Slashdot Mirror


How to Set Up a Gift Website?

falzbro writes "I'm considering giving my parents their very own website for the holidays. However, it's harder than anticipated to find any type of Content Management System whose intended audience is a computer illiterate family. I personally use Drupal for content and Gallery for photo albums, and frankly can't stand PHPNuke. The only features required would be a blog of sorts and a photo album. I can't be the first one in this predicament, can I?"

447 comments

  1. Fix the Drupal link please by UnConeD · · Score: 3, Informative

    The colon in http:// is missing.

    We can handle a slashdotting ;).

    1. Re:Fix the Drupal link please by morcego · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okey, lets post the correct link here, so we can help /.'ing it a bit.

      drupal.org

      --
      morcego
    2. Re:Fix the Drupal link please by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny
      The colon in http:// is missing.

      Don't worry, there's more than enough colon here!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Fix the Drupal link please by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that, because even with the broken link things were going rather slow. I don't think it's my OC-12, either...

  2. Are the computer illiterate worthwhile? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you don't know what binary is...do you even deserve to live?

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Are the computer illiterate worthwhile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're computer illiterate, why would even want a blog?

    2. Re:Are the computer illiterate worthwhile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're computer illiterate, why would even want a blog?

      If you're computer litterate, why would you even want a blog?

    3. Re:Are the computer illiterate worthwhile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if your computar literit why wood yuo wan't an blog?

    4. Re:Are the computer illiterate worthwhile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i lou compar lira wo yo wo a bog?

    5. Re:Are the computer illiterate worthwhile? by NortWind · · Score: 1

      eh fewer come pewter ill iterate, wywoo dewey vanwan tab log?

  3. .mac by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you won't have the vanity of familysmith.com, but if your parents have a macintosh, iPhoto does makes web photo journals nice and easy.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:.Mac by BWJones · · Score: 4, Funny

      Get them an iMac with a .Mac account. It handles all your needs :)

      I second this. I purchased an iBook and a .Mac account for my sister who just had a kid so she could do just this sort of thing for family around the world so we can all see pictures of the baby. She is a complete computer novice, but her digital camera was immediately recognized so she could download pictures and then post them to her .Mac website so we can all see them. Additionally, there is/was a free iBlog program that came with the .Mac account.

      She tells me "I had no idea setting up and running a website was this easy. All that time you spent on your computer years ago entering all that HTML code was kinda wasted. Wasn't it?". I responded with something like, "uhhhhh, yeah. But back then....

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:.mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they have a Mac and you have a Gallery get them iPhotoToGallery. Makes publishing from iPhoto to Gallery a snap.

    3. Re:.mac by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Funny

      you won't have the vanity of familysmith.com

      Sod the vanity, that Kelly is HOT!

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    4. Re:.mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    5. Re:.mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mom is hotter!

    6. Re:.mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mom is more into Alsations than Humans.

    7. Re:.mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCKTARD

    8. Re:.mac by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you do want your own domain, how about a Wiki? It doesn't get much easier than a link called "Edit This Page". There are a few varieties to choose from; one with authentication and file attachment capabilities would work for a simple blog/photo gallery site. That way your family can have total control over every aspect of the website, but it can still be incredibly easy to modify.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    9. Re:.Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No XP, please. The trashman has enough to carry to the dump, and they'll be adding any computer that has XP installed on it. Mine has crashed a dozen times this evening alone. I'll have to use Debian for serious web-surfing, without fear of constant crashes. That's sad, really, as my Debian box cost me $75, plus a modem, and a new HDD, and the cost of the Book/Debian CD. This XP box cost $2300.00. Sorry to have to report this so close to Xmas, but that's the facts.

    10. Re:.mac by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Oh, was that necessary. I could have lived a fully life without seeing that picture.

      Right now the family Smith is wondering why their traffic has spiked...

    11. Re:.mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awwww c'mon .... did you see the parents? She is the definition of "genetically challenged".

    12. Re:.mac by viware · · Score: 1

      Wiki is not easy to grasp for the uninitiated. I wouldnt even let my parents near a wiki. They are obviously not going to need the power of a wiki either.

      What they need is a very simple form, with a very small amount of formatting available, in easy to click button form like a word processor.

    13. Re:.mac by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

      Their blog was last updated in 2002, someone should probably make sure everythings OK at the ole Smith home...

      http://familysmith.com/weblog/smithstories.html

      CB

    14. Re:.mac by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

      BTW, here's some of the facinating commentary (they must post more!):

      Our visit with the Nash family was nice but short. We all can't wait until we get to see them again! Recently the Smith Family went on a little vacation. We traveled to San Antonio, Texas and stayed there for two nights. Our first stop in San Antonio was the I-MAX theaters to see a movie called the Alamo. After the movie, we went to see the Alamo. Everyone got a souvenir from the Alamo giftshop to remember our trip there. After the Alamo we went to the San Antonio river to see the River Walk. We had ice cream at a restaurant on the river and finished our visit of the river by a boatride. We were all squished, but I think we still had fun. That night we ate at the Tower Restaurant. The Tower Restaurant is a revolving restaurant!!! We discovered that it takes 50 minutes for the restaurant to go in one complete circle. (Random info that you may someday want to know. hehe) Wow, I wrote a lot about just one day of our vacation. I'll let someone else talk about the rest of our vacation. Until next time, goodbye!

      Guess their trial AOL must have ran out. What? A revolving restaurant!!! They got Alamo souvenirs and ice cream??? Wowser, party time for the Smiths!

      CB

    15. Re:.Mac by hendridm · · Score: 1

      How is this on-topic? The poster asked for a CMS solution, not a recommendation to spend big bucks on a new computer only to use a proprietary version. He even provided open-source, non-platform-specific examples, and you fanboys STILL mention to get your "GO BUY A MAC" commented modded to +5.

    16. Re:.mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a far better pic of Kelly!

    17. Re:.mac by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      Why are Wikis not easy to grasp? An "Edit This Page" button is pretty simple, and you don't have to worry about formatting or links or anything if you don't want to. I don't see how you could make a simple form any simpler than a Wiki. Maybe for a photo album you could, but for a simple editable page of text a Wiki is about as simple as you can get. If I spent 5 minutes explaining a Wiki to my mom I'm sure she'd have no trouble maintaining a simple webpage.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    18. Re:.mac by absurdhero · · Score: 1

      I have actually set up a wiki for a nontechnical person before. I came into it with the same thoughts that you have. The person was fairly intelligent and grapsped the overall content of a wiki quickly. However, the things you take for granted such as understanding tags and text formatting, were far more complicated than was expected.
      People want a nice little bold button to bold their text, they want to see the formatting effect their text right away, and any nontechnical person expecting to be able to put multiple columns (a la tables), resizing pictures, uploading pictures, alignment, etc, will be very dissappointed in the unexpected complexities and thinking involved. It is akin to telling a person to write a word processing document in html. It isn't impossible for them to learn fairly quickly but it is unexpectedly unnatural and combersome to the nontechnical type. They truly have come to expect things to "just work" and to have all the features of their favorite office suite with out any extra hassle.
      I agree that your mother could probably maintain a small wiki just fine after one session of working with her. The trouble is that people tend to want their pages to be pretty, they want to add graphics, etc. and when they ask you where the insert graphic button is or why ctrl-b isn't bolding the text, they feel bad when you show them that it is very different and requires more steps.
      I finally came to understand this and I write custom blogging systems for my loved ones where I have total control over the simplicity and feature set. Your milage may vary :)

    19. Re:.mac by greenhide · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    20. Re:.mac by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't expect a nontechnical person to grasp Wiki markup at all. I'm just imagining a very simple site that they can use to post text and maybe a few images (TWikis allow image attatchments fairly easily, can't say about the other varieties). Most blogs consist mainly of plain text anyway. Of course tables and resized pictures and things aren't going to be possible without an understanding of HTML (or the Wiki equivalent), but I don't think any other CMS or blog site out there would make those any easier.

      What is really needed is a new "html editor" tag for XHTML. Like <input type="html">. Simple text browsers or embedded browsers could just treat these the same as text boxes, letting the user type HTML tags in directly if they want, while Mozilla/IE/Konqueror could provide a nice visual interface with buttons for bold, italics, links, creating a table, or whatever. This would enable a much nicer interface for forum/blog posts, and also a sort of Super-Wiki where absolutely everything is editable in a nice, easy visual way. Does XForms contain such a tag? That would be really cool.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    21. Re:.mac by tf23 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of an episode of Southpark that was on a week or two ago (ie w/ the Mormons)

    22. Re:.Mac by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      Um, he wants to pay 20 or 30 bucks for a domain name and website, not $1500 on a computer.

    23. Re:.mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Our faces are painted!"

      "Martin Haris dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb"

    24. Re:.mac by CharterTerminal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Peter [...] is trying not to pee in his big boy underpants but at lunch he failed his mission. He is wearing his Pull-ups once again.

      Folks, I think we can all sympathize with Peter. (I'm trying not to pee in my big boy underpants, too!)

    25. Re:.mac by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

      As long as you try your best, we're still proud of you.

      Hey, dig Mr. Smith working on the routing problem with MAE-West!
      http://familysmith.com/Bennett/Bennett%27s%20Image s/Moffett/chart.jpg

      (wonder if all of that info from NASA should be on his site...)

      CB

    26. Re:.mac by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Moz and IE already have proprietary HTML input controls. You can use browser-sniffing or Javascript to substitute these for plain-text input fields where available.

    27. Re:.mac by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1
      Well, that's kinda cool, but the interface browsers are giving web designers is retarded. What is really needed is an with a built-in user interface, not a variety of incompatible Javascript APIs for performing editing-type actions on an iframe or div.

      Doing it this way requires each site to have its own Javascript editing interface. Complex interfaces made in Javascript by web designers will be hard to use, buggy, and browser-specific with lots of ugly browser detection hacks (and probably not forward compatible with new browsers for this reason). They will not follow the user-interface guidelines for the platform they're running on and will not be able to adapt to different editing environments (such as a computer without a mouse, a PDA, or one of those speech browsers for the blind). The browser should provide the editing interface, because only the browser knows the capabilities of the user and the hardware.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    28. Re:.mac by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      You seem to have misunderstood. I was suggesting that one could use Javascript to detect whether the browser has an HTML control and then substitute one of those for an ordinary text input field. The browser would provide the editing interface. Something like this would be necessary even if an HTML input field was standardised, since older browsers would not support it.

    29. Re:.mac by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1
      Well, you could do that if there was an HTML control to substitute. AFAIK currently there is no ready-made HTML control with a built-in interface to substitute for a text field in either Mozilla or IE. There are ways of creating a HTML editor in Javascript (IE's contentEditable/designMode attribute and Mozilla's designMode attribute) but they come with no built-in interface beyond a flashing cursor. To actually *use* any of the html editor's features such as bold/italic/centered text or inserting links/tables/lists, you must provide a user interface to those features in Javascript. Furthermore, the Javascript API given to these features is bad. For example, creating a link will fail if there is no text selected, but there is no way to tell if any text is selected beforehand, and I don't even think there is an easy way to tell if the command succeeded afterward. Also, there is no way to insert arbitrary HTML code, you must use the couple of predefined "editing actions" given by Mozilla/IE.

      Certainly if there was a suitable HTML control available, Javascript would be used to substitute it for a textarea when it was available, so older browsers could be supported. That would be the smart thing to do. But today's HTML editing controls require a whole interface built in Javascript as well, which is just retarded. Once again, what is needed is an <input type="html"> with a built-in interface.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    30. Re:.mac by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... if there's one thing I've learned from this Ask Slashdot, it's to make sure that I remove all of the WS_FTP.LOG files from my website...

  4. ::cough:: by 3Suns · · Score: 0, Funny

    ::cough::slashcode::cough::cough::

    (sorry, had to be said)

    --

    -3Suns

    ~~~~
    The Revolution will be Slashdotted
  5. In all seriousness by swordboy · · Score: 1, Troll

    It really sounds like you are looking for AOL.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  6. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man, you must really hate your parents to give them such a crappy gift. Why?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame your kin are as stupid as you. Some of us do wish the enter the world of web publishing.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, more than likely this is a case of a geeky son projecting his interests on his parents so he can get them a gift he likes rather than one they like. He needs to not be so selfish.

  7. Your parents will hate you by alex_ant · · Score: 0

    What a failure of a son you are, to be giving your parents a WEBSITE for christmas. "Oh, son, it's... ... ...... wonderful! Thank you so much. ............" What's the matter, would it be too man-like of you to knit them scarves or something?

  8. .Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Get them an iMac with a .Mac account. It handles all your needs :)

  9. .mac? by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I know it's not free, but they make it pretty brainless for anyone to set up a site.

    --
    If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
  10. Blogger by hao2lian · · Score: 1

    Blogger is relatively simple enough. Choose a template and start typing stuff. Then hit the big Post and Publish button. I don't know about photos though.

    --
    Pelé!
    1. Re:Blogger by Sitka_Larry · · Score: 1

      I agree that Blogger is probably what would be easiest, especially the Blog*Spot option, since you're willing to spend a little $$$. I'm using the free version, which doesn't allow for image uploads, but if the Blog*Spot version is similar, it should be ideal.

    2. Re:Blogger by blurfus · · Score: 1

      I believe image uploading is free ever since Google bought them out...
      AFAIK, blogger now is completely free....
      and yes, it is pretty easy to use...

      --
      will work for Karma
    3. Re:Blogger by Sitka_Larry · · Score: 1

      I've seen no way to upload images in my free account. I can certainly reference images on an external site for inclusion in my blog, but that seems uncool. The blogger upgrade page does seem to make an emphasis of image uploads for the Blog*Spot option.

    4. Re:Blogger by hao2lian · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I can't upload images on mine (free blogspot).

      --
      Pelé!
  11. moveabletype by verch · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want to give them blog functionality, I'm a big fan of moveable type : http://www.moveabletype.org

    I know lots of tech challanged people who use it for their sites.

    1. Re:moveabletype by hao2lian · · Score: 1

      The family might start blundering about the server settings, which is not a Good Thing(tm).

      --
      Pelé!
    2. Re:moveabletype by morcego · · Score: 5, Informative

      Looking at the moveabletype website, I just noticed they saying:

      If you just want to get started with a full-featured weblog, we recommend TypePad, our simple weblog service, which is based on the Movable Type engine and requires no installation. TypePad weblogs are easy to customize and offer features like photo albums without requiring you to have a web server or any technical knowledge.

      Haven't tried it, but looks like just what you want.

      Link

      --
      morcego
    3. Re:moveabletype by spoot · · Score: 1

      Moveable type is great. Also check out the excellent applescript studio software Kung Log for managing your web log. Including uploading and thumbnails of your picts.

  12. Why not DIY? by tabacco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not make your own? that way it's exactly how you want it, and it means more as a gift.

    1. Re:Why not DIY? by Wakkow · · Score: 1

      Because compared to the systems already there, a DIY system wouldn't fit the bill. I mean, sure it works great for you because you know the kinks and how to get around bugs. If you're giving it to someone less computer literate, try to build a decent photo album program that'd work better than Gallery. I can install the Gallery Remote program on someone's computer and let them go at it.

    2. Re:Why not DIY? by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

      First rate idea, then you could release your work with a GPL then allow the whole world to benefit from your gift, you could call it 'Christmas' and have the slogan 'so easy your parents can use it'. You won't make any money, but that's not what giving is all about.

    3. Re:Why not DIY? by trippinonbsd · · Score: 1

      Even with my intermediate experience with mysql and php it would not be too hard for me to write some basic scripts to do these kinds of things. Simple user name password authentication then submit the entry into the database. It can be as simple as possible. Several hours of work could get a working prototyped hammered out. If you understand mysql and php it should be a breeze, for those who enjoy this kinda of thing.

    4. Re:Why not DIY? by tabacco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but for one thing, it's pretty crummy to say to someone "For your christmas present I'm going to install some free software I found on the internet on your machine!"

      Secondly, squashing bugs aren't that hard when you don't overcomplicate your program. This guy's family doesn't need anything fancy, just a way to get their thanksgiving photos online and to post what Cousin Bob is up to these days. Writing something that can do that is pretty trivial.

    5. Re:Why not DIY? by tabacco · · Score: 1

      Exactly... it's blogging, not rocket science :)

    6. Re:Why not DIY? by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      Be sure to test several designs of your new hexagonal wheel before you go live with it you savvy inventor you.

      What would be the point of that?

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    7. Re:Why not DIY? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Something what he's looking for isn't rocket science. Writing it himself, it'll give exactly the features that he wants to offer them.. More than likely, everything he finds out there will be missing a little something.

      One of the sites that I write for required a seriously huge content management system, with all kinds of wierd stuff special to that site. For giggles, I wrote the front end in PHP, which allows users to upload files, and do a whole bunch of functions. The back end is written in Perl. The admin users can do a variety of photoprocessing passed on to ImageMagick. If that isn't enough for them, they have the option to push one button in the browser, and have the image open up on their local machine in PhotoShop. (that was a bit harder to pull off). Then there are a huge variety of sorting functions, publishing management options, etc, etc.. Finally, once it's done, it reaches the web page on the scheduled date.

      Of course, most of that is *WAY* beyond what he requires..

      The way I'd write his application would be something like this...

      Store all the images in one directory. Write a simple upload page to let them upload individual images or zip files. Assign the images a unique name (we know users can't do that themselves) before sticking them in the common directory.

      He'd need a database to hold a little information. Something along the lines of image_id, image_name, image_description, image_comment, section, sort_order. The image_id is a unique number (incrementing, duh). The next four are obvious. The last one would be the order that it's sorted on the result page. People always want to rearrange their stuff, for some reason.

      The last page would be to display the images. List all the sections, let the viewing user pick which section to view (Christmas 1999), and when they've selected a section, show the images, sorted by sort_order.

      That would consist of just a few pages. Not very hard.

      Then the question is, what's he looking for in regards to blogging? Slashcode is great if you have lots of users, lots of stuff, or require lots of configurability.. But probably he just wants a simple chat system. One page to insert messages, one to display the last x messages (last 20, or whatever). Again, simple stuff.

      I've written a few of these, each one specific to it's application. Our intranet has the most basic type (described above), which was exactly what was required. It's written in ColdFusion, with a MSSQL database, and currently only has about 16,000 records in it.. I have one that's quite a bit more complex on another site written in Perl with a MySQL database, holding 4,000,000 records.. It has serious administrative and anti-abuse capabilities, and has thousands of "topics"..

      The ColdFusion one took about an hour to write, because I'm not terribly proficent in ColdFusion (I don't use it much). The second took me about a day to write, and little code changes over the years to stop various kinds of abuses and add features that the site owner wanted..

