' your children. You fucking suck I hope your kids grow up to be foul mouthed teens who curse you and hatch evil plots.

    56. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      Losing in a market doesn't mean going out of business. It means that they won't be in that market anymore. For Walmart to go out of business, it would require some catastrophy of Biblical proportions at this point.

      NetFlix is the leader in online DVD rentals. Walmart is not. If Walmart can't beat NetFlix in some way, Walmart will no longer offer online DVD rentals. It doesn't matter that the Walmart corporation also runs a very successful franchise... it only matters that they're going into a new market with another company as the leader.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    57. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by swillden · · Score: 1

      Thanks for being part of the problem of stifling artists by 'protecting' your children.

      Blah, blah, blah, blah. I couldn't care less about the artists and the way they express their deep insights into the world. Most of the artists whose music I listen to are pampered Gen-Xers who manufacture their angst because, really, their life is good and always has been. It's a rare 20 year-old who understands anything at all about life, and most of these guys have been living a sheltered life of luxury since their early 20s.

      If I want to gain insight into the universe, I'll read a book, thanks. Preferably one written by a 50 year-old who's lived a full and troubled life.

      Nope, music is purely entertainment, a distraction that (perhaps counterintuitively) helps me focus when I'm working. And I'm glad that, with the help of Wal-Mart, I can get the entertainment I want in the form that I want it, in spite of the wishes of the silly kids who make it.

      I hope your kids grow up to be foul mouthed teens who curse you and hatch evil plots.

      It's always possible; kids come with their own personalities and develop their own ideas. Based on their personalities so far, however, that's very unlikely. I find that it helps to spend time with them. Lots and lots of it.

      Don't try to pin your frustrations with your own inadequate father on me.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    58. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If Wal-Mart is so bad, why are they *always* extremely busy, even very late at night?

      Because, people are MORONS! Yes, they will go to WalMart to save $0.02 on a roll of toilet paper, only to stand in line for an hour.

      That is why they are always busy... Their service sucks, so people come in, but can't get back out the door.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    59. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by swillden · · Score: 1

      Because, people are MORONS!

      Nonsense. Simply because you don't understand or agree with their reasoning (and, perhaps, haven't had to buy enough toilet paper to understand that a small difference can matter? A 2% savings on a monthly grocery bill of $1200 isn't so trivial as it might appear) you think they're stupid.

      Typical 17 year-old attitude.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    60. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I'm not 17, and have dealt with far more people than you can probably imagine...

      People are stupid... they do many stupid things. I know plenty of people that I could point to as an example of this. Very often people go miles out of their way to save a few dollars, not realizing that they are then loosing money because of the price of gas, not to mention the addition wear and tear on their car.

      you think they're stupid.

      I know what stupid is... I see it in force on the rare occasions I go to walmart.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    61. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by swillden · · Score: 1

      People are stupid... they do many stupid things

      But not you, right?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    62. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by dmv · · Score: 1

      I suspect they will. The pricing differences are not very substantial (if you actually look at the plans) and they can't win in a direct price-war. They have loyalty -- both consumer and channel (Best Buy will not pitch Wal*Mart); they've already dealt with the growing pains that Wal*Mart is encountering; and they've got a better system. What I haven't seen anyone mention is their recommendation system, which has probably millions of user reviews. The system has consistently gotten better -- and I trust the Netflix userbase far more than WalMart's for good movie selections. The first couple of months of using NetFlix, you go solo on choosing what you want to see... but after a while, (at least for me) the queue has several recommendations I had never heard of but sound good.

      It was frustrating when they didn't hit profitability at the Million User mark. I guess it took another hundred thousand. But I think the profit status will remain sustainable (growth, however...)

    63. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by mlrtime · · Score: 1

      They still do with gas prices as well (some have gas stations). They sell below cost to get rid of competition and then get sued.... but they can afford it.

    64. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Computer! · · Score: 1

      They don't? Walmart.com is as functional as Amazon.com or just about any B&M retailer with an online presence.

      As Amazon? Really? Check out their home electronics sections side-by-side, then make that claim. Anyway, presence is more than just a working website. Compare the online marketing strategies of the two companies.

      Yes, and yes. What's your point?

      That very few people that I know buy from Wal-Mart online.

      and if they ever decide to focus on marketing their online presence, they'll be very successful.

      That's not necessarily true. They haven't got kicked around online for this long just because they haven't focused. Their core audience and barnding strategy might not work online.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    65. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Computer! · · Score: 1

      True, but on that same list, Sears was #5. I'd like to see a revenue comparison.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    66. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      And thank god for that...unless it DOES end up like DemoMan, and all we get are fruity lookin' nacho chips...

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    67. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      Dear Mr. "Evil Viper",

      Perhaps you should look at swillden's user page before you claim to have "dealt with far more people than you can probably imagine..."

      It seems to me that he has dealt with large numbers of people in a variety of situations. He has served in the armed services, works for one of the largest companies in the world, and spent two years as a missionary in Mexico. That is just what I have gleaned from his user page.

      Read your reaction carefully and think of how it might come across to other readers. To me you don't come off as nearly as experienced at dealing with other people as he does. Just a thought.

      Best wishes,
      John

    68. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by parliboy · · Score: 1

      I guess George is especially Curious in his later years. As to reading any metaphor into The Man in the Yellow Hat...

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    69. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1
      Heh.
      Starbucks fits in a tin can. Where exactly do you think they could fit a quarter million square foot of retail?

      Not only that, but in NYC, Walmart would need to charge $10.00 for a roll of scotch tape, and that's just not their thing.

    70. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It seems to me that he has dealt with large numbers of people in a variety of situations.

      I don't come to the same conclusion from his info... While, with some positions he held, he certainly could have had extensive human interaction, but that's not necessarily the case. Certainly, software programmers aren't exactly known for human interaction either. None of his experience sounded explicitly like he had interacted with huge numbers of people, although, I will admit, that may possibly be the same.

      To me you don't come off as nearly as experienced at dealing with other people as he does. Just a thought.

      I'm not getting paid here, so I really don't worry about rules of conduct...

      That's said, the comment which you are focusing on was not intended directly for him... It was a general comment. In the context of /., everyone should understand that I don't know any people directly, so such statements should be taken as expressions, not as literal statements of fact.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    71. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I've never even seen a Walmart, let alone shopped in one. Walmart will never be able to kill off Netflix because Walmart will never cover the large metropolitan areas. Walmart will never be able to kill of Netflix because Walmart will never allow that much porn.

    72. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      I don't come to the same conclusion from his info... While, with some positions he held, he certainly could have had extensive human interaction, but that's not necessarily the case.

      You have to be kidding. He was a Mormon missionary in Mexico for two years. I can tell you that all he did all day for two years was talk to people, or at least try to. Also, working at IBM isn't cubicle prison for many people. Some travel the world interacting with CEOs of large corporations. I can assure you that he gets a mix of both. Finally, he worked as a cop. You don't think that cops interact with people? I think that his wide range of interactions is blatantly obvious from his /. bio.

      I have seen no evidence from you detailing how you have dealt with large numbers of people. Ok, I will count your antisocial attitude as evidence, but it really doesn't do much to convince me that you deal well with people. Especially if the "rules of conduct" only apply while you are at work. That strikes me as the attitude of someone who doesn't have much experience dealing with people. Please share with us how it was that you became so experienced. At this point I am immensely curious. Seriously...

      That's said, the comment which you are focusing on was not intended directly for him...

      So your comment was just a bit of cheast beating for the benefit of the /. audience? The same people that you don't think much of?

    73. Re:Maybe not such bad news for NetFlix by $$$$$exyKrout · · Score: 1

      Hey, Emi. I thought we were going to quit karma and fan whoring? Oh wait. We'll just troll all our foes, ok?

      --
      I'm ekrout. I'm a girl. Read my journal
  2. asda by Neophytus · · Score: 1

    Let's hope this spreads to asda, a company in the uk that wal mart owns. I've been wanting a serivce like netflix over here!

    1. Re:asda by Lu+Xun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Asda? Did someone just fiddle with their left hand at the business name registration office??

      --
      That's not a soda... it's a caffeine delivery device!
    2. Re:asda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer to rent > DVDXCOPY (rip) > return original. -- PIRACY RULES

    3. Re:asda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      For the UK, I've been using dvdsontap.com for more than half a year now and I must say I'm quite pleased with their service.

    4. Re:asda by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      thanks coward

    5. Re:asda by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      The last two letters stand for dairy association - can't remember what the first two are (and too lazy to Google it.)

      It was originally a chain of stores owned by dairies around the country. Now it's owned by Walmart (and in contrast to the Walmart in the US, is the best option around the UK at the moment)

  3. Patent by ihummel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quick Jeff Bezos, patent DVD rentals and save us from Walmart!

    1. Re:Patent by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 1

      Actually, in line with a post above, Amazon could partner-with/buy Netflix, and add one more revenue stream, adding that to their distribution network, and generally increasing their competiveness vis-a-vis the so called 'clicks-and-mortar' types.

      God, I don't think I've heard the term 'clicks-and-mortar' in at least two years. We are truly in a post-internet-bubble world! Ain't it grand?

      --
      if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
  4. Family fun! by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh boy! Now I can watch the entire Jersey Trilogy without the elaborate strings of curses and insults! Thanks Walmart. We may even be able to get a family-friendly "Pulp Fiction" available for rent soon. Junior will love it.

    1. Re:Family fun! by sweeney37 · · Score: 1

      Judging by their past experiences. Perhaps it would be in Wal-Mart's interest to strike up a deal with Clearplay or any of the other companies who get to decided what we should and should not see.

      Mike

    2. Re:Family fun! by Elvisisdead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I bought Dogma at Wal-Mart. Unedited.

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
    3. Re:Family fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pulp Fiction G-rated, eh?

      That would be great, a two-minute long silent movie!

    4. Re:Family fun! by MoCycleGeek · · Score: 1

      Dogma != Pulp Fiction || Xtro

    5. Re:Family fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that dance scene is still there. Perhaps the only sequence they could show uncut.

    6. Re:Family fun! by JDevers · · Score: 1

      I bought Scarface at Wal-Mart just like a week ago. They definitely don't just carry edited titles. While their music selection may be limited and editted, their movies are not.

    7. Re:Family fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We may even be able to get a family-friendly "Pulp Fiction" available for rent soon. Junior will love it."

      Or a family-friendly version of "Boogie Nights".

    8. Re:Family fun! by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      We may even be able to get a family-friendly "Pulp Fiction" available for rent soon

      Ving Rhames: "..and wait for the Wolf, who will be arriving directly"

      Samuel L. Jackson: "Golly attractive and successful African-American, thats all you had to say!"

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    9. Re:Family fun! by drwav · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart only carries edited music, and this is only because the label offers the edited version. Any music with the parental advisory sticker that does not have an edited version available will not be sold by Wal-Mart. Hence, no Eminem.

      Movies are another story, all movies are the same as the ones you will buy in any other store, which is why Wal-Mart cards anyone trying to buy an R rated movie since you need to be over 17 to purchase it.

    10. Re:Family fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does.

    11. Re:Family fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so you think. The only way you would know that is if you bought Dogma from a regular retailer and compared the DVD files, or similar. Or did a md5 fingerprint/checksum of the files to a friend's copy.

    12. Re:Family fun! by Joffrey · · Score: 1

      Good comment; I've had a hard time finding "unrated" versions of movies that were otherwise widely available.

      Much like my local Hollywood Video, which only carries the theatrical release, rather than the "unrated" versions. (E.g., American Pie, Van Wilder, etc.)

      --
      No, really! I'm one of the *good* lawyers!
    13. Re:Family fun! by jdcook · · Score: 1

      Years ago in San Francisco, I saw a broadcast-television edit of "Pulp Fiction." The heavy edit was fascinating to watch. The "medievel" scene from the gimp on was an extreme zoom on the gimp moving at about 1 frame per second with an edited soundtrack.

      --
      Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
    14. Re:Family fun! by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      As a former wal-mart dept. manger I can tell you yes there movies are edited. Althought most movies are left alone there are some movies you will never see or will see a few sections here and there cut out. The movie company were doing different covers to show that they weren't the same but like the CD you would get some returns based on the edited contant.

    15. Re:Family fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could watch the DVD. I have a device that can not only read DVD data, but also convert it to a format comprised of video and audio data.

    16. Re:Family fun! by Elvisisdead · · Score: 1

      Or, I could just watch it.

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
  5. Although they might do it.... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last week my local Walmar had a large vending machine that dispensed the DVD that you wanted to rent. and the machine would accept the returns also.

    All I needed was my credit card/ debit card.

    Maybe they are looking to expand in both online rental and vending style?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Although they might do it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I had one of those on my college campus...it was an overpriced piece of shit. Perhaps Walmart updates the titles more often, but I'd much rather drive to the nearest Blockbuster or rent from Netflix than fiddle with that cursed machine.

    2. Re:Although they might do it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In Israel (at least, some places in Tel Aviv) you can walk up to a vending machine on the street and rent DVD *porn*.

    3. Re:Although they might do it.... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      That's awesome! Imagine a plan like netflix, where you pay a fixed monthly fee for as many rentals as you like, but you don't have to do it through the mail, you just go to the store and get them.

    4. Re:Although they might do it.... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      In Israel (at least, some places in Tel Aviv) you can walk up to a vending machine on the street and rent DVD *porn*.
      ...aah, the joys of conscript army. Porn Vending Machines.

    5. Re:Although they might do it.... by l810c · · Score: 1
      There are literally thousands of these machines spread across Europe.

      I've just secured a distributorship here in the South East for one of the major manufacturers. Walmart getting into the business is a little scary. Altough McDonalds has recently gotten into the business. Also, if these guys are doing it, there Must be some validity to the market:)

      WOT, sorry: Lumpy could you contact me at l810c@yahoo.com? I'd like to know where this is and what machine they are using.

  6. Competition by Lizard_King · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To say the least, that's not going to be good for business

    Competition is good for the consumer.

    --
    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    1. Re:Competition by goldspider · · Score: 1
      "Competition is good for the consumer."

      You forgot to add the obligatory /. "...as long as the Little Guy(tm) triumphs over Big Evil Corporation(tm)."

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:Competition by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Competition is good for the consumer."

      But not for the consumed.

    3. Re:Competition by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fair competition is good for the consumer.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Competition by Indomitus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Walmart doesn't tend fo "compete" in the same way as other companies. Since they make up such a large percentage of sales of things like movies, CDs, and magazines they make a lot of demands on distributors that other companies can't ask for. This puts their competition on a very un-level playing field and has the result of killing or severely weakening any threats to Walmart's dominance. That is _not_ good for the consumer in the long run.

    5. Re:Competition by BigBir3d · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What is so unfair about Wal-Mart moving into the online DVD rental business?

      Maybe now we will see some "innovations" in Netflix's offerings?

    6. Re:Competition by wcbrown · · Score: 1

      That statement was supposed to be a reference from this Seinfeld episode. Okay, I'll grant that it's maybe a little too obscure.

      I agree wholeheartedly that competition is good for everyone and that Netflix can only get better for it (or go under, thereby yielding to a better player).

      I guess I should've went with my comparison of the Netflix spokeswoman to the Iraqi information minister when she said that "Wal-Mart and Blockbuster will end up in a battle for the No. 2 spot." Okay, maybe that one wasn't great either!

    7. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      God God, you're an idiot.

      -Rufus

    8. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ""...as long as the Little Guy(tm) triumphs over Big Evil Corporation(tm)."

      Ass.
      There is only little guys. Corporations are a merchantile fiction.

    9. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of a price war? Meijer and Kmart by my house had gas price wars. One summer the price went as low as .88 cents per gallon (i'm not kidding). Although they lose thousands of dollars each day, they make it up with customers that stop by to get gas, and then do a little shopping, etc. All the usual gas stations like BP, Sunoco stuck at 1.30-1.40 couldn't do that. I think what walmart might do is lower their prices so much that local stores can't compete. I think this is called outsourcing? I think there is even legislation against it passed during the early 1900 oil monopolies.

    10. Re:Competition by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      I think what walmart might do is lower their prices so much that local stores can't compete. I think this is called outsourcing?

      The phrase you are looking for is predatory pricing and Walmart has been accused of it many times.

      Outsourcing is when you hire an outside company to perform job functions that would normally be performed internally - such as payroll, legal, etc.

    11. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One summer the price went as low as .88 cents per gallon (i'm not kidding).
      Yeah you are. You're telling me you could buy a full tank of gas for about a dime.

      Decimal points do actually mean something. Use them with care.

    12. Re:Competition by willpall · · Score: 0

      Fair competition does NOT mean all players have to be equal. Wal-Mart is where it is today precisely because is could out-compete it's counterparts. I'm so sick of hearing people cry over the poor mom n' pops being run out of town by big bad Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart doesn't do a damn thing to shut these people down, the consumers do. If there is anyone to "blame" for the trend, it is the consumer who chooses Wal-Mart to save a few pennies on each purchase, not the store for pricing their products as they do. When you get to be that large, you get to dictate terms to distributors. This may not turn out to be best for the consumer in the long run (it probably won't be), but don't forget that the consumer deserves the blame.

      --
      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.
    13. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer the question, "geekoid." What is it about the Walmart business model for online DVD sales that is "unfair?"

      We're all waiting on your insight.

    14. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I meant 88 cents per gallon. And yes, I am aware that decimal points mean something.

    15. Re:Competition by oopy_-_ · · Score: 5, Informative

      It looks like the first innovation Wal-Mart made was shifting the liability for lost/stolen DVDs to the consumer. With NetFlix, as long as it doesn't happen often, you don't get penalized for having one lost in the mail, with Wal-Mart, it costs you $17.88 (see here).

    16. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not be kidding but you're a fucking moron. See above post Re: decimal points.

      FUCK OFF AND DIE, DIPSHIT!

    17. Re:Competition by jridley · · Score: 1

      That bites. I'm a Netflix subscriber. I haven't lost one, but I did have one disappear in the mail for about 3 weeks. Netflix just said "OK, we'll just ship you another disc then. If you report a whole lot of 'missing' DVDs then we reserve the right to suspend your account." I thought that was fair.

      I've also had 3 DVDs broken in the mail, but it looks like that's OK by Wal-Mart.

    18. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, maybe Netflix will finally "innovate" and start offering decent porn. Not the dime-a-dozen assfucking barnyard shit, but the quality, tasteful stuff that is a bit beyond NC-17. My wife and I have tried a few of the "racier" titles they do offer, and frankly, they sucked (in a bad way). We would likely upgrade our subscription level if Netflix had good porn -- after all, while we can't always find time to watch some standard Hollywood movie, there's always time for porn! :)

    19. Re:Competition by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1
      Goddamn, man, you can't post links to those things! It's like Cartman not being able to stop singing the whole Sail Away Song... I have to read the whole episode!!

      Argh!

      Although it did go a little faster than watching it - even with Tivo.

    20. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why don't you try reading your own links? It says specifically that this only happens in the even that your account is cancelled. It seems reasonable to me that Wal-Mart would expect their discs back on cancellation. As far as I understand, Netflix has a similar policy.

    21. Re:Competition by MushMouth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Porn would kill their business model. The truth is that netflix make more money when people don't return their DVD's. Porn users have a tendancy to be insatiable.

    22. Re:Competition by Ovidius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What is so unfair about Wal-Mart moving into the online DVD rental business?

      There's nothing specifically unfair about Wal-Mart get into the online DVD rental, except that they can absorb huge losses while they wait for their competition to die.

      That may seem like it's just the breaks of being in business, but Wal-Mart's brick-and-mortar store strategy is to open up so many Wal-Mart's in an area that it cuts into everyone's bottom line, even that of the other Wal-Mart's. Then when all the mom and pops are gone and any other competitors -- surprise! -- all the Wal-Mart's but one are closed. Net effect, fewer jobs and zero choice about where to take your business.

      This is a "vertical" example of the same thing. Now that many American's have no place to shop and work other than Wal-Mart, they have to leech into other sectors of the economy in order to grow, and growth is the only important thing in American business these days. Doing what you do well (as Netflix does, in my opinion) doesn't count any more. Whatever you do, you have to do it more and more, no matter how bad you get at it because you're doing too much.

      This is bad because only being able to choose what Wal-Mart sells is no real choice, and because Wal-Mart has very specific ideas about what you should be able to buy.

    23. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I was too busy having a life.

    24. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, you got me there. Guilty as charged!

    25. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one reason why I said they ought to stick with the tasteful stuff only. Those "insatiable" porn users are almost like addicts, and they always need something more insane, more hardcore, more bizarre. They don't like tasteful.

      Of course, after reading the porn store clerk blog, I have to wonder if renting porn is such a good idea after all (you never know where it's been or what's been on it). But how the hell else do you find out what titles are actually worth something? I figure even with the tasteful stuff, only about 5-10% of it is any good. I ain't gonna buy something if there's an overwhelming chance it won't get me (and my wife) off!

      *hears crickets*
      Shit, did I just scare everyone off with too much information? LOL!

    26. Re:Competition by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Ask M$ what it's like to go into a business losing money hand over fist while waiting for competition to fail...

      All stores have very specific ideas of what you should be able to buy. Considering the shear number of goods available in a new Wal-Mart SuperCenter... they kinda believe in choice.

      Most communities are not allowing Wal-Mart to move in (I live in CT and this is true, as well as in Washington state that I know of off the top of my head).

      How does Netflix making money, as it does quite nicely, not count any more? That is the only reason why they are in business.

      Face it already, Utopia does not exist. Adapt to the world or die. Seems simple enough.

    27. Re:Competition by VooDoo999 · · Score: 1

      Actually, when Wal-Mart pulled Maxim off their shelves, the response was more of a 'so what?' since Wal-Mart only sold about 3% of their issues. At least for (some) magazines, Wal-Mart isn't the 500 lb elephant. Extra Credit Reading And yes, it is from Fox news, unfortunately.

    28. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn users have a tendancy to be insatiable.

      Hope you're not speaking from experience...

    29. Re:Competition by efflux · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, Utopia does exist, and you can play it. However,I'm sure you meant "utopia".

      Most communities are not allowing Wal-Mart to move in.

      Replace "most" with "some", and I'd be inclined to believe you. As it stands now, most communities already have let Wal-Mart move in.

      Considering the shear number of goods available in a new Wal-Mart SuperCenter... they kinda believe in choice

      O.k. Go buy a Cat5 crossover cable. An item any mom and pop computer supply store would carry. What? No cable? Is this too specialized for Walmart? Too bad if they kill the small stores that would carry it. Or, how about trying to build theatrical costumes with fabric supplies from Wal-Mart. Sure, a large enough community will still have the speciality stores, but a mid-sized college town is totally fucked.

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    30. Re:Competition by oopy_-_ · · Score: 1

      That's not what it says. Their policy is if a DVD is ever lost / not returned, you owe $18. Very different from NetFlix. The cancelled part has to do with getting everything back in 7 days from when you cancel, not the charges, which always apply.

    31. Re:Competition by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1

      They don't do porn because the head of Netflix is on the CA school board. They used to do porn but that was used against him politically so they dropped it. Walmart also won't do porn because they're too "family". I wish I had enough money to start an online PornFlix business.. it seems sure fire.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    32. Re:Competition by LupusUF · · Score: 1

      very true...netflix needs some competition. I was very disapointed with their service, because of their long waits. I was a frequent renter, so I was low on the food chain when trying to get popular movies, so my first 20 or so choices all had "very long wait." If walmart or blockbuster can do it better, maybe I will try out their services and actually stick with them

    33. Re:Competition by LS · · Score: 1

      I don't think the submitter was referring the consumers. S/he was referring to Netflix' business.

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    34. Re:Competition by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Remember, we (American consumer) made Wal-Mart what it is today.

      The last place I lived was a mid-size college town (Tucson AZ) that had 2 Wal-Mart stores. 1 in the NW and 1 in the East side of town. There is more than enough stores to go to that are not Wal-Mart. Sure there is no K-Mart... but who cares? They sucked, and their business tripped because of it. The small local shops are doing quite well. They can all offer things Wal-Mart can not, good personal service.

      Your cable anology is lame. Go to Fry's (computer store) and try to buy a bicycle. At least I can go to Wal-Mart's website and buy a computer (or a patch cable that I can make into a crossover cable). Big fricking deal.

    35. Re:Competition by Ovidius · · Score: 1

      Ask M$ what it's like to go into a business losing money hand over fist while waiting for competition to fail...

      I'm not sure what your point is. They are a prime example, since they've reached a point where their market penetration feeds off of itself rather than the overall quality or innovativeness of their products.

      Most communities are not allowing Wal-Mart to move in (I live in CT and this is true, as well as in Washington state that I know of off the top of my head).

      Most? Try "a handful" or "a lucky few." My wife is from a small town in Virginia (Ashland) where the local small-businesses bitterly fought Wal-Mart. They lost, a lot of their businesses are ruined, but at least residents are saved the 10 minutes it took to drive to the next nearest Wal-Mart.

      How does Netflix making money, as it does quite nicely, not count any more? That is the only reason why they are in business.

      Look at another popular current Slashdot topic: SCO. A lot of people subscribe to the theory that SCO just wants to look good enough to be bought. Markets are saturated, big businesses have to buy smaller ones to show growth, and smaller ones have to be bought if the executives are going to make any money because they will never survive against the big boys. That isn't life, that's a game -- problem is business provides people their livelihood, and they're losing they're livelihoods fast.

      Face it already, Utopia does not exist. Adapt to the world or die. Seems simple enough.

      Ah, they sterotypical response of someone without the courage to stand up and change his circumstances. I'm sorry if that sounds like a flame, but any sentence that ends "...or die" just rubs me the wrong way. I will gladly lag behind in your great race to the bottom if the pile, I plan to do all I can to leave a better world for my children.

    36. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Count on Slasdot to take the communist side of things!

      Walmart bad for business? Their suppliers don't think so:
      [from the forbes article]

      "How Wal-Mart chooses to wield this power is today's $244 Billion Question. Many assume that the company uses it crudely, cracking suppliers' heads and stealing their lunch money. But if that were the case, you'd expect to see manufacturers' margins shrinking. And? According to Value Line, operating margins of household product makers actually grew 48% between 1992 and 2001; food processors' went up 30%; soft drink makers' rose 14%. Though horror stories do circulate (some entrepreneurs have accused Wal-Mart of knocking off their product proposals), Wal-Mart also towered as the "best retailer with which to do business" in a Cannondale Associates survey of 122 manufacturers. "I think most would say that Wal-Mart is their most profitable account," says Silvermine's Paul Kelly. "

    37. Re:Competition by balthan · · Score: 1

      Yes, maybe Netflix will finally "innovate" and start offering decent porn.

      Try Flicksmart. I believe they are run by the same company. They at least have almost identical envelopes, only grey instead of red and changes to the wording. But the layout is identical. My guess is that Netflix is trying to keep their service "pure." Besides, they can get 2 subscription that way.

      Errr....um...so I hear, anyway.

    38. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try not to ignore his point, moron. Look at all the cd's Wal-Mart edits for an example.

    39. Re:Competition by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Wal-mart isn't a company about absorbing huge losses. they're about making money (and making customers happy, thus the smilely face), and although sam walton isn't around anymore to make sure they stick to his philosphies anymore, the company is still held by his family.
      yeah, wal-mart is huge, but how did they get that way? by actually meeting the needs of the communities they serve. Thier entire distrobution model turned the the discount chain on it's head.
      They sell double the amount of mechandise In dollar value per square foot vs. either target or k-mart. at least they did when I worked at K-mart.
      wal-mart is a good company, and if they put netflix out of buisness it won't be by presuring them out of the buisness -- it'll be because they out do netflix at it's core buisness model.
      I like mom and pop chains, but now that I live out in the middle of nowhere I can't find anyplace that has anime so if I want to rent it I've got to get either netflix or this new wal-mart service, and you can bet title availability will be decidng whom I go with.

    40. Re:Competition by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Competition is all well and good, but not when you violate the law to do so. Look at all the lawsuites from workers that were forced to work overtime hours without being paid, or sending *salaried* pharmasists home during slow days and docking their pay.

    41. Re:Competition by mthyen · · Score: 1

      That still isn't unfair competition. When people start getting zinged with it, they'll probably look around and find Netflix.

    42. Re:Competition by Ovidius · · Score: 1

      Wal-mart isn't a company about absorbing huge losses.

      Not overall, but you bet they can lose money on DVD rental in the short term if the prize in monopolization of the market in the long term. That the risk Netflix takes by being n business. What will you do when Netflix is out of business, Wal-Mart is the only place to get Anime (except for the anime that isn't "wholesome" enough for them to carry), but their title selection sucks, which it can because they don't have any competition anymore.

      Caveat: I like Netflix but I don't know anything about how they treat their employees. Maybe Netflix is a worse place to work than Wal-Mart. In NYC, where I live there are mostly two kinds of video-stores: crappy ones and Blockbuster, and Blockbuster is crappy. So renting from a mom-and-pop video store is ot an option.

      although sam walton isn't around anymore to make sure they stick to his philosphies anymore, the company is still held by his family. yeah, wal-mart is huge, but how did they get that way? by actually meeting the needs of the communities they serve.

      Sam Walton's philosophy. Here are a few high notes of that philosophy (from alternet.org):

      • The average worker makes $15,000/year, working full time.
      • In a world that is increasingly about unreliable part-time work, a whopping 70% of Wal-Marts employees work full-time. How do that do it? By defining full-time to mean 28 hrs a week!.
      • Employee turnover is over 50%/year with some stores hitting 100% -- having to replace every worker every year. Sounds like a great place with a great philosophy!
      • When meat cutters in Texas got sick of how they were treated at Wal-Mart and voted to unionize, Wal-Mart closed all of its meat-cutting departments
      • It's "We buy American Campaign" is a sham. They are the world's largest importer of Chinese made goods. Their low prices are thanks to impoverished Chinese people working 16 hour days for $0.13/hr.

      There is more to life than selling the most. And while it isn't Wal-Mart's job to make people happy, it is our job to protect ourselves and realize that places like Wal-Mart sell crap, no one that works there knows anything about what they sell, and working there is crap. When you spend money at your local Wal-Mart, you are basically exporting money from your town. They only part of that money that gets put back into your community is the chump change that passes for wages.

    43. Re:Competition by Ovidius · · Score: 1

      We the American consumer do a lot a of stupid things. A lot of economic theory assumes a "rational actor" who only does what is in his best self interest, based on perfect knowledge of his situation. Any psychologist will tell you that real people are not rational actors and we usually don't have perfect knowledge.

      When did it become such an awful thing to go to a computer store for a computer and a bicycle shop for a bicycle?

      As far a Tucson is concerned, 850,000 people is a lot for 2 Wal-Marts (that the first figure I could find for the population of Tucson). Ashland, the town I mentioned above with two Wal-Marts within 10 minutes of each other, has that many for 86,000! I have relatives in plenty of places where there is only Wal-Mart, and nowhere else to shop except for porn. People used to own their own businesses, now they work at Wal-Mart.

      It's called the death of the middle class. I guess we all have to adapt to minimum wage or die.

      I'll repeat what I said in another post. When you buy from chains like Wal-Mart you are exporting money from your community. Don't say Wal-mart creates jobs because they don't. They generally cost more jobs at the other stores that are driven out of business than they create at the new Wal-Mart, then they depress local wages because they now have less competition in the labor market.

      Buy from your neighbors, that puts your money back into your community.

    44. Re:Competition by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Ah, they sterotypical response of someone without the courage to stand up and change his circumstances. I'm sorry if that sounds like a flame, but any sentence that ends "...or die" just rubs me the wrong way. I will gladly lag behind in your great race to the bottom if the pile, I plan to do all I can to leave a better world for my children.

      I stand up and fight for what I believe in. I don't believe that Wal-Mart is inherently evil. I am much more worried about my lack of freedoms with respect to something other than shopping. In this age, I don't have to buy much of anything from any one place, I can always go online and buy it somewhere else.

      Big businesses don't have to buy up small ones to show growth. That is to appease the investors that bought shares expecting 20% returns every year. We need to get out of the "quick fix" mindset to fully understand the markets (not the stock market). To show growth, all a company has to do is make improvements. Whether it be opening more stores, more profitable transactions, whatever. The company I work for (weird - one of my customers is a fastener distributor in Ashland), is growing due to everyone busting their ass off to improve our market situation. SCO is a classic example of a company that just doesn't understand that is what it takes.

