Slashdot Mirror


Sony's New Vaio PCG-TR1A: 12" Powerbook Killer?

Anonymous Howard writes "Sony has a hot new subnote on it's hand: the Vaio PCG-TR1A. This subnote is packed full of features: integrated camera (still and video), 10.6 inch bright wide-format screen, 900MHz Centrino, CD-RW/DVD Combo drive, 30GB drive, 802.11b, two usb ports, firewire, 3.11 pounds and a magnesium alloy case. The thing looks really cool. For me, it's the first subnote that actually gives me a viable option for purchase instead of a the Apple Powerbook 12". Read a article about it over at Designtechnica. Check out this forum thread that has good pics, other then the stock pics, next to a VPR Matrix 200A5."

452 comments

  1. 3.11 Lbs by jinglecat · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yes, Granted it is 3.11lbs, that is, until you attach an external device such as a dvd player or the like.

    With the powerbook, this is all included and still weighs less that these flimsy Sony machines.

    1. Re:3.11 Lbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      CD-RW/DVD combo drive

    2. Re:3.11 Lbs by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Informative

      yeah and on my 12 in PB, I get a DVD-RW/CD-RW

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:3.11 Lbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It comes with a DVD/CDRW player IN IT MAN.

      No need for anything external except a flppy drive.

    4. Re:3.11 Lbs by MoosePirate · · Score: 1

      Now in order to figure out it weighed 3 pounds, you had to read the sentence that says it comes with a built in DVD/CD-RW, so I really don't understand your point. And how did this get modded up? That many people don't even read the posting?

    5. Re:3.11 Lbs by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      How much is a pound, or whatever the arcane measuring unit Lbs signifies, in royal dutch kilograms?

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    6. Re:3.11 Lbs by X_Caffeine · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been carrying a Vaio Z505 for about three years now, and have never once been in a situation where I was away from home and needed the optical drive. I just don't install software when I'm working or surfing at a coffee shop.

      And flimsy? What, do you mean it's flexible or something? Sony shipped laptops with metal (magnesium alloy) frames long before the "tibook" came out.

      That said, I'll be picking up an iBook soon... but I sure wish they would shave a few pounds off it by leaving out the optical drive.

      --
      // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
    7. Re:3.11 Lbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps the pound unit should be measured as a fraction of the total weight of a US Tank ripping through the cobblestones of your quaint European village street.

    8. Re:3.11 Lbs by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      How much is a pound, or whatever the arcane measuring unit Lbs signifies,

      About 1/14th of a stone.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    9. Re:3.11 Lbs by PhiberOptix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      granted, moderators don't read the articles, but in this case it is because they're lazy AND because the link is slashdotted. Not just the first option. :P

    10. Re:3.11 Lbs by CausticWindow · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, I think it's closer to a very large multiple of the weight of all the Weapons Of Mass Destruction the US has uncovered in Iraq.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    11. Re:3.11 Lbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DVD-R on my Powerbook has come in handy a few times. It's very convenient to be able to burn a CD or a DVD for people anywhere, on the road.

    12. Re:3.11 Lbs by greentree · · Score: 1

      yeah, and you also get ripped off. a dvd-r that burns at 1x. 1x? 4.something gigs at 1x? the cd-r burns at 24x, which is perfectly reasonable. but in my opinion, paying some hundred dollars for a 1x dvd burner is sort of silly. you may be better off buying something external now or later on, which i see as a better investment than paying for the super drive.

    13. Re:3.11 Lbs by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      The x in 1x for a DVD-R stands for something different than the x in 24x. Jesus, do you really think that anybody would take eight hours to burn a DVD? Think before you post, please.

    14. Re:3.11 Lbs by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      Come on. It was a serious question. They stopped printing stoners to kilogram conversion tables here when we swapped stones for royal dutch kilograms back in, oh, 1740.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    15. Re:3.11 Lbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you get DVD-R, not DVD-RW (and CD-RW)

    16. Re:3.11 Lbs by greentree · · Score: 1

      so then 1x would put it just under one hour? that's not too bad i suppose.

    17. Re:3.11 Lbs by PurpleRabbit · · Score: 1

      "Two-and-a-quarter pounds of jam weigh about a kilogram."

      Repeat. In a sing-song style.

      --



      I'm on a whisky diet. I've lost three days already.
    18. Re:3.11 Lbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Get rid of the internal optical drives and make the laptop MORE portable!

    19. Re:3.11 Lbs by pHDNgell · · Score: 1

      I've been carrying a Vaio Z505 for about three years now, and have never once been in a situation where I was away from home and needed the optical drive. I just don't install software when I'm working or surfing at a coffee shop.

      I've needed to burn CDs or DVDs when I've been out before...not that I'm saying that making it optional would be entirely a bad idea or anything, but I pretty much spend all of my time one one of two powerbooks these days, and I find it nice to have everything inside.

      --
      -- The world is watching America, and America is watching TV.
    20. Re:3.11 Lbs by mindriot · · Score: 3, Informative

      1 pound = 453.59 g. Ergo, 3.11 pounds = 1.41 kg.

    21. Re:3.11 Lbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a 12", 3.11 lb powerbook killer. It even passes the "mom" test. Your mother loves it.

    22. Re:3.11 Lbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. Silly, actually it's the IQ of George Bush, plus the sum of the collective IQ's of 90% of the US public. The rough figure is just a tad under pi(3.14).

    23. Re:3.11 Lbs by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Yes, its about an hour. And even though I have a 4x, 1x media is so much cheaper right now that that's what I order.

    24. Re:3.11 Lbs by cosmo7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No need for anything external except a flppy drive.
      and a paper tape punch/reader while you're at it.

    25. Re:3.11 Lbs by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

      1 pound = $1.60 U.S., Ergo 3.11 pounds = $4.98

      Cheapest. Notebook. EVAR.

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    26. Re:3.11 Lbs by uunh+haun · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I use mine ALL of the time. Maybe that's because I have one.

  2. Dell has had one for some time too by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.dell.com/us/en/bsd/products/model_latit _latit_x200.htm. it's pretty nice, although i prefer the c400 myself. the x200 is just too small.

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by taeric · · Score: 1

      They only thing I did not like about the x200 was the abysmal battery life. If I remember correctly, it was just at 110 minutes. That is just not long enough. :(

      The new centrino offerings look nice, though.

    2. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by KevetS · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How can this be considered a PowerBook killer when it has no DVD-R option, and EXTERNAL DVD/CD-RW drives as the only possibility for burning cd's? Sure it looks small and light, but the 12" PowerBook has a hell of a lot crammed into it's small package, which is more than I can say for this Dell.

      --
      This is my United States of whatever.
    3. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      110 minutes? maybe burning cds back to back to back. i had one on for at least 3 hours, surfing over wireless

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    4. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1, Informative

      why would one buy an ultra-small laptop, only to then need a dvd burner or external drive? if i'm going to shell out $$ for an uber-small laptop, i want it as light as possible

      besides ... are there any actual valid uses for an optical disc reader these days?

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    5. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by taeric · · Score: 1

      Really!?!?! this greatly changes my outlook on those. The 110 minutes was from a review, but I can not remember the source. I remember thinking that that was worthless.

      Over 3 hours, eh? That pretty much puts this laptop back in contention for my future purchases. My only 2 real criteria are: 1. small. 2. long battery life.

    6. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about reading optical disks? (You know, those shiny things software and music sometimes come on.)

    7. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 2, Informative

      i have the x200 and don't think it's too small. i'm not a small guy (6'2"), and i find the keyboard comfortable. and it's much less painful to carry than my ti book.

    8. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ahh. now i remember. i had the 6 cell battery. without extra batteries, you get a 4 cell.

      for the c400, you can get a 16 cell battery, but it pretty much doubles the height and weight. =(

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    9. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      i'm 6'4". you're right, the keyboard is nice. there's something about the lid that makes it seem flimsy compared to the c400 though.

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    10. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      Extra storage, transferring files to or from someone who does not have high bandwidth, backups, installing software, music cds, video cds..

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    11. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by ewhac · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Sony has a higher resolution LCD panel (1280 * 768). The Dell's only 1024 * 768.

      Schwab

    12. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 6'6" and i'd just like to keep this thread going with increments of 2". Thank you.

      -Management.

    13. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by PetrusMagnusII · · Score: 1

      i have seen this new sony, and i dont like it.. it is way to thick, they keyboard is clumbsy as are the buttons for the tuch-pad.. i was thinking about picking one up until i saw it in person.. its way to expensive for what it doesnt do... sorry..
      (this is refering to the japanese model)

    14. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Moofie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, good thing Dell doesn't let the user determine their own needs. Gosh, that might be, like, confusing.

      Oh, wait, it's Macintoshes that are supposed to be feature-poor. Oh, wait, it's a Macintosh that's the benchmark for small laptops.

      The computer market is coming apart at the seams! All the stupid stereotypes are...gasp! Wrong!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    15. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      true. i haven't broken it yet, though. i can't say the same for the damn ti book though.

    16. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      they keyboard is clumbsy

      Are you using one now?

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    17. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear about and see more broken Dell laptops than every other brand of laptop combined.

    18. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      It's got a CD-RW/DVD built-in. Dynamism.com has the Japanese model, with DVD-R/CD-RW and BlueTooth built in.

      Still, it's not slot-loading...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    19. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is with you freaks? Don't you understand the purpose of a sub-note is to offer portability for business purposes? Technology is not yet such that a sub-note can be considered a desktop replacement. As such, there is NO POINT in cramming a DVD-R into a notebook! Since business entities are the largest buyers of notebooks (especially volume), companies will continue to put business interests first. Why you think you need a DVD-R in a notebook is beyond me.

      Furthermore, integrated 802.11b is subject to obsolence with time. If the hardware turns out to be crap, you're screwed unless you're rich, which is the main goal of notebook manufacturers!

      Also, with regards to business clients and optical drives -- use a USB drive! Odds are better at finding a USB port on any given computer at a site as opposed to an optical burner.

  3. 12 inch powerbook killer? by theWrkncacnter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see how it can be when it costs more. I purchased a 12 inch powerbook with a superdrive (DVR-R/CD-RW), 802.11g, firewire, 2 usb ports, 32mb nVivida gforce 4 and a bunch of other stuff for the same price as this thing, and the prices for the 12 inch pb have since gone down. I hardly see how its a "killer." Plus, I love how everyone plays catchup to apple. For such a small market share they sure do seem to set a lot of standards.

    --
    -1 (Troll) is antihammer
    1. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. Also, I think Mac OS X is a significant value addition.

    2. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by thefinite · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're right, Apple Computers taste horrible, despite all of the "lickability" people talk about. Still, they do look great and kick butt over any other laptop.

      (This post written from my sixth limb--a TiPB 667.)

      --
      Boom Shanka
    3. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree - no way in hell you can compare a 900 mhz centrino (which is nothing but a gimmick) against a 867mhz G4. Not to mention being able to burn DVD's on the powerbook, 802.11g, better graphics, a bigger screen, and the biggest thing of all - OS X 10.2 Jaguar, with the soon to be available OS X 10.3 Panther.

    4. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by markclong · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got a 1.6 Ghz Intel Pentium-M (centrino is a marketing gimmick. It is the chipset, processor, and wireless LAN module not the processor). The processor is as fast as a 2.4 Ghz Pentium chip in every benchmark I can run. Centrino may be a gimmick but the Pentium-M processor delivers real performance and allows for decent battery life too.

    5. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Still, they do look great and kick butt "

      Stop it.

      You're turning me (and ever other 15 year old geek) on.

    6. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad taste isn't one of those standards. Damn straight! When they called it a "Blueberry iMac" they were lying! It tastes like plastic!!!

    7. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by huntz0r · · Score: 2, Informative

      However, something worth mentioning is that the Sony is slightly smaller and significantly lighter than the 12" Powerbook (4.6 vs 3.1 lb, quite a difference proportionally). It may be close enough to compare with the Apple, but its design was targetted differently; it sacrifices some features and some value in trade for improved portability.

      With all portables, there is a tradeoff between cheap, light, and powerful. Pick two :)

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly affected when you come and go, you come and go)
    8. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I agree - no way in hell you can compare a 900 mhz centrino (which is nothing but a gimmick) against a 867mhz G4.
      Huh? The centrino at 900 mhz is easily on par with the G4 867. But I am baffled why they didn't use the centrino 1600.
    9. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by superspoon · · Score: 0, Redundant

      w00! I'm not alone!

      --


      YarrRrr
    10. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      I get moderated down as a troll for bringing up facts? I seriously don't see how it's trolling or flaming.

      Please visit compusa.com for the latest prices on the G5 and other series systems, then visit pricewatch.com and assemble a PC from parts.

      Show me where I am wrong.

      I detect overly zealous mac users here. You can't compare intel products to macs in the damn article and not have people voice facts on the issue in a forum.

      Thank you,
      Victor

    11. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 1

      Without getting into all of the Mac megahertz myth crap, about your second question...they probably used the slower centrino to improve battery life (and possibly result in a physically smaller chipset?).

    12. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by cioxx · · Score: 1

      12" PB has WiFi built-in? what?

      Last time I checked you had to purchase the card separately. WiFi is only included with 17", isn't it?

    13. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by pastafazou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes. Everyone plays catchup with Mac all the time. That's why Mac dominates the desktop market.
      Apple dominates the desktop publishing market. Apple and Avid dominate the pro-video editing market (and if you think Macs are overpriced, you won't believe what Avid charges). Apple is the single largest vendor of professional audio editing machines in the music business. The only market Apple doesn't have significant market share is in the low-end desktop market, which is used for word-processing, spreadsheets, and accounting software. Apple makes high-end machines with good margins to fuel their R&D. The low end of the desktop market is a cutthroat, bloody mess! Look at Compaq, Packard Bell, AST, NEC, and many others who lost their shirts. Dell is the only company doing well in it because they don't do the R&D thing.
      Not. They are too expensive and proprietary.
      Hmmm....I have an old 8500 with a PowerPC 604 CPU. I can upgrade this machine to a G3 or a G4. I also have an old Pentium II machine which can be upgraded to...a faster Pentium II, but not an AMD processor, nor a Pentium III or Pentium IV, because Intel's CPU slots are PROPRIETARY . Apple embraces more open standards than Microsoft or Intel. As far as the price, I think I get my money's worth and more from the various Macs I've owned. If price is the only consideration you have when purchasing, then you should be blasting Intel, praising AMD, blasting Windows, and praising OSS.
      Just because they have a few innovative products doesn't mean they are the benchmark.
      Apparently they are, since this article was about Sony's new 12" Powerbook Killer. There's quite a few articles that get posted about company X's 17" Powerbook killer or company Y's all-in-one like an iMac but it's Wintel blah blah blah.
      I cite the G5 as a neat system, but not innovative in the current market.
      Yeah, 'cause everyone is using a 64-bit CPU that's backwards compatible with 32-bit software, 1GHz frontside bus, PCI-X expansion slots, Firewire 800, Gigabit Ethernet, High-speed Wireless, and 16GB/s of bandwidth between the CPU's and the system controller.
      I do consider the iPod innovative, as well as most of their laptop's designs.
      Might as well mention the iMac, since it won so many design awards for being innovative. So, let's see...that's the laptops, the iPod, the iMac, and maybe, just maybe, the G5 desktop. Which is their entire product line.
      Look at processor speeds on desktop systems over the past few years. It's already a rather foggy memory the last time I looked at a Mac's specs and thought 'wow, the PC market really needs to play some catchup!'. The last one I was impressed with were the PowerPC clones, actually. They moved pretty quick compared to PC's of the same price. But that was like '94 or '95..
      This is total crap. The G3 kicked the Wintel machines butts. The G4 was where the PC world finally caught up. On launch, the G4 kicked the P3's that were shipping at the time. But Motorola was unable to deliver the speed bumps to keep up, and then the P4 was out and the G4 was left behind. The G4's vector processing engine is still far superior to anything Intel has, which is why it's been used for so many Blast implementations.
      In the case of laptops, I agree in this particular case, but as for other configurations forget it. For the price of a new G5 I could have a monster of a PC that would make the G5 look like last year's PC except for the pretty case that matches a cinema display. Is that worth the extra money? Nah, I'll stick with Lian Li cases for now.
      Maybe you should do a little more reading. The high end G5 beats the best PC you can build right now with dual Xeon CPU's, and by the time you add all the features the G5 has, the price comes out to within a couple of hundred bucks of the G5. Plus you get OS X. Plus the G5 is much quieter than a dual-CPU PC.
      Yeah, you can get a G5 with dual CPU's.. Whoopee. For that

    14. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by David+Rolfe · · Score: 3, Informative
      I have to agree... if it can't burn DVD's it's not in the same class.

      To quote ars technica, "...[burning dvds] isn't just a luxury, it's a requirement" ;-)

      The 12" with DVD-R is $1,799.00 (and includes right off store.apple.com: 12.1-inch TFT Display 1024x768 resolution, 867MHz PowerPC G4, 256MB DDR266 SDRAM, 40GB Ultra ATA/100, SuperDrive, NVIDIA GeForce4 420 Go 32MB DDR video memory, 10/100BASE-T Ethernet, FireWire 400, Bluetooth built-in, VGA & S-Video out)

      So compared to the Sony, you spend a 1.5 pounds more in weight to get ability to burn dvds, bigger display, bigger harddrive, more ram, os x, and with the difference in price you could buy an iSight and ... gasp take stills and video. The review of the Sony puts battery life between 2.5 to 7 hours ... the Powerbook is like 3 to 5 hours.

      I guess what it comes down to is that if you are willing to pay more, you can look at a smaller screen and video conference for two extra hours (assuming the camera and iLink aren't what drags that battery down to the 2.5 hour mark)

      I'm not sold on the editorial stance 'Powerbook Killer'. :-\

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    15. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by slantyyz · · Score: 1

      Every point and counterpoint for and against Mac mentioned in your post has been put forth hundreds of times here on slashdot.

      Do you really think you're doing Mac users (or /. users, for that matter) a service with your overlong, insecure and defensive (and somewhat redundant) rebuttal? You're just galvanizing the opinion held by many that while Macs are cool, die-hard Mac users are not.

      I like and respect Apple and their products, but every time I see a post like that, I feel like bashing Apple, Mac and all of the faithful.

      There is more to who you are than the computer you own. Go outside and enjoy some sunshine.

    16. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by NitroPye · · Score: 1

      Your TiBook is your 6th limb as well I see. Well what is being overlooked here is the software, I am a firm believer that the best o/s for a laptop is mac osx, and I am a very very very large linux advocate.

    17. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by idsofmarch · · Score: 1

      "If I was a latte sipping, femine male..." I'm so sick of this shit, I buy Windows therefore I must be masculine, but mac users are so teh gay. They sip lattes, but I drink coffee. Shut up you simping fool, at least have the courage to go beyond simple and rediculous stereotypes! And as for the unique box, I just have to say ooohhh...neon. Wow! I'm so unique. Ooops! Someone get a fire-extinguisher. ;)

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    18. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      It's a BTO option, with an internal antenna. Set you back about $100.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    19. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by bigfatlamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sold on the editorial stance 'Powerbook Killer'

      Absolutely. Why not just say that it's finally some competition for the 12" PB as opposed to a PB Killer? As with all things, you make trade-offs buying one over the other.

      One thing the Vaio does have going for it is that it's more complete than any other Wintel notebook of it's size. You can get a number of other subnotebooks with decent sized screens, WiFi, etc., but they require external (USB in most cases) optical drives. Doubles the weight and decreases the portability dramatically.

      If I was looking for a Wintel notebook, this, in spite of being dramatically underpowered, esp. compared to the PB, I'd probably go with this Vaio. At the very least, it's the least ugly Wintel notebook out there.

      BFL

      --
      There's one thing computing teaches you, and that's that there's no point to remembering everything.
      --Doug Copland
    20. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by dootbran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >I also have an old Pentium II machine which can be upgraded to...a faster Pentium II, but not an AMD processor, nor a Pentium III or Pentium IV, because Intel's CPU slots are PROPRIETARY.

      BULLSHIT. You can drop in your choice of P II, P III, or C3 processor. If your motherboard is simply too crappy, well, it's not my fault you invested in PC Chips junk.

      Thats kinda harsh, I mean excuse me for not knowing that intel was 18 months from bringing out the P3 with a 100mhrfz fsb when I picked up my p2 233 back in the day. let alone the 133 mghfs bus 3 years down the line. I know that your all knowing magic hat told you what kind of upgrades where in the pipeline but not all of us can be so enlightened.

      And, more bullshit, yes, you can upgrade even your 486 motherboard to a P IV. It's called a PCI slot motherboard, and it's the same bullshit "upgrade" that Apple is feeding you. Except they pretend it's a good idea. It isn't.

      Actually apple doesn't feed any upgrades, at all! No cdr or dvdr upgrades ever. They do have easy access ram and sometimes HDD or PCI/AGP but as far as I know go they don't really handle CPU upgrades.

      Demand is the reason for this, not stupid Apple R&D. They are apparently good enough for some consumers. A new Mac is kinda expensive.

      >Apple embraces more open standards than Microsoft or Intel.

      LOL! Show me some Jaguar source code! Why did it take so long to get the iPod working on windows? Why did Apple put Appletalk on your old Mac? Why are all firewire ports I've seen called i.Link, S-400, or IEEE1394?