      Really, he should/could write his parents site in just a couple days.. They'd probably be very proud of him, and thank him a whole lot more than if he just put a pre-written package up for them.

      But hey, I'm a programmer, I'd write it if my mom wanted one. It's really up to his abilities.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:Why not DIY? by GORby_ · · Score: 1

      I don't undferstand this... most people in here like the GPL, and some even advise the OP to create a new app and make it GPL.

      But, what about just taking the GPL app that most closely fits your needs, and then make some changes so it exactly fits your needs... that's what GPL apps are all about, right?

  13. DIY by xchino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you really want it to be a gift, customize it yourself. Just find a good php script that does each of the things you require, then customize and combine them. Then you can create your own administration interface, or combine the admin interfaces of the individual scripts if possible. I've never found a CMS I liked, as they all seem to try to do too much, and it becomes a pain to customize them due to their massive codebase. And you're wise to stay away from PHPNuke.

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    1. Re:DIY by mystran · · Score: 1
      I agree here.

      For someone able to program, putting a simple content management system (which does exactly what is needed and nothing more) is not that hard. I'd expect that to take at most three days with something like PHP, at least if you are going to host the site on a server with a decent RDBMS.

      The trouble is that while it's easy to create a personalized system, is much harder to create an universal one. Most of the systems that would have the set of features you need, also have everything else under the sun, which usually makes the system more complicated to use.

      Actually, I've been missing a simple, generic system with some kind of plug-in style system. The trouble is, the interface to add/write plug-ins whould have to be simple enough.

      The problem with PHPNuke and the likes is that it's often easier to write a custom system than setup a nuke-system.

      I've tried creating a platform a couple of times, mostly with PHP. The most successful (for my personal use, not really suitable for releasing) was a fully custom HTTP server written in Ruby. (ofcourse I had apache as proxy and static-content server, althought the server could handle all common web-browsers directly as well).

      This allowed an architecture where I could write a simple class everytime I needed a new feature. No API interfacing glue, nothing, just a class that has methods for some attributes like titlebar and another which would return the actual page, optionally a POST handler.

      I'd actually love to work on something like this, but unfortunately I have no server available these days where I could have any dynamic content mechanism, let alone an RDBMS.

      Which makes me wonder, are there any offline CMS in open source, that would be worth trying. Fog Creek has Citydesk, but that's commercial and more importantly, doesn't run on Linux.

      --
      Software should be free as in speech, but if we also get some free beer, all the better.
    2. Re:DIY by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "And you're wise to stay away from PHPNuke."

      Not least because its author is violating the GPL [you're not allowed to change the copyright notice on the bottom of each page]

  14. not sure about the gallery.. but for blogging by xntrik · · Score: 0, Redundant

    you could try them with a MoveableType .. or if not .. try a Livejournal .. They're just the two ideas that would be pretty simple .. oh and hacking up a php or perl site with really really simple input wouldn't be too hard either.

  15. iPhoto & .Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They were designed specifically for this problem. Of course, you need a mac...

  16. What about PostNuke? by The_Myth · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know the author has had serious problems with PHPNuke but the PostNuke project branched away from PHPNuke a while back. There are plugins for it to incorporate the Coppermine Gallery amongst others and is very easy to maintain and customise.

    http://www.postnuke.com

    --
    The MyTh - I am a figment of the Imagination - [Im Probably even not here]
    1. Re:What about PostNuke? by javahack · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was going to make the same recommendation. I set up gallery as a module in PostNuke. I had some problems setting it up as the start page, but it looks like the problem's been corrected in the latest CVS version. (Read more here). I must say I'm impressed with both Gallery and PostNuke, and with a bit of instruction, a non-technical person should be able to administer a website built on a combination of the two.

    2. Re:What about PostNuke? by jck9626 · · Score: 0

      me too ... After "renting" the cable co.'s PVR my p3 600 (myth box) no longer has a use therefore I too am considering setting up a family web server.
      After some preliminary research I have been considering such a solution including Coppermine Gallery and some BBS system. Got any recommendations and/or other solutions?
      -joel

    3. Re:What about PostNuke? by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      Why is it that PostNuke, so many web sites, doesn't have any obvious way to find out WHAT THE FUCK THE PROJECT IS? The I can't find anything on that page that says what PostNuke is, or why I should care. If it's there, it's well hidden.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    4. Re:What about PostNuke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Im Probabely even not here]

      Well, you certainly can't spell.

    5. Re:What about PostNuke? by pwiebe · · Score: 1

      Does PostNuke have any active current development?

      I looked at it a few months ago, and didn't see many signs that anyone was fixing old problems or introducing new features.

    6. Re:What about PostNuke? by Grant29 · · Score: 1

      I am running a site on Postnuke now. Check out Retail Retreat. (Right now my theme kinda sucks, but I will have a new one up shortly). It's not very hard to setup and you can really configure things through the GUI. I have messed with PHPNuke as well, and it seems to have a lot more user community written modules and blocks. Postnuke has many useful ones, but not as many. One good thing with Postnuke is that they have a very good support through thier forums. I asked a question there yesterday and got a response literally in minutes.

      One nice thing about Postnuke is that you can make many configurations online. A lot of PHPnuke files require a .cfg file that you have to manually edit and re-upload to the host provider.

      I haven't used the gallery modules on my production sites, but I have used them on a test server. The menalto gallery module works will under both CMSs.

      Another plus of the Postnuke CMS is that the main forums module is modified from phbb2 and called PNphpBB. It allows seamless integration with Postnuke and will even take on the theme colors.

    7. Re:What about PostNuke? by Grant29 · · Score: 1

      I hate to respond to myself, but here are a couple of other things I should have mentioned. Postnuke has a totally different permissions structure. You can set any module or block with permissions. You can create user groups, have admins, registered users, guest visitors, etc... For each module/block, you can set who can view it, edit it, make comments, etc... It's pretty nice. For a family website you can always create user groups so that you can keep some family pictures private from guest visitors. You can even create forums only for the family to keep trolls from posting.

    8. Re:What about PostNuke? by The+infamous+red+pil · · Score: 1

      Yes! PostNuke is currently in version .726, but version .8 may be released as soon as early December. Recently, a project summary was posted on the pnNEWS site.

    9. Re:What about PostNuke? by The+infamous+red+pil · · Score: 1

      Here's the official PostNuke What is PostNuke? page.

    10. Re:What about PostNuke? by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      And is it linked *anywhere* from the main page? I sure as hell can't find it.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    11. Re:What about PostNuke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just try to find info about the Nuke capabilities, particularly try to find a module which does something useful.

  17. Have you considered... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    mac.com?

    *ducks*

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    1. Re:Have you considered... by hondo77 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seriously. iMac, .Mac, iBlog. Done.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    2. Re:Have you considered... by switcha · · Score: 0, Troll
      Duck, my ass. It couldn't get easier. iPhoto lets them (technophobes) assemble pictures in a logical manner (albums) then click a button to upload to a webpage with built-in slideshow. The maximum brain trauma involved is picking a frame style and 2 or 3 column layout. Totally mom-proof.

      I tried iBlog the other day, and if I gave a crap about telling the world anything, I would use that. Very easy and about a 4/5 on the intuitive-meter.

      However, I'm gonna assume that the reason the submitter is giving them a website is because he can't afford a Mac plus .Mac as a gift. It's a shame.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    3. Re:Have you considered... by jafac · · Score: 1

      don't you mean;
      dotDone?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:Have you considered... by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Actually, after I posted I realized I should have written "iDone". ;-) .Done works, too.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    5. Re:Have you considered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Mac?

      Have you considered...

      1000's of dollars of new (overpriced) equipment, retraining of the family to use macs, spending 100's of dollars on new software (office) and stiffing the family out on the plethora of windows based games?

      Listen up you mac-turds, THINK DIFFERENT!

    6. Re:Have you considered... by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      so if they use PC's then the cost of the gift has gone from time spent to $1000?

  18. InkNoise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    InkNoise is an excellent new blog/website system. Check it out.

  19. Plone by Gunfighter · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try Plone. It's easy to install, works right out of the box, and has available blog and photoalbum modules that are easy to install and configure.

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
    1. Re:Plone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if the family does not have a handy root-accessible web account somewhere where they can run a persistant web process within the terms of use of said web hoster?

      Zope + Plone are great, albeit huge software products, but this is definitely not for the uninitiated nor a techno illiterate user.

      Plus, you'll need a web hosting account that supports Zope (there are some, but less common).

      Nothing in this recipie sounds like "easy"

    2. Re:Plone by Bigbiff · · Score: 1

      I have been messing with this, and it's a great thing to use. It gives the ability for a user not to know any html and publish viable content quickly.

      --
      Bigbiff http://www.exxtreme-linux.org
    3. Re:Plone by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      That's what I did, wish someone had told me about the 2gb zodb filesize limit.
      Yes, I know it's technically not Plone's fault, but I bet I'm not the first person to encounter it needlessly. A simple warning in any of a number of places would have been appreciated.

    4. Re:Plone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't put 2 gig of data in the database. use external files -- that's what they are for.

    5. Re:Plone by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      I was just using the photoalbums and kept adding pictures to them. I had no idea I had to worry about filesize. Besides, if you set it up right you don't have to worry about it.

    6. Re:Plone by SlightOverdose · · Score: 1

      The 2 Gig limit has nothing to do with Zope. It's a filesystem limitation, and can affect any database. That said, it would be nice to span the DB over multiple files.

    7. Re:Plone by Gunfighter · · Score: 1

      FYI, newer versions of Zope have the to mount additional ZODBs in the hierarchy. You're no longer limited to just one database. I haven't fooled with this yet, but it looks promising.

      --
      -- Stu

      /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
    8. Re:Plone by jvervloet · · Score: 1

      I didn't actually try one of the alternatives mentioned in this discussion. But when I look at the web sites of the different solutions, it's remarkable that only the home page of Plone validates as XHTHML 1.0 transitional, and uses div structures instead of tabulars. If I need a content management system one day, I'll try this one first.

    9. Re:Plone by jvervloet · · Score: 1
      XHTHML

      ... which should be XHTML of course :-) Pity that it is served as text/html instead of application/xhtml+xml, like it should be.

    10. Re:Plone by JanJoost · · Score: 1
      The 2 GB limit is more a libc limit than Zope/Plone.

      The solution to this is to compile Python with the right options against the correct libc.

      The FreeZope.org server we run has a ZODB of on average about 8 GB and occasionally grows to over 10 GB.

      In short, recompile Python like this:

      export CC="gcc -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"
      ./configure --prefix=/some/directory --with-thread; make; make install

      Warning, this probably is very linux specific :)

    11. Re:Plone by MartinB · · Score: 1

      and if the family does not have a handy root-accessible web account somewhere where they can run a persistant web process within the terms of use of said web hoster?

      Plus, you'll need a web hosting account that supports Zope (there are some, but less common).

      ermmmm that's the same argument twice. There are plenty of Zope hosts out there (although not on every street corner like static page or PHP hosting are) - go talk to George at Zettai!. You'll get enough for this kind of site for $60/year.

      Zope + Plone are great, albeit huge software products, but this is definitely not for the uninitiated nor a techno illiterate user.

      Ooh look - my troll-o-meter just bent out of shape. Once installed, Plone is simple to operate (and a simple install takes about 10 minutes). As anyone who's actually used it will be able to tell you.

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

    12. Re:Plone by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Ooh look - my troll-o-meter just bent out of shape. Once installed, Plone is simple to operate (and a simple install takes about 10 minutes). As anyone who's actually used it will be able to tell you.

      The trouble is upgrades. Without knowing much about Zope or Plone internals, I'll still bet $5 that there will, at some point in the next few years, be a security problem with Zope or Plone that needs fixing. Mom's not going to fix it.

      From this perspective, a dynamic website is the give that keeps on costing. Now if somebody offers a Plone service, that might be a good solution, but like others have said TypePad or .Mac fill the niche already.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    13. Re:Plone by jimmyharris · · Score: 1

      If you read the page you linked to, you'll find out why:

      Most current browsers don't handle the application/xhtml+xml MIME type correctly, so you'll need to make provisions for serving up your XHTML the old-fashioned way (as text/html) to these browsers. (The list of non-XHTML-aware browsers includes Internet Explorer 6 for Windows, so it's not as if you can skip this step.) If your pages are dynamically generated, you can alter the Content-type programmatically. If you're serving up static files, you'll need to resort to mod_rewrite or a similar solution. More on this in a minute, too.

  20. Write it yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all you need is a few simple functions, then why don't you write it yourself?

    Not only won't you have to deal with 39'514 features that will only be there to confuse them, but you'll be able to add that 39'515:th that your parents want but won't be available until "the next version".

    Nothing beats having full control over the tools you're working with...

  21. You gunna pay for it forever? by Kris_J · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Buying someone a service (or a pet) as a gift is, well, stupid is the most positive thing I can think of. Don't buy people things that need money fed into them forever.

    1. Re:You gunna pay for it forever? by MarkJensen · · Score: 5, Funny
      Don't buy people things that need money fed into them forever.

      Like a computer?

    2. Re:You gunna pay for it forever? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      Buying someone a service (or a pet) as a gift is, well, stupid is the most positive thing I can think of

      If after a year, the recipient doesn't feel like keeping up the site, they have still had a year out of it. If they do keep it up, they've recieved a year for free. How are either of these stupid?

      A pet is bad, unless you know the person wants it, because you can't just abandon it (without being an asshole), like you can with a website.

    3. Re:You gunna pay for it forever? by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      Don't buy people things that need money fed into them forever.
      Like a computer?
      Yup, I'd include that on the list. Even a pre-paid mobile phone pack is not something I'd buy as a surprise.
    4. Re:You gunna pay for it forever? by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      If after a year, the recipient doesn't feel like keeping up the site, they have still had a year out of it. If they do keep it up, they've recieved a year for free. How are either of these stupid?
      So long as you're paying up front for a whole year, there aren't any extra costs that could suddenly appear and you won't get upset if it doesn't get used after the first month, then I guess it's your money to risk.
    5. Re:You gunna pay for it forever? by jafac · · Score: 1

      Don't buy people things that need money fed into them forever.

      Like a computer?


      . . . or a CAR?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    6. Re:You gunna pay for it forever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      website and pet are totaly diffrent. It's closer to buying someone a magazine subscription, if they don't like it goes away after a year. Pets don't just 'go way'... unless it's a dog, I heard their good eating if ya get them young.

    7. Re:You gunna pay for it forever? by nolife · · Score: 1

      Don't buy people things that need money fed into them forever.

      Glad your not my parent. What do you suggest? Jewerly, and clothes? That would get old real quick.

      Damn, Kris got our name in the family christmas pool again this year, looks like another picture frame or a vase.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    8. Re:You gunna pay for it forever? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Get them cash instead "...it's the gift that keeps on going!" - quote from The Red Green Show

    9. Re:You gunna pay for it forever? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Well, as an example I bought my mother a model Humvee for a Mother's day some years back. She has since created a collection of hundreds of H1 models. I've pitched in on video cards for friends, DVDs are an easy way out but if you pick the right ones they can received well. A sewing machine for a birthday just before Christmas, which in turn was used to make Christmas gifts for other people. A few Monopoly sets for someone who collects them. One year I gave out heaps of Swatches, including some very limited edition sets. Fairly interesting stuff on the whole.

  22. Zope by The+Munger · · Score: 4, Informative

    Zope is a very powerful, yet friendly content management system. If you ever get beyond the basics of a bunch of text and images, it allows Python scripts. Zope is written using Python. Everything I've seen about it seems pretty nice, and I haven't heard a bad word against it.

    --
    Refuse to make a statement in your sig!
    1. Re:Zope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding - this is to be for a family site for technophobes. Hey, I'm a python nut, but I would never wish Zope upon anyone who isn't already a master of the language, and has oodles of time to sift through inpenetrable code.

      Seriously - they'd be better off taught how to use Macro Assembler.

    2. Re:Zope by DougJohnson · · Score: 0

      I've got a few bad words for it. First of all its interface is terrible, and extremely hard to customize. For instance you can't really just write an HTML page and upload it and hope it will work (except in special circumstances) I've never seen a photo-album plug in, and I expect one would be terriblely difficult. Simple scripting is difficult. I wanted to add a simple Python script to a zope site, and there was almost no way to do it. Basically, without a GREAT deal of learning curve, zope is only good for small businesses that want to have some of their emplyee's document what they're researching online. However, this is based only on one users perspective, I'm sure lots of you are much better at it, but it's certainly not intuitive or easy or something that I would want my mother trying to figure out (and she's got her Masters Degree in CS)

    3. Re:Zope by kurosawdust · · Score: 1
      FUCK Zope.

      Actually, I've never used it myself; just trying to show you that there are no absolutes, my friend...

    4. Re:Zope by Bigbiff · · Score: 1

      Try adding Plone to Zope.

      --
      Bigbiff http://www.exxtreme-linux.org
    5. Re:Zope by SlightOverdose · · Score: 1

      > First of all its interface is terrible, and extremely hard to customize

      Plone, CMF, CE ..... along with thousands of others. Need I say more?

    6. Re:Zope by SlightOverdose · · Score: 4, Informative

      (woops hit submit by mistake)

      > First of all its interface is terrible, and extremely hard to customize

      Plone, CMF, CE ..... along with thousands of others. Need I say more?

      > For instance you can't really just write an HTML page and upload it and hope it will work

      Uh... yes you can. And when using a CMF based solution, it automaticall renders it using the default template and stylesheet.

      > I've never seen a photo-album plug in, and I expect one would be terriblely difficult

      A quick google search turned up quite a few. And if their wasn't, it would be trivial to whip one up in an hour or two.

      > Simple scripting is difficult. I wanted to add a simple Python script to a zope site, and there was almost no way to do it

      Python scripting is pathetically simple- My Mom could do it. To add a python script, just... add a python script from the content type menu. I dont see how that could be considered hard.

      Overall, I think your post is just a big Troll. IMHO Zope is, by far, the most powerfull solution for, well, anything to do with a website. ZPT Leaves ASP and JSP in the dust, and is trivially easy to use. I've trained several people how to use it in a matter of hours.

    7. Re:Zope by the_rev_matt · · Score: 4, Informative
      Zope is extremely powerful and flexible. Zope is an application server, it is not the complete solution on it's own. Your best bet for what you want to do is to use zope hosting someplace (I've used hurrah in the past and currently use Zettai, both are great) and get them to install (or do it yourself if you are comfortable with that) either Content Management Framework or plone and add the photo album tool and a blog tool (there are at least three). CMF/Plone provide a very user friendly interface for managing documents, photos, files, etc etc. Plone is built on CMF and basically adds more complex functionality to CMF. You can probably do just fine with the core CMF.