      The better world for your children line is tired. Look at what you were given by your parents, with an entire generation set to do what you just said...

      (My M$ reference was to XBOX)

    45. Re:Competition by Ovidius · · Score: 1

      I don't have to buy much of anything from any one place, I can always go online and buy it somewhere else.

      For now. But if Wal-Mart and its ilk can, they will dominate the internet as completely as they dominate brick-and-mortar retail. I hope that that will be impossible, and I still think that they never will be able to achieve that kind of domination, but I'm not as sure as I used to be.

      Big businesses don't have to buy up small ones to show growth. That is to appease the investors that bought shares expecting 20% returns every year. We need to get out of the "quick fix" mindset to fully understand the markets (not the stock market).

      On the one hand I totally agree. On the other hand, markets do not cure all ills.

      The company I work for (weird - one of my customers is a fastener distributor in Ashland), is growing due to everyone busting their ass off to improve our market situation.

      Good for your company (honestly, no sarcasm). However, the number of companies like that are shrinking. And yes, that is wierd.

      The better world for your children line is tired.

      It may be tired but I mean it, and I make a lot of choices based on it.

      Look at what you were given by your parents, with an entire generation set to do what you just said...

      Yup. I cannot express my frustration with the all-talk no-walk baby boomers. But what will the outcome be if we give in to cynicism because they turned out to be lame?

    46. Re:Competition by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      For now. But if Wal-Mart and its ilk can, they will dominate the internet as completely as they dominate brick-and-mortar retail. I hope that that will be impossible, and I still think that they never will be able to achieve that kind of domination, but I'm not as sure as I used to be.

      I think most every company wants market domination. The power to do what you want, when you want, can be a strong motivator, regardless the topic.

      On the one hand I totally agree. On the other hand, markets do not cure all ills.

      Very true. But they do weed out the incompetent businesses that shouldn't be in a postition to provide goods or services (Enron for one).

      However, the number of companies like that are shrinking.

      I agree. I think this is due to the atmosphere the owners decided to create 19 or so years ago, and it is really starting to pay off.

      It may be tired but I mean it, and I make a lot of choices based on it.

      As long as you understand the repurcussions.

      But what will the outcome be if we give in to cynicism because they turned out to be lame?

      If I knew that... I probably wouldn't be posting in this forum! ;-)

      Where you use cynicism and skepticism, I consider myself to be more of a realist. I try not to get stuck on the ideals, but rather deal with the situation as it presents itself. Things could be better, but I refuse to waste time talking about it when I could be acting out, or accepting it. My actions depend on the subjects importance to me, of course.

    47. Re:Competition by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Competition is good for the consumer.

      That's what Microsoft keeps saying...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    48. Re:Competition by efflux · · Score: 1
      Remember, we (American consumer) made Wal-Mart what it is today.
      How astute.

      The last place I lived was a mid-size college town (Tucson AZ) that had 2 Wal-Mart stores. 1 in the NW and 1 in the East side of town. There is more than enough stores to go to that are not Wal-Mart. Sure there is no K-Mart... but who cares? They sucked, and their business tripped because of it. The small local shops are doing quite well. They can all offer things Wal-Mart can not, good personal service. Your cable anology is lame. Go to Fry's (computer store) and try to buy a bicycle. At least I can go to Wal-Mart's website and buy a computer (or a patch cable that I can make into a crossover cable). Big fricking deal.

      The point I was trying to make (but a bit too lazy to have made) is that Wal-Mart sells a wide vareity of general goods (including computer merchandise). Many local businesses rely on two types of customers: those searching for specialty merchandise, and those who need more popular goods. For example, in a bike shop, you are likely to find more than just bikes, but you will also find a lot of accessories to go with the bikes (helmets,pads,locks,innertubes, tire patch kits, etc. etc. etc.). Nevertheless, most of the money the shop is likely to make is from the bikes. However, when someone can just go to Wal-Mart to buy a bike (and many do), this will obviously cut into their profits. By loosing their primary income, they may well be forced to close. After the more specialized stores closed, wal-mart is now the only place to buy a bike or any bicycle equipment. As you know, there will likely be less of a selection of bicycles & accessories. This is my point.

      Now, my cable analogy is nothing like trying to buy a bicycle from Fry's. Fry's doesn't sell bicycle helmets, inner tubes, etc; but Wal-Mart *does* sell straight-though cables, printers, monitors, and computers, and many other peripherals, cables, etc. You call Tucson, AZ a mid sized town!!!! We obviously have different ideas of mid-sized. I was thinking mid-sized as in "mode", you seem to be thinking of some median (perhaps more accurate, but it's not what I was thinking). I'm from a town of about 15,000. Wal-Mart (and now Office Depot) has *killed* the only local computer hardware store we had. ... At least I can go to Wal-Mart's website and buy a computer (or a patch cable that I can make into a crossover cable). Big fricking deal.
      How icredibly special.

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    49. Re:Competition by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Your bicycle anology is backwards, the profits are not in the bikes. The money is to be made in the accessories and services provided.

      Example:

      $500 bike yields $100 profit. $200 other stuff (helmet, shorts, gloves, shirt, pump etc) yields $100 profit.

      Welcome to the world of retail.

      The loss of small retailers that were only in business due to a total lack of competition is "how incredibly special."

      As to Tucson, it is very spread out. Takes over an hour to drive North to South or East to West across town (exluding interstate of course).

    50. Re:Competition by efflux · · Score: 1
      Your bicycle anology is backwards, the profits are not in the bikes. The money is to be made in the accessories and services provided.

      Where's your support? Here's mine:

      Some small owner/operator bicycle shops attribute over 15 percent of their revenue to repairs. Generally, industry studies have shown that sales of new bikes represent 45 percent of a typical bike shop's business, parts and accessories - 25 percent, service - 22 percent and second-hand bike sales - eight percent. (from http://www.ebc.com.au/product/product.asp?loc=1,35 ,7).

      As for gross margins on bicycles,

      Doyle said that industry-wide it ranges between 33 and 34 percent, there are no signs that's about to change.(from http://www.bicycleretailer.com/bicycleretailer/bus iness_resources/article_display_resources.jsp?vnu_ content_id=1122253)

      45% is substantail business. Loosing a significant chunk out of 45% of your business will kill you. Period.

      Now, assuming a 33% margin on 45% of total revenue, and furthermore, assuming the remaining business is pure profit, this is still accounts for ~21% of total profits. Now, using a more likely figure of a 50% margin on the remaining 55% of non-bike-sales revenue, we have sales of bikes comprising a little over 35% of profits. This is not taking into account that fact that someone who bought a bike from a shop is likely to return for accessories and service from the very same shop. *Even disregarding this fact*, 35% of profits are important for the shop to hold up. This also doesn't include the second hand bike sales (another 8% of total business) which are likely to have an even higher profit margin than the 33% cited for new bikes.

      Granted, I may have somewhat overestimated the sale of bicycles. But frankly, I didn't expect you to be such an ass about it. I would also like to point out how you seem to have likewise grossly *underestimated* the profit magins on a bicycle. It is *not* typically 20%.

      Welcome to the world of retail. You fucking dick. Don't patronize me.

      There's no denying the fact that large chains have hurt small business. I wonder about anyone who tries to argue otherwise. I really doubt you're arguing against me becuase you disagree.

      As to Tucson, it is very spread out. Takes over an hour to drive North to South or East to West across town (exluding interstate of course). So? It's still a metropolitan area of nearly 900,000 people. That's a *very* large city. Surely you know that larger cities are better able to support specialty shops because there will still be enough people to shop at them even if most people go to larger chains? I mean, what the fuck are you trying to say?

      Now, if you remember the original point I was making (which it seems you've become distracted from)... I was pointing out how there isn't really much *choice* in Wal-Mart. Yes, they have a wide variety of goods. However, when considering any particular type of merchandise, they have a *much smaller* selection of goods than a specialty store (and won't even think about special orders of merchandise they don't carry). Now, this is a problem becuase when Wal-Mart kills these other stores off (and they *DO*--why the hell would communities try to keep them out, as you were so quick to point out?--Do you realize how fucking inconsistent you are?--why the hell would you even point this out if you didn't think it held some sort of merit?--Why don't you think about what you're saying instead of focusing on how to make me look stupid), these outlets for these specialty goods no longer exist. Getting ahold of these items, then, can be *extremely* difficult. Luckily, the pervasiveness of the internet *may* solve some of these problems, though there is still nothing like being able to go to a store front when you need help.

      The loss of small retailers that were only in

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    51. Re:Competition by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I was referring to how wal-mart treats it's customers -- not it's employees. In my experience i get a lot better treatment as a customer... at wal-mart. I've never worked for them, although i did work for k-mart once.
      your site didn't load at all for me so i can't see what context you pulled those 'facts' out of, but having worked at taco bell they have a 125% a year turn over rate... having to replace every remployee every Nine months. frankly I don't see how even 50% can be true I Loved working retail -- then again k-mart never even told me that they were going to stop scheduling me. they just did one week and i didn't work there anymore.
      Selling the most $ per sq ft means one thing they're obviously doing thier job better than anyone else, and ultimately it's wal-marts consumers that need to be pleased the most... the employees obviously shouldn't be treated like garbage, but they are working in retail -- a market where the customer determines how many hours the employees need to work a week, more than anything.

    52. Re:Competition by Ovidius · · Score: 1

      but they are working in retail -- a market where the customer determines how many hours the employees need to work a week

      That's misguided! Being in the retail market may determine how hours the store needs to be open per week. Wal-Mart management determines how many people it takes to accomplish that.

      Of course they make that determination in their own self-interest, while the kind of workers who work at Wal-Mart or K-mart often lack the ability -- due to lack of any work that pays a living wage in the area -- to act in their own self-interest. That's a recipe for exploitation, and we shouldn't put up with it as customers, consumers, or citizens.

      Just because they sell the most per square foot doesn't mean its good for society. Humanity doesn't exist to make money for Wal-Mart.

    53. Re:Competition by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Well, it is true that society isn't here to make sure wal-mart makes a profit, but neither is wal-mart a part of a socialist regime where everyone has full-time employment, even if that means they have 50 people using push brooms to sweep the city park to get there...
      my point was that wal-mart suceeds in a capitalistic society because they meet the needs of thier customers first and formost... the employee can't possibly come before the consumer.
      I understand the wal-mart employees shouldn't be treated like dirt, but in my opinion retail chains like wal-mart do the best they can considering what they have to work with.
      I _liked_ working at k-mart i got a store discount that applied to everything except close-out sales ... and i got a dollar an hour better pay than I did in fast food, and there was enough variety in the work that i wasn't bored either. I was also an over-night person so i always got 40 hrs a week, so my pay was good, the place where they treated me like dirt was just putting up the schedule without any hours listed for me to tell me i didn't work there anymore...

  7. ...and no pop-under ads... by djh101010 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Given that NetFlix has been pushing pop-under ads to my browser, I've chosen to avoid being a customer of theirs. So, as long as Wal-Mart doesn't start doing the same sort of thing, this sounds like a great idea.

    I wonder if they'll have a similar "frequent renters get lower priority" scheme to what NetFlix has.

    1. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

      I've never seen this from them. but it could be gator or some other nasty adware

      just run adaware and remove the spyware/adware thats doing it.

    2. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One company that supports pop-up ads vs another that supports the KKK...

      Wow, you must REALLY hate those pop-unders! ;)

    3. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      My browser dosen't allow that sort of thing.

    4. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is with Safari on the Mac, which has been otherwise very good about blocking unwanted popups. The ad in question has just shown up in the last couple of days. I'm still debating which browser to settle on for the Mac, but I know what it won't be...

    5. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      They used to have a pop-up for when you rented a film, but now that just goes to a real page.

      There are no pop-ups, let alone -unders, on NetFlix.

    6. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of things that your browser does better than the generic brand.

      --
      Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
    7. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by CeruleanSilver · · Score: 1

      He means that Netflix uses pop-unders to advertise. I've seen them myself when I check my hotmail account (which requires I enable javascript).

    8. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen any Netflix popups with Safari, can you point us to a site that causes the popup? Also, I frequently find myself accidentially turning off popups - I hit Cmd-K (toggle popups) instead of Cmd-L (location). Why did they have to put the two shortcuts so close together? Why even have a shortcut for popups in the first place?

      Anyway, I guess all I can say is make sure you are using the latest version, remember that this is still Beta software until 10.3 comes out, and check out Camino if you haven't already.

      --
      Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
    9. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      Netflix is definitely on my shit-list. I'm running Mozilla now, so I don't see them any more, but they were one of the last pop-unders I did see. Too bad, too, because I thought they had a clever business idea.

    10. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by eric256 · · Score: 1

      I've never had any problems with advertisments from NetFlix or from delayed rentals. I almost always get vidoes withen 4 days of droping the old ones in the box. Now if i could just remember to send them back the old ones sooner :-)

      I general go through 10 DVD's a month and pay $20, so $2 per DVD versus $3-$5 at BlockBuster or Hollywood seems pretty good. Especialy since i normaly forget to take those back to and have to pay late fee's ($10+ dollars in late fees sucks. Shoulda just bought the damn thing.) :-)

    11. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by stoutstreet · · Score: 0

      pretty quick on the trigger to blame the site. never seen anything of the sort from netflix, and i surf there with IE.
      ever install a p2p app? gator? kazaa? anything shareware?

    12. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they should have made the keyboard 5 feet wide so the keys would be farther apart. :)

      But seriously, I've also seen no popunders in Safari. But then, I'm running a transparent proxy with Privoxy as one stage, so maybe that's filtering them out first.

    13. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good God, this is about the most fucking moronic reason yet for boycotting a company.

    14. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Nope, never. Before I disabled pop-unders on Mozilla, I'd see them, but only for a day or so. And I run Mozilla on FreeBSD - pretty low chance of a spyware app.

      In any case, if Netflix is advertising through Gator, Kazaa, et al, they are more evil than they would be with pop-unders on random websites. Far more evil.

    15. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by jgilbert · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen any Netflix popups with Safari, can you point us to a site that causes the popup?

      CNN

      Apparently, it's an AOL/TW thing. I was using IE today testing and noticed it. My knee jerk reaction was to cancel my subscription. However, I'll probably just send them some feedback on how dissappointed I am and see if anything changes. Unless I end up discovering somewhere better, they have seemed a bit slow lately on DVD turn-around.

    16. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must work in advertizing, because only one of those cocksuckers would be able to stand pop ups.

    17. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      "I haven't seen any Netflix popups with Safari, can you point us to a site that causes the popup?"

      Found it. Upon leaving http://www.cnn.com I am sent a popup with the URL of http://www.cnn.com/cnn_adspaces/adsPopup2.html?0 which displays the Netflix pop-under ad to me.

    18. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart's real opportunity is to let people return it to the store so they can get films sooner. Then you have brought people to your store, and you have more opportunities to sell them some crap.

    19. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NetFlix supports spam. I emailed them about one of thier "affiliates" and they gave me the run-around. I then canceled my NetFlix account.

    20. Re:...and no pop-under ads... by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Netflix has an affiliate program. It's possible some of those ads are being paid for by users of this service who are getting a commision from the sign-ups (if any).

      Affiliate programs have long been a favorite of amateur spammers, it wouldn't surprise me to see people buying web ads for them as well.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  8. Great by Indomitus · · Score: 0, Troll

    One more thing I won't be buying from Walmart. whoohoo!

  9. Finally by stanmann · · Score: 3, Funny

    Walmart announced this service 6 months ago, Oh, wait. Not news, Just expanding their service... Of course Considering that walmart tends to bury the competition... and that their "free" trial is 30 days. Buh-by netflix.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I announced the service of beating your fat ugly face into a shapeless pulp, but you haven't taken me up on the offer yet.

      AC to the Motherfuckin' DC

    2. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring it sucker, I'll make you wish I was never born.

  10. Selection problems by MrLint · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well as we have seen Walmart has a long and unbroken track record of removing/banning/censoring things too non-consertative/too non-christian/too non-'patrotic'/too 'contreversial' for their perceived vanilla brain dead store-goers. It will remain to be seen what they actually make available.

    1. Re:Selection problems by WatertonMan · · Score: 1

      I bought my copy of Mulholland Drive at Walmart. I can't think of too many films they've not had which has a sufficient audience.

    2. Re:Selection problems by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was part of my thinking.

      The reason why I've used Netflix (well, until recently, but that's because I've moved and don't know where I'm going end up for a bit) is so check out some anime, watch it, and return it, rather than spending $20 a pop.

      I'd be surprised if Walmart went out of their way to stock titles like that - though, with their buying power, I might be surprised.

      Either way, I likes compitition - because then I win.

    3. Re:Selection problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UNLESS, the competition drives all others out of business....and the prices go up/choices go down.

    4. Re:Selection problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Can you say "masturbatory, self-inflating post"?

    5. Re:Selection problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you been in a Walmart lately? That's where I bought my copy of GTA:VC 'Nuff said. Idiot.

    6. Re:Selection problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although, it is a good place to go to drunk to laugh at the Nascar-related merchandise and the cretins buying it.


      Awwww somebody got stuffed into lockers in high school.


      You keep telling yourself you're better than them... hope it works our for you. Fucking dork.

    7. Re:Selection problems by HungWeiLo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not true - Americans often censor themselves just fine, thank you very much. Walmart will only put items on their shelves which have a 98% sell-through rate. If it's on the shelves, you bet someone's buying it up pretty quickly. Because of that, I don't think the blame can be squarely put on just Walmart - it's just that Americans in general are vanilla brain dead store-goers.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    8. Re:Selection problems by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

      I never get an opportunity to see people like that otherwise.

      Jeez, ya think? And here I thought you might be a practicing Lutheran.

      *grin*

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    9. Re:Selection problems by zaren · · Score: 1

      The reason why I've used Netflix (well, until recently, but that's because I've moved and don't know where I'm going end up for a bit) is so check out some anime... I'd be surprised if Walmart went out of their way to stock titles like that...

      I just cancelled my Netflix service due to lack of jobfullness, which sucks, since I only had about 40 more movies in my queue, most of them anime. (Note that I got my copy of Sakura Wars two weeks after I reported it lost, and a week after I cancelled :D Watched it, sent it back; no harm, no foul apparently.)

      I took a very brief poke at WalMart's dvd catalog, and they have the whole run of both Evangelion *and* Vision of Escaflowne, while (last time I looked) Netflix only had the first four dvd of each. Should I manage to come up with a bit of disposable income again, I might take a stab at Walmart's service, for those two series alone. I'm sure I can at least chew through those during the free trial period :)

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    10. Re:Selection problems by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      then NetFlix can specialize in adult DVDs and Walmart will leave their niche market alone.

    11. Re:Selection problems by JDevers · · Score: 1

      You basically pointed out the error in your own thinking. You assume that Wal-Mart's management is super religious just because of the merchandise they sell??? Wal-Mart stocks what the customers in the area want, no more and no less (assuming legality). I know quite a few people that work at Wal-Mart corporate who are quite liberal (as I considered myself) and none of them complain about the management (middle or upper) being nearly as conservative or religious as you suggest. Obviously Wal-Mart is ultimately interested in the almightly dollar, but name a single fortune 500 company who ISN'T. While Wal-Mart may epitomize this mode of thinking for you, I can actually think of several companies much more money hungry myself. Wal-Mart is just exceedingly good at what it does, they know the consumers in each of their markets better than the consumers probably know their own spending habits.

    12. Re:Selection problems by JonTurner · · Score: 1

      You need to remember that Walmart's customer base isn't the elite boutique-shoppers of either coast or the big-city masses -- it's the salt-of-the-earth types who live in flyover country. (I refer you to the "red" zones on the infamous USAToday Red&Blue map from the last presidental election.) e.g., small-town folks. These people, as a group, have traditional families, Christian beliefs, and conservative viewpoints.

      I am confident that WalMart will make available what their customer base demands. Whether or not you agree with their decisions doesn't matter as, judging from your condesending tone, you are obviously much too self-important to shop at a Walmart store.

    13. Re:Selection problems by NineNine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, they know their customers. But there ARE some things more important than the almighty buck. I run a retail store, and there are plenty of things that I could sell and make a killing on bbut I won't because the products are shit. Wal-Mart will sell anything and everything that they can make money on. I'm picky about what I sell and I still make a decent profit. If their customers wanted pork skins in the shape of Jesus, they'd sell them. I wouldn't.

    14. Re:Selection problems by MrLint · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      you are obivioulsy much to self important to worry about anyone outside of your preception of 'middle of the road'

    15. Re:Selection problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if it makes Netflix bulk up on imports, indie and anime, I'm grateful to WalMart for making my Netflix subscription more valuable to me.

      Search Netflix for "* My Goddess" or "All-Purpose Cultural Cat-Girl Nuku Nuku" and they don't got 'em. Stupid amounts of abject p0rn and Dragonball Z, but no Nuku Nuku or Belldandy.

      Now if only Amazon would start up this kind of scheme leveraging their z-shop affiliates...

      JM (rented the Cowboy Bebop movie from a local import shop because the silly Regal theater monopoly didn't want his money after all... Pain to make the subtitles work right, but so much cheaper!)

    16. Re:Selection problems by MrLint · · Score: 1

      it's just that Americans in general are vanilla brain dead store goers
      I fear that may be the most insightful and most true part of the whole thing.

    17. Re:Selection problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey...we gotta spend all that disposable income we make somewhere....after you run out of major purchases to make....just go to WalMart to go 'slummin' and spend a bit of it there.....

      Oh...no disposable income? Socialist govt. taxing you too heavily for that? VAT makes it too expensive for you...?

      What were we brain dead store goers thinking? How un-sensitive of us to spend our extra money while others in the world don't have any....sorry.

    18. Re:Selection problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We finally saw that over the weekend. What a freat fucking movie.

    19. Re:Selection problems by JDevers · · Score: 1

      And to be perfectly honest, that is why they are Wal-Mart and you run a small retail store.

      Not everything Wal-Mart sells is shit, I think their housewares are crap personally, but they have a function. Other than that, they have decent stuff. An OK selection of electronics when you consider they aren't an electronics store, decent pharmaceutical selection, pretty good food selection.

      If you had customers coming in every day specifically requesting a product that was in the realm of what you sell and you wouldn't sell it then you are doing your customers a disservice. Regardless of how YOU feel about the product, if your customers really want it, you should carry it.

    20. Re:Selection problems by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

      I'm picky about what I sell and I still make a decent profit. If their customers wanted pork skins in the shape of Jesus, they'd sell them. I wouldn't.

      So...it's all right for you to limit your product line (censor your offerings), but it's not all right for Wal*Mart to do the same? And why, exactly, wouldn't you sell Jesus-shaped pork rinds if your customers wanted them? What principle would they violate?

      Wait a sec, I need to remove the needle from my irony detector from it's peg....

      (Incidentally, if their religious zealotry is as strong as you seem to believe, I sincerely doubt they'd be selling said pork rinds. Blasphemy, graven image, all that. But keep playing.)

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    21. Re:Selection problems by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Regardless of how YOU feel about the product, if your customers really want it, you should carry it.


      I disagree completely. Part of my job is to educate the customer, and provide goods that they may never have known existed. If all I sold was stuff that customers wanted, I'd be just like Wal-Mart, which is not my goal. I don't care how many times you walk into a nice French restaurant and ask for a burger and fries, they're not going to have it. Why? It's not their business. They don't want to comete with McDonald's. Maybe they think that hamburgers are bad food, or unhealthy or whatever. If I *really* wanted to make money, I'd own a cigarette/pork rind/beer store and sell to little kids.

    22. Re:Selection problems by JDevers · · Score: 1

      I agree that you should educate the customer and I DEFINITELY don't think you should only sell products that Wal-Mart carries. However, your example is flawed, I said that if you were not carrying a product in the same realm as the other products you carry, burgers and fries are NOT in the same realm as a product a French restaurant would carry. If I went into a nice French restaurant and ordered a nice meal and they told me they didn't have a specific wine that I thought would compliment the meal I wouldn't be happy, but would order something other than that specific wine. If however MANY people starting requesting that specific wine and they still decided not to carry it, I would eventually take my business elsewhere.

      Selling beer and cigarettes to little kids would get you arrested rather quickly so I doubt you would make too much money.

    23. Re:Selection problems by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 1
      These people, as a group, have traditional families, Christian beliefs, and conservative viewpoints.


      And before Wal-Mart, they ran Mom and Pop stores!

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    24. Re:Selection problems by jonhuang · · Score: 1

      Sure, you would take your business elsewhere.. but didn't he already say somethings were more important than money? If he puts ethics before cash, what's wrong with that? (it's not like you can't get your pork rinds elsewhere)

    25. Re:Selection problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello - Mr Pot calling Mr Kettle.

      Your comment seems a bit rich for someone whose sig URL links to porn site advertising.

    26. Re:Selection problems by JDevers · · Score: 1

      However, there are many small towns where Wal-Mart is just about the only game in town. Not all of these towns were "shut down" by Wal-Mart, some where dying just fine on their own and some never HAD anything until Wal-Mart opened in town. So, if Wal-Mart didn't everything the people, en masse, wanted, those people would have to drive to a larger town to get their stuff.

    27. Re:Selection problems by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      Wal-marts standards are not really all that high. Wal-mart sells to it's general audience, and it sells well. When a bad movie, or a bad video game comes around that's any good, they'll sell it despite their "policy". They just didn't want to land in the same trouble as k-mart, who lost it's big market by selling junk books (that didn't sell anyway).

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
  11. Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Zaphod+B · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really don't mean this to be a troll... but it occurs to me that Wal-mart's core customer group are not exactly likely to own DVD players.

    Wal-mart's greatest move (from a financial gain POV) was to move into middling-to-small towns (this means towns with 4000 people or more, or county seats) and take over the businesses downtown, the mom-and-pop stores, by slashing prices. (Whether you like that tactic is irrelevant, it was enormously successful.)

    Well, how much are you going to be able to slash prices on an online DVD rental? It's not like Netflix and Blockbuster are higher-priced than the market will bear.

    They can try it... but I suspect it won't be a roaring success.

    --
    Zaphod B
    When duplication is outlawed, only outlaws will have /bin/cp
    1. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      Walmart's core customer group is definitely likely to own DVD players. If you haven't noticed, Best Buy and Walmart both have DVD sections larger than their VHS sections. I would have agreed with you 3 years ago, when less than 10 people I knew owned DVD players, but now I only know about 10 people who don't have one.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wal-mart's core customer group are not exactly likely to own DVD players

      At $40 or so for a DVD player, who can't afford one?

      Well, how much are you going to be able to slash prices on an online DVD rental?

      I doubt that's the point. People do their grocery shopping at Wal-mart since groceries are there too. Now they won't have to stop by the video store on the way home either.

    3. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Maeryk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I really don't mean this to be a troll... but it occurs to me that Wal-mart's core customer group are not exactly likely to own DVD players.

      You kidding me? Where else can you get a DVD player for 40 bucks? not Rad Shack.. anything they sell has to be at least 80.. or they wont sell it. Walmart can hook you up with a passable home theater for under 500 bucks.. and they stock a fairly reasonable selection of DVDs and videos. (And yes, even pulp fiction, uncut, last time I was there looking).

      So this is the next logical step for them. Super Walmarts have replaced the shopping mall for all intents and purposes. (Sure.. they sell Kmart level CRAP in most cases, but in some instances you can get good deals there.) The one here has a pharmacy, a grocery store, a pearle vision center, automotive, the usual Walmart crap, a decent electronics and sporting goods area, and an outdoors home decor shop. There really isnt any reason to shop anywhere else. (Unless you want to go to home despot for hardware..).

      This is exactly the demographic they want.. the kind of people who are at wal-mart three times a week grocery shopping anyway. The difference between a scheme like this and the ill fated VHS in grocery stores, would be selection.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    4. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      it occurs to me that Wal-mart's core customer group are not exactly likely to own DVD players.

      Not yet, but people will see the DVD rental box and say "hey, we need a DVD player !". And smart kids will say "hey, we need a PC with a DVD burner !"

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Zaphod+B · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected re: the cost of DVD players. However, I think you've misunderstood the point of the article. Wal-mart have done DVD rentals for aeons... what they're talking about HERE is online rental à la NetFlix.

      --
      Zaphod B
      When duplication is outlawed, only outlaws will have /bin/cp
    6. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by uberdave · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think most of WalMart's core customers (middle class urban North Americans) ARE likely to own a DVD player. It's not like they're all that expensive anymore. Most of the ones WalMart sells are below US$200. I don't think the online rental will fly, but I could see an in-store rental scheme working.

    7. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by EisPick · · Score: 1

      but it occurs to me that Wal-mart's core customer group ...

      Hey, Rip Van Winkle, you need to look around a little bit. Wal-Mart's core customer group is everybody. They're the world's largest retailer, the world's largest private employer, and now #1 on the Fortune 500.

    8. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by opeuga · · Score: 0

      > It's not like Netflix and Blockbuster are higher-priced than the market will bear.

      When was the last time you rented something from Blockbuster?

      ope

      --
      ---- http://www.opedog.com/
    9. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "There really isnt any reason to shop anywhere else."

      Unless of course you have any moral sense to avoid an evil corporation that treats its employees like trash.
    10. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by tdrury · · Score: 1

      I don't think you really understand Walmart's customer base. I grew up in rural Georgia. Back in the 80s cable was only available in the larger neighborhoods. Those houses that were in the sticks and the trailer parks couldn't get cable. Those people had huge f'ing satelite dishes and big screen TVs. Entertainment is an escape from reality. The harsher the reality the more money that will be spent on the escape.

    11. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      I agree with you on all points. I recently moved to a small city of about 25,000, and Wal-Mart is the only local store I've found carrying the anniversary edition of "Reservoir Dogs". I don't know what Wal-Marts some slashdotters have been stuck with, but ours carries a good selection of movies, music, and games (even those with, gasp!, explicit lyrics and "mature audience" labels).

      While I may not be an audiophile or home-theater nut, my widescreen version of "Spirited Away" looked great on my small-town Wega TV and sounded good on my small-town Sony DTS surround system.

      Fellow geeks: please don't confuse "lives in a city smaller than than 500,000" with "must be a redneck".

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    12. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Dimitri-san · · Score: 1
      Wal-mart have done DVD rentals for aeons...


      Where does Wal-Mart currently rent DVDs? I've been in many, many Wal-Mart stores up and down the east coast and I have never seen any that *rent* DVDs. Sell for less than one can rent at Blockbuster, sometimes, yes, but never actually rent...

    13. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, get over it. You sound to cities like some guy with a small p saying size doesn't matter. I lived in Chicago and DC, and I'll pick a small city anyday (but I'll take a girl with large, umm, anyways). But that's me.

      *cough*

      As to Walmart, living in a small city, I avoid them. As to getting DVDs, I order mine online. It's cheaper than Walmart, I get a better return policy, I get it in 3-4 days (frequently less since we are near a UPS distribution point and 30 minutes away from a major distributor), and I don't have to deal with people getting paid 15k and pissed off that you're there waiting for them to do the job they got hired for.

      Most of the stuff I find at Walmart I either prefer to buy elsewhere or, strangely, for $10 more, I get a better name brand (quality of product debatable) online. Most of the people I see in Walmart are just clueless folks that don't know what their small city has to offer. They may know the Lowes or Home Depot, but they don't know of the sizable farmer's hardware store 15 minutes away that might carry something they need (in my case, they are the only place that sells many types of hard to find Vise-Grips, such as the welding clamp).

      On the small city note, most of the competent open source folks I know came from small cities, not large cities. Hell, yesterday, I a white VW with Linux, LNX, and RH stickers all over the back of it at the local Wendy's. I was going to pull out the OpenBSD CD and smack him over the head with it (he had a passenger though) as well as have the daemon beat the fluffing out of tux but then he got his order and left, and well, I wanted my order to eat too.

    14. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My business school professor who makes $650 an hour goes to Walmart. Most biz school profs, including Harvard business school professors, highly respect Walmart. In fact, Walmart adapts high tech innovations faster than any other retailer.

      I'd be short selling Netflix if I got the dough. However, I did check Walmart's titles and found many titles are not available. If thier moral standards get in the way, I can see Netflix having a slight differentiation advantage.