      First off, standards are not really equal to open source. Crap, the guy wasn't even mentioning oss in his argument, it says Microsoft, maybe you missed it because it was spelled wrong. I've been reading slashdot for a while and I guess that they changed their name to Micro$oft now. That is how everyone is writing it now...

      And who the hell knows why ieee1394 has seventeen different names. Pisses me off too, but it is part of a standard so I don't really see what the point is, at least the stuff is compatible even if its a tad confusing.

      >Apparently they are, since this article was about Sony's new 12" Powerbook Killer.

      Oh yeah, that 12" powerbook. It's so innovative to squeeze a bunch of high-tech into a small box!

      Yeah, uh.. this is way out of context. He actually said something more along the lines of the powerbooks being the benchmark for laptops, benchmarks aren't necessarily innovative they just kick ass.

      Look, if you want innovative, look at Gateway's Handbook. Now THAT'S innovative. Heck, I remember those being made back some time around '92 with 286 processors! Apple just dusted off some history books.

      And this is of course totally relevant because not only are Gateway computers totally sweet today but this particular model is so freaking awesome that kids are paying outrageous amounts of money on ebay for them. I'm sure some more patient individual could scape up even more innovative pieces of hardware from apple's past that would be a total indication of the companies total domination of the entire world today.

      >The G3 kicked the Wintel machines butts.

      Did it? Dollar for Dollar? MIPS to MIPS?

      Or was it just in specially optimized applications?

      This is just stupid, what the hell do you buy a computer for; to not run applications?? I know that my ibook was actually purchased for the reason of doing continual benchmarks and watching the result. Or maybe I just wanted to be able to browse the web, on an application written for my computer.

      Who cares if the performance of an real world application is a result of optimization. It may make yo

    21. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by gunnk · · Score: 1

      WiFi is built-in on the Superdrive models (some 15" and all 17"). The combo drive models (12" and some 15") have it as an option. My 15" PowerBook from November had it built-in (again, the Superdrive model).

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    22. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad your other hand is wrapped firmly around your stunted 5th limb. But I guess it is easy to clean that apple screen. They sure know their users.

    23. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by I_M_Noman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      To quote ars technica, "...[burning dvds] isn't just a luxury, it's a requirement" ;-)
      I must be a complete troglodyte, because I don't have a need to burn DVDs. Neither do any of my friends or colleagues. There is the occasional CD backup of a recorded Centra session, but that's done in the studio on a beefy workstation. And watching movies on a laptop? Not so much.

      Am I the only person left who only uses his laptop as a computer instead of as a home entertainment center? (Not flamebait, but a genuine question.)
    24. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not, but with that kind of attitude is sounds you're in the upswinging majority of laptop users who don't perform any kind of backup. Without 4.75GB of writable removable media, you're unlikely to be backing up any reasonable amount of data any time soon.

      Beefy workstation for a CD burn? Must be a Microsoft shop. Bloatware, thy author is Bill.

    25. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were moderated down as a troll because you're comparing a homebrew PC against a 1st tier manfacturer's PC. I'd moderate you as a troll if you did the same damn thing in a discussion about any other 1st tier manufacturer.

      Get it through your head, trollboy: THEY ARE NOT THE SAME.

      They are not built out of the same parts. Your cheap-ass PC is made from components that will fail within a year, maybe two. If you switch to using quality components, the price different becomes neglible.

      You have no support. Have a problem with your system? Who you gonna call? Microsoft wants serious bucks to talk to your cheap ass. So does everyone else. Money that you "saved" will now be spent on support. See Point #1, longevity.

      You have diverse and varying warranties. Particularly if you skimp out on your cheap PC and buy OEM components, which typically only come with 90 day STORE warranties. And since you're buying from pricewatch.com, chock full of merchants who won't even fulfill your order, much less replace defective merchandise, you're bound to have some serious fun there. Time is money. Downtime is lost/wasted money. And you'd better keep receipts for every single component so you can prove that it didn't fail on Day 91.

      You have spent zero effort on determining interoperability issues. I realize this is a shocking notion to a build-your-own-PC zealot like yourself, but not every IDE drive works the same way. Not every PCI controller works the same way. And so on. Some hardware just plain doesn't work with other hardware. You will spent weeks solving this crap. Trust me. I've been there.

      Do I need to keep going? I have over a decade of experience building homebrews, and while I'm unlikely to buy a PC from any 1st tier manufacturer any time soon, I certainly don't believe them to be the same thing.

      Nothing in life is free. NOTHING. Everything comes with a pricetag attached. It's just up to you to find it.

    26. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to agree with the other, even after adding WiFi and other stuff the 12" powerbook is still cheaper and has more functionality, even if it is slightly larger/heavier.

      One nice thing about this Vaio though, is that its the first that apparently includes an optical drive of some sort. IIRC the others were all a $500 external optional purchase.

      In any event in a subnotebook that small, I think I'd spend my time looking at something more like a tabletpc. Hell, I'd probably look at them as notebook/PDA killers period if their horsepower and price were a little closer to that of comparable notebooks. Maybe in a few years, and hopefully apple will release a Power970 based version with Newton features + OSX, or a *BSD/*Linux based one, but I haven't seen any connected component pseudorealtime HWR sw on linux that can recognize anything other than a non-connected simplified alphabet.

    27. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, don't forget customer service. Having just dealt with Sony, I can only assume that their idea of service is getting you to just shut up and buy a replacement.

    28. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by rwhamann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Notebook backup to CD's or DVD's? I've never been enamored of backup's that require multiple peices of media. My notebok backup solution is my 20gb Archos, enough space to back up my 10gb notebook drive. Having said this, I'd still want the Powerbook over the VAIO, but for OS X, not the Superdrive.

      --
      seg fault
    29. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      Probably not, but with that kind of attitude is sounds you're in the upswinging majority of laptop users who don't perform any kind of backup. Without 4.75GB of writable removable media, you're unlikely to be backing up any reasonable amount of data any time soon.
      Who said I don't back up data? All work-related data on my ThinkPad is stored on the network. Anything I do while undocked is automatically backed up there by a login script when I get back to the office. As for home stuff, I don't keep that much data that I can't .zip it and copy up to a floppy or two, or even a Zip drive.

      As for the Centra recordings, they're .AVI or occasionally .WMV) files. Yep, we're a Microsoft shop, but the recordings tend to be long. Hence the faster desktop workstation. (Otherwise I'd be in the office all night.)
    30. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pentium-Ms come with 1mb cache, which may explain the speed bump when running a typical laptop setup, ie, very few apps running at the same time.

    31. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by poboxbrian · · Score: 1

      The reason they didn't use the 1.6 is the voltage level. The 900 is even a lower voltage than the regular centrino. That's why you get 6.5 hours from a unit that weighs 3.3 lbs.

    32. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

      I've got to agree with you. The only laptop I own is a TiBook, and frankly I would prefer that it had no internal optical drive, or at least the ablility to replace said drive with an extra battery. There's no reason to hobble battery life on a portable computer when the need for an optical drive of any sort can be filled via firewire, USB, or ethernet/WiFi (a la NFS). As much as I like Ars Technica, their claim that DVD burning is a requirement (on a portable no less!) is ridiculous.

    33. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1
      "The G4's vector processing engine is still far superior to anything Intel has, which is why it's been used for so many Blast implementations."

      It's used for so many Blast implementations because it's well suited for Blast. That doesn't make Altivec "far superior to anything Intel has". One might as well lambast Motorola for their crappy implementation of SSE2. Besides, Blast isn't the only computationally intensive programming task out there. It wouldn't kill you to give the G4 some props without re-mouthing Apple's marketing line. Why not give us some goodies about G4 vs P4 performance at CFD, for example? If it's as flat out superior as you claim it to be the proof shouldn't be too hard to find.

      The high end G5 beats the best PC you can build right now with dual Xeon CPU's

      Well, according to the benchmarks done at NASA the G5's performance is equivalent to the performance one could get from the best P4 available in November 2002. So I would say your claim is up for some dispute. Is it really so hard to just plain like the computer you want without needing to believe it's the "best"?

    34. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1
      Only thing I've used a dvd burner for is backing 4.7gb worth of stuff.


      I'd like to make dvd's out of my wedding videos and turn some of my other vhs stuff into dvd's as well... for convenience really. I don't have a "need".

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    35. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1
      Haha, the ars comment was in jest regarding the God Box.

      I didn't intend to imply everyone needed to be making dvd's on their laptops ... but really, if a laptop is the only new computer you can afford, may as well enjoy the bells and whistles, right?

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    36. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I like and respect Apple and their products, but every time I see a post like that, I feel like bashing Apple, Mac and all of the faithful.


      No more so that the biased, ill-informed crap ("latte sipping feminine male") that was the parent post. And that started it, too.

      BTW, it's well scored for a "somewhat redundant" post (though not mine)
  4. Interesting... by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting that Apple's notebooks (and mp3 player) are now the standard others are compared against. A big shift since the 90s...

    1. Re:Interesting... by SN74S181 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's something that I don't understand.

      Unless you've bought into Apple's desktop systems, buying an Apple notebook means having to maintain two seperate sets of software to run on your systems.

      I look at the Powerbook and shake my head because I have too much fairly good and rather expensive Windows software. If I'm going to run a second software platform (which I do) I want it to be a free software platform. I'm not interested in investing lots of money in applications for yet another properietary OS.

      I guess if I had an unlimited amount of money to spend, the Powerbook would be worth considering. But then if I had an unlimited amount of money I would get an IBM PPC based laptop to run AIX and/or NetBSD on.

    2. Re:Interesting... by neuroklinik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I'm not interested in investing lots of money in applications for yet another properietary OS."

      Hmm... Open-source Darwin core... X11... More "open" technologies than you could shake a stick at... Loads of great built-in languages... Freely available ports of tons of great Unix apps... Exactly what is so "proprietary" about Mac OS X that is scaring you away?

    3. Re:Interesting... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If it's the cost of software keeping you back, I have to ask... why? If you play by the rules, you'll (generally, according to most licenses I've seen, anyway) have to buy separate copies of your existing apps for the laptop anyway; if you don't play by the rules, and duplicate the ones from your desktop to use on the laptop, you could just warez the Mac versions as well. Either way you'll probably wind up paying about the same for your laptop's apps regardless of platform. Just a thought...

      (I do of course realize, though, this doesn't apply if you play by the rules and also get those essential apps bundled with the machine on one platform but not the other, and it also doesn't apply if the apps you want/need aren't made for the Mac and there are no equivalents that can open & save the same files.)

    4. Re:Interesting... by Sillypuddy · · Score: 1

      I am a long time VB/C# developer and have recently moved to the iBook because I wanted something I actually enjoy using. Out of the box it has all the software you need. You general can download open source equals of whatever you need. Your point about lack of software or duplicated software is a moot point at best.

    5. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am a long time VB/C# developer

      I can see no reason why you would admit such a horrible thing unless you are a masochist looking to get laughed at and flamed by the slashbot hordes.

      What does being a VB/C# developer have to do with anything else in your post anyways??

    6. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Out of the box it has all the software you need"

      Except VB and C#!

    7. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cocoa? Carbon? Aqua? Quartz?

    8. Re:Interesting... by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      Interesting that Apple's notebooks (and mp3 player) are now the standard others are compared against.

      I think that has more to do with the slow pace at which Apple rolls out new models than any kind of technical issues. As a result, every one of Apple's handful of laptops receives much more exposure and marketing dollars than any other model.

      Don't get me wrong: the 12" Powerbook is pretty nice hardware, but there has been plenty of really nice hardware in the PC world as well. And the Sony beats thes 12" Powerbook hands-down in pretty much every area as far as I'm concerned.

    9. Re:Interesting... by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly what is so "proprietary" about Mac OS X that is scaring you away?

      Well, the audio and video APIs, for example, which are still based on Cocoa and are a pain to use. And the Mac doesn't use an X11 desktop, it only runs X11 apps under Aqua, so X11 apps don't have good desktop integration. And OS X graphics isn't exactly fast. And on and on.

      Overall, I have found that OS X is usable as a sort-of UNIX laptop, but less than ideal. Get one if you need to run OS X apps. If all applications you want to run are Linux/UNIX apps, an x86 laptop running Linux is cheaper, faster, and easier to install and maintain.

    10. Re:Interesting... by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess if I had an unlimited amount of money to spend, the Powerbook would be worth considering. But then if I had an unlimited amount of money I would get an IBM PPC based laptop to run AIX and/or NetBSD on.

      If I had an unlimited amount of money I would be too busy being fed grapes by supermodels on my 500 foot yacht to worry about laptops.

    11. Re:Interesting... by SN74S181 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly what is so "proprietary" about Mac OS X that is scaring you away?

      It should be fairly obvious, but people seem to not notice.

      Mac OS X only runs on a single source of hardware. That makes it extremely proprietary.

    12. Re:Interesting... by Laur · · Score: 2, Informative
      +5 Insightful? Sheesh.

      Open-source Darwin core

      Darwin may be open, but it isn't free. It's licensed under the Apple Public License, which is NOT a free license.

      X11

      Okay, what about X11. OS X doesn't run on X11, it runs on Aqua and Quartz, which are both very much closed source and proprietary. Yes, there are X servers for OS X. Yes, there are X servers for Windows and virtually every other desktop OS that I know of. What exactly was your point?

      More "open" technologies than you could shake a stick at

      What are you referring too? BSD userland? Apps? Just because the userland and apps are free doesn't mean the underlying OS is. Cygwin works great on Windows.

      Loads of great built-in languages.

      See my comment about userland stuff and apps. Do these languages not work on Windows?

      Freely available ports of tons of great Unix apps

      Again, just because the apps are free doesn't mean the underlying OS is. Cygwin contains ports of tons of great Unix apps, others have been ported to Windows natively, doesn't make Windows any less proprietary. Free software also runs great on lots of other proprietary Unixes (AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Irix, etc.), Mac OS X isn't much different in this respect.

      Exactly what is so "proprietary" about Mac OS X that is scaring you away?

      Now don't get me wrong, I love how Apple is using and working with the open source world. However, Mac OS X is NOT a free OS, it is very much proprietary. Can you download and build Mac OS X from source? Can you play and tweak with the source, or port it to other architectures? Is there even a way to put Aqua and Quartz on top of an OpenDarwin core? Can you avoid the expensive OS upgrades to gain necessary functionality (most apps, like Safari and Apple's X server won't run on anything less than 10.2)? There's nothing inherently wrong with proprietary OS's, just don't try to pretend that OS X isn't one.

      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
    13. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Darwin may be open, but it isn't free. It's licensed under the Apple Public License, which is NOT a free license.

      Hmm, I didn't pay one red cent for Darwin, including source code and all. Looks free to me...
    14. Re:Interesting... by Laur · · Score: 1
      Hmm, I didn't pay one red cent for Darwin, including source code and all. Looks free to me...

      Giving you a great benenfit of doubt that you are not just trolling, here's a link where you can learn the difference between "free as in speech" and "free as in beer." While one may not be important to you, you should at least know the difference (and understand what is meant by "free" software).

      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
    15. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? two sets of software? Debian runs just lovely on both :P

    16. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easier to install/maintain?

      What f*&^%in planet are you from?

      Ever done an OSX install? On my 1Ghz PB it takes about 15 minutes, start to finish.... that's including the extras (iDVD and Developer Tools discs).

      I've had Linux/FreeBSD installs take *DAYS* due to driver issues, etc.

      My uptime was 6 MONTHS until I installed the latest security update and it required a restart. And yes, this machine is on 24/7 (does SETI at night w/ screen/hd off).

      It is HARDLY more difficult to maintain. Regular Apple updates that install painlessly keep things running great. Say that for a Linux distro?

    17. Re:Interesting... by pyite · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I just ordered a 15" Powerbook and have never myself owned a non x86 machine (although I'm typing this on my mom's iBook). I suppose if you have invested money into Windows software, then it might be a problem. However, this is one area where its undeniably better to be a strictly Linux (as in my case) or BSD user. Debian runs on my workstations, Debian runs on my servers, and guess what will be running on my Powerbook. Debian PPC. I can run everything without skipping a beat. It's really up to you if you want to be tied down to a certain platform. I don't. As such, I choose my operating system accordingly.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    18. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were talking about the Apps, now the OS. The fact of the matter is that Apple has a huge open source set of apps that can do anything you could ever need. It is based on BSD Unix and almost every important and useful Unix/Linux app runs on it. Including OpenOffice to replace MS Office. Or, if you want the MS product run MS Office X it is superior to Windows version in many ways.

      OS X even comes standard with Apache, a premiere webserver; MySQL an awesome database system; and PHP a leading application scripting language. It integrates very well with Unix and WIndows networks. It has the best digital media system (iMovie, iTunes, iPhoto, iDvd). It comes with a complete POP and IMAP Mail client with the best spam filter built in (beysian filter). It comes with a well integrated address book and an awesome calendaring system. It's Safari browser is the fastest among all systems, includes pop-up browsing and is very standards compliant. It has a full blown GUI development environment with both C and real standards based Java as peers. It includes one of the based frameworks which was borne out of NeXT's critically acclaimed environment. And, it can run 98% of all your Windows app with the right software emulator.

      It has virtually no security issues, doesn't crash and is reliable as any other Unix enterprise system. It is regularly updated every 12-18 months with new version of the OS that continues to refine and add new features and apps to the core system. And now it has the backing and muscle of IBM behind it. Not to mention SUN, Oracle and Sybase, and even Microsoft.

      O by the way it runs on processors from both Motorola and IBM.

      No one is asking you to buy in, but you should at least show some respect for the work that is going into this system. If only Microsoft showed this much attention to WIndows and their customers.

    19. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything you said equally applies to any other platform that you don't already have. I don't see X-Box owners complaining that they can't play PS2 games on their system.

      You're just a whiny, pissy fuck.

    20. Re:Interesting... by Adrian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I've been a unix guy for about 15 years, and a mac and unix person for about 10 years.

      The nice thing about Mac OS X is I get to be both on the same machine. If you have a piece of Linux/FreeBSD code you can almost certainly run it on Mac OS X.

      While Mac OS X isn't a free OS - it is a *very* good free software platform (and there is also VirtualPC if you need to run some legacy Windows software - slowly :-)

    21. Re:Interesting... by p00ya · · Score: 1

      And the Mac doesn't use an X11 desktop...
      I'm afraid already!

      it only runs X11 apps under Aqua, so X11 apps don't have good desktop integration .. unlike 'X11 apps' on linux, which don't have any desktop integration at all. Oh, sorry, by 'X11 apps' did you mean KDE?

      And OS X graphics isn't exactly fast. And on and on. .. because the 5 second delay while my xterm redraws after I drag a window in front of it on XFree86 is so amazingly fast compared to OS X which has minimal redraw latency even with transparent windows .

      an x86 laptop running Linux is cheaper, faster, and easier to install and maintain.
      How exactly is "Linux" easier to install and maintain? Portage is available for OS X - the exact same package management system for a popular desktop distro. If a (linux) package you want isn't ported yet, you can always just try the old ./configure && make yourself. Ohhhhh so hard compared to say.. LFS.

      After having built a fully optimized gentoo system (2.4.21-ck3, XFree86 4, fluxbox) for my Athlon XP 2000+, I was bitterly disappointed to note the above noted redraw lag. IM(NS)HO, OS X desktop interactivity is faster.

      I'll concede the "cheaper" bit.

      In any case, I think most people will find that all the applications that they could possibly miss (usual POSIX console utilities and emacs) are there, along with some much improved ones (xchat) and a whole new plethora of cocoa apps - that perhaps they didn't know they wanted ;)

    22. Re:Interesting... by Sherloqq · · Score: 1

      Mac OS X only runs on a single source of hardware. That makes it extremely proprietary.

      Just a moment ago you were talking about having invested so much of your money in software, and as soon as someone points out open source software, you change your tune to hardware?

      C'mon...

      Bottom line is, for less money you get a better tool: the hardware is more robust than the competition mentioned here; features included (802.11b, ethernet, firewire etc.) are supported by the OS out of the box (unless I'm missing something here?); OS X means you're free to use almost anything that compiles on Unix/Linux/SCO ( :) ); and fer cryin' out loud, it's a laptop -- the hardware it's made of is already supported by the OS, and because of its nature, not because it's extremely proprietary, you're not likely to upgrade anything other than the hard drive (which you're free to do).

      I fail to understand your gripe here. Hardware shmardware. Your "significant investment in software" argument was much more convincing. IMO, the PowerBook is a much better deal from the hardware-to-price perspective. Now, if I could only find spare $1399...

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
    23. Re:Interesting... by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      because the 5 second delay while my xterm redraws after I drag a window in front of it on XFree86 is so amazingly fast compared to OS X

      That's nonsense; xterm redraws have been imperceptible on regular hardware for years.

      OS X which has minimal redraw latency even with transparent windows

      Yes, it does, by shoving graphics content into the server. But that's not drawing speed, that's redrawing speed. You can tell X11 to do the same thing, it just happens to be disabled by default because it's pointless on a properly configured system.

      How exactly is "Linux" easier to install and maintain? Portage is available for OS X - the exact same package management system for a popular desktop distro.

      The problem is that OS X package management isn't consistent: some applications are updated by Apple, others are updated by hand, yet others have their own built-in update systems, and then there are several ported Linux and BSD package managers. The upshot is that maintaining an OS X system requires a lot of manual work, while Linux systems update themselves completely automatically and consistently.

