Slashdot Mirror


Azureus Decentralizes Bittorrent

BobPaul writes "While the eXeem project to decentralize Bittorrent remains in open beta, the Azureus Java Bittorrent project has recently released a major update that, among other things offers 'a distributed, decentralised database that can be used to track decentralised torrents. This permits both "trackerless" torrents and the maintenance of swarms where the tracker has become unavailable or where the torrent was removed from the tracker.' It doesn't contain the search functionality of eXeem, but it's also not a beta product and is licensed under the GPL. Could this and compatible clients be the replacement to SuprNova and Lokitorrents, or does the lack of search negate its effectiveness?"

672 comments

  1. A step in the right direction... by Lostie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... but the RIAA/MPAA lawyer teams don't need to start hiring again just yet.

    does the lack of search negate its effectiveness?

    I'd say it "limits" it's effectiveness, not negates it. It's not really de-centralized if you still have to rely on sites like suprnova in order to search for stuff, is it? This is a major reason why BitTorrent hasn't completely dominated eMule yet.
    But since this removes another potential point of failure in the network (the tracker), it is still a good thing(tm).

    1. Re:A step in the right direction... by DenDave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A pity these technologies always end up being dissed as being "vehicles of sin" ... I actually hope it works... I download alot of Linux/bsd isos and it's a pain sometimes because of poor mirrors and shitty trackers, however if these swarms appear upon a new release then it makes sense to start downloading during the swarm as opposed to waiting for the rush to pass.

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    2. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is a major reason why BitTorrent hasn't completely dominated eMule yet.

      just a side note...i heard that bt traffic is over 50% of all the internet's traffic.....or does did it meant p2p traffic is over 50% of all the internet's traffic?

    3. Re:A step in the right direction... by tnhtnh · · Score: 0

      Whats the point of having a distributed database if you cannot search it? Exeem is the way to go until RIAA shut it down...

    4. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Be realistic. Yeah, Bittorrent has plenty of legit uses. But do you really think that's what most people use it for? I'd say most are looking for porn, movies, software, etc. Look at it this way, guns can be used to hunt for food. But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people. You can argue about their legitmate use and bad rap 'till you're blue in the face, but the legitmate uses are statistically outweighed by bad ones. The same applies to Bittorrent.

    5. Re:A step in the right direction... by shird · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which you have to ask, why not just use emule/edonkey network?

      Before you say 'wah wah bit torrent is faster', etc, it is only like that because it is centralised and so a tracker can make sure everyone is seeding, there are statistics which encourage people to seed, and most importantly, there are far less files, and so the bandwidth isnt spread out as thinly.

      The more these guys work on decentralising BT, the closer you get to just being a less efficient and less established clone of emule. Whats the point?

      As far as 'warezing' is concerned (99% of traffic), BT is a terrible protocol. The trouble is, these kids see the speed of BT and think thats the way to go. They realise the centralisation is a problem, and so try to fix that. Without realising they are just reinventing the wheel. They think they are going to get the best of both worlds, because they are just warezing kids and don't know any better.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    6. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just glad I got here early, before the Torrent of comments...

    7. Re:A step in the right direction... by mejesster · · Score: 0

      But I wonder what the GNAA lawyers think about all this...

      --
      MacroHard - Boning you in a big way! (TM)
    8. Re:A step in the right direction... by csjavi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Look at it this way, guns can be used to hunt for food. But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      Would you mind giving a reference to that stat? I find it hard to believe.

    9. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is a major reason why BitTorrent hasn't completely dominated eMule yet."

      so, according to you, accounting for 70% of all internet bandwidth isn't "dominating" enough?

    10. Re:A step in the right direction... by mattspammail · · Score: 1

      Unless you prefer not using spyware. Let's not forget that eXeem is laden with some nasty little spyware of its own. eXeem has spyware Another story Use Lite if anything.

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    11. Re:A step in the right direction... by dbretton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      The truth is, you are a liar and a child molestor and you eat babies. How do I know this? I don't, but, like you, I will assert it to be true without providing any supporting information.

      Though I cannot refute your assertion with solid numbers (as the only info I can find is either procured by pro-gun nuts or anti-gun nuts), I can refute it with simple logic.

      The local rod & gun club gets about 50 people per day, averaged out across a seven day week. The reality is that most of the business is on the weekend, but an average is sufficient for this exercise.
      Using your statistic, that means that, in my town alone, there would need to be 5000 shootings DAILY.

      Let's assume the traffic at my local club is average. Since there are approximately 10000 US cities (link), even if only 50% had a rod & gun club, that would mean there would be 250,000 recreational gun uses each day. Assuming this is the 0.01 minority, this means that there would have to be 25 million gun shootings in the US each day. Each year, every one in the US would have been shot... twelve times.

      Now, getting back to BitTorrent. I would tend to agree that BitTorrent is analagous to gun use in that its primary use is recreational in nature. The difference here, however, is that BitTorrent's recreational use is more likely to be illegal in nature than not.

    12. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using a gun on a person does not imply shooting them. Genereally a gun is used to intimidate. Or do you propose that every cop and soldier carries a weapon for hunting?

    13. Re:A step in the right direction... by DenDave · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't see the paralel with guns. Apache webserver can be used to distribute illegal content, it is in many cases, should it then be banned? oh perhaps we should just do away with the internet altogether?

      Guns were built to kill things, software was written to distribute content. Killing things is usually best left to a (legitimate) government who has the monopoly on legitimate use of force. Content is up to the members of society to be done in good taste and within the norms of such society.

      I'd say most are looking for porn, movies, software, etc.
      doesn't, by nature, break the rules, perhaps the problem lies not in the distribution medium but between the chair and the keyboard.

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    14. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mainly acquired to be used against people

      Congratulations, you've proven the point. Despite the fact that the majority of gun use is against people, it's still "perfectly legal" to own them.

    15. Re:A step in the right direction... by Hell+O'World · · Score: 1

      we should just do away with the internet altogether

      shh... don't say that too loud, they are everywhere.

    16. Re:A step in the right direction... by XMyth · · Score: 1

      -1, Troll

      Porn is illegal now?

    17. Re:A step in the right direction... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Now, getting back to BitTorrent. I would tend to agree that BitTorrent is
      > analagous to gun use in that its primary use is recreational in nature. The
      > difference here, however, is that BitTorrent's recreational use is more likely
      > to be illegal in nature than not.

      An excellent refutation of this argument can be found in comment #12418501.

    18. Re:A step in the right direction... by kayen_telva · · Score: 0

      well, the insightful replies to your troll have been posted, so I'll be the flamebait.

      you are a fucking moron.

    19. Re:A step in the right direction... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Look at it this way, statistics can be used to back up a sensible argument. But the truth is, 99% of statistics are made up on the spot.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    20. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn is not necessarily illegitimate. I have the impression that many porn sites don't mind their content being on trackers every now and then, as they all have their logos in the files and get plenty of free advertising that way. If they do mind, the guys at 'empornium.us' ban these torrents and that was that.

    21. Re:A step in the right direction... by standbypowerguy · · Score: 1, Funny

      Only the clueless would use Bittorrent for illicit downloads. The user's public IP address is exposed.

      --
      This isn't the sig you're looking for... Move along.
    22. Re:A step in the right direction... by mrjive · · Score: 4, Funny

      ObSimpsons:

      Kent: Mr. Simpson, how do you respond to the charges that petty vandalism such as graffiti is down eighty percent, while heavy sack-beatings are up a shocking nine hundred percent?
      Homer: Aw, people can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. Forty percent of all people know that.

      --
      If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
    23. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90% of gun use is probably against targets, which is good if we ever get invaded by aliens which look like targets we'll be sorted :)

    24. Re:A step in the right direction... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wrong analogy , i prefer this one .Guns Are designed to kill, which can be used to kill prey for food or murder.
      So there is still a fairly just debate over the fact that guns are by nature evil .
      Bittornet is designed to take the load off of server , and by its nature is good .
      However there is an argument that it can be used to help people download infringing materials.

      So Guns are designed to kill , Torrent are designed to aid.

      many people use guns for legitimate reasons such as Hunting for food or to cull an animal population.
      Guns are also used by murderers to murder people .

      Many people use bittorent for legitimate reasons such as downloading files that are not copyright infringments in their country!
      Torrents can be used for a slightly negative reasons, IE Infringment by those scurvy Infringers of the High seas.

      So to sum it up ,
      at best , guns kill for food at worst guns kill.
      At best torrents help the internet , at worst they potentialy infringe some copyright. ;) So explain to me again why torrents should be illegal and guns not

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    25. Re:A step in the right direction... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      True in almost everything but freenet and some obscure ass tool promoted by the EFF. Considering that neither of them work reasonably for the illicit activity being talked about here (they are slow as hell) I don't exactly see your point.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    26. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On filesharing networks 99% of porn is distributed illegally. (Stat pulled from the same place as usual.)

    27. Re:A step in the right direction... by Stalyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, getting back to BitTorrent. I would tend to agree that BitTorrent is analagous to gun use in that its primary use is recreational in nature. The difference here, however, is that BitTorrent's recreational use is more likely to be illegal in nature than not.

      I'm sorry but the gun was not invented for recreational use. It was invented as a weapon of war to maim and destroy people. You think the gun was created so people can have gun clubs and target practice? Oh dear god I hope not. The vast majority of the times a gun is used in the world is not for fun. Unless you consider killing and scaring people fun then yes its recreational.

      Anyway the BT and gun analogy is misleading. I don't think anyone is going to die from the misuse of BT. Oh maybe those poor artists will starve to death because you downloaded all their CDs. But other than that.. no one.

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    28. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, bravo, dunno what the grandparent was thinking.. oh wait, this is slashdot, it's ok to just totally pull stuff out of your ass. Move along, nothing to see here...

    29. Re:A step in the right direction... by crunk · · Score: 1
      99% of gun use is against people

      I'm guessing you pulled that stat right out of your ass.

      But yes, guns are used against people. We didn't win the revolutionary war by throwing rocks at the Brits.

      --
      It's the battle of the minds, and everyone's unarmed.
    30. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Idiot! You're not taking into account the fact that one person can be shot more than once! Around 200 people get shot a day... and that one jerk gets 24,999,801 popped into his skull. He's been dead fifteen years, but the hatred still flows. That reminds me, I need to buy more ammunition.

    31. Re:A step in the right direction... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sorry but the gun was not invented for recreational use. It was invented as a weapon of war to maim and destroy people. You think the gun was created so people can have gun clubs and target practice? Oh dear god I hope not. The vast majority of the times a gun is used in the world is not for fun. Unless you consider killing and scaring people fun then yes its recreational.

      I'm sorry but sex was not invented for recreational use. It was invented as a method of procreation to create more people. You think sex was created so people can have sex clubs and kinky orgies? Oh dear god I hope not. The vast majority of the times sex is used in the world is not for fun. Unless you consider making a woman fat for 9 months just to create a new person fun then yes sex is recreational.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    32. Re:A step in the right direction... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Look at it this way, guns can be used to hunt for food. But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      I call bull-fucking-shit on that. For every person who is shot, I would argue there is an animal who is shot. This makes the figure below 50%. In fact, I would say the percentage of use that is against people is far below that. You do realize every cow you eat is shot, right?

    33. Re:A step in the right direction... by carninja · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      99% of gun use is against people? I'm definately heavy supporter of gun control, but when you make up statistics, especially unquantifiable statistics, you just make your argument go to all hell. Stop lying like you know something. Have you ever been to a gun range? People shoot their guns more often at a gun range then they will EVER shoot their guns at any other point in time. Don't believe me? Take a look at the floor of a gun range. It's LITTERED with shells. Take a look at the floor of a crime scene. Just a few shells. Take a look at the forest floor. Probably just as many as at the crime scene. Stop being a jackass and use real statistics, or at least reason to prove your point.

    34. Re:A step in the right direction... by carlvjack · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "The truth is, I personally have fired atleast 1000 bullets from a variety of guns this year. Not a single one of them on humans. The same is true for atleast 20 people that I personally know." But you did not use your gun for what it was intended for or created for, so this is like saying you practiced driving in your parking lot 1000 times yet never took your car on the highway. The gun was not invented for shooting at paper targets it was created to shoot people for the military and for protection of your property.

    35. Re:A step in the right direction... by Spolster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You do realize every cow you eat is shot, right?

      Have you ever been to a slaughterhouse? Unless you like to hunt your own food in the wild the cows you have eaten were (almost) certainly not shot. Generally they are stunned, often with a blow to the back of the neck, then hung up by their hind legs and a main artery is cut and they bleed to death.

    36. Re:A step in the right direction... by slashalive · · Score: 0

      In order for BitTorrent to dominate eMule, is to have an equally large collection of files on it, while maintaining tolerable download speeds. On emule, I'll probably even be able to find a pic of your grandma naked, even though she hasnt have had any naked photo sessions (I hope...). Isnt that something? On BitTorrent, you're lucky if you find a release from six months ago. eMule and BitTorrent just appeals to diffirent kinds of people, that is all. There is no "domination". Comparing eMule and BitTorrent is like comparing appels to oranges.

    37. Re:A step in the right direction... by NSash · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I'm not interested in eMule's "wait two weeks to start your download" technology. Plus, there is no official support for non-Windows platforms.

    38. Re:A step in the right direction... by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      True in almost everything but freenet and some obscure ass tool promoted by the EFF.

      Frost on Freenet wasn't too bad when I used it once, but it's gotten slower (somehow...).

      Tor doesn't allow, nor does it facilitate, P2P traffic through it. You'll not only get banned, but I'm not sure if it's even possible to share files through it (the illegal part).

      I2P is the only one that lets you host anonymous servers (for sharing), and has a BT client for it, but it is slow as well. So yeah, BT is pretty much the only solution as of now.

    39. Re:A step in the right direction... by Skye16 · · Score: 0

      That may be, but I remember reading an article at one point that says the porn industry doesn't have a problem with it at all. It may have been on CNN.com or maybe on Slashdot, I can't remember where.

    40. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same person probably wouldnt also consider carrying a non lethal form of defense .I couldnt live with myself if i killed anyone , Even if it was in self defense .Thankfully , im not allowed a gun and neither is any other private citizen in my land.
      fcat

    41. Re:A step in the right direction... by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 2

      Which you have to ask, why not just use emule/edonkey network?

      Hell, why not use a Gnutella2, as Shareazaa does ?

      Gnutella2 is a smaller network but is still pretty large, and it has the advantage of much shorter queues. Edonkey is cool for very large files which you don't mind waiting for, or for rare files. Gnutella2 is ideal for smaller files which you want to download quickly.

      The more these guys work on decentralising BT, the closer you get to just being a less efficient and less established clone of emule. Whats the point?

      Swarm management in Bittorrent is much more advanced than in edonkey/gnutella clients. The latter do have "swarming" possibilities in that you can download from multiple sources, but seem to have only primitive "retribution" system, etc.

      If someone could set an Edonkey/Gnutella-like system and incorporate Bittorrent's efficient swarm management in it, that would make a killing p2p network. The question is: why do these people insist on developing their own isolated software instead of using established protocols and systems ? Just merge Bittorrent and gnutella/edonkey and be done with it.

      Thomas-

    42. Re:A step in the right direction... by i+wanted+another+nam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, guns are designed to kill. Waving a gun around to scare somebody is not using it for its intended purpose. You are threatening to use it for its intended purpose. Thost bullets don't have "fear me" written on them, they're made of soft lead designed to leave a large exit wound. The gun does not care what it shoots. It is a tool. Point it at what you want to kill, and pull the trigger.

      Bittorrent was designed to download. The analogy to the gun is stupid ad best. You can't threaten a download with azureus. "I MIGHT USE SOMEBODY ELSE'S BANDWIDTH TO DOWNLOAD YOUR FILE! FEAR ME!" ... just doesn't work. The bittorrent client doesn't care what it downloads. It is a tool. Feed it a torrent file, and point it to a directory.

      Then again, I could be completely wrong, because, as I recall, sport utility vehicles were designed for offroad driving, not taking up 4 parking spaces at the fucking Krogers, you fucking asshole. How are those keytip-sized scratches looking?

      --
      The image is a dream, the beauty is real. Can you see the difference?
    43. Re:A step in the right direction... by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Porn is illegal now?

      Not illegal, just copyrighted with all rights reserved. Take the example of Eyes Wide Shut, probably among the best written erotic films in existence. Yes, Warner Bros. Pictures is going to have a problem if somebody puts up a rip on Demonoid.

    44. Re:A step in the right direction... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way, guns can be used to hunt for food. But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      Maybe in some backwater 3rd world nation, but in the United States (which everyone points to as having a HIGH violence rate) this isn't the case by any stretch of the immagination. As a matter of fact WAY less than 1% of gun uses are against people (if IIRC correctly it was actually as low as 0.01%, but I'll have to find a source before I claim that low. I can definately vouce for under 1% though). I swear some of you hippies just must not realize how popular hunting and target shooting are versus the thugs in the streets shooting each other.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    45. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is /. everybody here is a virgin for life anyways

    46. Re:A step in the right direction... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Shooting an animal in the brain supposedly makes the muscles strain and twitch, making the meat much less tender. That's why they're bled to death - the muscles relax as they lose blood and lose strength. Whether or not this is true, I don't know, but that's what I've been told.

    47. Re:A step in the right direction... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      IIRC kosher animals have to have their throat slit by a rabbi.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    48. Re:A step in the right direction... by moofbong · · Score: 1

      99% of gun use is against people.

      Actually, less than 1% of guns are used in crime. More may be used against "people", but I'm going to assume that if a gun is used against a person to prevent a crime (by the police or private citizens), you don't think it's "bad".

      You can argue about their legitmate use and bad rap 'till you're blue in the face, but the legitmate uses are statistically outweighed by bad ones. The same applies to Bittorrent.

      Actually, the courts generally hold that if there is any significant non-infringing use, then the technology is legal. I would agree with you that there are plenty of people who use BitTorrent illegitimately, but that doesn't mean that we should ban it entirely. We live in a free (relatively) society. This is a cost of freedom. If we allow all technologies that can be used for an illegal purpose to be banned, we will soon be living in a totalitarian state without any freedom whatsoever.

      --

      ~moofbong

      If 'con' is the opposite of 'pro', what is the opposite of 'progress'?

    49. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off sex was not invented... unless you believe in intelligent design. Secondly sex seems "fun" because of the chemicals released in our brains. If it didn't seem "fun" or be pleasurable no one would do it and therefore no reproduction.

      Your analogy just doesn't make sense.

    50. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      I didn't figure Michael Moore as the type to post as an AC.

    51. Re:A step in the right direction... by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      It was invented as a weapon of war to maim and destroy people.

      Many of the most valuable inventions known to man were created for purposes of war. This in no way invalidates their usefulness in times of peace.

    52. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, why are you so angry?

      Oh and btw, guns only kill if you shoot them at living things. That's not all they're limited to doing, you do know that right?

    53. Re:A step in the right direction... by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1
      But do you really think that's what most people use it for? I'd say most are looking for porn, movies, software, etc.
      So ... you're saying that porn movies and software are all illegal?
      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    54. Re:A step in the right direction... by bwalling · · Score: 1

      At best torrents help the internet , at worst they potentialy infringe some copyright.

      Why do conversations about BitTorrent always have to include discussing the downloading of copyrighted materials? Every time Slashdot has an article about BitTorrent, we have to hear about Suprnova and other various things from people who apparently don't mind violating copyright law. It's difficult for me to listen to people complain about others assuming BitTorrent has something to do with copyrighted materials - their problem should be with the immature fools who continually cause the association to be made.

    55. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happens when people realize you're defenseless and invade you? ;)

    56. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its just their sole purpose you know ..
      Any other use of a gun is either practice to killing , or a perversion of its use .
      Yes thats right , people who use guns for home defense are Perverts by dictionary definition

    57. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Killing things is usually best left to a (legitimate) government who has the monopoly on legitimate use of force.

      Yes! Only governments should be able to kill people!

      Sheep like you are dangerous to all of humanity.

    58. Re:A step in the right direction... by Deker · · Score: 0

      But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      Not that this belongs here at all, but I can't sit and let such an obviously ignorant (and I mean that in the Merriam-Webster sense not the pejorative I'm sure you assumed) comment go unanswered.

      The majority of firearms are owned by responsible, law-abiding citizens, and are used for a variety of reasons. How about hunting? (contrary to the animal rights radical point of view, animals are NOT people too...don't start the whole "hunting is bad" thing. If I hunt to suppliment my freezer, and eat what I kill, and happen to enjoy the sport of it, I'm no worse than a guy ordering a burger at McD's) How about sport? Shooting as a competative sport likely uses far more rounds of ammunition between practice and competition (1000+ rounds a week in practice, plus several hundred in competition for a lot of competitive shooters). No matter what you may think, it's quite an enjoyable challenge to just shoot at paper targets and put all the rounds through the same hole in the paper. People play DOOM and that's ok...I choose to shoot REAL guns for entertainment. There's also collectors. you know, the folks who appreciate a firearm as a marvel of modern engineering (anybody who has looked at and doesn't see the elegance in the functional and ergonomic design of John M. Browning's Model 1911 .45 must have their eyes closed), or as an important piece of history. Like it or not, your freedom (if you are in the US) was won with guns, and they still keep you safe to this day.

      As far as your 99% goes, I'd like to see ANY verifiable statistic to back that up. I can easily produce research performed by many institutions (including US government bodies) that demonstrate that more firearms in the hands of more responsible law abiding citizens results in fewer violent crimes and fewer gun related deaths. Sometimes a weapon is effective as a deterrant you know...

      Just my $.03...Keep the change.

    59. Re:A step in the right direction... by circusboy · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the gun was developed as a way to make a smaller miniaturized cannon. I don't think the cannon was developed in order to hunt animals.

      weren't large animals just driven into traps? (pits with spikes and the like?)

      most of the early portable gun history I remember had people with armor.

      (See? having a military budget *does* help the civilian lifestyle.;))

      back to the earlier point, about what a gun was designed to do. a gun is designed to kill. period. preferably at a considerable distance. whether or not it is used only to threaten is a matter of semantics, you would still be threatening to kill, unless your target was very sure of your aim and stood very still.

      bit torrent is designed to distribute, period. what it distributes is up to the distributor(s). analogies between them are a little difficult to sustain.

      in response to a separate earlier comment, *I* care whether or not the artist starves to death, I want more art! (and better art!) If I download a piece of music, its generally because it's easier than finding a record player to plug into my computer. (and even then my records are in storage 3 states away.)

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    60. Re:A step in the right direction... by tepples · · Score: 1

      The more these guys work on decentralising BT, the closer you get to just being a less efficient and less established clone of emule. Whats the point?

      The problem with eMule and other ed2k clients is one source with "QR:2443" and 20 other sources with all the same parts that you have.

    61. Re:A step in the right direction... by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Guns are designed to eject a small, dense projectile along a highly predictable trajectory at very high speeds. This makes them very useful for hitting objects at some distance with a force that the object can not sustain without damage. This makes them a very useful tool for killing, but the killing is still an act carried out by the user of the tool.

      So I guess I am argueing that guns are designed to do something that is very useful when trying to kill, not to kill.

      As to whether either rifles or torrents should be illegal, no they shouldn't, they both have plenty of legitimate uses. If you don't think rifles are useful, then you don't understand that in many places(Michigan for one), deer are essentially pests, tree rats, if you will. They destroy trees and have a huge negative impact on forest regeneration. One great way to keep the population in check is to shoot and eat them. There are ~300,000(out of about 1.75 million) deer shot each year in Michigan alone. Compare that to the nation wide murders of less than 20,000(yearly) and you have a pretty concrete example that at least some guns are being used for legitimate purposes(controlling the deer herd). Let's not get into the fact that the herd is where it is due to the elimination of natural predators.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    62. Re:A step in the right direction... by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      Lol x4. Only when you include guns purchased by governments.

      --
      -- $G
    63. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people. You can argue about their legitmate use and bad rap 'till you're blue in the face, but the legitmate uses are statistically outweighed by bad ones.

      Absolute bullshit.

    64. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because its a popular subject at the moment and alot of people have strong feelings one way or the other.
      So this is why it ends up being debated.
      You just contributed to the debate yourself by stating that they are "Immature fools" , well those who download infringing material.This flame will give rise to hundreds of more complaints and arguments.

      If you dont like then ignore it , it will go away if everyone agrees .
      if not then it wont , your just adding flame to the fire.

    65. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shooting is fun

    66. Re:A step in the right direction... by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

      > But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.
      Hold it, pardner - do you have any sources to back this up? I'll take it at face value for the sake of argument, but tossing around this sort of stat shouldn't be taken lightly. If you got a source, post it.

    67. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because a concealed firearm is small, lightweight, and inconspicuous while still being effective in stopping threats at range. Body armor is bulky, heavy, movement-restricting, and does absolutely nothing to neutralize a threat. That last bit in bold is the key element, really.

      Body armor isn't going to be much good when you can't make an assailant stop assailing you. It will merely prolong the inevitable.

    68. Re:A step in the right direction... by daikokatana · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sex was invented? Don't tell Microsoft, they'll try to get a patent!

      --
      http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
    69. Re:A step in the right direction... by bogado · · Score: 1

      I aways wondered who invented sex. I would like to send him a thank you note, it's the best invention ever!!!

      Seriously, sex invented? Sex is as invented as a tree or a rock. Sex is natural consequence of how our bodies are made and it is naturaly prazerous (very some would say), so I guess it could be said that yes it is recreational.

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    70. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh i get it now he's saying that its our nature to kill people just like its in our nature to have sex... just like its in our nature to steal and cheat, murder, post anonymously, pee, sleep, eat, etc...

    71. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beat the living daylights out of them with a rusty nail spiked plank- Either that or the army does something ;)

    72. Re:A step in the right direction... by Danuvius · · Score: 1
      Sadly, I'm not interested in eMule's "wait two weeks to start your download" technology. Plus, there is no official support for non-Windows platforms.


      What's "official" support for you?

      There's mldonkey as another poster pointed out, and I myself have been using aMule for two years now.

      As for the two week wait... perhaps you should try:
      a) actually uploading at some reasonable speed
      b) download more than two files at a time
      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    73. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't kill someone in self-defense (which means kill or be killed), you don't have to worry about living with yourself anyway.

      Sounds like Mummy and Daddy Guvmint sure do know what's bestest for you kiddies. Better hope they don't decide that since they have the only weapons they can start to push you around.

    74. Re:A step in the right direction... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      I used to work as for lack of a better word a forest-ranger , i know about culls . I think they should be legal for that reason alone (perhaps hunting , but thats not in my field).They should be kept locked in a heavily gaurded armory at all other times . People trained in their use should be hired to go on culls , or even better they could pay for the privilidge.

      What i object to is the average person being allowed a gun in their own homes , Fair enough other people disagree , thus is life.
      Just pointing out that so you understand my position on guns.

      Fcat.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    75. Re:A step in the right direction... by SenorChuck · · Score: 1

      Don't feed the troll, and for the love of God and everything holy, don't mod it up as "Insightful" either! The GP poster did not say that the guy was invented as a recreational item as the PP is suggesting.. The PP is arguing on assertions that were not even made by the GP!

      To the PP: Please re-read the GP post and put your troll back under the bridge where it belongs.

      --
      A wise person makes his own decisions, a weak one obeys public opinion. -- Chinese proverb
    76. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The vast majority of the times sex is used in the world is not for fun.

      So, Bob and Jenny have sex most Thursday nights, for their married life, 40 years say (married at 30, die at 70), and they have two kids.

      They therefore have sex ~1500 times in their life (+/- a few, and less in their old age) but only two occasions have resulted in conception.

      I'd say thats recreational use.

    77. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up you cocksucker.

    78. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP poster asserts as it is put into italics by the PP "the primary purpose of guns is recreational" . The PP denies this claim.

    79. Re:A step in the right direction... by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

      If you consider ducks, geese, turkeys, deer, and bullseye targets people, and they may likely be relatives considering your confidence is such crack induced statistics, then you would be correct.

      In this other place the rest of us stay at.... Earth, the majority of shotguns and rifles, which in many countires like Canada make up for the majority of Guns (and the US too I'm sure) are used for hunting, target practice, and gathering dust.

      You may have some ground to stand on if you stated handguns, but I honestly don't know.

    80. Re:A step in the right direction... by Vince+Mo'aluka · · Score: 1
      I read at least one article a day about a person using a gun to PREVENT crime, not to initiate it. The vast majority of these cases go unreported in the mainstream media, while gun crime is reported daily. (Guess whose side the media is on.) Now, where exactly are those statistics you mentioned?

      Rational Review

      Perhaps you're watching too much TV?

      --
      You took his stuff. You pound him.
    81. Re:A step in the right direction... by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      fine then, you can have my bittorrent client when you pry it from my cold, dead hands!

    82. Re:A step in the right direction... by drew · · Score: 1

      at best , guns kill for food at worst guns kill.

      wow, talk about a narrow view.

      i've fired guns several hundreds of times in my life. i have killed a few pigeons and other farm pests, but mostly i've only 'killed' little clay disks, sheets of paper, etc. in other words, about 95% of the times i've used a gun, i never intended to kill anything.

      the times i was intending to kill, i was killing barnyard disease carriers.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    83. Re:A step in the right direction... by bigmammoth · · Score: 1

      can people spot a troll when they see one?

    84. Re:A step in the right direction... by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Informative

      xMule, mldonkey, and aMule.

      All work fine. No they're not "official" eMule, but eMule itself isn't official. It's just client for a P2P network for which eDonkey2000 is the official client (and it DOES have official versions for non-Windows platforms).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    85. Re:A step in the right direction... by hazzey · · Score: 1

      Armies and their like have millions of guns that will never be used for recreational use.

      That skews the numbers a little bit also.

    86. Re:A step in the right direction... by Stalyn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You simply confuse my point but bring to light some interesting ideas. Anyway the primary purpose of sex is to reproduce. This happens to be fun therefore recreational because of some evolutionary process. So yes the primary purpose of sex is recreational. The primary purpose happens to share the characteristic of being recreational.

      However for the gun or whatever weapon, the primary use is to kill. It is used as a weapon of war. The secondary use is for recreation which is just shooting. The act of shooting a gun is recreational but that is its secondary use. The primary use is to kill which maybe fun or not. I would think its not fun to kill or be in war. Then again I haven't so I can't say first hand. However the mental impacts of war tend to point that it is not fun.

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    87. Re:A step in the right direction... by bogado · · Score: 1

      I do believe you are correct, but even if it 0.01% what if the number of guns in the hands of civilians is 1000s of times larger then in other countries?

      I don't have numbers, but I do believe that your number that uses against people are indeed really small, but I also believe that the number of guns in common households are much higher.

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    88. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is weird. Do you not believe that the members of your armed forces are moral individuals?

      If the members of your armed forces are moral, rational individuals, why do you believe that they'd be willing to fire on their fellow citizens?

      Are you willing to fire on your fellow citizens, who have otherwise laid their lives on the line to defend your interests?

      I understand the idea of 'trust but verify', but it seems like there's this peculiar (and possibly artificial) dichotomy of 'them' against 'us', when, in theory, people in the armed forces are your brothers and sisters.

      If you distrust your government, kick them out.

      If you distrust your armed forces, scale them back.

      Instead, you have two 'sides', each wondering who's going to shoot first.

      It's easy to shout 'revolution' and 'war', but maybe not so easy to shout 'reform the electoral process'. Think about it.

