Slashdot Mirror


China Sends First Taikonaut To Space

tuxlove writes "Space.com reports that China has just successfully launched its first manned space mission. "Blasting off from a remote space base in the Gobi Desert atop a Long March 2F rocket, a single Chinese astronaut named Yang Liwei is on his way to circle the planet every 90 minutes aboard the Shenzhou 5 spacecraft. As a result, China has become only the third nation on Earth capable of independently launching its citizens into orbit. " Perhaps this will kick the US space program back into gear?" aerojad points to this Reuters report, about which he says "The article is short on details, aside from 'Xinhua said the craft carried astronaut Yang Liwei, 38. The launch on Wednesday, 42 years after the Soviet Union put the first man into space, marked a milestone for China's secretive space programme, which analysts say has its sights set on a manned mission to the moon.' The mission is due to end in 21 hours." zxm adds a link to China Daily's coverage, and puiwah to a story on MSNBC.

915 comments

  1. I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "China Sends First Takeout To Space"

    1. Re:I misread the headline as... by jobbleberry · · Score: 2, Funny

      > "China Sends First Takeout To Space" Well actually I think they already sent a Dog ... so that would be pretty close.

    2. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That would be Korean, you insensitive clod

    3. Re:I misread the headline as... by fenix+down · · Score: 1, Troll

      Great. I guess we can expect 500 comments full of a combination of racism and idiocy.

      A brief summary: Takeout joke blah blah blah stupid MSG joke blah blah blah somebody confusing Korea and China and making a dog-eating joke blah blah blah something so goddamn offensive I can't even think of it, but it'll happen blah blah blah communism is bad blah blah blah communists don't care if they die blah blah blah militarizing space blah blah blah this something about libertarians or Ayn Rand blah blah blah does it run Linux blah blah blah Bush is gonna declare war on China blah blah blah one or two people who actually know what the fuck they're talking about but are so hopelessly drowned out by racist non-humor that I'll never read them.

      Nice work, Slashdot!

    4. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seemed to take care of most of the derogatory items in your post. Nice work, Jackass!

    5. Re:I misread the headline as... by hazem · · Score: 1

      You know...

      I don't like to go to the mall. Lots of people just milling around with no purpose, high prices, irritating music. It's all really irritating and probably bad for my health.

      But, I don't go hang out there and then complain about how I don't like it there.

      If Slashdot is so irritating to you, I recommend you go look for one of the other millions of websites on the internet. There has to be some out there that don't upset you - you'll probably live longer!

    6. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasn't Russia/USA already sent ape's into space? What's the point now? Think of all the tree hugging hippies that will go APEshit at another dead monkey?

    7. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doggies are cute. I love doggies. Don't hurt my doggie-woggie.

    8. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like doing bitches doggy style - especially those on heat. Purr!

    9. Re:I misread the headline as... by AstroDrabb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Noooo, the Chinese like rats while the vietnamese eat dogs

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    10. Re:I misread the headline as... by shut_up_man · · Score: 4, Funny

      That thought got me thinking...

      "Japan Sends Giant Robot Piloted by Cute Schoolgirl Into Space"

      "New Zealand Sends Sheep Into Space"

      "USA Sends Iraq Into Space"

      "French Send Jerry Lewis Into Space, Then Return Him Safely"

      "Germans Launch Brewery Into Space, Aliens Impressed"

      "Australians Would Send Man Into Space, But Instead Got Drunk and Went Fishing"

      "England Sends Own Cricket Team Into the Sun"

      etc...

    11. Re:I misread the headline as... by igorxa · · Score: 1

      um, but there are some parts of china where dog is eaten. i have a friend in china right now teaching english, and he's had dog, twice.

    12. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      am I the only person here who finds this ever so slightly offensive?

    13. Re:I misread the headline as... by mr_sas · · Score: 1

      at least it'd stop the ozzies getting the ashes i guess.

    14. Re:I misread the headline as... by borgdows · · Score: 1

      "French Send Jerry Lewis Into Space, Then Return Him Safely"

      no thank you... really, you can keep him where he is.

    15. Re:I misread the headline as... by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      There are some parts of America where cows are eaten. Shocking!

      I don't get how people can get so squeamish about eating one animal but not another.

    16. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... Yes, you are.

    17. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The soviets originally sent a dog, to which the US responded by sending a chimp (IIRC).

      The original space race involved the soviets getting the first satellite, the first living creature (the dog) and the first man into space. Which is probably part of why the US provided political backing for sending people to the moon.

      So it'll probably take a lot more than China starting to replicate what has already been done before it'll motivate US politicians to give more funding to NASA...

    18. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'm not defending the post you were responding to, unfortunately people do end up having to go to places they don't like...

      Consider a hypothetical situation - assuming you're a guy, say you have a girlfriend who likes to go shopping for clothes, make-up etc. Now it would be fine for you to tell her she can do that on her own time, but say you live closer to the kind of places she likes to visit and happen to have a car...

      Just try to tell her that you don't want to take her shopping.

    19. Re:I misread the headline as... by MrBlint · · Score: 0

      I fail to understand the bond between you and your subservient quadruped.

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
    20. Re:I misread the headline as... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Check this out:

      > The menu for his flight included freeze- dried shredded pork with garlic sauce and fried rice, and he brought along a sleeping bag for naps, state television said.

      --Damn, that sounds good - now I'm hungry for Chinese food...

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    21. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people are a bunch of hypocritical assholes. Only low-life scum-sucking jackasses will rant about dog-eating while chewing down on a cow.

    22. Re:I misread the headline as... by ViolentGreen · · Score: 0

      It's purely psychological. Dogs are traditionally "Man's Best Friend." Most people grow up close to and loving dogs. Eating a type of animal that you have been close to is a real turnoff. Many vegetarians extend this to all animals.

      It's not too far fetched to extend your argument to eating humans, although there is the same species thing. Humans are animals after all.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    23. Re:I misread the headline as... by nucrash · · Score: 1

      Umm... no it wouldn't be Korean, Dog is eaten in many Asian countries, from as far North as Korea and Mongolia, to as far south as Vietnam, that I can verify with locals. The locals being from Vietnam, Korea and China. Mongolia is just assumed, but hell if it was as cold as fuck I would be eating anything I could too.

      And do the the stupidity of my own canine, I think I will serve him up with some rice and veggies. Let me know if you want any as well

      --
      Place something witty here
    24. Re:I misread the headline as... by jdray · · Score: 1

      Some years back, I changed my diet to where the only meat I eat is fish. People often ask me why I draw the line there. I can't really explain it. Kinda weird, huh?

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    25. Re:I misread the headline as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funniest slashdot post EVER!

      roffle limmow etc..

    26. Re:I misread the headline as... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Because Fish are Kosher/Halal and can't feel pain. They supposedly don't have that part of the brain, though that is in dispute between animal activists and fishermen.

  2. Congratulations! by panserg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's good to see one more nation in the space. Go China!

    --
    "I shall explain this by waving my hands about in an appropriate manner." -- Cambridge University Math Dept.
    1. Re:Congratulations! by strateego · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but real Congratulations are in order if their rockets, and command center software run linux.
      [runs and ducks]

    2. Re:Congratulations! by c1ay · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see them get some use out of the technology Wilheim Von Klinton sold them for campaign funds. With this test out of the way they'll be able to fine tune their ICBMs now. Maybe Hitlery can get a down payment on her campaign now!!!

      --

    3. Re:Congratulations! by hitchhikerjim · · Score: 1

      ...and can you imagine a beowulf cluster of these!?!

    4. Re:Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This coming from a guy writing his comment on a computer made in China.

    5. Re:Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Hopefully a little competition will kick start NASA into actaully landing someone on the moon this time. None of that hokey-pokey tomfoolery.

    6. Re:Congratulations! by panserg · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many people on /. have computer WITHOUT ANY even a single piece made in China? 0%?

      --
      "I shall explain this by waving my hands about in an appropriate manner." -- Cambridge University Math Dept.
    7. Re:Congratulations! by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      That'd be called a nuclear war...

    8. Re:Congratulations! by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 1

      Not if we teach it the game of tic-tac-toe!

      --
      We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
    9. Re:Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how many people have a computer that is made entirely in China?

      100%, since Taiwan is part of china ;)

    10. Re:Congratulations! by Zugok · · Score: 1

      kind of reminds me of a line from Deep Impact or Armageddon...whatever...when they meet up with a Russian cosmonaut at the Mir(?). Then something hardware goes horribly wrong and the cosmonaut says something along the lines of "it doesn't matter American harware, Russian hardware, everything made in Taiwan"

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    11. Re:Congratulations! by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      actually, they're mostly using russian technology

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    12. Re:Congratulations! by ces · · Score: 1

      Whoa dude, methinks you need to up the prozac dosage a tad and stay off freerepublic.com.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    13. Re:Congratulations! by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping for a triumphant, safe return to Earth and many more safe, successful missions. Congradulations, China! Good job...

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    14. Re:Congratulations! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      "Shit, we better hurry up and get those flags up there, like we showed on TV, before the Chineese get there!"

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    15. Re:Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely! In a world where some countries pride themselves on the amount of terrorists it produces, China shows the world it's progress by sending a man to space! Way to go China, and good luck on your future space endevours!

    16. Re:Congratulations! by jdray · · Score: 1

      You joke, but your statement has some kernel of truth! [more running, more ducking]

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  3. Welcome by VertigoAce · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the Space Race!

    1. Re:Welcome by chadm1967 · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the space race? Uhhhhhh, that was about 40 years ago.

    2. Re:Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What race? We NASA weren't in it.

      Seriously, I left NASA when I realized it had accomplished very little last twenty years. And I could see why, while working there.

      Well enough bitching. An important question now is this: where do we go from here?

      -b

    3. Re:Welcome by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      Mabey China will be smart enough to start mining asteroids for materials in the near future, that should give the US a good kick in the ass to get it's space program moving along again.

      --
      stuff
    4. Re:Welcome by pyrrho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Race never ends. And we have not lapped anyone, because we stopped advancing. The shuttle, while cool, gives us no advantages over a Chinese rocket based program.

      They will catch up quick. In fact, they are basically all caught up as of today. China doesn't have to build a shuttle to catch... in fact, they and the ISS are slowing US down... so those things are going to make it easier for China to catch up.

      China is saying "space science is still important". We can agree or disagree, but we can't sit on our laurels and expect it to last long.

      --

      -pyrrho

    5. Re:Welcome by den_erpel · · Score: 1
      they and the ISS are slowing (the) US down


      How is the ISS slowing the US down. Fact of the matter is that the US is not willing to pour lots of money into an expensive program which does not yield any direct revenue (which is basically the same reasoning the EU and Russia is following).

      I would rather think that the ISS is one of the first programs that _really_ helps space exploration forward: not only does it provide a good permanent base in space for continuous research, but more importantly, it finally unites a large part of the space travelling world in one program (out of pure financial need). I don't know about you, but I would call this one of the major achievements of the ISS.

      And yes, I've been to the Cape Canaveral and I was ashamed of the language some of the engineers (people that you would expect to have a decent education, but perhaps they were deliberately screened out to give tours) were using: basically cold war talk and pure propaganda (we do not have the lead in commercial launchings but we have a firm resolve to get this in the first years).

      I hope that ISS helps showing that together we can achieve more out there than alone (yes, I've been raised with a weekly Star Trek dose).
      --
      Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
    6. Re:Welcome by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Succinct, to the point, and appropriate. I hope the Chinese will want to help us with the ISS.

      --
      The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
    7. Re:Welcome by Bohnanza · · Score: 1

      Mabey you can name a material available in asteroids that's not available more cheaply and safely on earth.

      --

      -----

      Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

    8. Re:Welcome by PW2 · · Score: 1

      >> How is the ISS slowing the US down.

      I've heard that the IIS is circling at a much lower orbit than the US was hoping for. Since the US is paying for much of the project, resources that would have been upgrading technology are now used up to keep the IIS from crashing.

    9. Re:Welcome by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      I'm an original space fanboy.

      I love the space station. But it's orbit is too low. We need a construction platform in space, which we don't have. I do think the international cooperation is great. I don't think the money is all wasted.

      But it slows us down because it's a big drain on resources. My point is just this... consider we raced the Chinese in their goal to have a manned moon base. Would we use the shuttle or ISS. Nope. Of no use. We'd have to go back to the Apollo rocket. And that's what I'm talking about. The shuttle and ISS are brute force solutions to problems that don't quite exist. That's how they slow us down, by giving us the impression we have a big lead, when we really have big drains on resources that do not make space easier to get to and from and use.

      --

      -pyrrho

    10. Re:Welcome by jdray · · Score: 1

      Like water? It costs about US$20,000 per gallon at the space station.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  4. The tricky part by elliotj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    China has become only the third nation on Earth capable of independently launching its citizens into orbit.

    That's nice and all, but isn't the tricky part bringing them back?

    Let's see what happens in 21 hours.

    1. Re:The tricky part by Omerna · · Score: 1

      Not for China... they seem to have a relatively low regard for life (compared to the U.S. and other space-faring nations) so I'd bet getting them up is/was more important than getting them back.

      --


      No sig for you.
    2. Re:The tricky part by Flamerule · · Score: 4, Informative
      Not for China... they seem to have a relatively low regard for life (compared to the U.S. and other space-faring nations) [...]
      Yeah.
      so I'd bet getting them up is/was more important than getting them back.
      Nope. For the Chinese, a large part of the value in this space launch is its propaganda value. In that light, having their first man in space die on his way back would be disastrous. It would make them look incompetent, compared to the USSR's and the US' first manned launches.
    3. Re:The tricky part by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Eh, not entirely. Like with aircraft, the most dangerous bit tends to be launch and landing. (Note that of the three cases of fatalities, one was on the launch pad (for a test, but I'd say it still is indicative), one was just after launch, and the final was on landing.) Landing tends to be most coasting/parachuting, which is relatively easy to do right. In fact, you can make it very safe by clever design of the module. (I believe that the Mercury and Apollo capsules were actually designed to always tend to re-enter in the correct orientation.)

      Launch is more dangerous in some ways if only because you've got X tons of very flammable (dare I say explosive?) materials under your butt. A slip-up there will tend to be much harder to fix or escape from.

    4. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice and all, but isn't the tricky part bringing them back?

      Not really, if something goes wrong, there's probably one (in the immense Chinese population) that has the same name and same face as the taikonaut that went up there who'll face the media. A little switcheroo and nobody would notice.

    5. Re:The tricky part by Omerna · · Score: 1

      I've heard that the Russians didn't have great success on their early manned launches, but we never heard a lot about them because of the total control of the press over there. Plus we don't have the satellites and what not we do now to really understand what they were doing in the middle of Siberia.

      --


      No sig for you.
    6. Re:The tricky part by lommer · · Score: 0

      "Launch is more dangerous in some ways if only because you've got X tons of very flammable (dare I say explosive?) materials under your butt. A slip-up there will tend to be much harder to fix or escape from."

      This is a common conception. I realize that explosives and explosions are very tangible and their destructive power can easily be seen, however, do people fail to realize that (almost) all all the energy held in those explosives is in the form of gravitational potential energy of the spacecraft? Just because it's in a different form doesn't mean it isn't still a shitload of energy...

    7. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to feed your obvious troll.

      But from the genocides in Iraq and Afganistan, I'd say the United States has the lowest regard for life in this world.

      Not to mention the number of people getting executed in jails throughout the United States, due to poverty and racial bias.

      Astronauts not dying is just for PR.

      I'm a bit fed up by the amount of right-winged racist crap on /. lately, just look at the ammount of racist comments posted on this article alone, we are nerds, we need to talk about the technical merits and not be concerned about anything else.

    8. Re:The tricky part by cheesybagel · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it had happened it would already have leaked by now. After all, we now know the secret history of the Soviet moon race. The secret history of the German scientists involvement in their rocket program. So why not about this bit as well.

    9. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nod, just ask NASA.

    10. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent point. Look how well that strategy worked for the US when Apollo 13 was lost! To this day, most Americans still think those poor bastards came home safely. It must have been a terrible, terrible way to die...

    11. Re:The tricky part by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
      to realize that (almost) all all the energy held in those explosives is in the form of gravitational potential energy of the spacecraft

      You, sir, are remarkably ignorant.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    12. Re:The tricky part by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm far more cognicent of potential energy than you can possibly know. What you're not thinking about is that when something goes wrong with explosives, there isn't time to compensadte. If your re-enty goes pear-shaped, you don't get smacked with ALL of the potential energy at once and you have some home of ajusting your plan.

      Also, gravitational potential energy has to first turn into kinetic energy before it can kill you. It's easy dump kinetic energy as heat (parachute, drag on the craft, those little pinwheels held outside the spacecraft, etc.) and KE isn't, by itself, dangerous. (It's that stop at the end that you need to be thinking about.) With an explosion, a lot of the energy is inherently heating you and your craft. It's hard to harmlessly dissipate the energy of a fireball inside the craft or the energy of suddenly-expanding gases inside the craft. The inherent nature of both is to kill you, while KE is pretty indifferent to your survival.

    13. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am hoping that their system is not based on Microsoft, for sure it will crash or ask the Takeout to reboot for landing, or blue screen.

    14. Re:The tricky part by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Addendum:

      I forgot to point out that there is a lot more energy in the fuel at launch than in the craft upon re-entry. Remember, the fuel has to not only loft the capsule but also the other fuel that well be burned up later in the flight and all of the later stages of the rocket.

    15. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off

    16. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "having their first man in space die on his way back would be disastrous"

      How would anyone know? They could just pretend that someone else was Yang Liwei, they all look the same.

    17. Re:The tricky part by lommer · · Score: 1

      Good points. But I would like to counter with a few of my own:

      -Even though you may not get smacked with all the energy at once during reentry, once you've begun you (as of yet) can't stop. While you may be able to adjust your plan a little, you won't really have that much time to adjust your plan effectively at all unless you've planned for those changes beforehand. Columbia's reentry was a pretty good example of this.

      -While it may be easy enough to dump KE as heat on a small scale, it isn't on the scale we're discussing. You either have to dump the kinetic energy very slowly (EXTREMELY difficult) or you have to design some mechanism of absorbing/dissipating all that heat in one go. The Columbia again serves as a good example. (Other spacecraft use ablative shielding for this, but this makes them non-reusable)

      -It is not that difficult to escape an explosion actually. The challenger disaster is an example of an explosion. However, one could attribute its catastrophic failure to the design of the launch configuration. If the space plane was placed differently (e.g. on top of the fuel tank) it would be possible to have instant-abort mechanisms where the shuttle leaves the exploding tank behind and aborts to either a crash-landing, bailout, or splashdown. In short, by isolating the fuel and engines from the humans/cargo, it is possible to have explosions that don't kill anyone.

      -"The inherent nature of both is to kill you, while KE is pretty indifferent to your survival."
      That's a good line, I'll have to remember it

      Overall, I'm not arguing that launch is any more dangerous than reentry, just that it is almost equally so.

    18. Re:The tricky part by mad+mad+ninja · · Score: 1

      Does that mean mid-air breakdown of engines count as Landing? It does hit the ground after all..

    19. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you get all of your information from bin Laden tapes?

      Also, do you prefer left-winged racist crap? Most racism comes from that side, they just do a better job of hiding it.

    20. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would make them look incompetent, compared to the USSR's and the US' first manned launches.

      LOOK incompetent? If the guy dies coming down they will have BEEN incompetent. They will LOOK like morons.

    21. Re:The tricky part by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I've heard that the Russians didn't have great success on their early manned launches,

      They used a safe procedure to incrementally test the new technology. Remember that they were really the first doing it, so there were questions not only about the quality of the equipment, but also the unknown dangers of the extra-atmospheric environment (Does the Van Allen belt emit lethal cosmic radiation? Who could guess?)

      The USSR (that's what they called it back then) flew it's space capsules through earth orbit carrying dogs and manniquins first, before ever putting a human in them. So any early failures would've killed "Ivan Ivanovich", not brave young pioneers. (The dummy came out fine, and is now on display in Washington, DC)

      I suppose a paranoid-type could theorize that there was really a human who died in that first test, and the corpse was replaced with a manniquin for better PR...

    22. Re:The tricky part by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      If it had happened it would already have leaked by now.

      Of course, that vague rumor he "heard" could be considered a kind of leak.

      It goes back to the pink elephant principle. Any claim involving "It's impossible for that to have happened, or someone would've heard about it" can be countered by a conspiracy theorist arguing that "We have heard of it, but because it's so outlandish nobody believes the reports"

    23. Re:The tricky part by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      I have read that the dog they sent up survived for a significantly shorter amount of time than the Soviets claimed.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    24. Re:The tricky part by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      There were a few cases where cosmonauts died, I recall in one instance a parachute came out tangled and the capsule crashed. That was around the Apollo time, or earlier. A soyuz craft depressurized before re-entry, killing the 3 crewmembers as well.

    25. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call what the left does as "racism" except for when they bash the religious right. I'd still mark them off as less racist in that they want us all to live together, next to gays and nihilists and everything.

    26. Re:The tricky part by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

      what kind of a stupid response is that? you'd actually think they'd LAUNCH w/out calculating for a return?

      that almost sounded like a snide political innuendo. I'm not defending China, but to think they're as stupid as you imply, is preposterours.

      --
      'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
    27. Re:The tricky part by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I agree. Going into space is dangerous ... coming back is dangerous. Noone claims that this is 100% safe. 99% would be pretty good in fact, so if there is an accident it doesn't necessarily mean that they're incompetent. They could just be very, very unlucky.

    28. Re:The tricky part by rodgerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, most Americans are still in denial about their Nazi driven space program. Does this mean the Russians are doing better in the honesty stakes?

    29. Re:The tricky part by caluml · · Score: 1

      I followed the link on the BBC article about this, supposedly to the Chinese Space Agency. But either someone has hijacked it, or something weird is happening. The BBC isn't like Slashdot - it would check the links before posting them, so I assume the site had the content they were expecting when they posted it.

    30. Re:The tricky part by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      Success in Russian or Chinese space programs seems to bring out the worst in US xenophobia and misplaced arrogance for some reasn I don't quite understand. So many of them start foaming at the mouth.

    31. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Shenzhou has a Mercury/Apollo/Soyez escape tower if anything does get nasty during launch.

      Unlike a certain other manned launch vehicle I can think of...

    32. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA is, I think, the only country in the world that executes juveniles. Even China doesn't do that...

    33. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A slip-up there will tend to be much harder to fix or escape from.

      As opposed to the leathal heat from friction on re-entry, or plummetting several miles in an aerodynamic death trap when something goes wrong on descent?

    34. Re:The tricky part by chiph · · Score: 1

      Landing tends to be most coasting/parachuting, which is relatively easy to do right.

      Landing is indeed the relatively-easy part (assuming the parachute opens/retro-rockets fire, etc). The hard part is reentry. Go in at too steep an angle and you burn up. Go in at too shallow of an angle, and you skip off the top of the atmosphere.

      Chip H.

    35. Re:The tricky part by ab762 · · Score: 1

      For a while I've been hosting some of James Oberg's Space History items. One is titled Dead Cosmonauts -- he documents five definite deaths:

      • Valentin Bondarenko, [died in training] March 23, 1961 -- a high-pressure oxygen fire similar to the Apollo 1 accident.
      • In April 1967 cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov was killed when the parachute of his Soyuz 1 spacecraft failed during the return to Earth
      • On June 30, 1971, the three cosmonauts of the Soyuz 1 1 crew perished on return to Earth.

      The last two were publicly (if not fully) acknowledged at the time.

      There were various rumours, but they have not stood up to investigatation, even after the fall of the Soviet Union.

    36. Re:The tricky part by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Sure you can stop reentry once you start. You'd just have to carry enough fuel to boost yourself back out of the atmosphere. It's much more difficult to stop an explosion once it starts, though.

      As for dumping KE, timescale IS relevent. Since you don't *gain* all of that potential energy all at once, you can slowly bleed off the KE that it becomes as you re-enter. Note that in many ways, Colombia was the worst-case senario: it was still moving very quickly in a relatively dense part of the atmosphere with a craft that is *not* self-stabalizing. (Unlike many capsules.)

      It isn't impossible to escape an explosion, but it's definately hard. You have at best a few seconds of warning to get clear. Having a craft that can jettison its tanks only helps if there is enough *time* to let them loose and move away. The nature of explosions is to happen really fast, by definition.

    37. Re:The tricky part by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Glad you saw Apollo 13, too. Alas, it doesn't actually apply. The skipping off the atmosphere is more true of a spacecraft returning from the Moon. It's a lot easier to manage to de-orbit, since all you have to do is hit the brakes a bit to ease into the atmosphere. You have lots of time and it's pretty easy to get it right. If you don't, you generally have time to do it again, since you're not going anywhere except perhaps down. (As opposed to missing the Earth and flying off on a multi-day orbit, which Apollo would have done.)

    38. Re:The tricky part by shivianzealot · · Score: 1

      A Chinese mission resulting in a fatality coming home wouldn't be new.

      Both the United States and USSR have lost people on reentry. You may recall STS-107 disintegrating earlier this year. I'm not sure about post-Soviet Russia's score on the matter. So far, everyone has had the excellent fortune of never loosing a man IN space, despite several scathingly close calls, and as I understand, this is a point of pride in in both Russian and US space agencies.

      --

      Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

    39. Re:The tricky part by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


      Yes, you can say explosive. Because on solid rocket boosters that is exactly what the propellant is - an explosive. If you take a hunk of the propellant, mash it up into granules and ignite it, it will violently explode. The reason why solid rocket boosters don't blow up on the launch pad is because the designers control how the burn occurs. Note that I said "mas it up into granules" a little earlier. This opens up a much greater amount of surface area to be ignited than if you left the propellant as a chunk. When you have much larger surface area exposed, it can all burn a lot faster resulting in the typical explosion. The way designers control this is by controlling the amount of surface area exposed to the burn. A much smaller surface area is exposed, so the burn occurs much less rapidly and in a somewhat more controlled fashion (although you can not control the rate of burn or stop the burn once you start it).

    40. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're short on cases of fatality. There have been five, not three: One on the launchpad (Apollo 1), one on launch (Challenger, and a few close-calls), and at least three on landing (Two Soyuz capsules failed on reentry, one from a Soyuz mission (Soyuz 4 if I remember right) and one from the Salut missions (Salut 1, again, if I remember right), and lastly the Columbia this year). There was one case of serious failure during a mission, but the most likely time for Apollo 13 to have turned fatal would have been on reentry, if something had happened to damage the heat shield. The vast majority of unmanned failures have been on launch, but not many on reentry because most unmanned spacecraft aren't intended to come back.

    41. Re:The tricky part by pmz · · Score: 1

      we never heard a lot about them because of the total control of the press over there.

      Exactly. There was a show on the History Channel or Discovery Wings (I forget which) entirely about how the USSR's propoganda and military machines kept early disasters from the West. There was one incident, I believe, where an explosian killed dozens of people on the ground, but it was kept very very quiet. There was another incident where a failed reentry parachute made short work of a cosmonaut when the capsule hit the ground. They also had a cabin fire exactly like Apollo 1, but didn't tell anyone about it leaving the USA wide open to make the exact same mistake. Censorship does kill people.

    42. Re:The tricky part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the Chinese, a large part of the value in this space launch is its propaganda value.


      And this does not apply to USA?

  5. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations!!

    1. Re:Congratulations by cranos · · Score: 1

      Oh aren't we the ever positive one. Damn those Chinese for not leaping straight into warp travel. How dare they not land a man on mars and immediately start building massive colonies.

      Sheesh, every journey begins with a single step, and this is it.

      As for the oppression, famine and poverty, the money spent on a space programme is a fraction of that spent on military hardware. If you want to fund good works, sell a couple of b-2s.

    2. Re:Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well how else are they going to test to see if their ICBM design works without international outrage? Just stuff a man and a life support system in a ICBM and your military test is now a scientific research mission.

    3. Re:Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And welfare programs are already cost several times more than defense. Want to improve the human condition? Invent better methodologies and be more productive.

    4. Re:Congratulations by keesh · · Score: 1

      Your trolling really has gone downhill.

  6. Congradulations!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congradulations on a job well done !!

  7. I saw a movie about this by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    In the end a Patriot missile took out the Chinese ICBMs.

    I think Morgan Freeman and Jack Palance were in it.

  8. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See, things made in China are built to last!

    *Me prays that the rocket will hold together*

  9. In the Words of Shaq... by dupper · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...I would like to offer the following congratulations: ching-chong-yang-wah-ah-soh

    1. Re:In the Words of Shaq... by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      Oh come on... this is slashdot. Do you think anyone here actually knows who Shaq is? And the joke you're referencing?

      Now if it were a Monty Python joke, you'd be golden. But anything sports related, and you're boned.

      How about them Marlins, eh?

    2. Re:In the Words of Shaq... by SexyAlexie · · Score: 1

      Dew leh moh loh!

      --
      I'm too sexy for you.
  10. I have just one thing to say. by Carnildo · · Score: 1

    It's about damned time!

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  11. alt news source by jaredmauch · · Score: 2, Informative
    CCTV.com can also provide you with chinese local news. I'm watching CCTV9 (english) on DirecTV currently. It's on their 110 satellite, so you need the "oval dish" and compatible receiver. Channel 455. Not surprising, Nasa TV has no coverage.

    Hopefully this will cause NASA and the US gov't to focus more on the need for ongoing space exploration.

    1. Re:alt news source by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      Is it being broadcast live? From what I heard China stopped live coverage of their space program after a few unfortunate incidents involving ground casaulties (though I don't think the linked article is the one which created the blockage of live reporting/broadasts).

    2. Re:alt news source by videodriverguy · · Score: 1

      Yes - it was. I am watching CCTV 9 here in China, and the coverage is intense (as I expected it to be). So far everything seems to be going well. The landing should be around 6AM tomorrow - not sure whether I will be awake though.

    3. Re:alt news source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no real need for ongoing space exploration, only artificially generated political need.

      There's only one real reason to go into space: to establish colonies to spread humanity across different planets, to ensure that a global disaster doesn't extinguish our species.

      We can't do that yet, so the whole "let's put spam in a can and fling it through the air really far" thing is utterly pointless and dull.

    4. Re:alt news source by ViolentGreen · · Score: 0

      I read somewhere that the launch was televised but not live. I can't find where I read that though.

      It's not too hard to imagine that it is live now, since he is already up there. It'll be interesting to see if it is live for the reentry as well. It might indicate how much faith China has in this mission.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  12. Nice, but... by suso · · Score: 0, Troll

    this should have happened long ago. It's one thing to put a man into space when you're the first one to do it or when you are part of the initial space race. But 40+ years is long enough that all the information and resources are probably available to country that has enough money to throw at it.

    1. Re:Nice, but... by lommer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Few people realize this, but NASA's 45th Anniversary was just 14 days ago (Oct. 1st). While you are right that the US and the Russians achieved the same feat decades ago, look where they are right now. NASA is stagnating, having made no progress since the shuttle was deployed and merely continuing a program of attrition where their few resources are slowly being destroyed in one accident after another. The Russian program, while still somewhat effective, is severely strapped for cash and is still relying on the technology they developed in the 60s.

      I for one applaud China for taking the initiative in the field of aerospace at a time when the rest of the world is facing inward, worrying about their stagnating economy or a petty squabble in the middle east*. Hopefully they will progress further succesfully and rapidly - we haven't had nearly enough development in aviation since the X-15 project was scrapped.

      * I mean no disrespect to the Isreali nor Palestinian dead by this. Current events in that region are tragic, I merely wish that as humans we could rise above it and focus ourselves on more lofty goals as the Chinese have...

    2. Re:Nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Confucius say, he who would walk far must take first step.

    3. Re:Nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this fucker up!

    4. Re:Nice, but... by whiteygonnapay · · Score: 1

      Why was it such a big deal for the US to catch up to the Soviets and launch a man into space a year after they first did so then? Surely that was irrelavant as the Soviets had already accomplished the task.

    5. Re:Nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and focus ourselves on more lofty goals as the Chinese have...

      You clearly don't know much about the Chinese. Unless you ARE Chinese, chances are better than good that wherever you live is officially considered an enemy nation. Do some searches for the Chinese military annual defense posture reports. Around about 96 they started referring to the US and a bunch of other western nations specifically as "enemies" of China.

  13. why no broadcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A last minute decision to not broadcast the launch on live television prevented millions from seeing the 19-story-tall rocket climb toward space.

    now why did they do that? were they afraid it might fail?

    1. Re:why no broadcast? by andih8u · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually, yes, I believe that was the reason given. They probably didn't want some challenger-esque footage following their future attempts.

      --


      slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
  14. Dispatch from Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yea, um, I'd like an order of chicken and broccoli, and some steamed dumplings....yea, and some of those crispy noodles w/the sweet sauce. How long? Twenty mintues? Sounds good...send it on out."

    1. Re:Dispatch from Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wan pok fied lice? Today no pok fied lice. Only cheeken. Cheeken wi bak bean sos? OK, sik dollah. We be der in thirty minus.

      The guy at the shop seriously sounded like that. What's weird is that the rest of the staff didn't have any serious accent problems. Just that guy taking the orders.

    2. Re:Dispatch from Mars by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      That's because they're making fun of you.

    3. Re:Dispatch from Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By reinforcing a stereotype at their own expense?

      That's just dumb.

  15. Questions by c0dedude · · Score: 1

    Has anyone gotten a chance to hear about the equipment they're using? It's mostly russian Soyez hardware isn't it? More information in this department would be interesting, I know NASA based rocket design off of ICBM's in the early program, did china go the same way?

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    1. Re:Questions by allrong · · Score: 1

      From what I've read it is based somewhat on the Soyuz design, but a substantial portion is "homegrown" in China.

      --
      What is the inverse of the Matrix?
    2. Re:Questions by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.astronautix.com/articles/shefacts.htm

      "The Shenzhou spacecraft appears similar to the Russian Soyuz, but is different in dimensions (slightly larger and heavier) and does not seem to use any detailed parts copied from the Soyuz or built under license. Therefore although it follows the classic layout of the Soyuz, adopts many of the same technical solutions, and the re-entry vehicle has the same shape, it cannot be considered strictly a 'copy'. And if one considers Shenzhou to be a copy of the Soyuz, then was the Soyuz design stolen - from the American General Electric Apollo spacecraft proposal?"

      http://www.astronautix.com/articles/wastolen.htm

      More linked stuff :)

      "Whoever flies aboard Shenzhou-5, they will not be the first person born in China to fly in space. William Anders, born in Hong Kong, orbited the moon in December 1968. Shannon Lucid, born in Shanghai, holds the world record for a woman for time in space (over 223 days in space on 5 spaceflights). And physicist Taylor Wang, also born in Shanghai, spent seven days in space aboard shuttle mission STS-51-B in 1985."

      http://www.astronautix.com/articles/couzhou5.htm

      I'm all for the Chinese entering space, but like the Soviets before and after the Second World War and the reconstruction of Germany in the 30s these technological and engineering feats have been accomplished through social and political changes which lead to the deaths of millions and the destruction of cultural identities for millions more.

      Good luck to the crew and the staff who accomplished this, and I hope that we will see less and less oppression in China of thier minorities.

    3. Re:Questions by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      No, they've made their own equipment, they had technical help from the Russians, and they've ended up with a vaguely similar design, but as far as I know it's purely Chinese manufactured.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    4. Re:Questions by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      well as far as i know the missle is variant american of design.. assuming of course it was based on the military missle program which was started by an american scientist and the capsule is suposed to be an upgraded syouz.
      I think that is besided the point though. This is a rather remarkable achievement. I hope it gives nasa a kick in the pants that i need to start bing innovative again

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    5. Re:Questions by Erbo · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Shenzhou's design is based on that of the Soyuz, with the same three-module construction, but it's slightly larger. They don't share any parts in common. (The Soyuz, in turn, bears a strong resemblance to General Electric's proposed Apollo spacecraft.) Meanwhile, the Long March CZ-2F booster is said to be descended from the DF-4, the first Chinese ICBM.

      See this link. This link is also relevant; it has various facts and figures on the Shenzhou.

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    6. Re:Questions by silex_reloaded · · Score: 0

      [quote] I hope that we will see less and less oppression in China of thier minorities. [/quote]

      I've read lots of comments on slashdot these days. Many people seem to be holding a biased view. Don't just believe whatever your US medias and Bush (and his Daddy) said. Go there yourself, and see what it is like. I lived in China 22 years and just left there one year ago, so i believe I know better than most people here.

      Many people might think China is just reinventing the wheel and repeating what has be done 40 years ago. But the real problem is, would US ever give China "the wheel", if they don't do it themselves?
      When Linus release the very first version of Linux, I believe there were people thinking he was reinventing the wheel, too.

    7. Re:Questions by merchant_x · · Score: 1

      A quick google brought this up. Facts on China's Shenzhou spacecraft

    8. Re:Questions by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      I'm all for the Chinese entering space, but like the Soviets before and after the Second World War and the reconstruction of Germany in the 30s these technological and engineering feats have been accomplished through social and political changes which lead to the deaths of millions and the destruction of cultural identities for millions more.


      The US imported a bunch of Nazis and let them off any appearances at Nuremburg to bootstrap their space program. Don't assume NASAs hands are any cleaner than their Soviet or Chinese counterparts.
    9. Re:Questions by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      So did the Soviets.

      I assume that the Eisenhower and Truman administrations weren't involved in collectvization movements that amplified the effects of a drought and forced people to farming that knew nothing of farming which lead to the deaths of 18 to 40 million people so that we'd have a Great Leap Foreward.

    10. Re:Questions by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      "I lived in China 22 years and just left there one year ago, so i believe I know better than most people here."

      I've not lived in China, but my "biased view" isn't from what the Bush Administrations say or what the media shows me.

      It comes from actions.

      1. Great Leap Forward - 20 to 30 million dead from forced collectivization of farms and hardships caused by the Communist Government

      2. Invasion and occupation of Tibet

      3. Oppression of Muslim and other minority groups.

      4. Tiananmen Square, 1989

      5. Demand that Taiwan be "reunited" with Communist China even if it is by force of arms.

      "But the real problem is, would US ever give China "the wheel", if they don't do it themselves?"

      Oh yea, we were more than happy to "give them pieces of the whole wheel and brake assembly" in the late 90s to help thier commerical launch vehicles get those Iridium sats up into orbit without launch vehicle failures.

  16. Well Done by Erick+the+Red · · Score: 1

    I just want to say congratulations to the China space programme. As a mechanical engineering student, I can appreciate the work it takes to successfuly complete so complicated a feat. I hope this jump-starts not only the US space programme, but space programmes around the world.

    --

    DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE

    ok
    1. Re:Well Done by mrd_yaddayadda · · Score: 1

      Aye, a hearty well done! I just am keeping my fingers crossed that they get the guy back ok...

  17. And on the menu? by mrpuffypants · · Score: 0, Troll

    21 hours worth of Tang, Ramen, and Frozen Dog

    1. Re:And on the menu? by tkw954 · · Score: 1

      Oh crap! With all the frozen dog jokes that are sure to show up, slashdot is certain to be blocked by the Great Firewall of China. Good-bye slashdot, hello The People's China News.

  18. Yeah, right. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does anyone know how to say, "Capricorn One", in Chinese?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Yeah, right. by Chagatai · · Score: 2, Funny
      According to BabelFish, the phrase would be "ZR--re". However, when I translate it back the phrase becomes "The goat sits one". Guess we know where the Chinese now stand.

      Then again, translating the phrase "One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" into Chinese and back yields, "One half step manner, one giant leap is the humanity." Just remember that.

      --
      --Chag
    2. Re:Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to BabelFish, the phrase would be "ZR--re". However, when I translate it back the phrase becomes "The goat sits one". Guess we know where the Chinese now stand.

      Like this?

  19. What do you mean, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "China has become only the third nation on Earth capable of independently launching its citizens into orbit. "

    China has been launching it's citizens into orbit for ages :(

  20. information blackout by ee_moss · · Score: 1

    It's interesting how China kept secret the time and day of the launch. Kind of sad how communism works like that. For such a mark in history, I'm sure the world would have liked to see the launch live on TV, and known about it in advance so they could plan their evenings accordingly.

    As everyone else is saying, congrats to China. Too bad they have to be so undercover about it.

    1. Re:information blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As everyone else is saying, congrats to China.

      Yeah, I would love to hear you say this again after the Chinese detonate a nuclear warhead over your city.

      There's good news and there's bad news. This story falls definitively into the latter category.

    2. Re:information blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were probably afraid that it would explode or otherwise fail-- after all, they have to be perfect in the eyes of their people, don't they? It would be a terrible embarrassment if the rocket blew up on the launchpad in front of all of China.

    3. Re:information blackout by Erick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      We can only hope that they filmed it, but didn't show it live in case something went wrong. Maybe it'll get released in a couple of days.

      --

      DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE

      ok
    4. Re:information blackout by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      For such a mark in history, I'm sure the world would have liked to see the launch live on TV, and known about it in advance so they could plan their evenings accordingly.

      I read that the Chinese government used to broadcast satellite launches until a rocket exploded on the lauchpad, killing the ground crew.

      The powers that be were probably worried about the potential for a similar accident. Keep in mind this is the same governmnet that denied the existence of SARS this year, and only last year acknowledged that some people in China had been diagnosed with HIV.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    5. Re:information blackout by ee_moss · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I would love to hear you say this again after the Chinese detonate a nuclear warhead over your city.

      haha.. you know? you're probably right.

      I think making advancements in technology and exploring space in its purest form is a good thing, which is what I think this story is about. At least on the outside.

      But communism is definately not such a good thing. As my old friend Ronald once said, "How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." - Reagan.