      In any case, I think most people will find that all the applications that they could possibly miss (usual POSIX console utilities and emacs) are there, along with some much improved ones (xchat) and a whole new plethora of cocoa apps - that perhaps they didn't know they wanted ;)

      There is a lot of UNIX/Linux software that doesn't work on OS X and is a pain to port. Problems are non-UNIX implementations of audio, video, I/O, and just general differences in header files and libraries.

      After having built a fully optimized gentoo system (2.4.21-ck3, XFree86 4, fluxbox) for my Athlon XP 2000+, I was bitterly disappointed to note the above noted redraw lag. IM(NS)HO, OS X desktop interactivity is faster.

      You are probably using an unaccelerated video driver or have some other configuration problem. You can't blame Linux for that. If you want good performance with no hassles, buy a system that comes with Linux support out of the box.

    24. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ever done an OSX install?

      Yes, lots, unfortunately.

      On my 1Ghz PB it takes about 15 minutes, start to finish.... that's including the extras (iDVD and Developer Tools discs).

      Yeah, and that is then followed by manually installing each application, then downloading system upgrades, then updating each application, then installing Fink, then telling Fink to install lots of stuff, and on and on.

      Regular Apple updates that install painlessly keep things running great.

      Regular Apple updates only update Apple's software. Non-Apple software requires a wide variety of other mechanisms.

      Say that for a Linux distro?

      You bet: Linux distros update everything automatically and with no intervention. It's far easier.

    25. Re:Interesting... by Sillypuddy · · Score: 1

      The reasoning is that I had been tied (or in your chain of thought "trapped") in the microsoft OS world because I need to use their development tools (Visual Studio.NET). At work I have to use MS stuff, but at home I have a choice and I brought the ibook. I have not looked back since.

      most \. lurkers are afraid to admit they use MS products, but I don't becuase it's the truth and it pays the bills.

    26. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virtual PC

    27. Re:Interesting... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I think the parent is referring to some rather expensive commercial Windows software, not the OS. Perhaps MS Office, Photoshop, or other expensize packages he would have to repurchase if he got a Mac.

      Though technically, according to the EULA he couldn't install most of those packages on more than one computer, so if he bought a Windows laptop and installed all of his desktop software on it he would be a software pirate (harrr).

      So if he wants to stay legit, it really wouldn't matter what he got, assuming the software he runs is available for the Mac.

    28. Re:Interesting... by Physics+Nobody · · Score: 1

      "Unless you've bought into Apple's desktop systems, buying an Apple notebook means having to maintain two seperate sets of software to run on your systems."

      Hmm...nope. Debian Linux running on both my custom x86 desktop and my iBook. Funny how that works out.

      --

      Physics is good

    29. Re:Interesting... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Okay, where can I buy my Apple laptop without Mac OS X? Last I heard, that particular piece of software was considered proprietary, open roots notwithstanding.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    30. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha. The AC poster is just a common troll, but whoever wasted a mod point on this is a major tool. Ha ha!

    31. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh christ, we've got someone who thinks fsf.org is a useful reference.

      Why not go move back to the commune and save us the exquisite joy of listening to you rant about how the world is imperfect, hippie?

  5. Power comparison by Millyways · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A 900 MHZ Centrino really doesn't compare that well to a 987MHZ G4.

    1. Re:Power comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, which do you figure would perform better?

    2. Re:Power comparison by uunh+haun · · Score: 2, Informative

      that's 867

  6. Battery Life. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 3, Interesting
    extra long battery life, estimated at 2.5 - 7 hours

    That's a pretty wide range...

    1. Re:Battery Life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not in the opinions of %5 - %90 of its potential customers.

    2. Re:Battery Life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      2.5 if the laptop is on.

      7.0 if it's off.

    3. Re:Battery Life. by vidnet · · Score: 5, Funny

      They should never have put in that red "Off"-light.

    4. Re:Battery Life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But we used a "Power efficent" 25 Watt bulb.

    5. Re:Battery Life. by sean23007 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      2.5 if you're using it. 7 if you're not. Pretty simple, really. ;)

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    6. Re:Battery Life. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      yeah...see, when it is actively being use, it is 2.5.....when it is in sleep mode, it is 7!!!

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:Battery Life. by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      I have several pieces of electronics equipment in my room with a red off light. Why?? (none of them run on batteries though) If there are no lights on, I can tell that it's off, go figure.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    8. Re:Battery Life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine a range of notebook uses that punish
      the battery. Can't you? You should read this as
      2.5 hours in a worst case, and up to 7 hours if
      you use few resources.

      What happened in your life that you lost the ability
      to think creatively? Do you expect all variances to
      be within a quarter sigma of each other? What
      mind crushingly boring life do you lead that prevents
      you from thinking critically about this range of numbers?

    9. Re:Battery Life. by kilauea · · Score: 1

      The best post to slashdot I've seen in 2 years.
      Bravo!

  7. nope by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 3, Informative
    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  8. Does it run Mac OS X ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Or can ya just stick an Apple sticker on it and then attract lots of friends?

  9. 900MHz Centrino by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sony used to use Transmeta chips in their subnotebooks. This can't be good news for TMTA. It's good that Linus could read the writing on the wall, but I feel bad for their other employees... facing unemployment in this economy. And, let's be honest, even if they do find work elsewhere, few companies have as much potential as Transmeta had.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:900MHz Centrino by dnaboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Potential, true, but Transmeta was doomed long ago. With StrongARM processers in PocketPCs which run faster than the original Celerons (400MhZ Pocket PCs vs 300 on my old POS Compuke), way higher speed current generation celerons, and Centrino as a way of marketing a chip / board / etc combination, Intel pretty much has the low through high end (along with AMD) of the market covered.

      I know someone, had I not mentioned it, would instantly pipe in that all MhZs are not created equal (I'm a Mac nut- trust me I know), but I'm merely trying to say that there really is no niche for Transmeta anymore.

      Once again from your intellectual, moral, social, and emotional superior,

    2. Re:900MHz Centrino by nomadic · · Score: 1

      but I'm merely trying to say that there really is no niche for Transmeta anymore.

      There never really was. The lowered power use just wasn't worth the weaker performance.

    3. Re:900MHz Centrino by Zandall · · Score: 1

      And don't forget Via with the Nehemiah 10000`1.0 GHz and the new 1.2Ghz (mere 12W during high computation tasks - 100% CPU utilization)

    4. Re:900MHz Centrino by v0rteXX · · Score: 1

      Actually for this class (the TR series replaces the SR series... you're thinking of the discontinued CR series) of subnotebook Sony has always used the Intel pseudopower saving Mobile Pentium which really heats up on various models ( my SR31K especially).

    5. Re:900MHz Centrino by antoinjapan · · Score: 1

      In my compamy here in japan they lease desktop computers for three years. The next ones they'll lease when the current ones run out have the option of one running transmeta chips (They are two desktop options and two laptop options, the lightest laptop is a transmeta one).

  10. OSX On Sony? by evil_roy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hard to believe. It's going to be hard to be a PowerBook killer without it.

    1. Re:OSX On Sony? by SN74S181 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, for lots of us, (one could say 'for the rest of us') OSX is the Powerbook killer. It might be a cool OS platform, but since all our Adobe apps, etc. are the Windows versions, etc. etc. the fact that the Powerbook only runs OSX kills it as an option. Where binary OS lockin is concerned, why switch from one lockin (Windows) to another (OSX)?

    2. Re:OSX On Sony? by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Because you get OpenStep development tools and API on OS X? GNUstep is cool too, but it's nice to have the NeXT/Apple environment for slightly more polished tools.

    3. Re:OSX On Sony? by dspisak · · Score: 1

      Hmm lets see here:

      Adobe Photoshop 7 for OS X...check
      Adobe Acrobat 6 for OS X (ugh its bloat)...check
      Adobe After Effects for OS X...check
      Adobe Preimier 6.5 for OS X....check
      Adobe Preimier Pro for OS X....no!
      Final Cut Pro 4 for OS X...check!
      Adobe Encore DVD for OS X...no!
      DVD Studio Pro 2 for OS X....check

      For starters Adobe Preimeir sucks huge amounts of ass on Windows AND Mac. Its interface is crap and its buggy as hell and crashes too often when you are in the middle of a large editing project.

      It is for shit! Now Preimeir Pro is supposed to be this great product because it is not based on the old Preimeir codebase! Its like what NT was to Windows for Workgroups for Microsoft. It remains to be seen if this is the case since its not quite out yet.

      Under OS X you have a far more stable OS then Windows and far more flexibility to integrate UNIX tools into your workflow easily. Think Fark here for OS X. Yes I am aware of Cygwin stuff for Windows but its a layer on top of Windows whereas Fark lets you addon apps that are built directly ontop of the OS X BSD foundations.

      I still have yet to see a good PC laptop that can compare to the 12" Powerbook I have.

      Besides which, just what Adobe apps are you using? If its something other the Photoshop there are some good alternatives out there that don't cost quite as much.

      Disclaimer: I started out on Apple IIe clones in the early 80's, then went to the Amiga, then to IBM PC's when the Pentium 60 was released and have both PCs and now a Mac for the last 6 months.

    4. Re:OSX On Sony? by justinkim · · Score: 1

      You could always put Linux on your PowerBook.

      There's also the Darwin core of OS X. X11 runs fine alongside OS X

    5. Re:OSX On Sony? by =weezer= · · Score: 1

      Yes, those products are available, but the original poster's point was that he already has those programs for Windows, and doesn't want to re-purchase the same product for Mac.

      If Apple extended their Trade-up to Final Cut program (allowing people to trade in Adobe Premiere to get a free copy of Final Cut Express) to apply to all Adobe products, and replace them with their Adobe Mac counterparts, then this wouldn't be a problem, but the chances of Adobe allowing this are looooooow.

    6. Re:OSX On Sony? by KH · · Score: 1

      You have a good point. But there was a Sony laptop that ran Mac OS. That was the PowerBook 100. Sony manufactured it for Apple. It can't run OS X though.

      There even was an IBM Japan designed PowerBook (1400? 2400?)

    7. Re:OSX On Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, OSX, being a some-what brain-damaged UNIX runs many many free UNIX applications. Beauty of unix is that it runs on so many platforms.

      Often you can run the same programs with OSX as on your Linux machine. (and, you can run X11 with OSX, so, X11 + OSX + Airport = killer portable X-Terminal.) OSX's Java support is also very excellent.

      Linux seems to be better overall, but, I wouldn't trust Linux on a transient laptop. (just seems like a sick thing to do)

      Far as the MS stuff goes.. Isn't it about time we quit supporting a company that routinely stabs us in the back? Next application upgrade, ask them for a Linux or OSX or FreeBSD or other UN*X version of the application. Most software vendors would probably rather support a less-threatening OS anyway. (I know Borland doesn't think too highly of microsoft)

    8. Re:OSX On Sony? by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      For starters Adobe Preimeir sucks huge amounts of ass on Windows AND Mac. Its interface is crap and its buggy as hell and crashes too often when you are in the middle of a large editing project.

      I wonder if you would have still said that if Adobe hadn't canceled premier on the Mac...

    9. Re:OSX On Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 2400 (codename: comet) was an IBM Mac.

    10. Re:OSX On Sony? by merdark · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The primary reason I'd look at a Powerbook is OS X. No other operating system can come close to comparing.

    11. Re:OSX On Sony? by Turmio · · Score: 1

      I dualboot OS X and Linux (Debian in fact) on my 15" PowerBook, thank you very much. I guess NetBSD also works with this thing. If you meant non-free OS by "binary OS" (all they look pretty much binary code to me when running, har har har), there's some room to choose. Debian won't cure your need to run Adobe apps, though...

    12. Re:OSX On Sony? by horsie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Adobe allows cross-platform upgrades on selected software titles. If you have PS7 on the PC and decided to switch to the Mac, then just call up Adobe customer service.

      You will have to sign a "Letter of Destruction" promising that you will destroy your PC version of the software and fax a copy to Adobe before they ship you your CD.

      I did it, and only paid for shipping for Adobe Photoshop 7.0...

      So you CAN switch without costing yourself an arm and a leg. As for MS products, that's an entirely different story, but then again, you also have OpenOffice for OS X as an alternative.

    13. Re:OSX On Sony? by Zandall · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. You're right. BTW does anybody know if there is any attempt by other desktop GUI makers to use the 3D processing power of GPUs to render 3D buttons and other candy UI stuff instad of wasting CPU time rendering it (as X Window and MS Windows use to do)? That's one of the reasons OS X is so responsive. Just one of them ;-)

    14. Re:OSX On Sony? by dspisak · · Score: 1

      Yes I would have.

      Note I said I got the Mac the most recently in my disclaimer.

      I used Premier on PC long before I had used it on a Mac.

      Its UI (i hate having a billion floating windows with super tiny unreadable text) and stability (it would blowup in the middle of large edits, much time was lost) simply suck ASS. Ergo see that Adobe is claiming Premier Pro as being more stable because they dumped the ENTIRE previous codebase for Premier and have been doing a rewrite from scratch for the past 2.5 years!

      So please, use your brain for rational logic and reasoning instead of being a knee-jerk troll and trying to classify me as a Mac zealot when I've quite clearly stated I use BOTH PCs and Macs.

    15. Re:OSX On Sony? by dspisak · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice for OS X is nice but I am sorry the file formats for MS Office still are not 100% compatible for the files that I run across in my day to day uses.

      Believe me I would have loved to use OpenOffice instead of MS Office but when you're dealing with document that use some fo the more advanced footnote and comments features OpenOffice just can't display the damn things right. It's because of that reason that I just said to hell with it and purchase MS Office for OS X and it works perfectly for my needs*.

      * Your needs are probably different from mine and you may find OpenOffice a viable alternative for yourself. However if you have to exchange Word docs with people who use more advanced and niche features (think authors here) then your going to be up shit creek without a paddle and buying a copy of MS Office for OS X

    16. Re:OSX On Sony? by merdark · · Score: 1

      The next generation of Windows is suppposed to include a GPU accelerated compositor similar to OS X's. As far as I know, that's the only one though.

      Of interest may also be Xr/Xc. It's not accelrated, but it does have functionality similar to Quartz (Display Postscript). Presumably it *could* be accelerated, so people say. Sorry I couldn't find a better link. There are actual spec docs floating around somewhere on the web.

      Oh, did you know that OS X uses runtime statistics to predict what program you will use next and actually preload the binary?? Another one of it's many little tweaks. ;)

      OS X is just sweet. :)

  11. You haven't looked very hard by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hmm... you obviously haven't looked very hard.

    1. Re:You haven't looked very hard by joe_bruin · · Score: 1

      when looking into buying a laptop (i was in the market for ultra-portables). the fujitsu lifebooks were definitely the winners in my book (the p2000, specifically). the sony's seem to have way too much unjustified junk that i don't want, and quite overpriced (although they do look pretty sweet).
      what finally stopped me from buying it was the crusoe processor. if they only went with intel or amd, i'd be a happy camper. but from the benchmarks i've seen, the transmetas are not even close in performance.

    2. Re:You haven't looked very hard by Kenshiro · · Score: 1

      The P5k (which the top post linked to) has a 900mhz intel, not transmeta.

      I'm typing this from an older P, though, with an 800mhz crusoe.

    3. Re:You haven't looked very hard by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      As mentioned above, the P5000 (new a couple of months ago) has an Intel processor. However, you suffer a loss of battery life as a result.

      My P-2046 (800mhz Crusoe) gets over 15 hours while just playing MP3's, and over 10 hours with the screen brightness all of the way up.

      The new Transmeta chip sounds pretty sweet - much better performance and even less energy use. Hopefully they'll make a new P based on it.

    4. Re:You haven't looked very hard by LaForce · · Score: 1

      Fujitsu has had the p2000 in production for quite a while now, at least in design. I remember looking at the Loox-T (Japanese version of the p2000) at least 3 years ago, and longed for one, but couldn't afford the extra expense to have it imported. Now that I own a P I'm impressed by its weight and built-in features (DVD-R drives should be available soon, I'm told) but not so much impressed by speed. The Crusoe may save battery life, but the 800mhz processor in my P2046 seems to perform just a touch below my previous laptop, a p3-500.

      I'm tempted to try one of the intel models, but I almost have to shy away from the higher performing processors, at least for laptops, because I'm a heat freak. I can stand to have my P on my lap for hours on end without it hardly getting warm, even maxing its pathetic processor out, but most of the other laptops I've tried get extrordinarily hot on the bottom when they run, and many even have started putting the cooling intake on the bottom of the computer. I'm not even sure my P even has a cooling fan, as I've certainly never heard one run. Anyone have a p5000 series who can give a review of it's lapability?

    5. Re:You haven't looked very hard by dybvandal · · Score: 1

      This thing looks pretty perfect. Especially the ability to swap the DVD drive for a battery and the mini s-video adapeter is very sweet. Now it only needs to make use of the about to be released ATI chipsets for better 3D performance and give a DVD-R as an option and I am sold ...

      If I can scrape together the money that is.

    6. Re:You haven't looked very hard by scosol · · Score: 1

      Heheeh yeah I feel ya- my P2040 feels just about as fast as my old P3-500 notebook-

      But hey- it can play all my movie files so thats good enough for me :)

      Took a couple days to compile oofice and mozilla tho :p

      --
      I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.
  12. A Question by X-wes · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seems Slashdotted--Here are some pics from Sony.com

    Not so much a comment as a question...

    What has really set the Vaio apart from ye olde everyday laptop was the interesting addition of the integrated still/video camera. Are there any other manufacturers out who do this? Also...is it really usable as an integrated camera?

    1. Re:A Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fucking hate sites, that have a picture and it says, "click to enlarge" and it opens a window with the exact same pic.

    2. Re:A Question by babbage · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Also...is it really usable as an integrated camera?

      I think the point of this, as it is with Apple's new iSight camera, isn't for point & shoot photography, but for use as a webcam.

      Of course, the iSight seems to be a pretty high quality piece of glass, with a fast f/2.8 aperture, standard 50mm focal length, and capable of taking in 30 frames per second of 640x480 video. The only thing the iSight is missing, really is storage: aside from the Firewire cable, it has no capability to record anything, which makes it useless without the six foot tether to your computer.

      My guess is that Sony is thinking of the same sorts of usages that Apple has in mind for iSight. I doubt the quality is as good as Apple's product, but at the same time it should hopefully be better quality than the camera they're putting on PDAs like the NX-70V that I've got. That camera is fun to use (great for getting quick snapshots at times that I wouldn't have thought to bring a real camera with me, like the supermarket or subway), but the image quality is just terrible at a very hazy & low-contrast 320x480.

      Hopefully this laptop is somewhere in the middle between the iSight & the Clie. Sony's product page doesn't seem to have camera specs, but something like a 1 or 2 megapixel still camera & 30fps video camera would be good for recording images to your hard drive, while a capacity to put out possibly lower quality stills & video over the web would be pretty nice.

      Oh, and don't forget -- if it can do the webcam thing (which I think is natural for a laptop mounted camera), plan on it being a subscription service to unlock whatever proprietary software & hardware Sony put on there. They're notorious for that kind of thing.

    3. Re:A Question by AssFace · · Score: 1

      the 17" screen laptop at powernotebooks.com has a camera in the same place as the Sony as an option.

      I haven't used on though, so I haven't any opinion of it, aside from thinking that I don't really think I'd want/use it on mine.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    4. Re:A Question by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1
      Some IBM laptops have a expansion port called "UltraPort" on top their screens where you can plug in a camera. Here's more info about it.

      Cheers!

    5. Re:A Question by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thought of the meeting scene in Cryptonomicon? Randy surreptitiously takes pictures of the faces of everyone in the room by hacking together a little script on his notebook to poll the onboard camera as they file past. Neil Stephenson thinks up cool hacks.

      September and Quicksilver are really too far away... :(

    6. Re:A Question by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

      Also...is it really usable as an integrated camera?

      I have a Sony Picturebook - PCG-C1MT or whatever the model is. The camera is... not the worst I have ever seen. It's about average for a webcam. In other words, complete crap compared to any half-decent still camera.

      It is very cute, though.

  13. Sony Notebook?? by unixwin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have you *EVER* tried to load a different OS (as in what did not come originally on the system) nto a Sony Notebook?? You will tear your hair and generally feel like throwing out the notebook... ou will find no drivers or support on their site or it, and contacting Sony will give you a response of "It did not come with that OS so we do ot support it"

    I am not talking about putting Linux/BSD or Solaris (what I am thinking??) ... just a Win2k or something.

    Plus their position/membership/stance on DMCA,RIAA et. all makes me want to spend my money elsewhere...

    --
    -- everyones not everybody and neither is everybody like everyone.
    1. Re:Sony Notebook?? by rindeee · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well...yes. I just did so last Friday. I have an old PCG-C1VN (the original Picturebook) with the Transmeta 600MHz. It came with ME preinstalled (worthless). I have run several different Linux distros on it. On Friday I reformatted it and installed W2K as I just got a T-Mobile wireless Internet card (only works on Windows...out of the box) and wanted to use it on my smallest laptop. Went to Sony's sight and clicked on the link for Installing W2K on the PCG-C1VN. Had all the drivers, and all "special instructions" for such things as installing the drivers in the right order (dependancies in effect) and getting W2K to allow the odd (1024x480) resolution. Lots of drivers to download, but no real problems. Works great with my T-Mobile card. All that said, it isn't the most useful notebook PC in the world...I much prefer my Thinkpad with SuSE 8.2.