    89. Re:A step in the right direction... by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many of the most valuable inventions known to man were created for purposes of war. This in no way invalidates their usefulness in times of peace.

      Of course, this also renders the grandparents claim meaningless:

      Now, getting back to BitTorrent. I would tend to agree that BitTorrent is analagous to gun use in that its primary use is recreational in nature. The difference here, however, is that BitTorrent's recreational use is more likely to be illegal in nature than not.

      Even if BitTorrent was mostly used for illegal purposes (which is impossible to know for certain), this would in no way invalidate the fact that it is used for legal ones (such as distributing Linux distributions) as well.

      BTW. I can't help but notice that every time there's some kind of argument, it will turn into a debate about firearms sooner or later.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    90. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Its just their sole purpose you know .. Any other use of a gun is either practice to killing , or a perversion of its use . Yes thats right , people who use guns for home defense are Perverts by dictionary definition

      You are a delusional psychotic.

      Killing in defense of one's home is perfectly justified.

    91. Re:A step in the right direction... by chihowa · · Score: 1
      "But the humans won't stop there. They'll make bigger boards and bigger nails, and soon, they will make a board with a nail so big, it will destroy them all!"

      -Kudos (or was it Kang?)

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    92. Re:A step in the right direction... by deadtree9 · · Score: 1

      Actually, 99% of gun use is against paper. But that's not to be-little the paper target people, they have feelings too!!

    93. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is weird. Do you not believe that the members of your armed forces are moral individuals?

      Who said anything about armed forces?

      "Law" enforcement agents are far more dangerous.

    94. Re:A step in the right direction... by zorander · · Score: 1

      Do you understand the technical implications of what you suggest? The architecture of Gnutella/eMule/etc. is nothing at all like the architecture of bittorrent. If you have a way to merge them in mind, then by all means share. I'm interested to hear it, but just asserting a demand for something that appears technically unfeasible while passing it off as trivial in context is probably not such a good idea.

    95. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      >Using your statistic, that means that, in my town alone, there would need to be 5000 shootings DAILY.

      Who said anything about DAILY? The grandparent may have pulled a statistic out of his ass, but he didn't *knowingly and falsely attribute statements to someone else*, or LIE.

      Lying ate personal attacks are the norm to the pro-gun lobby. Sadly, there are so many bad apples I have seen that I doubt you are the exception.

      The granparent poster obviously can't prove his "99%" statistic. I doubt anyone read him as presenting it as such. He could simply have said "a majority" (which is far different than 99%) and he would have been right on the money.

    96. Re:A step in the right direction... by yesacs · · Score: 1

      But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people that got me at first, but when you think about all of the guns used in warfare, the amount of gun use against people goes way up. Maybe not to 99% percent though, that's a lot.

    97. Re:A step in the right direction... by revery · · Score: 1

      So, sex arose as part of the natural order of evolution, but guns didn't? How are you separating natural process from unnatural and by what higher power did the two become separate in the first place. If there is no higher power than the physical laws of the universe, then guns are just as "natural" and uninvented as sex. Granted, sex may be more intrinsic, but guns were brought about by the same process.

    98. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Guns Are designed to kill,

      Odd. I thought they were designed to propel a lump of metal at a high rate of speed along a trajectory determined by the operator.

      guns are by nature evil.

      Made by the devil himself, right?

      Guns are objects. They are not inherently 'Good' or 'Evil'. Good and evil are used to describe human morals and ethics.

      Calling guns 'evil' is like calling copyright infringement 'piracy.'

    99. Re:A step in the right direction... by qkslvrwolf · · Score: 1

      Besides, if the US military decided it wanted to take over, American citizens wouldn't fare any better than the Iraqis did. If you somehow think homegrown militia are still capable of standing up to the military, you have some serious reality issues.

      I understand that people want to be able to hunt. Gun control needs to be a state or even county question.

      But claiming you're going to keep the goverment in line because you have a tricked out SKS? Get a grip, dude.

      This post is actually pointed at the GP, I think.

      --
      Or have you only comfort...that stealthy thing that enters the house and guest then becomes host, then master - KG
    100. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just FEARing that he'll get shot and killed after PERVERTING somebody's SUV with a key.

    101. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Killing to protect your TV set , and you call me psychotic.

    102. Re:A step in the right direction... by mubar · · Score: 1

      Well, you are basically right in that. Let's be realistic: porn producers everywhere get loads of revenues, and p2p doesn't put those in danger. When some big movie studio or music company puts a new product on the market, they see it as a some sort of masterpiece that must be protected at all means possible. This includes suing fileswappers, if the company is big and influential enough to attack them.

      Porn industry sees their own products differently. Even though they are copyrighted and technically illegal to share, it's not like anyone's gonna get sued for p2p-porn. These products are treated as bulk whose only purpose is to make money. If something doesn't sell enough, it's time to move on. Big factor here is that publishing such film always pays itself back, since costs are rather small and customer interest always high. No amount of "illegal" filesharing is gonna change that.

    103. Re:A step in the right direction... by MaCa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Before you say 'wah wah bit torrent is faster', etc, it is only like that because it is centralised and so a tracker can make sure everyone is seeding, there are statistics which encourage people to seed, and most importantly, there are far less files, and so the bandwidth isnt spread out as thinly.


      For God's sake, please!!! Basically, all the tracker does is distributing a list random list of clients to you and keeping statistics.
      BitTorrent is fast because your client makes sure it is getting the most it can from the network using it's tit-for-tat logic: if a peers uploads in a nice speed to you, so you will do to him. If a peer is not uploading fast enough you will just stop uploading to him or upload to him slower. It's this selfish behavior that makes BT work - not the tracker!

      The more these guys work on decentralising BT, the closer you get to just being a less efficient and less established clone of emule. Whats the point?


      eMule is also decentralizing itself (with kad), so, what's your point? By decentralizing all they want is avoiding the only point of failure that BT has: its dependency on a tracker. But, then again, it is not the tracker that makes BT faster then eMule...

      ON the other had, a emule server is nothing close to a BT tracker. Basically, the first only is concerned about collection meta-data and handling searches, the later just handle source searches and keeps tracks of who has each piece of the file. :-)

      As far as 'warezing' is concerned (99% of traffic), BT is a terrible protocol. The trouble is, these kids see the speed of BT and think thats the way to go. They realise the centralisation is a problem, and so try to fix that. Without realising they are just reinventing the wheel. They think they are going to get the best of both worlds, because they are just warezing kids and don't know any better.


      Yeah, right. It just doesn't matter that BT is the result of a PhD thesis and there are lots of papers in ACM and IEEE stating that "Yes, BT supports flash crowds and is able to keep with a almost insane number of users downloading". Those are all warezing folks, for sure! :-P
    104. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you people whine like girls about 'police state' this and 'infringing civil rights' that, but then you go and say shit like the PP. A-fucking-mazing.

      Yeah, no shit, if they convince the military, you're fucked. But what about Law Enforcement? Lots of people screaming about Ashcroft and now Gonzalez. I guess it's easier to ignore the civilian side of it, since it doesn't help you make a point.

    105. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats right! Call out the Forest Ranger Army Battalions twice a year for a massive, 300K Deer Culling!

      Everyone to the armory! Its time to cull the deer!

      You know, I'm all about torrents. I don't really care about guns. But:
      1) Getting rid of a tool because its being misused is stupid.
      2) Punishing the many because of the few is stupid.
      3) Stifling the advance of technology because it has some small chance of being 'misused' is stupid.
      4) Allowing it to be legal for a middleman buisness freak to be in charge of what art gets popular and what doesn't is also stupid. If you really want more and better art, then you really ought to be using tools like idea.tv, and those downloading sites that use collaborative filters to bring you good content.

    106. Re:A step in the right direction... by babyrat · · Score: 1

      99% of gun use is against people? Right...if that were the case there'd be no people left.

      Go down to your local shooting club and see...or perhaps to your local hunting ground (the kind of hunting ground where you are not allowed to hunt people).

      And here's me being all for gun control...of course one accidental death caused by a poorly controlled gun is certainly much worse than one accidental copyright infringement caused by poor downloading habits.

    107. Re:A step in the right direction... by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sorry but the gun was not invented for recreational use. It was invented as a weapon of war to maim and destroy people.

      It really makes no sense to talk about "the gun". Although the first guns were weapons of war, they have fairly little in common with modern firearms. During the long (and continuing) evolution of guns, many different uses impacted their development, and some of them had nothing to do with war. For example, one very significant advance -- the long, rifled barrel -- was quickly adopted by armies after its military capabilities were demonstrated during the US Revolutionary War, but that advance was developed to produce a better tool for gathering food. There are many other such examples.

      Guns today are designed and built for many different purposes, and their designs reflect it. Some are primarily designed for killing or wounding people. Military arms and many handguns fit this category, with many subcategories for particular environments and goals. Some are designed solely for supported target shooting, using very small bullets and enormously long, thick, heavy barrels. Some are designed for hunting, with widely differing designs based on the characteristics of the animal to be hunted and the environment in which it is hunted.

      And, yes, the analogy between guns and BT is very misleading, except insofar as they're both tools that can be applied to many different purposes. But that is such a large category that it would be wise to pick a different, less inflammatory tool than the gun for the comparison. Like a hammer. Or a car. Or a TCPA Trusted Platform Module ;-)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    108. Re:A step in the right direction... by mark-t · · Score: 1
      To some extent, you are correct. Sex was not invented for recreational use. Its recreational aspect exists as a side effect to ensure that the survival of the species continues.

      After all, if it wasn't fun, I highly doubt anyone would participate in it at all. Mechanically speaking, it's actually kind of disgusting and messy. It just happens to be more than adequately pleasurable enough to make up for this that most people probably don't even give it a thought.

    109. Re:A step in the right direction... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      I enjoy target ranges , I am a rather fine shot . I have also aided in culls(deer or foxes , riffles only ). .. alot of people are totaly taking what i said out of context , I was in essence irationalisng guns in the same way that those who oppose bittorent irationalise it. subtle points often get lost here in the heat .

      Fair enough i am totaly against guns for self defense , but not for culls or sport.I just dont think most people should be allowed them at home , difrent story if your a farmer , i assume you have yours locked safely away and its primary purpose is putting animals out of their missery(if your still a farmer that is).

      I have nothing against that , nor do i have anything against clay pigeon shoots.

      Just letting you know i was meerly making a point as opposed to preaching my belifes.

      I seem to be getting paraphrased to hell here , I mean when did i say guns were evil (I agree the use of guns to kill is wrong and thats the persons evil not the gun)I only said that the argument exists...

      Ah well flames do arise though. ;) I also forget the tone of my voice dosn't come over to well online ..

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    110. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is a major reason why BitTorrent hasn't completely dominated eMule yet"
      are you kidding? BT is no less then 60% of ALL trafiic, emule is like a peble on the beach....

    111. Re:A step in the right direction... by elgaard · · Score: 1

      >Bittorrent has plenty of legit uses. But do you really think that's
      >what most people use it for? I'd say most are looking for porn, movies,
      >software, etc.

      I think you greatly underestimate the legal uses of Bittorrent.
      Just the Knoppix torrent:
      http://torrent.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/

      Accounts for more than 80 TeraBytes.

    112. Re:A step in the right direction... by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

      Because if you just wound them they'll sue you for millions and win.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
    113. Re:A step in the right direction... by qkslvrwolf · · Score: 1

      So, your solution to disliking what the government is doing is to shoot the cop that comes to take you away?

      Because, yeah, thats really going to lead to a different outcome then the military showing up in the first place.

      So, lets follow a short train of events here.

      1) You do something against the law. Lets say you download some porn over bit tracker and because the RIAA/MPAA has gotten too powerful while you were worrying about the FBI, the FBI shows up to confiscate your computer.
      2) You shoot the FBI agent who shows up to collect your computer, and call all your militia buddies to tell them the revolution is on.
      3) The FBI brings in a SWAT team or too, law enforcement with military small arms capability.
      4) You and your friends die, those that survive get life in prison.

      Whoops, that didn't work. But what if you had more guys with guns!

      1) Follow all steps above, but this time the FBI calls in the Guard. You still die, and get made fun of by the rest of the country.

      Guns aren't going to change the government in this country. Probably ever. Certainly not in our lifetime. If you're worried about government then you need to get the MSM to stop being republican pimps and you need to vote some fresh blood in. Wes Clark. Howard Dean. That guy from Montana. Ross Perot for christs sake. Cause you sure aren't going to save yourself from the government with a gun, be it military or law enforcement.

      --
      Or have you only comfort...that stealthy thing that enters the house and guest then becomes host, then master - KG
    114. Re:A step in the right direction... by gowen · · Score: 1

      I'm more surprised that he considered Eyes Wide Shut to be well written. Sure, it's well written by porn standards... but who watches Anal Adventures #17 for the dialogue?

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    115. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also should be noted that 87.4% of statistics are made up.

    116. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I hear the Dems rolled over a little compound that tried that. And again with a little cabin in the woods. FBI got the serious bitchslap for that.

      You're the only one I see here talking about actually shooting anyone though. Why is that, do you think? Got some issues you'd like to tell us about?

      Yeah, let's get some fresh blood in, cos what we should really be doing is rolling over and becoming absolutely subservient to the government. Your fresh blood will assure that.

    117. Re:A step in the right direction... by XMyth · · Score: 1

      So, when you're done with that statistic, do you actually shove it back up your ass each time?

      That'd get tiresome I'd think.

      If that's your thing though, more power to you.

    118. Re:A step in the right direction... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I'm not interested in eMule's "wait two weeks to start your download" technology.

      My oldest 0-byte-downloaded download is 273 days old :(... This in a machine that's online 24/7.

      Plus, there is no official support for non-Windows platforms.

      No, just the non-adware-added mldonkey ;).

      Unfortunately, mldonkey is written in some weird language called "Objective Camel" or something like that, which makes it hard to compile (the compile scripts have to download the compiler) and impossible to change (since I don't know the language - I'd really like to get filters like gtk-gnutella, and maybe even true scripting (that's a hint for any P2P developers out there - if you have a searchable network, include the python runtime library to allow users to write scripts to automate searching and downloading)).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    119. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's review the math. Where do you get that 99% of 50 equals 5000? You aren't that retarded are you? I'm assuming that if you were, you would not be able to figure out how to turn a computer on let alone use it well enough to navigate to Slashdot.

      Even if you are counting by rounds expended (which I highly doubt is anything but wild speculation on your part if you are), your 5,000 statistic requires that each of those 50 people use an average of 10,000 rounds each ... every day. Are you insane? Do you even know how much ammunition costs? Even buckets-o-.22 shot from Walmart would cost around $250. Do you spend $250 a day in ammo?

    120. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /virgin

    121. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, "kosher" animals are bled to death. The animals flop around on the floor for minutes as they die. Proper American butchering kills them instantaneously with a "bullet" to the head (actually a bolt-gun). Who told you that "kosher" meat was killed humanely? Was it the same jew who tried to tell you to dismember your little baby boy??

    122. Re:A step in the right direction... by zenderbender · · Score: 1
      I really hate it when idiots pull numbers out of there ass. (99%???) There are enough legitimate statistics being warped, without people just picking numbers at random.

      My own statistics: I know 284 people who hunt. None of them has ever shot a person. Therefore 100% of the people I know don't use guns to shoot people. Therefore 100% of people only download legitimate files!

    123. Re:A step in the right direction... by Carnil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe so, but sex using a preservative was indeed "invented" for recreational use, as it has few other uses.

    124. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at it this way, guns can be used to hunt for food. But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      I don't see the conflict there if you're into eating people-meat. :)

    125. Re:A step in the right direction... by staeiou · · Score: 1

      So to sum it up ,
      at best , guns kill for food at worst guns kill.


      First off, let me say that I agree with your analogy. Second, let me say, No, no no, no, no! You've got the whole point of gun ownership wrong.

      The whole point of the protection of guns isn't so that you can eat. This isn't the reason why they are protected under the U.S. constitution. Guns aren't protected for recreational use either. MDMA (Extacy) is classified by the government as a "recreational" drug, but it is not protected. This is a thing that most people do not understand.

      You don't have the right to own a gun because you have the right to have food or the right to have fun. You have the right to own a gun to protect the civil liberties of you and your family. The reason for guns and weapons in the hands of the people is twofold: to allow people to protect themselves whenever the government cannot (either to protect from small crimes, or to form militias in the case of invasion), and for people to protect themselves _from_ the government.

      Our founding fathers recognized that most authorities slowly increase their power and hegemony at the expense of the liberty of the people. This is why Franklin (I think) said (paraphrased) that a little revolution, every once in a while, isn't too bad. Besides, the Founding Fathers knew what would happen if the people lost their ability to protect themselves. An unarmed populace is the most vulnerable to unwanted change.

      Look at every major and minor genocide in the past 100 years. From Nazi-Germany to Khymer Rouge to Rwanda, the government in control made it illegal for people to own weapons. Once they had no weapons, the massacres began.

      The reason you are allowed to own guns is not for food, or for fun, or for sport. It is to remind the government that they are at the will of the people.

    126. Re:A step in the right direction... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      This is the flamebait since it's complete bullshit. Guns are primarily used for target practice and hunting, vastly outstripping all instances where guns are used against people - even in the United States.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    127. Re:A step in the right direction... by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

      It's nice to see that the Gentoo borg use Bittorrent as a way to distribute their ISOs, as does Knoppix and the rest of the Free Linux distros. Heck, you can even find a legit copy of SuSE 9.2 out there.

      This is my preferred way to get large distros - I know that I'm going to get full bandwidth for the download nearly immediately.

    128. Re:A step in the right direction... by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is used as a weapon of war.

      It's also used (quite effectively, even according to the FBI) as a means of defense against violent human predators.

      I have no problem if you don't want to carry or use a gun. Go ahead, be prey - your safety isn't my problem. It isn't even the problem of the cops, according to recent court rulings. But you don't have any business trying to turn me into prey just because you can't stand the notion that I may not be as spineless as you are.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    129. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, now, that was unsurprisingly incoherent.

    130. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spineless i walk around without a gun... you need a gun cause you're scared.... pussy!!!!

    131. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, eleventy million people know that Homer's actual line is "Forfty percent of all people know that."

    132. Re:A step in the right direction... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Take the example of Eyes Wide Shut, probably among the best written erotic films in existence.

      This is logically equivalent to calling "Debbie Does Dallas" one of the greatest dramas of all time.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    133. Re:A step in the right direction... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      So there is still a fairly just debate over the fact that guns are by nature evil .

      Inanimate objects are incapable of being evil.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    134. Re:A step in the right direction... by karnal · · Score: 1

      " Maybe so, but sex using a preservative was indeed "invented" for recreational use, as it has few other uses."

      Using a preservative? Is that like covering your body in Smuckers?

      I'm having a hard time picturing that.

      --
      Karnal
    135. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, my bad. I was under the impression that individuals who stock weaponry in order to form a militia did so against a possible military coup, or military-enforced regime.

      Even so, I can't see how the use of weaponry is better than political reform, when it comes to abuse of legal authority. Bad cops aren't taken down by vigilante citizens, they're taken down by the system.

      People don't like bad cops, but copkillers are seen as being even worse.

      Unless you meant some other branch of your law enforcement system, in which case, I apologize for missing the point yet again.

    136. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Killing to protect your TV set , and you call me psychotic.

      You are a psychotic. And a pretty stupid psychotic at that.

      Most people understand that an intruder invading one's home in the middle of the night poses a special kind of danger; since the intruder doesn't care if the residents are home, the intruder presumably doesn't care if he has to injure or kill one of the residents to get what he's after.

      You can throw up strawmen about TV sets all you want, but the fact remains that no place that is not under the jurisdiction of mentally ill psychopaths will charge someone with homocide for killing such an intruder.

    137. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this in North America or the Middle East?

    138. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, since your local rod & gun shop is naturally the focus point of all events in the universe, it follows that a simple observation such as the one you describe will easily determine the percentage of the population that get their kicks by going and shooting up the locals.

      Nevermind that in sub-saharan Africa there are several wars underway, not to mention what is currently taking place in Iraq & Afghanistan. These places are, of course, subservient to the mystical realm of your local Shoot & Swish. All the inner-city ganglords and Russian mafiosos do their shopping there, as do the pirates of the Phillipine sea and the armies of all dictatorships in the world.

      Indeed, the extensive network of internationally-recognized diplomatic relationships that are formed from the good old local Bang & Pole deserve a mention in every official foreign policy brief.

    139. Re:A step in the right direction... by cybercuzco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesnt matter what its primary purpose is. The primary purpose of a sword is to kill, does that mean that I shouldnt be allowed to have a sword over my mantle? The primary purpose of botulinum toxin is to kill, does that mean botox should be pulled from the market? If people enjoy something, even if its primary purpose is something else, they should be allowed to do it, as long as they arent hurting anyone.

      --

    140. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The vast majority of the times sex is used in the world is not for fun" ? This is as absurd a comment as suggesting that intercourse only leads to pregnancy. In the modern world, we know about and use methods and devices to control our own reproduction; that's one of the major advanced in our society, and what separates us from the third world and the catholics and other throwbacks.

    141. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      People don't like bad cops, but copkillers are seen as being even worse.

      I doubt very many people would be shedding tears if some small group started eliminating FBI, ATF and IRS agents.

    142. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ehh....have you been paying any attention to what's going on in Iraq these days?

      Nobody thinks that a militia can stand up to a real army in conventional battle. Guerrilla warfare is another matter entirely.

    143. Re:A step in the right direction... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.

      Just trying to imagine how the US military would decide to do something like this.

      Are you thinking the president doesn't want to step down so he orders the military to keep him in power... ...and they all obey?

      Or is there some other person or group you think could actually command even a single branch of the military to take over the country?

      I guess my imagination is simply lacking in this arena.

    144. Re:A step in the right direction... by FLEB · · Score: 1

      I think it's more like dynamite. BitTorrent was designed from the beginning for legitimate uses, like load-relief in software distribution, but it got co-opted by the pirates and now it's seen as just another piracy tool.

      In the beginning, BT was seen by many as a legitimizer of P2P. Since it required a central website/server with a (theoretically) more tracable owner, it made the system less anonymous and more useful to legitimate distributors than illegitimate.

      Unfortunately, anonymously registered sites and sites hiding behind safe-harbor provisions mean that BT is still anonymous enough to become a piracy vehicle, and it has gained a bad reputation for that.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    145. Re:A step in the right direction... by khrtt · · Score: 1

      But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people.

      C'mon, 99% of gun use is for target practice.

    146. Re:A step in the right direction... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      No, at best, guns kill for self defense of individuals and entire nations. That's more useful than some arbitrary internet protocol.

    147. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each year, every one in the US would have been shot... twelve times.

      That or some poor schmuck is is taking a whole lot of shots for the rest of us :)

    148. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, okay. So under what conditions would you feel justified pulling a weapon on a member of law enforcement?

      I dunno. I'm having a hard time imagining any course of action that begins with 'I pull out a handgun' and doesn't end with 'I end up in the morgue'.

      I don't really understand how 'tight gun control' means 'subservience to the government'. It's possible that I may not be seeing the long-term implications, but it seems to me that if law enforcement is abusing authority, you should change the law enforcement, instead of planning to engage in guerilla warfare.

    149. Re:A step in the right direction... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Killing things is usually best left to a (legitimate) government who has the monopoly on legitimate use of force

      I'd be reallly careful about that one. What's to say that a Government is legitimate? What's to keep a government that has a monopoly on usage of force from doing various nasty things, like what happened in Germany, Russia, China, Iraw, Afganistan, Africa(various countries), etc?

      I prefer the government to have some enforcement capabilities, but for the majority of the power, including that of lethal force, to remain with the public at large. Tends to keep the amount of genocide down when the people can fight back.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    150. Re:A step in the right direction... by greenstrat · · Score: 1

      Although the first guns were weapons of war, they have fairly little in common with modern firearms. During the long (and continuing) evolution of guns, many different uses impacted their development

      Exactly! All products evolve, just like guns have.

      The original computers weren't used for playing games either, they were invented for doing scientific calculations.

    151. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guerrilla warfare is one of those things that emerges from a set of specific circumstances, i.e. a small force that knows the terrain intimately, has nothing to lose, fighting against a large, ill-equipped or unprepared force that's either invading or occupying a territory.

      It's not clear that a small team of guerrillas can fight on even terms with a conventional army that follows the same conditions. After all, from the army's perspective, there are terrorists on their home turf, directly threatening their familes and friends.

      They're the very same people, just on different sides of the field. They're just as desperate, just as well-trained, and there are more of them.

    152. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, is preservative in this context slang for contraceptive? Or, are people actually out there doing kinky things with BHT and BHA?

      Or, was the word that you were looking for "prophylactic"?

    153. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I hunt to suppliment my freezer, and eat what I kill, and happen to enjoy the sport of it, I'm no worse than a guy ordering a burger at McD's

      Well, if you're off hunting elephants and whales, then I believe you might be rather wrong as far as the consensus view is concerned.

    154. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (irm)

      I used to work in market research, and one of the (many) little triva nuggets I left with was that we found more than half of all statistics used in conversation are made up on the spot.

      (I'd provide the exact percentage, but can't remember, nor can I bear the irony of doing so.)

    155. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you don't have any business trying to turn me into prey just because you can't stand the notion that I may not be as spineless as you are.

      Right, so when redneck Billy Joe leaves his whole arsenal of personal firearms under the bed in his trailer, and one of his kids takes one to school and kills your kid, are you still going to stand up for Billy Joe's rights to have guns? And by your definition, doesn't your kid become prey at that point? Because you've advocated that everyone needs guns?

      I'd have to say the number of citizens who've SUCCESSFULLY fended off a burgler/rapist/murderer with a gun is MUCH lower than the number of people that use guns to go shoot up schools/stores/people, etc.

    156. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Bob and Jenny are married, so parent is right, it wouldn't be "fun"

    157. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. That analogy fails , if they want to force a military state ,having a few guns just means more civilians will die . Dont kid yourself that owning a gun is any protection from it , making sure those people never get in atall is the only protection (IE: voting).

      Nazi germany is a false analogy , totaly . Do you think the average german citizen was treated like crap , far from it .They were in a period of regrowth and had jobs , money and luxarys for the first time in many many years . so when Hittler said March they obeyed , he was a hero to them .. ofcourse they did not know the real story , what was going on in the background , that is how it starts .

      If America is going to turn into a facist state , then carry on the way your going currently.If Bush holds a reforendum on removing term limits , then you better start to worry .Citizens may get put in camps ... like camp david for example , bruttaly beaten by soldiers and held without trial or any treatment resembling whats stipulated by the geniva convention.

      A reveloution comes from the changing of ideas of the whole society , all bloody reveloutions end up with hugh problems , It took america Years to recover and a civil war. Where as look at Canada , who gained independance with peasfull means .

      Another bloody reveloution , Russia this time . Instead of bringing about a communist utopia led to a Facist dictatorship and 100 years of problems , not limited to but including , Stalin(the man was more of a monster than hittler, he just had better PR),the cold war , and the nuclear arms race which has us all in a rather uncomfertable position (both the USs and Russias fault).

      Cuba is an example of a bloody reveloution that went alot better but they were revolting against a facist (american gouvernmental pupet) even then countless thousands lost their lives needlessly, and Americas Communist fear has kept them partialy impovrished with Unjust military actions and Illegal trade sanctions.

      So ask yourself this , do you really want a bloody reveloution.

    158. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong analogy , i prefer this one .Guns Are designed to kill, which can be used to kill prey for food or murder.
      So there is still a fairly just debate over the fact that guns are by nature evil .


      A firearm is designed to shoot a projectile in a controled direction at a controlable velocity. The target of this projectile is entirely up to the choice of the individual aiming said firearm. The firearm is an inanimate object which will remain such until acted upon by some outside force which may or may not have "evil" intent. By nature it is a tool, neither good nor evil.
      Your claim that it is inherently evil could very well be applied to any object that can be used to harm be it Uranium ore, a motor vehicle, or a simple sharp writing device. All have the capability to be used for "evil" purposes but it is left to the operator of said object to decide on the mission.

    159. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your complete and unwavering selfishness speaks volumes. And you don't even see it.

      I've already addressed your question. If you choose not to understand, that's your problem.

      Here's a hint: research the Randy Weaver case. All of it, not just the incident itself, keep going.

    160. Re:A step in the right direction... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and the intention of that was to, erm, look pretty or something. The intent of having that lump of metal move at high velocity is to kill people. Claiming they're not designed to kill people is like claiming http isn't designed to transfer web pages, it's designed to copy bits from one computer to another.

      --
      I am trolling
    161. Re:A step in the right direction... by m50d · · Score: 1
      1. Have you ever tried to implement gnutella2? The reference implementation link on the site doesn't work, and there are precious few implementations around, and even fewer non-windows ones, none of them well documented. So you basically have to do it from scratch. The protocol is nicely documented, yes, but it's still a lot harder than with bittorrent.

      2. The whole point your parent post was making is that advanced swarming like bittorrent does relies on centralisation. You can only have a proper retribution system if you have a centralised tracker to track it. The only way to decentralise bittorrent is to remove that swarming payback ability - and if you do that, it becomes just another gnutella clone.

      3. It's odd that you complain about people making new protocols when you've just been recommending gnutella2, which is Mike going off on his own because he's fed up with real gnutella rather than working on it to make it better.

      4. Merging protocols is really hard. It's easier to write a network from scratch, really. There are decentralised networks that try to have payback working, most of the f2f systems depend on it, and also have the advantage of anonymity. But they're not popular yet.

      --
      I am trolling
    162. Re:A step in the right direction... by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, so when redneck Billy Joe leaves his whole arsenal of personal firearms under the bed in his trailer, and one of his kids takes one to school and kills your kid, are you still going to stand up for Billy Joe's rights to have guns?

      My kid has a far better chance of drowning or dying in a fall than getting shot. You won't, however, see me campaigning to outlaw swimming pools or ladders.

      Unlike you I see an actual value in gun ownership: self defense.

      I'd have to say the number of citizens who've SUCCESSFULLY fended off a burgler/rapist/murderer with a gun is MUCH lower than the number of people that use guns to go shoot up schools/stores/people, etc.

      According to the FBI somewhere between 200,000 and 800,000 violent crimes are prevented every year because the intended victim was carrying a gun. The gun is actually discharged in less than 1/10 of 1% of these cases, and most of the time the discharge doesn't result in an actual injury. So you're dead wrong in your assumption.

      The FBI no longer publishes the study in question, but there are plenty of others that support these statistics. One of the most scientific and widely-reknown is "Firearms and Violence: A Critical View" by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences; you used to be able to get a pdf version of their report online and I have a copy of it myself. Unless you're going to go completely whacko and contend that these folks have a huge pro-gun bias I suggest that you use this study (along with all the others cited in the paper) to educate yourself on the actual defensive use of guns in the U.S. and its efficacy in preventing violent crimes.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    163. Re:A step in the right direction... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Fair enough i am totaly against guns for self defense , but not for culls or sport

      Ah, so I can just come by with my(homemade if necessary) firearm and you won't have any effective defense?

      Tell me, do you think that it's more noble for a woman to be strangled with her own pantyhose than to defend herself with a firearm?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    164. Re:A step in the right direction... by OblvnDrgn · · Score: 1

      Just to bring things full circle, let's make an analogy comparing guns to, say, BitTorrent.