      Rolling your own blog tool with BlogFace is pretty straightforward, or you can use one of the custom blog tools (CoreBlog, PABlog*, or CMF WebLog). For a very simplistic blog, you can just use the built in "news" tool.


      *I wrote and maintain PABlog, I like it obviously. It doesn't currently work with Plone, CMF WebLog only works with Plone. CoreBlog is the most flexible of the three, as it runs on pure Zope, CMF, or Plone.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    8. Re:Zope by The+Munger · · Score: 1

      Looking back at the sites I've seen that use Zope, all of them are using Plone as well. I guess that's more what I had in mind when I first posted.

      --
      Refuse to make a statement in your sig!
    9. Re:Zope by MartinB · · Score: 1

      Much of what you say is true... only if you're building on the raw app server (remember, Zope is an application server capable of many things, not an 'out of the box CMS'), rather than using one of the many capable CMS applications that sit on top of it.

      In particular, though, I have an argument with:

      I've never seen a photo-album plug in

      *cough*CMFPhoto*cough* Very, very nice. You just upload photos into a folder with ftp, webdav or just via an HTTP form, and it handles indexing, thumbnailing (via Python Imaging Library or Imagemagick), templating and so on. There's a version which plays very nicely with Plone, and one which doesn't need the CMF API.

      Zope has many prebuilt applications and CMS frameworks, while the core app server takes care of all the hard stuff like version control and authentication. I've set up sites for friends, relatives and non-technical co-workers based on Plone, and it's cake.

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

    10. Re:Zope by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      Zope has got to be the best looking web technology out there, killed by lack of documentation. I've fiddled with quite a bit but, frankly, I don't have the time or inclination to always be using the source as API reference.

      I've canned it after two months.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    11. Re:Zope by dublin · · Score: 1

      Zope is awesome in its potential, Hellish in its reality. All geeks are impressed with Zope's abilities. But very few even of that group are capable or willing to put up with its inane complexities. I've wasted *way* too much time trying to get Zope to do anything useful, and have nothing to show for it.

      Blosxom, on the other hand is dead easy to install "a working blog in fifteen minutes or your money back..." and has plug-ins to handle things like the image management side of things.

      On an open source software pain-in-the-butt scale of 1 to 10, Zope is a 9, Blosxom is a 2.

      Blosxom is no panacea, but if you just want a blog, it's orders of magnitude easier than Movable Type, Zope, and their ilk, and with plug-ins, it offers similar functionality. My problem with both MT and Zope is that they require a very seriously high-maintenance commitment. Try Blosxom first - if it turns out you don't like it, at least you won't have wasted any effort at all compared to the others....

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    12. Re:Zope by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      how will Zope and Plone affect my box's resources?

      I am interested in it but am concerned that it can slow down my box (like some *Nuke sites can).

    13. Re:Zope by supersmike · · Score: 1
      I've canned it after two months.

      Ditto here. Without a doubt, it's very cool stuff... if you're into Python. I bought two books on Zope and still wasn't as comfortable with it as I should have been. Maybe I'm just stupid.

    14. Re:Zope by St.+Vitus · · Score: 1

      If you've ever actually used Zope, you'd know that it's a pretty inappropriate suggestion for what the OP is looking for. What makes you think "computer illiterate" and "Python scripts" go well together?

    15. Re:Zope by nhavar · · Score: 1

      I'm by no means an experienced ZOPE user but I got ZOPE/CMF/CMFBoard up and running in about 45 minutes. There was nothing insanely complicated about setting it up. Then I set up a webfolder to be able to drop content in through explorer.

      Alot of the setup issues you might see could be curtailed by using a known ZOPE host. They've already taken all the steps to get the products set up and then you just have to worry about getting content up and maybe customizing some templates.

      Plone is an excellent package to get the majority of what you need in a neat tidy install with little to no setup required. Plus unlike ZOPE/CMF Plone uses XHTML/CSS and has good localization.

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    16. Re:Zope by kervel · · Score: 1

      i don't agree totally for deploying zope/cmf/plone with only existing components. Installing additional CMF components is very easy if you know the QuickInstaller tool, which is not in the standard plone distribution (maybe it is in the new 2.0 one, don't know)

      developing for zope/cmf is something different. first of all i don't like the security model at all (it is a pain to work with, and it makes using existing python modules in restricted mode impossible, but i heard this is going to be fixed in zope 3).
      secondly zope/cmf is a fairly complex design to understand, and the sometimes non-evident method names (parent of an object is object.aq_parent) don't help. There are also a lot of unwritten rules (but i'm not really experienced yet, so i could be wrong here), and a lot of cool functionality is only available as a 3rd party module (like filesystem-based ZODB, and Epoz WYSIWYG editor that works also in mozilla)

      but now that i discovered archetypes and its excellent tutorial, it is a lot easier to develop for zope/cmf/plone.

      i'd say zope/cmf/plone has a lot of potential, but it isn't ready yet. i'm looking forward to zope3

  23. .Mac is definitely the way to go by iliketrash · · Score: 1

    Apple's dotmac (www.mac.com) is AFAIK hands down the best way to go. It is tightly integrated with the "iApps" and the OS itself, with the user's site appearing as a hard disk on the desktop so that it can, in addition to be a personal web site, be used for backups and public folders etc. Publishing selected photos from iPhoto, for example, is just a couple of clicks.

    1. Re:.Mac is definitely the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. .Mac is the best solution here. If he didn't post it, I would have. This is also the best solution because Macs are computer illiterate people friendly, which is what your parents should have anyway. Right now I am in the process of trying to convince my mom to get a 17" or 20" iMac, but an eMac is also quite nice. Lotza power, and no M$ tax.

    2. Re:.Mac is definitely the way to go by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Mod this as redundant if you want.

      I agree that .mac is an ideal solution, except for the implicit requirement that the solution be cheap of free. Why else would someone give a website as a present unless they were low on funds and not good with macaroni and glitter? I doubt the original article poster could afford to give them a mac, although if they already own one, it's an option.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  24. if you are made of money... by TedTschopp · · Score: 4, Informative

    Macromedia Contribute is right up your alley. $99 last time I checked. And very idiot proof.

    Check it out

    --
    Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    1. Re:if you are made of money... by cleverhandle · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. Contribute isn't going to give you the whole PHP-shebang of blogs, forums, private messages, newsfeeds, and coffee-makers. But for making basic web pages, it's dead simple. You can set up templates for them to use as well - photo album pages for specific topics would be sensible.

      Very, very easy.

    2. Re:if you are made of money... by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      I have heard of some annoying bugs in version 2 of Contribute. Forums seem to say to keep using version 1.

      I am not sure if they have patched version 2 yet.

      If you use Dreamweaver to set up websites, then Contribute makes a lot of sense.

  25. That's neat, but.... by thewiz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will they actually use/update it?

    Too many websites go into the bit-bucket simply because it's no longer "fun" or becomes too much work to manage. If your parents are really interested in having their own site, go for it! I'd recommend getting them a free website to start then move them to a larger setup when the time comes.

    Don't forget to wrap it in continuous feed printer paper and use a ribbon cable for the bow!

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:That's neat, but.... by hao2lian · · Score: 1

      Probably more for private sharing than public, news, etc. blogs.

      --
      Pelé!
  26. do it yourself? by jester42 · · Score: 1

    Why not just do it yourself? That would also bring some meaning to the word 'gift' rather than just taking some code, putting it on some server and calling that a gift.

    And as long as you're just talking about a blog and a simple gallery, that should really be not too hard. If you already know - for example - php or perl, this should be an easy job for you. If you don't, this is YOUR chance to pick up some skills.

    1. Re:do it yourself? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I considered a similar task once. My dad's birthday was a couple of months off and I was bored enough to write a rudimentary accounting system (he was using pen and paper at the time so it should have been easy to make something easier to use.)

      Unfortunately before I got half way in, he was no longer doing the work which would have necessitated the site.

      Then there's another case where we've bought domain names for people and put up basic sites just to see the site go disused. One of those guys is now an enemy so we're considering retasking the site as a big public insult.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  27. try by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    try plone

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  28. Been there... by Chodak · · Score: 1

    My poor mother has a minimal (but still better than many's) understanding of computers. She has been using a Wintel machine for years, and has given in to much of the anti-Apple propaganda. I, personally, have never owned a Mac, but I bought an iMac for her birthday recently for the sole purpose of her setting up and updating a website. I knew that learning HTML was NOT an option, as she is just not suited to programming. (What is is with doctors and computer illiteracy? :) Anyway, it's coming along great, and hopefully she'll have it ready to go up soon so I can get her some web hosting... I guess the point is... Macs are easy for newbies.

    1. Re:Been there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What is is with doctors and computer illiteracy?

      All their brain cells have already been used up by med school.

    2. Re:Been there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is is with teachers and computer illiteracy?

      They never had too many brain cells to begin with, and those few were used up in high school.

  29. Well... by iamdrscience · · Score: 0

    Interestingly enough my brother started writing an application with PHP/MySQL a little while ago that does just that. I believe he has a version of it up and running for himself and a couple of his friends. It's not very polished and as such he hasn't posted code for it anywhere yet so I guess my posting this doesn't really help anyone, but it's interesting nonetheless.

    Maybe I'll encourage him to finish up a beta and put it on Source Forge. I don't want to post a link to his app here though because I don't want to have to deal with you people potentially killing my server (running off a cable connection).

    1. Re:Well... by iamdrscience · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Interestingly enough, I'm an idiot, I didn't read all of the posting before I posted the parent. What my brother made was a web app allowing people to post and manage gift lists (i.e. christmas/birthday gift lists).

      Sorry, I'm stupid!

  30. Get them to change their name to 404 by corebreech · · Score: 4, Funny

    Then make up a URL and tell them it's their new home page.

    (and that if they want to change it that they'll have to wait till next X-mas.)

    1. Re:Get them to change their name to 404 by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 1

      Especially if you tell them their address is http://www.homestarrunner.com/404. It evens comes with a free picture of a loving family scene.

    2. Re:Get them to change their name to 404 by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Which is all fine and dandy till sitefinder rears its ugly head again.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  31. When you can't find software that fits your needs by daddymac · · Score: 1
    Write your own blog/photo-album thing-a-ma-jigger. It's guaranteed to have all the features your family needs, and be easy to use for people who are computer illiterate. You will know this, because you will design the features and interface yourself.

    Most of what you want is probably already written in perl somewhere else anyway, you can just pick out the pieces you want and put them together.

    And, it will totally come from the heart, since YOU made it! Parents love that.

    --
    If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
  32. Re:Your parents will hate you...NOT by Archfeld · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can think of nothing my mother would like more sort of me moving back home with the grandkids so she can have them everyday, in fact she'd prolly just have me ship the kids to her and the wife and I stay away....

    If the web site lets her see new pictures and print them, she'd giggle for weeks. The idea is fairly good I wonder if I could host somthing simple enough to allow the rest of the family to upload images, we've had lots of grandkids in the last 18 months. My grandmother can't use the VCR still but she can pop the memory stick from her camera into the printer we got her and her house is flooded with pictures or wee little ones doing cutsie things that only family members would appreciate or care to know about. The scary thought is getting busted for child porn for the shot of little jenny having her first bath or somthing like that...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  33. your one-stop shop by GreenBugsBunny · · Score: 2, Informative

    horde.org

    Gotta use the CVS code for photo album, etc. but it's pretty stable.

  34. WebGUI by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use WebGUI from PlainBlack Software. It uses Perl/MySQL/Apache.

    It is OpenSource, and very easy to use. It has WYSIWYG for those that don't know how to cut/paste. I suggest anyone looking at a CMS to take a look. It isn't perfect, but none really are.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:WebGUI by zzzmarcus · · Score: 1

      I second WebGUI. I've created close to a dozen sites using it--it's 100% customizable, yet works out of the box.

      It inlcudes, out of the box, forums, blogging capabilities, photo albums, uploads, forms and a myriad of other features.

      Setup isn't bad either--they've created a decent script to get you up and running and one instance of WebGUI can power as many sites as your server can handle.

      HIGHLY recommended.

    2. Re:WebGUI by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      I use WebGUI for exactly this purpose. I've got my wishlist on my personal site, blog a little and use the photo gallery. Once installed, it's really easy to use. The wyswyg editor allows anyone that can use word to even do quite a bit of layout.

      Try the demo at plainblacks site!

      --
      ---
  35. .Mac by shking · · Score: 1

    Apple's .Mac is pretty much exactly what you say you want, but you'll need a Macintosh to set it up for them

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  36. Me too. by slyckshoes · · Score: 1

    I'm doing the exact same thing. In fact, I just registered the domain a week ago. I'm using WordPress as the blogging software, although I haven't found anything good to use as the album software. I'm hoping I don't have to roll my own, but I will if it's necessary.

  37. Try Pivot by Dugsmyname · · Score: 3, Informative

    For my web site, I found that the easiest content management system is Pivot. A friend has also set up a site where his parents can post directly to his web site... It's "grandma proof" (once set up) and easy to maintain..

    1. Re:Try Pivot by kalinh · · Score: 1

      Whoa! Do you have any idea how poorly your site renders in mozilla firebird 0.7?

      I hope that's not Pivot's fault.

      --

      Metamuscle.com - News in the Iro

    2. Re:Try Pivot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DUDE! YOU MUST BE KIDDING

      I couldn't recomend anything you do for my family!

      Your desktop cam shows two major bummers!
      1. Windows messenger service with a spam popup.
      2. Aol instant messenger.
      3. Thieving from the net!

  38. Look around at all the perdy choices by Zapperlink · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.opensourcecms.com/

  39. Depends on what you want on there by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

    If it's just pictures and text that they'll put on there, any ole LiveJournal or Xanga account would be a good enough substitute of a "web page." Otherwise, why go through all the trouble of securing a domain, server, the works?

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  40. PHPNuke, Can't Stand It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I honestly don't understand what there is not to like about PHPNuke. I would agree that out of the box it may not be ideal but if you're willing to spend minimal time customizing it can be a great framework. I have a personal website that I recently moved over to PHPNuke and I couldn't be any happier with the results so far.

    1. Re:PHPNuke, Can't Stand It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAA phpnuke HHAHAHHAHHAA what a hemmoraging piece of shit system LOLOLOL HAHHAHAHAHA

  41. Dear Sir and/or Madame by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Funny
    It has come to our attention that you are discussing the creation of an online gift site. We are required to inform you that our client holds extensive patents on not only online gift sites but the discussion thereof. Please cease and desist immediately. Thank you for your compliance.

    Sincerely,

    Amazon.com Legal Department

  42. TypePad over Radio... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe try TypePad then, or any through the web editing environment. I think Userlands Radio is probably too complex for the average true technophobe.

    Or, go the other direction and give them a book for Christmas "101 Fun Web Projects with Macro Assembler"

  43. Excellent Solution by shakamojo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Moveable Type is an excellent solution. Very user friendly with excellent online documentation. It's also easy to set up! I'd totally recommend it, I too have set it up for a few folks that aren't all that computer savvy, and they've had no problem using it to blog. There's also their pay service Typepad that is even more newbie friendly and requires no setup at all! Either of these solutions will do what you need.

    1. Re:Excellent Solution by abhisarda · · Score: 1

      Hello,
      Could you help me setup movable type. I tried to set it up a few months ago but couldn't figure it all out. If you could provide your email id or website from where I can contact you, it would be nice.
      abhisarda
      Mail.

    2. Re:Excellent Solution by cabingirl · · Score: 1

      I love MT, but to be fair, it's really called Movable Type. There's even a FAQ about it.

      --
      I could kill you, sure, but I could only make you cry with these words
  44. OR, How about a gift for the Internet... by Houn · · Score: 1

    And keep them off it? I think the Internet Community would find it a WONDERFUL holiday gift to be spared yet another blog about mom's canned yams and dad's latest golf scores...

    *runs* :D

    --
    The longer I'm a member of the Human Race, the more I believe Apocalypse is a valid solution.
  45. Yet another waste of space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what the web needs, another worthless fam site. Tell ya what man, why don't you give us all a gift and fsck'n spare us!

  46. First advice: don't. by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

    I gave my family a vanity site in 1997. It was fun to set up, but then it got boring and then it sat, idle, while my youngest brother grew up. You have to be a little weird (like most of the slashdot crowd) and have a little time on your hands to maintain a personal web site. Most people aren't weird enough and/or don't have the time.

  47. The easiest solution by skinfitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you considered just getting them socks or chocolate?

    1. Re:The easiest solution by Exiler · · Score: 1

      Or chocolate socks?

      --
      Banaaaana!
    2. Re:The easiest solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes my underwear is chocolate.

    3. Re:The easiest solution by KiDas · · Score: 1

      hehehe.. I'm very lucky I wasn't reading this at the office.

      --

      A distinctive mark, characteristic, or sound indicating identity
  48. I tried this by Progoth · · Score: 1

    I tried this....I could never really find a good CMS though. my family loves The Gallery. they've posted over 500 images on their dial-up connection. their friends and relatives (hmm well I guess they're my relatives too) like having a guestbook to put stuff in, so that's a decent feature. I tried for a while on the CMS thing...considered a wiki...but I eventually gave up. they never used the calendar, so it's sitting there stagnant. oh well. good luck.

    1. Re:I tried this by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Ah, Gallery. I tried it and it punished my P-200 server by telling it to process so many pictures. I guess that's what I get from a budget solution. I use a simple self-made PHP script, IrfanView batch-makes the thumbnails, I copy the pics and thumbs onto the server with Samba (FTP would work as well, and both are better than having to use http upload, IMO), and call a script to put the new pics in MySQL.. Still got a lot to work on (add pics in album, change viewing order, comments), but it's served me well.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    2. Re:I tried this by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      The Gallery kicks ass. It was a little tedious to set up on my hosting provider's server (the creators seem to think everyone has root access to the server), but once its configured, using it couldn't be easier. Great for my semi-computer-illiterate family to post pictures with.

  49. Greymatter by sillydragon · · Score: 1

    Greymatter seems to be pretty easy to set up and use.

  50. Rethink this by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your parents are as computer-unsavvy as you claim, they will not use this. Maybe, with your help, a couple family photos and a minimal blurb of self-awareness "Hey, this is our website and it works!"

    After that, it will be as static as if it were etched in a stone tablet. Any updates will be done by you when you're visiting, you'll show them how to update the site, they'll nod and smile, and then it will be etched in stone again until you come back.