      ER

    2. Re:Sony Notebook?? by Aix · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know about other models, but until I dropped it and broke the screen after 3+ years, I was very happy running Red Hat, then Debian and then Gentoo on my Vaio PCG-XG9. I found support for pretty much everything but the WinModem. A single anecdote does not a dataset make, but hey, you asked "Have you *EVER* tried..." and yes, I have. Successfully.

    3. Re:Sony Notebook?? by cheezedawg · · Score: 1

      Nah. I upgraded my XG-29 from Win98 to Win2k a few years back without any problems. From the looks of it right now, they have drivers available for XP too.

      Maybe other models are different.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    4. Re:Sony Notebook?? by peterprior · · Score: 1

      I've had no problems with my vaio. The pcmcia cdrom drive can make things a little akward, but thats half the fun :)

      The only thing I can see being an issue is the new Centrino chipset. Whats the linux support for this chipset like? Last thing I heard it wasn't supported very well, which could give issues with irq routing / dma etc.

    5. Re:Sony Notebook?? by common_sence · · Score: 1
      Plus their position/membership/stance on DMCA,RIAA et. all makes me want to spend my money elsewhere...

      Sony is also a media company (movies, music, etc.) Not that I agree at all with the RIAA or MPAA, but can you really blame a media company for wanting to protect it's assetts?

      --
      sig? No thanks, I don't smoke.
    6. Re:Sony Notebook?? by billatq · · Score: 1

      "Have you *EVER* tried to load a different OS (as in what did not come originally on the system) nto a Sony Notebook?? You will tear your hair and generally feel like throwing out the notebook... ou will find no drivers or support on their site or it, and contacting Sony will give you a response of "It did not come with that OS so we do ot support it"

      One time I upgraded a Japanese sony laptop with windows 98SE (Japanese) to Windows XP (English). That was a nightmare because they put a lot of hardware in there that depends on special sony drivers and software to be installed. After about 3 hours, I finally managed to find all the software that I needed to get all the buttons working on the Japanese Sony support site, but they sure don't make it easy to find. That, and windows can't tell the difference between a Japanese keyboard and a English keyboard, though the key mappings are quite a bit different, so you have to override the default settings to make it work properly. However, it was quite possible to do--it just took a while.

    7. Re:Sony Notebook?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but can you really blame a media company for wanting to protect it's assetts?

      Protecting? How are their assets being damaged?

    8. Re:Sony Notebook?? by BetaRelease · · Score: 1

      Before buying a Sony laptop. Take a look at their support site -- quite thin.

      Sony can make their electronics look good but they don't know how to do customer support at all.

    9. Re:Sony Notebook?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're full of shit. Goto SONY's support site and you will find it broken out for each model (I have an SR subnotebook, here's that page ) with all the drivers needed for W2K or XP (the SR came with ME). The W2K install was a breeze.

    10. Re:Sony Notebook?? by g_braad · · Score: 1

      Yes... and it was even easier to make it dualboot to solaris...

      i have a SR1K, the former version of the TR series... the TR looks more like a SR then the C1 (only for the camera that is).

      It's just laptop based on a standard architecture, so i don't see any problem... but perhaps you meant other in a much wider scope (OS X?) ;oP

      --
      F/OSS & IT Consultant
    11. Re:Sony Notebook?? by trh · · Score: 1

      Yes, NOW that's easy to do. When they came out, the only thing you could get was the WinME drivers. When they came out w/ the Win2k drivers, I installed them, but even then, not everything worked perfectly (unable to use the camera button to start the camera (had to launch the camera application), etc.). Same story for WinXP. It took a LONG time for them to come out with drivers, and even then, it's not guaranteed.

      Sold it, and got a Fujitsu Lifebook P-2040, and have not had any problems with it (they are really good about updating drivers, but not the CMS software, unforunately). Plus, the Lifebook has no proprietary software/drivers necessary to use the hotkeys on the keyboard - they work great under Linux (not the newest models, it seems, however).

      So yes, the Sony has drivers NOW, but when we all wanted Win2k support a long time ago, we had to wait (and I did not want to use WinMe).

    12. Re:Sony Notebook?? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      sony.com/pcsupport? or vaio.net? While thier javascript menus are kinda slow, it is not hard to navigate. Yes, Sony does not put out updates that grant additional features or performance, only to grant better stability.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    13. Re:Sony Notebook?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      while it is true that sony has started to offer some limited support of downloadable drivers, the other guy is right on: sony will fuck you and never look back. they use proprietary proprietary proprietary shit left and right and then they don't even support it themselves. their stuff is nice and seductive, but after 5 sony notebooks (and any number of other things like still and video cams) i'm fed up. no more sonys for me.

      oh, and their keyboards and batteries are crapola.

    14. Re:Sony Notebook?? by lakmiseiru · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, the major problem with loading Linux (apart from any Sony considerations) on this machine is that it has a Centrino processor.

      A nice machine, to be sure, but without Linux compatibility (in the near future, at least), it's not going to sell to anyone who's interested in a dual-boot system.

      Better to go with a slightly older model (i.e. the IBM T30 series) that has a Pentium 4 rather than a Centrino... otherwise Linux is (unless I'm wrong here, or you enjoy writing system software) out of the question.

      --

      Access denied: Not enough clue for requested operation.
    15. Re:Sony Notebook?? by falloutboy · · Score: 1

      "Have you *EVER* tried to load a different OS (as in what did not come originally on the system) nto a Sony Notebook?? You will tear your hair and generally feel like throwing out the notebook... ou will find no drivers or support on their site or it, and contacting Sony will give you a response of "It did not come with that OS so we do ot support it""

      I hate to post a me-too, but.. umm... ME TOO. I have a Vaio FX300 which came with XP Home, which sucks. I don't think I've ever used any of the preloaded apps (the preloaded Photoshop Limited Ed. install doesn't even work.. keeps asking for a serial number that Sony didn't give me). The first week I had it, I tried installing 2000 Professional on it. I tried using the Sony-supplied driver packages for similar models, and even hardware vendor-supplied drivers. It f*@king never worked right, and I ended up restoring from the CDs that came with the unit.

      Also, the CD drive seems to be stuck on single speed (150kb/s) which makes it really hard to watch video files burned to CD or copy large amounts of data. I'm a photographer, and I do a lot of digital work, and that drives me crazy. I have absolutely no idea how to fix this.

      Those complaints aside, I do like the machine. The screen is the best I've ever owned on a laptop. I don't think it competes favorably to the newest Dell or Powerbooks, but for the photography work I do, it definitely works well enough (after being properly calibrated).

      A note on PC vs. Mac: I've been using PCs running Windows and occasionally Linux for years, but in January bought a Powermac G4-733 with a DVD burner so I could make movies shot on MiniDV. I'd like to echo a sentiment expressed many times before this, which is "the right tool for the job." I dig Final Cut Pro in a big way, and OSX is pretty neat. I always get the feeling that user input is the lowest priority for the system, but months after I made my last movie, the Mac is still my primary machine.

      I saw the Sony TR1 on www.kemplar.com a few weeks ago, but it was apparantly the "Japanese Wi-Fi edition" or something. Whatever. I'm glad to see such a cool-ass machine make its way to the states. I just hope Apple doesn't sue over the similarites in the case to the Mac notebooks.

    16. Re:Sony Notebook?? by glopuk · · Score: 1

      Yes - RedHat 8 went on flawlessly onto my GR214, and the only problem I had was getting the driver working for my PCMCIA wireless network adapter - and that wasn't the laptop's fault.

    17. Re:Sony Notebook?? by Subm · · Score: 1
      I bought a Sony laptop dual boot from emperorlinux. I haven't had any problems. USB, Firewire, etc. all work (jogdial works much better in Linux than Windows). Emperorlinux upgrades its software for free periodically.



      Most importantly, their customer service is excellent.

    18. Re:Sony Notebook?? by poboxbrian · · Score: 1

      I've run Red Hat on every one of my Sonys either as the only OS or as a duel boot. I've also used Win Me and Win XP Pro on my PCG-Z505JE w/ no trouble. Furthermore, I run multiple OSes inside VMWare regardless of which OS is my base.

  14. Centrino by $exyNerdie · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Until now most of the small form factor notebooks had transmeta crusoe processor...this looks much better

    -- Sig
    (What's Google doing on time magazine? )

  15. VAIO no-way by mpd2014 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recently sold my Vaio after owning it for less than a year. Memory had problems, seemed slow and just did not live up to expectations. I recently bought a Mac PowerBook G4, my first Mac laptop and I am extremely pleased with it. Airport Extreme 802.11G works flawlessly with my Linksys router using the G standard, I have Apache, mod_perl, MySQL, PhP and host of other apps installed all working flawlessly. If you're looking for a great UI with unix under the hood look no further.

    1. Re:VAIO no-way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell is this moderated informative?

    2. Re:VAIO no-way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your advertisements to apple.com, shill.

    3. Re:VAIO no-way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phoney Macintosh astroturfers are getting ridiculous on this site.

      Do you guys get a bonus if you spend your coffee breaks shilling your companies' product?

    4. Re:VAIO no-way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see why Mac users can't speak their mind about the products they use. People always say stuff on these forums about how great their specific PC is, or their distribution of the OS they use is. So as soon as someone says anything that is pro-apple people always jump on top of that. What if someone said stuff like, take your ogg-support to an ogg website, or take your gentoo advertisement to the gentoo website, etc etc. I think you get my point...

    5. Re:VAIO no-way by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

      "Do you guys get a bonus if you spend your coffee breaks shilling your companies' product?"

      If you'd call a sore ring a bonus, I guess it's a bonus.

    6. Re:VAIO no-way by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it can get out of hand pretty easily around here... I think it's getting better though -- there was a time here when mentioning anything about Apple meant that people would come to your house and hang you by your pinkies.

    7. Re:VAIO no-way by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 1

      Why would you be running apache, mysql, etc. on a laptop machine anyway?

      I guess maybe for software development purposes...but you can run those apps on just about any machine/OS you want, what's so special about being able to run it on Mac?

    8. Re:VAIO no-way by tealover · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%. I own a VAIO PCG-GRX470 and I'm totally unhappy with it. The keyboard is crap. I had a lot of problems installing Linux on it and Sony installs so much garbage.

      I went from Dell to Sony so I'm not sure what to buy for my next laptop. Perhaps an Apple? Time will tell.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    9. Re:VAIO no-way by cshaw · · Score: 1

      I don't know what most of you are talking about. I think the main problem is user error not machine error. Alot of people on this site think they are experts when they don't know as much as they think they do.

      I have a Sony Vaio PCG-FXA49 and I dual boot xp and mandrake 9.1. It works flawlessly. I had absolutely no problems installing linux. Mandrake found and supported all my hardware. Everything works.

      So it sounds like a personal problem to me.

      I am also tired of the "buy a ibook its so neato" "its go unix underneath" "yea". It gets old. I think the ibooks are pieces of shit. They may look ok, but feel like crappy plastic.

      so start the "no there not", "you just can't understand how great apple is". but no thank you, i don't know why i would want to switch from one propreitary company to another.

  16. What we always ask here... by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 0, Funny

    What we always ask here...

    can it run Linux?

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  17. ad by heli0 · · Score: 1

    Looks like Designtechnica's new ad campaign is working out well for them.

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  18. 12" vs 10.6" by ajiva · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can this thing be better, when the screen is 1.4" smaller? Heck I think 12" is too small, but 10.6"? Geez can anyone even read /. on that? :)

    1. Re:12" vs 10.6" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever actually used a small screen or are you just blowing smoke out your ass?

      I'm guessing smoke.

    2. Re:12" vs 10.6" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can read Slashdot on it...

      I have a hitachi visionbook (P133, 1 GB, 40 MB RAM, 2.7 lbs!) with an 8.4" 640x480 screen and with the exception of the occasional need to scroll sideways, browsing the web works just fine.

      Just a little perspective for those who haven't used hardware like that since years ago...

    3. Re:12" vs 10.6" by tenor · · Score: 1

      Smaller screen? Based on inches maybe. But the VAIO has 1280x768 resolution, whereas the PowerBook has 1028x768. I just dropped by CompUSA tonight to look at them, and the VAIO is a smart little machine. The pre-installed Windows-XP blows, but the resolution is wild. It has the same resolution (per inch) as the Clie line. First notebook with usable 5 point fonts :)

      It is way smaller and lighter than the PowerBook as well. If this thing ran OS X it would be a no-brainer. It's good to hear that people have had positive experiences loading Linux onto these things, because the VAIO includes XP Home addition. So even if you like XP it's a downer.

      All things equal, I can't decide between the two.

      Note: the Apple guy at CompUSA and the regular notebook guy were practically in fisticuffs about this thing. I had the Apple guy hovering around me, iBook in hand, while I was checking out the VAIO. I think he smells competition ;)

      --
      Opinions change daily as new information arrives. Stay tuned.
    4. Re:12" vs 10.6" by Squidgee · · Score: 1

      Actually, it says nowhere what the resolution is to be, but if I had to guess, it'll be 1024x768. *shrug* Could be wrong. =p

  19. Linux support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    12" Powerbook killer... err except that all Apple hardware is very well supported by linux... whereas the Centrino 802.11b isn't supported at all. So your fancy subnotebook is going to have an 802.11b card sticking out the side.

    Unless you want to run Windows that is, in which case you have bigger problems. :)

    1. Re:Linux support by obi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, unless you count the Airport Extreme (broadcom won't release the specs) and the nVidia on PPC 3D card (nVidia don't want to recompile theor drivers for PPC).

      Centrino works, aside from the wavelan card.

    2. Re:Linux support by naitro · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a 12" PowerBook G4 which I run Debian on.

      The 802.11g-chip isn't supported by Linux at all and nVidia doesn't release their Linux drivers for PowerPC - I wouldn't call that "very well supported".

      But apart from the WLAN and the fancy graphic drivers (I use the one bundled with XFree86 4.3.0) it works like a charm :-).

    3. Re:Linux support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your fancy subnotebook is going to have a card sticking out the side

      Good point. Be aware that the PowerBook 12 has no card slots, so forget about using any past or future networking standards.

    4. Re:Linux support by yeschat · · Score: 1

      That's a good point and a good idea, but what does putting Linux on a Powerbook or a Vaio have to do with this article? Seems to me Apple isn't promoting the fact that their Powerbook can handle Linux, and I dont think Sony is going for that market either.

    5. Re:Linux support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Unless you want to run Windows that is, in which case you have bigger problems. :) "

      Yeah, in that it will actually work.

    6. Re:Linux support by DerKlempner · · Score: 1

      Unless you want to run Windows that is, in which case you have bigger problems. :)

      Problems? As compared to the person who arbitrarily puts down another person because of a difference in choice and opinion?

      Wow, talk about a skewed sense of reality...
      --
      UNIX: Find it, fsck it, forget it.
    7. Re:Linux support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whereas the Centrino 802.11b isn't supported at all

      I thought the point of open source was the ability to add support for it... maybe you should just run Windows and stop whining - XP ain't that bad (and it actually works with your hardware unlike Linux).

    8. Re:Linux support by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Seriously, though. Why the hell would you replace OSX with Linux? That just does not make sense. What can you do on PPC Linux that you can't do on PPC BSD?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Linux support by obi · · Score: 1

      The answer's simple: I've got a whole bunch of machines here running Debian. OSX is definately cool, and I would keep it on the machine for when I need to run soft that doesn't run on Linux. But it's nice to have the same environment everywhere to develop in.

      Also, debian is a godsend for me with all its software, and I'm not too happy with fink up till now...

      Now if there was a debian/osx like there's a debian/bsd, now that would be cool.

    10. Re:Linux support by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Recompiling the app to run on PowerPC is going to be much more difficult than recompiling it to run on BSD, so if you're going to do one, why not do both?

      Not like either is blindingly difficult...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  20. Does a bear shit in the woods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the Pope a Catholic?

    1. Re:Does a bear shit in the woods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope he's a Pole.

  21. It doesn't look so hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks pretty white and texty if you ask me. It's also telling me to check my network settings.

  22. where's my OPENGL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    via radeon or geforce

    i don't care, but at least the slowest of the powerbooks have a radeon in them.

  23. Well it's slashdotted ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2, Informative
    But yeah there's a little problem with calling it a "powerbook killer" for one, it doesn't run Mac OS. That would be a key component for it to "kill" the power book's notebook share. Plus lets face it there are many laptops for many needs. Many things come into play when purchasing a laptop and best bang for the buck seems to be the #1 reason people actually buy laptops.

    While this may be cool (wouldn't know can't read the article), let's face it people will sacrifice weight, size, and battery life for a cheaper model that does the same thing. UNLESS they are walking around with the thing, or travel a lot, or have a particular breifcase they'd like this to fit it. Believe it or not I've seen someone buy a new laptop because it was the right "size" of the breif case they had grown quite accustomed to.

    12" is hard to read at a res bigger than 1024x768 as well. I really don't see this thing killing anything as there are so many laptops on the market now that no one can decide on one "ultimate" laptop.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Well it's slashdotted ... by greymond · · Score: 1

      It's true - I keep buying Thinkpads because I have this really cool IBM sling bag that can transform into a back pack or briefcase - its super comfy too in any position and holds all my accessories perfectly.

      Of course my mammoth Thinkpad may not be as sleak as others Sony or Toshiba, but it works for what I want and was cheeper.

    2. Re:Well it's slashdotted ... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      But yeah there's a little problem with calling it a "powerbook killer" for one, it doesn't run Mac OS

      Very good, but the one thing stopping most people from getting a powerbook is the fact that it doesn't run windows...

  24. Price, price, price by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apple's 12" Powerbook costs $1,600 ($1,400 for students), while the new Sony Vaio is expected to cost around $2,000. Even with the cheaper price, the Apple laptop gives you 10GB more hard drive space, and a larger screen, and OS X as well. The only advantage I see is the weight difference, as the Sony weighs 32% less than the Apple. As long as you don't have trouble lifting 4.6 pounds, go for the Apple. :^)

    1. Re:Price, price, price by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      lets not forget the DVD recorder / CD-RW that comes with the powerbook.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Price, price, price by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Actually, DVD-R option for the 12" Powerbook costs another $200 to purchase, so I didn't mention it for price reasons... But yes, you could have a DVD-R equipped 12" Powerbook for less than the cost of one of these new Sony laptops.

    3. Re:Price, price, price by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      i'm a student...I get it for 1400 :-)

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Price, price, price by Bronz · · Score: 2, Insightful


      And using that logic... I recently purchased an HP laptop with a 14" XGA screen for $599 after rebates! You have to understand that when laptops get _smaller_ they sometimes get more expensive. Knowing this, you won't say strange things like "laptop X is cheaper AND bigger!"

    5. Re:Price, price, price by rzbx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Want good price and small size. Check out the Fujitsu P2000 series. Starting at around $1300. http://www.fujitsupc.com/

      Few quick specs:
      Transmeta 933mhz Crusoe
      10.6" Widescreen SXGA
      256 RAM, up to 384
      DVD/CD-RW drive
      Mobility Radeon
      2.8-3.4 lbs
      optional built in wireless as well

      Too small for me though, so I bought the S2000 with the AMD proc.

      --
      Question everything.
    6. Re:Price, price, price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife and i both have the dual usb iBooks. We go months at a time without rebooting. open, use, close. open, use, close.

      The only reason to reboot is upgrades. XP may take less time to boot than previous windows, but you still need to do it.

    7. Re:Price, price, price by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple's 12" Powerbook costs $1,600 ($1,400 for students), while the new Sony Vaio is expected to cost around $2,000.

      That's probably because the Sony hardware is quite a bit nicer: 3 pounds vs. 4.6 pounds, 1280x768 screen vs. 1024x768 screen, PCMCIA slot vs. no PCMCIA slot, USB2 vs. no USB2. The difference in weight alone is a huge difference and should more than account for the price difference.

      If you want something directly comparable to the 12" Powerbook, the Fujitsu P5000 is the same price and the same weight. And the Fujitsu P2000 is actually smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the 12" Powerbook (although has somewhat fewer features).

    8. Re:Price, price, price by viol2001 · · Score: 1

      That's probably because the Sony hardware is quite a bit nicer: 3 pounds vs. 4.6 pounds, 1280x768 screen vs. 1024x768 screen, PCMCIA slot vs. no PCMCIA slot, USB2 vs. no USB2. The difference in weight alone is a huge difference and should more than account for the price difference.

      And with your 10.6" screen at 1280x768, are you going to be able to read anything? And the PCMCIA...what do you really need it for? Wireless...built in (on both machines). Bluetooth...built in on the powerbook, for those that use it. The USB2...yes, it's nice to have, but only if you can't find what you want using firewire, which is a better technology anyway (usb being cpu intensive, firewire not).

      In addition to those points, you are forgetting the bigger harddrive on the powerbook...and the fact that and 867 G4 is definately faster than a 900 centrino.

      If you really need less weight and possibly longer battery life, the sony is for you...oh, and remember that extra $400...

    9. Re:Price, price, price by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      If you really need less weight and possibly longer battery life, the sony is for you...oh, and remember that extra $400...

      Yes, that's what the extra $400 are for with the Sony: the smaller size and the lighter weight. If you want something more directly comparable to the 12" Powerbook, you can get any of a number of x86-based laptops with pretty much the same size and price, the Fujitsu P5000 being one of them.

      I'm sorry--while the 12" Powerbook is a reasonably nice laptop, but it is nothing special either in terms of pricing, features, or size.