    15. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      but it occurs to me that Wal-mart's core customer group are not exactly likely to own DVD players.

      Hmmm...I shop at Wal-mart and I own several DVD players. One of my neighboors (who lives to go shopping at wal-mart at midnight with her 6 year old - if that's not their core customers...) bought a DVD player just because of the Harry Potter DVD.

      Though I do believe that our wal-mart is a little less than typical...compared to other ones I've been in, we seem to have a higher class of person.

      Some of the stuff is crap, but some isn't and you can find some deals sometimes - and it's better than Best Buy.

    16. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by nfg05 · · Score: 1
      I doubt that's the point. People do their grocery shopping at Wal-mart since groceries are there too. Now they won't have to stop by the video store on the way home either.


      Not to be a dick, but where I live Blockbuster bought out the (crappy) video places run by all the Kroger grocery stores in the area so I don't have to stop by the video store after picking up groceries as it is.
    17. Re:Wal-mart's business model won't work well here. by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      ssshhh! He's been buying them, and dropping them back off at the lost and found when he is done watching.

  12. The only problem for me is... by ScottGant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That when I go to rent a movie, it's usually on a spur of the moment thing. It's like I ask my wife "what would you like to do tonight" and she might say I don't know...wanna rent a movie?

    So then we go down to the rental place and look around, not really sure what we want and pick something up and go home THAT NIGHT and watch a movie.

    With renting a movie over the net and having it mailed to you isn't quite what we're looking for. We want something we can see that night, not two days from then...because the way we live two days from then we might be doing something else that comes up etc etc. We live by the seat of our pants and never really plan out little things like movie watching in advance.

    At least, that's how we play it. Is there really that much need for this out there? Just curious.

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    1. Re:The only problem for me is... by s.d. · · Score: 1

      Is there really that much need for this out there?

      If Netflix has 1 million subscribers, then yes, there seems to be a market, and other people (Walmart, Blockbuster, etc) will want to compete for it.

    2. Re:The only problem for me is... by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit of both. I like to watch anime from time to time, so I'll go to Netflix, select the stuff I've heard about and want to watch. Then I watch it, decide if I like it, and mail it back for the next one.

      Most local video stores don't have that selection, or they don't have that one arty-fartsy film I actually care about seeing "someday".

      Local for the new "ultra hot" stuff or just looking for something to watch with my wife, Netflix for the stuff I already know I'd like to see "someday".

    3. Re:The only problem for me is... by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      For me it is to get stuff that they don't have at the rental store. For example Anime. I can get Cowboy Beboop watch it when I can and send it back when I get done. But for spur of the moment stuff we still go to Blockbusters.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    4. Re:The only problem for me is... by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, NetFlix has been setting themselves up for the past few years in a fantastic position to be the first video-on-demand company, when the technology permits. Imagine it from their point of view... You have hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of customers who are generally satisfied with you. Now there's this new-fangled technology that lets people (*gasp*) download movies to their computer for a limited time (for the first week... until the hackers and crackers of the world break that encryption too) and you can watch it immediately! All of a sudden, you have people that own computers, are willing to pay at least $20 a month to you, and who love movies, all waiting at your website for the next video-on-demand title that comes out. From my perspective, it looks like they've been planning it for a long time... and it looks like an excellent plan.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    5. Re:The only problem for me is... by FleshMuppet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Netflix is great for people like me and my roommate. The best part about netflix, IMHO, is the fact that you can keep a DVD for as long as you want it. We were the sort of people who always were paying late fees before Netflix. Now, we can keep it around until we're done with it, and then return it without the effort of even leaving the house.

      And as for your lack of organization issue, remember that you get to keep a certain number of movies on hand. The number varies depending on how much you pay, but if you send your movies back after you watch them, you will have half a dozen DVDs sitting around at any one time that you haven't watched yet.

      So, in other words, next time your wife and you decide on the spur of the moment to go and get a movie, instead of getting in your vehicle and driving to the DVD store, you simply walk over to your DVD player and pick one of the movies that you have lying about that you'd already decided you wanted to watch.

    6. Re:The only problem for me is... by /dev/niall · · Score: 1
      We live by the seat of our pants and never really plan out little things like movie watching in advance.


      Yeah, but those of us who incessantly plan every tedious detail of our lives love crap like this. As long as it works; When my Netflix are late, I often find myself having panic attacks. I have to go wash my hands again now.

      --
      --
    7. Re:The only problem for me is... by stephens_domain · · Score: 1

      It is the same idea, just requires a little advance preparation. Since you do not have due dates, you always have a few movies around that you want to see. You still just watch when the mood strikes you, but you save a trip to and from the rental shop. I do this with PPV and Tivo and don't even have a disc to return, but of course the selection is much more limited.

      --

      ..
    8. Re:The only problem for me is... by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      "We live by the seat of our pants"
      *processing*
      "I don't know...wanna rent a movie?"
      *head explodes*

      Seriously though, netflix appeals to 2 kinds of movie watchers. Those that watch every damn thing ever put on disk and don't really care so much about what they have at any give time. (Farscape season 1 disk 1 just came in and I'm 1/2 through my ST:TNG marathon.) It's binge watching occassionally purged by work and games.

      And those that queue up a bunch of really good (relative of course) movies for the coming weekend and sit on those until watched. This requires a little speculation but I'm pretty sure the woman's gonna want any crap with Hugh Grant or Freddie Prinz or [insert random teenie turd here] in it and I'm gonna want something with spaceships or death.

      So basically, I hold one of my 3 rentals back for squishy time with the gf and the other 2 are cycled as quickly as possible for optimal brain rottage. Either way, I'm saving a ton over the 5 bucks @ BB and even the 4 bucks @ the grocery store.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    9. Re:The only problem for me is... by msheppard · · Score: 1

      Do you understand the model here? You signup for hundreds of movies, and you always have three. You return one, they send you another. So you always have a movie you want to see. You don't have to watch it the second you get it, it costs you no more to watch it 3 months after you get it, but you only get 3 out at a time.

      We've been netflix customers for about a year, and I still goto blockbuster. I don't always rent a movie at blockbuster, but I make a list of the movies I MIGHT have rented and the update my netflix list with these movies.

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
    10. Re:The only problem for me is... by dspfreak · · Score: 1
      We live by the seat of our pants and never really plan out little things like movie watching in advance.

      I live life on the seat of my pants. When there's nothing on TV, it's nice to be able to say "what do we have from Netflix rignt now?" and watch it without having to drag my lazy ass off the couch and head over to rent a video. Having little kids, it's even more of an issue, especially if you decide you want to watch something late at night.

      If you are reasonably diligent at sending the DVDs back after you watch them, you pretty much always have something new to watch (assuming you only watch a couple movies each week). That's nice. It's not like we plan what movies we want to watch which nights. We just keep a queue of 10 or 20 movies we'd like to see and update it once a month or so, and when we get bored we watch whatever we happen to have right then.

      --
      "Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions." -- G. K. Chesterton
    11. Re:The only problem for me is... by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 5, Informative
      That when I go to rent a movie, it's usually on a spur of the moment thing.

      You, my friend, do not have young children. "Hey, let's go get a movie" turns into a two-hour ordeal of car-seats, crying, dropped ice-cream, potty breaks and/or diaper changes, and so on...

      The reality is that you give up a little spontaneity for a lot of convenience. You don't find hopping over to the video store for a movie all that troublesome, but there are plenty of people who do. Having a movie you want to see, right at hand, when you find yourself with a couple of hours of peace is a luxury to a lot of people.

      I work with a guy whose family lives in Alaska. The one video store in town has a pitiful selection. Netflix provides something they simply can't get otherwise.

      As far as movies go, there is a high psychological threshold that has to be reached in order to go rent a movie. Why? Because you have to go, pay on the spot, and are committed to going back within a few days to a week to return the movie. You are less likely to rent something wierd or experiement with different tastes because, well, because, that's just how most people are. But clicking on a movie on the site is low-threshold, and I find myself putting all sorts of odd movies on my netflix list that I would almost certainly never go through the effort to rent at Blockbuster.

    12. Re:The only problem for me is... by HiKarma · · Score: 1

      You need to think of it another way. You can't say, "do you want to rent a movie tonight?" but you can say, "So, do you want to watch a movie tonight?" which is what you really want.

      Yes, you had to pick, in advance, what movies you might like to see. But unlike the video store, you don't pick over what's not rented. You name exactly the movies you really want to see. Then the movie is already in your house, so when you say "do you want to see a movie" it's there. If you don't want to see one, it stays there until you do want to see one.

      You may consider it a bug to have to pick what movies you are interested in before you get the urge to see a movie, but it strikes me as a feature. I already know what movies I am interested in (and if not, the net is the place I woudl go to look at reviews etc. anyway).

      At the video store that matters not. What matters is what they have in stock, and it's very often not the movies I had in mind to watch.

      So if the choice is, "Honey do you want to watch whatever's on hand at the video store tonight?" or "Honey, do you want to watch one of the 3 movies we really want to see that are in our box" I think the latter wins well.

      Even more on the Tivo where you aren't without programming during the exchange period. (Though it only shows you movies that have made it to TV, and only if you catch them in your weekly browse of upcoming films.)

    13. Re:The only problem for me is... by Antisthenes · · Score: 1

      Netflix is obviously not the way to go for impulsive movie renting, unless your whims take about a week to dissipate. If you want to watch an entire TV series, though, it can work out nicely... sometimes. (I'm in the middle of watching Cowboy Bebop, and because some silly twit decided not to return disc 3 in a timely manner, Netflix sent me disc 4, the next item in my queue, instead. Grrrrr.) I've decided a couple times that I didn't really feel like watching a film that I'd picked out a week or two before, and then it took a nearly a week for my next disc to arrive, of course. But, Netflix is advantageous if you don't have a car. ;-) My feelings are mixed, but I'd complain more if I could get to Blockbuster without calling a cab or walking. Maybe I'll just grab the next few Cowboy Bebop sessions off the net... if I get lucky it should only take three or four weeks to download them all.

    14. Re:The only problem for me is... by ErnieD · · Score: 1

      I'm very similar in my movie-watching style. Plus, I don't really watch movies often enough to justify a monthly fee. In fact, I've had a Blockbuster gift card here since Christmas, and it's still got half its value left, it's been months since I've rented everything.

      That's why joining NetFlix has always been a debate for me, cause yeah it's a cool service and I'd LIKE to see more movies, but on the other hand...would I use it enough? Probably not.

      Maybe with Wal-Mart and possibly others joining the game things will get competitive, and the monthly fee will come down to a reasonable price for my watching habits.

      Or maybe someone will introduce something like levels of membership, based on how many DVDs you want to keep at one time or something. Right now NetFlix lets you have up to 3 at a time, what if I just want to be able to keep 1 or 2 around at a time? A prorated membership fee for this sort of thing would work very well for me.

    15. Re:The only problem for me is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With renting a movie over the net and having it mailed to you isn't quite what we're looking for.
      Um, so don't do it.

      Insightful... I see the moderators are smoking the crack again today.

    16. Re:The only problem for me is... by rmayes100 · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, that's why I finally got a satellite dish with a PVR...once they get some more selection on in demand pay-per-view I think the movie rental industry is going to be really hurting. Ultimately both cable and satellite are going to offer a large selection of movies streamed to your TV. If they don't someone else will. I think there will still be a market for purchasing DVDs but I think the movie rental business is in big trouble. NetFlix is cool, I did it for over a year but it really is just a temporary fix for the real problem...the ability to pick any movie you want and have it streamed to your TV for a nominal feeâ¦You get the convenience and the instant gratification.

    17. Re:The only problem for me is... by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

      I've heard this arguement from my bro when I tell him how much I like netflix, and for the most part it is a good one. However it doesn't bother me when I have 5 unwatched movies sitting on my table from netflix. If I have a sudden craving to watch a movie I shuffle through them and pick one. Occasionally I will have the odd desire to see something in a genre I don't have, and at that point guess what I do? I go to the video store and rent it! I think a lot of people balk at going netflix because they think you either rent from netflix or you rent from blockbuster, period. Since you can keep the netflix discs for as long as you want, there is no reason NOT to run to blockbuster if you don't have something in your home already that you want to watch. I am a movie buff, and netflix has been one of the most usefull services I've ever found on the internet.

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    18. Re:The only problem for me is... by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Actualy netflix may come down on there pricing as WallMart is definatly a better deal. But Netflix has had an unadvertized 2 DVD's out 4 DVD a month cap for 14 a month thats fairly reasonable. I Figure thats equivalent to 2 or 3 rentals around here assuming I get them back in time now if they are the usual couple days late that fee is my once a month payment.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    19. Re:The only problem for me is... by angle_slam · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Renting on the spur of the moment does have its advantages. But there are also disadvantages too. For me, the primary disadvantage was planning to see a movie, renting it, then not having time to see it and having to return it unseen.

      With Netflix, I keep my queue filled. If me and my wife have free time, we have three movies (give or take mail delays) to choose from and don't have to leave the house. If we don't have time to watch that day, we can keep the movie for as long as we want, until finally returning it. But if we have a free weekend, we can watch all 3 movies, and merely return them by dropping it off in the mailbox at my office. Very convenient.

      Plus, Netflix has one huge advantage--selection. Your local Blockbuster doesn't have a shot of having the same selection as Netflix. Not a big deal if you only like mainstream movies. But if you are a fan of independent movies, or older movies, or foreign movies, or music concerts--Netflix is for you.

    20. Re:The only problem for me is... by Artifex · · Score: 1
      So, in other words, next time your wife and you decide on the spur of the moment to go and get a movie, instead of getting in your vehicle and driving to the DVD store, you simply walk over to your DVD player and pick one of the movies that you have lying about that you'd already decided you wanted to watch.


      I'm not sure about this, at least not in my case. Whenever I had access to a friend's cd changer, I always wanted a cd not in the selection. When I see jukeboxes in yuppie retro diners, I want music they don't have. I have dozens of DVDs that I've paid for, but have never seen, because "I can always do that later."

      Netflix sounds cool, especially if they carry a lot of arthouse and indie films (I actually expect these genres to get a boost in public tastes as a result of Netflix, just like when the Sundance Channel and IFC started up). But I am still thinking that I'll have this problem of never wanting what I have available :)

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    21. Re:The only problem for me is... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Do you muse about wether or not its pointless for Ford to make Mustangs just because you don't buy them?

    22. Re:The only problem for me is... by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      I read your scenario--and NetFlix actually works better for that than does Blockbuster. I use a NefFlix competitor (DVD Avenue) and my wife and I watch movies exactly as you do: we put DVDs on our list, and then when they are mailed to us, they sit by the TV until we're in the mood to watch either of the two movies standing by. So, we have the same implusive nature, and the similar inclination to just kinda watch a movie, without a strong disposition to any particular movie--but we didn't have to leave our living room to bring the desire to fruition.

      And it's still cheaper to do that than it is to rent a movie, provided we don't want to either a) watch 3 movies in 3 days or b) watch at least 6 movies a month. If you're in that spot, you might want to give NetFlix another look, as they suit our viewing habits which are much more like yours than you seem to think

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    23. Re:The only problem for me is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am like that too but I've seen everything in all 3 local Blockbusters. Now what to do?

  13. This is off topic, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a store anywhere in the known universe that has a fatter clientel than Walmart?

    1. Re:This is off topic, but... by lordleyton · · Score: 1

      I object to this I am not fat and I always shop at Walmart simple they are cheaper...However why would I need them for an on line service. The service is bad enough in the store. And yes you are right it is full of large folks wearing lycra!

    2. Re:This is off topic, but... by NeB_Zero · · Score: 1

      yes, richard's big and tall in Indianapolis.

      dick.

    3. Re:This is off topic, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Around here the Walmart is a white trash magnet. I once witnessed the dregs of humanity (aka "The Great Unwashed") standing around listening to a sales pitch (a la infomercials, but worse) so they could get a 3 inch paring knife for free (plastic handle, bendable "blade").

    4. Re:This is off topic, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ain't that the truth. Here in Orange County, it's mostly rich yuppies with their trophy wives. Driving around and going to normal public places, you'd think that's all we have here. Even places like Target are full of yuppies driving their beamers. But head over to Wal-Mart, and it's white trash city! That and lots of hispanics (I don't say this as a bad thing, just an observation, so don't even scream at me for not being "p-c"). Even with Wal-Marts around, I wonder how these whales with their 5 screaming brats in tow can afford to live in OC...

  14. It's bad for cable companies, though by HiKarma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have always felt of things like NetFlix, and even the Tivo, as a "poor man's video on demand."

    You pick the movies you want, and some time, a few days later they are there to watch at your leisure, taking as long as you want, with pause, rewind FF.

    Everything you want from video on demand except the ability to pick a movie right now and watch it right now.

    Which turns out to be not so important after all. And it's a lot cheaper than putting in all those servers and 7 megabits to every home of highly reliable bandwidth.

    Another example of the old adage that you should never underestimate the bandwidth of a stationwagon full of magtapes, except this time it's a postal van full of DVDs.

    1. Re:It's bad for cable companies, though by Malic · · Score: 1

      "Another example of the old adage that you should never underestimate the bandwidth of a stationwagon full of magtapes, except this time it's a postal van full of DVDs."

      Heh, I think I know what book YOU read! Sounds like the "Tanenbaum Text" to me! ;)

      --
      I swear by MacOS X. Although I use to swear *at* MacOS 9...
    2. Re:It's bad for cable companies, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Tanenbaum "

      Nobody reads that trash anymore. Tanenbaum is obsolete!

    3. Re:It's bad for cable companies, though by MasterD · · Score: 1

      Netflix pushes almost as much bandwidth per day as the entire Internet. They push 1.5TB/day while the whole Internet is 2.0TB/day. See this slashdot story.

    4. Re:It's bad for cable companies, though by MasterD · · Score: 1
      They push 1.5TB/day while the whole Internet is 2.0TB/day.

      OOPS! Multiply those numbers by 1000.

    5. Re:It's bad for cable companies, though by passion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's not full-duplex...

      --
      - passion
  15. This may not be a catastrophe. by dirtyboot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not *too* worried about this. I think Netflix customers are probably somewhat saavier than your standard Wal*Mart customer. Granted, Wal*Mart has the advantage of being able to pour money into the program (a la Microsoft's Ultimate TV) and the advantage of brick 'n' mortar stores to push the product, but if they play the same censoring games as they do with their music, I don't see them taking off. Hell, even Blockbuster is beginning to see the original-aspect-ration light.

    If Netflix embarks on an even semi-intelligent ad campaign, I think they have a fighting chance.

    -d

    1. Re:This may not be a catastrophe. by MDMurphy · · Score: 1
      If Netflix embarks on an even semi-intelligent ad campaign, I think they have a fighting chance.

      Semi-intelligent? Would that be something smarter than paying the penis enlarger type spammers to flood us with offers again? That's the savy customers they signed up, the ones who replied to those emails?

      I signed up for Walmart's service today, just because they aren't Netflix. They boosted their IPO with a spam campaign, so I just want to see them whither and go away.

    2. Re:This may not be a catastrophe. by dirtyboot · · Score: 1

      Okay. Enjoy your special "Heartland Edition" of Pulp Fiction in all of its pan-n-scan glory and that rumbling stereo soundmix. Running time? Approximately 1 minute and 37 seconds. They made a few small changes.

      -d

  16. Thanks, but No Thanks by Jack+Comics · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Gee, just what I always wanted! A censored DVD rental company! Sigh. I have lost complete and total respect for Wal-Mart over the years. First they started flexing their muscles to censor the video game industry and made it plain that any video game they didn't like wouldn't be sold by Wal-Mart, thus making game companies cave and self-edit their games. Then they pulled some men's magazines off their shelves that had less female skin than most women's magazines these days. Now they want to start renting out DVDs, which I'm quite sure are censored? Heh, good luck.

    It's a shame they're the largest employer in Pennsylvania. :( In the meantime, I'll stick to Target, at least they seem to let consumers decide for theirselves, instead of deciding for the consumers what's right and what's not.

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "In the meantime, I'll stick to Target, at least they seem to let consumers decide for theirselves, instead of deciding for the consumers what's right and what's not."

      Ahh, the wonders of capitalism!

    2. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know the ONLY peope who bitch about Walmart's CDs are punk kids that whine because mommy wont take them to the mall.

      Everyone else who is older than 16 simply buy them at media play or other record stores...

      Oh yeah... Emineimem is so revolutionary... only a genius can say F**King C**T over and over ...

      get a clue, grow out of your potty mouth stage and mature a little.... get your msuic from a real store and not a kiddie store.

    3. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by NotTheAntiChrist · · Score: 1

      Maybe netflix can stay afloat by doing for porn what they did for "regular" rentals ;) Although I'm sure they already rent porn, they'll just have to change their image a little bit more.. Porn sells. Well.

    4. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      You missed a step.

      Wal-Mart is now either hiding, or not selling some magazines such as Cosmo, Elle, and so on because of too much skin on them.

      That happened last week.

    5. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Maeryk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gee, just what I always wanted! A censored DVD rental company! Sigh. I have lost complete and total respect for Wal-Mart over the years. First they started flexing their muscles to censor the video game industry and made it plain that any video game they didn't like wouldn't be sold by Wal-Mart, thus making game companies cave and self-edit their games. Then they pulled some men's magazines off their shelves that had less female skin than most women's magazines these days. Now they want to start renting out DVDs, which I'm quite sure are censored? Heh, good luck.


      YEah! I DEMAND streaming porn on the projector at elementary schools! Who is WalMart to tell us what they will and wont sell! HOW DARE THEY have some morals and make decisions that they feel protect their clientele!

      Sheesh.. the NERVE of walmart to think that someone like me may not want my six year old son asking why a mostly naked wrestling chick is on the front cover of STUFF magazine in the checkout line! (Stacy Kiebler.. next month).

      Well.. I think I'll take my dollar right down to the local dark wank-in-the-back porn shop to show my outrage! (end sarcastic rant).

      Dude.. its their store. They can sell, or not sell, whatever the hell they want. If you dont like it, dont shop there, but dont act like its some crime against humanity that Wal-mart doesnt carry pimply faced teenager prot0-spank material at their registers anymore.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    6. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by jsgates · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Theirs just one problem with that, because Wal*Mart is so large, when they refuse to carry a product unless it meets their criteria, it severly hurts buisness for that company. Whats that mean? It means before the majority of magazines/etc publish their magazines, they send a preview copy to Wal*Mart to make sure it meets their standards of publication. Basicaly you end up with censorship by market dominance.

    7. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is" contracts to "there's", not "theirs", you mindless simian.

    8. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by zeruch · · Score: 1

      well, wal-mart probably will not stock much of what Netflix does outside fo the obvious big titles(foreign films, art films, documentaries that arent about battlebot lookalikes or other such ilk). Whether Netflix wishes to consign themselves to such a small et of niche markets remains to be seen. They certainly will not carry things like uncut anime or even good fmous foreign directors like Akira Kurosawa I would wager...

      there is still hope.

    9. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by mattsucks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, Wallyworld can sell whatever they want, measured against whatever corporate standards of decency they so choose.

      But it still saddens me. Here's why, and I've seen this happen over and over and over. Walmart moves in to a community. All the smaller book/record/video/newsstand stores go out of business; they just can't compete. Then all that is left for that community at that point, in an EASILY ACCESSIBLE FORM, is Walmart's definition of "decent".

      Yes, I can "shop somewhere else", but what if there IS nowhere else?

      Is it legal? I believe it is. Competition == good. It's the American Way (tm). We should all be so lucky.

      It is good for the community? I believe it is not.

      Also sad is Wallyworld's penchant for pressuring publishers and distributors to modify their books/records/videos/etc before they will stock them. That to me falls solidly in a gray area of legality. Sure, the distributors can go elsewhere if they don't want to edit ... but where the hell else can they go?

      Sure I can write a better browser ... but when all that exists is Windows+IE where the hell can I run it?

    10. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why you son will grow up craving that half-clad women like that seen on the front cover of Stuff.

    11. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...
      Google.com
      "Stacy Kiebler"
      Did you mean: Stacy Keibler
      Click.
      Hey, nice. Thanks!

    12. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://hometown.aol.com/jkayedesigns/SKS.html

      Here.. the aformentioned spread from Stuff..

      I guess someone knows someone. (or at least thats how it was presented to me.)

      M

    13. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by invenustus · · Score: 1
      First they started flexing their muscles to censor the video game industry and made it plain that any video game they didn't like wouldn't be sold by Wal-Mart, thus making game companies cave and self-edit their games.


      Are we talking about the same Wal-Mart that sold me Grand Theft Auto: Vice City?
      --
      grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    14. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

      I believe that the frustration most people feel towards Wal-Mart lies within two realms:

      • Only available local store
        Many people in smaller towns are frustrated by the homogeneity of local selection. Wal-Mart is the biggest example of that around, so it's easy to vent at them. You might as well complain at the smaller stores for not experimenting a bit (they don't have much to lose if Wal-Mart is in town), or the locals for not supporting alternatives.
      • Bowdlerizing
        This is the camp that I fall into. I believe that a movie should be in line with your standards concerning watchability by itself, not after editing; therefore, I do not approve of removing content from movies[1]. Wal-Mart does this (at least, they did last time I checked. Blockbuster is bad about this as well). In addition to this annoyance, often times the fact that the movie is edited is not apparent on the box (mostly to not mess with the artwork), so I never know if I'm seeing the movie or not.

      Finally, Wal-Mart has been known to carry enough weight to cause censorship in movies for the theatrical release version (it's expensive to make two versions and doesn't really please anyone, and Wal-Mart likes to have a large selection of movies to sell). That bothers me.

      So, it's not really a problem with Wal-Mart's decision of what to sell and not sell, and I salute their intent if not their actions.

      Also, I would like to add that those of us who decry censorship do not advocate "streaming porn on the projector at elementary schools." I know your statement was hyperbole, but it reflects upon an important issue: it's not that we want universal availability of all media to minors (after all, that would be trampling upon the rights of their guardians, who are supposed to be raising the kids, after all). For myself, I would like more in-depth information on movies (ScreenIt does a wonderful job here, but she's only one gal and there's a lot of movies out there), and I would like for parents to be able to give kids the freedom to access more at the parents' discretion.

      I'd be interested in hearing your opinion on this, as you have a differing one from mine.

      [1] I also believe in the creation of an artist (no matter how bad), and that the only good reason not to watch all of a piece of art is if you're not enjoying it.

    15. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      Bowdlerizing
      This is the camp that I fall into. I believe that a movie should be in line with your standards concerning watchability by itself, not after editing; therefore, I do not approve of removing content from movies[1]. Wal-Mart does this (at least, they did last time I checked. Blockbuster is bad about this as well). In addition to this annoyance, often times the fact that the movie is edited is not apparent on the box (mostly to not mess with the artwork), so I never know if I'm seeing the movie or not.


      But have they actually done this? Can you actually show me one instance where it has happened? I have a _very_ hard time believing that the DVD copy of Scarface I pick up at Walmart is any different from the copy I pick up at Suncoast, or CDnow.. can you give me an actual example where WalMart.. not the studio but WalMart.. ordered the editing of the movie?

      I'd be interested in hearing your opinion on this, as you have a differing one from mine.

      But what you are decrying is not censorship. Censorship means it is removed from you.. you cannot get it. you most certainly can still get that version of the movie (if it exists) somewhere else. Walmart just chooses not to carry it. there is a huge difference from one to the other. After all, it is the studio that is making the changes to the film.. not walmart.. and they might well be doing it at walmarts request.. but it is still the person making the product that is making the changes.

      I will make an example. I am a woodworker. I make boxes based in medieval examples that still survive. I tend not to stain or paint them, rather I oil them. If someone says to me "Please make me one in hot pink" I might. However, if someone buys three, paints them with greatful dead insignia (smelly hippies!@) and sells them as a Maeryk Original, they arent. That is what I mean. I might do it for the money.. I might not.. but that is completely different from some second party doing it and marketing it as original. I have yet to see any proof of that.

      but I have no objection to Walmart choosing not to carry certain things. And as much hyperbole as you want to call it, I have a 10 year old, and another child on the way. I try to listen to what my son listens to, and pay attention to it and discuss it with him. but he heard "Stan" somewhere.. and came home terribly upset asking about it. he didnt hear the "dope rhymes" or the backstory.. he just heard about the dead girl off the bridge (or whatever.. I personally hate Eminem..). I would probably sooner let him listen to GWAR than I would most rap artists, or slutty girl bands. (He happens to love Rammstein.. but if he ever learns german, I am probably in trouble!)

      But theres a line on what you are calling censorship.. if they must carry the original unedited re-release of Apocalypse now, with the ox sacrifice, and the other narsty scenes, whats to stop them "having" to carry Angel heart, with the bloody sex scene? And then how bout Black Velvet. (blue velvet? I think velvet was in the title.. ). And if they are going to carry that, why not Behind the Green Door.. and hell.. some veronica moser stuff..

      Its not like you cant find these things other places.. but walmart is aiming at a very MOR crowd.. not deviants, and not morons really. (Although the stereotype tends to run a bit true.. but hell.. people with no money tend to shop at that kind of place.. if you think walmart is bad, let me take you to a Pennsylvania Dutch Farmers Market sometime.. ).
      If X town has people who want porn, or want punk rock gear, or want high end bicycle parts, or whatever that is not "MOR mainstream" they will find another place to get them, or some brilliant person will open a store selling them and make a killing.

      Fortunately, the free market system does tend to even itself out. YOu may not be able to compete on things that Walmart moves in bulk.. simply because of the sheer quantity they move.. but there are plenty of things they _dont_ carry.
      You cant compete on their turf.. but specialization is the key.. and many stores are suceeding despite walmarts hulking mass on the horizon.

      )You did ask my opinion, right?(

      maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    16. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

      >Bowdlerizing

      >[...]

      But have they actually done this? [...]Can you give me an actual example where WalMart.. not the studio but WalMart.. ordered the editing of the movie?

      Pardon, I misspoke. What I intended to convey was that I do not like bowdlerizing movies, and by extension the carrying of those movies as the selection in a store. It does not matter to me who is doing it. Again, I don't think that movies should be edited until they are appropriate, they should be appropriate to begin with, or not.

      However, I'm making it sound like I wish for this to be forbidden, and nothing could be further from the truth. I am merely stating why I do not buy movies from Wal-Mart. That's all.

      My earlier post was an attempt to summarize the problems people have with Wal-Mart in order to show that it is not the censorship that's the issue at heart (witness my statement "You might as well complain at the smaller stores for not experimenting a bit (they don't have much to lose if Wal-Mart is in town), or the locals for not supporting alternatives.").

      This leads me to your next point:

      Censorship means it is removed from you.. you cannot get it. you most certainly can still get that version of the movie (if it exists) somewhere else. Walmart just chooses not to carry it. there is a huge difference from one to the other.[split for comment -ed]

      Fine by me. I very much support stores being more than just warehouses --- Wal-Mart has an identity: people know that if they buy movies there that it won't be porn. That's great. I still wish they wouldn't sell or request the making of a censored version, not because I think it's wrong, but because I think it makes the point less "Family Friendly" and more "Family Friendly Because We've Cut Out Everything You Might Not Like" (much like when USA showed Animal House a few years ago. The movie was much shorter and there were a lot of lips moving where different voices were coming out. It didn't stop it from being a raunchy film, it just made it a superficially clean one. Bleaching, if you will). But I will by no means try to get a law passed keeping Wal-Mart from doing it.

      [resume -ed]After all, it is the studio that is making the changes to the film.. not walmart.. and they might well be doing it at walmarts request.. but it is still the person making the product that is making the changes.

      Yes, ultimately we must take responsibility for what we do; However, it is still Wal-Mart's decision that a recut movie is acceptable while the original is not.

      And as much hyperbole as you want to call it, I have a 10 year old, and another child on the way. I try to listen to what my son listens to, and pay attention to it and discuss it with him.

      I am sorry, it seems to be my day for giving the wrong impression. I'll make another attempt: what I want is for you to have good and accurate information on the media out there and the ability to permit your child to see what you think is ok.

      For the first, I think the current rating systems are just plain awful. They convey next to nothing. I gave the example of ScreenIt as a good (and free, no less) service that does this, and I hope that it catches on and similar things come out. My problem with most family rating systems --- that I have seen --- is that they do not give you the information to make your own decision. Rather, they give age ranges or pulpit pounding. That's okay if that's what you want, but I really don't think there's enough good information out there right now.

