Slashdot Mirror


Tempratech Self-Cooling Can

r.future writes "I saw on Gizmodo that a company called Tempratech has created an 100% safe and environmentally friendly aluminum can that uses a self-chilling process involving a cooling gel, desiccant, and heat sinks, to chill itself. The self-contained I.C. Can is the approximate size of a 500 mL beverage can. This includes the beverage container itself, and the integral self-chilling device, and according to Tempratech the can is 'proven to lower beverage temp by a minimum of 30 degrees Fahrenheit in only three minutes.'"

492 comments

  1. Conversion by ack154 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of us in the US:

    Google has the conversion.

    500 ml = 16.9070113 US fluid ounces

    1. Re:Conversion by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The self-contained I.C. Can is the approximate size of a 500 mL beverage can."

      'proven to lower beverage temp by a minimum of 30 degrees Fahrenheit in only three minutes.

      Congratulations! It's not often that a submission has the potential to ignite a metric vs imperial debate on both sides of the spectrum! For good measure let's debate the merits of the metric time system too! Three minutes = 180 seconds = headache to compute.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Conversion by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which would mean that this product would more likely be marketed to the makers of beer rather than the makers of soft drinks... as most soft drinks are found exclusively in bottles in all sizes above 12 oz.

      Besides, the increased cost would seem silly when attached to a soft drink can price, but would likely be more presentable for a "premium" beer brand not available any other way .

    3. Re:Conversion by camrdale · · Score: 1

      The can only holds 10.5 ounces of fluid.

      For those of us not in the US, Google says

      10.5 US fluid ounces = 310.522062 ml

    4. Re:Conversion by macz · · Score: 2, Funny
      Metric schmetric, to paraphrase Abe Simpson:

      "My car gets fourty rods to the hogshead and that's the way I like it"

      --
      ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
    5. Re:Conversion by ack154 · · Score: 1

      Touché, salesman...

    6. Re:Conversion by camrdale · · Score: 1

      The cost wouldn't necessarily be higher. Think of the savings in not having to have a chilled machine to sell them.

    7. Re:Conversion by Basehart · · Score: 1

      "Which would mean that this product would more likely be marketed to the makers of beer rather than the makers of soft drinks"

      Why the hell they don't put beer machines next to soda machines in parks and other public places is beyond me. There's no way kids would purchase beer, it's not sweet enough!

    8. Re:Conversion by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Said machine would still require a connection to power in order to run the money-accepting process. Besides, your home refrigerator keeps having to recool because people open the door so often, a vending machine by extention would cost less to operate because it rarely has its door fully opened.

      There's not not much to save there compared to the cost of the special cans...

    9. Re:Conversion by unixbum · · Score: 1
      For those of you NOT in the US: 30F = 16.66C
      The oracle of Google says otherwise; 30 degrees Fahrenheit = -1.11111111 degrees Celsius
    10. Re:Conversion by BlitzPig_Sal · · Score: 1

      You should never store beer at room temperature or above as that will permanently ruin the taste.

    11. Re:Conversion by Alyred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think he converted the wrong way or something... I mean, 30 is 2 degrees below freezing, and freezing at celsius is 0 degrees...

    12. Re:Conversion by JamieKitson · · Score: 0
      For those of us *outside* the US:

      a change of 30 degrees Fahrenheit = a change of 16ish degrees Centigrade

    13. Re:Conversion by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

      American Pint of beer = 473ml
      European standard beer = 500ml
      British Pint of beer = 568ml

      Which prooves that Europe is better then America, and the UK trouces you all!

      (Apart from Germany that regularly have 1l (34 fluid ounce) glasses)

    14. Re:Conversion by RLW · · Score: 1

      For those of you in Iraq or Texas, When the ambient temperature is 120 F your coke will be 90. That's better than 120 but jeepers. There needs to be a Super IC that cools at least 50 or 60 off the ambient temp.

    15. Re:Conversion by boskone · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but if you just use dimensional analysis, any conversion is easy. This was one of the best takeaways from freshman chemistry...

      http://wine1.sb.fsu.edu/chm1045/notes/Intro/Dima na l/Dimanal.htm

    16. Re:Conversion by camrdale · · Score: 4, Interesting

      connection to power in order to run the money-accepting process

      The power required for cooling is MUCH greater than the power required to make change

      There's not not much to save there compared to the cost of the special cans

      I don't know how much the cans will cost, but the price reduction of mass production can be HUGE. Don't underestimate it.

    17. Re:Conversion by Spock+the+Vulcan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The temperature is supposed to go down BY 30 degrees Fahrenheit, not TO 30 degrees Fahrenheit. A 1 Fahrenheit drop in temperature is equal to a 5/9 degree Celsius drop. Thus, a 30 F change = 30 * 5/9 = 16.67 C.

    18. Re:Conversion by OkanGuney · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No that would be -1.1 C

    19. Re:Conversion by parksie · · Score: 5, Funny

      U.S. pints are only 473ml? No wonder you all seem to be able to hold your liquor, you're cheating!

    20. Re:Conversion by Aardpig · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know about you, but if you just use dimensional analysis, any conversion is easy.

      I'm always suspicious of dimensional analysis -- judging from the number of crackpot theories which are built on it, it appears to be the calculus of the loon.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    21. Re:Conversion by Geraden · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's 30 degrees fahrenheit of DIFFERENCE, not an absolute temperature of 30 degrees fahrenheit.

      Using your google conversion...

      60F = 15.5555556C
      30F = -1.11111111C

      15.5555556 - (-1.11111111) = 16.6666667

    22. Re:Conversion by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And 3 minutes is approximately 149microfortnights.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    23. Re:Conversion by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 30F = 16.666C figure represents the degree of change. 30F = -1.111C represents the conversion of a specific temperature.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    24. Re:Conversion by putamare · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Actually, not only does 30F not equal 16.66C NOT in the US, but is does not equal 16.66C NOT NOT in the US as well. This might really bake your noodle, but 32F = 0C both NOT in the US and NOT NOT in the US (or in the US, depending on how you look at it); the conversion is the same irrespective of location.

    25. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No that would be -1.1 C"

      So what you're saying is that in F, this can will help the beverage drop 30 degrees, but in C, it will drop -1.1 degrees?

      In F: 80F - 30F = 50F
      In C: 30C - -1.1C = 31.1C

      I'm sure glad I don't use C. My can actually gets hotter!

    26. Re:Conversion by red+floyd · · Score: 5, Funny

      it appears to be the calculus of the loon.

      So it's worth about $1CDN?

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    27. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      For good measure let's debate the merits of the metric time system too!

      I would, but that would take several kiloseconds. I'll get back to you in a couple milliyears.

    28. Re:Conversion by Politburo · · Score: 1

      a vending machine by extention would cost less to operate because it rarely has its door fully opened.

      True, but not all vending machines are located in a climate controlled environment. Outdoor machines in the summer months run almost constantly so that the little LED screen can say "Cool! 38(deg)F".

    29. Re:Conversion by Greg+K+Nicholson · · Score: 1

      And for those of us in Europe, 30 degrees Fahrenheit = 16 2/3 degrees Celsius.

    30. Re:Conversion by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      American can or bottle of beer - 12 fluid onces = 355ml.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    31. Re:Conversion by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      some beers are meant to be drunk warm.

    32. Re:Conversion by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! It's not often that a submission has the potential to ignite a metric vs imperial debate on both sides of the spectrum!

      Eh, they're probably British. Gas by the Litre, speed limits in MPH, beer by the pint, and weight by the stone. God I love those guys!

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    33. Re:Conversion by Auckerman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The funny thing about this, I think MOST americans can't think in fluid ounces (since it's not cups, pints or quarts) and would probabally find mL a more useful measurement.

      --

      Burn Hollywood Burn
    34. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps American beer is stronger than the European stuff, so you guys need more of it? ;) Which reminds me of my favorite saying: Canadian beer is so strong cause their women are so damn ugly. :D

    35. Re:Conversion by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      Each degree Celsius equals 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit. The systems are also define zero degrees at different points, 32 degrees Fahrenheit apart. Thus, if it is 30 degrees Fahrenheit outside, it is (30 - 32) / 1.8 = -1.11111 degrees Celsius.

      However, for relative temperatures, only the first sentence of the above matters: Each degree Celsius equals 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Thus this device cools things by 30 / 1.8 = 16.67 degrees Celsius.

      If you're still not convinced, consider this. Say the fan in my computer breaks, and the CPU is 90 degrees Fahrenheit hotter than it should be. Under your conversion value, in Celsius it has cooled down by 3.33 degrees.

    36. Re:Conversion by TCaptain · · Score: 1

      You mean there's something out there weaker than yellow dyed water?

      --
      "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
    37. Re:Conversion by JensLH · · Score: 2, Funny

      So "the approximate size of a 500 mL" is "the approximate size of 16.9070113 US fluid ounces"? :-)

    38. Re:Conversion by Phelan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Uhm no

      30 Fahrenheit is -1 Celcius.

      --
      "Nimis exaltatus rex sedet in vertice - caveat ruinam!"
    39. Re:Conversion by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Informative

      Eh, they're probably British. Gas by the Litre, speed limits in MPH, beer by the pint, and weight by the stone.

      But temperatures in celsius... (mostly) oh, and these days, you tend to buy weighed goods by the kg, although yeah, we still weigh ourselves in stones and pounds.

    40. Re:Conversion by ack154 · · Score: 1

      I don't know. For beverages, I think in units of 12 oz cans (and even some 8 oz cans now), 16 oz bottles, 20 oz bottles, 24 oz bottles... and then it moves into 1 liter, 2 liter, 3 liter, etc.

      For all other similar measurements, I may think in quarts, gallons, etc. But for most beverages/soft drinks (exceptions of milk/oj/etc) I think in ounces.

    41. Re:Conversion by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      BTW, standard coke cans are 12 oz.

      "fun size" cans are 8 oz.

      The manufacturer's info indicates that this can, though ~17 oz in volume, contains 10 oz of liquid. That means the cooling apparatus must occupy a little over 6 oz...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    42. Re:Conversion by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1
      Beer was brewed for thousands of years before refrigeration. People didn't seem to mind.

      You shouldn't store beer which has been cold at room temperature. That will surely ruin the taste!

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    43. Re:Conversion by Khasmo · · Score: 1

      Beer keeps better when stored cold. I'm not sure that I'd want to buy a beer that had been stored at room temp for the past 2 months. Of course this happens a lot anyway, but some stores are good about keeping their beer shipped and stored cool.

      That said, if there's a way to make sure the cooling process didn't freeze the liquid inside the can, it'd be a great way to always have a nice ice cold beer at a tailgater, picnic or camping trip without having to over stuff the cooler with ice.

    44. Re:Conversion by laigle · · Score: 1

      Errr.. huh? I could have sworn a pint's a pound (16 fl oz) the whole world round. Is this just the standard beer serving size, or do we actually use different volumetric measurements?

    45. Re:Conversion by merlin_jim · · Score: 2, Informative

      A shortcut to convert difference in farenheit to difference in celsius is to add 32 to the farenheit difference...

      30 + 32 = 62F = 16.6666667C

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    46. Re:Conversion by Ioldanach · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And for those of us outside the US, can is slang for a urinal. So this company produced a self cooling urinal, cause you know how slippery those things can get when you've been sitting on it for a while and start sweating.

      Which has yet another meaning to those in the US. In the US, the urinal is what a male uses standing up. You don't sit on one. Now, a toilet you sit on, so to treat it as US slang he created a tiny self cooling toilet.

    47. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30 Fahrenheit is -1 Celcius.

      If you're expecting this can to bring the temperature of its contents down to 30F (or -1.1C), you're in for some disappointment. If, however, you're paying attention and expecting the temperature to drop by 30F (or 16.6C), then you're being slightly more realistic.

      I don't know about you, but I certainly wouldn't pay extra for a can that lowered my drink's temperature by -1.1C, effectively making it warmer.

    48. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how do we activate such a device?

    49. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, not only does 30F not equal 16.66C NOT in the US, but is does not equal 16.66C NOT NOT in the US as well. This might really bake your noodle, but 32F = 0C both NOT in the US and NOT NOT in the US (or in the US, depending on how you look at it); the conversion is the same irrespective of location.

      Actually, not only are you unable to follow the conversation with the rest of us in the US, but you also can't follow the conversation with us NOT in the US. This might really bake your noodle, but the can isn't dropping the teperature TO 30F, but rather dropping it BY 30F. And 30F of difference, does, in fact, equal 16.6C of difference. Taken completely out of context, the post would have been incorrect. But, for those of us paying attention, it made perfect sense. Your inability to follow the conversation with the rest of us is the same irrespective of location.

    50. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who in hell drinks liquor in pints??

    51. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. It's -1 1/9 Celsius.

      F = 9/5 * C + 32

      C = 5/9 * (F - 32)

      I checked it with Google to be sure.

    52. Re:Conversion by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a loo or bog - of course that would be england/sctoland respectively - not neccessarily the rest of europe

      --
      ymmv
    53. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. After rereading the text, I realize now that I misread it. I offer my most humble apologies.

    54. Re:Conversion by operagost · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's not a pint. The American pint as served in a bar mug or "pounder" can is usually 16 ounces.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    55. Re:Conversion by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      This is why in my high school physics class, our teacher was very particular that we expressed a temperature measurement as 30 degrees Celcius, versus a temperature change as 30 Celcius degrees. It was a standard that helped to keep things straight when we were reading questions on tests and such.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    56. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Britian RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Sorry, but we do.

    57. Re:Conversion by Xepo · · Score: 1

      So this device makes the can -1 1/9 degrees colder? That doesn't make any sense. We're talking relative degrees, not absolute...skip the (+/-)32 step.

      30 degrees fahrenheit = 16 degrees celsius

    58. Re:Conversion by parksie · · Score: 1

      Never met the Irish, then?

      That said, I used "liquor" in place of "any generic alcoholic drink" because it was simpler.

    59. Re:Conversion by MyHair · · Score: 1

      In the U.S. we don't order "pints". Mostly it's 22 oz. glasses of beer. Then there's "the yard"....

    60. Re:Conversion by notsoanonymouscoward · · Score: 1

      my suggestion to you: drink heavily. oh and move to tokyo. beer vending machines =)

      --
      I ate my sig.
    61. Re:Conversion by fred911 · · Score: 1

      ""fun size" cans are 8 oz."

      Let us not forget the more fun 6.5 oz size as the Starbucks DoubleShot is sold.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    62. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, apparently, in spelling.

    63. Re:Conversion by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but 12 oz. cans in the US are bigger than 12 oz. cans in the UK. And the US fluid ounce (along the rest of our volume measurements) has been more consistent over the past century or two than either the UK version or the litererere. So *pbbbttt* to you, too!

      <RANT>
      And another thing that bugs me about daily use of the metric system is the insistance on measuring things in mL instead of cL or even dL. Saying that your beer stein is "500 mL" suggests an accuracy to the nearest mL. Would you notice (let alone care) if you were served 499 mL of beer instead? What about 490 mL?
      </RANT>

    64. Re:Conversion by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      Did you know those vending machines shut off at 1:00 am? Or whatever the time is. I can't remember. I lived there in the 80s. Seth

    65. Re:Conversion by afidel · · Score: 1

      True, a "Tall" is generally between 22 and 24oz US. That works out to 650-710ml or bigger than a UK pint or European standard beer. That's the standard beer for people I know =) Just the right balance between trips to the bar and keeping the beer at acceptable temp.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    66. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was either Quarts or Gallons.

    67. Re:Conversion by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, but that's not a pint. The American pint as served in a bar mug or "pounder" can is usually 16 ounces.


      Most places around here (Colorado) will sell you a shaker glass as a 'pint'. While these might hold a pint when filled to the rim, owing to the shape (what ever a rotated trapezoid solid is called) you would be lucky to actually be served 14 oz.

      This is where our EU friends have the advantage; their bar glasses are required by law to have a calibrated fill line on them.
    68. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What (or where) the hell is this "European standard" anyway?

      Here the standard size of "long" in bar seems to be puny 400ml.

    69. Re:Conversion by Chasuk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      OFF-TOPIC POST

      Does anyone else remember the series by Stephen R. Donaldson, The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever, and its sequel series, The Second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant?

      Well, its being continued in The Last Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, and the first volume (of four) comes out on 14 October 2004! Read an excerpt here

      I've submitted this twice, but the powers-that-be aren't well-read enough to recognise it as newsworthy.

    70. Re:Conversion by tomthebomb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sitting on a urinal?

      Crazy Europeans.

    71. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave it to the marketing weenies to use the measurement system that produces the bigger numbers.

    72. Re:Conversion by parksie · · Score: 1

      Damn, you got me.

      Although, I think this person has found the only way to take Creme de Menthe without retching...

    73. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pah! Amateurs! An Australian pint of beer is always 1000ml. No Australian would be seen dead drinking less than a litre in one go!

    74. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the accepted standard is to use Celsius for change in temperature and Kelvin for measurments.

    75. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSW Aus.

      middy = 285ml, 10oz
      schooner = 425ml, 15oz
      Pint = 568ml, 20oz
      Jug = 1140ml, 40oz

      Other states
      http://www.cooperspubs.com/glass_sizes_aussie.htm

    76. Re:Conversion by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Beer was brewed for thousands of years before refrigeration. People didn't seem to mind.

      They did mind.
      They had to have a drink to take their mind off it.

    77. Re:Conversion by Duc+de+Montebello · · Score: 1

      ... but in the UK you don't chill your beer so this comment is a bit off-topic?

      Man lifting those German steins are good exercise.

      --
      "If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes should fall like a house of cards. Checkmate." - Zapp Brannigan
    78. Re:Conversion by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      For those of us in the US:
      500 ml = 16.9070113 US fluid ounces


      I'm a scientist, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    79. Re:Conversion by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Is celcius even part of the metric standard? And if anything, wouldn't the metric unit be Kelvin anyway?
      I always thought of temperature units as being separate from weight/mass/distance...