      It seems, though, that China is getting more of a capitalist exterior to integrate with other countries such as the U.S., making it a little more economically dependent on other countries (such as the US) to get things it needs. That (should) decrease our chances of getting nuked any time soon, but you can never tell with those commies.

    6. Re:information blackout by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      im sorry, what else do you expect from a leftwing gov? compassion? understanding? equality? tell that to mao, he would have proabably told you about how he will bring all that into the world.
      Dont be surprised. besides, most human rights organizations dont complain about it so it must not be true after all the real enemy is the US...

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    7. Re:information blackout by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      They didn't want to be embarrassed if the rocket blew up on launch.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    8. Re:information blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only country to ever detonate a nuclear bomb over a city was the United States. China is never going to forget that, obviously. You're going to blame them for developing weapons of mass destruction? We'd be over there "helping" just like did in Vietnam (or currently in Iraq) if we weren't scared of a dozen red flag ICBMs flying over the horizion.

      If China wanted to bring about the end of the world as we know it they could have done it decades ago, this isn't something new.

    9. Re:information blackout by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      Maybe it'll get released in a couple of days.

      Love how the /. folks want to holler about communist filtering of the propoganda, especially in a case like this. If you haven't seen replays of the launch, maybe, just maybe, you should switch to non american news sources. I've seen two replays already tonite on the tv.

      Tune in the CBC if you want to see it, altho, they have run it a few times already, not sure it'll run to many more times.

      This does make me wonder tho, are the american networks really not running the tapes of the launch ? If not, why not ?

      Gonna try submit this one more time, and then give up. Seems /. is suffering the /. effect yet again...

    10. Re:information blackout by A+Bugg · · Score: 1

      Of course the American networks are running tapes of the launch, I saw the replay of the launch on BOTH Fox News and CNN and MSNBC (i think it was msnbc i was just flipping through). CNN even has video of it on their website (it's premium content though).

      A Bugg

    11. Re:information blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the US tried to "help" in the 50s and as usual had no luck. I guess people just don't like being conquered by arrogant assholes go figure.

    12. Re:information blackout by rodgerd · · Score: 1
      It seems, though, that China is getting more of a capitalist exterior


      That would be the transformation of China from a Communist state to a Facist one. It's still a nasty and brutal dictatorship, they'vre just noticed that Sam Walton's as keen on those as much as Henry Ford thought Hitler had a swell setup.

      making it a little more economically dependent on other countries (such as the US) to get things it needs


      Other way around. The US is now incredibly dependent on the Chinese, what with so many companies depending on China for their manufacturing base.

      And dependence doesn't guarantee squat. The US is dependent on oil. It doesn't seem to have done Iraq or Venezuala much good. For that matter, it hasn't done a lot for many citizens of nations like Saudi Arabia, either.
    13. Re:information blackout by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      im sorry, what else do you expect from a leftwing gov?

      Actually, I am sorry that you appear to be rather uninformed. China has a totalitarian regime which calls itself communist. It is not the communism of Lenin or Trotsky. As with all totalitarian regimes, life is good if you are well-connected and at the top. Life sucks if you are one of the masses.

      most human rights organizations dont complain about it

      I take it you are unfamiliar with Amnesty International, to name but one?

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    14. Re:information blackout by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      Right AI has big public campaigns against china.. how often do you see that . now compare that to anti-US protests.
      Your dismissal of cina is typical of a communist apologist. Ive lived in acountry where people have been killed by communists so you can take you stupid ignorant academic crap and shove it.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    15. Re:information blackout by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      Your dismissal of cina is typical of a communist apologist. Ive lived in acountry where people have been killed by communists so you can take you stupid ignorant academic crap and shove it.

      Whatever...

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  21. I want flyover info by dpille · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and I'm sure everybody else wants it too. NORAD has nothing, NASA has nothing, space.com has nothing, and I can't read Chinese.

    Like it needs to be said, but if anybody stumbles across that information, totally post it.

    1. Re:I want flyover info by Basehart · · Score: 1

      You won't find anything about Chinese space exploration on space.com! Try http://www.space.cn

  22. GO CHINA! by lommer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given the comments I've heard recently here on slashdot, I think I speak for many of us when I say GO CHINA!

    Sincerest congratulations to the Chinese. I hope everyone here realizes what a momentous occaision in history has just occured - This may well be remembered as the beginning of the second space race.

    1. Re:GO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second space-race?

      They already have first and second placers and the rest have yet to start. They're not racing against anybody.

    2. Re:GO CHINA! by why-is-it · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This may well be remembered as the beginning of the second space race.

      If so, it will be interesting to see whether history judges it to have been worth it. I would think that there are immediate problems down here on earth that need to be solved and spending lots of money on a really interesting dream may not be the best way to allocate scarce resources...

      On a separate note, I wonder if the people who argue that NASA faked the moon landings will question this as well?

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    3. Re:GO CHINA! by Invidious · · Score: 0
      If so, it will be interesting to see whether history judges it to have been worth it. I would think that there are immediate problems down here on earth that need to be solved and spending lots of money on a really interesting dream may not be the best way to allocate scarce resources...



      Feh, almost every significant advancement by humanity has occurred when people spent a lot of scant resources on a really interesting dream.

    4. Re:GO CHINA! by incom · · Score: 1

      Speaking of the moon landings, I hope that china doens't stop after the PR dies down, and actually does some cool stuff like permanent moon bases and manned mars missions. With the amount thats been spent on redundant spy satellites and expired/ing bombs by the military here in america we could have done some much more interesting and beneficial(to humanity) things.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    5. Re:GO CHINA! by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      And hopefully a second cold war. Think of the possibilities!

      --
      hey!
    6. Re:GO CHINA! by Malor · · Score: 1

      This is such stupid thinking. There is wealth beyond our imaginations sitting right above our heads, if only we'd have the gumption to go get it.

      By your way of thinking, Old Europe should have "waited to solve all its problems" instead of sending Columbus westward. Spending all that money on exploration was an obvious waste when there were hungry people to feed.

      Expansion will give us the wealth we need to fix our old problems. It will also gives us new ones, but that's just the nature of life. The better we do at the solving problems game, the bigger problems we get. When we fail to solve problems, we die. That's how it works.

      I, for one, am quite glad that our ancestors chose to ignore hungry people and explored westward; the new resources we brought online allowed us to feed a larger percentage of the population than ever before, and raise the average standard of living to such a degree that medieval kings would have been jealous of average first-world citizens.

      If we try to curl into our little shells and ignore the resources overhead, we will, as a species, die out.

    7. Re:GO CHINA! by survomies · · Score: 1

      With a pacifist such as G.W.Bush as the president of the USA the second cold war would turn out to be a rather hot one, i suppose?

    8. Re:GO CHINA! by TurtlesAllTheWayDown · · Score: 1
      ...but Old Europe did wait to solve all its problems, before frittering money off on wild goose chases after gold and spices that never quite panned out anyway-


      at least the most pressing crisis of the day, that of their nasty, godless relations to the south.

      Yes, Isabella reluctantly bid Columbus set sail the day after the last of the Jews had [officially anyway] been expelled from Cordoba.


      Just imagine; if Spain had decided that sending out ships to raid the spice islands was of higher priority than exterminating the Moors from Spain, how much different Europe and the world might be today, with a vital tradition of both Jewish and Moslem culture in the mediterranean.

      Perhaps some argument can be made, that sending all our effort into exploration and discovery is a better strategy than beating up on our neighbors and solving other domestic disputes, but history seems to favor the latter.

    9. Re:GO CHINA! by Pyromage · · Score: 1

      Much of the money that is ineffiently spent on space exploration could, in theory, be put to good use feeding the hungry (or, vastly more importantly, making them able to feed themselves).

      Do you honestly think it will happen? I think, in America at least, that the money would just be dumped somewhere less promising, and that no money would actually truly help people.

      A perfect government would use the money to solve its country's problems, and not on exploration. However, that 1: presumes that exploration will not yield a solution and 2: presumes that the government _can_ solve the problems.

      Sitting on our asses down here won't solve the problems either. I truly think that the government cannot significantly impact our problems by hamstringing NASA.

      I think that chasing the dream of space is at least as likely to solve our problems as the likely misuses of those funds.

      Nothing good was ever won by staring. The sky is there, and it may not be going anywhere. There's a wealth of resources out there, and while it may not solve our problems, it also just might, and at least won't make them worse.

      We'll know when we get there.

    10. Re:GO CHINA! by Pionar · · Score: 1, Funny

      I for one welcome our Taikonaut overlords.

    11. Re:GO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You like your computer? Microwave? Food that doesn't spoil in 48 hours? The entire list would take several paragraphs.

      I'd say that was worth it.

    12. Re:GO CHINA! by InfoVore · · Score: 1
      Given the comments I've heard recently here on slashdot, I think I speak for many of us when I say GO CHINA!

      You forgot to add: Godspeed, Yang Liwei

      --
      "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
    13. Re:GO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

    14. Re:GO CHINA! by Chess+Cardigan · · Score: 0

      And I for one welcome our new Chinese overlords.

    15. Re:GO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ronald Reagan put an end to the cold war. He was a Republican. Don't let your twisted little liberal mind forget that.

    16. Re:GO CHINA! by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      Reagan simply accelerated what the Democrats had put into place 40 years earlier.

      = 9J =

    17. Re:GO CHINA! by 11223 · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't care about the problems that most of humanity faces, so I'm not all that unhappy about the resumption of experimental manned spaceflight, even if it is by China. Only a certain group of people actually possess the ambition and desire to get off this rock, and the rest of you can happily stay behind - after we leave.

    18. Re:GO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the US decided to scrap Apollo technology and step back to LEO and save money back in the 1970s.

      And what the savings have been spent on is a massive military build up.

    19. Re:GO CHINA! by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Yay! GO CHINA!

      Yeah, go ahead, mod me down, I've got karma to burn.

    20. Re:GO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In discussions of spaceflight policy the example of Zheng He's Chinese naval explorations before the Europeans is often mentioned. The Chinese developed an immensely sophisticated naval exploration capability well before Europe, then threw the whole lot away. It was the Europeans, starting from a lesser technological base, that ran with the idea and conquered the earth.

      And now in spaceflight five centuries later it's the US looking like old China and the new China looking like the Europeans!!!

      The USA may have been the first to get to the moon, but my money's on the Chinese to be the first to colonise the solar system. They have firm government and public support for space, a long-term vision, the fastest-growing economy on earth, are basing their program on simple and proven space technologies and have a program that's been going for over ten years and has built up enormous momentum.

      What does the US have in comparison? Saturn V, sorry can't build them any more. Shuttle? Hideously expensive and ludicrously complicated deathtrap. ISS? In limbo because of the shuttle. And no indication that the current administration will spend the funds on a come-from-behind Apollo-style knock-down response to China.

      My hope is that we do see a new peaceful space race, with both powers looking towards a hopefully permanent base on the moon.

      My fear is that the US in its current militaristic mood will take this as the signal to crush China in an arms race and keep a monopoly on manned space by force if necessary. Read Stephen Baxter's novel "Titan" and shudder...

    21. Re:GO CHINA! by Elladan · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of the country's problems is lack of exploration.

      How does not spending money on exploration help this?

    22. Re:GO CHINA! by Moofie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, anybody who thinks that space research and development isn't ABSURDLY PROFITABLE need only look at the tax revenue generated by the communications satellite industry, and compare that to NASA's budget for, say, the last 50 years.

      So far, space exploration has been CHEAP. Thinking that you have better ways to spend the $1 your taxes contributed to NASA's budget this year is just ridiculous. There are A LOT of other places we could carve out serious money from the federal budget. NASA is small potatoes.

      Speaking of agriculture, how much did we pay people to not grow stuff this year? Just checking.

      An aside: I think NASA is doing a terrible job of exploring and exploiting space. Yet another unmanned probe is just not enough to get people engaged in space travel. The science is great, but the real reason to go to space is to explore new frontiers, and settle them. Anything that does not aim directly at that goal is wasting time.

      Humans are, by nature, explorers. I believe that much of the strife and ennui we feel today is because we don't have the hope of being able to go to a new place, and make it a home. I believe that the best and the brightest have always been willing to settle new lands, and I would LOVE to be one of the next generation.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    23. Re:GO CHINA! by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      Much of the money that is ineffiently spent on space exploration could, in theory, be put to good use feeding the hungry (or, vastly more importantly, making them able to feed themselves).

      what's the point in feeding hungry people here when a 5 km astroid comes ripping thru our atmosphere and kills every single one of us?

      on Earth, we have all our eggs sitting in one basket, and that's a really bad idea.

      we got to get off this rock and start setting up civilizations elsewhere. i mean, we are far from this, but we need to make the small steps necessary to eventually get there.

    24. Re:GO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first off, i agree with you.

      but...you know, if you stop referring to earth as "this rock" you'll sound a lot more reasonable and a lot less like a cliche-spouting dork.

    25. Re:GO CHINA! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Would you care to provide some support for your wild-ass assertion?

      Please explain how the Great Society plan brought about the downfall of the USSR.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    26. Re:GO CHINA! by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      First, 'this rock' is a misnomer.

      Second, who says we're going to let you just flit off on an adventure? You are NOT an 'individual.' You're part of a biome, and you can pretend you can just up and leave, but that's your fantasy.

      Change the channel once in awhile. You clearly watch too much Star Trek.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    27. Re:GO CHINA! by Saeger · · Score: 1
      This may well be remembered as the beginning of the second space race.

      Yet Another Rocket Launch is probably not the beginning of a 2nd chemical rocket space race. No, the next space race will begin once we can manufacture carbon nanotubes more than a few feet in length ... if you can guess where I'm going with this...

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    28. Re:GO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the mentality of some people is really lame..

      They think they can sit around and fuck up everything here, and it doesn't matter because we can go fly away to some magical planet that's just like earth (but without all the problems that have been created here).

    29. Re:GO CHINA! by ces · · Score: 1

      They already have first and second placers and the rest have yet to start. They're not racing against anybody.

      Not really since the space "race" hasn't ended yet.

      The US manned program is at a standstil post-Columbia. It is unclear at this point if NASA will send anyone up anytime soon on a US built spacecraft.

      The Russians while still posessing a current manned launch capacity aren't really advancing their technology or capablities very rapidly at the moment.

      According to the articles I've read on the Chinese program they are going to have a small space station very soon (part of each manned capsule stays in orbit and are designed to hook together). They are planning to return to the moon within the next 10 years and to do a manned Mars mission in the next 25.

      I'd say there is a good chance the US and Russia could end up getting "passed" in the space race by the Chinese.

      Of course there is also a fairly good chance based on the US and USSR space program that the Chinese plans beyond the next 10 years or so will not come to pass.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    30. Re:GO CHINA! by ces · · Score: 1

      If so, it will be interesting to see whether history judges it to have been worth it. I would think that there are immediate problems down here on earth that need to be solved and spending lots of money on a really interesting dream may not be the best way to allocate scarce resources...

      By that same rationale we shouldn't spend a bunch of money on faster computers, improved cell phones, undersea fiber optic cables, or improved recreational equipment because there are more pressing problems deserving the money.

      Feh!

      If the Chinese government wishes to spend money in this way who are we to tell them not to?

      Besides without a space race we aren't likely to develop the technology necessary to be able to do something about the next big rock or comet that decides it wants to use Earth for target practice.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    31. Re:GO CHINA! by turgid · · Score: 1

      They don't have god in China.

    32. Re:GO CHINA! by ces · · Score: 1

      Second, who says we're going to let you just flit off on an adventure? You are NOT an 'individual.' You're part of a biome, and you can pretend you can just up and leave, but that's your fantasy.

      Check out some of NASA's reasearch on the Earth's environment, space has done quite a lot to further our understanding of how the biosphere of our own planet works.

      Heck I'd wager the simple PR value for international peace and environmental causes provided by the photos of the Earth taken by the Apollo astronauts far outweighs any money that has been "wasted" on manned or unmanned space flight by all countries combined.

      It is by daring to dream that man reaches his greatest heights, not by staring down into the mud and refusing to think about anything other than the immediate future.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    33. Re:GO CHINA! by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      First of all, Government doesn't solve problems. People do, specifically free people. Liberty and freedom are what generated the great wealth that the US and other free nations enjoy. Once people start relying on the Government to solve social ills, the long slow spiral to despotism begins.

      Second, the space program costs us exactly zero dollars. There is SO much revenue generated by space technology both directly (comm sattelites, etc.) and indirectly ( enormously profitable advances in material science, engineering, computers, ad infinitum) that when taken as a whole the cost to the economy is nil. So many things that we take for granted, from instant beverages to those sweet foam mattresses to satellite TV and phone communication, were born out of the space program.

    34. Re:GO CHINA! by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      The people of Tibet may have a different opinion.

    35. Re:GO CHINA! by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      I am excited to see a space program bent on taking people back to the moon. Today we are all Chinese.

    36. Re:GO CHINA! by hackus · · Score: 1

      Ditto for that.

      I also congratulate the Chinese people for having the vision and the know how, to finish what the west cannot.

      I also wish the Chinese people luck with their newly found Dragon processor and Linux distribution.

      It is my sincere hopes that you kick the worlds but in computer technology, and provide every single chinese with a computer...

      running Linux of course!

      I think everyone in the Linux community hopes that the Chinese people send the Penguin to the moon! :-)

      -hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    37. Re:GO CHINA! by HardCase · · Score: 1
      Given the comments I've heard recently here on slashdot, I think I speak for many of us when I say GO CHINA!


      Well, you don't speak for me. I might say go Yang Liwei, but not GO CHINA. Remember, you're congratulating a totalitarian regime that considers the basic rights that we hold so dear to be very "alienable". It's a country whose leaders were so afraid that the launch might not go so well that they refused any international press coverage and darn near no internal "press" coverage. China's space program is eerily reminiscent of the Soviet Union's space program; it is shrouded in secrecy and funded by a crushingly inefficient economic system. Like the rest of Chinese society and government, there is no openness. Without openness, all their space program will become is a propaganda tool and development test bed for military projects. Compare this with the US space program that allowed both successes and failures to be freely observed, that not only allowed, but encouraged the transfer of space-related technology from the program to the private sector and allowed civilian scientists to engage in space travel. The Soviet Union did not do this and China will not do it.


      Now, I'm far from happy with the direction that NASA has taken the US space program, but the one thing that NASA has that a totalitarian regime will never allow is the freedom of the public to see virtually everything it does, the good and the bad.


      So, go Liwei! But not China.


      -h-

    38. Re:GO CHINA! by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      First of all, Government doesn't solve problems. People do, specifically free people. Liberty and freedom are what generated the great wealth that the US and other free nations enjoy. Once people start relying on the Government to solve social ills, the long slow spiral to despotism begins.

      Dude, take a reality break for just a moment.

      Did it *ever* occur to you that the world is a more "socialist" place now than it has ever been before? What public infrastructure existed 200 years ago? Museums, schools and libraries existed only for the privileged class, and now they are there for everyone. Go farther back and tell me what we had by way of public transit and publicly available health care?

      Face it, we are gradually moving in the direction of looking out for the entire society and not just those who have money and power. The pace of change is slow because people are generally stupid and greedy. We tend to be interested in immediate gratification regardless of the long-term impact of our choices. Slowly though, we mature and begin to make informed choices about what is really in our best interests.

      Spare us the rhetoric about freedom and liberty. Western governments are quite content to deal with tyrants and despots provided that behave as we tell them to.

      As for the cost of the space race being effectively zero in the long run, that may be true. However, we are dealing with the allocation of scarce resources in the short run, and thousands of people die every day on this planet because they lack adequate food, water and shelter. Pity that we choose instant beverages and foam mattresses over human lives...

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    39. Re:GO CHINA! by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      Let's keep things in perspective, shall we? China is still a repressive, authoritarian state, who actively suppresses dissent and free speech. I suppose getting into space is a positive achievement, but not enough for me to cheer "GO CHINA!"

      Peace be with you,
      -jimbo

    40. Re:GO CHINA! by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
      Speaking of agriculture, how much did we pay people to not grow stuff this year? Just checking.

      Well they paid me $7600 of the $10000 to put in drainage pipes on our newly leveled farm and to leave 20 of 200 acres fallow this year.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    41. Re:GO CHINA! by gorgon · · Score: 1
      40 years before the end of the Cold War dates back to Truman administration. The Truman Doctrine, that the United States must support democracy through out the world and contain the spread of communism, was the basis for US foreign policy during the Cold War. Democrats and Republicans came and went from the presidency and the results of applying the Truman doctrine varied, but it was always the policy of the US.

      Historians can debate how much Reagan's military build up and saber rattling sped up the decline of the Soviet Union, but there is little doubt that it would have fallen eventually.

      --

      And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
      Berke Breathed
    42. Re:GO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't even say Go Liwei. Read his statements. He is a loyal supporter of the so-called People's Liberation Army and of the Chinese government. He would not be a taikonaut were it otherwise. His only statements to the press have been praise of the Chinese government and nation. Compare his China-shilling quotes to those of previous space pioneers and prepare to be sickened. He's a mindless drone, not a brash pioneer like Yuri Gagarin or Alan Shepard. China sent an organic robot into space, not a man.

      Considering the tech and training is all from Russia (and the US via espionage) I think "Go Russia and the USA!" is the best statement to make in response to this tragedy.

    43. Re:GO CHINA! by pmz · · Score: 1

      I would think that there are immediate problems down here on earth that need to be solved and spending lots of money on a really interesting dream may not be the best way to allocate scarce resources...

      If people never went out on a limb to test what is and is not possible or practical or worthwhile, then the world would be the most damn boring place imaginable. Humans are animals. Leave them with a big tit to suck off of, and that's all they'll do. Suck off the tit, get fat, and waste away. Just look at the obesity "epidemic" in the USA and other countries. People are getting lazier and lazier because it really doesn't take much work to get by anymore. People with crappy no-brainer jobs today live in apartments and drive reliable cars, watch TV 30 hours a week, and still manage to totally ignore their kids, because it is work.

    44. Re:GO CHINA! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'm just trying to figure out how the fact that Truman was a democrat had anything whatsoever to do with the price of tea in China. Are you suggesting that a Republican president in 1947 would not have opposed the Soviets?

      This is the classic fallacy of partisan politics: If something happens while one party is "in charge", it is the responsibility of that party forever. Silliness.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    45. Re:GO CHINA! by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the matrix. When Smith was talking to Morpheus about categorizing humans as bacteria and just {settling somewhere; multiplying; consuming all resources; and then moving somewhere else}do until(nothingleft(universe)). Also shows up in Independence day w/ it being the aliens instead of us. To keep this quote from being offtopiced: is this how you want to generalize our thirst for knowledge and science? A land/resource hungree bacterea?

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    46. Re:GO CHINA! by gorgon · · Score: 1
      Hey, I jumped into this thread late and I had nothing to do with dragging political party into. The AC a couple of posts above you dragged Reagan and Republicans into this. Then ninejaguar made the point that anti-Communist policy had been around for a while. Then you brought the Great Society into this ;).

      Anyway, I agree foreign policy goes across party lines and I didn't mean to suggest that Truman should get all the credit for winning the Cold War, just that Reagan gets way too much credit for it.

      A similar case could be made with regard to the World Trade Center hijackings. They weren't Bush's fault and even if Gore were President a lot of the government reaction after the fact probably would have rubbed many people the wrong way. That doesn't change the fact that I really wish someone else were President now. GWB's inability to work with the rest of the world make me long for McCain, Eisenhower, GHWB, or even Nixon.

      --

      And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
      Berke Breathed
    47. Re:GO CHINA! by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      I was demonstrating a similar point in answering the original poster's absurd statement:

      "Ronald Reagan put an end to the cold war. He was a Republican. Don't let your twisted little liberal mind forget that."

      I did this by introducing a counterpoint that didn't involve a "Republican" as the poster was emphasizing. We could trace global political manouverings to either party (and countries) forever, and realize that no action or statement or achievement is an island or truly original. Someone can always be pointed out to have laid the groundwork beforehand. At best, what can be claimed is an incremental gain in the overall achievement. If you're lucky, you can even pinpoint its state in time within the achievement's boundaries.

      = 9J =

    48. Re:GO CHINA! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Since Agent Smith's "species" was enslaving another sentient race, they don't get much in the way of a moral high ground. Having said that, The Matrix isn't exactly my barometer for what makes sense in terms of space exploration policy.

      Life grows. That's what it does. That's what it's for. Life brings order to chaos.

      Survival of the fittest. By definition, that species which survives, wins. If you don't think the human species should survive, well, you get to make that choice for yourself. The rest of us will continue to strive.

      Does it make sense for us, as a sentient species, to husband our resources carefully? Absolutely. Are we doing a very good job? No. But, to suggest that somehow we don't "deserve" to survive is absurd.

      Incidentally, your spelling and sentence structure atrocious almost to the point of unreadability. You really ought to work on that.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    49. Re:GO CHINA! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I was skimming, and missed that post. I shoulda jumped on him instead. Or as well. : )

      I still hate party politics. Sloppy thinking.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    50. Re:GO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many things that we take for granted, from instant beverages to those sweet foam mattresses to satellite TV and phone communication, were born out of the space program.

      At least the children who die of hunger know that the dollars not spent to help them, has enabled you to watch porn on your satelite TV, laying on your foam mattress and saving time with instant beverages

    51. Re:GO CHINA! by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      Shrub is clearly an imbecile. He needs to be replaced next election and his cronies need to be curbed before they drag us into a corner we can't manouver out of. There are frightening similarities between the current and Grant Administrations. The difference is we weren't a nuclear-capable super-power during the Grant Administration. The story: failed business man, wins war, picks a party (Republican in this case), becomes president, and gets mired in financial scandals.

      If you shuffle the order of events, you could very well put Shrub into that role, instead of Grant. No intentional insult to Grant in the comparison. In fact, I'd take Grant over Shrub any day. At least Grant had some success in foreign affairs.

      = 9J =

    52. Re:GO CHINA! by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      According to science, life does not bring order to chaos. From what I understand, chaos theory describes how over time organisms become more complex. It's in fact one of the interesting things that scientists ran into when trying to deal w/ the idea of having aliens land here. What if when they evolve the become simpler organisms? How would we deal with that. As for my english skills, thank god i dont have to take any more english classes. tough luck to all those who will read my stuff in the future.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    53. Re:GO CHINA! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Not exactly.

      Increased complexity!=increased chaos. 100 lbs of dirt is less complex and more chaotic than 100 lbs of pretty girl.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  23. Incredible by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    How long does freeze dried cat last?

    I hope this guy doesnt starve.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Incredible by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      If this is a failed attempt at a dog-eating joke, I'm exterminating humanity from the face of the earth in hopes that our next gene pool might not be defective.

    2. Re:Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot, stratjakt.

  24. Maybe a little bit morbid, but... by FireBird615 · · Score: 1

    What happens if they burn up on re-entry?

    *Sombre Offical Types*

    "He was a hero of the (insert equivalent of Hero Of The Soviet Union here)"

    1. Re:Maybe a little bit morbid, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens if they burn up on re-entry?

      Then the Chinese Space Program will conclude that paper, while an excellent material for kites, is a poor material for the construction of transorbital craft.

      [EXPLOITATION OF UNFAIR STEREOTYPES]

    2. Re:Maybe a little bit morbid, but... by FireBird615 · · Score: 1

      ROTFLMAO Hadn't thought of that one...

  25. Re:FUCK YOU TIMOTHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does your lover's spat with Timothy always spill over onto Slashdot? Can't you homos find a way to avoid being so public?

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. Umm... by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1

    Is anyone actually verifying this? Or are we just trusting the Chineese government that they have a man in space. I mean, is someone from a non-government controlled media outlet going to watch this guy land and climb out of the capsule?

    Seriously, if you think the Apollo moon landing conspiracies are bad...

    1. Re:Umm... by kscguru · · Score: 1
      Honestly, if they didn't actually put a man in space, the Chinese government would be stuck in the most embarassing scandal in its history. They have FAR more to lose by putting forward a fake than they do by actually spending the money.

      (Coincidentally, that's the argument I use against Apollo moon landing conspiracies. Funny to use it in this way too...)

      --

      A witty [sig] proves nothing. --Voltaire

  28. Congratulations china! by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Funny
    this is great news. if nothing else than the fact that the inidans reacted like this:

    Another view, expressed before the launch, comes from The Times of India, which in an editorial Monday called the Shenzhou 5 launch a "joke." "It would be better to call it China's Late Creep Forward, given that Beijing is attempting to showcase a four-decade-old technology. If this is China's idea of arriving, then it's come at a time when the other two spacefaring nations have left it light years behind," the publication said.

    Can you say green :-p anything that pisses off the indians is good in my book!
    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:Congratulations china! by tftp · · Score: 1
      anything that pisses off the indians is good in my book!

      I didn't know that you wrote (or lovingly own) the "Mein Kampf" :-(

    2. Re:Congratulations china! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      aside from godwin's law, just so you know, india was an axis ally during the war. The Inidan National army actively fought and helped the Japanese in burma.... now who were you accusing of being a nazi?

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    3. Re:Congratulations china! by tftp · · Score: 1
      who were you accusing of being a nazi?

      you, for what you promote today as a person, and not India who erred almost a century ago as a collective entity. Back then what historical experience of comparable magnitude could they draw upon? Not much. But today, having seen numerous dictators and tyrants and shauvinists of all colors and of all countries, a reasonable person should know better than to paint a fairly large (I'd say) country with the widest brush imaginable.

      What really matters is not who someone's grandfather fought (being forced to do so by his undemocratic government) almost a century ago. What matters is who _you_ fight today, and on what merit. And do not forget, you will be treated the same way you treat others; this law of nature seems to be a universal ancient wisdom.

    4. Re:Congratulations china! by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      If I were "owned" by another country as India was by England, I think I would join any damn group to get out from under a foreign power's existing yoke. Consider how you would feel, as the Indians did, to be treated by "superior" whites as second class citizens in your own country. Forget about being an Indian in a different Brittish colony. They weren't even considered human there. The Brittish at the time considered themselves a "master" race, and all others (inluding fellow Europeans) as less deserving of the title.

      = 9J =

    5. Re:Congratulations china! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      dude, you really need to get a grasp of history. no undemocraic gov forced th indians to fight for the axis they did it on their own. The actual gov there was teh british. I dont know if you are trolling or not, but if now, really need to pick up a good history book (from any side, the here fact is not disputed). I have no idea where you got allteh stuff in your little rant from, must have pulled itout of your ass becasue i couldnt even recognise the topic you were writing about. Oh BTW im not talking about grandpas and such the people who fought for the axis run the country today. Thus they dont celebrate VJ-Day.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    6. Re:Congratulations china! by The+Briguy · · Score: 1

      wha??? India was a british colony during World War II. The Indian army fought with the British, AGAINST the Japanese, in Burma. Gandhi himself (reluctantly) supported the British. I believe there were a very small number of defectors who fought in a special japanese regiment, but you can't say India was an axis ally during the war, by ANY stretch of the imagination.

    7. Re:Congratulations china! by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      India was part of the British Empire. The Viceroy had already declared for the Allied side in 1939.
      The "Indian National Army" was a revolutionary group organized by, among others, Subhas Chandra Bose, with support from Japan. Largely composed of POWs captured after the fall of Singapore, the INA was unsuccessful on the battlefield.

      Conversely, the much larger (2 million men vs 25,000) British Indian Army fought with distinction for the allies.

    8. Re:Congratulations china! by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yes, In North America, we prefer three-decade-old technology...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    9. Re:Congratulations china! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      huh? can you read? WTF are you repling to?

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    10. Re:Congratulations china! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      go read again what gandhi said, he was against the war and opposed the allies actions. When hitler started losing he said the allies should negotiate with hitler, he was always silent about hitler's crimes.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    11. Re:Congratulations china! by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      ...given that Beijing is attempting to showcase a four-decade-old technology...

      Now find a quiet corner and unknot your undies.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  29. Is it worth it? by why-is-it · · Score: 1

    While this is no small achievement, does it *really* matter? The space race ended some time ago...

    No doubt their are factions within the Chinese government who really want the propaganda coup, but is there any more to this than just some positive press?

    Good for them and all, and I hope their astronaut gets back in one piece. Yet I have to wonder if it's all worth it. I suspect that there are more important things that their goverment could spend money on. Parts of China are quite backwards, and surely the money could be better spent on solving immediate social and ecological problems there.

    In all fairness though, governments in many different nations have their spending priorities all messed up.

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    1. Re:Is it worth it? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Enter the new space race.

      Instead of wasting resources on social program moneysinks, China is opening the door to the next step in human space exploration.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    2. Re:Is it worth it? by schnits0r · · Score: 1

      Parts of China are quite backwards, and surely the money could be better spent on solving immediate social and ecological problems there.


      In all fairness though, governments in many different nations have their spending priorities all messed up.



      Like the $87 billion President Bush has asked Congress to appropriate for expenditures related to the military occupation and reconstruction of Iraq.


      For example:


      The UN estimates the cost of providing treatment and prevention in developing countries for tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and malaria at $12 billion a year.


      The WHO estimates that $27 billion a year, on TB, AIDS and malaria, as well as to eliminate other infectious diseases and nutritional deficiencies, could save 8 million lives a year. That's eight million lives. A year.


      The UN Development Program estimated in 1998 that the annual additional cost of achieving basic education for all was $6 billion.


      It would only cost $6 billion a year to provide health insurance to all uninsured children in the United States. You can provide Head Start and Early Head Start to all eligible children for $8 billion annually. You can reduce class size to 15 students per teacher in all first-, second- and third-grade classrooms for $11 billion a year.


      Now about those backwards spending priorities?

    3. Re:Is it worth it? by Really+Strange · · Score: 1

      China has significant social, economic, ecological and other problems. While China can now say that s/he has put a man in space, I have to wonder about the hundreds of millions of peasants without running water, the situation in Tibet (autonomy and the next Dalai Lama) and Xinjiang province (autonomy and muslim minority), large scale graft, etc. ad nauseum and ask whether the concept of "face" ("we are just as technically advanced as other major powers") is so significant as to take precedance over these other issues when making budgeting decisions.

    4. Re:Is it worth it? by Bearpaw · · Score: 1
      No doubt their are factions within the Chinese government who really want the propaganda coup, but is there any more to this than just some positive press?

      Sort of like most of the US projects through Apollo? (And, some would argue, the ISS.) Sure, they finally sent a real scientist along on Apollo 17 ... the last Apollo mission.

      In all fairness though, governments in many different nations have their spending priorities all messed up.

      Ain't that the truth. For instance, parts of the US are quite backwards, and $87billion dollars -- to pick a random amount -- surely could be better spent on social and ecological problems. Not that it would be ...

    5. Re:Is it worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll.. troll.. troll.. your boat

    6. Re:Is it worth it? by tftp · · Score: 1
      I have to wonder about the hundreds of millions of peasants without running water

      Neanderthals never developed agriculture because they wanted to solve their hunting problems first.

      Obviously, the government of China sees farther than its own nose. Good for them, good for us all.

    7. Re:Is it worth it? by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

      Would you like some cheese with your whine? Why don't you ask China for a few cents per person to solve those problems. What does all this have to do with China's sucessuful launch of a human into space? What the hell does it have to do with a paltry 89 billion dollars to build a demoracy in Iraq? Shit I forgot democracy is evil incarnate this is slashdot. All those backpeadling Democrats in congress who voted for this war and the sanctions and blockade that proceded it owe it to the Iraqi people. I for one congratulate the nation of China on their maned space flight program and wish them many more sucessful launches. I unlike you am not looking for a way to push my own flakey ass personal political agenda. Way to go China.

      --
      If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
      Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
    8. Re:Is it worth it? by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      Instead of wasting resources on social program moneysinks,

      Blah blah blah, whatever. Try and find even *one* _reputable_ economist who would agree with that statement.

      China is opening the door to the next step in human space exploration.

      For what purpose? We cannot manage the affairs of our own planet...

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    9. Re:Is it worth it? by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      Exactly! The problem is that the areas in which we could make the biggest difference don't generate good photo-ops or publicity. We are able to view poverty and homelessness in our own cities with total indifference. It is no great wonder that we are oblivious to the fact that thousands of children die each and every day because they lack the basic necessities of life. Necessities that we take completely for granted.

      It isn't just the first world that has screwed up priorities. It is absolutely immoral that Pakistan and India should divert resources to a Nuclear weapons program when the needs of their own citizens are so great.

      GWB wants to spend another $87 billion to fight terrorism. That would purchase a lot of books, medicine and food for people who have nothing compared to us.

      I wish I had some mod points for your post.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    10. Re:Is it worth it? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 0

      That really depends on what you define as backwards. I would venture to say that even the most backwards of places in the US is better then many places in third world countries

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    11. Re:Is it worth it? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of resources to exploit in space. As technology improves, it will become cost effective to do so.

      Keep whining about how you need "free" drugs, education, etc. While you seek to leech off of society, the chinese are busy becoming the pre-eminent industrial power on earth.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  30. Scientific American article by cwolfsheep · · Score: 1
    --

    Life is irony, and nothing ever goes as planned.
  31. NASA's Offical Reply by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2, Informative

    NASA's offical response:

    NASA Administrator Marks China's Space Milestone

    The following is a statement from NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe about China's first successful human space flight.

    "This launch is an important achievement in the history of human exploration. China, after Russia and the United States, is only the third nation to successfully launch humans into space.

    "The Chinese people have a long and distinguished history of exploration. NASA wishes China a continued safe human space flight program.

    What their real response (measure in actions, not press-relases) remains to be seen, of course.

    1. Re:NASA's Offical Reply by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      "The Chinese people have a long and distinguished history of exploration.

      Odd. I was never taught anything in school about China's exploration. In fact, I remember learning that while Europe was going power-crazy and grasping for more land, China minded its own business...

      Don't get me wrong. This is a GOOD thing, and I wish that the US would learn to do the same

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:NASA's Offical Reply by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      No, the Chinese were quite adventurous during Europe's Middle Age. They were exploring the Indian Ocean as far as the Cape of Good Hope. But a change of leadership brought a change of policy. My understanding is that they exploration wasn't yeilding enough immediate benefits, so they basically cancelled it. Leaving the Europeans free to explore and profit later.

    3. Re:NASA's Offical Reply by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      you are joking right? china were the first major explorers centuries ahead of europe. there was a major decilne in chinese abilitya round teh time europe began to rise. Chinese had ships taht could have vistied america.. whether they did or not is up for debate but the ability was there, no need denying it

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    4. Re:NASA's Offical Reply by CommandNotFound · · Score: 3, Informative
      Odd. I was never taught anything in school about China's exploration. In fact, I remember learning that while Europe was going power-crazy and grasping for more land, China minded its own business...

      Me too, until I read Landes' _The Wealth and Poverty Of Nations_, which is a fascinating economic view of history of the past thousand years. The Chinese pretty much had the Europeans beaten in shipbuilding:
      "[...] The biggest were about 400 feet long, 160 feet wide (compare the 85 feet of Columbus's Santa Maria), had nine staggered masts and twelve square sails of red silk."
      "[...] The first of these fleets, that of the eunuch admiiral Zheng He (Cheng-ho) in 1405, consisted of 317 vessels and carried 28,000 men. [...] In this way, over a period of three years [1404-1407], the Chinese built or refitted some 1,681 ships. Medieval Europe could not have conceived of such an armada."
      After this, they pulled inward, but I never learned about the previous achievements until adulthood.
    5. Re:NASA's Offical Reply by Bushcat · · Score: 1
      I was never taught anything in school about China's exploration

      Well that's not the fault of the Chinese, I think.

      In the early 1400's Cheng Ho (Zheng He) made 7 voyages towards the western world, reaching Africa. He took more than 27,000 people in 320+ ships with him on some voyages. The largest ships weighed 1500 tons, were 180 meters long, and held 1000 people. See here to see how vastly larger a treasure ship was than the Santa Maria, built 87 years later.

    6. Re:NASA's Offical Reply by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The Chinese turned inwards for several reasons. Others who expanded beat them. Maybe this be a lesson for you: if Earthlings do not expand to space, someone else will expand here. It may take 10, 100, 1000, 10000 years. But it will happen.

    7. Re:NASA's Offical Reply by WoTG · · Score: 1

      Funny how those who write the history books get to influence history itself, eh? Orwell would be proud. =)

      Yeah, I didn't know a whole lot about China's exploration until it came up in passing in a university course...

      It's a pitty that what little I do know has been pretty much covered by the other responses to your post, it means that I should probably add another book or two to my "to be read" list.

    8. Re:NASA's Offical Reply by posdnous · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wouldn't say that the chinese stopped the exploration because of lack of immediate benefits, you must realise that the whole point of Zheng Ho's voyages were not to conquer or trade with new people's but to "show" off the majesty of chinese civilisation.

      When a new civilisation was encountered, the chinese would often demand tribute, the chinese weren't really interested in trade with other nations at all. So really it was more a situation not dissimilar to the US space program, more like been there, done that, lets move on.

    9. Re:NASA's Offical Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is a GOOD thing, and I wish that the US would learn to do the same"

      But they are! They are going power-crazy and grasping for more land.

    10. Re:NASA's Offical Reply by pmz · · Score: 1

      What their real response (measure in actions, not press-relases) remains to be seen, of course.

      I predict another race to the moon or to Mars within twenty years.

  32. First single flyer since 1960s. by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of interest, I believe this is the first time since 1969 that a single person has traveled alone in space. Every US flight since Mercury has had at least 2 people, the last 1 person flight was when the Soyuz was being validated.

    Sadly, Komarov (the pilot of Soyuz 1) died when his spacecraft impacted the ground. I hope this brave Chinese pilot will have better luck.