      Of course, the best thing is to keep track of what's going on yourself, as you are, so that's great. But it's not always possible.

      Secondly, I dislike laws and regulations that set blanket denials on minors without regard to what the parents think is ok. Again, my problem is with the lack

    17. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      [1]Here I'd like to add a point about capitalism and freedom to see if you agree with me: it's important to keep "dencency" and other censorship laws as local as possible so as to allow capitalism to work its dynamics in as fluid a way as possible. It also makes for better definitions of "pornography" and other tricky words. What do you think?

      Yes.. I have to agree. Pornography laws are actually SUPPOSED to be "local". Community Standards are what they call it. And that used to mean something. But now that Infinity and Clear Channel own what.. 80%? of radio, and syndicate everyone to hell and back, its meaningless. Stern or Imus could certainly (and did certainly) get away with far more just in NYC than they can in Podunk Iowa or Salt Lake City. But the problem with a global society is that legislators feel they have to protect everyone, everywhere. (And totally remove those peoples ability to think for themselves.. or decide what they want their kids to know.)

      I do agree with you on that.. and I also do _not_ think a naked woman is pornography. Well, lemme clarify a bit.. an non lurid naked woman. (See, also: medieval art..). HOwever, a lot of what is passing for "art" these days is pornography. Unfortunately, I think the world has done a flip-flop. THe day a woman can get escorted off a plane by air marshals for breast feeding, because a man across the aisle felt sexually harassed, and Maplethorpe gets an NEA grant so he can stick a whip up his ass, we have become Rome. And it has to end soon.

      (The breast feeding thing was related on pregnancy BBS that my wife reads.. I do not doubt its truth).

      But yes.. I agree with you.. it is up to the parent/consumer to decide what they want to watch/read/listen to. (or their kids, for that matter). I doubt my child will be allowed to watch a Mickey Rourke movie until he is 17 or 18.. simply because the content is not what I want him exposed to. I also think the ending of the second Harry Potter movie was a bit more grisly than it needed to be.. I saw a number of rather disturbed children in that theater when I went to see it.. so the ratings system obviously doesnt work. And now the movie companies are using it as advertised. "Rated R for graphic vampire violence and doe eyed love slave sexuality!". It is just as much a joke as the "parental advisory" stickers were.. bands IMMEDIATELY starting working towards picking them up for themselves because it was a guaranteed sale to rebellious youth.

      Again, I think ti is much more a personal choice thing, and should be. Not legislated morality.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    18. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Would it really be so much trouble to ask the lady to simply pump some milk beforehand and feed the baby from a bottle while on a flight?

      I just don't understand this obsession with breasteeding in public by some women. Aren't they worried about the perverts out there like me who would stare at them inappropriately until they feel dirty or even worse the violent out of control whackos who may become aroused to the point of attacking them? (I'm not like this second group of guys).

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    19. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      Would it really be so much trouble to ask the lady to simply pump some milk beforehand and feed the baby from a bottle while on a flight?

      From what I saw, it wasnt a "planned" thing.. the child began screaming, and the only way she could find to make it calm down was feed it. Now, I agree.. if she had simply asked the stewardess for a blanket, there probably wouldnt have been an issue.. but still.

      I just don't understand this obsession with breasteeding in public by some women. Aren't they worried about the perverts out there like me who would stare at them inappropriately until they feel dirty or even worse the violent out of control whackos who may become aroused to the point of attacking them? (I'm not like this second group of guys).

      I simply dont understand why someone would stare inapropriately at someone who is doing somethign the way nature intended it, and doing something significantly proven to be more healthy for the child. Are you 12? Are you the kind of person who sits in an art museum and giggles and goes "BOOBIES!" and punches your buddy in the shoulder when you see a Reubens painting? Im just curious. And if some violent out of control whacko decided to attack a breast feeding woman, I would certainly hope someone would penetrate his cranium with enough copper jacketed lead to keep it from being an issue in the future. (Hence, self solving problem).

      I really dont understand what problem people have with breastfeeding. Theres nothing dirty about boobs, and it works for every other animal with nipples on the planet, so why not for us?

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    20. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      "I simply dont understand why someone would stare inapropriately at someone who is doing somethign the way nature intended it, and doing something significantly proven to be more healthy for the child. Are you 12? Are you the kind of person who sits in an art museum and giggles and goes "BOOBIES!" and punches your buddy in the shoulder when you see a Reubens painting? Im just curious. "

      Other than the fact that I'm 23 instead of 12, yes to all of your questions.

      "I really dont understand what problem people have with breastfeeding. Theres nothing dirty about boobs, and it works for every other animal with nipples on the planet, so why not for us?"

      There is no problem with it. But if I can't get a BJ in public, then I don't think breasts should be bared in public either (even though its legal for a woman to go shirtless since a man can too in public on the street)

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    21. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than the fact that I'm 23 instead of 12, yes to all of your questions

      But you seem proud of that. I am so so very sorry to hear that.

      "I really dont understand what problem people have with breastfeeding. Theres nothing dirty about boobs, and it works for every other animal with nipples on the planet, so why not for us?"

      There is no problem with it. But if I can't get a BJ in public, then I don't think breasts should be bared in public either (even though its legal for a woman to go shirtless since a man can too in public on the street)


      Dude.. you are posting to ./ about breastfeeding and you giggle and go "boobies" when you see classic art. I dont think "in public" is the operative there.. I think its "If I can't get a BJ" and with your pride in being an uncultured boob, I would worry about that before I worried about a woman breastfeeding.

      to put it another way, ever stare at my wife to make her feel "dirty" while she is breastfeeding, and expect to have 200 lbs of me in your face like white on rice.

    22. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      There is no problem with it. But if I can't get a BJ in public, then I don't think breasts should be bared in public either (even though its legal for a woman to go shirtless since a man can too in public on the street)

      Ahh.. therein lies the rub. You cannot see a womans breasts as anything but a sexual object. THe male organ has two purposes.. both of which are against the law in public, but the breasts are not a sexual organ.. they are a sexual characterstic, and their functional purpose is not sexual. But you cant differentiate that.

      WHich explains the "boobies" comments. And you are probably a fan of hardcore porn, as well.
      (Not that thats a bad thing, but it is definately a demographic thing)

      maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    23. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      I got news for you pal. Everyone from perverts in unlit alleys to so-called pillars of communities (executives, preachers, politicans) are into hardcore porn. The difference is that the perverts are honest about it while everyone else just lies.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    24. Re:Thanks, but No Thanks by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      I'm not stupid. I don't make stare inappropriately at breastfeeding women when I am alone. I do it when I am with a group of friends since occassionaly they DO have boyfriends/husbands. There is never an intent to harm, just to make em move on and reconsider public breast showing in the future.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  17. i don't know by zoloto · · Score: 1

    Customers order the movies online. Wal-Mart sends them from six distribution points, reaching 90 percent of the nation within two days, the company says


    this usually means i have to wait a couple of days? WHen you and your spouse/bf/gf have that spur of the moment movie itch, this won't help... unless they can burn the dvd as you wait in the store. . now that would be good
    1. Re:i don't know by NerdSlayer · · Score: 1

      this usually means i have to wait a couple of days? WHen you and your spouse/bf/gf have that spur of the moment movie itch, this won't help...

      Hi, this is reality knocking. I don't know what rock you've been living under, but consider finding out what NetFlix is and how it works before adding your 2 cents.

    2. Re:i don't know by zoloto · · Score: 1

      if you hadn't noticed, this was a comment against walmart and nowhere in the post was anything about netflix. just because i don't make every sentance explicitly clear isn't a sign i didn't RTFA.

      learn to read before posting please.

    3. Re:i don't know by NerdSlayer · · Score: 1

      Hey dumbass, netflix works the same way. It takes a while to get the movies through them, too. So actually, it was about Netflix's business model. Just like it was about Walmart's business model.

  18. Now just need 10 moves per year worth seeing by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 1, Troll

    These services are great. But there is so little worth seeing. I barely watch TV anymore for the same reason.

  19. Wal-Mart and family unfriendly content by astrashe · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Unless Wal-Mart can do something a lot better than Netflix, I'd be reluctant to switch.

    Wal-Mart has been in the news recently for covering up Cosmopolitan magazine. Are they going to push movie suppliers for reedited versions of films, the way Blockbuster has done?

    I know that most people won't look at it this way, and Wal-Mart is an 800-lb gorilla that will probably squash Netflix. But I can't imagine Wal-Mart's politics not getting in the way of their ability to do a good job in this business.

    1. Re:Wal-Mart and family unfriendly content by Koozie · · Score: 1

      So far I've been very happy with the service provided by Netflix. Like you, I'm not planning to switch.

      I must admit I do welcome the competition. I'm interested to see what Walmart or Blockbuster will add to make their service more appealing.
      - price
      - speed(how close is the distro center)
      - web interface.

      koozie.org

    2. Re:Wal-Mart and family unfriendly content by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      I would be willing to bet that Walmart won't follow the 'frequent renter = longer delay' policy that Netflix has. Walmart can easily afford to stockpile more movies than Netflix can, allowing them to fulfill orders faster. That damn policy of Netflix's is the only reason I'm no longer their customer. First come-first serve is the way it should be.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Wal-Mart and family unfriendly content by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Check this out, if you want to see how family friendly Wal-Mart is.

      They're only Chinese, but I'm sure they've got families.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    4. Re:Wal-Mart and family unfriendly content by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Unless Wal-Mart can do something a lot better than Netflix, I'd be reluctant to switch.

      What I'm waiting for is that monthly subscription price to cover both rental models. That way I can either use the online order/deliver/return model or just stop by the local store to pick up one of the more popular titles and just have them count it towards my online account. Being able to return movies at a local store and have them counted as returned immediately would also be a bonus.

    5. Re:Wal-Mart and family unfriendly content by superyooser · · Score: 1
      Right, Wal-Mart is to blame for the poor living conditions in China.

      Newsflash: Life is hard in Communist countries. There are political reasons why those conditions exist in places like China and Cuba but not in America or Britain, and it has nothing to do with Wal-Mart. Consider that if Wal-Mart was not providing jobs there, these people's wages might be $0.00/day.

  20. Censorship by blackmonday · · Score: 1, Redundant

    With Walmart's track record in "mature" movies and video games, I have to wonder whether they will carry unrated and NC-17 movies in their original versions, or employ a Blockbuster type policy where the studio must make movies fit "Rated R" or below. I've been pretty happy with Netflix, and I naturally distrust a company with shameless business practices like Walmart. Search google for "Walmart Sweatshops" if you're curious.

    1. Re:Censorship by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Walmart.com doesn't have the same censorship practices or policies, most likely because the only reason for the B&M restriction policies is that they were/are beating K-mart into the ground for not being "family friendly".

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  21. Good news by unixwin · · Score: 1

    More competition, more power to the consumer. If you think I'm kidding see what intel offers today compared to when AMD wasn't around and ofcourse the price. Do you even think that their processors would be around the $400 mark if there was no AMD?

    --
    -- everyones not everybody and neither is everybody like everyone.
    1. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? I wouldn't use Intel's garbage even if they paid me.

  22. Except in NYC by sporty · · Score: 1

    Is there a walmart in NYC? We got a lot of people here ya' know. Come to think of it, I didn't see one in san francisco.

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    1. Re:Except in NYC by ran-o-matic · · Score: 1

      The nearest Wal-Marts to my Times Square office are in NJ - Linden and Union. They're EVERYWHERE!

    2. Re:Except in NYC by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      Guess I won't be takin gthe MTA that way. Heh, MTA, not going your way.. or at least to walmart.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

  23. The real question, though... by mhore · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Wal-mart does sell R-rated movies (last time I checked)... but I wonder if Wal-mart will do any kind of severe content selection? We all know how they fark up the music they sell there. Wonder if they'll not rent certain kinds of movies (NC-17, and some of the more R R-rated movies).

    --

    Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    1. Re:The real question, though... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      We all know how they fark up the music they sell there.

      Kind of like how you fucked up the spelling of "fuck"? Was your post censored by Wal-Mart?

    2. Re:The real question, though... by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1
  24. bad for business? by Maeryk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How exactly is this bad for business? Is it bad for business like Canon coming out with copiers was bad for Xerox business? You know, where it drove the exhorbitant price of copiers down to where most of us have them built into our 300 dollar printer? Yeah.. I see how bad that has been for Xerox.

    Its not "bad" for business, it is just business. It is competition. If walmart undercuts NetFlix by .50c, netflix can A) price to match, B) add a benefit that makes their slightly higher-than-the-otherguy price worth it, C) go out of business. Either way, its good for the consumer, and thats pretty much the bottom line.

    I tend to not shop Amazon, beause I dont like thier policies, and i can usually find something at close to the same price. (And, I can usually get brick and mortar stores to match Amazon's price to get my sale.) I suspect the same thing will happen here. A lot of people DONT LIKE Wal-Mart.. and wont rent from them. But anything that kills BLockbuster and 48Hours is good, imho. I still think the ridiculously high price that they charge for DVD's will come down as people find it cheaper to rent them enough to get tired of them.
    (Okay.. so its not so ridiculous anymore, but why does it seem the more successful the film in the theaters, the cheaper it is to get, but it costs three times that for something that is slightly more obscure? The costs of production of the DVD's should be about the same, shouldnt they?)

    maeryk

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    1. Re:bad for business? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      its bad for business if the competion is unfair. WAL-MART has a history of unfair practices.

      IT is substantioally cheaper to make 10 million DVDs then 1 million.per DVD of course.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:bad for business? by Lazar+Dobrescu · · Score: 1
      Its not "bad" for business, it is just business. It is competition. If walmart undercuts NetFlix by .50c, netflix can A) price to match, B) add a benefit that makes their slightly higher-than-the-otherguy price worth it, C) go out of business. Either way, its good for the consumer, and thats pretty much the bottom line.

      Well, when smaller companies compete against the likes of Wal-Mart, usually you can be pretty sure C) will happen. And then, Wal-Mart is alone. No competition. No competition = bad. They can then raise the prices up to whatever highest price they know the customers will still accept.

      Here in Canada, big oil companies did that. We had a lot of independant gas station owners that kept the gas price at a reasonable price. Then one day, the big guys thought they'd like to lose the competition, so they lowered their price so ridicully low, much lower than the price they themselves paid for the gas. With their big money, they could take the loss for a while, and all the independant guys were forced out of business. Then, with no competition left, the big ones raised their prices, a little at a time, to heights never known before here. And no one could do a thing about it. And no one wants to start an independant station anymore, as they know they risk getting hit by the same trick, and losing all their money...

      Don't think that Wal-Mart or other big multinationals are the kind of companies to suffer any competition. They'll crush it, and then collect.

    3. Re:bad for business? by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      Well, when smaller companies compete against the likes of Wal-Mart, usually you can be pretty sure C) will happen. And then, Wal-Mart is alone. No competition. No competition = bad. They can then raise the prices up to whatever highest price they know the customers will still accept.

      Im not so sure about that. Retail is a tricky thing. I stopped shopping at Kmart long before we had a Wal-mart here, simply because Kmart sold pure crap. It fell apart a week after you bought it. Ames was another one.. slightly better quality, but they never had thier "sales" things in stock, and I had rainchecks rot on the refrigerator waiting for the item in question to come in. Not to mention a 70% off sale with only one register open. All day.

      Same problem Kmart had towards the end. (or currently, which pretty much _is_ towards the end).

      Wall mart looked kinda poised for a takeover.. but no! Here comes TARGET! the great white savior! (who is usually trumpeted as our champion, yet engaged in exactly the same business practices in the west that Walmart engaged in here in the south and east.)

      There will always be competition of one kind or another.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  25. Netflix bent over to collect Sales Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a customer of Netflix since four years ago.

    These bastards started collecting sales tax here in Florida about three years ago; sissy pushovers found it easier to ram me than to stand up for an internet free of tax.

    I will be jumping into Wal-Mart's embrace ASAP. I couldn't do it before, but will now.

    1. Re:Netflix bent over to collect Sales Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These bastards started collecting sales tax here in Florida about three years ago; sissy pushovers found it easier to ram me than to stand up for an internet free of tax.

      "Stand up?" Oh, you must mean "break the law." If they're taking taxes from you, it's probably because they're required to by law -- maybe they're stationed in Florida, or maybe there are specific laws governing Internet sales to Florida.

      They're a big corporation, and if they engaged in tax evasion it'd probably be difficult for them to escape notice. Their refusal to stand up for your beliefs makes financial sense; it certainly would cost them a lot more than the couple of bucks, tops, that you're having to pay on top of the monthly fees.

      I'm not sure that Walmart *won't* charge sales tax, or that it'll be able to permanently get away with not charging it. I know that there was a question for a long time about whether Barnes and Noble would have to charge sales tax since it actually had physical stores across the US. This same condition will probably apply to Walmart. Of course, with a corporation that large I'm sure they've figured out a way to get around that loophole. Or they can legislate it away.

      Frankly, it disturbes me that people are so ready to jump on the Walmart bandwagon for what to me seem very trivial reasons -- extra sales tax? Pop-up ads? I don't go to Walmart. Honestly, I don't care if they're a "good" company or a "bad" company (although there is plenty of evidence that they've been harmful in many areas), but I just don't want to see an America that is 5% Walmart. That just seems really gross to me.

      For those of you who still don't get it: Walmart is to Retail as Microsoft is to Software. The only difference, maybe, is that Walmart has really low prices, but then you all were opposed to Microsoft's dominance for reasons other than cost...right?!?

    2. Re:Netflix bent over to collect Sales Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walmart charges sales tax too. You get a 30 day free trial though, like NetFlix, and it seems to me that Walmart has newer DVDs for rent than Netflix.

  26. Bad for business by Evro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To say the least, that's not going to be good for business

    Um, yeah, maybe not for Netflix. But I thought competition was good?

    --
    rooooar
  27. Blatant copy? by svenjob · · Score: 1

    When I went to Wal-Marts DVD rental site, it had the look-and-feel of NetFlix. It doesn't have all of the fancy way to rate the movies, but it def. has the feel of NetFlix. I wonder how they are able to copy the site so blatantly without recourse.

    --

    Totally Life!

    ALL replies

  28. Johnson's Big and Fat Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    over on fourth.

    Also, Arby's.

  29. Morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think at least one thing wal-mart has going against it is the worry that they could try to inject their social mores into which DVDs they carry.

    If they do not do this, that's fine, but if you're going to limit your selection so you don't carry 'immoral' stuff it's going to hurt you. Not carrying stuff you disagree with isn't a problem if you're the big superstore people go to for convenience, but once they reach the online arena, well, if you're going to bother renting movies online then most likely you're going to be the kind of person who actually thinks "Kite" is kind of neat. There's a reason that people buy music from amazon.com before they'll buy it from Walmart.com, and yes, Marilyn Manson probably has something to do with it.

    Then again, maybe Wal-mart's gotten a bit more flexible about that as of late.. i found our local wal-mart carrying "the boondock saints" last week. Given, we're in a college town, but that's still pretty surprising.

    I heard Blockbuster for awhile censored their tapes. Is this true, and have they stopped doing it with the move to DVD?

    1. Re:Morality by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      Perverts are a minority. The idea that catering to a higher standard of decency will cause business failure is a myth the pr0n freaks like to trot out. If the market "forces" self-censorship, then that's what the market wants. Anyone who wants sleaze or scum can go to an adult store. They'll have no problem competing with Wal-Mart, because they're in a different market. I dream of a world where those intelligent enough to live above their animal instincts can be unbothered by those preferring to wallow in the mire of filth.

      Another myth is that Wal-mart is only for fat dimwits. Wal-mart is a good place to buy lots of things cheap, especially where there were no local small-time shops to begin with.

    2. Re:Morality by superyooser · · Score: 1
      I'm more concerned about how Hollywood injects its social mores into the movies themselves that are on the DVDs

      ... on the movie screens, TV screens, airplane screens, t-shirts, toys, kids' lunchboxes, billboards, newspapers, magazines, the web, and radio waves (ads) -- all of which essentially saturates our entire culture with Hollywood's mores when only a very small percentage of Americans pay to see any particular movie.

    3. Re:Morality by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Interesting words from a guy with a website named "slimetech"

      So pornography is only for perverts? And perverts are in the minority? That is also very interesting based on all the porn sales, VHS tapes and DVD's as well as adult streaming media and x-rated cable channels coupled with all kinds of softcore Maxim, FHM, Playboy, to hardcore magazines Hustler, Penthouse...etc.

      You've got some strong feelings on those who like anything other than lily white chaste movies. Are you perhaps suffering from some sort of sexual inhibitions caused by an overly zelous religious upbringing?

      Would you like to talk about it?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  30. Is Walmart turning into a monopoly? by chendo · · Score: 1

    If Walmart proceedes to start swallowing bits of everything, and succeeds in them all, we'll have something like Microsoft again :/

    Personally, I have never seen a Walmart in my entire life. They only have K'mart down here in Australia :p

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
    1. Re:Is Walmart turning into a monopoly? by CmdrObvious · · Score: 0

      They actually do have Walmart in Australia, They just call it "BIG W" I was in Canbera on a business trip, and went in the store and there was a greeter with a blue vest, etc, etc, etc... I was half expecting to see an OS called "the BIG M" Still, prob no service on DVD rentals though. CMDR Obvious

    2. Re:Is Walmart turning into a monopoly? by chendo · · Score: 1

      Ah.. so that's what Big W is :p Never made the relation between Big W and Walmart.

      --
      Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
  31. You want to make some SERIOUS money? by WndrBr3d · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rent DVD porn. I'm serious, the porn market on the internet already makes insane amounts of money. All you need to do is start up a NetFlix service that rents out DVD porn.

    Both NetFlix and the new Wal-Mart service will not carry such titles.

    And if anyone out there knows of a service like this already, please, let me know :-D

    1. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by seafoodbuffet · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A quick search on google for netflix porn Seems like there's quite a few already in this space including:
      • privateathome.com
      • X4rent.com
      • xxx-dvdrental.com
      • rentflixxx.com
      • sugardvd.com
      disclaimer: I've not tried any of these services so please don't ask me if they're any good
    2. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There already are some out there. just do a google search.

    3. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by funbobby · · Score: 1

      BlueDVD.com I think its called. If that doesn't find it just google blueDVD. It's cheap and fast and has a good selection. I'm not sure if they do the monthly fee thing for serious addicts, but the price is reasonable for renting just one.

      BTW that's the only reason that independent video stores still exist; Blockbuster won't rent pr0n.
      Walmart will of course have the same problem.

    4. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      I saw banners ads for this place:

      Sugar DVD

      And a search on Google for "adult DVD rental" turns up a bunch of other ones, too. HTH, HAND.

    6. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      There are several.... Try DVDOvernight. They have a resonable selection of newer and fetish titles. I've always had good luck with them. Or do a search on Yahoo's Directory, several are listed.

    7. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by dacetone · · Score: 1

      Mercury DVD, a local Seattle company rents adult DVDs via mail (and delivery in the area).

      --
      Just follow the day, and reach fo
    8. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by wcbrown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's got to be a reason why this hasn't happened:

      a) the people who would use that service probably already subscribe to sites on the Net.

      b) when the urge strikes you, you probably want immediate gratification.

      c) you can almost guarantee an immediate turnover of the rentals (they get it in and probably send it out next day).

      d) the cleaning of returned rentals is probably costly. (j/k...maybe)

    9. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Dielectric · · Score: 2, Funny

      OK, the funniest thing is that 5 people (probably more by now) have replied with helpful comments. God bless the internet, and god bless pornography!

    10. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen Brother!

    11. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative
      I haven't tried a one of them, but here are some possibilities:

      Private At Home

      Wantedlist.com

      X4Rent

      SugarDVD.com

      Video Takeout

      DVD Climax

      Bedroom DVDs

      And then there is RentFlixxx.com, but they are down at the moment.


      Anyway, I was bored, and know about google, so I figured I would give you a hand...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Rent DVD porn. I'm serious, the porn market on the internet already makes insane amounts of money.

      Ugh. I can't think of anything more disgusting than handling something that is guaranteed to have been in the possession of someone clutching their own genitals.

    13. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What like money !!!!!

    14. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Greencine has some adult titles. I don't think they have anything hardcore but they do have some skin and sex titles. Skinamax and Anime type stuff.

      If you want harder porn then invest in me. I was going to offer those titles when I was working towards my own such service. I lost my job again before I really had enough movies. I still know where I can buy them wholesale though. Damn. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    15. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by JohnDonagher · · Score: 1


      There already is one, at least, from a quick search on google

    16. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      be sure to wear gloves before handling those DVDs! Maybe the DVD service can sanitize the DVD and packaging before sending it back out..

    17. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "so I figured I would give you a hand.."

      Think about what just you said.

    18. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I can't think of anything more disgusting than handling something that is guaranteed to have been in the possession of someone clutching their own genitals."

      How about eating something that is guaranteed to have been in the possession of someone clutching someone else's genitals?

      Come on now, we've all been served by a slutty chick at a diner before. :)

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    19. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      comments like this are why you remain on my Friend list...

    20. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      Blockbuster doesn't rent porn, but in .ca, Rogers video does... And it's about as common as Blockbuster (in fact I haven't been to a town that doesn't have one of each). But yet, for some reason, there are still MnP stores here...

      So I don't think the porn connection is very strong, if it's there at all (personally I rent from a mom and pop store down the street because of my own morals. It's about as expensive as Blockbuster, but the service is way better. )

    21. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh. I can't think of anything more disgusting than handling something that is guaranteed to have been in the possession of someone clutching their own genitals.

      Uh, ever shake hands with someone?

    22. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by RedX · · Score: 1
      Ugh. I can't think of anything more disgusting than handling something that is guaranteed to have been in the possession of someone clutching their own genitals.

      I take it you're typing this from inside a public restroom, too afraid to touch the door-handle to leave?

    23. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by calethix · · Score: 1

      no doubt... he wants porn with someone else's personal juice stains all over it. I suppose it's DVD though, wouldn't be quite as bad as magazines.

    24. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by calethix · · Score: 1

      no doubt... he wants porn with someone else's personal juice stains all over it. I suppose it's DVD though, wouldn't be quite as bad as magazines.

      er, I meant to say who instead of he :)

    25. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Come on now, we've all been served by a slutty chick at a diner before"

      or dated a slutty chick because she likes giving blow jobs... then realized you're not the first

    26. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ugh. I can't think of anything more disgusting than handling something that is guaranteed to have been in the possession of someone clutching their own genitals.

      Ummm. You must have a pretty limited imagination.

      How about touching the hands of someone guaranteed to have been in intimate contact with their own genitals?

      You shake hands with geeks don't you? Maybe not anymore.

    27. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by gtshafted · · Score: 1

      here's another

    28. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by cejones · · Score: 1

      I also would like Netflix to start renting video games.. First start with something that could make them big bucks... Xbox, PS2, Gamecube... then branch out into PC games...

      Even better... rent older console system games... PS1, Dreamcast, maybe not as big a demand... but there are still many many people with these consoles...

    29. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Netflix doesn't carry porm per-se, but they have many NC-17/Unrated titles that come close.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    30. Re:You want to make some SERIOUS money? by hellfire · · Score: 1

      Ugh. I can't think of anything more disgusting than handling something that is guaranteed to have been in the possession of someone clutching their own genitals.

      You don't seem to understand. In the porn market this is actually a selling point!

      --

      "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  32. Wal-mart conservative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would mean Netflix would have to offer 'off color' DVDs. They currently do not. This is how the 'other' rental places (besides Hollywood and Blockbuster) manage to stay in business though.

    Rented pr0n by mail. And the Netflix recommendations!

    You gave "Asian Amateur Beach Party!" 4 stars...
    we think you'll give
    "Li Does LA III" 3.2 stars....

  33. Jesu Christo.... by Elvisisdead · · Score: 1

    Once my mom finds out about this, I'm going to have to tell her what a DVD player is and how to use one of those, too.

    --

    "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
  34. As Seinfeld put it by Exiler · · Score: 1

    That's not going to be good for anybody

    --
    Banaaaana!
  35. Let's me see here... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wlamart has food, clothing, gasoline, and domestic services all in one handy area..

    I guess as soon as they offer housing and, then the dream of corporate feudalism will be complete. ;)

    1. Re:Let's me see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but can I get a tank of gas, cheeseburger, and a blow job all at the same time there?

    2. Re:Let's me see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not. It worked for Krupps way back when.

    3. Re:Let's me see here... by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 1

      I guess as soon as they offer housing and, then the dream of corporate feudalism will be complete. ;)

      You think you're kidding, but you're not.

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
    4. Re:Let's me see here... by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      Then they'll start paying in Walmart scrip, I imagine.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    5. Re:Let's me see here... by Shaper+of+Myths · · Score: 1

      OK, it's official. We need a moderation for +1, Frightening...

  36. Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by rbullo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's a well known fact that when Wal Mart moves into a town, many small businesses are forced to hang 'em up, because they cannot compete with Wal Mart's prices. Thus, the relevence of this story. Wal Mart may force NetFlix out of buisiness. And given Wal Mart's poor track record for service, I don't think this will be "good for the consumer". If, however, NetFlix has enough money to compete, we

    will be better off for it.

    --
    OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
    1. Re:Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by Lizard_King · · Score: 1

      I understand and I've seen the Walmart effect first-hand where I live. The interesting thing is that free market economics doesn't take into account well intangibles such as quality of service levels, employee knowledge, etc. Cheaper prices means economic consumer benefits.

      I'm not advocating a Walmart take-over of the world; simply stating that Walmarts are a neccessary evil of capitalism.

      I hope NetFlix has enough money to compete and I hope other organizations see opportunity and enter the market space.

      --
      "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    2. Re:Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by Zuke8675309 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It will be good for the consumer because there will be price competition. As it stands now, Netflix has cut down on service and raised prices since they started. In fact, this is EXACTLY the type of service that Wal-Mart should EXCEL at. Wal-Mart is a master of the supply chain, which is the main issue with DVD rental through the mail.

      I don't understand the argument against Wal-Mart in regards to small businesses. If Wal-Mart undercut everyone else, pushed small businesses out of business, and then jacked their prices up I could understand the argument. I haven't seen that though, they're always the lowest price. Lowest price is good for consumers. As for the service aspect - I don't need good service to buy rubbermaid, toilet paper, toys, video games, or dvds. I just need/want low price.

    3. Re:Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by hazem · · Score: 1

      interesting thing is that free market economics doesn't take into account well intangibles such as quality of service levels, employee knowledge

      Well, IAMAE,BIHTSEC (I am not an economist, but I've taken several economics classes)... It seems to me that free market economics are good at taking into account what people value - as long as they are willing to back up those values with their dollar.

      Most people say they value high quality and good service, but at the end of the day, they are standing in the checkout line at Walmart. So it seems that if anything, free market economics are good at ferreting out the truth about what people will do, rather than what they say.

      Of course, this sucks for those of us who value good service and high quality.

      I would say, though, that we can't really blame Walmart - we have to blame the people that flock to the store as soon as it opens. Walmart wouldn't go there if the people wouldn't come.

    4. Re:Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by lpret · · Score: 1

      poor track record for service? I have no idea what Walmart you shop at, but at the 20 bazillion that I've been to, they have great service in terms taking returns, being friendly, and making sure everything is in stock. What bad service have you seen?

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    5. Re:Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by Elbows · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The general argument against walmart is this:
      They pay their employees shit (as well as busting unions and various other unscrupulous practices), so all of the money that Walmart makes is concentrated in the hands of the owners of the company, who are already filthy rich, as opposed to back into the local community. The result is uneven distribution of wealth, and a weaker local economy (b/c all the money is going elsewhere).

      Small businesses, on the other hand, in general pay their employees better, and the owners themselves are local, so basically all of their profit is going back into the local economy. Additionally, since the employees are paid better and the owners are probably not obscenely rich, wealth is distributed more evenly on the whole.

      The problem is that, from an individual perspective, it may make sense to shop at wallmart . (Some ppl prefer small stores where they can actually find what they're looking for, but most don't seem to care). But, shopping at walmart damages the community, which in turn hurts the individual -- but in an indirect way, so that the individual doesn't connect the resulting problems back to walmart, and therefore has no reason to stop shopping there.