      I'd have to say the number of citizens who have downloaded legal software is MUCH lower than the number of people that use BitTorrent to commit copyright infringement.

      Does that mean we should outlaw BitTorrent?

      (Not necessarily pro-gun, just amused by the off topic irony)

    165. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many languages a word similar to "preservative" (e.g. "preservatif" in French) means "condom" . I suspect the parent may not be a native speaker of English (although his English is very good otherwise).

    166. Re:A step in the right direction... by Teja · · Score: 1

      I believe it is 97.9% of statistics that are made up on the spot.

      --
      - Teja
    167. Re:A step in the right direction... by JAppi · · Score: 1

      I personally think it's a step in the wrong direction. In some cases, having a centralized tracker can help to control who can and cannot download. For example in the Fansub scene most groups remove torrents as soon as an american company pickes up the title for distribution. The idea is fansubs promote the product people couldn't get otherwise. Now that the product is out everyone is free to buy it. If the tracker is decentralized, the orginal uploader is incapable of stopping people from downloading.

    168. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guns are designed to fire a projectile, not necessarily kill, you idiot. I can use (and have used) a gun without killing anything. Sigh, you typical slashdot fucktard.

    169. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO. YOu're a fucking moron. Guns are designed for shooting! You can shoot something without killing it. Ever hear of BB guns? Paintball guns? Stop just being another example of how ignorant and stupid slashdotters are.

    170. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How are those keytip-sized scratches looking?

      I hope you scratch the car of a lunatic with a concealed weapon. I really do. Personally, you scratch my car, you're getting your ass kicked, you pasty little slashdot teenage weenie.

    171. Re:A step in the right direction... by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      No, it's more like rolling around in a pile of MSG. Mmmm... MSG.

      Although smuckers might be fun, I'll have to try it sometime...

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    172. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesnt matter what its primary purpose is. The primary purpose of a sword is to kill, does that mean that I shouldnt be allowed to have a sword over my mantle? The primary purpose of botulinum toxin is to kill, does that mean botox should be pulled from the market? If people enjoy something, even if its primary purpose is something else, they should be allowed to do it, as long as they arent hurting anyone.

      It doesnt matter what its primary purpose is. The primary purpose of a penis is to fuck, does that mean that I shouldnt be allowed to have a penis over my nose? The primary purpose of maximus spermatozoa is to fill-er-up, does that mean orgasms should be added from the purging? If people enjoy something, even if its primary purpose is something else, they should be allowed to do it, as long as they arent hurting anyone.

    173. Re:A step in the right direction... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Wow that argument is so far off it hurts.
      Pull the firearm and the robber shoots you before you've had a chance to lock and load. Seriously professional criminals if they belive the target is going to be armed will be equaly well armed and ready , you go for a conceled weapon .. Bang your dead. Prevention as opposed to cure .

      You come into my house with the intention of shootine me ,then i will either disarm you and beat the crap out of you or you will shoot me -Simple as that .If you broke into my house with the intention of shooting me ,If i have a gun i pull it on your and you pull yours on me.
      What hapens then .. eh. Either you shoot me or i shoot you , Either way someone could die , and honestly i couldnt live with that if i took a human life.

      I used to work as a bouncer and im fairly well trained in self-defense so perhaps im not a perfect example . though..

      Ever hear of prevention being better than cure .
      Well if you cant toaly prevent it then why do you want a fatal resolve .Why not a non-leathel form of defense.
      such as a bola gun or net gun. or how about a some form of spray or a high powerd tazer.
      a weapon that will knock the attacker down , but not kill (prefebly unconcious but definantly subdued)

      Giving you enough time to disarm them and take the weapon and or phone the police and get the F*ck out of the area to wait for trained profesionals to deal with it.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    174. Re:A step in the right direction... by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Why would you make that sort of assertion?

      Because I exhibit the ability to objectify myself from the pleasure of the act and analyze it purely from a physical and mechanical point of view, independant of any pleasure that people may experience?

      The fact that you may not able to do that is actually illustrative of the very point that I was making.

    175. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, maybe guns weren't INVENTED for recreation, but neither were a lot of things that today ARE USED for recreation. That doesn't mean they aren't VALID for recreation. Hunting was not originally a recreation, it was done for food, but now many do it as a recreation. Running was probably first done as a necessity to escape danger, but is done as a recreation now. Should we ban running?

    176. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the way to go for bottorrent is to add multicast
      in someway or an other

      i believe there was a project that did that
      i tried it some time ago dont remeber it's name
      i prolly read about it here

      anyway 1 person multicasts something to a few other people the file is divided in chunks when others join the people who have those chunks multicast those for about a half an hour then the multicast goes dormant a cheksum sees if those parts are ok if not a process like bittorent starts to correct the mistakes.
      half an hour of correcting mistakes
      process starts again.

      thats how i would do it, dunno if that was actualy what they were doing, been to long to remeber.
      do remeber that it had a nasty UI and that it didnt work for me.

      if you happen to know what i'm talking about
      i would like to see how it evolved, it's a realy intresting consept so urls are welcome :)

    177. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more these guys work on decentralising BT, the closer you get to just being a less efficient and less established clone of emule.

      I don't see the parallel. on eMule you can pretty much leech as much as you want without ever uploading a single file. Try that with BT, decentralized tracker or not.

      BT is VERY VERY DIFFERENT than eMule and it pisses me off when people compare them like that. A derivative of BT may or may not suck, but it will never be a "clone" of eMule (which is much better than BT if you are looking for old or rare files, by the way).

    178. Re:A step in the right direction... by Ykant · · Score: 1

      I would suspect, that the one killing implement designed with the sole purpose of killing another human is the sword. It's not suited to skinning animals or perparing a meal, it wouldn't make a good utility tool like a hand knife or dagger would.

      It's not useful for cutting down brush as much as a machete would be.

      Only farmers and the Grim Reaper would carry a scythe and not be considered foolish.

      You certainly wouldn't use it to hunt boars, bears, buffalo, or other large game as you would *really* want to use a spear or some other distance weapon.

      If anyone else can give me another _practical_ use for the design of a sword besides killing people, I'd love to hear it.

      --
      Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
    179. Re:A step in the right direction... by tepples · · Score: 1

      [Calling "Eyes Wide Shut" erotic] is logically equivalent to calling "Debbie Does Dallas" one of the greatest dramas of all time.

      Erotica != porn.

    180. Re:A step in the right direction... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of the times sex is used in the world is not for fun. Unless you consider making a woman fat for 9 months just to create a new person fun then yes sex is recreational.

      Except the vast majority of sexual encounters don't result in pregnancy, even without contraception - a woman is only fertile a few days out of the month.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    181. Re:A step in the right direction... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      This is a major reason why BitTorrent hasn't completely dominated eMule yet.

      This is one of thsoe cases where the less popular one is better (like Ogg to MP3). You can get a ton of seeders on BT, but you'll usually find yourself queued in the thousands and ten-thousands on eMule. There are a lot more legit uses for BT than eMule. In fact, BT is usually much faster than eMule in all my experiences. Wanted the new episode of Family Guy last week? Takes less than a half hour to get it on BT, but on eMule, you'd be watching it live on fox before you'd even begin to download it on eMule.

      Personally, it's all about the users. Maybe I should be glad that BT is less popular than eMule...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    182. Re:A step in the right direction... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Assuming this is the 0.01 minority, this means that there would have to be 25 million gun shootings in the US each day. Each year, every one in the US would have been shot... twelve times.

      Obviously, that's because you guys have those magic bullets that killed Kennedy.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    183. Re:A step in the right direction... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Pull the firearm and the robber shoots you before you've had a chance to lock and load. Seriously professional criminals if they belive the target is going to be armed will be equaly

      Umm, I'm 'locked and loaded' while still in bed. Give me a minute and I'll have the gunsafe open and my remington 1187 in hand.

      Seriously professional criminals(burglers/thieves at least) tend to AVOID homes like mine. Surveys of criminals in the states show that they're more afraid of encountering an armed victim than a cop. The hot burglary rate(house occupied at the time) in the states is a fraction of that in England.

      You come into my house with the intention of shootine me ,then i will either disarm you and beat the crap out of you or you will shoot me -Simple as that .

      Well, I wasn't really thinking of shooting you, I was thinking more along the lines of emptying your house of valuables, but ok. Assassination is more difficult to deal with than the random violent thug/burglar. By the way, if I'm not entering the house intending to kill you, resisting unarmed is statistcally the worst thing you can do.

      If i have a gun i pull it on your and you pull yours on me. What hapens then .. eh. Either you shoot me or i shoot you , Either way someone could die ,

      Interesting comma usage, is english your second language? But anyways. Yes, nothing is assured in a gunbattle. Both parties could miss(it happens!), both parties could hit(incapacitation from gunshot wounds can easily take minutes), one party could hit(hopefully the good guy). I practice shooting, most criminals do not. Private citizens who end up using their firearm in self defense 'win' in the majority of cases.

      and honestly i couldnt live with that if i took a human life.

      That's your decision. On the other hand, I value the life of the criminal far less my own or other innocents life.

      I used to work as a bouncer and im fairly well trained in self-defense so perhaps im not a perfect example . though..

      And I'm far more trained in the usage of firearms than the average criminal. But I was just suggesting a scenario. You must be a pretty big guy(or at least those are the types hired as bouncers around here), most likely the criminals will nip along the street to grandma's house instead.

      Ever hear of prevention being better than cure .

      Sure. I lock my doors. But I'm not quite at the point of being able to afford polycarbon armored windows and such. I can't live in a shell my entire life. I also go out all the time.

      Well if you cant toaly prevent it then why do you want a fatal resolve .Why not a non-leathel form of defense.

      I don't. But I want to make sure that I'm the winner in such a conflict. They haven't developed a non-lethal defense that's as effective as a firearm yet. Also, it might seem weird, but having the potential of lethal defense means that I'm less likely to have to use it. After all, what does the rapist have to really fear from a woman who pulls out pepper spray or a tazer? He can just come on. At worst it'll disable him for a little bit. If she pulls out a firearm, he's looking at deadly consquences. At that point, he's far more likely to run or surrender than to continue the assault.

      such as a bola gun or net gun.
      Too big. One usage.

      or how about a some form of spray or a high powerd tazer.

      Sprays are not 100%. There is a percentage of population who are immune or can resist it. It's often windy enough here that you'd have to be in arms reach for it to work. Same with the tazer, especially when you consider that the models that are sold to 'civilians' are weaker than the police models. They're one shot, and can become lodged in heavy clothing. Meanwhile any one of my semiautomatic pistols will penetrate any clothing not crossing the li

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    184. Re:A step in the right direction... by Daytura · · Score: 1


      However, kosher animals I believe are humanely shot, right?

      Totally wrong. This is a common misconception.

      To qualify as kosher, an animal must only be healthy and moving at point of death. This was a logical criterion back in 50BC, since it discouraged people from eating carrion - dead and (most likely) infected meat - which might cause food poisoning. Similarly, thou shalt not eat pork (may carry bacteria if not well cooked) and thou shalt not eat shellfish (may beget queasiness).

      Fast forward two thousand years, and meat production works on factory scales. However, the same rules still apply - meat isn't kosher unless the animal was healthy and moving when it died. So if we want kosher meat, we have to find a rabbi who'll kill the animal when it's still moving. No anaesthetic, no stun gun, no bolt thrower, because in these cases then the animal would no longer no be moving (sentient) at time of death. So the rabbi slits its throat while it stands. Yep, it's still kosher, and hell, it's pretty humane as far as brutally slashing the throats of animals is concerned, because at least it's executed (pun intended) by a rabbi. I won't even start on the laws about blood-draining.

      Fast forward a little more to 1990. Abattoirs know that animals who've had their throats slit when standing can be sold as kosher. Great. But some evil bastard figures out that since gentiles don't give a damn whether animals are kosher or not, hey, we may as well just make them *all* kosher. It's cheaper. They can be sold even though their throats were slit as they stood, and whadda you know, it saves costs on anaesthetics and stun guns.

      The upshot: all meat is kosher, and *none* of it is humanely killed.

      Review your morals, and kick your rabbi in the ass next time you see him.

    185. Re:A step in the right direction... by susa-no-o · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is totally, completely ridiculous. You are almost three times as likely to die if there's a gun in your house than if there isn't. If guns had some amazing self defense value where only .1 % (!) of the time you had to actually shoot it, then the mortality rate would be lower because if there's a gun in your house, you could defend yourself from murder better. Just from googling it (which apparently you can't be bothered to do), I believe you're referring to "Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review". In this paper, the conclusion is that there is no strong evidence that right to carry laws either increase crime, or decrease crime. They conclude that more research must be carried out. I'm inclined to agree. Guns don't increase crime, but they don't decrease crime, either. If you want to go around waving a gun, thinking it makes you safer, go ahead, but don't blame me when that gun blows up in your face.

    186. Re:A step in the right direction... by bechthros · · Score: 1

      "Give me a minute"

      BWAAHAHAHAHAHA. Yeah. OK. I'm only there to rob your house, but fuck, why not. I'll be sportsmanlike and let you open your gun safe. Go ahead. Just make one move towards it while I've got my gun trained on you. Go ahead. Why, your hands are shaking so hard you could barely spin the dial even if I let you get that far. What's the matter?

      Don't trust me?

      Oh, that's rich. Thank you for this evening's entertainment. I hope you realize that in trying to refute his argument, you just totally proved it.

      It's called "the drop", and when somebody gets it on you, it doesn't matter how many guns you have or what kind of bullets they use. You, like anybody else, are going to give them your wallet, ask them to please not hurt you, and wait for it all to be over so you can file your insurance claim.

      I suppose you could always shoot him in the back, but then you'd be going to jail for a long time. Use of deadly force to protect property is strictly prohibited in the US. Once his back was turned you'd have a very hard time saying your life was in danger, and forensic experts are very very good at putting together the location of a gunshot wound with the location in the room of all the blood. Believe it or not, you're actually not smarter than the cops.

      It doesn't matter that you think he's gonna avoid your house. It doesn't matter that you practice shooting or how well trained you are. It doesn't matter that you think the criminal is more afraid of you than a cop. It doesn't matter that England has more burglary. Those are just pretty little thoughts that you can think in your head - as you're handing over your wallet and asking him not to hurt you or your family.

      In life, you have two choices - you can choose to be good and do right, lock your doors and windows, get a security system and a safe room, not live the ghetto, and take sensible precautions. But also accept that, occasionally, you will be victimized and be helpless to stop it, whether by unfair taxes, or illness and death, or a stock market crash, or a gun stuck in your back as you walk down the street on a saturday night. And find yourself on the upside of life more often than not.

      Or, you could choose to be the bad guy, get caught up in the glamour of violence, keep telling yourself that the world is out to get you and it's only a matter of time until they do - and get the drop on others before they get the drop on you. And find yourself on the downside, again and again and again.

      Choose your path. Because I've been on the business end of a handgun, I've run with Kings, I've driven getaway cars and I've seen people with their faces surgically fucking removed by shotgun blasts die in the street for nothing more than shit-talking about the wrong person. Because with all your hypothesizing, NRA statistic-quoting, and rationalization, I can tell you for a fact, sir, that you have shot exactly JACK SHIT in terms of human beings, and I can tell you exactly what you would do in a robbery situation where somebody got the drop on you, "firethorn."

      You would hand over. Your fucking. Wallet.

    187. Re:A step in the right direction... by dcam · · Score: 1

      True, however some are more suited to evil use than good use.

      Torture equipment would be a good example of this.

      --
      meh
    188. Re:A step in the right direction... by Eivind · · Score: 1
      But you did not use your gun for what it was intended for or created for

      I most *definitely* did. Most of the shots where fired from a low-caliber competition rifle. This is entirely unsuitable for killing human beings.

      Everything about it, the design, the handling, the ammo, the aiming is optimised for shooting at still-standing targets while calm, with low pulse from a stable position. In other words, perfectly the oposite situation from the one you'd normally have if you where shooting at humans.

      Additionally the bullets would mostly cause small wounds and be considerably less fatal, even if you do hit, than those from a gun designed to kill.

      It is patently obvious that this rifle is not, in fact, designed to kill humans.

      The small rest of shots where fired from a shotgun. Here neither the gun, nor the ammo is designed to kill humans. Infact unless you stand very close to the gun even a direct hit would be unlikely to kill you (though it'd be painful.) Instead both the gun and the ammo are specially designed to efficiently kill birds. And that's what I've been using it for too. (well ok, some fake birds for practice)

      I

    189. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? Yo-yos, boomerangs, and darts were all originally weapons too.

    190. Re:A step in the right direction... by Splintax · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but I wouldn't say that's the only reason it hasn't "completely dominated" eMule (or eD2K more accurately). What about the fact that a lot of the stuff seeded on BT is in a format that requires extraction? People don't usually keep the original files they downloaded...

    191. Re:A step in the right direction... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      "Give me a minute"

      BWAAHAHAHAHAHA. Yeah. OK. I'm only there to rob your house, but fuck, why not. I'll be sportsmanlike and let you open your gun safe. Go ahead. Just make one move towards it while I've got my gun trained on you. Go ahead. Why, your hands are shaking so hard you could barely spin the dial even if I let you get that far. What's the matter?


      You're most likely going to have to break a window to get in. I hear somebody fumbling around in the dark. My safe is IN my bedroom. My safe takes a key(with me). Do this robber know what bedroom I'm sleeping in? I grab my shottie and call 911. Try my landline first - that gives them my address automatically. Cellphone is second. You open that door, and I'm shooting as soon as I verify that you're not somebody I know just acting stupid (They all know NOT to come in unannounced).

      Don't trust me?
      Nope, as you're rushing into my room, I'm unloading my 9mm into you from behind my bed.

      It's called "the drop", and when somebody gets it on you, it doesn't matter how many guns you have or what kind of bullets they use. You, like anybody else, are going to give them your wallet, ask them to please not hurt you, and wait for it all to be over so you can file your insurance claim.

      It's also called "condition white". Which I try to only be in inside my house. A large part about taking the line that 'I will not be an easy victim' is being aware. I pay attention to my surroundings. IE I do things like glance at the back seat of my car before getting in.

      I suppose you could always shoot him in the back, but then you'd be going to jail for a long time. Use of deadly force to protect property is strictly prohibited in the US.

      Not true under all circumstances in some areas of the states. But I won't bother you with the specifics as you've already stated that you won't be resisting with lethal force. Of course, you might kill the guy with your bare hands.

      Once his back was turned you'd have a very hard time saying your life was in danger, and forensic experts are very very good at putting together the location of a gunshot wound with the location in the room of all the blood. Believe it or not, you're actually not smarter than the cops.

      Actually, I'd tend to say that I'm smart enough to realize that the cops are very good at determining what happened during an investigation. Telling entry and exit wounds are dead easy.

      It doesn't matter that you think he's gonna avoid your house. It doesn't matter that you practice shooting or how well trained you are. It doesn't matter that you think the criminal is more afraid of you than a cop. It doesn't matter that England has more burglary. Those are just pretty little thoughts that you can think in your head - as you're handing over your wallet and asking him not to hurt you or your family.

      Oh, my family is with me? I'm still unmarried with no children, so mom shoots him. Or my father does.

      In life, you have two choices - you can choose to be good and do right, lock your doors and windows, get a security system and a safe room, not live the ghetto, and take sensible precautions.

      Pretty much. Dogs are the security system, when I build my own house the gun vault in the basement will double as the safe room. I don't live in the ghetto, but violence still occurs outside of them, and one of the sensible precautions I've taken is to obtain and become familiar with a firearm suitable for self-defense.

      But also accept that, occasionally, you will be victimized and be helpless to stop it, whether by unfair taxes, or illness and death, or a stock market crash, or a gun stuck in your back as you walk down the street on a saturday night. And find yourself on the upside of life more often than not.

      Can't do much about the rest of the stuff, but I can protect myself from the last one. Remember "Condition white"? I try to stay in "Yellow".

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    192. Re:A step in the right direction... by bechthros · · Score: 1

      "You're most likely going to have to break a window to get in."

      Nope. Glass cutters. You didn't hear a thing.

      "My safe takes a key(with me)."

      Rad! So while you're sleeping, I use my handy-dandy wire snippers or bolt cutters to remove the key from your body, open your safe, and add your super maximum awesome-o handgun to the list of things I'm going to successfully carry out of your house tonight.

      Of course, it might be light a bullet or two. Those I'll leave with you.

      "Nope, as you're rushing into my room"

      Actually, as I was entering your room quietly, you were sleeping. You wake up and there's a gun pointed at your head. At this point a gun hidden under your pillow wouldn't help, much less one in a safe on the other side of the room.

      This is called "me getting the drop on you."

      "'I will not be an easy victim'"

      Keep telling yourself that. I can guarantee you that, at some point in your life, you will be exactly that. I've seen drug dealers, pimps, and murderers with arsenals I'm sure even you would envy all be caught unawares and instantly overwhelmed. The only way you're going to be prepared to defend yourself with a handgun at all times, contrary to your protestations otherwise, is to live every second of your life - eating, sleeping, shitting and fucking - with a gun in your hand.

      "IE I do things like glance at the back seat of my car before getting in."

      a) how many times has there been anybody there?

      b) say there's somebody there. And the second you look into your back seat and see him, you see he's also got a gun pointed right at your head. Now what? Now you hand over your wallet.

      "Not true under all circumstances in some areas of the states."

      Well, I tell ya what. Why don't you shoot somebody in the defense of your property, and then, assuming they let you have access to a computer in prison, write me back and let me know how it turned out for you.

      "so mom shoots him. Or my father does."

      With what? The guns they had in their hands at the moment this guy accosted you? No, I'm afraid the minute they reached for anything that wasn't wallet-shaped and in their back pockets Mr. Assailant unloaded on them, and now they're dead. And now comes the fun part: you have to live the rest of your life with the knowledge that they died defending not only you, but a seriously flawed and irrational ideology.

      "Dogs are the security system"

      Poisoned steaks, co-ordinated tasers, or trank darts (if I'm humane) or sniper rifles (if I'm not) at a distance. Somebody who really really wants to rob you is going to rob you, and there's nothing you can do about it if they're determined enough. Same thing for somebody who wants you dead. You best defense is not to delude yourself into thinking you can fight fire with fire. Once you're in the crosshairs, you can't. Your best defense is a) don't make enemies you can't deal with and b) hand over your wallet and beg them not to hurt you.

      "I can protect myself from the last one"

      OK, let's walk through this scenario. You're at a festival, there's a crowd of people all around you. Suddenly, a gun is pressed into your back at the same time as "make a sound and you're dead" are whispered in your ear. Your arm is twisted behind your back and in less than ten seconds you are maneuvered into a more secluded spot. What do you do?

      Here's another one. You're out by yourself, walking down the street, minding your own business. You don't hear the guy sneak up behind you because he's wearing Air Jordans and there's a fair degree of ambient noise. Suddenly, a gun is in your back. What do you do?

      [In Keanu Reeves voice] What do you do?

      "I believe in holding to the high road."

      Then I encourage you to do so. Killing people is wrong. It doesn't matter if it's in self-defense, it doesn't matter how much of an asshole they are or how much they deserve it. You are not the Dungeon Maste

    193. Re:A step in the right direction... by DenDave · · Score: 1

      Oh I agree, and I am happy to argue the points of legitimacy. But you get my drift right? Let's keep it real... I live in europe and even though I may not always agree with our governments I do feel they have a degree of legitimacy, and certainly on the issue of legitimate monopoly on violence. It is a better world when the cops can deal with a car thief as opposed to when I would have to undertake that responsability myself.

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    194. Re:A step in the right direction... by DenDave · · Score: 1

      well that's why we had the (legitimate) there eh... I mean in a utopia there is no government and we all live peacefully and happily in grass skirts surfing all day long but..~~~we ain't in kansas toto~~~ and all of the countries/regimes listed in your link fail some tests on legitimacy...

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    195. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway the BT and gun analogy is misleading. I don't think anyone is going to die from the misuse of BT. Oh maybe those poor artists will starve to death because you downloaded all their CDs. But other than that.. no one.

      The analogy is a correct one in that is is showing, or trying to show, that items are not always used as they are intended. The results of this misuse is irrelvent to the analogy.

    196. Re:A step in the right direction... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Nope. Glass cutters. You didn't hear a thing.
      1. I'm not exactly the deepest of sleepers.
      2. Try navigating my house without making noise.
      3. I can only do my best. You can design a force to take anything. All you can do is make it difficult
      Rad! So while you're sleeping, I use my handy-dandy wire snippers or bolt cutters to remove the key from your body, open your safe, and add your super maximum awesome-o handgun to the list of things I'm going to successfully carry out of your house tonight.

      With me, not on me. I'll admit all you'd have to do would be fumble through my dirty laundry.
      And it's not a 'super maximim...' it's a basic model of a good quality handgun. Specifically a CZ75BD in 9mm. Functionally the same as the military M9 and many police guns.

      Actually, as I was entering your room quietly, you were sleeping. You wake up and there's a gun pointed at your head. At this point a gun hidden under your pillow wouldn't help, much less one in a safe on the other side of the room.

      Good luck opening my door quietly or quickly.

      But on the rest of the stuff, you seem to assume that the bad guys are all uber, so it doesn't make any sense to resist. My position is that they're pretty much all pathetic, or at least average, so you have a chance, and can prepare.

      Yes, if they manage to get the drop on me, I'm likely to cooperate. Part of my training is to try to prevent that though.

      As for my parents being shot, if it's one guy, he's going to have trouble keeping us all covered.

      For example, how the heck is the guy in the backseat going to get my wallet? I'm not in the car yet. The doors are closed. I can drop, backup and run.

      Killing people is wrong. It doesn't matter if it's in self-defense, it doesn't matter how much of an asshole they are or how much they deserve it.

      We have a fundimental difference in opinion, philosophy, and worldview then. I don't view killing people as wrong in all circumstances. I believe that self-defense is the biggest of the exemptions. I also have the view that I'm far more likely to be able to deploy my firearm than what you think. You seem to think that I'll have a 0% chance, I think that I'll have at least a 50-50. It's my choice on when I make that decision, until then the firearm stays hidden.

      Most criminals are out 'for themselves'. They don't want to take risks. In Texes, businesses that display the "30.06" sign forbidding CCW permit holders from carrying there have a far higher robbery rate than businesses that don't.

      There are tools in place, tools mich more effective then theoretical self-defense with handguns you never get the chance to draw, and their names are Police and Insurance.

      Interesting you should name the police and insurance together, as they're both there more to help clean up the mess afterwards. You're still a victim. Robbery isn't a huge deal like assault, rape, and murder.

      If you feel that your calling in life is to protect innocent people from harm at the hands of ruthless criminals, great. Your local police department is hiring. Until you work for them, or the Army, or the Sheriff's dept, you have no moral right wielding deadly force. Period

      Wrong DoD department, but oh well. My oath includes "Enemies foreign and domestic". Criminals(at least for crimes with victims) fall under 'the enemy' in my mind. That made me think about something else. You seem to be on the 'optimal personal chance of survival' strategy. I'm far more on the 'stop the enemy' strategy. I also think that your assumption that the crooks will always 'get the drop' is vastly misplaced.

      I also seriously object to the idea of governments having a monopoly of force. That's how genocides tend to get started.

      And the NRA, at least until recently, was a bunch of pansies. I'm a member of GOA(Gun Owners of America).

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    197. Re:A step in the right direction... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      legitimate monopoly on violence

      I believe that nobody should have a monopoly on violence, lest they misuse it.

      It is a better world when the cops can deal with a car thief as opposed to when I would have to undertake that responsability myself.

      But what happens when the criminals want more than just the car, and a cop isn't in sight?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    198. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no they carry them to shoot people.

      intimidation is never a reason to have a gun.

      you only draw a weapon when you absolutely plan to use it

    199. Re:A step in the right direction... by dahlek · · Score: 1
      Hogwash. Sex is fun because we evolved that way, and humans have, via our evolved brains, been using various forms of birth control since, probably, pre-history.

      99% of the time, sex does not lead to procreation.

    200. Re:A step in the right direction... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You, like an amazingly large number of slashdot posters, appear to completely lack the parody gene. This gene allows people to recognize parody when they see it. People who lack the gene are unable to make that discrimination and thus tend to go on and on about something that is blatantly obvious to the rest of humanity.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    201. Re:A step in the right direction... by dahlek · · Score: 1

      No, I just have the watch-out-for-religious-nuts gene, and it tends to activate these days before the parody gene kicks in.

    202. Re:A step in the right direction... by dahlek · · Score: 1

      Oh - I forgot to mention - I have evidence that I do have a parody gene - click the link in my sig ;)

    203. Re:A step in the right direction... by DenDave · · Score: 1
      yep yep yep.. but wake up and smell the coffee..
      Anarchy is a dream just as utopian as communism..
      Lets all just be pragmatic here and ensure that government is as best as possible and not leave the use of violence to the strongest monkey in the jungle, okay?
      But what happens when the criminals want more than just the car, and a cop isn't in sight?
      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    204. Re:A step in the right direction... by DenDave · · Score: 1
      But what happens when the criminals want more than just the car, and a cop isn't in sight?
      .. meant to include.. The law in most "civilised" countries forsees the use of violence as a last resort but still, self-defence is a tough call.
      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    205. Re:A step in the right direction... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Anarchy is a dream just as utopian as communism

      I'm not advocating anarchy. I should note that the government in 'my world' would still have a very large stick. It's just that it wouldn't be the only one with a stick, and could be overwhelmed by the little guys with their sticks if it becomes necessary.

      Lets all just be pragmatic here and ensure that government is as best as possible

      Certainly. You should see some of the letters I send to my congresscritters. I vote too. I might even assist in campaigning next time.

      not leave the use of violence to the strongest monkey in the jungle, okay?

      That's why I like having the guns spread around. They weren't called 'The great equalizer' for nothing. Everything from a 400 pound-linebacker to his 90 year old grandmother can use one. Suddenly the 100 pound gorilla is actually a threat to the 800 pound one.

      The law in most "civilised" countries forsees the use of violence as a last resort but still, self-defence is a tough call.

      Maybe it's my background, but I forsee the usage of violence in self-defense as a whole lot earlier than 'last resort'. Submitting is last resort, depending on circumstance. Pleading for your life is a last resort. For a while, at least in California, rape wasn't considered justification for usage of lethal force. At the same time, the maximum penalty for rape in the military was death.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    206. Re:A step in the right direction... by DenDave · · Score: 1
      That's why I like having the guns spread around.
      Somehow having everyone own a gun doesn't strike me as being conductive to my feeling safe. The fact that I live in a place where gun ownership is illegal and severely punishable by law makes me feel a whole lot safer, especially after having sworn at my neighbour this morning for his parking up against my bumper. I am sure he feels the same way about it.
      For a while, at least in California, rape wasn't considered justification for usage of lethal force.
      Whilst I am sure that rape occurs here, it doesn't present the level of threat in the voting mind-share to allow for the excesses of liberal gun legislation to be considered less of a problem then what you started out with. A rapist on a street without a gun had better hope no-one witnesses his act or he'd be in a heck of pickle, even without a gun in everyone's pocket.
      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    207. Re:A step in the right direction... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      makes me feel a whole lot safer

      Key word here: feel.

      especially after having sworn at my neighbour this morning for his parking up against my bumper

      Do you have a rage problem? Are you sure that over something that stupid you'd go postal? I know that I wouldn't.