    80. Re:Conversion by chaoaretasty · · Score: 1

      Those of us weighing in by the kilo is growing though.

    81. Re:Conversion by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      While the can is the -size- of a 16 fluid ounce can, it only contains 10 fluid ounces of cooled liquid.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
    82. Re:Conversion by pecko666 · · Score: 1

      For those of us NOT in the US: 30 degrees of fahrenheit is 16.6 degrees of Celsius

    83. Re:Conversion by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Canada too - at least if the bar calls it a pint, it must meet the legal definition of a pint.

      The CBC radio show "Definitely Not The Opera" interviewed one of the guys from the Bureau, and he explained that yes - you can file a complaint that a pint you were served was not a pint, and they will come out, measure it, and if it's short, fine the establishment $500.

    84. Re:Conversion by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      And another thing that bugs me about daily use of the metric system is the insistance on measuring things in mL instead of cL or even dL.

      In France, and I think across much of mainland Europe, they generally use cl. Since the pound's pretty strong at the moment, a lot of smaller shops in .uk are buying Coca-Cola from continental wholesalers rather than direct from the bottling plant, which is quite amusing: the single market trumps corporate price-fixing, so I for one welcome our new Brussels overlords! As a result we see a lot of drinks sold with German or French labelling, and quantity in cl instead of ml.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    85. Re:Conversion by monsted · · Score: 1

      I had a Budweiser Budvar (no, not the .us crap) last night that was labelled 500 ml, 50 cl, 0.5 l. Nice and easy if you find the metric system so hard - and the beer is quite good too :)

    86. Re:Conversion by monsted · · Score: 1

      The metric system gets really fun when you start handing in reports using units like "attoparsec per microfortnight" (about 2.6 cm/second). The results are technically correct, but a pain to score :)

    87. Re:Conversion by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I did three science A Levels (maths, physics, chemistry) and a physics degree, and yet I still can't quite shake the habit of weighing myself in stones and pounds. I can convert it to kg if necessary, but I don't know it off the top of my head. Same for my height, actually; feet and inches, but I can convert to m/cm if necessary.

    88. Re:Conversion by bokmann · · Score: 1

      You mean Alton Brown LIED to me? What happened to "A pints a pound the world around"?

    89. Re:Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i drink beer from a keg, pints are for the weak

  2. OFR: Obligatory Futurama Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    $ whois tempratech.com ...
    Tempra Technology Inc.
    6140 15th Street East
    Bradenton, FL 34203
    US ...


    Quick, someone in Bradenton order a pizza for I.C. Can, and send it to Tempratech!

    http://www.gotfuturama.com/Multimedia/EpisodeSound s/1ACV01/04.mp3

    1. Re:OFR: Obligatory Futurama Reference by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      LOL! This is what you get when you go to your link:

      Sorry, you aren't allowed to access that.
      The webmasters were notified about this.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:OFR: Obligatory Futurama Reference by casuist99 · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's because, like every good webmaster with limited bandwidth, gotfuturama blocks slashdot referrals. Try copying the link and requesting it directly - nice site.

    3. Re:OFR: Obligatory Futurama Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  3. self heating soup? by jabella · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought this was going to be from the Self-heating Soup can guys, but it's not.

    This one seems a little more real (not a case study), as the company already has some temp technology products that are further along... Also, the Gizmodo link says it holds 10oz.

    1. Re:self heating soup? by SnowDeath · · Score: 1

      The IC Can holds 10oz of beverage and total size is about 16 ounces.

    2. Re:self heating soup? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      This one seems a little more real (not a case study), as the company already has some temp technology products that are further along

      I don't know about the rest of the world, but here in the UK you don't have to look very hard to find a self-heating can of coffee/tea alongside the Coke and milkshakes. I guess a self-cooling can could work too but when the drinks come out of a fridge anyway it seems a litte redundant.

    3. Re:self heating soup? by IronMagnus · · Score: 1

      Yes, redundant indeed! I mean, who would bother to make a self-cooling can when you can just put the drinks in the fridge!! Of what possible use could this can be? Only way I can see it being useful is when there are no fridges around... but then again I guess thats the whole point, huh?

    4. Re:self heating soup? by jabella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      then again, think about it like this. say you're camping. the best coolers that you can get (without spending $400+ on a cooler) will keep stuff cold for 5 days in 90 degree weather. you need to put a LOT of ice in it, and it's going to be big, and heavy.

      or you could just carry a 12 pack of this, without the cooler. it's quite a big difference....

      then again, i just bring water when i camp, and i don't care if it's cold so it wouldn't matter much to me.

    5. Re:self heating soup? by kimmo · · Score: 1
      But then you would have to carry both the drinks and a lot of ice. I suggest you freeze all the beer and put it on the bottom, with other food (and stuff which shouldn't be frozen) on top.

      Tada! Stays frozen for days and no extra weight. You only have to remember and get enough cans out to melt again once the camp is all set, otherwise no beer for you for a long time :)

      Trust me, this works fine and the beer is good even after freezing, although usually you would drink anything that's cold in those conditions.

    6. Re:self heating soup? by bvdbos · · Score: 1

      I've been looking for these for years now, ever since nestle announced these. Anyone know where to get these in Holland or online?

  4. WOWOWOW by foshizzlemynizzle · · Score: 0

    in the words of homer simpson, mmmmmmmmmmmmMMMmmm, cold frosty beer, aghghgahghaghaghagh

  5. Isn't this the same as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... those materials you mix to get an extremely endothermic reaction? And what about the reaction byproducts?

    1. Re:Isn't this the same as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Jackass, RTFA - it uses simple evaporation

    2. Re:Isn't this the same as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, mod grandparent down

  6. That'll be a bitch to recycle. by paanta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its not going to be real easy to recycle now, is it? Or can they melt the whole thing down, desiccant and all? Seems unlikely.

    1. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fantastic point. I know there used to be a canteen and thermos that kept beverages colder (or hotter) like 5 times longer than a normal thermos, and got rid of the 'metally' or 'plasticy' tastes. But it wasn't at all recyclable, so the whole project was dropped.

      I think that if it ain't recyclable, its a cool experiment at most.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by garcia · · Score: 1

      Strange as it may sound, for the first time in 5 years I have moved to a place that has recycling. Perhaps other places wouldn't have a problem with this can because they don't have mandatory recycling?

    3. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by paanta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On the other hand, a lot of desiccants are recycleable. You can pop them into an oven to dry the material out. Still, there's a lot of infrastructure behind the traditional aluminum can recycling schtick. I guess maybe this would be most appropriate for fancy (expensive) things anyway, like maybe a nice bottle (er, can?) of white wine. :) Don't expect to see it in your 50 cent can of coke. Damn. That should be it's, not its, up there. Beware the grammar police.

    4. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      So much for 100% environmentally friendly ;). I'll buy the environmentally friendly argument once they find a way to make cans out of hemp ;)

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    5. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by RLW · · Score: 1

      Ha ha! Recycle and have warm beer, don't recycle and get cold beer!

    6. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Recycling isn't "mandatory" for most people. You can toss those cans in the trash if you want, even if your neighborhood has curbside pickup. However, people recycle because they want to reserve natural resources and reduce growing landfills.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    7. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by shufler · · Score: 1

      You know, fridges still exist.

    8. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I understand the stainless steel vacuum thermoses do not impart significant flavor to beverages, and in fact can keep beverages cool for long periods of time. If SS isn't good enough for you, Nissan (makers of the world's finest vacuum thermoses) also makes a Titanium model, but it's extremely expensive as you might suspect.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recycling isn't "mandatory" for most people. You can toss those cans in the trash if you want, even if your neighborhood has curbside pickup. However, people recycle because they want to reserve natural resources and reduce growing landfills.

      Very true but areas that have curbside pickup make it much easier to be a part of the whole recycling "thing".

    10. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I worked for a while with dessicants, and many of them are mostly silica, or aluminosilicates... the main components in regular sand or common dust. It's not quite that simple, but it is quite stable and harmless. Actually, a while ago, the beverage industry considered using desiccants to trap CO2 to make instant bubbly drinks. It was going to be kind of like dropping an alka-seltzer in a glass to put the fizz in it. Again, totally safe to drink. Too bad the manufacturing of such tablet was costly. The patent on that I think has already expired so knock yourselves out trying to make a company out of that.
      Now, about recycling it. Yes, you can just melt the thing. The dessicant components will definetly not melt so they could be filtered out fairly easily.

    11. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Orne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny you mention that, since Aluminum recycling is one of the few materials that are actually cost-effective to recycle vs produce from raw ore. Most things, like PET plastic use more energy in the recycling process than manufacturing the things from scratch (once you include sorting and transportation costs, which are not insignificant).

    12. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Politburo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, a lot of desiccants are recycleable. You can pop them into an oven to dry the material out.

      You're not thinking about recycling fully. While getting a virgin or near-virgin material back is a good goal, many other factors must be considered. Such as: energy required to recycle back to near-virgin material, energy required to create virgin material (from the ground, other materials, however it is acquired), amount of virgin material (or constituents) available, etc.

      While dessicant may be easily recycled, it may not be worth it. Burning a bunch of oil, coal and gas to dry it out may harm the environment more than just tossing it in a landfill. However, if the raw materials to make dessicant are non-sustainable/limited, then recycling becomes beneficial again.

    13. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Naffer · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the production of aluminum is extremely energy demanding. It's cheaper to recycle scrap aluminum then smelt the brand new stuff from bauxite.

    14. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I guess maybe this would be most appropriate for fancy (expensive) things anyway, like maybe a nice bottle (er, can?) of white wine. :)

      Good point. There's not much that's more recyclable than a glass bottle.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    15. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Its not going to be real easy to recycle now, is it?"

      Perhaps not, but then wasteful packaging has never slowed down the marketing machine much before.

    16. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Most things, like PET plastic use more energy in the recycling process than manufacturing the things from scratch (once you include sorting and transportation costs, which are not insignificant).

      On the other hand, it should also be noted that most plastics are derived from petroleum products--and acquiring petroleum products has been getting both more expensive and more bloody of late.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    17. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that landfills are a serious issue, mind you that a 20X40 mile valley filled a mile deep with trash would be the entire garbage output of the united states for 1,000 years.

      When you think about things and look at the scale of it, you realize we're not going to run out of landfill space. The planet is not overcrowded, and we always say were going to run out of oil but then ever year the known reserves worldwide continue to increase at a rate greater than the increase in consumption. Plus look into our forms of alternative energy, particularly nuclear.

      Where I live every day I get more radiation exposure from the ground in the form of Radon than people living next to waste storage facilities.

      I agree in the past nuclear has had some bad practices, we've learned and are doing better now.

      At this point in time I just don't worry about it. I look at the situation and things are in control, and aren't getting out of hand.

    18. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My God, you must be new here. Don't you know the earth is damn near being destroyed by us horrible humans (at least according to slashthink)??

    19. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by tliet · · Score: 1

      That's why a mandatory bottle return system, where you bring the bottles back so the can be used again, should make sense.

      Of course, that would put some strain on the distribution system, but hey, an empty truck that goes from the supermarket to the distribution point oculd always take some crates with empty bottles back.

      Hell, it used to work in the Netherlands. Until the Euro, then the deposit money was lowerd to 25 cents so it didn't make sense to bring the bottles back. And from what I understand is that our current government has completely sold out to the packaging industry by ditching the mandatory return system for a voluntarily one.

    20. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by espressojim · · Score: 1

      What's it cost to keep making room for all the crap we generate? Is that included in your costs?

      My brother is an enviornmental engineer, and he's moving a freakin' river to make more room for a waste disposal site. They aren't moving the river 5 feet for a few yards, either. This is a major redirection, to clear out more space, to throw more crap.

      I bet that costs a few bucks.

    21. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      I don't know how things are handled were you live, but around these parts, PET bottles are not recycled, they're just washed thorougly and reused. And hardy enough to go trough multiple iterations before they go out (and even then, it's probably more because they start to get scratchy, as in ugly, than any real unusability)

      once you include sorting and transportation costs, which are not insignificant

      Are you claiming there are no transportation costs for newly manufactured bottles? They just teleport themselves to the bottlers from factory, with no energy usage?

    22. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The cost of simple disposal is almost always less than the cost of recycling, assuming some general things (no massive site contamination or other hazwaste, etc.). However, it's interesting that your brother is involved with such a project. Where is he located? Here on the east coast, we've generally run out of room for trash, but we are shipping it west, rather than trying to make more space here. Moving a river for a waste area seems even more backwards. I'm surprised any environmental official approved that project.

    23. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      I plan to soon announce my 'Fizzy' tablet-based Athlon cooler. After I work out the bugs and the case mods.

    24. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to insinuate that someone is being stupid, please try not to be stupid yourself -- think a little.

      In the case of recycling, the bottles need to be transported to the factory from incredibly numerous trash containers placed all around the country. This is an expensive distributed operation. In the case of a new bottle, the raw materials are transported in bulk fairly cheaply.

      Both types of bottles incur identical factory-to-consumer transportation costs, so that cancels out.

      If the bottle can be reused locally or semi-locally the costs are much lower, of course. That part of your argument holds up if it is true. This document suggests that it is not a standard practice.

    25. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      If you're going to insinuate that someone is being stupid, please try not to be stupid yourself -- think a little.

      Sorry, I am not aware of recycling habits of other nations. Guess generalizing doesn't pay off.

      In the case of recycling, the bottles need to be transported to the factory from incredibly numerous trash containers placed all around the country. This is an expensive distributed operation.

      Which is something I didn't take into account, because the system I'm used to doesn't work that way. Bottles and cans have a slight deposit fee in them, and you return them to the shop. Not only does it significantly reduce the number of sites you need to transport from and help a lot with sorting (part of which can already be done in the store), but as another poster mentioned, you can utilize same traffic that brings in the full bottles to take old ones back to the factory, it'd go back there anyway so transport costs are almost nothing.

      Of course there's always a downside to everything, and you might not get all the bottles back, especially if the fee is not well balanced, too cheap and people will throw it in trash anyway, too expensive and someone will come up with non-returnable version.

    26. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by woobieman29 · · Score: 1

      I can see it now.....drink the beer, then smoke the can! Twice the bang for your buck!

      --
      \/\/oobie
    27. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, dump those plastic bottles in a thermal depolymerizer and convert it to fuel. If you need more plastic, can the resulting light oil be converted to plastic? (Yes, I know there are "plastic" materials also available from plants)

    28. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      I wonder what will happen when we start throwing transparent aluminum containers in recycling bins. Will aluminum cans get varying levels of transparency? Probably not, I expect the material is fully melted and in the process heated well beyond the sintering temperatures used to assemble transparent aluminum. Maybe the rare earths in the mix would be a problem.

    29. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      That's the nice thing about manufacturing -- there is so much virgin material.
      .
      .
      .
      Or do I just have a dirty mind?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    30. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by Naffer · · Score: 1

      Mining the stuff is probably a bitch too, not to mention the fact that 35% of it (the largest percentage) comes from Australia of all places.

    31. Re:That'll be a bitch to recycle. by ultramk · · Score: 1

      You're not thinking about recycling fully. While getting a virgin or near-virgin material back is a good goal, many other factors must be considered. Such as: energy required to recycle back to near-virgin material, energy required to create virgin material (from the ground, other materials, however it is acquired), amount of virgin material (or constituents) available, etc.

      This is slashdot. Virgin material is everywhere.

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  7. Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless this new way off chilling doesn't significantly affect the price of a given can of soda, I don't see it going anywhere.

    If it's bulkier and more expensive what incentive do people have for purchasing a drink stored in such a can?

    1. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      surely not having to pay for refridgeration is going to cut prices, maybe enough to cover the cost for consumers-?

    2. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Alyred · · Score: 1

      That I can keep a case of them in my garage, pull one out, and drink it cold, without taking up any of my refrigerator space, or keep paying electricity to keep it cold until I want one.

    3. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by (trb001) · · Score: 1

      Beer at tailgates. You inevitably run out of ice, and the beer gets warm sitting 100+ degree temperatures. These could be great for that purpose.

      --trb

    4. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't buy your own beverage that comes in cans...

      Nearly all canned products do not require refrigeration in transit, and can be stored at room temperature without any problem. They can be safely consumed at room temperature as well, but are more enjoyable if cooled. Therefore, only the end consumer needs to chill the can if the product is not being purchased for immediate use.

    5. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Astadar · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Have to agree. For the technology to take off they'd have to get Coke/Pepsi/other large beverage maker to buy in just to get the cost per unit down.

      They'll no doubt also draw the ire of Greenpeace and their ilk since it doesn't seem that these will be recyclable or environmentally friendly.

      While a nifty idea, I think the cost to market will be prohibitive, even at 5 cents a can it'll be really hard to justify unless you're in the desert somewhere (in which case the mark-up will be significantly higher than a nickel).

      --
      --Coming up with something clever... please wait...
    6. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Freidner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, there's hunting, fishing, tailgate parties, BBQ's. If I can have a cold can of Dr. Pepper out in the woods or on the lake where a fridge is out of the question and a cooler is problematic, then why not pay a little extra for some convenience?

    7. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      That would be true... if sodas had to be refrigerated. As it is, they are tossed in just prior to retail, and the bulk are sold unrefrigerated. Thus there is very little cost to refrigeration prior to the consumer buying them (and plenty of people just use ice).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      I know it's a little alien to my fellow geeks but... Pretty much any time you do an all-day outdoor event (BBQ, picnic, camping), these would be nice. After a day of hiking out in the middle of nowhere, a cold can of Mt. Dew would be wonderful (but nearly impossible).

      So, while not going to be very popular during the winters around here, I suspect there'd be a distinct advantage come the 4th of July.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    9. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do relaize that 100 - 30 = 70 degree beer hmmm ice chest sounds like not such a bad deal.

    10. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by trilks · · Score: 1

      It would have to be marketed for special purposes, like the mentioned tail-gating, or camping or something. Otherwise, its much cheaper, and not that much harder, to just keep it in the fridge.

      --
      You won't hate yourself in the morning if you don't get up before noon.
    11. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Where do you tailgate in 100+ temps??