    6. Re:Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by El · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they are also driving down the price of unskilled labor, and expect employees to work unpaid overtime. How do you think they keep their prices down?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    7. Re:Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Yes, but they are also driving down the price of unskilled labor

      There's a reason why unskilled labor is cheap. Are you suggesting that someone who stocks shelves and mops floors deserves the same pay as someone who busted his ass to gain the skills to not have to take that kind of job?

      and expect employees to work unpaid overtime.

      There are laws against that. I'm sure that Labor would be interested in hearing about instances such as that (they busted Best Buy a couple of years ago for overtime violations).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up !!! .... I can confirm that the parent's point is well understood at the upper-management levels of Walmart. As one such manager remarked, the trick is to "watch what people DO, not what they SAY", and followed with an anecdotal story about following a car with an anti-Walmart bumper sticker on it directly into the local Walmart parking lot. Much laughter ensued ...

    9. Re:Wal Mart vs. Microsoft by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that. I heard this morning on the news that there are over 30 suits against them from all over the contry for just that. Unpaid over time.

  37. Long time now... by evilviper · · Score: 1

    This is not news. Walmart's service has been going since before I signed up myself. While /. was linking to walmart's first $200 PC, anyone browsing the DVD section would see a "Rent" link, which would tell you about this service.

    In fact, I concacted Netflix, and the response was quite fair...

    Netflix has several distribution facilities, while Walmart has one, which means most of the US will have a nice long wait to get their titles. Netflix has a much larger library as well. Why would you use Walmart's service? Save just over a buck, only so you can have a service many times more crappy...

    Saying Walmart is going to kill Netflix is like saying Slashdot is going to kill CNN...

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Long time now... by Little+Brother · · Score: 1
      Slashdot is going to kill CNN...

      You cannot kill that which is already dead. I consider CNN dead from the point it switched over to the "new" format and became as crappy as any other TV news.

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

    2. Re:Long time now... by NeB_Zero · · Score: 1

      Did you not read the above, six distribution facilities for Walmart.

      Plus, most of the U.S. will have 2 day service.

      Sorry, just read the article.

    3. Re:Long time now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you not read the above, six distribution facilities for Walmart.

      Silly rabbit! Actually READING the article is for true geeks.. not the hoi-polloi who read the /. to get in on the geeky interweb thing!

      (An uninformed reader is your best source of post spam!)

      maeryk

    4. Re:Long time now... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Ahem, that was the reply I got approximately 4 months ago from the Netflix representative...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  38. Re:Blatant copy? Details Please by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

    At this point you say it has the same "look-and-feel" of NetFlix. Having never been to a NetFlix, please, give more detail as to what is the same. For with the amount of information in your post I can't tell if you mean it has what looks like a NetFlix logo, but with WalMart in it, or if it just gives off the same psychic 'vibes' or if titles are simply organized into the same catagory. Please, when you say somebody is copying somebody else, give at least some examples of what is copied, otherwise your post, while perhaps true and noteworthy, doesn't have enough information in it to back it up and so won't give any information to people who don't already agree with you. (Those who disagree can say "no it isn't" and have contributed just as much as you, and those with no opinion have no information to judge their opinion on.)

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

  39. First there was one... by Dynastar454 · · Score: 1

    ...and now there are many. Something like this was inevitable given the growth of the on-line DVD rental industry. You had the trailblazer, then a few specialists started showing up, and now the big boys jump into the fray. It's how almost all new markets progress.

    --


    Laugh at stupidity: mod idiots +1 Funny.
    1. Re:First there was one... by bsd+troll · · Score: 1
  40. More here by andy1307 · · Score: 1
    They are just expanding this service.

    "We know from industry figures and our own sales figures that about a third of all households in the U.S. have DVD players. And that number is growing," Severson said

    This could work for WalMart. As DVD players get cheaper, the number of households owning DVD players will go up. Walmart can sell the cheap DVD players AND rent out the DVDs.

  41. Corporations don't need it by NeB_Zero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why rent a DVD, then have to wait for it???? Go to your locally owned, operated, mom and pop video store and check out an indie flick, or a new release even. Support your local stores and help your local economy. Wal-mart employs one of my parents, but my town's local economy is shrinking, and this town could one day dry and blow away. I think this is a common thing all over the U.S.

    In short, SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL BUSINESSES.

    Thank you

    1. Re:Corporations don't need it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indie Flick as in flicks that are show on IFC? Every flick they show tries to glorify pedophilia or some other demented behavior.

    2. Re:Corporations don't need it by Jack+Comics · · Score: 1

      No such beast here. Every DVD rental store within 15 miles of my house is either a Blockbuster or Hollywood Video. There used to be a couple about fifteen to twenty years ago, but they've both long since closed up shop, since they weren't able to complete with Blockbuster.

      --
      "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    3. Re:Corporations don't need it by NeB_Zero · · Score: 1

      as in independent, maybe 'B' grade films

      obscurity sometimes yeilds better results than high budget films

    4. Re:Corporations don't need it by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Netflix has a distribution center about 10 miles up the main road around here, so they at least provide local employment. Everything else is Hollywood Video, Blockbuster and one mom/pop store with high prices and a crappy selection of indie movies.

    5. Re:Corporations don't need it by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Actually, in my area, there's a video rental business that's so good, they've driven out even Blockbuster. They have, quite literally any title you could ever want from hard core porn to Disney, and their prices are better than Blockbuster/Aol/Time/Warner/Disney/Whateverelsethi sweek Megacorp. Fuck Wal-Mart. Fuck Blockbuster.

    6. Re:Corporations don't need it by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 1

      Out here in East Podunkistan we don't have a "boutique" video store. Hell, we don't even have a full size Blockbuster. Thank goodness for GreenCine.

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
  42. Walmart customer are 'net savvy???? by zoobaby · · Score: 1

    /Troll

    Walmarts were typically found in smaller towns where they can crush competitors easily. Then they started moving into medium size towns and crushed the competition again (Kmart, Montgomery Wards, etc...). /end Troll

    Having stated this, I do not think that Walmarts typical, in store, customers would rent dvds online. Walmart may be able to steal all of Netflicks clientel. I, however find this doubtful.

    Most 'net renters are "early adoptors" and renting dvds online is still in its infancy. I do not think that Walmart can attract these customers since these customers realize how evil Walmart is and would most likely die if their friends found out they use Walmart services.

    1. Re:Walmart customer are 'net savvy???? by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      "renting dvds online is still in its infancy"

      That's for sure. If netflix or walmart would ship to Canada, I'd be sold. As much as I hate walmart (I refuse to shop there, ever. I'm quite happy paying an extra $5 for a pair of pants or whatever from another store, preferably small and Canadian, or just one of the two) If walmart offered service to Canada, I'd sign up in a heartbeat.

      I mean, jesus. I can ship a DVD sized package to the states for about $1.50 CDN. So there'd be longer turnaround, I can deal w/ that (or they could let Canadians take out 4 in a shot to make up for it)

  43. Who's going to be working there? by Polyphemis · · Score: 1

    Unless I hear some damned glowing reviews of how good the service is in my area, I know that there is NO way I'll touch this with a 20-foot pole. I worked at Wal-Mart for eight months and based on the human detritus and mediocrities they hire, and how pathetically little they train and oversee them, I wouldn't trust ANYONE on their end to EVER get anything I ordered right. And if there any problems, what then? Customer service? A fucking joke.

    I hope this fails miserably, or at least makes Netflix a more popular choice. I don't care if I'd be paying more, I KNOW that the chances of me getting any kind of quality service from Wal-Mart is slim at best. What kind of selection do you think they'll have anyway? They won't sell anything uncensored.

    1. Re:Who's going to be working there? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I worked at Wal-Mart for eight months and based on the human detritus and mediocrities they hire

      Careful how you word things, you might imply something about yourself you don't mean to!

  44. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    To say the least, that's not going to be good for business

    As a Wal-mart stockholder with no stock in NetFlix, I think this will be very good for business.

  45. This has been around ... by jasonsfa98 · · Score: 1

    I've already had an account with them an canceled. It works just fine, but I don't like subscription services.

  46. At under $50 per crappy Made In China player... by sulli · · Score: 1

    they could give the customer a player as part of a one-year 20-rental deal. DVD hasn't been fancy-ass modern tech for years now.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  47. This works great if you are house-bound... by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 1

    My mother is not able to get around anymore, and netflix has been an excellent service for her. She is the kind of account that Netflix (or Wal-Mart) don't want, as she gets movies constantly. Of course they would rather you sit on a couple, three movies all month.

    If you are stuck at home, this is great news. And the fact that wal-Mart can do it in a couple days is even better.

  48. Nothing rated R at WalMart, please... by tinrobot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I doubt WalMart will carry anything with either nudity or controversy. I mean they just pulled Cosmo off their shelves because it was too tittilating. Being so 'family oriented' eliminates a *huge* proportion of the films out there.

    I think NetFlix can survive simply on the fact that they can carry a wider selection of films...

    1. Re:Nothing rated R at WalMart, please... by JDevers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wal-Mart pulled Cosmo because people were complaining about it, especially since they generally stocked it right at the checkout stands where everyone had to see it. There is an important distinction here, they stocked the product until enough people complained about it. At which point they probably did a cost/benefit analysis of their Cosmo sales and realized that they weren't selling enough to justify a group of people getting pissed at them.

      They still stock virtually all recent movies and a decent selection of older things (like I said in another post, I recently purchased Scarface from them, unedited). I would imagine an online store would be even less likely to screen their movies as they would in-store.

    2. Re:Nothing rated R at WalMart, please... by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1
      I mean they just pulled Cosmo off their shelves because it was too tittilating.

      They didn't pull it, they simply moved it or covered the cover. So what? Who wants to read (or their kids to read) big blazing titles like "WHAT HE REALLY WANTS IN BED!!!" when checking out. Big deal.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
  49. Um how? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    "To say the least, that's not going to be good for business"

    How exactly? Walmart has to compete, therefore service is better and/or price is lower. Benefit: Consumer. Netflix has a large competitor, therefore service gets better and/or price is lowered. Benefit: Consumer. Somebody'll probably win. So what? The competition is where the good stuff happens.

    "If Walmart/Microsoft/Intel/*AA joins the party, then it'll automatically become a bad thing."

  50. Wal-Mart can't censor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wal-Mart can't censor, but it certainly has the freedom to choose what it sells. If you don't like it, open your own store and sell what you want.

    1. Re:Wal-Mart can't censor by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Seems to me we have played this game before but here we go:

      censor - to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable

      Used in a sentence:

      Walmart uses their huge market strength to force the creation of censored versions of cd's. This censorship is often against the will of the artist but is a necessity if the label doesn't want to lose its largest distributor.

  51. Heh, oops by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

    Just now realized NetFlix, and the WalMart thing are Online only, I could have gone to each site in the amount of time it took to write the post. Still, details would have been nice. But my apologies for not first reading the story.

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

  52. walmart has the tools, however by kraksmoka · · Score: 1

    can't NetFlix use the publicity that walmart brings and the mainstream acceptance-ness to grow their business even larger. its the kind of news that will help them promote themselves. if they redouble their current efforts now, they know the business, they should be able to stay ahead for some time to come.

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  53. Poem from Lord of the Rings applies ... by peter303 · · Score: 1, Funny

    One STORE to rule them all,
    One STORE to find them,
    One STORE to take them all,
    And in the Darkness bind them.

    In Arkansas* where shadows lie.

    (*HQ of WalMart)

  54. All this whining about censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of the comments so far have been about Wal-Mart censoring what they sell and how the posters don't like it. All I have to say is, if you don't like wal-mart's policies DON'T SHOP THERE! It is as simple as that. Continue using netflix's service if you hate wal-mart. Like it or not wal-mart can choose what they will or won't sell. Just like the local Christian bookstore can choose not to carry the satanic bible. You never see the satanists whining about that, they have their own bookstores! Jeez people, start thinking!

  55. Not like the last big employer in Pennsylvania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That last big employer - Aldephia sure was more ethical than Wal*Mart

  56. Re:Blatant copy? Details Please by svenjob · · Score: 1

    It has the same color stars, same layout of the picture of the DVD with it's rating and title. It has very similar graphics, sidebar, wait descriptions, and pop-up answers. The overall feel is that of NetFlix. I prefer NetFlix because it doesn't have the huge, annoying Wal-Mart top-menu. Also, Wal-Mart doesn't offer the "movie-geek" (that's what I call it) subscription plan of 8 DVDs out at a time for $40 a month.

    --

    Totally Life!

    ALL replies

  57. But Wal-Mart won't... by D3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    carry such exotic fare as the non-rated version of "Embrace of the Vampire". So what good is the service? Seriously, Wal-Mart will heavily sensor the movies they carry. I say screw-em.

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
    1. Re:But Wal-Mart won't... by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      carry such exotic fare as the non-rated version of "Embrace of the Vampire". So what good is the service? Seriously, Wal-Mart will heavily sensor the movies they carry. I say screw-em.

      Do you have ANY proof of Wal-mart censoring movies? I keep hearing this.. but I keep seeing "the good stuff" at their checkout counters.. the Kevin Smith stuff, Pulp Fiction,
      other "controversial" titles.. (sure.. they arent likely to have Angel Heart.. but then neither does my brick-n-mortar rental place down the street.)

      People who want non-rated embrace of the vampire are probably _not_ the target audience for this service. The target audience is people like me who buy the oddball stuff when they find it, but refuse to spend 30 bucks to go see a movie with my wife, and will wait a couple more days to get it from Netflix rather than pay twice Netflix amount to rent it from BallBuster. (who has several times sold me bad "previewed" movies, and given me lip about returning them.. ).

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    2. Re:But Wal-Mart won't... by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Walmart the store does not carry the unrated versions of R rated movies that sometimes come out on dvd. Netflix does. So that would lead you to believe that the walmart rental won't carry them either.

    3. Re:But Wal-Mart won't... by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      Walmart the store does not carry the unrated versions of R rated movies that sometimes come out on dvd. Netflix does. So that would lead you to believe that the walmart rental won't carry them either.

      Right.. I realize that.. but people are making it sound like they are carrying "cleaned up" versions. (After all.. there is a reason the studio releases an R, an R directors cut, and then an "unrated".. which is pretty bogus anyway.. cause technically all "Unrated" means is it was never run past the MPAA censors. I could sell five hours of a camera pointed at my floor as "Unrated!" for that very reason.)

      But nobody is chopping parts out of the movies for sale at Walmart.. they are just choosing what to carry.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    4. Re:But Wal-Mart won't... by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Yes you are exactly right. But I think the point was would you rather shop at a place that lets YOU choose which one to buy or a place that only gives you 1 option when there are several actually available?

      Its all about selection. Netflix has a better selection, and unless Walmart changes its ways Netflix will always have a better selection.

  58. Maybe bad for Netflix, good for us by Daniel+Quinlan · · Score: 0
    With a seriously tremendous infrastructure and expansive will, Wal-Mart stands poised to overtake Netflix. To say the least, that's not going to be good for business.

    Did I miss something? Why should anyone care if Netflix goes out of business? If Wal-Mart can beat 'em, more power to them. It's a business run over the web and by postal mail. Anyone can compete in this space and we, the consumer, have nothing to lose (except maybe if all the players disappear). This is good for us, maybe we'll get a price war, especially if a few more companies decide to jump into the business.

    I don't want to hear any whining about Wal-Mart and small town stores. Whatever you believe, it just doesn't apply here since this business has no store front.

  59. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will be even better when Wal-Mart begins shipping out edited videos with no explicit labeling. Maybe I can get the special "Rated" edition of American Pie, which is actually about pie. And Swordfish, mmm, nice shot of... uh, fish.

    Come to think of it, I'll just go watch the Food Network, which comes with my basic cable. No need for me to play chicken with Sam Walton's ethics.

  60. Exemplary business practices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wal-Mart has exemplary business practices. However, they have earned the hate of union thugs because they refuse to force their employees to join unions.

    Last year, there was a sort of Boycott Wal-Mart Day declared. It was a dismal failure.

    1. Re:Exemplary business practices by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      Wanna read? Look here, here, and here..

      I know they're from the same web site but Google will find you more examples.

    2. Re:Exemplary business practices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, hippy.

      Only dirty hippies read "independent media" articles. As a proud American, I distrust all of these left-wing maniac poorly-Xeroxed propaganda rags.

  61. Walmart chasing old technology? by Raindance · · Score: 1

    As a business decision, it probably makes sense for Walmart to get into this. It's a simple (well, pseudo-simple) profit equation.

    As a comment on technology, though, Walmart's efforts in building this arm of business seems like investing heavily in railroads at the turn of the century. Or keeping with and investing in physical music distribution despite the growing capabilities of online/digital distribution. More power to them, I suppose, though I hope they don't screw things up for others, as has seemingly happened with old-school business models in the music industry.

  62. I'm Guessing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's only so much market for Disney and other "family entertainment" of the sort Wal-Mart usually provides. I doubt there'll be a lot of cross-competition.

  63. Great selection is why we get it by Hollinger · · Score: 1

    They have a great selection, including, among other things, "speciality" items, such as documentaries and concerts. For example, if I'm interested in "The Rights of Autumn," the College Football Documentary, I doubt Blockbuster would have that in stock. With netflix, I can grab discs 1 through 3 (with my account -- you get more with more expensive accounts). Watch those as I have time, and send them back in time to get the rest of the discs.

    1. Re:Great selection is why we get it by travisbecker · · Score: 1

      I agree, the selection at Netflix is great. Part of the reason I signed up with them is because they had "Rififi", an old French gangster movie (no jokes please) that the guys on The Digital Bits (www.thedigitalbits.com) raved about. Now I don't know for sure that Blockbuster and Hollywood don't carry it, but why go searching thru the aisles when I can just click on it?

      Travis

  64. Don't get the whole point of those damn things.. by chendo · · Score: 1

    Why does Walmart want to go into the rental business anyway? To make more money? Probably, but the problem is as with any monoply, if we rely on them, and if they go down, we'll have to find somewhere else to rent our vids. And by the time that happens, competitors would have already been squashed, so we have no places to rent our pr0n out for a while :(

    I think all companies should just stick to one main service and specialise in them. That way, if one business goes down, everything else doesn't go down either.

    Kinda like Linux :p

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
  65. Thank you Adolf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you ready to fire the ovens and finish the job?

  66. Limited Market by dkragen2002 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To be honest, I think Netflix has already saturated the market for this. As has been identified by others, the true geeks, rent and rip the DVD, or find the torrent, or KaZaa or iMesh it.

    The market to watch is when someone (like a Wal-Mart) puts thier money into the technology to develop a streaming technology or a download and play type of busniess model. Of course what that model is, I can't say (or I'd be rich!)

    I think the weak link in the chain is the hardware. If I could watch movies without having to actually get a DVD or pry my kids away from the DVD player to watch a movie, it would be more appealing.

    Also, there is nothing (in movie rental land) worse than getting your NetFlix rental disc after waiting 2 months and seeing that it appears to have been run over in a gravel pit. (Just return it, we'll put you back on the list).

    Lastly, our stupid television media (techno-morons) had this story last night and said Wal-Mart was going to now compete directly with Blockbuster for the video rental market. No mention of NetFlix whatsoever. Shows an interesting perspective on what the true perception of the "masses" are about what technology exists.

    Dave

    1. Re:Limited Market by CaptRespect · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think maybe netflix has missed the people that don't really use thier computer much. I know a lot of people that have never heard of netflix and are amazed when I tell them about it.
      These people also shop at Walmart. If walmart starts to advertise in it's stores for it or on television it should grab plenty of customers.

      Plus Walmart has the ablity to do this at it's stores since they are almost everywhere. If a person doesn't have a computer at home walmart could potentally have them sign up at the store and order either through the store or a catalog or something.

    2. Re:Limited Market by dkragen2002 · · Score: 1

      You have a valid point. The Wal-Mart PR giant certainly does have an edge. And yes, I'm sure there will a lot of people who "try it out".

      But seriously, I don't think signing up and ordering AT Wal-Mart would ever fly.

      I'd love to see a spin that says "Instead of driving to Blockbuster to get your movie NOW, drive here, order it, and you'll get in a week!"

      I think the base busniess assumption has to be that customers of this service have computers and are fairly comfortable with them. There will be spike a in "newbies", but just for the experience.

      Dave

    3. Re:Limited Market by athakur999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True geeks, IMO, would be MORE likely to rent the DVD rather than download it. It's the casual movie watcher that's happy with a badly compressed version off of Kazaa. Geeks want to enjoy their movies in their full 5.1 surround sound/THX/whatever glory on their big screen.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    4. Re:Limited Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just download the full DVD, duh!

  67. Don't Give Either Of 'Em Your Money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Forget NetFlix and Walmart!!! Support your local videostores, or indie startups like

    Greencine that give you other choices besides MPAA-approved Hollywood pablum!

    1. Re:Don't Give Either Of 'Em Your Money! by nosferatu-man · · Score: 1

      Damn tootin'. My girlfriend owns a video store and I don't make enough dough to support us both.

      'jfb

      --
      To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
  68. netflix has been going downhill by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    Netflix used to try really hard to please customers, now they've gotten so big that they no longer seem to care.

    1. Monday: put DVD in mail
    2. Tuesday: in postal transit
    3. Wednesday: arrives in at NetFlix in Pennsyltucky. Netflix staffers place it on a shelf, go out for lattes.
    4. Thursday: Inspected and marked as returned in Netflix database, send email to me acknowledging receipt, more lattes
    5. Friday: Things starting to pile up, no lates today. Next DVD on my queue picked and mailed out
    6. Monday, often Tuesday: next DVD arrives.

    Back when NetFlix's only distribution house was in California turn around to the east coast was not that much different, sometimes better. They've taken 4 days advantage by adding more distribution houses and pissed it away with internal bottlenecks.

    Their database quality has also suffered recently. You used to be able to get full information about what each DVD offered. Some movies I'd like to see again if they've got director commentary. This info used to be easier to come by, now it's hit or miss. Both WalMart and Netflix insist on breaking up special feature DVDs from the main disc which drives me nuts.

    If WallyMart can get them off their rear ends, I'm all for it.

    1. Re:netflix has been going downhill by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      It must be you. I can drop a dvd in the mail monday morning and get the next one by thursday.

    2. Re:netflix has been going downhill by travisbecker · · Score: 1

      I've been a customer of Netflix since last December, and have had positive experiences with them. Here's my typical timeline:

      1. Monday: Put DVD in mail.
      2. Tuesday: DVD arrives at Netflix. Next DVD picked out and mailed.
      3. Wednesday: Next DVD arrives in mail for me.

      Now, I live in the Bay Area, so I'm sure that's helping the turnaround times. I've also been renting 3-5 movies per month, so they're probably just on the edge of making money off me. Other posts outline the advantages Walmart has over Netflix, or vice versa, so I won't regurgitate here. But I'll stick with them as long as service is good (and no, I don't work for Netflix).

      Travis

    3. Re:netflix has been going downhill by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      My service has gotten signifcantly faster for me lately. This is probably due to the fact that Netflix opened up a distribution center recently in Coppell, TX (which is a whooping 20 miles or so away from me) than any process enhancements on their part.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    4. Re:netflix has been going downhill by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      my service has improved as well since they added a distribution center in nearby CT, bypassing the Queens center (same one there were thefts from). I now have 3 day complete turnaround.

  69. It a real shame by KingKire64 · · Score: 1

    that walmart has to enter the fray. Who needs compition. If walmart does a good job netflix will either (a) provide better business (b) become cheaper (c) go out of business.
    Didnt i see an article that older customers at netflix get screwed on new releases?

    --
    "All I can tell the "lesser of two evils" folks is that if they keep voting for evil, they'll keep getting evil."-Lp.org
  70. One feature that seems better than Netflix by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

    It looks like they don't treat 2 disc sets as seperate rentals. For example the Disney Miyazaki releases are on two discs, on Netflix they treat the Bonus disc as a 2nd rental. Perhaps Walmart do too but their website seems to suggest otherwise.

    Also something I noticed that's totally unscientific, but perhaps gives some indication as to the stock levels of Walmart compared to Netflix: Spirited Away on Netflix is shipping now, whereas for Walmart it's classed as "Very Long Wait". Can't read into that as it's the only movie I looked at though!

  71. Hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the short term this could be good for perverted NetFlix customers like me, it might spur NetFlix into offering more racy DVDs, right now they only have some cable-safe stuff, and even that is being closed down. Not tapping into the adult market is a big mistake for NetFlix IMHO. And obviously that's somewhere WalMart won't follow them, since they appeal to lowest-common-denomonator morality.

    In the long term, of course, NetFlix will be crushed like a bug, and since Wal-Flix will be the largest DVD rental market, all DVDs will have to be edited so as not to offend doughy white Oklahoman housewife boodmares.

    Oh well, NetFlix was fun while it lasted...

  72. The market is self-correcting by JonTurner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not good for the consumer? Rubbish. You act as though aggressive competition guarantees an irrevocable market dominance. It doesn't! As soon as your theoretical future-walmart doesn't meet the consumer's desire for quality+low prices+convenience (something it currently does quite well, mind you) another business can rise up to meet that need.

    Give the consumer due credit -- when a company takes it's customer base for granted and acts like a "dinosaur" it loses market share to smaller, more nimble companies that give the customer what they want. The business history books are full of examples (see Sears & Roebuck, K-Mark, IBM, etc.)

    Result? Problem solved, unless you simply don't believe that capitalism works.

    1. Re:The market is self-correcting by sbeitzel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh. The biggest enemy of capitalism is successful capitalists. I forget whom I'm quoting, here, so I'll welcome any citations.

      The point, though, is that an economic juggernaut like Wal-Mart has the ability to erect such significant barriers to entry once it achieves market dominance that no future competition can exist. Capitalism and the free market are nice models, but they are ultimately unbalanced. As soon as some entity has accumulated a huge portion of any given market, then that market is no longer free.

      Your point about taking the market for granted is well-made, but it is a separate issue. There you're not talking about capitalism or free market economics, you're talking about business practices and inertia -- dangers which lurk for companies of all sizes.

      --
      Oh, go on, check out my job.
    2. Re:The market is self-correcting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Not good for the consumer? Rubbish. You act as though aggressive competition guarantees an irrevocable market dominance. It doesn't! As soon as your theoretical future-walmart doesn't meet the consumer's desire for quality+low prices+convenience (something it currently does quite well, mind you) another business can rise up to meet that need.
      And Wal-Mart can (and will) then leverage their near-monopoly to lower their prices to an unprofitable level, putting this other business out of, well, business. Lather, rinse, repeat.

      IOW, there will never be any real competition. It will always be sporadic and doomed to fail. Other businesses will come and go, but Wal-Mart perseveres. Yay, capitalism.

    3. Re:The market is self-correcting by dekashizl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lo, an intelligent sub-thread!

      The issue here is that mega-corporations like WalMart (and companies like them) have the ability to subsidize long periods of losses in one division (by even giving product away for FREE) to achieve market dominance and force out little players.

      Once in a monopoly position, their power is even more significant, because they can further erect barriers to entry beyond simply impossibly low price expectations. For example, they begin invoking patents, pushing for new legislation, establishing single-vendor agreements with suppliers/distributors, and more.

      We've seen ALL of this done before. The examples the Slashdot community is most familiar with are no doubt Microsoft, but they didn't invent Monopoly business practices, they just play it very well.

      Your idealist view of the free market sounds like it came from a 7th grade economy textbook. It sounds great on paper, but it just doesn't work that way. I don't mean this as a flame, but it is dangerous when intelligent people (as you appear to be) maintain overly-simplified views of matters of this importance. For example, your last sentence regarding Capitalism. Capitalism doesn't "work" or "not work". It's just a pretty good man-concocted system for keeping economics in rough order, and it has its flaws like any other system.

    4. Re:The market is self-correcting by wondafucka · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Walmart encourages the self censorship of media. An example would be that Walmart refuesed to carry Magic the Gathering cards until they took out several cards / altered the artwork which did happen. The same could be true for movies as well.

      Netflix will probably always survive because you can rent movies that are controversial, but I don't like it when a company has such an impressive control over the content of their products.

      That aside, Walmart has every right to not sell "questionable" or "offensive" material and consumers have every right to support this by shopping at Wallmart.

    5. Re:The market is self-correcting by EricTheGreen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do believe that capitalism works, but you underestimate the ol' "barrier to entry" issue here. Just because an opportunity exists doesn't mean an enterprise is ready/able to service it.

      When you start considering Walmart's ability to throw it's collective weight around in the supply chain, said barriers to entry become even more formidable. You want to service a niche in the DVD rental market. Hard to do it if the various distributors will only supply you if you buy thousands of copies of a broad part of their catalog, only 5% of which may make sense to your business model...

      Again, I'm all for capitalism--but don't sugar-coat the difficulty of carving a niche out, even one ignored by the big players.

    6. Re:The market is self-correcting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I do believe that capitalism works

      I don't know what you mean by "works." Without that, it's impossible to assess your assertion.

      Here's what I think you mean: according to the first theorem of welfare economics, an equilibrium produced by competitive markets will exhaust all possible gains from exchange. That is, a competitive equilibrium is Pareto-efficient. That is, no one can improve their situation without making another person worse off. The second theorem of welfare economics states that any allocation on the contract curve can be sustained as a competitive equilbrium. That is, any possible efficient allocation of goods lying on the contract curve can be reached given an appropriate initial endowment of goods.

      These two theorems are often taken to vindicate capitalism as they suggest an unregulated market will arrive at a sustainable Pareto efficient equilibrium.

      However, the main problem that most people overlook (or ignore, or don't know) is that the proofs of these two theorems make several assumptions which are false. For example, the nonexistence of externalities, both positive and negative.

      A positive externality is something like a lighthouse: you build it, it provides a public good that you cannot prevent others from using and benefiting from. A negative externality is pollution: you vent smoke from your factory and other people are forced to bear the burden, whether they like it or not.

      Positive and negative externalities exist. Allowing for these, one cannot get the rosy results implied from the previous two theorems. Hence, if we *want* a sustainable equilibrium that is Pareto-efficient, we cannot have a purely free market. Hence pure capitalism cannot fulfill its function. Some regulation is necessary - the question is, how much.

      Factor in the reflexive nature of economic systems (i.e., existant law and theories of economics can influence purchasing and competitive strategies of companies) and you've got a very difficult system to control.

      So the question of what "works" and how it "works" is very difficult to answer, if the answer is to be properly understood and not ideologically driven.

      Now, I wonder if anyone will bother to read this.

    7. Re:The market is self-correcting by paitre · · Score: 1

      Even with that, tell me which WalMart's -ever- carried MtG cards.
      Because I remember that brouhaha -very- well, and the WalMarts in my area -never- carried the things.
      Which was irrititating ;)

    8. Re:The market is self-correcting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, I wonder if anyone will bother to read this.

      It made me miss my high school economics teacher. Thanks for reminding me that I want to minor in economics when I return to school.

    9. Re:The market is self-correcting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me relate a tale of what Wal-Mart has done to the local economy of the city in which I reside. We were hit with two Wal-Marts, one in the city and one in the suburb. I live in the suburb and with the juggernut coming in, well there was some excitement in the air. No one even considered the rammifications of this bastion of evil. Naturally, traffic became nearly unbearable due to a super center being here. As to be expected, stores started closing and jobs were being lost. Two supermarkets, a drug store, a K-Mart, and a few mom and pop specialty stores. These were all stores that did very good business and had hundereds of employees combined. There is hardly anywhere to shop without driving 20 miles to the other side of the city and many still haven't found new jobs. This is a total destruction of competition and at least 700 people losing their jobs. Some of these stores had been around for 20 years and now they are all gone. I haven't shopped at a Wal-Mart for two years and still going strong and never will if I can ever help it. I hope everyone that reads this will do the same.

    10. Re:The market is self-correcting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a simple (but often put forward) economic fallacy.

      IF someone is that successful, they could raise prices.

      but then if they raised prices, they better the risk/reward ratio for the compatition, and they will soon have competition.

      IF they don't raise prices, in order to keep out competition, then they have done nothing to undermine capitalism-- they are just the most efficient, and the consumer wins.

      (And the competition goes and does something more lucurative.)

      There is nothing evil to walmart-- except in the eyes of communists who hate to see poor people able to buy what they need and have a decent standard of living.