    TAIKONAUTS GO!

    1. Re:First single flyer since 1960s. by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      Well, technically the CMP of Apollo 17 (you know, the poor guy who had to stay behind in the Apollo capsule while the other two were off on the moon) would have been the last solo flyer, which puts it about 1972.

      Certainly it wasn't a solo launch, but you have to appreciate someone who is flying behind the moon, solo, with no human contact whatsoever. The CMPs of Apollo 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 for a time were more "alone" than any other person in the history of mankind.

    2. Re:First single flyer since 1960s. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Komarov's death is a case study in why not to blame us engineers. His capsule would not stop spinning in space, and he cursed over the radio at the engineers who built it. They got their revenge, however, as they had apparently packed the parachutes in the craft upside-down - the 'chutes did a cigarette roll all the way to the ground. So folks, treat your engineers well.

    3. Re:First single flyer since 1960s. by Charlton+Heston · · Score: 1

      Nope, try 1984 when an astronaut using the MMU orbited all by his lonesome.

      --
      Get your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape
    4. Re:First single flyer since 1960s. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, they can tell the future too...

    5. Re:First single flyer since 1960s. by Nit+Picker · · Score: 1

      I think Yang has gotten past the hurdle that ultimately killed Komarov. His craft experienced some sort of control/power probem from the start.

      Incidently, if I remember correctly, Komarov almost pulled it all out manually, but was killed when he was unable to jetison the retrorockets before landing and they exploded.

  33. Space Race by Bud+Higgins · · Score: 1

    This is exactly the boost that NASA needs to get started again. Hopefully they will be able to shed all of their bureaucracy and do some real engineering. BTW I hope that that China's rocket doesn't fail because it is built with stolen US designs.

  34. Re:Nice Troll, but... by Narphorium · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So how do you propose that they sart their space program? Should they have just started with a manned mission to Mars?
    I don't think its very practical to suggest that just because a couple of countries have already done it, that anyone who now wishes to start a space program of their own are obliged to break new ground on their very first manned mission.

  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. Congratulations, China by nacturation · · Score: 1

    Now to hope that they got everything right for a safe return. Not much chance of making repairs if they didn't.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  37. Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by RocketJeff · · Score: 5, Informative

    Taikonaut was the term coined by an American (IIRC) observer of the Chinese program. The Chinese use "Yuhangyuan" which is closer to a proper translation of astronaut.

    Taikonaut was formed by taking the Chinese Chinese word for 'Space' and adding the '-onaut' ending.

    1. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SO FUCKING WHAT?

    2. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by SoupaFly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how dare someone try to educate you!

      Ass.

    3. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would I be right in guessing the russian term is not "cosmonaut" either?

    4. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by RocketJeff · · Score: 1

      No, the Russian term is cosmonaut. European languages (incl. English) and Russian share quite a few words and also tend to create words in the same way.

      It doesn't work well to use the same 'rules' with Chinese (or most Asian) languages.

    5. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

      > Taikonaut was formed by taking the Chinese Chinese word for 'Space' and adding the '-onaut' ending. It's actually "Tai Kon" for "space" in Chinese, what they added was "-aut". It's pretty redundant to argue over how to call the Chinese astronauts tho, since even the Chinese don't care a lot about that. If you go the CCTV's website we (yes I'm a Chinese) just call him as astronaut. http://www.cctv.com.cn/english/index.shtml

    6. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by dapic · · Score: 1

      "yu-huang-yuan" = astronaut
      "tai-kong-ren" = spaceman

    7. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh, Radio China Internation broacasting out of BEIJING calls them Taikonoauts in their English broadcast.

      So shut yer yap fuckio.

    8. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by rofa · · Score: 1

      Well, I WAS wondering about this, because in the year 2243 when close to every nation has sent someone to space, there will be a hell of a lot of different words for "[astro|kosmo|taiko]naut" and translations. Unless one gets shot throuth a wormhole and brings us the translator microbes...

      --
      No sig. Go away.
    9. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      I think it's pretty sad, and stupid to have a seperate english word for people of different nationalities in space. Somehow it gives a sense of seperation as if people of different nationalities are somehow different while in space.

      The Russian word Cosmonaut made a little bit of sense since that's the Russian word for Astronaut. Taikonaut is just ridiculous, and I hope it dies quickly. The whole thing just sounds like cold-war politics to me.

      --
      AccountKiller
    10. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

    11. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      And how well do you expect Americans to pronounce "Yuhangyuan"?

    12. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by mclove · · Score: 1

      Easy: you-hahng-yooan

    13. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by forii · · Score: 1

      and the intonation for each syllable is...?

    14. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by cehardin · · Score: 1

      Hehe, not even close

      it's more like
      U-HENG-U-N

      The sounds they make are nothing like our English sounds though, so the above is still not perfect. Pretty close though.

    15. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by interiot · · Score: 1

      As soon as they start helping with the International Space Station, then we can consider them one and the same. For now, they're being as secretive about their space program as possible (they had to tell the world that they were about to launch a manned space mission so we didn't mistake it for a nuke).

    16. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking idiot STFU

    17. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Basje · · Score: 1

      spelled like that, it sounds like orangutan. Let's keep it at taikonaut, please.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    18. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Without "Us vs Them", and their respective labels, what do we got left? Boredom. :)

      Petty nationalism (aka: tribalism) won't go away until our old genes and memes can be (artificially) adapted to cooperate more as a global whole, rather than compete. Even if resources were as abundant as a StarTrek replicator in every household, there'd still be irrational conflicts and primal powerlust screwing up the works unless we do some intelligent redesign.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    19. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Taikonaut was the term coined by an American (IIRC) observer of the Chinese program. The Chinese use "Yuhangyuan" which is closer to a proper translation of astronaut.

      Then the term is taikonaut, since we're speaking English and not Chinese. More likely, the term will be astronaut, but of taikonaut and yuhangyuan, the one that has a chance to formally enter the English language is taikonaut.

    20. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a crock of shit. And that's all I have to say.

    21. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noones fucking with my genes. I talk to people on the 'net all the time, and it proves to me that everyone out there are all the same no matter where they are from.

    22. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by jejones · · Score: 1

      I agree; surely one can just qualify "astronaut" with the appropriate proper adjective when it's needed. We didn't bother to find and use the Hebrew word for astronaut for the Israeli member of the Columbia's crew (alevasholem), did we?

      (Besides, when I first heard the word, it sounded like someone was riding a really big drum into space...)

    23. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by varjag · · Score: 1

      The Russian word Cosmonaut made a little bit of sense since that's the Russian word for Astronaut.

      No, the Russian word Cosmonaut is the Russian word for Cosmonaut. Astronaut was coined later by Americans, but it is a word of its own in Russian language.

      And both words were formed from Latin:

      Cosmonaut = Space Traveller
      Astronaut = Stellar Traveller

      In this context, Taikonaut is a bit off.

      --
      Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    24. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Viceice · · Score: 1

      the english version maybe, but not in orginal Malay. Literally, 'Orang' means person and 'utan' is 'Hutan' which means jungle in Malay (or Indonesian, depending on which side of the region you're in, but it has the same origin.)

      Orangutan is pronunced or-rung-u-tonne here, not or-rang-a-tang

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    25. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Viceice · · Score: 1

      simple. You Hang Man.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    26. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      But as you'll recall, Russian space explorers are called cosmonauts, which clearly separates them from good-old-American astronauts. This labelling nonsense is more about national politics than anything else!

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    27. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by stereoroid · · Score: 1

      Even in the West, doesn't Taikonaut refer to Japan? I thought Sinaut might be a better name for him..!

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
    28. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      In Taiwan, the word is Tai Kong Ren for astronaut. Yu hang yuan sounds like some funky Star Trek term. But, hey, I learned my Chinese in Taiwan.

    29. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Yu hang yuan' is 'astronaut' in the sense of one that pilots the spaceship. 'Tai kong ren' would make more sense when talking about walking on the moon, floating in space, etc.

    30. Re:Not "Taikonaut", the term is "Yuhangyuan" by danila · · Score: 1

      No. Soviet space exploreres were called cosmonauts, which was a well-though out and descriptive name. When the USA managed to launch a human (an American) into orbit years later, American space exploreres were called astronauts, which is, of course, nonsense, because last time I checked a manned mission to another star was not even on the drawing table at NASA. So yes, it's about national politics nonsense, but in the US, not in Russia or China.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  38. Good Luck, Godspeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Let's hope the next several hours are uneventful.

    I have nothing but the utmost respect for anyone brave enough to attempt such a thing.

  39. Congratulations by flikx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Another superpower sends a man on a dangerous mission to circle the planet at a mere 60 kilometers altitude. All this while ignoring extreme oppression, famine, and poverty at home. Only this time, it was accomplished with 30+ year old technology. Way to go China. Let me know when we see actual space travel; not another sputnik.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  40. ObKentBrockman by eap · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our Chinese overlords. Let's all hope they don't set us up the bomb while they're up there.

  41. Both tricky... by Goonie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're both tricky. America's had accidents in both phases. In fact, the "staying alive whilst up there" part is pretty tough too - remember Apollo 13?

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Both tricky... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but Apollo 13 kind of shows how much easier it is to recover from accidents once in space. All three astronauts survived *that* mishap. I can't think of any equivelently serious malfunction while launching or landing that didn't kill the crew.

      (Also, note how many probes have had glitches while cruising in space and recovered versus how many have recovered from take-off or landing mistakes.)

    2. Re:Both tricky... by RevRigel · · Score: 1

      Russian Soyuz has had successful crew ejections when the booster rocket exploded on launch: here.

    3. Re:Both tricky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Apollo 13 showed how urine is funny when it's in space.

    4. Re:Both tricky... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but Apollo 13 kind of shows how much easier it is to recover from accidents once in space. All three astronauts survived *that* mishap. I can't think of any equivelently serious malfunction while launching or landing that didn't kill the crew.
      There have been four or five significant launch accidents.. Apollo 12, no loss of crew. Challeger, all crew lost. STS-?? (loss of SSME on ascent), no loss of crew. Not to mention the two times the Soviet's have had a booster explode, and both times the launch escape system functioned perfectly, pluss the time the booster stages failed to seperate, but the spacecraft seperated from the booster and the crew survived.

      Landing accidents are a bit murkier, simply because there have been so few of them. Four significant Soviet failures, two resulting in loss of crew, one American, resulting in loss of crew.
    5. Re:Both tricky... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      How about that lightning strike on one of the Apollo missions that essentially shut down nearly every electronic device in the capsule? One of the astronauts pressed the magic button*, and all was well.

      What a time to realize that your exhaust plume acts as a ground rod!

      * Supposedly the magic button was a rarely used switch that only one of the astronauts remembered was there. Thank goodness he did.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    6. Re:Both tricky... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      I'd point out that Apollo 1 also is a launch failure. They were doing a sort of a dry run before the actual launch, but it was the same set of conditions as launch and the failure would have cropped up in the same way.

      There also countless cases of unmanned launch disasters where the payload didn't survive. The priority for saving the payload is much less in that case, but the fact that it isn't evidently deemed worthwhile to add an ejection system for a multi-million (or even a billion) dollar spacecraft is, I think, indicative that it isn't that cheap/easy to manage.

    7. Re:Both tricky... by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      so you compile your program, and start testing. you find a bug. do you call it a product failure too?

      the apollo 1 fire happened during simulation (testing, training). not a launch failure.

    8. Re:Both tricky... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      I do if it kills three astronuats in a situation that was only different from the real launch in that they didn't intent to actual light the thing. If they hadn't been training shortly before the intended launch, the accident would have happened during the lanuch itself. Therefore, I see no difference between the two in terms of evaulating the ease and safety of launch.

    9. Re:Both tricky... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I'd point out that Apollo 1 also is a launch failure. They were doing a sort of a dry run before the actual launch, but it was the same set of conditions as launch and the failure would have cropped up in the same way.
      No. The failure (shorted insulation) could have happened during routine (normal atmosphere) testing as well. It also could have happened at the factory. Or in worst case, it might have happened on orbit.
      There also countless cases of unmanned launch disasters where the payload didn't survive.
      Countless is a word that sounds awfully scary, but the reality is the failure rate is fairly stable at about 2% of launch attempts.
      The priority for saving the payload is much less in that case, but the fact that it isn't evidently deemed worthwhile to add an ejection system for a multi-million (or even a billion) dollar spacecraft is, I think, indicative that it isn't that cheap/easy to manage.
      No. It's both fairly cheap *and* fairly easy to manage. The problem is that it costs a great deal of weight, and hence performance. Since an unmanned payload can be replaced by insurance, and the failure rate is so low, there is no incentive to take the payload/performance hit.
    10. Re:Both tricky... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      The failure (shorted insulation) could have happened during routine (normal atmosphere) testing as well.

      I continue to maintain: the short would have shown up in the actual launch when that system went active. It obviously didn't cause problems in the factory (because that's not when the failure occured) and the spacecraft never would have *made* it to orbit. If a system is goign to fail, it'll fail the first time the conditions are right. For many, that's launch. Ergo, this was a launch failure.

      Saying that the problem could have occured elsewhere doesn't change that it did occur in a launch situation (if only a training exercise). You can argue about when you personally think the failure might also have occured, but it doesn't change the data that are in front of you: it occured on the launch pad during a simulated launch situation.

      Countless is a word that sounds awfully scary, but the reality is the failure rate is fairly stable at about 2% of launch attempts.

      I'm drawing on on my gradute spacecraft instrumentation course from a few years ago, here, but the Delta IV's launch failure rate is around one in twenty. Which is more like 5%. And that's relatively good compared to some other systems.

      Since an unmanned payload can be replaced by insurance, and the failure rate is so low, there is no incentive to take the payload/performance hit.

      Yeah, I'm sure that Cassini is fully insured, as was the Russian Mars mission (Mars 96, was it?) that ended up in the drink. Insurance doesn't cover everything, and even if you're covered, it doesn't make up for the time you lose when you're rebuilding the spacecraft.

    11. Re:Both tricky... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I continue to maintain: the short would have shown up in the actual launch when that system went active.
      Which short? Where? The simple fact of the matter is we don't know which wiring bundle shorted, when or when the damage was done. (We don't even know if it *was* a short, as opposed to overheating from the wire being nicked or a bad connector.)
      It obviously didn't cause problems in the factory (because that's not when the failure occured) and the spacecraft never would have *made* it to orbit.
      No, it did not fail at the factory, but there were numerous problems in capsule processing, both before and after if was installed on the S-IB. Given the extensive amount of sloppy workmanship found throughout the capsule, the failure could have happened at any one of a thousand locations, at almost any time in the processing sequence. To claim it could only have failed when it did is to ignore the evidence at hand.
      If a system is goign to fail, it'll fail the first time the conditions are right. For many, that's launch. Ergo, this was a launch failure.
      For very few is 'that launch', that's why extensive prelaunch testing is done. Apollo 1 didn't happen 'at launch', it happened during prelaunch processing, ergo your logic chain fails. (Not matter how much you handwave and claim that it was a 'simulated launch', there are significant differences between the training/checkout excersise they were conducting and an actual launch.)
      I'm drawing on on my gradute spacecraft instrumentation course from a few years ago, here, but the Delta IV's launch failure rate is around one in twenty. Which is more like 5%.
      You must be thinking of the Delta III or some other booster, because the Delta IV (in all it's variants) hasn't even *flown* twenty times yet. Actually, looking at the Delta's flight history, the Delta III didn't fly twenty times either... So let's look at the whole Delta *family*... Oops, not one in twenty, more like one in twenty five to thirty, and the vast majority of those concentrated early in the program. The workhorse Delta II has had a straight string of almost *sixty* sucessful launches. Either your memory is faulty or your professor ignorant.

      The simple truth is that no current launch system that has enough launches to constitute a valid statistical base has a failure rate outside the 2-4% range, with most clustered towards 2%.
      Yeah, I'm sure that Cassini is fully insured, as was the Russian Mars mission (Mars 96, was it?) that ended up in the drink.
      Goverments have enough money that they typically 'self-insure', as opposed to buying a policy. In the olden days it was not unusual to buy a whole series of birds as backup, and to have to fly one of those backups because the primary went in the drink. (MGO in fact has a considerable amount of backup MCO hardware integrated into it's design.) Given the current rate of launch reliability, backup spacecraft are less likely to be needed.
    12. Re:Both tricky... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      No offense, but I'll trust my professors, who have flown multiple spacecraft for NASA, over you're estimate of the failure rates. That 1 in 20 is the number we were given, and I believe them.

      And I'm not handwaving, you're just refusing to comprehend: the Apollo 1 fire occured during a simulated launch. It was NOT a test of the equipment. If they'd been testing the equipment, they wouldn't have had the crew on board in the first place. (If you're trying to see if some equipment will go wrong, you don't want extra people in the way, potentially getting hurt.)

      And you're still not getting the point of where it failed. It failed on the pad, as it would have in launch had they not decided to do a dry run. We're not here to speculate about where it could have failed, we're looking at data. The data say it failed during a launch simulation. You can speculate as much as you like about where you would like to think it might have failed in another universe, but the data says, "It happened on the pad." End of discussion.

      Finally: I promise you, the US government did NOT insure Cassini in ANY sense of the word. The spacecraft, like Galileo before it, costed better than a billion dollars. If NASA had flubbed it, they probably would have never gotten the money to do it again. Certainly not anytime remotely soon. Even the Mars missions, cheaper and better-funded though they are, aren't replaced as such. Even if they fly a similar instrument, it takes years for that to go up again. If they could avoid this easily and cheaply by saving the spacecraft via an ejection system, they would.

    13. Re:Both tricky... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      No offense, but I'll trust my professors, who have flown multiple spacecraft for NASA, over you're estimate of the failure rates. That 1 in 20 is the number we were given, and I believe them.
      No offense, but my numbers are verifiable. Simply google "delta IV launch history" and exercise some intelligence. Your professors numbers a laughably wrong, *period*. (Want proof? Try this link.)
      And I'm not handwaving, you're just refusing to comprehend: the Apollo 1 fire occured during a simulated launch. It was NOT a test of the equipment.
      And what is a simulated launch but a test? It's not a launch, and it's not a training exercise, so what is it?
      If they'd been testing the equipment, they wouldn't have had the crew on board in the first place.
      It's quite common to test human operated equipment with humans operating the equipment. Given that nearly every astronaut biography discusses the hours the spend in their capsules testing them, I wonder who is right? (Michael Collins's Carrying the Fire is the one most often recommended for beginners.)
      (If you're trying to see if some equipment will go wrong, you don't want extra people in the way, potentially getting hurt.)
      This is where you have things backwards. They were not trying to see if something would go wrong, but trying to make sure that everything would go *right* when they actually attempted to launch. ('Plugs out' testing is a standard part of launch processing right down to today. It's a final test to ensure that all the systems are ready to support a launch. This image shows the crew of STS-4 walking out to do just such a test.)
      We're not here to speculate about where it could have failed, we're looking at data.
      You are 100% correct, we are looking at the data. And the data is quite murky at best. We don't know the exact cause of the fire, and the statement "it would have failed on the pad" is unsupported by evidence.
  42. kick the US space program back into gear.... by catbutt · · Score: 1

    I don't get that....I mean, the US did what China is doing 40+ years ago....what, do we need to spend billions and billions more just for the sake of national pride, to show how far ahead of another country we are? Seems a bad reason to me.

    (btw, congratulations China!)

  43. A big congratulations to the Chinese Space Program by Teancum · · Score: 1

    If the announcement has been made, it has been successful. Time to pop the champaign and give a solid salute on a major accomplishment.

    For those in the United States, ABC News television program NightLine is doing a special 1 hour program on the subject. There are web links to the story on that page as well. This should be an interesting program to watch, and seeing it on television does bring some reality to the whole thing rather than reading about it on Slashdot. It is also nice to see the mainstream press talk about this stuff as well.

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. Re:Nice Troll, but... by suso · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'm being serious (not a troll). I would have thought that other countries would have been sending manned missions to space back in the 80s or 90s at least. I guess other countries just aren't interested?

  46. The Hardware Design is Serious by Tewley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's an article by James Oberg, space expert, on the spacecraft hardware design decisions the Chinese have made. To sum it up -- they are indeed very serious about being in this game for the long haul (or Long March, whatever).

    They took their sweet time for a very good reason, and have every intention of leapfrogging past the mistakes of the US and Russians. Slow and steady wins the race.

    1. Re:The Hardware Design is Serious by hnjjz · · Score: 1

      Nice article, thanks for the link. It looks like China is really planning for some great things in space, and not just a one-shot ego boost. Hopefully they'll make enough progress in a short time frame to really light a fire under NASA's ass!

  47. Slashdot posters show true colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot believe how many blatantly offensive remarks are being posted here and being modded up. I am really offended and /. has really lost a lot of respect from me. You think it's funny but it shows the sort of mind set people asians have to constantly deal with. You may think coding and hacking makes you smart people, but you're really quite stupid in so many other respects.

    No one throws these idiotic remarks around when a white nation does something of note. The Chinese have done something worthwhile and admirable, and yet you still can't offer anything but crap in response.

    You must be so proud of yourselves for being smart enough to dig up offensive remarks like these.

  48. Re:FUCK YOU FUCK TIMOTHY FUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YEAH FUCK MOD PARENT FUCK THE FUCK UP FUCK.

    (here are some fucking useless lowercase fucking letters to get past the lame fuckass lameness cocksnot filter fuck shit bitch cunt)

  49. Tremendous Waste of Resources by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    When it becomes worthwhile to go into space, people and companies will do so. Be it the US, Russia, or China, government backed programs like this are done about as inefficiently as they can be. I recall a story on /. a while back where some college students assembled a satallite for a few grand when it would have cost the government millions. Anyone got that link?

    And China doing it - this is just a poor starving commie dictatorship trying to make everyone forget it's nothing more than a poor, starving commie dictatorship. Sort of like the ghetto kids wearing $200 sneakers.

    1. Re:Tremendous Waste of Resources by RedFive · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit annoyed that Australia send A$50m in foreign aid each year to a country with its own manned spaceflight program....

      --
      RedFive jedi_knight111@hotmail.com
    2. Re:Tremendous Waste of Resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a bit annoyed that Australia send A$50m in foreign aid each year to a country with its own manned spaceflight program....

      Yeah, we wouldn't want them to spend that money on advancing themselves and possibly making themselves self sufficient.

    3. Re:Tremendous Waste of Resources by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      And China doing it - this is just a poor starving commie dictatorship trying to make everyone forget it's nothing more than a poor, starving commie dictatorship.
      As several people pointed out to me in a different thread, China has the world's 6th largest economy by GDP, 2nd largest by purchasing power, and far and away the fastest growing of the top ten economies. They are a net exporter of food. Certainly they are farther behind on a per capita basis, but on a total basis, of the top ten economies in the world, they may be better able to afford a space program than anyone.

      It seems a little hypocritical to criticize China for not putting all its money into poverty relief. Check out the economic status in areas like Appalachia at the time NASA started the moon program in the 60's. Nor are we immune to the same criticism today -- the world's richest country and 20M people live in poverty and 40M people have no health insurance against catestrophic illness.

      Yep, they're still a commie dictatorship. I'm going to class at the University of Colorado with someone from China who would much rather be studying dance or art, but the central planners decided that they needed economists, and that she should be one of them.

    4. Re:Tremendous Waste of Resources by RedFive · · Score: 1

      Actually its being spent on basic health care and feeding them - things they should spend their OWN money on first before putting a man in space

      --
      RedFive jedi_knight111@hotmail.com
    5. Re:Tremendous Waste of Resources by tftp · · Score: 1
      the central planners decided that they needed economists, and that she should be one of them

      Every cloud has a silver lining. By hhoosing the recommended occupation she has a better chance to find a job. Even the worst government planner can reasonably predict future demand for certain professions given the necessary data. Even I can tell that a good accountant won't starve in any country, especially in a fast growing one.

      The opposite is evident in the USA. Many people study social sciences (and universities readily take their money and teach them), but there is no demand, so where do these art majors end up?

      Of course, if she was given an ultimatum "become an accountant, or be shot" then that wouldn't be nice. But I doubt very much that this was the case. Large, bureaucratic governments don't pay that close attention to mere people.

      Probably the ticket to University of Colorado had this requirement attached; but that is hardly unexpected - they pay for her tuition, so they get to choose what she studies. Otherwise she is free to switch to anything she desires, as long as she can pay for the pleasure. Or she could stay at home and be intellectually free; that would work too.

    6. Re:Tremendous Waste of Resources by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      Even the worst government planner can reasonably predict future demand for certain professions given the necessary data.
      I'm just suspicious of central planners. Would a bureaucrat have allowed my case? I spent 25 years doing systems analysis and applied research in the telecom and cable field, essentially within one company. When my position was eliminated by industry consolidation (along with 1700 of my associates), I decided that I had accumulated enough wealth that I could go back to school and study something completely different. So I'm an economics graduate student, and twice as old as the rest of the students. Or would the bureaucrat have said, "Graduate school is for 23 year-olds -- you must continue to work, go to this place and push buttons."

      I'm interested in the economics of aging populations -- not just because it's my own personal situation, but because so many countries will be faced with that problem in the future. Even China, although it will take them longer to get there. Their population growth has been checked (by rather draconian laws), they are becoming rich enough to afford much better health care, so 40 years from now they will have to deal with the problems that come with a large fraction of the population having reached "retirement" age.

    7. Re:Tremendous Waste of Resources by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      It's not hypocritical for criticizing China for it's spending as I am equally critical of the US, though the US more or less needed to be involved in a space program during the cold war as it was a potential combat theatre.

      The point is, no government should be involved in these "show of force" projects. When the market finds a value in mining the moon or in scientific studies, space programs will manifest themselves and at least be profitable

    8. Re:Tremendous Waste of Resources by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      It's not hypocritical for criticizing China for it's spending as I am equally critical of the US, though the US more or less needed to be involved in a space program during the cold war as it was a potential combat theatre.
      Absolutely, it's not hypocritical to criticize China's space program if you criticize all space programs on the same grounds. My perception of the article to which I originally responded was that the author was asserting that China was too "poor" to afford a manned space program, but that other countries were not. I can even buy the cold war argument as it relates to LEO or MEO, but not to the moon. An attack launched by the Soviet Union from the moon may be unstoppable (see Heinlein's Moon is a Harsh Mistress for an early treatment of the difficulty of intercepting things approaching the planet at escape velocity), but is clearly visible coming for a few days in advance, and mutually-assured-destruction makes that a failing stragety.
      When the market finds a value in mining the moon or in scientific studies, space programs will manifest themselves and at least be profitable
      I would actually argue that some aspects of the space program have social value that might justify the government expense -- weather satellites that aid in accurately predicting hurricane landfalls, and the savings in human life and property damage due to adequate preparation, for example. Also, government funding of the R&D for putting birds in geosynchronous orbit made it possible for Dish and DirecTV to be profitable applications -- but they almost certainly wouldn't be if they had to develop their own orbit capability.
    9. Re:Tremendous Waste of Resources by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      "some aspects of the space program have social value that might justify the government expense"

      And there is the nexus of our disagreement. The burden for funding these programs, along with regulations, make it almost impossible for anything other than government to fund these kinds of risky, massive projects. Perhaps if a company were permitted to keep 95% of what they earned on a project rather than 50%, and that investors were able to keep all of their capital gain and not be double taxed, and a rediculous and scientifically dubious environmental impact study did not have have to be passed, and the companies workers could keep more of their income, persuading more and talented workers to join in the project, and they were allowed to have performance rather than design specifications from OSHA, the gov't wouldn't be the only organization that COULD launch satallites initially.

      On a side note, I consider the moon landing a worthwhile investment as a moral and stature booster in a war against the greatest evil of the day.

  50. News Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The race was over in 1969.

    The party is long over. China is arriving while everybody has left.

  51. How will the world react in the long-term? by Dukeofshadows · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I congratulate the Chinese on their achievement, it is truly awesome for them to put a man in orbit. However I have to wonder about how the world, especially the US, will react in the long-term to an accelerating Chinese space program. Mayalsia has announced that it wants to send a cosmonaut up to the ISS, India has hinted that it wants a manned space program, Japan has a shuttle in the works, and the European Space Agency has yet to even plan for manned space travel after the Hermes shuttle failed to materialize.

    Overall this may be the spark of a new space race. No one wants to see their neighbors achieve a presence in space that they cannot reach, thus we open the door for half-a-dozen groups to begin sending men into space for political and scientific purposes. China has already announced that they intend to build their own station in orbit to compete with the ISS, and old USSR/Russian technology/training is for sale to whoever can afford it (India, ESA, USA, etc.). If manned spacefaring technology is truly the passport to being a first-rate power of the 21st century, we will see almost every nation with ballistic missile technology attempting at least some sort of manned spaceflight capacity.

    Thus a new space race may prove detrimental since most of the technology is dual-use. No doubt, it would be uber-cool to have observatories on the backside of the moon and a space station comparable to those seen only in sci-fi platforms thus far. Microwave solar power systems like those under development at the University of Kyoto could solve most of the world's power problems. Yet these also become quite potent orbital weapons capable of incinerating missile silos, labs, and cities is "accidentally misalinged". Space rockets were ballistic missiles, and the whole of composite materials, microcomputers, velcro, and hosts od other civilican and military discoveries trace their way back to the Space Race of the 1960s.

    At worst we might be seeing the beginnings of a new arms race. Hopefully the initiative by China will evolve into an independent space station that goads India, Japan, the ESA, and USA to seriously pump funding back into their own programs and develop the spacefaring technology of 2001 by 2051. Maybe whoever said, "the 1960s were a decade transplanted from the 21st century because of the space race" will be proven right after all. If the US does not get off its duff soon, we may see a Chinese camera on the moon looking at two taikonauts wondering whether to take down the American flag still found at the Sea of Tranquility before we know it.

    Anyone else have any thoughts/comments?

    --
    As long as there is a Second Amendment, there will always be a First Amendment.
    1. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by encebollado · · Score: 1

      I would love a new space race. I just watched Apollo 13 again and I was wishing that I could have been alive that night when Armstrong stepped foot on another world. What drama and what achievement! I think the world, or at least the US, could use some grand and positive goal like the race to the moon was. The government should be inspiring dreamers instead of putting thousands of soldiers in harms way.

    2. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Anyone else have any thoughts/comments?

      Today, the physicists who participate in watching the most formidable and dangerous weapon of all time... cannot desist from warning and warning again: we cannot and should not slacken in our efforts to make the nations of the world and especially their governments aware of the unspeakable disaster they are certain to provoke unless they change their attitude towards each other and towards the task of shaping the future. We helped in creating this new weapon in order to prevent the enemies of mankind from achieving it ahead of us. Which, given the mentality of the Nazis, would have meant inconceivable destruction, and the enslavement of the rest of the world....

      - Albert Einstein

    3. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by lommer · · Score: 1

      This is a good question. I doubt that NASA, the ESA, or the Russian Space Prgram will immediately recieve more funding as a result of this. However, China has stated that they are aiming for a permanent moon base. Lyndon B. Johnson once said "I do not believe that this generation of Americans is willing to resign itself to going to bed each night by the light of a Communist moon." I doubt that this generation will be willing to stand for that either, yet the Chinese may achieve their goal before the Americans can get up enough of a head of steam to match it. Thus, I think that the goal of this space race will be a landing on mars. Whats more, I think that we will see this within the span of our lives, possibly even within the next 20 years.

    4. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      I disagree with your thoughts that this will be detrimental. The only way for humans to get into space is for the military to get involved. The technology that allowed columbus to cross the atlantic allowed spain to be the dominant sea power to 1588. The technology that propelled lindbergh across the atlantic was used in the planes of WWII. The technology in a saturn V was taken and used by the military in its ICBMs. If a technology has a potential military application, the military will use it for that application. On the flip side, there are many things that the military has funded, that wouldnt exist except for the military, that now have much more use for nonmilitary use than for military use. Hint: Youre using one now, ARPAnet was created by the US military. Frankly, if we send more people into space because the military needs to send people there, then more power too them. Because nonmilitary people will soon follow.

      --

    5. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's rather doubtful. In order to develop and test the technology to go to Mars could take a decade, optimistically. Building the spacecraft and launching the missions could take more than that, and that's assuming everything works. A U.S. program wouldn't tolerate a gung-ho attitude where we're slinging untested spacecraft to Mars just so we can say, "Hey, we planted the flag on Mars, and the Chinese only managed to take down the one on the Moon."

      Personally, I don't really see the value of going to Mars in the near term anyway. The Moon is a much more interesting science target, IMO, because we can launch many more missions (matter of days instead of years). This would vastly help us with learning to live in space, as compared to the ISS which is basically a bunch of rooms that happen to just be really far off the ground, but for almost all other purposes is pretty much tethered to the Earth's resources for sustenance.

      You'll notice the Chinese plan to launch a space station, then establish a Moon base. This probably means they're going to take the Skylab approach, rather than the ISS approach, since they want to get this all done in under 15 years. This probably means that the space station isn't the focus of their effort, unlike the U.S., which is quagmired in the project. It'll probably be nothing more than a test of systems they want to deploy on the Moon.

      Incidentally, I was wondering about all the Mars fanatics: why wouldn't it be a good idea to establish a Moon base on the Mars Direct model? After all, instead of launching an expensive multiyear mission to Mars, why not test the idea by launching a multiday mission to the Moon? While it's there, it can start digging the chambers for a manned habitation, and we could experiment with teleoperated construction equipment.

    6. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by heli0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "and... velcro ... trace their way back to the Space Race of the 1960s."

      Velcro was patented in 1955.
      The Invention of VELCRO (R) - George de Mestral


      "two taikonauts wondering whether to take down the American flag still found at the Sea of Tranquility"

      The SoT flag was placed too close to the lunar module and according to Buzz Aldrin was blasted over on their departure. The other 5 flags were placed farther away from the LM and are almost certainly still upright though.
      Group Wants to Protect Apollo Site

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    7. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by jnik · · Score: 1

      The technology in a saturn V was taken and used by the military in its ICBMs.
      Er, actually, it was the other way around. Redstone (one of the Mercury launch vehicles) and Titan (a Gemini launch vehicle) were originally ICBM's. The massive power of the Saturn V isn't necessary for getting a nuke around the globe--in fact, last I checked, the US isn't capable of producing them anymore (insufficient blueprints). Nor do we have anything with comparable lifting power. Better examples of solid military/nonmilitary cooperation are--well, borrowing the ICBM's as launch vehicles for one. Or the Clementine mission (which very nicely worked both ways--except the DoD payload failed). GPS. Lots of weather and space weather satellites benefit both.

    8. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Things both good and bad come from the space program. Numerous advances in materials technology have come out of NASA. Sure, it advances the military program, which means it leads to further military spending, and proliferation of arms - dangerous ones. But since at this point at least two and probably more like four distinct nations on this planet can ruin it almost entirely for all of us, I think at this point if it gets more dangerous... it's really not any more dangerous.

      We need to get motivated to get off this planet. I'd like to see the nations of the world send a group to Mars with membership based on the contributions made - the more you spend, the bigger the mission, and the more people you get to send. If you contribute lots of materials or whatever, that's the same thing as money right? Or, for that matter, equipment. We need to send a whole lot of stuff there to bootstrap any kind of sizable permanent base/settlement, so let's get to it. Of course it might be a long time before it bears any fruit but at least it's a step in the right direction. Let's all get together and do it right.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by miu · · Score: 1
      I congratulate the Chinese on their achievement,

      Why?

      Success with this sort of millitary technology by the current government of China is no reason to be happy. I can see little good about a dangerous nation like China developing spaceflight. The only bright side is that this may provide the impetus to get the US interested in space again.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    10. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can see little good about a dangerous nation like China developing spaceflight"

      (speaking from .au). I don't see China (*as it is at present*) invading nations on pretexts of non-existent weapons of mass destruction or stating how they're going to enforce their system of government and values on other nations. Chinese domestic policies are *much* nastier than the US, but internationally they're pussycats compared to the megalomaniac nutcases running the US at the moment.

    11. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Missing Saturn V blueprints is an urban myth. The real problem is setting up the supply chain to reproduce the design from scratch. And by the time you've put that amount of effort in, you'd have been better taking thirty years of improvements and starting from scratch.

    12. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by XiChimos · · Score: 1

      China, and Asia's, only downfall is that they want to be self-dependent. This is going to cause a premature golden-age and will almost definitely fail. Why fear weapons of mass destruction up in orbit anyways? They are just for show and tell, be scared about biological weapons since they are easier to make, maintain and deploy. Oh, did I say CHEAP.

      Good job China. At least someone is exploring.

    13. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't think the USA is a paragon of peace these days. But neither were they during the space race (Vietnam anyone?)

    14. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Velcro was invented by Vulcans who were trapped on Earth?

    15. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      All I can say is that if the Chinese have the initiative, that the US evidently has lost, that I'm willing to sign on with them if they'll let me join a space colony. If the US doesn't see this as a wake up call that you can't live in the glory of your past acheivements forever then I have no problem switching sides. I've been sick of the budget conscience apologistic excuse for a space program that we have for most of my life. Onward to where no (wo)man has gone before! :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    16. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Overall this may be the spark of a new space race.
      Let's hope not.

      Seriously, the *last* space race left the participants with entrenched bureaucracies that have spent the last few decades throttling exploration.
      Hopefully the initiative by China will evolve into an independent space station that goads India, Japan, the ESA, and USA to seriously pump funding back into their own programs and develop the spacefaring technology of 2001 by 2051.
      The problem isn't funding for technology, not by a large margin. The problem is funding for development of *existing* technology and start-up capital.

      The *last* space race was all about building technology rather than capability, (the two are not synonomous), and look where it left us.

    17. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Moofie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How cool would it be if the Chinese explorers put the American flag back up, and planted a Chinese flag next to it?

      Call me a jingoist, but I just get goosebumps from the symbolism. That would be an incredible, gallant gesture.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    18. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (speaking from .au). I don't see China (*as it is at present*) invading nations on pretexts of non-existent weapons of mass destruction

      I seem to remember that Australia was taking part in the invasion of Iraq.

    19. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think it is wise to divide the world into two categories - one of "dangerous" countries, and another of conquered countries. China is not dangerous at all; it is simply powerful. There are lots of other countries (Pakistan & India, Israel, North Korea, and don't forget USA itself) which are far more dangerous.

    20. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by vrmlguy · · Score: 1
      Your link to Group Wants to Protect Apollo Site reminds me of a bit in John Varley's SF novel, Steel Beach, where the narrator tells of a group of lunar frat boys who got drunk one night and went out and messed up the Sea of Tranquility landing site (driving over the footprints and tipping over the LEM). Fortunately, it was the most photographed tourist spots on the moon, so the restorationists got as many photos as they could lay their hands on and put things back exactly the way they were.

      BTW, (possible spoiler follows) this side story foreshadowed a major plot revelation, in that just about everyone knew that the site was, in a sense, fake, but no one ever talked about the "secret" in public.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    21. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Trinition · · Score: 1

      Of course, you could say that China is only a bit ahead of the X-Prize contestants who are nearing the same goal. And since the X-Prize even has American citizens in it, one could argue that the U.S. is still far more evolved in its space usage for the common man to be able to participate where in China it is still a national effort.

      (Obviously, this argument has holes, but it is an important facet)

    22. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with you that being "powerful" does not automatically mean "dangerous". However, history has shown that China, like the US, will tend to project its power when the opportunity presents itself. China is potntially extremely dangerous and I expect the next global conflict to be caused by a spat between the US and China.

    23. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question off course is. Was that rocket run by Free Sofware an GNU/Linux?

    24. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, their Government committed them, ignoring the mass protests and public opinion.

      What a "democracy".

    25. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by amightywind · · Score: 1
      If the US does not get off its duff soon, we may see a Chinese camera on the moon looking at two taikonauts wondering whether to take down the American flag still found at the Sea of Tranquility before we know it.

      "I, for one, don't want to go to sleep by the light of a communist moon." -- Lyndon Johnson, 1958

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
    26. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      When, exactly, has history shown that?

      The US has a very long history of projecting serious power far overseas whenever it feels it would serve its interests. I happen to believe that most of those times it was a just cause, and I have no problem with this policy, but that's how it is.

      China, on the other hand, has never sent troops into a country that isn't right next to it. They don't have the capability, nor, I think, the desire. If you have any counterexamples to this, I'd love to hear them, but until then I have to call BS on your assertion.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    27. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not the original poster, but

      They waged war in Vietnam, Tibet, Korea, The former Soviet Union, clashed with Taiwan over nearby islands and invaded India. While that's just local, the clash with the USSR nearly led to nuclear war. These were nasty little wars, and not the sign of a non-dangerous nation.

      Currently, the Chinese are engaged in disputes over the fairly distant Spratley chain of islands. They aren't too happy with the Japanese right now.

      They are colocated with India, Russia, Korea [South and North], Japan and Taiwan, and they do not get along well with any of them. India and Russia are nuclear armed, Japan is nuke capable. They are most dangerous, but the next war will likely not be US V China, probably China V. India.

      Chinese interests are somewhat local, and that seems alright until you realise just how many people live in that "somewhat local" region, and how heavily armed they are. They project power as far as they can reach, and if they could reach farther, they'd project power farther. History suggests this.

    28. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      I don't understand ... is the U.S. flag not there any more?

    29. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      As the parent poster noted, the Apollo 11 flag was blown down by the launch of the Lunar module.

      I was just waxing romantic. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    30. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      As the parent poster noted

      [Slaps forehead]! Thanks. :)
    31. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are seletively blind

    32. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Of course, you could say that China is only a bit ahead of the X-Prize contestants who are nearing the same goal. And since the X-Prize even has American citizens in it, one could argue that the U.S. is still far more evolved in its space usage for the common man to be able to participate where in China it is still a national effort.