    Just go ahead and buy them a new clock or a DVD player or a warm blanket. Better than saddling them with something that will be perceived as a responsibility and continual drudgery.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Rethink this by malfunct · · Score: 1
      Drupal (I use this on my site) is actually pretty easy to use. You log in (most people understand that concept), click "create a story", fill out the web form with your cool stuff, and bam new webpage in your website. It automatically gets sorted and formatted and all that fun stuff. I really like it.

      The downside to this whole thing is that as of 4.1.0 of drupal there were still some large bugs that made it unusable in some ways. The photo module for instance is pretty poor. I like it because the underlying code is simple enough that I, even though I don't know php for the most part, am able to work around the issues with small code hacks.

      Version 4.3.0 is out now and I think its time for me to upgrade to see if any of the things that upset me are fixed. If drupal worked perfectly it would be a great solution for the type of site that the poster seems to want to set up. Lets hope they get to that point.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    2. Re:Rethink this by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      If your parents are as computer-unsavvy as you claim, they will not use this.

      "I'm doing this for my computer illiterate [parents|friend|neighbor|whoever]" is a typical story when someone is ashamed they don't know something already. I mean think about it: he's asking a technical question on a geek hive such as /. where everyone is expected to know everything there is to know about computers. So what is a guy to do if he wants some easy and simple setup?

      Asking: I need a CMS for some poor illiterate guy will result in: yes, go to this site, download this easy to use software, etc.

      Asking: I need this CMS system for myself, will most likely result in: yes, on debian change the .config file to... , modify a few apache modules to... after installing postgre+ and jdbc drivers do this...

      You get the idea...

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  51. Bad link by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

    Was the error in the link to drupal.org made on purpose ?

    Maybe they didn't want to slashdot this website before that some of us could discover this CMS :?

    --
    Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
  52. For the DIY'ers by Eberlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a fun and interesting project to come up with a blog-like set of scripts. There's a lot out there that do way more than you care for it to do, and there's always the satisfaction of having created one yourself.

    A few caveats, I suppose -- make sure you're up on security when it comes to scripting. The last thing you need is for a gift site to be defaced because you messed up on a SQL-injection vuln.

    Then there's the "idiot-proofing" portion where you have to come up with a coherent enough UI for the computer-unsavvy folks to work with on the backend. I decided I'd write my own and since it's for myself, I could get away with a not-so-friendly interface as long as the outside world could navigate through what they need to.

    I'm all for a DIY project -- you get to have a bit of fun (though some of it is tedious in debugging and fixing aesthetics) but it could present not only a gift for your family but also a bit of a mental gift for yourself having gone through it.

  53. PHPnuke ? by HansF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jeez, what is PHPnuke doing mentioned in this post?
    Phpnuke is "a news automated system specially designed to be used in Intranets and Internet. The Administrator has total control of his web site, registered users, and he will have in the hand a powerful assembly of tools to maintain an active and 100% interactive web site using databases."
    So it isn't a wiki, it isn't a CMS, and it certainly isn't a blog. It's an open source project loosely based on the /. concept.
    Bashing PHPnuke in this post sounds too stupid to be true, it's like bashing MySQL for not being a good word processor.

    --
    --> Insert Funny Sig Here
    1. Re:PHPnuke ? by MavEtJu · · Score: 4, Funny

      it's like bashing MySQL for not being a good word processor.

      Hah! Another piece of dirt I can throw at these mysql monkeys!

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    2. Re:PHPnuke ? by zBoD · · Score: 1

      Are you saying "the /. concept" is not a CMS? Come on it's articles, and a forum attached to these articles... nothing more.

      --
      BoD
    3. Re:PHPnuke ? by julesh · · Score: 1

      What is "a news automated system" if not an obscure and difficult to understand way of describing a CMS?

      It's an open source project loosely based on the /. concept

      I hate to point this out, but /. is very similar to most blogs I've read; they generally take the form of a chronologically ordered list of articles (sometimes separated out into topics) to which other people can often add comments, just like slashdot. Of course slashdot has article submission and comment moderation which most blogs don't have, but that just makes it an enhanced blog as far as I'm concerned. I'm fairly sure there are people out there using slashcode to run blogs.

    4. Re:PHPnuke ? by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

      So it isn't a wiki, it isn't a CMS, and it certainly isn't a blog?

      The term is "portal."

      It's not a true CMS, despite the fact that they claim to be one. In fact CMS is a vastly overused term.

      --
      bp
  54. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a big fat dork. Get them a real present.

  55. Re:.mac or not 2 Mac by 2ndRateSoul · · Score: 2, Interesting


    If they have a windows PC check out NeoPhoto; http://www.neophoto.com. Makes webpages quick. Very easy for novice users.

  56. .Mac by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
    If they're using a Mac, then .Mac is the best thing I can suggest. Publishing photos from iPhoto is a breeze, and Apple is even offering iBlog for free and $20 off of Macromedia Contribute right now to .Mac members (and Contribute is a great way to handle editing to people you may be less than excited about giving that type of access to). In all, a great package. Of course, $99/year for just web publishing is possibly cost-prohibitive, especially if your parents wouldn't be inclined to use the other features of the service.

    Now, if they don't use a Mac... well, I'm out of suggestions at that point. ;)

  57. Nice gift by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    Nice gift. Leave it to a slashbot to find a gift that makes some skank-ass tie look good.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  58. PHP Website by christianT · · Score: 1

    phpWebSite is fairly easy to use.

    1. Re:PHP Website by Rufosx · · Score: 1

      I've tried setting this up for non-geek types. It works, but you will need to give them very specific step-by-step instructions for each task they'll want to perform.

  59. Where is Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, there are so many people recommending .Mac. Is there no easy to use Linux solution? Much to the dismay of many geek's hearts, this is why Linux is NOT ready for the Desktop. Apple gets it, Linux zealots do not.

    Bonus points for the first person (who as part of their gift idea) involves teaching the parents to compile/config their "easy to use" linux solution.

    LOL, troll me bitch!!!

  60. Website for Christmas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess. You probably hand out little toothbrushes on Halloween.

  61. Cart before the horse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since your family is computer illiterate, why not a copy of Internet for Dummies this year, and let them make their own damn sites next year?

  62. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Legit goatse.cx links are so rare these days. This one's funny, and should be modded as such.

  63. Minor pluggage? by Raxxon · · Score: 1

    I've been fairly happy with pLog myself, it's PHP/MySQL based but it doesn't meet the requirements of what you're asking for just yet (unless you're using the CVS and a couple of items from the mailing list ;) ). We're working on getting things added in as fast as we can though.

    I can't really see any of the CMS/blog packages really handling what you're looking for unless you're going to get webspace somewhere and maintain it yourself with them just having access to occasionally add entries/pics... :( Of course you could cheat a bit and give them LiveJournal accounts and then setup their blogging utils to let them post things... ;) (another feature that pLog is working on.. heh)

  64. Dot Mac by Zoop · · Score: 1

    Seriously, that's the target audience of Apple's .Mac. It integrates with the apps that they already use on the machine.

    Since iBlog comes with it, you get a blog of sorts, too.

    I'm not a fan of it, and use Moveable Type for mine, but as you say, I'm a geek and not the target audience.

    I know, Apples are expensive, blah blah blah.

  65. Re:.mac or not 2 Mac by 2ndRateSoul · · Score: 1

    That should be http://www.neophoto.com.

  66. Give them a better SON!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I'm sure they would want a son that won't give them such a crappy christmas present hehehehehe

  67. A bit off topic but ... by SweenyTod · · Score: 2, Funny

    I gave my wife a domain name + website as a gift some years ago (http://www.trickenzie.com/). She wasn't my wife then, we were just seeing each other.

    When I told her about her new email addresses (as many as she wants!) and website she just looked at me and said "You bought me a domain name?"

    "Yeah."

    This was followed by that utter dead silence men know only so well - it was a pivitol moment...

    Then she smiled and nodded. Now she wouldn't live without it.

    A geek love story, presented to you by the letters C and O and M.

    --
    Alas gallinaceas de urbe bovis volo
    1. Re:A bit off topic but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good God, man! Change the background on that website!

      I read: "G'day, I'm Trickenzie, usually shortened to Trickie" as "G'day, I'm Trickenzie, usually shortened to Trickle"

  68. How to set up a gift website for monkeys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm considering giving my pet monkeys their very own website for the holidays. However, it's harder than anticipated to find any type of Content Management System whose intended audience is a computer illiterate primate. I personally use Drupal for content and Gallery for photo albums, and frankly can't stand PHPNuke. The only features required would be a blog of sorts and a photo album. I can't be the first one in this predicament, can I?


    Moral: Not all people are destined to create web pages.

    (or, Just because something can be seen by everybody doesn't mean it can be created by everybody. Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it appears.)

  69. Plone could work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    An out of the box experience is important. You can register with Zettai.net or iMeme.net and get root access and Plone installed. http://plone.org/ is the out-of-the-box look and feel. you can customize it, http://plone.org/about/sites -- why Plone? Because its easy, large community and fully standards compliant.

  70. Go do the Mac thang by rjung2k · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Like others have said, a Mac and a .mac account will do everything you want, and more. One-click publishing of photos, idiot-proof web blogging, plus the benefits of using a Mac over a Wintel PC. :-)

    The upfront costs are higher, but think of that as the time you save not having to walk them through the steps every few weeks.

  71. If a gift requires any kind of "Management System" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then it's a lame gift idea. How about giving your parents something they might actually want, eh?

  72. They're going to have to learn SOMETHING... by Shoten · · Score: 2

    Almost any functionality of any form requires learning to some degree. A radio-controlled car, a new stereo, a new cell phone. To expect something like this to require no learning curve at all is unrealistic. Also, most people take some interest in learning things (although I know I'm speaking for people I've never met here). With that in mind, could you not use TikiWiki and tune it a bit to strip off the goodies they won't use.

    Another thing you can do to minimize the learning curve is document the features they'll be using, on their own site. That way they don't have to know anything but the url...they can see help on the front page, and utilize it.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  73. Re:DON'T SHOOT ME, BUT WHAT ABOUT FRONT PAGE? by Citizen+Gold · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, I don't see any reason here not to shoot.

    1. You suggested Frontpage.
    2. Your suggestions are off topic (Frontpage is _not_ a CMS.)
    3. You suggested Frontpage.
    4. You suggested MSWord!

    On a more serious note though. Typically a CMS can be posted too/edited from anywhere. Relying on a particular piece of software would restrict where you can edit the site from. Makes it a little more difficult to post to the site on holiday etc.

  74. Yep by MacFury · · Score: 1
    Nothing beats having full control over the tools you're working with...

    I wish I had total control over my coworkers. How did you manage that? ;-)

    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a whip and a carrot on a stick of course.

  75. Shoutbox for Christmas by djtripp · · Score: 1

    Shout box is a nice little php/sql dealy-bob that allows just about any one to post anything. It's quick and dirty, just like Santa. shoutbox.sourceforge.net

    --
    "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
  76. After hours of searching... by delfstrom · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've looked into all sorts of content management systems and have tried many of them out.

    You can see my review of CMSs as a presentation (PDF) here.

    Unfortunately just about all open source CMSs leave a lot to be desired in terms of out-of-the-box architecture and usability.

    • Don't use Plone/Zope, Drupal, Slashcode, etc. etc.
    • Macromedia Contribute, though $$$$, might be a good solution because you can lock them out from messing around with the site, but there is still a learning curve for newbies
    • Good blogging software like MT mentioned earlier would work well, along with something like Gallery for photos.
    • Quite frankly, Mac.com seems to be the best out there. It's really easy to use. Of course, you need a Macintosh to make it worthwhile, but it really seems to be a good solution for what you're looking for.
    1. Re:After hours of searching... by delfstrom · · Score: 1

      Zope is great. Plone is pretty good. But not for this case. The problem is usability for the end user, especially since the writer asking slashdot said that the intended audience is a computer illiterate family. Plone is still not usable enough that audience. Not without more work.

    2. Re:After hours of searching... by CyberSlugGump · · Score: 1

      Hours? Wow--the things people will do to earn slashdot Karma ;-)

    3. Re:After hours of searching... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it *is* usable for computer illiterates. If you use a hosting provider such as Python-hosting.com or Ingeniweb.com, they'll install Plone for you and it will be ready to use when you get your account. You'll never have to know what Zope or Python is ... The main problem with Zope/Plone is that they use soooo much ressources ... There are just way too many layers in there ! But hey, it's your hosting provider's problem, not yours :-)

    4. Re:After hours of searching... by rbb · · Score: 1
      Someone please explain why this troll got a +4 Informative at the time of my posting. This "review of CMSs" is pathetic.
      • The author takes generalizing to an extreme in his advantages/disadvantages section.
      • He's hopelessly biased towards Zope (for apparently no reason other than "I have all the books!")
      • He has no argumentation on why people should not be using Plone, Drupal, Slashcode etc. Even worse, the only place he even mentions these CMSs is on page 27 with URLs to the project as his only comment.
      --
      In God We Trust, Others We Monitor
    5. Re:After hours of searching... by Dylan2000 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add my system, Meddling Kids, to that list. I guess it would be most similar to mac.com in that it's web-based, with no downloading or installation required and it comes with a domain name, email addresses and hosting.

      The templates are much nicer than the average blogging site and it was designed for the computer illiterate. There's a one week free trial, too.

      --
      Build your own website - full service homepage system your m
    6. Re:After hours of searching... by delfstrom · · Score: 1

      The audience for that presentation was for a group of webmasters at a public academic institution, many of whom used dreamweaver or frontpage to maintain departmental websites, but were looking at alternatives. For the most part universities have been choosing proprietary closed-source CMSs or doing it in house. The intent was to get them to consider open source, and give them some generalizations especially with respect to the program architecture.

    7. Re:After hours of searching... by rbb · · Score: 1

      I wasn't complaining about the topic of your presentation, nor the intents you may have had with it, but calling it a "review of CMSs" was misleading.

      --
      In God We Trust, Others We Monitor
  77. movabletype.org by the+web · · Score: 1

    Try MT, it is a blog of sorts. I've been using it for a number of weeks now, and know people who've used it for years. Nothing but satisfaction.

    Past initial set up, The admin is very easy and clear to use. Adding entries and managing them is simple.

    It has plenty of third party support as well. From comment spam plugins to remote management utilities. I know nothing about setting up a database/tables, and with a little coaxing from associates, was able to set it up for the most part, all by my lonesome.

    It supports any variety of databases including mysql, requires perl. For more accurate information go to the site.

    Movable Type

    --
    __
    Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
    1. Re:movabletype.org by chrome · · Score: 1

      Definitely Movable Type. I use it for my site, and I also have WebDav set up on it so I can drop photos into my gallery application. It makes maintaining the site a breeze.

      No editing HTML, no command line monkeying with images, just drag and drop.

      For someone who is lazy such as myself, it makes life a breeze.

  78. Online happiness by yintercept · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree, giving someone a one size fit all content management program with the idea that it will make their online experience a wonderland is absurd. I will just lead to a lot of work and unhappiness.

    Personally, I think people are better off playing with a variety of programs. For example, you might try an online gallery with Yahoo, oFoto or those types of programs. Geocities pages are easy to maintain. There's tons of multiuser genealogy sites. If a person wants a simple home page for articles, I would just stick with one of the big blog companies.

    The diversity approach gives people a chance to learn what they like and don't like. Online happiness comes from playing with different things. Instead of getting something large in scope, I would look to smaller things.

    For example, there is a new railroad tycoon program out, I was thinking of getting that for the paternal unit. I wrote a PHP program so the maternal unit could publish her philosophical thoughts. Even an extremely limited scope web page for parents takes a great deal of work.

  79. Re:Your parents will hate you...NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Forget the website. You need a copy of Strunk & White's "Elements of Style" for Christmas. Look up the phrase "run-on sentence."

  80. CityDesk by JacobO · · Score: 3, Informative

    You should take a look at Fog Creek's CityDesk. Their "starter edition" is free and lets you publish sites of up to 50 pages.

    CityDesk

  81. smugmug - good enough for Howard Dean & my mo by onethumb · · Score: 1

    We used to use Gallery for our photos, but while it's easily the best installable package around, and much better than lots of online photo sharing places, we eventually outgrew it. It wasn't easy enough for my computer-illiterate family members, and it wasn't powerful or stylish enough for those who were literate.

    Rather than look elsewhere, I built my own. It's now a thriving service all it's own, and our mantras are Easy and Style. Every decision we make is governed by those two directives, and it's paying off. We have soccer moms, Grandmas, servicement stationed in Iraq, and many many more using the service. Howard Dean runs his presidential campaign using smugmug.

    The downside is that it's not free. You get a week to try it out free, but then it's $30/year (not month!). That gets you a fantastic, stylish, and easy-to use photo sharing site with unlimited storage. Best of all, it can be customized to link seamlessly with other websites, such as your blog or whatever you'd like.

    Howard Dean's presidential campaign: http://photos.deanforamerica.com/

    My wife's photography business: http://emphoto.smugmug.com/

    We are, of course, Linux, Mac OS X, and yes, even Windows friendly. :)

    Check it out. We're small, but profitable, and I promise we have the best customer service on the net. We always will.

    --
    my smug mug is on smugmug ... is yours?
  82. Mod parent UP, not down...morons. by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    I agree. Not only will they get a easy way to upload photos- but they'll get a place to publish calendars others can subscribe to(not just iCal users either- Netscape w/Calendaring plugin for one), and a place to back up stuff like their bookmarks, address book, etc.

    OS 9/X have a rather strong shareware and freeware market- lots of little programs out there to enhance various aspects, and .Mac is no exception.

    Of course, it does mean buying them a Mac if they don't have one- but one of those gumdrop flat panel units should be pretty inexpensive these days with the various larger sized screens it's come out with(21"...my GOD! It defies -physics-! First example of a Steve Reality Distortion Field in an Apple product!)

  83. e107 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has to be simple right? work out of the box right?

    Plone is great, it's a spiffed up version of CMF for zope, great if you need fairly complex things and don't mind coding.

    Zope is as bare bones as it gets OOTB.

    I suggest you check out e107 at http://www.e107.org, Easy to post news, and very very easy to install version of coppermine available at http://www.e107coders.org.

  84. Try PhPGedView for the Family Tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a look at phpGedView for a nice open source php based website that can show off your family tree. All it takes is a standard GEDCOM and you are off running.

    1. Re:Try PhPGedView for the Family Tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      works for me

  85. Photo archive running on safe_mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was running a pretty cool Gallery (http://gallery.menalto.com) and suddenly the admin activated safe_mode. Result: my gallery isnt working anymore. I tried to install a lot of php based gallery found on sourceforge, but the results are the same. safe_mode seems to be a pain in the ass for any gallery archive available on the net. do you have any ideas or URL to help me? btw, i'm not very good at coding php.. thanks for your support

    1. Re:Photo archive running on safe_mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      excellent question, i currently have the same problem!