    11. Re:The market is self-correcting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I wonder if anyone will be fooled by such a load of bullshit.

      You really should take an economics class- it would at least let you pretend to be an economist with more authenticity.

    12. Re:The market is self-correcting by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      The Wal-Mart's in the following Texas cities carry MtG - Kilgore, and Longview. I do not know if any of the other Wal-Mart's in the East Texas area carry MtG.

    13. Re:The market is self-correcting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then if they raised prices, they better the risk/reward ratio for the compatition, and they will soon have competition.

      Then all they have to do is re-lower their prices, which they can easily do to their monopoly profits (think Microsofts 40 billion in cash) to drive out the new competition. Duh!

    14. Re:The market is self-correcting by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      No idea. I was too busy supporting the local comic shops to take notice.

    15. Re:The market is self-correcting by StarFace · · Score: 1
      IF they don't raise prices, in order to keep out competition, then they have done nothing to undermine capitalism-- they are just the most efficient, and the consumer wins.

      Except that "the consumer" is not an isolated entity. Your proposed model is far too simplistic. You are forgeting the benefits of local economy. In this particular example, Wal*Mart has utterly decimated the local economy where ever they go, and replaced it with a single source that offers bland goods, poor wages for the community, and even worse employee treatment. This effects everything in the area. It is not just some fictional group of people who have no interconnections with the world around them.

      And the competition goes and does something more lucurative.

      Actually, Wal*Mart's "competition" is usually local commerce. "Mom and Pop" stores, if you will. When an establishment that is barely in business already gets run out of business, there is typically not enough capital to just go do something more lucrative. Meanwhile, all of the diversity in local trade drops to near nothing as the only place to shop for general goods becomes a company that decides what stock you will see from thousands of miles away. This has happened countless times all over the nation. So much so, Wal*Mart has become known for it, and you will often find people demanding they not be allowed to move in, at town councils. The fact that you seem ignorant of this is surprising. I am just relating common knowledge here.

      There is nothing evil to walmart-- except in the eyes of communists who hate to see poor people able to buy what they need and have a decent standard of living.

      Do you even know what a communist is? Your assertion makes no sense. And decent standard of living? Do you know many people who make their living working at Wal*Mart? You seriously need to read up on this company, they are a classic example of how capitalism fails in the long term, even if a monopoly state is never reached.

      --
      V
    16. Re:The market is self-correcting by paitre · · Score: 1

      I paid attention only because I worked down the street from one for a while.
      I, also, spent most of my money at the local comic and gaming shops.
      Sadly, my favorite has closed since I moved out of town :\

  73. Even bigger than that by EisPick · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to this article in Slate, Wal-Mart, with $244 billion in revenues last year, represents nearly 2.5 percent of the U.S. economy. Worldwide, they employ 1.38 million.

  74. Ad bar on the right of the excite article? by Hollinger · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice the "sponsored links" bar to the right of the article? They're all for online rental services.

  75. I've read. Yes, exemplary business practices. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been to Alternet. They are not any sort of news site, or any place for facts. It is nothing but fringe editorials.

    In the first link, Wal-Mart has angered a kook sexist pressure group. In the next link, you find nothing but an editorial by a failed talk-radio host with a strong record of opposing people's rights. I read this one in a newspaper long ago. The third article came from a neo-Soviet journal.

    It is about as credible as providing links to a Rush Limbaugh rant, or articles about Wal-Mart angering "Operation Rescue" (just to give examples of the same sorts of nuts you use as support, but from the other side). Next time, look beyond the kooks for real news.

  76. why Netflix? by uncadonna · · Score: 1
    • 1) Late fees
    • 2) Selection
    • 3) Recommendations
    • 4) Reviews

    In general, I support local businesses over corporations, but that presumes they are delivering similar products. In this case, the corporate service is so much better that I have moved on. It's a shame. My town has GREAT video stores, but they still don't hold a candle to Netflix.

    Similarly, I no longer see the point of independent booksellers. Megastores and Amazon deliver so much better product that even if they aren't nicer people they get most of my business.

    In the long run, something else has to emerge to hold together the local community besides retail. For the most part, local retail has become a buggy whip.

    --
    mt
  77. so I figured I would give you a hand... by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
    I hope it was the browsing, rather than the non-browsing hand...

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  78. WALMART hs Much Obscure stuff, anime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am amazed at how much obscure stuff the Walmart DVD rental service has. They have Anime stuff I cant rent anywhere else. Really, if you like anime you should check it out.
    Now I feel guilty, I actually dont care that Walmart uses slave labor in third world countires because I want these cartoons so bad!

  79. A little late guys by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 1

    I was getting these DVDs from Walmart about 6 months ago. This is not new news.

    --

    Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
    1. Re:A little late guys by John3 · · Score: 1

      They were just testing the service, not doing full-blown promotions in all their stores.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
  80. The answer to Wal-Mart is to COMPETE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those smaller companies love to hand business to Wal-Mart by failing to compete. Consider the "mom and pop" store that closes at 5:00. Along comes the Wal-Mart staying open past 10:00, attracting the customers the other store could not be bothered to stay open and serve.

    1. Re:The answer to Wal-Mart is to COMPETE by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      Those smaller companies love to hand business to Wal-Mart by failing to compete. Consider the "mom and pop" store that closes at 5:00. Along comes the Wal-Mart staying open past 10:00, attracting the customers the other store could not be bothered to stay open and serve

      No doubt! Add to that high prices, and just not having a "local commitment" even though they make their money there.

      I like Loews if I need a buttload of stuff.. wood, paint, etc. But right up the street from me is a little hardware store called Heimbach Bros. And it is in fact two brothers.. age indeterminate.. but at least 60's, who own, and run the place. Apparently alone. If you walk in that door, someone is there to help you before the door closes. If you are just looking, say "just looking" and they dissapear. If you need something they dont have in stock, he will have it to you in a day or two (even hard to find stuff.) Thats where the bulk of my hardware money goes.. because I like the service. I like the fact that they bend over backwards just as hard to sell me a 12 cent bolt as they do a 300 dollar stove. THat is something Wal-mart cant compete with, at least for me. But Radio Shack is the other way around.. the greasy overly-perfumed salesmen, the blaring stereo displays, and people trying to shove techno-babble (in some cases complete bullshit babble) down my throat to get a sale on something that isnt a good deal at half the price.. they dont get my money. Unless they have something I simply cannot find anywhere else.

      So there you have it.. I dont love walmart.. but they sure beat Rad shack for me.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  81. Potential buisness partner. by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 1

    If you start that up, I'll start up a DVD cleaning and sterilization service and place it next door to yours. You'll need it.

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
  82. God Forbid by MBCook · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    God forbid that someone takes a stand against some of the crap that gets marketed today. They are a private company and it's their RIGHT to be able to do that. If you don't agree, don't buy from them. But I bet there are many people who buy at Walmart specifically to get clean versions, or because they know they won't buy a movie there that looks interesting to find that it's almost pornographic.

    There is nothing wrong with holding a standard of decency. Are you going to yell at them for not selling porn too? Get off your crooked high horse and realize that some people LIKE it this way. I see nothing wrong with what they're doing. I wish MORE companies would stand up against the trash that gets marketed today.

    I'm somewhat suprised that the parrent wasn't moderated as a troll, at least once. You see a "... has a long and unbroken track record of removing/banning/censoring things too non-consertative ... for their ... brain dead store-goers.". That is blatently inflamitory in language. I would say that what they're doing is "... has a long and strong track record of making sure what they sell stands up to their corporate standards of decency.".

    And how do you know they won't rent the "unbasterdized" (to go along with your language) versions for those who want them? How do you know that you won't have to specifically ASK for the edited versions?

    Hooray for Walmart. I see them as a great company, and I think that this move will be beneficial for consumers in the end. I'm sorry if I can't seem them for the evil conlogmerate that many of you /.ers seem to.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:God Forbid by MrLint · · Score: 1

      All I can ask is to get a copy of this corporate decency standards handbook. I'd bet it would be an intresting read.

    2. Re:God Forbid by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Anytime a company uses their status as the largest company in the country and number 1 music distributor to force another company to create two versions of a cd or otherwise not sell any version is a pretty bad thing.

      Imagine if Microsoft told a game company that it wouldn't allow its games to work in Windows unless they censored it. Now that games company could tell Microsoft to go f themselves but that would mean losing a huge amount of sales. Instead they would suck up the extra cost of producing two versions.

    3. Re:God Forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have obviously never worked for this great company. I worked in the electonics department for a year and a half, and know Wal-Mart's policies reguarding music. In most cases as it relates to music, the only way to tell if an album is edited for content, is to look for the word edited in small print under the bar code, or sometimes, it is just an E.

      Yes, it is their right to sell the products that they choose, but when they are the only store within 40 to 50 miles that sells music, movies, or books, then you are screwed.

    4. Re:God Forbid by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      There is nothing wrong with holding a standard of decency. Are you going to yell at them for not selling porn too? Get off your crooked high horse and realize that some people LIKE it this way. I see nothing wrong with what they're doing. I wish MORE companies would stand up against the trash that gets marketed today.

      Yeah, well i don't, and in some cases, Wakmart has made the original product _unavailable_ to me. They used marketing pressure to make Wizards of the Coast to change the art and text on several of their cards so they would be "appropriate" for Walmarts customers. Unfortunatly this was a globabl change, so the old art, which was far superior was no longer available to me.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    5. Re:God Forbid by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      I bet there are many people who buy at Walmart specifically to get clean versions,

      How do you know that you won't have to specifically ASK for the edited versions?

      I know at least one person who bought a CD there, only to find out they bleeped out all the bad words, especially the word "drug". It wasn't marked as edited in any way. He wasn't amused.

      I wish MORE companies would stand up against the trash that gets marketed today.

      If the consumers don't want it, they won't buy it. I don't want a bunch of millionares controlling what I watch based on their petty personal hangups.

      There is nothing wrong with holding a standard of decency.

      There's a big difference from you holding a standard of decency, and the only store selling movies and CD's in Alva, Oklahoma holding a standard of decency. One is a personal choice, the other one pushes that choice on everyone in a community. They have the right to do that, but that doesn't mean we have to approve or like it.

    6. Re:God Forbid by cnkeller · · Score: 1
      Yeah, well i don't, and in some cases, Wakmart has made the original product _unavailable_ to me. They used marketing pressure to make Wizards of the Coast to change the art and text on several of their cards so they would be "appropriate" for Walmarts customers. Unfortunatly this was a globabl change, so the old art, which was far superior was no longer available to me.

      While I understand your sentiment, the problem is WoC, not Walmart. After the art change, did you send a hard copy letter to WoC explaining your position and that due to their change in marketing, you are now forced to purchase a competing game? Probably not (good for you if you did).

      Vote with your dollars. That's all anyone understands.

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    7. Re:God Forbid by swillden · · Score: 1

      But I bet there are many people who buy at Walmart specifically to get clean versions

      In support of your theory, I am just such a person.

      I like rock music, the harder the better, and for some reason most of the bands in this genre feel a need to pepper their songs with profanity, use lewd, suggestive and/or disturbing cover art, etc. I'm also a father of small children who pay attention to *everything* and I don't want to have that crap around them. For that matter, I prefer not to have that crap around me.

      Thanks to Wal-Mart, I can buy the tunes I like, and (mostly) don't have to worry about my kids overhearing them. I say mostly because Wal-Mart's standards don't line up exactly with mine -- I'd prefer a little bit more got edited out -- but I can exclude a song or two from my playlist easily enough.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:God Forbid by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

      They don't have standards of decency. They are bluenoses and prudes, but not decent. There is something mentally ill about pushing violence porn from Ah-nold while banning sexual stuff.

      One example of their product selection: pulling t-shirts that were offensive because they asserted that one day a woman will be president.

      I bet you can get chadors cheap at Walmart. And wife-beaters.

      IHBT

    9. Re:God Forbid by DavittJPotter · · Score: 1

      ..."There is nothing wrong with holding a standard of decency"...

      You're absolutely right. However, what is wrong is holding -everyone- to that same standard of decency. It's a slippery slope, and we've seen it's impact in many disparate areas - TV, movies, books, magazines, video games, etc. A 'governing body' becomes more and more responsible for 'thinking of the children' and parents become less and less involved with actually teaching their children right and wrong, and letting their kids form their own opinions on life, morality, and decency.

      What do you consider "decent"? Is it the same standard that Islam holds for women? "Indecent Exposure" in some middle-eastern countries is far different than Daytona Beach, Florida. The majority of a group of people or society should decide on decency and morality, and not a small subset of people.

      If you don't like the values/morals that you're living amongst, you have a choice. Change the channel. Return the book. Don't buy any more video games from that supplier. Teach your children that just because Mr. Potter enjoys porn, you'd rather they didn't watch it. I don't particularly think that 9-yr old kids should watch "The Terminator", edited for content or not. But that's my opinion.

      I guess my point is it's this opinion exactly that stifles creativity, engenders fear of being "different", and ultimately limits us and our children. Guide, don't dictate. Next you won't be able to purchase something *you* like, because it won't adhere to somebody else's standards.

      --
      "If there's hope, it lies in the proles..."
    10. Re:God Forbid by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      So swears and scantily clad women really bother you that much? Furthermore you see nothing wrong with being bothered by such things?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  83. Since when... by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

    ...is Wal-Mart obligated to carry certain products?

    There are many, many other evils--REAL evils, without hyperbole, that we could speak of when referring to Wal-Mart, but what is wrong with them refusing to carry something or display it in the open? If they were actively using their market force to force something upon someone, that's one thing, but if a company takes it upon themselves to censor something so that they can sell it in Wal-Mart under current policies, that's not Wal-Mart's evil.

    We don't complain that Texaco is wrong for not carrying prescription drugs; They just don't cater to that market. I don't see the problem with Wal-Mart refusing to carry items that they find offensive: They just don't cater to that market.

  84. Tried Walmart - NetFlix is much better... by TheRealStyro · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I tried Walmart dvd rentals a few months back the selection seemed about the same as NetFlix, but the quantity wasn't there. Just about every title I wanted to rent was a 'long wait', whereas on NetFlix very few titles have any wait whatsoever.

    Walmart needs to get a greater quantity of titles before they steal significant market from NetFlix. I would also like to see Walmart enable returns/check-ins at stores (stores could bulk-main discs back to distribution sites).

    --
  85. Netflix can gain the edge IF by rudeboy1 · · Score: 1

    And I've been saying this for a while now. They need to start renting console games. Why not? It's not like they would have to change much around to do it. They would ship in the same packaging, and the fact that most games would require an extended rental time, means they would ship fewer movies per customer, while still getting the same monthly fees.

    --
    Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
  86. Long record? You mean NO record. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " track record of removing/banning/censoring things too non-consertative/too non-christian/too non-'patrotic'/too 'contreversial'"

    Hmmm. You can be proven wrong so easily. How about on the nothing "non-conservative" part?

    Go to www.walmart.com and search on Michael Moore. You will find several items. You will also find several books by Ralph Nader. They have 3 CD's by Noam Chomsky.

    Christianity only? Wrong there too. I found many books items about Buddhism, Islam, and other faiths.

    Non-"patriotic"? See the Chomsky and Moore items listed above.

    1. Re:Long record? You mean NO record. by MrLint · · Score: 1

      The fact that they sell those items you list in no way revokes the fact that walmart has infact done removing, banning, and censoring. That in no way proves me wrong. You would have to instead prove walmart has *never* done those things.

  87. Why sweat late fees? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, Netflix lets you rent a movie and then keep it as long as you like. So a great movie you can watch a few times. Or, perhaps if you're really busy you can just keep a movie a few weeks until you're ready to watch it. And I don't have to go anywhere or remember to take a movie back - I go home and there's a movie in the mail, which I can just leave at the mailbox at work when I'm done.

    Also of course, the chances are that the movies I want to watch are not even going to be at a local store. Netflix has a pretty good selection so I can find some stuff that I probably would not otherwise run across.

    Perhaps if I lived anywhere near a really good rental place things would be different. But I don't, so I'm glad Netflix is around. And for my mom (who I also bought a subscription for) it's nice not to have to drive an hour to the nearest city just to rent a movie.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  88. Re:The way we used to do it... by justMichael · · Score: 1

    there were always 3-4 movies laying around the house in addition to our own collection. When your scenario came up, we had 3-4 movies plus our collection to choose from.

    Finish one and send it off.

    Of course this was back when you could turn around a movie with NetFlix in about 4 days.

  89. ack! by curtlewis · · Score: 1

    I hope it doesn't hurt Netflix. I'm a customer and I like Netflix and I despise Walmart.

    Like someone else said in this thread, Walmart's entry into this only validates online rentals.

    While some people are driven by spontaneity and instant gratification, which makes them poor candidates for customers, other people can enjoy relatively low rental costs and no bother shopping for your rental. Postage is even pre-paid. It's such an easy service to use and the selection is HUGE. I can rent stuff no video rental store would have on DVD.

  90. Ariel Sharon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ariel Sharon is replaced with someone who doesn't see military action as the first solution to every problem."

    They already have somelike that. Mr. Sharon has been forced into military action because the other options have failed.

    Look at the peace plan, recently. Sharon gave it a chance, but Hamas re-declared their war of extermination.

  91. Will they rent p0rn DVDs? by cdporter00 · · Score: 1

    What about R-Rated movies? This is from a store that recently removed Cosmo and Redbook from their store shelves.

  92. Competition! by boatboy · · Score: 1

    To say the least, that's not going to be good for business.
    It'll be great for business, and for consumers. Introducing competition into the market will force both NetFlix and Walmart to have lower prices and better services than if either one of them had 100% market share. Funny, you don't hear anyone whine when another OS company enters the market...

  93. It will be low brow NetFlix by dangerweasel · · Score: 1

    Wal-Mart is one of the places that LIKES to carry the fullscreen version of a film, and thinks it is their responsiblity to censor for you. These things may make Wal-Marts offerings a lot less appealing to a lot of people, like my self. I will keep my NetFlix, thank you.

  94. seinfield reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...that's not going to be good for business... that's not going to be good for anybody."

  95. I do have kids by ScottGant · · Score: 1

    He's 9, so not young in the sense we have to change a diaper. But when we rent movies, he's a good kid and he usually wants to rent a game and knows what game he wants etc etc.

    As for movies, we buy the movies he want's to see...not all the time mind you, but the big ones that he wants to watch. And he will...over and over and over and over again. Usually Spongebob videos.

    But now I see what nitch Netflix provides! Never thought of some of the ways people use it.

    But like I said, that was only my situation. But I've got more food for thought now and I may give them a try now!

    Thanks!

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    1. Re:I do have kids by Eccles · · Score: 1

      But when we rent movies, he's a good kid and he usually wants to rent a game and knows what game he wants etc etc.

      Is there any Netflix equivalent for games?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:I do have kids by swillden · · Score: 1

      No, you have "kid", not "kids". It's pretty easy to be spontaneous with a single child who's old enough to know how to behave (which is different from behaving, but still...).

      The difference between one kid and two kids is enormous, almost as large as the difference between none and one. The difference between two and three is also surprisingly large. It's mostly, I think, due to the fact that you only have two arms and can't hold three hands very effectively.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:I do have kids by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of Fred Brooks' description of human interaction and how the larger a group gets the less efficient it gets. The same holds true with a family I guess.
      My wife and I had been going back and forth about having another. Now I think we'll stick with just the one.
      Thanks!

    4. Re:I do have kids by swillden · · Score: 1

      My wife and I had been going back and forth about having another. Now I think we'll stick with just the one.

      Ooh, I'd hate to think that I had a part in *that* decision.

      However, allow me to point out that not only are more kids more difficult/more work, they're also much more fun and, IMO, grow up to be better adults, on average. They're more fun because the interactions between children are endlessly amusing (and endlessly frustrating/annoying, but it all comes as a package). I think they grow up to be better adults because they learn a lot in the process of dealing with a sibling. The older ones get a chance to learn some more responsibility, as well.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  96. Thanks Walmart.. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Isn't it great news to see giant retailers that have already expanded to kill most local markets now expanding to try to do the same to online markets. I was fine with Walmart until they went to SuperWalmarts and HyperWalmarts. They killed off smaller local retailers, local grocery stores, local gas stations, local banks.. and now they have to attack the media rental business? As a consumer how do I benefit from having a single business control everything?

    Not to say I never buy from Walmart but I make an effort to buy equally from other retailers also. Even if they can't compete with Walmart on a price basis I've found many Mom & Pop places have a lot better service and can offer you things that aren't offered by the likes of Walmart.

    In this regard I suggest Greencine for online rentals. They have a good selection and if you want something they don't have they will get it for you. They respond quickly and friendly to all questions and suggestions. Overall I like them a lot.

    I do buy cheap movies from Walmarts. They now offer VHS movies for $4 and DVD's for $6. Not a bad price at all. I'd rather buy at that price than bother renting. Walmart still has some issues with very limited offerings though.. finding anime there really is impossible. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  97. Walmart sucks compared with Netflix by akuma(x86) · · Score: 1

    I tried Walmart's 1 month free DVD rental service and it sucks compared with Netflix. The titles are no where near as available as they are on Netflix. Trying to rent just about any decent movie resulted in a "short wait". The same movies were readily available on Netflix.

    1. Re:Walmart sucks compared with Netflix by John3 · · Score: 1

      Wal*Mart sucks compared to most other sources of product. Their music and video departments carries fewer titles than Virgin or Tower, but Wal*Mart is the #1 distributor of music and video in America. Once they start to bleed customers from NetFlix it won't matter how good the selection is. The only hope NetFlix has is that they can downsize accordingly, although from what I've read they haven't yet shown a profit. They have to move quickly or they're dead.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    2. Re:Walmart sucks compared with Netflix by travisbecker · · Score: 1

      what I've read they haven't yet shown a profit

      According to a recent article on The Motley Fool:

      The company is now looking to earn between $0.13 and $0.17 a share in the June quarter on revenue of at least $62 million. While it has made a comforting habit of underpromising and overdelivering with every passing guidance marker, this will be its first profitable quarter.

      So it isn't profitable yet, but coming close.

      Travis

      P.S. This is my 3rd post to this article, but I really don't work for Netflix, I just like the service.

    3. Re:Walmart sucks compared with Netflix by John3 · · Score: 1
      So it isn't profitable yet, but coming close.


      It may wind up being the only profitable quarter in their history. :-)


      Seriously, if they become profitable and can make adjustments to their business model then they can survive Wal*Mart. NetFlix doesn't have to worry about closing down stores or unloading real estate when Wal*Mart moves in. Virtual storefronts have low rental costs. By the same token, once Wal*Mart gets up a head of steam then they will be able to add a broader range of DVD's to match the NetFlix selection. It costs very little to add new titles to the database.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
  98. The Net effects of Wal-Mart... by cnelzie · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...is that the money that used to spend its time in various community related transactions at least 7 times before leaving a community now leaves that community within 2 to 3 transactions.

    In most small towns that a Wal-Mart is dropped on, the vibrant downtown area dries up and becomes a shell of its former self with only a few niche shops and perhaps one or two restaurants that typically go out of business as well, since nobody has money to buy from them anymore.

    There are some EXTREMELY rare cases where that is not the case, but that is typically due to other mitigating factors that simply aren't available in most small towns. Things like Colleges and Art Academies or tourist attractions.

    If you drove to 200 or so small towns that Wal-Mart moved into, check the City Records one to two years before Wal-Mart moved in to see how many businesses were registered and paying taxes and then look at the same records one, two, three and five years later. Most ALL of the time you see the number of businesses drop away.

    This erodes the tax base since many of those business owners will either lose everything and become a VERY underpaid Wal-Mart employee or will pack up and skip town.

    All in all the net effect is that many community leaders, that may have sponsored local events, as many small town shopkeepers and business associations do, will disappear. This causes an abrupt ending to many local events and eventually destroys the heart and the soul of those small towns.

    Wal-Mart is a community destroying corporate monster that knows no bounds, sells cheap merchandise from overseas manufacturers, denigrates its employees and does what it can to destroy ALL competition. (Like it is attempting to do with Meijer's here in Michigan. I know that because I had overheard a Wal-Mart location scout chatting away on his cell phone regarding a new Meijer's store.)

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:The Net effects of Wal-Mart... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I don't like Wal-mart, and I haven't shopped tehre in over a year but claiming that the downtowns all went away because of wal-mart is just hype.

      In my area, all of the downtowns disappeared when the Mall got built and mini-malls started popping up. This was when Wal-mart was still just a 5 and Dime.

    2. Re:The Net effects of Wal-Mart... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

      There is a fundamental difference between a Wal-Mart and malls or mini-malls. With a Mall shopping center many of the stores can be ran by local interests, whether they be a franchise or a mom and pop store that exists only in that one Mall or shopping center.

      Also, while the jobs aren't exactly the highest paying, there are more store manager positions available in a Mall or Mini-Mall. Those Malls and Mini-Malls provide a significant lower-middle-class to a community. Wal-Mart doesn't provide that to a small town community.

      --
      If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    3. Re:The Net effects of Wal-Mart... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      That may or may not be true. What I was saying is that my downtown was GONE way before Wal-Mart came to be.

      Have you been in a mall lately? The Gap, Sears, JCPenney's are all national interests.

    4. Re:The Net effects of Wal-Mart... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

      I have been to a mall recently. I also saw more stores then one store and far more store managers then one would find in a Wal-Mart.

      I also saw greater variety then one would find within a Wal-Mart with a myriad of positions that result in all levels of income potential.

      Another thing that I saw was a number of franchise as well as Mom and Pop stores dispersed throughout the place.

      Does Wal-Mart provide that?

      I am not discounting that your small town's downtown area had fallen away prior to Wal-Mart's appearance. There are many factors to the destruction of Small Town Downtown areas.

      However, there are far to many cases of vibrant and VERY active small town downtown areas drying up after a Wal-Mart moves into the area to ignore as a fluke.

      --
      If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  99. FilmCaddy.com has best price by Deciduous_Tree · · Score: 1

    I use FilmCaddy.com - they allow 4 movies out at once and charge $19.95/month.

    Their selection is a little worse than NetFlix, but I can still find hundreds of titles that I want to rent.

  100. At least those pop-ups will be gone by John3 · · Score: 1
    Wal*Mart is rapidly running out of potential retail locations, so they are trying to find new revenue sources outside their huge stores.

    Honestly, I don't feel too badly about them killing Netflix as I'm getting tired of the Netflix pop-up banner ads. We're not talking about a 100 year old family establishment...Netflix is just another corporation. If people don't care when Wal*Mart destroys their downtown communities I doubt that they'll care when a two year old mail order firm bites the dust.

    --
    "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
  101. Re:Selection problems -- Dvd's Edited by RobTheJedi · · Score: 1

    I recently joined netflix after finding out that the version of The Piano Teacher we had rented from Hollywood video had been edited. I don't think that any place that rents video's should only make available to it's customers the versions of films that have been edited like this. I think Walmart will fall into this catagor just like Hollywood Video / Blockbuster.

    --
    I am so creative, look at my cry for attention in my sig.
  102. Refuting arguments against Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "They pay their employees shit"

    No, they pay their employees what the work is actually worth.

    "as well as busting unions and various other unscrupulous practices"

    There is nothing unscrupulous about protecting workers by not forcing them to join unions (this is hardly "union busting").

    "The result is uneven distribution of wealth, and a weaker local economy (b/c all the money is going elsewhere)."

    No, it is not. The money is also going to the employees, and also to local charitable efforts and contributions.

    "Small businesses, on the other hand, in general pay their employees better, and the owners themselves are local, so basically all of their profit is going back into the local economy."

    This is a wild and unfounded assumption, destroyed as soon as the local pharmacy owner spends his profits on a cottage "up north" or orders a $1200 TV set from "Sharper Image".

    "But, shopping at walmart damages the community, which in turn hurts the individual "

    No, it does not in any way.

    "and therefore has no reason to stop shopping there."

    Yes, there is no reason to stop shopping there.

    1. Re:Refuting arguments against Wal-Mart by redheaded_stepchild · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the above AC apparently works for Wally.

      Having grown up in small towns, I'll tell you right now: when WalMart comes to town, the mom&pops die a quick death. I can't see how this is _helping_ the community.
      As for the money the employees recieve/spend locally, if their pittance of a wage is anywhere near the grandiose allowances exec's usually receive/spend in far flung places, then it wouldn't harm the community.
      I mean, why shop where people know you, help you, and generally are part of the 'community' instead of where you get a better price on a lower quality product, from people who don't know you from a turd on the street and treat you the same way?

      --
      Don't use the Troll mod just because you disagree with me.
    2. Re:Refuting arguments against Wal-Mart by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      They pay their employees shit

      No, they pay their employees what the work is actually worth.

      You could also mention that their employees are willing to work for the pay that Wal-Mart offers them. If they don't like what they're getting, they can no doubt get better-paying jobs elsewhere. Working at Wal-Mart (or at any other retailer, I'd imagine...speaking from my own experience at Best Buy, anyway) is like working at McDonald's...it'll put some coin in your wallet and it's a job you can land without much experience (a good thing if you're in high school or college), but it's not something most people will want to do forever.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:Refuting arguments against Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the mom&pops die a quick death

      Usually they have it coming. Who wants to shop for, say, hardware in a 20x20 store when they can have an actual choice of brands and products?

    4. Re:Refuting arguments against Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sig really offends me.

      Or, I mean, um, something about Wal-Mart . . .

    5. Re:Refuting arguments against Wal-Mart by cdh · · Score: 1

      Many of those mom and pop shops should have been out of business long ago. Go to some of those, do they have a lot of "well" paid employees? Most likely not. They probably have a bunch of family members or a bunch of part timers earning not much more, if any, than anybody at WalMart.

    6. Re:Refuting arguments against Wal-Mart by zdislaw · · Score: 1

      Only an AC poster would suggest that you should buy hardware at a Walmart. I mean, seriously now...get real!

      --
      bad sig...no donut.
  103. Hidden Charges from WalMart by Mr.Gibs · · Score: 5, Informative
    Well, they aren't exactly hidden, but the Walmart site states that you have to pay almost $18 for any CD that is lost by either you or the post office.

    I currently subscribe to Netflix, and at the rate they are either lost or stolen while in route back to the Netflix warehouse, I wouldn't want to be paying that for each one! Netflix has yet to charge me for those and state they won't unless it becomes frequent.

    Anyway, I'll be sticking to Netflix...

    --
    I live to gib...
  104. wakka-ding-hoy!!!!!!! by circusboy · · Score: 1

    the plex lives!

    long live "american flagg"

    howard chaykin you visionary!

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  105. Glad to see competition by Saganaga · · Score: 1

    I've been a happy Netflix customer for the past few months, but I nevertheless still think Walmart's announcement is a Good Thing. Competition has a way of focusing one's attention. In this case, I think Netflix will be forced to continue to innovate and differentiate their service from Walmart's.

    For instance, Netflix's movie recommendation system could be vastly improved. To me, this feature, along with the catalog searching feature, is one of the best things about Netflix--no more standing around at Blockbuster trying to find something to watch.

    It's also very likely that Netflix will have to lower their prices to match Walmart's. If not, they'll have to justify higher prices by providing better service, more selection, etc.

  106. MOD UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck, that was Insightful, and I just used my last mod point up above.

    (ashamed to admit that I shopped at Walmart this morning)

  107. Re:LOUD SUCKING SOUND COMING FROM BUFFALO, NY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up! Walmart and Hillary Clinton are synonymous. Hillary Clinton is taking away American jobs and setting up foreign tech sweatshops and Walmart is taking away American jobs and setting up foreign ordinary sweatshops.

  108. Thanks for the idea! by John3 · · Score: 1

    Too bad I saw it before the gang at Netflix!

    Sam Walton

    --
    "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
  109. Virgin and Tower suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Wal*Mart sucks compared to most other sources of product. Their music and video departments carries fewer titles than Virgin or Tower,"

    Virgin and Tower "suck" compared to Wal-Mart because they are not really big national chains: they have a few stores scattered around the country.

    Sure, the selection is much better at these few stores, but it "sucks' to have to drive 300+ miles to find a Virgin or Tower compared to a Wal-Mart which might be 8 miles away.