    10. Re:Price, price, price by viol2001 · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes, this is true...
      I realized that this story is trying to compare two products that really aren't directly comparable. The Sony is for those who want the smaller, lighter notebook, while the powerbook is for those wanting a little more power, who don't mind the extra size and weight (which, 12" and 4.6 pounds is still light, but yes, i realize it does matter to some).

      The P5000 is a good comparison...it still has the slower 900Mhz centrino, but has the nice ability to swap out the cdrw/dvd for a battery.

      It really comes down to which OS you want to run...for my part, I like OS X much better than Linux or Windows. It has more polish than Linux and is easier to configure, while still letting those who want to play with the underlying darwin do so...which allows for all of the advantages that Linux already has over Windows. So the OS really is the deciding factor. I don't know what Fujitsu's support is like, but that's also another aspect at which Apple really shines.

    11. Re:Price, price, price by frogfroth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Another *possible* advantage of the Sony would be the integrated cameara. However, the new iSight from Apple probably produces better images and for $1800 (12"PB w/SuperDrive) + $150 iSight even without discounts the machine comes in at a lower price, in addition to getting *DVD burner *extra two inches of screen, give or take *OS X and iLife, etc. etc. *FireWire Hmm, doens't seem much like a PowerBook killer at all.

    12. Re:Price, price, price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasn't anyone thought that perhaps some people may want the smaller screen? I wanted a nice, small laptop and this new Sony fits the bill perfectly. The extra 1.4" screen and extra weight is contrary to my needs. Also, the Apple OS is worthless to me so that is a big minus right there for the Powerbook. And the Centrino moniker or not, this processor is snappy and its power management is excellent.
      BTW, the price for the Sony is list. I got my TR1A Vaio for a decent $1899 (that includes 512MB RAM whereas the Powerbook only comes with 256 MB at its base price, I believe).
      Another problem with the Powerbook is Apple's refusal to get on the USB bandwagon. The Vaio has 2 USB 2.0 ports and isn't saddled with 1.1 USB as the Powerbook is. And the screen on the Vaio is the best laptop screen bar none. Even watching DVDs on this thing is a pleasure. You can't truly understand how superb it is until you see it.
      Finally, why would I care about a DVD-Burner on an ultra portable? I mean, CD-Burners are ubiquitous, OK. But just what are people buying these computers for anyway? Unless I were looking for a desktop replacement, I can't think of any reason I would need to burn a DVD with an on-the-go portable. But I guess that is just me.
      Anyway, in my mind, it is every bit the Powerbook killer and more.

  25. But.. by Aliencow · · Score: 1

    Does it play ogg ?

    1. Re:But.. by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      No, not yet.

      The Centrino is missing essential floating point instructions (muls,mulu,adda,addq) which makes the floating point Ogg decoder choke.

      Since the integer Ogg decoder isn't yet finished, no Ogg on the Vaio yet.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  26. Re:They're not. by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Just the Mac-heads here do that.
    With story titles like "Powerbook Killer?", wouldn't you expect the Mac-heads to defend themselves?
  27. Untapped Market? by VidarJMD · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems to me there is a largely untapped market for notebooks. As I shop for one I am looking for a small, lightweight system with a long lasting battery. What I am NOT looking for is a 1Ghz+ system. I do not want a laptop that replaces my desktop but instead one that accompanies it. 500MHz is plenty for something that I would use for word processing, listening to music, and browsing the web. As processor technology improves you'd thing the long battery life and other features would make a great combination with older processors but I never see that. The only choice is to buy an old laptop but it's big and bulky and usually used. On top of that the cost savings isn't enough to warrent such a device. Why don't I ever see something like this: Pentium III 500MHz 20GB Harddrive 128MB RAM 12 inch screen 4lbs or less And some crappy 4MB video for $500 I'd buy one in a heartbeat. I just want something portable yet more capable than a PDA. I don't want to replace my desktop.

    1. Re:Untapped Market? by gmg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The specs that you mentioned are quite close to the old Toshiba Portege 1740ct. I recall that it came with a much smaller hard drive (6 or 10 gigs), but everything else is the same, including the crappy 4 meg trident cyblade video card. I dont recall battery life. Ran debian quite nicely though. Ironically, used 1740s are probably selling for less than $500 on the internet right now.

    2. Re:Untapped Market? by ksi440 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Pointed out earlier in this thread, but Fujitsu seems to be the leader in this area.

      Check here and look at the ultraportable section. The specs on the P5000 seem to match your requirements.

      Also, on the seriously portable side, they have the P1000 (2.2 lbs, no cd) and the P2000 (3.4 lbs, DVD ).

    3. Re:Untapped Market? by higginsm2000 · · Score: 1

      Errr....except the price.

    4. Re:Untapped Market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just had the same discussion with my friend who is now in charge of buying for the aeronautical company he works for and he says he has yet to authorize a laptop upgrade....

      a Thinkpad running P3-900 with 256megs ram DOES NOT have to be replaced for people who basically run spreadsheet, powerpoint, browser, mail client.
      A few CAD program users but they never bitched. its the sales and marketing guys (surprise) who are always claiming that NOT having a Powerbook is affecting their work.

      zeke

    5. Re:Untapped Market? by yppiz · · Score: 1
      The Japan-only Sony VAIO PCG-U101 is what you are describing. 600MHz Centrino, 256-512MB RAM, 30G HD, 2lbs. It's only got a 10.4" screen, but it's 1024x768 and has a zoom button.

      Linux on the U101

      Dynamism U101 page

      Sony U101 page (in Japanese)

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    6. Re:Untapped Market? by Raleel · · Score: 1

      http://www.lindows.com/799

      celeron 900, 20g hdd, 256 megs ram, 12" screen, 2.9 pounds.

      that do for you?

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    7. Re:Untapped Market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a used 12" iBook! I'm typing this on one of the newer models, but I'm sure the older ones would do just fine. I'm sure you could find one for between 500 and 800. New, well...that's harder.

    8. Re:Untapped Market? by yppiz · · Score: 1
      I just noticed you wanted a $500 machine. The ancestors of the U101 are the Sony PCG-U1 and PCG-U3. U1s are available on eBay for $700 (recent completed eBay auction), which is a bit better than the $1500-$1700 importer price for the U101. The U1 and U3 are Transmeta machines and have smaller screens than the U101.

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    9. Re:Untapped Market? by stripmarkup · · Score: 1

      That's exactly how I think. Last week I got a vaio z505hs for about $550 including memory upgrade to 256MB, PC-card powered cd-rom drive. It's a 500 Mhz P3 with a 12 Gb disk. Browse eBay for z505hs/he/js/ls etc.

      --
      See charts for twitter trends on Trendistic
    10. Re:Untapped Market? by cgori · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's my laptop!

      Sony VAIO Z505R. It's about 4 years old so only a Pentium II 366, replaced the HD with an IBM 30GB 2.5" for about 100 bucks, quieter too. 192MB memory, 12inch screen, about 4.5 pounds with the triple battery. No builtin wireless but one PCMCIA slot for your flavor of choice (a/b/g). I love it. It's perfect for xterms/emacs/mozilla/xmms.

      Might I recommend ebay to you? (either the R, RX, S or SX will probably fit the bill, the J or H models I think are P3-500ish procs). Expect to need to replace the drive, they were originally in the 6-10GB size.

    11. Re:Untapped Market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look on ebay for an older laptop like the
      one I'm using right now, I bought it for about
      $400 a year or so ago on ebay. It's a sony
      vaio pcg-505ts -- small, but very quiet because
      there are no cooling fans, and it has pcmcia,
      firewire, usb, audio, and all that. I'm
      running gentoo linux on it.

    12. Re:Untapped Market? by babbage · · Score: 1
      Go used, it's the best way.

      Keep an eye on sites like Craigslist. Every day, the classified ad section on Craigslist's Boston site has people selling old & not-so-old laptops like the one you describe -- IBM Thinkpad's have an excellent reputation, and I keep seeing them offered for as little as $400. I've been hoping to find a good deal on a iBook or G3 PowerBook, but the prices for each are still generally in the $600-$800 range for low-spec machines, and much more for high end ones.

      It's weird, in the first year of ownership, computers lose 70% (or whatever) of their market value (more like 30% for Apple gear, *mumble* *grumble*), but they as long as you don't trash the thing they lose very little of their utility in the same time frame. It seems to me that the best way to get a reasonable deal is to buy used, for both desktops & laptops. I'd assume that most of the people that read Slashdot are savvy enough to nurse a possibly not-so-gently used machine back to health, and if you're not looking to play games or do similar computationally intensive work then there's little reason to pay the premium for cutting edge equipment.

    13. Re:Untapped Market? by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      Why don't I ever see something like this: Pentium III 500MHz 20GB Harddrive 128MB RAM 12 inch screen 4lbs or less And some crappy 4MB video for $500

      You don't see that because slow chips aren't actually cheaper than current generation chips: the cheapest way of making a laptop is out of the highest-volume components, and those happen to be faster. In fact, if you try to get really old chips, it gets really expensive again.

      However, some manufacturers are trying. VIA has had success with their low-cost Mini-ITX boards, and they are trying to push the same concept for laptops and tablets.

    14. Re:Untapped Market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Craigslist -> Great market for stolen equipment for sellers and buyers.

    15. Re:Untapped Market? by tade · · Score: 1

      Not sure about your country, but in Finland the laptop market is mainly a business-machine market, and you bet if you can manage without latest graphics accelerator and the stuff, the business people could do well with a lightweight machine that has a long lasting battery and basic office tools.

      But because corporations are more willing to pay for a good laptop, there aren't good low-end machines around. Might be because they don't want to cut their own profits, and extra 200 for support seems more reasonable on a $2000 machine than on $500 machine. I don't know. Thats what i think. I mean who would buy a 15" laptop that weighs 10 lbs if there were cheap machines that did the same stuff.

    16. Re:Untapped Market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want a JVC/Interlink 3210 or one of the followup models. Sold in Japan and Europe. Dynamism has them for the US market. the 7210 model is currently going for 1200eur incl VAT. THinking about picking it up soon.

      -t

    17. Re:Untapped Market? by ewen · · Score: 1
      Why don't I ever see something like this: Pentium III 500MHz 20GB Harddrive 128MB RAM 12 inch screen 4lbs or less

      There are laptops in this category (give or take the processor speed) from most major laptop manufacturers (ASUS is the only one I recall seeing that didn't have a model in this category, and that may just be a New Zealand thing).

      800MHz to 1000MHz is roughly standard for such a laptop new these days, and expect a Mobile Pentium III rather than a desktop one (to extend the battery life). Older laptops like that do come up second hand from time to time, generally with about 600MHz CPUs these days, but you have to watch closely as they generally get snapped up quickly.

      Oh, and expect to pay quite a price premium for 4lb or less laptops. My Acer Travelmate 361EVi (about 3.5lbs -- 1.7kg) sold for about 40% more than a similar traditional laptop (around the 6lb sort of weight). But since I carry it around every day it's easily been worth the extra money.

      Finally at 4lbs a long lasting battery is about 3 hours. At 5lbs (eg, weight of a 12" iBook) you might be able to get 5 hours if you sacrifice a bunch of other things to get battery life. To get much longer than that you should expect a lot more weight -- 6 lbs or 7lbs at least -- as it generally involves two batteries. And batteries are heavy.

      Ewen

    18. Re:Untapped Market? by timbrown · · Score: 1

      I've an old 366Mhz PII powered Thinkpad 570 (192Mb RAM, 6.4Gb HD) running Debian unstable (it also runs Windows 2K at a reasonable speed in VMware) that I use like this. It weighs in at 4lb exactly and if you can find one on eBay or elsewhere I really recommend it. It's nicely supported by Linux and if you can do without an internal CD-ROM it should fit the bill nicely. Mine cost me just over 300ukp.

      --
      Tim Brown
    19. Re:Untapped Market? by zarqman · · Score: 1

      couple of thoughts for you.

      1) apple ibook. new or used. my 700mhz gets 4.5 hours of battery life with the screen dimmed, but still on. if i cut it off (eg: just playing mp3s) i can get 7+ hours.

      2) consider auctions -- and i don't mean ebay. rather, consider physical auctions in or near your town - think government or university surplus. risk is high, but cost is really low. some let you test equipment a day or more early, some don't. if you want more details on that, email me.

      --
      geek friendly VPS's and free API enabled DNS : zerigo.com
  28. PB 12" Killer? by bastard01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Um, if I remember the benches for everyday use, there already was a 12" powerbook killer. Not much less performance, with the exception on altivec, and cheaper too.

  29. linux-sony mailing list by rtnz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not sure if this one runs Linux but anyone else running Linux on Sony Laptops should check out the linux-sony mailing list.

  30. Powerbook Killer? by phatcat625 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Honestly, PC's at one point had Apple begging for scraps at the dinner table like a dog. However biased you are, Apple will not just disappear into the good night. First off, 900 MHz Centrino isn't going to beat the 867 G4 considering that the G4 competes quite well with the intel mobile market. DVD-R? No. Up to 1152 MB memory? Think again. 60 GB hard drive? HA. Any OS besides windows... Dream On. So what about this Powerbook Killer? I would look at it and say... "oh it's a Sony" and then look at something else.

    1. Re:Powerbook Killer? by common_sence · · Score: 1
      DVD-R? Yes, external firewire.

      Up to 1152MB memory? Not quite, but 1024 is close enough.

      60GB Hard Drive? Nope. 80GB.

      Any OS besides Windows? Yup. Linux, BSD, etc.

      Please check your facts before foaming at the mouth.

      --
      sig? No thanks, I don't smoke.
    2. Re:Powerbook Killer? by Alex_Ionescu · · Score: 1

      Price? 600$ more

      Screen? 1 inch smaller

      Please check your facts as well.

    3. Re:Powerbook Killer? by phatcat625 · · Score: 1

      I meant an onboard DVD-R And did you miss the post about not being able to find drivers for Sony laptops? Oh you didn't? How about performance?

    4. Re:Powerbook killer? by Squidgee · · Score: 1

      Oh, and since the $2000 is the base price, then it's actually $400 more and the AliBook.

    5. Re:Powerbook Killer? by common_sence · · Score: 1

      Neither of which were in the post I replied to.

      --
      sig? No thanks, I don't smoke.
  31. Ok, let's get this over with... by upplepop · · Score: 1

    1. They must have been running their web server on one of these! 2. Imagine a beowolf cluster of these babies!

  32. 12" Powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This VAIO costs $700 more than a 12" Powerbook. Show me a Mac user who actually wants a Windows machine, or better yet, wants to pay *more* for one?

    1. Re:12" Powerbook killer? by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      This VAIO costs $700 more than a 12" Powerbook.

      Yes, it does. That's because it is considerably nicer hardware: 1.5 pounds lighter (3 pounds vs. 4.6 pounds), higher resolution screen, more ports.

      Show me a Mac user who actually wants a Windows machine, or better yet, wants to pay *more* for one?

      You're, of course, right: this machine is not a 12" Powerbook killer. Nothing could be a 12" Powerbook killer because Mac users are Mac users and they buy Apple no matter what.

    2. Re:12" Powerbook killer? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Informative
      More ports? My iBook (and that counts PowerBooks) has all the ports I need. I don't wan't any more thanks.

      As pointed out earlier, the PowerBook also has a DVD-R drive and a couple of other goodies.

      The only thing the Sony has going for it is weight and slightly higher resolution (which is a bad thing for some people aswell, since the screen is smaller to). If it was the same price we might have a contest here.

    3. Re:12" Powerbook killer? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does. That's because it is considerably nicer hardware: 1.5 pounds lighter (3 pounds vs. 4.6 pounds), higher resolution screen, more ports.

      But the Powerbook has a larger hard drive; larger screen (whats the point of a high resolution on a tiny screen?); a DVD-R drive; 802.11g; a display adapter that supports VGA, S-Video and composite, and a modem (didn't see one mentioned for the Viao). So unless you need that built in camera or the lighter weight I would say the 12" Powerbook is the one with "considerably nicer hardware".

    4. Re:12" Powerbook killer? by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      Well, the real 12" Powerbook killers have been around since before the 12" Powerbook even existed: x86-based laptops that are more powerful and cost about the same amount of money. The Sony is amazing because it is considerably lighter and smaller while still having a DVD drive.

      As for ports, the 12" Powerbook lacks both USB2 and PCMCIA, and I consider that a very serious limitation no matter what other features it has.

    5. Re:12" Powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the point behind the story. The Sony laptop is amazing because it manages to squeeze all those drives into a package that's much smaller and lighter than the Powerbook. If you just want something comparable to the Powerbook in features and performance, there have been many of those around for a while.

    6. Re:12" Powerbook killer? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      And you're missing my point, which is that they really aren't comparible. :) If size and weight are very important to you, the Viao is superior, but if you can stand the extra 1.5 pounds the Powerbook has a lot more features for a lower price.

      Basically, these laptops are in different classes, with the Viao being super light and the 12" PB being a good compromize between size and features.

  33. uhh... Don't forget about support by danlor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you ever tried to call Sony's support desk? I have a pretty sweet little sony R505-ELK. It has been a really great machine, until I started loosing sectors. So I called them up to get a warentee replacement. They told me... and I quote... "That's only a couple megs! You have a 30 gig drive. That doesn't come close to meeting our criteria for failure." They went on to explain that they would not replace the drive until it was completely nonfunctional.

    So. Please keep this in mind before you make the leap. Dell and Apple have high support ratings for a reason. Your laptop WILL fail at some point. Make sure you pick a company that honors thier warentees. Although as of late, Dell has been getting pretty bad too.

    1. Re:uhh... Don't forget about support by kinnell · · Score: 1
      They went on to explain that they would not replace the drive until it was completely nonfunctional.

      Have you tried microwaving it?

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    2. Re:uhh... Don't forget about support by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 1
      I'd like to second this. I was very happy with my Vaio until the hinge snapped after 11 months (this has also happened on 2 other Vaios I know of). I was told that because it might take more than 1 month to repair (partly because it had to be shipped to belgium to be repaired!), and that my warranty ran out in one month I wasn't covered! After weeks of arguing (and legal advice) I got it fixed for free.

      Next the backlight went, after the warranty expired. They wanted 10 GBP from me ("to open a case") before they'd even discuss about getting it fixed - all I wanted to do was to send the bloody thing back and get it repaired, but I had to spend 40 minutes on the the phone answering idiotic questions.

      My keyboard has now gone, and I can't face speaking to those arseholes again, so my iotherwise functional laptop is gathering dust. I will never, ever buy a Vaio again. Loved the machine - hated the company.

    3. Re:uhh... Don't forget about support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to concur on the apple part. My iBook had trouble with the touchpad. A guy from DHL (UPS-Clone) picked it up Thurs. around noon, it got shipped to Amsterdam for repairs (from Frankfurt) and it was delivered to me on monday morning. No expense on my side too, and the problem solved. I really liked this.

    4. Re:uhh... Don't forget about support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I used to work for Apple support, and I can assure you that currently Apple support really really sucks, especially for portables. I speak from hard experience.

  34. Redundant moderators by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    I wish people who moderate redundant would check the posting times. When a new article opens up, there's a flood of posts within minutes of each other. There's no way short of Elron Super Powerz to know that someone else is about to post basically the same thing.

    And I hope that all meta-moderators examine all redundant moderations in context.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Redundant moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod parent Off Topic".

    2. Re:Redundant moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And I hope that all meta-moderators examine all redundant moderations in context.

      Not me. I just mark them all "Unfair."

  35. Totally different kettles of fish... by Goonie · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen the pictures of this one, but my former boss (hey Bill, if you're still reading /.), had an older generation of Picturebook. They are much smaller than a Picturebook, or indeed anything else with a (sorta) full-size keyboard. Depending on what you intend to do with a notebook computer, the extra portability (you can shove one in a backpack and still have plenty of room for other stuff) makes them an alternative worth looking at.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  36. Bah, NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    powerbook killer
    Yea....Ok.

    This subnote is packed full of features: integrated camera (still and video),

    Sony has a history of not sharing ANY information about the camera. So it won't work with BSD or *Linux.

    For this to be a 'powerbook' killer:
    1) Sony would have to be less onerous than Apple (Sony supports the DMCA, Apple didn't)
    2) The Sony product would have to run BSD. And, well, Sony wants money, so it whores itself to Microsoft

    Sorry Sony. Go back to making rice cookers that burn rice.

    1. Re:Bah, NOT! by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

      Why anyone would buy a laptop with an integrated camera is beyond me. Aside from it being proprietary, the camera only serves as a webcam or a quick in-front-of-the-computer shot. I can't imagine anyone toting a computer to take pictures of the Grand Canyon or other scenic places. I doubt this camera will allow you to adjust the shutter speed, aperature, or other settings. Another point worth mentioning is that the camera (from http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity /eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-S tart;sid=LDp-rnTJAr5-kkvVW110pTvGOpFAyy8seS8=?Cata logCategoryID=7gwKC0%2eNOosAAAD2WYTZ7HTA&Dept=cpu& TemplateName=item%2fsy_item_b&ProductID=FAQKC0%2eN LzUAAAD2CJfZ7HTD&ContentItemPage=)
      is only a "CMOS 370,000 pixels (VGA 640x480)". Even a mediocre digital camera will outperform the integrated one.

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
  37. This is news?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a Toshiba Libretto years ago. Size of a VHS tape. Fujitsu's had a subnotebook line for years (better specs than the libretto). And this isn't even new for Sony. They've had PictureBooks for years.

