Slashdot Mirror


Episode III Opening Crawl Released

moggyf writes "The official Star Wars website has revealed the opening crawler text for Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith, currently scheduled for a May 19th, 2005 release."

609 comments

  1. Okay, did anyone else.... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... click on this article and get "Nothing to see here, move along..."?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Okay, did anyone else.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a-yup.

    2. Re:Okay, did anyone else.... by Basehart · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder if with all the last minute stuff going on at Lucas Film right now, whether anyone would notice if they forgot to make the opening titles crawl up the screen and just stuck that gif up there by accident.

      That would really put a dent in the look and feel of Star Wars III.

    3. Re:Okay, did anyone else.... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I see this about once a day from the RSS feed. Are you coming in via the frontpage?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Okay, did anyone else.... by serutan · · Score: 1

      I got that on another story a few minutes ago. Seems to be a glitch.

      Strangely, I also felt a slight tingling sensation behind my eyes and had a sudden urge to open a Vonage account and sign up for RackSpace hosting.

  2. /me hands over the nails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....for the coffin.

  3. In Case Of Slashdotting by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
    In case of slashdotting, here's the original GIF:

    47 49 46 38 49 61 35 02 DC 02 C4 00 00 E0 E0 E0
    F0 F0 F0 10 10 10 D0 D0 D0 A0 A0 A0 30 30 30 20
    20 20 90 90 90 60 60 60 50 50 50 70 70 70 B0 B0
    B0 40 40 40 80 80 80 C0 C0 C0 00 00 00 FF FF FF
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 21 F9 04
    00 00 00 00 00 2C 00 00 00 00 35 02 DC 02 00 05
    FF 20 04 8E 64 69 9E 68 AA AE 6C EB BE 70 2C CF

    [Lameness Filter encountered. Post aborted.]

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:In Case Of Slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant! Funniest laugh-out-loud post I've seen on /. in ages. Cheers.

    2. Re:In Case Of Slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your gif is busted.

      for i in 47 49 46 38 49 61 35 02 DC 02 C4 00 00 00 E0 E0 F0 F0 F0 10 10 10 D0 D0 D0 A0 A0 A0 30 30 30 20 20 20 90 90 90 60 60 60 50 50 50 70 70 70 B0 B0 B0 40 40 40 80 80 80 C0 C0 C0 00 00 00 FF FF FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 21 F9 04 00 00 00 00 00 2C 00 00 00 00 35 02 DC 02 00 05 FF 20 04 8E 64 69 9E 68 AA AE 6C EB BE 70 2C CF; do printf "\x$i"; done > busted.gif

    3. Re:In Case Of Slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what he ment was this :

      for i in 47 49 46 38 39 61 10 00 0F 00 80 01 00 00 00 00 FF FF FF 2C 00 00 00 00 10 00 0F 00 00 02 2A 84 8F 69 C1 ED BE 5E 00 32 C2 F9 6C A3 14 F6 FB 31 DA C4 85 1A 87 45 6A BA A5 E8 28 92 98 D4 AE B4 BB 85 B1 7C 67 CA 7F 28 00 00 3B; do printf "\x$i"; done > busted.gif

      much more optimized if i do say so myself...

  4. In case of /.ing by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1, Funny

    "it was the best of times, it was the worst of times..."

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:In case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times ... 'blurst' of times? You stupid monkey!"

  5. Thank goodness for the Internet by Staplerh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe this means that I'll see the Opening Crawl for Episode III before that poor bloke who started camping out in front of the theatre about a month ago!

    --
    "There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all."
    - Bob Dylan
  6. Oh Dear. by bburton · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just pissed my pants from excitement.

    --
    Slashdot = ((Technology + Politics) / Trolls) % Grammar Nazis
    1. Re:Oh Dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      This disorder may explain your problem with the ladies.

    2. Re:Oh Dear. by PoopJuggler · · Score: 0

      I just pissed my pants, but for an entirely different reason...

  7. General Grievous? by 10Ghz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    *sigh*

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    1. Re:General Grievous? by Xpilot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, he's the 2nd cousin twice removed of General Protection Fault.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:General Grievous? by pezpunk · · Score: 1

      hahaha! you took my post =(

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    3. Re:General Grievous? by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


      And his thugs Sergent Bodily and Captain Harm.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:General Grievous? by LEgregius · · Score: 1

      I think he just showed us, but then, that may just be scratching the surface.

    5. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, THAT is funny.

    6. Re:General Grievous? by artemis67 · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's related to Major Fubar, isn't he?

    7. Re:General Grievous? by UWC · · Score: 4, Funny

      And Colonel Panic. Or something.

    8. Re:General Grievous? by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So I'm guessing that you're one of those people that 25 years ago said, "Skywalker? How cheesy is that? Does he even think he's a native-American tribal hero?"

      Or are we again doomed to a thread where all that is holy and righteous was that which was Star Wars 4, 5, and 6. :-p

    9. Re:General Grievous? by dstewart · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the Star Wars Databank:

      "General Grievous was developed for Episode III as a powerful new villain on the side of the Confederacy. The initial instructions that Director George Lucas gave the Art Department were very open-ended: "a droid general." From that vague direction, the artists developed a lot of explorations, some purely mechanical, some not, for the look of General Grievous."

      He can be seen here engaged in heated battle with Earthworm Jim.

      --
      Not every argument requires reduction to absurdity.
    10. Re:General Grievous? by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm surrounded by assholes!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:General Grievous? by eln · · Score: 1

      MAybe he's portrayed as a tragic figure. I mean, come on, with a name like that, he's obviously doomed from birth to be a bad guy in a cheesy sci-fi film.

    12. Re:General Grievous? by jcostantino · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't his son Corporal Punishment?

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    13. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's his movie (for children, by the way). You don't own it. You're not obligated to watch it. Stop whining.

    14. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6 coasted for a long time of the surprise of 4, and the strength of 5. In RotJ all that really stands up are parts of the final space battle, and the scout bike chase.

    15. Re:General Grievous? by Khakionion · · Score: 2, Funny

      And nephew to Constable Flagrant System Error.

      --
      OMG! Wau!
    16. Re:General Grievous? by jcostantino · · Score: 1
      I dunno... Personally I'm not even a huge fan of Star Wars, especially not episodes 1-3 but c'mon now... How hard is it to come up with good character names? Isn't there a series of books about this?

      The General Grievous reference makes me think of the Lemony Snickett books with their cheesy alliteration names that describe the character of the person in the name itself.

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    17. Re:General Grievous? by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      "No one mourns the wicked .."

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    18. Re:General Grievous? by Bigthecat · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "General Grievous was developed for Episode III as a powerful new villain on the side of the Confederacy. The initial instructions that Director George Lucas gave the Art Department were very open-ended: "a droid general." From that vague direction, the artists developed a lot of explorations, some purely mechanical, some not, for the look of General Grievous."

      One would think that 'vague direction' and 'a lot of explorations' would come up with something innovative. But, as can be seen from the picture, what do we have?

      A droid, in the shape and likliness of a human, holding two lightsabers. I mean honestly! Put it together with the name 'General Grievous' (What is his taunt going to be? 'I HAVE A GRIEVANCE WITH YOU!!')

      And along with that, what shade of bullshit are they going to come up with for the reason a Jedi can't pull the cord out of it's head and disable it? Arrrgh!

      To think of the fine Star Wars books that could have been made with this money...

    19. Re:General Grievous? by ackthpt · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      My god, how fucking stupid can Lucas get?

      Star Wars is sci-fi Lite

      Haven't you figured that out by now? It's the sort even a 5 year old can follow.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    20. Re:General Grievous? by theridersofrohan · · Score: 1
      Coloner Mustard?


      I'll still see it though. *double sigh*

    21. Re:General Grievous? by OleMoudi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every time some little detail about Episode III is revealed, people is always looking for catastrophical flaws at first sight and flashbacking to episode I.

      Seriously guys, if you try hard enough, you can easily see flaws in almost everything, even in the old trilogy. Try to imagine yourselves writing an opening crawler for episode III that couldn't be in some way criticised for any stupid elitist star wars zealot.

      Don't bury the movie till you see it

      --
      ---------
      Thinking never hurt anybody --MacGyver
    22. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be Kernal Panic?

    23. Re:General Grievous? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, hello Captain Obvious.

    24. Re:General Grievous? by putch · · Score: 1

      there needs to be a +1 irony modifier

      --
      just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
    25. Re:General Grievous? by UWC · · Score: 1

      I assume you meant "kernel," but no: my intent was to provide the homophone "colonel" since it is a military rank and the accepted pronunciations of the two words are pretty much identical.

    26. Re:General Grievous? by cflorio · · Score: 1

      Keep Firing, Assholes!

    27. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Didn't Private Parts serve under him?

    28. Re:General Grievous? by bombadillo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My god, how fucking stupid can Lucas get?

      He can be as stupid as he wants. Just as long as we keep flocking to see his movies and making him millions...

    29. Re:General Grievous? by de1orean · · Score: 1

      all that is holy and righteous was that which was Star Wars 4, 5, and 6.

      couldn't have said it better myself.

    30. Re:General Grievous? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      He's supposed to be a droid. I mean there's millions of them - someone's gotta name them. In a hypothetical situation, it may have went something like this: "Steve", "Bob", "Jerry", "Grevis", "Butthead", "Aw fuck, I'm taking a break".

      Grevis' name was misspelled but he became an honoured general later on. Fuck was taunted all through school, while I'm created confusion for generations to come.

    31. Re:General Grievous? by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

      Well, they're both bad names, but Grevious is such an obvious fucking designator name. It's akin to General Badperson. Skywalker is much better.

      OC the only good star wars with Episode V. And not cuz of the story, but because of the excellent directing. The scripts have always sucked balls (tho I loved the movies as a kid)

      --
      Photos.
    32. Re:General Grievous? by mmkkbb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a robot MONKEY? george has been watching too much powerpuff girls...

      --
      -mkb
    33. Re:General Grievous? by Jakhel · · Score: 1

      Why would a proctologist be on /.?

    34. Re:General Grievous? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      But who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    35. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ, you're dumb.

    36. Re:General Grievous? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You mean from assembly. Unless the leg position in this picture was chosen to hide something ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    37. Re:General Grievous? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Or his nephew Colon Panic, sponsored in the 2004 Olympics by Taco Bell.

    38. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for starting the funniest thread I have read anywhere, ever.

      Good thing I had no drink at hand.

    39. Re:General Grievous? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So I'm guessing that you're one of those people that 25 years ago said, "Skywalker? How cheesy is that? Does he even think he's a native-American tribal hero?"

      *Sigh* I had this conversation once with somebody about Star Wars. I mentioned not liking Episode I and he immediately jumped on me with "Why? Because Han Solo and Princess Leia aren't in it?" He then proceeded to lecture me about how wrong I was etc. This guy was so defensive about Star Wars that he latched on to that old excuse. It really is hard for some people to get the idea that Episodes I and II were bad movies whether they're compared to the original trilogy or not.

      A lot of people get Star Wars, and they still don't like the new trilogy.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    40. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to imagine yourselves writing an opening crawler for episode III that couldn't be in some way criticised for any stupid elitist star wars zealot.

      Amen. Thank you.

    41. Re:General Grievous? by flumps · · Score: 1

      "Sir, we've run out of assholes!"

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    42. Re:General Grievous? by Malicious · · Score: 1

      What's the matter Col. Sanders? Chicken?

      --
      01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    43. Re:General Grievous? by GTRacer · · Score: 4, Informative
      Your retort is more insightful than you know...the Clone Wars shorts for Cartoon Network were directed by none other than PPG creator Genndy Tartakovski. Grievous is in it. He totally wails on some Jedi in a 3-on-1 battle. It's actually good stuff but I'm waiting to get the whole 20 5-minute episodes run together as one.

      GTRacer
      - Will be in a midnight line out of habit with tempered optimism in my heart...

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    44. Re:General Grievous? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      Isn't his son Corporal Punishment?

      Yes, and his brother is Private Parts. He has a sister as well, Major Payne.

    45. Re:General Grievous? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Why would a proctologist be on /.?"

      He's still mad that you bit his finger.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    46. Re:General Grievous? by suffe · · Score: 1

      How about General Emergency? Perhaps he can comment on this himself and answer all our questions.

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
    47. Re:General Grievous? by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      "My god, how fucking stupid can Lucas get?"

      Yeah, he should return to his dramatic heights of Jar Jar Binks, kung-fu muppet Yoda, and conniving asian-accented aliens.

      Or maybe he should just pay the ushers to movie goers accross the head with big fucking "OBVIOUS CULTURAL ALLUSION MALLETS" (think banhammer).

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    48. Re:General Grievous? by xfmr_expert · · Score: 1

      He's related to Major Asshole (Spaceballs..."I'm surrounded by assholes!") Ahh....good flick. They don't write em like they used to.

    49. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you see him, ask him if he knows General Failure who keeps reading my hard disk.

    50. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's so obvious a name, yet you can't even fucking spell the damn word. whatever, porkins.

    51. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiiight. Because only an rabid Star Wars nutjob would think that "General Grievous" is a stupid name.

      You, sir, are an idiot.

    52. Re:General Grievous? by Hits_B · · Score: 1

      Every time some little detail about Episode III is revealed, people is always looking for catastrophical flaws at first sight and flashbacking to episode I.

      Exactly...what's next? Judging the credits at the end of the movie? Oh yeah and one more thing......IT'S A MOVIE FOR GOD'S SAKE

    53. Re:General Grievous? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Funny
      I assume you meant "kernel," but no: my intent was to provide the homophone "colonel" since it is a military rank and the accepted pronunciations of the two words are pretty much identical.

      Thank you, Captain Obvious!

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    54. Re:General Grievous? by Glsai · · Score: 1

      Well because he's not really a droid. He's more of a cyborg I guess. And not knowing any spoilers I'd be willing to bet he's a fallen Jedi or maybe even Darth Sidious' mentor who was crippled a la vader and brought back with cybernetics to still fight.

    55. Re:General Grievous? by TylerTheGreat · · Score: 1

      His uncle is General Specific?

    56. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Captain Obvious was the guy who said "Shouldn't that be Kernal Panic?"

    57. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "how fucking stupid can Lucas get?"

      It's best not to ask that question. He just might provide an answer.

    58. Re:General Grievous? by wuukiee · · Score: 1

      No... no.... they done FAR worse already in Episode II.

    59. Re:General Grievous? by CoreWalker · · Score: 3, Funny

      We have Darth Tyrenus, Darth Sidious, Darth Maul, General Grievous... what's next, Darth Meanie? Darth Badguy?
      I'm still convinced that Count Dooku is named as such just because it was as close to 'Count Poopie' that Lucas could get without being TOO obvious.

    60. Re:General Grievous? by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      A lot of people get Star Wars, and they still don't like the new trilogy.

      What's there to 'get' about Star Wars? I mean, I liked these movies but they weren't exactly deep and intriguing.

    61. Re:General Grievous? by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Wow, another movie, another villain. Notice how the first Star Wars movies actually had a consistent cast? Yes, Moff Tarkin buys the farm in the first movie, but the rest of the baddies are in it from the start - Vader, Palpatine, and Jabba.

      Meanwhile, Palpatine swaps out a new flunky we've never heard of before each movie who is the villain for the flick.

      As stupid as his name was (and as confusing as his role was), I was hoping Dooku would return as the villain in Ep3, just to avoid the "look, here's a new baddie! Buy his action figure" effect Lucas seems to adore.

    62. Re:General Grievous? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "What's there to 'get' about Star Wars?"

      Well, if you're confusing SkyWalker with the name of a Native America, you probably don't get Star Wars.

      Didn't think I'd have to explain that part of my post.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    63. Re:General Grievous? by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      All I'm tryin' to find out is what's the guy's name on first base.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    64. Re:General Grievous? by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 1

      FYI, Dooko is japanese for poison.

      --

    65. Re:General Grievous? by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      What's more, if you're going to have three seperate villans, the sensible order to have them in is the robot first, then the sinister count who is behind the robot, and then finally an actual honest-to-goodness Dark Lord of the Sith, leaving a vacancy for Annie when the heros finally beat him.

      Having a padawan take out a Dark Lord at the beginning doesn't really build the Sith up that much.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    66. Re:General Grievous? by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      Christopher Lee returns as Dooku/Tyranus in this movie as well.

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    67. Re:General Grievous? by madprogrammer · · Score: 1

      Funny - I reacted the same way... but when Neal Stephenson called his main character Hiro Protaganist, I thought it was great.

      Btw... Does anyone else hear the name "Count Dooku" and think "Care Bears"?

    68. Re:General Grievous? by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Flaws? In the first movie? Inconceivable!

      Unless you count the Stormtrooper walking into the door, I guess...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    69. Re:General Grievous? by pezpunk · · Score: 1

      "you're kidding, that guy on the news is a robot monkey?"

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    70. Re:General Grievous? by christober72304 · · Score: 1

      I know he sounds wierd, but if you have seen the last of the 20 cartoon episodes aired on Cartoon Network, he is pretty cool and kicks some serious butt. :D

    71. Re:General Grievous? by Hynee · · Score: 1

      My god, how fucking stupid can Lucas get?

      Oh come on, the whole film is dominated by characters with dumb names. Luke Skywalker? He's a pilot. Darth Vader? Death/Dearth Invader.

      That's one of the things I noticed as a kid, the names were descriptions. Yoda's just a play on Yoga, because he's supposed to be spiritual, etc etc.

      --
      Damn, I already moderated this topic. Now I'll have to log in with my sock puppet to comment.
    72. Re:General Grievous? by dosius · · Score: 1

      "doku" ~.^

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    73. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to go out on a limb, and guess that the two Jedi in question are Obi-Wan and Skywalker. Am I right? Do I get a prize?! Oh, poo.

    74. Re:General Grievous? by renderhead · · Score: 1

      Choosing that name for a character was an error on Lucas's part. There's an adjective to describe just how bad an error it was, but I can't seem to remember what it is.

      --
      I wish that my inferiority complex were as good as yours.

      -RenderHead

    75. Re:General Grievous? by servognome · · Score: 1

      I mean what's going to come in the next movies, some pilot named Skywalker, a hottie named Oola, fat guy named Porkins, a race of Squids called Calamari, a musician named Droopy McCool, some three eyed guy named Ree-Yees.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    76. Re:General Grievous? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Count Duuku makes me think Count Duckula more than anything else...

    77. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shh, don't tell Lucas! He might make a prequel to "Howard the Duck". In this one Count Duckula and Howard battle each other while destroying major cities.

    78. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about General Failure?

    79. Re:General Grievous? by coopaq · · Score: 1
      "Why would a proctologist be on /.?"

      With all the goatse posts it's no wonder.

    80. Re:General Grievous? by Dysan2k · · Score: 1

      Who's on first.

      --
      -What have you contributed lately?
    81. Re:General Grievous? by Hyecee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you might be focusing on the wrong continuing cast. It's not necessarily the villains who are or should be continuous.

      All six movies do have a continuous cast: Vader (Anakin), the Emperor, Yoda and Obi Wan. The rest of the characters are really just a supporting cast for the main character.

      And the main character isn't always who you'd think it is. All 6 movies are really a biography of Vader, just told from different and varying points of view. Quite interesting idea, actually.

    82. Re:General Grievous? by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      Darth Vader == Dark Father

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    83. Re:General Grievous? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Seriously guys, if you try hard enough, you can easily see flaws in almost everything, even in the old trilogy...

      Don't bury the movie till you see it


      So what you're saying is... It's a waste of effort to try hard to find flaws now, because they're going to be really obvious once we actually see it?

      Thanks, that's actually good advice. I'm sure there will be much worse crap to mock about Ep. III than just the name of the droid general (just like Count Dooku was by far not the stupidest thing in Ep. II).

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    84. Re:General Grievous? by syousef · · Score: 1

      You've hit the nail on the head. Lucas has a lot to live up to. Trouble is Eps I and II didn't do it, and Ep III isn't likely to. People want to see the new episodes living up to the originals and they just don't.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    85. Re:General Grievous? by syousef · · Score: 1

      Dark Helmet: I am your father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate.
      Lone Star: What does that make us?
      Dark Helmet: Absolutely nothing, which is what you are about to become.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    86. Re:General Grievous? by txmadman · · Score: 1

      Friend of Commander Data? Oh wait, wrong "Star" paradigm...

    87. Re:General Grievous? by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      And who's this General Failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    88. Re:General Grievous? by SEEDELS · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the formidable Major Poland!

    89. Re:General Grievous? by OleMoudi · · Score: 1

      No, I'm just saying people who concentrate only on flaws and raise their importance to the maximum level (even long before they actually see the movie), probably wont't be able to see any good income the movie could deliver to a less exigent audience.

      It's sort of "the trees do not let you see the forest" thing. The same thing happens when a JRR Tolkien fan talks about how bad the Jackson's movies are because they modified completely several parts of the books.

      --
      ---------
      Thinking never hurt anybody --MacGyver
    90. Re:General Grievous? by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      You forget, the movies also have threepio and artoo. Really, the original trilogy is told as much from their perspective as anyone else's. Its sad that Lucas lost that somewhat in the prequels, turning them into bizarre sideplots more than the audience's eyes.

    91. Re:General Grievous? by tooth · · Score: 1
      The initial instructions that Director George Lucas gave the Art Department were very open-ended

      It's interesting that Peter Jackson took the opposite approach with LotR, even down to slapping lumps of clay onto model of the Orc Captian(?) in RotK.

