Slashdot Mirror


Quake and Tsunami Devastate South Asia

pfb writes "From reuters, 'The world's fifth-largest quake in a century has hit southern Asia, triggering a speeding tsunami that crashed into Sri Lanka and India, drowning hundreds, and swamping tourist islands in Thailand and the Maldives.'"

744 comments

  1. Arthur C. Clarke? by Tokerat · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Doesn't Arthur C. Clarke live in Sri Lanka? Didn't find much Googling quickly...

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by mOoZik · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, he lives in Colombo. As you can see from the picture, he is on the coast. I hope he is all right. :(

    3. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Phosphor3k · · Score: 4, Informative
      From CNN's article on the subject:
      Sri Lankan officials imposed a curfew as night fell, and tourists were being evacuated from the eastern coasts to the capital, Colombo, unaffected on the west coast.

      http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/12/26/asia .quake/index.html
    4. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      Ah, thanks. I knew I had read that but I didn't really retain it to make the connection once I learned where Clarke lived. Good stuff.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    5. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by cypherwise · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to this bbc picture Colombo, Sri Lanka also saw some destruction.
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictur es/4125643.stm

      goto picture 10.

    6. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by mangu · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I hope he is all right


      Me too, I hope he is all right, along with the several hundred millions of other people who live in that region.

    7. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to disregard the others, but since the parent was about Clarke, I don't think I was insensitive to everyone else.

    8. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by andersa · · Score: 1

      Why not call him? I hear he always answers the phone?

      Don't look at me?! I don't have his number.

    9. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/4125643.stm

      Dude, come on. That only took an extra 6 keystrokes.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    10. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by DogDude · · Score: 0

      C'mon.... Since when have the wealthy been effected by natural disasters? The poor people living in shacks are the ones you should be worried about.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    11. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by hibri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last I heard is that he lives at Barnes Place(a street) in Colombo. This is quite far from the coast, and Colombo itself hasn't been affected. So he probably should be safe.

      The eastern,southern and south western coasts of Sri Lanka bore the brunt of the tsunamis. This includes a suburb of Colombo.

      Sri Lanka is not a place where quakes and tsunamis happen. There were a few tremors, but not strong.There are no major faultlines near sri lanka.So the country is not prepared for this sort of thing.

    12. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Suchetha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      clarke is probably safe (unless he had a heart attack or something.) one of is houses is near mine, and the other is in the heart of the city. long story short .. he's gonna be ok.

      the most affected are the squatters living in improvised huts near the beach. call me cold hearted, but they went there, they grabbed the land, refused all attempts to base them elsewhere.

      atb

      Suchetha

      --

      learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
      or one out of three ain't bad
    13. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that at Hazardous.com?

    14. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by rsidd · · Score: 1
    15. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by rsidd · · Score: 0
      call me cold hearted, but they went there, they grabbed the land, refused all attempts to base them elsewhere.

      Which, of course, merits the death penalty. I suspect even Bush would call you cold-hearted.

    16. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Janitha · · Score: 1

      Yeah he does, I have personally met him. I am orginally from Sri Lanka, hope my family and everyone is alright, seems like most of the telephone systems are down.

      For all of the time I have lived there, there wernt any kind of earthquakes or such, not even news of any that were in the history either.

    17. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Which, of course, merits the death penalty.
      Strawman. Who said it does? However it certainly justifies a "told you so", IMHO.
    18. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by John+Courtland · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not like the punishment was meted out by man. They chose to live there, they die. Welcome to real life.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    19. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by AnuradhaRatnaweera · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dr Clarke used to live in Barne's Place (quite far from the coast), and I don't think he has shifted. I traveled by a road closeby this evening, and there was zero damage to that neighbourbood.
      However, as far as health is concerned, Dr Clarke is not fareing very well. I saw him on a wheelchair at a recent convention where he was a (the?) guest of honour.

    20. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by igny · · Score: 1

      Last I heard is that he lives at Barnes Place(a street) in Colombo. This is quite far from the coast, and Colombo itself hasn't been affected. So he probably should be safe.
      Why can't you, slashdotters, imagine Clarke going to beach in a sunny day?

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    21. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by skahshah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did they really have the choice?

    22. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Well, according to Suchetha, in post 11185178 - it seems like some agency or group was attempting to move them. I quote: "... refused all attempts to base them elsewhere." Maybe I misinterpreted, but I don't believe I did.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    23. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Khum Bhumi Jensen, the son of Prince Ubolrattana and the grandson of His Majesty the King, is among many people still unaccounted for, according to a radio message broadcast from Phuket.

      Source: The Nation

    24. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just cite a Slashdot post as a source of accurate information? I saw a Slashdot post that said that Arthur C. Clarke could rape little boys with his mind.

    25. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are cold-hearted and I suspect your claim of "refused all efforts" is bullshit -- what exactly were the efforts to "base them elsewhere" and did those elsewheres include plausible opportunities for employment?

    26. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Watcher · · Score: 1

      Clarke has been wheelchair bound for some time. Between post-polio syndrome and another disease whose name I'm not even going to bother to pronounce (info here. He is getting up there in years, though.

    27. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      Hell, I hope everyone else there (i.e., the poor people) were also evacuated!

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    28. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I saw a Slashdot post that said that Arthur C. Clarke could rape little boys with his mind.

      Dude, you just MADE UP a Slashdot post! That's gotta be a record for uncredibility or something!

    29. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by bulliver · · Score: 1

      Tell that to all the millionaires who's homes burnt during the California wildfires a few years back.

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
    30. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh...a lot of these squatters may have had no other place to live. It's never that simple.

    31. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably had some sort of federally subsidized insurance plan of some sort and ended up making money on the deal. Just like the rich folks whose houses are swallowed up by the sea.

    32. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "One death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic."

    33. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by jasonmicron · · Score: 1

      Thank you Joseph Stalin.

    34. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Since when have the wealthy been effected by natural disasters?"

      Dozens of wealthy people died when the Titanic sank. Since the wreck was caused by an iceburg, it was a "natural disater" of sorts.

    35. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who's homes burnt

      "whose".

    36. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

      I have sent an E-mail to Arthur C. Clark , included a URL to this thread. He's usualy quick at replying.(assuming the phone lines are working) His home is about 1/2 Mile inland, but there are several of these British style clubs he likes to visit that have walls on three side and ocean on the fourth. I'd really not want to be at one when the tsunami hit.

      From the news it looks like waves were large enough to capsize boats in Columbo and the Galle Face Green (my favorate spot) people were washed across a field into a fence that ran along the road side, but they didnt' think anyone was washed out...

      http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/12/26/ em ail.replies/

      --
      I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    37. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They chose to live there, they die.

      Yes, the important thing to do when a disaster and huge loss of human life occurs is to start meting out blame, especially to the victims.

      You are a prize asshole.

    38. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by apanap · · Score: 1

      Yeah, along with a few thousand european and american tourists. There are over 600 SWEDES missing, and there are only 9 million of us, so I can only imagine how many other europeans must be...

      --
      Give me a job. Please?
    39. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by longbot · · Score: 0

      If you hope he's all right, you obviously didn't read 3001...

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    40. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      effected by natural disasters

      "affected".

    41. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the important thing, is that you made your point on the internet.

    42. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by John+Courtland · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Never said I wasn't. But overanalyzing my statement makes you a prize retard. I never blamed anyone for anything. This is a disaster, it happened, people lived where it happened, they died, it happens.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    43. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a disaster, it happened, people lived where it happened, they died, it happens.

      So in essence, you made a non-statement. If you have nothing to communicate, how about shutting up instead?

    44. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he lives in Colombo. As you can see from the picture, he is on the coast.

      Please look at a map of South Asia. Sumatra is east of Sri Lanka. Colombo is on Sri Lanka's west coast. It's very unlikely that Colombo could be damaged by a tsunami originating from the east.

    45. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      At least 14!

      shift, <, A, [space], H, R, E, F, =, ... >

      Then the closing tag: <, /, A, >

      16 characters, if you use quotes around the URL.

      6 characters is one thing, but those extra 8 really take away any incentive to look like I care about my post. I mean, c'mon, that's like 4 seconds taken out of my life that could have been spent cleaning wax out of my ear!

    46. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1
      URLs <URL:http://example.com/> will auto-link a URL

      Okay, 8 if you count SHIFT+, and SHIFT+. as two strokes.

      Nyah nyah.

      I mean, c'mon, that's like 4 seconds taken out of my life that could have been spent cleaning wax out of my ear!

      Heh. You'd think with that stupid 20 second post rule people would be happy to have things eat up time while they're trying to build their repsonses (spell checking comes to mind... yes, I'm aware I didn't fix it).

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    47. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

      Or the ones whose homes slid down the mud cliffs they were built on the edge of. I think California millionaires are largely exempt from the common sense you might expect from older money.

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    48. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > URLs http://example.com/ will auto-link a URL

      Is that a Slashdot feature or something? I've never seen that before.

    49. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Yea, it's on the reply screen right under the list of allowed HTML tags. IIRC, it was added with the update that broke Slashdot so badly this past summer.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    50. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Wow, I must be selectively blind, I hadn't noticed that before.

    51. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      Cold hearted ?

      No, you're an unfeeling, selfish, arrogant, name-dropping, cold hearted cunt. That's what you are?

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    52. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Propheticaly, Clarke recently started a project that was sceduled in 2005 to make reccomendations about an early tsunami warning system.

      http://www.clarkefoundation.org/projects

    53. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by drinker · · Score: 1

      do you know who said that? Stalin, if it means something to you. so i think this quote is completely out :( BTW, Im very interested in Clarke, so I hope hes all right...

    54. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Wheelchairs don't roll in sand.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    55. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by John+Courtland · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wow, can you not travel past my original post to the parent and grandparent? The one who said "...so the deserve the death penalty..." I merely stated that these people died as an act of nature, not some "death penalty".

      So in essence, you're a fucking moron. $10 says you wouldn't have the balls to act like such a bitch to my face, so what's the point of acting like one over the internet?

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    56. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by jamielnmj · · Score: 1

      I am curious if you still hold the same beliefs that you presented in your posts of two or three days ago? You stated that those who died of the tsunami were deserving of their fate/ karma due to their reckless disregard of their government's warnings and their ignorance of your supposed correct actions on their part. There have been thirty-seven (37) nationalities that have been, (at a minimum), identified as having being killed, missing, or DEAD! By their nations and families statements they were not there to squat! Where is it that you stand based on your argument of "victims chose to be there?" Oh, as of my clock, the death toll is 100,000 and still climbing and the date is 12.29.04.

    57. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Suchetha · · Score: 1

      and the flames grew higher and higher.

      so lets address them one by one shall we?

      1. i would say that i am cold hearted. but i believe that people who deliberately put themselves in harms way shouldn't be spared the pity.

      2. the government has been trying to get rid of the squatters who live along the coastline for almost three decades. these attempts have been unsuccessful for many reasons. primarily the squats are a haven for the goons and thugs the parliamentarians use. the squatters have resisted every attempt to move them. the government has provided them with land in the central areas, many of them sold teh land and came back. the government then provided them with an apartment complex in the city. they sold THOSE and came back. there was a time when the squatters have taken over a road reservation. the government gave them land AND money. for every squatter that left, two took their place. hey .. free money.. encroachers have also taken over private and government lands by force (a'la mugabe's kenya). they have also taken over forest preserves, destroying what little forest cover we have. they are egged on by various "human rights" NGO's who claim that they have a right to live where they please.

      3. these squats have become a haven for crime. muggers, thieves, thugs for hire etc etc. there was a time when you couldn't walk along the beach without a significant probablity of getting mugged and/or raped

      4. the coastline has been attacked by storms, and all kinds of other natural disasters. yet these people come back, take wahtever aid they get and move in. if you travel down the coast, except where someone has built a house or a hotel (and sometimes even there) its almost one continuous shanty town. houses made of plywood and tree branches.

      5. people in the area have been building houses with low quality materials. if you look at the houses you'll see quite a few standing while the next one to them is powder. this is not a tornado that hits on a point level. this was a frikken WAVE. some houses stand because they were built well. not with flimsy materials that coould be knocked down with a good kick

      6. a lot of deaths happened with rubberneckers. people were jamming the streets after the first wave to see what this tsunami was about. if you look at teh TV coverage, you'll see that. and they got caught to teh second, much larger, wave. darwinism is a bitch

      do i feel sorry for the people who died through no fault of their own? yes and no. i didn't know them, and a natural disaster is.. natural.. you can't predict when it will hit or how. if you gotta die, you gotta die.

      i gave my share of aid, its the human thing to do. but i really don't feel anything

      atb

      Suchetha

      --

      learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
      or one out of three ain't bad
    58. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Suchetha · · Score: 1

      sorry for not replying sooner. but my work ISP has started running an open proxy and i can only post from home (16.8kbps ... strewth) i wrote a post, but when i found i couldn't post it i put it in my journal. i just placed it as a reply to the parent. so do i still feel that all those people deserved to die? no i don't. i never felt like that. i DID feel (and still DO feel) that people who put themselves in harms way deserve little sympathy. sri lanka's death toll is so high because the entire coastline is one long shantytown. but its too big to feel anything. i am glad that two of my friends survived unscathed (mostly) and sad that another (who was on a surfing holiday) caught the wave and didn't make it back. all i can hope is that it was quick. on the other side, i'm a fatalist. if you gotta go you gotta go. and there is no $deity who can save you. not all of them were squatters, not all of them were victims of anything other than being at the wrong place at the wrong time. but what can you do. atb Suchetha

      --

      learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
      or one out of three ain't bad
    59. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      Death by Karma because a later story answered my question?

      Just when you thought the internet couldn't suck much worse...

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    60. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lying bitch. dont denigrate poor ppl living on those beaches. Not all of them were the criminals you allude to. 1/3 of the ones who died were kids. They were certainly innocent! Their curses will damn you forever.

    61. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still fail to address the main point in the accusations levelled against you: nobody expected a freaking tsunami! "Put themselves in harms way" can only be said if anyone think there's any likelihood of harm. As of now, most people evidently didn't, squatters and tourists and other people alike. Or else we wouldn't have 150,000+ dead.

      That they were muggers etc. is completely besides the point. If you're not saying that being a mugger, or living close to one, merits the death penalty.

      Yes, you're cold hearted. You're also an idiot. The flames are quite well deserved. Welcome to my, and I suspect lots of other Slashdotters, list of foes.

    62. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when they "chose" to live there, they didn't expect tsunamis, did they? You could just as well say of the thousands of dead tourists, "well, they chose to go there, so they had it coming". It doesn't make any sense.

      And as for "welcome to real life", if you think you're cleverer than the rest of us because you have figured out that good people might die, think again. We know that too. That doesn't mean we have to be jerks about it. Try to get into your thick little skull that it's entirely possible to think this is a terribly tragic thing that none on those beaches deserved, while at the same time realizing that this is "real life".

      People like you get me worked up no end. You say welcome to the real world. I say, welcome to my list of foes, John Courtland.

  2. Hope they're all right.. by priestx · · Score: 1

    Wow this is pretty major. Unpredictable or overlooked? At any rate I ghope they're ok.

    --
    "To be is to do." -Socrates
    "To do is to be." -Jean-Paul Sartre
    "Do-be-do-be-do." -Frank Sinatra
  3. Geez.... by bugbeak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...set off by the 8.9 magnitude earthquake...

    Windows in JAKARTA, Indonesia, were rattling, and some even broke. And that is a 2-3 hour flight away from the epicenter!

    1. Re:Geez.... by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Didn't feel anything in Malaysia - Kota kinibalu, but that's just me.

    2. Re:Geez.... by acz · · Score: 1

      I actually live in Jakarta and didn't notice anything.

    3. Re:Geez.... by blackpaw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wanker

    4. Re:Geez.... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Based in Singapore, and am just off calling folks back home in India (and elsewhere).

      Felt nothing here *in* Singapore myself, but guys, I can't tell you how awed by the sheer REGION this covered; there was a 2m wave in, hold your breath, Seychelles which is about twice as far from Indonesia as the Indian sub-continent is.

    5. Re:Geez.... by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Jakarta runs on Windows or Linux.

      --
      Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    6. Re:Geez.... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      It depends on what kind of house you are in, and what floor you're on. The higher you are in a house, the more the swaying of the house can be felt. Once I was sitting in a chair in my room (3rd floor in a concrete house), and felt my head getting bumped against the fridge, loose things mocing a bit, and some sounds. Guys from the 1st floor later asked, "Quake.. what quake?". Also, I think local topography can affect to some degree.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    7. Re:Geez.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but Kota Kinabalu is on Borneo, not on Mainland Malaysia. Further away from the quake than Jakarta.

      My sister has a friend who's entire family was spending christmas on Koh Phi Phi in Thailand which was one of the worst hit tourist destinations... I REALLY hope they are alright, she hasen't heard anything from them yet...

    8. Re:Geez.... by zenneth · · Score: 0

      Windows in JAKARTA, Indonesia, were rattling, and some even broke. And that is a 2-3 hour flight away from the epicenter!

      I live in the US and my Windows seemed to be broken... then I realised I just needed to reboot.

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    9. Re:Geez.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "That's why, as anyone who's worked with them can tell you, they're on the fucking phone all day - asking the person who does have a clue."

      What's to stopping you and your friends (if you have any) doing the same?

    10. Re:Geez.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already done, already modded troll. You fail it!

    11. Re:Geez.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we're honest, hard working Americans, not a bunch of shitty nigger bimbos looking to funnel some money into their mud country, that's it.

    12. Re:Geez.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of the biggest natural disasters of the last half century and you want to do a lame microsoft joke. i hope you're pleased with yourself.

    13. Re:Geez.... by bulliver · · Score: 1

      Very poor taste buddy...

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
    14. Re:Geez.... by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I am in northern Thailand (about 1000 miles north) and it woke me up. The chains of the fan rattling against the light. I called some friends that live near to the coast and they had been to hung over from the night before to notice anything. One friend had not even heard about it until I told her and she lives very near the coast but a few floors up.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  4. Difficult to detect / prevent by mOoZik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tsunamis are notoriously difficult to detect, as they remain underwater until approaching the shore; also, the wavelength is in the order of kilometers, so it's very hard to track. However, I'm surprised earthquake detectors could were not used to evacuate people along the coast. A devastating loss of life is the result of such incompetence/inability.

    1. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A BBC World report said that this sort of warning might be available in the Pacific where such things are more common but is not (yet?) set up for the Indian Ocean.

    2. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by danamania · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They also have the ability to travel terrifically long distances. Sumatra to India isn't a small stretch, even if they're relative neighbours.

      What I'd like to know is - did the wave reach the east coast of Africa? Madagascar? did the Seychelles feel any of the effect? It was only this year a BBC documentary about tsunamis indicated they could easily travel across the largest oceans, but there hasn't been any news of African flooding.

    3. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by enosys · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, they're difficult to detect over deep water. However, the earthquake was obvious enough and one should assume that there may be a tsunami after a quake like that. There should have been some kind of warning.

      Maybe some of the countries didn't have any sort of tsunami warning system. The west coast of USA and Canada has the NOAA West Coast & Alaska Tsunami Warning Center.

    4. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by d_strand · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're beeing a bit harsh. These waves travel hundreds of kph/mph so any warning will only give you a few minutes, at most maybe an hour. All countries in the region are poor and not very well developed so they cant afford the types of systems you're talking about. Mostly they rely on western countries for warnings and the timings are very tight.

      A warning system should really be installed along the american southeast coast. The mountains/ocean shelves on several islands of the european/north african coast are extremely close to colapsing into the atlantic which would send enormous tsunamis towards USA. USA, as opposed to the countries struck today, can afford the systems...

      going back to hoping my neighbours made it... they're on vacation in Phuket

    5. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Teun · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Tsunamis travel at about 950 km/h, that's about the speed of a high altitude jetliner!

      As these events are rare around this part of the world there has so far not been a need to set up a warning system.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    6. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no detectors for Tsunamis in the Indian Ocean. Unlike in the Pacific (where detectors exist), a tsunami in this area are quite rare.

    7. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by FRiC · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but Phuket got hit pretty bad. Right now (11 PM local time) the TV is showing the damage from Phuket, and people are calling in to the TV station reporting names of the deceased.

    8. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      I don't think I am. We're talking about thousands of dead people because there was no system in place to potentially avert or lessen the impact of such a disaster. Instead of making excuses like you and others seem to be, you should instead be concentrating on what COULD HAVE been done and what SHOULD be done in the future. Even if one life is saved as a result of such a system, then it is successful. I understand that funding and related politics may hinder such a warning system, but feel it is in the interest of those countries - as well as humanity in general - to take every step to lessen the impact of such disasters.

    9. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by d_strand · · Score: 1

      I know. Been watching cnn and bbc all morning. Times like this i wish i was religious.. :-(

    10. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by d_strand · · Score: 1

      I agree. I just meant that the nasty political/economic reality means there wont be any systems like this in poor areas of the world. If not even the US will build one (pocket change for the US government) because it "allmost never happens", not many other will spend the money either. A few 1000 deaths every few years or so means nothing on a global scale. I dont agree with this, I think a single life saved is worth millions and millions of dollars, but I'm not the one in charge.

    11. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      And those millions would be diverted from something, like setting up schools in those areas or helping to stop famines.

    12. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by hughk · · Score: 1
      I understand that the main threat is in the Canary Islands, although the article linked says that perhaps the threat is overstated. OTOH, there are boulders that seem to have been displaced in the bahamas that tie to a previous subterranean landslide in the Canaries.

      Between this and a possible impact that may cause major damage, it seems that there is a lot more to worry about than a war on terrorism.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    13. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by StarfishOne · · Score: 1
      Tsunamis are notoriously difficult to detect, as they remain underwater until approaching the shore; also, the wavelength is in the order of kilometers, so it's very hard to track.

      First of all I'm certainly not an expert in this area, hence the following question:

      If such a wave, despite the fact that the wavelength is in the order of kilometers, is traveling at such a high speed: wouldn't it be possible to detect some kind of Doppler-effect for a particular region of the ocean?!? (using SONAR-like/related technologies)

    14. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      I thought that too, but also, how would the info be effectively distributed to a large area like that and how much time would people have to move out on foot?

      No, I'm really curious. I have a vague idea of the area involved and assume that it is very poor and there is not much in the way of communication and transportation infrastructure.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    15. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very hard to distinguish a Tsunami, with a crest-to-trough amplitude of less than a metre spread across a wavelength of kilometres, from an ordinary wave or tide.

      However, that's immaterial - once a earthquake of sufficient magnitude occurs at a shallow depth below the Ocean floor, a Tsunami can be presumed to follow (it may not turn out to be a significantly dangerous one, but better safe than sorry).

    16. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Rudolfo · · Score: 1

      Hawaii has an air raid like tsumani warning system along its shores. There are tsunami detecting buoys anchored way offshore in deep water and the motion of the buoys will indicate an arriving tsunami.

      Here's a link at the National Oceanographic and Atmostpheric Administration:
      http://www.publicaffairs.noaa.gov/grounders/tsunam is.html

    17. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by scheme · · Score: 1
      I understand that funding and related politics may hinder such a warning system, but feel it is in the interest of those countries - as well as humanity in general - to take every step to lessen the impact of such disasters.

      Those funds don't appear out of nowhere. The governments involved probably had a choice of setting up a system to warn of tsunamis or of running schools, encouraging local businesses, aids prevention campaigns, etc. Given the choice between the two and the rarity of tsunamis in SE asia where would you spend the scarce funds that are available?

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    18. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by danamania · · Score: 1

      Amazing what a little time brings up.

      African & Seychelles tides and a little more info here.

    19. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that schools are on the opposite side of the coin. I'm talking about government waste of money, which is true in all countries. Seeing how a few thousand people have died, I don't think they should worry about attending school anymore.

    20. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money is money, and when you a country as large and poor as say india, it's all about life and death. Which 100 people should starve, or die in some other grizzly manner to save each person killed by the tsunami?

    21. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by caino59 · · Score: 1

      wish? but you aren't...

      doesn't that make you think?

      seriously.

    22. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes I wish I coudl be stupid or ignorant, life would be easier that way too. Other times wish I could hide behind a religious belief. It's the thinking that make me face reality. Seriously.

    23. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you have those first two covered. All a matter of opinion.

    24. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Incompetency? How the hell are you going to evacuate these low-lying places in time? Do you think they have enough plans sitting fueled and ready to go on the runway in the Maldives? Do you think thousands of people on the coast of Bangladesh can move in land quickly enough?

      I think you need to educate yourself some more before passing such harsh judgement.

    25. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have thought a few of those radar beaming earth observation satellites would have detected the wave moving.. Or maybe the spy satellites (well, they can track a submarine by its wake can't they?)

    26. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Door-opening+Fascist · · Score: 1

      BBC News shows Somalia listed on their map.

    27. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 1
      Thousands could have been saved in Sri Lanka:
      The earthquake of magnitude 8.9 as measured by the U.S. Geological Survey struck at 7:59 a.m. (00.59 a.m. British time) off Sumatra and swung north with tremors into the Andaman islands. A warning centre such as those used along the Pacific Rim could have saved most of the thousands of people who died, A USGS official said. "And I think this will be a lesson to them," he said, referring to the devastated countries.
      Article here: http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=to pNews&storyID=644515


      Harsh? Yes. But realistic. A number of someones in a number of countries saved a few bucks by not having a warning system. Perhaps there were some areas where it would have done more harm than good... but I doubt it. A sad day for hundreds of thousands of people. Let us consider what we can do to help them, and to help mitigate future disasters such as this one.

      Just a thought.
    28. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SONAR isn't going to work. In deep water, a tsunami travels at something approaching the speed of sound. You might as well put a big sign on the beach: "If this sign is underwater, you may be experiencing a tsunami."

      But the receding water line should have been a big blinking warning for everyone.

    29. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      That's certainly true re. the speed. But if one has a handful of observation buoys, I figure they should be able to detect something and signal it via sattelite at the speed of light.

    30. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by d_strand · · Score: 1
      wish? but you aren't... doesn't that make you think?
      Not really. I have thought alot about religion and philosphy, even studied it somewhat at university before selecting CS as my major. I came to the conclusion that it is only wishful thinking. We all want the comfort of believing in a good higher power that will take care of us in the end no matter what happens. But no matter how much i want this to be true, there just isn't anything that points to this being the case. Sadly.
    31. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by net_bh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This Indian Express article supports parent about the rarity of tsunamis in the Indian subcontinent.

      --
      There is no patch for stupidity

      Visit my blog

    32. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by norite · · Score: 1
      Yes, the tsunami has hit East Africa. Copy & paste the link below for more info:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/412 6513.stm

      --
      -- Fuck Beta
    33. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by CPrimerPlus · · Score: 1
      I thought that too, but also, how would the info be effectively distributed to a large area like that and how much time would people have to move out on foot?
      This shouldn't even be an issue. The U.S., candada and others should have an international team in place, even if it's only a few ppl to warn the west if and when anything does happen. I find it ridiculous how these so called experts want to dismiss everything they cannot expalain right away. Scientist disgust me sometimes, if it can't be proven, its basically not possible. Science isn't a sure thing, its a best guest scenario and you should prepare for the worst case scenario ALWAYS. I utterly aggree the leader of the group who made the origianl prediction regarding the canary islands.
      So Bill McGuire is sticking to the predictions his team have made. Making no apology for backing a worst-case model, he says: "There's no question of hiding things. If you're planning for any future disaster you're not going to consider the least disastrous scenario, you're going to consider the most."
      Ppl tend to forget there have been natural disasters in the past and there will continue to be many more, possible wiping out a lot of humanity and forcing us to start over again, much like the great flood sevreal thousands of years ago, and who knows what came before that. How idiotic! reminds of how even einstein refused to even look at the proof of quatum mechanics stong and week force - pretty much ignored it - instead focusing on his general theory of relativity. Now string theory comes along....
      Back in 1999, scientists at University College London published a paper about a volcano on the island of La Palma. They predicted that, if it erupted, the volcano could cause a landslide in which a massive chunk of land fell into the ocean. They then proposed that a landslide this big would generate a mighty tsunami big enough to cross the Atlantic, devastating the Caribbean and the eastern seaboard of the US.
      this a pretty significant peace of land. If i was in a position of authourity I'd suggest quick and careful attention be paid to it!!!
    34. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by n3m0s · · Score: 3, Informative

      From Reuters ...
      NO WARNING SYSTEM

      In Los Angeles, the head of the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center said U.S. officials who detected the undersea quake tried frantically to get a warning out about the tsunami.

      But there was no official alert system in the region, said Charles McCreery, director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's center in Honolulu.

      "It took an hour and a half for the wave to get from the earthquake to Sri Lanka and an hour for it to get ... to the west coast of Thailand and Malaysia," he said. "You can walk inland for 15 minutes to get to a safe area."

      "We tried to do what we could," he said. "We don't have contacts in our address book for anybody in that part of the world." ....
      http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?typ e=topN ews&storyID=7180384&pageNumber=1

    35. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by scheme · · Score: 1
      I don't believe that schools are on the opposite side of the coin. I'm talking about government waste of money, which is true in all countries. Seeing how a few thousand people have died, I don't think they should worry about attending school anymore.

      Schools and other programs are on the other side of the coin. Given a limited amount of funds, using funds for a tsunami warning network would take away from the amount you can devote to other public services.

      A warning network wouldn't be cheap either since you need to setup buoys several hundreds and/or thousands of kilometers out to see, monitor and analyze uplinks for the buoys and regularly service and replace the buoys. The funds for these could probably be used to set up and fund public health programs (vaccinations, public hosipitals, etc) or for some other social good.

      Given that the last tsunami in SE Asia/Indian subcontinent was in the 1890s, I can't fault the governments involved in prioritizing other needs first.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    36. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The U.S., candada and others should have an international team in place, even if it's only a few ppl to warn

      What!? It's the responsibility of the US to have a team in place to act on a moment's notice to run up and down the coast telling people to run away from the big wave coming?

      riiiigggghhhttt!