      Not to diss the xpreize in any way, but sending a capsule 100km up is a lot different then sending a capsule 100km up and accelerating sideways to orbital velocity - before decelerating back to 0mph.

      Sub orbital (x-prize) is easier then orbital.

    33. Re:How will the world react in the long-term? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Theres a difference between democracy and mob rule

  52. Only 42 years behind.... by froggle2003 · · Score: 1

    One wonders why it took them so long.

    One wonders even more why Western European nations like Great Britain were beaten by the Chinese.

    One wonders why the Russians even beat us to the punch in the first place, when we supposedly got the better German rocket-engineers from WWII.

    ///

    Good Fig - News for Christians.

    http://www.goodfig.org

    1. Re:Only 42 years behind.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
      Better team is relative. The team the Soviets got had designed the Wasserfall radar guided surface to air missile IIRC.

      US's problem was they cheerfully duplicated WWII missiles without trying to develop new stuff. While the Russians, pushed by Stalin's megalomania, dumped loads of resources on missiles.

      Read all about early Russian rocket development here.

    2. Re:Only 42 years behind.... by SteveAstro · · Score: 1

      ...but it looks like they are accelerating the pace in space, since the front module of Shenzhou may be left in space as the core of their own space station. Knowing the mercantilist tradition of the Chinese, they may build the world's first space borne takeout on their first mission - it took the US 13 years after their first mission to build skylab, and the Russians more than 20, now on the Chinese' first mission they start to orbit station parts. These guys are aiming to go places fast.

      Steve

  53. Astronaut getting filtered content of world? by encebollado · · Score: 1

    I suppose the Chinese government installed filters on the windows of the spacecraft so that the astronaut (or whatever the Chinese translation) doesn't get a full view of the corrupt western world.

  54. Not Impressed by jhunsake · · Score: 1

    They used a (modified) Russian vehicle, and the astronauts were trained by Russia. About the only thing the Chinese did was provide the launchpad.

    1. Re:Not Impressed by tooth · · Score: 1
      Not completely true, read the article:

      Although the Shenzhou spacecraft is based on the Soyuz design, it is slightly more advanced and uses more modern computers to manage operations and navigation.

    2. Re:Not Impressed by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected, but I'm still not impressed.

      It's one thing to design something yourself, and quite another to take a complete design that already works and tweak it.

    3. Re:Not Impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And its one thing to send someone up into space and another to sit back in your easy chair and bitch about it on slashdot.

    4. Re:Not Impressed by subliminal_fugue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's one thing to design something yourself, and quite another to take a complete design that already works and tweak it.

      Like we oh-so-clever Yanks did with the WWII German designs and follow-ons by German engineers?

      Thought so.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    5. Re:Not Impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like we oh-so-clever Yanks did with the WWII German designs and follow-ons by German engineers?

      Yeah. The Saturn V is about as similar to a WWII design as an F-18 is to a Sopwith Camel.

      Nice try.

    6. Re:Not Impressed by ColaMan · · Score: 2

      It's one thing to design something yourself, and quite another to take a complete design that already works and tweak it.

      Like open source?

      Why reinvent the wheel on the first trip? Give them a little while to sort things out.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    7. Re:Not Impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had sex with your mom

    8. Re:Not Impressed by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Negative. This is a typical Chinese piece of work. Just like they rip off other people's electronics designs and remake them better and cheaper. Of course, they make a lot of crap too, but I'm betting their first spacecraft is going to be excellent. As usual they will have significant technology transfer, but they're definitely capable of innovation. It's just that for this step, there is no need for them to create anything truly new. This will give them a chance to test some design strategies, and some modules and parts. And it is of course possible that they are accomplishing some of this with newer technologies, though I kind of doubt it. The cheaper they keep it overall this time around, the greater the achievement, the greater the pride, and the more money they can whip up for the next stage. I'd guess they'll build some superior version of the shuttle, but it would be great to see them come from left field with something else.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Not Impressed by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      It's one thing to design something yourself, and quite another to take a complete design that already works and tweak it.

      Well at least give credit where credit is due. It would be absolutely silly to start a program, and NOT learn from the mistakes others have already made. They chose to follow the design concepts of a spaceship that works. They could have taken the other example available, but they chose the route of the one that works.

    10. Re:Not Impressed by Roger_Explosion · · Score: 0
      From Encyclopedia Astronautica -

      "The Shenzhou spacecraft appears similar to the Russian Soyuz, but is different in dimensions (slightly larger and heavier) and does not seem to use any detailed parts copied from the Soyuz or built under license. Therefore although it follows the classic layout of the Soyuz, adopts many of the same technical solutions, and the re-entry vehicle has the same shape, it cannot be considered strictly a 'copy'. And if one considers Shenzhou to be a copy of the Soyuz, then was the Soyuz design stolen - from the American General Electric Apollo spacecraft proposal?"

    11. Re:Not Impressed by ionpro · · Score: 1

      Well, excuse me, but it's a long way from a V2 rocket to a Mercury capsule. Yeah, the Germans (van Braun in particular) had lots of good *theory*, but obviously they never launched a man into space. The Russian Soyez capsule has been going to space for a long, long time, so we're in a bit of a different situation.

    12. Re:Not Impressed by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Umm, go look at all the names of the engineers that actually built that vaunted Mercury capsule.

      Their names sounded a lot more like "Von Braun" than yours does, I'll wager.

      The Chinese space ship is way better than YOUR space ship, so I don't think you have any room to judge.

      And that's "Soyuz", buster.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:Not Impressed by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's SO DAMN IMPRESSIVE to reinvent the wheel instead of actually being smart and noticing that there are already quite good wheels out there that just need a bit of tweaking.

      Oh, wait.

    14. Re:Not Impressed by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

      Well, excuse me, but it's a long way from a V2 rocket to a Mercury capsule.

      Is it really? In one way you're right - just as there is a long way from the engine of your car to the seat you sit in while you drive. On the other hand... the first american in space rode in a Mercury capsule on top of a Redstone missile - slighty modified to manrate it.

      I qoute from the website I linked to above: "Redstone was the first large liquid rocket developed in the US using German V-2 technology". In most respect, Redstone was naught but a A4 MkII - but mostly by the same people who built the A4 in the first place. In fact, those people, and the ideas behind the A4 and its derivatives, is behind almost every major american designed and built up to and including Saturn V.

      And as other people on the tread has said; it makes good sence to learn of what others has done before. The soyus is pretty much the optimum shape for a spacevehicle - combining good aerodynamics with hich volumetric efficency - so it makes perfect sence in using that as a startingpoint for an enlarged capsule. Or would you rather that the chinese went for the cramped 'spam in can' approach that the US Mercury programe was before they moved on to bigger and more efficiant designs?

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    15. Re:Not Impressed by nalfeshnee · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of the probably apocryphal story (but it's a good one anyway):

      "When NASA first started sending up astronauts, they quickly discovered that ballpoint pens would not work in zero gravity. To combat the problem, NASA scientists spent a decade and $12 Billion to develop a pen that writes in zero gravity, upside down, underwater, on almost any surface including glass and at temperatures ranging from below freezing to 300C...

      The Russians used a pencil.

      *G

      Nalfy

      --

      -- Despair is an operating system that ANY human being can run, sort of a psychological JAVA --

    16. Re:Not Impressed by dylan_- · · Score: 1
      I'm reminded of the probably apocryphal story
      Snopes has what really happened.
      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    17. Re:Not Impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is pretty funny. Von Braun DID build the Saturn V, so yes, he did send people to the moon.

      Ah, history. Who needs it? :)

    18. Re:Not Impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and the little silver cartons of reconstituted flied lice.

  55. But where were the parts made? by Gldm · · Score: 1

    I mean if American parts and Russian parts are all made in Taiwan, where are Chinese parts made?

    P.S. It's a movie reference for those of you who don't get it.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

    1. Re:But where were the parts made? by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Damn. Missed "made in China" too? Ok, I'm an idiot. This should be everything though, /.ers aren't that creative.

  56. When?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will they quit sending MONKIES into space?? When??

  57. The title I want to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First Slashdotter in Space

  58. Human spaceflight in the US by apsmith · · Score: 1
    First, congratulations to China, and best wishes to Yang Liwei for a safe landing!

    tuxlove writes:

    Perhaps this will kick the US space program back into gear?

    Maybe. While the shuttles are likely down for yet another year, coincidentally enough the House Science committee is meeting this Thursday to discuss The Future of Human Spaceflight. And, apparently at the request of the White House, the National Space Society has just realized a short position paper on next steps for human space exploration. NSS recommends a general revitalization beyond NASA, a focus on lowering the cost to get into space, planning beyond the space station for a base on the moon, and funding "planetary defense" against asteroids and comets.
    --

    Energy: time to change the picture.

  59. yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great.

    And considering the jingo nature of the shrub... it may give NASA a boost.

    It's always a good thing when a human being hops on top of a giant tube of hydrazine and goes head to head with Mr. Newtons law!

    Go China! (hope y'all can read this from Jiuquan)

  60. As if it matters either way... by michaeltoe · · Score: 1

    ...I'm sort of depressed. It's 10:30 now and CNN still hasn't gotten its act together. Neither has NBC or Fox. I walked around the halls of my dorm and they were noticibly inactive. Everyone is watching the Cubs game.

    1. Re:As if it matters either way... by c1ay · · Score: 1
      I'm sort of depressed. It's 10:30 now and CNN still hasn't gotten its act together.

      Yeah, you'd think the Clinton News Network would be all over this after the technology Clinton donated to make it possible.

      --

    2. Re:As if it matters either way... by guile*fr · · Score: 1

      I'm sort of depressed. It's 10:30 now and CNN still hasn't gotten its act together. Neither has NBC or Fox.
      forget CNN, NBC and Fox althogether, watch BBC.

    3. Re:As if it matters either way... by kcelery · · Score: 1

      The Hong Kong Stock Exchange is surprisingly inactive this morning.

    4. Re:As if it matters either way... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Holy shit, you need you're head kicked in.

      Maybe you will have to get your news from a real news network now that Rush is in re-hab, maybe you will be amazed what news is like when it's not from a person who admits he makes shit up.

      Only republicans can make connections that if a US company works with china is must be ilegal and it must be the presidents fault.

      CNN is all over things, just like they where all over gulf wars that were made possible by Bush and Regan in the 80's.

    5. Re:As if it matters either way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're dumb.

    6. Re:As if it matters either way... by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Judging from your spelling, you've already had "you're" head kicked in.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    7. Re:As if it matters either way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you need your you're yawed in.

    8. Re:As if it matters either way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... watch BBC

      Or better yet, don't watch the BBC. They have been exposed by Reason magazine as being communists, islamic fundamentalists and viciously anti-American. What's worse is that their broadcasts are filled with dangerous information you are better off never hearing about.

    9. Re:As if it matters either way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You kidding me? CNN wouldn't stop covering Clinton's scandal, and Clinton said he hated the press (I think he might have specifically said CNN) for zeroing in on that above all else.

    10. Re:As if it matters either way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BBC is islamic fundamentalist. That's pretty funny.

      More like they tell it how it is, and that isn't what you want to hear.

      What's worse is that their broadcasts are filled with dangerous information you are better off never hearing about.

      Like how the entire Iraq war was a sham?

    11. Re:As if it matters either way... by c1ay · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the case then I guess CNN made this article up about the waiver Clinton signed to transfer satellite technology to China. Of course there's been more documents declassified and reported on elsewhere but that's probably all made up too, huh? Then again, you probably think this is all part of that vast right wing conspiracy....

      --

    12. Re:As if it matters either way... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      read your cnn article. Clinton didn't donate anything. He signed a waver. If anyone gave anything it was Loral. If you are going to have beef with anyone let it be loral. As the article pointed out clinton was only continuing standing policies.

      If there was information give to china from loral that shouldn't have been, they should be the one you critisis. Besides, if it ensured less destructions of rockets and helped their program thats not a bad thing. Unless you want to see them fail over and over. Maybe right above your house.

      I never said nothing happened with clinton and information, but it was most definitly not the way you want to make it look.

    13. Re:As if it matters either way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quizo: CNN propaganda, give me a break. The only propaganda is coming from China's opressive government. Wake up dude. The whole launch was, as others have written, to enhance the Chinese government image. In fact, they cancelled live footage of the launch just in case something went wrong which would give a negative image of the government. What if it had blown up on lauch, do you think the Chinese governement would have allowed reporters to cover the story or would the government have downplayed the story and tried to cover it up.

      The examples go on forever, SARS, blocking Google, government crackdown on the internet. If you want to criticize any country about prapoganda, take a look at China first. Changing, slowly maybe, but still communist and a closed society, and still pumping out the BS.

  61. This is such a waste of money by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Funny

    A rocket? Capsule? Training? What a waste of money.

    Think about it. According to the CIA Factbook China has about 1,286,975,468 people. Figure the average person is 5' tall and you've got 1,218,726 miles worth of people. The moon at apogee is about 251,655 miles away, so they've got enough people to build a ladder to the moon with a nice stable base, even figuring in the inevitable attrition. Hell, take a look at the prototype. Just start passing up building supplies and poof! Instant colony!

    1. Re:This is such a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is beautiful. You've made a friend today.

    2. Re:This is such a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best post of the day.

    3. Re:This is such a waste of money by Basehart · · Score: 1

      This one should get a Score:10 Funny! Two sticks up!!

    4. Re:This is such a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same applies to the USA

    5. Re:This is such a waste of money by isorox · · Score: 1

      about 1,286,975,468 people

      About? What, 10 significant figures isn't accurate enough for you?

    6. Re:This is such a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, the chinese birthrate is such that they could march people into the sea 100 wide every second and never run out of people, essentially building a bridge across the pacific. (of course youd run out of topsoil as it was converted to food and then to people)

  62. Boohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk to me again when their people have a bit of freedom of speech, democracy, and aren't forced to kill babies. China shot a rocket into space carrying a human. I'm sure it was really difficult to copy the US and Russian programs from decades ago.

    1. Re:Boohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy god you're dumb.

    2. Re:Boohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, rather than try to refute things, you turn to insults. Bravo!

    3. Re:Boohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, he's right. you're an idiot.

    4. Re:Boohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America and China... Hmm, let's see. One of these countries enslaved an ethnic group purchased from another country and treated them like animals. One of these countries continues to send forces overseas killing women and children in the name of self-defense. One of these countries feels like spending almost 100 billion dollars on keeping troops uselessly around instead of investing in helping its own poor and answering fundamental questions of its existence. One of these countries is constantly stifling freedom of speech and religion for the sake of "national security." One of these nations took an entire ethnic group and put them in concentration camps, stripping them of all rights that are supposed to be "self evident"

      Before you shoot your mouth off about China, take a look at your own damn country.

    5. Re:Boohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said America was my country? And, would you rather live in America or China? Not a tough choice for me.

      One of these countries enslaved it's own people under communism. One of these countries continues to kill it's own infants. One of these countries stifles freedom of speech and religion because neither fits well with communism. One of these nations regularly kills religious and political dissidents, or simply imprisons them for life.

      If you really think China is better than America, then I suggest you move there. I'm sure you'll make a fine communist overlord.

  63. Re:FUCK YOU TIMOTHY by RIAAwakka_nakka_bakk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    FUCK YOU TOO NEGATIVE MODS! You infidel fools are simply bowing down before the crusading editors!!

  64. Space by Konster · · Score: 1

    This comes at a time when private American companies are gearing up their attempts at creating viable and cheap methods at putting men in space.

    Sure, it isn't orbit, but how far off could orbit be if Armadillo Aero and Rutan are successful at the stage they are at now?

    I know that it is a huge leap from going to where the X Prize competitors are going and orbit, but the point that I am trying to underline is that fact that we have privately funded companies making what looks to be viable attempts (except for the Rocket Guy hehe)at getting into space.

    I would be excited about this if they were using all home grown hardware, but as it stands it's just a remake of former U.S.S.R. accomplishments.

    This is no trivial feat to be sure, but it would have meant a lot more if they had done it say, 20 years ago using their own hardware and launch infrastructure.

    So, congratulations Russia on being the first country to put another country into space!

    1. Re:Space by merdark · · Score: 1

      This comes at a time when private American companies are gearing up their attempts at creating viable and cheap methods at putting men in space.

      Typical American myopia. Maybe another countries company will beat you into space? Eh? Didn't think of that? Figures.

      This is no trivial feat to be sure, but it would have meant a lot more if they had done it say, 20 years ago using their own hardware and launch infrastructure.

      Blah blah blah. Say it with me. Third country putting a person in space. *Third*.

      But hey, I don't mind following your logic. Let's see. German scientists got America into space in the beging. Go Germany!

      An the shuttle? Wasn't that designed by a lot of people that came from a company called Avro? And wasn't Avro Canadian? And didn't Avro build a better fighter jet than America? (although it was destroyed, no doubt in part due to American pressure)

    2. Re:Space by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Why is it that on slashdot lately, any mention of the America sends people in a blind, frothing-at-the-mouth rage?

    3. Re:Space by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      It may have something to do with US imperialist war raged by the neocons... Imperialism isn't new but the neocons are...

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    4. Re:Space by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      An the shuttle? Wasn't that designed by a lot of people that came from a company called Avro? And wasn't Avro Canadian? And didn't Avro build a better fighter jet than America?

      They may have stuck around for the shuttle program, but the Avro engineers that went south, went long before the shuttle was even a scribble on a napkin, they went to the mercury/gemini/apollo programs.

      Yes it's true, the Arrow was way ahead of it's time. Consider a mach 2 fly by wire fighter that could operate 2000 mile missions un-refueled, capable of operating in both fighter and bomber modes. Actually, come to think about it, look around, still not much flying today that can do that. But, doesn't matter, it's ancient history, and was scrapped for really stupid political reasons. So be it.

      The real interesting part is looking where the Avro engineers really went. McDonnel Douglas was 'first on scene' offering lucrative positions, but, the overall leader in early hiring turned out to be a fledgling government operation called NASA. They had a need for engineers to deal with supersonic and hypersonic aerodynamic problems on thier launch vehicles, Avro had engineers that had solved a lot of these already. Nasa was there offering lucrative salaries with relocation and 'instant citizenship' to bypass some of the red tape problems of having foreigners working on those projects. To aggressive young engineers that had just seen thier life work destroyed, the opportunity to go put a man on the moon was irresistable. For some more details, check this out here , an article on the reunion.

      While you are there, check out the Jetliner, and note, it was flying in the 40's already. Then look at the arrow facts. An example 'On its third flight, the aircraft was flown supersonically at Mach 1.1. On its seventh flight, it exceeded 1,000 mph while climbing. '. Approaching mach 2 in a climb at a time when american fighter companies could barely make thier machines go supersonic in a vertical dive.

      It's really interesting to look at the positions these engineers attained with Nasa, here's just a couple snaps from the above link, there's a bunch more there.

      Jim Chamberlin
      The former designer of the Arrow who went on to design the Gemini spacecraft and help NASA decide how to go to the Moon.
      Project Manager Mercury, Designer and Project Manager Gemini Technical Advisor and Troubleshooter for Bob Gilruth, MSC Director (Apollo). Shuttle concepts

      Owen Maynard Owen Maynard, the engineer from Sarnia, Ont., who quickly rose through the ranks to give life to the Apollo Lunar Module and later oversee the engineering effort on Apollo.
      NASA Space Task Force, Chief Engineering Designer of the Lunar Landing Module.

      Rod Rose The British engineer who helped plan the Apollo missions and picked out the first prayer to be broadcast from space.
      Rockets, Mission Operations assistant to Chris Kraft. Apollo and Shuttle mission planning

    5. Re:Space by merdark · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. But yes, it's because of America's miltary actions and other nasty things such as breaking international treaties (like the nuclear arms treaty).

      It's also because of the "We are supreme" attitude many Americans have here. The original post was crediting China's accomplishments to Russia because they used Russian technology and at the same time was cheering American corporate interest in space.

      Not only are such comments wrong (many other countries are also competeing for the X-prize), but they are also hypocritical (many American technological achievements are in fact due to others technology).

      Most of the American *people* I have met have been really nice of course. And it's pretty unfair to them to get blasted for being American. But I don't think the original poster was one of these nice Americans.

    6. Re:Space by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      I went back and reread the original poster and I don't think he was being arrogant about America. He was pointing out the very reasonable assertion, IMO, that China isn't really in uncharted territory here, whereas the US and the USSR were.

    7. Re:Space by merdark · · Score: 1

      That's true, but it's still no trivial task. Russia sold them some technology, but that technology still required much modification. And designing the launch and reentry logistics is no small task either.

      To credit the Russians with this accomplishment is belittling the Chinese. This is still a historic occasion, if only for the fact that even though "it's been done before" no nation up to now has done it. If it really was that easy, then surely a nation would have done this sooner.

      Why anyone would try to belittle the Chinese instead of congratulating them is beyond me.

  65. China Sends First Take-Out To Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when I was scanning the front page I swear it looked like it was saying they were sending chinese take out food to space... but then again Im really high..... :)

  66. Re:QUOTE.... by hitchhikerjim · · Score: 1

    In fact, yes... I think it was.

    It's sort of interesting... I do envision a new space race for prestige out of this. But it won't involve the US and Russia... it'll be between India, China and possibly a SE Asia alliance.

  67. No arms race? by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1

    I may be in the minority but I consider this bad news.

    Up until now the only countries with serious 'access' to space have been the US and Russia and, for all their faults, I don't fear those countries. In some ways I trust them, and in other ways I trust them to fear the other and the rest of the world. Either way, I think they'll behave themselves.

    China? I'm not so sure.

    This is just my opinion, of course, and I won't even attempt to back it up with any hard evidence because I know next-to-nothing on the subject. I'm simply talking as a citizen of the Earth who has a right to be concerned for the future of the planet and the species.

    What I will say, though, is this...

    Do you believe that China's interest in space is purely civilian?

    Well last week, a spokesman for the Chinese government was quoted as saying: "China has never and will never participate in an arms race of any form in outer space."

    Most people would assume that China intends to compete for military control of space, or at least to have a strong military presence. Most people would have accepted that. But if the Chinese government is already lying about its plans for space then I find that to be most worrying.

    Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/3180 618.stm

    1. Re:No arms race? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      What you are saying is a possibility but I HOPE no one militarizes space... Anyway, if you trusted the USSR, why wouldn't you trust China? USSR was far more ruthless than China...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    2. Re:No arms race? by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1

      The USSR would have fought a war if it thought it could win. China would fight a war over honour, real or perceived, win or lose.

    3. Re:No arms race? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Almost nobody trusted the USSR. Current Russia is even less trust worthy, if only because they are unstable in many ways, it wouldn't in theory take much for a crack pot to take over and start a war. However the goals of the USSR were to spread communism. Russia doesn't have those goals, and so a war started by Russia would not nessicarly be for the same reasons. So Even though Russia is more dangerious now, they are less of a threat.

      I expect China to get into an arms Race, but it will be with India and Pakastain. (The latter two will claim china is the emeny, while being at war with each other). I don't expect any of them to launch an attack, space based weapons are not yet ready for a real war.

    4. Re:No arms race? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty inaccurate view given that China hasn't really been an interventionist country for the last few hundread years. The only cases are Tibet and Taiwan. Other cases such as war with India are questionable.

      You may fear China more since you are American but to a neutral like me (Canadian :) ), interventionist countries (like USA) are far worse... Of course, China MAY choose a path of interventionism (once imperialists and various warmongers take hold) but let's hope not...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    5. Re:No arms race? by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1
      You may fear China more since you are American
      British actually :-)
    6. Re:No arms race? by dvk · · Score: 1

      > That's a pretty inaccurate view given that China hasn't really been an interventionist country for the last few hundread years.

      Eh? Tell that to all those Soviet soldiers who died fighting off chinese small-scale invasion on Amur couple of decades ago.

      I must say Russia has a LOT more to fear from China than USA if Chinese were pragmatic. However, if their culture takes over (i.e. eastern concept of "honor" and such taking over practicality), USA should be more worried about being attacked.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
  68. Well, that was quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    China's Space Launch Near; Malaysia Wants One, Too

    Posted by timothy on 2003.10.14 3:44
    from the or-that's-one-big-aspirin-factory dept.

    Enoch Root writes "According to an article on People's Daily Online, a Chinese news service, the first Chinese manned space launch is set to take place in the next few days, between October 15th and October 17th. Space.com has an interesting article on the subject, including a satellite snapshot of the Jiuquan, strongly suggesting the imminent launch." And alphaque writes "Malaysia is calling for interested applicants aged 21 and above to be its first cosmonaut aboard the International Space Station. The ability to speak Russian and prior space exploration experience is a definite plus, they say. Applications can be made online at your nearest astronaut recruitment site. Light sabres optional. Now the floodgates are open. Boldly go where no Malaysian has gone before -- to space, the final frontier." Offer is for Malaysians only, though.

  69. If he lands in the U.S., then what? by dolphin558 · · Score: 0

    What if, hypothetically, the Chinese craft accidentally lands in Central Park. Who would have jurisdiction over retrieving the man and where would he go? Would we suddenly see Chinese spies in NYC coming out of the woodwork watching how we handle the mistake whilst whispering in their two-way radio cufflinks?

  70. Watch Out Yer Spellin'... by robbyjo · · Score: 1

    I hate the term "taikonaut". You know what? Without proper pronunciation (as most westerners do), taiko can mean leper. (And thus becomes a pun). Better use "yuhangyuan" instead.

    --

    --
    Error 500: Internal sig error
    1. Re:Watch Out Yer Spellin'... by WEFUNK · · Score: 1

      Without proper pronunciation (as most westerners do), taiko can mean leper. (And thus becomes a pun). Better use "yuhangyuan" instead.

      Oh, that's much better. Because, as a westerner, I'm soooooo likely to pronounce "yuhangyuan" properly.

      Incidently, if "taiko" can sound like leper, what happens when I inevitably screw "yuhangyuan" up? Thanks.

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    2. Re:Watch Out Yer Spellin'... by robbyjo · · Score: 1

      At least mispelling of yuhangyuan won't mean much. It would be really funny when people say China send lepernauts to the sky! LOL!

      --

      --
      Error 500: Internal sig error
  71. What?! by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

    Great! As if little chicken bits from cosmonaut snacks hitting our shuttles in orbit wasn't enough! Now we'll have to clean lo mein off, too. ;P

    Welcome aboard China. ;)

  72. Joke already made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the first post.

  73. great... by tooth · · Score: 1

    The report quoted a Chinese naval captain, Shen Zhongchang, as writing: "The mastery of outer space will be a requisite for military victory, with outer space becoming the new commanding heights for combat."

  74. U.S. purchase of Chinese Capsule by harperbl · · Score: 1

    If the Chinese can provide a capsule that is as good as a Russian Capsule (plus other 'modern advances' mentioned at the end of the article) and do it at a reasonable cost, why shouldn't our Space Agency purchase these capsules from China? Designing and Building our own capsule would seem to be the natural thing for us to do, but in our capitalist econmony it might be cheaper to buy from China rather than putting all the time, effort, and money into recreating a piece of equipment that another Country has developed. Sure, the American companies that are vying for government contracts to provide our space agency with the capsule, but shouldn't we be putting funding elsewhere? Funding should go to researching and developing ways to get beyond the moon...to Mars and beyond even; not reinventing a way to get people into Earth Space.

    1. Re:U.S. purchase of Chinese Capsule by tftp · · Score: 1
      National pride won't allow that. Otherwise Soyuz capsules would be sold by dozens (cheap, compared to Shuttle, and would be only cheaper in volume.)

      Also, Soyuz capsules don't perfectly fit the requirements of the ISS (where most of the traffic is going to be.) NASA wants more people, and Soyuz can't house more than three without a major redesign (such as making it longer, which will affect aerobraking, so more formulas to crunch...)

      However, NASA's desires don't play well with realities either. Larger capsules require larger life support systems, and weight starts pulling you down. Soyuz has its size not just because some engineer threw a coin and it ended up on its edge :-)

      One of more realistic plans is to refurbish old american capsules and reuse them (or make more of those.) At least that is safe because it was tested, so it will work for sure. Anything else means risky development when you have no position to fall back (or even to stand while you are biulding the new stuff - shuttles are not flying anywhere any time soon.)

  75. This makes me kind of nervous by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    If the Chinese can launch a manned space vehicle into orbit, this means that they can drop an ICMB into the middle of downtown LA or NYC.

    What happens when and if in the future China's human rights record becomes so abysmal(not far from where it is now) that we revoke MFN trading status? Will they use this new tactical capability to "persuede" us to do more business with them?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the chances of trade status being revoked is slim, there is just way too much money to be made in a country where so many people will work for so little

    2. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by Shihar · · Score: 1

      China will never nuke the US. Nuke the US and you can be sure that only trade you will be getting is uranium imports compliments of our ICBM fleet. It is US policy to retaliate against any nuclear attack. Nuking the US and having your nation connected to the attack is a VERY BAD thing. China while oppressive is not irrational. Their government might rule with an iron fist, but it is at least a rational iron fist and the power is in many different hands.

    3. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      At a guess, no. Right now there's too much economic interdependency between the China and the West in general. Companies are setting up shop in China faster than McDonalds can serve fries. A military threat would cripple the Chinese economy and severely affect the West's, so things would have to be on the order of Cuban Missile Crisis bad before we need to worry about China dropping an ICBM onto western targets. And because the west and in particular the US is now dependent on Chinese goods or services, the US can't easily revoke China's MFN trading status any more than they can demand a regime change in Saudi Arabia. Both sides are held hostage in how far they can push for a military conflict, by the fact they help each other out economically a great deal. Note that the only substantial, state-level (e.g. not terrorist) threats against western interests are North Korea, which has no economic dependencies with us.

    4. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by pavera · · Score: 1

      I doubt we would ever try that,
      more likely is China will decide to stop trading with us. Give them 10 years to establish their economy and then we will be enslaved by them. They already own the panama canal, they could cripple us at any time they wished. Now that they can take over in space too, well its game over. Thanks clinton for letting them have out nuclear secrets, and all sorts of other secrets (as well as letting them get the panama canal from us..) With all of our tech jobs going over there, its only a matter of a couple years before they are light years ahead of us technologically, they probably already are getting close to us, and then its bye bye USA, they'll let us work for them for very cheap, and if we disagree they'll close the panama canal to our ships, nuke us, and it will all be over.

    5. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      No Offense but ARGH. How does paronia serve you or the US? America spends more on its military then the rest of the top 30 nations put together and what does it get from it? More fear? I'd recommend the Michael Moore documentary Bowling for Columbine, I know ur gonna pooh pooh it but just humour me and watch it through :). Now to be on topic, obviously this is an amazing achievement, yes if people like you hold sway then obviously very bad things can happen, like a space arms race. If you're arming yourself obviously everybody else will as well, to whatever capability they have, the race should be in science, medicine, health. America is the most powerful nation in the world and ironically the most hated :). Why not stop living in fear of others and make friends, help out the world. Just by cutting Agricultural subsidies and the US military budget america will have 2/3rds of a trillian dollars to make the world a better place. Its pretty much now or never. No Country / Empire remains dominant forever, why not try while we have that power to make the world a better place instead of being scared of it.

    6. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by pavera · · Score: 1

      It is because we are the most hated that I'm paranoid. Nothing we do will help, believe me the whole world hates and distrusts us and there is nothing we can do about it. I spent 2 years living and serving people in Venezuela, learned the language myself didn't ask anyone for money, lived off of savings I had accumulated prior to going. I just worked 14 hour days every day trying to make life better for them. The people there thought I was there as a spy, trying to find out more ways to put them in submission to the great USA. The whole world is so skeptical of us there is nothing we can do to fix it. If we try to be generous they think we have some ulterior motive, that through our giving we are just chaining them to some rock to keep them bound forever. The whole world sees us this way and I don't see any way out of it, using our 2/3 of a trillion will just make people distrust us more.

    7. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the rest of the world. The US can go it alone.

    8. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by tftp · · Score: 1
      What you say is true. Please say thanks to your government for all that wonderful job they are doing recently, in Yugoslavia, in Sudan, in Iraq, and elsewhere. That's why you get treated so badly, though -you- as a person do not deserve any of that.

      The problem is that americans as a collective organism deserve all that. Americans vote, americans agree to attack countries, americans support apartheid... so americans as a class get the beating, for they have the power to stop a bad government and they don't use it. It means they agree with the government. And in fact polls are right, most do agree (who don't know any better.)

      What to do about it? I hope the answer is obvious, and it begins with a well educated voter and well functioning democracy. None of that is in evidence at the moment, sadly, and none expected to show up next year.

    9. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by pavera · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that won't help. When America tries to sit back and let problems go by the wayside then everyone screams at us that we should be doing more to solve the problems, except then as soon as we do everyone resents us and hates us more. We are in a catch 22 and I don't see any way out.

    10. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by tftp · · Score: 1
      It's not as bad as you paint it. Every other country manages it just fine, why US can't? Is it cursed, or what?

      The longstanding US policy of interfering in everyone's else affairs is the worst offender. Cancel that, and most of the problems disappear. Pull the troops out of foreign locations, and the rest of the problems is gone. Stop being a world policeman (without anyone asking) and you will be safe. Stop teaching others how to live, and you will be respected. And nothing of that requires "doing more to solve the problems" - all the problems are of US's own making and reside primarily in Washington, DC.

    11. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by pavera · · Score: 1

      When things go wrong no one calls on France or Germany or the UK to try to fix the problem. Ever since WWI every time there is a major dispute/problem/war that we'd rather stay out of, the entire European continent keeps yelling at us that we're not doing our part, until we finally have to go in and solve the problem because no one else will.

      If it weren't for us "sticking our nose in other people's business" hell the entire European continent would be Communist, France, germany, italy, spain, UK none of that would exist, it would all be one big USSR.

      I don't feel that we are "world policemen" without anyone asking. Should we just get completely out of the Israel/Palestine dispute then (already tried that one, and the European community had a shit fit)? Move all our troops out of South Korea and just leave it for the North to conquer? Just sit back and let al queda drive some more planes into our buildings? Wait til Iran has nukes and let them drop them on us (because that is where they will drop them, not on pakistan or india or in Europe, but here in the US)?

      The problem with most of the world is that they can sit back and say "just reduce your forces and you'll be fine" because no one else is the target the way we are. France doesn't understand what it is to have people blindly hate them because of their religion. Germany doesn't either, they can all just sit on the sidelines and critize america because they don't have to worry about the consequences.

    12. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I suspect there's a strange cause/effect cycle that needs to be broken here and to a large extent it has to do with the US undermining the potential of the UN as a multi-lateral management forum. In the aftermath of WWII and during the Cold War days the UN has always, and still is, view by die US as a convenient way to rubberstamp its decisions and lend it a form of legitacy. This worked fine as long as the west in general agreed they were all fighting the evil east block.
      But as we've seen with the Iraq issue, when the west doesn't agree with the US, the US ends up quickly tossing its toys and going it alone and this is what gets people's hackles up...that the rest of the world is treated as only worth considering as far as it serves US purposes, and in many cases those purposes are 80-90% commercially/economically driven.
      Do a bit of reading on european history and you'll find that most countries in europe have been on the receiving, and in many cases on the giving too, side of blind hatred and imperialist overtures. So they've been there, done that, but they've decided to move on and actually celebrate their diversity instead of trying to squash it into some bland average european mish-mash.
      Not that europe is all angelic, but centuries of infighting and two world wars have taught them that conflict/war is not and cannot be a solution to problems. As painful as it might be and as long as it might take otherwise, problems cannot be solved by simply brandishing a big gun. All you manage to do in the end is forcing your opponent to go and look for a bigger gun yet.
      I suspect most of the world would be infinately happier with the US if it actually proved itself to be a team player. Years of abusing people, countries and territories to their own ends have let the world thoroughly distrustful of anything the US does and as with any case of broken trust, it can only be regained over a long period and with lots of hard work.
      So stop
      a) using africa as a profit centre
      b) dumping nuclear waste on others doorstep
      c) offering GM food that'll pollute the
      local seed and force them to have to buy
      new seed from the US every year
      d) exporting massive amount of weapons that
      are used to further inflame the world's
      conflict areas
      e) partake as an equal partner in the UN
      and actively work with concensus politics.
      That includes the International Criminal
      Court, signing the Kyoto protocol, etc
      f) allow other countries/territories the right
      to decide how they want to be governed.
      The US way of life/economy/government is
      not The One True Way(tm)

    13. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Why does the Al Qaeda exist? (CIA / Israel issue / Saudi troops :)) If America can unilaterally attack another country without any recent provocation (Iraq) if any at all. Then other governments have a reason to be afraid. Add in the fact that North Korea has Nukes and is being treated with Kid Gloves, even you'd see that Iran has no choice but to go nuclear. The solution to that particular problem is disarmament. Complete unconditional for all. America makes a big fuss over the Non Proliferation Treaty but that same treaty calls for all major powers to reduce and then eliminate their WMD. If America can't live by the treaty why should anyone else? About people hating America. Look up what the sanctions did to the Iraqi people and what it did to Saddam? Saddam was as powerful as ever while hundreds of thousands (millions?) of Iraqi's died due to malnutrition and medicine shortages. They blame America. Reverse the situ. America is denied vital medical supplies by Frances authorty to get rid of Bush, your 2 year old and 5 year old die. Regardless of your like/dislike for Bush , I can bet you'll hate the french a million times more. I dont have the stats with me right now, but the same video I recommended lists some of them, American interference in other countries and the resulting deaths. America invariably installs Dictators or false democracies to get people that are favourable to their policy. Read up on the Shah of Iran and the revolution. If america hadnt gone involved the revolution probably wouldnt have taken place to begin with. Egypt and its government. Cuba? Castro is evil? so fucking what? Cuba has advanced orders of magnitude under him, health care , the economy , everything. Seriously read up other sources besides Fox. I'd recommend the guardian (british paper) as one of the most unbiased source of news I've read. Here's to hoping people will see that war breeds war, hate breeds hate and well paranoia is a self fulfilling prophecy.

    14. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by pavera · · Score: 1

      Why does Al Qaeda exist? So we should have just left Kuwait in Saddam's hands then? That is why we were over there, which is why bin Laden got all in a tif. If you really think we should become isolationists again, fine I'm all for it. We'll pull all our troops and all of the jobs we create across the world, and it'll suck for us cause our economy will crash, but it will suck more for everyone else. The wars that will occur as soon as our protection is pulled from all the hot spots in the world will kill hundreds of millions (China will invade taiwan, North and South Korea will have at it, Pakistan and India will have a nuclear exchange, Israel will be destroyed, the balkan states will go right back to the bloodbath they were in before, Africa will descend into tribal warfare, south america will be overrun by drug lords). If cuba is such a great place to live how come we have millions of refugees fleeing that country and trying to get into ours? I agree that our attempts at installing democracies in other countries have been pitiful and stupid, I don't think we should be in that business, but trying to say we should play our cards like France is naive and stupid.

    15. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

      As an American, and someone with a good knowledge of history, let's take a look at two of your statements...

      First of all, I can think of 1 major regional dispute that the UK was called in to settle in the last 2 years. Sierra Leone had the potential to be another Somalia, but it wasn't.

      Second, if it wasn't for US, most of Europe would be communist, sure. But there were quite a few neutral countries (Sweden, Switzerland) that didn't participate in the war, at least officially. And some that weren't in any real danger of being conquered by Germany/Italy (UK).

      Interesting point about France... isn't France a Christian nation in the same way that the United States is a Christian nation? Wonder why they're not as hated... maybe because they're semi-rational about the whole religion thing?

    16. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by pleasetryanotherchoi · · Score: 1

      Point 1: Al Qaeda exists because the Islamists are intensely uncomfortable with the success of western style capitalism.

      Point 2: Iraq has been in violation of the treaties ending the 1991 Gulf War since those documents were signed. This is hardly a lack of provocation.

      Point 3: Since we have to treat NKorea with kid gloves, even you'd see that Iran must not be allowed to go nuclear.

      Point 4: Complete unconditional nuclear disarmament for all is a beautiful idea if you live in a fantasy land where everyone behaves and follows the rules. In reality, however, not everyone does that. Witness Iraq's, Iran's and North Korea's nascent or existent "secret" programs.

      Point 5: The US had their nuclear option thrust upon them by the chances of history and has used them exactly twice in the same war to defeat an enemy that simply would not surrender. We can debate the necessity of nuking Japan versus an all out land invasion in which tens or hundreds of thousands of women, children, and old men would have been killed rather than surrender, but more intelligent heads than you or I made that choice long ago. Again, fantasy versus reality.

      Point 6: The sanctions against Iraq, as well as ending the war before toppling that regime, were decisions made by the UN, not the US.

      Point 7: During the cold war, the US did indeed have to hold its collective nose and support asshats like Hussein and the Shah as the lesser of two evils. Or perhaps you would have prefered the Soviet Union to have a hammerlock on the mideast?

      Point 8: Castro is evil, so fucking what? I don't think that even merits comment. The US has tolerated the situation in Cuba for forty years, and no, Cuba has not improved by orders of magnitude, or any other measure. Witness the unending surge of people willing to brave ninety miles of shark-infested waters to get to Southern Florida before you declare how great it is over there.

      Point 9: I don't watch Fox News - I find they are too much a tool of the government to be trusted. However, I would recommend a little less Michael Moore, who has told at least as many well-documented lies as Bill Clinton. And I do read the Guardian.

      Point 10: Here's hoping people realize complacency breeds war, our successful society breeds hate among the losers of the civilization contest, and that it is not paranoia if you are attacked first.