      Were I go you generally have to throw the beer on the fire to keep it from turning into ice.

      On the other hand this is a cool idea.

      All day out in the boat, you don't need the ice very good.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    12. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by avronius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that you've hit the nail on the head here. The amount of energy required to constantly refrigerate a beverage vs. the cost required to 'instantly' make a non-refrigerated beverage cold.

      Additionally, people who are mobile would find enormous benefit. A can of "water" or sports drink on a hot day of cycling would be well worth the $.50 surcharge that this market might expect.

      However, if the surcharge is greater than 50% of the current market price, it may not fly.

    13. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      out...what? :P

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    14. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by bookemdano63 · · Score: 1

      Ever put a soda in your car on a hot day? Even if it doesn't explode it will definitely be undrinkable.

    15. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I realize this may be a difficult to comprehend idea, but there are a few places that play a game similar to football in places besides Green Bay and Chicago.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    16. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by JDevers · · Score: 1

      As far as that goes, even in Green Bay and Chicago only the last half of the season is even cold. September and October is generally fairly warm anywhere in the continental US (obviously not including some locations in the Rockies...).

      Obviously by the end of the season it is cold everywhere but the desert southwest, Florida, and southern Texas but the best tailgating is always at the beginning of the season for most teams anyway. Everyone thinks they were massively underrated and "this is the year!." By the end of the season,reality has set in and the parties aren't quite as good ;)

    17. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but "tailgate" doesn't even have to imply "football". Baseball games, which occur during the peak of summer, also have tailgating.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    18. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      What is this "outdoor" of which you speak? Is it where the legendary "daystar" or "yellow face" lives?

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    19. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live that cans explode in your car? I've seen it happen when frozen since water expands by around 9-10% when frozen but I would assume you have to get to a boil to make it explode. With all the sugar and other crap in there that is surely more than 212F (100C).

    20. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      The first games you're always trying to sit in the shade and drink (to stay cool). Toward the end of the season you're trying to stay near the grill and drink (to provide antifreeze).

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    21. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amount of energy required to constantly refrigerate a beverage

      That would be zero. My fridge runs whether I have a beverage in it or not (my other food prefers it that way) and even without a fridge a good bucket of ice water or even a nearby river or lake (when out camping) can do the job.

      As for sports drinks and water - those are best drank a little warmer than your average soda. Drinking something "ice" cold while exercising is really not good for you. The water bottle on my bike actually does a pretty good job of staying cool for a couple hours.

    22. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Here's a trick for you. Fill a cooler with ice AND water. Settle the beer down in the cooler. Make sure you close the lid when not removing beer. Unless you are tailgating for weeks at a time you should be ok even tailgating at Arizona State in September.

    23. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      . Otherwise, its much cheaper, and not that much harder, to just keep it in the fridge.

      Well, that really depends - if I'm out and about, I can't carry a fridge with me. I might, however, be able to carry a couple of these cans around, and not have to worry about them warming up while I'm out.

    24. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      If it's bulkier and more expensive what incentive do people have for purchasing a drink stored in such a can?
      To cool their drink?
      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    25. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... maybe it could be used to "recharge" thermoses for such things like preserving insulin on an extended camping trip, or a heat-activated system to keep other temperature-sensitve stuff from warming up in the event of refrigerator failure.

    26. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf is "tailgating" in this context? means driving unsafely directly behind someone on the road where I'm from...

    27. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by avronius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A myopic viewpoint is best hidden behind AC status.

      It is important to note that there are entire industries that utilize beverage-only refrigeration devices. These devices are running while the shop is closed and there are no customers with which to provide a cold beverage to. As an example, each and every soft-drink vending machine provides refrigeration.

      As for me, I prefer a cold beverage to a cool beverage. I haven't been subject to stomach cramps yet, but I'll keep you posted.

    28. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Altus · · Score: 1


      Realy? There realy isnt any tailgating at fenway park, though this is likely due to a lack of a large parking lot. Still, Ive never heard of big tailgate parites for baseball games.

      your point still stands of course, there are summer concerts as well.... parrot heads apparently hold huge tailgating parties before Jimmy Buffet concerts.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    29. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the Slashdot post before adding feedback? If you did you need to put down the bong.

      "I saw on Gizmodo that a company called Tempratech has created an 100% safe and environmentally friendly aluminum can"

      This was the first line.

    30. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one thinking that these ppl might actually be producing this as a re-usable thing? Why go to all that trouble of putting coolant and heatsinks on the thing, unless you're going to keep using it? Otherwise it'd be like buying water cooling and crap for your PC and throwing it away after a day or so, to buy again.

      PS, yes England does rule!! Although... why do all Americans seem to group us together with the rest of the island and call us Britain?? That'd be like [size relative] referring to the USA as "The northern hemisphere". or "That big bit of land including america, canada and south america". When playing football *soccer* we don't play as Britain, lol. I don't know. One of those things that's always puzzled me.

      Surely if you were just thinking "Let's call them by their official name" the combined name for england, wales scotland and northern ireland is the united kingdom, anyway. *baffled*

      I'm not really bothered, just confused.

    31. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by syukton · · Score: 1

      If it's bulkier and more expensive what incentive do people have for purchasing a drink stored in such a can?

      Two words: Iraq, Halliburton.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    32. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      In answer to your England/Britain question:

      Britain or the U.K. is a body under one government therefore in more formal circumstances you are "Britain" however the reality of the situation is that England is by far the most dominant element in the U.K. and in a very intuitive way the U.K. is in fact England and the lands England has assimilated over the centuries... hence you would naturally refer to yourselves and England when it comes to matters of national pride... and I think it's no understatement that soccer *football* is a great matter of national pride for your countrymen.

      When you make the simile that it would be like calling the U.S. the "northern hemisphere", I would...I would say that it would me more like calling the U.S., California. Granted that's a poor simile because we here in the U.S. don't have a particular geographic region with the same type of history that England has in relation to the U.K.

      Just my 2 cents.

    33. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      It's very common in Milwaukee with the Brewers, or at least it was over ten years ago, the last time I went (I don't care for baseball. I prefer to watch a game in which things actually occur.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    34. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Tailgating also means the practice of having a picnic at the back of your car, typically in a crowded parking lot with other people doing the same thing. It became common practice in sporting events where you have to show up very early, and then sit around and wait a long time doing nothing.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    35. Re:Maybe, but I'm thinking no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a lake or stream, just put the can in the water for 15 minutes and it'll be chilled...
      I never had a problem with room-temperature soft drinks anyway, unless it's mid-summer and you shouldn't really be out hiking.

  8. Wow, that's really cool! by number6x · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wow, that's really cool!

  9. Obligatory Yakov Joke... by Alyred · · Score: 2, Funny

    In mother Russia, Can chills YOU! Hmm...

    1. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by justkarl · · Score: 1

      I think it can be said that pretty much everything's cold in Russia, comrade. Especially soda. So everything in Russia chills you.

    2. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In mother Russia, Can chills YOU! Hmmm

    3. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Much like other expanses of land that go on for thousands of miles, there are seasons, and with that comes periods of cold and periods of warmth. Russia is not hot nor cold all the time in its entirety.

    4. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by Alyred · · Score: 1

      Really? That includes the parts that extend down near Turkey and the former Soviet republics?
      Down there in the middle east?
      Doesn't look that cold to me, but maybe that's because I came from Alaska. ;)

    5. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by Alyred · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Wow, you modded my dumb joke all the way down to flamebait. Now I'm hurt.

    6. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by RLW · · Score: 1

      Russia has seasons alright. It goes from Mack Daddy cold in windter to really cold in spring to just plane cold in summer and back to really cold in the fall. Repeat.

    7. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Just like in the movies..............

    8. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by RLW · · Score: 1

      Hey, everything important in life I have learned from TV. :-)

    9. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never taken a shot of Vodka.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    10. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by justkarl · · Score: 1

      What temperature exactly does Mack Daddy Cold begin?

    11. Re:Obligatory Yakov Joke... by RLW · · Score: 1

      That varys a lot but you can rest assured that it's very very very cold indeed. What temperature does vodka freez at ?

  10. 3 minutes.... by Linegod · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... but I want it now!

    .

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
    1. Re:3 minutes.... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      If you had started the chilling process 3 minutes, earlier we wouldn't be in this predicament now!

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  11. Article Text (Both) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Self-Chilling I.C. Can

    (filed under gadgets) Speaking of cold beverages, Tempra Technology has developed the I.C. Can, a "100% safe and environmentally friendly" aluminum can that uses a self-chilling process involving a cooling gel, desiccant, and heat sinks. They claim to be able to drop the temperature of the 10-ounces of beverage inside by 30 degrees Fahrenheit in three minutes. It's pretty cool tech, but I can't help but wonder if it's all a bit convoluted. That doesn't mean I don't want to try one; unfortunately, Tempra is still looking for a partner to actually put a branded beverage inside. (Thanks, JEB!)

    FROM THE MANUFACTURER'S WEBSITE:

    Ingenious.

    The I.C Can(TM) is the result of the solid partnership of Tempra Technology and Crown Cork & Seal, who are currently discussing commercialization and marketing of this self-chilling can to top beverage companies. Imagine: an icy cold beverage without refrigerated vending machines or bulky ice chests.

    The world's first self-chilling can is finally here! It works. It's safe. And it's development is nearing completion now through the partnership of Tempra Technology and Crown Cork & Seal.

    The advanced design utilizes the latest breakthroughs in thermal, insulating and vacuum heat pump technology. The self-contained I.C. Can(TM) is the approximate size of a 500 mL beverage can. This includes the beverage container itself, and the integral self-chilling device.

    Proprietary engineering creates a temperature drop proven to reduce the I.C. Can's(TM) contents by a minimum of 30 Fahrenheit (16.7 C) in just minutes. When activated, the all natural desiccant contained within a vacuum draws the heat from the beverage through the evaporator into an insulated heat-sink container. It is this patented vacuum-power which lowers the temperature so dramatically and quickly, leaving the beverage inside cool and refreshing.

    And it's safe! I.C. Can's(TM) innovative design is 100% safe and environ- mentally-friendly; easy to operate, store and transport. The self-contained I.C. Can(TM) uses no carbon dioxide, CFC, HFC, or any other compressed gases and is totally non-toxic, without risk of gas or vapor escape.

    As Tempra Technology and Crown Cork & Seal continue to finalize development of the self-chilling I.C. Can(TM) for mass production, we'll also innovate new cutting-edge technologies for other applications in the beverage industry.

    To learn more about the exciting - and very real - I.C. Can(TM), call 1-877-TEMPRA-1.

    1. Re:Article Text (Both) by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is NOT the world's first self-chilling can. Probably 10 years ago I read an article in Popular Mechanics (or Popular Science) about a company who was coming out with a self-chilling can. It fit into the lid of a normal soda can, displacing about an ounce of fluid. Inside the chiller was compressed carbon dioxide, which was released when the can was opened, thus using Charles' Law to reduce the temperature of the can.

    2. Re:Article Text (Both) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people in Mexico have been doing this with evaporating water and clay pottery for quite a while now too...

    3. Re:Article Text (Both) by hchaos · · Score: 0, Troll

      I get really suspicious when I read "Proprietary engineering creates a temperature drop proven to reduce the I.C. Can's(TM) contents by a minimum of 30 Fahrenheit", because this is an extremely convoluted (and grammatically incorrect) way of saying "The I.C. Can will cool your drink by at least 30 degrees F".

      The next sentence ("When activated, the all natural desiccant contained within a vacuum draws the heat from the beverage through the evaporator into an insulated heat-sink container") is meaningless technobabble. Desiccants are used to absorb moisture, not heat transfer, and the rest of the sentence makes even less sense.

      This isn't to say that the can won't work, it's just that the technical details of this press release are meaningless technical-sounding words strung together, which is the kind of thing I generally see from pseudo-science scam artists and deluded perpertual-motion peddlers.

  12. So that's why... by severoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that Coke Halliburton sent to Iraq was so expensive...

    Seriously, which would you choose, a beverage that cost $1 which you had to refrigerate, or a beverage that costs $20 which you don't?

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    1. Re:So that's why... by general_re · · Score: 1
      Seriously, which would you choose, a beverage that cost $1 which you had to refrigerate, or a beverage that costs $20 which you don't?

      Depends on how much the refrigeration costs, doesn't it?

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    2. Re:So that's why... by Aadain2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who says it's going to be $20? I'd buy it if it was $1.25 compared to teh $1. First for the coolness (no pun) factor, and second, I wouldn't have to worry about drinking it as soon as I got it. Buy it now, through it in my bag, drink it later when I'm thirty and have it self cool itself. Oh, and I don't know if any of you have had this experience, but putting an already chilled can in a bag causes massive amount of condensation to be left in the bag, getting everything wet. Being able to put in a room temperature can and not have to worry about everything getting wet is a plus in my book. But of course, this is all dependant on the cans only being slightly more expensive, not significantly.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    3. Re:So that's why... by Spock+the+Vulcan · · Score: 3, Funny
      ...drink it later when I'm thirty....

      Long time to wait, isn't it?

    4. Re:So that's why... by blackcoot · · Score: 1

      not to be a stickler, but data isn't singular --- it's the plural of datum. of course, this is probably what you were pointing out in the first place...

    5. Re:So that's why... by bookemdano63 · · Score: 1

      Depends what I am doing. If I am going hiking a $1 coke in my refrigerator at home isn't worth anything to me.

    6. Re:So that's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, if you actually hiked you probably would have a coke either ?

    7. Re:So that's why... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      That should be "Data are singular."

      Nooch.

      -Peter

    8. Re:So that's why... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I choose the false dichotomy, or strawman, or whichever error you made. Thanks for playing.

    9. Re:So that's why... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >Seriously, which would you choose, a beverage that cost $1 which you had to refrigerate, or a beverage that costs $20 which you don't?

      If I'm in the middle of nowhere and there are no fridges (no, I'm not going to take one with me) around, I'd take this thing for $20, thank you.

    10. Re:So that's why... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      If I'm going hiking, a $1 coke in my backpack is too damn heavy. I'll be carrying a couple of lightweight plastic bottles filled with home-mixed lemonade.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    11. Re:So that's why... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      If there is no reliable source of refrigeration (like, for example in a battle field or a country without a working power grid), the $20 can might actually be a better deal.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    12. Re:So that's why... by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      Depends on several factors. Do I have a working cooler? How hot am I? Who's paying?

    13. Re:So that's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually, his 30th birthday is tomorrow.

      Happy birthday Aadain2001!!!

    14. Re:So that's why... by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      ...that Coke Halliburton sent to Iraq was so expensive...

      Except it wasn't Halliburton. It was an arabic company Halliburton used as a sub-contractor.

      And as soon as it was brought to Halliburton's attention, they suspended payment to that sub-contractor.

      But why let truth get in the way of a baseless accusation?

    15. Re:So that's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if it hadn't been brought to their attention? Then the taxpayers would be out a bunch of coin.

      Just because they did the right thing after the fact, doesn't mean they were in the right to begin with.

    16. Re:So that's why... by severoon · · Score: 1

      Did you click on the link and read up on how and to what extent you're wrong? Go ahead, click it. It won't bite. I'll even repost the link here so you have no excuse not to educate yourself.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    17. Re:So that's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coke in lightweight plastic bottles weights more than home-mixed limonade in plastic bottles of same size and material?

      Wow, that's pretty nifty limonade. Can I have the recipe? And have you considered patenting it, anti-gravity drives could be a big hit in the future.

    18. Re:So that's why... by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      But what if it hadn't been brought to their attention? Then the taxpayers would be out a bunch of coin.

      Well, yes. What is your point?

      Just because they did the right thing after the fact, doesn't mean they were in the right to begin with.

      Ok, so they get accused of ripping off people.

      When it is proved they didn't and they withheld payment to the people that did, you slam them anyway.

      So if they act unscrupulously they get slammed. (which they should)

      But if they don't and try to fix the problem, they get slammed also.

      Looks to me like the people will accuse them no matter what.

    19. Re:So that's why... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      size of a 500 mL beverage can

      Keep in mind the cost of the beverage. If the device only contains 5 mL of beverage, then you have to drink 100 cans to get as much as 1 regular can.

    20. Re:So that's why... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Coke in lightweight plastic bottles weights more than home-mixed limonade in plastic bottles of same size and material?

      Dissolve less sugar than is in the Coke.
      Or else use Diet Coke.

    21. Re:So that's why... by severoon · · Score: 1

      I hope you're being funny, and I hope you clicked the link and read why that's funny. :-)

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    22. Re:So that's why... by severoon · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I shall break down the actual meaning of my post for those of you who obviously don't understand it *ahem* *cough* parent *cough*.

      I sure do hope that this here new can technology is inexpensive, because, boy jeepers, it would probably be pretty useless if it wasn't!

      To further clarify: I wasn't saying that the technology is prohibitively expensive (anyone that read the article could have seen that cost was not addressed, so there's no way I could have known that it was). I was merely pointing out, using an interesting, cutting edge, rhetorical style that the cheaper it is, the more situations will exist in which it will be a viable option.

      In conclusion: Boo-ya! In yo' face! And by the way, impressive knowledge of logic fallacy (well, it would have been if you'd been able to decide what fallacy I'd ostensibly engaged in, but still...).

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    23. Re:So that's why... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I was merely pointing out, using an interesting, cutting edge, rhetorical style

      How's that working out for you?

    24. Re:So that's why... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I was trying to be funny. Only you know if I succeeded. I did click the link, and I was playing off of what you said in your journal. I disagree with your premise, but I'm okay with that if you are ;-)

      Incidentally, "nooch" is a Kevin Smithism (really a Jay Mewesism) for "just kidding."

      -Peter

  13. Errmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well unless the aluminum is now biodegradable, how environment firendly can it be?