      My area has better than 80% household gun ownership, and a portion of that 20% answered 'none of your business'. Yet I don't feel unsafe. Our murder rate is so low that a single murder in the state is news for weeks. Matter of fact, I feel safer here than I would somewhere that restricts gun ownership.

      I personally own 5 handguns, and 6 rifles, 3 of which are military pattern, though 2 are WWII design. All but two I would consider suitable for hunting deer. WWII battle rifles make good deer rifles.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    208. Re:A step in the right direction... by DenDave · · Score: 1

      Did you know that the IQ curve is a normal curve?
      did you know that the middle of it is IQ 100?
      That means that half of your gun owners have problems with fractions.. but heck, I am not gonna tell the US how to run their affairs.. I sure wish they would return the favour.

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    209. Re:A step in the right direction... by MonkeyOfRage · · Score: 1

      You are almost three times as likely to die if there's a gun in your house than if there isn't.

      I'd be 300% likely to die if I had a gun?

      As long as you're Googling anyway, try queries for "Morton Grove" and "Kenneshaw". Morton Grove, Il. outlawed handgun ownership some years ago, and got national press. The impact on crime, as you suggest, was arguably negligible. Keneshaw, Ga. also wanted some free press - so in response they mandated handgun ownership. Most categories of crime seemed unaffected, but their property crime went down. I speak only for myself, of course, but I do think I would prefer to rob a house in Morton Grove.

      The comparison was especially interesting to me because the two are so demographically similar; they're of a similar size and composition, had fairly stable crime rates over the same period of time, and enacted their laws in fairly close proximity to each other.

    210. Re:A step in the right direction... by MonkeyOfRage · · Score: 1

      No, guns are designed to kill.

      To be pedantic, they're designed to put holes in things at a distance. If the things you prefer to put holes in happen to be alive, that's your hangup; give me a bunch of soda cans in an old quarry and I'm set for the afternoon.

    211. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are obviously not married are you? sex ends with marriage, most notably when kids enter the picture.

  2. Yeah, but where's the Spyware by __aawfbm2023 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think Exeem has anything to worry about.

    1. Re:Yeah, but where's the Spyware by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Azureus, Tools -> Console

      It's recording everything I do!

  3. Torrent distribution by Joakim+A · · Score: 4, Informative

    Torrents could be distributed in the swarms too. Possibly according to user preferences if the swarm has many torrents/many types of data. Could get really nice. We do need a python version though..

    (Cant access the linked sites due to company policy (they allow /. :) so i don't know if this is supported.)

    1. Re:Torrent distribution by Errtu76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We do need a python version though..

      No we don't. This (java) version works perfectly already. Why does this _need_ to be ported?

    2. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that JIT compiling can be a very good thing for the speed of a program and Azureus is a very fast program, but Azureus killed all my computers by the RAM it needs: 512MB is almost not enough for Azureus and this is why I don't use it anymore.

    3. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look at the screenshots: Azureus has an IRC client embedded! This is where I draw the line and say that this program is seriously bloated.

    4. Re:Torrent distribution by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No we don't. This (java) version works perfectly already. Why does this _need_ to be ported?

      It doesn't _need_ to be ported. There are at least two possible reasons to do so anyhow, one "moral", one pragmatic:

      * It's difficult to distribute the Java runtime environment for some Linux distributions due to licensing issues. That means that for some of the most popular distros, installing Azureus is decidedly non-trivial for someone that's not fairly familiar with non-standard installation.

      * If you are using no other Java app on the system (I don't), the footprint of Azureus + JavaVM is very sizeable. Having something run under a VM that's in use anyhow makes the app use much less resources.

      Bonus reasons is that more alternative clients will shake out bugs and issues with the system, and will encourage further experimentation and exploration of the system and the UI.

      At the same time, porting it (or reimplementing in another client) takes away exactly zero from the Azureus developers or users. It's a win-win situation.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:Torrent distribution by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      I don't quite agree with you on the java issue. I mean, jre from sun/java.com comes as an installer that only requires you to ./run-it and follow instructions. True about the distro's and licensing. That's why Gentoo prompted me with an url where i should download it (manually). Even for newbies this should be doable.

    6. Re:Torrent distribution by afd8856 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because it needs X to run. I want to run it remote, in console version.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    7. Re:Torrent distribution by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      We do need a python version though.

      Oh please, why that ? I have not much against py but I do have against py-written apps. I had so much trouble with such apps, that I avoid anything related to it if I can. You can call this FUD spreading, but that was not my intention, it just what happened. If you want so much to port the stuff, make it c+gtk or c+qt or c# based, it still would be multi-platform. I don't have anything against the java client, still, I always used other torrent clients (like bitcomet) because of speed and/or stability.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    8. Re:Torrent distribution by JanneM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "only ./run-it" is enough to bring most people to a screeching halt. Not to mention you first have to figure out that you need something named Java, that you get it from Sun's website and then figure out on that site what you are supposed to download (which really isn't trivial even if you do know what you are doing - is it EE, RE or DE? Do I need stuff like JavaBeans?).

      For all intents and purposes, if it can't be pulled down and installed automatically as part of the application install process, that precludes the use by the large majority of users.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    9. Re:Torrent distribution by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
      This is really a non-issue, on most distributions Java is either included or easily installable through the distributions tools.

      If your distribution limits your choices according to some religious view of software you might not share, then change distribution.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    10. Re:Torrent distribution by ratpack91 · · Score: 3, Informative

      you can run azureus headless and control it from the web interface- link

    11. Re:Torrent distribution by golgotha007 · · Score: 3, Informative

      ALthough Azureus is one of the better java written applications I've used, it still feels like java.

      Everything updates just a little slow. You can be downloading via torrent something and have like 18%.
      Then, go to another workspace and then later when I click back onto the Azureus workspace, it still shows 18% for about a second, then bam, all the values update. It's not my machine (p4,3.0ghz, gig ram).

      Azureus, as an application, totally rules. It would be excellent in C or even python.

    12. Re:Torrent distribution by willdenniss · · Score: 1

      But, doesn't python run though a VM too? That really voids the argument that it should be ported to Python for that reason?

      Really, I don't think it matters. The portability for me (I use OS X, Linux and Winodws) makes the small cost of a VM well worth it.

      Will.

    13. Re:Torrent distribution by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      At the same time, porting it (or reimplementing in another client) takes away exactly zero from the Azureus developers or users. It's a win-win situation.

      I don't buy into the logic that creating competing open source projects automatically is a win-win situation. I can in fact come up with several negative consequences (this applies to all projects, not just Azureus).

      Many projects means developers will be spread thin, negating the old "Many eyes make all bugs shallow". Developers for Azureus will have to work harder to implement new things and fix bugs, since developers who could have helped them are working on other projects.

      More projects gives more choice to the users, but that also means they have to invest time in researching which best suit their needs.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    14. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that seems complicated to some, but you seem to be ignoring the fact that Azureus is one of the most popular projects on Sourceforge and has been for many months. Its also one of the most popular clients for torrents, and torrents are some of the most popular ways to transfer files.

      So your statement that the large majority of users can't install it is in complete and total conflict with reality.

      Are you people honestly suggesting that python is a better platform than java for a cross platform program???

    15. Re:Torrent distribution by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      Azureus, as an application, totally rules. It would be excellent in C or even python.

      Then why isn't there a corresponding application in C or Python? How do you know that re-implementing them in another language doesn't create new bugs (security issues for C, for instance) that using Java has eliminated?

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    16. Re:Torrent distribution by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      You can blame SWT for that. Especially now that Java 1.5 is around, SWT is a hell of a lot slower than Swing.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    17. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you are really unlucky your distribution (Fedora) provided that crappy GNU Java clone and symliked it all over the place. Doesn't really limit your choices, but does raise the bar needed to get Sun java installed.

    18. Re:Torrent distribution by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      Bastards aren't they for installing gcj. In a manner that means you can actually try and use it. And documentation on how to install java from sun. The gits even use the alternatives system so you can flick between your multiple jre/jdks at leisure. Bastards. I just don't know what they were thinking.

      --

      jh

    19. Re:Torrent distribution by JanneM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many projects means developers will be spread thin, negating the old "Many eyes make all bugs shallow". Developers for Azureus will have to work harder to implement new things and fix bugs, since developers who could have helped them are working on other projects.

      These would be developers who really know and like working in Python - rather than Java - to begin with. If they didn't do a Python reimplementation, they would do another Python project, not help on Azureus.

      And as I wrote, doing a reimplementation does help shake out bugs and mistakes in the protocol and implementation.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    20. Re:Torrent distribution by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

      GNU Classpath and JamVM are smaller and faster than Suns JRE but they may not run Azureus yet. IIRC Azureus uses native GUI widgets by way of the Eclipse SWT so if JamVM supports the required communication methods between VM and System alright, then it won't be too hard to run.

    21. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is the most popular download -- the double-click-for-dummies Windows installer or the bare JAR file?

      I'm sure uncle bob has no problem reading the fine manual, installing SWT, figuring out his classpath, and then typing:
      java -cp swt.jar:Azureus2.jar -Djava.library.path=. org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main

    22. Re:Torrent distribution by Errtu76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I didn't look at the screenshots. I do have the application running at home, so i can tell you that this client is a plugin. And according to my knowledge of plugins, it means it can be disabled.

      Correct me if i'm wrong. I start to doubt as well now (not that it's bloated - only an (minimalistic) irc client doesn't make an app bloated) wether or not it can be removed/disabled.

    23. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because Java, besides being unfree and not portable [*], wastes enormous resources on target systems, for example making impossible, or at least much harder, the use of old and obsolete systems for networked grunt work like serving files.

      * Java is _not_ portable, neither are Java programs. The Java environment is proprietary, thus nobody can port it to a platform of choice or modify it, and Java programs are subject to it, hence they're not portable too.

      Please don't reply "parts of Java are open source"
      because I'd reply that though part of Nvidia video drivers are open source, nobody could write an OSS Nvidia driver yet.

    24. Re:Torrent distribution by VortexMK · · Score: 1

      That's one good argumented nitpicking.

    25. Re:Torrent distribution by 3rdParty · · Score: 1

      there is, just not on linux. Check out bitComet, if you have some form of Windows. Azureus is a textbook example of why Java blows. There is only one thing Java is good at, and that is cros-platform "binaries." Oh, and hogging resources.

      There is at least one decent linux BT client, but it runs ina terminal window. I cannot recall the name, and conveniently removed it with the rest of the dross the last install :doh:

    26. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Failed presupposition:

      The number of developers are not constant. Open source projects are NOT limited by availability of developers per se - they're limited by how compelling they make it for developers to be involved, and the internal communication bandwidth of the project.

      People do what they think is fun. If you want more developers: Make it more fun to be a developer, for instance by lowering the hazzle to start contributing. (Oh, and that's why CVS and Subversion sucks.)

      Eivind.

    27. Re:Torrent distribution by badfish99 · · Score: 1

      Must be bloody slow then.
      In my experience (and I'm a Java developer), Java on a fairly recent PC with lots of memory runs reasonably fast, so long as you don't try to use Swing, and you don't count the load time in your performance figures.
      But Java on anything older than a year or two is pretty well unusable. I can run plenty of C or Python apps on an old 266MHz machine that I use for a web server, but I wouldn't dream of putting Java on it.

    28. Re:Torrent distribution by jridley · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd like to see it ported to something other than Java. I really like Azareus's interface, and it works well, but it scales horribly. I really can't use it. I tried it out and it seemed good, then I tried using it as my main service, and it just destroyed my system. Try seeding 30 or 40 torrents out of a modest (2GHz, 1GB RAM) machine sometime. It's horrible. If you're web browsing, editing/encoding video, using PhotoShop, scanning film, etc on the same machine, you'll be crying.

      By contrast, BitComet (or multiple BitTornado instances) can do that and I don't even know it's running.

      If all you're doing is leeching, then Azareus is great. I do recommend it to people. But BitComet is more scalable. I also use BitTornado for a day or two on new torrents, because BitComet doesn't super-seed.

    29. Re:Torrent distribution by k98sven · · Score: 4, Informative

      GNU Classpath and JamVM are smaller and faster than Suns JRE but they may not run Azureus yet.

      No, JamVM (although extremly small ~200kB) isn't anywhere near as fast as the Sun JRE. JamVM is an interpreter, not a JIT VM. But it's fast as far as VMs go.

      If you want a Classpath-based VM which is fast you should look at Jikes RVM or Kaffe, or perhaps consider compiling to native with GCJ.

      Azureus uses native GUI widgets by way of the Eclipse SWT so if JamVM supports the required communication methods between VM and System alright, then it won't be too hard to run.

      JamVM handles native calls without problems. I've run Eclipse and other SWT apps on it myself.

      However, Azureus doesn't run on Classpath yet. It's very close to it.. But there's still one or two small issues with the Classpath libraries. If someone wants to help out with this, email the classpath list (classpath@gnu.org) or drop in on #classpath on FreeNode. You'll be 'liberating' Azureus and helping free java at the same time.

    30. Re:Torrent distribution by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      It's a shame for you. I used to run an Orion Application Server on a machine of that specification, and it ran perfectly fine. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    31. Re:Torrent distribution by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Three letters for you
      G.P.L .. of which java is not under .
      Alot of folks like to stick to using pure GPL code only on their systems (or witha mix of a few other Open source licenses) IE: Debian for example.
      Fair enough there are things like Blackdown , but incompatibilitys arise .

      that and as a previous poster already stated the overheads of running just one java-app

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    32. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The python runtime is pretty small and is loaded instantly. Java takes forever to get going, and gobbles up considerably more memory. Don't forget the original BT client was actually written in python.

      I really don't understand people like you. What difference does it make whether someone reimplements something in another language? It takes nothing away from you.

    33. Re:Torrent distribution by X.25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No we don't. This (java) version works perfectly already. Why does this _need_ to be ported?

      Erm... because you can't run it in the background over SSH session on another server through 56kbit link? Or just choose any other reason...

    34. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, doesn't python run though a VM too? That really voids the argument that it should be ported to Python for that reason?

      No. It is trivial to cross-compile a complete Python-environment for a new architectue, whil you are neither allowed nor able to compile a working Java-runtime.

      I had to do this for my Sharp Zaurus.

      Use anything besides Win-i32/64 or Linux-i32/64, and see how far Java's so-called portability goes.

    35. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here is only one thing Java is good at, and that is cros-platform "binaries."

      And even this if platforms = [ 'win-ia32', 'win-ia64', 'linux-ia32', 'linux-ia64-a-bit-supported-but-dont-rely-on-it']

      I'll never understand how Sun gets away selling this as cross-platform.

    36. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Java sucks?

      Limewire was a pretty good Gnutella client but I was rarely ever able to use it because Java is a pain in the ass to get working. I had it working but then something would change (like I changed distros) and I had to go through the pain of setting up Java again.

      Plus it has a huge memory footprint.

      Pfffft, screw that. Java sucks.

    37. Re:Torrent distribution by ArgyleAgent · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? Have you ever tried programming GUIs or, god have mercy on our souls, an internet application in C?!

      Java is perfectly suited for applications like Azureus. It's ability to work and look similiar across multiple platforms (meaning less time spent programming multiple versions) means the developers can spend more time working on what really matters: a good BT client.

      So what if the GUI stalls a smidge, it actually does what it's supposed to do, and took a hell of a lot less time to develop than if it had been in a different language.

    38. Re:Torrent distribution by generationxyu · · Score: 1

      Because Azureus runs like a lazy snail crawling through molasses in January on an incline. Plus, I don't want to have to use 1.5 gig of swap space to download a 100 MB file.

      --
      I mod down pyramid schemes in sigs.
    39. Re:Torrent distribution by XMyth · · Score: 1

      No, it's a plugin. It is not embedded.

    40. Re:Torrent distribution by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      not that it's bloated - only an (minimalistic) irc client doesn't make an app bloated
      That's your opinion. But anyway, we all know that the irc client is just a milestone on the way to Azureus-the-email-client (Zawinski's Law).
    41. Re:Torrent distribution by mkw87 · · Score: 0, Troll

      the java version works....i wouldn't say perfectly. I have been using Azureus for almost two years now, and have no problems with it other than it is written in java....which is a horrible language. It takes up a bit too much memory for just downloading torrents. My roomate talks about java all time (he's a programmer) and how shitty it is, boy was he pissed when he had to take an entire class devoted to programming in it. needless to say he didnt do any of his work in there and dropped the class. anyways, back to the point, an azureus-similar program, not in java, would be a very nice alternative. (note: i have not used any other bittorrent programs for lack of wanting to install-configure-not like and start process over again, so there may be a much better alternative, as i know there are quite a few)

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
    42. Re:Torrent distribution by beef3k · · Score: 1

      Well, there's hopefully no need to port, but Azureus does have serious performance issues. Have you ever monitored it's CPU usage? It periodically spikes to 100%.

      If you use it on a laptop that's instantly annoying as the fan kicks in. On my 3GHz dekstop system it became annoying when I popped in a DVD and got decoding glitches because of Azureus (increasing PowerDVD's priority solved most of it, but it's still annoying to adjust the priority every time).

      For that reason I've switched over to BitTornado which isn't really quite as good, but at least it's responsive and doesn't eat your CPU time. Until they bother to profile and fix the performance issues in Azureus I'm not going back.

    43. Re:Torrent distribution by westlake · · Score: 1
      So your statement that the large majority of users can't install it is in complete and total conflict with reality.

      Simply navigating Sourceforge can be intimidating to users accustomed to Download.com.

    44. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please tell me how to get this to work on ly Ultrasparc 10 running Gentoo.

      i cant compile Java, for some reason Sun will not give me the source code.

      got an answer to that one?

    45. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is only one thing Java is good at, and that is cros-platform "binaries." Oh, and hogging resources.

      Yeah, which is why it has become the lingua franca of the business world, is the language most schools teach, and is the second most popular language on Sourceforge after C++.

    46. Re:Torrent distribution by ultranova · · Score: 1

      These would be developers who really know and like working in Python - rather than Java - to begin with. If they didn't do a Python reimplementation, they would do another Python project, not help on Azureus.

      Or they could be developers that - shock and awe - know both Python and Java, or are willing to learn what they don't know.

      I mean, I really like the real Basic (you know, the one with things like "goto 10" - it's the best tool for learning programming) but I've still managed to code in other languages (Pascal (both Delphi and Turbo), C, Java, Python, SQL, .BAT, Bash command lines ;) and I'm not a genius by any definition. So I'd imagine that Real Coders might also know more than a single language.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    47. Re:Torrent distribution by neuro88 · · Score: 1

      You can blame SWT for that. Especially now that Java 1.5 is around, SWT is a hell of a lot slower than Swing.

      Yes, this is exactly why. Though I think it's more accurate to say that using SWT outside of Windows is slow. My understanding is that SWT is optimized for Windows and nothing else. The speed difference between Eclipse and other SWT apps on Linux and Windows is pretty huge. Is this also true when comparing SWT apps on Windows and OS X (and other OS's)?

    48. Re:Torrent distribution by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Because it needs X to run. I want to run it remote, in console version.

      Run it under VNC.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    49. Re:Torrent distribution by znaps · · Score: 1

      Man, that's nothing to do with Java..it's purely some programming decision. The fact that the UI paints as soon as you activate the window shows that the Java runtime knows that the window has been activated and has acted instantly. The status bar update code is probably a bit slow, but due to the algorithm used, not the language.

      Azureus is coded using a platform specific UI framework, not the standard Java Swing framework, and this removes the weak link that causes many so say that Java is slow.

    50. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a performance option. See Options -> Interface -> Display -> Update GUI every x sec/msec. By default it's set to "1 second".

      This is so your CPU will be more useful for other stuff like real work, while it's downloading in the background.

      It's probably a little too conservative in CPU usage here and there for your perception. But it's hellava more reponsive than other Java GUI apps I've seen. YMMV.

    51. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Can you point me at the jre for NetBSD/sgimips and OpenBSD/macppc? Or you just don't give a shit about freedom? That's what I thought.

    52. Re:Torrent distribution by danharan · · Score: 1
      there is, just not on linux
      There is only one thing Java is good at, and that is cros-platform "binaries."
      Yeah, it really blows that I can go from Windows to Linux to Mac and still use a familiar piece of software.
      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    53. Re:Torrent distribution by azuretongue · · Score: 1

      Everything updates just a little slow. You can be downloading via torrent something and have like 18%.
      Then, go to another workspace and then later when I click back onto the Azureus workspace, it still shows 18% for about a second, then bam, all the values update.

      Try tools->options->interface->display->update GUI every
      change this from 5 seconds to 100 mseconds

      There now it is much faster.
    54. Re:Torrent distribution by m50d · · Score: 1

      On my system, no speed demon but works fine, azureus takes 20-30 seconds to start up, and 1-2 seconds to display a menu after you click on it, with no other programs running. That's why.

      --
      I am trolling
    55. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is supported - eg you can paste something like magnet:?xt=urn:btih:DBI3XWM6QOEQUMTAXCI5RY45R3OMNM WM into your file->open->location, and it'll find a peer with a copy of the .torrent for you.

    56. Re:Torrent distribution by tdelaney · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I got no more than 10-15KB/sec download (approx same upload) on a Duron 1.3GHz with 512MB RAM while downloading the Azureus update (with approx 10000 seeds). No NAT issues. Didn't matter if I set it for 200 max connections or 5 - it was still limited to those speeds. It also severely affected the performance of the rest of my network (this has been established over the last week of using it).

      I downloaded BitComet last night and downloaded the Azureus update again. Immediately 50KB/sec (might have gone higher, but the files isn't that large) with much less impact on the rest of the network.

      I don't know what Azureus was doing, but it's gone.

    57. Re:Torrent distribution by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      If three textboxes, a simple text parser(the irc protocol is dead simple), and a network connection is enough to make a program bloated, I recommend using the text version of Bittorrent.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    58. Re:Torrent distribution by dave1g · · Score: 1

      Again, the purpose of writing a java app is not to milk out top efficiency, but to "write once, run everywhere" as Sun would say.

      Given that there are windows, and mac and then a thousand different linux distros, I can see why they chose a java version.

      "Azureus, as an application, totally rules. It would be excellent in C or even python."

      See if they were constantly worried about porting issues and compiling 80 versions of their code, and doing tech support for those that want to compile on their own, the application wouldnt be as developed as it is today.

    59. Re:Torrent distribution by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      In practice, CVS is useful because nobody cares that you made a bug fix that doesn't work with the current codebase, for a bug that doesn't exist in the current codebase.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    60. Re:Torrent distribution by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      There are on linux. I recall bittornado exists under Linux, for example.

      Java has perks other than cross-platform compatibility, but from your tone, I doubt you'd care much about security, ease of coding, and other things which are more than a little important compared to using a bit more resources than is ideal.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    61. Re:Torrent distribution by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're probably right. I run my Azureus on Linux, of course, where Java 1.5 Swing just got incredibly fast (it's more responsive than Firefox now, which should shut up a few people.) But any SWT apps are less responsive than any other apps on my system. Unless I run the Motif version, which is my current workaround. Perhaps GTK is just slow.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    62. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the settings for Azureus, you can tell it how often to refresh the stats. I think it comes set at two seconds by default.
      There's no reason to update that stuff when you're not looking at it, so Azureus waits until you open up the window to start the count again.
      I'm running Azureus on an AMD1ghz w/ 256 megs of ram w/ only as much lag as I set it to.

    63. Re:Torrent distribution by willdenniss · · Score: 1

      Mr Anonymous Coward,

      You are allowed to, and it is certainly possible to nativly compile Java apps. Look at Jet, or GCC. One does need to use SWT as the windowing API but I believe Azureus does (not 100% sure on that).

      Java also works excellently on OS X, and SOLARIS, and AIX, and...

      Some Apps are not very cross-platform friendly, but Azureus is.

      Will.

    64. Re:Torrent distribution by willdenniss · · Score: 1

      Honestly want's the point though?

      That person could be making a more useful contribution to some other project.

      We're not talking about an API here where it IS useful to have in heaps of languages, but an application.

      While he's at it, why doesn't he port _everything_ to python?

      Will.

    65. Re:Torrent distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " took a hell of a lot less time to develop than if it had been in a different language."

      Bold claims you make. How do you know this for *fact*?

    66. Re:Torrent distribution by kelnos · · Score: 1
      Are you kidding me? Have you ever tried programming GUIs or, god have mercy on our souls, an internet application in C?!
      Yes and yes. I'm not sure why you think that's such a difficult/bad idea.
      Java is perfectly suited for applications like Azureus. It's ability to work and look similiar across multiple platforms (meaning less time spent programming multiple versions) means the developers can spend more time working on what really matters: a good BT client.
      Yep, I'm totally with you here. Writing a good, multi-torrent BT app is hardly a trivial endeavor.
      So what if the GUI stalls a smidge, it actually does what it's supposed to do, and took a hell of a lot less time to develop than if it had been in a different language.
      Except that, if I run Azureus normally, with 3-5 torrents open, my system slows to a crawl, with even the mouse movement jerky. I don't have the fastest machine (Athlon 1.33GHz, 640MB RAM), but that's just unacceptable. If I renice Azureus up to +6 or so, my system is fine, but then Azureus' GUI takes quite a while to respond. I don't mind too much, since I usually just let it run, with RSSFeed automatically grabbing the things I want.
      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    67. Re:Torrent distribution by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

      Ever taken a look in the Tools>Options>Interface>Display> Update GUI every __? It probably says 1000ms in your particular case. Try changing that value to 500ms, 250ms, or even 100ms. Things will "feel" faster, I guarentee it.

    68. Re:Torrent distribution by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      that's good to know. I didn't knew it could do that. Thanks!

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    69. Re:Torrent distribution by stickyc · · Score: 1
      Funny - I do just that. Azureus in a VNC session following (more or less) the docs here. The VNC session lives completely in it's own space. I can VNC over SSH from anywhere and manage Azureus - seeding files, checking progress, etc. I also added an FTP drop box that Azureus monitors for new torrents, so I dont even need SSH if I find something I want to grab.

      Granted, at 56k, it's not particularly fast, but Azureus management doesn't really need to be.

  4. Downloaded using these new torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bad Pirates
    Whatcha want, watcha want
    Whatcha gonna do
    When sheriff RIAA come for you
    Tell me
    Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna dooo
    Yeaheah

    CHORUS:
    Bad Pirates, bad Pirates
    Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
    When the RIAA come for you
    (Repeat)

    When you were twenty
    And you had bad traits
    You go to College
    And learn the golden rule
    So why are you
    Acting like a bloody fool
    If you get hot torrents
    You must get cool

    CHORUS

    1. Re:Downloaded using these new torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey these posts need to be done quick.
      No time to think to much about it.

      Sorry.

    2. Re:Downloaded using these new torrents by FidelCatsro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      or to parody a parody using more Realistic terms

      Bad potential copyright infringers
      Whatcha want, watcha want
      Whatcha gonna do
      When the cartel known as RIAA come for you
      Tell me
      Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna dooo
      Yeaheah

      CHORUS:
      potential copyright infringers ,potential copyright infringers
      Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
      When the potential infringment lawsuit signed by the RIAA come for you(if you cant afford to defend)
      (Repeat)

      When you were twenty
      And you to save money
      You go to College
      And learn the golden rule
      you got screwed with a student loan
      and couldt afford much food
      If you get hot torrents
      you dont need to either starve or have fun

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    3. Re:Downloaded using these new torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KARMA WHORE!!!

      Do you even know why you're posting?

  5. This is great by giginger · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I hate when I stop a torrent, because I need to use my connection for something else, and I go to start it again and the tracker is down. Unless I'm mistaken surely this means this sort of thing won't happen much anymore?

    1. Re:This is great by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Informative
      I hate when I stop a torrent, because I need to use my connection for something else...

      Why would you have to shut it down for other things? You realize you can throttle the up/down torrent bandwidth within the application, don't you? In Azureus, you can change the values without having to restart the app, too.

    2. Re:This is great by giginger · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work too well for me though. I've throttled like Homer on Bart but it still takes all my bandwidth.

    3. Re:This is great by Kabal` · · Score: 2, Informative

      Azureus has for a while now, cached the results of your last successful tracker scrape. So you could close it, then reload it later and even before connecting to the tracker, still have a bunch of IP's ready to try.

    4. Re:This is great by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Where did you change the rates? You can change the up/down limits for the entire program or for individual torrents. (So if you had multiple torrents and only cut back one, the others would expand to fill the bandwidth.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:This is great by giginger · · Score: 1

      Bottom right hand corner of the screen. I believe that's the global settings...

    6. Re:This is great by giginger · · Score: 1

      Then there's something screwy on my machine...

  6. Using it now by fgl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After upgrading a few hours ago, I opened up the appropriate UDP prts as requested (pol;itely I might add) & watched the number of clients that I was trackerlessly connected to rise from ~50,000 ot more than 76,000
    I've used it for a long time now, but the latest itteration just seems to go beyond the call of duty.

    --
    Go Away! Not for Sale
    1. Re:Using it now by Handpaper · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is this a 'visible hosts' number or do you actually have 76000 open sockets?
      I'd love to see Win95/98 try to handle that :)
      Waiting for netstat to finish it's output could be fun, too.

    2. Re:Using it now by fgl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its the Estimated number of peers I can see.

      --
      Go Away! Not for Sale
    3. Re:Using it now by willdenniss · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's UDP so there's no sockets anyway. Datagrams are connectionless and have far less overheads.

      76,000 would still kill most apps though...

      Will.

    4. Re:Using it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the latest itteration just seems to go beyond the call of duty.

      It certainly goes beyond the Call of Duty alright - I just used it to get Half-Life 2...

    5. Re:Using it now by fgl · · Score: 1

      If anyone cares, its up to exactly ~85,058

      --
      Go Away! Not for Sale
    6. Re:Using it now by acariquara · · Score: 1

      Try 115.322 as of right now, and steadily climbing.

      Slashdot crowd is hiting it full force!

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  7. Why not ANts? by Nehle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This kind of thing is not new ANts P2P is a decentralized, encrypted anonymous protocol that works in the same way as BitTorrent. From the page "ANts P2P realizes a third generation P2P net. It protects your privacy while you are connected and makes you not trackable, hiding your identity (ip) and crypting everything you are sending/receiving from others." Why not give that a try?

    1. Re:Why not ANts? by ajs · · Score: 1

      "This kind of thing is not new"

      You're correct. In fact, there's a decentralized, searchable, swarming-download system that has been in place for years: Gnutella.

      Current itterations of Gnutella are very impressive, and if you port-forward UDP and TCP from your firewall, the performance for popular downloads is comparable to BT, but it's the performance of rare and unpopular downloads that makes Gnutella shine. I can leave a search open for something that I saw once, weeks ago, and when someone responds again, my download automatically resumes even though this person had no knowledge of the first person (e.g. no tracker, no database, just a search result with a name and a checksum).

    2. Re:Why not ANts? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Or why not gnunet? IME gnunet works better than ANTs, it has decent download speeds and a proper search function unlike freenet's goofy keys system. The selection of files isn't that wide, but that will improve if more people use it.

      --
      I am trolling
  8. Kind of been done... by Gilesx · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is a little like Shareaza.