    Come on, slashdot, try to keep up.

  38. Sony uses ACPI not good for non MS OS by chaffed · · Score: 1

    Sony laptops use ACPI instead of APM. This makes lif very difficult for loading non MS OS's. Though there is some great work being done for linux it is still not at a usable and stable level. This may change come the 2.6 kernel but I doubt it.

    --
    What could possibly go wrong?
    1. Re:Sony uses ACPI not good for non MS OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can run FreeBSD like the blazes on my sony notebooks.
      Maybe you should switch?

    2. Re:Sony uses ACPI not good for non MS OS by rtnz · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is not true. There are plenty of people including me running ACPI on a sony-laptop without any problems. You can check out the mailing list archives for more info. The problem is that most distro's don't include ACPI by default (except SuSe at least), but the new RedHat beta that came out today includes ACPI in it. Building your own kernel with the ACPI patch is not a bit deal as well.

    3. Re:Sony uses ACPI not good for non MS OS by chaffed · · Score: 1

      I did that using the lattest sources for both the acpi patch and kernel. It did not work well with my wireless card and a usb serial adapter I had. Also battery life suffered.

      --
      What could possibly go wrong?
  39. Screen resolution vs. screen size by Amit+J.+Patel · · Score: 1
    12" is hard to read at a res bigger than 1024x768 as well.

    This all depends on your font size, no? I just got a laptop that offers 1400x1050 on a 14.1" screen, and it's beautiful. Yes, I had to increase the default font sizes, and yes, ads on web sites are smaller, but the text is easier to read than on the lower resolution screens. Given this experience, I now want to see the Dells that have even higher resolution (1600? 1900?).

    - Amit

  40. You're Forgetting the Toilet Seat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I remember Apple laptop (the toilet seat model) owners drooled over my Sony Vaio (one of the super slim models) for years till the Powerbooks finally caught up. Apple has fantastic design aesthetics, but Sony's got it too.

  41. The real 12" PowerBook Killer is the IBM X31 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real 12" PowerBook Killer is the IBM X31, beside the lack of intergrated optical media it has it all, and the 1.4 Ghz Pentium-M is really fast (notably faster than my P4 2.4 Ghz Desktop when there is no 3D involved)

  42. One of the most important questions for a subnote by Tyrdium · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How's the screen and keyboard? I drooled over the Actius MM10 for months, but when I went to Micro Center I immediately hated it. The 10" screen tries to pack in a resolution of 1024 x 768, and the keyboard is tiny. Heck, the thing is even missing one of the shift keys... Since most of what I do on a subnote is typing (since, given their power, they aren't decent for gaming), screen size and keyboard usability (and battery life) are some of the largest factors for me. My iBook has a great keyboard (the one on the 12" PB G4 is even better), an amazing screen, and a battery life of over four hours. The only thing I don't like about it is the lack of a PCMCIA slot and the fact that Apple tech repair keeps sending it back with problems (the thing is making this really annoying ticking noise, and the ethernet port is shot). The ethernet port wouldn't be such a big deal, except that it has no PCMCIA slot for me to plug an adapter into, there are no Mac drivers for any USB adapters, and they want 600ish bucks to get the motherboard replaced... Conclusion: Macs make great lightweight notebooks, but have a few design flaws. All in all, they're probably better than the new Sony laptop.

  43. Powerbooks are the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems every new laptop these days is compared to the Powerbooks, which shows that Apple has set the standard for laptops that everyone else now has to measure up to.

  44. Shhh! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The powerbook is more expensive! Macs have to be more expensive, or what would the trolls complain about (Greater ease of use? Longer battery life?)?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Shhh! by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      Or higher quality construction? Or new features first (802.11g, Bluetooth, DVD-R, Firewire, USB)? The trolls have really run out of things to say.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    2. Re:Shhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If only Macs (still) had greater ease of use. *sigh*

      signed, a former Machead, wondering "what the fuck?" happened to the best HI

  45. i'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i know that you sir, are probably trolling, but i'll bite anyway.

    At comparable clock speeds a RISC chip always smokes a CISC chip. The G4 would massive trounce that other. :)

  46. Does it run OS X? by Phantasmo · · Score: 1, Redundant

    No, no OS X for this machine. Guess it's not a Powerbook killer.

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  47. An Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony let's you stick Memory Sticks into any of their products. Plus they have a jog dial.

    But really, this is a super-slim compact device. Very portable.

  48. Dell Latitude LS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm typing this on one right now...

    While you can't get them new, you can find them on eBay for ~$450. (probably less)

    Pros:
    They have a 12" screen, they're about an inch thick, and weigh about 3.5 lbs.
    I've seen two models (PIII 400 and 500) and come with 128mb RAM or 256. The default hard drive was only 6gb, but people have upgraded them. (or you can do it yourself, as they use standard 2.5" drives). They have only one PCMCIA slot, but the modem and NIC are built in.

    Cons:
    CD-ROMS/Floppy drives are external, the video card is only 2.5mb with a screen resolution of 800x600 (1280x1024 scrolling or with an external monitor.), and the battery life isn't so great. (~2 hours, new. (Although someone told me about larger sized batteries, I have yet to see them))

    HTH

  49. this doesn't quite compare to apple by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1
    One it has 10.6 in display compare to 12" apple. I ll need a magnifying glass just to read the text. Why so small? Does an inch of screen weigh that much?

    Intel on board graphics with 64 mg Shared memory vs a 32 MB Geforce 4. You can forget about games with that Intel crap. Just work. work, work.

    Processors are about even. I won't bother arguing this.

    Battery Life: 2-7 hours. This is a wide range. lets just average it. 2+7/2=4.5 Hours. What do you know? This is what apple quotes.

    Price: starts at 2199 vs 1599 for powerbook.

    Is slower graphics, microscopic screen, $600 (lets not forget the biggest handicap: the ubiquitous Windows XP) worth a pound of weight? Powerbook Killer? Yuk Yuk Yuk, silly grasshopper. Keep practicing though, you are bound to get it right one of these days.

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  50. how are you going to kill something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that is already dead.

    Don't get me wrong, the apple notebooks are nice..but when I think of a [insert name of any computer product] killer. I think of something that has the potential to dethrone something that is already a leader in the market. Given apple's market share, Id say that they are nowhere near the throne.

  51. Obligatory PDA Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, for that price, you could get a low end laptop.

    Oh, wait...

  52. Is it really worth it? by macemoneta · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've just this weekend completed installation of muLinux on an old 25MHz 486SX laptop with 8MB of RAM and a 500MB hard drive that I got for free (because the previous owner thought it was trash). It weights about 4 pounds, and has a TFT color 640x480 screen. I'm now browsing the web, reading email, and SSHing into my server with it. It's very usable.

    I have to wonder why so much perfectly good equipment goes to waste, while people lust after new machines, so that their CPU idle time can go from 99% to 99.5%. Especially among the ./ geeks, who probably have top end machines already.

    Seriously people, if you want to play a game, get a game console. If you want some REAL fun, install Linux with just a floppy drive. :-)

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  53. article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Sony is at it again with a wonderfully designed, elegant and powerful new notebook. Reminiscent of Sony's Vaio C1MW PictureBook, the PCG-TR1A sports an integrated camera at the top of the LCD display. But that's where the similarities end. While the PictureBook was a dull looking laptop, the PCG-TR1A screams style and has a great "Wow!" factor. Due to hit the market July 11th, 2003 this sub notebook will make an impressive impact in the market.

    Weighing in at a mere 3.11 pounds due to the ultra-sleek silvery-white magnesium alloy casing,and sporting a 10.6 inch widescreen format LCD featuring Sony's exclusive XBRITE(TM) display technology, this mini-laptop will satisfy those craving for a stylish travel laptop. Featuring the new 900 MHz Intel Centrino processor for extra long battery life, estimated at 2.5 - 7 hours with the standard Lithium-ion battery, and CD-RW/DVD combo drive makes this laptop perfect for watching DVD's on flights or working as a light, on the go work computer. Coupled with the built in camera, users can snap photos or film videos directly to the 30 GB drive orstream themviawireless networking using the built in 802.11b.

    The PCG-TR1A also comes with various media connectivity options: Two USB 2.0 ports, a Memory Stick© media slot and a Firewire i.LINK® (IEEE 1394) digital port.

    Not only does this subnote come with attractive hardware specs, but packs a punch with the multimedia software packages. Included are DVgate(TM) video editing software for capture and editing of video, and Sony's SonicStage(TM) Mastering Studio software which can be used for converting those old tapes and vinyl to digital audio format.

    Comparable products are Sony's Vaio GT3/K and the Vaio C1MW PictureBook.

    Estimated retail price is a competitive $2000.

  54. Re:One of the most important questions for a subno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    try these guys for repair. http://www.wegenermedia.com

    No affiliation. Just used em before. Great service.

  55. PCG-GRV Comparison by Sim9 · · Score: 1

    Now I could be wrong, but this doesn't seem to have all that much 3d graphics support? Now, the laptop is probably targetted towards a different audience, but I got one of the Sony PCG-GRV 670(?).

    I'm loving its 3d abilities, even though it's extremely heavy and goes through a full battery in about an hour. Of course, few laptops can handle 3d games and rendering like this one ;)

    But it looks like the PCG-TR1A is going to retail for $2000. Sure, it's light, but for a few extra bucks you could get a lot more bang :D

  56. and in other news... by fliptout · · Score: 1

    Oh wait, there isn't any other news..

    Who else is tired of these lame commercials on /.?

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  57. Not a Powerbook killer for that reason... by matt_maggard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like a sony (or maybe any PC) is not a powerbook killer for the reasons listed in the parent comment. I have never had to worry about installing any other Apple OS on any supported machine and I have never had to jump throught these kind of hoops (installing drivers in the right order? for christ's sake!).

    Now, even though I am a long time mac user/proponent, I use PCs at work and the pure usablity gap is decreasing. But when it comes to polish, fit and finish, and total cost of ownership - I just can't see the pc as a good choice for most people. It's too bad that the price sticker at best buy doesn't have to include a breakdown of how much the unit will cost over its lifetime and how much hair you will pull out (sort of like energy costs on appliances).

    Everytime I think of adding an ultralight PC laptop to my home network to run the odd pc app, I read these posts and remember that it ain't worth it.

    And the things cost way more than a 12" PB!

    -matt

  58. Help! by obi · · Score: 1

    Anyone know of something with this or similar formfactor (light/thin/10"-12"), and a decent, linux-supported 3D chip?

    I think there's DRI drivers for the 855 in this sony, but I doubt the chip is a good performer (can anyone shed some light on it?)

    I love this one, or the Toshiba R100 form factor, but I really want some proper 3D in my next laptop.

    1. Re:Help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, the powerbook?

    2. Re:Help! by obi · · Score: 1

      Nope, that's out: it's a Geforce4Go 420, running on a PowerPC chip . There's no PPC Linux drivers for nVidia cards.

  59. Centrtino Linux support? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    I won't buy any workstation or laptop unless it has complete linux support.

    The Pentium4 M is faster than the Pentium4 because it focuses on battery life rather than a larger clockspeed. My 4mhz HP49g is faster than my 12mhz TI89. Intel focuses on increasing clockspeed in its desktops, where people pay attention.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:Centrtino Linux support? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      There is yellowdog linux for the Mac. or are you talking about the Sony.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  60. Well that looks nice.. by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    but sony has an even smaller one out in Japan. Although the specs aren't comparable...I just happen to be biased toward smaller machines myself

  61. Gateway Solo 3450 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you _need_ integrated DVD/R (as in, a docking station won't suffice) this is hardly better (and in some cases, worse) than the Gateway Solo 3450 which came out, lessee... 2 Augusts ago. Nearly 2 years.

    Gateway / Sony
    Chip speed? 750 vs 900.
    Screen size? 12 vs. 10
    Weight?3.00 vs. 3.11
    Camera? well... I suppose if you were actually going to use it...

    Considering that the price of the Gateway 2 years ago was just over $2k, including the docking station, I'm not getting terribly excited about the Sony.

  62. Portable DVD by Slur · · Score: 1

    True, I've never watched a DVD in a coffee shop or on a plane on my iBook. But it comes in handy when I go to a friend's place and we can hook it up to the TV to watch some DVDs. Of course now all my friends have DVD players themselves so....

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  63. Firewire? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Informative

    Knowing Sony, they're probably going to be those crippled (as in no power supply wires) iLink ports. I can't tell from the linked pictures. If so, you can forget about using Firewire to charge an iPod, or using a bus-powered hard drive.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  64. Price by sward · · Score: 1

    (holding pinky to corner of mouth) Two THOUSAND Dollars !!!

    Seriously though: I'll pass.

  65. Catchup?! by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wtf? Sony has had a 10 inch (not 12 inch) entry in the laptop market for years. I've owned mine for almost two years! True there was a gap between the SRX and this thing, but still. It's ridiculous to say that Sony if "following" apple because they released a laptop that's "small" I mean come on. There have been much smaller laptops through history, like the Toshiba Libretto.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Catchup?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why it's the world's first 12" FULL FEATURED laptop

    2. Re:Catchup?! by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Thats why it's the world's first 12" FULL FEATURED laptop

      Oh, because "FULL FEATURED" is totaly not a subjective judgement call...

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    3. Re:Catchup?! by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Easy cheeta. Wipe the spittle off your monitor and compare the spec sheets of the 12" Powerbook and the Viao. Unless you need a much lighter laptop, the Powerbook has better hardware, and is cheaper to boot. So yeah, its safe to say that the other guys are playing "catch up".

  66. Hot? by wonton_mein · · Score: 1

    "Sony has a _hot_ new subnote on its hand" and a possible lawsuit for product safety.

  67. Troll? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Yeah great a Mac user says that Sony is "following" apple, and someone refutes him and gets modded down as a "troll". Mac Zealots are the most annoying people on the planet.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Troll? by Delphiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mac zealots are stupid because they think only Macs are worth paying attention to. Windows zealots are stupid because they don't realize that there are things other than Windows. Linux zealots are stupid because they discount anything that's not Open Source. Conclusion? Zealots are stupid. Sony is not following Apple. Apple didn't invent the small and light notebook. They just did it better than anyone else had to that point. This notebook by Sony is nice but I could get a 12" PowerBook for $1399... loaded with the options I'd want more like $1600-$1700.. still considerably lower than the Sony. The metal case is a bit derivative, but it's got a different look from the PowerBooks and I like it (I like the PowerBooks a little bit more, but that's me).

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    2. Re:Troll? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 0, Redundant

      While I don't entirely agree with the trollmod, his post was sarcastic and called Apple users gay... and he didn't refute the parent, he said he agreed with this one particular point, but that Apple sucks otherwise.

      I don't think this is a case of Mac zeal.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    3. Re:Troll? by VPN3000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I did not call anyone gay. If you sit with your legs crossed and drink lattes, I'll call you feminine. That is not the same thing as gay. Most of the gay people I've known were more the roughneck biker types, not feminine types at all.

      I wasn't being sarcastic as much as I was being realistic. Most Apple products appear feminine.

      Take the colors you can get: cherry, grape, that funny bright orange, etc. Those are colors of feminisity.

      Most products are rounded and bubbly looking, too. Not the more masculine black and silver you see with other products on the market.

      Forgive me for voicing an opinion. I thought that's what forums were all about.

    4. Re:Troll? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yeah great a Mac user says that Sony is "following" apple, and someone refutes him and gets modded down as a "troll". Mac Zealots are the most annoying people on the planet.

      They were until linux zealots appeared...

    5. Re:Troll? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Apple didn't invent the small and light notebook. They just did it better than anyone else had to that point. This notebook by Sony is nice but I could get a 12" PowerBook for $1399

      Well, that's debatable. Like I said I have a 10-inch (and lets not forget that 10 inches is a lot smaller then 12) Sony laptop, and the model that came out just after this had built in wifi and everything. My model also cost $999, which is fantastic for a student. And of course, there's always a steady march of technology, so it may be true that the iBook was "better then anything" at the time, but I doubt it.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    6. Re:Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't being sarcastic as much as I was being realistic. Most Apple products appear feminine."

      I submit to you the latest Apple hardware:

      http://www.apple.com/powermac/gallery/hero.html

      What do the girls look like on your planet?

    7. Re:Troll? by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      Go straight for their badboy machine. What part of 'most' does your brain not handle? Let's compare the power cube, imac, and any assortment of their laptops. Okay, so we are 1 for 4. Next please...

    8. Re:Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, Troll, let's play your sad little game.

      My brain says: 'Most' means 'greater than 50 percent.'

      Your criteria:
      Most products are rounded and bubbly looking, too. Not the more masculine black and silver you see with other products on the market.

      Very well--

      http://www.apple.com/powermac/gallery/hero.html = Masculine
      http://www.apple.com/hardware/powermacg 4/ = Borderline
      http://www.apple.com/imac/ = Feminine
      http://www.apple.com/emac/ = Feminine
      http://www.apple.com/xserve/ = Masculine
      http://www.apple.com/ipod/ = Borderline
      http://www.apple.com/isight/ = Masculine
      http://www.apple.com/xserve/raid/ = Masculine
      http://www.apple.com/ibook/ = Masculine
      http://www.apple.com/powerbook/index17. html = Masculine
      http://www.apple.com/education/emac/ = Borderline
      http://www.apple.com/displays/acd23/ = Borderline

      That's 67% masculine by my count, and even 50-50 if we call all the borderlines feminine. And that's just on the basis of 'bubbly' versus 'rectangular.'

      Oh, by the way, where are your so-called "colors of feminisity" in this lineup?

      "Masculine"? "Feminine"? It's a damn machine.

      Grow up.

      Next.

    9. Re:Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is one sexsay machine.

    10. Re:Troll? by node+3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anti-zealot zealots are stupid.

    11. Re:Troll? by poboxbrian · · Score: 1

      A 12" screen isn't comparable to a 10.4" screen. You mean to compare the Apple to the V505 which incidently is less expensive.

  68. PowerBook 12" what ? by chrispy666 · · Score: 1

    a powerbook killer ??

    Sorry, but even if I'm being redundant, I don't see the point of buying a powerbook just to run linux. it's plain expensive, even for a great looking machine.
    If you buy a Powerbook, that's also for the ease of use and friendliness of OS X. That's why I bought mine, and while I sometimes dual-boot with gentoo-linux on it, most of my time I'm working on OS X.

    If the Sony subnotebook doesn't run OSX, it's not a powerbook 12" killer.

    --
    Music is the language of the heart, the sound of the soul. -Joe Satriani
  69. PCMCIA MIA by rje · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has anyone noticed that it lacks PCMCIA slots? Sure its cool and I'd like one but I sure find it easier to move my digital photos off my compact flash cards with a PCMCIA adapter. Memory sticks don't work in a Nikon CoolPix 5000.

  70. "Powerbook Killer" by patricksevenlee · · Score: 1

    So long as the machine is running Windows, no PC laptop will *ever* be a "Powerbook Killer". The only company capable of making a "Powerbook Killer" is Apple.

  71. Switched! by huntz0r · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seems you forgot the last sentence of your comment... perhaps I can help?

    I'm __________________ and I'm a __________________ .

    (fill the blanks)

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly affected when you come and go, you come and go)
    1. Re:Switched! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I'm lumberjack and I'm a OK?

  72. Now let's be honest here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, those products are available, but the original poster's point was that he already has those programs for Windows, and doesn't want to re-purchase the same product for Mac.
    Right, as if the poster actually purchased all of that software. Sure.
    1. Re:Now let's be honest here by ghjm · · Score: 3, Funny

      Okay, so the original poster's point was that he already warezed those programs for Windows, and the Mac versions are really hard to find on Kazaa.

      Seriously. If Apple went out of their way to create a vibrant warez scene for all the third-party OS X apps, they would sell much more hardware. I've seen worse business strategies.

      -Graham

    2. Re:Now let's be honest here by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 1

      I see your point -- warez is one of the reasons Windows lock-in is so strong -- but if everything developed for the Mac got warezed, nobody would develop for the Mac. And then you wouldn't have a platform.

      Because, kids, you need to always remember the secret to computing dominance... repeat after me...

      "Developers! Developers! Developers!"

    3. Re:Now let's be honest here by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      For the record, the Adobe apps on my Windows box are all paid for.

      As soon as you start running warez, you might as well not have paid for anything on your machine. It's a slippery slope thing, and it opens you to having your whole machine confiscated.

    4. Re:Now let's be honest here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " it opens you to having your whole machine confiscated."

      Are the Warez police going to barge into your home and demand to see your software licenses?

      Unless you are a business, no one cares if you use warez.

    5. Re:Now let's be honest here by dspisak · · Score: 1

      You ever do any work in a media lab? This is not all that uncommon a load of programs to need to use. If anything its on the lower end of the spectrum. If you are doing 3D modeling there is Maya Unlimited which is quite expensive, then you have specialized apps like Apple's Shake 3.0, discreets Combustion is pretty damn affordable nowadays but as short as 2-3 years ago some of the more esoteric higher end applications cost people as much as 20-50k for a piece of software that is now $500-4k in cost.

      However the cost of the software usually pales in comparison to what good DVCAM and DVCPRO50 decks and other various shooting gear will cost you.

    6. Re:Now let's be honest here by rocketfairy · · Score: 1
      I've seen worse business strategies.

      Yeah, there's a website full of them.
  73. I'll take the 12" PB any day over this machine. by whjwhj · · Score: 1

    Sure, the specs on the Sony are nice. But the Powerbook runs an OS that Doesn't Suck. What'ya going to run on the Sony? Windows? Or worse yet, Linux?? See my point?