    92. Re:General Grievous? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      And I'm just saying that Ep. 1 and 2 were so replete with flaws that saying "Don't say the movie is crap already because 'General Grievous' might just be a lone example of suckage" is woefully naive. ;)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    93. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, and Commodore Amiga is close to the top of the chain of command.

    94. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't bury the movie till you see it

      C'mon, /. is a geek outlet. After a hard day of bitching about people at work, geeks need to come home and unwind by bitching about people outside of work.

    95. Re:General Grievous? by Cally · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks a bunch , smart-arse! I happened to be chewing a mouthful of peanuts when I read that. Now my monitor's gonna need a thorough cleaning tomorrow, after the hang-over wears off! (I didn't even need to hit the link.) Nurse! Nurse! ...

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    96. Re:General Grievous? by imperious_rex · · Score: 1

      He's the bastard child of Rear Admiral Brown!

    97. Re:General Grievous? by Begossi · · Score: 1

      You'll laugh, but in portughese, Count Dooku sounds like "Count Of Asshole".
      Believe it or not, they had to rename him to Count Dookan (in the subtitles) for the Brazillian audience.

      --
      Friend of the Wise, Brother of the Brave.
    98. Re:General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The initial instructions that Director George Lucas gave the Art Department were very open-ended: "a droid general"

      I guess that's why General George gets the big bucks. <sigh>

    99. Re:General Grievous? by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      Right, because that's so much more arch than, say, a villain named "Darth Vader" (dark-death-invader; "Vader" is also a form of "father"), a mercenary outsider named "Solo," or heroic pilots named "Skywalker"...

      There may well be all sorts of things wrong with Revenge of the Sith, but the name "General Grievous" hardly qualifies as one of them, I think; it really is pretty much in keeping with long-established Star Wars traditions.

    100. Re:General Grievous? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      General Grievous is the "ultimate" battle droid. The pic you posted was from the last episode of the Clone Wars cartoon on Cartoon network...just before Grievous wipes out Ki-a-Munid...jedi master.

      From Star Wars books you know Lord Vader keeps droid lighsaber fighers for "practice"...several models newer than Grievous. [see the opening of Shadows of the Empire...happens to be lucasfilm cannon:(] Also, from the news articles on SW the intent of Lord Vader is to one-up Grievous by being both robot and Jedi.

    101. Re:General Grievous? by zonker · · Score: 0

      a robot monkey? sorry, had to plug...

  8. General Grievous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My god, how fucking stupid can Lucas get?

  9. thanks... by phyruxus · · Score: 3, Funny

    but meesa wait for the broadcast.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    1. Re:thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>but meesa wait for the torrent

      Fixed your post for you :)

    2. Re:thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're assuming he wants to waste network bandwidth AND hard drive space on Episode III. Which is a hell of an assumption after those first two.

  10. Not again! by wjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why does it sound like the story line to Episode I? Seriously, Kidnapped (Captured) Political Figure, Jedi go save her. They dont need to use the story line from Episode 4 all 4 times.

    1. Re:Not again! by TheNextBigThing · · Score: 0

      GL is a big parrallel story fan. I've got a bad feeling about this.

      --
      Three men walk into a bar. They all got concussions.
    2. Re:Not again! by Metzli · · Score: 1

      Why not? People paid to see it three times, why would anyone expect them not to pay to see it four times?

      It's funny, everyone I knew went to see Episode I because it was Star Wars. Then, they went to see Episode II while saying, "There's no way it can be a lame as Episode I." Now, they're planning to see Episode III while saying, "The prequels _have_ to get better or at least show some tie-in with Episode IV."

      Personally, I'll go see it just to see how far Lucas will stretch this out just to make a buck. IMHO, he should've simply stopped with Jedi....

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    3. Re:Not again! by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Actually, I saw Episode I, found out it sucked badly, and avoided Episode II until I could be reassured that it wasn't as hideously bad. Of course, it seems it was even worse, so I will likely never see it, or Episode III. Or, probably, anything more by Lucas.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:Not again! by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

      That's a lot of kidnappings. This is starting to sound more like "Man on Fire". What next, Yoda sticking a thermal detonator up Gen. Grievous' exhaust port? "Last wish, hmm? More time I wish you had."

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    5. Re:Not again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are one of the few. I had seen I, I went to see II expecting it to be better. On a side note I thought II was far worse then I. I will go see III, but to stick it to lucas I will d/l it.

    6. Re:Not again! by emilymildew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not ties-in to EpIV that I'm looking for. Lucas already has too much *wink wink* about things. See also: "This is my girlfriend, Baru." "This is my robot, C3PO."

      He's breaking the things that he originally wrote to wink at the audience, and that's stupid.

      Dear George Lucas,

      learn subtlety.

      Love,
      emilymildew

    7. Re:Not again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, it is something equally lame that does in the general.

    8. Re:Not again! by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you not see the extended version of Episode I?

      At the end the Jedi defeats the evil koopa and then Padme comes out and she's all like,

      "Sorry, Jedi, but your Princess is in another castle."

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    9. Re:Not again! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      He's breaking the things that he originally wrote to wink at the audience, and that's stupid.

      I think George Lucas and Rick Berman meet secretly in dark places to scheme, laughing, drinking to "evil", wearing purple and green outfits.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    10. Re:Not again! by nganju · · Score: 2, Funny

      Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Foreshadowing

      Can't get enough foreshadowing? Feel cheated because there wasn't a scene in Attack of the Clones where someone says "You're a pretty good Moff, Tarkin, but you're not quite a grand Moff"? Well, you're going to be happy with Episode III, because our sources inform us that there's going to be plenty more of the awkward, forced foreshadowing that filled the first two prequels! Check out this preview:

      "Golly, no one will ever make the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs!"

      "If I ever have a son, I'd like him to have my lightsaber when he's old enough. But not to use against me!"

      "In local news, Mos Eisley has moved up to second-most wretched hive of scum and villany."

      "Okay, me and the rest of the Bothans will be back soon with the information! Don't worry, we won't die!"

      "Call me Ben. Obi-Wan is a name I hope not to hear again in a long time. A long time."

      "These new 'Scout Walkers' can handle anything you throw at them. Except wood of course."

      "Your voice is kind of whiny and reedy for a Sith Lord, Anakin. Can't you get a voice coach or something?"

      "Jedi Master Windu's bravery and wisdom will be remembered for, oh, 27 years, tops."

      "Aren't the Skywalker twins cute? And such sexual tension between them!"

      "Let's remove R2's jet rockets and put in some sort of teddy bear zapping device instead."

      "Well, that's it. There's no hope."

      --
      There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    11. Re:Not again! by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      LOL! That's friggin' hilarious... :)

    12. Re:Not again! by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      "Wow, no one would ever find a hidden jedi here on Dagobah. Especially if he were colored to match the surroundings and had a low, hunced profile."

      "Yeah, I wanted X-wings, but the TIEs were cheaper, and I'm sure a few maneuverability issues won't ever make a difference."

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
  11. Back to the Future by TFGeditor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it just me, or does the whole "back to the future" approach somehow degrade the Star Wars saga? The new stuff has nifty effects and all, but it just doesn't have the "feel" of the originals.

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    1. Re:Back to the Future by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is it just me, or does the whole "back to the future" approach somehow degrade the Star Wars saga?

      Agree. SW jumped the shark when Yoda said "tree you make like and get out of here!".

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Back to the Future by gotgenes · · Score: 1

      Shutup, butthead!

      --
      It's such a fine line between stupid and clever.
    3. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats becasue originals were not supposed to be classics. They were supposed to cheezy "cowboys in space" movies that far to many geeks have become obsessive over and have looked for deaper meaning in.

      Do you all look for some great social statement form the Indiania Jones trilogy or do you just accept that

      THEY ARE ONLY FUCKIGN MOVIES and enjoy the entertanment they offer.

    4. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it just me, or does the whole "back to the future" approach somehow degrade the Star Wars saga? The new stuff has nifty effects and all, but it just doesn't have the "feel" of the originals.

      I agree. The originals "feel" like shit. The new ones sound and look better with the updated effects. same shitty story, but hey, it's hollywood.

      well, I WAS way way too young when I watched the original star wars, so I am immune to nostalgia. I can't BEAR to watch the originals now, I tried, but failed.

      let's face it people, "Star Wars" was supposed to be a trash movie to collect a couple of bucks and try special effects tech. even the cast confirms that, if you pay attention to the interviews.

    5. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me feel like Riverdancing!

    6. Re:Back to the Future by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > THEY ARE ONLY FUCKIGN MOVIES and enjoy the
      > entertanment they offer.

      The problem is the entertainment value has dwindled. The original movie was pretty whiz-bang, and delightfully cheesy, though I cringe through quite a bit of it now.

      The Empire Strikes Back was where it hit its stride, and really left us SW freeks at the time hanging on for what Episode VI would be like.

      Episode VI bashed us over the head for f*cking ever with that awful Jabba's Palace sequence, though seeing Carrey Fisher in a skimpy outfit was something of a payoff. Unfortunately the movie just sort of collapsed. I believe David Brin wrote a really keen analysis of Episode VI, pointing out that whether Luke turned to the Dark Side or not was meaningless, as the shield generator was destroyed and the second Death Star (another f*cking Death Star???) was doomed anyways.

      Episode I managed to ruin the notion of the Force by trying to technobabble it. I mean, Darth Vader didn't need some midochlorian detector to tell the guy that blew up the first Death Star was strong with the Force, so why is it suddenly so necessary for the Jedis earlier on?

      Episode II didn't even make much sense. Dooku's role is just bizarre, and even the first time I saw it was scratching my head as to why he's revealing to Obiwan that there's a Sith Lord controlling much of the Senate, when he's in fact the bloody f*cking apprentice to said Sith Lord. Yoda's little tacked on explanation of sowing seeds of disharmony (or whatever the line was) was idiotic, and seemed just that, tacked on to try to explain this really screwy encounter between Dooku and Obiwan.

      In other words, the plotting of these movies is just plain bad. When your remove the special effects, only Episode V really stands up, and the others could have been written by a high school creative writing student.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Back to the Future by Reignking · · Score: 1

      I would give all my mod points to this post...I came way too close to bursting into tears at work...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    8. Re:Back to the Future by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Episode II didn't even make much sense. Dooku's role is just bizarre, and even the first time I saw it was scratching my head as to why he's revealing to Obiwan that there's a Sith Lord controlling much of the Senate, when he's in fact the bloody f*cking apprentice to said Sith Lord.

      The villain explaining the entire evil plot to a captured hero is a movie cliche far older than even Star Wars itself.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    9. Re:Back to the Future by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      > The villain explaining the entire evil plot to a
      > captured hero is a movie cliche far older than
      > even Star Wars itself.

      Except that that cliche has the evil guy rubbing his hands together going "Since you're all going to die anyways, I might as well tell you that I've stolen the Shroud of Turin and will use it to roll cigarettes. Bwahahahahahaha!"

      This flunks out because the evil guy is acting like he's not the evil guy, but still giving away the evil plan. The cliche has evil guys always being proud. This one has at least one of the evil guys being mentally retarded, and if Palpatine told him to do this, then by extension, Palpatine is certifiably idiotic as well.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:Back to the Future by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd have to agree.

      After reading the scroller, I thought, "Gee, this scroller doesn't have half the epic prose that the other 2 from the 2nd trilogy have, let alone the original trilogy." I hope you know what I mean.

      Even this fan film has a better, more "epic" feel to the scroller, IMO.

      Not only that, but unlike the other 5 movies, there's no real distinction as to which side is "good" and which side is "bad". It's even more chaotic than ESB in that respect - much more so. It seems to me that, while the Jedi and Sith are seemingly on respective sides, both sides are portrayed as "evil" to some degree: whoever becomes "Emperor" (Palpatine? Palpatine's clone? Is Palpatine the clone?) seems to be in control of Doku, Separatists are controlled by a Sith, and Empire = Republic. Even the scroller says so much, with comments such as "Evil is everywhere."

      I'll likely see it on opening night myself, simply because I want to find out about the whole Emporer/Palpatine/Clone? confusion and how the various Sith power structures and betrayals play out. That's what's interesting about EpIII, not "Anie is Vader". That's been clear since Ep1 and ESB/RotJ.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    11. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ man, you missed the whole point of my post. Who give a fuck about the plot details. Did you like the movie, obviously no. That is fine but all teh constant yelling about hwo it sucks, WTF is up with that? It is just a movie. There a lots of them I do liek and lots I don't. Only difference is I don't start a fucking war evertime a se(pre)quel isn't as good as the original.

    12. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dooku was being evil and clever, as he was messing with Jedi's mind. He knew they would never accept his words at face value, so he told them the truth just give them something to over-analyze.

    13. Re:Back to the Future by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      > Dooku was being evil and clever, as he was messing
      > with Jedi's mind. He knew they would never accept
      > his words at face value, so he told them the truth
      > just give them something to over-analyze.

      Well maybe that sort of explanation suits you, but to me it sounds like they needed some sort of confrontation between Dooku and Obiwan just to justify Dooku's existence in the script.

      Lucas and his writers have a very hard time properly plotting out a story. Lucas is, I'll admit, a pretty good idea man, but it's when somebody else of talent comes along and thinks the story through that it works. That's why Episode V is the best. Leigh Brackett was a great storyteller, and she was able to take the underlying ideas and make a really good story out of them.

      There's some real diamond in the rough material in Episodes I and II; clone armies, the structural problems of the Old Republic, the failing of the Jedi order both in powers and numbers, a Force-powerful dark lord instigating revolts and internal tensions to seize power.

      These are ideas with a lot of potential, but Lucas never seems very sure of what kind of story he's trying to tell. Is a political thriller? Is it a war story?

      For all their flowers, episodes IV, V and VI were reasonably straightforward. The first one was a space cowboy film. The second one had a tight story line, the best acting we were going to see out of Fisher and Hamill, and some genuine nailbiting sequences in the last half (I always thought the Hoth sequence dragged on, though).

      Episodes I and II suffer from the same problem of bad plotting that Episode VI did. The stories just aren't well thought out, which I think is exactly why I don't like the Dooku-Obiwan encounter. It just doesn't seem to fit, and the post hoc claim by Yoda that Dooku was just trying to confuse everyone seems horribly tacked on. They wanted to make Dooku a big character, and the only way they seemed to be able to do it was with the capture of Obiwan.

      Of course, Episode III is going to suffer from the fact that we already know or guess much of the storyline;

      1. Anakin and Amadella have twins (strong in the Force they are)

      2. Dooku is eliminated or otherwise gotten out of the way (a smart writer would make him turn on Palpatine and reveal all to Yoda, but I'm sure Lucas will just kill him off after some long-winded saber fight)

      3. Annakin will be seduced to the Dark Side by Palpatine, Anakin and Obiwan will have a fight and Anakin will be horribly burned and mutilated and then saved by Palpatine (his journey to the Dark Side is now complete)

      4. Palpatine will reveal himself and use the Clone Warriors (aka Storm Troopers) to seize power, there'll be a big battle scene where the remnants of the Old Republic will be largely swept away,

      5. The twins will be hidden (although you think Vader might look up his step-brother's address sometime)

      6. Amadila will probably be killed and Obiwan will hang out in the desert

      Most of this has been obvious since we found out that Lucas was making Episodes I to III.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re:Back to the Future by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      2. Yoda kills Dooku on Dagobah. Dooku's death is indirectly referenced in ESB when Luke comments on how dark in the Force some area is. This "dark force" from Dooku's death is also what allows Yoda to hide out without being detected by Vader.

      4. Clone troopers and storm troopers are different people.

    15. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ on a Crutch, man, but the 'Original' Star Wars were never so retarded that the characters would have put ***JarJar*** in charge of ANYTHING, much less in a position to catalyse the ruin of the Republic. I mean really, would Han Solo have put up with that bullshit? No. Then again, he would have shot FIRST, too... ;)

  12. IS this spelled right? by SirChris · · Score: 0

    Episode III REVENGE OF THE SITH War! The Republic is crumbling under attacks by the ruthless Sith Lord, Count Dooku. There are heroes on both sides. Evil is everywhere. In a stunning move, the fiendish droid leader, General Grievous, has swept into the Republic capital and kidnapped Chancellor Palpatine, leader of the Galactic Senate. As the Separatist Droid Army attempts to flee the besieged capital with their valuable hostage, two Jedi Knights lead a desperate mission to rescue the captive Chancellor....

    1. Re:IS this spelled right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, when I first read your post I thought you'd said, Episode III REVENGE OF THE SHIT. Maybe that should have been Lucas' title for this movie after all.

  13. Revenge - Return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wants to bet that the real name will be the Return Of The Sith, just like Jedi wasn't a "Revenge" movie?

    1. Re:Revenge - Return by nightznoe · · Score: 1

      It was changed from return to revenge then back to retun again because as a Jedi, you're not suppose to take revenge. It's all about that holier than thou thing the Jedis are supposed to be...but there is no reason a bad guy can't exact revenge

    2. Re:Revenge - Return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know no one is going to read this but...

      It was changed from return to revenge then back to retun again because as a Jedi, you're not suppose to take revenge. It's all about that holier than thou thing the Jedis are supposed to be...but there is no reason a bad guy can't exact revenge

      I heard somewhere that this is the real story:

      Two movies were set to release at the same time, Star Wars: Revenge of the Jedi, and Star Trek: The Revenge of Khan. To eleviate the possible confusion and be fair, both had to change their names.

      Don't know where I heard it, but I believe it.

  14. Spoiler by TheNextBigThing · · Score: 5, Funny

    Annikin becomes Darth Vader!!

    --
    Three men walk into a bar. They all got concussions.
    1. Re:Spoiler by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thanks for ruining the movie. By the way: Rosebud was his sled.

    2. Re:Spoiler by larkost · · Score: 1

      I spent half of Episode randomly chuckling and pointing out to the person next to me that he (Annikin, at that point a little boy) is going to sleep with her (Amidala... an attractive young woman). I think that she got annoyed with me, but I thought it was really funny.

    3. Re:Spoiler by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      So I hear in the re-re-release of ESB (the one you can get "today on DVD") blows the whole wad by having the Emperor say something to Vader about the "son of Skywalker" waaaay before the scene where Luke falls off the whatever that thing was.

      Damn, Lucas. The telegraph has been obsolete for more than a century, yet it's still your favorite form of communication.

    4. Re:Spoiler by starrsoft · · Score: 1
      I did a double-take on this post:

      Annikin becomes Darth Vader!!
      --
      He's just making it up as he goes along!

      trying to figure out if that was all part of the message, or whether the part below the "--" was his sig. I hit reply and found that it was his sig. Congrats on a relevant sig!

      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
    5. Re:Spoiler by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      All you "know" at that point in the OT is that Vader was Obi-Wan's pupil who also murdered Daddy Skywalker. It isn't a direct spoiler if you haven't seen the rest of TESB or ROTJ.

      That's like saying the "he's our last hope, no there is another" scene in TESB is a dead giveaway to Leia being Luke's sister, it could have been Chewbacca that was the last hope for all we knew at the time.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    6. Re:Spoiler by RevMike · · Score: 1

      Bruce Willis is dead throughout the whole movie.

    7. Re:Spoiler by tenton · · Score: 1

      Darth Vader has a sled named Rosebud?

    8. Re:Spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inconceivable!

    9. Re:Spoiler by geeky+2 · · Score: 1

      No Duh Batman!

      --
      THINK man THINK
    10. Re:Spoiler by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      it could have been Chewbacca that was the last hope for all we knew at the time.

      Leia: I'd just as soon kiss a Wookiee!
      Han: I can arrange that. You could use a good kiss!
      Luke: Uh.... I already kissed him. I thought he might be my sister.

    11. Re:Spoiler by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      And there are no monsters around the village and it's really the 21st century, not the 19th.

      Oh, and Mace Windu caused the train crash in Philly.

  15. Capitalization by Mekabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

    Separatist Droid Army and not SEPARATIST DROID ARMY?

    1. Re:Capitalization by PepeGSay · · Score: 1

      I was wondering myself why there were no ALL caps items in this particular crawl. But it appears that episode one had no all caps items either.

    2. Re:Capitalization by doughmein_dot_net · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that the only capitalized terms in all 6 of the crawls (except for the titles) are these:

      II: ARMY OF THE REPUBLIC
      IV: DEATH STAR
      VI: GALACTIC EMPIRE

      Does anyone else see something here?

      --
      Super ninja monkeys will one day rule the world!
  16. Well... by gustgr · · Score: 1

    As expected, not very exciting IMHO...

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and yet you post about it...

  17. War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Chagatai · · Score: 5, Funny
    Absolutely nothing!

    Seriously, with the way the new crawl starts with the word "War!", Lucas just might have replaced it with "Ass!" or something else asinine.

    --
    --Chag
  18. NOOOO!!!!!!! by paranode · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's not true, that's IMPOSSIBLE!!!!

    1. Re:NOOOO!!!!!!! by mog · · Score: 1

      don't you mean unpossible?

    2. Re:NOOOO!!!!!!! by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 1

      Unconceivable.

    3. Re:NOOOO!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    4. Re:NOOOO!!!!!!! by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      It's perfectly cromulent idea...

    5. Re:NOOOO!!!!!!! by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      Informative modding is pure gold.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    6. Re:NOOOO!!!!!!! by Stavr0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Search your feelings... you know it to be true...