    17. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by glebfrank · · Score: 1
      And some that weren't in any real danger of being conquered by Germany/Italy (UK).
      I suspect that you are underestimating the value of American help to UK during the Battle over Britain.
    18. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      No. And at least name the battle correctly, k?

      American help was very valuable, but the Battle *of* Britain was fought with Spitfires and Hurricanes, which at that point were produced entirely in the UK.

    19. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So we should have just left Kuwait in Saddam's hands then?

      Kuwait traditionally "belonged" (as much as any piece of the earth belongs to ephemeral humans) to the people occupying the area of iraq. Kuwait was set up by the British as an oil producing depot.

      If you really think we should become isolationists again, fine I'm all for it. We'll pull all our troops and all of the jobs we create across the world, and it'll suck for us cause our economy will crash, but it will suck more for everyone else.

      That's right there were no jobs, no economy, basically nothing happening until the US came along... The rest of your comment is in the same vain, nothing would be right without the US...

      How do you people believe this shit? And HOW THE HELL, can you not understand why everyone thinks you suck because of it?

    20. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by pavera · · Score: 1

      Ok, so the US is getting blamed for something the British did?
      How does that work?

    21. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by glebfrank · · Score: 1

      I meant material help (supplies.)

      Sorry about the name of the battle.

    22. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by pavera · · Score: 1

      We can believe it because we know that we saved the entire western world 2 times already in the last 100 years. If it weren't for us we'd all be under either Russian, German, or Japanese rule. Instead the US has stepped in at great cost to ourselves to provide the western world with its sovereignty. How the HELL can you be so ungrateful?

    23. Re:This makes me kind of nervous by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      Again, they received virtually no supplies that contributed to the battle.

  76. Clarke must be happy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember when you land on Eruopa in 2010, don't leave your spot lights on... it will attract the big green plant thing an you will be doomed. (=

    Seriously thou, gratz to China!

  77. x prize? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    Are nations eligible for the X prize?

    Seems like they'd have the resources if nothing else (Goooooo Carmack!)

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:x prize? by grozzie2 · · Score: 1

      Governments are specifically excluded.

  78. So that's why everyone spoke chinese in Firefly! by Tax+Boy · · Score: 1

    Good on them. Maybe some competition will increase NASA funding.

  79. Telemetry? by TrevorB · · Score: 1

    Anyone know where to get some real time telemetry on Shenzhou? Is it passing overhead tonight?

    1. Re:Telemetry? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      Given that it is completing an orbit every 90 minutes, it is passing over every meridian - several times tonight. Parallel-wise, I don't know where you are. Determining whether it's passing overhead is impossible given that.

    2. Re:Telemetry? by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      Most things in LEO orbit every 90 minutes. I recall seeing a site that showed where Hubble, ISS, and Mir were orbiting the earth...

      So, no, it's definately not hovering over one location, but it is trackable.

    3. Re:Telemetry? by caluml · · Score: 1

      http://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/predict.html might be of use. You can load extra keplars into it if I remember correctly.

  80. USA still has a great low-cost space program by sydlexic · · Score: 1

    As a result, China has become only the third nation on Earth capable of independently launching its citizens into orbit.

    I, for one, hit low earth orbit just about every time I witness the latest criminally inept shenanigans coming out of the White House.

    1. Re:USA still has a great low-cost space program by dvk · · Score: 1
      I, for one, hit low earth orbit just about every time I witness the latest criminally inept shenanigans coming out of the White House.

      Well, since the producer of such criminally inept shenanigans has been out of the White House since his second term ran out in 2000, the Chinese craft thankfully is in no danger of colliding with you.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
  81. Gooks in Space! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...hey, Mel Brooks, time for a new movie

  82. Amazing, just amazing by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Wow, the dream of manned exploration moves one step closer to reality. China has everything to gain with its ambitious space plans and seems to be the only government serious about building a permanent moonbase.

    This is cause for celebration. Its especially uplifting after the US has spent the last couple of years at war and the US's loss of its own spacefleet. Not to mention there are no ambitious projects anymore. Spacefaring has been distilled to the tight economics of launching commercial satellites and the scientific probes.

    This is a great day for humanity and I hope all goes well for the Chinese space team.

    I'm very much in awe. Is the technology old and the accoplishment something of the past? Sure. Is anyone else serious about spacefaring? No. China is quickly entering the 21st century through this, liberalizing its markets, and lately bowing down to protesters in Hong Kong. The future looks bright once again.

    1. Re:Amazing, just amazing by tftp · · Score: 1
      But isn't it curious - the only government capable of doing the right thing (to build the moon base) is not a democracy but an aristocracy...

      It only proves once more the observation of ancients: democracy dies as soon as the voters figure out that they can vote to give money to themselves... past that point it's all downhill. Such a "democracy" will never invest into a risky endeavor; it would rather spend its resources on something more close to the ground, something safer, something traditional...

      It takes a person with power and desire to use that power to take risks. The society is risk-averse, and there would be no flights to the Moon if the fate of the program would be voted on.

  83. Re:FUCK YOU TIMOTHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahha take it beiyatch

  84. Good for unsafe flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why send up a space chimp when you can use a chink?

  85. Remember - they actually have a plan by tqft · · Score: 1

    To all those who are a) jealous, b) pissed off, c) think they are a bunch of 60's wannabees

    Have a look at what they are saying - they have a forward plan. For exploration and exploitation of space resources - LEO, space station, then the moon, then beyond. Long term yes. But so was Von Braun's plan - the Saturn V was designed to put big loads into LEO and then launch lunar/whatever missions from there. It is still a good plan.

    Is this the first step - no. One of the articles (spaceref I think) says they cancelled their original manned space program in the 70's when they realized it was not going to work on their current boosters. And they have planning and building for years.

    By 2020 the cheapest way to get to space may be aboard China Spacelines, unless someone builds a space elevator first.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
  86. As if it matters either way... by michaeltoe · · Score: 1
    ...I'm sort of depressed. It's 10:30 now and CNN still hasn't gotten its act together. Neither has NBC or Fox. I walked around the halls of my dorm and they were noticibly inactive. Everyone is watching the Cubs game.

    On an unrelated note, someone fix the /. servers.

  87. someone has to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they can send one fucked up commie bastard into space, why can't they send them all?

  88. Anyone else notice the map? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    The map of China on the chinese news article clearly shows Taiwan as being part of China (which it is not).

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:Anyone else notice the map? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is if you're Chinese.

      It's not if you're Taiwanese.

      Chinese news article = Chinese = Taiwan part of China.

    2. Re:Anyone else notice the map? by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      China claims it is, so of course a map put out by them shows they own Taiwan.

      And in case you think it's a matter of an oppressive regime laying false claim to free lands, in Canada the province of Quebec puts out official maps marking Labrador (part of Newfoundland) as part of Quebec.

      Actually, come to think of it Quebec isn't far off from being an oppressive regime after all...

    3. Re:Anyone else notice the map? by praksys · · Score: 1

      China claims it is, so of course a map put out by them shows they own Taiwan.

      Officially the Taiwanese also regard Taiwan as part of China. Currently maps in Taiwan show mainland China as belonging to the Republic of China (i.e. Taiwan) rather than the People's Republic of China (Communist China). Perhaps this is the only case in history when a smaller, weaker, democratic nation has laid claim to owning a larger more powerful totalitarian state, and survived long enough to publish maps that record their audacity.

    4. Re:Anyone else notice the map? by hector76 · · Score: 0, Troll

      unfortunately, Taiwan has been part of China at least 1000 years ago. You can go to check history. How long has California been part of America? ALaska? Hawaii?
      The previous chinese regime escaped from mainland to Taiwan after its loss in the 1949 revolution. China is not about communism, capitalism, it is about 5000 years history. No matter what government it is in mainland, it is not affordable for China to lose Taiwan. One billion mainland Chinese will say no to the government.

    5. Re:Anyone else notice the map? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, for the longest time, Taiwan saw Mogolia as part of the Republic of China as well. See, while China, USSR (and later, the rest of the world) recognized Mogolia as an independent country to serve as a buffer zone between the two countries, Taiwan felt that they never agreed to it so their maps had Mogolia, Mainland China and Taiwan all being part of China.

  89. Re:And the liberal slashbots are ecstatic. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
    Huhuh. Please explain how using wasting more money on next-gen designs of the huge liquid fuel space rockets (LOX/LH2 designs are in the cards) helps with long-range nuke delivery. It may have when they first designed their toxic hypergolic rockets way back (the one which was launched today is close to their old hypergolic ICBM DF-5 BTW).

    They are putting all their new nukes on solids. e.g. DF-31 For nukes you need cold-launch capability and a LOX/LH2 space rocket requires a couple of minutes to fill the tanks and for the engines to heat-up. They are no good for nukes. Too slow.

  90. We need more Calgon! by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    Ancient Chinese Secret huh?

  91. Re:Translation (for Chinese people) by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    Oh, right, I forgot about badly done Japanese accent "jokes". Sorry. Should've seen it coming.

  92. eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they had launched the first man to Mars I would be impressed. But people have been going into space since the 1961. Whats really impressive is that its taken over 40 years for other nations to catch up with the US and Russia. I like how all the articles state 'China is showing their technological prowess'. This technology is over 40 years old. Now adays, private companies and individuals are on the verge of creating their own vehicles capable of getting them into space (X prize). The only thing that might start a space race again would be if Russia were to develop new technology that competes with ours, as they are the only other nation with enough experience to do so.

  93. RTFM by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Minutes after the launch, a CCTV announcer said that Shenzhou 5 and Yang had "entered orbit at 9:10." Xinhua said Yang was "reading a flight manual in the capsule of the Shenzhou-5 spacecraft and looked composed and at ease."

    I think I would have been prepared a little more in advance. I mean, what if some flunky forgot to include the last chapter -- "Re-entry and Landing" in the book?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:RTFM by tftp · · Score: 1

      There is no harm in going through checklists again and again, especially if your life depends on it, and if you have absolutely nothing else to do for nearest 20 hours :-) That flight manual is probably the only book he got up there.

  94. Did they only light the fires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading the article: The men they sent up were trained by Russia, the rocket is made by Russia, so pretty much all China has done has launched a rocket that others built. Right?

    1. Re:Did they only light the fires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in a word: no.

      re-read the article. the launch vehicle is chinese. the spacecraft is chinese (though based in part on the russian soyuz). the men visited russia during their training, but most of the training was in china. the flight operations are being directed from china. the landing will be in china.

      my hat's off to them. and to all the ass-hats poo-pooing this because they didn't immediately send a man to mars: get a fucking clue. you have to start somewhere.

  95. It's very strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when the nation's economy was bad, the nation's science was growing rapidly (e.g. A-bomb, H-bomb in 60s-70s last century); and now when this nation's economy is growing rapidly, but its science is nearly stagnant. although her taikonaut is sent to space now, its space tech. hangs behind USA's almost 30 yrs.

    1. Re:It's very strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because we arent heavily developing space technology doesnt mean the US science isnt growing rapidly. We are focusing in other areas, mainly in military applications. We have been going to space for over 40 years, and there just isn't much of a 'need' right now with everything else going on. we know more about space than our own ocean. I think money is better spent somewhere else for now.

    2. Re:It's very strange by zxm · · Score: 1

      But to almost people in China, the fact that the taikonaut is sent to space has nothing to do with them. they only need more job chances, more money.

      --
      -- forgive me my poor Engl...
  96. Waiting for slashdot.org... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    500 Internal Server Error

    An internal server error occurred. Please try again later.

    Did /. get farmed out to India or something?

  97. Re:Another Red Scare? by illuminata · · Score: 0

    Flamebait my ass, the word joke was bolded for a reason.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
  98. Re:Nice, but...Atomic Boom by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    But 40+ years is long enough that all the information and resources are probably available to country that has enough money to throw at it.

    That's the scary thing about atomic bombs. The only two atomic bombs ever actually used in war are basically 60 year old techology. Technology so old a modern EE might not even understand it.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  99. BAD, that's what this is by agent+dero · · Score: 1

    I hate to disagree with my fellow slashaddicts, but I see this as a terrible thing.

    China, being an oppressive communist country is NOT doing this for the good of the chinese people, they're doing it for the military benefits.

    While it's a nice technological achievement (spurred by secrets leaked during clinton's admin) It will not be prove to be something we'll like, we're talking China with Spy Satellites, GPS-like capabilities, and other military capabilities I am not allowed to talk of.

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
    1. Re:BAD, that's what this is by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      And swarms of small satellite mines that shadow Western spacecraft like annoying siblings ("I'm not touching you. I'm not touching you.") waiting to cripple our space forces should the Chicoms ever decide they want to collectivise Tiawan.

  100. PARENT IS A TROLL SHILL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay attention, people. Nothing to see here. Move along.

  101. There was tape, just not live. Streams are online by PenguinRadio · · Score: 1

    http://www.cctv.com has a bunch of streams of the launch and pre-flight interviews. http://www.cctv-4.com has live feeds of the mission.

    It was kind of sad that they didn't show it live, and it's probably the fear of a crash, but a lot of the "secrecy" surrounding the mission is a bunch of Western media hype. My mother-in-law, visiting from China, has been translating Chinese papers for me for the last week, giving me the name of the Astronaut days before the US papers, telling me the time of the launch 24 hours early, and several other things that our media says "is being withheld for state secret reasons."

    I'm no fan of the communists, but sometimes I wonder if the media we have covering that area even read the papers or speak the language.

  102. Remove the log in your own eye... by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 1

    ...before you remove the speck in your brothers eye.

    I'm all for the Chinese entering space, but like the Soviets before and after the Second World War and the reconstruction of Germany in the 30s these technological and engineering feats have been accomplished through social and political changes which lead to the deaths of millions and the destruction of cultural identities for millions more.

    I can't stand the hipocrisy any more. China is killing their citizens, but the G8 causing economical turmoil in many, many nations

    I grew up watching the damage the G8 nations trade policies do.

    I watched, over the years, a small country lose 10% of their GDP annually for several years, because the Clinton administration put pressured Europe to remove favorable trade relations with islands that earn a whooping $50MIL/year from all their endeavors. The companies represented, Dole, could have bought those entire countries 10s of times over.

    African farmers can not compete against against the heavily subsidized G8 farmers in the global market. These people are starving to death!!!

    I'm not going to defend China. But please don't come off all high and mighty because the damage that the G8 countries are doing is not making the headlines.

    Here's one article http://www.redpepper.org.uk/intarch/x-life-and-deb t-review.html on Jamaica's situation. There are lots of others in the same situation.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:Remove the log in your own eye... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The policies of the G8 do not lead to starvation in Africa. Africans die because of a lack of infrastructure.

      Life isn't far, the economic policies of the G8, the EU, NAFTA aren't far all the time to all the people.

      However the G8 and EU and NAFTA are not executing people who refuse to move from thier farms to a factory city. The G8 and EU and NAFTA are not machine-gunning protesters in thier respective capitals, nor are the G8 and EU and NAFTA causing 8 to 10 million to die a year by forcing collectivization.

      If I sounded high and mighty, I'm sorry, but I know that the successes and failures of the American Space Programs didn't come from slave labor, prisoning scientists who fail and aren't built on the bones of the millions who didn't die during the Dust Bowl of the 30s or the hard winters of the late 50s or 60s.

      The Soviet and Communist Chinese industrial and scientific successes are built on the bones of millions of dead.

    2. Re:Remove the log in your own eye... by magores · · Score: 1

      Just guessing here, but I think the grandparent post was trying to make reference to the massive subsidies that G8 countries give to their farmers and other "raw material" industries.

      Many Southern-Hemisphere countries do not have the infrastructure to turn their relatively abundant raw materials into processed goods. (Parent post does correctly point out the lack of infrastructure in these countries.)

      The question then becomes: If the G8 countries have the raw materials and the infrastructure to turn those goods into processed goods, why do they still subsidize their farmers to the extent they do?

      For an example of the level of subsidies provided by one of the G8 countries, you can view the Environmental Working Group Farm Subsidy Database. A summary for the US is located here: http://www.ewg.org/farm/region.php?fips=00000

      Interesting quote from the page mentioned above: "Nationwide, ten percent of the biggest (and often most profitable) subsidized crop producers collected 71 percent of all subsidies, averaging $34,800 in annual payments between 1995 and 2002. The bottom 80 percent of the recipients saw only $846 on average per year."

      ---
      Of course, I could be mistaken on what the grandparent post was trying to say. If this is the case, just ignore me. Or, ignore me anyway. I'm cool with that.

    3. Re:Remove the log in your own eye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your whole society is built on millions of dead Indians.

    4. Re:Remove the log in your own eye... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Not really, at least not in the way you're implying.

      The native Americans were here, but they weren't forced into labor to construct our skyscrapers.

      Also, many other countries and peoples were doing the same thing to indigenous populations within their reach at the same time the Americans were taking the land away from the native Americans.

      To try to claim some moral equivalence for what the USSR did in the 30's and China did in the 50's and 60's is ludicrous.

      Furthermore, two wrongs don't make a right.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    5. Re:Remove the log in your own eye... by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      The native Americans were here, but they weren't forced into labor to construct our skyscrapers.


      No. They were just exterminated wholesale, or driven off their land with huge death tolls (Trail of Tears ring any bells for you?).

      There's not much objective difference between the treatment of Native Americans by the US government and the treatment of, say, Ukranians by the USSR.

      And that's before considering the role of slavery in the US.

      Furthermore, two wrongs don't make a right


      True. So? We should pretend that the history of the US is squeaky clean because the history of "Communist" China and the USSR is full of appalling barbarity?
    6. Re:Remove the log in your own eye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S.'s treatment of the American aboriginal people was terrible. Luckily the U.S. was eventually able to overcome it's European roots and renounce genocide. The 150 years which followed the genocide against the aboriginies included hundreds of millions of dead in European blood letting. This has continued in Europe as recently as the last 10 years.

      We learned the lesson that genocide is bad 150 years ago. When will the Europeans learn it?

    7. Re:Remove the log in your own eye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's bring up slavery now, since all the U.S. haters bring it up eventually.

      The slave trade was run mostly by Arabs in Africa. There were many black slaves sent back to the Middle East, just as they were sent to the Americas.

      Now, what is the richest population of black Africans in the world today? What is the poorest? And what happened to all the black slaves who were shipped to the Middle East?

      What ideologies were involved in this outcome, and if you had to rank these ideologies in order of preference, what order would they be in?

    8. Re:Remove the log in your own eye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We learned the lesson that war is bad 50 years ago. When will the Americans learn it?

    9. Re:Remove the log in your own eye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      War is bad, but it is necessary. You must hate your life if you'd rather die than defend yourself.

    10. Re:Remove the log in your own eye... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      American Indian tribes in the United States were being driven off thier land long before the Europeans showed up, and while waves of disease to coincide with the settlement of the Americas, even the worst things the Americans did the the American Indians, like the Trail of Tears pale when compared to the sorts of things the Aztecs did to other tribes.

      http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/wars19c.htm
      4,0 00 out of 14,000 Cherokee die on route.

      http://www.straightdope.com/columns/021018.html
      4,000

      Even if there werw 4-6 million American Indians in the current United States and all of them died, which didn't happen, the US wouldn't even break into the top 10 death tolls of the 19th Century or the 20th.

  103. Quess whose prestige is going up? by survomies · · Score: 1

    I can hear the prestige of China going up fast. A distant hum from other side of the globe.

    A second space race would be a really good thing to have:

    1) Ignorant republicans will have to think about conquering faraway places like Mars instead of scheming invasions into helpless third world countries here on Earth. Maybe it's better to spend money on spacecraft rather than cruise missiles, don't you think?

    2) Perhaps this will result in a Trekkie fantasy future, with China taking the role of the Federation and USA playing faithfully the part of aggressively militaristic and uncivilized Klingons. ;)

  104. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    Hi, no one wants to go to Mars more than I do, but has anyone noticed that our (if you're in the U.S.) Dear Leader wants us to spend $87 billion on Iraq?

    Guess what: if there is a space race, I don't think we'll be involved. Whether we like it or not :(

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by Avatar889 · · Score: 1

      Even if we did blow that money, how much money does Russia have to put into it's space program? Do they still pay municpal workers in vodka?

      --
      Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementia (There is no great genius without a mixture of madness) - Aristotle
  105. Re:Indian Artical Insults Chinese Space Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This will backfire on the Times of India when India plans a space mission.

  106. public transport to space by venkats · · Score: 1

    i guess one reason why china wants to send more and more of its people to space is to reduce its population (greater than 1 billion) on earth;)

    1. Re:public transport to space by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Except that China is one of few nations that has it's population growth under control - in fact their population is expected to start dropping in a few decades. Even if the above wasn't a bad joke, China just doesn't really have a population problem anymore.

  107. Re:Indian Congratulates Chinese Launch by preetamrai · · Score: 1

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/article show?msid=229586 This is the link to the article. I must point out that this is not an official editorial. It is something like Slashdot where people come and debate. While there will always be people who will be jealous and try to undermine the chinese achievment, let me assure you that most of us are actually happy at the launch. It will positively influence the space industry in India. Hopefully there will be more funding and more seriousness. For a lot of us who are Arthur C Clark fan, there was never a doubt that China would be the third.

  108. how many uses are there for the extra modules? by johnjay · · Score: 1

    I noticed this in today's New York Time's article (2nd page) about China's preparations for space flight:

    The Chinese named their spacecraft Shenzhou or Divine Vessel. Weighing more than 8 tons and almost 30 feet long, it was slightly larger and heavier than the Soyuz. The main difference is the forward unit, which on the Shenzhou has solar panels and can remain in orbit after the piloted module descends back to Earth.

    How many uses are there for these modules, these little electric generators in space? I assume that they are not just scientific/military satellites that are attached to the manned launch. (I may be incorrectly estimating the size of a military satellite). They sound like building blocks that are being left in orbit for future use. What would they be used for? They probably wouldn't be able to change their orbit/trajectory very much, because they probably have little or no fuel.

    If that is true, then they are just orbitting electrical generators. I suppose that would be useful for two things (essentially the same). A) they could provide power for satellites, so the satellites themselves could be launched with more instruments. B) they could provide power for space stations, so (again) the volume of future launches could be devoted to habitation rather than power.

    I don't know. Are there other possibilities?

    Also, I'm going to wait on congratulating China until the taikonaut survives the trip. So far it is still just a worthy attempt.

  109. Re:Nice Troll, but... by ymgve · · Score: 1

    Right now, people aren't really of much use in space (apart from bragging value) so most space-faring nations have instead used their cash to get useful stuff, like sattelites, out there instead.

  110. Mostly Chinese by deaddeng · · Score: 1

    From what I've read, the most importance Russian assistance was crew training. The capsul appears based on Soyuz, but was extensively modified and made in China. The LM-2F is based on the DF-5 ICBM with strapon solids (similar to Titan). The pictures I've seen of the Jiuquan launch complex show it is huge-- if you see a picture, look at the flame buckets at the main pad used for this launch--they are massive, comparable to what we used for Apollo and what the Soviets used for Energa. It looks like the Shenzhou-V was stacked in an assembly building, and then slow-tracked to the launch gantry, like the US did with Apollo. This is no threadbare space program, and the appear to have built for a very ambitious effort.

    --
    --- .085 as cool; proving that a little knowledge is dangerous
  111. Uh-oh by nihilogos · · Score: 1

    Aparrantly some Chinese naval captain called Shen Zhongchang commented "The mastery of outer space will be a requisite for military victory, with outer space becoming the new commanding heights for combat."

    What military victory does he have in mind exactly? I wish more corporations were interested in outer space. At least they're only after money.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:Uh-oh by tftp · · Score: 1

      What did you expect from a military guy? You'd get the same answer from any soldier, in any country. That's their job.

  112. Re:GO CHINA! x1488 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it won't. Americans are way ahead of any of the other would-be competitors in space technology and experience. Furthermore, space races are only useful when there's a purpose--like, to control the moon, mars, or satellite-space.

  113. Re:There was tape, just not live. Streams are onli by andih8u · · Score: 1

    Depends, you ever met someone who was a journalism major who was ultra bright?

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
  114. US Space Program by rscrawford · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this will kick the US space program back into gear?

    I doubt it. A space program would require a high degree of vision and high-level leadership which our country is not currently capable of.

    --
    -- The reason it's called the right wing? Irony.
    1. Re:US Space Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I doubt it. A space program would require a high degree of vision and high-level leadership which our country is not currently capable of.


      But wait, what about George Dubya? He said yesterday "I'm in charge!"
      Well you just keep repeating it, chimpy!
  115. Long March? by CracktownHts · · Score: 1
    What kind of message are you sending your astronauts by launching them into space on rockets named after an event in which 90,000 people died?

    All joking aside, however, this should be interesting. In other news, I read in NYTimes today that Shanghai should soon have a building taller than the Petronas Towers (in other words, they'll soon have the tallest building in the world). With the WTC gone and NASA in a pathetic state, it looks like the US has lost its monopoly on highly recognizable symbols of prosperity.

    1. Re:Long March? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I'm going to get flamed for this (maybe) but I'll say it anyway...

      USA still has something no other country does. This building is not as tall as others; it isn't a symbol of prosperity; it doesn't generate much money; but it is more important. I'm talking about, none other than, the Statue of Liberty.... When USA ships the Statue of Liberty backs to France claiming it is undesirable, then'll it'll really lose its monopoly. At that rate that USA is going, it just might happen :(

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    2. Re:Long March? by vidarh · · Score: 1
      That perseverance will pay off?

      Regardless of what you think about the Chinese government and the Red Army, the Long March was an incredible accomplishment that essentially saved the CCP from destruction and gave them an opportunity to regroup that ultimately gave them their victory.

      Consider that the CCP went from being around a dozen people (literally, I believe it was 11 or 13) when it was founded in 1921 to governing China in just 28 years despite a civil war which more than once nearly decimated them, and Japanese invasion, and compare it to the military achievements of similar rebel movements.

      The Long March still has more or less myth-like qualities for many people.

    3. Re:Long March? by tftp · · Score: 1

      FYI: There is no Statue of Liberty in Canada. But there is liberty. These two facts are orthogonal.

    4. Re:Long March? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      USA has more freedoms than Canada. For instance, USA grants "full" freedom of speech, whereas Canada does not.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  116. YES!!!! YAY FOR HUMANITY! by subliminal_fugue · · Score: 1
    I was gonna post this exact same comment, but I'm glad to reply to a like-minded soul. This is a HUGE achievement, and my best wishes go out to the brave souls who rode that modified ICBM into the orbital great beyond, just like Yuri Gagarin and John Glenn did 40+ years ago.

    This brings to mind a pilgrimage I made to Cape Canaveral last spring (from San Diego, on a motorcycle ... it's a big country, folks). From my trip log:

    Well, today was the big day. I got moving kind of late and didn't arrive at Kennedy Space Center until 11:30AM.

    I splurged on the maximum access admission package with all the trimmings and walked on in ... to Disney Space Center.

    Don't get me wrong -- there were a lot of unique and cool things to see -- but everything was waaaay too slick and well merchandised for my taste. The "Space Store" was the worst offender, stuffed with every cheesy space-related gewgaw and gimcrack you can think of, just like Disneyland.

    Many of the exhibits were models or poorly-executed mockups, and the video presentations were jingoistic joint productions of Nickolodean and the WWII War Deparment's propaganda writers. Rah, rah, rah -- we beat those dirty Russkies to the Moon.

    One mockup *was* cool, though. They had a reconstruction of Robert Goddard's (the father of modern rocketry) first liquid fueled rocket. It was interesting to see how big it really was, or rather wasn't. I did a report about Goddard and that rocket in the fifth or sixth grade, so it's one of my favorites.

    I took in an Imax feaure on the International Space Station (the other movie was one we own on DVD ... Yeah, I'm a space geek). It was a 3D movie which used polarized glasses (not the red & blue kind) that preserved color fidelity and worked amazingly well on the stuff filmed with a stereoscopic camera.

    Afterwards came a 1.5 hour bus tour to the Assembly Building, Launch Complex 39, and some other cool places. Even though it rained like hell, we were forbidden to leave the bus because of intense lightning activity, and the tour narrator's inaccurate or inane comments and responses. Example: a fellow tourist asked who had the most accumulated timein space. She took a tolerably poor guess (Story Musgrave, though he might have gone up more *often* than anyone else). I softly suggested that it was probably one of the Russians who got stuck on Mir when the Soviet Union collapsed, to which she responded "Oh, we're talking about Americans".

    Nonetheless, I greatly enjoyed seeing everything once I tuned her out. For a geek like me, LC39 is like Mecca to Space City, Kazakhstan's Medina. At least one of the exhibits credited Korolev's huge role in space exploration, even though he was a damnable commie.

    The sales pitch to taxpayers was laid on pretty thick in the form of signs scattered around the grounds touting spin-off technologies and in a fair amount of tour guide & video presentation verbiage. The rest of the pitch consisted of jingoism hat ignored key contributions played by undesireables like that old Nazi Werner von Braun in Alabama. It's really too bad they took this approach since spaceflight is something that should ignore such divisions and should rise above cheap stars'n'stripes'n'pom-poms.

    I'm glad I went, though I must say that I had more "wow" moments at White Sands than at the Disney Space Center.

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
    1. Re:YES!!!! YAY FOR HUMANITY! by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      I was gonna post this exact same comment

      HA! And you think you can recover that "stolen" karma just by rephrasing and elaborating on his post?

      You must be n... er.. an experienced slashdotter.

    2. Re:YES!!!! YAY FOR HUMANITY! by subliminal_fugue · · Score: 1

      HA! And you think you can recover that "stolen" karma just by rephrasing and elaborating on his post?

      No ... I'm over (WELL over) 16 years old, and I get laid on a regular basis. Karma isn't really high on my list of priorities. :-P

      You must be n... er.. an experienced slashdotter.

      Actually, I'm still kind of annoyed that they had to introduce moderation. I liked it better before.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    3. Re:YES!!!! YAY FOR HUMANITY! by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      ...I get laid on a regular basis. Karma isn't really high on my list of priorities.

      I'm a little confused... once "Job 1" is taken care of, what priorities could there possibly be?

    4. Re:YES!!!! YAY FOR HUMANITY! by subliminal_fugue · · Score: 1

      I'm a little confused... once "Job 1" is taken care of, what priorities could there possibly be?

      From what I've heard, I have just a few years left before the answer to your question is "golf".

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
  117. Linux and spaceships by poppycock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Despite recent advances in economic freedoms, China is still a dangerous totalitarian regime. In the west, we rail against the abuses of the State, and rightly so, but the abuses of the west are nothing compared to China.



    http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/china0803/2.htm#_T oc49242552

    http://www.derechos.org/human-rights/nasia/china/

    http://www.tibet.ca/wtnarchive/1997/1/30_7.html

    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB16/

    To say "Go China" is to deny the real and substantial differences between liberal democracies and repressive regimes. I can say that W is a dummy with impunity in the US. Chinese citizens can't do likewise. These freedoms make forums like slashdot possible, and are directly responsible for the wealth and privilege that I and many many others in western democracies enjoy.

    I hope that China will join the community of nations that protects the rights of the individual. Maybe the power they now have will help them, and the rest of us, fulfill the promise of the American Declaration of Independence. In the meantime, don't make the deadly and dangerous mistake of confusing interesting technology with "good." Linux and spaceships can be used for good and evil.

    1. Re:Linux and spaceships by subliminal_fugue · · Score: 1

      Linux and spaceships can be used for good and evil.

      I appreciate the sentiment, but one can cheer the achievement while condemning the sponsors.

      The Chinese are well aware that a lot of governments around the world realize that an astronaut could easily be replaced by a nuke. That doesn't make the man in the spacecraft any less brave or the engineers any less triumphant.

      Today is the time to celebrate. There are plenty of tomorrows for worry.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    2. Re:Linux and spaceships by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      *shrug* Next time you are in germany strike up a conversation with some of the locals about how much the Nazis improved our knowledge of chemistry and furnace design.

      --
      stuff
    3. Re:Linux and spaceships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True... But I would think that the direction they're going in is at least as important as where they're currently standing.

      China is like a guy who started out with a net worth of $10 twenty years ago, is currently worth $10 million, and still going up. The U.S., on the other hand, is like a guy who was worth $1 billion twenty years ago, but squandered away half of it and is only worth $500 million now. Sure, we're doing 50 times better than China, but it's all inheritance. They're slowly but surely improving their human rights situation, while we're taking away freedom left and right. Which is more evil? Arresting you because you bad-mouthed the government, or arresting you because you're of middle-eastern descent?

    4. Re:Linux and spaceships by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      Ouch, so true.

      = 9J =

    5. Re:Linux and spaceships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complete red herring.

      In launching Shenzhou are the Chinese doing anything on a par with burning Jews?

    6. Re:Linux and spaceships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The important part that the parent was replying to was I appreciate the sentiment, but one can cheer the achievement while condemning the sponsors.

    7. Re:Linux and spaceships by tloh · · Score: 1

      I can say that W is a dummy with impunity in the US.

      I'm sure many other sensible Americans have done the same thing. So much good that has done. Parent poster does not realize that free speech is in reality kind of toothless in most situations - even in democracies.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    8. Re:Linux and spaceships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a population of over 1 billion, 250 million of whom are middle class (For dumbasses that don't know the US only has a pop. of 250 million) I think a democracy would be a highly inneficient form of government. Especially with the massive infrastructure programs that China is undertaking right now such as the Three Gorges Dam. For example under a democratic government do you think 1.3 million people could be relocated in order to flood their towns? The US had the opportunity to do these kinds massive projects using slave labour and migrant workers before civil rights were considered.

    9. Re:Linux and spaceships by eyeye · · Score: 1

      So....
      I don't get your point. Because they are Evil(tm) we should pretend their space programme sucks?

      The current US regime sucks but I rather like slashdot and am not afraid to say... Go Slashdot!

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  118. Re:And the liberal slashbots are ecstatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It certainly didn't take long for the idiotarian slashbots to suggest that China will be nuking the US tomorrow. Perhaps you would feel better if we pre-emptively nuked them first? Fucking moron.

  119. Congrats by WasteOfAmmo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Instead of the usual attempt at humor (which usually fails miserably) this /. reader has one thing to say...

    *Way to go China*

    Kudos to all of the people involved.

    Heres hoping for a safe and uneventful journey.

    Merlin.

    1. Re:Congrats by XNormal · · Score: 1

      Heres hoping for a safe and uneventful journey.

      "May you travel in interesting vehicles".

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  120. NOT Clinton News Network. It's Contain No News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jeez

  121. Re:Indian Artical Insults Chinese Space Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/xml/unc omp/articleshow?msid=229586

    Very amusing article indeed. Is it just me or do this writer sound so desperately jealous? :-) I thought Indians and Chinese are supposed to be like brothers? Let us have peace...

    ...Secondly, and more importantly, in spite of the battering India's democratic image gets from time to time, dissent in the country is still allowed and indeed flourishes.

    Not so in China...

  122. Godspeed, Yang Liwei! by csoto · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the spacefaring nations, China! There's plenty of room.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  123. Could the money have been better spent? by EnlightenedDuck · · Score: 1

    Just to ponder - how else could China have spent that money for the benefits of its citizenry - how many kids could have been sent to college, how much could healthcare of been extended to rural areas without, etc., for the money invested in sending somebody to space? And what has this accomplished other than stroke some egos?

    --
    Quack!Quack!.....QUACK!!
    1. Re:Could the money have been better spent? by silex_reloaded · · Score: 0

      well, just like the US could have spend the money and lives elsewhere better than Iraq. You're saying "if a person's math is not good enough, he/she shouldn't be playing soccer." That doesn't make sense to me.

    2. Re:Could the money have been better spent? by ryen · · Score: 0

      so just because the US wastes money then its OK for every other country to waste money? China needs to wake up and feed its own people before doing their half-assed redundant space exploration.

    3. Re:Could the money have been better spent? by EnlightenedDuck · · Score: 1
      Well, I'd argue against US actions in Iraq based largely on the cost.....but to take this argument, the money (and lives) spent in Iraq freed a country from a murderous dictator. Polls from Iraq are showing a majority of Iraqis think that the US invasion is a net benefit (I'll admit right now I don't trust the polls - I don't think all Iraqis are that easy to get ahold of to do a good poll).

      Keeping out the caveats I've been placing to be balanced and objective - the expenditures in Iraq liberated a people (assuming the US turns over governance, which it looks like it will) who were being totally screwed (by Hussein, and to an arguable extent the US and the UN). That is accomplishing something. Sending somebody into orbit isn't.

      And find me some good science done in orbit. I'll point out the payload of Columbia (seeing how roses bloom in 0g....5th graders science project!) and Feynman's observation that he hadn't seen a paper from the shuttle program to point out manned spaceflight is more about prestige and ego than it is about science. Given the poverty of rural China, I'm quite sure the money can be better spent.

      And no, if a person's math is horrible, there is no reason they shouldn't be playing soccer. They aren't playing with other people's time (money). And if they don't enjoy the math, or at least see a reason for doing it, they'll be spending their time better playing soccer, since the math will be useless to them.

      --
      Quack!Quack!.....QUACK!!
    4. Re:Could the money have been better spent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China spent $2 billion on its space program. That puts a lot of kids into college, yeah.

      The US spent $15 billion on its space program and $85 billion on Iraq.
      For each student China could have sent to college, we could have sent 50.

      Don't presume to preach how China should spend its money. Our own house is shit.

    5. Re:Could the money have been better spent? by tftp · · Score: 1
      "Boldly go where no man has gone before" - does it ring any bell?

      Or maybe you think that Starfleet will be magically formed by millions of chinese ballet dancers who got the money after the space program got canceled?

      If you don't take risks you stagnate. I refer you to ST:{TOS,TNG,...} - replace all instances of risk taking with, say, hightailing, and try to imagine how different the stories will be!

    6. Re:Could the money have been better spent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Polls from Iraq are showing a majority of Iraqis think that the US invasion is a net benefit


      I don't know what polls you've been reading buddy, but let me assure you, those open arms they've been welcoming us with, are of the RPG variety.

      And of course, don't forget this:
      US Army's fake letters cause stir
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/31909 34.stm
    7. Re:Could the money have been better spent? by silex_reloaded · · Score: 0

      Given the fact that there are so many poor minorities and workers in US and so many black children cannot get good education they deserve. I'm sure the money could have been better spent than in Iraq. (You see Iraq people welcome US army, but remember it's on the US TV program. In Asia TV programs, that was another story.) Even building another space shuttle would be much better.

    8. Re:Could the money have been better spent? by EnlightenedDuck · · Score: 1
      For a good discussion on the "fake" letters see: this page from instapundit. The polls come from Gallup. If you look at US casualty figures, I wouldn't say the open arms are RPGs - also note almost all of the casualties come from the Sunni triangle. Most of the reports from the troops, congressional observers, odd musicians traveling in the area, etc. are quite positive. Electrical power generation is up over pre-war levels, numerous hospitals and schools are being opened, non-expired medicine is available (and no, it wasn't the sanctions before), etc.

      Also of note is that the Iraqi governing council is (occasionally) standing up to the US, e.g. with the issue of Turkish troops coming.

      --
      Quack!Quack!.....QUACK!!
  124. LOL good one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    send the niggers up there too. Leave earth for Whites.

  125. And best wishes for a safe return by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 1

    They've still got a little work to do today but hopefully their boy will have a gentle touchdown. That of course will be a BIG TOUCHDOWN for China :)

    Good work boys, best wishes for your future success.

    Let's hope this is the swift kick in the ass that NASA badly needs.

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
    1. Re:And best wishes for a safe return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're drawing up plans to outsource all astronaught jobs to China as we speak. Have a little paitence, these types of delicate negotiations take time.

    2. Re:And best wishes for a safe return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully this will trigger a good old-fashioned space race. Just what we need when we want someone on Mars. I don't care what race, nation or whatever, just that it happens before 2050-something.

      We need to put more investment in science and space than in weapons to kill ""terrorists"".

    3. Re:And best wishes for a safe return by turgid · · Score: 1
      Let's hope this is the swift kick in the ass that NASA badly needs.

      Hopefully, it will stimulate something. I'm not sure it's NASA that needs the kick in the behind, but the politicians who run the USA. They are so lacking in imagination and forward thought.

  126. How long until Hollywood comes out with ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capricorn Two, or
    Capricorn One, The Sequel! or
    Capricorn Reloaded
    . . .

    <smack-upside-the-head/>

  127. Three nations, soon to be two, perhaps even one by Alomex · · Score: 1

    With the rapid decline of infrastructure in Russia, perhaps not long from now they will stop being able to send humans into outerspace. On our side, with the failures of the shuttles and the deep budget cuts of Bush, things do not look much better.

    Perhaps in ten to fifteen years, China will be the only country sending humans into orbit.

    1. Re:Three nations, soon to be two, perhaps even one by tftp · · Score: 1
      The decline actually stopped years ago, it's just the news haven't reached CNN yet. Putin is smart, unlike Yeltsin, and he knows his job.

      With regard to space exploration, nobody knows what will happen in 10 years, but just few days ago Russia announced that it is capable and willing to support and maintain the ISS for as long as it takes, many years if need be. Given that Salyut and Mir stations were manned since 1975, there is little doubt in this promise. Currently we expect Shuttles to fly in one year, but who knows what the engineers will find once they open them up for the mandatory inspection...

    2. Re:Three nations, soon to be two, perhaps even one by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Currently we expect Shuttles to fly in one year,

      I actually think this is a bad thing. The best thing that can happen to the US space program is to develop a modern, more reliable alternative that is trying to be a "shuttle" to space, which never really was.