    When Apple releases a machine with these specs I'll buy it. Sony can release a 20" platinum notebook weighing 1.2 lbs with FW800 and optical and god-knows-what for $699 and I still ain't buying on if I gotta run Windows (or Linux) on the damn thing. No way.

    1. Re:I'll take the 12" PB any day over this machine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone's a reactionary, illiberal zealot.

  74. Re:They're not. by rootofevil · · Score: 1

    with story titles like 'powerbook killer' we dont need to defend ourselves

    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  75. um by toothfish · · Score: 1

    At just 2.9 lbs, the $799 Lindows Mobile PC is a featherweight, but it weighs in with such features as LindowsOS, a 933mhz VIA processor, 256MB RAM, USB 2.0, Firewire, Ethernet, and a crisp 12.1" TFT display, plus a PCMCIA slot to add even more functionality such as wireless networking. No other computer is as ideally suited for carry-around mobility as the affordable, under 3lb, Lindows Mobile PC. You'll find yourself taking it with you everywhere!

    that'd be a VIA processor, there... and $300 more than the $500 price point that was ostensibly being discussed...

  76. Powerbooks are very fashionable by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "For such a small market share they sure do seem to set a lot of standards."
    Too bad taste isn't one of those standards.

    Pay attention to the laptops in TV/magazine/newspaper ads, not to mention TV shows, music videos...and of course movies...by far, Apple Powerbooks are the laptop of choice, and when a movie features a pseudo-screen-graphic, it usually bears a play-skool resemblence to the older MacOS. Oh, and the sounds you hear while Joe Movie Star is working at the computer...is usually either an ancient seagate MFM drive(wee wee...wee wooo weee) or a Macintosh 3.5" drive(Boop boop boop boop boop brrrrp booop boop). The MFM drive sound not surprisingly is more popular in the low-budg films(just kidding :-)

    You have to kind of look closely since they almost always black out the Apple logo(esp on the powerbooks that have glowing apple logos :-), but the case is very distinctive on the G3 powerbooks(the Lombard was code-named after Lombard Street in CA- the curviest street in the world..because almost every surface of the case is curved.)

    In fact, at one point, one of the major fashion magazines many years back said the most fashionable item you could have on you while walking down Wall St. was a Powerbook under your arm(probably where the Wallstreet codename came from). The TiBook continues the trend- they're downright gorgeous machines, at least before the paint starts chipping from the case(which is why Apple is, on new models, using unpainted aluminum external surfaces- the painted exterior of the 15" Tibook did NOT go over very well).

    1. Re:Powerbooks are very fashionable by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 1

      It's odd that you mention this, because I happened to spot the Vaio laptop in question playing a part in Johnny English last night, and wondered, since I was certain the Vaio didn't come *that* small. I also seem to recall a glowing Apple logo somewhere in the movie, but I might have been mistaken.

      I'd be interested to see a side-by-side comparison of this new Vaio and the 12" Apple PowerBook, because I'm really looking at a subnotebook... /me drools

    2. Re:Powerbooks are very fashionable by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      Pay attention to the laptops in TV/magazine/newspaper ads, not to mention TV shows, music videos...and of course movies...by far, Apple Powerbooks are the laptop of choice
      Nowadays, yep. But when the first Vaio came out (PCG-505F), you saw them all over the place. Hell, I bought one. And it's still going strong despite the slow processor (P-233), lack of memory (32mb), low screen resolution (800x600 max), and abysmal battery life (I've never gotten more than an hour or so). I still love it -- it's tiny and purple and I've never had a day's trouble with it.

      If only it had a pointing stick instead of that stupid touchpad.
  77. sub 2.8 pound notebooks from samsung by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    Samsung has been offering ultra-portable notebooks in the UK for sometime now. Take at look at the offerings here.

    Samsung Q20 TLC 1200 (1.3kgs, 2.86 pounds)

    Intel Pentium M Low Voltage processor at 1.2GHz
    Intel 855GM core logic chipset
    12.1 XGA (1024 x 768) TFT display
    Intel Extreme Graphics 2 technology with up to 64MB
    512MB PC-2100 memory
    60GB UDMA hard disk
    16bit SoundBlaster compatible audio
    DVD/CDRW 8xDVD,24xCD-R 10xCD-RW 24xCD (In SliceDock II)
    1.44Mb floppy disk drive (in SliceDock II)
    SliceDock II docking station with removable drives
    Li-Ion Battery with up to 3 hours life
    2 X USB 2.0 ports (+ 2 USB 1.1 ports on SliceDock II)
    1 X Powered 6 pin 1394 port (+ 1 mini 4 pin 1394 port on SliceDock II)
    1 x VGA port (+ 1 on SliceDock)
    Internal 10/100 Ethernet (+ port on SliceDock)
    Internal 56k V.92 modem
    Internal 11Mbit Intel Pro/wireless 2100 LAN (802.11b)
    Integrated 3-in-1 card reader (MMC, SD & Memory Stick)
    Integrated IRDA/FIR
    Microsoft Windows XP Professional
    Symantec Norton Anti-Virus
    MGI videoStudio, photoSuite
    1.299Kg weight
    W273xL234.3xH19.3(min) H23.9(max)

    Note that the DVD/CDRW drive is on the SlickDock.
    Price is ~ 2100 $.

  78. unusable for me by AssFace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't possibly imagine using one of these.

    I am certainly not against Sony, I bought a Vaio for my fiancee. But I personally have no idea how anyone can use one of these things on a daily basis.

    If you have a monitor and a keyboard and a mouse to plug into it so that it is essentially a mobile station that you move about, then that makes sense.

    Of if you have that setup at work for all your uses, but if you travel to a client site you can then bring the little thing with you and use it to do a presentation - you can woo them with the little shiny thing that you brought with you to do it all.

    But I just can't imagine using it, sitting there typing on it and the screen... ugh.
    It would drive me absolutely nuts.

    I have my 15" screen at 1400Xwhatever and a nearly full keyboard on mine and it still is a bit confining for my tastes, but is at least usable.

    I use this at work and at home (at work I have a desktop that I do most of my work on, the laptop is for work that goes with me all the time).
    When I get a new one, I will either get one of the Dells that can do 1600x1200 and has a brighter screen, or I will go to powernotebooks.com and see what I can setup there.

    I'm still trying to wrap my head around why someone would seek out a smaller laptop.
    Easy to carry, lighter, less screen to drive means longer battery life to some extent... but to actually use the damn thing...
    Shows I'm narrow minded I guess.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:unusable for me by LaForce · · Score: 1

      Well, from the perspective of a student, I can say that the weight, at least for me, makes all the difference. When you're out all day on campus and have to walk around with 20-30lbs of the day's course books, notes, etc with you already, a 10lb laptop can seem to make a huge difference. At one point I had given up on carrying a laptop at all for this reason, and then wound up regretting it when I couldn't work on X project because I didn't have a computer with the appropriate software on it (Lab computers are good for some things, but I don't like having to install software every time I get an extra 20 minutes between classes.)

      You do have a point about using it being a bit difficult in the standard configuration of a computer as small as the one in the article, but after jacking up font sizes it actually becomes quite usable. 120% zoom in Opera and Word do nicely. People were once happily using 640x480 on a 15" screen, back in the day, ya know? The keyboard can feel a bit cramped at times, if only because the Lifebook P2000 put the right shift key in an odd spot. After getting used to it, it feels no more cramped than any other laptop I've owned. Losing a bit of screen real estate for the benifit of losing 7lbs is a great thing, IMO. :)

  79. aero-licious by WomensHealth · · Score: 1

    This looks just like my old Compaq aero contura 4/25. Very svelte and a fine performer, at least until Win95 came along. It even runs linux. See the resemblance? http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~hp6y-isym/Aero4_33C.jp g

  80. how the fuck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can it be a powerbook 'killer' when there's nothing to kill. The powerbook rules but goddamn, sony has about 2,000 times the market share.

    Wake up you fuckin douchebags

  81. PCMCIA? by DdJ · · Score: 1

    The 12" PowerBook does not have a PCMCIA slot or other expansion slot at all (must be expanded via USB or FireWire, except for the one entirely-internal CompactPCI slot that can only be used for an AirPort Extreme card).

    Does this thing have an expansion slot other than memory stick? Even if it's memory stick only, that's more than the 12" PowerBook, but if it has PCMCIA as well, that's nifty.

  82. Don't worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've gotten spam for pills to increase "that certain part" by up to 3". I figured that they were talking about the screen.

  83. no regrets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this at CompUSA the other day; I think it was $2099. It's looks pretty nice but I have no regrets buying my laptop for $1749 (from Japan), although the keyboard is a bit cramped, it's a beautiful machine (2lbs!!). If the cd-rom on this thing was swappable with battery or other device, then I might think I made the wrong decision.

  84. Never, ever buy Sony Vaio by Newton+IV · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought two nearly ideantical Sony Vaios (PCG-Z505LS and PCG-R505TS), hoping that ,if one breaks, the other one will be working. No, wrong! In two years, in the Z505LS internal power board had to be replaced, modem jack fell off, and Win 2000 "had bad interplay with VAIO hardware" (this is a quotation from MSFT Customer support). In R505LS, hard drive broke, and firewire jack broke. First computer has been sent to Sony Repair Center 3 times, second- two times. In all 5 cases, the turnover time was very long, and once the notebook arrived unrepaired, so it had to be re-sent. Never again!

  85. only 1024x480 resolution - yuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder they don't list the native LCD resolution in the specifications. How could people use that vertical resolution of 480?

  86. Powerbook killer? by Squidgee · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Powerbook killer? At $200 US more? (The site up there says it will be "$2000")

  87. Sony support by weg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since I've experienced Sony's so called "support" I've decided to never buy a Sony product again. My girl friend had problems with her Sony Vaio FX802, so we sent it in and it came back unrepaired. I had to beg them to pick it up again, btw. the hotline is not free in Austria, even if you still have warranty. This time I added a very detailed description on how to reproduce the error, however, the technician ignored it and called my girl friend to complain in a very harsh tone that the notebook was not defect. I talked to the technician and could convince him that it was in fact defect, and after 3 more weeks we got it back (they exchanged the motherboard). However, when putting it together again, they forgot the screw that fixates the DVD ROM... had to provide one myself. Facit: My girl friend bought a new notbook that was significantly more expensive than others, believing that Sony's support would be better than the support of no-name manufacturers. She ended up waiting 1.5 months for her notebook.. in the meantime, it had of course become significantly cheaper. I'm now thinking about buying an Apple Powerbook. Can anybody tell me about his experiences with Apple's support?

    --
    Georg
    1. Re:Sony support by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Apple's support rocks.

      In the unlikely event that your Mac breaks, if you need a piss while you're waiting for them to repair it they'll have someone hold your dick for you.

      Apple support is very good indeed, especially if you buy AppleCare with whatever machine you get.

    2. Re:Sony support by glopuk · · Score: 1

      At the beginning of the year, my VAIO failed and I phoned Sony - within two days, my laptop had been picked up by the courier and shipped to the european repair center. Got it back, fixed within a week.

      Not bad in my experience.

    3. Re:Sony support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an iBook, and the AC adapter fried out in a power surge. I walked into the apple store, they checked it, walked into the back, and handed me a new one. "Have a nice day" and I was out the door with a new one, no questions asked, no $ paid, under 10 minutes.

    4. Re:Sony support by startled · · Score: 1

      I don't have any experiences with Apple support. I'm just posting to say that yeah-- no way in hell I'd buy anything that could possibly need support from Sony.

      Any cable that could possibly be generic is invariably proprietary. If it breaks or you lose it, good luck getting another from them-- they make it hard to order, and harder to get one under warranty. Installing another OS voids your warranty. In some cases it won't work without a BIOS patch-- which they won't give you if you've voided your warranty.

    5. Re:Sony support by erik_flannestad · · Score: 1

      Apple support is OK; but, short lived. I believe a new Mac only includes 30 days of free support. I won't say that they are trying to blackmail you into purchasing an AppleCare Extended Warranty; but, it's close.

      As far as Sony laptops and personal computers go, I would never purchase one. Sony's "quality control" seems rather, uh, lax. A company I worked for bought their high end laptops for various "VeePs" who deemed them "sexy". I recall one batch of 10 or so of which at least half had to be returned for various defects. This was not atypical. In terms of drivers, it took them ages to support Win2K. Plus, the active life of their various models is about 6 months. Just try getting parts or updated drivers for one after it is discontinued. And don't get me started on their non-standard motherboards and devices. Frankly, it seems that Sony views their computers as an extension of their low end consumer electronics division.

    6. Re:Sony support by Knobby · · Score: 1

      Apple offers support for 30 days, but the hardware is warrenteed for 1 year. We had a bum monitor hinge on one of our PowerBooks that started to act up 4 months after we bought it. Apple overnighted a box, repaired the hinge, and returned it to us in Northern NY in under 4 days. No questions asked, not extended support, just really incredible service.

    7. Re:Sony support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple support assumes that you are dumb so basically tell them it doesnt work and as long as yer still under the warrenty period you get an empty box from airborne express the next day and you put the laptop in there and it goes off to wherever (mine went to texas i think) with free overnight shipping and depending on whats broke and stuff you get it back in a reasonable ammount of time without paying a cent. the display randomly died on my ibook once and this was my experience. my only other time dealing with their support was when my battery mysteriously stopped holding much of a charge. i havent payed anything for apple support/service yet but i'm considering applecare since my warrenty is almost up. have fun laptop shopping!

  88. They're called "Used" by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

    You can pick up a used Vaio or other small notebook for cheap.

    You'll have to upgrade the hard drive to get the specs you want, but otherwise, take a look around. They're out there in great profusion.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  89. Look @ the sharp notebooks by uarch · · Score: 1

    (sorry if I sound like a commercial in this post)

    If you're looking for laptops with 12" screens, take a look at the Sharp Acticus MV series. It has all the features of the other 12" notebooks without the $2000 entry price. (Though its a P3 1.13Ghz machine, not a Centrino)

    I picked up an MV 12 a few months ago and I love it. I would've been disapointed if i went with the Viao r505 and I'm not sure I would've liked the ibm x series over this.

    1" thick, 3.6lbs, built in DVD/CDRW (one of the few 12" machines that doesnt need an external drive), built-in 802.11b (with two black antennas on the sides of the display), 40Gig drive... 256M ram standard.

    Dual boots of linux / XP work flawlessly... No wireless problems, etc...
    After picking up a 2nd mem-module (for a total of 512M ram) it cost $1300 :)

    If you want something even smaller, (and about $150 cheaper) check out the MV10. It's basicly the same machine but the DVD/CDRW is moved to an external adapter

    1. Re:Look @ the sharp notebooks by cel4145 · · Score: 1

      ". . . I'm not sure I would've liked the ibm x series . . ."

      Well, I haven't tried the X series, but am convinced that I would have to get one if buying in the sub-notebook class. We've have sony, dell, and compaq laptop. Then a few weeks ago, my wife got a new IBM T series and it's damn impressive. Has a utilitarian, well-engineered feel that I haven't experienced in a laptop before (reminds me of my Honda). And the titanium case already came in handy. Caught my 40 lb 3 1/2 year old *standing* on it. Didn't hurt it at all :)

  90. Re:One of the most important questions for a subno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one has a native screen resolution of 1280 x 768. You can select a few other resolutions, including 1024 x 768 and 800 x 600. Do so, and you don't get larger/uglier pixels, just pixels chopped off (kept black) to make the display area smaller. (At least that's how it worked when I tried it -- I may have missed a setting.)

    The display is crisp and bright, but the text is very small. Working with it for long periods of time might not be too comfortable.

  91. Yeah, whatever by tknn · · Score: 1

    Try the 2.84 lb. Panasonic W-2, that is a real subnote... Or buy a Mac which is better, don't buy poorly built junk from Sony who also don't even know what customer service is.

    1. Re:Yeah, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looking at that Panasonic, I can see an immediate issue in just typing. Your left palm would damage that CDROM lid pretty quickly. Oh and it costs a million dollars. That too.

  92. I use a Vaio with SuSE 8.2 by jbuilder · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Have you *EVER* tried to load a different OS (as in what did not come originally on the system) nto a Sony Notebook?? You will tear your hair and generally feel like throwing out the notebook...
    /blockquote

    I use a Vaio with SuSE 8.2, and I feel your pain. For the most part my Vaio GRV550 has worked great. And while I'd *like* to get another Vaio and run SuSE on that, I probably won't. Sony makes good notebook PC's, but they don't make *great* ones. To say this new Vaio model could be a "Powerbook killer" is pretty dammed insulting to the Powerbook, considering some of the crap that Sony pulls with respect to incompatible hardware. Also, you're right, they're support is horid if you don't use the OS distro it shipped with.

    And the Centrio chip? How the hell could this vaio be a powerbook killer when the chip in it has essentially limited (read nonexistant) support for any non-MS OS (esp Linux).

    I'm sorry, Sony's going to have to do better or I'm going to look elsewhere - maybe IBM or Dell.

    --
    Polymorphism -- It's what you make of it.
  93. too expensive - ibook for me by mholt108 · · Score: 1

    It is still too expensive. Why cant a PC maker manufacture a decent Sub Notebook for the price of an Ibook. In australia it comes in at 4200 compared to 1800 for an almost exactly configued ibook. the 12" powerbook is cheaper too. come on dell sony acer etal make an affordable sub notebook.

  94. IBM Thinkpad X31 by ed1park · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to share that I got my X31 the other week. Definitely one of the most kick ass laptops I have owned. It may not look as stylish and sexy as the sony or powerbook, but it rocks in useability, functionality, and (surprisingly) affordability.

    I used to feel that if I had to spend my own money on a laptop, I'd get a dell. Toshibas crashed/died after a few years (I supported a dozen or so at work). Sony laptops had driver availability and overall stability problems (maybe better today). But my dell 486dx4 100mhz laptop from 96? is still running, after tons of abuse. Amazing. (My experience has been positive with the latitudes)

    However, I would get an IBM if the company were paying. But to my surprise I found the X31 starting at around $1600. (I remember overpriced Thinkpads that started at 3 grand and up.)

    The keyboard is surprisingly comfortable, the LED keyboard light is useful, and the construction feels SOLID. 4 and 1/2 hour battery life, 1.3ghz, great screen, built in wireless, etc. (only wish it had 802.11g support)

    Some may criticize it's lack of internal CDRW, floppy, etc. But I prefer to keep those power hungry excess weights separate. And to save some money, I'll buy portable external usb/firewire versions from 3rd party companies.

    There is no other notebook for me. I highly recommend it.

    A link to IBM's site.
    http://www-132.ibm.com/webapp/wcs/stores/se rvlet/C ategoryDisplay?catalogId=-840&storeId=1&categoryId =2072542&langId=-1&dualCurrId=73

    Here's a great review at Anandtech. (I never even saw this review until after I got it :)

    http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.html?i=1 80 9

    On a different note, I just have to share that I'm typing this on a 105" WXGA (1360x768) screen. (yes, one hundred and five) Downloaded a bunch of assembly demos over the past few years, and they looked amazing.

    Technology is a wonderful thing. :D

    I only hope that Doom3 and Half life will support 16:9 resolutions natively!

  95. 1900x1200, I believe by beavis88 · · Score: 1

    My boss just got one. In a lot of ways I think it is overkill on a 15-ish inch screen, since you can't readily alter the size of things like menus, buttons, etc, but text does look damn sharp.

    I only wish someone would bring a 1900x1200 external LCD flat panel to market, for less than the cost of the Dell...although honestly, if it was only a 15" I probably wouldn't buy it. I have no idea how much harder it is to make a [physically] larger screen with the same resolution, so I'll stop short of idle speculation...

  96. Linux on Powerbooks-BIG PROBLEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE IS A BIG PROBLEM with Linux on ALL Apple laptops (iBooks, Ti and Al powerbooks), under X Windows the trackpad mouse is EXTREMELY JUMPY. It is basically impossible to control the mouse.

    I tried all sorts of things but nothing works. External USB mice work normally, some of my friends use them. Unfortunalely I HATE external mice. What is the point in buying a laptop if I cannot use the trackpad?. I love the trackpad and hate the conventional mouse, I even use a trackpad with my desktop machine.

  97. Does it run OSX? by TomatoMan · · Score: 1

    No? Then it's no "Powerbook killer" from where I stand.

    --
    -- http://frobnosticate.com
  98. by the way by callmegracie · · Score: 1

    i just wanted to comment that i hate the title of this post.

    --
    p.l.u.r.
  99. Apple 12" Powerbook, portable supercomputer, dead by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    Apple 12" Powerbook, portable supercomputer, dead at 1 year old (give or take)

    I just heard some sad news on the Screen Savers - PPC superstar Apple 12" Powerbook was found dead in its Cupertino home this morning. A new Sony laptop that costs more and is less supported by the Linux community is suspected. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss it - even if you didn't enjoy its parallel cpu work, there's no denying its contributions to popular culture, lickable UIs, battery life and one mouse button. Truly an international/dvorak icon.

    (I really can't be the first to post this, can I?)

  100. -1 Redundant, but I'll post this anyway by tshak · · Score: 1

    The first thing I did w/my PCG-FR130 was blow the installation and install my own copy of WinXP Pro. No problems at all, other than the fact that there was no way to load all of the software that came with the laptop as it detected that it wasn't an "official install".