    1. Re:Virgin and Tower suck by John3 · · Score: 1

      I'm just pointing out that even though Wal*Mart has a lousy selection in their video department they are still the number one retailer of DVD's in the country. The fact that NetFlix has a bigger selection than Wal*Mart means nothing to most consumers...it's all about convenience and price.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    2. Re:Virgin and Tower suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of us live in some backwater hick-town (the primary Walmart demographic appears to be hicks). I live in the Bay Area and there are 10 Tower Records within 20 miles and only 5 Walmarts. Fact: living in a populated area results in better selection.

  110. Target is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Houston Wallmarts are dirty and the people that shop there are nasty. People drive in from the ghetto to shop at Wallmart.

    1. Re:Target is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well - I - never!

      From the ghetto?! *gasp* Savages! *feeling faint, fanning self*

      We civilized folk must keep such debris of society out of our stores. I shall write a letter to the honorable Sen. Jim Crowe today expressing my appall.

  111. WOW! What kind of loser are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously got fired from Wal-Mart.

    If you can't hack it there, flipping burgers must be too complicated for you, too.

  112. Shrt review and comparison of Netflix to WalMart by Diskord · · Score: 2, Informative

    I tried the Wal-Mart service earlier in the year, and unless they drastically can improve their delivery times, Netflix doesn't have anything to worry about for quite a while. I had used Netflix for about 2 years, and generally was decently satisfied with their service, although their constant changing of rates was annoying and off putting. As an example, if I rented a DVD from NetFlix that had immediate availability, I would recieve the DVD approximately 2 days later. Not a bad turn around. Contrast that to Wal-Mart, which first, must have a drastically smaller inventory (or not as friendly of a reservation system to new buyers as Netflix) because almost all DVD's had a long wait. On movies that were available now, the EARLIEST I ever recieved a DVD was 5 days after I had ordered. Now I realize that proximity to distribution centers probobly greatly affects transit time, but for myself the inventory of Netflix coupled with quicker deliver time made me switch back.

  113. Look out netflix, here comes big blue by perrin5 · · Score: 1

    Seriously people, if BLOCKBUSTER, who rents movies for a living, can't make inroads into netflix's customer base, what makes you think Wal-Mart will?

    Netflix started first, they have the word of mouth to become the next e-bay. It doesn't matter what names try to expand into their business, as soon as they turn profitable, they have proven their business model. Price competition doesn't matter if the turnaround time sucks, or if the selection is of censored movies, or if the customer support is crap. Raise your hand if you really want to purchase products from Mal-Mart*.

    As I have seen mentioned, Netflix's whole concept is validated by the slow rush to the market by more and more brick and mortar stores. They have advertising agreements with Best Buy, And I think I saw an ad on Yahoo, so they're already started.

    Go netflix.

    --
    hmmmm?
  114. No Gay - Themed Movies by TaterBoss · · Score: 2, Informative

    One reason I won't be switching to Wal-Mart's service is the total lack of any gay-themed movies. And, I don't expect they will attempt to reach this market. NetFlix did some cleaning a year ago and removed all the softcore stuff, but left behind the hard-to-find gay-themed movies, some of which are quite good. "Metrosexuality" was great... short films series... none to be found at Wal-Mart. I admit, I'm gay so my judgement on this is slanted, but at the same time, isn't Wal-Mart's? If they judge this kind of movie wrong to offer, what else are they keeping from the public? Remember, Wal-Mart is the same company that refuses to sell certain games for PC / PS2, etc and even some movies due to content. Hell... the Drudge Report said the other day that Wal-Mart was going to start covering up some women's magazines due to obscene content! Hey, the word "SEX" was on a cover with Jennifer Anniston - I've been OBSCENED!!! Thank goodness Wal-Mart is around to protect us all. Praise be to Sam.

    1. Re:No Gay - Themed Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe not everyone agrees that men fucking other men should be socially accepted and embraced.

    2. Re:No Gay - Themed Movies by TaterBoss · · Score: 1

      I agree that not everyone embraces gays. But, that's a personal choice. What Wal-Mart appears to do, is make choices for us. No "bad" movies, no "bad" games, no "bad" magazines... do you want a business making this decision for you? As an individual, I choose not to frequent a business that makes these decisions for me. But, I'm sure others out there appreciate the coddling. I prefer to be shocked and amused by what a business chooses to put on their shelves, rather than have shelves full of white boxes and black text. Would you like some "Corn Flakes" or "Tasty Loops?" How about "Generic Horror Movie with Offensive Nudity and Gore Removed?" Do we want to live in a world that dresses like constipated uptights, watches Pat Robertson, considers "Wheel of Fortune" a guilty pleasure, hums along to Pat Boone, and goes to bed by 9? Egad! I'm a-swooning! Give me the "How the hell can they sell that" once in a while! Show me a place that rents "I Spit on Your Grave" and I'll pay a visit.

    3. Re:No Gay - Themed Movies by reiggin · · Score: 1
      What Wal-Mart appears to do, is make choices for us. No "bad" movies, no "bad" games, no "bad" magazines... do you want a business making this decision for you?

      Businesses make decisions for you ALL THE TIME! If they didn't, you'd have stores much bigger than Walmart.

      A couple of years ago, grocery stores in the South (including Walmart) stopped carrying Maurice's Barbeque Sauce because of Maurice Bessinger's rabid stance on the Confederate Flag (he's based in SC) and the fact that he is pretty much an open racist (he denies it but it's obvious to anyone who's ever read one of his press releases or been into one of his restaurants). The point: Is it bad that Walmart and other groceriers decided to stop supporting that racist punk? I doubt you'd argue with that. But you will argue when they make other decisions for you; especially those concerning the stuff you'd like to buy. Businesses make decisions based on what they think is the best practice for their public image. Disney does the same. And the SBC boycotts them for it. That is the SBC's decision. I don't agree with it but it's their right. And it's your right to boycott Walmart if you'd like. But don't gripe about it not being fair for them to make decisions on what to carry and how to market it. There are PLENTY of other places to acquire what you seek and Walmart leaves those niche markets alone to thrive.

      Capitalism + Bill of Rights = Great Liberty.

      P.S. This isn't meant to be OT or Trollish or Flamebait. I'm only commenting on Walmart's marketing practice as they relate to DVD selection. Mod accordingly.

  115. Taxes, business and Wal*Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget how local city governments like to tax the hell out of downtown business in order to give good ol' Mayor Quimby some more $$$$.

    If you want downtowns to thrive, don't blame Wal-Mart. Look at the vampires sucking away all the small business' profits and forcing them to raise prices. These city governments even encourage sprawl, since the taxes provide disincentive to locate in town.

  116. You claimed political/religious censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You claimed political and religious censorship. I have no doubt that the censor the R rated stuff. However, where is the evidence of political and religious censorship? If they carry Chomsky and the Q'uran, what is the problem?

    1. Re:You claimed political/religious censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it sells, fucktard. Look at how they yanked Godsmack cd's because one song had the word suicide in it, or how they recently decided to pull Maxim type magazines.

  117. Service will be slow by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 1

    What is really different is the number of distribution centers: Wal-Mart will have 6, NetFlix has 18, and is opening more this year. Looking at Wal-Mart's locations, I would only get 2-day service from them, while I get overnight service from NetFlix because they have a distribution center in my city. This means that I would get half as many movies under WalMart's $18.87 3-movie plan as I do under NetFlix's $19.99 3-movie plan. That's not exactly a bargain if you ask me.

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  118. Netflix could stand some competition by Deacon+Jones · · Score: 1
    Slashdot article itself points out flaws

    Plenty of bad ratings at epinions.com as well

    Oh, and by the way I bought Pulp Fiction Special(collectors?) edition from Wal-Mart--completley undedited. Some people need to chill.

    --
    I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
  119. Free Markets Rule! by Omega1045 · · Score: 1

    I use NetFlix, and enjoy their service. Here is to Wal-Mart driving down the prices a little. I love living in a free market.

    Disclaimer: 20 million other posts are probably say the same thing, but I had to get my $0.02 in.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  120. Wal-Mart makes NIKE by Archfeld · · Score: 2, Informative

    look like philanthropists. When Nike abandons a plant because of safety concerns, Wal-Mart negotiates a rent decrease and moves in...

    I have been a netflix fan for a long time now, and Wal-Mart would have to pay ME to buy ANYTHING from them...
    Just check out www.corpwatch.org and search on WalMart, there's plenty to read...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Wal-Mart makes NIKE by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, doesn't paint them in a terribly flattering light does it. Goes to show that the minimum wage system in this country is seriously broken. Minimum wage should prove for living at the poverty line at a minimum.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    2. Re:Wal-Mart makes NIKE by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Minimum wage should prove for living at the poverty line at a minimum.

      I don't think that's the purpose of minimum wage. There are a number of high school students who work for minimum wage, and they certainly aren't paying for a place to live or food to put on the table. This is not to say that Wal-Mart isn't guilty of some rather grevious attrocities. We should probably ask whether there should be another standard wage level that gets applied to people who are not considered dependents.

      By the way, the "scenario" that was profiled on CorpWatch.org seems to be similar to what some of my friends who were starting out in the education field were facing. They had unbelievably low salaries, and were forced to band together in groups of three or four to afford a place to live. In the case of the single parent who couldn't afford living expenses, that's probably what they would have to do as well. Not a very good quality of life, though.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    3. Re:Wal-Mart makes NIKE by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      There are a number of high school students who work for minimum wage...

      Actually, employers can pay minors $4.25/hr, $2.40 less per hour than minimum wage, if they are employed for less than 90 days. This provision means that the minimum wage is not intended for high school students at all.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    4. Re:Wal-Mart makes NIKE by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Actually, employers can pay minors $4.25/hr, $2.40 less per hour than minimum wage, if they are employed for less than 90 days. This provision means that the minimum wage is not intended for high school students at all.

      I disagree. The $4.25/hr you refer to is known as an "introductory wage," and since it only applies for 90 days, most high school students who work after school would soon be earning the full minimum wage. Not like that's anything to brag about, though.... :-)

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    5. Re:Wal-Mart makes NIKE by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Touché! I was in a "summer job" mindset. Didn't stop to think about part-timers. You're right it's still nothing to write home about though.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    6. Re:Wal-Mart makes NIKE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WalMart pays minimum wage? That's news to me. Last year my son, a full-time college student, worked for Wallyworld and made a little over $17,000.00.

      Figure that one out, Einstein.

  121. Not good so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I signed up today. The first movie I choose (Waiting for Goofman) is listed as "Very long wait", which means more than 30 days.

    I think I won't be staying after the 30 day trial period.

  122. too late... by kajoob · · Score: 1

    you've already been handling ass pennies on a daily basis ;)

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  123. Fixed rental queues by portwojc · · Score: 1

    Hey if Walmart isn't like netflix that is giving new subscribers priority they'll have my account.

    I dropped netflix after reading that article post a while back about netflix. Before that I was wondering why things slowed down with them...

  124. OT, I know. (Re:Maybe not such bad news ) by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Netflix at least has a fighting chance, Netscape didn't.

    Hard, though, to have sympathy for a company that nicknamed their product "Mosaic Killer", AKA Mozilla.

    Microsoft may have fscked a number of companies, but anyone entering a market where people are already giving away their product should not be surprised when somebody else comes in and gives away their product.

    --

    Java is the blue pill
    Choose the red pill
  125. I wonder though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the recent news of Wal-Mart covering up provacative magazines at their stores (even mags such as vogue not just maxim) would they do something similar with their DVDs? Would they have a net nanny for the search engine?

    Might be good for their bottom line if they did but I am not sure I would use such a service.

  126. I'm joining because I hate Wal*Mart by jridley · · Score: 2, Informative

    I grew up in a small town, as did many of my friends. In nearly every town, a Wal*Mart has moved in and crushed all the local businesses. I know, capitalism, best for the consumer, etc. and all that. But it is turning every place in the US into a McTown, all with exactly the same things in them.

    I'm currently a NetFlix subscriber, but I churn 20 movies a month. They lose money big time on me. I'm going to move to Wal*Mart, and if they don't try to throttle me somehow, I'll be more than happy to have them lose money on me.

    1. Re:I'm joining because I hate Wal*Mart by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Damn. That's the reason I sue Amazon. I figure that if they are still losing money, I may as well buy from them.

  127. This is a very old news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot - you are more and more crappy - no
    info about programming contests, old news ...

    This was in "Wired" in March.

    I am renting from Walmart for over a month
    but it sucks in comparison to Netflix:

    1. Choice is much more limited
    2. The processing is much slower for me:

    When I get a movie from Netflix, I copy it to
    HDD and return DVD immediately - the new movie
    comes on the average in 3 working days
    (sometime sin 2).

    When I do the same with Walmart - the new one
    comes in 5 days.

  128. YOUR A DUMB SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    99.987% of the people that read this website run linux or own an apple computer and like to fuck other guys.

    I agree she has some nice knockers but I run windows XP so what do I know.

  129. Are you a new Netflix customer? by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1

    That's probably because you're a new Netflix customer. You are prioritized for popular titles. Wait around a year or so. I canceled my Netflix membership after two years partially because I was never able to get the popular titles I wanted.

    1. Re:Are you a new Netflix customer? by TheRealStyro · · Score: 1

      I've been with NetFlix since '99 (I believe). I can usually get new titles just as they are released. This week was 'Tears of the Sun' and last week was 'Die Another Day'. Received them both on the Tuesday they released. I have had no problems with the NetFlix queue system.

      --
  130. I forsee many copies of... by Rai · · Score: 4, Funny

    'Deliverance' and 'Hee-Haw's Greatest Moments'

    1. Re:I forsee many copies of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your just a sore looser!
      Try to overcome the inferiority complex!

  131. Wal-Mart, NetFlix both missing the boat by mblase · · Score: 3, Informative

    I dropped my subscription to NetFlix sometime last year and replaced it with GreenCine, even though they were slightly more expensive and took longer to ship to me. Why? Selection.

    I liked getting anime DVDs from Netflix, but the way they kept buying only the first two or three DVDs of a six- or eight-disc series annoyed the frick out of me. I found GreenCine after a short search at Yahoo, and the site promised a greater selection of independent and anime rentals -- and they were absolutely right.

    My point is, the real advantage of the online rental market should be greater selection of eclectic titles. Have you ever shopped for movies at Wal-Mart? Mainstream stuff all the way. Their CD selection is even worse. I started buying books and CDs from Amazon.com not for the prices, but because their selection was that much better, even if I lost the advantage of immediate gratification.

    If people want to rent mainstream videos, then they'll always do it at Blockbuster or Hollywood Video, where they're promised "guaranteed in stock" even if they only keep it for two nights. Immediacy is more important than "keep it as long as you like" in most consumers' minds; if it weren't, we wouldn't have movie channels on cable TV at all.

    So kudos to Wal-Mart for entering a new arena (for them), and may NetFlix be driven to excel even more because of it. But until they both realize the real advantages of what they're doing and offer a wider and more complete selection, I'll happily ignore them both.

    1. Re:Wal-Mart, NetFlix both missing the boat by binarytoaster · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

      Ever since I left the US, I've been looking for a Netflix-like service to replace them (yes, Netflix will ship to APO as well, but it's not worth it.)

      They even pass the acid test - they still have La Blue Girl on the list. Interesting story - when I was still a member of Netflix, I worked my way through their completed anime series. I went through LBG, then decided maybe I'd get something else in the same line.

      So I went looking for Cool Devices. No go. Couldn't find it. But it was there two months ago, wtf? Searched for LBG... it also returned no matches.

      Then I went to look in my email for the "You have returned" message and followed the link. They still had a page for it, but it was now marked "Unavailable". Obviously they caved to some idiot with their head up their ass who was bitching about porn.

      But this place even has anime that I thought wasn't coming out until next week! Kick ass!

  132. Wal-Mart for the masses, Netflix for film buffs... by aquarian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps Wal-Mart will surpass Netflix in total sales, perhaps by many times. However, I see these two companies not competing directly.

    Wal-Mart has never been anything but a mass market company, with lowest-common-denominator sensibilities. In any category, *especially* movies and music, they sell a relatively short list of only the most popular, mass market items. Michael Jackson? Sure. The latest college radio, big city hipster fave? Forget it, even if they're selling in the millions.

    Netflix, OTOH, has always catered to film buffs. They'll probably lose share to Wal-mart in the most popular releases, but will continue to grow elsewhere. So, if you want "Dumb and Dumber IV," go to Wal-Mart, but if you want the Cannes winners, indie greats, art films or classics, you're more likely to find them at Netflix.

  133. Walmart's Grocery Business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand that Walmart is tops in the Grocery Business too. The Walmart down the road from where I live has a wonderful grocery department inside, with very nice prices (low). The competition has retreated to concentrate on senior citizens with limited mobility, (unable or unwilling to drive an extra 5 miles through horrendous traffic to get to Walmart), and raise the hell out of their prices to gouge the old folks, and make up for lost revenue.

  134. I've never noticed any censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And hell, they sell Grand Theft Auto 3/GTA3: Vice City.

    Xenosaga still has ample KOS-MOS breasticles.

    Yeah, video games, clear.

    Conan the Barbarian is still chock full of blood. Other movies are still chock full of cursing, sex and violence.

    Music? If you buy actual music at Wal-Mart, as far as I know, you have nothing to fear.

    Maybe, by some slim chance, they refuse to sell (c)rap shit that does nothing but glorify rape, the murder of police officers, drug use, et cetera.

    Good for them. Now, if they'd stop following one of the people I know around with the security cameras, at four in the morning, whilst announcing the departments over the PA system, I'd have no beef with them.

    (Geez, you'd think the guy in a leather trenchcoat who ogles things in the electronics department but rarely buys anything would be freaking them out. You'd be wrong, though! I feel left out. I guess I should go stand in cosmetics for more than ten minutes. *snort*)

  135. From the Fortune article: by pmz · · Score: 1

    "Economists now credit the company's Everyday Low Prices with contributing to Everyday Low Inflation..."

    "...more than one-eighth of U.S. productivity growth between 1995 and 1999 could be explained 'by only two syllables: Wal-Mart.'"

    "With little fanfare and no advertising, Wal-Mart's Ol' Roy dog food ... has charged past Nestle's Purina as the world's top-selling brand. Great Value bleach outsells Clorox in some stores."

    "Wal-Mart is the world's biggest grocer"

    "Well, what about Microsoft? Its margins are--can this be right?--44%, and it's sitting on $38 billion in cash. Mr. Sam would not approve. Log on to walmart.com and you'll find $199 computers powered by a fledgling Windows competitor, Lindows. "

    "Wal-Mart's turnover is so rapid that 70% of its merchandise is rung up at the register before the company has paid for it."

    "Wal-Mart will open roughly a store a day this year."

    I don't know whether to cheer them on or cower in fear. This company single-handedly affects inflation, of all things. Holy shit.

  136. HDTV and walmart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not news, the real news is that Wal-Mart is carrying HDTV televisions in their stores now which means that we will see a dramatic slide in prices for HDTV.

  137. propane tanks by zogger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That "walmart only, propietary" deal happend to me with a couple of my small refillable propane tanks. I got two from walmart, turns out they put a "walmart_only_ thread on the filler valve, you are forced to get filler-ups/exchanges only at walmart then, unlike my other ones that I can take anyplace handy.

    I didn't mind walmart when sam walton was still kicking, it seemed like they at least made an effort to have "made in USA" stuff in abundance, and didn't have weird polices like this propane deal (and what they will probably do with DVDs-good call there), but now,since he's died and who knows who is running it as an economic division of the chinese peoples liberation army, I've about almost completely removed them from sucking on my wallet. Once in a great while I get stuck, and have no recourse but to go in there, and every time I see aisle after aisle of lost homes, lost jobs, lost equity, lost cars, basically a lot of lost hopes and dreams disgusied as cheap trinkets, like what were used to purchase manhattan island. Trinkets, ohhh shiny and cheap.

    They are that-cheap. Cheap as in price, cheap as in quality, but very expensive with a bigger look at when once those dollars leave the shores of the US and cease acting as an economic force multiplier.

    1. Re:propane tanks by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

      Are you sure they are Walmart only threads? I know there were some changes to the standard fittings on propane tanks recently (when I say recently I mean in the last few years). At least that is the case with the small tanks for use with grills (what are those, 15 lb. tanks?). I don't have any references on it, but the old fittings required a crescent wrench to un-screw and the new ones have a different fitting that allows a hand-tightened hose. The old hoses still work too, I didn't have to change the hose on my grill when I bought a new tank.

    2. Re:propane tanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are most of the companies that manufacture the cheap goods you are referring to are US companies, just using cheap labor from china and other countries.

      So the money still has an "economic force multiplier", dont worry.

    3. Re:propane tanks by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      --no it doesn't, it's a net loss. We are running hundreds of billions a year trade balance deficit. We are also at a net loss of over 3 million real jobs over just the past 3 years. Our currency is down over 1/4 against the euro when you run the high/low split. Our unemployment rate is so bad they had to adjust how they count the rate by dropping people who have exhausted unemployment insurance benefits. Some economists estimate the real unemployment might be almost double the official ~ 6% level. They also include people who are only working extremely part time, say a few hours a week, that's classed as fully employed. They dropped food and fuel from the consumer cost of living indices to keep the figures looking good. The recent so called debt figures do not reflect the contractural debt that the government has. They claim we are only at 4.x trillion estimated debt, yet the real figures are closer to 45 trillion, trillion with a T. The fortune 500 companies have almost universally no way to pay for their contractural pension programs, they are busted. Pension insurance last year went into the red from years in the black from only a few companies tapping in to it due to bankruptcy, just a few, with over 38,000 companies still being a part of it and many of which are close to bankruptcy themselves. Most major banks derivatives exposures are so dismal, you'd be hard pressed to see much notice of it in the main broadcast media.

      On and on. Walmart is not the sole cause, but it's a wonderful representation of the economic problems over all and what lead to them. If not-manufacturing inside the US was working that great, we would be running a trade surplus, and we aren't. It's a temporary cheap trinket fake out, the bone tossed to keep those still working faked out that their jobs will be safe or something. It's a lie. I KNOW people working at walmart, ALL of them were making more money at their previous jobs, jobs that have poofed in the "new economy", poofed as in not disappeared, but sent elsewhere. The profits aren't going to the people who built these various companies up except at the extreme top levels. It's a universal averaging down.

      Sorry, it's sucking in the US and getting worse,well, war factories are doing ok, that's about it.

      I can easily remember when a normal even lower middle class blue collar job was more than ample for decent home ownership, supporting a lot of kids, a good car, family vacations and so on. It is NOT that way now. The economy is sliding on the inertia of insane out to lunch credit,outsourcing, selling of assets, it's called in the olden days and warned against "eating your seed corn". It looks like fat city until that seed corn is gone, then you have nothing left to plant. That's a rural reference analogy, I have another I like to use as well. The economy now is akin to a carpenter who on friday night pawns all his tools and his work truck, all weekend long he looks "rich", why look at "that quarters" immense profitability! Comes monday morning he's out of a job. When it's one job like that it's easy to see it's nuts, when a nation does it, with the results being manipulated and shilled from stratospheric levels by the ones who actually profit from it, and the results take a little longer to "trickle down",they call it "good business".

      Nutso, there's no proof whatsoever the economy is getting better other than in the snake oil salesmans infomercials. 30 year mortgages for homes and 5 year car notes are no indicator of wealth production and creation, they are the opposite of it in fact, when those same two major asset indicators used to be only 10 years and 18 months respectfully, and not that long ago, and when we were a creditor nation and not a debtor nation, and our trade balances were almost all in our favor. those are indicators of an over all good economy. And even the snake oil salesman have no way to dodge the trade imbalance issue, that's serious folding money you are talking about. If their scheme worked as advertised, we should be seeing an almo

    4. Re:propane tanks by zogger · · Score: 1

      yes, they are, two changes recently with propane tanks. Look closer at your tanks, there are two threads associated with them. One was by law, they changed them due to government safety regulations, all new tanks sold have those sorts of new internal valves, with the indicator being the triangular handle. the old ones phased out I think last april or so, some where's around that time. Walmart went one step further, the outer part you as a consumer don't use, where the tanks attach to the big bulk tanks for refilling, got changed to a propietary design and thread (at least around where I am, I don't know if it's all the way around the nation), that is only available at walmart. It looks like they picked one specific sub contractor for that, or it might be some daisy chained corporation that walmart uses so they can buy and sell stuff from themselves, a normal corporate razzle dazzle paper work shuffle.

      That's two changes for them, only one for everyone else, they just did their's at the same time and it slid through, and theirs costs more than others I've seen, by around 1-2$ an exchange or fill.

    5. Re:propane tanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...who knows who is running it as an economic division of the chinese peoples liberation army"

      It's being run by his five children. When he died, they split the ownership equally.

    6. Re:propane tanks by iocat · · Score: 1
      No matter how you slice it, Wal-Mart is just evil. They totally fuck their distributers and contribute to deflationary pressure in all sectors the economy, without passing much savings on to the consumer. It's cheaper, but not by much.

      Worse, for the consumer, their stuff SUCKS. How does a company make a profit on the stuff they sell at Wal-Mart for way less than other stores? They make it as cheaply as possible. Home Depot is the same deal: many companies sell "exclusive" Home Depot versions of products that are total shit -- appliances and fixtures especially.

      Honestly, the only place that sells quality merchandise anymore is Sears, and Orchard Supply Hardware (which I suspect is owned by Sears, since it sells Craftsman brand tools). Plus your local hardware store.

      I've never been to a Lowes so I can't comment on that.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    7. Re:propane tanks by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

      I didn't buy mine at Wal-mart, so I think I am safe. Wow, I can't believe they did that! I wonder what the motivation was. I suppose it forces you to go back to Wal-mart to get it filled or something?

    8. Re:propane tanks by zogger · · Score: 1

      Yes, it appears to do that. I have 6 of the smaller 20 lb tanks (in small tanks the propane is sold by the pound, larger tanks by the gallon, by the pound is a rip off anyway). 2 of mine are from chinamart, refill there only. I got them thinking they were the same, oh well. I used those the first winter we got our RV, then we got two hundrd lb tanks which if you whine the bulk truck will fill up. After we move I'll probably rent or buy a really large tank, then buy propane in the summer when it's cheaper. We buy our gasoline and diesel bulk, too, comes in *real handy* sometimes and it's a nice stash in case we experience an emergency with associated "market irregularities". I try to have a minimum of one to two years of at least basic everything on hand all the time, food, fuel, etc. We could use wood but it's a pain in the tushie for an RV to do it, so I just use propane now. That's cooking, and to run the furnace on cold weather, etc. For electric we have our solar panels, they don't provide a lot, but it's paid off juice for at least two to three decades estimated, that part I really like. I'll probably get more of them this year..

  138. Wal-Mart: investing in kids since day one by fuddes · · Score: 1

    Will Wal-Mart employ illegal child labor to handle this service, like they do with their clothing? Oh boy, sign me up!

  139. Walmart - Sloooooooooow by meehawl · · Score: 1

    I've tried the Walmart trial twice. It sometimes takes them over a week to turnaround a disk, compared to Netflix's 2-3 day turnaround. Based on this, I'd say Walmart are not good value for money.

    --

    Da Blog
  140. Porno Netflix Workalike by meehawl · · Score: 1
    And if anyone out there knows of a service like this already, please, let me know :-D
    WantedList
    --

    Da Blog
  141. Pop-up and under adds + Spam by Gallifrey · · Score: 1

    I will switch to Walmart if the service is comparible for one reason: I hate pop-ups, pop-unders and spam and Netflix engages in all three. I will be glad to switch from a company that engages in such low life advertising, even if they do provide good service.

  142. Please direct me to the national decency standard by Vicegrip · · Score: 1

    so I can suitably reprogram my deviant brain.
    Nobody should be thinking for themselves and making informed consumer purchases, corporations should do this for us. Choice is for pinko commie capitalism terrorists who want to corrupt our holy-culture with reprobent and criminal infidel thoughts. ... oh wait... I bought my copies of the matrix and die-hard from Walmart, false alert.

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
  143. Netflix *Does* Penalize Regular Renters by meehawl · · Score: 3, Interesting
    frequent renters get lower priority
    It was covered in Slashdot before, the original analysis is... An Analysis of Netflix's DVD Allocation System I've noticed some odd tweaks that Netflix use. Sometimes weeks can go by when I don't get any of the movies on my "Very Long Wait" schedule (which I have all collected right at the start of my 450+ queue. But if I register a broken or scratched disc, then suddenly I get a small flurry of "VLW" movies, that surges, then subsides. SO I figure their CRM system does some sort of temporary promotion to keep you happy.
    --

    Da Blog
  144. Re:More atrocities from the terrorist Israelis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi troll. I hope all that all Hamas die in their cars from a gunship attack. the more flames the better.

  145. I only shop at Wal-Mart by dentar · · Score: 1

    ...if I absolutely, positively, have to have what I need and can't find it elsewhere.

    Otherwise I'm supporting abuse of children, abuse of elderly people, and the demise of small business.

    Unfortunately, the trailer park masses all love Wal-Mart and don't see it for what it is.

    http://www.walmartwatch.com

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  146. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  147. So it is OK for Netflix to have a monopoly... by piku · · Score: 1

    ...but as soon as Wal-Mart threatens it you cry foul?

  148. Be careful about mailing lag time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a current NetFlix customer but I signed up for the Wal-Mart DVD rental free month just to compare them (this was 6 months ago). I get NetFlix movies in my mailbox THE NEXT DAY and they are returned from my mailbox THE NEXT DAY. Wal-Mart's service took two or even three days each way. That really cuts into the amount of DVDs you can rent each month. Six months ago they apparently only had the one distribution center in Georgia. But seeing the list of six they have today, none is near my home like the NetFlix distro center is. Bottom line: check where the distro centers are, it makes a big difference!

  149. Wal Mart Sux! Why do they want more! by cyberguyd · · Score: 1

    I am absolutely fed up with WalMart, "Redneck Sears", they were somewhat respectable when Sam was in charge. They at least sold Made in USA stuff. Then it went to where we can get it reasonably else it's foreign. Now it is probably hard to find anything in that store from USA. Also, here in Tallahassee, in two instances they closed one store and opened one about a mile away. Then they pay rent on that building to keep it vacant or put such restrictions on it that no one can use it. We have TWO (!) shopping centers here that are nearly empty because of this, then it drives out those other small strip shops because there is no magnet store. I wonder if anti trust laws can be applied to real estate. After all they are monopolizing a resource. And now they want to rent me my DVDs, maybe even sanitized. Unfortunately, all of my co workers just sing Wal Mart praises. Sorry Wal Mart, you get no dollars from me! Screw 'em.

  150. What;s the problem? by NavelFozz · · Score: 1

    What is so unfair about Wal-Mart moving into the online DVD rental business?

    Maybe now we will see some "innovations" in Netflix's offerings?

  151. Wal-Mart never has anything I want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found this to be very odd. Here was this big store, and yet they had not one single thing I needed. Groceries? They can't beat Kroger in price or variety or coupon redemption. Entertainment? I can find what I need online, cheaper. Clothes? You got to be kidding.

    The day I HAVE to go to Wal-Mart because it's the best place to get stuff, I'll shoot myself.

    1. Re:Wal-Mart never has anything I want. by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      I found this to be very odd. Here was this big store, and yet they had not one single thing I needed. Groceries? They can't beat Kroger in price or variety or coupon redemption. Entertainment? I can find what I need online, cheaper. Clothes? You got to be kidding.

      I agree. I dont shop wallyworld much either.. unless its something I _know_ they carry, at a better price than the competitors and I need it _now_. (Leap product christmas shopping comes to mind..).

      However, if they are having a sale on those one-off brand business casual slacks, I'll go buy three pairs. I have to wear em for work. I _only_ wear em for work. So why spend what they want at a "real" store when i'm going to wreck them crawling around under peoples desks anyway?

      But I dont really buy much there.. but it totally depends on what kind of town you live in. Wal-mart is useless in say, NYC.. but out in burbzilla.. where you can end up driving forty miles to hit four different stores.. it works. And its attractive to a lot of people.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  152. Terrible implementation. Netflix needn't worry by eduardodude · · Score: 2, Informative

    I tried their DVD service for a month late last winter. I've used Netflix for a year or so, and thought it worth a try.

    What a disapointment. The UI is terrible, making it awkward to browse titles. They had none of Netflix's 5-star rating functionality. I've found that to be one of the best features, since it makes decent recommendations to me based on my preferences (much like Tivo), and it also lets you view highly rated users. At Walmart you're on your own.