    2. Re:Photo archive running on safe_mode by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      If anyone's still reading this, try Ansel + patches I've made to it. Email me or leave a comment to get the patches...keep meaning to put 'em up somewhere.

  86. Try SharedInk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give SharedInk a try. It is very easy to use and it allows the whole family to work on photo albums together online. Also, you can turn your web pages into a really nice looking hardcover coffee table book.

  87. TRY e107 by PsYcOBoRg · · Score: 0

    It rocks, has support of way over 1000 users. and is rock solid, and Very easy to use.

    you can pick up a free copy at http://www.e107.org

    it has everything you wanted in your site, blog, news, photogalery, chat, and alot more.

    --
    To err is human, to really screw things up, you need a robot.
  88. This one is perfect for by dethkultur · · Score: 1

    I use it, its easy. No database even, all point and click and wysiwyg. CMSimple I'm a user, I use it on my IM Bot site.

  89. Live Journal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Live Journal, why reinvent the wheel?

  90. Uploading via web page by 0x20 · · Score: 1

    The problem with web-based CMSs is uploading. HTML form-based uploading is no fun when you want to post a few hundred photos from a session for somebody to review or whatever. And people (especially clients and computer-illiterate families) don't want to use FTP. What people want is a cross-platform, drag-and-drop upload system, seamlessly incorporated into the CMS, that'll allow them to manage files on the website as though they were part of the local file system, using OS-native dialogs and such. And I know it can be done with WebDAV, but I haven't yet seen a CMS yet that has this feature. Does anybody know of one?

    1. Re:Uploading via web page by jafac · · Score: 1

      .Mac is WebDAV-based.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    2. Re:Uploading via web page by Shutter_BC · · Score: 1

      You're right that this is a great way to go. Trust me, there are some CMS companies picking up on this. Due to the fact that many of these organizations are going for the private sector first, you may not see a public incarnation of the technology right off the bat.

      Anyone know of public domain implementations of WebDAV? I'm sure it's on the horizon if not already there...

    3. Re:Uploading via web page by 0x20 · · Score: 1

      I know, and I think .Mac is great, but it's not cross-platform.

    4. Re:Uploading via web page by MartinB · · Score: 1

      Zope has WebDAV out of the box - any Zope-based CMS will therefore have the capability.

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

  91. PyCS && PyDS by Roberto · · Score: 1

    You can set both up on a server, very nice to use, fully web based.

    I use them for my site: www.pycs.net/lateral

    If you don't want to handle the hosting, the pycs guys give accounts for free.

  92. Homebase Anywhere by GRW · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have been using the Homebase Anywhere service from Axentra Corporation. They provide IMAP and webmail, 100 megs of web and storage space and your own portal page with webdav access. Photo albums are automatically generated by uploading photos and description files to your "Photos" directory. Other features include compatibility with Mozilla calendar, an LDAP capable address book, and an online web page generator. There is a free 60 day trial. Axentra also sells the Rumba Multifunction Server Appliance, which is a mini-ITX and Linux based internet gateway server which has all of the features of Homebase Anywhere.

  93. I know the CMS your looking for by ScurvyDawg · · Score: 1
  94. I like the idea by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

    alltohugh my parents would prolly have no clue of what to do with it : Or if they did : they would have no clue what use it could serve :) Guess they still don't wanna be convinced of the digital way of life : Hell, my dad is allready dead-excited when he sees me playing some oldies like Elevator Action ;) But, to get on subject : One CMS i find to be very handy and configurable for blogging is the freeware tool 'pivotlog' : get it at www.pivotlog.net Totally free and you don't need the (extra) MySQL databases to use this : afaik, it uses only PHP

  95. Check out These by natmsincome.com · · Score: 1

    Depends on what you want:

    The best CMS for actually making websites that I know of is Mambo on the other hand it sounds like you don't want that.

    If were going for simple I'd have to say I haven't found anything that better than Gallery for pictures. You then need to figure out if you want a Website or a Blog. I haven't used many blogs but you if you want easy webpages use a Wiki

    Hope you find what your looking for though.

  96. Re:DON'T SHOOT ME, BUT WHAT ABOUT FRONT PAGE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. FP makes the most god-awful bloated non-standard HTML.

  97. Personal Content Management by Fall+equinox · · Score: 1

    SiteStrux, http://www.sitestrux.com offers a personal website package. They do original graphic design, built into their simple, novice oriented content management system. Their program has both a Blog and Display gallery feature, among others. Their program is not open source, and you can't set it up on your own, so its probably not what your looking for. Nice CMS all the same.

  98. Weird, I'm in the same boat myself by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1
    Something I'm considering is setting up a Wiki for the in-laws; I figure the easy formatting and linking will be a godsend, and there's got to be a way to limit editing to just them, right? (Oh god -- awful random thought -- what happens when spammers find wikis? Jesus...)

    That said, my father-in-law may be technically inclined enough to be interested in pico + HTML for Dummies. Know your audience, I guess.

  99. .mac .mac .mac iBlog, Backup, Virex, iPhoto, iDisk by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Informative
    .mac is so seemless its absurd. With iDisk you almost cannot tell its a remote disk other than the speed. Everything about the user interface just makes it look like its part of the file system and FINDER that you know already. Panther takes it way beyond jaguar and light years beyong Goliath. its just so fast and robust now.

    .mac gives you iBlog software, backup software, iPhoto, and home page templates. Of these only the home page templates are primitive, but frankly you dont want to give illiterates to many choices. If they want more they can roll their own web pages.

    Also the .mac site also has other things like update software, sample tunes for your imovies and lots of stuff thats not just a collection of freebies but focused on assisting your mac in ways that are actually productive.

    No they dont have cgi, but you dont want that for your case anyhow.

    Dont say, well .mac is out of the question cause I dont have a mac or a free .mac site. for illiterates macs a re cheap compared to the training you would have to give these people to be as productive on any other computer. THROW the WIINDOWS machine on the trash and buy a used mac for them on e-bay--it's way cost effective.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  100. Ask Slashdot needs to go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're computer illiterate and you think a good present would be a website eh? You dumb fuck. Anyway, your bad judgement aside, I'm sure AOL Homepages is what you're looking for. Worst. Ask Slashdot. Ever.

  101. Typepad by madmaxx · · Score: 1

    Try Typepad ... it's a pay-for service, but it's damned simple to use. I was a second-round beta tester, and I found it one of the easiest web-publishing software out there, as did the hundreds of other beta-testers I talked with. It's an updated version of MoveableType (which is also very good), but simplified for the average shmoe. It even includes a handy 'layout' editor, which allows the sort of page customization most people want, without *any* understanding of how the stuff actually works. Everything is simple, grokable, and does what it can to hide the technical details. It even has nifty features that auto-link amazon images to your posts and stuff. Safe for the whole family.

    I've used most everything else over the last 10+ years: slashcode, phpnuke, pyblosxom, blosxom, moveabletype, citydesk, blogger ... and none of it was shmoe-worthy. It was all geek-worthy, but the many technical details dumbfounded the non-techs I know.

    Note, I run my sites using blosxom, ssh, vi, and make ... but then again, I'm not normal people.

    --
    mx
  102. check this company out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CSL, Inc. in Spokane has a very affordable solution, that is designed for the computer illiterate. All you need is a web browser, and you can maintain the content, upload images and they are automatically put into thumbnails and displayed in an image gallery, etc.

    www.cslcorp.com

  103. What are your suggestions for an xperimented user? by romcabrera · · Score: 1

    I'm going to try a CMS, after playing a lot with Movable Type. What are your suggestions? Is Zope really the best? phpNuke really sucks? Thanx 4 your advice

  104. iBlog by blamanj · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...can be used without paying Apple for .mac. Some of us like a little more control over our domains.

    1. Re:iBlog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      whatever you say. I figure 99 dollars per year is cheap for a seamless headache free web site. Sue you can cobble together every feature on the .mac site. How much is that all worth to you and maintain? And as for control, well you can keep control on some other web site--thats not what the question was about. it was about how to set op a family web site for newbies.

    2. Re:iBlog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I figure 99 dollars per year is cheap for a seamless headache
      free web site."

      99 dollars per year for a free website?
      A seamless headache?

      No thanks.

  105. For consideration by Micah · · Score: 1

    On the topic of blogs, I've recently had a brainfart idea that's in my journal. I want to see an open source CMS as an Apache module in C!

    Linkage

    As for ease of use, it would certainly require a geek to set up, but after that I don't think it would be particularly difficult to use.

    I just think the current OSS CMSs fall short in some areas (performance being one) and this could really help.

  106. asd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because you like homepages doesn't mean your parents do.

  107. revitalize this field by ftide · · Score: 1

    "The only features required would be a blog of sorts and a photo album" It's also constant dialogue with the LAN/site administrator(s). I spoke with a local representative about setting up a registered site with blog and Web/CVS update abilities. The resident tech was hesitant to divulge information to me every step of the way despite my having prior volunteer relations at this facility. Understandable given network security. Not so understandable from the perspective of 1) I'm a contributing volunteer and have contributed code before. 2) I want to identify existing comm protocols like TCP/IP and proper session handling (that's not MS TCP, sorry folks). One primary goal is to get content delivery to patrons of this facility with known data sets of origin and delivery. They're running CITRIX/Windows 2000 with a Linux back office. Content management or the settling of processes and accounts for developers and organizations is a multi-step process arrayed or tiered across many departments. My math background says this is degrees of separation between ppl who make decisions (a.k.a. poltics) and comes heavily into play. Conversation on the table and off the record cannot be ignored even by the developer more interested in technology who wants to make a competitive product with collaborative inputs wherever a group decides they're needed yet this very developer shouldn't every time need to be the cog in the middle or broker or attache-type person who does all the thinking and engagement of a proposal. From my experience it centralizes and exposes too much of a developers hand. What we need are more pre-standardized, pre-certified work templates or codesuites that are partially a result of shared code and part in-house proprietary approaches.

  108. Here you go. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I built this last year for a quick demo for a job. This year I have it set up for my girlfriend's family. It is not quite where I want it, but......
    You will need Apache, perl, and CGI.pm.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  109. CityDesk by TheCodeFoundry · · Score: 2, Informative

    Joel on Software's company, FogCreek, makes a very friendly, easy to use content mgmt software package, named CityDesk.

    Very intuitive and easy to use...yet it is pretty powerful. Good for novice and knowledgeable users.

  110. I actually just got a surprise birthday site! by turnstyle · · Score: 3, Interesting
    By way of background, I make Andromeda which turns collections of MP3s into streaming sites.

    So... my g/f Amy, not at all a techie, secretly learned how to set up and use Andromeda, emailed my friends for suggested listening, and surprised me on my birthday with a fully set up music site. It was totally amazing!

    She even set up a fake Hotmail address so she could write me with tech support questions. Sneaky.

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    1. Re:I actually just got a surprise birthday site! by nerbas · · Score: 1

      Have a look at NetJuke - it's a very well GPL'ed streaming Jukebox for your mp3's.

      Better than Andromeda? Don't really know - but it's free...

      -nerbas.

    2. Re:I actually just got a surprise birthday site! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think andromeda is pretty damn cool. It's great (albeit expensive) jukebox software. But you always use slashdot posting to promote your damn software. Geeze.

    3. Re:I actually just got a surprise birthday site! by HL · · Score: 1
      She even set up a fake Hotmail address so she could write me with tech support questions.

      Oh, this could be interesting... (in reply...)

      Damn newbie! RTFM and STOP ASKING ME THOSE DAMN STUPID QUESTIONS!

      ooops...
    4. Re:I actually just got a surprise birthday site! by turnstyle · · Score: 1
      It creeped me out when she revealed that we had traded email, but that she had used a fake name.

      When I'm helping people that I don't know, I talk differently than I do when I'm helping friends.

      So, when she told me that she had emailed me tech support questions as "Jane Grey" (a mistaken reference to X-Men's Jean Grey) and I went and re-read the emails that I had sent to "Jane Gray" it was pretty weird.

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    5. Re:I actually just got a surprise birthday site! by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      Do you know of Is something equivalent for streaming video?

  111. Post (not php) Nuke by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

    With the Pagesetter & Photoshare modules is pretty simple, if you set it up for them and remove all the extraneous stuff.

    Then they can just login and start making galleries and logs, pretty much just using a form and the nice little pagesetter online x-platorm wysiwyg.

    http://www.Postnuke.com

    Pagesetter & Photoshare: http://www.elfisk.dk

  112. PHPWebsite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    phpwebsite.appstate.edu

    Takes a little training, but not a whole lot... you could set up the layout and make it easy to add pages, get everything in place, then show them how to add photos and pages to their respective blogs.

    It's GPL'ed and free. :)

    1. Re:phpWebSite by dopeghost · · Score: 1

      as this is exactly what i was going to mention i second that.

      the backend of phpwebsite is nicely elegant, real simple. it also seems the choice for many 'computers are what you use to access the internet' blogger types.

      so if a teen girl who's pressing issues are more about sharing make-up tips than debugging php code can use it then it's probably gonna be a perfect choice for your parents.

      did i mention it's free/gpl?

      --
      This UID is 7651 digits too high to subjectively infer IQ from.
  113. Maybe tikiwiki is something for you... by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

    to manage of course, not your parents unless they are geeks or able to do CSM configuration.
    Don't forget to give them some flowers too, very important...

    http://tikiwiki.sourceforge.net/

  114. Re:What are your suggestions for an xperimented us by UnConeD · · Score: 1

    Zope/Plone is great for big businesses who have a dedicated server to spare with lots of RAM. For a hobbyist it's not good to start with, and you'll have trouble finding a cheap hosting solution for experimenting with.

    PHP-Nuke is good as long as you don't need to touch anything because it's a mess inside. Postnuke is much better than PHP-Nuke, but it still shares a lot of ideas with PHP-Nuke.

    MovableType is good if all you need is a simple blog. It does only a small set of things, but does them really well.

    Drupal is very extensible, simple design, has lots of contributed modules and a good community. It does lack some of the more finished detail stuff that other systems might have (e.g. MovableType does only a blog, but does it really well), though you can add details easily if you know PHP.

  115. Xaraya by wolf- · · Score: 1

    May want to look at Xaraya also.
    -> PHPNUke -> Postnuke -> Xaraya

    http://www.xaraya.com

    --
    ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
  116. Who are you hosting with? by AxelTorvalds · · Score: 1
    And are you buying them a year or something? I've been kicking the idea around too. My father in law, to be, is a rancher and breeds horses, there are a handful of horse businesses on the web and it lends itself well to a web site that doesn't require an IT staff to run, you can put a horse's information up (the parents, the name, etc..) and a picture but then instead of having to do a lot of transaction processing the buyers are going to call or email and ask questions so they don't need a full on eBusiness. There is one out of South Dakota that he and some of his buddies frequent and it's pretty cool, it has a picture of the horse, the full history, some notes, information and links to the parents, how much they sold for, etc. He's dealing with about 60 horses so it might be useful; I know he'd get a kick out of having one...

    I've looked at a handful of Zope hosting sites and antisipated that I'd build him some kind of system with Zope and plone, I'd like for it to be simple enough he could run it by himself and I think that it's possible with Zope, and if not I can do the heavier lifing from a state away. Anyone have experience with that? Any limitations? My biggest beef with Zope is the relative fragility that it has when some of the components on the system change, I assume that the virtual host isn't going to change anything without my approval, I don't want a new python or postgresql screwing the mix up.

    Best prices I've seen is hostway ($7 a year for a .com) for the domain and then hurrah.com does zope hosting with postgresql and what not for $25 a month. I've seen a few others and the prices seem to hover around $30 a month and up. Anyone know better rates? So that's $307 ($350 because I'll buy the domain for 5 years) a year, that's not too unreasonable for a Christmas gift; it's hard to say how good it is for his business though. If he sells 6 horses from leads that the website produced then I could see him easily finding it worth while and picking it up after the year I bought him expired, if he sells none then it's more of a nice novelty and I might be better off buying him a nice fly fishing rod or something else. I personally don't want to keep paying for it forever and I'd hate to help him get it built just to let it die after a year...

  117. e107 by MoThugz · · Score: 1

    I can only recommend e107 for a powerful yet user-friendly non-enterprise CMS solution.

    It also has a Coppermine gallery plugin which works very well.

  118. Re:the truth about the palestinians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True. And most people don't realize that even Arafat is an Egyptian.

  119. What about blogger? by dirk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it interesting that no one has suggested Blogger. While other tools are more powerful, for something simple, Blogger seems like the best idea. It is free, they can host it for you if you want, and it's even integrated into the Google toolbar. Nothing seems easier than just telling them to hit the toolbar and type in the window.

    --

    "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
  120. Um.... by runderwo · · Score: 1

    I can't believe this question was even asked. vim is the obvious choice for content management, bar none. Give your parents the gift of vim this season!

  121. Re:Look around at all the perdy choices by Yggdrasil42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, not "all the perdy choices". OpenSourceCMS only shows PHP related apps, but it is an excellent site. You get admin access to all the cms apps they've installed. Do almost anything you want! It's just what I needed last week, while figuring out how to build a custom PHP-based CMS for a client. It's great to be able to try the other solutions first.

  122. Blosxom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tried Plone, tried Movable Type, looked at PHPNuke -- all were overkill for my little blog.

    I settled on Blosxom. It's a Perl CGI script. Once it's set up and going, all the user needs to do is make directories (categories) and put text files (posts) in them. It's dead easy.

    It doesn't come with picture upload features, but there are several modules you can add, including one that interfaces with Gallery.

    And of course there's .Mac, but that's already been said.

    My blog is a very basic example of a Blosxom site.

  123. why reinvent the wheel? by Donnaldson · · Score: 1

    Um, why do you want mom and dad to setup their own solution when there are already a million free ones out there? You could probably get away with just signing them up for a service like giftaloud, and if they really need it they could use shutterfly or yahoo for their images.

  124. Maybe perhaps . . . by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    Because PHPNuke has had/will have/still has some really really serious security flaws in it?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  125. Advanced Choice: Mambo! by sillypixie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been investigating Mambo - it's opensource, content can be managed without programming knowledge, and all sorts of modules, such as threaded forums, blogs, etc are available (not sure about photo albums though). Same sort of backend as others that have been discussed, PHP/mySQL/apache.

    I've had a tour of the administration site for my friend's mambo install, and it sure does look sweet...