    3. Re:Three nations, soon to be two, perhaps even one by ViolentGreen · · Score: 0

      Oh, I think Putin is very smart. He seems to be keeping the old soviet allies (i.e. North Korea) while at the same time, strengthing ties with the west.

      While I don't believe that relations with N.Korea and Iran are a great thing in theirself, Russia's ties with these countries along with the western world has secured it's place in the role of world security for the forseeable future.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  128. No, it's called irony by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    and the Americans don't get irony. Everybody knows that.

    Spoiler

    Despite the evidence such as TV shows like Becker and Seinfeld.

  129. perhaps, but... by Davorama · · Score: 1
    Perhaps this will kick the US space program back into gear?

    Perhaps, but it'll only be affordable if we outsource the engineering to India and the manufacturing to Taiwan.

    --

    Davo -- Free speech, free software, AND free beer.

  130. Re:Another Red Scare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mods, please moderate the above dissident's post down for arguing about moderation policies.

  131. A bit more info on the orbiting chap. by dbirchall · · Score: 1

    This article from China (in English) provides a good bit more information about Lieutenant Colonel Yang Liwei.

  132. Too Funny... by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    "China invented gunpowder and legend holds that a Ming dynasty (1368-1644) official named Wan Hu attempted the world's first space launch. He strapped himself to a chair with kites in each hand as 47 servants lit 47 gunpowder-packed bamboo tubes tied to the seat.

    When the smoke had cleared, Wan was found to have been obliterated. But the dream was not."
    -Reuter

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  133. Re:FUCK YOU TIMOTHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I imagine your submission was rejected by /.'s "total fucking douchebag" filter.

  134. The problem with chinese rocket launches... by NightWulf · · Score: 1
    after 30 minutes, you want to launch another one.

    Yeah bad joke :)

  135. The immorality of Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having read the article thoroughly, this startling news shows the flaws in the brewing Open Source Zeitgeist that is gripping the software community. Have you considered that providing software for free to countries such as China is essentially tacit support for oppressive regimes?

    Far-fetched? Think about it: With MySQL, the People's Army will now be able to do multiple queries on their tables of democratic activists in Olog(n) time instead of lengthy searches in card catalogs. The bureaucratic overhead previously allowed activists enough time to flee the country. How about building cheap firewalls so the people can't get the unbiased reporting that CNN provides? Or using Apache to publish lists of Falun Gong people to their police forces instantly? I doubt that never crossed your minds when you were coding away in your parents' basements. Consider putting that little thought in your mental resolv.conf file.

    If that does not concern you ( which it probably doesn't, since the slashdot.org paradigm is publishing articles about how not to pay for things ), consider something else. When China eventually goes to war with Taiwan, we want to be able turn their command and control facilities into the computing equivalent of a train-wreck. One of the advantages of Windows never mentioned in the article is the ability of Microsoft to remotely deactivate Windows XP in the case of a national emergency. Thanks to GNU/Lunix, Taiwan will be on a collision course with the mainland in the near future.

    Which throws into question Mr. Stallman's motives. A known proponent of socialism, the Chinese government and RMS are natural allies. Could it be a back door to Stallman's dream of an uber-Socialist United States? We may never know for sure. Next time you consider contributing to an open source project, ask yourself this question: don't you want to make sure your work isn't used for nefarious purposes? Will you risk having blood on your hands?

    1. Re:The immorality of Open Source by chrome · · Score: 1

      Nice troll - really gave me a good hearty laugh.

  136. Go easy on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like timothy, the mods have Down's Syndrom you now.

  137. Re:Indian Artical Insults Chinese Space Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I thought Indians and Chinese are supposed to be like brothers?
    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH
  138. Funny enough.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the article, the guy's name is actually: MUN-KE MAN

  139. Nerd checklist. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0

    -Communism...hmmm...hey, isn't information free there? Cool!

    -Space...technology...wow wow wow.

    -Asians. Hey, isn't that near Japan.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  140. China DOES have a long history of Exploration... by Cletus+the+yokel · · Score: 1

    Read 1421- The Year China Discovered The World, by Gavin Menzies. This book and it's author have been getting a lot of attention from the archeological community lately 9 see also here, here, here, etc. There's a lot of evidence that suggest that Zhang He's fleet continued east to the americas. Early Western explorers reportedly encountered chinese-speaking peoples in both South and North America.

    --
    Wanted: One witty yet thought provoking .sig - Apply here.
  141. Re:And the liberal slashbots are ecstatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey well if you don't want to get your ass kicked by 1.2 billion communists maybe you should have thought of that before you protected the renegade province Tawain.

    America couldn't possibly win a war with China, even right this minute!

    Why not?

    Can you imagine what would happen to the economy if China shut down all the American factories?

    What are you going to do? Bomb factories owned by American companies? Your economy would turn to shit in 2 weeks.

    Shit you can't even win the war in Iraq, you have absolutely no chance in China.

    You thought Vietnam and Korea where serious ass whippings? Bring it on, pigs.

  142. In case you haven't been paying attention... by Goonie · · Score: 1
    China has had ICBM's (not many, but enough) that can hit the continental US for some time now.

    Despite all protestations to the contrary, that fact is what missile defence is all about.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:In case you haven't been paying attention... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The difference between now and a decade ago is that they now obviously have the technology to accurately deliver a nuclear payload.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  143. Chinese by schnitzi · · Score: 1

    I'll bet an hour later, he wanted to go again!

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  144. har har har by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    outed any spies lately?

    --

    -pyrrho

  145. I for one... by bendude · · Score: 0

    I for one would like to welcome our new Chinese Taikonaut overlords, what with their planned moon bases and all.

    I'd also like to remind them that as a Slashdot reader, I could be usefull in rounding up others to slave away in their moon mines.

    --


    Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  146. The Race by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    everyone saying "uh the race is already over" is pulling from the book of "Things The Hare Said".

    An earnest program could easily outpace the current US ability which is tied up in Shuttles and the IIS. Those older style rockets are cheaper. They can get things out of earth orbit. Getting a man in space is to basically catch the hell up in one step.

    --

    -pyrrho

  147. Color me unimpressed by keyed · · Score: 1

    China's launched a man in orbit 42 years after the Soviets put the first man in space. A single man in a capsule. Using Russian technology. Realistically, China's space race is against John Carmack.

    1. Re:Color me unimpressed by Naelphin · · Score: 1
      The X-Prize is even less impressive than this.

      Sending one person not even in a full orbital is exciting how? Just because a government wasn't behind it?

  148. OT: FIX THE FUCKING SERVERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "On an unrelated note, someone fix the /. servers."

    YES! HOLY FUCKING SHIT THEY ARE SLOW!

    Why are you the only person yet to mention it - ITS FUCKING DRIVING ME NUTS!

  149. All these people worried... by RichardY · · Score: 1

    ...about the Chinese using satellites for military purposes are being a little hypocritical.

    I suppose you think that all the satellites that the US have put into space over the years are there simply to broadcast reruns of Frasier (Although that could be considered a form of warfare!).

    I also can't believe that the spell checker in open office corrected 'frasier' to 'Frasier'! Are American sitcom titles in the standard American dictionary now?

    1. Re:All these people worried... by bitmanipulator · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the odds are that chinas presence in outer space will prompt a revival of the start wars defence shield or similar programs. A new technology race with a little political will driving it would be great to start off this century.

    2. Re:All these people worried... by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      But it would be a tragedy if the Americans used this as an excuse to weaponize space. A manned space program has very few military purposes (that I am aware of), their primary purpose is science and engineering.

    3. Re:All these people worried... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      There is nothing hypocritical about saying - I want a gun in my hand but not in yours.

      Hypocritical would be saying- Everybody should be able to have spy satellites but not letting everybody have them. We have never done that. Same with nukes. It is not hypocritical to say no one should have nukes but us. That just makes sense.

      I hope that American never goes into an armed conflict again where the outcome is not a foregone conclusion. Why would you want military parity with nations that are hostile to many of the values you hold most dear?

      I guess I should put a gun near the door to my house- so if someone breaks in they can pick it up. I wouldn't want to be a hypocrite and be the only one in my home that is armed.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  150. Alright! Go China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congrats, Being an Asian I'm happy to see an Asian country in space.

    Awesome, Good Luck!

  151. Cheng Ho == Sinbad? by Comrade+Pikachu · · Score: 1

    Debatable, perhaps, but that may be a source of the legend. 7 voyages, and Cheng Ho (I've also heard it was pronounced "Sin Bao") does kind of sound like "Sinbad".

    The fact that Cheng Ho was a eunuch never made it into the legend, curiously enough.

  152. Taikon?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, are they sending gypsies?

  153. space base in the gobi desert.... by demonbug · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone have any insight into why the Chinese would build their space base in the Gobi Desert, which I believe is in the northern part of the country? Wouldn't it make more sense to stick it on the Tibetan Plateau or somewhere nearer the equator? IIRC, this is why the U.S. space program launches from southern Florida and why I believe most of the Soviet launch sites are in Kazakhtstan (aren't they?)? Just seems like it would make more sense to launch from the southwestern part of the country, where there are still very few people but you get boosts from being nearer the equator and being higher in elevation (you know, less distance to go and weaker gravity at launch, not to mention less air resistance (Hmm, speaking of which, maybe the U.S. should start launching from Mauna Kea instead of Florida - we could make a "space sea-plane" so it would be able to land back in Hawaii)). Just seems that the Gobi Desert, which I assume was chosen more for remoteness than anything else, wouldn't have been the best spot for them to stick their space program (but I guess if they have a launch failure it will impact Mongolia, not China, so maybe thats why).

    1. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      Just seems that the Gobi Desert, which I assume was chosen more for remoteness than anything else, wouldn't have been the best spot for them to stick their space program (but I guess if they have a launch failure it will impact Mongolia, not China, so maybe thats why).

      More importantly, China has a hell of a lot higher population density in parts. You would not want a major launch accident occurring over a more populated center. I'm sure the Chinese engineers weighed the extra costs of fuel etc. against the risk of loss of life and chose the desert as the best compromise between safe and economical.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    2. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by batlock · · Score: 1
      Anyone have any insight into why the Chinese would build their space base in the Gobi Desert, which I believe is in the northern part of the country?

      Maybe they're Perry Rhodan fans?
      --

      Batlock...

    3. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      China launches to the Northwest for the same reason the Russians do, it's in that direction that uninhabited territory is available to drop spent stages into.

      Elevation is really a null factor, less than 20% of a rockets fuel is spent getting it, the rest is spent getting it velocity sideways.

    4. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      You would not want a major launch accident occurring over a more populated center.

      Why not? For an accident to be really dangerous, the collateral targets would have to be extremely close.

      The penisula of Florida is a populous area of the USA, but the rather major launch catastrophe that happened there in 1986 didn't come close to hurting anyone one the ground. Nor did NASA see any reason to move future launches further into the wilderness.

      The distance from Orlando to Canaveral can easily be exceeded in many places near cities in southwest China. See this population map (TIFF), it's not that crowded there. And launching out over the ocean gives greater safety- insuring that no civilians are wandering beneath, and allowing splashdown recoveries.

      The only downside I can imagine to a southeast coastal positioning is the increased scrutiny from outsiders. US spyplanes could get a better view of the launch activity, while places like Japan, Taiwan, or SK might worry about huge Chinese projectiles passing over them at sub-orbital altitudes (Could that be military? They won't know until it bombs on them!)

      So maybe the Gobi desert was selected for privacy.

    5. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

      Expanding some on my earlier answer...

      The US launches from the Cape not to gain the equitorial boost (which is nice, but not terribly important), but because of geography. There are numerous launch angles from there that are far enough out to sea as not to endanger inhabited islands, but close enough to those islands for telemetry and radar stations to be put there. This was *very* important in the early days.

      Russia's manned launch center is placed where the capsules final descent is over Russian territory from shortly before retrofire. This is/was an important consideration because their communications depend on ground stations, and the Russians were/are paranoid about putting those outside it's borders.

      The siting of a launch center depends on numerous complex issues.

    6. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by XNormal · · Score: 1

      Plesetsk cosmodrome is located at the far north of russia. You don't need an equatorial launch site for high inclination or polar missions. Military earth observation missions tend to have such orbits. Make not mistake - this is a military mission. At this moment Yang Liwei is probably too busy operating a military payload to enjoy the flight. The orbital module will remain in orbit for several months after the return capsule lands and continue its mission.

      The Jinquan space launch center is almost 1km above sea level. This contributes to the launch vehicle performance, though not as dramatically as an equatorial location for equatorial orbits.

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    7. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by Giddeon · · Score: 1

      I would guess that political reasons figure into the picture. Building rocket facilities further south would likely raise the concerns of a number of nations. By placing the facility to the north, they probably avoided a great deal of slowdown.

    8. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      Vandenberg AFB in California is the source of all near polar orbit satellite launches in the US. And I recall there being another launch site for the military on the eastern seaboard, in Virginia perhaps (?).

    9. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      NASA launches over the sea from Florida, ain't much folks around there...

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    10. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 0

      >Anyone have any insight into why the Chinese would build their space base in the Gobi Desert?

      So that they don't have to move their TV crew to film those moon scenes!

    11. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by drgreedy · · Score: 1

      Two reasons that I know of for choosing the launch site: 1) Low population density should something goes wrong during launch 2) The weather pattern of the area is such that it is clear sky, no rain, no clouds about 250 days out of the year I got those watching the Chinese news channel. They were talking about this nonstop.

    12. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      I would guess, Cape Canaveral was constructed with logistics in mind. Remember, the base was built at a time when jet planes were fairly new, and that time, the fastest route to deliver large rocket components (eg; tanks, primary stages, etc) was by road or rail.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    13. Re:space base in the gobi desert.... by CZ2F · · Score: 1

      There are lots of storms in the south part of China. They considered to build one lauch pad in Hainan Island ( close to Vitenam ) but canceled it due to reason mentioned above. Actualy, they have one lauch pad in Xi Chang ( south ) to lauch globe static satelite.

  154. Inferiority complex? by gklinger · · Score: 1, Troll
    I hope this isn't taken out of context because I mean no insult nor do I mean to belittle what China has done but am I only the only one that thinks China has a massive inferiority complex?

    They seem so desperate to prove to the rest of the world that they're not backwards or technologically inept or whatever it is. They're obsessed with getting into space, building skyscrapers that are taller than those in other countries and they're sinking billions into modernizing Beijing to impress the world during the Olympcs. If all this results in a higher quality of life for the Chinese people, I'm all for it. Unfortunately, I don't think it will.

    1. Re:Inferiority complex? by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

      I hope this isn't taken out of context because I mean no insult nor do I mean to belittle what the USA has done but am I only the only one that thinks the USA has a massive inferiority complex?

      They seem so desperate to prove to the rest of the world that they're not backwards or technologically inept or whatever it is. They're obsessed with getting into space, building skyscrapers that are taller than those in other countries and they sunk billions into modernizing Salt Lake City, Atlanta, and LA to impress the world during the Olympcs. If all this results in a higher quality of life for the USA people, I'm all for it. Unfortunately, I don't think it will.

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    2. Re:Inferiority complex? by LazloTheDog · · Score: 1
      The question you pose can be taken at a different level. Many developments in China become much more clear if you take the long view. The Chinese have viewed the rest of the world as inferior for milleinia. Then the west came along in the last couple centuries and poked a few holes in that in a big way, yet it remains entwined in their mindset, perhaps with a vengence. Despite numerous faults, Richard Nixon was an astute obsever of the international playing field, he felt that the 21rst Century would be the Chinese century. This is but an early step along the road to getting things to where the Chinese feel they are supposed to be.

      JM

      --
      Oink, Oink!!
    3. Re:Inferiority complex? by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      Have you heard about their revolution in manufacturing? It's not just for show...

    4. Re:Inferiority complex? by hector76 · · Score: 1

      why do you think china are spending the only resource they have completely on space? why don't the americans spend more money on improving the economy instead of the 87 billion in Iraq?

    5. Re:Inferiority complex? by vudufixit · · Score: 1

      This guy didn't deserve to have his comment marked as a troll.
      Please revisit your thinking, moderators.

    6. Re:Inferiority complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why don't the americans spend more money on improving the economy instead of the 87 billion in Iraq?

      Just remember, there's two L's in Halliburton!

    7. Re:Inferiority complex? by gklinger · · Score: 1
      On the contrary, I believe the USA has a massive superiority complex. The difference between a superiority and inferiority complex is that you must accomplish impressive feats to develop the first and you must live in the shadow of the group who accomplishes those feats to develop the second.

      As for your sarcasm, I am neither Chinese nor American. I am a Canadian. We've got an inferiority complex too (although few are willing to admit it). We're proud of our accomplisments (you know, like a fair and just society that protects all its members equally) but for reasons I can't fathom, we don't consider it enough. I guess that's what happens when you live beside a 900lb gorilla. Perhaps China has a similar psychologoical relationship with Russia?

    8. Re:Inferiority complex? by gklinger · · Score: 1
      Thank you. Contrary to the moderation, I didn't intended it as a troll. I was expressing an opinion in the hope that it would stimulate an intelligent and enlightening discussion on the topic. My mistake? I posted it here rather than at Kuro5shin. You see, Slashdot isn't a place for dissenting opinions. It's a place for posting repetitive (tired) jokes and agreeing with the opinion de jour.

      I've long thought that Slashdot should add 'provocative' as a moderation choice. Some posts may make people uncomfortable while raising good points. This will probably get moderated as a troll too (if anyone with moderation points get this deep into an aging story, which I doubt). Truth hurts.

      PS- The part about Kuro5hin WAS a troll.

    9. Re:Inferiority complex? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 0

      Slashdot isn't a place for dissenting opinions. It's a place for posting repetitive (tired) jokes and agreeing with the opinion de jour.

      I couldn't agree with that more. You mustn't forget the ignorant posting of information as facts.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    10. Re:Inferiority complex? by rifter · · Score: 1

      The question you pose can be taken at a different level. Many developments in China become much more clear if you take the long view. The Chinese have viewed the rest of the world as inferior for milleinia. Then the west came along in the last couple centuries and poked a few holes in that in a big way, yet it remains entwined in their mindset, perhaps with a vengence. Despite numerous faults, Richard Nixon was an astute obsever of the international playing field, he felt that the 21rst Century would be the Chinese century. This is but an early step along the road to getting things to where the Chinese feel they are supposed to be.

      I am inclined to agree with you. This is much like the fear the US developed of Japanese technological and economic superiority which, for me was an outgrowth of changes resulting from our challenge presented to them in the 1800's. In other words, Oriental cultures considered themselves superior, but were faced with the technology of the West which they could not counter, and the power of global trade.

      Japan and China have spent the time since trying to counter this buy expanding trade and increasing focus on technology. Japan has been more successful so far, but now that our industries are being exported and the federal government is creating laws to hamper US innovation it is giving China a major leg up.

      Before we know it the Chinese will be the number one producer and launcher of satellites in the world, will own the moon either de facto or overtly, and will have designs on the rest of the solar system while the US can barely get anything into orbit anymore. That is, unless we wake up again like we did in the 90's when US technology was king. We seem to have this pattern of letting things lie until we become an underdog in some area, getting beat by some other country and then suddenly waking up to that fact and starting in again. I guess that describes the Asian problem as well, so maybe this is just human nature. Still I would feel better if our country was more committed to maintaining a constantly escalating standard of excellence.

      In another note, this is offtopic, but I had previously noticed this post in which you comment on some obscure texts on Alexander the Great you have been reading. I was wondering if you could give a lay scholar some recommendations in this area, because I am very interested in laying hands on as much material as possible here.

  155. The only link you'll need by Herbst · · Score: 1
  156. Re:And the liberal slashbots are ecstatic. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    Only someone living in a cave (a typical home of a conservative) would not notice that the conservatives are the ones always waging wars. Who is killing innocent people, while losing their own soldiers in a bogus imperial quest of empire building and oil addiction?

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  157. Re:AND YOU TOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with your attitude id reject your stories too.

    they probably had 13,000 submissions, were typing up the story and waaaa yours didnt get accepted, waaa so unfair, everyones plotting against you, obviously, waaaaa.

  158. go china! by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    keep the dream alive

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  159. Re:China DOES have a long history of Exploration.. by Basehart · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere that archeologists discovered a pair of fossilized chopsticks at Stonehenge!

  160. Do what you always do... by melted · · Score: 1

    Do what you always do and you'll get what you always get, or so the wisdom says. I know some folks who have actually been to China last year and 20 years ago. They say A LOT of things have changed for the better there. I won't be surprised if China becomes the world's most powerful country in 50 years. The have all it takes to become one - huge, well controlled population, ideology, science, and most of all the desire to get better and patience in getting there. They don't rush things. They say if it takes fifty years, so be it. They invest a lot into their industry and science. If they say they'll get a man to the moon, they will get people there, eventually.

    Sure, space exploration and quality of life are not terribly related if you look at the surface. But without things like these China will always be the country in which large American corporations exploit cheap labor. Give it time, they'll make their own computers, write their own software, make their own satellites, spaceships, nuclear weapons, anti-missile systems, and so on and so forth. And then suddenly we'll find ourselves going there to work on "H1-B" visas.

  161. Not my joke, but still a good one... by Braintrust · · Score: 1

    Congratulations China, welcome to the 1960's!

    --
    Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
    1. Re:Not my joke, but still a good one... by mpaque · · Score: 1

      > Congratulations China, welcome to the 1960's!

      Uh huh.

      Care to guess how the next crew is getting to the "International Space Station"?

      Hint: It involves a big ole multi-stage rocket of proven reliability, and a capsule remarkably similar to what China just put in orbit.

    2. Re:Not my joke, but still a good one... by vidarh · · Score: 1

      So where is the US at now, then? Considering the Chinese at the moment is the nation with the most advanced non-grounded space craft... And even with the shuttle in operation, the Chinese now have a craft that is vastly cheaper and more up to date technically.

    3. Re:Not my joke, but still a good one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Care to guess how the next crew is getting to the "International Space Station"?"

      "Hint: It involves a big ole multi-stage rocket of proven reliability, and a capsule remarkably similar to what China just put in orbit."

      Wow, aren't you the clever one...

    4. Re:Not my joke, but still a good one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So where is the US at now, then? Considering the Chinese at the moment is the nation with the most advanced non-grounded space craft... And even with the shuttle in operation, the Chinese now have a craft that is vastly cheaper and more up to date technically."

      What a bunch of utter nonsense. Feeling insecure, are we?

  162. Re:Indian Congratulates Chinese Launch by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
    As a Frederik Pohl fan, I hope he isn't going to be right about China.

    = 9J =

  163. Outside Verification? by NeuroManson · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Just wondering if anyone's presented snapshots and/or audio recordings of the craft in orbit.

    The pictures released by the Chinese media appear to be forged (I'm no rocket scientist, no pun intended), don't rockets typically have some form of a visable exhaust cloud/contrail?

    Additionally, the rocket plume looks a little *too* ordered, and the launch vehicle itself looks a little *too* sharp around the edges, as if they knew exactly what focal length they set the cameras for (kind of like a cheap model)

    Maybe with luck the Chinese will release actual footage of the launch?

    Don't get me wrong, if they did it, cool beans. But between the first capsule tests and first manned launch, seems to be just a little too error free, and a little too quick in the achievements department to be real. Considering the craft is a knockoff of the Soyuz capsules, it still takes a while to get the engineering just right.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Outside Verification? by bani · · Score: 1

      "The pictures released by the Chinese media appear to be forged (I'm no rocket scientist, no pun intended), don't rockets typically have some form of a visable exhaust cloud/contrail?"

      nope. liquid fueled. look at the visible exhaust cloud from the shuttle's main engines. or rather, don't, because there isn't any.

      there are also plenty of film of american launches of purely liquid fueled rockets with no visible exhaust cloud.

      you do notice there's a contrail later, when the rocket gets high enough that water vapor from the liquid fueled rocket condenses in the cold air.

      take your conspiracy theories elsewhere, and your tinfoil hat too.

    2. Re:Outside Verification? by NeuroManson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "take your conspiracy theories elsewhere, and your tinfoil hat too."

      Oooh, a false argument AND a flame in one posting, you must be very proud of yourself. Are you sure you aren't working for the Chinese state run media? You seem awfully keen to defend China for not providing significant proof.

      The Atlas rockets used in the Mercury and Gemini launches, along with the Saturn V used for Apollo/Skylab launches were all chemical rockets. And *dramatic chord* ALL of them had shown contrails from the moment they launched. And do we know why, kids?

      They ran on the chemical reaction of oxygen and hydrogen to form large clouds of *tadah* WATER VAPOR! And this is in the very humid state of Florida. And despite the Chinese launch taking place in a desert, that water vapor would be considerably more evident in an explosive reaction between propellant and oxidizer of any type.

      So why, then, doesn't the Chinese rocket show such a reaction, and in fact look more like a crappy photoshop job the more I look at it, eh?

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    3. Re:Outside Verification? by TWagers · · Score: 1

      It would be pretty easy to find out, the US (and presumably Russia) both have satellites in orbit that can detect any major missle or rocket launch within seconds, and I'm sure that once it's in low earth orbit that Norad, SDC, and a host of other tracking sites could easily see it.

      However, China has no reason to fake this. It's pretty clear that they've been wanting this for a while, and trying to fake it would be disasterous.

      As far as the exaust, they use a different fuel than the shuttle uses, it's hydrogen peroxide based I believe, and it was chosen in large part due to it's less toxic exaust plume. It wouldn't surprise me if it burned a lot cleaner than the mix we use.

    4. Re:Outside Verification? by bani · · Score: 3, Informative

      water vapor is invisible until it condenses. and at ground level it takes an awful lot of water vapor to be visible. and it isnt generally visible for very long at ground level. thats why when you boil water, its visible for maybe a second or two, then disappates.

      well ask yourself why you're breathing out WATER VAPOR, but its not making huge clouds every time you breathe? because it ain't condensing, bucko.

      it'll condense in winter, but the air is very cold then.

      tah dah. basic gradeschool physics.

      your tinfoil hat needs adjusting, as well as your basic education.

    5. Re:Outside Verification? by hughk · · Score: 1
      The photo I have seen of the launch looks quite typical of a modern liquid fueled rocket. There is no 'smoke' as there are no solids. The plume as such (mostly condensed water) starts a long way after the engine nozzle. On the pad, deflectors send this to the side so it isn't so easy to see unless you zoom out.

      It would be very difficult to fake a luanch these days. Too many countries are looking up (and down). We can be 100% certain that there is a capsule in space orbiting the earth. Whether it is manned is another question, however although vehicle to ground communications may be encrypted, it can be clear that transmissions are coming from the capsule.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    6. Re:Outside Verification? by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Try asking yourself why the Chinese would bother faking pictures of a Long March launch when the Long March rockets have years of testing and is proven to be one of the most reliable launchers available?

      If indeed they wanted to fake anything, the only thing worth faking would be the presence of an astronaut aboard the craft, not what for most purposes is a routine launch.

    7. Re:Outside Verification? by NeuroManson · · Score: 0, Troll

      In case you haven't noticed, water vapor can condense in high humidity/high temperature areas as well, kiddo. Basic gradeschool physics back atcha. Ever hear of a thing called dew point?

      But hey, lets see the proof, you know, from the people who claimed to launch the vehicle? As many people out there who can photoshop a picture as there are, all we have to go by is AP's pictures, supplied to them BY the Chinese. In other words, FAR from anything resembling an impartial source.

      In other words, NOT PROOF.

      Something you have failed immensely to provide, and guaging from your replies, something one would expect from a 13 year old, what could hardly be considered as an expert on the subject, let alone someone who grew up observing studying and the space programs their entire life.

      Go back to school little one.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    8. Re:Outside Verification? by NeuroManson · · Score: 0

      Oh, and you failed to make any mention of my previous inquiry, showing you to be nothing more than a troll.

      (1) We have no ground observatories reporting the capsule in orbit.

      (2) We have no radio tracking services reporting communications from the capsule in orbit.

      One would think they would notice either (1) or (2) if the launch was factual.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    9. Re:Outside Verification? by bani · · Score: 1

      http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/ktc lips/apollo_11_liftoff.mpg
      http://www.hq.nasa.gov /office/pao/History/alsj/ktc lips/ap15_liftoff.mpg

      where's all the smoke?

    10. Re:Outside Verification? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Judging from both links giving a 404 error, I'd say there were none.

      http://images.google.com/images?q=apollo+launch& ie =UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en

      On the other hand, has PLENTY.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    11. Re:Outside Verification? by bani · · Score: 1

      its that difficult to remove the spaces from the slashdot-mangled urls?

      no wonder you have such difficulty with basic gradeschool physics.

    12. Re:Outside Verification? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wasting your time with this one i'm afraid.
      In my experience trying to reason with these people is like trying to debate a paranoid schizophrenic.
      It's largely a waste of time.

      You'll have better luck trying to convert a fundamentalist christian into atheism.

    13. Re:Outside Verification? by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      it's a simple thing for nasa, ESA et. al. to check if the chinese got something up there or not. o course they've done so and of course they would have voiced consern if there was nothing to be found up there. For christ sake, it's not like the chinese haven't put stuff up in LEO before (think satellites) , it's not even the first time they put the capsule up there, it's only the first time it's manned

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    14. Re:Outside Verification? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      So are you one of those guys that say we never made it to the moon?

      Don't you think that every friggin radar station NORAD has on the planet is tracking that thing? Don't you think that they saw the heat plume immediately upon launch and started watching it then?

      Don't you think that maybe JUST MAYBE it's not the place of the US Government, or any other government besides China's to reproduce or rebroadcast China's military transmissions? You can't even rebroadcast / reproduce transmissions of baseball games without the written authorization of the commissioner of Major League Baseball.

      Don't you think there would be some diplomatic hot water, or perhaps showing some of NSA / CIA's cards if they were to do so?

      Sell conspiracy somewhere else, we're all stocked up here.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    15. Re:Outside Verification? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Ooh, someone decided to gang up on me too, by getting his buddies to mod down my original question "Has anyone verified this?", and then, when I respond to the personal attack, the previous posting gets modded to flamebait. Did anyone modding this actually read the thread in question?

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    16. Re:Outside Verification? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Stop with the conspiracy kook line. I believe we made it to the moon. However, it wouldn't take much for any agency to state that there WAS a capsule in orbit.

      Remember Sputnik? When that was launched, the US and European agencies verified the launch within hours, and broadcast it over the news media shortly afterwards. So what's keeping them from doing so now, in an age when a news report can be issued seconds after verification?

      THAT is what I'm asking. And honestly, you should be ashamed for deciding to flame rather than at least ask the same question.

      Until the Chinese release footage, or anyone with a telescope or radio reciever can verify there's a capsule in orbit, the publicity photos released by the Chinese will remain just that. Publicity photos.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    17. Re:Outside Verification? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Asking for proof is neither paranoia or conspiracy related. It's a legitimate (but thanks to the replies, now has been modded into obscurity) inquiry as to whether or not the launch was verified. Ground stations could verify these things right off the bat, and yet nobody has done so.

      So why is everyone so defensive of the Chinese, and so desperate to avoid the issue, lowering themselves to flaming and personal attacks, rather than *gasp* saying something as simple as "I don't know"?

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    18. Re:Outside Verification? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      So why is everyone so defensive of the Chinese, and so desperate to avoid the issue, lowering themselves to flaming and personal attacks, rather than *gasp* saying something as simple as "I don't know"?

      I suspect the reason people aren't saying "I don't know" in response to your interesting proposition is pretty simple: they do know, and you were wrong. It happens to all of us, though most often to myself.

      I agree that your initial posting deserves better moderation, but I don't think the moderation cabal is after you for political reasons. I suspect someone came across your sometimes-inflamatory replies, didn't get the joke (if any), and *then* followed the thread to the top and modded you down. Not fair, but understandable.

      I'll see what I can do in M2, though the chance of running across any related moderations is a value of x where x < slim and x > none.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  164. Old Joke: by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    Me Chinese
    Me pray joke
    Me put rocket in you ass. Opppsies!

    hahahahhahahaa funeee

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  165. Re:Indian Artical Insults Chinese Space Plan by ryen · · Score: 0

    >lets see them put a base on the moon
    lets see them feed their starving people first, before spending millions on their space exploration

  166. Re:FUCK YOU TIMOTHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no kidding. it's a total scam. I submitted the monkey-mind controlled robot arm article an hour after the first articles were published anywhere, and it was rejected. It'll end up on \. in a week though.

  167. Congratulations, Russian Engineers! by DasBub · · Score: 1

    The speed of technology transfer is amazing!

    It only took one communist state 35 years to copy the designs of another communist state.

    Does this mean Cuba is close behind in the space race?

    1. Re:Congratulations, Russian Engineers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And where do you think the americans got their technology from, you utter imbecile. Wan't me to refresh your memory? The Germans, or, to be more precise, Nazi rocket engineers. At least the Chineese co-operated with engineers that hold the same political ideals. Tosser.

    2. Re:Congratulations, Russian Engineers! by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Well... more accurately Americans got their *first generation* engine tech from German engineers.

      However, so did the Soviets - a little factiod most overlook.

      Note that these first generation American engines tended to explode.

      Another fact that most ignore is that the German engineers practically worshipped Robert Goddard: whom they considered the father of modern rocketry.

      Goddard was American, BTW.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  168. Be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Saturn V is about as similar to a WWII design as an F-18 is to a Sopwith Camel.


    To be fair, you should be comparing the Vostok R7/A1/SL3 or Mercury Redstone to a WWII design. From the latter page:


    "The Redstone missile is considered to be the successor of the German V-2. Research conducted on the V-2 at the Army's White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico gave way to a number of improvements. These improvements were incorporated into the Redstone missile, which was designed by the ABMA (Army Ballistic Missile Agency)."

  169. Re:Indian Artical Insults Chinese Space Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, if India decides to go to space, does this mean they will need all their programmers working on that project, and some Previously-Outsourced IT guys can get their jobs back?

  170. I seem to remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    45 years ago, when we were starting NASA, China was well, kind of busy. They've had a rough century; you really ought to give them a bit of slack while they take the time to catch up with everyone else.

  171. Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot full of assholes. General shock and astonishment at this surprising news. Film at 11.

  172. Chinese go into space by WhoReallyCares · · Score: 1

    ...but not all of them.

  173. Re:Not Impressed - absolutely! by tloh · · Score: 1

    YES!!!

    We should sue them on behalf of NASA for patent infringements!
    I'll bet Darl can offer insights!

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  174. Re:Indian Artical Insults Chinese Space Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...like the US did before it startet going to the moon, right?

    Fuck off, moron.

  175. the answer -- secrecy by bani · · Score: 1

    they accomplished it pretty well, didn't they?

    the whole project and launch caught the west totally by suprise.

    1. Re:the answer -- secrecy by Sokie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, cause we totally have no idea where this top secret facility is or what it looks like. If Space Imaging has these kinds of pictures of it, I imagine the NSA was double checking the equations on the Chinese engineers' clipboards.

      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    2. Re:the answer -- secrecy by bani · · Score: 1

      they had no idea it was a manned mission, the fact caught everyone by suprise.

      did you see ANYONE reporting a chinese manned mission before october?

      i reiterate -- the secrecy worked well.

    3. Re:the answer -- secrecy by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Uhm, yeah, it's kind of been expected for MONTHS, and the guesses have gotten progressively better.

    4. Re:the answer -- secrecy by bani · · Score: 1

      months eh? so you should be able to provide a citation dated around july?

    5. Re:the answer -- secrecy by rimmon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, google for chinese manned space mission.
      The first result: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/china-02zi.html
      Date: Apr 9, 2002 !
      I quote:
      In a report that the Chinese media widely published on Apr. 3 and 4, a space official hinted strongly that China would attempt the first manned launch with the Shenzhou-5 (SZ-5) mission next year

      Hot damn, that was a surprise. They published it only 18 months earlier. Manned space missions from China? Who knew??

    6. Re:the answer -- secrecy by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      BWAAAAAhahahahahaha

      I love it when people are so stubborn about an idea that they will ride it flaming all the way to the bottom.

      Oh, and this is WAY off topic, so I'm guessing it will be moderated down, and I'm counting on it.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  176. Not true by whiteygonnapay · · Score: 1

    I read on the Go Taikonauts site last week and somewhere else but I can't remember where (I think it was the cbc) that the launch would take place Oct 15 at 9:00am Bejing time which it did.

  177. Some background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Officially, Chinese claim that Shenzhou 5 is %100 chinese. Unofficially, they say that russian technologies, expertise, and some parts for the rocket and spaceship were "so well paid, that they may be considered chinese".

    In 1994 Jiang Zemin and Boris Eltsin preliminarily agreed on Russian-Chinese cooperation in space exploration. In March 1995 they signed a secret agreement on tranfer of russian technologies, as well as sale of rocket components, space suits and key systems of Soyuz to China. The agreement included training of several chinese cosmonauts. In 1996-1997 two Chinese aviators underwent a 14-month course in Russian Training Center, reportedly, for $1mln. Chinese experts thoroughly studied the process of the training. In March 2000 China striked a new accord with Russia, which included production of parts of future "Chinese" space station, more training of the Chinese cosmonauts as well as the earth-bound personnel.

    According to experts, China spent some $120mln in Russia on space technologies, parts and services (remark: I wonder how much was spent in US). Total cost of the program was estimated at $2.3bln, which included designing, production, and launch of 3 unmanned and 1 manned spaceships.

    1. Re:Some background by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      According to experts, China spent some $120mln in Russia on space technologies, parts and services

      I suspect the USA spent at least that much in Russia during the first space race, trying to keep tabs on them! (And vice-versa too)

  178. Ablative reusability by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Just because a spacecraft has ablative shielding does not mean that can't be reusable. All it means is that the shielding needs to be replaced. They did this with one of the gemini capsules.

    Personally, I think that the re-entry vehicle should be ablatively protected, with soft wings, ie a parafoil or parasail based system.

  179. That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    Here's one of CNN's takes on the Chinese space program:

    http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/10/12/china.p ro paganda.ap/index.html

    CNN, Fox etc have no desire to make this story anything other than a "Chinese aiming to take the war into space therefore we must develop Star Wars and increase defence spending to counter the new threat." Watch for lots of militaristic quotes by Chinese "officials" in your news stories in relation to this event.

    The US press is, by and large, simply a mouthpiece for US propaganda as much as it is "real" news. To have them laugh at the Chinese for their space program is rather ironic given the recent spate of US space failures. Remember also that Cape Canaveral was designed so that the viewing gallery was lined up with the launch pad and sunset, to generate more evocative photos. I love good space PR photos as much as the next guy, but to have CNN badmouth the Chinese for their PR is simply a disgusting display of just how screwed up the "free" US is today.

    Americans, the most important lesson I can impress upon you is this: Take everything your media tells you with a large helping of salt, and do your best to find out the real story behind the "story". If you view everything by asking "What is the real purpose of this story?" and trying to work out who has the most to gain by giving you the story in the context you see it in, then you will be one step closer to being able to figure out the world around you without being blinded by your own country's propaganda (and don't kid yourself, it IS propaganda).

    To the Chinese I say well done and congratulations on your achievement. May we work together in space as a united species forever, free from earthly politics and prejudices, to go further and faster than we ever have before, for the greater good of mankind.

    Quizo69

    1. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by danheskett · · Score: 1

      To the Chinese I say well done and congratulations on your achievement. May we work together in space as a united species forever, free from earthly politics and prejudices, to go further and faster than we ever have before, for the greater good of mankind.

      To suggest that this move by the Chinnese has anything to with the greater good of anything is a stretch - unless that good is the Communist party of China. The space program in China is a stunning piece of national and international propaganda, designed to move Chineese politics to the mainstream. Nothing more. The 60's space race was a test of the power of respective governments to marshall resources towards a goal - aka - "look what we can do" attitudes prevailed.

      This is a neat accomplishment, for sure. But it is clearly designed to boost the image of the government of China.

      One of the greatest things about US culture is that it produces a media that is massively diverse. Regardless of what you think of recent consolidation the fact remains that the US press and media is amoung the most, if not clearly the most, diverse media in the world. Thanks to the culture and politics of the US there are more opinions, more views, and more ideas presented here than anywhere in the world. And best yet thanks to our society and how it is setup, we have access to the entire catalog of American media, as well as any number of international sources.

      All this means that virtually every US citizen has access to dozens, hundreds, if not thousands of perspectives on news, events, politics, religion, arts, culture, sports and everything else under the sun. In other nations, this is simply untrue. Best yet, the US exports these values and through its own ingeniuty people the world over benefit from our core values of information interchange and diversity.

      This hasn't always been the case. This hasn't been the default situation of the world. Most of the world doesn't enjoy even the side effects of our culture of interchange. Most have a single source of information. Most have monocultural data feed to them without chance for analysis or differentation.

      The US media isn't perfect by a longshot, but it is pretty close to ideal. Suppression of information is impossible. It is immune against total geo-political influence. It is ultimately beholden only to the people who consume the content, and it is infinitely diverse.

      You tell us to think about the news. Thanks for the advice, but thats been part of the American cultural psyche since this country was conceived.

    2. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The space program in China is a stunning piece of national and international propaganda, designed to move Chineese politics to the mainstream. Nothing more."

      You speak of it as if it is a bad thing. There are far less constructive ways to move politics in the mainstream. The cost and danger involved with building a human space program require some sort of incentive for politicians. In the end however, China's fortray into space can only be good for science.

      Saying that they wouldn't work together with us in space would probably counter that motive. China is seeking respect as an equal as an nation. Being seen working as an equal with the US and other nations would confirm thier wish.