    7. Re:NOOOO!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your lack of faith disturbs me.

  19. Crawler Text in case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Episode III
    REVENGE OF THE SITH

    War! The Republic is crumbling under attacks by
    the ruthless Sith Lord, Count Dooku. There are
    heroes on both sides. Evil is everywhere.

    In a stunning move, the fiendish droid leader,
    General Grievous, has swept into the Republic
    capital and kidnapped Chancellor Palpatine,
    leader of the Galactic Senate.

    As the Separatist Droid Army attempts to flee
    the besieged capital with their turgid hostage,
    two Jedi Knights and a brave but clumsy Gungan
    warrior lead a desperate mission to rescue the
    captive Chancellor....

    1. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by rsteele19 · · Score: 1

      If you can read this,
      you don't need glasses.

      --

      This sig is umop apisdn.

    2. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by cplusplus · · Score: 1

      "...and a brave but clumsy Gungan warrior lead a desperate mission..."
      Are my hopes and dreams coming true? Is this the part where Jar-Jar finally dies?

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    3. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by Bonker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Episode VI
      THE RETURN OF THE HYPE
      Money! Lucas' Fanbase is crumbling under
      the onslaught of bad film after bad film.
      Theree are people camping out for Episode
      III, but everyone thinks they are just
      kinda sad.

      In a predictable move, Lucas Arts has
      announced dozens of new action figures
      and marketing tie-ins. Ronald McDonald has
      been Kidnapped and is being replaced by
      Yoda, C-3P0, and Chewbacca.

      As the general geek community attempts
      to brace for another soul-crushing
      dissapointment, Jar Jar Binks threatens
      to taint yet another gasping breath of
      a dying franchise...

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    4. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by EggMan2000 · · Score: 1
      That sounds like a B movie plot line. I think Penny Arcade Had it right.

      Anyway, I'll watch it on video.

      --
      what? what I thought we were in the trust tree in the nest, were we not?
    5. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by buraianto · · Score: 1

      You know, I felt the same about Captian Kirk in Generations. Everyone clapped. But you know, the movie still would have been better without him.

    6. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by Xoro · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is a time of uncertainty. the
      empire's ambiguous tariff statutes
      mandate close reexamination of
      galactic export quotas. Interim
      Princess Agoomba has co-chaired
      a subcommittee to draft amendments
      to existing trade policies.

      Meanwhile, regulatory agencies
      are being heavily lobbied by a
      consortium of mercantile interest
      groups and their suppliers to
      streamline loading restrictions for
      class C cargo vessels. The shipping...

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
    7. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

      Where's a mod point when I need one?

      --
      Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
    8. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been done. And better than this.

      Nice try, asshole.

    9. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by rollerbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      Episode III
      REVENGE OF THE SITH

      War! - huh - yeah-
      What is it good for?
      Absolutely nothing
      Say it again y'all

      Ohhh... War! I despise
      Because it means destruction'
      Of innocent lives

      War means tears
      to thousands of mothers eyes
      When their sons go to fight
      and lose their lives

      I said - War! Huh - Good God y'all
      What is it good for?
      Absolutely nothing
      Say it again

    10. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by ClownsScareMe · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points my friend, they'd be yours...

      --
      I read Slashdot for the articles
    11. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are heroes on both sides. Evil is everywhere.

      It's nice to see that the eloquent writing we've come to expect from George Lucas will be present in this film.

      ruthless Sith Lord... stunning move... fiendish droid... besieged capital... turgid hostage... brave but clumsy Gungan... desperate mission... captive Chancellor....

      Truly nothing spices up prose like using adjectives to modify every noun. You can never have too many adjectives. I hope Peter Roget gets a writing credit for this film, as his work was no doubt consulted for this passage.

      turgid hostage

      While "turgid" can certainly mean bombastic or ostentatious, it can also mean bloated or distended. Maybe Grievous will swing by a drugstore before leaving Coruscant and pick up some Gas-X for Palpatine. I don't know that the first definition really applies either- one of the few highlights of the first two films, IMO, is the performance of Ian McDiarmid as Palpatine, which portrays him as an oily politician making secret power plays rather than as a lectern-pounding demagogue.

      swept into the Republic capital and kidnapped Chancellor Palpatine... besieged capital....

      Now, I take it by "Republic capital," they mean Coruscant, right? I didn't get a chance to see all of the cartoon "Clone Wars," so maybe someone will correct me, but is it even conceivable that the Separatists could penetrate deep into the Republic and lay siege to the Republic capital, which happens to occupy an entire planet? I mean, of the "Clone Wars" shorts I did see (mostly from early in the run, I admit), the battles were pretty even affairs, with maybe even a slight edge to the Republic forces. And of course, the battle at the end of II was a convincing victory for Republic forces that destroyed countless droids and threw the Separatists into a panicked retreat. So now they've turned the tables and have the Galactic Republic on the ropes?

      I won't mind this point at all, though, if it means the opening shot of III is a gigantic space battle in orbit around Coruscant. And I mean gigantic, large enough to be convincing that an entire planet-covering city is under siege. However, judging from recent evidence provided by Lucas, the opening shot is more likely to be Anakin telling Padme that her love is more like ice than like lava or some crap like that.

    12. Re:Crawler Text in case of /.ing by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      That's added text. I rewrote it from the gift in a Notepad instance. The most stable program Microsoft has ever made, I think. Anyway here it is.

      War! The Republic is crumbling under attacks by the ruthless Sith Lord, Count Dooku. There are heroes on both sides. Evil is everywhere.

      In a stunning move, the fiendish droid leader, General Grievous, has swept into the Republic capital and kidnapped Chancellor Palpatine, leader of the Galactic Senate.

      As the Separatist Droid Army attempts to flee the besieged capital with teir valuable hostage, two Jedi Knights lead a desperate mission to rescue the captive Chancellor....

      --
      For context, click Parent.
  20. "There are heroes on both sides" by manifoldronin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess that leaves the door open for whatever the upcoming Lucas Arts games.

    --
    Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    1. Re:"There are heroes on both sides" by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I guess that leaves the door open for whatever the upcoming Lucas Arts games.

      Sure, but the question on everyone's mind is, will Lucas Arts Games acquire exclusive rights to Premiership Soccer or NHL Hockey before returning to writing games about jedis, droids and lightsabre duels.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:"There are heroes on both sides" by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      System Error:
      Can't obtain exclusive rights. That method is only possible where games_publisher='EA'.

  21. And with that... by JasonUCF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And with that, the final raping of your childhood memories of Star Wars is now nearly at hand. Grab your wallet, grab your glasses, and grab your ankles.. May is coming sooner than you think!

    1. Re:And with that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May is coming sooner than you think!

      You mean before April?

    2. Re:And with that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lord, I hate the Star Wars prequels as much as anybody, but could we please stop modding this bottom-shelf flamebait crap "Insightful"? I know we despise Lucas here at Slashdot, but that doesn't mean that "George Lucas is poopy!" deserves +5.

    3. Re:And with that... by grunherz · · Score: 1

      ... the final raping of your childhood memories of Star Wars ... I've held my tongue (keyboard) for almost six years of Star Wars Slashdot posts talking about George Lucas "raping of your childhood memories" with the new trilogy and I just have one thing to say:

      ENOUGH ALREADY - Christ they were just friggin' movies for crying out loud!!!

      If I had mod-points you'd receive my first ever -1 (Redundant) because that's just what it is ... fscking redundant.

      OK we get it; George Lucas has ruined your childhood memories.

      Established.

      Sucks to be you that you identify your developing years by how you reacted to three movies.

      But to each their own.

      Thank you.

      Back to your regularly scheduled griping and complaining.

      --
      Four weeks, Twenty papers, that's two dollars ... plus tip.
    4. Re:And with that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come here, come on, come now.. it's going to be okay. Have a cookie. Somebody wants a hug? Is somebody a snoogie woogie bear? WHO'S MY SNOOGIE WOOGIE BEAR? HUG

    5. Re:And with that... by grunherz · · Score: 1

      I don't accept hugs from AC's. Nice try though.

      --
      Four weeks, Twenty papers, that's two dollars ... plus tip.
    6. Re:And with that... by Holdstrong · · Score: 1

      Eveybody has key childhood moments and memories. Why is it so shocking or offense to you that for a lot of people, those memories and moments happen to be tied to the original Star Wars?

      It is not just about those 3 movies. It has to do with the totality of the memories from a childhood spent playing with action figures, acting out scenes with friends, pretending to be Han, pretending your dog was Chewy, dreaming about Princess Leia (wait did I just say that?)....

      Along with family, friends, little league, and a host of other fond and great memories.... Star Wars was and is a part of a lot of childhoods. So yeah, people are gonna react and be pissed off when it is tarnished or ruined in some way. I think this is perfectly natural. It is as natural as being upset about having any other fond and important childhood moment or memory ruined.

    7. Re:And with that... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      You want an icecream? You wanna pee in mother maggie's shoes?

  22. Can someone explain something(s)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Dooku good or evil? Which is the Empire and which is the Rebellion? Is Dooku on either one of those?

    Which side (Palpatine vs .Dooku) is the one that gets Darth Vader and the Storm Troopers?

    Since Palpatine is the Emperor, how can he be on both sides?

    I've seen Episode II a bunch of times, but frankly, I can't figure it all out. This isn't a troll, I'm curious. (Posted anon. out of attempt to maintain some geek cred.)

    1. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by slungsolow · · Score: 1

      Dooku is evil, and he is more than likely the current apprentice to sidious. Anakin takes his place after Dooku is disposed of.

    2. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Is Dooku good or evil?

      Evil. It's the laughing at wholesale destruction and killing the Jedi that gives it away...

      Which is the Empire and which is the Rebellion? Is Dooku on either one of those?

      The (Old) Republic becomes The Empire. The Rebellion hasn't started (because it has nothing, yet, to rebel against). Dooku is on the side that will become The Empire.

      Which side (Palpatine vs .Dooku) is the one that gets Darth Vader and the Storm Troopers?

      Palpatine and Dooku are on the same side. They are both Sith (i.e. evil).

      Since Palpatine is the Emperor, how can he be on both sides?

      Palpatine is creating a war situation to allow him to seize tighter control and disband the senate. This is a fairly unoriginal trick amongst politicians (see Margret Thatcher in the UK and George W. Bush in the US for real life examples - although they were both a bit less blatant about it). Palpatine's minions are running the separatist movement, under his orders.

      I've seen Episode II a bunch of times, but frankly, I can't figure it all out.

      It's not exactly complicated...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm chief, our Senate's doing just fine over here.

      Thanks you Stalinist fag.

    4. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by RobinH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since Palpatine is the Emperor, how can he be on both sides?

      He's a politician, right? It doesn't matter which side of the aisle he sits on, he's evil through and through.

      Seriously, episodes 4, 5, and 6 were about the rebels (clearly good guys fighting for their freedom) overcoming the "evil empire". It was clear where the good/bad distinction was. In episodes 1, 2, and 3, it's the story about how they got to that point. There were no clear sides, just decay throughout the entire old republic. Some people were good and some people were bad, but the good guys weren't organized to see what was going on.

      To me, this is all very much related to how we all perceive world events. In the late 70's, early 80's, there was a clear good and bad side to the world (from our perspective in the west). The soviets were the "evil empire", and we were all the good guys fighting for freedom. In this day and age, the lines have blurred. Nobody's sure who's on "our" side, and we're all afraid about terrorists infiltrating our own neighourhoods. We still want to live by the old ideals of freedom, but we are also aware that there are people in power who might not have the noblest intentions. It's hard to paint Iraq or Iran as truly "evil" because we shy away from stereotypes now. The governments can't unite us against any enemy that we can't all agree is evil.

      When I was growing up 20 years ago, the U.S. was the ultimate "good guy" nation. Now, none of us (outside the U.S.) know who the good guys really are anymore. Many of us expect the U.S. to turn on the rest of us merely out of its own self interest, even if it's against its own self-proclaimed principles to do so. Within the U.S., it seems like many people also worry about whether their own government will turn on them some day.

      Movies tend to mirror the ideas and fears of the time when they are made. These movies are no exception.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    5. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2
      I've seen Episode II a bunch of times, but frankly, I can't figure it all out.
      It's not exactly complicated...

      Actually, I agree with the GP. I have followed all of the movies and Ep II is way too complicated (not to mention boring). I had to watch it three times in order to understand ANY of the politics (on HBO -- I wasn't about to pay to see the movies in the theater again).

      I consider Ep II to suffer from a similar problem to Godfather III. Each movie is way too complex (the Senatorial politics of Ep II/the Vatican politics of G-III)). And, each movie has one horrendous acting performance (Hayden Christiansen/Sophia Coppolla).

    6. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think someone "score 1: flamebait"'d the wrong post there...

    7. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Alci12 · · Score: 1

      Britain has a senate? Dam, I knew I should have listened more at school.

    8. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Movies tend to mirror the ideas and fears of the time when they are made. These movies are no exception.

      You're giving Lucas a LOT of credit.

    9. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      " Now, none of us (outside the U.S.) know who the good guys really are anymore."

      Speak for yourself I live in Canada. Good guys = Us, Sweden, Switzerland, China, Russia, etc.

    10. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Funny
      Movies tend to mirror the ideas and fears of the time when they are made. These movies are no exception
      So George W. Bush is just making it up as he goes along, too?

      (I keed, I keed)

    11. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Apparently not, since Margaret Thatcher disbanded it.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    12. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by chowbok · · Score: 1

      No, because Thatcher disbanded it! Can't you read?

    13. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by madmaxmedia · · Score: 1
      It's not complicated, but as another poster pointed out it's not shown very well either. We get this text in the beginning about who's who, and this takes the place of having to show any context of what is happening.

      Like how does a major Jedi like Dooku end up turning to the dark side? Why doesn't anyone see this coming? Why can't anyone feel a "disturbance" in the Force (in general, the Jedi seem to have all the psychic ability of Madame Cleo. When something bad happens they just furrow their brow and sit there.) Why do we really care?

      I guess my main problem is that none of it seems really plausible in any way. Lucas can do good guy/bad guy fine- Darth Vader wears BLACK and breathes OMINOUSLY and STRANGLES his underlings without hesitation, thus he is EVIL and must be stopped. Luke is INNOCENT and GOOD, and Leah is PURE and GOOD too (they both wear WHITE), let's hope they WIN!

      But Lucas is lost with anything that requires subtlety and a deft touch. I could list some examples but they're pretty much self-evident in the prequel movies. It's a shame, because I think the underlying story actually has (had) potential.

    14. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Dooku is evil, and he is more than likely the current apprentice to sidious. Anakin takes his place after Dooku is disposed of.

      Which, I expect, will occur in the very first act of the movie. Part of the problem of Ep I and II (and from the look of "General Grievous" Ep III as well) has been Lucas' "rent a villain" approach - we get the villain of the week for each new episode, and that means much less time actually constructing credible villains. Honestly, compare the screen time either villain has gone in either of the current episodes to the screen time Vader gets in any of IV, V or VI. Poorly developed completely disposable villains don't tend to make for very interesting stories, especially when new evil villains crop up out of nowhere all the time (they just get mentioned in the scroller at the beginning as the new villain - no other explanation required).

      Yes, yes, Darth Sidious is consistent through all 3, but he hardly has any screen time, and isn't exactly a menacing villain that our heroes must battle with, given that none of them have even seen him yet.

      Jedidiah.

    15. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me, this is all very much related to how we all perceive world events. In the late 70's, early 80's, there was a clear good and bad side to the world (from our perspective in the west). The soviets were the "evil empire", and we were all the good guys fighting for freedom. In this day and age, the lines have blurred
      Georgie isn't refering to the present- this is a prequel. Georgie went the other way- Palp's evil empire rises from the confusion surrounding the resolution of the clone wars. Just like Stalin's evil empire rising from the ideological confusion (USA allied with USSR) and resolution of WW2.

    16. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Dooku is evil, and he is more than likely the current apprentice to sidious

      In Episode 2, Dooku was called "Lord Trannus" by Sidious, and fired lightning at Yoda.

      Have you seen it?

    17. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa... while I'll agree Canada is as close to a "good guy" as you're going to get, the others don't stack up quite as well. Hell, Switzerland still won't give back the money from their Holocaust bank accounts to the Jewish descendents of the people it was stolen from in the first place. Don't even get me started on China and Russia. Yeesh

    18. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by slungsolow · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have seen it. The only reason I said that he is more than likely the current apprentice has to do with him not being called the apprentice in ep II.

    19. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tyrannus. (Latin for "tyrant", from Greek "tyrannos," "unconstitutional ruler.")

    20. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I have followed all of the movies and Ep II is way too complicated (not to mention boring). I had to watch it three times in order to understand ANY of the politics (on HBO -- I wasn't about to pay to see the movies in the theater again).

      I consider Ep II to suffer from a similar problem to Godfather III. Each movie is way too complex (the Senatorial politics of Ep II/the Vatican politics of G-III)). And, each movie has one horrendous acting performance (Hayden Christiansen/Sophia Coppolla).


      The Imax version of EpII was quite good.
      For technical reasons they had to cut over 20 minuttes from the film for it to fit on an Imax reel, so it's the same movie, but with 20 minutes less of Anakin whining.
      Much better movie, I think I'm even gonna wait for the Imax of epIII, spare me the useless bits.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    21. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      In Episode I & II, Darth Sidious gets plenty of extra screen time- if you haven't figured it out Palpatine IS Darth Sidious.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    22. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Umm chief, our Senate's doing just fine over here.

      As long as you do the Chancilor/President/Emperor's bidding, your Senate usually does just fine.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    23. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Well duh. But that is hardly time developing a better villain, and actually Palpatine doesn't get that much either. That's a pretty sorry excuse as far as the lack of credible interesting villains goes. You may as well say "But Darth Vader (as Annakin) gets lots and lots of screen time!" Yes, he does, but it hardly makes up for the lack of a villain of any note.

      Jedidiah.

    24. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

      A very subtle set of films, actually.

      Did you catch the cloud or water imagery in the second film. What about the use of colours to casually foreshadow Anakin's maternal attachment ("blue for the boy, red for his mother"). Or the use of masks, duplicates, moon imagery???

      There is tons of stuff there that most people don't bother to look for because they don't like the film or think reading anything into it is a waste of time. But that doesn't mean it isn't there. Case in point, consider the thematic split between ego and id on Naboo. Hardly accidental that Jar Jar (the id) is the one who proposes the droid army. Anger triumphs reason.

      And if Lucas uses conventional imagery, it isn't as stiltedly as you suggest. Consider cloud city. A perfectly "white" (heavenly) city which turns into a blood-red hell sequence as sunset falls suggests the capacity for evil which lies within the individuals of that film as well. Or look at the final transformation of C3PO at the end of Attack of the Clones. His physical transformation into a battledroid is nothing more than a symbolic manifestation of the changes all of the other "good" characters undergo (abandoning pacifism for violence).

      No wonder they all lose.

    25. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It's called the "House of Lords" and is roughly analogous to our Senate. Just as the "House of Commons" is roughly analogous to our "House of Represenatives".

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    26. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      I can understand your confusion, but I don't think it's the complexity of the plot itself in Episode II that is the problem; it's the sheer incompetancy with which it was executed.

    27. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      There is tons of stuff there that most people don't bother to look for because they don't like the film or think reading anything into it is a waste of time.

      Nor does it make it a good film. Clumsiness is still clumsiness, even if it's subtle. Colors? That's his idea of subtle nuances? That's something a 6 year old does in drawings. Try a Kurosawa film sometime (Ran, for example), or even something as mainstream as The Ice Storm for true use of subtlety. Those examples you listed are so hackneyed and cliched that it's painful.

    28. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Metapsyborg · · Score: 1
      Seriously, episodes 4, 5, and 6 were about the rebels (clearly good guys fighting for their freedom) overcoming the "evil empire". It was clear where the good/bad distinction was. In episodes 1, 2, and 3, it's the story about how they got to that point. There were no clear sides, just decay throughout the entire old republic. Some people were good and some people were bad, but the good guys weren't organized to see what was going on....

      A good interpretation, and seemingly valid. One thing I would like to point out, however: you're saying that Lucas draws a parallel between the "good" forces and the US, the "bad" forces and whatever our current enemy is. In the cold war era, the US was the blatant good side, whereas the USSR was the "obvious" evil empire. You then go on to say that in the new movies Lucas is portraying the shades of grey in current conflicts. Possible.

      You left one part out though, ignoring it. You said that the Old Empire (the US, ie the good) is rife with decay/decadence: "There were no clear sides, just decay throughout the entire old republic." There is a clear side; whatever side is opposite the Emporor/Palpatine is good. Do you really think that Lucas is criticizing the US (Old Empire...) as suffering decay and decadence? While I believe this (that the US is going the way of Rome), I'm not so sure about Lucas. If Lucas doesn't believe this/desire to portray it, then I think that your earlier readings of epI-III are slightly...generous to Lucas.

      On another topic: episodes I through III all suck/will suck; they are crippled by immature writing, excessive and careless use of CG, bad acting, unrealistic interactions/connections, and they completely miss the point of the original 3 star wars. Also, I believe that the three "prequels" are Georgie's mid-life crisis; he's desperatly attempting to prove that he can still make good movies, but all he manages to do is make his audience question whether he ever had that ability and wasn't just lucky.