    37. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting we want illiterate and innumerate people running this system then?

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    38. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Do you think thousands of people on the coast of Bangladesh can move in land quickly enough?

      The tsunami often makes it about a half mile in-land. Iin many places there was up to TWO HOURS lead time between the quake and the tsunami hitting. That means you only have to manage 1/4 mile-per-hour. Someone with two broken legs can damn near manage that pushing along with just their arms.

      With as little as a 5 minute warning well more than half of those hit could have jogged to complete safety. With 15 minute warning you could probably get 98+% evacuation of all affected areas on foot. The only challenge is getting that message out.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    39. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Optali · · Score: 1

      Somalia was hit

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
  5. How's A.C. Clarke doing? by tuoppi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I don't remember exactly where A.C. Clarke is living, but it was at Sri Lanka - and in those videos I've seen, he's always walking on the beach.

    Makes me wonder if the old guy is still around.

    1. Re:How's A.C. Clarke doing? by bcmm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Couldn't you think of anything else to say about this disaster?
      And anway, Colombo is exactly on the wrong side of the island to be badly hit (assuming the quake was centered somewhere to the east of Sri Lanka (well the Maldives were hit).

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    2. Re:How's A.C. Clarke doing? by Rotund+Prickpull · · Score: 0
      Couldn't you think of anything else to say about this disaster?
      Which part of "News for Nerds" do you not understand?
    3. Re:How's A.C. Clarke doing? by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      Seeing as the first post on this thread was me asking that same question, I think redundancy can be your only excuse for being annoyed.

      And by the way, asking about the well being of one of the most notable science-fiction writers/inventors of all time on a tech-oriented website with relevence to the current topic is hardly something ill-natured to say, as you make it seem.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    4. Re:How's A.C. Clarke doing? by tuoppi · · Score: 1

      What should I say? Maybe I should tell how I feel for those who are suffering right now? Well. I am worried - diseases will attack the people as infrastructure has suffered major damage and there are alot of dead and injured people, but why should I tell that in slashdot? It doesn't help them in any way, and at the moment, I actually don't have any means of giving those people a hand. They most likely can't read slashdot at the moment so they could see how someone "feels for them" - or they might have some better things to do right now.

      Instead, I am trying to get information that interests me, as I haven't managed to notice anything about this in news.

    5. Re:How's A.C. Clarke doing? by AnuradhaRatnaweera · · Score: 1
      And anway, Colombo is exactly on the wrong side of the island to be badly hit (assuming the quake was centered somewhere to the east of Sri Lanka (well the Maldives were hit).
      Not exactly. Cities in the eastern coast, such as Trincomale, Batiacaloa, Muttur etc. have been hit badly, but it will take longer for get news from these areas. At noon today, just few hours after the first wave, 150 bodies had been brought to the Muttur general hospital.
    6. Re:How's A.C. Clarke doing? by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0
      What should I say? Maybe I should tell how I feel for those who are suffering right now?
      Not that I don't care, but nothing will bring the victims back, least of all us moping about it.

      It's simply not enough to care, you have to be seen to be caring. One way to do this is to go on and on and on about it ad freakin' nauseam; another is to criticise anybody who doesn't go on and on and on about it ad freakin' nauseam. So, if you aren't wailing and bawling and playing at "sadder than thou" you're a heatless bastard, and that's official. Did you not get the memo? It was headed "Queen of Hearts" or "People's Princess", I think.

      Probably the best defence is to prefix your posts with some bullshit platitude like "Not that I don't care, but nothing will bring the victims back, least of all us moping about it" - even if your post is about ethernet drivers or ancient Sumerian pottery. At least for two weeks until it's old news.

      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
  6. What about Indonesia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The quake was centered in Summara, an island in Indonesia. I bet that they got the brunt of this thing, so their loss should warrant mention too, I think.

    What's more, I hope that we in the first world waste no time getting aid over there. A lot of those countries lack the resources to deal with a tragedy on this scale.

    1. Re:What about Indonesia? by pe1rxq · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      -1 Religious asshole?

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:What about Indonesia? by northcat · · Score: 1

      India is sending aid to sri lanka. (Don't what aid, just saw it on TV) Its probably already sent, not sure though.

      The quake was centered in Summara, an island in Indonesia. I bet that they got the brunt of this thing

      Yeah, last time I checked, about 200 casualties. But its interesting (in a very sad way) that although the quake occured in Indonesia, bigger devastation has been seen in Sri Lanka (and India).

    3. Re:What about Indonesia? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The quake was centered in Summara, an island in Indonesia. I bet that they got the brunt of this thing... What's more, I hope that we in the first world waste no time getting aid over there. A lot of those countries lack the resources to deal with a tragedy on this scale.

      Problem is Northern Sumatra is having a lot of political unrest. It's basically been occupied by the army for decades, who have a good line in repression. (You may have heard what they did to East Timor a few years ago before they achieved independence.) Jakarta is unlikely to allow any foreign aid groups access, though they'll probably solicit money, food etc., and promise to deliver it themselves.

      From what I've heard on the news, many coastal villages, especially those built on stilt houses over the water, have been erased completely. There will never be an accurate death toll.

    4. Re:What about Indonesia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indonesia is Muslim.
      Allah will provide. We shouldn't bother. :)

    5. Re:What about Indonesia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indonesia is not all Muslim. There are over 200 islands their, each with a unique history. For example, Java is mostly Muslim, but Bali's primary religion is a mix of hinduism and local traditions.

      And I still insist that we should try to help them if we can, :P

    6. Re:What about Indonesia? by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      4000+ now

    7. Re:What about Indonesia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Indonesia is Muslim.

      3 words, and 200000000 people got a stamp on their forehead by your words, and therefore:

      > We shouldn't bother. :)

      Nice attitude. Whatever they are, you is apparently not Christian.

    8. Re:What about Indonesia? by thisgooroo · · Score: 1

      just have a look at te map: the epicenter was nortwest of the tip of sumatra (in the gukf of bengalia), so the tsunami would just hit that tip, otherwise run mostly parallel to the coast, so woulkdn't effect sumatra too much. the other indonesian islands would be shirlded by the malay pensinsula. sri lanke, india, bangla dash, thailand, malaysia, and probably myanmar (burma) coastlines, otoh, would get the full brunt of it.

    9. Re:What about Indonesia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron, it's NOT OUR problem.......these pissant third world countries take every dollar they get from UN or where ever and spend it on >>>>>>Military crap.......these governments could care less about their people as long as they can have the latest F-15.......

  7. More earthquake links by zxSpectrum · · Score: 4, Informative

    I keep a list of earthquake related resources.

  8. Re:This is Geek news? by s3pHiRoTh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess the news here are supposed to be stuff that matters. This matters.

  9. Brother vacationing Thailand... by RefuX · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yeah my brother and wife (John and Brigette) are currently in Thailand and were planning to dive today... unfortunatly I have no idea where in Thailand they are....

    He hasn't cotacted me yet, but even if he wanted to I doubt he could.

    Fingers crossed!

    p.s. The British Foreign office have set up an emergency help line: 0207 008 0000, I havn't been able to get through yet, its really busy.

    1. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lend you my fingers.

    2. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by BigJim.fr · · Score: 1

      My cousin is currently on Koh-Phangan Island, but it is on the northern coast of Thailand and the wave hit the southern coast. More information : http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4125 847.stm

    3. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by hughk · · Score: 1
      As you quote a UK help line, I guess you are UK based so you have GSM phones.If your brother has a mobile then he may be able to at least SMS even if he can't call. Phuket (and surrounding islands) is the main diving location but although it is badly damaged, there seem to be fewer deaths.

      Good luck!

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    4. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by Teun · · Score: 1
      An acquaintance lives & works on the Island of Phuket (yes, a lucky bastard), his shell access from his home to the xs4all.nl server in Amsterdam never went down.
      He has already posted some pictures online.

      Therefore I imagine that an internet shop would be the best bet to call home.

      The government numbers are only pacifiers until the affected people themselves contact their home authorities, which is obviously not their first priority...

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    5. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by RefuX · · Score: 1

      no email yet. Hopefully he's busy tooling around inland Thailand and it hasn't even occured to him to call me!

    6. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      If they were planning on a dive, it is likely they were in the south (hardest hit area). I am currently in Bangkok, finishing a 2 week long trip. I didnt even feel the quake!

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
    7. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by W2k · · Score: 1

      Earlier today, I had no trouble getting through via regular GSM to my friends, who are vacationing in Thailand (just northeast of Phuket) right now. Maybe you should give that a try.

      --
      Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    8. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      y cousin is currently on Koh-Phangan Island, but it is on the northern coast of Thailand and the wave hit the southern coast.

      Actually, Ko Phangan is off the EAST coast; the tsunami hit the WEST coast.

    9. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by caino59 · · Score: 1

      links to said pics?

    10. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by Teun · · Score: 1
      Sorry, no slashdotting alowed

      But I'll give a hint, usenet xs4all.general

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    11. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck.

    12. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is WiFI aplenty all over Thailand and Malaysia. Skype works great from just about anywhere. DSL lines in Internet cafes on Koh Phangen (Full moon party), and Phukit.

      DSL Speeds are quite good, but then who can tell what damage might have been done to their phone system.

      The popular Full Moon beach on Koh Phangen is on the South eastern edge of the Island, but the Island is on the other side of the penninsula, so the wave would have to detour around the tip of Singapor.

      The Thai phone system is quite modern, mostly digital, but lots of DSL.

    13. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by thisgooroo · · Score: 1

      since when does thailand have a northern coast?

    14. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by RefuX · · Score: 1

      Email I just got:

      >Hello James
      >
      >Stephanie received a text message Sunday afternoon local time >asking her to call Brigid's parents to say they where ok.
      >Apparently they were in Phuket.
      >Will let you know if I get any more news.
      >Merry Christmas
      >Peter

    15. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by RefuX · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well just got off the phone with Bridget's folks.
      It was a very close call, Bridget got up in the morning, looked out of the window and saw it coming.
      John and Briget started running
      On the way they overtook one person, he was unable to keep up.
      Some others who they were running with showed them the way to safety, the one guy they overtook, heh didn't make it...
      John's feet got badly cut up and they lost alot of their items.

    16. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP!

    17. Re:Brother vacationing Thailand... by automatix · · Score: 1
      An email from a friend, on holiday in Thailand:

      Hi All,

      Just letting you all know, especially those who paid close attention to my itinerary detail rantings, that although Muzz and I headed for Phuket today, all is well.

      It is a strange story. We should have, by all accounts, been at the patong beach hotel, where we are booked in for tonight (my christmas present to murray). That hotel is now completely underwater.

      Instead, our plane was delayed an hour for refuelling and we departed KL for Phuket at 11am, much to our dissatisfaction. After reaching thai airspace and beginning our decent into phuket airport, the plane backed up and circled. the pilot then announced that neither Phuket or Bangkok air traffic control were responding to communications.

      We circled and circled until the pilot, quite frankly and worringly, stated he was giving up communication and heading back to KL. so thats where we went.

      But we are now finding out about what happened. News is still breaking (its 5 pm here) but we think that the tsunami hit patong beach, and our hotel, no more than 10 minutes before our ETA (which had of course been delayed an hour).

      so, instead of being in a disaster area we're both here in KL at the Hart's house drinking tea and eating chocolate biscuits watching CNN.

      so this is just to let you know all is well. we dont know what we're going to do now, we got a refund on the flights and might go somewhere else instead.

      hope you are well...im off to eat my biscuits and have a drink.

  10. Re:This is Geek news? by mOoZik · · Score: 1

    Not only that, geologists and such people can also be nerds. Seeing how this event is record-setting - in terms of magnitude - and also given the huge loss of life, it is apt, IMO.

  11. Quake Coordinates by Shag · · Score: 1
    According to the helpful earthquake hazard folks over at USGS, the epicenter coordinates were 3.30 N 95.78 E, with a depth of about 10km. There are quite a lot of other entries in that region since, some or all of which may be aftershocks.

    (A friend in Madras mentioned the quake as soon as he felt it; I've since seen the estimates go from 650 dead to 1500, 3000, 4500, 6300, and now 7000.)

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  12. This isn't news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all it is only thousands of "little brown people".Not Princess Diana or anybody important.
    The real story is hoe BUSH stole the election in Ohio through electronic voting fraud and that Kerry is the real President!

  13. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by Ralconte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Geeks who were online found out about it pretty quickly. I heard about it on Fark. :P People in fishing villages and vacation sites my have missed the info, to their peril.

    If you need a tech discussion, here's one, "How can you get the info to the people who needed it?"

    Once the earthquake hit with a sea floor epicenter, everyone with a web browser knew a tsunami was going to hit somewhere. Again, no way to tell the people who needed the information. Seemed like the only thing we could do was just wait for news of further death.

  14. Re:Stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll my ass. Many people reading this story immediately recognize that this is one of the many terrible events to happen in the world that isn't "geek news". We read other sites too.

  15. Video? by Macfox · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have links to videos of the event?

    Tried Reuters, but there's not much to see.

    --
    Area51 - We are watching...
    1. Re:Video? by bugbeak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out the BBC News site. There is a link that says "Live Video", given that the earthquake is top news ATM.

    2. Re:Video? by Xeo+024 · · Score: 1

      No video, but there are a lot of pictures (includes both AP and Reuters images).

    3. Re:Video? by mad+zambian · · Score: 1

      Try the BBC for the article and links to some video of the aftermath. (Real and wmv streams available)

      --
      Trying to associate Microsoft with "fun" is like trying to associate Satan with aromatherapy. -Tycho
    4. Re:Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the reports I've seen I'd guess it will be a day or 2 before we see videos of the actual events - long enough for Australians and other nationals to get home with their camcorders and then hand the tapes over to their local news stations...

    5. Re:Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can see some pictures here. They're from a Norwegian newspaper.

      http://www.vg.no/pub/vgart.hbs?artid=260157

    6. Re:Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was some video on news on our local tv at malaysia. next news will be between 6 - 7 am (GMT +8)
      http://www.rtm.net.my/english/web/users/login .php

    7. Re:Video? by Jack+Greenbaum · · Score: 1
      Mod me Redundant

      -- Jack

    8. Re:Video? by kjcdude · · Score: 0

      I have some videos on my site http://diabloheat.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file =viewtopic&t=235 also here are direct links to the videos http://kyle.theocsucks.com/modules.php?name=Downlo ads&d_op=getit&lid=10 http://kyle.theocsucks.com/modules.php?name=Downlo ads&d_op=getit&lid=8 http://kyle.theocsucks.com/modules.php?name=Downlo ads&d_op=getit&lid=11 http://kyle.theocsucks.com/modules.php?name=Downlo ads&d_op=getit&lid=9 http://kyle.theocsucks.com/modules.php?name=Downlo ads&d_op=getit&lid=7

      --
      http://DiabloHeat.com | http://Kyle.TheOCSucks.com | http://TheOCSucks.com
  16. Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually only the preceeding earthquake is unpredictable. When you know where the epicenter of the earthquake is and the topography and makeup of the ocean floor, you can see where the resulting tsunamis (if any are created) will hit hardest.

    Unfortunately, you don't have much time between the quake and the tsunami hitting. I hear if Canary Island (The one ready to fall into the sea and wipe out the east coast) would cause a tsunami that could travel across the Atlantic Ocean in 45 minutes, and I read on the BBC that this most recent tsunami was going 2,000km/h, which seems to be roughly the same speed. Mind boggling though.

    Also hurting any warning effort is how do you get a mass warning out to places like Sri Lanka? There's no mass media infrastructure and only the minimum of transport infrastructure. I suppose part of this tragedy is how unavoidable it was in these nations' current states. Only Japan has invested any significant amount of money in Tsunami warning systems.

    --
    Yup...
    1. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan has the infrastructure because they know they need it - the pacific rim is much more active causing more of these things. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it is exactly this scarcity that caused the recent quake to be so enormous.

    2. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Rob+Carr · · Score: 1
      I hear if Canary Island (The one ready to fall into the sea and wipe out the east coast) would cause a tsunami that could travel across the Atlantic Ocean in 45 minutes, and I read on the BBC that this most recent tsunami was going 2,000km/h, which seems to be roughly the same speed.

      Nah. 500 mph seems to be a bout top speed quoted on the net. That's only about 800 kph - and Sri Lanka is about 1000 miles from the epicenter. There was time. Not much, and apparently not enough.

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    3. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Xenna · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Every country on earth has radio and TV, if you call them and let them broadcast a warning it will be heard. Hell, many people (tourists, expats) watch CNN via satellite so even that might work.

      OTOH I don't think Tsunami's are a common event in this region so no one is prepared. If these things travel as fast as they say you're pretty much SOL.

      I heard that in Krabi (Thailand) people notice the sea withdrawing uncharacteristically about 5 minutes before the first wave hit. Anyone can explain that?

    4. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Rob+Carr · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I heard that in Krabi (Thailand) people notice the sea withdrawing uncharacteristically about 5 minutes before the first wave hit. Anyone can explain that?

      As the wave approaches shore, the speed changes and the amplitude increases markedly. The water had to come from somewhere - as the wave approaches, the "tide" appears to pull back - but it will be replaced.

      There's a Japanese story (don't know if it's true or a legend) about a man near his grainery on a hill who saw the water rushing out. The only way to warn the people below was to set fire to his grainery. Everyone came running to put the fire out....

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    5. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll try to remember that next time I'm on a beach. I have been in Krabi and Phuket/Patong so it feels close to home in a way.

      I remember thinking about sudden huge waves while lying on beaches and how long it would take before you realized something was wrong.

      Only this year in the South of France a sudden change in the weather killed 3 bathers right in front of our apartment. :(

      Best be careful out there.

    6. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      There was ample time - the P-wave of the quake hit Madras, India at about 6.30 AM (local time), about 4 minutes after the quake occurred. However, the Tsunami reached only at about 9 - 9.30 AM (local time), giving a clear 2.5 to 3 hours after the quake.

    7. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1

      That is normal for tsunamis.

      --
      Stop the world; I need to get off.
    8. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      My girl and I saw this news earlier today and heard that Phuket got plastered and that many people were missing. I told her a story about how, when I was in HS in Hawaii about twenty years ago, there was a giant earthquake in Alaska, and I was kept at school until about 11:00pm because my house was in the zone that could've been destroyed, about three blocks from the beach. Scary.

      I am waiting to hear the final death toll on this. Should be huge...

    9. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by ToKsUri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which is that Canary Island you are talking about that is ready to fall into the sea?? I live here in one of the 7 canary islands, and as far as I know they are all pretty stable. Ok, we have a 4km high volcano called Teide but it is quite dormant, and lets hope it continues like that for a long time. But never have heard of any island falling into the sea.

    10. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by AnuradhaRatnaweera · · Score: 1
      Also hurting any warning effort is how do you get a mass warning out to places like Sri Lanka? There's no mass media infrastructure and only the minimum of transport infrastructure.
      Media infrastructure is not that bad here, and transport system is good enough for this type of an evacuation, given that there were two hours from the time the earthquake took place to the time the waves hit Sri Lanka. However, I don't think they did a good job in using the media to bring about a reasonable warning, which would have made a big difference in the number of lives lost (2500 so far :-( ).
    11. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A sudden, abnormal "low tide" is one of the few warning signs for a tsunami. This unexpected exposure of the sea floor lures many victims to their deaths. If you ever see it happen, don't stay to investigate or ask questions--run for high ground as if your life depends on it--it does!

    12. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Malc · · Score: 1

      I don't watch CNN when I'm at home, least of all when I'm travelling ;)

      To be honest, as a tourist, I'm not going to be watching any TV or listening to the radio. With less than an hours warning, I don't think I would have had any advance notice of this. The funny thing is, I work from home so I would probably have had more chance of a warning of such a thing as a tourist. Radio and TV are only any good if you're paying attention to them (which I don't for most of the day), or you're in contact with people who do (which again, I don't for most of the day). So it's rather presumptuous to assume this.

      My heart goes out to these people. What happened was horrific. I have friends who honeymooned in the Maldives a couple of years ago. Those islands are already suffering from rising sea levels, a 5 m wave would have just completely covered some areas - even with advance warning there's little they could have done in time.

    13. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Xenna · · Score: 1

      You're lucky then that some of us do and could warn the others. I remember having breakfast in a Krabi place with CNN on in a corner of the room.

      I usually take long holidays especially to American standards and I do like to keep an eye on what's going on in the world. CNN or BBC world are available in most tourist places in Asia, most other stations are in the local language so it's an easy choice.

      Phuket, Krabi and Koh Phi Phi have plenty of higher altitude locations so even a 30 minute advance warning could have made a huge difference if only to clear the beaches. The maldives may well be a different story. I've never been there, but I hear it's quite flat, I also heard it wasn't hit that badly.

    14. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      The 2000 km/h figure is wrong: the speed depends on the depth of the ocean, but doesn't exceed 700-800 km/h (wikipedia says 700, I've seen 800 somewhere else).

      Anyway, at least in India they had enough time to warn people, but it seems that didn't happen.

    15. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 1

      I suppose CNN would be a possability but to be honest I've found them to be woefully inadequate as an information source (this applies to pretty much every 24 hour news provider, except for two or three British channels), if there was something to warn people in Asia about, my question is would they do it?

      Not only do most of the news networks that happen to be broadcast to hotel rooms internationally reflect almost exclusively American interests, when they mention international events that do so after the fact. Were the governments of the countries affected to put out a warning to people to get to high ground, would CNN pick up on the message and broadcast it as a public service? I find it unlikely that they would do anything beyond that little tickertape they run along the bottom of the screen.

      --
      Yup...
    16. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      What's really shameful is that here in the US, Fox News Channel is the only outlet that's covering this, and generally the only one that covers any story that takes place on the weekend. CNN and MSNBC are still running their people magazine tripe.

    17. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ever should happen to notice a very large "suckage" near a beach, head for high ground immediately, and get inland as fast as possible. You only would have a few minutes to get away.

      Of course most people would not recognize this as a threat, but if I noticed what the normal water level is, and sudddenly see the water line receed way out to sea, I know I certainly would notice it, and take action.

    18. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Well here in Europe CNN have been running this story almost continuously since I turned on my TV ~9 hours ago. I think CNN have different 'versions' world wide.

    19. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Diag · · Score: 1

      Yes we get an Asian CNN here in Australia which has been covering this continually. Also BBC World and Sky Australia (which switches to Sky UK overnight).

      Last night the only network that WASN'T covering this here was Fox, which we get straight from the US. But it was probably 4AM in the US at that time and they were showing O'Really reruns.

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    20. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Zemran · · Score: 1

      The tide rushes out and any (poor and maybe uneducated) people see lots of stranded fish waiting to be served to the family for dinner. Those that have been to anywhere that educates people about the dangers of tsunami knew to run but some local people seize the opportunity and rush out onto the sea bed. Often tourists wander out to investigate the strange event, they also die. Most wealthy places around the pacific tell the people about the fact that before a tsunami the tide will recede before the approaching tidal wave. One person in the south of Thailand (Phuket) yesterday said the sea went out a very long way and she ran inland and lived although she still had to face the flood that followed her into the shop where she sought shelter. Most of the shops etc in this area are little more than wooden sheds and offered little defence.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    21. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Drudge Report was what first alerted me at around 10:00PM PST (Seattle), then the BBC live feed and USGS. Nothing on the TV (Fox, CNN, Local) even as late as 1:00AM. It it wasn't for the internet I wouldn't have known about this until this morning.

    22. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by will_die · · Score: 1

      The tsunami from the Canary Island would take longer then that. From a couple of sites it would take around 6 hours to reach England, the wake would travel over 1 mile in land and the wave would be around 40 feet tall. It would take less then an hour to reach africa.
      To reach the US would take around 7 hours and because of the open ocean would reach about 20 miles in land and be around 200 feet tall.
      Speed at land fall would be around 500 mph for both places.

    23. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Optali · · Score: 1

      > I don't think Tsunami's are a common event in this region so no one is prepared.

      Indeed the Maldivas archipielago had no emergency response plans at all, they live 2.500 Km away from the epicenter in the middle of the Indian ocean between Africa and Asia, the last thing they would expect would be a earthquake in Sumatar affecting their coast.

      What I wonder about is the fact that in spite the high volcanic activity in the zone tsunamis seems
      actually to be rare in this zone, I read that it was the first time such a phenomenon reached the Indian coasts, so this could explain why nobody took any preventive messure.

      You USians indeed have a very accurate surveilance system in the Pacific (NOAA and the USGS), as those monster waves are relatively frecuent in the pacific, but there is also more time for evacuation. Yesterdays's tsunami travelled at 800Km/h and crossed the 1.600 Km from Sumatra to Thailand in 30m, the earthquake's shockwave arrived in India about 3h later and the tsunami hit the coast other 30m later.

      As India and Malaysia are well equipped and reminding that Indonesia has lots of international volcanologic observatorys I would thing that this disaster was fully unexpected and very uncommon.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    24. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by Optali · · Score: 1

      El Hierro. Not the whole island, but a good part of it. This is a frecuent (geologically speaking) phenomenon in volcanic islands, the same is expected to take place in Hawai... AFAIK the last time such a thing happened in el Hierro was 50.000 before current, you will prolly have to wait 50.000 years more if you want to take pictures of this, LOL

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    25. Re:Not unpredictable, but probably unavoidable. by qoa · · Score: 1

      CNN had near nonstop coverage over the last couple of days.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
  17. Is there even enough time to react? by Moskie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What kind of time delay are we talking about between when the earthquake strikes and when the tsunami forms/hits the coast? I always imagined it was something very short, somewhere near a few minutes.

    What could be done in that short amount of time, exactly?

    1. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by Rob+Carr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What kind of time delay are we talking about between when the earthquake strikes and when the tsunami forms/hits the coast? In deep water, a tsunami goes about 500 mph. Not much time for folks in Sumatra, but the people of Sri Lanka might have been warned.

      As near as I can figure out, all the tsunami warning efforts are focused on the Pacific rim. There simply aren't enough tsunamis elsewhere to make it worth the effort. Or at least so the theory went.

      Why someone with a seismograph didn't look at the 8.9, look at a map, see the Indian ocean and go "Ya know, maybe we should warn someone" is beyond me. I guess 2 hours isn't that long when you don't have set procedures in place. Still....

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    2. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by ashwinds · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Same thing has been bothering me too - guess they never did look at a tsunami possibility. We felt tremors at 6.30 AM - i looked up the seismology at USGS and saw Indonesia's quake -I did look at the map and said gee - there is just the sea between us - but I did not imagine a tsunami would wash ashore - but hey - Iam not the Met or the Oceanography guys - I am sure quiet a few people who could have done something stayed quiet. Even 2 hrs is enough to clear families from the shoreline - they need not have died - we lost about a 100 of them here in Chennai.

    3. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by Rob+Carr · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I am sure quiet a few people who could have done something stayed quiet.

      Realize that, like yourself, many did not associate the earthquake with a tsunami. CSI Miami (a US TV show) had a tsunami hit Florida in the program. So right now, when I hear "earthquake" and "water" my brain's primed to think "tsunami."

      I imagine that a lot of earthquake people have the knowledge and training that they, too would think "earthquake." But they still may have been caught by surprise. The places that were close by could not be warned, and how many would have thought "hmmm - Sri Lanka's gonna get it?" It's a thousand miles away. Again, it may not have occurred to everyone.

      For those it did occur to, there's the question "What do you do?" There may have been an assumption - "someone's got the job to issue the warning." If there is an appropriate "responder," often you can make things worse by trying to get involved and tying up resources as a result. So some may not have bothered because they thought that it would be handled. Others may simply not have known who to call.

      I'm sitting here wondering. Let's say I'd been online looking at an Earthquake page when the 8.9 quit. Who would I have called to warn about a tsunami hitting Sri Lanka? I don't think I'd have thought my calling would do any good, first off. But let's say I put it all together and decided to start making calls. Who would I call? The Sri Lankan embassy? 911?

      I have no freakin' idea.

      This is why public safety organizations have emergency drills. Stuff like this happens and you do what you do every day. Who's job is it every day to warn the people of the Indian ocean if there's a tsunami? No one. So everyone did in the emergency what they do every day, which turns out to be just that - nothing.

      The more I think of it, the more this looks like one of those events you learn from. At this point the question is, how much do you learn?

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    4. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by Rob+Carr · · Score: 1
      You preview and still you miss the typos.

      Third paragraph of the parent article - the second "earthquake" should be "tsunami."

      Sigh.

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    5. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by elpapacito · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah rather then "bothering" I'd say it is troubling, very much so.

      1. Tsunami are not a new scientific discovery
      2. Tsunami happen rather frequently
      3. Tsunami can be pretty fucking devastating , killing thousands and destroying billions of goddamned property
      4. Seismic networks aren't science fiction or experimental genetics, but a _reality_

      So I think, what the fuck is needed to make some world seismic network with early warning ? We can make ONU, but we can't make one fucking seismic early warning network which, in layman terms, is a bunch of computers with telephone or satellite lines and a couple thousand people for maintenance ?

      I guess that the next days we'll hear that

      a. given that the quake was a rare event ( my ass is more rare there have been 5 of that in the last 100 years)

      b. that the countries involved are piss poor with poor communication infrastructure ( RADIO goddamit Marconi invented it more then a 100 ago it still works ! Even U.S. NOAA still uses radio ! )

      c. that there was some bureocratic problem (there are always buro problems, no matter if republicans/dems/martians are in charge)

      d. that there was some economic efficiency problem (there are always economic problems unless you're the one paying for everything, but hey we have skyscrapers full of people counting money...cute)

      Therefore thousand died..and we dare call ourselves civilized and advanced, we're bloody apes.

    6. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by Jeremy+Singer · · Score: 1

      Without a procedure, what would you do? Call the local police station? List all the surrounding countries and try to call their presidents one by one? Submit the story to Slashdot?