    1. Re:Errmmm.. by mikael · · Score: 2, Funny

      The aluminum can be recycled, but it's those little heat-sinks that are going to be the problem. Where are they going to put all the heat that has been sucked out and stored in the insulated heat-sinks?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  14. Conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those of you NOT in the US:

    30F = 16.66C

  15. Obligatory... by Asprin · · Score: 2, Funny


    With the server slowing down under the load, maybe they'll be inspired to adapt the technology to a line of temporary high-intensity CPU heatsinks.

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
    1. Re:Obligatory... by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 1

      With the server slowing down under the load, maybe they'll be inspired to adapt the technology to a line of temporary high-intensity CPU heatsinks.

      Or maybe they could just strap a few of the self-cooling cans to them instead?

      --
      Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
  16. I can ebat that... by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a can that can not only keep cold things cold, it also keeps warm things warm.

    What I haven't puzzled out yet is how on earth it knows which to do.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    1. Re:I can ebat that... by LostCluster · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For those who haven't figured out how a Thermos works... it tries as best it can to be an airtight device with walls thick enough to not let heat in orr out.

      Therefore, with just a little loss due to small leaks, it's more-or-less a closed system. Whatever temperature the liquid was when you put it in, you can expect that to be the temperature it'll be when you take it out with only a sight movement towards the temperature of the room it was stored in. The Thermos doesn't do anything... it's job is to prevent anything heat-wise from happening between what's inside and what's outside as best it can.

    2. Re:I can ebat that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can it make warm things cold?

    3. Re:I can ebat that... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      For those who haven't figured out how a Thermos works... it tries as best it can to be an airtight device with walls thick enough to not let heat in orr out.

      Actually, it doesn't matter too much how thick the Thermos walls are. A Thermos (or similar container) actually has a vacuum chamber in its walls which is coated with a fine silvered layer. The vacuum stops conductive heat transfer, the silvering prevents radiant heat transfer. The thickness of the vacuum layer isn't that important, merely the fact that it is there.

      Yeah, your Thermos contains a reasonably good vacuum! Smashing it with a sledgehammer, for instance, would be a pretty stupid plan since it would implode quite like a CRT would.

    4. Re:I can ebat that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a can that can not only keep cold things cold, it also keeps warm things warm.
      I thought the same thing too. However, then I mixed hot coffee with a cold soda in that same can, and it did not work!

    5. Re:I can ebat that... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      For those who haven't figured out how a Thermos works... it tries as best it can to be an airtight device with walls thick enough to not let heat in orr out.
      That list would include you. A thermos works because there is a vacuum between the walls of the device, not because of the absolute thickness of the walls of the device.
      Therefore, with just a little loss due to small leaks, it's more-or-less a closed system. Whatever temperature the liquid was when you put it in, you can expect that to be the temperature it'll be when you take it out with only a sight movement towards the temperature of the room it was stored in.
      It's not even remotely a closed system. Heat leaks into (or out of depending on whether the internal or external temperature is lower) the contents of the thermos via conduction in the material used to make the walls and neck of the thermos. (This is slower than via radiation which is the typical mode for something in a glass, or convection for something in a bowl.) Thus while the temperature changes slowly, it does change.

      This is why high end thermos bottles are made of stainless steel... which conducts heat very slowly. Build a thermos out of aluminum or copper, and it will reach equilibrium with the enviroment much faster. Which is why high end CPU heat sinks are made of copper, and the rest of aluminum. It's also why high end cooking vessels are made of stainless steel (for heat mass) *and* copper (to even out the hot spots from the stainless steel).

      The cheap-ass thermos bottle you (well those of us out of our youth) carried to school didn't work all the well a) because glass conducts heat pretty good and b) the vacuum in them was poor and easily broached.
    6. Re:I can ebat that... by rthille · · Score: 1

      The cheap-ass thermos bottle you (well those of us out of our youth) carried to school didn't work all the well a) because glass conducts heat pretty good and b) the vacuum in them was poor and easily broached.
      Um no. Well, at least no to part 'a'. Glass conducts heat about 12 times more slowly than stainless steel: Thermal Conduction, but you're right about the 'easily broached' part. I broke more thermoses as a kid than I can count (before they went to cheap plastic).

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  17. Please think of the poor street people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the rampant rise in frostbite cases in homeless people forced to wheel shopping carts full of these glacial monstrosities.

  18. Wow! by pottymouth · · Score: 0


    Or should I say "Coool!" (sorry)...

  19. how much of a premium though? by jtnishi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    But all this technology will come at what cost?Yeah, I'd love to have a self-cooled coke can that doesn't require an ice chest to chill on trips. But unless the premium is kept down to perhaps 5 cents a can, maybe 10 at most, there's no way I'm going to be willing to trade-off the cost.

    And hopefully, it will cool better than 30 degrees Fahrenheit under more situations. Coke is probably best about a few degrees above the freezing point of the solution, maybe around ~35 degrees Fahrenheit. If you can cool a can only 35 degrees Fahrenheit, and room temperature when you want to drink is about 80 degrees, that Coke isn't going to be cold enough for me.

    1. Re:how much of a premium though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget that sissy coke shit. Let's think about BEER - a real man's drink. Most decent beers (not bud/miller/busch/coors/etc.. light) taste best when served between 40 and 50 degrees Fahrenheit. This thing is perfect for BEER!

      No more coolers!

    2. Re:how much of a premium though? by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      But all this technology will come at what cost?

      My thoughts exactly. What if this technology were to get into the hands of terrorists? Sure, it looks like a normal can of Coke, but just one twist, and viola!, you have a warm chunk of aluminum that you could annoy someone with. It's technology like this that will lead to the inevitable destruction of humanity.

  20. Only 10 oz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how to drink less then 40 oz at a time. A paper bag is the only thermal technology I need!

  21. Oh great.. by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Heavier, bigger, cans.. More junk to be thrown away. (yes I know its alu, but not every can gets recycled).

    Whats wrong with a good old micro-fridge? Or just hang your beer up in a damp sock for a while..

    Seriously, I think its about time sales taxes were put on non-environmental packaging gimmicks like this, or maybe a refundable deposit like in South Australia..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:Oh great.. by DeDmeTe · · Score: 1, Informative

      Michigan and several other states in the U.S. do charge a 10 cent fee. I don't understand why all the staes here don't do it. You get it back when you take back the cans. You'll notice Michigan roadways clean of all aluminum cans... we take them all back! I usually wait until I've got about $40 worth sitting in the garage. It's a nice incentive.. and it works.

      --
      -Guns kill people like spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat-
    2. Re:Oh great.. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Not only are the cans heavier and bigger, but this will result in an increase in the pollution of the commons. More shipping == more lung cancer.

      And, not saying these idiot cans are at all usefull, but a Micro-fridge is a horribly inefficient load.

      It probably burns quite a bit of electricity for very little use.

  22. I'd buy it. by Gannoc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seriously, which would you choose, a beverage that cost $1 which you had to refrigerate, or a beverage that costs $20 which you don't?

    If a 6 pack of beer cost $3.00 more, but was self-cooling and meant I didn't need to worry about keeping it cold, I'd pay for the convenience.

    Nothing is worse than a warm beer when hunting or driving.

    1. Re:I'd buy it. by svferris · · Score: 5, Funny

      Forget the 6-pack of Beer, I want my self-cooling Keg!

    2. Re:I'd buy it. by Exitthree · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heating the beer in the car is nature's way of telling you not to drink and drive...

    3. Re:I'd buy it. by savagedome · · Score: 1

      Nothing is worse than a warm beer when hunting or driving

      When hunting or driving is redundant.

    4. Re:I'd buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you drink beer while driving?

    5. Re:I'd buy it. by wikdwarlock · · Score: 1

      Nothing is worse than a warm beer when hunting or driving

      I only drink and drive on the way to perform brain surgery on starving orphaned puppies.

      --

      "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
    6. Re:I'd buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing is worse than a warm beer when hunting or driving

      I only drink and drive on the way to perform brain surgery on starving orphaned puppies.


      hey, for some people that IS hunting

      here puppy puppy puppy

    7. Re:I'd buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all the cool kids are doing and if you don't then you're a loooooooooooser.

    8. Re:I'd buy it. by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      Heating the beer in the car is nature's way of telling you not to drink and drive...

      ...and devastating car accidents are nature's way of telling you to get off the damn phone.

    9. Re:I'd buy it. by xonen · · Score: 1

      Nothing is worse than a warm beer when hunting or driving.

      Here in europe it is good practice not to drink and drive at the same time. Apparently this is different in the states... Anyhow, i'm used to gas stations every 15 km, so no time for my coke to get warm :)

      --
      A glitch a day keeps the bugs away.
    10. Re:I'd buy it. by qtone42 · · Score: 1

      yeah, I hate for my beer to be warm when I get a DUI. And I'd definately need another cold beer after shooting one of my hunting buddies.

      Of course, the only hunting I do usually involves buying someone a drink....

      --QTone

    11. Re:I'd buy it. by dykofone · · Score: 1
      Here in europe it is good practice not to drink and drive at the same time.

      This is why I kind of like Europe. Because over there something like drinking and driving seen as being not "good practice," while in the states we're forced from middle school to see slide shows of car wreck victims, pass the mangled car they park on the front lawn on the way to class, and repeat chanting rituals daily about not drinking and driving. Not to mention the fact that in most states, getting caught once will result in loss of car, loss of job, loss of future job, heavy fines, and public scorn and eternal damnation.

      If somebody had told me "drinking and driving is not good practice" instead of screaming down my face since I was 10 how drinking and driving will kill me, my family, and my dog if I even think about it, I might have taken them just a little bit more seriously.

    12. Re:I'd buy it. by cakefool · · Score: 0

      Objection - shooting yourself in the face accidentally is proven to be worse than warm beer

    13. Re:I'd buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...and devastating car accidents are nature's way of telling you to get off the damn phone.

      Damn straight. There's nothing wrong with drinking and driving. DRUNK driving is the problem.

      You can have six beers at the bar get completely drunk, get in your car and drive away, no one will stop you. If you have one sip of beer while you're driving, you can be thrown in jail. Worse, if you even have an empty bottle that USED to contain alchohol, you can be thrown in jail.

      It's a perfect example of how the knee-jerk reaction has preempted thinking in this country. No one ever stops to think about the causes of problems or passes laws that might prevent accidents.

      You can swerve all over the road while talking on your cell phone in a giant SUV, and no one will stop you, but you can be busted for not wearing your seatbelt. How is not wearing your seatbelt going to cause an accident? Sure, you'll be more likely to survive an accident if you decide to wear it, but if you don't, that's your own damn fault.

      We need the cops going after the wreckless driving (sometimes linked to cell phone use) that causes accidents, instead of wasting their time on stupid things.

    14. Re:I'd buy it. by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      Well, while I would agree with you that it generally takes several beers to get *drunk*, the fact remains that even one or two beers will impair your reaction time significantly. Sure, you may not be swerving all over the road, but if something happens and you are forced to react quickly and intelligently, any amount of alcohol (or just about any other drug) will lessen that ability to some degree.

      I think the larger problem is that most people cannot be trusted to make their own decisions. The way I see people driving, they might as well be drunk since they can't seem to put safe driving ahead of whatever the hell the feel like doing at the time. It's interesting that the Autobahn has no speed limit, and yet has a lower fatality rate than the average US highway - perhaps because Germans tend to think of driving as an activity unto itself. I actually heard that vehicles made for use in Germany don't even have cup holders, much less hands-free kits.

    15. Re:I'd buy it. by jdiggans · · Score: 1

      So Mother Nature's down with drinking and driving during the winter?

    16. Re:I'd buy it. by Macdude · · Score: 1

      Nothing is worse than a warm beer when hunting or driving.

      It's called a cooler and ice... and it will lower the can's temp. a lot more than 30 degrees.

      --
      "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
    17. Re:I'd buy it. by TheWizardOfCheese · · Score: 1

      Here in europe it is good practice not to drink and drive at the same time. Apparently this is different in the states...

      That ain't the half of it, son. I doubt the OP meant drinking xor driving.

      --

      "The good reader is a rarer swan than the good writer."
    18. Re:I'd buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that's the best thing that could ever happen to a moron who combines drinking and guns. Or killing himself in a crash. Darwin awards here we come!

      Unfortunately they've got a habit of taking other people with them.

    19. Re:I'd buy it. by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Ummm... having been to Germany in the last six months I can tell you that plenty of cars (BMW, Mercedes, Audi) come with cupholders, handsfree systems, sat nav, dvd players etc. Also, the Autobahn only has no speed limit on certain sections. On most parts it's just like the rest of Europe / The World.

      I'm interested in where you go that information from.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    20. Re:I'd buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the fact that in most states, getting caught once will result in loss of car, loss of job, loss of future job, heavy fines, and public scorn and eternal damnation.

      Screaming or not, that's pretty fitting punishment. Or maybe they should throw you to jail for few months to think about it, too.

    21. Re:I'd buy it. by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      Bah! When a beverage is chilled (About 40 degrees F IIRC), most of the ability to taste it is lost. So if the beer needs to be ice cold to drink it, it means the beer didn't taste that good to begin with.
      (Bonus points for relating that observation to most American beer being served cold, and the statement "American beer is like making love in a canoe")

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
    22. Re:I'd buy it. by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Once again, Mankind has put Mother Nature in her place, saying "You ain't the boss o' me, Nature!"

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  23. Best invention? by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The british voted that the little widget inside beer cans/bottles (like in Guiness) was the best invention ever, to put fizzy back in the beer when opened.

    Wonder if this little do-hickey will unseat that device.

    On second thought, probably not... those wacky brits like warmish beer, for some odd reason.

    --
    Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    1. Re:Best invention? by Retrospecter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Overheard while in the UK:
      Why do Americans keep their beer cold?

      So they can tell it apart from piss.

    2. Re:Best invention? by johnw · · Score: 1

      Which British? Those widgets are fine for Guinness, but they really ruin ale in cans. AFAIK we were never consulted - they were just wished on us by marketing types.

      Fortunately we can vote with our feet and simply not buy cans with widgets in.

      BTW, the warm beer thing is a myth. Good beer is served at the temperature of a cool cellar. The thing is that if the beer actually tastes nice you don't have to chill it to the temperature of liquid nitrogen before you can bear to drink it.

      John

    3. Re:Best invention? by gryphokk · · Score: 1

      Why do the British drink warm beer?

      Because they have Lucas refrigerators.

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
    4. Re:Best invention? by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 0

      Thanks for debunking the warm beer myth. But I recall last time I went across the Atlantic I could barely imbibe the local beer due to it's temperature. Being from South Florida, I guess I am used to my beer being frosty cold, mainly because I want to cool down (I drink all sorts of beer, not just cheap american piss beer).

      (and please, no explanations about how drinking a hot coffee will make you feel cooler than drinking a cold beverage)

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    5. Re:Best invention? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Of course most people don't have anything even remotely resembling a cool cellar, so it's the choice between refrigerator and room temperature.

  24. Price by Launch · · Score: 1

    This product fairs well in the coolness department (huge pun intended), but how about pricing? I didn't see anything about how much this technology could possibly cost, and my bet is that it will well over quadupile the cost of current technolgies (big ass refidgerators)... So you gotta ask yourself, would I love a cold beer on my next week long trek through death vallie.... for $20? Okay I would.

    --
    Your mammas flamebait.
    1. Re:Price by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that the device would affect redemption value as well (being that it contains substantially more aluminum). Maybe it will finally be worth the cost of driving to Michigan...

  25. Score! by Piranhaa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Yours free in specially marked cases of Coke" - (Coke now maked as $50+ for a 12 pack) ... Oh, and you must love the useage of 2 different systems of measuring in the article (Mililitres AND Fahrenheit)

  26. Other applications? by yetdog · · Score: 0

    Now we just need to be able to retro-fit our slacks' zippers with these things, so when that cute girl from accounting walks by in her miniskirt, we can still get up from behind our desks ;)

  27. Hick Beer Cooler by grunt107 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Spray Freon into Beer, Beer gets colder. This is no longer feasible due to the limited availability of Freon.

    1. Re:Hick Beer Cooler by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

      True, but there is plenty of liquid nitrogen and it makes a great martini.

    2. Re:Hick Beer Cooler by RLW · · Score: 1

      what about r124 ?

    3. Re:Hick Beer Cooler by jshine · · Score: 1

      You could do the same thing with liquid CO2 -- not only would it cool the beer, but it'd give it more foam. Of course, CO2 liquifies at something like 900 psi if I recall, so it might be a bit violent...

  28. Where have I heard this before? by numbski · · Score: 5, Funny

    And it's safe! I.C. Can's(TM) innovative design is 100% safe and environ- mentally-friendly; easy to operate, store and transport. The self-contained I.C. Can(TM) uses no carbon dioxide, CFC, HFC, or any other compressed gases and is totally non-toxic, without risk of gas or vapor escape.

    So you say now. Just wait until this whole thing spins out of control and the process begins making flesh-eating zombies out of millions of innocent people who just wanted some cold Bawlz.

    "The power of the sun, in the palm of my hand."

    Need I say more? Hmmph!

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:Where have I heard this before? by cno3 · · Score: 1
      Now we just need to be able to retro-fit our slacks' zippers with these things, so when that cute girl from accounting walks by in her miniskirt, we can still get up from behind our desks ;)
      I think the above poster is one of those guys that wanted cold bawls.
    2. Re:Where have I heard this before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "who just wanted some cold Bawlz"

      um i really hope that wherever you live that is the name of a drink.

      on another slightly related note WTF KIND OF MARKET RESEARCH WOULD NAME A DRINK BAWLZ!!!

      it sells it self;
      personA: hey dude want to go get some bawls?
      personB: oh snap! but make my Bawlz chilled because thats the only way i get any pleasure.
      personA: im talking about the drink
      personB: oh. yeah me too.

      Bawlz: Straw makes it fun to suck

    3. Re:Where have I heard this before? by numbski · · Score: 1

      www.bawls.com

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  29. Weird Experience by cephyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you check out the temp chart, it takes up to 13 minutes to reach full-cold temp. That means it would get colder as I drink my soda or whatever. That would be rather odd....I'm used to drinks getting warmer!