    Shareaza has support for Gnutella, Gnutella 2, Edonkey and Bittorrent. As it provides a "bridge" between these networks, it means I am able to search for torrents from the two Gnutella networks, and edk. When I have this torrent, I can open it using the bittorrent part of Shareaza, and if that torrent is down, Shareaza will still hash the torrent and attempt to download the appropriate files from the Gnutella and eDonkey neworks. It's a nice idea, and really unites all the various p2p methods, using each method's strength to give an all round solid result.

    I'm surprised that it's taken Azureus this long to catch up, and I'm sure we'll start to see a lot more bittorrent clients either offering their own solutions to this issue, or as in the case of Shareaza, using existing p2p networks to give backup to the Bittorrent protocol.

    --
    Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    1. Re:Kind of been done... by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 0

      It's too bad that Shareaza is so unstable that it rarely stays up long enough to download a BitTorrent -size file.

    2. Re:Kind of been done... by Gilesx · · Score: 1

      It's been rock solid for me using Foresight Linux + Wine - 72 hours so far and counting :)

      Perhaps the stability issues are related more to the operating system it's used on, and how that operating system handles network sockets?

      --
      Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    3. Re:Kind of been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your point about Shareaza being a nice idea providing access to several P2P networks is right. In practice though, Shareaza doesn't play well with most of the torrents I have thrown at it. Azureus is like some kind of steroid fueled monster in comparison and always gets me the iso I want quickly. I stopped using Shareaza only a couple of weeks ago... after sticking with it in the vain hope it would become a useable application over the course of the last year. Shareaza failed to impress me. Azureus impresses me on a regular basis.

    4. Re:Kind of been done... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that it's taken Azureus this long to catch up, ...

      Catch up? You don't seem to understand what the new features in Azureus are. From what I can see, they are nothing like what you mention. Different solutions for different problems.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    5. Re:Kind of been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nothing like shareaza.

      The ehancements here aren't about bridging different networks, but a new way to do peer discovery.

      Instead of relying only on the tracer, clients now share 'mirror' information amongst themselves. Takes load off the tracers and offering increased reliability.

    6. Re:Kind of been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd, because the only stability problems I've seen with Shareaza are with the AVI preview feature and corrupt/partial downloads. Of course most other clients don't even have AVI preview.

      The real problem I had with Shareaza is that it doesn't seem to like to download from emule hosts.

    7. Re:Kind of been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, YOU are wrong. If two shareaza clients are on the same torrent, and the tracker goes down, they will still be able to find each other through the G2 network (and they will keep seeding for the other known peers). The only problem with Shareaza is that it's not popular enough (as a BT client) to have a noticable effect. This feature has been in Shareaza for a few years already. Shareaza can also finish a torrent without a tracker through G2, G1 and ed2k (if it has the right hashes), but that's a different feature.

    8. Re:Kind of been done... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Okay, cool. I didn't really get that impression from what the original poster said, though.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    9. Re:Kind of been done... by theArtificial · · Score: 0
      What about Share or WinNY?

      http://www.answers.com/topic/share-p2p I realize that WinNY is no longer being actively developed (Share seems to be the replacement) since the Creator was nabbed but it still has quite a following. Share is very quick (I usually get 100+kb/sec) it just takes a little while for your cache to build up. Both WinNY and Share are pretty anon, they work similar to freenet. While the content is more Japanese oriented there are english nodes. I still use eMule due to the variety however it isn't the quickest, I am sure there are popular mods that can adjust your score etc....

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    10. Re:Kind of been done... by minvaren · · Score: 1

      Check back once 2.2 (about to enter beta) is released, they've gotten that patched up pretty well. Stability has never been an issue with myself and Shareaza.

      --
      Big! Strong! Wow! Tada-O!
  9. Azureus is fast by illtron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I gained a lot of respect for Java apps when I tried Azureus for the first time. It was at least 6-7x faster than the official client or Tomato Torrent on OS X, and it connects to way more hosts for me. Like I said, I'm on OS X, so I've never tried exeem.

    Making it easier to get to torrents is all well and good, but let's keep in mind that most of the *legal* stuff available through bittorrent is easy to find as it is.

    --
    Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    1. Re:Azureus is fast by illtron · · Score: 1

      I couldn't get any bittorrent clients to connect on my girlfriend's G5 through her D-Link router (which has absolutely AWFUL setup pages, but at home, I had no problem at all getting any to connect.

      I'm sure there are so many different factors involved, but I was really shocked by how fast Azureus was for me. I haven't tried any on a PC, so I can't say for sure what would cause the difference. In the past, I'd take a Cocoa app over Java anyday on OS X, but this one changed my opinion.

      Maybe I'm just getting normal performance out of it and the official client and tomato were just really slow.

      As for java on PC, I can't even get Yahoo games to work on my nice new Dell at work. I've narrowed it down to two possibilities: 1) Windows sucks or 2)Bill Gates sucks. It requires further study.

      --
      Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    2. Re:Azureus is fast by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Most vaguely modern routers can do UPNP (even though it's often disabled by default), and so can Azureus and most other BT clients. In theory this should make NAT configuration a breeze. Just a hint if you didn't try this already.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    3. Re:Azureus is fast by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      One decent app doesn't justify the years and years of hype and proselytizing by the Java fanboys. The thousands of incredibly slow and shitty apps sorta offset it.

      It only proves it's possible to make Java not suck.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Azureus is fast by Politburo · · Score: 1

      As for java on PC, I can't even get Yahoo games to work on my nice new Dell at work. I've narrowed it down to two possibilities: 1) Windows sucks or 2)Bill Gates sucks. It requires further study.

      Here.. I'll play consultant for free..

      3) You suck.

    5. Re:Azureus is fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Azureus will even let you compare your speed to others using other clients. It estimates the downloading speed of others by recording how often they say they've received a chunk. In my experience, the fastest downloaders are always Azureus users.

    6. Re:Azureus is fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was that easy to find, there wouldn't be that many /.ers going on about how most torrents refer to copyrighted stuff, an assumption that is simply not true.

    7. Re:Azureus is fast by Halvy · · Score: 1

      the word 'LEGAL' is the most SUBJECTIVE word in the world.

      --
      I will gladly loose all of life's battles.. in order to win the war..
    8. Re:Azureus is fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's a big "duh". The official client is written with Python, which is an INTERPRETED language. Of course Java is faster, being recompiled from bytecode to native on the fly (Just-in-time aka JIT) on most platforms.

      Pure C would however be still faster.

    9. Re:Azureus is fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Azureus is a respectable Java app alright, but BitComet is still the best one I have seen. It's UDP firewall penetration and usability behind NAT walls are pretty essential for a lot of us.

      Then again, firewalls like on our campus that block torrent ports mean most of us still won't ever be able to share data until we find a torrent app that can do everything using just port 80.

  10. Trackerless & bittorrent sites with login by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How will the trackerless stuff interact with sites that require login? In the normal case you would login to the website and after that the tracker only allows you to connect from the same IP, but does the new trackerless thingie allow anyone to connect to these swarms? Might be (way too) good way to get past share ratio requirements.

    1. Re:Trackerless & bittorrent sites with login by WhiterThanWhite · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are a relatively large number of BT sites that require you to be a registered user before you can connect to their tracker. That being said, the latest Azureus seems to be able to sidestep logins once the packets leave the original site: There is no "secret security handshake" with the original site. Sounds like a kind of virus, doesn't it?

      --

      My computer is an IMSAI. Don't you love those paddle switches! Who can get by without blinking LEDs?

    2. Re:Trackerless & bittorrent sites with login by rale,+the · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, the trackerless stuff only kicks in if the central tracker(s) are unavailable. People who are able to connect to the main tracker wouldnt share the file to people who are on the distributed-db only... Or I might be misunderstanding, as the documentation is a bit sparse.

    3. Re:Trackerless & bittorrent sites with login by Poromenos1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is, that's why several sites are banning clients that use this.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    4. Re:Trackerless & bittorrent sites with login by nakaduct · · Score: 1

      That's a uniquely stupid solution.

    5. Re:Trackerless & bittorrent sites with login by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Per-share ratios are easily bypassed even without help from the client. Read the BT protocol specification carefully and you'll understand just how trivial it is.

  11. Lack of search... by Aragorn992 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    " or does the lack of search negate its effectiveness?"

    No the lack of search is exactly what differentiates the BitTorrent network (though its not really a network is it? It piggy backs off webservers) from other P2P apps.

    1. Re:Lack of search... by m50d · · Score: 1

      It's more of a protocol than a network, each swarm is effectively a separate network, but it is distinct from http. After all, gnutella does the actual downloading over http.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Lack of search... by urdine · · Score: 1

      Funny, I thought the "breaking up files into pieces and uploading while downloading so load is distributed" was the important part of BitTorrent.

  12. This is not anything new. by solidox · · Score: 5, Informative

    The bittorrent client BitComet has been doing this for a long time now.
    Simply what it does is shares lists of peers between clients for matching infohashes...
    It dosn't nessecerely decentralize it or remove the need for a tracker, as you need to get at least 1 ip from a member of the swarm (who has a compatible client)
    It can help to get new peers if a tracker fails half way through, but you still need the initial peers ips from a tracker or similar.

    --
    1. Re:This is not anything new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except that BitComet is a closed source windows only c++ application.

    2. Re:This is not anything new. by willdenniss · · Score: 1

      Azureus has been doing this as well. But, no tracker means you can't JOIN a swarm. This means that it will slowly die unles the tracker returns sometimes. I believe this change will eliminate this problem.

      Will.

    3. Re:This is not anything new. by Cramer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where "long time" is measured in days? It was only released a month or two ago (v0.56+ as I recall.) Azureus has had DHT in the CVS tree for many months now. Proir to the full release, there were only a few thousand running from CVS builds. Now there's nearly 100k and growing within the DHT tree.

      The way AZ is doing things, a tracker is not required at all. If you can find one peer, you'll be able to find the entire DHT tree. Btw, this is currently an azureus only thing -- you won't learn of any non-az clients this way.

    4. Re:This is not anything new. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      A fun side effect of not needing to talk to the tracker is that you don't need an account at the "exclusive" 0-Day type sites to download their releases.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    5. Re:This is not anything new. by izomiac · · Score: 1

      It's been a feature for as long as I've used BitComet. Looking at the [url=http://www.bitcomet.com/doc/changelog.txt]Old change log[/url] it looks like it was added in version 0.32, which came out September 8th, 2003. So I guess that would be a little over 600 days. I haven't read the article yet, but it sounds like Azureus implemented their own method instead of using BitComet's. Seems like it would be more effective if you had both clients sharing the same list instead of each client having its own...

    6. Re:This is not anything new. by Cramer · · Score: 1

      That document hasn't be updated for over a year now, btw.

      Adding the message protocol for sending peer lists between peers is a long way from a distributed hash table or any trackerless system. And it's not want got BC banned at a lot of sites recently.

    7. Re:This is not anything new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the two compatable with each other, though?

    8. Re:This is not anything new. by izomiac · · Score: 1

      The reason the document hasn't been updated is because it's the archived change log, since the feature has been in BitComet for so long.

      I wouldn't consider the peer list sharing far off from a trackerless system. Sometimes when I finish downloading something I'll disconnect from the swarm and start seeding to other computers on my router. If I still have an active internet connection then the peer list gets shared (even if I delete it from the seeding computer often another BitComet user from the original swarm will reconnect and restore it). Immediately after recieving the peer list the other computers will connect to people in the original swarm and start downloading the file from them as well. Even though it's undesirable in this case the download will proceed without even connecting to the original tracker, so I'm not sure how that's a "long way" from a trackerless system...

      Also, out of curiousity what's the exact reason BC got banned? Everyone I talk to (and explain the stupidity/futility of the ban) says that's the peer list sharing is the reason. In fact, someone made a "patch" that cripples BitComet by removing that exact feature.

    9. Re:This is not anything new. by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Also, out of curiousity what's the exact reason BC got banned? Everyone I talk to (and explain the stupidity/futility of the ban) says that's the peer list sharing is the reason. In fact, someone made a "patch" that cripples BitComet by removing that exact feature. I've tried to explain the same futility. It only half-way works for BitComet because the users don't have the source to easily change the peer_id. Yes, it's trivial to change for anyone with much of a clue, but that's certainly not the masses using BC.

      It was banned for distributing torrents via it's private communications. Or something like that. I don't use BC, so I don't know exactly what it was doing or what the "patch" turned off, but I do know it was a serious problem for some sites. It's probablly something like the magnet urls in azureus for dht hosted torrents. I've not dug into that either to see exactly where the torrent file is coming from. (but I do know how to turn it off from the torrent. too bad the tracker cannot notify the client -- and what idiot thought putting private in the info dictionary was a good idea? That changes the info_hash people.)

    10. Re:This is not anything new. by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Hmm... from that description it sounds like moderators of private sites got pissed because BitComet sorta merges swarms if someone is downloading from two or more. I.e. Site X and Site Y have the same torrent (just using different trackers), some clever BitComet user starts downloading it from X, adds Y to the tracker list, and now all BitComet users in either swarm are downloading from both. That'd make it very difficult to track the ratio of unoriginal content... Seems even sillier than I thought.

  13. Tor by natrius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It also looks like they integrated Tor into the client, which should lead to fairly interesting results. When a client as popular as Azureus has anonymity built in, I think some people might be angry.

    When the **AA see an IP address downloading from an infringing torrent, they direct their lawsuits towards the account holder for that IP. This puts people running Tor at risk of being sued. Is "It wasn't me, it was another Tor user" a valid defense? Are people going to be held accountable for the traffic that passes through their Tor server?

    1. Re:Tor by moonbender · · Score: 3, Informative
      Oh. The Tor guys won't like that. People figured out how to run BT over Tor a while ago (I tried it myself in January after seeing a presentation on Tor). Google for anonbt and you end up on a subsection of the Azureus homepage, saying:
      Please *DO NOT* use Tor for routing peer-to-peer data traffic, it can not handle the bandwidth. They have indicated that they will make efforts to ban such usage if it continues, which will likely affect both legitimate and unwanted use!
      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:Tor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually that is exactly what TOR is for. There is no way(except sophisticated traffic analysis) to prove what traffic is yours. This should stand up in court, as TOR just routes encrypted traffic. The EFF actually runs their own TOR onion router, and I wouldn't be surprised if they got involved in any sort of lawsuits involving TOR. Although, as soon as the dopes in Congress and the whitehouse understand this technology, and get lobbied by the RIAA, it may not be legal for long.

    3. Re:Tor by __aawfbm2023 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm sure the RIAA isn't going to be suing any major infrastructure providers in the near future, but one would wonder if Tor falls under the same category. Willingful ignorance isn't a very strong legal defence.

    4. Re:Tor by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 1

      Are people going to be held accountable for the traffic that passes through their Tor server?

      IANAL but I think we're back to the 'substantial non-infringing uses' arguement again. Unlike P2P software, Tor has wide ranging uses covering a multitude of applications and protocols. I doubt the RIAA can sucessfully bring it down.

      OTOH I doubt Tor can afford to defend itself unless the FSF comes to the rescue.

    5. Re:Tor by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 1

      bleah, I meant the EFF of course.

    6. Re:Tor by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Well, if someone borrows your gun and they use it to kill someone, you may be in trouble. If they borrow your gun *telling you* that they're going to kill someone, then do, you're almost certainly in trouble. Same goes for any crime - if you help someone, turn a blind eye, etc you may go down as an accessory or for aiding and abetting, etc.

      I'd imagine that the same thing applies here. If you run this sort of thing with the expectation that people will use it to violate copyright, you *may* be liable. Just shrugging and saying "who knew?!" may not be enough.

      [No, of course I'm not a lawyer]

    7. Re:Tor by jludwig · · Score: 1

      I actually emailed the EFF contact about the Tor issue, and was told that if one were to be held responsible for information passing thru your Tor client every anonymous proxy in the US would be shut down. We're not "common carriers" but you do need to draw the line somewhere... is your gateway responsible? ISP? School's proxy? All of those route your packets at various levels. The EFF obviously had their legal staff look into this before supporting Tor financially and decided its a non-issue, which actually surprised me.

      Jeff

    8. Re:Tor by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Considering how Tor (note the domain) is officially supported by the EFF, that does seem likely. However like I pointed out above, last I heard the Tor guys really don't want P2P on their network, saying that the network isn't able to sustain the bandwidth requirements - but I suppose that they want to avoid being connected with the filesharing scene in general.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    9. Re:Tor by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Ah! I was wondering what all those defaulted checked boxes for Tor and Onion in the config were. I guess I should unchecked them and anyone that looks like them? (The help/what's new could be improved too.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    10. Re:Tor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EFF is hardly a group of top lawyers like the ACLU -- more like a bunch of rich slashbots that choose to believe what they want to believe. TOR is supposed to be a slap against the RIAA/MPAA, and the EFF probably wouldn't mind the publicity and fundrasing potential from any sort of legal conflict.

    11. Re:Tor by Pastis · · Score: 1

      I have a similar problem. I have an open wireless router at home. The reason? I believe Internet access should be open to anyone. It takes 4 weeks to get your line established when you open move into an apartment, and the only way I found to get something usable in the meantime was to use my uncautious neighbour lines. As a result I decided to let my line open for those in need. Of course it can be misused.

      My friends are telling me I am playing too much with fire. I just want to be helpful. But if someone starts doing P2P on my line in an unoticeable way, I might get into trouble. Hard to prove it.

    12. Re:Tor by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 1

      I think its inevitable. Someone's going to come along and glue Tor and [insert p2p client] together and release it.

      As for bandwidth requirements, I'd hope whoever did this would be intelligent enough to realise the restrictions of the current Tor network and build their own Tor compatible net for their P2P clients or just use it for finding nodes.

      I agree that if Tor was used for bulk p2p data transfer it would quickly fold under the pressure. We've already seen that with Freenet.

    13. Re:Tor by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

      They obviously haven't used tor, which is generally painfully slow.

      Also the minimum packet size is 512 bytes, irritating.

      Tor is not for speed it is for enhanced (not perfect) anonymimootty. Yeah I can't spell that.

      --
      -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
  14. Google says... by Froe · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    BitTorrent is the... result of unscrupulous and corrupt people in the same way that radio frequencies can be.

    Google Talk

    1. Re:Google says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google gave me a far nerdier response:

      BitTorrent is the... best thing like ever for necro lol pretty much increases your mana pool by the tangleroot.

  15. Re:Runs.. by Tomfrh · · Score: 0, Troll

    You probably need the new Java files...

    Before I upgraded java, Azureas took like 95% CPU when doing nothing.

  16. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Why is that modded flamebait? A post with no vulgar language and a well though out allegory is flamebait? I think whoever got mod points needs learn how to think objectively.
    I can only imagine...
    "OMG, PEOPLE USE BITTORRENT TO PIRATE!1!1! LIES!!1! -1, FLAMEBAIT!!@!@U!(@"

    1. Re:What? by xtracto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Be realistic. Yeah, Bittorrent has plenty of legit uses. But do you really think that's what most people use it for? I'd say most are looking for porn, movies, software, etc. Look at it this way, guns can be used to hunt for food. But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people. You can argue about their legitimate use and bad rap 'till you're blue in the face, but the legitimate uses are statistically outweighed by bad ones. The same applies to Bittorrent.

      I agree with Parent, why do /. mods always mod down any p2p software critics? It is supposed to be an open forum! too bad I just used 5 mod points if not I would have modded up GP... INSIGHTFUL, maybe you do not like it but, it has some truth.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:What? by dAzED1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      maybe because of this line: "But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people"

      I'd have to venture a guess that 95% of gun use is against targets, 4.9% is against animals, and less than .1% is against people. I don't know where the hell you live, but whatever city it is - I promise the number of hunters in that area outnumber the number of people who shot a person in that same area by at least 100 to 1. Here at work with me (in NY, no less), about 1/4 of the people hunt. Not a single one of them has ever shot a person - oddly enough, having been in the military I am the one here that comes closest.

    3. Re:What? by dAzED1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      unless that city is Bagdad....not many animals around there, and lots of people shooting each other.

    4. Re:What? by Retric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the amount of led shot off in WWII is more than has ever used for hunting. But, in the US most people use guns to hit targets or animals and not people.

      As to target's I think more people shot at targets learning how to hit people than shoot at targets learning how to hit animals.

    5. Re:What? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      Again: "99% of gun use is against people" was the claim. I'm not going to argue statistics for a war that ended before my parents were even born...not in a discussion about what gun use "is" - a present-tense word.

      Additionally - having spent quite a lot of time at ranges, I have to emphatically disagree with your assessment on target practice. One doesn't learn how to hit people, one learns how to aim. Apply that aiming practice to shooting tires, birds, deer, people - whatever you like - but I've yet to hear of a range where the targets were live humans (though I have heard about animals).

    6. Re:What? by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A lot of peopld shoot at targets just for the fun of it, not really doing it to learn to shoot people or animals. Clay pigeons for example. A very large number of people participating in that sport do not hunt, and it certainly doesn't train you for defensive (or offensive) shooting against human targets, but people still do it and have fun nonetheless.

      Shooting can be FUN. Not violent. It's an activity that takes a lot of skill to do right. Learning windage adjustments. Learning the temperment of your weapon. Recording datasets and adjusting your loadings to shrink a target group. Bedding the action or recrowning a barrel. There is a lot of work to shooting accurately, and a lot of people enjoy that activity just as an activity, with no ulterior motive (no more than any basketball player, football player, or golfer has).

      That's where I think the gap exists. There's a large group of people out there that have the unwaivering belief that guns are out there only to kill people. Target practice? Oh yeah they're training to kill people. Hunting? Yeah they're just satisfying a violent streak. They'll break and kill people eventually. Self defense? They're just looking for an excuse to kill people.

      Despite so much evidence to the contrary you still have people with the severest case of tunnel-vision I've every seen.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    7. Re:What? by thedustbustr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The gun analogy is flamebait. *ducks troll mod*

      --
      This sig is false.
    8. Re:What? by mubar · · Score: 1

      Again: "99% of gun use is against people" was the claim. I'm not going to argue statistics for a war that ended before my parents were even born...not in a discussion about what gun use "is" - a present-tense word.

      Parent was using WWII just as an example. There are more than dozen wars going on right now around the world, and even more lesser conflicts, with thousands and thousands of people dying in them. The amount of gun use for hunting or stuff like that is small when compared to shooting humans, at present.

    9. Re:What? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      wrong. Thousands are dieing in wars, but hundreds of thousands of animals are getting shot.

      And both, combined, are blips compared to target practice.

    10. Re:What? by SlashSnot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ummm, yeah. 99 out of 100 rounds purchased at Walmart are used against people. Maybe 99/100 P2P downloads are less than pure, but you are so far from insightful it hurts.

    11. Re:What? by Mindwarp · · Score: 1

      ...Clay pigeons for example. A very large number of people participating in that sport do not hunt, and it certainly doesn't train you for defensive (or offensive) shooting against human targets

      Unless the human target is currently flying through the air in front of you, of course.

      --
      The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
    12. Re:What? by Retric · · Score: 0

      Look, I have hunted; hell most years people come to my parents place just to pick off a few dear but I said most people learn to hit people not animals. Now I know some people like to hit targets for the fun of it but everyone in the military, and police forces learn how to hit people. Add to that all the people who buy a hand gun for home protection and you start to see a lot of people who learn how to wound or kill other people but don't show up to shooting ranges much.

      Many people buy a handgun shoot off 2-3 clips and never come back. Now in your area most people might learn to hunt but where I grew up it was around 10-30% if that and this was farm country. Now most people live in cities and never go hunting so if there learning how to shoot it's to defend themselves.

      I think it would be a good idea if everyone over 21 would carry a handgun at all times. Ok not such a good idea when drinking but I think it would do more to stop crime than doubling our police force or building more jails. Think of this you go to rob a 7-11 and you KNOW everyone has a gun. Want to hijack a plain fin, but everyone has a gun ect ect.

      I say defend the idea that you can carry a gun at all times because it's a good idea not because you might want to hunt with your handgun sometime.

    13. Re:What? by Retric · · Score: 1

      Look up how much ammo was produced in WWII.

      Millions of people died but for each of those 10-100's of rounds where shot off. In hunting its 1-3 shots a kill but in war you use suppressor fire and take shots you think might hit someone. Look at how many plane's where shot down in WWII and think of the 1,000's of rounds that where fired to get that each kill.

      Hell, take Vietnam it might have been a small war as such things go but the amount of ammo shot off was just insane.

    14. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but I shoot at targets to shoot at targets. For some reason, I prefer soda cans.

    15. Re:What? by Fished · · Score: 1
      Me too. They make a very satisfying "plink" when you hit them. :) Also, I would challenge the ggp (or whatever) to explain why, if most gun use is to hit people, why airguns have become so outrageously popular among adults? Given that airguns are only used for target shooting ...
      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    16. Re:What? by rpdillon · · Score: 1

      True, though GP was insinutating that he meant *illegal* use against people, seeing how the analogy was to illegal use of peer to peer.

      So, while a LOT of gun use has been in wars against people, that doesn't rate as illegal.

      Either way, even though the statistic is BS, the underlying point is correct. I wish folks wouldn't reinforce good points with stats that *are* flamebait (after all, this isn't a discussion about gun control or use, but about peer to peer).

    17. Re:What? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      "everyone in the military, and police forces learn how to hit people"

      I guess you missed where I said I was in the military. Marines, 0311. Lemme know if you think I shot enough weapons for your tastes. When I signed up, I put 03 as my MOS of choice.

      You do NOT learn to shoot people. You learn to AIM. The one way (almost all) people are able to shoot another human being is to momentarily forget that they other person is, in fact, a human being. Once someone knows how to aim, they generally can keep that up without constant practice. Further practice is then for psychological reasons, not to learn to aim (or learning to do anything). Its so that if you have to shoot a person, you can pretend you're just shooting a target - because you've done that so often. You zone. If you don't detach yourself, you break. Only an insane person could handle learning how to shoot a *person*.

      But now you finally say what you mean - handguns. Yes, "handguns are made for killin, they ain't no good for nothin else" - to quote a little Skynard.

    18. Re:What? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      this isn't a semantics retort - when you shoot down a plane, you're shooting down a plane...not a person. It's actually preferable that the pilot lives (esp if injured). Kill an enemy, take out 1 opponent and harden the resolve of the rest. Wound an enemy, take out 3 opponents, and weaken the resolve of the rest.

    19. Re:What? by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Despite so much evidence to the contrary you still have people with the severest case of tunnel-vision I've every seen.

      I used to shoot targets for fun and I don't even own a gun nor I have permit to carry one. And, yes, it takes lot of skill. The only reason I stopped was that I have hearing problems and even with protectors my ears hurt. I've always suffered from tinnitus and decided to quit shooting just in case it was going to make my problem worse.

      I've been thinking of taking up archery. Oddly enough you don't see these people protesting against that and an arrow/bolt can be just as deadly as a bullet.

      Can anybody recommend a beginner's bow?

      --
      No sig
    20. Re:What? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Can anybody recommend a beginner's bow?



      It's been a while since I've really messed with it but a friend of mine who is very much into archery (whenever I shoot I always borrow one of hiw bows) always recommended that I get a PSE if I were to buy one of my own (he shoots one of the higher end Browning bows). Just make sure you get one setup with the proper pull length and weight for your size/strength.

      Sorry to hear about you giving up shooting. I'm sure that with a .22LR and ear muffs you could probably get by (it's hard to hear a .22 when I'm wearing muffs), but then again you have to deal with the guy next to you shooting a .454 Casull. :)
      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    21. Re:What? by karniv0re · · Score: 1

      Shooting can be FUN. Not violent.

      ...or, shooting can be fun AND violent! Kidding! I'm about as far left on the spectrum as possible and I agree. A gun is a tool. Same as a knife, a sword, an axe, a crossbow, TNT, etc. Though guns do go into a slightly different category because it makes it easer to kill without feeling like you actually killed, it's still left to the responsibility of the owner.

      I wish people would place more emphasis on responsibility instead of trying to ban things (and this extends far beyond guns).

    22. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'd have to venture a guess that 96.754% of villagers are Pro-Frankenstein. This means that approximately one out of every 500 people in New York are actually opposed to the idea of Swiss Cheese. Naturally, it follows that my dictionary has an unusually long definition for "Sulk" & "Mustard."

    23. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless that city is Bagdad....not many animals around there

      Lots of towelheads and US army personels. They both sure count as animals to me. And yes, they shoot at each other, which is unusual for game.

    24. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With any amount of insight, it should be obvious by now that pr0n and w4r3z are the main force driving the demand for bandwidth and other hardware.

      Whatever your stance on copyright issues and such, the fact of the matter is that the technological revolution that has put a PC in most any home in the so-called developed world COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED without piracy. What we call "p2p" today is just a relatively new way to do the same thing that has been going on since the floppy disk became standard.

      I used to swap floppies via snailmail, long before any normal person had a modem at home. Which was perfectly cool, since neither RIAA, MPAA, BSA or whathaveyounot were legally allowed to inspect mail. I used to get thick envelopes full of floppies from Iceland, Finland, Germany, England, Italy, all over the place. And sent full floppies back. Chock full of warez from such fine groups as Pompey Pirates, Automation, Bad Brew Crew and others. I'm sure there are representatives for the "I used to bang rocks together to get ones and zeroes"-crowd out there who are getting ready to jump in right now and claim to have been trading fortran code written with a quilt pen for making punchcard nudie pics decades ago, or whatever.

      Where would the PC be today without warez? Would 200GB hard-drives would be standard in workstations at this moment, if it weren't for good old warez? Would "Doom" have been a success if almost every kid on the planet with a computer had a pirate copy? Would people buy graphics cards twice the price of a standalone games console if they had to buy every title they wanted to play? Would the PC so completely dominate the computer games industry if it weren't for piracy? Would CD-burners ever have gotten into the home?

      I can't say. Probably not. What I do know is that digital piracy has had a significant impact and has made all of us "consumers" spend our money differently. We have for instance neglected to buy as many copies of Britney Spears' ".. baby one more time" as we did Michael Jackson's "Thriller". Which you can interpret together with estimated downloads on p2p networks and say "kids aren't buying music any more, they're downloading it for free instead". Or you can try to grep reality and see that most kids spend their money on a lot more things now than they did. There are more shiny objects of desire to aquire than yesterday. The stars are standing shoulder to shoulder where before there were only a few, and when a star fails to sell any records, a new one is there before you can say "overhyped musically insignificant crap". Not only music artists and cinema tickets and rentals are avaliable any more. DVDs, cell phone content, handheld games, computer games, console games, online games, and so on.

      I bet a good portion of the people who fail to show up at the screening of whatever "kung fu cop" movie is screening at the moment are at home watching something really good that they would have NEVER heard of were it not for piracy, like for instance this really good Thai martial arts/action movie which you would probably have never come across if I had not given you a tip: Ong-Bak.2003.DVDRip.XviD-VALiOMEDiA

      (if you're l33t you'll know how to find it, if you're n00b you'll have to make some friends who can teach you how to be l33t. An excellent way to make l33t friends is to host an FTP server with loads of disk on a fast static link.)

      The freedom of piracy means that people are able to experience the state of the art, even if they aren't aware of the product, can't afford it, can't find it, or maybe even are too stingy to buy. But so what, because through this sharing of data people are discerning the crap from the useful. People are recommending things to each other. Quality prevails in piracy, because it is natural selection. As people discover the new possibilities of various pieces of technology, they start to desire it. This sort marketing cannot be bought. For the companies that have good products at affordable prices and with good avaliability

    25. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more than dozen wars going on right now around the world, and even more lesser conflicts, with thousands and thousands of people dying in them. The amount of gun use for hunting or stuff like that is small when compared to shooting humans, at present.