    7. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by thisgooroo · · Score: 1
      given that the quake was a rare event ( my ass is more rare there have been 5 of that in the last 100 years)

      sure, but have a look where they occurred: all in the pacific. the indian ocean isn't exactly well known for this kind of event. afaik, the last big tsunami there was in 1883 (krakatoa)

      blizzards are also widely known, but i doubt you would think of setting up a blizzard warning system in southern arizona or southern florida

    8. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by Rob+Carr · · Score: 1
      Without a procedure, what would you do?

      The best might be to call the embassy. But who knows if you can get anyone at the embassy, especially after hours.

      Freelance warning systems could also be a major problem. Picture the Slashdot user base and pretend you're the 911 equivalent in The Grand Republic of Beachside. See the problem?

      This may be one of those things where, come Monday morning, The Powers That Be need to sit down and set up an official warning system.

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    9. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "For those it did occur to, there's the question "What do you do?""

      As with earthquakes and tornadoes, you plan ahead when you build things (by doing things like raising buildings and presenting as few broad surfaces to the sea as possible). Things like this have been added to the building codes in Hawaii after tsunamis hit Hilo several times in the Twentieth Century.

      IIRC, with Hawaii's advantage of being fairly distant from major fault lines, they also have a fairly decent early warning system with sirens and such placed here and there, much like you see in the plains states WRT tornadoes. The only real problems there are the "false positives," since they currently have little idea how big (i. e. small) an incoming tsunami may be.

      Of course, being in a "First World" country helps...

    10. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by elpapacito · · Score: 1

      Well guess what ? It happened and now more or less 50K people are dead. Maybe a lot more, maybe we'll never know as sea will not give back all the bodies.

      But hey if that happened in Europe or America, you'd be hearing outcries, heads would "roll" and many politicians would be tiptapping on burning coal.

      Or maybe not and that's why things like that can still happen in year 2000.

  18. Re:In.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's redundant because the joke has been said probably hundreds of times and everyone has heard it. Not only that, but it should have been modded down anyway for being in bad taste.

  19. Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Redundant only applies to posts in the current story.

  20. Re:This is Geek news? by moonbender · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, Slashdot does post major event stories from time to time - in fact they make up a large part of the hall of fame. They typically deal with events that are related to the US, despite the fact that a significant part of the readership isn't American. Considering how the story summary is one order of magnitude off - many thousands, not hundreds died - this certainly is a major story and I don't mind seeing it on Slashdot.

    On the other hand, why post this when you didn't report on the earthquake in Turkey, or the one in Iran about a year ago, etc? I guess it's because Sundays are slow news days.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  21. Mod parent down! by bcmm · · Score: 1

    That's pretty tasteless really, this is a major disaster and people have died.

    Pay some attention to the real world.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah yes, the moral clarity.
      hello baghdad.
      how many would you like to kill today?

    2. Re:Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, we have to deal with outsourcing - they have to deal with tsunamis and earthquakes. Just like everyone says when an american complains about losing their job "tough - get over it - - move somewhere else that you are more viable".

    3. Re:Mod parent down! by maximilln · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh quit whining. Our hearts can't bleed for everything.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    4. Re:Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember one thing - you get what you put out... I'd say your due for a shock.

    5. Re:Mod parent down! by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. Like we all didn't think it for a moment, at least. I'm not completely insenstive, and I'm very sorry that some have died, but if you can't laugh once in a while, you have some serious issues. Lighten up, Francis.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    6. Re:Mod parent down! by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you from the US? Probably more people have just died than died in 9/11 ... did you see *anyone* say anything as crass and insensitive then? Whether it affects you directly or not it affects a lot of slashdot readers.

      You, matey, are an arsehole.

    7. Re:Mod parent down! by maximilln · · Score: 1

      Cry me a river.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    8. Re:Mod parent down! by maximilln · · Score: 1

      Oh wait. Given context and all, I guess the more correct form would be,"Cry me a tsunami"

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    9. Re:Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey maximilln, you should change your login name to asshole -- it would suit you perfectly.

    10. Re:Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cry me a river.

      Cry me a tsunami!

  22. Re:Stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    They probably confused "geek" with "gook".

  23. 6300 dead at 15:13 GMT by fbjon · · Score: 5, Informative
    And it was around 3200 just a few hours ago. Here's the Reuters article. Watching BBC world, it appears that some northern areas of Sumatra still can't be reached, and the situation there is unknown. Here's a map of the affected area.

    It seems that a displacement in the sea bottom ocurred, moving 10-30 metres up along a rupture of 1000 km, causing a wave of hundreds of cubic kilometres of ocean water.

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    1. Re:6300 dead at 15:13 GMT by maximilln · · Score: 1

      That's a big effing wave. Just thinking about the amount of energy of all of that water swirling backwards from the original fault, along the sea floor, that entire way...

      whew.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    2. Re:6300 dead at 15:13 GMT by erikdalen · · Score: 1

      the energy released in a 8.9 earthquake is more than the total annual energy consumption of Sweden (9 million inhabitants). to give a bit of comparison :)

      --
      Erik Dalén
    3. Re:6300 dead at 15:13 GMT by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Remember these are all early reports, these numbers often go down. In the initial confusion a lot of people end up reported dead who are merely out of contact, and there are often duplicates. Hopefully that happened here.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    4. Re:6300 dead at 15:13 GMT by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      I heard yesterday about the earthquake and they mentioned that there were tidal waves along the Sumatran coast and a reported death toll of 3. Immediate reaction was to remember the death toll from the tsunamis that followed Krakatoa's destruction in 1883, around 30,000 dead (from memory). So I figured the final death toll was going to be very high (I'm sure there are more people in these villages now than in 1883). But last night in a late item they said that the earthquake was 8.9, my jaw dropped (literally). Those poor people. The death toll is going to be very very high I fear. Hope I am wrong. What's worse even as the toll mounts the towns nearest the epicentre are ominously quiet. Not much you can say about a tragedy like this, just pray to whatever deity or otherwise that you never experience that kind of trauma yourself, and that you can somehow help.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    5. Re:6300 dead at 15:13 GMT by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Just for the record, BBC is now reporting 20 000 dead at 12:30 gmt.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  24. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Hawaii, they have a system of warning sirens along the coast to warn people of tsunamis. Such a system ought to be more widely deployed in earthquake-prone regions.

  25. Latest News ... by sunsrin · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can find the latest news at http://news.google.co.in (The Indian Version of Google News )

  26. Software support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how the call centers will be on Monday morning? Yeah, I'm working... My CAD package is supported out of India.

    1. Re:Software support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you don't understand. Offshoring was supposed to INCREASE productivity by distributing contacts among the timezones! Surely this won't fail!

      Also, why the fuck is this being discussed on slashdot? Like there's a single sole that hasn't already seen the story elsewhre? For fuck's sake, Drudge has a world-is-wnding style headline o it, sstretching almost the entire page and EVERY STORY ON THE PAGE IS ABOUT THIS. There is no story that isn't about the stupid earthquakr. It's pretty hard to miss this stupid thing.

    2. Re:Software support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, "sole" is at the bottom of your feet, "SOUL" is what you're looking for...

    3. Re:Software support? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > > Like there's a single sole that hasn't already seen the story elsewhre?
      > Look, "sole" is at the bottom of your feet, "SOUL" is what you're looking for...

      It may not be on the soles, but shoes still have eyes! Haha... Eyes... "Seen the..." eh, never mind.

    4. Re:Software support? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Now we just need a disaster such as the restarting of the Pakistan-India nuclear arms race (and the resultant detonations) and we have ourselves a finished recipe for US job market revival by a disaster trifecta.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  27. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, instead of caring about the thousands of people who have died you seem to think your nationalistic pride is more important. Am I flaming hard enough?

    btw, those flames started after some of your countrymen stated that they didn't give a flying fuck because those people were on the other side of the planet.

    now, shut up and donate, it's the least (and only thing?) you can do.

  28. Re:How long until we blame America by fbjon · · Score: 1, Funny

    Let me try...

    [flame class="ignorant bashing"] Since there are now more than twice the casualties in a single event compare to 9/11, shouldn't we start a War on Tsunamis now? [/flame]

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  29. Re:This is Geek news? by cybergrue · · Score: 2, Funny

    A good friend of mine, and fellow slashdotter (Viduliya (39839)) is currently in Sri Lanka getting married. If he's OK, I'll joke with him about his earth shaking honeymoon when he gets back.

  30. Tsunami by sunsrin · · Score: 4, Informative

    More on Tsunami at Wikipedia

  31. Tech that would help? by aynrandfan · · Score: 1
    I have to ponder as to what kinds of technology could have made the impact from this disaster less horrendous than it was. Better monitoring for earthquakes, better medical care and better building materials for houses and such are some immediate things, although the latter two has more to do with socio-economic status than anything else.

    I'm thinking of keeping things relatively cheap, yet as functional as possible.

    --

    ----

    "Ours was a free culture. It is becoming much less so."-Lawrence Lessig

    1. Re:Tech that would help? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Not much really. The 2 richest countries on earth are both affected by earthquakes, and have invested heavily in the area of earthquake prediction(esp. Japan), and yet do not have very accurate earthquake prediction technologies. It may be possible, but not for a long, long while. Now technology for disaster relief is a different story, but for the time being cheap accurate earthquake prediction is a pipe dream.....

    2. Re:Tech that would help? by Shag · · Score: 1
      IMO, it's not so much technology that's the solution, as improved practices and policies.

      For example, it's generally not the greatest idea to build right by the ocean. This is true just about anywhere - on the eastern coast of North America, beachfront houses get nailed by hurricanes; here in Hawaii we get the occasional tsunami; just about anywhere there are issues of erosion and at times high surf.

      If you're somewhere - or across the water from somewhere - with seismic activity that can trigger tsunamis, this is even more true.

      We'll see whether the policymakers learn from this. Hilo, where I live, was nailed by a tsunami in 1946. The destroyed area was rebuilt - which turned out to be a bad idea since it got nailed again in 1960. Now it's all parks and memorials. (You can see more at the Pacific Tsunami Museum.)

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    3. Re:Tech that would help? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Two things:-

      a) Disaster management techniques: We in India need better processes in managing relief work after disaster has struck; compared to first-world standards, we're woefully under-equipped in terms of emergency medicine and an infrastructure that can rescue people within, say, two hours of something striking. Perhaps a volunteer force or something; we really can't be falling back on the Army each time shit happens.

      b) (My personal favourite) A redundant communication network: More ham radios/VSAT terminals/whatever throughout the nation. Cheap and requires more of a community participation than governmental intervention (which (a) would need).

    4. Re:Tech that would help? by kcelery · · Score: 1

      I just wonder how the Japanese would react to a 10 metre Tsuinami when they detected one and its gonna hit the coastline in 15 minutes.

    5. Re:Tech that would help? by will_die · · Score: 1

      We are starting to get some reports on the technology available, and the warning systems for the pacific ocean. The problem with this is that the event is extermly rare, and it is even rarer in the place it took place. So don't expect much to happen technology wise.
      The US USGS did send a warning but most of the countries effected were not one the list.

    6. Re:Tech that would help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if you indians were not so busy STEALING jobs from americans and canadiens.......you might be able to implement some form of emergency managment.........

  32. Full Moon by Shag · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course, this all happening at full moon will probably fuel the people who study whether the gravitational pull of the sun and moon impacts the occurrence of earthquakes like it does tides.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:Full Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      given that earthquakes has a tendency to surface in the media at Christmas time, I'd say it's much more likely to be Santa's fault than soggy moonboots. I'm sure the University of Tampere can fill us in on that.

      Or perhaps it's just the media.

    2. Re:Full Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      +5 interesting? Give me a break. The moon exerts the same gravity pull on earth whether it's full or not. It's like nobody on this site knows about science.

    3. Re:Full Moon by b1scuit · · Score: 1
      I can't imagine how it wouldn't though. (disclaimer) I have no real formal knowledge of either subject (/disclaimer), but it makes perfect sense that the pull of the massive body responsible for keeping the planet going around in a big circle, and the pull of the not-so-massive body that goes in a big circle around the planet would have some effect on it.

      Hell, the tides alone probably present some serious rythmic loading/unloading of the earth's crust. I know when I swing something heavy around it has a noticeable effect on me. I know when I'm swung around in a circle, it has a noticeable effect on me. I know when my cat jumps on my shoulder while I'm typing this, it, well you get the idea.

      I don't really care either way (nor do I have any idea, it's why other, smarter peopel are looking into it), but it's not like those people researching it are quacks or anything. It seems totally possible. To me, anyway.

    4. Re:Full Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely a full Moon is when the Moon and Sun are on opposite sides of the Earth and their gravitational effects cancel each other out somewhat? When the Moon is nearer the Sun than the Earth it is a New Moon, which we can't see because of the shadow. See here for a picture!

    5. Re:Full Moon by Shag · · Score: 1

      You're correct that the highest tides are expected around New Moon, when both the Sun and Moon are "pulling" on the same side. But they don't "cancel each other out" so much at Full Moon; things just get "stretched" in two directions, resulting in the second-highest high tides of the month (after the New Moon tides).

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    6. Re:Full Moon by Shag · · Score: 2, Informative
      I probably shouldn't dignify this with a reply, but:

      1. The moon's orbit is elliptical, and as any Slashdotter who "knows about science" can tell you, that means its gravitational pull on Earth varies. :)
      2. Even if the moon's gravitational pull didn't vary, the interplay between the gravitational pulls of the moon and the sun does vary, with the greatest combined effect occurring at new moon, the second-greatest at full moon, and the least effect at the quarters. (Read a tide table to see what I mean.)
      Hope this clarifies matters somewhat...
      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    7. Re:Full Moon by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      more like a lot of geologists didnt study ANY astronomy at all, there are very few scientists skilled at both sectors.

      And they have prooved that the moons orbit does effect the land like tides, they did GPS measurements and found the land does indeed move, but you cannot see/feel it.

      But dude, please do a statistical analysis of all quakes vs moon positions and get back to me.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    8. Re:Full Moon by Zardus · · Score: 1

      GPS isn't that accurate. I think its accurate to within a meter for military applications, and less so for civilian. Are you saying that gravitational force from the moon moves land by over a meter? (I'm genuinely curious)

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    9. Re:Full Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full Moon? What does that have to do with an earthquake? So, light viewed off the moon by people has everyone outside looking up, and that made a 620 Mile plate (chunk of earth's crust) unstable?

    10. Re:Full Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Single measurement with GPS is than inaccurate. However, since the deviation can be assumed to be Gaussian, with multiple measurements you can get very accurate results. I've seen this done when I was measuring geomagnetic field lines in one of our air force bases during my civil service.

    11. Re:Full Moon by Shag · · Score: 1
      Heh. Yeah. The university I work for has an Institute for Astronomy and an Institute for Geology and Planetary Science. Planetary Science apparently isn't the same as Astronomy... it's all confusing. :) I've heard that last time the two tried to get together, the Planetary Science folks wanted images of something that moves non-sidereally, but didn't provide the non-sidereal rates. Whoops.

      Next month, I get to see what happens when the Planetary Science folks take a hyperspectral imager (infrared thingummy that can image water temperatures, spot land mines, yadda yadda, when slung under an aircraft), turn it upside-down, mount it on the Astronomy folks' telescope as a "spectropolarimeter", and point it at the Moon.

      (This, too, I find confusing. But I think it has something to do with analyzing the geology of the Moon's surface by measuring its reflectivity in certain infrared wavelengths.)

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    12. Re:Full Moon by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I think it has something to do with analyzing the geology of the Moon's surface by measuring its reflectivity in certain infrared wavelengths

      IANA(Planetary Geologist), but I believe you are pretty much spot-on with your description. Different materials reflect different wavelengths. In addition, the difference in times between sending the signals & receiving the reflections can give a very good map of topography. The two of those combined can give very interesting results.

      For instance, if most craters of X depth show a rock layer under the surface, but another very similar crater is covered by some other material, it's probably MUCH older than the others. This is very useful information. Unfortunately, since IANAPG, I'm not sure how.

      It could conceivably "see" materials or features that "shouldn't be there," (in the unlikely event they are) forcing us to rethink our understanding of the moon.

    13. Re:Full Moon by cutesatyrboy · · Score: 1

      N Rajeshwar Rao and N Venkatanathan claim to have predicted this earthquake, based on their planetary alignment model http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/holnus/00220041 2291719.htm http://216.132.172.10/indiadaily/editorial/12-28c- 04.asp

  33. Energy release by SteveAstro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can anyone put some kind of comparision between the energy release here and the energy release of the prospective planet impactor 2004MN4 ? It would help to put things into scale, if not perspective.

    If MN4 were to hit, estimated release is 450-2000 MT of TNT, so how does a Richter 8.9 compare.

    Steve

    1. Re:Energy release by Snarfangel · · Score: 5, Informative

      A 9.0 earthquake would release the equivalent of 1,800 Megatons, so it would be in the same ballpark.

      --
      This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
    2. Re:Energy release by Antti+Luode · · Score: 0

      I think the estimated impact energy from mn4 would be 1900 mt of TNT, which would be about 1.9 billion tons of tnt, meanwhile the energy unleashed by this earthquake is estimated at 32 billion tons of tnt.

      But you can not really compare asteroids and earthquakes, one is spread out in huge area, while the other is a pinpoint hit..

    3. Re:Energy release by SteveAstro · · Score: 1

      but the epicentre is very small isn't it , so a comparison is reasonable ?

      I found a formula which attempts to give a rough Joule equivalent
      http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Mathematics/geoma th/logcontex t/qn2.html ...which I then translate at roughly 450 MT yield.

      Steve

    4. Re:Energy release by Antti+Luode · · Score: 0

      I found the 32billion ton quote from here: http://www.virtuelvis.com/archives/488.html Your info is probably more right on.

    5. Re:Energy release by RockDork · · Score: 3, Informative

      Earthquakes over M8.0 are called 'great,' as in catastrophic, for a good reason...

      There are several kinds of earthquake 'magnitude' measures, all of which yield similar numbers. Moment magnitude may be converted directly to energy:

      Magnitude = log (energy in ergs)/1.5 - 10.7

      For moment magnitude 8.9, this works out to 2.5 x 10^29 ergs, which is about 6 Million Megatons of TNT. The impact of 2004MN4 works out to an earthquake magnitude 6.2 to 6.6.

    6. Re:Energy release by erikdalen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      my encyclopedia (a swedish one) says the energy released from a 9.0 earthquake is a bit more than the annual energy consumption of sweden (9 million inhabitants).

      --
      Erik Dalén
    7. Re:Energy release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      however, an asteroid crashing into land could cause temporary climate change, something an earthquake can't do.

    8. Re:Energy release by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

      That seems wrong... an 8.0 is equivalent to ~1,000 Megatons of TNT. Reference

      This energy released by this quake was ~30,000 Megatons!

    9. Re:Energy release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to my geology textbook,
      The amount of energy released in a 9.0 magnitude earthquake is:
      20,000,000,000,000,000,000 ergs
      In contrast, the annual US energy consumption is:
      630,000,000,000,000,000,000 ergs

    10. Re:Energy release by bubbaprog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Richter is a logarithmic scale, not linear.

    11. Re:Energy release by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Why do people studying BIG THINGS always use rediculuously tiny units. cxample: I took an astronomy course once where all the units were ergs, centimeters and grams.. we were talking about size and distances of PLANETS!

      1 erg = 1.0 × 10-07 Joules or 1 erg = 2.39 × 10-11 kilocalories A good light beer might be about 140ish kcal.

      Conversion from earthquake magnitude to beers drunk is left as an exercise to the reader.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    12. Re:Energy release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are correcting the parent poster who was obviously thinking that 7.0 richter quake would have been the equivalent of roughly minus 28000 million tons of TNT?

    13. Re:Energy release by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      That's way too high. I found a powerpoint presentation that contains that figure, but they've got the calculation wrong. They say the energy released by a 9.0 is 3.98 x 10^18 J or 32,000MT, but since 1 MT is 4.18x10^15 J the correct megatonnage of a 9.0 is around 950MT.

      All the other sources I've found work out to about 300MT for a 8.9, which agrees with 950MT for a 9.0 (since an increase in Richter scale magnitude of 1.0 represents an 32-fold increase in energy release). See here (cached, original no longer found) for one reference.

    14. Re:Energy release by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      That table looks wrong. For example, they have a 1.0 equivalent to 30 pounds of TNT, but a 2.0 (which should be 32 times more energy) equivalent to 1 ton of TNT. But 30 x 32 = 960 pounds = 0.5 tons. Most sources seem to work about 1000MT for a 9.0, so that table seems to have the Richter magnitude out by one.

    15. Re:Energy release by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Can you provide a source for that? Most of the stuff I've been able to find has a 9.0 around 1000MT, or 300MT for an 8.9 (e.g. here).

    16. Re:Energy release by Snarfangel · · Score: 1

      Earthquake energy statistics from About.com

      I also saw the 1,000 MT figure for 9.0 magnitude quakes on other pages. I'm not sure where the discrepancy lies, though perhaps there is a range of energy possible for a given magnitude of quake. Since the possible range for an impact of 2004MN4 is in same order of magnitude, it makes for a fair approximation.

      --
      This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
    17. Re:Energy release by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      I also saw the 1,000 MT figure for 9.0 magnitude quakes on other pages. I'm not sure where the discrepancy lies, though perhaps there is a range of energy possible for a given magnitude of quake. Since the possible range for an impact of 2004MN4 is in same order of magnitude, it makes for a fair approximation.
      I suspect some of these tables are created by figuring out one of the lower magnitudes and then just multiplying up the scale. Any small error would get magnified. I see this quake has now been revised to a 9.0 so the comparison is even more valid now.
    18. Re:Energy release by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "A 9.0 earthquake would release the equivalent of 1,800 Megatons,"

      IIRC, that's a measure of the total energy released for the entire duration of the quake, which can be anywhere between seconds and minutes. A meteorite, though, would release all that energy more or less instantaneously.

  34. I live in Penang, Malaysia by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm on an island right next to Sumatra (relatively), and there were huge tsunami's hitting us too. The last I heard 15 people died in the floods. It's not as bad as what people in Sri Lanka and India experienced, but still...

    My mom felt the quake at around 9, I didn't notice anything though. I'm very thankful Malaysia is relatively safe from quakes, but I feel so sorry for all who were affected.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:I live in Penang, Malaysia by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      I have an aunt who lives in Penang. I need to call her and find out if she's okay. :-(

    2. Re:I live in Penang, Malaysia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an aunt who lives in Penang. I need to call her and find out if she's okay. :-(

      Depends on where she lives, but I would say that if she lived in the more densely populated areas, she should be fine. The flood hit the coasts and resorts.

    3. Re:I live in Penang, Malaysia by bwass24 · · Score: 1

      I'been trying to reach a friend in Penang for hours...with no reply.

    4. Re:I live in Penang, Malaysia by roror · · Score: 1

      I am surprised that you still have internet connection and power line working.

    5. Re:I live in Penang, Malaysia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the US has a 3rd world power grid that can cause 1/3 of the nations power to go out when the wrong wires are crossed, doesn't mean the 3rd world has it too.

      Who knows, he may be im a 'remote' area and be using microwave and solar.

    6. Re:I live in Penang, Malaysia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sumatra grows great coffee. Looks like prices will be going up.

  35. Has anyone done a comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...between this earthquake and the possible energy released if that asteroid discovered a few days ago actually hits the earth? It would give some basis of comparison between such events.

  36. Re:I feel for them by nativespeaker · · Score: 1

    Quake devastated my social life my first year of college.

    Ha ha. Hilarious. Now do one about the AIDS epidemic.

  37. From the shores of Chennai India by ashwinds · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I live quiet close to the shore in Besant Nagar- we got off easy - but it was awesome (not as in exciting but leave your mouth open gaping awesome) to see the sea swell up and eat up the shoreline. I was just driving past and saw a boat go up and down about 20-30 feet from the road!! I parked the car, grabbed the camera - but by then the sea had receded - but that was enough to cause serious damage to the hutments close to the sea. We had mild tremor to start the day - barely noticeable at around 6.30 AM - i looked up the internet and found Tibet post of USGS registering a 8.9 quake at Sumatra -looking at the map I thought to myself - all thats in the line between Sumatra and Chennai is the sea (and of course teeny weeny Andaman). Went out for Breakfast and on my return - this. Its unforgettable and cannot be described. Most of India's coast is devastated - I hear Sri Lanka, Maldives etc are pretty bad too. The Quake here was nothing - a mild shake at best - but the Tsunami that followed was something else Apologies for the verbose post - but I am struggling for words to tell what happened.

    1. Re:From the shores of Chennai India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What time exactly did the tsunami hit madras? Seems like early morning. Could have been much worse if it was say at 5 in the evening

    2. Re:From the shores of Chennai India by ashwinds · · Score: 1

      The Tsunami would have peaked at around 9 AM...

    3. Re:From the shores of Chennai India by oneiron · · Score: 1

      Wow... Thanks for the inside peek... I'm in awe just pondering your words. Can't imagine what it was like to see it first-hand.

    4. Re:From the shores of Chennai India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dei Thevdiya paiyallae.Velai vetti illaya

    5. Re:From the shores of Chennai India by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      ashwinds writes:
      The Quake here was nothing...

      You're obviusly a slashdotter...

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    6. Re:From the shores of Chennai India by flynns · · Score: 1

      You're obviusly a slashdotter...

      So're you, kid.

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    7. Re:From the shores of Chennai India by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > (Score:1, Funny)
      > Dei Thevdiya paiyallae.Velai vetti illaya

      Hehe, that's great... uh, what's it mean?

    8. Re:From the shores of Chennai India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      It's a fairly common rebuke in Madras street Tamil (which is to Tamil what Brooklynese is to English). Literally translated, it means "Hey, son of a whore. Don't you have anything [else] to do?"

      Contact nearest Madras Tamil speaker to learn the accent and enunciation. :-) Do NOT contact Singaporeans or Sri Lankans - their Tamil is (in general) so chaste and pure that it puts everyone in Tamil Nadu to shame, especially those in Madras!

  38. Re:How long until we blame America by CrashPoint · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, you're either with us or you're with the tsunamis.

  39. It will be funny soon if... by cloricus · · Score: 1

    ...These quakes don't continue. We had a 8.3 down south of Taz (Australia) a few days ago and it is on the same plate. Got me slightly worried that there will be another bigger one. If not this post will probably be funny in a day or so.

    --
    I ate your fish.
  40. Re:I feel for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AIDS is not an epidemic, it's a cure.

  41. Live Indian News .. by sunsrin · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can watch live Indian News at http://www.ddinews.com. I hope they can handle the Slashdot effect :(

  42. Re:GOD PUNISHING ISLAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Except 80% of Indians are Hindu... and 70% of Sri Lankans are buddhists.

  43. in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    four hundred trillion tons of luggage, mostly candybars and teddy bears, was dumped in the indian ocean today as Delta had a computer malfuncion that rerouted all flights to the region.
    the FAA is looking into the matter of the lost teddybears.

  44. Remember to plug your stuff for every disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it bother you to be so concerned with plugging your site that you shamelessly do it even in the wake of this severe human tragedy?

    But, hey, if it gets you some more hits on your site, then I guess that's ok for you.

    Let's hope your servers don't get flooded.

    1. Re:Remember to plug your stuff for every disaster by sunsrin · · Score: 1

      Excuse me. Its has been my signature from a long time. Do i need to change remove it because a disaster happened?

  45. Re:In.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't modding this as redundant be, in itself, redundant too then?

  46. Re:This is Geek news? by Shag · · Score: 1

    Well, a single natural disaster that manages to affect upward of a half-dozen nations across thousands of miles is pretty darned impressive...

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  47. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Propbably one of those earthquake weapons...
    http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/articl e.asp?ID=138 5

  48. Newsfeed from Bangkok by angkor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My site has been following this story since I first felt the temor in Bangkok this morning: http://2bangkok.com/quakes.shtml#quake

  49. Re:How long until we blame America by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or maybe it's just plate tectonics moving around under our feet. I know it's human nature to think a higher power is standing ready to punish the wicked and reward the good, but when a rock this large cools over billions of years, you have to expect it will jiggle a little.

  50. Re:This is Geek news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    3000 people died in 9/11 and people were outraged. 6000+ people die in Asia and nobody cares?

  51. Re:This is Geek news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all about "Quake"... *runs*

  52. It got reported in a somewhat timely manner by zogger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I heard about it late last night on a net radio feed (my time EST 0 dark thirty am sometime, I was half asleep) right after it happened, but a tsunami wave travelling roughly the speed of a commercial jetliner doesn't give a lot of leeway even if the people in the soon to be affected areas hear about it.

    And this one follows that 8. something quake that hit between tasmania and antarctica just the other day.

    I think this story should be taken into consideration along with the asteroid stories, as this wave was only roughly 40-50 feet high, yet by some reports it traveled up to half a mile inland in some places. Just imagine one ten times higher (something like that) from a large asteroid oceanic strike.

    But ya, you would think that their would be some sort of emergency alert tied to seismographs, that would automatically get posted to various radio and television and internet sources if it was of sufficient strength, ie, danger. I know we have this alleged emergency alert system in the US that will over ride the TV and radio stations OTA broadcasts, but no idea in other nations what they have for that. Civil defense is always lesser funded than military offense in most nations it appears. What would it really cost to develop a radio based alert system for these various nations? Cost of one jet fighter or tank? And it could be tied to cellphones for that matter through the various national carriers, say, in a true natural disaster (impending or otherwise) scenario, your phone might ring with a pre recorded short message.

    I realise in the poorer areas it might be problematic, but surely someone in most areas has a phone or a radio or whatever, you don't have to get the message to every single human directly, just to enough of them in any given area for word of mouth to help out a lot. Wake up and alert one dude per poor village, he can go running outside yelling his head off for that matter, like "dang evac! Tsunami coming! Move it people!" something like that anyway. The old church bells ringing hard and fast deal.

  53. 7000+ dead at 15:30 GMT by Shag · · Score: 1
    According to the Associated Press.