      --
      (\(\
      (^.^) INFECTED
      (")")
    29. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by li99sh79 · · Score: 1
      Do you really think that Lucas is criticizing the US (Old Empire...) as suffering decay and decadence? While I believe this (that the US is going the way of Rome), I'm not so sure about Lucas. If Lucas doesn't believe this/desire to portray it, then I think that your earlier readings of epI-III are slightly...generous to Lucas.

      Back during the run-up to Episode I or II there was an interview with Lucas in Time where he said just about exactly that. He's fascinated by the Fall of Rome and how seemingly invicible civilizations go splat.

      -sam

      --
      I was just here, where did I go?
    30. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not exactly complicated...

      On the recommendation of others, I've only watched the prequel episodes while completely drunk. They seem to be fairly enjoyable, though they didn't make a lot of sense -- I think. I don't actually remember anything that happened in any of them, but I'm told I had fun doing it.

    31. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Evil. It's the laughing at wholesale destruction and killing the Jedi that gives it away...

      You're just falling for propaganda from the entrenched power elites. Anyone with eyes can see that the Jedi are the evil ones. Come on, they sent two men to mediate a trade-dispute, but in ten years they did nothing to end slavery on Tatooine -- they couldn't even be bothered to free Shmi Skywalker, the mother of one of their most promising students. Clearly the Jedi are just lackeys of the corporations, bent on maintaining the status quo with no thought to the proletariat.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    32. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Wicked187 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the Communist rhetoric that the Soviets wanted to impress apon America via Hollywood.

      --
      Politics, Life, and More on my Aspiring for the Future
    33. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by jafac · · Score: 1

      NOt just politicians.

      I've worked under many a manager, who've through apparent incompetence, engineered a wholly unrealistic schedule, then, when the team inevitably falls behind, a crisis is thus manufactured, justifying 100-hour work-weeks, and other draconian measures.

      If, by some miracle, the project succeeds, the manager is promoted (Cheney/Cold War), and the unneeded engineers (Peace Divident) laid off.

      If the project fails, the manager (Powell/Iraq, Ashcroft/Domestic WOT) is moved to another project, and one of the engineers is promoted to take over (Rice, Gonzalez), to take the fall for the failure of the project.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    34. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

      I get the feeling that if Lucas actually DID refilm Ran frame-for-frame his criticism would consist of nothing but attacks on how boring the damn thing was, especially the early scenes which were (really) far too political. No-one needs that many shots of people moping around in the grass nor do they really want to see minutes of old men creeping out of burning fortresses when a couple of action shots would have done just as well.

      You get the film you get, and this one is a serial space adventure. Live with the conventions of the genre or don't go. And you can call the criticism hackneyed and cliched, but that doesn't even approach a sophmoric level of film analysis.

      >> Lucas can do good guy/bad guy fine- Darth Vader wears BLACK and breathes OMINOUSLY and STRANGLES his underlings without hesitation, thus he is EVIL and must be stopped. Luke is INNOCENT and GOOD, and Leah is PURE and GOOD too (they both wear WHITE), let's hope they WIN!

      If you understood the parent post, I think you'd understand why this is a misinterpretation of the film.

    35. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by imputor · · Score: 1
      And, each movie has one horrendous acting performance (Hayden Christiansen/Sophia Coppolla).

      Yeah, and Mark Hamil's performance was just STELLAR.

    36. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by RobinH · · Score: 1

      You left one part out though, ignoring it. You said that the Old Empire (the US, ie the good) is rife with decay/decadence: "There were no clear sides, just decay throughout the entire old republic." There is a clear side; whatever side is opposite the Emporor/Palpatine is good. Do you really think that Lucas is criticizing the US (Old Empire...) as suffering decay and decadence? While I believe this (that the US is going the way of Rome), I'm not so sure about Lucas. If Lucas doesn't believe this/desire to portray it, then I think that your earlier readings of epI-III are slightly...generous to Lucas.

      I'm not saying that movies parallel current events, but rather that they mirror our current popular ideas and fears. There's a difference. Star Trek tended to do the same thing, and actually came close to paralleling events (with the climax in movie number 6). I'm talking more about the "mood". 80's movies were more good vs. evil, man vs. man. Today's movies are more about man vs. himself. There's a lot more anxiety. There's more distrust of authority now than there ever was when I was growing up. Ideas like that cause revolutions.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    37. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Live with the conventions of the genre or don't go.

      How sad for you that you think just because a film is in a certain genre does it have to be constrained to simple metaphors.

  23. Re:spoiler- by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, I am your father.

  24. Must RESIST ... must resist .. whimper by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Look. Look.
    See. See.
    Look. Look. Look.
    See. See. See.
    See Anakin. See Anakin turn. Turn Anakin turn.
    See Jedis. See Jedis die. Die Jedis die.
    See Palpatine. See Palpatine rule. Rule Palpatine rule.
    Look. See Darth Vader. See Amidala. See Amidala give birth and hide children. Hide them Amidala.
    See Amidala die. Die Amidala die.

    There's so much to see.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Must RESIST ... must resist .. whimper by Croaker · · Score: 1

      See JarJar.
      See JarJar not die.
      DIE JARJAR! DIE! PLEASE!!!!

    2. Re:Must RESIST ... must resist .. whimper by eitherbunny · · Score: 1

      What?

      Is there to be no "See Anakin Jump. Jump Anakin, Jump?"

      No "See Anakin run. Run Anakin run." in this soon to be released prequel either?

      Without the traditional scenes of running and jumping, what prey tell shall warrant the overwhelming theatrical score of shrill flute notes in rapid succession...
      Simply walking around will fail to bring the scenes the energy that we have become accustomed to with the running and jumping from the previous productions.
      I fear the plot simply won't develop properly without someone running and jumping...

      What about tradition...? =P

  25. No, but... by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny

    It did say "This isn't the story you're looking for" at which point I had an uncontrollable urge to say "Move along, move along". That was weird.

    1. Re:No, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A long time agao...
      War was beginning.

      Captain: What happen ?
      Mechanic: Somebody set up us the bomb.
      Operator: We get signal.
      Captain: What !
      Operator: Main screen turn on.
      Captain: It's you !!
      Cats: How are you gentlemen !!
      Cats: All your base are belong to us.
      Cats: You are on the way to destruction.
      Captain: What you say !!
      Cats: You have no chance to survive make your time.
      Cats: Ha Ha Ha Ha ....
      Operator: Captain !!*
      Captain: Take off every 'Zig'!!
      Captain: You know what you doing.
      Captain: Move 'Zig'.
      Captain: For great justice.

    2. Re:No, but... by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 2, Funny

      I felt a great disturbance in the force, as if millions of souls were suddenly disappointed...

    3. Re:No, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so it worked for you?

  26. Count Dooku? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    ugh, no wonder he is evil, what a terrible name "Hello Dooki...i mean dooku"

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  27. Twist by TheNextBigThing · · Score: 0

    I just want to know what the twist is. Will GL make everything the way we expect like Annakin allies with Sith, becomes vader, get in a fight...etc. Gotta be something more. I hope.

    --
    Three men walk into a bar. They all got concussions.
  28. Revised Crawl by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Funny
    REVENGE OF THE LUCAS
    Cash! The production house is crumbling
    under attacks by the ruthless
    Sith Lord, and Slashdot fanboys.
    There are whiners on both sides.
    Ennui is everywhere.

    In a stunning move, the
    fiendish droid leader, General
    Lucas, has swept into the
    Hollywood capital and kidnapped
    famous movie critics, and leaders of
    the big studios.

    As the exhasperated Slashdot army
    attempts to flee the onslaught
    of PR pushed by bought-for flaks
    two Jedi Knights lead a
    desperate mission to rescue the
    captive franchise...

    1. Re:Revised Crawl by ufpdom · · Score: 1

      .... Those two jedi knights are CmdrTaco and CowboyNeal

      --
      There's no Freedom like UFP-dom
    2. Re:Revised Crawl by MrBallistic · · Score: 1

      if only there were a gnaa reference in there, all would be well with the force.

  29. Just when you thought it was safe . . . by Captoo · · Score: 1

    Don't let the MPAA find out that you viewed the crawler text on-line. They'd freak!!!

  30. asking for your opinions by greechneb · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So for someone who hasn't seen all of the Star Wars series:

    Should I wait until this comes out, and then see the 6 in their intended order?

    Or should I forget all the prequels, and just watch the original three?

    Or watch the original three, then the prequels?

    I'm curious what the general concensus is. I've just never watched them, except for the original star wars once. (Now that I've shocked everyone, what's your opinion?)

    1. Re:asking for your opinions by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I would suggest that you don't watch ANY of them. Honestly, they just aren't worth it. And, this is coming from someone that went to the theater multiple times when Star Wars first came out.

    2. Re:asking for your opinions by SpartacusJones · · Score: 1

      I'm kinda jealous of you- I think it would be interesting to be able to watch them all for the first time in order (number wise, not production-wise).

    3. Re:asking for your opinions by hencethus · · Score: 1

      Watch the original trilogy (the original versions if you can find them on VHS or something), then only watch the prequels after you've tried really hard to resist.

    4. Re:asking for your opinions by grub · · Score: 1


      Should I wait until this comes out, and then see the 6 in their intended order?

      My thinking, and I'm no Star Wars fanboy, is that you should watch Ep IV, V & VI then I, II & III as stand alone trilogies. Trying to make sense of what Lucas has done makes a mockery of IV-VI.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:asking for your opinions by Metzli · · Score: 2, Funny

      Watch IV, then V, then VI. Unless you're _really_ bored and/or inebriated, skip I and II. We'll see about III, but I'm not holding my breath....

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    6. Re:asking for your opinions by Fr05t · · Score: 1

      Holy crap greechneb where the hell have you been!? In my oppinion if you haven't seen any of the movies I'd wait until 3 has come out then watch them all start to finish. The ep 1-3 will suck more and more, then 4-6 will seem that much better. It would be like eating your own crap for a month then sitting you down in front of the finest steak and potatoes the world has ever seen!

    7. Re:asking for your opinions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch the orignals, and that's it. All the "new" ones suck big ass. Really, they really are much worse than episodes 4-5-6. I expect the coming ep3 will be no surprise.

    8. Re:asking for your opinions by zergl · · Score: 1

      Go for the old ones first.
      Watch them. Then watch them again. Repeat as often as you want.

      And then skip the new ones. They Suck[tm]. I watched Episode 2 for a few minutes by accident (popped in while my brother was watching it with a friend on DVD) and I was really shocked. And besides the story being so shallow that not even a newborn could drowon in it you should at least think that they'd get proper SFX, but the creatures in that arena battle were like shouting "LOOK! I'M CGI AND LOOK WORSE THAN JURASSIC PARK!". So, IMHO, forget about the new ones, except you are really strong enough in the Force to endure it.

    9. Re:asking for your opinions by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be really inebriated to make I/II something you can stand to watch at all...

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    10. Re:asking for your opinions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People that have never seen the original SW trilogy make be feel old... saw it in the movies on first release...

    11. Re:asking for your opinions by grungebox · · Score: 1

      I'm making my girlfriend do that, see them all in numerical order. I'm pushing for a one night Star Wars-a-thon, but I think we'll have to settle on a movie-a-night deal and spread it out over a week. It's been three years of waiting (I decided to do this right before seeing Attack of the Clones myself, since I just found out then she'd never seen a single Star Wars). Unfortunately, she knows Vader is Luke's dad (stupid pop culture references), so that part kind of loses its punch. We'll see how this goes in late May.

    12. Re:asking for your opinions by lxs · · Score: 1

      Wait until 7, 8 and 9 come out and watch them all in order. Then ask the nurse to wheel you back to your room and call your grandchildren to tell them about it.

      Is Lucas still planning to do the sequels? And if so, will it take another 20 years to start filming? Does anybody know? Does anybody care?

  31. The original by numbski · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Long ago, in a galaxy far, far away, the Old Republic was
    crumbling away, rotting from the corruption and treachery
    within. Power-hungry technocrats and wealthy bureaucrats
    maneuvered and bribed their way into office, while one am-
    bitious senator plotted to destroy the Jedi and rule the
    galaxy.

    Hoping to restore virtue and the remembered glory of the
    Republic, the High Council of Senators dispatched the Jedi
    Knights - protectorate of justice in the galaxy - on a
    quest to retrieve the lost Kaiburr Crystal. They believed
    that the small diamond-like object (which intensified the
    power of the Force) would unite the disaffected among the
    people and would destroy the corruption around them.

    However, within their Council, the evil Senator Palpatine
    had other traitorous designs. Foreseeing that the Crystal
    would secure his position as Emperor, Palpatine deceived one
    of the Jedi Knights and sent him to acquire the Crystal.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:The original by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      So I take it that the Jedi want to find some magic crystal that will bring galactic peace and happiness. This plot sounds more like it originated in some New Age hippy commune out in the desert in New Mexico.

      "Yeah man, let's use the power of the crystals and we'll live in peace and harmony with our galactic brothers! Let's celebrate with some weed!"

      It's no wonder the Jedi were exterminated if they had digressed to the point of finding magical crystals to solve their problems.

    2. Re:The original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you mean original crawl, you are mistaken. The original crawl has never been changed. That was, I'm guessing, taken from a novel called "Splinter of the Mind's Eye".

      If, by original, you mean original synopsis "legend,", this is it:

      PROLOGUE

      Another galaxy, another time.

      The Old Republic was the Republic of legend, greater than distance or time. No need to note where it was or whence it came, only to know that ... it was the Republic.

      Once, under the wise rule of the Senate and the protection of the Jedi Knights, the Republic throve and grew. But as often happens, when wealth and power pass beyond the admirable and attain the awesome, then appear those evil ones who have greed to match.

      So it was with the Republic at its height. Like the greatest of trees, able to withstand any external attack, the Republic rotted from within though the danger was not visible from the outside.

      Aided and abetted by restless, power-hungry individuals within the government, and the massive organs of commerce, the ambitious Senator Palpatine caused himself to be elected President of the Republic. He promised to reunite the disaffected among the people and to restore the remembered glory of the Republic.

      Once secure in office he declared himself Emperor, shutting himself away from the populace. Soon he was controlled by the very assistants and boot-lickers he had appointed to high office, and the cries of the people for justice did not reach his ears.

      Having exterminated through treachery and deception the Jedi Knights, guardians of justice in the galaxy, the Imperial governors and bureaucrats prepared to institute a reign of terror among the disheartened worlds of the galaxy. Many used the imperial forces and the name of the increasingly isolated Emperor to further their own personal ambitions.

      But a small number of systems rebelled at these new outrages. Declaring themselves opposed to the New Order they began the great battle to restore the Old Republic.

      From the beginning they were vastly outnumbered by the systems held in thrall by the Emperor. In those first dark days it seemed certain the bright flame of resistance would be extinguished before it could cast the light of new truth across a galaxy of oppressed and beaten peoples ...

      They were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Naturally, they became heroes.

      --Princess Leia Organa
      From the First Saga
      Jornal of the Whills

      This was the text at the start of the original Star Wars novel published in 1977. It was removed from later printings, although I've seen it crop back up once or twice in a special trilogy publication that had all three original movie novels in one book.

    3. Re:The original by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Cool - I haven't read that in a long time, although I have that little gold book around here somewhere. :-) Thanks for the post!

      The original crawl did change once, when "Episode IV - A New Hope" was added at the beginning around the time that "Empire" was released.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  32. good grief by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

    General Grievous is described on the star wars site basically as a cyborg, not a droid.

    Or do they mean he's the general of a droid army?

    These people need good writers, that's for sure.

    1. Re:good grief by biryokumaru · · Score: 1
      and what about his name? "grievous" is as bad as "sleazebaggio"!!!

      and dooku has been used before, i think... so his name might not be new (im no expert on star wars here), but dooku is a pretty lame name as well. like "evil mr dookie head! rawr!"

      i guess the poor material on the writing side stems from the fact that lucas hasnt seen any of the other kurosawa films yet =p

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  33. Some real news about Revenge of the Sith by mustangdavis · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Anakin gets even with Count Dooku - and cuts off BOTH of his hands - before cutting his head off

    Obi-Won Kenobi kills the Jedi hunter, General Grievous - who can use three or more light sabers at one time, with the General's own blasters. The General's light sabers are trophies from Jedi he has slain in the past.

    Anakin turns on Mace Windu when Mace goes to face Palpatine/The Emperor. Mace dies by falling out of a window after the Emperor fries him with lightning.

    Yoda gets pwned by the Emperor

    Qui-Gon Jin comes back as a ghost and explains the true nature of the force to Yoda after he loses his fight with the Emperor.

    Anakin and Obi-Won fight each other with blue light sabers.

    Obi-won chops off Anakin's other real hand and both of his legs.



    Now there is some news about RotS!


    1. Re:Some real news about Revenge of the Sith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now there is some news about RotS!

      To hell with all that, What about Natalie Portman!

    2. Re:Some real news about Revenge of the Sith by Frobisher · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obi-won chops off Anakin's other real hand and both of his legs.

      Obi-won: What are you going to do, bleed on me?
      Anakin: I'm invincible!
      Obi-won: You're a loony.
      Anakin: The Black Knight always triumphs! Have at you! Come on then.
      [...]
      Anakin: All right; we'll call it a draw... Oh, oh, I see, running away then. You yellow bastard! Come back here and take what's coming to you. I'll bite your legs off!

  34. Create your own in Blender by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    It's not too hard to make your own SW crawl in blender, just make some 3D text with a stary background and run a camera pointed at an angle down it, render. S'fun.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Create your own in Blender by macklin01 · · Score: 1

      Or just map the image to a rectangle and move it past the camera...

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
  35. Well I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if one of us forks over ten bucks to see the end of RoTK +1 glowing sword, -1 ring of power and two gay dudes intead of hobbits I bet we can find out.

  36. Hope It's not Another Kid's Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I hope that the new Star Wars movie actually appeals to adults. If it is just another shoot-em-up robo movie, then I would be seriously disappointed. Such a movie would be no different from Voyager or Enterprise. They suck and are sucking.

    ... support human rights in Tibet

    1. Re:Hope It's not Another Kid's Movie by PriceIke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      May I suggest Battlestar Galactica as an alternative. Sci-fi for grownups.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    2. Re:Hope It's not Another Kid's Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I think BG has introduced a whole new genre - Sci-fi porn!

    3. Re:Hope It's not Another Kid's Movie by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Introduced? Didn't you ever see Barbarella?!?!?!?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:Hope It's not Another Kid's Movie by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Sci-fi for grownups.

      I had almost given up on Science Fiction. Lets face it, many of the standards are, well, juvinile. Battlestar Galactica isn't perfect, but I was very pleased to finally see something with more grown up aspirations and it gets a big thank you for helping to bring me back into the fold.

      TW

  37. Converts to gull blown screener by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It may only be a crawler when you first look, but I've just ordered this wonderful image enhancer sticker from an online store - the sticker's only about 1.5" by 2" and according to the spec it's manufactured from "advanced, outsized nanoparticles fused with filings from real phase inverted plasma conduits", and when you stick it on the side of your monitor you can see a full length screener of the film.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:Converts to gull blown screener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guaranteed to increase the image quality after only 10-12 viewings!

  38. Here's a spoiler for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will die alone!

    1. Re:Here's a spoiler for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's "Donnie Darko"!

  39. Typos above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Misspelled as "sith". Please correct ASAP.

    1. Re:Typos above by Lovesquid · · Score: 0

      Episode III
      REVENGE OF THE SHIT

      War! The Republic is crumbling under attacks by the ruthless Shit Lord, Count Dooku. There are heroes on both sides. Evil is everywhere.

      ...

  40. At this point? by Farrside · · Score: 1

    Watch all three Matrices in order... you'll get better value.

    1. Re:At this point? by greechneb · · Score: 1

      I already did that, and I should have stuck with just the first one.

    2. Re:At this point? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      What, Matrix Hermitian, Matrix Jacobian, and Matrix Determinant?

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    3. Re:At this point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The matrix determinant isn't a matrix -- it's just a scalar.

      The Wronksian is a perfectly good matrix and useful.

    4. Re:At this point? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Wronskian.

      I could have used the Matrix Adjugate, too, but I like the determinant.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  41. I like to think I'm not the only one.. by Tepshen · · Score: 1

    ... That is actually going to ignore this movie. I refuse to give lucas and other assorted madmen one more dollar for the previlage of being dissapointed. Any weakness will be shored up by howard the duck rentals.

  42. In case Slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Episode III
    REVENGE OF GEORGE LUCAS

    Profit! Skywalker Ranch is crumbling under attacks by the ruthless Rust Lord. There are dorks on both sides. Money is everywhere.

    In an all-but-stunning move, the fiendish droid director, George Lucas, has swept into the Movie realm and kidnapped anything vaguely interesting in the plot.

    As the idiotic producers attempt to get away from the box office with their shameful plot, two Midiclorian Wh0res and an unfunny Gungan warrior lead a desperate mission to rescue the Star Wars series....

  43. obligatory simpsons reference by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would be remiss in my duties if I did not bring up the Cosmic Wars crawler text.

    The Gathering Shadow

    It is a time of uncertainty. The
    empire's ambiguous tariff statutes
    mandate close reexamination of
    galactic import quotas. Interim
    Princess Agoomba has co-chaired
    a subcommittee to draft amendments
    to existing trade policies

    Meanwhile, regulatory agencies
    are being heavily lobbied by a
    consortium of mercantile interest
    groups and their suppliers to
    streamline loading restrictions for
    class C cargo vessels. The shipping...