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  101. My experience with Vaio has been miserable by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Vaios I have seen had what amounted their own version of Windows. They seem to have funky BIOS, hardware, and drivers. In my opinion, Windows Update slowly destroys the machine as these goofball drivers become less and less compatible with the new DLLs you get from Microsoft. I wonder if the word "Vaio" is perhaps Japanese for "disaster"? Sony makes alot of great products, but the Vaio is not one of them. Check Usenet; see just how satisfied the customers really are. Then buy some other brand, any other brand. You really can't do much worse.

    Vaios look cool, and we have a few PHBs who fell in love with the style and (lack of) weight, but they are a total nuisance for the support staff. Our travelling people occasionally gripe about the weight of their IBM Thinkpads, but at least they aren't calling headquarters with show-stopper events in the field.

  102. Deal killer by mildness · · Score: 1
    I saw this today at the Sony store on N Michigan in Chicago.

    The screen was very, very good, readable at 1280x768 and the whole thing was astonishingly light (I have a sub 5 lb Dell with a 12" 800x600 and no optical disc)

    However the lousy chicklet keyboard is a dealkiller for me.

    Cheers,

    Bill

    --
    bamph
  103. A sensible comparison by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
    As others have pointed out, the 10.6" Sony VAIO costs $700 more than a 12" iBook (not PowerBook) even when the iBook is customized to the same specifications as the VAIO.

    However when compared to a comparable 12" PowerBook, the VAIO is about $100 cheaper. For the $100 price difference you get 148MB more memory (Apple doesn't offer 512MB, closest is 640MB) and 10GB more HD.

    The Sony is lighter than both models: iBook(4.9 lbs) PowerBook(4.6 lbs) The VAIO has a built-in camera.

    So the VAIO is comparable. But what makes it a PowerBook killer? Well, what attracts a person to buy a PowerBook. 1) Looks. 2) Ease of use. 3) Snob appeal.

    1) It has a decent look. Clean, simple lines. Personally, I like Apple's PowerBook and iBook better, but that's personal taste.
    2) Here's where it gets tricker. Windows XP is far more stable than its predecessors but it still can't beat an Apple when it comes to out of the box usage.
    3) I don't think Sony has the snob appeal that Apple have. Imagine saying this to someone: "I have a VAIO." It sounds like you a disease. Of course, if you meet anybody who is impressed by a laptop, tackle them and don't let go until the police arrive.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  104. Asus?? by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 1

    Asus has this offering which is intriguing although it is a 13.3". What makes it so intriguing is that it is dirt cheap in comparison the Dell/IBM/Mac/Sony...It's priced at $699 and has nice specs:
    -4.8 hours
    -1.9 Kg in weight, 22mm in thickness (if i were smart i would translate that to inches/lbs for your lazy ass)
    -4X USB2.0
    -Centrino
    -It's not ugly like most HP's/Toshibas
    If anyone has experience with this laptop, do tell. Sounds too good to be true.

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
    1. Re:Asus?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barebones Laptop, Requires CPU,Hard drive, Wireless card, OS to Operate.

      Not the most helpful comparisson. Idiot.

    2. Re:Asus?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks pretty cool, but Asus gots no street credibility in the Notebook game, kinda like Kobe Bryant...Doh!

    3. Re:Asus?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to click on the right Reply link. Idiot.

  105. It's portability, not compatibility by indros13 · · Score: 1
    At the urging of my Apple-owning friends, I recently acquired an older iBook to mark my entry into the Apple and laptop markets. Software compatibility was not really an issue, as the purpose of my Windows desktop (games, P2P) is completely different from my laptop (office, email, chat, sit on my fat ass on the futon and surf the web). Networking to share files is really easy, so I can transfer documents, address books, etc, without a problem.

    Point being, don't worry about running the same OS on both. A laptop's function is being portable, not replacing a desktop.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  106. But we all know what Centrino means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux will not run on this thing, unlike the 12" Powerbook. And I would never buy a computer that does not let me run linux on it. Admittedly, the 12" PB is not that great for linux, due to lack of good support for the nvidia graphics card and airport extreme. The iBook and 15" PB do however run linux quite nicely, with all the hardware supported, sometimes even better than on PC's (at least for power management). In fact, I am using an iBook running linux right now.

    1. Re:But we all know what Centrino means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Centrino=hype?
      a la MMX

  107. It's very cute. by mosch · · Score: 1
    This thing is lovely, it's very cute, but I don't see how it's even in the same market as the PB12.

    I could see carrying one of these around as a spare laptop, y'know, in case shit. But I can't imagine that many people would want to use a 10" laptop on a regular basis.

    Cool product, but dear god slashdot, you've outdumbed yourselves.

    1. Re:It's very cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see carrying one of these around as a spare laptop, y'know, in case shit.

      Do you carry around an extra 3lbs of clothing, y'know, in case you shit your pants?

    2. Re:It's very cute. by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1
      I can't imagine that many people would want to use a 10" laptop on a regular basis.

      I hope it's more than the number of people who would use a 17" laptop...

  108. Difference between note books by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    The only difference between a Sony notebook and a Sony PC is that the notebook will go further when you get so pissed at their quirks you through them out the window Windows and all! (-::-) smilin' Siamese twins. 0-::-) one bought Apple the other bought Sony! Guess which is which?

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  109. Apple Vs. Sony, price by price by UnixRevolution · · Score: 2, Informative

    the new sony:

    900MHz Centrino
    512MB Memory
    30GB Hard drive
    802.11b
    10.6" TFT
    3.11 Pounds
    ~$2000

    867MHz PowerPC G4
    640MB DDR266 (128MB built-in & 512MB SO-DIMM)
    40GB Ultra ATA drive
    SuperDrive (DVD-R/CD-RW)
    AirPort Extreme Card
    Keyboard/Mac OS for SuperDrive - U.S. English
    12.1-inch TFT Display
    $2048

    128MB more memory, 10GB more hard drive, faster processor (almost even on bare clock speed, even!) and has OS X with UNIX goodness out of the box, and a larger display by more than an inch. for about $48 more.

    and this is a powerbook killer how?

    sure, the apple is a bit heavier, but 4.6 pounds is still damn light. Also, do you think the sony really is going to last 7 hours on a battery? i know my 14" ibook has lasted more than 6.

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
  110. Take the cheap route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want a sleek sub-notebook but you're not a recent state Lotto winner?
    Take an ego hit, settle for the Dell Latitude L400 & get yourself a wifi Nic. Problem solved w/ 3.4lbs, $600.

  111. Libretto L2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any of Toshiba's asia-only Libretto line.. there is a sexy, killer machine. Just imported one for my gf.. freaking insane laptop for $700.

  112. Apple support by cosyne · · Score: 1

    My friend has a tibook, and when his power adapter thingie somehow got a hole in the cord, they were apparently very nice about replacing it, esp when he mentioned he had apple care.
    If you have a dead pixel, thought, forget about it. Apple doesn't consider pixels defective when they dont do what theyre supposed to, just 'anomolous'. You need a bunch of 'anomolies" before its a defect. I had one on an iBook. No such problem on the armada i had before or the lifebook i have now. I realize it's kinda luck of the draw, but by the time i pay close to $1800 for a laptop (w/ drive, memory, applecare, etc), I want it to work, dammit.

  113. Apple cringes in fear... by Nijika · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Uh, yeah. It looks like a Powerbook, and it's 12", this obviously spells DOOM for the whole line. Right. Anyway, like between September and November probably, we're going to see more G5 products being rolled out, and I wouldn't be surprised if there's a Powerbook in there.

    Killer? We haven't seen the tip of the iceberg yet. Come 2004 I'll be posting from my 64 bit notebook. I'm sure I won't take a second look at this Sony after today.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  114. Can they deliver? by The+Apocalyptic+Lawn · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a nice thing, but the last few months we've had some serious trouble ordering Sony equipment. A digital videocamera (DCR-TRV33e) took two months before it arrived, and we just cancelled an order for a Vaio Z1-SP because after two months there was still no hope of it ever being delivered. Their supplier only received two of them, ever.

    A friend of mine waited for eight months before he cancelled an order for his Sony stereo. My guess is that the mainstream, most profitable items are easy to get, but the fancier stuff is produced only once.

    Thank you so much for making us drool, but not delivering, Sony.

    --
    't used to be LawnMOWER, really...
  115. Something must be wrong... by Moofie · · Score: 1

    I thought Apples were supposed to be more expensive than similarly-capable PCs.

    Quick, get Jobs on the phone and have him raise the price!

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  116. Looks? by Bud · · Score: 1

    Quoting the designtechnica article: the PCG-TR1A screams style and has a great "Wow!" factor.

    My take on this is: screaming never got you anywhere.

    Frankly, this notebook doesn't measure up to "good style". The proportions are all wrong, the bulbous underside looks odd, and there are small buttons and connectors all over it just shouting "this is a gadget". There are some stylish Vaios in the Sony product portfolio (e.g. the Z1), but this one is clearly targeted towards those who care more about having camcorders in their subnotebooks.

    Besides, does this Vaio run Mac OS X? No? Ooooohhh... the viability factor just fell off the cliff... :-)

    --Bud

  117. 900MHz??? by spike+it · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be cheaper to upgrade an old laptop and buy a webcam for $20?

  118. you work for Sony? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    This is the second post you've made with the same assertions. Unless weight is your primary concern, the Powerbook is the one with the decidedly better hardware.

  119. Same weight, better spec... by hol · · Score: 1
    I am so tired of people claiming Sony as the only innovator on the market. Sharp has been making small systems for some time, I have had an older one, works fine with windows and linux, all-metal cases on some models, and the screens are orders of magnitude better than anything I have ever seen on a Sony. No, they don't do big volumes in the States. Did I mention they are substantially cheaper?

    Try these, just to compare:
    Sharp UM Series
    (runs Linux, http://www.people.virginia.edu/~hz5p/laptop.html)
    • Entry level models are sub-$1000
    • 3.07 lbs
    • Bigger disk in the higher-end models
    • No integrated cdrw - buy an aftermarket one if you need one for the road
    • Yeah, outdated Pentium 3 technology. Read the reviews - it beats some of the castrated P4 notebooks you see (ok but not the P4M a.k.a. Centrino minus the wifi)
    • Bad-ass extended battery for 7 hours claimed life
    • Compact-flash slot integrated ... kinda neat


    If you need lighter, try the MM10

    • 1 Ghz Transmeta chip (go rooting for the underdog)
    • Nifty sync-up thingy for another pc if this is not your main one
    • All the wifi goodies
    • $1500 or so
    • Probably runs Linux too


    No, I don't work for sharp, and at times I think their service sucks (mainly the beef is with aftermarket parts for an older model), but at least I have confirmed that there is existent service, both warranty and non-warranty.

    Bah, Sony.
    --
    - - - Non Caffeine Drink or Drink Error
  120. Yeah I was gonna mention... by scosol · · Score: 1

    Gee- I bought this machine over a year ago when it was called a Fujitsu P2040.
    Yesh, there are some minor differences but as the parent linked, the new P5000 series from them is the latest.

    I paid $1300 back then, and am typing on it right now... :)

    --
    I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.
    1. Re:Yeah I was gonna mention... by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      Same here - I've had my 2046 (though it's now pracitacally a 2040 because I removed the wireless card) for over a year.

  121. No, because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "wouldn't you expect the Mac-heads to defend themselves?"

    Why would criticism of apple's hardware make apple customes defend apple?

    If you sit back and think about it, that's about the dumbest thing you could think of.

  122. Apple Support by Phat_Tony · · Score: 0

    I can tell you about my experiences with Apple's support, but first let me tell you that for umpteen years in a row, including most recently a few months ago, Apple has come out #1 in Consumer Report's ratings both for machine reliability and customer support, against Dell, Gateway, HP, etc. Dell usually gets second.

    As for anecdotal evidence:

    I recently moved my Mother to an eMac. She works from home and types all the time. About once or twice a week, she was having a sticky key/key repeat problem. Sometimes it was the "delete" key, and she'd look up and the cursor was crawling backwards across the screen deleting her work.

    I didn't know if it was hardware or software, so to take a guess at it I first reinstalled the OS and Word, which didn't fix it. So I switched the USB keyboard with my girlfriend's, and my Mom didn't have any trouble for a few weeks.

    So I called Apple. It's about 7:00 PM Eastern Time on a Thursday. I'm on the phone with a human in maybe 4 minutes. He's friendly. And I'm like: "I think I have a hardware program with the keyboard. Sometimes a key repeats. I switched keyboards, and the problem seems to have gone away."

    "OK, we'll send you a new keyboard. Give me a minute to set this up."

    One minute later...

    "OK, we'll ship this to you today at [reads address]. Is that correct? Anything else I can help you with? Well, you should see that tomorrow."

    "Tomorrow?"

    "Yep."

    The keyboard was in Ohio from Cupertino the next morning. It arrived about 14 hours after I got off the phone. Nothing about sending the old one back. Nothing about making me go through some troubleshooting. No paperwork. Hardly any time on hold.

    My mom hasn't experienced the repeat problem for months now with the new keyboard.

    So that's what it's like.


    As an interesting side note, my girlfriend's never had any trouble with the old keyboard either, which is a much nicer keyboard than the one that came with her old G4 350. It must have been some odd conflict.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  123. But you STILL have to run Windows... by akac · · Score: 1

    or Linux. I guess if its Linux you're after its great. But the reason people buy Apple machines is because of OS X. Think of it. Full UNIX. Yet a usable GUI. Common applications.

  124. Mod parent, "-1, Ignorant Fucktard" by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    From Investor's Business Daily, July 15:

    "Things are brighter in the U.S. consumer notebook PC segment. Apple's unit market share rose from 0.3% to 6.8% in the two years. And its share of the market based on dollars spent rose from 0.2% to 8%."

    Apple has a 6.8% share of the laptop computer market. The most recent market share numbers I could find for eveyone else show that nobody has more than 15%, so 6.8% is nothing to sneeze at. Those same numbers show Sony in fifth place, with a 7.1% market share.

    I expect Apple's piece of the laptop market pie to keep getting larger. Why?

    -People are getting sick of Microsoft licensing, and Windows security holes, and Windows spyware/viruses to the point where they're willing to try something different.
    -Apple's laptops have been feature-rich and very price competitive for the last few years, and the more polished OS X becomes, the more heads it turns.
    -People who want a UNIX laptop seem to prefer just buying a PowerBook/iBook instead of dicking around trying to get something other than Windows to run well on an Intel-based laptop.
    -The "I'd rather build my own using dirt-cheap parts" crowd doesn't count in the laptop market because you can't easily build your own laptop.
    -The gamer crowd doesn't count either, because the high-end Wintel laptops their games need are not cheap, and upgrading the video hardware after a while is difficult to impossible.

    The playing field is just a lot more level in the laptop market, so eventually the company that makes a functional, innovative, well-supported machine (even if it is a few dollars more) will float close to the top of the market share rankings.

    ~Philly

  125. Video card? by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    What kind of video card does this powerbook killer have in it? My Dell has a 64mb Geforce4, hope this thing has something 'killer' as well.

  126. New Vio by iroger · · Score: 1

    No OSX? Hardly a powerbook killer.

  127. apple support by zarqman · · Score: 1

    my experiences have been pretty good with apple's support. i've had three issues in the (almost) year i've had my ibook.

    1) the battery was doa. i decided to deal with it through the dealer i bought the computer from. bad idea. dealer was helpful, but apparently, apple doesn't back up their dealers as well as they could, giving themselves and their apple stores priority over their dealers. it did get taken care of, no cost to me, but it took about a month. lesson learned: go to apple direct.

    2) at about 5 months, the backlight went out. called apple direct. was a busy day as i was on hold for about 20 min (still better than most of the other pc outfits i've dealt with in the past). after 5 or 6 minutes of troubleshooting, they agreed it needed to be sent in. box was at my door the next morning. i had it back in my hands in less than one week -- can't ask for more when it had to go in. ended up being a power supply problem that quit powering the backlight. odd, but no problems since.

    3) a couple months after that, my battery had suddently toasted itself -- was getting less than half the life out of it i was getting just a month earlier. this was widespread enough that it was talked about on macslash and here on /. (and on apple's forums). called and got right through. first tech didn't really listen to what i said, but asked me to do a few things that would take a few hours and call back (run it down, blah blah blah). rather than fight really hard, i just did it and called back. got right through again. next tech promptly agreed to replace it. this was about 4:00pm. had it on my door by 10:00am the next day.

    all said, i obviously haven't had perfect experiences, but i really don't have anything to complain about. always deal directly with apple, and if you get the occasional tech that doesn't quickly do what you want, just move along to another one. unlike most outfits, apple appears to have more good ones than bad ones. oh, and i do have applecare.

    --
    geek friendly VPS's and free API enabled DNS : zerigo.com
  128. Once bitten, twice shy. by mikerich · · Score: 1
    it sacrifices some features and some value in trade for improved portability.

    And that was sadly my problem with the VAIO Z 505, it made too many sacrifices with its external floppy, external CD drive (nice to see this one has it included), big power block, port replicator and so on. So instead of carrying a small computer, you lugged round a whole load of extras. But it was a cute machine.

    I went off the VAIO when it came to upgrading memory, not only was it extortionately expensive, but Sony had crippled the machine. It could take (and hold on to your seats here) 96Mb of RAM, but thanks to a crappy motherboard, if you installed any more than 64Mb it slowed down!

    The final straw came when I couldn't put up with Windows 98 any longer and wanted a more robust OS. Sony's insistance on doing things their way (ie. via a custom install disk that only supported 98) made things far more complicated than they need be.

    As a word of warning, beware of Sony's habit of pulling technical support (such as drivers) from their Web sites as soon as a model is replaced. Getting software for older VAIOs can be tricky.

    So if you want a PC laptop, this looks very nice, but I won't be joining you this time round.

    Best wishes,
    Mike.

  129. weak Sony laptop warranty service and durability by call+-151 · · Score: 1
    For laptops, durability and warranty service are important considerations. For desktops, 99% of problems can be handled by swapping out and replacing with commodity hardware, so it doesn't matter nearly as much. But for laptops, those little tiny pieces of plastic that break can
    keep your machine from being useful at all, and waiting on the phone and for repairs can be agonizing if you are one of those people who cannot be without a computer. The problem is that it is hard to gauge durability and warranty service at purchase time, so flimsy computers with great specs look attractive but turn out to be a massive headache. Unfortunately, such computers sell well unless people know that durability and service are such an important part of a laptop.


    On this front, Sony laptops are trouble, based upon my experience with several PCG-Z*** machines. Sony's service model is awful- they do not distribute parts (even the screws on the bottom that continuously fall out) to dealers, so even the most minor repair means a hassle. Specifically, it means waiting on the phone with bozos in Florida, sending it back to Sony in California, calling Texas a few dozen times to check on the status of your repair, and the end result is that you are laptop-less for weeks. It says a great deal about Sony's attitude if they think it is reasonable for someone to be without their computer for six weeks. This wouldn't be such a big deal if the tiny Vaios that are so attractive weren't so flimsy that stuff is breaking on them all the time. It got to be so bad that we would suffer through multiple failures until finally the machines became so unusable that it was worth going through their service to fix the 5 things or so that had broken.


    Contrast that with Apple- they have lots of capable places where people can fix your machine while you wait (don't get me started about how amazing the Powerbook triage unit at Tekserve in Manhattan is...) and if you have to send it back, they do a great job turning things around pronto. They know that not having your computer is a big deal and do a lot to minimize the time you are without it.


    I've given up on the Sonys, particularly for my graduate students, who are harder on their machines than I am. I switched from the Sonys to iBooks and have found iBooks amazingly durable and Apple's service model far superior.
    Since our killer aps are 'vi' and 'gcc', either platform can work fine and the iBooks have been troopers so far.


    I have heard that the TiBooks are not as study as iBooks, but I don't have first-hand experience with them. I found the iBooks very good bang for the buck and will stick with them until convinced otherwise...

    --
    It's psychosomatic. You need a lobotomy. I'll get a saw.
  130. Mobile phones? by gutu · · Score: 1

    If this is ultra-light weight laptop on the road, how come it doesn't have infrared nor bluetooth?

  131. My guess on why nobody's done it... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    The expensive part of a laptop computer isn't the process, hard drive, ram, or video card. Those are all pretty cheap standardized components. The most expensive component on the laptop is the LCD screen - and that is the one thing that would remain the same on the "stripper" laptop.

  132. Still too heavy by mazor · · Score: 1

    I own a Sony Vaio Picturebook from 3 years ago, and even with the larger screen and built-in networking advancements they've made since then, I'm still waiting for a new Vaio to beat my old one.

    This new Vaio is heaver (3.1 vs 2.2 lbs) and has less battery life than my Picturebook (7 hours on double battery). I also prefer the torque-stick cursor device over the touchpad.

    Not good enough.

    -mazor

  133. OS X Graphics by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

    I dual boot Debian unstable and OS X Jaguar on my TiBook 800. The only thing impressive about OS X's graphic capabilities is that I can get playable FPS on Medal of Honor, but then that isn't much of a testament to Aqua. If you really find that XFree86 is slower OS X then there is something grossly misconfigured on your system.

  134. You're on to something there! by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

    If OS X is worth what so many here seem to think it's worth I'd buy two OS-less Apple laptops...

  135. the sony by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    I'm typing this on an Apple iBook with Debian/Sid. Everything works.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.