    And if that number isn't big enough, they're saying a million people displaced from their homes.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  54. Re:Stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I intended for this to be biting commentary on what went on in my mind, as my first impression was that the story doesn't belong here. I can see now it heuristically resembles a troll.

    sorry.

  55. Creepy... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative
    ..I saw Phi Phi was hit hard. I've been there, and I understand why. It is shaped like a concave lens with the settlement in the bays on either side. The "ends" of the island are pretty tall with jungle and all, but inbetween, where all the people are it is maybe 2m above sea level. The floodwave sounded big enough that it'd pass straight *across* the island. I expect the cabins we used to rent are leveled to the ground.
    .__
    <..> <-- high ground
    .\/
    .|| <-- people, low ground
    ./\
    <__> <-- high ground

    Dots to avoid anti-ascii art crap :p
    It always feels so much more personal when you've been there. I don't think the odds are any different if you've been in one place or traveling the world, but it is always creepy to know "I've been there. That could have been me there."

    Kjella
    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Creepy... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      It always feels so much more personal when you've been there. I don't think the odds are any different if you've been in one place or traveling the world, but it is always creepy to know "I've been there. That could have been me there."
      Tell me about it. Just heard from a friend that they're fishing boats on top of cars in Langkawi; just spent a relaxing holiday out there last month, and boy, is it scary to imagine the scene. Something about it no longer being a BBC video, for instance, and it being about a real place with real people.
    2. Re:Creepy... by Xenna · · Score: 1

      I've looked it up on a map and it seems like the vulnerable part is somewhat shielded against a wave coming in from the east. Not that it looks anywhere near safe...

      http://perso.inooi.com/v2/fr/th/PhiPhi-map.gif

    3. Re:Creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was there not to long ago too. My sister have friends who are there NOW that she haven't heard from yet... We don't know if they left Phi Phi before this, but they were supposed to spend christmas there, so it seems likely they were still there...

      I was also on Bali close to the bombings there, and visited the world trade center just a few months prior to 9/11. And I was an exchange student in Singapore during the SARS outbreak. And while there I got to know lots of people from all over Indonesia, India, Malaysia and Sri Lanka who are probably home for the winter brake right now. God I hope they are all alright!

      Maybe I should stop travelling...

    4. Re:Creepy... by X86Daddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was snorkeling at Phi Phi just a few weeks ago. And I stayed at the Holiday Inn resort on Patong beach... just a couple blocks from the Zen sushi restaurant in this AP photo. I agree that it is a very odd "I was just there" sensation. Especially since my thoughts while there centered on how it is such a nice and relaxing place to live. My thoughts turn to the boat captains, the receptionists, the nice guard at the hotel, the watresses at the Todai down the street, the metal sculpter I bought a beautiful Alien figure from... Many people I recently interacted with, and no telling if they're still alive. Even if they're okay, they surely have friends and family who aren't.

      These types of events are always very tragic, and with a closer perspective, all too real.

  56. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by hughk · · Score: 1
    Once the earthquake hit with a sea floor epicenter, everyone with a web browser knew a tsunami was going to hit somewhere.
    Why didn't someone in India or Sri Lanka work this one out? It was early morning there and the country isn't predominantly Christian so there should have been people around and services available to warn people via radio/TV.
    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  57. Re:This is Geek news? by geeveees · · Score: 1

    I have excellent karma. Obviously the Internet is not like real life.

    Score:-1, Flamebait

    Time to update your sig...

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
  58. Re:How long until we blame America by CrashPoint · · Score: 1
    1. You're probably just trolling, but what the hell.

    2. The flood happened in the morning ours ofafter Christmas.

    3. It's a safe bet that there are some Christians among the dead.

    4. Any god that would kill thousands of people for worshipping another (or in the case of Muslims, calling him another name) is simply evil.
    4a. Make that evil and stupid, since history shows that you cannot wipe out a religion by murdering its followers.

  59. Re:In.... by ginotech · · Score: 1

    yeah, i agree. more than 7,000 people were killed. have a fucking heart, you insensitive bastard.

  60. Re:How long until we blame America by old_and_gray · · Score: 1

    Wow, you're a geek and a religious zealot. Congratulations!

  61. troll...troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    troll...

  62. Re:How long until we blame America by Dante+Shamest · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I know it is an unpopular view and I will be immediately marked down for saying so, but I believe this is an act of a higher power.

    Yeah. Mother Nature.


    Punishment for non believers and 9/11 I think?

    Please. If you really believe that God's responsible, then you believe in a sick God: He punishes people (including innocent children) via tsunamis just because he doesn't have enough fans? I seriously doubt other Christians would share your view.

  63. You think that's crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    the NYTimes even said it disturbed the rotation of the earth.

  64. are you a sick person? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like a sick person who needs to be cared for in a mental hospital.

    If you really believe in God, then you should know that God loves everyone.

    don't be so sick.

    Please, it pains the rest of us to deal with your diseased consciousness.

    1. Re:are you a sick person? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I don't believe in fairy tales anymore. Your 'god' is a primitive and obsolete concept.

  65. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except of course, that christmas (other than the name) is a pagan festival that predates christianity.

  66. Re:I feel for them by AmericaHater · · Score: 0
    OK

    the AIDS epidemic devastated my social life my first year of college.

  67. Re:And still by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And still, stupid people come in with completely pointless posts that clearly identify them as being mentally retarded.

    Congratulations.

  68. I live in Coastal South India by EqualSlash · · Score: 5, Informative


    I live in Chennai(Madras),(Capital City of the State Tamil Nadu - the region worst affected by the Tsunami in India ). For us, this is the first time ever something like a Tsunami hits our coast. The earthquake itself was not deadly but the tides alone were responsible for the death of more than 1000 people according to some reports. Since this happened early in the morning and the day being a sunday, not many people were awake at that time. In my city alone almost 100 poor fishermen who live in the huts along the seashore were washed away. Coastal regions in the Southern parts of my state where even more affected - a lot many were drowned in the flash floods. The fact that I was sleeping unaware of the whole thing at that time, less than a kilometre away from the sea, sends a shiver down my spine.
    You can find some pictures here.

    1. Re:I live in Coastal South India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now that's scary, to wake up after it's happened and so close.

      just glad you around to tell about it

  69. Maybe 10,000+ dead (0800 PDT) by MtViewGuy · · Score: 0

    According to what I'm seeing on Fox News Channel, the death toll may well exceed 10,000 by a substantial margin because many parts of India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Indonesia have yet to report.

    I am concerned about the US military base on Diego Garcia, since it's pretty much open ocean in a straight line from the island to the earthquake epicenter. =(

    1. Re:Maybe 10,000+ dead (0800 PDT) by fbjon · · Score: 1

      It seems the body count is now somewhere around 8000-9000, but I do think it's going rise quite a bit still, I recall hearing that even the military can't reach their own in the worst hit areas. Communication is basically down. I'm just glad that I live in a seismically "safe" place on the Earth...

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re:Maybe 10,000+ dead (0800 PDT) by rsidd · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      I am concerned about the US military base on Diego Garcia

      Interesting. For me, and most people in the world, a US military base would be absolute bottom on any list of worries. Especially the one at Diego Garcia, given its history. It's been cleansed already of its rightful inhabitants by the leaders of the free world; it would be fitting if the military base got wiped out too.

    3. Re:Maybe 10,000+ dead (0800 PDT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wow, what a newsflash. "British Govt. brutalizes dark-skinned natives." That ranks up there with "Water is Wet!" on the duh! scale. Back on point, perhaps the parent poster had a friend or relative stationed on the island? So he should refrain from feeling worry because you and "most people in the world" don't give a shit? When it comes to one's friends and family, who gives a rats ass what the rest of the world thinks?

    4. Re:Maybe 10,000+ dead (0800 PDT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me, and most people in the world, a US military base would be absolute bottom on any list of worries.

      You've failed to distinguish between policies you find objectionable, and the poor hapless folks who's lot in life is to carry them out. Not everyone has your level of education and "enlightenment" about world politics. Their options in life are limited. For many in the military, service is the only way out of poverty.

      Hoping those people die (as opposed to praying for a change in leadership or policy direction) is troubling. You've failed to connect with people; you've failed to show the compassion that makes you human. Empathy is the most fundamental and redeeming human quality (expressed in all religions generally as 'do unto others...'). You've shown some indication of this ability by noting the loss of the original island inhabitants. Sadly you cannot show this same compasion for the poor, hapless folks who have little choice but to serve in a military that now occupies the island.

      Look into your heart, that you claim is so generous to the unfortunate, and answer the question: Can you really wish another person dead and claim to be a complete, rational human being?

      Wishing that a few barely literate kids for the rural South would die is hideous. Your attitude is as much a part of the problem as George Bush's aggression.

    5. Re:Maybe 10,000+ dead (0800 PDT) by Dave+Walker · · Score: 1

      Asshole. Diego Garcia was one of the first things I thought of as well. I did TWO tours there in the '80's, and was there for the quake of '83. It literally threw me out of my rack in my third floor barracks room. I kissed my ass goodbye that night, for there is NO high ground to move to, and shore patrol was driving around announcing that everyone should move to higher ground and brace for a tidal wave. The only thing that saved us that night was that the earthquake occurred so close to the atoll that the tidal wave didn't have enough distance to form.

    6. Re:Maybe 10,000+ dead (0800 PDT) by Dave+Walker · · Score: 1

      Found this on the foxnews site at http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,142566,00.html / :
      "Pentagon Duty Officer Cheryl Irwin told FOX News that the National Military Command Center has received no reports of any damage to the Diego Garcia Naval Support Facility, off the southern coast of India. The Navy is considering whether and what kind of aid to offer to local governments in the region, said Navy Press Duty Officer Lt. Pauline Pimetel."

  70. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dude, you are fucking nuts. Make a favor to mankind and just shut up, its because people like you that we are heading again to the Dark Ages. People like you spread hate and fear between humans disguised in the form of religion, people like you make war and kill in the name of some kind of god that you never saw or feeled. you represent the worst of mankind

  71. Ao Nang in Thailand? by aluminum+boy · · Score: 1

    Can anybody find any info or posts about Ao Nang in the Krabi province of Thailand? I Googled, but could not find anything. My wife and I were just there a couple of weeks ago before heading back to the states. Pretty scary when you realize that it could have been you or your loved one washed out to sea.

    1. Re:Ao Nang in Thailand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife and I just returned from Ao Nang last night! We missed it by 8 hours!

      Found some posts related to Ao Nang:

      I live in Ao-Nang Krabi [Thailand]. The scene is quite bad here - with upturned boats lying broken and strewn across the street. Many tourists and locals are missing - they were leaving on tours as the wave hit. Army and police are arriving in their masses.
      Rob Bysouth, Krabi, Thailand
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point /4126255.s tm

    2. Re:Ao Nang in Thailand? by aluminum+boy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the post, glad that you both got out okay.

  72. hundreds? try thousands! And still countin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sources are in french my native language but any translation tool should do the job for you.

    Last estimate were at 7000 and still counting, a village in Sri Lanka is totally destroyed, hotel and houses were seen floating atop waves crashing in the land repetitively. This is one of the worst catasrtophy we have seen in several decades.

    Cyberpresse, a leading quebecquers media outlet

    Our public television network take on it

    Earth is getting even, everymonth the amount of such catastrophy happens more and more, earth will win, it always has, we fucked it up, its not happy, if needed it will wipe all of us off of its face, sry for what seems like a religious belief it is not, it is mere observation.

  73. CNN by edittard · · Score: 2, Funny
    Slashdot aint CNN.
    Is it devoid of any original content or in-depth analysis?
    Does it show the same stories over and over and over again?
    Are the adverts intrusive and increasing?

    You may wish to reconsider your statement.

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  74. Low Early, Tasteless Later by DumbSwede · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I saw this in the news last night and the death estimates where ludicrously low. This always seems to be the case for these types of events, while death estimates in Western countries always seem to start on the high side and trend down. I'm not sure why this should be. I understand that some less powerful countries (or more centrally controlled) always want to put the best spin on things, but during disasters it always ends up sounding like a Monty Python's Spanish Inquisition routine. Since this type of news is certain to get out, why delay it? Perhaps it is not purposely delayed in this case, but one certainly sees this happening often in other parts of the world. Granted downed communication networks make getting precise news hard (impossible), but perhaps I have already answered my own question. Maybe it's not so much about owning up to a terrible human tragedy, but an unwillingness of admitting not having the technology and infrastructure to make better estimates.

    I've heard no word in the news about Arthur C. Clark. While thousands are dead, he likely has a sturdy structure to live in, and it would be unlikely statistically he perished. Has as been posted though, he lives on the coast so really stating any odds would be hard. I hope he is alive, but only to the extent I wish anyone life and happiness. He has lived a full life, and should he be gone our concern should be with the living. Ironically should he have perished, it would probably inspire more aid for those left alive.

    Hopefully the now approximately 6000 estimate wont climb much higher, but if the past is any guide expect this to grow at least past 20,000.

    BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen? I can understand this in the case of Attacks and Bombings, since Americans could be the targets. But with thousands dead, the news agencies are scrambling to find out if one or two Americans snuffed it.

    1. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by Rob+Carr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen?

      For some reason, the human mind categorizes things according to how the object is related to the individual. If something is near, it's far more impactful than if something is far away. If you can see it, it has more impact than if you can't. If you are somehow related to the individual, the event makes a greater impression.

      News organizations know this. By focusing on some aspect that relates to their viewers, they're more likely to draw in the viewer's interest.

      Look at the readers of Slashdot. They immediately related to Arthur C. Clarke living in the area. It's how our brains work.

      As far as numbers, on a cognitive level, we all know that 7000 is larger than 3000 is larger than 10. But our brains don't really grasp numbers over 7 too well. We might have a general feel for 100, and there's some indication that the largest natural human groups wind up around 160 or so. Beyond that, we don't connect to the numbers on a primative level. It's just big numbers.

      As a human, it helps if you understand how your brain works, so that you can compensate.

      Me? I like to snorkel. Reading about the scuba divers that probably got wiped out caught my attention. Through those scuba divers, my brain can now emotionally link to the tragedy. Stupid, but it works.

      You think MS Windows is buggy? Look at the home-grown software your brain's running.

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    2. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen?


      It's just you. I've checked videos from around the world and each seems to be focus on the loss of life of their own citizens.

      BTW, have you stopped beating your wife?

    3. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen? I can understand this in the case of Attacks and Bombings, since Americans could be the targets. But with thousands dead, the news agencies are scrambling to find out if one or two Americans snuffed it.

      They are American news channels, they focus on the angle that has the most impact to their viewership. Why does Slashdot focus on Arthur C. Clarke, an author who hasn't written anything on his own in over 30 years? Same reason really, a personal connection of a sort.

    4. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by Deadstick · · Score: 0
      BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen?

      Perhaps you would see it differently if you had a friend or relative traveling in the region.

      rj

    5. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by oneiron · · Score: 1

      BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen?

      It may be poor taste, but the vast majority of barbaric americans (of which I am one) seem to eat it up. Fox and CNN are just giving the viewers what they want so they can get their $$$. The real poor taste comes in with the citizenry and the politicos. It's all the "power of pride" bumper stickers...the "you're with us or you're against us" mentality.

      What they don't realize is that we're all in this together, and the only thing worth being proud of is being alive and human.

      ...and the human part of that only lasts until we find out that we're not alone in the infinity of the cosmos.

    6. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by DrEasy · · Score: 1
      BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen?
      I think the idea is that they're informing people who might have loved ones involved in the disaster.
      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    7. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      I just checked several national news outlets based in other countries and, SUPRISE, they are focusing on the number of citizens of their respective countries that may have been killed.

    8. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      "This always seems to be the case for these types of events, while death estimates in Western countries always seem to start on the high side and trend down."

      Early reports are never accurate, and shouldn't be expected to be. Actually, I've seen reports of disasters in non-Western countries where the first estimates were much higher. Remember the train collision in North Korea a while back?

      "BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen?"

      Well if I have family/friends in the affected area, I want to know if they are ok. Fox and CNN (or at least the versions you are probably watching if you are in the States, I know CNN and NewsCorp have international channels as well) are reporting primarily to American viewers who are more likely to have American family and friends in the area. Its really no more tasteless than you expressing concern over one possible fatality (Clarke) when thousands are probably dead.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    9. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by rsidd · · Score: 1
      I saw this in the news last night and the death estimates where ludicrously low. This always seems to be the case for these types of events, while death estimates in Western countries always seem to start on the high side and trend down. I'm not sure why this should be.

      Because these aren't estimates, but known deaths? No conspiracy here.

    10. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vastly more likely that more Americans are friends or relatives of one of the casualties whose are not American.

      Not that it matters as the news should still focusing on the impact on everyone, not just Americans. Americans, in general, seem to care for themselves first, second, and third, and most could care less that more people that died in the World Trade Center just perished.

    11. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by YE · · Score: 1

      BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen?

      FWIW, it's not just you, and it's not just American media. Bulgarian media are doing the same for the past few hours - ringing up embassies, expats and tour guides of Bulgarian groups in the affected countries, trying to find out if there are Bulgarian casualties.

      Bad taste is universal. As some would say, we all descended from the same ape.

    12. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by Diag · · Score: 1

      Um, it's Christmas, lots of people from all over the world are holidaying in these areas. Worried families at home want to hear this kind of information.

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    13. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Usually I'm not averse to having a crack at Americans but in this instance I think you're being daft - ITV news in the UK is largely speaking to British people and covering the resorts where the Brits are likely to be but that is totally to be expected.

      Obviously Americans are going to be more interested in other Americans caught in the disaster ( friends, families etc on holidays there ) just as Brits are more interested in the fate other Brits and the Irish in the fate of their countrymen.

      At this stage it's not in poor taste at all, later on we will all be more interested in the rebuilding effort and the people who live their but now most people are going to immediately worry about any people they know in those areas.

    14. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by Saeger · · Score: 1

      Indeed - it's our primitive evolutionary psychology in conflict with our exponentially advancing technology that'll probably be our undoing.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    15. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by ntrfug · · Score: 1

      You think MS Windows is buggy? Look at the home-grown software your brain's running.

      That's not a bug; it's a feature!

    16. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen?

      Dutch media do that too (report about Dutch casualties, I mean). I guess that's how the news media work all over the world. I used to think it was slightly inappropriate, but now I think not. They are Dutch media after all, reporting to Dutch viewers. There's nothing wrong with relating the events to Dutch people. After all, people may be watching who have family or friends there. Same goes for American news media.

      It would be inappropriate if the news media somehow gave the impression that Dutch people dying is in any way worse than locals or other nationalities, but I've never noticed that.

    17. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by bogado · · Score: 1

      This is not a "American" thing, I usually read the Brasilian, french and american press and as I can tell all of them did this. While all of them concentraded in the large numbers (arround 150.000 now) they would do side news with local numbers.

      Since this is very far and expensive for Brasilians we had a few casualites, from what I heard there were more germans tourists.

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

  75. Re:This is Geek news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, so what? One was on purpose by a bunch of f'd up muslims. The other a chance geological event (insert god blame here). Would it matter bitching about an earthquake? No. Would it matter instituting an effort eradicate the enemies of my country? Yes. Now you figure out why the coverage is so different.

  76. Re:Oh, STFU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Until 3 years ago the nation that gave most was Japan. They've cut back in the last few years though, and the US has given a lot of money recently to Pakistan, even though it has been selling its nuclear secrets to terrorists.

    The country giving the largest proportion of aid per unit income is Norway, which gives about 6 times as much as the US per unit income.

    I found some stats here if you're interested

  77. Earlier earthquake of 8.1 by Devar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is interesting is that there was another quake on the 24th of 8.1 off the coast of Tasmania, the other side of the continential plate that caused this one ( AFAIK). That end of the plate gave way and that affected this one? A warning? I don't know, but it might have been related.


    Massive earthquake felt in Tasmania
    December 24, 2004 - 7:55AM

    The world's biggest earthquake in almost four years has struck 800 km
    off the coast of Tasmania, Australian seismological officials said.

    Geoscience Australia said the quake, measuring 8.1 on the Richter Scale
    hit the Macquarie Rise, in the Pacific Ocean, at 1.59am. [...]

    --
    It's a Bagel.
    1. Re:Earlier earthquake of 8.1 by IroygbivU · · Score: 1
      Speaking about patterns and earthquakes, it's an interesting coincidence that the Sumatra earthquake occured almost exactly one year and one hour apart from the last earthquake that involved major loss of life, at Bam (Iran) last boxing day.

      Sumatra:
      12,000+ deaths (and rising).
      Sunday, December 26, 2004 at 00:58:50 (UTC) - Coordinated Universal Time
      http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqinthenews/2004/usslav /

      Bam:
      Approx 31,000 deaths.
      Friday, December 26, 2003 at 01:56:52 (UTC) - Coordinated Universal Time
      http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2003/eq_031226/

  78. Hi. by roks · · Score: 0, Redundant
    1. Re:Hi. by roks · · Score: 0, Troll

      and there is more to come.

    2. Re:Hi. by Shag · · Score: 1

      I eagerly wait for the "more to come" part that explains how 2004-12-26 is the same as 2005-01-01. I'm sure that it's something simple, like the difference between calendars in use at different points in history. Or the 6-day difference between your time-space continuum/multiverse and the one the rest of us live in.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    3. Re:Hi. by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      Surely you realize that link means nothing, yes?

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    4. Re:Hi. by roks · · Score: 0

      The odds are 18/1500 that such a massive quake would hit +/- 9 days from 01/01/05.

    5. Re:Hi. by roks · · Score: 0

      Ohh. Your "eagerness" will be probably satisfied very soon. Odds are very high.

  79. Re:Oh, STFU by deesine · · Score: 0

    Agreed.

    I wonder how many Ameri-bashers realize the amount of government and non-government aid the US donates. Government aid figures are easy to find. Non-government aid isn't that hard to find for the US, but apparently no other nation tracks those figures. BTW, non-government aid from the US was about 243 billion dollars last year.

    --
    damaged by dogma
  80. I can't believe the prejudice here by postbigbang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is an astounding loss of life, and a healthy fraction of the posts are just evil. If this is what slashdot has come to, prejudice, intolerance and ill-will for those that have suffered, I'm outta here. These are your brethren. Mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, uncles and aunts that have been hit by an unannounced, unpreventable, and unknowable tragedy. I'm appalled.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So have you only just realized that so many Americans regard the rest of the world as scum? Why else did you think there was do much ill-will towards Americans in the rest of the world?

    2. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by bhima · · Score: 1

      All I can say is: Welcome to Slashdot

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    3. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about?

      1. I have no family or friends in that part of the world so no they are not my brethren.

      2. 6000 dead is not an astounding loss of life.

      3. This is a tech news site not CNN.com. Does this event increase the price of RAM? If not then it does not belong here.

    4. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What a totally stupid, biased and ignorant remark. You're probably an astroturfing terrorist.

      "So many Americans" have given their lives to rescue many parts of the rest of the world from dictatorships in places like Afghanistan and Iraq. Where were you and where was your country when the Taliban were shooting women in the head on just the accusation of adultry, and Saddam Husein was killing hundreds of thousands just for sport? Perhaps you are from France, Germany or Russia, countries that were reaping big $PROFITS trading military hardware to Iraq for oil? Or, perhaps you are a Radical Islamic teaching your young to tie bombs to themselves and blow up innoocent civilians because you are too much of a coward to do it yourselves? What do you tell them, that Allah will be grateful and will give them 72 virgins in paradise?

      Did you dig the graves for the bodies of the Americans who lost their lives in WWI fighting to free you, or are you the one defacing the graves of Americans buried in France because they rescued your mother and father from a life under Hitler's rule?

      With the $Billions spent on the Marshall Plan in Europe following WWII the US has contributed $Trillions to the rebuilding of countries around the world. Americans have freely redistributed more of our wealth around the world than the collective contributions of all the Socialist/Marxist countries combined. The major export of those nations has been guns, bombs, violence and "revolution", and everywhere they've succeeded the result is a people even more oppressed than before.

      How much money did you or your country give to the rebuilding of Europe and Japan after WWII? Did your country start a Peace Corp? Have you been sending Billions of tons of Care Packages packages around the world over the last 50 years?

      Maybe you're a self-rightous Canadian who is vitriolic about American military power but enjoys letting America pay its military protection bill? Canada has a total of only 55,000 serving in all of their armed forces combined and they depend on the protection of America's military might.

      But, maybe you're right. What if, from now on, we keep to ourselves, and when you flirt with tyranny again we won't come to your rescue after you take the dicator's bait? What if we dig up our sacred dead from around the world and bring them home to rest in peace and respect here? Besides the Marshall Plan, the Peace Corp and Care Packages, we have redistributed more of our wealth via job outsourcing than any other country in the world. Everything we buy here is made somewhere else by folks who are earning 10X more than they did before. Ninty percent of all programming jobs in the USA have been shipped overseas since 2000. Americans standard of living has dropped in direct proportion to its rise elsewhere around the globe.
      We even let foreign Billionaires buy citizenship and then setup websites here using disgruntled Leftists/Marxists in an attempt to influence our Presidential elections!

      What if we stop outsourcing our manufacturing, programming and other jobs and stop all HB1 and other job imports, canceled free donations of food, clothing, medical supllies and money? Would that be treating othes with more respect?

    5. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by halr9000 · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I browse at +3 for this reason.

    6. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by wk633 · · Score: 1

      But a couple of thousand in two towers is?

    7. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Gatton · · Score: 1

      What are you browsing at? I read at +2 and very few posts have been insensitive. If you're reading at 1 or 0 I am sure the number of f*cktards is far higher.

    8. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask not for who the bell tolls it tolls for you.?

      Who exactly are your brethren bubba?

      OK what is interesting about slash dot is that it gives a view on news which is informed by science and rationality. I turn to slash dot not for the ram price index but rather for informed observation.

    9. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither can I, my God, what has mankiind reduced itself to?

    10. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone dies someday. Their time will come, and so will yours and mine. Death is natural, and fearsome. We create entire belief systems, oftentimes nations, just to deal with the horror of impending oblivion.

      It is not prejudice to dismiss or make less of human deaths which occur outside of our six degrees; it is a part and parcel of human conceptualization and rationalization. We have evolved to act this way for a reason. Do you really believe you have taken the time and consideration to mourn with full emotion for each and every person who died in the quake this day? Of course you have not; you could not survive such grief, you would be wrecked psychologically. Every reader here has minimized the importance of this event to some degree, because conceptualization is our coping mechanism for integrating the infinite array of perceptions into our limited perceptual framework.

      In summary, do not throw stones from within glass houses. We are all in glass houses here.

    11. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by analog_line · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the planet Earth. Many people on this planet are happy the the twin towers were brought down. We are not a species that is nice by nature. To paraphrase the Princess Bride, anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something.

    12. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty insightful post for an AC. You are correct - I don't think it justifies flagrant insensitivity and meanness, but experiencing the full grief of the death and misery that afflicts the human race would of course destroy a person's psyche.

      So we do our best - when a newsworthy event happens that is associated with mass death and destruction we should pause, give a moment of respect and sadness for the people affected and try to move on with our lives because we don't have much other choice. Yes, humans have evolved to be tribalist, to care first and foremost about those we are in some way connected to, those we live near, work with, talk to, and interact with and their loved ones. Let's not try to overly rationalize emotional experiences, they don't always fit into a neat logical framework.

      But we could at least show a modicum of respect (and the vast majority of posts in this story do, it's just a few trolls and dickheads who are being actively nasty).

    13. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you.

      Were you here on 9/11 to read all the posts about how great it was that 3000 americans were killed?

      Fuck those ragheads. They wanted a world where it's us vs them. They got it.

    14. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by justins · · Score: 1
      Yes, it's a tragedy, but I suspect a large portion of the world didn't give a rats ass about the 2000 who died in the Twin Towers either, so turn about is fair play.

      It's only "fair" if you think ethics is entirely subjective, which is sad.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    15. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by justins · · Score: 1
      Where were you and where was your country when the Taliban were shooting women in the head on just the accusation of adultry, and Saddam Husein was killing hundreds of thousands just for sport?

      Where was the United States, for that matter? If the Taliban weren't dumb enough to host Bin Laden's little brigade, they'd still be engaging in the human rights abuses that have you so outraged.

      I'm sure Iraqis are glad Saudi Arabians blew up the WTC so we could fight the evil of Saddam Hussein. I'm sure they're glad we waited for that, rather than supporting their previous attempts at revolution and overthrowing him themselves. That wouldn't have made any sense.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    16. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      I'm browsing at +1 and I haven't seen anything nasty yet. But I'm coming to this late (after a lot of moderation has been done) and I always browse sorted by score.

    17. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where were you when the CIA was training the Taleban and "Islamist extremists", supplying them with guns and rocket launchers, and teaching them how to make car bombs?

    18. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if we didn't, you'd whine that we didn't do anything to prevent the Soviets from taking over

    19. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were there for Kosovo.

      We were there for WWII.

      We are there for Iraq.

      You are souless.

    20. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... these are the people to whom our jobs have been oursourced.

    21. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      User ID #761081 says: I'm outta here...

      After a long stay, eh?

    22. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by bulliver · · Score: 1

      Fuck you you pompous asshole. I *am* a Canadian. Just what or who have you protected us from? I think if you look at the history the last attack on Canadian soil was by *Americans* for fucks sake.

      Here's a news flash: we don't want your fuckin help, Canada has build a great reputation as being a friend to the entire world. Again, who exactly have you protected us from? BTW, Canada was in WW2 from pretty much the begining...America didn't declare war until after Pearl Harbour. I consider Americans great friends to Canada (that is American people, not your fucked up government) but people like you and your ignorant attitude is exactly why Canadians (and others in the world) can't fucking stand you.

      If it's not clear yet...we don't want your help, go fuck yourself)

      Disclaimer before I get flamed: This post is directed against the anonymous coward above...not the american people as a whole.