    --
    Moo.
    1. Re:Weird Experience by eli173 · · Score: 1
      If you check out the temp chart, it takes up to 13 minutes to reach full-cold temp. That means it would get colder as I drink my soda or whatever. That would be rather odd....I'm used to drinks getting warmer!

      Heh. One 32-oz Dickey's cup, a can of Mountain Dew, a scoop of ice over the top, and a bit of water to speed things up, wait a little while for the ice to melt down some, pop the top on the can, drink some, and let the can float in the big cup and stay cold. :)
      (Better than buying them out of the vending machines around here...)
      Grammar? Come on, this is /.
    2. Re:Weird Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, they make ice now days.

    3. Re:Weird Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure? I suspect that opening the can and starting to drink its contents would arrest the refrigeration process.
      More likely, you'll just have to sit for 13+ minutes before starting to drink, if you want it to be really cold.

  30. ice rolling gizmo by Speare · · Score: 1
    A friend had a gizmo which I thought was quite slick, but I can't find any such item on the market. It was a small tray for ice cubes, and a motorized wheel. Put the can on the ice, and the motor would roll the can against the ice cubes. It was surprisingly efficient at pulling most of the heat out of tepid soda in a couple of minutes. Great for desk situations where your mini-fridge isn't restocked.

    Anyone else seen these, and maybe have a product name?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:ice rolling gizmo by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called a Tinchilla :-)

    2. Re:ice rolling gizmo by lordkuri · · Score: 1
    3. Re:ice rolling gizmo by lingorob · · Score: 1

      Saw one on a kitchen gadgets show on HGTV just the other night. For this one you added water & ice. It brought a room temp soda down to "refrigerator cold" in 1 minute, "ice cold" in 2 minutes. I'd definitely buy one.

    4. Re:ice rolling gizmo by RLW · · Score: 1

      what happens if you put damp sock encased warm beer in the freezer ? Maybe add a small fan to the mix ?

    5. Re:ice rolling gizmo by kfg · · Score: 1

      what happens if you put damp sock encased warm beer in the freezer ?

      You have to either drink it out of a glass, or a sock.

      KFG

    6. Re:ice rolling gizmo by RLW · · Score: 1

      ooooh, good point. I'll pick the glass: especially on laundry day.

  31. I read about this before by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

    In a popular science magazine in the late 80's. Someone had developed a can that cooled based on releasing highly pressurized CO2 from a cylinder in the can. It worked, but was too expensive to catch on. Wish I could find a link now.

    --
    Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
    1. Re:I read about this before by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      I remember it from that time period too. But it turned out it was a scam, it bilked a lot of investors and never went anywhere. Just like this time.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    2. Re:I read about this before by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Hey, I remember this article...1986 or 87, as I was in highschool. I never heard about it again, and the article was in the April issue of the mag, so I never knew whether it was an April Fool's joke or not.

      I guess it wasn't...but sort-of was, too.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:I read about this before by keraneuology · · Score: 1

      It was back in the early days of the shuttle program: there was a Coke version and a Pepsi version, somewhat different mechanisms IIRC correctly but the same general concept. NASA was very interested in making sure that astronauts could enjoy bubbles in 0G

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    4. Re:I read about this before by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Where did the CO2 emerge from the can? How did they prevent people freeze-burning their fingers on jets of supercold CO2 gas?

  32. Self-regulated eco-groovieness by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    "100% safe and environment friendly"

    Says the manufacturer. Riiiiiight. Plain aluminum cans aren't 100% safe and environment friendly! Imagine a few hundred million cans full of dessicant and who knows what else thrown around unrecycled...

    I'll believe it when there's actual facts posted about what's inside.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:Self-regulated eco-groovieness by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Imagine a few hundred million cans full of dessicant...

      Dessicant.... judging from the way I feel after a long night's partying, I take it you're referring to beer?

      I have no problem in recycling beer; I imbibe Coors, piss comes out ten minutes later. What's the problem here?

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:Self-regulated eco-groovieness by Srass · · Score: 1

      That sentence strikes me as ambiguous. It might read as (100% safe) and (environmentally friendly) rather than 100% (safe and environmentally friendly).... which could mean it's only 5% environmentally friendly.

      Not that I'm pessimistic or anything.

    3. Re:Self-regulated eco-groovieness by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Can you please explain how aluminum is not environmentally friendly? Yes, big piles of aluminum cans are unsightly and offensive to humans, but I highly doubt that nature gives a shit.

    4. Re:Self-regulated eco-groovieness by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      The can is fine, but the paint on the outside isn't inert.

      But I was thinking more about the process --

      Strip mine planet for aluminum (bauxite).

      Powder grind with millions of gallons of deisel to seperate (floats).

      Coal fired blast furnace to melt.

      These are all very unnatural non-eco-groovy things.

      Keep in mind, I'm not saying where I stand on the issue, I just have a problem with false advertising.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    5. Re:Self-regulated eco-groovieness by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1
      Consider the amount of CO2 emitted to mine bauxite, convert bauxite to aluminium, ship aluminium half way around the world, form Coke can, fill with fizzy water, ship filled cans half way across the country, etc, etc.

      Compare this with the CO2 emitted when you fill a class of water from the tap.

      Yes, I understand that in an ideal world most of the energy in the equation could be generated without burning fossil fuels. But until then ... see above.

    6. Re:Self-regulated eco-groovieness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no problem in recycling beer; I imbibe Coors, piss comes out ten minutes later. What's the problem here?

      Wait... I read that as "I imbibe piss, Coors comes out ten minutes later"...

    7. Re:Self-regulated eco-groovieness by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I agree that the manufacturing process leaves much to be desired, but that still doesn't mean aluminum itself is a harmful substance.

      Don't you think there is a huge distinction between the process to manufacture a substance, and the substance itself?

    8. Re:Self-regulated eco-groovieness by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1
      Don't you think there is a huge distinction between the process to manufacture a substance, and the substance itself?

      No I do not think there is any significant distinction.

      Saying that aluminium is harmless when you ignore the process that creates it is missing the point. It is the process that is harmful.

  33. Lower temp, higher price... by Ligur · · Score: 2, Funny
    "lower beverage temp by a minimum of 30 degrees Fahrenheit in only three minutes."

    Yeah, it will also undoubtedly raise the beverage price in only 0 seconds!
    --
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
  34. Product Info by mnewton32 · · Score: 5, Informative
    since their image-laden page (complete with .GIF text!) took about 40 seconds to load, I figure they'll be /. fodder in no time. So here's the text from the product page:
    Tempra Technology and Crown Cork & Seal present the first real self-cooling can.

    There's finally a real, working, practical self-cooling can. The Instant Cool Can (I.C. Can) is a 100% safe and environmentally-friendly self-chilling process that cools using brilliantly simple water evaporation. In fact, it's proven to lower beverage temperature by a minimum 30F (16.7C) in just three minutes.

    Ingenious.

    The I.C Can(TM) is the result of the solid partnership of Tempra Technology and Crown Cork & Seal, who are currently discussing commercialization and marketing of this self-chilling can to top beverage companies. Imagine: an icy cold beverage without refrigerated vending machines or bulky ice chests.

    The world's first self-chilling can is finally here! It works. It's safe. And it's development is nearing completion now through the partnership of Tempra Technology and Crown Cork & Seal.

    The advanced design utilizes the latest breakthroughs in thermal, insulating and vacuum heat pump technology. The self-contained I.C. Can(TM) is the approximate size of a 500 mL beverage can. This includes the beverage container itself, and the integral self-chilling device.

    Proprietary engineering creates a temperature drop proven to reduce the I.C. Can's(TM) contents by a minimum of 30 Fahrenheit (16.7 C) in just minutes. When activated, the all natural desiccant contained within a vacuum draws the heat from the beverage through the evaporator into an insulated heat-sink container. It is this patented vacuum-power which lowers the temperature so dramatically and quickly, leaving the beverage inside cool and refreshing.

    And it's safe! I.C. Can's(TM) innovative design is 100% safe and environ- mentally-friendly; easy to operate, store and transport. The self-contained I.C. Can(TM) uses no carbon dioxide, CFC, HFC, or any other compressed gases and is totally non-toxic, without risk of gas or vapor escape.

    As Tempra Technology and Crown Cork & Seal continue to finalize development of the self-chilling I.C. Can(TM) for mass production, we'll also innovate new cutting-edge technologies for other applications in the beverage industry.

    To learn more about the exciting - and very real - I.C. Can(TM), call 1-877-TEMPRA-1.

    1. Re:Product Info by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      It says the can & device is the size of a 500ml can - how much of that is "contents"?

      I mean, if it's colling it 16 degrees C but there's only 100ml of payload, well, that's a little less impressive?

      --
      -Styopa
  35. AH SATAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IN A CAN

  36. This will only be popular in Poland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...where they're still perfecting the recipe for ice.

  37. watch the modders by xutopia · · Score: 1

    they'll use some of these cans as coolers for their CPU.

    1. Re:watch the modders by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Laugh all you want; it was more or less the first though that crossed my mind when i readed "heatsinks" :) I build a lot of electronic devices, and heatsinking is almost always a monetary bottleneck.

  38. the low-tech original by ArmedLemming · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This reminds me of a low-tech equivalent which won a humanitarian award for making a big difference in impoverished countries' local communities.

    Good stuff.

    --
    Two fish swim into a wall, one turns to the other and says, "Dam".
  39. Or simply One-half... by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

    the volume occupied by 1 kilogram of pure water at 4 degrees centigrade and 760 mm of mercury.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  40. A week too late.... by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1
    imagine having this at QuakeCon where the Quakers can overclock their bawls beverage. Nothing like instantly chilled caffeine to get you going. Would have been an instant hit with plenty of free marketing.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  41. ObSimp by White+Roses · · Score: 3, Funny
    3 minutes to cool a can? What would Homer say?

    Moe: Oh boy, my deep fryer's here. I got it used from the Navy. You could flash-fry a buffalo in 40 seconds.
    Homer: 40 seconds? Aww, but I want it now.

    --
    Do not touch -Willie
  42. Will work in places with strange laws by slusich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This will be a great seller in places with strange beer laws. For some reason, alot of places around the country won't let you buy cold beer. This will bypass those old laws nicley.

    1. Re:Will work in places with strange laws by beegle · · Score: 1

      Greetings from Pennsylvania, where beer is only sold by the case to prevent casual drinking. You can only get smaller quantities from bars. Yes, really.

      The idea with those weird no-cold-beer laws is to prevent "impulse drinking". Since nobody likes Warm Ones (except the English), they assume that not allowing the sale of Cold Ones will force a (literal!) cooling-off period before you crack open a can.

      Most places get around this by also selling styrofoam coolers and bags of ice. That way, the beer's cold by the time you're done filling up the gas tank. :)

      --
      --
    2. Re:Will work in places with strange laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err No.
      you don't need to be a bar to sell cold beer, beer distribuors can sell cold beer (i know i've bought cold beer atleast from a brewer's outlet)
      and you just need to have a liquer license to sell alcohol. (bar, or small distro)

    3. Re:Will work in places with strange laws by beegle · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I know.

      I was talking about two different things. I probably shouldn't have mentioned the beer-by-the-case law, but I thought that it was another entertaining weird-booze-law story.

      Other places (and actually a few places in PA) have no-cold-beer laws.

      --
      --
  43. Hmmm... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    of the 500ml size... how much is left over for the actual beverage???

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Wizzy+Wig · · Score: 1
      "... of the 500ml size... how much is left over for the actual beverage???"

      If you read the RTFA, you'd know the answer... 10 ounces.

    2. Re:Hmmm... by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      If you read the RTFA, you'd know the answer... 10 ounces.

      1) This is slashdot...
      2) The site's slashdotted... and has taken itself offline... (Get a "No web site is configured at this address." error)

      Looking at the cross section on the Gizmodo page gives the impression that there's less than 300ml left for the beverage... which is barely a mouthfull where I come from.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  44. Individual Can Cooler by LetterJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been toying with building my own single can cooler that would be usable for any 12 oz beverage can. Most of those car "refrigerators" use peltier modules to cool, but spread the thermal action across 6-12 cans. I was going to order just the module kit (from a place like http://electronickits.com/kit/complete/peltier/ck5 00.htm) and have one of the metal fabricators posted here a couple of weeks ago fabricate an aluminum sleeve with a plate and connect that assembly to the peltier module instead of the larger plate that the normal coolers would. You'd end up with a monstrocity that would slide over a single can and cool it down pretty quickly.

    A revised design would turn it upside down, with the heatsink underneath and exhaust fans to dump out the heat, giving you more of a can holder instead of a can "hat", which would be more easily integrated into things like home theater seating or just an attractive housing for setting on your desk.

    1. Re:Individual Can Cooler by jmweirick · · Score: 1

      Now that is a usefull idea.

    2. Re:Individual Can Cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also what about having a sealed magnet connected
      to plastic fins staying inside the can, then you
      could use an external motor and a magnet arrangement
      to circulate the liquid using the magnetically
      coupled plastic blades. This should make
      the peltier cooling even more efficient(since it
      will maintain maximum temperature difference betwee the plates).
      The sealed magnet could actually consist of two
      different pieces, making the magnet levitate instead
      of touching the interior/bottom of the can.
      This technique should work pretty well for most
      of the aluminium cans.

    3. Re:Individual Can Cooler by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      I built a small cupholder insert with a peltier and a fan in the bottom that is powered off a cig lighter. Put it in the cupholder, plug it in, and put the soda in the cupholder on the cooler.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    4. Re:Individual Can Cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where are you going to get the fucking electricity for your idiot fucking 'single-can-integrated-into-your-fucking-sofa' cooler?

      do you think people are kidding when they tell you to conserve?

      what a fucking irresponsible idea... give me a fucking break.

    5. Re:Individual Can Cooler by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      There's no reason that this couldn't be powered by rechargeable batteries (it only would need 12V 500ma and even that for only 5-10 minutes, making it a good candidate for a battery solution). As such, the charging of the batteries could be handled any number of environmentally friendly ways, like solar panels, exercise bike, etc. You most likely wasted much more electricity just posting your response.

      Of course if we could just bottle vitriol and power it with that, you might just solve all of our energy problems in one fell swoop.

  45. Raise price, lower product by draston · · Score: 1

    The coolness factor is pretty high on this. Aside from that though, it is yet another way for a manufacturer to raise the price while lowering the amount of product that they sell you.

    1. Re:Raise price, lower product by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      But while increasing the perceived quality or usefulness of the product :P

    2. Re:Raise price, lower product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the making the product is the cheapest thing they do. Advertising and shipping cost more than adding sugar and flavor to water.

    3. Re:Raise price, lower product by draston · · Score: 1

      Right, but it is all about getting you to buy more. It doesn't really matter if the sugar and water are even considered free. If they can get you to buy two cans of pop instead of one (by reducing the quantity in the can), then they just made more money.

      I'm not saying that I wouldn't buy this product. I am just saying that consumers should be aware of when you are getting less of a product for more money. If getting cold soda in 3 minutes without a refrigerator is important, then this would be the product to buy.

  46. Trademark battle ensuing? by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pittsburgh Brewing Company manufacturers Iron City Light, known widely as IC Light. When I saw the can, that's the first thing I saw. I wonder if a fight will brew (pun intended) or if PBC will just do the typical thing and threaten a fight to get a sweet deal on the cans.

    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  47. How fast is too fast? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How fast can you safely cool a carbonated soft drink? Seriously, there is a limit, but I'm not sure what it is.

    You see, I once had a warm 12-pack of Dr. Pepper in the kitchen, and 20 liters of liquid nitrogen in the garage, and I was thirsty... anyway, I had the sense to only try one can at a time, and I opened the can first. Only took a few seconds to get it cooled down to a slushy consistency, but in the process half of the Dr. Pepper came foaming and frothing out the top of the can, ran down the sides, and froze into a solid block of carbonated foam.

    The end result was drinkable, but a bit wasteful and really messy. Perhaps next time I'll just try the dry ice, but I really don't think the heat transfer rate is going to be enough.

    1. Re:How fast is too fast? by jshine · · Score: 1

      If I recall my thermo class (which I may not), carbonated pop is "globally unstable", so if it has nucleation sites it will form bubbles and become less carbonated. When you added the nitrogen, it evaporated (due to the warm pop) forming bubbles of nitrogen gas which acted as nucleation sites for the dissolved CO2. This likely produced the foaming. If you could find a way so that the two did not mix -- say, a heat exchanger like an aluminum tube submerged in the pop that you poured the LN2 into, that might work. Just 2 cents worth from a chem-engineer.

    2. Re:How fast is too fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he just dipped the open can into the LN2, not pour the LN2 into the can...

    3. Re:How fast is too fast? by freeweed · · Score: 1

      The speed of cooling isn't the issue here - or at least, not the big issue. The same thing can happen if you put a can of carbonated drink in a deep freeze - takes forever to cool it, but once it begins to freeze, it foams all over the place, and generally bursts the can. Trust me, nothing sucks more than spending a Sunday cleaning our your deep freeze because you forgot about the extra 12-pack of beer your buddy wanted to chill "faster".

      Remember, water *expands* as it gets colder, for the most part :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  48. Salts by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Back in the early 80's, one of my roomates came from Alaska. She had a pack that was self heating via a little tab, that a friend of hers had developed. I think that is the approach that is being used for the heating. As to the cooling, I am sure that it is a simple salt based approach. Good idea.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Salts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I can warm up her alaskan geek girl friends well developed salty self-heating can by playing with a little tab?

      I'd love to probe that a little deeper.

  49. Cheap lab equipment! by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    > what incentive do people have for purchasing a drink stored in such a can?

    Man, can you imagine how easy it will be to chrystallize stuff in this thing?

  50. Say what? by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    Illegal to buy cold beer? WHERE? I want to make sure I never visit!

    (It's bad enough that here in VA you have to get your beer at the grocery store and liquor at the ABC store and never the twain shall meet...)