    Pixie

    --
    don't mess with those geekgrrls
    1. Re:Advanced Choice: Mambo! by Sven-Erik · · Score: 1

      Mambo has several photoalbums available. It is very easy to use and administer. And it is supported by a very active community and you also have several commercial Mambo-developers that can make spesialised versions and components.

      Sven-Erik Andersen

      --
      - "Every demand is a prison, and wisdom is only free when it asks nothing." Sir Betrand Russell
  126. Mambo is the one for me by VasLor · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have started using mambo and have found it the easiest installation yet. Upload it, go to your site and the installation routine does all the database for you in just a few screens. You need PHP and MySQL. It is geared for online news/blog/personal site but is scalable for commercial. Once you get the feel for adding articles and such, its a breeze and much more friendly than postnuke and moveable type. Plus, the template system is a cinch (just some include lines for the modules and components). Here is their link.

    http://www.mamboserver.com

    And my site I set up to keep my family up to date and for some personal musings.

    http://www.snappermorgan.com

    1. Re:Mambo is the one for me by dmboh · · Score: 1

      Have to agree, tried most of the rest. Now getting ready to move another 3 sites to using Mambo Open Source.

  127. Geeklog by BiggyP · · Score: 1

    well, i'm personally a recent convert to Geeklog http://www.geeklog.net/, it plays nicely in safe mode, is relatively painless to install, and from what i can tell easy for users, my only problem with it is the lack of integration with something other than Gallery, as i don't have netPBM or imagemagick available on my host.

    1. Re:Geeklog by Turias · · Score: 1

      I also recommend Geeklog, and am surprised that more people haven't mentioned it. It's easy to setup, has an excellent security model, and is simple for users to interact with and use.

  128. Try Microsoft SharePoint by E.S+Taog · · Score: 1

    Give Microsoft SharePoint a go. I've set it up for my grandparents and they love it!

  129. Magical Mirror room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been long been considering this... grandparents value *extremely* family contact, so I this idea of a Magical Mirror room, where someone goes to talk to another person, just like in old movies. See suggestions below...

    You must have as a minimum:

    - a good broadband link, ideally above 400Kbps, but 256Kbps may do;
    - two computers, each one with webcam, full-duplex soundcard, a good monitor, multimedia speakers _and_ (important) a good microphone;
    - software for conference call (I mean simple things like Netmeeting, Gnomemeeting or Linphone).

    How to do it: I don't know, but I'll try one of these days and *maybe* I post the results somewhere, if I get it to work... which I couldn't with Speakfreely. :-(

    Caveats:

    - dial-up connections won't be very good but it could be still be useful to share photos or drawings;
    - the Internet is totally irregular: you must know what you're doing (e.g., use an adequate protocol - maybe like UDP) _and_ be lucky (sometimes Internet jam prevents communication).

    Suggestions:

    - if you can afford, use some kind of giant screen (e.g. with a projector) to get a full, real-size image of the person you're talking, too.
    - remember, if your connection is good, it will be up at all times, even at night... so, better stop walking nude at home... ;-)
    - adjust volume so that someone at the other side can raise her/his voice and call you, even if you're in other room (that would be very weird -- and cool);
    - use a wireless microphone to allow for easy movement; don't use a table microphone or microphony (that loud annoying whistle) will ensue;
    - be prepared to upgrade your hardware and your software now and then: new codecs (like Speex) and a better connection (like 12Mbps) could allow you and your father to be separated by miles and still watch the same football game (on his TV, for instance).

    I know this is fairly obvious, has already been done and shown on TV, like in New Year events; nonetheless, there's a lot of hurdles (like bad connections) that still prevent it from working for the common man. Think about this like Wolfenstein 3D: who would say it would turn into Quake 3 so quick?

    But it was very important as a first step.

    1. Re:Magical Mirror room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not that offtopic, folks. The guy is asking for about a gift website, many have understood as a way of communicating photos etc.

      I'm just suggesting another way to the same aims.

      Do finally all ACs have been banned in the sense that we were confined to a non-visible corner, because of idiots who post disgusting links?

  130. Uh, wait. by apk · · Score: 1

    What's a website?

  131. Similar Situation by A+Binary+Rebel · · Score: 1

    I am a part-time web designer / PHP developer and recently picked up a computer illiterate client (worse than family?). They needed a website on which they could post event announcements. Seeing how I did not want to be bothered with doing these minor updates several times a month I opted to write a simple PHP based CMS. It only took me about a day and a half to write and is secure enough for the clients needs. It even has categories with icons and support for multiple posters. It uses mysql on the backend. If you have any experience with PHP I am sure you could hack something out.

    1. Re:Similar Situation by rcpitt · · Score: 1
      Hmmm... for those of us who don't have a day to waste -er spend - maybe you could publish the recipe for this wonderful solution somewhere.

      Otherwise, I expect I'd revert to my tried and true solution - FrontPage (with a Linux Apache server with the FrontPage extensions and no "root" web administration)

      I've crafted web pages using damned near everything from VI through to the latest and greatest versions of very expensive programs, including WIKIs and java-server systems with Oracle (and other DBMs) back ends that would be the envy of all, and for sheer ease of use and fun, I've never seen anything that can match FrontPage straight out of the box.

      I started with FP97 just because it had drag and drop navigation - then ran sed on all the files to delete the extra stuff that MS put in to announce to the world what it was doing.

      I've brought housewives with no computer skills up to the point where they are now successful web entrepreneurs using FP to do all their site - and not sweated the time since there was practically none on my part.

      The nice thing is that if they screw up, I can fix it from whereever I am (OK, I run the server and do backups - but rarely have to actually restore something they've lost)

      They can drag and drop - it is secure enough (the way I've set it up as per above - no root server) that none of the sites I've set up have had a problem (and some are now very large) BTW - I am a died in the wool UNIX/Linux person. I didn't use anything from MS for anything except preparing a hard disk for Unix/Xenix installation prior to 1996 (then ended up MIS director for a firm with MAC, Windows and UNIX people - what a time ;) but I am also a tool junkie - I hate using a screwdriver where a hammer is best and vice versa. FrontPage just works well, and if your family members are already running Windoze, why not?

      --
      Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
      and didn't get it
    2. Re:Similar Situation by A+Binary+Rebel · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.. Not sure if that was a flame attempt or not as I have never seen anything worse than FP for web development but I'll bite.

      I would be more than happy to post up the source for this except that Like I said I wrote in in about a day and a half. So perhaps in this case security by obscurity is the best option. I plan to put more time into soon as it actually turned out better than I thought it would. Perhaps one I do put it through its paces and am convinced that it does not pose any security issues I will put it up on FM or SF.

      I am not an experienced PHP developer this is my 3rd or 4th real project. That is why I said that if he had any experience with php he could hack something out.

      On the surface the thing seems secure but with source code in hand someone maybe able to find a flaw. Christ I sound like MS but thats the breaks I guess. For this small of a project and with the traffic that this particular site will draw, it works.

    3. Re:Similar Situation by rcpitt · · Score: 1
      Nope - not flame bate (well, maybe just a little bit ;)

      call it my ongoing "call to arms" when somebody says they've put together something that they think works well for them. Many people forget that the number of people now dealing with these technologies is such that the chances are excellent that somebody else has the same problem looking for a solution - but maybe not the same talent at cobbling something together.

      The other side of that is that when you let others take a look, (even anonymously) you can sometimes learn a lot.

      On the other hand, I'll (kind of) echo your sentiment about FP. Today it is nowhere near many others in terms of power and flexibility. The point to remember is that the question was about something for family (with no or minimal web/computer skills), not for an experienced and creative professional.

      FP has the advantage of being 2 pieces - the client and the host - and they conspire to make some things that should be simple actually simple!

      Setting (and changing) an overall theme.

      Drag and drop navigation

      Work "directly" with pages on the net (try to explain the fact of a copy "here" and a copy "there" to grandma)

      templates for subsections that are protected and easy add/change for access rights

      templates for other mainstream functions - feedback forms, discussion forums, etc.

      Drawbacks are mostly to do with things that grandma doesn't care about - flash, animations, etc. but the one that some of my "pet" sites have run up against is slow response to major (all page) changes (such as themes) when the site gets large.

      Anyway - MS is bound to screw it up at some point. Personally I think that FP2000 was just capable enough to be useful without being pretentious ;)

      --
      Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
      and didn't get it
  132. Dear Goatse by Letter · · Score: 0
    Dear Goatse,

    I see your colon!

    Cheers,
    Letter

  133. Use CityDesk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's great for non-tech-savvy and experts alike.

    www.fogcreek.com/citydesk

  134. Frankensite... by gmuslera · · Score: 1
    ... is what I call a site made with parts of other programs, where you have different authentication/user base for each part, different way to be managed, different look&feel, etc. You could had choosen very good programs for each section (gallery, phpnuke, drupal, etc) but they are different worlds each one. That make things more difficult to learn and use.

    If I suggest something, i would try to give or a from the start integrated solution (i.e. TikiWiki) or components that mix and match almost seamlessy (i.e. all they can share the same authentication system, very similar themes or one being plugin of another, and things like that)

  135. Try CityDesk by rcastro0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is not really a blogger, but it lets your folks write articles with pictures in them, and publish them hitting one button. Unlike most CMS this one is a program in Windows, and archives all files locally. When you hit "Publish" it generates tables of contentes, indexes, etc. and uploads what changed through FTP.

    http://www.fogcreek.com/CityDesk/index.html

    The starter version, which lets one publish up to 50 articles, is free. Do take a look at it for a nice and easy CMS. Also, for your templates, don't forget to check Open Source Web Desgins -- http://www.oswd.org/ )

    --
    Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
  136. Contribute by martinX · · Score: 1

    Set up the website using Dreamweaver (if you want. it makes it easier but it's not compulsory) and get them a copy of Contribute. The only tricky bit is keeping up the navigation.

    Or buy them a Mac AND get .Mac + Contribute for a low low price :-)

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  137. TikiWiki by dethface · · Score: 1

    Try TikiWiki - http://tikiwiki.sourceforge.net It's a CMS with a TON of other functionality including photo galleries, blogs, forums, and a very full featured wiki. The whole thing is administered with a fairly intuitive HTML interface. They won't need to know any HTML to create web (wiki) pages, upload pictures and files, and post to their weblogs. I use it for a family website and have had great success with it.

  138. Warning by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

    ...as you do not look the gift website in the mouth.

    I should have posted this anonymously.
    (-1) Stupid

  139. Dear Mom and Dad, by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    I know you've worked hard these many years and you've done such a fine job raising us, helping us with our homework, putting up with my D&D phase, working two jobs to put us through college, and loaning me money for that Nigerian investment that didn't quite pan out.

    To honor you I've decided to get you your own website. Oh, I know how excited you must be - finally, you're a dot commer too! It's much more than that you see. First, you have to maintain the content and update it regularly. This is to keep the family informed. Please post the pictures we send you and take some of your own. Make sure you orient them right, don't upload them if they're too large, and I find that increasing brightness and contrast plus a touch of sharpen image makes pictures look terrif! I know you don't have a digital camera - just ask for a CD of pictures when you have your film developed - it's only a few dollars more.

    In addition to the gift of maintaining content I've also given you the opportunity to learn new software. While something like Microsoft Front Page would really be useful to you in maintaining your site, Microsoft is bad so instead I've refurbished this Pentium 120 and installed Linux on it. To go with it, here is a vi reference card (look, it's laminated!) and "Teach yourself HTML in 21 days".

    I know you think this is enough, but it's not! You'll also be receiving all sorts of e-mail from friends, family, and most of all, advertisers. You'll find "webmaster@ourfamily.com" is a very popular address. (here's a tip - "enhancement" products do not work) Finally, I present to you the gift of recurring bills in the form of domain name registration and web hosting. Don't worry, it's not much and it's a small price to pay to be on the Information Superhighway!

    Love,

    Your spiteful son


    Look guy, just get your parents a Netflix gift membership. They'll thank you for it.

  140. Easy to use and free (beer) already exists by Frums · · Score: 1
    I am risking a lot posting the link to /., but why not. I set up a "Gift List" thing years ago and just opened it to the public this year.

    The UI isn't spectacularly pretty, but it works well (though the CSS is broken in IE, oh well) and has all the needed functionality.

    The Wish List

    -Brian

    1. Re:Easy to use and free (beer) already exists by sharph · · Score: 1

      I've heard of RTFA, but this?

    2. Re:Easy to use and free (beer) already exists by Frums · · Score: 1

      You're right, I skimmed and didna read. Sue me, this is /. =)

      -Brian

    3. Re:Easy to use and free (beer) already exists by stu42j · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing too, when I first read the title. I frequently find the titles on /. to be misleading.

      I actually was quite curious to hear people's suggestions for wish list sites/code.

  141. Re:Your parents will hate you...NOT by dr_canak · · Score: 1

    Have you looked at the Ceiva Frame:

    http://www.ceiva.com/

    They're terrific for the grandmas of the family. Relatively cheap, and anyone you give permission to can upload pictures. Essentially, the thing calls home at a frequency you set, and downloads whatever pictures have recently been uploaded. So family from all over the world can upload pics via the web, and then the thing just automagically calls home at night (to a local number you pick), and the next morning the person sees all the brand new pictures appearing in the frame.

    The only problem I ran into with the one I bought my brother is that around the Holidays, as many of these things are given as gifts, the call in number is busy for awhile, so it doesn't update every day. But once the holidays passed, the frame called home relgiously and grabbed all the new pics for my brother.

    Kind of off topic I know, but sounds like something your grandmother would like.

    jeff

  142. we can help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We might be able to help, and we can also combine our hosting with a dialup package in most areas of the US.
    • http://www.scronline.com
    The pricing is a bit higher than most hosting, but we work with you person to person instead of tossing you into a control panel. You can run any content management system you want. In this case, I would setup something like Moveable type. Possibly postnuke and just show them how to actually use it.
  143. Re:DON'T SHOOT ME, BUT WHAT ABOUT FRONT PAGE? by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    And you forgot that he used capital letters for his subject heading... that's an important one!

  144. ... Plone is the winner! by axxackall · · Score: 1
    Don't use Plone/Zope

    What are you waiting then? Try it now! In fact, Plone will give the best implementation of content management right out the box. Plus, Plone, being based on CMF and Zope, still let you to increase even that level. Wokrflow management, Rule and Role Based Access Control, triggers and out the box persistence with ZODB, load-balancing and distribution with ZEO - I can list more. Zope brings a whole Universe to you without requiring to know all of that. By default Plone is already well designed and very usable. And once you begin to change it - you learn it, step-by-step, by example. Of course you don't have to learn all that for simple blogging: just install Plone and start using it. That's it.

    --

    Less is more !
  145. this may be an unpopular choice but... by sirshannon · · Score: 1

    I would suggest getting a $9.99/month ASP.Net hosting plan and installing .Text for them. It is a free (as in beer) blog engine with an okay photo-gallery system.

    Pros: extrememly easy-to-use and easy to learn. It is also as free-as-in-speech as you can get for MS-based software so you can download the source and fix any bugs you find or download an already-changed version from someone if the problem you have is one they've already had. (I refuse to call any .net software "open source" because I don't think it can really be 100% open.)

    Cons: thumbnails are not cropped square, they retain the original photos' aspect ratio. Requires MS SQL Server. Requires IIS, ASP.Net. The rich text editor is a plain text box in any browser other than IE.

    NOTE: this is not what I use for my sirshannon.com engine, I use a weak-azz homebrew I plan on replacing when the next .Text release hits.

  146. .NET ASP photo album by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're running Windows, you can try dynamicthumbnails a .NET ASP photo album at
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/dynthumbnails/

  147. try movable type's baby brother Typepad by happystink · · Score: 1

    I tried the beta of Typepad.com and it's what you want, photo albums, blog stuff, all hosted and very easy to use for beginners, but with the power of Movable Type. Costs a bit, but you can add a domain name to it for them even, very nice.

    --

    sig:
    See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

  148. not a bad idea but... by spid101 · · Score: 0

    it would be waaay more fun to get a mouse with a 60 foot cord, connect it to the pc and gift wrap it under the christmas tree. Oh, and the mouse should have an arrow pointing to left click !_! damn the holidays! oh god why bother.

  149. I second this... by Riskable · · Score: 1

    I've setup Postnuke sites for computer-challenged people before. There's a couple different gallery plugins and you have total control over the way it looks. The best part is that there's not a separate admin account you need to login to. Just add the users you want to the admin group and they have all privelages. Heck, you can even setup the permimssions so that they only have the ability to manage the gallery and news.

    Two sites I designed, one with all postnuke features, and one with just a gallery, news, downloads, and an FAQ:

    http://zaurus.loveslinux.com
    http://www.riskabl e.com (self plug)

    I'm not a web designer nor a programmer. But I can make a decent-looking Postnuke site. Definitely give PostNuke a look.

    --
    -Riskable
    "Those who choose proprietary software will pay for their decision!"
  150. pMachine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is very easy to use.

  151. Wiki's are great by dheltzel · · Score: 1
    You're right about using a Wiki. And the best Wiki out there is TikiWiki (http://www.tikiwiki.org).

    Yes, I'm one of the developers (1 of about 140)

  152. Not a CMS?? by gnurb · · Score: 1

    Right at the very top of the page, on phpnuke's logo it says "advanced content management system"

    wtf?

    http://phpnuke.org/themes/PHPNuke-Max/images/log o. gif

    --
    hooray! it's a sex wiki
  153. Radio Userland by warwick · · Score: 1

    Pick Radio. It's $40 and you get a year of free updates, built-in web hosting and the app runs on a Mac or a PC. The program is managed through a web browser and it also allows remote management (so you can help your family when needed.

    Most of all, you can post pictures just by dropping them into a foler and the are *automagically* up to the web

    --
    If your /. ID is below 25,000 you probably outgrew this and got a weblog
  154. RE: Mac, all the way! by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm going to "third" this suggestion!
    I just got home from a LONG day of doing on-site PC service, and the last 3 calls I've struggled with were the same old story. Clueless family orders high-speed Internet access and plugs cable/DSL modem straight into the back of the computer. A month or two later, system has slowed to a crawl and loses connection constantly. Web pages often produce "DNS error" messages. Pop up ads are out of control.

    Say what you will about the Mac, but none of this crap happens in the "Mac world". Not only that, but you get photo software that actually downloads images off their digital camera with zero pain and hassle (just plug the thing in and away it goes). You get easy web site creation via .Mac. You get iTunes and the Apple music store (start them out right, instead of trying to pirate music of questionable quality off Kaaza, Morpheus, etc.). And lastly, you get (at least in many major cities) a nice clean, store you can walk into and get a respectable amount of customer service and assistance. (Before you flame me on this one, I'm well aware of some of the horror stories. But *in general*, you're talking about a place that offers regular free training on their popular products, a "genius bar" that's there just so you can ask questions/get help, and more. Beats calling some 800# and waiting on hold for 40 mins.)