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
    23. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by thisgooroo · · Score: 1
      Where were you and where was your country when the Taliban were shooting women in the head on just the accusation of adultry, and Saddam Husein was killing hundreds of thousands just for sport?

      most likely he was not there supporting saddam as the americans did when he was attacking iran and gassing kurds at the same time

    24. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      It's not an American thing. Most of the world thinks everyone else is scum! Including those in your country, whichever one it is.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    25. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by bljohnson0 · · Score: 1

      "we don't want your fuckin help, Canada has build a great reputation as being a friend to the entire world"

      Sure - you don't think you need it now. But when the shit hits the fan guess who you'll be calling. If you're such a friend to the entire world then why would you need a military at all!? You could just "Eh?" and "Aboot" your way out of conflict.

      "BTW, Canada was in WW2 from pretty much the begining"

      The war went from 1939 to 1945. From 1939 to 1941 the Canadians sent troops over to England to train and prepare for an invasion by Germany. Their first major contact with the enemy was in Hong Kong against the Japenese where they received a major ass pounding.

      Guess what date that was? The US officially entered the war on December 8th, 1941 (a day after Pearl Harbor). Guess what day the Japanese attaked the Kai Tak airport in Hong Kong where the Canadians first got into the action? December 8th, 1941.

      So shut your damned hole.

      The Canadian army didnt do shit until the US entered the war. Then AFTER that they only provided support to the allies. Case in point.. Sicily.. the US and British closed in from the west and north.. the Canadians were sent in to clean out the Germans who were fleeing from them. Then the Canadian army withdrew their troops into reserve while the Americans and British entered Sicily and took it back from the Germans.

      So anyways.. then in 1945 the allies are preparing for a full scale assault in the Pacific.. and I quote from the Veterans Association Canada:

      "Canada, too, prepared for the assault. Nearly 80,000 Canadians volunteered to join the Pacific forces and began concentrating at nine stations across Canada in July 1945. Canadian naval participation was also to have been impressive: 60 ships, manned by 13,500 men. However, the war was over before this help was needed. President Truman of the United States had made the fateful decision to use the atomic bomb."

      Bang. End of war. So get your damned facts straight. Repeat after me... "Thank you America!"

      So all you anti-American slashdotters.. flame away. I dont want to sound like I'm belittling the efforts of Canadians in WW2. It was a combined effort by all the Allies.. but dont get on your high and mighty horse putting down the US as a whole just because you dont agree with the decisions of the present-day US government. There are many Americans who may not agree with them... but damnit.. our soldiers are there dying to try and keep a little peace and give the Iraqis (and others) a little taste of freedom. They deserve some support and respect.

    26. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by bulliver · · Score: 1

      First of all, I apologize for the bad language. The poster I responded to was particularily condecending and arrogant. He pissed me off.

      Second, thanks for the history lesson

      But when the shit hits the fan guess who you'll be calling.

      What shit? What fan? Again, mention a single attack on Canada that you have saved us from and I will concede this entire debate. And btw, there is little point in mentioning what might happen in the future. It hasn't happened, no one knows what will happen, so mentioning it here is pointless. Besides, unless our government does a complete about face as starts acting as pompous, arrogant, and imperialistic as yours, we have little to fear of a foreign attack.

      The war went from 1939 to 1945. From 1939 to 1941 the Canadians sent troops over to England to train and prepare for an invasion by Germany.

      So why exactly do you consider what I wrote wrong? Whether involved in actual combat or not, Canada was commited to the effort from the beginning, whilst the American people were sitting at home mad at Roosevelt(sp?) because they didn't want to send their boys over to Europe to fight a war that 'wasn't their problem'. No matter how you spin it, Canada was in from the beginning, and the US didn't get involved until it affected them directly.

      You could just "Eh?" and "Aboot" your way out of conflict.

      That's right we all sit up here saying eh and aboot. That's all we fuckin do. It is the tendancy for someone with no real ability to create an intelligent rebuttal to start with the childish name calling. Way to live up to that stereotype, you do America proud.

      Repeat after me... "Thank you America!"

      Repeat after me: 'thanks but no thanks'. I cannot imagine the kind of arrogance that would lead to your statement, and is exactly why I responded to that first post (was that you?). I will be first in line to thanks the Americans if and when they start treating us as a brother and an equal, instead of a stupid, defensless kid next door that needs your help to stay alive.

      but dont get on your high and mighty horse putting down the US as a whole just because you dont agree with the decisions of the present-day US government.

      Here you just completely ignore what I wrote in order to bolster your argument. Read the disclaimer at the bottom of my post. It was directed at *that single person*, not the "US as a whole".

      but damnit.. our soldiers are there dying to try and keep a little peace and give the Iraqis (and others) a little taste of freedom. They deserve some support and respect.

      Indeed they do, but see the soldiers are actually doing something, instead of sitting smugly at home telling people that they owe the US a huge load of debt for their existance.

      It is this smug attitude that pisses off the rest of the world so much. True story: My best friend is an American, born in San Fran, he moved up to Canada at the age of 13. We have great fun debating about political issues, and something that he always tends to come back to is that "America is the best country because we could kick anyone's ass". I ask him, "why does that make you better" and he just goes in circles, "because we have the best Military in the world". Granted, the Americans could kick anyones's ass, but it is this attitude of the American people that Military might makes them "the best" that disgusts so many other people. Maybe the American scale of what makes a country better than another is military might...but not Canada's, and not any other Country in this world. Until the American people can take a step back and realize how arrogant this attitude is, the rest of the world will never respect you (and indeed some will hate you).

      I'm going to say this one more time, so it is perfectly clear to you...I am not anti-American...I am anti-asshole

      Good day sir.

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
    27. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter how you spin it, Canada was in from the beginning, and the US didn't get involved until it affected them directly.
      I wouldnt necessarily call shipping over a few divisions as really "in from the beginning."

      That's right we all sit up here saying eh and aboot. That's all we fuckin do. It is the tendancy for someone with no real ability to create an intelligent rebuttal to start with the childish name calling. Way to live up to that stereotype, you do America proud.
      That was meant as a joke. Settle down. And my response was an intelligent rebuttal.. with joke about Canadians thrown in.

      Repeat after me: 'thanks but no thanks'. I cannot imagine the kind of arrogance that would lead to your statement, and is exactly why I responded to that first post (was that you?).
      No it wasnt me.. and I'm not saying I agree with the original posters view (completely). What lead to my statement was that we provided a quick end to the war.. thats all.

      Here you just completely ignore what I wrote in order to bolster your argument. Read the disclaimer at the bottom of my post. It was directed at *that single person*, not the "US as a whole".
      I read your disclaimer.. maybe next time instead of directing your comments to America you should have directed them to the original poster in the comment itself instead of mentioning that in a little disclaimer at the end. I.e. "we don't want your fuckin help," and "who exactly have you protected us from." I'm pretty sure you didnt mean that one dude.

      Indeed they do, but see the soldiers are actually doing something, instead of sitting smugly at home telling people that they owe the US a huge load of debt for their existance.
      True - but you also cant sit smugly in your Canadian home up there acting as though you need NO help from the United States and your life would be just as peaceful (or moreso) and great if we didnt even exist.

      I'm going to say this one more time, so it is perfectly clear to you...I am not anti-American...I am anti-asshole
      Who isn't anti-asshole? Well.. except for other assholes.

      I just think the original poster does have some good points.. he just made them a bit strong. I just dont agree with you jumping all over his ass as though you yourself speak for the Canadian government. Canada needs us... and I dont mean just our military. In 1996 the US exported over $6.1 billion in agricultural goods alone to Canada. I'm sure in 2004 that figure is much higher.

      So dont sit there implying that Canada rules and we suck because we're all just a bunch of fat lazy American assholes. Suuurreee... you put some little disclaimer at the bottom.. but its pretty obvious your comments were meant for more than just that one Anonymous Coward.

    28. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by bljohnson0 · · Score: 1

      Ooops - wasnt logged in. The above comment was obviously posted by me. And again let me make sure I make it completely clear.. no I was NOT the original AC that posted this comment. I do not share his strong views that the US is above everyone else and all other countries should be kissing our asses :)

    29. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by bulliver · · Score: 1

      Ok, one more post then hopefully we can put this to bed...

      That was meant as a joke. Settle down. And my response was an intelligent rebuttal.. with joke about Canadians thrown in.

      Can you do me a favour, if it is a joke put in a smiley :) as it is very difficult to tell it was a joke from your written words. I took it as a direct insult. I watch enough American TV to realize that Canadians are frequently the butt of American jokes: Homer Simpson calling Canada "America Junior", Canadian cars having square wheels on South Park. I also have enough good sense to take this good natured ribbing and laugh at it...but in the written word it is difficult to tell the intentions of the writer.

      ..and yes your response was intelligent. Just alittle name calling of my own there...sorry.

      "we don't want your fuckin help," and "who exactly have you protected us from." I'm pretty sure you didnt mean that one dude.

      I guess this is my fault too... I was responding to the 'attitude' of the OP and people who hold that attitude...thus my use of words that imply a response to multiple people. I did not mean to include all Americans at all, and if that is how you (or anybody else) read it, I am truly sorry.

      True - but you also cant sit smugly in your Canadian home up there acting as though you need NO help from the United States and your life would be just as peaceful (or moreso) and great if we didnt even exist.

      To this point I am afraid I cannot concede. Corelation does not imply causality. Sure we haven't been attacked by anyone in all the years that you have been our neighbor..but you indirectly (and the OP directly) seem to be saying this is because you have been protecting us. Perhaps it's because we are a well respected nation that has no direct enemies? Let me tell you something, and while I don't speak for all Canadians, I know many who share this belief...we are much more scared of reprisal from your government for not adopting "the American way" then we are of an attack from another foriegn nation. I am not saying we would be better if you didn't exist...I'm saying we would be just fine without your help.

      I just dont agree with you jumping all over his ass as though you yourself speak for the Canadian government. Canada needs us...and I dont mean just our military. In 1996 the US exported over $6.1 billion in agricultural goods alone to Canada. I'm sure in 2004 that figure is much higher.

      I do not speak for my government...in fact I think a great many things my government does are completely stupid. I don't think this changes no matter who your government is. Your point about economic trade is valid, but remember it goes both ways. I have three words for you..softwood lumber tariffs. Why do we have a free-trade agreement when America imposes arbitrary tariffs on Canadian goods imported to the US. Point of fact there are many *Americans* upset about this (mostly general contracters) because they now have to use inferior products or pay extra for the good Canadian stuff. Unfortunatly I cannot provide backup on this point...as It was in a news documentary I saw on TV a while back.

      So dont sit there implying that Canada rules and we suck because we're all just a bunch of fat lazy American assholes. Suuurreee... you put some little disclaimer at the bottom.. but its pretty obvious your comments were meant for more than just that one Anonymous Coward.

      I don't think I called Americans fat and lazy, I don't even think I implied it, assholes though...sure :) see, this is a joke

      There are a number of Americans I respect very highly... Ben Franklin, Thomas Edison, and Henry David Thoureau immediately come to mind, though there are many more. As for who my comments are directed at...see above. They are directed at people who hold an attitude. If you hold a more modest view about the US and the US's role in this world then they are not directed at you... (you doesn't mean *you*, it

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
    30. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by bljohnson0 · · Score: 1

      Can you do me a favour, if it is a joke put in a smiley :)
      Oops - probably should have included that ;)

      I did not mean to include all Americans at all, and if that is how you (or anybody else) read it, I am truly sorry.
      Great - some people tend to share a common view for all Americans.

      To this point I am afraid I cannot concede. Corelation does not imply causality. Sure we haven't been attacked by anyone in all the years that you have been our neighbor..but you indirectly (and the OP directly) seem to be saying this is because you have been protecting us.
      OK I suppose I can agree with that. There's been no need for the US to have to step up and help Canada with any military issues.

      Your point about economic trade is valid, but remember it goes both ways. I have three words for you..softwood lumber tariffs.
      True - I guess I should have also included a Canadian import example.

      I don't think I called Americans fat and lazy, I don't even think I implied it
      OK I suppose I inaccurately included you in a large portion of non-US (and some US) individuals who think we're all fat and lazy :)

      I don't think we will ever see eye to eye on this, so we must do the rational thing and agree to disagree.
      Agreed :) Although I think I can understand your viewpoint a little better after a rational exchange of ideas (not to say you were being irrational btw.. but the original AC's post seemed a little irrational).

      BTW I am sorry your post got modded down. It certainly didn't deserve it any more than mine did...
      It got modded down!? You bastard!!! :) See a joke! Actually I didnt notice that it was modded down. I show a flat score of 1.. so no biggie.

      Happy Holidays, OK?
      Happy Holidays!

    31. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by bulliver · · Score: 1
      It got modded down!? You bastard!!! :) See a joke! Actually I didnt notice that it was modded down. I show a flat score of 1.. so no biggie.

      Ah, well I was talking about your AC post because you forgot to log in, or do AC posts automatically start at 0?

      Hey, I just thought of something...I think our exchange here is the first time ever on slashdot that a massive flamefest turned into a rational discussion rather than the other way around. We're a shining example to the rest of the world :)

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
  81. Re:This is Geek news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the news here are supposed to be stuff that matters. This matters.

    But you are dropping context in order to amp up the emotionalism for your post. Do you really feel that an NES Overclocking Guide is news that matters? It's news that matters to nerds specifically - which this isn't.

    About 6,000 people are dying every week in the war in Congo, where are the posts about that? Twice that die weekly in Sudan of starvation, where are the news articles? I'm sure you quickly see the problem: the world is full of disasters happening constantly. There is never any moment in time when thousands of people's lives are not ending in some tragic way.

    If you remove the "News for nerds" standard and "Stuff that matters" becomes the only criterion then why quote reuters in the first place? Slashdot should be reuters in that case.

    As the "fifth largest in a century," this isn't world-shaking news (so to speak) and not impactful of most geeks. Had this article not been posted, how many geeks would even find out about it in their normal daily course of action?

  82. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I know it is an unpopular view


    Sure you do, and you're not a Christian, either.

    You just can't resist an opportunity to generate more anti-Christian hate.

    One question: are you "Punk Eek" or a true Darwinian?

  83. I thought for a second... by joseph+schmo · · Score: 0, Troll


    Quake and Tsunami Devastate South Asia

    I thought for a second that Tsunami was another video game and that all the young people of South Asia had become horribly addicted, thereby forcing the local economies to collapse...

    1. Re:I thought for a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not funny

  84. Running total?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Am I the only one who finds these death countings insensitive and dastardly? It sounds like you folks are keeping score in some video game, 7000, 8500, 11500! Yeah High score! ... Let's just say thousands have died and millions affected and get to the task of fixing things up again.

    And no, I don't buy that "every life counts" BS. Of course every life counts, whether it's the first one affected by this or the last. But IMO, this running total has quite the opposite effect, it dehumanizes the event into a mere sensationalized news item.

    1. Re:Running total?? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      No, it helps people grasp what is happening and larger numbers of dead people result in larger responses by 1st world goverments.

      It may not be 'right' but that is the way things work.

    2. Re:Running total?? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      That's true, but people also want information about how big it was, and in this case it was big, meaning a lot of people around the world will wonder about friends&relatives in the region. if it's a "normal" quake, with only a few deaths and some injuries, it's nothing for me to even think about seriously. But when the nbumbers jump from 600 to 3000, to 7000, and still going, there's suddenly a very real possibility that the people I personally know who live there might be affected. Not to mention if you actually live in the region itself (local news).

      If you don't know anyone there however, the numbers might still be meaningless, at least in the grand scale of things. Therefore it becomes like a high score, where every new and higher number comes with an increased 'wow' factor, like the ever-incresingly-catastrophic catastrophe movies.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  85. Aussie earthquake: tsunami? by tehanu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm curious as to why a similar magnitude earthquake, also in the ocean, occurring off the coast of Australia shortly before this earthquake didn't cause a tsunami as well?

    News about this earthquake here: http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,11 778537%255E3462,00.html

    Not that I'm complaining, mind you, but I'm curious as to what the differentiating factor is between these two earthquakes which means one creates a tsunami and the other doesn't.

    1. Re:Aussie earthquake: tsunami? by Weird+O'Puns · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's explanied here: http://www.news24.com/News24/AnanziArticle/0,6935, 2-13-1443_1639881,00.html.

      Quote from the article:

      Seismologist Cvetan Sinadinovski said it caused buildings to shake in the island state for up to 15 seconds, but did not cause a tsunami or unusual tidal activity because it was of horizontal rather than vertical displacement and struck far off the coast.
    2. Re:Aussie earthquake: tsunami? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      An earthquake along a subduction (upthrust) fault is more likely to generate a devastating Tsunami than one from a lateral fault line (the Andaman fault is a subduction fault).

    3. Re:Aussie earthquake: tsunami? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      a quake near land does not cause Tsunami because the water is to shallow.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Aussie earthquake: tsunami? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Also, the USGS report stated that a tsunami was possible in the open ocean, but based on previous earthquake data would probably not hit land anywhere . So even if there had been a vertical displacement, any tsunami would probably have gone unnoticed.

    5. Re:Aussie earthquake: tsunami? by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 1
      I'm curious as to why a similar magnitude earthquake, also in the ocean, occurring off the coast of Australia shortly before this earthquake didn't cause a tsunami as well?
      • The epicenter of the quake happens to be where several plates meet, thus the vertical movement and the high scale.
      • Indonesia, which the epicenter is located is part of "ring of fire", a line of volcanoes that stretches from Asia, all the way to Mount St. Helens down to the South Americas
      • AFAIK, as the tsunami moves into shallow waters, the height increases as the speed decreases.. a recipe for deathly trouble for people living on shores.. Imagine a wall of water 100+ feet high chasing you up inland..
    6. Re:Aussie earthquake: tsunami? by jrumney · · Score: 1
      a quake near land does not cause Tsunami because the water is to shallow

      The "Aussie" earthquake was not near land. It was 800km South of from Tasmania, the nearest landmasses were Auckland Island, Macquery Island, and the South of New Zealand, all 4-500km away.

    7. Re:Aussie earthquake: tsunami? by Magickcat · · Score: 1

      I'm from Melbourne, Australia (just above the island of Tasmania for those who don't know).

      We noticed that our dog and our friend's dogs were acting very strangely for the last couple of days. They've been very anxious and agressive which is very unusual for their breeds. Perhaps they sensed something.

      --

      Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

  86. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Mostly coz I doubt anyone was expecting a tsunami. Out there on the Coramandal Coast, we're more on the look-out for cyclones and such; this, apparently, came in within very quickly, within 30 min or so I believe. I'm told the quake was broadcast live on Indian news channels; there was at least one news channel which was filming its bulletin from its studio in Chennai - the cam shaked and there was some chaos while the bullein was being broadcast.

    Indeed, the last tsunami we had was in 1977, which came with a cyclone; my grandpa was involved in some heroics [which he loves to narrate whenever we go to his place in rural India ;-) ]. I don't know if this is how it is in, say, Hawaii or someplace, but the morning that tsunami hit the coast, everyone apparently went to work normally. It was only by 10AM or so that word spread that the sea was coming in (to use a vernacular phrase for 'tidal wave') and by then, all they could do was to climb onto rooftops and wait for the waters to recede.

  87. Re:And still by schwit1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Cigarettes don't kill, people kill. It's your own fault if you treat your body like a sewer.

  88. I am glad that you are ok. by adolfojp · · Score: 1

    I send my regards and sympathies to your people. Lets pray for a quick recuperation of the area. Its good to read from fellow slashdotters that survived this catastrophe.

    Cheers,
    Adolfo

  89. Yes, the Earth's rotation was affected! by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

    The quake was so powerful the shockwaves circled the planet.

    "All the planet is vibrating" from the quake, said Enzo Boschi, the head of Italy's National Geophysics Institute. Speaking on SKY TG24 TV, Boschi said the quake even disturbed the Earth's rotation."

    Source

    1. Re:Yes, the Earth's rotation was affected! by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

      But HOW did it affect the rotation?

      Is it now longer? Shorter? Does the sun rise ealier or later? HOW?!??!?

      I hate it when something like that is mentioned in passing without any detail whatsoever.

    2. Re:Yes, the Earth's rotation was affected! by apanap · · Score: 1

      I agree... Technically you affect earths rotation every time you move (you change your momentum - and totally it stays the same, so you take it from/leave it to earth), so just saying it affected earth's rotation tells me nothing.

      --
      Give me a job. Please?
    3. Re:Yes, the Earth's rotation was affected! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf, if the guys couldnt prevent the earthquake/tsunami because that region of the planet wasnt beeing monitored the same way pacific is how in the world do you want they measure this kind of magnitude questions precissely?

      Stop fundraising money to study mars and put some effort studying our planet!

    4. Re:Yes, the Earth's rotation was affected! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf are you trying to say?

  90. Re:This is Geek news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless this raises the price of RAM I don't see how or why it matters.

  91. Re:How long until we blame America by Rakishi · · Score: 1

    So much for the loving god, eh? I guess you should become Jewish since it's the Old Testament which had the vengeful god, and Jesus supposedly changed that. So it seems you don't believe in your own religion.

  92. I'd rather be informed directly by DumbSwede · · Score: 1
    If I were a friend or relative I wouldn't want to find out by FOX or CNN news. My original post wasn't about ignoring American casualties, it's about ghoulishly focusing on them to the exclusion of the larger tragedy. I've seen no (confirmed) reports of any Americans dead (yet), but lots of speculation from the news sources on the possibility.

  93. Re:How long until we blame America by CrashPoint · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A few. We call them Protestants.

  94. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure you do, and you're not a Christian, either.

    You just can't resist an opportunity to generate more anti-Christian hate.

    One question: are you "Punk Eek" or a true Darwinian?


    Your paranoia is getting the better of you.

  95. first person's view by adeydas · · Score: 1

    i am from one of the places where the earthquake has reportedly hit. however, i guess it was too mild 'coz we didn't feel a thing here... thanl God.

  96. Wildlife by WolfgangVonEstevez · · Score: 0

    Just a reminder that humans aren't the only victims here. In natural disasters such as this one, the most helpless victims are overlooked. My personal favorite charity is the Save the Tiger Fund, or find one for yourself to help support.

  97. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard about it right away. some one mentioned it in IRC. freenode #linux

  98. Why they use high estimates vs low by draziw · · Score: 1

    Why it is good to start with high estimate: Gets world wide resources. Sets how many people, and how much in the way of funds will be on their way for aid.

    Why it is good to start with low estimate: (normally a bad idea), may keep moral up in areas that don't see how bad things are.

    Ryan

  99. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a Hindu of your zeal has a holy text comparable to yours, this would be seen by them as evidence supporting the existence of their equivalent of the devil -- Showing the importance of maintaining belief as a means of resistance in a time of turmoil.

    Your beliefs lead a lot open to interpretation. I hope you'll have some some perspective and perhaps we'll have seen the last of this crap some day.

  100. Re:Oh, STFU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blinded by patriotism?

    "USA's aid, in terms of percentage of their GNP is already lowest of any industrialized nation in the world, though paradoxically in the last three years, their dollar amount has been the highest."

    http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Debt/US Aid.asp#Almostallrichnationsfailthisobligation

  101. Re:This is Geek news? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

    My point was merely that I come to /. for geek news, which these days they have very little of.

    I go to CNN, FoxNews, WSJ, or the drudge for all other news.

    Tsunamis aren't news for nerds.

    --
    Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
  102. Its ok, do what you want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it very distasteful.

    Should I stop telling you what a publicity monger you are just because I call you on your shamelessness?

    1. Re:Its ok, do what you want. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Should I stop telling you what a publicity monger you are just because I call you on your shamelessness?

      Oh, so helping others when they don't need it is charity. When they DO need it, it's shameless. Fucking trolls... at least TRY to make a little bit of sense from time to time.

  103. usgs link by plopez · · Score: 1

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsww/Quakes/quak es_big.html

    Lots of information on global earthquakes. Looks like lots of strong after shocks in the region.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  104. Nature's way... by froschmann · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, I guess this is mother nature's answer to outsourcing... Seriously though, this was really bad timing. There were probably tons of people in beach resorts who were on holiday.

    1. Re:Nature's way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so apart from being an insensitive cunt what else do you do?

  105. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by northcat · · Score: 1

    Once the earthquake hit with a sea floor epicenter, everyone with a web browser knew a tsunami was going to hit somewhere.

    Are you sure? Because I read somewhere that only vertical movement in the ocean causes tsunamis, that not all quakes in the ocean cause tsunamis. But, not sure about this...

  106. Re:And still by Vasan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The difference is that those people chose to smoke.

  107. Mod grandarent UP! by aasitus · · Score: 1

    I've never understood why it's so bad to make jokes about serious issues.

    Really, as long as it's not something like "lol thousand gazillion people died hahah stoopid niggerrsss they should've moved to New York hahaha", I mean, actually laugh at the disaster itself, I think it's pretty ok to realize that Quake is also a video game.

    I'd mod the joke up if I could.

    1. Re:Mod grandarent UP! by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I was joking about the headline text, not the disaster. Geez, some people need to get a grip.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  108. Geek tie-in by Shipwack · · Score: 1

    Granted, the loss of life is tragic, but what about other conseqences? Are there any electronics or IT industries affected? Are we going to see the price of memory or electronic components go up due to damaged factories, warehouses, or communication disruption? Not that paying more for RAM is anywhere near as tragic as the loss of life there, of course.

  109. Laird Hamilton who? by GerbilSocks · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow! This would make for some whoopass big wave surfin'!

  110. Is it bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it bad, if the first thing I thought of while reading the title was that they got addicted to Quake, much like a significant portion of the South Korean population stayed home on the launch of World of Warcraft?

  111. Sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'm not related to those mud people.

  112. You have it wrong by DigiShaman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow, that post is full of so much BS that I could almost see it as parody. ...and now for the *real* reason...

    It's not about work ethic or skills. The reason westerners are so expensive is because of our on-going materialistic lifestyles. Simple as that really. Other developing nations live on a minimalist-survival level. And if those said countries have the skills, they will practically work for free compared to a westerners counter part. Yet ironically, those programmers in India are still making a kings ransom worth in relation to the rest of the citizens in India.

    As a side note, the influx of work provided by western investment is causing a huge boom in the local India economy. Already India is seeing a demand for motorcycles and luxury cars. It wont be long (culture wise) before the citizens of India too start demanding the same materialistic lifestyles we enjoy just like in Europe, America, Japan, and China (in the process).

    Basically, think of this as global economic equilibrium in its purist form.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  113. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by hughk · · Score: 1
    If you drop a stone in the water, it makes a splash, I think most people would understand that. Such a big earthquake would not only have been recorded but it would normally set off alarms to get the seismologists attention. If promptly recognised, then those in India/Sri Lanka should have had an hour or so's warning.

    I would have thought that news of a massive earthquake at sea backed by warnings of a tsunami would have worried enough people to get them to move (possible panic being another issue.

    Cyclone's don't tend to create tsunami's as such, more the low pressure builds up water levels which can then be pushed further inland by the winds. This is a gradual process (like an extremely high tide), rather than the sudden impact of a tsunami.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  114. Re:And still You are the most pius prats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many indonesians smoke often pirated Philip Morris.
    The Indians are even worse with their foul smelling bidis. Bet they wont be able to get their matches to strike now

  115. Diego Garcia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its about the same distance from the epicenter as some of the areas in India being hit hard. The highest elevation of Diego Garcia is about 20 meters. And at this time I'd expect it jam pack with equipment and personnel.

  116. Tsunami warnings in the Indian Ocean by baquiano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interestingly enough, the Arthur C. Clarke Foundation was working in a project to provide early warnings / relief support in the event of tsunamis. From the Arthur C. Clarke Foundation's website (see here):

    PROJECT WARN in Partnership with the Japan US Science Technology and Space Applications Program (JUSTSAP). The purpose of Project Warn is combine enhanced communications and IT systems to provide warning of impending natural or man-made disasters and to provide on-going communications and remote sensing and GIS support during disaster relief operations. The Clarke Foundation is working with the Pacific Disaster Center, the Asian Disaster Mitigation Organization, the United Nations, and the US and Japanese Governments as coordinated through the JUSTSAP organization to carry out a suitable test and demonstration in this area. In particular a simulation and test is being planned in the Pacific Region in 2005 to determine to how to use the latest information and sensing technology more effectively in the advent of that a major Tsunami might impact an Asian country or island. Clarke Foundation personnel are providing technical advice and support on a volunteer basis to this project.[ emphasis mine]

    Note that the test was scheduled for 2005... unfortunately a little too late. Also, they were focusing on the Pacific instead of the Indian Ocean. Given that Clarke himself lives in Sri Lanka, I wonder how the current events would affect the project. It is clear to me that the Indian Ocean has been somewhat neglected.

    --
    You're bound to be unhappy if you optimize everything. --Donald Knuth
  117. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess what Christ Lover.

    God hates you and doesnt want you in heaven with your half understood thology and your simplistic views. Nice gentle indonesians on the other hand well gather them in

    Seriously if you are some kind of theist maybe you should study philosophy and try and understand what your religion is about?

    What I hate most about the evangelist moron wing of the christian faith is that they cant be bothered to even understand their own faith

  118. are we going to see insensitive douchebags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    make more idiotic 'helpful' 'insightful' posts?

    1. Re:are we going to see insensitive douchebags by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Insensitive he may be, but not long after lamenting the human cost, I wondered also what this would do to the cost of DRAM. Call me insensitive. I prefer pragmatic.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  119. why are their bodies weird? by polished+look+2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hi. Did anyone notice in the photographs that those that have been earthly-killed seem to have strange arm positions? Is that a common sign from a drowning? Does anyone know?

  120. Tsunami Survival Question by sh0rt+r0und · · Score: 1

    I know someone who was diving on a boat on a small island some distance from Phuket. Is there any chance he could have survived?

    Hoping anyone with knowledge of how tsunami's work might have a good idea. Would he be carried with the wave or would it just pass him?