      You obviously don't live in the South...thousands and thousands of deer, thousands and thousands of small mammals, thousands and thousands of ducks, doves, and turkeys...and that's just in my back yard.

      Seriously, any one hunter in my community kills more animals a year than the best soldier shoots in a lifetime.

    26. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but most humanoids that are capable of flight are also blessed with super-invulnerability, so the bullets can't harm them. Witness Superman, for example.

      Oh, you said humans, not humanoids. Well, the only humans I can think of that can fly are the ones that are using Windows XP. But are you really worried about their welfare in the face of gunfire? I'm not.

    27. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me a lot of those airguns are used against live targets, ie. humans.

    28. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shooting can be FUN. Not violent. It's an activity that takes a lot of skill to do right. Learning windage adjustments. Learning the temperment of your weapon.

      If shooting for you is a fun, non-violent activity, why do your refer to the gun you shoot with as a "weapon"? ;)

    29. Re:What? by bokutoe · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree with ya. Rather than being brought up to control ourselves and take personal responsibility for our actions, we're instead told that "it was that demon Rammstein music", or "he played too much Grand Theft Auto". But the simple fact is, it's easier to blame it on something else than to take personal responsibility. So as long as society continues to see that as acceptable (frivolous lawsuits anyone?) how can we expect that trend to change?

    30. Re:What? by hostyle · · Score: 1

      Yeah American terrorism is +3 funny. Oh, my mistake. If such an act is committed by the American military its no longer considered terrorism - merely "liberation", "installing democracy" or "anti-terrorism". ha ha. Does anyone else find it a little strange that the country with the largest ratio of guns to people on earth is also the country that has has its finger on the trigger of every major international political coup in living memory?

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    31. Re:What? by Altus · · Score: 1



      probably due to good safety training... as soon as you stop thinking of a gun as a weapon you become a lot more dangerous to the people around you.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    32. Re:What? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      For the same reason they mod those same posts up -- because moderators are simply normal slashdot users who visit the site for a certain amount of time, between those who never visit and those who compulsively do so. There are many many moderators at once, and they don't have to have the same opinions. Such posts they disagree with *are* flamebait in the sense that a flamewar will probably follow, which is why the moderation is similarly two-faced.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    33. Re:What? by issachar · · Score: 1
      It was modded flamebait because it's bringing up gun ownership. An interesting topic to be sure, but it's a red flag issue for many people. It's flamebait because it invites an argument over the right to bear arms which has nothing to do with the topic. There are other comparisons which don't invite straying off topic.

      Not all flamebait is rude and offensive. Well written flamebait starts the flamewar without using cheap tactics.

      It may not even be intended as flamebait. Maybe unintended troll would be a good classification. Forget about the slashdot moderation system anyway. It's useless. Same with that whole friends-foes thing...

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    34. Re:What? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      lol, do you know what is funny?? at the end, the original post ended with a +5 Insightful =o)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    35. Re:What? by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      But I think another part of the argument can go: "Why can't you find some passtime that uses something that isn't designed to kill?"

      I'm sure shooting can be fun and rewarding etc. But the issue is that you're using and encouraging use of deadly weapons.

      I dunno... it just seems to me that there are passtimes that can be enjoyed that don't involve deadly weapons

    36. Re:What? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1
      I dunno...it just seems to me that there are passtimes that can be enjoyed that don't involve deadly weapons.


      There are, and if you wish to partake in them, feel free. That's the thing though, we (are supposed to) live in a FREE country. I've never hurt anyone with my guns (and I own 17 of them); I observe all applicable safety rules and pose a threat to no one. Anyone who tells me I'm doing wrong based on some pre-concieved notion that A PIECE OF METAL has an agenda can take a hike. It doesn't matter what something is designed for; it matters how it's used.



      And yes I encourage the use of deadly weapons. I think that the more people who are familiar with guns the better. Not only for an enjoyment standpoint, but if more people were familiar with them (ESPECIALLY youngsters) you'd see far fewer accidents. I'd be all in favor of allowing one-time tax deduction of up to $1000 for the purchase of a gun by anyone legally able to do so.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    37. Re:What? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      you know...I have to agree with you. I didn't actually intend for that to come off as funny...was just excluding it from the list of cities where hunters outnumber people shooting people by 100 to 1.

    38. Re:What? by Retric · · Score: 1

      Kill an enemy, take out 1 opponent and harden the resolve of the rest. Wound an enemy, take out 3 opponents, and weaken the resolve of the rest.

      I understand the idea behind this but think in modern warfare this is an overstated idea. The goal of war is to neutralize the enemy's ability / willingness to make war. Now having a large number of wounded pilots is a detrimental, but removing most / all skilled pilots is probably more detrimental. In many cases it's a lot easer to make a new plane than to train a new pilot. So having many countries would trade 50% wounded pilots in order to keep 50% fully trained pilots.

      I think we can agree that over the last 100 years war has been an important factor to the US's and the worlds manufacture of firearms and ammo. Granted, inside the US more ammo is probably used for target practice than hunting and more for hunting animals than people, but trying to call most guns benign is overstating that idea.

      PS: Ok for your average foot solder blowing off a leg is more detrimental than out right killing him in most cases but when it comes to highly trained people like fighter pilots or engineers 3 months in rehab and then back into the fight or back training there replacements is not really such a great idea.

    39. Re:What? by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      And yes I encourage the use of deadly weapons. I think that the more people who are familiar with guns the better. Not only for an enjoyment standpoint, but if more people were familiar with them (ESPECIALLY youngsters) you'd see far fewer accidents. I'd be all in favor of allowing one-time tax deduction of up to $1000 for the purchase of a gun by anyone legally able to do so.

      And right there I see you're someone (well, that and your 17 guns) who can never be reasoned with when it comes to firearms. I'm very happy to live in Australia where those who have even shot a firearm are in the minority... we seem to have FAR, FAR fewer deaths per head by firearms... or actually murders full stop actually.

    40. Re:What? by Fished · · Score: 1
      Seems to me a lot of those airguns are used against live targets, ie. humans.
      Seems to me you must have no idea what an airgun is or what you're talking about. Why would one bother to shoot a human with an airgun? It MIGHT pierce the skin. barely. It certainly wouldn't maim or kill.
      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  17. Bitcomet problem? by forand · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the same feature that has been getting Bitcomet clients banned from various trackers?

  18. Why? Because "the spice must flow" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Or more appropriately: warez must flow.

  19. Java 1.5 by mattr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You MUST install java 1.5 on linux.

    1. Re:Java 1.5 by mrsev · · Score: 1

      No I refuse I want to run M$ Virtual Machine instead.

    2. Re:Java 1.5 by lewiz · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean that I must have 1.5 to run Azureus. Well, that's not true, I've got the new version running quite happily with 1.4.2. They do recommend 1.5 for improved stability and performance, however.

    3. Re:Java 1.5 by mattr · · Score: 1

      Good luck, i had 1.4 and stopped working

    4. Re:Java 1.5 by spinkham · · Score: 1

      I am also using 1.4.2 on Linux, 1_4_2_08 to be exact.. Works well for me.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
  20. Not only BitComet but CometCursor too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been having some weird trouble with CometCursor too and I was told it was da bomb.

  21. Perfect for reviewers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is perfect for those times when you want to pirate software and write "in depth" reviews about it.

    1. Re:Perfect for reviewers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proud to be NARC? Regardless of what they're doing. I wouldn't go make the rounds "Hey look at me, I'm a big tattletale. If I see you slacking off I'm gonna go tell the boss and hopefully you'll get fired." Depending on the seriousness of the narcing, it can result in being shot and/or killed. Not that you're in any danger of it. But I think you're an ass, even if you're clever to figure out whatever. Why don't you go sponsor a child in a 3rd world country or something instead of trying to get everyone in trouble? Who knows, maybe someone will plant drugs on your property and call the police on you?

  22. JPC by Dakisha · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was also interested to see they included 'Joltid Peer Cache (JPC)' - in their words "Joltid Peer Cache (JPC) is now integrated into Azureus. For users whose ISP support this, JPC should allow faster downloads, while helping the ISP reduce its bandwidth costs. The JPC Plugin is safe in the way that your ISP won't know what you are downloading, and can't use it to spy on you."

    Given that torrents are supposed to account from anywhere between 30-70% of all internet traffic, depending on who you believe - this could go a long way towards easing bandwidth consumption issues. Of course, I have no idea how many ISPs are actually using this, the website http://www.joltid.com/index.php/peercache/ is rather limited in it's information, and a google for the name reveals that there is still some question over the legality, so a lot of ISPs are keeping their heads down and using it on the quiet.

    For flash traffic, such as a new game demo being released - or even torrented anime, which often sees in excess of 10-20 thousand people downloading it within 48 hours for the more popular series, this could save ISPs a lot of money.

    1. Re:JPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The percentage of internet traffic statistics are always useless, every report that bothers to state them sets up parameters for finding them are totally impractical, like the guy who was wondering how much IRC traffic was illegal and came up with some figure like 99.7% of all IRC traffic. When you look at his parameters though they were absurd, everytime the word Windows, Adobe, all the major game titles and such, were mentioned that meant the files and channels were illegal - which included everyone using Microsoft IRC (mIRC) as their client, and all the help channels out there. Definitely IRC is a haven for warez, but 99.7% was purely a shock value and I'm sure he knew that when he set his standards. The same is true for all of them, they all state numbers, and find their numbers based on parameters, and all the sets of the parameters are horribly flawed. 30-70% of all internet traffic is Bittorrent, 50-80% of it is spam mail, 110-150% of it is pornography. The list goes on and on and none of it's true, because as I'm sure you see it doesn't add up and never will. Measuring the internet is like measuring the grains of sand on a beach with your naked eye, it doesn't matter if you have eagle vision your still making an uneducated guess at best, L x W x H does not apply.

    2. Re:JPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For flash traffic, such as a new game demo being released - or even torrented anime, which often sees in excess of 10-20 thousand people downloading it within 48 hours for the more popular series, this could save ISPs a lot of money.

      Normal HTTP has had this for over a decade. Set an appropriate Expires header, ensure you aren't sending Cache-Control or Pragma headers to disable caching, and your content can be cached at the ISP. If it's something that is popular/large enough to cause significant cost to the ISP, then it will be popular/large enough to be stored in their HTTP caches.

      If web developers are lazy enough to leave their servers misconfigured (and many are), then they aren't going to bother setting up some new form of cache either.

    3. Re:JPC by Dakisha · · Score: 2

      Indeed - but a lot of people are now distributing these files via bittorent instead, thus current caching systems get bypassed.

      This just allows torrents, which supposedly account for much more bw than http - to also get cached. This has nothing to do with lazy web developers, etc. I think you missed the point :)

    4. Re:JPC by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Before the MPAA and RIAA get their pants soiled... this is no different than an number of web caching systems that have been around for years. And for that matter, there already are some p2p caching systems around -- they work by intercepting traffic and thus don't require any "support" from the client.

      As for the claims of "can't use it to spy on you"... that is just so laughable. They're your ISP; they can watch every damned thing you do. (I know, because I have.)

  23. Newbs can't download or install anything by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2, Funny
    That's why Gentoo prompted me with an url where i should download it (manually). Even for newbies this should be doable.

    You obviously have neither parents nor an Uncle Bob who "knows computers" but who is always ringing you up for advise.

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Newbs can't download or install anything by willdenniss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You obviously have neither parents nor an Uncle Bob who "knows computers" but who is always ringing you up for advise.

      I do, several.

      None however run Linux, (nor use bittorrent). With OS X, Java is already there. With Windows it is really simple to install. Will.

    2. Re:Newbs can't download or install anything by richieb · · Score: 1
      You obviously have neither parents nor an Uncle Bob who "knows computers" but who is always ringing you up for advise.

      Do your parents or Uncle Bob really need BitTorrent? :)

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    3. Re:Newbs can't download or install anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're slightly OT here, but anyway:

      You obviously have neither parents nor an Uncle Bob who "knows computers" but who is always ringing you up for advise.

      If your parents want an easy-to-use-and-update-OS, they shouldn't be running Linux on desktop in the first place.

      The problems with e.g. Java are real, and clearly show that Linux isn't ready for desktop, no matter what the hordes of zealots say.

      I dual boot to Mepis, and since I really like it, I tried to get my mother to use it when she had her computer upgraded a few months back. The start was promising but after a few days it became clear that she just couldn't handle it herself, and she only browses the net and uses Word/Excel (OO). Needless to say, I was rather disappointed.

    4. Re:Newbs can't download or install anything by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      I do. And i strongly advise them *not* to use Linux, for just this reason :)

      I always say "how good are you with using MS-DOS?". If the answer is anything like "What's DOS?" or "Not really", i tell them to stick to windows. Saves both them and me a lot of frustration.

    5. Re:Newbs can't download or install anything by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Install issues at this point are the problem of the company, not of the OS. debian or urpmi are both more than enough to install java in a heartbeat, along with anything else you want.

      That said, I just switched back to XP from Debian because there are *actual* problems with linux regarding it's relative inability to support the legacy of win32.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  24. eXeem by aleatory_story · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I heard about eXeem a while back when SuprNova disbanded... the creator's next project or something. I also heard that it was being backed by spyware companies... so I haven't jumped to try it out. Could someone who has tried out eXeem give their thoughts about it?

    --
    Whatever you may be sure of, be sure of this: that you are dreadfully like other people. - James Russell Lowell
    1. Re:eXeem by BlueCup · · Score: 1

      I tried it when it first came out, so I have no idea if there is a newer version... but it was nothing special... not very fast (downloading, and system resource wise) not enough files, and not enough sources for the files... overall, crappy.

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    2. Re:eXeem by DjDanny · · Score: 1

      I have used it on and off for the past month or two and basically it's rubbish. It's got more dodgy files on it than Kazaa has, although the fact that people can 'rate' files and comment on them means you don't end up downloading them that often.
      However, download speeds are just so slow, it's not worth the effort.

      My advice is just to BUY the DVD you were going to rip off. That has the extra advantage of being legal.

      Or if it's just short porn AVIs you're after, then it's great!

    3. Re:eXeem by theArtificial · · Score: 0

      "It Stinks!" However there is an eXeem lite that has the spyware stripped out of it.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
  25. Great! by ardor · · Score: 1, Funny

    Where can I get a torrent to download this?

    --
    This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    1. Re:Great! by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

      Here
      The link is from the Azureus site.

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    2. Re:Great! by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      Two posters have already given this information and the slap in the face to the moderator who called this 'funny'. All the same, though, after my client automatically updated itself to this stuff via torrent (which I thought was pretty neat), it tried to download platform-specific support and plug-ins in two seperate further torrents and this is failing. Anyone else have same?

    3. Re:Great! by bairy · · Score: 1

      Yeah it tried to give me the plugins too. I don't know if they succeeded because I took azu off and downloaded + installed the exe which seemed to have them included. (I did that cos azu couldn't connect to anything (though could read trackers), I later found out it was out of data java at fault, but didn't realise that at the time).

      --


      Get paid to search..It's geniune and
  26. Re:Distributed Bloat by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

    I'll take this troll, gentlemen.

    I run azurus with a P3 500 w/ 168 MB RAM. I use it for lots of other thigngs too. I notice when it sucks up bandwith, but not resources.

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  27. Completely different market by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BT is not anonymous, nor are these attempts at decentralizing BT. They are simply a match-making service pairing off peers. Ants (and Freenet+++) try to create an anonymous network, which means acting as data proxies.

    That means
    a) helluva lot more complexity in terms of making it work
    b) lots of complexity in making it actually anonymous
    c) massive loss of bandwidth due to proxying data around

    Judging by the website:
    "NOTE: The only way to speed up the ANts connection system is to let the net grow. Only with a reasonable number of high speed peers (i.e. peers that handles up to 30 connections) properly configured (firewall, ip etc.) initial connection can be easy and fast. So don't care about connection speed by now... let your node run and it will find peers or they will find it! DON't ASK TOO MUCH TO A NET MADE UP OF 20/30 peers..."

    I call shenanigans. The demand will scale with the supply, in fact you start running into MORE problems with finding content on a large network, not less. See Freenet. Oh, and I hope the actual number of nodes is higher. With that few, you can map out the entire network and analyze it apart almost no matter how brilliant the software is...

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Completely different market by ajs · · Score: 1

      "The demand will scale with the supply, in fact you start running into MORE problems with finding content on a large network, not less."

      In THEORY, this is incorrect. I say "in theory" because I don't know this protocol or implementation.

      However, the central idea in distributed, anonymous filesharing is to replicate most the bits that are most commonly requested. That is, if you proxy something for someone and 10 other people ask you for it, you leave it lying around. If you proxy somthing once and no one mentions it again, you drop it in favor of other proxied data.

      When a network scales up to sufficient size, this SHOULD result in acceptable scaling of popular data, while at least preserving access to less popular data.

    2. Re:Completely different market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BT is not anonymous, nor are these attempts at decentralizing BT.

      Its funny you should mention that couse this new azureus release also has a couple of extra configutation tickboxes (server ->networks):

      • The public network (not anonymous)
      • I2P network
      • The Onion Router (TOR) Network
      • Prompt for selection when a download with an anonymous tracker (?) is added

      However, none of this matters if you combine it with the JPC plugin. It basicly asks your provider (or whoever provides your DNS name resolution) if they have/want a copy of the file you are downloading/sharing. If they do you can download from there thus saving your provider a huge upstream bandwith bill through caching. Wasn`t bittorent around two thirds of the internet traffic by now? The bandwith saving would be huge, and this is one of the biggest costs ISP`s have. Its the idea the original Kazaa people tried to get rich of after they sold Kazaa to some australians. They retained the right to the kazaa protocol. They call their implementation peercache

      I imagene telling you provider what you are downloading is *not* what you want if you are with one of those big American providers ratting their customers to the ??aa. Ofcourse if you are with an ISP that dutifully forwards ??aa hatemail but doesn`t reveal your name then you are off a little better. You just might get huge speed improvements and they might pass the saving on to... whoever makes the money. Or they might keep the money for when the ??aa comes knocking on their door about the terabytes of files they are caching/"hosting" for their customers.

    3. Re:Completely different market by Kjella · · Score: 1

      "The demand will scale with the supply, in fact you start running into MORE problems with finding content on a large network, not less."

      In THEORY, this is incorrect. I say "in theory" because I don't know this protocol or implementation.


      Well, in every implementation I've seen to date, the average path length goes up as the network grows. Data are being proxied around more, reliability is less (as each node that drops out will break more paths). Bandwidth goes down.

      You are right that with sufficient nodes, the availability should improve, but I don't know any network that has anywhere near that capacity today.

      A full newsgroup feed is >1TB/day. Let us be kind enough to say there's 100TB of content total. Let's also be kind to say each piece of data is located 10 times on the network (also a low estimate for a network of that size). You're now looking at 1PB.

      The result is that the turn-over is so fast, there's no persistance. There's a post, a rush, and then the item is dead. Then you have a bunch of people stuck on 0-100% somewhere, pounding the network for data that isn't there or pieces for a file they'll never finish (as by the time a repost comes, they have deleted the partial and moved on). It takes a network of considerable size before that effect becomes anything worth talking about.

      Oh and by the way, that is also one of the greatest problems with creating an anonymous network. The client will pound and pound trying to get a piece of a file that isn't there, announcing loud and clear what they're trying to download. Most implementations I've seen flat out break any pretense of anonymity that way.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  28. Haven't updated the OSX port. by minshrine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Was looking foward to using as as soon as i heard they updated.But looks like the OSX port is not avalible yet.Must be working a version that is compatible with Tiger.

    1. Re:Haven't updated the OSX port. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It runs under java, so I thought that OS porting wasn't a problem...

    2. Re:Haven't updated the OSX port. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless your OS vendor is 6 months late shipping Java 1.5.

    3. Re:Haven't updated the OSX port. by Porkbreath · · Score: 1

      Yes it is. I'm running it right now.

    4. Re:Haven't updated the OSX port. by Quixote · · Score: 1

      It's a Java client. Isn't Java supposed to "write once, run anywhere" ? (I'm not being a troll here; just wondering).

    5. Re:Haven't updated the OSX port. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, suddenly, it isn't the software developer's fault, but the fault of your choice of OS (or the guys at Sun). So don't lay the blame on the guys coding Azereus for not "porting it."

    6. Re:Haven't updated the OSX port. by theArtificial · · Score: 0

      The FreeBSD port took awhile to come out (not the newer one, but 2.1.0?) due to some linux framework (eclipse?) that had to be ported, that and memory leaks. It has been a slow and difficult beast ;)

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    7. Re:Haven't updated the OSX port. by legrimpeur · · Score: 1

      well you can just download the jar files and put it in the Azureus app directory in the right place, or better exploit the autoupdate feature of Azureus. It just works! I am using it right now in Tiger with the preview release of Java 1.5 cheers

    8. Re:Haven't updated the OSX port. by destuxor · · Score: 1

      Yes, and in general Java is great for writing an application once and making only a few changes to move it to a different platform. Think OpenOffice - it runs on about anything very nicely.
      I don't know what's going on in this case, but I'd bet they're just testing it on Tiger to make sure Apple hasn't changed anything. But judging from a couple posts up it sounds like there aren't any problems so if they're wise they'll say Tiger is officially supported in a few days.
      Azureus isn't 100% Java. Neither is OpenOffice. That's why these programs have to be tested before they're ported on other platforms. If they really were 100% Java there shouldn't be any problems (provided you're running the appropriate JRE, which in almost every case means Sun 1.4.2).

  29. Re:you deserve a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You dumb fuck. Arse is UK English, not everyone speaks American English.

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ars e

  30. A legal torrent/torrent site that I'd like to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really wish there was a torrent for MD5 rainbow tables somewhere, totally legal and totally useful. I don't need to steal movies or games, as I have a job and only need to work a couple of hours, but rainbow tables take MONTHS if not years to make!

  31. Looks like a useful set of improvements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, search for decentralised trackers might be convenient; but it would probably make it rather easier for everyone(read *IAA) to find all the good stuff rather quickly. Without search we've got a formidable tool; bittorrent efficiency added onto the standard "I know a guy who knows a guy" search method of the good old social darknet.

  32. Breaking file share ratios at private sites by shyampandit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This tech should be very useful on the public trackers (no registration required) as the torrents will continue to work even when the tracker is offline.

    But what about the sites where a ratio is enforced so people seed and not just leech? This might break it as the clients might not talk to the main tracker anymore.

    Is it even possible to enforce share ratios with distributed tracking?

    1. Re:Breaking file share ratios at private sites by izomiac · · Score: 2, Informative

      AFAIK the client still will still report its stats to the tracker. The only way this could be exploited is if people just stopped connecting to the tracker all together. Some sites are banning BitComet for this reason (since you can connect then manually change the tracker address to something invalid). Kinda pointless though, changing a useragent is simple, and if you want to leech then there are various clients that are better at it/falsify ratios.

    2. Re:Breaking file share ratios at private sites by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Probably not. If people would leave the torrents open, and let others get stats from them about who uploaded what to them then maybe. But then you would never really be able to close/stop a torrent.

    3. Re:Breaking file share ratios at private sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question is this: why don't people share as much, or almost as much as they can? I get legal things off Bittorrent, like the latest Linux distros, game demos, etc., and I'm pretty much always downloading more than uploading (with the exception being the Linux, especially if it's been out awhile and has several seeds).

    4. Re:Breaking file share ratios at private sites by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      There's an option to make torrents private. At least, undering sharing in the azureus options. Private trackers will need to start using that.

  33. Lack of search will not negate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lack of search will not negate the effect this will have on Azureus. Such a search can easily be provided by a third-party website.

    Gentlemen, we now have Suprnova.org without the .torrent hosting issues. All your warez are belong to us!

  34. Other decentralised projects.. by the+new+supergod · · Score: 1

    I have been following anatomic which seems to be a similar project, but uses gnutella as the supernode, and a modified BitTornado client. Looks like Azureus is much more mature though.

  35. How is eMule... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    As far as 'warezing' is concerned (99% of traffic), BT is a terrible protocol. The trouble is, these kids see the speed of BT and think thats the way to go. They realise the centralisation is a problem, and so try to fix that. Without realising they are just reinventing the wheel. They think they are going to get the best of both worlds, because they are just warezing kids and don't know any better.

    How is eMule any better? It certainly doesn't protect your anonymity. The eMule server acts in much the same role as the BT server, except the speeds are better on BT. Remove the tracker, and you got a "flash mob" of peers. Each dumpsite could just point to one member of the swarm, making it ten or a hundred targets instead of one lone tracker. BT has always been about security in numbers, except the users have been many and the sites many, but the tracker only one. How do you stop a hundred sites giving a hundred leads to a swarm of thousands of users? You simply don't.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:How is eMule... by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      >> How is eMule any better?
      Read parent

      >> It certainly doesn't protect your anonymity.
      Nor does a de-centralised bittorrent

      >> The eMule server acts in much the same role as the BT server
      If you decentralise it, it sure does, that was the point of the parent.

      >> Except the speeds are better on BT
      Only on the centralised server, quote from parent: "Before you say 'wah wah bit torrent is faster', etc, it is only like that because it is centralised and so a tracker can make sure everyone is seeding"

      >> BT has always been about security in numbers, except the users have been many and the sites many, but the tracker only one
      Thats meaningless except for if you de-centralise the tracker, you get an inefficient version of the edonkey or kademlia networks. And it doesnt matter how many sites give the links, they will all be closed, sharereactor, shareconnector and other edonkey sites never ran a server or tracker or whatever you think they ran.

    2. Re:How is eMule... by shird · · Score: 1

      How is eMule any better? It certainly doesn't protect your anonymity. The eMule server acts in much the same role as the BT server, except the speeds are better on BT. Remove the tracker, and you got a "flash mob" of peers. Each dumpsite could just point to one member of the swarm, making it ten or a hundred targets instead of one lone tracker. BT has always been about security in numbers, except the users have been many and the sites many, but the tracker only one.

      eMule eliminates this need for a 'dumpsite', it also has support for 'flash mobbing' or swarming. Basically, each peer is the tracker. The need for a 'dumpsite' is the biggest problem with BT as far as warezing is concerned - it is the weak point in the chain, and makes it more difficult for anyone to upload content.

      For everything they are trying to do, it can just as easily be achieved by starting a seperate eDonkey network which limits the number of files you can share. But, 'oh no, what about people that connect to servers which allow more files' etc. This is going to be a problem with any p2p app, as bandwidth is shared between networks as hybrid clients emerge.

      Basicaly, they don't realise it, but they are coming full circle, and the outcome is just going to be a another eDonkey network. Which means, why not just use the existing one.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    3. Re:How is eMule... by InvalidError · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Basicaly, they don't realise it, but they are coming full circle, and the outcome is just going to be a another eDonkey network. Which means, why not just use the existing one.

      Here goes one reason: 9500KB pieces
      Another: MD5-class hashes

      The eD2k network uses oversized basic blocks and weak reference block hashes. Wasting up to 9.28MB because someone sent a bad bit is somewhat wasteful. So far, I have yet to see a torrent with >1MB pieces. Since MD5 is EOL, it is very likely that undetectable corruption exploits will appear in the near future (ViralG?). Killing legacy eD2k would be a good thing - those oversized blocks need to go, hopefully to be replaced by a scalable recursive tree hash.

    4. Re:How is eMule... by Hast · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because eDonkey sucks?

      Seriously every time I have tried to use that network I have quit the download after a day or so of waiting in queues. This is before getting anything at all of the file. It sould be faster to just go down to Germany or whatever by car and copy the file to a CDR and go back.

      I know I'm supposed to be online for a while before the eDonkey style queues start working in my favour; but I just can't be bothered.

      Also note that BT isn't like a typical P2P as you can't really search for files. This is in fact a "good thing" as it protects you from " Nbr_of_files * Loads_of_cash = You_are_bancrupt" type lawsuits.

      AFAIK RSS+Bittorrent type functions aren't available in other networks. (Not that it'd be impossible to add; but it's quite natural in BT.)

      All that said, networks like eDonkey, DC et al certainly have their uses. So does BT (even if they add some distributed functionality to it).

    5. Re:How is eMule... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eDonkey has a lot of queues because it's got assloads of content, both new/popular and old/unpopular and fake and so on.

      A new edonkey-like net might seem faster at first because all the users are downloading the same recent hollywood movies. But leave the net running for a few years and it will end up looking just like edonk.

    6. Re:How is eMule... by shird · · Score: 1

      Basically what Im saying is there is x amount of bandwidth to go around, regardless of the network.

      If you start using networks and protocols which don't encourage seeding (ie trackerless, decentralised etc), it really doesnt matter what you use, they would all end up basically like ed2k. A bunch of clients sharing x content, with y bandwidth, all trying to take as much as they can without giving anything in return. The overhead of emule isnt that huge, and given the size of files being transferred these days, using a more efficent protocol isn't going to buy you much, it just ends up segregating the network.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    7. Re:How is eMule... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If you start using networks and protocols which don't encourage seeding (ie trackerless, decentralised etc), it really doesnt matter what you use, they would all end up basically like ed2k. A bunch of clients sharing x content, with y bandwidth, all trying to take as much as they can without giving anything in return.

      AFAIK the tracker has nothing to do with encouraging seeding; the tracker just keeps track of who is downloading a file, and keeps that data to anyone who connects to the tracker (and memorizes that one's adress as well).

      BitTorrent clients prioritize requests from peers that are uploading to them higher than other peers. That's why it is in everyone's own best interest to upload to as many people as possible, as fast as possible. Or so I've understood from descriptions of BitTorrent.

      Anyway, if I were to implement a protocol like that, I'd simply cap uploads to any peer a bit faster that they're currently uploading to me. That way, the speed of two peers uploading to each other would increase as long as both have more bandwith available, and a peer that's not sharing data would get the shaft.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    8. Re:How is eMule... by FirstContact · · Score: 1
      Anyway, if I were to implement a protocol like that, I'd simply cap uploads to any peer a bit faster that they're currently uploading to me. That way, the speed of two peers uploading to each other would increase as long as both have more bandwith available, and a peer that's not sharing data would get the shaft.
      If you upload nothing to people who are also uploading nothing to you, then hardly anyone would be able to download a file via bittorrent, since every peer starts off having 0 parts of a file, except for the seeder(s). Also, seeders can't always be the ones to give the initial few chunks of a file to every single peer on a torrent where there are a a lot more peers compared to the number of seeders (like over 1000 peers with a single seeder on a new torrent release of something).
    9. Re:How is eMule... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1
      Each dumpsite could just point to one member of the swarm, making it ten or a hundred targets instead of one lone tracker.

      Better than that: It could just provide a magnet link. Presto, az goes out and finds one member of the swarm, downloads the .torrent from it, finds other peers via the DHT, and downloads the file. Not to mention magnet links are plenty short enough to post to eg usenet - let google do your torrent search for you! Now we just need an alt. newsgroup for them. Or perhapt post them on bitzi...
    10. Re:How is eMule... by paranoia2k · · Score: 1

      AFAIK the tracker has nothing to do with encouraging seeding; the tracker just keeps track of who is downloading a file, and keeps that data to anyone who connects to the tracker (and memorizes that one's adress as well).