    --
    My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
  44. Parody by boschmorden · · Score: 1

    In long, long time ago, galaxy far, far away. War was beginning. Obi-Wan: What happen ? Anakin: Somebody set up us the bomb. Yoda: We get signal. Obi-Wan: What ! Mace: Main screen turn on. Obi-Wan: It's You !! Palpatine: How are you gentlemen !! Palpatine: All your base are belong to us. Palpatine: You are on the way to destruction. Yoda: What say you !! Palpatine: You have no chance to survive make your time. Palpatine: HA HA HA HA .... Yoda: Take off zig every !! Yoda: You know you doing what . Yoda: Move 'zig'. Yoda: For just great.

    1. Re:parody by edson+at+lies.cl · · Score: 0

      AWESOME parody
      must see even to non-fans

      --
      i have found, you can find,happiness in slavery!
    2. Re:parody by eqkivaro · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO. Thanks. You made my day.

      -chris
    3. Re:parody by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 1

      Excellent *pushes fingers together in a steeple*

    4. Re:parody by Maul · · Score: 1

      An instant classic. I think that was even better than Troops...

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    5. Re:parody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A definite recommend - and it will be better than the movie

    6. Re:parody by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Uh, let's not get over-excited. It wasn't bad, but I don't think it will mean much to non-fans.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    7. Re:parody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something tells me that watching the the actual movie won't stand up to the experience of viewing that short clip. Excellent work, I say. Just that first glimpse of Obi Wan's flask, and subsequent wtf moment, was priceless.

    8. Re:parody by antdude · · Score: 1

      Good parody! It made me laugh hard. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:parody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Deathsticle" was classic

    10. Re:parody by raam · · Score: 1



      DEATHTICLE!!! :D

      I know what I'll be screaming out in embarassing glee as the movie starts!

    11. Re:parody by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Heh, normally you'd have to pay to see that EPT1138 scene :)

  45. STAR WAR!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it goes something like this...

    Episode III
    REVENGE OF THE SITH

    Bore! ...

    blah blah

    Just crap...

  46. Worst Star Wars ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm pissing my pants with anticipation.... ... this just MAY be the worst Star Wars ever.

    1. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention episodes 1 through 2

    2. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously.

      Why do we ever bother caring anymore? We all know that Lucas is just going to fuck this one up too. Will we have more jar-jar? Yup. Will we have more wooden acting? Yup. Will we have another wonderfully dark, brooding piece of science-fiction/fantasy like "The Empire Strikes Back"? Errr, no.

      Will we simply have to see it? Yeah, most of us. But I think I might wait until it comes out on video...

    3. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do we ever bother caring anymore?

      Because it is Star Wars ?

      Will we have more jar-jar? Yup.

      No. We had less Jar-Jar in Ep2 than in Ep1, so logically there's even less in Ep3. Besides, if you think about it, Jar-Jar was actually a neccessary character for the plot - to get the Republic army established.

      Yup. Will we have another wonderfully dark, brooding piece of science-fiction/fantasy like "The Empire Strikes Back"? Errr, no.

      Possibly. I don't really see how Ep3, with the birth of Vader and fall of the Republic (and death of nearly all jedis), could possibly be anything but dark.

      But, on more general note, was I the only one who actually liked Ep1 and Ep2 ? People seem to dislike them because they don't have the same feel as the Ep4-6, but of course they can't have the same feel - the original SW trilogy described a war, but the war only started at the end of Ep2.

      Just forget midiclorians (as Lucas apparently did in Ep2 - never, ever try to explain mystery) and the ludicrous episode of kid Anakin accidentally blowing up the droid battleship, and they are actually pretty good movies.

      I, for one, am very interested in seeing this one - now that the plot is moving full speed, with a desperate war being fought in the background, and Vader appearing to the scene, there is every reason to believe this could be the ESB of the new SW movies.

      It better be - because if they mess up my favourite childhood villain...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by dcarey · · Score: 2

      I, for one, am very interested in seeing this one - now that the plot is moving full speed, with a desperate war being fought in the background, and Vader appearing to the scene, there is every reason to believe this could be the ESB of the new SW movies.

      Roger that.

      Aside from the fact that many of us geeks grow up to become nilhilists, critics, and sardonic viewers of movie sequels such that nothing will please us (probably becuase we've learn that's somehow cool to poo-poo everything), I think on the average this film will rock. And if it does in the way you and I both think that it will, the naysayers will look pretty bad.

      Go ahead, naysayers -- pooh-pooh this film before it begins! I dare you!

      The sad truth is that because of nostalgia and the link between ESB and childhood, Ep3 could be the best, darkest piece of tragedy of all 6 and some in the geek crowd will still dismiss it.

      Then again, I liked Matrix Reloaded. Sue me.

      --

      -- (Score:i , Imaginary)

    5. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I liked them to.... (man, I should get an account, this is my 15th ano.... )

      Most people don't realise two critical aspects:

      Episode 1 was no where as good as the originals: true... but then, when was the last time you read a GOOD (not just any old one will do, it has to be one you thought was well thought out and well written) Novel where the first chapter was better that the one with the climax... (please no inuendo jokes)

      The 'Romantic' dialog in Episode 2 was supposed to be crap... what is anikin it that one late teens, early twenties at best... and in terms of emotional maturity we was at best 14. Have you ever listened to any one that age 'try' to be romantic in conversation, or better yet, remember when you yourself were that age and were trying to woo the women. Trust me, they are/you were that bad... no matter what you would like to believe.

      Anikin walks into Padmes appartment, seeing here for first time in 10 years: "And you've grown to, more beutiful I mean, for a senitor"

      Me in audiance: "That is the worst line I have ever heard!... wait a minute, it sounds familiar... holly shit, I used that one on *name removed to protect the innocent*, no wonder she ran screeming in fear!"

      so in conclution I have commpletly forgotten what it was I was going to say so:

      slashdot:"Character limit exceded..."
      me: bloody hell!

    6. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      We all know that Lucas is just going to fuck this one up too. Will we have more jar-jar? Yup.

      So, I'm not a terribly big Star Wars fan, but I recently watched Return of the Jedi for the first time in a while and it made me wonder: Do all of these people who hate Jar-Jar really have no problem with the ewoks? Jar-Jar is certainly annoying, but were the ewoks that much better? (It also made me wonder: The location of the thing that generates the shield was really given to Han Solo et al. by the empire as a trap to lure them there where there would be storm troopers to capture them. But why would the empire be so stupid as to give them the real location of the shield generator? Why not give them some bogus location and have the stormtroopers waiting there? This plan was just asking for trouble).
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    7. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The only problem with Ep1 and Ep2 was that George Lucas directed it. Let's face it, the guy cares more about action figures than acting.

      If George directs Ep3, it is sure to be another stink bomb.

      The thing is, I and many of my generation have been looking forward and dreaming about the Clone Wars since it was first mentioned in Ep4. George has to know the bar is set pretty high for this part of the story. In theory, it should be as good as or better than Empire, but I have a this sinking suspicion....

    8. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why ewoks are better than Jar-Jar.
      a) no pathetic slapstick. Jar-jar can't walk into a room without doing something stupid.
      b) no stupid speech. Ewoks make cute little noises, but don't actually sound like a Jamaican Elmer Fudd with down-syndrome.
      c) Ewoks who fought the storm troopers actually had casualties, like in a real battle. Gungans were mysteriously immortal in their fight against the battledroids.

      Ewoks were obviously, pointlessly cute, and the battle was a little silly with the stone-age ewoks taking out imperial AT-ST's, but they weren't as massively annoying as Jar-Jar.

    9. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Episode V, in my mind, still stands out as the best Star Wars installment. Probably it's because Leigh Brackett wrote the story, and she was one of the finest SF writers I've encountered (her Mars stories are heads and shoulders above Burroughs').

      To be honest, I loved Star Wars right up into my late 20s, but I have a hard time watching anything but Episode V any more. I popped in Episode II a couple of weekends ago and thought "I paid to see this in a theater?" What a pity that such vast resources were wasted on such a cruddy, ill-thought out story line.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by EvilAlien · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, Jar Jar was necessary for the plot... the problem is that the plot could have been developed without characters that sucked. The role of naive bit player being manipulated into catalyzing a critical shift in politics could have been filled with something that wasn't a moronic cartoon character designed so that kids had something to laugh at.

      Lucas has proven that he shouldn't be allowed to make movies without someone to remind him when has slipped into "talentless hack" mode. The problem isn't the nature story that needed to be told in Ep1-2, the problem is the way in which Lucas told the story. It is entirely possible to do non-war Sci-Fi competantly with engaging characters, good dialog, and great acting. That is not what we got out of Ep1-2... there were some shocking examples of pathetic acting (examples: Amidala falling out of the airborn troop transport, gets up a moment later without bothering to act the role of someone who would have been severely winded at best; Mannequin Skywalker... 'nuff said).

      IMO, Lucas' strengths are in the big picture, the overall story arc, but when he is left to do dialog and little important details, his movies turn into big action figure commercials (moreso than ROTJ). Visually, very impressive, but lacking substance. Don't get me wrong... he's a better screenwriter and director than Uwe Boll...

      That being said, I have high hopes for this movie. It had better not suck, because I'm sick and tired of people with way more money than talent being able to churn out crap while real artists have to bow and scrape to the studios so that half their vision can end up on the cutting room floor.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    11. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.5?

    12. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The 'Romantic' dialog in Episode 2 was supposed to be crap..."

      I was kind of hoping (and still am, really) that we'll discover that Anakin was really using mind tricks on her to convince her that she was in love with him. It's a far reaching and thinly strung hope without a prayer of coming to fruition, but wouldn't it make all those scenes better?

      it would for me.

    13. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by Baikala · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Do you know that "ano" in spanish means "anus"?

      --
      16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    14. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Do all of these people who hate Jar-Jar really have no problem with the ewoks?

      Oh, that's not the case at all. Personally, I think Jedi would have been tied with Empire if they had just replaced all ewok scenes with a black screen that said "Leia and Han fight to disable the shield generator (with the help of some damn muppets)".

      There is definitely a difference in order of magnitude between them and Jar Jar, though. The ewoks were too cute and kinda annoying, Jar Jar is just damn annoying. It's as if Lucas said "Why didn't people like the Ewoks? Hmm... I've got it! They weren't obnoxious enough!"

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    15. Re:Worst Star Wars ever? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1
      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  47. You have no valid option by texasfight · · Score: 1

    The only proper way to experience Star Wars was to watch the original, unbastardized Trilogy in a movie theatre. Unless you can find someone that has squirreled away a properly maintained print, this will never be possible again.

    Your next best option is to find someone with the original 3 movies on laserdisc.

    Stay away from the remakes and the new movies like you would avoid a bus-load of MPAA attornies infected with the plague.

    1. Re:You have no valid option by grub · · Score: 3, Informative


      Your next best option is to find someone with the original 3 movies on laserdisc.

      There are very good quality DVD-R ISOs of the original 3 ripped from laserdisc floating around the net. Nice to see Han shooting first.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:You have no valid option by texasfight · · Score: 1

      Great suggestion grub

      If I had mod points I would give them to you.

      Gotta go...must..get..to..google...

    3. Re:You have no valid option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try BitTorrent :) There are dozens of active seeds.

    4. Re:You have no valid option by m50d · · Score: 1

      Connect the laserdisc player to the digital projector in a japanese cinema, no?

      --
      I am trolling
    5. Re:You have no valid option by Cowclops · · Score: 1

      lol, those DVD-R ISOs of the Definitive Collection made from LD? I made that. Good to see people enjoying them.

    6. Re:You have no valid option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe :) I've seen a few different ones floating about. These are DVD-R with full menus, etc. If those are yours, bravo! They're excellent!

    7. Re:You have no valid option by Cowclops · · Score: 1

      Nah, somebody else took the video from the set I made and added their own menus. If it was called the "TR-47 set" (Long story about that one, its a guy I know and he didn't try to take credit for it but he was the main distributor) then its got the video I made. If it wasn't called that, the other way to check is that there is about 5 seconds of black in the middle of Empire Strikes Back, when they're on the asteroid trying to fix the Millenium Falcon. It is just after Han says they need to fix the negative reverse power coupling and before the infamous Leia welding scene (which is cut off in some pressings and not in others).

    8. Re:You have no valid option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dang! Now I'm going to have to check for that 5 seconds of black. I don't remember it.

    9. Re:You have no valid option by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Ironically, having watched the scene in frame advance on the laserdisc rips, I am forced to conclude that the movie is UNCLEAR on who shoots first. There is a flash of light, and Greedo slumps over. There is no visible proof in the original version that they did not both shoot.

      However, the fact that everyone ASSUMED that only Han shot simply underscores the idiocy of the change for the special edition. Everyone assumed that only Han shot because it would have been absurd for Greedo to have missed from that range.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    10. Re:You have no valid option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the original (NOT Special Edition, whatever) Greedo never gets a shot off.

    11. Re:You have no valid option by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      I'm telling you, the frame in which the shot actually takes place is all white. The laser bolt (or bolts) is never shown onscreen. There's no proof in the original that they didn't both shoot at the same time.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  48. The transition to anime.... by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

    Each premise becomes more and more wacko.

    Each character becomes more two dimensional.

    Seriously, I'm expecting nothing but dramatically colored animation with lots of shocked expressions.

    If the writing is like anime (not good anime, mind you), the sets are completely animated, the acting is like anime....

    To quote somebody from the upcoming movie (you know somebody's going to say it):
    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

    1. Re:The transition to anime.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe he should just hire the writers from Dragonball Z!

      And "General Grievious" sounds like a streetfighter name.

    2. Re:The transition to anime.... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If the writing is like anime (not good anime, mind you), the sets are completely animated, the acting is like anime....

      To quote somebody from the upcoming movie (you know somebody's going to say it):
      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

      Hey - that's Pedro from Excel Saga ! Maybe the Episode III is really named The Shadow From ACROSS!

      Ill Palazzo vs. Palpatine !
      Excel vs. Darth Vader !
      That Man vs. Count Dooku !
      Hyat vs. Jar Jar Binks !
      Pedro vs. Darth Maul !
      Nabeshin vs. Yoda !
      Ultra-cute alien conquerors vs. Obi-Wan Kenobi !
      And the Great Will of the Macrocosm vs. the Death Star and the Imperial Fleet !

      Now that I would pay to see !

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  49. Wrong Tack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have it all wrong -- while the first two movies were pretty good, Lucas' stories and new characters are just getting progressively dumber.

    Darth Sidious? General Grievous? What's next, Senator Poopyhead?

    1. Re:Wrong Tack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darth Vader? Han Solo? Luke "SkyWalker?" PORKINS, FFS!!!

    2. Re:Wrong Tack by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Considering he didn't start using teddy bears as characters until the third film, you may have a point. But then I'm wondering why a shriveled old Kermit-the-Frog as Zen master was such a great device in Empire. And then, have you actually seen the first film? There's a giant monkey in it, stereotype played to the fullest no less (why couldn't Chewbacca have been the smart guy, alpha male and Han Solo the bumbling sidekick?).

      Personally I found AotC very watchable and am looking forward to this next one. I expect a huge war and a lot of very serious drama (both in terms of Anakain succumbing to the Dark Side and the whole Amidala giving birth to Luke and Leia thing).

      At least Lucas managed to keep Star Wars not only viable, but enjoyable for decades. Not like the Matrix where they went from classic to crapola in one sequel and a handful of years.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  50. Duh! by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    Re:General Grievous?
    *sigh*

    Why 'General Grievous?'? Because General Electric was already taken!

    rimshot

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Duh! by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Why 'General Grievous?'? Because General Electric was already taken!

      It's actually because it's as much as he deserved. He isn't that dangerous, so they can't call him "General Deadly" or something. They call him "General Grievous" because he just kind of makes you...sad.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  51. Not palpable? by texasfight · · Score: 1

    What if Palpatine does not want to be rescued...

    1. Re:Not palpable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're planning to apply for the assistant to General Greivous job, aren't you, Captain Obvious?

    2. Re:Not palpable? by texasfight · · Score: 1

      Surgeon General, actually.

  52. It is just me by calbanese · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or does anyone else think that Lucas should spice up Episode III with some breakdancing?

    1. Re:It is just me by obzidian · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking an MC Hammer cameo in those crazy pants as an alien. * It's hammer time on the Dark Side *

      --
      Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    2. Re:It is just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not break dancing. LINE dancing. Every good movie has line dancing. For Example.

      Scooby Doo 2.

    3. Re:It is just me by rob_squared · · Score: 1
      Two words:


      Lightsabre Limbo!

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:It is just me by Kid_Korrupt · · Score: 1

      Breakin 3: Electric Wookie!

  53. Stop being an apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whining, hell. Well-deserved mocking is more like it.

  54. Blah blah by LSD-OBS · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yadda yadda

    Just kill Jar Jar FFS!

    --
    Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
  55. "You WILL!" by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thanks to the Internet, you'll see Star Wars Episode III before that sad git camping out in line for tickets. /Tom Selleck

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:"You WILL!" by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is the one movie that has to be seen in a theater instead of a computer monitor.

      Say what you want about Lucas, but the man knows his special effects.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:"You WILL!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Actually, this is the one movie that has to be seen in a theater instead of a computer monitor.

      I'll see it at home where I can turn the volume down a bit during the battles, thanks.

    3. Re:"You WILL!" by the31337z3r0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In a manner of speaking, he knows them TOO well. The original trilogy (4, 5, 6) used models as opposed to CG. In my opinion, the models were MILLIONS of times more convincing than the CG in the past two movies. It's almost as if he's stretching the CG too far.

    4. Re:"You WILL!" by Glsai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't have mod points so you'll have to deal with a verbal mod up. I rewatched the original trilogy (as almost everyone else did when they were put out on DVD) and watching the end of Return of the Jedi as Luke is battling with the Emperor, one thing I noticed is how real it seemed. No matter how many green screens and CGI you do, it just doesn't seem to give the real feeling that seeing actual props do. Now using CGI for the backgrounds instead of matte painting works nicely, but for foreground elements it just looks much better with models.

    5. Re:"You WILL!" by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      funny you mention that...

      the other day I was thinking the same while watching the old Battlestar Galactica.... While the new CG looked cooler, the old models looked more "real" I thought.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    6. Re:"You WILL!" by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I think it was because they could actually vary the battle damage easier with a fleet of models. The *best* thing, back in the 1970s, about SW and BG vs ST was that everything on Star Trek always looked brand spakin' new (in TNG and beyond the explaination was that everything popped out of a replicator- and they're doing much better with Enterprise on this aspect despite the CGI). Star Wars X-wings and A-wings *looked* like they were cobled together by rebels on the run, and BG vipers in the 1970s LOOKED like they were the product of a human civilization where everybody lived to be 200 and was on the run from the Cylons all the time. The moddern BG suffers from only having two full-size mockups for filming viper cockpit scenes, as well as the viper Mark VIIs that look like the cartoonist from The Jetsons invaded Colonial Fleet Design....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:"You WILL!" by buswolley · · Score: 1

      That post didn't encounter the lameness filter?

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    8. Re:"You WILL!" by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Now using CGI for the backgrounds instead of matte painting works nicely, but for foreground elements it just looks much better with models.

      Bah. I've had people insist that money from France (let alone the Neitherlands) looked 'like monopoly money' and that they'd hate it if the USA changed. That the USA's money is only now becomming somewhat sophisticated is largely because of this attitude against change.

      It's jarring to see the glitches in the space battle scenes for Jedi -- let alone the ancient Ewok costumes. They both work aginst the movie for me -- and I remember seeing Star Wars when it came out in the theaters the first time.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  56. Yes, that's the point. by Farrside · · Score: 1

    Thanks for reinforcing it!

  57. New and improved Palpatine... by texasfight · · Score: 1

    Now with extra mitochondria, or mitichlorians, or mitten chlorine, or some dumb a$$ thing.

    Geez lucas, how far you have fallen...

    1. Re:New and improved Palpatine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will learn why that midichlorian dialogue was present when you discover in Episode 3 that Qui-Gon is actually an embodiment of the force (think Jesus = God in the flesh).

  58. You're not the first to think of Count Dookie by tepples · · Score: 1

    what a terrible name "Hello Dooki...i mean dooku"

    You're not the first.

  59. I don't thin that Word means... a:Crawler Text by HiredMan · · Score: 3, Informative
    As the Separatist Droid Army attempts to flee the besieged capital with their turgid hostage

    TURGID
    [adj] abnormally distended especially by fluids or gas; "tumescent tissue"; "puffy tumid flesh"

    Unless Lucas himself is playing Chancellor Palpatine I'm not sure how this description applies. Is it really necessary to point out that the guy is really fat in opening crawl?
    Either that or "turgid" is sometimes used as an oblique reference to having a stiffy... and that REALLY doesn't need to be in the opening crawl, IMHO.

    =tkk

    1. Re:I don't thin that Word means... a:Crawler Text by PepeGSay · · Score: 1

      It has other meanings as well: excessively embellished in style or language

    2. Re:I don't thin that Word means... a:Crawler Text by CaptainBaz · · Score: 1

      Turgid.

      adj 1: ostentatiously lofty in style; "a man given to large talk"; "tumid political prose" [syn: bombastic, declamatory, large, orotund, tumid]

  60. Predictable by antiaktiv · · Score: 1

    So, who else can already figure out exactly what's going to happen? It doesn't exactly take a phd in narratology to "predict".