    They also had terrible stocking problems, although presumably they will fix that. Lots of "long wait" movies, compared to Netflix where that's quite rare.

    Plus the movies took longer to go round trip. In Chicago, the nearest center is in Minnesota, and I get 4-6 day turnaround. Walmart was consistantly several days longer. This varies according to your distance from distribution centers, but friends in other places also have gotten snappy turnaround from Netflix.

    Anyway, give it a try for the trial period, but also try Netflix. Walmart has a long way to go to catch up.

  153. WalFart is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I will never rent/buy/steal/accept anything free from Walfart.
    I will never park my car in their parking lot.
    I avoid letting their advertising graze my eyeballs.
    Walfart is evil.
    Walfart is the retail incarnation of M$.
    If Walfart drives Netflix out of business, I will never rent a DVD online again.
    If I were starving and Walfart had the last box of jelly donuts on the planet, . . .

  154. Walmart's too clean cut (in terms of movies) by gtshafted · · Score: 1

    Given Walmart's "High moral" tastes, I really doubt Netflix and Blockbuster have much to worry about. Walmart will probably never stock anything it considers too "racy or provacative".

  155. Capitalism works by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    Before you can say if capitalism works, you need to say what you think it's supposed to be achieving.

    Unless, of course, you think simply existing and smashing alternatives means it's working.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  156. Dueling DVD services by redtail1 · · Score: 1

    Given Wal-Mart's clientele, I'm assuming they don't carry Deliverance .

  157. I love Walmart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But seriously, people. Walmart provides a valuable, often overlooked service.
    Since the vast majority of my communities' vanilla/conservative/fundamental /redneck/uneducated/unwashed masses shop there and I don't, I am able to pretend they don't exist.

  158. Fsck Netflix by Stanwalters · · Score: 1

    Good riddance. I've been pissed at them since they discontinued the pay-per-rental plan, crazy me, don't want to pay $20 to rent 1 DVD a month. Wal Mart will surely not be so narrow-minded in their offerings.

  159. Re:The way we used to do it... by angle_slam · · Score: 1
    Of course this was back when you could turn around a movie with NetFlix in about 4 days.

    My Netflix turnaround is 3-4 days. If I mail back a DVD before the Saturday morning mail pickup (nice to live .5 mile from a post office), I can have a new DVD in my mailbox by Tuesday. If I mail it from work on Monday morning, I will have a DVD in my mailbox by Wed or Thu.

  160. Here's the catch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For each DVD lost or not returned, a $17.88 fee plus tax will be charged to your credit card.
    How many Netflix customers have had to report lost discs? Damn near every single person. When I was a customer my loss rate was nearly a disc a month but Netflix kept assuring me that I wasn't responsible for discs lost in the mail. I never paid a cent for those lost movies.

    Walmart wants you to take the risk during shipment despite the fact that you have no control over the packaging they'll use (everyone knows about the "STEAL ME" envelopes Netflix uses). You have no control over the security measures used in their distribution centers (everyone knows that one of the new Netflix centers was found to be a veritable black hole for DVDs). You have no control over the carrier used to trans port your DVDs (USPS in this case). You have no control over the hiring practices of Walmart (the folks who you'll be trusting to process the DVDs you're responsible for).

    Until Walmart changes this policy, I suggest y'all just sit back and wait to see what happens.

    1. Re:Here's the catch! by ArkiMage · · Score: 1

      I clicked around and found some terms of service which have this stipulation:

      You may cancel the service anytime. If you choose to cancel you will have 7 days to return the DVDs you have rented. For each DVD not returned, a $17.88 fee will be charged to your credit card.

      So that sounds a bit better than having to pay for any DVDs stolen by the mailman or honestly "lost" or whatever. I'm *I* am financially responsible for the warehouse folks and USPS folks, forget it...

    2. Re:Here's the catch! by ArkiMage · · Score: 1

      Better late than never... A reply to a query I sent Wal-Mart about this:

      Dear Mr. Dingus,

      Thank you for contacting us at Walmart.com. Your comments and questions are very important to us as we strive to meet your needs.

      We are writing you regarding DVDs that could potentially be lost in the mail. On occasion, the post office can misplace mail during transit.
      If this were to ever happen to a DVD that you are awaiting receipt of or have shipped to us, you will not be held responsible. The $17.88 charge only applies to DVDs that customers damage, lose, or choose to keep after a DVD subscription has been cancelled. We hope this answers any questions you may have.

      If we may be of further assistance, please email us at help@walmart.com, or call us at 1-800-966-6546. We're here to serve you from 7:00 AM EST
      to 2:00 AM EST, 7 days a week!

      Sincerely,

      Billy Hutto

      Customer Service at Walmart.com

  161. P2P Netflix by dcgrigsby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's another alternative: P2P style netflix. Check out mozo.

    Basic idea is that arround you -- your dorm, co-workers, etc.-- there are thousands of DVDs. If you pool them into groups and share amonst yourselves you'll never need Blockbuster.

    Statistically, it works: average DVD owner buys 15 a year, rents 30. With these numbers, the average person has access to thousands of DVDs around them already.

    And yeah, I wrote this code for this site, so I'm biased..

  162. The Key Might be Distribution Centers by BaronCarlos · · Score: 1
    I know I live close to a Distro Center for NetFlix. It takes one day for the movie to leave them and get to me. Likewise the other way around.

    Looking at the Wal-Mart distro centers, I'm 2 days away from each of the closest ones. So I'm losing out if I switch.

    Though I wonder if WallyWorld will do the same Bait and Switch that NetFlix does.

    --
    *Carlos: Exit Stage Right*

    "Geeks, Where would you be without them?"
    "Got Linux?"

  163. Impressive WallMart stats by mcguyver · · Score: 1

    To truely appreciate Wallmart you must see the stats on this article:
    http://www.business2.com/articles/mag/0, 1640,37760 ,FF.html

    Here's a good stat:
    All-time one-day sales record (Nov. 23, 2001): $1.25 billion

    With money like that backing up your competition, netflix should worry.

  164. Walmart corporate standards by alizard · · Score: 1
    Here's a description of your kind of company.

    They are anti-porn like you. The following is what they stand for, from a quote from the article linked to above. You obviously stand for the same things.

    Someday, I hope you wind up working in the kind of outsourcing operation described below. You like great companies? So go to the Third World and admire WalMart from the bottom up.

    "The work is literally sickening, since thereâ(TM)s no health and safety enforcement. Workers have constant headaches and nausea from paint-dust hanging in the air; the indoor temperature tops 100 degrees; protective clothing is a joke; repetitive stress disorders are rampant; and thereâ(TM)s no training on the health hazards of handling the plastics, glue, paint thinners, and other solvents in which these workers are immersed every day."

  165. Walmart - Good For Business, Bad For Society by meehawl · · Score: 1
    TANSTAAFL, and someone has to pay for those low prices in Walmart, typically America's new working classes, now exported into Chinese sweatshops, and displaced local retailers, now usually Walmart's captive wage slaves.

    A healthy family with a roof over its head could supply virtually all of its other basic monthly needs with one stop at a Wal-Mart Supercenter like the one here in Salina, Kansas. To me, that raised a question: Can a family whose breadwinner works at Wal-Mart afford to supply its minimum needs by shopping there? ... The bottom line: They would need an absolute minimum of $1,136 per month to cover housing, food, transportation, health care and miscellaneous expenses. Despite our best efforts, we exceeded our cashier's monthly income by $120.
    In a sense, Walmart generates its huge profits by driving its employees' wages unsustainably low. We the taxpayer then pick up the social cost of Walmart's workshop profiteering by providing these bankrupt wage slaves with a federal tax credit of just over $4000 annually (and other benefits, such as food stamps). Instead of doing the honorable thing and raising the minimum wage, we provide massive billions of dollars of corporate welfare to Walmart and enable it to post increased profits.
    the government implicitly recognizes the insufficiency of Wal-Mart wages. Our cashier's family would be eligible for an Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) of $4,140 in 2002. That would close the gap between the cashier's wage and bare survival, and provide enough additional income to lift the family just above the poverty line.
    --

    Da Blog
  166. NumberSlate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've already got lots of competition...
    Google turns up several places in the US alone.

  167. Censored Versions by Madduck · · Score: 1

    I wonder if WALMART is going to censor the versions they rent?

    http://www.diynet.com/DIY/post/1,2021,5_259640,F F. html

  168. Wal-Mart: Good for Business, Workers, Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and someone has to pay for those low prices in Walmart, typically America's new working classes"

    Yes, they pay. They pay less.

    "now usually Walmart's captive wage slaves."

    Sounds like a wonderfully evil term. Problem is, no captive wage slaves exist.

    "In a sense, Walmart generates its huge profits by driving its employees' wages unsustainably low"

    There are many ways they cut costs and waste in order to provide a better deal. The wages, far from "unsustainably low", are quite fair and have been sustained for many years.

    " Instead of doing the honorable thing and raising the minimum wage"

    The minimum wage should be abolished, not raised. Every time it is raised, people in low-eage jobs are forced out of work. Wages should be for the real value of the work, not for some imaginary number that the government pulls out of a hat that has nothing to do with anything.

    "we provide massive billions of dollars of corporate welfare to Walmart and enable it to post increased profits. "

    Give one example of corporate welfare to Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart is one of those companies that likes to pay for things itself (unlike the airlines): cost of doing business.

  169. Doctor Pepper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wal-Mart opened in my are they were selling cases of Dr. Pepper for $4 until most of the smaller grocery stores either could not compete with the prices or had to go out of business entirely. Now the prices are on average $6."

    So? If you actually drink Dr Pepper, you had a real bargain for a while there. This is a good thing. If it can be sold for less, other stores will start to sell it again.

  170. Blame Wal-Mart first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I haven't shopped at a Wal-Mart for two years and still going strong and never will if I can ever help it. I hope everyone that reads this will do the same"

    I read stories like this and it makes me go to Wal-Mart more. Yeah, blame Wal-Mart first for running their stores well. Never blame K-Mart, right, even though their awful way they run things has been headline news for a few years.

    "Naturally, traffic became nearly unbearable due to a super center being here"

    Seems like, despite the whining, people in your town really love the Wal-Mart. If they did, they would have never gone there.

  171. Grand Theft Auto at Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Grand Theft Auto: Vice City?"

    Look more closely at the package: it's really called "Grand-Old-Time Washing Autos - Nice City"

  172. You too should only shop at Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Otherwise I'm supporting abuse of children, abuse of elderly people, and the demise of small business."

    Wal-Mart is not involved in the first two, and as for the last two, the small business only kill themselves.

    "Unfortunately, the trailer park masses all love Wal-Mart and don't see it for what it is."

    No, the customers and workers know what is in their best interest. That is why you find them at Wal-Mart.

    1. Re:You too should only shop at Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wal-Mart is not involved in the first two, and as for the last two, the small business only kill themselves."

      Go do some more homework and then get back to us on that. Wal-Mart has been getting sued right and left for abuses of their employees.

      "No, the customers and workers know what is in their best interest. That is why you find them at Wal-Mart."

      They're there because they're forced. Nothing else available because Wal-Mart used their predatory practices to get into these small towns and destroy what was already there. Get a brain.

  173. Go to Frisco! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all of us live in some backwater hick-town (the primary Walmart demographic appears to be hicks). I live in the Bay Area "

    I assume you mean Frisco Bay, and not Chesapeake or another?? (Friscoans assume that their bay is the only big one in the country)

    I'm not about to go all the way to Frisco to get a CD. That is wht Napster's wonderful children are for.

  174. Wal*Mart Edit's CDs ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Try not to ignore his point, moron. Look at all the cd's Wal-Mart edits for an example"

    Where is their editing facility? Do they basically re-record them with the bad stuff out, throw away the unedited discs, and put the new ones in the jewel cases?

    Of course not. You will not be able to name an editing facility, either. Wal*Mart is just a retailer, they do not edit CDs (while of course others might edit the content further up the line.

  175. Actually, this HELPS busy folks like us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give that Walmart's probably going to want "family friendly content" editing of movies, we'll get shorter versions of all our favorite films.

    Imagine watching Clockwork Orange and Pulp Fiction, the 30 Minute Edition! w00t.

    If you don't like "kid friendly" R-rated movies, you can take your smutty wallet down to BlockBuster. Oh, wait.

    At least Netflix rents porn, right? Oh, never mind.

    "You are in a twisty maze of DVD rental outfits, all alike..."

  176. Gamefly by moogla · · Score: 1

    Netflix for Games

    Let me know how that works out for you. ;-)

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  177. and then rip it to XviD with AC3 intact... by moogla · · Score: 1

    so they can play it anytime with the same quality, all on a 80min CDR.

    Aaah yes, the good life. ;-)

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  178. Confused. . . .Wal-mart is *not* cheaper. by eDogg · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am a Netflix subscriber and am familiar with their prices/selection/service. I thought I'd check out the Walmart page to see how much cheaper they were.
    Guess what I found out? For the plan I'm on, they aren't cheaper at all. Walmart offers 3 packages, the cheapest being $15.54/month for 2 movies. Netflix offers 2 movies at a time for only $13.99/month. Now at the standard plan (3 movies), Walmart is $18.76 whereas Netflix is $19.99. To say that this $1.23 is going to quash Netflix is somewhat ridiculous. Add to that the fact that Netflix is still cheaper in the lower category and it becomes even more ridiculous.

  179. wal-mart is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wal-mart.com also sells a book called Evasion thats all about living life free (anti capitalist) and even has many accounts of stealing from wal-mart in the book! hey wal-mart your fucking retarded!

  180. No Cannibal - Themed Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    One reason I won't be switching to Wal-Mart's service is the total lack of any cannibal-themed movies. And, I don't expect they will attempt to reach this market. NetFlix did some cleaning a year ago and removed all the softcore stuff, but left behind the hard-to-find cannibal-themed movies, some of which are quite good. (mmmmm Pun intended!) "MetroMeat" was great... short films series... none to be found at Wal-Mart.

    I admit, I'm a man-eater so my judgement on this is slanted, but at the same time, isn't Wal-Mart's? I agree that not everyone embraces cannibals. But, that's a personal choice. We cannibals only eat unclaimed bodies at morgues. We're not hurting anybody.

    What Wal-Mart appears to do, is make choices for us. No "bad" movies, no "bad" games, no "bad" magazines... do you want a business making this decision for you? If they judge this kind of movie wrong to offer, what else are they keeping from the public? Goatse flicks? Jeffrey Dahmer's home kitchen videos?

    Hell... the Drudge Report said the other day that Wal-Mart was going to start covering up some women's magazines due to obscene content! Hey, the words "FRESH BLOODY MEAT" was on a cover with Jennifer Anniston - I've been HUNGERED!!! Thank goodness Wal-Mart is around to protect us all. Praise be to Sam, that pansy chicken&cow-eater.

  181. bullshit by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    No, they pay their employees what the work is actually worth.

    No, they force their employees to "finish their work" but wont give them overtime pay if that work takes more than 40 hours per week, by making them go back to work after clocking out, editing time slips, etc. And they've sent home salaried employees on slow days and docked their pay as if they were hourly.

    There is nothing unscrupulous about protecting workers by not forcing them to join unions (this is hardly "union busting").

    Somehow I don't think that keeping you from even having the option to join a union is "protecting".

    No, it is not. The money is also going to the employees, and also to local charitable efforts and contributions.

    More money stays within the community with Mom & Pops than with Wal-Mart. The owners of the Mom & Pop will be far more likely to spend their profits in the same town, as opposed to the remote chance that Sam Waltons heirs will drop by and spend some money.

    "But, shopping at walmart damages the community, which in turn hurts the individual "
    No, it does not in any way.


    You are false, denied, shot down. Wal-Mart cheats employees on their pay, works them harder, has crappier customer service, reduces the total number of available jobs and sucks money out of a community that would otherwise stay there.

  182. Re:Wal-Mart for the masses, Netflix for film buffs by updog · · Score: 1

    You'll be even more likely to find indie, art films, and classics at greencine.

  183. Nope...one of the smartest reasons for boycotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I canceled my NetFlix account because they support spammers. I emailed them about one of thier "affiliates" and they blew me off...said they could do nothing. How about cutting off that affiliates account?!? Customer service didn't even apologize.

  184. What's so bad about wal-mart? by donscarletti · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As a non-american who has never seen a wal-mart, let alone shopped at one, my knowledge of the subject comes wholly from the internet. From what I have heard it is a "Redneck superstore" that sells all your supplies like subversive family movies, old time inbread burbon, mullet combs, nigger linchin' rope, crossburning kits and cheap PCs loaded with Linux.

    May I ask someone knowledgable on the subject what can be "evil" about a department store, I have personally been to shops that are overpriced, with bad service or crappy goods but never one that is as morally black as I am told wal-mart is, come on! It's just a frigging retailer!

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    1. Re:What's so bad about wal-mart? by geighaus · · Score: 1

      Give a read to Naomi Klein's No Logo. She explains there why Walmart (as well as a dozen of other mega corporations) is evil.

  185. Wal*Mart: The Sole Superpower by superyooser · · Score: 1
    Here's some insightful analysis from timothy's Fortune link.
    Wal-Mart in 2003 is, in short, a lot like America in 2003: a sole superpower with a down-home twang. As with Uncle Sam, everyone's position in the world will largely be defined in relation to Mr. Sam. Is your company a "strategic competitor" like China or a "partner" like Britain? Is it a client state like Israel or a supplier to the opposition like Yemen? Is it France, benefiting from the superpower's reach while complaining the whole time? Or is it ... well, a Target? You can admire the superpower or resent it or--most likely--both. But you can't ignore it.
    Most vocal /.ers appear to fall into the French category; benefiting from the superpower's reach while complaining the whole time. You'll have to read the rest of the article to understand why that is true, so please RTF[riendly]A before you attempt to rebut.
  186. Re:OT, I know. (Re:Maybe not such bad news ) by Xamot · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but most of Netscape's initial employees were the students who worked on Mosaic. Not so much killing a free competitor, but one upping their previous effort. I think you read to much into "killer". This history is also why they continued to offer a free version.

    --
    ?
  187. This is old old old news by RickySilk · · Score: 1

    This is old old old news. Walmart started renting dvd's back in November of last year. I know because at the time I owned Netflix shares and it was a big hub bub which people quickly got over when they realized Walmart offering sucked. I bought the shares at around 6 and sold at around 11. Now look where they are... 22.

    I've also been a happy Netflix subscriber since 2000. I know Walmart cannot compete with the Netflix process and the fact that Netflix has huge market share.

    --
    Ricky Silk
    kung foo ezine let me waste your time.
  188. Wal*Mart facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No, they force their employees to "finish their work" "

    They stand over then with guns? Right.....

    "Somehow I don't think that keeping you from even having the option to join a union is "protecting"."

    They won't stop you from joining a union and giving dues to them. No one will.

    "More money stays within the community with Mom & Pops than with Wal-Mart."

    No more, no less than Wal-Mart.

    "The owners of the Mom & Pop will be far more likely to spend their profits in the same town,"

    Maybe, maybe not.

    "You are false, denied, shot down. Wal-Mart cheats employees on their pay, works them harder, has crappier customer service"

    No, they pay their employees a fair wage. Crappier customer service? I've compared Wal*Mart to a variety of discount and regular department stores, and Wal*Mart beats them all.

    "and sucks money out of a community that would otherwise stay there."

    Compared to higher priced stores, at least they suck out less money because the prices are lower :)

    1. Re:Wal*Mart facts by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      They stand over then with guns? Right.....

      Are you trolling or just being obtuse? Its call the gun of "if you leave don't bother comming back".

      They won't stop you from joining a union and giving dues to them. No one will.

      Sure they can. Wont do you much good trying to found a union when you don't have a job anymore because you've been fired.

      "More money stays within the community with Mom & Pops than with Wal-Mart."
      No more, no less than Wal-Mart.
      "The owners of the Mom & Pop will be far more likely to spend their profits in the same town,"
      Maybe, maybe not.


      Its not rocket science, Chimpo. Is the owner of Mom & Pop Shumwidgits going to go out of his way to not spend any money in his hometown of Jerkwater USA? Probably not. Is a Wal-Mart heir likely to drive by Jerkwater USA and spend any cash there? No. Lets see, what's the word I'm looking for here....oh yeah: DUH!

      No, they pay their employees a fair wage.

      Fair my ass. If you like living below the poverty line, more power to you. Most people however, do not.

      Wal*Mart beats them all.

      If you like waiting in line for 10 minutes before talking to some girl working at the counter who then has to call over a manager, which takes another 30 minutes, then sure. You can take a poll but I think you've find that you're still in the minority here.

    2. Re:Wal*Mart facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sure they can. Won't do you much good trying to found a union when you don't have a job anymore because you've been fired."

      That is what unions do. They have non-managers interfere with managment affairs (work rules), and hike wages way above the real value of the work, and force the operation to close or relocate.

      Worse yet, the union thugs like get lazy, quit their jobs, and laze about with signs and insult the actual workers who want to do something productive (a "strike", complete with assaults and harassment of real workers)

      Welcome to the rust belt. Great jobs unions do to protect jobs when they provide many incentives for employers to do with fewer employees.

      "If you like living below the poverty line, more power to you. Most people however, do not."

      Regardless of the poverty line, the wage is fair. It is for the actual value of the work. If you can't live in it, don't work there. Or, find a room-mate or two and live on less.

      " Its call the gun of "if you leave don't bother comming back"."

      Is that English? Does it even make sense?

  189. Free - pro-capitalist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " wal-mart.com also sells a book called Evasion thats all about living life free (anti capitalist)"

    Anti-capitalism is otherwise known as Stalinism. That is the least-free system there ever has been.

    Your example proves the lie of someone's earlier claim that Wal-Mart censored anything that was not politically conservative.

  190. Destroy Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've gotten much spam from Netflix, and have also seen many pop-up windows from them. Wallyworld has yet to attack my system in this way. Go Sam! "Wipe them all out".

  191. Why do they hate her so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why do they hate her so? [link to hillary book at amazon.com]

    Because she hates the country so, and does nothing but propose regressive and divisive policies to make things worse for the average American (the most infamous of which is the plan to destroy health care). Not only that, she is one of those savings and loan felons. (Hey Hillary, why haven't you still turned over all those Whitewater files, after all this time ?!?!?!)

    Now she has a fiction book topping the nonfiction bestseller lists.

  192. When will WalMart start spamming? by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Yes, WalMart will be moving into NetFlix's domain. However, WalMart will not completely replace NetFlix until they start spamming like NetFlix does.

    So I say, until that day happens, "Go WalMart GO!"

    Boycott NetFlix.

  193. Naomi Klein book at Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Give a read to Naomi Klein's No Logo. She explains there why Walmart (as well as a dozen of other mega corporations) is evil."

    You can get this book at Wal-Mart. Just search on naomi klein

  194. For Wal-Mart to go out of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For Walmart to go out of business, it would require some catastrophy of Biblical proportions at this point."

    All they need is to stop serving their workers, customers, and investors. It is easier to do this than you seem to think: look at K-Mart (not out of business, of course, but severely damaged) and Montgomery Ward.

  195. Competition and Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "[Competition is good for the consumer.] "That's what Microsoft keeps saying..."

    There is a lot of competition for Microsoft. If you don't like Windows, you can use versions of Mac OS, versions of Linux and Unix, or even Amiga OS. There are probably many I've forgotten. Don't like Word? There are dozens of other word processing programs out there. Don't like "A Mess Eye Eee" ? There are many other browsers to use. Don't like Solitaire? Well, you know....

  196. Service sucks everywhere, just less at Wal-Mart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That is why they are always busy... Their service sucks, so people come in, but can't get back out the door."

    Compared to what it should be, it sucks. However, it is much better than other places. Wal-Mart typically has most of its registers manned. I've been to competing discount stores that are so understaffed that only 1 in 30 registers are in use (and these have huge lines). Or, regular department stores where the registers are in mostly abandoned islands that are hard to find anyway.

  197. Wal-Mart is good for everyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In this particular example, Wal*Mart has utterly decimated the local economy where ever they go, and replaced it with a single source that offers bland goods, poor wages for the community, and even worse employee treatment."

    They typically treat and pay their employees well, which is why they attract employees from the other places.

    "Meanwhile, all of the diversity in local trade drops to near nothing as the only place to shop for general goods becomes a company that decides what stock you will see from thousands of miles away"

    This is not true. One of the reason for Wal-Mart's success is that they stock goods in response to the demands of the local customers.

    "So much so, Wal*Mart has become known for it, and you will often find people demanding they not be allowed to move in, at town councils"

    These "Demanders" are typically braying morons representing hardly anyone (although they say they are "the community"). If the community did not like the place, they would not go there. The protesters want the government to make your own personal choices for you.

    "Do you even know what a communist is?"

    A communist is someone who wants the means of production and everything else controlled by a dictator. This is in opposition to capitalism, where personal decisions such as economic ones are left to the individuals involved (the means of production are owned by the people).

    "You seriously need to read up on this company, they are a classic example of how capitalism fails in the long term,"

    Since Wal-Mart is extremely successful; they are a good example of how "capitalism fails". How does capitalism fail? It doesn't.

    "Actually, Wal*Mart's "competition" is usually local commerce"

    Or, it is K-Mart and Target. Wal*Mart beats the local commerce by serving people better. Many of these mom and pop stores could not care a less about customers, so they open late and close early. Want to get a rake at 8:00 PM? The mom and pop hardware store would typically have been closed at least 2 and half hourse before this time. So you go to Wal*Mart, which actually wants to sell you the rake.

    "Meanwhile, all of the diversity in local trade drops to near nothing as the only place to shop for general goods"

    The opposite is true. Wal-Mart carries a bewildering variety of goods that the mom-and-pops would not even bother to carry.

  198. Re:propane tanks - boycott by leeet · · Score: 1

    More and more products aren't made in USA anymore. They are made directly in China with no distributors. Check on the tags, it says "Made in China for walmart."

    You are not forced to buy at walmart and when people will realise that it hurts their local jobs, it will be too late. Do yourself a favor, get in your car, drive your lazy ass to your LOCAL video store (not blockbuster) and help save a local job instead of funding the walton's retirement fund.
    Ok, you might pay 50 cents more, but you're giving those folks a job after all. Getting cheap goods is a double-edged sword. Besides, you get what you pay for at walmart. I'm not going to jugde the quality of some products, you be the judge...

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  199. Cheaper = better deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Getting cheap goods is a double-edged sword. Besides, you get what you pay for at walmart. I'm not going to jugde the quality of some products, you be the judge..."

    What you pay for is a better deal. If you are getting a Ghostbusters DVD, and it costs less at Wal-Mart than elsewhere, it is still the same quality DVD from Columbia.

  200. Re:OT, I know. (Re:Maybe not such bad news ) by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    It's the whole latin word order thing again, isn't it? Mozilla was a "killer mosaic", not a "mosaic killer". Note that the creator or Mosaic was the founder of Netscape.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  201. DVD rental by ripcrd · · Score: 1

    I get my movies from the library reserved via their website...you insensitive clod!!

    --
    --Somewhere there is a village missing an idiot.
  202. No matter how you slice it - WalMart is to love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No matter how you slice it, Wal-Mart is just evil"

    No way to slice it so they are evil.

    "contribute to deflationary pressure in all sectors the economy,"

    Is your name Jimmy Carter, and you'd rather shrug off the horror of inflation where incomes go down in real money? Here, have one of Jerry Ford's "WIN" buttons. I did not know Wal-Mart did this, but now that is one more reason to love them.

    "without passing much savings on to the consumer. It's cheaper, but not by much."

    Around last Christmas, I compared certain items I knew the price of at Wal-Mart to those at K-Mart. The K-Mart prices were about 30% higher. Not much difference?

    "Worse, for the consumer, their stuff SUCKS"

    Let me see. They sell the same DVD's the other places sell. They sell Kodak film. They sell those batteries with the rolling bunny. They sell Toshiba TV's. It's all the same stuff.

    "Honestly, the only place that sells quality merchandise anymore is Sears,"

    Sears? Now that place is evil. They double-charge if you use the Sears credit card. I tried to buy a $30 tool there once with CASH, and they refused to complete the purchase unless I gave them a valid home address and phone number. I asked for a manager, and was told "we don't have managers at Sears". Never had anything like this happen at Wal-Mart: it is even worse than Radio Shack giving you the 3rd degree just because you want to buy 1 battery.

    By the way, Sears sells the same sort of brands that I listed as Wal-Mart selling.

    "Plus your local hardware store."

    You mean Ace Hardware with the transparent housepaint in can?

  203. Return to other stores? by adamscottphotos · · Score: 1

    The real question for me (I log about 50,000 driving miles annually as a nature photographer) is whether I can check out a DVD from the Walmart in La Crosse, Wisconsin, and return in four days later to the Walmart in Missoula, Montana... Listening?

    --
    So quit your job, pack your bags, and move on out to snow country!
  204. Is that you, former president Clinton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There is no problem with it. But if I can't get a BJ in public, then I don't think breasts should be bared in public either"

    Is that you, Bill? Seems like you still sound bitter about getting into trouble for BJ's in a public government office.

    But, knowing you Bill, wouldn't you just rather have all the interns bare-breasted regardless of the BJ rights?

  205. My Dad can whip both your dads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See above.

  206. HORRIBLE selection by jridley · · Score: 1

    I have been a Netflix subscriber for a few months, and I just signed up for the free trial at Walmart and started moving selections from one list to another.

    Here's a selection of the movies that were NOT available from Walmart when I tried to populate over:

    Anything that wasn't in print as of this month, including about half the Bond films.
    The Matrix (!)
    Being John Malchovich (!)
    Alien, Aliens, many Disney kid's titles, Scooby-Doo and some other Cartoon Network titles, NO Doctor Who at all, only the first 4 out of a couple dozen available Farscape discs, Willow, Goodwill Hunting, old stuff like Buck Privates, All About Eve, Mad Max.

    At that point I gave up. I got about 150 movies moved over, and figured I'd keep both subs going for a while to finish off the stuff that Netflix had before moving, but there are too many. I'd have to rent'n'rip as fast as possible for a year with Netflix just to get the stuff that Walmart doesn't have. I'll just stick with Netflix.

    1. Re:HORRIBLE selection by spike+it · · Score: 1

      Think about it this way - if Walmart isn't going to offer hits such as The Matrix and Good Will Hunting, then it's likely that many will stick with Netflix rather than switching to Walmart's service.

  207. What about the info?? by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

    I've been doing Netflix for a few months and I love it. I love the website because I can search for an actor or director or a title or anything and gain access to pro reviews, customer ratings, etc. And it has actually started to make decent recommendations based on my rental history and ratings. And I love queueing up the movies and knowing that I have several months worth of viewing pleasure awaiting me.

    The only possible better scenario that I can see would be if amazon, via imdb.com, got into the rental business. Then they have *the* definitive online movie information source, complete with customer reviews, and the ultimate opportunity to cross-market tons of merchandise via their other online departments.

    This is exactly what the internet is good for, and I am really jazzed to see what happens when the competition heats up.

  208. Communities don't try to keep them out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "(and they *DO*--why the hell would communities try to keep them out, as you were so quick to point out?--Do you realize how fucking inconsistent you are?--"

    Communities don't try to keep them out. Sometimes government officials, pressured by business interests that are trying to prevent competition, keep Wal*Mart out, but as soon as Wal*Mart gets ready to open its doors, guess who is waiting there to get in? The community.

  209. Did the homework. I'm back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Go do some more homework and then get back to us on that. Wal-Mart has been getting sued right and left for abuses of their employees.""They're there because they're forced. Nothing else available because Wal-Mart used their predatory practices to get into these small towns and destroy what was already there. Get a brain."

    Predatory, as in providing a better value in a better store? No, that is competition. You forget the fact that the customers flock to the place whether or not there is competition around. No one is forced.

    If you don't like Wal*Mart, don't go there. But don't make up things to explain why so many people like it when you don't. Get a brain? Sorry, got one already. I used it to think past your lame-brain statements about things you know nothing about.

  210. net flex at Wal-mart by digtl88 · · Score: 1

    That sounds good to me I like the idea of a one stop shop being Walmart.

  211. Will it be located in the store? by digtl88 · · Score: 1

    Is walmart goin to have an online sight to order or will they figure out some way to do that in the store.