  155. Re:.Mac, iBlog by vangilder · · Score: 1

    If you're running Panther (10.3.x), be sure to get the updated version of iBlog (1.3.4 as of post time). Earlier versions have a bug that prevents publishing to .Mac.

  156. Re:.mac .mac .mac iBlog, Backup, Virex, iPhoto, iD by techno-vampire · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mac/PC is a bit of a holy war. but instead of arguing it, I'm going to point out just what type of person each is best for. When Apple was designng the Mac, they surveyed artists, and set up an interface that worked the way artists work. If that's how your mind works, fine; us it, as it's best for you. If you're not artistic, as I'm not, it's wrong and feels like it. For me, a PC is better, because it comes closer to working the way I want a computer to work. My point is, find out which one feels right and stick with it. As you're setting up a site for your parents, let them experiment a little with both, and find out what makes them comfortable, then get them that.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  157. Not always a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have you considered that giving computer illiterate people their own website may have unpleasant side effects?
    For some reason people forget about the simplest security measures, such as publishing their mailing address on one page, and the pictures and names of all their children on another.
    After all, only the family is going to see it, right?

    If you're going to set them up with a site, sit them down and give them a good lesson on what they should and shouldn't post.

  158. tikiwiki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about:
    linux + apache + mod_php + perl + tikiwiki + adsl + dyndns.org = :)

  159. Perl by ReadParse · · Score: 0

    Oh, and vim. PostgreSQL for data storage. Should take you a week to slam out a custom content management system. Absent the current skills, add O'Reilly to the list. Llama, then Camel. Wish your folks a happy holiday from me.

  160. Re:Zope from the trenches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm lucky enough to have a full time job developing custom products for Zope (yay, fs python+subversion is your friend!). ZPT is indeed the second coming, or rather the whole concept of TAL (template attribute language) is. Why major players aren't scrambling to adopt TAL is beyond me. Finally, scripted pages that validate as HTML!

    However, zope 2's api is convoluted and poorly documented (and worse, changes between versions in ways that is even more poorly documented). Zope itself is a nice framework+ODB for developing truly OO web apps with python. However, CMF and Plone are so single-purposed for CM as to be practically useless as a basis for anything else. Say, intranet apps with multilayered security or interesting workflow. Good luck doing anything interesting without mondo monkey patching. And heaven forbid if you have the poor luck to run afoul of acquisition.... spawn of the devil, to hell with thee!

    Really, I prefer coding for embedded, but if you have to do webdev Zope is the only way to fly despite its warts.

  161. She's cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, she's cute.

  162. Re:Your parents will hate you...NOT by Resseguie · · Score: 1
    The Ceiva Frame is an interesting idea. I have seen the ones that let you use a memory card to rotate through a set of pictures, but never one that updates.

    Although, what I'd prefer, is a frame with wireless built in so it can update from the web via my existing internet connection rather than having to dial out every night. Has anyone see something like this?

    Doing a quick google search didn't give me a commercial product, but I did find the following link that might be of interest to someone:

    Building a digital picture frame from a PowerBook Duo 270c/280c

  163. Re:Look around at all the perdy choices by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1

    Neat. I couldn't help noticing that Scoop and Slash are missing though, although PHPNuke is represented.. do they have any reason for that? Also Movable Type is missing but that isn't open source.

  164. MovableType + Gallery by Saeger · · Score: 1, Troll
    My girlfriend used to work on her art website the oldfashioned way: shuttling files through WS_FTP and editing the basic HTML with notepad.exe. Eventually the site grew too large and unwieldy for her to manage so she asked me to do something.

    I set her up with a MovableType blog - even though her webhost provided a ready-to-use blog called Bloxsom - so she could keep people up to date and interact with the other artsy-fartsy bloggers. I also setup an art Gallery for her to more easily manage and show off (and sell) her photography.

    She says she'd never go back to the way she did it before because of all the time the web interfaces save her. I imagine these kinds of CMS's will only get more popular as time goes on; and I for one am GLAD to see the barrier to entry being lowered for people would rather spend their time taking pictures than fucking around with archane nuts and bolts.

    (PS. please don't mod this up - don't want a /.'ing ... and I'm not using reverse psychology you ... you sweaty, basement-dwelling, cocksucking mods. crap. now that would be a mod up out of revenge, so here's a link to goatse.cx and tubgirl - nobody mods that shit up).

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:MovableType + Gallery by Sjobeck · · Score: 0

      Why ruin a perfectly great reply with those last two links. Jesum Crowe. Disgusting.

    2. Re:MovableType + Gallery by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Because, even though the post is marginally interesting, I really didn't want it to be modded up where too many people would see it and suck up all the site's limited bandwidth. thankfully someone was kind enough to cancel out a spiteful up mod with a troll downmod. Anyway, sorry you had to see the troll pics. >:)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  165. photo management system by bwy · · Score: 1

    You might want to check out B*Gallery. It is an easy to use desktop client (written in Java, no less) for building up photo galleries. It also makes easy work of publishing the content to your ISP.

  166. Use Existing Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe your goal is to create something from scratch? If not, there are a bunch of services you can buy into that do some of the same stuff and many of them have put a lot of time into their user interface to make it fairly easy for non-programmers to participate.

    Ideas:
    Use o-photo or shutterfly in conjunction with a password protected blog. Or use a family site system like MyFamily.com or FamiliesR.us (I use familiesr.us. I still end up doing most of the posting in the family.)

  167. Uh, why? by gkuz · · Score: 0
    I'm considering giving my parents their very own website for the holidays.

    I may be excessively dense here, but why on earth would you want to do this? This is the sort of idea that probably only makes sense on /. If you want to get them a gift, get a gift. You'd be giving them a chore that by your own admission they're not suited for, and a monthly bill, just to demonstrate how clever you are.

  168. free ad-free hosting for 3 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just went through the process of looking for a hosting company and wound up taking advantage of the unbeatable promotional offer over at <a href="http://www.1and1.com">http://www.1and1.com</ a> where you get 3 years of hosting for free. Domain registration is the cheapest I've seen too at $5.99 per year.

    500mb storage
    linux shell account
    50 pop3 accounts
    1 mysql database
    1 secure server redirection
    cron jobs
    etc, etc

    I installed movable type there with no problems at all.

  169. Re:Why not DIY? - One Experience by H310iSe · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was stuck with this same question, a lot of our clients, art gallerys, adult entertainment, etc. all needed self-publishing (basically so they'd leave us, their site designers, alone), I didn't find anything that fit the layout of their sites (I didn't want to change the overall look) so I started writing something that was somewhat flexible in terms of layout.

    All I knew, well, was asp so it's written for IIS, and uses some PHP for file uploads and Graphicsmagic (spawn of ImageMagick) for image manipulation. It works directly with the file system and text files, no database.

    If I had to do it over I might say use MySQL but I wanted to make it work pretty much anywhere, and I knew the file system object so... Anyway I started about 9 months ago and it should be finished any day now ... really. Nearly done. So that's the only problem with DIY, you have to be fast, or really dedicated. IMHO A content management system is not THAT easy...

    --
    closed minded is as closed minded does
  170. thanks by cerebralpc · · Score: 2

    thanks for putting this post up.
    My mum wants me to create a photo gallery for my dads 60th birthday.
    Its a gallery from when they where 21 and travelled by combi van overland from Singapore, through Iran and Iraq to Turkey and then through Europe to England.
    I'm going to give your suggested Gallery a look at.
    Can I ask a question? What is a good host? One that has decent MB allowance, supports the required PHP and not to many ads?

  171. free easy wysiwyg cms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    sitesage is brain-dead simple. used it for about 4 months for my personal site. free for personal use. the latest release (5.0.8) support wysiwyg editing with mozilla 1.3a or higher

  172. Re:Rethink this - correct by gmby · · Score: 1

    If someone has shown interest in having a site then; Yes, get them one AND show them how to use it. If they have'nt ever shown any interest; then they won't.
    Just the idea of doing something like that (putting up a web site) is very scarry to most non-tech types (in the time set on there VCR?). If you show them and they pay attention then there's hope after all. You better be ready with some "content" to put on it or your wasting time. They are not going to have/know/get any content for it on from there computer. Buy a digital camera or scanner and then the site domain.

    Been, There, Done, That.

    Good luck...

    --
    I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
  173. List of many free CMS systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try CMSwebmaster.com
    Great resource

  174. photos for parents by junkgoof · · Score: 1
    My mother got me a digital video camera before the birth of my daughter. I have a ridiculous number of mpegs and jpegs of her on the site, and my mother enjoys them. No memory sticks, just tapes that don't play on anything commonly available.

    I'll have to check out GNU transcode again. Last time I checked it did not support digital video, but it claims to now. I've been using a Windows product that forces me to manually select digital video files to convert them to mpeg. With transcode most of the process (all except actually getting the stuff on the computer which I need to watch anyway) will be scripted. I'd password protect the site, but I can't imagine anyone outside the family could possibly care. Maybe when she hits high school...

    I won't give the URL because:
    • No one would care
    • I don't have the bandwidth to deal with a slashdotting from the obsessive link followers.
    • I'd be really worried about the sort of people who would actually look at the site.
    • Cowboy Neal might make fun of my lack of web skills.


    The web is good for small things that only a few people care about as well as stuff that lots of people want to see.
    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  175. Don't waste your time by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1
    Just give them an AOL account or set up a BLOG account.

    In truth, all you're going to do by giving them "their own website" is just create yet another back water of stagnant web content. I would bet you that months from now it will be one of those websites where we see...

    March 3, 2004 We'll be updating this website real soon with new stuff!

    ...and it's August 18, 2004 Save yourself and your parents the pain. Give them something they will remember and not so transitory.

  176. Try simpli.biz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their Basic Personal package is $8.95/month quarterly and they provide PostgreSQL and Python support. Lots of Slashdotters host with them since the owner has a journal here.

  177. Re:When you can't find software that fits your nee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you recommend a Perl script that will work with glitter, macaroni, gold spraypaint, and mySQL?

  178. PHP Gallery is hard to beat by hungryfrog · · Score: 3, Informative
    I've been using Gallery as an online photo album for a little over a year. It's an absolutely awesome PHP-based tool. Very slick UI, automatic thumbnailing and creation of comfortable screen-size images, plus tie-ins to digital printing services (e.g. Shutterfly). There's even Gallery Remote, which is a nicely done Java app to allow you to drag-and-drop entire batches photos directly into your online galleries. I often have my pics on my site within minutes of returning home.

    I'm more or less a linux newbie, but I found Gallery to be really easy to set up and host from my home box over my cable connection (with a bit of port forwarding... damn you port-blocking ISP bastards!). If you want to use a commercial host, the requirements for Gallery are pretty minimal. The only non-standard thing required is the netPBM image libraries. It uses a pretty slick mechanism to store serialzed data in text files, so no DB required.

  179. Even your grandma can use this... by mixwhit · · Score: 2, Informative

    webeasel.net is one example of a content system so easy your grandma can use it. Its a locally produced new product from an up-and-coming tech company in town (Urbana, IL). I don't work there but know people who do.

  180. ezPublish Open Source CMS by nazgul000 · · Score: 1

    ezPublish is a very sophisticated GPL-licensed CMS that I've used for several projects. Really worth a look; for some reason it's a lot better known among Europeans (perhaps because it's developed by a bunch of Norwegians).

    The salience to this discussion is that's real simple to administrate an EZ site, and install/setup is more straightforward than other similar systems I've tried.

  181. Check out this service for personal web sites by spooniep · · Score: 1

    DigitalWork offers a personal web site service that's really easy to use, and includes a blog, unlimited photo posting, calendar and e-mail applications. Their service is only about 10 bucks a month and includes a domain name. The other cool thing is that the photo album lets you instantly post using a cell phone or any e-mail client.

  182. 'Kwiki' is a CMS so easy, even your mother can... by yoyoboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I should know, I did exactly what you are proposing for my mother last mother's day. She wanted a website where she could share her quilting and craft projects with family and friends...

    So I setup QuiltZilla for her. I took me five minutes to get it up and running, and it only took her 10 days and a digital camera to get the first 200 pages of content in the system.

    But don't take my word for it, check it out for yourself.

    Kwiki is a simple wiki based content management system, that even my mother can use, and it only takes minutes to set up.

  183. a simple suggestion by rnd() · · Score: 1

    Here's a simple suggestion:

    For the content management part, all you need to do is create the capability for them to add new sections, each with a customizable title and content. For the content, just have them type into a DIV, and write some simple javascript functions to handle formatting within the DIV, and then save the innerHTML to an XML file or to a database.

    Storing the data in an XML file is pretty simple. Then use XSLT to generate the page. That way, you can also give them a new "skin" or "theme" for future holidays/gifts and they will be able to immediately apply it to their existing content. Just make sure you escape the HTML you store inside the XML properly... :)

    IMHO this can be done a lot simpler with XML/XSLT and a simple schema, and will be very portable if they change web hosting providers, etc.

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

  184. Website?!?! by breon.halling · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man, and here I was all proud of making my folks a clay ashtray.

    --
    "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
  185. PXGallery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comes with themed plugins, gallery options, minor image editing options. Can include custom scripting code files, etc.

    http://www.howdev.com/

  186. EASY & FREE solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1. Go to my very simple example Web-page at http://www.geocities.com/michael_xavier_maelstrom/ tag2.html

    (WARNING! This page contains picture of Alyson Hannigan in plaid in suggestive position)

    Step 2. Use your web-browsers VIEW-SOURCE command to see the entire HTML document that generates my page.

    It is very small but contains ALL the commands you will need to develop a full web page with photos and text including a very simple technique for increasing or decreasing font/text size.

    Step 3. Get them a FREE Geocities web page and use my web-page source-code as your template plugging in your family photo(s) and your own text, 'natch.

    Step 4. Now all you have to do is teach them how to log into geocities.com and hit the EDIT button on index.html and show them where to add text.

    Presto instant EASY web-site and blog at the touch of a button, and, best of all it's COMPLETELY FREE.

    Hope it helps.

  187. Wiki by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    Why not some kind of wiki? You type into a text box, press OK and it appears on the page. But not every wiki has good support for pictures.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  188. phpWebSite by thegraham · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try phpWebSite http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu/, I haven't used it myself, but it seems good and people have given me positive reviews.

    Thomas

  189. OpenACS is made for this... by vamix · · Score: 1

    You might want to take a look at OpenACS (http://openacs.org) which is a 'community toolkit', and you will have all sorts of things like chat rooms, photo albums, blogs, and a lot more pre-built.

  190. Re:EASY & FREE solution (nice pic!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of Alyson. :)

  191. Use Tonguewag by youngerpants · · Score: 1

    OK, I'm probably a bit late in the day for this, but I'll post anyway.

    I personally use Tonguewag http://www.tonguewag.com

    Its ideal for users such as your family as content can be updated through a number of avenues, including Messenger, and has the benefit of video blogging.

  192. Well by ajs318 · · Score: 1
    Me being me, I'd write the whole lot from scratch so it didn't look like anything existing. I'd use a MySQL database and Perl or PHP scripts. Probably PHP for the easy file upload interface. There is a command called "mogrify" [in imagemagick or imagemagick-devel] that you can use to resize images for thumbnails. Any decent ISP will have it installed. The syntax you need is something like
    mogrify -geometry 160x120! foo
    160x120 is the size you want [width x height]; the ! forces mogrify to override the initial aspect ratio. If you omit it, it will keep the aspect ratio and just treat the measurements as a maximum. Note that mogrify overwrites files by default, so you might want to do
    cp foo bar && mogrify -geometry 160x120! bar
    Want to show off your l337 H4x0r 5|<!11Z? A field of type BLOB can hold up to 64K, so you should be able to fit the thumbnails actually in the database - just write a script to spit out the headers
    content-type: image/jpeg
    content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
    followed by a blank line and the image data. It's entirely legal to say
    <IMG SRC="display.jpg?id=20">
    where "display.jpg" is actually a script that accepts parameters ..... you have to give it the .jpg extension for the benefit of lame browsers that ignore MIME-types in favour of extensions. But of course, that would just be pointless willy-waggling, because you could just put the filename in the database and it wouldn't be any worse, less to go wrong too :-)
    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  193. try out xoops by thomas_klopf · · Score: 1

    I like Xoops a lot - it's very easy to administrate, and has some nice modules
    http://www.xoops.org
    You need PHP and MySQL (it might support other databases, but I'm not sure). Also, it works with a "standard" compilation of php (no extra modules), which a lot of ISP's have.

  194. Wiki security by MartinB · · Score: 1

    Easily done - build the Wiki on top of an app server that handles the security for you.

    Without wanting to flog a dead horse, Zope will do this for you. Ooh look - a Zope-based wiki. Plays nicely on top of Plone, too.

    --

    The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

  195. .Mac for Windows by MartinB · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.mac.com/1/mac_faq.html

    Q: Is .Mac available to Microsoft Windows users?

    Customers cannot sign up for a .Mac trial account using a Windows machine, but they can sign up for a full .Mac membership.

    If your family are using Linux, you're SoL, but from the context of the question (need an idiot-proof solution), I suspect this is not the case.

    --

    The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

  196. Re:.mac .mac .mac iBlog, Backup, Virex, iPhoto, iD by acey72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I dunno - I work in IT, use a Mac (home and work) and am not, by any stretch of the imagination, particularly artistic! Neither for that matter are friends of mine who work in network ops for a big IT multinational, and choose Mac for their own machines.

    (I only 'switched' from Windows about 18 months ago, and at first found some things on the Mac annoying; now I find the lack of consistency on Windows far more infuriating.)

  197. $20 discount on Macromedia Contribute by iliketrash · · Score: 1

    .Mac is giving subscribers a $20 rebate on Macromedia Contribute. Also, free iBlog, free Virex (like they'll really need that), free Backup utility, free VersionTracker Plus (like they'll use that), training stuff (some free), free sound tracks for their movies, thousands of free AACs, automatic address syncing for access from any browser on any computer, bla bla bla.

  198. Stupd idea (possibly) by Big+Nothing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People always say "get them what you want, what you'd like to get, and you're home safe"...

    ...which is a load of CRAP! My family has been following that logic for years, and all I get is tasteless crap that they'd love to get for themselves, but I hate and wouldn't ordinarily touch with a ten foot pole.