    1. Re:Predictable by manifoldronin · · Score: 1
      So, who else can already figure out exactly what's going to happen?

      Well, since when did the SW series become thrillers?

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
  61. Holy... by jalefkowit · · Score: 5, Funny

    He actually named a bad guy "General Grevious"???

    What a breathtaking lack of creativity. I look forward to seeing his counterpart on the other side, Major Niceguy.

    1. Re:Holy... by dpilot · · Score: 2, Funny

      He was promoted from one of the Other 4 Motorcyclists of the Apocolypse, along with his friends, Things That Need a Really Good Thumping, (mumble), and (mumble, haven't re-read Good Omens recently enough).

      Oh, Grevious is really short for Grevious Bodily Harm.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:Holy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes how shocking from a guy who named is hero Skywalker and his outlaw 'Han Solo'... I mean I love the orginal Star Wars movies. I grew up with them, but this doesn't actually mark as much of a change as you seem to think.

    3. Re:Holy... by mattgorle · · Score: 1

      If I had points, matey, you'd have 'em...

      Haven't read that in ages!!

      Anyway, for your reference purposes, the motorcyclists are:

      - Grievous Bodily Harm

      - Cruelty To Animals

      - Things Not Working Properly Even After You've Given Them A Good Thumping (secretly No Alcohol Lager)

      - Really Cool People

      Cheers!

      --
      Slackware user since 1997.
    4. Re:Holy... by Geekenstein · · Score: 1

      Hey, what about the hero of that other Sci-Fi epic, Battlefield Earth? You know, "Johnny Goodboy"? Maybe they use the same writers. The storyline quality is about the same.

      Now that I've admitted to watching BE, I'm going to go hide.

    5. Re:Holy... by p3d0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, that's way worse than "Skywalker" or "Solo" or "Organa" or "Sidious" or "Maul".

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    6. Re:Holy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if "Mon Calamari" is GOOD, for an alien with a squidlike head?

    7. Re:Holy... by pete-classic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Just this morning I metioned that I'd need to plan a trip around the release date. After seeing the trailer with Vader rising on the table I was really stoked to see this movie.

      But between the fact that I couldn't get past the first word (and punctionation mark) for, like, two minutes due to the song it evoked rattling around in my head, and the Grevious thing my travel plans may be flexible after all.

      -Peter

    8. Re:Holy... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but no new news since June 2002 about the movie. We can always hope.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    9. Re:Holy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As another poster said already, excellent reference. I haven't thought of that book in a couple of years so now I'm going to have to go dig that up and read it again.

      Sometime down the road you're going to get modded insightful or informative on a future post. It will be a makeup mod for the points I don't have to give at the moment

    10. Re:Holy... by Khomar · · Score: 1

      I had a slight bit of interest left in this film before I read this text. Now I am completely appalled. I have no desire to see this movie or give Lucas another dime of my money.

      In order to send the message to Lucas that we expect more from our movies, I suggest that we all have a Lord of the Rings trilogy marathon in our respective cities on the opening weekend of Star Wars. This way we will all get to see a truly great set of films that retain good acting, a great script, and truly phenominal special effects -- all of which should have been in Star Wars.

      Seriously, we should boycott this film and send the message that we won't settle for mediocre films.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    11. Re:Holy... by cei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're suprised? Considering "Vader" is dutch for "father"???

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    12. Re:Holy... by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Or Calamari...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    13. Re:Holy... by dswensen · · Score: 1

      Yeah... hope they don't make it.

    14. Re:Holy... by toganet · · Score: 1

      Don't forget:

      Palpatine (Sounds like a touchy-feely knight)
      Midichlorians (Let's see, they live inside cells, and they come from your mother. Could that be "mitochondria")
      I could go on, but I've laready wasted more characters than Lucas did justice to.

    15. Re:Holy... by LookSharp · · Score: 1

      Seriously, we should boycott this film and send the message that we won't settle for mediocre films.

      Even if you convince a thousand people to agree, that is a drop in the bucket compared to the loot Lucas will bring in via the millions of sheeple who will pay for (and pay for again) anything Star Wars...

      Good luck. Me? I'll go so it once, and buy the DVD. I have the other 5, how am I going to explain the mssing disc to my son when he goes to watch them?

    16. Re:Holy... by Khomar · · Score: 1

      Toss the first two and pretend they don't exist... :-)

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    17. Re:Holy... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I think Terry Gilliam could have done it justice. Too bad he's out of the running, but maybe he'll come back.

      I guess I'm not sure anyone but Terry Gilliam could do the job, in which case I sort of agree with you.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    18. Re:Holy... by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Or, you could go get yourself a life.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  62. Stop Lucas before he kills again! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    "General Grievous was developed for Episode III as a powerful new villain "...

    Who will be killed off by the second reel.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  63. parody by jmaxwell39648 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Check out this parody of Episode III. The guy did some nice work. Looks like everything is green screen. Funny as hell. http://www.sequentialpictures.com/moviestarwarsepi sode3.html

  64. Oh no! They lost the galaxy! by True+Freak · · Score: 1

    In case I was the only one that noticed:
    This is the only episode thus far that does not have the word "galaxy" somewhere within the crawl text.

    --
    My comments may be crap...but they are my crap...and I am brave enough to stand by them...Never post as AC!
  65. Hello? Lord of the Rings ripoff?? by b-diddy1434 · · Score: 1

    Wow, George Lucas is that lame that he has to go steal ideas from the Lord of the Rings?

    Lets see:
    One Ring--> Crystal
    Saruman--> Palpatine
    Mount Doom --> Lava pit?
    does that make yoda gollum? "my precious they stoles, yes"

    1. Re:Hello? Lord of the Rings ripoff?? by ksaylor · · Score: 1

      LOtR reference? No, I believe it is a reference to the Dark Crystal.

    2. Re:Hello? Lord of the Rings ripoff?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Frank Oz has finally turned to the dark side after the death of his master?

  66. 4-5-6, then 1-2-3 (optional) by hsoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would watch 4-5-6 first because if you watch 1-2-3 before 4-5-6, the big punch "Luke... I AM..." in ep5 will be spoiled because you saw ep3.

    Yes, SW should be more enjoyable in the 456123 order, or better in the 456 order.

    Hey, why not trying 654321? It must be fun :)

    --
    perception is reality
    1. Re:4-5-6, then 1-2-3 (optional) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. So would the siblings thing, the Ben lying thing, the mysterious emperror thing...

      Oh, and would you really want to hear about midichlorians at the beginning of the story?

    2. Re:4-5-6, then 1-2-3 (optional) by ezeri · · Score: 1

      Given the extent to which that line has been parodied, he would have to be living in a cave to not already know. Since there is no longer any spoiler to it, just treating the two trilogies as seperate but watching them individualy in order, ie 123 and 456, should do fine either way.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now. - Ed Howd
  67. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...which would make the first line of the crawler SO much better (and sinister..):

    "Ass! The Republic is crumbling under attacks.."

  68. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a remix

  69. Why have the new trilogy char names been so bad? by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read an interview once where George said that he lets his kids name that characters...

    Hence: Jar Jar, Dooku, Grievous, Elan Sleazebaggo (don't believe me? look it up), etc.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
  70. I wonder... by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    is Lucas paying off any of these line-sitters to hype his movie?


    Who, me, cynical?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  71. Yes, you're one of the few. by Augusto · · Score: 1

    It's cool to bash the prequels, but at the end of the day, geekdom is going to show up and watch them. You may be honest in not wanting to go, but I guarantee you that all 95%+ of these "SW prequel trilogy sucks" zombies is going to stand in line and watch them.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Yes, you're one of the few. by thegnu · · Score: 1

      I still haven't been convinced I'm a zombie. See you in the theater, bitch! :-)

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  72. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by eddy · · Score: 1

    Those aren't the correct lyrics. Here you go:

    war
    war never been so much fun
    war never been so much fun
    go to your brother, kill him with your gun
    leave him lying in his uniform, dying in the sun
    war

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  73. no continuity between 3 & 4 by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    The continuity betweeh 1,2,3 and 4,5,6 is OK, but from 3 to 4 is a huge breach.

    The gap between the Queen of Naboo and Dookie and the Rebellion and Leia is jarring. Where did this 'rebellion' and civil war come from? 3 is mostly about a universal shift of alliances -- think NATO and Warsaw Pact -- due to trade inequity (1 & 2). Now we're at civil war? Who is rebelling against whom? Has the 1,000 solar system rift (2) oppressed the other 1,000's of systems?

    There's no way in hell Ep3 is going to link to Ep4 with any shred of continuity.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:no continuity between 3 & 4 by rebewt · · Score: 1

      Oh come now! There will be lots of continuity once Lucas finishes bastardizing ^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h fixing the original trilogy!

  74. In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LucasFilm has received a Cease & Desist letter from the MPAA.

  75. There is hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is one way the new episodes can be redeemed. If Jar Jar dies a extremely violent, painful and blood filled death. It would all be worth it then.

  76. ''Turgid Hostage'' ! by Odd+John · · Score: 4, Funny

    ''As the Separatist Droid Army attempts to flee the besieged capital with their turgid hostage''

    Turgid hostage!

    Did Senator Palpatine get a woody while being held down ?

    Turgid:

    1. Excessively ornate or complex in style or language; grandiloquent: turgid prose.

    2. Swollen or distended, as from a fluid; bloated: a turgid bladder; turgid veins.

    On the other hand you can say that all the Lucas movies are turgid.

    1. Re:''Turgid Hostage'' ! by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's odd. When I looked at it just now, it says "valuable hostage". I guess they changed it?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  77. Wrong! by jspoon · · Score: 4, Funny
    One would think that 'vague direction' and 'a lot of explorations' would come up with something innovative. But, as can be seen from the picture, what do we have?

    A droid, in the shape and likliness of a human, holding two lightsabers. I mean honestly!

    Oops! You didn't study the picture closely enough. Gen. Grievous is clearly wielding not two but THREE lightsabers. Let's all raise our voices to congratulate Mr. Lucas for striking off in this radical new direction.

    1. Re:Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fuck everything, we're doing 5 lightsabers.

  78. Last part of the crawl... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    And the last part of the crawl is.

    You'll laugh!

    You'll cry!

    You'll kiss ten bucks goodbye!

    GET IN LINE NOW!

    1. Re:Last part of the crawl... by saddino · · Score: 1

      Cool. I wonder how many people will get that reference.

      "But it's a peaceful basketball!"

    2. Re:Last part of the crawl... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      "But it's a peaceful basketball!"

      "Did you feel a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced?"

      "No, it's just a little headache."

      And the original reference was just three bucks... Inflation, ya know...

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    3. Re:Last part of the crawl... by Captain+Fallout · · Score: 1

      "Huh?"
      "You pull the plug!"

      Have to find my old tape of that somewhere now.

    4. Re:Last part of the crawl... by dbretton · · Score: 1


      "I must find that tractor beam..."
      "Ah, there it is!" (sees tractor cartoon)

    5. Re:Last part of the crawl... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      Have to find my old tape of that somewhere now.

      I've got the DVD version. While it didn't have the "special edition" edits made for the final VHS release, it had all sorts of extra material, like commentaries and a "Director's cut" of real outtakes from the original filming. Really wierd... especially since the DVD I have is marked Region 5 even thought it's a Region 1 (or regionless) disc.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  79. Simpsons opening text spoof? by British · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the Simpsons episode that basically trashed ep1?

    Their opening text for the star wars film in the episode was incredibly obfuscated, and hilarious.

    Another good part was when the AT-AT crashed through the conference, and then sat there like a dog, waiting for the roll call to finish.

  80. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lucas just might have replaced it with "Ass!"

    No point in giving away the film in the first ten seconds.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  81. Here is the crawl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linley's Dungeon Crawl http://www.dungeoncrawl.org/

    or, of course,

    Star Wars Asciimation http://www.asciimation.co.nz/

  82. Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To all the morons whining about how bad this movie is going to be, remember it was made for children in the first place

  83. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He could just start it with


    Suckers ! You guys fell for it a third time...

  84. ROFL by hsoft · · Score: 1

    Completely Hilarious. I rarely seen a parody of this quality.

    --
    perception is reality
  85. Ahem.... by StressGuy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Colin Powell...

    That's all I'm going to say....I'm sure you can all write your own jokes....

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  86. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    Seriously, with the way the new crawl starts with the word "War!", Lucas just might have replaced it with "Ass!" or something else asinine.

    OK, so you're joking some. But actually, in keeping with the sort of "newsreel" tone of the exposition in those crawls, which harken back to old cinema serials, that's pretty much dead on. It echos WWII newspaper headlines in succinctness punch. I actually kind of like it. Of course, after that first word, it goes completely downhill. General Grievous? Oh, man...

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  87. Not spicy enough for todays audiences... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 3, Funny



    Note to Scroll Writing Staff:

    Please rework Scroll to include the phrase "hot space-monkey nookie".

    Please, no Wookie-Nookie jokes.

    THX, GL

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
    1. Re:Not spicy enough for todays audiences... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny
      "hot space-monkey nookie"

      You are thinking of the remake of Planet of the Apes.
      In which case it is better phrased:
      Bong smoking space-monkey from the future nookie.

    2. Re:Not spicy enough for todays audiences... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Please, no Wookie-Nookie jokes.

      Debbie Does Endor perhaps?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  88. could be worse, actually by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Count Dooku might realize the error of his ways at the last minute and try to kill the emperor?

  89. Re:Oh no! They lost the galaxy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case I was the only one who noticed:

    None of these episodes have the word "Titmouse" somewhere within the crawl text.

  90. The 8 Bikers of the Apocalypse! by khasim · · Score: 1

    Many thanks to Mr. Pratchett.

    Death
    War
    Famine
    Plague
    Grievous Bodily Harm
    Cruelty To Animals
    Things Not Working Properly Even After You've Given Them A Good Thumping but secretly No Alcohol Lager
    and, last but not least ...
    Really Cool People

    So, we have General Grievous....

    Will we see Captain Cruelty? Maybe Lt. Things (alias Lt. Lager)?

  91. Hey! by ColonelPanic · · Score: 1

    What's the problem?

    --
    "Skill shows through where genius wears thin." -Wittgenstein || Religion: uniting aviation and architecture.
  92. It's official... by William_Lee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Star Wars has now become a parody of Space Balls...

  93. No... by Bigthecat · · Score: 1

    I was referring to what is actually going to be in the movie, not the concept art. Looks like Lucas wanted an interesting-looking character, saw the concept and stripped it of both interest and innovation.

    1. Re:No... by Bigthecat · · Score: 1
      Since posting apparently disregarded the images that I included, behold:

      General

      Originality

    2. Re:No... by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 1

      The robot face reminds me an AWFUL LOT of the leader of the Ring Wraiths in the Return of the King...

    3. Re:No... by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      sept the general consept has been laying around since Ep2 a long time before LotR was seen.

      If anything he looks like something Chiang drew for Robota, ALSO written before LotR.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  94. Sounds like by Corellon+Larethian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    a commentary on the Iraq war.

    Go George!

  95. And it's REALLY STUPID by mcc · · Score: 5, Funny

    The opening crawls in the original trilogy served as a method of allowing the movie to open in medias res without the audience having a sense of disorientation. In the latter two movies this included an aspect of establishing that time had passed since the previous movie-- but, no meaningful or potentially interesting-to-watch events were in this way "skipped", it is simply made clear to us that what we expected has occurred in the intervening time (the war continues, Luke continues to train, Vader turned Solo over to Jabba the Hutt) with perhaps one or two little bits of information that alert us as to the movie's focus (the Imperials are known to be building a weapon capable of destroying an entire planet).

    In the prequel trilogies the crawls have served two purposes. The intentional purpose is to allow George Lucas to weasel out of characterization, establishing setting and place, and moving the plot along. Unlike the original trilogies, where the Star Wars universe's background and nature was established incidentally, through subtle details of what we see and hear during the movie, in the prequel trilogies they just use the opening crawl to say "plop, there it is", and disorientingly slam down the characters and setting they wish to put the movie in. After this point, since they seem to consider themselves thus freed from explaining themselves, they completely refrain during the movie from elaborating on the things the opening crawl sketches or filling in details beyond the crawl's bare outline (where is Naboo and why, if in any obvious way, are they important? who is the Trade Federation and why should we care? who is "count dooky", why would someone have heard of him, what does he claim he wants, and why does this all appear to be important to someone who does not know his true aspirations? who is "grevious", how and why is he starting a droid army, and what are the implications of this? most importantly what would the answer to these questions appear to be to someone within the movie-- not us the viewer, to whom the answers are "he's the bad guy and he wants to rule the world", what would an average citizen of the Republic think Dooku to be?) and so use the time freed up within the movie in this way to concentrate on roller-coaster-style but otherwise long, boring and irrelivant action scenes.

    The unintentional purpose of the prequel trilogy opening crawls is to bash you over the head with how stupid all these character names are ("Grevious"? "Dooku"??? I mean come on!), just in case the majesty of John Williams' opening score might otherwise distract you from the suspicion that the entire plotline to the prequel trilogy was written by Lucas's 4-year-old child in a single sitting some years ago in crayon on a napkin.

    1. Re:And it's REALLY STUPID by bilgebag · · Score: 2, Funny

      But Lucas has been using very stupid names since before Star Wars (episode 4, whatever). His original pitch described the film as:

      "the story of Mace Windu, a revered Jedi-bendu of Ophuchi who was related to Usby C.J. Thape, a padawaan leader to the famed Jedi" ...

      Twat.

    2. Re:And it's REALLY STUPID by starrsoft · · Score: 1
      might otherwise distract you from the suspicion that the entire plotline to the prequel trilogy was written by Lucas's 4-year-old child in a single sitting some years ago in crayon on a napkin.

      See above post

      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
    3. Re:And it's REALLY STUPID by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      But Lucas has been using very stupid names since before Star Wars (episode 4, whatever). His original pitch described the film as: "the story of Mace Windu, a revered Jedi-bendu of Ophuchi who was related to Usby C.J. Thape, a padawaan leader to the famed Jedi" ...

      My god, all that's missing is for Nanki-Poo to show up and sing with Pish-Tush and Pooh-Bah.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:And it's REALLY STUPID by bilgebag · · Score: 1

      However, I believe Grevious is the model of a modern (like, major) General.

  96. Youse Guys are giving me a by mykepredko · · Score: 3, Funny

    Major Payne!

    myke

    1. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you meant Major Major Major Major.

      Yossarian!!!

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    2. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by HMA2000 · · Score: 1

      Major Payne is the son of General Electric

    3. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by Milkyman · · Score: 1

      Corporal Punishment!

    4. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      Major Payne was the son of a legendary, yet low ranking sailor, maybe you've heard of him.......

      Seaman Covered?

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    5. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by SoCalEd · · Score: 1

      This thread is wreaking major havoc on my productivity. Major Havoc? Arrrghh...must...play.....MAME machine....

      --
      Insert witty comment *here*. I'm fresh out of wit...
    6. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by wazzzup · · Score: 1

      Ha! Yeah and his cousin is Lieutenant Angrous....errr Sargeant Furio....no, Searg....

      Um. Huh. I guess this thread has been exhausted now hasn't it?

    7. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a Private Matter.

    8. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by Holi · · Score: 1
      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    9. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is Pvt. Parts related?

    10. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by signingis · · Score: 1

      How about Commander... 1st Liutenant... I got nothin.

      --

      I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
    11. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by KanSer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm, it seems one Major Asshole has taken control of Lucasfilm...

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    12. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cousin of Spc. Tickle.

    13. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting his best buds. Professor Chaos and General Disarray!

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    14. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by Altus · · Score: 1


      I like your sig... thats good stuff!

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    15. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best... thread... EVAR!

    16. Re:Youse Guys are giving me a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's an asshole sir. Major Asshole.

  97. seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the deal with everyone using ellipses? You only use an ellipsis when you quote someone and leave something out that isn't contextually needed. So, George Lucas, who the fuck are you quoting when you end your opening crawl? Where people got the idea that it implies "there is more shit involved than i'm revealing" is unknown to me. Just a pet peeve of mine...

  98. The opening scroll ought to be... by KoshClassic · · Score: 1

    A beginning is the time for taking the most delicate care that the balances are correct. This every member of the Jedi order knows. To begin your study of the life of Darth Vader, then take care you first place him in his time: born in the 18th year before the reign of the Galactic Emporer, Palpatine I. And take the most special care that you locate Darth Vader in his place: the planet Coruscant. Do not be deceived by the fact that he was born on Tattoine and lived his first eight years there. Coruscant, the planet known as 'The City Planet', is forever his place.

    --
    Understanding is a three edged sword. - Ambassador Kosh Naranek, Babylon 5
  99. Actual Crawler Text in case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Crawler Text in case of /.ing (Score:2, Informative)
    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 28, @11:33AM (#11504355)

    Episode III
    REVENGE OF THE SITH

    War! The Republic is crumbling under attacks by
    the ruthless Sith Lord, Count Dooku. There are
    heroes on both sides. Evil is everywhere.

    In a stunning move, the fiendish droid leader,
    General Grievous, has swept into the Republic
    capital and kidnapped Chancellor Palpatine,
    leader of the Galactic Senate.