    Thanks for any responses

    1. Re:Tsunami Survival Question by Multipleg · · Score: 1

      I believe ships are advised to move out away from land in the event of an approaching Tsunami. Ships in the area are being asked not to come to shore for 24 hours.

    2. Re:Tsunami Survival Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no... a Tsunami is not a normal tidal wave. a tidal wave mealy causes particles in the water to move up and down... a Tsunami however causes the water to move. he would have been swept inland with the wave when it hit if he was close enough to shore.... if he was out near the shelf then there is a good chance he did not even feel it.

    3. Re:Tsunami Survival Question by cdcarter · · Score: 1

      Depending on how close to the shore he was, he could have made it, but he would have to be pretty far out.

      --
      "Love is like a trampoline, first it's like "SWEET!!" then it's like *BLAMM!*"
    4. Re:Tsunami Survival Question by KayakFun · · Score: 1
      Tsunamis in deep water have almost unnoticeable amplitude and speed around 900kph. The shallower the water, the higher and slower the wave.

      The deeper the water (the further away from the shore), the more likely he survived.

      Because Phuket is an island, he could be lucky to dive on the safe side of the island.

  121. we could help if we werent bogged down in iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unfortunately that is neither funny nor false

  122. yhbt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good job.

  123. mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    Slashdot aint CNN.
    Is it devoid of any original content or in-depth analysis? Does it show the same stories over and over and over again? Are the adverts intrusive and increasing? You may wish to reconsider your statement.
    You idiots browsing at 1 or above are missing some good stuff here.
  124. mod randroid up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly the sort of consideration that should have been integrated into the summary to render it topical for the site.

  125. point? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    what the hell does that have to do with the poster, or the story?

    nothing.

    Don't use those people deaths as an excuse to be prejudice.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:point? by wk633 · · Score: 1

      My point had everything to do with the comment to which it replied. The poster said that 6000 dead is not an outstanding loss of life. Actually, considering what the death toll will rise to, I beg to differ.

      However, it's not really the number of dead that make it newsworthy. The total number of dead on 9/11 was, relatively speaking, pretty insignificant, but it was an extremely newsworthy event.

      It's not how many die, but the shoking way in which they die, that grabs our attention. As someone else noted, the same number will die of smoking, and probably in car accidents as well. We don't find those newsworthy because they happen all the time.

      Planes flying into buildings and earthquakes like this don't happen every day. That they happen outside my backyard doesn't make them less newsworthy.

      To say that today's news is only relevant if it affects the price of RAM is, or someone I know, is IMO prejudiced.

  126. It is only going to get worse by 3arwax · · Score: 1, Troll

    My heart goes out to those affected but it will only get worse. I looked at the list of major quakes since 1900 and it seemed that almost half were in the last 10 years. Do you think that maybe the Bible is right? What can we do to help those who are affected? What can we do to prepare for ourselves for such events? 72 hour kits are a great way to start.

    1. Re:It is only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes the bible was right

      and a big fat man in a red suit came through my chimney last night to deliver gifts.

      And my penis is EXTREMELY LARGE

    2. Re:It is only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, no. You can look here and see for yourself. The number of major earthquakes isn't even above average. Of course the average they give for earthquakes over 7.0 is only based on observations since 1990, so you can look here and do your own comparison. You'll see that the average number of major earthquakes was actually lower for the first four years of the new millenium than for quite a few other four year periods.

  127. Re:Stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably confused "geek" with "gook".

    Mod parent down. I can't believe some of the modding here.

  128. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thread needs a "-1, Sick".

  129. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    San Francisco, 1905. No Christians there ?

  130. Earthquakes and Undersea Cables by Vryl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Various bits of the net are hard to get at right now (from Oz, that is ...).

    Wondering if the quake has caused any probs ... anyone heard any reports?

    1. Re:Earthquakes and Undersea Cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Various bits of the net are hard to get at right now (from Oz, that is ...)."

      they let you use the internet in prison?

    2. Re:Earthquakes and Undersea Cables by Vryl · · Score: 1

      Too funny ...

      Australia was, of course, a collection of penal colonies for the British for quite a while.

    3. Re:Earthquakes and Undersea Cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you said penal.. heh heh.

  131. Re:How long until we blame America by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Uh, you do also realize that there were a large number of Christian tourists at these beaches, correct? I was reading articles about people snorkelling/sunbathing being swept away. If God's after the "non-believers", he shouldn't wave his hand and wipe away hundreds/thousands of his own disciples.

  132. Re:This is Geek news? by Patik · · Score: 1

    I don't mean to downplay the earthquake, but people died on 9/11 at the hands of terrorists while people died on 12/26/04 at the hands of nature. One was preventable, the other one wasn't. One was man-vs-man, the other was nature-vs-man. Apples and oranges.

  133. CNN - I don't knwo about FOX by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    The last time I was in Malaysia I watched CNN and it was like being on another planet. The resemblence of what is broadcast in North America to what is broadcast in Malaysia was so weak that I could not believe it was the same organisation.

    So I would not put too much weight on what CNN is broadcasting here as far as being america-centric is conserned.

    1. Re:CNN - I don't knwo about FOX by oneiron · · Score: 1

      Stay in school.

    2. Re:CNN - I don't knwo about FOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded?

  134. Re:How long until we blame America by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    What is ironic is the OP is suggesting that people unrelated to 9/11 are being punished for it by god. Whoops, don't mean to tweak you folks, "God".

    Now that, my friends, is truly a work of art. Troll or unintentional, it's still a post worthy of reading.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  135. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No quake in Japan killed anybody in 2002, and certainly not on Boxing Day. You need psychiatric help, my friend.

  136. yarr, English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/their/there/

  137. burn holywood burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "2. 6000 dead is not an astounding loss of life."

    and this is why whenever i see a picture of the former world trade centers i sit back and smile

    americans are the cancer of the earth.

    1. Re:burn holywood burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rock to Anonymous Coward: Please crawl home, I'm lonely.

    2. Re:burn holywood burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot meet kettle. Kettle meet pot.

    3. Re:burn holywood burn by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      and this is why whenever i see a picture of the former world trade centers i sit back and smile

      americans are the cancer of the earth.


      And that attitude is why nobody will care when you get blown away by terrorists/earthquakes/tidal waves.

      People like you are the cancer of the earth, regardless of which country you live in!
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  138. 'Inamura no hi' by suikyo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a Japanese, and I feel I heard of the legend, but uncertain.
    So I googled.
    see the full story(Japanese page)

    The story was known as one article of our very old language arts schoolbook of national elementary schools. It was published about from 1937 to 1947. I've never seen the text, of cource, but I think I heard this story from my teacher.
    This is a story about a farmar and an earthquake which hitted Kishu (now, Wakayama Pref.), in 1854. Outline of the story is totally same as Rob Carr described above. In addition, he is not just a farmer, but a 7th meister of Yamasa soy sauce factory, a first chairman of council of Wakayama Pref., and a first minister of Post Office Dept. (It was a era of revolution...)
    For foreign countries, Lafcadio Hearn (known as Yakumo Koizumi in Japan) introduced this story first, in his book 'Gleanings in Buddha-Fields (ISBN:1596050217 or other)'. One Japanese teacher rewrited this to a simple and dense text for children, and choosed as an article of textbook by the nation. This version is re-translated to English, and taken in textbook of Colorado state elementary school, titled 'The burning of the rice fields' (the page is saying so. I don't know it's true or not).

    Actually, in Japan, everyone knows, I believe, that sea surface oftenly drawn off before a Tsunami. We live with earthquakes, typhoons, volcanos, and fires (because of densely build old wooden houses). We are so careful(even an exess sometimes) and preparing for such disasters, so we can imagine to some degree what is going on. It is terrible to have a great Tsunami without no warning and information. Systems and informations are required.

  139. Q. Wow Honey! Where do we go for Xmas? by geomon · · Score: 1

    A. Hundreds of miles from the mainland where you don't have the luxury of being able to run 100 miles more inland and a few hundred feet UP.

    This was probably not exactly great for those folks who are the permanent residents either.

    The Pacific always carries these threats, and others more severe. The regions that are plagued by earthquakes are also often in close proximity to volcanoes.

    The Pacific Coast of Washington State is ringed with small two-lane highways where you can drive right on to the beach. If you step out of your vehicle and wander around long enough you will see traffic-type signs indicating tsunami evacuation routes. These are the black-bordered yellow signs with the little AOL creature running in the direction of the arrow.

    Within 100 miles of those tsunami signs sit the Cascade Mountains, which comprise the northeastern range of the Ring of Fire.

    This is the reward for living next to the "Pacific" Ocean. The City of Grunge and its outlying area has the great fortune to live near ~9.0 magnitude capable faults, and a volcano ring that can distribute all manner of pyroclastic and other major debris flows.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Q. Wow Honey! Where do we go for Xmas? by sleeeper · · Score: 1

      Here are some images of the signs in Washington State: Sign images

    2. Re:Q. Wow Honey! Where do we go for Xmas? by sleeeper · · Score: 1
      Earthquakes can be fun (i.e, interesting natural events like snow) if we engineer our lives properly.

      Of course, I was dumb/ill informed and was almost crushed by my filing cabinet a few years ago in an earthquake (note the crushed chair that I was sitting in just before diving under my desk).

      Thankfully they do drill us from an early age in the northwest to hide under our desks (where I immediately went) at the first shake. Drills work, even though they seem dorky at the time. They just need to tell us more about not having tall heavy unsecured object nearby....

    3. Re:Q. Wow Honey! Where do we go for Xmas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 9.0 quake? That is what the USGS is rating this at now. You are not going to engineer a 9.0 structure or response anyone can afford. You quite literally will be crushed under your desk if you cam stay there. The shaking in a 9.0 quake is going to shake you right out from under your desk.

  140. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    funniest Slashdot post in a while.

  141. Video? by Jack+Greenbaum · · Score: 1
    Anyone found any free video of the tsunami coming ashore?

    -- Jack

  142. strange coincidence: exactly one year after Iran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly one year ago, (dec 26th, 2004) a massive earthquake (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4125385.st m ) hit Iran and approximately 30,000 people died then. I know there's no real link between the two, but it's still 'strange'.

  143. What a waste that you exist. by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Gee, since that happened in the 60's, and none of the people that are there now or current governments were involved, some of us might just worry about people in general. Some of us might even think you are a dickhead for be so against any military personell anywhere you would rather they all drown instead of being punished for something that happened 40 years ago.

    Somebody needs a serious reality check, and to re-think their mental framework - a clue for the dense (you); it's not me.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  144. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People just lost their friends and loved ones, and you say big fucking deal?

    Pray to god we don't get news any of your friends or family dying. We'll be there carrying banners saying " Big Fucking Deal "

    Get all these freaks coming out of the woodworks.

  145. Los Gigantos by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The island is called Los Gigantos, the one that Mt Teide is located on. The volcano itself isn't the real threat, it's the cliffs that rise almost a mile above the shore, with a fault line less than a mile offshore.

    --
    Yup...
    1. Re:Los Gigantos by ToKsUri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't want to sound rude, but I live here and there is no island called los Gigantos. There is however an area of tenerife (the island where Mt Teide is) which is called Los Gigantes, and are high cliffs indeed. This is not an important mistake, but I am interested in what you are talking about. Where have you read/heard about it?

    2. Re:Los Gigantos by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Here's one story:
      http://www.rense.com/general56/tsu.htm

      Otherwise google tsunami canary islands eastern seaboard.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    3. Re:Los Gigantos by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      he island is called Los Gigantos, the one that Mt Teide is located on.

      Mt Teide is on Tenerife. However, the faultline actually runs through La Palma, a totally-different island.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    4. Re:Los Gigantos by Optali · · Score: 1

      I was wrong to, the case of el Hierro is not related to this one, it took place 50.000 years ago, but the new tread comes from the Cumbre Vieja mountain: Link in Spanish
      This volcano is actually not active, but it's not considered to be death.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
  146. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you just pretend to care (and fool yourself in the process), watch teevee and discuss with others how horrible the loss of life was, I have just one thing to say - you are an idiot!

    So, you don't think the loss of life was terrible, moron? Just because it's not on the list of the most common causes of death it's not making it better, you asshole. Tell me, our Great Math Genius, terrorism, murders, are also not on the list, should one not care about them eiher?

  147. Re:A drop in the sea by Cheeze · · Score: 0, Troll

    you're dead inside.

    "OK, so 10000 people died. Big fucking deal."

    unbelievable.

    --
    Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  148. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people say stuff like that but magically forget when talking about something that pertains to them more personally... like 9/11, if parent is a US citizen.

  149. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the same guy who mocked and "lol"ed in many posts arguing that nobody knew what caused the phases of the moon, drawing from a grade-school religious science textbook. All this despite the mountains of evidence given that proved him wrong. Basically a fucking idiot or humorless troll whose words should not be heeded.

    Here's a timely and apt quote from the bottom of the /. page...
    There is no sin but ignorance. -- Christopher Marlowe

  150. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how many does it need to be to stop being a big deal? Would you care to quantify that for us?

    It's a big deal to people if they are involved with the disaster. You are basically calling 10,000 dead people idiots because they happened to be killed by a natural disaster that nobody warned them about, or was unpredictable. Big fucking deal if you don't care, perhaps it wouldn't be such a trivial matter if it was your town or city which had been hit.

  151. Re:This is Geek news? by tbjw · · Score: 1

    But the theory of the propogation of Tsunamis is, and the problem of warning people is, and GEOLOGISTS ARE NERDS TOO.

  152. Re:A drop in the sea by Xiaran · · Score: 0

    you're dead inside. "OK, so 10000 people died. Big fucking deal." unbelievable.

    Seconded. There are people who dont know if loved ones are alive or dead right now. My heart goes out to you guys... thankfully all the people I know in that region are OK... Take care all you SE asian slashdotters.

  153. Re:Nature's way of population thining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, if nature was effective morons like you would be the first to go.

  154. And to think... by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

    CNN interrupted the breaking story this morning to talk about delayed holiday flights and how unfortunate those who were late for Christmas were. Kinda puts things in perspective, doesn't it?

  155. Earlier earthquake of 8.1. Next what? by igny · · Score: 1

    Japan, Kamchatka, Alaska, Washington, California, Mexico, Chile?

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  156. I just missed the action... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in Koh Phangen Island off Thailand. Also passed through Phukit (Sheesh! Whotta name). Beutiful Islands, and as I recall, I think it missed the Full Moon party by just a day or so.

    Every full moon, on Koh Phangen, all the "Trance heads" have their usual monthly ritual... Although the Island is on the other side of the Malaysian Penninsula (somewhat protected), I suspect it also got hit pretty hard. No word on anything yet, because I was unable to reach my friend in Bangkok.

    If I get any word, I'll post it here....

    A Global Raver

  157. Hey we have nuclear weapons and are going to space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Natural disasters like these are in nature's hands. The only thing we can do is stockpile nuclear weapons and send a few previliged men to moon. That is going to help us in the loooooong run.

  158. Take all your "aid" back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of all the developed nations the US donates the lowest percentage of GDP in aid, and that includes all the corporate welfare masquerading as aid.

    So take it back. All of it. Then piss off and leave us alone. Learn to get over your messiah complex. You're far more trouble than you're worth. Go home.

    1. Re:Take all your "aid" back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'd love to, but your type keep giving money away. And you might want to learn German.

  159. So terrorism is ok... by b1scuit · · Score: 1

    ...if it comes from god?

  160. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the one that hit Tasmania on the 24th? Are they are muslims? What about all the possibly Christian tourists there now?

    Finally, isn't it interesting that thse evetns all happened on one of the seismicly most violent areas of the world, the Ring of Fire?

    Or wait, no, you're right. See, God created teh Ring of Fire, then created man, THEN made sure that all the non-believer's settled NEAR the ring of fire (except all us Christians in Canada, Cali, Mexico, etc.) so that he could punish them on a date holy to Christians that is UNRELATED to actual events of Christ's life....yeah....

    BTW's, for info on Christmas, look up the Coucil of Nicea (Nicene Creed, anyone?) and the early history of the Church. Peter Brown has some good stuff.

    As a Christian i find you to be abhorent. You are the reason the rest of the world hates us.

  161. Re:How long until we blame America by CreationLtd · · Score: 1

    Well, that would explain Cyclone Tracy, 1974 Christmas Day that devastated Darwin. Hotbed of heathens, them Aussies.

  162. Oh boy... by cyranoVR · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Finally a human tragedy I'm allowed to get upset about.

    Before you click "Troll," please hear me out:

    On each anniversary of September 11th, I've consistently encountered people who asserted that our grief was selfish and unjustified because "worse disasters had happened elsewhere" - that is, had a higher bodycount.

    Here's just one example:
    Where were you on Jan 26, 2001? Do you remember any news that happened that day at all?

    On that date, an earthquake hit India, leaving 13,000 people dead.

    thirteen thousand. More than four times the amount killed in the World Trade Center. Think about that for a minute. How much coverage of it did you see on CNN? Maybe a day?
    This seems to be the prevailing attitude among many: the scale of a human tragedy is directly proportional to it's bodycount. It's an attitude I've encountered multiple times in Real Life as well as on /.

    Well, I'd like to write now what I wrote then, over two years ago...someting to keep in mind while you're reading this coverage:

    The very notion that the relative significance of human tragedies can be "ranked" by their respective bodycounts is itself sickening.
    1. Re:Oh boy... by krenskeoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, what you have here is ethical considerations, effecting what is litterally a ranking exercise. Human minds ( without personal emotional impacts ) tend to rank things. How do you rank tragedy, easy, death count. In some western nations the death tolls are normally so low we fall back on monetary costs.

      So why did 9/11 have more impact than an earthquake in India? that is simple. 1000 times greater airplay caused it to have a major human emotional impact to a lot of people. Now why did that happen, again simple, no one even had to move much to film and broadcast the disaster. The attacks on 9/11 were delivered to one of the most electronically and media dense places on the planet. While an earthquake in India may well have not even been appearing in papers on the far side of the nation after a week.

      I have similar thoughts regarding ranking Genocide etc. When people attempt to rank genocides I simply state that each was an attempt to destroy a culture. The size of the culture is irrelevant, the thing that makes it bad is that the attempt was made at all.

    2. Re:Oh boy... by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


      People die so often and in such great numbers in so many varied disasters that ranking them is all we can do to set the scope of one disaster over another. Get over it.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    3. Re:Oh boy... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      It's also one thing to look at a catastrophe that is a natural event and quite another to look at one that is the result of sheer, unbridled hatred and desire to kill. The latter tends to be ranked as a worse catastrophe because it makes us dislike ourselves as a race. After all, humans made a conscious decision to murder as many people as possible, whereas the Earth didn't get up this morning and decide to kill 11,000 people. The fact that the catastrophe was a result of a conscious decision makes it 100x worse than a natural disaster.

    4. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      tragedy = bodycount/distance

    5. Re:Oh boy... by jonhaug · · Score: 1
      This is sad. The most important aspect of the 11/9-attack is that it was purposefully. It is said that one can bear a tragedy when it is a result of an accident or a natural catastrophy. However, when you are a victim of some action carried out by purpose, you live with your grief the rest of your life. This makes, in some sense, the Twin tower attack much worse.


      However, I find emotionless sarcasm in your message. Why is that?

    6. Re:Oh boy... by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      You're right, human lives cannot be summed to show that one tragedy is greater than another. To classify 9/11 as a "greater" or "lesser" tragedy based solely on the death toll is both ignorant and disrespectful of the victims of that tragedy.

      However, without regard to death tolls, I think it is important to realize that a tragedy at home inspired months (years?) of news coverage, speculation, op ed pieces, commemerative works, etc, while a tragedy that would be on the same scale if such a scale could exist received comparitively little.

      So, I guess what I mean is that it's prefectly okay, indeed right, to mourn the events of 9/11. But it's also okay to critisize the news media in our country for disproportionally covering events that affect Americans, playing on our fear and sorrow for ratings.

      If this doesn't make sense, it's cause I'm drunk. But hey, at least I'm not using my mod points while drunk.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    7. Re:Oh boy... by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      But it's also okay to critisize the news media in our country for disproportionally covering events that affect Americans, playing on our fear and sorrow for ratings.

      Great point with which I agree 100%

      It's definitely ok to criticize the media for glamourizing the grief of September 11th, the tsunami, or any other human tragedy.

      The problem I have is with people that tell other human beings they have no right to their own emotions.

    8. Re:Oh boy... by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't know who you talk to, and I don't think that catastrophes should be ranked so that we can grieve only about the "worst" ones.

      However, consider that some of those you've spoken to might have been comparing the amount of grief shown for the 9/11 attack in contrast to the perceived apathy for other (worse or otherwise) catastrophes. It's not that you're not allowed to grieve for 9/11, but that (in their perception) you've ignored all others. There's some truth to that, if you measure concern by media coverage or charitable donations.

      If victimhood and sense of loss cannot bring out our common humanity, what would?

    9. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The very notion that the relative significance of human tragedies can be "ranked" by their respective bodycounts is itself sickening.

      So, what do you suggest, that we rank it by race?

      Perhaps the rest of the world is just fed up with hearing about 9/11 when they are experiencing worse tragedies themselves.

      Oh no, an American scraped his knee! Rest of the world, stop what you are doing, shut the fuck up and mourn! The world has changed!

    10. Re:Oh boy... by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      However, consider that some of those you've spoken to might have been comparing the amount of grief shown for the 9/11 attack in contrast to the perceived apathy for other (worse or otherwise) catastrophes.

      Good point...too bad that's not what they have been saying (follow the link in my original post).

      They haven't been saying: "United States, your tragedy sucks...so does ours...let's all mourn for each others's tragedies."

      Rather, it's been: "United States, stop being such fucking babies, other peoples have it much worse than you."

      The equivalent is somebody deriding a weeping mourner at a funeral: "How dare you cry?! Others have it much worse!" (this happens too, btw).

      The point is: somepeople are just insensitive assholes :-\

    11. Re:Oh boy... by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      However, I find emotionless sarcasm in your message. Why is that?

      You tell me.

    12. Re:Oh boy... by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      People die so often and in such great numbers in so many varied disasters that ranking them is all we can do to set the scope of one disaster over another. Get over it.

      I suppose if you were producing VH1's 100 Greatest Disasters EVAR!, this might be a true statement.

  163. bbc news video at 20:30 by smoker2 · · Score: 1
  164. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 1

    So how many does it need to be to stop being a big deal? Would you care to quantify that for us?

    Would you? How many does it need to become a big deal? Any specific number is clearly arbitrary, but overall I'd say that ordinary people should not care until it's at least ten times that. Of course, relatives, friends, emergency services, humanitarian agencies, media outlets, geologists and the like have their reasons to be concerned, but the majority of people clearly have no reason at all to worry. I am not calling those who died or those who lost a friend idiots, I am calling idiots the 99.99% of people, who will not be affected in any way, but pretend that they give a shit.

    I am just asking for some rationality. Yes, if it's your city, you need to be worried. Yes, if your sister was on vacation in that region, you need to be worried. But most of us shouldn't. And if someone wants to worry about global issues, about people suffering in remote regions of the world, then he is an idiot, because a child still dies from hunger every five seconds, which means about 17 thousand children in the world die from hunger every day. This is more than died in that stupid earthquake, this only includes children and this happens every fucking day of the year, not just once in 40 decades. So I am saying that if someone obviously cares about this stupid earthquake, but does not care about much greater number of people dying otherwise, that person is an idiot.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  165. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 0, Troll

    1) I am not a US citizen.
    2) I don't care about a few hundreds people dying each year from terrorism in my country.
    3) I do care about statistically significant threats, such as car accidents and heart desease.
    4) I did not object to people who cared because they had a reason to care, such as living in Sri Lanka. I object to people, who live on the other side of the world, have no friends/relatives who are affected, are not affected in any other way, but still act as if they care, because they were conditioned to react that way and because "it's on TV", while not giving a flying shit about real problems, such as (for starters) world hunger.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  166. welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is an astounding loss of life, and a healthy fraction of the posts are just evil. If this is what slashdot has come to, prejudice, intolerance and ill-will for those that have suffered, I'm outta here. These are your brethren. Mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, uncles and aunts that have been hit by an unannounced, unpreventable, and unknowable tragedy. I'm appalled.

    The stereotypical Slashdot computer geek is an amoral dork who rarely wanders away from his computer, which is probably located in his parents' basement. There are exceptions, but that's the stereotype. Enjoy.
  167. Pragmatic? by realitybath1 · · Score: 0

    I'd use the word 'bore'.

    1. Re:Pragmatic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would.

  168. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, do I have any reason to expect otherwise? There are more than 6 billion people living on Earth. With that many people, most of whom are not immortal yet, death is to be expected. Several hundreds of thousands of people die every day. Now there are 10000 more. Could you explain, why exactly this is a big deal? Why exactly should we care?

    P.S. Of course, it's a big deal to those who losed their loved ones, but let me tell you, I didn't and I bet you didn't too. In fact, assuming about 100 close friends per victim (I am being extremely generous), only about 0.015% of all people on Earth have such personal reason to care.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  169. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 1

    Do you cry every time 10000 people die? Do you at least make a sad face and observe a minute of silence each time 10000 people die? May you you should start now? After all, you would need to sob only for half an hour each day, because, no matter how big of a surprise it is for you, 300000 people die each day.

    May be you would explain how you react to all those deaths, or the "live inside" one? Please take a moment of your busy schedule mourning the untold deaths and explain us how you care about an even greater tragedy happening each day? And if (as I suspect) you don't give a crap about those other deaths, then please explain the reason for such a difference in attitudes.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  170. want to blame someone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    blame USA for not signing the kyoto treaty.

    USA is responsible for 1/4 of all the greenhouse gases effects but represents only 1/25 of world population.

    glaciar ice melting and the increase of water mater is one of the side effects of the global warmming.

    1. Re:want to blame someone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      blame USA for not signing the kyoto treaty.

      USA is responsible for 1/4 of all the greenhouse gases effects but represents only 1/25 of world population.

      glaciar ice melting and the increase of water mater is one of the side effects of the global warmming.

      +1 insightful, what the fuck? We need emergency moderation in here!
    2. Re:want to blame someone ? by bluewhale · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should read the news first, before jumping to blame the US . This was caused by tectonic plate movements http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsunami/ and has nothing to do global warming.

    3. Re:want to blame someone ? by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

      "blame USA for not signing the kyoto treaty."

      As far as I know, global warming doesn't increase or decrease the likehood of earthquakes one bit, so how you can blame this on the USA is beyond me. Maybe I'm missing something. Like to explain your logic?

    4. Re:want to blame someone ? by jonhuang · · Score: 1
      Hello, troll (and troll-mod).


      This disaster has nothing to do with greehouse warming and the increase in water 'mater,' and everything to do with earthquakes. In fact, I cannot comprehend what sort of though processes could lead to such a conclusion.


      PS. Please do not spin tragedy into personal political agenda. Bush did that too.

    5. Re:want to blame someone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, global warming doesn't increase or decrease the likehood of earthquakes one bit

      As far as i know wasnt the earthquake that killed hundreds, thousands of ppl in south asia last morning.

    6. Re:want to blame someone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure about the tsunamis? since all that (extra)water came from one spot its everything related pal.

      Isnt directly related but he doesnt directly implies it either.

    7. Re:want to blame someone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      PS. Please do not spin tragedy into personal political agenda. Bush did that too.


      Funny that you talk about personal *POLITICAL* agenda when no one had mention president BUSH. I rather think you found useful to push that upfront, maybe your own personal agenda, right?

      Kyoto protocol was drafted by United Nations.

    8. Re:want to blame someone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes everyone knows that the gap goes from san francisco USA to Italy Europe.

      And yes everyone knows that glaciar ice melting is responsible for all that superflous water that goes in the oceans.

      And yes everyone knows that the global warming is the result of gases emissions and polution of industrialized developed countries.

      Everyone knows that aftershock will exist. There will be compensation all over the world, while stabilization is not reached.

      A fisherman alone in the sea with his boat not right positioned can be overturned by a big silent wave result of replicas, and ppl living along coastline much take care, specially on calm days with no breze where no winds from the mountains can force feed back the currents back to the sea.

      Really USA is the one to blame but its an indirect responsability.

      Can not be directly related to this insue. Despite what this ends to show is that something is beeing cooked by mother earth, and some big could happen in no time soon.

      Indian ocean other times not analysed for this kind of phenonemous, and prior earthquakes in Turkey and arabic soil around the mediterraneum sea is a sign from the core of the earth, that humans should take action to stop hurting and protect the enviroment.

      World uniformization of measures to be apply must be reached!

    9. Re:want to blame someone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should read the news first, before jumping to blame the US . This was caused by tectonic plate movements http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsunami/ and has nothing to do global warming.

      huh dead vikiwiki link?

      do some research and you will see how global warming is related or in the end can process big enough tsunamis that travel entire oceans in hours.

      With more water theres more pressure on the seafloor and the tectonic plates, that increases the risk of landslides.

    10. Re:want to blame someone ? by thisgooroo · · Score: 1

      more likely the moronic exhaust from your head is reponsible (unless, of courde, you can demonstrate that global warming has anything to do with earthquaake caused tsunamis)

    11. Re:want to blame someone ? by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

      "As far as i know wasnt the earthquake that killed hundreds, thousands of ppl in south asia last morning."

      No, it was a tsunami, caused by the earthquake. So, your point is what exactly?

    12. Re:want to blame someone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are the bombs that kill people or are the mans that make wars?

    13. Re:want to blame someone ? by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

      "are the bombs that kill people or are the mans that make wars?" No, it's the Anonymous Coward that is stupid and offtopic.

  171. Re:How long until we blame America by justins · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I know it is an unpopular view and I will be immediately marked down for saying so, but I believe this is an act of a higher power.

    When you look at it Islam Buddhist Hindu were the one's that suffered, all non christians in non christian nations. And on one of Christianity's more holy of days. Now you could say this is just a one off? a coincidence? What about Christmas in 2003. Same day to the year 40,000 killed in Bam in Iran. Again a non christian nation made to suffer at the hand of a higher power on Christianity's day.