    Consequently: don't get your parents what you'd like to get yourself, or what you think they should have. Get them something they actually want. My guess is that a website/blog is NOT on the top of your their whish list.

    P.S.: For those of you who whish to buy ME a gift, you (almost) can't go wrong with Thinkgeek D.S.

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    1. Re:Stupd idea (possibly) by freeweed · · Score: 1

      People always say "get them what you want, what you'd like to get, and you're home safe"...

      Who the hell says that?!? Homer Simpson? (see the bowling episode from season 1).

      Anyone who says something like that can be described in one word: self-centred.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  199. while talking about CMSs: Typo3 is worth a look! by nerbas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Shoot with cannons on pidgeons but if you'd like to have a look at full-blown CMSs give the OpenSource Typo3 a look - after looking through all these phpNuke* siblings which (usually) lack a reasonable user management or real user-definded templates I found typo3 to be scalable, user-friendly and loaded with tons of "extensions" (they call it) for e.g. implementing awstats and such. The learning curve is quite steep but worth dealing with...

    -nerbas.

  200. Mambo by arevos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mambo isn't bad. It's certainly pretty simple to use. opensourceCMS has an example of it.

  201. CityDesk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    impressed me. it's not db driven, instead it just generates all the HTML pages statically and then uploads it to the webserver. very simple. you can find it somewhere from http://www.joelonsoftware.com

  202. WEBAPP !!! by linuxrunner · · Score: 1

    http://www.web-app.org

    It's a NON-SQL Web Portal, written in perl, with a ton of Add-on's.

    They're going through a complete OO rewrite right now, but it's definately worth a try, and I've run it on my sites for ages now.

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
  203. Open Source CMS is a solution by The_Xnuiem · · Score: 1

    check out http://www.opensourcecms.com/ They have a pretty good list of CMS systems.

  204. eZ publish by hovik · · Score: 1

    eZ publish is definitly one of the best open source CMS out there. I prefer it for it's flexibility, but it's also simple to use.

    If you wan't you can alter the admin interface and make it even easier for your parents to use. If you configure the webDAV support properly, your parents can just drag'n drop new images directly into the site (works with konqueror and ie).

    You can download it from http://ez.no.

  205. LivePlone by g8rg33k · · Score: 1

    I haven't tried it yet myself (anyone know of a .torrent?) but there is a Knoppix-based LiveCD version of Plone called LivePlone

  206. Re: Mac, all the way! by jonhuang · · Score: 1

    Obligatory horror story in an attempt to put this thread back on topic.

    The last time I went into an apple store, I brought my camera. I _always_ bring my camera. I take pictures, that's what I do. Sometimes, I upload them to my webpage (I run gallery too).

    Three steps in, they kicked me out into the street. I didn't even take off the lens cap.

    Then while I waited on the street for my friends, the guard came out to the public street and tried to tell me off for loitering. Don't you dare take a picture of the storefront, he said.

    I took a picture of him.

    Presumably, if I had had a .mac account, I would have been able to plug in my 300D and uploaded that without any effort. yay.

  207. XP doesn't crash like you say. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    There are many, many things wrong with XP. But it doesn't crash like you say. You should suspect a hardware problem. The most common issue is that when a computer is moved, the case flexes enough that one or more of the adapter cards stops making full reliable contact.

    Just open the case and pull all the cards out a sixteenth of an inch or 2 millimeters. Then push the cards back in. (You will need to loosen the screws.) Do the same with the memory and the cable connectors.

    Once the hardware is reliable, you may need to do a re-load of XP, but maybe not.

  208. Take a look at wikis by limako · · Score: 1

    I suggest you take a look at wikis. Every page just has an edit button and, while it takes an afternoon to learn HTML, you can learn wiki markup in 10 or 15 minutes. There are a whole bunch of wiki from the very simple to the extremely complex. TikiWiki is a particularly powerful one that can do everything you describe wanting to do.

  209. Easy, first.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download giFT, then setup OpenFT in LAN mode. Then all your content management problems will be gone.

  210. a website for christmas? by Ripe+Tomato · · Score: 1

    wow that is pretty geeky!

  211. Gallery Alt. by mkelley · · Score: 1

    Try Photostack instead. It's easier to setup than Gallery and you don't need a database, just PHP.

    --

    m.kelley
    life is like a freeway, if you don't look you could miss it.
    1. Re:Gallery Alt. by h0bbel · · Score: 1

      Gallery (http://gallery.menalto.com) does *NOT* need a database of any sort. It uses serialized datafiles. All you need is PHP, and some imageprocessing toolkit, ie NetPBM or ImageMagick.

      --
      h0bbel
  212. Rolling My Own by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    I ran into a similar predicament and decided to roll my own. So far I have Stories, Comments, Events, Accounts and and a calendar. I think I have maybe 12 pages of php. Sites based on Nuke just have too much legacy code clutter.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  213. It's not that bad. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Mom, don't listen to this guy, that new car would still be just fine. I know about the gas and oil changes. ;)

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:It's not that bad. by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's "Ask Slashdot" -- you're not only going to get opinions you agree with. :)

  214. Make sure that they really want it by Turin · · Score: 1

    I've done something similar in the past (I didn't bill it as an Xmas present, but I did set up a site for my family) and it doesn't get used. If you want to set it up and maintain it, great. But I'd get them something with a smaller learning curve as well.

    Just my 2c.

  215. I used to use by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    PostNuke, but found it cumbersome and tough to administer. Check out "GeekLog" (Link). I have found it pretty secure, easy to manage and easy to write new code for. It only took me about 10 minutes to get it up and running on a Windows platform (for testing...). One key feature I like, is that the developers always seem to be around to answer questions about features on their discussion boards.

    --
    Sig it.
  216. Well... by boatboy · · Score: 1

    If you don't like PHPNuke, you probably won't like DotNetNuke, but I use it and it's decent. One feature I haven't seen elsewhere is the ability to do multiple portals with one instance. In other words mom, dad, and your dog can all have a site on one hosting account. It is in it's infancy, though.

  217. Re: Mac, all the way! by lonb · · Score: 1

    You also give up the right to fair competition in the market. If apple screws you, like they have in many horror stories, you have no recourse. And once your entire life is based on their proprietary systems (including software, hardware, vendors, etc.) the change factor is high.

    --
    "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
  218. Wiki Wiki, Make my Dreams Come True by lonb · · Score: 1

    Why not install php wiki for them? It's easy to get running and super easy to use. It has all sorts of nifty add ons for galleries, blogs, media, rss feeds, and more. It's way past the novice level for installation, but solidly in novice ground for daily use. Plus it comes with a bunch of design themes (lots more available online) and you can design your own. If you want it only for use by your gift recipient, simply secure edit authority appropriately. Good luck!

    --
    "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
  219. Yikes! by bobalu · · Score: 1

    he he, good move taking a pic of the guard. Bet he LOVED that. Even if they have some privacy policy re. the employees that disallows picture taking, there's no reason to throw somebody out. Unless of course you were that egregiously annoying in only three steps. :-)

    I bought my first Mac last month, a G4 12" Powerbook and I love it. Considering I've been programming under DOS and Windows since forever, that's saying something. And hey, it's Unix underneath so there's something to play with when you get tired of the pretty icons.

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
    1. Re:Yikes! by jonhuang · · Score: 1

      That's true enough. the hardware price/perform ratio doesn't appeal to me, but OSX's one sexy bitch..

  220. Bang! by X-Nc · · Score: 1

    I like using Bang! for my news/blog stuff. I have tried a number of photo album tools and none of the ones I've looked at is what you'd call noobie friendly.

    --
    --
    If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
  221. Stop being a cheapskate...give them Portal by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

    Go out, get a few of 2 way (or better yet, 4 way) servers with 1+GB of ram and get them WebSphere Portal and a sys admin (hear you can get them cheap if you shop around) as a gift. Shouldn't cost more than $600,000 and if you act now, DB2 might be included. Happy Thanksgiving

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  222. MoveableType Spam vulnerability: mt-send-entry.cgi by slashd'oh · · Score: 1
    Funny, just after reading this thread, I happened upon a post to Jaque Distler's blog about a MoveableType vulnerability. Here is an excerpt:

    "As if comment spam were not bad enough, MovableType includes, in its default installation, a CGI script called mt-send-entry.cgi which -- you guessed it! -- can be used to send email anonymously to anyone in the world.

    And, no, this is not a merely theoretical issue; it's being actively exploited by spammers." There are more details, including a patch, in the blog posting.

  223. Yes you are the first, you Dork! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would your parents want a website.

  224. BANG by dfluke2 · · Score: 1

    You're Dead.

  225. try Moveable Type and Gallery by silent_l · · Score: 1

    try Moveable Type and Gallery

  226. Re:What are your suggestions for an xperimented us by romcabrera · · Score: 1

    thanx!

  227. Myfamily.com by Washizu · · Score: 2, Informative

    I come from a huge extended family and one of my cousins set up a site on MyFamily.com. It's not perfect and you won't have a lot of control, but it has a ton of features and is pretty easy to use.

    --
    OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
  228. Nucleus CMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is probably the best CMS out there, it's simple, and easy to style, or completely rebuild for that matter. It's kind of low budget on the outside, but the Admin area is more than adequate for someone who doesn't know what they're doing. go here: www.nucleuscms.com

  229. Movable Type is by far the easiest by drpentode · · Score: 1

    I personally use Movable Type for my web sites. My job site also uses it for project management. I've trained several computer illiterate users on how to use it, and they love it! It includes picture uploading, no HTML entry writing, and extremely powerful layout tools. Heck, if you don't like the way it comes out of the box, the MT web site has some spiffy templates, and more are available on the 'Net.

    It may require some work on your end, but almost no work on your parents' end. All you have to do is setup a bookmarklet or a shortcut, and your parents can happily blog all day long.

  230. Good Easy CMS by yourlink · · Score: 1

    Snippetmaster Pro snippetmaster.com uses PHP easy to setup and configure John Schuster Yourlink Web Services inc. www.yourlinkweb.com

    --
    www.loudernet.com
  231. FamilyCMS by ramannoodle · · Score: 1

    I'm currently rewriting an OpenSource solution to this exact problem (in Perl/Mod_Perl) called FamilyCMS. Because I'm trying to get it to a point where it isn't embarassing to post to the public, I haven't published any code yet, but you can keep tabs on it's progress at:

    http://projects.ldsoss.org/projects/familycms

    Send me an e-mail or reply to this post if you are interested in contributing - I need all the help I can get! I already have a working system that is just missing some features - I'm just working on a slight-redesign and a way to package it all for others to download and install. Code will be available soon!

  232. family email? by carbon3C · · Score: 1

    Anyone know a product that will allow members of my family view email from OE or from the web (using my own servers)?

  233. What about DotNetNuke by captainwtg · · Score: 1

    I've been using PostNuke for a while and I love it, but I recently found out about a .Net based, open source CMS called DotNetNuke . I think it is a bit more streamlined and easier to administer than PostNuke, plus my background is in asp, so it is a lot easier for me to write modules. One downside is that the current version only works with SQL Server, but the next version (supposedly due very soon) will support other DBs. It will also be skinnalble. There are also quite a few modules available for it, including a great photo gallery called TTT Gallery .

  234. Re: Mac, all the way! by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

    I take my camera everywhere also. I've never been kicked out (I've even taken it into movie theaters which is a no-no). I have had a couple of places wanting to know what's with the bag. Told one guy it was my purse. He just stammered as I walked past.

    I'd have thought an apple store would welcome an opportunity to let you see how easily your digicam interfaced with their stuff.

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  235. Free trial system for content management systems by TechStuff.ca · · Score: 1

    opensourceCMS.com has working installations of many php/mysql content management systems, so you can try before you install.

    I'd also like to echo others' recommendations of Six Apart's TypePad and Apple's .Mac for beginners. They're not cheap, but they're (nearly) idiot-proof.

    When Google bought Blogger, I expected to see a .Mac-like service develop, but it hasn't happened yet (and may never happen -- at least not until after their IPO).

    - opensourceCMS.com
    - TypePad
    - .Mac

  236. Re: Mac, all the way! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    That's more of the case when using MSFT products. In researching Apple products for using in an office environment, I've found that they've embraced open standards (ie Samba, LDAP, Kerberos, BSD) for basic infrastructure and then added their own polish for the interface. Aside from MS Office for OS X and GUI differences, I'm pretty sure I could swing between OS X and Linux on X86 pretty easily, given the same environment.

    Their hardware is no more proprietary than any other OEM, like Dell or Gateway...they just distinguish themselves by using PPC CPUs. Regardless, you can still run an open OS like Linux on a Mac or another PPC system like the Briq.

  237. wordpress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one mention wordpress.org. I think it's a pretty good blog also.

  238. Re: Mac, all the way! by lonb · · Score: 1

    You are mostly right in what you wrote in the first paragraph -- they do embrace more open standards (at least properly) than MSFT does. However, I totally disagree with your second paragraph. There is no comparison between the hardware of mac vs pc. You can easily yank your hard drive from a dell and through it in any other pc manufacturer and be pretty assured it will run. If you fight with Dell you can switch to ten other major manufacturers, or build your own. With apple, you are pretty well screwed. Especially with laptops.

    --
    "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
  239. Re: Mac, all the way! by exhilaration · · Score: 1

    Apple started using standard IDE drives several years back. There are no longer any compatibility issues - you can pop in your Windows drive and the Mac will be able to read the partitions.

  240. Re:What are your suggestions for an xperimented us by CharterTerminal · · Score: 1

    A while back, I experimented with several CMS packages. PHPNuke and PostNuke weren't appropriate for my needs, so I ruled those out immediately. I tried Grey Matter, and was pleased with its simplicity and flexibility. However, at the time it didn't come with templates (it may now; I don't know), which meant it was really only appropriate for people who wanted to design their website's look and feel from scratch.

    Movable Type was next. I liked MT's interface, which was very slick. However, it stored everything in binary files which, in my personal experience, became corrupted easily. Poof, no more blog. (I believe MT now has the ability to store posts in a MySQL database, which would make it easier to backup/restore website content.)

    In the end, I (and my users) went with PHPbb. It struck me as the "middle road" choice between GreyMatter and Movable Type. It has a lightweight GUI interface which lets you get in there and work under the hood if you want, or ignore all the techie stuff and just post your stories. Since it's written in PHP, it's also a simple matter to get in there and hack up the code to your liking.

    I haven't had any issues or complaints in about a year and a half of running five PHPbb sites. Caveat, though: from what I've heard, installation can be tricky if you don't have root access to your server.

  241. Free (as in Beer) Webhosting by ejunek · · Score: 1
    Zope's tricky, but for basic web hosting 1and1 web hosting is giving away 3 years of hosting for free. With this you get:
    • 500 Mbytes space
    • 5 Gb. transfer (.99 cents for every addtional Gb)
    • PHP
    • CGI
    • SSH
    • MySQL
    • $25 Google ad words voucher
    and you can register your own domain for $6 a year. I've been using it for a while and it's legit...they ask for your phone # to call you with a confirmation PIN number, but they never ask for your credit card. Drop $6 and get your family a domain, put up the content management system of your choice, and have it hosted free for 3 years.
  242. HTML Documents by jesboat · · Score: 1

    For the record, I actually do write my documents in HTML. Pure HTML 4.0 and CSS Level 2. It can get annoying at times, but it works, is completly cross-platform, and kinda fun.

  243. FWIW Edit-x by ayeco · · Score: 1

    There is also Edit-x.com

  244. Appropriate Gifts: by huckda · · Score: 1

    Okay is giving a website to your family who is computer ILLITERATE somewhat like giving a Ferrari to your 90 year old grandmother in a wheel chair?

    Well okay maybe that was a drastic comparison, but come on... give them something they might actually WANT and CAN use...i.e. gift certificates for some computer literacy classes...

    Just a thought =)

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  245. gallery.sourceforge.net by veg_all · · Score: 1

    Gallery is an amazingly easy to use photo-site management tool that even has a java drag-n-drop front end available (haven't actually used that yet, tho). My sister was uploading her own photos in one afternoon, and she calls IE "The Internet"

    --
    grammar-lesson free since 1999. (rescinded - 2005)
  246. NextEdit by feepness · · Score: 1

    NextEdit is a very simple (php based) web editor. It can do content areas as well as entire page edits.

    Designed _exactly_ for the not-quite-computer-iterate.

    And yes, I did work on it... :)

  247. Re: Mac, all the way! by jonhuang · · Score: 1

    Nah, it's weird indeed. With all due respect to the quality of their products, Apple tends to have a very "control" attitude.

    I talked to some employees about it. They said that everything in the store was copyrighted; in fact, one specifically said "we don't know what you're going to do with the pictures. they might end up on the internet or something" (paraphrased).

    I've taken the camera into theaters and whatnot as well, but their store is the only place I've been asked to leave (I didn't have a camera bag with me, so I guess I couldn't put it away). Well, there was that dinner club in HK where the busboy took it away, but that was semi-formal and my camera bag was made of duct tape.

    If you start shooting though, lots of places get strangely angry. From worst to least,

    1. Apple Stores
    2. Airport Security Checks.
    3. Starbucks
    4. Urban Outfitters

    well, #2 got as all searched. my bad.

  248. Simple Content Management System by miketuppen · · Score: 1

    I find Yabbse to be quite good for a simple BLOG/CMS. It is simple and looks good, yet you can add modules later on to make it more complex if you desire to. http://www.yabbse.org

  249. Re: on fair competition by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    This is a "straw dummy" arguement, really.
    Most people I know using a PC are using an environment based on "proprietary systems". The OS and software is mostly Microsoft, and your peripherals may become instant, expensive doorstops the next time MS does an OS upgrade and the vendors decide not to write updated drivers for them.

    Granted, Apple controls both the hardware and the OS - but their current OS is based on BSD Unix, which means much more opportunity for free or low-cost software alternatives than you have with the Microsoft solutions. You can always dump OS X entirely and run a PPC version of Linux, if you like, too.

    Besides, Apple has such a niche market-share (and always has, really) - they're much less likely to really screw you over than a dominant player in the market (like Dell, Microsoft or HP). They're less able to afford bad publicity.

    In my experience, Mac owners are much more picky and demanding than the average PC owner. Some of the anti-Apple rants I've heard are about Apple's failure to rectify situations that you'd be laughed right off the support hotline for bringing up to most PC makers. (Things like "My cooling fan isn't quiet enough! I shouldn't have to hear it at all in my dead silent room!")

  250. Re:Another blogsite: by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

    I made the hideous mistake of checking that link when the "Troll" moderation came up for metamod. Big mistake. THe Mozilla developers need to look at that one, cos I got a load of pop-ups.