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    1. Re:Say what? by slusich · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dead serious. Several places in Mississippi have such laws. An area of Indiana allowed stores to sell cold beer, as long as they didn't sell gas as well. I too live in a state that doesn't allow liquor sales in grocery stores. There are alot of counties here in MS that are totally dry. Needless to say there are large sales of liquor at the places that border those counties.

    2. Re:Say what? by gryphokk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Welcome to Oklahoma, where beer over 3.2% alcohol is only sold warm, and only in liquor stores.

      3.2 or less beer is sold everywhere, and cold. Interestingly, it's legally classified as a non-intoxicating beverage.

      Sure, it takes at least 4 to get started, but it'll drunk you up eventually. Y'just get worn out with all those trips to the pisser.

      'Swhy I brew my own.

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
    3. Re:Say what? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Welcome to Oklahoma, where beer over 3.2% alcohol is only sold warm, and only in liquor stores.

      Or try Oregon, where beer and wine cannot be sold between 2:30 AM and 5:00 AM (I think those are the hours). Where a liquor store cannot sell wine or beer, only liquor. Where a supermarket cannot sell liquor. Where a liquor store can only be open 35 hours per week.

      I think each state has its own fucked up laws regarding alcohol. None of them make any sense.

    4. Re:Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Every state has its own fucked up laws. Here in NH, you can only get liquor at state liquor stores. Wine can be bought at both liquor stores and supermarkets. Beer can be found only at supermarkets and convenience stores. Also, would have loved to have your buying hours, I believe NH alcohol cannot be purchased in a store after 11:45PM and not again til 6AM, unless you're in a bar, then you can buy drinks til 1AM. Not sure the cutoff is 11:45PM anymore, I got myself a Kegerator and a well stocked liquor cabinet now. Never have the need to rush out for booze late at night anymore like in the old college days...

    5. Re:Say what? by jshine · · Score: 1

      Come to lovely Wisconsin where beer is sold cold, by the can, in gas stations.

    6. Re:Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But only until 9:00 pm in most places.

    7. Re:Say what? by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I too live in a state that doesn't allow liquor sales in grocery stores.

      I live in a COUNTRY that doesn't allow liquor sales in grocery stores. We call it Canada. Although to be fair, in Quebec this isn't the case, and also some very small rural communities get away with it too.

      The ban on not selling cold beer basically comes down to one thing: public drinking. If it's not cold, you won't drink it right away (at least, that's the theory). If you aren't drinking it right away, presumably you have to go home first, chill it, etc. Keeps people from walking around on the street getting loaded.

      Notice the ban on cold beer at places that sell gas - something tells me drinking and driving issues are the driving (ha-ha) factor here.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    8. Re:Say what? by cft_128 · · Score: 1
      I have experienced it on a snowboarding trip to Utah. 3.2% beer can be bought cold at most grocery stores but all other beer can only be bought warm from state run liquor stores. Those stores also had rather limited hours IIRC. They actually did have some good local 3.2% beers, Polygamy Porter was my favorite.

      They also had some goofy laws regulating bars. Don't recall those exactly but I seem to recall that places that served beer stronger than 3.2% or cocktails required a nominal 'membership' fee to get around goofy blue laws. Not being able to order a second beer while still finishing off my first one also kinda bugged me.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    9. Re:Say what? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      If you truely lived in Canada, you would know that liquor control is handled on a provincial level, not on a federal level. This is why beer is available in corner variety stores in Quebec, but not in, say, Ontario.

  51. How could you trust a company by OkanGuney · · Score: 0

    That can not even convert Fahrenheit to Celsius properly *snip* Proprietary engineering creates a temperature drop proven to reduce the I.C. Can's(TM) contents by a minimum of 30 Fahrenheit (16.7 C) in just *snip* 30F is -1.1 C

    1. Re:How could you trust a company by Junta · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are not saying they cool it *to* 30 degrees F, they are saying *by* 30 degrees F. Dropping the temp by about 30 degrees farenheit is dropping by about 16.7 degrees celsius.

      If it worked your way, the can would get colder measuring by farenheit, but get hotter measuring by celsius...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:How could you trust a company by GuyinVA · · Score: 1

      They are not saying that the beverage will get to 30*f, but will be reduced in temperature by 30*f

    3. Re:How could you trust a company by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 1
      In fact, it's proven to lower beverage temperature by a minimum 30 F (16.7) in just 3 minutes.

      Reread the line above... Nowhere does it say that it drops the temperature to 30 F, but that it drops the temperature by 30 F.

      There's a big difference between a relative change and an absolute change.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    4. Re:How could you trust a company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm.... read your writing.... by a minimum of 30 Farenheit, not to 30 Farenheit

    5. Re:How could you trust a company by pclminion · · Score: 1
      In other words, you believe that cooling something by 30 degrees Fahrenheit is equivalent to heating it by 1.1 degrees Celcius?

      Wow, I wish I could know what it's like living inside your head on a daily basis...

  52. environmental impact? by blackcoot · · Score: 1

    not so sure how easy these things would be to recycle or where the cost/benefit curve in terms of "it costs me x in polution, electricity, repairs, etc. to buy and keep a can cold in the fridge versus the y it costs me to buy and store a self cooling can".

    also, i'm having a flashback from calculus back in the day --- isn't the rate of temperature change proportional to the difference in temperatures between an object and it's surroundings? makes me curious as to under what sort of conditions these guys base their claims on... i suspect that it's three minutes at room temperature, but there are really four sets of heat transfers going on here: external world to the can, can to the external world, can to soda, soda to can. so modelling this turns into a scary system of differential equations.. aaaaaagh! (and they wonder why i'm a computer scientist and not an e.e.)

  53. Not entirely unique by cno3 · · Score: 1

    Kirin had a self-cooling keg a little more than a year ago:

    http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/getarticle.pl5 ?nn20030626b5.htm/

    There's more links (including diagrams of the process) if you Google.

  54. do they make 500 ml beverage cans? by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    I've seen 250 ml (~8 oz) glass bottles and aluminum cans; 330 ml (~12 oz) aluminum cans; 500 ml (~17 oz) plastic bottles; and ~575 ml (20 oz) plastic bottles. I have not, however, seen a 500 ml aluminum can, in either Europe or the United States.

    Now perhaps this company is making one, but to compare it to a 500-ml aluminum beverage can as if 500-ml aluminum beverage cans actually exist is odd.

    1. Re:do they make 500 ml beverage cans? by kimmo · · Score: 1

      Well, at least here in the nordic countries and in the mediterranean area the 500ml aluminum cans are very popular. Hard to say whether they are more popular than the 330ml ones or not. Then there are some special +20% 600ml beer cans also, though they are quite rarely seen.

    2. Re:do they make 500 ml beverage cans? by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Guinness beer comes in 14.9oz cans ( 440ml).

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    3. Re:do they make 500 ml beverage cans? by monsted · · Score: 1

      Tuborg and Carlsberg sell their (so they call it) beer in 500ml cans on the scandinavian market.

  55. In a related note.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much would you pay for a bottle of beer that stays cold for nearly an hour longer?

    Pittsburgh Brewing Co., maker of Iron City Beer, is asking an additional $1 per case. Alcoa and Pittsburgh Brewing today were announcing that about 20,000 cases of the new aluminum bottle beer are being shipped out this week to many of the 28 states where Iron City is sold http://www.postgazette.com/pg/04237/366764.stm.

  56. Fuel Cell Cars .. by dsbaha · · Score: 0

    It would be wonderful if you can use this technology with fuel cell cars ..

  57. The same by wpiman · · Score: 0
    100% safe and environmentally friendly

    The same thing was said about DDT.

  58. correction by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    I was thinking of soft drink cans. As I now recall, I have in fact seen 500 ml aluminum cans in which beer is sold (as well as pint-sized cans).

  59. Marketing by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    If it's bulkier and more expensive what incentive do people have for purchasing a drink stored in such a can?

    With the right marketing, people will buy anything.

    1. Re:Marketing by Alereon · · Score: 1

      Great job getting the word out on that auction! (I am protected)

  60. Dont need no Stink'n Cans! by rrhal · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember this?
    http://www.asciimation.co.nz/beer/

    The jet engine for keeping beer cold.

    --
    All generalizations are false, including this one. Mark Twain
  61. Recycling by Big+Bob+the+Finder · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That depends upon what is used as the "desiccant." Two possibilities come to mind:

    1) The desiccant volatilizes in the melt during recycling. A number of compounds come to mind. Ammonium nitrate (yes, THAT ammonium nitrate) is used in cold packs for athletic purposes, and decomposes at 250 C into water and N2O (nitrous oxide, or laughing gas). At about 300 C, it decomposes into other, less desirable oxides of nitrogen, and water.

    2) As the reaction itself is inspired by the introduction of water, the "desiccant" must be water soluble; you get an endothermic reaction as it dissolves. Anyway- I don't know too much about recycling these days, but I've seen cans go into chippers so they can be blown into the back of a semi truck to go to the recycling plant. One would assume that at some point, those chips get washed before they get re-melted. Otherwise, carmelized sugar and other gunk left on the inside of the cans- even in tiny amounts, multiplied by many cans- would cause more problems than it's worth.

    1. Re:Recycling by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Never mind people using ammonium nitrate for bombs, you just told them how they can use it to get high.

      Believe it or not, the gov't probably thinks that is a bigger threat.

      Who has the bigger budget, the DEA or the ATF?

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    2. Re:Recycling by k98sven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One would assume that at some point, those chips get washed before they get re-melted. Otherwise, carmelized sugar and other gunk left on the inside of the cans- even in tiny amounts, multiplied by many cans- would cause more problems than it's worth.

      Actually, drink residues is the smaller problem. -Warm water will get rid of that. The lacquer on the outside of the can is a different story. And there are processes there to remove it.

      So you're most likely right. Whatever substance they're using, the existing processes are probably more than adequate to deal with them.

    3. Re:Recycling by stanbrown · · Score: 1

      RE 2, Maybe, Maybe not. Rember that recyleing Aluminum is a VERY high temperature proceess relative to organics. They may just burn up. I doubt that a lot of effort is spent in getting the chips clean

      --
      nix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) ~
    4. Re:Recycling by julesh · · Score: 1

      Ammonium nitrate (yes, THAT ammonium nitrate)

      I'm glad you cleared that up. I thought you might be talking about the other ammonium nitrate for a minute there. ;)

  62. Doh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I meant to mod that offtopic! stupid down arrow key while select box still has focus!

  63. My beer is frozen! by tglx · · Score: 1

    After starting the patented vacuum-power can my beer froze in the can within a couple of minutes.

    12 Celsius - 16,7 Celsius = Icecubes

    I like frozen beer, but how can I fetch it out the damned can ?

  64. IDIOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're lowering it BY 30 degs fahrenheit! not TO 30 degrees F

  65. so... by 5m477m4n · · Score: 0

    Does that mean we'll have some new Miller commercials?

    d00d1: Are you gelling?
    d00d2: I'm totally gelling

    --

    ---
    Those who can, do
    Those who can't, teach
    Those who don't know how, supervise
  66. If... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moderated--must post as AC. This won't work if the temperature of the drink is higher than the ambient temperature. You have to do work on the coolant to release heat to the outside.

  67. Re:recycle = evil by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hahaha gimme a break. The Property and Environment Research Center of that great metropolis, Bozeman, Montana?

    The production of steel from recycled stock requires only 24% of the energy required to produce it from iron ore. Aluminum recycling takes only 5% of the energy required to produce aluminum from bauxite. Plastic should be recycled because, when dumped, it leaches chemicals into the environment.

    The fact that a bunch of backwoods libertarians think recycling is a loss is because classic property-rights libertarians are, for whatever reason, totally incapable of valuing externalities such as pollution and future production.

  68. If the can costs too much for consumers to absorb: by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Then this will have a CHILLING EFFECT on this product line...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  69. It's HAPPY FUN CAN! by qtone42 · · Score: 1

    They've finally found a use for the core of the happy fun ball!

    Ingredients of Happy Fun Ball include an unknown glowing substance which fell to Earth, presumably from outer space.

    -QTone

  70. Re:recycle = evil by cakefool · · Score: 0

    and yet noone mentions the source of the plastic is fossil fuels, more bad..

  71. Fredo Fredo already does this. by Libraryman · · Score: 2, Informative
    [Self-icing coffee drink!] We are familiar with self-heating coffee drinks such as Caldo Caldo from Chiari & Forti in Italy, and more recently Nestle's Nescafe branded Hote When You Want It line in the UK. Now the trend is going in the opposite direction, with a new "self-icing" coffee drink in Italy. It is called Freddo Freddo (translates as "Cold Cold") and has been introduced by Chiari & Forti alongside the Caldo Caldo product. It uses the same technology as the self-heating drink, and is ready in 40 seconds after pressing the bottom of the plastic cup and shaking.
    Text from here
  72. The concept isn't new by IvyMike · · Score: 2, Informative

    Self-cooling cans have been around (in prototype form, at least) for years now. The problem seems to have been the environmental impact. The innovation fro Tempratech seems to be more in their specific, non-damanging (in theory) technology. Article on self-cooling cans from 2001.

    I just learned that for news on cans, ain't nowhere better than CanTechOnline.

  73. Obligatory metacommenting by loqi · · Score: 0

    If I see one more post with "obligatory" in the title, I'll be obliged to punch my unsuspecting roommate.

    --
    If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
  74. What gets hot? by pclminion · · Score: 1
    In any cooling system, the heat removed from the stuff being cooled is more than compensated for by heat somewhere else. You know, laws of thermodynamics and all that.

    So the question is, when this device activates to chill the beverage, what is it that gets hot?

    1. Re:What gets hot? by James+Turpin · · Score: 1
      Well, of course, the can gets hot while the beverage gets cold. So its cool in your mouth, not in your hands.

      On a more serious note, it probably ventilates to the outside air or uses internal well-insulated heat sinks. Either way could work in theory.

      --
      Mathematics is not a crime.
    2. Re:What gets hot? by tgibbs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In any cooling system, the heat removed from the stuff being cooled is more than compensated for by heat somewhere else. You know, laws of thermodynamics and all that.

      So the question is, when this device activates to chill the beverage, what is it that gets hot?


      Energy must be conserved, but nothing necessarily has to get hot, at least in the short term. If you put you can into an ice/water bath, the can will cool down, and the temperature of the ice/water bath will not change.

      In general, you are correct; you can't cool something down without warming something up, but there are ways to buffer this chemically so that the cooling and the warming don't have to happen at the same time. In my example, the warming already happened, back when the ice was made (the coils of the refrigerator warmed up).

    3. Re:What gets hot? by hendersj · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Energy must be conserved, but nothing necessarily has to get hot, at least in the short term. If you put you can into an ice/water bath, the can will cool down, and the temperature of the ice/water bath will not change.

      That's not really true - in an icewater bath, the differentiation in temperature is dispersed throughout the bath (= a larger volume), so the overall change for the entire bath is very very small, but it does in fact still exist.

      The icewater bath just increases in a proportion to the difference in size between the size of the can and the size of the bath - if you discount the thermodynamic exchange between the bath and the air and tub that surround it.
      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
    4. Re:What gets hot? by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Energy must be conserved, but nothing necessarily has to get hot, at least in the short term. If you put you can into an ice/water bath, the can will cool down, and the temperature of the ice/water bath will not change.

      Right, but although the ice/water temperature is staying constant, the ice is melting, therefore the entropy is increasing.

      When I first read the story it didn't occur to me that they could be using a chemical process. In that case, the heat extracted from the soda is transformed into chemical potential energy. But entropy still had to increase, back in the factory where the chemical agent was first manufactured.

    5. Re:What gets hot? by tgibbs · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's not really true - in an icewater bath, the differentiation in temperature is dispersed throughout the bath (= a larger volume), so the overall change for the entire bath is very very small, but it does in fact still exist.

      Incorrect. It doesn't matter what the volume is, so long as there is both ice and water present. It's analogous to the way that you can't increase the temperature of a boiling water bath above 100 C by turning up the fire (ignoring transient local changes). All of the energy goes into the state change and the temperature remains constant.

    6. Re:What gets hot? by hendersj · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, but we're not talking about a state change here, at least not for the liquid water. The ice does go through a state change in order to transition to liquid water, but the liquid water has to get from 0 C to 100 C, and it does so, but in this case it does so very, very slowly because of the dispersal of the thermodynamic change.

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
    7. Re:What gets hot? by tgibbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but we're not talking about a state change here, at least not for the liquid water. The ice does go through a state change in order to transition to liquid water, but the liquid water has to get from 0 C to 100 C, and it does so, but in this case it does so very, very slowly because of the dispersal of the thermodynamic change.

      The state change is from solid water (ice) to liquid water. All of the energy goes into converting ice to water, so the temperature of the bath does not change.

    8. Re:What gets hot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really that dense or just trolling?

    9. Re:What gets hot? by hendersj · · Score: 1
      I think in the end, I think our difference of opinion is summed up by your statement:
      (ignoring transient local changes)

      I'm not ignoring those, because in the real world, you really can't ignore them. But I can see your point of view as a correct point of view in that the phase change from solid to liquid does require energy, that is correct. But only in the theoretical universe can you disregard the transient local changes because there is an ultimate effect on the liquid water and the air as well.

      It has been a while since I studied theororetical physics, and that was one of the things that bothered me about the subject - disregarding wind resistance (for example) when calculating the rate of decent of an object in the real world is something that was just counterintuitive to me.
      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
    10. Re:What gets hot? by narcc · · Score: 2, Informative

      In general, you are correct; you can't cool something down without warming something up, but there are ways to buffer this chemically so that the cooling and the warming don't have to happen at the same time. In my example, the warming already happened, back when the ice was made (the coils of the refrigerator warmed up).

      Not quite -- When you cool your warm can of soda (pop whatever) in the tub of ice the tub of ice does get warmer! Just not very much warmer.

      Mother nature always balances her checkbooks you know. The tub of ice took on exactly the same amount of heat that the can gave up. 'Cause it takes so much more heat to raise the tub of ice one degree than it does the can of soda you don't notice the change in the temperature of the tub of ice.