    And in 2002 same day exactly to the year also Japan suffered a large quake killing hundreds more non christians. Three in a row is just too many to ignore or leave up to chance. Which non christian nation to be struck on Christmas 2005?

    Punishment for non believers and 9/11 I think?

    Hot Anime Gallery's [sharkfire.net]

    I have a message from God, to you, Saven Marek:
    YOU ARE GOING TO HELL FOR ALL THAT WHACKING OFF TO HENTAI THAT YOU DO. REPENT.
    --
    Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  172. Re:A drop in the sea by realitybath1 · · Score: 0

    Wow! You are a persistent moron... but you should refrain from contradicting yourself in regards to your earlier posts. Then you should look up 'ordinal numbers' and 'cardinal numbers' think a bit more about your ridiculous arguments, taking into consideration the added possibility that reality may not consist solely of numbers. Finally, you should pick up a few books on rationality, and for good measure anything about the completeness of logic, polishing that off with a side-foray into quasi-rational thinking (hmm... I bet you could benefit from a book on quasi-rational economics since you're probably the type to troll economic related threads with your outstanding obtuseness, and that dash of juvenile arrogance). It should take you a few months before you post again. Really, I'm finding myself much more irritated by the amazingly irrational posts from self-agrandizing technical geeks than any 'irrational' and kind-hearted posts from lay geeks.

  173. Re:How long until we blame America by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    Is that you, Dubya?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  174. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you look at it Islam Buddhist Hindu were the one's that suffered, all non christians in non christian nations.

    Never mind the fact that the earthquake hit in Indonesia's Aceh province, with a siginificant Christian population (you'd know that if you bothered to follow the news outside of America).

    And on one of Christianity's more holy of days.

    Boxing Day? Or does God follow US time?

  175. Re:This is Geek news? by 343+Guilty+Spark · · Score: 1

    Well my brother who works for Weta Workshop is in Thailand where some of the damage has been done, we haven't heard from him yet. But there is a geek connection.

  176. there were some warning signs by frooddood · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was a huge earthquake (8.1 on Richter) south of Tasmania 3 days before. It made headlines http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000081&si d=aUIanL7wC_m8&refer=australia/ but fortunately no victims. However if you look at a map of tectonic plates http://geology.about.com/library/bl/maps/blplatesw topoehem.htm/ and compare it with the location of the earthquake http://www.iris.edu/seismon/ you can see it happened at the southern tip of the Indian plate. Now 3 days later on the middle of the eastern edge of the same plate another huge earthquake...looks like plate movement to me.

  177. How about Sollog ? by Laz10 · · Score: 1

    Did Sollog predict this one ??

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sollog

    http://www.sollog.com/

    The stuff they have online is all "predictions" of stuff that happened in the past. If you want about the future you have to subscribe.

  178. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But there is no reason to care about 10000 dead, because this is not news at all. Especially since most of the people killed are probably uneducated simple-minded folks, who lived in shitty houses.


    Wow. Dude, just read what you wrote again, take a deep breath and think again. So let's say you (your relatives/friends) live in Russia, danila, and your flat is
    a "shithouse" by modern west european standards. I hope you did't mean that your life is less meaningfull than the life of an average european just because of that?

    I hope you would also agree that there are many people who are much smarter and received a better education than you. Do you mean then that your life is somehow worth less?

    Suggestion: look up "compassion" in the dictionary.

  179. The problem of evil by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

    Please. If you really believe that God's responsible, then you believe in a sick God: He punishes people (including innocent children) via tsunamis just because he doesn't have enough fans? I seriously doubt other Christians would share your view.

    If you believe in the God of Christianity (who is omnipotent and omniscient), this tsunami almost has to be punishment. This is a big problem area in religious philosophy, normally referred to as the problem of evil. A common argument is that suffering can actually be good, so that is why a absolutely good diety would allow disasters like this (on a smaller scale, it is like the idea of a parent spanking a child to make them a better person).

    Anyway, I would imagine quite a few Christians believe this was punishment. They don't have a lot of other choices considering the basics of their religion.

    --
    There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
  180. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Man, you just don't give up, do you? I will give you an example, I have no friends or relatives who lived in Indonesia or Sri Lanka or anywhere close. Yet I had friends who died in an earthquake in the 80s. Naturally, the recent news has affected me emotionally.

    I can easily imagine a lot of other people who lost their loved ones in a fire, quake, terrorist attack etc. The news of a big earthquake, which is repeated in mass media stirs their emotions, consciously or subconsciously.

    I am sure one can think of numerous other reasons why people get so emotionally involved.

    You can see why your estimates of how many people are allowed (by you) to feel sorry for the people who died are not very useful.

    By simpy calling everyone who cares idiots and presuming not only that you know but also that you have the right to give orders on how people should or should not react, you are making an idiot of yourself.

  181. Re:How long until we blame America by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    why would god care? life is an infinite resource, not rare. and also if he is real, he can recreate a trillion new planets any where, so why would he need to bother with micromanagement.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  182. THAT is one big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..Torrent! boy i hope that doesn't happen online.

  183. Sad news ... Stephen King, dead at 54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Horror/Sci Fi writer Stephen King was found dead in his Maine home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  184. Re:A drop in the sea by DualDescription · · Score: 1

    Our emotional reaction to an event is not a simple monotonic function of the overall number of casualties involved. All your posts seem to originate from failure to realize this simple fact. On the other hand, I may be wrong, and you do understand it, but you are saying that most people have an "idiotic" emotional reaction, but then again, this would be ridiculous. Emotions cannot be "idiotic" or "smart". Our reaction to our emotions can be "idiotic", but as you realize , no one of our fellow ./ posters jumps out of the window. So, what are you really saying?

  185. PubSub search for latest Earthquake info in blogs by bobwyman · · Score: 2, Informative

    To get the latest info on the Earthquake, try monitoring this feed from PubSub.com:

    http://rss.pubsub.com/ef/c3/b9173332d3d1011651b6f2 bd5f.xml

    Content will be updated every 15 minutes and will contain the most recent 32 blog entries that mention the event.

    bob wyman

  186. bbc news video at 21:00 by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    A longer section from the 9pm bbc news

    approx. 14 minutes divx (~105MB ) here

  187. Four times as many as 9/11... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as I write this.

    But then, hardly any of the dead were US nationals, or white, even, eh.

    Just when you think you've seen the worst of US ignorance and crass stupidity, along comes someone like maximilln, to prove there's always one just a bit worse.

  188. Death Toll up to 11k by EmagGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is truly a sad day for all of humanity. 11,000 people is a huge incredible loss of life. We can talk about the science behind tsunamis all day long, but let's all take a moment to pray for the victims of this catastrophe. Keep in mind that it's not just 11,000 dead, but it's millions homeless, without clean water or food, or a place to live.

    If you can, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE give some money to one of the many relief organizations that is working to help feed and shelter people in the affected zones. I am sure the International Red Cross would be a good place to start.

    1. Re:Death Toll up to 11k by anishm · · Score: 1

      One such organisation which will indeed appreciate your help is Association for India's Development http://survivors.aidindia.org/. They are carrying out relief work in the Indian States of Tamil Nadu (Madras) and Andhra Prades in (Hyderabad) and keep the website up to date with the latest news and their own efforts. Donations can be made online and are tax deductible in US and India. https://www.aidindia.org/aidadmin/DonateToRRF.jsp Disclaimer: I volunteer for AID princeton.aidindia.org

      --
      Race for Development http://princeton.aidindia.org/marathon/anish.html
  189. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    If promptly recognised, then those in India/Sri Lanka should have had an hour or so's warning.
    Been pouring over news reports now. The figure was two hours; we had two hours to prepare.
    I would have thought that news of a massive earthquake at sea backed by warnings of a tsunami would have worried enough people to get them to move
    While we certainly are lacking in an early warning system of the sort you have in the Pacific, like I said, I doubt anyone in a position of power put two and two together and imagined this would happen. See, like I said, this never ever happened before out here; as with bureaucratic failings of this magnitude, we were guilty of not just inaction, but also a clear lack of imagination.
  190. Old Biblical tsunami example? by rduke15 · · Score: 1

    I heard that in Krabi (Thailand) people notice the sea withdrawing uncharacteristically about 5 minutes before the first wave hit. Anyone can explain that?

    In the attempts to link the stories of the Old Testament to historic events, a tsunami in the Mediterrenean sea is used to explain how the sea "opened". Indeed, right before a tsunami, the level would first drop, letting Moses and his people cross the "sea" there, and the wave would then have drowned the Egyptian army or whoever was after them.

    In this hypothesis, Moses would have crossed from Egypt to Israel through a sort of swamp land near the mediterranean cost, where the tsunami effect wouldn't have been very brutal but rather slow. The level drop would have been enough to let people cross that swamp.

    Unfortunately, I don't have any reference. I saw that in a documentary once. And I'm certainly no expert in Biblical stuff.

    Maybe someone has some links? The part of the documentary which I saw was very interesting. It also explained the 7 plagues of Egypt, mainly with a strong volcanic eruption in the Mediterranean, which is believed to have taken place around 3000 BC if I remember correctly.

    1. Re:Old Biblical tsunami example? by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      Update of my previous post:

      The plagues of Egypt were not 7 but 10. (Sunday school didn't leave much in my brain, it seems)

      The volcanic eruption was that of Santorini, one of the strongest since the beginning of civilisation. It was not around 3000 BC, but around 1620-50 BC. The collapse of the mountain certainly provoked a big tsunami, but of course, nobody knows if this was related to the Moses "parting the sea" during the Exodus. Some say it may explain it, and others dispute it.

      A Google search for 'Santorini plagues Egypt' seems effective for more information.

  191. House pets behaving strangely by cuteface · · Score: 1

    My housemate's flower horn fish started behaving strangely since yesterday. Horn fish by nature is very aggressive. That fish would stalk me whenever I go near the tank but it had been hiding in one corner eversince. Could this be a sign of another potential quake?

    Anyone here finding their house pets behaving similarly weird?

    --
    Reality is what we taste, smell, see, hear and touch yet we cannot comprehend it...only approximate it.
  192. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 0, Troll

    Let's be realistic, shall we? All other things equal, a life of a less educated person is worth less than of a more educated one. I am aware that many people were programmed to think otherwise, and there is not much I can do about it (to explain why they are wrong requires personal contact and a few hours of my time), but I hope you are not one of them.

    Now if we agree on that one, let's consider who died in this disaster. I must admit that I didn't follow the news very closely, but from what I know about the countries hit most, there are a lot of poor people who live in poor houses, and many of those live near the coasts. Now, my house may be shitty by modern west european standards (all our west european friends were probably too polite to say that), but at least it was built moderately well and won't fall down and bury its inhabitants under the rubble.

    I am not saying that those people were somehow less worthy for living in a shitty house, I am just saying that statistically those living there were likely to have shitty education as well. And while I am certainly not saying that there can be no decent people without a quality modern education, I believe that had this disaster occured near Japan or New Zealand, the quality of "human resources" lost would be much higher.

    It's hard to quantify, especially when people imply that compassion means "everybody is as valuable as everybody else". But when people with arrow range of interest, with little knowledge of the world behind their village, with oiir understanding of history, humanity place in the universe and stuff like that die, I feel the loss is smaller than it would be if a similar number people in Holland died because their dams didn't stop a tsunami.

    I knew perfectly well that that paragraph was provocative, but I see no reason to deny my feelings about that (or lack thereof), even though it wasn't vital to my main arguments (too few people died to care).

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  193. Well, there you go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proof that outsourcing pisses off God too!

  194. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 1

    I am saying that the idiocy of our reactions IS a simple monotonic function, not a boolean one with the possible results of idiotic (jump out of the window) and not idiotic ("Indonesia? Never knew anyone from Indonesia?" Half kidding).

    The emotional reaction to the news is normal. You are shown professionally made footage of a serious disaster, it's normal too think "poor people", "I am so happy to be alive with my family here", "I once met a guy from China, I wonder how's he" (many people don't know geography well), etc. The images are supposed to evoke an emotional reaction. But, as you correctly point out, the real question is what do you do after that.

    And my view is that if you choose to
    a) watch more news about essentially the same story, which is totally irrelevant to you
    b) talk to people about how horrible it is
    c) act as if you care (even if you really believe it)
    d) act as if this is important
    then you are being more and more idiotic. Of course, it's still not idiotic enough to meet the clinical definition of idiocy, but more than enough to be called an idiot in the common sense by me.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  195. Easy to evacuate on a proper island by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

    The Maldives is a special case. However, all you'd have to do there, would be to get out onto the deep ocean.

    Anyhow - a normal relatively healthy human being can move somthing like 6 kilometers/hour on a sustained level for hours, and more like 10 if they really have to. Thus - even if you don't have enough vehicles for everyone, then half an hour or even 15 minutes of early warning would allow a substantial number of people to escape physical harm.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  196. No Tsunami Warning from the NOAA warning Center by rduke15 · · Score: 3, Informative
    This report (reproduced below) from the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center sounds weird when you know how terrible the Tsunami was on the other side.

    Basically, it says "THERE IS NO TSUNAMI WARNING OR WATCH IN EFFECT.".

    Yes, of course, there was no tsunami in the region this warning center is responsible for. But who writes these reports? Is it sensible to just write "no tsunami warning", without specifying that it's a different story on the other side, in the Indian ocean? Wouldn't people writing these reports be supposed to be aware of it?

    Anyway, that report, while it may be technically correct for it's region, sounds really weird to me.

    Since the link is for the "latest report", and will change over time, here is the complete text of that page:
    TSUNAMI BULLETIN NUMBER 002
    PACIFIC TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER/NOAA/NWS
    ISSUED AT 0204Z 26 DEC 2004

    THIS BULLETIN IS FOR ALL AREAS OF THE PACIFIC BASIN EXCEPT
    ALASKA - BRITISH COLUMBIA - WASHINGTON - OREGON - CALIFORNIA.

    .................. TSUNAMI INFORMATION BULLETIN ..................

    ATTENTION: NOTE REVISED MAGNITUDE.

    THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. THERE IS NO TSUNAMI WARNING
    OR WATCH IN EFFECT.

    AN EARTHQUAKE HAS OCCURRED WITH THESE PRELIMINARY PARAMETERS

    ORIGIN TIME - 0059Z 26 DEC 2004
    COORDINATES - 3.4 NORTH 95.7 EAST
    LOCATION - OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATERA
    MAGNITUDE - 8.5

    EVALUATION
    REVISED MAGNITUDE BASED ON ANALYSIS OF MANTLE WAVES.
    THIS EARTHQUAKE IS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE PACIFIC. NO DESTRUCTIVE
    TSUNAMI THREAT EXISTS FOR THE PACIFIC BASIN BASED ON HISTORICAL
    EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI DATA.

    THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF A TSUNAMI NEAR THE EPICENTER.

    THIS WILL BE THE ONLY BULLETIN ISSUED FOR THIS EVENT UNLESS
    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE.

    THE WEST COAST/ALASKA TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER WILL ISSUE BULLETINS
    FOR ALASKA - BRITISH COLUMBIA - WASHINGTON - OREGON - CALIFORNIA.
    1. Re:No Tsunami Warning from the NOAA warning Center by darthlurker · · Score: 1
      They are just reporting the conditions on thier area of observation; the Pacific Basin. Its sort of like hearing the NASA mission control guys mumble out that all conditions are "nominal"

      But I've noticed a hearing/seeing a number of news reports bemoaning that only the Pacific ocean merits any tsunami monitoring.

      I think its likely that India will invest in monitoring/warning systems in the near future. I'll be curious to see if the US invests in any similar disaster prevention for the East Coast.

      P.S. Any news from Diego Garcia?

  197. Re:A drop in the sea by DualDescription · · Score: 1

    I am saying that the idiocy of our reactions IS a simple monotonic function, A function of what? simple monotonic function, not a boolean one You meant continuous function? c) act as if you care (even if you really believe it) What is exactly the difference between caring and believing that you care ?

  198. Re:CSI Miami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "CSI Miami (a US TV show) had a tsunami hit Florida in the program."

    Unfortunately, due to the depth of the water between Miami and the Bahamas it is impossible to have a tsunami hit Miami. It might hit the Bahamas instead (depending on water depth). We might have a high tide, and/or rising water, but nothing like a tsunami.

    Just in case anyone was wondering... It's *just* a TV show :)

  199. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Let's be realistic, shall we? All other things equal, a life of a less educated person is worth less than of a more educated one. I am aware that many people were programmed to think otherwise, and there is not much I can do about it (to explain why they are wrong requires personal contact and a few hours of my time), but I hope you are not one of them.



    I would like to understand what you are saying.

    For the sake of this discussion, let us assume that I have Ph.D. in physics and you don't. Are you saying your life (as a life of a "less educated person") is worth less?

  200. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 1

    A function of what?
    You meant continuous function?
    A function of our emotional reactions. :) There is a large set of possible reactions, from completely ignoring that story to jumping out of the window (it's not 1-dimensional, to be honest, so it can't be easily monotonic, but I conviniently ignore that). For each possible reaction there is a value of idiocy. My point is that there are more than two possible values. And, generally, the more intensive the reaction to a story, which is not particularly important in a grand scheme of things and which has no relevance to your personal life is, the more idiotic it is.

    What is exactly the difference between caring and believing that you care ?
    Acting. Caring implies certain real actions. If you care about the victims, you do something, the most obvious actions being to send them blankets, food, money, etc. If you don't do anything, you don't actually care.

    Simple emotional reaction is natural. But just because I gross out seeing a dog hit by a truck doesn't mean that I care. If I took it home or buried it near the road (assuming it's dead, of course), that would be a sign that I cared. If I just stand there, stare, say "poor doggie" and then go away, I don't care, I just pretend I do or believe I do.

    Many people pretend they care, but they don't do anything. And as they apparently seem to care about every major story pushed by TV (they care about Yushchenko as much as about quake victims), I suspect that don't care about any story, but are just conditioned to express certain reactions when seeing something on TV.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  201. Call me paranoid by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    I'm very sad for the loss of all those souls. We are living interesting times.

    Events like this one reminds me of the HAARP project and other electromagnetic weapons to alter the weather and generate eathquakes on demand.

    Who?
    Anyone opposed to the rise of Asia. I would have to guess USA, UK-USA, etc. Remember you have a mad man in the white house.

    Why would a nation of peace loving citizens want to make such thing?
    There's a war with China planned to occur in this decade 2006-2010. By that time, China would be the 2nd superpower, and USA won't simply seat to watch it become nro 1. Odds tell that the main part of Asia will follow China.

    We are now in the early stages of this war, the preparation. One just don't get munition built from morning to evening, one has to plan for war.
    So, by generating and earthquake in the pacific, USA would acchieve 2 things. Make the future enemy spend time and money in reconstruction instead of preparation. And, possibly, take out some objetives in the way.

    Conspiracy theory? Sure. Power changes hands not because of elections and forseenable methods but succesfully executed, secret plans.

    May you live interesting times - Old Chinesse Curse

    1. Re:Call me paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score -2 (Idiot)

    2. Re:Call me paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting theory... although it doesn't seem very effective to make a mess of Thailand and India if you want to attack China.

      Maybe next time they can try it somewhere that would affect the target in question.

  202. Blizzards in southern Arizona by ccmay · · Score: 1
    blizzards are also widely known, but i doubt you would think of setting up a blizzard warning system in southern arizona or southern florida

    Well, probably not in Florida, but keep in mind that there are mountains in southern Arizona exceeding 10,000 feet elevation. I assure you they do get blizzards. Even the lower elevations can get a surprising amount of snow. I've seen 6 inches of snow in Tucson.

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
  203. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And in 2002 same day exactly to the year also Japan suffered a large quake killing hundreds more non christians

    Not according the the USGS. There were no major earthquakes in Japan that year. http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2002/

    And were Ms. Zafuto and Ms. Myrick heathens and killed three days before Christmas in Paso Robles, CA in 2003?

    So, you really only have one prior data point, that of Bam, Iran in 2003 (which was on the 26th, also)

    I can not and will not challenge your belief, but if you wish to support your belief with "facts", at least verify them first.
  204. Largest seismic event in 40 years (12,000+ dead) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    USGS reports 8.9 richter (even Bam was only 6.3).

    Initial estimates 12,000 souls dead and rising, plus over 1 million displaced or affected.

    I am watching horrific news footage from Sri Lanka, Aceh (Indonesia) and Thailand on TVRI Berita Pagi (Indonesian news service) & SBS.

    We are all one family of human beings - imagine it is your house, your brothers and sisters. I've lived in Indonesian archipelago for example and know how gentle, kind and loving these people are.

    Please help by donating here http://www.careaustralia.org.au/donate_now.asp, here http://www.redcross.org/, or another organisation who can assist.

    The average income in most of these places is just a few dollars a day (and often less) - so anything you do will help a lot!

    I live in a typically selfish and miserly 'first world' country that shares an embarassing 0.25% of GDP on foreign aid. Please help fellow citizens and our governments wake up to this so we can all live in a safer, more compassionate and peaceful world. Capitalism and free markets can only go so far - human life and the environment are priceless - and most valuable of all.

  205. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 0, Troll

    Assuming all else is equal, yes. My life (since I don't have a Ph.D. yet) would be worth less.

    It's possible to argue for this using a number of rather simple thought experiments, first persuading you that it is possible for two lifes to have different values, second persuading you that generally the better the person is (in any accepted regard), the more valuable his life is to rational people, and third, using this principle in a particular example.

    I know from experience that many people have a number of emotional blocks that prevent them from easily accepting this argument. I don't know how simple or difficult would that be for you, though.

    Of course, there are lot of side tasks as well, such as defining what "valuable" means, deciding who is qualified to make such decisions, etc.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  206. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All other things equal, a life of a less educated person is worth less than of a more educated one. To whom? By what possible standard?

    To me, level of education (which is mostly brainwashing and programming) is one of the least important aspects of a person. The two most important are (raw) intelligence and looks. A smart person can learn anything they want and be hyper-productive in that task. Someone with low intelligence can never be more than a trained monkey, maybe good at repetitive tasks but never innovative. Of course we all value good-looking people (of the opposite sex) whether we admit it or not. They are inherently valuable.

    When I think of this tragedy I imagine all the hot Asian chicks who may have perished needlessly. Their pretty bodies are of no good to us dead (mainly because they start to decay).

  207. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...clear lack of imagination. Huh. sounds like the sept. 11 report.

  208. This was just a warning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To all of you who may doubt the military supremacy of the United States of America, this was just a warning. The next time it will be far worse, affecting more than just coastal areas. This is just one of our newer weapon system tests. You shall all bow before us and swear your allegiance before our flag or you shall all drown in more of these "natural" disasters.

    Our goal is nothing short of complete unequivocal world domination. Your terms of surrender will not be negotiable. They will include abiding by the DMCA and all of our copyright laws as well as the establishment of the death penalty (without trial) for all alleged sexual activity or disrespect of our peace officers.

    You have been warned. The rest is up to you.

    [Note: the Japanese, Taiwanese, Chinese, Canadians, British, and French are excluded from this warning for various reasons]

  209. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know from experience that many people have a number of emotional blocks that prevent them from easily accepting this argument. I don't know how simple or difficult would that be for you, though.


    How very convenient :). Are you sure "emotional blocks" are not just your rationalizations for justifying to yourself why so many people disagree with you?

    You can certainly single out one specific criterion and asign a person's "value" according to that particular criterion, but I would immediately provide several other criteria incompatible with yours. Who is to say that yours is better than mine? For all we know I have Ph.D. and you don't :) How do you grade people? Color of their skin, color of their hair, Height? Intelligence?
    Strength? Beauty? How do you measure intelligence? Or beauty? If one has greater IQ than Feynman, does it mean his impact on the mankind will be larger? Was Feynman a great benefactor to mankind? Or he was a part of the team that created nuclear bomb that might ultimately destroy intelligent(your criterion) life as we know it? You must be a happy person if you know the answers.

    I have a feeling that you are, but nevertheless I would like to remind you that you are not the first to come up with the idea of proclaiming that some people are better than others. You would easily come up with numerous examples from history. From Sparta to Nazies to danila. Nazies, you know, also had very "scientifically" rationalized arguments about how some races (slavs, for example) are inferior to others (germans). You will probably agree with me that the underlying motive was "I am a german, and everyone who is not german is worth less". The rest was just rationalization. Are you sure you don't fall into the same trap? "I am intellectual, therefore everyoine who is not, is worth less?"

    You don't think that all similar theories in the course of history failed to find the magically absolutely undisputably correct criterion, and you came up with it?

    There is no single absolute criterion, of course, and there cannot be. People are not 1D objects, as you would seem to suggest.

  210. "only" 40-50 feet high? by triclipse · · Score: 1

    If you are claiming "only" 40 feet high, it is apparent you have never been caught inside by an ocean wave even half that size. The power of a normal, storm-created wave 40 feet high is simply awesome. Given the fact that storm waves travel at a fraction of the speed of tsunami, these waves must have been powerful indeed.

    --
    No Inflation Taxation without Representation
    1. Re:"only" 40-50 feet high? by zogger · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope you aren't assuming I am minimizing the serious nature of this devastation. I don't see where you get this impression from what I wrote. It's a bad scene, no ways about it, and my best wishes go out to the victims and their families. I was merely trying to allude to one of the recently talked about on slashdot speculated huge asteroid impacts with a projected tsunami 10 times larger, that it would be practically unimaginable in destructive force, from a recorded human history POV short of something like the Biblical "great flood" stories.

      As to waves of that size, no, my own personal experience with big water along those lines was three days in a 55 foot boat with "only" 25 foot swells and 70 knot winds, which was *dang spooky enough*, it came close to sinking the boat, and as it was, we had to beat feet to drydock once the storm subsided enough for us to make way safely for emergency repairs,and we took on enough seawater from a completely sprung plank below waterline to almost completely flood over the top of the detroit diesel v-12 in the engine room,despite the pumping efforts of the separate diesel powered bilge pump,and luckily it kept chugging along "liquid cooled" as it were. When we got to drydock (much slower than normal good speed) we were sitting in the water almost to the gunwales, and they were originally around 8 feet from waterline. In other words, a few hours from swamping, max. We lucked out bigtime. Had to stay firmly lashed to something the entire three days of the storm to keep from getting beat senseless, there was no walking around, etc, happening. You had to crawl and move a safety line from point to point.

      Of course I was a young fool then and thought "hey, adventure!" HAHAHAHAHA!

  211. sort of like how linux is a failure in the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome to real life, gnu hippies

  212. Most of us know someone who knows someone... by antispam_ben · · Score: 1
    who is directly and horribly affected by this.

    I heard about the quake on the news, but it felt different when I read the following on one of the mailing lists I'm on. Maybe someone has a good God that can loan Undine an Iridium phone or something similar for long enough to call home.


    Undine left Bangkok to travel to the south of Thailand just on Thursday. She
    called her mum yesterday, she was staying in a beach bungalow on the southern
    coast. I have spent the last 12 hours trying to get any word of her, to no
    avail.

    We don't know where she is, we are afraid and worried. If any of you have any
    prayers to send to her, please do. We don't know where she is, if she is well
    or injured or dead, and if nobody hears from me for a while, I might have to go
    find her.

    m

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  213. Re:Largest seismic event in 40 years (12,000+ dead by claudia · · Score: 1

    It's been revised upwards to a magnitute of 9.0 now. But, that's not my main point. I wish you hadn't made the above post as an AC. Yours has been one of the best made on this topic and you should let your fellow /.'s get to know you are.

    --
    civilization is chaos taking a rest
  214. Obvious response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Bush's fault! We all know it's true! Everything is Bush's fucking fault! You neofuckingcon bastards can suck my cock! I SEE the truth! It's all Bush's fault! How can 51% of America be so fucking stupid?! It's clearly Bush's fucking fault!

    With rationality like this, why did our side loose to Bush? IT'S BUSH'S FUCKING FAULT, THAT'S WHY!

    1. Re:Obvious response: by Optali · · Score: 1

      Yes, a very clever post, and of great interest for those of us /. users which comes from the UE, Asia or anywhere else.

      I seriously expect that you already made a donation. http://www.oxfam.co.uk or at the red cross. Thanks, now you can continue writing nonsense.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
  215. Re:How long until we blame America by wew · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's right: God is punishing Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand for a crime committed by a dozen Arabs in the north-eastern US, because he has no better grasp on geography, morality, or rationality than the red-necks who have such immediate insight into his intentions and workings.

  216. Bangladesh? by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 0


    The BBC's map of affected areas suggests that Bangladesh escaped damage.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/4126019.stm

    This seems odd, because Bangladesh is a notably low-lying country, in a river delta/flood plain, densely populated, and with a history of devastation by tsunamis and flooding.

    In 1991, apparently, 138,000 Bangladeshis were killed by a tsunami.

    If the BBC is correct, then it seems to be the only nation in the region that escaped serious damage.

    Anyone want to venture a guess as to why this would be?

    I hope this is true - the alternative explanation would be that the whole country was so completely wiped out that word never got out, and nobody else noticed them missing.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  217. Interesting News Coverage Pattern... by azmeith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I first heard about it close to 12:00M PST while surfing.

    What was interesting was the news coverage the next morning (disclaimer: I woke up at @ 9:00). Wolf Blitzer was going off about the 10 top news-worthy things in 04 (of course 9 of them had to do with the US), Paula Zahn went off about some reverend making boatloads of money off of G and there wasnt even an obligatory mention (screen-bottom tickers don't count) of an event that resulted in (unofficial) a deathtoll close to 11,500 (last BBC estimate). The only place I got to see anything about it on TV was an obscure (to me at least) channel called News World Intl. (366 on DirectTV) where CBC and then something called the German Journal talked about this most of the time. Of course the BBC was kind enough to provide a lo-rez video feed, but I still dont understand the complete glossing over of such an incident. Is it that unless americans die, the american media wont cover it? Seems foolhardy... but then it is the US. Nothing's unexpected. And of course I still dont know why the BBC World service is not available in the US.