    3. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      One of the greatest things about US culture is that it produces a media that is massively diverse. Regardless of what you think of recent consolidation the fact remains that the US press and media is amoung the most, if not clearly the most, diverse media in the world. Thanks to the culture and politics of the US there are more opinions, more views, and more ideas presented here than anywhere in the world. And best yet thanks to our society and how it is setup, we have access to the entire catalog of American media, as well as any number of international sources.

      ROFLOL! I dare you to walk in to a bar in a small town in say Kansas State and shout out loud, "I'm gay and I'm proud!".

      The US is fine as long as you're white, xtian, straight and male. I wonder how long a gay pagan goth would survive in much of the country. As a nation th US is paranoid, isolationist and egotistical.

    4. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese don't like you dumbass, you're the enemy.

    5. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But of course, being from the UK, you have no idea what you are talking about.

    6. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      But of course, being from the UK, you have no idea what you are talking about

      Generally or specifically. Generally I know quite a lot about what I talk about. Specifically I have American friends, I'm a member of international mailing lists and I read the media, both British and American. I hear about the hate crimes and the deaths, and what has happened to friends and why they keep their sexuality or beliefs secret. Are you telling me incidents like Brandon Teena ("Boy's don't cry") don't happen? Get real!

    7. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by danheskett · · Score: 1

      ROFLOL! I dare you to walk in to a bar in a small town in say Kansas State and shout out loud, "I'm gay and I'm proud!".
      The good thing about the US is that if you want to live amoung people who think homosexuality is a nasty vile thing, you can do that. Likewise, if you want to reveal in the homosexual hedonism that many extremists do, then you also can. If you want to live an unassuming life you can do that as well.

      Its all up to the citizen. That's a really nice thing: choice.

      Now, about your specific implication: that walking into Kanasas and shouting "I'm gay" would somehow cause you grevious harm. I won't. There are gay pride style marches all over the place including the "heartland" and other places.

      The US is fine for just about anyone. Hell, in this country you can live with just about any disorder, affliction, or lifestyle choice you want and find a place to "fit in". Its not a true statement elsewhere.

    8. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Brandon Teena ("Boy's don't cry")
      Yes, Criminals get killed all the time all over the place. However, the simple fact remains that there are very few violent hate crimes in the US, and even less of the type you mention.

      Last weeks issue of Time had a huge spread on being Gay in the midwest of the US - Wymoning specifically. The consensus is it's no big deal.

      More past that, in this country, you can find a place to fit in, no matter your beliefs or lifestyle. What more can one ask for? If you are a person who does not value diversity, who wishes to be around people who are white and protestant, you can move to that type of an area. If you want to live with a monoculture of Chineese, or Italian, or African-American or Irish Americans you can do that, and people do.

      Look up the stastics however, in the worst of the places in the US there are only rare cases of violent hate crime against gays or minorities.

    9. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by malsdavis · · Score: 0

      I think you have misthought the motives of modern western news organisations. In these days of free markets and extreme commericialisation, the intent of media/news organisations is not (with china being the exception) to spread federal properganda but to get lots and lots of people to keep on reading their website/newspaper or to watch their news program. In my opinion this is even worse than the properganda spreading intent of these companies during the 50's/60's. It accounts for why you only ever hear negative stories about government and the world, this is because it has been scientifically proven that people return to read negative news far more than positive stories. This means that as you mentioned, the only way to make a good story out of this event is to turn it around from an amazing and positive achievement by a country into a negative story of possible far-fetched military applications by an "aggressive" country (this coming from one which has just been the invader in 2 unprovoked wars commenting on a country which has been at relative peace for the last few decades).

    10. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, please tell that to the gay kid that got lashed to a fence in Texas by his fellow students and left to die. Please, go tell his family that he was a criminal, and that his death was natural.

      Tell him that he was a statistical anomaly.

      That, really, this doesn't happen much.

      Say that he was an exception, a fluke.

      Maybe tell them that he deserved it, that he made the choice of being gay, or for telling people he was gay.

      You claim that people are free to do whatever they want and obtain whatever information they want or need to make a decision, and yet, I don't see how you can so blind to issues like these. You are *not* free to say whatever you want, and not expect bodily harm. Tell it to Rodney King, to Matthew Shepard.

    11. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add: "If you're not from arabian descent."

    12. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by falsified · · Score: 1
      I just have to jump in here. I'm as liberal as the next guy, but Rodney King - and I want you to sit down for this - had it coming. He was completely loaded on PCP and had literally been throwing the police around for ten minutes before they took out their clubs. Both officers were considerably injured and they were acting in self-defense.

      Rodney King was pulled over for going 120 in a residential area. An area where children play. He was on drugs and committed assault against two police officers and was winning. The police did what they needed to do to subdue him long enough to place him under arrest. It could be argued that the police hit him longer than necessary but it's hard to judge that from a distant camera - and probably even harder if you just were the victim of assault.

      If someone was on PCP and started kicking the shit out of me, and I had a gun and a stick on me, guess which weapon I would have picked. It wouldn't matter if he were black.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    13. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Tell him that he was a statistical anomaly

      He was. I would tell that to his family. That type of thing doesn't happen every day. Period.

      That, really, this doesn't happen much.

      It doesn't. I'd tell them that. It is a rare occurance. Something similiar hasn't happened since.

      Maybe tell them that he deserved it, that he made the choice of being gay, or for telling people he was gay

      I wouldn't tell that, it's not true. However, let's be clear. He did have a hand in his own death. He was in a bar late at night. He left the bar on his will to get into the truck of two men he didnt know on the premise that they'd be involved in anonymous group sex. He didnt deserve to die, but people who act recklessly with their own life - gay, straight, woman, man, all stripes, often end up dead. Getting into a truck with two people you dont know, have no intention of knowing, and no absolutely nothing about is not a good idea.

      I don't see how you can so blind to issues like these.

      Two cases do not create a pattern. There is no pattern of murder against gay men in this country. There is no pattern of murder against blacks in this country. It simply doesn't exisit. The cases you bring up are exactly what you mentioned: stastical rarities. They deserve to be studied, reflected on, and then forgotten to all but family and criminiologists.

      You are *not* free to say whatever you want, and not expect bodily harm.

      In the United States you are.

    14. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      "free from earthly politics and prejudices" Unlike their efforts in Tibet.

    15. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by White+Shade · · Score: 1

      "Surpression of information is impossible"

      Bah! how are you supposed to prove that? if the information was supressed, THEY are not gonna tell you that they surpressed something.. It't surpressed, and so we remain blissfully ignorant!

      I think your confidence in America is rather unfounded, or at least a bit naive. The other replies to your post make that pretty clear as well; i just had to point out the hilarity of your one particular phrase.

      --
      ìì!
    16. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Maverick2219 · · Score: 1

      Yeah you're absolutely correct. I can remember in my town we burn out this family of arabs about two years ago that live up the street from me. Then we when to the Afghani family's house that's a block away from mine.

      In truth if I remember correctly one of my neighbors was arrested shortly after the attacks for beating the shit out of someone that was harrassing the arab family. Yeah, we've got a close 'hood.

      --
      I try to make everyone's day a little more surreal.
    17. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no. CNN relly tries to get it right. Fox is the government mouthpiece. Its kinda hard to miss when Fox says, daily, "We are nothing but the Bush administrations propaganda machine."
      But it's hard to get out real news when you have to compete for ratings with the televised conservative version of the National Enquirer.

    18. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by MrHyd3 · · Score: 0

      CNN is called the Clinton News Network because it's LEFT winged, far from a US mouthpiece. I wish all these little "I know what the world needs" college punks who don't know what life is about yet because my mommy and daddy are still paying for my school would just shut up. It's hipocracy at it's worst when they think they have the answers for the world and they can't even balance a checkbook or know who our 1st or 30th President was.

      --
      -------- Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. --Ozzy
    19. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      ROFLOL! I dare you to walk in to a bar in a small town in say Kansas State and shout out loud, "I'm gay and I'm proud!".

      There is a difference here.

      Being beat up by your fellow citizens is not the same as being beat up by your government.

      Freedom of speech also means having to deal with the consequences of your speech. Just because the government allows it doesn't mean you can get away with anything you like.

      Remember the government in China shoots people in the headsends the bill for the bullet to the family. ---Suddenly getting beat up by bubba redneck doesn't seem so bad now, does it?

    20. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by wing03 · · Score: 1

      You are *not* free to say whatever you want, and not expect bodily harm.

      In the United States you are.


      So the right to free speach advocates.

      However, if you're among a group of people who think one way while you another, you will be treated unfairly. Whether it is a beating, discrimination or exclusion. It can be quite difficult to prove but it's there nonetheless.

      Just look back on the last year and the anti-war/anti GWB voices.

    21. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by the+argonaut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you need to stop getting your history from your much-celebrated "U.S. media". The sixties space race was just as much a piece of nationalist propaganda as China's space program is today. It was as much about discrediting communism as it was anything else. The first satellite, the first astronaut were all serious embarrasments for the "leader of the free world", and the last thing the U.S. government was going to do at that point was let the Soviets beat them again.

      Continuing, I don't know how you can say that the U.S. has the most diverse media in the world. You're extrapolating from the fact that yes, there are a large number of media sources ultimately available, but the fact remains that the majority of the news reoprted here comes from a very small number of large media corporations, whose loyalty to actually reporting the news is very questionable (i.e., Disney/ABC, General Electric/NBC, Westinghouse/CBS, The "vast right-wing conspiracy"/Fox, Time Warner/CNN). The existence of all those other media sources is irrelevant, as they realistically constitute a very small portion of the media spectrum, and not the portion that influences public opinion. Compare this to Europe, where a the media is more evenly divided between a greater number of news agencies, who arguably represent a larger spectrum of views, given the European tendency for individual media outlets to be far more ideological. Of course, when you compare the U.S. to the rest of the world, you're probably just thinking about Russia or Cuba...

      Get off your high horse. The U.S. has a number of good things going for it, but your posting is way too in the vain of "America uber alles" nationalism to be taken seriously. If you're afraid to seriously critique and recognize the flaws in your own country, then you're also unreliable as a source of praise.

      --
      fuck you.
    22. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yep. He deserved it. All perverts must DIE!

      BTW, it was Wyoming, not Texas. Texans drag people to death and/or leave them to die in the desert.

    23. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      The US is fine as long as you're white, xtian, straight and male. I wonder how long a gay pagan goth would survive in much of the country. As a nation th US is paranoid, isolationist and egotistical.

      I suppose you'd know being from the UK. Well, we are one of the most diverse countries in the world. We have very open immigration policies and are much more foreigner-friendly compared to Germany (guest workers treated like shit) or Japan.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    24. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      I live in Quebec (Canada). I watch on TV my local news, CNN and news from France (and sometimes news from Belgium and Switzerland too). I also read Le Monde, Aljazeera and The Pravda websites (and when there is important news also ABC news and the BBC).

      I agree there's a lot of different publications in the US but no one read them. What is important is mainstream media. And I'm sorry to say this but US mainstream media suck big time. As they don't want to upset their viewer/reader they clearly hide and manipulate informations.

      During the war in Irak I read a lot of news from a lot of sources and the poor quality of US news was appalling. Censorship and manipulation was so obvious it was laughable. It was about the same level as The Pravda. Now I watch US news not because I want to be informed about what is really happening but because I want to know what the average American hear.

      You say there are more opinions in the US than anywhere in the world... that's so much bullshit. Look for example at France's last election. The range of political opinions was from communism (about 10%) to fascism (about 20%). You will never see so much diversity in the US.

      American culture is not about diversity and freedom of thought. It's about thinking the right way or being un-american. That's the strenght of America.

    25. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by algoa456 · · Score: 1

      In 5,000 years the best they have been able to do is invent gunpowder that they used for fireworks. I am glad you are pleased re the Chinese launch, but clearly you don't work with the arrogant bastards who think everything from China is great even though they don't live there any more. It would have been more impressive if they had not bought everything from the Russians and then copied it. Do you see a pattern there somewhere?

    26. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by algoa456 · · Score: 1

      or China where they want you only to take your knowledge and then throw you out..... I am not living in the US, but surely the point about the US is that it is open - everyone sees its successes and failures. Believe me if the Chinese space shot had failed you'd hear very little about it. Also nobody seems to mention that essentially this was a copy of Russian technology - same old same old copying

    27. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by algoa456 · · Score: 1

      Oh get real...... one incident out of 300 (or so) million people doesn't imply a whole country is that way inclined. Problem with modern youth is that they are so badly educated (especially in the UK) except at hacking code that they simply have no perspective on the broad stats of what they are pronouncing on. I write from the UK

    28. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The US is fine for just about anyone. Hell, in this country you can live with just about any disorder, affliction, or lifestyle choice you want and find a place to "fit in". Its not a true statement elsewhere.

      Bullshit, you pig-ignorant american.

    29. Re:That's because CNN is a US Govt mouthpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US news is not diverse ----
      just compare to British news ----and you will
      see a world of difference

  180. Re:China DOES have a long history of Exploration.. by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the fact that the chinese have had rockets for CENTURIES.

  181. Moon in my lifetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im 26, People hasnt been on the moon in my lifetime.

    I would realy realy like to see (anyone) going there, GO CHINA GO! =)

  182. Big Prestige Boost by hengist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My wife is Chinese, and she is very excited about and proud of this launch. Don't underestimate how much this event will boost their national pride.

  183. No fair! by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    China has an economic advantage when it comes to putting people in space: their people are smaller.

  184. Re:And the liberal slashbots are ecstatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Who is killing innocent people, while losing their own soldiers in a bogus imperial quest of empire building and oil addiction?

    The Arab nations.

  185. Capture the flag! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is great to see. Hopefully China will land on the moon soon, replace the US flags, and annoy the NASA enough to start the world's biggest game of capture the flag!

  186. Re:Nice, but...Atomic Boom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EE's have never studied advanced nuclear physics. So you could say the EE's from 60 years ago also wouldn't understand them.

    IF you mean nuclear engineers or nuclear physicists not being able to understand the technology because its "too old", then you're on crack.

  187. Re:QUOTE.... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

    How could there have been that kind of rhetoric when the USSR launched sputnik? That was fourty years ago, and, ummm, the whole thrust of the 'rhetoric' you quoted is with regard to said fourty years.

    --
    A Good Intro to NetBS
  188. Its hard to have a space race... by cbdavis · · Score: 1

    when we are going to spend 80-100 billion in
    Iraq. Add to that anyother country that we
    go for. Also, we do not have the same fear that
    we had in the 60s over Russian space victories.
    We were truely scared and it drove us to want to
    not only be in space, but be there first.

    Lets face it, we do not have the same drive for
    another space race. We are too mired in worrying
    about terrorism, rebuilding bombed-out countries,
    creating a working missle-defense system, stupid shuttle missions that are pointless, building more nuclear carriers, and erections and hair loss.

    The 60s space race had this country working for a common goal ( while the Vietnam war was tearing us apart). I dont see us working for a common goal anymore.

  189. Jealously never won a space race by theolein · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wrote in the article yesterday on the amazing amount racist xenophobia posted here whenever some other nation achieves something new in a scientific or technological field.

    I am simply flabbergasted. Instead of congratulating the Chinese for a well planned, robust and cheap human space effort, which it is, there are literaly hundreds of hateful, ignorant, racist posts filled to the brim with spite and jealously. And I think it's a real problem with a lot of Americans because it happens so consistently. You want to know why so much of the world has a poor opinion of the USA? Read slashdot, where the supposedly technophile elite make comments based on a lack of knowledge, a sense of low self esteem and jealousy.

    In my opinion, if there is anything that will be the undoing of the USA, it is those attitudes, because jealousy never won a space race. There's an old saying that basing one's actions on jealousy or envy is a guarantee of failure.

    You want my real opinion? No, you don't but here it is anyway.

    The China of today is, if anything, a fascist market state. The ignorance displayed here on Chinese (well, on any non US) poiltics is symbolic of a nation stearing blindly to its own future. The nominally Communist party has very little in common with collectivisation or any other tenets of Marx or Mao's preachings.

    The Chinese have achieved a human launch in space with a well paced programme that has taken it's time and not rushed things, which is why this has gone so smoothly. It has done this with a budget that is less than 1/7th of NASA's. And before you start yet another round of 30 year old technology trolling, may I point out to you that the computing power in the Chinese rocketry is at least 20 years newer than that in the Space Shuttle.

    NASA would be well advised to take a lesson from the simplicity and pacing of the Chinese programme.

    1. Re:Jealously never won a space race by Izeickl · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Well said.

    2. Re:Jealously never won a space race by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      Instead of congratulating the Chinese for a well planned, robust and cheap human space effort, which it is, there are literaly hundreds of hateful, ignorant, racist posts filled to the brim with spite and jealously

      Actually, I've seen mostly congratulatory post, but I'm reading at +3. Anyway, yeah, there are redneck idiots here. They exist everywhere in the world, not just the US South or Slashdot. Hatred of idiots is actually something that could bring different nationalities together. Stupid people exist in all cultures and should be laughed at by all.

      because jealousy never won a space race.

      no, hard work and sound scientific knowledge won it about 30 years ago.

      The ignorance displayed here on Chinese (well, on any non US) poiltics is symbolic of a nation stearing blindly to its own future.

      Hell, the ignorance displayed here on US politics is symbolic of a nation stearing blindly to its own future. What's your point? Are you saying that we shouldn't take a small sample and project a stereotype over a large group of people? Like, say, I don't know, looking at a few posts on a website and saying Americans are stupid infidels who make fun of outsiders?

      The Chinese have achieved a human launch in space with a well paced programme that has taken it's time and not rushed things

      How do you know? How does anyone outside of China have any idea how long it took or what safety measures they have taken? I mean yeah, they have plenty of data from the US and USSR to help them along, but I'd bet anything that *if* they had screwed up something NOONE would ever hear about it.

      Chinese rocketry is at least 20 years newer than that in the Space Shuttle.

      One would hope, since the Space Shuttle was built with technology from the 70's.

      NASA would be well advised to take a lesson from the simplicity and pacing of the Chinese programme

      And you think they aren't?

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    3. Re:Jealously never won a space race by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Instead of congratulating the Chinese for a well planned, robust and cheap human space effort, which it is, there are literaly hundreds of hateful, ignorant, racist posts filled to the brim with spite and jealously.

      Maybe you need to stop browsing at -1. I've been reading +2 and haven't seen more than one or two posts that could be considered even mildly hateful or ignorant.

      Just saying.

    4. Re:Jealously never won a space race by repressitol · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but I'm simply flabbergasted that you didn't bother to read the article:
      Another view, expressed before the launch, comes from The Times of India, which in an editorial Monday called the Shenzhou 5 launch a "joke." "It would be better to call it China's Late Creep Forward, given that Beijing is attempting to showcase a four-decade-old technology. If this is China's idea of arriving, then it's come at a time when the other two spacefaring nations have left it light years behind," the publication said.

      Can you read? Did you see the "Times of India" quote? Did you see what they said? Perhaps I missed something and India is now another continent of the USA?

      I happened to read a lot of good posts on this article; as others have said, perhaps it's the level you viewed them at. I certainly agree that "jealousy has no place", but do you really have to cheapen your point with a weak generalization?

      Oh -- I realize it's terribly fashionable and clever for the "superior-attitude" nations to bash Americans on this site. After all, they're so incredibly clever at positively everything and all of us here are have no clue, right? I'm not going to waste time apologizing for our behavior, any more than you will for yours. Keep in mind the roots of the majority population in this country started from nations around the world. Any time you take ridiculous comments and lump an entire nation into one category, you're basically guilty of the issues that are at the root of your complaint.

      Hey, I lived in the UK for half my life, does that mean I view the English as a bunch of football hooligans who export violence to Germany? Hardly.

      The incredible lack of understanding in you're own commentary is present in all societies. It is especially prevalent where ignorant blanket generalizations form in the small minds of individuals such as yourself.

    5. Re:Jealously never won a space race by dvk · · Score: 1
      The Chinese have achieved a human launch in space with a well paced programme that has taken it's time and not rushed things, which is why this has gone so smoothly.

      No argument about taking their time leading to smooth performance. Duh! However, you SHOULD know that they are the only nation of the 3 currenyly posessing human-piloted spacecraft who COULD afford to take their time; USSR and USA both were in a race against each other. China is not in a race, and in no immediate danger.

      It has done this with a budget that is less than 1/7th of NASA's.

      I have to call bullshit here. Some of the multiple reasons for smaller budget are:

      • Different cost of living. I'm sure salaries paid to China's engineers are lots smaller than NASA ones.
      • Different economy. Last I checked, NASA could not enjoy the cheap labor costs provided by prisoners in labor camps the way PLA can. Or designate as many people/resources as it needed for the task at hand as was needed at the moment.
      • Diferent political system. When Premiere says "JUMP", entire country asks "How High?". Unlike our current "I will oppose the current president to the death, especially if it's a death of another 3000 peons" congress, whose members place a LOT higher value on their ideology and/or their electability as opposed to the good of their country or countrymen.
      • Different scope of the program. Besides the money black hole (aka Shuttle), NASA also runs a whole slew of uther things, that Chinese do not.
      • Chinese didn't have to invent the thing from scartch. Rocket program are based on Soviet technology. Ship is based on Soyuz. 'nuff said.

      And before you start yet another round of 30 year old technology trolling, may I point out to you that the computing power in the Chinese rocketry is at least 20 years newer than that in the Space Shuttle.

      Question is, does that computing power lead to better performance/less bugs etc... After they've flown 100 lunches, you can compare notes and decide whose program performed better. I will retain judgements till then.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
  190. Just goes to show... by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

    No one can fuck w/China. The MAD clause applies to them as well as to any nuke-enabled country. Now they are spacebound too. The pinnacle of science has obviously been reached by the Chinese too. Better watch out for them.

    --
    'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
  191. Gunpowder, rockets, the compass by hughk · · Score: 1

    Ok, the chinese are credited with gunpowder and rockets as well as the magnetic compass and a lot of early work on navigation. China wasn't so interested in colonies though, more in trading posts, which have a tendancy to be more transient. Their neighbours, in Mongolia (relevant, they ran China for a while) were somewhat more 'adventurous' reaching the gates of Vienna - they weren't sea explorers, but that is still a vast space to cover.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:Gunpowder, rockets, the compass by HeghmoH · · Score: 1
      As Mao once said:

      We are much better than the Europeans, as they always misuse technology. We invented gunpowder, but we were smart enough to not make guns. We invented the printing press, but we were smart enough to not publish newspapers. We invented the compass, but we were smart enough to not discover America.
      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  192. Response to Russian technology claims by theolein · · Score: 4, Informative

    There have been many posts here about the Chinese basing their capsule design on the Russian Soyuz design from the 60's and how this supposedly makes the Chinese effort worthless. Think about this.

    The whole entire complete US space programme was based on German technology and ideas from WWII taken from Germany and transplanted into the US along with the German rocket team people under Werner von Braun. Even the idea of a space plane was based on a German WWII idea called the "Saenger Amerikabomber" which was an idea to develop a manned spcae plane that would be able to reach the continental United States and drop a bomb before completing one sub orbit by skippping off the atmosphere and then returning to Germany.

    1. Re:Response to Russian technology claims by Moskit · · Score: 1
      The whole entire complete US space programme was based on German technology

      Not quite true. US acquired the rocket technology, but not capsules. Please read a book by Chris Kraft "Flight", it explains why Mercury was NOT a German program and why Werner von Braun was not that interested in designing the capsule.

    2. Re:Response to Russian technology claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese actually came before that German attempt, where about 200-300 years ago some guy basically sat on a giant firework, trying to fly into space. He, of course, died instantly. But he really was the first astronaut/taikonaut/cosmonaut/etc.

    3. Re:Response to Russian technology claims by pmz · · Score: 1

      The whole entire complete US space programme was based on German technology and ideas from WWII taken from Germany and transplanted into the US along with the German rocket team people under Werner von Braun.

      AAARRRRGGHHHHH!!!! My eyes! The knowledge of history is burning out my eyes! (just kidding)

      German defections were actually a pretty important part of Germany not winning WWII. German engineering in the late 1930's and early 1940's was scary (they almost had nuclear bombs, first, too, IIRC!).

  193. They sent the wrong guy! by Gerv · · Score: 1

    Xinhua said the craft carried astronaut Yang Liwei, 38.

    I'm surprised they didn't send his brother - Mil Kiwei.

    Gerv

  194. I was at the Komarov school by G�tz · · Score: 1

    Hey, Komarov was a hero. I was born in East Germany, my school was named after Vladimir Komarov. But soon after the German reunification, it was renamed to 'Heinrich-Schliemann-Gymnasium' for both political and historical reasons, as Schliemann, went to school there.

  195. Re:FUCK YOU TIMOTHY by Penguinshit · · Score: 0, Troll

    What the fuck is "\."; the Microsoft version of "/."?

  196. welcome to 1960 by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    Maybe this somehow is the first steps to getting rid of their Communism. Russia dropped it less than 40 years after going to space. I have no idea why this relates, I'm drunk. :)

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  197. go to hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you godless chink.

  198. and... by GreenKiwi · · Score: 1

    ... and people thought that the US moon mission was just a Hollywood stunt.

  199. Develop cheap nanotech for cheap space access by thenarftwit · · Score: 1

    This time, so as to stay in space for the long haul, we need to push nanotech research so as to develop cheap methods of getting and living in space (like the space elevator and cheaper launch vehicles). We will also need nanotech repair nanobots so we can live in the high-radiation eviroment of space and of course, the health advantages of nanotech to reverse things like muscle wating in zero G etc. Growing space stations and bases on the moon would be needed, plus the super AI automation needed to build/run/maintain all these space life support systems. We will probablly need all this technology here on earth soon, as we are polluting ourselves out of exisitence here and our present econimic systems here on earth cannot evolve fast enough and are incapable of adapting to including the natural world as part of the equation. The only way we can survive as a half-decent world is to restore most of the earths biospere (for example, I read on the bbc web site, that the world's oceans are getting more acidic due to C02 pollution, that's a really bad sign). Developing non-polluting nanotech industries, most improtant, we need to eliminate materialism (as a cultural icon and goal) through nanotech produced/recycled items (since all objets would be described as a cad file to be replicated) is a good start.

  200. I've heard this somewhere before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ford Prefect was extremely grateful, as he strapped himself in, that this was just another Informational Illusion, and that he was therefore completely safe. In real life it wasn't a ship he would have set foot in for all the rice wine in China. "Extremely rickety" was one phrase which sprang to mind, and "Please may I get out?" was another.

    In front of them and, of course, totally unaware of their presence for the very good reason that they weren't actually there, were the three pilots. They had also constructed the ship. They had been on the hill path that night singing wholesome heartwarming songs. Their brains had been very slightly turned by the nearby crash of the alien spaceship. They had spent weeks stripping every tiniest last secret out of the wreckage of that burnt-up spaceship, all the while singing lilting spaceship- stripping ditties. They had then built their own ship and this was it. This was their ship, and they were currently singing a little song about that too, expressing the twin joys of achievement and ownership. The chorus was a little poignant, and told of their sorrow that their work had kept them such long hours in the garage, away from the company of their wives and children, who had missed them terribly but had kept them cheerful by bringing them continual stories of how nicely the puppy was growing up.

    Pow, they took off.

    They roared into the sky like a ship that knew precisely what it was doing.

    "No way," said Ford a while later after they had recovered from the shock of acceleration, and were climbing up out of the planet's atmosphere, "no way," he repeated, "does anyone design and build a ship like this in a year, no matter how motivated. I don't believe it. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it." He shook his head thoughtfully and gazed out of a tiny port at the nothingness outside it.

  201. Fido-to-go. by Channard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Fucking clueless idiots - our pets are their tortured food. If anyone did that to my dog, I would torture them and feed their carcass to a large dog.

    Because, of course, dogs being cute and fluffy and cows not being cute and fluffy puts them in a completely different league. Unless you're a vegetarian, it's pretty hypocritical to complain about people eating cats and dogs while regularly shoving cow parts down your jaded throat. Just because we've deigned a certain animal as a pet, it doesn't magically transcend to some level above cows and pigs. Meat is meat.

    1. Re:Fido-to-go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dogs are intelligent. Pigs are intelligent. Chimps are intelligent. Humans are intelligent (okay, GWB is an exception). Cows, buffalo, chicks, ducks, and turkey are stupid animals.

      I wouldn't eat dogs, pigs, or chimps for the same reason.

    2. Re:Fido-to-go. by homerules · · Score: 1

      but pork fat rules!

    3. Re:Fido-to-go. by alexdewaal · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a nice definition of intelligence. Great criterion too, for deciding what to eat.

      IIRC, the native Americans didn't eat turkeys because they were stupid animals.

      I like vegetarians, that is, on a plate.

    4. Re:Fido-to-go. by gi-tux · · Score: 1

      Surely you remember the line by Sherman Potter (Harry Morgan in real life) from M*A*S*H. I don't remember it exactly, but essentially it was that cows are a homely creature and we are doing them a favor by eating them. He was referring to the Korean people eating horse meat which caused problems with using American vaccines that were developed in horses.

      Culture is a wonderful thing, but it sure does cause some weird things in life.

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    5. Re:Fido-to-go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the native Americans didn't eat turkeys because they were stupid animals.

      In other words: you are what you eat dumbass.

      nice one. :)

    6. Re:Fido-to-go. by wing03 · · Score: 1

      Cows, buffalo, chicks, ducks, and turkey are stupid animals.
      Cows - Ever worked on a beef ranch? They are intelligent and are looking for weaknesses in the fences that contain them and work together at breaking through.

      Chickens & ducks - Lump them into the same category as parrots/parakeets and other intelligent avian pets. They will recognize you the same as any higher intelligence pet birds.

      Pigs - People keep pot bellied pigs as pets.

      turkey - Not much I can say here that the cultivated ones will stare up into the sky when it rains, beaks wide open wondering what's going on and eventually drown.

      What's food in one part of the world isn't food in another part. Try ordering steak in India or even finding someone to slaughter a cow.

      Get over yourself.

    7. Re:Fido-to-go. by William+Baric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last winter (I live in Canada), I found a sick pigeon in my backyard. It was unable to fly so I decided to put it in a box in my home. I was thinking it will probably die in a few hours so why not let it die peacefully in a warm environment.

      The pigeon didn't die and I kept it for about three months (until it was strong enough to fly). During these three months I "studied" it and I realized it was far more intelligent than I ever thought. After I released it, I continued to put some food in my backyard and pay more attention to these birds. I now know these birds are really intelligent and each one has it's own "personality".

      I don't know about cows, buffalo or other animals as I never studied them but I guess you don't have any clue either. In fact by your comments about pigs I guess you're a muslim trying hard to justify the rules imposed by your culture and your religion. I'm sorry but if you believe something simply because everyone else around you does, then you are stupid.

    8. Re:Fido-to-go. by RedCard · · Score: 1

      I don't know about cows, buffalo or other animals as I never studied them but I guess you don't have any clue either. In fact by your comments about pigs I guess you're a muslim trying hard to justify the rules imposed by your culture and your religion. I'm sorry but if you believe something simply because everyone else around you does, then you are stupid.

      I'd like to point out that the poster could also be jewish.
      Why are you picking on the muslims and not the jews?

      What does this suggest about your own perceptions?

    9. Re:Fido-to-go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. In addition, the poster could also be christian, who is actually following what their bible says about eating pork. You know, who decided what orders are to be followed and what are not? Why christians eat pigs? If you can discard something that is clearly commanded to you in a document supposedly from your god, then what value is your religion anymore? At least jews and muslims do what their books say and don't be such incredibly hypocritical.

    10. Re:Fido-to-go. by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Why are you picking on the muslims and not the jews?

      Because I forgot about the fact that jews don't eat pork either. Because I know several muslims who don't eat pork and this cause problems when we order a pizza. Because I already had this kind of arguments with muslims before but never with a jew. Because I don't believe for one second that the reason the poster don't eat pork is only because he thinks pigs are intelligent. It's an excuse. (ok I agree it may be because he had a pet pig but the chances are slim)

      What does this suggest about my own perceptions? Well I guess it suggest I think about people I know and who are close to me first. Sorry next time I'll try to be fair and pick on everybody ;-)

    11. Re:Fido-to-go. by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Yeah, christian are hypocritical... that's why every muslims I know drink alcohol! (sorry, but you asked for it)

      BTW before this turn to a religious crusade, I'm an atheist who never drink alcohol :-)

    12. Re:Fido-to-go. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Wild birds are definatly intelligent. We feed quite a few in the front yard regularly. They're intelligent enough to tap on the window when the food runs low.

    13. Re:Fido-to-go. by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0

      If God didn't want us to eat animals, why'd he make them out of meat? You God damn hairy tree hugging vegan-Nazi.

    14. Re:Fido-to-go. by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0

      Damn we got so many yamulke wearers in my office, and our office provides breakfast including pork sausage and bacon. And those dirtbags eat more of that than anyone! Ah well at least they'll be in hell.

    15. Re:Fido-to-go. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      "Unless you're a vegetarian" should be changed to "unless you eat only vegetables that are hand grown", because mechanized growing of crops kills millions of field rats each year. Better watch out for the bacteria on the vegetables too, wouldn't want to kill it or even worse, hurt its feelings.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    16. Re:Fido-to-go. by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between collateral death and purposeful death. There is flawed logic at work here, it should be painfully obvious. Just because something dies from the GATHERING of food, does not mean you can make the jump to "it's now ok to bash a cow on the head and feast on the goo inside, since something has to die anyhow." Eat what you will, but don't purport to tell anyone else what to do.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    17. Re:Fido-to-go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just fwiw: i live in china and yesterday heard a first-hand story about a local custom of killing dogs for meat by putting them into a sack hung from the ceiling before (slowly) battering them to death with a stick or a hammer in order to ensure the tenderness of the meat. my friend's girlfriend, a cosmopolitan chinese girl, heard desperate animal squeals at the local waterworks facility only to find a worker there using his tools for such meat preparation purposes... she nearly assaulted the guy and sent him running for *his* life! The poor dog, already turned into a bloody pulp, died several hours later despite their efforts to save his life. there's a reason why i never let my dog out of my sight even for half a minute. ps. ever been to a chinese (or other asian) animal food market? meat is meat indeed, and it will take a long time before humanity will give up the old custom of killing animals for food, but it is totally unnecessary to torture the victims before eating them. pps. i'm equally disgusted by many aspects of modern industrial (western innovation?) meat farming...

    18. Re:Fido-to-go. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Don't purport to tell anyone else what to do? I'm pretending to tell someone else what to do? What does that even mean? Remove "purport to" from your sentence and you begin to make a little sense. A little. Of course I'm gonna tell people what to do. Thats what you were doing with your own post and thats what we as humans do. I'll agree that this guy does a much better job of it than me, but I won't pretend that eating vegetables is somehow less bad than eating cows. If you believe its murder to kill animals where do you draw the line? I draw it at humans. Veggy people may draw it at bacteria but I'm here to (purport to? nope doesn't work in this case either) tell them they are wrong, the line is at humans, except in the case of a plane crash in the mountains or a ship lost at sea, then the line is drawn by drawing straws.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    19. Re:Fido-to-go. by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Do not attack what you do not know. "Don't purport to ..." is a figure of speech. And the definition of purport doesn't contain the word pretend:
      1 - To have or present the often false appearance of being or intending; profess (I will concede here that it does have similarities to pretending but only "often", but onward to definition 2).
      2 - To have the intention of doing; purpose (here we have the "intention of doing" or what you DID do, by telling someone what to eat).

      To continue: You are replacing accident (the combine killing field mice on ACCIDENT) with intent (someone goes and INTENTIONALLY kills a cow so that you can eat (a small part of, I might add) it). Now it is none of my business that you eat animals; preferrably animals would receive the same treatment as humans, I just don't see that happening in my lifetime.

      But don't be a jerk to people who want to minimize the suffering of other life (To quote: "Veggie people may draw [the line] at bacteria", give me a fucking break. Do you realize how uneducated you sound saying that? You are assuming far more than you realize there). It isn't about making every form of life immortal by any means, but you don't have to murder to eat, so then why do it? Because there are predators and they can, so why not you?

      Yeah, well, you must not belive you are much more spiritually/mentally advanced than they are too.

      Also, you cannot say what is right or wrong; how long have you soul-searched? Have you spent time even thinking about what is right or wrong? Or do you just eat meat and think it's right because your parents fed it to you and they must be right? It seems you have not grasped the concept that there may be more out there than just the life you lead, here and now.
      What if YOU'RE wrong and it ISN'T ok to eat animals? Then what? Maybe you will reincarnate as some sort of lower carnivore, to fulfill your gluttonous lifestyle that you so desire...

      Or maybe we're both wrong and we should start eating humans. Why is that so much different than cows? Becaues we have personalities? I'm sure cows do to. Meat is meat, so what arbitrary line have you defined to justify eating cows and not humans? Because it's illegal? Please...

      I draw the line at what is necessary. Beef is nowhere near as healthy or nutritive as soy, weight for weight. It also requires a shit load of resources to feed ONE cow, compared to soy/corn/you name it. And I doubt one cow can feed more than 3-4 people for more than a day or so on it's own (with small rations).

      I never like telling anyone what to do, and you are right, I should not tell you what to do, but the ignorance of your post needed to be addressed. You were incorrect (or perhaps misguided is a better term) in your response and I took offence to it. Only take this as an opportunity to better yourself, I actually hope you will see that it is unnecessary to kill another being to do something as simple as eat. I will feel much better if that is the case than if you just respond in an even more inflamatory manner. Please take the time to read and process what I say, instead of burning through it and finding small flaws and trying to personally attack me on them. I spent a good amount of time presenting myself in a non-inflammatory manner, if you expect my end of the converstion to continue, you should do the same.

      And no, I'm not some unrealistic greenpeace hippie moron, I just respect life and I care more for the well-being of other animals than I do for my convenience. I will not eat animals because some self-deifying fool on Slashdot says it's ok.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    20. Re:Fido-to-go. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Let me know this: does saying something about someone's use of "purport to" sound more like "personally attack[ing]" someone or does calling someone a "self-deifying fool on Slashdot" sound more like a personal attack? How about calling me a glutton? Then, you bring up Slashdot in the post as though thats a bad thing; You're posting on Slashdot too. I like how you make most of these attacks after going on a rant for a paragraph about my making personal attacks. Classic.

      The page I linked to and the guy's previous rant on the same subject sum up my thoughts completely. He defeats soundly every argument you brought up.

      Now, I don't know if Maddox handles the reincarnation argument so I'll have to take it on. Let me do so by presenting another argument. What if you only eat vegetables your whole like and you reincarnate as a giraffe!!! OH NO!!!

      Sounds pretty fucking stupid doesn't it? So did your argument.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    21. Re:Fido-to-go. by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Grow up.
      Truth be told, you are technically a glutton: you eat for recreation rather than to survive, you kill for your pleasure. Not a personal attack but rather a statement of fact.
      Also self-deifying as you are pretty much giving yourself god-like qualities by asserting that your way is the only way. I'm tired of your blatant disregard for any ideas but your own. You probably think you are some sort of superman because you are marginally more intelligent than your peers, well sorry to burst your bubble but you aren't.
      Next, that you are trying to tell people that a solid conscious choice that they have made to better themselves, is wrong via a Public Forum that is more intended for "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters." The only reason I replied is because your comment was unnecessary and offensive.
      If this is so important to you, you should really learn how to write a coherent argument that didn't take you 5 minutes to concoct because you think I'm trying to make fun of you.
      Maddox did not sum it up perfectly because there are BILLIONS of people who think the exact opposite way as you and him. One guy's website on why he thinks eating meat is a great idea means absolutely nothing to me plus a hell of a lot of other people. His arguments only defeat mine when you disregard any sort of higher-consciousness, which is outright retarded.
      And yes, your example did sound "pretty fucking stupid", because you don't quite grasp the process of reincarnation. It's not just some random number generator in the sky.
      All in all, you are hopeless, have a good day and do not anticipate a response from me unless you stop touting your "Maddox said" this and "Veggie people do" that.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  202. Saturn V was Werner von Braun's? by GusCubed · · Score: 1

    Am I completely wrong, or was Saturn V not designed by Werner von Braun?

    He was a teensy-weensy bit nazi nein?

    --
    =#= Man, you are such a loser! Why can't you be an individual, like the rest of us?
  203. new launch site allready planned by LuckyStarr · · Score: 1

    somewhere nearer the aequator. browse at space.com for more information.

    --
    Meme of the day: I browse "Disable Sigs: Checked". So should you.
  204. Sightings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heavens Above has rough sighting times. They may be out by a few minutes.
    http://www.heavens-above.com/

  205. Re:FUCK YOU TIMOTHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck is "\."; the Microsoft version of "/."?

    It's a fuckin' typo, you anal-retentive loser. How do you survive the real world as tightly wrapped as you are?

  206. Maybe so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But none of them beat

    "Russians send Lance Bass into space..

    ..capsule burns up on re-entry."

    1. Re:Maybe so by CowboyMeal · · Score: 1

      You forget what country you're talking about.

      Don't you mean Lance Bass sends you?

      --
      Your credit card information wants to be free.
  207. Re:Yeah, I get the Internet too by thre5her · · Score: 1

    Have you seen FOX News lately? Or at all? Not to mention MSNBC. CNN may be right-wing, but it's left of those piss-holes.

  208. "The fear was palpable" by nagora · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Just in case anyone's getting too excited about China entering the modern world, it's worth reading this BBC article about life as a conquered nation under the Chinese government.

    One guy up in a rocket? Big fucking deal.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  209. Australia by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    IIRC Indonesian maps used to show Australia as "greater Irian", i.e. part of Indonesia.