    As the Separatist Droid Army attempts to flee
    the besieged capital with their turgid hostage,
    two Jedi Knights and a brave but clumsy Gungan
    warrior
    lead a desperate mission to rescue the
    captive Chancellor....


    The actual text of the last paragraph is


    As the Separatist Droid Army attempts to flee
    the besieged capital with their valuable hostage,
    two Jedi Knights lead a desperate mission to rescue the
    captive Chancellor....


    But the scary thing is, I actually believed the part about the "brave but clumsy Gungan warrior" until I read the source.

    Does that say something about me (and everyone else who believed it), or something about Lucas?
  100. Excuse me, but... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 1


    ...is this some desparate cry for help?

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
    1. Re:Excuse me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...is this some desparate cry for help?"

      Absolutely!

      "cry for help" -- can we salvage this mess via a blatant crib from another epic saga?

      "desperate" -- my God, when we turn to *Frank Herbert* for something less wooden and pompous...

    2. Re:Excuse me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just say that the author read a bit of Frank Herbert...

    3. Re:Excuse me, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a Dune joke, fucky.

  101. Sith == NERDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You heard me! They should just rename the movie to reflect what it REALLY is.

  102. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're the correct lyrics - to a different song. Did you not get that, or were you trying to be funny?

  103. Jar Jar 2 by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

    Electric Boogaloo?

  104. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Jakhel · · Score: 1

    He should have substituted "EXTREEEEEEEMEEEE!!" for "War!" to give it more appeal to the 16-25 demographic.

  105. "[Jar Jar]? Oh shit, there goes the [movie]." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...a brave but clumsy Gungan warrior..."

    Jar Jar Binks is back. And since he's mentioned in the freaking crawler, he'll probably get more screen time than any other character. Meesa thinks it best to be not going.

  106. Serves as a reminder for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes, another fabulous star wars movie is coming out. yay huzzah wuhoo. I'll just be wandering over to my prefs and filtering out future slash articles on them. That will allow discussions to be filled with the insight of fans who are even more die hard than me. Over and out.

  107. Naboo is obviously important by imrec · · Score: 1

    because that's where they mine spice! wait...

    -
    Poll discussions are way better

    --
    Note: This sig contains nine S's, nine I's and five O's which... means absolutely nothing.
  108. Maul == Grievous? by feelyoda · · Score: 1

    Epi I's stress on Maul can be redeemed if the droid General Grievous is actually darth Maul saved from death.

    He has biological looking eyes, and otherwise it would make no sense to have a droid that can use the force. Why not make the entire droid army have force powers?

    I guess making 0 sense hasn't stopped Lucas in the past.

    --

    Robo-Blogs of the world: UNITE!
    1. Re:Maul == Grievous? by merky1 · · Score: 1

      Sad part is, this would make the movie worth watching, and therefore is autmatically not a possibility.

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
    2. Re:Maul == Grievous? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Well, you know, thanks to episode 1 the force isnt anything mythical anymore, so there would be no problem with robots haveing biobots cultivating those mithoclorians (or what the name is...)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Maul == Grievous? by dowobeha · · Score: 1
      --
      I am concerned about any program, any piece of hardware, any treaty, any law that treats me as a consumer, not a citizen
  109. The most emotional part of the movie for me... by thegnu · · Score: 1

    was the scene where Anakin turns to the dark side and Ben Kenobi gets served.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
    1. Re:The most emotional part of the movie for me... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1


      Obi Wan didn't dance back?

      Man he goit F'd in the A!

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  110. What the hell is a "crawl"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried:

    google.com
    urbandictionary.com
    dictionary.com

    None of the above gave any definition that involved movies.

    So what does this word mean, where did it come from, and why are we assumed to know wtf it is since none of the standard online means of defining terms comes up with anything useful ?

    1. Re:What the hell is a "crawl"? by TFGeditor · · Score: 2, Informative
      It is short for "text crawl."

      According to http://www.e-paranoids.com/c/cr/crawl.html: "In television, a text crawl is a moving line of text usually put at the bottom of the screen. It is generally set up to convey news and up-to-the-minute information about weather and other critical situations. A text crawl is an application of the computer graphics technique of scrolling. Text crawls became standard on news broadcasts in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks."

      Ergo, in this case it is simply a screen-wide vertical text crawl.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  111. Until You See It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm, no. I won't waste my money.

    It sounds like you're going to waste yours, though.

  112. Bad Resolution by White+Roses · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or is the resoltion of that .gif particularly bad? I'd be prepared to swear I see the line "There are herpes on both sides."

    --
    Do not touch -Willie
  113. Re:Why have the new trilogy char names been so bad by Treebeard+the+Ent · · Score: 1

    Elan Sleazebaggo

    He is the death sticks guy. Also, he is Mouse from The Matrix.

    --
    Never argue with an idiot. They will just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.
  114. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by eddy · · Score: 1

    Yes.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  115. Nice summary but... by solomonrex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bush and Thatcher are hardly power-grab dictators with evil schemes. You sound a little bitter to me. 9/11 was the most shocking event since Pearl Harbor. You didn't think we were going to let things go, did you? Even in Iraq? I mean, that worked so well for Clinton- letting Al Qaeda attack the WTC and then not capturing them, not going to war, not increasing security. Lincoln and FDR are closer to your examples, btw.

    1. Re:Nice summary but... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      You, and a number of others, seem to have taken my remark out of the intended context. I meant to imply that both had used wars to bolster their own political position. Thatcher did with the Falklands conflict, she was expected to lose the next election before war was declared. Bush Jr, used Afghanistan and Iraq to distract the electorate from the state of the economy (usually a deciding factor in American politics). I did not mean to imply that either had deliberately created the situations that caused the war, and I certainly didn't want to imply that either of them had masterminded their respective wars on both sides - merely that using a war as a political smokescreen was not a particularly uncommon idea.

      Lincoln and FDR are also good examples, but I thought the average /. reader would have more of a change of remembering either of the examples I gave first hand.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Nice summary but... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure Bush and Thatcher aren't, and weren't, power-grab dictators with evil schemes. Merely because their evil schemes relate more to money than to killing people makes them somehow good? And Clinton was just as evil and power mad. But the real evil is this- we haven't increased security one iota since 9-11. The borders are just as pourous as ever, more illegals are coming across than ever. Iraq has nothing to do with al Qaida aside from a few Iraqi agents eating in the same restaruants in Paris as Mohammed Atta- at least until we attacked, then we drew al Qaida there by giving them a huge fucking target of 150,000 US citizens. Nothing we've done so far in the war on terror has made the United States more safe from another 9-11 style attack, it's all been a waste of taxpayer resources and money.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Nice summary but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the Native Amercans considered the new Europeans to be illegals... see where it got them...

    4. Re:Nice summary but... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the Native Amercans considered the new Europeans to be illegals... see where it got them...

      Still do- and it's getting them the same thing today- resource grabs by corporations causing unemployment and alcoholism to run rampant on the reservations...Cascadians, aka Kwakiutals, aka The First Nation, realize that we are in the position of basically being an occupied and oppressed people, yes. So why should the white Europeans continue to make the same mistake, especially after massive mismanagement of the immigration system allowed 20 hijackers to cross the border despite badly faked passports, incomplete visa application forms, and FBI arrest warrents? Or a million people+ a year to cross the Arizona desert?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Nice summary but... by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

      I mean, that worked so well for Clinton- letting Al Qaeda attack the WTC and then not capturing them, not going to war, not increasing security.

      Clinton was the worst president we ever had 4 years ago. Bush let al Qaeda attack the WTC and then didn't go out and capture them. Where's Osama? Bush did go to war but in the wrong country. Bush has done nothing to increase security... read the 9/11 Commission report if you disagree. The White House's own reports say terrorism has increased since 9/11.

      Then again it's hard to change people's minds no matter how many "facts" you have. Right?

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    6. Re:Nice summary but... by Boronx · · Score: 1
      Not much sense in pointing this out anymore, but Iraq wasn't a threat to US security and didn't have ties to terrorists targeting Americans.

      Bush had plenty of warning about 9/11, more than enough to start kicking some asses around. The lower levels of our intelligence agencies had more than enough info to unravel the plot of only someone had done some ass kicking.

      Bush blew it. Then he tried to cover it up by first opposing, then stonewalling every investigation. Then he cynically used the tragedy, reinforcing unwarranted and destructive fears, to start an illegal war that's resulted in the death and injury of more than 10,000 Americans and killed tens of thousands of innocents.

      No, Bush is no Palpatine. He's a clever fool, but not too foolish for America, it seems.

    7. Re:Nice summary but... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      9/11 was the most shocking event since Pearl Harbor. You didn't think we were going to let things go, did you? Even in Iraq?


      Why are you even mentioning 9/11 and Iraq in the same sentence? They had nothing to with each other until Bush used one to create a war involving the other.

  116. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? (SPOILERS) by GJSchaller · · Score: 1

    The (Old) Republic becomes The Empire. The Rebellion hasn't started (because it has nothing, yet, to rebel against). Dooku is on the side that will become The Empire.

    Minor Clarification - Dooku is on the "rebels" side, even though he's evil and working for Palpatine / Sidious. There's a few people duped into being on the "wrong" side, or who are playing someone else, so you can't really say Dooku is on one side or the other all the way.

    In summary:

    Senator Palpatine is Darth Sidious, the Big Baddie Boss. While they haven't officially announced this or made the conneciton in 1 & 2, it's clear from watching 5 & 6.

    Palpatine / Sidious is playing both sides. He's a nice senator with the best intenitons for the Republic on one side (Palpatine), and the hidden threat (the "Phantom Menace") that is getting everyone to seperate from the Republic on the other (Darth Sidious). End result - with the war, he can grab more power. He forced the vote (through Amadala) that bumped the old leader from the senate, and got himself installed in the spot. Meanwhile, he's aiding the "rebels" (Trade Federation & Seepratists) that are breaking away from the Republic as Sidious.

    Count Dooku is evil, but is being played. He thinks he's bringing down a bad thing and helping the good guys by leading the Seperatists, but he's being tricked by Sidious / Palpatine. There's a scene in Ep 2. where he tries to convince Kenobi that he's doing the right thing, and it's clear he's confused. He's a bad guy because he works for Sidious and is attacking the current government, but he thinks he's doing it for the right reasons.

    What's coming up (Minor Spoiler if you haven't seen 4, 5, and 6 yet):

    Senator Palpatine has already become the leader of the Senate. He will eventually rename it the Empire, and declare himself Emperor. This is backed up by Vader in Episode 4 early on when he says "The Emperor has just dissolved the Imperial Seante, the last remains of the Old Repuplic have been washed away," (or something close) while talking to Leia.

    The Clone Army that was made to help the Republic will eventually become the Storm Troopers that serve the Empire.

    The Seperatist Movement, once led by Dooku & Grevious, will become the Rebellion. The current Bad Guys will become the Good Guys in 4 thru 6, when it's revealed that the Emire went from good to bad under Palpatine / Sidous.

    That should clear it all up. ;-)

  117. They could always have a rave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, it worked for the second Matrix movie!

  118. I would think the reference is blindingly obvious. by abb3w · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The evil that men do lives after them;
    The good is oft interrèd with their bones.
    So let it be with Caesar. The noble Brutus
    Hath told you Caesar was ambitious.
    If it were so, it was a Grievous fault,
    And grievously hath Caesar answered it.
    -- Wm. Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, Act III, Scene ii.

    Given that this is a story of the fall of the Republic and the Rise of the Empire, Lucas' literary allusion here seems to have all of the subtlety of a high-speed halfbrick to the cranium.

    Come on, everyone-- ripping off Shakespeare is a noble literary tradition !

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  119. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tonik health care plan RUULLLLLLEEEEZZZZZZZ!!!!!!

    fucking lameness filter is so... lame.

  120. The word you're looking for is "grievous." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in grief-causing.

  121. Don't view it in Lynx! by fww125 · · Score: 1

    Then you'll really be in BIG trouble.

    1. Re:Don't view it in Lynx! by Captoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they'd probably sentence you to 10 years in a cell with Jar Jar.

    2. Re:Don't view it in Lynx! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd settle for death and wave all appeals before that!

  122. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they won't really be, will they.

    1. Re:But... by pete-classic · · Score: 0

      Probably not.

      Damn you for calling my bullshit, AC. Damn you to hell!

      -Peter

    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah well, I'm stuck in the machine myself. The best "protest" I'll be able to muster is to not watch the movie on the very first day it comes out.

  123. But... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    You forgot the See Amidala's hotness part.

    I, for one, welcome our beautiful Harvard-attending Queen- & Senator-playing overlord.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  124. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? (SPOILERS) by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    I am not convinced by your arguments. Dooku says a few things in favour of destroying the Jedi (hardly the actions of a good guy), and knows about things such as the Death Star. At the end when he talks to Palpatine/Sideous it seems clear that he understands the overall plan. And don't forget that he is a Sith - he has accepted the `power of the dark side,' which seems incompatible with `good' motives. Rather than being played, he is actively involved in playing the other participants in the separatist movement.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  125. Shouldnt this be a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Private Thread

  126. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1
    Speaking of the film being like ass, didn't everyone just love that hip, trendy musical number with all of those CGI singing muppets that run up to the camera and scream that Lucas edited over Jabba's court? Well, it looks like we can expect a repeat of these wonderful, heart-warming CGI song-and-dance numbers in Episode III.

    I think the "Art of Revenge" caption at the top refers to Lucas exacting revenge on Star Wars fans.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  127. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by aeroelastic · · Score: 1

    My first thought was, "In AD 2101, war was beginning!"

    It kind of reads like a bad translation of something ... bad.

    --
    "It doesn't take a rocket scientist" -I guess I should leave then
  128. Info on Grievous by QEDog · · Score: 1

    He appeared in the Cartoon Network Microseries. He is a Cyborg that leads the Droid Army. He was able to fight using up to 3 (yes 3, even with his feet) Lightsabers killing many Jedis in the process.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
  129. Re:Elan Sleazebaggano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/elansle azebaggano/

    Seriously.

  130. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sad thing is, that's probably better than episode III is going to be.

  131. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? (SPOILERS) by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

    "And don't forget that he is a Sith - he has accepted the `power of the dark side,' which seems incompatible with `good' motives."

    that's how the dark side get's ya! it says: "i'm way more powerfull than the light side, but you don't HAVE to use me for evil... use me to do good! it won't hurt....."
    observe Vader tempting Luke on Bespin, he basically gives this speech, or Annakin telling Padme how much he wants a great leader to come and make the senate stop infighting. His heart is in the right place, but the dark side seduces you with evil means that don't justify the righteous ends. (and of course when you come to that end, its no longer the good and just one that you started out with)

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  132. Re:Why have the new trilogy char names been so bad by wuukiee · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's Sleazebagganno.

    ^_^

  133. Defuberation by Hork_Monkey · · Score: 1

    Note to self:

    Never use Roman Numerals when writing in the first person.

  134. Georgie? Is that you? by gosand · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Don't bury the movie till you see it

    Mr. Lucas, is that you?

    Fool me once (Ep I), shame on me.
    Fool me twice (EpII)... uh... can't get fooled again.

    That twit isn't getting any more of my money. For Ep II he only got the rental money, this time he isn't getting squat.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  135. In your by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Private Parts?

  136. DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE WHATSOEVER!!! by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1

    Count Dooku is evil, but is being played. He thinks he's bringing down a bad thing and helping the good guys by leading the Seperatists, but he's being tricked by Sidious / Palpatine. There's a scene in Ep 2. where he tries to convince Kenobi that he's doing the right thing, and it's clear he's confused. He's a bad guy because he works for Sidious and is attacking the current government, but he thinks he's doing it for the right reasons.

    I agree with the GP or GGP or whatever it was - this stuff just doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

    And, for the sake of comity, I'll give you credit for trying your best to make sense of it, but what you've written is every bit as nonsensical as Episode II: Dooku is an evil character who purposefully joins with the evil Sidious to create the evil rebellion [or is it a good rebellion? - in Episode I it started as a tax revolt] that will eventually [and magically] evolve into a good rebellion that will bring down Sidious some twenty years later?

    I'm sorry, but that's just plain nutso.

    The absolutely awesome Episode III wrap-up of this would have been as follows: The Jedi, in their arrogance, follow Palpatine's lead and crush the good rebellion [killing the good Dooku in the process], only to learn, to their horror, that Palpatine was the evil one all along. As soon as Palpatine feels confident in his position, he and Anakin/Vader turn on the remaining Jedi, and kill them in a Pearl Harbor/9-11 holocaust, with only Kenobi & Yoda escaping their wrath.

    But that possibility was ruined by the very last scene of Episode II, where Dooku is clearly portrayed bowing to Palpatine/Sidious as his master.

    1. Re:DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE WHATSOEVER!!! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Sidious is playing his ememies against each other so he can take ultimate power. "Sidious" is the friend of the powerful guilds...the only indepependants with enough collective power to form a new government. "Palpatine" is the "hero" of the republic...benifiting politically from the havoc that "Sidious" and Dooku are sowing.

      Frankly, I think there's more to it than just "Palpatine" == "Sidious" I think one is a clone of the other... Sidious is a foot shorter and much older than Palpatine...

      The goal is that the Emperor will have wiped out the Trade Federation, and depleted the Old Republic of it's forces. The Trade Federation will wipe out all means of cloning, the Republic army will wipe out the droid armies, leaving the Emperor's loyalist in charge with no opposition. It's a "classic" plot, but George just doesn't have the writing chops to pull it off like it should be...but it will LOOK cool!

  137. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is worth reading:

    http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/38/clones1.htm

  138. As if Skywalker is a brilliant name... by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    Or Solo.
    Or Chewie.

    At least he never used "The Starkiller Kid", from an early draft of The Star Wars.

  139. In portuguese... by Nibelungo · · Score: 1

    ...Dooku sounds like "from the asshole(do cú)" I just can't keep a straight face...

    1. Re:In portuguese... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and Sifo Dias sounds like the portuguese to "fucked himself". That's why they changed the names in the subtitles.

  140. ...heros on both sides.... by jzarling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems to be pandering to the "no one is ever wrong" crowd. The beauty of SW was that good and evil were so well defined. The Empire BAD - Rebellion GOOD.

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
    1. Re:...heros on both sides.... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This one phrase was the straw that broke this camel's back. I ain't going.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:...heros on both sides.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong a little moral ambiguity? I prefer not to be pandered to by people who assume that I'm too stupid to be able to consider different possible ethical interpretations of a situation.

      If you're looking for pandering in Hollywood, it's the film-makers who TELL people what's good and bad, not the ones for (horrors!) force you to consider the issue and decide for yourself.

  141. Vader's accent by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
    because if they mess up my favourite childhood villain...
    They just did. They have to account for how his accent changed from an American to an English one, and so far in the trailers we hear Vader answering the Emperor "Yes Masterr?" but with a very slightly supressed pronunciation of the trailing R, kinda like a transatlantic accent. Doesn't quite have the same ring to it as "Yes Masta?"
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Vader's accent by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      I'm a little confused by this post. Darth Vader has always been voiced by an American actor - James Earl Jones - with an American accent. He never had a British accent.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    2. Re:Vader's accent by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      He has the same kind of british accent that Niles and Frasier Crane have....

    3. Re:Vader's accent by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      That's not a british accent. Its a high-American accent, i.e. its American English with all the pronunciation (really, enunciation) rules maxed-out. Its very common amongst people who have taken professional voice training, such as those actors.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    4. Re:Vader's accent by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      No way Jose. Vader's accent was always English to my ears.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    5. Re:Vader's accent by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      I know it's not a british accent, that's my point... I was being ironic

  142. But the Real Question is... by GatesGhost · · Score: 1

    Will this suck more than phantom menace or attack of the clones? I'm going to say its going to be better than menace but crappier than clones. kind of like how jedi was for the first trilogy, but in reverse.

  143. Re:Why have the new trilogy char names been so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a moment, I thought maybe he let his kids write the scripts too - but then I realized, even kids couldn't come up with something *that* bad.

  144. Worst opening crawl... by skofarrell · · Score: 1

    Ever!

  145. And the world waits to find out by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

    and the whole Amidala giving birth to Luke and Leia thing

    And the world waits to find out if the caesarian is done with a lightsaber. Or the episiotomy, if they go that way.

    You know what'd rock? If the babies pop out and they're half-Gungan.

    That'd rock. You'd hear fanboy heads explode all over the world. "Noooo! That's not ... Can't be!... Nooo! Luke and Leia aren't Jar-jar's children!! Nooo!"

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  146. Somebody mod parent up by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

    As possibly the only offense against creativity more dire than naming a bad character "General Grievous" is naming one "Elan Sleazebaggano".

  147. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? (SPOILERS) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the previous poster is -mostly- right. I think he's wrong about the trade federation becoming the good guys of episode 3-6, though. (That would mean the trade federation becomes the rebels, basically)

    I think the trade federation will have nothing to do with the rebel alliance. They're just a convenient pawn for Palpatine to use to start a Civil War. Dooku is with palpatine, but pretending to work for the trade federation mainly as the "stirrer up of shit." His role is to help start the war.

    Once the war is in full swing, Palpatine can essentially take power as emperor.

    Those who realize they've been had (current members of the republic) will disband and form the rebel alliance. (Jimmy smits (Leia's adoptive father.) being a prime example.)