      While this may be true for many tracker sites, but there are also numerous sites (usually requiring some sort of signup) that use the tracker to track UL/DL ratios. Some of these will give extra privilages to people with good ratios, while some take things a step further and actively limit users that are leeching excessively. This is particularly effective when aren't a huge number of high-speed seeders as it keeps the overall UL/DL ratios more in balance.

    11. Re:How is eMule... by krelian · · Score: 1

      And this is where we return to the good and old BBS methods of yore. At least this way you know that you are rewarded for that uploading.

    12. Re:How is eMule... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      A new edonkey-like net might seem faster at first because all the users are downloading the same recent hollywood movies. But leave the net running for a few years and it will end up looking just like edonk.

      Years back I used to use a private edonkey network, with releases mentioned on a webpage. There'd be as many seeds and downloaders for a new file as for a lot of what I download with bittorrent now. Even then, with the situation at its absolute best, I was only getting about 50% of bittorrent speed. It's quite possible there might be some underlying reason for it that was jinxing me, but hey, those are my experiences and I'm going to base my opinion on them.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    13. Re:How is eMule... by m50d · · Score: 1

      I think he wants it to increase, so there's a simple way to do that. Upload is capped at 2x the download you get from the same peer. You proxy stuff they're uploading if there's no file you actually want to get from them. When requesting a file you simply upload a few blocks of something popular to get it started - it doesn't need to be something they need, it just needs to show that you're willing to upload. Going more sophisticated, you could have a credit system for uploading based on digital signatures. You send a signature every time you receive a block, saying who you received it from. Not sending signatures gets a big mark against you from the person who sent you the block. Sending too many signatures shows you as downloading far more than you upload, so people no longer upload to you. I think it should be possible to arrange for such signatures to propagate over a gnutella-like network, gaining the advantages of bittorrent's enforced share ratios without the necessity of centralisation.

      --
      I am trolling
    14. Re:How is eMule... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why is that? Because with BitTorrent, your client gets all every chunk's location right from the server. In a eDonkey or "decentralized BitTorrent", you spend your bandwidth broadcasting to your peers.

    15. Re:How is eMule... by Hast · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you understand how BT works. Or it may just be that I can't quite interpret what you mean.

      It is true that when you connect to a BT swarm the tracker will inform you of the other clients currently active. Doing this is quite trivial though, even if it is decentralized.

      If you spend 50% of your traffic sending keep-alives then you need to redesign you protocol. (Or rather, design it at all.)

  36. Re:Bittorrent killed Enterprise! by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

    How do you propose that how much broadcast television watching (other than for Nielsen families or TiVo users) was to be "tracked?"

    --
    I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  37. Replacement of sites... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this and compatible clients be the replacement to SuprNova and Lokitorrents, or does the lack of search negate its effectiveness?

    The quote above is a bit strange, the decentralised database is totally different from dump sites like SN/LT (now replaced by mininova). However, it's an nice alternative for the BT trackers (which often suffer downtime etc). You still need to get the torrent file from a dump site to start downloading.

    So in short: dump sites will stay, trackers will probably become less important.

  38. I don't understand... by Cereal+Box · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait a minute, I thought Bittorrent was OVERWHELMINGLY used for legitimate purposes, with only a small percentage of users having the audacity to (gasp) break copyright law (if you're to believe what's said on Slashdot).

    Why the need for decentralized trackers? I don't get it! Bittorrent is supposed to be a haven for law-abiding citizens to trade Linux ISOs and Project Gutenberg text files.

    1. Re:I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because if you decentralize the tracker you remove a sincle point of failure thus make the system that distributes ISO far more reliable.

    2. Re:I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't this implementation make it is even easier for the RIAA and friends to find violations?

      They just connect to the swarm and now they get the IP of everyone currently downloading. As I understand it the tracker just dishes out a few IPs at a time.

    3. Re:I don't understand... by m50d · · Score: 1

      It's apparently so much faster (I never find BT downloads any better than gnutella or fasttrack, but apparently it's very fast) that all the copyright infringers now want to use it.

      --
      I am trolling
  39. Hide the senders IP address. by caluml · · Score: 1

    Nice work, but the thing that needs to be worked on is hiding the users IP addresses. How abuot bouncing ICMP packets with the data in the payload from hosts with the return address set to the recipient, and the source address set randomly? That way no-one knows the senders IP. You'd need some kind of out of band broadcast system for asking for files too.

    1. Re:Hide the senders IP address. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most ISPs reject spoofed source addresses, so that wouldn't work too well.

    2. Re:Hide the senders IP address. by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      Was the subway picture taken at 4am? The station looks too clean, and too empty.

      BTW, which station is that. I recall being there, but do not remember it. My guess it is on the loop track, but my memory is failing me.

      --
      badness 10000
    3. Re:Hide the senders IP address. by caluml · · Score: 1

      But you could probably spoof it from your ISPs range?

    4. Re:Hide the senders IP address. by caluml · · Score: 1

      I can't remember the name of the station. It was a new one. I think I'm going to have to email Yurik, and ask him.
      Yes, it was about 5 minutes before it closed - but it's so amazingly clean, isn't it? I still find it hard to believe that it's a mass transit system.

    5. Re:Hide the senders IP address. by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      That is the funny part. IIRC, The Moscow subway system is considered a work of art, and hence they get some kind of international art fund grants to keep it clean.

      And I am quite certain it is not a new station, as it has been at least 8 years since I have been there, and most new stations will not feature mosaics anyway.

      But then again, I spent a while browsing http://metro.ru/stations/ and could not find it.

      --
      badness 10000
  40. Not having search is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the best things about the bit torrent network has been the quality control on the torrents, this is why I have always been wary of programs that say that they will include a torrent search feature. On the other had this is a very positive step with the removal of the requirement of a tracker, which has been my primary irritation with bit torrent.

    Brilthor

    1. Re:Not having search is good by tnhtnh · · Score: 0

      If only google could catalogue torrents... :)

  41. Kademlia not ed2k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    ed2k is not decentralised (depends on servers)
    Kademlia (included in all the popular ed2k clients) is

  42. Re:Bittorent Sites by tnhtnh · · Score: 0

    I think those people may also know how to use google ;)

  43. Yes by PeterBrett · · Score: 1

    ...because if you're running something other than Solaris/Linux/Windows on a x86{,-64} or Sparc box, 80% of the Java software out there won't work.

    Whereas the *full* Python VM is available for just about *every* platform I can think of right now.

  44. Really? by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 1

    I can't get it to run on OSX behind a firewall, but my PC computer (which for some reasons, seems to have no problem with this) Azerus is really really slow when compared to C++ competetors like BitComet. The difference is insane.

    1. Re:Really? by dave1g · · Score: 1

      do you mean slow as in UI performance or slow downloads?

  45. Which is a HUGE problem for those of using by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 1

    PPC Linux, since 1.5 doesn't exist for PPC Linux.

    1. Re:Which is a HUGE problem for those of using by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wahhhh!

  46. I gotta say... by trawg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it in-fucking-credible that Slashdot editors are willing to post an item that includes comments to the effect of: "gee, I hope [insert name of software/network/strategy] allows us to easily replicate the behaviour of [insert name of some other software/network/strategy that has previously been shut down for basically doing nothing but providing a system for people to easily infringe copyright, and more often than not charging users to do it]!"

    BitTorrent is great. p2p is great, in general. But continually highlighting how great it is for piracy (yeh, regardless of how lame the RIAA/MPAA are) just puts more negative attention on it and further affixes the concept of "p2p is bad" in people's minds, rather than what they should be thinking.

    I don't know if slashdot editors actually are willing to edit posts rather than just put them up (I can see reasons for doing it and reasons for not doing it), but this post would have been just super without the last sentence.

    1. Re:I gotta say... by pdevor · · Score: 1
      "BitTorrent is great. p2p is great, in general. But continually highlighting how great it is for piracy (yeh, regardless of how lame the RIAA/MPAA are) just puts more negative attention on it and further affixes the concept of "p2p is bad" in people's minds, rather than what they should be thinking.

      I don't know if slashdot editors actually are willing to edit posts rather than just put them up (I can see reasons for doing it and reasons for not doing it), but this post would have been just super without the last sentence."
      I beg to differ. Having an open and honest discussion is always preferable to hiding or trying to cover up information.

      We're the good guys, remember?
    2. Re:I gotta say... by trawg · · Score: 1
      I beg to differ. Having an open and honest discussion is always preferable to hiding or trying to cover up information.


      I'm not saying they should cover up information - on the contrary I think everyone should be spreading the message about how awesome BitTorrent is and what a great method of content distribution it is.

      But, I do think comments that basically imply the sole purpose of the technology (or at least, the sole purpose that the submitter intends to use the technology for) is copyright infringement should be left out - if only for the fact that (especially in a pseudo-legitimate publication such as slashdot), it is basically greenlighting the use of such applications for such a purpose.
    3. Re:I gotta say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The **AA's long-arm of the law doesn't reach beyond the USA, and I'm fairly certain quite a few Slashdotters reside outside of the USA's borders, so this "outrageously unlawful" news is pretty interesting to quite a few people.

      Also, keep in mind that these "strategies" were organised by those of the USA, which explains why they were taken down quite easily.

    4. Re:I gotta say... by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Hey now.

      No criticizing their freeloading attempts. Any badspeak about P2P and how ripping off movies and music is bad will get you modded negatively here.

      Of course, violate the GPL and you'll get harassed too. Hypocracy.

    5. Re:I gotta say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, the last time I watched an ISO of Linux it turned out to be really boring and the quality sucked....

    6. Re:I gotta say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or:

      Customer: Editor! Editor! There is a fact in my news!

      Editor: I'm terribly sorry, Sir. Usually the censors don't let that happen.

      Customer: Just don't let it happen again. I don't want to see anything that is harmful to me. And bring the Freedom of Speech separately so I can pick and choose. Sheesh, what are you trying to do, let someone know the truth or something?

    7. Re:I gotta say... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Hypocrisy, even. Not that anyone cares about this point dragged out every time p2p or gpl comes up.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    8. Re:I gotta say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're stupid. Stop posting.

    9. Re:I gotta say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not hypocrisy if you actually think about it for more than a second. The GPL and commercial interests are two completely different ideals that utilize the same framework of law to achieve their goals.

    10. Re:I gotta say... by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      Ever consider that, perhaps, there's enough people in Slashdot's hundreds of thousands of readers to generate a nearly unique set of posters for each topic?

      That the people upset about GPL violations may be different than the pro-filesharing contingent?

  47. Re:Bittorrent killed Enterprise! by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

    *cough*

    How, exactly, do you propose that ANYONE knows how I view my television shows?

    Furthermore, are you trying to say that you think that Neilson familes are teh 1337 h4xX0r5 that watch TV via bittorrent? It's not like they have gnomes in every home that MONITOR your watching of TV/Videos. Do you, per chance, wear a tinfoil hat?

  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. use emule for the torrents. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    Use emule to find your popular torrents ("britney spears"). Download using your favourite torrent client.

    Use emule to find and download your impopular files ( ancient games )

    The torrent protocol does work great for popular files, and with this new extension it is less dependand on a central tracker.

  50. Re:Bittorrent killed Enterprise! by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I think that Enterprise was actually killed by P2P technology, such as Bittorrent.

    I doubt it. Look at Battlestar Gallactice, which was downloaded left/right/up and down around the globe. It still managed to get renewed.

    Nah, I think it's because Enterprise didn't know what direction it was going.

  51. Gnutella + BitTorrent by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems to me that the most obvious way to decentralise bittorrent would be to just have a separate gnutella network solely for .torrent files, along with a hack in the client that automatically runs bittorrent on the downloaded files.

    Gnutella has progressed over the years, and is the fastest P2P app I know for small files. It would handle searching etc. too, and if you've tried a client like gtk-gnutella, you know that high-quality filtering is no problem.

    1. Re:Gnutella + BitTorrent by m50d · · Score: 1

      Shush. People think these new apps are all better, and that keeps the attention on them. Meanwhile we can quietly get everything off gnutella and laugh at them.

      --
      I am trolling
  52. BitComet is pretty fast by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    But Azereus isn't "insanely" slow either. I get the same throughput from either (Azereus on OS X vs. BitComet on Windows).

    --
    -Stu
    1. Re:BitComet is pretty fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is. I have a petty p233mmx with 192megs of memory, and ABC works like a charm. Azureus, on the other hand, brings my thinkpad to a screeching halt. Of course it isn't insanely slow if you've got the resources to throw around - but then nothing is insanely slow.

    2. Re:BitComet is pretty fast by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

      Running a Java application on a computer from 1997 (EIGHT YEARS OLD) and looking for performance is what I would call ... misplaced expectations. I can't even get Firefox to run well on a P233 MMX.

      --
      -Stu
  53. Re:Although BitTorrent is legal, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. The stuff on Suprnova were .torrent files, which do NOT contain a single bit of copyrighted material.

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Re:Using it now -- Danger Will! by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What happens when you want to shut it down? I tried it out last night, and when I was done and gracefully stopped and removed the torrent, waited, and then shut down Azureus, my fricken connection was hammered with UDP packets.

    Exactly how long does this decentralized system take to recognize that someone is no longer connected, don't want to talk and (especially) has perhaps handed the DHCP IP address to the next person? I think I'll give it another try, but if I get results like last night I'll either disable that feature or give Azureus the boot.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  56. em.. by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let's get some perspective. 266MHz isn't "a year or two" ago, it's been SEVEN YEARS since Intel released the P2 @ 266mhz. I have a 233MHz from that era, and you can barely even run Firefox on it (IE runs "OK"). Furthermore, 1997-1998 would be the era of Java 1.1 and 1.2, which were significantly slower.

    These days, and since the year 2000 with the release of Java 1.3, Java UI's have been very usable. And Java is much faster than Python; it's comparing mixed mode dynamic compilation (Java) vs. interpreted (Python)! Pysco's JIT release in 2003 may have sped things up somewhat, but it's far from mainstream.

    As for running on a 266Mhz machine, what's "plenty" of Python apps? Were they all graphical? I think you'd find graphical Python to be pretty pokey (pyGTK or what have you). Command-line Java is pretty fast.

    --
    -Stu
    1. Re:em.. by zorander · · Score: 1

      I have written moderately large graphical python applications and they're anything but pokey. In my experience, wxPython is much more responsive than swing on the same machine. This even feels true on the mac, which is bizarre since Apple has supposedly put so much into the java vm. I realize that benchmarks with regard to throughput and java show it to be absolutely faster, but if it doesn't provide a better user experience, what's the point?

      I can't imagine the project that I'd choose to use java on. It seems that in the absence of anything else, C# is at least a more well designed language that does similar things. More likely, I'd code user interaction/business logic in a lightweight scripting language and build the low-level, performance critical parts in ANSI-C. It's a lot easier to write portable C when you're only implementing a few performance-critical functions than when you're trying to build a whole application (think GUI, sockets, etc.) This methodology hasn't caused me to shoot myself in the foot yet.

      Java should be used where it does a reasonably good job--servers. Java is a monster when it comes to throughput but only so-so on latency, so why use it in a low-throughput, low-latency situation?

      Can anyone explain to me the memory footprint? Baseline for a java runtime environment and hello, world is about 6-8 times what python takes to do the same? Actually, it's more than some medium-sized python projects I've worked on. What gives?

      I like how you criticize pyGTK although you haven't used it. Actually, you probably have used it, and couldn't tell the difference between pyGTK and GTK in C--I know I can't.

    2. Re:em.. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Java should be used where it does a reasonably good job--servers.

      Azureus is a server. So is every other P2P filesharing program. That's the whole point of P2P.

      Java is a monster when it comes to throughput but only so-so on latency, so why use it in a low-throughput, low-latency situation?

      Isn't P2P filesharing a high-latency, high-throughput situation ? I, for one, care more about when the download finishes than when it starts...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:em.. by zorander · · Score: 1

      So use a Java backend to do the network talking and a lighter-weight (native?) frontent, sort of like the eDonkey model--where you have a locally running eDonkey server that the native (and responsive) client connects to.

      You made the argument for it, you just missed the conclusion. The purpose of the user interface is to interface with the user. Responsiveness is key. I don't want to wait for the visual feedback of a button push regardless of whether under the hood, my program is a 'server' or not.

      P2P filesharing is high throughput high latency, but Azureus is more than that. It's a user interface to the Bittorrent network, as well as being a server on it. This makes a strong case for viewing the application in two decoupled pieces that communicate through some sort of IPC.

    4. Re:em.. by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude your "business logic" is totally backward on this one. First of all, for an app like this users don't give a rat's ass about whether the window resizes at 300 fps with flicker or 10 fps without flicker; consider that kazaa was a hit even though it was ungodly slow. Sometimes it took seconds to switch tabs and it regularly took basically all of the computer's resources. People still used it because it just worked and it worked well.

      Why do you think people stopped using the C-based bittorrent clients? It's because they didn't "just work". They didn't let you easily manage more than one stream, or throttle the bandwidth, or give nice-looking feedback on what parts were done, or recover from errors (ie not just die all the sudden), or support plug-ins, or have a built-in http server to check status, or work cross-platform, etc.

      It would take a long time to make an interface as nice as Azureus in wxPython because writing widgets that display what chunks of the file are downloaded, the bandwith charts, etc and making it all update in realtime and stay consistent with your non-python core code would not be a simple task. Managing lots of multithreaded channels in C (or C++) and making it efficient and reliable would also not happen; your app would crash unexpectedly because doing that in those languages takes a lot of work. In Java it might take a day to add plug-in support and, if you wanted them to, the plug-ins could do basically any other part of the program could. That's essentially impossible in C, and very risky in a scripting language (since there are basically no sanity checks whatsoever).

      So yeah, when you want to sell some complicated IT "solution", wxPython + C is a "good" choice. But for something like Azureus Java is really the best choice.

    5. Re:em.. by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

      I have written moderately large graphical python applications and they're anything but pokey. In my experience, wxPython is much more responsive than swing on the same machine.

      I've used pyslsk which was written with wxPython, and it was pretty pokey. Useful, nonetheless.

      I realize that benchmarks with regard to throughput and java show it to be absolutely faster, but if it doesn't provide a better user experience, what's the point?

      The point is that you have several posters here suggesting that Azeurus' overall experience is quite good. I can add in other Java applications here too (Eclipse being an obvious one).

      can't imagine the project that I'd choose to use java on. It seems that in the absence of anything else, C# is at least a more well designed language that does similar things. More likely, I'd code user interaction/business logic in a lightweight scripting language and build the low-level, performance critical parts in ANSI-C.

      Depends on the kinds of projects you do, I suppose. I have no qualms with using C# or even scripting languages for business logic, though I question the practicality of doing the latter in the face of integration requirements (are you going to use Python to integrate with Siebel, PeopleSoft or SAP?), team knowledge (what do people know? What are you willing to sacrifice to get them to learn it ?), etc.

      C# is a good language but I'd hardly call it a tremendous improvement over Java 5 -- they're rather on par, with minor differences.

      As for ANSI-C for performance critical parts, I frankly haven't seen many "business" system that has required this in over 5 years. Most financial trading systems and banking applications these days run Java + WebLogic or WebSphere, or on .NET / COM+. Most client applications use either a messaging toolkit (MSMQ, JMS, .NET remoting, etc.) or plain HTTP for communication. Before Java 1.4.2 I could see the need for ANSI C to handle multiplexed non-blocking I/O, but now... the number of opportunities are fewer.

      Java should be used where it does a reasonably good job--servers. Java is a monster when it comes to throughput but only so-so on latency, so why use it in a low-throughput, low-latency situation?

      Like a P2P client??? oh, wait.

      Can anyone explain to me the memory footprint? Baseline for a java runtime environment and hello, world is about 6-8 times what python takes to do the same? Actually, it's more than some medium-sized python projects I've worked on. What gives?

      Don't know, not that big a deal, all things considered. This is somewhat of a red herring, you know.

      I like how you criticize pyGTK although you haven't used it. Actually, you probably have used it, and couldn't tell the difference between pyGTK and GTK in C--I know I can't.

      Well, I personally can't stand the API, but that's just taste. As for performance, I could tell the difference, though it wasn't the bindings I was complaining about, it was Python in general, for the kind of application I was writing.

      Look, I like Python, it's a wonderful language, I prefer Ruby but I do recommend people to look at it all the time. I'm just calling for some perspective - it's not faster than Java, (Ruby isn't either), and it doesn't particularly have a better user experience, from both a server developer or client developer's perspective, though again it depends on what you're trying to do, with how many resources, and what constraints. And the client experience isn't really Python's fault, it is a general problem with environments coming from an X heritage -- a'la'carte toolkits, dependencies galore, nothing "just works", need a package manager like Fink to track it all.

      --
      -Stu
    6. Re:em.. by m50d · · Score: 1

      Java UIs are not useable on my system, 800mhz from 3 years ago (but it wasn't top of the range then, yes). The fact is gui java is much slower than gui python. It's not java that's the problem, it's swing. In fact it's not even swing that's the problem, it's sun's implementation of it. But that doesn't matter; practically, all gui java apps are dog slow. (CLI java is no better or worse than any other language, but cli apps are generally not desktop programs) Graphical python runs fast, because pygtk or pyqt is just a thin wrapper on the fast c funtions. Wheras swing does every pixel in java. And I'm pretty sure python is JIT, and if you're convinced the java interpreter is faster then you can compile python to java bytecode with jython and run it in there. Most people don't, because the JVM is a huge memory hog and no faster performance-wise.

      --
      I am trolling
    7. Re:em.. by m50d · · Score: 1

      You don't need a non-python core. Write a python core, use wxpython or pykde or anything you like to do the gui. You can't seriously claim writing widgets in swing is easier than the toolkits you can use from python, swing is goofy, probably because it has (next to) no competition. Plugins for python are very easy, certainly no harder than java, yes security could do with some work, but as you say the plugin can do anything the app can, so plugins have to be trusted.

      --
      I am trolling
    8. Re:em.. by zorander · · Score: 1

      I know at least one major player in the financial world that does *all* internal coding in C (and some C++). It's not as rare as you think. They're a very, very performance conscious. company. When I interviewed with them, I spend two hours discussing details of struct packing, macros vs. inlining, how templates/virtuals are implemented in c++, etc. Java/C# are not all there is to this game.

      I compared wxPython and Swing and you refuted with two examples of SWT apps (Eclipse, Azureus). I wasn't talking about SWT (which is, designwise, extremely similar to wx and should be comparably good).

      The memory footprint kept java out of an embedded application where python is now excelling. In retrospect, I'm glad we went with python, but we had performance concerns at the time and were considering java. I wouldn't call it a "red herring". We didn't have the cash for a proper Micro Edition install when the project started, so Python it was.

      I to prefer ruby, but there are, as of yet, no particularly good GUI options for it, so I was using python as an example. If you're using ruby and haven't checked out rails, please do. It's quite a trip. Much of my work now has shifted into rails (The embedded systems company decided it was time for a real internet presence/online store) and I'm the one versatile enough to do it, so now I get to play with rails)

      Read my comment earlier in the thread about how a P2P client is both a server (high latency, high throughput) and a user interface (low latency, low throughput) and how unless a language is around that can support both sides well, it should be split into two pieces around that boundary.

      wxPython installs with a simple installer binary on Mac OS X and Windows. So does python--Yes this is another dependency, but you can use py2exe on windows and bundlebuilder/distutils on Mac OS to get a good package that depends on *nothing* and carries the wx Libs onboard. The only system that has the issues you describe is Linux, which to be fair, has trouble packaging *anything*.

    9. Re:em.. by zorander · · Score: 1

      Look at all the frontends to mlDonkey. No one cares that it's implemented in Ocaml underneath. The frontends are written in everything from python to objective-C (Poisoned) and IMHO are more usable/featureful than a lot of one-language, one-piece P2P apps (limewire and kazaa, for example, which are ungodly slow).

      Have you ever designed a three-tier application? The boundaries tend to fall right into place and saves a lot of development time. Having two (or three) components that talk along a clean, concise interface is not a difficult or overcomplicated way to program. If you use some sort of packaged IPC mechanism, then it's even cleaner.

      wxPython and SWT are awfully similar in design and API. Why should it take any longer to write the same interface in either of them? I'd expect the python one to be faster to write since dynamic typing and a terser code format mean less work for the developer. If you follow MVC, the view code should be quite small anyhow. I don't see your point.

    10. Re:em.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1. Python is JITed only with Psyco, which many apps don't use. Even when JITed, Python is *much* slower (up to 150x on worst cases, believe it or not) than Java on raw numeric computation, method calls etc.
      2. Jython doesn't convert Python to Java bytecode. Jython is a Python interpreter written in Java, thus much slower than running plain Java (200x slowdown thanks to interpretation is pretty common). Java bytecode doesn't even allow the dynamic constructs that Python uses.

    11. Re:em.. by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

      I know at least one major player in the financial world that does *all* internal coding in C (and some C++). It's not as rare as you think. They're a very, very performance conscious. company. When I interviewed with them, I spend two hours discussing details of struct packing, macros vs. inlining, how templates/virtuals are implemented in c++, etc. Java/C# are not all there is to this game.

      Fair enough, interesting to get another anecdote to keep a realistic perspective (seeing how I work for a J2EE vendor, the kool-aid avoidance gets hard at times).

      And good points on SWT v. Swing (though WebLogic Workshop is pretty good these days, and it's Swing), embedded memory constraints (I thought there were RT Java impl's that fixed this, but it's been a while) & the ease of OS X vs. Linux packaging.

      --
      -Stu
    12. Re:em.. by m50d · · Score: 1

      Hmm, ok. I can easily believe that python can be 150x slower in places, and I know it's no speed demon for raw computation, but that doesn't matter because it uses C for the bits which take up most of the run time. The fact is guis in python are far faster than those in swing. You could probably outperform the python programs with a java program that uses jni wrappers to qt or gtk, but that doesn't seem to be the java way. Sun swing is slow, and every desktop java app I've seen uses it.

      --
      I am trolling
  57. Despite the sarcasm by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    ...that's still a valid question.

    Some answers:

    1) If a big, high-bandwidth tracker dies, everybody can keep downloading, and can even create a URL that lets new people join the torrent.

    2) If a little guy without the bandwidth to run a mega-tracker wants to create a torrent, and for whatever reason doesn't want to upload to a public tracker, he can publish a distributed URL which shares the burden of both downloads and tracking amongst the other peers. I imagine this will be particularly useful in limited-interest torrents. For example in intranets, or if the torrent is such that it would be booted from a public tracker (for being eg: too niche).

    3) It simplifies the job of torrent-aggregating sites too. They don't need to publish torrent files or maintain trackers. They can just list these textual URLs and let Azureus do the heavy lifting.

  58. No change there by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    I don't know the details, but I can reasonably assume this new system does the same thing, maintains a partially connected mesh. Otherwise on really popular torrents you might spend the first half hour downloading IPs! That would just be silly.

    1. Re:No change there by eluusive · · Score: 1

      An IP is 4 bytes in network byte order. 1 million of those would be 4 million bytes: 4 x 10^6. That's approximately 3906 kilobytes or about 4 megabytes. I dunno, but most torrents don't have 1 million peers.

  59. Does it work in OS X 10.4.0 ? by tcoady · · Score: 1

    When I open the jar this appears in my console:

    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/eclipse/swt/widgets/Display
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread.(SWT Thread.java:75)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread.crea teInstance(SWTThread.java:58)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.Initializer.(I nitializer.java:107)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.(Main.java:71)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.main(Main.java:98)

    1. Re:Does it work in OS X 10.4.0 ? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Apparently it isn't been ported to OS X yet. Like everything concerning Java, it doesn't live up to the hype.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Does it work in OS X 10.4.0 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are running SWT, you are no longer "pure java" and back into the mess of platform-dependant C code.

    3. Re:Does it work in OS X 10.4.0 ? by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      Last night I was usiing the old Azureus client on my Mac (which is running Tiger) and it told me the new version was available. I did what it said (click yes I would like to update, click yes I would like to restart) and the new decentralized version was up and running, and seemed to get better throughput than the old one... rather than stopping for a while, torrents without enough seeds would usually slow to a trickle but keep making progress.

      I don't know anything about your particular Java problem, I wish I could help. But, I just wanted to chime in to say that despite what a few people have posted, the new Azureus works fine on Macs, including under Tiger.

    4. Re:Does it work in OS X 10.4.0 ? by what+about · · Score: 1

      You may be one of the Longhorn zealots :-)

      Nothing to do with Java Write Once Run Anywhere...

      If you look at the stack trace, it is SWT, if it was swing then it would have run.

    5. Re:Does it work in OS X 10.4.0 ? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      That's the new version of Windows? What does hating Java have to do with Windows?

      I thought MS even quit shipping their broken VM.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:Does it work in OS X 10.4.0 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can not find SWT libraries. If previous version was not using Eclipse and you don't have SWT on you machine you'll have to install it. if you already have it this is problem with classpath parameter in the script (or shortcut) that launches Azureus.

      FYI:

      "NoClassDefFoundError" in javaspeak is roughly "can not find a shared library". To be more precise, it can not find a specific class in the libraries it is looking at.

      SWT is a UI toolkit of the Eclipse project.

    7. Re:Does it work in OS X 10.4.0 ? by javaxman · · Score: 1
      Apparently it isn't been ported to OS X yet. Like everything concerning Java, it doesn't live up to the hype.

      It's their use of SWT that prevents it from being cross-platform. It's SWT that doesn't live up to the hype.

      They could have choosen Swing and it'd work everywhere, right now. But since they chose SWT, which relies on JNI bridges to call native OS UI libraries, they have to wait for SWT builds for 10.4.

      I really, really don't understand why you'd write a Java program with SWT, unless you found a serious problem with Swing and were really only looking to support Windows. In which case, why use Java at all? You might as well write in VisualC++ or C# ( or Cocoa/Objective-C ) if you're going to tie yourself closely to native code.

      Here's a great rant on SWT.

      Personally, I've never used SWT, but... it just doesn't sound like a great idea.

    8. Re:Does it work in OS X 10.4.0 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have used SWT, and it works consistently well on every platform I've tried (Windows, Pocket PC, Mac OS X, Linux/GTK2, and -- just out of curiosity -- Solaris/Motif). Swing's API is nice, but despite the nonsense Sun has been spouting lately about "Swing looks native and is nearly as fast", SWT's performance is much better on low-end devices, and the fact it actually resembles native apps is a nice bonus.

      Granted, it requires corresponding JNI libraries, but so does Swing. (If you don't believe me, grab a copy of the Swing .JAR file and try running it on a J2ME Personal Profile runtime, which has AWT but not Swing. It'll bomb out because of missing native methods. Sun gets away with saying Swing is pure Java because they pushed the native peering hooks that Swing needs down into AWT, but the distinction is mostly academic for people like me who just want to deploy GUI apps on Pocket PCs.) Sun just has the advantage that they get to decide which native libraries get packaged with the JRE and which don't.

      Unfortunately Sun seems to have a serious NIH syndrome when it comes to Java. From what I've read on java.net, a lot of the people on Sun's Java team are rabidly pro-Swing and pro-NetBeans, almost to the point that they take people using SWT and Eclipse as a personal insult. Which is a shame, since Eclipse is probably one of the best things to happen to Java in a long time.

    9. Re:Does it work in OS X 10.4.0 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because they want sub-pixel anti-aliased fonts so that their program doesn't look like shit.