  210. Except they're not pets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're livestock. These are dogs raised for consumption. The incidences of torture have dramatically decreased.

    As an aside, plenty of Koreans have dogs as pets, and are just as retarded as North Americans about them ie. spending hundreds of dollars on stupid dog outfits, and carrying them around as if they were an "ittle wittle baby".

  211. Notice the clean blue flame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone have a clue why this rocket has such a clean-looking flame, like a torch welder, and very much unlike the fireballs trailing for instance the space shuttle?

    1. Re:Notice the clean blue flame? by Brahmastra · · Score: 1

      Maybe it doesn't have any solid fuel engines and has just liquid fueled engines?

  212. Re:Nice, but...Atomic Boom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Recipe for an atomic bomb:

    • Take two halves of a speherical critical mass of HE U235.
    • Place each half at the end of a tube, with the flat surface of each half facing the other.
    • You may wish to consider adding a small high nuetron source to ensure a chain reaction. The decision should depend on the actual mass of U235, its enrichment, and the availability of a neutron source.
    • Place a small package of high explosives behind the rounded surface of one half of the critical mass. Be sure to include a firing mechanism which is suitable for use with your chosen high explosive.
    • Encase the assembly in a second assembly, just to keep it all neat.

    When you want to blow something up, just ignite the charge and stand back!

    Of course the problem isn't actually building one (And you'd get what equates to a modern day nuclear pop-gun), its getting hold of highly enriched Uranium 235 and casting it into two sub critical masses. Thats extremly hard, and only six countries have managed it in over 60 years.

    If you want to build more than a nuclear pop-gun you're also going off into realms only explored by four countries (Three and a half really; China got any thermo nuclear technology it has from the USSR, after all)
  213. Visible in a few minutes by jmichaelg · · Score: 3, Informative

    At 5:58 EDT, Shenzhou 5 will be visible over Boston
    At 11:28 GMT, it'll be visible over Chicago.
    Last chance at 5:59 PDT to see it over the West Coast.

    Orbit details at space weather.

    1. Re:Visible in a few minutes by zavyman · · Score: 1

      I just saw it; it wasn't that bright, but was still very cool.

      I caught the third pass, the one north of the San Francisco Bay Area.

    2. Re:Visible in a few minutes by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Ah, finally someone provides an answer! Just had my ass flamed off, because early after the launch, I asked why nobody has provided proof that the launch took place. Sheesh folks, instead of starting a flamewar for a legitimate question, just say "It's overhead right now, dumbass" and leave it at that.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  214. Please drop that abhorrent term. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Any person that goes into space is properly called astronaut in English.

    Cosmonaut and the even more hideous term used in this article are concoctions of people that tried to be too clever and that had (or have) a political agenda that in nothing contributes to describe the facts.

    For a clue, you should always check media that is not always stupid, like the BBC who are calling this person an astronaut as he should be called.

    For a better explanation check Wikipedia.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Please drop that abhorrent term. by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
      What is the Engrish word for Astronaut?

      Side note: I expect to see Muppets in Space now. Oh wait.. they already did that ;)

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  215. Reading the manual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I note on the BBC version of the story the paragraph:

    Once aloft, he was said to be "reading a flight manual in the capsule of the Shenzhou V spacecraft and looked composed and at ease"


    Shouldn't he have read it before lift off?
  216. Re:Yeah, I get the Internet too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, to Islamic and Communist countries .. CNN is Left Wing. And to Europe, CNN is Right Wing. Maybe CNN is just well balanced.

  217. Insane Nazi weapons by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    a German WWII idea called the "Saenger Amerikabomber" which was an idea to develop a manned spcae plane that would be able to reach the continental United States and drop a bomb before completing one sub orbit by skippping off the atmosphere and then returning to Germany.

    Wow. That's even loonier than most of the really loony Nazi experimental weapons programs (at least if done using WW2 tech). I imagine it never left the "drawn on napkin" concept stage, thank god. Eventually, we're going to find out they were planning to build a cyber-Hitler with gatling guns for arms, aren't we...

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:Insane Nazi weapons by theolein · · Score: 1

      Here is a link to an info page on the Saenger design, with many more other strange concepts in the parent pages. take a look, it's fascinating.

  218. Re:And the liberal slashbots are ecstatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err.. no, I believe it is the US forces who are busy killing innocents.

    The arabs are killing illegal occupiers..

    Welcome to Vietnam 2, USA!

  219. Sea Launch by rwa2 · · Score: 1
    Hughes (now owned by Boeing) does this to launch commercial satellites. Sea Launch is a sea-going launch platform that ferries the rocket out to the equator in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.

    In fact, Hughes / Boeing got into big trouble with the State Department for "exporting" too much technical information to the Chinese the last time they helped them launch a satellite using Sea Launch. Imagine that...

  220. Re:Jealously never won a space race (partly OT) by Caid+Raspa · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If the Chinese use 1/7th of NASA:s budget, I think it is expensive. I haven't heard of any big Chinese Space achievements before this. (They have their military satellites, but so has the USA, and no-one knows exactly of these.) NASA has Science missions like Hubble and Chandra. Deep Space Network to operate planetary probes like Cassini and the Mars missions. GPS. Manned spaceflight program was operating several space shuttles and building the space station. And of course past missions to be proud of (Apollo, Viking, Pioneer, Voyager, Skylab, and so on and so forth.)

    The China of today is, if anything, a fascist market state. The ignorance displayed here on Chinese (well, on any non US) poiltics is symbolic of a nation stearing blindly to its own future. The nominally Communist party has very little in common with collectivisation or any other tenets of Marx or Mao's preachings.

    Sorry for going off-topic. Honestly speaking, I see very little difference between practical applications of Fascism (3rd Reich, Mussolini's Italy) and Communism (Soviet Union, China). The rhetoric is different, but the practical effects are similar: a totalitarian state. Minorities (Jews or Tibetans or whatever) are persecuted, no criticism of the government is allowed, censorship and corruption are part of everyday life, military has a very important role in politics, ... the rant goes on and on.

    A political decision ("put more money in a space program") is made in an entirely different environment in the USA. When the small, monolithic elite decides something in China, everyone has to shut up, expect when they are told to cheer. In USA, congress, elections, mass media and all the NGO:s influence the politics. Threefolding the Space Program spending for a decade is so much easier when you have no checks or balances.

  221. CNN Wasn't Quite That Bad by Nit+Picker · · Score: 1

    I too channel surfed between several news channels looking for pictures, and I don't know if or when CNN Headline News finally said something about it, but at 10:00pm (ET) Aaron Brown on CNN had the launch as the lead story.

  222. Did anybody take the time to remember ....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That the Chinese are still Communist? I'm sorry, but this is not a flame. There are still THOUSANDS of political prisoners in China who are locked away in prison cells, away from their families, forced to do labor (much like the Nazis did the Jews), and many for the simple act of saying "the government sucks", a statement made by many Slashdotters everyday.

    So excuse me if I don't join you all in congratulating the Chinese. Saluting the Chinese going into space is like saluting Hitler for creating the V2.

  223. Re:How will the US react in the short-term? by Onan+The+Librarian · · Score: 1

    Given the Bush administration's avowed policy of thwarting any other nation's attempt at building a comparable military technology (viz the rancor directed at North Korea and Iran, both of which have nuclear capability) I'm wondering how the US military perceives this rather impressive tech advance from China.

    Btw, there's probably little hope left for the US reviving the space program as long as Bush is in office. He and his friends are making far too much money from cost overruns in Iraq. When the administration can ask for $90 billion (US) to "rebuild" Iraq, it seems evident to me that there's less than 0 interest in such a program. Science, education, and social programs are things of the past, as far as the Bush administration is concerned.

    A few weeks ago I watched "Apollo 13" again. Considering the history presented in that movie I had to wonder if the US would ever know such days again in my own lifetime. Sadly, I doubt it.

    This is my opinion. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

  224. At least some country remembers space by I-R-Baboon · · Score: 1

    Maybe this giant chopstick circling the planet will remind NASA they are not special, and they need to get off their high horses and start actually DOING something aside from murdering astronauts. (Gee LeeRoy, that tanker full of gas leaving the processing plant just hit somethin and sprung a leak...reckon we shouldin do somethin? Naw, then weez might look stupid lets let it just blow up and burn away so in nobody notices.)

    Props to China, I hope many more great successes come their way so the twits at NASA are cleaned up and fresh smart blood can be brought in to actually do something. Who knows, someday in our lifetimes we may all end up as just earthlings and not capitalists or socialists nor muslim or christian or other brainwashed labels. Just PIGS IN SPACE!

    --
    -1 Overrated (Too many big words for me to comprehend)
  225. Re:China DOES have a long history of Exploration.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those were just left over from this

  226. Wallaps Island, VA (but no orbital launches) by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    don't know why no orbital launches from there.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  227. Re:Nice, but...Atomic Boom by idiot/savant · · Score: 1

    Of course the problem isn't actually building one (And you'd get what equates to a modern day nuclear pop-gun), its getting hold of highly enriched Uranium 235 and casting it into two sub critical masses. Thats extremly hard, and only six countries have managed it in over 60 years.

    You seem to be forgetting India, Pakistan, and South Africa (who got rid of their bombs in the 90's).

    Idiot/Savant

  228. Re:Nice, but...Atomic Boom by MrBlint · · Score: 0

    Personally I would stand well back before igniting the charge.

    --
    That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  229. In RED China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    In RED China...they do what they did in Soviet Russia 45 years ago -- eat people for the main course.

  230. Re:Nice, but...Atomic Boom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You seem to be forgetting India, Pakistan, and South Africa (who got rid of their bombs in the 90's).

    Very true. We've also both forgotten Israel (Who have not declared their capability but are widely believed to have bombs, with some evidence to support that)

    So:

    • US
    • USSR
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • India
    • Pakistan
    • South Africa (Now dis-armed)
    • Israel

    I won't include N. Korea as there is very little evidence of even a bomb program, let alone functioning bombs.
  231. Jealousy did win a space race by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1
    Or at least fear did. The United States only geared up its space program after the USSR launched sputnik.

    The negative reactions in this country to the Chinese launch are in large part because it helps prop up a totalitarian regime that is itself quite xenophobic and draws legitimacy from a nazi-like notion of herrenrasse (master race) and has expansionist ambitions. That is a bad thing.

    But putting that aside, I agree with you that this is a good thing for humanity and god bless the Chinese for this feat. I hope that they crank right along and put a space station in orbit and then a base on the moon, because the US, Europeans, and Russians need a kick in the butt to get moving again. I want to visit Mars someday, and it seems like the only way it's going to happen is with another space race.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  232. Thanks by theolein · · Score: 1

    Thanks for posting a decent non trolling answer. I appreciate it.

    One shouldn't forget that the Chinese space effort isn't soley there for this manned space programme. Indeed, this programme is just a fraction of their launch capabilities. Condsider that this budget also covers military satellites and launches, which are under the aegis and budget of the military in the US, as well as their commercial satellite launching capability and the work they are doing on building satellite launches with solid fueled rockets that would enable them to launch satellites in extremely short order.

    As for the comparisons of Fascism and Communism, and their oppression of people, wel, I think you're patrly right. They certainly do meet at a certain point, but have some significant differences, those mostly relating to economic collectivisation and Communism's theoretical equality of workers worldwide, two things that were radically different in the principles of the Third Reich. China, however, does definitely tend to xenophobic views, that is true.

    1. Re:Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too me the "political spectrum" is a circle. Go too far right into fascism and you'll come around and get into communism.

      Go too far left and you'll come up on the other side in fascism.

  233. Re:Jealously never won a space race (partly OT) by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    if the Chinese use 1/7th of NASA:s budget, I think it is expensive. I haven't heard of any big Chinese Space achievements before this.

    Okay, so they don't have any YET. So think now: The US ALREADY has space shuttles, launch sites, laboratories, test facilities, all that stuff they keep using. Chineese had to build all that starting from scratch.

    Comparison: You have a car and spend $700 a year to keep it running. Meantime I build myself (or buy?) a car and maintain it for a year for $100. And yet you bitch at me saying that my car looks worse than yours and has unfashionable engine, plus I'm from Kentucky and in Kentucky everyone fucks chickens.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  234. NO CHINA! by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    They are not mature enough to have this sort of power. The entire project should have been ordered dismantled by the rest of the world.

    The security of the world just dipped to a new low with this event.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:NO CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

      I think you need to learn a bit of history. The most aggressive and immature country today is USA, and has been so right after they made the nuclear bomb.

      After the war it has not only invaded several countries (even replacing democratically elected governments, just because they didn't like them), but has also used its millitary and economical power to pressure other countries to do what's in US' intrests

  235. "Perhaps this will kick the US space program...?" by mwood · · Score: 1

    I sure hope so. This morning CNN had a survey sidebar asking whether the event would spark a new "cold-war style space race" but I couldn't find a button for "about time, too." Somehow they managed to make it sound like a bad thing.

  236. Rocketing away from economic stagnation by Uncle+Barnard's+Star · · Score: 1
    Aside from its ideological or propaganda value, does the Chinese manned space program make sense? Most critics are likely to point out that the money could be spent more "wisely," ignoring the simple fact that governments aren't households.

    I suspect the Chinese space program has a very utilitarian objective. The leaders of China don't want China to become another Japan, a country whose growth rate was once the envy of the world but is now stumbling from recession to recession. Floundering in a sea of Playstations and Pokemons, Japan has turned into a leisure society.

    Since the middle of the last century there have been two ways a country can jumpstart its economy or, in the case of China, maintain its high growth rate. One is war, or rather, the preparation for war (and its corollary, the recovery from such a fiasco). A dramatic example is the post World War I economic miracle that was Hitler's Germany.

    But this is a route that China, addicted unlike the former Soviet Union to world trade, cannot take. It seems that only the U.S., in its inertial role as the sole surviving superpower of the Cold War era, can undertake a massive military build-up without the threat of a trade embargo being raised.

    So China is left with the only other modern path to continued progress. And that is in the glorious waste of natural resources that is a space program. In the end maybe the only way humanity is going to reach Mars is via some enhanced version of the Long March rockets of Chairman Mao.

    1. Re:Rocketing away from economic stagnation by kcelery · · Score: 1

      They planned to open the first chinese restaurant in orbit to cater astronauts from other countries.

  237. Poor analogy by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    There is a huge difference between building on more rudimentary technology, and "enhancing" technology that already meets the required specifications. Your analogy is like saying that inventing the automobile was easy because horse drawn carriages already existed ("US space programme was based on German technology"), while the better analogy for the Chinese space program would be the creation of a new Car company in the 21st century, when automobile design is extremely well understood and working models can be studied that already meet all the design specifications. There is no comparison.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Poor analogy by theolein · · Score: 1

      The point was that the US programme was based on a working rocket design that had been tested by more than 2000 V2 launches in WWII, as well as the rocket team and all their ideas. The US didn't start from scratch, just as the Chinese didn't. The Chinese launchers are indigenous designs and yet I still can imagine that someone, somewhere, in a pique of bitterness will claim, that the Chinese didn't invent the rocket, when in fact they did, somewhere in the 15th century.

      Does it really matter? Are your feelings of national pride so hurt because others succede where your country hasn't been lately?

    2. Re:Poor analogy by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter? Are your feelings of national pride so hurt because others succede where your country hasn't been lately?

      Does it make you feel better to rebut every idiot on the internet?

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    3. Re:Poor analogy by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      Certainly not. There are at least two very good reasons the rest of the world (ie, not just the US) is not jumping up and down about this:

      1) No new groundbreaking technology is being produced. We see no space plane, no new propulsion system, or anything that wasn't fundamentally engineered almost a half a century ago.

      2) Motive, Motive, Motive.

      If anything this stunt provides indication of just how huge the chasm is between the People and the Communists. People of China get rice and a bicycle, government officials get medal for getting the Motherland in the international news.

      Kuala Lumpur has the tallest skyscraper in the world. Does that National Achievement make it any better to be the average Malaysian, compared to being the average Britain, American or German?

      China has put a man in space. Does that make it any better to be Chinese?

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    4. Re:Poor analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese do feel better after economy reform (the open door policy after 1979),so they put a man in space.

      They do have problem of human rights, and etc,
      but it is changing.

      Chinese government invested billions dollars
      to help Tibet too.

      Chinese didnot bomb Peral Harbour, Japanese did.

      Chinese are talking about to buy a Buick or VW
      , not a bicycle.

      Most old Chinese commies are dead, new leaders are
      engineers, they dont give a damn to those old junks, for some culture related reasons(show respect to seniors),
      they have to agree superfically with old junks.

      Chinese people love peace, Chinese government love money

      Sorry for my broken english.

    5. Re:Poor analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't expect them to go directly from unmanned rockets to space shuttles? Technology takes time, and they need to test it.

  238. A much cheaper way by pablo_max · · Score: 0

    Seems like since there are several billion of them it would be much cheaper to use the good'old piggy back method. stack'em up.

  239. What's wrong with cosmonaut? by Uncle+Barnard's+Star · · Score: 1
    But cosmonaut (after the word "cosmos") is just as accurate a term as astronaut for a space explorer! If we look at the defintion of "astro-" in The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48, astroanut is actually further from the truth: "The combining form of the Greek word 'a`stron, meaning star."

    Now have any English-speaking astronauts actually reached Proxima Centauri? The Russians are more honest in claiming only to be explorers of the cosmos, which could begin at end of your nose.

  240. RE: Perhaps this will kick the US space program? by objwiz · · Score: 1

    "Perhaps this will kick the US space program back into gear?"

    I sure hope so. Our space program has really deteroriated. Being an outsider (not employed in the space industry), I cannot say for certain but this is was it seems to me:

    I feel that NASA has become so afraid of an accident or death that they are almost paralysed from doing anything progressive. Look how long it's going to be before a shuttle goes back up. Not until late 2004. So in the meantime our space program just flops around pretending to do something.

    Please don't mistake me. An astronauts life is valuable and we should make every effort to ensure they can do their work safely.

    But it seems like we are afraid to anything anymore because someone might die. All we're ever willing to do anymore beyond the ISS and shuttle flights is unmanned probes. And the commitment and motivate for these are low. Come on. By now, IMO, we ought to have a sustainable permanent platform on the moon. By now, we should have people on their way to mars.

    Instead, we're thinking about a manned mission. And we're thinking about alternative robot missions too. Let's quit thinking and start doing! I want to retire somewhere other than this planet plz.

  241. F CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I just don't understand the majority response to this.

    This is CHINA we're talking about.

    Okay, so they launched a guy into space. How?

    Where'd they get the money? Was it from 90+% taxes on farmers and businessmen? Was it taken from Hong Kong businesses by Triads employed by PRC? Did it come from factories employed with peasant workers who are forced to work and forced to live a communal existence instead of profiting on their labor? Yes, because where else would it have come from? That's China's economy.

    Where'd they get the technology? Was it gotten through espionage of the US and Russia? Was it gotten through backdoor deals with Russia of stolen US materials? Yes, because where else would it have come from? That's China's level of innovation.

    Does anyone really think this will kick the US space program into gear? Why? If anything it will kick the US spy programs into gear to keep the Chinese from stealing any future advances. And to be honest they are still 50 years behind. The X Prize will have caught up to them in a few years, why should the US Government give a rat's ass? The security implications are the same as they've been since China stole ICBM tech.

    Lastly, doesn't anyone find the comments from the 'taikonaut' to be more than a little creepy and disturbing? They are what I'd expect to hear from a Chinese national in 1930, not 2003. They are what I'd expect to hear from a brainwashed cult member, not an astronaut. His comments alone illustrate the difference between the Chinese and US space programs very well.

  242. China vs. Japan by Uncle+Barnard's+Star · · Score: 1

    The greatest value isn't the propaganda but the focusing of resources. A space program lets a governments wastes a country's resources more efficiently than a similar program to create a million Playstations. Japan's tragedy is that it didn't do it first, when it had the resources for the last two decades.

  243. Chinese space food by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1

    I loved this bit from CNN.com:

    ... Yang has a choice of 20 different space meals to enjoy, including "spicy and sour shredded meat and diced chicken,"... The food was designed to be "nutritious enough for space missions while tasting good," ...

    All I could keep thinking is that he'll be hungry again an hour later! (Luckily it is only a short flight.)

    --
    { - Generic Guy - }
  244. Re:Jealously never won a space race (partly OT) by nickco3 · · Score: 1

    Sorry for going off-topic. Honestly speaking, I see very little difference between practical applications of Fascism (3rd Reich, Mussolini's Italy) and Communism (Soviet Union, China). The rhetoric is different, but the practical effects are similar: a totalitarian state. Minorities (Jews or Tibetans or whatever) are persecuted, no criticism of the government is allowed, censorship and corruption are part of everyday life, military has a very important role in politics, ... the rant goes on and on.

    You are right, in that both types of regime are totalitarian, with little regard for individual liberty. The principle difference is Fascists believe in and support the concept of private property. As a rule of thumb, if a totalitarian government has privately owned industries then it is usually called fascist. Other distinctions along the Left-Right political spectrum are also present in their attitudes, for example should a government be secular (left wing and communist) or should it support religious morality (right wing and fascist)

    China over the last 20 years has gradually abandoned communist trappings like collectivised farming, so by this definition they be called fascist.

    --
    -- Nick "Hallo this is Beel Gates, und I pronounce weendows as ... WEENdows"
  245. Re: Perhaps this will kick the US space program? by Sir+Altitude · · Score: 1
    I had the bad luck of posting what follows just prior to the actual launch, and was thusly ignored, lol. I'm reposting it here not to get attention like China, but because I sincerely want to see some feedback. Before I do repeat it, a few remarks. One, the space shuttle is a beautiful machine, but it belongs in a museum. Think about it--it's the only spacecraft to ever kill Americans in action (Apollo 1 was on the ground, a training test) and that should raise some red flags (no pun intended) that maybe we didn't design it right. Also, we ARE capable of getting in gear and winning the next space race, it's just that the leaders in charge of it are criminally near-sighted, as I said in this post:

    On the one hand, I mostly agree with all of you that this may finally get those lazy you-know-whats at NASA off their sofas and back to work...Then I remember that we have a true nincompoop running NASA.

    It's time we put ENGINEERS back in charge of NASA instead of appointing politicians and, more recently, a bean-counter as its administrator.

    Case in point: On Sep 10, Congress cross-examined said bonehead about an intriguing idea that a Joe Ordinary engineer published in an op-ed which can be read here. It's breif, very well-versed and I definitely recommend reading it, but the ghist of it is instead of completely scrapping the shuttle (referred to as STS) and all of its infrastructure and personnel, that it is technologically and financially (read as cheaper) possible to take those people and task them to refitting existing shuttle hardware to go to Mars. Jobs are saved, progress is made, and all for cheap--irresistable, right?

    Not to our resident killjoy administrator Sean O'Keefe. At the hearings, Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) entered the full text of the op-ed into the Congressional Record, and then asked NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe what he thought of it. Mr. O'Keefe responded defending NASA's current approach, saying that the ideas in the op-ed represented "wrong headed thinking."

    It would seem, ironically enough, that NASA is behaving the way we would expect a communist regime to--CYA tactics. We saw this same behavior prior to the Soviet Union's fall (cheer): shunning innovation and new ideas in a desperate bid for self-preservation. To complete the irony, China is doing the opposite in their design for their spacecraft, going with the new school of thought in space travel: Using inexpensive off-the-shelf technology and using unconventional engineering and logistics. The former, make fun of it all you want, but the Soyuz is a tried and tested spacecraft. It beats spending billions on dollars of money wrenched from the hands of peasants to make a new bigger craft when a Soyuz is all you need for the job.

    By the latter, I refer to this detachable portion obviously meant for space station construction. This sort of approach has been called for by several engineers recently, most notably Dr. Robert Zubrin, the author of the op-ed. A few years ago, he sent NASA his idea for a Mars mission involving sending a return vehicle to Mars FIRST and have it make propellant from the chemicals in the atmosphere, and have the crew arrive in a separate "hab" craft. At the conclusion of the mission, they ditch the craft and leave in the return vehicle. Repeat several times, then can hook those unused habs together and--PRESTO! Instant Martian base! And all for the same cost as the shuttle.

    NASA didn't take too kindly to having someone challenge their plan, which involved huge orbital stations, orbiting shipyards, a lunar refueling base, and everything else logistically necessary to support it all. Price tag: $450 billion. It would seem though, that this sort of idea has found a new home with China, who are willing to adapt and accept new ideas like this.

    I certainly do hope that this will start a new space race that will end with the US on top, but I have my doubts. It's sort of a shame, we have everything we need to make, say, a mission to Mars possible.

  246. I for one welcome.. by tdsotf · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome China to the 1960's.

  247. Does anyone have audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of them saying:
    3
    2
    1
    RIFT ORF!

    Congraturations China!

  248. No, That Won't Work At All by istartedi · · Score: 1

    The scene, any bar along the Asian Pacific coast.

    Man: Hey baby, I'm a yuhangyuan--man gets slapped

    Man: But baby, I'm going up tomorrow--man gets drink thrown in face

    Woman: I don't care how hung you are, or what you hang on it. NOT IF YOU WERE THE LAST MAN ON EARTH!

    Man: No, you don't understand. I'm going to be the first man off Earth.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  249. Re:Indian Artical Insults Chinese Space Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey morons, it's not a newspaper article... It's a forum where any idiot can post.

  250. Re:And the liberal slashbots are ecstatic. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    Since I prefaced my comment with empire building and oil addiction, you are wrong :)

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  251. from a pilots point of view... by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    the flight ain't over till your on your 3rd beer.

    God Speed Yang Liwei

    memo to NASA: looks like 'Go Fever' has been cured?.

  252. Not History, Current Events by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

    What the US did to Native Americans and to slaves was appalling. The only difference is that the US does not currently do those things (or at least when it does, those responsible are punished when caught). In China, these things still happen. The attitude in China seems to be that the motherland can do no wrong, anything it does is OK. This leads to a higher probability of atrosities being committed.

    --
    while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
  253. Here we go again. by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Now we've got another bunch of "Commies" to compete against in the space race. NASA, get your ass in gear and lets get that Mars program going! Viva Capitalism!

  254. Re:Jealously never won a space race (partly OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you are aware of that there has not yet been a "communist" state in the world as of today. Every country that has tried to reach communism has failed in the stage of proletarian dictatorship.

    A communist state has no state, it has no controlling power (money, politicans, state, etc); everybody work with what they do best and everybody get what they need. Like open source software. This is not the case in either China or North korea.

  255. CONGRATS to China!! by bladeohlsson · · Score: 1

    Advancement in Science is of benifit to everyone! I look forward to the day we we all see each other as brothers and sisters of our beautiful planet.

    Then we can get together and fight the evil alien empire that lives on pluto.

    --
    http://www.ohlssonvox.com
  256. Re:Yeah, I get the Internet too by MrHyd3 · · Score: 0

    CNN right wing? Please, it's not called Clinton News Network for nothing. Fox News may seem right wing to you because you are way left of center. You never hear a FoxNews anchor offer his opinion or load a comment like you do CNN. Their shows may offer this side, but not the anchors.

    --
    -------- Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. --Ozzy
  257. Space is allways nationalistic by BenitoM · · Score: 1
    The space program from its inception (germany in the 1940's) has always been about weapons delivery. Even the "purest" civilian use of space travel is ultimately about military dominance. This was the case during the "space race" of the 1960's, and is the case now.

    The Chinese move is simply a challenge to the US dominance of space. It is the equivalence of a country's first successful nuclear test.

  258. China Sends First Taikonaut To Space by silma · · Score: 1

    It's really difficult to have a new in slashdot nowadays...

    --
    English is not my native language !
  259. Just Fascists by nnnneedles · · Score: 1

    Omg, it's a fascist state so it's ok? Jesus H. Christ in a Chicken Basket, you are severely lacking in the brain department!

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
  260. perhaps, perhaps not by jafac · · Score: 1

    "Perhaps this will kick the US space program back into gear?"

    There's only one thing that would kick the US space program back into gear - a dedicated public, and dedicated leaders. Right now, the public seems more dedicated towards gasing up their SUV's, learning who's going to be voted off the island next, or who's the next WWF Wrestling champion. First man on the moon is exiting. Good TV. Next exiting thing is first man on Mars, and that's beyond the attention span of the average American. Sad to say.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  261. Obligatory Futurama Reference by Farce+Pest · · Score: 1
    Lander returned
    to this site by the
    Historical Sticklers
    Society.
    The Series Has Landed
    --
    This message has been scanned for memes and dangerous content by MindScanner, and is believed to be unclean.
  262. And the most interesting benefit.... by LinuxMacWin · · Score: 1

    Star Trek lives...in Chinese...

    Very soon Chinese channels will be coming out with their own version of space travel series. Given the quality of recent ST series, I would not be surprised if they cooked up something way better than ST franchise.

    Hope lives...in China.

  263. TANK! by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

    we could make a "space sea-plane" so it would be able to land back in Hawaii

    Actually, we should make a "space fishing-boat". Then we could call it the "Bebop".

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  264. Next goal by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    Mars should not be the next expected goal. Capability should be the next goal. Human spaceflight capability for the US hasn't changed since 1982. The Shuttle and ISS are very old designs, and the ISS is arguably just a replacement for the MIR which worked just fine till it exceeded life-expectancy. We need a spacecraft that can actually leave LEO (the Shuttle can't). We need a lunar transfer vehicle that can go from the ISS to the moon. We need landing craft for the moon. Wee need modules for the moon. THEN (and only then) should we look at expanding that capability ro Mars. If we can live in a vacuume on the Moon, we will be able to handle the low pressure and radiation we will face at 3AU's on Mars. Most of this technology is derivative of current technology, not new technology. It is far cheaper to do it in increments than all at once (the 50 billion Mars price-tag) but we need NASA to have a vision and a road map to get there. We currently have neither.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  265. Go to heavens-above.com by joggle · · Score: 1

    Login to heavens-above.com . After you're logged in, click on "Shenzhou 5". It will show you visibility times for your location and its current position (unfortunately for me, it won't be visible before it de-orbits).

  266. WWF != WWE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    World

    Wildlife

    Fund

    Damn parasite-lawyers...litigated Rome into history now they want the WORLD

  267. Viva communism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I say viva communism! I have high hopes for the chinese space program; and lots of respect for the soviet program.

    Communist countries, in general, are much better at setting high goals; and reaching them! Goals the people want to reach - like having a permanent moon settlement. Capitalist countries are too worried about "money" or how much it "cost" - virtual things. Capitalist countries thinks it is better with "individual freedom" and "the rights of the companies" than the common goal of humanity - just look att all the IP-crap. We are a herd animal ffs, there is nothing we like more than beeing together, working together - cooperating towards our common goal! Communism fits humans like a glove on a hand. (if it werent for all the capitalist propaganda). And thats why we love open source so much!

    Without soviet I doubt that USA would be in space today. But without USA humankind would be all over space today!

    (Please note though, that neither soviet nor china where/is true communist states!)

    1. Re:Viva communism! by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, communism is one of those things that only works in theory.

  268. Re:And the liberal slashbots are ecstatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err.. no, I believe it is the US forces who are busy killing innocents. The arabs are killing illegal occupiers..

    keep dreaming you nazi eurotrash. Hopefully if the US does deside to kill some innocents one day it will start with YOU.

  269. Good Job China! Good luck on reentry! by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    This is a great step for mankind! Hopefully this will snap the space program into gear again.

    When I was a kid I heard we were supposed to build a station on the moon. A lunar space station would be the ultimate space station. Instead we got sidetracked with the space shuttle, and a poorly designed one at that. We should have used the X-33 type model. And proceded to build a lunar station with the Saturn V technology. The Chinese are smart, they may not have the same political views as the rest of us, but they are smart, and I believe capable of landing on the moon.

    This would have been the year to launch a
    mission to mars, but we missed it.

    I'd love to see a manned mars mission in my lifetime.

  270. China sent the wrong guy up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard one of the candidates was named Tang.

    The headline would have read:

    "China sends Tang into space."

  271. Re:FUCK YOU TIMOTHY by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

    It's a fuckin' typo, you anal-retentive loser. How do you survive the real world as tightly wrapped as you are?

    Massive quantities of beer.

    (lighten up, Francis.. it was a little joke...hah hah)

  272. What Space Program? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this will kick the US space program back into gear?

    Huh? I didn't realize the USA had a space program.

    You can take your "space race" sentiments and stick them firmly up your backsides. The last space race was a race to the bottom, and we've piles of rusting equipment in America to prove it. Fads and glitter can't replace a soundly built, functional space transportation system that serves to feed Human enterprise and living. We never had such a system, and still today, mention manufacturing and living in space environments and people will give you that "what a nutter" look.

    Government has only proven itself incapable of understanding how to expand culture into space. Myself, I'm placing my hopes on private enterprise seeking out exploitation of space transportation and eventually mining of energy and material resouces.

    --
    [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  273. China is worlds 2nd richest country by peter303 · · Score: 1

    When China's CDP is corrected for its artificially devalued currency, it exceeds Japan, which is current #2. Therefore it has a fair amount of resources to do ambitious projects like a space program.

    China's currency has been fixed at 8.3 to the dollar. It thought to be really worth much more, somewheres between 3-5 to the dollar. The US and WTO have been pressuring China to float its currency. A cheap currency keeps labor costs and exports cheap and imports expense, so China has the largest trade surplus in the world.

  274. This man will die horribly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody knows not a single invention has ever come from China. They're a bunch of underdeveloped, motherfuckingly brainless idiots. They are totally incapable of building anything even remotely functional. The taikonaut (a stupid word - but the Chinese are too braincancerous to understand the word astronaut) will burn up painfully upon reentry, ashaming him and his worthless shitty cancercountry forever!

    You know I'm right. ;)

  275. China Burned Its Merchant Ships by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    If China becomes the dominant spacefaring superpower it will be because their bureaucrats had the wisdom to burn their merchant ships the first time they returned from Africa and went isolationist rather than becoming a colonial power.

    I have a very strong suspicion that the West will be unable to extracate itself from the ethnic conflicts that are so beseting it -- arising from globalist projection of power -- and that China will be able to develop its ability to project power to space unimpeded.

    China should give back Tibet to the Tibetans however this is nothing compared to what the West should give back not only to those not of European ancestry but to those of European descent who no more "Western" in its globalist colonialism than Tibetans are Chinese.

    As I've said before:

    It is increasingly obvious with the shrinking globe that the primordial human right is the right of self-determination. All other rights are null and void if that is violated simply because different people may differ profoundly on what they see as essential human rights.

    Logic such as this could have resolved the conundrum of the Confederacy by stating simply that the north had a right to invade the south for the sole purpose of giving slaves the right of self-determination -- and that the right of the Confederacy to secede was not the issue.

    Of course, as the globe shrinks there are opportunities to violate the self-determination of a lot more of the people than ever before. Hence the real test of a sovereign's committment to human rights is its committment to expanding the ecological range of Earth.

    Is China so committed? If we learn nothing from NASA at all but the following, the investment in NASA may have been worthwhile:
    Declarations of intent from bureaucracies are not trustworthy unless combined with profound competitive pressures consciously recognized by the politicians as forcing them to stop treating their technologists as a resource they can milk when convenient or desparate and then discard when sailing is smooth.
  276. Chinese Astronaut: "I Feel Good" by RichardX · · Score: 1

    "I feel good," Yang radioed back from space, followed by "Doodle-oodle-oodle-oo, I knew that I would!"

    --
    Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  277. with Russian equipment...... by ksheff · · Score: 1

    China can say how great their accomplishment is, but the fact remains that most of their stuff is refurb Russian hardware. It would be like the US selling Mexico or Brazil some old equipment. (Actually, it would not be a bad idea for the US to start using some of the simpler, proven tech to send people into space.)

    What I'm surprised at is why the Europeans haven't done this before? They've been launching satellites for years. What's stopping them from putting a guy in a capsule and putting it in orbit?

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  278. Re:Indian Artical Insults Chinese Space Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was an EDITORIAL! Anybody can write editorial in the Times of India? you idiot.

  279. 1 down 999,999,999 to go! by inteller · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to get some of those little concrete trinkets made by the chinese moon dust farmers in 2030!

    At least now China has an alternate place to send all of its political prisoners....the exile to Tibet thing just didnt work out.

  280. democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    When the small, monolithic elite decides something in China, everyone has to shut up, expect when they are told to cheer.
    Who decided the DMCA? A small monolithic elite. There are many other examples, are we really that far off from china?

    Three chears for the DMCA!
  281. Tsien Hsue-shen, founder of China's rocket program by hpulley · · Score: 1

    Turns out the Chinese actually got rocketry help from the same guy, Von Braun, that got the US and USSR started. Was in the US Army too, before being sent back to China for being called a communist. See this article as posted here in the Toronto Star.

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
  282. Here's a thought.... by ViolentGreen · · Score: 0

    What do you think will happen if, God forbid, there is some kind of failure on re-entry and the ship is lost.

    Would China own up to it? You can be sure there won't be investigations into the safeness if it's program like NASA's.

    My suspicions are that we wouldn't know anyway. They just get someone to play the part of the XXXXXnaut in the celebrations.

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  283. Strife and ennuie is right! by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    The biggest social problem of today is TOO MUCH CONTROL and inspection of our personal lives. Most people today feel like we can't take a dump in america without somebody having something to say about it. If we felt we were opening up a new frontier, even if we ourselves didn't get to go, we'd feel better about our miserable cubicles.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  284. He will be back soon. by CZ2F · · Score: 1

    Now only 1 circle and half left on orbit. He will be back soon. Good luck.

  285. No Problem by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    USA interests SHOULD come first, foremost and exclusively.

    The rest of the looser countries can take a flying leap.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  286. China by panxerox · · Score: 0

    China: where the space program is the end and the bureaucracy is the means. America: where the bureaucracy is the end and the space program is the means. Yeah I'm bitter the future wasent supposed to be like this.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  287. Re:Jealously never won a space race (partly OT) by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    Minorities (Jews or Tibetans or Muslims or whatever) are persecuted, no criticism of the government is allowed, censorship and corruption are part of everyday life, military has a very important role in politics, ... the rant goes on and on.

    Are we talking about the Nazis and the Communists or are we talking about the USA? Think about it for a second before you mod me down.

    Back on topic:
    I haven't heard of any big Chinese Space achievements before this.

    You have to start somewhere. We didn't have much of a space program in the 60s, but we built one with a manned program. We didn't start with Hubble; we didn't start with GPS; we didn't start with shuttles and a space station; we started with launching a man into space and went from there. China's doing the same thing. Why criticize their space program for starting from zero? That's where they're at, so that's where they're starting from. We did the same thing 40 years ago, and now we've all forgotten about it. Go China.

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  288. New Testament by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Why christians eat pigs?

    Because the New Testament rescinded the dietary prohibitions. Look it up.

  289. according to my "boy's book of knowledge..." by The_Rook · · Score: 1

    did you know that the pidgeon (actually Columba livia or rock dove) is the only bird in the world that can drink liquids by using suction? all others have to take a beakful of liquid and then tilt their heads back to dring.

    in their native, non-urban, environment, columba livia eats seeds by grabbing the top of a stalk of grass with its beak, shaking the stalk, and then picking up the seeds that fall. a practice that is equally effective with pizza crusts.

    --
    when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  290. Rough order of magnitude? by RoboProg · · Score: 1

    So, any estimate of the actual values of these 2 quantities? (NASA budget vs. commercial satellite industry gross / profits)

    I'm not familiar with that data, and would appreciate a hint, even if 1960 vs. 2000 dollars aren't adjusted, and there's only 1 significant digit. I suppose something on google would tell me, if I had a half hour to bumble around looking...

    --
    Yow! I'm supposed to have a plan?
    1. Re:Rough order of magnitude? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      NASA budget this year is $15.3 billion.

      WORLDWIDE (not US only) satellite launch revenue for 2002: $86 billion.

      This is sort of apples and oranges. America runs approximately half the worldwide satellite launch industry, so call it $40 odd billion in revenues. (not profits).

      So, these are some real hand-wavy statistics I'm showing here. I believe that the launch industry is a tiny fraction of the overall business revenue attributable to satellites. (Think telecom and television)

      Now, you could certainly argue "Well, obviously unmanned space flight is profitable! No reason not to keep that up!" I'd answer that argument by saying that we can not estimate the monetary benefits that will come from manned space exploration and exploitation. The cost of a manned space program is small relative to the revenues its research has generated, and there's no reason to suppose that that pattern will not continue.

      Just so's you know, there are reputable scientists who think that a continuing series of Mars missions would take ten years and approximately $40 billion dollars (over ten years, mind you) to
      start. Continuing launches would be pretty darn cheap. If you're not excited by the prospects of colonizing another planet, there's really nothing I can say that could possibly get your attention.

      Does that help?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  291. I wonder by RichardY · · Score: 1
    Due to lack of funds, I imagine that the chinese will find cheaper options for many aspects of their space craft. This may include reusable parts and common sense design parameters.

    This may well prove to be the best way to advance our adventures into space, especially as the ESA and NASA projects are so expensive at the moment.

    Always reminds me of the story of NASA spending millions of dollars designing a pen that can be used upside down, and the Russians just using a pencil!

  292. Jesus said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why christians eat pigs? If you can discard something that is clearly commanded to you in a document supposedly from your god, then what value is your religion anymore?

    IIRC, In the new testament Jesus makes several statements discarding much of what the old testament says, including the rules for eating, the requirement for mutilation of children via circumcision, and all that stuff about eye-for-an-eye.

    George W. didn't hear that last part, though.

  293. Re:Jealously never won a space race (partly OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go back 20-30 years, what you said was true. Right now, for what I see and what I feel, your view of China is basicly wrong.