    When dooku reaches out and tells Kenobi this information, I don't think he (Dooku) is confused at all. I think he's purposefully giving the truth (even though it implicates his master) because he knows it will breed doubt in Kenobi's mind, and mistrust. (Bad for a Jedi.) Also, as Kenobi sees Dooku as the bad guy, he won't necessarily buy his statment about Palpatine anyway. It's the classic, tell the truth to service a lie.

    It is, however, correct that the clone troopers will eventually form the Empire's army. They basically have no will of their own, and are order takers, not thinkers.

    My guess is that the prophecy was never that Anakin was going to balance the force in a good way. The prophecy was that he would royally screw people over and balance the force through the downfall of the Jedi order. I think Yodo (and possibly Mace Windu) know this, and therefore were reluctant to let Anakin in. However, they now know that the prophecy is true and cannot be avoided. Therefore, he IS the chosen one, it's just too bad for Anakin that this means he has to essentially become evil, until his Son can somehow redeem him.

    I'm most eager to find out why Qui-Gon doesn't dissapear.

  148. Lucas must be passive-aggressive resentful by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


    He's been locked into this series, in some directorial equivalent of typecasting.

    So in a passive-aggressive attempt at getting even with the damn fanboys who won't let him be, he's self-sabotaging the movies.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  149. George W. Bush is Senator Palpatine by jgardn · · Score: 1

    Yeah, because, you know George W. Bush is Senator Palpatine. Let's look at the similarities.

    * Bush invaded Afghanistan to bring the war to our enemies, establish a democracy in a backwards country, and to overthrow the Taliban, which oppressed women.

    * Palpatine helped the Trade Confederacy invade a world to overthrow a free, peaceful democracy, and depose their duly elected leader.

    * Bush invaded Iraq to overthrow a tyrannical dictator and establish a free democracy.

    * Palpatine overthrew a free republic to establish a tyrannical empire.

    * Bush is working domestically to turn our renting society into an ownership society by extablishing Social Security as a long-term investment.

    * Palpatine chases down Jedi knights who are supposed to protect the common man and ruthlessly kills them.

    * Bush appointed the first black woman to be Secretary of State in our nation's history, opening up a good possibility of having a black woman president in the next decade, given historical precedence.

    * Palpatine turns an honest yet naive boy against his own friends and brings him into his dark circle of evil friends.

    I mean, the similarities are undeniable! George Lucas obviously made these movies at this time to parody George W. Bush!

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    1. Re:George W. Bush is Senator Palpatine by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because, you know George W. Bush is Senator Palpatine. Let's look at the similarities.

      Ok, strawman argument... give it a rest. I never made the comparison, neither did I intend to imply one. I have little respect for the man's approach, but I do actually think he has good intentions.

      Here are some real comparisons:

      1) The "Phantom Menace". Why couldn't that be terrorists? They're an evil that you can't see.

      2) The Republic. That's just any bureacracy on the planet. It's big - doesn't work right anymore, and is full of individuals no longer united on what the want to accomplish. Maybe the UN, or any government, or the IMF. Whatever.

      3) Jar Jar Binks. Ok, that's definitely got to be Bush. Dumb. Talks weird. Good intentions, but ultimately causes the downfall of civilization. :) Kidding, kidding....

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  150. Re:Georgie? Is that you? by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's an old saying on Tatooine -- I know it's on Naboo, probably on Tatooine -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again.

    - Darth Doobyu

  151. Frames from the opening crawl by inkswamp · · Score: 1
    A friend of mine took the wording and created images of the opening crawl. They're online if any of you are interested and he created them big enough to use as wallpapers.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/daveward/

    Incidentally, he researched this very carefully and the type face is exact (found interviews with LucasFilm folks where the font are discussed.) He also did very meticulous work getting the perspective of the text, the color and the leading correct. It's not the real thing, but it sure looks like it.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  152. The bigger picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rebellion, evil empire, both ingredients to historical soup.
    When a power comes to be, there is always a rebellion. I fail to see what makes the rebellion good and the empire bad in star wars. It is for the benefit of all the speciesin the 1000's of systems involved for the political/culturally dominant landscape to change and grow. the rebellion is clinging to the old ways that harbor and almost nurture the impending doom of corruption. absolute power corrupts absolutely. this is the underlying meaning in the starwars trilogy. There must have been hundreds of thousands of jobs created to get the rolling space fleet up and running. not to mention maintenance and reconstruction efforts (clerks reference - Episode V) Think of the thousands of people that died on the deathstar that were innocently there, not aware of the intent of the leaders. And what of this intent? control by fear. fear of destruction of planets. we are controlled by fear in our societies here on earth, but it is only the destruction of this planet that we worry about. If we are the only intelligent species ever, and we self destruct, then the universe loses its only hope of life anywhere. (who really believes that is walking around with eyes closed.)
    The larger an empire becomes the better it is for all life! no, no, its true. So what if a few hundred or thousand people are inconvenienced in their short little lives. The amount of productive work that can be the output of a large empire outweighs our little "i want my personal freedoms back" complaints. hail the empire. kill al queda.

  153. ...couple more. by Psyqlone · · Score: 1

    1. Mace Windu gets killed.

    2. Boba Fett kills him.

    1. Re:...couple more. by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      According to Supershadow (yeah, I know, not the most reliable source) Anakin kills Windu.

  154. ...just a hunch. by Psyqlone · · Score: 1

    We find out who Anakin's father really is.

  155. Re:Why have the new trilogy char names been so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the brazilian portuguese version of the movie, they changed the name of Count Dooku to Count Dookan, because the original name sound like "from the ass" (do cú - which is quite appropriate, considering the new episodes).
    Oh, the ironies...

  156. Re:Georgie? Is that you? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    That twit isn't getting any more of my money. For Ep II he only got the rental money, this time he isn't getting squat.

    It'll be on Fox for Christmas 2006.

    I caught that latest Star Trek on a free movie weekend on Starz or something. I'm not sure if I saw the ending or if I fell asleep, but I lost interest with Patrick Stewart prostituting himself on a nonsensical SUV chase. I paid the appropriate amount of money to see that one and SW3 will be the same.

    There could be some neat special effects worth seeing.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  157. Think about this... by IdJit · · Score: 1

    Put all six of the crawls in order (by episode number) and read it as one long continuous story...Then ask yourself one question:

    Would I really care about seeing this story on film?

  158. Re:I would think the reference is blindingly obvio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I thought I had too much free time!

  159. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? (SPOILERS) by angle_slam · · Score: 1

    The Separatist movement has nothing to do with the rebellion. It is a ploy by Sidious and Dooku to give power to Sidious.

  160. elitist star wars zealot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't get me wrong, but they are all losers

  161. OH MY FUCKING GOD by popo · · Score: 1


    It already sucks.

    Why Why WHY!?! Why are you writing "political drama"?

    Why is that good?

    I can't help reading the clearly written, simple crawlers from the 4-6 trilogy and wondering how on earth the same person could have written the confused, uninteresting plots of the 1-3 trilogy.

    Considering I spent decades of my life being a Star Wars freak ... I'm hilariously uninterested in seeing this drivel.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  162. Battlestar Galactica vs. Star Wars by popo · · Score: 1

    How Ironic that 25 years later I find myself once again thinking: "God its really incredible that Battlestar Galactica might have a more compelling storyline than Star Wars, and they spent a fraction of the pricetag."

    Actually, it wasn't really true back then. Star Wars ultimately proved to have a far more enduring and compelling storyline. This time around however -- things have changed. There's no comparison. BG's storyline is infinitely superior to episodes 4-6.

    Just goes to show you George, all the special effects in the world can't top a well written script.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  163. So, from reading that he's doesn't know the force? by Sark666 · · Score: 1

    I would think, even in a hugh robotic biosuit, he would still need the force on his side to beat jedi. Or is he just killing jedi with sheer might? Can't recall if they showed any force powers from him in the toon, but I don't think so.

  164. Give you money to BioWare! by LilMikey · · Score: 1

    Stop wasting your money on Lucas' wayward comical views of the StarWars universe. These guys really know what they're doing. Great story and great characters... Sure, it's a game that will take 40 hours to extract the story instead of 2 but at least you'll enjoy yourself.

    At this point I'd rather see a movie about Revan and Malak than the misery that will be Episode III.

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  165. Darth Vader in the cafeteria? by mveloso · · Score: 1

    It's not in the clip, but I've always wondered what life would be like in the death star's cafeteria.

    "I'd like a hamburger and fries, please"
    "Would that be all, Lord Vader?"
    "And some chocolate milk. Yummy!"

    I loved the "From the office of the Emperor" stationary. Nice touch!

  166. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? (SPOILERS) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    What's coming up (Minor Spoiler if you haven't seen 4, 5, and 6 yet):


    Damn you! I've been holding off on watching episodes 4,5 and 6 until I saw 1 through 3. Twenty five years I've been avoiding all Star Wars movies, games, toys and books. Twenty five years I had to leave the room when the discussion turned to Star Wars. ALL RUINED BY YOUR CARELESS SPOILER!

  167. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the fake headline from "The Onion" of a WWII era newspaper. The headline in giant font covering the width of the paper was "WA-" followed by a small sub-heading "Headline continued on next page"

  168. Re:I would think the reference is blindingly obvio by xfmr_expert · · Score: 1

    Lucas' literary allusion here seems to have all of the subtlety of a high-speed halfbrick to the cranium
    I must haved ducked... English geeks are the worst kind of geeks.

  169. Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Lucas, is that you?

    Fool me once (Ep I), shame on me.
    Fool me twice (EpII)... uh... can't get fooled again.

    That twit isn't getting any more of my money. For Ep II he only got the rental money, this time he isn't getting squat.


    I couldn't agree more.

    I watched a half hour of Ep II downloaded from the internet, and promptly deleted the file (posted anonymously for obvious reasons). Thankfully I was spared the long lines at the cinema, and sitting through two hours of the horrible crap.

    I will not be buying any more Star Wars sets (I have two different LaserDisc sets of the first 3 movies made, IV, V, and VI, so while I never was one to watch star wars "thirty-eight times!," I did enjoy the movie and prior to Ep I looked forward to their releases. Despite VI's rather disappointing storyline.

    Ep I sucked and I resented the money spent to see it. Ep II sucked even worse, and I rejoiced in filesharing for having given me the heads up. Ep III will be neither downloaded for preview purpose nor seen at the cinema. I'll probably switch away from it when stumbling over the tripe channel surfing, as I do eps I and II.

    That twit won't be getting any more of my money, either.

    1. Re:Amen by Proc6 · · Score: 1

      I watched a half hour of Ep II downloaded from the internet, and promptly deleted the file (posted anonymously for obvious reasons). Because the MPAA has teams of robots that scour Slashdot posts for mention of copyright infringment, then file for search and seizure warrants against Slashdot to obtain your IP, then your cable company to obtain your real name, then kick down your door and take all your stuff and hope the files you deleted can still be pulled off of erased sectors so they can FINE YOU!

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  170. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? (SPOILERS) by jafac · · Score: 1

    The way to tell if Dooku is evil:

    Check his pad for a Palantir.
    If it's got a flaming lidless eye, the Dark Lord has turned him to evil.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  171. Re:I would think the reference is blindingly obvio by xfmr_expert · · Score: 1

    Shit...and I made a typing error, too. OK, let me have it.

  172. War! What is it good for? by syousef · · Score: 1

    War! What is it good for?

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  173. That's not new. by EarwigTC · · Score: 1

    The characters have always been named with blatant reference to their looks, their role in the story, or assorted literary allusions. Han Solo the roguish cowboy, Greedo the green criminal, Darth Vader the Dark Father. In a sense, the names are a big element of the story, because they convey additional background for the viewer in what are generally fast-paced movies.

    --
    Promote civility: mod down any post starting with 'ummm'.
  174. It Wasn't Tartakovski by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

    You're sort of close, but PPG wasn't created by Genndy Tartakovski, it was created by Craig McCracken. Genndy created Dexter's Laboratory, which McCracken also worked on however. Personally, I find that Grievous is more closely related to Samurai Jack anyway, another Tartakovski show.

  175. FULL TEXT (SPOILER ALERT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    EPISODE III
    REVENGE OF THE SITH

    War! The Republic is crumbling
    under attacks by the ruthless
    Sith Lord. Count Dooku
    There are heroes on both sides.
    Evil is everywhere

    In a stunning move, the
    fiendish droid leader, General
    Grievous, has swept into the
    Republic capital and kidnapped
    Chancellor Palpatine, leader of
    the Galactic Senate

    As the separatist Droid Army
    attemts to flee the besieged
    captital with their valuable
    hostage, two Jedi Knights lead a
    desperate mission to rescue the
    captive Chancellor....

  176. Re:I would think the reference is blindingly obvio by abb3w · · Score: 1
    Lucas' literary allusion here seems to have all of the subtlety of a high-speed halfbrick to the cranium
    I must haved ducked...

    Perhaps not. "Some fellows need to be hit with a brick. Some fellows you need to hit with a big brick." Martya Koudekelda in Lois McMaster Bujold's "Memory".

    English geeks are the worst kind of geeks.

    "All I know is what I read in science fiction." It might count for less in that I remember the speech mainly from Sparky's bathtub scene in John Varley's "The Golden Globe." Now that book was an example of ripping off Shakespeare with class!

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  177. Re:I would think the reference is blindingly obvio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, and to think, just yesterday I was talking to someone about finding meaning in crappy works where there is in fact no meaning whatsoever.

  178. MOD PARENT UP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I completely fucking agree. Knights of the Old Republic was excellent. I mean, the story wasn't the greatest and there were some really fucking far fetched plot devices, but it was an outstanding game. In relation to these "prequels", Bioware came up with a decent story.

    Mod the parent up, because he's right on.

  179. Re:TRINITY DIES AT THE END OF EPISODE III!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Alderan was really a computer trying to find the question to 42.

  180. Re:I would think the reference is blindingly obvio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, everyone-- ripping off Shakespeare is a noble literary tradition !

    Yes... that's why Shakespeare ripped off Plautus for his comedies. Julius Caesar is derived from Plutarch.

  181. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by doughmein_dot_net · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of what Dan Rather used to say:

    "Courage!"

    (except that was at the end of the broadcast...)

    --
    Super ninja monkeys will one day rule the world!
  182. Re:Can someone explain something(s)? (SPOILERS) by Lonath · · Score: 1

    When dooku reaches out and tells Kenobi this information, I don't think he (Dooku) is confused at all. I think he's purposefully giving the truth (even though it implicates his master) because he knows it will breed doubt in Kenobi's mind, and mistrust.

    Or...maybe he's giving Kenobi the truth so they can join forces and overthrow the emporer. (Like Vader's first offer to Luke upon revealing WhosYerDaddy.) I guess these No. 2 baddies are always plotting to become No. 1.

  183. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "War. War never changes" would have been much better than a simple "War!"

  184. HOT STEAMING PILE III: Revenge of the Dooku! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (cue bad-ass march of the Imterials)
    (cue deep, airy voice-over guy)

    He's coming for you. He's powerful. He's agile. He can twist your teat just by thinking about it.
    His name...(cue giant ripping record sound) ...is Dooku.

    They won't even have to rename the parody, I tell you. Jeez.

  185. Re:War! Huh! Hey! What is it good for? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    I'll just say one thing about that link you just provided: It's a trap!

  186. Joking, right? by k98sven · · Score: 1

    Um, you are joking right? Since someone modded this 'insightful', it's hard to tell.

    Why is 'grievous' capitalized in your quote? It's not a name, it's an adjective, 'grievous' means 'regretful'.

    A single common (albeit not as common in modern english) word hardly qualifies as a 'reference' by any stretch of the imagination. And hardly as an unsubtle one.

    But if we were to assume it is a reference to the Bard, what makes you think it's a reference to Julius Ceasar?

    It could be "Richard II": Old John of Gaunt is grievous sick, my lord or perhaps:
    The commons hath he pill'd with grievous taxes..

    or "Richard III": By Christ's dear blood shed for our grievous sins.. and also A grievous burden was thy birth to me..

    or Sonnet 3: Then can I grieve at grievous foregone..

    or "Two Gentlemen of Verona": If lost, why then a grievous labour won..

    or "Henry IV": He cannot come, my lord; he is grievous sick.

    or "Henry VIII": Heard many grievous, I do say, my lord..

    or "Othello": ..a noble ship of Venice Hath seen a grievous wreck..

    It's a quite common word.

    Given that this is a story of the fall of the Republic and the Rise of the Empire, Lucas' literary allusion here seems to have all of the subtlety of a high-speed halfbrick to the cranium.

    So, besides the fact that a single word doesn't qualify as a reference, it's also worth noting that the Shakespeare play 'Julius Caesar' isn't 'the story of the fall of the republic and rise of the empire' at all.

    1. Re:Joking, right? by abb3w · · Score: 1
      Um, you are joking right?

      Half. I think it may well be intended to be an allusion by Lucas; I don't think it's intended to be taken as an overly profound one. Ask me again after the movie comes out, when evidence will exist as to whether it's more than a literary Rorschach blot.

      Why is 'grievous' capitalized in your quote?

      Emphasis, nothing more. Slashdot is full of folk who need a big brick. =)

      It's a quite common word.

      Moderately common in the Bard's work, yes-- poetic forms like iambic pentameter tend to lend frequency to the use of certain words. However, while you are easily able to cite half a dozen uses, none are anywhere nigh as famous-- only "If lost, why then a grievous labour won" even approaches. Hamlet's "To be, or not to be", the bloody Scot's "Sleep" soliloquy, and "The quality of mercy" from The Merchant of Venice are the only ones that spring to mind of comparable stature. Of course, I'm not an English major, nor hardly as scholar of the Bard.

      It's also worth noting that the Shakespeare play 'Julius Caesar' isn't 'the story of the fall of the republic and rise of the empire' at all.

      You are correct, it's would be closer to say that the Fall of the Republic and Rise of the Empire is the setting and context, rather than substance, of the play. The substance is more of the nature of fate, ambition, and the conflicts between public and private morality. All of this also parallels on the one hand, and on the other I wasn't trying for an English paper.

      I'd wouldn't want to try holding it up for a doctoral defense without a documented confession from GL, but I bet I could get a fun English paper out of it after all were I in that business-- and had I read Anthony and Cleopatra as well in the last decade. As a light allusion, this reference seems about the right literary height I'd expect from Lucas.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  187. and there was by Suchetha · · Score: 1

    Major Asshole

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  188. Re:Georgie? Is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you'll be getting it off BitTorrent then?

  189. Models vs. CGI by new500 · · Score: 1

    . . .

    forgive me what is likely a dumb question,

    i agree models look more convincing. if that really is the case, is there a real cost advantage for CGI? I mean so much of an advantage that actors have to imagine their whole environment which numbs performance because of the intellectual overhead?

    As much as you can say about ham - acting in the Trilogy, nothing bored me more than the stultifyingly rigid acting of the prequels to date. I think this is a real byproduct of the CGI environment sets. What i am speculating, albeit wildly, is an analogy with how LOTR was imagined by kids before any film ever came out. I mean, everyone thought differently. So, as so much CGI happens in Post, and actors have only storyboards and sketches to work from, do they compromise by defaulting to a static interpretation, rather than risk being wildly at odds with another's take on the imaginary set? I don't doubt Lucas et.al. have contemplated this at some point in time, but can anyone point me to any public discussion of this issue?

    On a less serious note. Imagine this - getting seriously rich only to find out all your toys have dematerialised. That wold make _me_ want to build more models at any rate :)

  190. it worked for matrix reloaded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or, rather, someone thought it would.

  191. Two points. by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I think there's more to it than just "Palpatine" == "Sidious" I think one is a clone of the other... Sidious is a foot shorter and much older than Palpatine...

    I'm open to the possibility that Palpatine != Sidious, although I'd be shocked if that were to prove to be the case.

    The goal is that the Emperor will have wiped out the Trade Federation, and depleted the Old Republic of it's forces. The Trade Federation will wipe out all means of cloning, the Republic army will wipe out the droid armies, leaving the Emperor's loyalist in charge with no opposition. It's a "classic" plot, but George just doesn't have the writing chops to pull it off like it should be...but it will LOOK cool!

    But that's just WAAAAYYYYY too Byzantine a plot for a single movie, or even a series of three movies.

    I mean, hell, that's too Byzantine for something encyclopedic, like War and Peace. A movie [or series of movies] can withstand at most about one subplot, and the more you strengthen the subplot, the more the movie becomes unwatchable. Scripts need to be simple, forceful, and to-the-point.

    Even a relatively plot-driven movie, like Pulp Fiction [which weighed in at very nearly three hours], had basically one plot [Travolta/Vincent's loyal relationship with Rhames/Marsellus], and one subplot [Willis/Butch's disloyal relationship with Rhames/Marsellus]. If Tarantino had tried to throw in some further twist, such as Rhames/Marcellus playing off Travolta/Vincent against Willis/Butch in some sort of a Machiavellian uber-text, then the whole thing would have become unwatchable.

    Besides, I like my idea of the Jedi's arrogance being their downfall [and Yoda certainly has become one damned arrogant little muppet in these prequels]. Furthermore, introducing Machiavellian themes into Star Wars ruins the appeal of its original premise, which was that it purported to be nothing more than a simple tale of an epic battle between the forces of good and the forces of evil.

  192. Real by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "While the new CG looked cooler, the old models looked more "real" I thought."

    It's the turtle wax, man.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.