      A good book you ought to check out would be Instant Physics by Tony Rothman. It won't make a physicist out of a layman, but it's one of the best introductory texts I've found.

    11. Re:What gets hot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you some kind of retarded ape?

      First off, learn what entropy means, then realize that the temperature of the ice/water bath does increase.

      You're agreeing with the moron above who believes that he can magically make the heat from the can move backward in time (and space) into his freezers' coils just because they got warm when he made ice earlier.

      Where does the heat go? into the ice/water bath (obviously) it just takes an assload more heat to increase the waters' temperature than that of the can. (thats why the can gets noticably cold, but the water doesn't get noticably warmer, it still fscking changes temperature though.)

      ugh, did any of you retarded apes take fucking sixth grade science? Apparently not. This is fucking slashdot, I shouldn't be reading this absolute bullshit.

      This is basic fucking physics people! "duh, how does da can get cold?" followed by "I never thought of a chemical change" what the fuck?! You fucking retards.

    12. Re:What gets hot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The state change is from solid water (ice) to liquid water. All of the energy goes into converting ice to water, so the temperature of the bath does not change.

      And where then, pray tell, does the energy go? it doesn't just disappear (conservation of energy)

      Energy doesn't get "used up" and vanish into the eather.

    13. Re:What gets hot? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Sorry, you fail.

      then realize that the temperature of the ice/water bath does increase.

      Do the experiment instead of wanking on Slashdot, and see that we are correct.

      You're agreeing with the moron above who believes that he can magically make the heat from the can move backward in time (and space) into his freezers' coils just because they got warm when he made ice earlier.

      Just because your avian brain doesn't grasp the concept doesn't mean it's wrong. Apparently you haven't heard of "heat of fusion." Had you taken physics beyond the sixth grade level (which you apparently believe is as complex as it gets) you would understand what's really happening here. The heat goes to the phase change between ice and water instead of causing a temperature increase. Yes, this is not an ideal scenario, and a real ice/water bath would have localized regions of increased temperature. Your point?

      This is fucking slashdot, I shouldn't be reading this absolute bullshit.

      I've become quite used to seeing complete bullshit on Slashdot when it comes to physics. As you have spectacularly demonstrated.

    14. Re:What gets hot? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      And where then, pray tell, does the energy go? it doesn't just disappear (conservation of energy)

      You are profoundly ignorant.

      Just because the temperature does not increase does not mean the energy disappears. The specific heat of liquid water is different than that of ice, thus the energy you believe has been "lost" is still present in the form of kinetic energy as well as electrical potential between the (polar) water molecules. Ice and liquid water simply have different potential energies at the same temperature. If they did not, how can you explain the difference between the states?

      I suspect you are the same idiotic AC who lambasted me earlier. You're not as smart as you think.

    15. Re:What gets hot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's not that dense, you fucking trolling asshat - he's mostly agreeing with tgibbs but using different language. tgibbs actually said the same thing in his first post in this branch of the discussion, but included a statement about the energy being stored and released later.

    16. Re:What gets hot? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      And where then, pray tell, does the energy go? it doesn't just disappear (conservation of energy)

      Energy doesn't get "used up" and vanish into the eather.


      Of course not. But heat is not the only form of energy. I can use energy to lift a weight. If I do this carefully, the weight does not warm up. Nevertheless, the energy does not "vanish into the ether"; it is stored as gravitational potential energy, which can be extracted at a later time by letting the weight drop. Similarly, there is such a thing as chemical potential energy. It takes a certain amount of energy (79.7 cal/g) to convert ice at 0 C into water at 0 C. This is known as the heat of fusion

    17. Re:What gets hot? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Are you some kind of retarded ape?

      You are the "retarded ape".

      Where does the heat go? into the ice/water bath (obviously) it just takes an assload more heat to increase the waters' temperature than that of the can. (thats why the can gets noticably cold, but the water doesn't get noticably warmer,it still fscking changes temperature

      Wrong. The ice/water bath does NOT change temperature.

      [At normal air pressure] Liquid water does not survive below 32F and solid ice does not survive above 32F. Therefore an ice-water mixture can only remain at a stable temperature of exactly 32 degrees. The heat from the can goes into melting the ice. Everything remains at exactly 32 degrees until all of the ice has melted.

      did any of you retarded apes take fucking sixth grade science?

      Apparently you never made it PAST 6th grade science.

      Heat does not have to result in a temperature change. Heat can go into (or come out of) physical changes and chemical changes. Actually that should be obvious - a lot of heat and temperature can come out of a cold match, so why not the other way with a lot of heat and temperature going into something that ends up cold?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    18. Re:What gets hot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >All of the energy goes into converting ice to water
      And where then, pray tell, does the energy go?


      Just a guess, but I think he just told you all of the energy goes into converting ice to water. That conversion eats up a lot of energy without changing the temperature.

    19. Re:What gets hot? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Mother nature always balances her checkbooks you know.

      Right.

      The tub of ice took on exactly the same amount of heat that the can gave up.

      Right.

      he tub of ice does get warmer

      Nope.

      The tub of ice takes on the heat, but it does not get warmer. Heat does not have to produce a temperature change, it can produce a physical or chemical change instead. The heat goes into melting the ice while the temperature remains constant.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    20. Re:What gets hot? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Not quite -- When you cool your warm can of soda (pop whatever) in the tub of ice the tub of ice does get warmer! Just not very much warmer.

      Mother nature always balances her checkbooks you know. The tub of ice took on exactly the same amount of heat that the can gave up. 'Cause it takes so much more heat to raise the tub of ice one degree than it does the can of soda you don't notice the change in the temperature of the tub of ice.


      You are confusing temperature with energy. The amount of energy it takes to raise the temperature a substance one degree is not constant. In particular, in a bath of ice + water, the amount of energy required to raise the temperature even slightly is equal to the amount of energy required to melt every bit of ice--i.e. the heat of fusion. Only when you have paid the energy bill for melting all of the ice do you start to see a rise in temperature. Perhaps this graph will make it a bit clearer.

    21. Re:What gets hot? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      (ignoring transient local changes) I'm not ignoring those, because in the real world, you really can't ignore them.

      Actually, it's the other way around. That is to say that in the real world, over a broad range of heat inputs, using standard measuring implements, you cannot detect any change in the temperature of the ice/water bath. However, if you want to depart from real world measurements and get theoretical, you can make a reasonable argument that on a molecular level with a sufficiently high rate of heat input, there should be transient, small-scale temperature gradients.

  75. Conversion by 955301 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And for those of us outside the US, can is slang for a urinal. So this company produced a self cooling urinal, cause you know how slippery those things can get when you've been sitting on it for a while and start sweating.

    Although I'm not sure how the heck you sit on a urinal the size of a 500mL beverage.... oh.

    Folks, I could be wrong here.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  76. Obligatory meta comment baiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realize, some mildly sadistic person would make such a post just to get you to punch your roommate, right?

  77. one has to wonder what this does to beer by xutopia · · Score: 1

    Will it taste different because of the high speed cooling? Are bottles slowly cooled in the fridge better tasting? ;)

    1. Re:one has to wonder what this does to beer by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1
      Will it taste different because of the high speed cooling?

      But the more important question is: will it taste better than warm beer?

      Are bottles slowly cooled in the fridge better tasting?

      Bottles don't taste good either way. (Clue for the clueless: open bottle before attempting to consume beer.)

  78. You won't be the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:You won't be the first... by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      I never aim to be the first. I'll actually look more closely at his design. However, he's just cooling the bottom of the container and I think that an entire aluminum sleeve will provide much greater cooling, particularly on aluminum cans (my beverage container of choice as I drink more diet soda than alcoholic beverages). Given the design of a typical soda can, there's actually just that little, narrow ring of aluminum that would come in contact with the cooling surface. However, if the entirety of the cylinder wall is cooling and the sleeve fits well (condensation may be an issue in fitting well), you've got a LOT more surface contact through which to make your heat transfer.

  79. This is appropriate by nightsweat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you really want MORE Budweiser in the can?
    Mmmmmm... Fin Du Monde.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:This is appropriate by eidechse · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Those Quebec people make some damn fine beer. I think I've had most of their offerings (including a couple of hard to get ones) and I agree, Le Fin du Monde is one of my favorite beers.

    2. Re:This is appropriate by gomoX · · Score: 1

      That has to be one of the finest beers i've ever had. I was in Quebec for the "Dictée des amériques". I have to say it's also a really beautiful place. Lucky you.
      Back into beer, Guinness is pretty damn good too, although completely different.

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
    3. Re:This is appropriate by siliconjunkie · · Score: 1

      I hate to chime in with "me too", but it is rare that my favorite beer is mentioned on slashdot. La Fin du Monde is so amazing. I moved to Vancouver, BC, Canada from the San Francisco Bay Area, and spent a month or two missing my Lagunitas IPA (and even Sierra-Nevada for that matter).

      I have had a few of the others from Unibroue, (Maudite is another good one, but not *quite* as good as LFDM, IMHO).

    4. Re:This is appropriate by kisielk · · Score: 1

      As long as we're on the topic of Unibroue beers, I tried Trois Pistoles at a conference early this year, and it was very good.

    5. Re:This is appropriate by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

      Are you sick?

      I live in Montreal, and I stay clear away from Unibroue beer.

      Their yeast culture makes all of their beers taste the same, and that's not a good thing.

      If you're looking for a good, local beer, go to Brutopia, and order their stout (which, unfortunately, only comes in half pints, now, because of (and I'm quoting the bartender, here): "American football players who can't hold it").

      St. Ambroise Oatmeal Stout also trounces anything Unibroue makes.

      The only acceptable Unibroue product, IMHO, is the Ephemere de Pomme, and even THAT tastes like all the others.

      (great-great grandparent was looking for debate? here it is (-: )

      S

    6. Re:This is appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer a slightly less acloholic but oh so good Blanche De Chambly or Raftman. Incidentally a friend just told me that Sleemans has bought Unibroue, so we may now see a rise in availability.

      For desperate times thier 2004 Special (Only available in sampler cases) is 10.5%

    7. Re:This is appropriate by JoeBuck · · Score: 1

      Those Quebec people at Unibroue do a fine job, but what they are doing a fine job of is cloning Belgian beer.

      Unfortunately, the owners of Stella Artois are engaged in a worldwide conspiracy to ruin the reputation of Belgium. Just say no to Stella!

    8. Re:This is appropriate by eidechse · · Score: 1

      ...but what they are doing a fine job of is cloning Belgian beer...

      This is true...for some reason I thought they were quite up front about the fact that the styles are Belgian...maybe I was thinking of Ommegang.

      Then again, anyone who knows Belgian-style beer can already tell ;)

    9. Re:This is appropriate by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      Well... It's a matter of taste so as far as debate goes...

      You're wrong.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    10. Re:This is appropriate by juaja · · Score: 1

      Not to be overly pedantic, but I think it's "La fin du monde" instead of "Le fin du monde". Cheers

      --
      I HAVEN'T OWNED A TELEVISION SINCE 1967 AND ONLY WATCH MOVIES ABOUT LEFT-HANDED ALEUT LESBIAN PIPEWELDERS! FUCK HOLLYWOO
    11. Re:This is appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      La Fin Du Monde? Ouch, bad. Parent has a point.

      If you don't mind a root canal ala ton anus, then I guess it's alright. It might be cause these dudes moved here from the states that they believe just cause it has a high alcoholic content that it must rule.

      The truth is, is that it doesn't rule. It hurts. It drools. On the way out.

      So in passing, I would conclude that one must actually live in a country that can and does serve good beer, before one can judge that all their beers are good.

    12. Re:This is appropriate by eidechse · · Score: 1

      Damn it.

      Yup...it's 'La'

      I really did check first, I just checked a source that wasn't any better at French than I am...

      Thanks for the correction.

    13. Re:This is appropriate by monsted · · Score: 1

      And guinness isn't even the best of stouts.

      Orkney Brewery makes Dragonhead stout, a very fine representative of the class.

  80. Cans cool themselves already by n0dalus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am not going to pay any extra for a can when you already get a sufficient cooling from the forming of Carbon Dioxide.
    Within a couple of minutes of opening a standard can of drink, it cools several degrees, and when you pick it up to drink it, the even larger forming of CO2 that you get from pouring it into your mouth and having it react with your saliva is enough to make it cold.

  81. IHBT by sbeitzel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    fluid ounces are different from dry ounces. One is a unit of volume, another is a unit of force (force equals mass times acceleration).

    And anyway, it's a pint of milk that's a pound, but that obviously differs with the temperature and fat content of the milk (density varies with both).

    "A pint's a pound, the world around...if by this mnemonic you mean to remember that there are 16 units called 'ounces' in each, although the actual dimension being measured is different, and if by 'world' you mean 'United States of America and its territories.'" But that's a really long thing to remember.

    --
    Oh, go on, check out my job.
    1. Re:IHBT by laigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, one is a unit of volume (fluid ounce). Specifically, the volume occupied by one ounce of water at STP. That's why fluid ounces are used to measure liquid volumes in commerce, it's easy to figure shipping weight. Hence my quandary at hearing that British pints are larger than US pints. Unless gravity or chemistry are different over there, I'm not following how this works.

    2. Re:IHBT by KingKurly · · Score: 1

      How can the fluid ounce be defined as "the volume occupied by one ounce of water at STP"? Regardless, British pints are bigger because their fluid ounces are bigger. A pint is always 16oz, it's just a matter of whose ounces you use...

      --
      It was recently discovered that research causes cancer in rats.
    3. Re:IHBT by Kuad · · Score: 1

      Untrue. Their fluid ounces are smaller. But a pint is 20 fluid ounces.

  82. It's a collective noun by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    'Data' is a collective noun, not a normal plural. Which in the United States is treated as singular and in the UK as plural. You can be dogmatic about it if you like, but that's how Strunk & White plays it, and that's how it's been, by and large, for 100 years in the US.

    The class is on a field trip. (US)
    The class are on a field trip. (UK)

    The herd is stampeding. (US)
    The herd are stampeding. (UK)

    The data is inconclusive. (US)
    The data are inconclusive. (UK)

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    1. Re:It's a collective noun by severoon · · Score: 1

      It's amazing to me that neither one of you bothered to actually click the link and read the entire entry. How am I supposed to educate the teeming masses if a click is too much to expect?

      Ok, so I'll repost this link again, right here, for your easy access. Now that's like 6 times it shows up in this thread. No excuse not to read it.

      By the way, your examples of US vs. UK usage are incorrect. You must use the singular verb form in all of the cases you presented. Only when the individual entities referred to by the collective noun must maintain their individuality within the context of the sentence is the plural verb form correct usage. See the example about the jury arguing in THIS HERE LINK RIGHT HERE.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  83. Conversion from nasa.gov by btwIANAL · · Score: 1

    500 ml = 16.9070113 US fluid ounces
    and 16.9070113 = 499 ml

    --
    And then they armed me with moderator points and the world mourned.
    1. Re:Conversion from nasa.gov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      500 ml = 16.9070113 US fluid ounces
      and 16.9070113 = 499 ml


      Better not do too many conversions then, or you end up with no beer at all!

  84. Backwoods camping by freeweed · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more.

    Sometimes for fun I'll strap a week's worth of gear to my back, and hike 20 miles into the bush. Set up camp, stay a day or 2, pack up, hike another 20 miles, wash, rinse, repeat.

    Do this in the Rockies in late summer. There's usually a fire ban on, so if you want any of your food cooked or even warmed, you need to bring another several pounds of gear for a mini stove and fuel. Self-heating cans would be a godsend. And when it's 30C outside and you've been hiking all day with 40lbs strapped to your back, NOTHING would be better than a nice, cold drink. I'd pay a helluva premium for something like this, personally.

    Anything that brings a few creature comforts is nice. Anything that does this without adding another 10lbs to my pack... that's heaven.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  85. Re:recycle = evil by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem with recycled plastic is that it ends up costing more to use than regular plastic, so there's little demand, and so many municipalities require recycling, so there's an enormous supply. It's a horrible business to be in, and if even one of the wrong kinds of plastic bottle gets into your plastic resin, you can ruin an entire batch. If the price of oil skyrocketed, things would be different, but as it is some municipalities sneak their plastic recyclables into landfills, just to save money.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  86. Science vs Toys by sakshale · · Score: 1

    Looking at the article title -
    Science: Tempratech Self-Cooling Can

    Science is a hotlink that takes you to http://science.slashdot.org/

    The summary has a LEGO as its graphic. It takes you to http://science.slashdot.org/search.pl?topic=159, which is the Slashdot :: Entertainment :: Toys page.

    Is this intentional, or an editing mistake?

    Sakshale

    --
    For every problem there is a solution that is simple, obvious and wrong.
  87. Want to send a pizza, here's the Domino's to call by rynthetyn · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Dominos Pizza
    1403 57th Ave W
    Bradenton, FL 34207-3656
    Phone: 941-758-3030

    From the address, I think that Tempratech must be located in one of the dinky little industrial parks that dominate that part of town.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  88. I dont know about you guys by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    but I'd rather be able to purchase liquid nitrogen at the convenience store, than a can such as this.

  89. *double take* by null-sRc · · Score: 1

    self cooling fan...

    oh nevermind...

    --
    -judging another only defines yourself
  90. Worst Time for Warm Beer by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Nothing is worse than a warm beer when hunting or driving.

    Oh, there's worse all right -- how about a warm beer while having sex with a fat chick on a hot day?

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  91. Absolute zero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you make several layers of cans (ie, increasingly bigger ones) to get some really neat cooling for the center one?
    I assume it'd be a quickly diminishing effect

  92. More Futurama by bobobobo · · Score: 1

    Self-Microwaving Bavarian Cream dog anyone?

  93. Re:How fast is too fast? (Warning, physics ahead) by DarkMan · · Score: 5, Informative
    Warning: Bored physcist ahead. Reading the following may result in loss of eyebrow, and the opinion that a factor of ten is 'close enough'. Note that cryogenic material has risks associated with it. The level of risk with LN2 is similar, prehaps a little less, than for boiling water. Treat arrodingly.