    --
    Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous? -- Calvin (Bill Watterson)

    1. Re:Interesting News Coverage Pattern... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

      Newsworld is a Canadian news network funded by the tax payers. It is a wholey better source than most available in North America.

  218. Heh. Talk about exaggeration... by Behrooz · · Score: 1

    I'd say that's by far the most sensational article I could find on the subject, and the exaggeration in that article is exceeded only by the 'devastation reeked' by the author's command of grammar.

    Even a non-technical journalist should be expected to do better than reporting outcomes involving waves several times higher than the worst-case scenario considered in the relevant research.

    Admittedly, the prospect of the worst-case 20m tsunami hitting most of the East Coast is rather fearsome, but it also relies on a currently-inactive volcano triggering a ~500 cubic kilometer landslide.

    The estimate of the potential size of the landslide is based on very limited information. I'd say they're trolling for grant money, and it's certainly not something that most people should be worried about at this point.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  219. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, about 50% of people in northern sumatra province (indonesia) are Christians.

  220. Who cares if the above posts are redundant or not by BottleCup · · Score: 1

    I was surprised that the article did not mention anything about Malaysia. The Tsunami also affected 3 states in the north of Malaysia (Penang, Kedah and Perlis bordering Thailand) which are roughly 300 to 400 kilometers away from the epicenter.

    The death toll is estimated in the hundreds although at the time of writing there doesnt seem to be any official count. The aftershocks were felt as far down as Kuala Lumpur (600+ kilometers away from the epicenter and about 50 kilometers away from the coast).

    There were tremors felt as far away as Kuantan (700+ km from epicenter) which is on the east coast of the Malaysian peninsula facing the south china sea! Many hotels and apartment buildings were evacuated as a result of this.

  221. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Danila writes, " I must admit that I didn't follow the news very closely..."

    Enough said.

  222. More than death by mec · · Score: 1

    It's more than 14,000 deaths.

    It's millions of people homeless.

    Have you ever slept rough? I haven't, but I've come close enough to appreciate how bad it is.

    It's untold damage to water systems. That story hasn't come out yet.

    As to why it matters: these is a humans vs nature story. We humans use engineering to defend ourselves against the depredations of nature like this. When I read these stories, I think: if the people in Indonesia and Thailand and Myanmar and Bangladesh and India had better engineering, fewer lives would be lost and ruined.

    1. Re:More than death by danila · · Score: 1

      I was not objecting to those, who consider this an important event, I was objecting to those (posters in this thread), who claim that the loss of life is somehow horrible and to those, who moderated such posts to 4-5, despite these posts having no useful content.

      You are of course, completely correct about several important implications of the cataclysm. Congratulations for being rational in the face of disaster. Are you an engineer yourself? That would explain a lot.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    2. Re:More than death by mec · · Score: 1

      Since you ask, yes, I'm a software engineer.

      And I live in New York City, which gives me a little appreciation for death and disaster.

      With respect, I think you've been making some of your points badly. You've been saying "10,000 people died, but that's not important, because lots more people die from other things." Try this instead: "20,000 people died, and millions more are homeless, and millions more are at increased risk from disease. And that's an epic tragedy. But look at this: another 15,000 people are dying every day from protein-energy malnutrition. Reputable Link. That's a big problem, too."

      That is, if you want to offer a radical critique, it helps to start by acknowledging the validity of the conventional wisdom, and then going beyond it.

      Errr, I'm preaching at you. Anyways, that's my two cents and my soapbox.

  223. I took the wave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was surfing. I took the wave. I'm alive. No choice. Bye Dudes

  224. Undersea Cables by Ranger · · Score: 1

    I know it's morbid curiosity, but I wonder if this disaster has affected the communication systems used for call centers in India. Do they use satellite? undersea cables? Do they come from the east or the west? (I'm too lazy to look it up at the moment) Even if the lines are not physically affected I suspect the traffic on them has skyrocketed.

    As time goes by the destructive force of earthquakes, volcanoes and storms are unlikely to change, but what has changed and changing is the increasing number of people that can be affected by such events.

    It'll be days before we know the true cost in human lives not to mention economically. The estimates of dead keep going up, but I wouldn't be surprised if it goes down. One can only hope. With so many people living on the edge in Southeast Asia, literally, it'll be a long time before many of the areas recover.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  225. Re:GOD PUNISHING ISLAM? by thisgooroo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    too bad you weren't right in the path of the tsunami. it would have considerably improved the IQ of both the world and your country. you might want to check out the predominant religions in the hardest hit countries

  226. Enough about A.C.C. by roseblood · · Score: 1

    .... what I want to know about..are these Quake and Tsunami games that were so much more devestaing than DOOM?

    Well, at least I've heard of Quake before...

    --
    There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  227. Hope they had their scuba gear on.. when by Gopal.V · · Score: 1

    Hope they had their scuba gear on when the Big one came ...

    Don't worry - they'll be back .. especially if they were on an economy package which puts you around 2-3 kms away from the beach.

    Only the Really Rich and the Really Poor can live on the beach :)

  228. tragedy and disaster - mind the difference by Gopal.V · · Score: 1

    Just because it happened to the cream of America's corporate structure doesn't make 9/11 horrifying... It's not the body count ... It was not a tragedy - it was an act of malicious intent by a group of people - who had to kill thousands of people to be taken seriously !!. That's what's HORRIFYING about it.

    The relative significance of human tragedies are indeed ranked by the percentage of human population wiped out. A life is a life , no matter who they are (primitive savages or corporate executives). If you want to compare the Tungska meteorite with the flash tide flood in Chennai - I'd think the latter deserves more of our concern ...

    As a species , we should grieve the loss of valuable genetic diversity - It's something that comes naturally to any creature of sufficent intelligence (look at some elephants in Periyar , they literally cry over year old bones).

  229. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 1

    I know these are emotional blocks, because I can clearly see that the reaction to my arguments is irrational and coincides with an excited emotional state. People don't take what I say clamly, but instead offer completely irrational rebuttals such as "Hitler would surely agree" and stuff. :) I'm not saying your metion of the Nazis means you are incapable of rational thought, just that it's (a) typical (b) badly thought argument.

    I wanted you to agree first that it's possible to judge the worthiness (value) of people, who only differ in one particular respect. That's the necessary step. For example, that I would be less valuable/less worthy if I didn't have a Ph.D. and you did, all else being equal.

    Assuming you agreed with that, we could proceed to the next step - arguing that it's often possible to confidently judge who is more valuable out of two people, who are different in several respects. Here is the gist of the argument:
    a) we can't always make a perfectly correct decision, but we can often be reasonably sure, although there are cases where we can't decide
    b) we can't take into account every minute of their lives, but this doesn't make our judgements completely worthless
    c) the list of relevant qualities and their weights are determined using expert estimates, where any intelligent, rational and ethical person is an expert
    d) even though seveal "experts" would likely provide two different lists and different weights for qualities, there are many cases (see (a)) where all of them will make the same decision
    e) it's not necessary in practice to provide quantitative metrics of people's qualities in order to judge them. You can say that Claudia Schiffer is more beautiful than some dirty crackwhore from the gutter without using a "beautymeter". Even though you can't easily compare her with, say, Halle Berry

    A good illustration is valuing the material objects. Can you say "Painting A is better than painting B" (or "computer A is better than computer B")? Yes, there are painting that you can't compare, but there are some that you can.

    With humans we can start with Hitler (why not?) and Ghandi. Can you say one is more valuable (worthy) than another? Of course, you can be stubborn and insist that you can't say that, but I think you, just like any reasonable person, would agree that we can compare those two. Then we should move to more interesting real-life pairs and conclude that there actually is a possibility of comparing two people's values. We probably can't judge controversial people (Feynman's involvement in the Manhattan project was, IMO, sufficiently small to make him "not evil enough" to be controversial), but most of people aren't really very controversial.

    The third step is to understand that even when we can't compare individual people because we lack the necessary information, we can still make probabilistical estimates of who would be more valuable. That is the same as comparing a number of people from one sample with a number of people from another sample.

    After that we are all set. The lemmas "proven" (or at least agreed upon) above are sufficient to make the final statement - that those who died in this disaster are probably less valuable on average than (for example) the same number of people who live in Holland.

    It's worth noting that while there may be many human classification schemes that are wrong, that does not preclude the possibility of there being some good schemes. Of course, if you develop a good scheme, for obvious reasons it won't be applicable to every pair of humans. But it should still probably work well enough for many pairs.

    I am also not suggesting in any way that humans can all be plotted on one axis. What I am saying is that for every combination of a pair humans and a valid classification scheme there exists a value between 0 and 1, which is a probability of a given scheme saying that person A is more valuable than person B. And for certain pairs of people a sufficiently large number of valid classification schemes have corresponding values close enough to 1 (or a sufficiently large number have values close to 0). Hope this isn't too complicated for you. Assuming you have a Ph.D. in physics it shouldn't be.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  230. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by hughk · · Score: 1
    The real issue is with a warning net, those closest will be able to warn those further away. Even if an Indian based seismologist observes something, the difference between the earthquake and the tsunami wouldn't be so big. It would be better to have a waring net like the Pacific, but the Pacific rim is much more active.

    A scientist will be able to recognise that a dangerous event has ocurred. I guess the real problem is who does the scientist call to ensure that word is spread. You are quite right about bureacracy, as there need to be a system that ensures reports are taken seriously and acted upon.

    Unlike the Pacific, the Bay of Bengal/Anderman sea is much less active, and this was practically the only major fault. India is still prone to some earthquakes (major plate boundary in the North), but these are not undersea.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  231. Re:sort of like how linux is a failure in the mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome to real life, gnu hippies

    Ah. You're one of those "Reaganesque rugged individuals", aren't you? A John Wayne wannabe? With fists of steel and diamonds in your eyes?

    Bwaaaaahahaaahhaahaaahaaa!

    My role is to be a bomb-throwing anarchist; the neural configuration was more suited for such an egregore.

  232. Some knew well in advance that it was coming by rnet · · Score: 1

    What is so mysterious about the earthquake and the subsequent tidal wave? Cannot it be predicted earlier and the people be warned of it? Could necessary precautions be taken to minimise the loss to life and property? In fact, the quake was actually predicted by a team of research scholars of the Department of Applied Geology, University of Madras, with a permissible error, a week ago.

    N Venkatanathan, research scholar, who is currently undergoing a Ph.D programme in Predicting Earthquake and Aseismic Construction Designing and the man behind the team working on predictions, said he had already presented a report about the Indonesian earthquake on 22 December to members of the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi.

    The 15-member team headed by S K Tandan were in Chennai at that time for a meeting.

    Venkatanathan, said, 'we predicted that the disaster will occur on 26 December 2004 at 00:30 (GMT) with 3.54 N latitude and 97.17E longitude, which is located near the coast of Banyak Island, Sumatra, Indonesia, with a magnitude at around 6 to 7. The actual calamity occurred on 26 December 2004 at 00:58 (GMT), with 3.298 N latitude and 95.779 E longitude, located off the west coast of northern Sumatra'.

    Read the story here
    http://newstodaynet.com/27DEC/SS6.HTM/

  233. No Problem, Paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes thanks, I think I will definitely call you paranoid: If you look at a world map, you may notice that Aceh is pretty far from China. Pretty damn far.

    And even if you think Indonesia is capable of becoming a world power, Aceh is not where you would want to strike. You would want to *strengthen* the Acehnese insurgency then.

    And both those scenarios are only if you think electro-seismo-whatever weapons are actually possible. They probably aren't, or the intelligent people here on slashdot would be having a discussion of how they work.

    So yeah, you are definitely insanely paranoid. Thanks for the permission to call you that. :-)

  234. Re:I feel for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Devastated social life??

    In my experience quakes are pretty good for the social life. Societies come together in the face of trauma like that. Where were you?

  235. Re:This is Geek news? by krenskeoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In a reply to both siblings. You are probably right, this is not specifically geek news. Maybe we should alter the story tital to "Tidal waves seek out and kills hundreds of computer users and destroy thousands of computers. Oh and 20000 poor people died." No that would be too cynical.

    My main point though is wether or not the incident is natural or man made the story matters. The geek side comes in all over. This will probably see major tech spending on new facilities and warning systems. New research into quake prediction (if the Indian scientist was correctly predicting to within a short distance and less than a half hour then someone is about to throw money at him). There was likely a number of readers of slashdot killed by this ( with a million+ readers, someone was almst certainly in the area ). Geeks also dig, big natural disasters like volcanoes earthquakes etc, so that makes it geeky as well. Good grief the ultimate geek bit is the fact a worker from the special effects team of the LOTR's was in the area and unheard from so far.

    Now as to the apple and oranges excuse as to why 911 was news for geeks (with numerous articles spread over weeks) and this isn't. I personally think it is pretty close to nationalist relativism or possibly even racism. Complaining about one story on a big disaster (which is at least 8 times worse in lives lost and 500 times worse in people directly effected and probably 5 times worse in monetary damage) while trying to justify the stories about a smaller disaster ( with just as little geekiness) appears simply wrong, and suggests ulterior motives.

  236. Re:Who cares if the above posts are redundant or n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news, tech support is closed!

  237. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "all else being equal"

    Although assumptions can simpify the construction of model or theory, too many assumptions would just made the model/theory useless -- you can't use it to explain the real world.

  238. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 1

    This assumption is just the first step. People hold wrong beliefs about the world. One such common belief is that you can't say that one person is better (more valuable, more worthy) than another. This is wrong, but to demonstrate that it is necessary to use this simplier model.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  239. by the same measure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    COMEDY = Violence to you
    TRAGEDY = Violence to me

    1. Re:by the same measure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! It's:
      LIBERATION = Violence to you
      TRAGEDY = Violence to me

  240. Re:GOD PUNISHING ISLAM? by vision33r · · Score: 1

    Well, Islam is an older religion so perhaps.. the Gods have tallied up enough crimes for this disaster to happen.. Wait until the God is done counting the crimes committed by Christianity.. I just hope I am not punished accidentally for being an atheist.

  241. Home video of the wave crashing in by concreationist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here is a home video of the wave crashing into the beach of Patong.

    --
    ...what if there were no rhetorical questions?
    1. Re:Home video of the wave crashing in by Macfox · · Score: 1

      Please mod the parent up. Excellent video showing scale of the waves force.

      --
      Area51 - We are watching...
  242. Why an earthquake and not a celestial body ? by thrill12 · · Score: 1
    I wonder this, because I read in a different thread that the 2004MN4 would be in the same range of Mt destruction-power.

    Who can explain to me why the evidence that is available does not without any doubt leave open the option of this being a meteorite impact ? Wouldn't it present with the exact same things:

    Tsunami

    Earthquake like effects

    Sudden onset ???

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Why an earthquake and not a celestial body ? by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

      Meteorites don't have aftershocks. Also consider that it occurred on the boundary of the Indian-Australian continental plate days after an 8.1 earthquake occurred on an opposite edge of the same plate. (That one caused no damage.) No meteors capable of causing this were, to my knowledge, reported.

      According to the USGS, the pattern of aftershocks indicated 1000 km of the plate boundary had slipped. It would be extremely unlikely for the results of a meteorite to look that coherently like an earthquake.

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    2. Re:Why an earthquake and not a celestial body ? by dzarn · · Score: 1

      First, there have been NO reports of anything in the sky, such as a fireball, which would be seen, especially in a populous area such as India.

      Second, the seismic signature is very different between an earthquake & an asteroid. If you know how to read them, a seismometer can show the difference between a diesel pickup and an 18 wheeler driving nearby. An earthquake would show slippage of the faults (several seconds long) while an asteroid would be a sudden impact. Sort of the difference between sliding a stone across a hard floor, and dropping it straight down. See the difference?

  243. It's past 22,000 dead now. :-( by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    And they still haven't reached the hardest hit areas on the other islands of the Maldives and a couple of islands belonging to India just west of Myanmar (Burma).

  244. Re:In.... by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > Not only that, but it should have been modded down anyway for being in bad taste.

    No, it should not. "Taste" is purely subjective. Your initial analysis was correct, though.

  245. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your scheme is unnecessarily complicated: The number of people is finite, and therefore you can certainly order them. The question is how and why?

    Returning to your "proof", step one already contains logical flaws: you can propose a scheme for the people who differ in one respect, but it would not be accepted by all people, and it would sure as hell would not mean anything. Two people who differ only by color of their hair. Who is more valuable? If your answer is they are equal, then please realize that the vast majority of people on Earth would not actually care if one has Ph.D. or not just like you don't care about the color of their hair. I certainly don't when I judge people. Just because you don't have it yet, and you surround PhD with a magical aura, it is just a piece of paper.

    You can say "painting A is better than B" only within a certain context and if we agreed on criteria. Is Black Square a good painting? Many people seem to think so. Do you think the modern abstract art would be appreciated by art experts in 17th or 18th centuries?

    Same with computers: you can say that A is better than B only within specific context. If you are alone on an uninhabited island, you need a hammer and all you have is a computer, then the relevant criteria certainly different from what you meant to suggest. This is exagerration, but you can certainly think of many other examples.

    Same with Hitler and Ghandi, you and I can agree that Ghandi is more valuable, but then again, there are many who would not.

    Replace "Feynman" with "Oppenheimer" or any other physicist you think played essential role in Manhatten project.

    What do you do when some classification schemes put a person close to 0, while others put him close to 1? Again, returning to Nazies: they certainly would put Hitler very close to 1, while you seem to think that he is close to 0. Or, take many Jewish scientists, musicians, doctors etc. Nazies would place them close to 0, would you?
    Do you seriously think that classifications schemes for an average arab are the same as for an average american?

    By now we have spent too much time on this argument, and I don't see a reason to continue.
    You seem to have a classification scheme that you think is representative for a certain class of "rational" people. You are convinced that according to your scheme you are near the top of the food chain and due to your education you are very important to humanity. I don't see any reason to argue otherwise.I just don't understand why is it useful, and why everybody else should care about it.

  246. I thought about you a lot yesterday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought a lot about you yesterday.
    I am sure that your on line free encyclopedia is wonderful and all.

    However, I still feel that you should temper your posts and respect the tone of the topic.

    You say that your signature is always to go to this particular website. I think you are not being honest, though please correct me if I am wrong.

    It seems to be that you must have cooked up a way to use mod points to self-promote, which I am sure makes you very cleaver. And I appluad you.

    However, it does not get past the point that your post contributed nothing to the discussion except to compel people to use your site.

    Also, I really doubt that you have always used the signature that you say you had because it would always be the same, instead of always including a mention of the topic at hand.

    So, I don't want to start a war with you, but only hope that you will realize how tasteless it is to always see the self-promotion of such sites as yours always on slash-dot.

    If you had written anything real or posted your encyclopedia's entry here, then that would be fine that your signature directs people to that site. However, admit it, you didn't have anything to say. It was just what you say is your signature.

    My quess is that you have a spider that always checks for the topic and creates your post.

    And I find it curious that you are always modded up as informative. You provided no information but just a link. Don't you think anyone could just google 'tsumani' and get to your site?

    So can you understand how this can bother me?

    The whole world should not always be about self-promotion.
    Modesty is a better policy.
    Best of luck with your on-line encyclopedia.

    But please, when there is real human tragedy, do you have to always make it about your site?

    It reminds me of when I put 'human slave' into Alta Vista and it spit back:
    'Buy human slaves at '

    Best of luck with your marketting, but try compassion and not so much shameless promotion. ;)

  247. Re:A drop in the sea by danila · · Score: 0, Troll

    I just don't understand why is it useful, and why everybody else should care about it.

    Nobody has to care about it, it's just a simple explanation of why I am justified in saying "Those 2000 people lived in shitty houses, so it's likely their deaths is no big deal on the planetary scale".

    You can play with the logic all day long, but in the end I don't think a significant number of Terrans would say "It'd better we had this earthquake in the North Sea instead so that an equivalent number of Swedes, Brittons and Dutch died".

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  248. Nonsense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The likelihood of this happening in that part of the world was tremendously small, add to that the magnitude (I truly think you don;t understand what a 8.9 in the Richter scale truly means) and we have one in a millions chances of such horrendous thing happening.

    To invest too much preventing an unlikely event is foolish.

    In spite of that, the goverments in the region were looking into an alert system, having said that it would have saved nobody in Thailand, Indonesia or Malaysia given the closeness of the epicenter.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  249. Kemosabee..... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If we don't measure somehow tragedies (body count is a hell of a good estimate, since at least is measuring the human impact) then we can't know the size of the necessary response.

    You may find it sickening, but it is necessary to get organized.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Kemosabee..... by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      If we don't measure somehow tragedies (body count is a hell of a good estimate, since at least is measuring the human impact) then we can't know the size of the necessary response.

      Good point, but I was addressing attacks on personal grief - not impersonal responses by Relief Organizations (which certainly do need such scales for *internal* purposes).

  250. Some people are born brain dead..... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If their work is to warn about tsunamis in the Pacific basin, with all due respect that frankly you don't deserve, why should they warn about tsunamis somewhere else?

    Ditto with early warning systems for earthquakes, tornados, flooding, etc. They had a job to do, they did it well, and it is only uninformed nitpickers (rated as "informative") that find fault on this....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Some people are born brain dead..... by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      I agree with your subject line...

      If their work is to warn about tsunamis in the Pacific basin, [...] why should they warn about tsunamis somewhere else?

      Because they knew about it, and it could have saved lives?

      In fact, the latest I read is that they actually did try to warn, so they are not total bureaucratic morons like you seem to be.

      But they didn't know whom to call (!), they had no contact in their (Outlook?) address book. But they still tried, and apparently warned the US state department, which in turn didn't know whom to call. Not a surprise that the US state department has no clue on how to reach foreign officials, since it's the Pentagon which is now responsible for foreign relations...

      Sad world...

  251. I think the number is 6. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I believe some mathematicians demonstrated that the longest chain necessary of people that know each other between you and any other person in the world would have 6 people at most.

    In my case I have the following chains:

    Me - dad - his boss - President of Mexico (1960) - John F. Kennedy.

    Or a shorter one:

    Me - University teacher (in Mexico City) - Noam Chomsky...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  252. Re:A drop in the sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As opposed to significant number of Terrans saying
    otherwise? Don't forget to include in your poll Indians and Chinese.

  253. What about ... by cobyrne · · Score: 1

    "We don't have contacts in our address book for anybody in that part of the world."

    What about ... the American Embassy in the affected countries?!?!

  254. Re:Oh, STFU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and that 'aid' includes cheap windows licences and all. Just fantastic. Why don't we include the Iraq war as aid while we're at it?

    Really, the amount of aid the US gives is nothing special compared to other western countries.

    (I love the US, but please, stop lying to show how good we are)

  255. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by Julia+Cameron · · Score: 1
    • Because I read somewhere that only vertical movement in the ocean causes tsunamis, that not all quakes in the ocean cause tsunamis. But, not sure about this...

    A large asteroid crashing into the ocean would cause a tsunami. (Think of the rings of water when you toss a pebble into a pond.) An underwater volcanic eruption could cause a tsunami. Tsunamis are caused by displacement.

    --
    Julia Cameron
    Oich ù agus hiùraibh éile
  256. Re:A drop in the sea by B4RSK · · Score: 1

    danila (69889): OK, so 10000 people died. Big fucking deal.

    It's not just the death toll, which seems likely to rise beyond 100,000. It's the total destruction of infrastructure and housing, the injuries, the loss of livelihood, the diseases that will follow with so many dead. The deaths are a tragedy, but the survivors are the ones who must now go through hell.

    To be succinct: You're a fucked in the head sociopathic asshole. Seek help.

    --
    Some people are like slinkies--basically useless but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
  257. Maldives and Seychelles OK? by KayakFun · · Score: 1
    The Seychelles have three islands with mountains, for the rest the Maldives and Seychelles islands are 1-2m high, which could be totally overrun by waves higher than the island.

    They are not mentioned anywhere, because communication equipment is swept into the sea, or because nothing happened? I'm interested because I went on holiday in the Seychelles a few years ago. It's a beautiful place with friendly people.

    Does anybody have any news on these island nations?

  258. Re:A drop in the sea by B4RSK · · Score: 1

    danila (69889): But there is no reason to care about 10000 dead, because this is not news at all. Especially since most of the people killed are probably uneducated simple-minded folks, who lived in shitty houses.

    It has been said by many that the character of a man can be most easily understood by how he treats those who he considers beneath himself.

    It's true.

    I hope you can overcome your apparent sociopathic illness and learn compassion.

    --
    Some people are like slinkies--basically useless but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
  259. Agreed! by B4RSK · · Score: 1

    AC: What I hate most about the evangelist moron wing of the christian faith is that they cant be bothered to even understand their own faith

    Couldn't agree more. The only thing I'd like to add is that extremists from other religions are the same -- Islam is not a violent religion like the extremist nutcases make out to be either.

    --
    Some people are like slinkies--basically useless but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
  260. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite "blame-America" argument so far goes like this: The U.S. gives only a small amount of its GDP in foreign aid. The the Netherlands, they give 10 times as much.

    What a load of crap! The U.S. is in fact the largest dollar donor in the world. The reason we don't go by GDP is that the US is very, very opposed to taxation (unlike the EU, which is largely socialist). And this does not even begin to count the amount of private donations (enabled by low taxes) that are not counted in government spending.

    Note that the people who are complaining about the amount of U.S. aid are large bureaucracies, like UNICEF. Of course they want more "taxes", since UNICEF's gets to spend the money, and the American government has to pay.

    Instead, what the U.S. does is give the largest amount worldwide in dollars of any country. AND since taxes are low, many, many citizens donate private monies to charities that they support. (Sorry, I don't throw my money away on large bureaucratic EU-style charities. I give to small groups where (a) the spending budgets are public, unlike UNICEF, and (b) most of the money goes to help others, instead paying New York salaries for UNICEF workers.

  261. Maldives hit hard, Seychelles hit but not as hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google News is your friend ...

    Google News for Maldives
    Google News for Seychelles

  262. Ironic comment on Clarke Foundation's Web Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From www.clarkefoundation.org/projects, regarding "Project Warn", which the Clarke Foundation participates in:

    "The purpose of Project Warn is combine enhanced communications and IT systems to provide warning of impending natural or man-made disasters and to provide on-going communications and remote sensing and GIS support during disaster relief operations. The Clarke Foundation is working ...to carry out a suitable test and demonstration in this area. In particular a simulation and test is being planned in the Pacific Region in 2005 to determine to how to use the latest information and sensing technology more effectively in the advent of that a major Tsunami might impact an Asian country or island. Clarke Foundation personnel are providing technical advice and support on a volunteer basis to this project."

  263. Indian Blogger Unite for Tsunami Help by sanspeak · · Score: 1

    Some Indians and other south asian bloggers have formed a blog tsunamihelp.blogspot.com which provides the latest information on the mishap, agencies involved in support of victims, helpline numbers and places where donations can me made.

  264. A solution to the problem of evil by evbergen · · Score: 1

    Well, if only one could exist...

    About the philosophical problem of evil though; I think it's possible to postulate a God who is omniscient, omnipotent and compassionate at the same time, by introducing the concept of voluntary non-interference with the freedom to choose of humans and the customs (some call them laws) of nature.

    The question is really, if God knows all and can do all, why didn't He intervene? I think the answer is, he can, but often the order of nature and our freedom is worth more to him than the disasters that happen.

    If as a species we only could be saved by God taking away our freedom of choice and reducing us to mere angels, who have no choice but to obey God, then that would be pretty sad, and I for one am rather human, despite all the suffering that occurs due to human actions, than a creature that lacks the unique responsibility that comes with this life.

    Cheers,

    Emile.

    --
    All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
  265. tsunami video by nodnarb1978 · · Score: 1

    Video here; high bandwidth server, no worries. 4 different videos. Amazing footage.

  266. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by northcat · · Score: 1

    Yeah, those are all vertical movements. Do all earthquakes (in the ocean) cause tsunamis?

  267. Mods on crack, as usual by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0
    In questionable taste? Maybe.
    Vulgar? Certainly.
    Funny? Not hilarious, but whatever.
    Obvious? Possibly.
    Troll? No fucking way Jose.

    I suppose modding like a twat will show how sincere your pain is. Bleeding heart? Bleeding arse more like.

    --
    1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
  268. Re:Never trust standardized test analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I know it happened, and by now the bodycount is even higher (60000 last I heard). I even know that geologists suspected that this might happen at some time. But the problem still remains: how much are you going to invest into a warning system that is not going to happen again in your lifetime? I have no idea how much it will cost to set up and maintain such a warning system, but whatever it is, it is not available for other needs that probably are more immediate (poverty fighting). Afaik, the last event that was as disastrous in this area was 120 years ago. Most likely the next time will be about as far away. Are you prepared to spend whatevcer it takes to save let's say 100000 then when the same funds could prevent 1000000 from starving in the meantime?



    btw, something similar could happen in the North Atlantic as well, but the last time it happened was 1755 (Lisbon earthquake, 60000 victims), i.e. 250 years ago. How much would you be willing to spend because something like that could happen again?

  269. Re:How long until we blame America by loraksus · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt other Christians would share your view.

    Sigh. . . You're quite wrong. Kind of sad really.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  270. Update, Undine is okay! by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    I thought I'd post an update.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  271. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, that would explain Cyclone Tracy, 1974 Christmas Day that devastated Darwin. Hotbed of heathens, them Aussies.

    It must be because of the name of the city...

  272. Re:This is Geek news? Well ... by Julia+Cameron · · Score: 1

    No.

    --
    Julia Cameron
    Oich ù agus hiùraibh éile
  273. Any chance this was an Asteroid Impact? by KJSwartz · · Score: 1

    I've searched the various seismic databases and noticed the beachball plot of the 9.0 magnitude earthquake was inverted from large magnitude earthquakes.

    Can anyone identify a seismograph plot of an actual asteroid impact? Both Torsional and Compressional plots would be quite useful (T-wave and P-Waves).