  60. Version control system w/BitTorrent? by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    At the company where I work, we are "re-evaluating" our commitment to a major Configuration Management (CM) package, due to various issues. We are studying several commercial packages -- nothing in the open-source arena meets our requirements. Most of the CM systems we've seen use a single, centralized server, and these suffer from excessive item "get" ("check out", "get copy") times for non-local users. The problem appears to be network latency, rather than bandwidth. Getting a single 8MB item is relatively fast, but getting 4500+ small items can take too long. There's just too much per-item overhead.

    So I was thinking ... why not use something like BitTorrent as the item distribution engine?

    NOTE: Yes, systems like StarTeam and MKS use distributed replication or proxy servers. They're on the short list. And thanks, please don't suggest <insert mom's favorite version control system>. Our needs go way beyond simple VC.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  61. dumbest thing ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is so dumb:
    the replacement to SuprNova and Lokitorrents, or does the lack of
    search negate its effectiveness?"

    The point is to complete your 1.4 GB download
    that is at 1.0 GBs, not to search. You can easily
    search for torrents and trackers and torrent search engine
    cough**isohunt**mininova**

    just type allinurl:torrent simpsons season OR complete

  62. A few notes by JPelorat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rather a lot of bullets are spent on paper and animal targets. More than 1% of the total, guaranteed.

    A significant portion of the vs-person use of guns is justified and legal and occurs every day all around the world. Self-defense and apprehension of criminals being the two most common examples.

    Using extreme exaggeration as an appeal to authority is self-defeating. Easpecially when you attempt to lay down 'the truth'.

    My signature may be of some help in this matter.

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  63. Design is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A gun is an inanimate chunk of metal. An inanimate chunk of metal is not inherently evil, no matter how much you wish it to be so.

  64. OMG pretty by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously, if you want to know why Azureus is so damn cool, just click on the new "swarm" tab on a running torrent. Ye gods, but that's beauty! Perfectly abstract, instantly comprehensible, informative in realtime, mesmerizing as a screensaver. You have to respect the kind of people who'd think up something like that.

    (Karma bonus turned off because this is OT, but damn, I just had to say that.)

    1. Re:OMG pretty by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      You mean the guy who wrote Bits on Wheels (Mac OS X)?

  65. Wait! Wait! Wait! by trezor · · Score: 1

    "Eyes wide shut" is porn?

    You need to spend more time on the internet.

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  66. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is perfectly on topic , it is a parody of the grandparent.
    And its on topic in and of itself , unless you missed the fact that a large share of the debate is on the legality.

    =Sharky=

  67. Crappy client... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to use AZ. I always found my downloads to be slower than yABC and BitTornado's would be. That and AZ is Java which seems to suck the resources out of my machine if I have it open for more than a few hours.

  68. War by highspl · · Score: 1

    I don't think there are many hunters in Baghdad.

    --
    It puts the lotion on it's skin, or else it gets the hose again.
  69. Reputation Management in BitTorrent by chris311 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've just completed a Master's project on incorporating Reputation Management into BitTorrent. The idea is that if you give file slices first to people who are likely to stay connected and share, it will increase the overall bandwidth of the system and eventually increase everyone's performance. My simulation results show an average speedup of 5% for everyone in the network (good citizens get up to 15% speedup). I don't have a website, but if anyone wants to contact me about getting my research into the spec, I'd be happy to send you the paper.
    clenfest@yahoo.com

    1. Re:Reputation Management in BitTorrent by chris311 · · Score: 0

      I should also mention that I built a client based on the standard BitTorrent v4.0.1 client lest you think it is only theoretical.

    2. Re:Reputation Management in BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a link somewhere to your publication and/or reference implementation(s)?

  70. Azureus is not Java (TM) Application by Gopal.V · · Score: 1
    I gained a lot of respect for Java apps when I tried Azureus for the first time.

    Sun would have fit if you called an SWT application a java application. Which in turn proves that Sun is truly a hardware company and has always been. Java has been wasted on Sun.

    1. Re:Azureus is not Java (TM) Application by CoderBob · · Score: 0, Troll

      I would say Java's just a waste, actually, not that Java is wasted on Sun.

      Good idea, piss poor implementation. To begin with, OO is not the end-all, and having a language force that down your throat when it isn't even necessary is a PITA.

      Add in the horrendously slow execution times for _most_ Java apps (SWT apps, whatever. If I need that blasted JavaVM, it's a Java app.), the bloat the language has experienced, and the fact that it ties my hands six ways from Sunday when I try to write code, and you have a lose-lose situation.

      Python isn't incredibly fast, either. And it can be a large pain in the arse to code for. But at least it isn't completely OO based, and I can use objects where I need to, and leave them the hell alone when I don't.

  71. mldonkey by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    Plus, there is no official support for non-Windows platforms.

    The eMule client itself is not official. If you want official, look at eDonkey Basic for Linux. Or just use mldonkey like everyone else does.

  72. Not all movies are available on DVD by tepples · · Score: 1

    My advice is just to BUY the DVD you were going to rip off.

    Can you point me to an online store selling a legit copy of Walt Disney Pictures' Song of the South?

    1. Re:Not all movies are available on DVD by FriedTurkey · · Score: 1

      Can you point me to an online store selling a legit copy of Walt Disney Pictures' Song of the South?

      You can find it on Ebay. It is still sold in Japan. Where do you think the pirated copies on the torrents come from?

    2. Re:Not all movies are available on DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you point me to an online store selling a legit copy of Walt Disney Pictures' Song of the South?

      Zip-ba-de-ebay

      zip-be-de-bay

      my oh my ebay got a dvd to play

  73. Try looking into Telelogic Synercy/CM by israfil_kamana · · Score: 1

    It's got replication, highly configurable workflow management, and is integrated fully with Synergy/Change and DOORS. It also has a nifty feature called ActiveCM, which is an explorer SCM integration that rocks for uninitiated users. Like Tortoise{CVS|SVN} only smarter. Just a thought. I recently reviewed them for a Change/SCM software purchase by my client. They went (against my recommendation) with IBM.

    (No, I don't work for them, nor have accepted any compensation from them. -i)

    --
    i - This sig provided by /dev/random and an infinite number of monkeys at keyboards.
    1. Re:Try looking into Telelogic Synercy/CM by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
      Been there, done that.

      Issues

      • builds are not repeatable
      • changes are not atomic
      • Ch Req attachments are not versioned
      • Uses "merge meister" and "build master" methodology. We don't.
      • "Standard" Java. Ha. As if. I've got 3 "standard" and incompatible versions of JRE on my system, each installed by a different tool vendor. In my universe, Java means "write once / run (slowly) nowhere"
      Pluses
      • Integration with DOORS should be Ok.
      • Uses TCP/IP (our VPN will only do TCP/IP)
      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  74. Wait a tick... by Moofie · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "offers 'a distributed, decentralised database that can be used to track decentralised torrents. "

    Wait, but is it decentralis[z]ed AND distributed?

    Department of redundancy department...

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  75. Re:Runs.. by IndiepoprockJesse · · Score: 0

    i got the latest, and it still runs like shit... Azureus just got a memory leak from here to Tokyo (in which here would be Amsterdam), i hope they fix it soon, untill that i'll use bitlord..

  76. Re:Bittorrent killed Enterprise! by theArtificial · · Score: 0

    "Nah, I think it's because Enterprise didn't know what direction it was going." Such a polite way to say "steaming pile" ;)

    --
    Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
  77. 99%?!? by gmikej · · Score: 1
    Are you absolutely insane? Where do you anti-gun nuts come up with this stuff? No wonder you are scared of guns. If I thought that 99% of gun users planned on using them against other people I would move my family to rural Alaska.

    You see, most gun users use them for recreation.

    Most of the time on /. I read ultra-liberal views and I take them with a grain of salt. But you my friend are so far off- and with information like that you are part of the problem. You are helping to create a society of frieghtened, irrational people that look to the government for answers- and you wouldn't mind if they had to raise your taxes (and give up some of your liberties) to do it.

    Be self sufficient. Work hard. Stand up for what you believe in.

    Don't just watch the evening news and think that that is reflective of our society today. Otherwise, you will be a very depressed, cynical person.

    Oh wait... nm

  78. Re:Bittorrent killed Enterprise! by rob_squared · · Score: 0
    "down"

    This comment was meant to be: [x]Funny [_]Insightful [_]Flamebate [_]Troll

    --
    I don't get it.
  79. Azureus on gcj by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those of you who were complaining about having to run a proprietary JVM, I give you Azureus on gcj in Fedora Core.....

    http://spindazzle.org/pics/azureus-on-gcj4-2004-12 -9.png

    Instead of porting for python, why not help stabilize this port?

  80. Re:Bittorrent killed Enterprise! by jeffy210 · · Score: 1

    "But in space the only way to lay down is to get a duck"

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  81. Re: What would you know about sex, nerd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would you know about sex, nerd? And, doing your mom doesn't count; everyone did your mom.

  82. exeem by Selcitset · · Score: 0

    exeem is junk, loaded with spyware, didnt work when i tried it anyways, never trying it again. goddamn spyware, i hate you so much.

  83. Mission accomplished by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry but the gun was not invented for recreational use. It was invented as a weapon of war to maim and destroy people.

    Well it's worked well enough at maiming your ability to have a rational discourse, so mission accomplished!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  84. No the wouldn't... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Sun would have fit if you called an SWT application a java application.

    Sorry, they really don't care if you use Swing, AWt, SWT, or roll your own. The core app is still Java no matter how you slice it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  85. Re:Bittorrent killed Enterprise! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    This is only a valid comment if raters who are tracked didn't watch Enterprise because they downloaded it.

    In a fundamental way, ratings are a crock. They do not reflect what real people are doing necessarily and it is not in the ratings companies interest to show reality if total usage is dropping. The networks give them heavy pressure when the numbers drop too much.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  86. Needs Java 1.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a developers preview of 1.5, should be out really soon (like a week or two).

  87. Finally... by xRelisH · · Score: 2, Funny

    those Paris Hilton Torrents wont be broken!

  88. Grey market uses by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    A lot of bittorrent use is sort of "grey market" infringment. Like missing "Survivor" at the regular time, so you downloaded it, or downloading things like "Doctor Who" in the US where there is no legitimate way to watch it.

    But more to the point, legally speaking, it doesn't matter of the majority of uses are illegitimate. What matters is if there is a significate legitimate use. That's trivial to show for bittorrent.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  89. Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BitTorrent is the result of a Ph.D. thesis? Bram Cohen didn't even finish undergrad, and from listening to his talk at Stanford he didn't seem to be aware of other research in the area. So if he did it all himself, how is it based on a Ph.D. thesis?

  90. Some statistics by Saanvik · · Score: 3, Informative

    Good point, you should have done it rather than posting about it.

    Here are some statistics for your hungry little minds.

    From the Illinois Council against Handgun Violence

    In 2002, there were 30,242 gun deaths in the U.S.

    Digging a little deeper, from the Department of Justice

    The number of gunshot wounds from assaults treated in hospital emergency departments fell from 64,100 in 1993 to 39,400 in 1997, a 39% decline. Homicides committed with a firearm fell from 18,300 in 1993 to 13,300 in 1997, a 27% decline.

    And from the Burlington Free Press

    Vermont's loss of hunters is part of a national trend. The number of hunters declined from 14.06 million to 13.03 million, or 7.3 percent, from 1991 to 2001, according to the Census Bureau and the Fish and Wildlife Service. The drop was greater in the West -- 9.6 percent, from 2.46 million to 2.22 million.

    Not a direct comparison, but it's hard to find numbers detailing the number of times a gun was discharged at a person versus discharged at an animal or target. Nevertheless, it's pretty apparent the original poster was incorrect. The vast majority of shooting in the US is not at people, but at animals and targets.

    So, back on topic. The analogy was not a good one. A closer analogy could be made for handguns (handguns are not designed for hunting, but a lot of people do use them for target practice), but it still wouldn't be a good one.

    1. Re:Some statistics by JacobO · · Score: 1
      The number of hunters declined


      Unless the decline is the result of the hunting itself :-)
  91. Re:Although BitTorrent is legal, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They contained hashes of the file they were linking to. That constitutes a derivative work.

  92. Re: Its SMART; its just file transfer by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Legally, its SMART to just transfer files.
    The biggest flaw in torrents is the trackers. They needed to make it somewhat distributed.

    If you want to search/browse, use something else. I can't wait for the day when I can click a link in my browser and it downloads just like ftp/http does.

    There are many ways to go about it that do not involve some sort of large p2p network.

  93. BT + Freenet = no point of failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thinking out loud

    Freenet uses a percentage of other peoples disk and bandwidth to host data.
    Add a new data channel to BT, using similar technology to host the torrents in a distributed manner.
    It doesnt need all the major crypto and slowness of Freenet, as it will only be hosting a torrents and nothing else.
    Also, perhaps add a feature to share X% of your bandwidth with others anonymously.
    Then you can legally prove there is an X percent chance that it wasnt you downloading that stuff which will cause havoc with all the law suits.

    There must be a flaw in this idea somewhere, please slap me down. :-)
    /thinking

  94. It's not that easy by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    The question is: why do these people insist on developing their own isolated software instead of using established protocols and systems ? Just merge Bittorrent and gnutella/edonkey and be done with it.

    Merging the code would likely be even more difficult that adding code to either product to achieve a similar result. Even if you were to successfully merge the code, you'd probably end up with an inferior product to maintain backwards compatibility with the older un-merged clients.
    --
    Looking for a pyramid? Join the conga!

  95. You'd be crying anyway. by BobPaul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Try seeding 30 or 40 torrents out of a modest (2GHz, 1GB RAM) machine sometime. It's horrible. If you're web browsing, editing/encoding video, using PhotoShop, scanning film, etc on the same machine, you'll be crying.

    If you were doing all of that on a 2GHz with only 1GB RAM, you'd be crying even if you weren't running Azureus.
    --
    Need Referals? The ref stops here

    1. Re:You'd be crying anyway. by jridley · · Score: 1

      It works fine with BitComet, and it doesn't even drain the system too much. I can watch videos, encode, do my editing, run Apache and MySQL, whatever else, no problems.

  96. It's about interoperability by MaCa · · Score: 1

    This is not about plain language adovocating and flamebait, but about interoperability which, IMHO, is Good Thind ©. ;-)

    You do know that the original and still quite popular BT client is written in python, right? And that there are other quite popular bittorrent clients written in python, right? -- see sourceforge TopDownloaded...

    As you can see, a python client would be very interesting for the whole BT community.

  97. I don't see the point of this.. by d_jedi · · Score: 2

    besides for scum sucking pirates. The story even hints at this use:
    Could this and compatible clients be the replacement to SuprNova and Lokitorrents, or does the lack of search negate its effectiveness?"

    ignoring the fact that Lokitorrent and Suprnova would still be in business if they had trackers to legal files (like Linux distros) instead of illegal pirated music/movies/software.

    All of the pirates can go fcuk themselves. The more you hide, the worse the penalties will be.. and the more inclined content creators will be to use draconian measures to protect their intellectual property.

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
    1. Re:I don't see the point of this.. by rogue303 · · Score: 1

      ...next you'll be telling us that you've never copied a CD, played a pirated game, watched a pirated movie/tv show, or worn pointy ears at a star trek convention... You sir may cast a stone when you are free of sin.

    2. Re:I don't see the point of this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and the more inclined content creators will be to use draconian measures to protect their intellectual property."

      And the deeper they dig the hole they're in.

      If you get to the point where software is impossible to steal, you'll just drive everyone to free software. The reason is: people use the software that the majority uses. If the majority decide to stop pirating Office and switch to OO, others will follow and MS Office is now obsolete.

      Vendors will hate to admit it, or not understand the far-reaching implications of it, but a piracy-free industry is NOT what they want.

    3. Re:I don't see the point of this.. by d_jedi · · Score: 1

      In the words of Rod (or was it Todd?) Flanders,
      "Got him, dad!"
      (ie. I just threw a stone, and hit someone :->)

      In all seriousness, I have copied CDs - CDs that I have a legal right to do so (even bypassing copy protection.. given that that's perfectly legal in Canada).

      Personally, I don't see any great problem with downloading TV episodes (at least, ones that are on broadcast channels that you have access to).. the only difference between downloading and recording it yourself is that the downloaded file is of higher quality, and without commercials. Just so long as you do try to watch it "live" at every opportunity.. I wonder if any shows have been cancelled due to poor ratings that wouldn't have been had people who downloaded the ep. actually watched it on the network airing it..

      --
      I am the maverick of Slashdot
    4. Re:I don't see the point of this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well too bad for you that your personal moral doesn't agree with copyright law. It doesn't agree with mine either, and we're both just as much of a criminal.

      The difference is that you support a system modeled after the lottery. Make it big, become rich and you'll never have to work again. That's exactly what we want popular artist to do, now isn't it? Why make your living from honest work, when you can earn millions year after year without lifting a finger? Hell, you can even make big bucks after you die, for yet another lifetime.

      But oh wait, these aren't the artist we should care about are they? We have to protect internet property law so the poor artist who barely make ends meet can survive, right? You know, the artists who never made anything from intellectual property rights in the first place. Get all or nothing. The winner takes it all. Great idea.

      Intellectual property as a concept is dying, it's just that it hasn't stopped kicking just yet. Still, we have to be careful not to let it seriously defend itself and destroy it's greatest enemy, the internet.

  98. Re:A legal torrent/torrent site that I'd like to s by FunkySquid · · Score: 1

    Not MD5, but http://rainbowtables.shmoo.com/ has LanMan rainbow tables.

  99. Re:Using it now -- Danger Will! by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

    Hammered? What kinds of bandwidth usage were you seeing? I'm getting 175 bytes per second on DHT right now; if you stop responding that should only go down with time. I wouldn't overreact to the UDP packets coming in unless they're of sufficient volume to actually affect your connection speed.

  100. Think about BSD, and old machines by Smiglo · · Score: 0

    I've got old PentiumMMX with 32MB RAM, running original BT client in my basement, its well protected (B.I.S.S. blocklist loaded into PF), and operated via ssh.

    Would Azureus run on it? What about working without GUI?

  101. Fatalistic. by gumpish · · Score: 1


    If there is no higher power than the physical laws of the universe, then guns are just as "natural" and uninvented as sex.

    By this reasoning the concept of "invented" is meaningless and free will is an illusion.

    Not that I necessarily disagree with that sentiment...

    1. Re:Fatalistic. by revery · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      By this reasoning the concept of "invented" is meaningless and free will is an illusion.
      Not that I necessarily disagree with that sentiment...


      It's something that is pretty hard to argue with if one believes in evolution. After all, if we are shaped by both genetic predisposition and the inputs we receive from the moment of conception and their reaction with one another. (i.e. two individuals with different genetic backgrounds but identical inputs - as if that exists - may process the information differently) then it's hard to assert that we have any control over our response to stimulus. We are only doing what we have been prepared by both heredity and environment to do.

      Of course, this line of thinking pretty much leads to despair, and the conclusion that your actions have no significance whatsoever.

      If only there was something bigger than man.

    2. Re:Fatalistic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there was something bigger than man.

      You are ghey.

    3. Re:Fatalistic. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      If only there was something bigger than man.

      "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  102. Re:Using it now -- Danger Will! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    Several UDP packets a second in bursts for at least 20 minutes after shutting down Azureus. (I changed IP addresses after that.) I'm not sure how large the packets were, but it was enough to light an LED or two on my hub traffic scale. There were also quite a lot of ICMP pings from all over during the transfers, but that might have been unrelated.

    I could just ignore it, but I really hate unexplained traffic and it always makes me check the logs and Tcpview to see what's going on.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  103. RIAA Alert! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    ...and I just did a doctoral thesis on Improved Child Porn Distribution Through Client Tracking. Feel free to contact me if you'd like more information.

    OK, so you're probably more legit than that, but it was the first thought I had when I read your post.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  104. Not the step forward it should be... by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

    "Could this and compatible clients be the replacement to SuprNova and Lokitorrents, or does the lack of search negate its effectiveness?"

    The lack of a system that obfuscates the source and destination of data to prevent the RIAA/MPAA/etc from seeing what you are downloading is the feature everyone should be demanding. Decentralising torrents won't make it any harder to have your IP tracked and your identity revealed by court order.

  105. Re:A legal torrent/torrent site that I'd like to s by 00RUSS · · Score: 1

    This site should have what you are looking for! http://rainbowtables.shmoo.com/

    --
    +-+-+-The folowing statement is true. The previous statement is false.-+-+-+
  106. Is killing necessarily evil? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    More accuratly, a gun is designed to propel a projectile in a specified direction. The accuracy and power of the gun depends on the design decisions for size, weight, reliability, operation, etc...

    The projectile may or may not be designed to kill.
    For example, there are beanbag, pepper, and gas rounds designed to be fired from a shotgun. On the other hand, hollow points are designed to expand, helping to ensure maximum energy transmission and disruption of tissue. Softpoints do the same thing, but with more penetration. These are usually used to help insure a humane kill on larger game. FMJ(Full Metal Jacket) is used by the military due to treaty and convention and target shooters due to its inexpensive nature and accuracy. Fragmentary is used in steel target shooting to ensure that the round doesn't deflect back, and to prevent overpenetration (glasers on a plane).

    And who says that killing is necessarily bad? You can kill for food (Good), kill for self-defense(Good, some may argue), kill to defend others (IE police, bodyguards), kill to defend property (why should the bank's money be better protected than the female college student?).

    And remember, we wouldn't suddenly be peaceful if all the guns went *poof*. We made do with swords, spears, bows, knives, hammers, etc long before guns came along. The difference is that a gun is usable by just about anybody, a physically fit individual doesn't have as great of an advantage when the weapons are guns rather than a sword. You get rid of guns, and we're back to the strong having the run of the weak.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  107. Links?!?!! by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

    So do you have any links to a .torrent of the song?!

    -Trillian

  108. Different Answer to a Similar Problem by JonXP · · Score: 1

    Shareaza uses the G2 network to search for other sources for a trackerless or dead torrent. This is something that no other client did, but still is not as efficient as one would think, mainly because 'global' searches don't reach quite as far as they need to to be effective. However, Azureus is using a technology known as DHT to accomplish the source discovery. This is much more efficient than most of the current P2P topologies (G2, Gnutella, ED2K). Long story short, it's mainly useful for situations where you know a unique identifier for an object, and need to find someone else with that same object. In this case the hash of the torrent is unique, and the address of someone else downloading it is what you want.

    A few P2P networks have added DHT overlays to their networks for source finding, while still using the traditional network for the much less precise keyword finding. Morpheus has Neonet and eDonkey has overnet. eMule has Kademlia, which also searches by keyword in the DHT.

  109. Or.... by tacokill · · Score: 1

    "I'm sorry but the gun was not invented for recreational use. It was invented as a weapon of war to maim and destroy people."

    ...or to make hunting a bit easier. Yea, ok, so you don't need an AR-10 to take out a deer -- but your sweeping generalization above could not go untouched. There are PLENTY of legitimate, recreational uses for guns including target practice, hunting, pest control, and others. Saying the gun was invented ONLY to kill people tells me you've never even been around a gun and are most certainly unqualified to make such an assertation.

  110. mnb Re:A step in the right direction... by Murphy+Murph · · Score: 1

    Thost bullets don't have "fear me" written on them, they're made of soft lead designed to leave a large exit wound.

    Actually a large exit wound means the soft lead bullet failed to do it's job to the best of it's abilities. An exit wound of any size means that the bullet passed through the target with at least some energy - energy that would have been better spent causing damage and shock inside the target.

    BTW - I'll mention as a little aside - most gunshot victims die of shock, not tissue damage nor blood loss.

    --
    I dub thee... Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass.
    1. Re:mnb Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shock just means you're not getting enough blood flow. Why wouldn't you be if you were shot? Because of blood loss, dumbass. It's called hypovolemic shock.

    2. Re:mnb Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's one kind of shock.
      not the only kind.

      Hypovolemic shock, btw, referers to shock caused by the loss of any fluid beside blood.
      Blood loss would be hemmorhagic shock.

  111. mnb Re:How is eMule... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    D.A.P.?

  112. Simplicity by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Bittorrent is a three-stage download process (search/read site, download torrent, download via bittorrent), and two-stage upload process (generate torrent, share) at least. By contrast, most p2p apps are two-stage download (search, download), and one stage upload (share file, or drop in a folder). It's simple common sense to streamline the process with previously available technology.

  113. MALE MASTURBATION LINK ON PARENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do not click it! Gross...

  114. I won't be using this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Java isn't free software.

  115. Of course it works!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...pay no attention to those error messages on your terminal! Because, as we all know, Java is Write Once, Run Everywhere®.

    1. Re:Of course it works!!! by tcoady · · Score: 1

      Wow - did not know there was so much anti-java vitriol out there. Anyway thanks for the comments - the auto update is now downloading from Downloading: http://citkit.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/azure us/Azureus2.3.0.0.jar.torrent

      Now restarted in 2.3.0.0 and working fine. Thanks for other informative comments too.

  116. mixed use of violent products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yeah...people use chemical fertilizer 'because it works.' Oops, the market introduced it to sustain industries (a.k.a. the military-industrial complex) after the war. And dont give me that 'you wacko lefty' look...that's an eisenhower term.

    "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. " ...if he could see us now.

    Just because someone uses something for a non-violent reason doesn't mean that the product doesn't exist to do violence. In one case you have industry looking for new product use, in the other you have individuals and industry encouraging and funding and sponsoring gun sports to legitimize and protect their industry from regulation -- oh but think of all the innocent sportspeople! and also to create, diversify, and rile up the voters whenever they need to.

  117. Esaier than it seems by xtracto · · Score: 1

    ed2k://|file|Ong-Bak.2003.DVDRip.XviD-VALiOMEDiA.a vi|734423040|2FF6B181449BF494173E60DB4D25E846|/

    So, for you, to be 1337 is to know how to use Emule lol... you must be |_||+|2@ |33+

    =o)

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  118. Bittorrent without tracker or .torrent files by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    I hope they don't add search. Centrality probably accounts for the higher speeds. But now you can transfer something through bittorrent without or tracker or even a .torrent file. Try magnet:?xt=urn:btih:ORCY7N3UWSZ7RXTZ3BSNEKWL3AJ3H4 MX in the open location. Nice picture of a giraffe I took.

  119. huzzah for the folks working on Azureus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who's ever run a BitTorrent tracker with any popularity can see what a great improvement this is.
    Trackers are by far the weakest part of the network, as can be seen when popular trackers go down and suddenly literally thousands of torrents are left orphaned.
    Wonderful news.

  120. I2P technology by shoota · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone have a clue what this I2P techonology is and how the azureus plugin incorporates it into bittorrent. Thanks.

    1. Re:I2P technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A try to anon any protocol by routing everything through a number of middle-man nodes and encrypting everything so that only the first and last node can see the actual bits; very much like 'tor'.

      I guess this is only done for client->tracker traffic; anything else would easily overwhelm the tor network and I don't think i2p could handle it either.

  121. No, it enhances its effectiveness by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    I've always thought of BT's lack of built-in search as an asset. Distributed search is dreck, or at least all modern incarnations thereof. The problems of file quality, mesh instability, bandwidth waste, info reachability cannot be solved, because they're inherent in working with a sparsely-connected crowd of strangers.

    Distributed search seems to me to be an artefact of its time. Then the choices were a single vulnerable center, or compromise utility to remove the center. Napster versus Gnutella.

    More modern BT has many centers with seperation of function so files can be seeded from one box, tracked on another, and listed on a third. BT's search sites like suprnova are centralized (with all the advantages), but expendable. The sum of all search sites is effectively immortal.

  122. You're forgetting home movies, etc by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    Sure, the major tracker/torrent hosting websites (Loki and Suprnova) woudl still be there if the had primarily legal stuff rather than primarily illegal stuff, but one of the things that's long made Azureus great are the fact that it only uses 1 port for everything, and the integrated tracker.

    So, in the old system JoeSmoe Blogger could upload a torrent to a homemovie and both seed the torrent and track the torrent using Azureus. However, on a cable/dsl modem, if you get enough people downloading eventually you'll out strip your ability to effectively track, let alone seed (which by this point, hopefully others will take over)

    With the P2P tracker, you can start by tracking and seeding yourself, and then eventually drop back to "Only Seed if the number of copies on the network is less than x."

    I'm sure a centrally hosted tracker would be much better, but Joe Shmoe blogger doesn't have access to a webserver, and blogger.com doesn't host torrents AFAIK. This fills the gap.
    --
    Need Referals? The ref stops here

  123. Fills the gap for Joe Shmoe Blogger by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    Why the need for decentralized trackers? I don't get it! Bittorrent is supposed to be a haven for law-abiding citizens to trade Linux ISOs and Project Gutenberg text files.

    One of the things that's long made Azureus great was the integrated tracker.

    So, in the old system JoeSmoe Blogger could upload a torrent to a homemovie and both seed the torrent and track the torrent using Azureus. However, on a cable/dsl modem, if you get enough people downloading eventually you'll out strip your ability to effectively track, let alone seed (which by this point, hopefully others will take over)

    With the P2P tracker, you can start by tracking and seeding yourself, and then eventually drop back to "Only Seed if the number of copies on the network is less than x" and not even worry about tracking. You could even drop out all together and hope the community maintains your torrent...

    I'm sure a centrally hosted tracker would be much more efficient, but Joe Shmoe blogger doesn't have access to a webserver, and blogger.com doesn't host torrents AFAIK, and a lot of the public trackers stop tracking torrents after a couple of weeks (so all the late commers are stuck with a 1 gig file half done. This fills the gap.
    --
    Need Referals? The ref stops here
    --
    Don't fight Firefox! Let FireFox fight YOU!

  124. Re:Version control system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Caveat: I work for them but don't work on this product...

    We use CA's AllFusion Harvest Change Manager and I work from home over VPN/DSL. I'm using a pre-release of the next version (r7) and it's plenty fast. Much faster than previous releases. By the looks of it, much of the per-item overhead has been eliminated. To get a new code tree from scratch for me is over 11000 files.

    Also, we have a pretty complex setup with like 20 different build states representing the entire life-cycle and repeatable builds at every level, so it can handle that aspect as well...

  125. OT, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at it this way, guns can be used to hunt for food. But the truth is, 99% of gun use is against people. You can argue about their legitmate use and bad rap 'till you're blue in the face, but the legitmate uses are statistically outweighed by bad ones.

    So any use of a gun against a person is bad? What about disabling criminals? And are you counting non-hunting sports shooting in your made up statistic?

    And what about the bigger picture? The reason we have the second ammendment in our Bill or Rights is to ensure that those rights can be protected. Have your read the Declaration of Independence lately? Do you remember this part?

    That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    Just how do you suppose the founding fathers expected us to abolish said destructive government? With pitchforks?

    Guns aren't the problem, people are the problem. Of the roughly eighty million gun owners in America, how many have used a gun to commit a crime? A quick search tells me we have a prison population of approximately two million. Let's make up a statistic (like you did!) and say that every single one of those criminals used a gun to commit a crime and came from that pool of eighty million gun owners. Our made-up statistic tells us that 2.5% of gun owners use them to commit crimes. Is this an accurate statistic? No, but it puts things in perspective, doesn't it? Do the deeds of a very few outweigh the rights of everyone else? Does taking guns away from law-abiding citizens keep them out of criminals' hands? No and no.

    If you're interesting in real statistics, the Bureau of Justice has some very interesting ones relating to the use of guns to commit violent crimes.