    The end result was drinkable, but a bit wasteful and really messy. Perhaps next time I'll just try the dry ice, but I really don't think the heat transfer rate is going to be enough.

    The problem with rapid cooling of carbonated drinks is that the solubility of CO2 in water decreases at low temperatures. And at high temperatures, the rate of de-sorption increases, just for kicks. It's a wonder any stays in the water at all.

    Anyway, the ideal aim for speed cooling is to drop the temperature down to 'cold but drinkable' as rapidly as possible. Going below that temperature is as bad as not going cold enough.

    As you noted, you need to get a rate of cooling such that the rate that gas is forced out of the drink is sufficently low.

    What, then, is the rate of cooling? Well, it turns out (insert handwave here) that the rate of heat flow is determined by the difference in temperature. To a first approximation *handwave*, then, we can asses the rate of cooling by the temperature difference between drink and cooling medium.

    Liquid nitrogen (LN2) is at 77 K. Room temperature is 298 K, giving a temperature difference of 220 K [0]. For comparison, the temperature difference between ice and room temperature (the annoyingly warm temperature soft drinks tend to be at) is 25 K. Thus we can consider that the rate of cooling from liquid nitrogen is about 10 times faster than from ice [1].

    How long does it take to cool a soft drink with ice? Well, in my experience, about 20 seconds for around 330ml, with gentle agitation (i.e. a quick stir, or pouring over the ice). Thus the 'few seconds' the poster give for LN2 to hit freezing point is qualitativly correct [2].

    The temperature of dry ice is 195 K, which gives around 125 K difference [3], thus an initial cooling rate around 5 times the heat transfer rate of ice, and half that of LN2. It's not quite, because thermal contact is better with the other two cases (liquid - solid interface, versus solid - solid for the dry ice [4]).

    You could put the dry ice in the drink, or the LN2 in the drink. The problem with that is that if you drop the cold material in the drink, it might sink under the surface, flash freeze the surrounding liquid, and then turn to gas. This risks the ice exploding (and is more of an issue for dry ice than LN2).

    The simplest way to avoid these problems is use enough coolant to get your drink down to ideal temperature, so that the whole mass of liquid will not freeze, always leaving a path for gas escape.

    How much is that? Well, an estimate may be made as follows: If we assume that the coolant material are at the temperature of boiling/sublimation as appopriate, then the total energy absorbed per unit mass will be equal to the apporiate latent heat [5]. This allows a calculation of the mass required, if the total energy tobe removed from the drink is known.

    If we assume [6] that the specific heat capacity (amount of heat energy taken to change the temperature of a substance) of the drink is equal to that of water, that gives a value of 4.2 kJ K-1 kg-1. Further, we assume that it's density is also equal to that of water, so that 1ml equals 1 g.

    The appropriate specific latent heats for our coolants are: 199 kJ kg-1 for nitrogen and, surprisingly, 199 kJ kg-1 for CO2. I think that that great cosmic coincidence is proof that this sort of calculation is intended to occur.

    Thus, to remove 25 K from 330ml of water, we need to remove 20 * 330 * 4.2 J = 27.7 kJ, if we take the desirable temperature of the drink to be 5 degrees centigrade. That's about 140 grammes of coolant.

    The density of solid CO2: 1562 kg/

  94. Just feels like a waste... by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've never been very comfortable with disposable technology, reguardless of environmental ramifications or lack thereof. Hell, I'm still not comfortable with write-once media like CD-Rs, and even when I'm forced to use one I try to put as much information as possible on them to avoid wasting potential storage space.

    So I see something like this, and just... no. I don't see myself willingly using it. If the refrigeration technology is so efficient, clean and/or inexpensive, put it into a reusable cooler instead of the disposable cans. You'd get the added benefits of economy of scale (both in price and refrigeration) and it won't be such a pain in the ass to dismantle the cans to recycle them.

    Or am I the only crazy person who cares?

    1. Re:Just feels like a waste... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      No. I care too. I would not buy a product like this for those reasons (and many you didnt mention (i dont drink sugar-water-drinks, I only drink homebrew or local microbrew))

    2. Re:Just feels like a waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes.

      yes you are

    3. Re:Just feels like a waste... by l33t+gambler · · Score: 0

      I also care. I try to buy games that come in a small DVD-case instead of a big cardboard box.

      but then again, as trees can be re-sown oil won't regenerate until a few million years, and most things we own are made from oil polymers.

      Why do i feel stupid when I bring my own plastic bags to the store?

      Even my dad has spoken bad about idealistic attitude and that a "utopia" is impossible, but heck we already have it "utopical" already! Every damn little food you can buy in the store is air-tight wrapped for hygiene purposes and we live longer now than ever before.

      If we had been more positive to el and hydrogen cars, the citys wouldnt be so polluting, noisy, stressy and smelly. It may very well be quite possible with a different culture, a demand for these things, then a market and then sleazy corporations wanto exploit this market.

      It seems to be happening though, but we're awfully slow.

      --
      Teasing the nobles, and rightfully so!
  95. Really Low Temperatures? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    If you connected these in series could you eventually liquefy the surrounding air?

    The cryogenic temperature of released liquid hydrogen can liquefy ambient air, which can cause the same frostbite hazard as the liquid hydrogen. It is more likely to get in contact with condensed (liquid) air than it is with liquid hydrogen.

    Can air be liquefied?

  96. US Beer by Foresto · · Score: 1

    Maybe, but I think we also tend to have more alcohol per ml.

    1. Re:US Beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US beers DO NOT have more alcohol, certainly not the popular stuff. Less than 5%? WTF?

  97. Olde English 64's by Taboo · · Score: 1

    64 oz x 7.5% alc/vol = 4.8 oz of pure alcohol per serving (which is warm by the time you're done with it).

    The US wins.

    1. Re:Olde English 64's by GORby_ · · Score: 1

      We have some nice beers in Belgium that are a bit stronger than that (up to 12% alc/vol I believe).

      Those will make sure that not only your beer is warm, but you'll also have a nice warm feeling yourself by the time you're done with a 64oz portion :-)

    2. Re:Olde English 64's by JAgostoni · · Score: 1

      Not too mention that Belgian Ale's taste good warm as well as cold ... unlike the mainstream crap that we have over here (like Bud, Coors, etc). Go Delerium Nocturnum (I am sure I mispelled that).

  98. Not suitable for presents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " the approximate size of a 500 mL beverage can" .... Just enough for my wife to cool me down!

  99. Self cooling keg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  100. That's no shortcut! by mothz · · Score: 3, Informative
    That's actually a longcut, because the conversion from F to C is:
    C = (F - 32) * 5/9
    so you add 32 just to subtract it again:
    (30 + 32 - 32) * 5/9
    30 * 5/9
    To convert a "difference of 30 F" to C, just multiply 30 * 5/9 ~= 16.667.
  101. Re:How fast is too fast? (Warning, physics ahead) by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

    The problem with rapid cooling of carbonated drinks is that the solubility of CO2 in water decreases at low temperatures.

    You have this backwards, solubility increases with decreasing temperature. The lower the temperature the more stable the CO3 ion is and the lower the average kinetic energy of CO2 gas molecules in the liquid are therefore decreasing the likelyhood that any one molecule will have enough energy to escape the solivated state. I suspect what has happened to his Dr.Pepper is that the LN2 cooled it so fast that the outer parts touching the can froze. This freezing had the effect of increasing the solute concentration in the remaining liquid (the ice was more pure than the liquid of course just like icebergs etc.) and when the solute concentration exceeded a certain threshold the CO2 was forced out of solution. So you can cool the drink as fast as you want, so long as you don't start freezing it.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  102. Re:How fast is too fast? (Warning, physics ahead) by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, that graph may have been misleading since it gave concentration as p(negative log). Here is clearer graph http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/images2/174 solublegas.gif.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  103. I read about an even better idea in the 1970s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Way back in the 1970s or early 80s, I read about an even cooler idea than this in a fascinating book titled Future History (I think). Forget the dessicant and just put one can inside another (both very strong, and the outer one very well insulated), filling the space between with liquid nitrogen. The second you pop the top, the nitrogen returns to gaseous form, instantly sucking heat out of the contents of the inner can. Voilà, virtually instant cooling -- something like 40 degrees Fahrenheit in half a minute or so. And on top of it all, this should be reltively benign, environmentally, since Earth's atmosphere itself is largely made of nitrogen anyway (and that's where the liquid nitrogen could easily originate).

  104. Exploding Ice! by jonathanhowell · · Score: 2, Funny

    This risks the ice exploding (and is more of an issue for dry ice than LN2).

    Exploding Ice? Now That's an experiment I want to work on!
    - Jonathan

  105. Point... by DarkMan · · Score: 1

    You are, indeed, quite correct.

    The solubility doesn't go down again till the freezing point. My bad. For some reason, I was thinking of the density of water, which is just plain bizarre to get confused with.

    The 'not freezing' requirement can be relaxed a little - a small (maybe 7-10 percent) ice crystals isn't a perceptable issue (from experience, with a -12 centigrade freezer). You're not going to be able to do cryogenic cooling without some ice being produced, in any real world sense, unless you stir it lots, which de-gasses the thing anyway.

    Interesting result with freezing fizzy pop, by the way. I once left a bottle (plastic, 500ml) of soda in the freezer too long (by a couple of days), so that it was frozen solid. Opening the bottle (which is a pressure vessel), had the solid inside expand, and start to expand, until it was about 2 centimetres about the top of the bottle. I think that was the CO2 that was forced out of solution that expanded, with sufficent force to cause to ice to change shape. Very bizzare, if perfectly predicatable.

    1. Re:Point... by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, perhaps the remaining highly concentrated sludge of soda and CO2 had enough dissolved solutes to force the freezing point depression a little below the temperature of the freezer and when the it was opened the process of of further cooling (adiabatic expansion of the gas?) caused the extra viscous solution to rather suddenly freeze forming a slush with a fairly unfiorm distribution of only small ice crystals (like ice cream) suspended in it so it remained somewhat deformable. This conversation is extremely nerdy....:)

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  106. The military by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    I could see the armed forces buying some of these. When it's 130 degrees F in Iraq, this could go well. I could see someone who's about to die of heatstroke enjoy one of these kept in his gear. I'm sure they wouldn't pack a lot of these since they have to be careful of packing too much, but this could be useful in emergencies.

  107. This is not new! by jamest_adelaide · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recall seeing this idea on the "The Inventors", which screened on Australian TV in the early 1970's. Clive Hale was the host from memory. Being an Australian invention, it was pitched as a self-cooling beer can.

  108. Cool idea! by Vskye · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to try one out, but the 10oz deal kinda sucks, since 12oz cans are the norm. I also buy my beer in the 24oz, besides the 12oz.

    Another cooler that I've been using for years is made by LIFOAM of Canada Inc out of Toronto. It's called "The Fridge" drink cooler. Just toss them in you're freezer, and after they freeze they're good to go...just insert cold brew... keeps them good and cold for hours. Walmart and Kmart sell them, + a few other places I'd imagine. (just a happy consumer)

    --
    Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
  109. Ahah! More for the landfills.... by hudsong · · Score: 0

    I hate cold drinks.

  110. They do already exist, at least in a bigger forma! by sploxx · · Score: 1

    I just saw self-cooling beer barrels in our supermarket here in germany. But they were pretty expensive, about 50EUR for 30l...

  111. Re:How fast is too fast? (Warning, physics ahead) by multiplexo · · Score: 1
    Dude! If I were a woman I would want you to impregnate me after reading this post.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  112. I'm willing to bet...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is another "Pump_n_Dump" scam.

  113. Re:How fast is too fast? (Warning, physics ahead) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So you can cool the drink as fast as you want, so long as you don't start freezing it

    Not that I care to argue your logic, but I have to disagree with that statement:
    I witnessed 2 cans of (the other cola) explode (sending my friend who was washing them off diving for cover).
    The cans were warm (not hot),
    and were being washed off in cold (but not frozen(ice)) water in a sink.
    They went kablam! He dove.
    Laughing and pointing followed.

  114. Re:How fast is too fast? (Warning, physics ahead) by Alsee · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd just like to add that my own practical experience and "experiments" from my own parties. Dry ice is an excellent additive to drinks. I can pick up a pretty big block of dry ice at my local icecream-truck supply store for $10 or $20.

    There is a problem with your calculations though, the heat transfer is far lower than you think. The dry ice instantaneously vaporizes on contact with the beverage producing an insulating gas barrier. It maintains virtually zero contact between the beverage and the dry-ice. One small dry-icecube ends up chilling a drink at about the same rate as one or two large icecubes, though obviously it has the ability to eventually chill it much farther.

    Don't forget about the signifigantly lower freezing point for high proofage alcohol/water mixtures :) And interestingly when high proofage drinks start to freeze they tend to produce a rather nice super-chilled slushy state :) rather than freezing directly into a solid.

    Virtually everyone has seen the dry-ice-in-water effect on TV and movies. Any time you see a supposed science lab with with beakers and tubing and colored liquids with white "boiling" bubbles and smoke coming off the top, well that's a chunk of dry ice at the bottom making the bubbles. The white smoke is invisible CO2 loaded with condensed water vapor - basicly an artificial cloud.

    Serving "boiling" ice-cold and smoking drinks at a party is an easy way for a geek to pick up some pretty neat "mad scientist" cred. It impresses both other geeks and the 'normals' :)

    And to repeat his disclaimer, DRY ICE CAN BE DANGEROUS!

    The freeze-burn danger is comparable to the heat-burn danger of boiling water. ALWAYS WEAR HEAVY GLOVES WHEN HANDLING DRY ICE OR LN2! Always treat them with at least as much respect as you would treat boiling water or boiling oil!

    You can drink "boiling" drinks with dry ice chips at the bottom, but DO NOT LET THE DRY ICE TOUCH YOUR MOUTH OR ANY OTHER EXPOSED SKIN. Swallowing dry ice would be very very bad both because of the freeze-burn risk and the fact that it will continute to produce large volumes of CO2 gas which will build up quite a bit pressure inside your stomach.

    An extra issue is that in enclosed spaces CO2 gas or N2 gas can displace oxygen. CO2 isn't much of a threat in that way because even moderately elevated CO2 levels will trigger an intense cough reflex and you *will* involuntarily step away to clear air. However in a closed and unventliated area N2 gas could build up undetected. It is only an issue in an unusual and enclosed area, but you could unexpectedly pass out and asphyxiate. Never store or use LN2 except in a well ventilated area.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  115. A similar product in Germany. by Hershmire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought a couple of self cooling kegs in Germany. Their device? Compressed air. All you did was release the valve, and the escaping pressurised air surrounding the beer inside reduced the temperature. Really neat, even if you only got 20 L in a keg.

    I wonder if this could be applied to the cans. They'd probably be 20 lb or something. Guess I'll just have to keep buying kegs.

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  116. Not the first! by nietsch · · Score: 1

    I remember a can made for guinness(sp?) that had a little nitrogen capsule in it. That was a good coolant (expansion of gas etc) and it mimicked the process of puring guinness from a tap, which is done with part nitrogen too(something with a glass full of froth).
    If you don't like guinness, this was not for you as the nitrogen does not combine with other beers.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  117. 'Third World War' by payndz · · Score: 1

    Another thing from Pat Mills' 'Third World War' sci-fi/satire/Awful Warning comic strip from circa 1989 that's come true, then. Just hope nothing else does - there's already far too much from this ahead-of-its-time anti-corporatism story that's happened already!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  118. The secrets of peltier coolers by ttsalo · · Score: 1
    Couple of tips:
    • Make sure the thermal resistance to and from the peltier is as low as possible. Large thermal resistance means large temperature differential across the peltier and this really kills the efficiency. Big heatsinks with fans on both sides of the peltier are a must for an effective fridge, a can-cooler could be made to work with one heatsink and a sleeve for the can.
    • If possible, use an oversize peltier. The peltiers I have seen have a significant peak in the coefficient of performance (the ratio of transferred heat to input power) at around 1/4 power. My DIY fridge cools to ambient minus 16C at 12 watts and ambient minus 20C at 50 watts. The peltier is rated for 56 watts max. Running at or near maximum power is not efficient. The coefficient of performance is lowered by both the increased input power and the increased temperature differential.

    --

    --
    If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, where does the road paved with evil intentions lead to?
  119. Re:recycle = evil by julesh · · Score: 1

    Maybe recycled plastic does cost a lot to produce, but I see a lot of it in use so it doesn't seem to deter everyone. Almost all of the plastic containers used for products I buy from my local supermarket are made with 50% (or similar) recycled plastic. I think this kind of thing accounts for a substantial proportion of all plastic use.

  120. I did contract work on this... by Chembryl · · Score: 1

    ... for one of the world's largest alcholic beverage producers. I believe I can 'out nerd' you by reporting that the sludge's expansion is merely due to volumetric increase of the CO2 coming out of solution when the bottle is opened and the pressure released.

    --
    - This and all my posts are public domain. I am a Physicist. I am not your Physicist. This is not Physically advice
  121. Re:How fast is too fast? (Warning, physics ahead) by P-Nuts · · Score: 1
    And to repeat his disclaimer, DRY ICE CAN BE DANGEROUS!

    The freeze-burn danger is comparable to the heat-burn danger of boiling water. ALWAYS WEAR HEAVY GLOVES WHEN HANDLING DRY ICE OR LN2! Always treat them with at least as much respect as you would treat boiling water or boiling oil!

    While liquid nitrogen is dangerous in various ways, I'd be happy to spash a little over my hands, but I wouldn't be happy to splash boiling water or oil over my hands. The liquid nitrogen will evapourate off of my hands a lot more quickly than boiling water, so very little heat will be transferred.

  122. Re:How fast is too fast? (Warning, physics ahead) by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Yes, yes. Though the very fact that the dangers are different and that people generally have zero experience with cryogens warrants special cautions.

    Chuckle, if I posted what I've done with VERY small chips of dry ice some idiot would probably try it and earn themselves a Darwin award.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.